DRC-2021-005524 - 0901a06880e6d3f2

Radioactive Material License Application / Federal Cell Facility

Page E-1 Appendix E April 9, 2021
Revision 0

APPENDIX E

REVISED HYDROGEOLOGIC REPORT

WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITY CLIVE, UTAH

REVISED YDROGEOLOGIC EPORT
WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITY
CLIVE, UTAH
VERSION 4.0

JANUARY 15, 2019
Table of Contents
i
Page
1. Introduction 1
2. Previous Studies 1
3. Site Description 2
4. Geology 3
5. Hydrogeology 4
5.1 Regional Hydrgeology 4
5.2 Site Hydrogeology 4
5.2.1 Hydrostratigraphic Units 4
5.2.2 Hydraulic Conductivity 6
5.2.3 Methods of Performing Fresh Water Equivalent Head Adjustments 7
5.2.4 Horizontal Groundwater Flow 7
5.2.4.1 Shallow Aquifer 7
5.2.4.2 Deep Aquifer 11
5.2.5 Vertical Groundwater Flow 11
5.2.6 Deeper Hydrostratigraphic Units 12
5.2.7 Groundwater Chemistry 12
6. Summary and Conclusions 14
15
Section
ii
List of Tables

Table 1: Summary of Monitoring Well, Borehole and Lysimeter Information
Table 2: Hydrostratigraphic Unit Contact Elevation and Unit Thickness
Table 3: Site-Wide Hydraulic Conductivity Test Results
Table 4: Summary of Groundwater Elevations
Table 5: Summary of Horizontal Gradients and Velocities
Table 6: Summary of Vertical Gradients and Velocities
Table 7: Summary of Groundwater Total Dissolve Solids

List of Figures

Figure 1: Clive Facility Features and Topographical Map
Figure 2: Monitoring Well, Piezometer, Borehole and Lysimeter Locations
Figure 3: Regional Geologic Map
Figure 4: Unit 4 Clay Isopach Map
Figure 5: Top of Unit 2 Clay Structural Contour Map
Figure 6: Hydrogeologic Cross-Section Location Map
Figure 7: Hydrogeologic Cross-Section A-A’
Figure 8: Hydrogeologic Cross-Section B-B’
Figure 9: Hydrogeologic Cross-Section C-C’
Figure 10: Hydrogeologic Cross-Section D-D’
Figure 11: Hydrogeologic Cross-Section E-E’
Figure 12: Hydrogeologic Cross-Section F-F’
Figure 13: Hydrogeologic Cross-Section G-G’
Figure 14: Shallow Aquifer Hydraulic Conductivity Contour Map
Figure 15: 2018 Fourth Quarter Shallow Aquifer Groundwater Elevations
Figure 16: Comparison 2018 Fourth Quarter to December 2011 Shallow Aquifer
Groundwater Elevations
Figure 17: 2018 Fourth Quarter Deep Aquifer Groundwater Elevations
Figure 18: Total Dissolved Solids Iso-Concentration Map

Appendix
Appendix A: Monitoring well, Piezometer, and Borehole Logs and Completion
Diagrams (electronic)
Revised Hydrogeologic Report, EnergySolutions – Version 4.0 January 15, 2019
1
1. Introduction
EnergySolutions, LLC (EnergySolutions) operates a commercial landfill near Clive, Utah to dispose of Class A Radioactive Waste (Class A), 11e.(2) waste (uranium mill tailings),
and mixed radioactive and hazardous waste (Mixed Waste).
The purpose of this report is to provide hydrogeologic information relevant to the
renewal of EnergySolutions’ Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit No. UGW450005
(GWQDP) issued by the State of Utah Division of Water Quality (DWQ) and administered by the Utah Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control
(DWMRC).
No new geologic data have been collected at the Clive Facility since submittal of the
previous Revised Hydrogeological Report (CD13-0336, December 2, 2013). As such,
this revised report combines updated hydrogeologic and groundwater chemistry information with the known geology and stratigraphy from previous studies to evaluate
current hydrogeologic conditions at the facility.
2. Previous Studies
A number of hydrogeologic studies have been conducted for the facility. The following is a summary of major documents supporting the preparation of this report, which have
been previously submitted to regulatory agencies. Additional references are provided in
Section 7.
1991 - Hydrogeologic Report (Bingham Environmental): Initial hydrogeologic report for the GWQDP.
1993 - As-Built for Suction Lysimeters and Soil Resistivity Instruments (Bingham
Environmental): In situ moisture content, bulk density, grain size analysis,
laboratory hydraulic conductivity, and soil pore fluid analyses.
1993 - Laboratory Analysis and Soil Hydraulic Properties of TP-1-4B and TP-2-4W Soil Samples (D.B. Stephens): Moisture content, bulk density, porosity, and
hydraulic conductivity.
1995 - Additional Information: Suction Lysimeters and Soil Resistivity Instruments
(Bingham Environmental): In situ moisture content, bulk density, grain size
analysis, laboratory hydraulic conductivity, soil pore fluid analyses, and as-built installation diagrams.
1996 - Revised Hydrogeologic Report (Bingham Environmental): Hydrogeologic
information and interpretation.
Revised Hydrogeologic Report, EnergySolutions – Version 4.0 January 15, 2019
2
1997 - Final Slug Test Results, Envirocare of Utah South Clive Facility, Tooele
County, Utah (Adrian Brown Consultants): Hydraulic conductivity
measurements, methodology, and results.
1999 - Compilation and Analysis of Envirocare Groundwater Quality Data (Mayo and Associates): Time-series plots, contour maps, well logs, and statistical
analyses of data from compliance monitoring wells.
1999 - Final Report for Slug Withdrawal Testing at Envirocare’s Clive, Utah Facility,
(EarthFax): Hydraulic conductivity measurements from bail tests.
1999 - Differential Leveling Survey for Envirocare of Utah, (Pentacore Resources): Well head elevation survey.
2000 - Revised Hydrogeologic Report for the Envirocare Waste Disposal Facility
Clive, Utah (Pentacore Resources): Hydrogeologic information and
interpretation.
2004 - Revised Hydrogeologic Report for the Envirocare Waste Disposal Facility Clive, Utah, Version 2.0 (Envirocare of Utah, Inc.): Hydrogeologic
information and interpretation.
2013 - Revised Hydrogeologic Report for the EnergySolutions Waste Disposal
Facility Clive, Utah, Version 3.1 (EnergySolutions): Hydrogeologic
information and interpretation.
In addition, other reports and technical memoranda have been prepared for the Clive,
Utah facility. These documents include quarterly, semiannual, and annual groundwater
monitoring reports, and regional geologic and hydrogeologic studies.
3. Site Description
The EnergySolutions facility is sited in Section 32, T1S, R11W Salt Lake Base and
Meridian near Clive, Utah, approximately 80 miles west of Salt Lake City.
EnergySolutions began waste disposal activities at the facility in 1988. At present, waste
is placed in one of three disposal embankments: Class A West, Mixed Waste, or 11e.(2). A fourth embankment, the LARW embankment, located between the Mixed Waste and
11e.(2) embankments, was closed in October 2005. On November 26, 2012, the Utah
Division of Radiation Control (DRC) approved an amendment to EnergySolutions’
Radioactive Material License UT 2300249 to combine the Class A and Class A North
embankments into the Class A West embankment. In the north-central part of the facility, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has disposed of the Vitro uranium mill
tailings. This area is owned and monitored by the DOE.
The facility is one square mile in size, encompassing all of Section 32 (less the DOE-
owned Vitro property, which is approximately 100 acres). Figure 1 shows the disposal
Revised Hydrogeologic Report, EnergySolutions – Version 4.0 January 15, 2019
3
cells and major man-made and topographic features at the facility. The facility is located
at an average elevation of approximately 4,270 feet above mean sea level (amsl). The
natural topography slopes slightly toward the southwest with approximately 10 feet of
relief from the northeast corner of the section to the southwest corner of the section. The area is semi-arid, with an average precipitation of 8.43 inches per year and average pan
evaporation of 53.3 inches per year (based on on-site data collected from 1993 to 2017;
MSI, 2018).
The locations of monitoring wells, boreholes, piezometers, and lysimeters are shown on
Figure 2, and a data summary for these installations is presented as Table 1. Table 1 includes information on location, completion depth, well abandonment, and hydraulic
tests. Since the submittal of the previous Revised Hydrogeological Report (CD13-0336,
December 2, 2013), six monitoring wells have been abandoned to facilitate construction
of the Class A West embankment. The abandoned wells are GW-81 through GW-86
(Table 1). No new wells have been installed at the Clive Facility since the submittal of the previous Revised Hydrogeological Report.
4. Geology
The facility is located in the eastern margin of the Great Salt Lake Desert, part of the Basin and Range Province. This province is characterized by north-south trending
mountain ranges with discontinuous alluvium-filled valleys found between the ranges.
The mountains are composed of mainly Paleozoic-age sedimentary rocks, but can also be
composed of volcanic rocks. Metamorphic rocks do not outcrop in the vicinity of the
facility, with the closest occurring in the Granite Peak area, approximately 40 miles south of Clive. The intermountain troughs are filled primarily with unconsolidated alluvial,
lacustrine, fluvial, and evaporite deposits; but pyroclastics, aeolian sediments, and basalt
flows also occur (Bingham Environmental, 1996; Dames & Moore, 1982 and 1987; and
Stephens, 1974). Sediments near the mountains are predominately colluvial and alluvial,
and are generally coarser grained than the lacustrine deposits found in the center of the valleys.
A geologic map of Section 32 and adjacent sections is presented as Figure 3, based on
information in Solomon (1993). Figure 3 also shows major man-made features in the
area that may affect groundwater recharge. The facility is situated on Quaternary-age
lacustrine lake bed deposits associated with the former Lake Bonneville. These surficial lacustrine deposits are generally comprised of low-permeability silty clay. Surficial sand
and gravel outcrops are mapped in the sections adjacent to the facility.
Beneath the facility, the sediments consist predominantly of interbedded silt, sand, and
clay with occasional gravel lenses. The depth of the valley fill beneath the facility is
unknown; estimates range from 250 to 3,000 feet below ground surface (bgs). The deepest borehole within Section 32 (well SC-1) was drilled to a depth of 250 feet bgs
without encountering bedrock. An exploratory borehole for a potential water-supply well
on Section 29 north of the EnergySolutions facility did not encounter bedrock at a depth
Revised Hydrogeologic Report, EnergySolutions – Version 4.0 January 15, 2019
4
of 620 feet bgs (Shrum, 1999). Black et al. (1999) states that up to 3,000 feet of basin
fill sediment are present in the Ripple Valley (the basin immediately north of Interstate-
80, east of the Grayback Hills).
The Grayback Hills are located approximately four miles north of the facility and are outcrops of extrusive igneous and sedimentary rocks. Igneous extrusive rocks
(trachyandesite lava flows) form a resistant cap on the Grayback Hills, and volcaniclastic
rocks are mapped in the area. The lava flows and volcaniclastics have been dated as
latest Eocene to earliest Oligocene (38-35 million years before present). Exposed
sedimentary rocks in the Grayback Hills are Permian and Triassic Grandeur, Murdock Mountain, Gerster, Dinwoody, and Thaynes Formations consisting of predominantly
carbonate units (Doelling et al., 1994). Lake Bonneville cycle lakes have inundated and
modified the outcropping rocks of the Grayback Hills. Lacustrine deposits are present,
including sands and gravels associated with bars, splits, and beaches. Petrographic
examination of gravel from the Grayback Hills determined the gravel is composed almost entirely of acidic to intermediate volcanic rock. Rock types were identified as
trachyandesite, dacite/andesite with a scoriaceous texture, pyroclastic, rhyolite, and a
small volume of limestone. Many of the gravel particles are partially or completely
coated in caliche (Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc., 2012).
A more complete description of the regional geology is given in the Bingham Environmental Inc. (1996) Report.
5. Hydrogeology
5.1 Regional hydrogeology
Groundwater recharge to alluvium-filled valleys in the Basin and Range Province occurs primarily through the alluvial fan deposits along the flanks of the adjoining mountains. Because of the low precipitation and high evapotranspiration, direct infiltration of water
into shallow aquifers in the valley floors is negligible. The regional groundwater flow
direction is toward the Great Salt Lake to the east-northeast.
As the groundwater flows through the valleys, the salinity of the water increases due to dissolution of evaporite deposits, and in shallow aquifers, by concentration of salts due to evapotranspiration. The exploratory borehole drilled to a depth of 620 feet to support a
potential water-supply well on Section 29 did not encounter fresh water (Shrum, 1999).
The borehole was not completed as a well.
5.2 Site hydrogeology
5.2.1 Hydrostratigraphic units
Four hydrostratigraphic units are defined beneath the EnergySolutions facility based on depth bgs, presence/absence of groundwater, and stratigraphy. The units are the
following:
Revised Hydrogeologic Report, EnergySolutions – Version 4.0 January 15, 2019
5
Unit 4: This uppermost unit is comprised of silt and clay. Unit 4 extends from the
ground surface to a depth of 6 to 16.5 feet bgs, averaging approximately 10 feet in
thickness. Unit 4 is unsaturated beneath the facility. An isopach map showing the
thickness of Unit 4 is presented as Figure 4. Much of the variability of this unit shown in this figure is related to uncertainty in the original ground surface due to
construction activities (cut and fill). Material from Unit 4 is used as the liner and
radon barrier for waste disposal cells at the facility. Unit 4 is composed primarily
of units logged in the field as CL (inorganic clay) and ML (inorganic silt)
according to the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS).
Unit 3: Unit 3 underlies Unit 4, and is composed predominantly of silty sand with
interbedded silt and clay layers. Unit 3 ranges from 7 to 25 feet in thickness,
averaging approximately 15 feet. The lower portion of Unit 3 is saturated beneath
much of the western portion of the facility. The unconfined water-bearing zone
occurring in Unit 3 (and the upper part of Unit 2) has been designated as the “shallow aquifer.” Unit 3 consists predominantly of units logged in the field as
SM (silty sand), with some SP (poorly graded sand) and SC (clayey sand).
Interbeds of CL and ML may be present.
Unit 2: Unit 2 underlies Unit 3, and is typically composed of clay with occasional
silty sand interbeds. Unit 2 ranges in thickness from 9 to 22 feet, averaging 15 feet. A structure contour map of the top of Unit 2 is shown as Figure 5. The upper
part of Unit 2 is saturated beneath the facility, and along with the lower part of
Unit 3, comprises the shallow aquifer. On the eastern side of the facility the water
table of the shallow aquifer occurs in Unit 2, and Unit 3 is unsaturated. Unit 2 is
composed primarily of units logged in the field as CL and ML. Interbeds logged as sand may occur. The top of Unit 2 is typically defined as the first occurrence of vertically continuous CL and/or ML beneath Unit 3.
Unit 1: The deepest hydrostratigraphic unit identified beneath the facility, Unit 1
typically consists of silty sand interbedded with clay and silt layers. Few borings
penetrate this unit, and the thickness has not been determined. Unit 1 is saturated beneath the facility, and contains a locally confined water-bearing zone,
designated as the “deep aquifer.” The top of Unit 1 is typically defined as the first
occurrence of a unit beneath Unit 2 logged as sand in the field.
Seven hydrogeologic cross-sections were constructed for this report using stratigraphic
information from well, borehole, piezometer, and lysimeter soil classification logs. The locations of these cross-sections are shown on Figure 6. The cross-sections are presented
as Figures 7 through 13. Logs and completion diagrams for all monitor wells, and
boreholes at the facility are included in electronic format as Appendix A. As stated
above no additional borings or wells have been completed since submittal of the previous Revised Hydrogeological Report.
Revised Hydrogeologic Report, EnergySolutions – Version 4.0 January 15, 2019
6
The stratigraphic contact elevation and unit thickness data used to construct the Unit 4
isopach map, Unit 2 structure contour map, and the hydrogeologic cross-sections are
shown in Table 2.
Where several monitoring wells, boreholes, or lysimeters are located within a small area, a single log was selected to represent all logs in the immediate vicinity. The
representative log was chosen based on log detail, quality, and total depth. Logs not
included on the cross-sections, Unit 4 isopach map, or Unit 2 structure contour map are
referenced to representative logs in Table 2.
On Figures 7 through 13 (cross-sections B-B’ through G-G’), the saline groundwater phreatic surface elevation is shown.
The cross-sections and Unit 2 structure contour map indicate that the stratigraphic
contacts generally dip gently toward the west. There is little variation in the thickness of
the units beneath the facility, and also there are no evident lateral trends in the attitude or
thickness of the units. What variability in thickness occurs is more likely due to inconsistencies and uncertainties in soil classification during borehole logging, rather
than to actual changes in thickness. Soil descriptions in many of the older boreholes were
performed at 5-foot intervals, in contrast to more recent boreholes which were
continuously cored.
The stratigraphy and structure presented in this report are consistent with interpretations presented in previous the hydrogeologic reports (Bingham Environmental, 1991 and
1996; Pentacore, 2000; Envirocare, 2004; EnergySolutions, 2013).
5.2.2. Hydraulic conductivity
Hydraulic tests were conducted on 117 wells completed in the shallow aquifer (Adrian
Brown Consultants, 1997; EarthFax, 1999, 2006, 2007, and 2009) and one well completed in the deep aquifer (EarthFax, 2009). These tests were performed by bailing a
known volume of water from the well and monitoring groundwater level recovery. In the
shallow aquifer, hydraulic conductivity values estimated from these tests ranged from
0.01 to 18 ft/day (2.23E-06 to 6.29E-03 cm/sec), with an arithmetic mean of 3.20 ft/day
(1.13E-03 cm/sec). Table 3 summarizes these data. The data shown represent the average hydraulic conductivity value for all tests on a given well since 1997.
The spatial distribution of log-transformed hydraulic conductivity is shown in Figure 14.
Areas of relatively higher hydraulic conductivity (greater than 10-3.00 cm/sec) are present
in the northwest quarter of Section 32 and along the south-central edge of Section 32.
Relatively lower conductivities (less than 10-3.75 cm/sec) are observed in western half of the 11.e(2) footprint and in the wells associated with the 1995 and 1997 evaporation
ponds. In contrast to spatial trends in data, there are areas where hydraulic conductivity
varies by an order of magnitude or more over a short distance (see GW-27 vs. GW-95,
GW-27 vs. GW-99, GW-134 vs. GW-133, GW-134 vs. GW-135, GW-26 vs. GW-94, and
GW-92 vs. GW-93).
Revised Hydrogeologic Report, EnergySolutions – Version 4.0 January 15, 2019
7
The vertical hydraulic conductivity of Hydrostratigraphic Unit 1 was measured in the
laboratory using soil core samples collected during the installation of deep well GW-
139D (EnergySolutions, 2010a). The samples were obtained from 43 to 60 feet bgs in
Unit 1. Vertical conductivities ranged from 6.2E-05 to 4.5E-03 ft/day (2.2E-08 to 1.6E-06 cm/sec), with an arithmetic mean of 8.2E-04 ft/day (2.9E-07 cm/sec) and
geometric mean of 2.2E-04 ft/day (7.8E-08 cm/sec). On average, the vertical hydraulic
conductivity of Unit 1 at the GW-139D location is more than three orders of magnitude
lower than the horizontal hydraulic conductivity of the shallow aquifer.
In general, field-test hydraulic conductivity measurements included in this report should not be compared to values given in earlier hydrogeologic reports due to changes in
hydraulic testing methodology. Prior to 1997, hydraulic tests were performed by
inducing a rise in water levels in the test wells (slug-in tests). Corrections for the
resulting increase in saturated thickness of the aquifer were not made and the tests were
redone.
5.2.3. Methods of performing fresh water equivalent head adjustments
EnergySolutions adjusts groundwater elevations measured in the field to account for
differences in salinity between monitor wells. This methodology involves calculating a
fresh water equivalent head elevation for each well, which is then used to determine
horizontal groundwater flow directions and velocity, to calculate horizontal hydraulic gradients, and to calculate vertical hydraulic gradients at well pairs.
5.2.4. Horizontal Groundwater Flow
5.2.4.1 Shallow aquifer
Groundwater in the shallow aquifer beneath the facility flows generally toward the
northeast. An unadjusted saline and fresh water equivalent head surface elevation contour map for the shallow aquifer using data from fourth quarter 2018 is presented as
Figure 15. Groundwater elevation data used to construct these maps are presented in
Table 4. At the EnergySolutions facility, the differences between the elevation of the
unadjusted saline water phreatic surface elevation and the calculated fresh water
equivalent head elevation at the midpoints of the saturated filter packs are relatively minor, averaging 0.16 feet. Similarly, groundwater flow directions and gradients as seen
on the elevation contour maps are essentially identical, comparing saline to fresh water
equivalent contours.
Table 5 shows that fresh water equivalent horizontal groundwater gradients in the
shallow aquifer range from 1.89E-05 to 5.39E-03 ft/ft, and the site-wide average gradient is 8.92E-04 ft/ft using data from fourth quarter 2018. These horizontal gradients are very
similar to those reported in the previous Revised Hydrogeological Report using water-
level data collected in December 2011. The average linear velocity of horizontal
groundwater flow was calculated by multiplying the gradient by the hydraulic
conductivity and dividing by the effective porosity. Hydraulic conductivity values are
Revised Hydrogeologic Report, EnergySolutions – Version 4.0 January 15, 2019
8
presented in Table 3. The effective porosity was assumed to be 0.29, the value used in
previous disposal cell infiltration and transport modeling (Whetstone Associates 2011
and 2012). In order to illustrate the effect of gradient on groundwater flow velocity at the
facility, horizontal velocity was calculated and presented in Table 5 for the average gradients using the site-wide geometric mean hydraulic conductivity of 5.96E-04 cm/sec
(1.69 ft/day). Velocities ranged from 3.65E-03 to 9.32E-03 ft/day. If the site-wide
geometric mean hydraulic conductivity is replaced with the site-wide arithmetic mean
hydraulic conductivity of 1.13E-03 cm/sec (3.20 ft/day), the horizontal velocity ranges
from 6.90E-03 to 1.76E-02 ft/day (Table 5). These horizontal velocities are slightly higher than those reported in the previous Revised Hydrogeological Report for all
embankments except the Mixed Waste embankment, reflecting a slightly higher average
horizontal gradient at all embankments except for the Mixed Waste embankment.
Detailed information on groundwater elevation and gradient are provided to DWMRC in
annual groundwater monitoring reports.
Velocity estimates using the fresh water equivalent elevations to determine hydraulic
gradients are essentially identical to those estimated using the unadjusted saline water
elevations, and they are well within the anticipated range of variability due to
uncertainties in porosity and hydraulic conductivity, especially considering the
heterogeneous nature of the sediments beneath the facility.
The general flow direction of groundwater in the shallow aquifer is N45oE to N55oE
beneath most of the northern half and the southeastern quarter of the Clive facility.
Mounding (discussed below) has influenced the direction of flow in the shallow aquifer
primarily in the southwestern quarter of the facility. Flow direction varies from the
general northeast direction to more northerly, and in some locations, flows are locally to the northwest (Figure 15).
Localized Recharge and Mounding in the Shallow Aquifer
In three areas, localized recharge of non-contact surface water has impacted groundwater
elevations, gradients, and flow directions in the shallow aquifer in the vicinity of the
source of recharge. Each area is summarized below.
11e.(2) Area – From March 1993 to spring 1997, a borrow pit was excavated within the
footprint of the 11e.(2) cell to provide low permeability clay for adjacent disposal cell
construction (Pentacore, 2000). The pit occasionally filled with rain water and infiltration
from the pit resulted in a groundwater mound near wells GW-37 and GW-38, based on
observed water levels in those wells. Beginning earlier, around 1991, the area also received runoff from the Vitro embankment. A temporary diversion ditch was
constructed to route Vitro runoff west between the 11e.(2) embankment and (what is
now) the Class A embankment and then south along the Tooele County road to the
southwest pond. In 2001, Vitro runoff was re-routed to the present configuration: south
along the east side of the 11e.(2) embankment and then west to the southwest pond.
Revised Hydrogeologic Report, EnergySolutions – Version 4.0 January 15, 2019
9
The groundwater mound reached its greatest height in the mid to late 1990s and has
dissipated since that time. Although attenuated, the impact of the mound on shallow
groundwater flow is still observed in the southwest and west portions of the facility
where flow is more northerly and the gradient is steeper than average. Figure 16 compares fresh water equivalent head surface elevations for fourth quarter 2018 to data
used in the previous Revised Hydrogeological Report (collected in December 2011).
Recent groundwater elevations in the 11e.(2) area are approximately 0.5 to 1.0 feet higher
than those measured in December 2011. EnergySolutions attributes this observation to
above-average precipitation in 2015 and 2016 (MSI, 2018).
Southwest Pond Area – The southwest pond was constructed in late 1997 to receive
non-contact surface water runoff from Section 32. Following periods of elevated
precipitation, typically in the spring, the pond has overflowed (by design) into Section 6.
The pond reportedly leaked in 2004 (EnergySolutions, 2009); however, the leak was
subsequently repaired.
Groundwater recharge and mounding from overflow/leakage associated with the pond
have been observed in well GW-19A and piezometer PZ-1. In response to recharge
events, groundwater elevation increases as high as 4 to 9 feet above static have been
observed at GW-19A since 1997. The peak elevations dissipate relatively quickly; as of
fourth quarter 2018, the groundwater elevation of GW-19A was approximately 2 to 3 feet above the static level. The influence of the mounding has also been observed in
surrounding wells GW-36, GW-58, and GW-63.
Since November 2009, in accordance with CD10-0015 (EnergySolutions, 2010b), to
reduce the potential downward vertical hydraulic gradient at the GW-19A/19B well pair,
EnergySolutions has extracted groundwater from the southwest pond area mound. As of December 2018, 1.2 million gallons of groundwater had been extracted from the shallow
aquifer and returned to the Southwest Corner Pond. The GW-19A/19B well pair is
hydrologically upgradient of the Clive facility.
Operation of the Southwest Corner Pond was added to the Best Available Technology
(BAT) performance monitoring program on September 8, 2014. The primary performance element is maintenance of the pond freeboard to a level below the spillway
by pumping water from the pond onto the ground in Section 5. After four years of
implementation, EnergySolutions suspects that increases in the groundwater level at GW-
63 may be related to this practice. The BAT requirement is shifting the area of non-
contact surface water infiltration from the Southwest Corner Pond spillway area (Section 6) to the northwest part of Section 5.
GW-29, GW-60, and GW-63 – Beginning in late 2001, non-contact surface water runoff
from the embankments in Section 32 was redirected to flow south under the access road
on the south edge of Section 32 and then west to the southwest pond in a ditch paralleling
the access road. This is the current configuration for drainage of non-contact runoff from Section 32.
Revised Hydrogeologic Report, EnergySolutions – Version 4.0 January 15, 2019
10
As discussed below, infiltration of surface water has occurred in the vicinity of three
wells, GW-29, GW-60 and GW-63, since drainage was redirected.
• GW-29 – In April 2006, a groundwater mound formed near well GW-29 in response to infiltration of surface water in an area where the LARW embankment drainage joined the 11e.(2) ditch. The culvert between LARW and 11e.(2) was replaced in
May 2006, and the groundwater elevation at GW-29 rapidly decreased for the next
several months. Since that time, the elevation at GW-29 has increased seasonally at
times in response to the presence of water in the nearby ditch. The water level dissipates relatively rapidly during the summer, and it is a localized effect, as a long-term groundwater mound is not observed.
• GW-60 – Well GW-60 is located adjacent to the south ditch and is also near a lift
station constructed in late summer 2009. Water elevations at GW-60 have fluctuated from 2003 to present due to localized recharge associated with the drainage system. Elevations have increased rapidly following large precipitation events. Peak
elevations of 3 to 9 feet above static have been observed. Water elevations at GW-60
also decrease rapidly. Since construction of the lift station, EnergySolutions has
actively removed water collecting in the station to prevent infiltration.
• GW-63 – Well GW-63 is located adjacent to the south ditch, approximately half way from the lift station to the Southwest Corner Pond. Water elevations at GW-63
increased beginning in early 2004 presumably due to localized recharge associated
with the south ditch. Unlike well GW-60, changes in groundwater levels at GW-63
are more muted. As discussed above, pumping non-contact surface water from the Southwest Corner Pond onto the ground in Section 5 may impact the groundwater
level at Well GW-63.
Surface water recharge of the shallow aquifer in the area of wells GW-29 and GW-60 has
contributed to northerly and westerly groundwater flow and higher gradients in the
immediate vicinity of the wells. Based on rapid water elevation changes in GW-29 and GW-60 and muted elevation increases in adjacent wells, the volume of water contributing
to the mounding is suspected of being substantially less relative to the southwest pond
area mound and the older 11e.(2) area mound. Similar recharge from the south ditch may
be occurring in the vicinity of well GW-63; however, mounding at GW-63 may also be
related to surface water recharge from the Southwest Corner Pond, including pumping water onto the ground surface in Section 5.
With the exception of some temporal changes associated with localized areas discussed
above, groundwater flow direction, gradient, and velocity are comparable to those
presented in earlier hydrogeologic reports (Bingham Environmental, 1991 and 1996;
Pentacore, 2000; Envirocare, 2004; EnergySolutions, 2013). With the exceptions discussed above, there are no evident time-related trends in groundwater flow in the
shallow aquifer. Observed mounding has not changed significantly since reported in the
previous Revised Hydrogeological Report.
Revised Hydrogeologic Report, EnergySolutions – Version 4.0 January 15, 2019
11
5.2.4.2 Deep aquifer
Using data from fourth quarter 2018 (Table 4), an unadjusted saline and fresh water
equivalent head elevation contour map for the deep aquifer is presented as Figure 17.
Differences between the saline and fresh water equivalent contours reflect the conversion using specific gravity measurements. Comparison of the contours illustrates the
sensitivity of fresh water equivalent elevations to specific gravity measurement.
Similar to the shallow aquifer, groundwater flow in the deep aquifer is toward the
northeast (Figure 17). The average fresh water equivalent deep-aquifer horizontal
hydraulic gradient is 2.56E-04 ft/ft for fourth quarter 2018 (Table 5). Corresponding average linear velocity estimates for horizontal flow in the deep aquifer range from
7.99E-04 to 2.82E-03 ft/day, which are similar but slightly slower than estimates for the
shallow aquifer (Table 5).
Groundwater flow direction, gradient, and velocity for the deep aquifer are generally
comparable to those presented in earlier hydrogeologic reports (Bingham Environmental, 1991 and 1996; Pentacore, 2000; Envirocare, 2004; EnergySolutions, 2013). There are
no evident time-related trends in groundwater flow in the deep aquifer.
5.2.5. Vertical Groundwater Flow
Vertical groundwater gradient and velocity were estimated by comparing the potential
head between monitor wells completed in the shallow and deep aquifers at the midpoint of the saturated filter packs. The vertical hydraulic conductivity was assumed to be
8.2E-04 ft/day (2.9E-07 cm/sec), the arithmetic mean of data presented in Section 5.2.2.
The porosity was assumed to be 0.29, the value used in previous disposal cell infiltration
and transport modeling (Whetstone Associates 2011 and 2012). Vertical hydraulic
gradient and velocity calculations for fourth quarter 2018 are shown in Table 6. A downward vertical gradient is calculated for well pairs GW-19A/19B and GW-27/27D,
the result of mounding in the shallow aquifer discussed in Section 5.2.4.1. An upward
gradient is calculated for the other well pairs: I-1-30/100, I-3-30/100, and GW-139/139D.
Estimated vertical velocities are very low: ranging from 3.70E-05 ft/day upward to
1.23E-04 ft/day downward for saline data, and 4.07E-05 ft/day upward to 8.55E-05 ft/day downward for fresh water equivalent data (Table 6).
The low magnitude of the vertical gradient beneath the facility indicates that the shallow
and deep aquifers are likely subsets of a continuous aquifer system separated by low-
conductivity clay strata, and that vertical flow is not significant either upward or
downward. Except for relatively recent changes to localized areas of mounding in the shallow aquifer discussed in Section 5.2.4.1, vertical gradients and groundwater flow are
comparable to those presented in previous reports (Bingham Environmental, 1991 and
1996; Pentacore, 2000; Envirocare, 2004; EnergySolutions, 2013). There are no other
evident time-related trends in vertical groundwater gradient or velocity.
Revised Hydrogeologic Report, EnergySolutions – Version 4.0 January 15, 2019
12
5.2.6. Deeper Hydrostratigraphic Units
The hydrostratigraphy of water-bearing units below the deep aquifer has been
characterized by the installation of EnergySolutions’ water-supply well and the Section
29 exploratory borehole. The logs for both are provided in Appendix A. Although discussed elsewhere in this report, this section provides a summary of the available
information for units below the deep aquifer.
• Production Well – This well, installed in late 1969, is located approximately 3 miles
north-northwest of the Clive Facility. The driller’s log describes the stratigraphy as unconsolidated clay, sand, and gravel to a depth of 350 feet bgs. Sandstone units are listed in the log; these may be cemented sand units (similar to caliche). The borehole
did not encounter bedrock. The static groundwater level listed in the log is 53 feet
bgs. A pump test determined the well was capable of producing 600 gallons per
minute with 120 feet of drawdown after 10 hours of testing. Recent sampling indicates the water quality is saline, with a total dissolved solids (TDS) concentration of 49,800 milligrams per liter (mg/L) (Section 5.2.7).
• Section 29 Exploratory Borehole – This borehole, drilled in January 1996, was
located 500 feet north and 3,800 feet east from the southwest corner of Section 29. The driller’s log describes the stratigraphy as unconsolidated clay, sand, and gravel to a depth of 620 feet bgs. A sandstone unit is listed in the log, and as above, this may
be a cemented sand unit. The borehole did not encounter bedrock (Section 4.0). The
static water level is listed in the log as 84 feet bgs. Fresh water was not encountered
in the borehole (Section 5.1).
5.2.7. Groundwater Chemistry
Groundwater chemistry for the Clive facility is summarized in this section. More
detailed information on groundwater chemistry is presented in the Comprehensive
Groundwater Quality Evaluation Report, which was submitted to DWMRC under
separate cover.
Groundwater at the site is extremely saline. In the shallow aquifer, the TDS concentration ranges from 14,786 to 60,718 mg/L. The site-wide average of 2018 (or most recently
available) TDS data is 40,297 mg/L. Average TDS from 1991 to December 2018 for
wells completed in the shallow aquifer is included as Table 7, and the spatial distribution
is shown on Figure 18. Few TDS data are available for the deep aquifer. Mayo and Associates (1999) and Bingham Environmental (1996) indicate that the TDS of the deep aquifer is less than that of the shallow aquifer, but is greater than 20,000 mg/L. On May
13, 2015, EnergySolutions sampled deeper groundwater from its production well located
approximately 3 miles north-northwest of the Clive Facility (Section 5.2.6). The well is
perforated from 185 to 350 feet bgs. The TDS concentration of production well groundwater sample was 49,800 mg/L.
Revised Hydrogeologic Report, EnergySolutions – Version 4.0 January 15, 2019
13
Specific gravity is also an indicator of the relative salinity of groundwater samples. For
2018, in the shallow aquifer, specific gravity ranged from 1.002 to 1.048, averaging
1.030. Specific gravity in the deep aquifer is somewhat lower, and ranged from 1.002 to
1.020, with an average of 1.014 for 2018 (Table 4). The higher salinity of the shallow aquifer is likely due to: (1) concentration of salts through evapotranspiration, and/or (2)
localized dissolution of evaporate deposits in the unsaturated soil in areas of local vertical
recharge from the ground surface (such as near GW-19A in response to infiltration of
non-contact surface water).
The TDS data were used to evaluate the stability of hydrogeologic conditions at each well. The most recent result was compared to the average TDS for each well. The most
recent result differed from the average by 20 percent or more for the following wells:
GW-19A, GW-24, GW-29, GW-60, GW-63, GW-92, GW-99, and I-1-30. Most of these
wells are located in areas where focused recharge of the shallow aquifer by non-contact
surface water has occurred (Section 5.2.4.1). This would include GW-19A, GW-24, GW-29, GW-60, GW-63, and GW-92. For these wells, the most recent TDS is less than
the historical average TDS. The reason for increase in TDS at GW-99 and I-1-30 is not
known. Water elevations at these wells have been stable, and compliance parameters
have not exceeded protection levels.
TDS and specific gravity measurements are comparable to those presented in previous reports (Bingham Environmental, 1991 and 1996; Pentacore, 2000; Envirocare, 2004;
EnergySolutions, 2013) except at those monitoring wells affected by local infiltration.
Other than the wells noted above, there are no other evident lateral or time-related trends
in TDS or salinity across the facility.
Sodium and chloride dominate the major ion composition of shallow groundwater beneath the facility. On average, sodium typically constitutes up to about 90 percent of
the total cations by weight, with lesser amounts of calcium, potassium, and magnesium.
Chloride comprises approximately 86 percent of the anions; the remainder is primarily
sulfate. Carbonate and bicarbonate are negligible (Mayo and Associates, 1999). A
review of major ion data collected since the previous Revised Hydrogeologic Report revealed no significant time-related changes since 2011, including variability related to
the recharge and mounding discussed previously. There are no evident lateral or time-
related trends in major ion chemistry across the facility. The major-ion chemistry
discussion above is also applicable to deeper groundwater sampled at EnergySolutions’
production well, located approximately 3 miles north-northwest of the Clive Facility.
Bingham Environmental (1996) performed an analysis of stable and unstable isotope data
to characterize groundwater recharge sources, groundwater age, and groundwater
geochemical evolution. The evaluation indicated that groundwater in the shallow aquifer
beneath the south central, southwestern, and west central margins of the facility (wells
GW-18, GW-19A, GW-3, respectively) appears to have been subjected to excessive evaporation prior to recharge. Bingham Environmental concluded that recharge of
surface water that had been concentrated by evaporation most likely occurred at some
distance from the facility. Groundwater age dating using tritium indicated that most
Revised Hydrogeologic Report, EnergySolutions – Version 4.0 January 15, 2019
14
groundwater beneath the facility was recharged prior to 1953. The geochemical evolution
study evaluated major ions primarily using Piper and Stiff diagrams, and found that
except for TDS, the ionic composition of the shallow and deep aquifers were comparable.
Although the deep aquifer was more dilute, the concentration ratios of major constituents were very similar in both aquifers. The study also indicated that the ionic composition of
groundwater at the facility was consistent with very slow horizontal flow rates.
Groundwater beneath the facility is classified as a Class IV saline groundwater under the
State of Utah Groundwater Quality Protection Regulations standards for TDS (exceeding
10,000 mg/L) (UAC, 2018). Naturally occurring concentrations of many dissolved constituents (e.g., arsenic, selenium, thallium, radium, and uranium) exceed U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency and Utah State drinking water standards (Mayo and
Associates, 1999; Bingham Environmental, 1996; EnergySolutions, 2014).
6. Summary and Conclusions
This revised Hydrogeologic Report for the Clive facility provides hydrogeologic
information relevant to the renewal of EnergySolutions’ GWQDP No. UGW450005.
This report updates the information and interpretations provided in previous
Hydrogeologic Reports, and it incorporates data collected since 2011 into the understanding of the facility hydrogeology.
Groundwater flow direction, gradient, and velocity in the shallow and deep aquifers are
generally comparable to those presented in earlier hydrogeologic reports. With the
localized exceptions discussed in this report, there are no evident spatial or time-related
trends in groundwater flow in the shallow aquifer. There are no evident spatial or time-related trends in groundwater flow in the deep aquifer.
Revised Hydrogeologic Report, EnergySolutions – Version 4.0 January 15, 2019
15
7. References
Adrian Brown Consultants, 1997. Final Slug Test Results, Envirocare of Utah South Clive Facility, Tooele County, Utah, unpublished consultants report.
Bingham Environmental Inc., 1996. Revised Hydrogeologic Report, unpublished
consultants report.
Bingham Environmental Inc., 1995. Additional Information for Suction Lysimeters and Soil Resistivity Instruments, unpublished consultants report.
Bingham Environmental Inc., 1993. As-Built for Suction Lysimeters and Soil Resistivity
Instruments, unpublished consultants report.
Bingham Environmental Inc., 1991. Hydrogeologic Report, unpublished consultants
report.
Black, B.D., B.J. Solomon, and K.M. Harty, 1999. Geology and Geologic Hazards of Tooele Valley and the West Desert Hazardous Industry Area, Tooele County, Utah;
Special Study 96, Utah Geological Survey.
Dames and Moore et al., 1987. Site Proposal for the Superconducting Supercollider,
Proposal Appendix A, Geotechnical Report, Volume 2.
Dames and Moore, 1982. Environmental Impact Statement, Remedial Action at the Former Vitro Chemical Company Millsite.
Doelling, H.H., B.J. Solomon, and S.F. Davies, 1994. Geologic Map of the Grayback
Hills Quadrangle, Tooele Co., Utah, Utah Geological Survey Map 166.
EarthFax, 2009. Report for Slug Withdrawal Testing at EnergySolutions’ Clive, Utah Facility, October 16, 2009; unpublished consultants report Submitted to UDWQ and UDSHW on October 28, 2009 (CD097-0290).
EarthFax, 2007. Report for Slug Withdrawal Testing at Envirocare’s Clive, Utah
Facility, October 1, 2007; unpublished consultants report Submitted to UDWQ on
October 8, 2007 (CD07-0332).
EarthFax, 2006. Report for Slug Withdrawal Testing at Envirocare’s Clive, Utah Facility, January 16, 2006; unpublished consultants report Submitted to UDWQ on
January 23, 2006 (CD06-0024).
EarthFax, 1999. Final Report for Slug Withdrawal Testing at Envirocare’s Clive, Utah
Facility, unpublished consultants report.
Revised Hydrogeologic Report, EnergySolutions – Version 4.0 January 15, 2019
16
EnergySolutions, 2014. Comprehensive Groundwater Quality Evaluation Report –
Waste Disposal Facility, Clive, Utah, submitted to UDRC on March 19, 2014 (CD14-
0066).
EnergySolutions, 2013. Revised Hydrogeologic Report – Waste Disposal Facility, Clive, Utah, Version 3.1, submitted to UDRC on December 2, 2013 (CD13-0336).
EnergySolutions, 2010a. Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity Test Data from Monitoring
Well GW-139D, submitted to UDRC on March 16, 2010 (CD10-0077).
EnergySolutions, 2010b. Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit Number UGW450005, Part I.I.3: Submittal of Plan and Schedule for Groundwater Mound Dewatering Near Wells GW-19A/GW-19B, submitted to UDRC on January 14, 2010 (CD10-0015).
EnergySolutions, 2009. Vertical Hydraulic Gradient Work Plan and Well Spacing
Analyses for Class A North and Mixed Waste Embankments, submitted to UDRC on
March 13, 2009 (CD09-0067).
Envirocare of Utah, Inc., 2004. Revised Hydrogeologic Report, Version 2.0, August 2004, unpublished report.
Mayo and Associates, 1999. Compilation and Analysis of Envirocare Groundwater
Data, unpublished consultants report.
Meteorological Solutions, Inc. (MSI), 2018. January 2017 Through December 2017 and January 1993 Through 2017 Summary Report of Meteorological Data Collected at the EnergySolutions’ Clive, Utah Facility, February 2018, unpublished consultants report.
Pentacore Resources, 1999. Differential Leveling Survey for Envirocare of Utah,
unpublished consultants report.
Pentacore Resources, 2000. Revised Hydrogeologic Report for the Envirocare Waste Disposal Facility Clive, Utah, unpublished consultants report.
Shrum, D., 1999. Verbal communication between Daniel B. Shrum (Envirocare of Utah)
and Robert Ferry (Pentacore Resources), September 27, 1999.
Solomon, B.J., 1993, Quaternary Geologic Maps of Tooele Valley and the West Desert
Hazardous Industry Area, Utah Geological Survey Open File Report 296.
Stephens, J.C., 1974. Hydrogeologic Reconnaissance of the Northern Great Salt Lake Desert and Summary Reconnaissance of Northwestern Utah, Utah Department of Natural
Resources Technical Publication No. 42.
Stephens, D.B., 1993. Laboratory Analysis of Soil Hydraulic Properties of TP-1-4B and
TP-2-4W Soil Samples, unpublished consultants report.
Revised Hydrogeologic Report, EnergySolutions – Version 4.0 January 15, 2019
17
Utah Administrative Code (UAC) 2018. R317-6-3. Ground Water Classes.
Whetstone Associates, Inc., 2011. EnergySolutions Class A West Disposal Cell
Infiltration and Transport Modeling Report. April 19, 2011.
Whetstone Associates, Inc., 2012. EnergySolutions LARW Disposal Cell Updated Infiltration and Transport Modeling Report. May 2012.
Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc., 2012. EnergySolutions Petrographic Studies of
Aggregate, unpublished consultants report. May 16, 2012.

Tables
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL, BOREHOLE AND LYSIMETER INFORMATIONENERGYSOLUTIONS, LLC.
T1-1
Location Type Date Installed DateAbandoned (ft)(ft)Elevation Point Elev.
GW-1 (a)Monitoring well (a)3/3/1988 (a)na 7,420,941.63 (d)1,191,843.39 (d)4,273.00 (d)4,275.06 (d)41.5 (a)18.0 (a)40.0 (a)20.0 (a)40.0 (a)Yes (a)No
GW-2 (a)Monitoring well (a)3/4/1988 (a)10/23/2000 7,422,436.62 (d)1,195,089.49 (d)4,277.90 (d)4,279.98 (d)41.5 (a)18.0 (a)40.0 (a)20.0 (a)40.0 (a)Yes (a)No
GW-3 (a)Monitoring well (a)3/2/1988 (a)na 7,423,679.66 (d)1,190,158.31 (d)4,271.00 (d)4,273.14 (d)41.5 (a)18.0 (a)40.0 (a)20.0 (a)40.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (d)
GW-4 (a)Monitoring well (a)1988 (m)8/2/2011 (n)7,422,956.04 (d)1,193,044.10 (d)4,274.30 (d)4,276.57 (d)40.0 (g)18.0 (d)40.0 (d)20.0 (a)40.0 (a)No No
GW-5 (a)Monitoring well (a)3/8/1988 (a)Nov. 1-2, 1999 (k)7,424,387.85 (d)1,192,532.80 (d)4,276.60 (d)4,278.64 (d)41.5 (a)18.0 (a)40.0 (a)20.0 (a)40.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (d)
GW-6 (a)Monitoring well (a)3/4/1988 (a)10/23/2000 7,424,752.04 (d)1,195,169.70 (d)4,279.80 (d)4,282.01 (d)41.5 (a)18.0 (a)40.0 (a)20.0 (a)40.0 (a)Yes (a)No
GW-7 (a)Monitoring well (a)Not available prior to 1989 (a)Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available No No
GW-8 (a)Monitoring well (a)3/8/1988 (a)Nov. 1-2, 1999 (k)7,426,080.76 (d)1,193,284.01 (d)4,280.00 (d)4,282.03 (d)41.5 (a)18.0 (a)40.0 (a)20.0 (a)40.0 (a)Yes (a)No
GW-9 (a)Monitoring well (a)6/9/1988 (a)8/2/2011 (n)7,425,690.56 (d)1,192,668.61 (d)4,278.80 (d)4,281.47 (d)40.0 (a)18.0 (a)40.0 (a)20.0 (a)40.0 (a)Yes (a)No
GW-10 (a)Monitoring well (a)6/10/1988 (a)prior to 1989 (a)Not available Not available Not available Not available 40.0 (a)18.0 (a)40.0 (a)20.0 (a)40.0 (a)Yes (a)No
GW-11 (a)Monitoring well (d)6/13/1990 (d)June-July 1994 (d)7,421,598.92 (d)1,193,905.19 (d)4,276.60 (d)4,280.17 (d)55.0 (g)44.0 (d)55.0 (d)45.0 (a)55.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (d)
GW-12 (d)Monitoring well (d)6/15/1990 (d)June-July 1994 (d)7,421,641.02 (d)1,194,094.39 (d)4,276.90 (d)4,279.95 (d)55.0 (g)42.0 (d)55.0 (d)44.0 (a)54.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (d)
GW-13 (d)Monitoring well (d)6/19/1990 (d)June-July 1994 (d)7,421,625.12 (d)1,194,416.59 (d)4,277.20 (d)4,280.11 (d)55.0 (g)40.0 (d)55.0 (d)45.0 (a)55.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (d)
GW-16 (a)Monitoring well (a)2/12/1991 (a)8/2/2011 (n)7,423,012.93 (d)1,193,929.69 (d)4,277.56 (d)4,279.76 (d)41.0 (a)20.3 (d)41.0 (d)23.5 (a)38.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (d)
GW-16R (a)Monitoring well (a)2/4/1993 (a)na 7,422,886.15 (e)1,193,930.12 (e)4,279.64 (c)4,281.12 (p)36.0 (a,h)20.0 (a)36.0 (a,h)26.0 (a)36.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (j)
GW-17A (a)Monitoring well (a)2/8/1991 (a)8/2/2011 (n)7,423,170.34 (d)1,192,628.40 (d)4,276.53 (d)4,278.64 (d)34.5 (a)18.8 (d)34.5 (d)23.5 (a)33.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (dj)
GW-18 (d)Monitoring well (d)2/9/1991 (d)Nov. 1-2, 1999 (k)7,420,946.23 (d)1,192,620.49 (d)4,274.30 (d)4,276.61 (d)39.2 (g)18.5 (d)39.2 (d)23.5 (a)38.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (d)
GW-19A (a)Monitoring well (a)2/7/1991 (a)na 7,421,006.61 (e)1,189,865.77 (e)4,269.37 (c)4,270.79 (p)31.5 (a)14.8 (d)31.5 (d)18.0 (a)28.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (dj)
GW-19B (a)Monitoring well (a)2/6/1991 (a)na 7,420,998.79 (e)1,189,865.43 (e)4,269.14 (c)4,270.69 (p)102.0 (a)75.0 (a)102.0 (a)78.5 (a)98.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (d)
GW-20 (a)Monitoring well (a)12/2/1991 (a)na 7,421,987.90 (e)1,192,618.31 (e)4,275.29 (c)4,276.60 (p)35.0 (a)21.0 (a)35.0 (a)25.0 (a)35.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (dj)GW-21 (a)Monitoring well (a)2/13/1991 (a)5/5/2010 7,426,126.45 (d)1,195,203.30 (d)4,280.50 (d)4,283.23 (d)44.5 (a)21.0 (a)42.0 (a)27.0 (a)42.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (dj)GW-22 (a)Monitoring well (a)12/5/1991 (a)na 7,422,929.33 (e)1,193,464.04 (e)4,276.39 (c)4,277.25 (p)32.0 (a)19.0 (a)32.0 (a)22.0 (a)32.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (dj)GW-23 (a)Monitoring well (a)12/5/1991 (a)na 7,422,934.23 (e)1,193,053.95 (e)4,275.31 (c)4,276.63 (p)32.0 (a)18.0 (a)32.0 (a)22.0 (a)32.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (dj)
GW-24 (a)Monitoring well (a)12/3/1991 (a)na 7,422,837.38 (e)1,192,637.60 (e)4,275.50 (c)4,276.69 (p)31.8 (d)20.2 (d)31.8 (d)22.0 (a)32.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (dj)
GW-25 (a)Monitoring well (a)12/19/1991 (a)na 7,423,062.44 (e)1,191,654.56 (e)4,274.52 (c)4,276.24 (p)34.0 (a)22.0 (a)34.0 (a)24.0 (a)34.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (dj)
GW-26 (a)Monitoring well (a)12/20/1991 (a)na 7,423,075.51 (e)1,190,915.72 (e)4,272.91 (c)4,274.67 (p)30.0 (a)18.0 (a)30.0 (a)20.0 (a)30.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (dj)
GW-27 (a)Monitoring well (e)12/11/1991 (a)na 7,423,095.22 (e)1,190,080.81 (e)4,270.72 (c)4,272.43 (p)32.0 (a)18.2 (d)30.1 (d)20.0 (a)30.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (dj)
GW-27D (e)Monitoring well (a)12/29/1998 (a)na 7,423,070.55 (e)1,190,080.11 (e)4,270.88 (c)4,273.67 (p)100.0 (a)81.0 (a)100.0 (a)85.0 (a)100.0 (a)Yes (a)No
GW-28 (a)Monitoring well (a)12/17/1991 (a)na 7,422,151.53 (e)1,190,065.60 (e)4,269.91 (c)4,271.26 (p)30.0 (a)18.0 (a)30.0 (a)20.0 (a)30.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (dj)
GW-29 (a)Monitoring well (a)11/26/1991 (a)na 7,421,099.03 (e)1,192,603.44 (e)4,274.71 (c)4,276.32 (p)32.0 (a)19.8 (d)32.0 (d)22.0 (a)32.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (dj)
GW-36 (a)Monitoring well (a)12/23/1991 (a)na 7,421,641.78 (e)1,190,700.53 (e)4,270.25 (c)4,272.09 (p)30.0 (a)18.0 (a)30.0 (a)20.0 (a)30.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (dj)
GW-37 (a)Monitoring well (a)12/17/1991 (a)na 7,422,025.00 (e)1,191,257.41 (e)4,269.30 (c)4,270.88 (p)32.0 (a)17.2 (d)29.8 (d)20.0 (a)30.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (dj)
GW-38 (a)Monitoring well (a)12/24/1991 (a)June 2000 7,422,386.18 (e)1,191,826.23 (e)4,271.34 (c)4,273.42 (c)32.0 (a)18.0 (d)29.8 (d)20.0 (a)30.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (dj)
GW-38R (a)Monitoring well (a)6/13/2000 (a)na 7,422,366.42 (a)1,191,229.26 (a)4,272.52 (a)4,275.70 (p)34.0 (a)21.0 (a)34.0 (a)24.0 (a)34.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (a)
GW-41 (a)Monitoring well (a)2/12/1992 (a)8/3/2011 (n)7,421,380.21 (e)1,194,864.47 (e)4,277.58 (c)4,279.48 (p)38.0 (a)18.5 (a)36.0 (a)20.5 (a)35.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (dj)
GW-42 (a)Monitoring well (a)2/13/1992 (a)8/3/2011 (n)7,421,519.55 (e)1,194,867.34 (e)4,278.16 (d)4,279.28 (p)36.0 (c)18.0 (a)36.0 (a)20.5 (a)35.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (dj)
GW-43 (a)Monitoring well (a)2/14/1992 (a)Sep. 4-5, 1997 7,421,638.00 (d)1,194,751.99 (d)4,278.20 (d)4,280.42 (d)38.0 (a)18.5 (a)36.0 (a)21.0 (a)36.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (dj)
GW-44 (a)Monitoring well (a)2/17/1992 (a)Sep. 4-5, 1997 7,421,630.92 (d)1,194,572.99 (d)4,277.30 (d)4,279.14 (d)38.0 (a)18.0 (a)36.0 (a)20.5 (a)35.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (dj)
GW-45 (a)Monitoring well (a)2/18/1992 (a)5/13/2000 7,421,633.98 (e)1,194,423.48 (e)4,277.74 (c)4,279.50 (c)36.0 (a)18.5 (a)36.0 (a)20.5 (a)35.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (dj)
GW-46 (a)Monitoring well (a)2/25/1992 (a)5/13/2000 7,421,641.34 (e)1,194,277.77 (e)4,277.65 (c)4,279.50 (c)36.0 (a)18.0 (a)36.0 (a)20.5 (a)35.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (dj)
GW-55 (a)Monitoring well (a)2/26/1992 (a)8/3/2011 (n)7,421,555.67 (e)1,194,061.09 (e)4,278.20 (c)4,279.95 (c)25.0 (a)18.0 (a)25.0 (a)20.0 (a)25.0 (a)Yes (a)No
GW-56 (a)Monitoring well (a)3/16/1992 (a)8/26/1994 (d)7,422,577.33 (d)1,194,037.19 (d)4,275.90 (d)4,278.05 (d)34.0 (a)18.6 (d)34.0 (d)24.0 (a)34.0 (a)Yes (a)No
GW-56R (a)Monitoring well (a)2/5/1993 (a)na 7,422,491.03 (e)1,193,953.77 (e)4,277.63 (c)4,279.19 (p)35.0 (a)18.0 (a)35.0 (a)25.0 (a)35.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (j)
GW-57 (a)Monitoring well (a)3/18/1992 (a)na 7,422,627.94 (e)1,190,073.44 (e)4,269.97 (c)4,271.88 (p)30.0 (a)17.4 (d)30.0 (d)20.0 (a)30.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (j)
GW-58 (a)Monitoring well (a)3/19/1992 (a)na 7,421,678.41 (e)1,190,085.55 (e)4,269.65 (c)4,271.38 (p)30.0 (a)18.5 (d)30.0 (d)20.0 (a)30.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (j)GW-60 (a)Monitoring well (a)2/2/1993 (a)na 7,420,942.07 (e)1,191,833.12 (e)4,273.03 (c)4,274.79 (p)28.0 (a)19.5 (a)28.0 (d)22.5 (a)27.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (j)GW-63 (a)Monitoring well (a)7/7/1993 (a)na 7,420,970.03 (e)1,190,938.09 (e)4,270.22 (c)4,272.04 (p)30.0 (a)17.5 (a)30.0 (a)20.0 (a)30.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (j)GW-64 (a)Monitoring well (a)9/29/1993 (a)na 7,421,622.43 (e)1,193,905.40 (e)4,277.26 (c)4,278.96 (p)35.0 (a)22.0 (a)35.0 (a)25.0 (a)35.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (j)
GW-66 (a)Monitoring well (a)6/15/1994 (a)August 2005 7,421,248.10 (e)1,194,169.52 (e)4,277.51 (c)4,279.62 (c)35.0 (a)16.5 (a)35.0 (a)19.5 (a)34.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (j)
GW-66R (a)Monitoring well (a)9/1/2005 (a)na 7,421,240.07 (p)1,194,183.80 (p)4,278.43 (a)4,281.77 (p)40.0 (a)23.0 (a)40.0 (a)25.0 (a)40.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (r)
GW-67 (a)Monitoring well (a)9/24/1996 (a)8/4/2011 (n)7,421,682.09 (e)1,194,875.41 (e)4,278.15 (c)4,282.16 (p)39.0 (a)20.0 (a)39.0 (a)22.0 (a)37.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (j)
GW-67R (a)Monitoring well (a)11/14/1998 (a)8/4/2011 (n)7,421,676.40 (e)1,194,881.96 (e)4,278.19 (c)4,281.49 (c)39.0 (a)27.0 (a)39.0 (a)29.0 (a)39.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (ij)
GW-68 (a)Monitoring well (a)9/23/1996 (a)8/4/2011 (n)7,421,830.45 (e)1,194,878.83 (e)4,279.27 (c)4,282.38 (p)39.0 (a)22.0 (a)39.0 (a)24.0 (a)39.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (i)
GW-68R (a)Monitoring well (a)11/14/1998 (a)8/4/2011 (n)7,421,826.09 (e)1,194,885.15 (e)4,279.29 (c)4,282.25 (c)39.0 (a)22.0 (a)39.0 (a)24.0 (a)39.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (ij)
GW-69 (a)Monitoring well (a)9/20/1996 (a)8/4/2011 (n)7,421,980.71 (e)1,194,882.43 (e)4,277.99 (c)4,281.63 (p)37.5 (a)25.0 (a)37.5 (a)27.0 (a)37.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (ij)
GW-69R (a)Monitoring well (a)11/15/1998 (a)8/4/2011 (n)7,421,973.55 (e)1,194,889.16 (e)4,278.69 (c)4,281.59 (c)39.0 (a)22.0 (a)39.0 (a)24.0 (a)39.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (ij)
GW-70 (a)Monitoring well (e)9/19/1996 (a)8/4/2011 (n)7,422,131.80 (e)1,194,886.53 (e)4,278.76 (c)4,282.05 (p)40.0 (a)27.0 (a)40.0 (a)29.0 (a)39.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (i)
GW-71 (a)Monitoring well (e)9/20/1996 (a)4/28/2003 7,422,240.80 (e)1,194,749.71 (a)4,278.44 (c)4,281.70 (c)40.0 (a)23.0 (a)40.0 (a)25.0 (a)40.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (j)
GW-75 (a)Monitoring well (a)4/23/1997 (a)Jan. 22-23, 1998 (f)7,421,006.82 (e)1,193,911.79 (a)4,276.25 (a)4,279.01 (a)31.3 (a)18.0 (a)31.3 (a)21.3 (a)31.3 (a)Yes (a)Yes (ij)
GW-76 (a)Monitoring well (a)4/23/1997 (a)Jan. 22-23, 1998 (f)7,420,983.52 (e)1,193,284.49 (e)4,274.94 (a)4,278.01 (a)33.1 (a)20.0 (a)33.1 (a)23.1 (a)33.1 (a)Yes (a)Yes (ij)
GW-77 (a)Monitoring well (a)1/23/1998 (a)na 7,421,068.44 (e)1,193,899.00 (e)4,279.54 (c)4,282.96 (p)40.0 (a)27.0 (a)40.0 (a)29.0 (a)39.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (j)
GW-78 (a)Monitoring well (a)1/23/1998 (a)Nov. 1-2, 1999 (k)7,421,063.00 (e)1,193,284.42 (e)4,278.37 (c)4,281.41 (c)40.0 (a)26.9 (a)40.0 (a)29.0 (a)39.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (i)
Total depthof boring(ft bgs)
Well/boring
log?
Hydraulic
test?of filter pack(ft bgs)of filter pack(ft bgs)screened interval(ft bgs)screened interval(ft bgs)
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL, BOREHOLE AND LYSIMETER INFORMATIONENERGYSOLUTIONS, LLC.
T1-2
Location Type Date Installed DateAbandoned (ft)(ft)Elevation Point Elev.of boring(ft bgs)
Well/boring
log?
Hydraulic
test?of filter pack(ft bgs)of filter pack(ft bgs)screened interval(ft bgs)screened interval(ft bgs)
GW-79 (a)Monitoring well (a)7/20/1998 (a)4/28/2003 7,422,255.10 (e)1,194,478.91 (e)4,277.10 (c)4,279.85 (c)34.0 (a)17.0 (a)34.0 (a)19.0 (a)34.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (i)
GW-80 (a)Monitoring well (a)7/20/1998 (a)4/28/2003 7,422,261.87 (e)1,194,302.36 (e)4,273.58 (c)4,275.85 (c)34.0 (a)17.0 (a)34.0 (a)19.0 (a)34.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (i)
GW-81 (a)Monitoring well (a)7/14/1998 (a)11/3/2017 7,424,662.47 (e)1,190,444.48 (e)4,274.18 (c)4,276.78 (p)34.0 (a)17.0 (a)34.0 (a)19.0 (a)34.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (i)
GW-82 (a)Monitoring well (a)7/13/1998 (a)11/3/2017 7,424,655.44 (e)1,190,775.68 (e)4,274.35 (c)4,276.81 (p)34.0 (a)17.0 (a)34.0 (a)19.0 (a)34.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (i)
GW-83 (a)Monitoring well (a)7/13/1998 (a)11/2/2017 7,424,649.14 (e)1,191,105.08 (e)4,274.51 (c)4,276.90 (p)34.0 (a)17.0 (a)34.0 (a)19.0 (a)34.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (i)
GW-84 (a)Monitoring well (a)7/13/1998 (a)9/11/2018 7,424,642.69 (e)1,191,437.94 (e)4,274.78 (c)4,277.29 (p)34.0 (a)17.0 (a)34.0 (a)19.0 (a)34.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (i)
GW-85 (a)Monitoring well (a)7/10/1998 (a)9/11/2018 7,424,636.30 (e)1,191,761.35 (e)4,275.16 (c)4,277.88 (p)34.0 (a)17.0 (a)34.0 (a)19.0 (a)34.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (i)
GW-86 (a)Monitoring well (a)7/9/1998 (a)9/11/2018 7,424,628.93 (e)1,192,157.49 (e)4,275.83 (c)4,278.15 (p)39.0 (a)21.4 (a)39.0 (a)23.4 (a)38.4 (a)Yes (a)Yes (i)
GW-88 (a)Monitoring well (a)7/5/1998 (a)na 7,424,621.33 (e)1,192,545.39 (e)4,276.86 (c)4,279.58 (p)34.0 (a)17.0 (a)34.0 (a)19.0 (a)34.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (i)
GW-89 (a)Monitoring well (a)7/15/1998 (a)na 7,424,227.56 (e)1,192,539.83 (e)4,276.85 (c)4,279.35 (p)34.0 (a)17.0 (a)34.0 (a)19.0 (a)34.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (i)
GW-90 (a)Monitoring well (a)7/16/1998 (a)na 7,423,836.34 (e)1,192,533.79 (e)4,276.04 (c)4,278.76 (p)34.0 (a)17.0 (a)34.0 (a)19.0 (a)34.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (i)
GW-91 (a)Monitoring well (a)7/16/1998 (a)na 7,423,441.65 (e)1,192,527.75 (e)4,276.10 (c)4,278.48 (p)34.0 (a)17.0 (a)34.0 (a)19.0 (a)34.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (i)
GW-92 (a)Monitoring well (a)7/16/1998 (a)na 7,423,042.79 (e)1,192,520.84 (e)4,276.35 (c)4,279.05 (p)34.0 (a)17.0 (a)34.0 (a)19.0 (a)34.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (i)
GW-93 (a)Monitoring well (a)7/6/1998 (a)na 7,423,052.61 (e)1,192,133.29 (e)4,275.02 (c)4,277.86 (p)34.0 (a)17.0 (a)34.0 (a)19.0 (a)34.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (i)
GW-94 (a)Monitoring well (a)7/7/1998 (a)na 7,423,068.47 (e)1,191,334.22 (e)4,273.94 (c)4,276.55 (p)34.0 (a)17.0 (a)34.0 (a)19.0 (a)34.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (i)
GW-95 (a)Monitoring well (a)7/7/1998 (a)na 7,423,083.10 (e)1,190,505.53 (e)4,271.57 (c)4,274.63 (p)29.0 (a)12.0 (a)29.0 (a)14.0 (a)29.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (i)
GW-96 (a)Monitoring well (a)7/8/1998 (a)7/23/1998 (f)Not available Not available Not available Not available 29.0 (a)12.0 (a)29.0 (a)14.0 (a)29.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (i)
GW-97 (a)Monitoring well (a)7/8/1998 (a)7/23/1998 (f)Not available Not available Not available Not available 31.0 (a)12.0 (a)30.0 (a)15.0 (a)30.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (i)
GW-98 (a)Monitoring well (a)7/8/1998 (a)7/23/1998 (f)Not available Not available Not available Not available 29.1 (a)12.0 (a)29.1 (a)14.1 (a)29.1 (a)Yes (a)Yes (i)
GW-99 (a)Monitoring well (a)7/17/1998 (a)na 7,423,488.83 (e)1,190,087.39 (e)4,270.89 (c)4,273.71 (p)29.0 (a)12.0 (a)29.0 (a)14.0 (a)29.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (i)GW-100 (a)Monitoring well (a)7/17/1998 (a)na 7,423,881.98 (e)1,190,095.97 (e)4,271.27 (c)4,274.37 (p)29.0 (a)12.0 (a)29.0 (a)14.0 (a)29.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (i)GW-101 (a)Monitoring well (a)7/14/1998 (a)na 7,424,275.34 (e)1,190,104.24 (e)4,272.32 (c)4,275.03 (p)34.0 (a)17.0 (a)34.0 (a)19.0 (a)34.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (i)GW-102 (a)Monitoring well (a)7/14/1998 (a)na 7,424,669.39 (e)1,190,113.09 (e)4,273.17 (c)4,275.47 (p)34.0 (a)17.0 (a)34.0 (a)19.0 (a)34.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (i)
GW-103 (a)Monitoring well (a)8/3/1999 (a)na 7,420,882.14 (a)1,192,748.98 (a)4,275.29 (c)4,278.30 (p)39.0 (a)26.4 (a)39.0 (a)29.0 (a)39.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (i)
GW-104 (a)Monitoring well (a)8/3/1999 (a)na 7,420,874.33 (a)1,193,241.55 (a)4,275.42 (c)4,278.74 (p)39.0 (a)26.5 (a)39.0 (a)29.0 (a)39.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (i)
GW-105 (a)Monitoring well (a)8/2/1999 (a)na 7,420,866.20 (a)1,193,732.00 (a)4,276.23 (c)4,279.22 (p)39.0 (a)26.5 (a)39.0 (a)29.0 (a)39.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (i)
GW-106 (a)Monitoring well (a)4/6/2000 (a)na 7,424,978.39 (a)1,190,205.31 (a)4,273.43 (a)4,276.18 (p)39.0 (a)21.5 (a)39.0 (a)23.5 (a)38.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (a)
GW-107 (a)Monitoring well (a)4/5/2000 (a)na 7,425,371.18 (a)1,190,222.92 (a)4,273.47 (a)4,276.26 (p)39.0 (a)21.5 (a)39.0 (a)23.8 (a)38.8 (a)Yes (a)Yes (a)
GW-108 (a)Monitoring well (a)4/5/2000 (a)na 7,425,717.51 (a)1,190,239.29 (a)4,273.29 (a)4,275.96 (p)39.0 (a)21.5 (a)39.0 (a)24.0 (a)39.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (a)
GW-109 (a)Monitoring well (a)4/4/2000 (a)na 7,425,706.20 (a)1,190,522.23 (a)4,273.90 (a)4,276.46 (p)39.0 (a)21.5 (a)39.0 (a)23.5 (a)38.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (a)
GW-110 (a)Monitoring well (a)4/4/2000 (a)na 7,425,706.41 (a)1,190,849.75 (a)4,274.10 (a)4,276.72 (p)39.0 (a)21.5 (a)39.0 (a)23.5 (a)38.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (a)
GW-111 (a)Monitoring well (a)4/4/2000 (a)na 7,425,681.74 (a)1,191,176.67 (a)4,274.40 (a)4,277.07 (p)39.0 (a)21.5 (a)39.0 (a)23.5 (a)38.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (a)
GW-112 (a)Monitoring well (a)4/3/2000 (a)na 7,425,670.31 (a)1,191,511.61 (a)4,274.76 (a)4,277.40 (p)39.0 (a)21.5 (a)39.0 (a)23.5 (a)38.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (a)
GW-113 (a)Monitoring well (a)4/3/2000 (a)8/2/2011 (n)7,425,625.59 (a)1,191,919.66 (a)4,276.05 (a)4,278.80 (p)39.0 (a)21.5 (a)39.0 (a)23.5 (a)38.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (a)
GW-114 (a)Monitoring well (a)3/31/2000 (a)8/2/2011 (n)7,425,620.16 (a)1,192,069.38 (a)4,276.68 (a)4,279.19 (p)39.0 (a)21.5 (a)39.0 (a)23.5 (a)38.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (a)
GW-115 (a)Monitoring well (a)3/31/2000 (a)8/2/2011 (n)7,425,614.71 (a)1,192,219.40 (a)4,277.03 (a)4,279.87 (p)39.0 (a)21.5 (a)39.0 (a)23.5 (a)38.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (a)
GW-116 (a)Monitoring well (a)3/30/2000 (a)8/2/2011 (n)7,425,609.27 (a)1,192,369.27 (a)4,278.06 (a)4,280.68 (p)39.0 (a)21.5 (a)39.0 (a)23.5 (a)38.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (a)
GW-117 (a)Monitoring well (a)3/30/2000 (a)8/3/2011 (n)7,425,281.20 (a)1,192,572.86 (a)4,277.12 (a)4,279.84 (p)39.0 (a)21.5 (a)39.0 (a)23.5 (a)38.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (a)
GW-118 (a)Monitoring well (a)6/9/2000 (a)8/4/2011 (n)7,422,188.34 (a)1,194,912.87 (a)4,281.35 (a)4,284.32 (p)44.0 (a)26.9 (a)44.0 (a)28.5 (a)43.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (a)
GW-119 (a)Monitoring well (a)6/8/2000 (a)8/4/2011 (n)7,422,337.21 (a)1,194,921.64 (a)4,281.67 (a)4,284.81 (p)44.0 (a)27.1 (a)44.0 (a)28.5 (a)43.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (a)
GW-120 (a)Monitoring well (a)6/7/2000 (a)8/4/2011 (n)7,422,487.08 (a)1,194,927.38 (a)4,282.77 (a)4,285.73 (p)44.0 (a)26.1 (a)44.0 (a)28.5 (a)43.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (a)
GW-121 (a)Monitoring well (a)6/7/2000 (a)8/1/2011 (n)7,422,636.37 (a)1,194,934.41 (a)4,282.94 (a)4,286.14 (p)44.0 (a)26.9 (a)44.0 (a)28.5 (a)43.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (a)
GW-122 (a)Monitoring well (a)6/9/2000 (a)8/1/2011 (n)7,422,736.84 (a)1,194,936.90 (a)4,282.98 (a)4,286.25 (p)44.0 (a)26.0 (a)44.0 (a)28.5 (a)43.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (a)
GW-123 (a)Monitoring well (a)6/6/2000 (a)10/23/2000 7,422,741.22 (a)1,194,707.23 (a)4,285.71 (a)4,289.21 (a)49.0 (a)32.0 (a)49.0 (a)33.6 (a)48.6 (a)Yes (a)No (a)
GW-123R (a)Monitoring well (a)10/25/2000 (a)5/5/2010 7,422,741.22 (a)1,194,707.23 (a)4,282.68 (a)4,285.07 (p)42.5 (a)25.0 (a)42.5 (a)26.5 (a)41.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (a)GW-124 (a)Monitoring well (a)6/13/2000 (a)5/5/2010 7,422,756.35 (a)1,194,333.31 (a)4,275.31 (a)4,278.41 (p)39.0 (a)20.5 (a)39.0 (a)24.0 (a)39.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (a)GW-125 (a)Monitoring well (a)10/24/2000 (a)8/3/2011 (n)7,424,925.07 (a)1,192,558.48 (a)4,277.39 (a)4,280.27 (p)38.5 (a)21.0 (a)38.5 (a)23.0 (a)38.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (a)GW-126 (a)Monitoring well (a)12/6/2002 (a)na 7,422,411.59 (a)1,192,626.95 (a)4,275.52 (a)4,279.08 (p)36.0 (a)17.5 (a)36.0 (a)20.5 (a)35.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (a)
GW-127 (a)Monitoring well (a)12/6/2002 (a)na 7,421,541.70 (a)1,192,608.25 (a)4,274.95 (a)4,278.36 (p)36.0 (a)17.5 (a)36.0 (a)20.5 (a)35.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (a)
GW-128 (a)Monitoring well (a)11/29/2005 (a)na 7,422,055.98 (p)1,193,916.21 (p)4,279.33 (a)4,282.62 (p)40.0 (a)22.2 (a)40.0 (a)25.0 (a)40.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (t)
GW-129 (a)Monitoring well (a)8/27/2007 (a)na 7,426,189.84 (p)1,190,375.22 (p)4,280.70 (a)4,283.55 (p)44.0 (a)27.0 (a)44.0 (a)29.0 (a)44.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (u)
GW-130 (a)Monitoring well (a)8/6/2009 (o)na 7,422,901.29 (p)1,194,288.62 (p)4,278.06 (o)4,281.15 (p)39.6 (a)20.4 (a)39.6 (a)24.1 (a)39.1 (a)Yes (a)Yes (o)
GW-131 (a)Monitoring well (a)8/18/2009 (o)na 7,422,907.56 (p)1,194,613.84 (p)4,278.56 (o)4,281.74 (p)39.9 (a)20.5 (a)39.9 (a)24.4 (a)39.4 (a)Yes (a)Yes (o)
GW-132 (a)Monitoring well (a)8/18/2009 (o)na 7,422,912.32 (p)1,194,936.95 (p)4,279.59 (o)4,282.95 (p)40.0 (a)21.9 (a)40.0 (a)24.5 (a)39.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (o)
GW-133 (a)Monitoring well (a)8/12/2009 (o)na 7,422,569.78 (p)1,194,942.96 (p)4,280.87 (o)4,283.54 (p)40.0 (a)21.6 (a)40.0 (a)24.5 (a)39.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (o)
GW-134 (a)Monitoring well (a)8/12/2009 (o)na 7,422,238.19 (p)1,194,938.81 (p)4,282.62 (o)4,285.28 (p)42.2 (a)23.9 (a)42.2 (a)26.7 (a)41.7 (a)Yes (a)Yes (o)
GW-135 (a)Monitoring well (a)8/11/2009 (o)na 7,421,904.87 (p)1,194,936.08 (p)4,281.32 (o)4,284.26 (p)42.0 (a)24.4 (a)42.0 (a)26.5 (a)41.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (o)
GW-136 (a)Monitoring well (a)8/11/2009 (o)na 7,421,583.20 (p)1,194,929.98 (p)4,280.89 (o)4,283.79 (p)42.0 (a)21.8 (a)42.0 (a)26.5 (a)41.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (o)
GW-137 (a)Monitoring well (a)7/29/2009 (o)na 7,425,698.91 (p)1,191,789.80 (p)4,274.95 (o)4,278.43 (p)36.0 (a)18.2 (a)36.0 (a)20.5 (a)35.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (o)
GW-138 (a)Monitoring well (a)7/28/2009 (o)na 7,425,695.21 (p)1,192,096.34 (p)4,276.72 (o)4,279.42 (p)40.0 (a)22.1 (a)40.0 (a)24.0 (a)39.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (o)
GW-139 (a)Monitoring well (a)7/29/2009 (o)na 7,425,689.53 (p)1,192,429.66 (p)4,280.08 (o)4,282.92 (p)39.2 (a)21.0 (a)39.2 (a)23.7 (a)38.7 (a)Yes (a)Yes (o)
GW-139D (a)Monitoring well (a)8/5/2009 (o)na 7,425,700.36 (p)1,192,431.71 (p)4,280.00 (o)4,283.14 (p)96.0 (a)75.9 (a)96.0 (a)80.5 (a)95.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (o)
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL, BOREHOLE AND LYSIMETER INFORMATIONENERGYSOLUTIONS, LLC.
T1-3
Location Type Date Installed DateAbandoned (ft)(ft)Elevation Point Elev.of boring(ft bgs)
Well/boring
log?
Hydraulic
test?of filter pack(ft bgs)of filter pack(ft bgs)screened interval(ft bgs)screened interval(ft bgs)
GW-140 (a)Monitoring well (a)8/10/2009 (o)na 7,425,362.15 (p)1,192,424.28 (p)4,278.00 (o)4,280.88 (p)39.9 (a)21.6 (a)39.9 (a)24.4 (a)39.4 (a)Yes (a)Yes (o)
GW-141 (a)Monitoring well (a)7/31/2009 (o)na 7,425,032.89 (p)1,192,420.84 (p)4,277.09 (o)4,280.19 (p)36.0 (a)18.0 (a)36.0 (a)20.5 (a)35.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (o)
I-1-30 (a)Monitoring well (a)5/10/1990 (a)na 7,420,900.04 (e)1,194,197.40 (e)4,277.29 (c)4,279.45 (p)35.0 (a)24.0 (a)35.0 (a)25.0 (a)35.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (dj)
I-1-50 (a)Monitoring well (a)5/14/1990 (a)na 7,420,899.70 (e)1,194,192.53 (e)4,277.17 (c)4,279.15 (c)49.5 (a)37.0 (a)49.5 (a)39.0 (a)49.0 (a)Yes (a)No
I-1-100 (a)Monitoring well (a)5/2/1990 (a)na 7,420,895.72 (e)1,194,195.49 (e)4,277.29 (c)4,279.33 (p)101.5 (a)85.0 (a)101.5 (a)90.0 (a)100.0 (a)Yes (a)No
I-2-30 (a)Monitoring well (a)6/11/1990 (a)11/29/2005 7,422,147.63 (e)1,193,914.74 (e)4,277.78 (c)4,279.92 (c)37.4 (d)24.0 (a)37.4 (a)25.0 (a)37.4 (a)Yes (a)Yes (dj)
I-2-50 (a)Monitoring well (a)5/23/1990 (a)11/29/2005 7,422,152.50 (e)1,193,917.16 (e)4,277.75 (c)4,279.86 (c)51.0 (a)40.0 (a)51.0 (a)41.0 (a)51.0 (a)Yes (a)No
I-3-30 (a)Monitoring well (a)5/9/1990 (a)na 7,422,922.23 (e)1,194,590.95 (e)4,278.50 (c)4,281.33 (p)35.0 (a)23.0 (a)35.0 (a)24.5 (a)34.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (dj)
I-3-50 (a)Monitoring well (a)5/9/1990 (a)na 7,422,924.48 (e)1,194,595.24 (e)4,278.63 (c)4,281.41 (c)55.0 (a)44.0 (a)55.0 (a)45.0 (a)55.0 (a)Yes (a)No
I-3-100 (a)Monitoring well (a)5/2/1990 (a)na 7,422,927.39 (e)1,194,591.08 (e)4,278.78 (c)4,281.56 (p)101.5 (a)84.0 (a)101.5 (a)90.0 (a)100.0 (a)Yes (a)No
I-4-30 (a)Monitoring well (a)5/15/1990 (a)June-July 1994 (d)7,421,588.82 (d)1,194,927.79 (d)4,277.60 (d)4,280.67 (d)35.0 (a)24.0 (a)35.0 (a)25.0 (a)35.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (d)
I-4-50 (a)Monitoring well (a)5/16/1990 (a)8/26/1994 (d)7,421,589.42 (d)1,194,922.89 (d)4,277.70 (d)4,280.72 (d)52.5 (a)41.0 (a)52.5 (a)42.0 (a)52.0 (a)Yes (a)No
PZ-1 (a)Monitoring well (a)8/4/1999 (a)na 7,420,892.16 (a)1,189,766.48 (e)4,269.70 (a)4,269.18 (p)30.0 (a)16.5 (a)30.0 (a)19.0 (a)29.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (i)
PZ-2 (a)Monitoring well (a)8/4/1999 (a)na 7,427,008.84 (a)1,193,814.09 (e)4,282.00 (a)4,281.79 (p)37.0 (a)23.0 (a)37.0 (a)26.5 (a)36.5 (a)Yes (a)No
P3-95 NEC (a)Monitoring well (a)12/10/1998 (a)9/12/2006 7,423,972.28 (a)1,194,355.90 (a)4,280.51 (c)4,282.86 (c)39.2 (a)20.6 (a)39.2 (a)24.2 (a)39.2 (a)Yes (a)No
P3-95 NECR (a)Monitoring well (a)9/13/2006 (a)na 7,423,973.80 (p)1,194,361.00 (p)4,281.60 (a)4,285.20 (p)40.0 (a)22.1 (a)40.0 (a)25.0 (a)40.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (s)
P3-95 SWC (a)Monitoring well (a)12/9/1998 (a)na 7,423,717.00 (a)1,194,115.29 (a)4,277.48 (c)4,280.25 (p)36.0 (a)19.0 (a)36.0 (a)21.0 (a)36.0 (a)Yes (a)No
P3-97 NEC (a)Monitoring well (a)12/11/1998 (a)na 7,424,292.27 (a)1,194,361.88 (a)4,279.54 (c)4,281.91 (c)34.0 (a)15.5 (a)34.0 (a)19.0 (a)34.0 (a)Yes (a)No
P3-97 NECR (a)Monitoring well (a)9/2/2005 (a)na 7,424,298.41 (p)1,194,343.24 (p)4,278.46 (a)4,282.02 (p)40.0 (a)23.0 (a)40.0 (a)25.0 (a)40.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (r)
EW-901 (a)Extraction well (a)8/17/2009 (o)8/1/2011 (n)7,420,952.10 (o)1,189,815.55 (o)4,268.55 (o)4,271.76 (o)32.0 (a)14.4 (a)32.0 (a)16.5 (a)31.5 (a)Yes (a)Yes (o)EW-902 (a)Extraction well (a)4/6/2010 (q)na 7,420,919.94 (q)1,189,817.05 (q)4,268.80 (q)4,272.16 (q)35.0 (a)17.1 (a)35.0 (a)19.5 (a)34.5 (a)Yes (a)NoSC-1 (a)Piezometer (a)8/23/1981 (a)Nov. 1-2, 1999 (k)7,423,589.35 (d)1,192,466.80 (d)4,275.40 (d)4,278.88 (d)250.3 (a)100.0 (d)229.8 (d)Not available (a)Not available (a)Yes (a)naSC-2 (a)Piezometer (a)8/28/1981 (a)Nov. 1-2, 1999 (k)7,421,215.14 (d)1,190,101.90 (d)4,268.70 (d)4,272.08 (d)50.0 (a)16.0 (d)48.5 (d)Not available (a)Not available (a)Yes (a)na
SC-3 (a)Piezometer (a)8/28/1981 (a)June-July 1994 (d)7,421,108.71 (d)1,194,816.18 (d)4,277.10 (d)4,280.35 (d)50.5 (a)23.0 (d)50.5 (d)Not available (a)Not available (a)Yes (a)na
SC-4 (a)Piezometer (a)8/29/1981 (a)Oct. 2000 7,425,874.65 (d)1,195,002.60 (d)4,280.50 (d)4,284.53 (d)51.5 (a)29.5 (d)51.5 (d)Not available (a)Not available (a)Yes (a)na
SC-5 (a)Piezometer (a)8/31/1981 (a)Oct. 2000 7,425,936.55 (d)1,190,065.90 (d)4,273.50 (d)4,276.10 (d)51.5 (a)29.0 (d)51.5 (d)31.0 (a)51.0 (a)Yes (a)na
SC-6 (a)Piezometer (a)2/16/1982 (a)Nov. 1-2, 1999 (k)7,424,582.27 (d)1,190,043.91 (d)4,272.50 (d)4,276.96 (d)46.0 (a)30.0 (d)46.0 (d)30.0 (a)45.0 (a)Yes (a)na
SC-7 (a)Piezometer (a)2/17/1982 (a)na Not available Not available 4,270.12 (a)Not available 56.0 (a)32.0 (a)56.0 (a)41.0 (a)56.0 (a)Yes (a)na
SC-7A (d)Not available 1981-1982 (d)na Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available No No
SC-7B (d)Not available 1981-1982 (d)na Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available No No
SC-8 (a)Piezometer (a)2/18/1982 (a)na Not available Not available 4,277.80 (a)Not available 52.5 (a)Not available Not available Not available (a)Not available (a)Yes (a)No
SC-8A (d)Not available 1981-1982 (d)na Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available No No
SC-8B (d)Not available 1981-1982 (d)na Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available No No
SC-9 (a)Piezometer (a)2/19/1982 (a)na 7,424,655.15 (d)1,193,339.40 (d)4,278.80 (d)4,283.20 (d)45.5 (a)28.5 (d)45.0 (d)Not available (a)Not available (a)Yes (a)na
SC-10 (a)Piezometer (a)2/22/1982 (a)Nov. 1-2, 1999 (k)7,425,869.96 (d)1,193,354.51 (d)4,279.80 (d)4,284.41 (d)48.0 (a)32.5 (d)48.0 (d)Not available (a)Not available (a)Yes (a)na
SC-11 (a)Piezometer (a)2/23/1982 (a)10/23/2000 7,425,941.57 (d)1,191,622.11 (d)4,275.80 (d)4,280.81 (d)45.0 (a)29.0 (d)45.0 (d)30.0 (a)45.0 (a)Yes (a)na
SC-12 (a)Piezometer (a)2/24/1982 (a)Nov. 1-2, 1999 (k)7,424,575.86 (d)1,191,682.61 (d)4,274.90 (d)4,277.50 (d)58.0 (a)47.5 (d)58.0 (d)Not available (a)Not available (a)Yes (a)na
SC-13 (a)Piezometer (a)2/25/1982 (a)Nov. 1-2, 1999 (k)7,423,112.25 (d)1,191,749.00 (d)4,274.10 (d)4,277.08 (d)56.0 (a)45.5 (d)55.0 (d)Not available (a)Not available (a)Yes (a)na
SLC-201 (a)Monitoring well (a)2/3/1984 (a)Nov. 1-2, 1999 (k)7,424,757.76 (d)1,190,852.51 (d)4,274.00 (d)4,275.69 (d)50.0 (a)36.5 (d)50.0 (d)Not available (a)Not available (a)Yes (a)No
SLC-202 (a)Monitoring well (a)2/3/1984 (a)Nov. 1-2, 1999 (k)7,424,695.76 (d)1,191,327.81 (d)4,274.40 (d)4,275.81 (d)50.0 (a)36.5 (d)50.0 (d)Not available (a)Not available (a)Yes (a)No
SLC-203 (a)Monitoring well (a)2/2/1984 (a)Nov. 1-2, 1999 (k)7,424,577.15 (d)1,192,217.11 (d)4,276.00 (d)4,277.42 (d)50.0 (a)37.5 (d)50.0 (d)Not available (a)Not available (a)Yes (a)No
SLC-204 (a)Monitoring well (a)2/1/1984 (a)Nov. 1-2, 1999 (k)7,423,228.35 (d)1,190,649.71 (d)4,271.80 (d)4,273.21 (d)50.0 (a)34.5 (d)50.0 (d)Not available (a)Not available (a)Yes (a)No
SLC-205 (a)Monitoring well (a)2/2/1984 (a)Nov. 1-2, 1999 (k)7,423,223.85 (d)1,191,253.40 (d)4,273.80 (d)4,275.45 (d)50.0 (a)35.0 (d)50.0 (d)Not available (a)Not available (a)Yes (a)No
SLC-206 (a)Monitoring well (a)2/3/1984 (a)Nov. 1-2, 1999 (k)7,423,318.34 (d)1,192,191.10 (d)4,274.80 (d)4,275.94 (d)50.0 (a)37.5 (d)50.0 (d)Not available (a)Not available (a)Yes (a)No
DH-16A (a)Exploratory hole (a)1/15/1992 (a)Jan. 1992 (a)7,422,998.83 (d)1,193,943.79 (d)4,277.60 (d)na 41.0 (a)NA (a)NA (a)na (a)na (a)Yes (a)naDH-30 (a)Exploratory hole (a)11/27/1991 (a)Nov. 1991 (a)7,421,066.02 (d)1,193,775.29 (d)4,276.30 (d)na 34.5 (a)NA (a)NA (a)na (a)na (a)Yes (a)naDH-31 (a)Piezometer (a)12/9/1991 (a)na 7,422,918.13 (d)1,194,604.39 (d)4,278.30 (d)4,280.95 (d)32.0 (a)24.8 (d)32.0 (a)27.0 (a)32.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (dj)DH-32 (a)Piezometer (a)12/10/1991 (a)na 7,421,612.62 (d)1,193,905.39 (d)4,276.70 (d)4,278.46 (d)32.0 (a)25.0 (a)32.0 (a)27.0 (a)32.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (dj)
DH-33 (a)Piezometer (a)12/10/1991 (a)Sep. 1997 7,422,181.72 (d)1,194,826.69 (d)4,277.90 (d)4,280.23 (d)32.0 (a)26.0 (a)32.0 (a)27.0 (a)32.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (dj)
DH-34 (a)Piezometer (a)12/11/1991 (a)June-July 1994 (d)7,421,108.81 (d)1,194,832.88 (d)4,277.30 (d)4,279.88 (d)32.0 (a)25.6 (d)32.0 (a)27.0 (a)32.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (d)
DH-47 (a)Exploratory hole (a)1/12/1992 (a)Jan. 1992 (a)7,423,694.66 (d)1,190,158.31 (d)4,271.00 (d)na 46.0 (a)na na na (a)na (a)Yes (a)na
DH-48 (a)Exploratory hole (a)2/10/1992 (a)Feb. 1992 (a)7,421,272.12 (d)1,194,057.49 (d)4,277.00 (d)na 29.0 (a)na na na (a)na (a)Yes (a)na
DH-49 (a)Exploratory hole (a)2/10/1992 (a)Feb. 1992 (a)7,421,262.01 (d)1,194,843.48 (d)4,276.90 (d)na 28.0 (a)na na na (a)na (a)Yes (a)na
DH-50 (a)Exploratory hole (a)2/10/1992 (a)Feb. 1992 (a)7,421,649.62 (d)1,194,065.29 (d)4,277.00 (d)na 30.0 (a)na na na (a)na (a)Yes (a)na
DH-51 (a)Exploratory hole (a)2/11/1992 (a)Feb. 1992 (a)7,421,648.62 (d)1,194,880.09 (d)4,277.80 (d)na 28.0 (a)na na na (a)na (a)Yes (a)na
DH-52 (a)Exploratory hole (a)2/11/1992 (a)Feb. 1992 (a)7,420,904.62 (d)1,193,894.29 (d)4,276.30 (d)na 28.0 (a)na na na (a)na (a)Yes (a)na
DH-53 (a)Exploratory hole (a)2/19/1992 (a)Feb. 1992 (a)7,421,263.92 (d)1,194,517.19 (d)4,277.00 (d)na 28.0 (a)na na na (a)na (a)Yes (a)na
DH-54 (a)Exploratory hole (a)2/19/1992 (a)Feb. 1992 (a)7,420,875.31 (d)1,194,900.98 (d)4,277.10 (d)na 28.0 (a)na na na (a)na (a)Yes (a)na
DH-59 (a)Piezometer (a)2/3/1993 (a)na 7,420,970.74 (d)1,190,923.99 (d)4,270.20 (d)4,272.06 (d)25.0 (a)16.5 (a)25.0 (a)20.0 (a)25.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (j)
DH-61 (a)Piezometer (a)2/2/1993 (a)June-July 1994 (d)7,421,628.93 (d)1,191,828.29 (d)4,273.50 (d)4,275.49 (d)27.0 (a)20.0 (a)27.0 (a)22.0 (a)27.0 (a)Yes (a)na
DH-62 (a)Piezometer (a)2/1/1993 (a)June 2000 7,422,371.44 (d)1,191,818.50 (d)4,270.80 (d)4,272.98 (d)26.0 (a)19.0 (a)26.0 (a)21.0 (a)26.0 (a)Yes (a)Yes (j)
DH-65 (a)Exploratory hole (a)9/28/1993 (a)9/28/93 (a)7,421,605.82 (d)1,193,905.29 (d)4,276.70 (d)na (d)43.0 (a)na na na (a)na (a)Yes (a)na
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL, BOREHOLE AND LYSIMETER INFORMATIONENERGYSOLUTIONS, LLC.
T1-4
Location Type Date Installed DateAbandoned (ft)(ft)Elevation Point Elev.of boring(ft bgs)
Well/boring
log?
Hydraulic
test?of filter pack(ft bgs)of filter pack(ft bgs)screened interval(ft bgs)screened interval(ft bgs)
SL-1 (b)Suction lysimeter (b)7/16/1993 (b)na 7,422,676.14 (b)1,192,630.30 (b)4,274.50 (b)na 24.0 (b)na na na (a)na (a)Yes (b)No
SL-2 (b)Suction lysimeter (b)7/19/1993 (b)na 7,422,476.14 (b)1,192,626.30 (b)4,275.10 (b)na 24.0 (b)na na na (a)na (a)Yes (b)No
SL-3 (b)Suction lysimeter (b)7/20/1993 (b)na 7,422,306.14 (b)1,192,622.30 (b)4,275.30 (b)na 24.0 (b)na na na (a)na (a)Yes (b)No
SRS-1 (b)Oil resistivity senso (b)7/16/1993 (b)na 7,422,686.14 (b)1,192,630.30 (b)4,274.70 (b)na 22.5 (b)na na na (a)na (a)Yes (b)No
SRS-2 (b)Oil resistivity senso (b)7/19/1993 (b)na 7,422,486.14 (b)1,192,626.30 (b)4,275.30 (b)na 22.5 (b)na na na (a)na (a)Yes (b)No
SRS-3 (b)Oil resistivity senso (b)7/20/1993 (b)na 7,422,316.14 (b)1,192,622.30 (b)4,275.00 (b)na 22.5 (b)na na na (a)na (a)Yes (b)No
LSW-104S (d)Monitoring well (d)prior 2/96 (d)na Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available 15.0 (a)32.0 (a)20.0 (a)Not available (a)No No
Note:Abbreviations:
All available well logs and completion diagrams are included in Appendix A.
Data Sources:amsl = Above mean sea level
Solutions Boring and completion logs provided by Envirocare or in Revised Hydrogeologic Report, Bingham Environmental, February 1996.bgs = Below ground surface
(b) As-Built Diagrams for Suction Lysimeters and Soil Resistivity Instruments, Bingham Environmental, November 1993.ft = Feet
(c) Pentacore Resources Survey, August, September 1999.
(d) Revised Hydrogeologic Report, Bingham Environmental, February 1996.
(e) Excel file provided by Envirocare (Certified well location tables 1999).
Solutions).
(g) Where no total depth of boring is available, depth at bottom of filter pack is assumed to be total depth of boring.
(h) Depth of boring and bottom of filter pack are assumed to be the bottom of a 10 foot screen.
(i) Final Report for Slug Withdrawal Testing at Envirocare's Clive, Utah Facility, EarthFax, August 1999.
(j) Final Slug Test Results, Adrian Brown Consultants, October 1997.
(k) Abandonment of monitoring wells in the vicinity of the Proposed LARW 200-foot expansion and the Proposed LARW Embankment, Envirocare, 11/12/99.
(m) estimated date of construction
(n) Report of Abandonment/As-Plugged Report for Wells Abandoned in August 2011 (CD11-0235), August 25, 2011.
(o) As-Built Report - 2009 Groundwater Monitoring Wells (CD09-0290), October 28, 2009.
(p) 2010 Annual 11e.(2), Class A, LARW, and Mixed Waste Groundwater Monitoring Report, March 1, 2011.
(q) As-Built Report for Extraction Well EW-902 (CD10-0131), May 5, 2010.
(r) Slug Out Testing Report for Replacement Wells GW-66R and P3-97 NECR (CD05-0524), November 7, 2005.(s) Slug Out Testing Report for Replacement Well P3-95 NECR (CD06-0426), November 7, 2006.(t) Slug Out Testing Report for Replacement Well GW-128 (CD06-0024), January 23, 2006.
TABLE 2
HYDROSTRATIGRAPHIC UNIT CONTACT ELEVATION AND UNIT THICKNESS
ENERGYSOLUTIONS , LLC.
T2-1
Well Top of Unit 41 Unit 4 thickness
(ft)
Top of Unit 3
(ft amsl)
Unit 3 thickness
(ft)
Top of Unit 2
(ft amsl)
Unit 2 thickness
(ft)
Top of Unit 1
(ft amsl)
I-1-30
I-1-50
I-1-100 4,277.29 10.14 4,267.15 15.50 4,251.65 17.00 4,234.65
I-2-30 See I-2-50
I-2-50 4,277.75 9.17 4,268.58 12.80 4,255.78 19.70 4,236.08
I-3-30 See I-3-100
I-3-50 See I-3-100
I-3-100 4,278.78 8.79 4,269.99 13.30 4,256.69 20.20 4,236.49
I-4-30 See I-4-50
I-4-50 4,277.70 9.69 4,268.01 10.00 4,258.01 13.00 4,245.01
SC-1 4,275.40 7.00 4,268.40 23.00 4,245.40 15.00 4,230.40
SC-2 See GW-19B
SC-3 See DH-54
SC-4 See GW-21
SC-5 4,273.50 9.00 4,264.50 23.00 4,241.50 20.00 4,221.50
SC-6 4,272.50 8.00 4,264.50 25.00 4,239.50
SC-7 4,270.12 10.00 4,260.12 19.00 4,241.12
SC-7A See SC-7
SC-7B See SC-7
SC-8 4,277.80 9.02 4,268.78 15.00 4,253.78 22.00 4,231.78
SC-8A See SC-8
SC-8B See SC-8
SC-9 4,278.80 9.00 4,269.80 18.00 4,251.80
SC-10 See GW-8
SC-11 4,275.80 9.00 4,266.80 15.00 4,251.80
SC-12 4,274.90 7.00 4,267.90 20.00 4,247.90 20.00 4,227.90
SC-13 See GW-25
DH-16A See GW-16
DH-30 See GW-105
DH-31 See I-3-100
DH-32 See GW-64
DH-33 See GW-70
DH-34 See SC-3
DH-47 4,271.00 9.50 4,261.50 18.00 4,243.50 13.50 4,230.00
TABLE 2
HYDROSTRATIGRAPHIC UNIT CONTACT ELEVATION AND UNIT THICKNESS
ENERGYSOLUTIONS , LLC.
T2-2
Well Top of Unit 41 Unit 4 thickness
(ft)
Top of Unit 3
(ft amsl)
Unit 3 thickness
(ft)
Top of Unit 2
(ft amsl)
Unit 2 thickness
(ft)
Top of Unit 1
(ft amsl)
DH-48 4,277.00 10.50 4,266.50 11.20 4,255.30
DH-49 See GW-41
DH-50 4,277.00 10.50 4,266.50 10.70 4,255.80
DH-51 See GW-67
DH-52 4,276.30 11.00 4,265.30 14.00 4,251.30
DH-53 4,277.00 9.50 4,267.50 11.50 4,256.00
DH-54 4,277.10 9.50 4,267.60 12.60 4,255.00
DH-59 See GW-63
DH-61 4,273.50 10.50 4,263.00 16.00 4,247.00
DH-62 See GW-38
DH-65 See GW-64
GW-1 See GW-60
GW-2 4,277.90 9.50 4,268.40 13.50 4,254.90
GW-3 See DH-47
GW-4 See GW-23
GW-5 4,276.60 8.00 4,268.60 20.00 4,248.60
GW-6 4,279.80 10.00 4,269.80 18.80 4,251.00 9.00 4,242.00
GW-7 Not found
GW-8 4,280.00 10.00 4,270.00 18.00 4,252.00
GW-9 4,278.80 10.00 4,268.80 16.50 4,252.30
GW-10 Not found
GW-11 See GW-64
GW-12 See DH-50
GW-13 See GW-45
GW-16 4,277.56 9.56 4,268.00 13.00 4,255.00
GW-16R See GW-16
GW-17A 4,276.53 10.03 4,266.50 15.00 4,251.50
GW-18 See GW-103
GW-19A See GW-19B
GW-19B 4,269.14 13.41 4,255.73 15.00 4,240.73 13.50 4,227.23
GW-20 4,275.29 9.54 4,265.75 15.00 4,250.75
GW-21 4,280.50 13.50 4,267.00 7.00 4,260.00 21.50 4,238.50
GW-22 4,276.39 8.98 4,267.41 12.00 4,255.41
GW-23 4,275.31 8.23 4,267.08 13.50 4,253.58
TABLE 2
HYDROSTRATIGRAPHIC UNIT CONTACT ELEVATION AND UNIT THICKNESS
ENERGYSOLUTIONS , LLC.
T2-3
Well Top of Unit 41 Unit 4 thickness
(ft)
Top of Unit 3
(ft amsl)
Unit 3 thickness
(ft)
Top of Unit 2
(ft amsl)
Unit 2 thickness
(ft)
Top of Unit 1
(ft amsl)
GW-24 4,275.50 8.91 4,266.59 14.00 4,252.59
GW-25 4,274.52 8.49 4,266.03 17.00 4,249.03
GW-26 4,272.91 10.21 4,262.70 16.50 4,246.20
GW-27 See GW-27D
GW-27D 4,270.88 11.50 4,259.38 16.50 4,242.88 17.00 4,225.88
GW-28 4,269.91 12.86 4,257.05 12.50 4,244.55
GW-29 See GW-103
GW-36 4,270.25 12.34 4,257.91 12.00 4,245.91
GW-37 4,269.30 7.25 4,262.05 14.50 4,247.55
GW-38 4,271.34 6.75 4,264.59 16.00 4,248.59
GW-41 4,277.58 9.54 4,268.04 11.00 4,257.04 11.00 4,246.04
GW-42 4,278.16 9.24 4,268.92 11.00 4,257.92
GW-43 4,278.20 11.24 4,266.96 10.00 4,256.96 15.00 4,241.96
GW-44 4,277.30 10.32 4,266.98 11.50 4,255.48 13.50 4,241.98
GW-45 4,277.74 10.59 4,267.15 12.00 4,255.15 10.00 4,245.15
GW-46 4,277.65 10.16 4,267.49 12.00 4,255.49 12.00 4,243.49
GW-55 4,278.20 10.35 4,267.85 11.50 4,256.35
GW-56 4,275.90 8.50 4,267.40 11.00 4,256.40 12.50 4,243.90
GW-56R 4,277.63 9.54 4,268.09 12.00 4,256.09
GW-57 4,269.97 11.80 4,258.17 16.50 4,241.67
GW-58 4,269.65 11.90 4,257.75 14.00 4,243.75
GW-60 4,273.03 10.00 4,263.03 12.70 4,250.33
GW-63 4,270.22 10.40 4,259.82 14.00 4,245.82
GW-64 4,277.26 9.70 4,267.56 12.50 4,255.06 9.50 4,245.56
GW-66 4,277.51 9.70 4,267.81 12.00 4,255.81 10.00 4,245.81
GW-66R See GW-66
GW-67 4,278.15 9.00 4,269.15 11.00 4,258.15 15.50 4,242.65
GW-67R See GW-67
GW-68 4,279.27 9.01 4,270.26 11.00 4,259.26 16.00 4,243.26
GW-68R See GW-68
GW-69 4,277.99 9.03 4,268.96 13.00 4,255.96 11.00 4,244.96
GW-69R See GW-69
GW-70 4,278.76 8.72 4,270.04 14.00 4,256.04 12.00 4,244.04
GW-71 4,278.44 9.85 4,268.59 12.00 4,256.59 13.50 4,243.09
TABLE 2
HYDROSTRATIGRAPHIC UNIT CONTACT ELEVATION AND UNIT THICKNESS
ENERGYSOLUTIONS , LLC.
T2-4
Well Top of Unit 41 Unit 4 thickness
(ft)
Top of Unit 3
(ft amsl)
Unit 3 thickness
(ft)
Top of Unit 2
(ft amsl)
Unit 2 thickness
(ft)
Top of Unit 1
(ft amsl)
GW-75 See GW-105
GW-76 See GW-104
GW-77 See GW-105
GW-78 See GW-104
GW-79 4,277.10 9.00 4,268.10 12.50 4,255.60
GW-80
GW-81 4,274.18 9.00 4,265.18 21.00 4,244.18
GW-82 4,274.35 8.00 4,266.35 22.50 4,243.85
GW-83 4,274.51 7.00 4,267.51 22.00 4,245.51
GW-84 4,274.78 7.50 4,267.28 19.50 4,247.78
GW-85 4,275.16 7.50 4,267.66 19.50 4,248.16
GW-86 4,275.83 8.50 4,267.33 19.00 4,248.33
GW-88 4,276.86 9.00 4,267.86 16.00 4,251.86
GW-89 4,276.85 8.50 4,268.35 17.50 4,250.85
GW-90 4,276.04 9.00 4,267.04 15.00 4,252.04
GW-91 4,276.10 9.00 4,267.10 18.10 4,249.00
GW-92 4,276.35 9.50 4,266.85 15.50 4,251.35
GW-93 4,275.02 8.00 4,267.02 24.00 4,243.02
GW-94 4,273.94 8.94 4,265.00 18.00 4,247.00
GW-95 4,271.57 11.50 4,260.07 16.00 4,244.07
GW-96 Not found
GW-97 Not found
GW-98 Not found
GW-99 4,270.89 12.00 4,258.89 14.00 4,244.89
GW-100 4,271.27 12.27 4,259.00 16.00 4,243.00
GW-101 4,272.32 11.50 4,260.82 17.50 4,243.32
GW-102 See SC-6
GW-103 4,275.29 13.00 4,262.29 10.29 4,252.00
GW-104 4,275.42 13.00 4,262.42 11.42 4,251.00
GW-105 4,276.23 13.00 4,263.23 15.50 4,247.73
GW-106 4,273.43 9.00 4,264.43 21.50 4,242.93
GW-107 4,273.47 9.00 4,264.47 22.50 4,241.97
GW-108 4,273.29 9.00 4,264.29 24.00 4,240.29
TABLE 2
HYDROSTRATIGRAPHIC UNIT CONTACT ELEVATION AND UNIT THICKNESS
ENERGYSOLUTIONS , LLC.
T2-5
Well Top of Unit 41 Unit 4 thickness
(ft)
Top of Unit 3
(ft amsl)
Unit 3 thickness
(ft)
Top of Unit 2
(ft amsl)
Unit 2 thickness
(ft)
Top of Unit 1
(ft amsl)
GW-109 4,273.90 9.00 4,264.90 19.00 4,245.90
GW-110 4,274.10 10.50 4,263.60 18.50 4,245.10
GW-111 4,274.40 9.50 4,264.90 19.50 4,245.40
GW-112 4,274.76 11.00 4,263.76 17.00 4,246.76
GW-113 4,276.05 10.50 4,265.55 15.50 4,250.05
GW-114 4,276.68 11.50 4,265.18 14.00 4,251.18
GW-115 4,277.03 11.50 4,265.53 12.50 4,253.03
GW-116 4,278.06 11.00 4,267.06 15.00 4,252.06
GW-117 4,277.12 11.00 4,266.12 15.50 4,250.62
GW-118 See GW-2
GW-119 See GW-2
GW-120 See GW-2
GW-121 See GW-2
GW-122 See I-3-100
GW-123 See I-3-100
GW-123R See I-3-100
GW-124 See I-3-100
GW-125 See GW-88
GW-126 See GW-24
GW-127 4,274.95 7.50 4,267.45 13.80 4,253.65
GW-128 4,279.33 12.50 4,266.83 15.50 4,251.33
GW-129 4275.20
GW-130 4,278.06 10.00 4,268.06 12.00 4,256.06
GW-131 4,278.56 10.00 4,268.56 11.50 4,257.06
GW-132 4,279.59 12.00 4,267.59 11.50 4,256.09
GW-133 4278.37
GW-134 4280.62
GW-135 4,281.32 14.00 4,267.32 10.50 4,256.82
GW-136
GW-137 4,274.95 8.00 4,266.95 16.00 4,250.95
GW-138 4,276.72 10.00 4,266.72 15.00 4,251.72
GW-139 4,280.08 10.00 4,270.08 17.00 4,253.08
GW-139D 4,280.00 See GW-139 See GW-139 See GW-139 See GW-139 18.00 4,235.00
TABLE 2
HYDROSTRATIGRAPHIC UNIT CONTACT ELEVATION AND UNIT THICKNESS
ENERGYSOLUTIONS , LLC.
T2-6
Well Top of Unit 41 Unit 4 thickness
(ft)
Top of Unit 3
(ft amsl)
Unit 3 thickness
(ft)
Top of Unit 2
(ft amsl)
Unit 2 thickness
(ft)
Top of Unit 1
(ft amsl)
GW-140 4,278.00 11.00 4,267.00 16.50 4,250.50
GW-141 4,277.09 11.50 4,265.59 14.00 4,251.59
EW-901 See EW-902
EW-902 4,268.80 13.00 4,255.80 13.00 4,242.80
PZ-1 4,269.70 13.50 4,256.20 12.50 4,243.70
PZ-2 4,282.00 12.50 4,269.50 16.00 4,253.50
SL-1 See SRS-1
SL-2 See SRS-2
SL-3 See SRS-3
SRS-1 4,274.70 8.80 4,265.90 13.00 4,252.90
SRS-2 4,275.30 9.30 4,266.00 12.50 4,253.50
SRS-3 4,275.00 9.80 4,265.20 12.50 4,252.70
P3-95 NEC
P3-95 NECR See P3-95 NEC
P3-95 SWC 4,277.48 9.00 4,268.48 11.50 4,256.98
P3-97 NEC 4,279.54 12.00 4,267.54 11.50 4,256.04
P3-97 NECR See P3-97 NEC
Maximum 14.50 4,270.26 25.00 4,260.00 22.00 4,246.04
Minimum 6.75 4,255.73 7.00 4,239.50 9.00 4,221.50
Average 10.00 4,265.75 14.93 4,250.81 14.85 4,238.31
Where several monitoring wells, boreholes, or lysimeters are located within a small area, a single log was selected to represent all logs in the immediate vicinity.
Adjusted downward 5.5 feet to reflect pre-fill ground surface elevation.
Adjusted downward 3.0 feet to reflect pre-fill ground surface elevation.
TABLE 3
SITE-WIDE HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY TEST RESULTS
ENERGYSOLUTIONS , LLC.
T3-1
Well/Test Cell(s)
Hydraulic
Conductivity
(ft/day)
Hydraulic
Conductivity
(cm/sec)
Well Hydraulic
Conductivity
(cm/sec)
Log Hydraulic
Conductivity
(log[cm/sec])
Well Hydraulic
Conductivity
(log[cm/sec])
GW-16R-A1 LARW 1.75 6.19E-04 -3.208
GW-16R-B1 LARW 1.98 6.98E-04 -3.156
GW-16R-B2 LARW 1.03 3.63E-04 5.60E-04 -3.440 -3.268
GW-17AA1 VITRO 2.07 7.32E-04 -3.136
GW-17AB1 VITRO 2.50 8.81E-04 -3.055
GW-17AB2 VITRO 2.39 8.44E-04 8.19E-04 -3.074 -3.088
GW-19AA1 11.e(2)0.22 7.80E-05 -4.108
GW-19AB1 11.e(2)0.18 6.28E-05 -4.202
GW-19AB2 11.e(2)0.25 8.93E-05 7.67E-05 -4.049 -4.120
GW-20-A1 11.e(2)/LARW 5.01 1.77E-03 -2.753
GW-20-A2 11.e(2)/LARW 5.50 1.94E-03 -2.713
GW-20-A3 11.e(2)/LARW 6.66 2.35E-03 2.02E-03 -2.629 -2.698
GW-21A1 VITRO 5.15 1.82E-03 -2.741
GW-21A2 VITRO 4.25 1.50E-03 -2.824
GW-21A3 VITRO 5.37 1.89E-03 1.74E-03 -2.723 -2.763
GW-22-A1 LARW 2.45 8.63E-04 -3.064
GW-22-A2 LARW 2.20 7.77E-04 -3.109
GW-22-A3 LARW 2.11 7.44E-04 7.95E-04 -3.129 -3.101
GW-23-A3 LARW 1.47 5.18E-04 -3.286
GW-23-B1 LARW 1.69 5.97E-04 5.58E-04 -3.224 -3.255
GW-24-A1 11.e(2)/LARW 0.60 2.13E-04 -3.671
GW-24-B1 11.e(2)/LARW 0.78 2.73E-04 -3.563
GW-24-B2 11.e(2)/LARW 0.72 2.54E-04 2.47E-04 -3.596 -3.610
GW-25-B1 11.e(2)/LARW 2.32 8.17E-04 -3.088
GW-25-B2 11.e(2)/LARW 3.33 1.17E-03 -2.931
GW-25-B3 11.e(2)/LARW 3.57 1.26E-03 -2.900
GW-25-B4 11.e(2)/LARW 2.56 9.02E-04 -3.045
GW-25-B5 11.e(2)/LARW 3.15 1.11E-03 1.05E-03 -2.954 -2.983
GW-26-A1 11.e(2)0.95 3.35E-04 -3.475
GW-26-A2 11.e(2)0.92 3.26E-04 3.31E-04 -3.487 -3.481
GW-27A1 11.e(2)0.13 4.42E-05 -4.355
GW-27B1 11.e(2)0.07 2.60E-05 -4.585
GW-27B2 11.e(2)0.10 3.44E-05 3.49E-05 -4.463 -4.467
GW-28A1 11.e(2)0.68 2.41E-04 -3.617
GW-28B1 11.e(2)0.57 2.01E-04 -3.697
GW-28B2 11.e(2)0.43 1.52E-04 1.98E-04 -3.818 -3.711
GW-29A1 11.e(2)/LARW 2.44 8.60E-04 -3.066
GW-29A2 11.e(2)/LARW 0.58 2.05E-04 -3.687
GW-29A3 11.e(2)/LARW 1.33 4.69E-04 5.11E-04 -3.328 -3.361
GW-36A1 11.e(2)1.87 6.61E-04 -3.180
GW-36A2 11.e(2)1.73 6.10E-04 -3.215
GW-36A3 11.e(2)1.84 6.49E-04 6.40E-04 -3.188 -3.194
GW-37A1 11.e(2)0.98 3.44E-04 -3.463
GW-37B1 11.e(2)1.02 3.60E-04 -3.444
GW-37B2 11.e(2)1.07 3.78E-04 3.61E-04 -3.423 -3.443
TABLE 3
SITE-WIDE HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY TEST RESULTS
ENERGYSOLUTIONS , LLC.
T3-2
Well/Test Cell(s)
Hydraulic
Conductivity
(ft/day)
Hydraulic
Conductivity
(cm/sec)
Well Hydraulic
Conductivity
(cm/sec)
Log Hydraulic
Conductivity
(log[cm/sec])
Well Hydraulic
Conductivity
(log[cm/sec])
GW-38B1 11.e(2)1.57 5.55E-04 -3.256
GW-38B2 11.e(2)1.57 5.55E-04 5.80E-04 -3.256 -3.237
GW-38R 11e.(2)0.28 1.00E-04 -3.999
GW-38R 11e.(2)0.29 1.04E-04 1.02E-04 -3.983 -3.991
GW-41A1 MW 1.39 4.91E-04 -3.309
GW-41B1 MW 2.05 7.22E-04 -3.141
GW-41B2 MW 1.98 6.98E-04 6.37E-04 -3.156 -3.202
GW-42A1 MW 2.19 7.74E-04 -3.111
GW-42B1 MW 2.71 9.57E-04 -3.019
GW-42B2 MW 2.25 7.92E-04 8.41E-04 -3.101 -3.077
GW-43A1 MW 2.06 7.25E-04 -3.139
GW-43B2 MW 3.23 1.14E-03 -2.943
GW-43B3 MW 2.84 1.00E-03 9.56E-04 -2.999 -3.027
GW-44A1 MW 1.40 4.94E-04 -3.306
GW-44B1 MW 2.36 8.32E-04 -3.080
GW-44B2 MW 2.23 7.86E-04 7.04E-04 -3.104 -3.164
GW-45A1 MW 0.46 1.62E-04 -3.791
GW-45B1 MW 0.68 2.40E-04 -3.619
GW-45B2 MW 0.69 2.42E-04 2.15E-04 -3.616 -3.675
GW-46A1 MW 0.30 1.05E-04 -3.981
GW-46B1 MW 0.30 1.06E-04 -3.976
GW-46B2 MW 0.33 1.16E-04 1.09E-04 -3.934 -3.963
GW-56R-A1 LARW 6.84 2.41E-03 -2.617
GW-56R-A2 LARW 2.64 9.30E-04 -3.032
GW-56R-A3 LARW 4.22 1.49E-03 -2.827
GW-56R-A4 LARW 7.42 2.62E-03 1.86E-03 -2.582 -2.764
GW-57A1 11.e(2)0.46 1.63E-04 -3.788
GW-57B1 11.e(2)0.33 1.18E-04 -3.928
GW-57B2 11.e(2)0.53 1.86E-04 1.56E-04 -3.731 -3.816
GW-58A1 11.e(2)1.59 5.61E-04 -3.251
GW-58B1 11.e(2)1.32 4.66E-04 -3.331
GW-58B2 11.e(2)0.95 3.35E-04 4.54E-04 -3.475 -3.352
GW-60-A1 11.e(2)5.69 2.01E-03 -2.697
GW-60-A3 11.e(2)13.56 4.79E-03 3.40E-03 -2.320 -2.509
GW-63-A1 11.e(2)2.53 8.93E-04 -3.049
GW-63-A2 11.e(2)2.46 8.69E-04 -3.061
GW-63-A3 11.e(2)1.28 4.51E-04 7.38E-04 -3.346 -3.152
GW-64-B1 LARW 2.05 7.22E-04 -3.141
GW-64-B2 LARW 1.87 6.61E-04 -3.180
GW-64-B4 LARW 1.97 6.95E-04 6.93E-04 -3.158 -3.160
GW-66A1 MW 0.22 7.68E-05 -4.115
GW-66B1 MW 0.15 5.21E-05 -4.283
GW-66B2 MW 0.29 1.02E-04 7.71E-05 -3.990 -4.129
GW-66R #1 MW 0.54 1.91E-04 -3.720
GW-66R #2 MW 0.62 2.19E-04 -3.660
GW-66R #3 MW 0.69 2.43E-04 2.18E-04 -3.614 -3.665
TABLE 3
SITE-WIDE HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY TEST RESULTS
ENERGYSOLUTIONS , LLC.
T3-3
Well/Test Cell(s)
Hydraulic
Conductivity
(ft/day)
Hydraulic
Conductivity
(cm/sec)
Well Hydraulic
Conductivity
(cm/sec)
Log Hydraulic
Conductivity
(log[cm/sec])
Well Hydraulic
Conductivity
(log[cm/sec])
GW-67B1 MW 1.19 4.21E-04 -3.376
GW-67B2 MW 1.17 4.11E-04 -3.386
GW-67 #1 MW 1.98 6.99E-04 -3.156
GW-67 #2 MW 1.97 6.95E-04 5.14E-04 -3.158 -3.308
GW-67R#1 MW 5.32 1.88E-03 -2.727
GW-67R#2 MW 5.25 1.85E-03 1.86E-03 -2.732 -2.729
GW-68A1 MW 0.33 1.16E-04 -3.937
GW-68B1 MW 0.27 9.54E-05 -4.020
GW-68B2 MW 0.26 9.17E-05 -4.037
GW-68 #1 MW 0.94 3.32E-04 -3.479
GW-68 #2 MW 0.93 3.28E-04 1.92E-04 -3.484 -3.792
GW-68R#1 MW 8.24 2.91E-03 -2.537
GW-68R#2 MW 8.44 2.98E-03 2.94E-03 -2.526 -2.531
GW-69B1 MW 0.12 4.39E-05 -4.358
GW-69A1 MW 0.13 4.63E-05 -4.334
GW-69 #1 MW 2.82 9.95E-04 -3.002
GW-69 #2 MW 2.12 7.48E-04 4.58E-04 -3.126 -3.705
GW-69R#1 MW 4.25 1.50E-03 -2.824
GW-69R#2 MW 3.32 1.17E-03 1.34E-03 -2.931 -2.878
GW-70A1 MW 0.46 1.63E-04 -3.787
GW-70B1 MW 0.61 2.14E-04 -3.670
GW-70B2 MW 0.48 1.69E-04 -3.772
GW-70 #1 MW 7.98 2.82E-03 -2.550
GW-70 #2 MW 7.79 2.75E-03 1.22E-03 -2.561 -3.268
GW-71A1 MW 4.35 1.54E-03 -2.814
GW-71B1 MW 2.40 8.47E-04 -3.072
GW-71B2 MW 2.20 7.77E-04 -3.109
GW-71 #1 MW 8.89 3.14E-03 -2.504
GW-71 #2 MW 8.86 3.13E-03 1.88E-03 -2.505 -2.801
GW-75A1 LARW 0.03 9.33E-06 -5.030
GW-75A2 LARW 0.07 2.33E-05 1.63E-05 -4.633 -4.832
GW-76A1 LARW 0.05 1.61E-05 -4.794
GW-76A2 LARW 0.28 9.94E-05 5.77E-05 -4.003 -4.398
GW-77 #1 LARW 2.56 9.03E-04 -3.044
GW-77 #2 LARW 2.50 8.82E-04 8.93E-04 -3.055 -3.049
GW-78 #1 LARW 5.08 1.79E-03 -2.747
GW-78 #2 LARW 4.15 1.46E-03 1.63E-03 -2.834 -2.791
GW-79 #1 MW 4.50 1.59E-03 -2.799
GW-79 #2 MW 4.12 1.45E-03 1.52E-03 -2.838 -2.818
GW-80 #1 MW 4.91 1.73E-03 -2.761
GW-80 #2 MW 5.01 1.77E-03 1.75E-03 -2.753 -2.757
GW-81 #1 Class A 1.49 5.26E-04 -3.279
GW-81 #2 Class A 1.47 5.19E-04 5.22E-04 -3.285 -3.282
GW-82 #1 Class A 1.82 6.42E-04 -3.192
GW-82 #2 Class A 1.45 5.12E-04 5.77E-04 -3.291 -3.242
TABLE 3
SITE-WIDE HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY TEST RESULTS
ENERGYSOLUTIONS , LLC.
T3-4
Well/Test Cell(s)
Hydraulic
Conductivity
(ft/day)
Hydraulic
Conductivity
(cm/sec)
Well Hydraulic
Conductivity
(cm/sec)
Log Hydraulic
Conductivity
(log[cm/sec])
Well Hydraulic
Conductivity
(log[cm/sec])
GW-83 #2 Class A 8.76 3.09E-03 3.05E-03 -2.510 -2.516
GW-84 #1 Class A 10.95 3.86E-03 -2.413
GW-84 #2 Class A 10.30 3.63E-03 3.75E-03 -2.440 -2.426
GW-85 #1 Class A 11.14 3.93E-03 -2.406
GW-85 #2 Class A 11.18 3.94E-03 3.94E-03 -2.404 -2.405
GW-86 #1 Class A 4.80 1.69E-03 -2.771
GW-86 #2 Class A 4.57 1.61E-03 1.65E-03 -2.793 -2.782
GW-88 #1 Class A 2.66 9.38E-04 -3.028
GW-88 #2 Class A 2.92 1.03E-03 9.84E-04 -2.987 -3.007
GW-89 #1 Class A 1.67 5.89E-04 -3.230
GW-89 #2 Class A 1.88 6.63E-04 6.26E-04 -3.178 -3.204
GW-90 #1 Class A 8.86 3.13E-03 -2.505
GW-90 #2 Class A 7.78 2.74E-03 2.94E-03 -2.562 -2.533
GW-91 #1 Class A 5.73 2.02E-03 -2.694
GW-91 #2 Class A 5.48 1.93E-03 1.98E-03 -2.714 -2.704
GW-92 #1 Class A 2.45 8.64E-04 -3.063
GW-92 #2 Class A 2.47 8.71E-04 8.68E-04 -3.060 -3.062
GW-93 #1 Class A 17.04 6.01E-03 -2.221
GW-93 #2 Class A 16.72 5.90E-03 5.96E-03 -2.229 -2.225
GW-94 #1 Class A 12.73 4.49E-03 -2.348
GW-94 #2 Class A 13.71 4.84E-03 4.66E-03 -2.315 -2.332
GW-95 #1 Class A 1.04 3.67E-04 -3.435
GW-95 #2 Class A 1.01 3.56E-04 3.62E-04 -3.448 -3.442
GW-99 #1 Class A 0.85 3.00E-04 -3.523
GW-99 #2 Class A 0.82 2.89E-04 2.95E-04 -3.539 -3.531
GW-100 #1 Class A 1.78 6.28E-04 -3.202
GW-100 #2 Class A 1.87 6.60E-04 6.44E-04 -3.181 -3.191
GW-101 #1 Class A 2.36 8.33E-04 -3.080
GW-101 #2 Class A 1.91 6.74E-04 7.53E-04 -3.171 -3.126
GW-102 #1 Class A 2.37 8.36E-04 -3.078
GW-102 #2 Class A 2.46 8.68E-04 8.52E-04 -3.062 -3.070
GW-103 LARW 11.45 4.04E-03 -2.394
GW-103 LARW 11.67 4.12E-03 -2.386
GW-103 LARW 17.83 6.29E-03 -2.201
GW-103 LARW 8.85 3.12E-03 4.39E-03 -2.505 -2.372
GW-104 LARW 7.17 2.53E-03 -2.597
GW-104 LARW 10.39 3.66E-03 -2.436
GW-104 LARW 8.89 3.14E-03 3.11E-03 -2.503 -2.512
GW-105 LARW 15.72 5.55E-03 -2.256
GW-105 LARW 15.18 5.35E-03 -2.271
GW-105 LARW 15.80 5.57E-03 5.49E-03 -2.254 -2.260
GW-106 Class A North 1.75 6.19E-04 -3.208
GW-106 Class A North 1.68 5.94E-04 6.07E-04 -3.226 -3.217
GW-107 Class A North 1.41 4.96E-04 -3.305
GW-107 Class A North 1.54 5.45E-04 5.21E-04 -3.264 -3.284
TABLE 3
SITE-WIDE HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY TEST RESULTS
ENERGYSOLUTIONS , LLC.
T3-5
Well/Test Cell(s)
Hydraulic
Conductivity
(ft/day)
Hydraulic
Conductivity
(cm/sec)
Well Hydraulic
Conductivity
(cm/sec)
Log Hydraulic
Conductivity
(log[cm/sec])
Well Hydraulic
Conductivity
(log[cm/sec])
GW-108 Class A North 1.74 6.13E-04 6.27E-04 -3.213 -3.203
GW-109 Class A North 1.84 6.50E-04 -3.187
GW-109 Class A North 1.71 6.04E-04 6.27E-04 -3.219 -3.203
GW-110 Class A North 2.27 8.00E-04 -3.097
GW-110 Class A North 2.10 7.41E-04 7.71E-04 -3.130 -3.114
GW-111 Class A North 5.39 1.90E-03 -2.721
GW-111 Class A North 4.39 1.55E-03 1.73E-03 -2.810 -2.765
GW-112 Class A North 5.95 2.10E-03 -2.678
GW-112 Class A North 6.49 2.29E-03 2.20E-03 -2.640 -2.659
GW-113 Class A North 3.12 1.10E-03 -2.959
GW-113 Class A North 2.69 9.50E-04 1.03E-03 -3.022 -2.990
GW-114 Class A North 3.03 1.07E-03 -2.971
GW-114 Class A North 3.37 1.19E-03 1.13E-03 -2.924 -2.948
GW-115 Class A North 3.94 1.39E-03 -2.857
GW-115 Class A North 4.11 1.45E-03 1.42E-03 -2.839 -2.848
GW-116 Class A North 6.72 2.37E-03 -2.625
GW-116 Class A North 7.06 2.49E-03 2.43E-03 -2.604 -2.615
GW-117 Class A North 5.75 2.03E-03 -2.693
GW-117 Class A North 6.32 2.23E-03 2.13E-03 -2.652 -2.672
GW-118 MW 6.98 2.46E-03 -2.608
GW-118 MW 6.70 2.36E-03 2.41E-03 -2.627 -2.618
GW-119 MW 0.78 2.73E-04 -3.563
GW-119 MW 3.04 1.07E-03 6.72E-04 -2.970 -3.267
GW-120 MW 5.76 2.03E-03 -2.692
GW-120 MW 6.88 2.43E-03 2.23E-03 -2.615 -2.654
GW-121 MW 0.34 1.21E-04 -3.919
GW-121 MW 0.34 1.18E-04 1.20E-04 -3.927 -3.923
GW-122 MW 2.21 7.79E-04 -3.108
GW-122 MW 2.35 8.28E-04 8.04E-04 -3.082 -3.095
GW-123 MW 5.45 1.92E-03 -2.716
GW-123 MW 1.82 6.43E-04 1.28E-03 -3.192 -2.954
GW-123R MW 1.23 4.34E-04 -3.363
GW-123R MW 1.08 3.80E-04 -3.421
GW-123R MW 1.03 3.65E-04 3.93E-04 -3.438 -3.407
GW-124 MW 0.80 2.84E-04 -3.547
GW-124 MW 0.72 2.55E-04 2.69E-04 -3.594 -3.571
GW-125 Class A North 8.67 3.06E-03 -2.514
GW-125 Class A North 9.61 3.39E-03 -2.470
GW-125 Class A North 8.69 3.07E-03 3.17E-03 -2.514 -2.499
GW-126 11.e(2)/LARW 0.94 3.31E-04 -3.480
GW-126 11.e(2)/LARW 1.00 3.52E-04 3.42E-04 -3.453 -3.467
GW-127 11.e(2)/LARW 1.83 6.46E-04 -3.190
GW-127 11.e(2)/LARW 1.64 5.78E-04 6.12E-04 -3.238 -3.214
GW-128 #2 LARW 4.16 1.47E-03 -2.833
GW-128 #3 LARW 4.16 1.47E-03 -2.833
GW-128 #4 LARW 4.16 1.47E-03 1.47E-03 -2.833 -2.833
TABLE 3
SITE-WIDE HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY TEST RESULTS
ENERGYSOLUTIONS , LLC.
T3-6
Well/Test Cell(s)
Hydraulic
Conductivity
(ft/day)
Hydraulic
Conductivity
(cm/sec)
Well Hydraulic
Conductivity
(cm/sec)
Log Hydraulic
Conductivity
(log[cm/sec])
Well Hydraulic
Conductivity
(log[cm/sec])
GW-129 #2 Pond 1.59 5.61E-04 5.34E-04 -3.251 -3.273
GW-130 #1 MW 0.70 2.47E-04 -3.607
GW-130 #2 MW 0.71 2.50E-04 2.49E-04 -3.601 -3.604
GW-131 #1 MW 0.85 3.00E-04 -3.523
GW-131 #2 MW 0.86 3.03E-04 3.02E-04 -3.518 -3.521
GW-132 #1 MW 1.41 4.97E-04 -3.303
GW-132 #2 MW 1.48 5.22E-04 5.10E-04 -3.282 -3.293
GW-133 #1 MW 0.69 2.43E-04 -3.614
GW-133 #2 MW 0.63 2.22E-04 2.33E-04 -3.653 -3.633
GW-134 #1 MW 6.59 2.32E-03 -2.634
GW-134 #2 MW 6.54 2.31E-03 2.32E-03 -2.637 -2.635
GW-135 #1 MW 0.17 6.00E-05 -4.222
GW-135 #2 MW 0.18 6.35E-05 6.17E-05 -4.197 -4.210
GW-136 #1 MW 0.65 2.29E-04 -3.640
GW-136 #2 MW 0.64 2.26E-04 2.28E-04 -3.646 -3.643
GW-137 #1 Class A North 6.20 2.19E-03 -2.660
GW-137 #2 Class A North 6.86 2.42E-03 2.30E-03 -2.616 -2.638
GW-138 #1 Class A North 6.49 2.29E-03 -2.640
GW-138 #2 Class A North 6.26 2.21E-03 2.25E-03 -2.656 -2.648
GW-139 #1 Class A North 3.97 1.40E-03 -2.854
GW-139 #2 Class A North 4.00 1.41E-03 1.41E-03 -2.850 -2.852
GW-139D #1 Deep 3.66 1.29E-03 -2.889
GW-139D #2 Deep 3.88 1.37E-03 1.33E-03 -2.864 -2.876
GW-140 #1 Class A North 2.29 8.08E-04 -3.093
GW-140 #2 Class A North 2.29 8.08E-04 8.08E-04 -3.093 -3.093
GW-141 #1 Class A North 1.81 6.39E-04 -3.195
GW-141 #2 Class A North 1.84 6.49E-04 6.44E-04 -3.188 -3.191
I-1-30A1 MW 2.20 7.77E-04 -3.109
I-1-30A2 MW 2.40 8.47E-04 -3.072
I-1-30A3 MW 2.36 8.32E-04 8.19E-04 -3.080 -3.087
I-2-30A2 LARW 0.49 1.74E-04 1.74E-04 -3.759 -3.759
I-3-30A1 MW 1.10 3.87E-04 -3.412
I-3-30B1 MW 0.63 2.23E-04 -3.651
I-3-30B2 MW 0.67 2.36E-04 2.82E-04 -3.627 -3.563
PZ-1#1 Pond 3.49 1.23E-03 -2.910
PZ-1#2 Pond 3.56 1.26E-03 1.24E-03 -2.901 -2.905
P3-95 NEC Pond 0.98 3.46E-04 -3.461
P3-95 NEC Pond 0.81 2.87E-04 -3.542
P3-95 NEC Pond 0.85 3.01E-04 3.11E-04 -3.522 -3.508
P3-95 SWC Pond 0.13 4.53E-05 -4.344
P3-95 SWC Pond 0.10 3.48E-05 4.01E-05 -4.458 -4.401
P3-97 NEC Pond 0.73 2.58E-04 -3.589
P3-97 NEC Pond 0.32 1.13E-04 1.86E-04 -3.945 -3.767
P3-97 NECR Pond 0.26 9.17E-05 9.17E-05 -4.038 -4.038
EW-901 #1 NA 1.66 5.86E-04 -3.232
EW-901 #2 NA 1.49 5.26E-04 5.56E-04 -3.279 -3.256
TABLE 3
SITE-WIDE HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY TEST RESULTS
ENERGYSOLUTIONS , LLC.
T3-7
Well/Test Cell(s)
Hydraulic
Conductivity
(ft/day)
Hydraulic
Conductivity
(cm/sec)
Well Hydraulic
Conductivity
(cm/sec)
Log Hydraulic
Conductivity
(log[cm/sec])
Well Hydraulic
Conductivity
(log[cm/sec])
DH-31B2 MW 2.66 9.39E-04 -3.027
DH-31B3 MW 2.43 8.56E-04 8.76E-04 -3.067 -3.058
DH-32A1 LARW 0.03 1.08E-05 -4.968
DH-32A2 LARW 0.03 1.17E-05 1.12E-05 -4.931 -4.949
DH-33A1 MW 0.01 2.23E-06 2.23E-06 -5.652 -5.652
DH-59A1 11.e(2)0.19 6.55E-05 -4.184
DH-59A2 11.e(2)0.69 2.43E-04 -3.615
DH-59A3 11.e(2)0.86 3.04E-04 2.04E-04 -3.517 -3.772
DH-62A1 11.e(2)2.94 1.04E-03 -2.985
DH-62A3 11.e(2)2.94 1.04E-03 -2.985
DH-62B2 11.e(2)2.87 1.01E-03 1.03E-03 -2.995 -2.988
Mean log[K]-3.224
Mean K (cm/s)1.13E-03 Geo Mean K 5.96E-04
Site-wide Mean K
Site-wide Geometric Mean K
90% UCL Site-wide Geometric Mean K 7.31E-04
90% LCL Site-wide Geometric Mean K 4.86E-04
Note: Data from deep aquifer well GW-139D not included in statistical calculations.
T4-1
Well COORDINATES Pro. Casing to Water Water Specific
ID Area Easting Northing w/o Lid
(feet)(feet)(ft amsl)(feet)(ft amsl)(ft amsl)
GW-16R LARW 1,193,928.8 7,422,886.6 4,281.12 32.32 4,248.80 4,248.86 1.030
GW-19A 11.e.(2)1,189,864.7 7,421,007.7 4,270.79 18.30 4,252.49 4,252.72 1.032
GW-19B Deep Well 1,189,864.3 7,420,999.9 4,270.69 21.05 4,249.64 4,250.74 1.016
GW-20 11.e.(2) LARW 1,192,617.2 7,421,988.4 4,276.60 25.80 4,250.80 4,250.98 1.034
GW-22 LARW 1,193,462.9 7,422,929.9 4,277.25 28.15 4,249.10 4,249.16 1.028
GW-23 LARW 1,193,052.8 7,422,934.6 4,276.63 27.11 4,249.52 4,249.62 1.032
GW-24 11.e.(2) LARW 1,192,636.4 7,422,837.9 4,276.69 26.72 4,249.97 4,250.05 1.024
GW-25 11.e.(2)1,191,653.8 7,423,063.1 4,276.24 25.64 4,250.60 4,250.77 1.034
GW-26 11.e.(2)1,190,914.9 7,423,076.1 4,274.67 23.74 4,250.93 4,251.07 1.036
GW-27 11.e.(2)1,190,080.1 7,423,096.0 4,272.43 21.65 4,250.78 4,250.97 1.038
GW-27D Deep Well 1,190,079.3 7,423,071.4 4,273.67 24.36 4,249.31 4,250.41 1.016
GW-28 11.e.(2)1,190,065.0 7,422,152.4 4,271.26 19.31 4,251.95 4,252.17 1.036
GW-29 11.e.(2) LARW 1,192,602.0 7,421,099.4 4,276.32 24.94 4,251.38 4,251.48 1.022
GW-36 Pond Well 1,190,699.5 7,421,642.8 4,272.09 19.06 4,253.03 4,253.25 1.032
GW-37 11.e.(2)1,191,256.3 7,422,025.7 4,270.88 18.59 4,252.29 4,252.52 1.034
GW-38R 11.e.(2)1,191,202.0 7,422,392.3 4,275.70 23.80 4,251.90 4,252.12 1.032
GW-56R LARW 1,193,952.3 7,422,491.1 4,279.19 30.21 4,248.98 4,249.08 1.030
GW-57 11.e.(2)1,190,072.5 7,422,629.2 4,271.88 20.60 4,251.28 4,251.47 1.034
GW-58 11.e.(2) Pond Well 1,190,084.7 7,421,679.4 4,271.38 18.74 4,252.64 4,252.93 1.040
GW-60 11.e.(2)1,191,831.9 7,420,943.4 4,274.79 21.29 4,253.50 4,253.51 1.002
GW-63 11.e.(2)1,190,937.2 7,420,971.1 4,272.04 18.13 4,253.91 4,254.03 1.016
GW-64 LARW 1,193,904.2 7,421,623.1 4,278.96 29.41 4,249.55 4,249.67 1.034
GW-66R Pond Well 1,194,183.8 7,421,240.1 4,281.77 32.62 4,249.15 4,249.29 1.026
GW-77 LARW 1,193,897.5 7,421,068.4 4,282.96 33.25 4,249.71 4,249.87 1.032
GW-88 Class A 1,192,544.6 7,424,621.6 4,279.58 30.29 4,249.29 4,249.39 1.030
GW-89 Class A 1,192,538.6 7,424,228.2 4,279.35 29.92 4,249.43 4,249.53 1.030
GW-90 Class A 1,192,532.9 7,423,836.7 4,278.76 29.18 4,249.58 4,249.69 1.028
GW-91 Class A 1,192,526.7 7,423,442.1 4,278.48 28.89 4,249.59 4,249.70 1.030
GW-92 Class A 1,192,519.9 7,423,043.2 4,279.05 28.87 4,250.18 4,250.20 1.004
GW-93 Class A 1,192,132.2 7,423,053.1 4,277.86 27.61 4,250.25 4,250.42 1.036
GW-94 Class A 1,191,333.3 7,423,069.2 4,276.55 25.78 4,250.77 4,250.98 1.038
GW-95 Class A 1,190,503.5 7,423,084.6 4,274.63 23.80 4,250.83 4,250.98 1.036
GW-99 Class A 1,190,086.6 7,423,490.1 4,273.71 23.08 4,250.63 4,250.82 1.044
GW-100 Class A 1,190,095.3 7,423,883.1 4,274.37 23.88 4,250.49 4,250.61 1.030
TABLE 4
SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS
ENERGYSOLUTIONS
Measured 4th Quarter 2018
T4-2
Well COORDINATES Pro. Casing to Water Water Specific
ID Area Easting Northing w/o Lid
(feet)(feet)(ft amsl)(feet)(ft amsl)(ft amsl)
TABLE 4
SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS
ENERGYSOLUTIONS
Measured 4th Quarter 2018
GW-102 Class A 1,190,112.5 7,424,670.5 4,275.47 25.35 4,250.12 4,250.30 1.032
GW-103 LARW 1,192,748.0 7,420,884.8 4,278.30 27.37 4,250.93 4,251.21 1.034
GW-104 LARW 1,193,240.5 7,420,877.9 4,278.74 28.40 4,250.34 4,250.60 1.034
GW-105 LARW 1,193,731.0 7,420,869.9 4,279.22 29.30 4,249.92 4,250.11 1.030
GW-106 Class A North 1,190,128.0 7,424,985.7 4,276.18 26.11 4,250.07 4,250.34 1.034
GW-107 Class A North 1,190,138.4 7,425,378.5 4,276.26 25.92 4,250.34 4,250.55 1.026
GW-108 Class A North 1,190,148.1 7,425,724.7 4,275.96 25.68 4,250.28 4,250.54 1.032
GW-109 Class A North 1,190,431.3 7,425,719.1 4,276.46 26.28 4,250.18 4,250.42 1.032
GW-110 Class A North 1,190,759.6 7,425,712.9 4,276.72 26.69 4,250.03 4,250.25 1.030
GW-111 Class A North 1,191,086.4 7,425,706.8 4,277.07 27.13 4,249.94 4,250.14 1.028
GW-112 Class A North 1,191,421.8 7,425,701.5 4,277.40 28.07 4,249.33 4,249.57 1.036
GW-126 11.e(2) 1,192,625.7 7,422,412.9 4,279.08 28.74 4,250.34 4,250.51 1.032
GW-127 11.e(2) 1,192,607.5 7,421,543.2 4,278.36 27.27 4,251.09 4,251.28 1.032
GW-128 LARW 1,193,916.2 7,422,056.0 4,282.62 33.50 4,249.12 4,249.30 1.036
GW-129 Pond well 1,190,375.2 7,426,189.8 4,283.55 33.42 4,250.13 4,250.33 1.030
GW-130 Mixed Waste 1,194,288.6 7,422,901.3 4,281.15 32.66 4,248.49 4,248.60 1.024
GW-131 Mixed Waste 1,194,613.8 7,422,907.6 4,281.74 33.21 4,248.53 4,248.62 1.020
GW-132 Mixed Waste 1,194,937.0 7,422,912.3 4,282.95 34.49 4,248.46 4,248.57 1.026
GW-133 Mixed Waste 1,194,943.0 7,422,569.8 4,283.54 35.03 4,248.51 4,248.60 1.026
GW-134 Mixed Waste 1,194,938.8 7,422,238.2 4,285.28 36.69 4,248.59 4,248.67 1.022
GW-135 Mixed Waste 1,194,936.1 7,421,904.9 4,284.26 35.53 4,248.73 4,248.89 1.036
GW-136 Mixed Waste 1,194,930.0 7,421,583.2 4,283.79 34.99 4,248.80 4,248.94 1.030
GW-137 Class A North 1,191,789.8 7,425,698.9 4,278.43 29.20 4,249.23 4,249.38 1.030
GW-138 Class A North 1,192,096.3 7,425,695.2 4,279.42 30.53 4,248.89 4,249.10 1.036
GW-139 Class A North 1,192,429.7 7,425,689.5 4,282.92 34.25 4,248.67 4,248.79 1.034
GW-139D Deep Well 1,192,431.7 7,425,700.4 4,283.14 34.39 4,248.75 4,249.51 1.014
GW-140 Class A North 1,192,424.3 7,425,362.2 4,280.88 32.08 4,248.80 4,248.97 1.034
GW-141 Class A North 1,192,420.8 7,425,032.9 4,280.19 31.23 4,248.96 4,249.10 1.036
I-1-30 Mixed Waste 1,194,195.8 7,420,900.9 4,279.45 29.90 4,249.55 4,249.67 1.032
I-1-100 Deep Well 1,194,193.9 7,420,896.6 4,279.33 30.05 4,249.28 4,250.58 1.020
I-3-30 Mixed Waste 1,194,589.6 7,422,922.8 4,281.33 32.76 4,248.57 4,248.62 1.020
I-3-100 Deep Well 1,194,590.0 7,422,927.9 4,281.56 32.16 4,249.40 4,249.53 1.002
P3-95 NECR Pond Well 1,194,361.0 7,423,973.8 4,285.20 36.47 4,248.73 4,248.80 1.020
P3-95 SWC Pond Well 1,194,114.1 7,423,717.1 4,280.25 31.78 4,248.47 4,248.59 1.034
P3-97 NECR Pond Well 1,194,343.2 7,424,298.4 4,282.02 33.68 4,248.34 4,248.44 1.020
PZ-1 Pond Well 1,189,765.5 7,420,893.2 4,269.18 17.65 4,251.53 4,251.81 1.048
T5-1
Water Compliance
Area Type Maximum Minimum Average Gradient Limit Yes/No Geometric Mean Arithmetic Mean
Horizontal Velocity (ft/day)
TABLE 5
SUMMARY OF HORIZONTAL GRADIENTS AND VELOCITIES
ENERGYSOLUTIONS
Measured 4th Quarter 2018
Class A
All unconfined wells
11e.(2)
Class A North
Mixed Waste
Deep
LARW
Gradients
T6-1
Depth Saline Fresh Mid-Point of ∆
Well to Water Water Filter Pack Vertical ∆Vertical Vertical ∆Vertical Vertical Specific
(feet)(feet)(feet)(feet)(feet)(feet)(ft/ft)(ft/day)(feet)(ft/ft)(ft/day)
I-1-30 29.90 4249.55 4249.67 4247.8 1.032
I-1-100 30.05 4249.28 4250.58 4184.0 1.020
I-3-30 32.76 4248.57 4248.62 4249.5 1.020
I-3-100 32.16 4249.40 4249.53 4186.0 1.002
GW-19A 18.30 4252.49 4252.72 4246.1 1.032
GW-19B 21.05 4249.64 4250.74 4180.6 1.016
GW-27 21.65 4250.78 4250.97 4246.7 1.038
GW-27 Deep 24.36 4249.31 4250.41 4180.4 1.016
GW-139 34.25 4248.67 4248.79 4250.2 1.034
GW-139 Deep 34.39 4248.75 4249.51 4194.3 1.014
A negative vertical gradient = upward gradient
A positive vertical gradient = downward gradient
A negative vertical velocity = upward flow
A positive vertical velocity = downward flow
-1.47
-63.46
0.0435
0.0222
-65.48
-66.34
0.83
-2.85
-63.75 -0.27 -0.0144
-0.01430.91-0.0131
0.0042 0.921.20E-05
-3.70E-05
TABLE 6
SUMMARY OF VERTICAL GRADIENTS AND VELOCITIES
ENERGYSOLUTIONS
Measured 4th Quarter 2018
-55.93 0.08 -0.0015 0.72 -0.0129
Salt Water Fresh Water
-0.56 0.0084
0.03021.23E-04
6.27E-05
-4.20E-06
-4.07E-05
-4.04E-05
8.55E-05
2.38E-05
-3.65E-05
-1.98
T7-1
ID Area Easting Northing
GW-66R Pond Well 1,194,183.8 7,421,240.1 35,900 36,839 18
GW-83 Class A 1,191,104.5 7,424,649.8 33,900 34,573 33
GW-84 Class A 1,191,437.3 7,424,643.6 36,400 42,958 35
GW-85 Class A 1,191,760.6 7,424,637.2 42,800 42,852 35
TABLE 7
SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
ENERGYSOLUTIONS
T7-2
ID Area Easting Northing
TABLE 7
SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
ENERGYSOLUTIONS
GW-109 Class A North 1,190,431.3 7,425,719.1 40,200 37,973 26
GW-112 Class A North 1,191,421.8 7,425,701.5 46,200 47,648 25
GW-126 11.e(2) 1,192,625.7 7,422,412.9 42,800 45,164 22
GW-127 11.e(2) 1,192,607.5 7,421,543.2 43,300 38,368 22
GW-128 LARW 1,193,916.2 7,422,056.0 47,400 46,189 19
GW-129 Pond well 1,190,375.2 7,426,189.8 35,300 39,725 16
GW-130 Mixed Waste 1,194,288.6 7,422,901.3 31,100 33,325 12
GW-131 Mixed Waste 1,194,613.8 7,422,907.6 27,100 24,992 12
GW-132 Mixed Waste 1,194,937.0 7,422,912.3 37,600 34,442 12
GW-133 Mixed Waste 1,194,943.0 7,422,569.8 34,500 31,492 12
GW-134 Mixed Waste 1,194,938.8 7,422,238.2 28,900 27,608 12
GW-135 Mixed Waste 1,194,936.1 7,421,904.9 45,200 41,167 12
GW-136 Mixed Waste 1,194,930.0 7,421,583.2 36,500 32,542 12
GW-137 Class A North 1,191,789.8 7,425,698.9 41,800 43,642 12
GW-138 Class A North 1,192,096.3 7,425,695.2 58,700 51,567 12
GW-139 Class A North 1,192,429.7 7,425,689.5 47,900 49,717 12
GW-139D Deep Well 1,192,431.7 7,425,700.4
GW-140 Class A North 1,192,424.3 7,425,362.2 47,800 49,658 12
GW-141 Class A North 1,192,420.8 7,425,032.9 45,800 49,017 12
I-1-30 Mixed Waste 1,194,195.8 7,420,900.9 39,300 31,061 41
I-1-100 Deep Well 1,194,193.9 7,420,896.6
I-3-30 Mixed Waste 1,194,589.6 7,422,922.8 27,000 27,250 8
I-3-100 Deep Well 1,194,590.0 7,422,927.9
P3-95 NECR Pond Well 1,194,361.0 7,423,973.8 23,900 24,428 18
P3-95 SWC Pond Well 1,194,114.1 7,423,717.1 46,200 53,882 38
P3-97 NECR Pond Well 1,194,343.2 7,424,298.4 25,900 25,921 19
PZ-1 Pond Well 1,189,765.5 7,420,893.2
- Outliers removed in accordance with procedure given in Comprehensive Groundwater Qual Eval Rpt (March 19, 2014; CD14-0056).

Figures
Qlf QlfQlf
Qlf?Qlf?Qlf?
Qlg
Qlg
Qlf1
Qls
Qls
30 2829
3231 33
56 4
CLIVE, UTAH
DATE
BY
DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE
REV.DATESCALE
DRAWING NO.
APPROVED BY
REVIEWED BY
DRAFTED BY
1" = 2000'10/30/12
R.JOHNSON, SWCAM. LEBARONR.SOBOCINSKI00.5 10.25 Miles
FIGURE 3
REGIONAL GEOLOGIC MAP
FIGURE 3
Section Boundary
Geology
Quaternary lacustrine gravel
Quaternary lacustrine sand
Quaternary lacustrine mud
Quaternary younger alluvial fan deposits
Qlg
Qls
Qlf1
Qlf
32
29
31 33
56 4
30 28
T 1S
R 11W
SITE LOCATION
SLC BASE
EMBANKMENT
CLASS A
EMBANKMENT
LARW
EMBANKMENT
VITRO
11e(2)
EMBANKMENT
32 RS
RS
RS
RS
RS
RS
RSRS
RS
RS32
32
32
31
31
6 5
29 28
33
2930
45
3332
Southwest
Pond
2000Pond
MW
Pond
P3-97Pond
P3-95Pond
Cover Test Cell
CLASS A NORTH
MIXED WASTE
EMBANKMENT
EMBANKMENT
C
A
1
B
2 3
D
E
1 2 3
C
4 5
A
6
FIGURE 4
1" = 900'
DRAWING NO.
R. SOBOCINSKIAPPROVED BY
SCALE 12/14/18DATE REV.
R. SOBOCINSKI
S. GURRREVIEWED BY
DRAFTED BY
B
4 5
D
E
6
0
LEGEND
SECTION BOUNDARY
CLASS A WEST EMBANKMENT
GW-129 GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
10 - THICKNESS OF HYDROSTRATIGRAPHIC
UNIT 4 (feet)
CONTOUR INTERVAL 1.0 foot
0 900 1,800 2,700 feet
32
29
31 33
56 4
30 28
T 1S
R 11W
SITE LOCATION
SLC BASE
EMBANKMENT
CLASS A
EMBANKMENT
LARW
EMBANKMENT
VITRO
11e(2)
EMBANKMENT
32 RS
RS
RS
RS
RS
RS
RSRS
RS
RS32
32
32
31
31
6 5
29 28
33
2930
45
3332
Southwest
Pond
2000Pond
MW
Pond
P3-97Pond
P3-95Pond
Cover Test Cell
CLASS A NORTH
MIXED WASTE
EMBANKMENT
EMBANKMENT
C
A
1
B
2 3
D
E
1 2 3
C
4 5
A
6
FIGURE 5
1" = 900'
DRAWING NO.
R. SOBOCINSKIAPPROVED BY
SCALE 12/17/18DATE REV.
R. SOBOCINSKI
S. GURRREVIEWED BY
DRAFTED BY
B TO
P

O
F

U
N
I
T

2

C
L
A
Y

S
T
R
U
C
T
R
U
A
L

C
O
N
T
O
U
R

M
A
P
RE
V
I
S
E
D

H
Y
D
R
O
G
E
O
L
O
G
I
C

R
E
P
O
R
T
FI
G
U
R
E

5
CL
I
V
E
,

U
T
A
H
4 5
D
E
6
-
DA
T
E

B
Y
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N

O
F

C
H
A
N
G
E
0
LEGEND
SECTION BOUNDARY
CLASS A WEST EMBANKMENT
GW-129 GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
4,252 - ELEVATION OF TOP OF
HYDROSTRATIGRAPHIC UNIT 2 (feet amsl)
CONTOUR INTERVAL 2.0 feet
0 900 1,800 2,700 feet
GFED
C
B
A G'F'
C'
B'
E'
D'
A'
Distance (feet)
Feet above mean sea level
A A'
Unit 4
Unit 3
Unit 2
Unit 1
?
?
GW-139
GW-139D
GW-109
GW-110
GW-111
GW-112
GW-137
GW-138
GW-139
GW-139D
GW-8
GW-21
SC-5
SC-11
ML
CL-ML
SP-SM
CL-ML
SP-SM
ML
CL
SM
CL
ML
ML-CL
CL
SM
CL
ML
CL
SM
CL
ML
CL
SM
ML
SM
ML
CL
CL-ML
SP-SMSC-ML
CL-ML
CL
SM-ML
CL
ML-SM
CL
SM-ML
CL
SM
CL-ML
SM-ML
CL-ML
CL-ML
SM-ML
ML
SM
SC-SM
SM
ML-CL
CL
SM
CL
CL
CL
SM
SM-CL
250
250
500
500
750
750
1000
1000
1250
1250
1500
1500
1750
1750
2000
2000
2250
2250
2500
2500
2750
2750
3000
3000
3250
3250
3500
3500
3750
3750
4000
4000
4250
4250
4500
4500
4750
4750
5000
5000
5250
5250
5500
5500
5750
5750
4180 4180
4190 4190
4200 4200
4210 4210
4220 4220
4230 4230
4240 4240
4250 4250
4260 4260
4270 4270
4280 4280
4290 4290
Sediments with lowhydraulic conductivity
Sediments with moderate tohigh hydraulic conductivity
Groundwater surface, shallow aquifer,freshwater equivalent, December 2011(from data in Table 4)
Well casing
Filter pack of well
Screened interval of well
HYDROGEOLOGIC CROSS-SECTION A-A'
Note: Some logs are offsetfrom section line as shown onFigure 6.
CH – High plasticity clayCL – ClayGC – Clayey gravelGM – Silty gravelGP – Poorly graded gravelGW – Well graded gravelML – SiltSC – Clayey sandSM – Silty sandSP – Poorly graded sand
FIGURE 7
CLIVE, UTAH
DATE
BY
DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE
REV.DATESCALE
DRAWING NO.
APPROVED BY
REVIEWED BY
DRAFTED BY
1" = 500'10/12/12
FIGURE 7
R.JOHNSON, SWCAM. LEBARONR.SOBOCINSKI
GFED
C
B
A G'F'
C'
B'
E'
D'
A'
Distance (feet)
Feet above mean sea level
B B'
Unit 4
Unit 3
Unit 2
Unit 1
GW-6
GW-81
GW-82
GW-83
GW-84
GW-85
GW-86
GW-88
SC-6 SC-9
SC-12
SLC-202
?
?
CL
CL-ML
SP-SMSC-ML
CL-ML
CL
SM
CL
SMCL
SM
CL
SM
CL
SM
CL
SM
CL
CL
SM
CLSM
CL
SP-GP
SM
CH-CL
CL
CL
SM
CL-SM
SM
CL
CL-ML
SP-SM
CL-ML
SP-SM
CL
SM
CL
CL
SM-CL
ML
SM-CL
CL
SM
CL
SM
CL-ML
CL-ML
SP-SMSM-SC
CL-ML
CL
SM
CL
SM
250
250
500
500
750
750
1000
1000
1250
1250
1500
1500
1750
1750
2000
2000
2250
2250
2500
2500
2750
2750
3000
3000
3250
3250
3500
3500
3750
3750
4000
4000
4250
4250
4500
4500
4750
4750
5000
5000
5250
5250
4170 4170
4180 4180
4190 4190
4200 4200
4210 4210
4220 4220
4230 4230
4240 4240
4250 4250
4260 4260
4270 4270
4280 4280
4290 4290
Sediments with lowhydraulic conductivity
Sediments with moderate tohigh hydraulic conductivity
Groundwater surface, shallow aquifer,freshwater equivalent, December 2011(from data in Table 4)
Well casing
Filter pack of well
Screened interval of well
HYDROGEOLOGIC CROSS-SECTION B-B'
Note: Some logs are offsetfrom section line as shown onFigure 6.
CH – High plasticity clayCL – ClayGC – Clayey gravelGM – Silty gravelGP – Poorly graded gravelGW – Well graded gravelML – SiltSC – Clayey sandSM – Silty sandSP – Poorly graded sand
FIGURE 8
CLIVE, UTAH
DATE
BY
DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE
REV.DATESCALE
DRAWING NO.
APPROVED BY
REVIEWED BY
DRAFTED BY
1" = 500'10/12/12
FIGURE 8
R.JOHNSON, SWCAM. LEBARONR.SOBOCINSKI
GFED
C
B
A G'F'
C'
B'
E'
D'
A'
Distance (feet)
Feet above mean sea level
C C'
Unit 4
Unit 3
Unit 2
Unit 1
?
SLC-204
GW-27D
I-3-50
I-3-100
GW-27
GW-27D
I-3-30
I-3-50
I-3-100
???SMCL
CL
SM
ML
CL
GM
SM
ML
GW-16R
GW-22
GW-23
GW-25
GW-26
GW-27
GW-92
GW-93
GW-94
GW-95 GW-130
GW-132
I-3-30
CL
SM
CLSMCLSM
CLSM
CL
SM
CL
CL-ML
SM
CL-CH
SM
CL
SM
CL
CL
SMCL
SM
CL
CL
SM-CL
CL
CL
SM
ML
CL
SM
CL
GM
CL
SM
CL
CL
SM
CL
CL
SM
CL
CL
SM-ML
CL
ML-SM
CL
SC-SM
CL-ML
SC
ML-CL
SC-SM
CL
SM
CL
SM
CL
SM
ML
CL
CL
ML-CL
ML-SM
SM-CL-ML
250
250
500
500
750
750
1000
1000
1250
1250
1500
1500
1750
1750
2000
2000
2250
2250
2500
2500
2750
2750
3000
3000
3250
3250
3500
3500
3750
3750
4000
4000
4250
4250
4500
4500
4750
4750
5000
5000
5250
5250
4170 4170
4180 4180
4190 4190
4200 4200
4210 4210
4220 4220
4230 4230
4240 4240
4250 4250
4260 4260
4270 4270
4280 4280
4290 4290
Sediments with lowhydraulic conductivity
Sediments with moderate tohigh hydraulic conductivity
Groundwater surface, shallow aquifer,freshwater equivalent, December 2011(from data in Table 4)
Well casing
Filter pack of well
Screened interval of well
HYDROGEOLOGIC CROSS-SECTION C-C'
Note: Some logs are offsetfrom section line as shown onFigure 6.
CH – High plasticity clayCL – ClayGC – Clayey gravelGM – Silty gravelGP – Poorly graded gravelGW – Well graded gravelML – SiltSC – Clayey sandSM – Silty sandSP – Poorly graded sand
FIGURE 9
CLIVE, UTAH
DATE
BY
DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE
REV.DATESCALE
DRAWING NO.
APPROVED BY
REVIEWED BY
DRAFTED BY
1" = 500'10/12/12
FIGURE 9
R.JOHNSON, SWCAM. LEBARONR.SOBOCINSKI
GFED
C
B
A G'F'
C'
B'
E'
D'
A'
Distance (feet)
Feet above mean sea level
D D'
Unit 4
Unit 3
Unit 2
Unit 1
?
I-1-30
GW-19A
DH-54
GW-19A
GW-19B
I-1-30
I-1-50
I-1-100
DH-52
GW-19B
GW-60
GW-63
GW-103
GW-104
GW-105
I-1-100
PZ-1
I-1-50
CL
SM
CL
SM
CL
SM
CL
SM
CL
SM
CL
CL
SM
CL
CL
SM
CL
CL
SM
ML
CL
ML
CL
SM
ML
CL
CL
SM-CL
CL
CL
SM
CL
CL
SM
CL
SC
CL
SM
CL
SM
CL
SM
CL
CL
ML
250
250
500
500
750
750
1000
1000
1250
1250
1500
1500
1750
1750
2000
2000
2250
2250
2500
2500
2750
2750
3000
3000
3250
3250
3500
3500
3750
3750
4000
4000
4250
4250
4500
4500
4750
4750
5000
5000
5250
5250
4170 4170
4180 4180
4190 4190
4200 4200
4210 4210
4220 4220
4230 4230
4240 4240
4250 4250
4260 4260
4270 4270
4280 4280
Sediments with lowhydraulic conductivity
Sediments with moderate tohigh hydraulic conductivity
Groundwater surface, shallow aquifer,freshwater equivalent, December 2011(from data in Table 4)
Well casing
Filter pack of well
Screened interval of well
HYDROGEOLOGIC CROSS-SECTION D-D'
Note: Some logs are offsetfrom section line as shown onFigure 6.
CH – High plasticity clayCL – ClayGC – Clayey gravelGM – Silty gravelGP – Poorly graded gravelGW – Well graded gravelML – SiltSC – Clayey sandSM – Silty sandSP – Poorly graded sand
FIGURE 10
CLIVE, UTAH
DATE
BY
DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE
REV.DATESCALE
DRAWING NO.
APPROVED BY
REVIEWED BY
DRAFTED BY
1" = 500'10/12/12
FIGURE 10
R.JOHNSON, SWCAM. LEBARONR.SOBOCINSKI
GFED
C
B
A G'F'
C'
B'
E'
D'
A'
Distance (feet)
Feet above mean sea level
E E'
Unit 4
Unit 3
Unit 2
Unit 1
??
?
GW-19A
GW-19B
GW-27D
GW-27
SC-ML
DH-47
CL
SM
CL
SM
CL CL
SM
GW-19A
GW-19B
GW-27
GW-27D
GW-28
GW-57
GW-58
GW-99
GW-100
GW-101
GW-102
GW-106
GW-107
GW-108
SC-2
SC-5
SC-6
CL
SM
CL
SM
CL
SM
CL
SM
CL
ML-CL
CL
SM-SC
CL-ML
SP-SM
CL
SM
CL
CL
SM-CL
CL
CL
SM
CLSMCLSM
CLSM
CL
SM
ML
CL
GM
SM
ML
CL CL
SM
CL
SM
CL
SM-CL
CL
SM-CL
CL
ML
CL
SMCL
SM
CL
SM
CL
SP-SM
CL-ML
CL
SM-CL
SM
CL
CL-ML
SM
CL
SM
ML
CL
ML-CL
SM
ML-CL
CL
ML
CL
SM
ML
SM
CL
ML
SP-SM
CL-ML
SP-SM
CL-ML
CL-ML
250
250
500
500
750
750
1000
1000
1250
1250
1500
1500
1750
1750
2000
2000
2250
2250
2500
2500
2750
2750
3000
3000
3250
3250
3500
3500
3750
3750
4000
4000
4250
4250
4500
4500
4750
4750
5000
5000
5250
5250
4170 4170
4180 4180
4190 4190
4200 4200
4210 4210
4220 4220
4230 4230
4240 4240
4250 4250
4260 4260
4270 4270
4280 4280
Sediments with lowhydraulic conductivity
Sediments with moderate tohigh hydraulic conductivity
Groundwater surface, shallow aquifer,freshwater equivalent, December 2011(from data in Table 4)
Well casing
Filter pack of well
Screened interval of well
HYDROGEOLOGIC CROSS-SECTION E-E'
Note: Some logs are offsetfrom section line as shown onFigure 6.
CH – High plasticity clayCL – ClayGC – Clayey gravelGM – Silty gravelGP – Poorly graded gravelGW – Well graded gravelML – SiltSC – Clayey sandSM – Silty sandSP – Poorly graded sand
FIGURE 11
CLIVE, UTAH
DATE
BY
DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE
REV.DATESCALE
DRAWING NO.
APPROVED BY
REVIEWED BY
DRAFTED BY
1" = 500'10/12/12
FIGURE 11
R.JOHNSON, SWCAM. LEBARONR.SOBOCINSKI
GFED
C
B
A G'F'
C'
B'
E'
D'
A'
Distance (feet)
Feet above mean sea level
F F'
Unit 4
Unit 3
Unit 2
Unit 1
?
GW-139D
GW-139
GW-20
GW-24
GW-29
GW-88
GW-89
GW-90
GW-91
GW-92
GW-103
GW-126
GW-127
GW-139
GW-139D
GW-17A
GW-117
GW-125
SC-1
CL
SM
ML
CL
CL
SM
CL
CL
SM-SC
CLSM
CL
CL
SM
CL
CL
SM-SC
CL
CL
SM
CL
CL
SM
CL
CL
SM
CL
ML
CL
SM
CLSM
CL
ML
SPML
SP-SM
SM-SC
CL-ML
SM-CL-ML
SM
SP-SM
ML
CL
SM
CLSMCL
SM
ML
CL
ML
CL
SM
CL
SMCLSM
CL
CL
SM
CL
SM
CLML
CL
CL
SM
CL
ML
CL
SMML
SM
ML
CL
CL-ML
SM-ML
CL-ML
CL-ML
ML
SM
SM
ML-CL
SC-SM
SM-ML
250
250
500
500
750
750
1000
1000
1250
1250
1500
1500
1750
1750
2000
2000
2250
2250
2500
2500
2750
2750
3000
3000
3250
3250
3500
3500
3750
3750
4000
4000
4250
4250
4500
4500
4750
4750
5000
5000
5250
5250
4180 4180
4190 4190
4200 4200
4210 4210
4220 4220
4230 4230
4240 4240
4250 4250
4260 4260
4270 4270
4280 4280
4290 4290
Sediments with lowhydraulic conductivity
Sediments with moderate tohigh hydraulic conductivity
Groundwater surface, shallow aquifer,freshwater equivalent, December 2011(from data in Table 4)
Well casing
Filter pack of well
Screened interval of well
HYDROGEOLOGIC CROSS-SECTION F-F'
Note: Some logs are offsetfrom section line as shown onFigure 6.
CH – High plasticity clayCL – ClayGC – Clayey gravelGM – Silty gravelGP – Poorly graded gravelGW – Well graded gravelML – SiltSC – Clayey sandSM – Silty sandSP – Poorly graded sand
FIGURE 12
CLIVE, UTAH
DATE
BY
DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE
REV.DATESCALE
DRAWING NO.
APPROVED BY
REVIEWED BY
DRAFTED BY
1" = 500'10/12/12
FIGURE 12
R.JOHNSON, SWCAM. LEBARONR.SOBOCINSKI
GFED
C
B
A G'F'
C'
B'
E'
D'
A'
Distance (feet)
Feet above mean sea level
G G'
Unit 4
Unit 3
Unit 2
Unit 1
?
DH-54
GW-132
GW-133
GW-134
GW-135
GW-6
GW-21
GW-41
GW-67
GW-68
I-4-50
CL
SM
CL
CL
SMCL
SM
CL
SM
ML
CL
SM
CL
SM
CL
SM
CL
SM
CL
SM
CL
SMCL
CL
SM
CL
SMCL
ML
CL
SM-ML
ML-CL
CLSM-MLCL
SM-ML
ML
CL
SM-SC-CL
CL-ML
ML
CL
SM
ML
ML
CL
SM-CL
ML
SM-ML
CL-ML
ML
CL
SM-CL-ML
CL
ML-SM
ML-CL
CL
SM
CL
SM
CL
CL
SM
SM-CL
MLSM
250
250
500
500
750
750
1000
1000
1250
1250
1500
1500
1750
1750
2000
2000
2250
2250
2500
2500
2750
2750
3000
3000
3250
3250
3500
3500
3750
3750
4000
4000
4250
4250
4500
4500
4750
4750
5000
5000
5250
5250
5500
5500
4180 4180
4190 4190
4200 4200
4210 4210
4220 4220
4230 4230
4240 4240
4250 4250
4260 4260
4270 4270
4280 4280
4290 4290
Sediments with lowhydraulic conductivity
Sediments with moderate tohigh hydraulic conductivity
Groundwater surface, shallow aquifer,freshwater equivalent, December 2011(from data in Table 4)
Well casing
Filter pack of well
Screened interval of well
HYDROGEOLOGIC CROSS-SECTION G-G'
Note: Some logs are offsetfrom section line as shown onFigure 6.
CH – High plasticity clayCL – ClayGC – Clayey gravelGM – Silty gravelGP – Poorly graded gravelGW – Well graded gravelML – SiltSC – Clayey sandSM – Silty sandSP – Poorly graded sand
FIGURE 13
CLIVE, UTAH
DATE
BY
DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE
REV.DATESCALE
DRAWING NO.
APPROVED BY
REVIEWED BY
DRAFTED BY
1" = 500'10/12/12
FIGURE 13
R.JOHNSON, SWCAM. LEBARONR.SOBOCINSKI
32
29
31 33
56 4
30 28
T 1S
R 11W
SITE LOCATION
SLC BASE
EMBANKMENT
CLASS A
EMBANKMENT
LARW
EMBANKMENT
VITRO
11e(2)
EMBANKMENT
32 RS
RS
RS
RS
RS
RS
RSRS
RS
RS32
32
32
31
31
6 5
29 28
33
2930
45
3332
Southwest
Pond
2000
Pond
MW
Pond
P3-97
Pond
P3-95
Pond
Cover Test Cell
CLASS A NORTH
MIXED WASTE
EMBANKMENT
EMBANKMENT
C
A
1
B
2 3
D
E
1 2 3
C
4 5
A
6
FIGURE 14
1" = 900'
DRAWING NO.
R. SOBOCINSKIAPPROVED BY
SCALE 12/17/18DATE REV.
R. SOBOCINSKI
S. GURRREVIEWED BY
DRAFTED BY
B
4 5
D
E
6
0
LEGEND
SECTION BOUNDARY
CLASS A WEST EMBANKMENT
GW-129 GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
-3.25 - HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY (log10 cm/sec)
CONTOUR
CONTOUR INTERVAL 0.25 (log10 cm/sec)
0 900 1,800 2,700 feet
32
29
31 33
56 4
30 28
T 1S
R 11W
SITE LOCATION
SLC BASE
EMBANKMENT
CLASS A
EMBANKMENT
LARW
EMBANKMENT
VITRO
11e(2)
EMBANKMENT
32 RS
RS
RS
RS
RS
RS
RSRS
RS
RS32
32
32
31
31
6 5
29 28
33
2930
45
3332
Southwest
Pond
2000Pond
MW
Pond
P3-97Pond
P3-95
Pond
Cover Test Cell
CLASS A NORTH
MIXED WASTE
EMBANKMENT
EMBANKMENT
C
A
1
B
2 3
D
E
1 2 3
C
4 5
A
6
FIGURE 15
1" = 900'
DRAWING NO.
R. SOBOCINSKIAPPROVED BY
SCALE 12/17/18DATE REV.
R. SOBOCINSKI
S. GURRREVIEWED BY
DRAFTED BY
B
20
1
8

4
T
H

Q
T
R

S
H
A
L
L
O
W

A
Q
U
I
F
E
R

G
R
O
U
N
D
W
A
T
E
R

E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
RE
V
I
S
E
D

H
Y
D
R
O
G
E
O
L
O
G
I
C

R
E
P
O
R
T
FI
G
U
R
E

1
5
CL
I
V
E
,

U
T
A
H
4 5
D
E
6
-
DA
T
E

B
Y
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N

O
F

C
H
A
N
G
E
0
LEGEND
SECTION BOUNDARY
CLASS A WEST EMBANKMENT
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
4,250.0 - FRESH WATER EQUIVALENT
ELEVATION CONTOUR (feet amsl)
CONTOUR INTERVAL 0.5 feet
0 900 1,800 2,700 feet
4,250.0 - SALINE WATER ELEVATION
CONTOUR (feet amsl)
32
29
31 33
56 4
30 28
T 1S
R 11W
SITE LOCATION
SLC BASE
EMBANKMENT
CLASS A
EMBANKMENT
LARW
EMBANKMENT
VITRO
11e(2)
EMBANKMENT
32 RS
RS
RS
RS
RS
RS
RSRS
RS
RS32
32
32
31
31
6 5
29 28
33
2930
45
3332
Southwest
Pond
2000Pond
MW
Pond
P3-97Pond
P3-95Pond
Cover Test Cell
CLASS A NORTH
MIXED WASTE
EMBANKMENT
EMBANKMENT
C
A
1
B
2 3
D
E
1 2 3
C
4 5
A
6
FIGURE 16
1" = 900'
DRAWING NO.
R. SOBOCINSKIAPPROVED BY
SCALE 12/17/18DATE REV.
R. SOBOCINSKI
S. GURRREVIEWED BY
DRAFTED BY
B
4 5
D
E
6
0
LEGEND
SECTION BOUNDARY
CLASS A WEST EMBANKMENT
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
4,250.0 - 4TH QUARTER 2018 FRESH WATER
EQUIVALENT ELEVATION CONTOUR (feet amsl)
CONTOUR INTERVAL 0.5 feet
0 900 1,800 2,700 feet
4,250.0 - DECEMBER 2011 FRESH WATER
EQUIVALENT ELEVATION CONTOUR (feet amsl)
32
29
31 33
56 4
30 28
T 1S
R 11W
SITE LOCATION
SLC BASE
EMBANKMENT
CLASS A
EMBANKMENT
LARW
EMBANKMENT
VITRO
11e(2)
EMBANKMENT
32 RS
RS
RS
RS
RS
RS
RSRS
RS
RS32
32
32
31
31
6 5
29 28
33
2930
45
3332
Southwest
Pond
2000Pond
MW
Pond
P3-97Pond
P3-95Pond
Cover Test Cell
CLASS A NORTH
MIXED WASTE
EMBANKMENT
EMBANKMENT
C
A
1
B
2 3
D
E
1 2 3
C
4 5
A
6
FIGURE 17
1" = 900'
DRAWING NO.
R. SOBOCINSKIAPPROVED BY
SCALE 12/17/18DATE REV.
R. SOBOCINSKI
S. GURRREVIEWED BY
DRAFTED BY
B
20
1
8

4
T
H

Q
U
A
R
T
E
R

D
E
E
P

A
Q
U
I
F
E
R

G
R
O
U
N
D
W
A
T
E
R

E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
RE
V
I
S
E
D

H
Y
D
R
O
G
E
O
L
O
G
I
C

R
E
P
O
R
T
FI
G
U
R
E

1
7
CL
I
V
E
,

U
T
A
H
4 5
D
E
6
-
DA
T
E

B
Y
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N

O
F

C
H
A
N
G
E
0
LEGEND
SECTION BOUNDARY
CLASS A WEST EMBANKMENT
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
4,250.0 - FRESH WATER EQUIVALENT
ELEVATION CONTOUR (feet amsl)
CONTOUR INTERVAL 0.1 feet
0 900 1,800 2,700 feet
4,249.3 - SALINE WATER ELEVATION
CONTOUR (feet amsl)
GW-19B
32
29
31 33
56 4
30 28
T 1S
R 11W
SITE LOCATION
SLC BASE
EMBANKMENT
CLASS A
EMBANKMENT
LARW
EMBANKMENT
VITRO
11e(2)
EMBANKMENT
32 RS
RS
RS
RS
RS
RS
RSRS
RS
RS32
32
32
31
31
6 5
29 28
33
2930
45
3332
Southwest
Pond
2000Pond
MW
Pond
P3-97Pond
P3-95Pond
Cover Test Cell
CLASS A NORTH
MIXED WASTE
EMBANKMENT
EMBANKMENT
C
A
1
B
2 3
D
E
1 2 3
C
4 5
A
6
FIGURE 18
1" = 900'
DRAWING NO.
R. SOBOCINSKIAPPROVED BY
SCALE 12/17/18DATE REV.
R. SOBOCINSKI
S. GURRREVIEWED BY
DRAFTED BY
B
4 5
D
E
6
0
LEGEND
SECTION BOUNDARY
CLASS A WEST EMBANKMENT
GW-129 GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
42,000 - TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS (mg/L)
ISO-CONCENTRATION CONTOUR
CONTOUR INTERVAL 5,000 mg/L
0 900 1,800 2,700 feet

Appendix A
(provided on attached CD)

EnergySolutions
Groundwater Monitoring Well Boring Log
Project: Extraction Well near SW Pond Boring Number: EW-902
Date Drilled: 04/05/10 Date Completed: 04/06/10 Northing: 7,420,919.94 Easting: 1,189,817.05
Logged By: Robert Sobocinski Ground Surface Elevation (ft amsl): 4,268.80
Groundwater Elevation (ft amsl): 4,252.16 Measuring Point (MP) Elevation (ft amsl): 4,272.16
Date Measured: 04/06/10 MP is top of Protective Casing
Total Depth (ft): 35.0 feet bgs Drilling Contractor: RayCon Drilling
Diameter (in): 10.25 Drilling Method: Hollow Stem Auger
Well Screen: Diameter 4-inch I.D. Length 34.5 to 19.5 feet bgs Slot Size 0.010-inch
Casing: Diameter 4-inch I.D. Length 19.5 to 0.0 feet bgs Type PVC Sch. 40
Sand 35.0 to 17.1 feet bgs Bentonite Seal 17.1 to 12.4 feet bgs Grout 12.4 to 0.0 feet bgs
%
G
r
a
v
e
l
%
S
a
n
d
%
C
l
a
y
Bl
o
w
s

(
6

i
n
.
)
Sa
m
p
l
e

T
y
p
e
Sa
m
p
l
e

R
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
Gr
a
p
h
i
c
Lo
g
0 -15 25 60 NA SS 1.5 Sandy Silt - tan, some clay and gravel, mois
-
1 -0 25 75 Silty Clay - tan, some sand, mois
-
2 -0 25 75 NA SS 1.0 Silty Clay - med. tan/light tan mottled, some san
-
3 -0 10 90 Silty Clay - light tan, low plasticity, stiff, slightly mo
-
4 -0.0 No Recovery
-0.0
5 -0 30 70 NA SS 2.0 Sandy Silt/Silty Clay - med. gray/tan and light gray/tan interbedde
-moist
6 -0 5 95 Clay - light gray/tan and med. gray/tan, yellow-mottled, some si
-med. plasticity, med. stiff, mois
7 -0.0 No Recovery
-0 10 90 NA SS 1.5 Silty Clay - med. and light olive-gray, yellow/rust-mottle
8 -soft white crystals in voids, med. plasticity, stiff, w
-
9 -
-0.0 No Recovery
10 -0 5 95 NA SS 2.0 Clay - alternating thin interbeds, med. olive-gray and light gra
-med. plasticity, soft white crystals, very moist/we
11 -
-
12 -0.0 No Recovery
-0 5 95 NA SS 2.0 same as above
13 -0 65 35
-0 5 95 Silty Clay - med. olive-gray, med. plasticity, stiff, slightly mo
14 -
-0.0 No Recovery
15 -0 65 35 NA SS 2.0
-dense, moist
16 -Silty Sand - olive-tan, fine-grained, interbeds of sandy clay, dens
-moist
17 -0.0 No Recovery
-0 65 35 NA SS 1.5 Silty Sand - tan, rust-mottled, fine-gr, some clay, med. dense, w
18 -
-sharp contact with below
19 -0 15 85 Silty Clay - tan, med. plasticity, stif
-0.0 No Recovery
Stratigraphic Log
Silty Sand - yellow-tan, rust-mottled, fine-gr, some clay, moist
Silty Sand - yellow-tan, rust-mottled, some clay, fine-grained,
Sand - med. tan/yellow, med.-gr, poorly-sorted, very moist
Grain Size
De
p
t
h

(f
e
e
t
)
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
(f
e
e
t

a
m
s
l
)
CL
ML/
CL
CL
CL
4"Schedule
40 PVC
Casing
Bentonite
Seal
MP
(4,272.16)
4,269.57
ML
SM
Aquaguard
Grout
4,259.57
SM
CL
SS Split Spoon
1 of 2 EW-902
EnergySolutions
Groundwater Monitoring Well Boring Log
Project: Extraction Well near SW Pond Boring Number: EW-902
Date Drilled: 04/05/10 Date Completed: 04/06/10 Northing: 7,420,919.94 Easting: 1,189,817.05
Logged By: Robert Sobocinski Ground Surface Elevation (ft amsl): 4,268.80
Groundwater Elevation (ft amsl): 4,252.16 Measuring Point (MP) Elevation (ft amsl): 4,272.16
Date Measured: 04/06/10 MP is top of Protective Casing
Total Depth (ft): 35.0 feet bgs Drilling Contractor: RayCon Drilling
Diameter (in): 10.25 Drilling Method: Hollow Stem Auger
Well Screen: Diameter 4-inch I.D. Length 34.5 to 19.5 feet bgs Slot Size 0.010-inch
Casing: Diameter 4-inch I.D. Length 19.5 to 0.0 feet bgs Type PVC Sch. 40
Sand 35.0 to 17.1 feet bgs Bentonite Seal 17.1 to 12.4 feet bgs Grout 12.4 to 0.0 feet bgs
%
G
r
a
v
e
l
%
S
a
n
d
%
C
l
a
y
Bl
o
w
s

(
6

i
n
.
)
Sa
m
p
l
e

T
y
p
e
Sa
m
p
l
e

R
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
Gr
a
p
h
i
c
Lo
g
Stratigraphic Log
Grain Size
De
p
t
h

(f
e
e
t
)
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
(f
e
e
t

a
m
s
l
)
20 -0 20 80 NA SS 1.0
-very stiff, moist
21 -
-
22 -0.0
-0 70 30 NA SS 1.0 Silty Sand - dark gray, fine-grained, well-sorted, very dens
23 -wet
-
24 -
-0.0 No Recovery25 -NA SS 2.0 same as above, fining downward
-
26 -0 40 60 Sandy Silt - dark gray, some clay, very dense, moi
-
27 -0.0 No Recovery
-0 10 90 NA SS 2.0 Silty Clay - gray-green, med. plasticity, stiff, moi
28 -
-
29 -
-0.0 No Recovery30 -0 10 90 NA SS 2.0 Silty Clay - med. gray-green, dark gray-mottled, med. plasticit
-stiff, wet
31 -
-
32 -0.0 No Recovery
-0 35 65 NA SS 2.0 Sandy/Clayey Silt and Silty Clay - med. gray-green, interbedde
33 -some intervals wet, others mois
-
34 -
-
35 -
TD of boring - 35.0 feet bgs
No Recovery
Silty Clay - olive-gray, yellow-mottled, some sand,
ML
CL
16/30
SandSM
4"
Schedule
40 PVC
0.010-inch
screen
4,249.57
4,239.57
CL
ML/
CL
SS Split Spoon
2 of 2 EW-902
•
•
•
LOCAL STRATIGRAPHY AND WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY
SITE: ENVIROCARE OF UTAH, SOUTH CLIVE
IIELL NO.: GII-1
COORDINATES: SLBft Sec. 32, T1S, R1111, N 54.13, E 2004.09
(frOll SII corner)
DATE C~PLETED: 3-3-1988 AQUI FER: UpperllOlt
SUPERVISED BY: Robert E. Barto~ Delta Geotechnical Consultants, Inc.
LOCAL
STRATIGRAPHY
AND
WELL SCREEN
PLACE"ENT
Screen
JOB NO. 2352
Elevation of reference point *
Height of reference point
above ground surface
4274.78
2.58 ft
Depth of surface seal 18.0 ft
Type of surface seal: BENTONITE PELLETS AND GROUT
1.0. of surface casing 6.5"
Type of surface casing: STEEL
Depth of surface casing Unknown
I. D. of riser pipe 2.0"
Type of riser pipe: Sch. 40 PVC
Diameter of borehole 6.5"
Type of filler: BENTONITE PELLETS AND GROUT
Elev./depth of top of seal 0-18.0 ft
Type of seal: BENTONITE PELLETS AND GROUT
Type of gravel pack: SAND 8-12 (0.236 .. -0.17 .. )
Elev./depth of top of gravel pack
Elevation depth of top of screen
Description of screen: Hydrophilic Type II
2u-dialeter, Slot size: 0.020
4254.2
4252.2
I.D. of screen section 2.0·
Elev./depth of bottOil of screen
Elev./depth of bottOil of gravel pack
Elev./depth of bottOil of plugged
blank aection
Type of fiL ler below plugged section: UNKNOIIN
Elevation of botta. of borehole
4232.2
4232.2
m2.2
4230.7
* All elevations are in feet above mean sea level.
FIGURE'III-18
•
•
•
I.
MONITORING WELL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION WORKSHEET
GW-l
Kanitoring Uell Design
A. GU-' was designed according to the infor.ation on the well construction summary sheet.
II. Drilling Methods
A. Method. The well was drilled (bored) using a hollow-stem auger.
B. Drilling Fluids. No fluids were used during drilling.
c. Fluids Analysis. Since no fluid was used, none was analyzed.
D. Equipaent Cleaning. The drilling equipment was steam cleaned prior to drilling the well.
E. Compressed Air. No compressed air was used during drilling.
F. PotentiOlietric Surface. The procedure for establi shing the potentiOllletric surface wal not
doCuHnted by Envirocare. However, Delta Geotechnical enl,ured that this value was obtained using standard weLL­
installation procedures.
G. For.ation Samples.
,. Collection of Samples. Core samples were collected at varying intervals.
2. Sampling Methods. Samples were obtained with a split spoon .
3. Collection Intervals. Samples were taken at 5 and 10 foot intervals.
4. Chemical/Physical Tests. No chemical tests were performed on the samples. However, tests
were run to establish soil types and classifications.
III. Monitoring Uell Construction Haterials
A. Saturated Zone Priaary Casing. The well is constructed with Schedule 40 PVC threaded pipe.
B. Protective Caling. The weLL is protected with a 6.5" diaHter carbon steel casing.
C. Screen. The screen is a 2M diaHter PVC screen.
D. Steam Cleaning. The well construction Nterials were not steBII cleaned before installation.
However, they were purchased new f I'0Il the vendors.
IV. Well Intake Design and Well Devel~ent
A. Screen. A .anufactured Hydrophilic-brand Type II screen was installed. The PVC screen has a 2-
dillHter and is set frOil a depth of 20 to 40 feet.
B. Filter Pack. Ch .. ically-;nert gravel filter pack was installed fro. 18 feet to 40 feet. The well
has not been IIHlUred for turbidity.
C. Well Devel~t. The well was developed with teChniques including the use of a bailer.
V. Annular Space seals, Aprons, locks
A. Well Seal. The wel l is sealed frOil the ground lurface to 18 feet in depth with a ceaent-bentonite
mixture. The mixture was installed by dropping the material down the hole and tamping. No sealing was done in
the uturated zone. The well has been fitted with a 3x3-foot concrete apron and is locked to prevent tampering.
The well hal been fitted with a dedicated bladder pulp.
DB.lhI
LL PI W o
5
10
15
20
~
UJ UJ ...
~
::r ~ D. 25 LLJ c
30
35
40
45
JOB NO
•
DO OTHER TESTS
TEST HOLE NO. GW-l
ELEVATION
SOIL DESCRIPTION
'lO!>SOIJ .. : 211
SILT(r.n...), sandy, Il'Dist, bravn
C1...AY (CL), sandy, calcareou~,
4/12 50ft, \'1et, light bra.m5h-gray
SILT (Mr.), sandy, na:liul'l1 den~e,
20/12 noist, light bro.m
SAND (S!-1) , ni1ty, Iredium den.cre,
23/12 moist, light brown
9
CIAY(CL) , sandy, calcareous,
5/12 nedium stiff, wet, light gray'
brown
9/12
ClAY (CL), sandy, stiff, \.ret,
gray
roIH @ 41' 6"
Groundwater @ 23' 3"
LOG OF TEST HOLE
FIGURE
,
•
•
•
Test Hole GW-l
ElI ... I .... ___ • ___ ._ •••••.• __ .. ___ _
I" .... ' ..... S*L. ___ •.. _ ... _._. ____ ... _. __
REPORT OF WELL DRILLER
STAT.E OF UTAD C~I. H&. ________ • _______________ ___
C-.I", • ____ ._ ....... __ . ____ • _____ _ C-"~M H& ______________________ _
';ENERAL STATEMEJI.'T: Report d well driller II ".reby m .. d. and CiI~~ wll" t ... SLt.te Enrln •• r,ln aeeordane. with U..I ..... or ULt. ... CThla reporl .hall be Wed wtlh the State El'llril'llt, wilhla aD da" atte, the c:ampleLlon ar abal'ldonment Dr u. .... ll Fall"n to fII •• "c:h reporta c:aI'lIUI"tel • mildemeanor.)
(1) ... ---_ ....... _-(::j WELL TESTS: Dr ...... II ............. I. 'N' u.. .... , ..... II ....
Hart EnVirocare Inc. ., ....... Al.""''''.
... -175 S West 'J'eTp1e Suii'! 500 -lV .... ~ •• ""' _Nl .. f Y .. 0 H. II 11_' •• ~, ---
Ad ..... Sal~.~ City, Utah B4 16 -YI.I'I,,". ... _ •• u ....• 1" .•• ____ '001 .... _ 01 ... -.. -
(2) LOCATION OF WELL: n ~ ... -._ ..... --.. -------.. ..
e ........... 'Itloele ..... _._. c ...... W.I ..... 1. ________
~ ............ _--~ .. ..
u ••• ~ •• lIok' I. lin lui ,_ .... __ ...•• L/_Ia. ., ..... ______ ......... , •• ~ ., .. , ____ . ....-..
"""h • .:;.4 .•. 1.3 __ , .... Eo .... ~Qg_~.:_l!?._, .. 1 ·,--._~.c.n .. " ..... , ••• n.-. . ...... D." ..
::eeoc )II'aII)( Tn. ...... '.' ............ W ... .-...J.MboIo ... 1 He II Y. 0 -~,..
. ~2_,_. 'T ... _l ....... 1! .... 1L (13) WELL LOG: 1I~_ ... _oil ~5...--.. . __ --"'_ • t .ull •• ... w'_ hl~ • I JIe.'~ ."'1'" _ • _4l • .5-~Q H\.'.' ..... "' ...... ,'_ 1) ...... _ ....... 011 .-
(3) N.ATURE OF wome (check): )I .. w.n 0 ~r°!!.ll!~:.!.~ .:. -:;c.~~~.:-.:=:::'"_::~~d.u...::.. .=:~.: .. -~.::~ -=:-=
...... 1 .......... ' "-.1) 0 0.....,10. 0 ....... '0 ......... H 0 ... I,.~I ••• loft ....... urr ....• 1 •• IU •• , .... "'r. II ... h\ ............... -w __ c ...... r .. la ... c.h ,.,11t IIII""''&' u.. .......... l .1iI .. , U .........
It ................... , ........ rlaJ .u P, .... " t ___ • I)EPTH /IIATEAJAI.
I: I .II
(4) NATURE OF USE (check): :rttoring
j i . j . REXA .. JtI
X 1 ,
I . 't g J ! Do ... 11o 0 1 ..... &01.1 [J ........ p •• 0 .Lock_.a.t [J 8 ~ . E
lroto." 0 MI •••• 0 0 .... 0 T ... WoII 0
. .., ~ .a u ~ 0
(5) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION (check): 0 3 pC i~ aa">7 0 D .... 0 ~"""' 0 _1 9 Ix
c.w. 0 D,I ... 0 .-ar ....2.-114 x
l.!1 129 y I~ (6) C.ASlNG SCHEDULE: nu .... I!S w.w .. 0 29 41~ Ix
_ ... ~_. DIo ... ,,.. 0 /., .. ..ZIl......JooI c .. ...M......
...••• ___ -DI ... , .... ___ ....... ' .. 'C .. __
... ___ • Die ... ,,.. ' .. , ,,_-----1 .... c •• __
I
:ow 0 Bol ... 0 u..I 0 ---
(7) PERFORATIONS: '.".r ..... ' , .. 0 He e:I
Tr,. ., ",,'.'.Nr .Md ______ •
SI .... , .. r' .... u. ... ___ .----Iaeb_ ~' _____ luIo.
_, __ ,..-..... u... 'reln. ' .. t &0-'wi I . ___ ..".nUGM 'nlll .J .. , 10 'wi _ .•. --..... ',.,. .... ,.. 'olio .. 'wi ___ p.r'",u. •• ,,. _______ , .. \ ___ 'wi .. , ................ t .... to fool
(8) SCREENS: w.n u, ... I ......... ! Y. IX H. 0 M."' ... .......,.. ,. ... ...lWkOPb.Uic
"".. II ., ____ 11 .. 01 ,..
Df ....... 2~ __ "", ol .... 020_-IIot , ....... 2.O..-t .... ~
0.1 ..... ___ &I., .'H_ ... _ ... _s., 'nnn.... ___ '" .. ___
(9) CONSTRU CTION: -w •••• n .,. .. , ... ~ .. t Y .. ~ "·0 81 ... , ., ..... 8-12
Cr ... 1 .~ .... , ....... _.!10.1 ........ __ '001 ~.I 'olio w ••••• rfan ... 1 p .... a...r Y. HI J .. 0
T •• h< ...... ,_.18 I .J ..
M.\MI.I ....... _IL..BentcnitfLl!el Jets & .Grout ---I--D ... 11' Mn' ...... 11 •• " ....... Mr? Y. 0 He 0 T")op_ ., ...... ; ______ •• ______ • D", ., .tn~
NUM.d ..... 11 ... lir." .lIr. W .. k ....... rm-ch 3 _ uBB c..pI_ March 3 uaB
(14) PUMP:
"' ... w ........ , •• IN'" Y .. III Ifo 0 ...... ,.ct...". M. ___
W .. h. n .... t.tI I. pl ... 1 r .. m H. 0 ""..: -ILP
D ...................... ________ , ...
(10) W.ATER LEVELS: W.II Driller' .. Slat .... II': S .. 11o '-I .23,.3_,_., ... \>oJ-10 •••• rf ... D.M .•• Jl2laa
...... 1 ... 'I"ftIYI •.•••.•.• _ ..... ,"' .........•• r' __ D.M Thla •• 11 'tfU clrlll.d under JIIf '''pt"I.lan, and tbla report 1a tnM &0 ,h. be.' at m,. laIo .. l,d, ... nd belle,
LOC ·iii&iY~p.~ 1(11) FLOWING WELL: Nam • .D.el~ Geote~<a~~ts / Robert E. Bart "_.11.-. .. cor_"UI.) ~~ "itt"
~ C.Rlrwl ... kr IIh •• , V.I .. 0 Addn"P?W226t S Sa~_City, U B4
;';PI: :1 "C'. 0 PI.. [J He c.. .... 0 (SIP'd)<'~.6~~ I .' . 'Dc... •• n Inl .t.u •• ...aI.I' Y. 0 « D.IlIor)
o
I ;"ilE[' J::r(:. , ... No 0 Llc:en .. No • ..5.25...... Date. febnwl! 1~ 108B
:':51: OTIII:I\ elDz rOil ADDITIONAl. Jl,EMAIIE8
•
•
•
.'
LOCAL STRATIGRAPHY AND WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY
SITE: ENVIROCARE OF UTAH, SOUTH CLIVE
COORDINATES: SL8M Sec. 32, T1S, R11W, N 1608.04, E 5225.32
(frOll SII corner)
DATE COHPLETED: 3~4-1988 AQUIFER: UpperllOst
SUPERVISED BY: Robert E. Barton, Delta Geotechnical Consultants, Inc.
LOCAL
STRATIGRAPHY
AND
WELL SCREEN
PLACEMENT
Oft.
Elevation of reference point *
Height of reference point
above ground surface
4280.15
2.50 ft
Depth of surface seal 18.0 ft
Type of surface seal: BENTONITE PELLETS AND GROUT
I.D. of surface casing 6.5"
Type of surface casing: STEEL
Depth of surface casing Unknown
1.0. of riser pipe 2.0"
Type of riser pipe: Sch. 40 PVC
Dia.eter of borehole 6.5"
Type of filler: BENTONITE PELLETS AND GROUT
Elev./depth of top of seal 0-18.0 ft
Type of seal: BENTONITE PELLETS AND GROUT
.11~l-b~...t 'ack Type of gravel pack: SAND 8-12 (0.236 .. -0.17 .. )
--u .. ll
Screen
Elev./depth of top of gravel pack
Elevation depth of top of screen
Description of screen: Hydrophilic Type II
2"·diaaeter, Slot size: 0.020
1.0. of screen section
Elev./depth of botto. of screen
Elev./depth of bot to. of gravel pack
Elev./depth of botto. of plugged
blank section
Type of filler below plugged section: UNKNOWN
ELevation of bot to. of borehoLe
4259.65
4257.65
2.0"
4237.65
4237.65
4237.65
4236.15
* ALL elevations are in feet above aean sea level.
JOB NO. 2352 FIGURE· III-19
•
•
•
MONITORING WELL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION WORKSHEET
GW-2
I. Honitoring Yell DeslS"
A. GY·2 was designed according to the inforaation on the well construction summary sheet.
II. Drilling "ethads
A. "ethod. The well was drilled (bored) using a hollow·stem auger.
B. Drilling Fluids. No fluids were used during drilling.
C. Fluids Analysis. Since no fluid was used, none was analyzed.
D. Equipment Cleaning. The drilling equipment was steam cleaned prior to drilling the well.
E. Ca.pressed Air. No compressed air was used during drilling.
f. PotentiOlietric Surface. The procedure for establishing the potentiometric surface was not
docuented by Envirocare. However, Delta Geotechnical ensured that this value was obtained using standard weLL·
installation procedures.
G. Formation samples.
1. Collection of Samples. Core samples were collected at varying intervals.
2. Sampling Methods. Samples were obtained with a split spoon •
3. Collection Intervals. Samples were taken at 5 and 10 foot intervals.
4. Ch.-ical/Physical Tests. No chemical tests were performed on the samples. However, tests
were run to establish soil types and classifications.
III. Honitoring Well Construction Haterials
A. saturated Zone Primary Casing. The well is constructed with Schedule 40 PVC threaded pipe.
B. Protective Casing. The well is protected with a 6.5" diameter carbon steel casing.
C. Screen. The screen is a 2" diameter PVC screen.
D. Steam Cleaning. The weLL construction materials were not steam cleaned before instaLLation.
However, they were purchased new frOli the vendors.
IV. Yell Intake Design and Well Development
A. Screen. A manufactured Hydrophilic·brand Type II screen was installed. The PVC screen has a 2M
diueter and is set from a depth of 20 to 40 feet.
B. fi lter Pack. Chemically·;nert gravel fi lter pack was instaLLed from 18 feet to 40 feet. The well
has not been .. sured for turbidi ty.
C. Well Devela,.ent. The well was developed with techniques including the use of a bailer.
V. Annular Space Seals, Aprons, Locka
A. Well Seal. The well is sealed frOli the ground surface to 18 feet in depth with a cement-bentonite
mixture. The mixture was installed by dropping the material down the hole and tamping. No sealing was done in
the saturated zone. The well has been fitted with a 3x3-foot concrete apron and is locked to prevent tampering.
The well has been fitted with a dedicated bladder pump.
•
•
•
£. .. 1" .. __ .,. _______ ~ __ _
11_ ...... a. c:.. •• __ .• ____ 1'. a __ _
1 •• _",,--.. ________ _
RErORT OF WELL DRILLER
STATE OF UTAH
ANII ... "". ,. ... _88-16-01 ~I-l 4:1.1 .. ,., ... _____________ _
c ...... _____ .......... _____ _ ~MW "~ ________ ~ _______ _
~ ENERAL ST ATF.M ENT: R.porl 01 w.1I driller b hu.b, maele anel {II.ct .Ilh !.he Stat. En,lnler. In accordance .lth lhl I .... ot Utah . (Thll "port .hall bl m.eI with th. SLat. Ellrlllilf wlUl.lII .0 dall ah.r the c:omplltloll or abandonm.nt of till .,IL FaUllf' to till IIld!
report. conlUllltea a mlld~m .. nor.)
(1) , Hart Envrr'OCare Inc C::) WELL TESTS: ., ......... It , ......... _ I. ,"'" 1M ........... 1 It ......
,'''' ...... ,,"" .... L
Ha ..... 175 S West Temple Suite 500 -\v .. ., .tlM. '"' .... , , •• 0 ". Ii It ... .,. ...... , __________ •.
... ,_ Salt Lake City, Utah 84116 . , ..... : .••• _ , ._--" •• U.I .. wltL -'''' .,. ...... aIW ~
(2) LOCATION OF WELL: .2 ~ ... ---_._-.. .. -
e .. "." ., ... ~~L __ G ... It' w., ........ .. ._-. .. _--.. .. .. ...... ""."") D.IIo, ..... _____ .• 01.' ..... "Il~ .. ,", 'N ...... , .. , ___ .....
=.16D.8 .• 0.4. , .. I. ::.5225.....32-1 .. , , .. .....sL..c. ....
Ant" •• , ... ______ ~.-Ik" -.,.
T ..... '.''' ... t •• ""_ _W ...... IIIII ......... ' ,.. ti y-0
.f •• t .... 3.2 ... _. 1'_.1._ .. , _ .... II --ll..-. ~61J1M (.'rlke (13) WELL LOG: " .. ;..... •• , .. n __ ~.~L ______ • _ W¥Slt
.. , ... ,4 ••• , ....... , I)o.,~ •• n ..... _Al&5.... .. ___ , .. L ""~.f _,loW woll __ 4Q ___
(3) NATURE OF WORI( (check): " .... w.u Cti ~O!!.~I!~::' •• ~ ~~.~~~=:,::!::a. .... ..:~ 1:!L'~ 1l*Jt::It~--:-=:
11 ... 1 .. _. W.1I0 0.. ..... 1 •• 0 II_" 0 ........... 0 4 .. &, ....... , ....... e«.n'"H ., "."" .,.. IN ....... AM, •• , ..... et&.. ., .... w __ .... ... , .. I •••• ~ ...... 'aW".!. 1.1 ..... 1-' .~, II ......... . 11." __ 1. ._,1" _ ... ,101 ... _ ...... ,
lIr.rm .. ATDIAI..
I I ..
(4) NATURE OF USE (check):l'bnitoring X j! J J
IID1AIII'.
Well I ~ ! 1 1 i ~ o_u. 0 1 ....... 1.1 0 .... Id •• 1 0 .... k ..... ' 0 r. t
1"1 •• 1-0 I,nola .. 0 0 .... ' 0 T .. I w.n 0 "" .. .t u 0
(5) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION (check): 0 2 X ISandv
-}-23:-Ix !!;llndv a.&arp 0 II ... 0 J ..... 0 X ISiltv c.~ 0 D,I"" 0 II .... 0:[ .lL ~r ~Annv
(6) CASING SCUEDULE: n ...... 0 w.u.s 0 -_.2._-III .... ,,..--0......, .. , ..... ..20-.-.1 .. , G ... ~ -" ....... __ • III .... '""' __ -'''''' .... --J .. , c.,,,-
.... ..-.. __ .. 0 ..... ,,..---1 .. , ... __ --'", c .. __ ..... ~ .. ltd 0 1.1 .... 0
(7) PERFORATIONS: , .. ,., .... , Y.. 0 I N. II ,
'.I'7po .f ... '_ ........ ! II ... , .... , ......... lac" •• , ...... I ~,-., .... , ..... ''''M-'III I ----.... ,., ........ ,,.. ,"' &a ,~ ---_ .... ',., ....... , .... ,-... 1"", __ ' _,,"waU ... " .. , .. , ... -----'111 .---.JI'I1', ............. ,", .. 'M
(8) SCREENS: 11'.11 ... _ IMIAII • ., YM ~ N·O
M .... ' .. ' • ..,.. N._---H}/'drq;ID j ) i c
Tn>o-__ IL __ ._ .... ___ )1 .... 1 N.
DI ..... _2.'~ .... 61., .I"_~ 020..-... , ... ,_20._,1. ",-4.!l--
1)1 .... ___ • _I .. , .IM_. __ ...501 ...... --'1. "' ___
(9) CONSmUCTJON; .
\\'., ... 11 e".01 ....... , Yft II N. 0 II .. of ..... 11 B-12
c .... 1 ........ ,,.._4.(L ___ '''' '0 18 --'III
w ..... rt ................ , TN HI II. 0
T •• ~ ...... ~ , __ ...... l.B.-__ ., .. ,
M.""01 _,I __ h .. Der,tonj tB-pe' lets & grout
DW .Il' .v_, •••• t.aI~ ..... w. •• ,." T .. 0 II. 0
,..,.. •• 1 •• ht''-___ • II ... ,~ .1 ...... t.a---
M.~ .f _II ....... '" .ft. w •••• _~£b...1_ _u B8 c:-....... March 4 II 88
(14) PUMP:
w •••• " ... c ........ 141 , .. ~ II. 0 M .... , .. lIIr.,',t ,. .... _
W., 11_ .... I. ,I ... t Yft ~ N. 0 ,.,,.. --------a. ,_
(10) WATER LEVELS:
D .. ~ "' .............. 1 .. _________ ... 1_
,. .. 11 ..... I ... ;{!1 ..... S .. _ .. ,ft, "lo ............. D ..... 3/9/88 W.II Drlllrr'a Stat.menU
1hll .. ,n •• 1 elrllled IInder my IlIp."I,lon, Inel tM, repon .. true to Art ....... ,'"IV' ................ ,"t ...... ,.". _., ... lI.w th. be.t of m7 knowl.d,. and b.lI,f •
... OG iittEIVEO, (1) FLOWING WELL: Nlm • ..!&l~~.lSmsultants 1 Rotert E. Barto{
1'-, "_ .... _....... I,.".. .. lllta'l
C ... I .. I104 " (.~ ... ) V.I •• 0 ·Adelfl .. l~.lt-:-~!:: U= 84115 !\PI~ -i IS-! 0 '1 .. 0 N. CH.nl 0
1> ... ".n ...... rM" ... 1 •• 1 y-O
(Slpld) __ . .. .. L_ _ .
_II D.III .. )
\!'IATER AI\. ;'ii !.: N. 0 LleiM. No....515..M_ Da16 F.ebrJJir:l...l6 ,11 88
• SAL 1 L".I(!·: VSI: OTnr.a IIDI! TOR .A.1)lImO"AL IIb .... RU
I­
W W U.
~ :r
o
5
10
15
20
t 25 w o
30
35
40
45
JOB NO.
LL PI W DD OTHER TESTS
-
2/12
TEST HOLE NO. GV-2
ELEVATION
SOIL DESCRIPTION
'lOPSOIL: I"
SILT(ML), sandy, noist, bra.m
CI1\Y (CL), sandy, calcareous,
soft, \let, light brownish-gray
SAND (SM), silty, nedilUTl dense,
5/12 noist, brCMn
7/12 SAND (5.1'-1), si1 t~, \"/i th clay
lenses, neciilUTl dense, wet, bra.·m
9/12
ClAY (CL), sandy, calcareous,
stiff, "let, light grayish-bravn
ClAY (CL), sandy, silty,
2/12 calcareous, stiff, wet, light
brCMn
EOTH @ 41~'
Grourrlwat.er @ 29~'
LOG OF TEST HOLE
FIGURE
• PROJECT: Envirocare Landfill
DRILt HOLE LOG
DRILL HOLE NO.: GW-24
, CLIENT/OWNER: Envirocare of Utah
HOLE LOCATION: Northwest Corner of LARW Disposal Cell
DRILLER: Overland Drilling
DRILL RIG: CME 750
DEPTH TO WATER: 25.3 HOLE DIAMETER: 7.75"
SOIL SYM80L.S.
SAMPLER SYMBOLS uses O .. cripdon
AND FIELD TEST DATA
PROJECT NO.: 1416-020
DATE: 12-3-91
TOe ELEV.: 4276.59
GS ELEV.: 4274.91
LOGGEI>BY: DCH
HOLE NO.: GW-24
Slmpll S8Inpii RICOY'"
Numb., D.pm lin/inl (ftl
'ci'" ...................................................................
SR.TY CLAY: Browa, trace of fiDe 1IDCi. 17124 L·' 0·1
moist • ... pdes to nahl pay witb iron Ol:ide L·Z Z-4.' 30130 SlaiDia,.
L-3 4.5·7 30/30
L-4 Nt.5 30/30
......................................................................
SM SILTY SAND: Tan, fiDo to medium. moist. L·S '.5·12 12130
L·a 11·14.' 0130
.•. ,rades loss siley. L·7 14.5-17 15130
... grades silty . L.·a '7·19.5 0130
.•. interbedded reddish tID aad tID
silty SlDd. L·9 11.5·22 28/30
'ct'" "siLTY CLAy;'R~~'iU;'~y:'~i~m"'"
ltiff. moist. L." 24.5·27 30/30
L·tZ 27-29.5 30130
... Jndea to light p-ay. soft, moiat.
L.U ZIJ.5·32 30/30
... andes to wet.
35
•
••
•
DRILL HOLE LOG
DRILL HOLE NO.: GW·60
PROJECT: Envirocare LandfJll
CLIENT/OWNER: Envirocare of Utah
HOLE LOCATION: 10 feet west of GW·l
DRILLER: Overland Drilling Inc.
DRILL RIG: CME 750
DEPTH TO WATER: 23.46' HOLE DIAMETER: 7.75"
uses Descripuon
PROJECT NO.: 1534-007
DATE: 2-2-93
TOC ELEV.: 4274.50
GS ELEV.: 4272.7
LOGGED BY: DCH
HOLE NO.: GW-60
ample 0 th Recovery Is I slmp'el
Number ;'~l Iin"nl
o * , •• •• •• .,. ~ •••• ' ••••••• ~ •••••• ~ .............. , •••.•••••••••• , ••••••• , •••••
4270
5 3/12 2/6 316
4265
5/12 4/6 4/6
11/12 916
CL SILTY CLAY: Tan. roots in upper
12-inches, soft to medium stiff, moist.
... grades with iron oxide staining.
... grades to light gray, thin
horizontal bedding.
••••••••••••• ~ •••••••••• ~ ~ ••••• * •• , •••• , • •• • ••••••
B·l 5·' 24124
B-2 '·9 24124
B·3 9·11 24124
10 . ~ ...... 1116 SM SILTY SAND: Tan. fine to medium. medium
23/12 dellSe to dense. moist. a·4 11·13 23124
12/6 11/6
4260
15
. 1j/12 a·5 13·15 12124
Ijo~t
51/12 a·6 15·" 24124
1~6/6 416
17/12 B·7 "·19 23/24
4255 '!'6 .
20 ,.
I:
;
I: ..
... grades reddish tan. a·a 19·21 24124
... grades clayey. I a·g 21·23 24124
........ . ...............................
CL SILTY CLAY: Reddish tan, sandy. fine. a·l0 23·25 24124
sti fr. mo ist .
..• grades wet. a·ll 25·21 24/24
B·12 27.0·28 12112
Envirocare of Utah, Inc.
Groundwater Monitoring Well Boring Log
• : 12/9/02
Bentonite Seal feet
MP
Lithologic Log
0 or Processed Clay
2" 2
0 30 70 Clay -brown, some silt, damp
3
4 0 20 80 Clay with Sand -reddish brown, damp
5
Clay -light gray, moist, soft
6 • 7
8 0 25 75
9 0 75 25 Sand With Clay -moist, light gray, soft
10 '
11'
12 _orale
S.oI
13 0 80 20 NA Silty Sand -slightly moist, soft. some clay
14
15
16
17
18 0 Silty Clay-some sand, light gray to It brown, moist, finn
19
• CC Continuous Core Barre]
lof2 GW-126
•
20
21
22
23
24
25
26 • 27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
•
Envirocare of Utah, Inc.
Groundwater Monitoring Well Boring Log
Project: lle.(2) East Area
Date Drilled: 12/6/02 Date
0 3 97
0 20 80
0 5 95
Seal
Lithologic Log
Silty Clay. slightly moist to moist, light gray, finn to stiff
Clay· moist to very moist, soft, some sandy layers.
Clay -stiff, light gray, moist.
TO of boring • 36.0 feet
CC Continuous Core Barrel
20f2
4,255.52
4,250,52
16130
S""d
4,245,52
2"
Schedule
40 PVC
0.010-
inch
S1:rem
4,240,31
GW-126
BR -Correspondence -9/24/2007
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 0
9
10 0
II
12 0
13
14
IS 0
16
10
17
18
5
19
20 5
EnergySoilltiolTS
Groundwater Monitoring Well Boring Log
Stratigraphic Log
clay
FilL..
sift, some <:Iay. damp, finn, reddish staining.. light brown to
light brown to tan, damp, finn, some silt
day. light gray, moist soft, some reddish staining
SBtv c'l.v alternating light and dark laminations. silty partings
'M .Ipmy sand with clay, fine-grained, grayish brown, reddish sLaining.
sand with graveJ, grny'sh·brown, soft to fin-fl, tine-grained
sand, 1ight brown to lan, little day, some gravel, soft. tine­
"=I.",inOO
CC Continuous Core Barrel
SS Split Spooo Sampler
lof3
(4,1ll:3.S5
GW-129
lO/29/201C Page 1
:WBR Correspondence -9/24/2007
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29 "
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
EnergySo/utioflS
Groundwater !Vlonitoring Well Boring Log
Stratigraphic Log
Silty S!l"ld with some: gravel. tan, fine-grained. dry
1?'>::ls'ilN sand, reddish, no gl"avef1 soft. damp, fine-grained
sand, fine-grained, damp, reddish brown, finn
t:9~ 1;::~~~r~C:li~ay~,.O clayey sand~ finn, dnmp.lighf brown to tan. sand is
Silty sand, finewgrainoo, grayish brown, s.oft. moist, blue streaks,
dean lO't.···.· JSjl,~'sand. fine--grainoo, some silt~ light brown. several moist to wet
';0 •• 11_",-,33 fee' to 35 fret
•.•• , ,1'111;" sand. fine~grained, damp, firm. light groyish bro\\-TI
light gray wet sand layCl"S
FH,lillh,aefine clean wet sand layer less than one inch thick
light brown, damp. firm
clay. wet, hluish greenish gray
sandy with silt. wet, light bluish gray
CC Conrinuous Core BarreJ
55 Split Spoon Sampler
2of3
40
"'"
inch
s.""n
414(J.1O
GW-129
9/2010 Page 1
LBR -corresP9ndence
41
42
43
9/24/2007
EnergySolutions
Groundwater MOllitoring Well Boring Log
Seal
Stratigraphic Log
Silty sand with cloy, light brown. wet
Sandy day with silt, moist to wet. light blui,h grey, finn.
CC ConlinLJous ('ore Barre!
5S Split Spoon Sampler
3 00 GW-129
10/29/20:0 Fage 12
•
o
2
3
4
5
6 • 7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1&
19
•
EnergySo/utions
Groundwater Monitoring Well Boring Log
. 08/06/09
1"'-"'55"'" By: Robert Sobocinski
UHJunuw:areI Elevation (ft amsl): 4,248.47
08/18/09
5
5
0
0
0
0 70
0 40
0 65
0 35
0 70
2-inch l.D.
Stratigraphic Log
gravel present
Silty Clay -olive-tan, rust-mottled, 'moist, gravel present
Silty Clay -olive-gray with light gray silty interbeds, moist, med.
1 astic, stiff
Silty Clay -thinly-bedded, light and medium gray, moist, med.
stiff
Sand -olive-tan, well-sorted, fine-grained, moist,
downward
Sandy Silt -olive-tan, some clay, dense
.. Silty Sand -tan, rust-mottled, fine-grained, clay interbed, moist,
dense
Silt -olive-light brown, some sand, moist, very dense
Silty Sand -med. Brown, well-sorted, fine-grained, moist
SS Split Spoon
lof2 GW-130
•
20
21
22 0
23
24 0
25
26 0
• 27
28 0
29
30 0
31
32
0
33
34
35
36 0
37
38 0
39
•
EnergySolutions
Groundwater Monitoring Well Boring Log
Stratigraphic Log
Silt -orangish-brown, some clay, moist, very dense
clayey near base
Clay -orangish-brown, moist, med, plasticity, stiff
Silty Clay -as above, color change to orange-mottled tan
ilty Clay -yellowish-gray, orange-and yellow-mottled,
intervals wet, moo, plasticity, stiff
Silt -yellowish-gray, orange-and yellow-mottled,
sand, moist
Silt and Sand, tan, interbedded clay, wet, dense
Silt -moo, gray, moist, dense
TD ofbonng -39,6 feet bgs
SS Split Spoon
20f2
4,258,06
16130
Sand
4,248.06
2"
Schedule
40 PVC
0,010-
inch
screen
GW-130
•
o
2
3
4
5
6 • 7
8
9
JO
II
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
•
EnergySolutiol1S
Groundwater Monitoring Well Boring Log
08118/09
By: Robert Sobocinski
irnlln{lw",tl>.r Elevation (ft amsl): 4,248.52
08119/09
2-inch LD.
Bentonite
Stratigraphic Log
Silt and Clay -tan, roots, dry, loose
0 Silty Clay -tan/light brown, dry, dense
Silty Clay -olive-tan, moist, med. plasticity, stiff
0
o Recovery
0 Clay -olive-gray with thin light gray interbeds, rust-mottled, moist,
med. plastic, stiff
0 Clay -predominantly olive-light gray, thinly-bedded, some silt,
alternating with olive-med. gray interbeds, moist,
med. plasticity, med. stiff
Silty Sand -tan, predominantly finelmed. grained, some coarse
sand and gravel, moist, med. dense
0 Clayey Sand -tan, interbedded with silty sand and clay, moist
0 Silty Sand· tan, fine-grained, some clay, moist, med. dense
0 10 silty clay interbed, yellowish-tan
0 70
Silty Sand· yellowish-tan, well-sorted fine sand, moist,
downward to more silt and very fine sand, dense at base
SS Split Spoon
1 of2 GW .. 131
•
20
0 60
21
0 35
22
23
0 25
24 0 15
25 0 25
26 0 15
• 27
28
0 60
29 0 10
30 0 IO
31
32 0 10
33
34
35
36 0 60
37
38
0 35
39
•
75
90
40
65
EnergySo/utiOltS
Groundwater Monitoring Well Boring Log
Stratigraphic Log
Silty Sand -same as above, but fining downward to greater
clay content
Clayey Silt -reddish-brown, moist, dense, fining downward
Silty Clay -reddish-brown, rust mottled, moist, med. plasticity,
stiff
Clayey Silt -reddish-brown, some sand, moist, dense
Clay -reddish-brown, moist, med. plasticity, stiff
clayey sand interbed, light-brown
Silty Clay -tan/gray, moist, stiff
Clay -olive-light gray, rust-and yellow-mottled, wet, med.
stiff
.. Silty Sand -tan, fine-grained, cemented, some clayey interbeds, wet
Clayey Silt -olive-tan, some sand, moist, very dense
SS Split Spoon
20f2
4,258.56
16/30
Sand
4,248.56
2"
Schedule
40 PVC
om!).
inch
screen
GW-131
EnergySo/utiol1s
Groundwater Monitoring Well Boring Log
08118/09 • cO {3c;--o '" c. ~ 'p 8 ~<2 ~ ~
0'-' > ... ~ ~ il3<2 '-'
2-inch LD.
2-inch l.D. Type
Grout
Stratigraphic Log
4.279.59
0 Silt with Clay -tan, dry, dense
same, color grades to light brown, slightly moist
same, color grades to reddish-brown 2" 2
0 30 Silty Clay -reddish brown to tan, med. plasticity, stiff
3
0 20
4 0 15 Clay -med. brown, rust-mottled, moist, med. plasticity, stiff
5
6 0 Silty Clay -tan-gray, rust-mottled, moist, med. plasticity, stiff
• 7 Aquaguanl
Grout
8 0 Clay -med. olive-gray with thin light olive-gray silty interbeds,
med. plastic, stiff
9
10 0 same, except light gray interbeds thicker than above
11
12 Sand -tan, predominantly fine-grained, with med.-and coarse-
sand and gravel near top, moist
13
14 0 Silty/Sandy Clay -tan, 1.5" poorly-sorted sand interbed present
15
16 0 65 Sand -tan, predominantly fine-grained, with med. and coarse
grained sand present, moist
17 0 40
Sandy Silt and Clay -interbedded, moist, dense
18
19 0 65 35 Silty Sand -yellowish-tan, fine-grained, well-sorted, moist, dense
• SS Split Spoon
1 of2 GW-132
•
EnergySolutions
Groundwater Monitoring Well Boring Log
o
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
II
12
13
14
15 5
16
10
17
18
19
20
Envirocare of Utah, LLC
Groundwater Monitoring Well Boring Log
Lithologic Log
or Processed Clay
Clay -gray to grayish brown, soft, damp to moist, some iron stain­
organic material.
-reddish-brown, fine-grained. dry, clean.
-Silty, light gray to gray, damp
-Light brown to tan, clayey and silty, with gravel.
,--....,,,",,n -Light reddish brown, fine-grained, damp
-Light brown to tan, clayey and silty, with gravel.
JiL~oIII\,-,,,a] -Brownish gray. damp, sandy with gravel.
-Fine-grained, some silt, tan, coarsens with depth.
~~!I~:'~~ -Tan, damp, firm.
-Tan, wet, some iron staining.
and -Light brown, very fine, damp, firm, some silt.
-Sandy, light gray, damp.
-Damp, fine-grained, lean, light gray.
firm.
CC Continuous Core Barrel
.2 -'E (.) :;. c2 <>~ w
lof2 P3-97NECR
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
Envirocare of Utah, LLC
Groundwater Monitoring Well Boring Log
4,248.84
Lithologic Log
Sand -Light brown to reddish brown, fine-grained. damp.
Clay -Light reddish-brown. damp. firm.
Clay -Sand lenses, gra}, damp, sofi.
Clay -Silty, reddish-brown, finn to very finn, damp.
Clay -Reddish-brown. damp.
Sandy clay to clayey sand -gray. finn to very finn.
Clay -Very moist, whitish.
Clay -Damp to moist. light gray, finn, some iron staining.
Clay -Light gray to white. wet to very wet with consolidated sand
and silt.
-Finn to very finn, light gray. damp.
40L--L-L~~~~~
TO of boring -40.0 feet bgs
CC Continuous Core Barrel
.2
;~ " ~
4,:53 46
16/30
Sand
4.:4846
E3_~ 2"
Schedule
40 PVC
0.010-
inch
Screen
4.:J8.46
20f2 P3-97NECR
•
•
•
LOCAL STRATIGRAPHY AND WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY
SITE: ENVIROCARE OF UTAH, SOUTH CLIVE
COORDINATES: SL8tI Sec. 32, T1S, R11W, N 2m.16, E 2573.7
(fro. SU corner)
DATE COMPLETED: 8-25-1981
SUPERVISED BY: DalleS and tIoore, Inc.
LOCAL
STRATIGRAPHY
AND
UELL SCREEN
PLACEJIIENT
Elevation of reference point *
Height of reference point
above ground surface
Depth of surface seal
UELL NO.: SC-1
AQUIFER: UpperllOst
4279.4
3.3 ft
Unknown
11 ft. Type of surface seal: GROUT (0-68 feet)
: 1 :
· .... . · ..... .
.. .. . . . · .....
........ .... .. .. ..
30 ft.
45 ft.
I.D. of surface casing
Type of surface casing: Sch. 80 PVC
Depth of surface casing
1.0. of riser pipe
Type of riser pipe: Sch. 40 PVC
Diaaeter of borehole
Type of fi ller: BEHTOHlTE, 68-73 ft.
Elev./depth of top of seal
Type of seal: CLAY, 73-100 ft •
Type of gravel pact: SAND
Elov./depth of top of gravel pact
Elevation depth of top of screen
Description of screen: 2--DIAftETER
Pack SLOTTED STAND PIPE
1.0. of screen section
Elev./depth of botte. of screen
Elev./depth of botte. of gravel pack
Elev./depth of botte. of pLugged
blank section
Type of filler below plugged section: IJHKNOVN
Elevation of botte. of borehole
4"
Unknown
2"
Unknown
4203.1
4176.1
4056,3
4046.3
4046.3
4046.3
WS.3
* All elevations are in feet above Ie8n sea level.
JOB NO. 2352 FIGURE 111-1
•
•
•
MONITORING WELL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION WORKSHEET
SC-l
I. Monitoring Well Des;;n
A. SC-1 was designed according to the information on the well construction su..ary sheet.
II. Drilling Methods
A. Method. The well was drilled (bored) using a truck-MOUnted rotary drill rig and either hollow­
atea auger or rotary-wash drilling .ethods.
B. Drilling Fluids. Unknown.
C. Fluids Analysis. Unknown.
D. EquipMent Cleaning. Unknown.
E. Ca.pressed Air. Unknown.
F. Potenti.ometric Surface. The potentiOllletric surfaces were documented on the boring logs. However,
the meaaureaent was made at a later date.
G. Formation Samples.
1. Collection of Semples. Core samples were collected at the depths identified on the boring
logs.
2. Sempl ing Methods. Unknown.
3. Collection Intervals. See boring log.
4. Chemical/Physical Tests. No chemical tests were performed on the samples. However, tests
were run to establish soil types and classifications.
III. Monitoring Well Construction Materials
A. Saturated Zone Primary Casing. The well is constructed with Schedule 40 PVC pipe.
B. Protective Casing. The well is protected with a 4"-diameter Schedule 80 PVC pipe. The screen
is a 2" dia .. ter slotted standpipe PVC screen.
D. Steam Cleaning. Unknown.
IV. Well Intake Design and Well Development
A. Screen. Slotted 2"-dia .. ter standpipe was installed as the screen.
B. Filter Pack. Chemically-inert sand filter pack was installed. It is unknown whether the well
has been .. asured for turbidity. No results are available.
C. Well Develop.ent. Unknown.
V. AnnuLar Space SeaLs, Aprons, Locks
A.
.. thod for
bentonite.
tallpering.
Well Seal. The well is sealed from the ground surface to 68 feet in depth with a grout aeal. The
grout installation is unknown. The well was filled from a depth of 68 feet to 73 feet with
The well was backfilled frOll 73 feet to 100 feet with clay. The well is locked to prevent
••
• ... ::: ..
•
!'DEIS -A~st t. 1982
eORING SC-I ~ra .'11"11.1
1O----:=irr11
ZS ISI'T'I
CWla..t
I.IGIn' T ..... III."'" CLAY '1'0 Q..\Y'C'Y III.T 6NO SOMC TN .. 111.,..., I"IftC _
",,"YII:ItS -IT1I"JI' '1'0 YVn' ","
"'---:aJiC"g;t;~(Ml.-""'C'I'O IoIUIIIIN SAHO WITM TItAC:It TO SOMC III.T _ CLAY -C::OCSC '1'0
WCIIUN_C
T"'" SlI.':'T CLAY TO CLAY'C'Y III.T
'1'0 JoC:IIIIN _ WITM '"
'1'0 $CMC III.T -""=-__ c
111.,..., CLAY TO CLAYC't -sr,,,,,.
III.,..., ~IOC TO "'Co~ .. SAHO
WITM ... TMCC Q..\Y -""""_ OOtSC
111.,..., I"IHC _ -In"
'---Gj,-"CIU WITM :CIt<a CJl' CI.IlY'C'Y
6NO S.I.,..., ...... C SAND
cuu.~M I"IHC'I'O "11:_ SAHO
WITM TAACC '1'0 _ .II.T -""_
OOdCTO OOdC
--' .... IAC;g! WITM SOMe "LT"UIItATlHO I.IGIn' ~y __ CLAYC't
'II.T "'ftD SAND LAYCltS TO J'
THlOC-n.M ........... TIOHII
GAADCS WTTH oc:.c:AllOMAl. CCAIISC
..... 0 TO I"A'tC GllAYa.
(CONTINUEO)
110----"""'1:'
I
111-----
so--...... ~ ...
IOS-----I!
I~----------p~~
II.-----.... ""'!;iiii'""'ll"""
~.
A-•• e o
cuu.oa 'MITM OClC:AllCOMl. """GUI...UI
TO II.I_HGlULAII c:A1IS1t ..... 0
TO ,.,.,C GAAVCI.
GAAOI:.1 WTTH _C".. """YItIIS
ell CCA"'C _ ~ ~. TO
'"TNICX
GMQC.S 'MITM '" """'I'D 0/11 c.ItA_ '_N _ TO MCDI __ WTTH
A TAACC ':"0 _ III.T TO •• TMICX
AT 'OI..rtrr
GllAcc:I IUCHTl..., c:DoOn"ItO WITM
':'ltIN .:A&.c::A"COUI "It_ AND
cc:::AllOtAl. IIU-..GU",,"" I"IHC
GIlAVCI. WITM COOOtfll:llSAHO
c::IATlHO AND TIIACC JI'''': 0_0
A ~D.:I WOlSTUlllt ItXI'Otcsno AI 6 ~AO'
0/11 ':'Hit 0,", WII:IGHT !;II' KII.
• DIn' 00dlT'r CXI"'ICSSCO IN US_ PCII ClIIIC
I"COT e II.OW. PCIII"CCIT CI' I"O<CTAATICIH ~_ '"
100 U. """'''''"11_,,_ :10 IftOoCS ,. ""'!CII ::SA",...C" W .... "'OY"NCC::I MYOIIMII.o-e.a.UoIC: II T'n't:S 0/11 SAM.....".
!P'I-"!STOlt SA"II'U:II
(lOTI -1"fT00CJI ....... II'U:II .:!IM, -IHa.rr SANII'U:II :s,..,,-",,,,,.0."-0 P'CoI:'f1U.TIOIt TEST
~1I-DA .. a. _It ..... II'U:II WITM
• U·,...,PC OIIIVC IHCC
~I-010 .. , •• _C SA"II'U:II wrn<
.. 0'''''''''' :;'''IYC I_
• OCJI"T'H AT _0< UHDlST\III.C SA"I'\.E ....
EXTIlAC"l'E:)
g "''''NDAIID "EHCTAATlOlt TEST
t<:m:!
'nC OISClSSlCH IN TIC 'tCT ",",DCII T1C SCC'T1CM nTU:o.
'Im: CIlHOITlClHI.Il.lIiSUIIJI'..cc·. IS NltCZ ...... Y TO A
I"OIOPCII UHDCIIST"'MDIJooG Oft T1C .... NIIC CJl' nc
.UII_JI'..cc _7'1:111"1..5.
LOG OF BORING
•
•
.. :
•
.
i
.\
?DEIS -AU€Ust. 1952
BORI NG SC -I CCONTINUED) CCONTINUED,
liS A.
::a 'N isf-I"" SM
1210
• JO lUI
IZ'
• 1'"0 lUI
I.l1O
.!IV.-
• lUI
::IIi:..
lao f[ ..... jIi.
.~.
1&1 :a 'iI' IVTl
':I .01 1~ltll'
ISI'TI .-
8 r.JO lUI
I~ , -y
so. .. l1\._ ........ TTVWTCO _
• .... I.OSICDI
OMIlClI WITH _, c:::.o.ltS, s.u.o
TOnNC~YG.
..... OES YItIn' DC:HM
-
OMDC:!I WITH CCCIo.1CoI41.. C1.A
nNC TO "CDIu .. s.u.o ._ I .' c..av uvca
OMOES WIT14 'r1lACl: c:::.o.ltSC _ TO nNC CAAYG.
GlllADIt, WITH ~ """ CAAYG.
AMO SOle Cl:»IISC ~\lc:J..
.....:;uUII .. T IH.O TO 1".0 ra;r
-
11O----------~1r,~~,.---------------------------
I" ---------!r.J~i;j
8 ZIG
IDI
=z:I-... ------__ II~~;1
':I I..,
CPTI a: Ul'--------I,ii;i':;!! IS
'.
us-----
III
~oc, wITH __ Q.A.CY "NC
TO"II:IIUIIO._
ca .. cc:. wITH,... ....... T'r "NC
....... OUV~ TO IloTMlClC
__ CClNf'U:TG AT :so •• n::r.
ON '-U-II
, INCH QA"£TP 'I..O'M'IO ...... "g ... pt;
,.1':tCIM£TP ~ .. u..cD TO W •• I"I_T
A "1:l..D _STU"C IOU'fIIDHO A, AI't:JIc:II:)otTAGC
fI' T>tI (lin' .IIG>4T 011 101 ..
• IIIt'f DOtStn' I:XPItU.CD ... !..lIS. PCIt 01_ -. C LOW' "" _ OIII'Dt£TIlATION UlNiA 1.10 .... MANNCII __ )lJ1I<CMU
,. ,., ... 10 /S4MPU:1I .A. A"""1<1:0 M'l'tlIU'M ICH~JCI o TVI"CS OI/f ..... jO\.JI;lI jJoo!-,._ ..... jO\.JI;II
II'T' -1'1T0IICl "'MjO\.JI;II
15"'-...a.rr ",NjO\.JI;4I 11"'-., .... 0 .... 0 ~TION TCST
IJI-04MC •• _C ..... jO\.JI;lt WITH
o U' TV"" 0lIl1'1'1 ....oc:
:1:11-04001S • _I ..... jO\.JI;JI "MITH
• 0' TV"" DAI\IC ,_
• DC"""""._ UNOISTU"HO SANjO\.JI; W ...
CXTllAC'TCO
:I """04A" ~TlCIN TI.ST
LOG OF BORING
Dames & Moor-e
•
•
•
PDEIS -A~~st. 1992
-::: ...
BORING SC-2 QCiIIIDIIIIAfU "enOl.O l zm.I.'
a..D&.-""tnt .c.c --...L._
ICIL.&a
G~au ""tnt _ cu..,_
.tnt n-c ........,. GU., 1..A~1tS
TO W"TMtOI
I'"" .. nll r..EV1I1."TILC nA:T ON >-_ IINI., wtnt lIOMC. ....,..,. III.TV TO cu.1Tr
~ "0 "'[lIIU .. _a -14_
~~
G~CIII:S ""tnt I..I:lIS cu." ZU"Io-II:II
ill: ZS------i::~WAl GU", TO .. III. TV TO cu.n:v
,..... TO IoCDIUM ....-wrno ..... T1:A­_TING I..A~ _ UCiHT GoIIIA.,
.ux.
CI....oI>nT IMI.T TO '"'TMICX I.IGWI' ~"CI __ '" I .. TV cu.., TO
CI....oI>nT III. T wM"M \tI'JMC TN .. III. TV
_I: ....-\Jo~ TO I" TMICX­
I4CIIU .. mnr --'C;''"'''IQ M..UIIIIN-COJU.., IL.CCIC"I' ~I:""O_~
CII::IoOEHT ... 'nQM
~., ._ ._ .. ,II.TV ",,,II: _ WrT'H
,"""C% TO _II: cu.., -_DIU" _I:
'---~~·011.., wrno::ooa _ C:OO~
1"-"' JI1IC TO Mll:DIU"""-TO
•• 'n1!ICIC ... ,. 4.' "In'
GAAat:3wrno 1oES1'''T
10_ CIIIooII'\.ZT'I;1I "1' So. 0 I");TT
I __ CIA~I:II I~O r: ... _~f'1t
"'lC:CINC'T U IHI'T'" u....I:Q TO .L • I"'IJ:':'
... -. Ie o
... ....a.JI ...::esrvltl: U""CS'1tO ...... I'I:Itc:DlT 101;11: COOTlOI: I>'n'_~ __ I.
• Don' ~ £lUI>ttCSS£J;I IN ...... 1"tJI OJ .. C:
""'" e ILCIw:I ~ ""'" or ~IUiT1Cll>4 us_ '" .... 1.8 .... """"'" ___ la_a
,. I'IISICO <SA~Jt ..... "'II'VAH;.II:D ~!.JC"t.I.J.,IC1 o TVI"D __ I'\.I:1II
11"1-~ ..... I'U:II
Cl"TI-I'n'OCJt ..... I"\..DI
ISMI-1INa.rt .... "'I'Ui:1t _",-..,. __ 0 1"OCTIII"T1_ TItIIT
UI-DAJoClI.IoQIIIIC ...... ~ ~ 'u'TI''''' DoIIWI: __
III-C/A.O>OCI • _C ...... 1'U:1I WfTM
• 0" Tl'1"It _YI: ...ac
• HPnt ... ,. _CIt \/MOIS'TVIt.l:tI "'MI'U: ....
I[XT ..... c:n:O c:a I'T _4tCI P'OfCTIII,A TlQH TII:n
LOG OF
BORING SC-3
80RINGS
~_"TOT"""""'''''''''O'l'TO cu."n .IL':' -MII:IIII./ .. 1'11'"
GoIIIAat:, WrT'H ~I '-LL _
OQ.LS .... 0 .. rT'H '"oCI"IU( cu..,
GllAOCI wrno.".... UI:JNT T ..... _
wwn: '''1' 1..A't'DII TO ..... " TNCK
.. ..0 "'L 1"UI/IoA. "I"INO wrno LICIOIT
IUIA" cu.'Y'CT IIILT I..A 'I'SII. TO
I" TNCX
._ .. "rT'H _ 111/..,. III.TV cu.., TO
c .. nn '11. T ....... .w&O wrT'H ..,"'" TO
ooc:.!:I ..... _0 I..A'I'VI' wlT14 T~c::I TO _ liLT ..... 0 I .. TV I'M TO
MII:_ "'000 \Jo 1'01' TO l'TWCl -
I'n" TO YCJtY 1'11'"
G~OCS UGHT GlIAl' , .. CQI,.OI!
W,", _ IfUfIT c;:::u:IOIl[tI :o-rs
UGHT QAII> .... _ .. 111.", TO cu.'Y'CT
,....; TO Ml:AUI'I _O·lI' .... ,.""'u..,
~I-...:DIUM _II
._ .. "'HI ':0 WltDlUl>l ... _ wrno ...
T'JIUi>CI: TO SC_ III.T -OCOI ..... _It
1I01I __ u:Tl:tlAT , .. , ~
OCI-Ii-1I ,_ DlAIIOC':'UIILQ'T":'CtI ST"MIl"''',
... !r..tC*I:n:,. U4T .. u....I:" TO 10.1 "".-,
__ WlI.I .,. .. o.o...t_
. ;
•
•
PD~IS -August, 1992
JlAJOR DIVISIONS
GlUVIL eLU ....
.... D h."""' , .
G".Y(u.y 't_U,
eo."S( SO'LS
'''.'11'0 SOILS
...... 1' .... . -''''''. -IlUIa&a __ .. .fIICWI.
" "qll
_ ............ ., .".,' .,
u.!.U.I. .......... "'" "'WI lin
... , III
c:.1141"(0
SOIU
-c ..... ..
:J# ., .... at, t.
1..lIotIo.Jo.U-­," ... .,.. .."
.....
_ ..... I.'
., a.... "M~ 1 ... _ ........ 1 " .. ~ .." -.......
..
SOIL CLASSll"ICATI0N
DESCRIPTIONS
...... "' ........... 1'\1. ... .... " • ..... •• , ..... , ....... rT\.. ,. -' ......
GP ...... , ................. 1.. , ••• ,,,.
........ """" ....... ,'1\.1 .. -"'WI. .. "", _-t .. L ......... ~ GM .... r ••• _ •
GC
S'N
SP
SU
SC
ML
CL
CM
CH
t,,~. ......... • ........ ........ c.... .."'.1 .
........ ... ,.. ....... , .... , ..... ,
.... ,. ....f'9\oC II _ , ..... .
. ...... , ......................... . ......... "j''''''' .... , ... .
..... a...c .... '. • .... ,., ", .. ....... .... "" ... " .... ry .. 'Q.."', .... ~ ....... ,' ... n .,.. l&.I_r ...... "tOft
......... c h,'''' __ ....... c.--,
~ ... """=,,.. .. •• ,,,'" ... " .. ......... an_ .... ,. , ..... , ••• , ...
Q. •••
.... ......: .. t ........ -c
~n CloAra .,..... ",",.Unc:tfY
....-....c c ... " • ., ... "' .. ,ncl".~ , ... , ......
.... -..c ct...... ... .... ". .,. ..."
.... A.ftCft. • .... _c .... ,.
... r. ___ ................. . PT .. .r. _ .... u._c "'."11.'"
CBAl'tT
UNIFIED SOIL CLASSlFICATION SYSTEM
~ __________ -i
•
•
•
"
LOCAL STRATIGRAPHY AND WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY
SITE: ENVIROCARE OF UTAH, SOUTH CLIVE
"ELL NO.: SC-2
COORDINATES: SLBK Sec. 32, T1S, R11", N 369.06, E 272.3
(frOil S" corner)
DATE COMPLETED: Unknown AQUIFER: Upper.ast
SUPERVISED BY: Da.es and Koore, Inc.
LOCAL
STRATIGRAPHY
AND
"ELL SCREEN
PLACEMENT
Elevation of reference point *
Height of reference point
above ground surface
Depth of surface leal
Type of lurface seal: GROUT (0-5.5 feet)
4276.6
4271.97
7.4 ft
2.8 ft
(1981 )
(1989)
(1981 )
(1989)
Unknown
I.D. of lurface caling 4-
Type of surface casing: Sch. 80 PVC
Depth of surface casing Unknown
I.D. of riser pipe 2-
Type of riser pipe: Sch. 40 PVC
Dia.eter of borehole
Type of filler: CLAY BACKFILL (5.5-16.0 ft.)
Elev./depth of top of leal
Type of leal: NONE
Type of gravel pack: SAND
Elev./depth of top of gravel pack
Elevation depth of top of Icreen
Description of Icreen: 2--DIAMETER
SLOTTED STAND PIPE
I.D. of screen lection
Elev./depth of bottOil of screen
Elev./depth of bottOil of gravel pack
ELev./depth of bottOil of plugged
blank section
Unknown
N/A
4253.2
4250.7
4220.7
4220.7
Unknown
l Type of filler below plugged lection: UNKNOWN
Screen
Elevation of bottOil of borehole 4219.2
* All elevationa are in feet above .ean aea level.
JOB NO. 2352 FIGURE 1II-2
•
•
•
MONITORING WELL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION WORKSHEET
SC-2
I. Konitoring Yell Deslgn
A. SC-2 was designed according to the information on the well construction suamary sheet.
II. Drilling "ethods
_ A. "ethod. The well was drilled (bored) using a truck-lOUnted rotary drill rig and either hollow-
stem auger or rotary-wash drilling-methods.
B. Drilling Fluids. Unknown.
C. fluids Analysis. Unknown.
D. Equipment Cleaning. Unknown.
E. Coapressed Air. Unknown.
F. Potentiometric Surface. The potentiometric surfaces were documented on the boring logs. However,
the measure~nt was Bade at a later date.
G. Formation Samples.
1. Collection of Samples. Core salllples were collected at the depths identified on the boring
logs.
2. Sampling "ethods. Unknown •
3. Collection Intervals. See boring log.
4. Chemical/Physical Tests. No chemical tests were performed on the samples. However, tests
were run to establish soil types and classifications.
III. Honitoring Yell Construction Haterials
A. Saturated Zone primary Casing. The well is constructed with Schedule 40 PVC pipe.
B. Protective Casing. The well is protected with a 4"-diameter Schedule 80 PVC pipe. The screen
1s a 2M dia.eter slotted standpipe PVC screen.
D. Steam Cleaning. Unknown.
IV. Yell Intake Design and Yell Development
A. Screen. Slotted 2"-diameter standpipe was installed as the screen.
B. Filter Pack. Chemically-inert sand filter pack was installed. It is unknown whether the well
has been .easured for turbidity. No results are available.
C. Yell Developaent. Unknown.
V. Annular Space Seals, Aprons, Locks
A. Yell Seal. The well is sealed from the ground surface to 5.5 feet in depth with a grout
seal. The aethod for grout installation is unknown. The well was filled from 5.5 feet in depth to 16 feet in
depth with clay backfill. The well has been fitted with a dedicated bladder pump •
•
•
•
LOCAL STRATIGRAPHY AND WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY
SlTE: ENVIROCARE OF UTAH, SOUTH CLIVE
WEll NO.: SC-3
COORDINATES: S~ Sec. 32, T1S, R11W, N 345.16, E 4981.00
(f rOIl SW corner)
DATE ~PlETED: 8-23-1981 AQUifER: Upper.o.t
.'
SUPERVISED BY: D .... and Moore, Inc.
LOCAL
STRATIGRAPHY
AND
WEll SCREEN
PLACE"ENT
--v.tLl
Screen
Elevation of reference point *
Height of refe~ce point
above ground surface
4280.5
3.2 ft
Depth of surface seal Unknown
Type of surface seal: GROUT (0-5.0 feet)
1.0. of surface casing 4·
Type of surface casing: Sch. 80 PVC
Depth of surface casing
1.0. of riser pipe
Type of riser pipe: Sch. 40 PVC
Di .. eter of borehole
Type of filler: CLAY BACKfILL (5.0-23.0 ft.)
Elev./depth of top of seal
Type of seal: NONE
Type of gravel pack: SAND
Elev./depth of top of gravel pack
Elevation depth of top of screen
Description of screen: 2M·DIAIIETER
SLOTTED STAND PIPE
I.D. of screen section
Elev ./depth 01 bottOil of acreen
Elev ./depth of bottOll of gravel pack
Elev./depth of bottOll of plugged
blank aection
. Type of filler below plugged section: UNKNOWN
Elevetion of bot tOIl of borehole
Unknown
Unknown
N/A
4254.3
4246.8
2"
4226.8
4226.8
4226.8
4226.8
* All elevations are in feet above ..an ... level.
JOB NO. 2352 FIGURE 111-3
•
•
•
MONITORING WELL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION WORKSHEET
SC-3
A. SC-3 was designed according to the ;nforlation on the well construction su ... ry sheet.
n. Drilling Hethods
A. Hethod. The well was drilled (bored) using a truck-mounted rotary drill rig and either hollow­
ate. auger or rotary-wash drilling ~ethods.
B. Drilling Fluids. Unknown.
C. Fluids Analysis. Unknown.
D. Equipment Cleaning. Unknown.
E. Ccepressed Air. Unknown.
F. Potentiolletric Surface. The potentiOlietric surfaces were docullented on the boring logs. However,
the measure.ent was lade at a later date.
G. Formation Samples.
1. Collection of Samples. Core samples were collected at the depths identified on the boring
logs.
2. Sampling Hethods. Unknown.
3. Collection Intervals. See boring log.
4. Che.ical/Physical Tests. No chemical tests were performed on the samples. However, tests
were run to establish soil types and classifications.
Ill. Honitoring Well Construction Haterials
A. Saturated Zone Primary Casing. The well is constructed with Schedule 40 PVC pipe.
B. Protective Casing. The well is protected with a 4"-diameter Schedule 80 PVC pipe. The screen
is a 2" dialleter slotted standpipe PVC screen.
D_ Steu Cleaning. Unknown.
IV. Well Intake Design and Well Development
A. Screen. Slotted 2H-dia.eter standpipe was installed as the screen.
B. Filter Pack. Che.ically-inert sand filter pack was installed. It is unknown whether the well
has been .easured for turbidity. NO results are available.
C. Well Development. Unknown.
V. Annular Space Seals, Aprons, Locks
A. WeLL Seal. The well is sealed frOll the ground surfa'ce to 5.0 feet in depth with a grout
seaL. The III!thod for grout installation ;. unknown. The weLL was filled fro. 5.0 feet in depth to 23 feet in
depth with clay backfill. The well hes been fitted with a dedicated bladder pump.
•
•
•
~DEIS -A~Jst. 1992
0 n.-. ..
~~7 • ,
n.-.rwl -ISM' C)
IPt"I
Q "
..
eORING SC-4 ~1'U .,S01 •. O
C uon.o
~ CO/OA., ~P4 s.woar
TO a,..."CY 'ILT -ICClu .. sn ...
• ~ -.a.D ... U_PQ I O'QQT
GAAY TO UOHT T_"_"~ • ""TV c...o Y TO CI..A"rn '11. T .. me TM ...
6AotO'r TO a.....,,,,, SlI.. T .... .,os TO
J' _a SOIC "&on """c_
L.&~ TO III'THIOC -lCDIu .. TO -..,,"'
GAACIINII wrnt SI&o n I'UoC TO
_D\UIO SMoG .... n~ IA'TO II'
THIOl
: ~------------~~jq
I
GAACIICS sn,.,. W1TH SOIC ~­
loTION .... 0 W me 5000C ItUST
~CD ZCIoC.S
WATLI!I.EVD.. AT l&.~ ~ ON __
-.. ""C TO /CIIIu ..... ..a WITH A
TlU-a TO SO"C SII. T -ICClU .. TO ygoy DOoSC
GAAOCS WrTM LaS 'II.T
~toQ c=M~D AT II.' I'1I4T
CHI-If-II
J \OIOt D ... o.ocrU .LCTTt.D ST"IOO"-c
~UOMr.U '''ST .. u..;::I ":'0 11.1 ~
.!ta.
A-•• e
D
A "D..D ~IIC c,,"cssco AS A ~A4C
Cf' "'C DIft' W~ 01' ~
• ;)orr DOtsrT'I' CII'OtOSCD .. Loa. I'CII QI-.c: -e IL.OWS ~ POOT 01' ~IUITION US....: A ' .. u. ""_" __ )0..0.0
, I'VSt<D "A .. P\.DII w,.. AOVAHCXD KYllIlAUUCA&.UCI
D nPCIOl'~
~,-_STtIOo 'A-.vI
7T'-1'1TOCII ..... ~
""'-~ "'-uII ~n'-ST_1tO ~TION nsr
UI-O&>CI. _, ..... ~II wrnt ·U· T"'Y"rE c.rw SHOe 111'-D&~' _C "'-":11 WITH • D' n-c DlUVC S>4CC
• ~AT~~II'CD''''''~w''" ~'D Q STA_IIO "'DoC'nU.TION nsr
LOG OF
BORING SC-5
O-----w----~__O .... _.--.... ----------__ ........ __ ....
-: ~ ------------i!!i::1!9 ...
::
&: XI------f~I'-" !
S5----~~
Q I' 15n'
11M'
Q •
IS""
AS---------~~~
• .... ,
5O---Jf;~1S?=j
2::.",""_ ,.
1:11
BORINGS
T .... TO GA,o., a..."CY TO ">oC
.1.':"-_STl ...
GIIA~ wITH _IICUS '_&.1..
I'-.,p
'1. TV a...Y TO CI.,I."rn SlI..T YAlIVeD WrTM TMIN .... -rP. t# UGWI' GIlA" "IoT _ .II.TV "'IC......a
.... 'B115 ~ III.' TO W" Tl<IQI -
IC:UU .. STI",
UON'T GllAYI __ "
TO T .... _..-n: ~NJ WIT>
SOMC INn' CII.OIICD 1000 GIIA __ " ""C TO "co", ..
_wrno TlUlClETO_ "1..':" .,,0
YAII"';D WITH "' .... _ 'ILT ':"0
SAtf(1'f CI.,I.., .... 'rVtS TO W' TMIQI -
>e:Ia.I .. DOcIe TO DOcIe
WATlUI a.zvn. AT :e. I rUT ON >-_
GIIA~ WITH NO a...." AftCI L..DS
'LT
~ IUII_" '11.-:-' c.A'" ~O
CI.,I. ... "" .II.T YAIIVI:D .. rno ":'lOIN Sfl..:
nNC __ .... nllS TO IIA' TM'OI -
>CD., .. sn", TO sn ...
G .... DC:I ·.ITH SOMe I'1OOC 'A..c!
GRADO wITH _C ""C SAIOO -.-.. ~-
.-.. I'1MII: TO >CON .. _ wIT>< A
TlUlCIE TO IICIC "I..T -.., .. ..a ~AT II.J ~
ClMI-II-1i
II'lOt D&AIIIC'TP SI.O"'n'£;:) sa ... ,..c~ .. \.
"CCIotCTICI \IOSTA~ TO II.J 'U
•
•
PD~IS -August, 198%
MAJOR DIVISIONS
___ M'
", _" ..... U
U!SU. ..... ... _ .. "" tI"
'III~
GIIAINI:O
SOILS
IIIMC ...... ..
#II "'ca,6\. ft
I.I..tJ.I.U -... 'M ....... ..,.
'0\lil0
.ucO
UNOT
SOIU
a.. UN s.u.0 .... nu _ .. ......
---la, $.I..IoO.S WITM '-'u ., ce_
"" tu,.&I.M. ..... -
\0....... .. ... ,
...w t ••• "
v." •• " .• .,
ltI.!!l.S ho.. to
HlGK.T OIlGAllr(; SOIL'
SOIl. CLASSIFICATION
G'N
GP
GM
GC
S'N
SP
SC
ML
CL
OL
PT
CHA.RT
DESCRIPTIONS
.a. ........ ' •• c\... ... ..... . ..... _atw, ... "'1'\. ,. .......
... ~,· .... c ................. ,,,.
,... ............ ""rf\..l •• .. " .. .
Mr." ""«"s. ......... -.......
... , ... '~I
c"'...... ... .. 1\.'.. • ... ,,, ........ a..., _.f\J.C' .. "... ...... ,..... , .... " .. , ,...1. ".f"\,1 .... I .... '
# .. ~,.. ...... ....... • ••• e""" ....... ...f?\,' •• .. #, ....
-':"9 ..... , ................ ~.
..... ~ .... " .... '1' ,,_ ...... loe_ ~~. "", ... a..."CY ".... ~ .. a. ••• ' ""n ..,.... .... _, .,.. .... 'lOn
, .......... c "'.... til ..... ,.. a.-"'" ~.I~n ......... "" c:t. ... ~ ......... ca...... I.",. ct. .... , •• \.1 •• ......
.... ...c """" ....... ..c .... n ~ .... ,. .... ""*Ina,.
" __ ,,.,e .... '... ..c_c.,..,.. ••
.... ,kotCCIfN. ".... .... .••
"""'"' ... u
.~ c" •• , ... -_ ....... n<,". t.t a..',
......c .".,. .,. .. "". '. ....
", •• ftcn •• eu_c ..... ,.
fiCA' ...................... . M'. ... .au •. c n*',.'.
UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
•
•
•
UOll(HNo(Al (ON\UllAN'~ IN(
LOCAL STRATIGRAPHY AND WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY
SITE: ENVIROCARE OF UTAH, SOUTH CLIVE
WELL NO.: SC-4
COORDINATES: SLBH Sec. 32, ns, R11\1, N 5105.06, E 5083.8
(frOil S\I comer)
DATE COKPLETED: 8-29-1981 AQUIfER: UpperllOst
SUPERVISED BY: Da~s and Hoare, Inc.
LOCAL
STRATIGRAPHY
AND
\lELL SCREEN
PLACEMENT
Elevation of reference point *
Height of reference point
above ground surface
Depth of surface seal
Type of surface seal: GROUT (0-4.0 feet)
1.0. of surface casing
Type of surface casing: Sch. 80 PVC
Depth of surface casing
1.0. of riser pipe
Type of riser pipe: Sch. 40 PVC
Dia.eter of borehole
Type of filler: CLAY BACKFILL (4.0-29.5 ft.)
Elev./depth of top of seal
Type of seal: HOME
Type of gravel paclc: SAND
Elev./depth of top of gravel paclc
Elevation depth of top of screen
Description of screen: 2M-DIAMETER
Pack SLOTTED STAND PIPE
1.0. of screen section
Elev./depth of bottOil of screen
Elev./depth of bottOll of gravel paclc
Elev./depth of bottOil of plugged
blank section
Type of fi Uer below plugged section: UNKNOWN
4284.8
4.1 ft
Unknown
Unknown
2"
Unknown
4251.2
4249.2
4229.2
4229.2
4229.2
--1I.~ll
Screen
Elevation of bottOil of borehole 4229.2
* All elevations are in feet above ..an aea level.
JOB NO. 2352 FIGURE 111-4
•
•
•
1.
MONITORING WELL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION WORKSHEET
SC-4
A. SC-4 was designed according to the inforaation on the weLL construction sumaary sheet.
A. Method. The weLL was driLLed (bored) using a truck-mounted rotary driLL rig and either hoLLow­
stem auger or rotary-wash driLLing methods.
B. DriLLing FLuids. Unknown.
C. FLuids AnaLysis. Unknown.
D. Equipment CLeaning. Unknown.
E. Compressed Air. unknown.
F. Potentiometric Surface. The potentiometric surfaces were documented on the boring Logs. However,
the measure.ent was aade at a Later date.
G. Foraation SampLes.
1. CoLLection of SampLes. Core sampLes were coLLected at the depths identified on the boring
Logs.
2. SampLing Methods. Unknown .
3. CoLLection IntervaLs. See boring Log.
4. ChemicaL/PhysicaL Tests. No chemicaL tests were performed on the sampLes. However, tests
were run to estabLish soiL types and cLassifications.
Ill. Monitoring WeLL Construction MateriaLs
A. Saturated Zone Priaary Casing. The weLL is constructed with ScheduLe 40 PVC pipe.
B. Protective Casing. The weLL is protected with a 4"-diameter ScheduLe 80 PVC pipe. The screen
is • 2M di ... ter sLotted st.ndp1~ PVC screen.
D. Steam CLeaning. Unknown.
IV. WeLL Intake Design and WeLL DeveLop.ent
A. Screen. SLotted 2"-diameter standpipe was instaLLed as the screen.
B. FiLter Pack. ChemicaLLy-inert sand fiLter pack was instaLLed. It is unknown whether the weLL
has been .easured for turbidity. No resuLts are avaiLabLe.
C. WeLL DeveLopment. Unknown.
V. AnnuLar Space SeaLs, Aprons, Locks
A. WeLL SeaL. The weLL is seaLed from the ground surface to 4.0 feet in depth with a grout
seaL. The .. thod for grout instaLLation is unknown. The weLL was fiLLed from 4.0 feet in depth to 29.5 feet
in depth with cLay b.ckf1LL. The weLL is Locked to prevent tampering •
•
•
•
CotOIl(HNICAl (ON\UlIANU IN(
LOCAL STRATIGRAPHY AND WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY
SITE: ENVIROCARE OF UTAH, SOUTH CLIVE
"ELL NO.: SC-5
COORDINATES: SL.BI1 Sec. 32, "S, R1111, N 5090.96, E 236.30
(froll S" corner)
DATE COMPLETED: 8-31-1981 AQUIFER: UpperllOst
SUPERVISED BY: De.es end Koore, Inc.
LOCAL
STRATIGRAPHY
AND
"ELL SCREEN
PLACE"ENT
1 •• _ ...... Peclt
--"'.Il
Screen
Elevetion of reference point *
Height of reference point
ebove ground surfece
Depth of surfece seel
Type of surfece seal: GROUT (0-4.0 feet)
4276.3
2.8 ft
Unknown
I.D. of surfece c:esing 4"
Type of surfece c:esing: Sch. 80 PVC
Depth of surfece c:esing Unknown
I.D. of riser pipe 2"
Type of riser pipe: Sc:h. 40 PVC
Die.eter of borehole
Type of filler: CLAY BACKFILL (4.0-29.0 ft.)
Elev./depth of top of seal
Type of sea l: NONE
Type of grevel paclt: SAND
Elev./depth of top of grevel peck
Elevetion depth of top of screen
Description 01 screen: 2"-DIANETER
SLOTTED STAND PIPE
1.0. of screen section
Elev./depth of botta. of screen
Elev./depth of botta. of gravel pack
Elev./depth of botta. of plugged
blank section
Type of fi Her below plugged section: UNKNOWN
Elevation of botta. of borehole
Unknown
N/A
4244.5
4242.0
2"
4222.0
4222.0
4222.0
4222.0
* All elevetions are in feet above .een see level.
JOB NO. 2352 FIGURE 111-5
•
•
•
MONITORING WELL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION WORKSHEET
SC-S
I. ~itoring Well Design
A. SC-5 was designed according to the information on the well construction summary sheet.
II. Drilling "ethods
A. "ethod. The well was ~rilled (bored) using a truck-.ounted rotary drill rig and either hollow­
stem auger or rotary-wash drilling methods.
B. Drilling Fluids. Unknown.
C. Fluids Analysis. Unknown.
D. Equipaent Cleaning. Unknown.
E. Caapressed Air. Unknown.
F. Potentiometric Surface. The potentiometric surfaces were documented on the boring logs. However,
the measurement was made at a later date.
G. Formation Samples.
1. Collection of Samples. Core samples were collected at the depths identified on the boring
logs.
2. Sampling "ethods. Unknown •
3. Collection Intervals. See boring log.
4. Chemical/Physical Tests. No chemical tests were performed on the samples. However, tests
were run to establish soil types and classifications.
III. ~itoring Well Construction "aterials
A. Saturated Zone Primary Casing. The well is constructed with Schedule 40 PVC pipe.
B. Protective Casing. The well is protected with a 4M-diameter Schedule 80 PVC pipe. The screen
is a 2M diameter slotted standpipe PVC screen.
D. Steam Cleaning. Unknown.
IV. Well Intake Design and Well Develop.ent
A. Screen. Slotted 2"-diameter standpipe was installed as the screen.
B. Filter Pack. Chemically-inert sand filter pack was installed. It is unknown whether the well
has been .easured for turbidity. No results are available.
C. Well Devel~ent. Unknown.
v. Annular Space Seals, Aprons, Locks
A. Well Seal. The well is sealed fro. the ground surface to 4.0 feet in depth with a grout
seal. The lethod for grout installation is unknown. The well was filled fro. 4.0 feet in depth to 29 feet in
depth with clay backfill. The well is locked to prevent tampering •
•
•
•
.. ... .. ..
II I I""
··' .... "1 • ISM!
II~I/l I 1»11
I""
r.J U CS"1 . ,..:.
.IHI) SC· MI..
'---C_.OI:.lIITO UGHT GUY _ W","" UQNTT-n .. _ .....ar
SILT ""TellS TO ..... TWtCIt
---G<II.AI)DWn'H ~TO"'~
A TEJ:I SCII. Zc»c TO ,. nt_ • __ Y l'lHC TO 1oOCtCaIW.-
Wn'H A T ..... CS TO IICMC .. LT _
IMTVIKI:CCD cu.V'IV SLT _ l'lHC
TO ..cDIUW __ a UTeIIS TO ).
ntICX .. DOoIC
GIIAOCS TO ""iliUM CIOdI _ w"'"" L.lSS lILT _ cu.Y
I ZS ___ 2 __ !~J!£~~--f WATDI \..I:VU,. AT %I. J"-ET ON _
o
I.IGHI" Cllta:HISM-GAAy SILT'!' cu.y TO
cu.Yn .. I.T W","" sa...: .. !HIt ... ..a
-." .....
GJU.OCS wme SCMI: UCOH1' CIItA Y
SILTY """ _ U'I'DS TO ,.
T'HICX
IIOItII<G COIot~ AT N.' "-ET
0101-11-11 I.' IIOCIf 1I .... /IoOCTU SI.DTT'Cl) lIT .... ..aM,.,;
... ~ ~Au..o:I TO oa.OI"'UT
A I"ICUI ~C ~CRIC'D'" A ~AGC
CI' nc MY WI:IOHT Of' ~
• MY OOI$IT'IIE.P!lCSSCD .. UII. I'1tJI ClJetC
f1OI:Tr
C a.ors"" f1OI:Tr Of' Pt:MCT1IA~ US_ A WIIU. "",_It ~.1IC)tCS
,. I'UlACI:I ~W ... AOY""'CZ'O~ a T'l?QCI'~ CI"I-I'InCIN~
1:1"1')-rm::'ICII ~
ClHI-ItC1..rf IAW\.UI
C51'T'1-1T~ 1"CIC'I"IIA11CM nsT
.. "-&\otoloC3 • _I ..... l1'\.£li wrnc • V' TTP'C IIIlfVC __
111-DAIoCS • _ ......... I'I.DI wrnt • o· T'!''''; ~ __
• DID"TM AT _ UHCIISlVft1JCD ... .........: W ....
C~
II ITAooOtoaa Il'DCTIIATIQf TEST
..
BORING SC-7
_ .. IILTY cu.\' TO cu.YCY III .. ::
wme sowc l'lHC ... ..a -~
QAAaa .... TY 1M "'_ I.' TO
l..' nn
'---G.llAl:IU w","" A IoC)IST TO ... ~ :c.oc AT '.1 nET
'---G.UI~U wrnc _C UCIOfT GUY
TO T,,",-..rTC 'ILTY I"IHIt
... ..a_.ILTU'I"CltSTO ,.
TNlCX 1C'---T:::1~iJ]lsi:i:'~ '---C_.OI:Sw",""", TIIACS .... I.T CXYITAU ..... a OCCA-'-IIUlI'T c:::M.CJICII YI:_
\.I_ .... SO'-GoIIAY " .. C TO wc:.uw ..... a
Wn'H A TAACS TQ so...: liLT .. ..0
IHTDlICDOC.D cu.YCY SILT _a"...,
Ta ooCDlU" SA..o UYl:1tS TO I'
TltICX -"CI)IU" CIOdC
: ~--------P.i~~ ...
:a ,.
• IS?1'1 I';:;.:~_""
WAnlt u;vn.AT II.II"'UTON __
G",",OU TO DAlllltD GUY
UCOH1' G!tCDo_Y ILT'!' c:.,.o.y TQ
cu. V'IV SILT .. me SOMe ".... 1I1.':'Y I"IHIt __ .,LT UYIII' TO ,.
TMCX-." ....
'----GoIlAllCWn'H _c ""IIITIAUoY
CVOOITC _I.~
ClltADU TO lIoICDIUM .",..
ClltAOO wrnc LUI cu.Y"­..."., .. I.T ..... O "'"C _ •
IIOItII'G ~tD AT U.I ~
C)jN 1-17-a
'.I'HOt ""'OOCTUI SI..t:71":'ZP lIT .0..0"'11"&:
Me_no ..sT ... u..t;) TO U.I nn
LOG OF. BORINGS
Dames & Moore
•
•
•
FD~IS -August. 198Z
MAJOR
IIIM'C ...... M'"
)I .. ", ...... . 1..II.l.I.I..LI--1M W,", WI
SIl.1'S
.NO
,"_US
SILTS
...HO
cun
DIVISIONS
\0 ......... ,
~ f .... ..
\,'1l1li" \.Ja.'
\.!.L!.!:U """ M
son:. CLASSIl"ICATION
ITYPfC.JL DESCRIPTIONS
G'N
G?
-n.", • ...... I •• a.,. ... ... '" .. ...... ...t ......... ",'Y\' ,. .... ''''"
... ~, ............... "'J.. .e .. ,,,.
...... ..n.ca.. w'''''' ••
... ft. ...
.... " M.C",,,, .................. GM ... , .... _.
GC c ... ~. • .... c.... • ........ ....... ca.... ...1\18' •
S'N • h,,, ·' •• 1" ........ • ........ .
....... ",.F'f'\' •• _ , .... .
SP '''''' ......... . ................. ,
........ ",.,,,,,,, •• .. "·-ci
SM .... ~ '''''.. _ ..... , ........
SC ~ •• C. .. .......... C\. .... 'fIIoOC'
"'I.
CI.
01.
MH
CH
CH
PT
CBAl't'1'
.... ...c ..... ' ...... c.y ".. , ..... aM_ ""...,.. "",r ...
Q. ... c .............. Q. ... ,. ",,,,n ..,... ..... , "" .... 'ta"
....... c ,....... ., \,. •• ,. _,-..
~ ... ~,.. ".1f."',,' ........ ... ............ ". I ... ,. , ........ \., •• Q. .. , •
... .....c ",r ......... ...
..... n a...a" ,f' \... ... •• rtCIT.
... ,~cow. I.... ...... ,I. -" .......
.......... C ... ., • ., ... ....... nc.,... I.' Q. ....
..... -c C", •••• ., .... .,. f ......
""''''"C"' ........ C II'Lf'
'-';"' ...................... ""
.. r_ .... • ....... , her,.f,
UNIFIED SOIl.. CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
--------
•
•
•
MONITORING WELL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION WORKSHEET
SC-6
I. Konitoring Well Design
A. SC-6 was designed according to the infor.ation on the well construction summary sheet.
11. Drilling Methads
A. Method. The well was~rilled (bored) using a truck-aounted rotary drill rig and either hollow­
st~ auger or rotary-wash drilling .ethods.
B. Drilling Fluids. Unknown.
C. Fluids Analysis. unknown.
D. Equipaent Cleaning. Unknown.
E. Co.pres.ed Air. Unknown.
F. Potentio.etric Surface. The potentiometric surfaces were documented on the boring logs. However,
the ~sure.ent was .ade at a later date.
G. For.ation Samples.
1. Collection of S"ples. Core samples were collected at the depths identified on the boring
logs.
2. Sampling Methods. Unknown •
3. Collection Intervals. See boring log.
4. CheMical/Physical Tests. No chemical tests were performed on the samples. However, tests
were run to establish soil types and classifications.
III. Konitoring Well Construction Katerials
A. saturated Zone Pri.ary Casing. The well ;s constructed with Schedule 40 PVC p;pe.
B. Protective Casing. The well is protected with II 4"-diueter Schedule 80 PVC pipe. The screen
is a 1.5u·di ... ter, slotted-standpipe pvc screen.
D. Ste .. Cleaning. Unknown.
IV. Well Intake Design and Well Developaent
A. Screen. Slotted 1.5"-dla.eter standpipe was installed as the screen.
B. Filter Pack. Che.ieally-inert sand filter pack was installed. It is unknown whether the well
has been ~sured for turbidity. No results are available.
C. lIell Developllent. Unknown.
V. Annular Space Seals, Aprons, Locks
A. Well Seal. The well ;5 sealed fro. the ground surface to 5.0 feet in depth with a grout
seal. The _thod for grout installation is unknown. The well was filled fro. 5.0 feet in depth to 3D feet in
depth with clay backfill. The well is locked to prevent ta~ring •
•
•
•
..
LOCAL STRATIGRAPHY AND WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY
SITE: ENVIROCARE OF UTAH, SOUTH CLIVE
WELL NO.: 5C-6
COORDINATES: SUIII Sec. 32, T1S, R1UI, N 3648.96, E 221.20
(frOil SII corner)
AQUIFER: Upperaost
SUPERVISED BY: Da ... and Moore, Inc.
LOCAL
STRATIGRAPHY
AHD
WELL SCREEN
PLACE"ENT
Elevation of reference point *
Height of reference point
above ground .urface
Depth of surface seal
Type of surface seal: GROUT (0-5.0 feet)
1.0. of surface casing
Type of surface casing: Sc:h. 80 PVC
Depth of surface casing
1.0. of riser pipe
Type of riser pipe: 5ch. 40 PVC
D1aaeter of borehole
Type of filler: CLAY BACKFILL (5.0-30.0 ft.>
Elev./depth of top of seal
Type of seel: NONE
Type of gravel pack: SAND
Elev./depth of top of gravel pack
Elevation depth of top of screen
Description of screen: 1.S"-DIAMETER
Pack SLOTTED STAHD PIPE
I...--U.IL
Screen
1.0. of screen aection
Elev./depth of botta. of acreen
Elev./depth of botta. of gravel pack
Elev./depth of botta. of plugged
blank aection
Type of fi Uer below plugged aection: UHICNOWN
'276.5
3.9 ft
Unknown
, ..
Unknown
1.5"
Unknown
N/A
42'2.6
4242 .6
1.5-
4227.6
4226.6
4227 .6
Elevation of botta. of borehole§226.6
* AU elevations are in feet above Man aee level •
JOB NO. 2352 FIGURE 111-6
•
•
•
UOll(H .. ""( CQN\UU" .. ,\ INC
LOCAL STRATIGRAPHY AND WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY
SITE: ENVIROCARE OF UTAH, SOUTH CLIVE
WEll NO.: SC-7
COORDINATES: Sl8K Sec. 32, T1S, R11W, N 2243.06, E 225.70
(froll SW corner)
AQUIFER: UpperllOst
SUPERVISED BY: Da.es and Koore, _Inc.
LOCAL
STRATIGRAPHY
AND
"Ell SCREEN
PLACEHENT
(This well was
not found in
1989. Three
wells were
installed in
1982 for a
pullPing teat.)
r -.-",,~.u ft.
Pack
JOB NO. 2352
Elevation of reference point
Height of reference point
above ground surface
Depth of aurface aeal
Type of aurface aeal: GROUT (0-5.0 feet)
1.0. of aurface caaing
Type of surface casing: Unknown
Depth of surface casing
1.0. of riser pipe
Type of riser pipe: Unknown
Dta .. ter of borehole
Type of filler: CLAY BACKFILL (5.0-10.0 ft.)
Elev./depth of top Of seal
Type of leal: GROUT (10.0-31.0 ft.)
BENTONITE (31.0-32.0 ft.)
Type of gravel pack: SAND
Elev./depth of top of gravel pack
Elevation depth of top of screen
Description of screen: Unknown
1.0. of screen section
Elev./depth of botto. of screen
Elev./depth of botto. of gravel pack
Elev./depth of bottOil of plugged
bl.anJc section
Type of fi Uer below plugged aection: UNKNOWN
Elevation of botto. of borehole
Not Surveyed
3.80 ft
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
6.0"
Unk!'!9WD
N/A
32.0 ft.
41.0 ft.
Unknown
56.0 ft.
56.0 ft.
56.0 ft.
Unknown
FIGURE 111-7
•
•
•
MONITORING WELL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION WORKSHEET
SC-7
I. Monitoring Well Deslgn
A. SC-7 was designed according to the inforaation on the well construction lu..ary sheet.
11. Drilling "ethods
A. "ethod. The well wes arilled (bored) using a truck-mounted rotary drill rig and either hollow­
ste. auger or rotary-wash drilling methods.
B. Drilling fluids. Unknown.
C. Fluids Analysis. Unknown.
D. Equipaent Cleaning. Unknown.
E. Compressed Air. Unknown.
F. Potentiometric Surface. The potentiometric surfaces were documented on the boring logs. However,
the .easure.ent was aade at a later date.
G. FOl"II8tion Samples.
1. Collection of Samples. Core samples were collected at the depths identified on the boring
logs.
2. Sampling "ethods. Unknown.
3. Collection Intervals. See boring log.
4. Chemical/Physical Tests. No chemical tests were performed on the samples. However, tests
were run to establish soil types and classifications.
Ill. Monitoring Well Construction ftaterials
A. Saturated Zone Pri .. ry Casing. The well is constructed with Schedule 40 PVC pipe.
B. Protective Casing. The well is protected with a 4"-diameter Schedule 80 PVC pipe. The screen
is a 1.5M-diameter, slotted-standpipe PVC screen.
D. Steam Cleaning. Unknown.
IV. Well Intake Design and Well Development
A. Screen. Slotted 1.5"-diameter standpipe was installed as the screen.
B. Filter Pack. Chemically-inert sand filter pack was installed. It is unknown whether the well
has been .easured for turbidity. No results are available.
C. Well Developaent. Unknown.
V. Annular Space Seals, Aprons, Locks
A. Well Seal. The well is sealed from the ground surface to 5.0 feet in depth with a grout
seal. The aethad for grout installation is unknown. The well was filled from S.D feet in depth to 10.0 feet
in depth with clay backfill.
•
•
•
•
LOCAL STRATIGRAPHY AND WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY
SITE: EHVIROCARE OF UTAH, SOUTH CLIVE
YELL NO.: SC-7A
COORDINATES: S~ Sec. 32, T1S, R11Y, N 2243.06, E 225.70
(fra SY corner)
DATE COMPLETED: 2-17-1982 AQUIFER: Upper.ast
SUPERVISED BY: Daaes and Moore, Inc.
LOCAL
STRATIGRAPHY
AND
YELL SCREEN
PLACEMENT
(This well wea
not f04.lnd in
1989. Three
wells were
installed in
1982 for a
pullping test.)
---U, .. ll
Screen
Elevation of reference point *
Height of reference point
above ground aurface
Depth of surface seal
Type of surface seal: GROUT (0·5.0 feet)
1.0. of aurface casing
Type of aurface casing: Unknown
Depth of surface casing
1.0. of riser pipe
Type of riser pipe: Unknown
Diaaeter of borehole
Type of filler: CLAY BACKFILL (5.0-28.0 ft.)
Elev./depth of top of seal
Type of seal: NONE
Type of gravel pack: SAND
Elev./depth of top of gravel pact
Elevation depth of top of screen
Description of screen: 1.S··DIAHETER
SLOnED STAND PIPE
1.0. of screen s.ction
Elev./depth of botta of screen
Elev./depth of bottOil of gravel pact
Elev./depth of bottOil of plugged
blant section
Type of f; ller below plugged section: UNICNOWH
Elevat;on of bottOil of borehole
1.274.7
4.6 ft
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
1.5-
Unknown
NIA
1.21.2.1
1.241.6
4226.6
4226.6
4226.6
4226.6
* All elevation. are in feet above IIHn ... level •
JOB NO. 2352 FIGURE III-B
•
•
•
MONITORING WELL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION WORKSHEET
SC-7A
1. Monitoring Well Design
A. SC-7A was designed according to the information on the well construction su..ary sheet.
II. Drilling Methods
A. Method. The well was drilled (bored) using a truck-mounted rotary drill rig and either hollow­
ste. auger or rotary-wash drilling ~thods.
B. Drilling Fluids. Unknown.
C. Fluids Analysis. Unknown.
D. Equipment Cleaning. Unknown.
E. Co.pressed Air. Unknown.
F. Potentiometric Surface. The potentio~tric surfaces were documented on the boring logs. However,
the ~asure.ent was made at a later date.
G. Formation Sa.ples.
,. Collection of Sa.ples. Core sa.ples were collected at the depths identified on the boring
logs.
2. Salllpl ing Methods. Unknown •
3. Collection Intervals. See boring log.
4. Chemical/Physical Tests. No cheaical tests were perfor~ on the samples. However, test~
were run to establish soil types and classifications.
III. Monitoring Well Construction Materials
A. Saturated Zone Primary Casing. The well is constructed with Schedule 40 PVC pipe.
B. Protective casing. The well is protected with a 4"-diameter Schedule 80 PVC pipe. The screen
is a '.5"-d1a~ter, slotted-standpipe PVC screen.
D. Stea. Cleaning. Unknown.
IV. Well Intake Design and Well Devel~nt
A. Screen. Slotted '.Sh-dia~ter standpipe was installed as the screen.
B. Filter Pack. Che.ically-inert sand filter pack was installed. It is unknown whether the well
has been .easured for turbidity. No results are available.
C. Well Development. unknown.
V. Annular Space Seals, Aprons, Locks
A. Well Seal. The well is sealed from the ground surface to 5.0 feet in depth with a grout
seal. The .ethod for grout installation is unknown. The well was filled from 5.0 feet in depth to 3D feet in
depth with clay backfill.
•
•
•
LOCAL STRATIGRAPHY AND WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY
SITE: EHVIROCARE OF UTAH, SOUTH CLIVE
YELL NO.: SC-7B
COORDINATES: S~ Sec. 32, T1S, R11Y, N 2243.06, E 225.70
(fro. SY corner)
DATE COttPLETED: 2-17-1982 AQUIFER: Upper.,st
SUPERVISED BY: Da.es and Koore,.Inc.
LOCAL
STRATIGRAPHY
AND
YELL SCREEN
PLACE"ENT
(Thb well was
not found in
1989. Three
we lls were
installed in
1982 for a
pullping test.)
* ~oC! ... vI Pack
Screen
JOB NO. 2352
Elevation of reference point
Height of reference point
above ground surface
Depth of surface seal
Type of aurface seal: GROUT (0·5.0 feet)
Hot Surveyed
3.00 ft
Unknown
I.D. of surface casing Unknown
Type of surface casing: Unknown
Depth of surface casing Unknown
I.D. of riser pipe
Type of riser pipe: Unknown
Diaaeter of borehole
Type of filler: CLAY BACKFILL (5.0-17.0 ft.)
Elev./depth of top of seal
Type of seal: GROUT (17.0-37.0 ft.)
BENTONITE (37.0-38.0 ft.)
Type of gravel pack: SAND
Elev./depth of top of gravel pack
Elevation depth of top of screen
Description of screen: Unknown
I.D. of screen section
Elev./depth of botta. of screen
Elev./depth of botta. of gravel pack
Elev./depth of botta. of plugged
blank section
Type of filler below plugged section: UHKNOIIN
Elevation of botta. of borehole
1.5·
Unknown
N/A
38.0 ft.
46.0 ft.
Unknown
55.0 ft.
55.0 ft.
55.0 ft.
Unknown
FIGURE III-9
•
•
•
MONITORING WELL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION WORKSHEET
SC-7B
I. Konitoring Well Design
A. SC-7B was designed according to the information on the well construction summary sheet.
II. Drilling ftethods
A. ftethod. The well was drilled (bored) using a truck-DOunted rotary drill rig and either hollow­
steM auger or rotary-wash drilling .ethods.
B. Drilling Fluids. Unknown.
C. Fluids Analysis. Unknown.
D. Equipaent Cleaning. Unknown.
E. Co.pressed Air. Unknown.
F. Potentio.etric Surface. The potentiometric surfaces were documented on the boring logs. However I
the aeasure.ent was aade at a later date.
G. Formation Samples.
1. Collection of Samples. Core samples were collected at the depths identified on the boring
logs •
2. Sampling ftethods. Unknown.
3. Collection Intervals. See boring log.
4. Chemical/Physical Testl. No chemical tests were perfor.ed on the samples. However, testJ
were run to establish soil types and classifications.
III. Konitoring Well Construction Materials
A. saturated Zone Primary Casing. The well is constructed with Schedule 40 PVC pipe.
B. Protective Casing. The weLL is protected with a '''·diameter Schedule 80 PVC pipe. The screen
is a 1.5"-diaaeter, slotted-standpipe PVC screen.
D. Steaa Cleaning. Unknown.
IV. Well Intake Design and Well Development
A. Screen. Slotted 1.5"-diaaeter standpipe was installed as the screen.
B. Filter Pack. Chemically-inert sand filter pack was installed. It is unknown whether the well
has been aeasured for turbidity. No results are available.
C. Well Development. Unknown.
V. Annular Space Seals, Aprons, Lock.
A. Well Seal. The well i. sealed from the ground surface to 5.0 feet in depth with a grout
leal. The aethod for grout installation is unknown. The weLL was filled froll 5.0 feet in depth to 17.0 feet
in depth with clay backfill.
•
•
•
c,.o,. TO
IIL.T WITH SOWC I'IMC INtO -_::IIU ... sn .....
""""OCS.'L.T'r '" 101_ ) •• "-n'
GJU>CICII WITH" IoQS'T TO .... ~
ATeD.aL. ZCM& AT ).Il'aT
GJU>0ItS WITH UGH!' CIlIA,. TO ,,_
"L.T'r ""'C _ ..... 0 .II.T
""" YEItS TO ., •• neex
WITH oc:c.u_L. ~ CCI.QIIICD VC __ IOMC IMA"""
~U",
.-,. "PC TQ wc.DIUN _ WITH A
TMet TO SOWC "L.T'r Cl:lAItSC _
_ oc:::A.SICIKAL. ~n.M:I "MIt
GAAVt:l. -_~ CIOdC
GAACCS WITH _C III.T _0
oc:::A.SlQKoOL. ,....,...,."""y c::o.c­
HTltO .aL.14OClUI..ItlI
__ .'L.':"'I' c,.ol" TO Q.lY1:Y III.T
WITH T Aet TQ _ .....: 1NtO­
STUI"II'
GAAOU WITH IIOMIE _"""
I'-.cs
GAAOCS UGW1' ClllAl" TO TA"
WATI:/t LriCL."T It.t I"aT ON ...­
""""OD TO -.eN'" sn .....
~OD WITH IIOMC 11L.T'r r1PC
SAfoO ""''rOIl TO .·,...,ex
GM CItlI TO \I'ICn' STUI"II'
GIIAOCS WITH oc:c.ulONAL.
II'\..OATIIC .....: GllAVCl...uoo TO
STUI"II'
._" I'Ve TO "COIU" """'0 WITH A
"Met TO SOJooC "L.T.uoo IHI'P­
ICOOCI _Y1:Y "L.T .uoo"Ne TO "'r:DIUN .... NO """YVIS TO I· T,uex _
"C&:IIUN .oDeS«
_..0 _~"'T sz.11"aT
ONI-ll-ll
I.S 1_ ::n ..... c:TVI II..O'1'TIID IfT"'NCI~""
.....:OOO~ 1H5T"'~ TO 41.1 n:t:T
LOG OF
:11..°""1 ;sr
, 'SPI'l
4oG ..... "'1
I
~ jI
I • ~SM,
iii jI n
'SI"Il .. .. .. I .. • IS",
BORING SC-9
_ .. StI.T't c:I..A'f 1-.':"
wITH _ 11'11<& .... ..0 .. ..01-." _
.. COlUMsn .....
GaAOU 111.':"'1' '" 101_ L~""::
GaAOU UGHT GAAY TO ~ ... "' ...
W"ITK.ITH'" MOtIT TQ ... TUlII. T'E:I 1CiIL. ZONC _ wITH __
'n4IN 'II.T _.....: .... ..0 """ ....
TO 1I.*nea:
GAA'I"II_ .. n.C TO WCDlUM .....
WITH ... TUc:t TQ _I IlL.':" A..o
IH'n:II.C_~ Q.lYCY SO!..T .... 0 ....
TO .. COIUM ..... O ""'_ 1":) •• not
-WCQlU04 ODell
"---Gl-..I:IU UGHT ~ 'f TO " ...... ..
WICT"C"IIO wM"H \..OS ..... ,. • ...c Q.ly
'" '2 " .s.JI'fl
§ s;uo&..~.
:lI
I
l··........al
I j!
LlGHTT ..... TO~Y_ ... Te IIL.':"'I'
c,.o Y TO c,.oYCY ilL.':" -OCCIU'" sn .....
.... TUl1.IVU AT n.l nCT ON _
GaAOCS wITH .. 11I.T'r ......: .......
'"" 'I'P TO 'I· nflex ~OD TO VEJlY sn .....
GaAOU TO Uc:HT :oA1I:D<I-'
GJU.OD '1"0 __ .. AOoQ _1TIf
oc::.t.SIONAL. n...g.&TIHG I'IIOC
GJU.vCL. __ =-u:TC ... T ".S I"aT
ONI-II-II
,., .HOt Cl\AIIOI';Tt.~ '1..:I'rr'Cl:I1ITA..o~II
"Q:)MCT1:II INSTA~ TO .,.~ 'EI
.u:::.
.. -•• e o
.. lila.,.:) "'OISNIIC ttlU"IUICI:I" ... I'ClIICI:'<TACC
'" THC CItIn' wCICWT '" -.. • 0..., _"..,. CXl'lIasC::I .. '-". PCI'I c:.IltOC
I"OC7T
e .... ~S..:1t I"OC7T '" Il'OCCTIIATtICIN 111_ A
, •• U ..... _" ~ JO I<O<D
II ,.), .. CO ' .. Wl'\.LII ..... AOVANc:tD HYCIIUU~
., rrra"' ...... """" "I -II'IIITOt ....... """" ,.,., -mCNCII ...... """"
.5011-IHI1..JY ...... """" 1:\""1-STA_1I0 IIO<CTllATtICIN nST
~l-ClAOCS II _C ....... """" WI"I"M * II • TV"" CIIIVC IHOC
Ill) -CIA"C. II _C '''''''''"'-&II wnw * O· TV": o",vc .-
• OC,.". "T wt<oCH ~IIICI:I "'MII\..C WAS
CXT"IIACTCO
II STA_JIIOI'OOCTUTlOt TEST
80RINGS
Dames eo. Moorl
"'-----------------.. ----......... .
•
•
•
PDEIS -August, 1982
MAJOR DIVISIONS
(;OAIIS(
GIIAIHIO
SOII.S
--. M .... .. .. , ...... ••
u.!IU. ..... --...... ton
"HI
011"'1,,'0
SOIU
..-.c .... M ....
:tI .. ", ....... , l.lI.l.I.I..LI-.
... W,,", we
GIl AVIL
AHO
Gil AV(U,T
SOILS
......... --'.6&--u:uwa ..... -
'AHO
AHO
,AHOT
SOIU
--'" .. .... .. .. -WII.IIl • -
SILTS
",,,0
C-••• ns
SlLn
1.,,0
cun
son:.
(;LCAH
1\., '''"' •• ..
# •• UI
_. .. , ......
a.U.H J..U60 ......... , .. ..
"'"
SAHO.S ._ . ., -II
\.Ieutl "I." ..w , ••• H
....... ..... ,
\!.1!!lJ hi .. ..
CLASSITICATION
In-PICA!. DESCRIPTIONS
G'N
G?
GM
GC
S'N
SP
.c1. ........... -a.... ... .... ". ....... ..rw.a.. \,.,"', ,. .. ' .....
... It\., ..... , ..... , ............ .
......... n..ta.. .... r~ •• ... .. .....
'*'" .... "'... ....""'".u...­k' """'1
c........ • • ..".... • .... " ...... ....... "'.ea
.t.... ........ ...... • ........ .
.......... "'"' .... I ... .
.... ", ....... e. ,...... .-."tI\4."
.......... ,9\,& .... It",
SC ~ •• I. ... ........ -C\. ... _rl\llCl
CL
OL
CH
CH
PT
CIrA.X'1'
........ ....c .... f. , ... , .. "-C , .... ".. .oc_ n. ......... , ...
a,.."y ".. ........ .. -:","C' .\on ..,.. .... , """"en
........ c c,""'''' ., " •• '" ....... ~ •• """:Jn. ... •• , .... , Q.6"t.
....-.. ... ". It"'. CU"' .... 1 •• .......
.... ...c. "fa ....... ..c
""" Q.,..An .~ ..... ~ •• f'ICI ••
....... .c ... ,... ..c.c,~ .,
".'~cowa , .......... ·1' .... ,.. ......
.~ c ....... ., ....
"'" ... ne,.". I., CL.Itt'l
..... -c (" •••• _ ........ t ....
"'.'''C"" .. u_C ",-, •
... ,,~ .............. "'\0'
... ,. ... .. aau •• e n.t,."
UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
------
•
•
•
LOCAL STRATIGRAPHY AND WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY
SITE: EHVIROCARE OF UTAH, SOUTH CLIVE
COORDINATES: SlBH Sec. 32, T1S, R11W, N 2321.36, E 3544.20
(frOil SII corner)
DATE COHPLETED: 2-18-1982
IIELL NO.: SC-8
AQUIFER: Upper.ast
-SUPERVISED BY: Da.es and Koore,_ Inc.
•
LOCAL
STRATIGRAPHY
AND
WELL SCREEN
PLACE"ENT
(This well wes
not found in
1989. Three
wells were
installed in
1982 for a
pullping test.
The weUs are
in a location
under the
Vitro pile.)
l
Screen
JOB NO. 2352
Elevation of reference point
Height of reference point
above ground surface
Depth of surface s.al
Type of surface seal: GROUT (0-5.0 feet)
I.D. of surface casing
Type of surface casing: Unknown
Depth of surface casing
Not Surveyed
3.0 ft
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
1.0. of riser pipe 6.0·
Type of riser pipe: Unknown
Dia .. ter of borehole Unknown
Type of filler: CLAY BACKFILL (5.0-14.0 ft.)
Elev./depth of top of seal
Type of seal: GROUT (14.0-34.0 ft.)
BENTONITE (34.0-35.0 ft.)
Type of gravel pack: SAND
Elev./depth of top of gravel pack
Elevation depth of top of screen
Description of screen: Unknown
1.0. of screen section
Elev./depth of botte. of screen
Elev./depth of botte. of gravel pack
Elev./depth of botte. of plugged
blank section
Type of filler below plugged section: UNKNOIIN
Elevation of bottOll of borehole
N/A
35.0 ft.
.w.0 ft.
Unknown
55.0
55.0
55.0
Unknown
FIGURE III-10
•
•
•
MONITORING WELL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION WORKSHEET
SC-8
I. Monitoring Well Design
A. SC~8 was designed according to the information on the well construction su ... ry sheet.
II. Drilling Methods
A. Method. The well was drilled (bored) using a truck-MOUnted rotary drill rig and either hollow~
stem auger or rotary-wash drilling methods.
B. Drilling Fluids. Unknown.
C. Fluids Analysis. Unknown.
D. Equipment Cleaning. Unknown.
E. Compressed Air. Unknown.
F. Potentiometric Surface. Unknown.
G. Formation Samples.
1. Collection of Samples. Unknown.
2. Salllpl;ng Methods. Unknown.
3. Collection Intervals. Unknown •
4. Chemical/Physical Tests. No chemical tests were performed on the samples. However, tests
were run to establish soil types and classifications.
III. Monitoring Well Construction Materials
A. Saturated Zone Primary Casing. Unknown.
B. Protective Casing. Unknown.
D. Steam Cleaning. Unknown.
IV. Well Intake DeSign and Well Development
A. Screen. Slotted 1.5M~diameter standpipe was installed as the screen.
B. Filter Pack. Chemically-inert sand filter pack was installed. It is unknown whether the well
has been .... ured for turbidity. No results are available.
C. Well Developtlent. Unknown.
V. Annular Space SeaLs, Aprons, Locks
A. Well Seal. The well is sealed from the ground surface to 5.0 feet in depth with a grout
seal. The method for grout installation is unknown. The well was filled from 5.0 feet in depth to 14.0 feet
in depth with clay backfill •
•
•
•
e'
LOCAL STRATIGRAPHY AND WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY
SITE: EHVIROCARE OF UTAH, SOUTH CLIVE
liEU. NO.: SC-SA
COORDINATES: SLBH Sec. 32, ns, R1111, N 2321.36, E 3544.20
(fl'Oll SY corner)
DATE COMPLETED: 2-18-1982 AQUIFER: Upper80St
SUPERVISED BY: Da.es and Koore,. Inc.
LOCAL
STRATIGRAPHY
AND
IIELL SCREEN
PLACEMENT
9.0 ft.
(This weLL was
not found in
1989. Three
weLLs were
installed in
1982 for a
piJlIPing test.
The wells are
in a location
under the
Vitro pi le.)
33.0 ft.
34.3 ft.
Pack
45.0 ft.
49.3 ft.
l
Screen
JOB NO. 2352
Elevation of reference point *
Height of reference point
above ground surface
Depth of surface seal
Type of surface seal: GROUT (0-5.0 feet)
4282.9
2.7 ft
Unknown
1.0. of surface casing Unknown
Type of surface casing: Unknown
Depth of surface casing Unknown
I.D. of riser pipe 1.5"
Type of riser pipe: Unknown
Dia.eter of borehole Unknown
Type of fi LLer: CLAY BACKFIU. (5.0-33.0 ft.)
Elev./depth of top of seal
Type of seal: NONE
Type of gravel pack: SAND
Elev./depth of top of gravel pack
Elevation depth of top of screen
Description of screen: 1.SM-DIAtiETER
SLOTTED STAND PIPE
1.0. of screen section
Elev./depth of botte. of screen
Elev./depth of botte. of gravel pack
Elev./depth of botte. of plugged
blank s.ction
Type of fi Uer below plugged section: UNICNOIIN
Elevation of botte. of borehole
MIA
4244.8
42'3.5
'.5M
4228.5
4228.5
4228.5
4225.3
ALL elevations are in feet above .. an sea level.
FIGURE III-ll
•
•
•
MONITORING WELL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION WORKSHEET
SC-8A
1. Monitoring WelL Design
A. SC-BA was designed according to the information on the weLL construction suamary sheet.
11. Drilling Methods
A. Method. The well was drilled (bored) using a truck-mounted rotary drilL rig and either hoLlow­
stem auger or 'rotary-wash driLLing aethads.
B. DrilLing fLuids. Unknown.
C. fluids AnaLysis. Unknown.
D. Equipment Cleaning. Unknown.
E. Ca.pressed Air. Unknown.
f. Potentiometric Surface. The potentiOlletric surfaces were documented on the boring logs. However,
the .easureaent was Made at a later date.
G. formation Samples.
1. CoLlection of Samples. Core samples were collected at the depths identified on the boring
logs.
2. Sampling Methods. Unknown •
3. Collection Intervals. See boring log.
4. Cheilical/Physical Tests. No chemieal tests were perforllled on the samples. However, test~
were run to establish soil types and classifications.
Ill. Honitoring Well Construction Haterials
A. Saturated Zone Primary Casing. The weLL is constructed with Schedule 40 PVC pipe.
B. Protective Casing. The well is protected with a 4"-diaaeter Schedule 80 PVC pipe. The screen
is a 1.5"-diaaeter, slotted-standpipe PVC screen.
D. Sten Cleaning. Unknown.
IV. Well Intake Design and WeLL Development
A. Screen. Slotted 1.5"-dineter standpipe was installed as the screen.
B. Filter Pack. the.ieally-inert sand filter pack was installed. It is unknown whether the well
has been .easured for turbidity. No results are availabLe.
C. Well Developllent. Unknown.
V. Annular Space Seals, Aprons, Locks
A. WeLL Seal. The well ;s sealed from the ground surface to 5.0 feet in depth with a grout
seal. The .ethod for grout installation ia unknown. The well was fi LLed fro. 5.0 feet in depth to 30 feet in
depth with clay backfill •
•
•
•
UOUCH .. " ... ' COH\U" ..... I\ INC
LOCAL STRATIGRAPHY AND WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY
SITE: ENVIROCARE OF UTAH, SOUTH CLIVE
WELL NO.: SC-8B
COORDINATES: SLBH Sec. 32, T1S, R11W, N 2321.36, E 3544.20
(frOil SW corner)
DATE COKPLETED: 2-18-1982 AQUIFER: Upper.,st
..... "",,, ... SED BY: DalleS and Itoore, .Inc.
LOCAL
STRATIGRAPHY
AND
WEll SCREEN
PLACE"ENT
CTMa well was
not found in
1989. Three
wella were
installed in
1982 for a
pullping test.
The wella are
in a location
under the
Vitro pi le.)
P.ck
JOB NO. 2352
Elevation of reference potnt
Height of reference point
above ground aurface
Not Surveyed
3.0 ft
Depth of aurface aeal Unknown
Type of aurface aeal: GROUT (0-5.0 feet)
1.0. of aurface casing Unknown
Type of surface casing: Unknown
Depth of aurface casing Unknown
1.0. of riser pipe 1.SM
Type of riser pipe: Unknown
Dia.eter of borehole Unknown
Type of ftller: CLAY BACKFILL (5.0-12.0 ft.)
Elev./depth of top of seal
Type of seal: GROUT (12.0-39.0 ft.)
BENTONITE (39.0-40.0 ft.)
Type of gr.vel pack: SAND
Elev./depth of top of gravel pack
Elevation depth of top of acreen
Deacription of acreen: Unknown
1.0. of screen section
Elev./depth of bottOi of screen
Elev./depth of bottOi of gravel pack
Elev./depth of botto. of plugged
blank aectton
Type of filler below plugged aection:
Elevation of botto. of borehole
UNKNOWN
N/A
40.0 ft.
45.0 ft.
Unknown
55.0
55.0
55.0
Unknown
FIGURE 111-12
•
•
•
MONITORING WELL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION WORKSHEET
SC-8B
1. Konitoring Well Deslgn
A. SC-8B was designed according to the information on the well construction summary sheet.
11. Drilling "ethods
A. ~thod. The well was drilled (bored) using a truck-DOUnted rotary drill rig and either hollow­
stem auger or rotary-wash drilling methods.
B. Drilling Fluids. Unknown.
C. Fluids Analysis. Unknown.
D. Equipment Cleaning. Unknown.
E. Ca.pressed Air. Unknown.
f. Potentiometric Surface. Unknown.
G. Foraation Samples.
1. Collection of Samples. Unknown.
2. Saatpl iog "ethods. Unknown.
3. Collection Intervals. Unknown •
4. Chemical/Physical Tests. No chemical testa were performed on the saatplea. However, teat a
were run to establish soil types and classifications.
Ill. Konitoriog Well Construction Materials
A. Saturated Zone Priaary Casing. Unknown.
B. Protective Casing. Unknown.
D. Steam Cleaning. Unknown.
IV. Well Intake Design and Well Development
A. Screen. Slotted 1.5u-diameter standpipe was installed as the screen.
B. Filter Pack. Chemically-inert sand filter peck was installed. It is unknown whether the well
has been ... aured for turbidity. No reaults are available.
C. Well Development. Unknown.
V. Annular Spece Seals, Aprons, Locks
A. Well Seal. The well is sealed froa the ground surface to 5.0 feet in depth with a grout
seal. The .ethod for grout installation is unknown. The well was filled from 5.0 feet in depth to 12.0 feet
in depth with clay backfill •
•
•
•
LOCAL STRATIGRAPHY AND WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY
SITE: ENVIROCARE OF UTAH, SOUTH CLIVE
COORDINATES: SLBH Sec. 32, T1S, R11W, N 3723.56, E 3~9S.90
(fro. SII corner)
DATE COHPLETED: 2-19-1982 AQUIFER: Upperaost
SUPERVISED BY: Daaes and Koore,_ Inc.
LOCAL
STRATIGRAPHY
AND
WEU SCREEN
PLACEHENT
(This well was
not found in
1989. The
well 15
located under
Vitro pile.)
10.0 ft.
Elevation of reference point *
Height of reference point
above ground surface
Depth of surface seal
Type of surface seal: GROUT (0-4.0 feet)
I.D. of surface casing
Type of surface casing: Unknown
Depth of surface casing
I.D. of riser pipe
Type of riser pipe: Unknown
Dia~ter of borehole
Type of filler: CLAY BACKFILL (4.0-20.5 ft.)
Elev./depth of top of seal
Type of seal: NONE
Type of gravel pack: SAND
Elev./depth of top of gravel pack
Elevation depth of top of screen
I*"<.,~ pack Description of screen: 1.5M-DIAMETER
--", .. IL
Screen
SLOTTED STAND PIPE
I.D. of screen section
Elev./depth of bottoa 01 screen
Elev ./depth of bottoa of gravel pack
Elev./depth of bottoa of plugged
blank section
Type of fi Uer below plugged section: UNICNOWN
Elevation of bottoa of borehole
4283.2
4.4 ft
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
1.5·
Unknown
N/A
4250.3
4248.8
1.5M
4233.8
4233.8
4233.8
4233.3
* All elevationa are in feet above ~an sea level.
JOB NO. 2352 FIGURE III-13
•
•
•
MONITORING WELL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION WORKSHEET
SC-9
1. "onitoring Well Design
A. SC-9 was designed according to the information on the well construction su..ary sheet.
11. Drilling "ethods
A. "ethad. The well was drilled (bored) using a truck-lOUnted rotary drill rig and either hollow­
ste. auger or rotary-wash drilling .ethods.
B. Drilling Fluids. Unknown.
C. Fluids Analysis. Unknown.
D. Equipaent Cleaning. Unknown.
E. Ca.pressed Air. Unknown.
F. PotentiOMetric Surface. The potentiOMetric surfaces were docuMented on the boring logs. However,
the measureMent was made at a later date.
G. ForllBtion SallPles.
1. Collection of Sa.ples. Core samples were collected at the depths identified on the boring
logs.
2. Sallp ling "ethads. Unknown •
3. Collection Intervals. See boring log.
4. Ch.ical/Physical Tests. No ch.ical tests were perforMed on the sallples. However, telts
were run to establish soil types and classifications.
III. Honitoring Well Construction Haterials
A. Saturated Zone Primary Casing. The well is constructed with Schedule 40 PVC pipe.
B. Protective Casing. The well is protected with a 4"-diaaeter Schedule 80 PVC pipe. The screen
is a 1.5u -diaaeter, slotted-standpipe PVC screen.
D. Steaa Cleaning. Unknown.
IV. Well Intake Design and Well DevelopMent
A. Screen. Slotted 1.5M-dia.eter standpipe was installed as the screen.
8. Filter Pack. Ch.ically-inert sand filter pack was installed. It is unknown whether the well
he. been .... ured for turbidity. No r •• ult. ar. available.
C. Well Development. Unknown.
V. Annular Space Seals, Aprons, Locks
A. Well Seal. The well is sealed fro. the ground surface to 4.0 feet in depth with a grout
seal. Th. _thod for grout installation is unknown. The well was filled from 4.0 feet in depth to 20.5 feet
in depth with clay backfill •
. ,
•
•
.. lot .. ..
:a ...
eORiNG SC-IO
-.-.. 111." Cl.AY TO Cl.AVC;Y III.T
_me 50MII I"N .... ..0 -"£OIUN
IT1I"'I"
GAAIXS 111." '" U""':II Z.O nJ:T '---cw,oc:s UGHT GMV ANO wme ..
_T TO .... TWVon;1I lIOIl. ZOot,
GlUlCIC.S wme UGHT TA ... _ wMtMt ILTVI"N __ II
.II.T I.AY1:ItS TO ",. '""CX
UGHT ' __ Y I'INC TO "CIIIU"
...... 0 WI"/'M A TMex TO _ III.T
AN(! lHTP'I[1)OCQ Cl.Ayc;y III.T A..o
I"N TO WCDIUIO ...... 0 -weO .....
:&NS&
GMCIC.S wme oc::::AS1CooA1.
n..c.ATlHG ,--GMYQ,.
UGHI' _ III.TV Cl.AT TO cu. T1:T
SII.T _me IOWC 1'1HC ...... 0 -..... 0
. GMIXS TO "",110 "NO Wme sowc: .... flTlAu.. T C:::UOCHTCII
tcIl.~
GaAOD TO I.GHT~_
GMY
GMCIC.S TO .,."..
IS","' WATI:JI ~I:I..AT R..' n:rr ClH _
GAAD&:s wme WOlle: cu.yc;y
SII.T _D TO \tDlY nll'"l"
OIIIADeS "'CX TO ""'...: SII.TY cu.T _ TO ST'I""
GlIIADeI ... CX TO WOII' cu.T1:T
III.T .. ..0 TO _01_ nll'"l"
--CQWf'U:T'CO.AT ... 0 neT CHI-a-a
'.' ..ot OIA"ETCIlILOTTCO n .. .,of'll"!:
f'l1I:ZONCT'I:Jl _TA I..I..C) TO ... 0 'aT
..!C!:.
.. -•• c o
A I'1C:UI ~"C I:lU'OIUSI[1) A' .. 1I"tJICI:H1"""1t Off TMI: gay _1:.IGN'r Off I0Il.
• DII'T _rTY iElU'IIU$CII IN LIII. "':11 c.l8IC
P'OI:1f'
C ... _ PCJII P'OI:1f' Off f'CMI:'TI!ATICH us_ ..
I .. U. ""'_ 01\0I"I'_ )0 II'CMU
" II'I.ISHCO !SA-";II w'" .. OVAlOC.CII 1f'I'0lltAUUCAI.I..IC' o TY1'U Of' .... """"'-0 ~I-"IIITCN ..... 1'\.&11
!nl-I'fTCICIII ...... 1'\.&11
0 .. ,-tHCL.IY .... """"'-0 On,-n_I'I:I<CTlOATICH TItST
1"-OAWU. _I: .... """-1:11 WfTM • U· TY!"C :::IRIV'C __
«II-OAWU. _C .... -I.CII_me
• II' T"YP1: ~IV' _
• Dl:1I'TM .. T WHICK UOoOUn'\IJII.CO ...... P'U[ '''''S
D:f1IACTI:O
Q n_"" I'OfI:TIIIATICH 'I'UT
LOG OF
.. .. .. .
Z
:: .. l!l
, .. 1 .. :1._' ........ "-11_ ,:..
:I "' IS"'"
III
a
XI
•
:a 25 I""
J • ISIII
::I 15 Isn,
I!:",
:a 10 ISI'TI
J+ ISI'TI
ssUO"JI,oot!!1 I:'.
:a t'J ISI'TI
:a " ISI'TI
BORING SC-II
_ .. 111." cu. T TO cu.ycy III.T
wme _I: _I: SAND -tTl"
GMOCS III."" ... UPf'CII l. ~ n:r:r GMOCS UGH1' GMY _ wme A
WOsaT TO .... """"'TaI _I. :.::::..c
GMOCS wme "I.~"'-
UGH'!' T .... _..rn: $ll.T &.A_
TO •.•• 'ntICX
'-"'_Y I'INC TO Wl::l1UW ..... wme A TMex TO _III.T_ _.COOI:.II cu.ycy IIIoT __ IE
TO "CO_ ...... 0 &.A_ TO ,. 'ntICX -WCIII __ '
GlIIAOCS wme U:P SII.T AND
cu.,.
GMOCS wme IAItOY TO III.T'I'
c::.,ATI.AYCItS
GMOIEI TO DOd&
._ SlI.~ c::.,AY TO Cl.AYCY 'II.T
_me SOMe: I"N .... ND -.,.,.".
GMOIEI wme .. I"N _ wme
.. TMex TOIOW& ILT &.A_
TO.' THlCX.AT ::a.' n:r:r
I..CVa.. .AT I.L. n:r:r 00 )o+oCZ
'---.i:IU'OICIL UCHT GMY TO T ..... _ .... rn: wme _, ::::u.ycy .II.T
_0 TO OCOAIW 1IT1"
GMOCS TO GlIIlEo._y _
"ITM A IIIoTY"HIE SAND I.AYVI
'":'0 II-THtCX -"C::tuM Cl)cSC
1011_ c::M1'I.I:TI:O AT 'i.0 lI'1:I:T
CH.t-u-a
'.S ..ot 0IA"1:T1:11 II..:n"l'I:D n .... o .. 1't:
"IC:OWCTU lICIT Au.DI TO 'i.0 I"UT
SO,RINGS
Dames & Moore
•
•
•
LOCAL STRATIGRAPHY AND WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY
SITE: ENVIROCARE OF UTAH, SOUTH CLIVE
WELL NO.: SC-10
COORDINATES: SLBH Sec. 32, T1S, R11Y, N 5073.06, E 3440.30
(from SY corner)
DATE COKPLETED: 2-22-1982 AQUIFER: UpperllOst
SUPERVISED BY: Daaes and Koore,.Inc.
LOCAL
STRATIGRAPHY
AND
YELL SCREEN
PLACE"ENT
10.0 ft.
Pack
1==="""'--'-,".0 ft.
Elevation of reference point *
Height of reference point
above ground surface
Depth of surface seal
Type of surface seal: GROUT (0-4.0 feet)
1.0. of surface casing
Type of surface casing: Sch. SO PVC
Depth of surface casing
1.0. of riser pipe
Type of riser pipe: Sch. 40 PVC
Diaaeter of borehole
Type of filler: CLAY BACKFILL (4.0·32.5 ft.)
ELev./depth of top of seal
Type of seal: NONE
Type of gravel pecic: SAND
Elev./depth of top of gravel pack
Elevation depth of top of screen
Description of screen: 1.S"-DIAMETER
SLOTTED STAND PIPE
1.0. of screen section
Elev./depth of bottOil of screen
ELev./depth of bottOil of gravel pack
Elev./depth of bottOil of plugged
blank section
Type of fiLLer below plugged section: UNICHOWN
Elevation of bottOil of borehole
4284.1
4.1 ft
Unknown
4"
Unknown
1.5"
Unknown
N/A
4247.5
4247.0
1.5"
4232.0
4232.0
4232.0
4232.0
* All eLevation. are in feet above aean s .. LeveL.
JOB NO. 2352 FIGURE 111-14
•
•
•
MONITORING WELL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION WORKSHEET
SC-IO
I. Monitoring Well Design
A. SC-10 was designed according to the inforaation on the well construction summery sheet.
II. Drilling Methods
A. Method. The well was arilled (bored) using a truck-lOUnted rotary drill rig and either hollow­
stem auger or rotary-wash drilling methods.
B. Drilling Fluids. Unknown.
C. Fluids Analysis. Unknown.
D. Equipment Cleaning. Unknown.
E. Ca.pressed Air. Unknown.
F. Potentio.etric Surface. The potentiometric surfaces were documented on the boring logs. However,
the .easurement was aade at a later date.
G. Foraation Samples.
1. Collection of Samples. Core samples were collected at the depths identified on the boring
logs.
2. Sampling Methods. Unknown •
3. Collection Intervals. See boring log.
4. Chemical/Physical Tests. No chemical tests were performed on the samples. However, tests
were run to establish soil types and classifications.
III. Monitoring Well Construction Materials
A. Saturated Zone Priaary Casing. The well is constructed with Schedule 40 PVC pipe.
B. Protective Casing. The well is protected with a 4"-diameter Schedule 80 PVC pipe. The screen
is a 1.5M-dia.eter, slotted-standpipe PVC screen.
D. Steam Cleaning. Unknown.
IV. Well Intake Design and Well Develop.ent
A. Screen. Slotted 1.5"-dia.eter standpipe was installed as the screen.
B. Filter Pack. Chemically-inert sand filter pack was installed. It is unknown whether the well
has been measured for turbidity. No results are available.
c. Well Development. Unknown.
V. Annular Space Seals, Aprons, Locks
A. Well Seal. The well is sealed from the ground surface to 4.0 feet in depth with a grout
seal. The method for grout installation is unknown. The well was filled fro. 4.0 feet in depth to 32.5 feet
in depth with clay backfill. The well is locked to prevent tampering .
•
•
•
LOCAL STRATIGRAPHY AND WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY
SITE: ENVIROCARE OF UTAH, SOUTH CLIVE
VELL NO.: SC~11
COORDINATES: SLBtt Sec. 32, T1S, R11W, N 5007.86, E 1800.40
(fl'Oll SV comer)
DATE COKPLETED: 2-23-1982 AQUIFER: Upper.ost
SUPERVISED BY: 0 .... and Moore, ~nc.
LOCAL
STRATIGRAPHY
AND
WELL SCREEN
PLACE"ENT
Elevation of reference point *
Height of reference point
above ground .urface
Depth of .urface .eal
Type of .urface .eal: GROUT (D~3.5 feet)
1.0. of surface casing
Type of .urface casing: Sch. 80 PVC
Depth of .urface ca.ing
1.0. of ri.er pipe
Type of riser pipe: Sch. 40 PVC
Dia .. ter of borehole
Type of filler: CLAY BACKFILL (3.5~29.0 ft.)
Elev./depth of top of seal
Type of .eal: NONE
Type of gravel paclc: SAND
Elev ./depth of top of gravel pack
Elevation depth of top of .creen
.... oCt ...... Paclc De.cription of .creen: 1.5"-DlAIIETER
'---1IftLl
Screen
SLOTTED STAND PIPE
I.D. of .creen .ection
ELev ./depth of bot tOIl of .creen
ELev./depth of bottOil of gravel pack
Elev./depth of bottOil of plugged
blank .ection
\00 Type of filler below plugged section: UNI<NOIlN
Elevation of bottOil of borehole
4280.8
4.8 ft
Unknown
4"
Unknown
Unknown
N/A
4247.0
4246.0
1.5"
4231.0
4231.0
4231.0
4231.0
* All elevation. are in feet above Men lea level.
JOB NO. 2352 FIGURE 111-15
•
•
•
MONITORING WELL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION WORKSHEET
SC-ll
1. "onitor;ng Well Deslgn
A. SC-11 was designed according to the information on the well construction SUDlary sheet.
11. Drilling "ethods
A. "ethod. The well was drilled (bored) using a truck-mounted rotary drill rig and either hollow­
ate. auger or rotary-wash drilling aethods.
B. Drilling Fluids. Unknown.
C. Fluids Analys;s. Unknown.
D. Equi~ent Cleaning. Unknown.
E. COIIpresaed Air. Unknown.
F. Potentioaetric Surface. The potentioetric surfaces were documented on the boring logs. However,
the aeaaureaent was aade at a later date.
G. Formation Sa~les.
1. Collection of Sa~les. Core sa~les were collected at the depths identified on the boring
logs.
2. Sampling "ethods. Unknown •
3. Collection Intervals. See boring log.
4. Chemical/Physical Tests. No che.ical tests were perforaed on the samples. However, test~
were run to establish soil types and classifications.
III. Konitoring Well Construction "aterials
A. Saturated Zone Priaary Casing. The well ia constructed with Schedule 40 PVC pipe.
B. Protective casing. The well is protected with a 4"-dia.eter Schedule 80 PVC pipe. The screen
is a 1.5"-diaeeter, slotted-standpipe PVC screen.
D. Steam Cleaning. Unknown.
IV. Well Intake Deaign and Well Development
A. Screen. Slotted 1.5"-diameter standpipe was installed as the screen.
B. Filter Pack. C~ically-inert sand filter pack was installed. It is unknown whether the well
haa been llltasured for turbidity. No results are available.
C. Well Developaent. Unknown.
V. Amular Space Seals, Aprons, Locks
A. Well Seal. The well is sealed frOll the ground surface to 3.5 feet in depth with a grout
seal. The llethad for grout instaUation is unknown. The well was fiUed from 3.5 feet in depth to 29 feet in
depth with clay backfill. The well is locked to prevent tampering •
•
•
•
PDEIS -August. 198Z
JlAJOR DIVISIONS
COAIIS[
G'UIN'O
SOIl.'
--... .. ., .. , ...... ..
U!J.U. ---_ ""1 ,.n
'.N'
G'U'N,O
SOIU
..... "" .... ,
:II ... 'ce, ... II
l1U..U..I -.. , ..... we WI
U"VEL
""0
GIIAVll.l.T
SOIU
..... ... .
til ........ '.ac-
eL"''' GIIAVEI.S
n •• tf'\.& •• .. ,._ ...
-&a.IlsIll .... -'1(>· .... £ ...... ......
110,.0 ",.0
,A,.OT
SOIU
., a_ ' ... ·1110-· ... ' ..... ._ . .' ....... .... u.-.... -
"loTS
"NO
CO_iTS
"', ... .. 'a,'
UU , .... ..
.... .". .. .. ,'
\!.I..!.!l.S "" ... to
MQC.T OIlGA"'1(; SOl1..5
son. CLASSITICA TION
ITYPlC.JL DESCRIPTIONS
G'N
G?
GM
GC
S'N
SP
SM
SC
WI.
CI.
01.
J.lH
CH
CH
PT
CSAR'r
..a... • ...... •• -a.'. "AIWC\. ..
..... ...ftloilCL ~t'1'\.' ,. .. ' ....
...~. • ..... c. .. •• e .. 1. •••• c .... ..... ..'fWt.... ",''"U' •• .. "' ....
.... " ... -1 .............. ~ ..... , ... , ... .
c ......... ..,e .............. ......
Q...t.P ... "' •• ,
...... .. ...... ....... , .... '" ... "
.... ,. ",.f'9'\' , ... ,t ... .
... .,."., • .... c. , ...... , •••• ",,_ ......... ".''''' .... , ....
..... .....c: .... " ... "C" " .. ,..... _OCI "-0\/14.. """. M
Q. • .,cy ............. "'.'C' ... " .......... _, """"cn
........ c Ct. .. " ., \-Ie .... c~
~ ... ..-:a,y. .......... .... .. .. ....... "An_ It,-'" Cutl. \. ••• CL.t.
... ...c .... '1 " ...... .... k'" a...tn ., "' •• ~ •• na.,"
......... c -"" ..c"Uewl ••
... ,a..w:C0... 't'" ..... ' •• .... " .......
.~ c",at. fill _ •
~ ... nc"'f. ,a, Q.6"
"C .................. , .... . .. r. ... ........ per,.,.
UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
•
•
•
PDEIS -Aagust. 1962
-.. 1M ...
BORING SC-12 CIXIfIOIIiIATU ".un.' , a .. -a .•
'---CW,o.:lI TO UGW'/' GllAY.u.o WITM
A _.,. TO SATUAAlTO $QI.
1i'!~~4 __ .cZCiNl:llUtCS WITM AL~T1...a
:a , \..,
ISNt
:a .T ISI"I'I
.!I.CC.
"-I.e o
UQIotI' TAN_WITI I'I.T
UYCIIS TO II.· TMICX .-..c TO I(C.OIUN s...oo WITM A
T1lAClt TO SOMC 54I.T -.... 0._
CIDIH
UCHT ._ SILTY c::I.A,. TO CLA't"£Y
III.T WITH 1ICIIIoIC.-..c s...oo-YDrT
n"" u:vn. AT i7.-nrr a. _
CAAClI:S TO UCiHT GJlCD«_
GllAY _ TO "In'
GllAClI:S WITM IC1II1[ CLA n:T
SLT _0 TO yO"/' nll'1'
GlllAOO wm< _ .u.n TO
CI..l vrr I'IIC ..,.100 LA TEJtS TO
""THlCX
GIIA""~" "we TO WCD"''' ..,. .. 0
WITM .. TMCIt TO IC/ooIC IIl.r­
"C"'''COdC
GAADClITO_1
GllAtCS WITM 4 c::I.A't"£Y ',1..,.
UY£I'I TO J"TMICX
110_ c:::lM1"\.rf1:.O AT SI. ~ r'CI:T a.a-U-R
•• t IIOCK O .... wt:TU 'u:rm:o STA .. CI'1J>t: 1"G~1I _TAu..tl) TO .... I"a;T
.. 1''ll:Ul101IOIS'1V1t11~UKO A' A Pt:IIIClI:)tTAGC
01' TIC DIn' wOGiO" 0lIl' ICII.
• DIn' DOdIT'Y IXI'ltu.lCD ... I.M. J>t:It CJ_ lI'OCn'
C IU:IWS rI:R lI'OCn' 01' Pt:ICT1tATION UI_ .. .... L.a. ""...cit __ 1IO IIOCKU
.. I'USMIO 1IA"""'-C1t w .. s "OYAHCZD -.&uUC-'LUCI o T"I'P'U 0lIl' """""-DI 001-I'ISTCIH ..... 1'1.DI
"..." -1'1T0CII """"""" hl-IHG.n' """1'1.DI
IS""'-J:1'~"o I"OCTJU,TlCN TaT
.,,-OAWU. _I ..... """" WITM • V' TYP'C DIIIV'C SHOe 11)'-OAMU .. _C ..,. .... U;" WfTM
'O"TYJ>t:_VCtIHOC • OII:..,... .. T _ ~.e:o ..,. .. """ WAS
C""""'CTTO
g ""-""0 1"GoCT ..... "CN TaT
LOG OF
80RING SC-13 _TU "'Htl.S , lit,....
.. w .. ...
10.-----
BORINGS
I..lGHT _ .. _,. ,-. TO .... DIV ..
_0 wmc .. TIIACIt ':'a __ IL'l' ... 0
l'fT£I'IlCIIOCO c::I.AY'I:'I' .'I.T _ 'IC ..
TO .. GlUM OAtoi:ILAtUS TO" 'nt!cx •
-COde:
GAAOU TO _ 0II:MlK_
.... cx .. mc _ CLAY'I:'I' ... .,.
.ATIJt LriCL AT ::S •• ra:T :IN __ •
I..lGHr "A~"'II.~ c::I.AY TO
CI..l't"£Y III. T wITH ICIotC 1'MIt III.~
I'WC s...oo _ '''TY LAft .. TO J'
...... CX-~
...... --CWIOll::ll TO GAI_w-GIIAY _
WITM A "I.~ I"WC s...oo LA't'C1I ':'a
IZ" ~"T III.~ I"1:ET -.... _ '
CCHM
GaADICS WITM 4 I"WC ......, wmc
4 'l'IUoCltTO_IIII.'!' LATIUI
TQ "'TMICX
GAA ....... .,.QoWM SlI. TY TO c:...o't"£Y _I TO oeDlUN _ -_I
_ I"IHC TO >CD"' .. _ wmc A
TMCIt TO _liLT _ CLAY­
"CIIUOO OOdI
GIIAOCS TO VI:It'I' OCICII.
1IC1t_ ~m AT ... ~ r'CI:T
CNa-D-R
1.1 IHCH lIIAWCTIII II.D'1"'I"CII .,.&""" .. 1:
Jl'lC:c::NCT£I'I_"I.I.lO TO III.' n:r.'
Cames& Moor
•
•
•
PDZIS -August. 198%
MAJOR DIVISIONS
COAltSC
GltAUtCO
SOILS
_ ....... ~
., .. , ....... II
uu.u. ..... .
_ ...... "H
_ ....... ,
':III .. rr ..... I'
IJII.I.I..U -• , .. W\O'I III'
GltAYCL
ANO
GIt loY CI.l.1'
'O''-S
.... , .... ., -.. '·64-
CLEAH GltAYCL'
auf"" •• ..
"ifltcaa
_ &a.II.IQ ,..... .. tt~ ..... _r ...... ,., _ .. -
,10110
ANO
SA 1101'
SOIU
_..... .., SAHCS wmt n.(, .. -, ......... -"., ......
".. !I.I.IIIa No ........
SILTS
ANO
C'-ATS
SILTS
.... NO
CU.TS
" ........... , IIo..tU , .... ..
HlCH.T OltG.u.1C SOILS
son. CLASSIl"ICATION
G'"
G?
GM
GC
S'N
SP
sa..
SC
loll.
CI.
01.
MH
CH
CH
PT
CBAltT
rtPfCAL DESCRIPTIONS
-c\,L .............. J~ "oWC",,,
........ twe .... "f'''''' ,. --' ....
... 111.., ............ c .......... ".
......... ~ .... \toI'f'\..C .. ... .. .....
.. ", ... c"' .... tAl ..... • .......
k' "If"'"
'''' .... ' ..... C"' ........... .... a... ..."'ac,
a'",,,, .. ...... ' •• ". , .... ,"' ... , .......... 1'9\,' .... , ... .
,.. ... , • ..... c. • .......... 1\401' ....... ",.t"', .......... .
........ .tIMIIC .... ', ... ",a' fttIC ....... -.c. 1\. ..... , .. "".. .. a.,.,., .... ~ .. '::l.a •• , _ .. n .......... , ~ .... 'tCI"
..... .c ' ..... n ., .... ,.. .c~
--" •• """::Ir." ......... "', &1..." .. ..... a..A ... ,,"," ...... t •• ""'M
..... f •
..........c .... ,. "" .... ...
""" ca..an ....... "", •• ,.,.
.......... "'t.. iMIIC.C'~ •• ",":...acC~ I..... ..... ' •• ....... ......
,.........c c ... t .... _
...... nca'''. ,., a..YI
.... , ........................ .
... ,. ... • ..... 'c c..f"_,,
UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
•
•
•
/:
Ioms
LOCAL STRATIGRAPHY AND WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY
SITE: ENV1ROCARE OF UTAH, SOUTH CL1VE
UELL NO.: 5C-12
COORDINATES: SLBK Sec. 32, T1S, R11U, N 3648.76, E 1853.40
(from SU corner)
DATE COftPLETED: 2-24-1982 AQUIFER: Upper.ost
SUPERV1SED BY: DalleS and Itoore, .Inc.
LOCAL
STRATIGRAPHY
AND
WEll SCREEN
PLACE"ENT
Elevation of reference point *
Height of reference point
above ground surface
42n.S
2.6 ft
Depth of surface seal Unknown
Type of surface seal: GROUT (0-46.5 feet)
1.0. of surface casing 4"
Type of surface casing: 5ch. 80 PVC
Depth of surface casing
1.0. of riser pipe
Type of riser pipe: sch. 40 PVC
Dialleter of borehole
Type of filler: NONE
Elev./depth of top of seal
Type of seal: BENTONITE (46.5-47.5 ft.)
Type of gravel pack: SAND
Elev./depth of top of gravel pack
Elevation depth of top of screen
Description of screen: 1.5"-DIAHETER
SLOTTED STAND P1PE
1.0. of screen section
Elev./depth of botta. of screen
Elev./depth of botto. of gravel pack
Elev./depth of botto. of plugged
blank section
Type of fi Her below plugged section: UHI<NOIIH
Elevation of botta. of borehole
Unknown
1.5"
Unknown
4228.4
4227.4
4221.9
1.5"
4216.9
4216.9
4216.9
4216.9
* All eLevations are in teet above !lean sea level.
JOB NO. 2352 FIGURE 111-16
•
•
•
MONITORING WELL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION WORKSHEET
SC-12
1. Monitoring Well Deslgn
A. SC-12 was designed according to the information on the well construction summary sheet.
11. Drilling Methods
A. Method. The well was arilled (bored) using a truck-.aunted rotary drill rig and either hollow­
stea auger or rotary-wash drilling methods.
B. Drilling Fluids. Unknown.
c. Fluids Analysis. Unknown.
D. Equipeent Cleaning. Unknown.
E. COilpressed Air. Unknown.
F. PotentiOiletric !i.trface. The potentiometric surfaces were documented on the boring logs. However,
the .easur.-ent was aade at a later date.
G. Foraation SallPles.
1. Collection of Samples. Core samples were collected at the depths identified on the boring
logs.
2. SallPling Methods. Unknown •
3. Collection Intervals. See boring log.
4. Cheaical/Physical Tests. No chemical tests were performed on the samples. However, test~
were run to establish soil types and classifications.
III. Monitoring Well Construction Haterials
A. Saturated Zone Priaary Casing. The well is constructed with Schedule 40 PVC pipe.
B. Protective Casing. The well is protected with a 4"-diameter Schedule 80 PVC pipe. The screen
is a 1.SQ-dia .. ter, slotted-standpipe PVC screen.
D. Stea. Cleaning. Unknown.
IV. Well Intake Design and Well Developeent
A. Screen. Slotted 1.S"-diameter standpipe was ins~alled as the screen.
B. Filter Pack. Cheaically-inert sand filter pack was installed. It is unknown whether the well
has been IINsured for turbidity. No results are available.
C. Vell Developeent. Unknown.
V. Annular Space Seals, Aprons, Locks
A. Vell Seal. The well is sealed fro. the ground surface to 46.5 feet in depth with a grout
seal. The .. thod for grout installation is unknown. The well has been locked to prevent tallpering •
•
•
•
LOCAL STRATIGRAPHY AND WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY
SITE: ENVIROCARE OF UTAH, SOUTH CLIVE
COORDINATES: SLBK Sec. 32, T1S, R11W, N 2287.96, E 1883.30
(from SW corner)
AQUIFER: UpperllOst
SUPERVISED BY: Dames and Hoore,_Inc.
LOCAL
STRATIGRAPHY
AND
WELL SCREEN
PLACEHENT
... -c. ...... Pack
Elevation of reference point *
Height of reference point
above ground surface
Depth of surface seal
Type of surface seal: NONE
1.0. of surface casing
Type of surface casing: Sch. 80 PVC
Depth of surface casing
1.0. of riser pipe
Type of riser pipe: Sch. 40 PVC
Diameter of borehole
Type of filler: CLAY BACKFILL (0.0-43.0 ft.)
Elev./depth of top of seal
Type of seal: BENTONITE (43.0-45.S ft.)
Type of gravel pack: SAND
Elev./depth of top of gravel pack
Elevation depth of top of acreen
Description of acreen: 1.5M.DIAMETER
SLOTTED STAND PIPE
I.D. of acreen section
Elev./depth of bottOil of screen
Elev./depth of bottOil of gravel pack
Elev./depth of bottOil of plugged
blank section
Type of fi Uer below plugged section: UNKNOUN
Elevation of bottOil of borehole
4279.5
5.1 ft
Unknown
Unknown
unknown
4231.4
4228.9
4222.4
1.5M
4219.4
4219.4
4219.4
4218.4
* All elevations are in feet above .. an sea level.
JOB NO. 2352 FIGURE III-17
•
•
•
MONITORING WELL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION WORKSHEET
SC-13
1. Monitoring Well Deslgn
A. SC-13 was designed according to the inforaation on the well construction su..ary sheet.
11. Drilling Methods
A. Method. The well was drilled (bored) using a truck-mounted rotary drill rig and either hollow­
st~ auger or rotary-wash drilling .ethods.
B. Drilling Fluids. Unknown.
C. Fluids Analysis. Unknown.
D. Equi~ent Cleaning. Unknown.
E. Ca.pressed Air. Unknown.
F. Potent;Clllletric Surface. The potentio.etric surfaces were docu.ented on the boring logs. However,
the ~sure.ent was .ade at a later date.
G. For.tion Samples.
1. Collection of samples. Core salllples were collected at the depths identified on the boring
logs.
2. Sampling Methods. Unknown •
3. Collection Intervals. See boring log.
4. Chelllical/Physical Tests. No chelllical tests were perforllied on the samples. However, test~
were run to establish soil types and classifications.
111. MOnitoring Well Construction Katerials
A. Saturated Zone Prilll8ry Casing. The well ;s constructed with Schedule 4() PVC pipe.
B. Protective Casing. The well is protected with a 4"-diallleter Schedule 80 PVC pipe. The screen
i, • 1.5u-diallleter, ,lotted-standpipe PVC ,creen.
D. Stea. Cleaning. Unknown.
IV. Well Intake Design and Well Developillent
A. Screen. Slotted 1.S"-diaeter standpipe was installed as the screen.
B. Filter Pack. Chemically-inert sand filter pack was installed. It is unknown whether the well
has been .. sured for turbidity. No results are available.
C. Well Developlllent. Unknown.
V. Annular Space Seals, Aprons, Locks
A. Well Seal. The well has no seal. The well was back filled to 43 feet in depth with clay
backfill. The well hal been locked to prevent tampering •
rifE JACOBS ENGfNEERING GROUP INC. ~ ... DVA-HeID Inn .. , DIVISION, ALIUQUUQUI O"UTIOHS • BOREHOLE LOG . Pagei.of 2-
A SITE 10: el..I tie tOCA TlON 10:<: l..C .. 2.01-M ~ APPROX. SITE COORDINATES (ft.): N E ______________ _
GROUND ELEVATION (f!" MSL): DRILLING METHOD: y, .:i&" -H~, S"~.-;::;..,.-----
DRILLER: . ,..,..., A ,<!. T"", "-' E. e-
OA TE 5T ARTED::2-4
DA. TE COMPLETEQ.~: • ...::;;u+.,..:-~L""""f ""-=-----
FIELD REP.: 8 _J::!..'!::d
LOCATION DESCRIPTION '1,... 1000' e. 0 F II (ce.~!: ;?C, ........ 4000' S. 0;:
SITE CONDITION l,vl-I $;:)O~ ) f5 . Ii( .
~.­-
10
UNIFIED
SOIL CLASS.
CL
VISUAL CLASS.:
SA#PXS/'-~ SQ".I", . .p, -?,,.d./Sr.;' .. .,,..c-
c~:t./ Ny-/I:I~ ,....z-, v: Ie.· /"1":. ~:,.".,.,.s
SAAli:>/ cI ('n -tjt-",J I So,..,t:,. C;'/t/ sf /"-c.
c.u..l-d . .1 Air; v: Ie 6r. r, ,t.. "'./s:h br.
", e:L. t:.: "." t!), 's t J., p ,. ,(
~~, (-:.:6 I1-;a.Oo.1 2~',
~" CO~,. U:a..D c:1 t 3" 5 ~
SAMPLE TYPE
A -Aug.r cutting.
S -2-0.0. 1.315-I.D. Itrlv' aample
U -3· O.D. 2."2-LD. tub. umple
T -3-0.0. thln-w.lI.es Sh.lby lub.
n. ~
IJ E JACOBS EN3INEERING GROUP INC,
A.DV4HC1D &TIn", DMSIOH.A.LIUQUUQUI O'UATIOt('
BOREHOLE LOG Page~of'=: • LOCI-. ilON MAP: SITE 10: CL I V~ LOCATION ID:SU:-201· f.f ~ APPROX. SITE COORDINATES (ft.): . I N E _______ _
GROUND ELEVATION (ft. MSL): _____ _ DRILLING METHOD: __________ _
DRILLER: _____________ _ DATESTARTED: ____________________ ___
OATECOMPLETED: __________________ __
FIELD REP.: _____________ _
LOCATION DESCRIPTION _____ ~ ___ ~ ___ ~ _____ ~ ____ ~ SITE CONDITION ___________________________ _
/f1t...-CL
A .. Auger cuUlng.
VISUAL CLASS.: DENSITY. COLOR, S
PLASTICITY. CONDITIO
SIt.. T Y CLA Y/ 5(p""e ~ ~d, -CDA rs;e-Y"'~F-'
li()j. -r,,;41,/ v. ST. /,.,..,e. ak,A I t:I./,..~ .I'.z;
It, O,."s.h'-'1""1 H..!.,k: ;.!.,.o-t;./jIJ.)
.{;/",." J ~D HI L II. h II r,( C (;J. /, '& J"e, &) (!,. ~,t-
ST(J,oPe~ Ak~e.12! 1'47 S,,:
STo/'PE..D Srl,v/JLC K ,d,
!SIS" .
SAMPLE TYPE
6 .. 2· 0.0. ,.~e-1.0. drive .ample
u -,. 0.0. 2.42-LD. lube Hmple
T .. S-0.0. thln-•• lled 6helby tube
•
•
•
LOCAL STRATIGRAPHY AND WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY
SITE: ENVIROCARE OF UTAH, SOUTH CLIVE
COORDINATES: SUB" Sec. 32, T1S, R11U, N 3971.00 E 1267.00
(fro. SU corner)
DATE COftPLETED: Unknown (Ci rca 1984)
UELL NO.: SLC-201
AQUIFER: UpperDOst
SUPERVISED BY: Unknown (Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc., was associated with the project.)
LOCAL
STRATIGRAPHY
AND
UELL SCREEN
PLACE"ENT
--Yell
Screen
JOB NO. 2352
Elevation of reference point *
Height of reference point
above ground surface
4274.60
1.58 ft
Depth of surface seal Unknown
Type of surface seal: Unknown
I.D. of surface casing 6.0"
Type of surface casing: GALVANIZED STEEL
Depth of surface casing Unknown
I.D. of riser pipe 2.0·
Type of riser pipe: Sch. 40 PVC
Dia.eter of borehole
Type of filler: Unknown
Elev./depth of top of seal
Type of seal: Unknown
Type of gravel pack: SAND PACK
Elev./depth of top of gravel pack
Elevation depth of top of screen
Description of screen: Unknown
I.D. of screen section
Elev./depth of botte. of screen
Elev./depth of botte. of gravel pack
Elev./depth of botte. of plugged
blank section
Type of filler below plugged section: UNKNOUN
Unknown
Unknown
4236.52
4233.02
2.0·
4223.02
4221.02
4223.02
Elevation of botte. of borehole 4221.02
* All elevations are in feet above .ean sea level.
FIGURE 111-26
•
•
•
MONITORING WELL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION WORKSHEET
SLC-201
1. Honitoring Well Design
A. SLC·201 was designed according to the infor .. tion on the well construction su ... ry sheet.
II. Drilling "ethads
A. "ethad. The well was drilled (bored) using a hollow-stem auger.
B. Drilling Fluids. Unknown.
C. Fluids Analysis. Unknown.
D. Equip.ent Cleaning. Unknown.
E. COilprelled Air. Unknown.
F. Potentiaaetric Surface. Unknown at the time of drilling.
G. Forlllttion SllIIPLes.
1. CoLLection of Samples. Core samples were collected at varying intervals. See the Jacobs
Engineering Borehole Log sheets.
2. Sampling "ethads. Samples were obtained with a 3" O.D. thin-walled Shelby tube and a 211
O.D. 1.3811 I.D. drive sample.
3. Collection Intervals. Unknown, possibly continuous. See the borehole log •
4. Chnical/Physical Tests. Unknown.
III. Honitoring Well Construction "aterials
A. SIIturated Zone Pri .. ry Casing. Unknown.
B. Protective Casing. The well ;s protected with a 6u -diameter galvanized steel casing.
C. Screen. Unknown. The screen is presumed to be a 2"-diameter PVC screen.
D. Stealll Cleaning. Unknown.
IV. Well Intake Design and Well Developaent
A. Screen. Unknown.
B. Filter Pack. Unknown.
C. Well DeveLopIIent. Unknown.
V. Annular Space Seals, Aprons, Locks
A. Well Seal. The well casing is fitted with a chain which is locked with a padlock to prevent
tallpering •
, ,
i
,
!
r:-fE JACC>aS EN3-INEERING GROUP ~C. ~ ADVAHC1D nanw, D'V'~ION. ALIUQUIIQUI O"IU.TIONS
.
"'E~7 C!.~"V
BOREHOLE LOG
A SITE 10' C.t.-IOE'"
Page.L of 2::­
LOCATION 10·SIL -21>;.-if .. W APPROX. SITe COORDINATES (ft.):
N E
4~c, !:'" GROUND ELEVATION (ft. MS~
k ~c.. DRILLING METHOD: re. "/~" ~. iI1.
A , (..1C.c" DRILLER: j:: J"f7"q /2 r" "V G e ACt'~ss ,.. ~ DA TE STARTED: :;"/3/t¥
eo. 010. TE COMPLETED: ~ I "S / ~ 1./ . FIELD REP.: i!!. C;;'("'" I r rl
I~~I ~ ZC .,. 1l ']A '3 J GROUNDWATER LEVELS
@ ~ .~ DATE TIME DEPTH (ft.)
kt1(D ~?O& *p'1
:2./31 K II I f.Jrry 2.(,'
1.'/ L I '''' //:~_115 i*7 I?? ~. 2.;
. . I . " , LOCATION DESCRIPTIc:t: ""'" I'!S' 00 E: OF Ace £.!::S ~ D . l ....,... 'I ()Cl::J S. of Je>. K
SITE CONDITION l E:.' >/'Uow.
DEPTH SAMPLE UNIFIED VISUAL CLASS.: DENSITY. COLOR. STRENGTH,
(ft.) . :NT. TYPE ID SOIL CLASS. PLASTICITY. CONDITION, ETC •
L" CLAY" !:.Cw-e. c;;,·/c".sl /.'-e. -c"",,{ "'-,,'" tI/
CL-• /J.:;: / t/ Ie .6r. "L.,I.l· V. "..,",".t:r
~ SAIJI";> f,-teel v.{!.-q" .. tI,I r:o-e. _f2../.-CctllSl! c-~/ T ~ ..,;. -rl" ~"/. I4r( II. ;..#~ £. -a. _-1../ All> It.. ,..hh.-.. l/' Sf> . " ;I " V 6r, ,",ole· ,"~"£';' .,r:.,.,..., , 15p -"
~ "ge: ,.",,,,,,, #4).',rg SANDy tD.eAYEJ.
/ .... T -/,,,.-QrJ ... '-d/. ,.",,/,t, J /J. ~ ~ II, S''' J .. ~
--/ SIL7,Y,CLAY/ S;(</;';)"I/. ~-?r~.I."
S s{./'·",t!-C4'uY ;' #/':>-/(>.w.) P::l: J': Ii. 6r. -
1:::-"Y" IO~':~./ S:M If. ,.J~/' -6r. ",,-Ie. ~t'''ST .,t'..,-'.2~ - . I' .....,
~ // I eMf, o:t.I ..... e -c_M, 1-/.. r.:r; /i .1". -
If 61«:$1-, -{!"~/',,de ".,&»s:'I; ~.eI .;:,.-.
Zo S
~ t?·,. .. IC: 11~<:: _ct,~~I''''I7% €IL T)' CLAY,IUe.t:!-v 2'!> (21)
c~ 1/. P-I. I 3 oS £/ -:s ~ oS I
c; " c.L. Z:;, ~ "HP.I~ .
• . (21&-)
~/
.30 i
SAMPLE TYPE .
A ... Aug.r cutting. U ... I-O.D. 2 •• 12-LD. tub. Nmple
s ... ,. O.D. 1.IS-I.D. drive ... ",ple T ... I-0.0. thln-willid Sh.lby tub.
" "
JACOBS EN31NEERING GROUP INC.
ADVAHCID "I"',tS DIVISIOf<. ALtUQUltQUI O'IUTIOHS • BOREHOLE lOG
LOCI-. TION MAP; I. SITE 10: CLIve LOCATION 10: S"LC-2L>7.&+ ~ APPROX. SITE COORDINATES (It.): N E _______ _
GROUND ELEVATION (ft. MSL): _____ _
DRILLING METHOD: _________ _
DRILLER: _____________ _
OATESTARTED: _________________ -------OATECOMPLETED: __________________ __
FIELD REP.: ____________ _
LOCATION DESCRIPTION~~_~_~ ________ ~ _____ ~ __ ~_~ SITE CONDITION ________________________ _
CL
A .. Auge, cuttlngl
VISUAL LASS.: OEN
PL
SA.MPLE TYPE
S .. ,. O.D. t,le-LD. drl .... umple
u -s-0.0. 2.42-I.D. lub ••• ~Ie
T .. S· 0.0. thln-wlll.d Sh.lby lub.
•
•
•
LOCAL STRATIGRAPHY AND WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY
SITE: ENVIROCARE OF UTAH, SOUTH CLIVE
COORDINATES: SLBK Sec. 32, T1S, R11W, N 3816.00 E 1557.00
(11'011 SW cornel')
DATE COHPLETED: Unknown (Circa 1984)
"ELL NO.: SLC-202
AQUIFER: Uppermost
SUPERVISED BY: Unknown (Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc., was associated with the project.)
LOCAL
STRATIGRAPHY
AND
WELL SCREEN
PLACEPIENT
L..--il,,'l
Icr.."
JOB NO. 2352
Elevation of reference point *
Height of reference point
above ground surface
Depth of surface seal
Type of surface seal: Unknown
I.D. of surface casing
Type of surface casing: GALVANIZED STEEL
Depth of surface casing
I.D. of riser pipe
Type of riser pipe: Sch. 4Q PVC
Diaaeter of borehole
Type of filler: Unknown
Elev./depth of top of seal
Type of seal: Unknown
Type of gravel peck: SAND PACK
ELev./depth of top of gravel peck
ELevation depth of top of screen
Description of screen: Unknown
1.0. of screen section
ELev./depth of bottQl of screen
Elev./depth of bottQl of gravel peck
Elev./depth of bottQl of plugged
bLank section
Type of fi Uer below plugged section: UNKNOWN
Elevation of bottQl of borehoLe
4273.72
1.21 ft
unknown
6.0"
Unknown
2.0"
Unknown
Unknown
4236.01
4232.51
2.0"
4222.51
4220.51
4222.51
4220,51
* All elevations are in feet above ean sea level.
FIGURE 111-27
•
•
•
MONITORING WELL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION WORKSHEET
SLC-202
I. Konitoring Well Design
A. SLC-202 was designed according to the information on the well construction SUDlary sheet.
II. Drilling Methods
A. Method. The well was drilled (bored) using a hollow-stem auger.
B. Drilling Fluids. Unknown.
C. Fluids Analysis. Unknown.
D. Equ;pllent Cleaning. Unknown.
E. CoIIpressed Air. Unknown.
F. Potentiometric Surface. Unknown at the time of drilling.
G. Forlllltion samples.
1. Collection of Samples. Core samples were collected at varying intervals. See the Jacobs
Engineering Borehole Log sheets.
2. sampling Methods. samples were obtained with 8 3" 0.0. thin-walled Shelby tube and a 2"
0.0. 1.38" 1.0. drive sample.
3. Collection Intervals. Unknown, possibly continuous. See the borehole log •
4. Chemical/Physical Tests. Unknown.
III. Monitoring Well Construction Materials
A. saturated Zone Prillllry Casing. Unknown.
B. Protective Ca.ing. The well 1s protected with a 6"-diameter galvanized steel casing.
C. Screen. Unknown. The screen is presUllled to be a 2M-diameter PVC screen.
D. Ste811 Cleaning. Unknown.
IV. Well Intake Design and Well Development
A. Screen. Unknown.
B. Filter Pack. Unknown.
C. Wetl DevelOpilent. Unknown.
V. Annular Space Seals, Aprons, Locks
A. Well Seal. The well casing is fitted with • chain which is locked with a padlock to prevent
tallpering •
I ! E ~coas EN(;INEERING GROUP INC. \i ADVANCID Innw, DIVIIION, ALIU.U.lUQUI OPlunotu
JiOREHOLE LOG Pageiof .E:-
SITE 10: C/../ VC: LOCATION ID:<;tC-203-~ + LoeA TI01MAP; . ~
j ~~ ~ APPROX. SITE COORDINATES (fl.):
t I r~c/,;t:r,c.. N E I I. I GROUND ELEVATION (ft. MSL)' ,e. , (
A",c:Q,t'JD ( DRILLING METHOD: (;! 5/,8:'" N· ~ . ;z; .
DRILLER: F /1'7;t:?.e T/..v E' ~
Ac~t;S DATE STARTED: :z.7"'lv~
'1C' !:> ... -DA TE COMPLETED : ~:.z.t ~
FIELD REP.: e.. ".., / r:
j 'J. f) t .s '" ;a. tJ. '2J) J GROUNDWATER LEVELS
~ •• ~~~'~ ,"l2 DATE TIME DEPTH (ft.)
:z. / 1-/ tK c,.t !5 "a,.,..., ;;l./ '"
~I/~ /t;4I' I/':JL) .-:;".., :u-.~, (+)
LOCA TION DESCRIPTION ,.". :2 00(> I' !£' 0;: A c.£. E ~t.;: ;;;> 1:>, I "'L.:c. 1'0 t2. ' S. 0)': .e-. ,..
,~I ~1'IIJS>w > SITE CONDITION
DEPTH SAMPLE UNIFIED VISUAL CLASS.: DENSITY. COLOR. STRENGTH.
(ft'> INT. TYPE 10 SOIL CLASS. PLASTICITY. CONDITION. ETC.
O. .s eLI? y~ "",,',?Dr ':;;"/-1-1 sr. /.. -t! -CI ••. J""f.,,~ /'-.. S'/NJ • (25) ~ fJ..I 1//' II: ,....,1sJ,. ~ yl.,~J. /:". ,~c ~ s/ ""'1:",' 'J
I! r,.,., M t! l-s -I1dc: Ct.~-",,,,? ro dpy/~ r~ft: !:>. 'X 3'2-"2.. .. ('f ) bl'": -''''~yJ W1",,~~ ~e>fT / 3·5"-B·5/
i I eI. ~ I I't! .. k:: <;bnte 'lY"t:JG.V' ~ t; """" 5 .
/0",.",><, s
SA#t>'/ r;;:rl {'.. -",p&l ft',,~ (1,-/ /.· ... e.-'-"Ie; ..... (2') CL-ML c--IJ. . PI VI It. h,... 1i H. ylw.t.; ... , I
S.
br. 'Jp -Ie: ntl),', t, (..,..,....,
I~ ~ ~.N·z:s SILl:. SAND, .f. -"'<lUI. ~,.J~ ~/. ~"7/,, (s~) ,S'~1 s-l. / ... e -CI-rl td./ Ali> V. /1. 61": i; If. yl..,r,J, -
Cr. ,. d C': mOl 't:T tI~ t·,.--. s; I
/Df,.J
20 I~ rt,'L>-'J CL S/t-71 CLAY,! s-l j.·,."e-('IN I~ Itf~../ PJ; v. /,J, 1.::::: ___ .(2~) br. n.de : I"t'7 " • 'r I ~ r-, ,
SAN!> tI. .f!,. q"'#1"1 sf: / .. -~-(1"'-1""-AIr .,.. sp 7~~ ...:. 1// 1.//·'5 r./r:;:A -bl"': ,.,.d~:~#W4:C.f, ../),.,,,.., IL :::. (u.,)
• ~_i--
3a
SAMPLE TYPE . .
A .. Auger cuttlngl U -,-0..0. 2.e:· LD. lube &ample
S .. 2· 0.0. 1.3'-LO. Clrln .ample T -3-OJ). thln-wl1lees Shelby tube
fL 1 ~
:Jr JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. • ---.;;..;;.. A.DVANe,£) ITITUU DIV.II0H, ALaUCluUClUI O''',,'IONI
BOREHOLE LOG Pag.d.of .3
SITE 10: CLI U€' LOCA TION MAP: ,., LOCATION ID:S7lC-21~·i~ '" w APPROX. SITE COORDINATES (ft.):
N E
GROUND ELEVATION (ft. MSL);
DRILLING METHOD:
DRILLER:
~ .. DATE STARTED: . OA TE COMPLETED:
FIELD REP.:
GROUNDWATER LEVELS
DATE TIME OE~THUt.>-
LOCATION DESCRIPTION .
SITE CONDITION
OfiPTH SAM~LE UNIFIED VISUAL CLASS.: DENSITY. COLOR. STRENGTH,
t.) INT. ITYPE 10 SOIL CLASS. PLASTICITY. CONDITION, ETC.
~O .~ :5 CLAY, Sf t·-e. -CHtr~~ 1-/.-?_Z; If Y/IV'i," -'" 1~·3-'i -~rj:.1 * yll4)';" -I:.r. "dl,' ,-r,o.· ... i t;;~f-("0
~S-' S CI~ /1~/e. ().h6 *" I,,. '" it S "71 Cl.AYIt.. rv 1.;"5 to -(d-.. ~ (,,) CL bI ~ ,sh -frnsJ.,. ~~)' t'JT hr n:;h. -?t "'7) r--
'---/Jrn?) ~r.s'-'1g.s~
'10 s 'Y1e, cJ,":/"nl -n S'lt 71 c.:.Py. <::4"1!! ~ Fl'G-a
~(u,) l/ . .,4 t;;;'" ,. I W V. -/11 f I, r/c'( -br. /
(:-,..,....,., ~¥. S '-SI-5 I
S ,,~--""-/ "-~f.·/2.. ~,. ST'DI'PEl> ,4"GE-~ l'7 (u) ,
60,
S...,..."PPl;.D C;:f'1n-? rL e:; k> "'7 I ,I .. ~ ,
s ;,,,) ~ ....
~O r--...: " ~=t."C
--
•
SAMPLE TYPE .
.. A .. AuDe, cutting • U .. ,-0.0. 2.4Z· LO. lube .. ~ae
& .. 2-0.0. 1.,e-1.0. drln .. ",pie T -,-0.0. thln-w.lled Shelb)' tube
•
•
•
LOCAL STRATIGRAPHY AND WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY
SITE: ENVIROCARE Of UTAH, SOUTH CLIVE
COORDINATES: SLBH Sec. 32, T1S, R11~, N 3684.00 E 2337.00
(frOil S~ corner)
DATE COHPLETED: Unknown (Circa 1984)
~ELL NO.: SLC-203
AQUIFER: Uppermost
-SUPERVISED BY: Unknown (Jacoba_Engineering Group, Inc., was associated with the project.)
LOCAL
STRATIGRAPHY
AND
WELL SCREEN
PLACE"ENT
JOB NO. 2352
ELevation of reference point *
Height of reference point
above ground surface
Depth of surface seal
Type of surface seal: Unknown
1.0. of surface casing
Type of surface casing: GALVANIZED STEEL
Depth of surface casing
1.0. of riaer pipe
Type of riser pipe: sch. 40 PVC
Dia .. ter of borehole
Type of filler: Unknown
Elev./depth of top of seal
Type of sea l: Unknown
Type of gravel pack: SAND PACK
Elev./depth of top of gravel pack
Elevation depth of top of screen
Description of screen: Unknown
I.D. of screen section
Elev./depth of botta. of acreen
Elev./depth of bottOil of gravel pack
Elev./depth of bottOil of plugged
blank section
Type of fi Uer below plugged section: UNKHOYN
Elevation of botta. of borehole
1,277.30
'.30 ft
Unknown
6.0"
UnKnown
Unknown
Unknown
4238.50
4236.00
2.0·
4226.00
4224.00
4226.00
t All elevations are in feet above .ean sea level.
FIGURE III-28
•
•
•
MONITORING WELL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION WORKSHEET
SLC-203
I. Monitoring Well Design
A. SLC-203 was designed according to the information on the well construction summary sheet.
II. Drilling Methods
A. Method. The well was drilled (bored) using a hollow-stem auger.
B. Drilling Fluids. Unknown.
C. Fluids Analysis. Unknown.
O. Equipaent Cleaning. Unknown.
E. Co.pressed Air. Unknown.
F. Potentioaetric Surface. Unknown at the time of drilling.
G. Formation Samples.
1. CoUection of Salllples. Core s_ples were collected at varying intervals. See the Jacobs
Engineering Borehole Log sheets.
2. Salllpling Methods. Salllples were obtained with a 3" 0.0. thin-walled Shelby tube and a 2"
O.D. 1.38-1.0. drive sample.
3. Collection Intervals. Unknown, possibly continuous. See the borehole log .
4. Chemical/Physical Tests. Unknown.
III. Monitoring Well Construction Materials
A. Saturated Zone Priary Casing. Unknown.
B. Protective Casing. The well is protected with a 6"-diameter galvanized steel casing.
C. Screen. Unknown. The screen is presuaed to be a 2"-diameter PVC screen.
O. Steam Cleaning. Unknown.
IV. well Intake Design and Well Developaent
A. Screen. Unknown.
B. Fi lter Pack. Unknown.
C. Well Oevelopaent. Unknown.
V. Annular Space Seals, Aprons, Locks
A. Well Seal. The weLL casing is fitted with a chain which ;s locked with a padlock to prevent
tallpering .
fJI JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC.
A.DVANCID InTIWI DIVlS.IOK, ALIVRUItRUl O'IIAT,OtII • BOREHOLE LOG PageLof 3:-
.OCATION AP; A SITE ID:CLn.lE LOCATION to: ~-2£7'. f~ IiII
Jv4ii'¢7e w APPROX. SITE COORDINATES (ft.):
N E ~A GROUND ELEVATION C/· MSL)R f ~ ';4c~~ DRILLING METHOD: .. ~.. . • A.
AJL /;! 'c:.. DRILLER: F. rn ~ I! r, IV e ~ <JAf.o DATE STARTEO: ';2 I I 7 g.:"4.1
ACu.9i -DATE COMPLETE~.. ~ I i /,,-.;l
FIELD REP.: • SAot",r,W'
2.'0, ~2-03 "~2-0' d-~ z. I GROUNDWATER LEVELS e (!) ~ DATE TIME DEPTH (ft.)
';1.. / I / ~ "I--.:2 p,....., 2L. ,. ~(.l;~ W~ @UJc, .'2..</~'lfl"" ~ If(""'" ~.,. I"
LOCA TION DESCRIPTION ....v 1000' t;". ;.,c A cc. r t:.~ ,-IJ. ....... 5000 f C;:. t:!I,t;
SITE CONDITION /."S' SAlCw . ~~""'t!",., Pe:c ,-,t>c.Ie, If'
DEPTH SAMPLE UNIFIED VISUAL CLASS.: DENSITY. COLOR, STRENGTH.
(ft.) INT. TYPE 10 SOjL CLASS. PLASTICITY. CONDITION, ETC.
V "' 5 (! L.:-HL SIc.. 7r CU1/, SO""e. v f... ~ ,.~ , ... /. -s;f /.;."'-/"'0.. 3~.:r lc • (zs/ c-IJ/ /11114' p..z I J,r. -rei rl, b,. n::..../(': S/
,.,u,·~'t -I!,,.-,
J . .
S ~ -pw . __ . _.
5 CL-ML. ":x" z·;.· ~ CL4~ ,...11. -5'1' f.-t'-(1-/ ~~ ¥ P .. Z; v /I: 11*"'f. ~
(q) -Gff 'Ii w1sh. br. ,.,Jit:;.. ",'S ~ V' C; 0 It . ! ,
011 Yl>9jSfL 7t t;o-e V-'" c;.,. .. c(. _tl-r;.." I,.,.(~ --I -/0 So 't44-C:. CIMt-P'1 ;'.v f'.z; I/. If Y/K?s,< t ... "t;,/r: ~I . ~ ~'12:Z' (~:s) CL I"t1 t, .S' t~ v.,t: r '"
S " S 1'-7// C t..Aye 1. SI"1.v~ SQH 7 v ; -1'19 • :,?# •• .:I',
I~ -S.,t./"ntt'-~~,,;t /V/?-/:-, .... ;>.,r J; •.. ~' yllc.'S:':. > ....... t2~.l.6' ~3 Stt1 " / f. (S~) !.'I' At' k : sf, "" ",'s,1 ;"1:'#" ....I."IfJ!..t: . I/. ~,,/' .. /
• -~ U~~~
V,.s. .... ,J. ./
S'£'7''''''''''''7 C'vlY, s: .. 7 ; ;: !,~//sl.
;!c) ;,-,.., ~ -(' -{. ;;-;, uI f>..z; f"'" f 71' r rp ( Ore-Ie", , -' C ($0'-~ I'1t~" sf /.,:-",.c7'· ./,-r" , 'If ~. . /.-~ 'Cll -ok CJ.'H,-:;/JS/'-TYCJ..A~h':lJ". II.~ c..(·l
s , "r-.. '.iJr.,,! , .j)r,." t;1,.,.rt./l..'I'.,.2';-'<fI.s.S~ .. ~~.
Zs-H(..k: C""'7;''-::~ 'bAf/,t/. r.r;, H.tJ£.r,t, ,;; "-./' i'·':-/2..-
-('l.'f-) !''''SI..!,,;, !,.,/ Il r-/ ,~'~.=; .2P',~'-'f53.5:
•
,
/ ----._---
&. SO , SAMPLE TYPE . . . It. ... Au"er cuUln". U .... O.C. 2A2-I.C. tube "'note
S ... 2-O.C. t.38-I.C. Cfrlve .. ",pie T ..... OJ), thln-walled Shelby tube
[) , I:;
..
I
,
•
g:r JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC . • ADVolNCID nltu", DIV1510H. ALIUQUUQUI O~UolTIOHS
BOREHOLE LOG Pagedof .:2-.
LOCA TION MAP; #. SITE 10: C'-I &It:: LOCATION 10: StL'-ZoY-bt' ~ I-.l APPROX. SITE COORDINATES (ft.):
N E . GROUND ELEVATION (ft. MSL):
DRILLING METHOD:
DRILLER:
. DATE STARTED:
DA TE COMPLETED:
FIELD REP.:
GROUND~AT~R LEVELS
DA-.IE TJM;. DEPTH (It.)
l
t LOCATION DESCRIPTION .
SITE CONDITION
DEPTH SAMPLE UNIFIED VISUAL CLASS.: ~t~~~~hCy~Lgo~;lirJ~.GJ-rc. (ft.) INT IIYPl;. ill SOIL CLASS. .0 Y .s SI/...71' I' c t....4 Y clS)/ If! C; / sr h ""e-C' I'H -I &'/./ a ""1-1.
(10) AlI~ ". hi, . -br. /'f de: """ I'~ ,; I!. r ~
5 --
5.$'" "X ;".£.1(; STor'r~P ,:Jt-('6G e... tI .. (to SIl1 ~/ "r.5~.
S70.,oP£c. 'SF1",pL' C /"~ H7 ~/.~~ ,
'10 s I /
"/13-,5' " I
L":"', ('0) I !
sl I
'lS-I
.~ iCf -,"I-lo I I
I}~u) i
,
.-
S I
So 'V 1;1~~~'f I' : ---
•
SAMPLE TYPE . .
A -Au".r cutting_ U .. s· O.D. 2.42-I.D. Sub •• ample
6 .. 2-O.D. 1.'S-LD. drlv. aa"'ple . T" S· 0.0. thtn-wa".1S Sh.lby Sub.
•
•
•
.'
LOCAL STRATIGRAPHY AND WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY
SITE: ENVIROCARE OF UTAH, SOUTH CLIVE
COORDINATES: SLBK Sec. 32, T1s, R11W, H 2144.00 E 1283.00
(frOll SII corner)
DATE COftPLETED: Unknown (Ci rca 1984)
WELL NO.: SLC-204
AQUIFER: Upper.ast
SUPERVISED BY: Unknown (Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc., was associated with the project.)
LOCAL
STRATIGRAPHY
AND
YELL SCREEN
PLACEMENT
--ilALl
Screen
JOB NO. 2352
Elevation of reference point *
Height of reference point
above ground surface
Depth of surface seal
Type of surface seal: Unknown
1.0. of surface casing
Type of surface casing: GALVANIZED STEEL
Depth of surface casing
1.0. of riser pipe
Type of riser pipe: Seh. 40 PVC
Diameter of borehole
Type of filler: Unknown
Elev./depth of top of seal
Type of sea l : Unknown
Type of gravel paelt: SAND PACK
Elev./depth of top of gravel pack
Elevation depth of top of aereen
Description of screen: Unknown
1.0. of acreen aeetion
Elev./depth of bot tOIl of aereen
Elev./depth of bottOll of gravel pack
Elev./depth of bonOll of plugged
blank aeetion
Type of filler below plugged aeetion: UHKNOIIH
Elevation of bottOll of borehole
4273.19
1.41 ft
Unknown
6.0"
Unknown
2.0"
Unknown
Unknown
4237.28
4231.78
2.0"
4221.78
4219.78
4221.78
4219.78
* All elevations are in feet above IH8Il aea level.
FIGURE· III-29
•
•
•
MONITORING WELL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION WORKSHEET
SLC-204
I. Monitoring Well Design
A. SLC-204 was designed according to the inforaation on the well construction su..ary aheet.
II. Drilling Methods
A. Method. The well was drilled (bored) using a hollow-stem auger.
B. Drilling Fluids. Unknown.
C. Fluids Analysis. Unknown.
D. Equipllent Cleaning. Unknown.
E. Ca.pressed Air. Unknown.
F. Potentia.etric Surface. Unknown at the time of drilling.
G. Foraation Samples.
1. CoLLection of SalllPles. Core sallples were collected at varying intervals. See the Jacobs
Engineering Borehole Log sheets.
2. Sampling Methods. Samples were obtained w;th D 3" 0.0. thin-walled Shelby tube and a 2"
O.D. 1.38" 1.0. drive sample.
3. Collection Intervals. Unknown, possibly continuous. See the borehole log •
4. Chemical/Physical Tests. Unknown.
III. Konitoring Well Construction Katerials
A. Saturated Zone Pri.ry casing. Unknown.
B. Protective Casing. The well is protected with a 6u-diameter galvanized steel casing.
C. Screen. Unknown. The screen ia presumed to be a 2M-diameter PVC screen.
D. It ... Cleen1ng. Unknown.
IV. Well Intake Design and Well DevelOpilent
A. Screen. Unknown.
B. Fi lter Pack. Unknown.
c. Well Developllent. unknown.
V. AMular Spece Seals, Aprons, Locks
A. Well Seal. The well casing is fitted with a chain which is locked with a padlock to prevent
tallpering •
U ~t JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC.
ADVANCED nln .. s OIVlSION, AlaUtilUUQU( O'IUTtO+CS
BOREHOLE LOG Page L of 2-
-----~---------. SITE 10: (}L/lC LOCATION 10~(J-2aS-BY !!J. APPROX. SITE COORDINATES (ft.):
10
N E ______________ __
GROUND ELEVATION!fl.-MSl):--=_~ _____ _
DRILLING METHOD: ~ .:><1?" tI· S' ' 1"7 •
DRILLER: F ;11Al~ /1"A..It!. "'i::.
DATE STARTED: :2 L *' 2 £. ~
DA TE COMPLETED : '~7 'i 7 i lzI
FIELD REP.: t:!..';: , ;;:'7 I>-? -If rt"{ ~s:.
i(':'
, .--
UNIFIED
SOil CLASS.
VISUAL SS.: DENSITY. CUL"-I"
PLASTICITY CO
SAMPLE TYPE
A .. AuDer cutting.
S .. 2· 0.0. 1.'1-LD. drive .ample
R-17
u .. ,. 0.0. 2."2-1.0. tub. "fllPle
T .. ,-0.0. thin-.all.d Sh.lby tub.
4[ JACOBS ~INEERING GROUP INC. • ADVA.HCID ITlTlMS DfVISIOH. AL'UQUUQUI O'UATtOHI .., "'I BOREHOLE LOG P age'.:.. c f .:::::-
LOCATION 10: SLc-2A5'~~ LOeA TlON MAP; " SITE 10; CJ./(,)ff!" III ~ APPROX. SITE COORDINATES (ft.);
N E . GROUND ELEVATION (ft. MSL):
DRILL~NG METHOD:
DRILLER: -, DA TE STARTED: -DATE COMPLETED:
FIELD REP.:
~c;80~AI El1 LE Y~LS
D~ ~ _DQTH (it.)
LOCATION DESCRIPTION .
SITE CONDITION
DEPTH SAMPLE UNIFIED VISUA.L CLASS.: DENSITY. COLOR. STRENGTH, (ft.) ! INT. ITYPE 10 SOIL CLASS. PLASTICITY. CONDITION ETC.
50 "V" s I'1o-le. '7"..ov"'~t.Vi?'1~r a f so ~ i/ -... 1/-2-3
(S) CUJ. /lJ!.:t!;?: ettA'''!:''' D ~ S/i-tyC,t..I1y sr. ;'~t'-
C'w-{d/ wd-#,tf P.:z: 6/""',,,h • t!'7 Jt If.
S:s .s CL
V' 2'1-',';-hr. Ii sI ,..,1r'h br. !'3'· !'?, OS' 'iJ.S'-",.?fj/ .. '''I / / .
1(*) SANi>)/S,,-': 57'. /.',.,e-aHl~ AI~nLrA-
'to So br. pe!{t:.; //. "., tJ,:S'; ,I!'r"""?
"x.'" IF' f·-:r-/'
(15)
fY'IL STf?r'Pep ,tic'" (;t. 12. ;tt' -;-r: tJ I V -,
l.f!:. s c;roPPt..,O s;-,., ,-n Pt. Ii 12. ,4 '/ .t:; I. C ~ IV" ~~z ~
S Sf) ............ £-10 .,~ bq )
-
.
SAMPL.E TYPE
A .. Aug.r cuttlnga U .. S· 0.0. 2.·C2· 1.0. lub ••• mple
S .. 2· 0.0. ,.:,.5· I.D ... rlv •• ample T .. S· 0.0. thln-wall.d Sh.lby tub.
•
•
•
LOCAL STRATIGRAPHY AND WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY
SITE: EHVIROCARE OF UTAH, SOUTH CLIVE
COORDINATES: SUB" Sec. 32, T1S, R11U, H 2339.00 E 1649.00
(frOil SU corner)
DATE COItPLETED: Unknown (Circa 1984)
UELL NO.: SLC-2OS
AQUIFER: Upper.ost
SUPERVISED BY: Unknown (Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc., was associated with the project.)
LOCAL
STRATIGRAPHY
AND
YELL SCREEN
PLACE"ENT
* ... -.~ Pack
Ic,....,
JOB NO. 2352
Elevation of reference point *
Height of reference point
above ground lurface
'275.44
1.56 ft
Depth of lurface leal Unknown
Type of surface leal: Unknown
1.0. of surface casing 6.0"
Type of surface casing: GALVANIZED STEEL
Depth of lurface casing Unknown
1.0. of riser pipe 2.0"
Type of riser pipe: Sch • .40 PVC
Dia.eter of borehole
Type of filler: Unknown
Elev./depth of top of seal
Type of sea l: Unknown
Type of gravel pack: SAND PACK
Elev./depth of top of gravel pack
Elevation depth of top of screen
Delcription of screen: Unknown
1.0. of screen section
Elev./depth of bottOli of screen
Elev./depth of bottOli of gravel pack
Elev./depth of bot tOIl of plugged
blank section
Type of f1 ller below plugged section: UNKNOWN
Unknown
Unknown
10238.88
04233.88
2.0"
04223.38
04221.38
04223.38
Elevation of bott~ of borehole 4221.38
* All elevations are in feet above ..an sea level.
FIGURE III-30
•
•
•
MONITORING WELL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION WORKSHEET
SLC-205
1. Monitoring Well Design
A. SLC-2OS was designed according to the inforaation on the well construction ~ .. ry sheet.
II. Drilling Methods
A. Method. The well was drilled (bored) using a hollow-ste~ auger.
B. Drilling Fluids. Unknown.
C. Fluids Analysis. Unknown.
D. EquiplHHlt Cleaning. Unknown.
E. Ca.pressed Air. Unknown.
F. Potentio.etric SUrface. Unknown at the ti.e of drilling.
G. Forution Sllllples.
1. Collection of Samples. Core samples were collected at varying intervals. See the Jacobs
Engineering Borehole Log sheets.
2. SampUng Methods. Samples were obtained with a 3" O.D. thin-walled Shelby tube and a 2"
O.D. 1.38" I.D. drive sample.
3. Collection Intervals. Unknown, possibly continuous. See the borehole log •
4. Cheaical/Physical Tests. Unknown.
III. Monitoring Well Construction Materials
A. Saturated Zone Priaary Casing. Unknown.
B. Protective Casing. The well ;. protected with a 6"-dia.ter galvanized steel casing.
C. Screen. Unknown. The screen is presuaed to be a 2"-dia.ter PVC screen.
D. Stea. Cleaning. Unknown.
IV. Well Intake Design and Well DevelOplHHlt
A. Screen. Unknown.
B. Filter Pack. Unknown.
C. Well DevelopHnt. Unknown.
V. Annular Space Seals, Aprons, Locks
A. Well Seal. The well casing is fitted with a chain which is locked with a padlock to prevent
ta..,.ring •
rifE JACOBS EN(;rNEERING GROU? INC. ~ ADVANCED IY.nMS DIVIIIOH.AUUQUttQUI O"'UTIOHS
BOREHOLE LOG Pagel.of.k-.
MAP: ~ SITE 10: (2LIVE" LOCATION ID:C;;L.C-ZD~· i4
1AI~.s7et!JcJ w Af'PROX. SrTE COORDINATES (ft.):
rl--tj::~';:':":~=+---.jL--J N E ---------GROUND ELEVATION (ft. MSL): DRILLING METHOD: (p % .. H ~s:-. A""--. ----
DRILLER: • ",..,14R:,.r,.A/ Eo r
DATESTARTED: __ ~~~~g~ ____________ _
DATE COMf'LETED :~~~~"-____ _
FJELD REP.: _..-.1l0000.0. __ ...;.;..;...:.....;:....;..;.. _____ _
LOCATION DESCRIPTION ....".,2~' e, 01= fleet!!::. ss: k-C> .• .....".... Se>c::o' s. of
SITE CONDITION (.51' SI'IfOU:S. IV IC.
'.
I •
S"
30
A -Au".r cutting.
VISUAL v ... r\.ol
SA u(>y,Ct.IIy_ Y SII •. -r; st. /''#'144 ... a...1-''j /"c,..)
Rr-AI~ v. It. 6,. tr It. yIMJs/,.-hr.
n.de ; M"s. t; fI . .(,' r"""
SAMPLE TYPE
Ii .. 2' 0.0. 1,3S' LO. CItrin •• mpl,
u -,-0.0. 2.U-LO. tub ... mple
T .... OJ), thtn-wa"ed Shelby tub.
8-19
JACOBS Et\G!NEERING GROUP lNC.
ADVANCID IYCnMI DIV"IOH, ALIUQU!tQUI O"IATIOHI
POREHOl.E LOG Page ~Of ...;-• L-O-C-A.-T-l-O-N-M-A-P-:-------'::"""...., SITE 10: (!..u ()c: LOCA TION 10: SIL-za-s
l!J APPROX. SITE COORDINATES (ft.): N E _______ _
GROUND ELEVATION (ft. MSL): _____ _ DRILLING METHOD: _________ _
ORILLER: _____________ _
OATESTARTED: __________________ ___
DATE COMPLETED: _________ _
FIELD REP.: ____________ _
LOCATION DESCR'PTION ____ ~ ____ ~ __ ~_~ ___ ~ __ ~~_~
SITE CONDITION __________________________ _
A .. Auoe, cuttino.
VISUAL CLASS.: OENSlTY. CO •
PLASTICITY C.
s" 'I etA 11 S-r'. "'mf!.-a-'1.',/ ;/1 p..z; It •
hll4/sJ., ,"'''y ~e: """ •• ·se:, ./!-,.--.
CL.I:l 'h Sf: /,.-~ -tf-{.,[/ 1/. ?.r11t., y/ws,A, -
1"#/ ~.!.l,t: ",()",~ ,t!·r,....,
STo"''''eb I4lA&.eta.. 147 :So I .
SAMPL.E TYPE
S .. 2· O.D. 1.'1-I.D. CSfl". •• mple
u .. •• O.D. 2.C2· LD. lub ... mple
T .. S· 0.0. thln-.alled Shllby tub.
•
•
•
UOltCHN"Al (ON\ULl"NI~ INC
LOCAL STRATIGRAPHY AND WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY
SITE: ENVIROCARE OF UTAH, SOUTH CLIVE
YELL NO.: SLC-206
COORDINATES: SLBM Sec. 32, T1S, R11Y, N 2599.00 E 2428.00
(froll SY corner)
DATE COHPLETED: Unknown (Circa 1984) AQUIFER: UpperlllOst
SUPERVISED BY: Unknown (Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc., was associated with the project.)
LOCAL
STRATIGRAPHY
AND
"ELL SCREEN
PLACE"ENT
Screen
Elevation of reference point *
Height of reference point
above ground surface
Depth of surface seal
Type of surface seal: Unknown
I.D. of surface casing
Type of surface casing: GALVANIZED STEEL
Depth of surface casing
I.D. of riser pipe
Type of riser pipe: Sch. 40 PVC
Dia .. ter of borehole
Type of filler: Unknown
Elev./depth of top of seal
Type of seal: Unknown
Type of gravel pack: SAND PACK
Elev./depth of top of gravel pack
Elevation depth of top of screen
Description of screen: Unknown
I.D. of screen section
Elev./depth of botte. of screen
Elev./depth of botte. of gravel pack
Elev./depth of botte. of plugged
blank section
Type of filler below plugged section: UNKNOUN
4275.93
, .37 ft
Unknown
6.oN
Unknown
2.0"
Unknown
Unknown
4237.06
4234.56
2.0"
4224.56
4222.56
4224.56
Elevation of botte. of borehole 4222.56
* All elevations are in feet above .een sea level.
JOB NO. 2352 FIGURE III-31
•
•
•
MONITORING WELL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION WORKSHEET
SLC-206
1. "onitoring Well Design
A. SLC-206 wa, designed according to the infor .. tion on the well construction su ... ry sheet.
11. Drilling "ethods
A. Kethod. The well was drilled (bored) using a hollow-stem auger.
B. Drilling Fluids. Unknown.
C. Fluids Analysis. Unknown.
D. Equip.ent Cleaning. Unknown.
E. Ca.pressed Air. Unknown.
F. Potentioaetric Surface. Unknown at the time of drilling.
G. For .. tion Samples.
1. Collection of Samples. Core samples were collected at varying intervals. See the Jacobs
Engineering Borehole Log sheets.
2. Sampling "ethods. Samples were obtained with a 3" O.D. thin-walled Shelby tube and a 2M
O.D. 1.38M I.D. drive sample.
3. Collection Intervals. Unknown, possibly continuous. See the borehole log.
4. Chelical/Physical Tests. Unknown.
111. Konitoring Well Construction "aterials
A. Saturated Zone Pri .. ry Casing. Unknown.
B. Protective Casing. The well is protected with a 6"-diameter galvanized steel casing.
C. Screen. Unknown. The screen is presumed to be a 2"-diameter PVC screen.
D. Steam Cleaning. Unknown.
IV. Well Intake Design and Well Develop.ent
A. Screen. Unknown.
B. Filter Pack. Unknown.
C. Well DevelopDent. Unknown.
v. Annular Space Seals, Aprons, Locks
A. Well Seal. The well casing is fitted with a chain which is locked with a padlock to prevent
tupering.