DSHW-2024-009438

1

Division of Waste Management and
Radiation Control
Solid Waste Management Program

Mailing Address Office Location Phone [phone]
P.O. Box 144880 195 North 1950 West Fax [phone]
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-488 Salt Lake City, Utah 84116 www.deq.utah.gov

APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY PERMIT TO OPERATE AN
EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION WASTE FACILITY

In 2019, the Utah Legislature made changes to the Solid and Hazardous Waste Act, Utah Code § 19-6-
101 et seq., which required jurisdiction over the disposal of Oil and Gas Exploration and Production
Waste move from the Department of Natural Resources’ Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining (DOGM) to the
Department of Environmental Quality’s Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control (DWMRC).
In preparation for this regulatory shift, DWMRC has proposed a temporary permitting mechanism for
existing Exploration and Production (E&P) facilities as defined in the proposed Utah Admin. Code R315-
301-2(22)(a).

The proposed rules state that the Director of DWMRC may issue a temporary permit for the purposes of
facilitating the owner’s or operator’s good faith transition from regulation under Utah Admin. Code R649-9
to regulation under Utah Admin. Code R315-321 or R315-322. Applications for temporary permits must
be received by the Director of DWMRC no less than 30 days before October 1, 2024. The temporary
permits will expire one year from the effective date, which is the date the financial assurance mechanism
held by DOGM is transferred to DWMRC.

To complete a temporary permit application to operate an E&P facility, an owner or operator of an existing
E&P facility must:

1. Register the company in DWMRC’s Community Portal and complete facility information within the
Community Portal.

2. Complete the attached Exploration and Production Waste Facility Temporary Permit Application
Form.

3. Provide DWMRC with the following required documentation, to the extent it has not already been
provided to DWMRC or is not already in DWMRC’s possession:
a. Facility map with each landfarm cell, landfill cell, and surface impoundment labeled;
b. Copy of Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining Permit;
c. Copy of Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining Permit Approval/Issuance Letter; and
d. Copy of Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining Bonding (financial assurance).

4. Submit the Application Form and required documentation to DWMRC through the Community
Portal Miscellaneous Document Submission.

5. Within 120 days of DWMRC’s issuance of a temporary permit, the financial assurance
mechanism held by DOGM must be transferred to DWMRC. If the Director issues a temporary
permit, it shall not become effective until the financial assurance mechanism held by DOGM is
transferred to DWMRC. An effective temporary permit is required to operate an E&P Facility
under DWMRC’s jurisdiction.
2

Exploration and Production Waste Facility Temporary Permit Application Form
I. Facility Name and Location
Name of Facility
Integrated Water Management North Blue Bench
Facility Address (Street or Directions to Facility)
20250 W 2000 S
County
Duchesne
City. Duchesne Zip Code 84021 Telephone
[phone]
Township
T2S
Range
R4W
Section
29
Quarter Section
SW
Quarter/Quarter
Section
SW
Main Gate Latitude: Longitude:
II. Existing E&P Facilities
☐ Open Landfarm Cell(s) Closed
X Evaporation Pond(s) Yes
Number of Open Landfarm Cells: 1
Number of Evaporation Ponds: 2 (2 skim ponds, 2 Evap Ponds)
III. Facilities to be Permitted by DWMRC
X Landfill Cell(s) 2 permitted Cells
X Surface Impoundment(s) 4

Number of Landfill Cells:2
Number of Surface Impoundments:4 (2 skim ponds, 3 Evap
Ponds)

III. Facility Owner(s) Information
Legal Name of Facility Owner
Integrated Water Management LLC
Mailing Address
PO Box 1068
City
Duchesne
State
UT
Zip Code
84021
Telephone
[phone]
IV. Facility Operator(s) Information
Legal Name of Facility Operator
Integrated Water Management LLC
Mailing Address
PO Box 430
City
Duchesne
State
UT
Zip Code
84021
Telephone
[phone]
V. Property Owner(s) Information
Is the property leased? NO
Name of Property Owner Integrated Water Management LLC

Mailing Address
PO Box 430
City
Duchesne
State
UT
Zip Code
84021
Telephone
[phone]
VI. Designated Contact Information
3

Facility Owner Designated Contact (if different than
above)
Russell Sorensen
Title
Operations Manager
Mailing Address
PO Box 430
City.
Duchesne
State
UT
Zip Code
8401
Telephone
[phone]
Email Address
[e-mail]

Alternative Telephone (cell phone or other)

Facility Operator Designated Contact (if different than
above)

Title

Mailing Address

City

State

Zip Code

Telephone

Email Address

Alternative Telephone (cell phone or other)

Property Owner Contact (if different than above)

Title

Mailing Address

City

State

Zip Code

Telephone

Email Address

Alternative Telephone (cell phone or other)

VII. Waste Types to be Disposed of (check all that
apply) VIII. Facility Area
X Exploration and Production wastes that are exempt from
hazardous waste rules (R315-260-4(b)(5)).

☐ Very Small Quantity Generator hazardous waste
NO Hazardous Waste
Facility Area: 90 acres

Disposal Area: 1.6 acres

IX. Application Documents
Indicate documents attached to this application (all are required):

x Facility Map with each landfarm cell, landfill cell, and surface impoundment labeled
x Copy of Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining Permit
x Copy of Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining Approval/Issuance Letter
x Copy of Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining Bonding (Financial Assurance)

1:6,000 ±
Integrated Water ManagementTempoary PermitDuchesne, UTProject Number: 751-109
Site Vicinity Map
0 300 600 900 1,200150Feet
Plate1
Copyright GeoStrata, 2024
Legend
Facilty
Evaporation Pond
Land Farm Closed
Landfill
Skim Pond
State of Utah
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
GARY R. HERBERT
Governor
SPENCER J. COX
Lieutenant Governor

MICHAEL R. STYLER
Executive Director
Division of Oil, Gas and Mining
JOHN R. BAZA
Division Director

Permit to Operate
********************
Facility Name: IWM/North Blue Bench
Facility Type: Commercial Waste Disposal Facility
Location: Section 30, Township 2S, Range 4W
County: Duchesne
Approval Date: November 19, 2018

1. Issued to:
INTEGRATED WATER MANAGEMENT, LLC

2. Authority:
Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. §§ 40-6-1 et seq., and Utah Admin. Code §§ R649-9 et seq., the
Utah Division of Oil, Gas and Mining (“Division”) issues this Permit to operate an E and P waste
disposal facility.

3. Duration:
This Permit shall expire five years from the Approval Date. The Division may revoke, suspend,
or impose additional operating conditions or limitations on a disposal facility permit at any time,
for good cause, after notice to the operator. The Division may suspend a waste disposal permit or
impose additional conditions or limitations in an emergency to forestall an imminent threat to
fresh water, public health, or safety of the environment. Suspension of a disposal facility permit
may be for a fixed period of time or until the operator remedies the violation or potential
violation. If the Division suspends a disposal facility permit, the disposal facility shall not accept
E and P waste during the suspension period.

4. General:
4.1 Effect on Prior Permits. This Permit supersedes any existing E and P waste disposal permit
previously obtained for the Facility and provides the terms that govern operations at this Facility.

4.2 Incorporation of Application. The Division issues this Permit in response to IWM’s “Permit
Renewal Application” dated 04/24/2018 and received by the Division on 07/26/2018,
(“Application”). The Facility shall operate in accordance with the best management practices
described in the Application.

4.3 Compliance with Applicable Laws. The Facility shall comply with Utah Code Ann. §§ 40-6-
1 et seq. and Utah Administrative Code §§ R649-9 et seq..

5. Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements:
The Facility shall comply with the reporting and recordkeeping requirements in
Utah Admin. Code § R649-9-11.

1594 West North Temple, Suite 1210, PO Box 145801, Salt Lake City, UT 84114-5801
telephone [phone] • facsimile [phone] • TTY [phone] • www.ogm.utah.gov

Sundry Number: 88041
RECEIVED: May. 11, 2018

6. Modifications:
This Permit only applies to the Facility as it is described in the Application. Any additions to the
Facility or modifications of the waste treatment processes described in the Application are not
allowed and require a permit modification.

7. Enforcement:
The issuance of this permit does not supersede local ordinances, county planning and zoning
requirements, or other permits required to conduct business at the Facility. A copy of this
approval should be kept at the IWM/North Blue Bench field office, and field personnel shall be
aware of the Conditions of Approval.

8. Approval:
Therefore, having met all the technical permit requirements of Utah Admin. Code §§ R649-9 et
seq., final approval to operate the Facility in accordance with this Permit is hereby granted.

9. Contact Information:
The following are Division of Oil, Gas and Mining contacts and their telephone numbers:
Dayne Doucet, Permit Manager: 801-538-5303
Bart Kettle, Operations Manager: 435-820-0862
Ammon McDonald, Environmental Scientist: 801-538-5337

Approved By:

________________________
By: Dayne Doucet
Title: Permit Manager

Sundry Number: 88041
RECEIVED: May. 11, 2018

Conditions of Approval:

1. Evaporation Facilities

1.1 A minimum of 2 feet of freeboard shall be maintained in the pit(s) at all times, and that a
method of obviously displaying the freeboard shall be devised and implemented. Utah Admin.
Code § R649-9-4.6.4.

1.2 Pit(s) are to be maintained such that hydrocarbons will not collect on the surface.
Hydrocarbon accumulations, other than de minimis quantities, shall be removed within 24 hours.
Utah Admin. Code § R649-9-4.6.4.

1.3 Spraying water to accelerate evaporation should be closely monitored. Overspray outside the
lined pit area is considered a violation. Utah Admin. Code § R649-9-4.9.2.

1.4 The leak detection system must be checked weekly. Any leak must be reported to the
Division immediately, and corrective measures must be taken as directed by the Division.

1.5 The compacted secondary containment berms at the Facility shall be inspected quarterly and
after a major rainstorm or windstorm to ensure integrity Utah Admin. Code § R649-9-11.3.2.

1.6 Evaporation ponds are permitted to accept produced water.

2. Landfarms

2.1 E and P waste accepted by the landfarm shall be sufficiently free of liquid content to pass a
60-mesh liquid paint filter test (i.e., no produced water or drilling mud).

2.2 Pooling of liquids in the landfarm is prohibited.

2.3 Within 72 hours after receipt of E and P waste, the operator shall prepare materials for
remediation.

2.4 Soils shall be turned regularly, a minimum of once a month.

2.5 Additional materials shall not be added until the soil concentrations of the current lift meet
the Division’s salinity and hydrocarbon cleanup standards.

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE ABOVE LISTED CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL MAY RESULT IN CLOSURE OF THE FACILITY.
Sundry Number: 88041
RECEIVED: May. 11, 2018
 STATE OF UTAH Waste Disposal Permit
 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AMENDED REPORT 
 DIVISION OF OIL, GAS AND MINING Original Filing Date: 5/11/2018
WASTE DISPOSAL PERMIT
  1. Name of Operator
  INTEGRATED WATER MANAGEMENT LLC
  2. Utah Account Number
  101104.0
  3. Address of Operator                   City            State      Zip
  PO BOX 430   ALTAMONT  UT  84001  
  4. Phone Number
   435-454-4646
  5. Name of 3rd Party Contractor
  GeoStrata
  6. Facility Name
  IWM North Blue Bench
  7. Address of Contractor                   City            State      Zip
  14425 South Center Point Way  Bluffdale  UT  84055  
  7. Phone Number
   8015010583
  9. Additional Comments
November 19, 2018
Sundry Number: 88041
RECEIVED: May. 11, 2018

20250 W 2000 S, Altamont, Utah 84001-0430
Rev 20180515

Permit Renewal Application
for
Integrated Water Management
a division of Integrated Energy Companies
IWM E&P Waste Disposal Facility
Five Year Permit Renewal
Presented To:
State of Utah
Division of Oil, Gas and Mining
Department of Natural Resources
Prepared by:
GeoStrata
14425 South Center Point Way
Bluffdale, UT 84055
on
April 24, 2018
Property Location:
Approximately 89 Acres in
SE/4 & NE/4 of SE/4 Section 30 and
SW/4 of SW/4 Section 29, T 2S, R 4W, UBSM
Duchesne County, Utah

Sundry Number: 88041 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: May. 11, 2018
Utah Division of Oil Gas & Mining Permit Renewal Application
for
IWM Exploration & Production Waste Disposal
20250 W 2000 S, Altamont, Utah

Rev 20180420 1 Page of 9

TABLE OF CONTENTS

A. Introduction and Narrative
B. Site Description and Assessment and Closure and Post Closure Cost Estimate
1. Description and Assessment of Existing Conditions
a. Site Description
b. Contamination Evaluation
c. Equipment Assessment
d. Practices Assessment
e. Monitoring Program
2. Closure Cost and Bonding Evaluation
a. Contamination Evaluation
b. Remediation of E&P Waste Contamination
c. Site Closure Evaluation Scope of Work
d. Infrastructure Removal Scope of Work
e. Seeding and Revegetation Scope of Work
f. Initial Closure Monitoring Report
g. Post Closure Monitoring Scope of Work
3. Observations and Recommendations
C. Attachments
1. Attachment 1 – Maps and Drawings
2. Attachment 2 – Third Party Closure Cost Estimate
3. Attachment 3 – Landfarm Data and Drawings

Sundry Number: 88041 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: May. 11, 2018
Utah Division of Oil Gas & Mining Permit Renewal Application
for
IWM Exploration & Production Waste Disposal
20250 W 2000 S, Altamont, Utah

Rev 20180420 2 Page of 9
A. Introduction and Narrative
Integrated Water Management (IWM) submits this Exploration and Production (E&P) Waste Disposal
Permit Renewal Application (Application) for the subject facility (Facility) in accordance with the
requirements of Utah Administrative Code, Rules R649-9-8.2, R649-9-8.2.1 and R649-9-8.5.1. This
Application includes an assessment of site reclamation requirements and closure cost estimates
compiled by GeoStrata™, a third-party contractor.
IWM understands that permit renewals may be approved for a five-year period depending on the
results of DOGM’s review of the Application and historic Facility compliance performance.
The Facility receives and treats produced water, natural gas liquids (NGL), other Exploration and
Production (E&P) wastes, and other wastes as may be permitted.
The Facility is located about 8 miles north of Duchesne, Utah and 0.3-miles east of Utah State Route
87. The address to the Facility is:
2050 West 2000 South
Altamont, Utah 84002-0430

Sundry Number: 88041 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: May. 11, 2018
Utah Division of Oil Gas & Mining Permit Renewal Application
for
IWM Exploration & Production Waste Disposal
20250 W 2000 S, Altamont, Utah

Rev 20180420 3 Page of 9
B. Site Description and Assessment, and Closure and Post Closure Cost Estimate
The following narrative addresses requirements established for permit renewal of the titled facility as
described in in Utah Division of Oil, Gas and Mining guidance document, Five Year E&P Waste Disposal
Facility Permit Renewals, (re: Utah Oil & Gas Conservation General Rules R649-9-8.5.1 Bonding of
Disposal Facilities), dated August 2017.
1. Description and Assessment of Existing Conditions
Site Description: The IWM Exploration & Production(E&P) Waste Disposal is located on
approximately 89 Acres situate in SE/4 & NE/4 of SE/4 Section 30 and SW/4 of SW/4 Section 29, T
2S, R 4W, UBSM.
a. Site Description.
The current site has of four fixed buildings, an off-loading area, one covered, concrete, in-ground
pump vault, 34-each, API-12 above-ground storage tanks which are in service, four operational
evaporation ponds, one three-acre Landfarm and one E&P Waste Landfill. The E&P Waste
Landfill is regulated by Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Waste
Management and Radiation Control, Solid Waste Program Management. Although the IWM
Landfill is co-located at the Facility, it is not regulated by DOGM.
The operational evaporation ponds are nominally 3.3, 1.0, 0.3 and 0.3 acres respectively.
Heating fuel is stored in one 30,000 gallon propane tank. That tank is mechanically protected by
an earthen berm on the north and a concrete wall on the south.
One set of injection pumps and one injection well are also located on the 90-acre site.
Liquid E&P Waste is discharged into the treatment system from transport trucks and above-
ground pipelines.
Water having relatively low solids content and no economically recoverable oil is routed directly
to a bank of nine above-ground, injection-water holding tanks.
Water having high solids content and/or a relatively economically recoverable oil content is piped
to a set of, API-12, heated and un-heated gravity separation tanks, then to two, heated cone-
bottom tanks for separation enhancement.
Cone-bottom tank effluent is mixed with certain conditioning reagents before being pumped to
three centrifuge separators.
Solids from gravity and enhanced gravity separation are stored in holding tanks before being
landfarmed.
Water from gravity and enhanced-gravity separation is routed to injection water holding tanks.
Treated water is temporarily held in the operational evaporation ponds only when injection water
surge capacity is needed to equalize flow to injection water pumps.
Oil from gravity and enhanced-gravity separation is temporarily held in an “oil-take-away tank”
before being piped to oil sales holding tanks.
Tank Bottoms waste and similar slurries are de-watered and conditioned for Landfarm treatment.
Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soils are accepted to be treated in the Landfarm if those materials
meet the paint filter test for moisture content.
Other permitted E&P waste is taken to the 4.5-acre landfill which is not permitted or regulated by
DOGM.
Sundry Number: 88041 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: May. 11, 2018
Utah Division of Oil Gas & Mining Permit Renewal Application
for
IWM Exploration & Production Waste Disposal
20250 W 2000 S, Altamont, Utah

Rev 20180420 4 Page of 9
One, 3.5-acre Stormwater Detention basin is located in the southwest corner of the site. It has
been designed to hold runoff generated by a 25-year, 24-hour storm until the runoff can be
sampled and lab-tested. Depending on lab results the water will be either released to the local
drainage, held to evaporate in place, diverted to evaporation ponds or disposed by some
combination of the three aforementioned methods.
See Process Flow Diagram in Attachment 1.
b. Contamination Evaluation
There is no known or observable surface soil contamination on this site.
No process-induced vadose zone soil or unconfined aquifer contamination is known to exist at
the Facility.
There are no known records of incomplete spill clean-up.
Process containment berms, sumps and similar enclosures are free from pooled oil and oil
contaminated accumulation.
c. Equipment Assessment
Major equipment operated at this facility has been examined by Engineer. Engineer’s opinion of
equipment service life expectations is included in this article. All tests were cursory in nature. A
review of equipment repair and evaluation records provided by Owner forms the basis of the
Engineer’s opinion of service life expectancy. All evaluations made were based upon the
assumption that regular maintenance and equipment repair has been and will continue to be
performed.
More particularly:
i. Site roadways are constructed and maintained with appropriate wearing surface,
drainage and turning radii for expected traffic.
ii. Roadway and site drainage channels show no signs of overflow or excessive erosion.
iii. Earthen structures are free of excessive erosion.
iv. Observable portions of piping and HDPE liners are not excessively worn or weathered.
The two smallest evaporation ponds are currently being re-built.
v. Pump seals do not leak and drips are installed where necessary for bearing water
discharge.
vi. Process heaters appear to be relatively new and automatically fire and shut off as would
be expected.
vii. Exposed surfaces of tanks and piping are corrosion free with the exception of mill scale
and light, tightly adhering rust. No corrosion pitting was observed.
viii. Buildings
- Office building is a space-conditioned, double-wide trailer equipped with wash water
supply and wastewater drainage. External siding, roofing and interior floors and
walls were determined be in satisfactory condition based on cursory visual
inspection.
- Shop building is a 30 by 90-foot, pre-engineered metal building on a concrete mat
foundation located immediately east of the office building. Only the second-floor
process control room is space-conditioned. The recent 25 X-60-foot addition is also a
Sundry Number: 88041 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: May. 11, 2018
Utah Division of Oil Gas & Mining Permit Renewal Application
for
IWM Exploration & Production Waste Disposal
20250 W 2000 S, Altamont, Utah

Rev 20180420 5 Page of 9
pre-engineered building constructed on a concrete mat foundation on the north side
of the shop building. It is not space-conditioned. It houses three 150-bbl mixing
tanks, three centrifuges, a number of feed pumps, metering pumps, transfer pumps
and solids holding bin.
- Regenerative blowers have been ordered and will be installed by the end of 2018 on
the vapor extraction system in this structure.
- The truck off-load building is a 10-year old, 12 X 15-foot, pre-engineered metal
building on a concrete mat foundation located about 200 feet northwest of the office
building. It has convenience electric power, but no water supply or wastewater
systems. External siding, roofing and interior floors and walls were determined be in
satisfactory condition based on cursory visual inspection.
- The Injection Pump Building is a 20-year old, 10 X 12-foot, pre-engineered metal
building on a concrete mat foundation located about 350 feet northeast of the office
building. It has convenience and 480V electric power, but no wash water supply or
wastewater systems. External siding, roofing and interior floors and walls were
determined be in satisfactory condition based on cursory visual inspection.
ix. Observable manual and motor-operated valves show signs of recent operation
suggesting they perform satisfactorily for throttling and shut-off.
x. Vapor Collection system was installed in 2017 to capture and route VOCs, water vapor
and excess air to a Combustor located about 200 feet north of the main tank batteries.
This system is constructed from three-inch, A106, socket-welded pipe. It was given a
cursory visual inspection last fall and showed no signs of excess wear, corrosion or weld
embrittlement. Even with small leaks the vapor collection system will operate safely
because it will always have, on average, a negative five-inch water column internal
pressure.
xi. Injection Pump and associated piping has operated within factory and regulatory
parameters since being overhauled about six months ago.
xii. Landfarm operation shows no sign of excess water or oil present in the mix. Landfarm
soil sampling and lab testing are performed at least monthly. Care is being taken to
accurately collect five-point composite samples that are representative of the landfarm
waste being treated.
d. Practices Assessment
Engineer has reviewed Owner provided operating procedures and has observed those
procedures in practice. Owner and Engineer offer the following practice changes to improve
efficiency and environmental protections.
i. Oil Cleaning, Water Disposal and Solids Disposal Operation Assessment
Controls for the process described in B., 1., a., above and shown on the Process Flow
Diagram in Attachment 1, are mostly automated. Instrumentation is mostly not
automated.
- Operators appear to be very familiar with the overall plant process and perform
process Quality Control for a large percentage of their time. Throughout their
working hours operators sample process liquids for anomalies. Whenever process
liquids or machinery operation appears abnormal operators will intervene in one of
two ways.
Sundry Number: 88041 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: May. 11, 2018
Utah Division of Oil Gas & Mining Permit Renewal Application
for
IWM Exploration & Production Waste Disposal
20250 W 2000 S, Altamont, Utah

Rev 20180420 6 Page of 9
Most often the operator will make equipment and process adjustments for which the
operator has been trained and given authority to perform.
Process and equipment adjustments which appear to be needed, but which operator
has not been authorized to perform, are immediately brought to the attention of
other operating staff and plant management for resolution.
- Large equipment temperatures, pressures, flowrates and the like are constantly
monitored by operating staff and management. Although some process monitoring
parameters are observed via remote displays, most instrument monitoring and all
sampling is locally observed/performed.
- Leak detection equipment is monitored weekly.
- It is the Engineer’s opinion that:
Some additional process monitoring automation would increase overall plant
efficiency and lessen the probability that accidental waste discharge would occur.
Installation of a Sequence of Events Recorder would also be beneficial after
automated process monitoring is implemented.
Weekly leak detection monitoring is appropriate.
Process sampling should continue to be performed manually and locally because this
operation is not big enough to warrant remote, automated process sampling.
The biggest process variable is the type of waste brought to the Facility. It is the
Engineer’s opinion there is no commercially available, off- the-shelf (COTS)
equipment to classify incoming waste. There is no Reasonably Available Control
Technology (RACT) or even Best Available Control Technology (BACT) that is
economically viable for IWM to implement. The methods that remain (client waste
certification, periodic waste testing by client, waste evaluation by experienced staff
and similar) are best available for the IWM operation and should continue to be
used.
ii. Landfarm Operation Assessment
- The existing landfarm accepts frac sands, filtered tank bottom sludges, and other
acceptable E&P solid wastes that pass a paint filter test and contain hydrocarbons.
This "Landfarm" is a wind-row, soil remediation process that reduces petroleum
contaminated soil (PCS) concentrations through biodegradation.
- Contaminated soils are periodically turned over using common farming or similar
equipment to aerate landfarmed soils. This practice supports naturally occurring
aerobic and/or augmented micro-organisms (archaea and bacteria) consuming E&P
waste in the contaminated soil.
Landfarm waste bulk density, texture and porosity are controlled by addition of
straw, sawdust, pearlite and similar conditioning material.
Clean, low salinity water is applied as needed to keep the soils moist enough to
support micro-organism growth.
- Runoff water is detained in the northwest corner of the landfarm. Excess stormwater
is drawn of as necessary and treated with incoming E&P waste.
- Visual and olfactory screening is used to monitor the landfarming process. Before
material is removed from the landfarm, samples are taken and lab tested to ensure
the treatment process is completed.
Sundry Number: 88041 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: May. 11, 2018
Utah Division of Oil Gas & Mining Permit Renewal Application
for
IWM Exploration & Production Waste Disposal
20250 W 2000 S, Altamont, Utah

Rev 20180420 7 Page of 9
- Engineer has determined that this treatment process and associated lab test results
are being correctly applied. No changes to this treatment process are needed to
comply with regulation or improve the process.
iii. Monitoring Program
Soil and water sampling and testing, visual equipment inspection, pressure tests, sampling and
analysis of material collected by leak detection systems used at this facility are described below.
i. Sampling and testing for spill and/or leak clean-up is always performed to verify that all
needed clean-up is complete.
Sampling of landfarm soil is performed to evaluate process efficiency, completeness of
hydrocarbon removal and salinity thresholds before removal of treated soil.
ii. Water Sampling and testing is performed on all liquid taken from leak detection sumps.
iii. Injection well water Pressure is monitored and recorded daily.
iv. Injection Well Metal Integrity Testing is performed every five years.
v. Injection Well flow rate is monitored and recorded daily.
vi. Leak Detection Monitoring of designated leak detection sumps is performed weekly.
iv. Additional or re-configured monitoring practices which could reasonably and economically
improve operational efficacy and detection of inadvertent waste release are described
below.
i. Mechanical and electrical equipment efficiency and safety could be enhanced by
performing the following.
- Quarterly survey of valve packing and gaskets for excessive wear and leaks.
- Annual evaluation of mechanical and hydraulic operating efficiency of pumps,
blowers and combustor. Such an evaluation would include verifying that equipment
is matched to system operating pressures and temperatures.
- Annual calibration of pressure release/vacuum relief valves and thief hatch springs
and weights.
- Annual cursory check of process and stoichiometry and mass balance to rule out
leaks and verify process efficiency.
- One-time evaluation of each pump and blower to verify that the correct type of
equipment has been chosen for the operating condition. For example, verifying that
the most appropriate equipment types and ratings have been selected.
- Quarterly readings to determine that individual large motor and plant-wide power
factor correction is within reasonable ranges to reduce electric power consumption
and demand.
- One-time power quality evaluation to determine Total Harmonic Distortion induced
by variable frequency drives and addition of inductors or other filters as may be
needed to cancel or block extraordinary levels of odd harmonics. Eliminating or
lowering these harmonics will allow motors to run cooler, lengthen motor life and
lower the frequency of unplanned outages.
Sundry Number: 88041 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: May. 11, 2018
Utah Division of Oil Gas & Mining Permit Renewal Application
for
IWM Exploration & Production Waste Disposal
20250 W 2000 S, Altamont, Utah

Rev 20180420 8 Page of 9
ii. To enhance early detection of inadvertent waste release and more accurately determine
leak sources IWM is considering:
- Adding a chemical marker to certain waste streams.
- Annual pressure testing of buried pipe.
- Five year liner leak testing.
2. Closure Cost and Bonding Evaluation
Bond cost components referenced in this section have been determined by applying unit costs to a
quantity take-off from drawings and documents provided by Owner and cursory field inspections
and surveys by the Engineer.
a. Contamination Evaluation
No evidence of Soil, Surface Water or Groundwater contamination was found at this facility.
b. Remediation of E&P Waste Contamination
None required.
c. Site Closure Evaluation Scope of Work
Upon closure the existence and extent soil contamination will be identified with a PID survey.
Groundwater quality and surface water will be sampled lab-tested. Hazardous substances stored
or used on site will be inventoried. Costs for this evaluation are included in calculated closure
costs in Appendix 2.
d. Infrastructure Removal Scope of Work
The cost to remove all site infrastructure and equipment as may be reasonable and necessary to
return site to a condition similar to its use and appearance before being used as an E&P Waste
Disposal is included in reclamation cost estimate.
No costs are included to reclaim and/or improve the site to conditions better than those occurring
before its use as and E&P Disposal or markedly better than exist on adjacent property. Grading
and contouring the site to the exact site geometry before site was used as an E&P Disposal has
not been used as a reclamation criterion.
As a general rule, infrastructure removal closure cost estimates include:
i. Removal all tanks, fences, buildings, liner materials, piping and concrete structures which
do not add value to the site are included in the Infrastructure Removal portion of closure
costs.
ii. Earthwork and grading to restore site to a serviceable condition similar to, and in keeping
with surrounding land use and drainage.
e. Seeding and Revegetation Scope of Work
Seeding/revegetation cost is based drag harrowing and hydroseeding is included in the closure
cost estimate. Seed mixture and application rate determined by Great Basin Company of
Ephraim, Utah are included in this component of closure cost estimate.
f. Initial Closure Monitoring Report
This report will describe:
Sundry Number: 88041 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: May. 11, 2018
Utah Division of Oil Gas & Mining Permit Renewal Application
for
IWM Exploration & Production Waste Disposal
20250 W 2000 S, Altamont, Utah

Rev 20180420 9 Page of 9
i. Closure PID survey results and required sampling and lab testing.
ii. Groundwater and surface water required to be sampled lab-tested.
iii. Inventory of hazardous substances removed from site.
iv. Description of site grading, revegetation and erosion control installed.
g. Post Closure Monitoring Scope of Work
Post closure monitoring and care cost includes annual:
i. Erosion control and surface water management.
ii. Sampling and testing of groundwater.
iii. Sampling and testing of site and Landfarm soil and surface water as described in the initial
closure report.
iv. Written report describing the condition of the reclaimed site and work performed to
monitor and maintain reclaimed site.
3. Observations and Recommendations
Included in Articles 1. d. and 1. f, above.

Sundry Number: 88041 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: May. 11, 2018
Utah Division of Oil Gas & Mining Permit Renewal Application
for
IWM Exploration & Production Waste Disposal
20250 W 2000 S, Altamont, Utah

Rev 20180515

C Attachments

Sundry Number: 88041 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: May. 11, 2018
Utah Division of Oil Gas & Mining Permit Renewal Application
for
IWM Exploration & Production Waste Disposal
20250 W 2000 S, Altamont, Utah

Rev 20180515

ATTACHMENT 1
Maps and Drawings

Sundry Number: 88041 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: May. 11, 2018
1:80,000 ±
Integrated Water Management
Oil Cleaning Plant
Duchesne, UT
Project Number: 751-061
Facility Location
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,0002,500
Feet
Figure
A-1
Copyright GeoStrata, 2018
Legend
Site Boundary
Facility Location
751-064
Sundry Number: 88041 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: May. 11, 2018
Sundry Number: 88041 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: May. 11, 2018
Sundry Number: 88041 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: May. 11, 2018
1:988 ±
Permit Application for E&P Landfill
Integrated Water Management
Duchesne, UT
Project Number: 751-064
Landfarm Layout
0 40 80 120 16020
Feet
Plate
A-4
Copyright GeoStrata, 2018
Landfarm Leachate Collection Area
Legend
Landfarm Drainage
Landfarm Leachate Collection Area
Staging Areas
Wind Row Areas
IWM Property
Sundry Number: 88041 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: May. 11, 2018
Utah Division of Oil Gas & Mining Permit Renewal Application
for
IWM Exploration & Production Waste Disposal
20250 W 2000 S, Altamont, Utah

Rev 20180515

ATTACHMENT 2
CLOSURE COST ESTIMATE
DOGM Closure Summary Form
GeoStrata Backup Calculations

Sundry Number: 88041 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: May. 11, 2018
Item
1 60.0 Acres
2
Unit Quantity Unit Price Extended Cost
References
- 01 20 00
- 01 30 00
- 01 40 00
- 01 50 00
- 01 70 00
Total: -$
3
Unit Quantity Unit Price Extended Cost
gallon 175,090 0.04$ 6,930.60$ 02 65 10.30 0130 (modifed for scale)
cubic yard 4,169 0.68$ 2,846.19$
0 0 -$
0 0 -$
0 0 -$
0 0 -$
0 0 -$
Total: 9,776.79$
4
Unit Quantity Unit Price Extended Cost
Cubic Yard 18,786 Varies 6,956.16$ 02 41 16.13 0020
Each 41 880.00$ 2,585.00$ 02 65 10.30 1253 Uprights are no cost
Each 4 200.00$ No Cost (net of salvage) 02 65 10.30 1253 Uprights are no cost
Linear Foot 4,500 0.26$ -$ Leak Detection Pipe will be ground up with liner shredding
HR 3 75.00$ 501.62$
Time to use a D5-mounted Rototiller (for shredding) was
applied to how many linear feet of liner there is on site
Cubic Yard 14,920 1.09$ 14,621.60$ 02 41 16.17 0440
Linear Foot 7,830 Varies 17,122.20$ 02 41 13.60 1600
Cubic Yard 1,037 0.04 44.70$
Hauling Costs were adjusted for specific distances to the
Duchesne County Landfill: 31 23 23.20 4104. Weights associated
with specific material type were derived from WasteCap
Resource Solutions Inc
Ton 853 20.00$ 17,063.41$ Duchesne/ Wasatch Bluebench Landfill Tonnage Rates
Total: 58,894.70$
5
Unit Quantity Unit Price Extended Cost
cubic yard 66,597 1.76$ 117,210.68$
31 23 16.46 5020 *Of note, Pond 3 (landfill is not included in
bonding estimates, as it does not fall under DOGM
cubic yard - 2.83$ -$ 31 23 16.46 5040
cubic yard - 1.53$ -$ 31 23 16.46 5000
square foot 780,793 0.05$ 39,039.65$
31 22 13.20 0280 (modifed for scale) of other disturbed area
within site boundaries
Total: 156,250.33$
6
Unit Quantity Unit Price Extended Cost
MSF 1,124 28.94 32,538.08$
32 92 19.14 5800 (modified with specific seeding costs of
Granite Seed in Lehi, UT)
Total: 32,538.08$
7
Unit Quantity Unit Price Extended Cost
Year 1 6,300.00$ 6,300.00$ GeoStrata estimates based off of inhouse estimates
Year 10 120.00$ 1,200.00$ GeoStrata estimates based off of inhouse estimates
Year 10 600.00$ 6,000.00$ GeoStrata estimates based off of inhouse estimates
Month 9 1,152.44$ 10,371.94$ GeoStrata estimates based off of inhouse estimates
Month 12 33.00$ 396.00$ GeoStrata estimates based off of inhouse estimates
Year 1 2,100.00$ 2,100.00$ GeoStrata estimates based off of inhouse estimates
Year 8 1,200.00$ 9,600.00$ GeoStrata estimates based off of inhouse estimates
Year 2 2,200.00$ 4,400.00$ GeoStrata estimates based off of inhouse estimates
Total: 40,367.94$
8
Type ID Number Posted Amount
1 7 380,037.00$
Total: 380,037.00$
31 23 23.20 4096 adjusted to specific distance from nearby water
disposal facility. For tank volume 10% of total volume was used
Final Closure & Post Closure Cost Estimates
Descripiton
Well Inspection & Sampling
Rough Grading
Revegetation Cost Estimates
Descripiton
Listed Reclamation
Water Quality Meter Rental
Lab Analysis
Grounds Maintenance
Landfarm Tilling
Monitoring Well Abandonment
Bond Posted
Bond Descripiton & Date
Annual Report
Final Post Closure Report
Hydro Seeding of Indian Rice Grass
Sand & Gravel to be Moved
Tanks
Gensets
Burried Piping
Concrete Pads
Fencing
Earthwork and Grading Cost Estimates
Descripiton
Common Earth to be Dozed
Clay to be Moved
Hauling
Dumping
Removal of Infrastructure Costs Estimates
Descripiton
Buildings
Shred Liner
Integrated Water Management
IWM E&P Disposal
Site Assessment, Closure & Post Closure Cost Estimate & Re-statement of Existing Bonds in Suport of DOGM Bonding Evaluation
Site Area
Contamination Remediation Cost Estimates
DOGM Line Item
Descripiton
Contingencies Price and Payments Procedures
Administrative Requirements
Quality Requirements
Temporary Facilities and Controls
Executions of Closeout Requirements
Indirect Costs
Self Attenuating
Post Remediation Sampling
Post Remediation Monitoring
Descripiton
Removal of Contaminated Liquid
Disposal of Contaminated Liquid
Vapor Extraction
Pump & Treat
Sundry Number: 88041 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: May. 11, 2018
Utah Division of Oil Gas & Mining Permit Renewal Application
for
IWM Exploration & Production Waste Disposal
20250 W 2000 S, Altamont, Utah

Rev 20180515

ATTACHMENT 3
LANDFARM DATA AND DRAWINGS
Sample Data
Sample Locations

Sundry Number: 88041 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: May. 11, 2018
Plate C-1Copyright GeoStrata, 2018
IWM Landfarm Sampling Results
Project Number: 751-064
Integrated Water Management
Highway 87
Duchesne, UT 84021
(IWM-Duchesne) Land Farm Sampling Results
Location Date Sample Number
TDS TPH (DRO) TPH (GRO)
Electrical
Conductivity
(EC)
Electrical
Conductivity
(EC)
Exchagable
Sodium
Percentage
(ESP)
Sodium
Absorption
Ratio (SAR)
Laboratory Laboratory Laboratory Field Laboratory Laboratory Laboratory
mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mmho/cm mmho/cm % ratio
≤ 4 mmho/cm ≤ 4 mmho/cm ≤ 15% ≤ 12
Land Farm 8/18/2015 TP-1 (0-1) 2650 32800 1.92 NA NA NA NA
Land Farm 8/18/2015 TP-1 (1-2) 5070 21600 51.9 NA NA NA NA
Land Farm 8/18/2015 TP-1 (2-3) 4700 33800 2.85 NA NA NA NA
Land Farm 8/18/2015 TP-1 (3-4) 4520 27700 2.57 NA NA NA NA
Land Farm 8/18/2015 TP-1 (4-5) 2610 2570 2.3 NA NA NA NA
Land Farm 8/18/2015 TP-2 (0-1) 2360 37400 3.18 NA NA NA NA
Land Farm 8/18/2015 TP-2 (1-2) 4170 36100 15 NA NA NA NA
Land Farm 8/18/2015 TP-2 (2-3) 2590 34600 10.3 NA NA NA NA
Land Farm 8/18/2015 TP-2 (3-4) 2940 22300 0.765 NA NA NA NA
Land Farm 8/18/2015 TP-2 (4-5) 2560 9090 1.01 NA NA NA NA
Land Farm 8/18/2015 TP-3 (0-1) 2790 25100 3.59 NA NA NA NA
Land Farm 8/18/2015 TP-3 (1-2) 2160 30300 245 NA NA NA NA
Land Farm 8/18/2015 TP-3 (2-3) 3330 25200 5.64 NA NA NA NA
Land Farm 2/16/2017 TP-1 2020 12600 3.97 NA NA NA NA
Land Farm 2/16/2017 TP-2 5560 22800 52.4 NA NA NA NA
Land Farm 2/16/2017 TP-3 3820 19600 23.6 NA NA NA NA
Land Farm 2/16/2017 TP-4 3430 26500 14.1 NA NA NA NA
Land Farm 2/16/2017 TP-5 6040 22900 13.7 NA NA NA NA
Land Farm 8/18/2015 TP-3 (3-4) 2670 11700 5.17 NA NA NA NA
Land Farm 8/18/2015 TP-4 (0-1) 3320 18300 4.15 NA NA NA NA
Land Farm 8/18/2015 TP-4 (1-2) 2740 28000 773 NA NA NA NA
Land Farm 8/18/2015 TP-4 (2-3) 3630 40200 11.1 NA NA NA NA
Land Farm 8/18/2015 TP-4 (3-4) 2520 24500 4.37 NA NA NA NA
Land Farm 1/11/2018 A (0-12") NA NA NA NA 6.92 13 10.7
Land Farm 1/11/2018 A (12-24") NA NA NA NA 6.29 13 11.4
Land Farm 1/11/2018 B (0-12") NA NA NA NA 20.10 33 33.8
Land Farm 1/11/2018 B (12-24") NA NA NA NA 17.80 29 28.3
Land Farm 1/11/2018 C (0-12") NA NA NA NA 20.40 26 24.7
Land Farm 1/11/2018 C (12-24") NA NA NA NA 20.80 30 29.3
Land Farm 1/11/2018 D (0-12") NA NA NA NA 7.48 14 12.1
Land Farm 1/11/2018 D (12-24") NA NA NA NA 8.31 16 13.5
Land Farm 1/11/2018 E (0-12") NA NA NA NA 9.54 16 13.6
Land Farm 1/11/2018 E (12-24") NA NA NA NA 10.80 17 15.0
Land Farm 1/11/2018 F (0-12") NA NA NA NA 6.95 12 10.4
Land Farm 1/11/2018 F (12-24") NA NA NA NA 8.09 13 10.9
Land Farm 5/2/2018 1 NA NA NA 0.03 3.27 7.1 6.02
Land Farm 5/2/2018 2 NA NA NA 0.57 3.57 10 8.61
Land Farm 5/2/2018 3 NA NA NA 0.06 9.18 22 19.8
Land Farm 5/2/2018 4 NA NA NA 0.05 4.98 16 13.7
Land Farm 5/2/2018 5 NA NA NA 3.36 6.80 18 15.4
Land Farm 5/2/2018 6 NA NA NA 2.74 6.41 15 12.7
Background 5/25/2018 LF-1-BGSS NA NA NA NA 0.102 -0.78 0.333
Background 5/25/2018 LF-2-BGSS NA NA NA NA 0.072 -1.2 0.061
Background 5/25/2018 LF-3-BGSS NA NA NA NA 0.178 0.16 0.961
Background 5/25/2018 LF-4-BGSS NA NA NA NA 0.059 -1.2 0.044
Background 5/25/2018 LF-5-BGSS NA NA NA NA 0.117 -1 0.157
Land Farm 7/18/2018 IWM-WR-SS-1 NA NA NA AL AL AL AL
Land Farm 7/18/2018 IWM-WR-SS-2 NA NA NA AL AL AL AL
Land Farm 7/18/2018 IWM-WR-SS-3 NA NA NA AL AL AL AL
Land Farm 7/18/2018 IWM-WR-SS-4 NA NA NA AL AL AL AL
BOLD -The Analytical Result is Above Applicable Limit (00.0)
NA - Not Analyzed
AL - At the Laboratory for Analysis
Sundry Number: 88041 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: May. 11, 2018
Plate C-2Copyright GeoStrata, 2018
IWM Landfarm Sample Locations
Project Number: 751-064
Integrated Water Management
Highway 87
Duchesne, UT 84021
8/18/2015 1/11/2018
1/11/2018 5/2/2018
5/25/2018 7/3/2018
Sundry Number: 88041 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: May. 11, 2018
For Division Use Only
Compliance Review Completed:
No outstanding compliance
Active violation/compliance matter
Signature:
Comments
Five Year E&P Waste Disposal Facility Permit Renewal Checklist
Permit Renewal Application Submission
Submit an assessment of site reclamation requirements from a certified
third party contractor R649-9-8.2
Submit closure cost estimates from a certified third party contractor
R649-9-8.2
Provide bond amount approved by the Division R649-9-8
Detailed Site Description
Function of the waste disposal facility
Current facility map
Site descriptions annotated with facility infrastructure and associated function
Contamination Assessment
Description of existing contaminatioin with sample results
Proposed monitoring/remediation
Proposed practices to prevent further contamination
Equipment Assessment
Description and assessment of equipment located at the facility
Describe in detail service life for equipment used in facility operations Description of testing
completed for equipment (tanks, piping, liners, leak detection equipment, evaporation fans)
Practices Assessment
Assessment of management practices utilized to operate the facility Identify alternative
practices which could improve operations or reduce probability of future contamination
Name of Facility Operator:
Name of Facility:
Location:
Date:
Preparer:
Date Initials Date InitialsReceivedReviewed
Review Completed: Application Status: APPROVED
For Division Use Only Below This Line
Sundry Number: 88041
RECEIVED: May. 11, 2018
Infrastructure Removal Costs
Contouring or Regrading Costs
Seeding Costs
Notes:
Contamination Costs
Estimating Closure Cost and Bonding Evaluation
Removal / Remediation
Sampling
Post closure monitoring
Expenses to remove all infrastructure and equipment
Project expense to contour site back to original grade
Volumes of material
Equipment costs
Labor costs
Method of reseeding
Species used for revegetation
Date Initials Received Comments
Monitoring Program
Detailed description of monitoring programs in use or being proposed (visual inspections of
equipment, pressure tests, leak detection systems, waste accountability, automated systems,
proposed practices which can reduce the risk of future contamination)
Sundry Number: 88041
RECEIVED: May. 11, 2018
RECEIVED: Aug. 19, 2022

STATE OF UTAH
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF OIL, GAS, AND MINING 
FORM 9
SUNDRY NOTICES AND REPORTS ON FACILITIES
1. TYPE OF FACILITY
  Waste Facility/Commercial 
5. FACILITY NAME:
 IWM North Blue Bench 
2. NAME OF OPERATOR:
 Integrated Water Management LLC 
6. FACILITY NUMBER:
 166 
3. ADDRESS OF OPERATOR:
 PO Box 430 , Altamont, UT, 84001 
7. PHONE NUMBER:
 435-454-4646 
4. LOCATION OF FACILITY  
  Qtr/Qtr:SESE Section: 30 Township: 2S Range: 4W Meridian: U 
COUNTY:
 DUCHESNE 
STATE:
 UTAH 
11.
CHECK APPROPRIATE BOXES TO INDICATE NATURE OF NOTICE, REPORT, OR OTHER DATA 
TYPE OF SUBMISSION TYPE OF ACTION
    NOTICE OF INTENT 
Approximate date work will start:
8/19/2022
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SUNDRY  Submitted PDF Copy  
    New Facility Construction   
    Repair of Facility   
    Facility Reclamation   
    Facility Status Report   
    Results of Sampling    
    Change to Previous Plans   
    E&P Waste Disposal Facility Permit   
    Other Tanks Added
12. DESCRIBE PROPOSED OR COMPLETED OPERATIONS. Clearly show all pertinent details including dates, depths, volumes, etc.
New tanks will be added to the water receiving portion facility. 5 New 400 BBL tanks added with at least on old tank removed. No
changes to the process or throughputs will be necessary. IWM has also started the modification to the air permit to add the tanks. The
attached file shows the proposed location of the new tanks at the facility.
NAME (PLEASE PRINT)  
 Nathan Robinson  
PHONE NUMBER
435 454-4646 
TITLE
 Director 
SIGNATURE
 N/A 
DATE
 8/19/2022 
Sundry Number: 118692 Facility Number: 166
RECEIVED: Aug. 19, 2022
PRE-INJECTION
TANKS
SEPARATION
TANKS
BRINE
TANKS
OFF-LOADING
TANKS
IMW Facility, Duchesne, UtahSCALE: 1" = ADD SCALE
751-074 Air Permit Modification 2019
NOA
REV DATE BY DESCRIPTION
BER Proposed Facility Layout07-12-19
A-2
X:\Projects\751-Integrated Water Management\060-Tabby Junction Landfill Permit\Design\Integrated Internet Symbol 2.png
LEGEND
Removed Tank
New Tanks
NEW TANK
IN-SERVICE TANK
REMOVED TANK
Sundry Number: 118692 Facility Number: 166
RECEIVED: Aug. 19, 2022
0'25'50'100'
Storage Tanks
Centrifuge Bldg.
Ramp
Access Rd.
Section Line
Detention Basin
30
31170'
SECT 30
SECT 31
T 2S, R 4W, UINTAH BASIN
SPECIAL MERIDIAN
IMW Facility, Duchesne, UtahSCALE:1" = ADD SCALE
751-074 Air Permit Modification 2019
NOA
REV DATE BY DESCRIPTION
BER Proposed Water Cleaning Facility07-12-19
A-3
X:\Projects\751-Integrated Water Management\060-Tabby Junction Landfill Permit\Design\Integrated Internet Symbol 2.png
Sundry Number: 118692 Facility Number: 166
Integrated Water Management Date: 7/23/2018
Facility: IWM E&P Disposal
Number of Acres to be Reclaimed 25.8 Acres 1
Incl Indirect?
Indirect Costs -
Contamination Remediation Cost Estimates N 9,776.79$ 2
Removal of Infrastructure Costs Estimates N 58,894.70$ 3
Earthwork and Grading Cost Estimates N 156,250.33$ 4
Revegetation Cost Estimates N 32,538.08$ 5
Final Closure & Post Closure Cost Estimates N 40,367.94$ 6
Total Cost Estimate 297,827.84$
(Increase above total cost estimate by determined percenetage if indirect costs are not included) 79,817.86$
Total Reclamation Cost Required 377,645.70$
Bond Posted 380,037.00$ 7
Difference Between Cost Estimate and Bond 2,391.30$
Direct and Indirect Costs
Five Year E&P Waste Disposal Facility Bond Calculation Summary Form
Sundry Number: 88041 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: May. 11, 2018