Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDWQ-2023-200122Official Draft Public Notice Version Month Day, year The findings, determinations, and assertions contained in this document are not final and subject to change following the public comment period. FACT SHEET AND STATEMENT OF BASIS COALVILLE CITY RENEWAL PERMIT: DISCHARGE & BIOSOLIDS UPDES PERMIT NUMBER: UT0025976 UPDES BIOSOLIDS PERMIT NUMBER: UTL-025976 MINOR MUNICIPAL FACILITY CONTACTSContact:Kyle ClarkPosition: Public Works DirectorPhone Number:435-336-5981Person Name:Sam AdamsPosition:OperatorPhone Number:435-513-5784Facility Name:Coalville City Corporation Wastewater Treatment FacilityFacility Address:63 West 100 NorthCoalville, UT 84017Mailing Address:PO Box 188Coalville, Utah 84017Telephone:435-901-2257 DESCRIPTION OF FACILITY The Coalville City Wastewater Treatment Facility (CWWTF) is located at 50 West 100 North, Coalville, Summit County, Utah in 2014. The facility serves the City of Coalville with the outfall located at latitude 40°55'13" and longitude 111°24'09". The facility has a maximum monthly design flow of0.58 MGD with an average daily flow rate of0.32 MGD. The facility consists of screening and grit removal, two parallel Modified Luzack-Ettinger (MLE) process trains, two secondary clarifiers and UV disinfection prior to discharge to an unnamed tributary to Chalk Creek in the Upper Weber River watershed. Biosolids are hauled to an offsite facility located at the Three Mile Canyon Landfill. SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS PERMIT There have been no changes to the facility since the previous permit cycle. DWQ has conducted reasonable potential analysis (RP) on all new and renewal applications received after January 1, 2016. A quantitative reasonable potential analysis (RP) was not able to be performed because there was insufficient data. Quarterly metals sampling has been added to this permit to allow for sufficient metals data for the next permit renewal. Seasonal effluent limitations for temperature have been added to this permit. Effluent limitations for dissolved oxygen (DO) have increased from a daily minimum of 5.5 mg/L to 8.0 mg/L. DISCHARGE DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE CWWTF has been reporting self-monitoring results on Discharge Monitoring Reports on a monthly basis. There have been no significant discharge violations during the past five-year permit cycle. OutfallDescription of Discharge Point 001 Located at latitude 40°55'13" and longitude 111°24'09". The 15" PVC pipe discharges to an unnamed tributary of Chalk Creek, immediately above its junction with the Weber River and Echo Reservoir. RECEIVING WATERS AND STREAM CLASSIFICATION The final discharge is to an unnamed tributary of Chalk Creek, which flows into the Weber River just above Echo Reservoir. Chalk Creek and the Weber River are classified as 1C, 2B, 3A and 4 Utah Administrative Code (UAC) R317-2-13: Class 1C -- Protected for domestic purposes with prior treatment by treatment processes as required by the Utah Division of Drinking Water Class 2B -- Protected for infrequent primary contact recreation. Also protected for secondary contact recreation where there is a low likelihood of ingestion of water or a low degree of bodily contact with the water. Examples include, but are not limited to, wading, hunting, and fishing. Class 3A -- Protected for cold water species of game fish and other cold-water aquatic life, including the necessary aquatic organisms in their food chain. Class 4 -- Protected for agricultural uses including irrigation of crops and stock watering. TOTAL MAXIUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL) REQUIREMENTS According to DWQ 2022 Integrated Report, 303(d) Assessment, Chalk Creek1-Coalville (Chalk Creek and tributaries from confluence with Weber River to South Fork confluence, UT16020101-010_00) supports all designated uses. Echo Reservoir (UT-L-16020101-001_00), located immediately downstream of the discharge, is listed as impaired (Class 3A use) for total phosphorus. The Rockport Reservoir and Echo Reservoir Total Maximum Daily Load study was approved March 26, 2014. The TMDL limited Coalville WWTP’s total phosphorus load to 582 kg annually and 291 kg during the summer (April 1st - September 30th) and total nitrogen to 5,819 kg annually and 2,909 kg during the summer. BASIS FOR EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS Limitations on total suspended solids (TSS), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5), E. coli, pH and percent removal for BOD5 and TSS are based on current Utah Secondary Treatment Standards, UAC R317-1-3.2. The oil and grease is based on best professional judgment (BPJ). Limitations on total flow, whole effluent toxicity, DO, total ammonia, metals, WET testing, and temperature are based on the Wasteload Analysis. Nitrogen and phosphorus loading limitations are based on the Rockport Reservoir and Echo Reservoir Total Maximum Daily Load. Attached is a Wasteload Analysis for this discharge into the unnamed tributary of Chalk Creek. It has been determined that this discharge will not cause a violation of water quality standards. An Antidegradation Level II review is not required since the permit is a renewal with no increase in flow or concentration over that which was approved in the previous permit. The permittee is expected to be able to comply with these limitations. Reasonable Potential Analysis Since January 1, 2016, DWQ has conducted reasonable potential analysis (RP) on all new and renewal applications received after that date. RP for this permit renewal was conducted following DWQ’s September 10, 2015 Reasonable Potential Analysis Guidance (RP Guidance).There are four outcomes defined in the RP Guidance: Outcome A, B, C, or D. These Outcomes provide a frame work for what routine monitoring or effluent limitations are required A quantitative RP analysis was not performed because there was insufficient data. Metals sampling will be required to be monitored during this permit cycle. The permit limitations are: Parameter Effluent Limitations *a Maximum Monthly Avg Maximum Weekly Avg Yearly Average Daily Minimum Daily Maximum Annual Max Summer Max (Apr-Sept) Total Flow 0.58 -- -- -- -- -- -- BOD5, mg/L BOD5 Min. % Removal 25 85 35 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- TSS, mg/L TSS Min. % Removal 25 85 35 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- TDS, mg/L Summer Fall Winter Spring -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1280.2 1332.1 1304.9 1278.9 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L -- -- -- 8.0 -- -- -- Total Ammonia (as N), mg/L Summer (Jul-Sep) Fall (Oct-Dec) Winter (Jan-Mar) Spring (Apr-Jun) 5.32 4.5 5.0 4.8 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 20.4 11.2 12.1 12.5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- E. coli, No./100mL 126 157 -- -- -- -- -- Total Phosphorus, kg -- -- -- -- -- 582 291 Total Nitrogen, kg -- -- -- -- -- 5,819 2,909 Oil & Grease, mg/L -- -- -- -- 10.0 -- -- pH, Standard Units -- -- -- 6.5 9 -- -- Temperature (Deg. C) Summer Fall Winter Spring -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 18.4 7.1 5.1 12.7 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- SELF-MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTSThe following self-monitoring requirements are the same as in the previous permitwith the addition of quarterly metals and WET monitoring. The permit will require reports to be submitted monthly and annually, as applicable, on Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) forms due 28 days after the end of the monitoring period. Effective January 1, 2017, monitoring results must be submitted using NetDMR unless the permittee has successfully petitioned for an exception. Lab sheets for biomonitoring must be attached to the biomonitoring DMR. Lab sheets for metals and toxic organics must be attached to the DMRs. Self-Monitoring and Reporting Requirements *a Parameter Frequency Sample Type Units Total Flow *b, *c Continuous Recorder MGD BOD5, Influent *d Effluent 2 X Month 2 X Month Composite Composite mg/L mg/L TSS, Influent *d Effluent 2 X Month 2 X Month Composite Composite mg/L mg/L E. coli 2 X Month Grab No./100mL pH 2 X Month Grab SU Total Ammonia (as N) 2 X Month Composite mg/L Dissolved Oxygen 2 X Month Grab mg/L Oil & Grease *e When Sheen Observed Grab mg/L Orthophosphate (as P), Effluent Monthly Composite mg/L Total Phosphorus (as P), Influent Effluent Monthly Monthly Composite Composite mg/L mg/L Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen TKN (as N), Influent Effluent Monthly Composite Composite mg/L mg/L Nitrate, NO3 Monthly Composite mg/L Nitrite, NO2 Monthly Composite mg/L Temperature, mg/L Daily Grab Deg C Metals, Influent *f Effluent Quarterly Quarterly Composite Composite mg/L mg/L*aSee Definitions, Part VIII, for definition of terms.*bFlow measurements of influent/effluent volume shall be made in such a manner that the permittee can affirmatively demonstrate that representative values are being obtained.*cIf the rate of discharge is controlled, the rate and duration of discharge shall be reported.*dIn addition to monitoring the final discharge, influent samples shall be taken and analyzed for this constituent at the same frequency as required for this constituent in the discharge.*eOil & Grease sampled when sheen is present or visible. If no sheen is present or visible, report NA. *fMetals to be analyzed include arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, cyanide, lead, mercury, nickel, selenium, silver, and zinc. BIOSOLIDS For clarification purposes, sewage sludge is considered solids, until treatment or testing shows that the solids are safe, and meet beneficial use standards. After the solids are tested or treated, the solids are then known as biosolids. Class A biosolids, may be used for high public contact sites, such as home lawns and gardens, parks, or playing fields, etc. Class B biosolids may be used for low public contact sites, such as farms, rangeland, or reclamation sites, etc. DESCRIPTION OF TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL The Permittee submitted their 2022 annual biosolids report on February 7, 2023. The report states the Permittee produced 27.24 dry metric tons (DMT) of solids. CWWT screens the influent to remove the larger pieces of debris and Modified Luzack-Ettinger (MLE) process. After treatment, the biosolids are de-watered by screw press and hauled elsewhere for disposal. If the biosolids are hauled to another facility to meet land application requirements for sale or giveaway to the public, that facility must have a valid UPDES biosolids permit and will be responsible for meeting all requirements of 40 CFR 503. Biosolids were hauled to the 3 Mile Canyon Landfill by. Approximately 27.24 DMT were hauled off-site to the landfill for disposal. SELF-MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Under 40 CFR 503.16(a)(1), the self-monitoring requirements are based upon the amount of biosolids disposed per year and shall be monitored according to the chart below. Minimum Frequency of Monitoring (40 CFR Part 503.16, 503.26. and 503.46) Amount of Biosolids Disposed Per Year Monitoring Frequency Dry US Tons Dry Metric Tons Per Year or Batch > 0 to < 320 > 0 to < 290 Once Per Year or Batch > 320 to < 1650 > 290 to < 1,500 Once a Quarter or Four Times > 1,650 to < 16,500 > 1,500 to < 15,000 Bi-Monthly or Six Times > 16,500 > 15,000 Monthly or Twelve Times CWWTFhas produced and disposed of an average of disposed of 27 DMT/year of biosolids, therefore they should sample at least once a year. However, CWWTF transfers the biosolids to the Three Mile Canyon Landfill, and as long as they continue to do this, they are only required to sample when requested by the landfill according to 40 CFR 258 for the landfill. Landfill MonitoringUnder 40 CFR 258, the landfill monitoring requirements include a paint filter test. If the biosolids do not pass a paint filter test, the biosolids cannot be disposed in the sanitary landfill (40 CFR 258.28(c)(1). CWWTF disposed of 27.3 DMT of biosolids at the 3 Mile Canyon Landfill. BIOSOLIDS LIMITATIONS Heavy MetalsClass A Biosolids for Home Lawn and Garden UseThe intent of the heavy metals regulations of Table 3,40 CFR 503.13 is to ensure the heavy metals do not build up in the soil in home lawn and gardens to the point where the heavy metals become phytotoxic to plants. The permittee will be required to produce an information sheet (see Part III. C. of the permit) to made available to all people who are receiving and land applying Class A biosolids to their lawns and gardens. If the instructions of the information sheet are followed to any reasonable degree, the Class A biosolids will be able to be land applied year after year, to the same lawns and garden plots without any deleterious effects to the environment. The information sheet must be provided to the public, because the permittee is not required, nor able to track the quantity of Class A biosolids that are land applied to home lawns and gardens.Class A Requirements With Regards to Heavy Metals If the biosolids are to be applied to a lawn or home garden, the biosolids shall not exceed the maximum heavy metals in Table 3 below. If the biosolids do not meet these requirements, the biosolids cannot be sold or given away for applications to home lawns and gardens.Class B Requirements for Agriculture and Reclamation Sites The intent of the heavy metals regulations of Tables 1, 2 and 3, of 40 CFR 503.13 is to ensure that heavy metals do not build up in the soil at farms, forest land, and land reclamation sites to the point where the heavy metals become phytotoxic to plants. The permittee will be required to produce an information sheet (see Part III. C. of the permit) to be handed out to all people who are receiving and land applying Class B biosolids to farms, ranches, and land reclamation sites (if biosolids are only applied to land owned by the permittee, the information sheet requirements are waived). If the biosolids are land applied according to the regulations of 40 CFR 503.13, to any reasonable degree, the Class B biosolids will be able to be land applied year after year, to the same farms, ranches, and land reclamation sites without any deleterious effects to the environment. Class B Requirements With Regards to Heavy Metals If the biosolids are to be land applied to agricultural land, forest land, a public contact site or a reclamation site it must meet at all times: The maximum heavy metals listed in 40 CFR Part 503.13(b) Table 1 and the heavy metals loading rates in40 CFR Part 503.13(b) Table 2; or The maximum heavy metals in 40 CFR Part 503.13(b) Table 1 and the monthly heavy metals concentrations in 40 CFR Part 503.13(b) Table 3. Tables 1, 2, and 3 of Heavy Metal Limitations Pollutant Limits, (40 CFR Part 503.13(b)) Dry Mass Basis Heavy Metals Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4   Ceiling Conc. Limits 1, (mg/kg) CPLR 2, (mg/ha) Pollutant Conc. Limits 3 (mg/kg) APLR 4, (mg/ha-yr) Total Arsenic 75 41 41 2.0 Total Cadmium 85 39 39 1.9 Total Copper 4300 1500 1500 75 Total Lead 840 300 300 15 Total Mercury 57 17 17 0.85 Total Molybdenum 75 N/A N/A N/A Total Nickel 420 420 420 21 Total Selenium 100 100 100 5.0 Total Zinc 7500 2800 2800 140 1, If the concentration of any 1 (one) of these parameters exceeds the Table 1 limit, the biosolids cannot be land applied or beneficially used in any way. 2, CPLR - Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate - The maximum loading for any 1 (one) of the parameters listed that may be applied to land when biosolids are land applied or beneficially used on agricultural, forestry, or a reclamation site. 3, If the concentration of any 1 (one) of these parameters exceeds the Table 3 limit, the biosolids cannot be land applied or beneficially used in on a lawn, home garden, or other high potential public contact site. If any 1 (one) of these parameters exceeds the Table 3 limit, the biosolids may be land applied or beneficially reused on an agricultural, forestry, reclamation site, or other high potential public contact site, as long as it meets the requirements of Table 1, Table 2, and Table 4. 4, APLR - Annual Pollutant Loading Rate - The maximum annual loading for any 1 (one) of the parameters listed that may be applied to land when biosolids are land applied or beneficially reused on agricultural, forestry, or a reclamation site, when they do not meet Table 3, but do meet Table 1.Any violation of these limitations shall be reported in accordance with the requirements of Part III.F.1. of the permit.If the biosolids do not meet these requirements they cannot be land applied. PathogensThe Pathogen Control class listed in the table below must be met; Pathogen Control Class 503.32 (a)(1) - (5), (7), (8), Class A 503.32 (b)(1) - (5), Class B B Salmonella species –less than three (3) MPN1per four (4) grams total solids (DWB)2 or Fecal Coliforms – less than 1,000 MPN per gram total solids (DWB). Fecal Coliforms – less than 2,000,000 MPN or CFU3 per gram total solids (DWB). 503.32 (a)(6) Class A—Alternative 4 B Salmonella species –less than three (3) MPN per four (4) grams total solids (DWB) or less than 1,000 MPN Fecal Coliforms per gram total solids (DWB), And - Enteric viruses –less than one (1) plaque forming unit per four (4) grams total solids(DWB) And - Viable helminth ova –less than one (1) per four (4) grams total solids (DWB) 1 - MPN – Most Probable Number 2 - DWB – Dry Weight Basis 3 - CFU – Colony Forming Units Class A Requirements for Home Lawn and Garden Use If biosolids are land applied to home lawns and gardens, the biosolids need to be treated by a specific process to further reduce pathogens (PFRP), and meet a microbiological limit of less than less than 3 most probable number (MPN) of Salmonella per 4 grams of total solids (or less than 1,000 most probable number (MPN/g) of fecal coliform per gram of total solids) to be considered Class A biosolids. At this time CWWTFdoes not intend to distribute biosolids to the public for use on the lawn and garden and thus is not required meet Class A Biosolids requirements currently. Pathogens Class B If biosolids are to be land applied for agriculture or land reclamation the solids need to be treated by a specific process to significantly reduce pathogens (PSRP). At this time CWWTFdoes not intend to distribute bulk biosolids for land application and thus is not required meet Class B Biosolids requirements currently. If CWWTF intends to land apply in the future, they will need to meet a specific PSRP, the Director must be informed at least thirty (30) days prior to its use. This change may be made without additional public notice. Vector Attraction Reduction (VAR) If the biosolids are land applied CWWTFwill be required to meet VAR through the use of a method of listed under 40 CFR 503.33. At this time CWWTFdoes not intend to distribute biosolids to the public for beneficial use, and will be disposing of them in a landfill.If the CWWT intends to land apply in the future, they need to meet one of thelisted alternatives in 40 CFR 503.33, the Director must be informed at least thirty (30) days prior to itsuse. This change may be made without additional public notice. Landfill Monitoring Under 40 CFR 258, the landfill monitoring requirements include a paint filter test to determine if the biosolids exhibit free liquid. If the biosolids do not pass a paint filter test, the biosolids cannot be disposed in the sanitary landfill (40 CFR 258.28(c)(1). Record Keeping The record keeping requirements from 40 CFR 503.17 are included under Part III.G. of the permit. The amount of time the records must be maintained are dependent on the quality of the biosolids in regards to the metals concentrations. If the biosolids continue to meet the metals limits of Table 3 of 40 CFR 503.13, and are sold or given away the records must be retained for a minimum of five years. If the biosolids are disposed in a landfill the records must retained for a minimum of five years. Reporting CWWTFmust report annually as required in 40 CFR 503.18. This report is to include the results of all monitoring performed in accordance with Part III.B of the permit, information on management practices, biosolids treatment, and certifications. This report is due no later than February 19 of each year. Each report is for the previous calendar year. MONITORING DATA METALS MONITORING DATA Coalville does not have any categorical industrial contributors to the system and landfills all biosolids produced so the pathogen and pollutant monitoring requirements for the biosolids has been removed from the permit. This may be re y have been granted the elimination of biosolids pollutant and The CWWTF is not required to monitor biosolids for pathogens and pollutants. As a result of this, there is no monitoring data. STORM WATER Separate storm water permits may be required based on the types of activities occurring on site. Industrial Storm Water Permit coverage under UPDES Permit UTR000000 is not required due to the facility having a design flow of less than 1 MGD. Storm Water permit provisions have been removed from this UPDES permit as part of a programmatic separation of the previously combined UPDES Industrial permit. Construction General Storm Water Permit under UPDES Permit UTRC00000 is required for any construction at the facility which disturbs an acre or more. STORM WATER REQUIREMENTS Due to the facility having a design flow of less than 1 MGD, the permittee is not required to maintain separate coverage or an appropriate exclusion under the Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP) for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities (UTR000000). Separate permit coverage under the Construction General Storm Water Permit (CGP) may be required for any construction at the facility which disturbs an acre or more of land. A Notice of Intent (NOI) is required to obtain a construction storm water permit prior to the period of construction. This can also be accomplished online at: https://deq.utah.gov/water-quality/general-construction-storm-water-updes-permits. Information onstorm water permit requirements can be found at http://stormwater.utah.gov PRETREATMENT REQUIREMENTS The pretreatment requirements in the permit are to assist the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) in understanding the sources discharging to the Coalville Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW). Coalville has not been designated for implementing an Approved POTW Pretreatment Program (Program). This is due to the flow through the plant being less than 1 MGD and a review of the service area and UPDES Permit Application by DWQ. Based on this information, DWQ did not find any industrial discharges that are or could be Significant Industrial Users of the Coalville POTW. Coalville does not have to develop an Approved Program;however, any wastewater discharged to the CoalvillePOTW is subject to Federal, State and local regulations. Pursuant to Section 307 of the Clean Water Act, Coalville must comply with the permit to ensure DWQ can adequately control Industrial Dischargers to the Coalville POTW. DWQ encourages Coalville to attend training regarding the Pretreatment Program. This will ensure Industrial Users are found and reported to DWQ. Which is a requirement regarding the industrial waste survey (IWS) in Part II of the UPDES Permit. If an Industrial User begins to discharge or an existing Industrial User changes their discharge,Coalville must resubmit an IWS within sixty days following the introduction or change as stated in Part II of the permit. Please contact the DWQ Pretreatment Coordinator for assistance in classifying an Industrial User. It is required that Coalville submit for review any Local Limits that are developed to DWQ for review. If local limits are developed, it is required that Coalvill perform an annual evaluation of the need to revise or develop technically based local limits for pollutants of concern to implement the general and specific prohibitions 40 CFR, Part 403.5(a) and Part 403.5(b). This evaluation may indicate that present local limits are sufficiently protective, need to be revised or should be developed. BIOMONITORING REQUIREMENTS A nationwide effort to control toxic discharges where effluent toxicity is an existing or potential concern is regulated in accordance with the Utah Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit and Enforcement Guidance Document for Whole Effluent Toxicity Control (biomonitoring), dated February 2018. Authority to require effluent biomonitoring is provided in Permit Conditions, UAC R317-8-4.2, Permit Provisions, UAC R317-8-5.3 and Water Quality Standards, UAC R317-2-5 and R317 -2-7.2. The permittee is a minor municipal facility discharging less than 1MGD. Additionally, there is not enough information on the receiving water. Based on these considerations, there will be no Whole Effluent Toxicity testing in this permit. The permit will contain toxicity reopener language. PERMIT DURATIONIt is recommended that this permit be effective for a duration of five (5) years.Drafted and Reviewed byJennifer Berjikian, Discharge Permit WriterDaniel Griffin, BiosolidsJennifer Robinson, PretreatmentLonnie Shull, BiomonitoringCarl Adams, Storm WaterChristine Osborne, TMDL/Watershed Suzan Tahir, Wasteload AnalysisUtah Division of Water Quality, (801) 536-4300PUBLIC NOTICEBegan: Month Day, YearEnded: Month Day, YearComments will be received at: 195 North 1950 West PO Box 144870 Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4870The Public Noticed of the draft permit was published on the Division of Water Quality webpage.During the public comment period provided under R317-8-6.5, any interested person may submit written comments on the draft permit and may request a public hearing, if no hearing has already been scheduled. A request for a public hearing shall be in writing and shall state the nature of the issues proposed to be raised in the hearing. All comments will be considered in making the final decision and shall be answered as provided in R317-8-6.12.ADDENDUM TO FSSOBResponsiveness Summary(Explain any comments received and response sent. Actual letters can be referenced, but not required to be included). This Page Intentionally Left Blank ATTACHMENT 1 Industrial Waste Survey This Page Intentionally Left BlankIndustrial Pretreatment Wastewater SurveyDo you periodically experience any of the following treatment works problems:foam, floaties or unusual colorsplugged collection lines caused by grease, sand, flour, etc.discharging excessive suspended solids, even in the wintersmells unusually badwaste treatment facility doesn’t seem to be treating the waste rightPerhaps the solution to a problem like one of these may lie in investigating the types and amounts of wastewater entering the sewer system from industrial users.An industrial user (IU) is defined as a non-domestic user discharging to the waste treatment facility which meets any of the following criteria: 1.has a lot of process wastewater (5% of the flow at the waste treatment facility or more than 25,000 gallons per work day.)Examples:Food processor, dairy, slaughterhouse, industrial laundry.2.is subject to Federal Categorical Pretreatment Standards;Examples:metal plating, cleaning or coating of metals, blueing of metals, aluminum extruding, circuit board manufacturing, tanning animal skins, pesticide formulating or packaging, and pharmaceutical manufacturing or packaging,3.is a concern to the POTW.Examples:septage hauler, restaurant and food service, car wash, hospital, photo lab, carpet cleaner, commercial laundry.All users of the water treatment facility are prohibited from making the following types of discharges:1.A discharge which creates a fire or explosion hazard in the collection system.2.A discharge which creates toxic gases, vapor or fumes in the collection system.3.A discharge of solids or thick liquids which creates flow obstructions in the collection system.4.An acidic discharge (low pH) which causes corrosive damage to the collection system.5.Petroleum oil, nonbiodegradable cutting oil, or products of mineral oil origin in amounts that will cause problems in the collection system or at the waste treatment facility.6.Waste haulers are prohibited from discharging without permission. (No midnight dumping!)When the solution to a sewer system problem may be found by investigating the types and amounts of wastewater entering the sewer system discharged from IUs, it’s appropriate to conduct an Industrial Waste Survey.An Industrial Waste Survey consists of:Step 1: Identify Industrial UsersMake a list of all the commercial and industrial sewer connections.Sources for the list:business license, building permits, water and wastewater billing, Chamber of Commerce, newspaper, telephone book, yellow pages.Split the list into two groups:domestic wastewater only--no further information neededeveryone else (IUs)Step 2: Preliminary InspectionGo visit each IU identified on the “everybody else” list. Fill out the Preliminary Inspection Form during the site visit.Step 3: Informing the StatePlease fax or send a copy of the Preliminary inspection form (both sides) to:Jennifer RobinsonDivision of Water Quality288 North 1460 WestP.O. Box 144870Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4870Phone: (801) 536-4383Fax:(801) 536-4301E-mail:jenrobinson@utah.govF:\WP\Pretreatment\Forms\IWS.doc PRELIMINARY INSPECTION FORM INSPECTION DATE / / Name of Business Person Contacted Address Phone Number Description of Business Principal product or service: Raw Materials used: Production process is: [ ] Batch [ ] Continuous[ ] Both Is production subject to seasonal variation? [ ] yes[ ] no If yes, briefly describe seasonal production cycle. This facility generates the following types of wastes (check all that apply): 1. [ ] Domestic wastes(Restrooms, employee showers, etc.) 2. [ ] Cooling water, non-contact3. [ ] Boiler/Tower blowdown 4. [ ] Cooling water, contact5. [ ] Process 6. [ ] Equipment/Facility washdown7. [ ] Air Pollution Control Unit 8. [ ] Storm water runoff to sewer9. [ ] Other describe Wastes are discharged to (check all that apply): [ ] Sanitary sewer[ ] Storm sewer [ ] Surface water[ ] Ground water [ ] Waste haulers[ ] Evaporation [ ] Other (describe) Name of waste hauler(s), if used Is a grease trap installed?YesNo Is it operational?YesNo Does the business discharge a lot of process wastewater?More than 5% of the flow to the waste treatment facility?YesNoMore than 25,000 gallons per work day?YesNo Does the business do any of the following:[ ] Adhesives[ ] Car Wash[ ] Aluminum Forming[ ] Carpet Cleaner[ ] Battery Manufacturing[ ] Dairy[ ] Copper Forming[ ] Food Processor[ ] Electric & Electronic Components[ ] Hospital[ ] Explosives Manufacturing[ ] Laundries[ ]Foundries[ ] Photo Lab[ ]Inorganic Chemicals Mfg. or Packaging[ ] Restaurant & Food Service[ ] Industrial Porcelain Ceramic Manufacturing[ ] Septage Hauler[ ] Iron & Steel[ ] Slaughter House [ ] Metal Finishing, Coating or Cleaning [ ] Mining [ ] Nonferrous Metals Manufacturing [ ] Organic Chemicals Manufacturing or Packaging [ ] Paint & Ink Manufacturing [ ] Pesticides Formulating or Packaging [ ] Petroleum Refining [ ] Pharmaceuticals Manufacturing or Packaging [ ] Plastics Manufacturing [ ] Rubber Manufacturing [ ] Soaps & Detergents Manufacturing [ ] Steam Electric Generation [ ] Tanning Animal Skins [ ] Textile Mills Are any process changes or expansions planned during the next three years? YesNo If yes, attach a separate sheet to this form describing the nature of planned changes or expansions. Inspector Waste Treatment Facility Please send a copy of the preliminary inspection form (both sides) to: Jennifer Robinson Division of Water Quality P. O. Box 144870 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4870 Phone:(801) 536-4383 Fax:(801) 536-4301E-Mail:jenrobinson@utah.gov Industrial User Jurisdiction SIC Codes Categorical Standard Number Total Average Process Flow (gpd) Total Average Facility Flow (gpd) Facility Description 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 This Page Intentionally Left Blank ATTACHMENT 2 Effluent Monitoring Data This Page Intentionally Left Blank ATTACHMENT 3 Wasteload Analysis This Page Intentionally Left Blank ATTACHMENT 4 Reasonable Potential Analysis This Page Intentionally Left Blank REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Water Quality has worked to improve our reasonable potential analysis (RP) for the inclusion of limits for parameters in the permit by using an EPA provided model. As a result of the model, more parameters may be included in the renewal permit. A Copy of the Reasonable Potential Analysis Guidance (RP Guide) is available at water Quality. There are four outcomes for the RP Analysis. They are; Outcome A:A new effluent limitation will be placed in the permit. Outcome B:No new effluent limitation. Routine monitoring requirements will be placed or increased from what they are in the permit, Outcome C:No new effluent limitation. Routine monitoring requirements maintained as they are in the permit, Outcome D:No limitation or routine monitoring requirements are in the permit. A quantitative RP was not performed on effluent metals data because there is inadequate data for use in a RP. Additional monitoring for metals will be included in this permit to support future RP.