DRC-2024-005286

AH H.C
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
April 5, 2024
Mr. Doug Hansen, Director
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control
195 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, UT 841 I 6
Re: Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480; License Renewal Application.
Dear Director Hansen:
APR O 9 202¼
VWCCAO.ureaa:
10808 S. River Front Pukway
Suite 321
South Jordan, Utah 84095
Office: 385.246.1250
Fu: 801.326.4872
Anfield Resources Holding Corp. (Anfield) herein resubmits its application for renewal of the Shootaring Canyon
Uranium Milling Facility Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480. Please accept this submission as an entire revision
to Anfield's formal application to renew the License under Utah Administrative Code R3 I 3-22-37. This submission
includes two complete copies of the application with digital files of all application documents, which consists of the
following materials:
A)Form DRC-01 with Addendum.
B)Supporting documents which include the following:
License Renewal Application, State of Utah Radioactive Materials License No. UT 0900480
Exhibits A. l through A.5
i)Exhibit A. l 2003 NRC Environmental Assessment
ii)Exhibit A.2
iii)Exhibit A.3
iv)Exhibit A.4
v)Exhibit A.5
Environmental Report
Current Groundwater Discharge Permit UGWl 70003
Annual 2023 Groundwater Monitoring Report
Second Half 2023 Effluent Monitoring Report
Exhibits B. l through B.5
i) Exhibit B.l Tailings Facility Design Report
ii)Exhibit B.2 Tailings Storage Facility Technical Specifications and QA/QC Plan
iii)Exhibit B.3
iv)Exhibit B.4
v)Exhibit B.5
Exhibit C.l
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan
Groundwater Monitoring Sampling and Analysis Plan and QA Plan.
Groundwater Compliance Monitoring System Design
i)Radiological Dose Evaluation for Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility, March 2024
Should you have any questions in regard to this submittal, please contact Corey Dias at [phone] or e-mail at
[e-mail].
Sincerely,
'7� Joshua Bleak/ President
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
cc: Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility file
DRC-2024-005286
DWMRC!Ql
01/16
UTAH DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT AND RADIATION CONTROL
APPLICATION FOR RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL LICENSE
INSTRUCTIONS: Complete all applicable items. Use supplemental sheets where necessary. Mail to: Utah Department of
Environmental Quality, Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control, P.O. Box 144880, Salt Lake City, Utah
84114-4880. If your application contains 25 pages, or more, an electronic copy must also be submitted on a CD or DVDnonrewriteable disk. This electronic copy shall consist of either a PDF searchable text document or a Microsoft Office Worddocument. (See R313-12-111.) Upon approval of this application, the applicant will receive a Radioactive Material License, issuedin accordance with the requirements contained in the current Radiation Control Rules as adopted by the Board.
1.THIS IS AN APPLICATION FOR:2.NAME, MAILING ADDRESS, & ZIP CODE
C A New License Name IAnfield Resources Holding Corp. I
urlo900480 Address 10808 S. River Front Parkway(i' Amendment to License Number I Suite 321
url I City !south Jordan J statelur I r Renewal of License Number Zip Code 184095 I
3.STORAGE/USE LOCATION 4.NAME OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED ABOUT
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility THIS APPLICATION
Address Generally 2 miles north ofTicaboo, Utah Name: lcorey Dias I located at latitude 37° 42' 30" North, m
City lricaboo J State Jur I Zip Code I I Telephone No. 1(416) 827-8064 I
In addition to above address, use at temporary job sites? I N� Email: [e-mail] I
SbJBM!I�;ITEMS 5 THRQUGH,E8 1/2" X 1 lf P APE�il!y AL�!i&ESPONSE�/I'<:>T�'�SPEC1'IV�/fEM • ff
AND/QB SUB ITEM OB1THE . ... . SING GQIDE. S1;6• E THIS�liQRM TO THijPAPERSr? �r:1
5.RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL TO BE POSSESSED 6.PURPOSE FOR WHICH LICENSED MATERIAL
WILL BE USED
7.INDIVIDUAL(S) RESPONSIBLE FOR RADIATION 8. TRAINING FOR INDIVIDUALS WORKING IN ORSAFETY PROGRAM AND THEIR TRAINING AND
EXPERIENCE FREQUENTING RESTRICTED AREAS
9.FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT 10.RADIATION SAFETY PROGRAM
11.WASTE MANAGEMENT 12.LICENSE FEES:
Fee Category: i2bi I Amount Enclosed $ 0.00
13.CERTIFICATION: The applicant, or official executing this certification on behalf of the applicant named in Item 2,certifies that this application is prepared in conformity with current Radiation Control Rules adopted by the Utah RadiationControl Board and that all information contained herein, including any supplements attached hereto, are true and correct tothe best of his/her knowledge and belief.
��
!Joshua Bleak I I President I 3/31/2024
Signature-Certifying Official Typed/Printed Name Title Date
. Anfield Resources Holding Corp. Shootaring Canyon Mill
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480
ADDENDUM
APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF STATE OF UTAH RADIOACTIVE
MATERIALS LICENSE NO. UT0900480
This is an Addendum to the Form DRC-01 application (the "Application") to renew State
of Utah Radioactive Materials License No. UT0900480 (the "License") for the Shootaring
Canyon Uranium Facility (the "Mill"). Reference is made to the License Renewal Application,
State of Utah Radioactive Materials License No. UT0900480, dated March 31st, 2024, (the
"Application Documents"), prepared by Anfield Resources Holding, Corp. ("Anfield") and its
contractors and all documents incorporated by reference in the Application Documents.
The Application Documents and all of their respective Appendices and documents incorporated
by reference therein, are hereby incorporated by reference in this Application. The applicant,
Anfield, hereby responds to Items 5 through 11 of Form DRC-01, as follows:
5.RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL TO BE POSSESSED
The following radioactive material will be possessed by Denison under the License:
•An unlimited quantity of natural uranium in any chemical and/or physical form; and
•Byproduct material, as defined in Utah Code Section 19-3-102, in the form of uranium
waste tailings and other uranium byproduct waste generated by Anfield's milling
operations authorized by the License.
6.PURPOSE FOR WHICH LICENSED MATERIAL WILL BE USED
Anfield proposes to continue to operate the Mill and use the licensed material as described in
Volume 1, Section 2 and elsewhere in the Application Documents.
7.INDIVIDUAL(S) RESPONSIBLE FOR RADIATION SAFETY PROGRAM AND
THEIR TRAINING AND EXPERIENCE
The Radiation Safety Officer at the Mill, Ms. Sheryl Garling is the individual responsible
for the radiation safety program at the Mill. Ms. Garling has the following training and
expenence:
a)Positions Held•
•
•
•
Approved by Utah Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control (UDWMRC) as Anfield Radiation Safety Officer (RSO) for the Shootaring Mill,
Approved by U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Agency (NRC) as and RSO, and Contract RSO for operations: Inter-Mountain Laboratories, Energy Laboratories, Inc., Cleveland Cliffs, American Nuclear Corporation, Uranium Resources, Inc.,
Approved by NRC and State Agencies to provide radiation monitoring and surveys in support of decommission, decontamination, reclamation for operations: Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality (WDEQ) for a variety of Abandoned Mine Reclamation Projects, Cameco, Exxon Highland, Pathfinder Mines, MolyCorp Louviers Site, Marathon Oil, UNC Mining &amp;
Milling, North Dakota Radiation Control for site release compliance.
Accepted by regulatory agencies for technical support for compliance with regulations associated with As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) and environmental compliance: Cameco Crow
1 of3 pages License Renewal Application
April 2024
� Anfield Resources Holding Corp. Shootaring Canyon Mill Radioactive Materials License UT0900480 Butte Resources, Cameco Smith Ranch, Inter-Mountain Laboratories, Inc., Uranium One, Uranium Energy Corporation (Texas Commission Environmental Quality-TCEQ). •As Project Engineer for URI, assisted with design, managed construction and assisted with initialstart up of Tenneco's West Cole Plant in Benavides, TX; Project Engineer and RSO for URI'sNorth Platte Pilot Plant, responsibilities included design, construction and project/operationmanager located north of Douglas, WY.b)Work Experience(see attached list)c)Formal Education•B.S. Civil Engineering - Clarkson College of Technology (now Clarkson University),Potsdam, NY 1977d)Professional Training Courses Taken•Initial training for radiation safety office through Eberline, Albuquerque, NM, 1979•Continually maintained biennial training for radiation safety officer through a varietyof third party technical training courses; Nevada Technical Associates, Inc. Stan AHuber Consultants, Inc. (SACHI), Noel Savignac, Radiation Safety & ControlServices, Inc. Reynolds Electric/Harvard RSO course, etc.e)Certifications•Radiation Safety Officer recurrent training, most recent February 2016•Department of Transportation (DOT) Hazardous Materials Transportation Certified to includedTrain the Trainer for training under US DOT Technical Service Institute (TSI).8.TRAINING FOR INDIVIDUALS WORKING IN OR FREQUENTING
RESTRICTED AREASThe Mill's training program is discussed in Volume l, Section 5.4, and elsewhere in the Application Documents. 9.FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENTThe Mill's facilities and equipment are described in detail in Volume 1, Section 3, andelsewhere in the Application Documents.10.RADIATION SAFETY PROGRAMThe Mill's Radiation Safety Program is described in detail in Volume 1, Section 6, andelsewhere in the Application Documents.11.WASTEMANAGEMENTThe Mill's waste management facilities, equipment and programs are described in detailin Volume 1, Section 3.2 and Section 4, and elsewhere in the Application Documents.2 of3 pages License Renewal Application April 2024
@ APp,ir?$iq
gnwhonmFntdl Servlces, Inc.
arid Raci;€iicn Coiltrol
APR 1 ? ?$2'I
April10,2024
Mr. Doug Hansen, Director
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control
195 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84116
Re: Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480; License Renewal Application electronic files.
Dear Director Hansen:
With this letter, please find a replacement usb drive with the electronic copy of the Anfield Resources Holding Corp. (Anfield)
application for renewal of the Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480. This
usb drive replaces the usb drive, submitted with the application on April 5,2024, that was unreadable.
Should you have problems with this drive or the electronic files contained on it, please contact me.
Sineerely,
A n.il
cc: Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility file
226 Peterson St.
Fort Collins. Colorado 80524
(970) 305-7r48
[e-mail]

SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM MILLING FACILITY
LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION
ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT

Radioactive Material License UT 0900480

APRIL 2024

Submitted By:

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
10808 S. River Front Parkway
Suite 321
South Jordan, UT 84095

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

TABLES

Reagents Process
Sulfuric Acid Leach
Sodium chlorate Leach
Flocculent Leach, Countercurrent Decantation, Precipitation
Ammonia Solvent Extraction, Precipitation
Tridecanol, Tertiary Amine, Kerosene Solvent Extraction
Sodium bicarbonate Solvent Extraction
Sodium hydroxide Precipitation
Charcoal (carbon)Precipitation
Table 1-1 Reagents used in the Milling Process
Table 1-2 Plant Stack Emissions
Ore Dump
Pocket
SAG Mill
Leach Tanks
Yellowcake
Centrifuge
and Calciner
Product
Drumming
Laboratory Fume
Hood Manifold
Vanadium
Precipitation
and Ammonia
Removal
Vanadium
Packaging
and Drying
S-11A
S-11B
Emission Control
Equipment
Venturi Wet
Gas Scrubber Demister Venturi Wet
Gas Scrubber
Water Wash
Down
Venturi Wet
Gas Scrubber
Venturi Wet
Gas Scrubber Tier 4 Final Tier 4 Final Tier 4 Final
Collection
Efficiency (percent)99.5 >99.5 99.7 U308 -99.5 99.5 ---
Exit Flow Rate
(cfm)6000 5000 3000 2000 6000 6000
Exit Temperature
(oF)Ambient 60-70 150-200 60 120 120
Exit Diameter (in.)18 18 18 12 18 18
Release Height (ft)a 100 90 90 35 80 80 80 80 80
Note: The amounts of criteria emissions for the diesel generators will be calculated for the Notice of Intent to the Utah Department of Air Quality.
aFeet above ground level
cfm = cubic feet per minute oF = degrees Fahrenheit ft = feet g/m2 = grams per square meter lb/hr = pounds per hour in. = inches
SAG - semi autogenous grinding ppm = parts per million
Effluent
Concentrations/
Emission
Generator Set Exhaust
S-14 S-15 S-15
Ore Dust
0.03-0.05
g/m2
Negligible
amounts of
sulfuric acid
mist and
radon-222
Yellowcake
(90 percent
U308 ) 0.02
lb/hr:
ammonia 5
ppm
Miscellaneous
Vapors
V2 0 5 Dust 0.01-
0.03 g/m3
V205 Dust
0.03-0.05
g/m3
See Note
below.
Stack Number S-1 S-5 S-7 S-12 S-13
See Note
below.
See Note
below.
Table 3-1 Land Cover within 50 Square Miles of the Facility
Land Cover Type Percent of Total Area
Colorado Plateau Blackbrush-Mormon-tea Shrubland 47.28
Colorado Plateau Mixed Bedrock Canyon and Tableland 35.4
Colorado Plateau Pinyon-Juniper Shrubland 3.99
Inter-Mountain Basins Mixed Salt Desert Scrub 2.62
Inter-Mountain Basins Active and Stabilized Dune 2.4
Inter-Mountain Basins Shale Badland 1.7
Colorado Plateau Pinyon-Juniper Woodland 1.5
Inter-Mountain Basins Semi-Desert Shrub Steppe 1.46
Inter-Mountain Basins Semi-Desert Grassland 0.95
Rocky Mountain Cliff and Canyon 0.9
Inter-Mountain Basins Mat Saltbush Shrubland 0.8
Developed, Open Space - Low Intensity 0.33
Inter-Mountain Basins Big Sagebrush Shrubland 0.15
Developed, Medium - High Intensity 0.15
Southern Colorado Plateau Sand Shrubland 0.11
Inter-Mountain Basins Greasewood Flat 0.11
Invasive Southwest Riparian Woodland and Shrubland 0.06
Invasive Annual Grassland 0.04
Open Water 0.03
Invasive Annual and Biennial Forbland 0.02
Rocky Mountain Montane Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest and Woodland 0.02
Inter-Mountain Basins Montane Sagebrush Steppe 0.01
Rocky Mountain Lower Montane Riparian Woodland and Shrubland 0.01
Rocky Mountain Montane Dry-Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest and Woodland 0.002
Table 3-2 Population in the State of Utah and in Counties Near the Facility
County Square
Kilometers Square Miles Population People/km2 People/mi2 Population People/km2 People/mi2 Population People/km2 People/mi2
Garfield 8,329 5,175.15 5,083 0.61 1 5,172 0.62 1 4,735 0.57 0.91
Wayne 3,961 2,461 2,486 0.63 1 2,461 0.62 1.1 2,509 0.63 1.02
San Juan 12,585 7,819.80 14,518 1.15 1.9 14,746 1.17 1.9 14,413 1.15 1.84
Kane 6,421 3,989.95 7,667 1.19 1.19 7,125 1.11 1.8 6,046 0.94 1.52
Iron 6,319 3,926.34 57,289 9.07 17.4 46,163 7.31 14 33,779 5.35 8.60
Plute 1,221 758.44 1,438 1.18 1.9 1,556 1.27 2.10 1,435 1.18 1.89
Beaver 4,157 2,582.90 7,072 1.70 2.7 6,629 1.59 2.60 6,005 1.44 2.32
State of Utah 132,572 82,376.85 3,271,616 24.68 39.70 2,763,885 20.85 33.60 2,233,169 16.84 27.11
Town Square
Kilometers Square Miles Population People/km2 People/mi2 Population People/km2 People/mi2 Population People/km2 People/mi2
Hanksville 3 1.72 158 57 92 314 113 183 344 124 200
Hite 2,615 1,624.80 73 0.03 0.04
Kanab 23 14.44 4,683 202 324 4,312 186 299 4,743 204 328
Monticello 3,593 2,232.66 3,562 1 1.6 3,773 1.1 1.7 3,169 0.9 1.4
Circleville 801 497 1,045 1.3 2.1 1,087 1.4 2.2 972 1.2 2
Ticaboo 267
Notes:
km2 = square kilometers mi 2 = square miles a Census, 2024 c Census, 2003
b Census, 2012
Land Area 2020 Populationa 2010 Populationb 2000 Populationc
Land Area 2020 Populationa 2010 Populationb 2000 Populationc
Population Groups
Population Percentage Population Percentage Population Percentage Population Percentage Population Percentage
Population 3,271,616 5,083 2,486 7,667 14,518
Under 5 years 225,742 6.9 5.5 6.4 5.7 6.1
Under 18 years 902,966 27.6 22.1 22.9 23.2 28.1
65 years and over 392,594 12 24 23.1 23.6 15.2
Population per square mile 39.7 1 1 1.9 1.9
Population Percentage Population Percentage Population Percentage Population Percentage Population Percentage Population Percentage
Total population (2020)3,271,616 5,083 2,486 7,667 14,518 149
White alone 2,944,454 90 4,585 90.2 2,349 94.5 93.9 49 139 93.3
Black or African American alone 52,346 1.6 36 0.7 17 0.7 1 0 0
American Indian and Alaska Native alone 44,167 1.5 152 3 27 1.1 1.8 47 5 3.4
Asian alone 1,466 2.8 66 1.3 27 1.1 1 1 0
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 530 1.2 20 0.4 5 0.2 0.1 0.1 1 0.7
Two or More Races 43 2.9 224 4.4 62 2.5 2.4 2.5
Hispanic or Latino 80 15.1 386 7.6 174 7.0 5.6 6.7
White alone, not Hispanic or Latino 33 76.7 4,336 85.3 2,200 88.5 89.1 45 4 2.7
Labor
In civilian labor force, total percent of population over
16years (2018-2022)69.1 59.3 63.3 57.8 54
In civilian labor force, female percent of population over
16years (2018-2022)61.8 56.5 59.9 60.8 48.3
Income and Poverty
Median household income (in 2022 dollars, 2018-2022)
Individuals below the poverty line 8.2 9.3 11.5 9.2 22.8
U. S. Bureau of Census, Quickfacts, Accessed March 2024
$25,108
Kane County San Juan County
Kane County San Juan County
San Juan CountyKane County
$70,327
Kane County San Juan County
Utah Garfield County Wayne County
$86,833 $56,481 $64,870
Hanksville
Utah Garfield County Wayne County
Utah
Table 3-3 Demographics
Garfield County Wayne County
Utah Garfield County Wayne County
Table 3-4 Daily Vehicle Traffic Data
All Vehicles Trucks All Vehicles Trucks All Vehicles Trucks All Vehicles Trucks All Vehicles Trucks
Colorado 141 104635 SH 141 N/O SH 491 & ROAD 6 560 50 560 50 460 50 520 50
Colorado 141 104638 SH 141 SE/O K8 RD 170 50 170 50 200 50 220 50 220 50
Colorado 141 104637 SH 141 N/O MONTICELLO RD, CR H1, EGNAR 250 40 250 40 270 40 310 50 300 50
Colorado 491 105621 SH 491 NW/O SH 141 3500 760 3500 760 3200 690 2900 630
Colorado 491 105622 SH 491 (OLD SH 666) W/O CR 2.00 @ MP 2800 670 2800 670 260 630 2800 670
Utah 24 015-0095 Goblin Valley State Park vis SR 24 - I-70 781 267 840 288 836 286 803 275 823 48
Utah 24 015-0185 SR 24 Hanksville Buckmaster Draw 5653 2069 6105 2233 5339 2086 5291 1446 5140 343
Utah 70 015-0190 SR 6 West SR 191 North 12596 4724 13603 5101 11901 4659 11795 3700 11463 881
Utah 95 017-0125 SR 276 to Bullfrog Marina via SR 95 - Hite Marina 301 90 324 96 294 116 284 105 282 25
Utah 276 017-0145 SR 95 26 miles South of Hanksville via SR 276 - Ticaboo Lodge 324 85 348 92 316 83 305 80 303 7
Utah 276 017-0150 Ticaboo Lodge via SR 276 - Glen Cyn Natl Rec Area Bndry 627 165 675 177 612 161 591 155 586 14
Utah 276 017-0170 SR 276 - Lake Powell Ferry Dock 126 136 123 119 118
Utah 70 019-0014 SR 19 West Green River 9579 3506 10344 3784 9050 3536 8969 2450 8716 582
Utah 70 019-0015 SR 19 East Green River 10241 4025 11060 4346 9676 3802 9590 3768 9320 900
Utah 70 019-0016 Ranch Exit (Floy)11872 5034 12821 5425 11217 4747 11117 4704 10804 1342
Utah 70 019-0020 SR 191 Crescent Junction Moab 10152 4609 10964 4977 9592 4354 9506 4315 9238 1434
Utah 70 019-0035 SR 128 Cisco Whitehouse 9164 4472 9896 4832 8658 4228 8581 4190 8339 1429
Utah 70 019-0040 North Cisco 8971 4486 9688 4842 8476 4236 8400 4198 8163 1443
Utah 70 019-0041 Ranch Exit (Cottonwood)8952 4476 9667 4832 8458 4227 8383 4189 8147 1441
Utah 70 019-0045 Westwater - Colorado State Line 8190 4095 8845 4420 7738 3867 7669 3833 7453 1318
Utah 128 019-0060 Castle Valley via SR 128 - I 70 364 93 391 100 355 91 343 87 340 6
Utah 191 019-0077 Center St via SR 191 (Main St) - 500 W Moab 16116 4190 15878 4124 14051 4468 14729 4073 14412 709
Utah 191 019-0080 500 W via SR 191 - SR 128 Moab 15150 3939 14926 3891 13209 3887 13846 3358 13548 488
Utah 191 019-0086 SR 279 via SR 191 - Arches Natl Park *ATR* 421 12101 4574 13211 5000 9708 3718 11133 3919 10851 926
Utah 191 019-0090 Arches Natl Park via SR 191 - SR 313 Dead Horse Point 9646 4765 10530 5204 7743 3827 8880 4388 8655 1558
Utah 191 019-0091 SR 313 Dead Horse Point via SR 191 - I 70 Crescent Jct 9501 4693 10373 5126 7627 3769 8746 4322 8524 1535
Utah 95 037-0015 Hite Marina via SR 95 - SR 276 Halls Crossing 199 84 214 90 194 92 187 86 186 28
Utah 95 037-0016 SR 276 Halls Crossing via SR 95 - SR 275 Natural Bridges 451 78 485 83 440 140 425 118 422 18
Utah 95 037-0025 SR 275 Natural Bridges via SR 95 - SR 191 544 298 585 321 531 291 513 281 509 118
Utah 191 037-0080 SR 95 South of Blanding via SR 191 - 800 S Blanding 3428 881 3548 913 3140 830 3848 580 3686 67
Utah 191 037-0085 800 S via Main St (SR191) - 200 N Blanding 3026 826 3132 854 2772 770 3397 573 3254 74
Utah 191 037-0090 200 N Blanding via Main St (SR191) - Dodge Point 3309 953 3425 987 3031 882 3714 693 3557 98
Utah 191 037-0100 Dodge Point via SR 191 - 4th S Monticello 2757 838 2854 867 2526 769 3095 633 2965 98
Utah 191 037-0105 400 S via Main St (SR 191) - SR 491 (Center St) Monticello 3456 1106 3578 1142 3166 1006 3880 863 3716 145
Utah 191 037-0110 SR 491 (Center St) via Main St (SR 191) - 6th N Monticello 8626 2881 8618 2885 7442 2465 7801 1874 7444 339
Utah 491 037-0171 500 E via Center St - Port of Entry Monticello 3804 1404 3774 1390 3081 1135 3313 1219 3232 228
Utah 491 037-0175 Monticello POE via SR 491 - Colorado State Line *ATR* 324 3551 1310 3523 1298 2876 1060 3092 1137 3017 213
Utah 491 037-0195 SR 491 E Monticello via Ucolo Lisbon Rd 113 115 107 107 106
Utah 24 055-0065 SR 95 Hanksville via SR 24 - Goblin Valley State Park 472 148 507 159 485 153 466 147 477 22
Utah 95 055-0085 SR 24 Hanksville via SR 95 - SR 276 *ATR* 414 756 130 840 145 803 256 771 214 790 34
Utah Garfield County Road 13383
2020 2019 2018StateRouteStationDescription20222021
Table 3-5 Soil Series within 50 Square Miles of Facility
MUSYM Soil Description Farmland Acres Percent of
Total Area
3 Badland-Rock outcrop complex Not prime farmland 7682.1 20.03
60 Moffat loamy fine sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes Not prime farmland 4534.9 11.83
36 Glenberg family Not prime farmland 3860.6 10.07
83 Rizno,warm-Rock outcrop complex Not prime farmland 2421.9 6.32
57 Moenkopie fine sandy loam Not prime farmland 2229.3 5.81
20 Canyon family-Rock outcrop complex Not prime farmland 2193.8 5.72
106 Stormitt gravelly loam, 2 to 15 percent slopes Not prime farmland 2105.5 5.49
107 Stormitt extremely bouldery loam, 4 to 30 percent slopes Not prime farmland 2063.6 5.38
64 Monue loamy fine sand Not prime farmland 1988.6 5.19
92 Rock outcrop-Stormitt-Rizno complex Not prime farmland 1350.2 3.52
35 Farb-Farb,very shallow-Rock outcrop complex Not prime farmland 1168.9 3.05
51 Milok-Chipeta complex Not prime farmland 884.5 2.31
23 Chipeta silty clay, 2 to 15 percent slopes Not prime farmland 839.9 2.19
80 Rizno fine sandy loam, 4 to 15 percent slopes Not prime farmland 776.4 2.02
99 Sheppard loamy fine sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes Not prime farmland 756.4 1.97
38 Green River-Myton families complex Not prime farmland 590.8 1.54
34 Farb-Rock outcrop complex Not prime farmland 481.4 1.26
87 Rock outcrop-Arches complex Not prime farmland 357.4 0.93
74 Pennell-Moenkopie-Rock outcrop complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes Not prime farmland 353.1 0.92
59 Moenkopie-Rock outcrop complex Not prime farmland 323.8 0.84
93 Rock outcrop-Travessilla complex Not prime farmland 268.3 0.70
86 Rock outcrop Not prime farmland 261.7 0.68
73 Pennell fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes Not prime farmland 261.2 0.68
69 Otero-Glenberg families complex Not prime farmland 258.5 0.67
63 Montosa family, 4 to 8 percent slopes Not prime farmland 156.5 0.41
15 Blackston gravelly fine sandy loam, 8 to 30 percent slopes Not prime farmland 94.9 0.25
72 Pastern cobbly fine sandy loam, 2 to 15 percent slopes Not prime farmland 64.6 0.17
62 Moffat-Sheppard complex Not prime farmland 10.8 0.03
5 Begay fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes Not prime farmland 7.7 0.02
Table 3-6 Entrada Sandstone Horizontal Groundwater Flow Gradients
Groundwater
Elevation 1
Groundwater
Elevation 1
Lateral
Offset Gradient
(ft-amsl)(ft-amsl)(ft)(ft/ft)
RM1 4271.5 RM14 4256.94 1,000 NA 0.015
RM1 4271.5 RM19 4255.05 1230 298 0.013
RM1 4271.5 RM18 4255.26 1300 705 0.012
RM1 4271.5 RM7 4253.49 1330 482 0.014
RM1 4271.5 RM20 4248.37 2110 NA 0.011
RM1 2 4272.67 RM15 2 4236.05 3025 NA 0.012
RM7 4253.49 RM20 4248.37 660 225 0.008
RM18 4255.26 RM20 4248.37 675 NA 0.01
RM19 4255.05 RM20 4248.37 775 400 0.009
RM14 4256.94 RM20 4248.37 1025 682 0.008
RM202 4248.58 RM15 2 4236.05 930 NA 0.013
RM2R2 4265.16 RM22 4261.51 220 NA 0.017
0.012 Average
0.017 Maximum
0.008 Minimum
ft-amsl - feet above mean sea level 0.003 Standard Deviation
RM2R data from April 20, 2003, RM2 data from January 27, 2003.
From To Distance (ft)
1 November 5, 2023 water level data, except as noted.
2 RM1 data from November 12, 2003.
Shootaring Canyon Mill
Table 3-7 Calculated Vertical Gradient Between Wells RM8 and RM20
Well
Top of Casing Elevation (ft-amsl)4381.77 4380.83
Casing Stick up (ft-amsl)3.1 1.6
Screen Zone (ft., bgs)57 - 77 131-211
Vertical Well Screen Separation (ft.)104 (The difference between the mid-point of each screen zone)
Date
Depth to Water
(ft, bTOC)
Water Elevation
(ft-amsl)
Depth to
Water
(ft, bTOC)
Water
Elevation
(ft-amsl)
Vertical Gradient
(ft/ft)
11/12/03 58.25 4323.52 129.9 4250.93 0.689
11/30/03 56.8 4324.97 129.2 4251.63 0.696
03/23/04 58.4 4323.37 131.09 4249.74 0.699
06/16/04 57.8 4323.97 129.9 4250.93 0.693
09/21/04 58 4323.77 130.0 4250.83 0.692
11/07/04 58.1 4323.67 129.7 4251.13 0.688
03/20/05 57.9 4323.87 130.0 4250.83 0.693
06/12/05 57.9 4323.87 131.3 4249.53 0.706
09/11/05 58 4323.77 130.6 4250.23 0.698
12/13/05 57.8 4323.97 130.1 4250.73 0.695
03/11/06 57.9 4323.87 130.7 4250.13 0.700
06/11/06 57.4 4324.37 130.7 4250.13 0.705
09/20/06 57.8 4323.97 130.8 4250.03 0.702
12/08/06 58.4 4323.37 130.9 4249.93 0.697
03/10/07 56.9 4324.87 130.1 4250.73 0.704
06/25/07 56.5 4325.27 130.1 4250.73 0.708
08/31/07 57.2 4324.57 130.5 4250.33 0.705
12/04/07 57.45 4324.32 131.2 4249.63 0.709
03/26/08 56.95 4324.82 131.50 4249.33 0.717
06/30/08 57.20 4324.57 131.9 4248.93 0.718
09/24/08 57.88 4323.89 131.68 4249.15 0.710
12/15/08 57.33 4324.44 131.57 4249.26 0.714
02/09/09 57.05 4324.72 131.30 4249.53 0.714
04/13/09 56.79 4324.98 131.65 4249.18 0.720
08/24/09 57.17 4324.60 131.70 4249.13 0.717
10/18/09 57.15 4324.62 131.80 4249.03 0.718
02/01/10 56.40 4325.37 131.82 4249.01 0.725
04/12/10 56.20 4325.57 131.20 4249.63 0.721
06/21/10 56.80 4324.97 131.90 4248.93 0.722
08/17/10 56.60 4325.17 131.93 4248.90 0.724
08/30/10 56.60 4325.17 131.93 4248.90 0.724
10/18/10 56.55 4325.22 132.00 4248.83 0.725
01/24/11 56.00 4325.77 131.20 4249.63 0.723
04/11/11 55.90 4325.87 131.90 4248.93 0.731
07/25/11 55.80 4325.97 132.00 4248.83 0.733
10/17/11 56.38 4325.39 132.00 4248.83 0.727
02/23/12 55.40 4326.37 132.00 4248.83 0.737
04/30/12 55.65 4326.12 132.31 4248.52 0.737
07/23/12 55.45 4326.32 132.30 4248.53 0.739
10/01/12 55.82 4325.95 132.25 4248.58 0.735
02/19/13 54.80 4326.97 132.00 4248.83 0.742
05/13/13 55.00 4326.77 132.30 4248.53 0.743
07/15/13 54.90 4326.87 132.35 4248.48 0.745
11/04/13 54.90 4326.87 132.45 4248.38 0.746
02/24/14 54.70 4327.07 132.40 4248.43 0.747
04/28/14 54.70 4327.07 132.50 4248.33 0.748
07/21/14 54.50 4327.27 132.45 4248.38 0.750
10/27/14 54.50 4327.27 132.60 4248.23 0.751
02/23/15 54.20 4327.57 132.60 4248.23 0.754
05/11/15 54.00 4327.77 132.40 4248.43 0.754
08/10/15 54.00 4327.77 132.60 4248.23 0.756
10/19/15 54.10 4327.67 132.40 4248.43 0.753
03/07/16 54.30 4327.47 132.90 4247.93 0.756
04/29/16 53.45 4328.32 132.05 4248.78 0.756
08/04/16 53.75 4328.02 132.35 4248.48 0.756
10/18/16 53.40 4328.37 132.02 4248.81 0.756
02/15/17 54.40 4327.37 132.22 4248.61 0.748
05/02/17 53.39 4328.38 131.83 4249.00 0.754
07/18/17 54.19 4327.58 132.20 4248.63 0.750
10/31/17 53.95 4327.82 132.10 4248.73 0.751
02/20/18 54.00 4327.77 131.90 4248.93 0.749
04/23/18 54.15 4327.62 132.00 4248.83 0.749
07/09/18 54.31 4327.46 132.22 4248.61 0.749
10/09/18 53.40 4328.37 132.00 4248.83 0.756
01/26/19 54.15 4327.62 132.30 4248.53 0.751
04/28/19 53.55 4328.22 132.10 4248.73 0.755
07/28/19 54.20 4327.57 132.40 4248.43 0.752
11/03/19 53.50 4328.27 132.18 4248.65 0.757
02/16/20 53.27 4328.50 132.12 4248.71 0.758
05/24/20 53.43 4328.34 132.05 4248.78 0.756
07/07/20 53.88 4327.89 132.00 4248.83 0.751
10/04/20 54.00 4327.77 132.30 4248.53 0.753
01/22/21 54.00 4327.77 132.30 4248.53 0.753
04/01/21 53.95 4327.82 132.00 4248.83 0.750
07/09/21 54.10 4327.67 132.25 4248.58 0.751
10/03/21 54.18 4327.59 132.30 4248.53 0.751
02/05/22 54.20 4327.57 132.35 4248.48 0.751
04/02/22 53.90 4327.87 132.05 4248.78 0.751
07/09/22 53.92 4327.85 132.50 4248.33 0.756
10/16/22 53.25 4328.52 132.15 4248.68 0.759
03/10/23 53.50 4328.27 132.12 4248.71 0.756
04/22/23 54.40 4327.37 132.31 4248.52 0.749
07/15/23 53.42 4328.35 132.15 4248.68 0.757
11/05/23 54.52 4327.25 132.46 4248.37 0.749
ft-amsl - feet above mean sea level ft/ft - foot per foot
ft, bTOC - feet below top of casing
ft., bgs - feet below ground surface
RM8 RM20
Wells 25-Jan-03 16-Jan-04 21-Sep-04
OW1A 4243.33 4250.23 4233.13
OW2 4247.8 4241.2 4242.2
OW4 4258.99 4241.24 4242.06
OW1B 4026.03 4026.03 4024.5
OW3 4017.58 4017.88 4017.93
OW1A-OW1B 217.3 224.2 208.63
OW2-OW3 230.22 223.32 224.27
ft-amsl - feet above mean sea level
CARMEL FORMATION
NAVAJO SANDSTONE
Measured Difference in Groundwater Elevation (ft)
Table 3-8 Entrada, Carmel, and Navajo Unit Groundwater Elevation Comparison
Groundwater Elevation
(ft-amsl)
ENTRADA SANDSTONE
Theis Theis
Early Time Late Time
RM15 360 ----360 48.13 350 0.14 --Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM1 ----420 --420 56.15 350 0.16 0.0006 Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM2 ----420 --420 56.15 350 0.16 0.0008 Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM3 --560 560 --560 74.86 350 0.21 0.00046 Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM4 560 440 520 --506.67 67.73 350 0.2 0.00037 Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM5 600 650 560 --603.33 80.65 350 0.21 0.00096 Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM6 480 470 490 --480 64.17 350 0.19 0.00033 Hydro-Engineering, 1999
OW1A ----210 --210 28.07 350 0.08 0.00049 Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM1 63 ------63 8.42 60 0.14 --Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM2R 7 ----7.8 7.4 0.99 50 0.02 --Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM3 142 ----134 138 18.45 300 0.06 --Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM4 ------230 230 30.75 385 0.08 --Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM4R 6 ----24 15 2.01 100 0.02 --Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM7 13 ------13 1.74 85 0.02 --Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM8 5 ------5 0.67 35 0.02 --Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM9 11 ------11 1.47 25 0.06 --Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM11 ------1 1 0.13 100 <0.002 --Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM12 20 ------20 2.67 15 0.18 --Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM13 13 ----11.2 12.1 1.62 75 0.02 --Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM14 20 ----9.3 14.65 1.96 100 0.02 --Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM16 6 ----8.4 7.2 0.96 150 0.01 --Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM17 13 ----12.4 12.7 1.7 80 0.02 --Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM18 ------------350 0.28 --WESI. 2013
RM19 ------------350 0.03 --WESI. 2013
RM20 ------------350 0.12 --WESI. 2013
WW1 15,800 15,700 17,000 16,166.67 2,161.17 400 5.403 --Hydro-Engineering, 1999
OW1B 22,600 21,300 19,800 21,233.33 2,838.48 400 7.096 0.0049 Hydro-Engineering, 1999
OW3 18,800 19,800 19,300 2,580.03 400 6.45 0.005 Hydro-Engineering, 1999
Average Maximum Minimum Standard
Deviation Count
ft/day 0.11 0.28 0.01 0.083 22
cm/s 3.80E-05 9.80E-05 3.50E-06 2.90E-05
ft/day 0.04 0.06 0.02 0.028 2
cm/s 1.40E-05 2.10E-05 7.10E-06 1.00E-05
ft/day 6.316 7.096 5.403 0.855 3
cm/s 2.20E-03 2.50E-03 1.90E-03 3.00E-04
Table 3-9 Aquifer Test Results
RM15 Multi-Well Test Entrada Sandstone
Well
Transmissivity (gpd/ft)
Thickness (ft)
Hydraulic
Conductivity
(ft/day)
Storage Data SourceStraight Line Recovery
Method
Perched Entrada Sandstone
Navajo Sandstone
Average
(gpd/ft)
Average
(ft 2 /day)
Single Well Tests Entrada Sandstone
Multi-Well Test Navajo Sandstone
Hydraulic Conductivity
Entrada Sandstone
Table 3-10 Total Monthly Precipitation Recorded for the Facility and at Selected Regional Stations, 1980-1982 and 2023
Bullfrog
Basin
Marina1
(3822 ft)
Hanksville 1
(4308 ft)
1980 1981 1982 2023 1980 1980
January 1.02 0.00 0.38 NA 1.98 0.59
February 1.04 0.00 0.22 NA 1.27 0.27
March 1.11 0.98 0.16 NA 1.49 1.86
April 0.21 0.08 0.00 NA 0.44 0.32
May 0.18 0.31 0.06 NA 0.52 0.63
June 0.00 0.76 0.00 NA 0.00 0.00
July 0.29 0.53 0.16 0.15 0.08 0.06
August 1.11 0.32 1.94 0.46 0.50 0.23
September 1.33 1.00 1.15 0.07 0.61 2.73
October 0.80 2.13 0.00 0.47 0.50 0.49
November 0.26 0.69 0.89 0.07 0.07 0.10
December 0.28 0.06 0.76 0.16 0.55 0.03
Totals 7.63 6.86 5.72 1.38 8.01 7.31
1 Source: National Climatic Data Center (http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/online/coop-precip.html)
Month
Precipitation (inches)
Facility
(4650 ft)
Ft - feet
NA - not applicable (not collected)
Table 3-11 Species Observed During the June 2008 Survey
American Crow Corvus brachyrhynchos One individual seen flying in
the distance, off property
Chukar Alectoris chukar Female with 8 young
Common Raven Corvus corax Several seen throughout site
Horned lark Eremophila alpestris Observed and heard singing
Mourning Doves Zenaida macroura Several seen throughout site
Song Sparrow Melospiza melodia Near Dam
Songbird Species not verified Several unidentified species
Sparrows Species not verified Several unidentified species
Starlings Sturnus vulgaris Two starling like birds in the
distance in the tailings cell
Swallow Species not verified Several near cliffs
Western King Bird Tyrannus verticalis Southeast of Buildings Near
Water Tank
Coyote Canis latrans Scat
Desert Cottontail Sylvilagus audubonii Several Individuals and Scat
Hopi Chipmunk Neotamius rufus Several Individuals, mainly
along east boundary
Black greasewood Sarcaliatus vermiculatus
Broom snakeweed Gutierrezia sarothrae
Cheat grass Bromus tectorum
Foxtail Alopecurus spp.
Green Mormon Tea Ephedra vividis
Milkvetch Astragalus spp.
Opuntia Opuntia spp
Rabbit brush Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus
Russian thistle Salsola spp.
Sage Artemisia spp
Salt cedar Tamarix ramosissima
Sand dropseed Sporobolus cryptandrus
Shadscale Saltbush Atriplex confertifolia
Spiny hopsage Grayia spinosa
Western salsify Tragopogon dubius
Yucca Yucca glauca
Vegetation Species
Mammal Species
Avian Species
Common Name Scientific Name Notes
Table 4-1 Radiological Dose to Specific Receptors - Environmental MILDOS Model
TEDE Current
Configuration
TEDE Proposed
Configuration
Maximum
Occupancy
(mrem yr -1 )(mrem yr -1 )(hr yr -1 )
Nearest Ticaboo residence 12 12 1.4 6,570 0.50/0.25 West Northwest >21 at 2%
Cowboy Camp 2 3 1.2 4,380 0.00/0.50 Northwest >21 at 1%
Nearest Residence 3 3 2 6,570 0.50/0.25 North Northeast >21 at 10%
Office Worker 84 59 0.02 2,000 0.23/0.00 South Southwest >21 at 16%
% - percent mi - miles
> - greater than
hr yr-1 - hours per year
kts - knots
mrem yr-1 - millirem per year
TEDE - total effective dose equivalent
Receptor
Distance
from Facility
(mi)
Indoor/Outdoor
Occupancy
Fraction
Predominant Wind
Direction (blowing
from)
Wind Speed (kts) and
Frequency
Table 5-1 Alternative Impacts
Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3
No Action Proposed Action Reclamation of the Facility
Topography No change in topography
Final surface of the Tailings Storage
Facility will be 30 to 50 feet higher than
current ground surface but lower than the
surrounding topography
The final surface would be lower than the
maximum height identified in the
Proposed Action but would be higher
than the current ground surface and
lower than the surrounding bluff and
mesa.
Land Use Impacts No change in land use
Land use within the property boundary is
milling and that will not change with
approval of the Proposed Action
Land use within the property boundary is
milling.After reclamation and
decomissioning,all or a portion of the
Facility will be aquired by the
Department of Energy with no access by
the public.
Demography No change in demography
The population of Ticaboo would increase
by 70 people or 70 percent if all Facility
workers settled in Ticaboo.
The population of Ticaboo would
increase by 20 people or 20 percent if all
reclamation workers lived in Ticaboo.
Transportation Impacts No change in transportation
Truck and vehicle traffic will increase
during Facility upgrade and during
operations.The truck traffic to the Facility
would increase
Truck and vehicle traffic will increase
during Facility reclamation and
decommissioning.
Geology and Soil Impacts No change in geology or soil
Excavation of soil impacted by the 1982
tailings spill and grading of the area for
South Cell construction and excavation and
construction of the process ponds in
portions of areas that have not previously
been disturbed.Soil in this area is
predominantly Badland-Rock outcrop
complex with some Moenkopie fine sandy
loam.The removal of the impacted soil
and grading for construction of the South
Cell will cause irretrievable loss of less than
one acre of the soil and bedrock,if any,in
this area.As discussed in Section 3.7,the
Badland-Rock outcrop complex has limited
use for wildlife and is not suitable for
grazing.Additionally,borrow sources
would be disturbed as discussed in Exhibit
B.3 of the License Renewal Application to
provide material to complete the
reclamation of the Facility.Soil and rock
would be lost in those areas as well.
Excavation of soil impacted by the 1982
tailings spill and other impacted soil in
areas that were previously disturbed.The
disturbance would likely involve less than
one acre of the Badland-Rock outcrop
complex soil.Additionally,borrow
sources would be disturbed as discussed
in the approved Reclamation Plan (Hydro-
Engineering, 2005) to provide material to
complete the reclamation of the Facility.
Soil and rock would be lost in those areas
as well.
Water Resource Impacts No change in water resources
The restricted area of the Facility as
proposed for the Proposed Action is
designed for zero discharge of surface
water.Any precipitation that results in
flow inside the restricted area would be
routed to ponds or the tailings storage
facility.The cover on the South Cell would
slope to promote runoff into designed
channels to facilitate flow.
This engineered liner of the South Cell
would act to protect groundwater from the
disposed tailings.Storage tanks will be
enclosed in containment structures to
ensure that spills do not reach
groundwater.
The NRC (2003)identified that the
approved cover for the existing tailings
storage facility would prevent the
migration of contaminants from the
impoundment.
The NRC identified that the design
features of the impoundment as approved
in the Reclamation Plan (Hydro-
Engineering,2003)that would be
implemented in Alternative 3 will prevent
any adverse effect to the ephemeral
surface waters of the Shootaring Canyon
drainage basin and corresponding flow to
the Shitamaring Creek and Hansen Creek
drainage basins (NRC, 2003).
Ecological Resource Impacts No change in ecological resources
The South Cell and process ponds would
have fluid impounded that could
potentially attract wildlife.If wildlife were
to solely use these features,impacts could
occur.The NRC assessed impacts to
terrestrial and aquiatic biota (NRC,1979)
and determined that significant impacts to
wildlife were not expected but the actual
extent of those impacts could not be
quantified.
No change in ecological resources
Air Quality Impacts No change in air quality
The Proposed Action could cause impacts
to the local ambient air quality from
fugitive dust and vehicle exhaust as a result
of excavation,grading,hauling,truck and
personnel vehicle travel to and from the
Facility,the use of diesel generators,and
radon from the tailings storage facility.
The nearest resident is more than one mile
from the Facility and any potential impacts
to air quality would be local.
Short-term impacts to the local ambient
air quality from fugitive dust and vehicle
exhaust may occur as a result of
excavation,grading,and hauling
activities. The NRC (2003) identified that
given the short duration of
decommissioning and reclamation and
the sparse population,no significant
adverse impacts to members of the public
would occur.
Noise Impacts No change in noise
The nearest resident in 1.4 miles east of the
Facility.Construction to upgrade the
Facility and operations at the Facility
would likely not be heard more than 0.3
miles from the Facility
The nearest resident in 1.4 miles east of
the Facility.Equipment operation during
reclamation of the Facility would likely
not be heard more than 0.3 miles from
the Facility
Historic and Cultural Resource Impacts No change in cultural or historic resources
No impacts to cultural or historic resources
as all non-disturbed areas not previously
surveyed will be surveyed before
disturbance.
No impacts to cultural or historic
resources as all non-disturbed areas not
previously surveyed will be surveyed
before disturbance.
Visual/Scenic Resource Impacts No change in visual or scenic resources
The Facility is viewable along a short
stretch of Highway 276.The height of the
Facility and any additional buildings and
features will not be higher than current
features.
The Facility is viewable along a short
stretch of Highway 276.Reclamation
would remove the buildigns which are
visible from Highway 276.
Socioeconomic Impacts No demographic or socioeconomic
impacts
Salaries would be above the median
income of Garfield and the surrounding
counties.Approximately 95 jobs would be
supplied in an area with a 6.7%
unemployment rate.
Salaries would be above the median
income of Garfield and the surrounding
counties.Approximately 20 jobs would
be supplied in an area with a 6.7%
unemployment rate.
Public and Occupational Health Impacts No Public and Occupational Health
Impacts
Public exposure to contaminated soil and
tailings could occur.It is unlikely that any
member of the public will have the
potential to exceed 100 mrem/year which
is the public dose limit.
No additional impacts not identified in
the approved Reclamation Plan.
Nonradiological Impacts No additional non-radiological impacts
Non-radiological gaseous effluents are
limited mainly to kerosene evaporation in
the solvent extraction process and ammonia
emissions from the yellowcake drying
furnace. The average ammonia effluent
concentration at the stack is lower than the
8 hour time weighted average threshold
limit value. Potential offsite human impacts
would be minimal.
No additional impacts not identified in
the approved Reclamation Plan.
Radiological Impacts No additional radiological impacts
Radiologcal impacts during operations are
managed to levels that are ALARA.Post-
reclamation radiologivsl impacvts impacts
are minimized per the proposed
Reclamation and Decommmissioning Plan.
No additional impacts not identified in
the approved Reclamation Plan.
Waste Management Impacts
All wastes generated would be licensed
and managed in existing facilities on-site
under existing procedures,monitoring,
reporting and radiation protection plans.
All wastes generated would be licensed and
managed in existing facilities on-site under
existing procedures,monitoring,reporting
and radiation protection plans.
All wastes generated would be licensed
and managed in existing facilities on-site
under existing procedures,monitoring,
reporting and radiation protection plans.
Affected Environment
Table 5-2 Projected Daily Vehicle Traffic
All Vehicles Trucks All Vehicles Trucks All Vehicles Trucks
All Vehicles
including
Mill
Trucks
including
Mill
Mill percent
of All
Vehicles
Mill percent
of Trucks
Colorado 141 104635 SH 141 N/O SH 491 & ROAD 6 560 50 574 51 683 61 698 76 2 20
Colorado 141 104638 SH 141 SE/O K8 RD 170 50 174 51 207 61 222 76 7 20
Colorado 141 104637 SH 141 N/O MONTICELLO RD, CR H1, EGNAR 250 40 256 41 305 49 320 64 5 24
Colorado 491 105621 SH 491 NW/O SH 141 3500 760 3588 779 4270 927 4285 942 0.4 2
Colorado 491 105622 SH 491 (OLD SH 666) W/O CR 2.00 @ MP 2800 670 2870 687 3416 817 3431 832 0.4 2
Utah 24 015-0095 Goblin Valley State Park vis SR 24 - I-70 781 267 801 274 953 326 993 366 4 11
Utah 24 015-0185 SR 24 Hanksville Buckmaster Draw 5653 2069 5794 2121 6897 2524 6937 2564 1 2
Utah 70 015-0190 SR 6 West SR 191 North 12596 4724 12911 4842 15367 5763 15407 5803 0.3 1
Utah 95 017-0125 SR 276 to Bullfrog Marina via SR 95 - Hite Marina 301 90 309 92 367 109 407 149 10 27
Utah 276 017-0145 SR 95 26 miles South of Hanksville via SR 276 - Ticaboo Lodge 324 85 332 87 395 104 473 182 16 43
Utah 276 017-0150 Ticaboo Lodge via SR 276 - Glen Cyn Natl Rec Area Bndry 627 165 643 169 765 201 795 201 4 0
Utah 276 017-0170 SR 276 - Lake Powell Ferry Dock 126 0 129 0 154 0 184 0 16 0
Utah 70 019-0014 SR 19 West Green River 9579 3506 9818 3594 11686 4277 11694 4285 0.07 0.19
Utah 95 037-0015 Hite Marina via SR 95 - SR 276 Halls Crossing 199 84 204 86 243 103 283 143 14 28
Utah 95 037-0016 SR 276 Halls Crossing via SR 95 - SR 275 Natural Bridges 451 78 462 80 550 95 590 135 7 30
Utah 95 037-0025 SR 275 Natural Bridges via SR 95 - SR 191 544 298 558 306 664 364 704 404 6 10
Utah 191 037-0080 SR 95 South of Blanding via SR 191 - 800 S Blanding 3428 881 3514 903 4182 1075 4222 1115 1 4
Utah 191 037-0085 800 S via Main St (SR191) - 200 N Blanding 3026 826 3102 847 3692 1008 3732 1048 1 4
Utah 191 037-0090 200 N Blanding via Main St (SR191) - Dodge Point 3309 953 3392 977 4037 1163 4077 1203 1 3
Utah 191 037-0100 Dodge Point via SR 191 - 4th S Monticello 2757 838 2826 859 3364 1023 3404 1063 1 4
Utah 191 037-0105 400 S via Main St (SR 191) - SR 491 (Center St) Monticello 3456 1106 3542 1134 4216 1349 4256 1389 1 3
Utah 191 037-0110 SR 491 (Center St) via Main St (SR 191) - 6th N Monticello 8626 2881 8842 2953 10524 3515 10564 3555 0.4 1
Utah 491 037-0171 500 E via Center St - Port of Entry Monticello 3804 1404 3899 1439 4641 1712 4681 1752 1 2
Utah 491 037-0175 Monticello POE via SR 491 - Colorado State Line *ATR* 324 3551 1310 3640 1343 4332 1599 4372 1639 1 2
Utah 491 037-0195 SR 491 E Monticello via Ucolo Lisbon Rd 113 116 0 138 0 163 25 15 100
Utah 24 055-0065 SR 95 Hanksville via SR 24 - Goblin Valley State Park 472 148 484 152 576 181 624 229 8 21
Utah 95 055-0085 SR 24 Hanksville via SR 95 - SR 276 *ATR* 414 756 130 775 133 922 159 970 207 5 23
Utah Garfield County Road 13383 5 0 5 0 6 0 84 78 93 100
Projected 2030
State Route Station Description
2022 Projected 2023
Parameter Locations Condition Frequency Method Analytical Parameters
Stack S-1 (ore dump pocket)Semiannually Grab sample and flow rate
Stack S-7 (yellowcake dryer)Quarterly
Isokinetic sample derived
from EPA stack method 5 and
flow rate
Environmental monitoring
stations During operations
Continuous; weekly filter change
or as required by dust loading;
quarterly composited
Composited filters sent to
offsite laboratory for analysis
Downwind of impoundment and
ore stockpiles During interimA operations Quarterly
Filter collection for 20 hours;
composited semiannually and
sent to offsite laboratory for
analysis
Natural uranium,
radium-226
Radon Environmental monitoring
stations During operations Quarterly Track etch or equivalent Radon-222
External
radiation
Environmental monitoring
stations During operations Quarterly OSLs
Vegetation Environmental monitoring
stations During operations Annually
Grab sample of forage three
times during spring growing
season
thorium-230, radium-
226, lead-210
Soil Environmental monitoring
stations During operations Annually Grab sample of surface soil
Natural uranium,
thorium-230, radium-
226
Meteorology Onsite meteorology station Continuous Continuous
Wildlife Tailings storage facility and
process ponds When fluids are present Daily Record visual observations
OSL - optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters
A Interim operations are defined as periods where the mill is NOT in operation for 30 days or more.
B - List of analytes in the annual groundwater monitoring sampling and analysis plan.
Table 7-1 Environmental Monitoring Excluding Groundwater
Airborne
Particulates
Stacks
Natural uranium,
thorium-230, radium-
226, lead-210
Table 7-2 Compliance Monitoring Wells
RM1 10226358.7 1873050.47 3 487 2.3 4449.4 220-480 157-487 225 L, S Yes Yes Submersible Pump Upgradient of Facility Semi-Annual
RM2R 10224989.2 1874379.63 5 300 1.2 4504.86 250-300 242-300 273 L, S Yes Yes Submersible Pump Operational
(Ore Stockpile)Semi-Annual
POC 1 **4**2**(a)**L, S Yes Yes Submersible Pump POC-Tailings
/Operations Semi-Annual
POC 2 **4**2**(a)**L, S Yes Yes Submersible Pump POC-Tailings
/Operations Semi-Annual
POC 3 **4**2**(a)**L, S Yes Yes Submersible Pump POC-Tailings
/Operations Semi-Annual
POC 4 **4**2**(a)**L, S Yes Yes Submersible Pump POC-Tailings
/Operations Semi-Annual
POC 5 **4**2**(a)**L, S Yes Yes Submersible Pump POC-Tailings
/Operations Semi-Annual
POC 6 **4**2**(a)**L, S Yes Yes Submersible Pump POC–Process
Pond/Operations Semi-Annual
POC 7 **4**2**(a)**L, S Yes Yes Submersible Pump POC–Process
Pond/Operations Semi-Annual
POC 8 **4**2**(a)**L, S Yes Yes Submersible Pump POC–Process
Pond/Operations Semi-Annual
POC 9 **4**2**(a)**L, S Yes Yes Submersible Pump POC-Tailings/Post-
Operations Semi-Annual
POC 10 **4**2**(a)**L, S Yes Yes Submersible Pump POC-Tailings/Post-
Operations Semi-Annual
(a) Field parameters are static water level, pH, temperature and conductivity
(b) Stabilized field parameters are pH and conductivity
L- Groundwater Level Measurement
S - Groundwater quality sample collection and analysis
POC - Point of Compliance
Coordinate system is local coordinates
lsd- depth below land surface
Sample Method Well Purpose FrequencyWellDataRecord Field
Parameters (a)
Record Stabilized
Field Parameters
(b)
Slotted
Casing
(ft - lsd)
Sand Pack
(ft - lsd)
Pump Intake
(ft - lsd)
North
Coordinate
South
Coordinate
Casing
Diameter (in)
Well Total
Depth
(ft -mp)
Stick up
(ft)
Measuring
Point
Elevation
(ft amsl)
Table 8-1 Summary of Environmental Consequences
Impacts Actions to Mitigate Impacts
Unavoidable Adverse/Irreversible and
Irretrievable Commitments of
Resources/Short-and Long-Term Impacts
Adverse Impacts Actions to Mitigate Impacts
Unavoidable Adverse/Irreversible and
Irretrievable Commitments of
Resources/Short-and Long-Term Impacts
Adverse Impacts Actions to Mitigate Impacts
Unavoidable Adverse/Irreversible and
Irretrievable Commitments of
Resources/Short-and Long-Term Impacts
Ecological Resource Impacts None NA NA
The South Cell and process ponds would have
fluid impounded that could potentially attract
wildlife.If wildlife were to solely use these
features,impacts could occur.The NRC assessed
impacts to terrestrial and aquatic biota (NRC,
1979)and determined that significant impacts
to wildlife were not expected but the actual
extent of those impacts could not be quantified.
Best management practices and potential
mitigation measures include placement of
reflective ribbon on T-posts and placement
of predatory decoy birds (i.e., falcons and
owls) around the pond perimeters to create
visual deterrents for bird use of the ponds.
None None NA NA
Occupational Health Impacts
The No Action Alternative has a low
potential for occupational exposure
because routine activities are conducted by
one person and routine monitoring not
milling is occuring . Public exposure to
contaminated soil and tailings could occur.
It is unlikely that any member of the public
will have the potential to exceed 100
mrem/year which is the public dose limit.
Use personal protective equipment,
training, and monitoring. Public exposure
pathway eliminated through land
ownership and long-term active
containment.
NA
Overall intermediate occupational risks from
operations and maintenance activities. Public
exposure to contaminated soil and tailings
could occur. It is unlikely that any member of
the public will have the potential to exceed 100
mrem/year which is the public dose limit.
Use personal protective equipment,
training, and monitoring. Public exposure
pathway eliminated through land
ownership and long-term active
containment.
None
Occupational exposures related to one-
time decomissioning and reclaiming of
Facility which has previously been
identified in the approved Reclamation
Plan.Public exposure to contaminated soil
and tailings could occur.It is unlikely that
any member of the public will have the
potential to exceed 100 mrem/year which
is the public dose limit.
Use personal protective equipment,
training, and monitoring. Public exposure
pathway eliminated through land
ownership and long-term active
containment.
None
Geology and Soil None NA NA
Excavation of soil impacted by a 1982 tailings
spill and grading of the area for South Cell
construction and excavation and construction
of the process ponds in portions of areas that
have not previously been disturbed.Soil in this
area is predominantly Badland-Rock outcrop
complex with some Moenkopie fine sandy loam.
The removal of the impacted soil and grading for
construction of the South Cell will cause
irretrievable loss of less than one acre of the soil
and bedrock,if any,in this area.As discussed in
Section 3.7,the Badland-Rock outcrop complex
has limited use for wildlife and is not suitable for
grazing.Additionally,borrow sources would be
disturbed as discussed in Exhibit B.3 of the
License Renewal Application to provide material
to complete the reclamation of the Facility.Soil
and rock would be lost in those areas as well.
Regrade and reseed borrow areas.
Rock and soil in the area of the tailings
storage facilty and in borrow areas would
be irreversible and irretrievable
commitments of resources.
The impacts to the borrow areas would
potentially be short term as these areas will
be reseeded with an approved see mix.
Excavation of soil impacted by the 1982
tailings spill and other impacted soil in
areas that were previously disturbed.The
disturbance would likely involve less than
one acre of the Badland-Rock outcrop
complex soil.Additionally,borrow
sources would be disturbed as discussed in
the approved Reclamation Plan (Hydro-
Engineering,2005)to provide material to
complete the reclamation of the Facility.
Soil and rock would be lost in those areas
as well.
Regrade and reseed borrow areas.
Rock and soil in in borrow areas would be
irreversible and irretrievable commitments
of resources.
The impacts to the borrow areas would
potentially be short term as these areas will
be reseeded with an approved see mix.
Air Quality Impacts None NA NA
The Proposed Action could potentially cause
impacts to the local ambient air quality from
fugitive dust and vehicle exhaust as a result of
excavation,grading,hauling,truck and
personnel vehicle travel to and from the Facility,
the use of diesel generators,and radon from the
tailings storage facility.The nearest resident is
more than one mile from the Facility and any
potential impacts to air quality would be local.
Air quality impacts during operational phases of
the mill are expected to be below Federal and
State standards.Anfield will control fugitive
dust and radon releases from the tailings
impoundment through spraying and interim
soil covers.Spraying will be used to control dust
emissions from ore stockpiles which are not
immediately processed.
Anfield will control fugitive dust and radon
releases from the tailings impoundment
through spraying and interim soil covers.
Spraying will be used to control dust
emissions from ore stockpiles which are not
immediately processed and on roads.
None
Short-term impacts to the local ambient
air quality from fugitive dust and vehicle
exhaust may occur as a result of
excavation,grading,and hauling activities.
The NRC (2003)identified that given the
short duration of decommissioning and
reclamation and the sparse population,no
significant adverse impacts to members of
the public would occur.
Anfield will control fugitive dust and radon
releases from the tailings impoundment
through spraying and final covers. Spraying
will be used to control dust emissions.
None
Alternative 3 - Reclamation and Decommissioning
Affected Environment
Alternative 1 - No Action Alternative Alternative 2 - Proposed Action
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

FIGURES
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 1-1
Location of Shootaring Canyon
Uranium Milling Facility
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 1-2
Land Ownership
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 1-3
Facility Features
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 1-4
Proposed Action
Facility Features
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: April 2024
FILE:
Figure 1-5
Proposed Action
Process Flow Diagram
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 1-6
Proposed Action
Tailings Storage Facility Cross Section
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 2-1
Alternative 3
Tailings Storage Facility Reclamation
Source: Hydro-Engineering, 2005
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 2-2
Alternative 3
Facility Features
Source: Hydro-Engineering, 2005
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 2-3
Alternative 3
Tailings Storage Facility Cover Cross Section
Source: Hydro-Engineering, 2005
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-1
Bureau of Land Management
Grazing Allotments
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-2
Bureau of Land Management
Natural Area
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-3
Land Cover
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-4
Populated Area
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-5
Nearest Residence
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-6
2020 Census Population
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-7
Transportation Corridors
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-8
Facility Roads
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-9
Traffic Count Stations
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-10
Henry Mountains Basin Cross Section
Source: Hydro-Engineering, 2005
Facility
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
Source: Hunt, et. al., 1939
Property Boundary
FIGURE 3-11
Regional Geologic Map
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-12
Facility Geologic Column
Modified from Tetra Tech, 2008
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-13
Facility Geologic Map
Source: Tetra Tech, 2008
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-14
Joint Orientations
Source: Woodward Clyde, 1978
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-15
Mapped Fractures and Joint Sets
Source: GeoTrans, 2008
PZ3
PZ2
PZ1
PZ4PZ5
PZ6
RM
1
RM2
R
M
3
R
M
4
R
M
5
R
M
6
RM
7
RM
8
RM9
R
M
1
0
R
M
1
1
RM
1
2
R
M
1
3
RM
1
4
R
M
1
5
OW
3
O
W
4
WW
1
OW
2
OW
1
B
OW
1
A
950
'
WW
2
580'
SCALE: 1"=250'
MILL
OFFICE
RM17
RM4R
RM16
RM
2
R
CROSS VALLEY BERM
SHOO
T
A
R
I
N
G

D
A
M
RM
1
9
RM
1
8
RM
2
1
RM
2
2
RM
2
0
(AFTER HYDRO-ENGINEERING, 1998)
RM1
RM8
PZ1-PZ3
ENTRADA WELL
PERCHED WATER ZONE WELL
DAM PIEZOMETER
OW3
OW4 CARMEL WELL
NAVAJO WELL
--LEGEND--
ABANDONED WELL (NAME UNDERLINED)RM10RM9
1'
3
2
2'
3'
1
LIMITS OF EXISTING
TAILINGS
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
FIGURE 3-16
LOCATION OF WELLS AND GEOLOGIC
CROSS SECTIONS
PROJECT:
DATE:
FILE:
ANFIELD
FEBRUARY 2024
2024-01-Basemap
?
2000 600400400
300
1
200
100
RM11
NEUTRON (API)
9000
0
27001800
100
300
200
CARMEL FORMATION
400
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
?
4000200400 600
300
200
100
NEUTRON (API)
18000900
0
2700
400
0 200 400 600
2000 400600
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
300
200
1800
NEUTRON (API)
WELL RM150
900
700
WELL RM5
NEUTRON (API)
0 900 1800 2700
100
0
2700
ENTRADA SANDSTONE
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
6000200400400
300
200
100
900
NEUTRON (API)
0
0 27001800
1'
?
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
WELL
RM16WELL
RM4WELL RM4RWELL
RM6WELL
RM13WELL
RM17WELL
(OFFSET)
400
300
200
100
0
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
0 700350
0 2700
1700SANDSTONE
LOWER K
SANDSTONE
LOWER K
4200
3950
4000
3900
4150
4050
4100
4300
4350
4250
4500
4400
4450
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
,

F
T
-
M
S
L
4240.35 4251.44 4239.724239.70 4238.82 4236.05 4238.07 4245.214243.58
ABANDONED WELL DATA (12/03)
(AFTER HYDRO-ENGINEERING, 1998)
EXISTING LAND SURFACE
WELL DEPTH PRIOR
DEEPENING IN 1999
WELL LOCATION, TOTAL DEPTH, AND
SLOTTED OR OPEN HOLE INTERVAL
?
?
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
FIGURE 3-17
GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION 1-1'
PROJECT:
DATE:
FILE:
ANFIELD
MARCH 2024
2023-11-XSECT-FIGS
WELL RM2
4200
3950
4000
3900
4150
4050
4100
0400
300
600200400
NEUTRON (API)
WELL RM3
4300
4350
4250
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
200
100
2
4500
4400
4450 0
0 27009001800
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
6004000200400
300
200
2700
WELL RM7
100
NEUTRON (API)
0
0 900 1800
2000400 600400
300
200
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
NEUTRON (API)
100
900
0
0 27001800
2'
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
,

F
T
-
M
S
L
ENTRADA SANDSTONE
CARMEL FORMATION
EXISITNG LAND SURFACE
WELL
RM2R
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
6004000200400
300
200
2700
WELL RM18
100
NEUTRON (API)
0
0 900 1800
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
6004000200400
300
200
2700
WELL RM19
100
NEUTRON (API)
0
0 900 1800
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
6004000200400
300
200
2700
WELL RM14
100
NEUTRON (API)
0
0 900 1800
4246.52
4256.94
4255.05 4255.26 4261.37
ABANDONED WELL DATA (12/03)
ACTIVE AND MONITORED WELL DATA (11/23)
(AFTER HYDRO-ENGINEERING, 1998)
4260.26
NOTE:
WELLS RM20 AND RM21 ADJACENT TO WELLS RM18 AND RM19
DO NOT SHOW ANY SATURATION IN THE UPPER ENTRADA
ABOVE THE ENTRADA WATER TABLE.
TOP OF CLAY LINER
BELOW TAILINGS
WELL LOCATION, TOTAL DEPTH, AND
SLOTTED OR OPEN HOLE INTERVAL
?
?
?
?
?
?
??
?
?
LOWER K
SANDSTONE
LOWER K
SANDSTONELOWER K
SANDSTONE
?
??
4253.49
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
FIGURE 3-18
GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION 2-2'
PROJECT:
DATE:
FILE:
181692
MARCH 2024
2013-01-XSECT-FIGS
CARMEL FORMATION
ENTRADA SANDSTONE
SANDSTONE
LOWER K
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
400 0
200
300
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
200 400 600
400
?200
300
NEUTRON (API)
900
WELL RM15
100
0
0
3
1800 2700 0
100
6004002000
?
18009000 2700
WELL RM9
NEUTRON (API)
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
400
200
300
6000200400
0
100
0
NEUTRON (API)
WELL RM7
27009001800
ENTRADA SANDSTONE
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
300
400 0 200 400 600
NEUTRON (API)
WELL RM1
100
200
0
0 900 1800
3'
2700
?
X-VALLEY BERMSHOOTARING DAM NORTH DIKE
WELLRM12
WELL T4
WELLRM10
700 2700
7000400
300
200
100
0
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
1700
350
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
6004000200400
300
200
2700
WELL RM20
100
NEUTRON (API)
0
0 900 1800
LOWER K SANDSTONE
4200
3950
4000
3900
4150
4050
4100
4300
4350
4250
4500
4400
4450
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
,

F
T
-
M
S
L
4271.654271.50
4253.494248.37
4308.01
4248.27 4236.05
ABANDONED WELL DATA (12/03)
ACTIVE AND MONITORED WELL DATA (11/23)
4327.25WELL RM8
(AFTER HYDRO-ENGINEERING, 1998)
NOTE:
RM8 DEFINES UPPER WATER LEVEL
ADJACENT TO RM20. WELLS RM7, RM14,
RM21 AND RM22 SHOW THAT THE UPPER
SATURATION DOES NOT EXTEND TO THESE
AREAS.
TOP OF CLAY LINER
BELOW TAILINGS
EXISTING LAND
SURFACE
WELL LOCATION, TOTAL DEPTH, AND
SLOTTED OR OPEN HOLE INTERVAL
?
??
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
FIGURE 3-19
GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION 3-3'
PROJECT:
DATE:
FILE:
181692
MARCH 2024
2013-01-XSECT-FIGS
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-20
Soil Units
4271.50
4260.26
4256.94
4255.264253.49
4255.05
PZ1
PZ4PZ5
PZ6
RM1
RM3
RM4 RM5 RM6
RM7
RM10RM11
RM12
RM13
RM14
RM15
RM17
RM4R
RM16
RM19
RM18
RM21RM22
4271.65
<4289.7 <4280.3
MILL
AREA
CROSS VALLEY
BERM
NORTH
CELL
MAIN
TAILINGS
DAM
SOUTH
CELL
PZ2
PZ3RM9
4327.25
4248.68RM8RM20
EXISTING TAILINGS
DISPOSAL CELL
4305 4
3
0
0
42
9
5
42
9
0
4
3
1
5
43
1
0
4
3
0
5
4
3
0
0
42854280
RM2
RM2R
4270
4265
4260
4255
4250
4245
4260
4260.26 MILL
AREA
OW3 OW4
WW1
OW2
OW1B
OW1A
4234.2
4250.6 (1/16/04)
RM2
RM2R
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
FIGURE 3-21
GROUNDWATER ELEVATION IN THE PERCHED
ZONE AND ENTRADA AQUIFER,
NOVEMBER 2023
PROJECT:
DATE:
FILE:
ANFIELD
FEBRUARY 2024
2024-01-Basemap
SCALE: 1"=250'
(AFTER HYDRO-ENGINEERING, 1998)
--LEGEND--
4254.22
4325.95
NOTE:
WATER-LEVEL ELEVATION FOR THE MAIN
ENTRADA AQUIFER IN THIS SOUTHERN
AREA IS BASED ON 2003 DATA.
WATER-LEVEL ELEVATION IN FEET-msl
PERCHED WATER ZONE
ENTRADA PIEZOMETRIC SURFACE
PERCHED WATER ZONE PIEZOMETRIC SURFACE
RM1
RM8
PZ3
ENTRADA WELL
PERCHED WATER ZONE WELL
DAM PIEZOMETER
OW3
OW4 CARMEL WELL
NAVAJO WELL
0 200 400
Scale 1" = 400'
INSET
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-22
Time Series of Measured Groundwater Elevations
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-23
Water Levels and Calculated Vertical
Gradient between RM8 and RM20
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-24
Formations and Deep Wells
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-25
Hansen Creek Watershed
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: April 2024
FILE:
Figure 3-26
Seeps or Springs
Identified in 1984
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-27
Groundwater Wells within 50 Square Miles
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-28
Proposed Environmental Air Monitoring Locations
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-29
Cultural Survey Areas
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-30
View of Facility from Highway 276
Facility
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-31
View of Facility from Nearest Resident
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-32
National Units within
50-mile radius of the Facility
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 7-1
Proposed Environmental Monitoring Locations
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 7-2
Operational Groundwater
Monitoring Locations
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 7-3
Groundwater Monitoring Wells
Post-Operations
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

APPENDIX A
BASELINE WILDLIFE AND VEGETATION SURVEY OF THE FACILITY

Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey
of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site,
Garfield County, Utah

Prepared for:

Uranium One

3801 Automation Way
Fort Collins, Colorado 80525
[phone]

Prepared by:

Tetra Tech

3801 Automation Way, Suite 100
Fort Collins, Colorado 80525
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Tetra Tech Project No. 181692/113

July 8, 2008

Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site Uranium One
Tetra Tech July 8, 2008 i
TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................1
1.1 Project Description......................................................................................................1
1.2 Site Description...........................................................................................................1
2.0 WILDLIFE HABITAT SURVEY ..............................................................................................4
2.1 Key Animal Species on Proposed Project Site ...........................................................4
2.2 Wildlife Observation Methods .....................................................................................5
2.2.1 Avian Species ............................................................................................................7
2.2.2 Mammals....................................................................................................................8
2.2.3 Reptiles and Amphibians...........................................................................................8
2.3 Wildlife Observation Results .......................................................................................8
2.3.1 Avian..........................................................................................................................8
2.3.2 Mammals....................................................................................................................9
2.3.3 Reptiles and Amphibians...........................................................................................9
3.0 VEGETATION SURVEY.......................................................................................................10
3.1 Vegetation Survey Methods......................................................................................10
3.2 Vegetation Survey Results........................................................................................10
3.3 Rare Plant Survey.....................................................................................................10
3.4 Noxious Weed Survey...............................................................................................13
4.0 CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................................................................15
5.0 REFERENCES .....................................................................................................................16

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1. List of Garfield County Animal Species of Concern........................................................4
Table 2. List of Animal Species of Concern with Potential Habitat at the Shootaring Mill Site .....5
Table 3. Avian Species Observed During the Shootaring Mill Site Survey...................................9
Table 4. Mammal Species Observed During the Shootaring Mill Site Survey..............................9
Table 5. Vegetation Species Observed During the June 2008 Shootaring Mill Site Survey......10
Table 6. Federally Listed Threatened and Rare Species in Garfield County, Utah ...................12
Table 7. Utah State Listed Noxious Weeds ...............................................................................13

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1. Location of Shootaring Canyon Processing Facility .....................................................2
Figure 2. Existing Conditions, Shootaring Canyon Uranium Mill Site ..........................................3

Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site Uranium One
Tetra Tech July 8, 2008 ii

LIST OF PHOTOS
Photo 1. Example of a Typical Wildlife Observation Point...........................................................6
Photo 2. Tailings Cell Area at the Shootaring Mill Site .................................................................7
Photo 3. Salt Cedar (Tamarix ramosissimaan) at Base of Dam ................................................14

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix A: Garfield County Species of Concern

Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site Uranium One
Tetra Tech July 8, 2008 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Description
The Shootaring Canyon Uranium Processing Facility (Mill) is located 5.6 km (2.6 miles) north of
the town of Ticaboo, Utah in Garfield County Utah (Figure 1). Until recently the inoperable mill
was owned by Plateau resources. Plateau resources operated the mill for a brief period in 1982,
but the mill has been decommissioned since that period. Recent interest in uranium has enticed
Uranium One, Inc. to purchase and reopen the mill. Revisions to the long-term design for the
tailings storage facility, which consist of constructing two 40-acre cells, and making the facility
feasible for operations, are underway. Uranium One is planning to resume operations as soon
as these improvements to the facility are complete and approval of the Renewal License
Application is obtained from the Division of Radiation Control, Utah Department of
Environmental Quality.

Baseline wildlife and vegetation surveys were conducted in anticipation of operation
commencement. Pursuant to Utah Rule 313-24-3 a re-evaluation of site conditions is required to
update the existing Environmental Report (ER). The objective of the surveys was to assess the
study area for habitat associated with special status animal species and to characterize the
vegetation in the study area. The surveys included:

ƒ A ground survey to assess potential special status animal species habitat within and
nearby areas of proposed development,
ƒ A general bird and mammal identification survey, and
ƒ Vegetation characterization (includes T&E, noxious weeds and wetland/riparian
habitat).

The surveys were conducted in compliance with the regulations set forth in the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and Utah Rule 68-9 (Utah Noxious Weed Act). The field work
was conducted by Ms. Simone Vannoy and Mr. Vic Meyer.

1.2 Site Description
The Mill site is encircled by a fence encompassing 265 acres (Figure 2). The area includes an
existing tailings site, a milling area, an ore stockpile area, and a quarry area. The wildlife and
vegetation survey occurred within this fenced area.

The climate in the area is classified as arid with an average annual precipitation of
approximately 7 inches. The majority of the precipitation is in the form of rain. Average annual
snowfall depth is approximately 12 inches. Average annual evaporation for the area is
approximately 66 inches. Temperatures in the area range from -33 degrees F to 97 degrees F
(Lyntek, 2008).

The Mill site is located within a valley that narrows to the south of the existing South Dam.
There is a steep butte that runs along the west side of the property with elevations over 4,700
feet above mean sea level (AMSL), whereas much of the Mill site ranges in elevation from 4,360
to 4,470 feet AMSL. A number of low-lying sandstone mesas are located across the site.
These types of cliffs and mesas can be important habitat for cliff nesting animals such as
raptors, cliff swallows (Petrochelidon pyrrhonota), and Mexican spotted owls (Strix occidentalis).
Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site Uranium One
Tetra Tech July 8, 2008 2

Figure 1. Location of Shootaring Canyon Processing Facility

Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site Uranium One
Tetra Tech July 8, 2008 4
2.0 WILDLIFE HABITAT SURVEY
2.1 Key Animal Species on Proposed Project Site
Table 1 lists all the designated species of special concern in Garfield County, Utah. This
includes federally and state listed endangered or threatened (T&E) species, species of concern,
and those receiving special management under a conservation agreement. Many of these
species require wetland or riparian habitat, which were not found and are not known to occur on
the Site. These species are generally found in the Henry Mountains located approximately 25
miles north west of the Mill site. Also located within Garfield County is a portion of the Colorado
River, located about 20 miles to the south of the Mill site. Due to lack of sufficient habitat, many
of the animals listed in Table 1 can be excluded from this survey. Table 2 lists only those
species of concern with the potential to inhabit the Mill site. Appendix A lists all the species of
concern, their associated habitat, and an explanation as to their potential occurrence at the Mill
site.

Table 1. List of Garfield County Animal Species of Concern
Common Name Scientific Name State Status
Amphibians and Reptiles
Arizona Toad Bufo microscaphus SPC
Common Chuckwalla Sauromalus ater SPC
Desert Night Lizard Xantusia vigilis SPC
Western Toad Bufo Boreas SPC
Avian
American white Pelican Pelecanus erythrorhynchos SPC
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus S-ESA
Burrowing Owl Athene cunicularia SPC
California Condor Gymnogyps californianus S-ESA
Ferruginous Hawk Buteo regalis SPC
Greater Sage-Grouse Centrocercus Urophasianus SPC
Lewis’s Woodpecker Melanerpes lewis SPC
Long-Billed Curlew Numenius americanus SPC
Northern Goshawk Accipiter gentilis CS
Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus SPC
Prairie Falcon Falco mexicanus SPC
Short-eared Owl Asio flammeus SPC
Southwestern Willow Flycatcher Empidonax traillii extimus S-ESA
Spotted Owl Strix occidentalis S-ESA
Three-toed Woodpecker Picoides tridactylus SPC
Yellow-billed Cuckoo Coccyzus americanus S-ESA
Fishes
Bluehead Sucker Catastomus discobolus CS
Bonneville Cutthroat Trout Oncorhynchus clarkii utah CS
Bonytail Gila elegans S-ESA
Colorado Pike Minnow Ptychocheilus lucius S-ESA
Colorado River Cutthroat Trout Oncorhynchus clarkii pleuriticus CS
Flannelmouth Sucker Catostomus latipinnis CS
Humpback Chub Gila cypha S-ESA
Leatherside Chub Gila copei SPC
Roundtail Chub Gila robusta CS
Gastropods
Black Canyon Pyrg Pyrgulopsis plicata SPC
Utah Physa Physella utahensis SPC
Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site Uranium One
Tetra Tech July 8, 2008 5
Table 1. List of Garfield County Animal Species of Concern (continued)
Common Name Scientific Name State Status
Mammals
Allen’s Big-eared Bat Idionycteris phyllotis SPC
Big Free-tailed Bat Nyctinomops macrotis SPC
Brown Grizzly Bear Ursus arctos S-ESA
Fringed Myotis Myotis thysanodes SPC
Henry Mountain Bison Herd Bos bison SPC
Kit Fox Vulpes macrotis SPC
Mule Deer Odocoileus hemiounus SPC
Pygmy Rabbit Brachylagus idahoensis SPC
Spotted Bat Euderma maculatum SPC
Townsend’s Big-eared Bat Corynorhinus townsendii SPC
Utah Prairie Dog Cynomys parvidens S-ESA
Western Red Bat Lasiurus blossevillii SPC
S-ESA Federally-listed or candidate species under the Endangered Species Act.
SPC Wildlife species of concern.
CS Species receiving special management under a Conservation Agreement in order to preclude the need
for Federal listing.
Utah Division of Wildlife, 2007

Table 2. List of Animal Species of Concern with Potential Habitat at the Shootaring Mill
Site
Common Name Scientific Name Status
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus S-ESA
Big Free-tailed Bat Nyctinomops macrotis SPC
Burrowing Owl Athene cunicularia SPC
California Condor Gymnogyps californianus S-ESA
Ferruginous Hawk Buteo regalis SPC
Fringed Myotis Myotis thysanodes SPC
Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus SPC
Prairie Falcon Falco mexicanus SPC
Short-eared Owl Asio flammeus SPC
Spotted Bat Euderma maculatum SPC
Spotted Owl Strix occidentalis S-ESA
Townsend’s Big-eared Bat Corynorhinus townsendii SPC
S-ESA Federally-listed or candidate species under the Endangered Species Act.
SPC Wildlife species of concern.
CS Species receiving special management under a Conservation Agreement in order to preclude the need
for Federal listing.

2.2 Wildlife Observation Methods
The survey was conducted June 4, 2008 by Tetra Tech biologists Vic Meyer and Simone
Vannoy. Observations were made throughout the day. The morning temperature was 71
degrees F, with overcast skies. There was a fresh wind of 19 to 24 mph (Beaufort scale code 5).
The mid-day temperature was 77 degrees F with cloudy skies and rain clouds to the northwest.
There was a fresh wind of 19 to 24 mph (Beaufort scale code 5). The afternoon temperature
was 77 degrees F, partly cloudy and stormy skies to the north. There were moderate winds of
13 mph (Beaufort scale code of 4). Later that evening a severe storm moved through the area
with extremely strong winds and rain.

Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site Uranium One
Tetra Tech July 8, 2008 6
All roads surrounding the Mill site were driven on June 4, 2008 in both the morning and
afternoon surveys, escorted by an employee of Uranium One. Due to a high level of security at
the Mill site, the survey was not allowed to take place unaccompanied. The midday survey
occurred outside the parameters of the Mill site in order to observe the cliffs for long periods of
time. Several observation points were established from which to observe wildlife. Photo 1 shows
an example of a typical observation point. Cliffs, trees, and sky were observed for signs of
animals for ten to twenty minutes at each point. Observations also took place en route between
observation points.

Photo 1. Example of a Typical Wildlife Observation Point

On-foot surveys were conducted in areas of particularly good habitat or when signs of wildlife
were observed (e.g. nests, animal tracks, or searching for nests of observed birds). On foot
surveys were also conducted at each of the tailings cell areas to identify the potential use of
these areas by wildlife species (Photo 2).

Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site Uranium One
Tetra Tech July 8, 2008 7

Photo 2. Tailings Cell Area at the Shootaring Mill Site

2.2.1 Avian Species
2.2.1.1 Special Status Species
A Mexican spotted owl (Strix occidentalis) survey was conducted during daylight hours to
investigate the potential for habitat. It was concluded that there is not sufficient habitat for the
owl at the Mill site; therefore, night time owl calling survey was not conducted. Previous spotted
owl surveys at nearby mining facilities have not indicated the presence of spotted owls in this
area of Garfield County.

Observations for suitable burrowing owl habitat were made during daylight hours. Burrowing owl
habitat consists of open meadow areas and is usually associated with prairie dog, ground
squirrel, badger or armadillo burrows. All areas with meadow or grassland characteristics at the
Mill site were walked in order to identify burrowing owl habitat. Short-eared owls are found in
open habitats such as grasslands and shrublands. All such areas were inspected for relevant
habitat.

Several species of raptor are included in the Garfield County list of species of special concern
(Table 1). All raptor species, regardless of their protection status were included in the survey.
Surveys were conducted under the guidelines established by the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS 1999).

Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site Uranium One
Tetra Tech July 8, 2008 8
2.2.1.2 Other Avian Species
Appendix A lists all the avian species of concern for Garfield County and their habitat
requirements. Aside from the above listed raptor species, no other Garfield County bird species
with special status were determined to have habitat at the Mill site. A general bird survey was
conducted to identify the species that may be using the Mill site.

2.2.2 Mammals
2.2.2.1 Special Status Species
Four bat species of special concern have the potential to occur at the Mill site (Table 2). They
are the big free-tailed bat (Nyctinomops macrotis), fringed myotis (Myotis thysanodes), spotted
bat (Euderma maculatum), and Townsend’s big-eared bat (Corynorhinus townsendii). These
bats prefer wooded or forested areas, but at times can be found in man-made structures.
Observations for roosting habitat were made in the daylight hours. Due to the strict security
policy at the Mill site and the severe evening storm, nighttime observations for bats was not
possible.

2.2.2.2 Other Mammal Species
A general mammalian survey was conducted to identify the species that may inhabit the Mill
site. Rabbits, coyotes (Canis latrans) and small rodents are known to inhabit this particular area
of Garfield County, Utah. All areas were carefully inspected for tracks, scat, signs of foraging,
and any other signs of mammalian presence.

2.2.3 Reptiles and Amphibians
No reptile or amphibian species of special concern habitat exist at the Mill site. Amphibian
species require aquatic habitat and the Mill site is completely devoid of all but ephemeral
drainage creeks, which are not suitable habitat for amphibious species. Opportunistic
observations of reptiles were made while walking the Mill site.

2.3 Wildlife Observation Results
The results of the biological surveys conducted at the Mill site on June 4, 2008 are presented in
the following section.

2.3.1 Avian
2.3.1.1 Special Status Species
No nesting habitat for burrowing owls, spotted owls or short-eared owls were observed. There
were no signs of owl presence with in the areas walked at the Mill site. There were very few
areas of potential raptor nesting habitat. No raptor nests or raptor signs (scat, feathers, etc.)
were observed.

2.3.1.2 Other Avian Species
A complete list of bird species observed at the Mill site can be found in Table 3. Common birds
of the area include horned larks (Eremophila alpestris) and common ravens (Corvus corax).
Most of the avian species observed were along the east fence of the property. A female chukar
with 8 chicks was seen in this area, attracting the attention of two nearby ravens.

Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site Uranium One
Tetra Tech July 8, 2008 9
Table 3. Avian Species Observed During the Shootaring Mill Site Survey
Common Name Scientific Name Notes
American Crow Corvus brachyrhynchos
One individual seen flying in the
distance, off property
Chukar Alectoris chukar Female with 8 young
Common Raven Corvus corax Several seen throughout site
Horned lark Eremophila alpestris Observed and heard singing
Mourning Doves Zenaida macroura Several seen throughout site
Song Sparrow Melospiza melodia Near Dam
Songbird Species not verified Several unidentified species
Sparrows Species not verified Several unidentified species
Starlings Sturnus vulgaris
Two starling like birds in the
distance in the tailings cell
Swallow Species not verified Several near cliffs
Western King Bird Tyrannus verticalis SE of Buildings Near Water Tank

2.3.2 Mammals
2.3.2.1 Special Status Species
Daytime surveys for potential bat habitat were conducted. No roosting areas or cliff ledges
containing bat guano were identified. The lack of a water source and wooded habitat more than
likely discourages large bat populations at the Mill site.

2.3.2.2 Other Mammal Species
Coyote (Canis latrans) scat was seen in several areas near the dam. However, no coyote were
observed during the survey. Second hand testimony of a bobcat sighting near the east fence by
an employee was reported. Cottontail rabbits and Hopi chipmunks were abundant along the
east fence of the property. Table 4 summarized the mammal observations.

Table 4. Mammal Species Observed During the Shootaring Mill Site Survey
Common Name Scientific Name Notes
Coyote Canis latrans Scat
Desert Cottontail Sylvilagus audubonii Several Individuals and Scat
Hopi Chipmunk Neotamius rufus
Several Individuals, mainly along
east boundary fence.

2.3.3 Reptiles and Amphibians
Only one lizard was seen during the Mill site survey. A positive identification of the lizard was
not made. No snakes or signs of other reptiles (tracks, skin, etc.) were observed on the Mill
site.

Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site Uranium One
Tetra Tech July 8, 2008 10
3.0 VEGETATION SURVEY
3.1 Vegetation Survey Methods
Prior to field activities, existing information was reviewed to determine the potential occurrence
of Threatened and Endangered species, rare species, noxious weeds, and wetland species.

The vegetation community within the Mill site boundaries was characterized during the June
2008 visit. The survey focused on disturbed and undisturbed portions of the Mill site. The
vegetation survey was performed on foot, and species were identified and recorded when
encountered. The survey also focused on documenting rare, endangered, or sensitive species,
as well as noxious or invasive weeds.

3.2 Vegetation Survey Results
Vegetation at the new and existing tailings cells are predominantly shadscale saltbush (Atriplex
confertifolia), greasewood (Sarcaliatus vermiculatus) and sagebrush (Artemesia tridentate). A
small population of salt cedar (Tamarix ramosissima), an undesirable non-native invasive
species, was found at the base of the north side of the dam. Table 5 presents the results of the
vegetation survey.

Table 5. Vegetation Species Observed During the June 2008 Shootaring Mill Site Survey
Common Name Scientific Name
Black greasewood Sarcaliatus vermiculatus
Broom snakeweed Gutierrezia sarothrae
Cheat grass Bromus tectorum
Foxtail Alopecurus spp.
Green Mormon Tea Ephedra vividis
Milkvetch Astragalus spp.
Opuntia Opuntia spp
Rabbit brush Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus
Russian thistle Salsola spp.
Sage Artemisia spp
Salt cedar Tamarix ramosissima
Sand dropseed Sporobolus cryptandrus
Shadscale Saltbush Atriplex confertifolia
Spiny hopsage Grayia spinosa
Western salsify Tragopogon dubius
Yucca Yucca glauca

3.3 Rare Plant Survey
A review of listed T&E and rare plants of Garfield County revealed that the Mill could potentially
harbor two federally listed threatened species and several rare plant species. Species are listed
as threatened or rare due to a number of factors including habitat loss, population declines,
limited distribution, or any combination of these factors. The Mill site was inspected for the
Jones Cycladenia (Cycladenia humilis var. jonesii) and the Wright Fishhook Cactus
(Sclerocactus wrightiae), both are federally listed threatened plant species found in parts of
Garfield County, Utah. Table 6 presents the threatened and rare species of Garfield County.

Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site Uranium One
Tetra Tech July 8, 2008 11
A survey for threatened and rare species revealed that none of the listed species in Table 6
occur within the boundaries of the Mill site.

Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site Uranium One
Tetra Tech July 8, 2008 12
Table 6. Federally Listed Threatened and Rare Species in Garfield County, Utah
Common Name Scientific Name
Federally Threatened Species
Jones Cycladenia Cycladenia humilis var. jonesii
Wright Fishhook Cactus Sclerocactus wrightiae
Garfield County Rare Species
Yellow columbine Aquilegia flavescens var. rubicunda
Divided rockcress Arabis schistacea
Welsh's aster Aster welshii
Bicknell's milkvetch Astragalus consobrinus
Dana milkvetch Astragalus henrimontanensis
Cicada milkvetch Astragalus laccoliticus
Monti's milkvetch Astragalus limnocharis var. tabulaeus
Monument milkvetch Astragalus monumentalis
Ferron's milkvetch Astragalus musiniensis
Rydberg's milkvetch Astragalus perianus
Silver's milkvetch Astragalus subcinereus var. basalticus
Loa milkvetch Astragalus welshii
Peculiar moonwort Botrychium paradoxum
Creeping rush-pea Caesalpinia repens
Aquarius Plateau Indian paintbrush Castilleja aquariensis
Indian paintbrush species Castilleja parvula var. parvula
Bryce Canyon Indian paintbrush Castilleja parvula var. revealii
Yellowwhite cryptantha Cryptantha ochroleuca
Osterhout's cryptanth Cryptantha osterhoutii
Jones' waxydogbane Cycladenia humilis var. jonesii
Cedar Breaks springparsley Cymopterus minimus
Hole-in-the-Rock prairie-clover Dalea flavescens var. epica
Stream orchid Epipactis gigantea
Kachina daisy Erigeron kachinensis
Maguire's fleabane Erigeron maguirei
Professor's fleabane Erigeron proselyticus
Red Canyon buckwheat Eriogonum aretioides
Bull Mountain buckwheat Eriogonum corymbosum var. cronquistii
Paria spurge Euphorbia nephradenia
Oil shale fescue Festuca dasyclada
Cataract gilia Gilia latifolia var. imperialis
Alcove bog-orchid Habenaria zothecina
Subalpine goldenbush Haplopappus zionis
Jones' false goldenaster Heterotheca jonesii
Mountain pepperweed Lepidium montanum var. claronense
Elizabeth's pepperweed Lepidium montanum var. neeseae
Paria River Indian breadroot Pediomelum pariense
Sandloving penstemon Penstemon ammophilus
Red Canyon beardtongue Penstemon bracteatus
Tushar Range beardtongue Penstemon caespitosus var. suffruticosus
Aquarius Plateau beardtongue Penstemon parvus
Alcove rock-daisy Perityle specuicola
Phacelia species Phacelia sabulonum
Kane County twinpod Physaria lepidota var. membranacea
Cinquefoil species Potentilla angelliae
Fall buttercup Ranunculus aestivalis
Podunk ragwort Senecio malmstenii
Plateau catchfly Silene petersonii
Rock tansy Sphaeromeria capitata
Ute lady's tresses Spiranthes diluvialis
Moab woodyaster Xylorhiza glabriuscula var. linearifolia
USDA-NRCS PLANTS Database, 2008; Utah Rare Plant Guide, 2003
Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site Uranium One
Tetra Tech July 8, 2008 13
3.4 Noxious Weed Survey
A noxious weed is defined as a plant in any living stage, such as seeds and reproductive parts,
of any parasitic or other plant of a kind, which is of foreign origin, is new to or not widely
prevalent in the United States, and can directly or indirectly injure crops, other useful plants,
livestock, or poultry or other interests of agriculture, including irrigation, or navigation, or the fish
or wildlife resources of the United States or the public health (USDA 1974). Table 7 gives a
complete list of Utah State listed noxious weeds.
Russian thistle (Salsola spp.) was found in various areas throughout the Mill site. Salt cedar
(Tamarix ramosissima) was found at the base of the north side of the dam (Photo 3). Both
Russian thistle and salt cedar are considered undesirable invasive species and are frequently
listed on state noxious weed lists. Undesirable plant species are plants that are noxious, exotic,
injurious, or poisonous, pursuant to State or Federal law. These two species are not considered
noxious weeds and their control is not required by law but there is a potential that these plants
could spread to other portions of the property, producing adverse effects on native plant
populations at the Mill site.

Table 7. Utah State Listed Noxious Weeds
Common Name Scientific Name
Bermudagrass Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.1
Canada thistle Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop.
Diffuse knapweed Centaurea diffusa Lam.
Dyers woad Isatis tinctoria L.
Field bindweed Convolvulus arvensis L.
Hardheads Acroptilon repens (L.) DC.
Hoary cress Cardaria draba (L.) Desv.
Johnsongrass Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.
Leafy spurge Euphorbia esula L.
Medusahead Taeniatherum caput-medusae (L.) Nevski
Musk thistle Carduus nutans L.
Perennial pepperweed Lepidium latifolium L.
Perennial sorghum Sorghum almum Parodi
Purple loosestrife Lythrum salicaria L.
Quackgrass Elymus repens (L.) Gould
Russian knapweed Centaurea repens L.
Scotch thistle Onopordum acanthium L.
Spotted knapweed Centaurea stoebe L. ssp. micranthos (Gugler) Hayek
Squarrose knapweed Centaurea virgata Lam. ssp. squarrosa (Willd.) Gugler
Yellow starthistle Centaurea solstitialis L.

Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site Uranium One
Tetra Tech July 8, 2008 14

Photo 3. Salt Cedar (Tamarix ramosissimaan) at Base of Dam

Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site Uranium One
Tetra Tech July 8, 2008 15
4.0 CONCLUSIONS
Baseline wildlife and vegetation surveys were conducted on June 4, 2008 at the Shootaring
Canyon Uranium Processing Facility in Garfield County, Utah in order to determine the extent of
wildlife use at the Mill site and characterize the vegetation. The Mill is scheduled to begin
operations in the near future after revisions to the Mill are complete.

A general wildlife inventory was taken throughout the day of the study. Little wildlife was present
at the time of survey. Five raptor and three owl species of concern had the potential to occupy
the Mill site (Table 2). No raptor species or signs of raptor presence (nests, feathers, and
pellets) were observed. Owl habitat was not present at the Mill site. These results suggest that
the Mill site does not currently maintain breeding sites for raptor or owl species. Three bat
species of concern had the potential to occupy the Mill site. It was concluded during the survey
that habitat for these species is not present. The Mill site contained species of local, common
birds including horned larks, sparrows, and ravens. The only mammals observed on the Mill site
were desert cottontail rabbits and Hopi chipmunks. Evidence of coyote presence was seen near
the dam.

The vegetation characterization did not find any special status flora in the survey areas. No rare
or threatened plant species were found. Although one patch of salt cedar, as well as populations
of Russian thistle, were found at the Mill site, no Utah State noxious weed species were
identified.

Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site Uranium One
Tetra Tech July 8, 2008 16
5.0 REFERENCES

Lyntek, Inc., 2008. Definitive Cost Estimate for the Restart of the Shootaring Canyon Mill,
Ticaboo, Utah. March 28.

State of Utah Natural Resources Division of Wildlife Resources, “Utah Sensitive Species List”
August 2007. Internet, accessed May 2008.
http://dwrcdc.nr.utah.gov/ucdc/ViewReports/te_cnty.pdf

US Fish and Wildlife Service. 1999. “Utah Field Office Guidelines for Raptor Protection from
Human and Land Use Disturbances.” Utah Field Office, Salt Lake City, Utah.

US Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. “Mexican Spotted Owl Survey Protocol”. Albuquerque, New
Mexico.

US Fish and Wildlife Service “Federal and State Listed Species”. Internet, accessed May 2008.
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/wildlife.html

Utah Rare Plant Guide 2003. Internet, accessed May 2008.
http://www.utahrareplants.org/rpg_acknow.html

USDA. 1974. “Federal Noxious Weed Act”. Internet, accessed June 2008.
http://www.access.gpo.gov/uscode/title7/chapter61_.html

USDA, NRCS. 2008. The PLANTS Database. National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA
70874-4490 USA. Internet, accessed June 2008 http://plants.usda.gov

APPENDIX A
GARFIELD COUNTY SPECIES OF CONCERN

Garfield County Species of Concern
Common
Name
Scientific
Name
State
Status
Surveyed
Required?
Comments
Amphibians and Reptiles
Arizona Toad Bufo
microscaphus SPC No
This species inhabits streams, washes,
irrigated crop lands, reservoirs, and uplands
adjacent to water. A survey is not required
due to a lack of suitable habitat.
Common
Chuckwalla Sauromalus ater SPC No
Chuckwallas are predominantly found near
cliffs, boulders, or rocky slopes. They are
found near the Colorado River Basin in
Garfield County which is located 20 miles to
the south of the Mill site. A survey is not
required due to lack of habitat.
Desert Night
Lizard Xantusia vigilis SPC No
This species lives near Joshua trees and is
an insectivore. A survey is not required due
to lack of habitat.
Western Toad Bufo Boreas SPC
No
This species inhabits slow moving streams,
wetlands, desert springs, ponds, lakes,
meadows, and woodlands. A survey is not
required due to lack of habitat.
Avian
American White
Pelican
Pelecanus
erythrorhynchos SPC No
This species only breeds in the northern
portions of the state, specifically within the
Utah Lake/Great Salt Lake ecological
complex. It may migrate through Garfield
County stopping in the larger lakes. No
survey is required due to lack of habitat.
Bald Eagle
Haliaeetus
leucocephalus S-ESA Yes
Eagle habitat is generally near lakes and
rivers. Since they can fly great distances for
food and water they are included in the
survey.
Burrowing Owl
Athene
cunicularia SPC Yes
This owl's habitats are open grassland and
prairies. They are generally associated with
prairie dogs.
California
Condor
Gymnogyps
californianus S-ESA Yes
California condors prefer mountainous
country at low and moderate elevations,
especially rocky and brushy areas near
cliffs.
Ferruginous
Hawk Buteo regalis SPC Yes
These hawks are generally found flat and
rolling terrain in grassland or shrub steppe.
They prefer to nest high in trees or cliff
banks.
Greater Sage-
Grouse
Centrocercus
Urophasianus
SPC No This species inhabits sagebrush plains,
foothills, and mountain valleys and also
requires an understory of grasses and
forbs, and associated wet meadow areas. A
survey is not required due to a lack of
habitat.

Garfield County Species of Concern (continued)
Common
Name
Scientific
Name
State
Status
Surveyed
Required?
Comments
Avian (continued)
Lewis’s
Woodpecker Melanerpes lewis SPC No
This species prefers to build its nests in
ponderosa pine, cottonwood, or sycamore.
A survey is not required due to lack of
habitat.
Long-Billed
Curlew
Numenius
americanus SPC No
The curlew is rare but occasionally seen in
the Colorado River Basin, which is located
20 south of the project site. Due to lack of
habitat, no survey is required.
Northern
Goshawk Accipiter gentilis CS No
The northern goshawk prefers mature
mountain forest and riparian zone habitats.
Due to lack of habitat a survey is not
required.
Peregrine
Falcon Falco peregrinus SPC Yes
This falcon species is rare in the County
but is widely distributed throughout the
Country. It prefers to nest on tall cliffs.
Prairie Falcon Falco mexicanus SPC Yes
These birds are found in open habitats,
such as plains and prairies.
Short-eared Owl Asio flammeus SPC Yes
This species is most often found in open
habitats such as grasslands and
shrublands.
Southwestern
Willow
Flycatcher
Empidonax traillii
extimus S-ESA No
This passerine is found in riparian habitats,
especially in areas of dense willow. A
survey is not required due to a lack of
habitat.
Spotted Owl Strix occidentalis S-ESA Yes
This owl species can be found in steep
rocky canyons as well as various forest
types.
Three-toed
Woodpecker
Picoides
tridactylus SPC No
This species occupies areas of coniferous
forests, generally above 8,000 ft elevation.
A survey is not required due to a lack of
habitat.
Yellow-billed
Cuckoo
Coccyzus
americanus S-ESA No
Cuckoos require lowland riparian habitat. A
survey is not required due to a lack of
habitat.
Bluehead
Sucker
Catastomus
discobolus
CS No This species is found in river systems. The
nearest river is located 20 miles south of
the project site. A survey is not required
due to lack of habitat.
Bonneville
Cutthroat Trout
Oncorhynchus
clarkii utah
CS No This species is found in permanent lakes
and rivers. The nearest permanent water
source is located 20 miles south of the
project site. A survey is not required due to
lack of habitat.
Bonytail Gila elegans S-ESA No This species is found in the Colorado River
located 20 miles south of the project site. A
survey is not required due to lack of habitat.

Garfield County Species of Concern (continued)
Common
Name
Scientific
Name
State
Status
Surveyed
Required?
Comments
Fishes
Colorado Pike
Minnow
Ptychocheilus
lucius S-ESA No
This species is found in the Colorado River
located 20 miles south of the project site. A
survey is not required due to lack of habitat.
Colorado River
Cutthroat Trout
Oncorhynchus
clarkii pleuriticus CS No
This species is found in the Colorado River
located 20 miles south of the project site. A
survey is not required due to lack of habitat.
Flannelmouth
Sucker
Catostomus
latipinnis CS No
This species is found in the Colorado River
and in its larger tributaries. The nearest
river is located 20 miles south of the project
site. A survey is not required due to lack of
habitat.
Humpback
Chub Gila cypha S-ESA No
This species is found in the Colorado River
located 20 miles south of the project site. A
survey is not required due to lack of habitat.
Leatherside
Chub Gila copei SPC No
This species is native to streams and rivers
of the southeastern portion of the
Bonneville Basin located on the far Western
edge of Garfield County about 200 miles
from the project site.
Roundtail Chub Gila robusta CS No
This species is found in the Colorado River
located 20 miles south of the project site. A
survey is not required due to lack of habitat.
Mammals
Allen’s Big-
eared Bat
Idionycteris
phyllotis SPC No
This bat is found in rocky and riparian areas
in woodland and scrubland regions. No
survey is required due to lack of habitat.
Big Free-tailed
Bat
Nyctinomops
macrotis SPC Yes
The big free-tailed bat prefers rocky and
woodland habitats, where roosting occurs in
caves, mines, old buildings, and rock
crevices.
Brown (Grizzly)
Bear Ursus arctos S-ESA No Extirpated from Utah, no survey is required.
Fringed Myotis
Myotis
thysanodes SPC Yes
Aside from caves, this bat can be found in
mines and buildings in desert and woodland
areas.
Henry Mountain
Bison Herd Bos bison SPC No
Bison prefer plains, grassland, and open
woodland habitats with plenty of grasses
and some riparian habitat. Due to a lack of
habitat, a survey is not required.

Garfield County Species of Concern (continued)
Common
Name
Scientific
Name
State
Status
Surveyed
Required?
Comments
Mammals (continued)
Kit Fox Vulpes macrotis SPC No
This species is found in desert
landscape, but is currently only known
in the western most part of Garfield
County, so no survey is required.
Mule Deer
Odocoileus
hemiounus SPC No
The mule deer occupy open range
areas, grasses and some riparian
habitat. No survey is required due to
lack of habitat.
Pygmy Rabbit
Brachylagus
idahoensis SPC No
This small rabbit prefers areas with tall
dense sagebrush and loose soils. It is
not known to occur in Eastern Garfield
County, so no survey is required.
Spotted Bat
Euderma
maculatum SPC Yes
These bats are found in a variety of
habitats, ranging from deserts to
forested mountains; they roost and
hibernate in caves and rock crevices.
Western Red
Bat
Lasiurus
blossevillii SPC No
Western red bats are normally found
near water, often in wooded areas.
The species is nocturnal; daytime
roosting usually occurs in trees. Due to
lack of habitat, not included in survey.
Townsend’s
Big-eared Bat
Corynorhinus
townsendii SPC Yes
These bats are most often found near
forested areas but may use mines for
day roosting.
Utah Prairie
Dog
Cynomys
parvidens S-ESA No
This prairie dog is very rare and
generally only occurs in the
southwestern portion of Utah. No
survey is required due to lack of
habitat.
S-ESA Federally-listed or candidate species under the Endangered Species Act.
SPC Wildlife species of concern.
CS Species receiving special management under a Conservation Agreement in order to preclude the need
for Federal listing.

SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM MILLING FACILITY
LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION
ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT

Radioactive Material License UT 0900480

APRIL 2024

Submitted By:

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
10808 S. River Front Parkway
Suite 321
South Jordan, UT 84095

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

i Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
April 2024 Environmental Report

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................. 1
1.1 Purpose of Report ................................................................................................................ 1
1.2 Site Description .................................................................................................................... 1
1.3 Site History........................................................................................................................... 2
1.4 Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action ........................................................................ 2
1.5 The Proposed Action ........................................................................................................... 3
1.5.1 Mill Process and Equipment ................................................................................... 4
1.5.2 Sources of Plant Wastes, Control Equipment, and Instrumentation ..................... 5
2.0 ALTERNATIVES .................................................................................................................................. 7
2.1 Detailed Description of Alternatives ................................................................................... 7
2.1.1 No Action Alternative ............................................................................................. 7
2.1.2 Proposed Action ..................................................................................................... 7
2.1.2.1 Summary of Major Impacts of the Proposed Action .............................................. 7
2.1.3 Reasonable Alternatives ......................................................................................... 8
2.1.4 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated ................................................................ 8
2.2 Cumulative Effects ............................................................................................................... 8
3.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT .......................................................................... 10
3.1 Topography ........................................................................................................................ 10
3.2 Land Use/Land Cover ......................................................................................................... 10
3.3 Demography ...................................................................................................................... 10
3.4 Transportation ................................................................................................................... 12
3.4.1.1 Traffic .................................................................................................................... 12
3.4.1.2 Site Transportation Corridors ............................................................................... 13
3.5 Geologic Setting ................................................................................................................. 13
3.6 Geology .............................................................................................................................. 14
3.6.1 Regional Geology .................................................................................................. 14
3.6.2 Local Geology........................................................................................................ 14
3.6.3 Alluvium ................................................................................................................ 14
3.6.4 Entrada Sandstone ............................................................................................... 15
3.6.5 Carmel Formation ................................................................................................. 15
3.6.6 Navajo Sandstone ................................................................................................. 16
3.6.7 Local Geologic Data Interpretation ...................................................................... 16
3.7 Soil ..................................................................................................................................... 17
3.8 Hydrogeology..................................................................................................................... 18
3.8.1 Uppermost Aquifer (Entrada Sandstone) ............................................................. 18
3.8.2 Perched Water Zone ............................................................................................. 23
3.8.3 Carmel Formation ................................................................................................. 24
3.8.4 Navajo Sandstone ................................................................................................. 24
3.9 Water Resources................................................................................................................ 25
3.9.1 Surface Water ....................................................................................................... 25
3.9.2 Groundwater ........................................................................................................ 26
3.9.2.1 Groundwater Quality ............................................................................................ 26
3.9.3 Groundwater Use ................................................................................................. 26
3.10 Meteorology, Climatology, and Air Quality ....................................................................... 26
3.10.1 Local Meteorology and Climate ........................................................................... 26
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

ii Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
April 2024 Environmental Report

TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONCLUDED)

3.10.2 Severe Weather Events ........................................................................................ 27
3.11 Air Quality .......................................................................................................................... 28
3.12 Ecological Resources .......................................................................................................... 28
3.13 Noise .................................................................................................................................. 29
3.14 Historic and Cultural Resources......................................................................................... 29
3.15 Visual and Scenic Resources .............................................................................................. 30
3.16 Public and Occupational Health ........................................................................................ 30
3.17 Waste Management .......................................................................................................... 31
4.0 RADIOLOGICAL AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FROM PROPOSED ACTION .................. 32
4.1.1 Non-radiological Impacts ...................................................................................... 32
4.2 Environmental Effects of Accidents ................................................................................... 33
4.2.1 Trivial Incidents Involving Radioactivity ............................................................... 33
4.2.2 Small Release Involving Radioactivity .................................................................. 34
4.2.3 Large Release Involving Radioactivity .................................................................. 35
4.2.4 Transportation Accidents ..................................................................................... 36
4.2.5 Releases of Hazardous Chemicals ........................................................................ 38
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS............................................................................................................ 39
5.1 Topography ........................................................................................................................ 39
5.2 Land Use Impacts ............................................................................................................... 39
5.3 Demography and Socioeconomic Impacts ........................................................................ 39
5.4 Transportation Impacts ..................................................................................................... 40
5.4.1 Proposed Action ................................................................................................... 40
5.4.2 No Action Alternative ........................................................................................... 41
5.4.3 Alternative 3 ......................................................................................................... 41
5.5 Geology and Soil Impacts .................................................................................................. 41
5.6 Water Resources Impacts .................................................................................................. 42
5.7 Ecological Resources Impacts ............................................................................................ 42
5.8 Air Quality Impacts ............................................................................................................ 42
5.9 Noise Impacts .................................................................................................................... 43
5.10 Historic and Cultural Impacts ............................................................................................ 43
5.11 Visual/Scenic Resources Impacts....................................................................................... 43
5.12 Socioeconomic Impacts ..................................................................................................... 44
5.13 Public and Occupational Health Impacts ........................................................................... 44
5.14 Waste Management Impacts ............................................................................................ 45
5.15 Unavoidable Adverse Environmental Impacts .................................................................. 46
5.16 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitments of Resources ............................................... 46
6.0 MITIGATION MEASURES ................................................................................................................. 47
7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENTS AND MONITORING PROGRAMS........................................... 48
7.1.1 Operational Airborne Monitoring ........................................................................ 48
7.1.2 Other Environmental Monitoring ......................................................................... 48
7.2 Ecological Monitoring ........................................................................................................ 49
7.3 Surface Water Monitoring ................................................................................................. 49
7.4 Groundwater Monitoring .................................................................................................. 50
8.0 SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ....................................................................... 52
9.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................... 53
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

iii Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
April 2024 Environmental Report

TABLES

Table 1-1 Reagents used in the Milling Process
Table 1-2 Plant Stack Emissions
Table 3-1 Land Cover within 50 Square Miles of the Facility
Table 3-2 Population in the State of Utah and in Counties Near the Facility
Table 3-3 Demographics
Table 3-4 Daily Vehicle Traffic Data
Table 3-5 Soil Series within 50 Square Miles of the Facility
Table 3-6 Entrada Sandstone Horizontal Groundwater Flow Gradients
Table 3-7 Calculated Vertical Gradient Between Wells RM8 and RM20
Table 3-8 Entrada, Carmel, and Navajo Unit Groundwater Elevation Comparison
Table 3-9 Aquifer Test Results
Table 3-10 Total Monthly Precipitation Recorded for the Facility and at Selected Regional Stations,
1980 and 2023
Table 3-11 Species Observed During the June 2008 Survey
Table 4-1 Radiological Dose to Specific Receptors – Environmental MILDOS Model
Table 5-1 Alternative Impacts
Table 5-2 Projected Daily Vehicle Traffic
Table 7-1 Environmental Monitoring Excluding Groundwater
Table 7-2 Compliance Monitoring Wells
Table 8-1 Summary of Environmental Consequences

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

iv Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
April 2024 Environmental Report

FIGURES

Figure 1-1 Location of Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Figure 1-2 Land Ownership
Figure 1-3 Facility Features
Figure 1-5 Proposed Action Facility Process Flow Diagram
Figure 1-6 Proposed Action Tailings Storage Facility Cross Section
Figure 2-1 Alternative 3 Tailings Storage Facility Reclamation
Figure 2-2 Alternative 3 Facility Features
Figure 2-3 Alternative 3 Tailings Storage Facility Cover Cross Section
Figure 3-1 Bureau of Land Management Grazing Allotments
Figure 3-2 Bureau of Land Management Natural Area
Figure 3-3 Land Cover
Figure 3-4 Populated Area
Figure 3-5 Nearest Residence
Figure 3-6 2020 Census Population
Figure 3-7 Transportation Corridors
Figure 3-8 Facility Roads
Figure 3-9 Traffic Count Stations
Figure 3-10 Henry Mountains Basin Cross Section
Figure 3-11 Regional Geologic Map
Figure 3-12 Facility Geologic Column
Figure 3-13 Facility Geologic Map
Figure 3-14 Joint Orientations
Facility 3-15 Mapped Fractures and Joint Sets
Figure 3-16 Location of Wells and Geologic Cross Sections
Figure 3-17 Geologic Cross Section 1-1’
Figure 3-18 Geologic Cross Section 2-2’
Figure 3-19 Geologic Cross Section 3-3’
Figure 3-20 Soil Series
Figure 3-21 Groundwater Elevation in the Perched Zone and the Entrada Aquifer, November 2023
Figure 3-22 Time Series of Measured Groundwater Elevations
Figure 3-23 Water Levels and Calculated Vertical Gradient between RM8 and RM20
Figure 3-24 Formations and Deep Wells
Figure 3-25 Hansen Creek Watershed
Figure 3-26 Seeps or Springs Identified in 1984
Figure 3-27 Groundwater Wells within 50 square miles
Figure 3-28 Proposed Environmental Air Monitoring Locations
Figure 3-29 Cultural Survey Areas
Figure 3-30 View of Facility from Highway 276
Figure 3-31 View of Facility from Nearest Resident
Figure 3-32 National Units within 50-mile radius of the Facility
Figure 7-1 Proposed Environmental Monitoring Locations
Figure 7-2 Operation Groundwater Monitoring Locations
Figure 7-3 Groundwater Monitoring Locations Post-Operations

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

v Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
April 2024 Environmental Report

APPENDIX

Appendix A Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Facility

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

1 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Anfield Resources Holding Corp. (Anfield) is submitting this environmental report to the State of Utah
Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control (DWMRC)
to support the renewal of UT 0900480 (License) for the Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
(Facility) from Standby to Operational status.

Several environmental reports have been prepared over the years to support activities at the Facility
(Woodward-Clyde, 1978a and 1978b; NRC, 1979; Plateau, 1997; ERG, et.al., 2017). This environmental
report uses some of the information included in prior reports.

1.1 Purpose of Report
This Environmental Report was prepared to assess the potential impacts associated with the Proposed
Action of upgrading the Facility for a maximum production capacity of 1,000 tons of ore per day to
produce uranium and vanadium, the No Action Alternative of continuing the Facility in Standby status,
and Alternative 3, which is reclamation and decommissioning of the existing Facility.

1.2 Site Description
The Facility is located in Garfield County in Southeastern Utah, approximately miles north of Ticaboo,
Utah at latitude 37° 42' 30" North and longitude 110°41' 30" West (Figure 1-1). The Facility is located in
Sections 3 and 4 of Township 36 South Range 11 East and Section 33 and 34 of Township 35 South
Range 11 East. The Facility is bounded in all directions by Bureau of Land Management land (Figure 1-2).
The Anfield property consists of approximately 265 acres.

Existing features at the Facility include (Figure 1-3) the mill building and associated support buildings,
ore stockpiles, and the existing tailings storage facility. The tailings from the 1982 operations were
discharged upstream of the cross valley berm. This figure also shows the east dike and north dike which
bound the 11e.(2) Byproduct Material.

The mill building contains the ore grinding and extraction circuits and the yellowcake drying and
packaging area. The existing Facility also includes laboratory and shop buildings, generator building,
exterior reagent storage tanks, fuel storage tanks, ore stockpiles, and outside materials storage areas.
Counter-current decantation (CCD) tanks and reagent tanks were located on an exterior concrete pad
but have been removed from the Facility. During the 1982, Facility operations, ore was stockpiled at the
prepared ore pad just north of the mill building after being weighed on the receiving scale. Ore was
sampled prior to entering the mill building. As mentioned above, the tailings were discharged as a slurry
to the north cell of the tailings storage facility west of the mill building.

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

2 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
1.3 Site History
The Facility was designed, constructed, and licensed between 1978 and 1981 by Plateau Resources Ltd.
(Plateau Resources). The Facility was originally designed and licensed to process 750 per day (tons/day)
of ore. The Facility operated for 76 days from April through August of 1982, processing approximately
25,000 cubic yards of ore. The ore was processed in an acid leach circuit at an average daily rate of 500
tons per day at an average ore grade of 0.15 percent U3O8 which is also known as yellowcake. Tailings
were discharged into the engineered tailings storage facility (TSF) west of the mill building, which
consists of an earthen and clay dam constructed across a natural topographic depression. The existing
tailings are located above a cross valley berm on a clay liner and underdrain system directly above the
natural sandstone in the tailings storage facility area.
Plateau Resources suspended operations at the Facility on August 18, 1982 and the Facility was then
placed in a standby mode. Cleanup operations were completed to purge the system of process
materials and reagents, and solids were removed from all circuits except the calciner and product
thickener. The doors to the calciner room were welded shut and doors to the concentrate product area
(600 area) were locked. Plans for decommissioning were prepared and approved by the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC). Some of the mill process components were sold in anticipation of
decommissioning.
Plateau Resources submitted a license renewal request to the Utah Department of Environmental
Quality (UDEQ), Division of Radiation Control (DRC) for license UT0900480 for standby status on March
1, 1996 (Plateau, 1996) and a subsequent amendment to the request on December 20, 2006 (Plateau,
2006) to return the Facility to operational status, although approval of the request was not completed.
Uranium One purchased the Facility on April 1, 2007 from Plateau Resources. Uranium One continued
the licensing action to return to operational status started by Plateau Resources but paused that process
when uranium prices did not justify Facility restart. Anfield purchased the Facility from Uranium One in
January 2016 and has been working toward the Facility restart since that time.

1.4 Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action
Uranium is the majority of the fuel for nuclear reactors that generate power. In the United States, 93
nuclear reactors located in 53 plants in 28 states provide approximately 18 percent of the electrical
demand (NEI, 2024). Small nuclear reactors that produce isotopes for medical, industrial, and research
purposes also use uranium. One conventional uranium mill, White Mesa, is operating in the United
States. In 2023, no mill in the United States produced uranium (EIA, 2024). Approximately 13,000
pounds of uranium as yellowcake was produced from five in-situ recovery operations in the United
States (EIA, 2024). Each nuclear reactor uses approximately 150 of fuel pounds per day. The 2023
domestic production of uranium in the United States would power one nuclear reactor in one plant for
less than three months. Kazakhstan produces more than 40 percent of the world supply of uranium.
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

3 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
Vanadium is used as an alloy in steel to increase strength and is used in surgical instruments, stainless
steel and titanium alloys among others. The Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility is necessary to
meet help meet the demand of domestic production of uranium and vanadium in the United States.
Anfield intends to operate the Facility to produce uranium and vanadium from regional ores at a
maximum rate of 1,000 tons per day. The Facility was originally designed to process up to 750 tons per
day of ore and not was designed to process vanadium. Further, portions of the mill equipment have
either been removed or need to be fully replaced and a new tailings storage facility is needed .
Therefore, portions of the Facility need to be upgraded to best available technology to ensure
appropriate operational performance and process material containment and the process needs to be
modified to process vanadium and uranium ore. The Proposed Action is to license the facility to operate
and produce uranium and vanadium from up to 1,000 tons per day of ore and, after operations are
complete, decommission the Facility and reclaim all appropriate wastes and tailings in place .

1.5 The Proposed Action
Anfield herein proposes to expand the Facility capacity to 1,000 tons per day and to add a vanadium
recovery circuit using solvent extraction. As with the previous Facility design, the mill design for this
application assumes 91 percent recovery and 350 days per year operation. Ore uranium grades are
expected to vary and average around 0.25 percent but could reach values of up to 0.46 percent
uranium. Based on a maximum process rate of 1,000 tons per day, a recovery rate of 91 percent and
350 days per year, the mill has the upper-end capacity to produce approximately 3,000,000 pounds of
uranium oxide (U3O8), also known as yellowcake, per year. The vanadium extraction circuit is designed
to produce ammonium metavanadate and 99.5 or 99.9 percent vanadium oxide (V 2O5). Vanadium ore
grades are expected to average approximately 1.25 percent vanadium pentoxide (V2O5) and mill
recovery of vanadium is expected to be approximately 80 percent, resulting in an annual V2O5
production rate of 7,000,000 lbs.

The ore is principally sandstone obtained from various regional mines. The ore is ground to sand sized
particles and the uranium leached from the particles using a conventional acid leach process. Uranium
is recovered with the decanted liquid in countercurrent decantation (countercurrent decantation) tanks.
Solids are discharged from the countercurrent decantation system as waste material to the tailings
storage facility located in a natural basin enclosed by a dam. The decanted, acidic liquid is pumped to
leaching tanks, processed and passed to a solvent extraction (SX) system. Ammonia is added to the
solution to precipitate the uranium as yellowcake. The yellowcake is then dried, packaged, and shipped
offsite to a uranium hexafluoride conversion plant for the next phase of the fuel manufacturing process.
The depleted aqueous solution from uranium solvent extraction serves as the feed for vanadium
processing.

Processed ore, or tailings, is the major waste generated. Permanent disposal of the tailings is achieved
by storing the material in an engineered, lined tailings storage facility (Figure 1-4). The tailings liquid is
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

4 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
separated using an underdrain system following placement. The process water is recycled back to the
mill circuit, used for dust control in the tailings storage facility, or returned to the tailings storage facility
and evaporated. The plant and its support buildings also produce lesser quantities of other liquid and
solid wastes and effluents which are recycled in the various process operations, discharged with the
tailings and liquids, or discharged to a septic system and sanitary waste leach field. Gaseous and
particulate emissions from the Facility are discharged from eight stacks. Three of the stacks are exhaust
stacks from diesel powered generators used to produce electricity (Figure 1-4).

1.5.1 Mill Process and Equipment
Ore is hauled by truck to the mill from various regional mines. All mill process units except the
countercurrent decantation tanks and the clarifier are housed or covered. The plant support buildings
and facilities, such as an office, maintenance and warehouse building, laboratory, powerhouse, and
storage tanks, are located around the perimeter of the process units to yield a compact, well -integrated
complex.

The ore is moved from the stockpiles to the grizzly and ore hopper by frontend wheeled loader. The ore
is transported from the hopper to the semi-autogenous grinding (SAG) mill by covered conveyor. The
ore is first ground to sand-size particles. This allows the acid to contact the grain surfaces during the
leaching process. After grinding, the ore is delivered in slurry form directly to a two -stage, multiple-tank
acid leaching system.

A series of operations is required to extract uranium from the ore. The ore is principally sandstone. The
uranium minerals are present in the ore as coatings on sand grains; they also fill intergranular spaces.
The uranium minerals are soluble in strong sulfuric acid solutions and will leach from the ore by a
conventional acid leach process. Figure 1-5 presents a simplified process flow diagram for the plant,
illustrating the pathway of ore to tailings and other wastes, as well as uranium and vanadium products.
Table 1-1 lists reagents used in the process.

After leaching, the slurry is pumped to countercurrent decantation tanks where most of the soluble
uranium is recovered with the decanted liquid. The countercurrent decantation tanks are operated in
series; solids pass through the tanks in one direction and the acid wash solution in the opposite
direction. The solids are discharged from the countercurrent decantation system as waste material to
the tailings storage facility. The decanted, acidic liquid is pumped to the first-stage leaching tanks.

A thickener between the two leaching stages separates the uranium -bearing solution from the solids.
The overflow liquid from the thickener passes through a clarifier and sand filters that remove suspended
solids.

The separated solids from these two processes return to the leaching system. The filtered liquid is
transferred to a solvent extraction (SX) liquid ion exchange system.

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

5 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
The uranium-bearing liquor passes through a series of stages in the solvent extraction system in which
the uranium is transferred from the aqueous phase to an organic phase and then is stripped from the
solvent by an ammonium sulfate solution. The ammonia is added to the stripped solution to precipitate
the uranium as yellowcake. Finally, the yellowcake is dried, packaged, and shipped off site to a uranium
hexafluoride conversion plant.

1.5.2 Sources of Plant Wastes, Control Equipment , and Instrumentation
The predominant waste stream is processed ore, or tailings. Tailings consist of milled and stripped solids
and low pH process solutions, which are permanently stabilized by storage in an engineered, lined
tailings storage facility. A zoned earth embankment dam was constructed across the valley in the early
1980s as part of the initial tailings storage facility. This dam, referred to as the Shootaring Dam or south
dam, has a height of approximately 120 feet. For the Proposed Action, a new South Cell will be
constructed directly on and upslope from the south dam (Figure 1-4) with a multilayered liner system
that has a leachate collection system and leak detection system with a compacted clay basal liner. The
liner system includes a leachate collection system above the upper high-density polyethylene
geomembrane (primary Liner) and a leak detection system between the primary liner and a high-density
polyethylene geomembrane secondary liner which in turn is underlain by a compacted clay liner (Figure
1-6). Two process ponds with the same liner system as the tailings storage facility will be constructed to
manage liquid tailings and other solutions for reprocessing in the mill (Figure 1-4).

The cross valley berm, which currently contains the existing tailings (Figure 1-3), will be removed along
with the existing tailings in the current tailings storage facility, and will be placed in the South Cell after
it is fully constructed.

The mill and its support facilities also produce lesser quantities of other liquid and solid wastes and
effluents that are either recycled in process operations; or discharged to the tailings storage facility.
Sanitary wastes will be disposed in a permitted sanitary waste leach field.

Nine stacks release gaseous wastes and dust. Estimated emissions and physical characteristics of the mill
stacks that could or do release radionuclides from the milling process are listed in Table 1-2.

Dust and mist control equipment at the processing facility will include both wet dust collectors and mist
vapor and fume collectors.

Volatile fuels and reagents are stored in closed tanks to minimize the escape of vapors to the
atmosphere. Many unit operations are carried out within buildings or closed vessels. The air and gases
from the process vessels are passed through wet dust collectors or demisters to remove dust, mists, and
gaseous pollutants. Gaseous effluents and dust are discharged from stacks to promote atmospheric
dilution and dispersion.

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

6 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
Buildings housing various plant operations have concrete floors. These floors slope to concrete lined
sumps that collect any spillage. Spilled materials are pumped back into the appropriate plant circuit.
The floors of the buildings are curbed or recessed to contain the volume of at least the largest process
tank. Fuel oil, kerosene, and acid storage tanks are located in open areas, and are placed within
impoundments capable of holding the volume of the enclosed tanks.

Sewage disposal is conducted in accordance with the requirements of and approved permit with the
Bureau of Water Pollution Control of the Utah State Division of Health. The permit was approved in
1979.

The plant has an analytical and metallurgical laboratory that routinely analyzes and tests the ore and
process streams to optimize the extraction of uranium from ores with differing properties. The
laboratory routinely analyzes the various process reagents and the finished product as quality control
measures. The fume hoods of the laboratory collect air, chemical fumes, and mists and discharge them
through a scrubber and stack to the atmosphere. The gaseous effluent does not contain sufficient
quantities of potential radionuclides or chemicals to constitute a significant impact. Liquid effluent is
collected in a laboratory dedicated sump which is periodically pumped to the tailings storage facility.
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

7 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024

2.0 ALTERNATIVES
2.1 Detailed Description of Alternatives
2.1.1 No Action Alternative
The No Action Alternative, Alternative 1, assumes that the Facility remains in Standby status. No milling
would occur and the Facility would not be reclaimed. This is problematic because previous owners of
the Facility initiated a license amendment to return to full operational status and a renewal of the
License is required. A License renewal application would need to be submitted with the request to
remain in Standby status.

2.1.2 Proposed Action
The Proposed Action, Alternative 2, is to return the Facility to operational status, update the Facility to
best available technology, to increase the capacity up to 1,000 tons of ore per day processed for the
removal of uranium and vanadium as discussed in the License Renewal Application (ARHC, 2024b). A
South Cell for the tailings storage facility will be constructed (Figure 1-4). An estimated 99,700 cubic
yards of existing tailings, 11e.(2) Byproduct Material, and locally contaminated materials that exist
within the proposed tailings storage facility boundary will be placed in the new South Cell after it is
lined. Tailings from the processing of ore for uranium and vanadium will be placed in the South Cell
after construction of the cell is completed. After production ends, the Facility would be reclaimed in
accordance with the approved Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan as included in Exhibit B.3 in the
License Renewal Application.

2.1.2.1 Summary of Major Impacts of the Proposed Action
The major impacts of the proposed action include potential adverse impacts to wildlife from access to
stored tailings liquids and other liquid wastes, geologic impacts from construction and land disturbance
from Facility operations, as well as potential impacts to air quality from air emissions. The proposed
South Cell of the tailings storage facility and process ponds would have fluid impounded that could
potentially attract wildlife. If wildlife were to solely use these features, impacts could occur. The NRC
assessed impacts to terrestrial and aquatic biota (NRC, 1979) and determined that significant impacts to
wildlife were not expected but the actual extent of those impacts could not be quantified. Best
management practices and potential mitigation measures include placement of reflective ribbon on T -
posts and placement of predatory decoy birds (e.g., falcons and owls) around the pond perimeters to
create visual deterrents for bird use of the ponds.

Excavation of soil impacted by a 1982 tailings spill and grading of the area for South Cell construction
and excavation and construction of the process ponds in portions of areas that have not previously been
disturbed. The removal of the impacted soil and grading for construction of the South Cell will cause
irretrievable loss of the soil and bedrock, if any, in this area. As discussed in Section 3.7, the Badland -
Rock outcrop complex has limited use for wildlife and is not suitable for grazing. Additionally, borrow
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

8 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
sources would be disturbed as discussed in Exhibit B.3 of the License Renewal Application to provide
material to complete the reclamation of the Facility. Soil and rock would be lost in those areas as well.
The impacts to the borrow areas would potentially be short term as these areas will be reseeded with an
approved see mix.

The Proposed Action could potentially cause impacts to the local ambient air quality from fugitive dust
and vehicle exhaust as a result of excavation, grading, hauling, truck and personnel vehicle travel to and
from the Facility, the use of diesel generators, and radon from the tailings storage facility. The nearest
resident is more than one mile from the Facility and any potential impacts to air quality would be local.
Air quality impacts during operational phases of the mill are expected to be below Federal and State
standards. Anfield will control fugitive dust and radon releases from the tailings impoundment through
spraying and interim soil covers. Spraying will be used to control dust emissions from ore stockpiles
which are not immediately processed.

2.1.3 Reasonable Alternatives
A reasonable alternative to the No Action Alternative and the Proposed Action would be to
decommission and reclaim the Facility, Alternative 3. Reclamation of the Facility would involve
reclamation and decommissioning of the existing Facility buildings, excavation of impacted soil around
the buildings, excavation of soil impacted by 1982 tailings spill south of the cross valley berm, and
excavation of tailings impacted soil north of the north dike (Figure 1-3). All soil, buildings, and
equipment impacted by 11e.(2) Byproduct Material that do not meet radiological release criteria for
unrestricted use, would be placed in the existing tailings storage facility (Figure 2-1). The existing
tailings storage facility would be capped and graded in accordance with the approved Reclamation Plan
(Hydro-Engineering, 2005; Figures 2-2 and 2-3). Reclamation of the facility would be completed in
approximately 24 months.
2.1.4 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated
No other alternatives were considered but eliminated. Moving the Facility to a different location was
not considered as that alternative would require reclamation of the tailings storage facility and mill
buildings at the current site and disturbing a new site for the new mill buildings and tailings storage
facility.

2.2 Cumulative Effects
The traffic between Interstate 70 and the Bullfrog Marina, south of the Facility, along Highway 95 peaks
during summer months as recreators travel to Lake Powell. As discussed in Section 5, approximately 8
trucks per day will travel between Interstate 70 and the Facility along Highway 95. Additionally,
approximately 40 trucks transporting ore will travel between the junction of Highway 95 and Highway
191 to the Facility. This Facility related traffic will increase the traffic on the short section of Highway
191 between the junction with Highway 95 and the Facility by approximately 16 percent. Facility related
traffic between Interstate 70 and the Facility would increase the traffic by less than 10 percent.

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

9 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
The Tony M Mine is located approximately four miles west of the Facility. Garfield County Road 13383
would be the access road to reach the Tony M Mine from Highway 276. In March 2024, IsoEnergy, Ltd.
(IsoEnergy) announced that it would reopen the Tony M Mine and restart uranium mining operations in
2025. IsoEnergy stated that it has a toll milling access agreement with the White Mesa Mill in Blanding,
Utah. Tony M Mine traffic would increase traffic along Garfield County Road 13383, Highway 95 to the
junction with Highway 191, and along Highway 191 to deliver ore to the White Mesa Milll. This is the
same route that ore trucks would travel from Anfield mines to the east. The amount of traffic
associated with the Tony M Mine is not quantifiable at this time.

White Mesa Mill in Blanding, Utah has announced it is restarting its uranium circuit. This restarting of
the mill circuit may increase traffic along Highway 191 which Facility ore trucks will travel to the junction
with Highway 95. The amount of that traffic increase is not known.
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

10 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
3.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT
3.1 Topography
The Facility is situated on a low mesa and a small, isolated catchment to the west contains the tailings
storage facility. A tall butte separates the Facility from Shitamaring Canyon. Drainage from the Facility is
to the southwest into Shitamaring Creek. The tributary in which the tailings storage facility is located has
been called Shootaring Canyon. Elevation ranges from 4,350 to 4,850 feet above mean sea level with
local relief ranging from 200 to 500 feet. Geologic structure is relatively simple in the immediate area,
with the various sedimentary formations dipping gently (2 to 3 degrees) to the west.

3.2 Land Use/Land Cover
Approximately 89 percent of Garfield County land is owned by the U.S. Government . This land includes
national parks, national forests, recreation areas, national monuments and resource land. The U.S.
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has jurisdiction over surface and mineral rights on approximately 57
percent of the total area of Garfield County. These lands are used for livestock grazing, recreation,
mineral development, and natural resource management.

Land owned by the Federal Government comprises 89 percent of the land ownership within 50 square
miles of the Facility (Figure 1-2). Ten percent of the land within 50 square miles is owned by the State
and 0.4 percent of the land withing 50 square miles is privately owned. Two Bureau of Land
Management Grazing Allotments comprise 100 percent of the area with 50 square miles of the Facility
(Figure 3-1). No grazing is allowed on the private land owned by Anfield. One BLM Natural Area is
partially within 50 square miles of the Facility (Figure 3-2).

Colorado Plateau Blackbrush-Mormon-tea Shrubland comprises approximately 47 percent of the land
cover with 50 square miles of the Facility with Colorado Plateau Mixed Bedrock Canyon and Tableland
comprising approximately 35 percent (Figure 3-3 and Table 3-1).

3.3 Demography
The population of Utah in 2020 was 3,271,616 (Census, 2020). This population represents an overall
density of 39.7 persons per square mile. Utah is sparsely populated. More than 75 percent of Utah's
population lives in four counties: Salt Lake, Utah, Davis, and Weber, which contain the cities Salt Lake
City, Provo, Bountiful, and Ogden, respectively. Of the 29 counties in Utah, Garfield ranks 25th in
population.

Garfield County is the fifth largest county in Utah, covering 5,175 square mile (13,401 square kilometer).
However, the population density is 1 person per square mile (0.6 persons per square kilometer). Ninety
percent of the residents live in the western portion of the county near the north -south transportation
corridor through Utah (Interstate 15 and U.S. Highway 89). There are also some ranches and farms
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

11 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
scattered across Garfield County. The bordering counties of Wayne, San Juan, and Kane are also sparsely
populated (Table 3-2).

The area near the Facility is sparsely populated. Residents living near the Facility are located in Ticaboo,
the North Lake Powell Marine, Bullfrog Marina, Halls Crossing Marina, and Hanksville (Figure 3-4).

Ticaboo and the North Lake Powell Marine lie about 2.5 and 3 miles (4 and 4.8 km) south of the Facility,
respectively. Bullfrog Marina is located on Lake Powell, about 14 miles (22 km) south of the Facility.
Halls Crossing Marina lies approximately 3.5 miles (5 km) further south of Bullfrog Marina, on the
opposite shore of Lake Powell. Hanskville is located about 46 air miles (74 air km) north of the Facility,
in Wayne County. Green River and Moab, Utah are larger communities located approximately 93 and 86
air miles (150 and 138 air km) or 110 and 160 road miles away, respectively.

The population of Ticaboo is approximately 100 people. The community is constructed to accommodate
98 single-family homes, 144 mobile homes, and 41 recreational vehicles or camp trailers, although much
of that housing capacity has not been built or is not used annually . The facilities available at Ticaboo
consist of a 72-unit motel; restaurant and bar, convenience store (all open seasonally), and mobile-
home park.

The North Lake Powell Marine consists of approximately 24 employees and family members. The
Shipyard is a privately owned and operated boat storage and gas station facility. Five people live and
work at the Shipyard. Bullfrog Basin Marina consists of approximately 210 employees and family
members. The marina is a recreational community, part of the Glen Canyon National Recreation Area.
Transient residence at Bullfrog Basin Marina is limited by National Park Service regulations to two
months at a time. Peak use of the Marina may approach 43,000 persons per month during summer.
Halls Crossing Marina houses 94 permanent employees and family members. Hanksville has a current
population of 149.

The nearest resident to the Facility is approximately 1.4 miles to the east of the Facility (Figure 3-5). The
residence does not have a well associated with the property.

Few other permanent settlements exist in the general area surrounding the Facility. The 2020 Census
identified the permanent population within 50 square miles of the Facility to be less than 30 residents
and distributed in the Census Blocks shown in Figure 3-6.

The 2020 Census identified that between 47 and 54 percent of the population of Utah, Garfield County,
Wayne County, Kane County, and San Juan County are between 18- and 64-years old (Table 3-3). Only
the population of San Juan County, of the counties identified above, is less than 90 percent white. The
population of San Juan County is approximately 49 percent white. American Indian and Alaska Native
people comprise approximately 47 percent of the population of San Juan County. Part of San Juan
County contains the Navajo Nation.
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

12 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024

Approximately 23 percent of the population of San Juan County lives in poverty compared to less than
12 percent of the population of Utah, Garfield County, Wayne County, and Kane County. San Juan
County also has the smallest percentage (54 percent) of its population in the civilian labor force. Less
than ten percent of the population of Garfield County live in poverty. The unemployment rate in
Garfield County is 6.7 percent which is the highest of all counties in Utah (UDWS, 2024)

3.4 Transportation
Anfield anticipates that the main transportation corridors for the Facility will include Interstate 70; U.S.
Highway 89, U.S. Highway 163, U.S. Highway 191 and U.S. Highway 491; Utah Highways 12, Highways
24, Highways 95, and Highways 276; and Garfield County Roads 13383 and 13380 (Figure 3-7).

Transportation routes within 50 square miles of the Facility include Utah Highway 276 and local roads.
Major corridors near the Facility include Utah Highway 276 and 95 (approximately 2 miles east and 22
miles north and east of the Facility), Utah Highway 12 (approximately 40 miles west of the Facility), Utah
Highway 261 (approximately 46 miles southeast of the Facility) and Utah Highway 24 (approximately 46
miles north of the Facility). No highways, major roads, or railroads cross the Facility (Figure 3-8).

The rural road that leads to the project area is Garfield County Road 13383, which is north of the Facility
and connects the Facility to Utah Highway 276. The Garfield County Road 13383 is an east-west–
oriented, three-mile county road and it is the only access route to the Facility from the major corridors.
According to a telephone interview on July 26, 2016, with Mr. Brian B. Bremner, Garfield County
Engineer, this road is an unpaved, two-lane road consisting of crushed gravel surfacing. Garfield County
Road 13383 ranges in width from to 24–26 feet between Utah Highway 276 and the Facility. Between
the Facility and the Tony M Mine, which is owned by IsoEnergy. and lies approximately four miles
northwest, County Roads 13380 and 13300 become thinner and are comprised of native sandy gravel.
Mr. Bremner stated that the Title 5 Right of Way of Garfield County Road 13383 was granted to the
Garfield County by the BLM. Both Garfield County and Anfield share maintenance responsibility of
Garfield County Road 13383 between the Facility and Utah Highway 276, including blading and grading
operations and miscellaneous repairs of this road. Garfield County grades the road once or twice a year.
Mr. Bremner states that the road is not plowed and not routinely closed because of snow accumulation.
Anfield will work with Garfield County to ensure year-round access to and egress from the Facility.

All primary roads are well-maintained throughout the year and are typical asphalt and concrete-paved
roadways. Additional secondary roads and area routes include those accessed by 4WD vehicles for
recreation and hunting.

3.4.1.1 Traffic
Traffic counts for the main corridors that would be traveled by vehicles to the Facility from the Anfield
mines, workers from their homes, or supply deliveries to the Facility and from the facility to deliver
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

13 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
yellowcake were developed by the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) and Colorado
Department of Transportation (UDOT, 2024; CDOT, 2024). The traffic count points identified in Figure 3-
9 are listed in Table 3-4. Annual average daily traffic (AADT) estimates are derived from three primary
sources of data: permanent traffic recorders, portable traffic recorders, and manual traffic classification
counts. Daily traffic averages were calculated over a 24-hour period, 7 days a week, and were derived
from permanent and short-term traffic counts.

Due to the remote location of the Facility and the lack of residences and businesses along Garfield
County Road 13383, no traffic data are available. Additionally, Garfield County had no historic traffic
studies available for this road. Anfield contacted the Garfield County Transportation Department, who
stated they did not have traffic counts for Garfield County Road 13383 but estimate that the normal
load on the road is two to three cars or all-terrain vehicles per day. Based on site experience gathered
from maintaining the Facility during the past several years, traffic volumes on the access road are very
low (fewer than five vehicles per day) and primarily related to recreational use. There is no residential
property on the Garfield County Road 13383 between Highway 276 and the Facility. A minimum of
variation in seasonal traffic is expected on the Garfield County Road 13383 with road usage anticipated
to peak in summer and fall due to hunting and recreational activities.

There are no nearby railroads or navigable rivers that will be used for transportation to and from the
Facility.

3.4.1.2 Site Transportation Corridors
The existing Facility transportation corridors are shown on Figure 3-8. The Facility is accessed from
Garfield County Road 13383.

Facility roads are constructed from site-produced sandy gravel passing a 0.375-in screen, and minimize
tire wear, are easy to maintain, reduce fugitive dust emission, and do not get slick when wet.

3.5 Geologic Setting
The Facility is located within the Henry Mountains Basin of southeastern Utah and on a portion of the
Colorado Plateau. The Colorado Plateau covers approximately 150,00 square miles in southeastern
Utah, northern Arizona, northwestern New Mexico, and southwestern Colorado. The area containing
the Facility is drained by tributaries to the Colorado River. These tributaries are deeply incised in the
surface of the Colorado Plateau. Erosional processes stripped the geologic formations overlying the
Jurassic age bedrock. The region has been upwarped with folds. Sedimentary formations of the
Colorado Plateau have been upwarped into domes by intrusions. This Henry Mountains Basin is
bounded on the east by the Monument Uplift, and on the west by the north -south-trending
Waterpocket Fold (Figure 3-10). Elevations within the Henry Mountains Basin range from 4,000 to 7,000
feet. Blanchard (1986) indicates that the stratigraphic section dips slightly (less than 5 degrees) to the
west in the Henry Mountains Area but away from the actual Henry Mountain intrusives.

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

14 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
The only major faults in the basin are located near Mount Holmes, Mount Ellsworth and the San Rafael
Swell. The closest of these faults are approximately two miles from the Facility (Figure 3-11). These
faults trend west-northwest to east-southeast, and displacements along them range from several feet to
several hundred feet (NRC, 1997).

3.6 Geology
The geologic conditions for the Facility were summarized previous reports (Tetra Tech, 2008b;
Woodward Clyde Consultants, 1978, 1984; Hydro-Engineering, 1998, 1999, 2005b; Blanchard 1986; NRC,
1997, 2003.). Portions of the text in this section are directly from those reports.

3.6.1 Regional Geology

The geologic formations with the greatest spatial extent surrounding the Facility are the sedimentary
rocks of the Morrison Formation and the San Rafael Group. The Entrada Sandstone member of the San
Rafael Group forms the abutments surrounding and underlying the tailings storage facility at the Facility
(Figure 3-12).

The major geologic units in the region include the Navajo Sandstone member of the Glen Canyon Group,
the overlying Carmel Formation and the Entrada Sandstone member of the San Rafael Group. Blanchard
(1986) indicates that the stratigraphic section dips slightly (less than 5 degrees) to the west in the Henry
Mountains Area but away from the actual Henry Mountain intrusives.

Woodward Clyde (1978) developed the initial site-specific geologic characterization for the original
property owner in support of mill design and licensing. Additional geologic information has been added
to this original work over many years in the form of lithologic and geophysical logging of wells installed
as part of the groundwater monitoring program.

3.6.2 Local Geology

The geology at the Facility is characterized by relatively flat lying 450 feet thick section of Entrada
Sandstone, which is overlain by a thin veneer of loose alluvium (Figure 3-13). The uppermost aquifer is
hosted by the Entrada Sandstone and is isolated from the underlying Navajo Sandstone aquifer by the
160 to 193 feet thick Carmel Formation, as evidenced by more than 200-foot head difference between
the Navajo and Entrada Sandstones.

3.6.3 Alluvium

The Facility is located on a thin veneer of quaternary alluvium (0 feet thick up to approximately 30 feet
thick) that overlies Entrada Sandstone. These unconsolidated alluvial deposits are primarily derived
from weathering of the exposed sediments of the Curtis Formation, Summerville Formation, Morrison
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

15 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
Formation) and sediments (Cedar Mountain Formation, Dakota Sandstone) with gravel to cobble sized
clasts derived from the igneous rocks exposed in the Henry Mountains to the north.

3.6.4 Entrada Sandstone

The Entrada Sandstone, which is present in outcrop or directly under the thin alluvial cover across the
entire Facility, is reported to vary from 300 feet thick at the southern end of the San Rafael Swell to 700
feet thick near the Henry Mountains (Hunt et al., 1953). Woodward Clyde (1984) reports that the
Entrada Sandstone is more than 400 feet thick at the Facility. Hunt and others also described a change
in facies from the San Rafael Swell to the west where the facies are red bedded silty sandstones to a
more clean (lower fines), massive in character and cliff-forming sandstone near the Henry Mountains
and the Facility. Morton (1984) reports that the Entrada Sandstone is calcite cemented with minor
gypsum not far from the Facility (Dugout Creek), which is consistent with field observations of the
Entrada outcrops at the site. Entrada in outcrop and borehole logs at the Facility is a fairly massive, fine
grained calcite cemented sandstone, though evidence of springs and sporadic perched water levels
suggests that layers of finer grained facies are present locally in the stratigraphic column (Woodward
Clyde, 1984).

The Entrada Sandstone locally exhibits steeply dipping to vertical jointing (greater than 70 degrees).
Joints expressed in outcrop are thin and calcite filled, which weather such that the more resistant
calcite-filled joints protrude from the weathered sandstone. Figure 3-14 presents a map reproduced
from Woodward Clyde (1984) of mapped joint orientations and dips in the drainage hosting the tailings
impoundment. Supplemental joint and fracture mapping performed by GeoTrans in 2008 using aerial
photo interpretation is presented in Figure 3-15. These figures indicate joint patterns with two distinct
general orientations; one set is oriented approximately northwest -southeast to north northeast-south
southwest. Based on hydrologic testing of Facility wells, Hydro-Engineering (1998) conclude that:

“The multi-well pump test … shows that these fractures are not continuous enough to separate
the Entrada aquifer into separate flow units.”

3.6.5 Carmel Formation

The Carmel Formation, which underlies the Entrada Sandstone and separates the Entrada from the
deeper Navajo Sandstone, consists of reddish-brown siltstone, mudstone and sandstone that alternates
with whitish-gray gypsum and fossil-rich limestone in a banded pattern (Mathis, 2000). Drilling at the
Facility identifies the Carmel thickness as between 160 and 193 feet in thickness. Blanchard (1986)
states that the Carmel Formation transmits little water and acts as a confining unit that separates the
ground-water system in the formations of the Glen Canyon Group (Navajo Sandstone) from that in the
Entrada Sandstone. The siltstone at the top of the Carmel Formation is reported by Blanchard to be the
principal bed that limits ground-water movement between the two ground-water systems. Most of the
remainder of the Carmel is reported by Blanchard to be sandy in the Henry Mountains area.

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

16 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
3.6.6 Navajo Sandstone

The Navajo Sandstone, which lies below the Carmel Formation, hosts the major regional aquifer in this
area. The Navajo Sandstone is approximately 800 feet thick at the WW1 site (Hydro-Engineering, 1998).
The Navajo Sandstone, which underlies this entire region, is not of primary significance to the Facility
groundwater hydrology as it is not the uppermost aquifer and is isolated from potential impacts from
the Facility by the Carmel Formation.

Blanchard (1986) reports that the Navajo Sandstone member of the Glen Canyon Group is a gray to
yellowish-gray and reddish-orange, fine- to very fine-grained, thickly crossbedded, aeolian sandstone
that is moderately to well sorted with a few thin lenses of dark-gray magnesium limestone. The Navajo
Sandstone is characterized by large-scale, high-angle crossbedding in sets generally from 20 to 50 feet
thick and erodes to massive cliffs and domes. Thickness of the Navajo Sandstone ranges from slightly
more than 600 feet to more than 1,000 feet along Waterpocket Fold.

3.6.7 Local Geologic Data Interpretation

Neutron logs and gamma logs were used to define the geologic conditions in these wells because they
are useful in delineating the sand/shale contacts in existing wells. Higher hydrogen content should be
present in a well where shale predominates. A shift in the neutron logs occurs at the groundwater
surface due to the increase in hydrogen ions in the water within the well. Smaller American Petroleum
Institute (API) units on the neutron log indicate more hydrogen concentration. Therefore, a shift to the
left, or a decrease in the neutron reading, would indicate a change from a sand toward the unit with
more fines (e.g., a shale or siltstone). The main purpose of the neutron logging in these wells is to
identify lower permeability areas within the Entrada Sandstone which may perch water in the upper
portion of the stratigraphic section above these lower permeability layers. The lower permeability units
on these cross sections are labeled as pink hatched patterned areas. The blue log line represents the
neutron log results on a 0 to 2,700 API units scale while the red line represents the same data on a 0 to
600 API units scale to show better resolution of smaller scale neutron log variations.

Three cross sections are used to depict the geologic conditions in the area beneath the tailings storage
facility. Figure 3-16 presents the location of the wells at the Facility and the location of the three cross
sections. Figure 3-17 (Cross-section 1-1’) starts on the west side of the main tailings embankment at
well RM11/RM16 and extends to the east to well RM13/RM17, located on the east side of the south
dam. Figure 3-18 (Cross-section 2-2’) extends from the west side of the tailings storage facility at RM3,
up along the west side of the drainage to RM14 and then across the mid-valley berm, which contains the
limited existing tailings, across to the east side of the tailings at RM2/RM2R. Figure 3-19 (Cross-section
3-3’) extends from RM15, downstream of the main tailings embankment, to the up gradient monitoring
wells RM1/RM12 through the center of the site, generally parallel to the direction of groundwater flow.

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

17 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
These cross sections indicate that the Entrada Sandstone is fairly massive with discontinuous lenses of
finer grained strata.

Sedimentary rocks exposed at the surface are predominantly sandstones of Upper Jurassic age. The high
buttes and mesas west and north of the Facility are capped by the Salt Wash Member of the Morrison
Formation. This fluvial sandstone unit contains the uranium deposits that are mined in the area.
Exposed cliffs surrounding the buttes and mesas are comprised primarily of the thinly bedded reddish -
brown siltstones and mudstones of the Summerville Formation, underlain by the generally massive fine
grained reddish-brown Entrada Sandstone. The Entrada Sandstone is the bedrock underlying the mill
and the tailings storage facility.

Based on the original geologic mapping completed by Woodward Clyde (1978) and the information
presented in Hydro-Engineering (2005), the Entrada Formation has an approximate thickness of 420
feet. Cementing agents are commonly calcite and ferric iron. The depositional environment is believed
to be primarily eolian. Shale is also present locally and is evidence of episodes of marginal marine
conditions.

No major faulting has been observed in the Entrada Sandstone at the Facility. Limited sets of joints are
widely spaced, steeply dipping and sealed with calcite and gypsum. Joint trends are northwesterly and
northeasterly, coinciding with the regional structural pattern.

Beneath the Entrada lies the Carmel Formation, which is a heterogeneous unit approximately 160 feet
thick composed of sandstone, siltstone, mudstone, limestone, and gypsum. In the Shootaring Canyon
area, the Carmel Formation appears to include substantial layers of shale or mudstone. The Carmel is
underlain by the Navajo Formation which is approximately 800 feet thick in the vicinity of the Facility.
The base of the Navajo is approximately 1,400 feet beneath the surface of the Facility.

Fault development in the area is associated with the intrusive igneous centers of the Henry Mountains.
These faults commonly have a northeasterly or northwesterly strike and do not generally extend far
from the intrusive bodies. Faults are not known to exist within the Facility.

3.7 Soil
Twenty percent of the land within 50 square miles of the Facility is the Badland -Rock outcrop complex
(Table 3-5 and Figure 3-20). This is the largest percentage in that area. The Glenberg family and Moffat
loamy fine sand with 2 to 8 percent slopes are the only other soil series that comprise more than 10
percent of the land within 50 square miles of the Facility.

The majority of the soil within the Facility is comprised of the Moenkopie fine sandy loam (Figure 3-20).
Moenkopie fine sandy loam are shallow, well drained soils from weather of sandstone. The Soil
Conservation service (SCS, 1990) identified that this unit is used as rangeland and wildlife habitat. The
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

18 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
potential plant community is 45 percent grasses, 15 percent forbs, and 40 percent shrubs. Important
plants are galleta, Indian ricegrass, shadscale, Mormon- tea, and blackbrush.

The Badland-Rock outcrop complex and the Rock outcrop-Travessilla complex comprise the rest of the
soil units within the property boundary. Badland-Rock outcrop complex is identified as 70 percent
badland, 15 percent rock outcrop, and 15 percent soil derived from the rock outcrops (SCS, 1990).
Further, SCS identified that this unit contains about 5 percent Chipeta silty clay, 5 percent Moenkopie
fine sandy loam, and 5 percent Neskahi family fine sandy loam in drainageways. This unit is limited for
use by wildlife (SCS, 1990).

Rock outcrop-Travessilla complex is identified as 55 percent rock outcrop, 25 percent Travessilla sandy
loadm and 20 percent other soils (SCS, 1990). Additionally, the Soil Conservation Service identified that
this unit is used mainly for wildlife habitat. It has very limited use as rangeland.
The potential plant community on the Travessilla soil is 30 percent grasses, 15 percent forbs, and 55
percent shrubs. Important plants are needleandthread, Bigelow sagebrush, shadscale, littleleaf
mountainmahogany, and Utah juniper.

None of the soil units are identified as prime farmland.

3.8 Hydrogeology
The Henry Mountains Basin contains three principal aquifers, each in the three major sandstone units of
the region; the Navajo Sandstone, the Windgate Sandstone and the Entrada Sandstone (Blanchard,
1986). In the area, these aquifers are recharged by natural infiltration of precipitation and snow melt
near the flanks of the Henry Mountains as well as vertical infiltration from direct precipitation
(Blanchard, 1986) and infiltration from ephemeral drainage flows. These aquifers are used to support
limited agriculture as well as industrial and domestic water uses. Both water production and water
quality are typically high from these aquifers.

Characterization of local groundwater hydrologic conditions has been achieved through installation,
testing and sampling of groundwater wells and piezometers at the Facility since its construction in the
early 1980’s.

3.8.1 Uppermost Aquifer (Entrada Sandstone)

The Entrada Sandstone at the Facility is generally 425 to 500 feet thick. Groundwater is first
encountered at depths ranging from approximately 150 to 200 feet below ground surface with 250 to
350 feet of saturation above the underlying Carmel Formation. This Entrada Sandstone is the
uppermost aquifer at the Facility. Lower permeability layers within the Entrada Sandstone have been
identified through well boring geophysical logs and pumping tests . These lower permeability layers
impact groundwater occurrence and movement. Specifically, these lower permeability layers appear to
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

19 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
locally cause limited areas of perched water above the regional groundwater potentiometric surface,
and locally confined conditions (Hydro-Engineering, 1998).

The piezometric surface of the Entrada Sandstone and the upper low permeability zone are presented
on cross sections (Figure 3-17 to 3-19). The upper low permeability zone is presented on Cross Section 3-
3’ (Figure 3-19) at wells RM8 and RM9. Cross Section 1-1’ (Figure 3-17) shows the land surface, water-
level elevation for the Entrada Sandstone and the base of the Entrada Sandstone or the top of the
Carmel Formation. Areas within the Entrada Sandstone which contain lower permeability sandstone are
also interpreted from the neutron logs in the RM4 and RM5 area and are shown on the cross section
with a hatch pattern to depict the lower permeability sandstone. These zones would be expected to
create higher heads in the upper portion of the Entrada Sandstone on top of the lower permeability
material. These lower permeability sandstone zones are limited in lateral extent as evidenced by their
absence in geophysical logs on the margins of the site. The southern pinch out of the upper low
permeability zone Entrada Sandstone groundwater saturation is shown near RM11 (Figure 3-19).

Cross-section 2-2’, which is shown as Figure 3-18, runs from monitoring well RM3 through RM7 and to
RM2. The neutron logs of these wells do not show a shallow lower permeability sandstone zone. The
permeability is indicated to be less by a relatively low American Petroleum Institute units signature at
certain intervals but is not interpreted to be sufficiently lower permeability material to cause perched
conditions. The zone between 140 and 150 feet in depth at well RM2 contains a lower permeability
material than the adjacent sandstone to this interval. This zone is not thought to contain as low a
permeability as the lower permeability zone shown on the other cross sections, based on the neutron
logs signature. The Entrada Sandstone groundwater surface for cross-section 2-2’ shows a gradual slope
of the piezometric surface from the east to the west side in this area of the tailings.

Cross Section 2-2’ extends from well RM15, downstream of the tailings storage facility, to RM1 on the
upstream side of the tailings basin. This cross section shows the variable land surface along this section
and shows the inferred contact between the Entrada Sandstone and the Carmel Formation. A low
permeability zone is interpreted in the log for RM15 but does not extend to RM7. The low permeability
zone is drawn below wells RM8 and RM9 because the saturated level in these wells show that an Upper
Low Permeability zone exists in their area. A similar stratigraphic zone is also shown at well RM1.

Figure 3-21 shows the November 2023 Facility groundwater elevation data and interpreted groundwater
table for the Entrada Sandstone. Groundwater elevations in the southern portion and eastern portion
of the Facility are based on 2003-2004 data. Comparison of 2003 groundwater elevations and 2024
groundwater elevations (Figure 3-22) shows that groundwater levels have dropped less than two feet
and the 2003 data are useful in estimating the groundwater surface for locations where no current
monitoring points exist.

Figures 3-17 though 3-19 illustrate the local geologic interpretation, well screen intervals and measured
water levels. The groundwater elevation surface contours in the Entrada Sandstone reflect
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

20 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
interpretations based on current water levels in existing wells and interpretation and extrapolation from
historic water levels from abandoned wells. The groundwater gradient in the uppermost aquifer is to
the south southwest with an average gradient of approximately 0.01 ft/ft.

These data indicate that Entrada Sandstone groundwater flow at the tailings storage facility is generally
from north to south, from the upper reaches of the tailings basin to the south of the main tailings
embankment. In addition, Figure 3-22 indicates that groundwater levels have been relatively stable
over the past few decades. However, no evidence of seasonality was identified in groundwater level
through statistical analysis of the data record for current monitoring wells (WESI, 2013).

Laterally discontinuous lower permeability layers within the Entrada Sandstone at the Facility (Figures 3-
18 and 3-19), have created locally confined conditions as discussed by Hydro-Engineering (1998) and
locally perched groundwater levels above the uppermost aquifer. In a multi-well pumping test of
historical well RM15, Hydro-Engineering reports (1998) that:

The piezometric surface in the middle of the Entrada Sandstone indicates that the Entrada
aquifer would be an unconfined ground-water system but the pump testing does not show any
indication of unconfined aquifer conditions. The complete drawdown curve fits the Theis (1935)
type curve and does not show any signs of the Neuman (1973) unconfined type curves.

Horizontal Groundwater Flow
Woodward Clyde (1984) reports that the original 1978 NRC Environmental Report for the Facility
determined a horizontal groundwater flow velocity of 3.19 ft/year (27.33 ft/day hydraulic conductivity x
0.1168 ft/ft gradient), although this does not account for the influence of effective porosity on
groundwater flow velocity. Hydro-Engineering (1998) estimated the horizontal groundwater flow
velocity as 0.022 ft/day (8 ft/year) using an average horizontal gradient of 0.011 ft/ft (RM1 to RM15), an
average hydraulic conductivity of 0.2 ft/day and an assumed effective porosity value of 0.1.

The calculated range of velocities using the average of the well -specific gradients and well-specific
hydraulic conductivity values spans 5.0 ft/year to 0.5 ft/year with an average value of 3.2 ft/year (WESI,
2013). The lower range of the effective porosity values (0.02) yielded calculated horizontal groundwater
flow velocities of between 52 ft/year and 5 ft/year with an average of 34 ft/year. However, this
extremely low effective porosity value, only 2 percent of a unit volume of sandstone available for
groundwater flow, seems atypically low for the hydraulic conductivity values measured at the site.
Therefore, it is believed that groundwater flow velocities are closer to those estimated using the
average effective porosity value (e.g., on the order of 5 ft/year) would be more representative of
conditions at the Facility.

Calculated horizontal flow gradients for individual existing wells range from 0.015 ft/ft to 0.008 ft/ft with
an average of 0.012 ft/ft, closely matching the overall Facility groundwater horizontal flow gradient of
0.011 ft/ft (Table 3-6; WESI, 2013). The horizontal groundwater flow gradient to the east of the tailings
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

21 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
storage facility (RM2R and OW1A) appears to be slightly steeper (approximately 0.017 ft/ft to 0.019
ft/ft), though there are fewer Entrada Sandstone wells in this eastern area with which to assess
gradients in the Entrada Sandstone.

The November 2023 Entrada aquifer groundwater elevations on Figure 3-21 are presented in blue
contours. The groundwater elevations from the perched water zone are drawn in red on Figure 3-21 to
illustrate the area where the lower permeability zone creates the perched water condition. This perched
water zone is separated from the uppermost aquifer by an unsaturated zone as indicated by the
geophysical log from well RM 20 (Figure 3-19). This interpretation is supported by the lack of observed
change to well RM8 groundwater elevation during the 16-day pumping test of well RM15 (Hydro-
Engineering, 1998).

Vertical Groundwater Flow
The Groundwater Discharge Permit Section 1.E.1.d.i requires that water level measurements for all
nested well pairs will be used to define the vertical gradient. The Groundwater Discharge Permit Section
1.G.1.b.6 requires that the vertical hydraulic gradient will be reported as determined from nested well
pair RM8\RM20.

The vertical separation between the mid-point of these two well screen zones (67 feet to 171 feet) is
104 feet which yields a calculated vertical gradient for November 2023 of 0.75 ft/ft (Figure 3-23 and
Table 3-7). The calculated vertical gradient increased between 2007 and 2015 but has fluctuated around
0.75 ft/ft since 2015. This is a result of minor natural fluctuations in the local saturated conditions.

Groundwater elevations in each of the Entrada wells have been relatively stable over the last ten years
(Figure 3-22). Minor exceptions to this are evident in wells RM2R and RM12, which appear to show the
influence of localized seasonal recharge on water levels in upper Entrada Sandstone between 2003 and
2007.

The groundwater potentiometric head difference between the Entrada Sandstone and the Navajo
Formation can be observed in wells OW1A and OW2 versus wells WW -1, OW1B and OW3. Well OW4 is
completed in the Carmel formation but the screen and filter pack appear to extend into the Entrada
Sandstone (WESI, 2013), making the groundwater level readings not indicative of solely the Carmel
Formation. However, historical measurements consistently indicted essentially no vertical gradient
between the Carmel Formation aquitard and Entrada Sandstone. The groundwater potentiometric head
in the Navajo Formation (OW1B and OW3), which is below the Carmel Formation, historically has been
approximately 220 feet lower than the groundwater potentiometric head in the Entrada Sandstone
which indicates that the overall gradient is from the Entrada Sandstone to the Navajo Formation and
there is little or no local hydraulic communication between the aquifers.

Vertical groundwater flow gradients between the uppermost aquifer (Entrada Sandstone) and the
underlying formations can be discerned from water level data in wells WW-1, OW1A, OW1B, OW2, OW3
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

22 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
and OW4. Historical water levels for these wells (Figure 3-24) indicate that the Carmel Formation acts as
an aquitard to vertical groundwater flow between the major formations. The piezometric head in the
Navajo aquifer is approximately 220 feet lower than that of the overlying Entrada Sandstone, as
evidenced by the water levels in the Entrada wells OW1A and OW2 and the Navajo Sandstone well WW -
2 (Table 3-8). This illustrates a high degree of hydrologic isolation provided by the intervening Carmel
Formation.

Hydraulic Conductivity
Testing of the aquifer characteristics at the Shootaring Canyon Facility has most comprehensively been
performed by Hydro-Engineering in support of previous licensing and permitting efforts. Hydro -
Engineering (1999) presents a summary of the measured aquifer response to hydrologic stresses for
both the Entrada Sandstone and the Navajo Sandstone. Table 3-9 summarizes the results of single well
and multi-well tests performed in 1998 and 2013. Slug tests were performed on RM18, RM19 and RM20
in April of 2013 by Wright Environmental Services.

The horizontal hydraulic conductivity (kh) values for the Entrada Sandstone range from 0.01 feet per day
(ft/day) (2.9x10-5 centimeters per second [cm/s]) to 0.28 ft/day (9.8x10-5 cm/s) with an average value of
0.11 ft/day (3.8 x10-5 cm/s) based on 22 values. Blanchard (1986) reports horizontal hydraulic
conductivity values for the Entrada Sandstone ranging from 0.68 ft/day (2.4x10-4 cm/s) to 0.13 ft/day
(4.6x10-5 cm/s). These values are consistent with the range of values measured at the site, though the
higher value reported by Blanchard is 2.5 times the highest value measured at the site. However, this
difference is not large given typical heterogeneities in sedimentary strata.

Hydro-Engineering (1998) performed a multi-well pump test which shows that these fractures are not
continuous enough to separate the Entrada aquifer into separate flow units. The joints do not affect the
overall groundwater flow in this less transmissive aquifer.

Vertical groundwater movement is typically impeded by vertical anisotropy in sedimentary materials.
Blanchard (1986) presents vertical hydraulic conductivity (kv) values ranging from 0.54 ft/day to 0.85
ft/day and horizontal to vertical hydraulic conductivity ratios (k h/kv) values for the Entrada Sandstone
developed from air-entry permeameter lab tests on shallow core samples ranging from 0.80 to 0.24.
This indicates that vertical hydraulic conductivity is actually higher then horizontal, an uncommon
condition in sedimentary strata, unless fracture flow dominates. In contrast, Woodward -Clyde (1984)
states:

“The presence of at least two springs in the Entrada at substantial elevations above the general
water table shows the presence of perched water in the highlands to the north and southeast of
the site, and demonstrates that the vertical permeability of the Entrada ranges significantly from
moderately low to virtually impermeable.”

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

23 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
3.8.2 Perched Water Zone
A localized portion of the Entrada Sandstone with saturated conditions above the uppermost aquifer has
been identified in the active well RM8 and was historically evident in the abandoned well RM9. This
localized perched water zone has water levels approximately 60 feet to 70 feet above the groundwater
levels of the uppermost aquifer observed in all the other Facility wells (e.g., RM1, RM7 and RM20). This
localized perched water condition is caused by a lower hydraulic conductivity (permeability) zone in this
portion of the Entrada Sandstone. This lower permeability zone (previously referred to as the Upper
Entrada by Hydro-Engineering, 1998 and 1999), which decreases the infiltration rate of water, has
caused a zone of perched water in a limited area between the south dam and the cross valley berm. The
perched water condition is localized and is not contiguous with the main Entrada Sandstone. In addition,
inspection of the neutron geophysical log for Well RM20 (Figure 3-19) indicates that the neutron
signature below the lower permeability zone is essentially the same as above the groundwater table
near RM8. This supports the interpretation that the perched water in RM8 and RM9 is not the
uppermost aquifer but a limited and localized saturated system.

The extent of this low permeability zone that creates the perched water condition above the uppermost
aquifer is limited in lateral extent to within the area between the south dam to the south, the cross
valley berm to the north, the mesa cliffs to the west and the sandstone terrace upon which the mill is
located to the east. This is based on interpretation of neutron borehole geophysical logs and monitoring
well water level data, as detailed below.

Wells RM21 and RM22 were installed directly downgradient of the existing tailings cell in an attempt to
identify this perched water zone near the toe of the cross valley berm but no saturated conditions were
encountered. Specifically, the shallow low permeability zone and perched water condition identified in
locations RM8 and RM9 are not present in the following locations.

• On the Western margins of the tailings storage facility:
o Wells RM3 and RM14 as shown in Figure 3-18.
o Well RM11 as shown in Figure 3-17.
• To the North along the cross valley berm:
o Wells RM14, RM19, RM7, RM18 and RM2 as shown on Figure 3-17.
• On the Eastern margins of the tailings storage facility:
o Well RM13 as shown in Figure 3-17.
o Well RM2 as shown in Figure 3-18.
• At or below the south dam:
o Wells RM11, RM15 and RM6 as shown on Figure 3-17.

Where the shallow, low permeability zone is identified in wells RM4 and RM5 near the south dam
(Figure 3-17), it is not saturated. The dip of this localized shallow low permeability zone is to the north
with the top elevation approximately 4,380 feet-above mean sea level (amsl) near the south dam (wells
RM4 and RM5 in Figure 3-17) and approximately 4,290 feet-amsl in wells RM8 and RM9 (Figure 3-19). It
should also be noted that the extension of the low permeability zone identified in wells RM4 and RM5
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

24 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
near the south dam is very near the pre-embankment ground surface while the Entrada Sandstone
groundwater surface is more than 100 feet below the ground surface. These data indicate that the
perched water zone is very limited in lateral extent and is hydrologically separated from the uppermost
aquifer of the Entrada Sandstone. This perched water zone is likely due to a thin lens of siltstone
observed to cause seeps and springs within the Entrada Sandstone (Woodward-Clyde, 1984; Blanchard,
1986).

Water in the perched zone must flow off the low permeability layer to the north, west and east margins
of the low permeability zone into unsaturated sandstone as well as slowly infiltrating vertically through
the lower permeability sandstone unit creating the perched condition. The groundwater percolates
slowly from the perched zone to the underlying main Entrada Sandstone. As illustrated in Figure 3-21,
there is no evidence of distortion of the main Entrada Sandstone ground water table in the area of the
perched zone, indicating that the rate and volume of vertically percolating water from the perched zone
is relatively small.

3.8.3 Carmel Formation
Blanchard (1986) reports that the Carmel Formation acts as an aquitard between the Glen Canyon
Group (Navajo Sandstone) and the Entrada Sandstone. Blanchard reports that a fine-grained unit at the
top of the Carmel Formation is the principal bed that limits groundwater movement between the two
groundwater systems while much of the rest of that Carmel Formation is sandy in the area of the Henry
Mountains. West and northwest of Ticaboo Mesa, about five miles east of the Ticaboo townsite, the
Carmel Formation discharges groundwater at several small seeps.

Determination of groundwater elevation in the Carmel Formation at the Facility has been attempted
through use of observation well (piezometer) OW4. However, based on the lithologic log of well WW -1
and the known construction information for piezometer OW4, the screen zone of OW4 extends into the
bottom of the Entrada Sandstone and, therefore, may not accurately reflect the potentiometric surface
within the Carmel Formation. However, measured water levels in Facility piezometers in the Entrada
Sandstone and the Navajo Sandstone (WESI, 2013) show between 208 feet and 230 feet of head
difference between the two units, indicating that the Carmel Formation does act as a substantial
hydraulic barrier to flow.

No values for the transmissivity or the vertical hydraulic conductivity in the Carmel Formation have been
calculated at the Facility.

3.8.4 Navajo Sandstone
The Navajo Sandstone hosts one of the west’s largest and most prolific high-quality aquifers. Blanchard
(1986) reports that the Navajo Sandstone is the most utilized aquifer in the Lake Powell area and that
most of the wells in the Henry Mountains area are completed in the Navajo Sandstone. Blanchard (1986)
also reports hydraulic conductivity values for the Navajo Sandstone of approximately 3.5 ft/day and
transmissivity values from between 2,626 ft2/day to 3,500 ft2/day.
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

25 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024

Groundwater levels in the Navajo Sandstone at the Facility were established through monitoring of
water supply wells WW-1, WW-2, as well as observation wells (piezometers) OW1B and OW3.
Measured groundwater elevations in the Navajo Sandstone at the Facility ranged from approximately
4,017 feet to 4,026 feet (WESI, 2013) and indicate that the Navajo Sandstone is under artesian
conditions as the piezometric surface is higher than the top of the Carmel Formation (3,980 ft-amsl in
well WW-1).

3.9 Water Resources
Information regarding groundwater and surface water hydrology at the Facility has been described in
previous reports (Woodward Clyde Consultants, 1984; Plateau, 1998c; Hydro-Engineering, 1998; Tetra
Tech, 2008b; Tetra Tech 2008c; Uranium One, 2008; and WESI, 2013) and is summarized in this
Environmental Report.

3.9.1 Surface Water
As reported in the 1997 Environmental Assessment (NRC, 1997) and the 2003 Environmental
Assessment (NRC, 2003), the Facility is located within the 32 square mile Shitamaring Creek watershed,
which in turn is within the larger 132 square mile Hansen Creek watershed (Figure 3-25). All drainages
within these basins are ephemeral, though they can be subjected to large transient flows resulting from
intense precipitation events. The nearest perennial water body is Lake Powell, located approximately
seven miles to the south.

The local surface water drainages at the Facility are alluvium-filled incisions in Entrada Sandstone.
Surface flows in these drainages are rapidly dissipated through percolation into the sandy stream
channel sediments (NRC, 2003). The Facility buildings are located on a small bluff of alluvium -capped
Entrada Sandstone which is not subject to significant surface water flows. The tailings storage facility is
located in a cross-valley constructed disposal cell near the head of a minor and unnamed drainage to
Shitamaring Creek to the west of the Facility. Facility disturbances have limited the surface drainages
contributing to the tailings storage facility area.

Blanchard (1986) reports that the Carmel Formation discharges water at several small seeps West and
northwest of Ticaboo Mesa, about five miles east of the Ticaboo townsite. Woodward-Clyde (1984)
identified several points of groundwater emergence (seeps or springs) in the vicinity of the Facility. The
springs are identified as the seep in Shitamaring Creek west of the tailings storage facility, Lost Spring to
the north of the tailings storage facility and a small spring near Ant Knolls to the south of the tailings
storage facility (Figure 3-26). The Woodward Clyde report (1984) states that the elevations of the Lost
Spring seep (4,470 feet above mean sea level [ft-amsl]) and the seep near Ant Knolls (4,300 ft-MSL) are
both higher in elevation than the groundwater elevation observed in Facility well RM6 (4,242 ft-amsl),
indicating that these seeps could not exhibit or express groundwater from the tailings storage facility.
The seep in Shitamaring Creek west of the Facility (4,230 ft-amsl) is slightly lower the Facility
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

26 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
groundwater elevations. Walking field surveys by Uranium One personnel in 2010 could not locate the
Ant Knolls seep or the Shitamaring Creek seep.

No perennial streams occur at the Facility.

3.9.2 Groundwater
Groundwater is the only water of substantial yield in the vicinity of the Facility.

3.9.2.1 Groundwater Quality
Eleven wells are sampled semi-annually at the Facility (Figure 3-21). Between 2003 and 2023, the
measured values and reported non-detects for analytes for groundwater samples from the Entrada
Sandstone, which is the uppermost aquifer at the Facility, were at or below the respective groundwater
standards. All concentrations in the uppermost aquifer are stable or decreasing and all are below
primary and secondary drinking water standards (ARHC, 2023b; 2024b). Similarly, most concentrations
in the perched water system, monitored by RM8, are below primary and secondary drinking water
standards except arsenic, total dissolved solids, and selenium.

3.9.3 Groundwater Use
Eight groundwater wells, not including those owned by Anfield, were identified from the Utah Division
of Water Rights database (UDWR, 2024) as located within 50 square miles of the Facility (Figure 3-27).
These wells are the water supply wells for Ticaboo. These wells are completed between 1,000 and 1,500
feet below the ground surface.

3.10 Meteorology, Climatology, and Air Quality
The climate in the vicinity of the Facility is semi-arid (steppe), although it varies with elevation and
terrain features. Skies are usually clear with abundant sunshine and annual precipitation is low.
Because of the low humidity, the rate of evaporation is high. Daily ranges in temperature are relatively
large, and winds are normally light to moderate.

The data included in this section are the most recent site-specific information available. The
meteorological station at the Facility was not monitored during the interim shutdown period. A new
meteorological station was built at the Facility in July 2023 (Figure 3-28).

3.10.1 Local Meteorology and Climate
The annual average precipitation from nearest weather station, Bullfrog Basin station 421020 is 5.9 for
the period of station operation from 1968 to 2007 (Table 3-10). Years with significant data missing were
excluded (1990, 1997, 2003, and 2005). Table 3-10 summarizes the average annual precipitation data
for the Bullfrog Basin station and for Hanksville Airport which is approximately 48 miles north of the
Facility. The Bullfrog Basin Station is no longer active and precipitation data are no longer available from
the Hanksville Airport station.
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

27 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024

Average annual precipitation recorded at the Facility from 1980 through 1982 was 6.7 inches (Table 3-
10). Total precipitation recorded at the Facility in the third and fourth quarters of 2023 was 1.38 inches
(Table 3-10).

Most precipitation at the Facility occurs as rainfall; a maximum of about 10 to 25 percent of the annual
total is expected to occur as snowfall on nearby mountain slopes. Precipitation is about 20 inches or
more on the upper slopes of Mount Hillers, north of the Facility.

Two separate rainfall seasons exist in the region. The first occurs in late summer and early autumn,
when occasional moisture-laden air masses from the Gulf of Mexico bring showers and thunderstorms.
The second rainfall period occurs during the winter, when Pacific storms move into the region.

Temperature at the Facility ranged from 22.1 to 101.84 degrees Fahrenheit in the third and fourth
quarters of 2023. Total monthly pan evaporation for those quarters was approximately 44
inches.

3.10.2 Severe Weather Events
Thunderstorms in July and August result in scattered precipitation over the Facility. The usually
intermittent, scattered nature of thunderstorm precipitation is reflected in the data collected during
these months.

Related precipitation is usually light, but a heavy local storm can produce more than an inch of rain in a
day. The maximum precipitation reported to have fallen within 24 hours over a 30 -year period at
Blanding, Utah was 1.98 inches (DOC, 2019). Hailstorms are unusual in this area. Daily maximum
precipitation recorded at the Facility in the third and fourth quarters of 2023 was 0.46 inch.

Maximum short-term precipitation is usually associated with summer thunderstorms, although winter
storms may occasionally deposit comparable amounts.

Strong winds can occur along with the thunderstorms in the spring and summer. The site is also
susceptible to occasional dust storms, which vary in intensity, duration, and time of occurrence. The
basic conditions for blowing dust are found in the general vicinity: wide areas of exposed, dry topsoil;
and occasional strong, turbulent winds. Dust storms usually occur during the warmer months following
frontal passages and are occasionally associated with thunderstorm activities.

Tornadoes have been observed in the general region, but they occur infrequently. As presented in the
1978 Environmental Report (Woodward-Clyde, 1978), the probability of a tornado striking a given point
in the vicinity of the Facility is estimated at 0.000032. The recurrence interval of such an incident is
estimated at 31,000 years. A search of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
National Centers for Environmental Information database identified one tornado occurrence in in
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

28 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
Garfield County between 1990 and 2023. The tornado was an EF1 and caused damage to a business, a
few homes, and cars in Panguitch. Panguitch is located approximately 95 miles west of the Facility. A
tornado risk assessment conducted using historical analysis from NOAA Storm Prediction Center
identified the strike probability within 25 kilometers of the Facility to be zero percent (NOAA, 2024).

3.11 Air Quality
No monitoring stations for the Utah Air Monitoring Network are near the Facility. The nearest
monitoring station is in Enoch, Utah approximately 125 miles west (https://enviro.deq.utah.gov,
February 2024). Potential local sources of total suspended particulates are windblown dust and vehicles
on unpaved roads.

Anfield has performed routine effluent monitoring for the facility beginning during operations and
continuing through 2023. Air samples were collected at one location north of the tailings storage facility,
indicated as location 6 on Figure 3-28. This location is referred to as AP-3 in the routine effluent
monitoring reports and is presented as location AP-10 in the Compliance Monitoring Plan (ARHC, 2018).
Sampling results for 2022 and 2023 are presented in the semiannual Effluent Monitoring Reports (ARHC,
2023a; 2024a). No airborne effluent concentration limits were exceeded in 2023. All results were near
analytical lower limits of detection.

Radon emissions from the tailings storage facility are the primary air emission. As discussed in Section
3.15, no airborne effluent concentration limits were exceeded at the Facility in the last decade and
Anfield complied with the 20 pCi/m2-sec standard for the tailings cell radon flux emissions regulation in
2023 (ARHC, 2023c).

3.12 Ecological Resources
An evaluation of ecological resources was conducted in 2008 and is included as Appendix A (TetraTech,
2008). As part of the evaluation, baseline wildlife and vegetation surveys were conducted. The
objective of the surveys was to assess the study area for habitat associated with special status animal
species and to characterize the vegetation in the study area. The surveys were conducted in compliance
with the regulations set forth in the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and Utah Rule 68-9 (Utah
Noxious Weed Act).

A general wildlife inventory was taken throughout the day of the study. Little wildlife was present at the
time of survey (Table 3-11). Five raptor and three owl species of concern had the potential to occupy the
Facility. No raptor species or signs of raptor presence (nests, feathers, and pellets) were observed. Owl
habitat was not present at the Facility. These results suggest that the Facility does not currently
maintain breeding sites for raptor or owl species. Three bat species of concern had the potential to
occupy the Facility. It was concluded during the survey that habitat for these species is not present. The
Facility contained species of local, common birds including horned larks, sparrows, and ravens . The only
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

29 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
mammals observed on the Facility were desert cottontail rabbits and Hopi chipmunks. Evidence of
coyote presence was seen near the south dam.

Two birds, the yellow-billed Cuckoo and the Gunnison sage-grouse were listed as threatened in 2014
after the 2008 survey. The yellow-billed cuckoo was listed on the Utah sensitive species list and was not
identified in the 2008 survey. The Gunnison sage-grouse is not known to be present in Garfield County.
Additionally, the 2008 survey did not identify potential habitat in the vicinity of the Facility for the
yellow-billed Cuckoo and the greater sage-grouse.
Vegetation (Table 3-11) is predominantly shadscale saltbush (Atriplex confertifolia), greasewood
(Sarcaliatus vermiculatus) and sagebrush (Artemesia tridentate). A small population of salt cedar
(Tamarix ramosissima), an undesirable non-native invasive species, was found at the base of the north
side of the south dam. The vegetation characterization did not find any special status flora in the survey
areas. No rare or threatened plant species were found. Although one patch of salt cedar, as well as
populations of Russian thistle, were found at the Facility. No State of Utah noxious weed species were
identified.
Three plants were listed as threatened or endangered in 2009 and 2013 after the 2008 survey. These
plants, pariette cactus, uinta basin hookless cactus, and the gierisch mallow, are not known to occur in
Garfield County.
3.13 Noise
The nearest resident is 1.4 miles from the Facility. The nearest residence in Ticaboo is 2 miles from the
Facility (Figure 3-5). Noise generated at the Facility is from vehicle traffic, pump operation, and
monitoring well activities. No sensitive noise receptors (e.g., schools and hospitals) are known to be
located near the Facility. The nearest school is located near the Bullfrog Marina 17 road miles south of
the Facility. The nearest hospital is located in Blanding, Utah approximately 124 road miles from the
Facility.

3.14 Historic and Cultural Resources
A cultural survey was conducted in the Facility vicinity as part of the initial application, and no historical
sites within five miles of the Facility were identified (Figure 3-29). A small area of lithic scatter was
identified and the artifacts were salvaged by the State of Utah (NRC, 1997).

The NRC determined, in consultation with the State Historical Preservation Officer (SHPO), that no
properties included in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register would be impacted by Facility
activities (NRC, 1979). In February 1999, the Utah State Historical Society determined that no historic
properties would be impacted by reclamation and decommissioning of the Facility (NRC, 2003).

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

30 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
Condition 9.7 of the License requires Anfield to perform a cultural survey prior to disturbing any areas
not previously surveyed for cultural resources prior to disturbance of those areas. Anfield will notify the
Director and the Office of State Historic Preservation if artifacts are discovered during disturbance.

3.15 Visual and Scenic Resources
The building exteriors are colored in earth-tone shades to blend with the high cliff to the west. A short
stretch of State Highway 276, about two miles northeast of the Facility, provides the only convenient
public view of the Facility (Figure 3-30). From the highway, the only signs of activity at the Facility are
vehicles.

The stacks, one rising about 100 ft and several others about 80 to 90 ft above plant grade, do not appear
in silhouette from the State Highway 276. The largest building in the complex is about 140 ft by 180 ft in
plan dimensions, and about 60 ft high. Other smaller structures, associated with the ore handling,
preparation and conveying systems, have maximum heights of 60 to 70 ft above the general level of the
plant site. The Facility is not visible from the nearest residence (Figure 3-31).

One national recreation area, two national parks, four national monuments, three national forests and
twelve BLM natural areas exist wholly or in part within a 50-mile radius of the Facility. The Facility is not
visible from any of these areas (Figure 3-32).

3.16 Public and Occupational Health
Radium-226 and uranium particulate concentrations are measured at the Facility air monitoring station
and radon concentrations are measured on the current tailings storage facility. The results of the
effluent monitoring and radon flux measurement program are reported in annual reports to the Utah
Division of Environmental Quality (ARHC, 2023a; 2024a; 2023c).

The License requires one 20-hour to 24-hour sampling of the air station each calendar quarter with the
filters composited and analyzed for natural uranium and radium-226 on a semi-annual basis. No
airborne effluent concentration limits were exceeded at the Facility in the last decade.

In 2023, a total of one hundred radon flux measurements were measured on a quarterly frequency,
consisting of twenty-five measurements per quarter. The resulting average radon flux for 2023 was 15.0
pCi/m2-sec (2022 was 10.1 pCi/m2-sec ) with a standard deviation of 8.1 pCi/m2-sec, a minimum sample
measurement of 0.7 pCi/m2-sec (MDL of 0.5) and a maximum sample measure of 37.5 pCi/m2-sec. In
2023, Anfield complied with the 20 pCi/m2-sec standard for the tailings cell radon flux emissions
regulation (ARHC, 2023c).

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

31 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
3.17 Waste Management
Mill tailings and other 11e.(2) Byproduct Material wastes were placed in the current Tailings Storage
Facility. Contaminated wastes are generated as part of the milling process. Used or worn-out
equipment or materials with economic value may be sold and shipped off site only after the equipment
and materials are surveyed and the contamination levels are below the values specified in NRC
Guidelines for Decontamination of Facilities and Equipment Prior to Release for Unrestricted Use or
Termination of Licenses for Byproduct, Source, or Special Nuclear Material, (NRC, 1987). Cleaning of the
equipment and salvageable materials may be necessary to meet the release limitations.

Equipment and materials that do not meet the release limitations and materials which have little to no
salvage value, are currently stored within the restricted area of the Facility. Such materials include filters
and obsolete or worn-out equipment. Non-salvageable, contaminated materials will be placed in the
tailings storage facility as per 10 CFR Part 40 which will ultimately be covered in place. The materials will
be placed in the tailings storage facility in such a manner as to preclude the formation of voids that
could disrupt the tailings cover by subsidence or differential settling.

The temporary storage of contaminated materials within the Facility restricted area is monitored by the
Radiation Safety Officer or designee (RSO), for external gamma radiation and possible posting as a
radiation/contamination area.

Trash, rags, wood chips, and other solid debris, from office buildings, plant buildings, not limited to
florescent light bulbs containing mercury, and batteries, are collected disposed in a licensed facility.

Sewage disposal is conducted in accordance with the requirements of the permit issued by the Bureau
of Water Pollution Control of the Utah State Division of Health. The permit was approved in 1979.

No effluents are released into waters of the United States. Therefore, no request has been made to
obtain a UPDES permit under UAC R317-8-3.

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

32 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
4.0 RADIOLOGICAL AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FROM PROPOSED ACTION
Radiological and other environmental impacts from the Proposed Action have been assessed from
normal operations as well as from accidents at the Facility and from transport of ore and yellowcake to
and from the Facility, respectively.

The basis for environmental monitoring programs for radionuclides was developed using the MILDOS -
AREA modeling code version 4.21 developed by Argonne National Laboratory (MILDOS). MILDOS was
designed as a primary licensing and evaluation tool to provide an accurate analysis of uranium facilities
for critical licensing and regulatory decisions. It is used to perform compliance evaluations and routine
radiological impact analyses for various uranium recovery operations. MILDOS adopts many
assumptions in conjunction with input parameters detailed in United States Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) guidance.
Exhibit C.1 of the License Renewal Application details the use of MILDOS at the Facility for the purpose
of evaluating potential radiological dose impacts for the 2024 License Renewal Application . The
activities addressed include uranium and vanadium milling operations for a maximum of 1,000 tons per
day processing capacity and on-site waste management in the tailings storage facility. Table 4-1 provides
a summary of the MILDOS modeling results.

4.1.1 Non-radiological Impacts
Due to the inherent remoteness of the Facility, non-radiological offsite impacts such as increased noise
and traffic in the area will be minimal. The Facility provides its own electrical power from onsite diesel
power generators. No public power utilities service the Facility.

Non-radiological solid and liquid effluents from routine mill operations are contained within engineered
structures within the Facility and have limited to no potential for offsite impact.

Radon airborne effluents from the single 30.6-acre tailings storage facility are compliant with the
requirements of 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 61 and 10 CFR 40 Appendix A. Non-
radiological gaseous effluents are limited mainly to kerosene evaporation in the solvent extraction
process and ammonia emissions from the yellowcake drying furnace as described the License Renewal
Application. The potential offsite impacts of these emissions are evaluated below.

The kerosene loss due to evaporation was estimated to be 8 gallons (24 kg) per day through three roof
vents operating collectively at 36,000 cfm (1,467,720 cubic meters per day). Given this information, the
daily average kerosene air concentration in the effluent would be 0.0164 mg/m3 (= (24 kg/d*1000
mg/kg)/1,467,720 m3/d). The 8-hour time weighted average (TWA) threshold limit value (TLV) for
kerosene is 200 mg/m3 (ACGIH, 2006). The average effluent concentration at the point of release is
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

33 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
much less than the 8-hour time weighted average threshold limit value. Thus. any potential offsite
human impacts would be minimal.

Using a similar approach for ammonia, the concentration of ammonia in yellowcake dryer stack
emissions is 5 ppm. The 8-hour time weighted average threshold limit value for ammonia is 25 ppm
(ACGIH, 2006). Again, the average effluent concentration at the stack is lower than the 8-hour time
weighted average threshold limit value. Potential offsite human impacts would be minimal.

4.2 Environmental Effects of Accidents
The radioactive materials handled at the Facility have specific activities on the order of 10-9 Ci/g for the
tailings, 10-9 Ci/g for the ore, and 10-6 Ci/g for the refined yellowcake product. Because of the low
specific activities, releases of large quantities are required to produce significant human health and
environmental impacts. Engineering controls generally limit the potential for large -scale releases even
during accidents. However, in the event of an accident exceeding any regulatory reporting threshold,
Anfield will make regulatory notifications consistent with Utah Administrative Code (UAC) R313-15-
1202. Four categories of plant-related accidents involving radioactivity have been considered as well as
releases of hazardous chemicals:

1. Trivial incidents
2. Small releases to the environment
3. Large release to the environment
4. Transportation accidents
5. Releases of hazardous chemicals

Trivial incidents include spills, ruptures in tanks or plant piping containing solutions or slurries, overfilling
process tanks, and the rupture of a tailings pond retention system pipe in which the tailings slurry is
released into the tailings facility. Small releases include failure of the air-cleaning system serving the
concentrate drying and packaging area or in the yellowcake drier.

Large releases include a tornado dispersing material from the mill buildings or tailings storage facility. In
the 1998 license renewal application (Plateau, 1998), a large release of tailings solution off site was
considered. A recent design change calls for the separation of the liquid from the tailings slurry following
placement of the tailings in the tailings storage facility. The liquids will be transferred to the lined
process ponds. The location of the process ponds is such that if a breach of the pond embankment
occurred with a loss of liquid, the liquid would be contained upstream of the south dam within the
restricted area. Therefore, this potential accident has been eliminated from further consideration.

4.2.1 Trivial Incidents Involving Radioactivity
The following accidents at the Facility caused by human error or equipment failure should not result in
the release of radioactive material to the environment. If an accident of this nature occurs, site specific
accident response procedures will be followed.
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

34 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024

Leaks or Ruptures in Tanks or Piping
Uranium-bearing slurries and solutions are contained in several tanks comprising the leach, washing,
clarification, and precipitation stages of the mill circuit. Human error during the filling or emptying of
tanks or the failure of valves or piping in the circuit might be expected to occur several times annually
during normal operations. Large spills from tank failures or uncorrected human error might involve the
release of several hundred pounds of uranium in the liquid phase to the mill floor. However, the entire
content of each tank would be contained within the mill sumps and the spill retention dike and
therefore should not reach the environment.

Rupture of Pipe in the Tailings Disposal System
The maximum throughput of the mill is approximately 1,000 tons of ore per day. Operating three shifts a
day approximately 40 metric tons (44 tons) per hour of sands, silt and clay -sized particles are
transported to the tailings storage facility through the tailings disposal system piping. This material is
transported as a slurry (approximately 49 percent solids), which contains mill chemicals and radioactive
materials. Within the tailings storage facility, the liquids are then separated from the solids and pumped
to the nearby process ponds. Occasional ruptures in the tailings slurry pipeline may be expected to
occur. A rupture would allow liquids to flow into the secondary containment, an 18-inch diameter
polyethylene half pipe supporting the slurry pipeline. The liquids would then flow by gravity to the
tailings storage facility. Fresh water from the mill can then be used to flush any residual materials in the
trough into the tailings storage facility. Should a design for separation of the tailings solution at the CCD
circuit be feasible, the mitigation measures for controlling releases will be designed into the system.

4.2.2 Small Release Involving Radioactivity
The following accidents, caused by human error or equipment failure, are likely to release small
quantities of radioactive materials to the environment. The releases, however, are expected to be small
in comparison with the annual release from normal operations. If an accident of this nature occurs, site
specific accident response procedures will be followed.

Air-Cleaning System Failure in the Yellowcake Drying Area
The off-gases from the yellowcake drying operation, which contain entrained solid particles of
yellowcake, pass through a wet scrubber which collects roughly 98 percent of the solid material,
depending on particle size. Should the scrubber fail, excessive quantities of yellowcake could be released
to the environment. The stack is routinely monitored for uranium and the circuit is checked
approximately every four hours of operation. Under conditions of scrubber failure, drier operations
would be terminated until the scrubber is repaired. Although quantitative data on failures of wet dust
collectors are unavailable, a catastrophic scrubber failure is highly unlikely. Progressive failure, in which
case the plugging of vents causes back pressure, would be readily detectable during operational checks
and result in inefficiencies, rather than complete failure.
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

35 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024

Drying and packaging operations will be terminated when controls are inoperative. When the checks
indicate the equipment is not operating within the range prescribed for peak efficiency, actions shall be
taken to restore parameters to the prescribed range. When this cannot be done without shutdown and
repairs, drying and packaging operations shall cease as soon as practicable. Operations will not be
restarted after cessation due to off normal performance until needed corrective actions have been
identified and implemented. Any such cessations, corrective actions, and restarts will be reported to the
UDEQ/DWMRC in writing within 10 days of the subsequent restart.

Gas Explosion in the Yellowcake Drying Operation
A diesel-fuel-fired furnace is used to dewater the yellowcake slurry after the filter wash operation. The
furnace consists of several hearths enclosed within a large cylinder. The off-gas from the drier is vented
through a wet scrubber. An explosion in the drier or the fuel piping, however, could blow off the duct
work associated with the ventilation system and disperse yellowcake into the mill workspace.

The consequences of explosion accidents are limited by the concentration of heavy material that can be
maintained in the air, estimated to be approximately 100 mg/m3. For a room with a volume on the order
of 1,004 m3, the quantity of yellowcake released to the room air is estimated to be approximately 100g.
Based on the conservative assumptions that (1) all of the material would be swept out into the
environment when the room is ventilated and (2) that 100 percent of the insoluble particles are in the
respirable size range, the office receptor would receive an total effective dose equivalent (TEDE) of 0.3
mrem. The above calculation was made using MILDOS (see Exhibit C.1 of the License Renewal
Application).

If such an event were to occur, downwind unrestricted areas would be surveyed for excess alpha
activity. It is reasonable to expect that typical public land use, such as cattle grazing and recreation, of
the downwind unrestricted areas would be temporarily limited until the areas are surveyed and
reclaimed if needed. Contaminated soils could be removed and recycled through the mill circuit or
disposed of in the tailings storage facility, thereby minimizing any long-term environmental impact.

4.2.3 Large Release Involving Radioactivity
There only conceivable accident that could release large quantities of radioactive materials to the
environment resulting in significant environmental and health impacts assumes that a tornado strikes
the yellowcake processing area. If an accident of this nature occurs, site specific accident response
procedures will be followed.

High winds, thunderstorms and dust devils are frequent in spring and summer and may occasionally
cause slight damage in their paths. Although tornadoes are an infrequent occurrence and tend to be less
destructive than those appearing further east, their maximum probable impact has been estimated. In a
typical tornado, the wind speed approximates 240 mph, of which approximately 190 mph is rotational
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

36 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
and 50 mph is translational. The Facility structures are not designed to withstand a tornado of this
intensity.

The nature of the milling operation is such that little could be done to secure the Facility even with
advance tornado warning. It is not possible to accurately predict the release during such an event. A
conservative approach was adopted where it is assumed that two days' production of yellowcake is in
the process piping (2,480 kg) and will be released. In addition, it is assumed that 48 drums containing 16
metric tons (18 tons) of yellowcake are onsite when the tornado strikes; and that all of the unpackaged
and 15 percent of the containerized material is released. Thus, the tornado is assumed to cause about
4,880 kg (10,736 lb) of yellowcake (equivalent to the contents of fourteen 55 -gallon drums) to become
airborne.

Analysis using MILDOS (see Exhibit C.1 of the License Renewal Application) indicated a total effective
dose equivalent (TEDE) to a Ticaboo resident of 38 mrem while the dose equivalent to the lung was
estimated to be 317 mrem. The total effective dose to the south, southwest resident was calculated to
be 49 mrem while dose equivalent to the lung was estimated to be 387 mrem.

Given this scenario and the estimated ground deposition of uranium in the model output, soil
remediation of unrestricted areas south of the Facility would be required. It is reasonable to expect that
typical public land use, such as cattle grazing and recreation, of the downwind unrestricted areas would
be temporarily limited until the areas are reclaimed. Contaminated soil could be removed and recycled
through the mill circuit or disposed of in the tailings storage facility, thereby minimizing any long-term
environmental impact.

4.2.4 Transportation Accidents

Transportation of material to and from the Facility can be classified into three categories:

1. Shipments of refined yellowcake from the Facility,
2. Shipments of ore from the mine to the Facility, and
3. Shipments of process chemicals from suppliers to the Facility.

An accident in each of these categories has been considered. If a transportation related accident occurs,
site specific accident response procedures will be followed.

Shipments of Yellowcake
The refined yellowcake product is placed in 55-gallon drums, classified by the Department of
Transportation as Type A packaging (49 CFR Parts 171-189 and 10 CFR Part 71), holding an average of
750 lb. It is assumed that the yellowcake will be shipped 2,400 km (1,500 miles) by truck to a conversion
plant in Metropolis, Illinois. The average truck shipment contains approximately 48 drums, or 36,000
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

37 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
pounds of yellowcake. Approximately 48 yellowcake shipments will be occur annually. Published
accident statistics set the probability of a vehicle accident at approximately 1.4 x 10-6/km (DOT, 2003).

The annual probability of a vehicle accident while transporting the yellowcake to the conversion plant is
0.16, or approximately one accident in six years. Using the method proposed in NUREG-0706 (NRC,
1980), a wind speed of 5 m/s, and a release time of 24 hours, the environmental release fraction is
0.009. Assuming all uranium particles are in the respirable size range and a population density of 7.5
persons per square mile, the 50-year collective dose commitment to the lungs of the nearby general
population was calculated to be 0.7 person rems (see Exhibit C.1 of the License Renewal Application).

The assumptions in the calculations are conservative since the spilled yellowcake would be cleaned up
as rapidly as possible to prevent spread of the contamination.

Shipments of Ore to the Facility
While all sources of ore to be milled have not been identified, it is assumed that ore will be hauled in
trucks from the Slick Rock Mine and the Velvet-Wood Mine, both of which are owned by Anfield (Figure
3-7). Ore is assumed to be hauled in trucks a maximum distance of 200 miles . The Slick Rock Mine in
San Miguel County, Colorado is approximately 190 road miles from the Facility. The Velvet -Wood Mine
is approximately 177 road miles from the Facility.

A conservative estimate of the respirable fraction of ore dust in a truck is 0.01 (NRC, 1980). A maximum
of 9,118 or an average of 5,460 trucks per year will be required to supply the mill at full capacity. Using
the accident rate of 0.16 per kilometer and 322 km per roundtrip, three or four accidents are predicted
per year. It should be noted that the NRC (1980) predicts that 55 percent of these accidents will be
minor accidents with no release.

It is estimated (NRC, 1980) that only one percent of the ore is in the respirable range. Applying the same
0.009 release fraction, the average respirable quantity to be released in an accident is only 2.04 kg (4.5
lb). Since the specific activity of the ore is three orders of magnitude less than that of yellowcake, it is
obvious that the radiological exposure to this release is very small. Therefore, it is easy to conclude that
the radiological impact of ore transport is considered insignificant.

Shipments of Chemicals to the Facility
The most serious trucking accident involving the transportation of chemical to the Facility would most
likely involve the shipment of anhydrous ammonia. The probability of a truck accident is 1.4 x 10 -6/km,
but not all of those predicted accidents would release ammonia. If, however, large amounts of
ammonia were released, humans could be impacted.

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

38 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
4.2.5 Releases of Hazardous Chemicals
The potential environmental effects from accidents involving nonradiological material are expected to
be small. Ducting and ventilation systems in the solvent extraction and precipitation areas are designed
to vent and dilute the chemical vapors emitted and protect the workers from hazardous fumes. Failure
of these ventilation systems may result in the short-term collection of these vapors in the building air.
Since the vapors would ultimately be discharged to the atmosphere in either case, such a failure would
have no incremental effect on the environment.

A number of chemical reagents used in the process are expected to be stored in relatively large
quantities at the Facility. Specifically, storage tanks are provided for such materials as sulfuric acid,
ammonia, and sodium chlorate. If an overflow or rupture were to occur, drainage of the liquid reagents
would be contained in the sumps and the spill containment dikes.

Ammonia is a chemical which may seriously impact the environment. This event was assessed in
Plateau Resources’ original application (Plateau, 1996). A break in the ammonia storage tank external
piping would result in only a minor release. The line carrying ammonia to the storage tank from the tank
truck could rupture, in which case the release rate is assumed to be limited to 0.2 lbs (100 g) of vapor.
This would be released outside of the building. The truck delivery person would be trained to respond
by avoiding the plume and advising nearby personnel to clear the area until the cloud disperses. The
resulting concentration of ammonia at 2,000 meters was conservatively estimated to average
approximately 35 mg/m3 over the release period. The Occupation Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) has set the acceptable eight-hour exposure limit at 25 ppm for ammonia and the short-term (15
minutes) exposure level at 35 ppm (ATSDR, 2004). The most restrictive time -weighted average limit for
worker exposure is given as 17 mg/m3 by the American Conference of Government Industrial Hygienists.
Since the exposure duration would be expected to be short compared to exposure in the workplace, no
significant off-site impact should result.

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

39 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
The affected environment discussed in Section 3 was considered with respect to each of the three
alternatives. The following sections and Table 5-1 outline the potential impacts to the affected
environment from each of the three alternatives.

5.1 Topography
Under the Proposed Action, the final surface of the tailings storage facility will be approximately 30 to
50 feet higher than the current ground surface in the footprint of the future tailings storage facility. The
final surface will reach a maximum height of 4436 ft -amsl and will be graded to conform with the
general topography of the surrounding area. This elevation is lower than both the bluff to the west and
the flat mesa which contains the mill buildings.

The final surface of the tailings storage facility under Alternative 3 would be higher than the current
surface of the existing tailings storage facility as an additional 97,000 cubic yards of impacted soil and
equipment would be placed in the existing tailings storage facility. The maximum height of the
reclaimed tailings storage facility would be 4,455 feet-amsl and will be graded to conform with the
general topography of the surrounding area. This elevation is lower than both the bluff to the west and
the flat mesa which contains the mill buildings.

The topography of the Facility would not change under that No Action Alternative.

5.2 Land Use Impacts
The current land use at the Facility is milling. No other land use occurs within the private property
boundary. The land use would not change with any of the three alternatives. The land use of the
surrounding area is controlled by the BLM and would not be impacted by any of the three alternatives.

5.3 Demography and Socioeconomic Impacts
No change to the demography or socioeconomics of the area around the Facility would occur under the
No Action Alternative.

The population of the area surrounding the Facility would increase by approximately 95 people under
the Proposed Action if all Facility workers were new to the area and were to live in Ticaboo which would
increase the population of Ticaboo by 95 percent. Likely most Facility worker s would live in several
nearby communities including, Ticaboo and Hanksville. Salaries paid to Facility workers are higher than
the mean salary of approximately $60,000 in the Garfield County which will increase the economy of the
area surrounding the Facility.

The population of the area surrounding the Facility would increase by approximately 20 people under
Alternative 3 if all reclamation workers were new to the area and were to live in Ticaboo which would
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

40 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
increase the population by approximately 20 percent. Salaries paid to Facility workers are higher than
the mean salaries of approximately $60,000 which will increase the economy of the area surrounding
the Facility for the approximately 18 months of reclamation.

5.4 Transportation Impacts
Traffic projections are based on the available traffic data and contributions from each alternative (Table
3-4). Traffic projections along major Utah roads near the Facility were estimated using a 2.5 percent
yearly rate of increase. Facility related traffic increases to the traffic volumes is provided in Table 5-2.

Non-Facility related traffic projections along Garfield County Road 13383 were estimated using a 2.5
percent yearly rate of increase (Table 5-2).

5.4.1 Proposed Action
Transportation to and from the Facility will primarily involve commuting Facility personnel and service
providers, as well as delivery of consumable items such as ore, diesel fuel, reagents, PPE, and other
materials associated with operating the Facility. In addition, yellowcake and vanadium will be
transported from the Facility to the enrichment facilities and new drums will be delivered periodically.
Ore is assumed to be hauled in trucks a maximum distance of 200 miles. The sources of the ore will
likely be the Slick Rock Mine and the Velvet-Wood Mine, both of which are owned by Anfield (Figure 3-
7). The Slick Rock Mine in San Miguel County, Colorado is approximately 190 road miles from the
Facility. The Velvet-Wood Mine is approximately 177 road miles from the Facility.

Only uncontaminated domestic waste and material or decontaminated material meeting unrestricted
release criteria will be transported from the Facility. The primary modes of transportation are
automobiles and trucks. Transportation of ore, supplies, and yellowcake to and from the Facility and to
the conversion facility is subject to Department of Transportation regulations, and state and local laws.

Facility related traffic increases to the traffic volumes in provided in Table 5-2. The assumptions to the
projected traffic include 25 trucks per day from the Velvet -Wood Mine, 15 trucks per day from the Slick
Rock Mine. Both of these assumptions are based on the maximum daily ore deliveries rather than the
average, to be conservative.

Approximately eight trucks per day are assumed to travel from Interstate 70 to the Facility delivering
consumables and other supplies. Approximately 30 personal vehicles per day were assumed to travel to
the Facility from Ticaboo. Facility related traffic will increase all vehicular traffic on all roads other than
Garfield County Road 13383 between 1 percent and 15 percent (Table 5-2). Truck traffic would increase
by one percent to 100 percent. The 100 percent increase is for the road s from the Velvet-Wood Mine
and on Garfield County Road 13383 as no existing truck traffic was identified on these roads. In general,
truck traffic would increase between 1 and 45 percent on other roads.

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

41 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
Mill traffic on Garfield County Road 13383 would include Facility personnel, delivery of consumable
items such as ore, diesel fuel, empty drums for yellowcake, reagents, PPE, and materials associated with
the Facility and shipment of filled drums of yellowcake. Facility related traffic will add approximately 30
cars and 48 trucks per day to Garfield County Road 13383. The total Facility related traffic on this road
would be less than 150 vehicles per day.

The seven-year projected traffic volumes along Garfield County Road 13383 are well below the range of
300 vehicles per day, which is the traffic volume at which American Association of State Highway and
Transportations Officials recommends paving rural roads. The existing gravel surfaces, with regular
maintenance such as grading, should provide adequate roadways for the Facility and recreational users.

5.4.2 No Action Alternative
No additional truck or Facility traffic would occur as a result of the No Action Alternative.

5.4.3 Alternative 3
For approximately 18 months to 2 years, 20 workers will be employed at the Facility for
decommissioning and reclamation. It is assumed that these workers would live in Ticaboo. These
additional personal vehicles would increase the traffic between Ticaboo and the Facility by
approximately five percent. Intermittent deliveries of equipment and supplies would likely increase
traffic by less than ten percent.

5.5 Geology and Soil Impacts
The Proposed Action would involve excavation of soil impacted by the 1982 tailings spill and grading of
the area for South Cell construction and excavation and construction of the process ponds in portions of
areas that have not previously been disturbed. Soil in this area is predominantly Badland-Rock outcrop
complex with some Moenkopie fine sandy loam. The removal of the impacted soil and grading for
construction of the South Cell will cause irretrievable loss of the soil and bedrock, if any, in this area. As
discussed in Section 3.7, the Badland-Rock outcrop complex has limited use for wildlife and is not
suitable for grazing. Additionally, borrow sources would be disturbed as discussed in Exhibit B.3 of the
License Renewal Application to provide material to complete the reclamation of the Facility. Soil and
rock would be lost in those areas as well.

No areas of the property that are undisturbed would be disturbed in t he No Action Alternative.
Therefore, no soil or bedrock would be lost as a result of this action.

Alternative 3 would result in the excavation of soil impacted by the 1982 tailings spill and other
impacted soil in areas that were previously disturbed. The disturbance would likely involve less than
one acre of the Badland-Rock outcrop complex soil. Additionally, borrow sources would be disturbed as
discussed in the approved Reclamation Plan (Hydro-Engineering, 2005) to provide material to complete
the reclamation of the Facility. Soil and rock would be lost in those areas as well.
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

42 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024

5.6 Water Resources Impacts
No surface water exists at the Facility. Therefore, there would be no impacts to surface water from any
of the alternatives. The NRC identified that the design features of the impoundment as approved in the
Reclamation Plan (Hydro-Engineering, 2003) that would be implemented in Alternative 3 will prevent
any adverse effect to the ephemeral surface waters of the Shootaring Canyon drainage basin and
corresponding flow to the Shitamaring Creek and Hansen Creek drainage basins (NRC, 2003).

The restricted area of the Facility as proposed for the Proposed Action is designed for zero discharge of
surface water. Any precipitation that results in flow inside the restricted area would be routed to ponds
or the tailings storage facility. The cover on the South Cell would slope to promote runoff into designed
channels to facilitate flow.

Under the Proposed Action, the South Cell of the tailings storage facility will be lined with compacted
clay, 60 mil textured high density polyethylene geomembrane, high density polyethylene geonet, 60 mil
textured high density polyethylene geomembrane, and two 10 ounce nonwoven geotextiles (Figure 1 -6).
This engineered liner of the South Cell would act to protect groundwater from the disposed tailings.
Storage tanks will be enclosed in containment structures to ensure that spills do not reach groundwater.

No changes would occur to the Facility that could impact groundwater under the No Action Alternative.

Under Alternative 3, impacted soil would be excavated and placed in the area of existing tailings. The
tailings would then be reclaimed in accordance with the approved Reclamation Plan (Hydro-Engineering,
2005). The NRC (2003) identified that the approved cover for the existing tailings storage facility would
prevent the migration of contaminants from the impoundment.

5.7 Ecological Resources Impacts
Surveys for the presence of threatened and endangered species were conducted for the original
application in the late 1970s and again in 2008 (Appendix A). No threatened and endangered species
were identified in the vicinity of the Facility.

Neither the No Action Alternative nor Alternative 3, would have water impounded that could attract
wildlife. Under the Proposed Action, the South Cell would have water impounded that could potentially
attract wildlife. If wildlife were to solely use the tailings storage facility, impacts could occur. The NRC
assessed impacts to terrestrial and aquatic biota (NRC, 1979) and determined that significant impacts to
wildlife were not expected but the actual extent of those impacts could not be quantified.

5.8 Air Quality Impacts
No air quality impacts are anticipated from the No Action Alternative. Anfield has performed routine
effluent monitoring for the facility beginning during operations and continuing through 2023 as
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

43 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
discussed in Section 3.11. No airborne effluent concentration limits were exceeded in 2022 or 2023. All
results were near analytical lower limits of detection.

Under Alternative 3, short-term impacts to the local ambient air quality from fugitive dust and vehicle
exhaust may occur as a result of excavation, grading, and hauling activities. The NRC (2003) identified
that given the short duration of decommissioning and reclamation and the sparse population, no
significant adverse impacts to members of the public would occur .

The Proposed Action could cause impacts to the local ambient air quality from fugitive dust and vehicle
exhaust as a result of excavation, grading, hauling, truck and personnel vehicle travel to and from the
Facility, the use of diesel generators, and radon from the tailings storage facility.

5.9 Noise Impacts
The NRC (2003) identified that the noise from trucks and other equipment would probably be audible
from areas within 0.3 miles of the Facility. The nearest residence to the Facility is greater than one mile
from the Facility. None of the alternatives would have noise impacts that would be discernable at a
greater distance than that identified by the NRC.

5.10 Historic and Cultural Impacts
Cultural surveys have conducted at the Facility as discussed in Section 3.14. The No Action Alternative
would not involve additional disturbance at the Facility. The Proposed Action would include disturbance
in areas that have previously disturbed or previously surveyed with the potential exception of a portion
of the area where the process ponds would be installed (Figures 3-29 and Figure 1-4). Alternative 3
would disturb no areas that have not been previously disturbed or that have not been previously
surveyed.

Anfield is required by License Condition 9.7 to perform a cultural survey prior to disturbing any areas not
previously surveyed for cultural resources prior to disturbance of those areas. Anfield will notify the
Director and the Office of State Historic Preservation if artifacts are discovered during disturbance. No
impacts to historic or cultural resources would occur under any of the three alternatives.

5.11 Visual/Scenic Resources Impacts
As discussed in Section 3.15 and shown on Figure 3-30, the Facility is visible along a section of Highway
276. It is not visible from the nearest residence (Figure 3-31). The No Action Alternative would change
no Facility features and therefore have no impact on visual or scenic resources. The Proposed Action
involves constructing the South Cell of the tailings storage facility, two process ponds and a few new
structures in the mill area (Figure 1-4). None of the proposed new features would be higher than
current features at the Facility. Therefore, these proposed features would not change the visibility of
the Facility from Highway 276 and would not impact visual or scenic resources. Alternative 3 would
involve removal of the buildings at the Facility, placement of buildings, equipment, and soil above the
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

44 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
release criteria into the existing tailings storage facility and capping that facility. Building removal would
eliminate the visibility of the Facility from Highway 276.

No impacts to visual or scenic resources are anticipated from any of the alternatives.

5.12 Socioeconomic Impacts
Implementation of the Proposed Alternative will require a total staff of approximately 95 at the Facility
for the life of the Facility. In the near term, construction personnel will be imported and require
temporary housing. This is expected to have a significant positive effect on the local area.

The No Action Alternative would have no impacts on the demography or economy of the area.
Alternative 3 is to reclaim and decommission the Facility. Facility staff would be increased to
approximately 20 for the duration of the decommissioning, which is estimated to be 18 months, creating
a positive short-term economic impact on the local area.

5.13 Public and Occupational Health Impacts
The No Action Alternative has a low potential for occupational exposure because routine activities are
conducted by one person. Only routine monitoring and site maintenance is occurring at the Facility. No
milling or construction is occurring.

The potential for occupational exposure under the Proposed Action is intermediate based on milling
activities conducted at the Facility. Facility personnel could potentially be exposed to radionuclides
during operational activities at the Facility. As discussed in Exhibit C.1 to the License Renewal
Application, MILDOS model output identified the person likely to receive the highest dose from the
licensed operation is a hypothetical office worker who spends 2000 hours per year working in the
administrative building, which is outside of the current and proposed restricted area but near the
current and proposed ore stockpile areas. The modeled dose to this individual was a maximum total
effective dose equivalent of 84 mrem per year (mrem/year). This dose was primarily due to radon-222
emanation from the current ore stockpile. Due to the conservatism built into this estimate, it is unlikely
that any member of the public will have the potential to exceed 100 mrem/year which is the public dose
limit.
During operations, any individual working within the restricted area for several days or more will be
trained and managed as a radiation worker. Therefore, it is most appropriate to compare potential
doses nearest the sources to occupational radiation dose limits (5,000 mrem/year total effective dose
equivalent consistent with UAC R313-15-301(1) (a)). Dose estimates distant from the Facility are well
below, less than 5 mrem/year total effective dose equivalent in all occupied areas, the public dose limit
of 100 mrem/year.

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

45 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024

Alternative 3 has a low to intermediate potential for occupational exposure during the 18 -month
reclamation period. Facility personnel could potentially be exposed to radionuclides during reclamation
activities at the Facility.

The public could potentially be exposed to ore and tailings disposed in the tailings storage facility in
Alternative 3 and the Proposed Action. This exposure could result from releases of radon gas and from
direct gamma radiation from the impoundment. Additionally, the public could potentially be exposed to
radiological impacts resulting from soil contaminated with 11e.(2) Byproduct Material.

5.14 Waste Management Impacts
Under the No Action Alternative, equipment and materials that do not meet the release limitations and
materials which have little to no salvage value, are currently stored within the restricted area of the
Facility. Such materials include filters and obsolete or worn-out equipment. The temporary storage of
contaminated materials within the Facility restricted area is monitored by the Radiation Safety Officer or
designee (RSO), for external gamma radiation and possible posting as a radiation/contamination area.

Trash, rags, wood chips, and other solid debris, from office buildings, plant buildings, not limited to
florescent light bulbs containing mercury, and batteries, are collected disposed in a licensed facility.
Sewage disposal is conducted in accordance with the requirements of the Bureau of Water Pollution
Control of the Utah State Division of Health.

Under the Alternative 3, mill tailings and other 11e.(2) Byproduct Material wastes are placed in the
current Tailings Storage Facility. Equipment and materials that do not meet the release limitations and
materials which have little to no salvage value, will be placed in the tailings storage facility as per 10 CFR
Part 40 which will be covered. The materials will be placed in the tailings storage facility in such a
manner as to preclude the formation of voids that could disrupt the tailings cover by subsidence or
differential settling.

Under the Proposed Action, mill tailings and other 11e.(2) Byproduct Material wastes are placed in the
existing tailings storage facility. Contaminated wastes are generated as part of the milling process. Used
or worn-out equipment or materials with economic value may be sold and shipped off site only after the
equipment and materials are surveyed and the contamination levels are below the values specified in
NRC Guidelines for Decontamination of Facilities and Equipment Prior to Release for Unrestricted Use or
Termination of Licenses for Byproduct, Source, or Special Nuclear Material, (NRC, 1987). Cleaning of the
equipment and salvageable materials may be necessary to meet the release limitations.

Equipment and materials that do not meet the release limitations and materials which have little to no
salvage value, will be placed in the tailings storage facility as per 10 CFR Part 40 which will ultimately be
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

46 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
covered. The materials will be placed in the tailings storage facility in such a manner as to preclude the
formation of voids that could disrupt the tailings cover by subsidence or differential settling.

Trash, rags, wood chips, and other solid debris, from office buildings, plant buildings, not limited to
florescent light bulbs containing mercury, and batteries, are collected disposed in a licensed facility.
Sewage disposal is conducted in accordance with the requirements the permit issued by of the Bureau
of Water Pollution Control of the Utah State Division of Health.

No effluents are released into waters of the United States. No impacts from waste management are
anticipated to result from any of the alternatives.

5.15 Unavoidable Adverse Environmental Impacts
Unavoidable adverse environmental impacts associated with operating the Facility includes the release
of small quantities of radionuclides, diesel exhaust from operating the electrical generator and large
equipment, and vehicle exhaust from workers going to and from work. In addition, mill workers hired to
support the operations will be exposed to direct radiation as well as airborne radionuclides.

The incidence of occupational safety accidents and the severity of the accidents are expected to be
similar to those at other operating mills. Other sources for accidents arise from vehicular travel to and
from the Facility. Facility workers will normally drive from nearby Ticaboo or from the Hanksville area.
In addition, it is estimated that a maximum of 40 ore trucks per day will be received at the Facility
creating additional traffic on Highways 191, 95, and 276.

The Proposed Action and the Alternative 3 could potentially create a higher number of industrial
accidents and total radiation exposure than the No Action Alternative since the number of employees
will be greater and the exposure period longer. The Proposed Action could potentially create a slightly
higher radiation exposure than reclaiming and decommissioning the Facility under Alternative 3.

5.16 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitments of Resources
The Proposed Action requires significant energy and water consumption. Diesel generators are used to
supply electrical power to the Facility. Diesel power levels and thus diesel fuel consumption would be
significantly less for Alternative 3, especially over the long term. Also, industrial chemicals are
consumed in the milling process.

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

47 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024

6.0 MITIGATION MEASURES
Three areas of potential adverse impact are identified in Section 4, above, which include potential
impacts to ecological receptors, geology and soil, air quality, the public, and occupational workers. No
mitigations are necessary for impacts from or changes to land use, noise, historical and cultural
resources, visual and scenic resources, socioeconomic, or waste management as discussed in Section 4.

Potential adverse impacts to ecological receptors relate to potential access to and exposure to process
fluids in lined process ponds and the tailings storage facility under the Proposed Action. The ponds and
tailings storage facility will be surveyed daily in accordance with standard operating procedures to
identify if bird use is occurring. If bird use is identified, best management practices and potential
mitigation measures include placement of reflective ribbon on T-posts and placement of predatory
decoy birds (i.e., falcons and owls) around the pond perimeters to create visual deterrents for bird use
of the ponds. Best management practices will continue to be implemented to ensure no adverse
impacts to the other environmental media or receptors occur under the Proposed Action. Section 7.0
discusses ecological monitoring.

Overall potential occupational worker risks from construction, operation, maintenance, and
decommissioning associated with all the alternatives is considered low and potential exposures will be
reduced to ALARA via the use of standard operating procedures, radiation work permits, worker
training, and occupational health monitoring in accordance with the GRP Radiation Protection Plan.

The Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan and the License Renewal Application specifies tailings
storage facility design to limit release of radon and direct gamma radiation. Additionally, radiation
surveys will verify the adequacy of reclamation activities to ensure there will be no significant adverse
radiological impacts to member to the public. The public will be protected from the 11e.(2) Byproduct
Material at the Facility through access controls and land ownership.

The loss soil and rock in the borrow areas for material for construction and reclamation of the tailings
storage facility will be an unavoidable adverse, irreversible, and irretrievable commitments of resources.
These borrow areas will be graded to approximate original grade and reseeded. The soil beneath the
South Cell and other soil at the Facility that has been impacted by 11e.(2) Byproduct Material will be
unavoidable adverse, irreversible, and irretrievable commitment of resources with no mitigation.

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

48 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENTS AND MONITORING PROGRAMS
7.1.1 Operational Airborne Monitoring
Anfield has performed routine effluent monitoring for the facility beginning during operations and
continuing through 2023. Air samples were collected at one location north of the tailings storage facility,
indicated as Location 6 on Figure 3-28. This location is referred to as AP-3 in the routine effluent
monitoring reports and is presented as location AP-10 in the Compliance Monitoring Plan (ARHC, 2018).
Sampling results for 2022 and 2023 are presented in the semiannual Effluent Monitoring Reports (AR HC,
2023b; 2024b). No airborne effluent concentration limits were exceeded in 2022 or 2023. All results
were near analytical lower limits of detection.

During operations, Anfield will demonstrate compliance with public radiation dose limits by
demonstrating that the total effective dose equivalent to the individual likely to receive the highest dose
from the licensed operation does not exceed 100 mrem year-1 using measured concentrations of
radionuclides at environmental sampling stations. All environmental air monitoring sites (Figure 3-28)
are accessible throughout the year, are served by electric power or solar, and meet the criteria for air
particulate monitoring site locations as specified in Regulatory Guide 4.14 (NRC, 1980).

The basis for environmental monitoring programs for radionuclides was developed using the MILDOS -
AREA (MILDOS-AREA code, version 4.21 developed by Argonne National Laboratory) modeling code and
is presented in Exhibit C.1 of the License Renewal Application. This radiological dose model indicates
that potential doses to offsite receptors (Figure 3-5) are unlikely to approach the public dose limits in
UAC R313-15-301 or the ALARA constraint for airborne emissions of radioactive material in UAC R313-
15-101 (Table 4-1).

Environmental particulates are measured using continuous air sampling stations, and radon -222
concentrations are monitored continuously using track etch detectors which are exchanged quarterly
(Table 7-1 and Figure 7-1). The quarterly exchange frequency allows the detector sufficient time to
accumulate a response that is large enough to provide good counting statistics using routine readout
procedures by the vendor.

Action levels for both the stack and environmental monitoring programs are based on sampling results
and trend analyses. If individual environmental sampling results approach 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table
2 effluent concentrations or trends of increasing concentrations as a function of time are observed in
either the stack or environmental sampling results, the RSO will investigate the cause of the trend. If the
air particulates concentrations exceed 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table 2 effluent concentrations, the RSO
promptly notifies management and the UDEQ/DWMRC. Corrective actions, to be developed with
UDEQ/DWMRC, would likely require adjustments, maintenance, or repair of the stack scrubber systems.

7.1.2 Other Environmental Monitoring
The operational monitoring program and interim monitoring programs were designed to meet the
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

49 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
following criteria presented in Regulatory Guide 4.14 (NRC, 1980):
1. Sample vegetation from animal grazing areas near the mill site in the direction of the highest
predicted airborne radionuclide concentrations. 

2. Sample soils and measure gamma radiation at each of the locations chosen for air particulate
samples. 

While exposure to radionuclides in vegetables and meat contributes only a very small fraction of the
potential public dose (see Exhibit C.1 of the License Renewal Application), it is possible that locally
produced food and forage could contribute to human doses. Both soil and vegetation monitoring will
occur at the air monitoring stations (Figure 3-28). Soil and vegetation monitoring programs are intended
to demonstrate that radiological impacts and potential public doses from these pathways are low. Fish
sampling and sediment sampling are not conducted because of the lack of streams flowing through the
facility.
Any increasing trend for a monitored parameter will be investigated by the ERHS/RSO or their staff to
determine the cause and identify potential corrective actions.
A new meteorological station was installed near the administration building on July 20, 2023 (Figure 3-
28). The 10-meter meteorological tower is instrumented with sensors to continuously record wind
speed and wind direction, vertical wind speed, temperature, delta temperature, relative humidity, solar
radiation, barometric pressure, precipitation, and evaporation near ground level. Data integration
duration will be one-hour with hourly recording of mean speed, mean wind direction, and mean wind
stability (as degrees sigma theta). In addition, precipitation, relative humidity, and solar radiation will be
recorded.
The data from the meteorological station will be retrieved monthly by an independent meteorological
contractor where the data will be correlated and presented in a meteorological report, which may be
incorporated into the semiannual effluent monitoring report.
7.2 Ecological Monitoring
Wildlife surveys of the process ponds and the tailings storage facility will be conducted in accordance
with standard operating procedures. If wildlife is identified on the process ponds or the tailings storage
facility, the presence of wildlife and the measures taken to deter wildlife from the ponds are noted on
the Wildlife Observation and Dispersal Form. Any bird death is reported to the appropriate authorities.

7.3 Surface Water Monitoring
No surface water monitoring is proposed. No identified springs are reasonably close and downgradient
from the process facility and no surface water discharges are proposed. Further, all drainages adjacent
to the process facility are ephemeral and only flow in response to short and intense rainfall events.
Sufficient engineered controls on process material and wastes, routine inspections, and other
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

50 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
monitoring are proposed to make sampling of ephemeral surface drainages unnecessary.

7.4 Groundwater Monitoring
Groundwater monitoring for operational conditions will be performed at the ten locations identified on
Figure 7-2, Table 7-2, and detailed in the Groundwater Monitoring Sampling and Analysis Plan (Exhibit
B.4 of the License Renewal Application). The groundwater sampling locations were designed to
promptly identify any potential seepage entering groundwater from the tailings storage facility and
process ponds. The primary monitoring location for prompt detection of potential leakage is the leak
detection system of the double lined pond retention systems in both the process ponds and the tailings
storage facility. All wells are screened in the uppermost aquifer, which is hosted by the Entrada
Sandstone. These wells include:
• upgradient groundwater well (RM1) not influenced by potential Facility operational impacts to
act as an observation point for up gradient water quality trends that are not related to site
activities but that could potentially impact site water quality over time
• point of compliance (POC) groundwater monitoring points (POC 1 through POC 5) for assessing
the tailings disposal cell and Process Pond liner performance (POC 6 through POC 8) for
protecting groundwater quality with respect to groundwater compliance limits
• operational groundwater monitoring wells for assessment of groundwater quality with respect
to potential operational sources (e.g., Well RM2R and the ore stockpile)
The locations of the point of compliance monitoring points were located considering the criteria
stipulated in Regulatory Guide 4.14 (NRC, 1980) and a numerical groundwater flow and transport model
(Exhibit B.5 of the License Renewal Application), which the supports the rationale for point of
compliance well spacing of approximately 400 feet and a 50-foot long screen length that span the water
table. The points of compliance are placed at the downgradient edge of the tailings storage facility
slope and process pond margins (Figure 7-2). Table 7-2 summarizes the well construction information
for existing groundwater program wells and wells for both operation conditions and post -operations
(post-reclamation but before license termination).
If individual sampling results approach 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table I values for groundwater samples
which are obtained within the restricted area of the Facility, or above levels identified in the
Groundwater Discharge Permit UGW170003, or if trends of increasing concentrations as a function of
time are observed, the ERHS/RSO staff investigates the cause of the problem. If the presence of
groundwater contamination is confirmed, the ERHS/RSO promptly notifies management and the
UDEQ/DWMRC as outlined in the Compliance Monitoring Plan and the groundwater Sampling and
Analysis Plan. Corrective actions, to be developed with UDEQ/DWMRC, would likely involve
identification of the source of the contamination and may involve mitigating measures.
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

51 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
When mill reclamation commences, the process ponds will be reclaimed and the wells RM2R, POC 6,
POC 7, and POE 8 will be abandoned in accordance with State requirements. The tailings embankment
will be regraded to a 5 horizontal to 1 vertical slope in accordance with the Reclamation and
Decommissioning Plan (Figure 7-3, also see Exhibit B.3 of the License Renewal Application). This will
require abandonment of POC 3 and POC 4, which will be replaced by wells POC 9 and POC 10 located at
the downgradient toe of the regraded embankment at a comparable spacing and depth as POC 3 and
POC 4 (Figures 7-2 and 7-3, and Table 7-2).
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

52 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024

8.0 SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES
There are no identified adverse impacts to land use, transportation, visual or scenic resources, or
socioeconomics. The potential for adverse impacts has been identified to ecological resources, geology
and soil, air quality, and occupational and public health from all alternatives has been identified (Table
8-1).

The potential for occupational health impacts is low for all alternatives. The No Action Alternative has a
low potential for occupational exposure because routine activities are conducted by one person. The
potential for occupational exposure under the Proposed Action is intermediate based on milling
activities conducted at the Facility. Best management practices and the use of personal protective
equipment, worker training, and monitoring can be utilized to mitigate potential impacts. Alternative 3
has a low to intermediate potential for occupational exposure during the 18-month reclamation period.
Best management practices and the use of personal protective equipment, worker training, and
monitoring can be utilized to mitigate potential impacts.

The public could potentially be exposed to ore and tailings disposed in the tailings storage facility in
Alternative 3 and the Proposed Action. This exposure could result from releases of radon gas and from
direct gamma radiation from the impoundment. Additionally, the public could potentially be exposed to
radiological impacts resulting from soil contaminated with 11(e.)2 Byproduct Material. The Reclamation
and Decommissioning Plan and the License Renewal Application specifies tailings storage facility design
to limit release of radon and direct gamma radiation. Additionally, radiation surveys will verify the
adequacy of reclamation activities to ensure there will be no significant adverse radiological impacts to
member to the public. The public will be protected from the 11(e.)2 Byproduct Material at the Facility
through access controls and land ownership.

Because there are no adverse impacts to any connected surface water, the only potential for adverse
ecological impacts is from continued potential wildlife exposure to contaminated water in the process
ponds and the tailings storage facility. Under the Proposed Action, this potential for exposure and
adverse impacts possible for the time the ponds and tailings storage facility contain fluid . Under the No
Action Alternative and Alternative 3, the ponds and the tailings storage facility do not contain fluid and
there would be no potential impact to ecological resources.

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

53 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024

9.0 REFERENCES
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). 2004. Toxicological Profile for
Ammonia. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health
Service.

American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) 2006. TLVs and BEIs Based
on the Documentation of the threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and
Physical Agents & Biological Exposure Indices .

Anfield Resources Holding Corp. (Anfield). 2018. Compliance Monitoring Plan

Anfield Resources Holding Corp. (ARHC). 2023a. Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Effluent
Report First Half 2023. Anfield Resources Holding Corp. August.

Anfield Resources Holding Corp. (ARHC). 2023b. Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Semi -
Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report First. Anfield Resources Holding Corp. August.

Anfield Resources Holding Corp. (ARHC). 2023c. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAPs) 2023 Radon Flux Measurement Program. UT Air Quality ID 14169

Anfield Resources Holding Corp. (ARHC). 2024a. Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Effluent
Report Second Half 2023. February.

Anfield Resources Holding Corp. (ARHC). 2024b. Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Annual
Groundwater Monitoring Report 2023. August.

Blanchard, P. J. (Blanchard). 1986. Ground-Water Conditions in the Lake Powell Area, Utah.
Technical Publication No. 84, State of Utah, Department of Natural Resources.

Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT). 2024. Average Annual Traffic Data. Access
March 2024.

Environmental Restoration Group, Inc., Tetra Tech, Inc, and Wright Environmental Services, Inc.
(ERG et al.) 2017. Environmental Report for Shootaring Canyon Uranium Processing
Facility, Revision 1a. March.

Hydro-Engineering, 1998. Ground-Water Hydrology of the Shootaring Tailings Site. August 28,
1998. Prepared by Hydro-Engineering, L.L.C., 4685 East Magnolia, Casper, WY 82604.

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

54 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
Hydro-Engineering, 1999. Aquifer Properties of New Wells and Recommended Sampling Rates.
Prepared for Plateau Resources Limited. November.

Hydro-Engineering, 2003. Tailings Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan for Shootaring
Canyon Uranium Project

Hydro-Engineering, 2005. Tailings Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan for Shootaring
Canyon Uranium Project, December. Prepared by Hydro-Engineering, and
Environmental Restoration Group, Inc.

Hunt, C. B.; Averitt, Paul; and Miller, Ralph L., (Hunt et. al., 1953) Geology and Geomorphology
of the Henry Mountain Region. USGS Professional. Paper 228,

Mathis. 2000. Capitol Reef National Park and Vicinity Geologic Road Logs, Utah, in: P.B.
Anderson and D.A. Sprinkel (eds.) Geologic Road, Trail, and Lake Guides to Utah’s Parks
and Monuments Utah Geological Association Publication 29.
http://www.utahgeology.org/uga29Titles.htmUniversity of Utah.

Morton. 1984. Geology of the Mount Ellen Quadrangle, Henry Mountains, Garfield County,
Utah. Loren B. Morton. Brigham Young University Geology Studies Volume 31, Part 1.
December.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 2024. Storm Prediction Center
National Severe Weather Database Browser. Accessed March 2024.

Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI). 2024. Nuclear Energy Fact Sheet 2023.

Plateau Resources, Ltd. (Plateau). 1996. Renewal of License for Operating the Shootaring Mil l,
Source Material License UT 0900480, March 1.

Plateau Resources, Ltd. (Plateau). 1997. Environmental Assessment for Renewal of Source
Material License No. SUA-1371. April 1997, Plateau Resources Limited, Shootaring
Canyon Uranium Mill, Garfield County, Utah.

Plateau Resources, Ltd. (Plateau). 1998a. Renewal of License for Operating the Shootaring
Mill”, Source Material License\SUA-1371\NRC Docket No. 40-8698, March 1, 1998.

Plateau Resources, Ltd. (Plateau). 1998b. Ground-Water Hydrology of the Shootaring Tailings
Site. August 28, 1998. Prepared for Plateau Resources, Ltd. by Hydro -Engineering,
L.L.C.,

Plateau Resources, Ltd. (Plateau)., 2006. Operation of Shootaring Canyon Uranium Mill,
Amendment Request for License Number UT 0900480
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

55 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024

Soil Conservation Service (SCS). 1990.

Tetra Tech, 2008b. Shootaring Canyon Uranium Mill, Tailings Storage Facility Design Report.
May. Prepared for Uranium One USA, Inc.

Tetra Tech, 2008c. Draft Revised Shootaring Canyon Uranium Mill, Tailings Storage Facility
Design Report (draft in progress). October. Prepared for Uranium One USA, Inc.

Uranium One USA, Inc. (Uranium One) 2008. Semi-Annual Ground-water Monitoring of
Shootaring Canyon Facility – 1st Half 2008. August.

US Census Bureau. (Census). 2003. Utah: 2000 Summary Social, Economic, and Housing
Characteristics. April.

US Census Bureau. (Census). 2012. Utah: 2010 Population and Housing Unit Counts. July.

US Census Bureau. (Census). 2024. Quickfacts. Accessed March 2024.

US Department of Commerce (DOC, 2019). Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument-
Grand Staircase, Kaiparowits, and Escalante Canyon Units and Federal Lands previously
included in the Monument that are excluded from the Boundaries Draft Resource
Management Plans and Final Environmental Impact Statement. Washington, D.C.

US Department of Transportation (DOT). 2003. Traffic Safety Facts 2003: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Washington, D.C.

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2024. Form EIA-851Q, Domestic Uranium
Production Report (Quarterly)

US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). 1979. Regulatory Guide 3.8, Preparation of
Environmental Reports for Uranium Mills.

US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). 1980. NUREG-0706. Final Generic Environmental
Impact Statement on Uranium Milling, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards,
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC

US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). 1987. NRC Guidelines for Decontamination of
Facilities and Equipment Prior to Release for Unrestricted Use or Termination of
Licenses for Byproduct, Source, or Special Nuclear Material.

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

56 | Page Environmental Report
April 2024
US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). 1997. Environmental Assessment For Renewal Of
Source Material License SUA-1371 Plateau Resources, Ltd. Shootaring Canyon Uranium
Mill, Garfield County. Utah. April. Docket No. 40-8698. Office Of Nuclear Material Safety
And Safeguards, Division Of Waste Management.

US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). 2003. Environmental Assessment For Plateau
Resources Limited’s Shootaring Canyon Uranium Project, Garfield County, Utah. Division
of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
September. Docket No. 40-8698, License No. SUA-1371.

Utah Department of Workforce Services (UDWS). 2024. Current County Unemployment.
https://jobs.utah.gov/wi/data/library/employment/countyunemployment.html.
Accessed March 27, 2024

Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT). 2024. Average Annual Traffic Data. Access March
2024.

Wright Environmental Services, Inc. (WESI). 2013. Shootaring Canyon Mill Background
Groundwater Quality Report. Prepared for Uranium One Americas Inc. May.

Woodward-Clyde Consultants (Woodward-Clyde). 1978a. June 16, 1980 revision. Environmental
Report, Shootaring Canyon Uranium Project Garfield County. Prepared for Plateau
Resources Limited.

Woodward-Clyde Consultants (Woodward-Clyde). 1978b. June 1978. Supplement S1
Environmental Report, Shootaring Canyon Uranium Project, Garfield County, Utah.
Prepared for Plateau Resources Limited.

Woodward-Clyde Consultants (Woodward-Clyde). 1978c. September 1978. Supplement S2
Environmental Report, Shootaring Canyon Uranium Project, Garfield County, Utah.
Prepared for Plateau Resources Limited.

Woodward-Clyde Consultants (Woodward-Clyde). 1984. Summary of Ground Water Conditions
in the Vicinity of Plateau Resources Limited, Shootaring Canyon Facility near Ticaboo,
Utah.

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

TABLES

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

FIGURES
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

APPENDIX A
BASELINE WILDLIFE AND VEGETATION SURVEY OF THE FACILITY

SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM MILLING FACILITY
LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION
ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT

Radioactive Material License UT 0900480

APRIL 2024

Submitted By:

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
10808 S. River Front Parkway
Suite 321
South Jordan, UT 84095

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

TABLES

Reagents Process
Sulfuric Acid Leach
Sodium chlorate Leach
Flocculent Leach, Countercurrent Decantation, Precipitation
Ammonia Solvent Extraction, Precipitation
Tridecanol, Tertiary Amine, Kerosene Solvent Extraction
Sodium bicarbonate Solvent Extraction
Sodium hydroxide Precipitation
Charcoal (carbon)Precipitation
Table 1-1 Reagents used in the Milling Process
Table 1-2 Plant Stack Emissions
Ore Dump
Pocket
SAG Mill
Leach Tanks
Yellowcake
Centrifuge
and Calciner
Product
Drumming
Laboratory Fume
Hood Manifold
Vanadium
Precipitation
and Ammonia
Removal
Vanadium
Packaging
and Drying
S-11A
S-11B
Emission Control
Equipment
Venturi Wet
Gas Scrubber Demister Venturi Wet
Gas Scrubber
Water Wash
Down
Venturi Wet
Gas Scrubber
Venturi Wet
Gas Scrubber Tier 4 Final Tier 4 Final Tier 4 Final
Collection
Efficiency (percent)99.5 >99.5 99.7 U308 -99.5 99.5 ---
Exit Flow Rate
(cfm)6000 5000 3000 2000 6000 6000
Exit Temperature
(oF)Ambient 60-70 150-200 60 120 120
Exit Diameter (in.)18 18 18 12 18 18
Release Height (ft)a 100 90 90 35 80 80 80 80 80
Note: The amounts of criteria emissions for the diesel generators will be calculated for the Notice of Intent to the Utah Department of Air Quality.
aFeet above ground level
cfm = cubic feet per minute oF = degrees Fahrenheit ft = feet g/m2 = grams per square meter lb/hr = pounds per hour in. = inches
SAG - semi autogenous grinding ppm = parts per million
Effluent
Concentrations/
Emission
Generator Set Exhaust
S-14 S-15 S-15
Ore Dust
0.03-0.05
g/m2
Negligible
amounts of
sulfuric acid
mist and
radon-222
Yellowcake
(90 percent
U308 ) 0.02
lb/hr:
ammonia 5
ppm
Miscellaneous
Vapors
V2 0 5 Dust 0.01-
0.03 g/m3
V205 Dust
0.03-0.05
g/m3
See Note
below.
Stack Number S-1 S-5 S-7 S-12 S-13
See Note
below.
See Note
below.
Table 3-1 Land Cover within 50 Square Miles of the Facility
Land Cover Type Percent of Total Area
Colorado Plateau Blackbrush-Mormon-tea Shrubland 47.28
Colorado Plateau Mixed Bedrock Canyon and Tableland 35.4
Colorado Plateau Pinyon-Juniper Shrubland 3.99
Inter-Mountain Basins Mixed Salt Desert Scrub 2.62
Inter-Mountain Basins Active and Stabilized Dune 2.4
Inter-Mountain Basins Shale Badland 1.7
Colorado Plateau Pinyon-Juniper Woodland 1.5
Inter-Mountain Basins Semi-Desert Shrub Steppe 1.46
Inter-Mountain Basins Semi-Desert Grassland 0.95
Rocky Mountain Cliff and Canyon 0.9
Inter-Mountain Basins Mat Saltbush Shrubland 0.8
Developed, Open Space - Low Intensity 0.33
Inter-Mountain Basins Big Sagebrush Shrubland 0.15
Developed, Medium - High Intensity 0.15
Southern Colorado Plateau Sand Shrubland 0.11
Inter-Mountain Basins Greasewood Flat 0.11
Invasive Southwest Riparian Woodland and Shrubland 0.06
Invasive Annual Grassland 0.04
Open Water 0.03
Invasive Annual and Biennial Forbland 0.02
Rocky Mountain Montane Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest and Woodland 0.02
Inter-Mountain Basins Montane Sagebrush Steppe 0.01
Rocky Mountain Lower Montane Riparian Woodland and Shrubland 0.01
Rocky Mountain Montane Dry-Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest and Woodland 0.002
Table 3-2 Population in the State of Utah and in Counties Near the Facility
County Square
Kilometers Square Miles Population People/km2 People/mi2 Population People/km2 People/mi2 Population People/km2 People/mi2
Garfield 8,329 5,175.15 5,083 0.61 1 5,172 0.62 1 4,735 0.57 0.91
Wayne 3,961 2,461 2,486 0.63 1 2,461 0.62 1.1 2,509 0.63 1.02
San Juan 12,585 7,819.80 14,518 1.15 1.9 14,746 1.17 1.9 14,413 1.15 1.84
Kane 6,421 3,989.95 7,667 1.19 1.19 7,125 1.11 1.8 6,046 0.94 1.52
Iron 6,319 3,926.34 57,289 9.07 17.4 46,163 7.31 14 33,779 5.35 8.60
Plute 1,221 758.44 1,438 1.18 1.9 1,556 1.27 2.10 1,435 1.18 1.89
Beaver 4,157 2,582.90 7,072 1.70 2.7 6,629 1.59 2.60 6,005 1.44 2.32
State of Utah 132,572 82,376.85 3,271,616 24.68 39.70 2,763,885 20.85 33.60 2,233,169 16.84 27.11
Town Square
Kilometers Square Miles Population People/km2 People/mi2 Population People/km2 People/mi2 Population People/km2 People/mi2
Hanksville 3 1.72 158 57 92 314 113 183 344 124 200
Hite 2,615 1,624.80 73 0.03 0.04
Kanab 23 14.44 4,683 202 324 4,312 186 299 4,743 204 328
Monticello 3,593 2,232.66 3,562 1 1.6 3,773 1.1 1.7 3,169 0.9 1.4
Circleville 801 497 1,045 1.3 2.1 1,087 1.4 2.2 972 1.2 2
Ticaboo 267
Notes:
km2 = square kilometers mi 2 = square miles a Census, 2024 c Census, 2003
b Census, 2012
Land Area 2020 Populationa 2010 Populationb 2000 Populationc
Land Area 2020 Populationa 2010 Populationb 2000 Populationc
Population Groups
Population Percentage Population Percentage Population Percentage Population Percentage Population Percentage
Population 3,271,616 5,083 2,486 7,667 14,518
Under 5 years 225,742 6.9 5.5 6.4 5.7 6.1
Under 18 years 902,966 27.6 22.1 22.9 23.2 28.1
65 years and over 392,594 12 24 23.1 23.6 15.2
Population per square mile 39.7 1 1 1.9 1.9
Population Percentage Population Percentage Population Percentage Population Percentage Population Percentage Population Percentage
Total population (2020)3,271,616 5,083 2,486 7,667 14,518 149
White alone 2,944,454 90 4,585 90.2 2,349 94.5 93.9 49 139 93.3
Black or African American alone 52,346 1.6 36 0.7 17 0.7 1 0 0
American Indian and Alaska Native alone 44,167 1.5 152 3 27 1.1 1.8 47 5 3.4
Asian alone 1,466 2.8 66 1.3 27 1.1 1 1 0
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 530 1.2 20 0.4 5 0.2 0.1 0.1 1 0.7
Two or More Races 43 2.9 224 4.4 62 2.5 2.4 2.5
Hispanic or Latino 80 15.1 386 7.6 174 7.0 5.6 6.7
White alone, not Hispanic or Latino 33 76.7 4,336 85.3 2,200 88.5 89.1 45 4 2.7
Labor
In civilian labor force, total percent of population over
16years (2018-2022)69.1 59.3 63.3 57.8 54
In civilian labor force, female percent of population over
16years (2018-2022)61.8 56.5 59.9 60.8 48.3
Income and Poverty
Median household income (in 2022 dollars, 2018-2022)
Individuals below the poverty line 8.2 9.3 11.5 9.2 22.8
U. S. Bureau of Census, Quickfacts, Accessed March 2024
$25,108
Kane County San Juan County
Kane County San Juan County
San Juan CountyKane County
$70,327
Kane County San Juan County
Utah Garfield County Wayne County
$86,833 $56,481 $64,870
Hanksville
Utah Garfield County Wayne County
Utah
Table 3-3 Demographics
Garfield County Wayne County
Utah Garfield County Wayne County
Table 3-4 Daily Vehicle Traffic Data
All Vehicles Trucks All Vehicles Trucks All Vehicles Trucks All Vehicles Trucks All Vehicles Trucks
Colorado 141 104635 SH 141 N/O SH 491 & ROAD 6 560 50 560 50 460 50 520 50
Colorado 141 104638 SH 141 SE/O K8 RD 170 50 170 50 200 50 220 50 220 50
Colorado 141 104637 SH 141 N/O MONTICELLO RD, CR H1, EGNAR 250 40 250 40 270 40 310 50 300 50
Colorado 491 105621 SH 491 NW/O SH 141 3500 760 3500 760 3200 690 2900 630
Colorado 491 105622 SH 491 (OLD SH 666) W/O CR 2.00 @ MP 2800 670 2800 670 260 630 2800 670
Utah 24 015-0095 Goblin Valley State Park vis SR 24 - I-70 781 267 840 288 836 286 803 275 823 48
Utah 24 015-0185 SR 24 Hanksville Buckmaster Draw 5653 2069 6105 2233 5339 2086 5291 1446 5140 343
Utah 70 015-0190 SR 6 West SR 191 North 12596 4724 13603 5101 11901 4659 11795 3700 11463 881
Utah 95 017-0125 SR 276 to Bullfrog Marina via SR 95 - Hite Marina 301 90 324 96 294 116 284 105 282 25
Utah 276 017-0145 SR 95 26 miles South of Hanksville via SR 276 - Ticaboo Lodge 324 85 348 92 316 83 305 80 303 7
Utah 276 017-0150 Ticaboo Lodge via SR 276 - Glen Cyn Natl Rec Area Bndry 627 165 675 177 612 161 591 155 586 14
Utah 276 017-0170 SR 276 - Lake Powell Ferry Dock 126 136 123 119 118
Utah 70 019-0014 SR 19 West Green River 9579 3506 10344 3784 9050 3536 8969 2450 8716 582
Utah 70 019-0015 SR 19 East Green River 10241 4025 11060 4346 9676 3802 9590 3768 9320 900
Utah 70 019-0016 Ranch Exit (Floy)11872 5034 12821 5425 11217 4747 11117 4704 10804 1342
Utah 70 019-0020 SR 191 Crescent Junction Moab 10152 4609 10964 4977 9592 4354 9506 4315 9238 1434
Utah 70 019-0035 SR 128 Cisco Whitehouse 9164 4472 9896 4832 8658 4228 8581 4190 8339 1429
Utah 70 019-0040 North Cisco 8971 4486 9688 4842 8476 4236 8400 4198 8163 1443
Utah 70 019-0041 Ranch Exit (Cottonwood)8952 4476 9667 4832 8458 4227 8383 4189 8147 1441
Utah 70 019-0045 Westwater - Colorado State Line 8190 4095 8845 4420 7738 3867 7669 3833 7453 1318
Utah 128 019-0060 Castle Valley via SR 128 - I 70 364 93 391 100 355 91 343 87 340 6
Utah 191 019-0077 Center St via SR 191 (Main St) - 500 W Moab 16116 4190 15878 4124 14051 4468 14729 4073 14412 709
Utah 191 019-0080 500 W via SR 191 - SR 128 Moab 15150 3939 14926 3891 13209 3887 13846 3358 13548 488
Utah 191 019-0086 SR 279 via SR 191 - Arches Natl Park *ATR* 421 12101 4574 13211 5000 9708 3718 11133 3919 10851 926
Utah 191 019-0090 Arches Natl Park via SR 191 - SR 313 Dead Horse Point 9646 4765 10530 5204 7743 3827 8880 4388 8655 1558
Utah 191 019-0091 SR 313 Dead Horse Point via SR 191 - I 70 Crescent Jct 9501 4693 10373 5126 7627 3769 8746 4322 8524 1535
Utah 95 037-0015 Hite Marina via SR 95 - SR 276 Halls Crossing 199 84 214 90 194 92 187 86 186 28
Utah 95 037-0016 SR 276 Halls Crossing via SR 95 - SR 275 Natural Bridges 451 78 485 83 440 140 425 118 422 18
Utah 95 037-0025 SR 275 Natural Bridges via SR 95 - SR 191 544 298 585 321 531 291 513 281 509 118
Utah 191 037-0080 SR 95 South of Blanding via SR 191 - 800 S Blanding 3428 881 3548 913 3140 830 3848 580 3686 67
Utah 191 037-0085 800 S via Main St (SR191) - 200 N Blanding 3026 826 3132 854 2772 770 3397 573 3254 74
Utah 191 037-0090 200 N Blanding via Main St (SR191) - Dodge Point 3309 953 3425 987 3031 882 3714 693 3557 98
Utah 191 037-0100 Dodge Point via SR 191 - 4th S Monticello 2757 838 2854 867 2526 769 3095 633 2965 98
Utah 191 037-0105 400 S via Main St (SR 191) - SR 491 (Center St) Monticello 3456 1106 3578 1142 3166 1006 3880 863 3716 145
Utah 191 037-0110 SR 491 (Center St) via Main St (SR 191) - 6th N Monticello 8626 2881 8618 2885 7442 2465 7801 1874 7444 339
Utah 491 037-0171 500 E via Center St - Port of Entry Monticello 3804 1404 3774 1390 3081 1135 3313 1219 3232 228
Utah 491 037-0175 Monticello POE via SR 491 - Colorado State Line *ATR* 324 3551 1310 3523 1298 2876 1060 3092 1137 3017 213
Utah 491 037-0195 SR 491 E Monticello via Ucolo Lisbon Rd 113 115 107 107 106
Utah 24 055-0065 SR 95 Hanksville via SR 24 - Goblin Valley State Park 472 148 507 159 485 153 466 147 477 22
Utah 95 055-0085 SR 24 Hanksville via SR 95 - SR 276 *ATR* 414 756 130 840 145 803 256 771 214 790 34
Utah Garfield County Road 13383
2020 2019 2018StateRouteStationDescription20222021
Table 3-5 Soil Series within 50 Square Miles of Facility
MUSYM Soil Description Farmland Acres Percent of
Total Area
3 Badland-Rock outcrop complex Not prime farmland 7682.1 20.03
60 Moffat loamy fine sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes Not prime farmland 4534.9 11.83
36 Glenberg family Not prime farmland 3860.6 10.07
83 Rizno,warm-Rock outcrop complex Not prime farmland 2421.9 6.32
57 Moenkopie fine sandy loam Not prime farmland 2229.3 5.81
20 Canyon family-Rock outcrop complex Not prime farmland 2193.8 5.72
106 Stormitt gravelly loam, 2 to 15 percent slopes Not prime farmland 2105.5 5.49
107 Stormitt extremely bouldery loam, 4 to 30 percent slopes Not prime farmland 2063.6 5.38
64 Monue loamy fine sand Not prime farmland 1988.6 5.19
92 Rock outcrop-Stormitt-Rizno complex Not prime farmland 1350.2 3.52
35 Farb-Farb,very shallow-Rock outcrop complex Not prime farmland 1168.9 3.05
51 Milok-Chipeta complex Not prime farmland 884.5 2.31
23 Chipeta silty clay, 2 to 15 percent slopes Not prime farmland 839.9 2.19
80 Rizno fine sandy loam, 4 to 15 percent slopes Not prime farmland 776.4 2.02
99 Sheppard loamy fine sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes Not prime farmland 756.4 1.97
38 Green River-Myton families complex Not prime farmland 590.8 1.54
34 Farb-Rock outcrop complex Not prime farmland 481.4 1.26
87 Rock outcrop-Arches complex Not prime farmland 357.4 0.93
74 Pennell-Moenkopie-Rock outcrop complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes Not prime farmland 353.1 0.92
59 Moenkopie-Rock outcrop complex Not prime farmland 323.8 0.84
93 Rock outcrop-Travessilla complex Not prime farmland 268.3 0.70
86 Rock outcrop Not prime farmland 261.7 0.68
73 Pennell fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes Not prime farmland 261.2 0.68
69 Otero-Glenberg families complex Not prime farmland 258.5 0.67
63 Montosa family, 4 to 8 percent slopes Not prime farmland 156.5 0.41
15 Blackston gravelly fine sandy loam, 8 to 30 percent slopes Not prime farmland 94.9 0.25
72 Pastern cobbly fine sandy loam, 2 to 15 percent slopes Not prime farmland 64.6 0.17
62 Moffat-Sheppard complex Not prime farmland 10.8 0.03
5 Begay fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes Not prime farmland 7.7 0.02
Table 3-6 Entrada Sandstone Horizontal Groundwater Flow Gradients
Groundwater
Elevation 1
Groundwater
Elevation 1
Lateral
Offset Gradient
(ft-amsl)(ft-amsl)(ft)(ft/ft)
RM1 4271.5 RM14 4256.94 1,000 NA 0.015
RM1 4271.5 RM19 4255.05 1230 298 0.013
RM1 4271.5 RM18 4255.26 1300 705 0.012
RM1 4271.5 RM7 4253.49 1330 482 0.014
RM1 4271.5 RM20 4248.37 2110 NA 0.011
RM1 2 4272.67 RM15 2 4236.05 3025 NA 0.012
RM7 4253.49 RM20 4248.37 660 225 0.008
RM18 4255.26 RM20 4248.37 675 NA 0.01
RM19 4255.05 RM20 4248.37 775 400 0.009
RM14 4256.94 RM20 4248.37 1025 682 0.008
RM202 4248.58 RM15 2 4236.05 930 NA 0.013
RM2R2 4265.16 RM22 4261.51 220 NA 0.017
0.012 Average
0.017 Maximum
0.008 Minimum
ft-amsl - feet above mean sea level 0.003 Standard Deviation
RM2R data from April 20, 2003, RM2 data from January 27, 2003.
From To Distance (ft)
1 November 5, 2023 water level data, except as noted.
2 RM1 data from November 12, 2003.
Shootaring Canyon Mill
Table 3-7 Calculated Vertical Gradient Between Wells RM8 and RM20
Well
Top of Casing Elevation (ft-amsl)4381.77 4380.83
Casing Stick up (ft-amsl)3.1 1.6
Screen Zone (ft., bgs)57 - 77 131-211
Vertical Well Screen Separation (ft.)104 (The difference between the mid-point of each screen zone)
Date
Depth to Water
(ft, bTOC)
Water Elevation
(ft-amsl)
Depth to
Water
(ft, bTOC)
Water
Elevation
(ft-amsl)
Vertical Gradient
(ft/ft)
11/12/03 58.25 4323.52 129.9 4250.93 0.689
11/30/03 56.8 4324.97 129.2 4251.63 0.696
03/23/04 58.4 4323.37 131.09 4249.74 0.699
06/16/04 57.8 4323.97 129.9 4250.93 0.693
09/21/04 58 4323.77 130.0 4250.83 0.692
11/07/04 58.1 4323.67 129.7 4251.13 0.688
03/20/05 57.9 4323.87 130.0 4250.83 0.693
06/12/05 57.9 4323.87 131.3 4249.53 0.706
09/11/05 58 4323.77 130.6 4250.23 0.698
12/13/05 57.8 4323.97 130.1 4250.73 0.695
03/11/06 57.9 4323.87 130.7 4250.13 0.700
06/11/06 57.4 4324.37 130.7 4250.13 0.705
09/20/06 57.8 4323.97 130.8 4250.03 0.702
12/08/06 58.4 4323.37 130.9 4249.93 0.697
03/10/07 56.9 4324.87 130.1 4250.73 0.704
06/25/07 56.5 4325.27 130.1 4250.73 0.708
08/31/07 57.2 4324.57 130.5 4250.33 0.705
12/04/07 57.45 4324.32 131.2 4249.63 0.709
03/26/08 56.95 4324.82 131.50 4249.33 0.717
06/30/08 57.20 4324.57 131.9 4248.93 0.718
09/24/08 57.88 4323.89 131.68 4249.15 0.710
12/15/08 57.33 4324.44 131.57 4249.26 0.714
02/09/09 57.05 4324.72 131.30 4249.53 0.714
04/13/09 56.79 4324.98 131.65 4249.18 0.720
08/24/09 57.17 4324.60 131.70 4249.13 0.717
10/18/09 57.15 4324.62 131.80 4249.03 0.718
02/01/10 56.40 4325.37 131.82 4249.01 0.725
04/12/10 56.20 4325.57 131.20 4249.63 0.721
06/21/10 56.80 4324.97 131.90 4248.93 0.722
08/17/10 56.60 4325.17 131.93 4248.90 0.724
08/30/10 56.60 4325.17 131.93 4248.90 0.724
10/18/10 56.55 4325.22 132.00 4248.83 0.725
01/24/11 56.00 4325.77 131.20 4249.63 0.723
04/11/11 55.90 4325.87 131.90 4248.93 0.731
07/25/11 55.80 4325.97 132.00 4248.83 0.733
10/17/11 56.38 4325.39 132.00 4248.83 0.727
02/23/12 55.40 4326.37 132.00 4248.83 0.737
04/30/12 55.65 4326.12 132.31 4248.52 0.737
07/23/12 55.45 4326.32 132.30 4248.53 0.739
10/01/12 55.82 4325.95 132.25 4248.58 0.735
02/19/13 54.80 4326.97 132.00 4248.83 0.742
05/13/13 55.00 4326.77 132.30 4248.53 0.743
07/15/13 54.90 4326.87 132.35 4248.48 0.745
11/04/13 54.90 4326.87 132.45 4248.38 0.746
02/24/14 54.70 4327.07 132.40 4248.43 0.747
04/28/14 54.70 4327.07 132.50 4248.33 0.748
07/21/14 54.50 4327.27 132.45 4248.38 0.750
10/27/14 54.50 4327.27 132.60 4248.23 0.751
02/23/15 54.20 4327.57 132.60 4248.23 0.754
05/11/15 54.00 4327.77 132.40 4248.43 0.754
08/10/15 54.00 4327.77 132.60 4248.23 0.756
10/19/15 54.10 4327.67 132.40 4248.43 0.753
03/07/16 54.30 4327.47 132.90 4247.93 0.756
04/29/16 53.45 4328.32 132.05 4248.78 0.756
08/04/16 53.75 4328.02 132.35 4248.48 0.756
10/18/16 53.40 4328.37 132.02 4248.81 0.756
02/15/17 54.40 4327.37 132.22 4248.61 0.748
05/02/17 53.39 4328.38 131.83 4249.00 0.754
07/18/17 54.19 4327.58 132.20 4248.63 0.750
10/31/17 53.95 4327.82 132.10 4248.73 0.751
02/20/18 54.00 4327.77 131.90 4248.93 0.749
04/23/18 54.15 4327.62 132.00 4248.83 0.749
07/09/18 54.31 4327.46 132.22 4248.61 0.749
10/09/18 53.40 4328.37 132.00 4248.83 0.756
01/26/19 54.15 4327.62 132.30 4248.53 0.751
04/28/19 53.55 4328.22 132.10 4248.73 0.755
07/28/19 54.20 4327.57 132.40 4248.43 0.752
11/03/19 53.50 4328.27 132.18 4248.65 0.757
02/16/20 53.27 4328.50 132.12 4248.71 0.758
05/24/20 53.43 4328.34 132.05 4248.78 0.756
07/07/20 53.88 4327.89 132.00 4248.83 0.751
10/04/20 54.00 4327.77 132.30 4248.53 0.753
01/22/21 54.00 4327.77 132.30 4248.53 0.753
04/01/21 53.95 4327.82 132.00 4248.83 0.750
07/09/21 54.10 4327.67 132.25 4248.58 0.751
10/03/21 54.18 4327.59 132.30 4248.53 0.751
02/05/22 54.20 4327.57 132.35 4248.48 0.751
04/02/22 53.90 4327.87 132.05 4248.78 0.751
07/09/22 53.92 4327.85 132.50 4248.33 0.756
10/16/22 53.25 4328.52 132.15 4248.68 0.759
03/10/23 53.50 4328.27 132.12 4248.71 0.756
04/22/23 54.40 4327.37 132.31 4248.52 0.749
07/15/23 53.42 4328.35 132.15 4248.68 0.757
11/05/23 54.52 4327.25 132.46 4248.37 0.749
ft-amsl - feet above mean sea level ft/ft - foot per foot
ft, bTOC - feet below top of casing
ft., bgs - feet below ground surface
RM8 RM20
Wells 25-Jan-03 16-Jan-04 21-Sep-04
OW1A 4243.33 4250.23 4233.13
OW2 4247.8 4241.2 4242.2
OW4 4258.99 4241.24 4242.06
OW1B 4026.03 4026.03 4024.5
OW3 4017.58 4017.88 4017.93
OW1A-OW1B 217.3 224.2 208.63
OW2-OW3 230.22 223.32 224.27
ft-amsl - feet above mean sea level
CARMEL FORMATION
NAVAJO SANDSTONE
Measured Difference in Groundwater Elevation (ft)
Table 3-8 Entrada, Carmel, and Navajo Unit Groundwater Elevation Comparison
Groundwater Elevation
(ft-amsl)
ENTRADA SANDSTONE
Theis Theis
Early Time Late Time
RM15 360 ----360 48.13 350 0.14 --Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM1 ----420 --420 56.15 350 0.16 0.0006 Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM2 ----420 --420 56.15 350 0.16 0.0008 Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM3 --560 560 --560 74.86 350 0.21 0.00046 Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM4 560 440 520 --506.67 67.73 350 0.2 0.00037 Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM5 600 650 560 --603.33 80.65 350 0.21 0.00096 Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM6 480 470 490 --480 64.17 350 0.19 0.00033 Hydro-Engineering, 1999
OW1A ----210 --210 28.07 350 0.08 0.00049 Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM1 63 ------63 8.42 60 0.14 --Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM2R 7 ----7.8 7.4 0.99 50 0.02 --Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM3 142 ----134 138 18.45 300 0.06 --Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM4 ------230 230 30.75 385 0.08 --Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM4R 6 ----24 15 2.01 100 0.02 --Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM7 13 ------13 1.74 85 0.02 --Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM8 5 ------5 0.67 35 0.02 --Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM9 11 ------11 1.47 25 0.06 --Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM11 ------1 1 0.13 100 <0.002 --Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM12 20 ------20 2.67 15 0.18 --Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM13 13 ----11.2 12.1 1.62 75 0.02 --Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM14 20 ----9.3 14.65 1.96 100 0.02 --Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM16 6 ----8.4 7.2 0.96 150 0.01 --Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM17 13 ----12.4 12.7 1.7 80 0.02 --Hydro-Engineering, 1999
RM18 ------------350 0.28 --WESI. 2013
RM19 ------------350 0.03 --WESI. 2013
RM20 ------------350 0.12 --WESI. 2013
WW1 15,800 15,700 17,000 16,166.67 2,161.17 400 5.403 --Hydro-Engineering, 1999
OW1B 22,600 21,300 19,800 21,233.33 2,838.48 400 7.096 0.0049 Hydro-Engineering, 1999
OW3 18,800 19,800 19,300 2,580.03 400 6.45 0.005 Hydro-Engineering, 1999
Average Maximum Minimum Standard
Deviation Count
ft/day 0.11 0.28 0.01 0.083 22
cm/s 3.80E-05 9.80E-05 3.50E-06 2.90E-05
ft/day 0.04 0.06 0.02 0.028 2
cm/s 1.40E-05 2.10E-05 7.10E-06 1.00E-05
ft/day 6.316 7.096 5.403 0.855 3
cm/s 2.20E-03 2.50E-03 1.90E-03 3.00E-04
Table 3-9 Aquifer Test Results
RM15 Multi-Well Test Entrada Sandstone
Well
Transmissivity (gpd/ft)
Thickness (ft)
Hydraulic
Conductivity
(ft/day)
Storage Data SourceStraight Line Recovery
Method
Perched Entrada Sandstone
Navajo Sandstone
Average
(gpd/ft)
Average
(ft 2 /day)
Single Well Tests Entrada Sandstone
Multi-Well Test Navajo Sandstone
Hydraulic Conductivity
Entrada Sandstone
Table 3-10 Total Monthly Precipitation Recorded for the Facility and at Selected Regional Stations, 1980-1982 and 2023
Bullfrog
Basin
Marina1
(3822 ft)
Hanksville 1
(4308 ft)
1980 1981 1982 2023 1980 1980
January 1.02 0.00 0.38 NA 1.98 0.59
February 1.04 0.00 0.22 NA 1.27 0.27
March 1.11 0.98 0.16 NA 1.49 1.86
April 0.21 0.08 0.00 NA 0.44 0.32
May 0.18 0.31 0.06 NA 0.52 0.63
June 0.00 0.76 0.00 NA 0.00 0.00
July 0.29 0.53 0.16 0.15 0.08 0.06
August 1.11 0.32 1.94 0.46 0.50 0.23
September 1.33 1.00 1.15 0.07 0.61 2.73
October 0.80 2.13 0.00 0.47 0.50 0.49
November 0.26 0.69 0.89 0.07 0.07 0.10
December 0.28 0.06 0.76 0.16 0.55 0.03
Totals 7.63 6.86 5.72 1.38 8.01 7.31
1 Source: National Climatic Data Center (http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/online/coop-precip.html)
Month
Precipitation (inches)
Facility
(4650 ft)
Ft - feet
NA - not applicable (not collected)
Table 3-11 Species Observed During the June 2008 Survey
American Crow Corvus brachyrhynchos One individual seen flying in
the distance, off property
Chukar Alectoris chukar Female with 8 young
Common Raven Corvus corax Several seen throughout site
Horned lark Eremophila alpestris Observed and heard singing
Mourning Doves Zenaida macroura Several seen throughout site
Song Sparrow Melospiza melodia Near Dam
Songbird Species not verified Several unidentified species
Sparrows Species not verified Several unidentified species
Starlings Sturnus vulgaris Two starling like birds in the
distance in the tailings cell
Swallow Species not verified Several near cliffs
Western King Bird Tyrannus verticalis Southeast of Buildings Near
Water Tank
Coyote Canis latrans Scat
Desert Cottontail Sylvilagus audubonii Several Individuals and Scat
Hopi Chipmunk Neotamius rufus Several Individuals, mainly
along east boundary
Black greasewood Sarcaliatus vermiculatus
Broom snakeweed Gutierrezia sarothrae
Cheat grass Bromus tectorum
Foxtail Alopecurus spp.
Green Mormon Tea Ephedra vividis
Milkvetch Astragalus spp.
Opuntia Opuntia spp
Rabbit brush Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus
Russian thistle Salsola spp.
Sage Artemisia spp
Salt cedar Tamarix ramosissima
Sand dropseed Sporobolus cryptandrus
Shadscale Saltbush Atriplex confertifolia
Spiny hopsage Grayia spinosa
Western salsify Tragopogon dubius
Yucca Yucca glauca
Vegetation Species
Mammal Species
Avian Species
Common Name Scientific Name Notes
Table 4-1 Radiological Dose to Specific Receptors - Environmental MILDOS Model
TEDE Current
Configuration
TEDE Proposed
Configuration
Maximum
Occupancy
(mrem yr -1 )(mrem yr -1 )(hr yr -1 )
Nearest Ticaboo residence 12 12 1.4 6,570 0.50/0.25 West Northwest >21 at 2%
Cowboy Camp 2 3 1.2 4,380 0.00/0.50 Northwest >21 at 1%
Nearest Residence 3 3 2 6,570 0.50/0.25 North Northeast >21 at 10%
Office Worker 84 59 0.02 2,000 0.23/0.00 South Southwest >21 at 16%
% - percent mi - miles
> - greater than
hr yr-1 - hours per year
kts - knots
mrem yr-1 - millirem per year
TEDE - total effective dose equivalent
Receptor
Distance
from Facility
(mi)
Indoor/Outdoor
Occupancy
Fraction
Predominant Wind
Direction (blowing
from)
Wind Speed (kts) and
Frequency
Table 5-1 Alternative Impacts
Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3
No Action Proposed Action Reclamation of the Facility
Topography No change in topography
Final surface of the Tailings Storage
Facility will be 30 to 50 feet higher than
current ground surface but lower than the
surrounding topography
The final surface would be lower than the
maximum height identified in the
Proposed Action but would be higher
than the current ground surface and
lower than the surrounding bluff and
mesa.
Land Use Impacts No change in land use
Land use within the property boundary is
milling and that will not change with
approval of the Proposed Action
Land use within the property boundary is
milling.After reclamation and
decomissioning,all or a portion of the
Facility will be aquired by the
Department of Energy with no access by
the public.
Demography No change in demography
The population of Ticaboo would increase
by 70 people or 70 percent if all Facility
workers settled in Ticaboo.
The population of Ticaboo would
increase by 20 people or 20 percent if all
reclamation workers lived in Ticaboo.
Transportation Impacts No change in transportation
Truck and vehicle traffic will increase
during Facility upgrade and during
operations.The truck traffic to the Facility
would increase
Truck and vehicle traffic will increase
during Facility reclamation and
decommissioning.
Geology and Soil Impacts No change in geology or soil
Excavation of soil impacted by the 1982
tailings spill and grading of the area for
South Cell construction and excavation and
construction of the process ponds in
portions of areas that have not previously
been disturbed.Soil in this area is
predominantly Badland-Rock outcrop
complex with some Moenkopie fine sandy
loam.The removal of the impacted soil
and grading for construction of the South
Cell will cause irretrievable loss of less than
one acre of the soil and bedrock,if any,in
this area.As discussed in Section 3.7,the
Badland-Rock outcrop complex has limited
use for wildlife and is not suitable for
grazing.Additionally,borrow sources
would be disturbed as discussed in Exhibit
B.3 of the License Renewal Application to
provide material to complete the
reclamation of the Facility.Soil and rock
would be lost in those areas as well.
Excavation of soil impacted by the 1982
tailings spill and other impacted soil in
areas that were previously disturbed.The
disturbance would likely involve less than
one acre of the Badland-Rock outcrop
complex soil.Additionally,borrow
sources would be disturbed as discussed
in the approved Reclamation Plan (Hydro-
Engineering, 2005) to provide material to
complete the reclamation of the Facility.
Soil and rock would be lost in those areas
as well.
Water Resource Impacts No change in water resources
The restricted area of the Facility as
proposed for the Proposed Action is
designed for zero discharge of surface
water.Any precipitation that results in
flow inside the restricted area would be
routed to ponds or the tailings storage
facility.The cover on the South Cell would
slope to promote runoff into designed
channels to facilitate flow.
This engineered liner of the South Cell
would act to protect groundwater from the
disposed tailings.Storage tanks will be
enclosed in containment structures to
ensure that spills do not reach
groundwater.
The NRC (2003)identified that the
approved cover for the existing tailings
storage facility would prevent the
migration of contaminants from the
impoundment.
The NRC identified that the design
features of the impoundment as approved
in the Reclamation Plan (Hydro-
Engineering,2003)that would be
implemented in Alternative 3 will prevent
any adverse effect to the ephemeral
surface waters of the Shootaring Canyon
drainage basin and corresponding flow to
the Shitamaring Creek and Hansen Creek
drainage basins (NRC, 2003).
Ecological Resource Impacts No change in ecological resources
The South Cell and process ponds would
have fluid impounded that could
potentially attract wildlife.If wildlife were
to solely use these features,impacts could
occur.The NRC assessed impacts to
terrestrial and aquiatic biota (NRC,1979)
and determined that significant impacts to
wildlife were not expected but the actual
extent of those impacts could not be
quantified.
No change in ecological resources
Air Quality Impacts No change in air quality
The Proposed Action could cause impacts
to the local ambient air quality from
fugitive dust and vehicle exhaust as a result
of excavation,grading,hauling,truck and
personnel vehicle travel to and from the
Facility,the use of diesel generators,and
radon from the tailings storage facility.
The nearest resident is more than one mile
from the Facility and any potential impacts
to air quality would be local.
Short-term impacts to the local ambient
air quality from fugitive dust and vehicle
exhaust may occur as a result of
excavation,grading,and hauling
activities. The NRC (2003) identified that
given the short duration of
decommissioning and reclamation and
the sparse population,no significant
adverse impacts to members of the public
would occur.
Noise Impacts No change in noise
The nearest resident in 1.4 miles east of the
Facility.Construction to upgrade the
Facility and operations at the Facility
would likely not be heard more than 0.3
miles from the Facility
The nearest resident in 1.4 miles east of
the Facility.Equipment operation during
reclamation of the Facility would likely
not be heard more than 0.3 miles from
the Facility
Historic and Cultural Resource Impacts No change in cultural or historic resources
No impacts to cultural or historic resources
as all non-disturbed areas not previously
surveyed will be surveyed before
disturbance.
No impacts to cultural or historic
resources as all non-disturbed areas not
previously surveyed will be surveyed
before disturbance.
Visual/Scenic Resource Impacts No change in visual or scenic resources
The Facility is viewable along a short
stretch of Highway 276.The height of the
Facility and any additional buildings and
features will not be higher than current
features.
The Facility is viewable along a short
stretch of Highway 276.Reclamation
would remove the buildigns which are
visible from Highway 276.
Socioeconomic Impacts No demographic or socioeconomic
impacts
Salaries would be above the median
income of Garfield and the surrounding
counties.Approximately 95 jobs would be
supplied in an area with a 6.7%
unemployment rate.
Salaries would be above the median
income of Garfield and the surrounding
counties.Approximately 20 jobs would
be supplied in an area with a 6.7%
unemployment rate.
Public and Occupational Health Impacts No Public and Occupational Health
Impacts
Public exposure to contaminated soil and
tailings could occur.It is unlikely that any
member of the public will have the
potential to exceed 100 mrem/year which
is the public dose limit.
No additional impacts not identified in
the approved Reclamation Plan.
Nonradiological Impacts No additional non-radiological impacts
Non-radiological gaseous effluents are
limited mainly to kerosene evaporation in
the solvent extraction process and ammonia
emissions from the yellowcake drying
furnace. The average ammonia effluent
concentration at the stack is lower than the
8 hour time weighted average threshold
limit value. Potential offsite human impacts
would be minimal.
No additional impacts not identified in
the approved Reclamation Plan.
Radiological Impacts No additional radiological impacts
Radiologcal impacts during operations are
managed to levels that are ALARA.Post-
reclamation radiologivsl impacvts impacts
are minimized per the proposed
Reclamation and Decommmissioning Plan.
No additional impacts not identified in
the approved Reclamation Plan.
Waste Management Impacts
All wastes generated would be licensed
and managed in existing facilities on-site
under existing procedures,monitoring,
reporting and radiation protection plans.
All wastes generated would be licensed and
managed in existing facilities on-site under
existing procedures,monitoring,reporting
and radiation protection plans.
All wastes generated would be licensed
and managed in existing facilities on-site
under existing procedures,monitoring,
reporting and radiation protection plans.
Affected Environment
Table 5-2 Projected Daily Vehicle Traffic
All Vehicles Trucks All Vehicles Trucks All Vehicles Trucks
All Vehicles
including
Mill
Trucks
including
Mill
Mill percent
of All
Vehicles
Mill percent
of Trucks
Colorado 141 104635 SH 141 N/O SH 491 & ROAD 6 560 50 574 51 683 61 698 76 2 20
Colorado 141 104638 SH 141 SE/O K8 RD 170 50 174 51 207 61 222 76 7 20
Colorado 141 104637 SH 141 N/O MONTICELLO RD, CR H1, EGNAR 250 40 256 41 305 49 320 64 5 24
Colorado 491 105621 SH 491 NW/O SH 141 3500 760 3588 779 4270 927 4285 942 0.4 2
Colorado 491 105622 SH 491 (OLD SH 666) W/O CR 2.00 @ MP 2800 670 2870 687 3416 817 3431 832 0.4 2
Utah 24 015-0095 Goblin Valley State Park vis SR 24 - I-70 781 267 801 274 953 326 993 366 4 11
Utah 24 015-0185 SR 24 Hanksville Buckmaster Draw 5653 2069 5794 2121 6897 2524 6937 2564 1 2
Utah 70 015-0190 SR 6 West SR 191 North 12596 4724 12911 4842 15367 5763 15407 5803 0.3 1
Utah 95 017-0125 SR 276 to Bullfrog Marina via SR 95 - Hite Marina 301 90 309 92 367 109 407 149 10 27
Utah 276 017-0145 SR 95 26 miles South of Hanksville via SR 276 - Ticaboo Lodge 324 85 332 87 395 104 473 182 16 43
Utah 276 017-0150 Ticaboo Lodge via SR 276 - Glen Cyn Natl Rec Area Bndry 627 165 643 169 765 201 795 201 4 0
Utah 276 017-0170 SR 276 - Lake Powell Ferry Dock 126 0 129 0 154 0 184 0 16 0
Utah 70 019-0014 SR 19 West Green River 9579 3506 9818 3594 11686 4277 11694 4285 0.07 0.19
Utah 95 037-0015 Hite Marina via SR 95 - SR 276 Halls Crossing 199 84 204 86 243 103 283 143 14 28
Utah 95 037-0016 SR 276 Halls Crossing via SR 95 - SR 275 Natural Bridges 451 78 462 80 550 95 590 135 7 30
Utah 95 037-0025 SR 275 Natural Bridges via SR 95 - SR 191 544 298 558 306 664 364 704 404 6 10
Utah 191 037-0080 SR 95 South of Blanding via SR 191 - 800 S Blanding 3428 881 3514 903 4182 1075 4222 1115 1 4
Utah 191 037-0085 800 S via Main St (SR191) - 200 N Blanding 3026 826 3102 847 3692 1008 3732 1048 1 4
Utah 191 037-0090 200 N Blanding via Main St (SR191) - Dodge Point 3309 953 3392 977 4037 1163 4077 1203 1 3
Utah 191 037-0100 Dodge Point via SR 191 - 4th S Monticello 2757 838 2826 859 3364 1023 3404 1063 1 4
Utah 191 037-0105 400 S via Main St (SR 191) - SR 491 (Center St) Monticello 3456 1106 3542 1134 4216 1349 4256 1389 1 3
Utah 191 037-0110 SR 491 (Center St) via Main St (SR 191) - 6th N Monticello 8626 2881 8842 2953 10524 3515 10564 3555 0.4 1
Utah 491 037-0171 500 E via Center St - Port of Entry Monticello 3804 1404 3899 1439 4641 1712 4681 1752 1 2
Utah 491 037-0175 Monticello POE via SR 491 - Colorado State Line *ATR* 324 3551 1310 3640 1343 4332 1599 4372 1639 1 2
Utah 491 037-0195 SR 491 E Monticello via Ucolo Lisbon Rd 113 116 0 138 0 163 25 15 100
Utah 24 055-0065 SR 95 Hanksville via SR 24 - Goblin Valley State Park 472 148 484 152 576 181 624 229 8 21
Utah 95 055-0085 SR 24 Hanksville via SR 95 - SR 276 *ATR* 414 756 130 775 133 922 159 970 207 5 23
Utah Garfield County Road 13383 5 0 5 0 6 0 84 78 93 100
Projected 2030
State Route Station Description
2022 Projected 2023
Parameter Locations Condition Frequency Method Analytical Parameters
Stack S-1 (ore dump pocket)Semiannually Grab sample and flow rate
Stack S-7 (yellowcake dryer)Quarterly
Isokinetic sample derived
from EPA stack method 5 and
flow rate
Environmental monitoring
stations During operations
Continuous; weekly filter change
or as required by dust loading;
quarterly composited
Composited filters sent to
offsite laboratory for analysis
Downwind of impoundment and
ore stockpiles During interimA operations Quarterly
Filter collection for 20 hours;
composited semiannually and
sent to offsite laboratory for
analysis
Natural uranium,
radium-226
Radon Environmental monitoring
stations During operations Quarterly Track etch or equivalent Radon-222
External
radiation
Environmental monitoring
stations During operations Quarterly OSLs
Vegetation Environmental monitoring
stations During operations Annually
Grab sample of forage three
times during spring growing
season
thorium-230, radium-
226, lead-210
Soil Environmental monitoring
stations During operations Annually Grab sample of surface soil
Natural uranium,
thorium-230, radium-
226
Meteorology Onsite meteorology station Continuous Continuous
Wildlife Tailings storage facility and
process ponds When fluids are present Daily Record visual observations
OSL - optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters
A Interim operations are defined as periods where the mill is NOT in operation for 30 days or more.
B - List of analytes in the annual groundwater monitoring sampling and analysis plan.
Table 7-1 Environmental Monitoring Excluding Groundwater
Airborne
Particulates
Stacks
Natural uranium,
thorium-230, radium-
226, lead-210
Table 7-2 Compliance Monitoring Wells
RM1 10226358.7 1873050.47 3 487 2.3 4449.4 220-480 157-487 225 L, S Yes Yes Submersible Pump Upgradient of Facility Semi-Annual
RM2R 10224989.2 1874379.63 5 300 1.2 4504.86 250-300 242-300 273 L, S Yes Yes Submersible Pump Operational
(Ore Stockpile)Semi-Annual
POC 1 **4**2**(a)**L, S Yes Yes Submersible Pump POC-Tailings
/Operations Semi-Annual
POC 2 **4**2**(a)**L, S Yes Yes Submersible Pump POC-Tailings
/Operations Semi-Annual
POC 3 **4**2**(a)**L, S Yes Yes Submersible Pump POC-Tailings
/Operations Semi-Annual
POC 4 **4**2**(a)**L, S Yes Yes Submersible Pump POC-Tailings
/Operations Semi-Annual
POC 5 **4**2**(a)**L, S Yes Yes Submersible Pump POC-Tailings
/Operations Semi-Annual
POC 6 **4**2**(a)**L, S Yes Yes Submersible Pump POC–Process
Pond/Operations Semi-Annual
POC 7 **4**2**(a)**L, S Yes Yes Submersible Pump POC–Process
Pond/Operations Semi-Annual
POC 8 **4**2**(a)**L, S Yes Yes Submersible Pump POC–Process
Pond/Operations Semi-Annual
POC 9 **4**2**(a)**L, S Yes Yes Submersible Pump POC-Tailings/Post-
Operations Semi-Annual
POC 10 **4**2**(a)**L, S Yes Yes Submersible Pump POC-Tailings/Post-
Operations Semi-Annual
(a) Field parameters are static water level, pH, temperature and conductivity
(b) Stabilized field parameters are pH and conductivity
L- Groundwater Level Measurement
S - Groundwater quality sample collection and analysis
POC - Point of Compliance
Coordinate system is local coordinates
lsd- depth below land surface
Sample Method Well Purpose FrequencyWellDataRecord Field
Parameters (a)
Record Stabilized
Field Parameters
(b)
Slotted
Casing
(ft - lsd)
Sand Pack
(ft - lsd)
Pump Intake
(ft - lsd)
North
Coordinate
South
Coordinate
Casing
Diameter (in)
Well Total
Depth
(ft -mp)
Stick up
(ft)
Measuring
Point
Elevation
(ft amsl)
Table 8-1 Summary of Environmental Consequences
Impacts Actions to Mitigate Impacts
Unavoidable Adverse/Irreversible and
Irretrievable Commitments of
Resources/Short-and Long-Term Impacts
Adverse Impacts Actions to Mitigate Impacts
Unavoidable Adverse/Irreversible and
Irretrievable Commitments of
Resources/Short-and Long-Term Impacts
Adverse Impacts Actions to Mitigate Impacts
Unavoidable Adverse/Irreversible and
Irretrievable Commitments of
Resources/Short-and Long-Term Impacts
Ecological Resource Impacts None NA NA
The South Cell and process ponds would have
fluid impounded that could potentially attract
wildlife.If wildlife were to solely use these
features,impacts could occur.The NRC assessed
impacts to terrestrial and aquatic biota (NRC,
1979)and determined that significant impacts
to wildlife were not expected but the actual
extent of those impacts could not be quantified.
Best management practices and potential
mitigation measures include placement of
reflective ribbon on T-posts and placement
of predatory decoy birds (i.e., falcons and
owls) around the pond perimeters to create
visual deterrents for bird use of the ponds.
None None NA NA
Occupational Health Impacts
The No Action Alternative has a low
potential for occupational exposure
because routine activities are conducted by
one person and routine monitoring not
milling is occuring . Public exposure to
contaminated soil and tailings could occur.
It is unlikely that any member of the public
will have the potential to exceed 100
mrem/year which is the public dose limit.
Use personal protective equipment,
training, and monitoring. Public exposure
pathway eliminated through land
ownership and long-term active
containment.
NA
Overall intermediate occupational risks from
operations and maintenance activities. Public
exposure to contaminated soil and tailings
could occur. It is unlikely that any member of
the public will have the potential to exceed 100
mrem/year which is the public dose limit.
Use personal protective equipment,
training, and monitoring. Public exposure
pathway eliminated through land
ownership and long-term active
containment.
None
Occupational exposures related to one-
time decomissioning and reclaiming of
Facility which has previously been
identified in the approved Reclamation
Plan.Public exposure to contaminated soil
and tailings could occur.It is unlikely that
any member of the public will have the
potential to exceed 100 mrem/year which
is the public dose limit.
Use personal protective equipment,
training, and monitoring. Public exposure
pathway eliminated through land
ownership and long-term active
containment.
None
Geology and Soil None NA NA
Excavation of soil impacted by a 1982 tailings
spill and grading of the area for South Cell
construction and excavation and construction
of the process ponds in portions of areas that
have not previously been disturbed.Soil in this
area is predominantly Badland-Rock outcrop
complex with some Moenkopie fine sandy loam.
The removal of the impacted soil and grading for
construction of the South Cell will cause
irretrievable loss of less than one acre of the soil
and bedrock,if any,in this area.As discussed in
Section 3.7,the Badland-Rock outcrop complex
has limited use for wildlife and is not suitable for
grazing.Additionally,borrow sources would be
disturbed as discussed in Exhibit B.3 of the
License Renewal Application to provide material
to complete the reclamation of the Facility.Soil
and rock would be lost in those areas as well.
Regrade and reseed borrow areas.
Rock and soil in the area of the tailings
storage facilty and in borrow areas would
be irreversible and irretrievable
commitments of resources.
The impacts to the borrow areas would
potentially be short term as these areas will
be reseeded with an approved see mix.
Excavation of soil impacted by the 1982
tailings spill and other impacted soil in
areas that were previously disturbed.The
disturbance would likely involve less than
one acre of the Badland-Rock outcrop
complex soil.Additionally,borrow
sources would be disturbed as discussed in
the approved Reclamation Plan (Hydro-
Engineering,2005)to provide material to
complete the reclamation of the Facility.
Soil and rock would be lost in those areas
as well.
Regrade and reseed borrow areas.
Rock and soil in in borrow areas would be
irreversible and irretrievable commitments
of resources.
The impacts to the borrow areas would
potentially be short term as these areas will
be reseeded with an approved see mix.
Air Quality Impacts None NA NA
The Proposed Action could potentially cause
impacts to the local ambient air quality from
fugitive dust and vehicle exhaust as a result of
excavation,grading,hauling,truck and
personnel vehicle travel to and from the Facility,
the use of diesel generators,and radon from the
tailings storage facility.The nearest resident is
more than one mile from the Facility and any
potential impacts to air quality would be local.
Air quality impacts during operational phases of
the mill are expected to be below Federal and
State standards.Anfield will control fugitive
dust and radon releases from the tailings
impoundment through spraying and interim
soil covers.Spraying will be used to control dust
emissions from ore stockpiles which are not
immediately processed.
Anfield will control fugitive dust and radon
releases from the tailings impoundment
through spraying and interim soil covers.
Spraying will be used to control dust
emissions from ore stockpiles which are not
immediately processed and on roads.
None
Short-term impacts to the local ambient
air quality from fugitive dust and vehicle
exhaust may occur as a result of
excavation,grading,and hauling activities.
The NRC (2003)identified that given the
short duration of decommissioning and
reclamation and the sparse population,no
significant adverse impacts to members of
the public would occur.
Anfield will control fugitive dust and radon
releases from the tailings impoundment
through spraying and final covers. Spraying
will be used to control dust emissions.
None
Alternative 3 - Reclamation and Decommissioning
Affected Environment
Alternative 1 - No Action Alternative Alternative 2 - Proposed Action
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

FIGURES
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 1-1
Location of Shootaring Canyon
Uranium Milling Facility
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 1-2
Land Ownership
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 1-3
Facility Features
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 1-4
Proposed Action
Facility Features
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: April 2024
FILE:
Figure 1-5
Proposed Action
Process Flow Diagram
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 1-6
Proposed Action
Tailings Storage Facility Cross Section
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 2-1
Alternative 3
Tailings Storage Facility Reclamation
Source: Hydro-Engineering, 2005
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 2-2
Alternative 3
Facility Features
Source: Hydro-Engineering, 2005
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 2-3
Alternative 3
Tailings Storage Facility Cover Cross Section
Source: Hydro-Engineering, 2005
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-1
Bureau of Land Management
Grazing Allotments
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-2
Bureau of Land Management
Natural Area
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-3
Land Cover
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-4
Populated Area
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-5
Nearest Residence
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-6
2020 Census Population
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-7
Transportation Corridors
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-8
Facility Roads
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-9
Traffic Count Stations
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-10
Henry Mountains Basin Cross Section
Source: Hydro-Engineering, 2005
Facility
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
Source: Hunt, et. al., 1939
Property Boundary
FIGURE 3-11
Regional Geologic Map
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-12
Facility Geologic Column
Modified from Tetra Tech, 2008
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-13
Facility Geologic Map
Source: Tetra Tech, 2008
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-14
Joint Orientations
Source: Woodward Clyde, 1978
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-15
Mapped Fractures and Joint Sets
Source: GeoTrans, 2008
PZ3
PZ2
PZ1
PZ4PZ5
PZ6
RM
1
RM2
R
M
3
R
M
4
R
M
5
R
M
6
RM
7
RM
8
RM9
R
M
1
0
R
M
1
1
RM
1
2
R
M
1
3
RM
1
4
R
M
1
5
OW
3
O
W
4
WW
1
OW
2
OW
1
B
OW
1
A
950
'
WW
2
580'
SCALE: 1"=250'
MILL
OFFICE
RM17
RM4R
RM16
RM
2
R
CROSS VALLEY BERM
SHOO
T
A
R
I
N
G

D
A
M
RM
1
9
RM
1
8
RM
2
1
RM
2
2
RM
2
0
(AFTER HYDRO-ENGINEERING, 1998)
RM1
RM8
PZ1-PZ3
ENTRADA WELL
PERCHED WATER ZONE WELL
DAM PIEZOMETER
OW3
OW4 CARMEL WELL
NAVAJO WELL
--LEGEND--
ABANDONED WELL (NAME UNDERLINED)RM10RM9
1'
3
2
2'
3'
1
LIMITS OF EXISTING
TAILINGS
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
FIGURE 3-16
LOCATION OF WELLS AND GEOLOGIC
CROSS SECTIONS
PROJECT:
DATE:
FILE:
ANFIELD
FEBRUARY 2024
2024-01-Basemap
?
2000 600400400
300
1
200
100
RM11
NEUTRON (API)
9000
0
27001800
100
300
200
CARMEL FORMATION
400
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
?
4000200400 600
300
200
100
NEUTRON (API)
18000900
0
2700
400
0 200 400 600
2000 400600
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
300
200
1800
NEUTRON (API)
WELL RM150
900
700
WELL RM5
NEUTRON (API)
0 900 1800 2700
100
0
2700
ENTRADA SANDSTONE
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
6000200400400
300
200
100
900
NEUTRON (API)
0
0 27001800
1'
?
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
WELL
RM16WELL
RM4WELL RM4RWELL
RM6WELL
RM13WELL
RM17WELL
(OFFSET)
400
300
200
100
0
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
0 700350
0 2700
1700SANDSTONE
LOWER K
SANDSTONE
LOWER K
4200
3950
4000
3900
4150
4050
4100
4300
4350
4250
4500
4400
4450
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
,

F
T
-
M
S
L
4240.35 4251.44 4239.724239.70 4238.82 4236.05 4238.07 4245.214243.58
ABANDONED WELL DATA (12/03)
(AFTER HYDRO-ENGINEERING, 1998)
EXISTING LAND SURFACE
WELL DEPTH PRIOR
DEEPENING IN 1999
WELL LOCATION, TOTAL DEPTH, AND
SLOTTED OR OPEN HOLE INTERVAL
?
?
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
FIGURE 3-17
GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION 1-1'
PROJECT:
DATE:
FILE:
ANFIELD
MARCH 2024
2023-11-XSECT-FIGS
WELL RM2
4200
3950
4000
3900
4150
4050
4100
0400
300
600200400
NEUTRON (API)
WELL RM3
4300
4350
4250
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
200
100
2
4500
4400
4450 0
0 27009001800
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
6004000200400
300
200
2700
WELL RM7
100
NEUTRON (API)
0
0 900 1800
2000400 600400
300
200
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
NEUTRON (API)
100
900
0
0 27001800
2'
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
,

F
T
-
M
S
L
ENTRADA SANDSTONE
CARMEL FORMATION
EXISITNG LAND SURFACE
WELL
RM2R
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
6004000200400
300
200
2700
WELL RM18
100
NEUTRON (API)
0
0 900 1800
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
6004000200400
300
200
2700
WELL RM19
100
NEUTRON (API)
0
0 900 1800
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
6004000200400
300
200
2700
WELL RM14
100
NEUTRON (API)
0
0 900 1800
4246.52
4256.94
4255.05 4255.26 4261.37
ABANDONED WELL DATA (12/03)
ACTIVE AND MONITORED WELL DATA (11/23)
(AFTER HYDRO-ENGINEERING, 1998)
4260.26
NOTE:
WELLS RM20 AND RM21 ADJACENT TO WELLS RM18 AND RM19
DO NOT SHOW ANY SATURATION IN THE UPPER ENTRADA
ABOVE THE ENTRADA WATER TABLE.
TOP OF CLAY LINER
BELOW TAILINGS
WELL LOCATION, TOTAL DEPTH, AND
SLOTTED OR OPEN HOLE INTERVAL
?
?
?
?
?
?
??
?
?
LOWER K
SANDSTONE
LOWER K
SANDSTONELOWER K
SANDSTONE
?
??
4253.49
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
FIGURE 3-18
GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION 2-2'
PROJECT:
DATE:
FILE:
181692
MARCH 2024
2013-01-XSECT-FIGS
CARMEL FORMATION
ENTRADA SANDSTONE
SANDSTONE
LOWER K
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
400 0
200
300
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
200 400 600
400
?200
300
NEUTRON (API)
900
WELL RM15
100
0
0
3
1800 2700 0
100
6004002000
?
18009000 2700
WELL RM9
NEUTRON (API)
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
400
200
300
6000200400
0
100
0
NEUTRON (API)
WELL RM7
27009001800
ENTRADA SANDSTONE
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
300
400 0 200 400 600
NEUTRON (API)
WELL RM1
100
200
0
0 900 1800
3'
2700
?
X-VALLEY BERMSHOOTARING DAM NORTH DIKE
WELLRM12
WELL T4
WELLRM10
700 2700
7000400
300
200
100
0
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
1700
350
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
6004000200400
300
200
2700
WELL RM20
100
NEUTRON (API)
0
0 900 1800
LOWER K SANDSTONE
4200
3950
4000
3900
4150
4050
4100
4300
4350
4250
4500
4400
4450
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
,

F
T
-
M
S
L
4271.654271.50
4253.494248.37
4308.01
4248.27 4236.05
ABANDONED WELL DATA (12/03)
ACTIVE AND MONITORED WELL DATA (11/23)
4327.25WELL RM8
(AFTER HYDRO-ENGINEERING, 1998)
NOTE:
RM8 DEFINES UPPER WATER LEVEL
ADJACENT TO RM20. WELLS RM7, RM14,
RM21 AND RM22 SHOW THAT THE UPPER
SATURATION DOES NOT EXTEND TO THESE
AREAS.
TOP OF CLAY LINER
BELOW TAILINGS
EXISTING LAND
SURFACE
WELL LOCATION, TOTAL DEPTH, AND
SLOTTED OR OPEN HOLE INTERVAL
?
??
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
FIGURE 3-19
GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION 3-3'
PROJECT:
DATE:
FILE:
181692
MARCH 2024
2013-01-XSECT-FIGS
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-20
Soil Units
4271.50
4260.26
4256.94
4255.264253.49
4255.05
PZ1
PZ4PZ5
PZ6
RM1
RM3
RM4 RM5 RM6
RM7
RM10RM11
RM12
RM13
RM14
RM15
RM17
RM4R
RM16
RM19
RM18
RM21RM22
4271.65
<4289.7 <4280.3
MILL
AREA
CROSS VALLEY
BERM
NORTH
CELL
MAIN
TAILINGS
DAM
SOUTH
CELL
PZ2
PZ3RM9
4327.25
4248.68RM8RM20
EXISTING TAILINGS
DISPOSAL CELL
4305 4
3
0
0
42
9
5
42
9
0
4
3
1
5
43
1
0
4
3
0
5
4
3
0
0
42854280
RM2
RM2R
4270
4265
4260
4255
4250
4245
4260
4260.26 MILL
AREA
OW3 OW4
WW1
OW2
OW1B
OW1A
4234.2
4250.6 (1/16/04)
RM2
RM2R
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
FIGURE 3-21
GROUNDWATER ELEVATION IN THE PERCHED
ZONE AND ENTRADA AQUIFER,
NOVEMBER 2023
PROJECT:
DATE:
FILE:
ANFIELD
FEBRUARY 2024
2024-01-Basemap
SCALE: 1"=250'
(AFTER HYDRO-ENGINEERING, 1998)
--LEGEND--
4254.22
4325.95
NOTE:
WATER-LEVEL ELEVATION FOR THE MAIN
ENTRADA AQUIFER IN THIS SOUTHERN
AREA IS BASED ON 2003 DATA.
WATER-LEVEL ELEVATION IN FEET-msl
PERCHED WATER ZONE
ENTRADA PIEZOMETRIC SURFACE
PERCHED WATER ZONE PIEZOMETRIC SURFACE
RM1
RM8
PZ3
ENTRADA WELL
PERCHED WATER ZONE WELL
DAM PIEZOMETER
OW3
OW4 CARMEL WELL
NAVAJO WELL
0 200 400
Scale 1" = 400'
INSET
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-22
Time Series of Measured Groundwater Elevations
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-23
Water Levels and Calculated Vertical
Gradient between RM8 and RM20
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-24
Formations and Deep Wells
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-25
Hansen Creek Watershed
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: April 2024
FILE:
Figure 3-26
Seeps or Springs
Identified in 1984
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-27
Groundwater Wells within 50 Square Miles
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-28
Proposed Environmental Air Monitoring Locations
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-29
Cultural Survey Areas
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-30
View of Facility from Highway 276
Facility
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-31
View of Facility from Nearest Resident
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-32
National Units within
50-mile radius of the Facility
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 7-1
Proposed Environmental Monitoring Locations
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 7-2
Operational Groundwater
Monitoring Locations
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: APRIL 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 7-3
Groundwater Monitoring Wells
Post-Operations
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

APPENDIX A
BASELINE WILDLIFE AND VEGETATION SURVEY OF THE FACILITY

Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey
of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site,
Garfield County, Utah

Prepared for:

Uranium One

3801 Automation Way
Fort Collins, Colorado 80525
[phone]

Prepared by:

Tetra Tech

3801 Automation Way, Suite 100
Fort Collins, Colorado 80525
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Tetra Tech Project No. 181692/113

July 8, 2008

Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site Uranium One
Tetra Tech July 8, 2008 i
TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................1
1.1 Project Description......................................................................................................1
1.2 Site Description...........................................................................................................1
2.0 WILDLIFE HABITAT SURVEY ..............................................................................................4
2.1 Key Animal Species on Proposed Project Site ...........................................................4
2.2 Wildlife Observation Methods .....................................................................................5
2.2.1 Avian Species ............................................................................................................7
2.2.2 Mammals....................................................................................................................8
2.2.3 Reptiles and Amphibians...........................................................................................8
2.3 Wildlife Observation Results .......................................................................................8
2.3.1 Avian..........................................................................................................................8
2.3.2 Mammals....................................................................................................................9
2.3.3 Reptiles and Amphibians...........................................................................................9
3.0 VEGETATION SURVEY.......................................................................................................10
3.1 Vegetation Survey Methods......................................................................................10
3.2 Vegetation Survey Results........................................................................................10
3.3 Rare Plant Survey.....................................................................................................10
3.4 Noxious Weed Survey...............................................................................................13
4.0 CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................................................................15
5.0 REFERENCES .....................................................................................................................16

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1. List of Garfield County Animal Species of Concern........................................................4
Table 2. List of Animal Species of Concern with Potential Habitat at the Shootaring Mill Site .....5
Table 3. Avian Species Observed During the Shootaring Mill Site Survey...................................9
Table 4. Mammal Species Observed During the Shootaring Mill Site Survey..............................9
Table 5. Vegetation Species Observed During the June 2008 Shootaring Mill Site Survey......10
Table 6. Federally Listed Threatened and Rare Species in Garfield County, Utah ...................12
Table 7. Utah State Listed Noxious Weeds ...............................................................................13

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1. Location of Shootaring Canyon Processing Facility .....................................................2
Figure 2. Existing Conditions, Shootaring Canyon Uranium Mill Site ..........................................3

Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site Uranium One
Tetra Tech July 8, 2008 ii

LIST OF PHOTOS
Photo 1. Example of a Typical Wildlife Observation Point...........................................................6
Photo 2. Tailings Cell Area at the Shootaring Mill Site .................................................................7
Photo 3. Salt Cedar (Tamarix ramosissimaan) at Base of Dam ................................................14

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix A: Garfield County Species of Concern

Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site Uranium One
Tetra Tech July 8, 2008 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Description
The Shootaring Canyon Uranium Processing Facility (Mill) is located 5.6 km (2.6 miles) north of
the town of Ticaboo, Utah in Garfield County Utah (Figure 1). Until recently the inoperable mill
was owned by Plateau resources. Plateau resources operated the mill for a brief period in 1982,
but the mill has been decommissioned since that period. Recent interest in uranium has enticed
Uranium One, Inc. to purchase and reopen the mill. Revisions to the long-term design for the
tailings storage facility, which consist of constructing two 40-acre cells, and making the facility
feasible for operations, are underway. Uranium One is planning to resume operations as soon
as these improvements to the facility are complete and approval of the Renewal License
Application is obtained from the Division of Radiation Control, Utah Department of
Environmental Quality.

Baseline wildlife and vegetation surveys were conducted in anticipation of operation
commencement. Pursuant to Utah Rule 313-24-3 a re-evaluation of site conditions is required to
update the existing Environmental Report (ER). The objective of the surveys was to assess the
study area for habitat associated with special status animal species and to characterize the
vegetation in the study area. The surveys included:

ƒ A ground survey to assess potential special status animal species habitat within and
nearby areas of proposed development,
ƒ A general bird and mammal identification survey, and
ƒ Vegetation characterization (includes T&E, noxious weeds and wetland/riparian
habitat).

The surveys were conducted in compliance with the regulations set forth in the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and Utah Rule 68-9 (Utah Noxious Weed Act). The field work
was conducted by Ms. Simone Vannoy and Mr. Vic Meyer.

1.2 Site Description
The Mill site is encircled by a fence encompassing 265 acres (Figure 2). The area includes an
existing tailings site, a milling area, an ore stockpile area, and a quarry area. The wildlife and
vegetation survey occurred within this fenced area.

The climate in the area is classified as arid with an average annual precipitation of
approximately 7 inches. The majority of the precipitation is in the form of rain. Average annual
snowfall depth is approximately 12 inches. Average annual evaporation for the area is
approximately 66 inches. Temperatures in the area range from -33 degrees F to 97 degrees F
(Lyntek, 2008).

The Mill site is located within a valley that narrows to the south of the existing South Dam.
There is a steep butte that runs along the west side of the property with elevations over 4,700
feet above mean sea level (AMSL), whereas much of the Mill site ranges in elevation from 4,360
to 4,470 feet AMSL. A number of low-lying sandstone mesas are located across the site.
These types of cliffs and mesas can be important habitat for cliff nesting animals such as
raptors, cliff swallows (Petrochelidon pyrrhonota), and Mexican spotted owls (Strix occidentalis).
Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site Uranium One
Tetra Tech July 8, 2008 2

Figure 1. Location of Shootaring Canyon Processing Facility

Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site Uranium One
Tetra Tech July 8, 2008 4
2.0 WILDLIFE HABITAT SURVEY
2.1 Key Animal Species on Proposed Project Site
Table 1 lists all the designated species of special concern in Garfield County, Utah. This
includes federally and state listed endangered or threatened (T&E) species, species of concern,
and those receiving special management under a conservation agreement. Many of these
species require wetland or riparian habitat, which were not found and are not known to occur on
the Site. These species are generally found in the Henry Mountains located approximately 25
miles north west of the Mill site. Also located within Garfield County is a portion of the Colorado
River, located about 20 miles to the south of the Mill site. Due to lack of sufficient habitat, many
of the animals listed in Table 1 can be excluded from this survey. Table 2 lists only those
species of concern with the potential to inhabit the Mill site. Appendix A lists all the species of
concern, their associated habitat, and an explanation as to their potential occurrence at the Mill
site.

Table 1. List of Garfield County Animal Species of Concern
Common Name Scientific Name State Status
Amphibians and Reptiles
Arizona Toad Bufo microscaphus SPC
Common Chuckwalla Sauromalus ater SPC
Desert Night Lizard Xantusia vigilis SPC
Western Toad Bufo Boreas SPC
Avian
American white Pelican Pelecanus erythrorhynchos SPC
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus S-ESA
Burrowing Owl Athene cunicularia SPC
California Condor Gymnogyps californianus S-ESA
Ferruginous Hawk Buteo regalis SPC
Greater Sage-Grouse Centrocercus Urophasianus SPC
Lewis’s Woodpecker Melanerpes lewis SPC
Long-Billed Curlew Numenius americanus SPC
Northern Goshawk Accipiter gentilis CS
Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus SPC
Prairie Falcon Falco mexicanus SPC
Short-eared Owl Asio flammeus SPC
Southwestern Willow Flycatcher Empidonax traillii extimus S-ESA
Spotted Owl Strix occidentalis S-ESA
Three-toed Woodpecker Picoides tridactylus SPC
Yellow-billed Cuckoo Coccyzus americanus S-ESA
Fishes
Bluehead Sucker Catastomus discobolus CS
Bonneville Cutthroat Trout Oncorhynchus clarkii utah CS
Bonytail Gila elegans S-ESA
Colorado Pike Minnow Ptychocheilus lucius S-ESA
Colorado River Cutthroat Trout Oncorhynchus clarkii pleuriticus CS
Flannelmouth Sucker Catostomus latipinnis CS
Humpback Chub Gila cypha S-ESA
Leatherside Chub Gila copei SPC
Roundtail Chub Gila robusta CS
Gastropods
Black Canyon Pyrg Pyrgulopsis plicata SPC
Utah Physa Physella utahensis SPC
Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site Uranium One
Tetra Tech July 8, 2008 5
Table 1. List of Garfield County Animal Species of Concern (continued)
Common Name Scientific Name State Status
Mammals
Allen’s Big-eared Bat Idionycteris phyllotis SPC
Big Free-tailed Bat Nyctinomops macrotis SPC
Brown Grizzly Bear Ursus arctos S-ESA
Fringed Myotis Myotis thysanodes SPC
Henry Mountain Bison Herd Bos bison SPC
Kit Fox Vulpes macrotis SPC
Mule Deer Odocoileus hemiounus SPC
Pygmy Rabbit Brachylagus idahoensis SPC
Spotted Bat Euderma maculatum SPC
Townsend’s Big-eared Bat Corynorhinus townsendii SPC
Utah Prairie Dog Cynomys parvidens S-ESA
Western Red Bat Lasiurus blossevillii SPC
S-ESA Federally-listed or candidate species under the Endangered Species Act.
SPC Wildlife species of concern.
CS Species receiving special management under a Conservation Agreement in order to preclude the need
for Federal listing.
Utah Division of Wildlife, 2007

Table 2. List of Animal Species of Concern with Potential Habitat at the Shootaring Mill
Site
Common Name Scientific Name Status
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus S-ESA
Big Free-tailed Bat Nyctinomops macrotis SPC
Burrowing Owl Athene cunicularia SPC
California Condor Gymnogyps californianus S-ESA
Ferruginous Hawk Buteo regalis SPC
Fringed Myotis Myotis thysanodes SPC
Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus SPC
Prairie Falcon Falco mexicanus SPC
Short-eared Owl Asio flammeus SPC
Spotted Bat Euderma maculatum SPC
Spotted Owl Strix occidentalis S-ESA
Townsend’s Big-eared Bat Corynorhinus townsendii SPC
S-ESA Federally-listed or candidate species under the Endangered Species Act.
SPC Wildlife species of concern.
CS Species receiving special management under a Conservation Agreement in order to preclude the need
for Federal listing.

2.2 Wildlife Observation Methods
The survey was conducted June 4, 2008 by Tetra Tech biologists Vic Meyer and Simone
Vannoy. Observations were made throughout the day. The morning temperature was 71
degrees F, with overcast skies. There was a fresh wind of 19 to 24 mph (Beaufort scale code 5).
The mid-day temperature was 77 degrees F with cloudy skies and rain clouds to the northwest.
There was a fresh wind of 19 to 24 mph (Beaufort scale code 5). The afternoon temperature
was 77 degrees F, partly cloudy and stormy skies to the north. There were moderate winds of
13 mph (Beaufort scale code of 4). Later that evening a severe storm moved through the area
with extremely strong winds and rain.

Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site Uranium One
Tetra Tech July 8, 2008 6
All roads surrounding the Mill site were driven on June 4, 2008 in both the morning and
afternoon surveys, escorted by an employee of Uranium One. Due to a high level of security at
the Mill site, the survey was not allowed to take place unaccompanied. The midday survey
occurred outside the parameters of the Mill site in order to observe the cliffs for long periods of
time. Several observation points were established from which to observe wildlife. Photo 1 shows
an example of a typical observation point. Cliffs, trees, and sky were observed for signs of
animals for ten to twenty minutes at each point. Observations also took place en route between
observation points.

Photo 1. Example of a Typical Wildlife Observation Point

On-foot surveys were conducted in areas of particularly good habitat or when signs of wildlife
were observed (e.g. nests, animal tracks, or searching for nests of observed birds). On foot
surveys were also conducted at each of the tailings cell areas to identify the potential use of
these areas by wildlife species (Photo 2).

Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site Uranium One
Tetra Tech July 8, 2008 7

Photo 2. Tailings Cell Area at the Shootaring Mill Site

2.2.1 Avian Species
2.2.1.1 Special Status Species
A Mexican spotted owl (Strix occidentalis) survey was conducted during daylight hours to
investigate the potential for habitat. It was concluded that there is not sufficient habitat for the
owl at the Mill site; therefore, night time owl calling survey was not conducted. Previous spotted
owl surveys at nearby mining facilities have not indicated the presence of spotted owls in this
area of Garfield County.

Observations for suitable burrowing owl habitat were made during daylight hours. Burrowing owl
habitat consists of open meadow areas and is usually associated with prairie dog, ground
squirrel, badger or armadillo burrows. All areas with meadow or grassland characteristics at the
Mill site were walked in order to identify burrowing owl habitat. Short-eared owls are found in
open habitats such as grasslands and shrublands. All such areas were inspected for relevant
habitat.

Several species of raptor are included in the Garfield County list of species of special concern
(Table 1). All raptor species, regardless of their protection status were included in the survey.
Surveys were conducted under the guidelines established by the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS 1999).

Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site Uranium One
Tetra Tech July 8, 2008 8
2.2.1.2 Other Avian Species
Appendix A lists all the avian species of concern for Garfield County and their habitat
requirements. Aside from the above listed raptor species, no other Garfield County bird species
with special status were determined to have habitat at the Mill site. A general bird survey was
conducted to identify the species that may be using the Mill site.

2.2.2 Mammals
2.2.2.1 Special Status Species
Four bat species of special concern have the potential to occur at the Mill site (Table 2). They
are the big free-tailed bat (Nyctinomops macrotis), fringed myotis (Myotis thysanodes), spotted
bat (Euderma maculatum), and Townsend’s big-eared bat (Corynorhinus townsendii). These
bats prefer wooded or forested areas, but at times can be found in man-made structures.
Observations for roosting habitat were made in the daylight hours. Due to the strict security
policy at the Mill site and the severe evening storm, nighttime observations for bats was not
possible.

2.2.2.2 Other Mammal Species
A general mammalian survey was conducted to identify the species that may inhabit the Mill
site. Rabbits, coyotes (Canis latrans) and small rodents are known to inhabit this particular area
of Garfield County, Utah. All areas were carefully inspected for tracks, scat, signs of foraging,
and any other signs of mammalian presence.

2.2.3 Reptiles and Amphibians
No reptile or amphibian species of special concern habitat exist at the Mill site. Amphibian
species require aquatic habitat and the Mill site is completely devoid of all but ephemeral
drainage creeks, which are not suitable habitat for amphibious species. Opportunistic
observations of reptiles were made while walking the Mill site.

2.3 Wildlife Observation Results
The results of the biological surveys conducted at the Mill site on June 4, 2008 are presented in
the following section.

2.3.1 Avian
2.3.1.1 Special Status Species
No nesting habitat for burrowing owls, spotted owls or short-eared owls were observed. There
were no signs of owl presence with in the areas walked at the Mill site. There were very few
areas of potential raptor nesting habitat. No raptor nests or raptor signs (scat, feathers, etc.)
were observed.

2.3.1.2 Other Avian Species
A complete list of bird species observed at the Mill site can be found in Table 3. Common birds
of the area include horned larks (Eremophila alpestris) and common ravens (Corvus corax).
Most of the avian species observed were along the east fence of the property. A female chukar
with 8 chicks was seen in this area, attracting the attention of two nearby ravens.

Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site Uranium One
Tetra Tech July 8, 2008 9
Table 3. Avian Species Observed During the Shootaring Mill Site Survey
Common Name Scientific Name Notes
American Crow Corvus brachyrhynchos
One individual seen flying in the
distance, off property
Chukar Alectoris chukar Female with 8 young
Common Raven Corvus corax Several seen throughout site
Horned lark Eremophila alpestris Observed and heard singing
Mourning Doves Zenaida macroura Several seen throughout site
Song Sparrow Melospiza melodia Near Dam
Songbird Species not verified Several unidentified species
Sparrows Species not verified Several unidentified species
Starlings Sturnus vulgaris
Two starling like birds in the
distance in the tailings cell
Swallow Species not verified Several near cliffs
Western King Bird Tyrannus verticalis SE of Buildings Near Water Tank

2.3.2 Mammals
2.3.2.1 Special Status Species
Daytime surveys for potential bat habitat were conducted. No roosting areas or cliff ledges
containing bat guano were identified. The lack of a water source and wooded habitat more than
likely discourages large bat populations at the Mill site.

2.3.2.2 Other Mammal Species
Coyote (Canis latrans) scat was seen in several areas near the dam. However, no coyote were
observed during the survey. Second hand testimony of a bobcat sighting near the east fence by
an employee was reported. Cottontail rabbits and Hopi chipmunks were abundant along the
east fence of the property. Table 4 summarized the mammal observations.

Table 4. Mammal Species Observed During the Shootaring Mill Site Survey
Common Name Scientific Name Notes
Coyote Canis latrans Scat
Desert Cottontail Sylvilagus audubonii Several Individuals and Scat
Hopi Chipmunk Neotamius rufus
Several Individuals, mainly along
east boundary fence.

2.3.3 Reptiles and Amphibians
Only one lizard was seen during the Mill site survey. A positive identification of the lizard was
not made. No snakes or signs of other reptiles (tracks, skin, etc.) were observed on the Mill
site.

Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site Uranium One
Tetra Tech July 8, 2008 10
3.0 VEGETATION SURVEY
3.1 Vegetation Survey Methods
Prior to field activities, existing information was reviewed to determine the potential occurrence
of Threatened and Endangered species, rare species, noxious weeds, and wetland species.

The vegetation community within the Mill site boundaries was characterized during the June
2008 visit. The survey focused on disturbed and undisturbed portions of the Mill site. The
vegetation survey was performed on foot, and species were identified and recorded when
encountered. The survey also focused on documenting rare, endangered, or sensitive species,
as well as noxious or invasive weeds.

3.2 Vegetation Survey Results
Vegetation at the new and existing tailings cells are predominantly shadscale saltbush (Atriplex
confertifolia), greasewood (Sarcaliatus vermiculatus) and sagebrush (Artemesia tridentate). A
small population of salt cedar (Tamarix ramosissima), an undesirable non-native invasive
species, was found at the base of the north side of the dam. Table 5 presents the results of the
vegetation survey.

Table 5. Vegetation Species Observed During the June 2008 Shootaring Mill Site Survey
Common Name Scientific Name
Black greasewood Sarcaliatus vermiculatus
Broom snakeweed Gutierrezia sarothrae
Cheat grass Bromus tectorum
Foxtail Alopecurus spp.
Green Mormon Tea Ephedra vividis
Milkvetch Astragalus spp.
Opuntia Opuntia spp
Rabbit brush Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus
Russian thistle Salsola spp.
Sage Artemisia spp
Salt cedar Tamarix ramosissima
Sand dropseed Sporobolus cryptandrus
Shadscale Saltbush Atriplex confertifolia
Spiny hopsage Grayia spinosa
Western salsify Tragopogon dubius
Yucca Yucca glauca

3.3 Rare Plant Survey
A review of listed T&E and rare plants of Garfield County revealed that the Mill could potentially
harbor two federally listed threatened species and several rare plant species. Species are listed
as threatened or rare due to a number of factors including habitat loss, population declines,
limited distribution, or any combination of these factors. The Mill site was inspected for the
Jones Cycladenia (Cycladenia humilis var. jonesii) and the Wright Fishhook Cactus
(Sclerocactus wrightiae), both are federally listed threatened plant species found in parts of
Garfield County, Utah. Table 6 presents the threatened and rare species of Garfield County.

Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site Uranium One
Tetra Tech July 8, 2008 11
A survey for threatened and rare species revealed that none of the listed species in Table 6
occur within the boundaries of the Mill site.

Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site Uranium One
Tetra Tech July 8, 2008 12
Table 6. Federally Listed Threatened and Rare Species in Garfield County, Utah
Common Name Scientific Name
Federally Threatened Species
Jones Cycladenia Cycladenia humilis var. jonesii
Wright Fishhook Cactus Sclerocactus wrightiae
Garfield County Rare Species
Yellow columbine Aquilegia flavescens var. rubicunda
Divided rockcress Arabis schistacea
Welsh's aster Aster welshii
Bicknell's milkvetch Astragalus consobrinus
Dana milkvetch Astragalus henrimontanensis
Cicada milkvetch Astragalus laccoliticus
Monti's milkvetch Astragalus limnocharis var. tabulaeus
Monument milkvetch Astragalus monumentalis
Ferron's milkvetch Astragalus musiniensis
Rydberg's milkvetch Astragalus perianus
Silver's milkvetch Astragalus subcinereus var. basalticus
Loa milkvetch Astragalus welshii
Peculiar moonwort Botrychium paradoxum
Creeping rush-pea Caesalpinia repens
Aquarius Plateau Indian paintbrush Castilleja aquariensis
Indian paintbrush species Castilleja parvula var. parvula
Bryce Canyon Indian paintbrush Castilleja parvula var. revealii
Yellowwhite cryptantha Cryptantha ochroleuca
Osterhout's cryptanth Cryptantha osterhoutii
Jones' waxydogbane Cycladenia humilis var. jonesii
Cedar Breaks springparsley Cymopterus minimus
Hole-in-the-Rock prairie-clover Dalea flavescens var. epica
Stream orchid Epipactis gigantea
Kachina daisy Erigeron kachinensis
Maguire's fleabane Erigeron maguirei
Professor's fleabane Erigeron proselyticus
Red Canyon buckwheat Eriogonum aretioides
Bull Mountain buckwheat Eriogonum corymbosum var. cronquistii
Paria spurge Euphorbia nephradenia
Oil shale fescue Festuca dasyclada
Cataract gilia Gilia latifolia var. imperialis
Alcove bog-orchid Habenaria zothecina
Subalpine goldenbush Haplopappus zionis
Jones' false goldenaster Heterotheca jonesii
Mountain pepperweed Lepidium montanum var. claronense
Elizabeth's pepperweed Lepidium montanum var. neeseae
Paria River Indian breadroot Pediomelum pariense
Sandloving penstemon Penstemon ammophilus
Red Canyon beardtongue Penstemon bracteatus
Tushar Range beardtongue Penstemon caespitosus var. suffruticosus
Aquarius Plateau beardtongue Penstemon parvus
Alcove rock-daisy Perityle specuicola
Phacelia species Phacelia sabulonum
Kane County twinpod Physaria lepidota var. membranacea
Cinquefoil species Potentilla angelliae
Fall buttercup Ranunculus aestivalis
Podunk ragwort Senecio malmstenii
Plateau catchfly Silene petersonii
Rock tansy Sphaeromeria capitata
Ute lady's tresses Spiranthes diluvialis
Moab woodyaster Xylorhiza glabriuscula var. linearifolia
USDA-NRCS PLANTS Database, 2008; Utah Rare Plant Guide, 2003
Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site Uranium One
Tetra Tech July 8, 2008 13
3.4 Noxious Weed Survey
A noxious weed is defined as a plant in any living stage, such as seeds and reproductive parts,
of any parasitic or other plant of a kind, which is of foreign origin, is new to or not widely
prevalent in the United States, and can directly or indirectly injure crops, other useful plants,
livestock, or poultry or other interests of agriculture, including irrigation, or navigation, or the fish
or wildlife resources of the United States or the public health (USDA 1974). Table 7 gives a
complete list of Utah State listed noxious weeds.
Russian thistle (Salsola spp.) was found in various areas throughout the Mill site. Salt cedar
(Tamarix ramosissima) was found at the base of the north side of the dam (Photo 3). Both
Russian thistle and salt cedar are considered undesirable invasive species and are frequently
listed on state noxious weed lists. Undesirable plant species are plants that are noxious, exotic,
injurious, or poisonous, pursuant to State or Federal law. These two species are not considered
noxious weeds and their control is not required by law but there is a potential that these plants
could spread to other portions of the property, producing adverse effects on native plant
populations at the Mill site.

Table 7. Utah State Listed Noxious Weeds
Common Name Scientific Name
Bermudagrass Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.1
Canada thistle Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop.
Diffuse knapweed Centaurea diffusa Lam.
Dyers woad Isatis tinctoria L.
Field bindweed Convolvulus arvensis L.
Hardheads Acroptilon repens (L.) DC.
Hoary cress Cardaria draba (L.) Desv.
Johnsongrass Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.
Leafy spurge Euphorbia esula L.
Medusahead Taeniatherum caput-medusae (L.) Nevski
Musk thistle Carduus nutans L.
Perennial pepperweed Lepidium latifolium L.
Perennial sorghum Sorghum almum Parodi
Purple loosestrife Lythrum salicaria L.
Quackgrass Elymus repens (L.) Gould
Russian knapweed Centaurea repens L.
Scotch thistle Onopordum acanthium L.
Spotted knapweed Centaurea stoebe L. ssp. micranthos (Gugler) Hayek
Squarrose knapweed Centaurea virgata Lam. ssp. squarrosa (Willd.) Gugler
Yellow starthistle Centaurea solstitialis L.

Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site Uranium One
Tetra Tech July 8, 2008 14

Photo 3. Salt Cedar (Tamarix ramosissimaan) at Base of Dam

Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site Uranium One
Tetra Tech July 8, 2008 15
4.0 CONCLUSIONS
Baseline wildlife and vegetation surveys were conducted on June 4, 2008 at the Shootaring
Canyon Uranium Processing Facility in Garfield County, Utah in order to determine the extent of
wildlife use at the Mill site and characterize the vegetation. The Mill is scheduled to begin
operations in the near future after revisions to the Mill are complete.

A general wildlife inventory was taken throughout the day of the study. Little wildlife was present
at the time of survey. Five raptor and three owl species of concern had the potential to occupy
the Mill site (Table 2). No raptor species or signs of raptor presence (nests, feathers, and
pellets) were observed. Owl habitat was not present at the Mill site. These results suggest that
the Mill site does not currently maintain breeding sites for raptor or owl species. Three bat
species of concern had the potential to occupy the Mill site. It was concluded during the survey
that habitat for these species is not present. The Mill site contained species of local, common
birds including horned larks, sparrows, and ravens. The only mammals observed on the Mill site
were desert cottontail rabbits and Hopi chipmunks. Evidence of coyote presence was seen near
the dam.

The vegetation characterization did not find any special status flora in the survey areas. No rare
or threatened plant species were found. Although one patch of salt cedar, as well as populations
of Russian thistle, were found at the Mill site, no Utah State noxious weed species were
identified.

Baseline Wildlife and Vegetation Survey of the Shootaring Uranium Mill Site Uranium One
Tetra Tech July 8, 2008 16
5.0 REFERENCES

Lyntek, Inc., 2008. Definitive Cost Estimate for the Restart of the Shootaring Canyon Mill,
Ticaboo, Utah. March 28.

State of Utah Natural Resources Division of Wildlife Resources, “Utah Sensitive Species List”
August 2007. Internet, accessed May 2008.
http://dwrcdc.nr.utah.gov/ucdc/ViewReports/te_cnty.pdf

US Fish and Wildlife Service. 1999. “Utah Field Office Guidelines for Raptor Protection from
Human and Land Use Disturbances.” Utah Field Office, Salt Lake City, Utah.

US Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. “Mexican Spotted Owl Survey Protocol”. Albuquerque, New
Mexico.

US Fish and Wildlife Service “Federal and State Listed Species”. Internet, accessed May 2008.
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/wildlife.html

Utah Rare Plant Guide 2003. Internet, accessed May 2008.
http://www.utahrareplants.org/rpg_acknow.html

USDA. 1974. “Federal Noxious Weed Act”. Internet, accessed June 2008.
http://www.access.gpo.gov/uscode/title7/chapter61_.html

USDA, NRCS. 2008. The PLANTS Database. National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA
70874-4490 USA. Internet, accessed June 2008 http://plants.usda.gov

APPENDIX A
GARFIELD COUNTY SPECIES OF CONCERN

Garfield County Species of Concern
Common
Name
Scientific
Name
State
Status
Surveyed
Required?
Comments
Amphibians and Reptiles
Arizona Toad Bufo
microscaphus SPC No
This species inhabits streams, washes,
irrigated crop lands, reservoirs, and uplands
adjacent to water. A survey is not required
due to a lack of suitable habitat.
Common
Chuckwalla Sauromalus ater SPC No
Chuckwallas are predominantly found near
cliffs, boulders, or rocky slopes. They are
found near the Colorado River Basin in
Garfield County which is located 20 miles to
the south of the Mill site. A survey is not
required due to lack of habitat.
Desert Night
Lizard Xantusia vigilis SPC No
This species lives near Joshua trees and is
an insectivore. A survey is not required due
to lack of habitat.
Western Toad Bufo Boreas SPC
No
This species inhabits slow moving streams,
wetlands, desert springs, ponds, lakes,
meadows, and woodlands. A survey is not
required due to lack of habitat.
Avian
American White
Pelican
Pelecanus
erythrorhynchos SPC No
This species only breeds in the northern
portions of the state, specifically within the
Utah Lake/Great Salt Lake ecological
complex. It may migrate through Garfield
County stopping in the larger lakes. No
survey is required due to lack of habitat.
Bald Eagle
Haliaeetus
leucocephalus S-ESA Yes
Eagle habitat is generally near lakes and
rivers. Since they can fly great distances for
food and water they are included in the
survey.
Burrowing Owl
Athene
cunicularia SPC Yes
This owl's habitats are open grassland and
prairies. They are generally associated with
prairie dogs.
California
Condor
Gymnogyps
californianus S-ESA Yes
California condors prefer mountainous
country at low and moderate elevations,
especially rocky and brushy areas near
cliffs.
Ferruginous
Hawk Buteo regalis SPC Yes
These hawks are generally found flat and
rolling terrain in grassland or shrub steppe.
They prefer to nest high in trees or cliff
banks.
Greater Sage-
Grouse
Centrocercus
Urophasianus
SPC No This species inhabits sagebrush plains,
foothills, and mountain valleys and also
requires an understory of grasses and
forbs, and associated wet meadow areas. A
survey is not required due to a lack of
habitat.

Garfield County Species of Concern (continued)
Common
Name
Scientific
Name
State
Status
Surveyed
Required?
Comments
Avian (continued)
Lewis’s
Woodpecker Melanerpes lewis SPC No
This species prefers to build its nests in
ponderosa pine, cottonwood, or sycamore.
A survey is not required due to lack of
habitat.
Long-Billed
Curlew
Numenius
americanus SPC No
The curlew is rare but occasionally seen in
the Colorado River Basin, which is located
20 south of the project site. Due to lack of
habitat, no survey is required.
Northern
Goshawk Accipiter gentilis CS No
The northern goshawk prefers mature
mountain forest and riparian zone habitats.
Due to lack of habitat a survey is not
required.
Peregrine
Falcon Falco peregrinus SPC Yes
This falcon species is rare in the County
but is widely distributed throughout the
Country. It prefers to nest on tall cliffs.
Prairie Falcon Falco mexicanus SPC Yes
These birds are found in open habitats,
such as plains and prairies.
Short-eared Owl Asio flammeus SPC Yes
This species is most often found in open
habitats such as grasslands and
shrublands.
Southwestern
Willow
Flycatcher
Empidonax traillii
extimus S-ESA No
This passerine is found in riparian habitats,
especially in areas of dense willow. A
survey is not required due to a lack of
habitat.
Spotted Owl Strix occidentalis S-ESA Yes
This owl species can be found in steep
rocky canyons as well as various forest
types.
Three-toed
Woodpecker
Picoides
tridactylus SPC No
This species occupies areas of coniferous
forests, generally above 8,000 ft elevation.
A survey is not required due to a lack of
habitat.
Yellow-billed
Cuckoo
Coccyzus
americanus S-ESA No
Cuckoos require lowland riparian habitat. A
survey is not required due to a lack of
habitat.
Bluehead
Sucker
Catastomus
discobolus
CS No This species is found in river systems. The
nearest river is located 20 miles south of
the project site. A survey is not required
due to lack of habitat.
Bonneville
Cutthroat Trout
Oncorhynchus
clarkii utah
CS No This species is found in permanent lakes
and rivers. The nearest permanent water
source is located 20 miles south of the
project site. A survey is not required due to
lack of habitat.
Bonytail Gila elegans S-ESA No This species is found in the Colorado River
located 20 miles south of the project site. A
survey is not required due to lack of habitat.

Garfield County Species of Concern (continued)
Common
Name
Scientific
Name
State
Status
Surveyed
Required?
Comments
Fishes
Colorado Pike
Minnow
Ptychocheilus
lucius S-ESA No
This species is found in the Colorado River
located 20 miles south of the project site. A
survey is not required due to lack of habitat.
Colorado River
Cutthroat Trout
Oncorhynchus
clarkii pleuriticus CS No
This species is found in the Colorado River
located 20 miles south of the project site. A
survey is not required due to lack of habitat.
Flannelmouth
Sucker
Catostomus
latipinnis CS No
This species is found in the Colorado River
and in its larger tributaries. The nearest
river is located 20 miles south of the project
site. A survey is not required due to lack of
habitat.
Humpback
Chub Gila cypha S-ESA No
This species is found in the Colorado River
located 20 miles south of the project site. A
survey is not required due to lack of habitat.
Leatherside
Chub Gila copei SPC No
This species is native to streams and rivers
of the southeastern portion of the
Bonneville Basin located on the far Western
edge of Garfield County about 200 miles
from the project site.
Roundtail Chub Gila robusta CS No
This species is found in the Colorado River
located 20 miles south of the project site. A
survey is not required due to lack of habitat.
Mammals
Allen’s Big-
eared Bat
Idionycteris
phyllotis SPC No
This bat is found in rocky and riparian areas
in woodland and scrubland regions. No
survey is required due to lack of habitat.
Big Free-tailed
Bat
Nyctinomops
macrotis SPC Yes
The big free-tailed bat prefers rocky and
woodland habitats, where roosting occurs in
caves, mines, old buildings, and rock
crevices.
Brown (Grizzly)
Bear Ursus arctos S-ESA No Extirpated from Utah, no survey is required.
Fringed Myotis
Myotis
thysanodes SPC Yes
Aside from caves, this bat can be found in
mines and buildings in desert and woodland
areas.
Henry Mountain
Bison Herd Bos bison SPC No
Bison prefer plains, grassland, and open
woodland habitats with plenty of grasses
and some riparian habitat. Due to a lack of
habitat, a survey is not required.

Garfield County Species of Concern (continued)
Common
Name
Scientific
Name
State
Status
Surveyed
Required?
Comments
Mammals (continued)
Kit Fox Vulpes macrotis SPC No
This species is found in desert
landscape, but is currently only known
in the western most part of Garfield
County, so no survey is required.
Mule Deer
Odocoileus
hemiounus SPC No
The mule deer occupy open range
areas, grasses and some riparian
habitat. No survey is required due to
lack of habitat.
Pygmy Rabbit
Brachylagus
idahoensis SPC No
This small rabbit prefers areas with tall
dense sagebrush and loose soils. It is
not known to occur in Eastern Garfield
County, so no survey is required.
Spotted Bat
Euderma
maculatum SPC Yes
These bats are found in a variety of
habitats, ranging from deserts to
forested mountains; they roost and
hibernate in caves and rock crevices.
Western Red
Bat
Lasiurus
blossevillii SPC No
Western red bats are normally found
near water, often in wooded areas.
The species is nocturnal; daytime
roosting usually occurs in trees. Due to
lack of habitat, not included in survey.
Townsend’s
Big-eared Bat
Corynorhinus
townsendii SPC Yes
These bats are most often found near
forested areas but may use mines for
day roosting.
Utah Prairie
Dog
Cynomys
parvidens S-ESA No
This prairie dog is very rare and
generally only occurs in the
southwestern portion of Utah. No
survey is required due to lack of
habitat.
S-ESA Federally-listed or candidate species under the Endangered Species Act.
SPC Wildlife species of concern.
CS Species receiving special management under a Conservation Agreement in order to preclude the need
for Federal listing.

Office Address:
10808 S. River Front Parkway
Suite 321
South Jordan, Utah 84095

Office: 385.246.1250
Fax: [phone]
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
AR
HC
February 23, 2024

Mr. Doug Hansen, Director
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control
195 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84116
Re: Radioactive Materials License UT0900480 and Ground Water Discharge Permit UGW170003; Annual
Groundwater Monitoring Report 2023.

Dear Director Hansen:

As required by Radioactive Materials License UT0900480 conditions 11.2, 11.3 and 12.2 and Ground
Water Discharge Permit No. UGW170003, Anfield Resources Holding Corp. (Anfield) submits two copies
of the Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Annual Ground Water Monitoring Report – 2023. This report
covers the monitoring period of January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023. This submittal includes the detailed
quality assurance evaluation of the field and laboratory data.

Anfield believes that this report, in association with the proposed corrective actions, meet the requirements
of Radioactive Materials License UT0900480, Ground Water Discharge Permit No. UGW170003 and the
approved Quality Assurance Plan.

I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direct
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and
evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the persons who manage the system, or those
persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.

Should you have any questions in regard to this matter, please contact Corey Dias at [phone] or e-
mail at [e-mail].

Sincerely,

Joshua Bleak
Director
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility

cc: Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility file

ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
AR
HC

SHOOTARING CANYON
URANIUM FACILITY
ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING
REPORT
2023

Radioactive Materials License #UT0900480
Groundwater Discharge Permit # UGW170003

FEBRUARY 2024

Submitted by

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
10808 S. River Front Parkway, Suite 321
South Jordan, UT 84095

ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
AR
HC

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility i Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report - 2023
February 2024
TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 TECHNICAL SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 1
1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1
1.2 Site and Well Locations ......................................................................................... 1
2.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM ................................................................. 3
3.0 GEOLOGIC AND TAILING CONDITIONS AND WELL COMPLETIONS ........................ 4
3.1 Geologic Setting .................................................................................................... 4
3.2 Well Completions .................................................................................................. 4
3.3 Tailings Conditions ................................................................................................ 5
4.0 GROUNDWATER FLOW ................................................................................................. 6
4.1 Entrada Sandstone Aquifer ................................................................................... 6
4.2 Perched Groundwater Zone .................................................................................. 6
4.3 Calculated Vertical Gradient .................................................................................. 7
5.0 GROUNDWATER QUALITY ............................................................................................ 9
5.1 Sampling Summary ............................................................................................... 9
5.2 Summary of Results ............................................................................................ 10
5.3 Quality Assurance & Quality Control ................................................................... 12
5.4 Field Data ............................................................................................................ 13
5.4.1 Sampling Preparation ....................................................................................................... 13
5.4.2 Daily Meter Calibration ................................................................................................... 13
5.4.3 Groundwater Level Measurement ..................................................................................... 13
5.4.4 Calculation of Well Casing Volumes ................................................................................ 13
5.4.5 Pumping Rate Determination ........................................................................................... 13
5.4.6 Meter Function Checks ..................................................................................................... 13
5.4.7 Pre-Sampling Well Purging & Field Parameter Stabilization ......................................... 14
5.4.8 Well Sampling ................................................................................................................... 14
5.5 Laboratory Data Reduction, Validation and Reporting ........................................ 14
5.5.1 Holding Time .................................................................................................................... 14
5.5.2 Chain of Custody Forms ................................................................................................... 14
5.5.3 Analytes, Methods and Reporting Limits .......................................................................... 14
5.5.4 Analytical Accuracy .......................................................................................................... 14
5.5.5 Lab Control Samples ......................................................................................................... 15
5.5.6 Matrix Spike and Matrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries ...................................................... 15
5.5.7 Analytical Precision .......................................................................................................... 15
5.6 Internal QA Review & Reporting ......................................................................... 15
6.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION ................................................................................................ 16
7.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 17

ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
AR
HC

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility ii Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report - 2023
February 2024
LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1-1 Location of the Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Figure 1-2 Location of Wells and Geologic Cross Sections
Figure 3-1 Geologic Cross Section 1-1’
Figure 3-2 Geologic Cross Section 2-2’
Figure 3-3 Geologic Cross Section 3-3’
Figure 3-4 Time Series of Measured Groundwater Elevations
Figure 3-5 Water-Level Elevation in the Perched Water Zone and Entrada Aquifer, November 2023
Figure 3-6 Location of Tailings Wells and Underdrain Piping and Sump
Figure 3-7 Location of Drainage Area and Existing Tailings Cell
Figure 4-1 Water Levels and Calculated Vertical Gradient Between Wells RM8 and RM20
Figure 5-1 Concentrations of TDS, Sulfate, Chloride and Field pH in the Entrada Aquifer and
Perched Water Zone, November 2023
Figure 5-2 Concentrations of Trace Metals Arsenic, Barium, Chromium and Selenium in the Entrada
Aquifer and Perched Water Zone, November 2023

LIST OF TABLES

Table 2-1 Summary of Monitoring Wells and Background Data Collection
Table 2-2 Groundwater Discharge Monitoring Parameters and State Standards
Table 3-1 Water Level Elevations
Table 3-2 Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Well and Piezometer Data
Table 4-1 Calculated Vertical Gradients Between Wells RM8 and RM20

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment A Documentation of Communication with Laboratory
Attachment B Field Sampling Data Forms
Attachment C Laboratory Data Reports
Attachment D Water Quality Data Tables and Graphs
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
AR
HC
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility 1 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report - 2023
February 2024
1.0 TECHNICAL SUMMARY
1.1 Introduction
This report presents the groundwater monitoring results for the Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
(Facility) for the year 2023. This submittal is intended to fulfill the requirements of Groundwater Discharge
Permit UGW170003 (Permit) Section 1.G.1 and 1.G.2. By agreement with the Utah Department of
Environmental Quality, the groundwater quality monitoring data required by Radioactive Materials License
UT 0900480 (License) for the Second Half 2023 Effluent Monitoring Report have been included in this
document to eliminate redundancy of data reporting. The current licensee is Anfield Resources Holding
Corporation (Anfield).

Groundwater monitoring at the Facility is currently focused on collection of baseline data to develop intra-
well statistics for development of long-term site-specific compliance water quality criteria. An application
for an amendment to the License and, concurrently, a revision to the Groundwater Discharge Permit
(GWDP), has been submitted to License resumption of full operational status for the mill, which includes
construction and operation of a new tailings disposal facility that meets Best Available Technology
requirements. This License amendment and Permit revision process is on-going and, as confirmed by a
letter from the Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ), Division of Radiation Control (now
the Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control [DWMRC]) dated January 14, 2009, the Ground
Water Discharge Permit is currently administratively extended and active pending completion of the
ongoing application process or notification otherwise by the Executive Secretary.

On May 31, 2013, Uranium One Americas, Inc. (Uranium One) submitted a renewal application for
Groundwater Discharge Permit UGW 170003. This renewal application contained the Shootaring Canyon
Uranium Facility Background Groundwater Quality Report including statistical analyses of the
groundwater quality data. In December 2013, Uranium One received comments from UDEQ/DWMRC on
the documents submitted as part of the renewal application for the GWDP. Following a conference call in
January 2014, the UDEQ/DWMRC requested that Uranium One provide additional information on the
manner in which statistical analysis was conducted. Uranium One submitted an amended Shootaring
Canyon Mill Background Groundwater Quality Report. On January 29, 2016, the Director of the DWMRC
approved the transfer of control of the Facility from Uranium One Americas, Inc. to Anfield. Transfer of
control of the Facility also included changing the name of the License and the Permit to Anfield. On June
29, 2016, Anfield submitted a renewal of the License to the UDEQ/DWMRC. Anfield reformatted that
submittal and submitted the revised document to UDEQ/DWMRC in September 2018. After two phone
calls with the UDEQ/DWMRC in 2017 and 2018, Anfield completed a modified statistical analysis as
directed by UDEQ/DWMRC and submitted the revised Shootaring Canyon Mill Background Groundwater
Quality Report in August 2018. In July 2019, Anfield identified a typographical error in one of the tables
of the Shootaring Canyon Mill Background Groundwater Quality Report and submitted a replacement page
to UDEQ/DWMRC.

1.2 Site and Well Locations
Figure 1-1 presents the location of the Facility within the State of Utah. This figure shows the location of
Lake Powell, Bullfrog and Ticaboo with respect to the Facility. Figure 1-2 presents mapping of the
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility, which is located 2.5 miles north of Ticaboo, Utah. The Bullfrog
Marina is located 14 miles south of this site, while Hanksville, Utah is located 56 miles by road north of
the Facility. Figure 1-2 shows the location of the Facility Tailings Dam, the cross valley berm, and the
locations of existing and historical monitoring wells at the Facility.

ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
AR
HC
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility 2 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report - 2023
February 2024
The climate is semi-arid in the vicinity of the Facility with an average elevation of approximately 4,500
feet and rocky terrain. Winds are normally light to moderate and average annual precipitation is estimated
to be between five and seven inches at the Facility.
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
AR
HC
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility 3 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report - 2023
February 2024
2.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM
Groundwater monitoring at the Facility is conducted in compliance with the Utah DEQ Groundwater
Quality Discharge Permit (Permit) UGW170003 as well as the License. The required monitoring wells are
identified in Permit Section I.E.1.b. Table 2-1 presents pertinent data relative to well sampling and lists the
wells that were included in the 2023 monitoring as well as historical wells and piezometers either abandoned
or not currently within the required monitoring program. This table also indicates the type of data collected
for each well, whether it is groundwater-level measurement and/or groundwater-quality sampling. Figure
1-2 shows the locations of the wells in the perched groundwater zone, the Entrada aquifer wells, and wells
abandoned in 2003.

The groundwater monitoring program is currently focused on collection of baseline data from the
uppermost aquifer to develop intra-well statistics for development of long-term compliance water quality
criteria as per Permit Section I.E.1.d.ii.A. The background monitoring program was adjusted in 2004 with
concurrence by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the State of Utah due to the abandonment
of wells near the Facility Dam and the addition of the new wells near the cross valley berm. The results of
the background monitoring program and proposed site groundwater protection limits are under review as
part of the Groundwater Discharge Permit renewal.

Table 2-2 presents the water quality parameters required by Permit Condition I.C, Table 1 and included in
the approved Groundwater Quality Assurance Plan (QAP) Table 3. This table also provides the
corresponding Utah Groundwater Quality Standards (GWQS) as stated in Utah Administrative Code R317-
6-2. During the accelerated background groundwater monitoring program, the Utah GWQS are the
applicable groundwater protection standards.

The parameter gross alpha (adjusted, minus radon and uranium), which is not identified in Permit Table 1,
was added after consultation with DWMRC to ensure that baseline data for this parameter were collected
to develop groundwater quality statistics in compliance with Permit Section I.C, Table 2. Groundwater
quality samples are collected voluntarily from RM8 and RM20 although groundwater level measurements
are the only required sampling parameters for these wells.

ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
AR
HC
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility 4 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report - 2023
February 2024
3.0 GEOLOGIC AND TAILING CONDITIONS AND WELL COMPLETIONS
3.1 Geologic Setting
The geologic setting of the Facility was presented in Hydro-Engineering, LLC (1998). The hydrogeologic
cross sections from the Hydro-Engineering report were developed with the aid of neutron borehole
geophysical logs, which are reproduced in this Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report. Figure 1-2 presents
the locations of these cross sections. The neutron logs are printed with two different scales to better illustrate
the variations below the groundwater table. The two scales for Wells RM6 and RM12 are slightly different
than those for the remainder of the logs. Some lower permeability sandstone lenses were interpreted from
the neutron logs and are shown with a magenta cross hatch pattern on the three cross sections (Figure 3-1
through Figure 3-3). The well completion intervals were added to the cross sections with a short black
horizontal line pattern in the slotted interval of the casing or in the open hole.

Figure 3-1 shows the geologic cross section 1-1’ which roughly follows the base of the main tailings dam
from west to east. Wells RM11 and RM13 on Figure 3-1 were deepened after the 1998 report. Their original
depths are shown on the cross section along with their present total depth. Figure 3-2 shows the geologic
cross section 2-2’ which runs north from the southwest corner of the tailings facility up to the cross valley
berm at well RM14 and then east across the toe of the cross valley berm to wells RM2 and RM2R. Figure
3-3 presents the geologic cross section 3-3’, which runs from the Facility Dam through the cross valley
berm to the two up-gradient wells RM1 and RM12.

Locally, thin layers of surface alluvial material, windblown sands and fluvial sands and gravels, cover the
Entrada Sandstone. It should be noted that this alluvial material contains clasts of the Salt Wash member
of the Morrison Formation, which is the uranium bearing strata in the area. The Entrada Sandstone, a
member of the San Rafael Group, is regionally extensive and is a relatively uniform fine grained sandstone
with some thin layers of shale and siltstone that ranges from 400 feet to 500 feet in thickness in the Tailings
Storage Facility area. The uppermost aquifer in the project area is unconfined and hosted by the Entrada
Sandstone.

The Entrada Sandstone is underlain by the Carmel Formation, which consists of shale and siltstone beds, is
approximately 160 feet thick in the Facility area and acts as a regional aquitard. The Navajo Sandstone
underlies the Carmel Formation and is approximately 800 feet thick in the project area. The groundwater
in the underlying Navajo Sandstone aquifer exhibits a difference in potentiometric head of more than 200
feet relative to the Entrada Sandstone aquifer, which is indicative of the effectiveness of the Carmel aquitard
(Hydro-Engineering, 1998).

3.2 Well Completions
Table 3-2 presents a basic well data table for Facility wells. No new wells have been added since installation
of five wells in 2003 (RM18, RM19, RM20, RM21, and RM22). The three tailings piezometers (T-4, T-5,
and T-6) installed in 2002 have remained dry except for limited temporary saturation during higher
precipitation periods in 2005 and 2006. Sixteen of the Facility monitoring wells were abandoned in late
2003 in preparation for removal of Facility Dam.

Wells RM1, RM2, RM2R, RM3, RM4, RM5, RM6, RM7 through RM20, OW1A, and OW2 are completed
in the Entrada aquifer. Wells RM8, RM9, RM21 and RM22 were completed at shallow depths in the Entrada
Sandstone in an attempt to characterize a localized perched groundwater zone. Only RM8 and RM9
encountered saturated conditions. RM21 and RM22 (which are located directly adjacent to wells RM18
and RM19, respectively) did not intersect a low permeability zone or perched groundwater condition and
remain dry.
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
AR
HC
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility 5 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report - 2023
February 2024

Wells WW1, WW2, OW1B and OW3 are completed in the Navajo aquifer while OW4 is completed across
the Carmel aquitard and Entrada Sandstone contact. PZ1 through PZ3 are Facility Dam piezometers while
T4 through T6 are completed in the tailings. Wells T4 through T6 in the tailings have remained dry except
during 2005 and 2006 when approximately one foot of water was measured in the bottom of T4. These
data demonstrate the drained nature of the existing tailings.

Wells RM8 and RM20 are used to evaluate the vertical gradient between the perched groundwater zone
(RM8) and the Entrada aquifer (RM20) as per Section I.E.1.d.i of the Groundwater Discharge Permit.
Figure 1-2 shows the locations of the monitoring and abandoned wells at the Facility. Figure 3-4 presents
the measured groundwater level elevations for the current monitoring program wells through time. Figure
3-5 shows the uniformity of the gradient in the current piezometric surface for the Entrada aquifer under
the tailings area.

3.3 Tailings Conditions
Approximately 25,000 cubic yards (cy) of tailings are currently present at the site and were developed
during the three-month test startup of the mill in 1984. The existing tailings disposal facility also contains
approximately 12,600 cy of 11.e.(2) Byproduct Material from the cleanup of the Hanksville ore buying
station and the Hydro-Jet Plant (Hydro-Engineering, 2005). These materials are currently located on the
tailings disposal facility clay liner and covered with an interim cover of native soils to control and stabilize
the tailings and to limit the amount of radon flux to no more than 20 pCi/m2-sec. The current tailings
conditions are presented in the Tailings Reclamation Plan (Hydro-Engineering and ERG, 2005). Figure 3-
3, which presents the geologic cross section 3-3’, shows the present land surface and associated features in
the area of the existing tailings. The clay liner, which is two feet thick, was placed in the tailings cell area
prior to the deposition of tailings. Figure 1-2 shows the limits of the existing tailings.

A perforated underdrain pipe system bedded in a sandy material was installed on top of the clay liner. The
underdrain system is connected to a drain sump on the downstream side of the cross valley berm. Figure 3-
6 shows the location of the underdrain pipes, sump and lined evaporation pond and the location of three
tailings wells (T4, T5, and T6) that were installed in 2002. Water that infiltrates in this area enters the
perforated pipes and drains to the sump. Water from the sump is pumped back to the tailings disposal cell
into a high-density polyethylene (HDPE) lined evaporation pond located on top of the existing clay liner.
Figure 3-7 shows the location of the entire drainage area to the cross valley berm.

Although not required by the permit, water quality samples from the tailings sump were collected quarterly
prior to 2009, no tailings sump samples were collected between 2008 and 2018. The tailings sump was
most recently sampled in November 2023. Concentrations of total dissolved solids (TDS), bicarbonate,
calcium, chloride, fluoride, nitrate+nitrite, magnesium, molybdenum, gross alpha, selenium, sodium,
uranium and sulfate are elevated in the tailings sump water samples with respect to the uppermost aquifer.

The gross alpha activity was 2,780 pCi/L and TDS was reported as 40,000 mg/L. Gross alpha results on
high TDS, greater than 500 mg/L, samples are not reliable. The high TDS concentration requires a low
sample volume for the method. This low sample volume and high TDS can produce elevated results that
if all the alpha emitters for the sample were added together would cause the results to be out of
balance. Gross alpha was developed for screening of low TDS (less than 500 mg/L) drinking water
samples.

Groundwater monitoring of the downgradient wells, RM7, RM18 and RM19, indicates that the high TDS
water has not affected the groundwater system at the Facility. Therefore, the clay liner has been effective
in containing the underdrain water and preventing it from entering the Entrada aquifer.
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
AR
HC
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility 6 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report - 2023
February 2024
4.0 GROUNDWATER FLOW
4.1 Entrada Sandstone Aquifer
Groundwater in the uppermost aquifer at the Facility is in the Entrada Sandstone and is first encountered at
depths ranging from approximately 150 to 200 feet below ground surface. The uppermost aquifer is
unconfined in the Facility. Table 3-1 presents the measured depth to groundwater and calculated
groundwater elevation. Figure 3-5 shows the November 2023 groundwater elevation data and indicates
that the groundwater flow in the Facility tailings area is from north to south, from the upper reaches of the
tailings basin to downstream of the Facility Dam. The groundwater table contours reflect interpretations
based on current groundwater levels in existing wells and interpretation and extrapolation from historical
groundwater levels from abandoned wells. The groundwater gradient between RM1 and RM20 as
measured in 2023 remains approximately 0.01 ft/ft, essentially unchanged over the last ten years. Based on
this gradient, the average measured horizontal hydraulic conductivity of 0.2 ft/day (Hydro-Engineering,
1998) and a reasonable effective porosity value for sandstone of 0.1, groundwater in the Entrada aquifer is
calculated to be moving at a velocity of approximately seven feet per year.

Figure 3-4 presents measured groundwater level elevations for the current monitoring program wells. As
the overall groundwater levels in existing and historical wells have been relatively stable, there is no
evidence of any significant changes to the overall Facility groundwater flow patterns during this reporting
period. The Entrada aquifer groundwater elevations on Figure 3-5 are presented in blue with blue contours
corresponding to these groundwater levels. The groundwater levels from the perched groundwater zone are
presented in red and were drawn on Figure 3-5 to illustrate the area where the lower permeability zone
creates the perched groundwater condition. In the southern area of the Facility where the wells around the
dam are abandoned, the piezometric surface of the main Entrada aquifer is based on groundwater-level
measurements taken before the wells in that area were abandoned and have been reproduced from previous
reports.

4.2 Perched Groundwater Zone
A localized portion of the Entrada Sandstone with saturated conditions above the uppermost aquifer has
been identified in RM8 and was historically evident in the abandoned well RM9. Wells RM21 and RM22
were installed in an attempt to identify this perched groundwater zone near the toe of the cross valley berm
at the existing tailings disposal facility but no shallow saturated conditions were encountered. This
localized perched groundwater zone has groundwater levels approximately 60 feet to 70 feet above the
groundwater levels of the uppermost aquifer observed in all the other Facility wells (e.g., RM7 and RM20).
This localized perched groundwater condition is caused by a lower hydraulic conductivity (permeability)
zone in this portion of the Entrada Sandstone. This lower permeability zone (previously referred to as the
Upper Entrada), which decreases the infiltration rate of groundwater, has caused a zone of perched
groundwater in a limited area between the Facility Dam and the cross valley berm. The perched
groundwater condition is localized and is not contiguous with the main Entrada aquifer.

The lateral extent of this low permeability zone that creates the perched groundwater condition above the
uppermost aquifer is limited to within the area between the Facility Dam to the south, the cross valley berm
to the north, the mesa cliffs to the west and the sandstone terrace upon which the mill is located to the east.
This is based on interpretation of neutron borehole geophysical logs and monitoring well groundwater level
data.

ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
AR
HC
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility 7 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report - 2023
February 2024
Specifically, the shallow low permeability zone and perched groundwater condition identified in locations
RM8 and RM9 are not present in the following locations.

• On the Western margins of the tailings impoundment area:
o RM3 and RM14 as shown in Figure 3-2.
o RM11 as shown in Figure 3-1.
• To the North along the Cross Valley Berm:
o RM14, RM19, RM7, RM18 and RM2 as shown on Figure 3-2.
• On the Eastern margins of the tailings impoundment area:
o RM13 as shown in Figure 3-1.
o RM2 as shown in Figure 3-2.
• At or below the Facility Dam:
o RM11, RM15, and RM6 as shown on Figure 3-1.

Where the shallow, low permeability zone is identified in RM4 and RM5 near the Facility Dam (Figure 3-
1), it is not saturated. The dip of this localized shallow low permeability zone is to the north with the top
elevation approximately 4,380 feet above mean sea level (amsl) near the Facility Dam (RM4 and RM5 in
Figure 3-1) and approximately 4,290 feet amsl in RM8 and RM9 (Figure 3-3). It should also be noted that
the extension of the low permeability zone identified in RM4 and RM5 near the Facility Dam is very near
the pre-construction ground surface while the Entrada aquifer groundwater table surface is more than 100
feet below the ground surface. Based on these data, the perched groundwater zone is very limited in lateral
extent and is hydrologically separated from the main Entrada aquifer.

Groundwater in the perched zone is believed to flow off the north, west and east margins of the low
permeability zone into unsaturated sandstone as well as slowly infiltrate vertically through the lower
permeability sandstone unit creating the perched condition. The groundwater from the perched zone
percolates slowly down to the underlying main Entrada aquifer. As illustrated in Figure 3-5, there is no
evidence of distortion of the main Entrada Aquifer groundwater table in the area of the perched zone,
indicating that the rate and volume of vertically percolating groundwater from the perched zone is relatively
small.

4.3 Calculated Vertical Gradient
The Groundwater Discharge Permit Section 1.E.1.d.i requires that groundwater level measurements for all
nested well pairs will be used to define the vertical gradient. The Groundwater Discharge Permit Section
1.G.1.b.6 requires that the vertical hydraulic gradient will be reported as determined from nested well pair
RM8 and RM20. Table 4-1 summarizes the calculated vertical gradient based on the groundwater level
measurements between wells RM8 and RM20. These data are also presented in Figure 4-1.

The vertical separation between the mid-point of the two well screen zones (67 ft. to 171 ft.) is 104 feet
which yields a calculated average vertical gradient for 2023 of 0.749 ft/ft. Between 2016 and 2023, the
calculated vertical gradient has fluctuated between 0.748 and 0.759 ft/ft (Figure 4-1). This is believed to
reflect natural minor fluctuations in the uppermost aquifer groundwater table. Similar minor decreases in
groundwater levels have been observed over the same period in the upgradient background well RM1 and
upgradient well RM19 (see Table 3-1 and Figure 3-5). It should be noted that saturated conditions do not
exist between RM8 and RM20 (see geophysical log for RM20 in Figure 3-3).

Groundwater elevations for 1998 through 2023 for the Entrada aquifer and perched groundwater zone wells
are presented in Table 3-1. Figure 3-4 presents the groundwater levels with time for the Entrada wells and
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
AR
HC
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility 8 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report - 2023
February 2024
the perched groundwater zone well RM8. This figure shows that the groundwater elevations in each of the
Entrada wells have been relatively stable over the last nine years.

The head difference between the Entrada aquifer and the Carmel aquitard as observed in OW2 and OW4
was not measured. However, historical measurements consistently indicted essentially no vertical gradient
between the Carmel aquitard and Entrada sandstone, though this may be due to well OW4 being screened
across the Carmel/Entrada Contact. The head in the Navajo aquifer (OW3 and WW2), which is below the
Carmel, historically has been approximately 170 feet lower than the head in the Entrada aquifer which
indicates that the overall gradient is from the Entrada to the Navajo and there is little or no local hydraulic
communication between the aquifers.

ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
AR
HC
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility 9 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report - 2023
February 2024
5.0 GROUNDWATER QUALITY
5.1 Sampling Summary
First quarter 2023 sampling was performed on March 10 and 11, 2023; the sampling personnel consisted
of Mr. Brock Morrill, Mr. Chris Morrill, Ms. Marina Pei and Ms. LaMiya Morrill. Second quarter 2023
sampling was performed on April 22 and 24, 2023; the second quarter sampling personnel consisted of Ms.
Wendy Morrill, Mr. Brock Morrill, and Ms. LaMiya Morrill. Second quarter sampling of RM7 and RM19
was conducted with Mr. Dean Henderson and Chris Leahy of UDWMRC. Third Quarter 2023 sampling
was performed on July 15 and 16, 2023 by Mr. Brock Morrill, Ms. Wendy Morrill and Ms. LaMiya Morrill.
Fourth Quarter 2023 sampling was performed on November 5 and 6, by Mr. Chris Morrill and Ms. LaMiya
Morrill.

Quality assurance related communication with the primary laboratory during 2023 is provided in
Attachment A. Attachment B of this report contains field sampling data forms. Attachment C of this report
contains laboratory reports with QA review checklists all four quarters of 2023. Attachment D contains
tabulation and graphical figures of the groundwater elevation and groundwater quality data. Included with
this report are electronic files of a pdf of the submittal and spreadsheets containing groundwater quality and
groundwater level data for the 2023 monitoring at the Facility as required by Section I.G.1.b.7 of the Permit.

As per Section I.E.1.b.ii of the Groundwater Discharge Permit, samples were collected from RM1, RM2R,
RM7, RM12, RM14, RM18, and RM19 for all sampling periods including a single blind field duplicate
sample for each sampling event. As per Section I.E.1.b.i of the Groundwater Discharge Permit,
groundwater levels were measured for all of the above wells and RM8 and RM20. Although not required
by the permit, Anfield has elected to collect groundwater quality samples for RM8 and RM20; those data
are included in this report.

All samples were sent to Pace Analytical (PACE) in Sheridan, Wyoming for analysis. PACE performs
analytical services according to methods set forth by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), Standard methods for the examination of
groundwater and wastewater, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), and various
other Federal and State agencies. The laboratory maintains all required certifications including certification
with the State of Utah and National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Council (NELAC). These
certifications were current during the monitoring and analysis period.

The laboratory reports include analytical and quality control results and, where appropriate, a description
in the case narrative regarding analytical methods and quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) issues,
holding time information, and pertinent observations. The QA/QC Summary reports provided with each
laboratory analytical report were reviewed to confirm that all laboratory QA/QC requirements were met.

Laboratory analytical reports for each sampling event are associated with a laboratory work order number.
As described in the approved Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP) Section 3.3.10, one
blind duplicate was collected during each sampling event. The laboratory work order, blind duplicates, and
their association to a primary sample are summarized as follows:

Quarter 1 March 10 and 11, 2023 Sampling
• Work Order S2303166 (dated 5/25/2023)
o RM100 was the field duplicate sample to RM18

Quarter 2 April 22 and 24, 2023 Sampling
• Work Order # S2304349 (dated 5/30/2023)
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
AR
HC
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility 10 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report - 2023
February 2024
o RM100 was the field duplicate sample to RM1

Quarter 3 July 14 and 15, 2023 Sampling
• Work Order S2307223 (dated 08/18/2023)
o RM100 was the field duplicate sample to RM1
o RM7 and RM19 were split with UDEQ/DWMRC

Quarter 4 November 5 and 6, 2023 Sampling
• Work Order S2311115 (dated 1/29/2024)
o RM100 was the field duplicate sample to RM19

5.2 Summary of Results
The monitoring program continues to report results for the Permit Table 2 constituent adjusted gross alpha
(minus radon and uranium) to have baseline data to support development of future intra-well compliance
values for this parameter. The lateral variations of eight key parameters (arsenic, barium, chromium,
selenium, total dissolved solids, sulfate, chloride and field pH values) are presented on Figures 5-1 and 5-
2 to aid in evaluating present concentrations at the Facility. Figure 3-5 shows the November 2023
groundwater elevation data. The localized perched groundwater zone wells are shown with their names
labeled in red, while the Entrada aquifer wells are labeled in blue.

In addition, time series plots have been developed for all permit required constituents (Attachment D). The
historical data in Attachment D are useful in evaluating long-term groundwater quality patterns, and
previous annual reports should be used to view plots of data prior to 1998.

The groundwater quality of the uppermost aquifer (Entrada) is very good with generally low total dissolved
solids concentrations, typically less than 300 mg/L, and low dissolved metals and radionuclide
concentrations. This discussion addresses only anomalies to the otherwise stable groundwater quality
characteristics observed in the groundwater monitoring program. Constituents not discussed remain below
Utah GWQS and exhibit no significant changes for this reporting period.

All wells continued to have stable and relatively uniform concentrations or concentration not reported above
the reporting limit for ammonia, cadmium, chromium, copper, mercury, molybdenum, silver, and lead.
Radium-226 concentrations in all wells is variable. Only RM8, RM12, RM2R and RM20 appear to exhibit
any differences from the general pattern of stable and relatively uniform groundwater concentrations.

Well RM8
Groundwater quality data and graphs of data trends for RM8 are presented in Attachment D. Well RM8 is
located downgradient of the tailings cell and monitors a perched groundwater zone, a laterally limited zone
of lower permeability Entrada Sandstone with saturated conditions approximately 78 feet above the
groundwater table of the Entrada aquifer. This well has historically exhibited markedly different
groundwater quality characteristics than the wells of the Entrada aquifer. Well RM8 typically has
concentrations of several constituents greater than most other Facility wells.

Arsenic concentrations are elevated relative to arsenic concentrations in wells completed in the Entrada
aquifer.

Calcium concentrations, which were below the other Entrada aquifer wells before 2009, increased between
April 2009 and July 2012. Since July 2012 calcium concentrations have fluctuated but remain above pre-
2009 values. The reason for the increasing concentration trend is not known but may relate to re-dissolution
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
AR
HC
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility 11 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report - 2023
February 2024
of salts or carbonates in the capillary fringe of this perched groundwater zone associated with the slight
rising groundwater level trends.

Chloride concentrations, which were consistent with other Entrada aquifer wells prior to 2005, have
fluctuated between 20 mg/L and 60 mg/L since July 2011 and remain elevated above concentrations in the
Entrada aquifer. Chloride concentrations have generally increased since the fourth quarter of 2018. The
increase in chloride concentrations occurs with increase in groundwater elevation at RM8 since 2011.

Calculated adjusted gross alpha was reported as 10.3 pCi/L in the fourth quarter of 2023 which was elevated
above the previous three quarters in RM8. The TDS concentrations were a historic high of 590 mg/L.
Gross alpha results on high TDS, greater than 500 mg/L, samples are not considered reliable. Samples with
TDS concentrations above 500 mg/L require a low sample volume for the method. This low sample volume
and high TDS can produce elevated results that if all the alpha emitters for the sample were added together
the results would be out of balance. Gross alpha was developed for screening of low TDS (less than 500
mg/L) drinking water samples.

Fluoride concentrations are elevated relative to concentrations in wells in the Entrada aquifer but relatively
stable since late 2011.

Nitrate + nitrite values have been increasing since fourth quarter of 2019 and are above concentrations
measured in all other wells.

Sodium concentrations have ranged between and 51 and 148 mg/L since 2011. Sodium concentrations
have been increasing since 2019. All other wells measured have sodium concentration values of
approximately 20 mg/L.

Sulfate values generally remain elevated and fluctuating between 69 and 163 mg/L since 2018. Reported
concentrations have generally been increasing since 2021. All other wells, except RM20, measured have
sulfate concentration values less than 50 mg/L.

Total dissolved solids (TDS) values have generally been increasing since 2018 with a historic high of 590
reported in the fourth quarter of 2023. TDS in this well exceeded GWQS. This TDS concentration pattern
is not exhibited by any other well and the basis for the change is not known.

Reported uranium concentrations from the last twelve quarters show an increasing trend similar to that
observed in well RM20. These concentrations range from 0.0096 to 0.018 mg/L and are well below the
drinking water standard of 0.03 mg/L.

Well RM12
Groundwater quality data and graphs of data trends for well RM12 are presented in Appendix B. Well
RM12 monitors the shallow portion of the Entrada aquifer (approximately 13 feet of saturated screen
length) upgradient of the tailings cell and is considered a background well. Concentrations of uranium and
sulfate are greater than all other wells except RM8 and RM20. Chloride concentrations are greater than all
other wells but RM8.

Magnesium concentrations in RM12 are higher than any other well. Based on the upgradient location of
RM12, these conditions appear to reflect natural variability and not effects from Facility activities.

Bicarbonate concentrations in the groundwater sampled from RM12 are routinely higher than all other wells
except RM1.
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
AR
HC
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility 12 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report - 2023
February 2024

Well RM20
Groundwater quality data and graphs of data trends for RM20 are presented in Appendix B. Well RM20
monitors the groundwater in the Entrada aquifer, downgradient from the tailings cell point of compliance
wells and vertically below RM8.

The bicarbonate and nitrate + nitrite concentrations are less than all other wells.

Arsenic values have remained elevated above other wells excluding RM8. Groundwater concentrations
remain below those reported prior to 2008. The fourth quarter 2023 concentration was 0.008 mg/L.

Calcium values were relatively stable although elevated (40 mg/L) at concentrations approximately 30
percent greater than most other wells through fourth quarter 2008. Reported concentrations have generally
decreased since that time to a current value of 29 mg/L. Reported groundwater concentrations are similar
to those reported for RM8.

Magnesium exhibited a generally decreasing trend between 2013 and 2018. Reported concentrations have
fluctuated since 2018 and the current concentration, 17 mg/L, is below all other wells.

Selenium values were elevated but steadily decreasing between March 2004 and May 2016 from a high of
0.025 mg/L to values around 0.0055 mg/L in March 2016. The current concentration, 0.006 mg/L, is similar
to groundwater concentrations reported for all other wells.

Sulfate values have been elevated above all other wells except for RM8 but steadily decreasing since 2004
from a high of 131 mg/L to current values of around 47 mg/L. All other Entrada aquifer wells have sulfate
concentrations less than 50 mg/L.

Reported TDS values were stable and slightly elevated above other Entrada aquifer wells between 2006
and fourth quarter 2012. Reported concentrations appear to be relatively stable and below the values
reported from several other wells. Current concentrations are reported at 230 mg/L.

Uranium values remained slightly elevated above all other wells, except RM8, but relatively stable in 2023
with concentrations near 0.013 mg/L. These uranium concentrations historically tracked closely with the
concentrations in the upgradient background RM12 until 2019 when uranium in RM20 began a slight
increasing trend. Uranium concentrations in RM20 have fluctuated slightly since 2014 and remain below
the drinking water standard.

Utah GWQS were not exceeded for any constituent in the uppermost aquifer.

5.3 Quality Assurance & Quality Control
Groundwater monitoring at the Facility is conducted in compliance with the Permit (UGW170003), dated
May 14, 2019 as well as the License and an approved groundwater monitoring QAP, which is referenced
in the Permit in Section 1.E.1.a. The following section presents a review of the field sampling and analytical
data with respect to the QAP quality assurance/quality control requirements and objectives for the
groundwater monitoring program.

The detailed narrative regarding the quality assurance review and corrective action for the first half of 2023
was presented in Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Semi-Annual 2023 Groundwater Monitoring Report
and are not presented in this report. If any corrective actions were proposed and implemented from the first
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
AR
HC
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility 13 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report - 2023
February 2024
half of 2023, those proposed corrective actions would be presented in Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Semi-Annual 2023 Groundwater Monitoring Report and are not presented in this report.

5.4 Field Data
This section addresses the QA\QC review of the third and fourth quarter 2023 analytical data.

5.4.1 Sampling Preparation
Sample bottles are ordered from Pace, which maintained current certification with the State of Utah for all
sampling periods.

5.4.2 Daily Meter Calibration
All instrument calibrations were performed with pre-mixed NIST traceable buffers and standards solutions
(± 1 percent accuracy) at the start of each sampling day. The calibration of the meter is documented on
field sampling forms provided with this report (Attachment B). All calibrations were performed according
to the QAP and documentation commitments were met with no exceptions.

The Slope Indicator water level meter was confirmed to be operating appropriately for all sampling events.

5.4.3 Groundwater Level Measurement
Groundwater levels were measured to the nearest 0.01 feet using a Slope Indicator water level meter with
no exceptions.

5.4.4 Calculation of Well Casing Volumes
As specified by the approved QAP, well casing groundwater volumes and purge amounts are calculated in
the field and documented on the field sampling forms. Well casing volumes are calculated according to
Section 4.3 of the approved QAP. Based on the well construction details and the measured groundwater
levels, the well casing volume was appropriately calculated and documented for each well for both periods
with no exceptions.

5.4.5 Pumping Rate Determination
The rate at which each well is pumped is calculated by measuring the time for the pumping discharge to fill
a set of 30-gallon buckets with 2.5-gallon graduated markings, the total volume purged is confirmed by
measuring the total volume pumped. The pumping rate was determined and recorded for each well for all
sampling periods with no exceptions.

5.4.6 Meter Function Checks
Prior to sampling each well, function of the pH, conductivity and temperature meter is verified using
standard solutions derived from the same standards used in the daily calibration. The meter function check
met the acceptability criteria (± 0.2 standard pH units and ± 10% of the conductivity standard value) with
no exceptions for all sampling periods.

ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
AR
HC
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility 14 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report - 2023
February 2024
5.4.7 Pre-Sampling Well Purging & Field Parameter Stabilization
A complete well casing volume was purged from all wells, except RM12 in the fourth quarter. Well RM12
routinely stops pumping water before one casing volume is purged. Pumping volumes were confirmed by
measuring all pump discharge with 30-gallon buckets. As described in Section 3.3.5 of the approved QAP,
the groundwater stabilization parameters of the purged water, specific conductance and pH, were stable
prior to sample collection.

5.4.8 Well Sampling
Because RM12 routinely purges dry before one casing volume can be purged, the sample was collected
above the pump when approximately one gallon remained of the calculated purge volume.

All bottles, for analytes that require filtering, are filtered to 0.45 μm and preserved in the field. Once
collected and placed in the appropriate containers with the appropriate preservatives, the samples were
placed into coolers with ice packs. Samples were kept in the iced coolers or a secure refrigerator at 4°C ±
2°C until transport to the laboratory.

All sampling, bottle labeling, filtering, preservation, and handling were as required by the approved QAP.
All samples were received by the laboratory below the required 4°C (± 2°C) temperature range as confirmed
by the chain of custody form and the Pace condition upon receipt checklist included with the laboratory
report sheets in this report (Attachment C). The 0.5 gallon bottle for RM20 was leaking when it arrived at
the laboratory. Laboratory staff transferred the contents of the leaking bottle to another bottle and analyzed
as usual.

5.5 Laboratory Data Reduction, Validation and Reporting
5.5.1 Holding Time
All analyses conducted on samples were analyzed within the method specified holding time for samples
from the third and fourth quarter 2023 sampling events.

5.5.2 Chain of Custody Forms
Chain of custody forms were complete and accurate for both the third and fourth quarter 2023 sampling
events.

5.5.3 Analytes, Methods and Reporting Limits
All samples were analyzed for the indicated analyses and the requested methods and met laboratory and
QAP criteria. Reporting limits for the fourth quarter 2023 sampling of the tailings sump for chloride and
sulfate and RM8 for chloride were above QAP approved reporting limits. All results for these analytes
were above the respective reporting limits.

5.5.4 Analytical Accuracy
The accuracy of the data was evaluated based on the laboratory method blank (MB), lab control sample
(LCS) recovery, matrix spike (MS) and matrix spike duplicate (MSD), and laboratory duplicate results.

ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
AR
HC
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility 15 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report - 2023
February 2024
Pace reports routine reporting limits on the Analytical QA Summary Report provided with each work order.
The reporting limits for QA samples as reported on this routine report are higher than the QAP Table 3-2
values for several analytes. However, Pace has stated that if a laboratory blank has a value higher than the
reporting limit requested by Anfield, Pace will flag the result. None of the QA sample results were flagged
with qualifiers for reporting limit.

5.5.5 Lab Control Samples
All lab control samples (LCS) recoveries were within the required percent recovery limits for all
compounds.

5.5.6 Matrix Spike and Matrix Spike Duplicate Recoveries
Matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate recoveries for nitrate+nitrite were outside laboratory acceptance criteria
for the fourth quarter 2023 sampling.

5.5.7 Analytical Precision
Evaluation of analytical precision was based on field duplicate relative percent difference values (RPDs).
As per Section 4.3 of the approved QAP, if the concentration or activity of any constituent is more than
five times greater than the reporting limit (RL), an RPD of more than 20 percent between the primary and
blind duplicate sample must be investigated. If the concentration or activity of any constituent is less than
five times greater than the reporting limit (RL), a relative difference (RD) of more than one between the
primary and blind duplicate sample must be investigated.
MS\MSD Precision
All MS\MSD pair RPDs were within acceptable range of for all MS\MSD analyses for the third and fourth
quarter 2023 sampling events with no exceptions.
Laboratory Duplicate Precision
Laboratory duplicate samples for analysis for all analytes was within laboratory acceptance criteria for the
third and fourth quarter 2023 sampling events with the exception of carbonate in the fourth quarter 2023.

Field Sample Precision
Precision was evaluated with the field duplicate samples identified as RM100 as outlined in Section 5.1.
The agreement between the primary and blind field duplicate samples for all sampling events was good
with analytes having a RPD value less than 15 percent or a replicate error ratio (RER) value of less than 2.
The calculated RPD and RER values are presented in Attachment C.

5.6 Internal QA Review & Reporting
This report has undergone internal review by the Facility RSO and the senior management of Anfield.
Corrective actions for the quality assurance issues identified above, including internal quality assurance
reviews, are addressed in the following section.
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
AR
HC
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility 16 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report - 2023
February 2024
6.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION
No additional corrective action is necessary.

ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
AR
HC
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility 17 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report - 2023
February 2024
7.0 REFERENCES
Hydro-Engineering, LLC. 1998. Ground-Water Hydrology of Shootaring Canyon Tailings Site, consulting
Report for Plateau Resources, LTD.

Hydro-Engineering, LLC. 1999. Aquifer Properties of New Wells and Recommended Sampling Rates,
Consulting Report for Plateau Resources, LTD.

Hydro-Engineering, LLC. 2000. Update of the Ground-Water Hydrology of Shootaring Canyon Tailings
Site, Consulting Report for Plateau Resources, LTD.

Hydro-Engineering, LLC. 2001. Groundwater Monitoring of Shootaring Canyon Tailings Site, 2000,
Consulting Report for Plateau Resources, LTD.

Hydro-Engineering, LLC. 2002. Groundwater Monitoring of Shootaring Canyon Tailings Site, 2001,
Consulting Report for Plateau Resources, LTD.

Hydro-Engineering, LLC. 2003. Groundwater Monitoring of Shootaring Canyon Tailings Site, 2002,
Consulting Report for Plateau Resources, LTD.

Hydro-Engineering, LLC. 2004. Groundwater Monitoring of Shootaring Canyon Tailings Site, 2003,
Consulting Report for Plateau Resources, LTD.

Hydro-Engineering, LLC. 2005a. Groundwater Monitoring of Shootaring Canyon Tailings Site, 2004,
Consulting Report for Plateau Resources, LTD.

Hydro-Engineering, LLC. 2005b. Ground-water Monitoring of Shootaring Canyon Tailings Site, 2005,
Consulting Report for Plateau Resources, LTD.

Hydro-Engineering, LLC. 2005c. Tailings Management Plan for Shootaring Canyon Uranium Processing
Facility, 2005, Consulting Report for Plateau Resources, LTD.

Hydro-Engineering, LLC. 2007. Ground-water Monitoring of Shootaring Canyon Tailings Site, 2006,
Consulting Report for Plateau Resources, LTD.

Hydro-Engineering, LLC and Environmental Resources Group, 2005, Tailings Reclamation and
Decommissioning Plan for Shootaring Canyon Uranium Project, 2005, Consulting Report for
Plateau Resources, LTD.

ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
AR
HC

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report - 2023
February 2024

TABLES

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Table 2-1 - Summary of Monitoring Wells and Background Data Collection
PVC
Casing
Inside
Diameter
(inches)
RM 1 3 L,S Active &
Required Dedicated Submersible Pump
RM2R 5 L,S Active &
Required Dedicated Submersible Pump
RM7 3 L,S Active &
Required Dedicated Submersible Pump
RM8 3 L Active &
Required Dedicated Submersible Pump
RM12 5 L,S Active &
Required Dedicated Submersible Pump
RM14 5 L,S Active &
Required Dedicated Submersible Pump
RM18 5 L,S Active &
Required Dedicated Submersible Pump
RM19 5 L,S Active &
Required Dedicated Submersible Pump
RM20 5 L Active &
Required Dedicated Submersible Pump
RM3 6 ----Abandoned ----
RM4R 5 ----Abandoned ----
RM10 5 ----Abandoned ----
RM11 5 ----Abandoned ----
RM13 5 ----Abandoned ----
RM15 5 ----Abandoned ----
RM16 5 ----Abandoned ----
RM17 5 ----Abandoned ----
RM21 5 ----Active & Not
Required ----
RM22 5 ----Active & Not
Required ----
PZ4 1 ----Abandoned ----
PZ5 1 ----Abandoned ----
PZ6 1 ----Abandoned ----
L = Water-Level Measurement
S = Water-Quality Sample
Well Name Data Type Status Sample Method
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Table 2-2 - Groundwater Discharge Monitoring Parameters and State Standards
Parameter Units Groundwater Quality
Standard
pH (field)S.U.6.5-8.5
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 500
Chloride mg/L 250
Fluoride mg/L 4
Ammonia mg/L 30
Nitrate + Nitrite as N mg/L 10
Sulfate mg/L 500
Arsenic mg/L 0.05
Barium mg/L 2
Cadmium mg/L 0.005
Chromium mg/L 0.1
Copper mg/L 1.3
Lead mg/L 0.015
Mercury mg/L 0.002
Molybdenum mg/L 0.1
Selenium mg/L 0.05
Silver mg/L 0.1
Zinc mg/L 5
Uranium, natural mg/L 0.03
Radium-226 pCi/L 5
†Gross Alpha pCi/L 15
† = Parameter required by Permit Section I.E.1.e.iii.B.1 to develop background
data for the future compliance with Table 2 requirements
Table 3-1 - Water Level Elevations
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Location
Name Date Depth to GW
Elev GW
Measured Location Name Date Depth to GW
Elev GW
Measured
OW1A 3/3/98 218.18 4254.35 RM10 12/9/99 92.00 4251.57
OW1A 1/25/03 229.20 4243.33 RM10 12/16/99 92.00 4251.57
OW1A 1/16/04 222.30 4250.23 RM10 3/3/00 95.19 4248.38
OW1A 9/21/04 239.40 4233.13 RM10 5/4/00 97.25 4246.32
OW1A 6/15/05 258.90 4213.63 RM10 9/27/00 96.83 4246.74
OW1B 2/2/03 448.20 4026.03 RM10 12/26/00 98.00 4245.57
OW1B 1/16/04 448.20 4026.03 RM10 3/12/01 96.15 4247.42
OW1B 9/21/04 449.73 4024.5 RM10 5/17/01 94.97 4248.6
OW2 1/25/03 222.90 4247.8 RM10 9/10/01 94.40 4249.17
OW2 1/16/04 229.50 4241.2 RM10 2/5/02 96.10 4247.47
OW2 9/21/04 228.50 4242.2 RM10 10/13/02 96.80 4246.77
OW2 6/15/05 236.50 4234.2 RM10 4/19/03 95.10 4248.47
OW3 2/2/03 453.20 4017.58 RM10 10/15/03 95.30 4248.27
OW3 1/16/04 452.90 4017.88 RM11 11/6/99 180.57 4255.57
OW3 9/21/04 452.85 4017.93 RM11 11/13/99 180.59 4255.55
OW4 1/25/03 213.55 4258.99 RM11 12/10/99 181.32 4254.82
OW4 1/16/04 231.30 4241.24 RM11 3/4/00 182.75 4253.39
OW4 9/21/04 230.48 4242.06 RM11 5/2/00 182.93 4253.21
OW4 6/15/05 238.30 4234.24 RM11 9/27/00 182.19 4253.95
PZ4 12/9/99 25.00 4322.17 RM11 11/29/00 184.12 4252.02
PZ4 3/3/00 25.00 4322.17 RM11 3/15/01 179.69 4256.45
PZ4 5/3/00 25.00 4322.17 RM11 5/17/01 179.60 4256.54
PZ4 11/28/00 25.00 4322.17 RM11 9/10/01 179.60 4256.54
PZ4 3/14/01 25.00 4322.17 RM11 3/19/02 181.00 4255.14
PZ4 5/17/01 25.00 4322.17 RM11 10/27/02 184.50 4251.64
PZ4 9/16/01 25.00 4322.17 RM11 3/24/03 184.90 4251.24
PZ4 1/27/03 26.25 4320.92 RM11 10/19/03 184.70 4251.44
PZ4 4/28/03 26.25 4320.92 RM13 10/22/99 188.71 4246.1
PZ5 12/9/99 25.00 4319.79 RM13 12/14/99 188.38 4246.43
PZ5 3/3/00 25.00 4319.79 RM13 3/7/00 188.23 4246.58
PZ5 5/3/00 25.00 4319.79 RM13 5/3/00 189.45 4245.36
PZ5 11/28/00 25.00 4319.79 RM13 9/26/00 190.00 4244.81
PZ5 3/14/01 25.00 4319.79 RM13 11/28/00 189.68 4245.13
PZ5 5/17/01 25.00 4319.79 RM13 3/14/01 187.93 4246.88
PZ5 9/16/01 25.00 4319.79 RM13 5/17/01 187.80 4247.01
PZ5 1/27/03 26.30 4318.49 RM13 9/10/01 189.90 4244.91
PZ5 4/28/03 26.30 4318.49 RM13 1/28/02 188.10 4246.71
PZ6 12/9/99 25.00 4337.5 RM13 3/12/02 188.00 4246.81
PZ6 3/3/00 25.00 4337.5 RM13 9/8/02 188.10 4246.71
PZ6 5/3/00 25.00 4337.5 RM13 3/24/03 188.40 4246.41
PZ6 11/28/00 25.00 4337.5 RM13 10/16/03 189.60 4245.21
PZ6 3/14/01 25.00 4337.5 RM15 3/3/98 106.38 4237.37
PZ6 5/17/01 25.00 4337.5 RM15 12/11/99 105.96 4237.79
PZ6 9/16/01 25.00 4337.5 RM15 3/7/00 105.80 4237.95
PZ6 1/27/03 25.60 4336.9 RM15 5/3/00 106.00 4237.75
PZ6 4/28/03 25.60 4336.9 RM15 9/25/00 106.28 4237.47
RM15 11/28/00 105.91 4237.84
RM15 3/14/01 105.73 4238.02
RM15 5/17/01 105.82 4237.93
RM15 9/10/01 106.15 4237.6
RM15 3/18/02 106.00 4237.75
RM15 10/14/02 105.92 4237.83
RM15 4/20/03 105.10 4238.65
RM15 10/15/03 107.70 4236.05
Table 3-1 - Water Level Elevations
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Location
Name Date Depth to GW
Elev GW
Measured Location Name Date Depth to GW
Elev GW
Measured
RM16 10/16/99 193.84 4241.11 RM22 11/5/03 120.00 4290.52
RM16 10/20/99 193.84 4241.11 RM22 11/12/03 120.00 4290.52
RM16 11/13/99 193.89 4241.06 RM22 6/16/04 120.00 4290.52
RM16 12/13/99 193.77 4241.18 RM22 9/21/04 120.80 4289.72
RM16 3/4/00 193.78 4241.17 RM22 12/15/04 120.80 4289.72
RM16 5/3/00 193.60 4241.35 RM22 3/20/05 120.80 4289.72
RM16 9/26/00 193.77 4241.18 RM22 6/8/05 120.80 4289.72
RM16 11/29/00 193.64 4241.31 RM22 12/12/05 120.80 4289.72
RM16 3/12/01 193.51 4241.44 RM22 3/11/06 120.80 4289.72
RM16 5/17/01 193.62 4241.33 RM22 6/13/06 120.80 4289.72
RM16 9/10/01 194.00 4240.95 RM22 9/18/06 120.80 4289.72
RM16 1/28/02 193.60 4241.35 RM22 12/9/06 120.80 4289.72
RM16 3/11/02 193.80 4241.15 RM3 3/2/98 215.12 4246.2
RM16 3/27/02 193.44 4241.51 RM3 10/12/99 214.65 4246.67
RM16 9/8/02 194.30 4240.65 RM3 12/12/99 214.60 4246.72
RM16 3/24/03 193.75 4241.2 RM3 3/5/00 214.62 4246.7
RM16 10/16/03 194.60 4240.35 RM3 5/4/00 214.40 4246.92
RM17 10/16/99 187.02 4246.56 RM3 9/27/00 214.60 4246.72
RM17 10/20/99 186.92 4246.66 RM3 12/25/00 214.50 4246.82
RM17 11/2/99 187.38 4246.2 RM3 3/15/01 214.48 4246.84
RM17 12/13/99 187.13 4246.45 RM3 5/17/01 214.46 4246.86
RM17 3/7/00 187.20 4246.38 RM3 9/17/01 214.30 4247.02
RM17 5/3/00 187.11 4246.47 RM3 3/11/02 214.70 4246.62
RM17 9/26/00 187.19 4246.39 RM3 10/14/02 214.70 4246.62
RM17 11/28/00 187.28 4246.3 RM3 3/24/03 214.66 4246.66
RM17 3/14/01 187.85 4245.73 RM3 10/19/03 214.80 4246.52
RM17 5/17/01 187.54 4246.04 RM4 3/3/98 155.72 4239.78
RM17 9/10/01 189.00 4244.58 RM4 8/14/98 155.30 4240.2
RM17 1/28/02 187.20 4246.38 RM4 3/8/99 155.14 4240.36
RM17 3/12/02 187.70 4245.88 RM4 9/5/99 155.25 4240.25
RM17 9/8/02 187.40 4246.18 RM4 12/20/99 155.28 4240.22
RM17 3/24/03 187.40 4246.18 RM4 2/12/00 155.04 4240.46
RM17 10/15/03 190.00 4243.58 RM4 3/9/00 155.23 4240.27
RM17 10/15/03 190.00 4243.58 RM4 5/3/00 155.01 4240.49
RM2 3/2/98 257.82 4261.94 RM4 9/25/00 155.27 4240.23
RM2 12/20/99 257.68 4262.08 RM4 11/28/00 155.00 4240.5
RM2 3/9/00 257.92 4261.84 RM4 3/15/01 154.98 4240.52
RM2 5/4/00 257.62 4262.14 RM4 5/17/01 155.24 4240.26
RM2 9/27/00 257.59 4262.17 RM4 9/17/01 155.70 4239.8
RM2 11/29/00 257.60 4262.16 RM4 3/26/02 155.00 4240.5
RM2 3/15/01 257.76 4262 RM4 10/28/02 155.10 4240.4
RM2 5/18/01 257.80 4261.96 RM4 4/27/03 155.40 4240.1
RM2 9/10/01 257.85 4261.91 RM4 10/20/03 155.80 4239.7
RM2 9/16/01 258.20 4261.56
RM2 1/27/03 258.25 4261.51
RM21 11/5/03 140.00 4281.64
RM21 11/12/03 140.00 4281.64
RM21 6/16/04 140.00 4281.64
RM21 9/21/04 141.30 4280.34
RM21 12/15/04 141.30 4280.34
RM21 3/20/05 141.30 4280.34
RM21 6/8/05 141.30 4280.34
RM21 12/13/05 141.30 4280.34
RM21 6/12/06 141.30 4280.34
RM21 9/18/06 141.30 4280.34
RM21 12/9/06 141.30 4280.34
Table 3-1 - Water Level Elevations
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Location
Name Date Depth to GW
Elev GW
Measured Location Name Date Depth to GW
Elev GW
Measured
RM4R 10/16/99 128.18 4240.14 T4 7/29/02 20.00 4411.2
RM4R 10/19/99 127.96 4240.36 T4 8/5/02 20.00 4411.2
RM4R 12/12/99 128.49 4239.83 T4 8/24/02 20.00 4411.2
RM4R 3/8/00 128.23 4240.09 T4 10/3/02 20.00 4411.2
RM4R 5/3/00 128.37 4239.95 T4 10/27/02 20.00 4411.2
RM4R 9/25/00 128.36 4239.96 T4 2/19/03 20.00 4411.2
RM4R 11/28/00 128.30 4240.02 T4 8/15/03 20.00 4411.2
RM4R 3/14/01 128.12 4240.2 T4 9/8/03 20.00 4411.2
RM4R 5/17/01 128.15 4240.17 T4 2/24/04 20.00 4411.2
RM4R 9/17/01 129.00 4239.32 T4 4/14/04 20.00 4411.2
RM4R 3/11/02 128.40 4239.92 T4 8/2/04 20.00 4411.2
RM4R 9/9/02 128.20 4240.12 T4 9/21/04 20.00 4411.2
RM4R 4/20/03 128.00 4240.32 T4 12/30/04 20.00 4411.2
RM4R 10/15/03 128.60 4239.72 T4 3/22/05 20.00 4411.2
RM5 3/3/98 139.40 4239.72 T4 6/15/05 18.40 4412.8
RM5 8/15/98 139.01 4240.11 T4 7/21/05 18.40 4412.8
RM5 3/9/99 138.77 4240.35 T4 9/12/05 18.60 4412.6
RM5 9/5/99 139.05 4240.07 T4 11/13/05 18.82 4412.38
RM5 2/13/00 138.84 4240.28 T4 12/6/05 19.00 4412.2
RM5 5/3/00 138.92 4240.2 T4 2/17/06 19.10 4412.1
RM5 9/26/00 136.00 4243.12 T4 4/20/06 18.30 4412.9
RM5 11/28/00 135.91 4243.21 T4 6/5/06 18.40 4412.8
RM5 3/15/01 138.80 4240.32 T4 8/17/06 18.10 4413.1
RM5 5/17/01 139.21 4239.91 T4 10/27/06 17.40 4413.8
RM5 9/17/01 139.00 4240.12 T4 12/22/06 17.50 4413.7
RM5 3/11/02 139.00 4240.12 T4 3/2/07 17.65 4413.55
RM5 10/14/02 139.31 4239.81 T5 2/13/02 9.9 4415.1
RM5 4/27/03 139.40 4239.72 T5 6/7/02 10 4415
RM5 10/20/03 140.30 4238.82 T5 7/18/02 10 4415
RM6 3/3/98 136.61 4237.96 T5 7/29/02 10 4415
RM6 8/15/98 136.02 4238.55 T5 8/5/02 10 4415
RM6 3/9/99 135.88 4238.69 T5 8/24/02 9.8 4415.2
RM6 9/5/99 136.01 4238.56 T5 8/26/02 9.8 4415.2
RM6 2/14/00 135.95 4238.62 T5 9/3/02 9.9 4415.1
RM6 5/3/00 136.06 4238.51 T5 10/3/02 9.9 4415.1
RM6 9/25/00 136.35 4238.22 T5 10/27/02 9.9 4415.1
RM6 11/28/00 136.30 4238.27 T5 2/19/03 9.9 4415.1
RM6 3/15/01 136.85 4237.72 T5 8/15/03 10 4415
RM6 5/17/01 135.88 4238.69 T5 9/8/03 10 4415
RM6 9/16/01 136.20 4238.37 T5 2/24/04 10 4415
RM6 3/18/02 136.00 4238.57 T5 4/14/04 10 4415
RM6 10/14/02 135.70 4238.87 T5 8/2/04 10 4415
RM6 4/20/03 135.40 4239.17 T5 9/21/04 10 4415
RM6 10/15/03 136.50 4238.07 T5 12/30/04 10 4415
RM9 3/4/98 61.73 4307.58 T5 3/22/05 8.95 4416.05
RM9 4/24/02 60.61 4308.7 T5 6/15/05 9.75 4415.25
RM9 1/27/03 61.60 4307.71 T5 9/12/05 10 4415
RM9 4/22/03 61.20 4308.11 T5 11/13/05 10 4415
RM9 4/24/03 61.50 4307.81 T5 2/18/06 10 4415
RM9 4/26/03 61.10 4308.21 T5 4/20/06 10 4415
RM9 10/20/03 61.30 4308.01 T5 6/5/06 10 4415
T4 2/13/02 20.00 4411.2 T5 8/17/06 9.8 4415.2
T4 6/7/02 20.00 4411.2 T5 10/27/06 9.7 4415.3
T4 7/18/02 20.00 4411.2 T5 12/22/06 9.7 4415.3
T5 3/2/07 8.2 4416.8
Table 3-1 - Water Level Elevations
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Location
Name Date Depth to GW
Elev GW
Measured Location Name Date Depth to GW
Elev GW
Measured
T6 2/13/02 11.7 4417.3
T6 6/7/02 11.7 4417.3
T6 7/18/02 11.7 4417.3
T6 7/29/02 11.7 4417.3
T6 8/5/02 11.7 4417.3
T6 8/24/02 11.7 4417.3
T6 10/3/02 11.7 4417.3
T6 10/27/02 11.7 4417.3
T6 2/18/03 11.7 4417.3
T6 8/15/03 11.7 4417.3
T6 9/8/03 11.7 4417.3
T6 2/24/04 11.7 4417.3
T6 4/14/04 11.7 4417.3
T6 8/2/04 11.7 4417.3
T6 9/21/04 11.7 4417.3
T6 12/30/04 11.7 4417.3
T6 3/22/05 10.95 4418.05
T6 6/15/05 11.7 4417.3
T6 9/12/05 11.7 4417.3
T6 11/13/05 11.7 4417.3
T6 2/18/06 11.7 4417.3
T6 4/20/06 11.7 4417.3
T6 6/5/06 11.7 4417.3
T6 8/17/06 11.8 4417.2
T6 10/27/06 11.8 4417.2
T6 12/22/06 11.7 4417.3
T6 3/2/07 10.7 4418.3
WW2 7/21/05 411.8 4059.81
Table 3-1 - Water Level Elevations
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Location
Name Date Depth to GW
Elev GW
Measured Location Name Date Depth to GW
Elev GW
Measured
RM1 03/02/98 176.23 4272.97 RM1 04/30/12 178.50 4270.70
RM1 08/14/98 176.19 4273.01 RM1 07/23/12 178.60 4270.60
RM1 03/08/99 175.88 4273.32 RM1 10/01/12 178.27 4270.93
RM1 09/04/99 176.03 4273.17 RM1 02/19/13 178.60 4270.60
RM1 12/11/99 175.96 4273.24 RM1 05/13/13 178.60 4270.60
RM1 02/14/00 175.93 4273.27 RM1 07/15/13 178.90 4270.30
RM1 03/05/00 175.79 4273.41 RM1 11/04/13 178.80 4270.40
RM1 05/02/00 175.83 4273.37 RM1 02/26/14 178.75 4270.45
RM1 09/28/00 175.87 4273.33 RM1 04/29/14 178.80 4270.40
RM1 12/26/00 176.00 4273.20 RM1 07/21/14 178.82 4270.38
RM1 03/16/01 175.83 4273.37 RM1 10/27/14 179.00 4270.20
RM1 05/19/01 176.08 4273.12 RM1 02/23/15 178.90 4270.30
RM1 09/11/01 175.50 4273.70 RM1 05/11/15 178.80 4270.40
RM1 03/25/02 176.00 4273.20 RM1 08/10/15 178.90 4270.30
RM1 10/13/02 175.80 4273.40 RM1 10/19/15 178.90 4270.30
RM1 04/26/03 175.80 4273.40 RM1 03/07/16 178.60 4270.60
RM1 11/12/03 176.53 4272.67 RM1 04/29/16 178.90 4270.30
RM1 12/01/03 176.11 4273.09 RM1 08/04/16 178.25 4270.95
RM1 03/22/04 174.90 4274.30 RM1 10/19/16 178.10 4271.10
RM1 06/15/04 176.35 4272.85 RM1 02/14/17 178.13 4271.07
RM1 09/20/04 176.33 4272.87 RM1 05/01/17 177.90 4271.30
RM1 12/13/04 176.50 4272.70 RM1 07/17/17 178.00 4271.20
RM1 03/21/05 176.50 4272.70 RM1 10/31/17 178.00 4271.20
RM1 06/13/05 177.10 4272.10 RM1 02/20/18 178.00 4271.20
RM1 09/12/05 175.20 4274.00 RM1 04/23/18 177.90 4271.30
RM1 12/14/05 177.50 4271.70 RM1 07/08/18 177.90 4271.30
RM1 03/12/06 177.20 4272.00 RM1 10/09/18 177.50 4271.70
RM1 06/12/06 176.80 4272.40 RM1 01/25/19 177.50 4271.70
RM1 09/18/06 177.50 4271.70 RM1 04/28/19 177.70 4271.50
RM1 12/09/06 177.60 4271.60 RM1 07/01/19 178.10 4271.10
RM1 03/10/07 176.50 4272.70 RM1 11/04/19 178.20 4271.00
RM1 06/25/07 176.10 4273.10 RM1 02/16/20 177.76 4271.44
RM1 08/31/07 177.20 4272.00 RM1 05/24/20 177.80 4271.40
RM1 12/04/07 177.75 4271.45 RM1 07/07/20 177.60 4271.60
RM1 03/25/08 177.82 4271.38 RM1 10/05/20 177.93 4271.27
RM1 06/29/08 178.20 4271.00 RM1 01/22/21 177.80 4271.40
RM1 09/22/08 178.20 4271.00 RM1 04/01/21 177.60 4271.60
RM1 12/22/08 178.20 4271.00 RM1 07/09/21 177.70 4271.50
RM1 02/08/09 177.90 4271.30 RM1 10/03/21 177.70 4271.50
RM1 04/12/09 178.06 4271.14 RM1 02/05/22 177.93 4271.27
RM1 08/24/09 177.95 4271.25 RM1 04/02/22 177.75 4271.45
RM1 10/18/09 178.32 4270.88 RM1 07/08/22 177.75 4271.45
RM1 02/01/10 177.90 4271.30 RM1 10/24/22 177.78 4271.42
RM1 03/22/10 178.35 4270.85 RM1 03/10/23 177.75 4271.45
RM1 04/12/10 178.30 4270.90 RM1 04/22/23 177.77 4271.43
RM1 08/17/10 178.40 4270.80 RM1 07/14/23 177.70 4271.50
RM1 10/18/10 178.43 4270.77 RM1 11/05/23 177.70 4271.50
RM1 01/24/11 178.50 4270.70
RM1 04/11/11 178.40 4270.80
RM1 07/25/11 178.50 4270.70
RM1 10/17/11 178.58 4270.62
RM1 02/13/12 178.62 4270.58
Table 3-1 - Water Level Elevations
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Location
Name Date Depth to GW
Elev GW
Measured Location Name Date Depth to GW
Elev GW
Measured
RM2R 10/17/99 241.48 4263.38 RM2R 02/24/14 247.85 4257.01
RM2R 10/19/99 241.64 4263.22 RM2R 04/29/14 247.95 4256.91
RM2R 12/15/99 241.64 4263.22 RM2R 07/21/14 248.00 4256.86
RM2R 03/08/00 241.41 4263.45 RM2R 10/27/14 248.20 4256.66
RM2R 05/04/00 241.22 4263.64 RM2R 02/23/15 248.00 4256.86
RM2R 09/27/00 241.21 4263.65 RM2R 05/11/15 248.20 4256.66
RM2R 11/29/00 241.55 4263.31 RM2R 08/10/15 248.40 4256.46
RM2R 03/15/01 241.35 4263.51 RM2R 10/19/15 248.70 4256.16
RM2R 05/18/01 241.36 4263.50 RM2R 03/07/16 248.70 4256.16
RM2R 09/16/01 241.50 4263.36 RM2R 04/29/16 246.40 4258.46
RM2R 03/18/02 241.30 4263.56 RM2R 08/04/16 246.53 4258.33
RM2R 03/18/02 241.30 4263.56 RM2R 10/19/16 246.20 4258.66
RM2R 10/14/02 241.10 4263.76 RM2R 02/14/17 246.30 4258.56
RM2R 10/14/02 241.00 4263.86 RM2R 05/02/17 245.80 4259.06
RM2R 04/20/03 239.70 4265.16 RM2R 07/17/17 246.00 4258.86
RM2R 11/12/03 242.60 4262.26 RM2R 10/31/17 245.80 4259.06
RM2R 11/30/03 240.41 4264.45 RM2R 02/19/18 245.15 4259.71
RM2R 03/23/04 243.63 4261.23 RM2R 04/23/18 245.40 4259.46
RM2R 06/16/04 242.42 4262.44 RM2R 07/09/18 245.50 4259.36
RM2R 09/20/04 242.20 4262.66 RM2R 10/08/18 245.20 4259.66
RM2R 11/28/04 243.40 4261.46 RM2R 01/25/19 245.40 4259.46
RM2R 03/20/05 241.90 4262.96 RM2R 04/28/19 245.20 4259.66
RM2R 06/13/05 243.70 4261.16 RM2R 07/01/19 245.25 4259.61
RM2R 09/11/05 240.70 4264.16 RM2R 11/04/19 245.20 4259.66
RM2R 12/13/05 239.50 4265.36 RM2R 02/16/20 245.00 4259.86
RM2R 03/11/06 244.50 4260.36 RM2R 05/24/20 244.90 4259.96
RM2R 06/11/06 243.90 4260.96 RM2R 07/06/20 244.85 4260.01
RM2R 06/11/06 243.90 4260.96 RM2R 10/04/20 245.10 4259.76
RM2R 09/19/06 241.50 4263.36 RM2R 01/22/21 245.00 4259.86
RM2R 12/10/06 243.10 4261.76 RM2R 04/01/21 244.70 4260.16
RM2R 03/10/07 241.00 4263.86 RM2R 07/09/21 244.70 4260.16
RM2R 06/25/07 239.40 4265.46 RM2R 10/03/21 244.75 4260.11
RM2R 08/31/07 240.60 4264.26 RM2R 02/05/22 244.91 4259.95
RM2R 12/04/07 245.90 4258.96 RM2R 04/02/22 244.61 4260.25
RM2R 03/25/08 245.80 4259.06 RM2R 07/09/22 244.60 4260.26
RM2R 06/30/08 246.00 4258.86 RM2R 10/24/22 244.55 4260.31
RM2R 09/22/08 246.45 4258.41 RM2R 03/10/23 244.60 4260.26
RM2R 12/16/08 246.00 4258.86 RM2R 04/22/23 244.75 4260.11
RM2R 02/08/09 246.40 4258.46 RM2R 07/15/23 244.45 4260.41
RM2R 04/12/09 246.45 4258.41 RM2R 11/05/23 244.60 4260.26
RM2R 08/24/09 246.80 4258.06
RM2R 10/18/09 246.98 4257.88
RM2R 12/07/09 246.50 4258.36
RM2R 02/01/10 246.85 4258.01
RM2R 03/22/10 246.90 4257.96
RM2R 04/12/10 246.80 4258.06
RM2R 08/17/10 247.00 4257.86
RM2R 10/18/10 247.10 4257.76
RM2R 01/24/11 247.00 4257.86
RM2R 04/11/11 247.10 4257.76
RM2R 07/25/11 247.35 4257.51
RM2R 10/17/11 247.50 4257.36
RM2R 02/13/12 247.40 4257.46
RM2R 04/30/12 247.55 4257.31
RM2R 07/23/12 247.50 4257.36
RM2R 10/01/12 247.50 4257.36
RM2R 02/19/13 247.45 4257.41
RM2R 05/13/13 247.65 4257.21
RM2R 07/15/13 247.70 4257.16
RM2R 11/04/13 247.80 4257.06
Table 3-1 - Water Level Elevations
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Location
Name Date Depth to GW
Elev GW
Measured Location Name Date Depth to GW
Elev GW
Measured
RM7 03/02/98 140.61 4255.25 RM7 02/15/17 141.80 4254.06
RM7 04/24/02 140.51 4255.35 RM7 05/02/17 141.50 4254.36
RM7 09/08/02 140.40 4255.46 RM7 07/18/17 141.73 4254.13
RM7 04/26/03 139.90 4255.96 RM7 10/30/17 141.65 4254.21
RM7 11/12/03 140.53 4255.33 RM7 02/19/18 141.00 4254.86
RM7 11/30/03 140.20 4255.66 RM7 04/23/18 141.80 4254.06
RM7 03/23/04 141.32 4254.54 RM7 07/09/18 141.85 4254.01
RM7 06/16/04 140.00 4255.86 RM7 10/08/18 141.50 4254.36
RM7 09/21/04 140.20 4255.66 RM7 01/26/19 141.85 4254.01
RM7 09/22/04 140.30 4255.56 RM7 04/28/19 141.71 4254.15
RM7 11/07/04 140.30 4255.56 RM7 07/01/19 141.86 4254.00
RM7 03/20/05 141.00 4254.86 RM7 11/04/19 141.80 4254.06
RM7 06/12/05 139.70 4256.16 RM7 02/16/20 141.75 4254.11
RM7 09/11/05 139.40 4256.46 RM7 05/24/20 141.70 4254.16
RM7 12/12/05 139.10 4256.76 RM7 07/07/20 141.70 4254.16
RM7 03/11/06 140.40 4255.46 RM7 10/05/20 141.95 4253.91
RM7 06/11/06 139.70 4256.16 RM7 01/22/21 141.90 4253.96
RM7 09/19/06 139.60 4256.26 RM7 04/01/21 141.70 4254.16
RM7 12/09/06 140.60 4255.26 RM7 07/09/21 141.90 4253.96
RM7 03/10/07 139.20 4256.66 RM7 10/03/21 141.93 4253.93
RM7 06/24/07 139.30 4256.56 RM7 02/05/22 142.00 4253.86
RM7 08/31/07 139.60 4256.26 RM7 04/02/22 141.70 4254.16
RM7 12/03/07 140.82 4255.04 RM7 07/09/22 141.70 4254.16
RM7 03/25/08 141.00 4254.86 RM7 10/16/22 141.70 4254.16
RM7 06/29/08 141.30 4254.56 RM7 03/10/23 141.75 4254.11
RM7 09/23/08 141.33 4254.53 RM7 04/22/23 142.24 4253.62
RM7 12/16/08 141.00 4254.86 RM7 07/15/23 141.90 4253.96
RM7 02/08/09 140.90 4254.96 RM7 11/05/23 142.37 4253.49
RM7 04/12/09 141.24 4254.62
RM7 08/24/09 141.30 4254.56
RM7 10/18/09 141.47 4254.39
RM7 02/01/10 141.28 4254.58
RM7 03/22/10 141.30 4254.56
RM7 04/12/10 141.15 4254.71
RM7 08/17/10 141.40 4254.46
RM7 10/18/10 141.50 4254.36
RM7 01/24/11 141.55 4254.31
RM7 04/11/11 141.40 4254.46
RM7 07/25/11 141.67 4254.19
RM7 10/17/11 141.55 4254.31
RM7 02/13/12 141.60 4254.26
RM7 04/30/12 141.45 4254.41
RM7 07/23/12 141.65 4254.21
RM7 10/01/12 141.64 4254.22
RM7 02/19/13 141.30 4254.56
RM7 05/13/13 141.60 4254.26
RM7 07/15/13 141.70 4254.16
RM7 11/04/13 141.74 4254.12
RM7 02/24/14 141.70 4254.16
RM7 04/28/14 141.80 4254.06
RM7 07/21/14 141.80 4254.06
RM7 10/27/14 141.90 4253.96
RM7 02/23/15 141.90 4253.96
RM7 05/11/15 141.70 4254.16
RM7 08/10/15 142.00 4253.86
RM7 10/19/15 141.85 4254.01
RM7 03/07/16 142.00 4253.86
RM7 04/29/16 141.50 4254.36
RM7 08/04/16 142.88 4252.98
RM7 10/18/16 141.60 4254.26
Table 3-1 - Water Level Elevations
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Location
Name Date Depth to GW
Elev GW
Measured Location Name Date Depth to GW
Elev GW
Measured
RM8 03/04/98 57.43 4324.34 RM8 02/15/17 54.40 4327.37
RM8 04/24/02 57.40 4324.37 RM8 05/02/17 53.39 4328.38
RM8 01/28/03 57.35 4324.42 RM8 07/18/17 54.19 4327.58
RM8 04/21/03 56.90 4324.87 RM8 10/31/17 53.95 4327.82
RM8 04/24/03 57.50 4324.27 RM8 02/20/18 54.00 4327.77
RM8 04/26/03 56.80 4324.97 RM8 04/23/18 54.15 4327.62
RM8 11/12/03 58.25 4323.52 RM8 07/09/18 54.31 4327.46
RM8 11/30/03 56.80 4324.97 RM8 10/09/18 53.40 4328.37
RM8 03/23/04 58.40 4323.37 RM8 01/26/19 54.15 4327.62
RM8 06/16/04 57.80 4323.97 RM8 04/28/19 53.55 4328.22
RM8 09/21/04 58.00 4323.77 RM8 07/01/19 54.20 4327.57
RM8 11/07/04 58.10 4323.67 RM8 11/04/19 53.50 4328.27
RM8 03/21/05 57.90 4323.87 RM8 02/16/20 53.27 4328.50
RM8 06/12/05 57.90 4323.87 RM8 05/24/20 53.43 4328.34
RM8 09/11/05 58.00 4323.77 RM8 07/07/20 53.88 4327.89
RM8 12/13/05 57.80 4323.97 RM8 10/04/20 54.00 4327.77
RM8 03/11/06 57.90 4323.87 RM8 01/22/21 54.00 4327.77
RM8 06/11/06 57.40 4324.37 RM8 04/01/21 53.95 4327.82
RM8 09/20/06 57.80 4323.97 RM8 07/09/21 54.10 4327.67
RM8 12/08/06 58.40 4323.37 RM8 10/03/21 54.18 4327.59
RM8 03/10/07 56.90 4324.87 RM8 02/05/22 54.20 4327.57
RM8 06/24/07 56.50 4325.27 RM8 04/02/22 53.90 4327.87
RM8 08/31/07 57.20 4324.57 RM8 07/09/22 53.92 4327.85
RM8 12/04/07 57.45 4324.32 RM8 10/15/22 53.25 4328.52
RM8 03/26/08 56.93 4324.84 RM8 03/10/23 53.50 4328.27
RM8 06/30/08 57.20 4324.57 RM8 04/22/23 54.40 4327.37
RM8 09/23/08 57.88 4323.89 RM8 07/15/23 53.42 4328.35
RM8 12/15/08 57.33 4324.44 RM8 11/05/23 54.52 4327.25
RM8 02/08/09 57.05 4324.72
RM8 04/12/09 56.79 4324.98
RM8 08/24/09 57.17 4324.60
RM8 10/18/09 57.15 4324.62
RM8 02/01/10 56.40 4325.37
RM8 03/22/10 56.05 4325.72
RM8 04/12/10 56.20 4325.57
RM8 08/17/10 56.60 4325.17
RM8 01/24/11 56.00 4325.77
RM8 04/11/11 55.90 4325.87
RM8 07/25/11 55.80 4325.97
RM8 10/17/11 56.38 4325.39
RM8 02/13/12 55.65 4326.12
RM8 04/30/12 55.40 4326.37
RM8 07/23/12 55.45 4326.32
RM8 10/01/12 55.82 4325.95
RM8 02/19/13 54.80 4326.97
RM8 05/13/13 55.00 4326.77
RM8 07/15/13 54.90 4326.87
RM8 11/04/13 54.90 4326.87
RM8 02/24/14 54.70 4327.07
RM8 04/28/14 54.70 4327.07
RM8 07/21/14 54.50 4327.27
RM8 10/27/14 54.50 4327.27
RM8 02/23/15 54.20 4327.57
RM8 05/11/15 54.00 4327.77
RM8 08/10/15 54.00 4327.77
RM8 10/19/15 54.10 4327.67
RM8 03/07/16 54.30 4327.47
RM8 04/29/16 53.45 4328.32
RM8 08/04/16 53.75 4328.02
RM8 10/18/16 53.40 4328.37
Table 3-1 - Water Level Elevations
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Location
Name Date Depth to GW
Elev GW
Measured Location Name Date Depth to GW
Elev GW
Measured
RM12 03/02/98 142.44 4273.51 RM12 04/29/14 144.20 4271.75
RM12 12/09/99 142.49 4273.46 RM12 07/21/14 144.30 4271.65
RM12 12/14/99 142.49 4273.46 RM12 10/27/14 144.30 4271.65
RM12 03/04/00 142.38 4273.57 RM12 02/23/15 144.30 4271.65
RM12 03/10/00 142.50 4273.45 RM12 05/11/15 144.20 4271.75
RM12 05/04/00 142.65 4273.3 RM12 08/10/15 144.35 4271.60
RM12 09/28/00 142.79 4273.16 RM12 10/19/15 144.20 4271.75
RM12 12/26/00 143.00 4272.95 RM12 03/07/16 144.00 4271.95
RM12 03/16/01 142.40 4273.55 RM12 04/29/16 144.20 4271.75
RM12 05/19/01 142.42 4273.53 RM12 08/04/16 144.20 4271.75
RM12 09/11/01 147.00 4268.95 RM12 10/18/06 144.05 4271.90
RM12 03/26/02 146.00 4269.95 RM12 02/14/17 144.25 4271.70
RM12 10/13/02 146.40 4269.55 RM12 05/02/17 143.98 4271.97
RM12 01/27/03 142.50 4273.45 RM12 07/17/17 144.30 4271.65
RM12 04/21/03 143.20 4272.75 RM12 10/30/17 144.30 4271.65
RM12 11/12/03 142.73 4273.22 RM12 02/20/18 143.90 4272.05
RM12 12/01/03 143.90 4272.05 RM12 04/23/18 144.20 4271.75
RM12 03/22/04 143.20 4272.75 RM12 07/08/18 144.25 4271.70
RM12 06/15/04 142.38 4273.57 RM12 10/09/18 144.00 4271.95
RM12 09/20/04 142.49 4273.46 RM12 01/25/19 144.25 4271.70
RM12 11/29/04 142.90 4273.05 RM12 04/28/19 144.15 4271.80
RM12 03/21/05 142.50 4273.45 RM12 07/01/19 144.13 4271.82
RM12 06/13/05 143.20 4272.75 RM12 11/04/19 144.50 4271.45
RM12 09/12/05 142.40 4273.55 RM12 02/16/20 144.20 4271.75
RM12 12/14/05 142.50 4273.45 RM12 05/24/20 144.25 4271.70
RM12 03/12/06 143.80 4272.15 RM12 07/07/20 144.30 4271.65
RM12 06/12/06 142.70 4273.25 RM12 10/04/20 144.25 4271.70
RM12 09/18/06 143.20 4272.75 RM12 01/22/21 144.30 4271.65
RM12 12/09/06 143.40 4272.55 RM12 04/01/21 144.10 4271.85
RM12 03/10/07 143.30 4272.65 RM12 07/09/21 144.15 4271.80
RM12 06/25/07 143.10 4272.85 RM12 10/03/21 144.32 4271.63
RM12 08/31/07 143.90 4272.05 RM12 02/05/22 144.34 4271.61
RM12 12/04/07 143.15 4272.80 RM12 04/02/22 144.12 4271.83
RM12 03/25/08 143.60 4272.35 RM12 07/08/22 144.12 4271.83
RM12 06/29/08 143.80 4272.15 RM12 10/15/22 144.14 4271.81
RM12 09/22/08 143.75 4272.20 RM12 03/10/23 144.30 4271.65
RM12 12/15/08 143.63 4272.32 RM12 04/22/23 144.22 4271.73
RM12 02/08/09 143.65 4272.30 RM12 07/14/23 144.03 4271.92
RM12 04/12/09 143.66 4272.29 RM12 11/05/23 144.30 4271.65
RM12 08/24/09 143.85 4272.10
RM12 10/18/09 143.96 4271.99
RM12 02/01/10 143.90 4272.05
RM12 03/22/10 144.00 4271.95
RM12 04/12/10 143.90 4272.05
RM12 08/17/10 143.90 4272.05
RM12 10/19/10 143.94 4272.01
RM12 01/24/11 144.15 4271.80
RM12 04/11/11 144.10 4271.85
RM12 07/25/11 144.15 4271.80
RM12 10/17/11 144.32 4271.63
RM12 02/13/12 144.3 4271.65
RM12 04/30/12 144.01 4271.94
RM12 07/23/12 144.70 4271.25
RM12 10/01/12 144.15 4271.80
RM12 02/19/13 144.10 4271.85
RM12 05/13/13 144.20 4271.75
RM12 07/15/13 144.23 4271.72
RM12 11/04/13 144.18 4271.77
RM12 02/24/14 144.25 4271.70
Table 3-1 - Water Level Elevations
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Location
Name Date Depth to GW
Elev GW
Measured Location Name Date Depth to GW
Elev GW
Measured
RM14 10/21/99 192.07 4258.77 RM14 11/04/13 193.70 4257.14
RM14 11/11/99 192.12 4258.72 RM14 02/24/14 193.65 4257.19
RM14 12/15/99 192.23 4258.61 RM14 04/29/14 193.53 4257.31
RM14 03/08/00 191.26 4259.58 RM14 07/21/14 193.00 4257.84
RM14 05/04/00 191.62 4259.22 RM14 10/27/14 193.80 4257.04
RM14 09/27/00 191.16 4259.68 RM14 02/23/15 193.70 4257.14
RM14 11/29/00 191.77 4259.07 RM14 05/11/15 193.60 4257.24
RM14 03/14/01 191.67 4259.17 RM14 08/10/15 193.80 4257.04
RM14 05/18/01 191.63 4259.21 RM14 10/19/15 193.80 4257.04
RM14 09/17/01 191.31 4259.53 RM14 03/07/16 193.80 4257.04
RM14 01/28/02 191.60 4259.24 RM14 04/29/16 193.70 4257.14
RM14 03/18/02 192.00 4258.84 RM14 08/04/16 193.78 4257.06
RM14 03/27/02 192.10 4258.74 RM14 10/18/16 193.50 4257.34
RM14 10/13/02 192.10 4258.74 RM14 02/14/17 193.68 4257.16
RM14 04/20/03 191.80 4259.04 RM14 05/02/17 193.35 4257.49
RM14 11/12/03 192.23 4258.61 RM14 07/17/17 193.40 4257.44
RM14 11/30/03 192.30 4258.54 RM14 10/31/17 193.40 4257.44
RM14 03/23/04 193.09 4257.75 RM14 02/19/18 193.20 4257.64
RM14 06/16/04 191.50 4259.34 RM14 03/13/18 193.50 4257.34
RM14 09/20/04 191.62 4259.22 RM14 04/23/18 193.20 4257.64
RM14 11/28/04 191.30 4259.54 RM14 07/09/18 193.60 4257.24
RM14 03/20/05 191.70 4259.14 RM14 10/08/18 193.30 4257.54
RM14 06/13/05 191.90 4258.94 RM14 01/26/19 193.40 4257.44
RM14 09/12/05 191.70 4259.14 RM14 04/28/19 193.60 4257.24
RM14 12/13/05 191.20 4259.64 RM14 07/01/19 193.70 4257.14
RM14 03/11/06 192.10 4258.74 RM14 11/04/19 193.55 4257.29
RM14 06/12/06 191.80 4259.04 RM14 02/16/20 193.50 4257.34
RM14 09/19/06 191.10 4259.74 RM14 05/24/20 193.51 4257.33
RM14 09/19/06 191.10 4259.74 RM14 07/07/20 193.55 4257.29
RM14 12/09/06 192.50 4258.34 RM14 10/04/20 193.60 4257.24
RM14 03/10/07 192.50 4258.34 RM14 01/22/21 193.50 4257.34
RM14 06/24/07 192.10 4258.74 RM14 04/01/21 193.60 4257.24
RM14 08/31/07 192.80 4258.04 RM14 07/09/21 193.10 4257.74
RM14 12/03/07 192.20 4258.64 RM14 10/03/21 193.70 4257.14
RM14 03/26/08 192.80 4258.04 RM14 02/05/22 193.60 4257.24
RM14 06/29/08 192.90 4257.94 RM14 04/02/22 193.51 4257.33
RM14 09/23/08 193.23 4257.61 RM14 07/09/22 193.52 4257.32
RM14 12/16/08 192.85 4257.99 RM14 10/15/22 193.50 4257.34
RM14 02/08/09 192.79 4258.05 RM14 03/10/23 193.45 4257.39
RM14 04/12/09 192.80 4258.04 RM14 04/22/23 193.83 4257.01
RM14 08/24/09 193.26 4257.58 RM14 07/15/23 193.48 4257.36
RM14 10/19/09 193.00 4257.84 RM14 11/05/23 193.90 4256.94
RM14 02/01/10 193.00 4257.84
RM14 03/22/10 193.20 4257.64
RM14 04/12/10 193.00 4257.84
RM14 08/17/10 193.00 4257.84
RM14 08/30/10 193.00 4257.84
RM14 10/18/10 193.30 4257.54
RM14 01/24/11 193.30 4257.54
RM14 04/11/11 193.30 4257.54
RM14 07/25/11 193.35 4257.49
RM14 10/17/11 193.50 4257.34
RM14 02/13/12 193.62 4257.22
RM14 04/30/12 193.40 4257.44
RM14 07/23/12 193.60 4257.24
RM14 10/01/12 193.50 4257.34
RM14 02/19/13 193.60 4257.24
RM14 05/13/13 193.65 4257.19
RM14 07/15/13 193.60 4257.24
Table 3-1 - Water Level Elevations
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Location
Name Date Depth to GW
Elev GW
Measured Location Name Date Depth to GW
Elev GW
Measured
RM18 11/02/03 174.50 4247.06 RM18 02/14/17 166.02 4255.54
RM18 11/12/03 164.41 4257.15 RM18 05/02/17 165.70 4255.86
RM18 11/21/03 164.30 4257.26 RM18 07/17/17 165.90 4255.66
RM18 11/30/03 164.30 4257.26 RM18 10/31/17 165.90 4255.66
RM18 03/23/04 165.29 4256.27 RM18 02/19/18 165.50 4256.06
RM18 06/16/04 164.00 4257.56 RM18 04/23/18 165.90 4255.66
RM18 09/21/04 164.10 4257.46 RM18 07/09/18 166.14 4255.42
RM18 11/29/04 163.80 4257.76 RM18 10/09/18 165.80 4255.76
RM18 03/20/05 164.40 4257.16 RM18 01/26/19 166.10 4255.46
RM18 06/12/05 163.70 4257.86 RM18 04/28/19 165.90 4255.66
RM18 09/11/05 162.70 4258.86 RM18 07/01/19 166.25 4255.31
RM18 12/13/05 167.70 4253.86 RM18 11/04/19 166.00 4255.56
RM18 03/11/06 168.20 4253.36 RM18 02/16/20 166.00 4255.56
RM18 03/11/06 168.20 4253.36 RM18 05/24/20 165.91 4255.65
RM18 06/11/06 167.20 4254.36 RM18 07/07/20 165.91 4255.65
RM18 09/19/06 164.80 4256.76 RM18 10/04/20 166.15 4255.41
RM18 12/08/06 168.90 4252.66 RM18 01/22/21 166.10 4255.46
RM18 12/08/06 168.90 4252.66 RM18 04/01/21 165.90 4255.66
RM18 03/10/07 161.10 4260.46 RM18 07/09/21 166.10 4255.46
RM18 06/24/07 164.50 4257.06 RM18 10/03/21 166.18 4255.38
RM18 08/31/07 159.30 4262.26 RM18 02/05/22 166.23 4255.33
RM18 12/03/07 164.76 4256.80 RM18 04/02/22 165.90 4255.66
RM18 03/25/08 164.70 4256.86 RM18 07/09/22 166.00 4255.56
RM18 06/29/08 165.50 4256.06 RM18 10/16/22 166.00 4255.56
RM18 09/23/08 165.58 4255.98 RM18 03/11/23 166.00 4255.56
RM18 12/16/08 165.30 4256.26 RM18 04/22/23 166.20 4255.36
RM18 02/09/09 165.20 4256.36 RM18 07/15/23 165.90 4255.66
RM18 04/12/09 165.35 4256.21 RM18 11/05/23 166.30 4255.26
RM18 08/24/09 165.60 4255.96
RM18 09/29/09 165.50 4256.06
RM18 10/18/09 165.60 4255.96
RM18 02/01/10 165.65 4255.91
RM18 03/22/10 165.60 4255.96
RM18 04/12/10 165.10 4256.46
RM18 08/17/10 165.52 4256.04
RM18 10/18/10 165.80 4255.76
RM18 01/24/11 165.90 4255.66
RM18 04/11/11 165.75 4255.81
RM18 07/25/11 166.00 4255.56
RM18 10/17/11 165.90 4255.66
RM18 02/13/12 166.00 4255.56
RM18 04/30/12 165.80 4255.76
RM18 07/23/12 166.00 4255.56
RM18 10/01/12 166.00 4255.56
RM18 02/19/13 165.80 4255.76
RM18 05/21/13 166.00 4255.56
RM18 07/15/13 166.00 4255.56
RM18 11/04/13 166.12 4255.44
RM18 02/24/14 166.10 4255.46
RM18 04/28/14 166.00 4255.56
RM18 07/21/14 166.30 4255.26
RM18 10/27/14 166.20 4255.36
RM18 02/23/15 166.20 4255.36
RM18 05/11/15 166.00 4255.56
RM18 08/10/15 166.30 4255.26
RM18 10/19/15 166.22 4255.34
RM18 03/07/16 166.30 4255.26
RM18 04/29/16 165.75 4255.81
RM18 08/04/16 166.03 4255.53
RM18 10/18/16 165.82 4255.74
Table 3-1 - Water Level Elevations
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Location
Name Date Depth to GW
Elev GW
Measured Location Name Date Depth to GW
Elev GW
Measured
RM19 11/04/03 152.60 4256.90 RM19 07/17/17 154.20 4255.30
RM19 11/12/03 152.76 4256.74 RM19 10/30/17 154.00 4255.50
RM19 11/30/03 151.70 4257.80 RM19 02/19/18 153.50 4256.00
RM19 03/22/04 150.40 4259.10 RM19 04/23/18 154.00 4255.50
RM19 06/16/04 152.32 4257.18 RM19 07/09/18 154.30 4255.20
RM19 09/21/04 152.52 4256.98 RM19 10/08/18 153.90 4255.6
RM19 11/01/04 152.30 4257.20 RM19 01/26/19 154.30 4255.20
RM19 03/20/05 153.20 4256.30 RM19 04/28/19 154.10 4255.40
RM19 06/12/05 152.10 4257.40 RM19 07/01/19 154.40 4255.10
RM19 09/11/05 151.30 4258.20 RM19 11/04/19 154.15 4255.35
RM19 12/12/05 150.80 4258.70 RM19 02/16/20 154.20 4255.30
RM19 03/11/06 151.70 4257.80 RM19 05/24/20 154.15 4255.35
RM19 06/11/06 151.50 4258.00 RM19 07/07/20 154.12 4255.38
RM19 09/19/06 152.90 4256.60 RM19 10/04/20 154.30 4255.20
RM19 12/09/06 152.90 4256.60 RM19 01/22/21 153.30 4256.20
RM19 03/10/07 152.20 4257.30 RM19 04/01/21 154.10 4255.40
RM19 06/24/07 152.60 4256.90 RM19 07/09/21 154.30 4255.20
RM19 08/31/07 152.40 4257.10 RM19 10/03/21 154.35 4255.15
RM19 12/03/07 153.15 4256.35 RM19 02/05/22 154.40 4255.10
RM19 03/25/08 153.50 4256.00 RM19 04/02/22 154.11 4255.39
RM19 06/29/08 153.70 4255.80 RM19 07/09/22 154.19 4255.31
RM19 09/23/08 153.75 4255.75 RM19 10/16/22 154.10 4255.40
RM19 12/16/08 153.42 4256.08 RM19 03/11/23 154.10 4255.40
RM19 02/09/09 153.40 4256.10 RM19 04/22/23 154.37 4255.13
RM19 04/12/09 153.63 4255.87 RM19 07/15/23 154.00 4255.50
RM19 08/24/09 153.80 4255.70 RM19 11/05/23 154.45 4255.05
RM19 09/29/09 153.80 4255.70
RM19 10/18/09 153.90 4255.60
RM19 02/01/10 153.80 4255.70
RM19 03/22/10 153.70 4255.80
RM19 04/12/10 153.20 4256.30
RM19 08/17/10 153.85 4255.65
RM19 08/30/10 153.85 4255.65
RM19 10/18/10 153.94 4255.56
RM19 01/24/11 154.00 4255.50
RM19 04/11/11 153.75 4255.75
RM19 07/25/11 154.00 4255.50
RM19 10/17/11 154.20 4255.30
RM19 02/13/12 154.20 4255.30
RM19 04/30/12 153.95 4255.55
RM19 07/23/12 154.20 4255.30
RM19 10/01/12 154.03 4255.47
RM19 02/19/13 153.80 4255.70
RM19 05/21/13 154.10 4255.40
RM19 07/15/13 154.20 4255.30
RM19 11/04/13 154.28 4255.22
RM19 02/24/14 154.25 4255.25
RM19 04/28/14 154.30 4255.20
RM19 07/21/14 154.30 4255.20
RM19 10/27/14 154.40 4255.10
RM19 02/23/15 154.40 4255.10
RM19 05/11/15 154.20 4255.30
RM19 08/10/15 154.40 4255.10
RM19 10/19/15 154.30 4255.20
RM19 03/07/16 154.36 4255.14
RM19 04/29/16 153.85 4255.65
RM19 08/04/16 153.30 4256.20
RM19 10/18/16 153.98 4255.52
RM19 02/14/17 154.20 4255.30
RM19 05/02/17 153.80 4255.70
Table 3-1 - Water Level Elevations
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Location
Name Date Depth to GW
Elev GW
Measured Location Name Date Depth to GW
Elev GW
Measured
RM20 11/03/03 129.20 4251.63 RM20 03/07/16 132.90 4247.93
RM20 11/12/03 129.90 4250.93 RM20 04/29/16 132.05 4248.78
RM20 11/30/03 129.20 4251.63 RM20 08/04/16 132.35 4248.48
RM20 03/23/04 131.09 4249.74 RM20 10/18/16 132.02 4248.81
RM20 06/16/04 129.90 4250.93 RM20 02/15/17 132.22 4248.61
RM20 09/21/04 130.00 4250.83 RM20 05/02/17 131.83 4249.00
RM20 11/07/04 129.70 4251.13 RM20 07/18/17 132.20 4248.63
RM20 03/20/05 130.00 4250.83 RM20 10/31/17 132.10 4248.73
RM20 06/12/05 131.30 4249.53 RM20 02/20/18 131.90 4248.93
RM20 09/11/05 130.60 4250.23 RM20 04/23/18 132.00 4248.83
RM20 12/13/05 130.10 4250.73 RM20 07/09/18 132.22 4248.61
RM20 03/11/06 130.70 4250.13 RM20 10/09/18 132.00 4248.83
RM20 06/11/06 130.70 4250.13 RM20 01/26/19 132.30 4248.53
RM20 09/20/06 130.80 4250.03 RM20 04/28/19 132.10 4248.73
RM20 12/08/06 130.90 4249.93 RM20 07/01/19 132.40 4248.43
RM20 03/10/07 130.10 4250.73 RM20 11/04/19 132.18 4248.65
RM20 06/24/07 130.10 4250.73 RM20 02/16/20 132.12 4248.71
RM20 08/31/07 130.50 4250.33 RM20 05/24/20 132.05 4248.78
RM20 12/04/07 131.20 4249.63 RM20 07/07/20 132.00 4248.83
RM20 03/26/08 131.50 4249.33 RM20 10/04/20 132.30 4248.53
RM20 06/30/08 131.90 4248.93 RM20 01/22/21 132.30 4248.53
RM20 09/23/08 131.68 4249.15 RM20 04/01/21 132.00 4248.83
RM20 12/15/08 131.57 4249.26 RM20 07/09/21 132.25 4248.58
RM20 02/09/09 131.30 4249.53 RM20 10/03/21 132.30 4248.53
RM20 04/13/09 131.65 4249.18 RM20 02/05/22 132.35 4248.48
RM20 08/24/09 131.70 4249.13 RM20 04/02/22 132.05 4248.78
RM20 10/18/09 131.80 4249.03 RM20 07/09/22 132.50 4248.33
RM20 02/01/10 131.82 4249.01 RM20 10/15/22 132.15 4248.68
RM20 03/22/10 131.75 4249.08 RM20 03/10/23 132.12 4248.71
RM20 04/12/10 131.20 4249.63 RM20 04/22/23 132.31 4248.52
RM20 08/17/10 131.93 4248.90 RM20 07/15/23 132.15 4248.68
RM20 10/18/10 132.00 4248.83 RM20 11/05/23 132.46 4248.37
RM20 01/24/11 131.20 4249.63
RM20 04/11/11 131.90 4248.93
RM20 07/25/11 132.00 4248.83
RM20 10/17/11 132.30 4248.53
RM20 02/13/12 132.31 4248.52
RM20 04/30/12 132.00 4248.83
RM20 07/23/12 132.30 4248.53
RM20 10/01/12 132.25 4248.58
RM20 07/23/12 132.30 4248.53
RM20 10/01/12 132.25 4248.58
RM20 02/19/13 132.00 4248.83
RM20 05/21/13 132.30 4248.53
RM20 07/15/13 132.35 4248.48
RM20 11/04/13 132.45 4248.38
RM20 02/24/14 132.40 4248.43
RM20 04/28/14 132.50 4248.33
RM20 07/21/14 132.45 4248.38
RM20 10/27/14 132.60 4248.23
RM20 02/23/15 132.60 4248.23
RM20 05/11/15 132.40 4248.43
RM20 08/10/15 132.60 4248.23
RM20 10/19/15 132.40 4248.43
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Table 3-2 - Shootaring Canyon Mill Well and Piezometer Data
Location
Name
RM1 Entrada Well 59306.43 61826.64 3 487 2.2 4449.2 220-480 157-487 225 Active and
Required
RM2R Entrada Well 57924 63142 5 300 1.2 4504.86 250-300 242-300 273 Active and
Required
RM7 Entrada Well 57903.76 61645.1 3 219.5 2.2 4395.83 187-217 177-217 200 Active and
Required
RM8 Perched Well 57204.11 61576.04 3 79.1 3.1 4381.04 57-77 47-77 75 Active
RM12 Entrada Well 59477.15 61790.93 5 157 1.3 4415.95 117-157 110-157 156 Active and
Required
RM14 Entrada Well 58418.52 61368.27 5 260 1.5 4450.84 134-174 , 174-
260#127-174 253 Active and
Required
RM18 Entrada Well 57833 61851 5 243.3 1.3 4421.56 162-242 149-242 232 Active and
Required
RM19 Entrada Well 58077 61524 5 236.3 1.3 4409.5 155-235 139-235 219 Active and
Required
RM20 Entrada Well 57208 61592 5 212.6 1.6 4380.83 131-211 120-212 201 Active
OW1A Entrada Well 57140 63730 1 300 0.2 4472.53 200-300 --Active
OW1B Navajo Well 57140 63730 1 798 1.9 4474.23 648-798 --Active
OW2 Entrada Well 57094.27 63667.32 1 300 0.2 4470.7 200-300 --Active
OW3 Navajo Well 57046.22 63658.61 1 798 2.3 4470.78 650-798 --Active
OW4 Carmel Well 57034.72 63707.25 1 570 2.3 4472.54 435-570 --Active
RM10 Entrada Well 56286.28 61272.24 5 99 2 4343.57 57-97 53-97 -Abandoned
RM11 Entrada Well 56593.76 60769.08 5 240 2 4436.14 140-180, 180-
240# 5-180 220 Abandoned
RM13 Entrada Well 56648.42 61996.28 5 270 2 4434.81 140-180 , 180-
270# 5-180 219 Abandoned
RM15 Entrada Well 56311.1 61354.62 5 460 1.9 4343.75 379-459 95-459 157 Abandoned
RM16 Entrada Well 56615 60772 5 296 1.2 4434.95 246-296 240-296 225 Abandoned
RM17 Entrada Well 56636 61993 5 290 0.7 4433.58 240-290 235-290 218 Abandoned
RM2 Entrada Well 57731.05 63040.65 3 520 1.6 4519.76 260-520 250-520 -Abandoned
RM21 Perched Well 57843 61851 5 141.3 1.3 4421.64 110-140 100-140 -Active
RM22 Perched Well 58088 61513 5 120.8 0.8 4410.52 90-120 80-120 -Active
RM3 Entrada Well 57193.11 60647.72 6 540 1.8 4461.32 230-540 190-540 246 Abandoned
RM4 Entrada Well 56471.66 61099.33 3 500 3.5 4395.5 190-490 115-500 176 Abandoned
RM4R Entrada Well 56358 61086 5 160 1 4368.32 110-160 105-160 157 Abandoned
RM5 Entrada Well 56415.41 61285.98 3 440 3.6 4379.12 150-430 130-440 172 Abandoned
RM6 Entrada Well 56348.02 61480.76 3 460 2.3 4374.57 175-455 110-460 174 Abandoned
RM9 Perched Well 56767.27 61363.68 3 82.8 1.2 4369.25 62-82 52-82 80 Abandoned
WW1 Navajo Well 56562.11 63085.99 6 870 -2.8 4454.79 635-870 --Active
WW2 Navajo Well 57144.07 63676.73 6 1000 -3.4 4471.67 602-1000 --Active
T4 Tailings Wells 58456 61953 2 20 1.2 4431.2 12.9-17.9 18-Oct -Active
T5 Tailings Wells 58371 61891 2 10 2.5 4425 2.5-7.5 0.7-8 -Active
T6 Tailings Wells 58133 61801 2 11.7 2.9 4429 3.8-8.8 9-Jan -Active
PZ1 Piezometer 56598.62 61021.6 1 87 1.8 4434.51 75-85 Feb-85 -Active
PZ2 Piezometer 56579.87 61326.68 1 88 1.7 4434.74 76-86 Mar-86 -Active
PZ3 Piezometer 56563.65 61575.24 1 88 1.9 4435.34 76-86 Mar-86 -Active
PZ4 Piezometer 56270.81 61382.9 1 25 1.7 4347.17 13-23 23-Feb -Abandoned
PZ5 Piezometer 56300.79 61274.63 1 25 1.8 4344.79 13-23 23-Jan -Abandoned
PZ6 Piezometer 56331.92 61166.86 1 25 1.6 4362.51 13-23 23-Feb -Abandoned
1 Well locations are in local site corrdinates 2 Depths are feet below ground surface
M.S.L. = Mean Sea Level
Formation & Well
Type Northing1 Easting1
Casing Inside
Diameter
(inches)
Total Well
Depth
(feet2)
Top of Casing
Reference elev.
(feet M.S.L.)
Casing Screen
Depth
Interval
(feet2)
Sand Pack
Depth
Interval
(feet2)
Pump Intake
Dpeth
(feet2 )
StatusStick Up
(feet)
Shootaring Canyon Mill
Table 4-1 - Calculated Vertical Gradient Between Wells RM8 and RM20
Well No.
Top of Casing Elevation (ft., MSL)4381.77 4380.83
Casing Stick up (ft., ags)3.1 1.6
Screen Zone (ft., bgs)57 - 77 131-211
Vertical Well Screen Separation (ft.)104 (The difference between the mid-point of each screen zone)
Date
Depth to Water
(ft, bTOC)
Water Elevation
(ft, MSL)
Depth to
Water
(ft, bTOC)
Water
Elevation
(ft, MSL)
Vertical Gradient
(ft/ft)
11/12/03 58.25 4323.52 129.9 4250.93 0.689
11/30/03 56.8 4324.97 129.2 4251.63 0.696
03/23/04 58.4 4323.37 131.09 4249.74 0.699
06/16/04 57.8 4323.97 129.9 4250.93 0.693
09/21/04 58 4323.77 130.0 4250.83 0.692
11/07/04 58.1 4323.67 129.7 4251.13 0.688
03/20/05 57.9 4323.87 130.0 4250.83 0.693
06/12/05 57.9 4323.87 131.3 4249.53 0.706
09/11/05 58 4323.77 130.6 4250.23 0.698
12/13/05 57.8 4323.97 130.1 4250.73 0.695
03/11/06 57.9 4323.87 130.7 4250.13 0.700
06/11/06 57.4 4324.37 130.7 4250.13 0.705
09/20/06 57.8 4323.97 130.8 4250.03 0.702
12/08/06 58.4 4323.37 130.9 4249.93 0.697
03/10/07 56.9 4324.87 130.1 4250.73 0.704
06/25/07 56.5 4325.27 130.1 4250.73 0.708
08/31/07 57.2 4324.57 130.5 4250.33 0.705
12/04/07 57.45 4324.32 131.2 4249.63 0.709
03/26/08 56.95 4324.82 131.50 4249.33 0.717
06/30/08 57.20 4324.57 131.9 4248.93 0.718
09/24/08 57.88 4323.89 131.68 4249.15 0.710
12/15/08 57.33 4324.44 131.57 4249.26 0.714
02/09/09 57.05 4324.72 131.30 4249.53 0.714
04/13/09 56.79 4324.98 131.65 4249.18 0.720
08/24/09 57.17 4324.60 131.70 4249.13 0.717
10/18/09 57.15 4324.62 131.80 4249.03 0.718
02/01/10 56.40 4325.37 131.82 4249.01 0.725
04/12/10 56.20 4325.57 131.20 4249.63 0.721
06/21/10 56.80 4324.97 131.90 4248.93 0.722
08/17/10 56.60 4325.17 131.93 4248.90 0.724
08/30/10 56.60 4325.17 131.93 4248.90 0.724
10/18/10 56.55 4325.22 132.00 4248.83 0.725
01/24/11 56.00 4325.77 131.20 4249.63 0.723
04/11/11 55.90 4325.87 131.90 4248.93 0.731
07/25/11 55.80 4325.97 132.00 4248.83 0.733
10/17/11 56.38 4325.39 132.00 4248.83 0.727
02/23/12 55.40 4326.37 132.00 4248.83 0.737
04/30/12 55.65 4326.12 132.31 4248.52 0.737
07/23/12 55.45 4326.32 132.30 4248.53 0.739
10/01/12 55.82 4325.95 132.25 4248.58 0.735
02/19/13 54.80 4326.97 132.00 4248.83 0.742
05/13/13 55.00 4326.77 132.30 4248.53 0.743
07/15/13 54.90 4326.87 132.35 4248.48 0.745
11/04/13 54.90 4326.87 132.45 4248.38 0.746
02/24/14 54.70 4327.07 132.40 4248.43 0.747
04/28/14 54.70 4327.07 132.50 4248.33 0.748
07/21/14 54.50 4327.27 132.45 4248.38 0.750
10/27/14 54.50 4327.27 132.60 4248.23 0.751
02/23/15 54.20 4327.57 132.60 4248.23 0.754
05/11/15 54.00 4327.77 132.40 4248.43 0.754
08/10/15 54.00 4327.77 132.60 4248.23 0.756
10/19/15 54.10 4327.67 132.40 4248.43 0.753
03/07/16 54.30 4327.47 132.90 4247.93 0.756
04/29/16 53.45 4328.32 132.05 4248.78 0.756
08/04/16 53.75 4328.02 132.35 4248.48 0.756
10/18/16 53.40 4328.37 132.02 4248.81 0.756
02/15/17 54.40 4327.37 132.22 4248.61 0.748
05/02/17 53.39 4328.38 131.83 4249.00 0.754
07/18/17 54.19 4327.58 132.20 4248.63 0.750
10/31/17 53.95 4327.82 132.10 4248.73 0.751
02/20/18 54.00 4327.77 131.90 4248.93 0.749
04/23/18 54.15 4327.62 132.00 4248.83 0.749
07/09/18 54.31 4327.46 132.22 4248.61 0.749
10/09/18 53.40 4328.37 132.00 4248.83 0.756
01/26/19 54.15 4327.62 132.30 4248.53 0.751
04/28/19 53.55 4328.22 132.10 4248.73 0.755
07/28/19 54.20 4327.57 132.40 4248.43 0.752
11/03/19 53.50 4328.27 132.18 4248.65 0.757
02/16/20 53.27 4328.50 132.12 4248.71 0.758
05/24/20 53.43 4328.34 132.05 4248.78 0.756
07/07/20 53.88 4327.89 132.00 4248.83 0.751
10/04/20 54.00 4327.77 132.30 4248.53 0.753
01/22/21 54.00 4327.77 132.30 4248.53 0.753
04/01/21 53.95 4327.82 132.00 4248.83 0.750
07/09/21 54.10 4327.67 132.25 4248.58 0.751
10/03/21 54.18 4327.59 132.30 4248.53 0.751
02/05/22 54.20 4327.57 132.35 4248.48 0.751
04/02/22 53.90 4327.87 132.05 4248.78 0.751
07/09/22 53.92 4327.85 132.50 4248.33 0.756
10/16/22 53.25 4328.52 132.15 4248.68 0.759
03/10/23 53.50 4328.27 132.12 4248.71 0.756
04/22/23 54.40 4327.37 132.31 4248.52 0.749
07/15/23 53.42 4328.35 132.15 4248.68 0.757
11/05/23 54.52 4327.25 132.46 4248.37 0.749
RM8 RM20
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
AR
HC

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report - 2023
February 2024

FIGURES
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: FEBRUARY 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 1-1
Location of Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
PZ3
PZ2
PZ1
PZ4PZ5
PZ6
RM
1
RM2
R
M
3
R
M
4
R
M
5
R
M
6
RM
7
RM
8
RM9
R
M
1
0
R
M
1
1
RM
1
2
R
M
1
3
RM
1
4
R
M
1
5
OW
3
O
W
4
WW
1
OW
2
OW
1
B
OW
1
A
950
'
WW
2
580'
SCALE: 1"=250'
MILL
OFFICE
RM17
RM4R
RM16
RM
2
R
CROSS VALLEY BERM
SHOO
T
A
R
I
N
G

D
A
M
RM
1
9
RM
1
8
RM
2
1
RM
2
2
RM
2
0
(AFTER HYDRO-ENGINEERING, 1998)
RM1
RM8
PZ1-PZ3
ENTRADA WELL
PERCHED WATER ZONE WELL
DAM PIEZOMETER
OW3
OW4 CARMEL WELL
NAVAJO WELL
--LEGEND--
ABANDONED WELL (NAME UNDERLINED)RM10RM9
1'
3
2
2'
3'
1
LIMITS OF EXISTING
TAILINGS
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
FIGURE 1-2
LOCATION OF WELLS AND GEOLOGIC
CROSS SECTIONS
PROJECT:
DATE:
FILE:
ANFIELD
FEBRUARY 2024
2024-01-Basemap
?
2000 600400400
300
1
200
100
RM11
NEUTRON (API)
9000
0
27001800
100
300
200
CARMEL FORMATION
400
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
?
4000 200
400 600
300
200
100
NEUTRON (API)
18000 900
0
2700
400
0 200 400 600
2000 400600
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
300
200
1800
NEUTRON (API)
WELL RM150
900
700
WELL RM5
NEUTRON (API)
0 900 1800 2700
100
0
2700
ENTRADA SANDSTONE
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
6000 200 400
400
300
200
100
900
NEUTRON (API)
0
0 27001800
1'
?
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
WELL
RM16WELL
RM4WELL RM4RWELL
RM6WELL
RM13WELL
RM17WELL
(OFFSET)
400
300
200
100
0
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
0 700350
0 2700
1700SANDSTONE
LOWER K
SANDSTONE
LOWER K
4200
3950
4000
3900
4150
4050
4100
4300
4350
4250
4500
4400
4450
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
,

F
T
-
M
S
L
4240.35 4251.44 4239.724239.70 4238.82 4236.05 4238.07 4245.214243.58
ABANDONED WELL DATA (12/03)
(AFTER HYDRO-ENGINEERING, 1998)
EXISTING LAND SURFACE
WELL DEPTH PRIOR
DEEPENING IN 1999
WELL LOCATION, TOTAL DEPTH, AND
SLOTTED OR OPEN HOLE INTERVAL
?
?
ANFIELD RESOURCES INC.
FIGURE 3-1
GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION 1-1'
PROJECT:
DATE:
FILE:
ANFIELD
FEBRUARY 202
2023-11-XSECT-FIGS
WELL RM2
4200
3950
4000
3900
4150
4050
4100
0400
300
600200 400
NEUTRON (API)
WELL RM3
4300
4350
4250
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
200
100
2
4500
4400
4450 0
0 2700900 1800
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
6004000 200 400
300
200
2700
WELL RM7
100
NEUTRON (API)
0
0 900 1800
2000400 600400
300
200
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
NEUTRON (API)
100
900
0
0 27001800
2'
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
,

F
T
-
M
S
L
ENTRADA SANDSTONE
CARMEL FORMATION
EXISITNG LAND SURFACE
WELL
RM2R
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
6004000 200 400
300
200
2700
WELL RM18
100
NEUTRON (API)
0
0 900 1800
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
6004000 200 400
300
200
2700
WELL RM19
100
NEUTRON (API)
0
0 900 1800
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
6004000 200 400
300
200
2700
WELL RM14
100
NEUTRON (API)
0
0 900 1800
4246.52
4256.94
4255.05 4255.26 4261.37
ABANDONED WELL DATA (12/03)
ACTIVE AND MONITORED WELL DATA (10/21)
(AFTER HYDRO-ENGINEERING, 1998)
4260.26
NOTE:
WELLS RM20 AND RM21 ADJACENT TO WELLS RM18 AND RM19
DO NOT SHOW ANY SATURATION IN THE UPPER ENTRADA
ABOVE THE ENTRADA WATER TABLE.
TOP OF CLAY LINER
BELOW TAILINGS
WELL LOCATION, TOTAL DEPTH, AND
SLOTTED OR OPEN HOLE INTERVAL
?
?
?
?
?
?
??
?
?
LOWER K
SANDSTONE
LOWER K
SANDSTONELOWER K
SANDSTONE
?
??
4253.49
ANFIELD RESOURCES INC.
FIGURE 3-2
GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION 2-2'
PROJECT:
DATE:
FILE:
181692
)(%58$5<
2023-11-XSECT-FIGS
CARMEL FORMATION
ENTRADA SANDSTONE
SANDSTONE
LOWER K
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
400 0
200
300
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
200 400 600
400
?200
300
NEUTRON (API)
900
WELL RM15
100
0
0
3
1800 2700
0
100
6004002000
?
18009000 2700
WELL RM9
NEUTRON (API)
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
400
200
300
6000 200 400
0
100
0
NEUTRON (API)
WELL RM7
2700900 1800
ENTRADA SANDSTONE
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
300
400 0 200 400 600
NEUTRON (API)
WELL RM1
100
200
0
0 900 1800
3'
2700
?
X-VALLEY BERMSHOOTARING DAM NORTH DIKE
WELLRM12
WELL T4
WELLRM10
700 2700
7000400
300
200
100
0
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
1700
350
DE
P
T
H

(
F
E
E
T
)
6004000 200 400
300
200
2700
WELL RM20
100
NEUTRON (API)
0
0 900 1800
LOWER K SANDSTONE
4200
3950
4000
3900
4150
4050
4100
4300
4350
4250
4500
4400
4450
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
,

F
T
-
M
S
L
4271.654271.50
4253.494248.37
4308.01
4248.27 4236.05
ABANDONED WELL DATA (12/03)
ACTIVE AND MONITORED WELL DATA (10/22)
4327.25WELL RM8
(AFTER HYDRO-ENGINEERING, 1998)
NOTE:
RM8 DEFINES UPPER WATER LEVEL
ADJACENT TO RM20. WELLS RM7, RM14,
RM21 AND RM22 SHOW THAT THE UPPER
SATURATION DOES NOT EXTEND TO THESE
AREAS.
TOP OF CLAY LINER
BELOW TAILINGS
EXISTING LAND
SURFACE
WELL LOCATION, TOTAL DEPTH, AND
SLOTTED OR OPEN HOLE INTERVAL
?
??
ANFIELD RESOURCES INC.
FIGURE 3-3
GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION 3-3'
PROJECT:
DATE:
FILE:
181692
)(%58$5<
2023-11-XSECT-FIGS
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: FEBRUARY 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-4
Time Series of Measured Groundwater Elevations
4271.50
4260.26
4256.94
4255.264253.49
4255.05
PZ1
PZ4PZ5
PZ6
RM1
RM3
RM4 RM5 RM6
RM7
RM10RM11
RM12
RM13
RM14
RM15
RM17
RM4R
RM16
RM19
RM18
RM21RM22
4271.65
<4289.7 <4280.3
MILL
AREA
CROSS VALLEY
BERM
NORTH
CELL
MAIN
TAILINGS
DAM
SOUTH
CELL
PZ2
PZ3RM9
4327.25
4248.68RM8RM20
EXISTING TAILINGS
DISPOSAL CELL
4305 4
3
0
0
42
9
5
42
9
0
4
3
1
5
43
1
0
4
3
0
5
4
3
0
0
42854280
RM2
RM2R
4270
4265
4260
4255
4250
4245
4260
4260.26 MILL
AREA
OW3 OW4
WW1
OW2
OW1B
OW1A
4234.2
4250.6 (1/16/04)
RM2
RM2R
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
FIGURE 3-5
WATER-LEVEL ELEVATION IN THE PERCHED
WATER ZONE AND ENTRADA AQUIFER,
NOVEMBER 2023
PROJECT:
DATE:
FILE:
ANFIELD
FEBRUARY 2024
2024-01-Basemap
SCALE: 1"=250'
(AFTER HYDRO-ENGINEERING, 1998)
--LEGEND--
4254.22
4325.95
NOTE:
WATER-LEVEL ELEVATION FOR THE MAIN
ENTRADA AQUIFER IN THIS SOUTHERN
AREA IS BASED ON 2003 DATA.
WATER-LEVEL ELEVATION IN FEET-msl
PERCHED WATER ZONE
ENTRADA PIEZOMETRIC SURFACE
PERCHED WATER ZONE PIEZOMETRIC SURFACE
RM1
RM8
PZ3
ENTRADA WELL
PERCHED WATER ZONE WELL
DAM PIEZOMETER
OW3
OW4 CARMEL WELL
NAVAJO WELL
0 200 400
Scale 1" = 400'
INSET
T5
T4
T6
SUMP
T5 TAILINGS WELLS
LEGEND
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
FIGURE 3-6
LOCATION OF TAILINGS WELLS AND
UNDERDRAIN PIPING AND SUMP
NORTH
PROJECT:
DATE:
FILE:
Anfield
FEBRUARY 2024
2023-11-FIG-3-6.DWG
UNDERDRAIN
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: FEBRUARY 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 3-7
Location of Drainage Area and Existing Tailings Cell
3433
34
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
APPROXIMATE
DRAINAGE AREA
TO CROSS VALLEY
BERM
EXISTING TAILINGS
CROSS
VALLEY
BERM
MILL
SITE
SHOOTARING
DAM
4800
4600
460
0
4400
460
0
4400
4600
440
0
4600
4800
4600
460
0
44
0
0
460
0
48
0
0
48
0
0
FIGURE 3-7
LOCATION OF DRAINAGE AREA AND EXISTING
TAILINGS CELL
NORTH
DECEMBER 2018
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
PROJECT:
DATE: FEBRUARY 2024
FILE:
FIGURE 4-1
WATER LEVELS AND CALCULATED VERTICAL
GRADIENTS BETWEEN WELLS RM8 AND RM20
8.18
7.93
35
17
14
270
6
240
Cl mg/l
TDS mg/l SO4 mg/l
pH std. units -field
7.91
20
10
240
PZ3
PZ2
PZ1
P
Z
4
PZ5
P
Z
6
RM
1
RM2
R
M
3
RM4
RM5 R
M
6
RM
7
RM
8
RM9
RM10
R
M
1
1
RM
1
2
R
M
1
3
RM
1
4
R
M
1
5
OW
3
O
W
4
WW
1
OW
2
OW
1
B
OW
1
A
950'
WW
2
580'
SCALE: 1"=250'
MILL
OFFICE
RM17
RM4R
RM16
RM
2
R
RM1
RM8
PZ1-PZ3
ENTRADA WELL
PERCHED WATER ZONE WELL
DAM PIEZOMETER
OW3
OW4 CARMEL WELL
NAVAJO WELL
--LEGEND--
CROSS VALLEY BERM
SHOO
T
A
R
I
N
G

D
A
M
RM
1
9
RM
1
8
RM
2
1
RM
2
2
RM
2
0 7.831023047
7.996250207.98521018
7.74530018
7.98726023
8.0860590151
LIMITS OF EXISTING
TAILINGS
(AFTER HYDRO-ENGINEERING, 1998)

ABANDONED WELL (NAME UNDERLINED)RM10RM9
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
FIGURE 5-1
CONCENTRATIONS OF TDS, SULFATE,
CHLORIDE AND FIELD pH IN THE ENTRADA
AQUIFER AND PERCHED WATER ZONE,
NOVEMBER 2023
PROJECT:
DATE:
FILE:
ANFIELD
FEBRUARY 2024
2024-01-Basemap
As mg/L
Cr mg/L Se mg/L
Ba mg/L
<0.003
<0.01
<0.1
<0.005
<0.01
<0.003
<0.005
<0.1
<0.1
<0.01
<0.003
0.006<0.010.008 0.1
<0.003
<0.01
<0.1
<0.005
<0.003
<0.01
<0.003
<0.01
<0.1
<0.005
<0.1
<0.005
PZ3
PZ2
PZ1
PZ4P
Z
5
PZ6
RM
1
R
M
2
R
M
3
RM4
RM5 RM6
RM
7
RM
8
R
M
9
R
M
1
0
RM11
RM
1
2
RM13
RM
1
4
RM15
OW
3
O
W
4
WW
1
OW
2
OW
1
B
OW
1
A
950'
WW
2
580'
SCALE: 1"=250'
MILL
OFFICE
R
M
1
7
R
M
4
R
R
M
1
6
RM
2
R
CROSS VALLEY BERM
SHOO
T
A
R
I
N
G

D
A
M
RM
1
9
RM
1
8
RM
2
1
RM
2
2
RM
2
0
0.006<0.010.019 <0.1
<0.005<0.01<0.003 <0.1

(AFTER HYDRO-ENGINEERING, 1998)
RM1
RM8
PZ1-PZ3
ENTRADA WELL
PERCHED WATER ZONE WELL
DAM PIEZOMETER
OW3
OW4 CARMEL WELL
NAVAJO WELL
--LEGEND--
ABANDONED WELL (NAME UNDERLINED)RM10RM9
<0.005
LIMITS OF EXISTING
TAILINGS
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
FIGURE 5-2
CONCENTRATIONS OF TRACE METALS
ARSENIC, BARIUM, CHROMIUM & SELENIUM
IN THE ENTRADA AQUIFER AND PERCHED
WATER ZONE, NOVEMBER 2023
PROJECT:
DATE:
FILE:
ANFIELD
FEBRUARY 2024
2024-01-Basemap
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
AR
HC

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report - 2023
February 2024

ATTACHMENT A
DOCUMENTATION OF COMMUNICATION WITH LABORATORY

ASUil,

PleaVe leW me kQRZ if WhiV ZRUkV.

If \RX haYe aQ\ TXeVWiRQV RU cRmmeQWV, SleaVe cRQWacW me.

ThaQkV,

Tom Patten
GHQHUaO MaQaJHU _ PacH W\RPLQJ
1673 THUUa AYH, SKHULdaQ, WY 82801
R: 307.461.4987 _ P: 307.751.0325 _ SacHOabV.cRP

From: DSULO WZULJKWLQF.FRP <[e-mail]>
Sent: :HGQHVGD\, AXJXVW 2, 2023 4:52 PM
To: 7RP PDWWHQ <[e-mail]>
Cc: LDML\D MRUULOO <ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP>; SKHU\O GDUOLQJ <[e-mail]]>
Subject: FZ: FLQDO ANFIELDS2303166
¬
TRP,
¬
TKLV ZRUNRUdHU LV PLVVLQJ WKH QC VHcWLRQ.¬ WRXOd \RX SOHaVH UHVHQd LW?
¬
TKaQNV
ASULO
¬
¬
¬
ASULO LaIIHUW\
WULJKW EQYLURQPHQWaO SHUYLcHV, IQc.
226 PHWHUVRQ SWUHHW
FRUW CROOLQV, CO 80525
[e-mail]
970-430-9001
¬
¬
From: DSULO WZULJKWLQF.FRP <[e-mail]>
Sent: :HGQHVGD\, AXJXVW 2, 2023 4:49 PM
To: :DGH NLHXZVPD <:[e-mail]>; VDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>
Cc: UDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>; ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP <ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP>
Subject: RH: FLQDO ANFIELDS2303166
¬
WadH,
¬
TKLV ZRUNRUdHU LV PLVVLQJ WKH QC VHcWLRQ.¬ WRXOd \RX SOHaVH UHVHQd LW?
¬
TKaQNV
ASULO
¬
¬
¬
ASULO LaIIHUW\
WULJKW EQYLURQPHQWaO SHUYLcHV, IQc.
226 PHWHUVRQ SWUHHW
FRUW CROOLQV, CO 80525
[e-mail]
970-430-9001
From: :DGH NLHXZVPD <:[e-mail]>
Sent: 7KXUVGD\, MD\ 25, 2023 5:08 PM
To: DSULO WZULJKWLQF.FRP <[e-mail]>; VDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>
Cc: UDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>; ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP <ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP>
Subject: FLQDO ANFIELDS2303166
¬
¬
¬

Wade Nieuwsma
[e-mail]
LabRUaWRU\ OSHUaWLRQV MaQaJHU/RadLRcKHPLVWU\ SXSHUYLVRU
1673 THUUa AYHQXH, SKHULdaQ, WY 82801
Oab: 307.672.8945 _ dLUHcW: 307.461.4985 _ SacHOabV.cRP
¬
From: DSULO WZULJKWLQF.FRP <[e-mail]>
Sent: 7KXUVGD\, MD\ 25, 2023 8:47 AM
To: :DGH NLHXZVPD <:[e-mail]>; VDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>
Cc: UDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>
Subject: RH: AQÀHOG 1VW QWU G: SDPSOH SHW S2303166
¬
WadH,
¬
POHaVH UHSRUW bRWK aQaO\VHV.¬
¬
TKaQNV
ASULO
¬
¬
From: :DGH NLHXZVPD <:[e-mail]>
Sent: :HGQHVGD\, MD\ 24, 2023 8:50 AM
To: VDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>
Cc: UDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>; DSULO WZULJKWLQF.FRP <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: AQÀHOG 1VW QWU G: SDPSOH SHW S2303166
¬
:DLWLQJ RQ FODULÀFDWLRQ RQ ZKDW FOXRULGH \RX ZDQW UHSRUWHG IRU RM 100
¬

Wade Nieuwsma
[e-mail]
LabRUaWRU\ OSHUaWLRQV MaQaJHU/RadLRcKHPLVWU\ SXSHUYLVRU
1673 THUUa AYHQXH, SKHULdaQ, WY 82801
Oab: 307.672.8945 _ dLUHcW: 307.461.4985 _ SacHOabV.cRP
¬
From: VDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>
Sent: 7XHVGD\, MD\ 23, 2023 7:23 PM
To: :DGH NLHXZVPD <:[e-mail]>
Cc: UDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>
Subject: AQÀHOG 1VW QWU G: SDPSOH SHW S2303166
¬
DLG D ÀQDO UHSRUW JR RXW RQ WKLV VHW?¬ 7KHUH ZDV D EXQFK RI UHFKHFNV.¬ DLG \RX JHW D UHVSRQVH UHJDUGLQJ
WKH FO UHUXQ UHVXOW?
¬
POHDVH DGYLVH.
7KDQNV,
SKHU\O
¬
SheU\O aQd RRgeU GaUOLQg
R aQd D EQWeUSULVeV, IQc.
ZZZ.UdeLQc.bL]
PO BR[ 3321
CaVSeU, WY 82602
CeOO 307.277.3861
LaQd 307.237.4188
[e-mail]]
[e-mail]]
¬
Thanks Wade,
April
From: WadH NLHXZVPa <[e-mail]>
Sent: TXHVda\, Ma\ 30, 2023 11:14 AM
To: aSULO WZULJKWLQc.cRP <[e-mail]>; VaJaUOLQJ UdHLQc.bL] <[e-mail]]>
Cc: UaJaUOLQJ UdHLQc.bL] <[e-mail]]>; OaPL\aPRUULOO@\aKRR.cRP <OaPL\aPRUULOO@\aKRR.cRP>
Subject: RE: ANFIELDS2304349
AWWacKHd LV WKH UHSRUW ZLWK WKH UHcRXQWV, VHH bHORZ.
¬
POHaVH UHYLHZ WKH aWWacKHd.
¬

Wade NieXZVma
[e-mail]
LabRUaWRU\ OSeUaWLRQV MaQageU/RadLRcKePLVWU\ SXSeUYLVRU
1673 TeUUa AYeQXe, SKeULdaQ, WY 82801
Oab: 307.672.8945 _ dLUecW: 307.461.4985 _ SaceOabV.cRP
¬
From: aSULO WZULJKWLQc.cRP <[e-mail]>
Sent: TKXUVda\, Ma\ 25, 2023 12:11 PM
To: WadH NLHXZVPa <[e-mail]>; VaJaUOLQJ UdHLQc.bL] <[e-mail]]>
Cc: UaJaUOLQJ UdHLQc.bL] <[e-mail]]>; OaPL\aPRUULOO@\aKRR.cRP
Subject: RH: ANFIELDS2304349
¬
WaGH,
¬
POHaVH UHFKHFN WKH UHVXOWV RU UHFRXQW WKH UaGLXP-226 IRU WKH IROORZLQJ VaPSOHV¬S2304349-
010,¬S2304349-001, aQG¬S2304349-002.
¬
AOVR,¬TKH FRQGLWLRQ XSRQ UHFHLSW LV QRW FRPSOHWH.¬ ¬QXHVWLRQV 3-8 aUH QRW FRPSOHWH. AQG WKH VWaII
PHPbHU FKHFNLQJ WKH VaPSOHV LQ ZaV QRW LGHQWLÀHG.
¬
AQ\ UHaVRQ WKHVH ZHUH QRW ÀQLVKHG?
¬
KLQG RHJaUGV,
¬
ASULO
¬
¬
¬
ASULO LaIIHUW\
WULJKW EQYLURQPHQWaO SHUYLFHV, IQF.
226 PHWHUVRQ SWUHHW
FRUW CROOLQV, CO 80525
[e-mail]
970-430-9001
From: WadH NLHXZVPa <[e-mail]>
Sent: TXHVda\, Ma\ 23, 2023 11:49 AM
To: VaJaUOLQJ UdHLQc.bL] <[e-mail]]>
Cc: UaJaUOLQJ UdHLQc.bL] <[e-mail]]>; OaPL\aPRUULOO@\aKRR.cRP <OaPL\aPRUULOO@\aKRR.cRP>;
aSULO WZULJKWLQc.cRP <[e-mail]>
Subject: ANFIELDS2304349
¬
FRU \RXU UHYLHZ, SOHaVH
¬

Wade NieXZVma
[e-mail]
LabRUaWRU\ OSeUaWLRQV MaQageU/RadLRcKePLVWU\ SXSeUYLVRU
1673 TeUUa AYeQXe, SKeULdaQ, WY 82801
Oab: 307.672.8945 _ dLUecW: 307.461.4985 _ SaceOabV.cRP
¬
3 PleaVe conVideU Whe enYiUonmenW befoUe pUinWing WhiV email
3 PleaVe conVideU Whe enYiUonmenW befoUe pUinWing WhiV email
Wade,
POeaVe UeaQaO\]e fOXRULde fRU VaPSOeV S2303166-011, S2303166-008, aQd S2303166-004.
KLQd ReJaUdV,
ASULO
ASULO LaffeUW\
WULJKW EQYLURQPeQWaO SeUYLceV, IQc.
226 PeWeUVRQ SWUeeW
FRUW CROOLQV, CO 80525
[e-mail]
970-430-9001
From: Wade NieuZsma <[e-mail]>
SenW: Frida\, March 17, 2023 1:05 PM
To: april tZrightinc.com <[e-mail]>; sagarling rdeinc.bi] <[e-mail]]>
Cc: ragarling rdeinc.bi] <[e-mail]]>; lami\amorrill@\ahoo.com <lami\amorrill@\ahoo.com>
SXbjecW: RE: ANFIELDS2303168
¬
¬
¬
Wade NieXZVma
[e-mail]
LabRUaWRU\ OSeUaWLRQV MaQageU/RadLRcKePLVWU\ SXSeUYLVRU
1673 TeUUa AYeQXe, SKeULdaQ, WY 82801
Oab: 307.672.8945 _ dLUecW: 307.461.4985 _ SaceOabV.cRP
¬
From: april tZrightinc.com <[e-mail]>
SenW: Frida\, March 17, 2023 12:56 PM
To: Wade NieuZsma <[e-mail]>; sagarling rdeinc.bi] <[e-mail]]>
Cc: ragarling rdeinc.bi] <[e-mail]]>; lami\amorrill@\ahoo.com
SXbjecW: Re: ANFIELDS2303168
¬
Wade,
¬
Ma\ I SleaVe haYe Whe nRnURXnded YalXeV VSUeadVheeW?
<RX DUH ZHOFRPH.
¬

Wade NieXZVma
[e-mail]
LabRUaWRU\ OSHUaWLRQV MaQaJHU/RadLRcKHPLVWU\ SXSHUYLVRU
1673 THUUa AYHQXH, SKHULdaQ, WY 82801
Oab: 307.672.8945 _ dLUHcW: 307.461.4985 _ SacHOabV.cRP
¬
From: VDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>
Sent: 7XHVGD\, SHSWHPEHU 5, 2023 5:56 PM
To: :DGH NLHXZVPD <:[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
Cc: UDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>; ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP
Subject: RH: PUHOLP ANFIELDS2307223
¬
IW ORRNV OLNH HYHU\WKLQJ LV EDFN LQ RUGHU DQG FRPSOLHV ZLWK WKH QAP.
¬
:DGH, WKDQN \RX IRU DOO \RXU HIIRUWV.
¬
GHW OXWORRN IRU AQGURLG
¬
From: :DGH NLHXZVPD <:[e-mail]>
Sent: 7XHVGD\, SHSWHPEHU 5, 2023 2:53:05 PM
To: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
Cc: VDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>; UDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>;
ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP <ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP>
Subject: RE: PUHOLP ANFIELDS2307223
¬
ASULO
¬
AWWDFKHG LV \RXU UHFRXQW GDWD.
¬
POHDVH DGYLVH
¬

Wade NieXZVma
[e-mail]
LabRUaWRU\ OSHUaWLRQV MaQaJHU/RadLRcKHPLVWU\ SXSHUYLVRU
1673 THUUa AYHQXH, SKHULdaQ, WY 82801
Oab: 307.672.8945 _ dLUHcW: 307.461.4985 _ SacHOabV.cRP
¬
From: DSULO WZULJKWLQF.FRP <[e-mail]>
Sent: MRQGD\, AXJXVW 28, 2023 2:51 PM
To: :DGH NLHXZVPD <:[e-mail]>
Cc: VDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>; UDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>;
ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP
Subject: RH: PUHOLP ANFIELDS2307223
¬
WaGH,
¬
LHWV VWaUW ZLWK a UHcRXQW aQG VHH LI aQ\WKLQJ cKaQJHV.
¬
TKaQNV
ASULO
From: :DGH NLHXZVPD <:[e-mail]>
Sent: MRQGD\, AXJXVW 28, 2023 1:35 PM
To: DSULO WZULJKWLQF.FRP <[e-mail]>
Cc: VDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>; UDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>;
ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP <ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP>
Subject: RE: PUHOLP ANFIELDS2307223
¬
RHFRXQW RU UHDQDO\]H?
¬
I ZLOO KDYH WR FKDUJH WR UHDQDO\]H.
¬

Wade NieXZVma
[e-mail]
LabRUaWRU\ OSHUaWLRQV MaQaJHU/RadLRcKHPLVWU\ SXSHUYLVRU
1673 THUUa AYHQXH, SKHULdaQ, WY 82801
Oab: 307.672.8945 _ dLUHcW: 307.461.4985 _ SacHOabV.cRP
¬
From: DSULO WZULJKWLQF.FRP <[e-mail]>
Sent: MRQGD\, AXJXVW 28, 2023 12:36 PM
To: :DGH NLHXZVPD <:[e-mail]>
Cc: VDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>; UDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>;
ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP
Subject: RH: PUHOLP ANFIELDS2307223
¬
WaGH,
¬
AcWXaOO\ bHIRUH \RX UHSRUW, ZRXOG \RX SOHaVH UHaQaO\]H WKH UaGLXP-226 IRU WKH IROORZLQJ
VaPSOHV.
¬
S2307223-001
S2307223-003
S2307223-005
S2307223-006
S2307223-010
¬
KLQG RHJaUGV,
¬
ASULO
From: DSULO WZULJKWLQF.FRP <[e-mail]>
Sent: MRQGD\, AXJXVW 28, 2023 12:27 PM
To: :DGH NLHXZVPD <:[e-mail]>
Cc: VDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>; UDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>;
ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP <ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP>
Subject: RH: PUHOLP ANFIELDS2307223
¬
WaGH,
¬
WRXOG \RX SOHaVH UHLVVXH WKH UHSRUW ZLWK WKH RULJLQaO YaOXHV aQG WKH UHcRXQW YaOXHV aQG GaWHV
SOHaVH?¬ I QHHG WR GRcXPHQW WKH UHcRXQW.
¬
KLQG RHJaUGV,
¬
ASULO
¬
¬
¬
ASULO LaIIHUW\
WULJKW EQYLURQPHQWaO SHUYLcHV, IQc.
226 PHWHUVRQ SWUHHW
FRUW CROOLQV, CO 80525
[e-mail]
970-430-9001
From: :DGH NLHXZVPD <:[e-mail]>
Sent: :HGQHVGD\, AXJXVW 23, 2023 8:25 AM
To: DSULO WZULJKWLQF.FRP <[e-mail]>
Cc: VDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>; UDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>;
ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP <ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP>
Subject: RE: PUHOLP ANFIELDS2307223
¬
RHVXOWV GLG QRW FKDQJH HQRXJK WR UHYLVH WKH ÀOH
¬

Wade NieXZVma
[e-mail]
LabRUaWRU\ OSHUaWLRQV MaQaJHU/RadLRcKHPLVWU\ SXSHUYLVRU
1673 THUUa AYHQXH, SKHULdaQ, WY 82801
Oab: 307.672.8945 _ dLUHcW: 307.461.4985 _ SacHOabV.cRP
¬
From: DSULO WZULJKWLQF.FRP <[e-mail]>
Sent: 7XHVGD\, AXJXVW 22, 2023 4:35 PM
To: :DGH NLHXZVPD <:[e-mail]>
Cc: VDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>; UDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>;
ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP
Subject: RH: PUHOLP ANFIELDS2307223
¬
I GRQ·W VHH WKH UHYLVHG ÀOH DWWDFKHG. ¬:RXOG \RX SOHDVH VHQG LW WR PH?
¬
ASULO
SHQW IURP P\ LPKRQH
¬
OQ AXJ 22, 2023, DW 8:43 AM, :DGH NLHXZVPD <:[e-mail]> ZURWH:
SDPSOHV KDYH EHHQ UHFRXQWHG ZLWK QR VLJQLÀFDQW FKDQJH.
¬
<LPaJH001.MSJ>

Wade NieXZVma
[e-mail]
LabRUaWRU\ OSHUaWLRQV MaQaJHU/RadLRcKHPLVWU\ SXSHUYLVRU
1673 THUUa AYHQXH, SKHULdaQ, WY 82801
Oab: 307.672.8945 _ dLUHcW: 307.461.4985 _ SacHOabV.cRP
¬
From: DSULO WZULJKWLQF.FRP <[e-mail]>
Sent: FULGD\, AXJXVW 18, 2023 3:32 PM
To: :DGH NLHXZVPD <:[e-mail]>; VDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL]
<[e-mail]]>
Cc: UDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>; ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP
Subject: RH: PUHOLP ANFIELDS2307223
¬
WaGH,
¬
WRXOG \RX SOHaVH UHcRXQW JURVV aOSKa aQG UHcaOcXOaWH aGMXVWHG JURVV aOSKa LQ WKH
IROORZLQJ VaPSOHV?
¬
S2307223-001
S2307223-003
S2307223-005
S2307223-006
S2307223-010
¬
KLQG RHJaUGV,
ASULO
¬
¬
¬
ASULO LaIIHUW\
WULJKW EQYLURQPHQWaO SHUYLcHV, IQc.
226 PHWHUVRQ SWUHHW
FRUW CROOLQV, CO 80525
[e-mail]
970-430-9001
From: :DGH NLHXZVPD <:[e-mail]>
Sent: FULGD\, AXJXVW 18, 2023 2:56 PM
To: VDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>
Cc: UDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>; DSULO WZULJKWLQF.FRP
<[e-mail]>; ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP <ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP>
Subject: PUHOLP ANFIELDS2307223
¬
SKHU\O
¬
FRU \RXU UHYLHZ
¬
<LPaJH001.MSJ>

Wade NieXZVma
[e-mail]
LabRUaWRU\ OSHUaWLRQV MaQaJHU/RadLRcKHPLVWU\ SXSHUYLVRU
1673 THUUa AYHQXH, SKHULdaQ, WY 82801
Oab: 307.672.8945 _ dLUHcW: 307.461.4985 _ SacHOabV.cRP
¬
3 PleaVe conVideU Whe enYiUonmenW befoUe pUinWing WhiV email
3 PleaVe conVideU Whe enYiUonmenW befoUe pUinWing WhiV email
B\ WKH 2/2/24 RU EHIRUH
¬

Wade NieXZVma
[e-mail]
LabRUaWRU\ OSeUaWLRQV MaQageU/RadLRcKePLVWU\ SXSeUYLVRU
1673 TeUUa AYeQXe, SKeULdaQ, WY 82801
Oab: 307.672.8945 _ dLUecW: 307.461.4985 _ SaceOabV.cRP
¬
From: DSULO WZULJKWLQF.FRP <[e-mail]>
Sent: 7KXUVGD\, JDQXDU\ 25, 2024 2:24 PM
To: :DGH NLHXZVPD <:[e-mail]>
Cc: 7RE\ :ULJKW <[e-mail]>
Subject: RH: ANFIELDS2311115BPUHOLP
¬
CAUTION: This email originated from outside Pace Analytical. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recogni]e the sender and know the content is safe.
ThaQkV Wade,

A cRXSOe ZeekV Rf UeYieZ aUe UeTXiUed fRU Whe UeSRUW VR I Qeed Whe daWa UeOaWiYeO\ VRRQ WR be
abOe WR dR Whe aQaO\ViV, SUeSaUe Whe UeSRUW, aQd geW iW UeYieZed. WheQ dR \RX aQWiciSaWe
fiQaOi]iQg Whe daWa?

KiQd RegaUdV,

ASUiO

ASULO LaffeUW\
WULgKW EQYLURQPeQWaO SeUYLceV, IQc.
226 PeWeUVRQ SWUeeW
FRUW CROOLQV, CO 80525
[e-mail]
970-430-9001
¬
If \RX Qeed WR VeQd Pe a ÀOe OaUgeU WKaQ 10 Pb, cOLcN KeUe
From: :DGH NLHXZVPD <:[e-mail]>
Sent: 7KXUVGD\, JDQXDU\ 25, 2024 2:12 PM
To: DSULO WZULJKWLQF.FRP <[e-mail]>
Cc: 7RE\ :ULJKW <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: ANFIELDS2311115BPUHOLP
¬
IW ZLOO EH GRQH EHIRUH WKH IRUJRW WR VSLNH \RXU VDPSOH IRU GA/GB VR I KDG LW UHUXQ.
¬

Wade NieXZVma
[e-mail]
LabRUaWRU\ OSeUaWLRQV MaQageU/RadLRcKePLVWU\ SXSeUYLVRU
1673 TeUUa AYeQXe, SKeULdaQ, WY 82801
Oab: 307.672.8945 _ dLUecW: 307.461.4985 _ SaceOabV.cRP
¬
From: DSULO WZULJKWLQF.FRP <[e-mail]>
Sent: 7KXUVGD\, JDQXDU\ 25, 2024 1:53 PM
To: :DGH NLHXZVPD <:[e-mail]>
Cc: 7RE\ :ULJKW <[e-mail]>
Subject: RH: ANFIELDS2311115BPUHOLP
¬
CAUTION: This email originated from outside Pace Analytical. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recogni]e the sender and know the content is safe.
Wade,

JXVW checkiQg RQ Whe VWaWXV Rf WhiV aQaO\WicaO UeSRUW. DR \RX haYe aQ eVWiPaWe Rf ZheQ \RX ZiOO
haYe a fiQaO UeSRUW? We haYe UegXOaWRU\ deadOiQe aW Whe eQd Rf FebUXaU\ fRU Whe UeSRUW WhaW
iQcOXdeV WheVe daWa. If Ze Qeed WR aVk fRU aQ e[WeQViRQ, I ZRXOd Oike WR dR WhaW VRRQeU UaWheU
WhaQ OaWeU.

KiQd RegaUdV,

ASUiO

From: :DGH NLHXZVPD <:[e-mail]>
Sent: MRQGD\, JDQXDU\ 15, 2024 11:34 AM
To: DSULO WZULJKWLQF.FRP <[e-mail]>
Cc: VDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>; UDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>;
ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP <ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP>; 7RE\ :ULJKW <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: ANFIELDS2311115BPUHOLP
¬
NRW \HW
¬

Wade NieXZVma
[e-mail]
LabRUaWRU\ OSeUaWLRQV MaQageU/RadLRcKePLVWU\ SXSeUYLVRU
1673 TeUUa AYeQXe, SKeULdaQ, WY 82801
Oab: 307.672.8945 _ dLUecW: 307.461.4985 _ SaceOabV.cRP
¬
From: DSULO WZULJKWLQF.FRP <[e-mail]>
Sent: MRQGD\, JDQXDU\ 15, 2024 11:25 AM
To: :DGH NLHXZVPD <:[e-mail]>
Cc: VDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>; UDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>;
ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP; 7RE\ :ULJKW <[e-mail]>
Subject: RH: ANFIELDS2311115BPUHOLP
¬
Wade,

Did \RX fiQaOi]e WhiV UeSRUW? I dRQ'W WhiQk I UeceiYed Whe fiQaO UeSRUW.

KiQd RegaUdV,

ASUiO
From: :DGH NLHXZVPD <:[e-mail]>
Sent: MRQGD\, NRYHPEHU 27, 2023 2:49 PM
To: DSULO WZULJKWLQF.FRP <[e-mail]>
Cc: VDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>; UDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>;
ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP <ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP>; 7RE\ :ULJKW <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: ANFIELDS2311115BPUHOLP
¬
¬
¬

Wade NieXZVma
[e-mail]
LabRUaWRU\ OSeUaWLRQV MaQageU/RadLRcKePLVWU\ SXSeUYLVRU
1673 TeUUa AYeQXe, SKeULdaQ, WY 82801
Oab: 307.672.8945 _ dLUecW: 307.461.4985 _ SaceOabV.cRP
¬
From: DSULO WZULJKWLQF.FRP <[e-mail]>
Sent: 7XHVGD\, NRYHPEHU 21, 2023 8:28 PM
To: :DGH NLHXZVPD <:[e-mail]>
Cc: VDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>; UDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>;
ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP; 7RE\ :ULJKW <[e-mail]>
Subject: RH: ANFIELDS2311115BPUHOLP
¬
Wade,

ThaQk \RX fRU Whe SUeOiPiQaU\ daWa.

The QiWUaWe+QiWUiWe UeVXOWV ZeUe PiVViQg fURP WhiV Sdf fRU SaPSOeV S2311115-010 aQd -011.
WRXOd \RX SOeaVe SURYide WheP?

ThaQkV
ASUiO
From: :DGH NLHXZVPD <:[e-mail]>
Sent: MRQGD\, NRYHPEHU 20, 2023 8:55 AM
To: DSULO WZULJKWLQF.FRP <[e-mail]>
Cc: VDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>; UDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>;
ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP <ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP>
Subject: ANFIELDS2311115BPUHOLP
¬
¬
¬

Wade NieXZVma
[e-mail]
LabRUaWRU\ OSeUaWLRQV MaQageU/RadLRcKePLVWU\ SXSeUYLVRU
1673 TeUUa AYeQXe, SKeULdaQ, WY 82801
Oab: 307.672.8945 _ dLUecW: 307.461.4985 _ SaceOabV.cRP
¬
3 PleaVe conVideU Whe enYiUonmenW befoUe pUinWing WhiV email
3 PleaVe conVideU Whe enYiUonmenW befoUe pUinWing WhiV email
IW ZDV FOHULFDO HUURU, À[HG LQ WKH DWWDFKHG UHSRUW.
¬

Wade NieXZVma
[e-mail]
LabRUaWRU\ OSeUaWLRQV MaQageU/RadLRcKePLVWU\ SXSeUYLVRU
1673 TeUUa AYeQXe, SKeULdaQ, WY 82801
Oab: 307.672.8945 _ dLUecW: 307.461.4985 _ SaceOabV.cRP
¬
From: DSULO WZULJKWLQF.FRP <[e-mail]>
Sent: WHGQHVGD\, JDQXDU\ 31, 2024 8:34 AM
To: WDGH NLHXZVPD <[e-mail]>
Cc: TRE\ WULJKW <[e-mail]>; VDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>; UDJDUOLQJ
UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>; ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP
Subject: RH: ANFIELDS2311115
¬
ThaQNV Wade,

OQe TXeVWiRQ. If Whe UeSRUWiQg OiPiW fRU gURVV aOSha iV 3 hRZ caQ Whe UeSRUWiQg OiPiW fRU gURVV
aOSha adMXVWed be OeVV? See 621111-011

KiQd RegaUdV,

ASUiO
From: WDGH NLHXZVPD <[e-mail]>
Sent: MRQGD\, JDQXDU\ 29, 2024 4:42 PM
To: DSULO WZULJKWLQF.FRP <[e-mail]>
Cc: TRE\ WULJKW <[e-mail]>; VDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>; UDJDUOLQJ
UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>; ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP <ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP>
Subject: ANFIELDS2311115
¬
II WKHUH DUH UHUXQV SOHDVH FRQVLGHU WKLV WKH ÀQDO UHSRUW
¬

Wade NieXZVma
[e-mail]
LabRUaWRU\ OSeUaWLRQV MaQageU/RadLRcKePLVWU\ SXSeUYLVRU
1673 TeUUa AYeQXe, SKeULdaQ, WY 82801
Oab: 307.672.8945 _ dLUecW: 307.461.4985 _ SaceOabV.cRP
¬
From: DSULO WZULJKWLQF.FRP <[e-mail]>
Sent: TKXUVGD\, JDQXDU\ 25, 2024 1:53 PM
To: WDGH NLHXZVPD <[e-mail]>
Cc: TRE\ WULJKW <[e-mail]>
Subject: RH: ANFIELDS2311115_PUHOLP
¬
Wade,

JXVW checNiQg RQ Whe VWaWXV Rf WhiV aQaO\WicaO UeSRUW. DR \RX haYe aQ eVWiPaWe Rf ZheQ \RX ZiOO
haYe a fiQaO UeSRUW? We haYe UegXOaWRU\ deadOiQe aW Whe eQd Rf FebUXaU\ fRU Whe UeSRUW WhaW
iQcOXdeV WheVe daWa. If Ze Qeed WR aVN fRU aQ e[WeQViRQ, I ZRXOd OiNe WR dR WhaW VRRQeU UaWheU
WhaQ OaWeU.

KiQd RegaUdV,

ASUiO

From: WDGH NLHXZVPD <[e-mail]>
Sent: MRQGD\, JDQXDU\ 15, 2024 11:34 AM
To: DSULO WZULJKWLQF.FRP <[e-mail]>
Cc: VDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>; UDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>;
ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP <ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP>; TRE\ WULJKW <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: ANFIELDS2311115_PUHOLP
¬
NRW \HW
¬

Wade NieXZVma
[e-mail]
LabRUaWRU\ OSeUaWLRQV MaQageU/RadLRcKePLVWU\ SXSeUYLVRU
1673 TeUUa AYeQXe, SKeULdaQ, WY 82801
Oab: 307.672.8945 _ dLUecW: 307.461.4985 _ SaceOabV.cRP
¬
From: DSULO WZULJKWLQF.FRP <[e-mail]>
Sent: MRQGD\, JDQXDU\ 15, 2024 11:25 AM
To: WDGH NLHXZVPD <[e-mail]>
Cc: VDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>; UDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>;
ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP; TRE\ WULJKW <[e-mail]>
Subject: RH: ANFIELDS2311115_PUHOLP
¬
Wade,

Did \RX fiQaOi]e WhiV UeSRUW? I dRQ'W WhiQN I UeceiYed Whe fiQaO UeSRUW.

KiQd RegaUdV,

ASUiO
From: WDGH NLHXZVPD <[e-mail]>
Sent: MRQGD\, NRYHPEHU 27, 2023 2:49 PM
To: DSULO WZULJKWLQF.FRP <[e-mail]>
Cc: VDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>; UDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>;
ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP <ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP>; TRE\ WULJKW <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: ANFIELDS2311115_PUHOLP
¬
¬
¬

Wade NieXZVma
[e-mail]
LabRUaWRU\ OSeUaWLRQV MaQageU/RadLRcKePLVWU\ SXSeUYLVRU
1673 TeUUa AYeQXe, SKeULdaQ, WY 82801
Oab: 307.672.8945 _ dLUecW: 307.461.4985 _ SaceOabV.cRP
¬
From: DSULO WZULJKWLQF.FRP <[e-mail]>
Sent: TXHVGD\, NRYHPEHU 21, 2023 8:28 PM
To: WDGH NLHXZVPD <[e-mail]>
Cc: VDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>; UDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>;
ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP; TRE\ WULJKW <[e-mail]>
Subject: RH: ANFIELDS2311115_PUHOLP
¬
Wade,

ThaQN \RX fRU Whe SUeOiPiQaU\ daWa.

The QiWUaWe+QiWUiWe UeVXOWV ZeUe PiVViQg fURP WhiV Sdf fRU SaPSOeV S2311115-010 aQd -011.
WRXOd \RX SOeaVe SURYide WheP?

ThaQNV
ASUiO
From: WDGH NLHXZVPD <[e-mail]>
Sent: MRQGD\, NRYHPEHU 20, 2023 8:55 AM
To: DSULO WZULJKWLQF.FRP <[e-mail]>
Cc: VDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>; UDJDUOLQJ UGHLQF.EL] <[e-mail]]>;
ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP <ODPL\DPRUULOO@\DKRR.FRP>
Subject: ANFIELDS2311115_PUHOLP
¬
¬
¬

Wade NieXZVma
[e-mail]
LabRUaWRU\ OSeUaWLRQV MaQageU/RadLRcKePLVWU\ SXSeUYLVRU
1673 TeUUa AYeQXe, SKeULdaQ, WY 82801
Oab: 307.672.8945 _ dLUecW: 307.461.4985 _ SaceOabV.cRP
¬
3 PleaVe conVideU Whe enYiUonmenW befoUe pUinWing WhiV email
3 PleaVe conVideU Whe enYiUonmenW befoUe pUinWing WhiV email
3 PleaVe conVideU Whe enYiUonmenW befoUe pUinWing WhiV email
3 PleaVe conVideU Whe enYiUonmenW befoUe pUinWing WhiV email
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
AR
HC

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report - 2023
February 2024

ATTACHMENT B
FIELD SAMPLING DATA FORMS

CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY Analytical Request Document LAB USE ONLY- Affix Workorder/Login Label Here or List Pace Workorder Number or
MTJL Log-in Number HereceAnalyticalSubmitting a sample via this chain of custody constitutes acknowledgment and acceptance of the Pace Terms and
Conditions found at: https://lnfo.pacelabs.com/hubfs/pas-standard-terms.pdf
Chain-of-Custody Is a LEGAL DOCUMENT - Complete all relevant fields
Company: Anfleld Resources Billing Information: on file ALL BOLD OUTLINED AREAS are for LAB USE ONLY
Address:
Container Preservative Type iLab Project Manager:
Report To: Toby Wright; 227 Jefferson St; Ft. Collins, Co
80524
2 1 1 UEmaii To; [e-mail]
●● Preservative Types: (1) nitric add, (2) sulfuric add, (3) hydrochloric add, (4) sodium hydroxide, (5) zinc acetate,
(6) methanoi, (7) sodium bisulfate, (8) sodium thiosulfate, (9) hexane, (A) ascorbic acid, (B) ammonium suifate,
(C) ammonium hydroxide, (D) TSP, (U) Unpreserved, (0) Other
Copy To: [e-mail] [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Site Collection Info/Address: Shootaring Canyon Mill, Utah
Analyses Lab Proflle/Une;Customer Project Name/Number: Shootaring Canyon Mill State:Ut County/City; Garfield/Ticaboo Time2one
Collected:Mountaln Standard o Lab Sample Receipt Checklist:
Custody Seals Present/Intact Y N NA
Custody Signatures Present
Collector Signature Present Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Bottles Intact
Correct Bottles
Sufficient Volume
Samples Received on Ice
VOA - Headspace Acceptable
USDA Regulated Soils
Samples in Holding Time
Residual Chlorine Present
Phone: [phone]S
Email: [e-mail]
SIte/FacllltylD#:D COCompliance Monitoring?
[ ] Yes [ INo
O)O<0 O
Collected By (print): L Morrill -I-Purchase Order #:
Quote #:
DW PWS ID #:
DW Location Code:
Q.O)CMo
Cl Strips:
Sample pH Acceptable
pH Strips;
Sulfide Present
Lead Acetate Strips:
X <oCollected By (signature);43Turnaround Date Required:Immediately Packed on Ice:
[ ]Yes [ ]No
tp Xo.
0 T3roSample Disposal:
[ 1 Dispose as appropriate
( ) Return
[ I Archive:
IHold:
Rush: (Expedite Charges Apply)
[ ) Same Day [ ] Next Day
[ ]2 Day ( ]3 Day
[ ] 4 Day [ ]5 Day
cField Filtered (if applicable):
[ ]Yes [ ]No
tp o3CDCMoooCMC(DQ-F o Y N N Aa:<uAnalysis;U stsTJcro Y N N AoN M a trix C o d e s (Ins e rt In M a trix bo x b e lo w): D ri nkin g W a t er (D W), G round W a t e r (G W ), W a st e w a t er (W W ),
Prod uc t (P), S oil/S olid (S L), O il (O L), W ip e (W P ), A ir (A R ), T issu e (T S ), B io a ss a y (B ), V a por (V ), O t h er (O T )
<0.t;0 .c<u O )(Da.<(0 O>-t-L A B U S E O N L Y ;
L a b S a m pl e # / C o mm e n t s:C o m p/cCollected (or
C omposit e S t a rt)
#ofRes O0)(COJOComposite E n dCustomer S a m pl e ID c C OMatrix *C OGrabEClCtns C OreEQ<0DateTimeCODateTimeou<<
R M -1 G W gr a b P‘7 .V O 2 X
p 1 X 5XL
P X1
R M-2 R gr a bGW P 2 —X
P 1 X
P 1 X X
R M-7 G W gr a b P/ -5 ;2 X
P 1 X 1pX1X
C ust o m e r R e m a rks / S p e ci a l C o ndition s / P oss ibl e H a z a rd s;T y p e of Ic e U s e d:L A B S a mpl e T e m p e ra tur e Info :
T e mp B l a n k R e c e i v e d: Y N N A
T h e rm I D #:
C o ol er 1 T e mp U p on R e c e ip t: o C
C o ol e r 1 T h erm C orr. F a c tor: c C
C o ol e r 1 C orre c t e d T e mp:o C
C o mm e n t s: Q —p
W e t B lu e D ry N on e S H O R T H O L D S P R E S E N T (<7 2 h o urs) : Y N N/A
P a c ki n g M a t eri a l U s e d:L a b Tra cking #:
S a mpl e s r e c e iv e d vi a :
F E D E X U P S C li e nt C o uri e r P a c e C ouri e rRadchem s a m pl e (s) s cr e e n e d (<500 c pm):N N A
R e lin quis h e d b y/C om p a ny : (S ign a tur e )D a t e /T i m e :
D a t e A lm e :
R e cqhjg d b y/C o mp^n y : (S ign a tur e ) D a t e /T im e :
C omp a n y; (S t a t ur e ) D a t e A i m e :
JJLl
R k e i v e d
M T JL L A B U S E O N L Y
T a bl e #;
R e linq u i sh e d b y/C o m p a ny : (S ign a tur e )A cc tn u m:
T e mpl a t e :
P r e l o gin:
T ri p B l a n k R e c e iv e d: Y N N A
H C L M e O H T S P O th erA// (h 1 2 >Ii y
R e lin quis h e d ^/C o m p a n y: (S ign a tur e )D a t e A im e :R e c e iv e d b y/C o m p a ny : (S i g n a ture )D a t e A im e :P M:N on C o nf orm a n c e(s): P a g e :
Y E S / N O of:P B:
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
AR
HC

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report - 2023
February 2024

ATTACHMENT C
LABORATORY DATA REPORTS

LAB USE ONLY- Affix Worfcorder/Login Label Here or List Pace Workorder Number or
MTJL Log-in Number Here
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY Analytical Request Document
ceAnalyticar Submitting a sample via this chain of custody constitutes acknowledgment and acceptance of the Pace Terms and
Conditions found at: https://info.pacelabs.com/hubfs/pas-standard'terms.pdf
Chain-of-Custody is a LEGAL DOCUMENT - Complete all relevant fields
Company: Anfield Resources Billing Information: on file ALL BOLD OUTLINED AREAS are for LAB USE ONLY
Address:*iL a b P roj e ct M a n a g e r:C o nt a i n e r P r e s erv a ti v e T yp e
2 1 1 UReport T o: T ob y Wright; 2 2 7 J e ff ers on S t; F t. C ollins, C o
8 0 5 2 4
E m a il T o: Wrig h t E n vi a gm a il.c o m
** Pre s erv a tiv e T y p e s: (1) nitri c a cid, (2) su lfuric a cid, (3) hydro c hloric a cid, (4) sodium h ydro xid e , (5) z in c a c e t a t e ,
(6) m e th a n ol, (7) sodium bisu lf a t e , (8) sodiu m t hio su lf a t e , (9) h e x a n e , (A) a s corbic a cid, (B) a mmo nium s ulf a t e ,
(C ) a m m on ium h y droxid e , (D) T S P , (U ) U n pre s e rv e d, (0) O t h e r ^
S it e C oll e ctio n In fo/A ddr e ss : S ho o t a ri n g C a nyo n M ill , U t a hCopy T o: l a miy a m orrill @ y a h o o.c om s a g a rli n g @ rd e inc .c o m
a pril @ t wrig ht.co m L a b Profil e /Lin e :A n a ly s e sState:U t C o u nt y/C ity : G a rfi e ld/T ic a b o o T im e Z o n e
C o ll e c t e d :Mou nt a l n S t a n d a rd
C ust o m e r Proj e c t N a m e /N umb e r: S ho ot arin g C a n y o n M ill L a b S a mp l e R e c e ip t C h e c k li s t:
C u sto d y S e a ls P r e s e n t/In t a c t Y N
C u sto d y S ig n a tur e s P r e s e nt
C o ll e c t or S ig n a tur e Pr e s e n t
B o t tl e s In t a ct
C orr e ct B o t tl e s
S u ffi ci e n t V olum e
S a m p l e s R e c e iv e d on Ic e
V O A - H e a d sp a c e A c c e p t a b l e
U S D A R e g u l a t e d S oils
S a m p l e s in H o l ding T im e
R e sid u a l C hl orin e Pr e s e n t
C l S tri p s:
N
Y N
Y N
Q J NY N
S a mpl e p H A c c e p t a b l e
p H S trip s:
Y N
S u lf i d e P re s e n t
L e a d A c e t a t e S tri p s:
Y N
O
3 C OSite/F a cility I D #:C o m p li a n c e M o nit ori ng?
[ ] Y e s [ ] N o
P h o n e : 435-633-3035
E m a il: l a m i y a morriil @ y a h oo .com
C D o N A(0 O N A+Q .C oll e ct e d B y (print): L M orrill D )P urch a s e O rd e r#:
Q u ot e #:
D W P W S I D #:
D W Lo c a ti on C o d e :
N A
N N A
N N A
C N<X ooin43inOCollected B y (s ig n a t ur e ):Im m e di a t e ly P a c k e d on Ic e :
[ ]Y e s [ ]N o
T urn a rou n d D a t e R e quir e d:X10CLw
C DV)T 5roCRush: (E x p e dit e C h arg e s A p ply)
[ ] S a m e D a y [ ] N e xt D a y
[ 12 D a y [ ]3 D a y
[ ]4 D a y [ ]5 D a y
F i e ld F ilt e re d (if a p p lic a b l e ):
[ ]Y e s [ ]N o
N A<s >S a mp l e D is po s a l:
[ 1 D is pos e a s a p pro pri a t e
[ ) R e turn
[ 1 A rchi v e :
I I H o id:
ID O3COOcOegoCNIC03Q.+N Aoa:0)uAnalysis:T O oU)o c N ArooNCOQ-* M a tri x C o d e s (in s e rt in M a tri x b ox b e lo w): D rin kin g W a t er (D W), G ro u nd W a t e r (G W), W a s t e w a t er (W W ),
Pro du c t (P ), S oil/S olid (S L), O il (O L), W i p e (W P ), A ir (A R ), T issu e (T S), B io a ss a y (B ), V a p or (V), O th er (O T )
cat O )<C OQ.(0 O>-L A B U S E O N L Y :
L a b S a m pl e # / C om m e nts:CComp /OCoilected (or
C om p o sit e S t a rt)
#o fRes 0)(0atOComposite E nd C OCOECustomer S a m ple I D M a tri x *G r a b C l C tn s C Oro
E<Q(0cin<D a t e T i m e D a t e T i m e ou Z
~O o lgrabRM-1 i i:9 3 p XGW2
P 1 X
p X1 X
-c 2 0 ^gr a bRM-2 R G W ^Y -V 7 p 2 X
P X1
P X1 X
gr a bRM-7 PGW 2 X
P 1 X
P X1 X
L A B S a mpl e T e mp e r a ture Info :
T e mp B l a n k R e c e iv e d: Y
T h e rm I D #:
C oo l e r 1 T e m p U p on R e c e ip t: o C
N N A
C o ol er 1 T h e rm C orr. F a c tor:
C o ol er 1 C orr e ct e d T e mp:
c e m e n t s ^
C u s tom e r R e m arks / S p e ci a l C o ndition s / P o s si b l e H a z a rd s: pyp e of Ic e U s e d:S H O R T H O L D S P R E S E N T (<7 2 hours) : Y N N/AWet B lu e Dry N o n e
P a c ki n g M a t e ri a l U s e d:L a b T r a c kin g #:
o CSamples r e c e iv e d vi a :
F E D E X U P S C li e nt C o uri e r P a c e C o uri e rRadchem s a m pl e (s) s cr e e n e d (<5 0 0 c p m):o CN N A
R e linqui s h e d b y/C o mp a ny: (S ign a tur e ) «
L M o rr-i l l
R e lin q uis h e d b y/C o mp a ny: (S ign a tur e )
D a t e /T im e :R e vi v e d b y/C o mo a ny: (S i g n a ture )
^/C o m p a n y: (^n a t ur e )R e c e iv e d
D a t e /T i m e :M T J L L A B U S E O N L Y
K ;cl D |T a b l e #:
D a t e /T im e :T rip B l a nk R e c e iv e d: Y N N A
H C L M e O H T S P O th er
D a t e /T i m e :A c e tnum:
T e mpl a t e :
P re login:
N on C o nf orm a n c e(s):
Y E S / N O
R e li nqu is h e dti y/C o mp a n y : (I D a t e /T im e :D a t e /T im e :P a g e :R e c e iv e d b y/C om p a ny : (S i g n a ture )P M:
o f:P B:J
LAB USE ONLY- Affix Workorder/Login Label Here or List Pace Workorder Number or
MTJL Log-in Number Here
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY Analytical Request Document
Analytical’Submitting a sample via this chain of custody constitutes acknowledgment and acceptance of the Pace Terms and
Conditions found at: https://info.pacelabs.com/hubfs/pas-standard-terms.pdf
Chain-of-Custody is a LEGAL DOCUMENT - Complete all relevant fields
Company: Anfield Resources Billing Information: on file ALL BOLD OUTLINED AREAS are for LAB USE ONLY
Address:
iLab Project Manager:Container Preservative Type
2 1 1 UReport To: Toby Wright; 227 Jefferson St; Ft. Collins, Co
80524
Email To: WrightEnvifflgmail.com
Preservative Types: (1) nitric acid, (2) sulfuric acid, (3) hydrochloric acid, (4) sodium hydroxide, (5) zinc acetate,
(6) methanol, (7) sodium bisulfate, (8) sodium thiosulfate, (9) hexane, (A) ascorbic acid, (B) ammonium sulfate,
(C) ammonium hydroxide, (D) TSP, (U) Unpreserved, (0) Other ^
**
Copy To: [e-mail] [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Site Collection Info/Address: Shootaring Canyon Mill, Utah
Lab Profile/Line:Analyses
State:Ut County/City: Garfield/ Ticaboo Time Zone
Collected:Mountain Standard
Customer Project Name/Number: Shootaring Canyon Mill Lab Sample Receipt Checklist:
Custody Seals Present/Intact Y N NA
Custody Signatures Present
Collector Signature Present
Bottles Intact
Correct Bottles
Sufficient Volume
Samples Received on Ice
VOA - Headspace Acceptable
USDA Regulated Soils
Samples in Holding Time
Residual Chlorine Present
Cl Strips:
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Sample pH Acceptable
pH Strips:
Y N NA
Sulfide Present
Lead Acetate Strips;
Y N NA
O
r)COSite/Facility ID #:Compliance Monitoring?
[ ] Yes [ !No
Phone: [phone]
Email: lamiyamorrill(Syahoo.com
O)OCdO+a.Collected By (print): L Morrill O)Purchase Order#:
Quote #:
DW PWSID#:
DW Location Code:
CMX<oo(OJO05Collected By (signature):Immediately Packed on Ice:
[ lYes [ ]No
Turnaround Date Required:X100.P
O plA
CSample D is po s a l:
t ] Dispos e a s a p pro pri a t e
[ ] R e t urn
[ ] A rchi v e :
[ ]H o ld:
R u s h: (E x p e dit e C h arg e s A p ply)
[ 1 S a m e D a y [ ] N e xt D a y
[ ]2 D a y [ ]3 D a y
[ ]4 D a y [ ] 5 D a y
F i e ld F ilt e re d (if a p p lic a b l e ):
[ ]Y e s [ ]N o
00 o3CDOcOCNiO
C T OQ.+o q:0)uAnalysis:T i-O2LOUc03oNCOCL* M a tri x C o d e s (In s ert in M a tri x b ox b e low): D rin kin g W a t er (D W), G ro u nd W a t e r (G W ), W a st e w a t er (W W ),
Prod uc t (P ), S oil/S olid (S L), O il (O L), W ip e (W P ), A ir (A R ), T issu e (T S), B io a ss a y (B ), V a por (V), O th er (O T )
cO)03 o >Q .<03 O>L A B U S E O N L Y :
L a b S a m pl e # / C om m e nts:cComp /OCollected (or
C om p o sit e S t a rt)
#ofRes 003<u OComposite E n d C OcCDEMatrix *C u s tom e r S a m ple I D G r a b C l C tn s C O(D
Q(0ct/5<D a t e T im e D a t e T im e oo 2
J'U P 3 —p <>yRM-8 gr a b PGW 2 X
P 1 X
P X X1
0:>S ~R M-1 2 gr a b P 2 XGW
P 1 X
P X1 X
- o o (S'R M-1 2 A T gr a b PGW 2 X
P X1
P X1 X
L A B S a m pl e T e mp e r a ture Info:
T e mp B l a n k R e c e iv e d: Y
th e rm I D #;
C o o l e r 1 T e m p U pon R e c e i p t: o C
N N A
C oo l e r 1 T h e rm C orr. F a c tor;
C oo l e r 1 C orr e c t e d T e mp;
C o mm e nts:
C ust o m e r R e m arks / S p e ci a l C o ndition s / P oss ibl e H a z ard s: pyp e of Ic e U s e d:S H O R T H O L D S P R E S E N T (<7 2 ho urs) : Y N N/AWet B lu e Dry N o n e
L a b T ra c k ing #:P a c ki n g M a t e ri a l U s e d:
o CSamples r e c e iv e d vi a :
F E D E X U P S C li e nt C o uri e r P a c e C o uri e rRadchem s a m pl e (s) s cr e e n e d (<500 c pm):o CN N A
R e lin q uis h e d b y/C om p a ny : (S ign a tur e ) - .
L m O fri D
D a t e /T i m e :R e c e iv e d b y/C o m p a ny : (S ign a tur e )D a t e /T im e :M T J L L A B U S E O N L Y
i'K '^9 U l O C T a bl e #:
T rip B l a nk R e c e iv e d: Y N N A
H C L M e O H T S P O th e r
R e lin q uis h e d b y/C om p a ny : (S ign a tur e )D a t e /T im e :by/C o m p U i y: (S ig n a t ur e )J 2 r-x -c r m -D a t e /T im e :A cc tn u m:
T e m p l a t e :
P r e l o gin:
R e c e
7//1/J L T n n
4 > —
R e lin q u isfr e d b y/C o m^n y : (S ign a tur e ) O N o n C onf orm a n c e (s): P a g e :
Y E S / N O of:
D a t e /T i m e :D a t e A im e :R e c e iv e d b y/C om p a ny : (S ign a tur e )P M:
P B :
LAB USE ONLY- Affix Workorder/Logln Label Here or List Pace Workorder Number or
MTJL Log-in Number HereCHAIN-OF-CUSTODY Analytical Request Document
Analytical Submitting a sample via this chain of custody constitutes acknowledgment and acceptance of the Pace Terms and
Conditions found at: https://info.pacelabs.com/hubfs/pas-standard-terms.pdf
Chain-of-Custody is a LEGAL DOCUMENT - Complete all relevant fields
ALL BOLD OUTLINED AREAS are for LAB USE ONLYBilling Information: on fileCompany: Anfield Resources
Address:iLab Project Manager:**Container Preservative Type
2 1 1 U
Email To: [e-mail] To: Toby Wright; 227 Jefferson St; Ft. Collins, Co
80524 Preservative Types: (1) nitric acid, (2) sulfuric acid, (3) hydrochloric acid, (4) sodium hydroxide, (5) zinc acetate,
(6) methanol, (7) sodium bisulfate, (8) sodium thiosulfate, (9) hexane, (A) ascorbic acid, (B) ammonium sulfate,
(C) ammonium hydroxide, (D) TSP, (U) Unpreserved, (0) Other
**
Site Collection Info/Address: Shootaring Canyon Mill, UtahCopy To: [e-mail] [e-mail]
april@t\wright.com Lab Profile/Llne:Analyses
State:Ut County/City: Garfield/Ticaboo Time Zone
Collected:Mountain Standard
Customer Project Name/Number: Shootaring Canyon Mill Lab Sample Receipt Checklist:
Custody Seals Present/Intact Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Custody Signatures Present
Collector Signature Present
Bottles Intact
Correct Bottles
Sufficient Volume
Samples Received on Ice
VGA - Headspace Acceptable
USDA Regulated Soils
Samples in Holding Time
Residual Chlorine Present
O
3 COCompliance Monitoring?
[ ] Yes [ INo
Site/Facility ID#:Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
O)Oo+o.05
Cl Strips:
Sample pH Acceptable
pH Strips;
Sulfide Present
Lead Acetate Strips:
DW PWS ID #:
DW Location Code;
Purchase Order#:
Quote #:
CMCollected By (print): L Morrill <I Oo-Q
Immediately Packed on Ice:
i[ ]Yes [ INO
XCollected By (signature):Turnaround Date Required:D.U5
(/I DOCField F ilt e re d (if a p p lic a b l e ):
[ ]Y e s [ ]N 0
R u s h: (E x p e dit e C h a rg e s A p ply)
[ ] S a m e D a y [ ] N e xt D a y
[ 1 2 D a y [ ] 3 D a y
[ ] 4 D a y [ ]5 D a y
S a m ple D is po s a l:
[ 1 Dispos e a s a p pro pri a t e
[ 1 R e t urn
[ 1 A rc hiv e :
[ I H o ld:
C P OCOoOCMo.t;C MC Ll .C OL_o Y N N Aa.+0)o 5Analysis:K T O o c Y N N AfooNCQD- M a tri x C o d e s (In s ert in M a tri x bo x b e low): D rink i n g W a t e r (D W), G ro u nd W a t er (G W ), W a st e w a t er (W W ),
Prod uc t (P ), S oil/S olid (S L), O il (O L), W i p e (W P ), A ir (A R ), T is s u e (T S), B io a ss a y (B), V a p or (V), O t h er (O T )
c O )C O <C D o>-L A B U S E O N L Y :
L a b S a m pl e # / C om m e nts:C O#ofCollected (or
C om p o sit e S t a rt)
R e sComp /0)C DOOJComposite E n d C OcCDEClCtnsMatrix *G r a b C OCustomer S a m ple ID E t o Qz05<T i m eDateTimeDate o <u
P 2grabRM-1 4 G W
P X1
X Xp1
— z >c >TXP2grab3-i i g 3 ^:4 7RM-1 8 G W
P 1 X
XP X1
P Xgrab2RM-1 9 G W
P 1 X
X XP1
L A B S a m ple T e mp e r a ture Info:
T e m p B l a n k R e c e i v e d; Y
T h e rm I D #;
C o o l e r 1 T e m p U pon R e c e i p t: o C
N N A
C o ol er 1 T h erm C orr. F a c t or:
C o ol e r 1 C orr e c t e d T e mp;
C o mm e nts:
S H O R T H O L D S P R E S E N T (<7 2 hours): Y N N /ACustomer R e m arks / S p e cia l C o ndition s / P o s si b l e H a z ard s;W e t B lu e D ry N o n eType of Ic e U s e d:
L a b Tra cking #:P a ckin g M a t e ri a l U s e d:
o C
S a mpl e s r e c e iv e d vi a :
F E D E X U P S C li e nt C o uri e r P a c e C o uri e r
o Cadchem s a m pl e (s) s cr e e n e d (<500 c pm):N N A
M T JL L A B U S E O N L YDate/T i m e :
5 ‘-//v R 3Reserved b y A C otjip a ny; (S i g n a ture )
I^/C o m p a n y q s
A
ig n a tur e )i v e d
D a t e /T i m e :R e li n quis h e d b y/C o m p^y : (S i g n a ture ) ^ >L M o rri U J !
7//J/JIJ l//f
T a bl e #:"7 T ri p B l a nk R e c e iv e d: Y N N A
H C L M e O H T S P O th e r
D a t e /T im e ;A cc tn u m:
T e mpl a t e :
P re login:
P M:
P B ;
D a t e /T im e :R e lin q uis h e d b y/C om p a ny : (S i g n a ture )
1 Y \N o n C onform a nc e (s): P a g e :
Y E S / N O o f:R e linq u ish e cI b y/C o m p a ny : (S i g n a ture ) ^D a t e /T im e :R e c e iv e d b y/C om p a ny : (S i g n a ture )D a t e /T im e :
LAB USE ONLY- Affix Workorder/Login Label Here or List Pace Workorder Number or
MTJL Log-in Number Here
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY Analytical Request Document
ce Analytical'Submitting a sample via this chain of custody constitutes acknowledgment and acceptance of the Pace Terms and
Conditions found at: https://info.pacelabs.com/hubfs/pas-standard-terms.pdf
Chain-of-Custody is a LEGAL DOCUMENT - Complete alt relevant fields
Billing Information: on fileCompany: Anfield Resources ALL BOLD OUTLINED AREAS are for LAB USE ONLY
Address:iLab Projert Manager:**C on t a in e r P r e s e rv a tiv e t y p e
2 1 1 UReport T o: T o b y Wright; T il J e ff e rson S t; F t. C ollins, C o
8 0 5 2 4
E m a il T o: Wright E nv @ g m a il.c o m
Pre s e rv ativ e T y p e s: (1) nitri c a cid, (2) su lfuric a cid, (3) h ydroch loric a cid, (4) sodium h y droxid e , (5) z in c a c e t a t e ,
(6) m e t h a no l, (7) sodium bisu lf a t e , (8) sodium t hios ulf a t e , (9) h e x a n e , (A) a s corbic a cid , (B) a m m on ium s ulf a t e ,
(C) a mmo nium h y droxid e , (D) T S P, (U ) U npr e s erv e d, (0) O th er ^S it e C o ll e c ti o n In fo/A ddr e ss : S ho ot arin g C a n y o n M ill , U t a hCopyTo: l a miy a morrill @ y a h o o.c om s a g a rling @ rd e in c.c o m
a pril @ t wri g ht.c o m L a b Profil e /Lin e :A n a lys e sState:U t C o un ty/C ity : G a rfi e ld/T i c a b o o T i m e Z o n e
C o ll e ct e d:M o u nt a i n S t a n d a rd
C u st o m e r P roj e ct N a m e /N umb e r: S ho o t a ri n g C a nyo n M ill L a b S a m pl e R e c e ip t C h e c klis t:
C u sto d y S e a ls P r e s e nt/In t a c t Y N N A
C us t od y S ig n a tur e s Pr e s e n t
C oll e c t or S ig n a tur e P r e s e n t
B o ttl e s In t a c t
C orr e ct B o t tl e s
S u ffi ci e n t V olum e
S a m p l e s R e c e iv e d o n Ic e
V O A - H e a d sp a c e A c c e pt a b l e
U S D A R e g u l a t e d S o il s
S a m pl e s in H o l ding T i m e
R e sid u a l C hl orin e P re s e n t
C l S trip s:
Y N N A
Y N N A
Y N N A
Y N N A
Y N N A
Y N N A
Y N N A
Y N N A
Y N N A
Y N N A
S a mp l e p H A c c e p t a bl e
p H S trip s:
Y N N A
S ul f id e P re s e n t
L e a d A c e t a t e S trip s:
Y N N A
O
=3 C OSite/F a c ility I D #;C o m p li a n c e M onitori n g ?
[ 1 Y e s [ ]N o
P h on e : 435-6 3 3-3035
E m a il: l a miy a morrill @ y a h o o.c om
O )OCDO4=+Q .05Collected B y (prin t): L M orrill P urc h a s e O rd e r#:
Q uo t e #:
D W P W S I D #:
D W Lo c a ti on C o d e :
C NX.<ooC/542C/3Collected B y (s ig n a t ur e ):T urn aro un d D a t e R e quir e d:Im m e di a t e ly P a ck e d o n Ic e :
[ ]Y e s [ ]N 0
XQ.^D Pe>T 2be:(TJ cRush: (E x p e dit e C h arg e s A p ply)
[ ] S a m e D a y [ ] N e xt D a y
[ 1 2 D a y [ ]3 D a y
[ ]4 D a y [ ]5 D a y
F i e ld F ilt e re d (if a p plic a bl e ):
[ ]Y e s [ ]N o
S a m ple D is po s a l:
[ 1 Dispo s e a s a ppropri a t e
[ ] R e turn
[ ] A rc hiv e :
[ ]H ol d:
C O oCDoo.C NoCNcCDD--F o05oAnalysis:sT24-^
OcrtT3CreoN(/)C L* M a tri x C od e s (In s ert in M a tri x b ox b e l o w): D rink i n g W a t er (D W ), G ro u nd W a t er (G W ), W a st e w a t er (W W ),
P ro du ct (P ), S oil/S olid (S L), O il (O L), W i p e (W P ), A ir (A R ), T is s u e (T S), B i o a s s a y (B ), V a por (V), O th er (O T )
cor C 3)<C DQ.C D O>-f L A B U S E O N L Y :
L a b S a m pl e # / C o mm e nts:
-C OComp/C o ll e ct e d (or
C om p o sit e S t a rt)
#ofRes 0)C D(U OComposite E n d C OcCDEMatrix C l C tn sCustomer S a m ple I D G r a b C Ore
QCDc5</)<D a t e T im e D a t e T i m e
-o/ORM-2 0 gr a b P XGW2
P 1 X
Xp1 X
S ‘o ograbRM-1 0 0 P 2 XGW-3-|.l g »3
P X1
P X X1
M S /M S D gr a b P 3 XGW
S e e W a d e f or L o g g i n g P X1
t h i s s a m p l e XP X1
L A B S a mpl e T e mp e r a ture Info :
T e mp B l a n k R e c e iv e d : Y
T h e rm I D #:
C oo l e r 1 T e m p U p o n R e c e i p t: o C
N N A
C o ol er 1 T h erm C orr. F a c t or:
C o ol er 1 C orr e ct e d T e mp:
C omm e n t s:
C u s tom e r R e m a rks / S p e ci a l C o ndition s / P o ss ibl e H a z ard s: j-y p e of Ic e U s e d:S H O R T H O L D S P R E S E N T (<7 2 ho urs) : Y N N /AWet B lu e D ry N o n e
L a b Tr a c k i n g #:P a ckin g M a t e ri a l U s e d:
o CSamples r e c e iv e d vi a :
F E D E X U P S C li e nt C o uri e r P a c e C o uri e rRadchem s a m pl e (s) scr e e n e d (<5 0 0 c pm):o CN N A
D a t e /T i m e :M T JL L A B U S E O N L YRelinquished b y/C o m p a ^ (S i g n a ture )L M a r p '/f
R e linqui s h e d b y/C om p a ny : (S ign a tur e )
K \b y/C om|S a n y: (S ign a tur e )R e li n q ui sfi e d
D a t e /T i m e :R e tf e iv e d by/C cMi p a n y: (S i g n a ture )
F a bl e #:L
T rip B l a nk R e c e iv e d: Y N N A
H C L M e O H T S P O th e r
D a t e /T i m e :A c e tnum:
T e m p l a t e :
P re login:
D a t e /T i m e :ign a t ur e )fin'A -a z/j jr ///<?M l
N o n C onf orm a n c e (s):
Y E S / N O
P a g e :D a t e /T i m e :D a t e /T i m e :R e c e iv e d b y/C o m p a ny : (S ign a tur e )P M:
o f:P B :
DC# Title: ENV-FRM-SHRT-0033 vOO_Condition Upon Receipt Form Terra
Lab
I ASSlTTJCilSEaViCiS
Effective Date: 05/13/2022
Survey Meter #
pH strip lot #
Thermometer SN#
Condition Upon Receipt (Attach to COC)
Model 12SASN 136491
HC203864
221511272
Sample Receipt
1 Number of ice chests/packages received:
Note as "OTC " if samples are received over the counter, unpackaged
2 Temperature of cooler/samples, (tf more than 8 coolers, please write on back)
Temps Observed (°C): L
Temps Corrected (°C):| -'a .fa
Acceptable is: 0.1° to 10°C for Bacteria: and 0.1° to 6°C for most other water parameters. Samples may not have had adequate time to cool
following collection. Indicate ROI (Received on Ice) for iced samples received on the same day as sampled, in addition to temperature at receipt
Client contact for temperatures outside method criteria must be documented below.
3 Emission rate of samples for radiochemical analyses < 0.5mR/hr? No N/A
NoROI?e:
O-b -3 <
-J>.l0.0
es
4 COC Number (If applicable);
5 Do the number of bottles agree with the COC?
6 Were the samples received intact? (no broken bottles, leaks, etc.)
7 Were the sample custody seals intact?
8 Is the COC properly completed, legible, and signed?
Sample Verification. Labeling & Distribution
1 Were all requested analyses understood and appropriate?
2 Did the bottle labels correspond with the COC information?
3 Samples collected in method-prescribed containers?
4 Sample Preservation;
pH at Receipt:
_ Total Metals
Diss Metals
Nutrient
Cyanide
Sulfide
Phenol
SDWA Rads
5 VOA vials have <6mm headspace?
6 Were all analyses within holding time at the time of receipt?
7 Have rush or project due dates been checked and accepted?
8 Do samples require subcontracted analyses?
If "Yes", which type of subcontracting is required?
Sample Receipt, Verification, Login, Labeling & Distribution completed by (initials):
z
&
Yes
e:
e
Yes
es
Preservative/Lot#Final pH (if added in lab):
Total Metals
Diss Metals
Nutrient
HN03_
HN03_
H2SO4
NaOHCyanide
Sulfide ZnAcet
H2SO4
HNO3.
Phenol
SDWA Rads
Yes
&
Yes
Yes
CustoGeneral
N/ANo
N/ANo
No
No
# 0,'s ^
No
C 0^^(/.
No;
Date/Time Added;
Filtered and preserved in metals
No
No
&
No
mer-Specified Certified
DJ
Set ID:
Discrepancy Documentation (use back of sheet for notes on discrepancies)
Any items listed above with a response of "No" or do not meet specifications must be resolved.
Method of Contact;Phone:Person Contacted:
Email:Initiated By]
Problem:
Date/Time:
Resolution:
Page 1 of 1Qualtrax ID: 70962
8/2/2023Date:
Pace Anal\tical
1673 Terra Avenue Sheridan, WY 82801 ph: [phone]
Samples RM-1, RM-100, RM-12, RM-12AT, RM-14, RM-18, RM-19, RM-20, RM-2R, RM-7 and RM-8 Zere received on
March 13, 2023.
All samples Zere received and anal\]ed Zithin recommended holding times, e[cept those noted beloZ in this case narrative.
Samples Zere anal\]ed using methods outlined in the folloZing references:
Standard Methods for the E[amination of Water and WasteZater, approved method versions
EPA Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Ph\sical/Chemical Methods, SW-846, online versions
EPA methods 40 CFR Parts 136 and 141EPA 600/2-78-054 methods
NDEP Mining Methods
40 CFR Part 50, Appendices B, J, L, O and FEM EQL-0310-189
IO Compendium Methods
Clean Water Act Methods Update Rule for the Anal\sis of Effluent, current version.
ASTM approved and recogni]ed standards
ISO approved and recogni]ed standards
USDA Handbook 60
Soil Surve\ Laborator\ Manual Ver 4.0
ASA/SSSA 9 Methods of Anal\sis Part 2, 1982
ASA/SSSA Methods of Anal\sis Book 5 Part 3, 1996
Other industr\ approved methods

All Qualit\ Control parameters met the acceptance criteria defined b\ EPA and Pace Anal\tical e[cept as indicated in this
case narrative:
This report, S2303166-002, Zas revised to include a QC section.
Project:Shootaring Can\on Mill
CLIENT:Anfield Resources/Wright Enviornmental Services In
Lab Order:S2303166
CASE NARRATIVE
Report ID:S2303166002
(Replaces S2303166001)
Tom Patten, Laborator\ Manager
Entire Report ReYieZed b\:
Page 1 of 2
8/2/2023Date:
Pace Anal\tical
1673 Terra Avenue Sheridan, WY 82801 ph: [phone]
Definitions
RL Reporting Limit
Qualifiers
* Value e[ceeds Ma[imum Contaminant Level
A Check MSA specifications
B Anal\te detected in the associated Method Blank
CCalculated Value
D Report limit raised due to dilution
E Value above quantitation range
G Anal\]ed at Pace Gillette, WY laborator\
H Holding times for preparation or anal\sis e[ceeded
JAnal\te detected beloZ quantitation limits
L Anal\]ed b\ another laborator\
M Value e[ceeds Monthl\ Ave or MCL or is less than LCL
N Sample anal\]ed outside of compliance requirements
ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit
OOutside the Range of Dilutions
P Sample preserved in lab at time of receipt
R RPD outside accepted recover\ limits
S Spike Recover\ outside accepted recover\ limits
UAnal\te beloZ method detection limit
XMatri[ Effect
Page 2 of 2
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\7RWDO$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
&KORULGH  PJ/(3$$%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& .$7
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ -06
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ $0%
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% .$7
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 -06
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/ (3$ 6).
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'505
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH30
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2 1' PJ/ 60% .$7
&KORULGH  PJ/ (3$ $%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& .$7
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ -06
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ $0%
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% .$7
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 -06
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/ (3$ 6).
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'505
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH30
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2 1' PJ/ 60% .$7
&KORULGH  PJ/(3$$%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& .$7
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ -06
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ $0%
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% .$7
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 -06
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/ (3$ 6).
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2 1' PJ/ 60% .$7
&KORULGH  PJ/ (3$ $%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& .$7
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ -06
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ $0%
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% .$7
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 -06
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF  PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/ (3$ 6).
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH30
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2 1' PJ/ 60% .$7
&KORULGH  PJ/ (3$ $%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& .$7
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ -06
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ $0%
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% .$7
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 -06
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/ (3$ 6).
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH30
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50$7
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
&KORULGH  PJ/ (3$ $%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& .$7
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ -06
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ $0%
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% .$7
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 -06
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/ (3$ 6).
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50$7
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
&KORULGH  PJ/(3$$%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& .$7
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ -06
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ $0%
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% .$7
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 -06
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/ (3$ 6).
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
&KORULGH  PJ/(3$$%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& .$7
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ -06
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ $0%
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% .$7
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 -06
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/ (3$ 6).
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
&KORULGH  PJ/(3$$%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& .$7
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ -06
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ $0%
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% .$7
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 -06
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/ (3$ 6).
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2 1' PJ/ 60% .$7
&KORULGH  PJ/(3$$%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& .$7
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ -06
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ $0%
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% .$7
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 -06
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF  PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/ (3$ 6).
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
&KORULGH  PJ/(3$$%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& .$7
)OXRULGH  +PJ/ 60)& .$7
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ -06
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ $0%
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% .$7
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 -06
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/ (3$ 6).
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$ONDOLQLW\6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R%/$1.
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2 1'
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2 1'
$ONDOLQLW\7RWDO$V&D&2 1'
$ONDOLQLW\6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R$74&
$ONDOLQLW\7RWDO$V&D&2
$ONDOLQLW\6DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$'
 $ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2 
1' $ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2 1'
 $ONDOLQLW\7RWDO$V&D&2 
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$'
 $ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2 
 $ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2 
 $ONDOLQLW\7RWDO$V&D&2 
&RQGXFWLYLW\E\60%6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWV —PKRVFP
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R%/$1.
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\ 1'
&RQGXFWLYLW\E\60%6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWV—PKRVFP
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R$74&
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\
&RQGXFWLYLW\E\60%6DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWV—PKRVFP
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$'
 (OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\ 
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R 6$'
 (OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\ 
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
'LVVROYHG0HUFXU\E\(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R0%
0HUFXU\ 1'
'LVVROYHG0HUFXU\E\(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R/&6
0HUFXU\
'LVVROYHG0HUFXU\E\(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWV PJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6
 1'0HUFXU\
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6
 1'0HUFXU\
'LVVROYHG0HUFXU\E\(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6'
 0HUFXU\
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6'
 0HUFXU\
'LVVROYHG0HUFXU\E\(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6''
1' 0HUFXU\ 1'
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&3(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R0%/.',66&$7
=LQF 1'
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&3(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R',66/&6
=LQF 
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&3(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWV PJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6
 1'=LQF 
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6
 1'=LQF 
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&3(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6'
 =LQF 
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6'
 =LQF 
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&3(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6''
1' =LQF 1'
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&306(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R0%/.
$UVHQLF 1'
%DULXP 1'
&DGPLXP 1'
&KURPLXP 1'
&RSSHU 1'
/HDG 1'
0RO\EGHQXP 1'
6HOHQLXP 1'
6LOYHU 1'
8UDQLXP 1'
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&306(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R/&6
$UVHQLF 
%DULXP 1'
&DGPLXP 
&KURPLXP 
&RSSHU 
/HDG 
0RO\EGHQXP 
6HOHQLXP 
6LOYHU 
8UDQLXP 
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&306(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6
 1'$UVHQLF 
 1'%DULXP 
 1'&DGPLXP 
 1'&KURPLXP 
 1'&RSSHU 
 1'/HDG 
 1'0RO\EGHQXP 
 1'6HOHQLXP 
 1'6LOYHU 
 8UDQLXP 
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&306(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'06'
 $UVHQLF 
 %DULXP 
 &DGPLXP 
 &KURPLXP 
 &RSSHU 
 /HDG 
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&306(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'06'
 0RO\EGHQXP 
 6HOHQLXP 
 6LOYHU 
 8UDQLXP 
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&306(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6''
1' $UVHQLF 1'
1' %DULXP 1'
1' &DGPLXP 1'
1' &KURPLXP 1'
1' &RSSHU 1'
1' /HDG 1'
1' 0RO\EGHQXP 1'
1' 6HOHQLXP 1'
1' 6LOYHU 1'
 8UDQLXP 
)OXRULGHE\606DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R%/$1.
)OXRULGH 1'
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R%/$1.
)OXRULGH 1'
)OXRULGHE\606DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R $74&
)OXRULGH 
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R$74&
)OXRULGH 
)OXRULGHE\606DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$63.06
 )OXRULGH 
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$63.06
 )OXRULGH 
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
)OXRULGHE\606DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$63.06'
 )OXRULGH 
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$63.06'
 )OXRULGH 
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$63.06'
 )OXRULGH 
)OXRULGHE\606DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$'
 )OXRULGH 
*URVV$OSKD%HWDE\60%6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWV S&L/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R0%/.
*URVV$OSKD'LVVROYHG 1'
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R0%/.
*URVV$OSKD'LVVROYHG 1'
*URVV$OSKD%HWDE\60%6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVS&L/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R/&6$
*URVV$OSKD'LVVROYHG
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R /&6$
*URVV$OSKD'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD%HWDE\60%6DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWVS&L/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6(06$
 *URVV$OSKD'LVVROYHG
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6&06$
 *URVV$OSKD'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD%HWDE\60%6DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWVS&L/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$'83
 *URVV$OSKD'LVVROYHG 
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$'83
 *URVV$OSKD'LVVROYHG 
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQVE\,21&KURPDWRJUDSK\6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R%/.
&KORULGH 1'
6XOIDWH 1'
$QLRQVE\,21&KURPDWRJUDSK\6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R/&6
&KORULGH 
6XOIDWH 
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R/&6
&KORULGH 
6XOIDWH 
$QLRQVE\,21&KURPDWRJUDSK\6DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWV PJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R 6$63.
 &KORULGH 
 6XOIDWH 
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$63.
 &KORULGH 
 6XOIDWH 
$QLRQVE\,21&KURPDWRJUDSK\6DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$63.'
 &KORULGH 
 6XOIDWH 
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$63.'
 &KORULGH 
 6XOIDWH 
$QLRQVE\,21&KURPDWRJUDSK\6DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWV PJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R 6$'
 &KORULGH 
 6XOIDWH 
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$'
 &KORULGH 
 6XOIDWH 
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
&DWLRQVE\,&30HWKRG6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R0%/.',66&$7
&DOFLXP 1'
0DJQHVLXP 1'
3RWDVVLXP 1'
6RGLXP 1'
&DWLRQVE\,&30HWKRG6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R',66/&6
&DOFLXP 
0DJQHVLXP 
3RWDVVLXP 
6RGLXP 
&DWLRQVE\,&30HWKRG6DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R 6$6
 &DOFLXP 
 0DJQHVLXP 
 3RWDVVLXP 
 6RGLXP 
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R 6$6
 &DOFLXP 
 0DJQHVLXP 
 3RWDVVLXP 
 6RGLXP 
&DWLRQVE\,&30HWKRG6DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R 6$6'
 &DOFLXP 
 0DJQHVLXP 
 3RWDVVLXP 
 6RGLXP 
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R 6$6'
 &DOFLXP 
 0DJQHVLXP 
 3RWDVVLXP 
 6RGLXP 
&DWLRQVE\,&30HWKRG6DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWV PJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$'
 &DOFLXP 
 0DJQHVLXP 
 3RWDVVLXP 
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
&DWLRQVE\,&30HWKRG6DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$'
 6RGLXP 
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLDDV16DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R:&%
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLDDV1 1'
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLDDV16DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWV PJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R,&9
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLDDV1
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLDDV16DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6&
 1'1LWURJHQ$PPRQLDDV1
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLDDV16DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6&
 1LWURJHQ$PPRQLDDV1
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV16DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWV PJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R0%/.
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1 1'
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV16DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R/&6
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV16DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'
 1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV16DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWV PJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'
 1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLXPLQ:DWHU'LVVROYHG 6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVS&L/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R3UHS'DWH%DWFK,'0%
5DGLXP'LVVROYHG 1'
5DGLXPLQ:DWHU'LVVROYHG 6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVS&L/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R3UHS'DWH%DWFK,'/&6
5DGLXP'LVVROYHG
5DGLXPLQ:DWHU'LVVROYHG 6DPSOH7\SH /&6'8QLWV S&L/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R3UHS'DWH%DWFK,'/&6'
 5DGLXP'LVVROYHG
5DGLXPLQ:DWHU'LVVROYHG 6DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWVS&L/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R3UHS'DWH%DWFK,'6(06
 5DGLXP'LVVROYHG
5DGLXPLQ:DWHU'LVVROYHG 6DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVS&L/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R3UHS'DWH%DWFK,'6(06'
 5DGLXP'LVVROYHG
6LOLFDDV6L26DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWV PJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R0%/.',66&$7
6LOLFDDV6L2 1'
6LOLFDDV6L26DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R',66/&6
6LOLFDDV6L2
6LOLFDDV6L26DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6''
 6LOLFDDV6L2 
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
6ROLGV%\606DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R',
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV 1'
6ROLGV%\606DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R&21752/
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV
6ROLGV%\606DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWV PJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$
 7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV 
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$
 7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV 
3DJHRI
Shootaring Canyon Mill
SHOOTARING CANYON MILL GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM
QAP FIELD SAMPLING CHECKLIST
Sample Collection Date: 3/10-11/2023
Reviewer\Date: April Lafferty 5/26/2023
RM-100
Field Sampling YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO
Meter function check OK & Recorded?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
Water level recorded to 0.01 feet?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
Well casing volume correctly calculated?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
Pumping rate determined and recorded?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
Field Parameter Stabilization
Minimum interval achieved?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
3 readings with pH ± 0.2 s.u.; Conductivity ± 10% ?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
Sufficient minimum well volume pumped?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
Sample bottles & preservatives correct and recorded?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
COMMENTS
RM-1
RM-2R
RM-7
RM-8
RM-12 well was sampled when approximately one gallon is left to ensure a sample is collected before the water level reaches the pump
RM-14
RM-18 Blind Field Dup as RM100
RM-19
RM-20
DUP Blind Field Dup of RM18
Tails
Blind DupBlind DupRM-12 RM-14 RM-18 RM-19 Tails SumpRM-1 RM-2R RM-7 RM-8 RM-20
Shootaring Canyon Mill
SHOOTARING CANYON MILL GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM
QAP DATA COMPLETENESS & DATA PACKAGE QA/QC CHECKLIST
Sample Collection Date: 3/10-11/2023 Report Date\Work Order No.: S2303166
Reviewer\Date: April Lafferty 5/26/2023
Data Completeness YES NO YES NO
Lab certification still current?ü Is Lab QA\QC summary report present?ü
Is receipt temperature, between 0.1 and 6 degrees C?ü Do all samples sent have reported analyses (QAP Table 3)?ü
Chain of Custody complete and intact as per approved QAP?ü Were all analytes requested reported (QAP Table 3)?ü
Received w/ custody seals intact?ü Are all field forms present from field site?ü
RM-100
Data Package QA\QC YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO
Are all reporting limits ≤ QAP Table 3?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
Are all methods as per QAP Table 3?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
Are dates of all analysis within holding times?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
COMMENTS
RM-1
RM-2R
RM-7
RM-8
RM-12
RM-14
RM-18
Duplicated as RM-100
RM-19
RM-20
DUP Fl was reanalyzed after hold because the RPD was outside QAP criteria. Renalysis yielded acceptable RPD.
(RM-100); duplicate of RM18
Tails Sump
YES NO Notes
Are Method Blanks < Lab Reporting Limits? ü
Are Lab Control Sample (LCS) %Rec within range? ü
Are MS & MSD %Rec within range?ü
Are MS\MSD RPD within range? ü
Are Blind Field Duplicate RPD's acceptable for all analytes?ü
RM-1 RM-2R RM-7 RM-8 RM-12 RM-14 RM-18 RM-19 RM-20 Tails Sump Blind Dup
LAB USE ONLY- Affix Workorder/Login Label Here or List Pace Workorder Number or
MTJL Log-in Number HereAnalytical
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY Analytical Request Document
Submitting a sample via this chain of custody constitutes acknow/ledgment and acceptance of the Pace Terms and
Conditions found at; https://info.pacelabs.com/hubfs/pas-standard-terms.pdf
Chain-of-Custody is a LEGAL DOCUMENT - Complete all relevant fields
Billing Information: on fileCompany: Anfield Resources ALL BOLD OUTLINED AREAS are for LAB USE ONLY
Address:
iLab Project Manager:Container Preservative Type
2 1 1 U
Report To: Toby Wright; 227 Jefferson St; Ft. Collins, Co
80524
Email To: [e-mail] . , ^
Preservative Types: (1) nitric acid, (2) sulfuric acid, (3) hydrochloric acid, (4) sodium hydroxide, (5) zinc acetate,
(6) methanol, (7) sodium bisulfate, (8) sodium thiosulfate, (9) hexane, (A) ascorbic acid, (B) ammonium sulfate,
(C) ammonium hydroxide, (D) TSP, (U) Unpreserved, (0) Other ^
Copy To: [e-mail] [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Site Collection info/Address: Shootaring Canyon Mill, Utah
Lab Profile/Line:Analyses
Customer Project Name/Number: Shootaring Canyon Mill State:Ut County/City: Garfield/Ticaboo Time Zone
Collected:Mountain Standard
T Lab Sample Receipt Checklist:
Custody Seals Present/Intact Y N NA
Custody Signatures Present
Collector Signature Present
Bottles Intact
Correct Bottles
Sufficient Volume
Samples Received on Ice
VGA - Headspace Acceptable
USDA Regulated Soils
Samples in Holding Time
Residual Chlorine Present
Cl Strips:
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
y N NA
Y N NA
Sample pH Acceptable
pH Strips:
Y N NA
Sulfide Present
Lead Acetate Strips:
Y N NA
O
3 COSite/Facility ID #:Compliance Monitoring?
P^Yes [ )No
Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
O)O
CD O+Q.Collected By (print): L Morrill O)Purchase Order#:
Quote#:
DW PWSID#:
DW Location Code:
<NI<ooc/>JD
Collected By (signature): ^ . j.inTurnaround Date Required:Immediately Packed on Ice:
0<Ves [ ]No
XQ.IS p
O T3(U C
Rush: (Expedite Charges Apply)
[ ] Same Day [ ) Next Day
[]2 Day [ 13 Day
[ ]4 Day [ )5 Day
Field Filtered (if applicable):
[ ]NopcYes
Sample Disposal:
[ 1 Dispose as appropriate
[ 1 Return
[ ] Archive:
[ JHold:
ID O3CDOOegoCMCCOo.+o a:oIAnalysis:u
O“D C(13 O N (/)Q-* Matrix Codes (Insert in Matrix box below): Drinking Water (DW), Ground Water (GW), Wastewater (WW),
Product (P), Soil/Solid (SL), Oil (OL), Wipe (WP), Air (AR), Tissue (TS), Bioassay (B), Vapor (V), Other (OT)
c<u D)<(DroO LAB USE ONLY:
Lab Sample # / Comments;
C oComp/# ofCollected (or
Composite Start)
Res 0)TOOQiComposite End COcmEMatrix ♦ClCustomer Sample ID Grab Ctns COJSEQinTimeDateTimeDateo<<u
grabRM-1 p 2 XGW
P 1 X
P X1 X
grab PRM-2R 2 XGW
P X1
p X1 X
RM-7 grab P 2 XGW
p X1
p X X1
LAB Sample Temperature Info:
Temp Blank Received: Y N NA
Therm ID#:
Cooler L Temp Upon Receipt: oC
Cooler 1 Therm Corr. Factor; oC
Cooler 1 Corrected Temp;
Comments
oC
Customer Remarks / Special Conditions / Possible Hazards: pype of Ice Used:SHORT HOLDS PRESENT (<72 hours) : Y N N/AWet Blue Dry None
tmoc.) -tc>
ni£»
r^AC.. h ● 1
Relinquished by/Comoan^(Signature) /LMcrri'll
Packing Material Used:Lab Tracking#:
Samples received via:
FEDEX UPS Client Courier Pace CourierRadchem sample(s) screened (<500 cpm):N NA
mby/Compyiy: (Signature)Date/Time:MTJL LAB USE ONLYDateAlme: ™
- - -
mpany: (S Mature)
Table #:
^ereiv^Relinquished by/(5ompany: (Signature)Trip Blank Received: Y N NA
HCL MeOH TSP Other
Date/Time:Acetnum:
Template:
Prelogin:
Date/Time:./
/Y
Non Conformancefsl: IPaae: .J
YES 7 NO $of:
Relinquished fcy/Company: (Signature)Date/Time:Date/Time:Received by/Company: (Signature)PM:ft -P B :
LAB USE ONLY- Affix Workorder/Login Label Here or List Pace Workorder Number or
MTJL Log-in Number Here
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY Analytical Request Document
ce Analytical'Submitting a sample via this chain of custody constitutes acknowledgment and acceptance of the Pace Terms and
Conditions found at: https://info.paceiabs.com/hubfs/pas-standard-terms.pdf
Chain-of-Custody is a LEGAL DOCUMENT - Complete all relevant fields
Company: Anfield Resources Billing Information: on file ALL BOLD OUTLINED AREAS are for LAB USE ONLY
Address:
lb Project Manager:Container Preservative Type
2 1 1 U
Report To: Toby Wright; 227 Jefferson St; Ft. Collins, Co
80524
Email To: WrightEnviagmail.com
* Pre s erv a tiv e T y p e s: (1) nitri c a cid, (2) s ulfuric a cid , (3) h ydroch loric a cid, (4) sodium h ydro xid e , (5) z inc a c e t a t e ,
(6) m e th a n ol, (7) so diu m bisu lf a t e , (8) sodiu m t hio s ulf a t e , (9) h e x a n e , (A) a s corbic a cid , (B) a m m on ium s ulf a t e ,
(C ) a mmo nium h y dro x id e , (D) T S P , (U ) U n pr e s erv e d, (0) O t h e r ^
S it e C o ll e c ti o n In fo/A ddr e ss : S ho o t a ri n g C a n y o n M ill , U t a hCopy T o: l a miy a morrilli a y a h o o .c o m s a g arlingi S) rd e in c.c o m
a prili a t wrig ht .c o m L a b Profil e /Lin e :A n a ly s e s
S t a t e :U t C o un ty/C ity : G a rfi e ld/T ic a b o o T im e Z o n e
C o ll e ct e d:M o u nt a i n S t a n d a rd
C u s tom e r Proj e c t N a m e /N umb e r: S ho ot arin g C a nyo n Mill L a b S a mp l e R e c e ip t C h e c klis t:
C u s t o dy S e a ls P r e s e nt/In t a c t Y N N A
C u sto d y S ig n a tur e s Pr e s e n t
C o ll e c t or S ig n a tur e Pr e s e n t Y N N A
Y N N A
Y N N A
Y N N A
Y N N A
Y N N A
Y N N A
Y N N A
Y N N A
Y N N A
B o t tl e s In t a c t
C orr e ct B o ttl e s
S u ffi ci e n t V o lu m e
S a m p l e s R e c e iv e d on Ic e
V G A - H e a ds p a c e A c c e p t a bl e
U S D A R e gul a t e d S o il s
S a m p l e s in H o l ding T im e
R e sid u a l C h lorin e P re s e n t
O
3 C OSite/F a c ility I D #:C ompli a n c e M o n itoring?
y i Y e s [ I N o
P h on e : 435-633-3035
E m a il: l a miy a morrilli a y a h o o .c o m
O )OtoO
-EQ.C OCollected B y (print): L Morrill P urc h a s e O rd e r#:
Q u ot e #:
D W P W SID #:
D W Lo c a ti on C od e :
<N
C l S trip s;
S a mp l e p H A c c e p t a b l e
p H S trip s;
S u lfi d e Pr e s e n t
L e a d A c e t a t e S tri p s;
I <ooU)42 Wid B y (sign a tur e ):T urn a rou n d D a t e R e quir e d:Im m e di a t e ly P a ck e d o n Ic e :
i X i v e s
F i e ld F ilt e re d (if a p plic a bl e ):
[ ]N o
-(D o
LO (D T DroCSample D is po s a l:
[ ] D is pos e a s a p propri a t e
[ ] R e t urn
[ ] A rc hiv e :
[ I H o ld:
R ush : (E x p e dit e C h arg e s A p ply)
[ ] S a m e D a y [ ] N e xt D a y
[ ]2 D a y [ ]3 D a y
[ ]4 D a y [ ]5 D a y
(UCD oCOo[ ]N o O C MYesoCMC(0CL+Y N N AoVCQ)uAnalysis:oOc Y N N AoN(/)C L* M a tri x C od e s (Ins e rt in M a tri x b ox b e lo w): D rink i n g W a t er (D W), G rou n d W a t e r (G W ), W a s t e w a t er (W W ),
Pro du c t (P ), S oil/S olid (S L), O il (O L), W i p e (W P ), A ir (A R ), T issu e (T S), B i o a s s a y (B ), V a p or (V), O th er (O T )
ccu O )<C DQ.C D o>-L A B U S E O N L Y ;
L a b S a m pl e # / C onra i e nts;C oComp/#ofCollected (or
C o mpo sit e S t a rt)
R e s 0)C DojOComposite E nd C QcCDEMatrix *C l C tn sCustomer S a m ple I D G r a b WfOEQCDC5in<D a t e T i m e D a t e T i m e <
gr a b I'l f pRM-8 2 XGW
P 1 X
P X1 X
R M-1 2 gr a b s o pGW 2 X
P 1 X
XP X1
X w /X P \ ^
p 2V X7
iLAB S a m ple T e mp e r a ture Info:
T e mp B l a n k R e c e i v e d; Y N N A
T h e rm I D #;
C o ol er 1 T e m p U p on R e c e ip t; o C
C o ol er 1 T h e rm C orr. F a c t or; o C
C o ol er 1 C orr e c t e d T e m p;
C o m m e n t s;
o C
C ust o m e r R e m a rks / S p e ci a l C on diti o ns / P o s si b l e H a z a rd s: j-y p e of Ic e U s e d:S H O R T H O L D S P R E S E N T (<7 2 h o urs): Y N N /AWet B lu e D ry N on e -I
L a b Tra cking #:P a c ki n g M a t e ri a l U s e d:
S a m ple s r e c e iv e d vi a :
F E D E X U P S C li e nt C o uri e r P a c e C o uri e rRadchem s a mp l e(s) s cr e e n e d (<5 0 0 c p m): Y N N A
D a t e /T i m e ^^^^^^^ R e ^l v^ by/C o m p a m:
D a t e A ic T V ^ R e c e iv e d by^o m p a n y: (S i^t u r e )
I)
.S
)
:(S i g n a ture )
,3 ^ '
D a t e/ri m a : .
O C c . 0-1 (l U Iw v h '
i ’ D a t e/T R n e :
R e li n quis h e d b y/C o mp a ny: (S i g n a ture )i M o r n j T /j^fr v i A J l P
M T J L L A B U S E O N L Y
T a bl e #:
T rip B l a nk R e c e iv e d: Y N N A
H C L M e O H T S P O t h e r
R e lin q uis h e d ^/C o m p a n y : (S ig n a t ure )A c ctnum:
T e m pl a t e :
P r e log in:
P M:
\’z h 7 :N on C o n form a nc e (s):
Y E S / N O
P a g e :R e li n quis h e d b y/C o nrtp a n y: (S i g n a ture )D a t e /T im e :R e c e iv e d b y/C o mp a ny: (S ig n a t ure )m e :
o f:1 ^:P B:
LAB USE ONLY- Affix Workorder/Login Label Here or List Pace Workorder Number or
MTJL Log-in Number HereAnalytical
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY Analytical Request Document
Submitting a sample via this chain of custody constitutes acknowledgment and acceptance of the Pace Terms and
Conditions found at; https://info.pacelabs.com/hubfs/pas-standard-terms.pdf
Chain-of“Custody is a LEGAL DOCUMENT - Complete all relevant fields
Billing Information: on fileCompany: Anfield Resources ALL BOLD OUTLINED AREAS are for LAB USE ONLY
Address:ILab Project Manager:Container Preservative Type
2 1 1 UReport To: Toby Wright; 227 Jefferson St; Ft. Coiiins, Co
80524
EmaiiTo: [e-mail]
** Preservative Types: (1) nitric acid, (2) suifuric acid, (3) hydrochioric add, (4) sodium hydroxide, (5) zinc acetate,
(6) methanoi, (7) sodium bisuifate, (8) sodium thiosulfate, (9) hexane, (A) ascorbic acid, (B) ammonium sulfate,
(C) ammonium hydroxide, (D) TSP, (U) Unpreserved, (O) Other ^
Site Collection Info/Address: Shootaring Canyon Mill, UtahCopy To: [e-mail] [e-mail]
[e-mail] Lab Profile/Line:Analyses
Customer Project Name/Number: Shootaring Canyon Mill State:Ut County/City: Garfield/Ticaboo Time Zone
Collected:Mountain Standard T Lab Sample Receipt Checklist:
Custody Seals Present/Intact Y N NA
Custody Signatures Present
Collector Signature Present
Bottles Intact
Correct Bottles
Sufficient Volume
Samples Received on Ice
VOA - Headspace Acceptable
USDA Regulated Soils
Samples in Holding Time
Residual Chlorine Present
Cl Strips:
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Sample pH Acceptable
pH Strips:
Y N NA
Sulfide Present
Lead Acetate Strips:
Y N NA
O
CO3Site/Facility ID #:Compliance Monitoring?
DW PWS ID #:
DW Location Code:
( ]No
Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
D>O
(0 O+a.O)Collected By (print): L Morrill Purchase Order#:
Quote #:
CNX<oo(/i
(AColle^ed By (signature):
S a mp l e D is po s a l: '
Im m e di a t e ly P a ck e d o n Ic e:T urn a rou n d D a t e R e quir e d:XQ.ID o
O[ ]N 0 T 3
CRush: (E x p e dit e C h a rg e s A p ply)
[ ] S a m e D a y [ ] N e xt D a y
[ ]2 D a y [ ]3 D a y
[ ]4 D a y [ ]5 D a y
F i e ld F ilt e re d (if a p p lic a b l e ):
[ ]N oYes
IP OCOO[ ] Dispos e a s a p pro pri a t e
[ ] R e t urn
[ ] A rchi v e :
[ ]H old:
o C SJoCVJc(0CL+o cr:0)uAnalysis:otoLOOcn>o N C OCL* M a tri x C o d e s (In s ert in M a tri x b ox b e l o w): D rin kin g W a t er (D W), G round W a t e r (G W), W a s t e w a t er (W W ),
Pro du c t (P ), S oil/S olid (S L), O il (O L), W i p e (W P ), A ir (A R ), T issu e (T S), B i o a s s a y (B), V a p or (V ), O th er (O T )
cQ}Q )<T Oa.(0 O>-L A B U S E O N L Y :
L a b S a m pl e # / C om m e nts:C oComp/#o fCollected (or
C om p o sit e S t a rt)
R e s 0)n jlUOComposite E nd WcCOEMatrix *G r a b C l C tnsCustomer S a m ple I D C Ore
QCOc(O<D a t e T i m e D a t e T im e ou 2
gr a b PRM-1 4 2 XGW
P 1 X
P X X1
_o o '?R M-1 8 gr a b P XGW2
P 1 X
XP X1
R M-1 9 gr a b P XGW2
P 1 X
P X1 X
L A B S a mpl e T e m p e ra tur e Info:
T e mp B l a n k R e c e iv e d: Y
T h erm I D #:
C o ol er 1 T e mp U p o n R e c e i p t: o C
N N A
C o ol er 1 T h e rm C orr. F a c t or:
C o ol er 1 C orr e c t e d T e m p:C omm e n t s:
C ust o m e r R e m arks / S p e ci a l C on diti o n s / P o s si b l e H a z a rd s: py pg of Ic e U s e d:S H O R T H O L D S P R E S E N T (<7 2 h o urs) : Y N N/AWet B lu e D ry N o n e
L a b T r a c kin g #:P a ckin g M a t e ri a l U s e d:
o CSamples r e c e iv e d vi a :
F E D E X U P S C li e n t C o uri e r P a c e C o uri e r o CRadchem s a mp l e(s) s cr e e n e d (<5 0 0 c pm): Y N N A
D a t e V im e :"S ?^^^R e li n quis h e d b y/C o mp a ny: (S i g n a ture )R e^J e iy e d b y/C g mp yi y: (S i g n a ture )
R e c e iv e d ^C o m p a n y^rg n a t ur e )
i U
M T J L L A B U S E O N L Y
T a ble #:
R dii^u i s h e d ^C o m p a n y: (S i g n a ture )D a t e/T irrydf Trip B l a n k R e c eiv e d: Y N N A
H C L M e O H T S P O th er
D a t e /T i m e :A cct n u m:
T e mpl a t e :
P r e l o gin:
N o n C o nform a nc e(s): I P a e e : ^
Y E S / N O o f:
R e c e iv e d b y/C om p a ny : (S ig n a t ure )D a t e /T im e :P M:R e li n quis h e d b y/C o m^n y : (S ign a tur e )D a t e /T i m e :
P B :
LAB USE ONLY- Affix Workorder/Login Label Here or List Pace Workorder Number or
MTJL Log-in Number HereAnalytical
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY Analytical Request Document
mowledgment and acceptance of the Pace Terms andSubmitting a sample via this chain of custody constitutes
Conditions found at; https;//info.pacelabs.com/hubfs/pas-standard-terms.pdf
Chain-of-Custody is a LEGAL DOCUMENT - Complete all relevant fields
Billing Information: on file ALL BOLD OUTLINED AREAS are for LAB USE ONLYCompany: Anfield Resources
Address:
iLab Project Manager:Container Preservative Type
2 1 1 U
Email To: WrightEnv@)gmail.comReport To: Toby Wright; 227 Jefferson St; Ft. Collins, Co
80524 Preservative Types: (1) nitric acid, (2) sulfuric add, (3) hydrochloric acid, (4) sodium hydroxide, (5) zinc acetate,
(6) methanol, (7) sodium bisulfate, (8) sodium thiosulfate, (9) hexane, (A) ascorbic acid, (B) ammonium sulfate,
(C) ammonium hydroxide, (D)TSP, (LI) Unpreserved, (O) OtherSite Collection Info/Address: Shootaring Canyon Mill, UtahCopy To: [e-mail] [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Lab Profile/Line:Analyses
Customer Project Name/Number: Shootaring Canyon Mill State:Ut County/City: Garfield/Ticaboo Time Zone
Collected:Mountain Standard
Lab Sample Receipt Checklist;
Custody Seals Present/Intact Y N NA
Custody Signatures Present
Collector Signature Present
Bottles Intact
Correct Bottles
Sufficient Volume
Samples Received on Ice
VGA - Headspace Acceptable
DSDA Regulated Soils
Samples in Holding Time
Residual Chlorine Present
Cl Strips;
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Sample pH Acceptable
pH Strips;
Y N NA
Sulfide Present
Lead Acetate Strips;
Y N NA
O
Z)COCompliance Monitoring?Site/Facility ID#:Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
05 o
[ ]No TOYes OSI+Q.D)Collected By (print): L Morrill Purchase Order#:
Quote #:
DW PWS ID #:
DW Location Code:
CM<X ooU)43
2Immediately Packed on Ice:
[ ]NoYes
Collected By (signature):Turnaround Date Required:XQ.19
V3CO o o(T3 c
R ush : (E x p e dit e C h a rg e s A p ply)
[ 1 S a m e D a y [ ] N e xt D a y
[ ]2 D a y [ ]3 D a y
[ ]4 D a y [ ]5 D a y
F i e ld F ilt e re d (if a p plic a bl e ):
[ ]N oJ/l Y e s
<DSample D is po s a l:
[ ] Dispos e a s a p pro pri a t e
[ ] R e t urn
[ ] A rc hiv e :
t ]H o ld:
19 O3CDooC^4oCMCCOOQ.+0 C L)yAnalysis:oTODc(O o N if)C l.* M a tri x C o d e s (Ins e rt in M a trix b ox b e l o w): D rin kin g W a t er (D W), G round W a t er (G W), W a s t e w a t er (W W ),
Pro du c t (P), S oil/S olid (S L), O il (O L), W i p e (W P ), A ir (A R ), T is s u e (T S), B io a ss a y (B ), V a p or (V ), O th er (O T )
c(U O )<<0o.O(0>L A B U S E O N L Y :
L a b S a m pl e # / C o mm e n t s:C O# ofComp/C oll e ct e d (or
C om p o sit e S t a rt)
R e s <D03OJOComposite E n d C OCDEMatrix *C l C tn sCustomer S a m ple ID G r a b C OfDEQ03cDateTimeDateTimeou<
^o o *?gr a b P XRM-2 0 G W 2
P 1 X
XP X1
^o (0grabRM-1 0 0 P 2 XGW‘i-l Z T A 9 M C C
P 1 X
P X1 X
' L o g li n g
w i s/i T i s ir gr a b 4'-tlr P n P 3 XGW
S e e W a d e f o r P 1 X
t h i s s a m p l e C ^c t t n e . C t p P X X1
L A B S a m pl e T e m p e ra tur e Info:
T e mp B l a n k R e c e iv e d: Y N N A
T h e rm I D #;
C oo l e r 1 T e m p U p on R e c e i p t: o C
C o ol er 1 T h e rm C orr. F a c t or: o C
C o ol er 1 C orr e ct e d T e mp:
C om m e nts:
o C
C ust o m e r R e m arks / S p e ci a l C o ndition s / P oss ibl e H a z a rd s:S H O R T H O L D S P R E S E N T (<7 2 h o urs) : Y N N /AType o f Ic e U s e d:W e t B lu e D ry N o n e
L a b Tra cking #:P a ckin g M a t e ri a l U s e d:
S a mpl e s r e c e iv e d vi a :
F E D E X U P S C li e n t C o uri e r P a c e C ouri e rRadchem s a m pl e (s) s cr e e n e d (<S O O cp m): Y N N A
D a t e /T im e^a O «^D a t e /T '^e :M T J L L A B U S E O N L YRelinquished b y/C om p a ny : (S ign a tur e )
L M f o r n l//J ^r 3 M A f J
’/C o m Mny: (S ign a tur e )R e linquish
ly/C o mp a n yM S ig n a t ur e )R e c e i
(S i g iJitur e ) ^
T a bl e it:
W c e i v e d b y/^m p a n y:Trip B l a nk R e c eiv e d: Y N N A
H C L M e O H T S P O t h e r
A cct n u m:
T e m pl a t e :
P r e log in:
D a t e A i m e :D a t e A im e f
2 5 T 'Z B
N o n C o n form a nc e (s):
Y E S / N O
D a t e /T i m e :P a g e :R e c e iv e d b y/C om p a ny : (S ign a tur e )P M:R e lin q uis h e d b y/C ora p a n y: (S ign a tur e )D a t e A im e :
o f:P B :
DC#_Title: ENV-FRM-SHRT-0033 v02_Condition Upon Receipt Form Terra Lab
Effective Date: 4/24/2023
Survey Meter # Model 2241-2; SN 182119
pH strip lot # HC210330
Thermometer SN# 221511272
a hS/MfOCondition Upon Receipt (Attach to COC) Of
Sample Receipt
1 Number of ice chests/packages received:
Note as “OTC" if samples are received over the counter, unpackaged
2 Temperature of cooler/samples, (if more than 8 coolers, obtain an additional CUR form.)
Temps Observed (°C): fQ^O
Temps Corrected (°C): p.o
Acceptable is: Q.V to 10°C for Bacteria; and 0.1 6.°C most other water parameters. Samples may not have had adequate time to cool
following collection. Indicate ROI (Received on Ice) for iced ^mples received on the same day as sampled, in addition to temperature at receipt.
y ROI?No’e;
0.0
o o
Client contact for temperatures outside method criteria must be documented below.
3 Emission rate of samples for radiochemical analyses < 0.5mR/hr?
4 COC Number (If applicable):
5 Do the number of bottles agree with the COC?
6 Were the samples received intact? (no broken bottles, leaks, etc.)
7 Were the sample custody seals intact?
8 Is the COC properly completed, legible, and signed?
Sample Verification. Labeling & Distribution
1 Were all requested analyses understood and appropriate?
2 Did the bottle labels correspond with the COC information?
3 Samples collected in method-prescribed containers?
4 Sample Preservation:
pH at Receipt:
Total Metals
Final pH (if added in lab):
Total Metals
Preserva
N/ANoTe;
No N/A
No N/A
Yes No
No
No
No
No
tive/Lot#
HNO3
Filtered and preserved in metals
H2SO4
NaOH
Date/Time Added:
^ f Diss Metals Filtered and preserved in metalsDiss Metals _
Nutrient _
Cyanide _
Sulfide
Phenol _
SDWA Rads
5 VOA vials have <6mm headspace?
6 Were all analyses within holding time at the time of receipt?
7 Have rush or project due dates been checked and accepted?
8 Do samples require subcontracted analyses?
If "Yes", which type of subcontracting is required?
Sample Receipt, Verification, Login, Labeling & Distribution completed by (initials):
Nutrient
Cyanide
Sulfide
Phenol
ZnAcet
H2SO4
HNOj,SDWA Rads
Yes
Yes
Yes
General Custo
No
No
No
CS9
mer-Specified Certified
Set ID:
Discrepancy Documentation (use back of sheet for notes on discrepancies)
Any items listed above with a response of "No" or do not meet specifications must be resolved.
Person Contacted:Method of Contact: Phone:
Initiated By^^
Problem:
Date/Time:Email:
Resolution:
Qualtrax ID: 70962 Pace® Analytical Services, LLC Page 1 of 1
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
6DPSOHV5050505050505050550DQG50ZHUHUHFHLYHGRQ$SULO
$OOVDPSOHVZHUHUHFHLYHGDQGDQDO\]HGZLWKLQUHFRPPHQGHGKROGLQJWLPHVH[FHSWWKRVHQRWHGEHORZLQWKLVFDVHQDUUDWLYH
6DPSOHVZHUHDQDO\]HGXVLQJPHWKRGVRXWOLQHGLQWKHIROORZLQJUHIHUHQFHV
6WDQGDUG0HWKRGVIRUWKH([DPLQDWLRQRI:DWHUDQG:DVWHZDWHUDSSURYHGPHWKRGYHUVLRQV
(3$7HVW0HWKRGVIRU(YDOXDWLQJ6ROLG:DVWH3K\VLFDO&KHPLFDO0HWKRGV6:RQOLQHYHUVLRQV
(3$PHWKRGV&)53DUWVDQG(3$PHWKRGV
1'(30LQLQJ0HWKRGV
&)53DUW$SSHQGLFHV%-/2DQG)(0(4/
,2&RPSHQGLXP0HWKRGV
&OHDQ:DWHU$FW0HWKRGV8SGDWH5XOHIRUWKH$QDO\VLVRI(IIOXHQWFXUUHQWYHUVLRQ
$670DSSURYHGDQGUHFRJQL]HGVWDQGDUGV
,62DSSURYHGDQGUHFRJQL]HGVWDQGDUGV
86'$+DQGERRN
6RLO6XUYH\/DERUDWRU\0DQXDO9HU
$6$666$0HWKRGVRI$QDO\VLV3DUW
$6$666$0HWKRGVRI$QDO\VLV%RRN3DUW
2WKHULQGXVWU\DSSURYHGPHWKRGV

$OO4XDOLW\&RQWUROSDUDPHWHUVPHWWKHDFFHSWDQFHFULWHULDGHILQHGE\(3$DQG3DFH$QDO\WLFDOH[FHSWDVLQGLFDWHGLQWKLV
FDVHQDUUDWLYH
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6HUYLFHV,Q
/DE2UGHU6
&$6(1$55$7,9(
5HSRUW,'6
:DGH1LHXZVPD/DERUDWRU\2SHUDWLRQV0DQDJHU
(QWLUH5HSRUW5HYLHZHGE\
3DJHRI
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
'HILQLWLRQV
5/ 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW
4XDOLILHUV

9DOXHH[FHHGV0D[LPXP&RQWDPLQDQW/HYHO
$&KHFN06$VSHFLILFDWLRQV
%$QDO\WHGHWHFWHGLQWKHDVVRFLDWHG0HWKRG%ODQN
&&DOFXODWHG9DOXH
'5HSRUWOLPLWUDLVHGGXHWRGLOXWLRQ
(9DOXHDERYHTXDQWLWDWLRQUDQJH
*$QDO\]HGDW3DFH*LOOHWWH:<ODERUDWRU\
++ROGLQJWLPHVIRUSUHSDUDWLRQRUDQDO\VLVH[FHHGHG
-$QDO\WHGHWHFWHGEHORZTXDQWLWDWLRQOLPLWV
/$QDO\]HGE\DQRWKHUODERUDWRU\
09DOXHH[FHHGV0RQWKO\$YHRU0&/RULVOHVVWKDQ/&/
1' 1RW'HWHFWHGDWWKH5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW
22XWVLGHWKH5DQJHRI'LOXWLRQV
553'RXWVLGHDFFHSWHGUHFRYHU\OLPLWV
66SLNH5HFRYHU\RXWVLGHDFFHSWHGUHFRYHU\OLPLWV
8$QDO\WHEHORZPHWKRGGHWHFWLRQOLPLW
;0DWUL[(IIHFW
3DJHRI
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
&KORULGH  PJ/(3$$%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& .$7
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ $0%
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ $0%
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% .$7
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 -06
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/(3$-*8
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'505
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH30
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
&KORULGH  PJ/ (3$ $%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& .$7
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ $0%
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ $0%
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% .$7
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 -06
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/(3$-*8
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'505
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH30
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP 1' S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“ 1$ S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH30
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
&KORULGH  PJ/(3$$%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& .$7
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ $0%
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ $0%
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% .$7
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 -06
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/(3$-*8
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH30
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH30
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
&KORULGH  PJ/ (3$ $%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& .$7
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ $0%
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ $0%
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% .$7
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 -06
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF  PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/(3$-*8
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH30
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
&KORULGH  PJ/ (3$ $%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& .$7
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ $0%
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ $0%
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% .$7
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 -06
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/(3$-*8
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH30
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
&KORULGH  PJ/(3$$%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& .$7
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ $0%
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ $0%
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% .$7
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 -06
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/(3$-*8
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH30
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP 1' S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“ 1$ S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH30
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
&KORULGH  PJ/(3$$%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& .$7
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ $0%
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ $0%
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% .$7
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 -06
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/(3$-*8
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH30
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH30
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
&KORULGH  PJ/(3$$%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& .$7
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ $0%
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ $0%
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% .$7
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 -06
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/(3$-*8
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH30
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH30
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
&KORULGH  PJ/ (3$ $%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& .$7
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ $0%
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ $0%
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% .$7
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 -06
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF  PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/(3$-*8
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH30
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP 1' S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“ 1$ S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
&KORULGH  PJ/(3$$%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& .$7
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ $0%
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ $0%
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% .$7
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 -06
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/(3$-*8
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$ONDOLQLW\6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R%/$1.
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2 1'
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2 1'
$ONDOLQLW\7RWDO$V&D&2 1'
$ONDOLQLW\6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R$74&
$ONDOLQLW\7RWDO$V&D&2
&RQGXFWLYLW\E\60%6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWV—PKRVFP
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R%/$1.
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\ 1'
&RQGXFWLYLW\E\60%6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWV —PKRVFP
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R $74&
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\
&RQGXFWLYLW\E\60%6DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWV—PKRVFP
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$'
 (OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\ 
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
'LVVROYHG0HUFXU\E\(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R0%
0HUFXU\ 1'
'LVVROYHG0HUFXU\E\(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R/&6
0HUFXU\
'LVVROYHG0HUFXU\E\(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWV PJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6
 1'0HUFXU\
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6
 1'0HUFXU\
'LVVROYHG0HUFXU\E\(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6'
 0HUFXU\
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6'
 0HUFXU\
'LVVROYHG0HUFXU\E\(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6''
1' 0HUFXU\ 1'
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R 6''
1' 0HUFXU\ 1'
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&3(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R0%/.',66&$7
=LQF 1'
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&3(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R',66/&6
=LQF 
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&3(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWV PJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6
 1'=LQF 
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&3(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6'
 =LQF 
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&3(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6''
1' =LQF 1'
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&306(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R0%/.
$UVHQLF 1'
%DULXP 1'
&DGPLXP 1'
&KURPLXP 1'
&RSSHU 1'
/HDG 1'
0RO\EGHQXP 1'
6HOHQLXP 1'
6LOYHU 1'
8UDQLXP 1'
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&306(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R/&6
$UVHQLF 
%DULXP 
&DGPLXP 
&KURPLXP 
&RSSHU 
/HDG 
0RO\EGHQXP 
6HOHQLXP 
6LOYHU 
8UDQLXP 
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&306(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6
 1'$UVHQLF 
 %DULXP 
 1'&DGPLXP 
 1'&KURPLXP 
 1'&RSSHU 
 1'/HDG 
 1'0RO\EGHQXP 
 1'6HOHQLXP 
 1'6LOYHU 
 8UDQLXP 
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6
 1'$UVHQLF 
 %DULXP 
 1'&DGPLXP 
 1'&KURPLXP 
 1'&RSSHU 
 1'/HDG 
 1'0RO\EGHQXP 
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&306(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6
 1'6HOHQLXP 
 1'6LOYHU 
 8UDQLXP 
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&306(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'06'
 $UVHQLF 
 %DULXP 
 &DGPLXP 
 &KURPLXP 
 &RSSHU 
 /HDG 
 0RO\EGHQXP 
 6HOHQLXP 
 6LOYHU 
 8UDQLXP 
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'06'
 $UVHQLF 
 %DULXP 
 &DGPLXP 
 &KURPLXP 
 &RSSHU 
 /HDG 
 0RO\EGHQXP 
 6HOHQLXP 
 6LOYHU 
 8UDQLXP 
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&306(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6''
1' $UVHQLF 1'
 %DULXP 
1' &DGPLXP 1'
1' &KURPLXP 1'
1' &RSSHU 1'
1' /HDG 1'
1' 0RO\EGHQXP 1'
1' 6HOHQLXP 1'
1' 6LOYHU 1'
 8UDQLXP 
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6''
1' $UVHQLF 1'
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&306(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6''
 %DULXP 
1' &DGPLXP 1'
1' &KURPLXP 1'
1' &RSSHU 1'
1' /HDG 1'
1' 0RO\EGHQXP 1'
1' 6HOHQLXP 1'
1' 6LOYHU 1'
 8UDQLXP 
)OXRULGHE\606DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R%/$1.
)OXRULGH 1'
)OXRULGHE\606DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R$74&
)OXRULGH 
)OXRULGHE\606DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R 6$63.06
 )OXRULGH 
)OXRULGHE\606DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$63.06'
 )OXRULGH 
)OXRULGHE\606DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$'
 )OXRULGH 
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
*URVV$OSKD%HWDE\60%6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVS&L/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R0%/.
*URVV$OSKD'LVVROYHG 1'
*URVV$OSKD%HWDE\60%6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVS&L/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R/&6$
*URVV$OSKD'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD%HWDE\60%6DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWV S&L/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6(06$
 *URVV$OSKD'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD%HWDE\60%6DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVS&L/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6(06'$
 *URVV$OSKD'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD%HWDE\60%6DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWVS&L/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6&'83
 *URVV$OSKD'LVVROYHG 
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQVE\,21&KURPDWRJUDSK\6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R%/.
&KORULGH 1'
6XOIDWH 1'
$QLRQVE\,21&KURPDWRJUDSK\6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R/&6
&KORULGH 
6XOIDWH 
$QLRQVE\,21&KURPDWRJUDSK\6DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$63.
 &KORULGH 
 6XOIDWH 
$QLRQVE\,21&KURPDWRJUDSK\6DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWV PJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$63.'
 &KORULGH 
 6XOIDWH 
$QLRQVE\,21&KURPDWRJUDSK\6DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R 6$'
 &KORULGH 
 6XOIDWH 
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
&DWLRQVE\,&30HWKRG6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R0%/.',66&$7
&DOFLXP 1'
0DJQHVLXP 1'
3RWDVVLXP 1'
6RGLXP 1'
&DWLRQVE\,&30HWKRG6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R',66/&6
&DOFLXP 
0DJQHVLXP 
3RWDVVLXP 
6RGLXP 
&DWLRQVE\,&30HWKRG6DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R 6$6
 &DOFLXP 
 0DJQHVLXP 
 3RWDVVLXP 
 6RGLXP 
&DWLRQVE\,&30HWKRG6DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWV PJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R 6$6'
 &DOFLXP 
 0DJQHVLXP 
 3RWDVVLXP 
 6RGLXP 
&DWLRQVE\,&30HWKRG6DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWV PJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$'
 &DOFLXP 
 0DJQHVLXP 
 3RWDVVLXP 
 6RGLXP 
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLDDV16DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R:&%
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLDDV1 1'
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLDDV16DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R,&9
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLDDV1
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLDDV16DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWV PJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6&
 1'1LWURJHQ$PPRQLDDV1
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLDDV16DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6&
 1LWURJHQ$PPRQLDDV1
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV16DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R0%/.
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1 1'
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV16DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWV PJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R/&6
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV16DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6&
 1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6&
 1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV16DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R 6&
 1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6&
 1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLXPLQ:DWHU'LVVROYHG 6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVS&L/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R3UHS'DWH%DWFK,'0%
5DGLXP'LVVROYHG 1'
5DGLXPLQ:DWHU'LVVROYHG 6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVS&L/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R3UHS'DWH%DWFK,'/&6
5DGLXP'LVVROYHG
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R  3UHS'DWH  %DWFK,' /&6
5DGLXP'LVVROYHG
5DGLXPLQ:DWHU'LVVROYHG 6DPSOH7\SH /&6'8QLWVS&L/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R3UHS'DWH%DWFK,'/&6'
 5DGLXP'LVVROYHG
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R3UHS'DWH%DWFK,'/&6'
 5DGLXP'LVVROYHG
5DGLXPLQ:DWHU'LVVROYHG 6DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWVS&L/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R3UHS'DWH%DWFK,'6(06
 5DGLXP'LVVROYHG
5DGLXPLQ:DWHU'LVVROYHG 6DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVS&L/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R3UHS'DWH%DWFK,'6(06'
 5DGLXP'LVVROYHG
6LOLFDDV6L26DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWV PJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R0%/.',66&$7
6LOLFDDV6L2 1'
6LOLFDDV6L26DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R',66/&6
6LOLFDDV6L2
6LOLFDDV6L26DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6''
 6LOLFDDV6L2 
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
6ROLGV%\606DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R',
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV 1'
6ROLGV%\606DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R&21752/
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV
6ROLGV%\606DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWV PJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$
 7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV 
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$
 7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV 
3DJHRI
Shootaring Canyon Mill
SHOOTARING CANYON MILL GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM
QAP FIELD SAMPLING CHECKLIST
Sample Collection Date: 4/22/2023 and 4/24/2023
Reviewer\Date: April Lafferty 05/31/2023
RM-100
Field Sampling YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO
Meter function check OK & Recorded?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
Water level recorded to 0.01 feet?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
Well casing volume correctly calculated?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
Pumping rate determined and recorded?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
Field Parameter Stabilization
Minimum interval achieved?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
3 readings with pH ± 0.2 s.u.; Conductivity ± 10% ?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
Sufficient minimum well volume pumped?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
Sample bottles & preservatives correct and recorded?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
COMMENTS
RM-1 Blind Field Dup as RM100
RM-2R
RM-7
RM-8
RM-12 well was sampled when approximately one gallon is left to ensure a sample is collected before the water level reaches the pump
RM-14
RM-18
RM-19
RM-20
DUP Blind Field Dup of RM1
Tails
Blind DupBlind DupRM-12 RM-14 RM-18 RM-19 Tails SumpRM-1 RM-2R RM-7 RM-8 RM-20
Shootaring Canyon Mill
SHOOTARING CANYON MILL GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM
QAP DATA COMPLETENESS & DATA PACKAGE QA/QC CHECKLIST
Sample Collection Date: 4/22/2023 and 4/24/2023 Report Date\Work Order No.: S2304349
Reviewer\Date: April Lafferty 05/31/2023
Data Completeness YES NO YES NO
Lab certification still current?ü Is Lab QA\QC summary report present?ü
Is receipt temperature, between 0.1 and 6 degrees C?ü Do all samples sent have reported analyses (QAP Table 3)?ü
Chain of Custody complete and intact as per approved QAP?ü Were all analytes requested reported (QAP Table 3)?ü
Received w/ custody seals intact?ü Are all field forms present from field site?ü
RM-100
Data Package QA\QC YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO
Are all reporting limits ≤ QAP Table 3?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
Are all methods as per QAP Table 3?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
Are dates of all analysis within holding times?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
COMMENTS
RM-1
Duplicated as RM-100
RM-2R
RM-7
RM-8
RM-12
RM-14
RM-18
RM-19
RM-20
DUP
(RM-100); duplicate of RM1
Tails Sump
YES NO Notes
Are Method Blanks < Lab Reporting Limits? ü
Are Lab Control Sample (LCS) %Rec within range? ü
Are MS & MSD %Rec within range?ü
Are MS\MSD RPD within range? ü
Are Blind Field Duplicate RPD's acceptable for all analytes?ü
RM-1 RM-2R RM-7 RM-8 RM-12 RM-14 RM-18 RM-19 RM-20 Tails Sump Blind Dup
rAnalytical
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY Analytical Request Document LAB USE ONLY- Affix Workorder/Login Label Here or List Pace Workorder Number or
MTJL Log-in Number HereSubmitting a sample via this chain of custody constitutes acknowledgment and acceptance of the Pace Terms and
Conditions found at: https://inf0.pacelab5.com/hubfs/pas-standard-terms.pdf
Chain-of-Custody Is a LEGAL DOCUMENT - Complete all relevant fields
Company: Anfield Resources Billing Information: on file ALL BOLD OUTLINED AREAS are for LAB USE ONLY
Address:^ If IContainer Preservative Type a b P roj e ct M a n a g e r:
R e p ort T o: T ob y Wright; 2 2 7 J e ff ers o n S t; F t. C ollin s , C o
8 0 5 2 4
2 1 1Email T o: Wri g ht E n v @ g m a ii.co m **Pre s erv a tiv e T yp e s: (1) nitric a cid , (2) su lfuric a cid, (3) h y dro c hloric a cid, (4) s odiu m hy droxid e , (5) z in c a c e t a t e ,
(6) m e th a n ol, (7) sodiu m bisulf a t e , (8) s o dium t hio su lf a t e , (9) h e x a n e , (A ) a sc orbic a cid , (B) a m mo n i u m sulf a te ,
(C ) a m m on ium h y droxid e , (D) T S P, (U ) U npre s e rv e d, (0) O th er
C opy T o: l a m i y a morrill @ y a h oo .com s a g a rli n g @ rd e inc .c o m
a pril @ t wrig ht.co m
S it e C oll e ctio n In fo/A d dr e ss : S ho o t a ri n g C a nyo n Mill, U t a h
A n a lys e s U b Profil e/Lin e :C u s tom e r Proj e c t N a m e /N u mb e r: S ho ot arin g C a nyo n Mill S t a t e :U t C ou nt y/C ity : G a rfi e ld/T ic a b o o T i m e Z o n e
C oll e ct e d:M o un t a i n S t a n d a rd O L a b S a m pl e R e c e i p t C h e c k li s t:
C u sto d y S e a ls P r e s e n t/Int a c t Y N N A
C us t od y S i gn a t ur e s Pr e s e n t
C o ll e ct or S ig n a t ur e P r e s e n t Y N N A
Y N N A
Y N N A
Y N N A
Y N N A
Y N N A
Y N N A
Y N N A
Y N N A
Y N N A
B o ttl e s In t a ct
C orr e ct B ot tl e s
S u ffic i e n t V o lu m e
S a m pl e s R e c e i v e d o n Ic e
V O A - H e a d sp a c e A c c e pt a b l e
U S D A R e g ul a t e d S o il s
S a m p l e s in H oldi n g T i m e
R e sid u a l C h l ori n e P re s e n t
P hon e : 435-6 3 3-3035
E m a il: l a miy a morrilt @ y a h oo.c om
S it e /F a c lllty ID #:C o m p li a n c e M o nit orin g ?
[ 1 Y e s [ ] N o
3 C Oo>O5o-I-C oll e c t e d B y (print): L M orrill P urch a s e O rd er #:
Q u ot e ff:
D W P W S I D #:
D W Loc a tion C o d e :
Q .O )C Mo
C l S tri p s:
S a mp l e p H A c c e pt a bl e
p H S trip s: S u lfi d e P r e s e nt
L e a d A c e t a t e S trip s :
X <oCollected B y (sign a tur e ):S iTurnaround D a t e R e quir e d:Im m e di a t e ly P a ck e d on Ic e :
[ l Y e s [ ]N o
XIDo.u .oV,T 3V,
S a m pl e D is po s a l:
( ) D is pos e a s a p propri a t e
( ) R e t urn
I ] A rchi v e ;
( j H old:
R u s h: (E x p e dit e C h arg e s A pply)
[ 1 S a m e D a y [ ] N e xt D a y
[ )2 D a y [ ]3 D a y
[ ]4 D a y [ )5 D a y
cField F ilt e re d (if a p p lic a b l e ):
[ ]Y e s [ ]N o
0)1 5 oC±
3 C D ooCMoiCMchdJ
u .(0CLoa:Y N N AAnalysis:u M-oT3C Y N N AoNCO M a tri x C o d e s (Ins e rt In M a trix bo x b e l ow): D ri nkin g W a t er (D W), G round W a t e r (G W ), W a st e w a t er (W W ),
Prod uc t (P), S oil/S olld (S L), O il (O L , W ip e (W P), A ir (A R ), T issu e (T S), B lo a ss a y (B ), V a por (V ), O t h er (O T )
.tdaC (C(b O L A B U S E O N L Y ;
L a b S a m ple it / C o mm e n t s:C o m p/C oll e c t e d (or
C omposit e S t a rt)
R e s (fo f O(l >o (CComposite E n dCustomer S a mp l e ID c C OMatrix *C DGrabEClCtns C OeQ(bDateTime(/><D a t e T i m e ou <R M -l gr a bGW P 2 X
P 1 X
P 1 X X
R M-2 R gr a bGW P 2 X —
P 1 X
P 1 X XRM-7 gr a bGW P 2 X
P 1 X
P 1 X X
C ust o m e r R e m arks / S p e cia l C on ditio ns / P o s si b l e H a z ard s;T yp e of Ic e U s e d:L A B S a mpl e T e m p e ra tur e Info :
T e mp B l a n k R e c:e i v e d: Y N N A
T h e rm I D #:
C o ol e r 1 T e mp U p on R e c e ipt: o C
C o ol e r 1 T h e rm C orr. F a c t or: o C
C o o l e r 1 C orre c t e d T e m p:
C orm n e nts:
o C
W e t B lu e D ry N on e S H O R T H O L D S P R E S E N T (<7 2 h ours) : Y N N/A
P a ck ing M a t eri a l U s e d:L a b Tr a c kin g #:
^d c h e m s a m p l e (s^cr e e n^(<5 0 0 c p^ Q S a m pl e s r e c e iv e d vi a:
F E D E X U P S C li e nt C o uri e r P a c e C o uri e rN N A
R e li n q uis h e d b y/c :om p a n y: (S ign a tur e )
R e li n q uis h e d b y/C o mp a ny: (S ign a tur e )
D a t e /T im e :
D a t e /T i m e ;
R e c e iv e d b y/C om p a ny : f S ign a t ujj e )D a t e /T im e :
D a t e /T im e ;
M T JL L A B U S E O N L Y
T a bl e It:
A cct n u m:T ri p B la nk R e c e i v e d:
H C L M e O H T S P O t h er
N A
R e lin quis h e d b y/C o mp a ny: (S ign a tur e ) ^
^//7 /'A T T e m p l a t e ;' P r e log in:
P M:
d 7
D a t e /T i m e :N on C o nf orm a n c e(s); P a g e : I
Y E S / N O of: ^
R e c e iv e d b y/C o m p a ny : (S ign a tur e )D a t e /T im e :
P B :
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY Analytical Request Document LAB USE ONLY- Affix Workorder/Login Label Here or List Pace Workorder Number or
MTJL Log-in Number HereceAnalyticalSubmitting a sample via this chain of custody consUtutes acknowledgment and acceptance of the Pace Terms and
Conditions found at: https://lnfo.pacelabs.com/hubfs/pas-standard-terms.pdf
Chain-of-CustodYlsalEGAL DOCUMENT - Complete all relevant fields
Company: Anfleld Resources Billing Information: on file ALL BOLD OUTLINED AREAS are for LAB USE ONLY
Address:
Container Preservative Type a*iLab Project Manager:
2 1 1 UReport To: Toby Wright; 227 Jefferson St; Ft. Collins, Co
80524
Email To; [e-mail]
●● Preservative Types: (1) nitric acid, (2) sulfuric acid, (3) hydrochloric add, (4) sodium hydroxide, (5) zinc acetate,
(6) methanol, (7) sodium bisulfate, (8) sodium thiosulfate, (9) hexane, (A) ascorbic add, (B) ammonium sulfate,
(C| ammonium hydroxide, (D| TSP, (U) Unpreserved, (0) Other
Copy To: [e-mail] [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Site Collection Info/Address: Shootaring Canyon Mill, Utah
Analyses Lab Profile/Line:Customer Project Name/Number: Shootaring Canyon Mill State:Ut County/City: Garfield/ Ticaboo Time Zone
Collected:Mountaln Standard O Lab Sample Receipt Checklist:
Custody Seals Present/Intact Y N NA
Custody Signatures Present
Collector Signature Present Y N NA
Bottles Intact
Correct Bottles
Sufficient Volume
Samples Received on Ice
VGA - Headspace Acceptable
USDA Regulated Soils
Samples in Holding Time
Residual Chlorine Present
Cl Strips:
Y N NA
y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Sample pH Acceptable
pH Strips:
Y N NA
Sulfide Present
Lead Acetate Strips:
Y N NA
Phone; 435-633-3035
Email: [e-mail]
Site/Facility ID#:=)COCompliance Monitoring?
[ ) Yes [ ] No
O)OtoOI-C o ll e ct e d B y (print): L M orrill cnPurchase O rd e r #;
Q u ot e #:
Q .D W P W S I D #:
D W L o c a tio n C od e :
C MX<Oo<njaCollected B y (sign a t ure );T urn a rou n d D a t e R e quir e d:Im m e di a t e ly P a ck e d on Ic e:
[ ]Y e s [ ]N o
iD <02 X0.
IS C D T 3mSample D isp os a l;
( ) D ispo s e a s a p pro pri a t e
1 1 R e t urn
[ 1 Arch iv e:
I IH old:
R u s h: (E x p e dit e C h arg e s A pply)
( 1 S a m e D a y [ ] N e xt D a y
[ ]2 D a y [ ] 3 D a y
[ ]4 D a y[ ]5 D a y
cField F ilt er e d (if a p plic a bl e ):
[ l Y e s [ I N o
(p o3COOOCMo
Q .+o D £mIAnalysis:U sacrooN(O* M a trix C od e s (In s ert in M a trix b ox b e low): D ri nkin g W a t e r (D W), G round W a t er (G W), W a st e w a t er (W W ),
Pro du c t (P ), S oil/S olid (S L), O il (O L), W i p e (W P), A ir (A R ), T i s su e (T S), B lo a ss a y (B), V a p or (V), O th er (O T )
a .C0)O )<(UQ.(0 o>*L A B U S E O N L Y :
L a b S a m pl e # / C o mm e n t s;CComp/C oll e c t e d (or
C o m p o s it e S t a rt)
#o fRes OI0)C O(DOComposite E n dCustomer S a mpl e I D M a tri x C QGrabEClCtns C OE<QmcDateTime(/)D a t e T im e Qu <z h-
R M -8 gr a bGW P 2 X ^o o'y
P 1 X
P X1 X
R M-1 2 gr a bGW P 2 X
P 1 X
P X1 X
R I V N r^A T \G W ^, gr a bZ 2 X
XS7
C u sto m e r R e m arks / S p e ci a l C on diti o n s / P o s sibl e H a z ard s: T yp e of Ic e U s e d:L A B S a mpl e T e mp er a t ur e Info ;
T e mp B l a n k R e c e iv e d: Y
T h e rm ID fl:
C o ol er 1 T e mp U p o n R e c e i p t:
C oo l e r 1 T h e rm C orr. F a c tor:
C o ol er 1 C orr e c t e d T e m p:
N
C o m m e n t s:
W e t B lu e D ry N o n e S H O R T H O L D S P R E S E N T (<7 2 h ours): Y N N /A N APacking M a t e ri a l U s e d:L a b Tr a c k i n g #;
o C
o CSamples r e c e iv e d vi a :
F E D E X U P S C li e nt C o uri e r P a c e C o uri e rRadchem s a mpl e (s) s cre e n e d (<5 0 0 c p m): Y N N A o C
R e lin quis h e d by/C oro p a n y: (S i g n a ture ) ,t M a y-n 7 /7'D a t e /T im e :R e c e iv e d b y/C o mp a ny: (S lgn^ur e )D a t e/T im e :
//c ^
M T J L L A B U S E O N L Y
K 'Z O F a bl e #:
R erinquish e d b y/C o mp a ny: (S i g n a ture )D a t e /T im e :R e c e iv e d ^/C o m p a if y : (S ig n a tu
f U t
D a t e /T im e ;Trip B l a n k R e c e iv e d; Y N N A
H C L M e O H T S P O th er
A c c tn u m:
T e mpl a t e :
P r e log in:
P M:
5/:-—'I W ^a if\K A .^R e li n qu i s h e d b y/(»mp a n y: (S ig n a t ur e )^
hZ TDate/rtm e :R e c e iv e d b y/C om p a ny : (S i g n a ture )D a t e /T i m e :N o n C o nf orm a n c e(s): P a g e :
Y E S / N O of:P B:
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY Analytical Request Document LAB USE ONLY- Affix Workorder/Login Label Here or List Pace Workorder Number or
MTJL Log-in Number HereceAnalyticalSubmitting a sample via this chain of custody constitutes acknowledgment and acceptance of the Pace Terms and
Conditions found at: https://lnfo.pacelabs.com/hubfs/pas-standard-terms.pdf
Chain-of-Custody is a LEGAL DOCUMENT - Complete all relevant fields
/
Company: Anfleld Resources Billing Information: on file ALL BOLD OUTLINED AREAS are for LAB USE ONLY
Address:
Container Preservative Type iLab Project Manager:
Report To: Toby Wright; 227 Jefferson St; Ft. Collins, Co
80524
2 1 1 UEmail To: [e-mail]
Preservative Types: (1) nitric add, (2) sulfuric acid, (3) hydrochloric acid, (4) sodium hydroxide, (5) zinc acetate,
(6) methanol, (7) sodium bisulfate, (8) sodium thiosulfate, (9) hexane, (A) ascorbic acid, (B) ammonium sulfate,
(C) ammonium hydroxide, (D)TSP, (U) Unpreserved, (O) Other
Copy To: [e-mail] [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Site Collection Info/Address: Shootaring Canyon Mill, Utah
Analyses Lab Proflle/Llne:Customer Project Name/Number: Shootaring Canyon Mill State:Ut County/City: Garfield/ Ticaboo Time Zone
Collected:Mountaln Standard O Lab Sample Receipt Checklist:
Custody Seals Present/Intact Y N NA
Custody Signatures Present
Collector Signature Present Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Bottles Intact
Correct Bottles
Sufficient Volume
Samples Received on Ice
VOA - Headspace Acceptable
USDA Regulated Soils
Samples in Holding Time
Residual Chlorine Present
2
Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Site/Facility ID #:COCompliance Monitoring?
[ 1 Yes [ 1 No
o>O(D O
Collected By (print): L Morrill +Purchase Order #:
Quote #:
DWPWSID#:
DW Location Code:
Q.(3»CNo
Cl Strips:
Sample pH Acceptable
pH Strips:
Sulfide Present
Lead Acetate Strips:
<I
otoCollected By (signature):-QTurnaround Date Required:Immediately Packed on Ice:
[ ]Yes [ ]No
IP to XD.eo T3Vi
Sample Disposal:
( ] Dispose as appropriate
( 1 Return
[ (Archive:
[ IHold:
re
Rush: (Expedite Charges Apply)
[ ] Same Day ( ] Next Day
[ ]2 Day ( 13 Day
[ ]4 Day [ ]5 Day
cField Filtered (If applicable):
( ]Yes I ]N0
0}tp o3to
CM OOo
CMc LL.(0Q.-I-o Y N NADCtpAnalysis:o sT
S O OTPCra Y N N Ao* M a tri x C o d e s (Ins ert In M a trix b ox b e lo w): D ri nkin g W a t er (D W ), G round W a t e r (G W), W a st e w a t er (W W ),
Prod uc t (P), S o ll/S o lld (S L), O il (O L), W ip e (W P), A ir (A R ), T is s u e (T S), B io a ss a y (B), V a p or (V ), O t h er (O T)
N WCLc01mtoO L A B U S E O N L Y :
L a b S a m pl e II / C o mm e nts:C o m p/C oll e ct e d (or
C om p o sit e S t a rt)
R e s f/o f O<uo>O (0Composite E ndCustomer S a m ple I D c C DMatrix *G r a b C QEClCtns t oreE<QcDateTimeDateTime(0<ou Z
R M-1 4 gr a bGW 2 ’^)P 2 X
p 1 X
p 1 X X
R M-1 8 gr a bGW P 2 X
P 1 X
P 1 X X
R M-1 9 gr a bGW P 2 X£2 .
P 1 X
P 1 X X
C u sto m er R e m arks / S p e cia l C on diti o ns / P o s si b l e H a z ard s: p yp g o f ic e U s e d:W e t B lu e Dry N on e L A B S a mpl e T e mp e r a ture Info :
T e mp B l a n k R e c e i v e d: Y N N A
T h erm I D #:
C o ol e r 1 T e m p U p o n R e c e ip t: o C
C o ol e r 1 T h e rm C orr. F a ctor: o C
C o ol e r 1 C orr e ct e d T e mp:
C o m m e nts:
o c
S H O R T H O L D S P R E S E N T (<7 2 hours): Y N N /A
P a ckin g M a t e ri a l U s e d:L a b T r a c ki ng #:
S a mpl e s r e c e iv e d vi a :
F E D E X U P S C li e nt C o uri e r P a c e C o uri e rRadchem s a m pl e (s) s cre e n e d (<500 c pm): Y N N A
R e lin quis h e d b y/C om p a ny : (S i gn a tur e )- ^
R e linq u i sh e d b y/C o mp a ny: (S ig n a t ure )
R e linq u i sh e d b y/C o m pIa n y: (S ign a tur e )
D a t e A im e :R e c e iv e d by/C o mp a nyi (S i g n or e ),i / z o /A i D a t e /T im e :M T JL L A B U S E O N L Y
T a bl e #:
D a t e /T i m e :R e c e iv e d b y/C o mp a ny: (S ign a tur e ) _
D a t e /T i m e : (R e c e i v e d b y/C o mp a ny: (S ign a tur e )
D a t e A im e :A cct n u m:
T e m p l a t e :
P r e log in:
P M:
Trip B l a nk R e c e i v e d: Y N N A
H C L M e O H T S P O t h e ry/l i/i y //j'^
N o n C onform a nc e (s): P a g e: ^
Y E S / N O o f: ^
D a t e /T im e :
P B :
LAB USE ONLY- Affix Workorder/Login Label Here or List Pace Workorder Number or
MTJL Log-in Number HereCHAIN-OF-CUSTODY Analytical Request Document
eAnalytical Submitting a sample via this chain of custody constitutes acknowledgment and acceptance of the Pace Terms and
Conditions found at: https://info,pacelabs.com/hubfs/pas-standard-terms.pdf
Chain-of-Custody is a LEGAL DOCUMENT ~ Complete all relevant fields
ALL BOLD OUTLINED AREAS are for LAB USE ONLYBilling Information: on fileCompany: Anfield Resources
Address:iLab Project Manager:Container Preservative Type
2 1 1 U
Email To: WrightEnv@gmai|.comReport To: Toby Wright; 227 Jefferson St; Ft. Collins, Co
80524 Preservative Types: (1) nitric acid, (2) sulfuric acid, (3) hydrochloric add, (4) sodium hydroxide, (5) line acetate,
(6) methanol, (7) sodium bisulfate, (8) sodium thiosulfate, (9) hexane, (A) ascorbic acid, (B) ammonium sulfate,
(C) ammonium hydroxide, (D)TSP, (U) Unpreserved, (0) Other
**
Site Collection Info/Address: Shootaring Canyon Mill, UtahCopy To: [e-mail] [e-mail]
[e-mail] Lab Profile/Llne:Analyses
State:Ut County/City: Garfield/ Ticaboo Time Zone
Collected:Mountain Standard
Customer Project Name/Number: Shootaring Canyon Mill Lab Sample Receipt Checklist:
Custody Seals Present/Intact Y N NR
Custody Signatures Present
Collector Signature Present V K NR
y N NR
y N NR
y N NR
Y N NR
y N NR
Y N NR
Y N NR
Y N NR
Y N NR
Bottles Intact
Correct Bottles
Sufficient Volume
Samples Received on Ice
VOR - Headspace Rcceptable
USDR Regulated Soils
Samples in Holding Time
Residual Chlorine Present
O
CO3Compliance Monitoring?
I ] Yes I INo
Site/Facillty ID #:Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
O)OCDO
Cl Strips;
Sample pH Rcceptable
pH Strips;
Sulfide Present
Lead Acetate Strips:
SIQ -F.o>Collected By (print): L Morrill Purchase Order It:
Quote #:
DW PWS ID #:
DW Location Code:
(MoI<o%9
S3
Immediately Packed on Ice:
1 lYes [ ]No
XCollected By (signature):Turnaround Date Required:O.ID
o obe:l/tCO cField F ilt e re d (if a p p lic a b l e ):
[ ]Y e s I ]N o
R u s h: (E x p e dit e C h arg e s A p ply)
( ] S a m e D a y [ ] N e xt D a y
[ 1 2 D a y [ ]3 D a y
( ]4 D a y [ ]5 D a y
S a m ple D is p os a l:
[ ] D is pos e a s a ppropri a t e
[ )R e turn
[ ) A rchi v e ;
( I H o ld:
ID Oto3oOoca.y N N R+o Q C9>IUAnalysis:so y N N RreONCOQ.* M a tri x C o d e s (Ins ert in M a tri x b o x b e low): D ri nkin g W a t er (D W), G ro u nd W a t er (G W), W a st e w a t er (W W ),
Prod uc t (P ), S oil/S olid (S L), O il (O L), W ip e (W P ), A ir (A R), T is s u e (T S ), B lo a ss a y (B), V a p or (V), O th er (O T )
cI Q ><C D it :(D o L A B U S E O N L Y ;
L a b S a m pl e # / C o mm e n t s:C O#ofComp/C oll e ct e d (or
C om p o sit e S t a rt)
R e s C Oo0)C om p o sit e E n d c C DEMatrix *C l C tn sCustomer S a m pl e ID G r a b C OEQCDTimeDateTimeDateouZ<I-
— C 3 0^p Xgrab2RM-2 0 G W
P X1
XP X1
0 /0grabPXRM-1 0 0 2GW
P 1 X
XP1 X
S e e W a d e f o r L a g g i n g
M S /M S D 9 ;g >2 p 3 XgrabGW
P X1
P X Xthis s a m p l e 1
i n .
L A B S a m p l e T e m p er a tur e Info :
T e mp B l a n k R e c e iv e d: Y
T h e rm I D #:
C o o l e r 1 T e m p U pon R e c e ip t: o C
N N R
C o o l e r 1 T h e rm C orr. F a c tor;
C o o l e r 1 C orr e c t e d T e mp;
C om m e nts:
S H O R T H O L D S P R E S E N T (<7 2 ho urs): Y N N /ACustomer R e m a rks / S p e ci a l C on ditio ns / P oss ibl e H a z ard s:T y p e of Ic e U s e d:W e t B l u e D ry N o n e
L a b T r a c kin g #:P a ckin g M a t e ri a l U s e d:
o C
S a m ple s r e c e i v e d vi a;
F E D E X U P S C li e nt C o uri e r P a c e C o uri e r
o CRadchem s a m pl e (s) scr e e n e d (<500 c p m): Y N N A
M T J L L A B U S E O N L YReceived b y/C o mp a ny: (S i g n a ture )
S /L C A Ii U /*J f
R e c e iv e d b y/C om p a ny : (S ign a tor e )
D a tRelinquished b y/C o m p a ti^ (S ign a tur e ) a
R dln q uis h e d b y/C o m p a n y; (S ig n a t ur e )
D a t e /T im e ;Im e:
T a bl e #:T f 5 2 ^
T rip B l a nk R e c e iv e d: Y N N A
H C L M e O H T S P O th e r
D a t e/ri m e :A c e t n um:
F e m p l a t e :
P r e log in:
P M:
D a t e A i m e :
D a t e /T im e :
y //?/^^ I i s r
N on C o n form a nc e (s):
Y E S / N O
P a g e :D a t e /T im e :R e c e iv e d b y/C o mp a ny; (S ign a tur e )R e lin q ui^e d b y/C cfm p a ny; (S ign a tur e )wof:
DC#_Title: ENV-FRM-SHRT-0033 v02_Condition Upon Receipt Form Terra Lab
Effective Date: 4/24/2023
Survey Meter # Model 2241-2; SN 182119
pH strip lot # HC312501
Thermometer SN# 27130475
Condition Upon Receipt (Attach to COO
Sample Receipt
1 Number of ice chests/packages received;
Note as "OTC" if samples are received over the counter, unpackaged
2 Temperature of cooler/samples, (if more than 8 coolers, obtain an additional CUR form.)
Temps Observed (°C):|
Temps Corrected (°C):
Acceptable is: 0.1° to 10°C for Bacteria: and 0.1° to 6°C for most other water parameters. Samples may not have had adequate time to cool
following collection. Indicate ROI (Received on Ice) for iced samples received on the same day as sampled, in addition to temperature at receipt.
7 ROI?No6!
7.0n3 4 >7
Client contact for temperatures outside method criteria must be documented below.
3 Emission rate of samples for radiochemical analyses < O.SmR/hr?
4 COC Number (If applicable):
5 Do the number of bottles agree with the COC?
6 Were the samples received intact? (no broken bottles, leaks, etc.)
1 Were the sampie custody seals intact?
8 Is the COC properly completed, legible, and signed?
Sample .VerificatiQn,.J.abeUnfl & Distribution
1 Were all requested analyses understood and appropriate?
2 Did the bottle labels correspond with the COC information?
3 Samples collected in method-prescribed containers?
4 Sample Preservation:
pH at Receipt:
No N/A
-lAlM
No N/A
N/A
No
No
No
No
No
Final pH (if added in lab):Preservative/Lot#Date/Ti
f //J- c7f
I-aVycy-
P‘1/
Total Metals
Diss Metals
HNO3
me Added:
Total Metals
( DIss Metals Filtered and preserved in metals
H2SO4
NaOH
Filtered and preserved in metals
Nutrient _
Cyanide _
Sulfide _
Phenol _
SDWA Rads
5 VOA vials have <6mm headspace?
6 Were ail analyses within holding time at the time of receipt?
7 Have rush or project due dates been checked and accepted?
8 Do samples require subcontracted analyses?
If "Yes", which type of subcontracting is required?
Sample Receipt, Verification, Login, Labeling & Distribution completed by (initials)-.
Nutrient
Cyanide
Sulfide
Phenol
ZnAcet
H2SO4
HNO3.SDWA Rads
Yes
Yes
Yes
General Custo
<2s>No
No
No
mer-Specified Certified
Df
Set ID:
Discrepancy Documentation (use back of sheet for notes on discrepancies)
Any items listed above with a response of "No" or do not meet specifications must be resolved.
Person Contacted:Method of Contact: Phone:
Initiated By^
Problem:
Date/Time:Email:
Resolution:
Qualtrax ID: 70962 Pace® Analytical Services, LLC Page 1 of 1
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
6DPSOHV5050505050505050550DQG50ZHUHUHFHLYHGRQ-XO\
$OOVDPSOHVZHUHUHFHLYHGDQGDQDO\]HGZLWKLQUHFRPPHQGHGKROGLQJWLPHVH[FHSWWKRVHQRWHGEHORZLQWKLVFDVHQDUUDWLYH
6DPSOHVZHUHDQDO\]HGXVLQJPHWKRGVRXWOLQHGLQWKHIROORZLQJUHIHUHQFHV
6WDQGDUG0HWKRGVIRUWKH([DPLQDWLRQRI:DWHUDQG:DVWHZDWHUDSSURYHGPHWKRGYHUVLRQV
(3$7HVW0HWKRGVIRU(YDOXDWLQJ6ROLG:DVWH3K\VLFDO&KHPLFDO0HWKRGV6:RQOLQHYHUVLRQV
(3$PHWKRGV&)53DUWVDQG(3$PHWKRGV
1'(30LQLQJ0HWKRGV
&)53DUW$SSHQGLFHV%-/2DQG)(0(4/
,2&RPSHQGLXP0HWKRGV
&OHDQ:DWHU$FW0HWKRGV8SGDWH5XOHIRUWKH$QDO\VLVRI(IIOXHQWFXUUHQWYHUVLRQ
$670DSSURYHGDQGUHFRJQL]HGVWDQGDUGV
,62DSSURYHGDQGUHFRJQL]HGVWDQGDUGV
86'$+DQGERRN
6RLO6XUYH\/DERUDWRU\0DQXDO9HU
$6$666$0HWKRGVRI$QDO\VLV3DUW
$6$666$0HWKRGVRI$QDO\VLV%RRN3DUW
2WKHULQGXVWU\DSSURYHGPHWKRGV

$OO4XDOLW\&RQWUROSDUDPHWHUVPHWWKHDFFHSWDQFHFULWHULDGHILQHGE\(3$DQG3DFH$QDO\WLFDOH[FHSWDVLQGLFDWHGLQWKLV
FDVHQDUUDWLYH
4XDOLILHUVE\VDPSOH
V1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV11LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV16SLNH5HFRYHU\RXWVLGHDFFHSWHGUHFRYHU\
OLPLWV
V1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV11LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV16SLNH5HFRYHU\RXWVLGHDFFHSWHGUHFRYHU\
OLPLWV
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6HUYLFHV,Q
/DE2UGHU6
&$6(1$55$7,9(
5HSRUW,'6
:DGH1LHXZVPD/DERUDWRU\2SHUDWLRQV0DQDJHU
(QWLUH5HSRUW5HYLHZHGE\
3DJHRI
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
'HILQLWLRQV
5/ 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW
4XDOLILHUV

9DOXHH[FHHGV0D[LPXP&RQWDPLQDQW/HYHO
$&KHFN06$VSHFLILFDWLRQV
%$QDO\WHGHWHFWHGLQWKHDVVRFLDWHG0HWKRG%ODQN
&&DOFXODWHG9DOXH
'5HSRUWOLPLWUDLVHGGXHWRGLOXWLRQ
(9DOXHDERYHTXDQWLWDWLRQUDQJH
*$QDO\]HGDW3DFH*LOOHWWH:<ODERUDWRU\
++ROGLQJWLPHVIRUSUHSDUDWLRQRUDQDO\VLVH[FHHGHG
-$QDO\WHGHWHFWHGEHORZTXDQWLWDWLRQOLPLWV
/$QDO\]HGE\DQRWKHUODERUDWRU\
09DOXHH[FHHGV0RQWKO\$YHRU0&/RULVOHVVWKDQ/&/
16DPSOHDQDO\]HGRXWVLGHRIFRPSOLDQFHUHTXLUHPHQWV
1' 1RW'HWHFWHGDWWKH5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW
22XWVLGHWKH5DQJHRI'LOXWLRQV
36DPSOHSUHVHUYHGLQODEDWWLPHRIUHFHLSW
553'RXWVLGHDFFHSWHGUHFRYHU\OLPLWV
66SLNH5HFRYHU\RXWVLGHDFFHSWHGUHFRYHU\OLPLWV
8$QDO\WHEHORZPHWKRGGHWHFWLRQOLPLW
;0DWUL[(IIHFW
3DJHRI
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
&KORULGH  PJ/(3$$%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& $%
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ $0%
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1  PJ/ (3$ $0%
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% .$7
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 -06
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/(3$-*8
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'505
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
&KORULGH  PJ/ (3$ $%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& $%
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ $0%
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ $0%
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% .$7
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 -06
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/(3$-*8
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'505
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
&KORULGH  PJ/(3$$%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& $%
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ $0%
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ $0%
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% .$7
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 -06
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/(3$-*8
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% $%
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% $%
&KORULGH  PJ/ (3$ $%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& $%
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ $0%
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ $0%
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% .$7
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 -06
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF  PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/(3$-*8
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP 1' S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“ 1$ S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH30
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
&KORULGH  PJ/ (3$ $%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& $%
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ $0%
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ $0%
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% .$7
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 -06
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/(3$-*8
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH30
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP 1' S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“ 1$ S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
&KORULGH  PJ/(3$$%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& $%
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ $0%
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ $0%
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% .$7
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 -06
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/(3$-*8
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
&KORULGH  PJ/(3$$%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& $%
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ $0%
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ $0%
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% .$7
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 -06
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/(3$-*8
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP 1' S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“ 1$ S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
&KORULGH  PJ/(3$$%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& $%
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ $0%
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ $0%
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% .$7
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 -06
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/(3$-*8
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
&KORULGH  PJ/ (3$ $%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& $%
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ $0%
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ $0%
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% .$7
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 -06
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF  PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/(3$-*8
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP 1' S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“ 1$ S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP 1' S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“ 1$ S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% .$7
&KORULGH  PJ/(3$$%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& $%
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ $0%
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ $0%
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% .$7
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 -06
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/(3$-*8
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$ONDOLQLW\6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R%/$1.
$ONDOLQLW\7RWDO$V&D&2 1'
$ONDOLQLW\6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R$74&
$ONDOLQLW\7RWDO$V&D&2
$ONDOLQLW\6DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWV PJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$'
 $ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2 
 $ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2 
 $ONDOLQLW\7RWDO$V&D&2 
&RQGXFWLYLW\E\60%6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWV —PKRVFP
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R %/$1.
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\ 1'
&RQGXFWLYLW\E\60%6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWV—PKRVFP
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R$74&
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\
&RQGXFWLYLW\E\60%6DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWV—PKRVFP
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$'
 (OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\ 
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
'LVVROYHG0HUFXU\E\(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R0%
0HUFXU\ 1'
'LVVROYHG0HUFXU\E\(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R/&6
0HUFXU\
'LVVROYHG0HUFXU\E\(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWV PJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6
 1'0HUFXU\
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6
 1'0HUFXU\
'LVVROYHG0HUFXU\E\(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6'
 0HUFXU\
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6'
 0HUFXU\
'LVVROYHG0HUFXU\E\(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6''
1' 0HUFXU\ 1'
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R 6''
1' 0HUFXU\ 1'
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&3(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R0%/.',66&$7
=LQF 1'
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&3(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R',66/&6
=LQF 
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&3(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWV PJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6
 1'=LQF 
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6
 1'=LQF 
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&3(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6'
 =LQF 
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6'
 =LQF 
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&3(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6''
1' =LQF 1'
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R 6''
1' =LQF 1'
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&306(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R0%/.
$UVHQLF 1'
%DULXP 1'
&DGPLXP 1'
&KURPLXP 1'
&RSSHU 1'
/HDG 1'
0RO\EGHQXP 1'
6HOHQLXP 1'
6LOYHU 1'
8UDQLXP 1'
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&306(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R/&6
$UVHQLF 
%DULXP 1'
&DGPLXP 
&KURPLXP 
&RSSHU 
/HDG 
0RO\EGHQXP 
6HOHQLXP 
6LOYHU 
8UDQLXP 
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&306(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6
 1'$UVHQLF 
 %DULXP 
 1'&DGPLXP 
 1'&KURPLXP 
 1'&RSSHU 
 1'/HDG 
 1'0RO\EGHQXP 
 1'6HOHQLXP 
 1'6LOYHU 
 8UDQLXP 
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&306(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'06'
 $UVHQLF 
 %DULXP 
 &DGPLXP 
 &KURPLXP 
 &RSSHU 
 /HDG 
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&306(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'06'
 0RO\EGHQXP 
 6HOHQLXP 
 6LOYHU 
 8UDQLXP 
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&306(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6''
1' $UVHQLF 1'
 %DULXP 
1' &DGPLXP 1'
1' &KURPLXP 1'
1' &RSSHU 1'
1' /HDG 1'
1' 0RO\EGHQXP 1'
1' 6HOHQLXP 1'
1' 6LOYHU 1'
 8UDQLXP 
)OXRULGHE\606DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R%/$1.
)OXRULGH 1'
)OXRULGHE\606DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R$74&
)OXRULGH 
)OXRULGHE\606DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWV PJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$63.06
 )OXRULGH 
)OXRULGHE\606DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$63.06'
 )OXRULGH 
)OXRULGHE\606DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$'
 )OXRULGH 
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R 6$'
 )OXRULGH 
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
*URVV$OSKD%HWDE\60%6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVS&L/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R0%/.
*URVV$OSKD'LVVROYHG 1'
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R0%/.
*URVV$OSKD'LVVROYHG 1'
*URVV$OSKD%HWDE\60%6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVS&L/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R /&6$
*URVV$OSKD'LVVROYHG
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R/&6$
*URVV$OSKD'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD%HWDE\60%6DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWV S&L/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6(06$
 *URVV$OSKD'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD%HWDE\60%6DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVS&L/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6(06'$
 *URVV$OSKD'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD%HWDE\60%6DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWVS&L/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6''83
 *URVV$OSKD'LVVROYHG 
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQVE\,21&KURPDWRJUDSK\6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R%/.
&KORULGH 1'
6XOIDWH 1'
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R%/.
&KORULGH 1'
6XOIDWH 1'
$QLRQVE\,21&KURPDWRJUDSK\6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R/&6
&KORULGH 
6XOIDWH 
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R /&6
&KORULGH 
6XOIDWH 
$QLRQVE\,21&KURPDWRJUDSK\6DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$63.
 &KORULGH 
 6XOIDWH 
$QLRQVE\,21&KURPDWRJUDSK\6DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$63.'
 &KORULGH 
 6XOIDWH 
$QLRQVE\,21&KURPDWRJUDSK\6DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$'
 &KORULGH 
 6XOIDWH 
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
&DWLRQVE\,&30HWKRG6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R0%/.',66&$7
&DOFLXP 1'
0DJQHVLXP 1'
3RWDVVLXP 1'
6RGLXP 1'
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R0%/.',66&$7
&DOFLXP 1'
0DJQHVLXP 1'
3RWDVVLXP 1'
6RGLXP 1'
&DWLRQVE\,&30HWKRG6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R',66/&6
&DOFLXP 
0DJQHVLXP 
3RWDVVLXP 
6RGLXP 
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R',66/&6
&DOFLXP 
0DJQHVLXP 
3RWDVVLXP 
6RGLXP 
&DWLRQVE\,&30HWKRG6DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$6
 &DOFLXP 
 0DJQHVLXP 
 3RWDVVLXP 
 6RGLXP 
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$6
 &DOFLXP 
 0DJQHVLXP 
 3RWDVVLXP 
 6RGLXP 
&DWLRQVE\,&30HWKRG6DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R 6$6'
 &DOFLXP 
 0DJQHVLXP 
 3RWDVVLXP 
 6RGLXP 
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
&DWLRQVE\,&30HWKRG6DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$6'
 &DOFLXP 
 0DJQHVLXP 
 3RWDVVLXP 
 6RGLXP 
&DWLRQVE\,&30HWKRG6DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$'
 &DOFLXP 
 0DJQHVLXP 
 3RWDVVLXP 
 6RGLXP 
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$'
 &DOFLXP 
 0DJQHVLXP 
 3RWDVVLXP 
 6RGLXP 
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$'
 &DOFLXP 
 0DJQHVLXP 
 3RWDVVLXP 
 6RGLXP 
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLDDV16DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R:&%
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLDDV1 1'
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLDDV16DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R,&9
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLDDV1
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLDDV16DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6%
 1LWURJHQ$PPRQLDDV1
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLDDV16DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R 6%
 1LWURJHQ$PPRQLDDV1
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV16DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R0%/.
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1 1'
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV16DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R,&9
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV16DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWV PJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6&
  61LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV16DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6&
  61LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1
5DGLXPLQ:DWHU'LVVROYHG 6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVS&L/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R3UHS'DWH%DWFK,'0%
5DGLXP'LVVROYHG 1'
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R  3UHS'DWH  %DWFK,' 0%
5DGLXP'LVVROYHG 1'
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R3UHS'DWH%DWFK,'0%
5DGLXP'LVVROYHG 1'
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R  3UHS'DWH  %DWFK,' 0%
5DGLXP'LVVROYHG 1'
5DGLXPLQ:DWHU'LVVROYHG 6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVS&L/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R3UHS'DWH%DWFK,'/&6
5DGLXP'LVVROYHG
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R3UHS'DWH%DWFK,'/&6
5DGLXP'LVVROYHG
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R3UHS'DWH%DWFK,'/&6
5DGLXP'LVVROYHG
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R3UHS'DWH%DWFK,'/&6
5DGLXP'LVVROYHG
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLXPLQ:DWHU'LVVROYHG 6DPSOH7\SH /&6'8QLWVS&L/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R3UHS'DWH%DWFK,'/&6'
 5DGLXP'LVVROYHG
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R3UHS'DWH%DWFK,'/&6'
 5DGLXP'LVVROYHG
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R3UHS'DWH%DWFK,'/&6'
 5DGLXP'LVVROYHG
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R3UHS'DWH%DWFK,'/&6'
 5DGLXP'LVVROYHG
5DGLXPLQ:DWHU'LVVROYHG 6DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWVS&L/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R  3UHS'DWH  %DWFK,' 6(06
 5DGLXP'LVVROYHG
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R3UHS'DWH%DWFK,'6(06
 5DGLXP'LVVROYHG
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R3UHS'DWH%DWFK,'6(06
 5DGLXP'LVVROYHG
5DGLXPLQ:DWHU'LVVROYHG 6DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVS&L/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R3UHS'DWH%DWFK,'6(06'
 5DGLXP'LVVROYHG
6LOLFDDV6L26DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R0%/.',66&$7
6LOLFDDV6L2 1'
6LOLFDDV6L26DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWV PJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R',66/&6
6LOLFDDV6L2
6LOLFDDV6L26DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6''
 6LOLFDDV6L2 
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6''
 6LOLFDDV6L2 
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
6ROLGV%\606DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R',
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV 1'
6ROLGV%\606DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R&21752/
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV
6ROLGV%\606DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWV PJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$
 7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV 
3DJHRI
Shootaring Canyon Mill
SHOOTARING CANYON MILL GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM
QAP FIELD SAMPLING CHECKLIST
Sample Collection Date: 7/14-15/2023
Reviewer\Date: April Lafferty 09/05/2023
RM-100
Field Sampling YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO
Meter function check OK & Recorded?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
Water level recorded to 0.01 feet?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
Well casing volume correctly calculated?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
Pumping rate determined and recorded?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
Field Parameter Stabilization
Minimum interval achieved?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
3 readings with pH ± 0.2 s.u.; Conductivity ± 10% ?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
Sufficient minimum well volume pumped?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
Sample bottles & preservatives correct and recorded?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
COMMENTS
RM-1 Blind Field Dup as RM100
RM-2R
RM-7
RM-8
RM-12 well was sampled when approximately one gallon is left to ensure a sample is collected before the water level reaches the pump
RM-14
RM-18
RM-19
RM-20
DUP Blind Field Dup of RM1
Tails
RM-1 RM-2R RM-7 RM-8 RM-20 Blind DupBlind DupRM-12 RM-14 RM-18 RM-19 Tails Sump
Shootaring Canyon Mill
SHOOTARING CANYON MILL GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM
QAP DATA COMPLETENESS & DATA PACKAGE QA/QC CHECKLIST
Sample Collection Date: 7/14-15/2023 Report Date\Work Order No.: S2307223
Reviewer\Date: April Lafferty 09/05/2023
Data Completeness YES NO YES NO
Lab certification still current?ü Is Lab QA\QC summary report present?ü
Is receipt temperature, between 0.1 and 6 degrees C?ü Do all samples sent have reported analyses (QAP Table 3)?ü
Chain of Custody complete and intact as per approved QAP?ü Were all analytes requested reported (QAP Table 3)?ü
Received w/ custody seals intact?ü Are all field forms present from field site?ü
RM-100
Data Package QA\QC YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO
Are all reporting limits ≤ QAP Table 3?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
Are all methods as per QAP Table 3?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
Are dates of all analysis within holding times?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
COMMENTS
RM-1
Blind Field Dup as RM100
RM-2R
RM-7
RM-8
RM-12
RM-14
RM-18
RM-19
RM-20
DUP
(RM-100); duplicate of RM1
Tails Sump
YES NO Notes
Are Method Blanks < Lab Reporting Limits? ü
Are Lab Control Sample (LCS) %Rec within range? ü
Are MS & MSD %Rec within range?ü Nitrate + Nitrite Spike recovery outside laboratory limits
Are MS\MSD RPD within range? ü
Are Blind Field Duplicate RPD's acceptable for all analytes?ü
RM-1 RM-2R RM-7 RM-8 RM-12 RM-14 RM-18 RM-19 RM-20 Tails Sump Blind Dup
Shootaring Canyon Mill
GROUNDWATER FIELD BLIND DUPLICATE ANALYSIS (Q3 2023)
Sample Collection Date: 7/14-15/2023
Reviewer\Date: April Lafferty 09/05/2023
Report Date\Work Order No.: S2307223
Primary
Sample
Duplicate
Sample
RM1 RM100
Analyte Units CRL
Primary
Sample
Duplicate
Sample
RPD
(%)
Major Ions Carbonate as CaCO3 mg/L 2 6 6 NA
Bicarbonate as CaCO3 mg/L 2 157 158 1%
Calcium (Ca)mg/L 1 23 22 4%
Chloride (Cl)mg/L 1 6 6 0%
Fluoride (F)mg/L 0.1 0.3 0.3 0%
Magnesium (Mg)mg/L 1 24 24 0%
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N mg/L 0.1 0.1 <0.1 NA
Nitrogen, Nitrite + Nitrate as N mg/L 0.1 1.4 1.3 7%
Potassium (K)mg/L 1 3 3 0%
Sodium (Na)mg/L 1 21 21 0%
Sulfate (SO4)mg/L 1 16 16 0%
Physical Properties TDS mg/L 20 230 210 9%
Metals -Total Recoverable Arsenic (As)mg/L 0.003 <0.003 <0.003 NA
Barium (Ba)mg/L 0.1 0.1 0.1 0%
Cadmium (Cd)mg/L 0.001 <0.001 <0.001 NA
Chromium (Cr)mg/L 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 NA
Copper (Cu)mg/L 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 NA
Lead (Pb)mg/L 0.002 <0.002 <0.002 NA
Mercury (Hg)mg/L 0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 NA
Molybdenum (Mo)mg/L 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 NA
Selenium (Se)mg/L 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 NA
Silver (Ag)mg/L 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 NA
Uranium (U)mg/L 0.0003 0.0035 0.0035 0%
Zinc (Zn)mg/L 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 NA
Radionuclides Gross Alpha pCi/L 10 8.5
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U pCi/L 5.30 5.30
precision (±)pCi/L 1.2 0.9 0.00
Gross Alpha MDC pCi/L 3 2.0 2.0 RER
Radium-226 (Ra-226)pCi/L 0.6 0.4
precision (±)pCi/L 0.1 0.1 1.41
Radium-226 MDC pCi/L 0.2 0.2 0.2 RER
NA = Not Applicable
ND = Non-Detection at Reporting Limit or MDC
MDC = Lab reported Minimum Detectable Quantity
RER = Replicate Error Ratio = absolute value (original value - dup value)/sqrt[(orig sample error)^2 +(dup error)^2), should be <2
RPD = Relative Percent Difference = absolute value of (primary- duplicate)/((primary+duplicate)/2) <15% if greater than 3 times the MDL
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY Analytical Request Document LAB USE ONLY- Affix Workorder/Login Label Here or List Pace Workorder Number or
MTJL Log-in Number HereceAnalyticalSubmitting a sample via this chain of custody constitutes acknowledgment and acceptance of the Pace Terms and
Conditions found at: https://lnfo.pacelabs.com/hubfs/pas-standard-terms.pdf
Chain-of-Custody Is a LEGAL DOCUMENT - Complete all relevant fields
Company: Anfleld Resources Billing Information: on file ALL BOLD OUTLINED AREAS are for LAB USE ONLY
Address:
Container Preservative Type iLab Project Manager:
Report To: Toby Wright; 227 Jefferson St; Ft. Collins, Co
80524
2 1 1 UEmaii To; [e-mail]
●● Preservative Types: (1) nitric add, (2) sulfuric add, (3) hydrochloric add, (4) sodium hydroxide, (5) zinc acetate,
(6) methanoi, (7) sodium bisulfate, (8) sodium thiosulfate, (9) hexane, (A) ascorbic acid, (B) ammonium suifate,
(C) ammonium hydroxide, (D) TSP, (U) Unpreserved, (0) Other
Copy To: [e-mail] [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Site Collection Info/Address: Shootaring Canyon Mill, Utah
Analyses Lab Proflle/Une;Customer Project Name/Number: Shootaring Canyon Mill State:Ut County/City; Garfield/Ticaboo Time2one
Collected:Mountaln Standard o Lab Sample Receipt Checklist:
Custody Seals Present/Intact Y N NA
Custody Signatures Present
Collector Signature Present Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Bottles Intact
Correct Bottles
Sufficient Volume
Samples Received on Ice
VOA - Headspace Acceptable
USDA Regulated Soils
Samples in Holding Time
Residual Chlorine Present
Phone: [phone]S
Email: [e-mail]
SIte/FacllltylD#:D COCompliance Monitoring?
[ ] Yes [ INo
O)O<0 O
Collected By (print): L Morrill -I-Purchase Order #:
Quote #:
DW PWS ID #:
DW Location Code:
Q.O)CMo
Cl Strips:
Sample pH Acceptable
pH Strips;
Sulfide Present
Lead Acetate Strips:
X <oCollected By (signature);43Turnaround Date Required:Immediately Packed on Ice:
[ ]Yes [ ]No
tp Xo.
0 T3roSample Disposal:
[ 1 Dispose as appropriate
( ) Return
[ I Archive:
IHold:
Rush: (Expedite Charges Apply)
[ ) Same Day [ ] Next Day
[ ]2 Day ( ]3 Day
[ ] 4 Day [ ]5 Day
cField Filtered (if applicable):
[ ]Yes [ ]No
tp o3CDCMoooCMC(DQ-F o Y N N Aa:<uAnalysis;U stsTJcro Y N N AoN M a trix C o d e s (Ins e rt In M a trix bo x b e lo w): D ri nkin g W a t er (D W), G round W a t e r (G W ), W a st e w a t er (W W ),
Prod uc t (P), S oil/S olid (S L), O il (O L), W ip e (W P ), A ir (A R ), T issu e (T S ), B io a ss a y (B ), V a por (V ), O t h er (O T )
<0.t;0 .c<u O )(Da.<(0 O>-t-L A B U S E O N L Y ;
L a b S a m pl e # / C o mm e n t s:C o m p/cCollected (or
C omposit e S t a rt)
#ofRes O0)(COJOComposite E n dCustomer S a m pl e ID c C OMatrix *C OGrabEClCtns C OreEQ<0DateTimeCODateTimeou<<
R M -1 G W gr a b P‘7 .V O 2 X
p 1 X 5XL
P X1
R M-2 R gr a bGW P 2 —X
P 1 X
P 1 X X
R M-7 G W gr a b P/ -5 ;2 X
P 1 X 1pX1X
C ust o m e r R e m a rks / S p e ci a l C o ndition s / P oss ibl e H a z a rd s;T y p e of Ic e U s e d:L A B S a mpl e T e m p e ra tur e Info :
T e mp B l a n k R e c e i v e d: Y N N A
T h e rm I D #:
C o ol er 1 T e mp U p on R e c e ip t: o C
C o ol e r 1 T h erm C orr. F a c tor: c C
C o ol e r 1 C orre c t e d T e mp:o C
C o mm e n t s: Q —p
W e t B lu e D ry N on e S H O R T H O L D S P R E S E N T (<7 2 h o urs) : Y N N/A
P a c ki n g M a t eri a l U s e d:L a b Tra cking #:
S a mpl e s r e c e iv e d vi a :
F E D E X U P S C li e nt C o uri e r P a c e C ouri e rRadchem s a m pl e (s) s cr e e n e d (<500 c pm):N N A
R e lin quis h e d b y/C om p a ny : (S ign a tur e )D a t e /T i m e :
D a t e A lm e :
R e cqhjg d b y/C o mp^n y : (S ign a tur e ) D a t e /T im e :
C omp a n y; (S t a t ur e ) D a t e A i m e :
JJLl
R k e i v e d
M T JL L A B U S E O N L Y
T a bl e #;
R e linq u i sh e d b y/C o m p a ny : (S ign a tur e )A cc tn u m:
T e mpl a t e :
P r e l o gin:
T ri p B l a n k R e c e iv e d: Y N N A
H C L M e O H T S P O th erA// (h 1 2 >Ii y
R e lin quis h e d ^/C o m p a n y: (S ign a tur e )D a t e A im e :R e c e iv e d b y/C o m p a ny : (S i g n a ture )D a t e A im e :P M:N on C o nf orm a n c e(s): P a g e :
Y E S / N O of:P B:
LAB USE ONLY- Affix Workorder/Login Label Here or List Pace Workorder Number or
MTJL Log-in Number Here
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY Analytical Request Document
ceAnalytical Submitting a sample via this chain of custody constitutes acknowledgment and acceptance of the Pace Terms and
Conditions found at: https://info.pacelabs.com/hubfs/pas-standard-terms.pdf
Chain-of-Custody Is a LEGAL DOCUMENT - Complete all relevant fields
Company: Anfield Resources Billing Information: on file ALL BOLD OUTLINED AREAS are for LAB USE ONLY
Address:
Container Preservative Type a*iLab Project Manager:
2 1 1 UReport To: Toby Wright; 227 Jefferson St; Ft. Collins, Co
80524
Email To: [e-mail]
* Pre s e rv ativ e T y p e s: (1) nitric a cid, (2) su lfuric a cid, (3) h ydroch loric a cid , (4) sodiu m hydroxid e , (5) z inc a c et a te ,
(6) m e th a nol, (7) so diu m b is ulf a te , (8) sodium th iosulf a t e , (9) h e x a n e , (A ) a s corbic a cid , (B) a mmo nium s ulf at e ,
(C) a mmo nium h y dro x id e , (D| T S P, (U ) U n pr e s erv e d, (0) O th er
C opy T o: l a mly a m orrill @ y a ho o .c om s a g arlin g @ rd e in c.c om
a pril @ twri g h t .c o m
S it e C oll e ction Inf o/A ddr e s s : S ho ot arin g C a ny on Mill, U t a h
A n a lys e s L a b Profll e /Lln e :C u sto m e r P roj e ct N a m e /N u mb e r: S h oot a rin g C a ny on Mill S t a t e :U t C o un ty/C ity : G arfi e l d/ T ic a boo T im e Z o n e
C oll e ct e d:M o un t a i n S t a n d a rd O L a b S a m pl e R e c e i p t C h e c k lis t:
C us t od y S e a ls P r e s e n t/In t a c t Y N N A
C u sto d y S i gn a t ur e s P r e s e nt
C oll e c t or S i g n a ture P r e s e nt Y N N A
Y N N A
Y N N A
Y N N A
Y N N A
Y N N A
Y N N A
Y N N A
Y N N A
Y N N A
B o ttl e s In t a ct
C orr e ct B ot tl e s
S u ffic i e n t V olum e
S a m p l e s R e c e iv e d o n Ic e
V O A - H e a d sp a c e A c c e p t a bl e
U S D A R e g u l a t e d S o il s
S a m p l e s in H ol din g T im e
R e sid u a l C h l ori n e P r e s e nt
P h o n e : 43 5-633-303 S
E m a il: l a m i y a morrill @ y a h oo .com
S it e /F a cility I D #:3 C OCompliance M o n itoring?
[ ] Y e s [ ] N o
O )OmO+C oll e ct e d B y (prin t): L Morrill P urch a s e O rd er #:
Q u ot e #:
C LDW P W S I D #:
D W Lo c a ti on C o d e :
O )C M
C l S tri p s:
S a mp l e p H A c c e p t a bl e
p H S trip s:
S u lfi d e P r e s e nt
L e a d A c e t a t e S tri p s:
<X ooCollected B y (sign a tur e ):T urn aro un d D a t e R e quir e d:Im m e di a t e ly P a c k e d o n Ic e:
[ l Y e s [ ]N o
S IQ.!!!ait:oSample D is po s a l:
I ] D is pos e a s a p pro pri a t e
[ 1 R e t urn
( 1 Arc hiv e :
I IH old:
CRush: (E x p e dit e C h arg e s A p ply)
[ ] S a m e D a y [ ] N e xt D a y
[ ]2 D a y [ 13 D a y
[ 1 4 D a y [ ] 5 D a y
F i e ld F ilt er e d (if a p p lic a b l e ):
[ l Y e s [ I N o
to o.-tt 3 to oo±ici II.(0a.Y N N AoccAnalysis:u 5<0 ao c Y N N AraN<0* M a tri x C od e s (Ins ert in M a tri x bo x b e low): Drin k i n g W a t er (D W), G ro u nd W a t e r (G W), W a s t e w a t er (W W ),
Pro du c t (P ), S o il/S o lid (S L),O il (O L), W ip e (W P), A ir (A R ), T issu e (T S), B io a ss a y (B), V a p or (V), O th er (O T )
o.Cs.o<(0 bti(0 O L A B U S E O N L Y :
L a b S a m pl e # / C o mm e n t s:CComp/C oll e ct e d (or
C omposit e S t a rt)
ORes#of (0OComposite E n d cCustomer S a m ple ID C OMatrix *EGrabClCtns WroE<Q01Cs<ADateTimeDateTime<2
R M-8 gr a bGW — O o VP2X
P 1 X
P 1 X X
R M-1 2 gr a bGW P 2 X
p 1 X
p X1 X
R M-1 2 A T -'S ^- o >XXIX
X X
C u sto m e r R e m a rks / S p e ci a l C on ditio ns / P o s si bl e H a z a rd s: fy p g o f Ic e U s e d:L A B S a m ple T e mp er a t ur e Info:
T e mp B l a n k R e c e i v e d: Y
T h e rm I D il:
C o ol er 1 T e mp U p on R e c e ip t: o C
N N A
C oo l e r 1 T h e rm C orr. F a c t or:
C o ol er 1 C orr e ct e d T e m p:
C o m m e nt s:
W e t B lu e D ry N on e S H O R T H O L D S P R E S E N T (<72 ho urs): Y N N/A
P a c ki n g M a t e ri a l U s e d:L a b Tr a c k i n g #:
o CSamples r e c e iv e d vi a :
F E D E X U P S C li e nt C ouri e r P a c e C o uri e r o CRadchem s a mpl e (s) s cr e e n e d (<5 0 0 c pm): Y N N A
lis h e d b y/C dm|t (S ig n a t ure )D a t e A iin e ;R e c e iv e d b y/C omp a n y:,j S lg n a tur e j
D a t e A im e :
Li
R e c e iv e d b y/C om p a ny : (S lg n a ^re )
t e /T Im e :
it e A l m e :
D a t M T JL L A B U S E O N L Y
F a bl e It:
R e lin quis h e d b y/C om p a ny : (S ig n a t ure )D a T rip B l a n k R e c eiv e d: Y N N A
H C L M e O H T S P O th e r
A c ctnum:
T e mpl a t e :
P r e log in:
n W 2-1 / &0 O
B e lli Is h e d b y/C omp a n y : (S ign a tur e )D a t e /fim e :R e c e iv e d b y/C om p a ny : (S i g n a ture )D a t e/T im e :N o n C o nf orm a n c e(s): P a g e:
Y E S / N O o f:
P M:
P B :
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY Analytical Request Document LAB USE ONLY- Affix Workorder/Login Label Here or List Pace Workorder Number or
MTJL Log-in Number HereeAnalyticalSubmitting a sample via this chain of custody constitutes acknowledgment and acceptance of the Pace Terms and
Conditions found at: https://info.pacelabs.com/hubfs/pas-standard-terms,pdf
Chaln-of-Custody Is a LEGAL DOCUMENT - Complete all relevant fields
Company: Anfleld Resources Billing Information: on file ALL BOLD OUTLINED AREAS are for LAB USE ONLYAddress:
Container Preservative Type
1 I U I I I
iLab Project Manager:
Report To: Toby Wright; 227 Jefferson St; Ft. Collins, Co
80524
Copy To: [e-mail] [e-mail]
[e-mail]
2 1Email To: [e-mail]
** Preservative Types; (1) nitric add, (2) sulfuric acid, (3) hydrochloric acid, (4) sodium hydroxide, (5) zinc acetate,
(6) methanol, (7) sodium bisulfate, (8) sodium thiosulfate, (9) hexane, (A) ascorbic acid, (B) ammonium sulfate,
(C) ammonium hydroxide, (D)TSP, (U) Unpreserved, (O) Other
Site Collection Info/Address: Shootaring Canyon Mill, Utah
Analyses Lab Proflle/Llne:Customer Project Name/Number: Shootaring Canyon Mill State:Ut County/City: Garfield/ Ticaboo Time Zone
Collected.-Mountain Standard O Lab Sample Receipt Checklist;
Custody Seals Present/Intact Y N NA
Custody Signatures Present
Collector Signature Present Y N NA
Bottles Intact
Correct Bottles
Sufficient Volume
Samples Received on Ice
VOA - Headspace Acceptable
USDA Regulated Soils
Samples in Holding Time
Residual Chlorine Present
Cl Strips;
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Y N NA
Sample pH Acceptable
pH Strips;
Y N NA
Sulfide Present
Lead Acetate Strips;
Y N NA
Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Site/Facility ID #:Compliance Monitoring?
I ] Yes [ ] No
COO)OroO-cCollected By (print): L Morrill -FPurchase Order#:
Quote #:
DW PWSID#:
DW Location Code:
Q.o>CNX<oowCollected By (signature):43Turnaround Date Required;Immediately Packed on Ice:
[ ]Yes
Field Filtered (If applicable):
[ lYes
[ ]No
[ INO
O)XIPo.2SCD T>ixiSample Disposal:
[ 1 Dispose as appropriate
{ 1 Return
[ 1 Archive:
MHold:
ns
Rush: (Expedite Charges Apply)
[ ] Same Day [ ) Next Day
[ )2 Day ( ]3 Day
[ ]4 Day [ ]5 Day
c(p O3COcooCMo
c U-a .+o<DAnalysis:u S2*>#o c(O
* M a tri x C od e s (In s e rt in M a tri x bo x b e low): D rin kin g W a t er (D W ), G ro u nd W a t er (G W ), W a st e w a t er (W W ),
Prod uc t (P), S o H /S olld (S L), O il (O L), W i p e (W P ), A ir (A R ), T issu e (T S), B io a ss a y (B ), V a por (V ), O t h er (O T )
O N C Oa.COJ 0 5 O )<(0 O L A B U S E O N L Y :
L a b S a m pl e # / C o m m e nts:C om p /C oll e ct e d (or
C om p o sit e S t a rt)
R e s #of
C tns
O0)01 OComposite E n dCustomer S a m pl e ID M a trix *c C OGrabCDECl C OeaoDatec5<0Timew<D a t e T im e
R M-1 4 G W gr a b P 2 X
p 1 X
p 1 X XRM-1 8 G W gr a b p 2 X
p h /7/;:r1X
p 1 X X 7RM-1 9 G W gr a b P 2 X
P 1 X
P 1 X X
C ust o m e r R e m a rks / S p e cia l C o nditio ns / P o s si b l e H a z a rd s;T yp e of Ic e U s e d:W e t B lu e Dry L A B S a m p l e T e mp e r a tur e Info :
T e m p B l a nk R e c e iv e d ; Y
T h e rm ID S :
C o o l e r 1 T e m p U p on R e c e i p t: o C
N N A
C o o l e r 1 T h e rm C orr. F a ctor;
C o o l e r 1 C orr e ct e d T e mp:C om m e nts:
N on e S H O R T H O L D S P R E S E N T (<7 2 ho urs): Y N N /A
P a c kin g M a t e ri a l U s e d:L a b Tra cking #:
o CSamples r e c e iv e d vi a :
F E D E X U P SRadchem s a m pl e (s) s cr e e n e d (k S O O c p m): Y N N A o cClient C o uri e r P a c e C o uri e r
R e lin^i s h e d b y/C omp a n y :ig n a t ure)D a t e/T im e ;R e c e iv e d b y/C o m p a ny : (S i g n a ture ) , y
R e c e iv e d by/C o «fl p a ny: (S ign a tur e )
D a t e /T i m e :M T J L L A B U S E O N L Y
U k 2 3 ,T a bl e #:
R e li n quis h e d b y/C omp a n y ; (S ign a tur e )
/st
R e lln^uis h^ b y/C omp a n y : (S i gn a tur e )
()
D a t e/T im e :D a t e /T T m e :A cc tn u m:
T e m p l a t e :
P r e l o gin;
P M;
T rip B l a nk R e c e iv e d: Y N N A
H C L M e O H T S P O th e r^ r/^C iLhy I P m
D a t e /T i m e : [R e c e iv e d b y/C o m p a ny : (S ign a tur e )
//
D a t e /T i m e :N on C o nform a nc e(s): P a g e:
Y E S / N O o f:P B :
LAB USE ONLY- Affix vi/orkorder/Login Label Here or List Pace Workorder Number or
IVITjL Log-In Number Here/9^ce
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY Analytical Request Document
Submitting a sample via this chain of custody constitutes acknowledgment and acceptance of the Pace Terms and
Conditions found at: https://lnfo.pacelabs.com/hubfs/pas*standard-terms.pdf
Chatn-of-Custody is a LEGAL DOCUMENT - Complete all relevant fields
Analyticar
ALL BOLD OUTLINED AREAS are for LAB USE ONLYBilling Information: on fileCompany: Anfleld Resources
Container Preservative TypeAddress:[Lab Project Manager:
2 1 I 1 U I I I I I p
Presen/atlve Types: (1) nitric add, (2) sulfuric acid, (3) hydrochloric acid, (4) sodium hydroxide^ (5) dnc acetate,
(6) methanol, (7) sodium blsulfate, (8) sodium thiosulfate, (9) hexane, (A) ascorbic add, (B) ammonium sulfate,
(C) ammonium hydroxide, (D) TSP, (U) Unpreserved, (0) Other
**Email To: [e-mail] To: Toby Wright; 227 Jefferson St; Ft. Collins, Co
80524
Site Collection Info/Address: Shootaring Canyon Mill, UtahCopy To: [e-mail] [e-mail]
[e-mail] pb Profite/Llne:AnalysesState:Ut County/City: Garfield/TIcaboo Time Zone
Collected:Mountaln Standard
Customer Project Name/Number: Shootaring Canyon Mill Lab Sample Receipt Cheokliat:
Custody Seals Present/Intact Y N t
Custody Signatures Present
Collector Signature Present Y N !
Y N 1
Y N 1
Y N 1
Y N 1
Y N 1
Y N 1
Y N 1
Y N 1
Y N !
Bottles Intact
Correct Bottles
Sufficient Volume
Samples Received on Ice
|VOA - Headspace Acceptable
O
Z)COCompliance Monitoring?
[ ] Yes [ ] No
Site/Fadllty ID #:Phone: 43S-633-3035
Email; [e-mail]
O)OroO4=
Q +.O)Purchase Order#:
Quote #:
DW PWS ID #:
DW Location Code:
Collected By (print): L Morrill CMo
iuSDA Regulated Soils
Isamples in Holding Time
|Residual Chlorine Present
Cl Strips:
Sample pH Acceptable
pH Strips:
Sulfide Present
Lead Acetate Strips:
X <
oxfM
u>Immediately Packed on Ice:
[ lYes [ ]No
Turnaround Date Required:XCollected By (signature):D.a P
0iS pJScField F ilt e re d (if a ppli c a bl e):
[ ]Y e s [ I N o
0.
%R ush ; (E x p e dit e C h a rg e s A p ply)
[ 1 S a m e D a y [ ] N e xt D a y
[ ]2 D a y [ ]3 D a y
[ ]4 D a y [ ]5 D a y
S a m ple D isp os a l:
[ ] Dispos e a s a p pro pri a t e
[ 1 R e t urn
[ 1 A rc hiv e :
[ I H old:
O p "OCDOoCNo04Cll50.fS Y N 1o
2
uAnalysis:srtsOo Y N 1rooNWa. M a tri x C od e s (Ins e rt In M a tri x bo x b e l o w): D rink i n g W a t er (D W), G ro u nd W a t er (G W ), W a s t e w a t er (W W ),
Prod uc t (P), S oil/S olid (S L), O il (O L), W i p e (W P ), A ir (A R ), T is s u e (T S), B io a ss a y (B ), V a p or (V ), O th er (O T )
cOJ Q )<(0O,2 L A B U S E O N L Y :
L a b S a m pl e # / C o m m e nts:C o#ofComp/C o ll e ct e d (or
C o mpo sit e S t a rt)
R e s 0)WmaicOComposite E n d C QEClCtnsMatrix G r a bCustomer S a m ple ID C OQJSroCsTimeDateTimeDateZ
— o/C pgrabP2RM-2 0 G W » Z .:Z 3
P 1 X
XP X1
gr a b P 2 X - o//R M-1 0 0 G W
P X1
P X X1
J(-5 U -M P XMS/M S D f t no l«)
S e e W a i J e f or L o g g i n g
gr a b 3GW
P 1 X
Xthis s a m p l e P X1
S H O R T H O L D S P R K E N T (<7 2 h o urs); Y N N /A L A B S a m ple T e m p e ra t ure Info:
T e mp B l a n k R e c e i v e d: Y N
T h erm
C o ol e r 1 T e m p U p on R e c e ip t:
C o ol e r 1 T h e rm C orr. F a c t or:
C o ol e r 1 C orr e ct e d T e mp:
C o m m e n t s:
C u st o m e r R e m a rk s / S p e ci a l C on ditio ns / P o s si b l e H a z ard s: T yp e of Ic e U s e d;W e t B lu e D ry N on e
L a b Tra c king #:P a ckin g M a t e ri a l U s e d;
S a m ple s r e c e iv e d vi a :
F E D E X U P S C li e nt C o uri e r P a c e C o uri e rRadchem s a m pl e (s) scr e e n e d (<500 c pm); Y N N A
;s:M T JL L A B U S E O N L YReceived b y/C o m p a ny ; (S l|ri a tur e )/ 4
R e c e iv e d by/C o n fip a n y; (S l g n a fdre ) ^
D a t e/T Im e ;R q h n ji ulsh e d b y/C a m p a ny ; (S i g n a ture )D a t e /T i m e :
//'j^ ^3 T a bl e #:
T rip B l a nk R e c e iv e d; Y N N A
H C L M e O H T S P O th e r
D a t e/T im e :A cc tn u m:
T e m p l a t e :
P re login;
R e linqui s h e d b y/C o mp a ny; (S i g n a ture )
R e linqui s h e d by/C omp a n y? (Slgn a t 6 i*e)
D a t e /T i m e :
/
D a t e /fim e :N on C o nform a nc e(s): P a g e :
Y E S / N O o f:
D a t e /T im e :P M:R e c e iv e d b y/C o m p a ny : (S ig n a t ure )
P B :
DC#_Title: ENV-FRM-SHRT-0033 v02_Condition Upon Receipt Form Terra Lab
Effective Date: 4/24/2023
Survey Meter # Model 12SA; SN 136491
pH strip lot # HCHC312502
Thermometer SN# 27130475
Condition Upon Receipt (Attach to COO
Sample Receipt
1 Number of ice chests/packages received:
Note as "OTC" if samples are received over the counter, unpackaged
2 Temperature of cooler/samples, (if more than 8 coolers, obtain an additional CUR form.)
Temps Observed (°C): Q.?
Temps Corrected (°C): Q '^
Acceptable is: 0.1° to 10°C for Bacteria; and 0.1° to 6°C for most other water parameters. Samples may not have had adequate time to cool
following collection. Indicate ROI (Received on Ice) for iced samples received on the same day as sampled, in addition to temperature at receipt.
7 ROI?No
n <JT
(.n or
Client contact for temperatures outside method criteria must be documented below.
3 Emission rate of samples for radiochemical analyses < 0.5mR/hr?
4 COC Number (If applicable):
5 Do the number of bottles agree with the COC?
6 Were the samples received intact? (no broken boWes, leaks, etc.)
7 Were the sample custody seals intact?
8 Is the COC properly completed, legible, and signed?
Sample Verification. Labeling & DistributiQii
1 Were all requested analyses understood and appropriate?
2 Did the bottle labels correspond with the COC information?
3 Samples collected in method-prescribed containers?
4 Sample Preservation:
pH at Receipt:
Total Metals
Final pH (if added in lab):
Total Metals
Preserva
No N/A
No N/A
N/ANo
(@>Yes No
No
(Tfej No
No
No
Diss Metals
tive/Lot#
HNO3
Filtered and preserved in metals
H2SO4
NaOH
Date/Time Added:
Filtered and preserved in metalsDiss Metals
Nutrient
Cyanide
Sulfide
Phenol
SDWA Rads
5 VOA vials have <6mm headspace?
6 Were all analyses within holding time at the time of receipt?
7 Have rush or project due dates been checked and accepted?
8 Do samples require subcontracted analyses?
If "Yes", which type of subcontracting is required?
Sample Receipt, Verification, Login, Labeling & Distribution completed by (initials)-.
Nutrient
Cyanide
Sulfide
Phenol
ZnAcet
H2SO4
HNO3.SDWA Rads
Yes
Yes
Yes
General Custo
No
No
No
mer-Specified Certified
7 flliifir'Set ID:
Discrepancy Documentation (use back of sheet for notes on discrepancies)
Any items listed above with a response of "No" or do not meet specifications must be resolved.
Method of Contact:Phone:Person Contacted:
Date/Time:Email:Initiated Byj_
Problem:
Resolution:
Qualtrax ID: 70962 Pace® Analytical Services, LLC Page 1 of 1
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
6DPSOHV505050505050505055050DQG6XPSZHUHUHFHLYHGRQ
1RYHPEHU
$OOVDPSOHVZHUHUHFHLYHGDQGDQDO\]HGZLWKLQUHFRPPHQGHGKROGLQJWLPHVH[FHSWWKRVHQRWHGEHORZLQWKLVFDVHQDUUDWLYH
6DPSOHVZHUHDQDO\]HGXVLQJPHWKRGVRXWOLQHGLQWKHIROORZLQJUHIHUHQFHV
6WDQGDUG0HWKRGVIRUWKH([DPLQDWLRQRI:DWHUDQG:DVWHZDWHUDSSURYHGPHWKRGYHUVLRQV
(3$7HVW0HWKRGVIRU(YDOXDWLQJ6ROLG:DVWH3K\VLFDO&KHPLFDO0HWKRGV6:RQOLQHYHUVLRQV
(3$PHWKRGV&)53DUWVDQG(3$PHWKRGV
1'(30LQLQJ0HWKRGV
&)53DUW$SSHQGLFHV%-/2DQG)(0(4/
,2&RPSHQGLXP0HWKRGV
&OHDQ:DWHU$FW0HWKRGV8SGDWH5XOHIRUWKH$QDO\VLVRI(IIOXHQWFXUUHQWYHUVLRQ
$670DSSURYHGDQGUHFRJQL]HGVWDQGDUGV
,62DSSURYHGDQGUHFRJQL]HGVWDQGDUGV
86'$+DQGERRN
6RLO6XUYH\/DERUDWRU\0DQXDO9HU
$6$666$0HWKRGVRI$QDO\VLV3DUW
$6$666$0HWKRGVRI$QDO\VLV%RRN3DUW
2WKHULQGXVWU\DSSURYHGPHWKRGV

$OO4XDOLW\&RQWUROSDUDPHWHUVPHWWKHDFFHSWDQFHFULWHULDGHILQHGE\(3$DQG3DFH$QDO\WLFDOH[FHSWDVLQGLFDWHGLQWKLV
FDVHQDUUDWLYH
4XDOLILHUVE\VDPSOH
6$QLRQV6XOIDWH5HSRUWOLPLWUDLVHGGXHWRGLOXWLRQ
6$QLRQV&KORULGH5HSRUWOLPLWUDLVHGGXHWRGLOXWLRQ
6$QLRQV6XOIDWH5HSRUWOLPLWUDLVHGGXHWRGLOXWLRQ
4XDOLILHUVE\VDPSOH
6$ONDOLQLW\$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&253'RXWVLGHDFFHSWHGUHFRYHU\OLPLWV
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6HUYLFHV,Q
/DE2UGHU6
&$6(1$55$7,9(
5HSRUW,'6
:DGH1LHXZVPD/DERUDWRU\2SHUDWLRQV0DQDJHU
(QWLUH5HSRUW5HYLHZHGE\
3DJHRI
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
'HILQLWLRQV
5/ 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW
4XDOLILHUV

9DOXHH[FHHGV0D[LPXP&RQWDPLQDQW/HYHO
$&KHFN06$VSHFLILFDWLRQV
%$QDO\WHGHWHFWHGLQWKHDVVRFLDWHG0HWKRG%ODQN
&&DOFXODWHG9DOXH
'5HSRUWOLPLWUDLVHGGXHWRGLOXWLRQ
(9DOXHDERYHTXDQWLWDWLRQUDQJH
*$QDO\]HGDW3DFH*LOOHWWH:<ODERUDWRU\
++ROGLQJWLPHVIRUSUHSDUDWLRQRUDQDO\VLVH[FHHGHG
-$QDO\WHGHWHFWHGEHORZTXDQWLWDWLRQOLPLWV
/$QDO\]HGE\DQRWKHUODERUDWRU\
09DOXHH[FHHGV0RQWKO\$YHRU0&/RULVOHVVWKDQ/&/
16DPSOHDQDO\]HGRXWVLGHRIFRPSOLDQFHUHTXLUHPHQWV
1' 1RW'HWHFWHGDWWKH5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW
22XWVLGHWKH5DQJHRI'LOXWLRQV
36DPSOHSUHVHUYHGLQODEDWWLPHRIUHFHLSW
553'RXWVLGHDFFHSWHGUHFRYHU\OLPLWV
66SLNH5HFRYHU\RXWVLGHDFFHSWHGUHFRYHU\OLPLWV
8$QDO\WHEHORZPHWKRGGHWHFWLRQOLPLW
;0DWUL[(IIHFW
3DJHRI
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG30
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% -06
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% -06
&KORULGH  PJ/(3$$%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& -06
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ -06
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ %6
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% -06
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 6.5
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/(3$-*8
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG30
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'505
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG30
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% -06
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% -06
&KORULGH  PJ/ (3$ $%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& -06
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ -06
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ %6
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% -06
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 6.5
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/(3$-*8
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'505
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG30
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH30
'DWH5HFHLYHG30
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% -06
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% -06
&KORULGH  PJ/(3$$%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& -06
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ -06
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ %6
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% -06
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 6.5
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/(3$-*8
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH30
'DWH5HFHLYHG30
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH30
'DWH5HFHLYHG30
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% -06
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% -06
&KORULGH  PJ/ (3$ $%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& -06
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ -06
6XOIDWH  'PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ %6
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% -06
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 6.5
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF  PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/(3$-*8
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH30
'DWH5HFHLYHG30
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG30
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% -06
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% -06
&KORULGH  PJ/ (3$ $%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& -06
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ -06
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ %6
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% -06
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 6.5
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/(3$-*8
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG30
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'6XPS
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH30
'DWH5HFHLYHG30
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% -06
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2 1' PJ/ 60% -06
&KORULGH  'PJ/ (3$ $%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& -06
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ -06
6XOIDWH  'PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/(3$'*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1  PJ/ (3$ %6
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% -06
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 6.5
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/(3$-*8
0RO\EGHQXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'6XPS
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH30
'DWH5HFHLYHG30
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP 1' S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“ 1$ S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG30
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% -06
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% -06
&KORULGH  PJ/(3$$%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& -06
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ -06
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ %6
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% -06
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 6.5
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/(3$-*8
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG30
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP 1' S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“ 1$ S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH30
'DWH5HFHLYHG30
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% -06
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% -06
&KORULGH  PJ/(3$$%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& -06
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ -06
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ %6
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% -06
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 6.5
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/(3$-*8
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH30
'DWH5HFHLYHG30
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH30
'DWH5HFHLYHG30
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% -06
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% -06
&KORULGH  PJ/(3$$%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& -06
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ -06
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ %6
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% -06
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 6.5
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/(3$-*8
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH30
'DWH5HFHLYHG30
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP 1' S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“ 1$ S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH30
'DWH5HFHLYHG30
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% -06
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% -06
&KORULGH  PJ/ (3$ $%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& -06
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ -06
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ %6
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% -06
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 6.5
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF  PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/(3$-*8
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH30
'DWH5HFHLYHG30
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP 1' S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“ 1$ S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP 1' S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“ 1$ S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG30
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQV&DWLRQV
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% -06
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2  PJ/ 60% -06
&KORULGH  PJ/(3$$%
)OXRULGH  PJ/ 60)& -06
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1  PJ/ (3$ -06
6XOIDWH  PJ/ (3$ $%
&DOFLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
0DJQHVLXP  PJ/(3$'*
3RWDVVLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
6RGLXP  PJ/ (3$ '*
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLD$V1 1' PJ/ (3$ %6
6LOLFDDV6L2 PJ/ (3$ '*
*HQHUDO3DUDPHWHUV
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\  —PKRVFP 60% -06
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV  PJ/ 60 6.5
'DWD4XDOLW\
&DWLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
$QLRQ6XP  PHT/ 60( :1
&DWLRQ$QLRQ%DODQFH“   60( :1
0HWDOV'LVVROYHG
$UVHQLF 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
%DULXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&DGPLXP 1' PJ/(3$06
&KURPLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
&RSSHU 1' PJ/(3$06
/HDG 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
0HUFXU\ 1' PJ/(3$-*8
0RO\EGHQXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6HOHQLXP 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
6LOYHU 1' PJ/ (3$ 06
8UDQLXP  PJ/ (3$ 06
=LQF 1' PJ/ (3$ '*
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'50
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH$0
'DWH5HFHLYHG30
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[:DWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 60% $()
*URVV$OSKD([FOXGLQJ5DGRQDQG8UDQLXP 1' S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
*URVV$OSKD3UHFLVLRQ“ 1$ S&L/ &DOFXODWLRQ :1
5DGLXP  S&L/ 605D% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L/ 605D% :1
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$ONDOLQLW\6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R%/$1.
$ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2 1'
$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2 1'
$ONDOLQLW\7RWDO$V&D&2 1'
$ONDOLQLW\6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R$74&
$ONDOLQLW\7RWDO$V&D&2
$ONDOLQLW\6DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$'
 $ONDOLQLW\%LFDUERQDWH$V&D&2 
  5$ONDOLQLW\&DUERQDWH$V&D&2 
 $ONDOLQLW\7RWDO$V&D&2 
&RQGXFWLYLW\E\60%6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWV—PKRVFP
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R%/$1.
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\ 1'
&RQGXFWLYLW\E\60%6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWV—PKRVFP
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R $74&
(OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\
&RQGXFWLYLW\E\60%6DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWV—PKRVFP
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$'
 (OHFWULFDO&RQGXFWLYLW\ 
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
'LVVROYHG0HUFXU\E\(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R0%
0HUFXU\ 1'
'LVVROYHG0HUFXU\E\(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R/&6
0HUFXU\
'LVVROYHG0HUFXU\E\(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWV PJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6
 1'0HUFXU\
'LVVROYHG0HUFXU\E\(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6'
 0HUFXU\
'LVVROYHG0HUFXU\E\(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6''
1' 0HUFXU\ 1'
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&3(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R0%/.',66&$7
=LQF 1'
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&3(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R',66/&6
=LQF 
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&3(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWV PJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6
 1'=LQF 
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6
 1'=LQF 
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6
 1'=LQF 
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&3(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6'
 =LQF 
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6'
 =LQF 
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R 6'6'
 =LQF 
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&3(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6''
1' =LQF 1'
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&306(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R0%/.
$UVHQLF 1'
%DULXP 1'
&DGPLXP 1'
&KURPLXP 1'
&RSSHU 1'
/HDG 1'
0RO\EGHQXP 1'
6HOHQLXP 1'
6LOYHU 1'
8UDQLXP 1'
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&306(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R/&6
$UVHQLF 
%DULXP 1'
&DGPLXP 
&KURPLXP 
&RSSHU 
/HDG 
0RO\EGHQXP 
6HOHQLXP 
6LOYHU 
8UDQLXP 
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&306(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'6
 1'$UVHQLF 
 1'%DULXP 
 1'&DGPLXP 
 1'&KURPLXP 
 1'&RSSHU 
 1'/HDG 
 1'0RO\EGHQXP 
 1'6HOHQLXP 
 1'6LOYHU 
 8UDQLXP 
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&306(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'06'
 $UVHQLF 
 %DULXP 
 &DGPLXP 
 &KURPLXP 
 &RSSHU 
 /HDG 
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&306(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6'06'
 0RO\EGHQXP 
 6HOHQLXP 
 6LOYHU 
 8UDQLXP 
'LVVROYHG0HWDOVE\,&306(3$:DWHU 6DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6''
1' $UVHQLF 1'
1' %DULXP 1'
1' &DGPLXP 1'
1' &KURPLXP 1'
1' &RSSHU 1'
1' /HDG 1'
1' 0RO\EGHQXP 1'
1' 6HOHQLXP 1'
1' 6LOYHU 1'
 8UDQLXP 
)OXRULGHE\606DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R%/$1.
)OXRULGH 1'
)OXRULGHE\606DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R$74&
)OXRULGH 
)OXRULGHE\606DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWV PJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$'
 )OXRULGH 
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
*URVV$OSKD%HWDE\60%6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVS&L/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R0%/.
*URVV$OSKD'LVVROYHG 1'
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R0%/.
*URVV$OSKD'LVVROYHG 1'
*URVV$OSKD%HWDE\60%6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVS&L/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R /&6$
*URVV$OSKD'LVVROYHG
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R/&6$
*URVV$OSKD'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD%HWDE\60%6DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWV S&L/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6(06$
 *URVV$OSKD'LVVROYHG
*URVV$OSKD%HWDE\60%6DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVS&L/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6(06'$
 *URVV$OSKD'LVVROYHG“
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
$QLRQVE\,21&KURPDWRJUDSK\6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R%/.
&KORULGH 1'
6XOIDWH 1'
$QLRQVE\,21&KURPDWRJUDSK\6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R/&6
&KORULGH 
6XOIDWH 
$QLRQVE\,21&KURPDWRJUDSK\6DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$63.
 &KORULGH 
 6XOIDWH 
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R 6$63.
 &KORULGH 
 6XOIDWH 
$QLRQVE\,21&KURPDWRJUDSK\6DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$63.'
 &KORULGH 
 6XOIDWH 
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$63.'
 &KORULGH 
 6XOIDWH 
$QLRQVE\,21&KURPDWRJUDSK\6DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$'
 &KORULGH 
 6XOIDWH 
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
&DWLRQVE\,&30HWKRG6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R0%/.',66&$7
&DOFLXP 1'
0DJQHVLXP 1'
3RWDVVLXP 1'
6RGLXP 1'
&DWLRQVE\,&30HWKRG6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R',66/&6
&DOFLXP 
0DJQHVLXP 
3RWDVVLXP 
6RGLXP 
&DWLRQVE\,&30HWKRG6DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R 6$6
 &DOFLXP 
 0DJQHVLXP 
 3RWDVVLXP 
 6RGLXP 
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R 6$6
 &DOFLXP 
 0DJQHVLXP 
 3RWDVVLXP 
 6RGLXP 
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$6
 &DOFLXP 
 0DJQHVLXP 
 3RWDVVLXP 
 6RGLXP 
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$6
 &DOFLXP 
 0DJQHVLXP 
 3RWDVVLXP 
 6RGLXP 
&DWLRQVE\,&30HWKRG6DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R 6$6'
 &DOFLXP 
 0DJQHVLXP 
 3RWDVVLXP 
 6RGLXP 
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
&DWLRQVE\,&30HWKRG6DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$6'
 &DOFLXP 
 0DJQHVLXP 
 3RWDVVLXP 
 6RGLXP 
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$6'
 &DOFLXP 
 0DJQHVLXP 
 3RWDVVLXP 
 6RGLXP 
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$6'
 &DOFLXP 
 0DJQHVLXP 
 3RWDVVLXP 
 6RGLXP 
&DWLRQVE\,&30HWKRG6DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$'
 &DOFLXP 
 0DJQHVLXP 
 3RWDVVLXP 
 6RGLXP 
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$'
 &DOFLXP 
 0DJQHVLXP 
 3RWDVVLXP 
 6RGLXP 
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLDDV16DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R:&%
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLDDV1 1'
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLDDV16DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R,&9
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLDDV1
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLDDV16DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWV PJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6&06
 1'1LWURJHQ$PPRQLDDV1
1LWURJHQ$PPRQLDDV16DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6&06B'83
1'1LWURJHQ$PPRQLDDV1
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV16DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R0%/.
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1 1'
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV16DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWV PJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R/&6
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV16DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6&
 1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1
1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV16DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6&
 1LWURJHQ1LWUDWH1LWULWHDV1
3DJHRI
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLRUQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLXPLQ:DWHU'LVVROYHG 6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVS&L/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R3UHS'DWH%DWFK,'0%
5DGLXP'LVVROYHG 1'
5DGLXPLQ:DWHU'LVVROYHG 6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVS&L/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R3UHS'DWH%DWFK,'/&6
5DGLXP'LVVROYHG
5DGLXPLQ:DWHU'LVVROYHG 6DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWV S&L/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R3UHS'DWH%DWFK,'6(06
 5DGLXP'LVVROYHG
5DGLXPLQ:DWHU'LVVROYHG 6DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVS&L/
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R3UHS'DWH%DWFK,'6(06'
 5DGLXP'LVVROYHG
6LOLFDDV6L26DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R0%/.',66&$7
6LOLFDDV6L2 1'
6LOLFDDV6L26DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWV PJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R',66/&6
6LOLFDDV6L2
6LOLFDDV6L26DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6''
 6LOLFDDV6L2 
6ROLGV%\606DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R',
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV 1'
6ROLGV%\606DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWV PJ/
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R&21752/
7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV
6ROLGV%\606DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWVPJ/
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$
 7RWDO'LVVROYHG6ROLGV 
3DJHRI
Shootaring Canyon Mill
SHOOTARING CANYON MILL GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM
QAP FIELD SAMPLING CHECKLIST
Sample Collection Date: 11/5/2023
Reviewer\Date: April Lafferty 11/21/2023 and 1/31/2024
RM-100
Field Sampling YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO
Meter function check OK & Recorded?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
Water level recorded to 0.01 feet?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
Well casing volume correctly calculated?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
Pumping rate determined and recorded?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
Field Parameter Stabilization
Minimum interval achieved?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
3 readings with pH ± 0.2 s.u.; Conductivity ± 10% ?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
Sufficient minimum well volume pumped?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
Sample bottles & preservatives correct and recorded?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
COMMENTS
RM-1
RM-2R
RM-7
RM-8
RM-12 well was sampled when approximately one gallon is left to ensure a sample is collected before the water level reaches the pump
RM-14
RM-18
RM-19 Blind Field Dup as RM100
RM-20
DUP Blind Field Dup of RM19
Tails Sump
Blind DupBlind DupRM-12 RM-14 RM-18 RM-19 Tails SumpRM-1 RM-2R RM-7 RM-8 RM-20
Shootaring Canyon Mill
SHOOTARING CANYON MILL GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM
QAP DATA COMPLETENESS & DATA PACKAGE QA/QC CHECKLIST
Sample Collection Date: 11/5/2023 Report Date\Work Order No.: S2311115
Reviewer\Date: April Lafferty 11/21/2023 and 1/31/2024
Data Completeness YES NO YES NO
Lab certification still current?ü Is Lab QA\QC summary report present?ü
Is receipt temperature, between 0.1 and 6 degrees C?ü Do all samples sent have reported analyses (QAP Table 3)?ü
Chain of Custody complete and intact as per approved QAP?ü Were all analytes requested reported (QAP Table 3)?ü
Received w/ custody seals intact?ü Are all field forms present from field site?ü
RM-100
Data Package QA\QC YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO
Are all reporting limits ≤ QAP Table 3?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
Are all methods as per QAP Table 3?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
Are dates of all analysis within holding times?ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
COMMENTS
RM-1
RM-2R
RM-7
RM-8
Sulfate reporting limit over Table 3, results above reporting limit
RM-12
RM-14
RM-18
RM-19
Duplicated as RM-100
RM-20
DUP
(RM-100); duplicate of RM19
Tails Sump
Sulfate ad chloride reporting limit over Table 3, results above reporting limit
YES NO Notes
Are Method Blanks < Lab Reporting Limits? ü
Are Lab Control Sample (LCS) %Rec within range? ü
Are MS & MSD %Rec within range?ü
Are MS\MSD RPD within range? ü
Are Blind Field Duplicate RPD's acceptable for all analytes?ü
RM-1 RM-2R RM-7 RM-8 RM-12 RM-14 RM-18 RM-19 RM-20 Tails Sump Blind Dup
Shootaring Canyon Mill
GROUNDWATER FIELD BLIND DUPLICATE ANALYSIS (Q4 2023)
Sample Collection Date: 11/5/2023
Reviewer\Date: April Lafferty 11/21/2023 and 1/31/2024
Report Date\Work Order No.: S2311115
Primary
Sample
Duplicate
Sample
RM19 RM100
Analyte Units CRL
Primary
Sample
Duplicate
Sample
RPD
(%)
Major Ions Carbonate as CaCO3 mg/L 2 6 6 NA
Bicarbonate as CaCO3 mg/L 2 151 150 1%
Calcium (Ca)mg/L 1 18 19 5%
Chloride (Cl)mg/L 1 5 5 0%
Fluoride (F)mg/L 0.1 0.2 0.2 0%
Magnesium (Mg)mg/L 1 21 21 0%
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N mg/L 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 NA
Nitrogen, Nitrite + Nitrate as N mg/L 0.1 1.6 1.4 13%
Potassium (K)mg/L 1 3 3 0%
Sodium (Na)mg/L 1 20 20 0%
Sulfate (SO4)mg/L 1 18 18 0%
Physical Properties TDS mg/L 20 210 200 5%
Metals -Total Recoverable Arsenic (As)mg/L 0.003 <0.003 <0.003 NA
Barium (Ba)mg/L 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 NA
Cadmium (Cd)mg/L 0.001 <0.001 <0.001 NA
Chromium (Cr)mg/L 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 NA
Copper (Cu)mg/L 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 NA
Lead (Pb)mg/L 0.002 <0.002 <0.002 NA
Mercury (Hg)mg/L 0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 NA
Molybdenum (Mo)mg/L 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 NA
Selenium (Se)mg/L 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 NA
Silver (Ag)mg/L 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 NA
Uranium (U)mg/L 0.0003 0.0027 0.0028 4%
Zinc (Zn)mg/L 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 NA
Radionuclides Gross Alpha pCi/L 47 43
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U pCi/L <3 <3
precision (±)pCi/L 1.1 1.1 NA
Gross Alpha MDC pCi/L 3 3.0 2.0 RER
Radium-226 (Ra-226)pCi/L 0.3 0.4
precision (±)pCi/L 0.1 0.1 0.71
Radium-226 MDC pCi/L 0.2 0.2 0.2 RER
NA = Not Applicable
ND = Non-Detection at Reporting Limit or MDC
MDC = Lab reported Minimum Detectable Quantity
RER = Replicate Error Ratio = absolute value (original value - dup value)/sqrt[(orig sample error)^2 +(dup error)^2), should be <2
RPD = Relative Percent Difference = absolute value of (primary- duplicate)/((primary+duplicate)/2) <15% if greater than 3 times the MDL
ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
AR
HC

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report - 2023
February 2024

ATTACHMENT D
WATER QUALITY DATA TABLES AND GRAPHS

RM1
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Date
Ag
(mg/L)
As
(mg/L)
Ba
(mg/L)
Ca
(mg/L)
Cd
(mg/L)
Cl
(mg/L)
CO3
(mg/L)Cr (mg/L)
Cu
(mg/L)F (mg/L)
Gross
Alpha
(pCi/L)
Calculated
Adjusted Gross
Alpha (pCi/L)
HCO3
(mg/L)
Hg
(mg/L)K (mg/L)
Mg
(mg/L)
Mo
(mg/L)
Na
(mg/L)
NH3 as
N (mg/L)
NO3+NO2
as N
(mg/L)Pb (mg/L)
Ra-226
(pCi/L)
Se
(mg/L)
SO4
(mg/L)
TDS
(mg/L)
Unat
(mg/L)
Zn
(mg/L)
4/26/03 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 <0.001 6.3 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 <0.001 <0.005 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 <0.005 23.8 188 0.0044 0.00275
12/1/03 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 <0.001 7 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 <0.001 <0.005 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 <0.005 35.1 249 0.0133 0.01
3/22/04 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21.8 <0.001 5.6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 195 <0.001 2.8 26.5 <0.005 22.5 <0.1 1.65 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 23.6 210 0.0043 0.00334
9/20/04 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21.3 <0.001 5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 197 <0.001 3.7 25.6 <0.005 20.8 <0.1 1.64 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 22 228 0.004 <0.01
12/13/04 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 24.6 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 200 <0.001 2.8 28.2 <0.005 19.6 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 22 218 0.0036 0.02
3/21/05 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 23.3 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 203 <0.001 2.5 25.3 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.1 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 21 235 0.004 0.01
6/13/05 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 23 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 200 <0.001 2.6 26.3 <0.005 21.5 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 22 185 0.0042 0.01
9/12/05 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 22 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 209 <0.001 2.2 26.2 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 23 190 0.0044 0.01
12/14/05 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20.8 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 198 <0.001 2.4 24.6 <0.005 20.3 <0.1 1.9 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 25 214 0.0042 <0.01
3/12/06 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 22.1 <0.001 6 2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 195 <0.001 2.7 26.7 <0.005 21.9 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 25 192 0.0044 0.00609
6/12/06 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21.2 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 187 <0.001 2.8 27.8 <0.005 23.4 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 32 194 0.0044 0.00562
9/18/06 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20.9 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 196 <0.001 2.6 26.5 <0.005 22.8 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 24 236 0.0046 0.00258
12/9/06 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21.1 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 187 <0.001 2.8 26 <0.005 22.5 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 25 206 0.0044 0.01
3/12/07 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21.2 <0.001 5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 6.6 3.62 195 <0.001 2.8 27.2 <0.005 23 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 25 196 0.0044 0.00637
6/25/07 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21.2 <0.001 5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 5.9 <3 200 <0.001 2.7 27.9 <0.005 21.7 <0.1 2 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 26 208 0.0051 0.00547
9/1/07 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 18.8 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 6.1 3.19 198 <0.001 2.8 24 <0.005 21.7 <0.1 1.9 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 28 214 0.0043 0.00537
12/4/07 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20.1 <0.001 <1 4 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 9.1 6.19 189 <0.001 2.6 22.7 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 23 197 0.0043 0.00534
3/25/08 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 22.3 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 202 <0.001 2.7 25.8 <0.005 21.5 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 21 192-J 0.0039 <0.01
6/29/08 <0.005-J <0.003 0.1 23 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 8.3 5.73 199 <0.001 3 27 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.38-J <0.002 0.2 <0.005 25 185-J 0.0038-J <0.01
9/22/08 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 23.3 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 195 <0.001 2.6 25.2 <0.005 19.6 <0.1 1.46-J <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 23 200 0.0039 <0.01
12/22/08 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20.2 <0.001 5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 193 <0.001 2.5 22.6 <0.005 18 <0.1-J 1.2 <0.002 0.22 <0.005 22 208 0.0041-J <0.01
2/8/09 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 22-J <0.001 5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 194 <0.001 3 24-J <0.005 18-J <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 24 200 0.004 0.01
4/12/09 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20 <0.001 6 2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 196 <0.001 3-J 22 <0.005 20-J <0.1-J 1.3 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 20 204 0.0038 <0.01
8/24/09 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21 <0.001 4 6 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 192-J <0.001 3 23 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.54 <0.005 24 198 0.0039 <0.01
8/25/09 <0.005 <0.003 0.12 21 <0.001 6.8-R <20 <0.01 <0.01 0.21-R 5.3-R 170 <0.001 3 23 <0.005 19 <0.1-R 1.4 <0.002 0.24-R <0.005 21-R 210 0.0039 0.015
10/18/09 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 22 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 205-J <0.001 3 25 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 22 213 0.0039 <0.01
2/1/10 <0.005-R <0.003-R 0.1-R 21-R <0.001-R 5-R <2-R <0.01-R <0.01-R 0.2-R 215-R <0.001-R 2-R 23-R <0.005-R 19-R <0.1-R 1.5-R <0.002-R <0.2 <0.005-R 21-R 178-R 0.0041-R <0.01-R
3/22/10 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 214-J <0.001 3 23 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.005 21 187 0.004 <0.01
4/12/10 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 22 <0.001 5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 214-R <0.001 3 24 <0.005 21 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.33 <0.005 21 195 0.004 <0.01
8/17/10 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 20 <0.001 6 <20-J <0.01 <0.01 0.27 4.3 <3 170-J <0.001 2.5 23 <0.005 21 <0.1 1.94 <0.002 <0.29-R <0.005 20 200 0.0042 0.025
10/18/10 <0.005 <0.003 0.12 22 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.27 5.7 3.20 160 <0.001 2.8 24 <0.005 20 1.4 <0.002 0.29 <0.005 20 220 0.0037 0.008
1/24/11 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 21 <0.001 6.4 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.27 6.7 4.40 160 <0.001 2.6 23 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.25 <0.005 20 200 0.0034 <0.0075
4/11/11 <0.005 <0.003 0.12 21 <0.001 6.1 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.25 4.6 <3 160 <0.001 2.4 24 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.32 <0.005 20 216 0.004 <0.0075
7/25/11 <0.005 <0.003 0.12 21 <0.001 6.5 <4 <0.01 <0.01 0.26 5.3 <3 160 <0.001 2.8 25 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.26 <0.005 20 230 0.0042 <0.0037
10/17/11 <0.005 <0.003 0.12 20 <0.001 6.3 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.24 7.1 4.46 160 <0.001 2.6 24 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.31 <0.005 20 210 0.0039 0.0074
2/13/12 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 20 <0.001 6.4 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.21 7.6 5.03 160 <0.001 2.5 22 <0.005 17 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.29 <0.005 20 200 0.0038 <0.0037
4/30/12 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 20 <0.001 6.2 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.25 5.2 <3 160 <0.001 2.4 23 <0.005 19-J <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.3-J <0.005 19 220 0.0038 <0.0016
7/23/12 <0.005 <0.003 0.12 21 <0.001 7.7 <4 <0.01 <0.01 0.26 4.8 <3 160 <0.001 3.2 24 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.39 <0.005 20 210 0.0036 <0.0016
10/1/12 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 20 <0.001 6.9 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.26 5.8 3.63 160 <0.001 2.8 23 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.43 <0.005 20 210 0.0032 0.0014
2/19/13 <0.005 <0.003 0.12 21 <0.001 6.3 <8 <0.01 <0.01 0.27 7.6 5.03 160 <0.001 2.7 24 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.27 <0.005 20 210 0.0038 0.0049
5/13/13 <0.005 <0.003 0.12 21 <0.001 8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.31 5.9 3.73 160 <0.001 3.2 23 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.31 <0.005 22 230 0.0032 0.0042
7/15/13 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 20 <0.001 6.6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.25 7.4 4.96 160 <0.001 2.6 24 <0.005 18-J <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.31 <0.005 20 220 0.0036 <0.01
11/4/13 <0.005 <0.003 0.12 20 <0.001 6.7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.26 5.9 3.33 160 <0.001 2.4 23 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.33 <0.005 21 210 0.0038 <0.01
2/26/14 <0.005 <0.003 0.12 21 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.24 4.9 <3 160 <0.001 2.7 23 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.26 <0.005 22 210 0.004 <0.0052
4/29/14 <0.005 <0.003 0.12 21 <0.001 6.5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.23 5.4 <3 160 <0.001 2.7 24 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.32 <0.005 20 210 0.004 0.007
7/21/14 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 21 <0.001 6.6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.23 6.2 3.62 160 <0.001 2.7 24 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.33 <0.005 20 240 0.0038 0.0078
10/27/14 <0.005 <0.003-J 0.12 20 <0.001 6.5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.23 5.2 <3 160 <0.001 2.7 23 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.36 0.011-R 19 210 0.0039 0.0056-J
10/27/14 <0.003 <0.005 <0.0015
2/23/15 <0.005 0.0032-R 0.12 21 <0.001 6.4 <2 <0.01 <0.0022 0.23 5.2 <3 160 <0.001 2.5 24 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.31 <0.005 20 200 0.0038 <0.01
2/23/15 <0.003
5/11/15 <0.005 <0.003 0.12 20 <0.001 6.7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.23 6.5 3.71 160 <0.001 2.8 24 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.34 <0.005 20 210 0.0041 <0.01
8/10/15 <0.005 <0.003 0.12 22 <0.001 6.5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.23 4.4 <3 160 <0.001 2.9 24 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.26 <0.005 20 210 0.0041 <0.01
10/19/15 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 21 <0.001 7.1 <8 <0.01 <0.01 0.24 7 4.48 160 <0.001 2.5 22 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.29 <0.005 21 200 0.0037 <0.01
3/7/16 <0.005 <0.003 0.12 22 <0.001 6.7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.24 7.2 4.41 170 <0.001 2.7 23 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.65 0.0058 21 150 0.0041 <0.01
4/29/16 <0.005 <0.003 0.12 20 <0.001 6.9 <8 <0.01 <0.01 0.23 7.2 4.55 160 <0.001 2.7 23 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.31 <0.005 21 230 0.0039 <0.01
8/4/16 <0.005 <0.003 0.12 22 <0.001 6.4 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.23 5.9 3.45 170 <0.001 3 23 <0.005 19 <0.1-R 1.4 <0.002 0.24 <0.005 19 180 0.0036 <0.01
9/27/16 <0.1
10/19/16 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 6 5 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6.2 4.3 160 <0.001 3 23 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 17 210 0.0029 <0.01
2/14/17 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 21 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 7.5 5.7 165 <0.001 3 24 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.7 <0.005 18 200 0.0026 <0.01
5/1/17 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20 <0.001 6 4 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 8.7-R 6-R 160 <0.001 3 22 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 1.9 <0.005 17 220 0.0039 <0.01
5/1/17 6.1 3.4 1.5
7/17/17 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20 <0.001 6 5 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 9.1 6.8 160 <0.001 3 22 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.5 <0.005 18 240 0.0034 <0.01
10/30/17 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20 <0.001 6 6 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 4.9 <3 159 <0.001 3 21 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.2 <0.005 18 220 0.0037 0.01
RM1
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Date
Ag
(mg/L)
As
(mg/L)
Ba
(mg/L)
Ca
(mg/L)
Cd
(mg/L)
Cl
(mg/L)
CO3
(mg/L)Cr (mg/L)
Cu
(mg/L)F (mg/L)
Gross
Alpha
(pCi/L)
Calculated
Adjusted Gross
Alpha (pCi/L)
HCO3
(mg/L)
Hg
(mg/L)K (mg/L)
Mg
(mg/L)
Mo
(mg/L)
Na
(mg/L)
NH3 as
N (mg/L)
NO3+NO2
as N
(mg/L)Pb (mg/L)
Ra-226
(pCi/L)
Se
(mg/L)
SO4
(mg/L)
TDS
(mg/L)
Unat
(mg/L)
Zn
(mg/L)
2/20/18 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20 <0.001 6 2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.7 3.2 160 <0.001 3 22 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.8 <0.005 18 210 0.0037 0.01
4/24/18 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20 <0.001 6 5 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 7.7 5.2 159 <0.001 3 21 <0.005 21 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 1.3 <0.005 18 200 0.0037 <0.01
7/8/18 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 6 5 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6.9 4.8 161 <0.001 3 22 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.8-J <0.005 17 220 0.0031 <0.01
10/9/18 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20 <0.001 6 3 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6.6 4 168 <0.001 3 21 <0.005 23 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 1.5 <0.005 19 200 0.0038 <0.01
1/25/19 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20 <0.001 6 6 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 6 3.8 163 <0.001 3 21 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.9 <0.005 17 210 0.0036 <0.01
4/28/19 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20 <0.001 6 6 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.3 2.1 160 <0.001 3 22 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.2 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 16 220 0.0033 <0.01
7/28/19 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 6 10 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 7.5 5.4 156 <0.0002 3 22 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.2 <0.002 0.5 <0.005 17 200 0.0031 <0.01
11/4/19 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 19 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 8 5.6 168 <0.0002 3 21 <0.005 21 <0.1 1.2 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 17 190 0.0036 <0.01
2/16/20 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 8.5 6 164 <0.0002 3 22 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.2 <0.002 0.7 <0.005 17 220 0.0037 <0.01
5/24/20 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 22 <0.001 6 3 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.7 <3 168 <0.0002 3 24 <0.005 19 0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.5 <0.005 17 220 0.0034 <0.01
7/7/20 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 22 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.9 3.2 165 <0.0002 2 24 <0.005 21 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 17 220 0.0039 0.01
10/5/20 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.4 2.1 162 <0.0002 4 <0.003 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 18 210 0.0035 <0.01
1/22/21 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 7 4.4 167 <0.0002 3 21 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.2 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 17 210 0.0038 <0.01
4/1/21 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 4.8 2.2 172 <0.0002 3 24 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 17 220 0.0038 <0.01
7/9/21 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21 <0.001 6 5 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.2 <2 162 <0.0002 3 23 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.1 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 17 220 0.0037 <0.01
10/3/21 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 3.7 <2 179 <0.0002 3 23 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 18 210 0.0039 <0.01
2/5/22 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 6.5 4.2 172 <0.0002 3 23 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.2 <0.005 17 210 0.0033 <0.01
4/2/22 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20 <0.001 6 5 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 5.9 3.3 176 <0.0002 3 24 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.9 <0.005 17 200 0.0039 <0.01
7/9/22 <0.005 <0.003 <5 21 <0.001 6 4-J <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6-J 3.8-J 172 <0.0002 3 23 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.2 <0.005 17 210 0.0032 <0.01
10/24/22 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21 <0.001 6 3 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 6.9 4.3 168 <0.0002 2 22 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 17 210 0.0038 <0.01
3/10/23 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 22 <0.001 6 6 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 7.5 4.9 160 <0.0002 3 24 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.5 <0.005 16 210 0.0038 <0.01
4/22/23 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20 <0.001 6 9 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 5 2.4 154 <0.0002 3 23 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.5 <0.005 16 190 0.0038 <0.01
RM2R
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Date Ag (mg/L)
As
(mg/L)
Ba
(mg/L)
Ca
(mg/L)Cd (mg/L)
Cl
(mg/L)
CO3
(mg/L)
Cr
(mg/L)
Cu
(mg/L)
F
(mg/L)
Gross
Alpha
(pCi/L)
Calculated
Adjusted
Gross
Alpha
(pCi/L)
HCO3
(mg/L)Hg (mg/L)
K
(mg/L)
Mg
(mg/L)
Mo
(mg/L)
Na
(mg/L)
NH3 as N
(mg/L)
NO3+NO2
as N
(mg/L)
Pb
(mg/L)
Ra-226
(pCi/L)
Se
(mg/L)
SO4
(mg/L)
TDS
(mg/L)
Unat
(mg/L)
Zn
(mg/L)
4/20/03 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 <0.001 10.7 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 <0.001 <0.005 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.005 28.9 177 0.0022 <0.01
11/30/03 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 <0.001 11.9 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 <0.001 <0.005 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 <0.005 30.2 225 0.0032 0.0042
3/23/04 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 22.5 <0.001 11.7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 173 <0.001 2.3 26.3 <0.005 18.6 <0.1 1.48 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 31.3 214 0.0031 0.0053
9/20/04 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 22.2 <0.001 10 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 167 <0.001 3 25.4 <0.005 17.2 <0.1 1.25 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 29 220 0.0028 0.01
11/28/04 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 22 <0.001 13 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 165 <0.001 2.3 26.6 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 29 208 0.003 0.0072
3/20/05 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 24.1 <0.001 14 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 173 <0.001 2.2 27.1 <0.005 17.6 <0.1 1.4 0.004 <0.2 <0.005 35 232 0.0037 0.0072
6/13/05 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 25 <0.001 14 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 168 <0.001 2.3 28.2 <0.005 18.7 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 38 230 0.0044 0.0072
9/11/05 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 26.7 <0.001 15 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 180 <0.001 2 27.9 <0.005 18.6 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 42 212 0.0046 0.0051
12/13/05 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 23.2 <0.001 14 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 171 <0.001 2.2 25.6 <0.005 18.8 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 38 254 0.0037 <0.01
3/11/06 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 25.1 <0.001 13 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 174 <0.001 2.4 26.7 <0.005 18.1 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 36 206 0.0033 0.007
6/11/06 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 22.8 <0.001 13 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 159 <0.001 2.5 25.7 <0.005 16.2 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 41 198 0.0035 0.007
9/19/06 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 24.4 <0.001 12 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 166 <0.001 2.3 26.5 <0.005 18.8 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 35 210 0.0036 0.0079
12/10/06 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 23.8 <0.001 14 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 162 <0.001 2.5 26.4 <0.005 19.2 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 37 210 0.0036 0.01
3/11/07 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 24.5 <0.001 12 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.2 <3 170 <0.001 2.6 27.4 <0.005 19.2 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 33 198 0.0035 0.01
6/25/07 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 23.9 <0.001 12 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 4.6 <3 176 <0.001 2.4 27 <0.005 17.6 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 32 202 0.0034 0.0062
9/2/07 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 22.4 <0.001 12 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5 <3 174 <0.001 2.5 24.3 <0.005 18.3 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 33 174 0.0032 0.0051
12/4/07 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21.1 <0.001 13 <2 <0.01 0.01 0.2 7.3 4.86 163 <0.001 2.3 23.2 <0.005 17 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 34 206 0.0036 0.0062
3/25/08 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 23.4 <0.001 14 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 171 <0.001 2.4 27.1 <0.005 19.3 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 35 203-J 0.0035 <0.01
6/30/08 <0.005-J <0.003 0.1 24 <0.001 12 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.4 3.44 174 <0.001 2 26 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.57-J <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 32 188 0.0029-J 0.02
9/22/08 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 24.3 <0.001 13 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 161 <0.001 2.4 28.3 <0.005 17.8 <0.1 2 <0.001 <0.2 <0.005 39 218 0.0036 <0.01
12/16/08 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 22.5 <0.001 12 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 163 <0.001 2.4 25.2 <0.005 17 <0.1 2 <0.001 <0.2 <0.005 34 210 0.0031 <0.01
2/8/09 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20-J <0.001 13 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 160 <0.001 2 23-J <0.005 17-J <0.1 1.9 <0.002 0.22 <0.005 40 213 0.0034 0.02
4/12/09 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 21 <0.001 13 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 172 <0.001 2-J 23 <0.005 18-J <0.1 1.8 <0.002 0.25 <0.005 32 214 0.003 <0.01
8/24/09 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 22 <0.001 12 3 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 165-J <0.001 3 24 <0.005 17 <0.1 2 <0.002 0.55 <0.005 36 192 0.0035 <0.01
12/7/09 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 21 <0.001 13 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 172-J <0.001 2 23 <0.005 17 <0.1 2.1 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 36 231 0.0034-J <0.01
2/1/10 <0.005-R <0.003-R <0.1-R 20-R <0.001-R 12-R <2-R <0.01-R <0.01-R 0.2-R 179-R <0.001-R 2-R 22-R <0.005-R 16-R <0.05-R 1.8-R <0.002-R 0.06 <0.005-R 32-R 135-R 0.0032-R <0.01-R
3/22/10 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 21 <0.001 13 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 185-J <0.001 3 23 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 <0.005 28 193 0.0031 <0.01
4/12/10 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 23 <0.001 12 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 186-R <0.001 3 26 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 0.21 <0.005 30 205 0.0031 <0.01
8/17/10 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 13 <20-J <0.01 <0.01 0.22 2.9 <3 140-J <0.001 2.5 23 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.9 <0.002 <0.46-R <0.005 29 210 0.0028 0.0088
10/18/10 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 22 <0.001 13 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.21 3.2 <3 140 <0.001 2.7 24 <0.005 18 1.9 <0.002 0.25 <0.005 30 210 0.003 <0.0075
1/24/11 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 21 <0.001 13 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.22 4 <3 140 <0.001 2.5 23 <0.005 16 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 0.25 <0.005 27 200 0.0028 0.022
4/11/11 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 21 <0.001 14 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 3.4 <3 130 <0.001 2.1 25 <0.005 17 <0.1 2.1 <0.002 0.47 <0.005 34 230 0.0034 0.016
7/25/11 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 21 <0.001 14 <4 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 5.6 3.43 140 <0.001 2.5 25 <0.005 17 <0.1 1.9 <0.002 0.24 0.0075 30 220 0.0032 0.014
10/17/11 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21 <0.001 14 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 3.1 <3 130 <0.001 2.2 25 <0.005 16 <0.1 2.2 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 33 220 0.0037 0.019
2/13/12 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 13 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 3.7 <3 140 <0.001 2.1 22 <0.005 15 <0.1 1.9 <0.002 0.25 <0.005 29 210 0.0029 0.0051
4/30/12 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 21 <0.001 13 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 3.9 <3 140 <0.001 2.1 24 <0.005 17 <0.1 1.9 <0.002 0.26-J <0.005 28 210 0.003 0.0039
7/23/12 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21 <0.001 14 <4 <0.01 <0.01 0.22 4 <3 140 <0.001 2.1 24 <0.005 17 <0.1 2 <0.002 0.27 0.0054 30 210 0.0028 0.0038
10/1/12 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 13 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.21 4.4 <3 130 <0.001 2.1 23 <0.005 16 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 0.24 <0.005 29 210 0.0027 0.003
2/19/13 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 22 <0.001 13 <8 <0.01 <0.01 0.23 7.1 5.14 140 <0.001 2.4 25 <0.005 17 <0.1 1.9 <0.002 0.21 <0.005 30 210 0.0029 0.0023
5/13/13 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 22 <0.001 15 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.26 3.6 <3 130 <0.001 2.8 24 <0.005 16 <0.1 2.2 <0.002 0.24 <0.005 33 230 0.0026 0.0025
7/15/13 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21 <0.001 14 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 5.1 3.14 130 <0.001 2.4 25 <0.005 16 <0.1 2.1 <0.002 0.26 0.0057 30 220 0.0029 <0.01
7/15/13 4 <3 <0.005 0.0032
11/4/13 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 14 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 3.6 <3 140 <0.001 2 23 <0.005 16 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 0.34 0.0059 30 220 0.0027 <0.01
2/24/14 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 20 <0.001 14 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4.3 <3 130 <0.001 2.3 23 <0.005 18 <0.1 2 <0.002 0.27 <0.005 31 200 0.0028 <0.0052
4/29/14 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 21 <0.001 13 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 3.6 <3 130 <0.001 2.4 25 <0.005 17 <0.1 2 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 30 210 0.003 <0.0015
7/21/14 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 21 <0.001 14 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4.9 <3 130 <0.001 2.4 24 <0.005 16 <0.1 1.9 <0.002 0.33 <0.005 30 220 0.003 0.0019
10/27/14 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 15 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4.9 <3 130 <0.001 2.3 23 <0.005 15 0.13 2.1 <0.002 0.28 0.0078 33 220 0.0031 <0.0015
2/23/15 <0.005 <0.003-R <0.1 21 <0.001 15 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4.2 <3 130 <0.001 2 25 <0.005 16 0.45 2 <0.002 0.31 0.0079 33 210 0.0032 <0.01
<0.003
5/11/15 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21 <0.001 14 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4.1 <3 130 <0.001 2.4 25 <0.005 16 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.26 <0.005 32 210 0.0034 <0.01
8/10/15 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 21 <0.001 14 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 3.7 <3 130 <0.001 2.5 24 <0.005 17 <0.1 2.1 <0.002 0.26 <0.005 30 210 0.0033 <0.01
10/19/15 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 21 <0.001 16 <8 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 6.3 4.19 130 <0.001 2.2 23 <0.005 18 0.18 2.1 <0.002 0.25 <0.005 35 210 0.0031 <0.01
3/7/16 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 22 <0.001 13 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4.1 <3 140 <0.001 2.4 24 <0.005 17 <0.1 2 <0.002 0.284 <0.005 29 180 0.003 <0.01
4/29/16 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 21 <0.001 14 <8 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4.2 <3 130 <0.001 2.4 24 <0.005 16 <0.1 2 <0.002 0.33 <0.005 31 230 0.0032 <0.01
8/4/16 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 22 <0.001 15 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4.3 <3 140 <0.001 2.6 23 <0.005 16 <0.1-R 0.04-R 0.0062 0.29 <0.005 34 220 0.0031 <0.01
9/27/16 <0.1 1.7 0.0082
10/19/16 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 23 <0.001 15 4 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.8 4.2 151 <0.001 2 25 <0.005 19 <0.1 2.1 0.005 <0.2 <0.005 31 230 0.0024 <0.01
2/14/17 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 23 <0.001 16 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.1 3.2 137 <0.001 3 27 <0.005 17 <0.1 2.5 0.008 <0.2 <0.005 37 220 0.0028 <0.01
5/2/17 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 23 <0.001 16 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.3 3.4 135 <0.001 3 25 <0.005 17 <0.1 2.4 0.006 1.2 <0.005 37 240 0.0029 <0.01
7/17/17 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 21 <0.001 13 3 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.7 3.7 134 <0.001 2 23 <0.005 16 <0.1 2 0.007 <0.2 <0.005 30 250 0.0029 <0.01
10/31/17 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 21 <0.001 16 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.8 3.1 145 <0.001 2 24 <0.005 18 <0.1 2.3 0.005 <0.2 <0.005 36 250 0.0025 <0.01
2/19/18 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 21 <0.001 13 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.7 4.3 140 <0.001 2 22 <0.005 16 <0.1 1.9 <0.002 1.4 <0.005 27 200 0.0022 <0.01
RM2R
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Date Ag (mg/L)
As
(mg/L)
Ba
(mg/L)
Ca
(mg/L)Cd (mg/L)
Cl
(mg/L)
CO3
(mg/L)
Cr
(mg/L)
Cu
(mg/L)
F
(mg/L)
Gross
Alpha
(pCi/L)
Calculated
Adjusted
Gross
Alpha
(pCi/L)
HCO3
(mg/L)Hg (mg/L)
K
(mg/L)
Mg
(mg/L)
Mo
(mg/L)
Na
(mg/L)
NH3 as N
(mg/L)
NO3+NO2
as N
(mg/L)
Pb
(mg/L)
Ra-226
(pCi/L)
Se
(mg/L)
SO4
(mg/L)
TDS
(mg/L)
Unat
(mg/L)
Zn
(mg/L)
4/23/18 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 22 <0.001 13 2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.1 2.5 143 <0.001 2 22 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 0.7 <0.005 29 200 0.0023 <0.01
7/9/18 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 21 <0.001 13 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.3 3.5 141 <0.001 2 23 <0.005 16 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 0.5-J <0.005 28 220 0.0027 <0.01
10/8/18 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 21 <0.001 13 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.5 3.7 142 <0.001 2 21 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 28 210 0.0027 <0.01
1/25/19 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 12 3 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4 2.8 138 <0.001 2 21 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 1.1 <0.005 24 220 0.0026 <0.01
4/28/19 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 11 3 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.1 3.3 138 <0.001 3 21 <0.005 17 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 23 210 0.0027 <0.01
7/28/19 <0.01 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 12 4 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 2.6 <2 135 <0.0002 2 23 <0.01 16 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.2 <0.01 24 210 0.0026 <0.01
11/4/19 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 11 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.5 2.7 142 <0.0002 2 21 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.6 <0.005 24 240 0.0026 <0.01
2/16/20 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 11 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.8 4.3 138 <0.0002 3 21 <0.005 16 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.5 <0.005 23 220 0.0022 <0.01
5/24/20 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 11 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 2.9 <2 139 <0.0002 2 23 <0.005 16 0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 22 210 0.0021 <0.01
7/6/20 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21 <0.001 12 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.4 3.1 139 <0.0002 <2 24 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 25 210 0.0034 <0.01
10/5/20 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 12 2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.8 4.1 136 <0.0002 3 22 <0.005 16 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 23 220 0.0025 <0.01
1/22/21 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 11 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 3.7 2.1 141 <0.0002 2 22 <0.005 16 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 23 210 0.0025 <0.01
4/1/21 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 11 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.6 3 138 <0.0002 2 23 <0.005 17 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.8 <0.005 22 200 0.0025 <0.01
7/9/21 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 11 3 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 3.5 <2 137 <0.0002 3 23 <0.005 17 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.2 <0.005 22 210 0.0028 <0.01
10/3/21 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 19 <0.001 11 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.8 2.8 144 <0.0002 2 21 <0.005 17 <0.1 2 <0.002 1.1 <0.005 22 200 0.0029 <0.01
2/5/22 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 10 2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.2 2.7 144 <0.0002 2 21 <0.005 15 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 20 200 0.0023 <0.01
4/2/22 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 11 2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.9 4.1 145 <0.0002 2 22 <0.005 17 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.7 <0.005 21 200 0.0027 <0.01
7/8/22 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 11 2-J <0.01 <0.01 0.2 3.3-J <2-J 144 <0.0002 2 22 <0.005 16 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 21 200 0.0023 <0.01
10/24/22 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 11 2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.9 3.1 139 <0.0002 2 21 <0.005 16 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 20 210 0.0026 <0.01
3/10/23 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 11 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.8 3.9 136 <0.0002 2 24 <0.005 16 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 22 210 0.0028 <0.01
4/22/23 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 19 <0.001 10 4 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 3.4 <2 134 <0.0002 2 22 <0.005 17 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 20 200 0.0028 <0.01
RM7
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Date Ag (mg/L)
As
(mg/L)
Ba
(mg/L)
Ca
(mg/L)Cd (mg/L)Cl (mg/L)
CO3
(mg/L)Cr (mg/L)
Cu
(mg/L)F (mg/L)
Gross
Alpha
(pCi/L)
Calculated
Adjusted
Gross Alpha
(pCi/L)
HCO3
(mg/L)Hg (mg/L)
K
(mg/L)
Mg
(mg/L)
Mo
(mg/L)
Na
(mg/L)
NH3 as N
(mg/L)
NO3+NO2
as N (mg/L)Pb (mg/L)
Ra-226
(pCi/L)
Se
(mg/L)
SO4
(mg/L)
TDS
(mg/L)
Unat
(mg/L)
Zn
(mg/L)
4/26/03 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 <0.001 6 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 <0.001 <0.005 0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.005 26.4 171 0.0032 <0.01
11/30/03 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 <0.001 6.3 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 <0.001 <0.005 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 <0.005 23 225 0.0033 0.01
3/23/04 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 22.2 <0.001 5.6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 188 <0.001 2.4 24.3 <0.005 21.3 <0.1 1.48 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 24.2 212 0.0036 <0.01
9/21/04 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21 <0.001 5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 180 <0.001 1.9 23.4 <0.005 18.5 <0.1 1.35 <0.002 0.5 <0.005 23 204 0.0027 <0.01
11/7/04 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 22.1 <0.001 4 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 190 <0.001 2.5 25.2 <0.005 21.3 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 22 189 0.0029 <0.01
3/20/05 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20.9 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 185 <0.001 2.1 24.1 <0.005 19.4 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 22 211 0.0029 <0.01
6/12/05 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21.2 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 180 <0.001 1.6 24 <0.005 20.2 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.2 <0.005 23 188 0.0031 <0.01
9/11/05 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20.6 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 189 <0.001 1.9 23.8 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 23 170 0.0031 <0.01
12/12/05 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 19.9 <0.001 4 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 186 <0.001 2.1 22.2 <0.005 19.3 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 23 215 0.0029 <0.01
3/11/06 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21.3 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 186 <0.001 2.3 24.6 <0.005 20.1 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 24 180 0.0031 <0.01
6/11/06 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 18.4 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 173 <0.001 2.5 22.1 <0.005 18.1 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 30 178 0.003 <0.01
9/19/06 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21.3 <0.001 4 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 177 <0.001 2.2 24.4 <0.005 20.5 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 24 184 0.0032 <0.01
12/9/06 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21.1 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 182 <0.001 2.4 24.4 <0.005 20.8 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 24 194 0.0033 <0.01
3/12/07 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21.4 <0.001 5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.8 3.70 185 <0.001 2.5 25.3 <0.005 21 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 24 178 0.0031 <0.01
6/24/07 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21 <0.001 3 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 5.3 3.20 189 <0.001 2.4 24.8 <0.005 19.7 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 24 188 0.0031 <0.01
9/1/07 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 19.7 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 4.9 <3 184 <0.001 2.5 22.8 <0.005 19.8 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 25 180 0.003 <0.01
12/3/07 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 19 <0.001 5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.7 3.53 183 <0.001 2.3 21.5 <0.005 18.3 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.5 <0.005 25 185 0.0032 <0.01
3/25/08 <0.005 <0.003 0.1-J 21.3 <0.001 5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 189 <0.001 2.4 24.4 <0.005 21.2 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 26 110-R 0.0034 <0.01
6/29/08 <0.005-J <0.003 0.1-J 21 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6.6 4.16 183 <0.001 3 24 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.43-J <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 24 181 0.0036-J <0.01
9/23/08 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 22.6 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 182 <0.001 2.2 24.8 <0.005 19.4 <0.1 1.49-J <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 25 192 0.0032 <0.01
12/16/08 <0.005 <0.003 0.1-J 21.9 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 182 <0.001 2.3 24.4 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 <0.2-J <0.005 22 200 0.0037 <0.01
2/8/09 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21-J <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 179 <0.001 2 22-J <0.005 20-J <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 25 186 0.0037 <0.01
4/12/09 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 19 <0.001 5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 186 <0.001 2-J 21 <0.005 19-J <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 23 202 0.0032 <0.01
8/24/09 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20 <0.001 5 5 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 182-J <0.001 2 22 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 26 190 0.0033 <0.01
10/18/09 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 194-J <0.001 2 21 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 22 182 0.0029 <0.01
2/1/10 <0.005-R <0.003-R 0.1-R 21-R <0.001-R 5-R <2-R <0.01-R <0.01-R 0.2-R 199-R <0.001-R 2-R 22-R <0.005-R 20-R <0.1-R 1.4-R <0.002-R 0.2 <0.005-R 23-R 126-R 0.003-R <0.01-R
3/22/10 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 199-J <0.001 2 22 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.005 22 190 0.0029 <0.01
4/12/10 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 22 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 202-R <0.001 2 24 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 22 205 0.003 <0.01
8/17/10 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 19 <0.001 5.6 <20-J <0.01 <0.01 0.23 3.1 <3 160-J <0.001 2.1 22 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 <0.2-R <0.005 21 190 0.0027 <0.01
10/18/10 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20 <0.001 5.7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.22 4.6 <3 150 <0.001 2.4 22 <0.005 20 1.5 <0.002 0.207 <0.005 22 190 0.0037 <0.01
1/24/11 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 20 <0.001 6.1 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.22 5.6 3.70 150 <0.001 2.3 22 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.28 <0.005 21 200 0.0028 <0.01
4/11/11 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 20 <0.001 5.8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.21 4.1 <3 150 <0.001 2 23 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.35 <0.005 22 200 0.0031 <0.01
7/25/11 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 20 <0.001 6 <4 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 3.8 <3 150 <0.001 2.4 23 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.22 <0.005 21 210 0.0029 <0.01
10/17/11 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 20 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.21 5.1 <3 150 <0.001 2.2 23 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.26 0.0055 22 190 0.0034 <0.01
2/13/12 <0.005 0.049 0.1 19 <0.001 6.1 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5 <3 150 <0.001 2.2 21 <0.005 17 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.215 0.0057 22 200 0.0038 <0.01
4/30/12 <0.005 <0.003-R 0.1 20 <0.001 5.8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.21 5.1 <3 150 <0.001 2.1 22 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.26-J <0.005 21 200 0.004 <0.01
7/23/12 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 20 <0.001 6.2 <4 <0.01 <0.01 0.26 4.9 <3 150 <0.001 2.1 22 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.35 <0.005 22 180 0.0038 <0.01
10/1/12 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 19 <0.001 6.3 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.23 3 <3 150 <0.001 2.1 21 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.24 <0.005 23 210 0.0036 <0.01
2/19/13 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 20 <0.001 5.9 <8 <0.01 <0.01 0.23 7.1 4.60 150 <0.001 2.3 23 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.213 <0.005 23 200 0.0037 0.018
5/13/13 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 21 <0.001 7.2 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.28 5.2 <3 150 <0.001 2.7 22 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.222 <0.005 24 200 0.0036 <0.01
7/15/13 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 20 <0.001 6.3 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.21 5.7 3.20 150 <0.001 2.5 23 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 21 200 0.0037 <0.01
11/4/13 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 19 <0.001 6.3 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.21 5.9 3.19 150 <0.001 2.2 22 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.33 <0.005 22 210 0.004 0.01
2/24/14 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 20 <0.001 6.5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 3.9 <3 150 <0.001 2.4 21 <0.005 21 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.29 <0.005 23 200 0.0038 <0.01
4/28/14 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 20 <0.001 6.1 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.21 5.4 <3 150 <0.001 2.6 22 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 22 200 0.0047 0.013
4/28/14 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 21 <0.001 5.4 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4.6 <3 150 <0.001 2.7 22 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.24 <0.005 19 200 0.0044 <0.01
4/28/14 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 20 <0.001 5.7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5 <3 150 <0.001 2.7 23 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.24 <0.005 20 200 0.0044 <0.01
7/21/14 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20 <0.001 6.4 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.5 <3 150 <0.001 2.5 22 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 22 220 0.0039 0.01
10/27/14 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 20 <0.001 6.3 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.6 <3 150 <0.001 2.4 21 <0.005 17 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.22 <0.005 22 200 0.0039 0.018
2/23/15 <0.005 <0.003-R 0.11 20 <0.001 6.1 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 6 3.76 150 <0.001 2 22 <0.005 17 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.27 <0.005 21 200 0.0033 0.011
2/23/15 <0.003
5/11/15 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 20 <0.001 6.3 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4.8 <3 150 <0.001 2.4 22 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.27 <0.005 22 200 0.0035 0.013
8/10/15 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 20 <0.001 6.3 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4 <3 150 <0.001 2.5 22 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.26 <0.005 22 210 0.0038 0.023
10/19/15 <0.005 <0.003 0.10 20 <0.001 6.7 <8 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6.2 3.68 150 <0.001 2.2 20 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.24 <0.005 23 180 0.0037 <0.01
3/7/16 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 21 <0.001 6.4 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.8 3.28 150 <0.001 2.4 22 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.248 <0.005 23 20-R 0.0037 0.034
3/7/16 220
4/29/16 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 20 <0.001 6.4 <8 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4.1 <3 190 <0.001 2.4 22 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.22 <0.005 23 210 0.0033 0.022
8/4/16 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 20 <0.001 6.2 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 2.7 <3 150 <0.001 2.6 22 <0.005 19 <0.1-R 1.5 <0.002 0.25 <0.005 22 190 0.0032 0.018
9/27/16 <0.1
10/18/16 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 5 4 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.1 3.4 148 <0.001 2 22 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.5 <0.005 19 210 0.0025 <0.01
2/15/17 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6.2 4.6 148 <0.001 2 22 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 20 190 0.0024 <0.01
5/2/17 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.2 3.7 151 <0.001 2 21 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 19 210 0.0022 <0.01
7/17/17 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 5 4 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 7 5 167 <0.001 2 20 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 19 220 0.0029 <0.01
10/30/17 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 5 3 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.5 3.3 155 <0.001 2 20 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 19 210 0.0032 <0.01
2/19/18 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 17 <0.001 6 2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 7.6 5.3 150 <0.001 2 20 <0.005 21 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.7 <0.005 20 200 0.0035 <0.01
4/24/18 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 6 4 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 <2 <2 147 <0.001 2 19 <0.005 21 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.5 <0.005 20 190 0.0023 <0.01
RM7
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Date Ag (mg/L)
As
(mg/L)
Ba
(mg/L)
Ca
(mg/L)Cd (mg/L)Cl (mg/L)
CO3
(mg/L)Cr (mg/L)
Cu
(mg/L)F (mg/L)
Gross
Alpha
(pCi/L)
Calculated
Adjusted
Gross Alpha
(pCi/L)
HCO3
(mg/L)Hg (mg/L)
K
(mg/L)
Mg
(mg/L)
Mo
(mg/L)
Na
(mg/L)
NH3 as N
(mg/L)
NO3+NO2
as N (mg/L)Pb (mg/L)
Ra-226
(pCi/L)
Se
(mg/L)
SO4
(mg/L)
TDS
(mg/L)
Unat
(mg/L)
Zn
(mg/L)
7/9/18 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 19 <0.001 5 4 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 3.7 <3 148 <0.001 2 21 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.5-J <0.005 19 200 0.0032 0.02
10/8/18 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 6 4 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5 3.2 156 <0.001 2 20 <0.005 23 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 20 190 0.0026 <0.01
1/26/19 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 5 4 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5 3.9 152 <0.001 3 20 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 1.9 <0.005 19 200 0.0022 <0.01
4/28/19 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 5 5 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4 2.3 152 <0.001 3 21 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.2 <0.005 18 210 0.0025 <0.01
7/28/19 <0.01 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 6 5 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.3 2.7 150 <0.0002 2 22 <0.01 18 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 <0.2 <0.01 19 210 0.0024 <0.01
11/3/19 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 <4 <2 156 <0.0002 2 20 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 19 220 0.0025 <0.01
2/16/20 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6.1 4.4 150 <0.0002 3 20 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 20 210 0.0024 <0.01
5/24/20 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.4 3.8 153 <0.0002 2 22 <0.005 19 0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 19 210 0.0024 <0.01
7/7/20 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6.1 3.9 153 <0.0002 2 23 <0.005 21 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 20 210 0.0032 <0.01
10/5/20 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.3 3.5 153 <0.0002 3 22 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 20 200 0.0026 <0.01
1/22/21 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 18 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 3.5 <2 156 <0.0002 2 20 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 19 200 0.0028 <0.01
4/1/21 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 18 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.5 3.6 154 <0.0002 2 22 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.8 <0.005 19 200 0.0028 <0.01
7/9/21 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 19 <0.001 5 3 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 3.9 <2 151 <0.0002 3 23 <0.005 20 <0.1 <0.1 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 20 210 0.0028 <0.01
10/3/21 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.8 4 159 <0.0002 3 21 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.9 <0.005 20 200 0.0026 <0.01
2/5/22 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20 <0.001 5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.3 3.5 160 <0.0002 2 22 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 18 200 0.0027 <0.01
4/2/22 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 18 <0.001 5 2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 3.5 <2 162 <0.0002 2 22 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.5 <0.005 18 200 0.0029 <0.01
7/9/22 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 6 3-J <0.01 <0.01 0.2 <5-J 2.5-J 161 <0.0002 2 22 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 19 270 0.0024 <0.01
10/16/22 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.1 3.5 156 <0.0002 3 24 <0.005 21 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 1.1 <0.005 18 270 0.0024 <0.01
3/11/23 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20 <0.001 5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.8 3.9 153 <0.0002 2 23 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.5 <0.005 18 210 0.0028 <0.01
4/24/23 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 5 3 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4 2.5 151 <0.0002 2 22 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 18 190 0.0023 <0.01
RM8
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Date Ag (mg/L)As (mg/L)
Ba
(mg/L)
Ca
(mg/L)Cd (mg/L)Cl (mg/L)
CO3
(mg/L)Cr (mg/L)
Cu
(mg/L)F (mg/L)
Gross
Alpha
(pCi/L)
Calculated
Adjusted
Gross Alpha
(pCi/L)
HCO3
(mg/L)Hg (mg/L)
K
(mg/L)
Mg
(mg/L)
Mo
(mg/L)
Na
(mg/L)
NH3 as N
(mg/L)
NO3+NO2
as N
(mg/L)Pb (mg/L)
Ra-226
(pCi/L)
Se
(mg/L)
SO4
(mg/L)
TDS
(mg/L)
Unat
(mg/L)
Zn
(mg/L)
4/26/03 <0.005 0.03 0.2 <0.001 14.6 <0.01 <0.01 0.7 <0.001 <0.005 <0.1 2.1 0.003 <0.005 60.2 328 0.0263 0.04
11/30/03 <0.005 0.031 0.2 <0.001 16.1 <0.01 <0.01 0.6 <0.001 <0.005 <0.1 2.1 <0.002 <0.005 60.5 383 0.0272 0.2
3/23/04 <0.005 0.029 0.2 12.1 <0.001 16 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.6 246 <0.001 2.6 8.9 <0.005 110 <0.1 2.15 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 56.1 354 0.0249 <0.01
9/21/04 <0.005 0.023 0.2 12 <0.001 16 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.7 237 <0.001 2.1 8.6 <0.005 99.9 <0.1 1.91 <0.002 0.5 <0.005 65 358 0.0225 0.01
11/7/04 <0.005 0.022 0.2 13 <0.001 16 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.8 260 <0.001 2.8 9.4 <0.005 113 <0.1 2.1 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 65 348 0.0245 <0.01
3/21/05 <0.005 0.021 0.1 12.4 <0.001 17 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.7 246 <0.001 2.4 9 <0.005 104 <0.1 2 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 60 364 0.0236 <0.01
6/12/05 <0.005 0.025 0.1 11.9 <0.001 17 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.5 236 <0.001 1.9 8.8 <0.005 107 <0.1 2.2 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 58 342 0.0235 <0.01
9/11/05 <0.005 0.02 0.2 12 <0.001 19 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.6 246 <0.001 2.2 8.9 <0.005 107 <0.1 2.2 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 65 318 0.0253 <0.01
12/13/05 <0.005 0.026 0.1 11.3 <0.001 24 3 <0.01 <0.01 0.7 230 <0.001 2.6 8.4 <0.005 107 <0.1 2.1 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 66 376 0.0231 <0.01
3/11/06 <0.005 0.027 0.2 14 <0.001 30 3 <0.01 <0.01 0.7 232 <0.001 2.8 10.1 <0.005 111 <0.1 2.1 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 69 352 0.0232 <0.01
6/11/06 <0.005 0.025 0.2 11.7 <0.001 34 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.6 215 <0.001 2.9 9.2 <0.005 116 <0.1 2.1 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 67 352 0.0242 <0.01
9/20/06 <0.005 0.028 0.2 14.3 <0.001 39 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.6 227 <0.001 2.8 10.6 <0.005 119 <0.1 2.2 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 65 370 0.0263 <0.01
12/8/06 <0.005 0.025 0.2 13.6 <0.001 39 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.8 227 <0.001 2.9 10.3 <0.005 116 <0.1 2.1 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 63 376 0.0257 <0.01
3/11/07 <0.005 0.025 0.2 13.9 <0.001 35 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.7 11.9 <3 237 <0.001 3.1 10.6 <0.005 117 <0.1 2.2 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 59 360 0.0251 <0.01
6/24/07 <0.005 0.025 0.2 14.5 <0.001 42 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.7 13.4 <3 237 <0.001 2.8 10.8 <0.005 117 <0.1 2.4 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 66 374 0.025 <0.01
9/1/07 <0.005 0.026 0.2 13.2 <0.001 43 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.7 14.2 <3 238 <0.001 3.1 9.7 <0.005 120 <0.1 2.3 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 69 372 0.024 <0.01
12/4/07 <0.005 0.026 <0.1 13.9 <0.001 44 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.6 17.2 <3 235 <0.001 2.9 9.7 <0.005 121 <0.1 2.5 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 67 380 0.0259 <0.01
3/26/08 <0.005 0.025 0.2-J 14.2 <0.001 44 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.6 246 <0.001 3 10.8 <0.005 121 <0.1 2.2 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 70 384-J 0.0245 <0.01
6/30/08 <0.005-J 0.024 0.2-J 15 <0.001 43 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.7 28.1 11.11 242 <0.001 3 11 <0.005 124 <0.1 1.16-J <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 72 360 0.0251-J <0.01
9/24/08 <0.005 0.019 0.2 15.6 <0.001 45 1 <0.01 <0.01 0.6 233 <0.001 2.9 11.2 <0.005 128 <0.1 2.3-J <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 70 401 0.0251 <0.01
12/15/08 <0.005 0.024-J 0.2 15.7 <0.001 47 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.6 233 <0.001 3 11 <0.005 126 <0.1 2.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 69 410-J 0.0229 <0.01
2/9/09 <0.005 0.024 0.2 14-J <0.001 39 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.7 236 <0.001 2 10-J <0.005 118-J <0.1 2.3 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 74 404 0.024 <0.01
4/13/09 <0.005 0.024 0.2 14 <0.001 46 2 <0.01 <0.01 0.7 238 <0.001 3-J 10 <0.005 118-J <0.1 2.2 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 69 405 0.0232 <0.01
8/24/09 <0.005 0.019 0.2 26 <0.001 41 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.6 228-J <0.001 3 17 <0.005 112 <0.1 2.2 <0.002 0.38 0.013-J 144 444 0.0225 <0.01
10/18/09 <0.005 0.02 0.2 19 <0.001 48 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.6 242-J <0.001 3 13 <0.005 118 <0.1 2.2 <0.002 <0.2 0.008 103 436 0.0232 <0.01
2/1/10 <0.005-R 0.024-R 0.2-R 18-R <0.001-R 42-R <2-R <0.01-R <0.01-R 0.6-R 254-R <0.001-R 3-R 12-R <0.005-R 130-R <0.1-R 2.2-R <0.002-R <0.2 0.006-R 91-R 342-R 0.0264-R <0.01-R
3/22/10 <0.005 0.023 0.2 20 <0.001 43 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.6 245-J <0.001 3 14 <0.005 116 <0.1 2.1 <0.002 0.01 116 452 0.0246 <0.01
4/12/10 <0.005 0.02 0.1 21 <0.001 41 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.6 250-R <0.001 3 14 <0.005 145 <0.1 2.2 <0.002 0.22 0.01 114 424 0.0234 <0.01
8/30/10 <0.005 0.018 0.14 25 <0.001 38 <20-J <0.01 <0.01 0.57 9.5 <3 180-J <0.001 4.5 18 <0.005 100 <0.1 1.9 <0.002 <0.2-R 0.015 140 460 0.022 0.018
10/18/10 <0.005 0.018 0.14 26 <0.001 37 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.53 16.7 3.16 180 <0.001 4.5 17 <0.005 110 1.8 <0.002 <0.2 0.014 150 450 0.02 <0.01
1/24/11 <0.005 0.016 0.11 22 <0.001 39 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.59 10.2 <3 180 <0.001 4.1 15 <0.005 110 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 <0.2 0.011 120 440 0.02 <0.01
4/11/11 <0.005 0.014 0.11 23 <0.001 32 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.49 7.4 <3 170 <0.001 4 17 <0.005 98 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 <0.2 0.015 140 460 0.019 <0.01
7/25/11 <0.005 0.011 <0.1 28 <0.001 28 <4 <0.01 <0.01 0.36 6.5 <3 150 <0.001 4.6 21 <0.005 90 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 <0.2 0.016 160 450 0.017 <0.01
10/17/11 <0.005 0.014 <0.1 29 <0.001 29 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.4 7.7 <3 160 <0.001 4.3 21 <0.005 83 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 <0.2 0.019 150 430 0.018 <0.01
2/13/12 <0.005 0.014 <0.1 28 <0.001 29 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.42 9.9 <3 160 <0.001 4.2 19 <0.005 76 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 <0.2 0.014 140 420 0.016 <0.01
4/30/12 <0.005 0.013 <0.1 28 <0.001 26 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.39 14.9 4.75 150 <0.001 3.9 19 <0.005 77 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.22-J 0.014 130 410 0.015 <0.01
7/23/12 <0.005 0.012 <0.1 31 <0.001 26 <4 <0.01 <0.01 0.43 7.1 <3 150 <0.001 3.7 20 <0.005 75 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.2 0.014 130 390 0.014 <0.01
10/1/12 <0.005 0.014 <0.1 27 <0.001 30 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.43 6.8 <3 150 <0.001 3.7 18 <0.005 78 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.21 0.014 130 410 0.014 <0.01
2/19/13 <0.005 0.013 <0.1 30 <0.001 25 <8 <0.01 <0.01 0.43 14.2 4.72 150 <0.001 3.8 20 <0.005 72 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.2 0.014 130 390 0.014 <0.01
5/13/13 <0.005 0.011 <0.1 29 <0.001 30 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.52 10.2 <3 140 <0.001 4 18 <0.005 67 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 <0.2 0.0074 130 390 0.013 <0.01
7/15/13 <0.005 0.012 0.11 27 <0.001 31 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.45 13.2 3.72 150 <0.001 4.1 18 <0.005 80 <0.1 1.9 <0.002 0.23 0.011 110 400 0.014 <0.01
11/4/13 <0.005 0.017 0.1 25 <0.001 33 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.44 10.1 <3 150 <0.001 3.4 17 <0.005 81 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.21 0.0074 110 390 0.014 <0.01
2/24/14 <0.005 0.016 0.11 27 <0.001 38 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.45 8.8 <3 150 <0.001 3.3 17 <0.005 91 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 <0.2 0.008 120 390 0.014 0.02
4/28/14 <0.005 0.016 <0.1 26 <0.001 34 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.41 11.4 <3 150 <0.001 3.9 18 <0.005 84 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.22 0.0059 110 400 0.014 0.022
7/22/14 <0.005 0.017 <0.1 26 <0.001 30 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.38 11.2 <3 150 <0.001 3.9 18 <0.005 74 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 <0.2 0.009 110 390 0.015 0.017
10/27/14 <0.005 0.016 <0.1 27 <0.001 29 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.36 9.1 <3 150 <0.001 3.9 17 <0.005 77 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 <0.2 0.008 110 370 0.015 <0.01
2/23/15 <0.005 0.014-R <0.1 26 <0.001 28 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.35 8.6 <3 140 <0.001 3.4 17 <0.005 76 0.22 1.6 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 110 370 0.013 <0.01
2/23/15 0.015
5/11/15 <0.005 0.016 <0.1 25 <0.001 34 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.41 9.2 <3 150 <0.001 3.9 17 <0.005 81 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.224 0.0083 110 390 0.015 <0.01
8/10/15 <0.005 0.016 <0.1 26 <0.001 34 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.43 10 <3 150 <0.001 3.9 17 <0.005 77 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 <0.2 0.005 110 380 0.014 <0.01
10/19/15 <0.005 0.014 <0.1 26 <0.001 32 <8 <0.01 <0.01 0.4 10 <3 140 <0.001 3 16 <0.005 78 0.34 1.7 <0.002 0.23 0.0064 110 360 0.0014 <0.01
3/7/16 <0.005 0.017 <0.1 27 <0.001 30 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.39 12.7 3.18 150 <0.001 3.7 17 <0.005 72 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.217 0.0092 100 330 0.014 0.011
4/29/16 <0.005 0.016 <0.1 25 <0.001 34 <8 <0.01 <0.01 0.4 13.4 3.2 150 <0.001 3.9 17 <0.005 80 0.19 1.7 <0.002 <0.2 0.0072 110 400 0.015 <0.01
8/4/16 <0.005 0.015 <0.1 27 <0.001 28 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.5-R 8.2 <3 140 <0.001 4 17 <0.005 66 <0.1-R 1.7 <0.002 <0.2 0.006 99 360 0.013 0.063
8/4/16 0.39
9/27/16 <0.1
10/18/16 <0.005 0.014 <0.1 23 <0.001 28 4 <0.01 <0.01 0.4 10.1 <3 144 <0.001 3 16 <0.005 71 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.6 0.006 91 370 0.0119 <0.01
2/14/17 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.7 4.4 152 <0.001 3 23 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 21 200 0.002 <0.01
5/2/17 <0.005 0.012 <0.1 23 <0.001 29 2 <0.01 <0.01 0.4 8.3 <3 145 <0.001 3 15 <0.005 71 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 <0.2 0.005 91 360 0.0105 <0.01
7/18/17 <0.005 0.014 <0.1 25 <0.001 26 4 <0.01 <0.01 0.4 9.1 <3 142 <0.001 3 16 <0.005 64 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.4 0.006 89 360 0.0117 <0.01
10/31/17 <0.005 0.013 <0.1 23 <0.001 33 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.4 9.4 <3 153 <0.001 3 15 <0.005 77 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 98 390 0.0112 <0.01
2/20/18 <0.005 0.01 <0.1 24 <0.001 30 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.4 9.5 3.8 145 <0.001 3 15 <0.005 74 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.2 <0.005 95 360 0.0085 <0.01
RM8
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Date Ag (mg/L)As (mg/L)
Ba
(mg/L)
Ca
(mg/L)Cd (mg/L)Cl (mg/L)
CO3
(mg/L)Cr (mg/L)
Cu
(mg/L)F (mg/L)
Gross
Alpha
(pCi/L)
Calculated
Adjusted
Gross Alpha
(pCi/L)
HCO3
(mg/L)Hg (mg/L)
K
(mg/L)
Mg
(mg/L)
Mo
(mg/L)
Na
(mg/L)
NH3 as N
(mg/L)
NO3+NO2
as N
(mg/L)Pb (mg/L)
Ra-226
(pCi/L)
Se
(mg/L)
SO4
(mg/L)
TDS
(mg/L)
Unat
(mg/L)
Zn
(mg/L)
4/23/18 <0.005 0.013 <0.1 24 <0.001 32 3 <0.01 <0.01 0.4 145 <0.001 3 15 <0.005 76 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 94 360 0.0111 <0.01
7/9/18 <0.005 0.013 <0.1 22 <0.001 20 3 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 7.2 <3 136 <0.001 3 15 <0.005 53 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.2-J 0.005 71 300 0.0149 <0.01
10/9/18 <0.005 0.013 <0.1 18 <0.001 30 4 <0.01 <0.01 0.4 9.6 2.3 149 <0.001 3 15 <0.005 78 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 98 360 0.0109 <0.01
1/26/19 <0.005 0.012 <0.1 22 <0.001 20 3 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 8 <2 138 <0.001 3 14 <0.005 51 <0.1 1.2 <0.002 2 <0.005 69 310 0.0096 <0.01
4/28/19 <0.005 0.012 <0.1 24 <0.001 34 3 <0.01 <0.01 0.4 8.5 <3 145 <0.001 4 15 <0.005 85 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.2 <0.005 87 390 0.0104 <0.01
7/28/19 <0.01 0.012 <0.1 23 <0.001 35 5 <0.01 <0.01 0.4 8.1 <4 141 <0.0002 3 17 <0.01 76 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.4 <0.01 92 370 0.0105 <0.01
11/3/19 <0.005-J 0.015-J <0.1-J 23-J <0.001-J 35-J <2-J <0.01-J <0.01-J 0.4-J 9.2-J <2-J 151-J <0.0002-J 3-J 15-J <0.005-J 79-J <0.1-J 1.6-J <0.002-J 0.2-J <0.005-J 100-J 350-J 0.0136-J <0.01-J
2/16/20 <0.005 0.013 <0.1 24 <0.001 37 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.4 11.9 4.4 149 <0.0002 4 15 <0.005 85 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 0.5 <0.005 95 420 0.0111 <0.01
5/24/20 <0.005 0.015 <0.1 24 <0.001 39 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.4 12.9 4.6 146 <0.0002 4 16 <0.005 85 0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.6 <0.005 95 400 0.0122 <0.01
7/7/20 <0.005 0.019 <0.1 24 <0.001 35 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.4 13.4 3.1 145 <0.0002 3 16 <0.005 83 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.2 0.005 101 380 0.0152 <0.01
10/5/20 <0.005 0.015 <0.1 25 <0.001 44 2 <0.01 <0.01 0.5 13.2 4.3 150 <0.0002 5 16 <0.005 95 <0.1 1.9 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 109 430 0.0131 <0.01
1/22/21 <0.005 0.017 <0.1 23 <0.001 46 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.4 10.5 <2 151 <0.0002 4 16 <0.005 96 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.2 0.005 118 420 0.0142 <0.01
4/1/21 <0.005 0.014 <0.1 24 <0.001 46 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.4 8.9 <2 150 <0.0002 4 17 <0.005 92 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 122 430 0.013 <0.01
7/9/21 <0.005 0.019 <0.1 25 <0.001 48 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.4 10.7 <2 149 <0.0002 4 17 <0.005 114 <0.1 1.9 <0.002 <0.2 0.006 118 460 0.0161 <0.01
10/3/21 <0.005 0.016 0.1 24 <0.001 39 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.4 10.2 <2 151 <0.0002 3 16 <0.005 84 <0.1 2.1 <0.002 0.6 0.005 100 390 0.0144 <0.01
2/5/22 <0.005 0.015 <0.1 27 <0.001 49 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.4 10.1 <2 161 <0.0002 4 17 <0.005 103 <0.1 1.9 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 116 450 0.0132 <0.01
4/2/22 <0.005 0.018 <0.1 24 <0.001 60 4 <0.01 <0.01 0.5 10.7 <2 167 <0.0002 4 18 <0.005 118 <0.1 2.2 <0.002 0.2 0.006 138 490 0.0165 <0.01
2/5/22 <0.005 0.015 <0.1 27 <0.001 49 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.4 10.1 <2 161 <0.0002 4 17 <0.005 103 <0.1 1.9 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 116 450 0.0132 <0.01
4/2/22 <0.005 0.018 <0.1 24 <0.001 60 4 <0.01 <0.01 0.5 10.7 <2 167 <0.0002 4 18 <0.005 118 <0.1 2.2 <0.002 0.2 0.006 138 490 0.0165 <0.01
2/5/22 <0.005 0.015 <0.1 27 <0.001 49 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.4 10.1 <2 161 <0.0002 4 17 <0.005 103 <0.1 1.9 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 116 450 0.0132 <0.01
4/2/22 <0.005 0.018 <0.1 24 <0.001 60 4 <0.01 <0.01 0.5 10.7 <2 167 <0.0002 4 18 <0.005 118 <0.1 2.2 <0.002 0.2 0.006 138 490 0.0165 <0.01
7/9/22 <0.005 0.015 <0.1 27 <0.001 54 <2-J <0.01 <0.01 0.4 12.4-J 3.3-J 160 <0.0002 4 18 <0.005 112 <0.1 2 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 128 550 0.0135 <0.01
10/15/22 <0.005 0.018 0.1 28 <0.001 60 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.5 22.8 12.8 157 <0.0002 4 20 <0.005 140 <0.1 2.4 <0.002 1.5 0.005 163 580 0.0147 <0.01
3/11/23 <0.005 0.023 <0.1 28 <0.001 57 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.5 19.3 7.1 163 <0.0002 4 19 <0.005 127 <0.1 2.3 <0.002 0.4 0.006 136 530 0.018 <0.01
4/22/23 <0.005 0.018 <0.1 26 <0.001 54 6 <0.01 <0.01 0.5 17.5 7.5 160 <0.0002 4 18 <0.005 121 <0.1 2.3 <0.002 0.2 0.005 132 490 0.0147 <0.01
RM14
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Date Ag (mg/L)As (mg/L)
Ba
(mg/L)
Ca
(mg/L)Cd (mg/L)
Cl
(mg/L)
CO3
(mg/L)
Cr
(mg/L)
Cu
(mg/L)F (mg/L)
Gross
Alpha
(pCi/L)
Calculated
Adjusted
Gross
Alpha
(pCi/L)
HCO3
(mg/L)Hg (mg/L)
K
(mg/L)
Mg
(mg/L)
Mo
(mg/L)
Na
(mg/L)
NH3 as N
(mg/L)
NO3+NO2 as N
(mg/L)Pb (mg/L)
Ra-226
(pCi/L)Se (mg/L)
SO4
(mg/L)
TDS
(mg/L)
Unat
(mg/L)
Zn
(mg/L)
4/20/03 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 <0.001 6.2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 <0.001 <0.005 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 <0.005 29.8 182 0.004 <0.01
11/30/03 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 <0.001 7.7 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 <0.001 <0.005 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 <0.005 28.2 228 0.0043 <0.01
3/23/04 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20.5 <0.001 8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 186 <0.001 2.5 27.5 <0.005 18.3 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 32.4 220 0.0039 <0.01
9/20/04 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 25 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 194 <0.001 3.5 25.8 <0.005 20.4 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 29 224 0.0037 0.01
11/28/04 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20.8 <0.001 9 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 182 <0.001 2.7 26.9 <0.005 21.6 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 27 245 0.0037 <0.01
3/20/05 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20.8 <0.001 8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 187 <0.001 2.5 26 <0.005 20.7 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 28 220 0.0037 <0.01
6/13/05 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20.8 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.1 180 <0.001 2.1 25.9 <0.005 21.4 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 28 192 0.004 <0.01
9/12/05 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20.5 <0.001 8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 192 <0.001 2.3 25.7 <0.005 21.2 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 28 190 0.004 <0.01
12/13/05 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18.2 <0.001-J 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 186 <0.001 2.6 23.4 <0.005 21.1 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 29 227 0.0043 0.04
3/11/06 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20.8 <0.001 7 2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 185 <0.001 2.7 26 <0.005 20.7 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 28 190 0.0036 <0.01
6/12/06 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 18.2 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 176 <0.001 2.9 24 <0.005 18.2 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.5 <0.005 33 190 0.0041 <0.01
9/19/06 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21.2 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 184 <0.001 2.7 26.5 <0.005 21.8 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 29 194 0.0043 <0.01
12/9/06 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20.1 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 181 <0.001 2.8 25.7 <0.005 21.3 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 27 210 0.0041 <0.01
3/11/07 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21.2 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 7.6 4.82 184 <0.001 3 27.5 <0.005 22.1 <0.1 1.9 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 28 190 0.0041 <0.01
6/24/07 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20.3 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.5 <3 188 <0.001 2.9 25.9 <0.005 20.7 <0.1 1.9 <0.002 0.5 <0.005 29 200 0.0041 <0.01
9/2/07 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19.6 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 5.5 <3 189 <0.001 3 24.9 <0.005 20.4 <0.1 1.9 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 29 196 0.0039 <0.01
12/3/07 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 18.5 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 8.5 5.66 182 <0.001 2.7 23.6 <0.005 19.1 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 30 198 0.0042 <0.01
3/25/08 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20.4 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 185 <0.001 2.8 26.7 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 0.028 <0.005 31 169-J 0.0039 <0.01
6/29/08 <0.005-J <0.003 0.1 22 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6.7 4.06 187 <0.001 3 27 <0.005 21 <0.1 1.73-J <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 30 182 0.0039-J <0.01
9/23/08 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20.9 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 181 <0.001 2.7 26.7 <0.005 20 <0.1 5.75-R <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 30 212 0.004 <0.01
12/16/08 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 21 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 183 <0.001 2.9 26.3 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.88-J <0.002 0.31-J <0.005 27 210 0.0038 <0.01
2/8/09 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18-J <0.001 4 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 183 <0.001 2 22-J <0.005 20-J <0.1 1.8 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 29 180 0.0038 <0.01
4/12/09 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 189 <0.001 3-J 23 <0.005 20-J <0.1 1.7 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 27 211 0.0038 <0.01
8/24/09 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 192-J <0.001 3 23 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 0.36 <0.005 30 206 0.0038 <0.01
10/19/09 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 195-J <0.001 3 23 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 27 202 0.0038 <0.01
2/1/10 <0.005-R <0.003-R <0.1-R 19-R <0.001-R 7-R <2-R <0.01-R <0.01-R 0.2-R 200-R <0.001-R 3-R 23-R <0.005-R 21-R 0.1-R 1.8-R <0.002-R <0.2 <0.005-R 27-R 125-R 0.0039-R <0.01-R
3/22/10 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 9 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 199-J <0.001 3 23 <0.005 21 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 <0.005 26 216 0.0039 <0.01
4/12/10 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 21 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 203-R <0.001 4 25 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 28 199 0.004 <0.01
8/30/10 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 7.2 <20-J <0.01 <0.01 0.21 3.7 <3 160-J <0.001 3 24 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.4-J <0.005 27 210 0.004 0.01
10/19/10 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 7.3 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 7.5 5.06 150 <0.001 2.9 24 <0.005 20 1.8 <0.002 0.25 <0.005 26 220 0.0036 <0.01
1/24/11 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 7.6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4.1 <3 150 <0.001 2.7 24 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 0.26 <0.005 26 220 0.0036 <0.01
4/11/11 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 7.2 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4 <3 150 <0.001 2.5 24 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.9 <0.002 0.24 <0.005 26 220 0.0041 <0.01
7/25/11 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 7.5 <4 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4.2 <3 150 <0.001 2.9 25 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.27 <0.005 25 220 0.0041 <0.01
10/17/11 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 7.4 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 5.7 3.06 150 <0.001 2.6 25 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 0.23 <0.005 26 210 0.0039 <0.01
2/13/12 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 7.6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 3.3 <3 150 <0.001 2.6 23 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 0.26 <0.005 26 210 0.0036 <0.01
4/30/12 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 7.3 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 6.4 3.96 150 <0.001 2.8 24 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 0.24 <0.005 25 210 0.0036 <0.01
7/23/12 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 7.9 <4 <0.01 <0.01 0.21 4.3 <3 160 <0.001 2.6 24 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 26 200 0.0035 <0.01
10/1/12 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 7.9 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 3.2 <3 150 <0.001 2.7 24 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.23 <0.005 26 220 0.0034 0.01
2/19/13 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 7.4 <8 <0.01 <0.01 0.22 4.2 <3 150 <0.001 2.9 26 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 0.33 0.0068 27 210 0.0035 <0.01
5/13/13 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 18 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.48 4.4 <3 150 <0.001 3 24 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.9 <0.002 0.29 <0.005 58 220 0.0035 <0.01
7/15/13 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 7.8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4.9 <3 150 <0.001 2.9 25 <0.005 19 <0.1 2 <0.002 0.33 <0.005 26 220 0.0036 <0.01
11/4/13 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4.9 <3 150 <0.001 2.4 23 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 0.38 <0.005 27 210 0.0036 <0.01
2/24/14 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 5.2 <3 150 <0.001 2.7 24 <0.005 20 0.12 1.9 <0.002 0.28 <0.005 28 210 0.0035 <0.01
4/29/14 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20 <0.001 8.2 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4.5 <3 150 <0.001 3 25 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 27 220 0.0038 <0.01
4/29/14 0.012
4/29/14 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20 <0.001 8.2 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 5.4 <3 150 <0.001 3 25 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 0.24 <0.005 27 210 0.0038 0.02-R
4/29/14 <0.01
4/29/14 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 8.1 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 5.7 3.25 150 <0.001 2.9 25 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 27 210 0.0036 <0.01-R
4/29/14 <0.01
7/22/14 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 5.8 3.01 150 <0.001 2.9 25 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 0.26 <0.005 27 210 0.0041 <0.01
10/27/14 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 7.7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 5.7 3.25 150 <0.001 2.8 23 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 0.27 <0.005 26 210 0.0036 0.01
2/23/15 <0.005 <0.003-R <0.1 19 <0.001 7.9 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 6 3.48 150 <0.001 2.5 24 <0.005 18 0.2 1.8 <0.002 0.32 <0.005 26 210 0.0037 <0.01
2/23/15 <0.003
5/11/15 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 7.8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 <3 <3 150 <0.001 2.9 25 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 0.32 <0.005 27 210 0.0039 <0.01
8/10/15 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 7.8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 6 3.35 150 <0.001 2.9 24 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.9 <0.002 0.24 <0.005 27 220 0.0039 <0.01
10/19/15 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 8.3 <8 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 6.5 4.05 170 <0.001 2.7 22 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 28 190 0.0036 <0.01
3/7/16 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 7.8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 5.7 3.05 150 <0.001 2.8 24 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 0.261 <0.005 27 160 0.0039 <0.01
4/29/16 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 8 <8 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 6.4 3.68 150 <0.001 2.8 24 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 0.24 <0.005 27 220 0.004 <0.01
8/4/16 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 8.1 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4.6 <3 160 <0.001 3.1 24 <0.005 19 <0.1-R 1.9 <0.002 0.25 <0.005 27 200 0.0037 <0.01
9/27/16 <0.1
10/18/16 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 17 <0.001 7 5 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.1 <3 147 <0.001 3 24 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.2 <0.005 24 220 0.0031 <0.01
2/14/17 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.4 3.4 153 <0.001 3 25 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.9 <0.002 1 <0.005 24 210 0.003 <0.01
RM14
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Date Ag (mg/L)As (mg/L)
Ba
(mg/L)
Ca
(mg/L)Cd (mg/L)
Cl
(mg/L)
CO3
(mg/L)
Cr
(mg/L)
Cu
(mg/L)F (mg/L)
Gross
Alpha
(pCi/L)
Calculated
Adjusted
Gross
Alpha
(pCi/L)
HCO3
(mg/L)Hg (mg/L)
K
(mg/L)
Mg
(mg/L)
Mo
(mg/L)
Na
(mg/L)
NH3 as N
(mg/L)
NO3+NO2 as N
(mg/L)Pb (mg/L)
Ra-226
(pCi/L)Se (mg/L)
SO4
(mg/L)
TDS
(mg/L)
Unat
(mg/L)
Zn
(mg/L)
5/2/17 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 8 3-J <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6.1 4.2 160 <0.001 3 23 <0.005 21 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 25 220 0.0028 <0.01
7/17/17 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 7 3 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6.1 4 148 <0.001 3 23 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 25 230 0.0032 <0.01
10/31/17 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 17 <0.001 8 4 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.5 3.1 152 <0.001 3 22 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.2 <0.005 26 220 0.0035 <0.01
2/19/18 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 8 4 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.5 3.8 145 <0.001 3 22 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 24 0.0025 <0.01
4/23/18 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 8 5 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6.5 4.6 147 <0.001 3 22 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.6 <0.005 26 200 0.0027 <0.01
7/9/18 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 7 4 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6.3 4.2 148 <0.001 3 23 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 1-J <0.005 24 210 0.0031 <0.01
10/9/18 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 8 3 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.9 3.8 154 <0.001 3 23 <0.005 24 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 27 210 0.003 <0.01
1/26/19 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 8 4 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5 3.8 151 <0.001 3 22 <0.005 23 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 25 230 0.0028 <0.01
4/28/19 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 7 5 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6.6 4.4 156 <0.001 3 23 <0.005 21 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 24 220 0.0032 <0.01
7/28/19 <0.01 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 8 7 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6 <4 146 <0.0002 3 25 <0.01 19 <0.1 <0.1 <0.002 0.3 <0.01 25 220 0.0032 <0.01
11/3/19 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 17 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 2.7 <2 155 <0.0002 3 22 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 25 230 0.0036 <0.01
2/16/20 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 8 2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6.9 5 152 <0.0002 3 22 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.2 <0.005 25 220 0.0029 <0.01
5/24/20 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.3 3.3 151 <0.0002 3 24 <0.005 21 0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 24 230 0.003 <0.01
7/7/20 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20 <0.001 8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6.6 3.7 155 <0.0002 2 25 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 26 230 0.0044 <0.01
10/5/20 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 9 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.7 2.6 153 <0.0002 4 23 <0.005 21 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 25 220 0.0032 <0.01
1/22/21 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4 <2 152 <0.0002 3 23 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 25 210 0.0032 <0.01
4/1/21 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.2 3.2 154 <0.0002 3 25 <0.005 21 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.6 <0.005 25 210 0.003 <0.01
7/9/21 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 8 3 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.2 <2 149 <0.0002 3 23 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 25 230 0.0036 <0.01
10/3/21 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 3.9 <2 158 <0.0002 3 23 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 0.8 <0.005 27 210 0.0037 <0.01
2/5/22 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 8 5 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.9 2.4 156 <0.0002 3 24 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 24 210 0.0036 <0.01
4/2/22 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 8 3 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.2 <2 158 <0.0002 3 24 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 0.2 <0.005 24 210 0.0038 <0.01
7/9/22 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 8 4-J <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.9-J 3.8-J 158 <0.0002 3 24 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 24 290 0.0031 <0.01
10/15/22 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 8 3 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 7.4 5 152 <0.0002 3 26 <0.005 23 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 0.6 <0.005 25 260 0.0036 <0.01
3/11/23 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 7 4 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.4 3 150 <0.0002 2 25 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.8 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 22 220 0.0036 <0.01
4/22/23 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 7 7 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6 3.8 145 <0.0002 3 24 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.9 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 23 200 0.0032 <0.01
RM12
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Date Ag (mg/L)As (mg/L)
Ba
(mg/L)
Ca
(mg/L)Cd (mg/L)
Cl
(mg/L)
CO3
(mg/L)
Cr
(mg/L)Cu (mg/L)F (mg/L)
Gross
Alpha
(pCi/L)
Calculated
Adjusted
Gross Alpha
(pCi/L)
HCO3
(mg/L)Hg (mg/L)K (mg/L)
Mg
(mg/L)
Mo
(mg/L)
Na
(mg/L)
NH3 as N
(mg/L)
NO3+NO2
as N
(mg/L)
Pb
(mg/L)
Ra-226
(pCi/L)
Se
(mg/L)
SO4
(mg/L)
TDS
(mg/L)
Unat
(mg/L)
Zn
(mg/L)
4/21/03 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 <0.001 15.9 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 <0.001 <0.005 <0.1 0.9 <0.002 <0.005 45.8 224 0.0077 <0.01
12/1/03 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 <0.001 16.1 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 <0.001 <0.005 <0.1 0.07 <0.002 <0.005 44.8 277 0.0088 0.22
3/22/04 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 26.1 <0.001 16 <2 <0.01 0.07 0.2 207 <0.001 2.9 33 <0.005 25.8 <0.1 0.82 <0.002 0.5 <0.005 42.9-J 272 0.0078 0.06
9/20/04 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 24.7 <0.001 16 <2 <0.01 0.04 0.2 202 0.001 3.8 31.5 <0.005 23.6 <0.1 1.15 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 43 266 0.0069 0.04
11/29/04 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 24.8 <0.001 17 <2 <0.01 0.03 0.2 200 <0.001 2.9 33.4 <0.005 25 <0.1 1.1 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 42 255 0.0072 0.02
3/21/05 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 24.5 <0.001 16 <2 <0.01 0.01 0.2 210 <0.001 2.6 32.9 <0.005 23.8 <0.1 1.1 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 41 267 0.0071 0.01
6/13/05 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 24.9 <0.001 16 <2 <0.01 0.01 0.1 198 <0.001 2.2 32 <0.005 24.7 <0.1 1.2 <0.002 0.2 <0.005 41 246 0.0073 0.02
9/12/05 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 24.5 <0.001 16 <2 <0.01 0.01 0.2 209 <0.001 2.4 31.9 <0.005 24.5 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 43 282 0.0074 0.01
12/14/05 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 22.3 <0.001 16 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 198 <0.001 2.6 30.6 <0.005 24.9 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 43 260 0.0067 0.01
3/12/06 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 25.3 <0.001 17 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 201 <0.001 2.9 32.9 <0.005 24.4 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.5 <0.005 44 226 0.0072 0.01
6/12/06 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 22.3 <0.001 17 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 188 <0.001 3 30.1 <0.005 21.9 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 44 224 0.0072 0.01
9/18/06 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 25.2 <0.001 17 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 197 <0.001 2.7 32.6 <0.005 25.4 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 44 240 0.0075 0.01
12/9/06 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 24.5 <0.001 16 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 201 <0.001 2.9 32.9 <0.005 25.7 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 43 254 0.0074 <0.01
3/12/07 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 25.2 <0.001 18 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 7 <3 200 <0.001 3 33.5 <0.005 25.7 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 43 240 0.0071 0.01
6/25/07 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 25.3 <0.001 17 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 7.9 <3 207 <0.001 2.9 33.1 <0.005 23.8 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 45 234 0.0073 <0.01
9/1/07 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 23.3 <0.001 17 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 8.8 4.06 208 <0.001 3 30.2 <0.005 23.9 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 46 240 0.007 <0.01
12/4/07 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 22.6 <0.001 17 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 12.3 7.22 201 <0.001 2.8 29.1 <0.005 22.2 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 44 238 0.0075 0.01
3/26/08 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 25 <0.001 16 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 209 <0.001 2.9 33 <0.005 25.2 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 43 248-J 0.0071 <0.01
9/24/08 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 26.6 <0.001 16 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 201 <0.001 2.8 34.1 <0.005 23.3 <0.1 1.48-J <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 45 246 0.0072 0.02
12/15/08 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 24.9 <0.001 16 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 193 <0.001 2.9 32 <0.005 24 <0.1 1.76 <0.002 <0.2-J <0.005 43 261 0.0063 <0.01
2/8/09 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 21-J <0.001 14 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 195 <0.001 2 27-J <0.005 23-J <0.1 1.5 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 41 241 0.0064 0.01
4/14/09 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 22 <0.001 15 4 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 193 <0.001 3 28 <0.005 24 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.26 <0.005 43 234 0.0068 <0.01
8/25/09 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 22 <0.001 17 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 200 <0.001 3 28 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.77 <0.005 45 237 0.0066 <0.01
10/19/09 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 22 <0.001 14 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 202-J <0.001 3 27 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 43 241 0.0064 <0.01
2/1/10 <0.005-R <0.003-R <0.1-R 22-R <0.001-R 14-R <2-R <0.01-R <0.01-R 0.2-R 211-R <0.001-R 3-R 28-R <0.005-R 26-R <0.1-R 1.6-R <0.002-R <0.2-R <0.005-R 42-R 172-R 0.0064-R <0.01-R
3/22/10 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 23 <0.001 16 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 211-J <0.001 3 29 <0.005 24 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 <0.005 42 249 0.0065 <0.01
4/12/10 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 23 <0.001 17 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 216-R <0.001 3 30 <0.005 25 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.23 <0.005 43 252 0.0062 <0.01
8/30/10 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 22 <0.001 16 <20-J <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 7.5 3.30 160-J <0.001 2.9 29 <0.005 23 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 <0.08-R <0.005 39 240 0.0062 <0.01
10/19/10 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 23 <0.001 18 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 5.2 <3 150 <0.001 2.9 29 <0.005 24 1.7 <0.002 0.25 <0.005 43 240 0.006 <0.01
1/24/11 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 22 <0.001 18 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 7.7 3.57 160 <0.001 2.7 29 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.21 <0.005 42 240 0.0061 <0.01
4/11/11 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 22 <0.001 18 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 5.3 <3 160 <0.001 2.6 30 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.31 <0.005 42 270 0.0064 <0.01
7/25/11 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 23 <0.001 17 <4 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 7.2 <3 160 <0.001 2.9 31 <0.005 23 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.201 <0.005 39 270 0.0066 <0.01
10/17/11 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 22 <0.001 18 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 6.4 <3 160 <0.001 2.7 30 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.24 <0.005 43 260 0.0065 <0.01
2/13/12 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 22 <0.001 18 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 7.8 3.67 160 <0.001 3 29 <0.005 21 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.44 <0.005 42 250 0.0061 <0.01
4/30/12 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 22 <0.001 17 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 9.1 4.83 160 <0.001 2.6 29 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.25 0.0051 41 260 0.0063 <0.01
7/23/12 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 22 <0.001 17 <4 <0.01 <0.01 0.22 7.8 4.35 160 <0.001 2.8 28 <0.005 23 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.34 <0.005 45 230 0.0051 <0.01
10/1/12 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 22 <0.001 17 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4.7 <3 160 <0.001 2.7 29 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.2 <0.002 0.34 <0.005 43 260 0.0053 <0.01
2/19/13 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 25 <0.001 17 <8 <0.01 <0.01 0.22 7.1 3.04 160 <0.001 3.1 32 <0.005 24 <0.1 0.65 <0.002 0.34 <0.005 44 270 0.006 <0.01
5/13/13 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 24 <0.001 20 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.31 10.4 6.41 160 <0.001 3.2 30 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.1 <0.002 0.36 <0.005 45 270 0.0059 <0.01
7/15/13 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 22 <0.001 18 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 7.4 3.47 160 <0.001 2.9 30 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.34 <0.005 41 270 0.0058 <0.01
11/4/13 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 22 <0.001 18 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 9.7 5.84 170 <0.001 2.6 29 <0.005 23 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.42 <0.005 43 260 0.0057 <0.01
2/24/14 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 25 <0.001 18 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 9.5 5.22 170 <0.001 2.8 31 <0.005 24 <0.1 0.56 <0.002 0.21 <0.005 43 260 0.0063 <0.01
4/29/14 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 23 <0.001 18 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 9.8 5.52 160 <0.001 3 31 <0.005 23 <0.1 1.1 <0.002 0.31 <0.005 42 260 0.0063 <0.01
7/22/14 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 22 <0.001 18 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 11.3 6.54 160 <0.001 2.9 30 <0.005 23 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.28 <0.005 42 260 0.007 <0.01
10/27/14 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 23 <0.001 18 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 7.1 <3 160 <0.001 2.9 29 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.32 0.0059 42 270 0.0065 <0.01
2/23/15 <0.005 0.003-R <0.1 23 <0.001 18 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 8.8 4.65 160 <0.001 2.5 30 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.231 <0.005 42 250 0.0061 <0.01
2/23/15 <0.003
5/11/15 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 23 <0.001 19 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 6.4 <3 160 <0.001 3 31 <0.005 23 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.26 <0.005 43 250 0.0067 <0.01
8/10/15 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 23 <0.001 19 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4.1 <3 160 <0.001 3 30 <0.005 23 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.26 <0.005 43 270 0.0064 0.01
10/19/15 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 22 <0.001 19 <8 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 8.8 4.72 160 <0.001 2.7 28 <0.005 24 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.23 <0.005 44 230 0.006 <0.01
3/7/16 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 23 <0.001 19 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 8.8 4.45 160 <0.001 2.9 29 <0.005 23 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.273 <0.005 44 220 0.0064 0.015
4/29/16 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 22 <0.001 18 <8 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 7.6 3.32 160 <0.001 2.9 29 <0.005 23 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.209 0.0052 44 270 0.0063 <0.01
8/4/16 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 23 <0.001 17 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 8.8 4.72 160 <0.001 3.1 29 <0.005 23 <0.1-R 1.6 <0.002 0.25 <0.005 42 250 0.006 <0.01
9/27/16 <0.1
10/18/16 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 17 5 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 7 3.5 155 <0.001 3 28 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 37 260 0.0052 <0.01
2/14/17 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 22 <0.001 17 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 7.2 4.1 164 <0.001 3 30 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 37 250 0.0045 <0.01
5/2/17 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 21 <0.001 16 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 7.6 4.4 160 <0.001 3 27 <0.005 23 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 37 260 0.0047 <0.01
5/2/17 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 21 <0.001 16 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 7.6 4.4 160 <0.001 3 27 <0.005 23 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 37 260 0.0047 <0.01
7/17/17 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 21 <0.001 16 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 9 4.9 158 <0.001 3 28 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.5 <0.005 37 270 0.006 <0.01
10/30/17 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 17 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 7.7 4 161 <0.001 3 27 <0.005 23 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 39 260 0.0055 <0.01
2/20/18 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 21 <0.001 16 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 9.1 4.9 160 <0.001 3 27 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 1.4 <0.005 37 250 0.0062 <0.01
4/24/18 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 21 <0.001 16 5 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 8.7 5.2 155 <0.001 3 26 <0.005 25 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 1 <0.005 38 240 0.0052 <0.01
7/8/18 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 21 <0.001 16 4 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 8.8 4.8 157 <0.001 3 28 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 1.5-J <0.005 36 250 0.006 0.02
RM12
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Date Ag (mg/L)As (mg/L)
Ba
(mg/L)
Ca
(mg/L)Cd (mg/L)
Cl
(mg/L)
CO3
(mg/L)
Cr
(mg/L)Cu (mg/L)F (mg/L)
Gross
Alpha
(pCi/L)
Calculated
Adjusted
Gross Alpha
(pCi/L)
HCO3
(mg/L)Hg (mg/L)K (mg/L)
Mg
(mg/L)
Mo
(mg/L)
Na
(mg/L)
NH3 as N
(mg/L)
NO3+NO2
as N
(mg/L)
Pb
(mg/L)
Ra-226
(pCi/L)
Se
(mg/L)
SO4
(mg/L)
TDS
(mg/L)
Unat
(mg/L)
Zn
(mg/L)
10/9/18 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.8 3.3 150 <0.001 2 20 <0.005 24 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.6 <0.005 22 200 0.0022 <0.01
1/25/19 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 16 5 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 8 4.6 159 <0.001 3 27 <0.005 25 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 2.2 <0.005 36 270 0.005 <0.01
4/28/19 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 15 5 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 7.8 3.6 178 <0.001 3 27 <0.005 27 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 34 270 0.0062 0.01
7/28/19 <0.01 <0.003 <0.1 21 <0.001 16 6 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 7.2 3.5 155 <0.0002 3 29 <0.01 22 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.5 <0.01 37 260 0.0055 <0.01
11/3/19 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 16 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6.7 2.5 165 <0.0002 3 27 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 38 260 0.0061 0.01
2/16/20 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 21 <0.001 16 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 10.2 6.6 159 <0.0002 3 26 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.6 <0.005 37 260 0.0053 <0.01
5/24/20 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 22 <0.001 16 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6.2 2.6 168 <0.0002 3 29 <0.005 24 0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.6 <0.005 36 260 0.0053 0.01
7/7/20 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 21 <0.001 16 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 8 3.3 176 <0.0002 2 29 <0.005 24 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 35 260 0.007 <0.01
10/5/20 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 21 <0.001 17 3 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 7.6 3.8 157 <0.0002 4 29 <0.005 23 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.5 <0.005 37 250 0.0056 0.02
1/22/21 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 21 <0.001 16 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6.5 2.3 167 <0.0002 3 28 <0.005 23 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 37 250 0.0062 <0.01
4/1/21 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 17 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.6 <3 161 <0.0002 3 28 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.2 <0.005 37 260 0.0053 <0.01
7/9/21 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 21 <0.001 16 2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 7.5 3.1 172 <0.0002 3 29 <0.005 24 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 37 260 0.0065 <0.01
10/3/21 <0.005-J <0.003-J <0.1-J 21-J <0.001-J 16-J <2-J <0.01-J <0.01-J 0.2-J 8.1-J 4-J 164-J <0.0002-J 3-J 28-J <0.005-J 23-J <0.1-J 1.6-J <0.002-J 0.9-J <0.005-J 38-J 250-J 0.0061-J <0.01-J
2/5/22 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 22 <0.001 16 3 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 10.6 6.6 165 <0.0002 3 28 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 36 250 0.0059 <0.01
4/2/22 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 17 5 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 7 <3 164 <0.0002 3 29 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 37 250 0.0063 <0.01
7/8/22 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 22 <0.001 18 5-J <0.01 <0.01 0.2 9.5-J 5.8-J 163 <0.0002 3 29 <0.005 23 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.2 <0.005 38 310 0.0055 <0.01
10/15/22 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 22 <0.001 16 2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 8.6 4.9 160 <0.0002 3 30 <0.005 26 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 1.3 <0.005 37 290 0.0055 <0.01
3/10/23 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 22 <0.001 14 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 9.8 5.7 157 <0.0002 2 29 <0.005 21 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 33 250 0.0061 <0.01
4/22/23 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 15 6 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 9.9 6.1 152 <0.0002 3 28 <0.005 23 <0.1 1.7 <0.002 0.2 <0.005 33 230 0.0056 <0.01
RM18
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Date Ag (mg/L)As (mg/L)
Ba
(mg/L)
Ca
(mg/L)Cd (mg/L)Cl (mg/L)
CO3
(mg/L)
Cr
(mg/L)
Cu
(mg/L)F (mg/L)
Gross
Alpha
(pCi/L)
Calculated
Adjusted
Gross
Alpha
(pCi/L)
HCO3
(mg/L)Hg (mg/L)
K
(mg/L)
Mg
(mg/L)
Mo
(mg/L)
Na
(mg/L)
NH3 as N
(mg/L)
NO3+NO2
as N
(mg/L)Pb (mg/L)
Ra-226
(pCi/L)
Se
(mg/L)
SO4
(mg/L)
TDS
(mg/L)
Unat
(mg/L)
Zn
(mg/L)
11/30/03 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 <0.001 8.1 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 <0.001 <0.005 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.005 25.4 225 0.0035 0.01
3/23/04 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21.4 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 186 <0.001 2.5 24.8 <0.005 21.8 <0.1 1.44 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 26.1 208 0.0034 0.01
9/21/04 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 22.1 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 192 <0.001 3.1 23.9 <0.005 19.9 <0.1 1.33 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 25 212 0.0031 0.05
11/29/04 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20.5 <0.001 8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 195 <0.001 2.5 24.8 <0.005 21.3 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.5 <0.005 23 201 0.003 <0.01
3/20/05 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20.6 <0.001 8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 184 <0.001 2.2 24.2 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 24 210 0.0032 <0.01
6/12/05 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20.7 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.1 174 <0.001 1.8 24.1 <0.005 21.2 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 23 188 0.0034 <0.01
9/11/05 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20.4 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 188 <0.001 2 23.8 <0.005 20.8 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 26 172 0.0032 <0.01
12/13/05 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 18.1 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 180 <0.001 2.2 22.2 <0.005 20.8 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 26 233 0.003 <0.01
3/11/06 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21.1 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 183 <0.001 2.4 24.6 <0.005 21.1 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 26 214 0.0031 <0.01
6/11/06 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 19.4 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 171 <0.001 2.5 23.2 <0.005 18.6 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.5 <0.005 30 178 0.0032 <0.01
9/19/06 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 175 <0.001 2.3 24.4 <0.005 21.5 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 27 194 0.0032 <0.01
12/8/06 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 176 <0.001 2.4 23.8 <0.005 21.1 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 26 194 0.0032 <0.01
3/11/07 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21.3 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4 <3 181 <0.001 2.5 25.5 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 25 178 0.0032 <0.01
6/24/07 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20.9 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 6.5 4.33 183 <0.001 2.5 24.9 <0.005 20.7 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 26 188 0.0032 <0.01
9/1/07 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 19.6 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 6 3.97 185 <0.001 2.6 22.8 <0.005 20.6 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 27 186 0.003 <0.01
12/3/07 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 18.5 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 7.8 5.57 178 <0.001 2.3 21.6 <0.005 18.8 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 27 187 0.0033 <0.01
3/25/08 <0.005 <0.003 0.1-J 20.5 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 187 <0.001 2.4 24.6 <0.005 21.8 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 40 192-J 0.0029 <0.01
6/29/08 <0.005-J <0.003 0.1-J 21 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 7.3 5.27 181 <0.001 2 24 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.37-J <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 26 179 0.003-J <0.01
9/23/08 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20.6 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 192 <0.001 2.3 24.9 <0.005 19.6 <0.1 1.46-J <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 27 196 0.003 <0.01
12/16/08 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20.4 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 176 <0.001 2.4 23.4 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 24 196 0.0029 <0.01
2/9/09 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18-J <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 178 <0.001 2 21-J <0.005 20-J <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 26 176 0.0029 <0.01
4/12/09 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 204 <0.001 2-J 22 <0.005 19-J <0.1-J 1.3 <0.002 0.2 <0.005 23 200 0.0028 <0.01
8/24/09 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 19 <0.001 5-R <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 187-J <0.001 2 22 <0.005 19 <0.05 1.4 <0.002 0.67 <0.005 27 192 0.0029 <0.01
9/29/09 8 <2 0.2 183-J 25 205
10/19/09 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 19 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 188-J <0.001 2 21 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 24 200 0.0029 <0.01
2/1/10 <0.005-R <0.003-R <0.1-R 19-R <0.001-R 5-R <2-R <0.01-R <0.01-R 0.2-R 195-R <0.001-R 2-R 21-R <0.005-R 20-R <0.1-R 1.4-R <0.002-R <0.2 <0.005-R 24-R 130-R 0.0031-R <0.01-R
3/22/10 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20 <0.001 9 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 195-J <0.001 2 23 <0.005 21 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 <0.005 25 211 0.003 <0.01
4/12/10 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 21 <0.001 5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 198-R <0.001-R 3 23 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.27 <0.005-R 25 189 0.003 <0.01-R
8/30/10 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 6.8 <20-J <0.01 <0.01 0.23 3.7 <3 150-J <0.001 2.3 22 <0.005 19 0.013 1.4 <0.002 <0.26-R <0.005 24 180 0.003 <0.01
10/18/10 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.21 3.3 <3 150 <0.001 2.5 22 <0.005 20 1.4 <0.002 0.26 <0.005 23 170 0.0028 <0.01
1/24/11 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 7.3 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.22 4.9 3.00 150 <0.001 2.3 22 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.23 <0.005 23 200 0.0028 <0.01
4/11/11 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4 <3 150 <0.001 2.1 23 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 23 210 0.0029 <0.01
7/25/11 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 7.3 <4 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4.1 <3 150 <0.001 2.5 23 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.25 <0.005 22 210 0.0027 <0.01
10/17/11 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 7.1 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 3.9 <3 150 <0.001 2.2 23 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.31 <0.005 23 200 0.0031 <0.01
2/13/12 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 7.3 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.2 <3 150 <0.001 2.2 21 <0.005 17 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.26 <0.005 23 200 0.0028 <0.01
4/30/12 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4.1 <3 150 <0.001 2.1 22 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.35-J <0.005 22 200 0.0028 <0.01
7/23/12 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 7.5 <4 <0.01 <0.01 0.23 3.8 <3 150 <0.001 2.4 22 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.44 <0.005 23 180 0.0028 <0.01
10/1/12 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 7.4 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.21 2.7 <3 150 <0.001 2.1 21 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.29 <0.005 23 210 0.0026 <0.01
2/19/13 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20 <0.001 7.2 <8 <0.01 <0.01 0.22 4.9 3.07 150 <0.001 2.4 24 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.35 <0.005 25 210 0.0027 <0.01
5/21/13 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 7.9 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.41-R 4.7 <3 150 <0.001 2.6 22 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.24 <0.005 25 210 0.0027 <0.01
7/15/13 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 7.4 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4.5 <3 150 <0.001 2.4 23 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.39 <0.005 23 210 0.0026 <0.01
11/4/13 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 7.6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 3.5 <3 150 <0.001 2.1 22 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 24 200 0.0027 <0.01
2/24/14 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 19 <0.001 7.7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4.8 <3 150 <0.001 2.3 21 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.27 <0.005 24 200 0.0028 <0.01
4/28/14 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20 <0.001 7.3 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4.3 <3 150 <0.001 2.5 23 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 23 200 0.0028 <0.01
4/28/14 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20 <0.001 7.4 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4.3 <3 150 <0.001 2.5 23 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 0.0087 23 200 0.0028 <0.01
4/28/14 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20 <0.001 7.3 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.3 3.40 150 <0.001 2.5 23 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 23 210 0.0028 <0.01
4/28/14 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20 <0.001 7.4 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.7 3.80 150 <0.001 2.5 23 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 23 200 0.0028 <0.01
7/21/14 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 7.7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 5.4 3.43 150 <0.001 2.5 22 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.43 <0.005 23 200 0.0029 <0.01
10/27/14 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 19 <0.001 7.5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4.5 <3 150 <0.001 2.4 21 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.26 0.0077 23 200 0.0028 <0.01
2/23/15 <0.005 <0.003-R <0.1 19 <0.001 7.3 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 6.3 4.46 150 <0.001 2 22 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.27 <0.005 23 200 0.0027 <0.01
2/23/15 <0.003
5/11/15 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 7.5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 <3 <3 150 <0.001 2.5 23 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.261 <0.005 24 200 <0.003 <0.01
8/10/15 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 7.4 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4.5 <3 140 <0.001 2.5 22 <0.005 20 0.13 1.5 <0.002 0.23 <0.005 23 210 0.003 <0.01
10/19/15 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 8 <8 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4.6 <3 140 <0.001 2.3 21 <0.005 21 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 25 200 0.0029 <0.01
3/7/16 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20 <0.001 7.5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4.7 <3 150 <0.001 2.4 22 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.36 <0.005 24 190 0.0027 0.013
4/29/16 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 7.7 <8 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.1 <3 150 <0.001 2.5 22 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.24 <0.005 24 230 0.0031 <0.01
8/4/16 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 7.2 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 3.2 <3 150 <0.001 2.6 22 <0.005 19 <0.1-R 1.5 <0.002 0.22 <0.005 23 190 0.0028 <0.01
9/27/16 <0.1
10/18/16 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 7 4 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6.6 4.8 147 <0.001 2 21 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 21 210 0.0026 <0.01
2/14/17 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.4 4.4 153 <0.001 3 25 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.9 <0.002 1 <0.005 24 210 0.003 <0.01
5/2/17 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 7 3 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.3 3.7 146 <0.001 3 21 <0.005 21 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 21 200 0.0023 <0.01
7/17/17 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 6 4 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.7 3.8 146 <0.001 2 21 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 21 220 0.0028 <0.01
RM18
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Date Ag (mg/L)As (mg/L)
Ba
(mg/L)
Ca
(mg/L)Cd (mg/L)Cl (mg/L)
CO3
(mg/L)
Cr
(mg/L)
Cu
(mg/L)F (mg/L)
Gross
Alpha
(pCi/L)
Calculated
Adjusted
Gross
Alpha
(pCi/L)
HCO3
(mg/L)Hg (mg/L)
K
(mg/L)
Mg
(mg/L)
Mo
(mg/L)
Na
(mg/L)
NH3 as N
(mg/L)
NO3+NO2
as N
(mg/L)Pb (mg/L)
Ra-226
(pCi/L)
Se
(mg/L)
SO4
(mg/L)
TDS
(mg/L)
Unat
(mg/L)
Zn
(mg/L)
10/31/17 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 7 3 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6.1 4.7 153 <0.001 2 20 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 21 200 0.002 <0.01
2/19/18 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.1 2.7 145 <0.001 2 20 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 21 200 0.002 <0.01
4/23/18 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 7 4 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 3.9 2.4 146 <0.001 2 20 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.6 <0.005 21 190 0.0022 <0.01
7/9/18 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 7 5 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5 3.3 146 <0.001 2 21 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 1.3-J <0.005 20 200 0.0026 <0.01
10/9/18 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 22 <0.001 17 5 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 8.1 4.6 160 <0.001 3 27 <0.005 26 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.5 <0.005 39 240 0.0051 <0.01
1/26/19 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 7 4 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5 4.3 149 <0.001 3 21 <0.005 23 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 1.2 <0.005 20 220 0.0023 <0.01
4/28/19 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 6 4 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.4 2.7 149 <0.001 3 21 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.2 <0.005 20 210 0.0026 <0.01
7/28/19 <0.01 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 7 6 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.3 3.7 143 <0.0002 2 21 <0.01 19 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.3 <0.01 21 200 0.0023 <0.01
11/3/19 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.6 3.6 156 <0.0002 3 20 <0.005 21 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 21 210 0.003 <0.01
2/16/20 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 7 2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 3.9 2.3 148 <0.0002 3 21 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 21 210 0.0024 <0.01
5/24/20 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 3.1 <2 150 <0.0002 3 22 <0.005 20 0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 20 230 0.0025 <0.01
7/7/20 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 3.7 <3 153 <0.0002 2 23 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 21 220 0.0034 <0.01
10/5/20 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 8 3 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.2 2.2 150 <0.0002 3 22 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 21 210 0.003 <0.01
1/22/21 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5 3.1 153 <0.0002 3 21 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.2 <0.005 22 210 0.0028 <0.01
4/1/21 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6.6 4.5 154 <0.0002 2 21 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 20 210 0.0031 <0.01
7/9/21 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 6 2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.2 2.2 150 <0.0002 3 22 <0.005 21 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 21 210 0.0029 <0.01
10/3/21 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.7 3.8 157 <0.0002 3 21 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.5 <0.005 22 210 0.0029 <0.01
2/5/22 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 7 5 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 3.8 <2 156 <0.0002 2 21 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 20 180 0.0029 <0.01
4/2/22 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 7 3 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 3.7 <2 158 <0.0002 3 22 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 20 190 0.003 <0.01
7/9/22 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 7 4-J <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.3-J 3.2-J 158 <0.0002 3 22 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 21 270 0.003 <0.01
10/16/22 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 7 6 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 8.1 6.4 147 <0.0002 3 23 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 1.2 <0.005 20 250 0.0025 <0.01
3/11/23 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 20 <0.001 6 3 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6 4 148 <0.0002 2 23 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 18 210 0.003 <0.01
4/22/23 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 19 <0.001 6 4 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.1 3 148 <0.0002 3 22 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 19 190 0.003 <0.01
RM19
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Date Ag (mg/L)As (mg/L)
Ba
(mg/L)
Ca
(mg/L)Cd (mg/L)
Cl
(mg/L)
CO3
(mg/L)Cr (mg/L)Cu (mg/L)F (mg/L)
Gross
Alpha
(pCi/L)
Calculated
Adjusted
Gross
Alpha
(pCi/L)
HCO3
(mg/L)Hg (mg/L)
K
(mg/L)
Mg
(mg/L)
Mo
(mg/L)
Na
(mg/L)
NH3 as N
(mg/L)
NO3+NO2
as N
(mg/L)Pb (mg/L)
Ra-226
(pCi/L)
Se
(mg/L)
SO4
(mg/L)
TDS
(mg/L)
Unat
(mg/L)Zn (mg/L)
11/30/03 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 <0.001 5.6 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 <0.001 <0.005 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.005 23.2 225 0.0034 0.03
3/22/04 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 19.1 <0.001 8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 174 <0.001 2.4 24.4 <0.005 17.3 <0.1 1.45 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 23 208 0.0033 <0.01
9/21/04 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20.4 <0.001 4 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 183 <0.001 2.1 23.4 <0.005 18.5 <0.1 1.34 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 23 197 0.0028 0.04
11/7/04 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20.8 <0.001 3 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 189 <0.001 2.7 25.3 <0.005 21.4 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 22 176 0.0029 <0.01
3/20/05 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 19.9 <0.001 5 <2 <0.01 0.06 0.2 184 <0.001 2.4 24.2 <0.005 19.4 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.5 <0.005 22 203 0.0032 <0.01
6/12/05 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 19.9 <0.001 5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 173 <0.001 1.9 24 <0.005 20.3 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 22 188 0.0032 <0.01
9/11/05 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 19.6 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 186 <0.001 2.1 23.8 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.2 <0.005 23 168 0.0033 <0.01
12/12/05 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 18.2 <0.001-J 5 2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 177 <0.001 2.4 21.9 <0.005 19.4 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 23 194 0.0033 0.02
3/11/06 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20.2 <0.001 5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 183 <0.001 2.5 24.8 <0.005 20.2 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 23 174 0.0032 <0.01
6/11/06 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 18.4 <0.001 5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 171 <0.001 2.6 23 <0.005 17.3 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 30 174 0.0033 <0.01
9/19/06 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20.2 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 175 <0.001 2.4 24.7 <0.005 20.8 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 24 182 0.0034 <0.01
12/9/06 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 19.6 <0.001 5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 175 <0.001 2.6 24.3 <0.005 20.6 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 24 188 0.0035 <0.01
3/12/07 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20.5 <0.001 5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.9 <3 181 <0.001 2.6 25.6 <0.005 21 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 22 174 0.0033 <0.01
6/24/07 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20 <0.001 3 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6.7 4.47 189 <0.001 2.6 24.8 <0.005 19.5 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 23 190 0.0033 <0.01
9/1/07 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 18.6 <0.001 5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 5 <3 186 <0.001 2.7 22.2 <0.005 19.6 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 25 182 0.0032 <0.01
12/3/07 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 17.6 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 7 4.63 180 <0.001 2.4 21.3 <0.005 18.1 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 24 185 0.0035 <0.01
3/25/08 <0.005 <0.003 0.1-J 19.6 <0.001 4 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 186 <0.001 2.5 24.6 <0.005 20.7 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 22 188-J 0.0031 <0.01
6/29/08 <0.005-J <0.003 0.1-J 20 <0.001 5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.7 <3 182 <0.001 3 25 <0.005 21 <0.1 1.45-J <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 26 172-J 0.003-J <0.01
9/23/08 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 20.8 <0.001 5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 179 <0.001 2.4 24.3 <0.005 19.2 <0.1 1.45-J <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 25 188 0.0033 <0.01
12/16/08 <0.005 <0.003 0.1-J 19.4 <0.001 4 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 178 <0.001 2.6 23.8 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.59 <0.002 0.37-J <0.005 22 196 0.0031 <0.01
2/8/09 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 18-J <0.001 4 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 180 <0.001 2 21-J <0.005 20-J <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.24 <0.005 25 156 0.0031 <0.01
4/12/09 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 18 <0.001 6 1 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 183 <0.001 2-J 21 <0.005 19-J <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 22 194 0.0031 <0.01
8/24/09 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 18 <0.001 5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 188-J <0.001 3 22 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.52 <0.005 25 284-R 0.0031 <0.01
8/25/09 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 18 <0.001 6.4-R <20 <0.01 <0.01 0.22-R 4.28-R 160 <0.001 2.8 22 <0.005 18 <0.1-R 1.5 <0.002 <0.2-R <0.005 22-R 200 0.003 0.014
9/29/09 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 19 <0.001 7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 190-J <0.001 2 22 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 23 181-R 0.0031 <0.01
10/18/09 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 18 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 192-J <0.001 2 22 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.22 <0.005 22 205 0.0031 <0.01
2/1/10 <0.005-R <0.003-R 0.1-R 19-R <0.001-R 5-R <2-R <0.01-R <0.01-R 0.2-R 196-R <0.001-R 2-R 21-R <0.005-R 19-R <0.1-R 1.4-R <0.002-R 0.05 <0.005-R 22-R 119-R 0.0032-R <0.01-R
3/22/10 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 19 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 204-J <0.001 2 23 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.005 23 216 0.0031 <0.01
4/12/10 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 22 <0.001 5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 196-R <0.001 3 25 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.23 <0.005 22 202 0.0032 <0.01
8/30/10 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 19 <0.001 5.5 <20-J <0.01 <0.01 0.22 4 <3 160-J <0.001 2.4 23 <0.005 19 0.014 1.5 <0.002 <0.09-R <0.005 22 180 0.0032 <0.01
10/18/10 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 19 <0.001 5.6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.22 4.4 <3 150 <0.001 2.5 22 <0.005 19 1.5 <0.002 0.26 <0.005 21 200 0.003 0.024
1/24/11 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 18 <0.001 5.9 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.5 3.40 150 <0.001 2.4 22 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.25 <0.005 21 190 0.0031 <0.01
4/11/11 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 19 <0.001 5.7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4 <3 150 <0.001 2.2 23 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.29 <0.005 21 210 0.0033 <0.01
7/25/11 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 18 <0.001 5.9 <4 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 3.4 <3 150 <0.001 2.5 23 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.21 <0.005 21 210 0.0034 <0.01
10/17/11 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 18 <0.001 5.8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.5 <3 150 <0.001 2.3 23 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.23 <0.005 21 190 0.0032 <0.01
2/13/12 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 18 <0.001 6.1 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 3.3 <3 150 <0.001 2.3 21 <0.005 17 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.29 <0.005 21 200 0.0028 <0.01
4/30/12 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 18 <0.001 5.7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4.3 <3 150 <0.001 2.2 22 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2-J <0.005 20 190 0.0029 <0.01
7/23/12 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 19 <0.001 6.1 <4 <0.01 <0.01 0.22 4.7 <3 150 <0.001 2.2 22 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.28 <0.005 21 170 0.0029 0.011
10/1/12 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 18 <0.001 6.2 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.22 3.4 <3 150 <0.001 2.2 22 <0.005 17 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.31 <0.005 20 210 0.0027 <0.01
2/19/13 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 19 <0.001 5.8 <8 <0.01 <0.01 0.22 7.9 5.94 150 <0.001 2.4 24 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.26 <0.005 22 190 0.0029 <0.01
5/21/13 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 19 <0.001 6.4 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.25 5.1 3.20 150 <0.001 2.6 22 <0.005 17 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 <0.2 <0.003 21 210 0.0028 <0.01
7/15/13 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 19 <0.001 6.1 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.1 3.20 150 <0.001 2.4 23 <0.005 17 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.36 <0.005 21 220 0.0028 <0.01
7/15/13 5
11/4/13 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 18 <0.001 6.2 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.21 4 <3 150 <0.001 2.1 22 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.45 <0.005 22 190 0.0026 <0.01
2/24/14 <0.005 <0.003 0.12 19 <0.001 6.3 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 5.2 3.23 150 <0.001 2.5 22 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.26 <0.005 22 200 0.0029 <0.01
4/28/14 <0.005 <0.003 0.12 19 <0.001 6.1 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4.3 <3 150 <0.001 2.5 23 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.25 <0.005 21 200 0.0032 <0.01
7/21/14 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 19 <0.001 6.2 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4.9 <3 150 <0.001 2.5 23 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.25 <0.005 21 220 0.0032 <0.01
10/27/14 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 18 <0.001 6.1 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 6.1 4.06 150 <0.001 2.4 22 <0.005 17 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.23 <0.005 21 200 0.003 <0.01
2/23/15 <0.005 <0.003-R 0.11 19 <0.001 5.9 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 3.8 <3 150 <0.001 2.1 23 <0.005 17 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.31 <0.005 21 200 0.003 <0.01
2/23/15 <0.003
5/11/15 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 18 <0.001 6.2 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 5.8 3.49 150 <0.001 2.5 23 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.29 <0.005 22 200 0.0034 <0.01
8/10/15 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 19 <0.001 6.1 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.4 <3 150 <0.001 2.6 23 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 22 200 0.003 <0.01
10/19/15 <0.005 <0.003 0.10 19 <0.001 6.6 <8 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 5.2 3.3 150 <0.001 2.3 21 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.37 <0.005 23 180 0.0028 <0.01
3/7/16 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 20 <0.001 6.3 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4.2 <3 150 <0.001 2.5 22 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.279 <0.005 22 180 0.003 <0.01
4/29/16 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 18 <0.001 6.3 <8 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 5.8 3.62 150 <0.001 2.5 22 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.32 <0.005 22 220 0.0032 0.019
8/4/16 <0.005 <0.003 0.11 19 <0.001 5.9 <2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 4 <3 140 <0.001 2.7 22 <0.005 18 <0.1-R 1.6 <0.002 0.25 <0.005 21 180 0.0031 <0.01
9/27/16 <0.1
10/18/16 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 18 <0.001 5 5 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 8.1 6.1 147 <0.001 3 22 <0.005 21 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.6 <0.005 19 200 0.003 <0.01
10/18/16 6.6 4.5
2/14/17 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 5-J <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6.7 5.1 152 <0.001 3 23 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 1.2 <0.005 20 200 0.0023-J <0.01
5/2/17 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 5 2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.6 4.1 147 <0.001 2 21 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 19 200 0.0023 <0.01
7/17/17 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 5 5 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6.2 4.5 147 <0.001 3 21 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.8 <0.005 19 220 0.0025 <0.01
RM19
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Date Ag (mg/L)As (mg/L)
Ba
(mg/L)
Ca
(mg/L)Cd (mg/L)
Cl
(mg/L)
CO3
(mg/L)Cr (mg/L)Cu (mg/L)F (mg/L)
Gross
Alpha
(pCi/L)
Calculated
Adjusted
Gross
Alpha
(pCi/L)
HCO3
(mg/L)Hg (mg/L)
K
(mg/L)
Mg
(mg/L)
Mo
(mg/L)
Na
(mg/L)
NH3 as N
(mg/L)
NO3+NO2
as N
(mg/L)Pb (mg/L)
Ra-226
(pCi/L)
Se
(mg/L)
SO4
(mg/L)
TDS
(mg/L)
Unat
(mg/L)Zn (mg/L)
10/30/17 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 17 <0.001 6 2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6 4.4 154 <0.001 3 20 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 20 210 0.0024 <0.01
2/19/18 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 5 3 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.7 3.3 147 <0.001 3 21 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.8 <0.005 19 190 0.0021 <0.01
4/23/18 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 5 6 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.8 4.4 145 <0.001 3 21 <0.005 21 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.6 <0.005 19 200 0.0022 <0.01
7/9/18 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 16 <0.001 5 4 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 7.6 5.7 147 <0.001 2 21 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 2-J <0.005 19 180 0.0028 <0.01
10/8/18 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 6 4 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6.4 4.8 154 <0.001 3 20 <0.005 23 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 20 190 0.0024 <0.01
1/26/19 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 17 <0.001 5 4 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5 4.4 151 <0.001 3 21 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 2.8 <0.005 19 210 0.0023 <0.01
4/28/19 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 17 <0.001 5 5 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.3 3.7 149 <0.001 3 21 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 18 210 0.0025 <0.01
7/28/19 <0.01 <0.003 <0.1 17 <0.001 6 9 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.9 4.1 143 <0.0002 2 21 <0.01 18 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.3 <0.01 19 200 0.0026 <0.01
11/3/19 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 17 <0.001 5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.1 3 155 <0.0002 3 20 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 19 200 0.0031 <0.01
2/16/20 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 17 <0.001 6 3 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6.4 4.7 149 <0.0002 3 20 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 19 200 0.0025 <0.01
5/24/20 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 2.6 <2 153 <0.0002 3 22 <0.005 19 0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.2 <0.005 18 220 0.0026 <0.01
7/7/20 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 19 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.5 3 153 <0.0002 2 23 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 19 220 0.0037 <0.01
10/5/20 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 6 2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.5 3.7 152 <0.0002 3 22 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 19 210 0.0027 <0.01
1/22/21 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 19 <0.001 5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6.4 4.5 156 <0.0002 3 23 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 18 210 0.0029 <0.01
4/1/21 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 18 <0.001 4 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.7 3.6 152 <0.0002 3 23 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.5 <0.005 12 210 0.0031 <0.01
7/9/21 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 5 3 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.1 2.4 149 <0.0002 3 22 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 19 210 0.0025 <0.01
10/3/21 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.1 3.2 158 <0.0002 3 21 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.6 <0.005 20 210 0.0027 <0.01
2/5/22 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 19 <0.001 5 5 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4 <2 155 <0.0002 3 22 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 0.2 <0.005 18 190 0.0031 <0.01
4/2/22 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 17 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.6 2.5 159 <0.0002 2 23 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.3 <0.005 19 190 0.0032 <0.01
7/9/22 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 18 <0.001 5 4-J <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.1-J 2.3-J 156 <0.0002 3 22 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.4 <0.002 <0.2 <0.005 18 250 0.0026 <0.01
10/16/22 <0.005 <0.003 <0.1 19 <0.001 6 4 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.2 3.6 150 <0.0002 3 24 <0.005 21 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.7 <0.005 19 240 0.0023 <0.01
3/11/23 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 19 <0.001 5 5 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.7 2.7 146 <0.0002 2 24 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.5 <0.002 0.4 <0.005 17 200 0.0029 <0.01
4/24/23 <0.005 <0.003 0.1 18 <0.001 5 3 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6 4 147 <0.0002 3 22 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.6 <0.002 0.2 <0.005 17 190 0.003 <0.01
RM20
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Date Ag (mg/L)
As
(mg/L)
Ba
(mg/L)
Ca
(mg/L)Cd (mg/L)
Cl
(mg/L)
CO3
(mg/L)Cr (mg/L)Cu (mg/L)F (mg/L)
Gross
Alpha
(pCi/L)
Calculated
Adjusted
Gross
Alpha
(pCi/L)
HCO3
(mg/L)Hg (mg/L)
K
(mg/L)
Mg
(mg/L)
Mo
(mg/L)
Na
(mg/L)
NH3 as N
(mg/L)
NO3+NO2
as N
(mg/L)Pb (mg/L)
Ra-226
(pCi/L)
Se
(mg/L)
SO4
(mg/L)
TDS
(mg/L)
Unat
(mg/L)Zn (mg/L)
11/30/03 <0.005 0.01 0.2 <0.001 12.6 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 <0.001 <0.005 <0.1 1.2 <0.002 0.02 107 315 0.0065 <0.01
3/23/04 <0.005 0.01 0.2 40 <0.001 15 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 126 <0.001 2.8 27.4 <0.005 18.1 <0.1 1.27 <0.002 <0.2 0.025 132 323 0.006 <0.01
9/21/04 <0.005 0.009 0.2 42.1 <0.001 11 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 122 <0.001 2.5 25.6 <0.005 19.6 <0.1 1.21 <0.002 <0.2 0.023 131 323 0.0058 0.03
11/7/04 <0.005 0.01 0.2 44 <0.001 11 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 124 <0.001 3.1 27.5 <0.005 22.5 <0.1 1.2 <0.002 <0.2 0.023 126 314 0.0061 <0.01
3/20/05 <0.005 0.01 0.2 43.2 <0.001 13 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 126 <0.001 2.8 26.6 <0.005 20.5 <0.1 1.2 <0.002 <0.2 0.022 121 341 0.0062 <0.01
6/12/05 <0.005 0.009 0.2 43.1 <0.001 12 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 121 <0.001 2.4 26.4 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 <0.2 0.022 120 332 0.0067 <0.01
9/11/05 <0.005 0.01 0.2 42.1 <0.001 12 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 130 <0.001 2.5 25.9 <0.005 21.4 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.4 0.022 125 294 0.0067 <0.01
12/13/05 <0.005 0.009 0.2 36.4 <0.001-J 10 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 128 <0.001 2.8 23.6 <0.005 20.7 <0.1 1.2 <0.002 <0.2 0.018 130 315 0.0068 <0.01
3/11/06 <0.005 0.009 0.2 43.2 <0.001 11 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 125 <0.001 3 26.5 <0.005 21.2 <0.1 1.2 <0.002 <0.2 0.019 115 302 0.0062 <0.01
6/11/06 <0.005 0.01 0.2 37.3 <0.001 11 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 121 <0.001 3 24.1 <0.005 18.6 <0.1 1.2 <0.002 0.4 0.021 115-J 278 0.007 <0.01
9/20/06 <0.005 0.01 0.2 42 <0.001 11 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 165 <0.001 2.8 25.8 <0.005 21.7 <0.1 1.1 <0.002 <0.2 0.02 125 286 0.0073 <0.01
12/8/06 <0.005 0.01 0.2 40.9 <0.001 10 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 126 <0.001 2.9 24.5 <0.005 21 <0.1 1.2 <0.002 <0.2 0.018 112 288 0.0071 <0.01
3/11/07 <0.005 0.01 0.2 41.7 <0.001 9 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 5.2 <3 132 <0.001 3 26.3 <0.005 21.8 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 <0.2 0.018 113 282 0.0073 <0.01
6/24/07 <0.005 0.01 0.2 40.5 <0.001 10 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 4.7 <3 134 <0.001 3 25 <0.005 20.4 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.5 0.018 112 298 0.0072 <0.01
9/1/07 <0.005 0.01 0.2 38.4 <0.001 10 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 4.3 <3 135 <0.001 3.2 23.4 <0.005 20.4 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.5 0.017 106 280 0.0071 <0.01
12/4/07 <0.005 0.011 0.2 37 <0.001 10 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.6 <3 131 <0.001 2.9 23.2 <0.005 19.2 <0.1 1.2 <0.002 <0.2 0.018 103 290 0.0077 <0.01
3/26/08 <0.005 0.01 0.2-J 39.3 <0.001 10 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 138 <0.001 3 25.6 <0.005 21.7 <0.1 1.2 <0.002 <0.2 0.017 106 285-J 0.0072 <0.01
6/30/08 <0.005-J 0.01 0.2-J 44 <0.001 10 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6.5 <3 136 <0.001 3 26 <0.005 20 <0.1 2.2-J <0.002 <0.2 0.016 112 294 0.0075-J <0.01
9/23/08 <0.005 0.009 0.1 42.1 <0.001 8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 134 <0.001 2.8 26.2 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.23-J <0.002 <0.2 0.015 108 286 0.0075 <0.01
12/15/08 <0.005 0.009-J 0.1 38.7 <0.001 8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 134 <0.001 2.9 23.8 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.2 <0.002 <0.2 0.014 99 280-J 0.007 <0.01
2/9/09 <0.005 0.009 0.1 34-J <0.001 9 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 135 <0.001 2 21-J <0.005 19-J <0.1 1.2 <0.002 <0.2 0.014 99 270 0.0078 <0.01
4/13/09 <0.005 0.009 0.1 35 <0.001 10 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 140 <0.001 3-J 22 <0.005 20-J <0.1 1.1 <0.002 0.26 0.015 101 291 0.0075 <0.01
8/24/09 <0.005 0.01 0.2 37 <0.001 10 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 143-J <0.001 3 22 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.2 <0.002 0.36 0.015-J 107 276 0.0083 <0.01
10/18/09 <0.005 0.01 0.2 36 <0.001 8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 146-J <0.001 3 22 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.2 <0.002 0.03 0.015 103 319 0.0082 <0.01
2/1/10 <0.005-R 0.01-R 0.1-R 37-R <0.001-R 8-R <2-R <0.01-R <0.01-R 0.2-R 150-R <0.001-R 3-R 22-R <0.005-R 20-R <0.1-R 1.2-R <0.002-R <0.2 0.014-R 101-R 216-R 0.0089-R <0.01-R
3/22/10 <0.005 0.009 0.1 36 <0.001 6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 152-J <0.001 3 22 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.1 <0.002 0.014 100 275 0.0088 <0.01
4/12/10 <0.005 0.01 0.2 40 <0.001 8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 152-R <0.001 3 24 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.2 <0.002 0.29 0.014 100 282 0.009 <0.01
8/30/10 <0.005 0.0089 0.15 37 <0.001 9.1 <20-J <0.01 <0.01 0.25 5.1 <3 120-J <0.001 2.9 23 <0.005 20 <0.1 1.1 <0.002 <0.23-R 0.015 98 280 0.0091 <0.01
10/18/10 <0.005 0.0092 0.14 38 <0.001 9.2 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.23 6.3 <3 110 <0.001 3 23 <0.005 21 1.2 <0.002 <0.2 0.015 97 270 0.009 <0.01
1/24/11 <0.005 0.0096 0.14 36 <0.001 9.3 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.23 7.8 <3 120 <0.001 2.8 22 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.1 <0.002 <0.2 0.014 94 270 0.0091 <0.01
4/11/11 <0.005 0.0088 0.14 35 <0.001 8.8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.22 6.5 <3 120 <0.001 2.6 23 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.2 <0.002 <0.2 0.015 93 290 0.0094 <0.01
7/25/11 <0.005 0.009 0.14 37 <0.001 8.8 <4 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6.2 <3 120 <0.001 3 23 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.1 <0.002 0.211 0.011 90 300 0.0094 <0.01
10/17/11 <0.005 0.0095 0.15 35 <0.001 8.5 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.23 6.9 <3 120 <0.001 2.8 23 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.2 <0.002 0.21 0.012 91 270 0.01 <0.01
2/13/12 <0.005 0.0093 0.14 34 <0.001 8.7 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.21 5.6 <3 120 <0.001 3.1 21 <0.005 17 <0.1 1.2 <0.002 0.26 0.012 89 270 0.0094 <0.01
4/30/12 <0.005 0.0091 0.14 34 <0.001 8.1 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.21 4.5 <3 120 <0.001 2.6 21 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.1 <0.002 0.27-J 0.011 86 270 0.0097 <0.01
7/23/12 <0.005 0.009 0.14 36 <0.001 8.4 <4 <0.01 <0.01 0.28 5.9 <3 120 <0.001 2.5 22 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.1 <0.002 0.29 0.013 88 250 0.0092 <0.01
10/1/12 <0.005 0.009 0.14 33 <0.001 8.3 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.25 4.3 <3 120 <0.001 2.5 21 <0.005 18 <0.1 1 <0.002 0.32 0.01 86 250 0.0094 <0.01
2/19/13 <0.005 0.0093 0.15 36 <0.001 7.8 <8 <0.01 <0.01 0.26 10.3 3.53 120 <0.001 2.9 23 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.2 <0.002 <0.2 0.0081 91 260 0.01 <0.01
5/21/13 <0.005 0.009 0.14 35 <0.001 8.2 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.29 8.5 <3 120 <0.001 3 21 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.2 <0.002 0.27 0.0077 83 270 0.0094 <0.01
7/15/13 <0.005 0.0096 0.14 34 <0.001 7.9 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.22 6.1 <3 120 <0.001 2.9 22 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.3 <0.002 0.202 0.012 81 290 0.01 <0.01
11/4/13 <0.005 0.0084 0.14 31 <0.001 8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.24 6.8 <3 120 <0.001 2.4 20 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.1 <0.002 0.34 0.0086 82 240 0.0095 <0.01
2/24/14 <0.005 0.0092 0.15 33 <0.001 7.9 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.21 5.9 <3 120 <0.001 2.7 20 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.1 <0.002 0.27 0.011 81 250 0.01 <0.01
4/28/14 <0.005 0.011 0.15 33 <0.001 7.6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.22 4.8 <3 120 <0.001 2.9 21 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.1 <0.002 0.24 0.015 77 250 0.011 <0.01
4/28/14 0.0098 0.0074
7/21/14 <0.005 0.0093 0.14 33 <0.001 7.9 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.21 8.8 <3 120 <0.001 2.9 21 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.1 <0.002 0.24 0.0057 76 250 0.011 <0.01
10/27/14 <0.005 0.0094 0.14 31 <0.001 7.8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.22 7.9 <3 120 <0.001 2.8 19 <0.005 17 <0.1 1.1 <0.002 0.29 0.0063 74 250 0.011 <0.01
2/23/15 <0.005 0.0091-R 0.14 31 <0.001 7.6 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.22 8.7 1.9 120 <0.001 2.4 19 <0.005 17 <0.1 1.1 <0.002 0.27 <0.005 71 240 0.01 <0.01
0.0074
5/11/15 <0.005 0.0098 0.15 33 <0.001 8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.22 7.3 <3 120 <0.001 2.9 21 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.1 <0.002 0.225 0.011 71 240 0.012 <0.01
8/10/15 <0.005 0.0099 0.14 31 <0.001 8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.23 8 <3 120 <0.001 2.8 19 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.2 <0.002 0.25 0.008 70 240 0.011 <0.01
10/18/15 <0.005 0.0088 0.13 31 <0.001 8.6 <8 <0.01 <0.01 0.23 7.5 <3 110 <0.001 2.6 19 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.1 <0.002 0.31 0.0075 71 230 0.0011 <0.01
3/7/16 <0.005 0.011 0.14 32 <0.001 8.4 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.24 8.9 <3 120 <0.001 2.7 19 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.1 <0.002 0.227 0.0055 69 180 0.012 <0.01
4/29/16 <0.005 0.0099 0.14 30 <0.001 8.5 <8 <0.01 <0.01 0.23 10.1 <3 120 <0.001 2.8 19 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.1 <0.002 0.205 0.0079 67 250 0.012 <0.01
8/4/16 <0.005 0.0088 0.14 30 <0.001 8.1 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.24 11.2 3.72 120 <0.001 2.9 18 <0.005 18 <0.1-R 1.1 <0.002 0.27 0.0093 64 220 0.011 <0.01
9/27/16 <0.1
10/18/16 <0.005 0.008 0.1 28 <0.001 8 2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 7 <3 118 <0.001 3 18 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.2 <0.002 0.3 0.007 57 240 0.0096 <0.01
2/15/17 <0.005 0.008 <0.1 29 <0.001 8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 7.6 <3 120 <0.001 3 19 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.2 <0.002 0.5 0.006 57 230 0.0084 <0.01
5/2/17 <0.005 0.008 0.1 28 <0.001 8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 7 <2 118 <0.001 3 18 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.1 <0.002 0.9 0.006 55 240 0.0092 <0.01
7/18/17 <0.005 0.009 0.1 28 <0.001 7 2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 7.9 <3 117 <0.001 3 17 <0.005 17 <0.1 1 <0.002 0.2 0.007 54 250 0.0102 <0.01
10/31/17 <0.005 0.009 0.1 27 <0.001 9 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 7.6 <3 122 <0.001 3 17 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.1 <0.002 <0.2 0.007 57 240 0.0105 <0.01
2/20/18 <0.005 0.007 <0.1 26 <0.001 9 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6.8 <2 116 <0.001 3 17 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.1 <0.002 0.7 0.006 55 230 0.008 <0.01
4/23/18 <0.005 0.009 0.1 28 <0.001 8 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.1 <2 116 <0.001 3 17 <0.005 20 <0.1 1 <0.002 0.6 0.007 55 220 0.0097 <0.01
7/9/18 <0.005 0.007 0.1 27 <0.001 8 2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 8.9 <3 115 <0.001 3 16 <0.005 16 <0.1 1 <0.002 0.5-J 0.006 52 230 0.0092 <0.01
RM20
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Date Ag (mg/L)
As
(mg/L)
Ba
(mg/L)
Ca
(mg/L)Cd (mg/L)
Cl
(mg/L)
CO3
(mg/L)Cr (mg/L)Cu (mg/L)F (mg/L)
Gross
Alpha
(pCi/L)
Calculated
Adjusted
Gross
Alpha
(pCi/L)
HCO3
(mg/L)Hg (mg/L)
K
(mg/L)
Mg
(mg/L)
Mo
(mg/L)
Na
(mg/L)
NH3 as N
(mg/L)
NO3+NO2
as N
(mg/L)Pb (mg/L)
Ra-226
(pCi/L)
Se
(mg/L)
SO4
(mg/L)
TDS
(mg/L)
Unat
(mg/L)Zn (mg/L)
10/9/18 <0.005 0.008 0.1 29 <0.001 9 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 8.5 <2 120 <0.001 3 17 <0.005 22 <0.1 1.1 <0.002 0.3 0.006 56 230 0.01 <0.01
1/26/19 <0.005 0.008 0.1 26 <0.001 9 2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6 <2 117 <0.001 3 17 <0.005 21 <0.1 1 <0.002 2 0.005 53 250 0.01 <0.01
4/28/19 <0.005 0.009 0.1 27 <0.001 9 2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5.5 <3 117 <0.001 3 17 <0.005 18 <0.1 1 <0.002 <0.2 0.006 49 230 0.0108 <0.01
7/28/19 <0.01 0.009 0.1 26 <0.001 9 2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.8 <2 118 <0.0002 3 18 <0.01 17 <0.1 1.1 <0.002 0.2 0.006 51 220 0.0109 <0.01
11/3/19 <0.005 0.009 0.1 26 <0.001 9 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 7.6 <2 131 <0.0002 3 16 <0.005 21 <0.1 0.9 <0.002 0.2 0.007 52 230 0.0117 <0.01
2/16/20 <0.005 0.011 0.1 26 <0.001 9 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6.2 <2 118 <0.0002 3 16 <0.005 17 <0.1 0.9 <0.002 0.4 0.007 51 230 0.0119 0.01
5/24/20 <0.005 0.009 0.1 28 <0.001 9 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 4.1 <2 117 <0.0002 3 18 <0.005 18 0.1 1 <0.002 0.3 0.006 51 240 0.0108 <0.01
7/7/20 <0.005 0.012 0.2 29 <0.001 10 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 9.3 <2 118 <0.0002 2 18 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.1 <0.002 0.2 0.009 53 240 0.0156 <0.01
10/5/20 <0.005 0.009 0.1 28 <0.001 10 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 7.9 <2 118 <0.0002 4 18 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.1 <0.002 0.3 0.006 52 240 0.0119 <0.01
1/22/21 <0.005 0.01 0.1 26 <0.001 10 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 6.4 <3 116 <0.0002 3 17 <0.005 17 <0.1 1 <0.002 0.4 0.007 51 230 0.0128 <0.01
4/1/21 <0.005 0.009 0.1 26 <0.001 10 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 6.8 <2 118 <0.0002 3 17 <0.005 17 <0.1 1 <0.002 <0.2 0.006 50 230 0.0124 <0.01
7/9/21 <0.005 0.008 0.1 28 <0.001 9 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 7.2 <2 116 <0.0002 3 18 <0.005 18 <0.1 1 <0.002 <0.2 0.006 50 230 0.011 <0.01
10/3/21 <0.005 0.009 0.1 27 <0.001 10 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 6.4 <2 121 <0.0002 3 17 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.1 <0.002 0.2 0.006 52 220 0.0115 <0.01
2/5/22 <0.005 0.009 0.1 28 <0.001 10 2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 7.7 <2 119 <0.0002 3 17 <0.005 17 <0.1 1 <0.002 0.4 0.006 50 210 0.0116 <0.01
4/2/22 <0.005 0.01 0.1 26 <0.001 10 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 5 <2 125 <0.0002 3 18 <0.005 17 <0.1 1 <0.002 0.2 0.007 54 220 0.0141 <0.01
7/9/22 <0.005 0.009 0.1 29 <0.001 10 <2-J <0.01 <0.01 0.2 9.2-J <2-J 120 <0.0002 3 18 <0.005 17 <0.1 1 <0.002 <0.2 0.006 49 260 0.0109 <0.01
10/15/22 <0.005 0.008 0.1 28 <0.001 10 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.3 11 3.4 116 <0.0002 3 19 <0.005 19 <0.1 1.1 <0.002 0.3 0.006 49 260 0.0112 <0.01
3/11/23 <0.005 0.011 0.1 28 <0.001 9 <2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 11.7 2.6 113 <0.0002 2 18 <0.005 16 <0.1 1.1 <0.002 0.3 0.007 43 220 0.0134 <0.01
4/22/23 <0.005 0.01 0.1 28 <0.001 10 2 <0.01 <0.01 0.2 9.3 <2 112 <0.0002 3 18 <0.005 18 <0.1 1.1 <0.002 0.4 0.007 45 210 0.0137 <0.01
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
0.04
0.045
0.05
11
/
1
/
0
3
10
/
3
1
/
0
4
10
/
3
1
/
0
5
10
/
3
1
/
0
6
10
/
3
1
/
0
7
10
/
3
0
/
0
8
10
/
3
0
/
0
9
10
/
3
0
/
1
0
10
/
3
0
/
1
1
10
/
2
9
/
1
2
10
/
2
9
/
1
3
10
/
2
9
/
1
4
10
/
2
9
/
1
5
10
/
2
8
/
1
6
10
/
2
8
/
1
7
10
/
2
8
/
1
8
10
/
2
8
/
1
9
10
/
2
7
/
2
0
10
/
2
7
/
2
1
10
/
2
7
/
2
2
10
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ag

(
m
g
/
L
)
Year
Silver
RM1
RM2R
RM7
RM8
RM12
RM14
RM18
RM19
RM20
Open symbols indicate sample result was
below reporting limit.
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
11
/
1
/
0
3
10
/
3
1
/
0
4
10
/
3
1
/
0
5
10
/
3
1
/
0
6
10
/
3
1
/
0
7
10
/
3
0
/
0
8
10
/
3
0
/
0
9
10
/
3
0
/
1
0
10
/
3
0
/
1
1
10
/
2
9
/
1
2
10
/
2
9
/
1
3
10
/
2
9
/
1
4
10
/
2
9
/
1
5
10
/
2
8
/
1
6
10
/
2
8
/
1
7
10
/
2
8
/
1
8
10
/
2
8
/
1
9
10
/
2
7
/
2
0
10
/
2
7
/
2
1
10
/
2
7
/
2
2
10
/
2
7
/
2
3
As

(
m
g
/
L
)
Year
Arsenic
RM1
RM2R
RM7
RM8
RM12
RM14
RM18
RM19
RM20
Open symbols indicate sample result was below
reporting limit.
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
11
/
1
/
0
3
10
/
3
1
/
0
4
10
/
3
1
/
0
5
10
/
3
1
/
0
6
10
/
3
1
/
0
7
10
/
3
0
/
0
8
10
/
3
0
/
0
9
10
/
3
0
/
1
0
10
/
3
0
/
1
1
10
/
2
9
/
1
2
10
/
2
9
/
1
3
10
/
2
9
/
1
4
10
/
2
9
/
1
5
10
/
2
8
/
1
6
10
/
2
8
/
1
7
10
/
2
8
/
1
8
10
/
2
8
/
1
9
10
/
2
7
/
2
0
10
/
2
7
/
2
1
10
/
2
7
/
2
2
10
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ba

(
m
g
/
L
)
Year
Barium
RM1
RM2R
RM7
RM8
RM12
RM14
RM18
RM19
RM20
Open symbols indicate sample result was below
reporting limit.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
11
/
1
/
0
3
10
/
3
1
/
0
4
10
/
3
1
/
0
5
10
/
3
1
/
0
6
10
/
3
1
/
0
7
10
/
3
0
/
0
8
10
/
3
0
/
0
9
10
/
3
0
/
1
0
10
/
3
0
/
1
1
10
/
2
9
/
1
2
10
/
2
9
/
1
3
10
/
2
9
/
1
4
10
/
2
9
/
1
5
10
/
2
8
/
1
6
10
/
2
8
/
1
7
10
/
2
8
/
1
8
10
/
2
8
/
1
9
10
/
2
7
/
2
0
10
/
2
7
/
2
1
10
/
2
7
/
2
2
10
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ca

(
m
g
/
L
)
Year
Calcium
RM1
RM2R
RM7
RM8
RM12
RM14
RM18
RM19
RM20
Open symbols indicate sample result was
below reporting limit.
0
0.0005
0.001
0.0015
0.002
0.0025
0.003
0.0035
0.004
0.0045
0.005
11
/
1
/
0
3
10
/
3
1
/
0
4
10
/
3
1
/
0
5
10
/
3
1
/
0
6
10
/
3
1
/
0
7
10
/
3
0
/
0
8
10
/
3
0
/
0
9
10
/
3
0
/
1
0
10
/
3
0
/
1
1
10
/
2
9
/
1
2
10
/
2
9
/
1
3
10
/
2
9
/
1
4
10
/
2
9
/
1
5
10
/
2
8
/
1
6
10
/
2
8
/
1
7
10
/
2
8
/
1
8
10
/
2
8
/
1
9
10
/
2
7
/
2
0
10
/
2
7
/
2
1
10
/
2
7
/
2
2
10
/
2
7
/
2
3
Cd

(
m
g
/
L
)
Year
Cadmium
RM1
RM2R
RM7
RM8
RM12
RM14
RM18
RM19
RM20
Open symbols indicate sample result was below
reporting limit.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
11
/
1
/
0
3
10
/
3
1
/
0
4
10
/
3
1
/
0
5
10
/
3
1
/
0
6
10
/
3
1
/
0
7
10
/
3
0
/
0
8
10
/
3
0
/
0
9
10
/
3
0
/
1
0
10
/
3
0
/
1
1
10
/
2
9
/
1
2
10
/
2
9
/
1
3
10
/
2
9
/
1
4
10
/
2
9
/
1
5
10
/
2
8
/
1
6
10
/
2
8
/
1
7
10
/
2
8
/
1
8
10
/
2
8
/
1
9
10
/
2
7
/
2
0
10
/
2
7
/
2
1
10
/
2
7
/
2
2
10
/
2
7
/
2
3
Cl

(
m
g
/
L
)
Year
Chloride
RM1
RM2R
RM7
RM8
RM12
RM14
RM18
RM19
RM20
Open symbols indicate sample result was below
reporting limit.
0
5
10
15
20
25
11
/
1
/
0
3
10
/
3
1
/
0
4
10
/
3
1
/
0
5
10
/
3
1
/
0
6
10
/
3
1
/
0
7
10
/
3
0
/
0
8
10
/
3
0
/
0
9
10
/
3
0
/
1
0
10
/
3
0
/
1
1
10
/
2
9
/
1
2
10
/
2
9
/
1
3
10
/
2
9
/
1
4
10
/
2
9
/
1
5
10
/
2
8
/
1
6
10
/
2
8
/
1
7
10
/
2
8
/
1
8
10
/
2
8
/
1
9
10
/
2
7
/
2
0
10
/
2
7
/
2
1
10
/
2
7
/
2
2
10
/
2
7
/
2
3
CO
3

(
m
g
/
L
)
Year
CO3
RM1
RM2R
RM7
RM8
RM12
RM14
RM18
RM19
RM20
Open symbols indicate sample result was below
reporting limit.
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
0.04
0.045
0.05
11
/
1
/
0
3
10
/
3
1
/
0
4
10
/
3
1
/
0
5
10
/
3
1
/
0
6
10
/
3
1
/
0
7
10
/
3
0
/
0
8
10
/
3
0
/
0
9
10
/
3
0
/
1
0
10
/
3
0
/
1
1
10
/
2
9
/
1
2
10
/
2
9
/
1
3
10
/
2
9
/
1
4
10
/
2
9
/
1
5
10
/
2
8
/
1
6
10
/
2
8
/
1
7
10
/
2
8
/
1
8
10
/
2
8
/
1
9
10
/
2
7
/
2
0
10
/
2
7
/
2
1
10
/
2
7
/
2
2
10
/
2
7
/
2
3
Cr

(
m
g
/
L
)
Year
Chromium
RM1
RM2R
RM7
RM8
RM12
RM14
RM18
RM19
RM20
Open symbols indicate sample result was below
reporting limit.
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
11
/
1
/
0
3
10
/
3
1
/
0
4
10
/
3
1
/
0
5
10
/
3
1
/
0
6
10
/
3
1
/
0
7
10
/
3
0
/
0
8
10
/
3
0
/
0
9
10
/
3
0
/
1
0
10
/
3
0
/
1
1
10
/
2
9
/
1
2
10
/
2
9
/
1
3
10
/
2
9
/
1
4
10
/
2
9
/
1
5
10
/
2
8
/
1
6
10
/
2
8
/
1
7
10
/
2
8
/
1
8
10
/
2
8
/
1
9
10
/
2
7
/
2
0
10
/
2
7
/
2
1
10
/
2
7
/
2
2
10
/
2
7
/
2
3
Cu

(
m
g
/
L
)
Year
Copper
RM1
RM2R
RM7
RM8
RM12
RM14
RM18
RM19
RM20
Open symbols indicate sample result was below
reporting limit.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
11
/
1
/
0
3
10
/
3
1
/
0
4
10
/
3
1
/
0
5
10
/
3
1
/
0
6
10
/
3
1
/
0
7
10
/
3
0
/
0
8
10
/
3
0
/
0
9
10
/
3
0
/
1
0
10
/
3
0
/
1
1
10
/
2
9
/
1
2
10
/
2
9
/
1
3
10
/
2
9
/
1
4
10
/
2
9
/
1
5
10
/
2
8
/
1
6
10
/
2
8
/
1
7
10
/
2
8
/
1
8
10
/
2
8
/
1
9
10
/
2
7
/
2
0
10
/
2
7
/
2
1
10
/
2
7
/
2
2
10
/
2
7
/
2
3
F
(
m
g
/
L
)
Year
Fluoride
RM1
RM2R
RM7
RM8
RM12
RM14
RM18
RM19
RM20
Open symbols indicate sample result was below
reporting limit.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
11
/
1
/
0
3
10
/
3
1
/
0
4
10
/
3
1
/
0
5
10
/
3
1
/
0
6
10
/
3
1
/
0
7
10
/
3
0
/
0
8
10
/
3
0
/
0
9
10
/
3
0
/
1
0
10
/
3
0
/
1
1
10
/
2
9
/
1
2
10
/
2
9
/
1
3
10
/
2
9
/
1
4
10
/
2
9
/
1
5
10
/
2
8
/
1
6
10
/
2
8
/
1
7
10
/
2
8
/
1
8
10
/
2
8
/
1
9
10
/
2
7
/
2
0
10
/
2
7
/
2
1
10
/
2
7
/
2
2
10
/
2
7
/
2
3
Gr
o
s
s

A
l
p
h
a

(
p
C
i
/
L
)
Year
Gross Alpha
RM1
RM2R
RM7
RM8
RM12
RM14
RM18
RM19
RM20
Open symbols indicate sample result was below
reporting limit.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
11
/
1
/
0
3
10
/
3
1
/
0
4
10
/
3
1
/
0
5
10
/
3
1
/
0
6
10
/
3
1
/
0
7
10
/
3
0
/
0
8
10
/
3
0
/
0
9
10
/
3
0
/
1
0
10
/
3
0
/
1
1
10
/
2
9
/
1
2
10
/
2
9
/
1
3
10
/
2
9
/
1
4
10
/
2
9
/
1
5
10
/
2
8
/
1
6
10
/
2
8
/
1
7
10
/
2
8
/
1
8
10
/
2
8
/
1
9
10
/
2
7
/
2
0
10
/
2
7
/
2
1
10
/
2
7
/
2
2
10
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ca
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d

A
d
j
u
s
t
e
d

G
r
o
s
s

A
l
p
h
a

(
p
C
i
/
L
)
Year
Calculated Adjusted Gross Alpha
RM1
RM2R
RM7
RM8
RM12
RM14
RM18
RM19
RM20
Open symbols indicate sample result was below
reporting limit.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
11
/
1
/
0
3
10
/
3
1
/
0
4
10
/
3
1
/
0
5
10
/
3
1
/
0
6
10
/
3
1
/
0
7
10
/
3
0
/
0
8
10
/
3
0
/
0
9
10
/
3
0
/
1
0
10
/
3
0
/
1
1
10
/
2
9
/
1
2
10
/
2
9
/
1
3
10
/
2
9
/
1
4
10
/
2
9
/
1
5
10
/
2
8
/
1
6
10
/
2
8
/
1
7
10
/
2
8
/
1
8
10
/
2
8
/
1
9
10
/
2
7
/
2
0
10
/
2
7
/
2
1
10
/
2
7
/
2
2
10
/
2
7
/
2
3
HC
O
3

(
m
g
/
L
)
Year
HCO3
RM1
RM2R
RM7
RM8
RM12
RM14
RM18
RM19
RM20
Open symbols indicate sample result was below
reporting limit.
0
0.0005
0.001
0.0015
0.002
0.0025
0.003
11
/
1
/
0
3
10
/
3
1
/
0
4
10
/
3
1
/
0
5
10
/
3
1
/
0
6
10
/
3
1
/
0
7
10
/
3
0
/
0
8
10
/
3
0
/
0
9
10
/
3
0
/
1
0
10
/
3
0
/
1
1
10
/
2
9
/
1
2
10
/
2
9
/
1
3
10
/
2
9
/
1
4
10
/
2
9
/
1
5
10
/
2
8
/
1
6
10
/
2
8
/
1
7
10
/
2
8
/
1
8
10
/
2
8
/
1
9
10
/
2
7
/
2
0
10
/
2
7
/
2
1
10
/
2
7
/
2
2
10
/
2
7
/
2
3
Hg

(
m
g
/
L
)
Year
Mercury
RM1
RM2R
RM7
RM8
RM12
RM14
RM18
RM19
RM20
Open symbols indicate sample result was below
reporting limit.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
11
/
1
/
0
3
10
/
3
1
/
0
4
10
/
3
1
/
0
5
10
/
3
1
/
0
6
10
/
3
1
/
0
7
10
/
3
0
/
0
8
10
/
3
0
/
0
9
10
/
3
0
/
1
0
10
/
3
0
/
1
1
10
/
2
9
/
1
2
10
/
2
9
/
1
3
10
/
2
9
/
1
4
10
/
2
9
/
1
5
10
/
2
8
/
1
6
10
/
2
8
/
1
7
10
/
2
8
/
1
8
10
/
2
8
/
1
9
10
/
2
7
/
2
0
10
/
2
7
/
2
1
10
/
2
7
/
2
2
10
/
2
7
/
2
3
K
(
m
g
/
L
)
Year
Potassium
RM1
RM2R
RM7
RM8
RM12
RM14
RM18
RM19
RM20
Open symbols indicate sample result was below
reporting limit.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
11
/
1
/
0
3
10
/
3
1
/
0
4
10
/
3
1
/
0
5
10
/
3
1
/
0
6
10
/
3
1
/
0
7
10
/
3
0
/
0
8
10
/
3
0
/
0
9
10
/
3
0
/
1
0
10
/
3
0
/
1
1
10
/
2
9
/
1
2
10
/
2
9
/
1
3
10
/
2
9
/
1
4
10
/
2
9
/
1
5
10
/
2
8
/
1
6
10
/
2
8
/
1
7
10
/
2
8
/
1
8
10
/
2
8
/
1
9
10
/
2
7
/
2
0
10
/
2
7
/
2
1
10
/
2
7
/
2
2
10
/
2
7
/
2
3
Mg

(
m
g
/
L
)
Year
Magnesium
RM1
RM2R
RM7
RM8
RM12
RM14
RM18
RM19
RM20
Open symbols indicate sample result was below
reporting limit.
0
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.005
0.006
0.007
0.008
0.009
0.01
11
/
1
/
0
3
10
/
3
1
/
0
4
10
/
3
1
/
0
5
10
/
3
1
/
0
6
10
/
3
1
/
0
7
10
/
3
0
/
0
8
10
/
3
0
/
0
9
10
/
3
0
/
1
0
10
/
3
0
/
1
1
10
/
2
9
/
1
2
10
/
2
9
/
1
3
10
/
2
9
/
1
4
10
/
2
9
/
1
5
10
/
2
8
/
1
6
10
/
2
8
/
1
7
10
/
2
8
/
1
8
10
/
2
8
/
1
9
10
/
2
7
/
2
0
10
/
2
7
/
2
1
10
/
2
7
/
2
2
10
/
2
7
/
2
3
Mo

(
m
g
/
L
)
Year
Molybdenum
RM1
RM2R
RM7
RM8
RM12
RM14
RM18
RM19
RM20
Open symbols indicate sample result was below
reporting limit.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
11
/
1
/
0
3
10
/
3
1
/
0
4
10
/
3
1
/
0
5
10
/
3
1
/
0
6
10
/
3
1
/
0
7
10
/
3
0
/
0
8
10
/
3
0
/
0
9
10
/
3
0
/
1
0
10
/
3
0
/
1
1
10
/
2
9
/
1
2
10
/
2
9
/
1
3
10
/
2
9
/
1
4
10
/
2
9
/
1
5
10
/
2
8
/
1
6
10
/
2
8
/
1
7
10
/
2
8
/
1
8
10
/
2
8
/
1
9
10
/
2
7
/
2
0
10
/
2
7
/
2
1
10
/
2
7
/
2
2
10
/
2
7
/
2
3
Na

(
m
g
/
L
)
Year
Sodium
RM1
RM2R
RM7
RM8
RM12
RM14
RM18
RM19
RM20
Open symbols indicate sample result was below
reporting limit.
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
11
/
1
/
0
3
10
/
3
1
/
0
4
10
/
3
1
/
0
5
10
/
3
1
/
0
6
10
/
3
1
/
0
7
10
/
3
0
/
0
8
10
/
3
0
/
0
9
10
/
3
0
/
1
0
10
/
3
0
/
1
1
10
/
2
9
/
1
2
10
/
2
9
/
1
3
10
/
2
9
/
1
4
10
/
2
9
/
1
5
10
/
2
8
/
1
6
10
/
2
8
/
1
7
10
/
2
8
/
1
8
10
/
2
8
/
1
9
10
/
2
7
/
2
0
10
/
2
7
/
2
1
10
/
2
7
/
2
2
10
/
2
7
/
2
3
NH
3

(
m
g
/
L
)
Year
Ammonia
RM1
RM2R
RM7
RM8
RM12
RM14
RM18
RM19
RM20
Open symbols indicate sample result was below
reporting limit.
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
11
/
1
/
0
3
10
/
3
1
/
0
4
10
/
3
1
/
0
5
10
/
3
1
/
0
6
10
/
3
1
/
0
7
10
/
3
0
/
0
8
10
/
3
0
/
0
9
10
/
3
0
/
1
0
10
/
3
0
/
1
1
10
/
2
9
/
1
2
10
/
2
9
/
1
3
10
/
2
9
/
1
4
10
/
2
9
/
1
5
10
/
2
8
/
1
6
10
/
2
8
/
1
7
10
/
2
8
/
1
8
10
/
2
8
/
1
9
10
/
2
7
/
2
0
10
/
2
7
/
2
1
10
/
2
7
/
2
2
10
/
2
7
/
2
3
NO
2
+
N
O
3

(
m
g
/
L
)
Year
NO2+NO3 as N
RM1
RM2R
RM7
RM8
RM12
RM14
RM18
RM19
RM20
Open symbols indicate sample result was below
reporting limit.
0
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.005
0.006
0.007
0.008
0.009
11
/
1
/
0
3
10
/
3
1
/
0
4
10
/
3
1
/
0
5
10
/
3
1
/
0
6
10
/
3
1
/
0
7
10
/
3
0
/
0
8
10
/
3
0
/
0
9
10
/
3
0
/
1
0
10
/
3
0
/
1
1
10
/
2
9
/
1
2
10
/
2
9
/
1
3
10
/
2
9
/
1
4
10
/
2
9
/
1
5
10
/
2
8
/
1
6
10
/
2
8
/
1
7
10
/
2
8
/
1
8
10
/
2
8
/
1
9
10
/
2
7
/
2
0
10
/
2
7
/
2
1
10
/
2
7
/
2
2
10
/
2
7
/
2
3
Pb

(
m
g
/
L
)
Year
Lead
RM1
RM2R
RM7
RM8
RM12
RM14
RM18
RM19
RM20
Open symbols indicate sample result was below
reporting limit.
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
11
/
1
/
0
3
10
/
3
1
/
0
4
10
/
3
1
/
0
5
10
/
3
1
/
0
6
10
/
3
1
/
0
7
10
/
3
0
/
0
8
10
/
3
0
/
0
9
10
/
3
0
/
1
0
10
/
3
0
/
1
1
10
/
2
9
/
1
2
10
/
2
9
/
1
3
10
/
2
9
/
1
4
10
/
2
9
/
1
5
10
/
2
8
/
1
6
10
/
2
8
/
1
7
10
/
2
8
/
1
8
10
/
2
8
/
1
9
10
/
2
7
/
2
0
10
/
2
7
/
2
1
10
/
2
7
/
2
2
10
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
2
2
6

(
p
C
i
/
L
)
Year
Ra226
RM1
RM2R
RM7
RM8
RM12
RM14
RM18
RM19
RM20
Open symbols indicate sample result was below
reporting limit.
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
0.04
0.045
0.05
11
/
1
/
0
3
10
/
3
1
/
0
4
10
/
3
1
/
0
5
10
/
3
1
/
0
6
10
/
3
1
/
0
7
10
/
3
0
/
0
8
10
/
3
0
/
0
9
10
/
3
0
/
1
0
10
/
3
0
/
1
1
10
/
2
9
/
1
2
10
/
2
9
/
1
3
10
/
2
9
/
1
4
10
/
2
9
/
1
5
10
/
2
8
/
1
6
10
/
2
8
/
1
7
10
/
2
8
/
1
8
10
/
2
8
/
1
9
10
/
2
7
/
2
0
10
/
2
7
/
2
1
10
/
2
7
/
2
2
10
/
2
7
/
2
3
Se

(
m
g
/
L
)
Year
Selenium
RM1
RM2R
RM7
RM8
RM12
RM14
RM18
RM19
RM20
Open symbols indicate sample result was below
reporting limit.
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
11
/
1
/
0
3
10
/
3
1
/
0
4
10
/
3
1
/
0
5
10
/
3
1
/
0
6
10
/
3
1
/
0
7
10
/
3
0
/
0
8
10
/
3
0
/
0
9
10
/
3
0
/
1
0
10
/
3
0
/
1
1
10
/
2
9
/
1
2
10
/
2
9
/
1
3
10
/
2
9
/
1
4
10
/
2
9
/
1
5
10
/
2
8
/
1
6
10
/
2
8
/
1
7
10
/
2
8
/
1
8
10
/
2
8
/
1
9
10
/
2
7
/
2
0
10
/
2
7
/
2
1
10
/
2
7
/
2
2
10
/
2
7
/
2
3
SO
4

(
m
g
/
L
)
Year
Sulfate
RM1
RM2R
RM7
RM8
RM12
RM14
RM18
RM19
RM20
Open symbols indicate sample result was below
reporting limit.
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
275
300
325
350
375
400
425
450
475
500
525
550
575
600
11
/
1
/
0
3
10
/
3
1
/
0
4
10
/
3
1
/
0
5
10
/
3
1
/
0
6
10
/
3
1
/
0
7
10
/
3
0
/
0
8
10
/
3
0
/
0
9
10
/
3
0
/
1
0
10
/
3
0
/
1
1
10
/
2
9
/
1
2
10
/
2
9
/
1
3
10
/
2
9
/
1
4
10
/
2
9
/
1
5
10
/
2
8
/
1
6
10
/
2
8
/
1
7
10
/
2
8
/
1
8
10
/
2
8
/
1
9
10
/
2
7
/
2
0
10
/
2
7
/
2
1
10
/
2
7
/
2
2
10
/
2
7
/
2
3
TD
S

(
m
g
/
L
)
Year
Total Dissolved Solids
RM1
RM2R
RM7
RM8
RM12
RM14
RM18
RM19
RM20
Open symbols indicate sample result was below
reporting limit.
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
11
/
1
/
0
3
10
/
3
1
/
0
4
10
/
3
1
/
0
5
10
/
3
1
/
0
6
10
/
3
1
/
0
7
10
/
3
0
/
0
8
10
/
3
0
/
0
9
10
/
3
0
/
1
0
10
/
3
0
/
1
1
10
/
2
9
/
1
2
10
/
2
9
/
1
3
10
/
2
9
/
1
4
10
/
2
9
/
1
5
10
/
2
8
/
1
6
10
/
2
8
/
1
7
10
/
2
8
/
1
8
10
/
2
8
/
1
9
10
/
2
7
/
2
0
10
/
2
7
/
2
1
10
/
2
7
/
2
2
10
/
2
7
/
2
3
Un
a
t

(
m
g
/
L
)
Year
Uranium
RM1
RM2R
RM7
RM8
RM12
RM14
RM18
RM19
RM20
Open symbols indicate sample result was below
reporting limit.
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
11
/
1
/
0
3
10
/
3
1
/
0
4
10
/
3
1
/
0
5
10
/
3
1
/
0
6
10
/
3
1
/
0
7
10
/
3
0
/
0
8
10
/
3
0
/
0
9
10
/
3
0
/
1
0
10
/
3
0
/
1
1
10
/
2
9
/
1
2
10
/
2
9
/
1
3
10
/
2
9
/
1
4
10
/
2
9
/
1
5
10
/
2
8
/
1
6
10
/
2
8
/
1
7
10
/
2
8
/
1
8
10
/
2
8
/
1
9
10
/
2
7
/
2
0
10
/
2
7
/
2
1
10
/
2
7
/
2
2
10
/
2
7
/
2
3
Zn

(
m
g
/
L
)
Year
Zinc
RM1
RM2R
RM7
RM8
RM12
RM14
RM18
RM19
RM20
Open symbols indicate sample result was below
reporting limit.

Office Address:
10708 S. River Front Parkway
Suite 321
South Jordan, Utah 84095

Office: 385.246.1250
Fax: [phone]

ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.
AR
HC
February 23, 2024

Mr. Doug Hansen, Director
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control
195 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84116
Re: Radioactive Materials License UT0900480, Effluent Monitoring Report Second Half 2023
Dear Director Hansen:
As required by Radioactive Materials License UT0900480 License Condition 12.2, Anfield Resources
Holding Corp. is submitting the Effluent Monitoring for the Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Second
Half 2023 (July 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023). Results of all effluent monitoring are reported in
accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 40.65 incorporated by reference in UAD R313-24-3 and UAC
R313-17-2.
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direct
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and
evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the persons who manage the system, or those
persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Should you have any questions in regard to this matter, please contact Corey Dias at [phone] or e-
mail at [e-mail].
Sincerely,

Joshua Bleak
Director
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility

cc: Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility file

ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING
CORP.

SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM FACILITY
EFFLUENT REPORT
SECOND HALF 2023

FEBRUARY 2024

Submitted by

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

Second Half 2023 Effluent Report i
TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1
2.0 AIR SAMPLING ............................................................................................................................ 1
3.0 SUPPLEMENTAL NOTES .......................................................................................................... 2
4.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS ............................................................................. 2
5.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS ....................................................................................................... 2

EXHIBIT

EXHIBIT A Supporting Documentation

Second Half 2023 Effluent Report 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This Effluent Monitoring Report is presented to comply with Utah Department of Environmental
Quality, Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control requirements (UAC R313-24-3),
10 CFR 40.65, and License Conditions 11.3 and 12.2 of Radioactive Material License
#UT0900480. The current Licensee is Anfield Resources Holding Corp. (Anfield).

The sampling data represent the period from July 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023 for the
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility (Facility). License requirements reflect the current standby
status of the Facility.

2.0 AIR SAMPLING

The license requires one 20-hour to 24-hour sampling period each calendar quarter with the filters
composited and analyzed for natural uranium and radium-226 on a semi-annual basis (License
Condition 11.2, Table 5.5-8). The dates of collection during the second half of 2023 were
September 5 through September 6 and November 16 through 17. The sampler (AP-3) is located
downwind of the tailings facility. Supporting documentation for this report is attached as Exhibit
A.

The samples were obtained using a Staplex High Volume Air Sampler model TFIA. The Staplex
sampler is rated for 0-70 cubic feet per minute (cfm) [0-2 cubic meters per minute]. Calibration of
the Staplex was performed by IML Air Science. The certificate in provided in Exhibit A. The actual
flow rate for the sampling period was calculated using a spreadsheet provided by IML Air Science
and included in Exhibit A.

The flow rate was multiplied by the elapsed time to obtain the volume of air sampled for each of
the two sampling periods. The volumes were added to obtain the total semi-annual sample volume.

The total volume of air sampled in the third quarter 2023 was 3.72 x 109 ml with an average flow
rate of 2.10 x 106 ml/minute. The total volume of air sampled in the fourth quarter 2023 was 2.23
x 109 ml with an average flow rate of 1.30 x 106 ml/minute. The total volume sampled for the two
quarterly periods was 5.95 x 109 ml. The average flow rate was 1.70 x 106 ml/minute (58.14 cfm).
The total sampling time was 3488.40 minutes (58.14 hours).

The results of the sample analyses are given in the following table:

Air Sample Results
Radionuclide Concentration
(µCi/ml)
Error Estimate
(µCi/ml)
Lower Limit of
Detection
(µCi/ml)
% Effluent
Concentration
Limit
Natural Uranium <3.40 x 10-17 N/A 3.36 x 10-17 0.0
Radium-226 2.69 x 10-16 3.40 x 10-17 3.40 x 10-17 0.03

Second Half 2023 Effluent Report 2

3.0 SUPPLEMENTAL NOTES

a. The percent Effluent Concentration Limit column for the air sample results refers to the 10
CFR 20, Appendix B, Table 2, Effluent Concentration Limits for unrestricted areas.

Nuclide Effluent Concentration Limit
for Air
(µCi/ml)
Effluent Concentration Limit
for Water
(µCi/ml)
Natural Uranium, Class Y 9 x 10-14 3 x 10-7
Radium-226 9 x 10-13 6 x 10-8

b. The airborne particulate sampler is operated for a minimum of 20 hours (1200 minutes)
each calendar quarter. The two quarterly samples were digested together and a semi-annual
value was determined.

c. The filters were analyzed by Pace Laboratory in Sheridan, Wyoming. The laboratory
reports concentrations, estimated uncertainties and minimum detectable concentration.
The error limit (uncertainty) for radium-226 was 0.20 pCi/filter (3.4 x10-17 µCi/ml) for the
second half 2023 air sample results. Error limits are not reported for natural uranium
analyses.

4.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS

The radioactive materials license condition 11.3A requires the following wells to be sampled on a
semi-annual basis: RM1, RM2R, RM7, RM12, RM14, RM18, and RM19. RM1 and RM12 are
the upgradient monitoring wells and represent the site background. Anfield has voluntarily
sampled wells RM8 and RM20 and reports these data semi-annually. Quarterly samples are
collected as part of the on-going accelerated background monitoring program as per Ground Water
Quality Discharge Permit UGW170003. Groundwater samples are collected from monitoring wells
following the Groundwater Quality Assurance Plan for the Facility.

Third quarter 2023 sampling was performed on July 14 and 15, 2023. Fourth quarter 2023 sampling
was performed on November 5, 2023.

License Condition 11.3B references the standards in the Utah Administrative Code (UAC) R313-
24-4. This section of the UAC references the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), specifically 10
CFR Part 40, Appendix A but explicitly replaces Criterion 5B(1) through 5H, which includes the
ground water protection standards, with the ground water standards in UAC R317-6. No
constituents in the approved monitoring program exceeded any of the Ground Water Quality
Standards in Table 1 of the Ground Water Discharge Permit (R317-6-2) in the second half of 2023.
Results of ground water sample analyses will be submitted with the Annual Groundwater
Monitoring Report 2023.

5.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

No airborne effluent concentration limits or groundwater threshold values, in the upper most
aquifer, were exceeded in the second half of 2023. A review of current and past data does not
reveal any confirmed trends as results are near analytical lower limits of detection and currently

Second Half 2023 Effluent Report 3

less than one percent of the effluent concentration limits listed in 10 CFR 20, Appendix B Table 2
for air. Groundwater concentrations reported from wells in the upper most aquifer generally are
within the magnitude of the random variations that have been historically observed in the
groundwater data as reported in the Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report.

Second Half 2023 Effluent Report

EXHIBIT A
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

LAB USE ONLY- AffiK Workorder/Login Label Here or List Pace Workotder Number or
MTJL Log-in Number HereCHAIIM-OF-CUSTODY Analytical Request Document
^ceAnalyticar
Chain of Custody is a LEGAL DOCUIVIENI' - Complete all relevent fields
Billing Information:
on rile
ompany:ALL SHADED AREAS are for LAB USE ONLYAnfield Resources
Container Presei'iiativeType **Lab Project Manager:d dr e s s :2 2 7 J e f f e r s o n S t . F t C o ll i n s . C O
E m a il T o:e p ort T o :P re s e rv a tiv e T y p e s; (1) nitri c a cid, (2) s ulfuric a cid, (3) hydrochloric a cid, (< )s . di e m hyr ro*i d e (F | z in c a c e t a t e ,
b m e ih a n l,( )s d h ni bisu f a t e , (a j S "r)ic mt P i o sul'a i.e , (t) hw a n s 'A ,‘a s c e riiic a cid, (") a rrmo niun su'a i e ,
((.) a r rtioniu m fy dr j id e , ID'F S P 'L ) Ur I e r e r e t (O 'O th e r
wri g h t e n v @ g m a il .c o mToby W ri g h t
S t e C o l l e ction In f o/A d dr e ss:
S ho o t a rlr,,, C a ny.n fvlill
d p y T o :a pril @ t wri g h t .c o m L a b P rofil e /Lin e :A n a ly s e s
u stom e r P roj e c t N a m e /N um b er:S t a t e : C o u nt y/C it/:
U T /T i c a b o o
T im e Z o n e C oll e c t e d :
I |P T ^/IM T , I C T I l E T
L a b S a m pl e R e c e ipt C h e c k l is t:
B h o o t a 'irg C a n y o n M i ll A P -3 C us t.cly S e a l s P rc s o n t/l nt a c t Y N
C u s t e c'- S i gru t u ro f
C cl l e c .;f c S irn a turo E t e s e n^
F &''t i e s Ir c f t
C orr e c* F e tt l e s
S u: c .i e rt V o U-u m o
S a m p l e s R e cff '\»e a o.' Ic e
V c A - htffc is pnc e A c c e pt a bl e
U S C i' R e g u x a t c cl S o ils
S a m pl e s in H oi ‘in g T im e
K o sic lu a i C l U o cin e P i e s e n t
e l S trip s;
1 N t A
N N A
3 N N A
\ N f A
y N N A
3 N N A
i N N A
N H 'A
'I N
V N N A
S a m pl e p H A r c e pt e l l e
p H S trip s:
Y N MA
S u lfid e P r e s e n t
L e a d i .e e t a t o S tri p s *
Y M N A
S it e/F a d lit yl D II:C o m p li a n c e M o n itori n g,
H K V e s I I N o
h o n e : 4 3 5-6 33-3 0 3 5
m a il: i a mly a m orrill @ y a h oo ,co m
P urc h a s e O rd e r H :
Q u o t e ff: o n fir e
D V l P W S I D If:
D W L o c a tio n C o d e :
b ll e c t e d B y (prin t):
.a l V 'iy a N ’orril l
im m e d i a t e ly P a ck e d o n Ic e :o ll e ct e d B y J a g n a tL jr e ):T urn aro u n d D a t e R e q uir e d :1
I I Y e s I I N o
F i e ld F ilt er e d (ii a p plic a bl e ):
I I Y e s I I N o
R u sh:a m p l e D is po s a l .
^ ispc is^. s a p'^ropri a e I Ik e tur,
I Arc h' c . _
1 H old , _
( S 'r: e D z y I i N e rt D a y
I 3 D c y 1 I 4 D a y | | f D a y
(e xp e dit e rl ar,i e s A pply)
1 U D a y A n a ly sis :
M a trix C od e s (In s e rtin M a tri x b o x b e lo w): D ri nkirg W a t er (D W), G ro u n d w a t er (G W ), W a s w a t r W W ),
Pro d u ct ,f I, S oil/S olic (S L) C il (01 ), W ip e (W P ). A ir (A R), T ii su e (V S ,, B i o a s s a y (B ', V a p or f V ), O t f e r (O '.); C O M a U S E C NIi Y :
L a b S a mpl e ii / C omm e nt s:C N ,H ofComp /C oll e ct e d (or
C om p o s it e S t a rt)
R e s 1 C M 03Composite E nd C tns !M a tri x 'ii sto m e r S a mp l e ID G r a b C l C
=3DateTimeDateTime1 z ;9/5/2 ?9/6/2 3Ird q u a i t e r fill e r i nth q u a rt e r 1 1 /1 6/2 1 1/1 7 /2filter
1—
L a b S a mpl e T e m p e r a ture I n fo :
T e mp B l a n k 'e c e i v e d:
T h erm i D ft:
Y
C ool e r j T e m p U p o n R e c e ip t:
C ool e r j T h e rm C err. F a ct or;,
C ool e r 1 C orr e ct e d T e mp :
N
C o m m e nts ;
S H O R T H O L D S P R E S E N T (<7 ?h0 U 's): Y N N /AType of Ic e U s e d: W e t B l u e Dry N on eI H om e , P.i rt'a .k! / S p <c:l C o e d L e n s/P os s ib l e H a z ard s:
jmb i n e filt e rb N APacni“g M a t e ri a l L s e d :L a b T r a c k r e H :
c Cend r e su lts, t o wrig ht e n v @ g m a ll .co m
imi;a m orri " @ y a h oo.o o m a n d a pril @ twright.c-m S a m pl e s r e c e iv e d vi a :
F l D E X u p s C li e nt C o ri e r P a c e C o i ri ero o C
R a dch e m s a m pl e(s) s cre e n e d (<5 00 c f rr,:I N A o C
M T J L L A B U S E O N L YReceived by/C o m p a n y: (S g n a t ur e)D a t e A i m e :e linquis h e d by/C o m p a n y: (S g n a tur e)
/(t M f i f a M 0r^\! l i U o Jelinquishea by/C o m p a ny: (S ig n a t ur e ) D a s e /T it/e
D a t e A im e ;
/L 'U /„/i) O S H T a bl e H :f-W A c e tn u m :
T e mpl a t e :
Pr e lo gin :
R e c e iv e d by/C o m p a n y: (S g n a t ur e)D a t e /tim e :T ri p B l a n k R e c e iv e d: Y N N A
H C L M e O H T S P O th er
D a t e/T im e :e lin q u is h e d b y/C o m p a ny: (S ig n a t ur e )D a t e /T im e :R e c e iv e d by/C o m p a n y: (S g n a t ur e)P M:N on C o nf orm a nc e (s):
v c c / w n
P a g e:
of:n o .
DC#_Title: ENV-FRM-SHRT-0033 v02_Condition Upon Receipt Form Terra Lab
Effective Date: 4/24/2023
Survey Meter # Model: 12SA SN: 136491
pH strip lot # HC325179
Thermometer SN# 27130475
Condition Upon Receipt (Attach to COC)
Sample Receipt
1 Number of ice chests/packages received:
Note as "OTC "if samples are received over the counter, unpackaged
2 Temperature of cooler/samples, (if more than e coolers, obtain an additional CUR form.)
Temps Observed (°C):
Temps Corrected (°C):
Acceptable is: 0.1" to 10"C for Bacteria; and 0.1° to 6°C for most other water parameters. Samples may not have had adequate time to cool
following collection. Indicate ROI (Received on Ice) for iced samples received on the same day as sampled, in addition to temperature at receipt.
1 ROI? Yes
Client contact for temperatures outside method criteria must be documented below.
3 Emission rate of samples for radiochemical analyses < O.SmR/hr?
4 COC Number (If applicable):
5 Do the number of bottles agree with the COC?
6 Were the samples received Intact? (no broken boWes, leaks, etc.)
7 Were the sample custody seals intact?
8 Is the COC properly completed, legible, and signed?
Sample Verification. Labeling & Distribution
1 Were all requested analyses understood and appropriate?
2 Did the bottle labels correspond with the COC information?
3 Samples collected in method-prescribed containers?
4 Sample Preservation:
pH at Receipt:
Total Metals
DIss Metals
Nutrient
Cyanide
Sulfide
Phenol
SDWA Rads
5 VOA vials have <6mm headspace?
6 Were all analyses within holding time at the time of receipt?
7 Have rush or project due dates been checked and accepted?
8 Do samples require subcontracted analyses?
If "Yes", which type of subcontracting is required?
Sample Receipt, Verification, Login, Labeling & Distribution completed by (initials):
N/ANo&
No N/A
No N/A
Yes No
No
No
Final pH (if added in lab):
Total Metals
Diss Metals
Nutrient
Preservative/Lot#
HNO3
Filtered and preserved in metals
H2SO4
NaOH
Date/Ti
Filtered a
Cyanide
Sulfide
Phenol
ZnAcet
H2SO4
HNOa.SDWA Rads
(&>Yes No
No
Yes
Yes
No
(Si>
General
Customer-Sp^^ied
4
of
70
I fdc.
me Added:
nd preserved in metals
Certified
Set ID:
Discrepancy Documentation (use back of sheet for notes on discrepancies)
Any items listed above with a response of "No" or do not meet specifications must be resolved.
Method of Contact:Person Contacted:Phone:
Date/Time:Initiated By^
Problem:
Email:
Resolution:
Qualtrax ID: 70962 Pace® Analytical Services, LLC Page 1 of 1
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
6DPSOHUGTXDUWHU WKTXDUWHUZDVUHFHLYHGRQ1RYHPEHU
$OOVDPSOHVZHUHUHFHLYHGDQGDQDO\]HGZLWKLQWKHUHFRPPHQGHGKROGLQJWLPHVH[FHSWWKRVHQRWHGEHORZLQWKLVFDVH
QDUUDWLYH6DPSOHVZHUHDQDO\]HGXVLQJWKHPHWKRGVRXWOLQHGLQWKHIROORZLQJUHIHUHQFHV
15&UDGLRORJLFDODLUSDUWLFXODWHILOWHUVDQLPDOYHJHWDWLRQVRLODQGVHGLPHQWVDPSOHVPD\EHFRPSRVLWHGE\GDWHDQG
ORFDWLRQSHUFOLHQW¶VPRQLWRULQJSURJUDPUHTXLUHPHQWV+LJKO\FDUERQDFHRXVVDPSOHVPD\UHTXLUHDVKLQJ6DPSOHVDUH
VXEMHFWHGWRDPRGLILHG86(3$6:0HWKRG%PLQHUDODFLGGLJHVWLRQDVDSSURSULDWH$QDO\VLVRIWKHUHVXOWLQJ
VROXWLRQVDQGGLJHVWDWHVLVSHUIRUPHGXVLQJDSSURYHG71,86(3$DQGLQGXVWU\UHFRJQL]HGDQDO\WLFDOWHFKQLTXHV:KHUH
FOLHQWSURYLGHGDLUYROXPHVFRUUHVSRQGLQJWRWKHDLUILOWHUFRPSRVLWHVH[LVWDTXHRXVGLJHVWDWHUHVXOWVDUHFRQYHUWHGWR
UDGLRORJLFDOSDUWLFXODWHFRQFHQWUDWLRQVLQDLUHJ—&LP/4XDOLW\FRQWUROSDUDPHWHUVDFFHSWDQFHFULWHULDDUHGHILQHGE\
86(3$SURJUDPVDQGLQ8615&5HJXODWRU\*XLGH5DGLRORJLFDO(IIOXHQWDQG(QYLURQPHQWDO0RQLWRULQJDW8UDQLXP
0LOOV8615&5HJXODWRU\*XLGH4XDOLW\$VVXUDQFHIRU5DGLRORJLFDO0RQLWRULQJ3URJUDPV±(IIOXHQW6WUHDPVDQGWKH
(QYLURQPHQWWKH71,6WDQGDUG(/9DQG3DFH$QDO\WLFDO)RUPHUO\,QWHU0RXQWDLQ/DERUDWRULHVLQWHUQDOTXDOLW\
SURFHGXUHV
$OO4XDOLW\&RQWUROSDUDPHWHUVPHWWKHDFFHSWDQFHFULWHULDGHILQHGE\(3$15&JXLGDQFHDQG3DFH$QDO\WLFDO)RUPHUO\
,QWHU0RXQWDLQ/DERUDWRULHVH[FHSWDVLQGLFDWHGLQWKLVFDVHQDUUDWLYH
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO$3
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLURQPHQWDO6HUYLFHV,Q
/DE2UGHU6
&$6(1$55$7,9(
5HSRUW,'6
:DGH1LHXZVPD/DERUDWRU\2SHUDWLRQV0DQDJHU
(QWLUH5HSRUW5HYLHZHGE\
3DJHRI
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
'HILQLWLRQV
5/ 5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW
4XDOLILHUV

9DOXHH[FHHGV0D[LPXP&RQWDPLQDQW/HYHO
$&KHFN06$VSHFLILFDWLRQV
%$QDO\WHGHWHFWHGLQWKHDVVRFLDWHG0HWKRG%ODQN
&&DOFXODWHG9DOXH
'5HSRUWOLPLWUDLVHGGXHWRGLOXWLRQ
(9DOXHDERYHTXDQWLWDWLRQUDQJH
*$QDO\]HGDW3DFH*LOOHWWH:<ODERUDWRU\
++ROGLQJWLPHVIRUSUHSDUDWLRQRUDQDO\VLVH[FHHGHG
-$QDO\WHGHWHFWHGEHORZTXDQWLWDWLRQOLPLWV
/$QDO\]HGE\DQRWKHUODERUDWRU\
09DOXHH[FHHGV0RQWKO\$YHRU0&/RULVOHVVWKDQ/&/
16DPSOHDQDO\]HGRXWVLGHRIFRPSOLDQFHUHTXLUHPHQWV
1' 1RW'HWHFWHGDWWKH5HSRUWLQJ/LPLW
22XWVLGHWKH5DQJHRI'LOXWLRQV
36DPSOHSUHVHUYHGLQODEDWWLPHRIUHFHLSW
553'RXWVLGHDFFHSWHGUHFRYHU\OLPLWV
66SLNH5HFRYHU\RXWVLGHDFFHSWHGUHFRYHU\OLPLWV
8$QDO\WHEHORZPHWKRGGHWHFWLRQOLPLW
;0DWUL[(IIHFW
3DJHRI
&RPPHQWV
$QDO\VHV 5HVXOW 4XDO8QLWV 'DWH$QDO\]HG,QLW5/0HWKRG
6DPSOH$QDO\VLV5HSRUW
&RPSDQ\$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV
3URMHFW1DPH6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO$3
/DE,'6
&OLHQW6DPSOH,'UGTXDUWHU WKTXDUWHU
&2&
:RUN2UGHU6
&ROOHFWLRQ'DWH
'DWH5HFHLYHG$0
)LHOG6DPSOHU/0
0DWUL[)LOWHU
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH5HSRUWHG 
:*XDGDOXSH5G
$SDFKH-XQFWLRQ$=
3:6,'
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
5DGLRQXFOLGHV)LOWHU
5DGLXP  S&L)LOWHU 605$% :1
5DGLXP3UHFLVLRQ“  S&L)LOWHU 605$% :1
8UDQLXP 1' S&L)LOWHU (3$ 06
3DJHRI7KHVHUHVXOWVDSSO\RQO\WRWKHVDPSOHVWHVWHG
3URMHFW6KRRWDULQJ&DQ\RQ0LOO$3
&/,(17$QILHOG5HVRXUFHV:ULJKW(QYLURQPHQWDO6H
:RUN2UGHU6
$1$/<7,&$/4&6800$5<5(3257
5HSRUW,'6
'DWH
3DFH$QDO\WLFDO
7HUUD$YHQXH6KHULGDQ:< SK
8UDQLXP$LU)LOWHU$QDO\VLV 6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWVS&L)LOWHU
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R0%/.
8UDQLXP 1'
8UDQLXP$LU)LOWHU$QDO\VLV 6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVS&L)LOWHU
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R/&6
8UDQLXP 
8UDQLXP$LU)LOWHU$QDO\VLV 6DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWV S&L)LOWHU
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$6
 1'8UDQLXP 
8UDQLXP$LU)LOWHU$QDO\VLV 6DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWVS&L)LOWHU
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$06'
 8UDQLXP 
8UDQLXP$LU)LOWHU$QDO\VLV 6DPSOH7\SH '83 8QLWVS&L)LOWHU
$QDO\WH 5HI6DPS 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R6$'
1' 8UDQLXP 1'
5DGLXP$LU)LOWHU$QDO\VLV 6DPSOH7\SH 0%/.8QLWV S&L)LOWHU
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R3UHS'DWH%DWFK,'0%
5DGLXP 1'
5DGLXP$LU)LOWHU$QDO\VLV 6DPSOH7\SH /&6 8QLWVS&L)LOWHU
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R3UHS'DWH%DWFK,'/&6
5DGLXP
5DGLXP$LU)LOWHU$QDO\VLV 6DPSOH7\SH 06 8QLWVS&L)LOWHU
$QDO\WH 6SLNH 5HI6DPS 5(& 5HF/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R3UHS'DWH%DWFK,'06
 1'5DGLXP
5DGLXP$LU)LOWHU$QDO\VLV 6DPSOH7\SH 06'8QLWV S&L)LOWHU
$QDO\WH &RQF 53' 5(& 53'/LPLWV 4XDO5/5HVXOW
5XQ1R3UHS'DWH%DWFK,'06'
 5DGLXP
3DJHRI
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
AP-3 Air Particulate High Vol Monitoring Station
First Half 2023
Q3 2023 (September 5 and 6, 2023)
Actual Flow 74.2 cfm
Q4 2023 (November 16 and 17, 2023)
Actual Flow 45.8 cfm 60.2 Average total flow
Quarter Date
Flow Rate
(cfm)
Duration
(min)
Volume
(ml)
Q3 9/5-6/2023 74.2 1,771.2 3.72E+09
Q4 11/16-17/23 45.8 1,717.2 2.23E+09
3,488.40 5.95E+09 Total
PACE Work Order:S2311395
Parameter pCi/filter pCi/ml uCi/ml Comment
Unat <0.2 <3.4E-11 <3.40E-17
Reporting Limit 0.20 3.4E-11 3.36E-17 Meets NRC Reg Guide 4.14 requirement of 1E-16 uCi/ml
Effluent Limit ----9.00E-14 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table 2, Effluent Concentration Limits for unrestricted areas.
% of Effluent Limit 0.0%
Ra-226 1.6 2.69E-10 2.69E-16
Precision (+/-)0.2 3.36E-11 3.40E-17
MDC 0.2 3.36E-11 3.40E-17 Meets NRC Reg Guide 4.14 requirement of 1E-16 uCi/ml
Effluent Limit ----9.00E-13 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table 2, Effluent Concentration Limits for unrestricted areas.
% of Effluent Limit 0.030%

URANIUM ONE USA, INC

FINAL DRAFT
SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM MILL
TAILINGS STORAGE FACILITY
DESIGN REPORT

MAY 27, 2008
REVISED DECEMBER 2008

Submitted to

Utah Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Radiation Control
P.O. Box 144810
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4810

Submitted by

Uranium One Utah, Inc.
3801 Automation Way, Suite 100
Fort Collins, Colorado 80525

Prepared by

Tetra Tech
3801 Automation Way, Suite 100
Fort Collins, Colorado 80525

Shootaring Canyon Design Report i
TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1
1.1 Terms of Reference.............................................................................................................1
1.2 Document Organization......................................................................................................1
1.3 Project Summary.................................................................................................................1
2.0 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS AND SITE GEOLOGY.............................................................3
2.1 Previous Activities..............................................................................................................3
2.2 Existing Structures..............................................................................................................3
2.3 Climate and Vegetation ......................................................................................................3
2.4 Topography.........................................................................................................................4
2.5 Geology...............................................................................................................................4
2.5.1 Regional Geology..................................................................................................4
2.5.2 Site Specific Geology ............................................................................................4
2.5.3 Subsurface Conditions...........................................................................................5
2.5.4 Geohydrology........................................................................................................6
2.5.5 Geophysical Investigation......................................................................................6
2.5.6 Potential Geologic Hazards ...................................................................................7
2.5.7 Seismicity ..............................................................................................................8
2.6 Geotechnical Engineering Investigations and Studies........................................................8
2.6.1 Woodward-Clyde Consultants...............................................................................8
2.6.2 Hydro-Engineering LLC........................................................................................9
2.6.3 Tetra Tech and Uranium One ..............................................................................10
3.0 REGULATORY CRITERIA.........................................................................................................16
3.1 State and Federal Regulations...........................................................................................16
3.1.1 Utah DRC and NRC Regulations - Guiding Principles.......................................16
3.1.2 Design Requirements...........................................................................................18
3.1.3 EPA Regulations (40 CFR 61, National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants [NESHAPs])...............................................................21
3.1.4 10 CFR 40 Appendix A Criterion 6 through Criterion 10...................................21
3.2 State of Utah Regulations.................................................................................................22
3.2.1 Ground Water Protection (UAC Rule R317-6) ...................................................22
3.2.2 Design Basis ........................................................................................................22
4.0 TAILINGS DISPOSAL CONCEPT..............................................................................................25
4.1 General Site Layout..........................................................................................................25
4.2 Cell Configuration ............................................................................................................25
4.3 Construction and Operation..............................................................................................26
4.4 Existing Tailings and Contaminated Soils........................................................................26
4.4.1 Description of Materials ......................................................................................26
4.4.2 Contaminated Soil Cleanup.................................................................................27
4.4.3 Cleanup Limits for Soils......................................................................................27
4.4.4 Gamma Action Levels.........................................................................................29
4.4.5 Gamma Surveys for Characterization and Verification.......................................30
4.4.6 Remedial Action Support Surveys.......................................................................30
4.4.7 Soil Final Status Survey and Sampling Plan........................................................31
4.4.8 Quality Assurance and Quality Control...............................................................32
4.5 Tailings Deposition...........................................................................................................32
4.6 Radionuclide Control........................................................................................................33
5.0 CELL DESIGN..............................................................................................................................34
5.1 General Cell Design Concept............................................................................................34
5.2 Floor Grading....................................................................................................................34

Shootaring Canyon Design Report ii
5.3 Side Slopes........................................................................................................................34
5.4 South Dam........................................................................................................................34
5.5 Divider Berm....................................................................................................................34
5.6 Perimeter Access Roads....................................................................................................35
5.7 Composite Liner System...................................................................................................35
5.8 Process Ponds ...................................................................................................................35
5.9 Slope Stability...................................................................................................................36
5.9.1 General.................................................................................................................36
5.9.2 Seepage Analyses ................................................................................................37
5.9.3 Results of Slope Stability Analyses.....................................................................38
6.0 TAILINGS AND WATER MANAGEMENT ..............................................................................40
6.1 Tailings Deposition...........................................................................................................40
6.2 Tailings Production from Mill..........................................................................................40
6.3 Water Balance...................................................................................................................40
6.3.1 TSF Water Balance..............................................................................................40
6.3.1.1 TSF Model Inflows..............................................................................................41
6.3.1.2 Model Outflows...................................................................................................42
6.3.1.3 Results..................................................................................................................43
6.3.2 Process Pond Water Balance ...............................................................................43
6.3.2.1 Process Pond Model Inflows ...............................................................................43
6.3.2.2 Model Outflows...................................................................................................44
6.3.2.3 Results..................................................................................................................44
7.0 LINER SYSTEM DESIGN...........................................................................................................45
7.1 Liner System Description .................................................................................................45
7.1.1 Tailings Storage Facility......................................................................................45
7.1.2 Process Ponds ......................................................................................................46
7.2 Clay Liner.........................................................................................................................46
7.2.1 Material Properties...............................................................................................46
7.2.2 Liner Material Processing and Placement............................................................47
7.2.3 Liner Material Compaction..................................................................................48
7.3 Secondary HDPE Liner ....................................................................................................50
7.4 Leak Detection System (LDS)..........................................................................................50
7.4.1 Action Leakage Rates..........................................................................................50
7.4.2 Performance of LDS............................................................................................52
7.5 Primary HDPE Geomembrane Liner................................................................................52
7.6 Cushioning Layer for Primary HDPE Geomembrane Liner.............................................52
7.7 Leachate Collection System (LCS)...................................................................................53
7.7.1 Drainage Aggregate.............................................................................................53
7.7.2 Sand Filter............................................................................................................53
7.7.3 Collection Piping Fluid Capacity.........................................................................54
7.7.4 Limiting Head on Primary Liner .........................................................................54
7.7.5 Additional Pumping Capacity..............................................................................55
7.7.6 Piping Structural Design......................................................................................55
7.8 Liner Anchorage...............................................................................................................56
7.9 Compatibility of HDPE Materials to Leachate.................................................................56
8.0 SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE AND EROSION PROTECTION...........................................59
8.1 Design Basis .....................................................................................................................59
8.2 Drainage System Features and Layout .............................................................................59
8.3 Phasing of Surface Water Controls...................................................................................60
8.4 Maintenance Requirements...............................................................................................61
8.5 TSF and Process Pond Freeboard.....................................................................................61

Shootaring Canyon Design Report iii
8.6 Mill Site Yield into TSF ...................................................................................................62
9.0 REFERENCES ..............................................................................................................................63

LIST OF TABLES

Table 2-1. Summary of Tetra Tech and Uranium One Field Investigations
Table 2-2. Summary of Geotechnical Laboratory Testing
Table 2-3. Summary of Nuclear Gauge Field Measurements
Table 4-1. Summary of Materials to be Moved to South Cell
Table 5-1. Design Material Properties for Slope Stability Analyses
Table 5-2. Design Material Properties for Seepage Analyses
Table 5-3. Results of Slope Stability Analyses for TSF
Table 5-4. Results of Slope Stability Analyses for Process Ponds
Table 6-1. Monthly Average Precipitation
Table 6-2. Net Evaporation Rates
Table 6-3. Volume/Area/Elevation Relationship for the South Cell
Table 6-4. Volume/Area/Elevation Relationship for the Process Ponds
Table 7-1. Summary of Index Properties and Classifications of Constituent Soils Samples,
Composited Samples, and Blends for Low-Permeability Clay Liner
Table 7-2. Summary of Laboratory Testing for Clay/Sand Mixtures
Table 7-3. Sump Action Leakage Rate for All Cells
Table 7-4. Leachate Collection Pipe Sizes
Table 8-1. Drainage Channel Design Summary
Table 8-2. Freeboard Summary

Shootaring Canyon Design Report iv
LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1-1 Location of the Shootaring Canyon Uranium Mill Site
Figure 1-2 Shootaring Canyon Uranium Mill Site Location and Features
Figure 2-1 Existing Conditions Shootaring Canyon Uranium Mill Site
Figure 2-2 Shootaring Canyon Uranium Mill Plant and Related Facilities
Figure 2-3 Shootaring Canyon Uranium Mill Site Regional Geologic Map
Figure 2-4 Generalized Geologic Cross Section Across the Henry Mountain Basin
Figure 2-5 Generalized Shootaring Stratigraphic Section
Figure 2-6 Shootaring Canyon Uranium Mill Site Geologic Map
Figure 2-7 Water-Level Elevation in the Perched Water Zone and Entrada Aquifer, December 2007
Figure 2-8 Location of Wells and Geologic Cross Sections
Figure 2-9 Geologic Cross Section 1-1’
Figure 2-10 Geologic Cross Section 2-2’
Figure 2-11 Geologic Cross Section 3-3’
Figure 2-12 May 4, 2008 Geophysical Survey Location of Seismic Lines
Figure 2-13 Rock Rippability as Related to Seismic Velocities (Caterpillar)
Figure 2-14 Historical Boring, Test Pit, and Sample Locations
Figure 2-15A Tetra Tech 2008 Field Investigations Borehole and Test Pit Locations
Figure 2-15B Proposed Borrow Area Locations Shootaring Canyon Uranium Mill
Figure 2-16 Location of Potential Clay Borrow Source
Figure 2-17 Utah State Lease Area Clay Borrow Sample Locations
Figure 2-18 Potential Clay Borrow Sources within Utah State Lease Area
Figure 2-19 “Popcorn” Texture of Brushy Basin Clay Soils
Figure 2-20 Sand Seam in Brushy Basin Member
Figure 7-1 Tailings Storage Facility Liner System
Figure 7-2 Process Ponds Liner System
Figure 7-3 Example Acceptable Zone (AZ) Compaction Specification Based on the Line of
Optimums
Figure 7-4 Acceptable Zone for Compaction of Clay/Sand Mixture for Clay Liner
Figure 7-5 Gradation Curves Shootaring Tailings, Sand Filter, and Drainage Gravel
Figure 8-1 Surface Water Controls

Shootaring Canyon Design Report v
LIST OF DRAWINGS

Drawing T1 Title Sheet
Drawing P1.1 Existing Site Conditions
Drawing P1.2 Contaminated Soils Location
Drawing P1.3 Proposed Cell Grading
Drawing P1.4 South Cell Sections
Drawing P1.5 West Side Slope Plan and Section
Drawing P1.6 East Side Slope Plan and Section
Drawing P1.7 South Dam Plan and Section
Drawing P1.8 Divider Berm Plan and Section
Drawing P1.9 Liner and Surface Drainage Details
Drawing P1.10 Process Ponds Plan, Sections and Details
Drawing L1 Leak Detection System Plan View
Drawing L2 Leachate Collection System Plan View
Drawing L3 Leachate Collection and Leak Detection System Sections and Details
Drawing L4 Leachate Collection and Leak Detection System Details
Drawing L5 Process Pond Leak Detection System Details
Drawing D1 Drainage Area Map
Drawing D2 Diversion Channel Cross Sections and Details
Drawing D3 Diversion Channel Profiles
Drawing D4 Diversion Channel Profiles
Drawing D5 Diversion Channel Profiles
Drawing D6 Diversion Channel Profiles
Drawing D7 Diversion Channel Profiles

Shootaring Canyon Design Report vi
LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix A Geophysical Investigation
Appendix B Seismic Hazard Analysis for Shootaring Canyon Uranium Processing Facility
Appendix C Field Investigations
Appendix C.1 Woodward-Clyde Geotechnical Investigations
Appendix C.1.1 Logs of Borings and Test Pits, Woodward-Clyde Consultants 1977 Field
Investigation (Woodward-Clyde, 1978d)
Appendix C.1.2 Field and Laboratory Test Results, Woodward-Clyde Consultants 1977 Field
Investigation (Woodward-Clyde, 1978d)
Appendix C.1.3 Field Test Results and Boring and Test Pit Logs, Woodward-Clyde Consultants
1979 Field Investigation (Woodward-Clyde, 1979)
Appendix C.1.4 Laboratory Test Results, Woodward-Clyde Consultants 1979 Field Investigation
(Woodward-Clyde, 1979)
Appendix C.2 Hydro-Engineering Field Geotechnical Investigations
Appendix C.2.1 Logs of Borings and Test Pits, Hydro-Engineering 2002 Field Investigation
(Hydro-Engineering, 2005b)
Appendix C.2.2 Laboratory Test Results, Hydro-Engineering 2002 Field Investigation (Hydro-
Engineering, 2005b)
Appendix C.2.3 Laboratory Test Results, Hydro-Engineering 2005 Analyses (Hydro-Engineering,
2005a)
Appendix C.3 Tetra Tech Field Investigation (2008)
Appendix C.3.1 Tetra Tech Field Investigation, March 10-11, 2008, Borehole Logs
Appendix C.3.2 Tetra Tech Field Investigation, March 17-19, 2008, Test Pit Logs
Appendix C.3.3 Tetra Tech August 15-16, September 3, 2008 Test Pit Logs
Appendix C.3.4 Tetra Tech Field Investigation Laboratory Testing Results
Appendix C.3.4.1 Capstone Enterprises West, LLC Laboratory Testing Results
Appendix C.3.4.2 Tetra Tech Laboratory Testing Results
Appendix D Selected Appendices from Hydro-Engineering (2005b) regarding Contaminated Soil
Cleanup
Appendix D.1 Appendix M, Radiation Survey Quality Assurance Project Plan (Hydro-Engineering,
2005b)
Appendix D.2 Appendix E, Derivation of Soil Cleanup Criteria (Hydro-Engineering, 2005b)
Appendix D.3 Appendix F, Natural Background Concentrations of Radionuclides in Soil (Hydro-
Engineering, 2005b)
Appendix E Results of Seepage and Slope Stability Analyses
Appendix E.1 Tailings Storage Facility
Appendix E.2 Process Ponds
Appendix F Tailings Storage Facility and Process Pond Water Balances
Appendix F.1 GoldSim Model
Appendix F.2 Tony M Mine Water Balance (Appendix 2 of Report, Tetra Tech, 2006)
Appendix F.3 Water Balance Capacity Tables
Appendix F.3.1 Tailings Storage Facility
Appendix F.3.2 Process Ponds
Appendix G Liner System Design
Appendix G.1 Leachate Collection and Leak Detection Design Calculations
Appendix G.2 Laboratory Testing Results for Clay/Liner Materials
Appendix G.3 Primary Liner Cushioning
Appendix G.4 Buried Pipe Loading
Appendix G.5 Liner System Anchorage
Appendix G.6 Liner Uplift

Shootaring Canyon Design Report vii
LIST OF APPENDICES (CONTINUED)

Appendix H Surface Water Hydrology and Erosion Protection Calculations
Appendix H.1 Drainage Channel Design Calculations
Appendix H.2 Tailings Cell Freeboard Calculations
Appendix H.3 Surface Water Yield Calculations

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Terms of Reference
This design report presents the updated design of the Tailings Storage Facility (TSF) to manage tailings
discharged from the Shootaring Canyon Uranium Mill.

Uranium One Utah, Inc. (Uranium One) is submitting this design report to the State of Utah Department
of Environmental Quality, Division of Radiation Control (DRC) to support the amendment of the present
license UT-0900480 from Standby to Operational status. This report has been prepared for Uranium One
by Tetra Tech, Inc. (Tetra Tech) under the direct supervision of Melanie Davis, P.E. (Utah No. 7150266-
2202) and Mark Abshire, P.E., (Utah No. 7007426-2202).

The previous design report was submitted to DRC by Plateau Resources, Ltd and Hydro-Engineering,
LLC as part of a Tailings Management Plan (TMP) in 2007 (Hydro-Engineering, LLC, 2005a). This
submittal amends the plans previously submitted to the DRC and U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC) for the Shootaring Canyon Uranium Mill site. This Design Report incorporates changes to the
original Tailings Management Plan due to design optimization, as well as addresses comments from DRC
provided in Interrogatories Round 2, 3, and 4 (URS, 2007, 2008a, 2008b).

1.2 Document Organization
The documents being submitted to the DRC for license UT-0900480 for the Shootaring Canyon TSF are
as listed below:

• RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES
• REVISED TAILINGS MANAGEMENT PLAN
Vol. 1 Tailings Storage Facility Design Report
Vol. 2 Tailings Storage Facility Operations Plan
Vol. 3 Tailings Storage Facility Compliance Monitoring Plan
Vol. 4 Tailings Storage Facility Technical Specifications (includes Quality
Assurance/Quality Control Plan)

• REVISED ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT
• STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
• REVISED TAILINGS RECLAMATION PLAN

The revised Tailings Management Plan is comprised of four report volumes which include this Design
Report, an Operations Plan, a Compliance Monitoring Plan, and Technical Specifications. All of the
volumes for the revised Tailings Management Plan are included with this submittal.

1.3 Project Summary
The site is located in a sparsely populated area of Garfield County, southeastern Utah, approximately 48
miles south of Hanksville, Utah, 13 miles north of Bullfrog Basin Marina, and 2 miles west of Utah State
Highway 276 (see Figure 1-1). A small town, Ticaboo, is located 2.6 miles south of the site. A map of
the site and surrounding area with some of the site features is presented in Figure 1-2.

In general, the revised design for permitting consists of construction of one 30-acre cell, designated as the
South Cell. A proposed ultimate design of the tailings facility was presented in the May 2008 Design
Report (Tetra Tech, 2008a) and consisted of a double 40-acre cell system, which included a South Cell

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 2
(39.9 acres) and a North Cell (39.3 acres). The proposed ultimate design is not being submitted for
permitting at this time. However, some design components have remained to allow for the potential to
use the ultimate design in the future.

For the current design, the tailings will be deposited as a slurry into the South Cell using conventional
slurry discharge methods. The facility will be constructed, operated, and reclaimed in phases as outlined
below:

Phase I Construction of South Cell to Elevation 4430 ft for Initial Storage for Mill Startup
(Year 0)
Phase II Deposit Tailings in South Cell (Years 1-3.8 or 1-7.5, depending on ore production
rate)
Phase III Reclamation and Closure (0-4 years after end of operations)

In Phase I, the South Cell will incorporate the existing earthfill South Dam and will be constructed to
accommodate mill tailings discharge as soon as possible. During Phase II, tailings will be discharged into
the South Cell. Depending on the ore production rate, which ranges from 500 to 750 tons per day,
tailings will discharge to the South Cell for 3.8 to 7.5 years, respectively. When the storage capacity of
the South Cell has been reached, the TSF will be reclaimed for closure of the facility.

A multilayered liner system with a leachate collection system and leak detection system with a compacted
clay basal liner will be used for containment and collection of the mill tailings solution in the tailings
cells. The proposed liner system is discussed in more detail in Section 7.0 of this report.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 3
2.0 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS AND SITE GEOLOGY
2.1 Previous Activities
Previous activities at the site were outlined in Hydro-Engineering (2005b) and are summarized here for
reference. The Shootaring Canyon mill was designed and constructed between 1978 and 1981. The mill
was originally designed and licensed to process 750 to 1,000 tons/day of ore. The mill operated for 76
days in the spring and summer of 1982, processing approximately 25,000 cubic yards of ore. The ore was
processed in an acid leach circuit at an average daily rate of 500 tons per day at average ore grade of 0.15
percent U3O8. Tailings were discharged into the engineered tailings storage facility, consisting of an
earthen and clay dam constructed across a natural topographic depression. The existing tailings are
located above an existing cross valley berm on a clay liner system above the natural sandstone in the
tailings area. These tailings were discharged into the facility during April through August of 1982 (during
the 76 days of operation).

Approximately 18 acres of the site were leveled for construction of the plant, office, ore stockpile pads,
plant buildings, and auxiliary structures. The surface gradient for runoff is sloped toward the TSF area.
Filling was required over the balance of the graded area. Typically, depths of cut ranged up to about 15
feet in depth except in localized areas (such as the ore dump pocket and connection conveyor tunnel)
where excavation was as deep as 45 feet. The maximum fill depth was approximately 40 feet at the
southwest corner of the ore storage pad.

Historically, the project area has been used for seasonal livestock grazing and as wildlife habitat. Human
use of the project area for other recreational activities has been minimal, due to its isolated location and
the availability of other more pristine areas in southeastern Utah for human recreational activities.

2.2 Existing Structures
The facilities that exist at the mill site and TSF are illustrated on Figure 2-1. Major site features include
the mill and associated support buildings. Several existing ore stockpiles are adjacent to the mill and the
TSF.

Figure 2-1 shows the TSF, and includes the location of tailings from the 1982 operations, which were
only discharged upstream of the cross-valley berm. This figure also shows the east dike and north dike
which bound the 11e.(2) byproduct material.

The mill building contains the ore grinding and extraction circuits and the yellowcake drying and
packaging area. The plant facilities include the laboratory and shop buildings, generator building,
exterior reagent storage tanks, fuel storage tanks, ore stockpiles, and outside materials storage areas as
shown in Figure 2-2. Counter-current decantation (CCD) tanks and reagent tanks are on an exterior
concrete pad. During mill operations, ore was stockpiled at the prepared ore pad just north of the mill
after being weighed on the receiving scale. Ore was sampled prior to entering the mill building. As
mentioned above, the mill tailings were discharged as a slurry to the TSF west of the mill.

2.3 Climate and Vegetation
The climate in the area is classified as arid with an average annual precipitation of approximately 7
inches. The majority of the precipitation is in the form of rain. Average annual snowfall depth is
approximately 12 inches. Average annual evaporation for the area is approximately 58 inches.
Temperatures in the area range from -33 degrees F to 97 degrees F (Lyntek, 2008). Vegetation at the site
consists of predominantly sagebrush, greasewood, and shadshale saltbrush (ERG and Tetra Tech, 2008).

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 4
2.4 Topography
The TSF is located within a valley that narrows to the south of the existing South Dam. There is a steep
butte that runs along the west side of the proposed TSF with elevations over 4,700 feet. A number of
low-lying sandstone mesas are located across the site. The elevations in the TSF area range from
approximately 4,360 to 4,470 feet. The existing South Dam crest elevation is 4,432 feet.

2.5 Geology
The geology, hydrogeology, and seismic conditions for the Shootaring Canyon millsite are summarized
below from previous reports (Woodward Clyde Consultants, 1978a and Hydro-Engineering, 2005b).

2.5.1 Regional Geology
The Shootaring Canyon Uranium Mill site is located in the physiographic province of the Colorado
Plateau. This region typically consists of broad uplifts and intervening basins which are formed by wide
areas of flat lying rocks that are separated by abrupt monoclinal structures. The Henry Mountains,
located immediately north-northeast of the site, consist of intrusive dioritic laccoliths.

The site is located near the southern end of the Henry Mountains structural basin. The basin consists of
Mesozoic to Cenozoic age sedimentary rocks, and are cut by the Tertiary intrusive forming the Henry
Mountains. A regional geology map for the area is presented in Figure 2-3. The site is located in an area
characterized by buttes, mesas and canyons approximately five miles southwest of Mt. Ellsworth of the
Henry Mountains. A generalized geologic cross-section across the Henry Mountain Basin is presented in
Figure 2-4. A generalized stratigraphic section of the area surrounding the site is presented in Figure 2-5.

The basin is elliptical, with its longer axis 100 miles in length trending northerly and its shorter axis 50
miles in length trending easterly. The basin is bounded on the west by the Waterpocket Fold (monocline)
and on the east by the Monument Upwarp. Elevations within the basin range from 4,000 to 7,000 feet.
Major peaks rise 4,000 to 5,000 feet above the surrounding basin. Fault development in the area is
associated with the intrusive igneous centers of the Henry Mountains. These faults commonly have a
northeasterly or northwesterly strike and do not generally extend far from the intrusive bodies. Faults are
not known to exist within the project area.

2.5.2 Site Specific Geology
The mill is situated on a low mesa and a small, isolated catchment to the west contains the TSF. A tall
butte separates the site from Shitamaring Canyon. Drainage from the site is to the southwest into
Shitamaring Creek. The tributary in which the TSF is located has been called Shootaring Canyon. Local
relief ranges from 200 to 500 feet. Geologic structure is relatively simple in the immediate area, with the
various sedimentary formations dipping gently (2 to 3 degrees) to the west, as shown in the uranium mill
site geologic map presented in Figure 2-6.

Sedimentary rocks exposed at the surface are predominantly sandstones of Upper Jurassic age. The high
buttes and mesas west and north of the site are capped by the Salt Wash Member of the Morrison
Formation. This fluvial sandstone unit contains the uranium deposits that are mined in the area. Exposed
cliffs surrounding the buttes and mesas are comprised primarily of the thinly bedded reddish-brown
siltstones and mudstones of the Summerville Formation, underlain by the generally massive fine grained
reddish-brown Entrada Sandstone. The Entrada Sandstone is the bedrock underlying the mill and the
TSF.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 5
In the vicinity of the site the Entrada Sandstone is approximately 420 feet thick. Cementing agents are
commonly calcite and ferric iron. The depositional environment is believed to be primarily eolian. Shale
is also present locally and is evidence of episodes of marginal marine conditions.

No major faulting has been observed in the Entrada Sandstone at the site. Limited sets of joints are
widely spaced, steeply dipping and sealed with calcite and gypsum. Joint trends are northwesterly and
northeasterly, coinciding with the regional structural pattern.

Beneath the Entrada lies the Carmel Formation, which is a heterogeneous unit approximately 160 feet
thick composed of sandstone, siltstone, mudstone, limestone and gypsum. In the Shootaring Canyon area,
the Carmel Formation appears to include substantial layers of shale or mudstone. The Carmel is
underlain by the Navajo Formation which is approximately 800 feet thick in the vicinity of the site. The
base of the Navajo is approximately 1,400 feet beneath the surface of the site.

2.5.3 Subsurface Conditions
The subsurface conditions are controlled by the soil and bedrock deposits at the site as presented in Figure
2-6. The surface soils consist of Quaternary alluvial deposits, talus deposits, eolian sands, and pediment
gravels. The Quaternary soils are underlain by Jurassic Entrada Sandstone. The Entrada Sandstone is
underlain by the Carmel and Navajo formations as presented in the Generalized Geologic Cross-Section
(Figure 2-4) and Generalized Stratigraphic Section (Figure 2-5). The following is a general summary of
the various soil and geologic units.

2.5.3.1 Alluvial Deposits
The alluvium exists in the bottom of the drainages and consists of loose, subangular to angular fine sand
with varying amounts of mudstone and gravel to cobble-sized clasts of sandstone. The alluvial deposits
have a thickness of less than two feet.

2.5.3.2 Talus Deposits
Talus deposits exist on the western side of the property. The talus deposits are the result of weathering of
the east facing slope of the mesa that exists on the western edge of the property. The source of the talus
deposits are the Entrada Sandstone which make up the mesa. The talus consists of sandstone which falls
from the ledge of the mesa and litters the steep-sided mesa slopes. The talus consists of loose, fine sand
with abundant gravel to boulder-sized clasts of sandstone. The talus deposits cover the east face of the
mesa and the thickness varies from a few inches on the steep mesa slopes to as great as 20 feet along the
drainages that flow off the mesa.

2.5.3.3 Eolian Sands
Eolian sands exist in the bottom of Shootaring Canyon in isolated pockets and in a more significant
deposit in the north-east portion of the site, as shown in Figure 2-6. These windblown sands consist of
fine to very fine, poorly graded sand. These sands are reddish in color, are non-plastic, and contain some
calcium carbonate lenses in the upper portion of the deposit. The thickness of these eolian sands is
limited to a few feet in the southern portion of the site; however, the depth increases in the northern
portion of the site to be in excess of 17 feet.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 6
2.5.3.4 Pediment Gravels
Pediment gravels are located along the ridgeline where the mill is constructed and as thin colluvial
deposits along the western slope below the ridge, and also along the adjacent ridgeline east of the mill.
The pediment gravels typically consist of gravel and cobble-sized clasts in a matrix of sand and silt with
some occasional clay. The thickness of the gravel can be as great as 30 feet.

Entrada Sandstone
The Entrada Sandstone consists of an interbedded reddish brown to orange fine grained sandstone, white
fine sandstone, and dark red sandy siltstone, with calcite and ferric iron cementation. The sand grains are
subrounded to subangular and uniform in size. The sandstone is massive and generally unjointed with
occasional calcite filled fractures and joints. The bedding planes are widely spaced. The sandstone is
occasionally interbedded with shale beds up to 3 feet thick.

2.5.4 Geohydrology
The groundwater conditions at this site have been defined in the initial Woodward-Clyde investigations
and updated by Hydro-Engineering, LLC (1998, 1999, 2000 and 2005c). Additional groundwater
monitoring data are presented by Hydro-Engineering, LLC (2001, 2002, and 2005c) and Tetra Tech
(2007). The uppermost groundwater in the area of the TSF is in the Entrada Sandstone aquifer with water
levels approximately 140 feet below ground surface (bgs) below the tailings cell area. An additional
saturated zone appears to be present in the Upper Entrada in limited portions beneath the site and at
approximately 50 to 140 feet bgs.

Figure 2-7 shows the water level elevations in the Upper Entrada and the Entrada Aquifer based on 2003
and 2007 monitoring data. The groundwater flow direction in the Entrada Aquifer is generally towards
the south with a gradient of 0.01 ft/ft. The saturated zone of the Upper Entrada is not continuous across
the site and appears to be present underneath the south central portion of the site with a general flow
direction to the south.

Figure 2-8 shows the location of site monitoring wells and the location of three cross-sections previously
prepared by Hydro-Engineering, LLC (2005c). The cross-sections are presented in this report as Figures
2-9, 2-10, and 2-11. These cross-sections are based on interpretations of monitoring well data and
geologic and geophysical (neutron) logs. These cross-sections show general lithology and groundwater
levels at the site based on 2003 and 2007 monitoring data. The Carmel Formation appears to be present
beneath the site at an elevation of 3,900 to 3,950 ft mean seal level (MSL). Groundwater in the Entrada
Aquifer is present beneath the site at an elevation of approximately 4,250 ft MSL. The previous
interpretations of the Neutron logs identified several areas presumed to be lower permeability sandstone
within the Entrada Sandstone, and are presented on the cross-sections.

2.5.5 Geophysical Investigation
Tetra Tech conducted a geophysical investigation at the Shootaring Canyon Uranium Mill site to assist in
mapping the potential rippability of sandstone at the site. A geophysical survey was conducted on March
4, 2008 using seismic refraction. The geophysical investigation report is attached in Appendix A of this
document.

Seismic data from three lines located as shown on Figure 2-12 was collected for this investigation. Each
line consisted of 24 geophones each spaced ten feet apart for a total length of 240 feet each. The seismic
data was collected utilizing a Seistronix RAS 24 (24-channel) seismograph, 4.5 Hz geophones and a 12-

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 7
pound hammer as a seismic source. Shots were performed at nine locations along each seismic line to
increase data resolution.

The interpreted seismic cross sections indicate that the seismic velocities range from 1,000 feet per
second (ft/s) to approximately 7,500 ft/s from ground surface to a maximum depth of investigation of 75
feet bgs. The average sandstone velocities ranged from approximately 4,000 to 5,000 ft/s. The slower
velocities are representative of near surface unconsolidated soil with higher velocities representing
weathered rock to more competent rock at depth. These values fall within the typical velocity ranges for
weathered material and the sandstone rocks found at the site as logged in boring Tt-4, which was drilled
near seismic line # 2. Additional discussion of the boring Tt-4 is provided in Section 2.6.3.

The Caterpillar Company has compiled charts that relate seismic velocities in various geologic materials
to the ability of specific size and power of bulldozers to break up these materials by ripping. Figure 2-13
shows a Caterpillar rippability chart for a D9 Caterpillar bulldozer (Catepillar, 2008). This chart indicates
that sandstones with seismic p-wave velocities less than approximately 8,000 ft/s are considered to be
rippable, sandstones with p-wave velocities of approximately 8,000 ft/s to 9,500 ft/sec are marginally
rippable, and velocities over 9,500 ft/sec are non-rippable.

The seismic refraction survey was successful in providing data to assist in interpreting and mapping
rippability of the bedrock subsurface underneath the site where seismic data was collected. Based on the
interpretation of the seismic p-wave velocities refraction data, the Entrada Sandstone appears to be
rippable to depth of approximately 75 feet bgs. A more detailed description of the seismic refraction
survey and data interpretation is provided in Appendix A.

2.5.6 Potential Geologic Hazards
The potential for several geologic hazards exists in this area of Utah and may include landslides,
subsidence, flooding, erosion, earthquake shaking, fault rupture, tectonic deformation, and liquefaction.
Specific concerns at the site include landslides in the form of rock fall and earthquake shaking. No
evidence of the other potential geologic hazards has been documented or observed at the site.

Ground shaking is caused by seismic events which cause the ground to shake as seismic waves cause
small temporary displacements of the ground. The strength and frequency of these waves and the length
of time the shaking lasts affects the amount of damage caused. Ground shaking can also trigger soil
liquefaction, landslides, and other types of ground failure. The site is located in a Uniform Building Code
(UBC) seismic zone 1 which indicates that damage from earthquake ground shaking is not likely.
However, the seismicity of the site has been evaluated as discussed in more detail in Section 2.5.7 of this
report. The results of the seismicity analysis have been used in design of the TSF.

As indicated in Hydro-Engineering, LLC (2005b), the predominant feature along the west side of the TSF
is a narrow mesa. This mesa is composed of the native sandstone bedrock which underlies the TSF. The
nearly vertical cliff areas that cap the mesa are between 100 and 200 feet high. At the base of the
sandstone cliff areas the ground slopes at roughly a 2:1 (horizontal:vertical) slope. Scattered on the
surface of the side slopes are an assortment of sandstone blocks from past rock fall events.

When additional sandstone blocks spall from the cliffs, this material will first impact the 2:1 sandstone
slopes near the base of the cliff above the tailings cap, and these side slopes will absorb the initial kinetic
energy of the falling material. The fractured and weathered sandstone rocks would then slide or tumble
into the previously fallen sandstone talus further reducing the kinetic energy. A majority of the rock fall
material has historically been retained at elevation higher than the proposed final elevation of the TSF.
Additionally, the current TSF plan includes a bench outside the edge of the TSF at elevation 4430 that

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 8
ranges in width from 40 feet to 150 feet along the entire west side of the TSF. These benches will serve
to arrest any remaining rock fall debris that might travel beyond the historic talus area. Special
procedures for inspection, evaluation and repair of the HDPE liner in the event that falling rock reaches
the cell is provided in the Operations Plan.

2.5.7 Seismicity
A probabilistic seismic hazard analysis was performed for the Shootaring Canyon Uranium Mill site.
This analysis considered potential seismic sources within 200 miles of the site, including background
seismicity based on the recurrence of historic earthquakes which have occurred between the years of 1787
and 2007, and Quaternary faults as identified in the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Quaternary Fault and
Fold Database (USGS et al. 2006). The peak horizontal ground motion (PGA) was evaluated for a
10,000-year return period, equivalent to a 10 percent chance of exceedance within a 1,000-year design life
of the TSF in accordance with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Promulgated Standard for
Remedial Actions at Inactive Uranium Processing Sites (40 CFR 192). Results of the analysis
demonstrate that the PGA at this return period is estimated to be 0.18 g. This ground motion is almost
entirely (>99 percent) contributed to background events not associated with a known Quaternary fault.
The complete seismic hazard analysis for the site is included in Appendix B.

2.6 Geotechnical Engineering Investigations and Studies
Past geotechnical exploration work at the site is outlined below in chronological order.

2.6.1 Woodward-Clyde Consultants
“Tailings Management Plan and Geotechnical Engineering Studies” (Woodward-Clyde, 1978d)

As part of the preliminary design and feasibility stage of the Shootaring Canyon Project, Woodward-
Clyde Consultants performed a geotechnical field and laboratory investigation in 1977 as part of their
September 1978 document “Tailings Management Plan and Geotechnical Engineering Studies”. The field
investigation consisted of ten exploratory borings and 21 test pits to develop information on the
subsurface conditions at the proposed locations of two dams (i.e., upper and lower dams), the plant site,
and potential borrow sources. The engineering studies indicated that the lower dam was not needed. The
locations of the exploratory borings and test pits are shown on Figure 2-14 and summary logs are
included in Appendix C.1.1.

The ten exploratory borings, ranging in depth from 16.5 to 100.5 feet below the existing ground surface at
the time of the investigation, were drilled along the proposed center-line axes of the tailings (upper) dam
(4 borings) and a potential lower dam (3 borings), and upstream and downstream of these proposed axes
(3 borings). The 21 test pits were excavated at the location of the proposed plant site (6 test pits), along
the proposed center-line of the upper dam (5 test pits), and at locations of potential borrow sources (10
test pits). In-situ permeability tests also were performed as part of the field investigation at nine of the ten
exploratory borings. Results of these tests are included in Appendix C.1.2.

Laboratory testing of samples from the exploratory borings included natural water content and dry unit
weight, and particle-size analyses. Laboratory testing of samples from the test pits included particle-size
analyses, Atterberg Limits, standard laboratory compaction, unconfined compressive strength,
consolidated-undrained triaxial compression, and permeability using a simulated acidic effluent as the
permeant liquid. The results of laboratory testing for this investigation are included in Appendix C.1.2.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 9
“Stage 1 – Tailings Impoundment and Dam Final Design Report” (Woodard-Clyde, 1979)

Woodward-Clyde Consultants performed field and laboratory investigations as part of their May 1979
document “Stage 1 – Tailings Impoundment and Dam Final Design Report”. The field investigation
included ten exploratory borings and seven test pits to develop additional information on the subsurface
conditions at the proposed location of the tailings (i.e., South) dam and within the impoundment area. The
locations of the exploratory borings and test pits are shown on Figure 2-14 and summary logs are
included in Appendix C.1.3. Additional potential borrow sources were also identified and sampled as part
of this investigation. Samples were indicated to have been obtained from shallow (i.e., < 3 feet) test pits
or hand-sampled with a shovel. Locations of these borrow sources are indicated in the referenced
Woodward-Clyde document; however no logs of any test pits at the sampling locations were included.

The exploratory borings, ranging in depth from 27.5 to 152.5 feet below the existing ground surface at the
time of the investigation, were drilled in the saddle area adjacent to the proposed tailings dam (3 borings),
along the proposed center-line axis of the tailings dam (5 borings), and upstream and downstream of this
proposed axis (2 borings). The test pits were excavated within an area of the impoundment covered with
windblown deposits of silty sand. The test pits were excavated down to bedrock with a bulldozer to
establish estimates of quantities and properties of these soils. In-situ permeability tests also were
performed as part of the field investigation at six of the ten exploratory borings. Results of these tests are
in Appendix C.1.3.

Laboratory testing of samples from the test pits within the impoundment area and samples of potential
borrow sources included particle-size analyses, Atterberg Limits, standard laboratory compaction, pH,
electrical conductivity, and permeability using de-ionized water and a simulated acidic effluent as
permeant liquids. The results of laboratory testing for this investigation are included in Appendix C.1.4.
No laboratory testing was not performed on samples recovered from the exploratory borings.

2.6.2 Hydro-Engineering LLC
"Tailings Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan" (Hydro-Engineering, 2005b)

After construction of the South Dam, Hydro-Engineering performed field and laboratory investigations as
part of their December 2005 (revised December 2006) document "Tailings Reclamation and
Decommissioning Plan" (Hydro-Engineering, 2005b). The field investigation for this study was
performed in June 2002 and included 12 air-rotary borings, 40 hand-augured borings, and 40 test pits
(individual and in combination) to develop information on the lithology and materials properties across
the Shootaring Canyon site. The locations of the borings, test pits, and boring/test pit combinations are
shown on Figure 2-14 and summary logs are included in Appendix C.2.1. Materials sampled during the
field investigation were identified as quarry and tailings dam rock, tailings and tailings slimes, ore, clay
barrier and alternate clay source, and soil cover. Infiltration (i.e., sealed double-ring infiltrometer) and
evaporation testing also was performed as part of the field investigation. Results of these tests are
included in Appendix C.2.2.

Laboratory testing performed on selected samples recovered during the field investigation include
radiological measurements, natural moisture content, particle-size analyses, Atterberg Limits, standard
laboratory compaction, permeability, and rock durability and petrographic analyses. The results of
laboratory testing for this investigation are included in Appendix C.2.2.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 10
"Shootaring Canyon Uranium Processing Facility Tailings Management Plan" (Hydro-
Engineering, 2005a)

Hydro-Engineering performed additional analyses in their 2005 document (revised 2007) "Shootaring
Canyon Uranium Processing Facility Tailings Management Plan" (Hydro-Engineering, 2005a) to amend
the existing tailings management plan previously submitted in 1999 to the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission and the State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Radiation Control.
The analyses presented in the report incorporate improvements in the approach and technology related to
design, construction, and management of tailings facilities. No additional field investigations were
performed as part of this study, and the material properties used in the analyses are from laboratory
testing performed during previous geotechnical investigations, the results of which are included in the
appendices of Hydro-Engineering, 2005a and in Appendix C.2.3 of this report. The laboratory test results
in the appendices of Hydro-Engineering, 2005a include:

• Appendix A.1 - Shear strength data (consolidated-undrained triaxial compression) for a remolded
clay specimen from "Borrow Area GA" performed by Woodward-Clyde (date unknown).
Included in "Exhibit B" of a January 9, 1997 Inberg-Miller Engineers letter to U. S. Energy
Corporation.
• Appendix A.2 - Shear strength data (consolidated-undrained triaxial compression) for remolded
clay specimens from "Borrow Area H" and "Borrow Area I" performed by Woodward-Clyde
(June 12, 1979). Included as "Attachment A" of a December 11, 1997 Inberg-Miller Engineers
letter to U. S. Energy Corporation.
• Appendix A.3 - Shear strength data (direct shear) for sand from the Cross Valley Berm performed
by Inberg-Miller Engineers and included as "Attachment B" of a May 2, 1999 Inberg-Miller
Engineers letter to U. S. Energy Corporation.
• Appendix B - Particle-size analyses for "Entrada sand", "Shootaring tailings", "Slime tailings",
"Mixed tailings", "Quarry fines", and various "Screened rocky soil". The testing appears to have
been performed as part of investigations for Hydro-Engineering, 2005b.
• Appendix F - Standard laboratory compaction and permeability tests on "Surface Materials" from
the ore pad. The testing was performed by Inberg-Miller Engineers and included in a November
19, 1998 letter to U. S. Energy Corporation.
• Appendix G – Atterberg Limits, particle-size analyses, standard laboratory compaction and
permeability tests on materials from an "Alternate Clay Source". The testing was performed by
Inberg-Miller Engineers and included in September 20, 2005 letter to U. S. Energy Corporation.
• Appendix I - Standard laboratory compaction on "Silty Fine Sand". The testing was performed by
Inberg-Miller Engineers (December 1, 2006).

2.6.3 Tetra Tech and Uranium One

As part of the current permitting and design process, Tetra Tech has performed field and laboratory
investigations between January 21, 2008 and September 5, 2008 to develop new and/or confirm
information on the subsurface conditions across the Shootaring Canyon site and material characterization
of potential borrow sources (both on and off-site). A brief summary of these investigations is presented in
Table 2-1. The field investigations included drilled borings, test pits, and bulk sampling of surfical soil
deposits and were performed by Tetra Tech personnel or Greg Smith of Geo-Smith Engineering, LLC
(Grand Junction, Colorado). Laboratory testing was performed by Capstone Enterprises West, LLC
(Grand Junction, Colorado) or Tetra Tech (Fort Collins, Colorado and Billings, Montana). The field
investigations, samples collected, and associated laboratory testing are described below.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 11
Table 2-1. Summary of Tetra Tech and Uranium One Field Investigations
Date(s) Field Investigation Samples Collected
January 21, 2008 Collect bulk samples of on-site surficial sands. Bulk samples 1 through 4.
March 5, 2008 Collect bulk samples of potential off-site clay
borrow from Utah State Lease Area.
Bulk samples Tt-CB-1 (Jmb red) and
Tt-CB-2 (Jmb green).
March 8, 2008
Nuclear gauge measurements to determine
in-place unit weights and water contents.
Collect bulk samples of on-site sands.
Ten bulk samples.
March 10-11, 2008
Drilled borings Tt-1 through Tt-5 for
geophysical investigation and evaluate existing
soils conditions of the South Dam.
California-type and Shelby Tube
samples identified by boring number
and depth.
March 17-19, 2008
Test pits Tt-TP1through Tt-TP36.
Determine depth to Entrada Sandstone and
collect samples of on-site soils.
Bulk samples identified by test pit
number and depth.
April 8, 2008 Collect additional bulk samples of potential
off-site clay borrow from Utah State Lease Area.
Bulk samples Jmb red 2,
Jmb green 2, and Jmb green 3.
August 15-16 and
September 3, 2008
Collect bulk samples from on-site clay and sand
borrow areas for laboratory testing of clay/sand
mixtures for low-permeability liner.
Bulk clay samples C1 through C8
and bulk sand samples S1 through
S8.
Note: Jmb is used as a geologic abbreviation for the shale from the Brushy Basin Formation.

January 21, 2008

Four disturbed, bulk samples of sand, identified as Sample 1 through Sample 4, were collected on January
21, 2008 by Geo-Smith Engineering. The approximate sample locations are shown on Figure 2-15A.
Sample 1, noted to contain some calcium carbonate (CaCO3), and Sample 2 were taken from the northern
portion of the proposed location of the Process Pond(s). Samples 3 and 4 were obtained from the
northeast portion of the proposed South Cell and Divider Berm, respectively. Laboratory testing was
performed on Sample 1 and a composite of Samples 2 through 4 by Capstone Enterprises West, and
included Atterberg Limits and particle-size analyses. The results of the laboratory testing are summarized
in Table 2-2 and included in Appendix C.3.4.1.

March 5, 2008

Uranium One has a lease for potential off-site clay borrow sources within the Utah State Lease Area
located in Section 2, T36S, R9E. The clays in this area are part of the Brushy Basin Shale Member of the
Morrison Formation (noted by the geologic abbreviation Jmb). Two bulk samples of clay, identified as
Tt-CB-1 (Jmb red) and Tt-CB-2 (Jmb green), from this area were obtained on March 5, 2008 by Geo-
Smith Engineering. The locations of the Utah State Lease Area and the samples collected are shown on
Figures 2-16 and 2-17. Laboratory testing was performed on both samples by Capstone Enterprises West
included Atterberg Limits, particle-size analyses, and standard laboratory compaction. A permeability
test was performed on Sample Tt-CB-1 (Jmb red) by Tetra Tech (Billings, Montana). The results of the
laboratory testing are summarized in Table 2-2 and included in Appendices C.3.4.1 and C.3.4.2.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 12
Table 2-2. Summary of Geotechnical Laboratory Testing
Particle Sizes3
Standard Laboratory
Compaction Direct Shear*
Fines
Sample
Location or ID Sample Description/Classification1
Natural
Water
Content
(%)
Atterberg
Limits
LL/PL/PI2
(%) Gravel Sand Total Silt/Clay Activity4
Specific
Gravity
of Solids
Maximum
Dry Unit
Weight
(PCF)
Optimum
Water
Content
(%)
Friction
Angle
(deg)
Cohesion
(psf)
Hydraulic
Conductivity
(cm/s)
Sample 1 Silty Sand (w/ CaCO3) SM 1.0 Non-Plastic 85.9 14.1
Composite Poorly-Graded Sand with Silt
(Composite of Samples 2, 3, & 4) SP-SM 1.9 Non-Plastic 93.2 6.8
Tt-CB-1
(Jmb Red-1) Sandy Fat Clay CH 66/25/41 30.8 69.2 30.4/38.8 1.06 93.6 24.0 5.1 x 10-9
Tt-CB-2
(Jmb Green-1) Sandy Lean Clay CL 46/19/27 31.6 68.4 31.9/36.5 0.74
Bulk Sample Silty Sand SM Non-Plastic 85.1 14.9 110.1 12.6
Tt-TP 6 Weathered Entrada Sandstone SM 23/Non-Plastic 86.6 13.4 6.4/7.0 110.6 13.4
Tt-TP 18 Sandy Fat Clay CH 77/31/46 1.0 32.1 66.9 40.7/26.2 1.76 92.5 24.4 1.8 x 10-9
Tt-TP 27 Poorly-Graded Sand with Silt SP-SM Non-Plastic 91.1 8.9 4.2/4.7 108.7 8.6
Jmb Red-2 Fat Clay CH 96/30/66 11.0 89.0 35.2/53.8 1.23
Jmb Green-2 Fat Clay CH 111/27/84 8.0 92.0 19.7/72.3 1.16
Jmb Green-3 Fat Clay with Sand CH 57/24/33 7.4 13.6 79.0 36.2/42.8 0.77
S1 Weathered Entrada Sandstone SM 3.1 Non-Plastic 83.4 16.6 12.5/4.1
S2 Weathered Entrada Sandstone SM 3.5 Non-Plastic 79.2 20.8 14.1/6.7 2.64
S3 Weathered Entrada Sandstone SM 2.2 Non-Plastic 0.2 86.3 13.5 8.7/4.8
S4 Weathered Entrada Sandstone SM 2.7 Non-Plastic 84.6 15.4 11.4/4.0
S5 Weathered Entrada Sandstone SM 5.7 Non-Plastic 86.4 13.6 7.0/6.6 2.64
S6 Weathered Entrada Sandstone SM 2.6 Non-Plastic 0.6 76.7 22.7 14.7/8.0
S7 Weathered Entrada Sandstone SM 2.7 Non-Plastic 2.9 76.6 20.5 12.4/8.1
S8 Weathered Entrada Sandstone SM 4.5 Non-Plastic 86.4 13.6 6.5/7.1
Sand 1 Weathered Entrada Sandstone
(Composite of S1, S3, S4, and S5) SM Non-Plastic 80.4 19.6 13.4/6.2 114.7 11.2 39.8 0 1.8 x 10-4
Sand 2 Entrada Sandstone
(Composite of TP 15 and TP 25A) SM Non-Plastic 80.4 19.6 113.4 11.4 39.3 0
C1 Fat Clay CH 22.9 75/26/49 12.9 87.1 43.6/43.5 1.13
C2 Fat Clay with Sand CH 23.0 61/24/37 18.9 81.1 44.7/36.4 1.02
C3 Fat Clay with Sand CH 18.6 62/24/38 17.1 82.9 45.7/37.2 1.02 2.76
C4 Fat Clay with Sand CH 14.8 65/26/39 19.8 80.2 48.3/31.9 1.22
C5 Fat Clay with Sand CH 21.0 68/26/42 15.1 84.9 48.0/36.9 1.14
C6 Fat Clay CH 22.2 75/28/47 11.4 88.6 52.4/36.2 1.30 2.75
C7 Fat Clay with Sand CH 17.4 56/20/36 17.8 82.2 50.1/32.1 1.12
C8 Fat Clay with Sand CH 14.6 62/26/36 24.3 75.7 44.4/31.3 1.15
1 Sample description/classification based on ASTM D 2487 (Unified Soil Classification System, USCS).
2 LL = Liquid Limit, PL = Plastic Limit, PI = Plasticity Index (PI = LL - PL).
3 Gravel = 4.75 mm to 75 mm, Sand = 0.075 mm to 4.75 mm, Fines: Silt = 0.075 mm to 0.002 mm, Clay = less than 0.002 mm.
4 PI/% clay
* Performed on specimens remolded to 95 percent of the maximum dry unit weight.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 13
March 8, 2008

A site visit was made on March 8, 2008 by Tetra Tech and Geo-Smith Engineering during which
locations of five borings and thirty-six test pits were staked. Ten bulk samples of surficial alluvial/eolian
sand deposits also were collected during this site visit. Field measurements using a nuclear gauge were
taken to evaluate the in-situ wet unit weights and water contents of the on-site sands and weathered
Entrada Sandstone, and previously imported clay materials used in the existing clay liner or stockpiled
on-site. These measurements were taken at 12 of the staked test pit locations and the results are
summarized in Table 2-3. Laboratory testing was performed by Tetra Tech (Fort Collins) on one sample
of the alluvial/eolian sand and included Atterberg Limits, percent passing the No. 200 sieve, and standard
laboratory compaction. The results of the laboratory testing are summarized in Table 2-2 and included in
Appendix C.3.4.2.

Table 2-3. Summary of Nuclear Gauge Field Measurements
Unit Weight (pcf)
Material
Test
Location
Probe
Depth
(in)
Water
Content
(%) Wet Dry Comments
Tt-TP8 12 9.8 119.5 108.9
Tt-TP11 10 3.1 107.3 104.1
Tt-TP14 12 4.1 120.1 115.3 Possible sandstone at ± 8"
Tt-TP21 12 4.2 108.6 104.3
Tt-TP26 12 6.5 107.6 101.1
Tt-TP29 12 5.3 116.2 110.4
Sand
Average 5.5 113.2 107.4
Tt-TP6 bkstr 6.4 120.4 113.2
Tt-TP13 bkstr 2.5 121.1 118.2
Tt-TP15 bkstr 5.1 121.9 116.0
Tt-TP25A bkstr 2.9 117.4 114.1
Weathered
Entrada
Sandstone
Average 4.2 120.2 115.4
Tt-TP18 12 10.6 106.0 95.9 Liner Clay
Tt-TP25 12 16.8 115.9 99.2 Stockpile
Note: bkstr = backscatter

March 10-11, 2008
The borings staked during the site visit on March 5, 2008 were drilled on March 10-11, 2008 using
hollow-stem auger (HSA) or rock core boring techniques. Geo-Smith Engineering was on-site to observe
the drilling of the borings and to log and sample the soils/bedrock encountered. The locations of the
borings are shown on Figure 2-15A and summary logs are presented in Appendix C.3.1. The borings were
drilled to develop information on the depth to and competency of the Entrada Sandstone Bedrock and the
conditions of the clay core of the existing South Dam.

The depth to competent bedrock interface of the Entrada Sandstone was investigated with three HSA
borings while the competency with depth of the bedrock was investigated with one rock core boring. The
depth to competent bedrock, determined by practical rig refusal, at the locations of the three HSA borings
Tt-1, Tt-2, and Tt-3, ranged between 3 and 16 feet. The rock core boring, Tt-4, was drilled to a maximum
depth of 60 feet, and the relative competency of the bedrock was determined by percent recovery of
coring operations. Drilled intervals with no-recovery and/or washout indicate zones of weaker, less-
cemented bedrock. The data from Boring Tt-4 was also used for correlations with a geophysical
investigation, the results of which are presented in Section 2.5.5 of this report.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 14
One HSA boring, Tt-5, was drilled to allow further investigation of the conditions of the clay core of the
existing South Dam if necessary. Driven California-type and hydraulically pushed Shelby-tube samples
of the core materials were obtained. Driven California-type samples of the sand zone adjacent to the clay
core also were collected. Boring Tt-5 was terminated at a depth of 26 feet due to mechanical breakdown
of the drill rig.

March 17-19, 2008
Test pits staked during the site visit on March 5, 2008 were excavated with a tractor-mounted backhoe
between March 17, 2008 and March 19, 2008. Geo-Smith Engineering was on-site to observe the
excavation of the test pits and to log and sample the soils/bedrock encountered. The locations of the test
pits are shown on Figure 2-15A and summary logs are presented in Appendix C.3.2. The purpose of this
test pit field investigation was to develop new and/or additional information on the near-surface
soils/bedrock materials across the site, including clay soils for potential use as part of the composite
system liner proposed for the tailings storage cell. The test pits ranged in depth from 0.5 to 14 feet and
bulk samples of excavated material were collected as determined in the field.

The clay soils investigated during this field investigation were imported during previous construction at
the site in the 1980s from a borrow area located approximately 3 miles northwest of the mill site and are
from the Brushy Basin Shale Member of the Morrison Formation. These imported clays were used for
compacted clay liners constructed along the upstream toe of the South Dam ("clay blanket") and also
within an area north of the cross-valley berm, where tailings produced from operational periods of the
mill are currently stored. An area used for processing of the imported clay soils is located in the vicinity
of the east dike.

Laboratory testing was performed on samples of alluvial/eolian sands, weathered Entrada Sandstone, and
clay by Capstone Enterprises West and included Atterberg Limits, particle-size analyses, and standard
laboratory compaction. A permeability test was performed on a recompacted specimen of the clay by
Tetra Tech (Billings, Montana). The results of the laboratory testing are summarized in Table 2-2 and
included in Appendices C.3.4.1 and C.3.4.2.

April 8, 2008
A field reconnaissance of the Utah State Lease area was made by Geo-Smith Engineering (Greg Smith)
and S.M. Stoller (Craig Goodknight) on April 8, 2008 to further evaluate potential clay borrow materials.
The borrow area is located approximately 16 miles from the Shootaring Canyon Mill site and is adjacent
to the Burr Trail Scenic Backway on the Big Thompson Mesa as shown on Figure 2-16 and 2-17. The
Brushy Basin Member of the Morrison Formation crops out at the site as shown in Figure 2-18. The
Brushy Basin Member is a clay soil of late Jurassic age capped by 10 feet to 20+ feet of Cedar
Mountain/Dakota Sandstone of Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous age. The clay nature of the Brushy Basin
Member is revealed in a “popcorn” structure as shown in Figure 2-19.

Weaker Brushy Basin clays have slumped and rotated downward as seen by dipping beds in the center of
Figure 2-18. Slumping has caused overlying sandstones to be transported downward, and create the small
knolls as evident by the angular sandstone boulders shown in Figure 2-18. Overall regional thickness of
the Brushy Basin Member is approximately 300 feet; however useable thickness at this site is estimated to
be on the order of 80 feet to 100 feet due to a thick sand seam located in the upper section of the unit
shown in Figure 2-20. Based on this useable thickness and the boundary of the borrow area (shown on
Figure 2-17), the amount of clay borrow available from the Utah State Lease Area is estimated to be
approximately 250,000 cubic yards. Area with overlying topsoil, vegetation and/or sandstone will require
stripping, and the shale/clay materials will require processing and moisture conditioning.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 15

Additional bulk samples of the clay borrow materials from the lease area were collected for laboratory
testing to verify material consistency of the unit. The locations of the samples are shown on Figure 2-17.
Laboratory testing was performed by Capstone Enterprises West and included Atterberg limits and
particle-size analysis. The results of the laboratory testing are summarized in Table 2-2 and included in
Appendix C.3.4.1.

August 15-16 and September 3, 2008
Additional field investigations of potential on-site borrow sources were performed on August 15 - 16 and
September 3, 2008 by Geo-Smith Engineering. These investigations were primarily for material
characterization of clay and sand materials proposed to be blended for use in a compacted, low-
permeability soil liner for the South Cell. As shown in Figure 2-15B, the clay borrow is located within
the area north of the cross-valley berm, while the sand borrow is located on a ridge of sandstone located
in the west portion of the South Cell. The clay materials were previously imported from an off-site
borrow area located approximately 3 miles northwest of the mill site during original construction
activities in the early 1980s. The amount of useable, on-site clay material is estimated to be
approximately 40,000 to 50,000 cubic yards. Each borrow area was subdivided into zones such that each
zone represented approximately 6,500 cubic yards of proposed borrow materials, as discussed in Section
7.2. One test pit was excavated within each zone. The approximate borrow area zones are shown in
Figure 2-15B and summary logs of the test pits are included in Appendix C.3.3.

Bulk samples were collected from each test pit for laboratory testing to determine the characteristics of
the constituent clay and sand soils and various clay/sand blends. Details and discussion regarding the
laboratory testing program, evaluation of the constituent soils and soil blends, and guidelines related to
construction of the low-permeability soil liner are presented in Section 7.2. The laboratory testing was
performed by Tetra Tech (Billings, Montana) and included, natural water content, Atterberg Limits,
particle-size analyses, specific gravity, laboratory compaction, and permeability.

Laboratory testing of samples from these field investigations also was performed to confirm engineering
properties (e.g., strength parameters) of these materials used for design of other features of the tailings
facility. The results of the laboratory testing are summarized in Table 2-2 and included in Appendix
C.3.4.2.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 16
3.0 REGULATORY CRITERIA
3.1 State and Federal Regulations
Prior to the State of Utah obtaining agreement state status in 2004, the tailings at the Shootaring Canyon
Uranium Mill site were regulated primarily by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) pursuant
to 10 CFR 40, Appendix A, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under 10 CFR 61,
Subparts A and W which are administered by the State of Utah Division of Air Quality. Although this
recent change has transferred primacy of regulatory authority to the State of Utah, the existing framework
of regulations previously administered by the NRC still serves as a useful guideline. The State of Utah
will regulate the site according to rules and regulations presented in R313 - Environmental Quality,
Radiation Control. These rules include; through reference, clarification or exception; sections of 10 CFR
40 extending through Appendix A. With this in mind, the applicable state and federal regulations are
referenced and described in Sections 3.1.1 through 3.1.4. Additional, enhanced, or modified regulations
developed by the State of Utah are discussed in Section 3.2.

NRC and EPA have a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that covers joint expectations under what
was originally Subpart T of 40 CFR 61 (uranium mill tailings closure) and a generic MOU on elimination
of dual regulation. The NRC regulations also incorporate other standards by reference that were
promulgated by the EPA pursuant to the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA -
1978), and Section 112 of the Clean Air Act, as amended. Compliance with these regulations under the
authority of the State of Utah is provided through R313 and referenced sections of 10 CFR 40. In the
following discussion, applicable state and federal regulations are summarized in bold lettering and the
means by which this Design Report and the Reclamation Plan will meet these regulations are discussed
immediately below the bold caption.

3.1.1 Utah DRC and NRC Regulations - Guiding Principles
• Permanent isolation of tailings (10 CFR 40 Appendix A, Criterion 1)
The general goal or broad objective referenced in R313-24 and Criterion 1 of 10 CFR 40
Appendix A for siting and design decisions is the permanent isolation of 11e.(2) byproduct
material by minimizing disturbance and dispersion by natural forces, and to do so without
ongoing maintenance over a finite time frame (1,000 years to the extent reasonably achievable,
and, in any case, for at least 200 years as per Criterion 6). The site features to be considered in
achieving this objective include the site’s remoteness from populated areas, hydrologic and other
natural conditions as they contribute to continued immobilization and isolation of contaminants
from ground-water sources, and the potential for minimizing erosion, disturbance, and dispersion
by natural forces over the long term. The primary emphasis of this Criterion is on the long-term
isolation of 11e.(2) byproduct material, which is a function of both site conditions and
engineering design, and shall be accomplished in a manner that no active maintenance is required.

The Shootaring Canyon Uranium Mill siting was approved by the NRC in the early 1980s in
Garfield County, a remote portion of Southeastern Utah to which the region power grid had not
yet and still has not reached. Siting criteria were evaluated prior to construction of the existing
mill and TSF (Woodward-Clyde 1978a, 1978b, and 1978c). The 2006 Census indicates that
Garfield County has an area of approximately 5,174 square miles and a population of 4,534, a
decrease of approximately 1201 people since the year 2000 (population 5,735). This represents
and average population density of less than 0.9 persons per square mile or roughly 3 percent of
the average population density of 27.2 persons per square mile for the largely rural state of Utah.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 17
The small town of Ticaboo, located approximately 3 miles to the south of the mill, was originally
developed as the company mine and mill town. Its population is currently less than 55 full time
residents, though as workers for the mines and mill move to the town this population is
anticipated to increase to approximately 500 to 600 persons, mostly supporting the mill and mine
workers. The town includes a 70 room hotel which services tourism primarily associated with
Lake Powell approximately 14 miles to the south. The nearest residence is located approximately
1.5 miles to the east of the site. The tourism to the area is highly seasonal with extended periods
of reduced visitation in the late fall, winter and early spring. This area has remained relatively
unpopulated and the increase in local population that is anticipated to occur is due primarily to
workers and service providers servicing the local uranium mill and mining activities.

The TSF is sited in a local ephemeral drainage depression between sandstone mesas with a very
small drainage catchment (<0.35 sq. mile) in one of the most arid areas of the State (an annual
average precipitation of approximately 7 inches). The combination of these characteristics (a
natural depression with low potential erosive energies, a small catchment area from which surface
water erosive forces can accumulate, and an arid climate where probable maximum precipitation
events are relatively small compared to other regions in the U.S. and the State of Utah), provide
an excellent environment for the immobilization and isolation of contaminants and for
minimizing erosion, disturbance, and dispersion by natural forces over the long term.

Hydrogeologically, the site is located on Entrada Sandstone, principally a uniform fine grained
sandstone of the San Rafael group that contains some thin layers of shale and siltstone units. The
Entrada Sandstone, which hosts the uppermost unconfined aquifer in the region, overlies the
Carmel Formation, which is a regional aquitard between the overlying Entrada Sandstone and the
underlying Navajo Sandstone that consists mainly of clay, shales and interbedded fine sandstones
and is approximately 160 feet thick in the site area (Hydro-Engineering, 1998). Both the Entrada
Sandstone aquifer and the Navajo Sandstone aquifer are Class IA aquifers of high water quality.
The Navajo Sandstone aquifer is the regional aquifer used for drinking water. Though of high
quality, the Entrada is not currently used for drinking water in or near the mill area.

Lower permeability (hydraulic conductivity) units within the Entrada Sandstone have been
observed at the site that create locally perched ground water conditions above the regional water
table in the Entrada Sandstone. Ground water monitoring and aquifer testing indicates that the
horizontal permeabilities of the Entrada Sandstone range from approximately 0.08 feet per day
(ft/day) to 0.21 ft/day while the lower permeability zones above the regional water table range
from 0.02 ft/day to 0.18 ft/day. Hydraulic gradients in the Entrada Sandstone average
approximately 0.011 ft/ft and average ground water flow is estimated to range from 0.02 ft/day (8
ft/yr) to 0.009 ft/day (3 ft/year) based on an effective porosity of 0.1 (Hydro-Engineering, 1998.)
Therefore, any potential for future impacts to local ground water would be promptly detected first
by the leak detection system in the engineered liner system that is above the secondary liner and,
should both synthetic liners and the low permeability clay sub-liner not prove effective in
containing leakage, constituents in the ground water would move so slowly that ground water
impacts could be promptly detected and appropriate corrective action could be implemented such
that drinking water standards and class of use would be maintained and contamination would not
pass the points of compliance or property boundary. By virtue of its previous license approval,
NRC has determined that the combination of remoteness of the location, the physical
environment and hydrogeologic environment affords the requisite reasonable assurance of
protection of public health, safety and the environment through the immobilization and isolation
of contamination from groundwater sources, minimizing potential erosion, disturbance, and
dispersion by natural forces to support siting the mill in its current location. The application of
best available technologies in this license application only increases this assurance of protection.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 18
• No ongoing maintenance (10 CFR 40 Appendix A, Criterion 1)

The erosion protection, cover and liner reclamation designs presented in the current Reclamation
Plan (included with this submittal) will meet all applicable standards and guidance (including US
NRC, 2002 and DOE, 1989), and for long-term stabilization and isolation of the tailings and
11e.(2) byproduct material without relying on long-term maintenance in a manner consistent with
the numerous Title I and Title II uranium mill tailings facilities already reclaimed, approved and
transferred to the Federal Government for long-term stewardship.

The tailings will be dewatered to mitigate seepage and tailings settlement. Cover surfaces have
slopes designed to be stable under Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) flows and the
reclaimed tailings surface will be covered with rock mulch or rock riprap to afford erosion
protection. A low permeability clay cap and an overlying HDPE geomembrane will control
infiltration. These are described in the Reclamation Plan.

• Tailings disposal (10 CFR 40 Appendix A, Criterion 3)

The TSF is located within a natural drainage behind an existing constructed dam. The cell is
surrounded on the east and west sides by bluffs which protect the area from wind erosion and
minimize dispersion. There are currently no nearby active mine pits that would serve as alternate
disposal sites. Because the tailings will be contained within a structure using a Best Available
Technology (BAT) liner system and will be reclaimed and covered with a multi-layer cover to
include a geomembrane and erosion protection rock mulch, the proposed disposal method will
minimize the potential for exposure of the tailings or dispersal of the tailings by mechanical
forces.

• Closed with 1000-year design life, and in any case at least 200 years (10 CFR 40 Appendix
A, Criterion 6)

The reclamation design complies with applicable NRC staff technical positions, guidelines and
recommendations. See above.

3.1.2 Design Requirements
Siting (10 CFR 40 Appendix A, Criterion 4)
• Upstream Drainage Minimized

The TSF is in a natural drainage enclosed on the downstream end by an engineered, NRC and
Utah State Engineer approved dam within a very small watershed runoff area. The total
watershed area to the dam is approximately 225 acres. During operations, the runoff from the mill
area will collect in the impoundment and be evaporated. Runoff from the west bluff will be
diverted to the north of the Divider Berm (northern berm of the TSF) via a diversion channel.
Runoff from the area directly to the east, not including the mill area, will be diverted to the south
via a diversion channel. Runoff from the area north of the Divider Berm and north of the Cross
Valley Berm will be retained behind the berms and allowed to evaporate and/or will be pumped
to the east diversion channel. After reclamation, runoff to the west, north and east, including the
mill area, will be diverted offsite and the total drainage area after reclamation, including the TSF,
will be less than 225 acres.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 19
• Wind Protection

The TSF is effectively surrounded by natural cliffs and hills. The Reclamation Plan includes a
rock mulch over the tailings surface, which will mitigate wind erosion of the tailings cover
system. A net deposition of windborne soils is expected to occur over the impoundment area,
rather than loss of covering over the tailings due to wind erosion.

• Erosion Potential Limited through Flat Cover Slopes and Designed Covers

The final TSF cover will be graded to provide sufficiently flat slopes to mitigate erosional forces
but allow precipitation runoff. Rock mulch erosion protection is included as part of the cover
design for the entire tailings area. The top reclamation surface will also be configured to limit
upland contributing drainage area to overland flow.

• Conservative Factors of Safety Attained through Flat Embankment Slopes

TSF embankments and side slopes will be designed with sufficiently flat slopes to provide
conservative factors of safety.

• Not Susceptible to Earthquake Damage

The TSF design accounts for stresses induced by the postulated maximum credible earthquake for
the Shootaring TSF region based on the report titled “Seismic Hazard Analysis for Shootaring
Canyon Uranium Processing Facility” attached as Appendix B. The slope stability analyses are
included in Section 5 of this Design Report.

• Deposition Promoted

Where possible, final cover slopes will be flat enough to promote deposition of wind-borne and
water-borne sediment, and in any case, to limit erosion to acceptable levels during the 1000-year
stability period.

Ground Water Protection Standards (Utah Administrative Code Rule, UAC R317-6, 10 CFR 40
Appendix A, 40 CFR 192, etc.)
• Liner that will prevent migration of wastes out of the impoundment (UAC Rule R317-6).

The TSF cell are designed with a competent multilayered liner system (double HDPE liner with
leak detection and clay sub-liner) to provide waste containment for the cell. The liner system will
be constructed of materials that have the appropriate chemical and physical properties to prevent
failure per 10 CFR 40 Appendix A Criterion 5(a)(2)(a) (see Section 7.2). The liner system will be
placed on a competent foundation or base pursuant to 10 CFR 40 Appendix A Criterion
5(a)(2)(b). The Divider Berm and side slopes have been designed and will be constructed and
maintained to prevent failure pursuant to 10 CFR 40 Appendix A Criterion 5(a)(5). Site licensed
activities are administered under Ground Water Quality Discharge Permit UGW 170003, and the
requirements regarding groundwater protection for the TSF are contained therein.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 20
• If liner left in place following operations, wastes cannot migrate into liner during active life
of facility (10 CFR 40 Appendix A, Criterion 5A(1))

The proposed design is the best available technology approach to control the migration of wastes
into the liner system during and following operations. The operation of the leachate collection
system will continue until the tailings drainage and consolidation are more than 90 percent
complete. The post-closure cover system will limit infiltration to immeasurably small levels. The
volume of free liquids within the TSF cell after closure will be very small.

• Impoundment must not be overtopped (10 CFR 40 Appendix A, Criterion 5A(4))

Minimum freeboard to store PMP inflow and operational water as well as to allow adequate
height for wave action is included in the design of the TSF.

• Leakage detection system required for synthetic liners (Utah Administrative Code Rule
R317-6, BAT requirement).

A leakage detection system will be provided, independent of any ground-water monitoring
program.

• Tailings must be dewatered by a drainage system at the bottom of the impoundment (Utah
Administrative Code Rule R317-6, BAT requirement).

A leachate collection system will be installed in the TSF cell and operated until the drainage rate
approaches minimal levels.

• Must install two or more liners and a leak collection system between such liners (Utah
Administrative Code Rule R317-6, BAT requirement).

A double synthetic liner with leak detection system will be installed over a one-foot compacted
clay base as described in this Design Report. Additionally, a leachate collection system will be
installed in a filter/drainage bed over the double liner and clay base.

Closure (10 CFR 40 Appendix A, Criterion 6 and as Directed by NRC Staff Technical Position
[STP] for Erosion Protection covers)
• Eliminate free liquids

The volume of free liquids in the decant pool will be minimized in the TSF cell during closure by
dewatering with the leachate collection system. Operation of the leachate collection system will
be continued until the collection rates stabilize at levels of less than 1.5 gpm per 10 percent of the
typical full production operational collection rate.

• Stabilize wastes

Tailings will be allowed to stabilize (90 percent consolidation) prior to placement of the
reclamation cover. The method of tailings deposition has been designed to promote rapid tailings
consolidation.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 21
• Cover the impoundment to:

• Minimize long-term liquid migration
• Promote drainage and minimize erosion
• Accommodate settling and subsidence
• Maintain effectiveness with minimum maintenance

The final cover will be designed: (1) with a low permeability clay cap to minimize infiltration and
emanation of radon gas; (2) to minimize reliance on active post-closure maintenance due to its
conservative erosion-resistant design; (3) to promote drainage while minimizing erosion through
flat slopes and/or rock protection; (4) to control run-on and drainage of waters and (5) to
accommodate any tailings settlement. Further, the site is located in a geographical area where
annual evaporation (approximately 70 inch/yr.) exceeds the annual precipitation, (approximately
7 inch/yr.).

Radon Standards
• Post-operations (40 CFR 61, Subpart T; currently EPA – NRC MOU):

• radon emissions not to exceed 20 pCi/m2-s
• must be in compliance after ceasing to be operational until license termination

The reclamation cover design incorporates a radon barrier capable of reducing emissions to levels
below the radon standard for the required time period while reducing infiltration of surface waters
into the TSF cell.

3.1.3 EPA Regulations (40 CFR 61, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
[NESHAPs])
Any modifications to the existing TSF cell shall be in accordance with 40 CFR 61. Operations,
maintenance and monitoring of the TSF shall comply with 40 CFR 61 for radon emanation.

3.1.4 10 CFR 40 Appendix A Criterion 6 through Criterion 10
Criterion 6 - Closure Cover. The closure cover design is currently as described in the Tailings
Reclamation Plan (included with this submittal).

Criterion 7 – Pre-operational Monitoring. The mill and the major TSF structures exist at the
site. Pre-construction monitoring has been conducted, and the ongoing monitoring program
including any proposed changes are presented in the Compliance Monitoring Report (included
with this submittal).

Criterion 7A – Detection Monitoring. The ground water monitoring program is administered
under Ground Water Quality Discharge Permit UGW 170003 and is being submitted
concurrently.

Criterion 8 – Airborne Emissions. Airborne emissions related to the TSF are associated with
fugitive dust emissions. The main sources of fugitive dust at the site are from road dust from
haul/access roads, ore stockpiling, direct particulate emissions from the ore stocks and TSF, and
construction activities. Fugitive emissions from the TSF will be minimized through design and
the routine implementation of ponding and spraying. Fugitive emissions from roads and other

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 22
actively worked areas will be controlled by application of water or chemical agents as the need
arises. The Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for fugitive dust control is provided in the final
SOP document (included with this submittal).

Criterion 8A – Daily Inspection of Waste Retention Systems. The draft SOP for dam and
facilities inspection is provided in the final SOPs (included with this submittal).

Criterion 9 – Financial Surety. The financial surety for decontamination and decommissioning
is described in the Reclamation Plan (included with this submittal).

Criterion 10 – Long-Term Surveillance. The CPI adjusted long-term surveillance fee is
included in the financial surety described in the Reclamation Plan (included with this submittal).

3.2 State of Utah Regulations
The State of Utah entered into an agreement with the NRC in 2004 that resulted in the State of Utah
assuming primacy in the regulation of uranium milling and tailings facilities. With this agreement, the
applicable regulations as cited in Section 3.1 and any modifications or additions are under the
administration of the State of Utah.

3.2.1 Ground Water Protection (UAC Rule R317-6)
The administrative rule stipulates that any newly constructed facility which discharges or would probably
result in a discharge of pollutants that may move directly or indirectly into the ground water must apply
for a ground water discharge permit. The rule identifies a broad range of facilities to which it applies, and
specifically includes facilities with waste storage piles, landfills and dumps, mining, milling and
metallurgical operations. The rule also requires that any facility constructed or operated before the rule
was enacted (August 1989), must submit a notice of the nature and location of any discharges to the state
within 180 days of the adoption of the rule, and submit an application for a discharge permit upon
notification by the state. The design of the multilayered liner system, as outlined within this Design
Report, is the best available technology approach to control discharge of pollutants either directly or
indirectly into the ground water for this milling operation. The site is administered under Ground Water
Quality Discharge Permit UGW 170003. This permit has been updated based on this design and the
associated Monitoring Plan and SOPs are included with this submittal.

3.2.2 Design Basis
To meet BAT requirements as part of UAC R317-6, Plateau Resources chose to use the Engineering
Design Basis as defined by the DRC (Utah DEQ, 2007). Uranium One has chosen to follow this same
approach for the revised design. DRC provided Uranium One with a summary and clarification of the
BAT design basis requirements in their letter dated November 9, 2007 (Utah DEQ, 2007). It is Uranium
One’s understanding that Uranium One must meet or exceed the design guidelines agreed upon by the
DRC and Plateau Resources and stated in the original March 17, 1999 Ground Water Discharge Permit
(Utah DEQ, 1999) to meet the Engineering Design Basis for BAT. The design guidelines as listed in the
March 17, 1999 Permit (Utah DEQ, 1999) are listed in italics below for reference:

a. slurried tailings waste;
b. a 3-inch corrugated advanced drainage system (ADS) HDPE pipe leachate collection
system installed within a sand filter bed;
c. a 60-mil HDPE primary liner with a maximum allowable design leakage rate of 200
gallons per acre of disposal cell area, per day;
d. HDPE leak detection collection sumps for leak detection liquid collection;

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 23
e. a geonet leak detection layer;
f. a 60-mil HDPE secondary liner to be anchored with anchor trenches;
g. at least 12 inches of compacted clay with a maximum permeability of 1x 10 -7
centimeters per second;
h. native soil and/or bedrock will be graded, shaped, and prepared for the basal clay
liner. Maximum side slope will be 3H:1V.

Uranium One will meet the intent of the design guidelines above for the current design. Design features
that differ from the design guidelines are the LCS piping and the grading of the cell side slopes. The
current LCS piping design includes 4-inch to 8-inch diameter SDR 15.5 HDPE pipe. The 3-inch
corrugated pipe listed in the design guidelines was determined to have insufficient load bearing capacity.
The maximum side slopes for the cell will be 2.5H:1V except for the upstream face of the existing dam,
which will remain unchanged. The side slopes are stable for operational and pseudostatic conditions.

The November 9, 2007 letter from the DRC also summarized additional BAT engineering design basis
and operation requirements provided in the December 28, 1998 DRC and Division of Water Quality
Statement of Basis (SOB). This summary information is provided in italics below for reference:

A. Double HDPE Liners and Leak Detection System – including a double HDPE membrane liner
system with an intervening leak detection system (LDS) to detect leakage from the upper HDPE
membrane.
B. Composite Liner System – the lower HDPE membrane was to be placed in intimate contact with
an underlying clay layer to form a composite liner, which would greatly minimize leakage that
could be released to the impoundment’s foundation. Neither the December 28, 1998 SOB nor the
March 17, 1999 Permit include a direct explanation for the minimum clay layer thickness (1-foot)
or maximum permeability (1.0E-7 cm/sec). However, it appears that the maximum clay
permeability was derived from EPA RCRA guidance for landfill construction (see Design and
Construction of RCRA/CERCLA Final Covers, EPA/625/4-91/025, May, 1991, Chapters 1 and
2), and that the minimum clay thickness is based on good engineering practice for
constructability. We also acknowledge that the clay thickness specification could have been
arrived at by negotiation.
C. Leachate Collection System and Maximum Allowable Head – a leachate collection system (LCS),
including HDPE piping and sand filter layer, was to be located above the primary HDPE liner.
This design, in concert with an operational requirement of a 3-foot maximum head on the
primary HDPE membrane, would greatly reduce the leachate driving head and potential leakage
thru the upper HDPE membrane.
D. LDS Maximum Allowable Leakage Rate – the approved design included a 200 gallon/acre/day
maximum allowable leakage rate (ALR) for the leak detection system (LDS), based on 1992 EPA
guidance (EPA, 1992). The geonet material specifications for the LDS was to include a
transmissivity that was greater than this ALR, so as to ensure free flowing conditions to the LDS
collection sumps.
E. BAT Performance Monitoring Criteria – head monitoring of the LCS and flow rate monitoring of
the LDS were to be used as the primary points of compliance, and as an early warning system to
demonstrate protection of groundwater quality. BAT compliance was achieved at the
impoundment, so long as: 1) head values in the LCS remained below 3-feet above the lowest
point on the primary HDPE membrane, and 2) daily LDS flow rates were below the 200
gallon/acre/day ALR value. Although not mentioned in the December 28, 1998 SOB, this
approach to compliance monitoring is allowed in the GWQP Rules under UAC R317-6-6.9(B).

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 24
F. BAT Performance Monitoring Plan and Reporting - the original Permit also required a BAT
Performance Monitoring Plan be submitted and approved by the Executive Secretary before liner
system construction (Permit, Part II.H.2). Details regarding BAT monitoring (LCS head and
LDS daily flow rate) were stipulated in Part II.E.2. BAT reporting requirements were also
specified in Part II.G.2
G. De-Minimus Discharge – based on the above engineering design and operational parameters,
any discharge from the lower HDPE liner to the foundation was deemed a de-minimus discharge.
H. Contingencies for BAT Failure – in the December 28, 1998 DRC/DWQ SOB the Executive
Secretary also laid out possible remedial actions should BAT failure be found to exist in either
the LCS head or the LDS flow rates, including (ibid., p. 6): 1) isolation of the point of failure and
retrofit construction, 2) cell closure should retrofit construction be infeasible, and 3) contaminant
transport modeling to demonstrate that groundwater quality will be protected despite the BAT
failure.
I. Other BAT Related Considerations – a few other issues were also considered in the SOB that are
related to BAT design for the facility under the original Permit. These include:
1) Existing Groundwater Monitoring Well Network - the Executive Secretary largely accepted
the existing groundwater monitoring well network as it stood in 1998, with two exceptions
(see December 28, 1998 DRC/DWQ SOB, pp. 3-4):
a) Two New Vertical Gradient Wells – as outlined in Part II.H.3 of the original Permit,
two new wells were to be installed to determine head and groundwater quality
conditions in an area below the perched aquifer, i.e. middle Entrada aquifer. These
included new well RM16 to be installed adjacent to existing well RM11, and new well
RM17 to be installed adjacent to RM13.
b) Ore Storage Pad Well – Part II.H.3 of the original Permit also required installation
of a new well RM2R, to be installed on the downgradient side of the ore storage pad.
The December 28, 1998 SOB (p. 4) also explained that so long as the BAT performance
standards were met (i.e., maximum LCS head and/or daily LDS flow rates), that : “… neither
contaminant transport modeling nor a well spacing evaluation is necessary”.
2) Cover Design Model and Performance Criteria – an infiltration model was required for the
closed cell condition to demonstrate the absence of a “bathtub” effect (see original Permit,
Part II.H.6).
3) Reclamation Plan – was to incorporate the findings of the infiltration model used to evaluate
the long-term cover design. This plan was to be submitted for Executive Secretary approval
before commencement of milling operations (see original Permit, Part II.H.8).

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 25
4.0 TAILINGS DISPOSAL CONCEPT
4.1 General Site Layout
A proposed ultimate design of the tailings facility was presented in the May 2008 Design Report (Tetra
Tech, 2008a) and consisted of a double 40-acre cell system, which included a South Cell (39.9 acres) and
a North Cell (39.3 acres). The proposed ultimate design is not being submitted for permitting at this time.
However, some design components have remained to allow for the potential to use the ultimate design in
the future. In general, the revised design for permitting consists of construction of one 30-acre cell,
designated as the South Cell. The current plan for mill tailings disposal utilizes the TSF site previously
permitted, constructed, and owned by Plateau Resources. The general layout of the existing TSF site is
presented on Drawing P1.1.

The TSF site occupies a broad valley flanked by a high, narrow sandstone mesa along the west side and a
low bluff along the east side. The mill site is located at the top of the bluff to the east. Prior to
construction of the previously permitted TSF, the valley was drained by a dry wash sloping generally
from north to south.

A zoned earth embankment dam was constructed across the valley in the early 1980s as part of the initial
TSF. This dam, referred to as the “Shootaring Dam” in previous investigations by others and as the
“South Dam” in this report, has a height of approximately 120 feet and is listed as a jurisdictional dam
with the Utah State Engineer’s Office. Several other low, non-jurisdictional embankments were also
previously constructed upstream of the South Dam during the initial mill operations. The ‘cross valley
berm’ (approximately 30 feet high) is located approximately 1,500 feet north of the South Dam, and
another small embankment dam (approximately 15 feet high), called the ‘north dike’ in some previous
studies, was constructed another 700 feet north of the cross valley berm. An additional embankment,
termed the ‘east dike’ in previous studies, was constructed north of the cross-valley berm and parallel to
and east of the natural drainage channel (as shown on Drawing P.1.1).

As discussed later in this section, a small volume of tailings was produced during the initial mill operation
and discharged into the facility. In addition, 11e.(2) byproduct materials from the cleanup of several
nearby sites, unprocessed ore, and contaminated soils from a previous tailings fluid spill exist within the
boundaries of the TSF. All of these materials will be relocated to within the newly lined TSF during
operations.

4.2 Cell Configuration
Tailings disposal will take place within a single cell (30.6 acres) as shown on Drawing P1.1. The TSF
will be lined to an elevation of 4430 feet. The disposal cell will be constructed with a composite HDPE
liner, and will have independent leak detection and leachate collection systems.

A system of 2 Process Ponds will be constructed north of the TSF and below (west of) the mill. Details
of construction and operation are presented in the following section.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 26
4.3 Construction and Operation
The TSF will be constructed and operated in three phases listed below. Elevations listed below are in feet
above mean sea level.

Phase I Construction of South Cell and Process Ponds (Year 0)
Phase II Deposit Tailings in South Cell (Years 1-3.8 or 1-7.5, depending on ore production
rate)
Phase III Reclamation and Closure (0-4 years after end of operations)

In Phase I, the South Cell will be constructed to elevation 4430. Integration of the existing earthfill dam
(South Dam) will be incorporated during construction. The proposed grading of the South Cell for Phase
1 is shown on Drawing P1.3. Phase II deposition in the South Cell will proceed to a maximum pool
elevation of 4422.5 (established by freeboard calculations). When the storage capacity has been reached,
the TSF will be reclaimed during Phase III.

4.4 Existing Tailings and Contaminated Soils
4.4.1 Description of Materials
An estimated 99,700 cy of tailings, 11e.(2) byproduct materials and locally contaminated materials exist
within the TSF boundaries, as shown on drawing P1.2. These materials will be moved to the South Cell
after it has been lined. The materials to be moved are summarized on Table 4-1.

Table 4-1. Summary of Materials to be Moved to South Cell
Material1
Area Designation on
Drawing P1.2 Source Location
Quantity
(cy)1
Tailings E Produced April 1982 August
1982
North Cell
North of Cross-Valley
Berm
25,000
11e.(2)
Byproduct
Materials
H & I Imported from Hanksville and
Hydro-Jet sites
North Cell
North Dike, East Dike 50,000
Ore G Erosion protection for cross-
valley berm
North Cell
Cross-Valley Berm 6,700
Contaminated
Soil F
Soils contaminated by 1982
tailings spill for which
cleanup does not meet current
standards
South Cell
North of South Dam 18,000
Total 99,700
1 Material quantities reported in Hydro-Engineering (2005b)

The contaminated soils from the 1982 tailings fluid spill will be removed and temporarily relocated to the
area upstream of the cross-valley berm while the South Cell is constructed during Phase I. Included in the
contaminated soil volume is contaminated soil between the rocks at the bottom of the rock protection on
the upstream toe of the South Dam. These rocks will be salvaged and used in the construction of the
South Cell. The rock will first be segregated from the contaminated soil. If present on the rock surface,
contaminated soil will be removed by washing or other physical methods. The rock will then be surveyed
to ensure that it meets the cleanup criteria in the following sections prior to being used as construction
material. In the unlikely case a rock cannot be cleaned to meet cleanup criteria, it will be temporarily
relocated to the area upstream of the cross-valley berm along with the contaminated soils. When
construction of the South Cell is complete, all of the materials listed in Table 4-1 will be relocated there

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 27
for permanent storage. All areas where materials have been removed will be resurveyed prior to
construction to verify that cleanup criteria have been met. Verification of this clean up will be provided
to DRC for concurrence and no construction will begin until DRC concurrence is received.

It is noted that there is some disparity in the quantities listed in Table 4-1 as reported in Hydro-
Engineering (2005b). Page 1-1 reports 25,000 cy of existing tailings and 39,100 cy of 11e.(2) byproduct
material. In contrast, page 9-3 reports 83,000 cy of existing tailings and 50,000 cy of 11e.(2) byproduct
material. SRK (2007) reports on page 3-38 that 27,825 lbs of U3O8 was produced at the mill from April
through August of 1982. Using an ore production rate of 750 TPD and a grade of 0.15 percent, Tetra
Tech calculated that it would take only 27 days to produce this quantity of yellowcake. In contrast, we
calculate that it would take 4.8 months to produce 83,000 cy of tailings, running at full capacity for the
entire period. Although the 4.8 month figure is plausible, it is highly unlikely that the mill operated at full
capacity from the first ton of production in April to shutdown in August. In consideration of these
observations, the 25,000 cy figure appears more credible, and is the figure we have reported herein.
Regardless, there is sufficient interim storage capacity in the clay lined existing tailings cell for
contaminated soils and all 11e.(2) byproduct material will be transferred to the new south cell once
constructed.

4.4.2 Contaminated Soil Cleanup
Hydro-Engineering (2005b) conducted a radiological characterization survey to identify areas of the site
where soil contamination exists. The exact boundaries of the areas cannot be defined at this time since
most of the areas were influence by gamma shine from nearby building components, ore piles, or tailings.
The affected areas will be remediated using more sensitive survey equipment to assure compliance with
the cleanup criteria.

In general, a MARSSIM (Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual) approach will
be used for verification surveys (final status surveys) using the Data Quality Objectives (DQOs)
established in the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) (Hydro-Engineering 2005b, Appendix M). The
QAPP from Hydro-Engineering (2005b) is provided as Appendix D.1 for ease of reference. In order to
assure that the extent of the area has been defined, a 10-meter buffer area (considered Class II and Class
III in MARSSIM terminology) contiguous to each contaminated area will be evaluated for potential
contamination.

Class I survey units will be defined as the footprint of the affected areas established from process
knowledge coupled with characterization surveys. The grid size and sample number for the MARSSIM
area will be dependent on mill related contaminant variability estimates obtained from characterization
surveys and remedial action support surveys. Compliance with cleanup criteria will be evaluated by
comparing the mean radionuclide soil concentration within the Class I survey unit to the appropriate
cleanup criteria. These data will be supplemented by field surveys employing gamma and/or gross alpha
measurements in soils to demonstrate that the mill- related radionuclide spatial distribution within the
Class I survey unit area is homogenous. Any hot spots (areas above cleanup criteria for a 100 square
meter area) requiring further remediation will have been identified prior to performing the final status
survey. The site cleanup criteria and procedures are presented in following subsections.

4.4.3 Cleanup Limits for Soils
The contaminants on the site have been determined to be uranium ore, process solution residuals, Th-230,
and to a lesser extent, uranium tailings. No evaporation ponds currently exist at this site except for the
very small lined pit on the tailings where the cross valley berm sump water is pumped. This lined pit is
normally dry. The cleanup criteria for tailings are given in 10 CFR 20, Appendix A and Utah Regulation

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 28
R313-24. The criteria require the cleanup of Ra-226 to 5 pCi/g above background, averaged over the
surface 15-cm depth layer and an area of 100 square meters. The limit for subsurface layers is 15 pCi/g.

For radionuclide mixes that are different than uranium tailings, the cleanup criteria are to be based on the
Benchmark Approach, where the site specific TEDE (Benchmark Dose) to the critical receptor is
calculated using Ra-226 at 5 pCi/g in surface soils. The site-specific contaminant levels are then adjusted
so that the TEDE does not exceed the Benchmark Dose.

The radionuclide mix of process solution residuals and uranium ore are identical, based on process
knowledge. Therefore the Benchmark Approach was used to develop the cleanup criteria using a
radionuclide mix of U-238 and U-235 with the progeny in secular equilibrium and assuming the natural
abundance ratios for the uranium isotopes. The analysis, presented in Hydro-Engineering (2005b),
Appendix F, limits the natural uranium contamination in soil to 9.1 pCi/g (13.4 mg/kg). This corresponds
to a Ra-226 concentration of 4.4 pCi/g above background. For subsurface layers, it is assumed that the
Ra-226 concentration limit would be 3 times the surface layer (similar to that of tailings), or 13 pCi/g
above background levels. ALARA considerations require that an effort be made to reduce these
concentrations to as low as reasonably achievable levels. The analysis is presented in Appendix E of
Hydro-Engineering (2005b) and is provided as Appendix D.2 of this report for ease of reference.

The area shown as “F” on Drawing P1.2 consists of approximately 6.5 acres and is potentially
contaminated by Th-230 from a tailings water spill. Because the contaminants were originally deposited
within the pool of fugitive solution, the distribution of Th-230 at the time of the spill was likely fairly
uniform within the pool area. Some cleanup of the 6.5 acres affected by the fluid had been done shortly
after the spill, and there is currently less than one acre exhibiting elevated surface gamma-ray exposure
rates, attributable to Ra-226 contamination. The measured Ra-226 and Th-230 concentrations in soil
samples taken from this small area were less than 35 and 200 pCi/g, respectively. The field gross alpha
method will be applied to areas previously determined to be free of gamma-emitting radionuclides.
Therefore alpha emissions above natural background levels should be attributable primarily to the decay
of Th-230. A set of soil samples has been collected from the affected area and analyzed by a vendor
laboratory. A correlation between the gross alpha count rate and the Th-230 concentrations will be
developed. This will result in site specific performance parameters (efficiency and MDA) for the gross
alpha method.

Plans are to construct the South Cell on Area F after the area has been determined to meet the cleanup
criteria. Since cleanup criteria for Th-230 contaminated soils do not exist, the Benchmark approach and
an alternative calculation comparing Rn-222 releases were considered for establishing the cleanup
criteria. The Benchmark method limits the residual radionuclide concentrations such that the dose is no
larger than the dose from occupancy of the site if the surface soils were contaminated with Ra-226 at 5
pCi/g. The dose from radon emissions is specifically excluded. Exposure scenarios for developing Th-
230 cleanup criteria for this area were considered. For the very unlikely scenarios where short-term
occupancy of the site is possible, the direct and airborne particulate exposure to occupants from surface
soils contaminated with 5 pCi/g Ra-226 would be much higher when compared to the exposures from Th-
230 contamination lying beneath a cell liner or earthen cover. Another exposure route considered was the
use of water from an aquifer beneath the site as drinking water for nearby residents. However, it is
widely known that Th-230 is immobile in near-neutral pH water. These exposure pathways lead to an
unreasonably high Th-230 cleanup criterion. Thus the Benchmark dose assessment method was not
applied at this site. The only significant exposure pathway from residual Th-230 results from Rn-222
releases from the in-growth of Ra-226. Since 10 CFR Part 40, Appendix A already has a standard for
subsurface Ra-226, Uranium One proposes to limit the existing Th-230 concentrations in any 15-cm layer
and 100-m2 area to that which would result in a maximum of 15 pCi/g of Ra-226 above background at

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 29
any time during the next 1,000 years. This proposed approach is an alternate calculation for meeting the
existing Ra-226 standard.

The current Th-230 concentrations are much higher than the Ra-226 concentrations and therefore the
Bateman equations show that the maximum Ra-226 concentration will occur at the end of the 1,000-year
period. Therefore, Uranium One will limit the Ra-226 to 15 pCi/g, calculating the Ra-226 concentration
by the equation

Ra-226 (pCi/g) = 0.65 Ra-226E (pCi/g) + 0.35 Th-230E (pCi/g)

where the subscript “E” indicates currently existing concentrations. A statistical analysis of the
preoperational natural background data is presented in Appendix F of Hydro-Engineering (2005b). The
Appendix F from Hydro-Engineering (2005b) is provided as Appendix D.3 of this report for ease of
reference. Recommended mean background level for U-nat is of 0.51 pCi/g, for Th-230 is 0.54 pCi/g, and
for Ra-226 is 0.34 pCi/g. For purposes of demonstrating compliance with soil cleanup criteria, Uranium
One will assume mean background soil concentrations of U-nat, Th-230, and Ra-226 are zero.

4.4.4 Gamma Action Levels
Gamma surveys will be used to guide the soil remediation efforts. The surveys will identify soil
contamination that exceeds the cleanup criteria and will be used to guide the cleanup efforts. After
cleanup, the surveys will be used, in conjunction with surface soil sample analyses, to verify cleanup to
the site cleanup criteria. A gamma action level, defined as a gamma count rate level corresponding to the
soil cleanup criterion, is used in the interpretation of the data. Normally the action level is conservatively
developed to allow only a five percent error rate of exceeding the cleanup criteria at the 95 percent
confidence level.

Action levels will be determined after most of the contaminated material has been removed. Separate
action levels will be required for areas where process materials or uranium ore is the principal
contaminant, and for areas affected by uranium tailings. These action levels are expected to be similar
but will be checked for accuracy during the excavation of material. Action levels will be established by
developing a correlation between Ra-226 concentrations and gamma-ray count rate using the appropriate
statistical approach to estimate the 95 percent confidence level. The action levels will correspond to a
gamma-ray count rate that conservatively predicts that the Ra-226 in soil may be above the cleanup
criterion.

Twenty or more locations within the contaminated area will be chosen where the Ra-226 concentrations
do not exceed 25 pCi/g. Measurements will be made in locations where the gamma-ray levels are
uniform. A 2-inch by 2-inch NaI detector will be placed at the normal monitoring height above the point
and a count-rate determination made. A 5-point composite soil sample will be taken within a 3-ft
diameter area to represent the average concentration within the circular area. The detector height of 45
cm will be used since at this height, a majority of the above-background counts should arise from gamma-
rays originating from the 3-ft diameter area. This method of determining the action level has been shown
to be equivalent to averaging the gamma count rate over a larger area (100 m2) and performing a five
point sampling of the grid blocks, (Pathfinder Mines Corporation, Site Cleanup and Verification Plan for
the Shirley Basin Mill Site). Correlations developed using smaller areas are necessary when there are no
large uniformly contaminated areas. The gamma-ray count rates per pCi/g in the soil are, however,
theoretically slightly smaller, resulting in a more conservative gamma-ray action level. The gamma
action level(s) will be developed as soon as practical after the decision is made to proceed to reclaim and
will be provided to the State of Utah at that time. The data and correlation(s) will also be included in the
Completion Report. A correlation between gamma count rate and Ra-226 activity will also be developed

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 30
using the final verification sampling results for the grid blocks. This correlation should confirm that the
gamma action level was appropriate and resulted in compliance with the cleanup criteria. The final
sampling and this correlation will be done while excavation equipment is still available on site.
Correlation and sampling data will be supplied to the regulator as soon as practicable. The final
correlation will also be presented in the Completion Report.

4.4.5 Gamma Surveys for Characterization and Verification
Two methods are proposed for conducting site gamma surveys: the first is the use of the GPS-based
radiological survey system and the second is the use of the equivalent conventional method using a
Ludlum 2221 rate-meter/scaler and Model 44-10 detector. Since the methods differ only by data
recording and management, there are no apparent differences in the accuracy of the results. The surveys
are described below. Uranium One will decide which method to employ.

Gamma Surveys and Mapping Using Global Positioning System
The GPS-based radiological survey will be done using equivalent equipment to that used in the
correlation studies. The gamma-mapping system consists of digital gamma-ray monitoring equipment
coupled to a Ludlum Model 44-10, a 2-inch by 2-inch NaI(Tl) detector. The digitized radiological count
rate data are recorded once every two seconds by transmission to a Trimble ProXR GPS receiver (or
equivalent), which automatically tags the data with the coordinates at the time the data count rate is
received. The ProXR, manufactured by Trimble Navigation, is state-of the-art land surveying equipment,
employing the use of satellite global positioning system (GPS) technology. The accuracy of the
coordinates is better than one meter while collecting data. The data are collected in a data logger and later
downloaded into a computer. The data are then loaded into the ArcView GIS or other software for
mapping and developing isocontours.

A gamma survey will be done over the extent of the affected areas and buffer areas. Gamma count rate
isocontour lines at the action level will be used to define where remediation is required. After the
remediation, the area will be resurveyed and the new data added to the database. This iterative procedure
will be applied until all areas are determined to meet the action levels.

In the verification phase, the average count rate over each 100 square meter grid block is calculated by
downloading the data into a database management computer application. The data records within each
grid block are counted, averaged, and assessed as to whether the grid block meets verification criteria.

Function checks for the equipment will be performed at the beginning of each work shift using standard
operating procedures. In addition, standard operating procedures will be used for operating the GPS-
based radiological survey equipment as well as processing the data.

Radiological Surveys and Mapping Using Conventional Methods
Gamma surveys may be conducted using the same type of radiological survey equipment described
above, other than the data will be recorded manually and presented on maps with isocontours using
computer assisted means. Grid blocks of 33-ft by 33-ft (approximately 100 square meters) will be
established over the affected area. In order to determine the average gamma count rate within a grid
block, the Ludlum Model 2221/Model 44-10 combination will be used to integrate the count rate while a
technician walks the area for one minute. Correlation studies at other mill sites have demonstrated that
this results in a good correlation with the Ra-226 in the soil.

4.4.6 Remedial Action Support Surveys
Remediation of contaminated soils will be done by excavation. The purpose of remedial action support
surveys (excavation control monitoring) is to guide the removal of contaminated material to the point

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 31
where it is highly probable that an area meets the cleanup criteria. Monitoring equipment and action
levels developed in the calibration studies will be used for excavation control monitoring. A technician
will monitor the soil after the removal of layers of soil until the instrumentation shows that the levels are
below the action level. The detector is held close to the ground so that small “hot spots” will be identified
and removed. This will lead to the area having a uniformly contaminated surface soil layer. This reduces
sampling error and will provide additional assurance that the average measured concentration in any 100
square meter area meets the cleanup criterion. No documentation of the results is done since the
verification data will serve to demonstrate compliance with the cleanup standards. For large areas, a GPS
based survey may be performed periodically to predict the progress of the excavation.

For areas exhibiting contamination below the top six inches, excavation control monitoring will be done
using the same detector as used in the calibration study, considering the appropriate action level and
adjusting for geometry factors. The cleanup limit for deep excavations in tailings affected areas where
backfill is applied is 15 pCi/g above background for Ra-226. For ore or process material contaminated
areas, the subsurface criterion for Ra-226 is 13.2 pCi/g (or 27.3 pCi/g U-nat) developed in the Benchmark
Dose Assessment.

Excavation control for the Th-230 contaminated areas will be done using a gross alpha procedure. The
soil sample will be dried and pulverized and placed in a ZnS-coated container. The container will be
counted in a Lucas Cell Counter. The counter will be calibrated using soil samples collected from the site
and analyzed for Th-230 by a vendor laboratory using isotopic thorium procedure, EPA-970. The
measured gross-alpha MDA for this procedure is 14 pCi/g. All soils with elevated uranium or radium
concentrations will be removed by excavating soils with elevated gamma-ray emissions. Samples will be
taken throughout the area on a 100-m grid spacing with the sample locations determined by GPS.
Samples will be analyzed using the gross alpha technique. A 50-m grid will be established around all
locations where the Th-230 concentrations exceed the DCGL. Samples will be taken at 50-m grid
locations until the aerial extent of the contamination has been established. Additional soil will be
removed from areas exceeding the cleanup criteria for Th-230. The process will be repeated until there is
a high degree of assurance, based on professional judgment, that the surface soils will meet the cleanup
criteria. Standard Operating Procedure HP-24, Soil Screening Method for Th-230 in Soil, provides
details for the gross alpha method. Samples will be taken throughout the area based on the concentration
of Th-230 and physical spacing of the previous Th-230 sampling.

4.4.7 Soil Final Status Survey and Sampling Plan
A final gamma survey of the affected area and buffer zone will be performed using the GPS-based
equipment or conventional equipment as described above. For the GPS-based survey, a minimum of 10
data records in each 100 square meter grid block will be used to obtain the average gamma count rate for
the affected areas of the site. For conventional surveys, a 1-minute integrated count while walking the
area will be used as the average count rate.

For all grid blocks where the average count rate (bare Ludlum 44-10 detector) exceeds the action level,
the grid blocks will either be cleaned to below the action level or the grid blocks will be sampled to assure
compliance with the cleanup criteria. The five-point soil sampling procedure is given in SOP HP-22.
The sample will be analyzed to assure that the Ra-226 concentration complies with the cleanup criteria.

All verification samples will be analyzed by a vendor laboratory according to the QAPP. Standard
Operating Procedures HP-21, HP-22 and HP-23 include details of the soil final status survey and
sampling plans for surface and subsurface contaminated areas.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 32
For the Th-230 contaminated area (Area F), all areas exhibiting elevated gamma levels will be cleaned to
near background levels. Soil samples will be taken from Area F at MARSSIM based grid locations and
analyzed off-site until evidence shows that the area meets the cleanup criteria. Documentation of the
sampling locations and the results will be included in the completion report. The sampling method and
quality assurance requirements specified in standard operating procedures, HP-21, HP-22, HP-23, and
HP-24 and the QAPP will be applied to this area. Uranium One will submit field control and verification
data for Area F to the Utah Division of Radiation Control (UDRC) before Area F is covered.

Area F will constitute one Class I survey unit. The footprint of existing tailings in the disposal cell will
constitute another survey unit. The size of MARSSIM survey units in other areas of the site will be
determined based on conditions of the site at the time of decommissioning. After the Th-230
contaminated areas has been verified as meeting the cleanup criteria, a completion report will be prepared
and submitted to the State of Utah for approval. Final reclamation of all areas outside the limits of the
South Cell is addressed in the revised Reclamation Plan.

4.4.8 Quality Assurance and Quality Control
The quality assurance project plan (QAPP) establishes the quality assurance and control measures for
field measurement, sample collection, and laboratory analysis for all decommissioning activities and is
included as Appendix D.1. The QAPP also establishes performance criteria for field and laboratory data
precision, accuracy, completeness, and representativeness.

Uranium One management will check all aspects of data collection and input to verify that procedures are
being followed. The collection and handling of samples from the radiological cleanup areas will be
reviewed and approved by management. Laboratory results for these samples will be evaluated and
validated to requirements in the QAPP. Other aspects of the reclamation including adherence to the SOPs
and adherence to the reclamation plan will be evaluated by Uranium One management on a daily basis.
The construction process will be monitored to confirm that appropriate physical and radiological safety
procedures are followed. Excavation processes will be monitored to ensure that contaminated materials
are not handled carelessly and that any spillage is collected and contained. The conveyance of
contaminated materials to the tailings area will be monitored to prevent dispersal of these materials in the
environment. Construction and sampling activities will be documented and reviewed throughout the
reclamation process.

4.5 Tailings Deposition
Tailings will be delivered as a slurry from the mill to the TSF, by gravity through a series of pipes, where
it will be deposited by conventional slurry discharge methods. The main tailings line will have
continuous double containment from the mill to the lined TSF area. Tailings will be transferred from the
main tailings delivery line to a secondary tailings distribution system, which will deliver the tailings, also
by gravity, to the TSF. A tailings distribution station will be incorporated between the main tailings
delivery line and the tailings distribution system. The distribution station will provide the ability to
bypass the tailings distribution system by diverting the tailings flow from the main tailings delivery line
directly into the TSF, which will ensure that mill operation can continue uninterrupted in the event that
the tailings distribution system needs to be taken offline for service.

Tailings will be delivered to the storage cell via a perimeter distribution system which will have valved
delivery pipes off of the perimeter pipe at regular spacing. This system was designed to facilitate efficient
and controlled distribution of tailings, allowing the operator to control tailings deposition rates and the
location of the tailings pool. Details of the tailings distribution are provided in the TSF Operations Plan.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 33
Depending on the ore production rate, which ranges from 500 to 750 tons per day, tailings will discharge
to the South Cell for 3.8 to 7.5 years, respectively. When the storage capacity of the South Cell has been
reached, the TSF will be reclaimed for closure of the facility.

4.6 Radionuclide Control
Environmental protection from the radionuclides in the tailings and contaminated soils will consist of an
underlying liner system, TSF capacity considerations, and management of dust control and air quality.
Groundwater resources will be protected with a multi-layer composite liner system consisting of a
compacted clay liner (CCL), a secondary HDPE geomembrane with a geonet leak detection system,
primary HDPE geomembrane, and a leachate collection system over the primary liner. This liner system
will be supplemented by leak detection sumps and downgradient groundwater monitoring wells. Surface
water drainage through the site and the TSF capacity will be designed so that all potentially contaminated
waters are stored within the TSF. Ambient air quality will be protected from the release of radon-222
from exposed tailings surfaces by a combination of water cover, interim soil cover, and surface spraying.
Annual radon monitoring will be performed to comply with NESHAPS requirements as described in the
Compliance Monitoring Plan that will be submitted at a future date.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 34
5.0 CELL DESIGN
5.1 General Cell Design Concept
Tailings disposal will take place within a single cell, designated as the South Cell as shown on Drawing
P1.1. A new berm will be constructed across the existing valley north of the existing South Dam to
contain tailings on the north side of the TSF. The TSF will be lined to an elevation of 4430 feet, with a
total containment area (plan) of 30.6 acres at that elevation. The cell will be constructed using existing
natural on-site materials for the primary earthwork, with materials for clay liners and erosion protection
imported from nearby sources. The TSF will have a composite HDPE liner, and will have independent
leachate collection (LCS) and leak detection systems (LDS).

The design of the cell floor, side slopes, embankment and access roads are discussed in the subsections
below, followed by the results of slope stability analyses and a discussion of earthwork and TSF storage
volumes. Elevations presented in this section are in feet above mean sea level. Specific design details for
the liner systems are presented in Section 7.

5.2 Floor Grading
The floor grading for the South Cell is presented on drawing P1.3. The floor of the cell will slope gently
to the south, roughly following the existing topography. Floor grades generally range from 4.0 percent to
6.3 percent. A sump will be constructed near the center of the South Dam to collect drainage from the
LCS and LDS. Rough grading for the cell includes removal of contaminated soils just north of the South
Dam and removal of the existing tailings, ore, and imported 11e.(2) byproduct material as discussed in
Section 4.0 and presented on drawing P1.2.

5.3 Side Slopes
The side slopes will be 2.5:1(horizontal:vertical). The slopes will be constructed of onsite fill materials
produced during cell excavation. A minimum 1-foot thick compacted clay liner (CCL) having a
maximum permeability of 1x10-7 cm/s beneath the composite liner system will be constructed to provide
additional protection of groundwater resources. Areas where the outside perimeter of the TSF meets
existing grades will be trimmed to a slope of 1:1 where the slope is in bedrock (likely for the majority of
the east and west sides), and to 2:1 where the slope is in undisturbed natural soils.

5.4 South Dam
Details for the South Dam are presented on Drawing P1.7. The crest of the existing South Dam is
presently at elevation 4432. The upstream face of the existing South Dam has a slope of 2:1, and will
remain at this slope. The existing riprap will be removed and stockpiled for reuse. The riprap at the
upstream face will be removed, the surface will be prepared, and a 1-foot thick compacted clay liner
(CCL) having a maximum permeability of 1x10-7 cm/s will be constructed to elevation 4430 on the side
slopes.

5.5 Divider Berm
A new Divider Berm will be constructed across the valley in a roughly east-west direction to contain the
tailings along the north side of the TSF. The Divider Berm will be constructed of natural on-site
materials to elevation 4430, with the upstream and downstream faces at 2.5:1 (H:V) slopes. The south
face of the Divider Berm will be lined to elevation 4430.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 35
5.6 Perimeter Access Roads
Access around the perimeter of the cells will be provided by constructing narrow roads around the cell
perimeters. Sections and details of the access roads are presented on drawing P1.10. Temporary access
around the 4430 elevation of the South Cell will be provided by preserving the outermost 26 feet of the
bench at this elevation for tailings distribution piping and service/maintenance vehicle access.

As shown in the details on drawing P1.10, the composite liner at the 4430 level will terminate in an
anchor trench located along the inside edge of the safety berm. An additional 30-mil HDPE liner will be
placed to protect the safety berm from potential tailings spills on the pipe bench. This additional liner
will be anchored along the outside edge of the safety berm, will cover the safety berm and the pipe bench,
and will be welded to the primary liner below the TSF rim.

Surface drainage from the slopes above the cells will be collected in ditches, as shown in drawings P1.5 to
P1.10. The west side collection ditch will convey surface water to temporary detention north of the
Divider Berm, and to the east side ditch will pass surface water to the south of the South Dam. Surface
water control is discussed in detail in Section 8.

5.7 Composite Liner System
Details for the composite liner system are presented on Drawings L1 through L5. The drainage gravel
layer of the LCS will cover the cell floor only, and will not continue up the side slopes. Anchor trenches
will be constructed along the top of each cell. Liner design criteria are presented in Section 7.

5.8 Process Ponds
Mill process fluids are estimated to be discharged to the Process Ponds at an average rate 20 gallons per
minute for 24 hours a day for 350 days a year. The planned location of the Process Ponds is shown on
drawing P1.1. The location of the ponds was chosen based on the ultimate design of the TSF, the
proximity to the mill, and the existing topography. The ponds are designed to have a freeboard of 3 feet
and have a maximum depth of 14 feet for the North Process Pond and 20 feet for the South Process Pond
including the freeboard. The water balance for the Process Ponds is discussed in detail in Section 6.0.
The top perimeter dimensions for the North Process Pond are approximately 450 feet long by 330 feet
wide, with a corresponding top pond surface area of approximately 3.1 acres. The top perimeter
dimensions of the South Process Pond are approximately 330 feet on the north side, 520 feet on the west
side, 250 feet on the south side, and 525 feet on the east side, with a corresponding top pond surface of
approximately 3.0 acres. The inside slopes of the ponds are at a 3:1 slope, the outside fill areas of the
ponds have a 2.5H:1V slope, and the outside cut areas of the ponds have a 2H:1V slope. The results of
the Process Pond slope stability analyses are presented in Section 5.9.

The ponds will be constructed with the same liner detail as for the TSF, except that there is not a leachate
collection system. The bottoms of the ponds will slope at 1 percent towards the LDS sump in each pond.
An 18-inch layer of gravel will be placed in the bottom of the ponds to allow for cleanout of the ponds, if
necessary. The gravel layer will be underlain with a 10-ounce per square yard geotextile cushioning
layer. Liner system design for the Process Ponds is discussed in more detail in Section 7.0.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 36
5.9 Slope Stability
5.9.1 General
Analyses of the cell embankments and side slopes were conducted to ensure sufficient stability for all
configurations and conditions expected to exist during the operational life of the TSF and the Process
Ponds. Seepage and stability analyses were conducted using GeoStudio 2007 design software (Version
7.12, Build 4143, GEO-SLOPE International, Ltd.).

In addition to static analyses, pseudostatic analyses were conducted for each configuration to assess slope
stability during seismic activity. As described in Section 2.5, the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for
the Shootaring Canyon site indicates a peak ground acceleration (PGA) of 0.18g for a 10,000 year return
period, equivalent to a 10 percent chance of exceedance in the 1,000 year design life of the TSF. A
horizontal coefficient of 2/3 of the PGA, or 0.12g, was for pseudostatic analyses.

The South Dam, side slopes, and Divider Berm of the TSF were also evaluated under two different live
load conditions. A live load corresponding to a 34 kip axle load applied 5 feet from the edge of the
embankment or slope was evaluated under static loading conditions and simulates truck traffic around the
perimeter of the TSF. The Process Pond embankment was also evaluated for this live loading condition.
The other loading condition evaluated was a live load corresponding to a vibratory compactor applied
separately at each edge of the slope and evaluated under static loading conditions. The vibratory
compactor, a Caterpillar CS76XT or similar, provides a pressure of 2,065 psf at the drum.

The soil strength parameters used in the analyses were taken from previous investigations or were adapted
from these investigations. The sands used to construct the TSF Divider Berm will consist of compacted
on-site sands. Design soil strength parameters for the stability analyses are presented in Table 5-1.

Table 5-1. Design Material Properties for Slope Stability Analyses
Soil Type Use
Total Unit
Weight
Pcf
Cohesion
psf
Friction
Angle
deg
Clay Layer1 Side slopes over sand fill, divider
berm over sand fill 122 0 27
Clay core1 South Dam (as-built) core 122 0 27
Sand filter1 South Dam (as-built) filter 125 0 30
Clayey sand & gravel1 South Dam (as-built) shell 131 0 40
Toe drain material1 South Dam (as-built) toe drain 130 0 35
Entrada Sandstone1 Foundation and prepared
foundation 140 1,000 45
Natural Sands Prepared foundation of Process
Ponds 1162 0 323
Compacted Sand Fill
(On-site sands and excavated
Entrada Sandstone)
Floor grading, side slopes, Divider
Berm 1251 0 323
Unconsolidated tailings4 Stored waste 100 0 10
1 Soil strength parameters from Hydro-Engineering, LLC (2005b).
2 In place density from Tt-TP 29.
3 Conservative reduction of measured phi angle, 39 degrees, from direct shear tests on two composite samples of
wind blown weathered sandstone, and weathered sandstone, respectively.
4 Typical values for sand/slimes uranium tailings.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 37
5.9.2 Seepage Analyses
Seepage analyses were performed before the slope stability in order to determine the steady state
hydraulic conditions. The seepage analyses were conducted using the GeoStudio 2007 design software
(Version 7.12, Build 4143, GEO-SLOPE International, Ltd.). The seepage analyses were based upon
average clay, Entrada sandstone, sand, and tailings properties and geometries and do not account for the
effects of heterogeneities. Table 5-2 presents the saturated hydraulic conductivities and porosities for the
materials evaluated in the seepage models. The seepage analyses were conducted for the end of
construction and the end of tailings deposition cases prior to evaluating the slope stability cases for the
side slope, the Divider Berm, and the South Dam of the TSF and the embankment of the Process Ponds.
The water table at approximately 200 feet below the ground surface was selected as the initial condition
for each analysis.

Table 5-2. Design Material Properties for Seepage Analyses
Soil Type Use
k
cm/s Porosity
Clay Layer1
Layer overlying sand fill on side
slopes, Layer overlying sand fill on
Divider Berm
1 x 10-7 0.42
Entrada Sandstone2 Foundation and prepared
foundation 0.01 0.25
Natural Sands2 Prepared foundation of Process
Ponds 0.01 0.40
Compacted Sand Fill2
(On-site sands and excavated
Entrada Sandstone)
Floor grading, side slopes, Divider
Berm 0.01 0.40
Unconsolidated tailings(3) Stored waste 5 x 10-5 0.48
1 Required minimum permeability for BAT design
2 Typical permeability for Entrada Sandstone ranges from 1.7 x 10-4 cm/s to 1.7 cm/s. The typical porosity
ranges from 20 percent to 29 percent (Utah Division of Water Resources, West Colorado River Basin).
The porosity of the natural sands and compacted sand fill was assumed to be higher than that of the
sandstone.
3 Typical values from Keshian and Rager (1988) for hydraulically placed uranium tailings.

The soil-water characteristic curve (SWCC) relates the matric suction or negative suction in the soil to the
volumetric water content for each material or soil type in the seepage model. This relationship is
necessary to evaluate the hydraulic conditions in the unsaturated zone. The water table at the Shootaring
Canyon site is approximately 200 feet below the ground surface. The results of the steady state seepage
analyses for each case show negative pore water pressures in the soil near the ground surface on the order
of -12,000 psf. On the SWCC for Entrada sandstone, a matric suction of 12,000 psf corresponds to a
volumetric water content of 4.8 percent. This is equivalent to a gravimetric water content of 2.6 percent
for the Entrada sandstone. The 1977 data from Woodward Clyde measured the water content of the
sandstone as ranging from 2 percent to 3 percent at depths of 7 to 10 feet below the ground surface. The
recent geotechnical field investigation measured water contents of 2.2 percent to 5.7 percent for samples
S1 through S8 of weathered Entrada sandstone taken from depths ranging from 1.0 to 5.8 feet below
ground surface. The results of the seepage model are consistent with the past and current field conditions.

The seepage model was also run to determine the hydraulic condition after tailings deposition was
completed for the TSF and after filling of the Process Pond was completed. A one foot clay layer was
placed on top of the natural sands for the side slopes and the Divider Berm. The remaining layers of the
liner system were not included in the profiles for the seepage model simulations. For the side slopes,
Divider Berm, and the South Dam of the TSF, and the Process Ponds, the high soil suction acts like a

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 38
natural capillary barrier. The high negative pore water pressures remain in the Entrada sandstone after the
tailings are placed in the TSF and water is in the Process Ponds. These were the initial hydraulic
conditions used for the subsequent slope stability analyses.

5.9.3 Results of Slope Stability Analyses
Operational stability of TSF South Dam, Divider Berm, and side slopes, and of the Process Ponds was
analyzed assuming full failure of the liner systems except for the clay liner.

Slope stability was analyzed for the South Dam, side slopes, and the Divider Berm of the TSF and for the
west embankment of the South Process Pond for the end of construction phase and for the final stage of
operational deposition. Both static and pseudostatic analyses were conducted for both the upstream and
downstream faces of the embankments. The live load cases were applied to the TSF and Process Pond
cases. The results of slope stability analyses are summarized in Table 5-3 and 5-4 and presented
graphically in Appendix E.1 and E.2 for the TSF and Process Ponds, respectively.

Table 5-3. Results of Slope Stability Analyses for TSF
Safety Factor
Slope Static
Pseudostatic
(0.12g)
Figure
Number
Side Slopes
End of Construction
Live Load Analysis – 34 kip Axle Load
Live Load Analysis – Compactor Back of Slope
Live Load Analysis – Compactor Front of Slope
End of Tailings Deposition
Live Load Analysis – 34 kip Axle Load

1.6
1.6
1.6
1.3
2.3
2.0

1.2
-
-
-
1.3
-

E.1-2, E.1-3
E.1-4
E.1-5
E.1-6
E.1-8, E.1-9
E.1-10
South Dam1
End of Construction
Upstream Face
Live Load Analysis – 34 kip Axle Load
Downstream Face
End of Tailings Deposition
Upstream Face
Live Load Analysis – 34 kip Axle Load
Downstream Face

1.7
1.7
1.7

1.8
1.8
1.7

1.3
-
1.3

1.3
-
1.3

E.1-12, E.1-13
E.1-14
E.1-15, E.1-16

E.1-18, E.1-19
E.1-20
E.1-21, E.1-22
Divider Berm
End of Construction – South Face
Live Load Analysis – 34 kip Axle Load
Live Load Analysis – Compactor Back of Slope
Live Load Analysis – Compactor Front of Slope
End of Construction – North Face
Live Load Analysis – 34 kip Axle Load
Live Load Analysis – Compactor Back of Slope
Live Load Analysis – Compactor Front of Slope
End of Tailings Deposition – South Face
Live Load Analysis – 34 kip Axle Load
Live Load Analysis – Compactor Back of Slope
Live Load Analysis – Compactor Front of Slope
End of Tailings Deposition – North Face
Live Load Analysis – 34 kip Axle Load

1.6
1.3
1.6
1.2
1.6
1.2
1.6
1.2
1.7
1.4
1.6
1.2
1.6
1.6

1.2
-
-
-
1.2
-
-
-
1.2
-
-
-
1.2
-

E.1-24, E.1-25
E.1-26
E.1-27
E.1-28
E.1-29, E.1-30
E.1-31
E.1-32
E.1-33
E.1-35, E1-36
E.1-37
E.1-38
E.1-39
E.1-40, E.1-41
E1-42

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 39
Table 5-4. Results of Slope Stability Analyses for Process Ponds
Safety Factor
Slope Static
Pseudostatic
(0.12g)
Figure
Number
West bank of South Pond
End of Construction
West Face
Live Load Analysis – 34 kip Axle Load
East Face
Live Load Analysis – 34 kip Axle Load

1.6
1.5
1.7
1.7

1.2
-
1.2
-

E.2-2, E.2-3
E.2-4
E.2-5, E.2-6
E.2.7
West bank of South Pond
End of Phase I
West Face
Live Load Analysis – 34 kip Axle Load
EastFace
Live Load Analysis – 34 kip Axle Load

1.6
1.5
2.6
1.6

1.2
-
1.7

E.2-9, E.2-10
E.2-11
E.2-12, E.2-13
E.2-14
1 Upstream/downstream measured relative to global drainage channel

These results indicate acceptable safety factors for all of the slope configurations and tailings conditions
that are anticipated during the depositional life of the TSF and the Process Ponds.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 40
6.0 TAILINGS AND WATER MANAGEMENT
6.1 Tailings Deposition
Tailings slurry will be conveyed to the South Cell via a pipeline from the mill. Tailings will be conveyed
to a distribution station, and from there they will be distributed to the cell for deposition through headers
and spigots. The distribution station and dual header pipelines provide a means of controlling and
delivering the tailings to the cell during temporary shut down for maintenance or repair, thus allowing
continuous uninterrupted tailings discharge during mill operation.

Deposition of the tailings in the cell will be via conventional spigots. Tailings will be first deposited at
the floor of the cell to provide an initial protective cover for the exposed LCS drainage layer. The initial
tailings deposition will be performed in such a manner to minimize disturbance or erosion of the exposed
filter sand above the drainage gravel. After the LCS drainage materials have been sufficiently covered,
tailings discharge will take place primarily from the sides slopes along the perimeter of the cell. The
details and plans for tailings deposition are presented in the Operations Plan.

6.2 Tailings Production from Mill
Lyntek, Inc. performed the evaluation of the restart of the Shootaring Mill and has forecast that the
upgraded mill may produce up to 1,053,000 lbs of uranium per year (Lyntek, 2008). The average ore
processing rate is estimated as 500 to 750 tons/day. Based on average ore processing rate of 500
tons/day, the rate of discharge for the tailings solids and water are 20.8 and 21.5 tons/hr, respectively.
Based on an average ore processing rate of 750 tons/day, the rates of discharge of the tailings solids and
water are 31.3 and 32.3 tons/hr, respectively. These values assume a specific gravity of 2.7 for the solids
and 1.0 for the water.

Uranium One plans to recycle tailings water back to the mill via the leachate collection system. The
tailings water will also be used as dust control for the tailings cells during operation. The Process Ponds
may be used for temporary storage of tailings water during operations.

6.3 Water Balance
A detailed water and tailings mass balance computer model was developed for the TSF using the dynamic
modeling platform called GoldSim (V. 9.6. GoldSim Technology Group, LLC. Copyright 1998-2007).
A detailed water balance was also developed for the Process Ponds. The water balances for the TSF and
Process Ponds are discussed below in Sections 6.3.1 and 6.3.2, respectively.

GoldSim is a Windows-based computer program used to simulate engineering systems and is highly
suited to work with the system variability of a mine site as it is being constructed and operated. The
model simulates the key inflows and outflows to the system during the life of the mill. See Appendix F.1
for a more detailed description of the GoldSim Model using the TSF water balance.

6.3.1 TSF Water Balance
Inflows and outflows for the South Cell were modeled over the life of the cell for ore production rates of
500 and 750 tons/day and are discussed in more detail below. Operational parameters include:

1. Maintenance of a freeboard of 7.5 feet.
2. Tailings deposition begins May 1, 2009.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 41
6.3.1.1 TSF Model Inflows
Tailings Slurry – Tailings slurry was modeled for production rates of 43.3 and 63.6 tons/hr until the cell
was filled to an elevation of 4422.5, allowing for 7.5 feet of freeboard. The production rate is over 350
days per year. The tailings slurry is 49.2 percent solids by weight with a solids density of 97 lb/ft2. An
additional 100,000 cubic yards of existing contaminated soils at the site will be excavated and added to
the South Cell after it is complete. The rate of excavation is assumed to be approximately 1,380 yds3/day
for 60 days.

Return Water from Leachate Collection System – Water collected from the Leachate Collection
System (LCS) was conservatively modeled to be returned the TSF. Since the rate at which water is
removed from the system is the same as the rate at which it is returned to the system, the net effect on the
water balance is zero and, therefore, was not included in the water balance model.
Precipitation – Average monthly rainfall values were used to determine the precipitation contribution to
the tailings water pool. The precipitation rates (Table 6-1) used were from the water balance conducted
for the Tony M Mine (Tetra Tech, 2006). Appendix 2 from the Tony M Mine 2006 Report has been
attached as Appendix F.2 of this report for reference.

Table 6-1. Monthly Average Precipitation
Station Location
Month
Department
of Interior
Wahweap,
AZ Page, AZ
Mexican
Hat, UT Moab, UT
Piute Dam,
UT
Station Number 29114 26180 425582 425733 426897
Period of Record 1960-2005 1957-2005 1940-2005 1890-2005 1911-1970 Average
Jan 0.66 0.48 0.50 0.52 0.66 0.61 0.55
Feb 0.68 0.54 0.48 0.47 0.61 0.56 0.53
Mar 0.70 0.61 0.62 0.46 0.81 0.54 0.61
Apr 0.36 0.37 0.44 0.36 0.82 0.61 0.52
May 0.505 0.37 0.41 0.39 0.73 0.76 0.53
Jun 0.31 0.19 0.16 0.21 0.42 0.48 0.29
Jul 0.49 0.54 0.50 0.64 0.78 0.85 0.66
Aug 0.63 0.74 0.70 0.66 0.86 1.15 0.82
Sep 0.73 0.64 0.69 0.70 0.85 0.96 0.77
Oct 0.75 0.80 0.88 0.83 1.02 0.53 0.81
Nov 0.78 0.61 0.55 0.51 0.70 0.57 0.59
Dec 0.69 0.41 0.49 0.49 0.75 0.63 0.55
Annual 7.28 6.30 6.42 6.24 9.01 8.25 7.24

Precipitation falling on the lined impoundment area was modeled by multiplying the lined area by the
monthly rainfall. The precipitation collection area for the South Cell is 33.25 acres (see Appendix H.3).
Precipitation falling on the mill area will be routed to the South Cell via a diversion channel that
discharges into the northeast corner of the cell. Runoff produced by mill area precipitation was modeled
by multiplying the total area by the monthly average rainfall and the monthly runoff coefficient (see
Appendix H.3).

Precipitation in the remaining catchment areas above the South Cell will runoff into a diversion channel
along the west side of the impoundment and discharge north of the Divider Berm, and into a diversion
channel along the east side of the impoundment that discharges south of the existing South Dam.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 42
6.3.1.2 Model Outflows
The outflow from the TSF includes evaporation from the open water surface and water that becomes
permanently entrained in the tailings mass. The impoundment will be lined with a double 60 mil HDPE
liner, so no seepage or deep infiltration losses were incorporated into the water balance model.

Evaporation – Evaporative losses from the water pool were modeled by multiplying the impoundment
water pool area by the monthly evaporation rate. The evaporation rates (Table 6-2) used were estimated
from the water balance conducted for the Tony M. Mine (Tetra Tech, 2006). See Appendix F.2 for
discussion of estimation of the evaporation rates.

Table 6-2. Net Evaporation Rates
Weather Station Location
Month
Department
of Interior Wahweap Page
Mexican
Hat Moab
Piute
Dam
Station Number 29114 26180 425582 425733 426897
Period of Record 1962-1997 1963-1981 1958-1993 1959-1980 1920-1970
Estimated
Evap. for
Mine Site
January 2.54 2.5
February 2.72 2.7
March 3.10 4.29 3.58 3.2
April 4.24 6.39 5.79 5.80 4.53 4.8
May 5.10 9.26 7.71 8.02 6.59 5.52 7.1
June 6.89 10.91 9.64 9.84 8.02 7.11 8.8
July 7.71 11.01 9.36 9.62 8.26 6.56 8.8
August 8.37 10.05 7.78 7.77 6.77 5.23 7.3
September 7.47 7.20 5.50 5.67 4.53 4.23 5.0
October 5.25 4.96 3.00 3.17 2.91 3.1
November 3.42 2.56 1.13 0.89 2.5
December 3.31 2.4
Annual 60.12 66.63 53.49 50.77 38.70 31.55 58.2
Note: Evaporation rate data from surrounding weather stations was derived from a Class A pan evaporation data
using a evaporation pan factor of 0.70.

The surface area was calculated based on a volume versus surface area relationship developed for the cell
(Table 6-3). The total volume of material (solids and water) contained in the cell at any given time was
input into this relationship to calculate the surface area available for evaporation. The total volume in the
cell at each time step was calculated by summing the total solids, the volume of entrained water, and the
volume of water pool at each point in time.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 43
Table 6-3. Volume/Area/Elevation Relationship for the South Cell
South Cell
Elevation Area (sf) Total Volume (cf)
4363 18,243 -
4370 138,000 546,851
4380 377,256 3,123,131
4390 650,545 8,262,136
4400 929,617 16,162,946
4410 1,085,428 26,238,171
4420 1,209,713 37,713,876
4430 1,315,462 50,339,751

Entrained Water – Entrained water is the residual portion of the input water that is assumed to be held
within the pore spaces of the tailings and is not available as free water. The model assumes the placed
tailings remain saturated and that 26 percent of the discharged water is entrained within the solids.

Reclaimed Water – It was assumed that 100 percent of the water from the LCS will be reclaimed and run
back through the mill.

6.3.1.3 Results
Tailings are discharged into the South Cell until the cell is filled to elevation 4422.5 feet, allowing a
freeboard of 7.5 feet. A full listing of pond and surface elevations over time is provided in Appendix
F.3.1, Tables 1A and 1B for ore production rates of 500 and 750 tons/day, respectively. Inflow and
outflow rates over time is provided in Appendix F.3.1, Tables 2A and 2B for ore production rates of 500
and 750 tons/day, respectively.

The lifespan of the South Cell is 7.5 years for an ore production rate of 500 tons/day and is 3.8 years for
an ore production rate of 750 tons/day.

6.3.2 Process Pond Water Balance
Inflows and outflows for the Process Ponds were modeled over the life of the cell and are discussed in
more detail below. Operational parameters include:

1. Maintenance of a freeboard of 3.0 feet.
2. Process pond flows begin May 1, 2009.

6.3.2.1 Process Pond Model Inflows
Process Pond Fluids – The Process Ponds were designed for a flow rate from the mill for process fluids
estimated by Lyntek as 20 gpm over 24 hours, 350 days/year for the life of the TSF. The design of the
Process Ponds assumed the most conservative case of no return of process streams to the mill and a
lifespan of 7.5 years to correspond with an ore production rate of the TSF of 750 tons/day.

Precipitation – Average monthly rainfall values were used to determine the precipitation contribution to
the Process Ponds. The precipitation rates provided above in Table 6-1 were used for the water balance
model.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 44
Precipitation falling on the lined Process Pond areas was modeled by multiplying the lined area by the
monthly rainfall. Precipitation on the berms and remaining catchment areas surrounding the Process
Ponds will runoff away from the Process Ponds.

6.3.2.2 Model Outflows
The outflow from the Process Ponds includes evaporation from the open water surface. The ponds will be
lined with a double 60 mil HDPE liner, so no seepage or deep infiltration losses were incorporated into
the water balance model.

Evaporation – Evaporative losses from the water surface were modeled by multiplying the water surface
areas by the monthly evaporation rate. The evaporation rates provided above in Table 6-2 were used in
the model.

The surface area was calculated based on a volume versus surface area relationship developed for the
ponds (Table 6-4). The total volume of water contained in the pond at any given time was input into this
relationship to calculate the surface area available for evaporation.

Table 6-4. Volume/Area/Elevation Relationship for the Process Ponds
North Process Pond South Process Pond
Elevation Area (sf)
Total Volume
(cf) Elevation Area (sf)
Total
Volume (cf)
4474 1268 - 4465 41 -
4475 19905 10,587 4466 12,541 6,291
4476 58,773 49,926 4468 63,706 82,538
4477 91,271 124,948 4470 79,545 225,789
4478 105,148 223,157 4472 87,052 392,386
4479 109,034 330,248 4474 94,849 574,287
4480 113,084 441,307 4476 102,935 772,071
4481 117,200 556,449 4478 111,307 986,313
4482 121,382 675,740 4480 119,952 1,217,572
4484 129,943 927,065 4482 128,858 1,466,382
4486 138,768 1,195,776 4484 138,025 1,733,265
4488 147,856 1,482,400 4485 142,706 1,873,631

Reclaimed Water – It was assumed that 0 percent of the water will be reclaimed and run back through
the mill.

6.3.2.3 Results
Process fluids are discharged into the Process Ponds for a lifespan of 7.5 years maintaining a freeboard of
3.0 feet. A full listing of water elevations over time is provided in Appendix F.3.2, Tables 1A and 1B for
the North and South Process Ponds, respectively.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 45
7.0 LINER SYSTEM DESIGN
7.1 Liner System Description
7.1.1 Tailings Storage Facility
Utah Administrative Code Rule R317-6 (10 CFR 40 Appendix A, Criterion 5A(1)) requires the use of a
liner system under the tailings that “is designed, constructed, and installed to prevent any migration of
wastes out of the impoundment to the adjacent subsurface soil, ground water, or surface water at any time
during the active life (including the closure period) of the impoundment”. This performance criterion is
met by the design of a multilayered liner system with two geomembranes consisting of high-density
polyethylene (HDPE). This liner system is consistent with Best Available Technology (BAT) for liner
systems. The liner system includes a leachate collection system (above the upper HDPE geomembrane)
and a leak detection system (between the HDPE geomembranes).

Tailings fluid collected in the leachate collection system will be either (1) recycled to the process circuit,
(2) discharged to evaporation ponds, or (3) retained within the TSF to submerge portions of the tailings
during operation. The leak detection design provides monitoring of fluids between HDPE geomembranes
and removal of fluids (if detected) to remove the gradient for flow across the lower HDPE geomembrane.
This significantly reduces the probability of leachate reaching underlying groundwater.

HDPE geomembrane was selected for superior performance for durability and low permeability. The
components of the liner system listed from the bottom to the top, are shown in Figure 7-1 and described
below:

• Minimum 12-inch compacted clay liner, serving as the base layer
• Secondary 60-mil HDPE geomembrane, overlaying the clay liner to form a composite liner
• HDPE geonet and 3-inch diameter HDPE perforated pipe for the leak detection system (LDS)
• Primary 60 mil HDPE geomembrane
• Cushioning layer consisting of two 10 ounce nonwoven geotextile(s)
• Leachate collection system (LCS) consisting of 4-inch to 8-inch diameter HDPE perforated pipe
in gravel bedding
• Minimum of 18 inch-thick layer of drainage gravel
• Minimum of 6-inch thick sand filter layer to separate tailings from the drainage layer

Preparation of the TSF liner system construction is outlined in detail in the Construction Quality Control
and Quality Assurance (QCQA) Plan included with this submittal. Detailed specifications for each liner
component are included in the Technical Specifications included with this submittal.

The components of the liner system and the design of the LCS and LDS are described in Sections 7.2
through 7.7.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 46
7.1.2 Process Ponds
The liner system for the Process Ponds is the same as for the TSF, except there is not a LCS. An 18-inch
layer of gravel will be placed in the bottom of the ponds to allow for cleanout of the ponds, if necessary.
The gravel layer will be underlain with an 8-ounce per square yard geotextile cushioning layer. The
components of the liner system listed from the bottom to the top, are shown in Figure 7-2 and described
below:

• Minimum 12-inch compacted clay liner, serving as the base layer
• Secondary 60-mil HDPE geomembrane, overlaying the clay liner to form a composite liner
• HDPE geonet for the leak detection system (LDS)
• Primary 60 mil HDPE geomembrane
• Cushioning layer consisting of a 10-ounce per square yard nonwoven geotextile
• Minimum of 18 inch-thick layer of gravel

Preparation of the Process Ponds liner system construction is outlined in detail in the Construction
Quality Control and Quality Assurance (QCQA) Plan included with this submittal. Detailed
specifications for each liner component are included in the Technical Specifications included with this
submittal.

The components of the liner system and the design of the LDS are described in Sections 7.2 through 7.7.

7.2 Clay Liner
The composite liner system for the TSF and the Process Ponds contains a low-permeability clay liner over
which the geosynthetic components are deployed. Initially this soil layer was proposed to consist of 12
inches of compacted clay. However, the alternative use of a clay/sand mixture was found advantageous
as this alternative allows maximized utilization of the limited quantity of on-site clay materials and results
in several improved engineering characteristics relative to using clay alone. The selected clay/sand
mixture will be used to construct a minimum 12-inch thick soil liner subject to the following
specifications: (1) maximum particle size of 1 inch, (2) minimum of 30 percent passing the No. 200
sieve, (3) minimum plasticity index of 10, and (4) maximum field hydraulic conductivity of 1 x 10-7 cm/s
when compacted within an acceptable zone of dry unit weight and moisture content. Further details
regarding the proposed soil liner materials and development of an acceptable zone for compaction of the
selected mixture are discussed in the following sections.

7.2.1 Material Properties
The material specified for the South Cell low-permeability clay liner is a blended mixture containing 55 ±
5 percent (by weight) on-site clay and 45 ± 5 percent on-site sand. The clay and sand borrow areas,
shown on Figure 2-15B, are located within the proposed future expansion area (denoted North Cell) and
the South Cell, respectively. Use of the clay/sand mixture in lieu of the clay alone is advantageous for
several reasons, most notably a reduction in the potential for desiccation cracking. For example, X-ray
diffraction results for the on-site clay (see Appendix G.2) indicate that the clay contains a large fraction
(i.e., >70 percent) of highly active clay minerals, namely montmorillonite and mixed-layered
illite/smectite. Furthermore, based on liquid limit and plasticity index values (see Table 7-1), the on-site
clay borrow material classifies as a fat (i.e., high plasticity) clay with sand according to the Unified Soil
Classification System (USCS). These characteristics, while excellent for providing low permeability,
render a liner constructed only of clay susceptible to possible degradation in permeability (i.e., increased)
due to desiccation cracking.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 47
Table 7-1. Summary of Index Properties and Classifications of Constituent Soils Samples,
Composited Samples, and Blends for Low-Permeability Clay Liner
Index and Classification Properties
Sample or Material ID
Fines Content
(%)2
Liquid
Limit (%)
Plasticity
Index (%) USCS Classification
C1 through C71 82.8
(75.7 - 88.6) 66 (56 - 75) 41 (36 - 49) Fat Clay to Fat with Sand
(CH)
Clay 1
(Composite of clay samples
C2, C3, C5, & C7)
83.9 75 49 Fat Clay with Sand (CH)
S1 through S71 17.1
(13.5 - 22.7) Non-Plastic Silty Sand (SM)
Sand 1
(Composite of sand samples
S1, S3, S4, & S5)
19.6 Non-Plastic Silty Sand (SM)
40/60 Clay/Sand Mixture 43.9 33 16 Clayey Sand (SC)
50/50 Clay/Sand Mixture 50.7 35 18 Sandy Lean Clay (CL)
60/40 Clay/Sand Mixture 61.2 42 24 Sandy Lean Clay (CL)
Notes:
1. Average value provided. Range of values indicated in parentheses.
2. Includes silt and clay size particles.

The design clay/sand mixture was developed based, in part, upon laboratory index testing of three
mixtures with the following proportions: (1) 40 percent clay, 60 percent sand; (2) 50 percent clay, 50
percent sand; and (3) 60 percent clay, 40 percent sand. The mixtures were prepared in the laboratory
using clay composited from test pit samples C2, C3, C5, and C7 (composite denoted Clay 1) and sand
composited from test pit samples S1, S3, S4, and S5 (composite denoted Sand 1). These individual
samples were chosen because their fines contents and plasticity indices were among the lowest of the
samples collected for each soil type. A summary of index properties and classification testing for the
individual clay and sand samples, Clay 1 and Sand 1 composite samples, and the clay/sand mixtures is
presented in Table 7-1. As shown in Table 7-1, the mixtures easily meet the minimum requirements for
fines content (i.e., ≥ 30 percent) and plasticity index (i.e., > 10), but also exhibit a plasticity index less
than 30, which is considerably better in terms of desiccation potential. Moreover, use of a clay/sand
mixture is expected to improve workability and shear strength while still providing an acceptable
permeability.

7.2.2 Liner Material Processing and Placement
The design clay/sand mixture will be processed by blending the clay and sand on a mixing pad prior to
placement and compaction. To prevent the soils being blended from contamination by excavation into the
native subgrade, the subgrade for the mixing pad will be prepared by placing clay and sand taken from the
respective borrows. The clay and sand will be spread over the mixing pad footprint in alternate 6-inch
loose lifts, and the resulting 12-inch loose lift will be mixed thoroughly with a soil mixer/stabilizer (i.e.,
CAT RM-300 or equivalent). The blended soils will be moisture-conditioned by adding water during the
mixing process and will then be compacted to produce a compacted mixing pad thickness not less than 8
inches.

Once the mixing pad subgrade is prepared, additional layers of mixed soil will be processed in a similar
manner (i.e., spreading alternating loose lifts of clay and sand followed by mixing/moisture-conditioning
with the soil stabilizer and water truck). Each processed lift will be subjected to quality assurance/quality

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 48
control (QA/QC) testing as outlined in the Technical Specifications and QA/QC Plan to ensure that the
mixture contains an acceptable amount of fines and moisture. After the material is properly mixed and
moisture-conditioned, this process will be continued until a minimum of three feet of sand/clay mixture
has been constructed.

When construction of the soil liner begins, the prepared clay/sand materials will be removed from the
mixing pad, spread, and graded in maximum 8-inch-thick loose lifts and then compacted until a minimum
12-inch thickness is achieved. The completed lower lift(s) will be wetted prior to placement of
subsequent materials to ensure adequate lift bonding. The placement and compaction of each lift will be
monitored and tested to assure material specifications are met.

7.2.3 Liner Material Compaction
The low-permeability soil liner will be constructed using wet-side (i.e., wet-of-optimum) compaction to
obtain a field hydraulic conductivity, kfield, of 1x10-7 cm/s or less. The compaction specification (see
Technical Specifications) is an end-product specification, or acceptable zone (AZ), developed based on
the “line of optimums” approach described by Benson et al. (1999). The line-of-optimums approach has
been used in this design to provide confidence that (1) the kfield of the constructed liner will be 10-7 cm/s
or less, and (2) small-scale laboratory hydraulic conductivity, klab, test results utilized as the basis for
design provide an adequate prediction of the actual kfield (i.e., scale effects are minimized). Benson et al.
(1999) demonstrate that deviations between klab values for small samples and kfield values of a constructed
liner (measured using infiltrometer or borehole tests in the field, or laboratory tests performed on large-
diameter samples extracted from the liner) typically are small if the liner is constructed wet of the line of
optimums.

The line-of-optimums approach involves laboratory compaction testing of the liner material to determine
the maximum dry unit weight, γdmax, and optimum moisture content, wopt, using three levels of compactive
energy. The three laboratory compactive energies, from highest to lowest, are modified (ASTM D1557),
standard (ASTM D698), and reduced (approximately 50 percent of standard energy). The line of
optimums connects the wopt for the different compaction energies and serves as the lower bound of
compaction moisture content for a given dry unit weight, γd, (i.e., the left-most boundary of the
preliminary AZ; see Figure 7-3). The zero-air-voids curve represents the upper bound of compaction
moisture content for a given γd (i.e., the right-most boundary of the preliminary AZ; see Figure 7-3). The
minimum dry unit weight (i.e., the bottom boundary of the final AZ in Figure 7-3) is established after
conducting laboratory hydraulic conductivity tests on the compacted test specimens. Once finalized, the
AZ should encompass only those specimens that exhibit an acceptable klab (e.g., k ≤ 10-7 cm/s in Figure 7-
3).

The results of all compaction tests and corresponding klab tests performed on the three clay/sand mixtures
are summarized in Table 7-2 and included in Appendix G.2. As shown in Table 7-2, several wet-of-
optimum compaction test specimens were subjected to laboratory hydraulic conductivity tests. Since
compaction dry of the line of optimums will not be allowed in the field laboratory hydraulic conductivity
testing of dry-of-optimum specimens was unnecessary. All laboratory hydraulic conductivity tests were
performed in flexible-wall permeameters, in accordance with ASTM D5084 Method C (i.e., falling
headwater-rising tailwater). The average effective stress, σ'avg, on each specimen was approximately 5 psi
and the hydraulic gradient, i, was less than 30 in all cases. Specimens were permeated until ASTM
D5084 termination criteria were achieved. The results show that all of the klab values are less than 10-7
cm/s. However, given that the klab value for the standard compaction test specimen containing 40 percent
clay was only slightly less than 10-7 cm/s, the mixture with 40 percent clay was eliminated from further
consideration. The klab values for the specimens containing 50 percent clay and 60 percent clay all were ≤
3.8x10-8 cm/s, including the specimens compacted using reduced compactive energy. A maximum klab of

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 49
5x10-8 cm/s is considered adequate for ensuring a kfield of 10-7 cm/s or less using the line of optimums
approach. Therefore, these data form the basis for selection of a mixture containing 55 ± 5 percent clay
and 45 ± 5 percent sand as the design mixture for the low-permeability soil liner.

Table 7-2. Summary of Laboratory Testing for Clay/Sand Mixtures
Clay/Sand
Mixture
Compactive
Energy
Compacted Specimens
Maximum Dry
Unit Weight
(pcf)
Optimum
Water
Content (%)
Dry Unit
Weight (pcf)
Water
Content (%)
Hydraulic
Conductivity
(cm/s)
40/60 Standard
104.5 14.9
106.1 17.8
105.7 16.9
106.2 19.0 8.5 x 10-8
104.5 20.4
100.4 23.1
50/50
Reduced
94.3 18.5
97.9 23.6
95.9 20.6
97.7 22.3
97.7 23.8 1.1 x 10-8
94.6 26.6
Standard
101.9 14.4
103.5 19.1
103.0 16.8
103.5 18.3 3.8 x 10-8
103.0 21.2
101.1 23.1 6.0 x 10-9
97.6 25.1
Modified
111.0 10.4
116.7 13.8
114.8 12.6
117.2 13.6 2.6 x 10-8
114.5 16.0
110.6 18.1 5.6 x 10-9
60/40
Reduced
92.8 19.5
94.8 24.7
93.6 21.8
94.2 23.3
94.7 25.6 7.5 x 10-9
92.6 27.1
Standard
98.9 16.9
101.7 20.7
101.1 19.2
102.1 21.2 1.9 x 10-8
100.2 22.9
97.9 24.6 7.4 x 10-9
Modified
113.0 11.4
116.3 14.0
116.2 12.8
115.8 15.2 5.8 x 10-9
112.3 17.5
109.1 19.6 7.2 x 10-9

The final AZ for the South Cell compacted clay liner is illustrated in Figure 7-4. The minimum dry unit
weight (i.e., the bottom boundary of the AZ has been set at 97.5 pcf, which represents a relative
compaction of at least 95 percent for mixtures with clay contents between 50 and 60 percent (based on
standard compaction energy). Also, the minimum and maximum water contents have been set at 14 and
25 percent, respectively. These restrictions and line-of-optimums boundary result in a smaller AZ than

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 50
indicated based on the klab data (i.e., several specimens with acceptable klab values are excluded from the
AZ) but will help to ensure adequate workability and shear strength.

7.3 Secondary HDPE Liner
A 60-mil HDPE geomembrane will be installed above the clay liner to provide a composite liner below
the LDS for both the TSF and the Process Ponds. The geomembrane will be textured on both sides to
provide additional stability and to facilitate construction.

7.4 Leak Detection System (LDS)
Tailings Storage Facility. The LDS is designed to intercept leachate that passes through defects in the
primary liner (if present). The LDS consists of a geonet drain, overlying the secondary composite liner of
HDPE geomembrane and compacted clay. The geonet drain is intercepted by 3-inch diameter perforated
HDPE pipe where necessary to collect solution from the geonet drain. The layout of the LDS is shown in
Drawings L1 and L3.

The LDS in the south cell has been subdivided into four subareas by overall site grading, or the use of
small berms. The separation berms will be constructed as small (approximately 1 foot high) ridges on top
of the compacted clay liner, and will be overlain with the full thickness of drainage system. Any leakage
from a subarea will report to a separate subcell within the LDS sump system. Should the Action Leakage
Rate (ALR) be exceeded in any sump, the subarea contributing to the flow can be identified for repair or
abandoned.

An HDPE geonet will be used for leak detection through the primary HDPE geomembrane. The
specifications for the geonet will be provided in the Technical Specifications. Specifically, the geonet
will require a minimum transmissivity of 3.3 x 10-3 m2/s. The calculations for the LDS capacity are
discussed in 7.4.2. The leak detection system is designed to handle flow significantly greater than the
established ALR of 130 gallons per acre per day.

The main collectors of the LDS will carry fluid to separate sumps. Each sump is constructed as a dual
sump with separate collection areas for the leak detection discharge and the leachate collection discharge.
The LDS sump will be divided into 4 separate chambers to collect leakage from the 4 individual drainage
areas. Within the composite sump, there are four 12-inch diameter access pipes for pump installation and
instrumentation within the leak detection sump and one 12-inch diameter access pipe for pump
installation and instrumentation within the leachate collection sump, for a total of five pump installation
pipes for the composite sump. The instrumentation access pipes will be used for installation of water level
monitoring equipment.

Process Ponds. The layout of the LDS of the Process Ponds is shown in Drawings L5. The geonet of the
Process Ponds will function similarly to and will be specified identical to the geonet in the TSF. There is
no LCS for the Process Ponds.

7.4.1 Action Leakage Rates
Tailings Storage Facility. Giroud et al. (1997) and U.S. EPA (1992) present a method for estimating
leakage through the primary liner for a properly installed and functioning liner system. Although there is
a minute rate of leakage through HDPE through permeation or diffusion, the permeation rate is
insignificant when contrasted with the leakage through small punctures or defects in the installed liner. As
presented in Appendix G.1, assuming a small hole diameter of 0.079 in (2 mm), a total head of 18 inches,
and a hole density of 1 hole per acre results in an ALR of 130 gal/day/acre.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 51

The ALR of 130 gal/day/acre can be converted to a Sump Action Leakage Rate (SALR) by taking the
product of the ALR and the area contributing to the sump. There are a total of four sumps for tailings cells
SD1 through SD4 as shown in Drawings L1 and L4. Table 7-3 presents the maximum leakage capture
area for each sump and the SALR for each sump.

Table 7-3. Sump Action Leakage Rate for All Cells
SALR
Sump
Liner Area
(acre) (gal/day) (gal/min)
SD1 7.35 955 0.66
SD2 5.42 705 0.49
SD3 6.41 833 0.58
SD4 11.97 1556 1.08

If the SALR is exceeded for any sump, a series of steps will be taken to reduce the rate of discharge from
the leak detection system. If the change in rate of discharge from the leak detection system is fairly
abrupt, it may indicate a new contact with a liner puncture. In an area of recent tailings placement or
tailings solution ponding, the liner will be examined for damage. This may include excavating through
recently placed tailings or evacuating ponded tailings solution to try to expose the area of the liner where
the leak is likely to be located. If a damaged section of liner is located, the liner will be repaired and
tested. During this process, the location of tailings placement will be changed or the tailings placement
will be suspended. If the contributing punctures in the primary liner cannot be located, all ponded tailings
solution will be pumped from the suspect area to an adjacent cell or to the most distant practical location
within the cell. If the rate of discharge to the leak detection subsequently declines to acceptable levels,
restrictions will be placed on the moisture content of tailings that can be placed with the area of the cell
where the leak occurred. Only reduced moisture tailings will be allowed to be placed in the section of the
cell contributing to the sump where the allowable leak detection rate was exceeded. No ponding of
solution will be allowed within the section of the cell contributing to the leak detection sump.

Based on the SALRs presented in Table 7-3, and incorporating a factor of safety of 3, the required pump
capacity for the leak detection system on each sub-cell is between 1.5 and 3.3 gpm. There is a wide
variety of 4-inch diameter submersible pumps available with sufficient Total Dynamic Head (TDH) to
service the evacuation of the leakage detection sump. The pumped discharge from the leakage detection
sump will be metered with a combination totalizing/instantaneous meter and discharged to the tailings
pond surface for disposal through evaporation or recycled through the mill. The preliminary frequency of
sump evacuation for active tailings areas will be once per day with a daily record of evacuated volume.
The frequency may be reduced to a weekly evacuation and recording if the total evacuated volume is less
than the daily SALR for the sump. Fluid-level monitoring equipment will be installed in the leak
detection sump prior to operation of the corresponding tailings cell area. The fluid-level monitoring
equipment will, at a minimum, provide a measurement of the depth of fluid in the sump and an adjustable
alarm level to activate a light or siren type alarm. The fluid level monitoring equipment may also
incorporate features to allow pump control. Acceptable fluid-level monitoring equipment may include
suitable pressure transducers or transmitters. After a period of record for evacuation is established, level
controls within the sump access pipes may be installed or existing controls adjusted to automate the pump
operation and evacuation process provided an alarm system remains in place to clearly indicate excessive
fluid levels. The leakage detection fluid evacuation equipment will be inspected daily after a sump is
activated and this will continue as long as there is measurable discharge to the leakage detection sump.
SOP-AP3 details the inspection procedures.

Process Ponds. The ALR for the north and south Process Ponds was calculated using the same
procedures, hole diameter, and hole density as for the TSF. The ALR is highly dependant on the depth of

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 52
fluid in the Process Ponds. As presented in Appendix G.1, the maximum ALR of the north Process Pond
is 7.1 gal/min, and 8.9 gal/min for the south Process Pond.

7.4.2 Performance of LDS
Capacity of geonet. Leakage through the primary liner will be conveyed by the LDS consisting of geonet
and perforated piping. The maximum steady state-state rate of leachate migration through a single defect
in the primary liner that the geonet can accommodate without being filled with leachate at the point of the
defect can be calculated using the method presented by Giroud et al. (1997). In addition, total flow
capacity of the geonet at a gradient equivalent to the cell floor was evaluated. Both analyses, presented in
Appendix G.1, indicate the geonet has sufficient capacity to convey expected flows.

Capacity of leak detection pipe. As the flow path within a unit width of geonet increases, the anticipated
leakage flow rate will also increase, until the geonet is overwhelmed. To prevent the geonet from
reaching its flow capacity, the geonet is intercepted at intervals by a perforated leak detection pipe. The
LDS pipe will carry flow at a minimum slope of 1 percent to the sump. The LDS pipe capacity is
calculated using Manning’s equation, assuming a 3-inch diameter HDPE pipe, with a roughness
coefficient of 0.01, and a minimum pipe slope of 0.01 ft/ft.

The LDS geonet and pipe capacities and associated factors of safety are summarized in Appendix G.1.
All factors of safety are adequate to ensure that the anticipated Action Leakage Rates reporting to each
sump area are well within the capacity of the LDS components. In addition, fluid head within the LDS
will be contained within the geonet and LDS pipe, and therefore the anticipated Action Leakage Rates
will result in fluid head on the secondary liner well below the regulatory requirement of one foot.

Fluid head on secondary liner. Average head on the secondary liner was calculated using methods
presented by Giroud et al. (1997), and as a function of capacity of the geonet. Both procedures indicate
the fluid head is contained within the geonet itself, which is specified as having a minimum thickness of
300 mil (7.6 mm). This depth of fluid is well below the requirement of 12 inches or less of fluid head on
the lower liner.

Timely Detection of Leaks. The design of the leak detection system allows for leaks to report to the sump
within approximately 5 hours. This time frame is considered adequate in order to detect leakage in a
timely fashion. Calculations are presented in Appendix G.1.

7.5 Primary HDPE Geomembrane Liner
The primary liner above the LDS for both the TSF and Process Ponds will be a 60-mil HDPE
geomembrane. The geomembrane will be textured on both sides to provide additional stability and to
facilitate construction.

7.6 Cushioning Layer for Primary HDPE Geomembrane Liner
Cushioning calculations were performed for the primary liner for the TSF and Process Ponds to determine
the geotextile thicknesses required to cushion the primary liner from the overlying 18-inch gravel layer.
The liner cushioning calculations are provided in Appendix G.2. For the TSF, two 10-ounce per square
yard nonwoven geotextiles are recommended based maximum tailing thicknesses for the proposed
ultimate design (110 feet of tailings and cover). Based on the cushioning calculations for the TSF and a
maximum pool height for the Process Ponds of 17 feet, a 10-ounce per square yard nonwoven geotextile
is recommended as the cushioning layer for the primary liner for the Process Ponds. A cushioning layer
is not required for the sideslopes of the TSF and Process Ponds since there is not a gravel layer on the

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 53
sideslopes. A cushioning layer is also not required for the anchor trenches since the Entrada formation
will be used for the backfill of the anchor trenches (see Appendix G.2 for more detailed discussion and
calculations).

7.7 Leachate Collection System (LCS)
In order to limit the amount of head on the primary liner and to decrease time to dewater the tailings, a
LCS has been designed. The LCS consists of 4-inch to 8-inch diameter perforated HDPE pipe encased in
18 inches of drainage gravel. Six inches of filter sand will be placed over the gravel to prevent piping of
tailings into the drainage gravel. The LCS will be placed on the floor of the cells. Due to the steepness of
the side slopes (2.5H:1V), leachate accumulation on the side slopes will be relatively small, and therefore
the LCS will not extend up the side slopes of the cells. The minimum spacing between pipes has been
designed to limit the head on the primary liner to 18 inches or less (thickness of the gravel drain). The
size of the pipe has been designed to carry all of the predicted leachate at half the pipe capacity.
Additional pipe capacity and flow through the drainage gravel add redundancy in the LCS design.

The main leachate collectors will carry leachate to the LCS sump. The layout of the LCS is shown in
Drawing L2. Details of the LCS system are shown on Drawing L3 and L4. Details of the leachate
collection sump construction are shown on Drawing L4.

The maximum drainage distance to a collection pipe along the base of the cell(s) is limited to 80 feet or
less. The gravel drain around the pipes will also provide substantial conveyance capacity to supplement
that in the pipes.

7.7.1 Drainage Aggregate
The drainage gravel serves the following functions: (1) providing a continuous drainage layer at the base
of the tailings to prevent build-up of head on the primary liner, (2) adding drainage capacity to Leachate
Collection System, (3) preventing intrusion of tailings into the 0.25-inch slots in the perforated drainage
pipe, (4) guarding the HDPE liner against penetration of stones or other objects, and (5) protecting the
HDPE liner against damage from construction equipment. The gradation envelope that represents
acceptable particle sizes for the drainage gravel is shown in Figure 7-5. The drainage gravel will have a
maximum particle size (D100) of 1 inch, in order to protect the integrity of the primary HDPE liner. The
minimum particle size is designed to meet filter criteria with the pipe perforations of 0.25 inches,
according to guidance given in the National Engineering Handbook, Part 633, Chapter 26 “Gradation
Design of Sand and Gravel Filters” (USDA, 1994).

The drainage gravel will be placed on the floor of the lined cells. The drainage gravel will not be placed
on the side slopes of the lined cells.

7.7.2 Sand Filter
The sand filter is designed to prevent migration of tailings material into the pore spaces of the drainage
gravel. The Tailings Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan (Hydro-Engineering, 2005b) presented the
gradation results from three tailings samples. These gradations are shown in Figure 7-5. As the milling
process that produced these tailings is similar to the process that will produce future tailings at the site, it
is reasonable to assume that these gradations represent likely gradations of whole tailing samples of future
tailings. As the tailings are discharged, tailings will segregate with the coarser fraction settling out close
to the discharge point, and the finer fraction settling out at further locations. Therefore, it is likely that a
finer gradation than that presented in the Tailings Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan will exist at
discrete locations. In order to estimate this finer fraction, the gradation from sample T4 was adjusted to
represent the finest 50 percent of the whole gradation (i.e. the smallest 50 percent of the tailings settle out

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 54
at a location far from discharge point). This adjusted gradation is shown on Figure 7-5. From this
adjusted gradation, a gradation envelope for filter sand meeting filter criteria with both the fine tailings
and the drainage gravel was developed using criteria presented in USDA (1994). These gradations are all
shown in Figure 7-5.

7.7.3 Collection Piping Fluid Capacity
Expected discharge rates from the mill to the TSF is approximately 176 gpm of slurry, at a solids content
of 49 percent. The net result is approximately 127 gpm of fluid, and 49 gpm of solids (Lyntek, 2007).
The proposed LCS consists of 4-inch diameter perforated pipe placed on a 40-foot spacing within the
lowest portions of the TSF floor, with the spacing increasing to a 80-foot spacing elsewhere. The
capacity of a 4-inch diameter pipe placed at a minimum 1 percent grade is approximately 110 gpm.
Therefore, during initial discharge, the liquid portion of the slurry will flow across the upper surface of
the leachate collection system gravel. As it travels downgradient, it will percolate into the drainage
gravel. It will travel a maximum distance of 20 to 40 feet (depending on discharge location) before the
majority of the flow is intercepted by a perforated pipe and carried to the sump. The amount of flow
above the capacity of a single 4-inch pipe will continue to travel downgradient until it is intercepted by a
second pipe. Between any two pipes of the leachate collection system, there is adequate capacity to
convey the maximum expected flow of 127 gpm of fluid.

Once the floor of the TSF has been covered by tailings, the maximum leachate flow rate will be a function
of the maximum anticipated gradient within the tailings, and the saturated hydraulic conductivity of the
tailings. Under the highest anticipated gradient within the tailings (conservatively estimate to be 2 under
ponded conditions), and estimated hydraulic conductivity of the tailings of approximately 2 x 10-5 cm/s,
the highest leachate flow rate under saturated conditions is expected to be approximately 1.3 x 10-6 cfs per
square foot of placed tailings. The leachate collection system consists of 4-inch perforated collector pipes
placed at 40-foot to 80-foot spacings. Leachate within the 4-inch pipe will flow downgradient to a main
collector pipe. Required pipe diameters were calculated using Manning’s equation, considering
anticipated flows from tributary areas, a roughness coefficient of 0.01 for HDPE pipe, and a minimum of
factor of safety of two. Table 7-4 below summarizes the leachate collection pipe sizes. Calculations are
provided in Appendix G.1.
Table 7-4. Leachate Collection Pipe Sizes
Pipe Segment Design Pipe Size (in)
4-inch Collector 4
S1 5
S2 5
S3 7
S4 6
S5 5
S6 6

7.7.4 Limiting Head on Primary Liner
During initial discharge of tailings, the maximum fluid levels will essentially be the height of the drainage
gravel and filter sand, or 24 inches, above the primary liner. As the fluid runs across the surface of the
filter sand, it will percolate down into the gravel, and then be intercepted by the perforated LCS pipe and
carried to the sump. The maximum fluid level is below the operational requirement of a 3-foot maximum
head on the primary HDPE geomembrane liner, as summarized in Utah DEQ (2007).

After the floor of the TSF is covered by tailings, fluid pressure on the primary liner will be minimized by
controlling the spacing of the 4-inch LCS collection pipes. Pipe spacing was determined using the

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 55
McWhorter-Sunada equation (Strachan and Dorey, 1988) as presented in Appendix G.1. The maximum
allowable head on the primary liner was limited to 18 inches, in order to contain the saturated zone within
the drainage gravel.

The hydraulic conductivity of tailings was estimated from literature values for hydraulically placed
uranium tailings (Keshian and Rager, 1988). As the tailings are discharged into the tailings storage
facility, the coarser tailings will settle out near the discharge location, and the finer slimes will settle out
at further locations. Therefore, the hydraulic conductivity at discrete locations will vary significantly.
However, as the discharge locations are moved within the facility, a typical column of tailings above the
primary liner is expected to have a composite vertical hydraulic conductivity comparable to typical values
for fine sands to a combination of sand/slime. From Keshian and Rager (1988), the vertical hydraulic
conductivity is estimated to vary from between 2 x 10-5 cm/s to 1 x 10-4 cm/s.

Tailings discharge procedures will result in ponding of tailings fluid upon the tailings. Water balance
results indicate that the ratio of ponded fluid to consolidating tailings may approach a value of 0.3 to 1.0
during the initial portions of tailings discharge. This ratio results in a maximum gradient in the tailings of
1.3. Calculations for the LCS conservatively assumed the gradient could be as high as two.

The pipe spacing calculation results in a required pipe spacing of 40 to 80 feet. The 40-foot spacing is
incorporated in the lower swale portions of the basin floor, while the 80-foot spacing is incorporated in
the upper portions.

7.7.5 Additional Pumping Capacity
During initial operations of the tailings storage facility (TSF), much of the gravel of the leachate
collection system will be exposed. During this time, fluid from direct precipitation falling on the TSF,
and runoff from the mill area will flow directly into the drainage gravel and pond in the lower portion of
the cell. This critical time period will occur, to a lesser degree as time progresses, until the drainage
gravel is completely covered. Once the gravel is covered, fluid will pond on top of the tailings, and
infiltrate into the leachate collection system at a rate proportional to the hydraulic conductivity of, and the
hydraulic gradient through, the tailings.

A temporary pumping system consisting of pumps operating from a barge placed on ponded areas of the
TSF has been designed to evacuate the precipitation from a 50-year, 24-hour storm event within 72 hours.
The resulting volume of water associated with this storm event is approximately 4,272,000 gallons. The
high-flow pump capacity necessary to accomplish removal of this volume of water is approximately 990
gpm. The pumps should be on-hand while the drainage layer is exposed, and will pump the accumulated
water to the Process Ponds.

7.7.6 Piping Structural Design
The standard leachate collection system piping will be perforated 4-inch to 8-inch diameter SDR 15.5
HDPE. The pipes will be bedded at the base of a clean gravel envelope. The gravel will be compacted
with a small vibratory compactor on both sides of the pipe to compact materials around and over the pipe.
This will produce a very dense envelope around the drainage pipes which corresponds to the desirable
material Class I with compaction condition for the pipe bedding Soil Modulus (E’) value.

The maximum height of overburden on the LCS piping for the current design is approximately 80 feet.
However, an overburden height of 110 feet was used for the design calculations to allow for future
expansion of the South Cell. A value of 110 feet was used for the calculations. The small diameter and
favorable bedding conditions for the standard perforated HDPE pipe will provide a substantial and
sufficient load bearing capacity. A minimum of 16 inches of compacted material must be in place over

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 56
the pipe (24 inches of material over the primary liner) before general equipment traffic will be allowed.
Only specialized low-ground-pressure or other approved equipment will be allowed on areas where the
cover over the pipe or primary liner is less than 16 inches or 24 inches, respectively. With these
restrictions on equipment traffic and live loading during the construction, the critical loading condition
will be the static overburden load at maximum thickness and full cell utilization.

The analyses have incorporated the maximum overburden on the leachate collection pipes, the selected
pipe type for the leachate collection pipes, and a reduced value of the modulus of elasticity of HDPE pipe
to represent long term conditions. The method for determining the acceptability of the pipe installation is
based on methods presented in the “Polyethylene Pipe Handbook” available on-line from Plastic Pipe
Institute (PPI, 2006). The results of the calculations indicate that the 4-inch to 8-inch diameter SDR 15.5
perforated pipe would withstand the maximum static overburden load of 110 feet of tailings at a moist
density of 100 pcf. Additional information regarding piping structural design is provided in Appendix
G.4.

7.8 Liner Anchorage
Liner anchorage for all of the tops of slopes for both the TSF and Process Ponds will be provided by
anchor trenches. The liner system anchorage calculations are provided in Appendix G.5 and present the
most critical slope and loading condition for anchor trench design. The most conservative parameters
were used for the analysis with a slope of 2H:1V with no cover soil over the liner runout. The minimum
trench depth is 24 inches. This is sufficient for anchorage on the perimeter of the TSF and Process Ponds.
Typical details for the anchor trenches for the TSF and Process Ponds is shown on Drawing P1.9.

Liner uplift calculations are included in Appendix G.6. Based on the calculations, the liner system will be
capable of withstanding the design wind without tearing or pulling apart for the current anchor trench
design. The anchor trenches as designed will withstand the tension forces that will be generated by the
wind uplift.

Supplemental restraints for the liner system are recommended for the side slopes and the upstream face of
the South Dam and upstream face of the Divider Berm during construction of the South North Cell to
help maintain the position of the liner system. Based on the calculations in Appendix G.6, it is
recommended that the supplemental support be provided by adding weight on the liner system in the form
of corrugated 32-inch diameter HDPE culverts filled with on-site sand spaced a maximum of 75 feet
between the restraints. Alternative weighting methods and configurations proposed by the lining
construction contractor must be approved by Uranium One. Supplemental supports will not be required
for the Process Ponds during construction (see Appendix G.6).

7.9 Compatibility of HDPE Materials to Leachate
The liners, geonet, and piping will be comprised of HDPE. The general specifications for the HDPE
materials are included in the Technical Specifications included with this submittal. In addition to the
structural and strength related specifications, specifications related to UV and environmental stability, as
well as chemical resistance of the HDPE is included. Many sources of chemical resistance data were
consulted for the purposes of anticipating possible degradation of the liner system. Based on the review of
available data, no measurable chemical degradation of the HDPE materials is expected. The identified
process stream constituents that were evaluated as potentially detrimental to the liner include: sulfuric
acid, sodium chlorate, and kerosene. Other constituents such as flocculants, sodium hydroxide, ammonia,
tridecanol, tertiary amine, or sodium bicarbonate may be added or otherwise introduced to the process
stream and eventually discharged to the tailings, but not at concentrations that are considered significant.
The UV stability is related to carbon black content specifications included in the Technical Specifications.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 57

The acidification of the process stream is considered the primary chemical alteration that has the potential
to affect the liner. The estimated free acid (sulfuric) concentration in the discharge to the tailings is 5
g/liter or approximately 5 percent. All available chemical resistance information indicates that this
concentration is not damaging to HDPE and that acid concentrations can be dramatically greater than 5
percent without damaging the liner. Poly-flex Chemical Resistance Tables (Poly-Flex, 2005) lists non-
oxidizing acids as having little or no effect on an HDPE liner. Table 5.8 in Koerner (2005) lists HDPE as
having “generally good resistance” to inorganic acids at temperatures ranging from 38 to 70 degrees
Celsius. ISCO Industries (2007) lists HDPE as having “satisfactory” chemical resistance to sulfuric acid
for concentrations less than 50 percent at temperatures ranging from 21 to 60 degrees Celsius. Zeus
Industrial Products, Inc. (2007) lists HDPE as chemically resistant to sulfuric acid for concentrations less
than 50 percent at temperatures ranging from 20 to 60 degrees Celsius. Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
(2007) lists HDPE as chemically resistant to sulfuric acid for concentrations less than 50 percent at
temperatures ranging from 20 to 60 degrees Celsius.

There are many sources that document studies supporting the position that the proposed flexible HDPE
geomembrane liner material is compatible with acidic process solutions. Numerous studies that have
been conducted on the effect of various solutions on geomembranes primarily associated with municipal
and industrial landfills. There are limited studies that have been conducted to evaluate the effect of mine
waste leachates on geomembranes. Two of these studies are discussed below.

Mitchell (1985) performed geomembrane chemical compatibility tests with simulated uranium mill
process solution for three types of geomembranes: HDPE, CSPE, and PVC. The simulated solution
consisted primarily of water and sulfuric acid at pH values ranging from 1.5 to 2.5. The HDPE
geomembrane samples used for the testing consisted of a section of 40 mil HDPE geomembrane which
included a fillet-welded field seam. Temperatures used during the testing ranged from 18 to 76 degrees
Celsius. The results of the testing indicated that the acid process solution was “not very aggressive with
any of the materials or seams [tested].” The HDPE geomembrane performed better and was more stable
than the other geomembranes.

Gulec, et al. (2005) performed chemical compatibility tests on three geosynthetic materials including a
geomembrane, geotextile, and drainage geocomposite. Acidic water consisting of sulfuric acid and water
was one of the solutions used in the study. The geomembrane evaluated was a 60 mil HDPE
geomembrane. The results of the study indicate that a 60 mil HDPE geomembrane is resistant to acidic
solutions such as that which will be used at the site.

Current information indicates that HDPE is chemically resistant to acidic uranium mill process solution.
The testing conducted by Mitchell (1985) and Gulec et al. (2005) provides lab data to support the use of
an HDPE liner as part of the TSF liner system. Mitchell’s testing was conducted on a 40 mil HDPE and
Gulec’s testing was conducted on a 60 mil HDPE. In both cases, the results indicated the HDPE
geomembranes were chemical resistant to acidic solutions. A 60 mil HDPE liner has been recommended
for the liner systems at the site.

The same sources listed above for chemical resistance of HDPE to sulfuric acid indicate that sodium
chlorate will not damage HDPE. The expected addition of sodium chlorate to the ore stream is at a rate of
approximately 1.7 lb/ton of ore feed, so concentration of the salt in the discharge stream will be very
small. Available chemical resistance information indicates that pure kerosene will damage HDPE lining,
particularly at very high temperatures (60 deg C or 140 deg F). The anticipated kerosene loss rate from
the Solvent Exchange process is 0.5 gal kerosene per 1000 gallons of process feed, which equates to a
concentration of approximately 500 ppm. Kerosene is volatile and the concentration in any free solution
in the tailings cell will likely be smaller than that in the discharge stream leaving the mill. Ultimately, the

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 58
limited amount of kerosene that remains within the tailings will become relatively immobile because of
adsorption to the tailings solids. It is also possible that the kerosene will undergo a biodegradation
process. Because the maximum plausible kerosene concentration in the discharge to the tailings is very
small and the degree of contact with the liner system is very limited, there is negligible potential for
damage to the liner, geonet, or piping by the presence of small concentrations of kerosene.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 59
8.0 SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE AND EROSION PROTECTION
This section documents the design of surface water management, erosion protection features, and
freeboard determination for the TSF and Process Ponds.

8.1 Design Basis
Conceptual design and preliminary sizing of operational surface water management and erosion
protection facilities was conducted according to NUREG/CR-4620, NUREG 1623, NRC RG 1.59, and
NRC RG 3.11. All operational surface water control features were sized for the 100-year discharge,
computed using conservative assumptions of runoff coefficient and time of concentration, except those
features the overtopping of which would discharge potentially contaminated runoff offsite. Those
features were sized for the Probable Maximum Flood (PMF). Freeboard for the TSF was based on the
Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) series (per Regulatory Guide 3.11), along with 100-year wind and wave
effects.

All potentially contaminated surface water (i.e., runoff from ore pads and restricted areas of the mill site)
is directed to the lined TSF.

8.2 Drainage System Features and Layout
During mill operations, potentially contaminated surface runoff will be routed to a lined TSF, where it
will be impounded and ultimately evaporated. Clean water (from outside the restricted area) will be
diverted around the TSF and Process Ponds via ditches, and discharge offsite. Potentially contaminated
surface water will be impounded only within the tailings storage facility, and will not leave the site.

Major runoff control features include the following, each designed for the 100-year event unless noted
otherwise:

• A rock-lined diversion ditch north of the proposed Process Ponds, diverting offsite runoff
around the ponds. This ditch is sized for the PMF, because overtopping of its banks would
spill clean water into the Process Ponds, potentially leading to overtopping of the Process
Ponds and release of contaminated Process Pond contents. The lining for this ditch is sized
for the 100-year event.
• Collection ditches just inside the mill/ore pad restricted area perimeter fences, diverting
sediment-laden and potentially contaminated mill site runoff to the lined tailings storage
facility. Hydraulic residence time was evaluated for these ditches to ascertain any tendency
to infiltrate potentially contaminated water; the cumulative hydraulic residence time to any
particular discharge point was less than 17 minutes.
• Steep rock-lined ditches conveying mill area runoff water down the sides of the bluff to a
ditch leading to the TSF.
• A rock-lined ditch conveying mill area runoff south along the toe of the east bluff to the TSF.
This ditch is sized for the PMF and lined for the 100-year event where it passes above the
Process Ponds, because overtopping of its banks could result in overtopping of the Process
Pond embankment, and discharge of potentially contaminated runoff and contaminated
Process Pond contents into the unrestricted area north of the TSF.
• Clean water diversions along the TSF perimeter road, collecting lateral inflow from offsite
areas and conveying it away from the TSF. The eastern diversion discharges to the south into
a natural drainage. The western diversion discharges to the sump formed between the cross-
valley berm and divider berm. This area will be pumped out as needed.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 60
• Rock-lined rundowns conveying concentrated runoff from cliff faces across the 1 percent
berm and into the clean water diversion channels. Rundowns were warranted where contour
mapping indicated significant flow concentrations exiting the cliff face could erode the sandy
fill material comprising the berm. Rundowns terminate in rock-lined chutes to convey water
down the steep banks of the clean water diversion channels.
• A clean water diversion atop the eastern bluff, sized for the PMF for the segments which
would discharge towards the TSF if overtopped. This ditch prevents water from atop the
bluff from entering the clean water diversion along the eastern TSF perimeter, minimizing the
size of that diversion, and minimizing the amount of surface runoff entering the TSF for the
freeboard calculation.
• Culverts transmitting ditch flow under service roads and parking/turnaround areas.
• A culvert transmitting mill drainage water into the TSF.

All operational ditches, fords, and culverts were sized for the 100-year peak flow, computed with the
Rational Method, using conservative assumptions of the runoff coefficient (0.9) and Kirpich’s method for
time of concentration, except those noted above as sized for the PMF. 100-year rainfall intensities were
downloaded from NOAA Atlas 14 (NOAA, 2008). PMP rainfall intensities were developed from the 1-
hour, 1-square mile PMP, using the method described in NUREG/CR-4620. Riprap linings, where
applicable, will be as thick as 1.5 times the median diameter of the rock. Equivalent erosion control
blanket may be substituted for riprap when cost-effective. Table 8-1 below summarizes design
dimensions. Design calculations are found in Appendix H.1. Drawing P1.9 presents the Drainage Area
Map, while Figure 8-1 presents a simplified Surface Water Controls Map.

Table 8-1. Drainage Channel Design Summary
Channel Type Slope
Depth
(ft)
Base
Width (ft)
Side
Slope Lining
East and West Clean water diversions (along toe
of bluff) 0.3%* 2.0
(min)
0* (east)
2* (west)2.5:1 2.5" gravel*
Rundown (cliff toe to diversion ditch) 1.0% 1.5 4 2.5:1 2.5" gravel
Rundown chute (down side slope of ditch) 40% 1.5 4 2.5:1 6"-18” riprap
Top of east bluff diversions (Partial PMF
design)
0.3%
0.5%
3.5
1.5
8
2
2.5:1
2:1 2.5" gravel
Offsite diversion (north of Process Pond, PMF
design) 4.5% 3.5 15 2.5:1 24" riprap
On mill site (M1-18 and above) 0.3% -
17.5% 1.5 2 2:1 2.5" gravel**
Steep rock-lined ditch (mill to toe of bluff, M1-
1A and M1-6))
0.5% -
53.1% 2 6 3:1 6" riprap -
18" grouted riprap
Toe of bluff (Below M1-18, Partial PMF
design)
0.5% -
9.0% 1.5-4 6-10 2.5:1 2.5” gravel - 18” grouted
riprap
*Final, steep sections of West diversion are up to 4’ wide and lined with 18” riprap. Outlet of East diversion is 2’ wide, lined
with 2.5” gravel.
**12” riprap at one location

8.3 Phasing of Surface Water Controls
Potentially contaminated water from the mill/ore storage site will be routed to the TSF. Non-impacted
(no potential for contamination) surface water from the bluffs adjacent to the TSF will be routed away
from the TSF. Any non-impacted surface water arriving from areas north of the South Cell will simply
continue present flow patterns, leading to retention, infiltration, or evaporation from portions of the valley
floor north of the proposed divider berm. These areas will be pumped out as needed to prevent long-term

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 61
standing water. Non-impacted surface water from the southern and eastern portions of the mill site lying
outside the restricted area will be routed via roadside ditches and culverts to the canyon lying east of the
bluff on which the mill sits. Drawing P1.9 shows the drainage layout.

Offsite area OS1-1 (OS2-1 in Phase 2 maps) is a natural topographic depression, which overflows first to
the north (away from the TSF) at an elevation between 4498 feet and 4500 feet, and overflows to the
south at an elevation slightly above 4500 feet. For most rainfall events, including the 100-year
operational design event, the depression retains all surface runoff from its contributing area (23.2 acres),
and does not contribute any discharge towards the TSF. For extremely severe events such as the Probable
Maximum Precipitation (PMP), the depression retains some, but not all, of the runoff, and may contribute
discharge towards the TSF, depending on the relative elevations and conveyance capacities of the two
overflow areas. At the present level of design detail, the depression was considered to be non-
contributing for drainage design. For purposes of freeboard determination, it was assumed that this area
would contribute runoff that exceeds its storage volume.

8.4 Maintenance Requirements
Ongoing maintenance of minor flow controls will generally involve spot-fixes of observed minor erosion,
and removal of rockfall and sediment from ditches. Failure of minor drainage controls is possible for
rainfall events exceeding the 100-year recurrence interval. Failure could also occur due to sediment or
rockfall restricting flow capacity of ditches, and would typically result in washout of road base material
without damage to the liner system. In the event of failure, the controls would need to be reconstructed
and road repaired, but contaminated water would remain contained within the TSF.

8.5 TSF and Process Pond Freeboard
TSF and Process Pond freeboard consists of three components: rise due to the design flood, wind setup,
and wave runup. During operations no spillway is provided on the TSF or Process Ponds, and surface
runoff is to be stored within the tailings disposal facility and Process Ponds. The design flood for
freeboard is the 6-hour Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) series, preceded or followed by a 100-year, 6-
hour event. The PMF series is defined as the PMF, preceded by a flood equivalent to about 40 percent of
the PMF, occurring 3 to 5 days prior to the main flood. (U.S. NRC Regulatory Guide 3.11, p 3.11-7,
1977). This is combined with the effects of the 100-year windspeed. The West diversion channel flows
into the sump area OS1-5 formed by the TSF divider berm and the existing cross-valley berm, from
which accumulated water will be pumped out. To ensure stability of the divider berm embankment in the
event of a pumping failure, this area was evaluated for wind and wave effects during storage of the 100-
year, 6-hour event.

The site PMP was determined using the method presented in the National Weather Service (NWS)
Hydrometeorological Report (HMR) 49. Using the HMR 49 method, the 6-hour local storm PMP was
determined to be 9.1 inches for the project site. Using the NOAA Atlas 14 6-hour, 100-year rainfall of
1.79 inches, the PMP series was determined to consist of 14.53 inches (140 percent of 9.1 inches, plus
1.79 inches) of precipitation. Conservatively assuming that all offsite runoff arrives in the TSF (i.e.,
neglecting to subtract non-contributing/depression areas), and using an overall runoff coefficient of 0.90,
the PMP flood volume was determined at each design location. The rise due to the design PMP series
was computed based on the proposed grading geometry.

The 100-year wind/wave effects were determined using the methods in ANSI/ASCE 7-93, and the Corps
of Engineers’ Coastal Engineering Manual. Wind setup (wind tide) was evaluated under conservative
assumptions of operating water depth. Wave erosion protection was evaluated using Corps of Engineers’

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 62
methods. The total freeboard requirements are shown in the Table 8-2. Detailed calculations are located
in Appendix H.2.

Table 8-2. Freeboard Summary
Process Ponds
Freeboard Component TSF OS1-5 South Pond North Pond
Water Surface Elevation (WSE) Rise due to Design Flood (ft):4.38 13.11 1.61 1.67
Wind setup (ft): 0.27 0.04 0.04 0.06
Wave runup (ft): 2.80 0.75 1.22 1.15
Total freeboard (ft): 7.45 n/a 2.87 2.88
Use: rounded up to the next half-foot (ft): 7.50 n/a 3.00 3.00

OS1-5, the area between the TSF and existing cross-valley berm will receive 5.01 acre-feet of runoff
during the 100-year event, which will reach to elevation 4407.90, accounting for wind and wave effects.
A layer of riprap greater or equal than 5” diameter is required on the divider berm embankment below
elevation 4408 to protect against wind and wave action during the 100-year event.

8.6 Mill Site Yield into TSF
Because the restricted area of the mill site will drain into the TSF, it was necessary to estimate the surface
water yield from this area over the life of the project. The surface water yield was used for the water
balance, and to check freeboard. Surface water yield was estimated monthly, based on precipitation data
used for the Tony M Mine (Tetra Tech, 2006) reduced by a runoff coefficient that varied monthly.
Surface water yield was estimated for an 'average' year, assumed to apply for all simulation years.
Because rainfall data was available for entire months, rather than individual storm events, no effective
runoff modeling was possible, and coefficients were established using engineering judgment.
Coefficients were initially established with a target aggregate annual surface water yield between 30 and
45 percent of rainfall, typical for small watersheds in the region. Two sets of runoff coefficients were
used: one set for bare rock, and one for soil/sand-covered areas. Coefficients were assigned their highest
values during summer and early fall, months subject to intense thunderstorms during which most rainfall
can be expected to run off. Coefficients for bare rock / cliffs were 0.10 to 0.15 higher than those for soil
or sand-covered areas, reflecting the lack of infiltration capacity or vegetation of the rocky areas. Under
the updated TSF design concept, the western cliffs no longer drains to the TSF during operations, so the
higher, “cliff,” coefficients were not used, resulting in an overall runoff coefficient of 0.3 (30 percent
annual water yield). Details of the calculations can be found in Appendix H.3.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 63
9.0 REFERENCES
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc., 2007. Technical Note 4.01, Chemical Resistance of Polyethylene and
Elastomers. www.ads-pipe.com

Benson, C.E., 1998. “Test pads and in situ (field) hydraulic conductivity measurements,” in Short Course
Notes, Liners and Covers for Waste Containment Facilities, Craig H. Benson, David E. Daniel
and Charles D. Shackelford instructors, sponsored by GEO Institute, October 26-28, Rosemont,
Illinois.

Benson, C. H., D. E. Daniel, and G. P. Boutwell, 1999. Field performance of compacted clay liners.
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 125(5), 390-403.

Catepillar, 2008. Catepillar Performance Handbook. Page 164. January.

Environmental Resource Group (ERG) and Tetra Tech, Inc., 2008. Environmental Report for Shootaring
Canyon Uranium Processing Facility, Revision 1. October.

Giroud, J.P, B.A. Gross, R. Bonaparte, and J.A. McKelvey, 1997. “Leachate Flow in Leakage Collection
Layers Due to Defects in Geomembrane Liners”, Geosynthetics International, Vol. 4, No. 3-4, pp.
215-292.

Gulec, S.B., C.H. Benson, and T.B. Edil, 2005. “Effect of Acidic Mine Drainage on the Mechanical and
Hydraulic Properties of Three Geosynthetics.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental
Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 8, ASCE, pp. 937-950.

Hydro-Engineering, LLC, 1998. Ground-Water Hydrology of Shootaring Canyon Tailings Site.
Prepared for Plateau Resources Limited.

Hydro-Engineering, LLC, 1999. Aquifer Properties of New Wells and Recommended Sampling Rates.
Prepared for Plateau Resources Limited.

Hydro-Engineering, LLC, 2000. Update of the Ground-Water Hydrology of Shootaring Canyon Tailings
Site. Prepared for Plateau Resources Limited.

Hydro-Engineering, LLC, 2001. Ground-Water Monitoring of Shootaring Canyon Tailings Site, 2000.
Prepared for Plateau Resources Limited.

Hydro-Engineering, LLC, 2002. Ground-Water Monitoring of Shootaring Tailings Site, 2001. Prepared
for Plateau Resources Limited.

Hydro-Engineering, LLC, 2005a. Tailings Management Plan for Shootaring Canyon Uranium Processing
Facility. Amended December 2005. revised April 2007.

Hydro-Engineering, LLC, 2005b. Tailings Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan for Shootaring
Canyon Uranium Project Garfield County, Utah December, 2005, revised December 2006.

Hydro-Engineering, LLC, 2005c. Ground-Water Hydrology of the Shootaring Tailings Site, 2005.
Prepared for Plateau Resources Limited.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 64
ISCO Industries, 2007. Chemical Resistance of High Density Polyethylene Pipe. www.isco-pipe.com.

Keshian, B., and R. Rager, 1988. Geotechnical Properties of Hydraulically Placed Uranium Mill Tailings
in Hydraulic Fill Structures, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 21, ed. D.J.A. Van Zyl and
S.G. Vick. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, New York

Koerner, R.M., 2005. Designing with Geosynthetics. Fifth Edition, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

Lyntek, Inc., 2007. Draft Uranium One Material Balance Calculations. Email communication to Toby
Wright, Uranium One, dated December 5, 2007.

Lyntek, Inc., 2008. Definitive Cost Estimate for the Restart of the Shootaring Canyon Mill, Ticaboo,
Utah. March 28.

Mitchell, D. H., 1985. "Geomembrane Compatibility Tests Using Uranium Acid Leachate", Journal of
Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 2, No. 2, Elsevier Publ. Co., pp.111-128

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 2008. Hydrometeorological Design Studies
Center Precipitation Frequency Data Server. http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds//. Accessed
January 14.

Plastic Pipe Design Manual, available on-line from www.vylonpipe.com, Lamson Vylon Pipe, Cleveland,
Ohio.

Plateau Resources, Ltd. and Hydro-Engineering, LLC, 2007. Tailings Management Plan for Shootaring
Canyon Uranium Processing Facility.

Poly-Flex, Inc., 2005. Reference Manual. March. pp. 39-40.

SRK Consulting, 2007. sxr Uranium One Inc. Due Diligence Review: U.S. Energy Corp. Uranium
Assets- Colorado, Utah and Wyoming, USA. Project No. 166901. January.

Strachan, C, and R. Dorey, 1988. Geotechnical Studies in Introduction to Evaluation, Design, and
Operation of Precious Metal Heap Leaching Projects, ed. D.J.A. Van Zyl, I.P.G. Hutchinson, and
J.E. Kiel. Society of Mining Engineers, Inc., Littleton, Colorado, pp.152-175.

Tetra Tech, Inc., 2006. Tony M. Mine Notice of Intent to Commence Large Mining Operations,
Appendix 2. November 17.

Tetra Tech, Inc., 2007. Shootaring Canyon Mill Annual Ground Water Monitoring Report. March 5.

Tetra Tech, Inc., 2008a. Shootaring Canyon Uranium Mill Tailings Facility Design Report. May 27.

URS, 2007. Utah Division of Radiation Control, Uranium One, Inc., Shootaring Canyon Uranium
Processing Facility, Request to Resume Operations, Interrogatories – Round 2. August 24.

URS, 2008a. Utah Division of Radiation Control, Uranium One, Inc., Shootaring Canyon Uranium
Processing Facility, Request to Resume Operations, Interrogatories – Round 3. February.

URS, 2008b. Utah Division of Radiation Control, Uranium One, Inc., Shootaring Canyon Uranium
Processing Facility, Interrogatories – Round 4. August 28.

Shootaring Canyon Design Report 65

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), 1994. National Engineering Handbook, Part 633,
Chapter 26, Gradation Design of Sand and Gravel Filters.

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), 1989. UMTRA-DOE Technical Approach Document, Revision II,
UMTRA-DOE/AL 050425.0002. December

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 1992. Action Leakage Rates for Leak Detection Systems.
Supplemental Background Document for the Final Double Liners and Leak Detection Systems
Rule for Hazardous Waste Landfills, Waste Piles, and Surface Impoundments. EPA/530-R-92-
004. NTIS Publication PB92-128214. Office of Solid Waste, Washington, D.C. January.

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Arizona Geological Survey, New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral
Resources, and Utah Geologic Survey, 2006. http://earthquakes.usgs.gov/regional/qfaults/,
Quaternary fault and fold database for the United States. Viewed October 2007.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), 1977. Design Basis Floods for Nuclear Power Plants
Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.59. Revision 2, August.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), 1977. Design, Construction, and Inspection of
Embankment Retention Systems for Uranium Mills. Regulatory Guide (RG) 3.11. Revision 2,
December.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), 2002. Design of Erosion Protection for Long-Term
Stabilization. NUREG-1623. September.

Utah Department of Environmental Quality (Utah DEQ), 1999. Ground Water Quality Discharge Permit.
Permit #UGW170003, issued March 19, 1999.

Utah Department of Environmental Quality (Utah DEQ), 2007. Follow-up to Discussions of November
1, 2007, Shootaring Canyon Uranium Tailings Impoundment: BAT Engineering Design Options.
Letter to Uranium One from Loren B. Morton, Section Manager, Division of Radiation Control.
November 9.

Woodward-Clyde Consultants, 1978a. Environmental Report, Shootaring Canyon Uranium Project,
Garfield County. Prepared for Plateau Resources Limited. Revised June 16, 1980

Woodward-Clyde Consultants, 1978b. Supplemental S1 Environmental Report, Shootaring Canyon
Uranium Project, Garfield County, Utah. Prepared for Plateau Resources Limited. June.

Woodward-Clyde Consultants, 1978c. Supplemental S2 Environmental Report, Shootaring Canyon
Uranium Project, Garfield County, Utah. Prepared for Plateau Resources Limited. September.

Woodward-Clyde Consultants, 1978d. Tailings Management Plan and Geotechnical Engineering Studies,
Shootering Canyon Uranium Project, Garfield County, Utah. September.

Woodward-Clyde Consultants, 1979. Stage 1 – Tailings Impoundment and Dam Final Design Report,
Shootering Canyon Uranium Project, Garfield County Utah, May.

Zeus Industrial Products, Inc., 2007. Chemical Resistance of HDPE. www.zeusinc.com.

December 2008
P://181692/Design Report/Figures/Figures 2_16 2_17 & 2_18.ppt
Project No: 181692
Figure 2-18
Potential Clay Borrow Source within Utah State Lease Area
Elev. 5080’
Dipping of Brushy Basin Shale Beds
Dakota/Cedar Mountain Sandstone
December 2008
P://181692/Design Report/Figures/Figures 2_16 2_17 & 2_18.ppt
Project No: 181692
Figure 2-19
“Popcorn” Texture of Brushy Basin Clay Soils
December 2008
P://181692/Design Report/Figures/Figures 2_16 2_17 & 2_18.ppt
Project No: 181692
Figure 2-20
Sand Seam in Brushy Basin Member
Sand Seam
December 2008
P:\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Figure 7-3.ppt
Project No: 181692
Figure 7-3
Example Acceptable Zone (AZ) Compaction Specification Based on the Line of
Optimums
Dr
y

U
n
i
t

W
e
i
g
h
t
,

γd
Moisture Content, w
Line of
OptimumsModified Proctor
Standard Proctor
Reduced Proctor
Closed Symbols: k ≤10-7 cm/s
Open Symbols: k >10-7 cm/s
Zero Air Voids
Preliminary
AZ
Final
AZ
Dr
y

U
n
i
t

W
e
i
g
h
t
,

γd
Moisture Content, w
Line of
OptimumsModified Proctor
Standard Proctor
Reduced Proctor
Closed Symbols: k ≤10-7 cm/s
Open Symbols: k >10-7 cm/s
Zero Air Voids
Preliminary
AZ
Final
AZ
December 2008
P:
\
1
8
1
6
9
2

S
h
o
o
t
a
r
i
n
g

C
a
n
y
o
n
\
D
e
s
i
g
n

R
e
p
o
r
t
\
R
e
v
i
s
e
d

R
e
p
o
r
t

S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r

2
0
0
8
\
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
\
F
i
g
u
r
e

7
-
4
.
p
p
t
Project No. 114-181692
Figure 7-4
Acceptable Zone for Compaction of
Clay/Sand Mixture for Clay Liner
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
5 1015202530
50/50 Blends
60/40 Blends
Dr
y

U
n
i
t

W
e
i
g
h
t

(
p
c
f
)
Water Content (%)
Line of Optimums
Solid symbols indicate permeability specimens
Modified effort curves
Standard effort curves
Reduced effort curves
Acceptable Zone
Gs = 2.7
Zero Air Voids Curve:

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A
GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATION

Appendix A 1
APPENDIX A
Geophysical Investigation

Tetra Tech conducted a geophysical survey in Utah at the Shootaring Canyon Uranium Mill site to assist
in mapping the potential rippability of sandstone at the site. This work was completed to assist in the
construction of a Tailings Storage Facility (TSF) at the site.

The geophysical survey using seismic refraction was conducted on March 4, 2008. The seismic refraction
method was used to collect seismic data at 3 locations at the site. The refraction survey was successful in
providing data to assist in the mapping the potential rippability of the sandstone bedrock. This report
provides a brief summary and description of the site background, the seismic methodology, field
investigation activities, and interpretation of results from the geophysical surveys.

SITE DESCRIPTION

The site is located in an area characterized by buttes, mesas and canyons approximately five miles
southwest of Mt. Ellsworth of the Henry Mountains. The mill is situated on a low mesa and a small,
isolated catchment to the west contains the TSF. A tall butte separates the site from Shitamaring Canyon.
Drainage from the site is to the southwest into Shitamaring Creek. The tributary in which the tailings
dam is located has been called Shootaring Canyon. Local relief ranges from 200 to 500 feet. Geologic
structure is relatively simple in the immediate area, with the various sedimentary formations dipping
gently (2 to 3 degrees) to the west.

Sedimentary rocks exposed at the surface are predominantly sandstones of Upper Jurassic age. The high
buttes and mesas west and north of the site are capped by the Salt Wash Member of the Morrison
Formation. This fluvial sandstone unit contains the uranium deposits that are mined in the area. Exposed
cliffs surrounding the buttes and mesas are comprised primarily of thinly bedded reddish-brown siltstones
and mudstones of the Summerville Formation, underlain by the generally massive fine grained reddish-
brown Entrada Sandstone. The Entrada Sandstone is the bedrock underlying the mill and the TSF.
Review of the boring log Tt-4 (see Appendix C.3) indicates that sandstone is present to the base of the
boring (60 feet). The boring log indicates that the sandstone is medium to fine grained and thinly bedded
at the site.

APPROACH AND GEOPHYSICAL METHODS

A brief description of the seismic refraction methodology and theory is included. Seismic methods
require the generation of a sound wave into the subsurface of the earth and instrumentation to measure
and record the refracted waves. This is accomplished by the use of a seismic source (hammer and plate,
shotgun, explosive, etc.), seismograph, and a length of cable with multiple geophones. The seismograph
measures the travel times of elastic waves generated by the source through the subsurface. Geophones
sense the seismic vibrations, convert them to electrical impulses and send them to the seismograph to be
recorded.

The refraction method measures the compressional wave (p-wave) velocity to image the subsurface.
Refraction wave paths cross boundaries between materials in a way that energy travels from source to
receiver in the shortest possible time. Source to receiver travel time of and the corresponding geometry of
the geophone spread are then used to calculate velocities and depths. The seismic velocities are
characteristic of the type and density of the unconsolidated material and or rock represented.

The seismic refraction data is interpreted using software for selecting first arrival times and calculating
the seismic velocities for each unit and the depth to rock. This process provides high-resolution seismic

Appendix A 2
refraction interpretations by providing depth information under each geophone to various geologic layers.
Tomographic processing algorithms can also be used with multiple shot data and provide a higher
resolution interpretation of spatial changes in subsurface velocities. Seismic data are typically presented
in two-dimensional (2-D) cross section showing changes in velocity at depth.

Certain site-specific conditions if present can limit the resolution of the seismic refraction interpretation,
which may include cultural noise (automobiles, machinery, etc.) and/or the presence of thin and/or slower
velocity zones at depth, which can create erroneous depths in the interpretation of the data.

The Caterpillar Company has compiled charts that relate seismic velocities in various geologic materials
to the ability of specific size and power bulldozers to excavate these materials by ripping. The Caterpillar
rippability chart for a D9 Caterpillar bulldozer was presented in Section 2 as Figure 2-13. This chart
indicates that sandstones with seismic p-wave velocities less then approximately 8,000 feet per second
(ft/s) are considered to be rippable. The chart also indicates that sandstones with p-wave velocities of
approximately between 8,000 ft/s to 9,500 ft/sec are marginally rippable and velocities over 9,500 ft/sec
are non rippable.

FIELD INVESTIGATION ACTIVITIES

The seismic data was collected utilizing a Seistronix RAS 24 (24-channel) seismograph, 4.5 Hz
geophones and a 12-pound hammer as a seismic source. Each line consisted of 24 geophones each spaced
ten feet apart for a total length of 240 feet each. Shots were performed at nine locations along each
seismic line and include: two off-end locations (10 and 50 feet from each end geophone); geophones 1
and 24; and between geophone pairs 6 and 7, 12 and 13, and 18 and 19. Data from each shot were
recorded at 0.5 millisecond intervals for one second and stored on a laptop computer connected to the
RAS-24 seismograph. The autostacking feature of the seismograph was used to stack multiple hammer
blows at each location in order to increase the signal to noise ratio of the data.

Seismic data from three lines located as shown on Figure 2-14 (Section 2) was collected for this
investigation. The location of the survey lines were surveyed with a hand held GPS unit (Garmin
GPSMAP 76) after completion of the site geophysical investigation.

DATA INTERPRETATION

The data were analyzed using Geometrics’ SeisImager and Rimrock Geophysics SIP software. P-wave
data was determined by using SIP to pick the first arrival times which where input into both the SIP and
SeisImager’s tomographic modeling algorithms to interpret comparative 2-D cross sections of P-wave
velocities. The interpreted seismic cross sections are attached to this letter report. Typically tomographic
data provides interpretation of changes in spacial velocity and the SIP method provides both interpretation
of distinct changes at depth and identification of specific layers at depth.

The interpreted seismic cross sections from SeisImager’s tomographic modeling are presented in
Attachment A and indicate that the seismic velocities range from 1,000 feet per second (ft/s) to
approximately 7,500 ft/s. The slower velocities are representative of near surface unconsolidated material
with higher velocities representing weathered rock to more competent rock at depth. These values fall
within the typical velocity ranges for weathered material and the sandstone rocks found at the site. The
higher velocity numbers (approximately 7,000 ft/s) were present near the ends and the bottom depths of
each interpreted cross section and location where the SeisImager results are less accurate and likely over
estimate the actual subsurface velocities.

Appendix A 3
The interpretation from the SIP program indicates the presence of two distinct velocity layers at the site.
The first layer is relatively shallow with average p-wave velocities ranging from 1,300 ft/s to 2,200 ft/s
with a bottom depth of 2 to 10 feet below ground surface (bgs). The underlying velocity zone ranges
from approximately 3,900 ft/s to 5,300 ft/s. Interpretations of the seismic data indicate that the interpreted
depth of investigation to the bottom of each cross section ranges from approximately 50 to 75 bgs.

Based on the interpretations of the seismic data and comparison to the rippability chart in Figure 2-13 it
appears that the majority of sandstone present at each of the seismic lines to a depth of 75 feet bgs is
rippable with the potential for some material at the greater depths potentially categorized as marginally
rippable. None of the data from seismic lines 1, 2, and 3 indicate that non rippable materials with p-wave
velocities greater then 9,500 ft/s are present to depth of 75 feet bgs.

SUMMARY

The seismic refraction survey was successful in providing data to assist in interpreting rippability of the
bedrock subsurface underneath the site where seismic data was collected. Based on the interpretation of
the seismic refraction data, the Entrada Sandstone appears to be rippable to depth of approximately 75
feet bgs.

Seismic Refraction, like any remote sensing technique, requires the interpretation of indirect methods of
measurement. As such, there is an inherent margin of error, which is unavoidable. Our methods of data
acquisition and interpretation are as complete as is reasonably possible, and we believe them to be a
reasonable representation of the subsurface conditions. However, due to the subjective nature of any type
of interpretation, we cannot guarantee that our results are accurate in all areas. The findings identified by
this survey should be compared closely to selective in-situ methods such as the geotechnical borings
collected at the site before designs are based on these findings.

ATTACHMENT A
SEISMIC LINES 1, 2, AND 3 – P-WAVE VELOCITY CROSS SECTIONS

Sh
o
o
t
a
r
i
n
g

S
e
i
s
m
i
c

L
i
n
e

#

1
Sh
o
o
t
a
r
i
n
g

S
e
i
s
m
i
c

L
i
n
e

#

2
Sh
o
o
t
a
r
i
n
g

S
e
i
s
m
i
c

L
i
n
e

#

3

APPENDIX B
SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS FOR SHOOTARING CANYON
URANIUM PROCESSING FACILITY

Seismic Hazard Analysis for Shootaring
Canyon Uranium Processing Facility

Prepared for:

Uranium One

3801 Automation Way, Suite 100
Fort Collins, Colorado 80525
[phone]
Fax [phone]

Prepared by:

Tetra Tech

3801 Automation Way, Suite 100
Fort Collins, Colorado 80525
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Tetra Tech Project No. 181692

November 12, 2007
Revised April 8, 2008
Revised September 15, 2008

Seismic Hazard Analysis (181692) Uranium One
Tetra Tech September 15, 2008 i
TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................1
1.1 Project Location ..........................................................................................................1
1.2 Previous Work.............................................................................................................1
1.2.1 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories...............................................................1
1.2.2 USGS.........................................................................................................................2
2.0 REGIONAL PHYSIOGRAPHIC AND TECTONIC SETTING.................................................3
3.0 SEISMICITY............................................................................................................................4
3.1 Earthquake Catalogs...................................................................................................4
4.0 SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS..............................................................................................5
4.1 Seismic Sources .........................................................................................................5
4.1.1 Active Faults...............................................................................................................5
4.1.2 Background Event......................................................................................................7
4.2 Attenuation Relations..................................................................................................9
4.3 Peak Ground Acceleration ..........................................................................................9
4.4 Amplification..............................................................................................................11
5.0 RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS.........................................................................................12
REFERENCES ...........................................................................................................................13

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1 Minimum Criteria for Considering Faults (NRC 10 CFR Part 100, Appendix A)............6
Table 2 Completeness Periods and Event Counts Used in Recurrence Calculations................8
Table 3 PGA for Significant Faults, Deterministic Analysis.......................................................10
Table 4 Hazard Contribution to Total Mean Hazard for 10,000-year Return Period,
Probabilistic Analysis ..................................................................................................11

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1 Historical Earthquakes and Quat. Faults Within 200 Miles of Shootaring Canyon Site
Figure 2 Faults Discussed in Seismic Hazard Analysis
Figure 3 Temporal Distribution of Earthquakes Within 200 Miles of Shootaring Canyon Site
Figure 4 Recurrence Curve for Earthquakes Within 200 Miles of Shootaring Canyon Site
Figure 5 Total Seismic Hazard Curve, Shootaring Canyon Site
Figure 6 Source Contribution to Total Seismic Hazard, Shootaring Canyon Site

Seismic Hazard Analysis (181692) Uranium One
Tetra Tech September 15, 2008 ii

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

Attachment A Deaggregation of Seismic Hazard for PGA from USGS National Seismic
Hazards Mapping Project
Attachment B Earthquake Events near Shootaring Canyon Site
Attachment B.1 Earthquake Events with Magnitude Greater or Equal to 4.0 Occurring
Within 200 Miles of Shootaring Canyon Site
Attachment B.2 Earthquake Events Within 80 Miles of Shootaring Canyon Site
Attachment C Quaternary Faults and Folds Within 200 Miles of Shootaring Canyon Site
Attachment C.1 Deterministic Characteristics
Attachment C.2 Probabilistic Characteristics
Attachment D Description of Faults Within Project Area, From USGS, et al. 2006.
Attachment E EZ-FRISK Software Input

Seismic Hazard Analysis (181692) Uranium One
Tetra Tech September 15, 2008 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Shootaring Canyon Uranium Processing Facility is currently in Standby status. Uranium
One, Inc. is proposing to convert the present license to Operational status. This seismic hazard
analysis has been prepared to characterize the peak horizontal ground acceleration (PGA) for
use in seismic stability analyses of the facility.

1.1 Project Location
The site is located in a sparsely populated area of Garfield County, southeastern Utah,
approximately 50 miles south of Hanksville, Utah (see Figure 1). A small town, Ticaboo, is
located 2.6 miles south of the site. For the purposes of these analyses, the central location of
the facility has coordinates of 37.72°N latitude and 110.70°W longitude.

1.2 Previous Work
Seismicity of the Shootaring site has been discussed in several previous consultants’ reports.
The Tailings Management Plan (Plateau Resources, Ltd et al., 2007) included results of several
tailings stability and deformation analysis in Attachment A of the referenced report. Attachment
A.1 includes results from a January 9, 1997 pseudostatic analysis of the Shootaring Canyon
Dam. The analysis was performed using a horizontal seismic coefficient of 0.19 g based on a
published report by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories (Bernreuter et al., 1995).
Attachment A.5 includes a June 14, 1999 deformation analysis on the Shootaring Canyon Dam.
The analyses were performed using a PGA of 0.33 g based on a U.S. Geological Survey
(USGS) Peak Acceleration Map. Specific references for the map were not provided in the
Tailings Management Plan (Plateau Resources Ltd, et al., 2007), but as will be discussed in
Section 1.2.2, it is assumed that the PGA corresponds to a 1 percent probability of exceedance
in 50 years.

1.2.1 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories (Bernreuter et al., 1995) performed a seismic hazard
analysis for the Shootaring Canyon site as part of a study of all Title II sites performed for the
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The purpose of the study was to evaluate the
seismic design assumptions for mining sites where uranium tailings are being stored by
performing simplified deterministic and probabilistic analyses. Results of this study concluded
that the PGA using deterministic methods is 0.3 g (median plus one sigma) and using
probabilistic methods is 0.19 g for an annual probability of exceedance (PE) of 1x10-4.

The deterministic analysis concentrated on three faults of the Bright Angel fault system. The
three faults evaluated include the fault closest to the site, and then two larger, but more distant,
faults of the system. This analysis concluded that the closest fault (4 km long, located 9 km
from the site) has the greatest potential impact on the site. Attenuation equations used in the
analysis were not specified.

The probabilistic analysis considered the pattern of random earthquakes occurring in an
undefined source zone around the site. Earthquake catalogs from the past 30 years
(presumably from 1965 to 1995) were used to estimate a recurrence model for the area. The
three faults of the Bright Angel fault system were not incorporated into their probabilistic
analysis.

Seismic Hazard Analysis (181692) Uranium One
Tetra Tech September 15, 2008 2
1.2.2 USGS
The source of the Peak Acceleration Map presented in the Tailings Management Plan,
Attachment A.4 (Plateau Resources, Ltd. et al., 2007) was not referenced in Attachment A.4. A
reproduction of this map is presented for convenience in Attachment A of this report. The map
appears to be similar to interactive maps available from the USGS National Seismic Hazard
Mapping Project (NSHMP) website using 1996 NSHMP data (USGS, 2007a), also shown in
Attachment A. However, the PGA contours shown in Attachment A.4 are higher than the PGAs
shown on the website for either a 2 percent or 10 percent probability of exceedance in 50 years.
Although a PGA contour map showing 1 percent probability of exceedance is not currently
available on the USGS website, it is assumed that at some point, this interactive map was
available and it is this map that was presented in Attachment A.4. This assumption is supported
by data obtained from the USGS National Seismic Hazard Mapping Project (NSHMP) website
for 1996 Interactive Deaggregations (USGS, 2007a). Using the site location coordinates and a
return period of 4975 years (which corresponds to a 1 percent probability of exceedance in 50
years), the mapping project reports an acceleration of 0.34 g. Therefore, it is assumed that the
value of 0.33 g is an interpolated value from a map provided by NSHMP corresponding to a 1
percent chance of exceedance in 50 years, using 1996 data.

In 2002, the NSHMP was updated. Using 2002 data (USGS, 2007b), the PGA at the site for a
return period of 4975 years is reported as 0.32 g. The hazard is almost entirely (99.2 percent)
attributed to background seismicity within the Colorado Plateau around the site. It should be
noted that for purposes of assigning attenuation models for the NSHMP, the USGS drew a
boundary between the central and eastern United States (CEUS) and western United States
(WUS). The Shootaring Canyon site is located just within this CEUS boundary area. For areas
within this CEUS boundary, attenuation relations of Toro et al. (1997), Frankel et al. (1996),
Atkinson and Boore (1995), and Campbell (2002) were used. The output for this data is
included in Attachment A.

Seismic Hazard Analysis (181692) Uranium One
Tetra Tech September 15, 2008 3
2.0 REGIONAL PHYSIOGRAPHIC AND TECTONIC SETTING
The Shootaring Canyon site is located within the Colorado Plateau physiographic province in
southeastern Utah. The Colorado Plateau is a broad, roughly circular region of relative
structural stability within a more structurally active region of disturbed mountain systems. Broad
basins and uplifts, monoclines, and belts of anticlines and synclines are characteristic of the
plateau (Kelley, 1979). Igneous intrusions have formed several mountains, such as the Henry
Mountains near the facility. However, most of the topographic relief in the Colorado Plateau is
the result of erosion of deep canyons rather than upstanding mountain ranges (Thornbury,
1965).

The site is located near the southern end of the Henry Mountains’ structural basin. The basin
contains sedimentary rocks ranging from Mesozoic to Cenozoic in age, which are cut by the
Tertiary intrusives forming the Henry Mountains, including Mt. Ellsworth. Fault development in
the area is associated with the intrusive igneous centers of the Henry Mountains. These faults
commonly have a northeasterly or northwesterly strike and do not generally extend far from the
intrusive bodies. Faults are not known to exist within the project.

The interior of the Colorado Plateau is characterized by low heat-flow (Bodell and Chapman,
1982) and a thick (45 km) crust (Keller, Braile, and Morgan, 1979), as compared to the
surrounding Basin and Range Province and Rio Grande rift. The transition zone between the
interior and the surrounding provinces may be as wide as 100 to 150 km (Zoback and Zoback,
1989). This data suggest a weakening of the sides of the plateau lithosphere. Such weakening
is consistent with the normal faulting along the margins of the plateau. The source of the
relative stability of the Colorado Plateau thus is probably related to the cooler interior that has
been stronger than the surrounding regions (Morgan and Swanberg, 1985).

The contemporary seismicity of the Colorado Plateau was investigated by Wong and Humphrey
(1989) based on seismic monitoring. Their study characterized the seismicity of the plateau as
being of small to moderate magnitude, of a low to moderate rate of occurrence with earthquakes
widely distributed. Seismicity in the plateau appears to be the result of the reactivation of pre-
existing faults not expressed at the surface but favorably oriented to the tectonic stress field.
Very few earthquakes can be associated with known geologic structures or tectonic features in
the plateau. The generally small size of the earthquakes and their widespread distribution is
consistent with a highly faulted Precambrian basement and upper crust, and a moderate level of
differential tectonic stresses. Earthquakes in the plateau generally occur within the upper 15 to
20 km of the upper crust (Smith, 1978, Wong and Chapman, 1986) although events have
occurred as deep as 58 km (Wong and Humphrey, 1989). The predominant mode of tectonic
deformation within the plateau appears to be normal faulting on northwest- to north-northwest-
striking faults, with some localized occurrences of strike-slip displacement on northwest- or
northeast-striking planes at shallow depths. The contemporary state of stress within the plateau
is characterized by approximately northeast-trending extension (Wong and Humphrey, 1989).
Seismic Hazard Analysis (181692) Uranium One
Tetra Tech September 15, 2008 4
3.0 SEISMICITY
3.1 Earthquake Catalogs
This seismic hazard analysis for the site included a review of historic earthquakes which have
occurred within 200 miles of the site. Catalogs from the USGS NSHMP for the Western United
States (WUS) and Central and Eastern United States (CEUS) (Mueller et al., 1997) were used.
These catalogs, compiled by the USGS for their study, included removal of duplicate events as
well as aftershocks and foreshocks related to the primary earthquake events in order to obtain a
catalog of independent events. The database includes historical seismic events over the period
from 1787 through December 2001. The WUS and CEUS catalogs were supplemented with
events occurring between January 2002 and September 2007 by searching the National
Earthquake Information Center (NEIC) database, also maintained by the USGS. This
supplemental search resulted in three additional earthquakes. The catalog searches were
limited to events with moment magnitude (Mw) greater than or equal to 4.0. A total of 114
events are included in the record. Earthquake activity is relatively diffuse and generally of small
magnitudes, as shown in Figure 1. The earthquakes are tabulated in Attachment B.1.

The largest event is estimated in the WUS catalog to have an Mw of 6.5. This event occurred
near Richfield, Utah on November 14, 1901. The epicenter is approximately 105 miles
northwest of the site, within the Intermountain seismic belt (ISB), a seismically active zone
between the western border of the Colorado Plateau, and the Basin and Range physiographic
province.

The event closest to the site had an epicenter about 20 miles southeast of the site. This
earthquake, which occurred on August 22, 1986, had an Mw of 4.0. As discussed in Wong and
Humphrey (1989), this event is the largest earthquake known to have occurred in southeastern
Utah. The focal mechanism for the earthquake exhibited normal faulting on northwest-striking
fault planes.

In addition to the evaluation of significant earthquakes (Mw>4) as described above, a search of
low magnitude events (Mw>2.4) within 80 miles of the site was also conducted using the NEIC
database. These events are shown in Figure 2 and are tabulated in Attachment B.2.

Seismic Hazard Analysis (181692) Uranium One
Tetra Tech September 15, 2008 5
4.0 SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS
Seismic hazard analyses are typically conducted using one of two methods: (1) deterministic
analysis or (2) probabilistic analysis. In the deterministic analyses, the ground motions from the
maximum credible earthquake (MCE) associated with capable faults are attenuated to the site.
A capable fault is defined by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), in
Appendix A to Part 100—Seismic and geologic siting criteria for Nuclear Power Plants, as a
fault that has exhibited one or more of the following characteristics: 1) movement at or near the
ground surface at least once within the past 35,000 years, or movement of a recurring nature
within the past 500,000 years; 2) macroseismicity (magnitude 3.5 or greater) determined with
instruments of sufficient precision to demonstrate a direct relationship with the fault; or 3) a
structural relationship to a capable fault such that movement on one fault could be reasonably
expected to cause movement on the other. The ground motions from the MCE associated with
the fault are attenuated to the site using established attenuation equations. In deterministic
analyses, typically median plus one sigma ground motions are reported.

Background, or floating, earthquakes are typically evaluated deterministically by placing the
largest earthquake that can be assumed to occur unassociated with a known fault at a distance
of 15 km from the site. In areas of low seismic activity, deterministic analyses tend to
significantly overestimate ground accelerations.

In probabilistic analyses, ground motions and the associated probability of exceedance are
estimated in order for the amount of risk associated with the design ground motion to be
evaluated. As specified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Promulgated
Standards for Remedial Actions at Inactive Uranium Processing Sites (40 CFR 192), the
controls of residual radioactive material are to be effective for up to 1,000 years, to the extent
reasonably achievable and, in any case, for at least 200 years. For the purpose of the seismic
hazard evaluation, a 10,000-year return period is adopted for evaluating long-term stability of
the facility. The probability that the 10,000-year event will be exceeded within a 200- to 1,000-
year design life is between 2 and 10 percent. This is consistent with the International Building
Code (IBC, 2006) which specifies designing for ground motions associated with a 2 percent
probability of exceedance in a 50-year design life, or a return period of approximately 2,500
years. Similarly, a 2,500-year return period is appropriate during operational conditions,
considering a design life of 50 years.

Seismic hazard analysis was performed using software EZ-FRISK, version 7.25 (Risk
Engineering, Inc, 2008).

4.1 Seismic Sources

4.1.1 Active Faults

Quaternary faults were identified using the USGS Quaternary Fault and Fold database (USGS
et al. 2006). Faults within 200 miles of the site are shown in Figure 1. A tabulated list of the
faults is included in Attachment C.1. NRC documentation in 10 CFR Appendix A to Part 40 and
10 CFR Appendix A to Part 100 gives specific criteria for faults that should be considered as
follows:
Seismic Hazard Analysis (181692) Uranium One
Tetra Tech September 15, 2008 6
Table 1 Minimum Criteria for Considering Faults (NRC 10 CFR Part 100, Appendix A)
Distance from site
(miles)
Minimum length of fault to be
considered (miles)
0 to 20 1
20 to 50 5
50 to 100 10
100 to 150 20
150 to 200 40

All faults from the Quaternary Fault and Fold database that met these minimum requirements
were considered as seismic sources for the deterministic seismic hazard analysis. This is a
conservative approach, as the definition of a Quaternary fault is movement within the past 1.8
million years, and the definition of an active fault, as described in Section 4.0, is between 35,000
and 500,000 years. The MCE associated with each fault was calculated based on correlations
between fault length and magnitude, as developed by Wells and Coppersmith (1994).

For the probabilistic analysis, faults that are included in the USGS Quaternary fault and fold
database and have the potential to produce PGAs of 0.05 g or greater (based on deterministic
methods) were selected for further evaluation in the probabilistic model. These criteria resulted
in the inclusion of the following seven faults:

1) Bright Angel fault system, Fault 1, (2514),
2) Bright Angel fault system, Fault 2, (2514);
3) Bright Angel fault system, Fault 3, (2514);
4) Needles fault zone, (2507);
5) Shay graben, (2513);
6) Aquarius and Awapa plateau faults, (2505); and
7) Thousand Lakes fault (2506).

These faults are shown in Figure 2. These faults were not considered in the USGS NSHMP
because their activity in the Quaternary is suspect, or because their movement in the mid to late
Quaternary did not meet the USGS definition of an active fault.

The three faults of the Bright Angel fault system are included in the hazard analysis due to their
proximity to the site and potential impacts. This fault system is classified as Class B in the
Quaternary fault and fold database (USGS et al, 2006). The definition of Class B faults is
geologic evidence that demonstrates the existence of Quaternary deformation, but either (1) the
fault might not extend deeply enough to be a potential source of significant earthquakes, or (2)
the currently available geologic evidence is too strong to confidently assign the feature to Class
C but not strong enough to assign it to Class A. The fault system is described as an expansive
area of poorly understood suspected Quaternary faults in the Colorado Plateau. The faults are
entirely within bedrock, thus Quaternary deformation can not be proven. Focal mechanism
studies by both Brumbaugh (2005) and Wong and Humphrey (1989) indicate that within the
Colorado Plateau, northwest striking normal faults are compatible with the modern state of
stress of northeast-trending extension of the plateau, and northeast trending faults tend to not
be active. Based on this data, the northeast trending faults of the Bright Angel fault system
(labeled Fault 1 and 3 on Figure 2) will be assigned a low probability of seismogenic activity
(0.10). Although Quaternary deformation has not been proven (USGS et al., 2006) and USGS
did not consider this fault system to be active in the NSHMP, the northwest-trending Fault 2 will
Seismic Hazard Analysis (181692) Uranium One
Tetra Tech September 15, 2008 7
be assigned a higher probability of seismogenic activity of 0.50 because it is oriented favorably
to the stress field.

The Needles fault zone has been removed from the probabilistic analysis because it is a
structure resulting from salt movement that does not extend deeper than the evaporites of the
Paradox Formation and is not considered seismogenic (Wong et al. 1996, Huntoon, 1982).

The Shay Graben faults have been assigned a lower probability of seismogenic activity (0.10)
due to evidence for late-Quaternary deformation being associated with salt-dissolution collapse
(Wong et al. 1996, Oviatt, 1988).

Descriptions of the faults (USGS et al. 2006) are included in Attachment D. Additional
uncertainties in the fault characteristics are incorporated into the probabilistic analysis by
representing the possible scenarios with a weight value. In general, the mean value is given a
weight of 0.6, with the mean plus or minus one standard deviation values each given a weight of
0.2. The parameters used in the probabilistic analysis are described below, and are
summarized in Attachment C.2.

Fault dips were assumed to vary between 40 and 80 degrees, with a mean value of 60 degrees.
This is consistent with the NSHMP, which assumes a dip of 60 degrees for most normal faults
within the western U.S., and with previous seismic hazard analyses in the Colorado Plateau
(Wong et al., 1996). Fault depths were assumed to vary between 12 and 20 km, with a mean
value of 15 km, as is typical in western U.S. (Wong and Chapman, 1990). Maximum
magnitudes for the faults were estimated based upon the empirical relationship developed by
Wells and Coppersmith (1994) for surface rupture length, with an uncertainty of 0.3
corresponding to the standard error in the Wells and Coppersmith (1994) relationship. The
recurrence relationships for the faults were modeled using both Gutenberg-Richter exponential
and maximum magnitude recurrence models. The exponential model was given a weight of 0.2
and the maximum magnitude model was given a weight of 0.8 in the analysis. Slip rates are
used to characterize rates of fault activity. However, very limited data was available regarding
slip rates, and the USGS fault and fold database categorizes all the 7 considered faults as
simply having a slip-rate less than 0.2 mm per year. Slip rates were therefore modeled as being
between 0.005 and 0.2 mm per year, similar to rates of activity assigned to many faults of
questionable quaternary activity in the Rio Grande Rift area east of the Colorado Plateau (Wong
et al., 2004).

4.1.2 Background Event
Many earthquakes occur that are not associated with a known structure. These events are
termed background events, or floating earthquakes. Evaluation of the background event allows
for potential low to moderate earthquakes not associated with tectonic structures to contribute to
the seismic hazard of the site. The maximum magnitude for these background events within the
Intermountain U.S. ranges between local magnitude (ML) 6.0 and 6.5 (Woodward-Clyde 1996).
Larger earthquakes would be expected to leave a detectable surface expression, especially in
arid to semiarid climates, with slow erosion rates and limited vegetation. In seismically less
active areas such as the Colorado Plateau, the maximum magnitude associated with a
background event is assumed to be 6.3, consistent with that used in seismic evaluations
performed for uranium tailing sites in Green River (DOE 1991a, pg. 26), and Grand Junction
(DOE 1991b, pg. 71).

Seismic Hazard Analysis (181692) Uranium One
Tetra Tech September 15, 2008 8
The hazard from background earthquakes is assessed using two approaches, each given equal
weight in the probabilistic analysis. The first approach uses areal source zones and assumes a
uniformly distributed seismicity within the zone. The second approach uses gridded seismicity
which retains a degree of stationarity using 0.1 degree latitude and longitude grid spacing, as
used by USGS for the NSHMP (Frankel et al. 1996).

The earthquake magnitude and recurrence interval of an areal source zone were assessed by
looking at the earthquake record within 200 miles of the site, filtered to include only events with
Mw values equal or greater than 4.0, as described in Section 3.1. The entire 200-mile radius
circle about the site was evaluated as a source zone with uniformly distributed seismicity. As
shown in Figure 1, the NW quadrant of the 200-mile radius circle has a high concentration of
Quaternary faults and historical earthquake events. This zone corresponds to the Intermountain
Seismic Belt (ISB), an area of significant earthquake activity. Including these events is
conservative, as the recurrence interval of events in the remaining portion of the circle, including
around the site, is overestimated.

In computation of background seismicity recurrence, all events know to be associated with faults
considered in the hazard analysis should be removed from the analysis. On November 14,
1901, an earthquake with an estimated Mw of 6.5 occurred in Sevier County at an approximate
location of 38.7° latitude and -112.1° longitude. As shown in Figure 2, this location is close to
several Quaternary faults (Joseph Flats area faults and syncline - 2468, Elsinore fault - 2470,
Dry Wash fault and syncline - 2496, Annabella graben - 2472, and Sevier fault northern portion -
2355). The earthquake record shows a total of 9 earthquakes with Mw equal or greater than 4.0
in this immediate area. The Mw 6.5 event has been removed from the background analysis
since it is likely related to one of these structures, and an event of this magnitude will likely have
a surface expression. For conservatism, the other eight events of lesser magnitude have been
retained in the analysis.

The earthquake recurrence of the source zone was described by the truncated-exponential form
of the Gutenberg-Richter relationship of log N = a – bM using the maximum likelihood procedure
by Weichert (1980). The completeness periods for various magnitudes were estimated by
Mueller et al. (1997). Table 2 gives the completeness period dates and the number of
earthquakes during each period. Figure 3 shows the temporal distribution of earthquakes within
the study area, and Figure 4 shows the recurrence curve.

Table 2 Completeness Periods and Event Counts Used in Recurrence Calculations
Magnitude
Range (Mw)
Completeness
Period
Number of
Earthquakes
4.0-4.9 1/1963 - 8/2007 56
5.0-5.9 1/1930 - 8/2007 22
6.0-7.0 1/1850 - 8/2007 1

A study by Wong et al. (1996) also evaluated the recurrence of background events within the
Colorado Plateau. The areal source zone is the interior portion of the plateau, as shown in
Figure 1. The recurrence relationship developed for that study is shown on Figure 4. The
relationship developed by Wong et al. (1996) is a robust analysis which limits the source zone to
that most seismically similar to the project site. However, the seismicity record goes only
Seismic Hazard Analysis (181692) Uranium One
Tetra Tech September 15, 2008 9
through 1994. Therefore, the recurrence relationship for the 200-mile radius about the site is
retained in the analysis because it incorporates events through 2007. The two recurrence
relationships are evaluated in the hazard analysis with equal weight.

4.2 Attenuation Relations
Attenuation of ground motions from the location of a seismic event to the site was calculated
using attenuation relations. Due to the absence of abundant strong ground motion records, no
specific attenuation relation exists solely for Utah; thus, several attenuation relations from other
areas were considered for use at the site. For the purposes of this study, the following three
attenuation relationships were used: Spudich et al. (1999), Abrahamson and Silva (1997), and
Campbell and Bozorgnia (2007). The empirical attenuation relations are appropriate for soft
rock sites in the western U.S. An important consideration in the selection of appropriate
attenuation relationships is that the area is located in an extensional tectonic regime where fault
type is predominately normal. Spudich et al. (1999) was developed from an extensional
earthquake database. Abrahamson and Silva (1997) and Campbell and Bozorgnia (2007)
include normal faulting factors in the relations. The hazard was truncated at three standard
deviations about the median value of each of the three attenuation relationships. Results from
each relationship, along with the lognormal mean of the three relations are reported in Table 3.

4.3 Peak Ground Acceleration
Based on deterministic methods, the median plus one sigma ground motion from the
background event results in a PGA of 0.24 g. Seven faults are identified as potentially capable
of producing site PGA of 0.05 g or greater, and are summarized in Table 3.

Seismic Hazard Analysis (181692) Uranium One
Tetra Tech September 15, 2008 10
Table 3 PGA for Significant Faults, Deterministic Analysis
PGA
Median (Median plus 1 sigma)

Source Name

ID No.
Distance
from Site
(km)

MCE Spudich
et al.
(1999)
Abrahamson
and Silva
(1997)
Campbell
and
Bozorgnia
(2007)
Lognormal
mean
Background Event --- 15 6.3 0.12 (0.19) 0.20 (0.33) 0.13 (0.23) 0.15 (0.24)
Bright Angel, Fault 1 2514 9 5.8 0.14 (0.22) 0.20 (0.35) 0.16 (0.28) 0.16 (0.28)
Bright Angel, Fault 2 2514 13 6.2 0.13 (0.21) 0.21 (0.36) 0.14 (0.25) 0.16 (0.27)
Bright Angel, Fault 3 2514 35 6.7 0.07 (0.11) 0.10 (0.16) 0.07 (0.12) 0.08 (0.13)
Needles Fault 2507 60 6.8 0.04 (0.06) 0.06 (0.09) 0.04 (0.07) 0.05 (0.07)
Thousand Lake Fault 2506 90 7.0 0.03 (0.05) 0.04 (0.07) 0.03 (0.06) 0.03 (0.06)
Shay graben Fault 2513 88 6.9 0.03 (0.05) 0.04 (0.07) 0.03 (0.06) 0.03 (0.06)
Aquarius and Awapa
Fault 2505 89 6.9 0.03 (0.05) 0.04 (0.06) 0.03 (0.05) 0.03 (0.05)
Seismic Hazard Analysis (181692) Uranium One
Tetra Tech September 15, 2008 11
As compared to the background event, only the faults of the Bright Angel Fault Zone result in
PGA values of comparable magnitude. However, the likelihood of any of these events occurring
within the design life of the project can only be evaluated by looking at the probabilistic analysis.

Table 4 shows the seismic source contribution to the total mean hazard at a return period of
10,000 years (or 1x10-4 annual percent exceedance). The mean PGA is estimated to be 0.18 g.
The total hazard curve is shown in Figure 5 and the source contribution is shown in Figure 6. As
shown in Figure 6, at this frequency, the hazard is almost entirely contributed to the background
event. Input to the EZ-FRISK analysis is included in Attachment E.

Table 4 Hazard Contribution to Total Mean Hazard for 10,000-year Return Period,
Probabilistic Analysis

Source Name

ID No.
Distance
from Site
(km)
PGA
Background Event –
Ext Gridded --- --- 0.07
Background Event –
CO Plateau Int (Wong
et al. 1996)
--- --- 0.11
Background Event –
200-mile radius about
site
--- --- 0.13
Bright Angel, Fault 1 2514 9 <0.01
Bright Angel, Fault 2 2514 13 <0.01
Bright Angel, Fault 3 2514 35 <0.01
Needles Fault 2507 60 <0.01
Thousand Lake Fault 2506 90 <0.01
Shay graben Fault 2513 88 <0.01
Aquarius and Awapa
Fault 2505 89 <0.01
Total Hazard --- --- 0.18

4.4 Amplification
Geologic maps of the area (Hackman and Wyant, 1973) indicate that the site is underlain by
Lower Cretaceous Morrison and Upper Jurassic Summerville formation of sandstones,
mudstones, and siltstones. As defined in Campbell and Bozorgnia (2003), the site is
categorized as a firm rock site, based on underlying geologic unit consisting of pre-Tertiary
sedimentary rock. As such, further amplification of ground motions due to underlying soils was
not considered. If further investigations indicate that the materials within the upper 30 meters
are not classified as firm rock, soil amplification should be considered.

Seismic Hazard Analysis (181692) Uranium One
Tetra Tech September 15, 2008 12
5.0 RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
Based on the probabilistic analysis, a PGA (at an annual PE of 1x10-4) of 0.18 g should be used
for long-term seismic stability analyses. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE, 1989)
recommends that a seismic coefficient of two-thirds of the PGA be used to analyze long-term,
pseudostatic stability analyses. Therefore, for long-term pseudostatic analyses, a seismic
coefficient of 0.12 g is recommended.

The value of 0.18 g is lower than the 0.32 g from the USGS 2002 Interactive Deaggragations
(USGS, 2007a). It is likely that the majority of the difference is a result of using different
attenuation relationships. As discussed in Section 1.2.2, the site is very close to the border
drawn by USGS between the WUS and CEUS zones. Because the site lies within the CEUS
area, the USGS applied attenuation relations developed for the CEUS. However, using
attenuation relations that are specific to normal extensional faulting is appropriate for this area
as supported by Wong and others (e.g. Wong et al. 1996, Halling 2002, Wong et al. 2004).

During operational conditions, designing for an annual PE of 4x10-4, or a 2500-year return
period would correlate roughly to a 2 percent chance of exceedance in 50 years. Using this
criterion, the PGA is 0.10 g and the seismic coefficient is 0.07 g.

Seismic Hazard Analysis (181692) Uranium One
Tetra Tech September 15, 2008 13
REFERENCES
Abrahamson, N.A., Silva, W.J. (1997) Empirical Response Spectral Attenuation Relations for
Shallow Crustal Earthquakes. Seismological Research Letters 68(1): 94-127.

Atkinson, G.M. and D. M. Boore (1995) Ground motion relations for eastern North America.
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 85: 17-30.

Bernreuter, D., McDermott, E., Wagoner, J. (1995) Seismic Hazard Analysis of Title II
Reclamation Plans. Prepared for U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Lawrence
Livermore National Laboratory, UCRL-ID-121733.

Bodell, J.M., and Chapman, D.S. (1982) Heat Flow in the North-Central Colorado Plateau.
Journal of Geophysical Research 87: 2869-2884.

Brumbaugh, D.S. (2005) Active faulting and seismicity in a prefractured terrane: Grand Canyon,
Arizona. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 95: 1561-1566.

Campbell, K.W. (2002) Prediction of strong ground motion using the hybrid empirical
method: example application to eastern North America, submitted to Bulletin of the
Seismological Society of America.

Campbell, K.W., and Bozorgnia, Y. (2003) Updated near-Source Ground-Motion (Attenuation)
Relations for the Horizontal and Vertical Components of Peak Ground Acceleration and
Acceleration Response Spectra. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 93(1):
314-331.

Campbell, K.W. and Bozorgnia, Y. (2007) NGA Ground motion relations for the geometric mean
horizontal component of peak and spectra ground motion parameters. Pacific
Earthquake Engineering Research Center Report 2007/02, 246 p.

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy) (1989) Technical Approach Document: Revision II, Uranium
Mill Tailings Remedial Action Project. Washington D.C.

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy) (1991a) Remedial Action Plan and Final Design for
Stabilization of the Inactive Uranium Mill Tailings at Green River, Utah.

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy) (1991b) Remedial Action Plan and Site Design for
Stabilization of the Inactive Uranium Mill Tailings Site at Grand Junction, Colorado.

Frankel, A. (1995) Mapping seismic hazard in the Central and Eastern United States,
Seismological Research Letters 66(4): 8-21.

Frankel, A., Mueller, C., Barnard, T., Perkins, D., Leyendecker, E., Dickman, N., Hanson, S.,
and Hopper, M, (1996) National seismic hazard maps – Documentation June 1996.
USGS, Open-file Report 96-532.

Hackman, R.J., and Wyant, D.G. (1973) Geology, Structure, and Uranium Deposits of the
Escalante Quadrangle, Utah and Arizona USGS scale 1:250,000.

Seismic Hazard Analysis (181692) Uranium One
Tetra Tech September 15, 2008 14
Halling, M.W., J.R. Keaton, L.R. Anderson, and W. Kohler, 2002. Deterministic Maximum Peak
Bedrock Acceleration Maps for Utah, Utah Geological Survey Miscellaneous Publication
02-11, July.

Huntoon, P.W. (1982) The Meander anticline, Canyonlands, Utah, an unloading structure
resulting from horizontal gliding on salt. Geologic Society of America Bulletin 93: 941-
950.

International Building Code (2006) International Code Council, Inc.

Keller, G.R., Braile, L.W., and Morgan, P. (1979) Crustal Structure, Geophysical Models and
Contemporary Tectonism of the Colorado Plateau. Tectonophysics 61:131-147.

Kelley, V.C. (1979) Tectonics of the Colorado Plateau and New Interpretation of Its Eastern
Boundary. Tectonophysics 61: 97–102.

Morgan P. and Swanberg, C.A. (1985) On the Cenozoic Uplift and Tectonic Stability of the
Colorado Plateau. Journal of Geodynamic 3: 39-63.

Mueller, C., Hopper, M, and Frankel, A. (1997). Open-File Report 97-464 Preparation of
Earthquake Catalogs for the National Seismic-Hazard Maps: Contiguous 48 States,
USGS.

Oviatt, C.G. (1988) Evidence for Quaternary deformation in the Salt Valley anticline,
southeastern Utah. Utah Geological Survey Bulletin 122: 61-76.

Plateau Resources, Ltd and Hydro-Engineering, LLC (2007) Tailings Management Plan,
Amended December, 2005, Revised April, 2007 for Shootaring Canyon Uranium
Processing Facility. Prepared for Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of
Radiation Control. Report Dated April, 2007.

Risk Engineering, Inc. (2008). EZ-FRISK, version 7.25. Boulder, CO.

Smith, R. B. (1978) Seismicity, Crustal Structure and Interplate Tectonics of the Interior of the
Western Cordillera, in Smith, R.B., and Eaton, G.P., eds., Cenozoic tectonics and
regional geophysics of the western Cordillera: Geological Society of America Memoir
152: 111-144.

Spudich, W.B., Joyner, W.B., Lindh, A.G., Boore, D.M., Margaris, B.M., and Fletcher, J.B.
(1999) SEA99: A Revised Ground Motion Prediction Relation for use in Extensional
Tectonic Regimes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 89(5): 1156-1170.

Thornbury, M. (1965) Regional Geomorphology of the United States, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.,
New York.

Toro, G., Abrahamson, N., and Schneider, J. (1997). Model of strong ground motions from
earthquakes in the central and eastern North America: best estimates and
uncertainties. Seismological Research Letters 68: 41-57.

Seismic Hazard Analysis (181692) Uranium One
Tetra Tech September 15, 2008 15
USGS (2007a). http://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/hazmaps/interactive/index.php, Interactive
Deaggregation, 1996, Viewed October 2007.

USGS (2007b). http://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/hazmaps/interactive/index.php, Interactive
Deaggregation, 2002, Viewed October 2007.

USGS, Arizona Geological Survey, New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, and
Utah Geological Survey (2006). http//earthquakes.usgs.gov/regional/qfaults/,
Quaternary fault and fold database for the United States, Viewed October 2007.

Weichert, D. (1980) Estimation of the earthquake recurrence parameters for unequal
observation periods for different magnitudes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of
America 70: 1337-1346.

Wells, D.L., and Coppersmith, K.J. (1994). New Empirical Relationships among Magnitude,
Rupture Length, Rupture Width, Rupture Area, and Surface Displacement, Bulletin of the
Seismological Society of America, 84(4), pp. 974–1002, August.

Woodward-Clyde Consultants (1996) Evaluation and Potential Seismic and Salt Dissolution
Hazards at the Atlas Uranium Mill Tailings Site, Moab, Utah, Oakland, California,
unpublished Consultant’s report for Smith Environmental Technologies and Atlas
Corporation, SK9407.

Wong, I. G., and Chapman, D.S. (1986) Deep intraplate earthquakes in the intermountain U.S.:
Implications to thermal and stress conditions in the lower crust and upper mantle,
Earthquake Notes 57: 6.

Wong I.G., and Chapman, D.S. (1990) Deep intraplate earthquakes in the western U.S. and
their relationship to lithospheric temperatures. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of
America 80: 589-599.

Wong, I.G., and Humphrey, J.R. (1989) Contemporary seismicity, faulting, and the state of
stress in the Colorado Plateau, Geological Society of America Bulletin 101: 1127-1146.

Wong, I.G., Olig, S.S., and Bott, J.D.J. (1996) Earthquake potential and seismic hazards in the
Paradox Basin, southeastern Utah, in A.C. Huffman, W.R. Lund, and L.H. Godwin, eds.,
Geology and Resources of the Paradox Basin, 1996 Special Symposium, Utah
Geological Association and Four Corners Geological Society Guidebook 25: 241-250.

Wong, I., Olig, S., Dober, M., Silva, W., Wright, D., Thomas, P., Gregor, N., Sanford, A., Lin, K.,
and Love, D (2004) Earthquake Scenario and Probabilistic ground-shaking hazard maps
for the Albuquerque-Belen-Santa Fe, New Mexico, corridor. New Mexico Geology 26(1):
pp. 3-33.

Zoback, M. L., and Zoback, M. D. (1989) Tectonic stress field of the continental United States,
in Pakiser, L.C., and Mooney, W.D., eds., Geophysical Framework of the Continental
United States: Geological Society of America Memoir 172: 523-540.

Site Location
Ticaboo
Ogden
Flagstaff
Hanksville
Saint George
Taylorsville
Grand Junction
Salt Lake City
Lake Havasu City
107°0'0"W
107°0'0"W
108°0'0"W
108°0'0"W
109°0'0"W
109°0'0"W
110°0'0"W
110°0'0"W
111°0'0"W
111°0'0"W
112°0'0"W
112°0'0"W
113°0'0"W
113°0'0"W
114°0'0"W
114°0'0"W
41°0'0"N 41°0'0"N
40°0'0"N 40°0'0"N
39°0'0"N 39°0'0"N
38°0'0"N 38°0'0"N
37°0'0"N 37°0'0"N
36°0'0"N 36°0'0"N
35°0'0"N 35°0'0"N
34°0'0"N 34°0'0"N
MAR 11, 2008FIGURE 1
HISTORICAL EARTHQUAKES AND QUATERNARY FAULTS WITHIN 200 MILES OF SHOOTARING CANYON SITE
MAR 11, 2008 N:\arcprj2\181501\mxd\Base.mxd BY:megan.wood
0 80
Miles
SHOOTARING 181501
Earthquakes (Moment Magnitude)
4-4.9
5-5.9
6-6.9
Quaternary Faults and Folds
Colorado Plateau
Colorado Plateau Interior Seismic Zone
Site Location
2 5 1 3
2507
2514
2506
2 5 0 5
2
3
5
5
2470
24722468
2496
3
21
109°0'0"W
109°0'0"W
110°0'0"W
110°0'0"W
111°0'0"W
111°0'0"W
112°0'0"W
112°0'0"W
39°0'0"N 39°0'0"N
38°0'0"N 38°0'0"N
37°0'0"N 37°0'0"N
36°0'0"N 36°0'0"N
MAR 10, 2008FIGURE 2
FAULTS DISCUSSED IN SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS
MAR 10, 2008 N:\arcprj2\181501\mxd\Faults.mxd BY:megan.wood
0 40
Miles
SHOOTARING 181501
Earthquakes (Moment Magnitude)
2.4-2.9
3-3.9
4-4.9
5-5.9
6-6.9
Quaternary Faults and Folds
80 Mile Buffer
April 2008Project No: 181692
FIGURE 3
TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION OF EARTHQUAKES WITHIN
200 MILES OF SHOOTARING CANYON SITE
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Year
Cu
m
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

C
o
u
n
t
M>6
5>M>6
4>M>5
22 events in 77 years =
0.286 events/yr
56 events in 44 years =
1.273 events/yr
1 event in 157 years =
0.006 events/yr
Total activity for Mw>4.0 = 1.565 events/year
Total activity normalized per square km = 4.865E-6
April 2008Project No: 181692
FIGURE 4
RECURRENCE CURVES FOR EARTHQUAKES
SHOOTARING CANYON SITE
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7
Magnitude (Mw)
Nu
m
b
e
r

o
f

E
v
e
n
t
s

p
e
r

Y
e
a
r

p
e
r

s
q

k
m

E
x
c
e
e
d
i
n
g

M
w
Log N = a - bM
b = 0.85
a = 3.58
study area = 321,700 km2
a (normalized per square km) = -1.93
Β = b ln(10) = 1.96
Maximum Magnitude Mw = 6.3
From Wong et al. 1996
b = 0.92
a (normalized per square km) = -2.15
Maximum Magnitude Mw = 6±0.5
April 2008Project No: 181692
FIGURE 5
TOTAL SEISMIC HAZARD CURVE
SHOOTARING CANYON SITE
1.00E-05
1.00E-04
1.00E-03
1.00E-02
1.00E-01
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
Peak Ground Acceleration (g)
An
n
u
a
l

F
r
e
q
u
e
n
c
y

o
f

E
x
c
e
e
d
e
n
c
e
Mean
Abra-Silva (1997)
Spudich (1999)
Camp-Boz (2007)
April 2008Project No: 181692
FIGURE 6
SOURCE CONTRIBUTION TO TOTAL SEISMIC HAZARD
SHOOTARING CANYON SITE
1.00E-06
1.00E-05
1.00E-04
1.00E-03
1.00E-02
1.00E-01
1.00E+00
0.01 0.1 1 10
Peak Ground Acceleration (g)
An
n
u
a
l

F
r
e
q
u
e
n
c
y

o
f

E
x
c
e
e
d
a
n
c
e
Bright Angel 1
Bright Angel 2
Bright Angel 3
Shay graben
200-mile radius
Thousand Lakes
Aquarius and Aw apa
Total Hazard
CO Plateau Interior
WUS Ext Gridded

ATTACHMENT A
DEAGGREGATION OF SEISMIC HAZARD FOR PGA
FROM USGS NATIONAL SEISMIC HAZARDS
MAPPING PROJECT

ATTACHMENT B
EARTHQUAKE EVENTS NEAR SHOOTARING
CANYON SITE

ATTACHMENT B.1
EARTHQUAKE EVENTS WITH MAGNITUDE GREATER
OR EQUAL TO 4.0 OCCURRING WITHIN 200 MILES OF
SHOOTARING CANYON SITE
Appendix B.1: Earthquake events with Magnitude greater or equal to 4.0 occurring
within 200 miles of Shootaring Canyon site
Source:
Open-File Report 97-464 "Preparation of Earthquake Catalogs for the National Seismic-Hazard Maps:
Contiguous 48 States" by Charles Mueller, Margaret Hopper, and Arthur Frankel.
Western US Moment Magnitude Catalog
WUS > 4 Mw
BOLD data is more recent than January 1996
Magnitude
(Mw)
Longitude
(degree,
west)
Latitude
(degree,
north)
Depth
(km) Year Month Day Hour Minute Second Catalog
5.7 -112.522 37.047 0 1887 12 5 15 30 0 DNAG
5.7 -112.114 39.952 0 1900 8 1 7 45 0 DNAG
6.5 -112.083 38.769 0 1901 11 14 4 39 0 DNAG
4.3 -112.639 38.279 0 1902 7 31 7 0 0 DNAG
6.3 -113.52 37.393 0 1902 11 17 19 50 0 DNAG
5 -113.007 38.393 0 1908 4 15 0 0 0 DNAG
5 -112.149 38.682 0 1910 1 10 13 0 0 DNAG
5.7 -111.5 36.5 0 1912 8 18 21 12 0 DNAG
4.3 -113.713 37.572 0 1914 12 14 5 30 0 DNAG
5 -111.655 40.239 0 1915 7 15 22 0 0 DNAG
4.3 -111.781 39.972 0 1916 2 5 6 25 0 DNAG
4.3 -113.573 37.106 0 1920 11 26 0 0 0 DNAG
5.2 -112.1 38.7 0 1921 9 29 14 12 0 USHIS
4.3 -113.233 38.166 0 1923 5 14 12 10 0 DNAG
5 -112.827 37.842 0 1933 1 20 13 10 0 DNAG
5 -112.1 36 0 1935 1 10 8 10 0 DNAG
4.3 -113.5 36.3 0 1936 1 22 3 38 0 SRA
4.3 -112.958 37.25 0 1936 5 9 10 25 0 DNAG
4.7 -113.3 38 0 1936 9 21 6 20 0 USHIS
4.3 -112.433 37.822 0 1937 2 18 4 15 0 DNAG
4 -114 37 0 1938 12 28 4 37 36 DNAG
4 -114.3 37.3 0 1941 5 6 3 11 42 CDMG
4.3 -111.65 39.58 0 1942 6 4 22 4 0 DNAG
5 -113.065 37.682 0 1942 8 30 22 8 0 DNAG
4 -114.1 37.4 0 1943 3 6 20 14 30 SRA
4.3 -112.26 38.58 0 1943 11 3 9 30 0 DNAG
4 -114.25 37.35 0 1943 11 6 3 55 0 CDMG
5 -111.986 38.765 0 1945 11 18 1 15 0 DNAG
4.3 -111.637 39.263 0 1948 11 4 13 18 0 DNAG
4.7 -113.1 37.5 0 1949 11 2 2 29 29 CDMG
4.3 -111.729 40.038 0 1950 5 8 22 35 0 DNAG
5 -111.9 38.5 0 1950 11 18 1 15 0 DNAG
4.3 -111.655 40.239 0 1951 8 12 0 26 0 DNAG
4.3 -111.86 40.396 0 1952 9 28 20 0 0 DNAG
4.3 -111.5 40.5 0 1953 5 24 2 54 29 DNAG
4.3 -112.433 37.822 0 1953 10 22 3 0 0 DNAG
Shootaring Earthquakes.xls 1 of 5
Appendix B.1: Earthquake events with Magnitude greater or equal to 4.0 occurring
within 200 miles of Shootaring Canyon site
5 -107.3 38 0 1955 8 3 6 39 42 DNAG
5 -111.44 40.341 0 1958 2 13 22 52 0 DNAG
4.3 -111.833 39.711 0 1958 11 28 13 30 39 DNAG
5 -112.5 38 0 1959 2 27 22 19 52 DNAG
5.6 -112.37 36.8 0 1959 7 21 17 39 29 USHIS
5 -111.5 35.5 0 1959 10 13 8 15 0 USHIS
5 -111.66 39.34 0 1961 4 16 5 2 39.3 DNAG
4.3 -114.333 37.667 0 1961 9 26 21 46 20 CDMG
4.7 -107.6 38.2 25 1962 2 5 14 45 51.1 USHIS
4.4 -112.9 37 21 1962 2 15 9 6 45.1 SRA
4.5 -112.4 36.9 26 1962 2 15 7 12 42.9 USHIS
4.5 -112.1 38 33 1962 6 5 22 29 45 USHIS
4.4 -114.2 37.5 0 1962 7 8 15 58 6 CDMG
4.3 -111 40 33 1962 9 7 8 47 19 DNAG
5 -111.91 39.53 7 1963 7 7 19 20 39.6 USHIS
4 -111.19 40.03 7 1963 7 9 20 25 25.8 SRA
4 -111.55 39.1 7 1966 4 23 20 20 53.3 SRA
4.2 -111.85 37.98 7 1966 5 20 13 40 47.9 SRA
5.4 -114.2 37.4 33 1966 9 22 18 57 36.5 USHIS
4.4 -111.6 35.8 34 1966 10 3 16 3 50.9 SRA
4.2 -113.16 38.2 7 1966 10 21 7 13 48.9 SRA
4.2 -112.3 38.8 33 1967 6 22 21 51 29.9 DNAG
4.2 -111.6 36.15 33 1967 9 4 23 27 46.2 SRA
5.6 -112.16 38.54 7 1967 10 4 10 20 12.8 USHIS
4 -112.04 39.27 7 1968 1 16 9 42 52.1 SRA
4 -113.082 38.407 0 1970 3 30 15 15 52.7 DNAG
4.1 -111.72 37.87 7 1970 4 18 10 42 11.5 SRA
4.2 -112.47 38.06 7 1970 5 23 22 55 23.2 SRA
4.1 -113.1 37.8 7 1971 11 10 14 10 23 SRA
4.5 -112.17 38.65 7 1972 1 3 10 20 38.9 USHIS
4.3 -112.07 38.67 7 1972 6 2 3 15 48.2 SRA
4.5 -111.35 40.51 7 1972 10 1 19 42 29.5 USHIS
4.6 -111.97 39.94 5 1980 5 24 10 3 36.3 SRA
4.3 -111.74 40.32 1 1981 2 20 9 13 1.2 USHIS
4.4 -113.3 37.59 1 1981 4 5 5 40 39.7 USHIS
4.3 -111.62 35.17 0 1981 12 6 9 9 20.3 DNAG
4.3 -112.04 38.71 5 1982 5 24 12 13 26.6 USHIS
4 -112.565 38.577 0 1983 12 9 8 58 40.7 SRA
4.6 -112.009 39.236 1 1986 3 24 22 40 23.4 USHIS
5.3 -111.614 38.824 10 1989 1 30 4 6 22.7 USHIS
4 -112.257 35.952 5 1989 3 5 0 40 30.8 PDE
4 -112.355 35.96 5 1992 3 14 5 13 31.6 PDE
4.4 -111.554 38.783 0 1992 6 24 7 31 20.2 PDE
4 -112.219 35.982 5 1992 7 5 18 17 29.9 PDE
5.7 -113.472 37.09 15 1992 9 2 10 26 20.9 PDE
5.3 -112.112 35.611 10 1993 4 29 8 21 0.8 PDE
4.1 -112.327 38.078 5 1994 9 6 3 48 37.6 PDE
Shootaring Earthquakes.xls 2 of 5
Appendix B.1: Earthquake events with Magnitude greater or equal to 4.0 occurring
within 200 miles of Shootaring Canyon site
4 -112.223 35.964 5 1995 4 17 8 23 46.2 PDE
4 -113.294 37.416 5 1995 6 8 8 29 16.5 PDE
4.5 -112.467 38.206 5 1998 1 2 7 28 29 PDE
4.1 -112.49 37.97 2 1998 6 18 11 0 40 PDE
4.2 -112.727 38.077 5 1999 10 22 17 51 15.6 PDE
4 -111.53 38.75 2 1999 12 22 8 3 31 PDE
4.1 -112.56 38.73 0 2001 2 23 21 43 50 PDE
4.4 -111.521 38.731 3 2001 7 19 20 15 34 PDE
Shootaring Earthquakes.xls 3 of 5
Appendix B.1: Earthquake events with Magnitude greater or equal to 4.0 occurring
within 200 miles of Shootaring Canyon site
Source:
Open-File Report 97-464 "Preparation of Earthquake Catalogs for the National Seismic-Hazard Maps:
Contiguous 48 States" by Charles Mueller, Margaret Hopper, and Arthur Frankel.
Central/Eastern US Bodywave Magnitude Catalog
CEUS > 4 mb
BOLD data is more recent than January 1996
Magnitude
(mb)
Longitude
(degree,
west)
Latitude
(degree,
north)
Depth
(km) Year Month Day Hour Minute Second Catalog
5 -107.5 39 0 1944 9 9 4 12 20 DNAG
5 -109.5 35.7 0 1950 1 17 0 51 0 DNAG
5.3 -110.5 40.5 0 1950 1 18 1 55 51 USHIS
4.3 -110.163 38.997 0 1953 7 30 5 45 0 DNAG
5.5 -107.6 38.3 49 1960 10 11 8 5 30.5 USHIS
4.3 -111.22 38.1 7 1963 9 30 9 17 39.3 SRA
4.2 -107.6 38.3 33 1966 9 4 9 52 34.5 SRA
4.4 -107.51 38.98 33 1967 1 12 3 52 6.2 SRA
4.1 -107.86 37.67 33 1967 1 16 9 22 45.9 SRA
4 -108.31 37.92 33 1970 2 3 5 59 35.6 SRA
4 -108.68 38.91 5 1971 11 12 9 30 44.6 SRA
4.1 -108.65 39.27 5 1975 1 30 14 48 40.3 SRA
4.6 -108.212 35.817 0 1976 1 5 6 23 33.9 SNMX
4.2 -108.222 35.748 0 1977 3 5 3 0 55.8 SNMX
4.8 -110.47 40.47 6 1977 9 30 10 19 20.4 USHIS
4 -110.574 37.42 5 1986 8 22 13 26 33.3 SRA
5.4 -110.869 39.128 10 1988 8 14 20 3 3.9 USHIS
4.5 -107.976 38.151 10 1994 9 13 6 1 23 PDE
4.1 -108.925 40.179 5 1995 3 20 12 46 16.3 PDE
4.2 -110.878 39.12 0 1996 1 6 12 55 58.6 PDE
Shootaring Earthquakes.xls 4 of 5
Appendix B.1: Earthquake events with Magnitude greater or equal to 4.0 occurring
within 200 miles of Shootaring Canyon site
Source: NEIC Earthquake search
FILE CREATED: Mon Sep 17 20:44:04 2007
Circle Search Earthquakes= 649
Circle Center Point Latitude: 37.720N Longitude: 110.700W
Radius: 320.000 km
Catalog Used: PDE
Data Selection: Historical & Preliminary Data
BOLD data is more recent than January 1996
Magnitude
(Mw)
Longitude
(degree,
west)
Latitude
(degree,
north)
Depth
(km) Year Month Day Hour Minute Second Catalog
4.6 -111.857 39.516 0 2003 4 17 1 4 19 PDE
4.1 -108.915 38.236 0 2004 11 7 6 54 59 PDE
4.1 -113.305 38.071 7 2007 8 18 13 16 31 PDE-Q
Shootaring Earthquakes.xls 5 of 5

ATTACHMENT B.2
EARTHQUAKE EVENTS WITHIN 80 MILES OF
SHOOTARING CANYON SITE
Appendix B.2 Earthquake events within 80 miles of Shootaring Canyon Site
Source: NEIC Earthquake Search Results
U N I T E D S T A T E S G E O L O G I C A L S U R V E Y
E A R T H Q U A K E D A T A B A S E
FILE CREATED: Wed Mar 5 16:19:19 2008
Circle Search Earthquakes= 19
Circle Center Point Latitude: 37.720N Longitude: 110.700W
Radius: 129.000 km
Catalog Used: PDE
Data Selection: Historical & Preliminary Data
Catalog Used: USHIS
Data Selection: Significant U.S. Earthquakes (USHIS)
Catalog Used: SRA
Data Selection: Eastern, Central and Mountain States of U.S. (SRA)
CATALOG
SOURCE
Date COORDINATES DEPTH
Magnitude
(Mw)
YEAR MO DA LAT LONG km
SRA 1885 12 17 38.3 -111.5 3.0
SRA 1896 10 14 38.4 -110.7 3.0
SRA 1935 10 6 37.9 -111.4 3.7
SRA 1943 8 14 38.2 -111.4 3.7
SRA 1955 3 27 38.3 -111.3 3.7
SRA 1962 3 16 36.88 -109.72 2.4
USHIS 1962 6 5 38 -112.1 33 4.5
SRA 1962 8 19 38.05 -112.09 7 3.2
SRA 1963 9 30 38.1 -111.22 7 4.3
SRA 1966 5 20 37.98 -111.85 7 4.1
SRA 1967 2 1 37.83 -110.17 7 2.5
SRA 1967 5 8 37.79 -110.17 7 2.7
SRA 1968 2 23 37.6 -110.24 7 2.8
SRA 1968 9 24 38.04 -112.08 7 3.6
SRA 1969 8 19 37.64 -110.65 7 2.6
SRA 1970 4 18 37.87 -111.72 7 3.7
SRA 1972 7 13 37.56 -111.94 7 2.9
SRA 1976 11 19 38.66 -111.35 7 2.5
SRA 1976 12 28 38.35 -111.17 7 2.5
SRA 1977 8 12 36.79 -110.92 7 2.6
SRA 1977 9 21 37.11 -111.54 7 2.7
SRA 1977 11 29 36.82 -110.99 7 3.0
SRA 1979 4 30 37.88 -111.02 7 3.8
SRA 1979 10 23 37.89 -110.93 7 3.5
SRA 1981 4 9 37.72 -110.54 2 2.7
SRA 1981 5 29 36.83 -110.37 1 3.0
SRA 1981 9 10 37.5 -110.56 2 3.1
SRA 1982 4 17 38.22 -111.3 9 3.0
SRA 1982 8 25 38.01 -111.64 7 2.7
SRA 1983 1 27 37.778 -110.674 7 3.3
PDE 1983 5 3 38.288 -110.592 7 3.0
PDE 1983 8 4 37.556 -110.409 7 2.7
SRA 1983 12 15 37.575 -110.51 3 2.8
PDE 1986 5 14 37.429 -110.561 5 3.2
PDE 1986 8 22 37.42 -110.574 5 4.0
SRA 1986 11 7 37.43 -110.297 1 3.0
PDE 1988 8 8 37.894 -111.23 15 2.8
PDE 1991 1 26 37.681 -111.429 9 3.3
PDE 1991 6 25 37.209 -110.358 1 3.0
PDE 1997 10 20 37.834 -111.879 10 3.1
PDE 1998 3 29 38.25 -111.35 3 3.2
PDE 2002 9 22 36.78 -111.31 1 2.9
PDE 2002 9 26 37.41 -110.53 3 3.0
PDE 2003 4 17 39.516 -111.857 0 4.4
PDE 2003 7 8 36.95 -111.79 6 3.3
PDE 2003 11 7 36.96 -111.77 9 3.1
PDE 2003 12 29 38.324 -110.56 4 2.9
PDE 2005 4 8 37.593 -111.066 6 2.8
PDE 2005 8 20 37.89 -111.77 0 3.2

ATTACHMENT C
QUATERNARY FAULTS AND FOLDS WITHIN 200
MILES OF SHOOTARING CANYON SITE

ATTACHMENT C.1
DETERMINISTIC CHARACTERISTICS
Appendix C.1: Quaternary faults and folds within 200 miles of Shootaring Canyon site - Deterministic Characteristics
Mean
Mean
+1SD Mean
Mean
+1SD Mean
Mean
+1SD Mean
Mean
+1SD Mean
Mean
+1SD
Random Earthquake 15 6.3 0.12 0.19 0.20 0.33 0.14 0.23 0.13 0.23 0.15 0.24
Fault 1, Bright Angel Fault Zone (Class B) 2514 Class B <0.2 4.0 N95.8 0.13 0.22 0.20 0.35 0.17 0.28 0.16 0.28 0.16 0.28
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault Zone (Class B) 2514 Class B <0.2 10.0 N136.2 0.13 0.21 0.21 0.36 0.16 0.25 0.14 0.25 0.16 0.27
Fault 3, Bright Angel Fault Zone (Class B) 2514 Class B <0.2 23.0 N356.7 0.07 0.10 0.10 0.16 0.08 0.12 0.07 0.12 0.08 0.13
Needles fault zone (Class B) 2507 Class B <0.2 28.5 60 6.8 0.04 0.06 0.06 0.09 0.05 0.07 0.04 0.07 0.05 0.07
Thousand Lake fault 2506 <750,000 <0.2 48.3 90 7.0 0.03 0.05 0.04 0.07 0.04 0.06 0.03 0.06 0.03 0.06
Shay graben faults (Class B) 2513 Class B <0.2 39.5 88 6.9 0.03 0.05 0.04 0.07 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.06 0.03 0.06
Aquarius and Awapa Plateaus faults 2505 <1,600,000 <0.2 35.7 89 6.9 0.03 0.05 0.04 0.06 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.05
Paunsaugunt fault 2504 <1,600,000 <0.2 44.1 114 7.0 0.02 0.04 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.04
Sevier/Toroweap fault zone, Sevier section 997a <130,000 0.2-1 88.7 142 7.3 0.02 0.04 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.04
Moab fault and Spanish Valley faults (Class B) 2476 Class B <0.2 72.4 N 137 7.2 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.04
West Kaibab fault system 994 <1,600,000 <0.2 82.9 N 152 7.3 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.04
Wasatch monocline (Class B) 2450 <1,600,000 <0.2 103.5 164 7.4 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.04
Joes Valley fault zone, west fault 2453 <15,000 0.2-1 57.2 137 7.1 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.04
Southern Joes Valley fault zone 2456 <750,000 <0.2 47.2 137 7.0 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.04
Central Kaibab fault system 993 <1,600,000 <0.2 71.5 N 157 7.2 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.04
Salt and Cache Valleys faults (Class B) 2474 Class B <0.2 57.9 N 147 7.1 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.04
Lisbon Valley fault zone (Class B) 2511 <1,600,000 <0.2 37.5 134 6.9 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03
Sevier fault 2355 <1,600,000 <0.2 41.3 N 139 7.0 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03
Sevier Valley-Marysvale-Circleville area faults 2500 <750,000 <0.2 34.9 137 6.9 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03
Ten Mile graben faults (Class B) 2473 Class B <0.2 34.6 N 137 6.9 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03
Joes Valley fault zone, east fault 2455 <15,000 0.2-1 56.6 159 7.1 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03
Markagunt Plateau faults (Class B) 2535 <750,000 <0.2 56.4 162 7.1 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03
Paradox Valley graben (Class B) 2286 <1,600,000 <0.2 56.4 N 162 7.1 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03
Sevier/Toroweap fault zone, northern Toroweap
section 997b <130,000 <0.2 80.9 182 7.3 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03
Eminence fault zone 992 <1,600,000 <0.2 36.0 155 6.9 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03
Price River area faults (Class B) 2457 <1,600,000 <0.2 50.9 N 174 7.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03
Bright Angel fault zone 991 <1,600,000 <0.2 66.0 N 193 7.2 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03
Sevier Valley faults and folds (Class B) 2537 <130,000 <0.2 23.6 145 6.7 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03
Big Gypsum Valley graben (Class B) 2288 Class B <0.2 33.1 160 6.8 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03
Valley Mountains monocline (Class B) 2449 <1,600,000 <0.2 38.6 174 6.9 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03
Ryan Creek fault zone 2263 <1,600,000 <0.2 39.5 N 181 6.9 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03
PGA
Spudich et al.
(1999) for rock
sites
Abrahamson
and Silva
(1997) for
normal faults
Campbell and
Bozorgnia
(2003)
corrected
Lognormal
Mean
Campbell and
Bozorgnia
(2007)
Fault
Type
MCE2 Distance
from site to
surface
trace of
fault, (km)
Name of Fault ID
Number
Age of Most
Recent
Prehistoric
Deformation
(ya)1
Slip-rate
(mm/yr)
Fault
Length
(km)
Shootaring QuaternaryFaults_Round 3 Int.xls
1 of 2
181501
Appendix C.1: Quaternary faults and folds within 200 miles of Shootaring Canyon site - Deterministic Characteristics
Mean
Mean
+1SD Mean
Mean
+1SD Mean
Mean
+1SD Mean
Mean
+1SD Mean
Mean
+1SD
PGA
Spudich et al.
(1999) for rock
sites
Abrahamson
and Silva
(1997) for
normal faults
Campbell and
Bozorgnia
(2003)
corrected
Lognormal
Mean
Campbell and
Bozorgnia
(2007)
Fault
Type
MCE2 Distance
from site to
surface
trace of
fault, (km)
Name of Fault ID
Number
Age of Most
Recent
Prehistoric
Deformation
(ya)1
Slip-rate
(mm/yr)
Fault
Length
(km)
Tushar Mountains (east side) fault 2501 <1,600,000 <0.2 18.5 148 6.5 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03
Beaver Basin faults, eastern margin faults 2492a <15,000 <0.2 34.2 175 6.9 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03
Beaver Basin faults, intrabasin faults 2492b <15,000 <0.2 38.9 184 6.9 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03
Joes Valley fault zone, intragraben faults 2454 <15,000 <0.2 34.0 181 6.9 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Unnamed faults east of Atkinson Masa 2269 <1,600,000 <0.2 41.1 N 194 7.0 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Gunnison fault 2445 <15,000 <0.2 42.0 N 197 7.0 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
White Mountain area faults 2451 <1,600,000 <0.2 16.4 157 6.5 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02
Main Street fault zone 1002 <130,000 <0.2 87.3 N 266 7.3 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02
Mineral Mountains (west side) faults 2489 <15,000 <0.2 36.6 203 6.9 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02
Clear Lake fault zone (Class B) 2436 <15,000 <0.2 35.5 215 6.9 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02
Hurricane fault zone, Anderson Junction section 998c <15,000 0.2-1 42.2 233 7.0 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02
Wasatch fault zone, Nephi section 2351h <15,000 1-5 43.1 240 7.0 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02
San Francisco Mountains (west side) fault 2486 <750,000 <0.2 41.4 238 7.0 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02
Cricket Mountains (west side) fault 2460 <15,000 <0.2 41.0 238 7.0 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02
Wah Wah Mountains (south end near Lund)
fault 2485 <130,000 <0.2 40.2 239 6.9 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02
Hurricane fault zone, southern section 998f <1,600,000 <0.2 66.6 N 282 7.2 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02
1 ya = years ago
2 Wells and Coppersmith, 1994
Class B=Geologic evidence demonstrates the existence of Quaternary deformation, but either (1) the fault might not extend deeply enough to be a potential source
of significant earthquakes, or (2) the currently available geologic evidence is too strong to confidently assign the feature to Class C but not strong enough to assign it to Class A.
Fault Type: N=normal, R=reverse
Shootaring QuaternaryFaults_Round 3 Int.xls
2 of 2
181501

ATTACHMENT C.2
PROBABILISTIC CHARACTERISTICS
Appendix C.2: Quaternary faults and folds capable of generating 0.05 g or greater at Shootaring Canyon site - Probabilistic Characteristics
Fault 1, Bright Angel Fault Zone (Class B) 2514 Class B 0.1
60 (0.6)
40 (0.2)
80 (0.2)
15 (0.6)
12 (0.2)
20 (0.2)
0.02 (0.6)
0.2 (0.2)
0.005 (0.2)
5.8 (0.6)
5.5 (0.2)
6.1 (0.2)
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault Zone (Class B) 2514 Class B 0.5
60 (0.6)
40 (0.2)
80 (0.2)
15 (0.6)
12 (0.2)
20 (0.2)
0.02 (0.6)
0.2 (0.2)
0.005 (0.2)
6.2 (0.6)
6.5 (0.2)
5.9 (0.2)
Fault 3, Bright Angel Fault Zone (Class B) 2514 Class B 0.1
60 (0.6)
40 (0.2)
80 (0.2)
15 (0.6)
12 (0.2)
20 (0.2)
0.02 (0.6)
0.2 (0.2)
0.005 (0.2)
6.7 (0.6)
7.0 (0.2)
6.4 (0.2)
Needles fault zone (Class B) 2507 Class B 0
60 (0.6)
40 (0.2)
80 (0.2)
15 (0.6)
12 (0.2)
20 (0.2)
0.02 (0.6)
0.2 (0.2)
0.005 (0.2)
6.8 (0.6)
7.1 (0.2)
6.5 (0.2)
Thousand Lake fault 2506 <750,000 1
60 (0.6)
40 (0.2)
80 (0.2)
15 (0.6)
12 (0.2)
20 (0.2)
0.02 (0.6)
0.2 (0.2)
0.005 (0.2)
7.0 (0.6)
7.3 (0.2)
6.7 (0.2)
Shay graben faults (Class B) 2513 Class B 0.1
60 (0.6)
40 (0.2)
80 (0.2)
15 (0.6)
12 (0.2)
20 (0.2)
0.02 (0.6)
0.2 (0.2)
0.005 (0.2)
6.9 (0.6)
7.2 (0.2)
6.6 (0.2)
Aquarius and Awapa Plateaus faults 2505 <1,600,000 1
60 (0.6)
40 (0.2)
80 (0.2)
15 (0.6)
12 (0.2)
20 (0.2)
0.02 (0.6)
0.2 (0.2)
0.005 (0.2)
6.9 (0.6)
7.2 (0.2)
6.6 (0.2)
Dip 2
(degrees)
Maximum
Seismogenic
Depth 2 (km)
MCE2,3 Rate of
Activity
(mm/yr) 2
Probability
of Activity
Name of Fault ID
Number
Age of Most
Recent
Prehistoric
Deformation
(ya)1
1 ya = years ago
2 Number in parentheses represents weights for each parameter
3 Wells and Coppersmith, 1994
Class B=Geologic evidence demonstrates the existence of Quaternary deformation, but either (1) the fault might not extend deeply
enough to be a potential source of significant earthquakes, or (2) the currently available geologic evidence is too strong to confidently
assign the feature to Class C but not strong enough to assign it to Class A.
Shootaring QuaternaryFaults_Round 3 Int.xls 1 of 1 181501

ATTACHMENT D
DESCRIPTION OF FAULTS WITHIN PROJECT AREA,
FROM USGS ET AL. 2006

ATTACHMENT E
EZ-FRISK SOFTWARE INPUT

***********************************************
***** EZ-FRISK *****
***** SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS DEFINITION *****
***** RISK ENGINEERING, INC. *****
***** BOULDER, CO USA *****
***********************************************

PROGRAM VERSION
EZ-FRISK 7.25

ANALYSIS TITLE:
Seismic Hazard Analysis Round Three Interrogatory

ANALYSIS TYPE:
Single Site Analysis

SITE COORDINATES
Latitude 37.72
Longitude -110.7

HAZARD DEAGGREGATION
Status: ON
Period: PGA
Amplitude: 0.21
Bin Configuration
Magnitude
Scale: Moment Magnitude
Lowest Value: 5 Mw
Highest Value: 9 Mw
Bin Size: 0.1
Distance
Lowest Value: 0 km
Highest Value: 102.5 km
Bin Size: 2.5 km
Epsilon
Lowest Value: -2.2
Highest Value: 4.2
Bin Size: 0.2

SOIL AMPLIFICATION
Method: Do not use soil amplification

ATTENUATION EQUATION SITE PARAMETERS
Vs30 (m/s): 760
Z25 (km): 0

AMPLITUDES - Acceleration (g)
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.02
0.05
0.07
0.1
0.2
0.21
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.7
1
2
3

PERIODS (s)
PGA
5.e-002
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.75
1.
2.
3.
4.

DETERMINISTIC FRACTILES

PLOTTING PARAMETERS
Period at which to plot PGA: 0.0001

CALCULATIONAL PARAMETERS
Fault Seismic Sources -
Down dip integration increment : 1 km
Horizontal integration increment : 1 km
Number rupture length per EarthQuake : 4
Include near-source directivity : NO
Area Seismic Sources -
Maximum inclusion distance : 1000 km
Vertical integration increment : 3 km
Number of rupture azimuths : 3
Minimum epicentral distance step : 0.5 km
Maximum epicentral distance step : 10 km
Background Seismic Sources -
Maximum inclusion distance : 400 km
Default number of rupture azimuths : 10
Maximum distance for default azimuths : 20 km
Minimum distance for one azimuth : 70
All Seismic Sources -
Magnitude integration step : 0.1 M
Apply magnitude scaling : NO

ATTENUATION EQUATIONS

Name: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Database: C:\Program Files\EZ-FRISK 7.25\Files\standard.bin-attendb
Base: Abrahamson-Silva 1997
Truncation Type: Trunc Sigma*Value
Truncation Value: 3
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Distance Type: Distance To Rupture

Name: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002 Gridded
Database: C:\Program Files\EZ-FRISK 7.25\Files\standard.bin-attendb
Base: Abrahamson-Silva 1997
Truncation Type: Trunc Sigma*Value
Truncation Value: 3
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Distance Type: Distance To Rupture

Name: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2008) NGA 3 sigma
Database: C:\Documents and Settings\roslyn.stern\Local Settings\Application Data\Risk
Engineering\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-attendb
Base: Campbell-Bozorgnia 2008 NGA
Truncation Type: Trunc Sigma*Value
Truncation Value: 3
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Distance Type: Distance To Rupture

Name: Spudich 1999 Rock USGS 2002
Database: C:\Program Files\EZ-FRISK 7.25\Files\standard.bin-attendb
Base: Spudich 1997/99
Truncation Type: Trunc Sigma*Value
Truncation Value: 3
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Distance Type: Horizontal Distance To Rupture

SEISMIC SOURCES

Name: Bright Angel Fault Zone - Fault 1
Region: Utah
Category: Fault Seismic Source
Database: C:\Documents and Settings\roslyn.stern\Local Settings\Application Data\Risk
Engineering\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-faultdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.10000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 5.8

Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15

Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta
Mean Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.1 Slip 2.000e-002 5.500000 6.100000 1.842100
5.800000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 5.000e-003 5.500000 6.100000 1.842100
5.800000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 5.500000 6.100000 1.842100
5.800000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 5.500000 6.100000 0.000000
5.800000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 5.500000 6.100000 0.000000
5.800000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 5.500000 6.100000 0.000000
5.800000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000

Rupture Length Parameters
Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa Ba
Sigw
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000

Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
37.7529 -110.6010
37.7824 -110.5760

Attenuation Equations for Source:
Name: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Name: Spudich 1999 Rock USGS 2002
Name: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2008) NGA 3 sigma

*******************************************

Name: Bright Angel Fault Zone - Fault 2
Region: Utah
Category: Fault Seismic Source
Database: C:\Documents and Settings\roslyn.stern\Local Settings\Application Data\Risk
Engineering\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-faultdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.50000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 6.2

Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15

Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta
Mean Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.1 Slip 2.000e-002 5.900000 6.500000 1.842100
6.200000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 5.000e-003 5.900000 6.500000 1.842100
6.200000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 5.900000 6.500000 1.842100
6.200000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 5.900000 6.500000 0.000000
6.200000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 5.900000 6.500000 0.000000
6.200000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 5.900000 6.500000 0.000000
6.200000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000

Rupture Length Parameters
Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa Ba
Sigw
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000

Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
37.7711 -110.4590
37.6928 -110.5040

Attenuation Equations for Source:
Name: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Name: Spudich 1999 Rock USGS 2002
Name: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2008) NGA 3 sigma

*******************************************

Name: Bright Angel Fault Zone - Fault 3
Region: Utah
Category: Fault Seismic Source
Database: C:\Documents and Settings\roslyn.stern\Local Settings\Application Data\Risk
Engineering\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-faultdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.10000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 6.7

Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
120 120 0 0.1 15

Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta
Mean Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.360000 6.960000 1.842100
6.660000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.360000 6.960000 1.842100
6.660000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 1.000e-001 6.360000 6.960000 1.842100
6.660000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.360000 6.960000 0.000000
6.660000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.360000 6.960000 0.000000
6.660000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 1.000e-001 6.360000 6.960000 0.000000
6.660000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000

Rupture Length Parameters
Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa Ba
Sigw
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000

Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
37.3762 -110.4140
37.6652 -110.2590

Attenuation Equations for Source:
Name: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Name: Spudich 1999 Rock USGS 2002
Name: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2008) NGA 3 sigma

*******************************************

Name: Needles
Region: Utah
Category: Fault Seismic Source
Database: C:\Documents and Settings\roslyn.stern\Local Settings\Application Data\Risk
Engineering\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-faultdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.00000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 6.8

Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15

Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta
Mean Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.500000 7.100000 1.842100
6.800000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.500000 7.100000 1.842100
6.800000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.500000 7.100000 1.842100
6.800000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.500000 7.100000 0.000000
6.800000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.500000 7.100000 0.000000
6.800000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.500000 7.100000 0.000000
6.800000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000

Rupture Length Parameters
Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa Ba
Sigw
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000

Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.1900 -109.8600
38.0400 -110.1600

Attenuation Equations for Source:
Name: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Name: Spudich 1999 Rock USGS 2002
Name: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2008) NGA 3 sigma

*******************************************

Name: Shay graben
Region: Utah
Category: Fault Seismic Source
Database: C:\Documents and Settings\roslyn.stern\Local Settings\Application Data\Risk
Engineering\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-faultdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.10000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 6.9

Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
120 120 0 0.1 15

Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta
Mean Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.600000 7.200000 1.842100
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.600000 7.200000 1.842100
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 1.000e-001 6.600000 7.200000 1.842100
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 1.000e-001 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000

Rupture Length Parameters
Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa Ba
Sigw
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000

Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.0400 -109.2800
37.9100 -109.7200

Attenuation Equations for Source:
Name: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Name: Spudich 1999 Rock USGS 2002
Name: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2008) NGA 3 sigma

*******************************************

Name: Ext Gridded
Region: WUS - USGS2002 Bkgd
Category: Gridded Seismic Source
Database: C:\Documents and Settings\roslyn.stern\Local Settings\Application Data\Risk
Engineering\EZ-FRISK\Regions\USGS 2002 v210\Files\Background Data\usgs2002.xml-gridSsDb
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude

Attenuation Equations for Source:
Name: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002 Gridded
Name: Spudich 1999 Rock USGS 2002
Name: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2008) NGA 3 sigma

*******************************************

Name: Aquarius and Awapa plateau 40_12
Region: Utah
Category: Fault Seismic Source
Database: C:\Documents and Settings\roslyn.stern\Local Settings\Application Data\Risk
Engineering\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-faultdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.04000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 6.9

Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
40 40 0 0.1 12

Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta
Mean Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.600000 7.200000 1.842100
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.600000 7.200000 1.842100
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.600000 7.200000 1.842100
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000

Rupture Length Parameters
Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa Ba
Sigw
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000

Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.0300 -111.7800
38.1700 -111.5200

Attenuation Equations for Source:
Name: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Name: Spudich 1999 Rock USGS 2002
Name: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2008) NGA 3 sigma

*******************************************

Name: Aquarius and Awapa plateau 40_15
Region: Utah
Category: Fault Seismic Source
Database: C:\Documents and Settings\roslyn.stern\Local Settings\Application Data\Risk
Engineering\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-faultdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.12000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 6.9

Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
40 40 0 0.1 15

Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta
Mean Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.600000 7.200000 1.842100
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.600000 7.200000 1.842100
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.600000 7.200000 1.842100
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000

Rupture Length Parameters
Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa Ba
Sigw
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000

Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.0300 -111.7800
38.1700 -111.5200

Attenuation Equations for Source:
Name: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Name: Spudich 1999 Rock USGS 2002
Name: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2008) NGA 3 sigma

*******************************************

Name: Aquarius and Awapa plateau 40_20
Region: Utah
Category: Fault Seismic Source
Database: C:\Documents and Settings\roslyn.stern\Local Settings\Application Data\Risk
Engineering\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-faultdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.03990000
Deterministic Magnitude: 6.9

Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
40 40 0 0.1 20

Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta
Mean Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.600000 7.200000 1.842100
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.600000 7.200000 1.842100
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.600000 7.200000 1.842100
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000

Rupture Length Parameters
Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa Ba
Sigw
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000

Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.0300 -111.7800
38.1700 -111.5200

Attenuation Equations for Source:
Name: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Name: Spudich 1999 Rock USGS 2002
Name: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2008) NGA 3 sigma

*******************************************

Name: Aquarius and Awapa plateau 60_12
Region: Utah
Category: Fault Seismic Source
Database: C:\Documents and Settings\roslyn.stern\Local Settings\Application Data\Risk
Engineering\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-faultdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.12000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 6.9

Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 12

Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta
Mean Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.600000 7.200000 1.842100
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.600000 7.200000 1.842100
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.600000 7.200000 1.842100
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000

Rupture Length Parameters
Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa Ba
Sigw
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000

Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.0300 -111.7800
38.1700 -111.5200

Attenuation Equations for Source:
Name: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Name: Spudich 1999 Rock USGS 2002
Name: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2008) NGA 3 sigma

*******************************************

Name: Aquarius and Awapa plateau 60_15
Region: Utah
Category: Fault Seismic Source
Database: C:\Documents and Settings\roslyn.stern\Local Settings\Application Data\Risk
Engineering\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-faultdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.36000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 6.9

Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15

Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta
Mean Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.600000 7.200000 1.842100
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.600000 7.200000 1.842100
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.600000 7.200000 1.842100
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000

Rupture Length Parameters
Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa Ba
Sigw
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000

Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.0300 -111.7800
38.1700 -111.5200

Attenuation Equations for Source:
Name: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Name: Spudich 1999 Rock USGS 2002
Name: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2008) NGA 3 sigma

*******************************************

Name: Aquarius and Awapa plateau 60_20
Region: Utah
Category: Fault Seismic Source
Database: C:\Documents and Settings\roslyn.stern\Local Settings\Application Data\Risk
Engineering\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-faultdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.12000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 6.9

Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 20

Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta
Mean Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.600000 7.200000 1.842100
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.600000 7.200000 1.842100
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.600000 7.200000 1.842100
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000

Rupture Length Parameters
Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa Ba
Sigw
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000

Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.0300 -111.7800
38.1700 -111.5200

Attenuation Equations for Source:
Name: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Name: Spudich 1999 Rock USGS 2002
Name: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2008) NGA 3 sigma

*******************************************

Name: Aquarius and Awapa plateau 80_12
Region: Utah
Category: Fault Seismic Source
Database: C:\Documents and Settings\roslyn.stern\Local Settings\Application Data\Risk
Engineering\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-faultdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.04000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 6.9

Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
80 80 0 0.1 12

Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta
Mean Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.600000 7.200000 1.842100
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.600000 7.200000 1.842100
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.600000 7.200000 1.842100
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000

Rupture Length Parameters
Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa Ba
Sigw
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000

Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.0300 -111.7800
38.1700 -111.5200

Attenuation Equations for Source:
Name: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Name: Spudich 1999 Rock USGS 2002
Name: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2008) NGA 3 sigma

*******************************************

Name: Aquarius and Awapa plateau 80_15
Region: Utah
Category: Fault Seismic Source
Database: C:\Documents and Settings\roslyn.stern\Local Settings\Application Data\Risk
Engineering\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-faultdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.12000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 6.9

Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
80 80 0 0.1 15

Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta
Mean Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.600000 7.200000 1.842100
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.600000 7.200000 1.842100
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.600000 7.200000 1.842100
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000

Rupture Length Parameters
Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa Ba
Sigw
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000

Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.0300 -111.7800
38.1700 -111.5200

Attenuation Equations for Source:
Name: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Name: Spudich 1999 Rock USGS 2002
Name: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2008) NGA 3 sigma

*******************************************

Name: Aquarius and Awapa plateau 80_20
Region: Utah
Category: Fault Seismic Source
Database: C:\Documents and Settings\roslyn.stern\Local Settings\Application Data\Risk
Engineering\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-faultdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.04000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 6.9

Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
80 80 0 0.1 20

Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta
Mean Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.600000 7.200000 1.842100
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.600000 7.200000 1.842100
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.600000 7.200000 1.842100
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000
6.900000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000

Rupture Length Parameters
Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa Ba
Sigw
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000

Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.0300 -111.7800
38.1700 -111.5200

Attenuation Equations for Source:
Name: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Name: Spudich 1999 Rock USGS 2002
Name: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2008) NGA 3 sigma

*******************************************

Name: Thousand Lakes 40_12
Region: Utah
Category: Fault Seismic Source
Database: C:\Documents and Settings\roslyn.stern\Local Settings\Application Data\Risk
Engineering\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-faultdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.04000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7

Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
40 40 0 0.1 12

Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta
Mean Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.700000 7.300000 1.842100
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.700000 7.300000 1.842100
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.700000 7.300000 1.842100
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000

Rupture Length Parameters
Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa Ba
Sigw
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000

Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.1200 -111.5900
38.5500 -111.5200

Attenuation Equations for Source:
Name: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Name: Spudich 1999 Rock USGS 2002
Name: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2008) NGA 3 sigma

*******************************************

Name: Thousand Lakes 40_15
Region: Utah
Category: Fault Seismic Source
Database: C:\Documents and Settings\roslyn.stern\Local Settings\Application Data\Risk
Engineering\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-faultdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.12000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7

Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
40 40 0 0.1 15

Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta
Mean Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.700000 7.300000 1.842100
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.700000 7.300000 1.842100
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.700000 7.300000 1.842100
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000

Rupture Length Parameters
Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa Ba
Sigw
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000

Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.1200 -111.5900
38.5500 -111.5200

Attenuation Equations for Source:
Name: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Name: Spudich 1999 Rock USGS 2002
Name: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2008) NGA 3 sigma

*******************************************

Name: Thousand Lakes 40_20
Region: Utah
Category: Fault Seismic Source
Database: C:\Documents and Settings\roslyn.stern\Local Settings\Application Data\Risk
Engineering\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-faultdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.04000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7

Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
40 40 0 0.1 20

Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta
Mean Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.700000 7.300000 1.842100
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.700000 7.300000 1.842100
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.700000 7.300000 1.842100
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000

Rupture Length Parameters
Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa Ba
Sigw
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000

Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.1200 -111.5900
38.5500 -111.5200

Attenuation Equations for Source:
Name: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Name: Spudich 1999 Rock USGS 2002
Name: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2008) NGA 3 sigma

*******************************************

Name: Thousand Lakes 60_12
Region: Utah
Category: Fault Seismic Source
Database: C:\Documents and Settings\roslyn.stern\Local Settings\Application Data\Risk
Engineering\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-faultdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.12000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7

Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 12

Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta
Mean Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.700000 7.300000 1.842100
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.700000 7.300000 1.842100
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.700000 7.300000 1.842100
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000

Rupture Length Parameters
Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa Ba
Sigw
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000

Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.1200 -111.5900
38.5500 -111.5200

Attenuation Equations for Source:
Name: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Name: Spudich 1999 Rock USGS 2002
Name: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2008) NGA 3 sigma

*******************************************

Name: Thousand Lakes 60_15
Region: Utah
Category: Fault Seismic Source
Database: C:\Documents and Settings\roslyn.stern\Local Settings\Application Data\Risk
Engineering\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-faultdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.36000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7

Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15

Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta
Mean Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.700000 7.300000 1.842100
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.700000 7.300000 1.842100
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.700000 7.300000 1.842100
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000

Rupture Length Parameters
Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa Ba
Sigw
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000

Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.1200 -111.5900
38.5500 -111.5200

Attenuation Equations for Source:
Name: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Name: Spudich 1999 Rock USGS 2002
Name: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2008) NGA 3 sigma

*******************************************

Name: Thousand Lakes 60_20
Region: Utah
Category: Fault Seismic Source
Database: C:\Documents and Settings\roslyn.stern\Local Settings\Application Data\Risk
Engineering\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-faultdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.12000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7

Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 20

Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta
Mean Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.700000 7.300000 1.842100
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.700000 7.300000 1.842100
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.700000 7.300000 1.842100
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000

Rupture Length Parameters
Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa Ba
Sigw
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000

Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.1200 -111.5900
38.5500 -111.5200

Attenuation Equations for Source:
Name: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Name: Spudich 1999 Rock USGS 2002
Name: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2008) NGA 3 sigma

*******************************************

Name: Thousand Lakes 80_12
Region: Utah
Category: Fault Seismic Source
Database: C:\Documents and Settings\roslyn.stern\Local Settings\Application Data\Risk
Engineering\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-faultdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.04000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7

Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
80 80 0 0.1 12

Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta
Mean Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.700000 7.300000 1.842100
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.700000 7.300000 1.842100
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.700000 7.300000 1.842100
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000

Rupture Length Parameters
Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa Ba
Sigw
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000

Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.1200 -111.5900
38.5500 -111.5200

Attenuation Equations for Source:
Name: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Name: Spudich 1999 Rock USGS 2002
Name: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2008) NGA 3 sigma

*******************************************

Name: Thousand Lakes 80_15
Region: Utah
Category: Fault Seismic Source
Database: C:\Documents and Settings\roslyn.stern\Local Settings\Application Data\Risk
Engineering\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-faultdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.12000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7

Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
80 80 0 0.1 15

Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta
Mean Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.700000 7.300000 1.842100
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.700000 7.300000 1.842100
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.700000 7.300000 1.842100
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000

Rupture Length Parameters
Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa Ba
Sigw
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000

Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.1200 -111.5900
38.5500 -111.5200

Attenuation Equations for Source:
Name: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Name: Spudich 1999 Rock USGS 2002
Name: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2008) NGA 3 sigma

*******************************************

Name: Thousand Lakes 80_20
Region: Utah
Category: Fault Seismic Source
Database: C:\Documents and Settings\roslyn.stern\Local Settings\Application Data\Risk
Engineering\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-faultdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.04000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7

Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
80 80 0 0.1 20

Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta
Mean Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.700000 7.300000 1.842100
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.700000 7.300000 1.842100
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.700000 7.300000 1.842100
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000
7.000000 0.120000 0.000000 0.000000

Rupture Length Parameters
Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa Ba
Sigw
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000
4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 4.000000 0.000000 0.010000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000

Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.1200 -111.5900
38.5500 -111.5200

Attenuation Equations for Source:
Name: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Name: Spudich 1999 Rock USGS 2002
Name: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2008) NGA 3 sigma

*******************************************

Name: 200-mile radius circle around Shootaring
Region: Utah
Category: Area Seismic Source
Database: C:\Documents and Settings\roslyn.stern\Local Settings\Application Data\Risk
Engineering\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-areadb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.25
Minimum Depth: 3 km
Maximum Depth: 20 km

Boundary Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
-109.6290 40.4976
-109.5150 40.4693
-108.4690 40.0373
-107.6650 39.3720
-107.1800 38.5446
-107.0530 37.6406
-107.2820 36.7494
-107.8350 35.9565
-108.2390 35.6021
-108.6510 35.3360
-109.4470 35.0011
-110.7480 34.8185
-111.8400 34.9685
-112.8290 35.3814
-113.6260 36.0196
-114.1520 36.8545
-114.3510 37.7207
-114.1920 38.6220
-113.6760 39.4386
-112.8470 40.0860
-111.7850 40.4946
-109.6290 40.4976

Magnitude Recurrence Distribution:
Minimum Magnitude: 4 Mw
Maximum Magnitude: 6.3 Mw
Activity Rate: 1.55
Beta: 1.96
Al: -4
Bl: 0

Attenuation Equations for Source:
Name: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002 Gridded
Name: Spudich 1999 Rock USGS 2002
Name: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2008) NGA 3 sigma

*******************************************

Name: Wong et al. 1996
Region: Utah
Category: Area Seismic Source
Database: C:\Documents and Settings\roslyn.stern\Local Settings\Application Data\Risk
Engineering\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-areadb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.25
Minimum Depth: 3 km
Maximum Depth: 20 km

Boundary Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
-112.0000 39.4000
-108.6000 39.4000
-108.6000 35.2000
-112.0000 35.2000
-112.0000 39.4000

Magnitude Recurrence Distribution:
Minimum Magnitude: 3 Mw
Maximum Magnitude: 6 Mw
Activity Rate: 1.83
Beta: 2.12
Al: -4
Bl: 0

Attenuation Equations for Source:
Name: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002 Gridded
Name: Spudich 1999 Rock USGS 2002
Name: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2008) NGA 3 sigma

*******************************************

Echo File Creation Time: 09:55:42 Monday, March 10, 2008

APPENDIX C
FIELD INVESTIGATIONS

APPENDIX C.1
WOODWARD-CLYDE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS

APPENDIX C.1.1
LOGS OF BORINGS AND TEST PITS
WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS 1977 FIELD INVESTIGATION
(WOODWARD-CLYDE, 1978D)

APPENDIX C.1.2
FIELD AND LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS 1977 FIELD INVESTIGATION
(WOODWARD-CLYDE, 1978D)

APPENDIX C.1.3
FIELD TEST RESULTS AND BORING AND TEST PIT LOGS
WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS 1979 FIELD INVESTIGATION
(WOODWARD-CLYDE, 1979)

APPENDIX C.1.4
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS 1979 FIELD INVESTIGATION
(WOODWARD-CLYDE, 1979)

APPENDIX C.2
HYDRO-ENGINEERING GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS
top bottom
Backhoe Pit meas. (in.)meas. (in.)Descriptions
CV4 0 18 tan sand, rocks and clay
CV4 18 30 very fine red sand, hard
DA1 0 39.6 rock, sand and clay
DA1 39.6 48 brown clay w/little green clay
DD4 0 0 gravel @ surface
DD4 0 17 very fine red sand, some rock
DD5 0 12 gravel & red fine sand
DD5 12 17 large rocks & clay
DD6 0 4 rock & red sand
DD6 4 17 red very fine sand
DD7 0 12 gravel & red sand
DD7 12 17 very fine sand
DD8 0 6 tan very fine sand
DD8 6 12 clay, rock and sand
DD9 0 6 tan, very fine sand
DD9 6 12 clay, rock and sand
ED4 0 12 red sand and clay
ED4 12 48 brown clay
OP33 0 15.6 red very fine sand
OP33 15.6 34.8 gray sand ore
OP33 34.8 40.8 tan fine sand
OP33 40.8 46.8 red very fine sand
T7 0 44.4 red very fine sand
T7 44.4 46.8 tails slimes
T7 46.8 rock layer
LITHOLOGIC LOGS
TABLE A-1. LITHOLOGIC LOGS OF BACKHOE PITS
A - 2
C:\Projects\2005-50\rec plan 12-05\LITH LOGS.pdfDecember 2005
top bottom
Drill Holes meas. (in.)meas. (in.)Descriptions
CV1 0 36 tan rock, sand and clay
CV1 36 60 red very fine sand
CV1 60 228 red very fine sand
CV1 228 264 brown clay
CV1 264 324 red very fine
CV2 0 36 tan rock, sand and clay
CV2 36 300 very fine red sand
CV2 300 360 very fine red sand
CV2 360 492 very fine red sand
CV2 492 564 brown clay
CV2 564 588 white very fine sandstone, Entrada
CV2 588 600 red silty, very fine sandstone
CV3 0 30 tan rock, sand and clay
CV3 30 120 red very fine sand, dry
CV3 120 180 red very fine sand w/ little moisture
CV3 180 216 red very fine sand w/ little moisture
CV3 216 258 brown clay, dry
CV3 258 300 red very fine sandstone, Entrada
ED1 0 12 rock, sand and clay
ED1 12 48 red very fine sand
ED1 48 144 tan very fine sand and clay
ED1 144 162 brown clay
ED1 162 180 red very fine sandstone, Entrada
ED3 0 12 rock, sand and clay
ED3 12 53 tan very fine silty sand
ED3 54 72 red very fine sand
ED3 72 102 brown clay
ED3 102 120 red very fine sandstone, Entrada
ND1 0 12 rock, clay and sand
ND1 12 60 tan very fine sand
ND1 60 72
tan & brown very fine sand w/ piece of wood &
plastic
ND1 72 84 concrete
ND1 84 108 red very fine sand
ND1 108 126 brown clay
ND1 126 144 red very fine sandstone, Entrada
ND2 0 24 rock, clay and sand
ND2 24 84 very fine sand, clays & rocks
ND2 84 120 tan very fine sand, moist
ND2 120 180 brown sand & clay w/ some rock & wood, plastic
ND2 180 240 very fine tan sand
ND2 240 288 very fine tan sand
ND2 288 312 clay
ND3 0 24 rock, sand and clay
ND3 24 48 brown sand & clay w/ some wood
ND3 48 120 tan fine sand
ND3 120 168 tan fine sand
LITHOLOGIC LOGS
TABLE A-2. LITHOLOGIC LOGS OF DRILL HOLES.
A - 3
C:\Projects\2005-50\rec plan 12-05\LITH LOGS.pdfDecember 2005
top bottom
Drill Holes meas. (in.)meas. (in.)Descriptions
LITHOLOGIC LOGS
TABLE A-2. LITHOLOGIC LOGS OF DRILL HOLES. (cont'd.)
ND3 168 180 red very fine sand
ND3 180 204 brown clay
ND3 204 240 red very fine sand, Entrada
ND3 240 white sandstone
T1 0 60 red very fine sand w/some clay
T1 60 90 very fine tan & brown sand w/ some clay
T1 90 108 rock, sand and clay
T1 108 126 red very fine sand
T1 126 162 brown clay
T1 162 174 red very fine sand
T2 0 18 red very fine sand
T2 18 60 tan very fine sand, tails
T2 60 108 tan very fine sand, tails, some slime
T2 108 120 red very fine sand
T2 120 126 brown sand clay
T2 126 168 brown clay
T2 168 180 light brown very fine sand
T3 0 24 red very fine sand
T3 24 60 tan fine sand, tailings
T3 60 96 tan fine sand, tailings w/little moisture
T3 96 204 tan fine sand, tailings w/little moisture
T3 204 216 red very fine sand
T3 216 234 rock and fine sand
T3 234 270 red very fine sand
T3 270 348 brown clay
T3 348 372 red very fine sand, Entrada
T4 0 18 very fine red sand
T4 18 60 tan tailings sand and slimes
T4 60 120 tan tailings sand
T4 120 156 shelby tube
T4 120 192 tan tailings sand
T4 192 216 rock and red very fine sand
T4 216 top of clay
T5 0 24 very fine red sand
T5 24 54 tailings slime
T5 54 66 rock, sand and clay
T5 66 78 red very fine sand
T5 78 clay
T6 0 18 red very fine sand
T6 18 24 tailings slime
T6 24 72 red very fine sand
T6 72 96 gravel, tan sand
T6 96 clay
A - 4
C:\Projects\2005-50\rec plan 12-05\LITH LOGS.pdfDecember 2005
top bottom
Auger Holes meas. (in.)meas. (in.)Descriptions
C1 0 12 red clay w/ some white mudstone
C1 12 36 red very fine sandstone, Entrada
C10 0 8 red clay w/some fine sand
C10 8 42 red clay w/green clay
C10 42 59 very fine red sand
C11 0 9 very fine sand and clay
C11 9 38 red very fine sand
C12 0 34 red clay w/some green sandy mudstone
C12 34 red very fine sandstone
C13 0 38 red clay w/ 20% green mudstone
C13 38 41 very fine red sand
C2 0 12 red clay w/approx. 20% white mudstone
C2 12 24 red clay w/approx. 20% white mudstone
C2 24 36 red very fine sandstone, Entrada
C3 0 34 red clay w/20% mudstone, little 1-6" rock
C3 34 38 red very fine sandstone, Entrada
C5 0 18 red clay w/little red & white mudstone
C5 18 24 very fine red sandstone, Entrada
C7 0 15 red clay
C7 15 21 very fine gray sandstone
C7 21 33 very fine sandstone
C7 33 66 red clay
C7 66 rock
C8 0 17 red clay
C8 17 20 very fine red sand
C8 20 69 clay, red
C8 69 84 very fine red sandstone
C9 0 7 red clay
C9 7 14 very fine red sand
C9 14 50 red clay w/ some green clay
C9 50 60 very fine red sandstone
D96 0 42 red sand
D96 42 72 red sand
D96 72 102 red sand
D97 0 54 red sand
D97 54 66 red sand
D98 0 18 red sand
D98 18 30 red sand
D98 30 42 red sand
D99 0 42 red sand
D99 42 white sand
NA1 0 5 rock, sand and clay
NA1 5 21 very fine red sand
NA1 21 43 red clay w/little green clay
LITHOLOGIC LOGS
TABLE A-3. LITHOLOGIC LOGS OF AUGER HOLES.
A - 5
C:\Projects\2005-50\rec plan 12-05\LITH LOGS.pdfDecember 2005
top bottom
Auger Holes meas. (in.)meas. (in.)Descriptions
LITHOLOGIC LOGS
TABLE A-3. LITHOLOGIC LOGS OF AUGER HOLES. (cont'd.)
NA1 43 49 red clay and very fine sand
NA1 49 54 very fine red sand
NA1 54 85 red clay
NA1 85 86 red very fine sand, Entrada
NA10 0 6 rock, sand and clay
NA10 6 27 red sand, very fine
NA10 27 75 clay
NA10 75 sand
NA11 0 12 rock, sand and clay
NA11 12 30 red very fine sand
NA11 30 58 brown clay w/little green mudstone
NA11 58 64 red very fine sandstone, Entrada
NA12 0 10 rock, sand and clay
NA12 10 20 very fine red sand
NA12 20 55 purple clay w/ some green clay
NA12 55 60 very fine red sandstone, Entrada
NA13 0 10 rock, clay and sand
NA13 10 21 red very fine sand
NA13 21 38 purple clay w/ some green clay
NA13 38 40 very fine red sandstone, Entrada
NA14 0 1 very fine red sand w/ small gravel
NA14 1 15 red very fine sand
NA14 15 53 brown clay w/ green clay
NA14 53 59 red very fine sandstone, Entrada
NA15 0 15 sand, rock and clay
NA15 15 22 red sand
NA15 22 68 clay
NA15 68 red sand
NA16 0 10 rock, sand and clay
NA16 10 25 red sand
NA16 25 55 clay
NA16 55 red sand
NA17 0 12 rock, sand and clay
NA17 12 23 red sand
NA17 23 48 clay
NA17 48 sand
NA18 0 11 rock, sand and clay
NA18 11 24 red sand
NA18 24 72 clay
NA18 72 sand
NA19 0 6 rock, clay and sand
NA19 6 16 sand
NA19 16 73 clay
NA19 73 sand
A - 6
C:\Projects\2005-50\rec plan 12-05\LITH LOGS.pdfDecember 2005
top bottom
Auger Holes meas. (in.)meas. (in.)Descriptions
LITHOLOGIC LOGS
TABLE A-3. LITHOLOGIC LOGS OF AUGER HOLES. (cont'd.)
NA2 0 15 sand, rock and clay
NA2 15 27 very fine red sand
NA2 27 42 red clay
NA2 42 47 very fine red sand, Entrada
NA20 0 10 rock, clay and sand
NA20 10 22 sand
NA20 22 44 clay
NA20 44 sand
NA3 0 7 rock, sand and clay
NA3 7 20 very fine sand
NA3 20 71 red clay
NA4 0 11 rock, sand and clay
NA4 11 20 fine red
NA4 20 78 clay
NA4 78 red Entrada
NA5 0 4 rock, sand and clay
NA5 4 16 red fine sand
NA5 16 21 clay
NA5 21 red Entrada
NA6 0 12 rock, sand and clay
NA6 12 25 red sand
NA6 25 65 clay
NA6 65 sand
NA7 0 5 rock, sand and clay
NA7 5 25 red sand, fine
NA7 25 59 clay
NA7 59 sand
NA8 0 6 rock, sand and clay
NA8 6 18 very fine red sand
NA8 18 29 red clay w/ little green clay
NA8 29 34 red clay & sandy green mudstone
NA8 34 37 red very fine sandstone, Entrada
NA9 0 3 sand, rock and clay
NA9 3 14 very fine red sand
NA9 14 53 red clay w/ some green silty clay
NA9 53 60 red very fine sandstone, Entrada
OP31 0 8.4 red very fine sand
OP31 8.4 42 ore sand, hit rock
A - 7
C:\Projects\2005-50\rec plan 12-05\LITH LOGS.pdfDecember 2005
top bottom
Auger/Backhoe Pit meas. (in.)meas. (in.)Descriptions
C4 0 60
red clay w/ green & brown mudstone approx.
15% up to 4" size
C4 60 66 sand and clay
C4 66 72 very fine red sand, Entrada
C6 0 12 red clay dry, some rock
C6 12 36 moist clay, red, some white sandstone
C6 36 58 Entrada sandstone
ED2 0 24 rock, sand and clay
ED2 24 54 tan very fine sand
ED2 54 60 red sand
ED2 60 126 very fine to very coarse sand
ED2 126 142 clay
ED2 142 180 very fine red sandstone, Entrada
NP1 0 12 rock, sand and clay
NP1 12 21 Sand
NP1 21 38 clay
NP1 38 Sand
NP10 0 16 clay, sand and rock
NP10 16 28 Sand
NP10 28 100 clay
NP10 100 Sand
NP11 0 20 sand, rock and clay
NP11 20 31 sand
NP11 31 86 clay
NP11 86 sand
NP2 0 10 rock, sand and clay
NP2 10 32 red very fine sand
NP2 32 66 red clay w/ some white clay
NP2 66 72 red very fine sandstone, Entrada
NP3 0 10 rock, sand and clay
NP3 10 22 red sand
NP3 22 40 clay
NP3 40 red sand
NP4 0 12 rock, clay and sand
NP4 12 19 red sand
NP4 19 69 clay
NP4 69 sand
NP5 0 7 rock, sand and clay
NP5 7 23 Sand
NP5 23 85 clay
NP5 85 sand
NP6 0 12 rock, clay and sand
NP6 12 18 sand
NP6 18 27 rock, clay and sand
LITHOLOGIC LOGS
TABLE A-4. LITHOLOGIC LOGS OF DRILL OR AUGER HOLE/BACKHOE PITS
A - 8
C:\Projects\2005-50\rec plan 12-05\LITH LOGS.pdfDecember 2005
top bottom
Auger/Backhoe Pit meas. (in.)meas. (in.)Descriptions
LITHOLOGIC LOGS
TABLE A-4. LITHOLOGIC LOGS OF DRILL OR AUGER HOLE/BACKHOE PITS (cont'd.)
NP6 27 45 Sand
NP6 45 87 clay
NP6 87 Sand
NP7 0 12 rock, clay and sand
NP7 12 22.5 Sand
NP7 22.5 53.5 clay
NP7 53.5 sand
NP8 0 10 clay, rock and sand
NP8 10 27 sand
NP8 27 64 clay
NP8 64 sand
NP9 0 21 clay, rock and sand
NP9 21 37 sand
NP9 37 71 clay
NP9 71 sand
OP32 0 4.8 very fine red sand
OP32 4.8 44.4 ore sand
OP32 44.4 55.2 red very fine sand
WP1 0 12 rock, clay and sand
WP1 12 30 Sand
WP1 30 54 clay
WP1 54 Sand
WP2 0 6 rock and clay
WP2 6 19 Sand
WP2 19 23 rock and clay
WP2 23 38 Sand
WP2 38 82 clay
WP2 82 Sand
WP3 0 6 rock and clay
WP3 6 18 Sand
WP3 18 28.5 rock, clay and sand
WP3 28.5 42.5 Sand
WP3 42.5 72.5 clay
WP3 72.5 Sand
WP4 0 11 rock, clay and sand
WP4 11 21 Sand
WP4 21 69 clay
WP4 69 Sand
WP5 0 14 rock, clay and sand
WP5 14 28 Sand
WP5 28 45 rock, clay and sand
WP5 48 51 Sand
WP5 51 91 clay
WP5 91 Sand
A - 9
C:\Projects\2005-50\rec plan 12-05\LITH LOGS.pdfDecember 2005
top bottom
Auger/Backhoe Pit meas. (in.)meas. (in.)Descriptions
LITHOLOGIC LOGS
TABLE A-4. LITHOLOGIC LOGS OF DRILL OR AUGER HOLE/BACKHOE PITS (cont'd.)
WP6 0 4 rock, clay and sand
WP6 4 14 Sand
WP6 14 28 rock, clay and sand
WP6 28 45 Sand
WP6 45 62.5 clay
WP6 62.5 Sand
A - 10
C:\Projects\2005-50\rec plan 12-05\LITH LOGS.pdfDecember 2005
THICKNESS
SAMPLE SITE (FT.)
DS1 1.9
DS2 2.3
RT1 2.1
RT2 2.2
RT3 2.1
RT4 2.0
RT5 2.3
RT6 2.6
RT7 3.6
RT8 3.8
TABLE A-5. TAILINGS DAM ROCK THICKNESS
A - 11
C:\Projects\2005-50\ rec plan 12-05\LITH LOGS.pdf
December 2005

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\appendixes.doc
December 2005
APPENDIX B

GAMMA SURVEY

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\appendixes.doc
December 2005
B - i
APPENDIX B
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page Number
B.1 GAMMA Survey .......................................................................................................B-1

TABLES
B-1 GAMMA Survey .......................................................................................................B-2

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\appendixes.doc
December 2005
B - 1
B. 1 GAMMA Survey

A gamma survey was conducted to define the areas in the Shootaring mill and tailings area with
elevated soil concentrations of radionuclides. Table B-1 of Appendix B presents the gamma
survey readings. This table includes the site name, the gamma reading in µR/hr and any location
information relative to the measurement. Figures 3-2A and 3-2B show the location of the
gamma sites for the west and east areas respectively. Figure 3-2C shows the gamma site
locations for the east area in the mill area. The gamma values are posted on Figures 3-3A, 3-3B
and 3-3C.

Two gamma meters were used to develop the gamma values for the Shootaring site. The first
meter was Ludlum model 19 with a serial number of 34944, which was last calibrated on April
11, 2002. The second meter that was used is a Ludlum model 12S with a serial number 92512
and calibrated on May 28, 2002.

Radiation trained personnel did the ground surface gamma survey over two days to identify any
areas that could have elevated gamma readings. No action was taken to shield the survey meters
from shine caused by known gamma sources, such as, ore pile, mill process equipment, buildings
and tailings depositional area. Survey meter calibrations are noted on the data sheets. Gamma
survey procedure included function checks on the meter before use. The density of the data was
determined based on non-uniformity of the data. For example, when there were rapidly changing
exposure rates with distance, more data were recorded compared to areas where the exposure
rates were uniform over large distances. As a gamma reading was recorded the hand held global
positioning system (GPS) gave a position which was also recorded along with any notable
landmarks. The gamma survey meter was carried at approximately one meter height above the
ground.

Readings taken below the ground surface were only contact measurements for a qualitative
determination only. Readings are used to estimate soil removal depth.

Gamma Reading
Site Name (uR/hr)Location
A1 5
A10 8
A11 7
A12 8
A13 8
A14 6
A15 7
A16 7
A17 7
A18 6 edge of cover
A19 6 divide
A2 6
A20 6 divide
A21 5 Entrada
A22 5 Entrada
A23 6 Entrada
A24 5 1/16 Bench
A25 6 S33/S34 S250 Entrada
A26 6
A27 6 wind blown
A28 6 wind blown
A29 6 wind blown
A3 7
A30 6 wind blown
A31 7 top pipe drain
A32 7 top drain
A33 7 edge rock
A34 7
A35 7 top drain
A36 7
A37 8 top ridge
A38 7
A39 8 top of drain
A4 7
A40 8
A41 8
A42 8 c. of draw
A43 8
A44 7
A45 7 edge of rock
A46 6 Entrada
A47 8 Entrada
A48 7 edge of rock
A49 7
A5 7
A50 8
A51 9 N edge NP10
A52 10
TABLE B-1. GAMMA SURVEY
B - 2
C:\Projects\2005-50\rec plan 12-05\GAMMA SURVEY.pdf
December 2005
Gamma Reading
Site Name (uR/hr)Location
TABLE B-1. GAMMA SURVEY (cont'd.)
A53 9 top drain
A54 10
A55 8 top drain
A56 8
A57 8
A58 9 edge of rock
A59 10 edge of rock
A6 7
A60 10
A61 10
A62 46
A63 88
A64 165
A65 130 S side NP11
A66 30
A67 9
A68 8
A69 8
A7 7 top drain
A70 8 edge of rock
A71 8 Entrada slope break
A72 7 edge of rock
A73 8
A74 9
A75 11 edge of rock
A76 10
A77 9
A78 9 N side WP1
A79 9
A8 7
A80 9 edge of rock
A81 10 edge of rock
A82 10
A83 10
A84 10 S side WP3
A85 12 edge of rock
A86 11 edge of rock
A87 12
A88 11
A89 11
A9 7
A90 11 edge of rock
A91 17 edge of rock
A92 41
A93 110
A94 12
A95 16 edge of rock
B1 14 edge of clay & rock
B - 3
C:\Projects\2005-50\rec plan 12-05\GAMMA SURVEY.pdf
December 2005
Gamma Reading
Site Name (uR/hr)Location
TABLE B-1. GAMMA SURVEY (cont'd.)
B10 12 edge of rock
B11 12 edge of rock
B12 12
B13 12
B14 10 edge of clay
B15 9 toe of road
B16 9 toe of road
B17 10 edge of clay
B18 11
B19 11
B2 32
B20 12
B21 10
B22 15 c. of 3 roads
B23 11
B24 12
B25 12
B26 10 auger C1
B27 8
B28 7 center road
B29 7 center road
B3 14
B30 6 center road
B31 6 center road
B32 6 RM2
B33 7 toe slope
B34 7 RM2R
B35 7 toe slope
B36 6
B37 6
B38 8
B39 9 edge of clay
B4 11 edge of clay
B40 11
B41 11
B42 10 ED4
B43 9 center road
B44 10
B45 8 edge of clay
B46 7
B47 7
B48 7 center road
B49 7 toe slope
B5 9 outlet 6' culvert
B50 8 center road
B51 10 center road
B52 11 center road
B53 8 center road
B - 4
C:\Projects\2005-50\rec plan 12-05\GAMMA SURVEY.pdf
December 2005
Gamma Reading
Site Name (uR/hr)Location
TABLE B-1. GAMMA SURVEY (cont'd.)
B54 10 center road
B55 10 center road
B56 13 center road
B57 11 center road
B58 11 center road
B59 12
B6 9 toe of road
B60 13
B61 15 corner of fence
B62 16 c. of gate
B63 8 fence
B64 10
B65 9
B66 9
B67 9 center road
B68 10 clay
B69 10 clay, some fine sand
B7 10 edge of clay
B70 9 clay and some fine sand
B71 8 clay and some fine sand
B72 8 road
B73 7
B74 7
B75 6 road
B76 7 road
B77 7 road
B78 6
B79 6
B8 12
B80 6
B81 6
B82 7
B83 6
B84 5
B85 6
B86 5
B87 5
B88 6
B89 7
B9 12
B90 7
B91 8
B92 8
B93 7
B94 7
B95 7
B96 6
B97 11 draw
B - 5
C:\Projects\2005-50\rec plan 12-05\GAMMA SURVEY.pdf
December 2005
Gamma Reading
Site Name (uR/hr)Location
TABLE B-1. GAMMA SURVEY (cont'd.)
B98 13 draw
C100 8
C101 7
C20 9 c. gate
C21 9 fence
C22 11 fence
C23 11 fence
C24 10 fence bend
C25 11 fence
C26 11 fence
C27 12 fence corner
C28 10 top slope
C29 8 top slope
C30 11 top slope
C31 10 c. road
C32 8
C33 8 top of slope
C34 7 top of slope
C35 8 top of slope
C36 8 cor. Fence
C37 9 fence
C38 7
C39 7
C40 7
C41 8
C42 7 cor. Fence
C43 10 fence
C44 8 fence
C45 7 cor. Fence
C46 7
C47 7
C48 7
C49 9 cor. Fence
C50 8 fence
C51 8 fence toe
C52 9 fence
C53 11 c. gate
C54 10
C55 11
C56 12
C57 14 old pit
C58 17
C59 14
C60 15
C61 17 toe
C62 32 toe
C63 16
C64 14
B - 6
C:\Projects\2005-50\rec plan 12-05\GAMMA SURVEY.pdf
December 2005
Gamma Reading
Site Name (uR/hr)Location
TABLE B-1. GAMMA SURVEY (cont'd.)
C65 14
C66 24
C67 24
C68 15
C69 14
C70 17
C71 12
C72 12
C73 14
C74 10
C75 8
C76 8
C77 8 cor. shop
C78 10 cor. shop
C79 8
C80 21
C81 28
C82 34 ditch
C83 13
C84 7
C85 7
C86 7
C87 7
C88 9 road
C89 11 concrete
C90 11
C91 7 pond dike
C92 7 pond dike
C93 6 pond dike
C94 7 top slope
C95 7 top slope
C96 6
C97 5
C98 7
C99 7
CV1 110 drill hole
CV2 90 sand cone & drill hole
CV3 105 drill hole
CV4 85 drill hole
CVB2 125 sand cone hole
D1 28 NW CCD & road
D10 12 SE Ammonia Tank 3 ft. from CCD wall
D11 16 SE side CCD
D12 17 S side CCD
D13 18 S side CCD
D14 22 S side CCD
D15 24 S side CCD
D16 25 S side CCD
B - 7
C:\Projects\2005-50\rec plan 12-05\GAMMA SURVEY.pdf
December 2005
Gamma Reading
Site Name (uR/hr)Location
TABLE B-1. GAMMA SURVEY (cont'd.)
D17 25 S side CCD
D18 24 S side CCD
D19 20 SW side CCD
D2 50 N side CCD center line of road
D20 18 W side CCD
D21 25 W side CCD at tailing line
D22 24 W side CCD at tailing line
D23 22 W side CCD
D24 26 SW mill building
D25 40 W side mill building
D26 22 W side mill building
D27 25 W side mill building
D28 17 W side mill building
D29 27 W side mill building
D3 35 N side CCD & road
D30 16 W side mill building
D31 16 NW side of switch gear room (mill building)
D32 19 NW side of generator & road
D33 21 SW side of generator/transformer
D34 19 W side of generator/transformer
D35 14 NW side of generator/transformer (8 ft)
D36 16 W conveyor (10 ft)
D37 18 W conveyor
D38 17 NW conveyor
D4 25 N side CCD & road
D40 12 N side generator/transformer (10 ft from fence)
D41 13 NW side power house
D42 11 N side power house
D43 11 N side power house
D44 11 NE side change dry
D45 12 E side change dry
D46 12 SE side change dry
D47 16 S side change dry & road
D48 23 NE side 600 area (& road), S side power house
D49 23 N side 600 area & road
D5 18 N side CCD & road
D50 16 N side 600 area & road
D51 15 N side 600 area & road & N side switch gear
D52 15 N side switch gear
D53 21 NE side 600 area, 15 ft from building
D54 35 E side 600 area & large door
D55 100 E side 600 area on pump hose (preg tank?)
D56 40 E side SX & large door
D57 40 E side thickener outside (material in sump)
D58 26 NE side outside thickener
D59 30 E side thickener , 6 ft from sump
D6 15 NE CCD & road
D60 20 E side thickener (tanks), 6 ft from sump
B - 8
C:\Projects\2005-50\rec plan 12-05\GAMMA SURVEY.pdf
December 2005
Gamma Reading
Site Name (uR/hr)Location
TABLE B-1. GAMMA SURVEY (cont'd.)
D61 15 SE side tank (thickener), 6 ft from sump
D62 11 NE side shop
D63 11 E side shop
D64 12 SE side shop
D65 8 S side of fence (inside mill yard), 30 ft from east side
D66 8 S side of fence, 30 ft inside
D67 7 S side of fence, 30 ft inside
D68 8 S side of lab air conditioner
D69 9 SE side lab, 5 ft from building
D7 14 NE Ammonia Tank & road
D70 7 E. side lab
D71 8 E. side lab
D72 8 NE side lab
D73 8 N side lab
D74 8 N side lab
D75 9 NW side lab
D76 10 W side lab
D77 9 W side lab
D78 9 W side lab
D79 10 SW side lab
D8 12 NE Ammonia across from Tank
D80 8 S side lab
D81 9 S side lab
D82 9 SW side kerosene tank
D83 8 SW side kerosene tank & inside fence
D84 8 NE side kerosene tank & inside fence & NaChloride tank
D85 9 NW side kerosene tank & NaChloride tank
D86 10 NW side NaChlorate tank
D87 10 NE side NaChlorate tank & fence, 10 ft
D88 12 E side of fence (inside yard) across road from outside thickener
D89 11 E side inside fence
D9 11 SE Ammonia across from Tank
D90 10 E side inside fence
D91 10 E side inside fence, across from pump house
D92 10 E side inside fence, across from water tank
D93 11 E side inside fence, across from water tank road
D94 10 E side inside fence
D95 11 E side fence at guard house
D96 28 3.5' N. Pit old lab
D96 8 - 10
3.5' to 6' check gamma every 6", all red sand, no odor or texture change (sand is a
little damp), contact rock at 7'
D96 8 - 9 check gamma every 6", all red sand, no color change
D97 5 - 8 second old pit, 0 - 4.5' (sidewall)
D97 10 5.5', red sand
D98 8 - 10 1.5' to 2.5 '
D98 16 2.5', red color
D98 60 3.5', red color
D99 8 - 9 0' - 3.5', red sand
B - 9
C:\Projects\2005-50\rec plan 12-05\GAMMA SURVEY.pdf
December 2005
Gamma Reading
Site Name (uR/hr)Location
TABLE B-1. GAMMA SURVEY (cont'd.)
D99 11 3.5', white sand
DD1 7
DD2 8
DD3 7
DD4 12 in pit, gravel @ surface,, 0-1.5' v.f. red sand, some rock
DD5 15 0-1' gravel & red fine sand, 1-1.5' large rocks & cl. Ore
DD6 10 top to bottom, 0-4" rock & red sand, 4"-1.5' red v.f. sand
DD7 (0-6") 16
DD7 (1) 15 0-1' gravel & red sand, 1-1.5' v.f. red sand
DD8 (0-6") 60 tan v.f. sand
DD8 (6-12") 45 clay, rock & sand
DD9 (0-6") 19
DD9 (6-12") 16
E1 12 walk gate
E10 11 NE fuel dike
E11 13
E12 13 fence
E13 24 fence
E14 17
E15 23 toe dike
E16 48
E17 38 NW building
E18 25 Mill Sur. 4
E19 130 near ore
E2 14
E20 34
E21 36 SE side
E22 21
E23 29 NE scale
E24 25 fence cor.
E25 50 fence cor.
E26 34
E27 33 yellow post
E28 28
E29 25
E3 12
E4 9
E5 9 top slope
E6 9 cor building
E7 13 top slope
E8 18
E9 11 SE fuel dike
F1 65 east CVB
F10 12
F11 14
F12 14 sump
F13 10
F14 10
B - 10
C:\Projects\2005-50\rec plan 12-05\GAMMA SURVEY.pdf
December 2005
Gamma Reading
Site Name (uR/hr)Location
TABLE B-1. GAMMA SURVEY (cont'd.)
F15 14
F16 23
F17 22
F18 14
F19 42
F2 24
F20 17
F21 40 west CVB
F22 12 above WSC/CVB
F23 9
F24 8
F25 11
F26 8
F27 9
F28 8
F29 8
F3 30
F30 8
F31 8
F32 8
F33 9 RM7
F34 9
F35 9
F36 10
F37 9
F38 10
F39 8
F4 18
F40 9
F41 10
F42 8
F43 9
F44 12
F45 8
F46 7.5
F47 9
F48 10
F49 10
F5 34
F50 8
F51 9
F52 14
F53 12 East CB
F54 8 East Road
F55 8
F56 8
F57 8
F58 7
B - 11
C:\Projects\2005-50\rec plan 12-05\GAMMA SURVEY.pdf
December 2005
Gamma Reading
Site Name (uR/hr)Location
TABLE B-1. GAMMA SURVEY (cont'd.)
F59 7 road
F6 12
F60 10
F61 8
F62 8
F63 7
F64 8
F65 8
F66 8
F67 8
F68 8
F69 7
F7 32
F70 7
F71 8 rock pile
F72 9
F73 8
F74 7
F75 7
F76 6
F77 7
F78 7
F79 8
F8 13
F80 7
F81 6
F82 5
F83 6
F84 10
F85 6
F86 7
F87 6
F88 7
F89 7
F9 14
F90 6
F91 6 SS
F92 6
F93 10
F94 7
F95 7
F96 6
F97 6
F98 6 SS
F99 6 above SS
G1 6
G10 7 draw
G100 19
B - 12
C:\Projects\2005-50\rec plan 12-05\GAMMA SURVEY.pdf
December 2005
Gamma Reading
Site Name (uR/hr)Location
TABLE B-1. GAMMA SURVEY (cont'd.)
G101 20
G102 11
G103 9
G104 10
G105 19 edge of white depot
G106 18
G107 24
G108 25
G109 16
G11 8 draw
G110 16
G111 17
G112 15
G113 18
G12 8 draw
G13 7 draw
G14 8 split in draw
G15 8 draw
G16 8 draw
G17 8 draw
G18 8 draw
G19 8 draw
G2 6
G20 9 draw
G21 9 draw
G22 10 upst. draw
G23 7 E. 1/16 33 draw
G24 8 draw
G25 8 draw
G26 8 draw
G27 7 draw
G28 7 draw
G29 7 edge draw SS
G3 7
G30 8 draw
G31 7 draw
G32 7 draw SS
G33 7 road
G34 7
G35 8
G36 7 road
G37 7 road
G38 7 road
G39 7
G4 8
G40 7 road
G41 8
G42 7
B - 13
C:\Projects\2005-50\rec plan 12-05\GAMMA SURVEY.pdf
December 2005
Gamma Reading
Site Name (uR/hr)Location
TABLE B-1. GAMMA SURVEY (cont'd.)
G43 7 road and draw
G44 7
G45 8 road and draw
G46 8 road and draw
G47 9 draw
G48 9 RM8
G49 9 draw
G5 7
G50 12 draw
G51 12 draw
G52 9 5' top SS
G53 10 draw
G54 16 draw
G55 23 draw
G56 12 draw
G57 10 5' above
G58 11 5' above
G59 18 draw
G6 7 Entrada
G60 36 draw
G61 12 1.5' head cut
G62 15
G63 11 edge
G64 9 5' above
G65 8 10' above
G66 16 draw
G67 13 c. draw
G68 30 draw
G69 17 edge
G7 9 c. channel
G70 11 10' above
G71 16 edge
G72 13 edge
G73 14 draw
G74 19
G75 12
G76 10 top slope
G77 9
G78 9 top slope
G79 12 bot. Slope
G8 8 edge SS
G80 11
G81 8 top slope
G82 8 bot. slope
G83 7 bot. slope
G84 8
G85 8
G86 8 power switch
B - 14
C:\Projects\2005-50\rec plan 12-05\GAMMA SURVEY.pdf
December 2005
Gamma Reading
Site Name (uR/hr)Location
TABLE B-1. GAMMA SURVEY (cont'd.)
G87 8 top slope
G88 10 top point
G89 8 bot. slope
G9 7 edge SS
G90 8 bot. slope
G91 11
G92 10
G93 10
G94 14
G95 13
G96 13
G97 9 top slope
G98 14
G99 18
H1 18
H10 9
H100 42 0-3" sample
H101 (0-6") 31 0-6"
H101 (6-12") 22 6-12"
H102 24 1'-1.5' below rock
H11 7
H12 8 5' above
H13 7 draw
H14 7 draw
H15 7 draw
H16 7 draw
H17 7 draw
H18 7 draw
H19 7 top slope
H2 15 end of pipe
H20 7
H21 8 draw
H22 7 draw
H23 8 draw
H24 8 draw
H25 9 draw
H26 10 draw
H27 10 draw
H28 12
H29 15 toe 4' pile
H3 15
H30 18 toe 4' pile
H31 15 toe 4' pile
H32 16 toe 4' pile
H33 18 toe 4' pile
H34 22 toe 4' pile
H35 16
H36 18
B - 15
C:\Projects\2005-50\rec plan 12-05\GAMMA SURVEY.pdf
December 2005
Gamma Reading
Site Name (uR/hr)Location
TABLE B-1. GAMMA SURVEY (cont'd.)
H37 18
H38 12 top w sand cover
H39 15
H4 15
H40 10
H41 10 toe 20' pile
H42 10 toe 20' pile
H43 8 toe 20' pile in SS
H44 7 top SS
H45 9
H46 8 start toe dam w. bt.
H47 9
H48 12
H49 14
H5 14
H50 (1) 20 start of deposit 20 in.
H50 (2) 15 5' above a rock
H51 25
H52 (1) 28
H52 (2) 18 5' above sol. to 4'
H53 30
H54 16 rock
H55 11 RM9
H56 22 rock edge
H57 23
H58 19 last sign of acid
H59 12
H6 13
H60 9
H61 (1) 8 edge of large and small rock
H61(2) 8 top edge f. rock
H62 8 top edge f. rock
H63 8 e. edge small rock
H64 8
H65 8
H66 8
H67 8 rock sample
H68 8 rock sample
H69 8 rock sample
H7 13 5' pile
H70 7
H71 8 PZ
H72 7 dust NE cor.
H73 8 dust
H74 7 dust
H75 8 P2
H76 9 upst. Removed H7
H77 8 upst. Removed H7
B - 16
C:\Projects\2005-50\rec plan 12-05\GAMMA SURVEY.pdf
December 2005
Gamma Reading
Site Name (uR/hr)Location
TABLE B-1. GAMMA SURVEY (cont'd.)
H78 8 PZ
H79 8 closest rock M1
H8 21
H80 8 NW cor. dust
H81 8 SW cor. upst
H82 8 RM
H83 8 RM
H84 8 dust
H85 9 dust
H86 8 dust
H87 7 dust
H88 7 dust
H89 7 dust
H9 10
H90 7 dust
H91 8 SE cor. Dust
H92 7 RM
H93 7 RM
H94 7 PZ
H95 9 sump
H96 7 PZ4
H97 7 draw
H98 7 draw
H99 (0-6") 12 0-6" sample
H99 (6-12") 17 6-12" sample
I1 12 S.W. Office
I10 12
I11 16
I12 11
I13 24
I14 8
I15 8
I16 8
I17 12 center of road
I18 9 l. of road
I19 9
I2 20
I20 8
I21 9
I22 9
I23 10 fence
I24 12
I25 8
I26 8
I27 10
I28 10
I29 11
I3 15
B - 17
C:\Projects\2005-50\rec plan 12-05\GAMMA SURVEY.pdf
December 2005
Gamma Reading
Site Name (uR/hr)Location
TABLE B-1. GAMMA SURVEY (cont'd.)
I30 12
I31 10
I32 12
I33 11
I34 9 weather stat.
I35 10
I36 12
I37 9
I38 9
I39 10
I4 15
I40 10
I41 12
I42 11
I43 11
I44 12
I45 10
I46 10
I47 11
I48 11
I49 26
I5 14
I50 14
I51 8
I52 8
I53 7
I54 8
I55 7
I56 7
I57 6
I58 6
I59 6
I6 15
I60 7
I61 6
I62 6
I63 6
I64 6
I65 6
I66 6
I67 7
I68 14
I69 12
I7 16
I70 13 light pole
I8 13
I9 15
NC1 (1) 90 0-6" sample
B - 18
C:\Projects\2005-50\rec plan 12-05\GAMMA SURVEY.pdf
December 2005
Gamma Reading
Site Name (uR/hr)Location
TABLE B-1. GAMMA SURVEY (cont'd.)
NC1 (2) 90 6-12"
NC2 20
NC3 20
NC4 20
NC5 20
NC6 20
OP2 (3.7-4.2') 280
OP2 (4.2-4.6') 170
OP2 (ore) 650
OP3 (1.3-2.9') 600 0-1.3' red v.f. sand, 1.3-2.9' gray sand ore
OP3 (2.9-3.4') 250 tan fine sand, some rock
OP3 (3.4-3.9') 160 red v.f. sand
B - 19
C:\Projects\2005-50\rec plan 12-05\GAMMA SURVEY.pdf
December 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005

ATTACHMENT C

TABLE OF CONTENTS

C.1 Permeability Atterberg Limits, Gradation and Moisture-Density for the Alternate Clay
Source by Inberg-MillerEngineers, September20,2005, (6 pages)

C.2 Discussion of Alternate Source Clay Properties by Inberg-MillerEngineers,
September20, 2005, (1 page)

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdf
December 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix C.pdfDecember 2005

APPENDIX C.2.1
LOGS OF BORINGS AND TEST PITS
HYDRO-ENGINEERING 2002 FIELD INVESTIGATION
(HYDRO-ENGINEERING, 2005B)

APPENDIX C.2.2
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
HYDRO-ENGINEERING 2002 FIELD INVESTIGATION
(HYDRO-ENGINEERING, 2005B)

APPENDIX C.2.3
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
HYDRO-ENGINEERING 2005 ANALYSES
(HYDRO-ENGINEERING, 2005A)

APPENDIX C.3
TETRA TECH FIELD INVESTIGATION (2008)

APPENDIX C.3.1
TETRA TECH FIELD INVESTIGATION
MARCH 10-11, 2008
BOREHOLE LOGS

APPENDIX C.3.2
TETRA TECH FIELD INVESTIGATION
MARCH 17-19, 2008
TEST PIT LOGS

APPENDIX C.3.3
TETRA TECH AUGUST 15-16, SEPTEMBER 3, 2008 TEST PIT LOGS

APPENDIX C.3.4
TETRA TECH FIELD INVESTIGATION LABORATORY TESTING
RESULTS

APPENDIX C.3.4.1
CAPSTONE ENTERPRISES WEST, LLC
LABORATORY TESTING RESULTS
Re
p
o
r
t

o
f

G
e
o
t
e
c
h
n
i
c
a
l

L
a
b
o
r
a
t
o
r
y

T
e
s
t
i
n
g

Ur
a
n
i
u
m

O
n
e

Sh
o
o
t
a
r
i
n
g

C
a
n
y
o
n

B
o
r
r
o
w

M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s

I
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n

Te
t
r
a

T
e
c
h

0102030405060708090
Jm
b

R
e
d
-
1
Jm
b

R
e
d
-
2
Jm
b

G
r
e
e
n
-
1
Jm
b

G
r
e
e
n
-
2
Jm
b

G
r
e
e
n
-
3
Tt
-
T
P

1
8
0

1
0

2
0

3
0

4
0

5
0

6
0

7
0

8
0

9
0

1
0
0

1
1
0

1
2
0
Li
q
u
i
d

L
i
m
i
t
,

L
L

(
%
)
Plasticity Index, PI (%)
A-
L
i
n
e
ML

o
r

O
L
MH

o
r

O
H
CH

o
r

O
H
U-
L
i
n
e
7 4
CL

o
r

O
L
CL

-

M
L

Pl
a
s
t
i
c
i
t
y

C
h
a
r
t

f
o
r
Sa
m
p
l
e
s

T
e
s
t
e
d

b
y

C
a
p
s
t
o
n
e

E
n
t
e
r
p
r
i
s
e
s

W
e
s
t

APPENDIX C.3.4.2
TETRA TECH
LABORATORY TESTING RESULTS

APPENDIX D
SELECTED APPENDICES FROM HYDRO-ENGINEERING (2005b)
REGARDING CONTAMINATED SOIL CLEANUP

APPENDIX D.1
APPENDIX M, RADIATION SURVEY QUALITY ASSURANCE
PROJECT PLAN (HYDRO-ENGINEERING, 2005b)

APPENDIX D.2
APPENDIX E, DERIVATION OF SOIL CLEANUP CRITERIA
(HYDRO-ENGINEERING, 2005b)

APPENDIX D.3
APPENDIX F, NATURAL BACKGROUND CONCENTRATIONS OF
RADIONUCLIDES IN SOIL (HYDRO-ENGINEERING, 2005b)

APPENDIX E
RESULTS OF SEEPAGE AND SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES

APPENDIX E.1
TAILINGS STORAGE FACILITY
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Side Slope
End of Construction
Steady State Seepage Analysis
Figure E.1-1
-8000
-6000
-4000
-2000
0
File Name: West Berm - Side Slopes HT FINAL Seep.gsz
Side Slope
End of Construction
Steady State Seepage Analysis
(1)
(2)
(3)
(1) Sand Fill k = .01 cm/s
(2) Bedrock (Entrada Sandstone) k = .01 cm/s
(3) Compacted Clay Liner (CCL) k = 1 e -7 cm/s
Distance (x 1000)
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.20
4.22
4.24
4.26
4.28
4.30
4.32
4.34
4.36
4.38
4.40
4.42
4.44
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Side Slope
End of Construction
Static Analysis
Figure E.1-2
1.6
Tailings Elevation - Elevation 4422.5 ft
Side Slope
End of Construction
(1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0, phi = 32 deg
(2) Entrada Sandstone unit wt = 140 pcf, c = 1000, phi = 45 deg
(3) Clay Layer unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 27 deg
(4) Tailings unit wt = 100 pcf, c = 0, phi = 10 deg
(1)
(2)
(3)
Distance, ft (x 1000)
0.000 0.050 0.100 0.150 0.200 0.250 0.300 0.350 0.400 0.450 0.500 0.550 0.600 0.650 0.700 0.750
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.100
4.125
4.150
4.175
4.200
4.225
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
4.425
4.450
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Side Slope
End of Construction
Pseudostatic Analysis
Figure E.1-3
1.2
Tailings Elevation - Elevation 4422.5 ft
Pseudostatic (0.12g)Side Slope
End of Construction
(1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0, phi = 32 deg
(2) Entrada Sandstone unit wt = 140 pcf, c = 1000, phi = 45 deg
(3) Clay Layer unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 27 deg
(4) Tailings unit wt = 100 pcf, c = 0, phi = 10 deg
(1)
(2)
(3)
Distance, ft (x 1000)
0.000 0.050 0.100 0.150 0.200 0.250 0.300 0.350 0.400 0.450 0.500 0.550 0.600 0.650 0.700 0.750
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.100
4.125
4.150
4.175
4.200
4.225
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
4.425
4.450
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Side Slope
End of Construction
Live Load Analysis – 34 kip Axle Load
Figure E.1-4
1.6
Tailings Elevation - Elevation 4422.5 ft
Side Slope
End of Construction
(1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0, phi = 32 deg
(2) Entrada Sandstone unit wt = 140 pcf, c = 1000, phi = 45 deg
(3) Clay Layer unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 27 deg
(4) Tailings unit wt = 100 pcf, c = 0, phi = 10 deg
Live Load Analysis (34k Axel Load)
(1)
(2)
(3)
Distance, ft (x 1000)
0.000 0.050 0.100 0.150 0.200 0.250 0.300 0.350 0.400 0.450 0.500 0.550 0.600 0.650 0.700 0.750
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.100
4.125
4.150
4.175
4.200
4.225
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
4.425
4.450
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Side Slope
End of Construction
Live Load Analysis – Vibratory Compactor on Back of Slope
Figure E.1-5
1.6
Tailings Elevation - Elevation 4422.5 ft
(1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0, phi = 32 deg
(2) Entrada Sandstone unit wt = 140 pcf, c = 1000, phi = 45 deg
(3) Clay Layer unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 27 deg
(4) Tailings unit wt = 100 pcf, c = 0, phi = 10 deg
Live Load Analysis
Vibratory Compactor
2,065 psf (weight at drum)
Caterpillar CS76XT or similar
(1)
(2)
(3)
Side Slope
End of Construction
Distance, ft (x 1000)
0.000 0.050 0.100 0.150 0.200 0.250 0.300 0.350 0.400 0.450 0.500 0.550 0.600 0.650 0.700 0.750
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.100
4.125
4.150
4.175
4.200
4.225
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
4.425
4.450
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Side Slope
End of Construction
Live Load Analysis – Vibratory Compactor on Front of Slope
Figure E.1-6
1.3
Tailings Elevation - Elevation 4422.5 ft
(1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0, phi = 32 deg
(2) Entrada Sandstone unit wt = 140 pcf, c = 1000, phi = 45 deg
(3) Clay Layer unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 27 deg
(4) Tailings unit wt = 100 pcf, c = 0, phi = 10 deg
(1)
(2)
(3)
Side Slope
End of Construction
Live Load Analysis
Vibratory Compactor
2,065 psf (weight at drum)
Caterpillar CS76XT or similar
Distance, ft (x 1000)
0.000 0.050 0.100 0.150 0.200 0.250 0.300 0.350 0.400 0.450 0.500 0.550 0.600 0.650 0.700 0.750
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.100
4.125
4.150
4.175
4.200
4.225
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
4.425
4.450
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Side Slope
End of Tailings Deposition
Steady State Seepage Analysis
Figure E.1-7
-8 0 0 0 -6000 -4 0 0 0
-2000
0
File Name: West Berm - Side Slopes HT FINAL Seep.gsz
Side Slope
Seepage Analysis
End of Tailings Deposition
(1)
(2)
(3)
(1) Sand Fill k = .01 cm/s
(2) Bedrock (Entrada Sandstone) k = .01 cm/s
(3) Prepared Foundation (Natural Sands) k = .01 cm/s
(4) Compacted Clay Liner (CCL) k = 1 e -7 cm/s
Distance (x 1000)
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.20
4.22
4.24
4.26
4.28
4.30
4.32
4.34
4.36
4.38
4.40
4.42
4.44
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Side Slope
End of Tailings Deposition
Static Analysis
Figure E.1-8
2.3
Tailings Elevation - Elevation 4422.5 ft
Side Slope
End of Tailings Deposition
(1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0, phi = 32 deg
(2) Entrada Sandstone unit wt = 140 pcf, c = 1000, phi = 45 deg
(3) Clay Layer unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 27 deg
(4) Tailings unit wt = 100 pcf, c = 0, phi = 10 deg
(4)
(1)
(2)
(3)
Distance, ft (x 1000)
0.000 0.050 0.100 0.150 0.200 0.250 0.300 0.350 0.400 0.450 0.500 0.550 0.600 0.650 0.700 0.750
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.100
4.125
4.150
4.175
4.200
4.225
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
4.425
4.450
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Side Slope
End of Tailings Deposition
Pseudostatic Analysis
Figure E.1-9
1.3
Tailings Elevation - Elevation 4422.5 ft
Pseudostatic Analysis (0.12g)
(1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0, phi = 32 deg
(2) Entrada Sandstone unit wt = 140 pcf, c = 1000, phi = 45 deg
(3) Clay Layer unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 27 deg
(4) Tailings unit wt = 100 pcf, c = 0, phi = 10 deg
Side Slope
End of Tailings Deposition
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Distance, ft (x 1000)
0.000 0.050 0.100 0.150 0.200 0.250 0.300 0.350 0.400 0.450 0.500 0.550 0.600 0.650 0.700 0.750
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.100
4.125
4.150
4.175
4.200
4.225
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
4.425
4.450
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Side Slope
End of Tailings Deposition
Live Load Analysis – 34 kip Axle Load
Figure E.1-10
2.0
Tailings Elevation - Elevation 4422.5 ft
Live Load Analysis (34k Axel Load)
(1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0, phi = 32 deg
(2) Entrada Sandstone unit wt = 140 pcf, c = 1000, phi = 45 deg
(3) Clay Layer unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 27 deg
(4) Tailings unit wt = 100 pcf, c = 0, phi = 10 deg
Side Slope
End of Construction
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Distance, ft (x 1000)
0.000 0.050 0.100 0.150 0.200 0.250 0.300 0.350 0.400 0.450 0.500 0.550 0.600 0.650 0.700 0.750
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.100
4.125
4.150
4.175
4.200
4.225
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
4.425
4.450
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
South Dam
End of Construction
Steady State Seepage Analysis
Figure E.1-11
-7500
-6000
-4500
-2500
-1500
0
2
4 4
1
3
2 3
6
5
6
8
Crest Elev. = 4,430 ft
File Name: South Embankment Taillings Final HT.gsz
Date: 11/20/2008
Tailings at Elevation 4422.5'
South Embankment
End of Construction
(1) Core (silty, sandy clay) k = 5e-7 cm/s
(2) Shell (boulders, cobbles, gravels, & sands) k = 0.1 cm/s
(3)Filter (select fine sand) k = 0.77 cm/s
(4) Prepared Foundation (Entrada sandstone) k = 0.01 cm/s
(5) Compacted Clay Blanket (silty, sandy clay) k = 1e-7 cm/s
(6) Gravel Drain: k = 36.5 cm/s
Distance, ft
-300 -275 -250 -225 -200 -175 -150 -125 -100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.100
4.125
4.150
4.175
4.200
4.225
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
4.425
4.450
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
South Dam
End of Construction
Upstream Static Analysis
Figure E.1-12
1.7
2
4 4
(1) Core (silty, sandy clay) unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 27 deg
(2) Shell (boulders, cobbles, gravels, & sands) unit wt. = 131 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 40 deg
(3)Filter (select fine sand (unit wt. = 125 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 30 deg
(4) Prepared Foundation (Entrada sandstone) unit wt. = 140 pcf, cohesion = 1000 psf, phi = 45 deg
(5) Compacted Clay Blanket (silty, sandy clay) unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion 50 psf, phi = 27 deg
(6) Gravel Drain: unit wt. = 130 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 35 deg
1
3
2 3
6
5
6
8
Crest Elev. = 4,430 ft
File Name: South Embankment Taillings Final HT.gsz
Date: 10/22/2008
Tailings at Elevation 4422.5'
South Embankment
End of Construction
Distance, ft
-300 -275 -250 -225 -200 -175 -150 -125 -100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.100
4.125
4.150
4.175
4.200
4.225
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
4.425
4.450
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
South Dam
End of Construction
Upstream Pseudostatic Analysis
Figure E.1-13
1.3
2
4 4
1
3
2 3
6
5
6
8
Crest Elev. = 4,430 ft
File Name: South Embankment Taillings Final HT.gsz
Date: 10/22/2008
Tailings at Elevation 4422.5'
South Embankment
End of Construction
(1) Core (silty, sandy clay) unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 27 deg
(2) Shell (boulders, cobbles, gravels, & sands) unit wt. = 131 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 40 deg
(3)Filter (select fine sand (unit wt. = 125 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 30 deg
(4) Prepared Foundation (Entrada sandstone) unit wt. = 140 pcf, cohesion = 1000 psf, phi = 45 deg
(5) Compacted Clay Blanket (silty, sandy clay) unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion 50 psf, phi = 27 deg
(6) Gravel Drain: unit wt. = 130 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 35 deg
Pseudostatic Analysis (0.12g)
Distance, ft
-300 -275 -250 -225 -200 -175 -150 -125 -100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.100
4.125
4.150
4.175
4.200
4.225
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
4.425
4.450
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
South Dam
End of Tailings Construction
Upstream Analysis with Live Loads
Figure E.1-14
1.7
2
4 4
1
3
2 3
6
5
6
8
Crest Elev. = 4,430 ft
File Name: South Embankment Taillings Final HT.gsz
Date: 10/22/2008
Tailings at Elevation 4422.5'
(1) Core (silty, sandy clay) unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 27 deg
(2) Shell (boulders, cobbles, gravels, & sands) unit wt. = 131 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 40 deg
(3)Filter (select fine sand (unit wt. = 125 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 30 deg
(4) Prepared Foundation (Entrada sandstone) unit wt. = 140 pcf, cohesion = 1000 psf, phi = 45 deg
(5) Compacted Clay Blanket (silty, sandy clay) unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion 50 psf, phi = 27 deg
(6) Gravel Drain: unit wt. = 130 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 35 deg
South Embankment
End of Construction Live Load Analysis (34k Axel Load)
Distance, ft
-300 -275 -250 -225 -200 -175 -150 -125 -100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.100
4.125
4.150
4.175
4.200
4.225
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
4.425
4.450
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
South Dam
End of Tailings Construction
Downstream Static Analysis
Figure E.1-15
1.7
2
4 4
1
3
2 3
6
5
6
8
Crest Elev. = 4,430 ft
File Name: South Embankment Taillings Final HT.gsz
Date: 10/22/2008
Tailings at Elevation 4422.5'
South Embankment
End of Construction
(1) Core (silty, sandy clay) unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 27 deg
(2) Shell (boulders, cobbles, gravels, & sands) unit wt. = 131 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 40 deg
(3)Filter (select fine sand (unit wt. = 125 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 30 deg
(4) Prepared Foundation (Entrada sandstone) unit wt. = 140 pcf, cohesion = 1000 psf, phi = 45 deg
(5) Compacted Clay Blanket (silty, sandy clay) unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion 50 psf, phi = 27 deg
(6) Gravel Drain: unit wt. = 130 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 35 deg
Distance, ft
-300 -275 -250 -225 -200 -175 -150 -125 -100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.100
4.125
4.150
4.175
4.200
4.225
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
4.425
4.450
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
South Dam
End of Tailings Construction
Downstream Pseudostatic Analysis
Figure E.1-16
1.3
2
4 4
1
Pseudostatic Analysis (0.12g)
3
2 3
6
5
6
8
Crest Elev. = 4,430 ft
File Name: South Embankment Taillings Final HT.gsz
Date: 10/22/2008
Tailings at Elevation 4422.5'
South Embankment
End of Construction
(1) Core (silty, sandy clay) unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 27 deg
(2) Shell (boulders, cobbles, gravels, & sands) unit wt. = 131 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 40 deg
(3)Filter (select fine sand (unit wt. = 125 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 30 deg
(4) Prepared Foundation (Entrada sandstone) unit wt. = 140 pcf, cohesion = 1000 psf, phi = 45 deg
(5) Compacted Clay Blanket (silty, sandy clay) unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion 50 psf, phi = 27 deg
(6) Gravel Drain: unit wt. = 130 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 35 deg
Distance, ft
-300 -275 -250 -225 -200 -175 -150 -125 -100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.100
4.125
4.150
4.175
4.200
4.225
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
4.425
4.450
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
South Dam
End of Tailings Deposition
Steady State Seepage Analysis
Figure E.1-17
-8000
-2000 -2000
2
4 4
1
3
2 3
6
5
6
8
Crest Elev. = 4,430 ft
File Name: South Embankment Taillings Final HT.gsz
Date: 11/20/2008
South Embankment
End of Tailings Deposition
Tailings at Elevation 4422.5'
(1) Core (silty, sandy clay) k = 5e-7 cm/s
(2) Shell (boulders, cobbles, gravels, & sands) k = 0.1 cm/s
(3) Filter (select fine sand) k = 0.77 cm/s
(4) Prepared Foundation (Entrada sandstone) k = 0.01 cm/s
(5) Compacted Clay Blanket (silty, sandy clay) k = 1e-7 cm/s
(6) Gravel Drain: k = 36.5 cm/s
(7) Tailings k = 5e-5 cm/s
Distance, ft
-300 -275 -250 -225 -200 -175 -150 -125 -100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.100
4.125
4.150
4.175
4.200
4.225
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
4.425
4.450
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
South Dam
End of Tailings Deposition
Upstream Static Analysis
Figure E.1-18
1.8
South Embankment
End of Tailings Deposition
2
4 4
1
3
2 3
6
5
6
8
Crest Elev. = 4,430 ft
File Name: South Embankment Taillings Final HT.gsz
Date: 10/22/2008
Tailings at Elevation 4422.5'
(1) Core (silty, sandy clay) unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 27 deg
(2) Shell (boulders, cobbles, gravels, & sands) unit wt. = 131 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 40 deg
(3)Filter (select fine sand (unit wt. = 125 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 30 deg
(4) Prepared Foundation (Entrada sandstone) unit wt. = 140 pcf, cohesion = 1000 psf, phi = 45 deg
(5) Compacted Clay Blanket (silty, sandy clay) unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion 50 psf, phi = 27 deg
(6) Gravel Drain: unit wt. = 130 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 35 deg
Distance, ft
-300 -275 -250 -225 -200 -175 -150 -125 -100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.100
4.125
4.150
4.175
4.200
4.225
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
4.425
4.450
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
South Dam
End of Tailings Deposition
Upstream Pseudostatic Analysis
Figure E.1-19
1.3
2
4 4
1
3
2 3
6
5
6
8
Pseudostatic Analysis (0.12g)
South Embankment
End of Tailings Deposition
Crest Elev. = 4,430 ft
File Name: South Embankment Taillings Final HT.gsz
Date: 10/22/2008
Tailings at Elevation 4422.5'
(1) Core (silty, sandy clay) unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 27 deg
(2) Shell (boulders, cobbles, gravels, & sands) unit wt. = 131 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 40 deg
(3)Filter (select fine sand (unit wt. = 125 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 30 deg
(4) Prepared Foundation (Entrada sandstone) unit wt. = 140 pcf, cohesion = 1000 psf, phi = 45 deg
(5) Compacted Clay Blanket (silty, sandy clay) unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion 50 psf, phi = 27 deg
(6) Gravel Drain: unit wt. = 130 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 35 deg
Distance, ft
-300 -275 -250 -225 -200 -175 -150 -125 -100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.100
4.125
4.150
4.175
4.200
4.225
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
4.425
4.450
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
South Dam
End of Tailings Deposition
Upstream Analysis with Live Loads
Figure E.1-20
1.8
2
4 4
1
3
2 3
6
5
6
8
Crest Elev. = 4,430 ft
File Name: South Embankment Taillings Final HT.gsz
Date: 10/22/2008
Tailings at Elevation 4422.5'
South Embankment
End of Tailings Deposition
(1) Core (silty, sandy clay) unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 27 deg
(2) Shell (boulders, cobbles, gravels, & sands) unit wt. = 131 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 40 deg
(3)Filter (select fine sand (unit wt. = 125 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 30 deg
(4) Prepared Foundation (Entrada sandstone) unit wt. = 140 pcf, cohesion = 1000 psf, phi = 45 deg
(5) Compacted Clay Blanket (silty, sandy clay) unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion 50 psf, phi = 27 deg
(6) Gravel Drain: unit wt. = 130 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 35 deg
Live Load Analysis (34k Axel Load)
Distance, ft
-300 -275 -250 -225 -200 -175 -150 -125 -100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.100
4.125
4.150
4.175
4.200
4.225
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
4.425
4.450
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
South Dam
End of Tailings Deposition
Downstream Static Analysis
Figure E.1-21
1.7
2
4 4
1
3
2 3
6
5
6
8
South Embankment
End of Tailings Deposition
Crest Elev. = 4,430 ft
File Name: South Embankment Taillings Final HT.gsz
Date: 10/22/2008
Tailings at Elevation 4422.5'
(1) Core (silty, sandy clay) unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 27 deg
(2) Shell (boulders, cobbles, gravels, & sands) unit wt. = 131 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 40 deg
(3)Filter (select fine sand (unit wt. = 125 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 30 deg
(4) Prepared Foundation (Entrada sandstone) unit wt. = 140 pcf, cohesion = 1000 psf, phi = 45 deg
(5) Compacted Clay Blanket (silty, sandy clay) unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion 50 psf, phi = 27 deg
(6) Gravel Drain: unit wt. = 130 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 35 deg
Distance, ft
-300 -275 -250 -225 -200 -175 -150 -125 -100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.100
4.125
4.150
4.175
4.200
4.225
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
4.425
4.450
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
South Dam
End of Tailings Deposition
Downstream Pseudostatic Analysis
Figure E.1-22
1.3
2
4 4
1
3
2 3
6
5
6
8
South Embankment
End of Tailings Deposition
Pseudostatic Analysis (0.12g)
Crest Elev. = 4,430 ft
File Name: South Embankment Taillings Final HT.gsz
Date: 10/22/2008
Tailings at Elevation 4422.5'
(1) Core (silty, sandy clay) unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 27 deg
(2) Shell (boulders, cobbles, gravels, & sands) unit wt. = 131 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 40 deg
(3)Filter (select fine sand (unit wt. = 125 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 30 deg
(4) Prepared Foundation (Entrada sandstone) unit wt. = 140 pcf, cohesion = 1000 psf, phi = 45 deg
(5) Compacted Clay Blanket (silty, sandy clay) unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion 50 psf, phi = 27 deg
(6) Gravel Drain: unit wt. = 130 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 35 deg
Distance, ft
-300 -275 -250 -225 -200 -175 -150 -125 -100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.100
4.125
4.150
4.175
4.200
4.225
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
4.425
4.450
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Divider Berm
End of Construction
Steady State Seepage Analysis
Figure E.1-23
-7500
-6500
-5500
-4500
-3500
-2500
-1500
-500
Tailings Elev. 4422.5 ft.
(1)
(2)(3)
File Name: Divider Berm Final HT ck.gsz
Date: 11/18/2008
Divider Berm
(1) Entrada sandstone k = 0.01 cm/s
(2) Sand Fill k = 0.01 cm/s
(3) Clay Layer k = 1e-7 cm/s
End of Construction
Seepage Analysis
Distance, ft
300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.150
4.175
4.200
4.225
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Divider Berm
End of Construction
South Face Static Analysis
Figure E.1-24
1.6
Tailings Elev. 4422.5 ft.
(1)
(2)(3)
(1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0, phi = 32 deg
(2) Entrada Sandstone unit wt = 140 pcf, c = 1000, phi = 45 deg
(3) Clay Layer unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 50 psf, phi = 27 deg
File Name: Divider Berm Final HT.gsz
Date: 10/22/2008
Divider Berm
End of Construction
Distance, ft
300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Divider Berm
End of Construction
South Face Pseudostatic Analysis
Figure E.1-25
1.2
Tailings Elev. 4422.5 ft.
(1)
(2)(3)
(1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0, phi = 32 deg
(2) Entrada Sandstone unit wt = 140 pcf, c = 1000, phi = 45 deg
(3) Clay Layer unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 50 psf, phi = 27 deg
File Name: Divider Berm Final HT.gsz
Date: 10/22/2008
Divider Berm Pseudostatic Analysis (0.12g)
End of Construction
Distance, ft
300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Divider Berm
End of Construction
South Face Live Load Analysis – 34 kip Axle Load
Figure E.1-26
1.3
Tailings Elev. 4422.5 ft.
(1)
(2)(3)
(1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0, phi = 32 deg
(2) Entrada Sandstone unit wt = 140 pcf, c = 1000, phi = 45 deg
(3) Clay Layer unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 50 psf, phi = 27 deg
File Name: Divider Berm Final HT.gsz
Date: 10/27/2008
Divider Berm Live Load Analysis (34 kip Axle Load)
End of Construction
Distance, ft
300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Divider Berm
End of Construction
Live Load Analysis South Face – Vibratory Compactor on Back of Slope
Figure E.1-27
1.6
Tailings Elev. 4422.5 ft.
(1)
(2)(3)
File Name: Divider Berm Final HT.gsz
Date: 10/27/2008
Divider Berm
(1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0, phi = 32 deg
(2) Entrada Sandstone unit wt = 140 pcf, c = 1000, phi = 45 deg
(3) Clay Layer unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 50 psf, phi = 27 deg
End of Construction
Live Load Analysis
Vibratory Compactor
2,065 psf (weight at drum)
Caterpillar CS76XT or similar
Distance, ft
300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Divider Berm
End of Construction
Live Load Analysis South Face – Vibratory Compactor on Front of Slope
Figure E.1-28
1.2
Tailings Elev. 4422.5 ft.
(1)
(2)(3)
File Name: Divider Berm Final HT.gsz
Date: 10/27/2008
Divider Berm
(1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0, phi = 32 deg
(2) Entrada Sandstone unit wt = 140 pcf, c = 1000, phi = 45 deg
(3) Clay Layer unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 50 psf, phi = 27 deg
End of Construction
Live Load Analysis
Vibratory Compactor
2,065 psf (weight at drum)
Caterpillar CS76XT or similar
Distance, ft
300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Divider Berm
End of Construction
North Face Static Analysis
Figure E.1-29
1.6
Tailings Elev. 4422.5 ft.
(1)
(2)(3)
File Name: Divider Berm Final HT.gsz
Date: 10/22/2008
Divider Berm
End of Construction
(1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0, phi = 32 deg
(2) Entrada Sandstone unit wt = 140 pcf, c = 1000, phi = 45 deg
(3) Clay Layer unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 50 psf, phi = 27 deg
Distance, ft
300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Divider Berm
End of Construction
North Face Pseudostatic Analysis
Figure E.1-30
1.2
Tailings Elev. 4422.5 ft.
(1)
(2)(3)
File Name: Divider Berm Final HT.gsz
Date: 10/22/2008
Divider Berm Pseudostatic (0.12g)
End of Construction
(1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0, phi = 32 deg
(2) Entrada Sandstone unit wt = 140 pcf, c = 1000, phi = 45 deg
(3) Clay Layer unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 50 psf, phi = 27 deg
Distance, ft
300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Divider Berm
End of Construction
North Face Analysis with Live Loads – 34 kipAxle Load
Figure E.1-31
1.2
Tailings Elev. 4422.5 ft.
(1)
(2)(3)
(1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0, phi = 32 deg
(2) Entrada Sandstone unit wt = 140 pcf, c = 1000, phi = 45 deg
(3) Clay Layer unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 50 psf, phi = 27 deg
File Name: Divider Berm Final HT.gsz
Date: 10/27/2008
Divider Berm Live Load Analysis (34k Axle Load)
End of Construction
Distance, ft
300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Divider Berm
End of Construction
Live Load Analysis North Face – Vibratory Compactor on Back of Slope
Figure E.1-32
1.6
Tailings Elev. 4422.5 ft.
(1)
(2)(3)
File Name: Divider Berm Final HT.gsz
Date: 10/27/2008
Divider Berm
(1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0, phi = 32 deg
(2) Entrada Sandstone unit wt = 140 pcf, c = 1000, phi = 45 deg
(3) Clay Layer unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 50 psf, phi = 27 deg
End of Construction
Live Load Analysis
Vibratory Compactor
2,065 psf (weight at drum)
Caterpillar CS76XT or similar
Distance, ft
300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Divider Berm
End of Construction
Live Load Analysis North Face – Vibratory Compactor on Front of Slope
Figure E.1-33
1.2
Tailings Elev. 4422.5 ft.
(1)
(2)(3)
File Name: Divider Berm Final HT.gsz
Date: 10/27/2008
Divider Berm
(1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0, phi = 32 deg
(2) Entrada Sandstone unit wt = 140 pcf, c = 1000, phi = 45 deg
(3) Clay Layer unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 50 psf, phi = 27 deg
End of Construction
Live Load Analysis
Vibratory Compactor
2,065 psf (weight at drum)
Caterpillar CS76XT or similar
Distance, ft
300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Divider Berm
End of Tailings Deposition
Steady State Seepage Analysis
Figure E.1-34
-7500
-6500
-5500
-4500
-1000
Tailings Elev. 4422.5 ft.
(1)
(2)(3)
File Name: Divider Berm Final HT ck.gsz
Date: 11/20/2008
Divider Berm
(1) Entrada sandstone k = ..01 cm/s
(2) Sand Fill k = 0..01 cm/s
(3) Clay Layer k = 1e-7 cm/s
(4) Tailings k = 5 e -5 cm/s
Seepage Analysis
End of Tailings Deposition
Distance, ft
300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.150
4.175
4.200
4.225
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Divider Berm
End of Tailings Deposition
South Face Static Analysis
Figure E.1-35
1.7 Tailings Elev. 4422.5 ft.
(1)
(2)(3)
File Name: Divider Berm Final HT.gsz
Date: 10/22/2008
Divider Berm
End of Tailings Deposition
(1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0, phi = 32 deg
(2) Entrada Sandstone unit wt = 140 pcf, c = 1000, phi = 45 deg
(3) Clay Layer unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 50 psf, phi = 27 deg
(4) Tailings unit wt = 100 pcf, c = 0, phi = 10 deg
(4)
Distance, ft
300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Divider Berm
End of Tailings Deposition
South Face Pseudostatic Analysis
Figure E.1-36
1.2 Tailings Elev. 4422.5 ft.
Pseudostatic (0.12g)
(1)
(2)(3)
File Name: Divider Berm Final HT.gsz
Date: 10/22/2008
Divider Berm
End of Tailings Deposition
(1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0, phi = 32 deg
(2) Entrada Sandstone unit wt = 140 pcf, c = 1000, phi = 45 deg
(3) Clay Layer unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 50 psf, phi = 27 deg
(4) Tailings unit wt = 100 pcf, c = 0, phi = 10 deg
(4)
Distance, ft
300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Divider Berm
End of Tailings Deposition
South Face Analysis with Live Loads
Figure E.1-37
1.4 Tailings Elev. 4422.5 ft.
(1)
(2)(3)
File Name: Divider Berm Final HT.gsz
Date: 10/27/2008
Divider Berm
End of Tailings Deposition
(1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0, phi = 32 deg
(2) Entrada Sandstone unit wt = 140 pcf, c = 1000, phi = 45 deg
(3) Clay Layer unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 50 psf, phi = 27 deg
(4) Tailings unit wt = 100 pcf, c = 0, phi = 10 deg
Live Load Analysis (34k Axel Load)
Distance, ft
300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Divider Berm
End of Tailings Deposition
Live Load Analysis South Face – Vibratory Compactor on Back of Slope
Figure E.1-38
1.6 Tailings Elev. 4422.5 ft.
(1)
(2)(3)
File Name: Divider Berm Final HT.gsz
Date: 10/29/2008
Divider Berm
(1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0, phi = 32 deg
(2) Entrada Sandstone unit wt = 140 pcf, c = 1000, phi = 45 deg
(3) Clay Layer unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 50 psf, phi = 27 deg
(4) Tailings unit wt = 100 pcf, c = 0, phi = 10 deg
End of Tailings Deposition
Live Load Analysis
Vibratory Compactor
2,065 psf (weight at drum)
Caterpillar CS76XT or similar
Distance, ft
300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Divider Berm
End of Tailings Deposition
Live Load Analysis South Face – Vibratory Compactor on Front of Slope
Figure E.1-39
1.2 Tailings Elev. 4422.5 ft.
(1)
(2)(3)
File Name: Divider Berm Final HT.gsz
Date: 10/29/2008
Divider Berm
End of Tailings Deposition
Live Load Analysis
Vibratory Compactor
2,065 psf (weight at drum)
Caterpillar CS76XT or similar(1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0, phi = 32 deg
(2) Entrada Sandstone unit wt = 140 pcf, c = 1000, phi = 45 deg
(3) Clay Layer unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 27 deg
(4) Tailings unit wt = 100 pcf, c = 0, phi = 10 deg
Distance, ft
300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Divider Berm
End of Tailings Deposition
North Face Static Analysis
Figure E.1-40
1.6 Tailings Elev. 4422.5 ft.
(1)
(2)(3)
File Name: Divider Berm Final HT.gsz
Date: 10/22/2008
Divider Berm
End of Tailings Deposition
(4)
(1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0, phi = 32 deg
(2) Entrada Sandstone unit wt = 140 pcf, c = 1000, phi = 45 deg
(3) Clay Layer unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 0 psf, phi = 27 deg
(4) Tailings unit wt = 100 pcf, c = 0, phi = 10 deg
Distance, ft
300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Divider Berm
End of Tailings Deposition
North Face Pseudostatic Analysis
Figure E.1-41
1.2 Tailings Elev. 4422.5 ft.
(1)
(2)(3)
File Name: Divider Berm Final HT.gsz
Date: 10/22/2008
Divider Berm
Pseudostatic (0.12g)End of Tailings Deposition
(1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0, phi = 32 deg
(2) Entrada Sandstone unit wt = 140 pcf, c = 1000, phi = 45 deg
(3) Clay Layer unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 50 psf, phi = 27 deg
(4) Tailings unit wt = 100 pcf, c = 0, phi = 10 deg
(4)
Distance, ft
300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400
November 2008
P;\\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Design Report\Revised Report September 2008\Figures\Slope Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Divider Berm
End of Tailings Deposition
North Face Analysis with Live Loads
Figure E.1-42
1.6 Tailings Elev. 4422.5 ft.
(1)
(2)(3)
File Name: Divider Berm Final HT.gsz
Date: 10/27/2008
Divider Berm
End of Tailings Deposition
(1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0, phi = 32 deg
(2) Entrada Sandstone unit wt = 140 pcf, c = 1000, phi = 45 deg
(3) Clay Layer unit wt. = 122 pcf, cohesion = 50 psf, phi = 27 deg
(4) Tailings unit wt = 100 pcf, c = 0, phi = 10 deg
Live Load Analysis (34k Axle Load)
(4)
Distance, ft
300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
t

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.250
4.275
4.300
4.325
4.350
4.375
4.400

APPENDIX E.2
PROCESS PONDS
November 2008
P\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Process Ponds\PPond Slope Seep Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Process Ponds Cross Section A
End of Construction
Seepage Analysis
Figure E.2-1
-8 0 0 0
-6000
-4000
-2000
0
2000
File Name: PPonds Cross Section A report version HT.gsz
(2)
(1)
(4)
(3)
(1) Sand Fill k = .01 cm/s
(2) Bedrock (Entrada Sandstone) k = .01 cm/s
(3) Prepared Foundation (Natural Sands) k = .01 cm/s
(4) Compacted Clay Liner (CCL) k = 1 e -7 cm/s
Distance
75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.23
4.24
4.25
4.26
4.27
4.28
4.29
4.30
4.31
4.32
4.33
4.34
4.35
4.36
4.37
4.38
4.39
4.40
4.41
4.42
4.43
4.44
4.45
4.46
4.47
4.48
4.49
4.50
4.51
November 2008
P\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Process Ponds\PPond Slope Seep Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Process Ponds Cross Section A
End of Construction
West Face Static Analysis
Figure E.2-2
1.6
File Name: PPonds Cross Section A report version HT.gsz
(2)
(1)
(4)
(3)
1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 32 deg
2) Bedrock (Entrada Sandstone) unit wt = 140, c = 1000 psf, phi = 45 deg
3) Prepared Foundation (Natural Sands) unit wt = 116 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 32 deg
4) Compacted Clay Liner (CCL) unit wt = 122 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 27 deg
Distance
75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.23
4.24
4.25
4.26
4.27
4.28
4.29
4.30
4.31
4.32
4.33
4.34
4.35
4.36
4.37
4.38
4.39
4.40
4.41
4.42
4.43
4.44
4.45
4.46
4.47
4.48
4.49
4.50
4.51
November 2008
P\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Process Ponds\PPond Slope Seep Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Process Ponds Cross Section A
End of Construction
West Face Pseudostatic Analysis
Figure E.2-3
1.2
File Name: PPonds Cross Section A report version HT.gsz
(2)
(1)
(4)
(3)
Pseudostatic Analysis (0.12g)
1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 32 deg
2) Bedrock (Entrada Sandstone) unit wt = 140, c = 1000 psf, phi = 45 deg
3) Prepared Foundation (Natural Sands) unit wt = 116 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 32 deg
4) Compacted Clay Liner (CCL) unit wt = 122 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 27 deg
Distance
75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.23
4.24
4.25
4.26
4.27
4.28
4.29
4.30
4.31
4.32
4.33
4.34
4.35
4.36
4.37
4.38
4.39
4.40
4.41
4.42
4.43
4.44
4.45
4.46
4.47
4.48
4.49
4.50
4.51
November 2008
P\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Process Ponds\PPond Slope Seep Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Process Ponds Cross Section A
End of Construction
West Face Static Analysis with Live Loads
Figure E.2-4
1.5
File Name: PPonds Cross Section A report version HT.gsz
(2)
(1)
(4)
(3)
Live Load Analysis (34K axel load)
1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 32 deg
2) Bedrock (Entrada Sandstone) unit wt = 140, c = 1000 psf, phi = 45 deg
3) Prepared Foundation (Natural Sands) unit wt = 116 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 32 deg
4) Compacted Clay Liner (CCL) unit wt = 122 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 27 deg
Distance
75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.23
4.24
4.25
4.26
4.27
4.28
4.29
4.30
4.31
4.32
4.33
4.34
4.35
4.36
4.37
4.38
4.39
4.40
4.41
4.42
4.43
4.44
4.45
4.46
4.47
4.48
4.49
4.50
4.51
November 2008
P\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Process Ponds\PPond Slope Seep Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Process Ponds Cross Section A
End of Construction
East Face Static Analysis
Figure E.2-5
1.7
File Name: PPonds Cross Section A report version HT.gsz
(2)
(1)
(4)
(3)
1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 32 deg
2) Bedrock (Entrada Sandstone) unit wt = 140, c = 1000 psf, phi = 45 deg
3) Prepared Foundation (Natural Sands) unit wt = 116 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 32 deg
4) Compacted Clay Liner (CCL) unit wt = 122 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 27 deg
Distance
75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.23
4.24
4.25
4.26
4.27
4.28
4.29
4.30
4.31
4.32
4.33
4.34
4.35
4.36
4.37
4.38
4.39
4.40
4.41
4.42
4.43
4.44
4.45
4.46
4.47
4.48
4.49
4.50
4.51
November 2008
P\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Process Ponds\PPond Slope Seep Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Process Ponds Cross Section A
End of Construction
East Face Pseudostatic Analysis
Figure E.2-6
1.2
File Name: PPonds Cross Section A report version HT.gsz
(2)
(1)
(4)
(3)
1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 32 deg
2) Bedrock (Entrada Sandstone) unit wt = 140, c = 1000 psf, phi = 45 deg
3) Prepared Foundation (Natural Sands) unit wt = 116 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 32 deg
4) Compacted Clay Liner (CCL) unit wt = 122 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 27 deg
Pseudostatic Analysis (0.12g)
Distance
75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.23
4.24
4.25
4.26
4.27
4.28
4.29
4.30
4.31
4.32
4.33
4.34
4.35
4.36
4.37
4.38
4.39
4.40
4.41
4.42
4.43
4.44
4.45
4.46
4.47
4.48
4.49
4.50
4.51
November 2008
P\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Process Ponds\PPond Slope Seep Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Process Ponds Cross Section A
End of Construction
East Face Static Analysis with Live Loads
Figure E.2-7
1.7
File Name: PPonds Cross Section A report version HT.gsz
(2)
(1)
(4)
(3)
Live Load Analysis (34K axel load)1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 32 deg
2) Bedrock (Entrada Sandstone) unit wt = 140, c = 1000 psf, phi = 45 deg
3) Prepared Foundation (Natural Sands) unit wt = 116 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 32 deg
4) Compacted Clay Liner (CCL) unit wt = 122 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 27 deg
Distance
75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.23
4.24
4.25
4.26
4.27
4.28
4.29
4.30
4.31
4.32
4.33
4.34
4.35
4.36
4.37
4.38
4.39
4.40
4.41
4.42
4.43
4.44
4.45
4.46
4.47
4.48
4.49
4.50
4.51
November 2008
P\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Process Ponds\PPond Slope Seep Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Process Ponds Cross Section A
End of Phase I
Seepage Analysis
Figure E.2-8
-8000
-6000
-4000
File Name: PPonds Cross Section A report version HT.gsz
(2)
(1)
(4)
(3)
(1) Sand Fill k = .01 cm/s
(2) Bedrock (Entrada Sandstone) k = .01 cm/s
(3) Prepared Foundation (Natural Sands) k = .01 cm/s
(4) Compacted Clay Liner (CCL) k = 1 e -7 cm/s
Distance
75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.23
4.24
4.25
4.26
4.27
4.28
4.29
4.30
4.31
4.32
4.33
4.34
4.35
4.36
4.37
4.38
4.39
4.40
4.41
4.42
4.43
4.44
4.45
4.46
4.47
4.48
4.49
4.50
4.51
November 2008
P\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Process Ponds\PPond Slope Seep Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Process Ponds Cross Section A
End of Phase I
West Face Static Analysis
Figure E.2-9
1.6
File Name: PPonds Cross Section A report version HT.gsz
(2)
(1)
(4)
(3)
1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 32 deg
2) Bedrock (Entrada Sandstone) unit wt = 140, c = 1000 psf, phi = 45 deg
3) Prepared Foundation (Natural Sands) unit wt = 116 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 32 deg
4) Compacted Clay Liner (CCL) unit wt = 122 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 27 deg
Distance
75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.23
4.24
4.25
4.26
4.27
4.28
4.29
4.30
4.31
4.32
4.33
4.34
4.35
4.36
4.37
4.38
4.39
4.40
4.41
4.42
4.43
4.44
4.45
4.46
4.47
4.48
4.49
4.50
4.51
November 2008
P\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Process Ponds\PPond Slope Seep Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Process Ponds Cross Section A
End of Phase I
West Face Pseudostatic Analysis
Figure E.2-10
1.2
File Name: PPonds Cross Section A report version HT.gsz
(2)
(1)
(4)
(3)
Pseudostatic Analysis (0.12g)
1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 32 deg
2) Bedrock (Entrada Sandstone) unit wt = 140, c = 1000 psf, phi = 45 deg
3) Prepared Foundation (Natural Sands) unit wt = 116 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 32 deg
4) Compacted Clay Liner (CCL) unit wt = 122 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 27 deg
Distance
75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.23
4.24
4.25
4.26
4.27
4.28
4.29
4.30
4.31
4.32
4.33
4.34
4.35
4.36
4.37
4.38
4.39
4.40
4.41
4.42
4.43
4.44
4.45
4.46
4.47
4.48
4.49
4.50
4.51
November 2008
P\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Process Ponds\PPond Slope Seep Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Process Ponds Cross Section A
End of Phase I
West Face Static Analysis with Live Loads
Figure E.2-11
1.5
File Name: PPonds Cross Section A report version HT.gsz
(2)
(1)
(4)
(3)
Live Load Analysis (34K axel load)
1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 32 deg
2) Bedrock (Entrada Sandstone) unit wt = 140, c = 1000 psf, phi = 45 deg
3) Prepared Foundation (Natural Sands) unit wt = 116 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 32 deg
4) Compacted Clay Liner (CCL) unit wt = 122 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 27 deg
Distance
75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.23
4.24
4.25
4.26
4.27
4.28
4.29
4.30
4.31
4.32
4.33
4.34
4.35
4.36
4.37
4.38
4.39
4.40
4.41
4.42
4.43
4.44
4.45
4.46
4.47
4.48
4.49
4.50
4.51
November 2008
P\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Process Ponds\PPond Slope Seep Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Process Ponds Cross Section A
End of Phase I
East Face Static Analysis
Figure E.2-12
2.6
File Name: PPonds Cross Section A report version HT.gsz
(2)
(1)
(4)
(3)
1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 32 deg
2) Bedrock (Entrada Sandstone) unit wt = 140, c = 1000 psf, phi = 45 deg
3) Prepared Foundation (Natural Sands) unit wt = 116 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 32 deg
4) Compacted Clay Liner (CCL) unit wt = 122 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 27 deg
Distance
75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.23
4.24
4.25
4.26
4.27
4.28
4.29
4.30
4.31
4.32
4.33
4.34
4.35
4.36
4.37
4.38
4.39
4.40
4.41
4.42
4.43
4.44
4.45
4.46
4.47
4.48
4.49
4.50
4.51
November 2008
P\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Process Ponds\PPond Slope Seep Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Process Ponds Cross Section A
End of Phase I
East Face Pseudostatic Analysis
Figure E.2-13
1.7
File Name: PPonds Cross Section A report version HT.gsz
1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 32 deg
2) Bedrock (Entrada Sandstone) unit wt = 140, c = 1000 psf, phi = 45 deg
3) Prepared Foundation (Natural Sands) unit wt = 116 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 32 deg
4) Compacted Clay Liner (CCL) unit wt = 122 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 27 deg
(2)
(1)
(4)
(3)
Pseudostatic Analysis (0.12g)
Distance
75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.23
4.24
4.25
4.26
4.27
4.28
4.29
4.30
4.31
4.32
4.33
4.34
4.35
4.36
4.37
4.38
4.39
4.40
4.41
4.42
4.43
4.44
4.45
4.46
4.47
4.48
4.49
4.50
4.51
November 2008
P\181692 Shootaring Canyon\Process Ponds\PPond Slope Seep Figures.ppt
Project No: 114-181692
Process Ponds Cross Section A
End of Phase I
East Face Static Analysis with Live Loads
Figure E.2-14
1.6
File Name: PPonds Cross Section A report version HT.gsz
(2)
(1)
(4)
(3)
Live Load Analysis (34K axel load)
1) Sand Fill unit wt = 125 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 32 deg
2) Bedrock (Entrada Sandstone) unit wt = 140, c = 1000 psf, phi = 45 deg
3) Prepared Foundation (Natural Sands) unit wt = 116 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 32 deg
4) Compacted Clay Liner (CCL) unit wt = 122 pcf, c = 0 psf, phi = 27 deg
Distance
75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
x

1
0
0
0
)
4.23
4.24
4.25
4.26
4.27
4.28
4.29
4.30
4.31
4.32
4.33
4.34
4.35
4.36
4.37
4.38
4.39
4.40
4.41
4.42
4.43
4.44
4.45
4.46
4.47
4.48
4.49
4.50
4.51

APPENDIX F
TAILINGS STORAGE FACILITY AND PROCESS PONDS WATER
BALANCES

APPENDIX F.1
GOLDSIM MODEL

Appendix F.1 1
APPENDIX F.1
GoldSim Model

A detailed water and tailings mass balance computer model was developed for the Shootaring Tailings
Storage Facility (TSF) using the dynamic modeling platform called GoldSim (V. 9.6. GoldSim
Technology Group, LLC. Copyright 1998-2007). A detailed water balance was also developed for the
Process Ponds. This appendix provides a detailed description of the GoldSim model using the water
balance for the TSF. The water balance model for the Process Ponds follows the same principles as
discussed herein for the TSF.

GoldSim is a Windows-based computer program used to simulate engineering systems and is highly
suited to work with the system variability of a mine site as it is being constructed and/or operated. The
model simulates the key inflows and outflows to the system that contribute to changes in pond volume
during the life of the mill as well as tracking the total volume of solids deposited in each cell.

GoldSim is a powerful and flexible platform for visualizing and numerically simulating physical systems
such as a water balance. In a sense, GoldSim is like a “visual spreadsheet” that allows you to visually
create and manipulate data and equations (See Glossary for a description of the GoldSim building blocks).
Unlike spreadsheets, however, GoldSim allows you to readily evaluate how a system evolves over time
and predict future behavior. This simulation environment is highly graphical and offers an array of built-
in building blocks suited for building a simulation model of the mill system.

The primary building block for a water balance model is called a “Stock”. This is the model component
that allows for the storage and release of material. In this case the tailings cell was represented by as
individual stock (Figure 1).

Tailings_Pool_Volume_South

Figure 1 GoldSim Stock Component

The rate of change in total volume of water in the stock is dictated by the rate of withdrawal and the rate
of addiction. The rate of change in volume in the stock is governed by the equation:

Q - Q dt
d(V)
outin=

Where:
Qin = flow rate into system (volume/time)
Qout = flow rate out of system (volume/time)
V = volume of tailings cell (volume)

Which can be solved in a step-wise fashion by the following equations:

Appendix F.1 2
V = V + (Q-Q)ti+1 i in out
Δ

Thus, the volume contained in the stock at any given time can be calculated based on the rates of inflow
and outflow and the given time step. Both a spreadsheet water balance model and a water balance built in
GoldSim use this same equation to evaluate the change in volume as a function of time. A spreadsheet
model is typically set up with each row in the spreadsheet representing point in time defining the inflows
and outflow to the system. The final volume is determined by connection back to the prior volume and
adding summing inflows and outflow at each time stop. GoldSim works in much the same way. The
model’s inflow and outflows would use the same equations and relationships as described in the first row
of a spreadsheet model. However, the remaining rows are calculated by setting the model’s start time,
time step, and a total run time.

GoldSim models can be built in a hierarchical and modular manner by creating and linking together
subsystems. The building block for creating a modular based GoldSim model is the container (Figure 2).
The container shown in Figure 2 from the water balance model contains the components that are used to
calculate the outflow from the South Cell (i.e. evaporation and entrained water).

Outflows_South

Figure 2 Container where Outflows are Calculated

Opening the “Outflows_South” container reveals the components and relationships used to calculate
outflow from the South Cell. Evaporative losses from the impoundment are calculated in the expression
“Pool_Evaporation” and, as shown in Figure 3, is a function of the pan factor (Pool_Pan_Factor),
monthly evaporation rate (Current_Evap_Mean), and pond surface area (Total_Pond_Area_South). (See
Glossary for a description of the GoldSim building blocks).
Entrained_Water_Cals_South
XX
Pool_Evaporation
Outflow_Total_South
3.14
16
Pool_Pan_Factor
XX
Total_Pond_Area_South_1
XX
Current_Evap_Mean_1

Appendix F.1 3

Figure 3 Components included in the Container “Outflows_South” which Calculates System
Evaporative Losses

By putting the components together one can see how each component of a model is influenced by the
other components. As is show in Figure 4, the volume of water in the South Cell is influenced by
“Outflow_South”, which contains the equations used to calculate the total outflow for the cell,
“Inflows_South”, which calculates the amount of water inflow to the South Cell. As is shown one can
also see which components are influenced by the pond volume such as the “PondArea_South” and other
components contained in the container “TailsGeometry_South”. Also shown in this model is that total
pond area (PondArea_South) is a function of the pond volume (this relationship is defined in the lookup
table VolumeArea) and the pond volume is a function of Outflow, which in turn is a function of pond
area. This circular relationship between components is called a feed back loop and would be expected
since evaporation is a function of pond area and pond area is a function the total volume in the pond.

Outflows_South
Inflows_South
Tailings_Pool_Volume_South
TailsGeometry_South
VolumeArea
XX
PondArea_South
XX
VolumeChange
XX
WaterWellFlow
T
1 τ2 τ3 τ
LastPondVolume

Figure 4 Water Balance Sub-model for the South Pond

Another important container in the South Cell water balance model is TailsGeometry_South. As
indicated by the name, this component holds the elements necessary to calculate the geometry of the
tailings as they are being filled (Figure 5). The container handles the tracking of tails volumes and
calculates the area and volumes based on the Volume-Elevation and Volume-Area relationships that were
developed for the model.

Appendix F.1 4
This Container calculates the Tailings surface area and the Elevations of
both the Tailings solids and the Pool elevations.
The total volume of saturated tailings = total retained water +
Total Tailings solids
Two lookup tables are used here:
Volume versus Surface Area
Volume versus Elevation
XX
Cum_Tailings_Volume_South
XX
Total_Tailings_Area_South
dt
Cum_Solids_Deposited_South
TailsVol_VS_SurfaceArea_SCell
dt
CumWaterVolumeRetainedSouth
TailsVol_VS_Elevation_SCell
TailsVolumeSouth
XX
VolumeTailsPlusPondWater_South XX
Tails_Pool_Elevation_South
SurfaceElev_South
XX
Total_Pond_Area_South

Figure 5 Tailings Geometry Calculations

Model Inflows

Tailings Slurry – In the model, tailings slurry is produced at a rate of 63.6 or 42.3 tons/hr over the entire
life of the mill based on a production rate of 750 or 500 dry tons of ore per day, respectively, over 350
days per year. The tailings slurry is 49.2 percent solids by weight with a solids density of 97 lb/ft2. An
additional 100,000 cubic yards of existing contaminated soil at the site will be excavated and added to the
South Cell after it is complete. The rate of excavation is assumed to be approximately 1,380 yds3/day for
60 days. The tailings slurry inflow is represented by the sub-model shown in Figure 6. Also depicted in
the Figure 6 is the rate of addition of the contaminated soils excavated and deposited in the South Cell.

Appendix F.1 5

Figure 6 GoldSim Representation of the Mill

Precipitation – Average monthly rainfall values were used to determine the precipitation contribution to
the tailings water pool. In GoldSim this was represented using a lookup table containing monthly
precipitation values. Therefore, at each month in the model the lookup table is used to get the
precipitation rate. This rate was then applied to the contributing surface area to calculate a flow rate.

Runoff - Precipitation from the mill site can produce runoff which can contribute to the pond size. The
Mill Area was assigned a runoff coefficient based on the month and the topography (see Section 8 and
Appendix G.3). In GoldSim this was represented by a series of lookup tables and constants representing
the calculations (Figure 7).

Figure 7 Runoff Calculations

Appendix F.1 6

Model Outflows

The outflow from the TSF includes evaporation from the open water surface and water that becomes
permanently entrained in the tailings mass. It was assumed in the modeling that any water removed from
the cell is returned to the cell. The impoundment will be lined with a double 60 mil HDPE liner, so no
seepage or deep infiltration losses were incorporated into the water balance model.

Evaporation – Evaporative losses from the water pool were modeled by multiplying the impoundment
water pool area by the monthly evaporation rate. The evaporation rates (Table 1) used were estimated
from the water balance conducted for the Tony M. Mine (Tetra Tech, 2006). See Appendix E.2 for
discussion of estimation of the evaporation rates. This model was discussed in the above text (see Figure
3).

Table 1 Net Evaporation Rates (in inches)
Weather Station Location
Month
Department
of Interior Wahweap Page Mexican Hat Moab Piute Dam
Station Number 29114 26180 425582 425733 426897
Estimated
Evap. for
Tony M
Mine Site
Period of Record 1962-1997
1963-
1981 1958-1993
1959-
1980 1920-1970
January 2.54 2.5
February 2.72 2.7
March 3.10 4.29 3.58 3.2
April 4.24 6.39 5.79 5.80 4.53 4.8
May 5.10 9.26 7.71 8.02 6.59 5.52 7.1
June 6.89 10.91 9.64 9.84 8.02 7.11 8.8
July 7.71 11.01 9.36 9.62 8.26 6.56 8.8
August 8.37 10.05 7.78 7.77 6.77 5.23 7.3
September 7.47 7.20 5.50 5.67 4.53 4.23 5.0
October 5.25 4.96 3.00 3.17 2.91 3.1
November 3.42 2.56 1.13 0.89 2.5
December 3.31 2.4
Annual 60.12 66.63 53.49 50.77 38.70 31.55 58.2
Note: Evaporation rate data from surrounding weather stations was derived from a Class A pan evaporation data
using a evaporation pan factor of 0.70.

The surface area was calculated based on a volume versus surface area relationship developed for each of
the cells. The total volume of material (solids and water) contained in the cell at any given time was input
into this relationship to calculate the surface area available for evaporation. The total volume in the cell
at each time step was calculated by summing the total solids, the volume of entrained water, and the
volume of water pool at each point in time.

Entrained Water – Entrained water is the residual portion of the input water that is assumed to be held
within the pore spaces of the tailings and is not available as free water. The model assumes the placed
tailings remain saturated and that 26 percent of the discharged water is entrained within the solids. This
volumetric flow was calculated in the model by multiplying the discharge rate of water to the cell by 26
percent.

Appendix F.1 7
Reclaimed Water – It was assumed that 100 percent of the water from the LCS will be run back through
the mill.

Results

Tailings are discharged into South Cell until the cell is filled to elevation 4422.5 feet, allowing a
freeboard of 7.5 feet. A full listing of pond and surface elevations over time is provided in Appendix
E.3.1, Tables 1A and 1B.

The lifespan of the South Cell is 7.5 years for an ore production rate of 500 tons/day and is 3.8 years for
an ore production rate of 750 tons/day.

GLOSSARY:

GoldSim Building Blocks

Stock Elements: A class of elements that numerically integrate inputs, and hence are responsible for
internally generating the dynamic behavior of many systems. Stocks elements are elements which impart
inertia and memory to a system. These kinds of elements are responsible for internally generating the
dynamic behavior of a system. At any point in time in a simulation, the outputs of stock elements are
computed based on the historical values of their inputs. Mathematically, stocks represent integrals. This
element accepts inflow and outflows as a function of time, and stores the change of volume.

Element Default Symbol Function
Reservoir
Tailings_Pool_Volume_South
Integrates (and conserves) flows
of materials, allowing for upper
and lower bounds to be specified.
Integrator
dt
Cum_WaterVolRetained_South
Integrates values. Often used for
running totals.

Container: A complex model may consist of many hundreds or thousands of individual elements. In
order to manage, organize and view such a model it is useful (in fact, essential) to create separate sub-
groups or collections of elements.
Such sub-groups are created in GoldSim by placing elements into Containers. A Container is simply a
"box" into which other elements have been placed. In a sense, it is like a directory folder on your
computer. Containers can be placed inside other Containers, and any number of levels of containment can
be created.
Entrained_Water_Cals_South

Appendix F.1 8
Input elements: Used to create inputs that subsequently define the properties of other elements. For
examples the Pool_Pan_Factor is a constant used in the calculation of evaporation and the Time Series
OldTailsAddtion is a table of data defining the amount of excavated tails added to the South Cell each
month.
Element Default Symbol Function
Data 3.14
16
Pool_Pan_Factor
Defines scalar, vector or matrix
data.
Stochastic
Stochastic1
Defines uncertain data as
probability distributions.
Time Series
(t)f
OldTailsAddition
Accepts time histories of data and
converts them to an appropriate
form for use in the model.

Function elements are elements that manipulate and transform information or material. At any point in
time in a simulation, the outputs of these elements are computed based on the current values of their
inputs.

Element Default Symbol Function
Expression
XX
VolumeChange
Defines mathematical or logical expressions.
Previous
Value
T
1 τ2 τ3 τ
LastPondVolume
Returns the value of its input from the previous model update.
Extrema
MaxElevation
Computes the highest (peak) or lowest (valley) value achieved
by its input.
Splitter
FlowSpliter
Splits an incoming signal into multiple outputs based on
specified fractions.
Sum
Outflow_Total_South
Facilities the addition of multiple values.

Appendix F.1 9
Element Default Symbol Function
Lookup
Table 3.14
16
PercentWaterLossInTails
Defines a one, tow or three dimensional lookup table (response
surface).

Events: Another category of elements allows you to superimpose the occurrence and effects of discrete
events onto continuously varying systems. A descrete event was used to initiae when to move the tailings
discharge line.
Element Default Symbol Function
Timed Event
756
121110
84
21
93
StartPhase2
Generates discrete event signals based on a specified rate of
occurrence, regularly or according to a specified distribution (i.e.,
randomly).
Triggered
Event ?
MoveSpigot
Generates discrete event signals based on one or more specified
conditions.
Status
S_Over4449_Done
Generates a condition (True/False) in response to particular events or
specified conditions.
Discrete
Change
S_Over4449
Generates a discrete change signal (a value) that can subsequently
discretely modify the values of other elements (e.g., Integrators and
Reservoirs).(why a smaller font?)

APPENDIX F.2
TONY M MINE WATER BALANCE (APPENDIX 2 OF REPORT, TETRA
TECH, 2006)
G-19
APPENDIX 2
TONY M EVAPORATION POND WATER BALANCE MINE DEWATERING AND
PHASE I EXPANSION
TONY M EVAPORATION POND WATER BALANCE
MINE DEWATERING AND PHASE 1 EXPANSION
A Phase 1 water balance for the Tony M Mine evaporation pond is presented in Table A.
The water balance, which has a projected start date of June 1, 2007, is based on pumping
an average of 200 gallons per minute (gpm) during the initial two months of operation to
dewater the existing workings and then pumping at a lower rate to keep up with water
inflowing into the existing mine entries and advancing faces. The initial rate of water
inflow (once the mine is fully dewatered) was estimated to be 100 gpm based on historic
data. The future inflow rate, which is dependent on the formation characteristics and the
rate of mine expansion, is not known at this time.
A breached dam is located on the east side of the pond and will be rebuilt. This dam
blocks the primary west to east drainage through the pond area. The current crest of the
dam is 4,879 feet; however, the maximum water height will be controlled by a small dike
in the southwest corner of the pond that has a height of 4,876.
The water balance was calculated up to an elevation of 4874 feet (i.e., five feet of
freeboard at the dam) and a surface area of approximately 18 acres. Given the pumping
assumptions described in the first paragraph above and a net annual evaporation rate of
58 inches, the water balance predicted that the pond would reach the 4,874-foot elevation
in 31 months. The data and methods used to create the water balance table are described
below.
Evaporation Pond Capacity:The pond capacity was determined using 2006
topographical maps accurate to one-foot contour elevations. The surface area was
determined for each one-foot elevation increment in the area behind the dam starting at
4,843 feet. The average area for each one foot interval was then multiplied by one foot
and converted to both gallons and acre feet to develop storage curves for the pond,
presented as Graphs A-1 and A-2, respectively. Stripping of the upper four inches of clay
liner was not included in the storage curve; this stripping is expected to provide an
additional 2 million gallons of storage capacity.
When comparing the new aerial maps to the design drawings for the original dam, we
found that the previous maps and storage curves for the pond were consistently low by
four feet (i.e., the designs and curves were correct but the elevations shown were four feet
lower than the new aerial maps). This is shown on Graph B. Accordingly, this needs to
be taken into account when interpreting the previous operation data for the facility. The
new storage curve developed for the project is almost identical to the previous storage
curve except for the four foot difference in elevation.
Net Evaporation Rates: Armstrong Engineers, the original designers of the evaporation
pond, used a monthly evaporation/precipitation table with an annual net evaporation rate
of 60.12 inches to develop a water balance for the pond in 1980. This information was
from Lake Powell and was provided by the Department of Interior, Water and Power
Resources Service. We were unable to verify the source and accuracy of this information;
therefore, we analyzed the data available from climate stations located in southern Utah
and northern Arizona. This information is presented in tabular and graphical form in
Table B and Graphs C-1, C-2, and C-3. The net evaporation for the site was estimated as
being about midway between the higher values reported for stations south of the site
(Wahweap, Page, and Mexican Hat) and the lower values reported for stations north of
the site (Moab and Piute Dam). The resulting curve was similar to the 1980 curve but
with a peak evaporation rate occurring in July rather than August. The total annual net
evaporation was estimated to be 58.2 inches, which was consistent with the 60.12 inches
used previously.
Inflow Rates: There are two sources of water inflow into the pond. The first source is
precipitation that falls within the 50.8-acre basin in which the evaporation pond is
located. This inflow source is relatively minor as the area receives an average of only 7.2
inches of precipitation per year. Precipitation inflow was estimated by multiplying the
monthly average precipitation times the pond surface area and also times the remaining
acreage in the basin and a runoff coefficient of 30 percent.
The estimated steady-state pumping rate of 100 gpm from the existing workings was
determined by evaluating the reported pumping rates and pond elevation data that Plateau
Resources submitted to the state agencies and conducting interviews with personnel that
previously worked at the mine. The data from the state agencies was presented on the
storage curve developed for the original pond. The curve showed that water was first
discharged into the pond in February 1981 at a rate of 30 to 50 gpm. A rate of 30 gpm
was then reported from June 30, 1981 to June 30, 1982. On October 20, 1982, the
pumping rate was reported at 100 gpm. A rate of 115 gpm was reported in December
1982 and February 1983. A rate of 118 gpm was reported in March 1983. The March
pumping rate was the last recorded, however, the pond elevation was recorded up until
August 29, 1983. This elevation of 4863 (actual of 4867) corresponded to a pond volume
of about 64 million gallons.
With the exception of 1,500 tons of ore mined in 1986, mining operations were
discontinued in 1983. Therefore, we know that approximately 120 gpm was being
pumped from the mine when it shut down. However, we do not know how many hours
per day that the pump was running. Several miners that worked there have told IUSA
personnel that the pumps ran only intermittently. In order to evaluate the previous
pumping rates, the elevation/volume data from October 20, 1982 to August 29, 1983 was
input it into our water balance table. Because the 1982 and 1983 years were relatively
wet, precipitation was increased by approximately 40 percent above average and the
annual evaporation rate was decreased by 20 percent below average in the model to better
reflect actual conditions. The water balance model indicated that an average pumping rate
of 100 gpm produced storage volumes comparable to those recorded by Plateau
Resources during that time period.
The open workings below the water boundary are estimated to have a volume of
2,000,000 cubic feet and contain an estimated 15.4 million gallons of water. The
estimated time of two months to dewater is based on pumping an average of 200 gpm
with groundwater inflows increasing from 0 to 100 gpm during the dewatering period.
Future Inflow Rates: As the main declines are extended further to the north and
downdip, ground water inflow rates into the mine could increase. However, review of the
mine history reveals that the dewatering rate did not increase substantially as the main
decline was developed in a northerly direction. Rather, pumping rates increased when a
large number of rooms were developed off the main declines in the area that is currently
flooded. IUSA has indicated that it plans to block off many of these rooms to reduce both
ventilation and dewatering requirements and concentrate on extending the main declines.
Therefore, pumping rates are not expected to increase appreciably during Phase 1.
Additional Pond Capacity: If needed, additional pond capacity can be created by
raising the emergency overflow dike and the dam with approval of the State Engineer.
The pond could also be expanded further to the west if a second dam was installed
southwest of the emergency overflow dike. Westerly expansion would create a much
larger evaporation pond capable of storing and evaporating water discharges of 300 gpm
or more.

APPENDIX F.3
WATER BALANCE CAPACITY TABLES

APPENDIX F.3.1
TAILINGS STORAGE FACILITY
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
5/1/2009 0.00 4362.00 4362.00 68.00
5/1/2009 0.00 4363.10 4362.90 66.93
5/2/2009 0.00 4363.40 4363.20 66.59
5/2/2009 0.00 4363.90 4363.60 66.14
5/3/2009 0.01 4364.30 4364.00 65.69
5/3/2009 0.01 4364.80 4364.30 65.24
5/4/2009 0.01 4365.20 4364.70 64.79
5/4/2009 0.01 4365.70 4365.10 64.34
5/5/2009 0.01 4366.10 4365.40 63.89
5/5/2009 0.01 4366.60 4365.80 63.44
5/6/2009 0.02 4367.00 4366.20 62.99
5/7/2009 0.02 4367.50 4366.50 62.54
5/7/2009 0.02 4367.90 4366.90 62.09
5/8/2009 0.02 4368.40 4367.20 61.65
5/8/2009 0.02 4368.80 4367.60 61.20
5/9/2009 0.02 4369.20 4368.00 60.75
5/9/2009 0.02 4369.70 4368.30 60.31
5/10/2009 0.03 4370.00 4368.70 59.96
5/10/2009 0.03 4370.20 4369.10 59.82
5/11/2009 0.03 4370.30 4369.40 59.69
5/12/2009 0.03 4370.40 4369.80 59.55
5/12/2009 0.03 4370.60 4370.10 59.42
5/13/2009 0.03 4370.70 4370.20 59.29
5/13/2009 0.03 4370.80 4370.30 59.15
5/14/2009 0.04 4371.00 4370.40 59.02
5/14/2009 0.04 4371.10 4370.50 58.88
5/15/2009 0.04 4371.30 4370.60 58.75
5/15/2009 0.04 4371.40 4370.70 58.61
5/16/2009 0.04 4371.50 4370.80 58.48
5/17/2009 0.04 4371.70 4370.90 58.35
5/17/2009 0.05 4371.80 4371.00 58.21
5/18/2009 0.05 4371.90 4371.20 58.08
5/18/2009 0.05 4372.10 4371.30 57.95
5/19/2009 0.05 4372.20 4371.40 57.81
5/19/2009 0.05 4372.30 4371.50 57.68
5/20/2009 0.05 4372.50 4371.60 57.54
5/20/2009 0.05 4372.60 4371.70 57.41
5/21/2009 0.06 4372.70 4371.80 57.28
5/22/2009 0.06 4372.90 4371.90 57.14
5/22/2009 0.06 4373.00 4372.00 57.01
5/23/2009 0.06 4373.10 4372.20 56.88
5/23/2009 0.06 4373.30 4372.30 56.74
5/24/2009 0.06 4373.40 4372.40 56.61
5/24/2009 0.07 4373.50 4372.50 56.48
5/25/2009 0.07 4373.70 4372.60 56.35
5/25/2009 0.07 4373.80 4372.70 56.21
5/26/2009 0.07 4373.90 4372.80 56.08
5/27/2009 0.07 4374.10 4372.90 55.95
5/27/2009 0.07 4374.20 4373.00 55.81
1 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
5/28/2009 0.07 4374.30 4373.20 55.68
5/28/2009 0.08 4374.50 4373.30 55.55
5/29/2009 0.08 4374.60 4373.40 55.42
5/29/2009 0.08 4374.70 4373.50 55.28
5/30/2009 0.08 4374.80 4373.60 55.15
5/30/2009 0.08 4375.00 4373.70 55.02
5/31/2009 0.08 4375.10 4373.80 54.89
6/1/2009 0.09 4375.20 4373.90 54.76
6/1/2009 0.09 4375.40 4374.00 54.63
6/2/2009 0.09 4375.50 4374.10 54.49
6/2/2009 0.09 4375.60 4374.30 54.36
6/3/2009 0.09 4375.80 4374.40 54.23
6/3/2009 0.09 4375.90 4374.50 54.10
6/4/2009 0.09 4376.00 4374.60 53.97
6/4/2009 0.10 4376.20 4374.70 53.84
6/5/2009 0.10 4376.30 4374.80 53.71
6/6/2009 0.10 4376.40 4374.90 53.58
6/6/2009 0.10 4376.50 4375.00 53.45
6/7/2009 0.10 4376.70 4375.10 53.33
6/7/2009 0.10 4376.80 4375.30 53.20
6/8/2009 0.10 4376.90 4375.40 53.07
6/8/2009 0.11 4377.10 4375.50 52.94
6/9/2009 0.11 4377.20 4375.60 52.81
6/9/2009 0.11 4377.30 4375.70 52.68
6/10/2009 0.11 4377.50 4375.80 52.55
6/11/2009 0.11 4377.60 4375.90 52.42
6/11/2009 0.11 4377.70 4376.00 52.29
6/12/2009 0.12 4377.80 4376.10 52.16
6/12/2009 0.12 4378.00 4376.30 52.03
6/13/2009 0.12 4378.10 4376.40 51.91
6/13/2009 0.12 4378.20 4376.50 51.78
6/14/2009 0.12 4378.40 4376.60 51.65
6/14/2009 0.12 4378.50 4376.70 51.52
6/15/2009 0.12 4378.60 4376.80 51.39
6/16/2009 0.13 4378.70 4376.90 51.26
6/16/2009 0.13 4378.90 4377.00 51.14
6/17/2009 0.13 4379.00 4377.10 51.01
6/17/2009 0.13 4379.10 4377.20 50.88
6/18/2009 0.13 4379.20 4377.40 50.75
6/18/2009 0.13 4379.40 4377.50 50.62
6/19/2009 0.14 4379.50 4377.60 50.50
6/19/2009 0.14 4379.60 4377.70 50.37
6/20/2009 0.14 4379.80 4377.80 50.24
6/21/2009 0.14 4379.90 4377.90 50.12
6/21/2009 0.14 4380.00 4378.00 49.99
6/22/2009 0.14 4380.10 4378.10 49.93
6/22/2009 0.14 4380.10 4378.20 49.87
6/23/2009 0.15 4380.20 4378.40 49.80
6/23/2009 0.15 4380.30 4378.50 49.74
2 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
6/24/2009 0.15 4380.30 4378.60 49.68
6/24/2009 0.15 4380.40 4378.70 49.61
6/25/2009 0.15 4380.50 4378.80 49.55
6/26/2009 0.15 4380.50 4378.90 49.49
6/26/2009 0.16 4380.60 4379.00 49.42
6/27/2009 0.16 4380.60 4379.10 49.36
6/27/2009 0.16 4380.70 4379.20 49.29
6/28/2009 0.16 4380.80 4379.40 49.23
6/28/2009 0.16 4380.80 4379.50 49.17
6/29/2009 0.16 4380.90 4379.60 49.10
6/29/2009 0.16 4381.00 4379.70 49.04
6/30/2009 0.17 4381.00 4379.80 48.98
7/1/2009 0.17 4381.10 4379.90 48.94
7/1/2009 0.17 4381.10 4379.90 48.92
7/2/2009 0.17 4381.10 4379.90 48.90
7/2/2009 0.17 4381.10 4380.00 48.88
7/3/2009 0.17 4381.10 4380.00 48.86
7/3/2009 0.17 4381.20 4380.00 48.84
7/4/2009 0.18 4381.20 4380.00 48.82
7/4/2009 0.18 4381.20 4380.00 48.80
7/5/2009 0.18 4381.20 4380.10 48.78
7/6/2009 0.18 4381.20 4380.10 48.76
7/6/2009 0.18 4381.30 4380.10 48.74
7/7/2009 0.18 4381.30 4380.10 48.72
7/7/2009 0.19 4381.30 4380.10 48.70
7/8/2009 0.19 4381.30 4380.10 48.68
7/8/2009 0.19 4381.30 4380.10 48.66
7/9/2009 0.19 4381.40 4380.20 48.64
7/9/2009 0.19 4381.40 4380.20 48.62
7/10/2009 0.19 4381.40 4380.20 48.60
7/11/2009 0.19 4381.40 4380.20 48.58
7/11/2009 0.20 4381.40 4380.20 48.56
7/12/2009 0.20 4381.50 4380.20 48.54
7/12/2009 0.20 4381.50 4380.20 48.52
7/13/2009 0.20 4381.50 4380.30 48.50
7/13/2009 0.20 4381.50 4380.30 48.48
7/14/2009 0.20 4381.50 4380.30 48.46
7/14/2009 0.21 4381.60 4380.30 48.44
7/15/2009 0.21 4381.60 4380.30 48.42
7/16/2009 0.21 4381.60 4380.30 48.40
7/16/2009 0.21 4381.60 4380.40 48.38
7/17/2009 0.21 4381.60 4380.40 48.36
7/17/2009 0.21 4381.70 4380.40 48.34
7/18/2009 0.21 4381.70 4380.40 48.32
7/18/2009 0.22 4381.70 4380.40 48.30
7/19/2009 0.22 4381.70 4380.40 48.28
7/19/2009 0.22 4381.70 4380.40 48.26
7/20/2009 0.22 4381.80 4380.50 48.24
7/21/2009 0.22 4381.80 4380.50 48.22
3 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
7/21/2009 0.22 4381.80 4380.50 48.20
7/22/2009 0.23 4381.80 4380.50 48.18
7/22/2009 0.23 4381.80 4380.50 48.16
7/23/2009 0.23 4381.90 4380.50 48.14
7/23/2009 0.23 4381.90 4380.50 48.12
7/24/2009 0.23 4381.90 4380.60 48.10
7/24/2009 0.23 4381.90 4380.60 48.09
7/25/2009 0.23 4381.90 4380.60 48.07
7/26/2009 0.24 4382.00 4380.60 48.05
7/26/2009 0.24 4382.00 4380.60 48.03
7/27/2009 0.24 4382.00 4380.60 48.01
7/27/2009 0.24 4382.00 4380.70 47.99
7/28/2009 0.24 4382.00 4380.70 47.97
7/28/2009 0.24 4382.10 4380.70 47.95
7/29/2009 0.24 4382.10 4380.70 47.93
7/29/2009 0.25 4382.10 4380.70 47.91
7/30/2009 0.25 4382.10 4380.70 47.89
7/31/2009 0.25 4382.10 4380.70 47.87
7/31/2009 0.25 4382.10 4380.80 47.85
8/1/2009 0.25 4382.20 4380.80 47.83
8/1/2009 0.25 4382.20 4380.80 47.81
8/2/2009 0.26 4382.20 4380.80 47.79
8/2/2009 0.26 4382.20 4380.80 47.76
8/3/2009 0.26 4382.30 4380.80 47.74
8/3/2009 0.26 4382.30 4380.90 47.72
8/4/2009 0.26 4382.30 4380.90 47.69
8/5/2009 0.26 4382.30 4380.90 47.67
8/5/2009 0.26 4382.40 4380.90 47.65
8/6/2009 0.27 4382.40 4380.90 47.62
8/6/2009 0.27 4382.40 4380.90 47.60
8/7/2009 0.27 4382.40 4380.90 47.58
8/7/2009 0.27 4382.40 4381.00 47.56
8/8/2009 0.27 4382.50 4381.00 47.53
8/8/2009 0.27 4382.50 4381.00 47.51
8/9/2009 0.28 4382.50 4381.00 47.49
8/10/2009 0.28 4382.50 4381.00 47.46
8/10/2009 0.28 4382.60 4381.00 47.44
8/11/2009 0.28 4382.60 4381.00 47.42
8/11/2009 0.28 4382.60 4381.10 47.39
8/12/2009 0.28 4382.60 4381.10 47.37
8/12/2009 0.28 4382.70 4381.10 47.35
8/13/2009 0.29 4382.70 4381.10 47.33
8/13/2009 0.29 4382.70 4381.10 47.30
8/14/2009 0.29 4382.70 4381.10 47.28
8/15/2009 0.29 4382.70 4381.20 47.26
8/15/2009 0.29 4382.80 4381.20 47.23
8/16/2009 0.29 4382.80 4381.20 47.21
8/16/2009 0.30 4382.80 4381.20 47.19
8/17/2009 0.30 4382.80 4381.20 47.17
4 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
8/17/2009 0.30 4382.90 4381.20 47.14
8/18/2009 0.30 4382.90 4381.20 47.12
8/18/2009 0.30 4382.90 4381.30 47.10
8/19/2009 0.30 4382.90 4381.30 47.08
8/20/2009 0.30 4382.90 4381.30 47.05
8/20/2009 0.31 4383.00 4381.30 47.03
8/21/2009 0.31 4383.00 4381.30 47.01
8/21/2009 0.31 4383.00 4381.30 46.99
8/22/2009 0.31 4383.00 4381.40 46.96
8/22/2009 0.31 4383.10 4381.40 46.94
8/23/2009 0.31 4383.10 4381.40 46.92
8/23/2009 0.31 4383.10 4381.40 46.90
8/24/2009 0.32 4383.10 4381.40 46.87
8/25/2009 0.32 4383.20 4381.40 46.85
8/25/2009 0.32 4383.20 4381.40 46.83
8/26/2009 0.32 4383.20 4381.50 46.81
8/26/2009 0.32 4383.20 4381.50 46.78
8/27/2009 0.32 4383.20 4381.50 46.76
8/27/2009 0.33 4383.30 4381.50 46.74
8/28/2009 0.33 4383.30 4381.50 46.72
8/28/2009 0.33 4383.30 4381.50 46.69
8/29/2009 0.33 4383.30 4381.50 46.67
8/30/2009 0.33 4383.40 4381.60 46.65
8/30/2009 0.33 4383.40 4381.60 46.63
8/31/2009 0.33 4383.40 4381.60 46.60
8/31/2009 0.34 4383.40 4381.60 46.58
9/1/2009 0.34 4383.40 4381.60 46.56
9/1/2009 0.34 4383.50 4381.60 46.54
9/2/2009 0.34 4383.50 4381.70 46.51
9/2/2009 0.34 4383.50 4381.70 46.49
9/3/2009 0.34 4383.50 4381.70 46.47
9/4/2009 0.35 4383.60 4381.70 46.45
9/4/2009 0.35 4383.60 4381.70 46.42
9/5/2009 0.35 4383.60 4381.70 46.40
9/5/2009 0.35 4383.60 4381.70 46.38
9/6/2009 0.35 4383.60 4381.80 46.36
9/6/2009 0.35 4383.70 4381.80 46.34
9/7/2009 0.35 4383.70 4381.80 46.31
9/7/2009 0.36 4383.70 4381.80 46.29
9/8/2009 0.36 4383.70 4381.80 46.27
9/9/2009 0.36 4383.80 4381.80 46.25
9/9/2009 0.36 4383.80 4381.90 46.22
9/10/2009 0.36 4383.80 4381.90 46.20
9/10/2009 0.36 4383.80 4381.90 46.18
9/11/2009 0.37 4383.80 4381.90 46.16
9/11/2009 0.37 4383.90 4381.90 46.13
9/12/2009 0.37 4383.90 4381.90 46.11
9/12/2009 0.37 4383.90 4381.90 46.09
9/13/2009 0.37 4383.90 4382.00 46.07
5 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
9/14/2009 0.37 4384.00 4382.00 46.05
9/14/2009 0.37 4384.00 4382.00 46.02
9/15/2009 0.38 4384.00 4382.00 46.00
9/15/2009 0.38 4384.00 4382.00 45.98
9/16/2009 0.38 4384.00 4382.00 45.96
9/16/2009 0.38 4384.10 4382.00 45.94
9/17/2009 0.38 4384.10 4382.10 45.91
9/17/2009 0.38 4384.10 4382.10 45.89
9/18/2009 0.38 4384.10 4382.10 45.87
9/19/2009 0.39 4384.20 4382.10 45.85
9/19/2009 0.39 4384.20 4382.10 45.83
9/20/2009 0.39 4384.20 4382.10 45.80
9/20/2009 0.39 4384.20 4382.20 45.78
9/21/2009 0.39 4384.20 4382.20 45.76
9/21/2009 0.39 4384.30 4382.20 45.74
9/22/2009 0.40 4384.30 4382.20 45.72
9/22/2009 0.40 4384.30 4382.20 45.69
9/23/2009 0.40 4384.30 4382.20 45.67
9/24/2009 0.40 4384.40 4382.20 45.65
9/24/2009 0.40 4384.40 4382.30 45.63
9/25/2009 0.40 4384.40 4382.30 45.61
9/25/2009 0.40 4384.40 4382.30 45.59
9/26/2009 0.41 4384.40 4382.30 45.56
9/26/2009 0.41 4384.50 4382.30 45.54
9/27/2009 0.41 4384.50 4382.30 45.52
9/27/2009 0.41 4384.50 4382.40 45.50
9/28/2009 0.41 4384.50 4382.40 45.48
9/29/2009 0.41 4384.50 4382.40 45.45
9/29/2009 0.42 4384.60 4382.40 45.43
9/30/2009 0.42 4384.60 4382.40 45.41
9/30/2009 0.42 4384.60 4382.40 45.39
10/1/2009 0.42 4384.60 4382.40 45.37
10/1/2009 0.42 4384.70 4382.50 45.35
10/2/2009 0.42 4384.70 4382.50 45.32
10/2/2009 0.42 4384.70 4382.50 45.30
10/3/2009 0.43 4384.70 4382.50 45.28
10/4/2009 0.43 4384.70 4382.50 45.26
10/4/2009 0.43 4384.80 4382.50 45.23
10/5/2009 0.43 4384.80 4382.50 45.21
10/5/2009 0.43 4384.80 4382.60 45.19
10/6/2009 0.43 4384.80 4382.60 45.17
10/6/2009 0.43 4384.90 4382.60 45.14
10/7/2009 0.44 4384.90 4382.60 45.12
10/7/2009 0.44 4384.90 4382.60 45.10
10/8/2009 0.44 4384.90 4382.60 45.08
10/9/2009 0.44 4384.90 4382.70 45.05
10/9/2009 0.44 4385.00 4382.70 45.03
10/10/2009 0.44 4385.00 4382.70 45.01
10/10/2009 0.45 4385.00 4382.70 44.99
6 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
10/11/2009 0.45 4385.00 4382.70 44.96
10/11/2009 0.45 4385.10 4382.70 44.94
10/12/2009 0.45 4385.10 4382.70 44.92
10/12/2009 0.45 4385.10 4382.80 44.90
10/13/2009 0.45 4385.10 4382.80 44.88
10/14/2009 0.45 4385.10 4382.80 44.85
10/14/2009 0.46 4385.20 4382.80 44.83
10/15/2009 0.46 4385.20 4382.80 44.81
10/15/2009 0.46 4385.20 4382.80 44.79
10/16/2009 0.46 4385.20 4382.80 44.76
10/16/2009 0.46 4385.30 4382.90 44.74
10/17/2009 0.46 4385.30 4382.90 44.72
10/17/2009 0.47 4385.30 4382.90 44.70
10/18/2009 0.47 4385.30 4382.90 44.68
10/19/2009 0.47 4385.30 4382.90 44.65
10/19/2009 0.47 4385.40 4382.90 44.63
10/20/2009 0.47 4385.40 4383.00 44.61
10/20/2009 0.47 4385.40 4383.00 44.59
10/21/2009 0.47 4385.40 4383.00 44.57
10/21/2009 0.48 4385.50 4383.00 44.54
10/22/2009 0.48 4385.50 4383.00 44.52
10/22/2009 0.48 4385.50 4383.00 44.50
10/23/2009 0.48 4385.50 4383.00 44.48
10/24/2009 0.48 4385.50 4383.10 44.46
10/24/2009 0.48 4385.60 4383.10 44.43
10/25/2009 0.49 4385.60 4383.10 44.41
10/25/2009 0.49 4385.60 4383.10 44.39
10/26/2009 0.49 4385.60 4383.10 44.37
10/26/2009 0.49 4385.70 4383.10 44.35
10/27/2009 0.49 4385.70 4383.20 44.32
10/27/2009 0.49 4385.70 4383.20 44.30
10/28/2009 0.49 4385.70 4383.20 44.28
10/29/2009 0.50 4385.70 4383.20 44.26
10/29/2009 0.50 4385.80 4383.20 44.24
10/30/2009 0.50 4385.80 4383.20 44.21
10/30/2009 0.50 4385.80 4383.20 44.19
10/31/2009 0.50 4385.80 4383.30 44.17
10/31/2009 0.50 4385.90 4383.30 44.15
11/1/2009 0.50 4385.90 4383.30 44.13
11/1/2009 0.51 4385.90 4383.30 44.10
11/2/2009 0.51 4385.90 4383.30 44.08
11/3/2009 0.51 4385.90 4383.30 44.06
11/3/2009 0.51 4386.00 4383.30 44.04
11/4/2009 0.51 4386.00 4383.40 44.02
11/4/2009 0.51 4386.00 4383.40 43.99
11/5/2009 0.52 4386.00 4383.40 43.97
11/5/2009 0.52 4386.10 4383.40 43.95
11/6/2009 0.52 4386.10 4383.40 43.93
11/6/2009 0.52 4386.10 4383.40 43.90
7 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
11/7/2009 0.52 4386.10 4383.50 43.88
11/8/2009 0.52 4386.10 4383.50 43.86
11/8/2009 0.52 4386.20 4383.50 43.84
11/9/2009 0.53 4386.20 4383.50 43.82
11/9/2009 0.53 4386.20 4383.50 43.79
11/10/2009 0.53 4386.20 4383.50 43.77
11/10/2009 0.53 4386.30 4383.50 43.75
11/11/2009 0.53 4386.30 4383.60 43.73
11/11/2009 0.53 4386.30 4383.60 43.71
11/12/2009 0.54 4386.30 4383.60 43.68
11/13/2009 0.54 4386.30 4383.60 43.66
11/13/2009 0.54 4386.40 4383.60 43.64
11/14/2009 0.54 4386.40 4383.60 43.62
11/14/2009 0.54 4386.40 4383.70 43.60
11/15/2009 0.54 4386.40 4383.70 43.57
11/15/2009 0.54 4386.40 4383.70 43.55
11/16/2009 0.55 4386.50 4383.70 43.53
11/16/2009 0.55 4386.50 4383.70 43.51
11/17/2009 0.55 4386.50 4383.70 43.49
11/18/2009 0.55 4386.50 4383.70 43.46
11/18/2009 0.55 4386.60 4383.80 43.44
11/19/2009 0.55 4386.60 4383.80 43.42
11/19/2009 0.56 4386.60 4383.80 43.40
11/20/2009 0.56 4386.60 4383.80 43.38
11/20/2009 0.56 4386.60 4383.80 43.35
11/21/2009 0.56 4386.70 4383.80 43.33
11/21/2009 0.56 4386.70 4383.80 43.31
11/22/2009 0.56 4386.70 4383.90 43.29
11/23/2009 0.56 4386.70 4383.90 43.27
11/23/2009 0.57 4386.80 4383.90 43.24
11/24/2009 0.57 4386.80 4383.90 43.22
11/24/2009 0.57 4386.80 4383.90 43.20
11/25/2009 0.57 4386.80 4383.90 43.18
11/25/2009 0.57 4386.80 4384.00 43.16
11/26/2009 0.57 4386.90 4384.00 43.13
11/26/2009 0.57 4386.90 4384.00 43.11
11/27/2009 0.58 4386.90 4384.00 43.09
11/28/2009 0.58 4386.90 4384.00 43.07
11/28/2009 0.58 4387.00 4384.00 43.05
11/29/2009 0.58 4387.00 4384.00 43.03
11/29/2009 0.58 4387.00 4384.10 43.00
11/30/2009 0.58 4387.00 4384.10 42.98
11/30/2009 0.59 4387.00 4384.10 42.96
12/1/2009 0.59 4387.10 4384.10 42.94
12/1/2009 0.59 4387.10 4384.10 42.92
12/2/2009 0.59 4387.10 4384.10 42.89
12/3/2009 0.59 4387.10 4384.20 42.87
12/3/2009 0.59 4387.20 4384.20 42.84
12/4/2009 0.59 4387.20 4384.20 42.82
8 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
12/4/2009 0.60 4387.20 4384.20 42.80
12/5/2009 0.60 4387.20 4384.20 42.77
12/5/2009 0.60 4387.20 4384.20 42.75
12/6/2009 0.60 4387.30 4384.20 42.73
12/6/2009 0.60 4387.30 4384.30 42.70
12/7/2009 0.60 4387.30 4384.30 42.68
12/8/2009 0.61 4387.30 4384.30 42.66
12/8/2009 0.61 4387.40 4384.30 42.63
12/9/2009 0.61 4387.40 4384.30 42.61
12/9/2009 0.61 4387.40 4384.30 42.59
12/10/2009 0.61 4387.40 4384.30 42.56
12/10/2009 0.61 4387.50 4384.40 42.54
12/11/2009 0.61 4387.50 4384.40 42.52
12/11/2009 0.62 4387.50 4384.40 42.49
12/12/2009 0.62 4387.50 4384.40 42.47
12/13/2009 0.62 4387.60 4384.40 42.45
12/13/2009 0.62 4387.60 4384.40 42.42
12/14/2009 0.62 4387.60 4384.50 42.40
12/14/2009 0.62 4387.60 4384.50 42.38
12/15/2009 0.63 4387.60 4384.50 42.35
12/15/2009 0.63 4387.70 4384.50 42.33
12/16/2009 0.63 4387.70 4384.50 42.31
12/16/2009 0.63 4387.70 4384.50 42.28
12/17/2009 0.63 4387.70 4384.50 42.26
12/18/2009 0.63 4387.80 4384.60 42.24
12/18/2009 0.63 4387.80 4384.60 42.21
12/19/2009 0.64 4387.80 4384.60 42.19
12/19/2009 0.64 4387.80 4384.60 42.17
12/20/2009 0.64 4387.90 4384.60 42.14
12/20/2009 0.64 4387.90 4384.60 42.12
12/21/2009 0.64 4387.90 4384.60 42.10
12/21/2009 0.64 4387.90 4384.70 42.07
12/22/2009 0.64 4387.90 4384.70 42.05
12/23/2009 0.65 4388.00 4384.70 42.03
12/23/2009 0.65 4388.00 4384.70 42.00
12/24/2009 0.65 4388.00 4384.70 41.98
12/24/2009 0.65 4388.00 4384.70 41.96
12/25/2009 0.65 4388.10 4384.80 41.93
12/25/2009 0.65 4388.10 4384.80 41.91
12/26/2009 0.66 4388.10 4384.80 41.89
12/26/2009 0.66 4388.10 4384.80 41.86
12/27/2009 0.66 4388.20 4384.80 41.84
12/28/2009 0.66 4388.20 4384.80 41.82
12/28/2009 0.66 4388.20 4384.80 41.80
12/29/2009 0.66 4388.20 4384.90 41.77
12/29/2009 0.66 4388.30 4384.90 41.75
12/30/2009 0.67 4388.30 4384.90 41.73
12/30/2009 0.67 4388.30 4384.90 41.70
12/31/2009 0.67 4388.30 4384.90 41.68
9 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
12/31/2009 0.67 4388.30 4384.90 41.66
1/1/2010 0.67 4388.40 4385.00 41.63
1/2/2010 0.67 4388.40 4385.00 41.61
1/2/2010 0.68 4388.40 4385.00 41.58
1/3/2010 0.68 4388.40 4385.00 41.56
1/3/2010 0.68 4388.50 4385.00 41.53
1/4/2010 0.68 4388.50 4385.00 41.51
1/4/2010 0.68 4388.50 4385.00 41.49
1/5/2010 0.68 4388.50 4385.10 41.46
1/5/2010 0.68 4388.60 4385.10 41.44
1/6/2010 0.69 4388.60 4385.10 41.41
1/7/2010 0.69 4388.60 4385.10 41.39
1/7/2010 0.69 4388.60 4385.10 41.36
1/8/2010 0.69 4388.70 4385.10 41.34
1/8/2010 0.69 4388.70 4385.10 41.31
1/9/2010 0.69 4388.70 4385.20 41.29
1/9/2010 0.70 4388.70 4385.20 41.26
1/10/2010 0.70 4388.80 4385.20 41.24
1/10/2010 0.70 4388.80 4385.20 41.21
1/11/2010 0.70 4388.80 4385.20 41.19
1/12/2010 0.70 4388.80 4385.20 41.16
1/12/2010 0.70 4388.90 4385.30 41.14
1/13/2010 0.70 4388.90 4385.30 41.12
1/13/2010 0.71 4388.90 4385.30 41.09
1/14/2010 0.71 4388.90 4385.30 41.07
1/14/2010 0.71 4389.00 4385.30 41.04
1/15/2010 0.71 4389.00 4385.30 41.02
1/15/2010 0.71 4389.00 4385.30 40.99
1/16/2010 0.71 4389.00 4385.40 40.97
1/17/2010 0.71 4389.10 4385.40 40.94
1/17/2010 0.72 4389.10 4385.40 40.92
1/18/2010 0.72 4389.10 4385.40 40.89
1/18/2010 0.72 4389.10 4385.40 40.87
1/19/2010 0.72 4389.20 4385.40 40.85
1/19/2010 0.72 4389.20 4385.50 40.82
1/20/2010 0.72 4389.20 4385.50 40.80
1/20/2010 0.73 4389.20 4385.50 40.77
1/21/2010 0.73 4389.30 4385.50 40.75
1/22/2010 0.73 4389.30 4385.50 40.72
1/22/2010 0.73 4389.30 4385.50 40.70
1/23/2010 0.73 4389.30 4385.50 40.67
1/23/2010 0.73 4389.40 4385.60 40.65
1/24/2010 0.73 4389.40 4385.60 40.63
1/24/2010 0.74 4389.40 4385.60 40.60
1/25/2010 0.74 4389.40 4385.60 40.58
1/25/2010 0.74 4389.40 4385.60 40.55
1/26/2010 0.74 4389.50 4385.60 40.53
1/27/2010 0.74 4389.50 4385.60 40.50
1/27/2010 0.74 4389.50 4385.70 40.48
10 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
1/28/2010 0.75 4389.50 4385.70 40.45
1/28/2010 0.75 4389.60 4385.70 40.43
1/29/2010 0.75 4389.60 4385.70 40.41
1/29/2010 0.75 4389.60 4385.70 40.38
1/30/2010 0.75 4389.60 4385.70 40.36
1/30/2010 0.75 4389.70 4385.80 40.33
1/31/2010 0.75 4389.70 4385.80 40.31
2/1/2010 0.76 4389.70 4385.80 40.28
2/1/2010 0.76 4389.70 4385.80 40.26
2/2/2010 0.76 4389.80 4385.80 40.23
2/2/2010 0.76 4389.80 4385.80 40.21
2/3/2010 0.76 4389.80 4385.80 40.19
2/3/2010 0.76 4389.80 4385.90 40.16
2/4/2010 0.77 4389.90 4385.90 40.14
2/4/2010 0.77 4389.90 4385.90 40.11
2/5/2010 0.77 4389.90 4385.90 40.09
2/6/2010 0.77 4389.90 4385.90 40.06
2/6/2010 0.77 4390.00 4385.90 40.04
2/7/2010 0.77 4390.00 4386.00 40.01
2/7/2010 0.77 4390.00 4386.00 39.99
2/8/2010 0.78 4390.00 4386.00 39.98
2/8/2010 0.78 4390.00 4386.00 39.96
2/9/2010 0.78 4390.10 4386.00 39.95
2/9/2010 0.78 4390.10 4386.00 39.93
2/10/2010 0.78 4390.10 4386.00 39.91
2/11/2010 0.78 4390.10 4386.10 39.90
2/11/2010 0.78 4390.10 4386.10 39.88
2/12/2010 0.79 4390.10 4386.10 39.87
2/12/2010 0.79 4390.10 4386.10 39.85
2/13/2010 0.79 4390.20 4386.10 39.83
2/13/2010 0.79 4390.20 4386.10 39.82
2/14/2010 0.79 4390.20 4386.10 39.80
2/14/2010 0.79 4390.20 4386.20 39.79
2/15/2010 0.80 4390.20 4386.20 39.77
2/16/2010 0.80 4390.20 4386.20 39.76
2/16/2010 0.80 4390.30 4386.20 39.74
2/17/2010 0.80 4390.30 4386.20 39.72
2/17/2010 0.80 4390.30 4386.20 39.71
2/18/2010 0.80 4390.30 4386.30 39.69
2/18/2010 0.80 4390.30 4386.30 39.68
2/19/2010 0.81 4390.30 4386.30 39.66
2/19/2010 0.81 4390.40 4386.30 39.64
2/20/2010 0.81 4390.40 4386.30 39.63
2/21/2010 0.81 4390.40 4386.30 39.61
2/21/2010 0.81 4390.40 4386.30 39.60
2/22/2010 0.81 4390.40 4386.40 39.58
2/22/2010 0.82 4390.40 4386.40 39.57
2/23/2010 0.82 4390.50 4386.40 39.55
2/23/2010 0.82 4390.50 4386.40 39.53
11 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
2/24/2010 0.82 4390.50 4386.40 39.52
2/24/2010 0.82 4390.50 4386.40 39.50
2/25/2010 0.82 4390.50 4386.40 39.49
2/26/2010 0.82 4390.50 4386.50 39.47
2/26/2010 0.83 4390.50 4386.50 39.45
2/27/2010 0.83 4390.60 4386.50 39.44
2/27/2010 0.83 4390.60 4386.50 39.42
2/28/2010 0.83 4390.60 4386.50 39.41
2/28/2010 0.83 4390.60 4386.50 39.39
3/1/2010 0.83 4390.60 4386.60 39.38
3/1/2010 0.83 4390.60 4386.60 39.36
3/2/2010 0.84 4390.70 4386.60 39.34
3/3/2010 0.84 4390.70 4386.60 39.33
3/3/2010 0.84 4390.70 4386.60 39.31
3/4/2010 0.84 4390.70 4386.60 39.29
3/4/2010 0.84 4390.70 4386.60 39.27
3/5/2010 0.84 4390.70 4386.70 39.26
3/5/2010 0.85 4390.80 4386.70 39.24
3/6/2010 0.85 4390.80 4386.70 39.22
3/6/2010 0.85 4390.80 4386.70 39.21
3/7/2010 0.85 4390.80 4386.70 39.19
3/8/2010 0.85 4390.80 4386.70 39.17
3/8/2010 0.85 4390.80 4386.80 39.16
3/9/2010 0.85 4390.90 4386.80 39.14
3/9/2010 0.86 4390.90 4386.80 39.12
3/10/2010 0.86 4390.90 4386.80 39.11
3/10/2010 0.86 4390.90 4386.80 39.09
3/11/2010 0.86 4390.90 4386.80 39.07
3/11/2010 0.86 4390.90 4386.80 39.06
3/12/2010 0.86 4391.00 4386.90 39.04
3/13/2010 0.87 4391.00 4386.90 39.02
3/13/2010 0.87 4391.00 4386.90 39.01
3/14/2010 0.87 4391.00 4386.90 38.99
3/14/2010 0.87 4391.00 4386.90 38.97
3/15/2010 0.87 4391.00 4386.90 38.96
3/15/2010 0.87 4391.10 4386.90 38.94
3/16/2010 0.87 4391.10 4387.00 38.92
3/16/2010 0.88 4391.10 4387.00 38.91
3/17/2010 0.88 4391.10 4387.00 38.89
3/18/2010 0.88 4391.10 4387.00 38.87
3/18/2010 0.88 4391.10 4387.00 38.86
3/19/2010 0.88 4391.20 4387.00 38.84
3/19/2010 0.88 4391.20 4387.10 38.82
3/20/2010 0.89 4391.20 4387.10 38.81
3/20/2010 0.89 4391.20 4387.10 38.79
3/21/2010 0.89 4391.20 4387.10 38.77
3/21/2010 0.89 4391.20 4387.10 38.76
3/22/2010 0.89 4391.30 4387.10 38.74
3/23/2010 0.89 4391.30 4387.10 38.72
12 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
3/23/2010 0.89 4391.30 4387.20 38.71
3/24/2010 0.90 4391.30 4387.20 38.69
3/24/2010 0.90 4391.30 4387.20 38.67
3/25/2010 0.90 4391.30 4387.20 38.66
3/25/2010 0.90 4391.40 4387.20 38.64
3/26/2010 0.90 4391.40 4387.20 38.62
3/26/2010 0.90 4391.40 4387.30 38.61
3/27/2010 0.90 4391.40 4387.30 38.59
3/28/2010 0.91 4391.40 4387.30 38.57
3/28/2010 0.91 4391.40 4387.30 38.56
3/29/2010 0.91 4391.50 4387.30 38.54
3/29/2010 0.91 4391.50 4387.30 38.52
3/30/2010 0.91 4391.50 4387.30 38.51
3/30/2010 0.91 4391.50 4387.40 38.49
3/31/2010 0.92 4391.50 4387.40 38.47
3/31/2010 0.92 4391.50 4387.40 38.46
4/1/2010 0.92 4391.60 4387.40 38.44
4/2/2010 0.92 4391.60 4387.40 38.42
4/2/2010 0.92 4391.60 4387.40 38.41
4/3/2010 0.92 4391.60 4387.40 38.40
4/3/2010 0.92 4391.60 4387.50 38.38
4/4/2010 0.93 4391.60 4387.50 38.37
4/4/2010 0.93 4391.60 4387.50 38.35
4/5/2010 0.93 4391.70 4387.50 38.34
4/5/2010 0.93 4391.70 4387.50 38.33
4/6/2010 0.93 4391.70 4387.50 38.31
4/7/2010 0.93 4391.70 4387.60 38.30
4/7/2010 0.94 4391.70 4387.60 38.28
4/8/2010 0.94 4391.70 4387.60 38.27
4/8/2010 0.94 4391.70 4387.60 38.26
4/9/2010 0.94 4391.80 4387.60 38.24
4/9/2010 0.94 4391.80 4387.60 38.23
4/10/2010 0.94 4391.80 4387.60 38.21
4/10/2010 0.94 4391.80 4387.70 38.20
4/11/2010 0.95 4391.80 4387.70 38.18
4/12/2010 0.95 4391.80 4387.70 38.17
4/12/2010 0.95 4391.80 4387.70 38.16
4/13/2010 0.95 4391.90 4387.70 38.14
4/13/2010 0.95 4391.90 4387.70 38.13
4/14/2010 0.95 4391.90 4387.80 38.11
4/14/2010 0.96 4391.90 4387.80 38.10
4/15/2010 0.96 4391.90 4387.80 38.09
4/15/2010 0.96 4391.90 4387.80 38.07
4/16/2010 0.96 4391.90 4387.80 38.06
4/17/2010 0.96 4392.00 4387.80 38.04
4/17/2010 0.96 4392.00 4387.80 38.03
4/18/2010 0.96 4392.00 4387.90 38.02
4/18/2010 0.97 4392.00 4387.90 38.00
4/19/2010 0.97 4392.00 4387.90 37.99
13 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
4/19/2010 0.97 4392.00 4387.90 37.97
4/20/2010 0.97 4392.00 4387.90 37.96
4/20/2010 0.97 4392.10 4387.90 37.95
4/21/2010 0.97 4392.10 4387.90 37.93
4/22/2010 0.97 4392.10 4388.00 37.92
4/22/2010 0.98 4392.10 4388.00 37.90
4/23/2010 0.98 4392.10 4388.00 37.89
4/23/2010 0.98 4392.10 4388.00 37.88
4/24/2010 0.98 4392.10 4388.00 37.86
4/24/2010 0.98 4392.20 4388.00 37.85
4/25/2010 0.98 4392.20 4388.10 37.83
4/25/2010 0.99 4392.20 4388.10 37.82
4/26/2010 0.99 4392.20 4388.10 37.81
4/27/2010 0.99 4392.20 4388.10 37.79
4/27/2010 0.99 4392.20 4388.10 37.78
4/28/2010 0.99 4392.20 4388.10 37.76
4/28/2010 0.99 4392.30 4388.10 37.75
4/29/2010 0.99 4392.30 4388.20 37.74
4/29/2010 1.00 4392.30 4388.20 37.72
4/30/2010 1.00 4392.30 4388.20 37.71
4/30/2010 1.00 4392.30 4388.20 37.69
5/1/2010 1.00 4392.30 4388.20 37.68
5/2/2010 1.00 4392.30 4388.20 37.67
5/2/2010 1.00 4392.30 4388.30 37.65
5/3/2010 1.01 4392.40 4388.30 37.64
5/3/2010 1.01 4392.40 4388.30 37.62
5/4/2010 1.01 4392.40 4388.30 37.61
5/4/2010 1.01 4392.40 4388.30 37.60
5/5/2010 1.01 4392.40 4388.30 37.58
5/5/2010 1.01 4392.40 4388.30 37.57
5/6/2010 1.01 4392.40 4388.40 37.56
5/7/2010 1.02 4392.50 4388.40 37.54
5/7/2010 1.02 4392.50 4388.40 37.53
5/8/2010 1.02 4392.50 4388.40 37.52
5/8/2010 1.02 4392.50 4388.40 37.50
5/9/2010 1.02 4392.50 4388.40 37.49
5/9/2010 1.02 4392.50 4388.40 37.48
5/10/2010 1.03 4392.50 4388.50 37.46
5/10/2010 1.03 4392.60 4388.50 37.45
5/11/2010 1.03 4392.60 4388.50 37.44
5/12/2010 1.03 4392.60 4388.50 37.42
5/12/2010 1.03 4392.60 4388.50 37.41
5/13/2010 1.03 4392.60 4388.50 37.39
5/13/2010 1.03 4392.60 4388.60 37.38
5/14/2010 1.04 4392.60 4388.60 37.37
5/14/2010 1.04 4392.60 4388.60 37.35
5/15/2010 1.04 4392.70 4388.60 37.34
5/15/2010 1.04 4392.70 4388.60 37.33
5/16/2010 1.04 4392.70 4388.60 37.31
14 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
5/17/2010 1.04 4392.70 4388.60 37.30
5/17/2010 1.04 4392.70 4388.70 37.29
5/18/2010 1.05 4392.70 4388.70 37.27
5/18/2010 1.05 4392.70 4388.70 37.26
5/19/2010 1.05 4392.80 4388.70 37.25
5/19/2010 1.05 4392.80 4388.70 37.23
5/20/2010 1.05 4392.80 4388.70 37.22
5/20/2010 1.05 4392.80 4388.70 37.21
5/21/2010 1.06 4392.80 4388.80 37.19
5/22/2010 1.06 4392.80 4388.80 37.18
5/22/2010 1.06 4392.80 4388.80 37.17
5/23/2010 1.06 4392.80 4388.80 37.15
5/23/2010 1.06 4392.90 4388.80 37.14
5/24/2010 1.06 4392.90 4388.80 37.13
5/24/2010 1.06 4392.90 4388.90 37.11
5/25/2010 1.07 4392.90 4388.90 37.10
5/25/2010 1.07 4392.90 4388.90 37.08
5/26/2010 1.07 4392.90 4388.90 37.07
5/27/2010 1.07 4392.90 4388.90 37.06
5/27/2010 1.07 4393.00 4388.90 37.04
5/28/2010 1.07 4393.00 4388.90 37.03
5/28/2010 1.08 4393.00 4389.00 37.02
5/29/2010 1.08 4393.00 4389.00 37.00
5/29/2010 1.08 4393.00 4389.00 36.99
5/30/2010 1.08 4393.00 4389.00 36.98
5/30/2010 1.08 4393.00 4389.00 36.96
5/31/2010 1.08 4393.10 4389.00 36.95
6/1/2010 1.08 4393.10 4389.10 36.94
6/1/2010 1.09 4393.10 4389.10 36.93
6/2/2010 1.09 4393.10 4389.10 36.91
6/2/2010 1.09 4393.10 4389.10 36.90
6/3/2010 1.09 4393.10 4389.10 36.89
6/3/2010 1.09 4393.10 4389.10 36.88
6/4/2010 1.09 4393.10 4389.10 36.87
6/4/2010 1.10 4393.10 4389.20 36.86
6/5/2010 1.10 4393.20 4389.20 36.84
6/6/2010 1.10 4393.20 4389.20 36.83
6/6/2010 1.10 4393.20 4389.20 36.82
6/7/2010 1.10 4393.20 4389.20 36.81
6/7/2010 1.10 4393.20 4389.20 36.80
6/8/2010 1.10 4393.20 4389.20 36.79
6/8/2010 1.11 4393.20 4389.30 36.77
6/9/2010 1.11 4393.20 4389.30 36.76
6/9/2010 1.11 4393.30 4389.30 36.75
6/10/2010 1.11 4393.30 4389.30 36.74
6/11/2010 1.11 4393.30 4389.30 36.73
6/11/2010 1.11 4393.30 4389.30 36.72
6/12/2010 1.11 4393.30 4389.40 36.70
6/12/2010 1.12 4393.30 4389.40 36.69
15 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
6/13/2010 1.12 4393.30 4389.40 36.68
6/13/2010 1.12 4393.30 4389.40 36.67
6/14/2010 1.12 4393.30 4389.40 36.66
6/14/2010 1.12 4393.40 4389.40 36.65
6/15/2010 1.12 4393.40 4389.40 36.63
6/16/2010 1.13 4393.40 4389.50 36.62
6/16/2010 1.13 4393.40 4389.50 36.61
6/17/2010 1.13 4393.40 4389.50 36.60
6/17/2010 1.13 4393.40 4389.50 36.59
6/18/2010 1.13 4393.40 4389.50 36.58
6/18/2010 1.13 4393.40 4389.50 36.57
6/19/2010 1.13 4393.40 4389.60 36.55
6/19/2010 1.14 4393.50 4389.60 36.54
6/20/2010 1.14 4393.50 4389.60 36.53
6/21/2010 1.14 4393.50 4389.60 36.52
6/21/2010 1.14 4393.50 4389.60 36.51
6/22/2010 1.14 4393.50 4389.60 36.50
6/22/2010 1.14 4393.50 4389.60 36.48
6/23/2010 1.15 4393.50 4389.70 36.47
6/23/2010 1.15 4393.50 4389.70 36.46
6/24/2010 1.15 4393.60 4389.70 36.45
6/24/2010 1.15 4393.60 4389.70 36.44
6/25/2010 1.15 4393.60 4389.70 36.43
6/26/2010 1.15 4393.60 4389.70 36.42
6/26/2010 1.15 4393.60 4389.70 36.40
6/27/2010 1.16 4393.60 4389.80 36.39
6/27/2010 1.16 4393.60 4389.80 36.38
6/28/2010 1.16 4393.60 4389.80 36.37
6/28/2010 1.16 4393.60 4389.80 36.36
6/29/2010 1.16 4393.70 4389.80 36.35
6/29/2010 1.16 4393.70 4389.80 36.33
6/30/2010 1.17 4393.70 4389.90 36.32
7/1/2010 1.17 4393.70 4389.90 36.31
7/1/2010 1.17 4393.70 4389.90 36.30
7/2/2010 1.17 4393.70 4389.90 36.30
7/2/2010 1.17 4393.70 4389.90 36.29
7/3/2010 1.17 4393.70 4389.90 36.28
7/3/2010 1.17 4393.70 4389.90 36.27
7/4/2010 1.18 4393.70 4390.00 36.26
7/4/2010 1.18 4393.70 4390.00 36.26
7/5/2010 1.18 4393.80 4390.00 36.25
7/6/2010 1.18 4393.80 4390.00 36.24
7/6/2010 1.18 4393.80 4390.00 36.23
7/7/2010 1.18 4393.80 4390.00 36.23
7/7/2010 1.18 4393.80 4390.00 36.22
7/8/2010 1.19 4393.80 4390.00 36.21
7/8/2010 1.19 4393.80 4390.10 36.20
7/9/2010 1.19 4393.80 4390.10 36.19
7/9/2010 1.19 4393.80 4390.10 36.19
16 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
7/10/2010 1.19 4393.80 4390.10 36.18
7/11/2010 1.19 4393.80 4390.10 36.17
7/11/2010 1.20 4393.80 4390.10 36.16
7/12/2010 1.20 4393.80 4390.10 36.16
7/12/2010 1.20 4393.90 4390.10 36.15
7/13/2010 1.20 4393.90 4390.10 36.14
7/13/2010 1.20 4393.90 4390.10 36.13
7/14/2010 1.20 4393.90 4390.20 36.12
7/14/2010 1.20 4393.90 4390.20 36.12
7/15/2010 1.21 4393.90 4390.20 36.11
7/16/2010 1.21 4393.90 4390.20 36.10
7/16/2010 1.21 4393.90 4390.20 36.09
7/17/2010 1.21 4393.90 4390.20 36.09
7/17/2010 1.21 4393.90 4390.20 36.08
7/18/2010 1.21 4393.90 4390.20 36.07
7/18/2010 1.22 4393.90 4390.20 36.06
7/19/2010 1.22 4393.90 4390.20 36.05
7/19/2010 1.22 4394.00 4390.20 36.05
7/20/2010 1.22 4394.00 4390.30 36.04
7/21/2010 1.22 4394.00 4390.30 36.03
7/21/2010 1.22 4394.00 4390.30 36.02
7/22/2010 1.22 4394.00 4390.30 36.02
7/22/2010 1.23 4394.00 4390.30 36.01
7/23/2010 1.23 4394.00 4390.30 36.00
7/23/2010 1.23 4394.00 4390.30 35.99
7/24/2010 1.23 4394.00 4390.30 35.99
7/24/2010 1.23 4394.00 4390.30 35.98
7/25/2010 1.23 4394.00 4390.30 35.97
7/26/2010 1.24 4394.00 4390.40 35.96
7/26/2010 1.24 4394.00 4390.40 35.95
7/27/2010 1.24 4394.10 4390.40 35.95
7/27/2010 1.24 4394.10 4390.40 35.94
7/28/2010 1.24 4394.10 4390.40 35.93
7/28/2010 1.24 4394.10 4390.40 35.92
7/29/2010 1.24 4394.10 4390.40 35.92
7/29/2010 1.25 4394.10 4390.40 35.91
7/30/2010 1.25 4394.10 4390.40 35.90
7/31/2010 1.25 4394.10 4390.40 35.89
7/31/2010 1.25 4394.10 4390.50 35.89
8/1/2010 1.25 4394.10 4390.50 35.88
8/1/2010 1.25 4394.10 4390.50 35.87
8/2/2010 1.25 4394.10 4390.50 35.86
8/2/2010 1.26 4394.10 4390.50 35.85
8/3/2010 1.26 4394.20 4390.50 35.84
8/3/2010 1.26 4394.20 4390.50 35.83
8/4/2010 1.26 4394.20 4390.50 35.82
8/5/2010 1.26 4394.20 4390.50 35.81
8/5/2010 1.26 4394.20 4390.50 35.81
8/6/2010 1.27 4394.20 4390.60 35.80
17 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
8/6/2010 1.27 4394.20 4390.60 35.79
8/7/2010 1.27 4394.20 4390.60 35.78
8/7/2010 1.27 4394.20 4390.60 35.77
8/8/2010 1.27 4394.20 4390.60 35.76
8/8/2010 1.27 4394.20 4390.60 35.75
8/9/2010 1.27 4394.30 4390.60 35.74
8/10/2010 1.28 4394.30 4390.60 35.73
8/10/2010 1.28 4394.30 4390.60 35.72
8/11/2010 1.28 4394.30 4390.60 35.72
8/11/2010 1.28 4394.30 4390.70 35.71
8/12/2010 1.28 4394.30 4390.70 35.70
8/12/2010 1.28 4394.30 4390.70 35.69
8/13/2010 1.29 4394.30 4390.70 35.68
8/13/2010 1.29 4394.30 4390.70 35.67
8/14/2010 1.29 4394.30 4390.70 35.66
8/15/2010 1.29 4394.30 4390.70 35.65
8/15/2010 1.29 4394.40 4390.70 35.64
8/16/2010 1.29 4394.40 4390.70 35.64
8/16/2010 1.29 4394.40 4390.70 35.63
8/17/2010 1.30 4394.40 4390.80 35.62
8/17/2010 1.30 4394.40 4390.80 35.61
8/18/2010 1.30 4394.40 4390.80 35.60
8/18/2010 1.30 4394.40 4390.80 35.59
8/19/2010 1.30 4394.40 4390.80 35.58
8/20/2010 1.30 4394.40 4390.80 35.57
8/20/2010 1.31 4394.40 4390.80 35.56
8/21/2010 1.31 4394.40 4390.80 35.56
8/21/2010 1.31 4394.50 4390.80 35.55
8/22/2010 1.31 4394.50 4390.80 35.54
8/22/2010 1.31 4394.50 4390.80 35.53
8/23/2010 1.31 4394.50 4390.90 35.52
8/23/2010 1.31 4394.50 4390.90 35.51
8/24/2010 1.32 4394.50 4390.90 35.50
8/25/2010 1.32 4394.50 4390.90 35.49
8/25/2010 1.32 4394.50 4390.90 35.48
8/26/2010 1.32 4394.50 4390.90 35.48
8/26/2010 1.32 4394.50 4390.90 35.47
8/27/2010 1.32 4394.50 4390.90 35.46
8/27/2010 1.32 4394.60 4390.90 35.45
8/28/2010 1.33 4394.60 4390.90 35.44
8/28/2010 1.33 4394.60 4391.00 35.43
8/29/2010 1.33 4394.60 4391.00 35.42
8/30/2010 1.33 4394.60 4391.00 35.41
8/30/2010 1.33 4394.60 4391.00 35.41
8/31/2010 1.33 4394.60 4391.00 35.40
8/31/2010 1.34 4394.60 4391.00 35.39
9/1/2010 1.34 4394.60 4391.00 35.38
9/1/2010 1.34 4394.60 4391.00 35.37
9/2/2010 1.34 4394.60 4391.00 35.36
18 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
9/2/2010 1.34 4394.60 4391.00 35.35
9/3/2010 1.34 4394.70 4391.10 35.34
9/4/2010 1.34 4394.70 4391.10 35.33
9/4/2010 1.35 4394.70 4391.10 35.33
9/5/2010 1.35 4394.70 4391.10 35.32
9/5/2010 1.35 4394.70 4391.10 35.31
9/6/2010 1.35 4394.70 4391.10 35.30
9/6/2010 1.35 4394.70 4391.10 35.29
9/7/2010 1.35 4394.70 4391.10 35.28
9/7/2010 1.36 4394.70 4391.10 35.27
9/8/2010 1.36 4394.70 4391.10 35.26
9/9/2010 1.36 4394.70 4391.20 35.25
9/9/2010 1.36 4394.80 4391.20 35.25
9/10/2010 1.36 4394.80 4391.20 35.24
9/10/2010 1.36 4394.80 4391.20 35.23
9/11/2010 1.36 4394.80 4391.20 35.22
9/11/2010 1.37 4394.80 4391.20 35.21
9/12/2010 1.37 4394.80 4391.20 35.20
9/12/2010 1.37 4394.80 4391.20 35.19
9/13/2010 1.37 4394.80 4391.20 35.18
9/14/2010 1.37 4394.80 4391.20 35.17
9/14/2010 1.37 4394.80 4391.30 35.17
9/15/2010 1.37 4394.80 4391.30 35.16
9/15/2010 1.38 4394.90 4391.30 35.15
9/16/2010 1.38 4394.90 4391.30 35.14
9/16/2010 1.38 4394.90 4391.30 35.13
9/17/2010 1.38 4394.90 4391.30 35.12
9/17/2010 1.38 4394.90 4391.30 35.11
9/18/2010 1.38 4394.90 4391.30 35.10
9/19/2010 1.39 4394.90 4391.30 35.10
9/19/2010 1.39 4394.90 4391.30 35.09
9/20/2010 1.39 4394.90 4391.40 35.08
9/20/2010 1.39 4394.90 4391.40 35.07
9/21/2010 1.39 4394.90 4391.40 35.06
9/21/2010 1.39 4394.90 4391.40 35.05
9/22/2010 1.39 4395.00 4391.40 35.04
9/22/2010 1.40 4395.00 4391.40 35.03
9/23/2010 1.40 4395.00 4391.40 35.03
9/24/2010 1.40 4395.00 4391.40 35.02
9/24/2010 1.40 4395.00 4391.40 35.01
9/25/2010 1.40 4395.00 4391.40 35.00
9/25/2010 1.40 4395.00 4391.40 34.99
9/26/2010 1.41 4395.00 4391.50 34.98
9/26/2010 1.41 4395.00 4391.50 34.97
9/27/2010 1.41 4395.00 4391.50 34.96
9/27/2010 1.41 4395.00 4391.50 34.96
9/28/2010 1.41 4395.10 4391.50 34.95
9/29/2010 1.41 4395.10 4391.50 34.94
9/29/2010 1.41 4395.10 4391.50 34.93
19 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
9/30/2010 1.42 4395.10 4391.50 34.92
9/30/2010 1.42 4395.10 4391.50 34.91
10/1/2010 1.42 4395.10 4391.50 34.90
10/1/2010 1.42 4395.10 4391.60 34.89
10/2/2010 1.42 4395.10 4391.60 34.88
10/2/2010 1.42 4395.10 4391.60 34.87
10/3/2010 1.43 4395.10 4391.60 34.86
10/4/2010 1.43 4395.10 4391.60 34.85
10/4/2010 1.43 4395.20 4391.60 34.84
10/5/2010 1.43 4395.20 4391.60 34.83
10/5/2010 1.43 4395.20 4391.60 34.82
10/6/2010 1.43 4395.20 4391.60 34.81
10/6/2010 1.43 4395.20 4391.60 34.80
10/7/2010 1.44 4395.20 4391.70 34.79
10/7/2010 1.44 4395.20 4391.70 34.78
10/8/2010 1.44 4395.20 4391.70 34.77
10/9/2010 1.44 4395.20 4391.70 34.76
10/9/2010 1.44 4395.20 4391.70 34.75
10/10/2010 1.44 4395.30 4391.70 34.74
10/10/2010 1.44 4395.30 4391.70 34.73
10/11/2010 1.45 4395.30 4391.70 34.72
10/11/2010 1.45 4395.30 4391.70 34.71
10/12/2010 1.45 4395.30 4391.70 34.70
10/12/2010 1.45 4395.30 4391.80 34.69
10/13/2010 1.45 4395.30 4391.80 34.68
10/14/2010 1.45 4395.30 4391.80 34.67
10/14/2010 1.46 4395.30 4391.80 34.66
10/15/2010 1.46 4395.40 4391.80 34.65
10/15/2010 1.46 4395.40 4391.80 34.64
10/16/2010 1.46 4395.40 4391.80 34.63
10/16/2010 1.46 4395.40 4391.80 34.62
10/17/2010 1.46 4395.40 4391.80 34.61
10/17/2010 1.46 4395.40 4391.80 34.60
10/18/2010 1.47 4395.40 4391.90 34.59
10/19/2010 1.47 4395.40 4391.90 34.58
10/19/2010 1.47 4395.40 4391.90 34.57
10/20/2010 1.47 4395.40 4391.90 34.56
10/20/2010 1.47 4395.50 4391.90 34.55
10/21/2010 1.47 4395.50 4391.90 34.54
10/21/2010 1.48 4395.50 4391.90 34.53
10/22/2010 1.48 4395.50 4391.90 34.52
10/22/2010 1.48 4395.50 4391.90 34.51
10/23/2010 1.48 4395.50 4391.90 34.50
10/24/2010 1.48 4395.50 4392.00 34.49
10/24/2010 1.48 4395.50 4392.00 34.48
10/25/2010 1.48 4395.50 4392.00 34.47
10/25/2010 1.49 4395.50 4392.00 34.46
10/26/2010 1.49 4395.60 4392.00 34.45
10/26/2010 1.49 4395.60 4392.00 34.44
20 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
10/27/2010 1.49 4395.60 4392.00 34.43
10/27/2010 1.49 4395.60 4392.00 34.42
10/28/2010 1.49 4395.60 4392.00 34.41
10/29/2010 1.50 4395.60 4392.00 34.40
10/29/2010 1.50 4395.60 4392.00 34.39
10/30/2010 1.50 4395.60 4392.10 34.38
10/30/2010 1.50 4395.60 4392.10 34.37
10/31/2010 1.50 4395.60 4392.10 34.36
10/31/2010 1.50 4395.70 4392.10 34.35
11/1/2010 1.50 4395.70 4392.10 34.34
11/1/2010 1.51 4395.70 4392.10 34.33
11/2/2010 1.51 4395.70 4392.10 34.32
11/3/2010 1.51 4395.70 4392.10 34.31
11/3/2010 1.51 4395.70 4392.10 34.29
11/4/2010 1.51 4395.70 4392.10 34.28
11/4/2010 1.51 4395.70 4392.20 34.27
11/5/2010 1.51 4395.70 4392.20 34.26
11/5/2010 1.52 4395.80 4392.20 34.25
11/6/2010 1.52 4395.80 4392.20 34.24
11/6/2010 1.52 4395.80 4392.20 34.22
11/7/2010 1.52 4395.80 4392.20 34.21
11/8/2010 1.52 4395.80 4392.20 34.20
11/8/2010 1.52 4395.80 4392.20 34.19
11/9/2010 1.53 4395.80 4392.20 34.18
11/9/2010 1.53 4395.80 4392.20 34.17
11/10/2010 1.53 4395.80 4392.30 34.16
11/10/2010 1.53 4395.90 4392.30 34.14
11/11/2010 1.53 4395.90 4392.30 34.13
11/11/2010 1.53 4395.90 4392.30 34.12
11/12/2010 1.53 4395.90 4392.30 34.11
11/13/2010 1.54 4395.90 4392.30 34.10
11/13/2010 1.54 4395.90 4392.30 34.09
11/14/2010 1.54 4395.90 4392.30 34.07
11/14/2010 1.54 4395.90 4392.30 34.06
11/15/2010 1.54 4395.90 4392.30 34.05
11/15/2010 1.54 4396.00 4392.40 34.04
11/16/2010 1.55 4396.00 4392.40 34.03
11/16/2010 1.55 4396.00 4392.40 34.02
11/17/2010 1.55 4396.00 4392.40 34.01
11/18/2010 1.55 4396.00 4392.40 33.99
11/18/2010 1.55 4396.00 4392.40 33.98
11/19/2010 1.55 4396.00 4392.40 33.97
11/19/2010 1.55 4396.00 4392.40 33.96
11/20/2010 1.56 4396.10 4392.40 33.95
11/20/2010 1.56 4396.10 4392.40 33.94
11/21/2010 1.56 4396.10 4392.50 33.93
11/21/2010 1.56 4396.10 4392.50 33.91
11/22/2010 1.56 4396.10 4392.50 33.90
11/23/2010 1.56 4396.10 4392.50 33.89
21 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
11/23/2010 1.57 4396.10 4392.50 33.88
11/24/2010 1.57 4396.10 4392.50 33.87
11/24/2010 1.57 4396.10 4392.50 33.86
11/25/2010 1.57 4396.20 4392.50 33.85
11/25/2010 1.57 4396.20 4392.50 33.83
11/26/2010 1.57 4396.20 4392.50 33.82
11/26/2010 1.57 4396.20 4392.60 33.81
11/27/2010 1.58 4396.20 4392.60 33.80
11/28/2010 1.58 4396.20 4392.60 33.79
11/28/2010 1.58 4396.20 4392.60 33.78
11/29/2010 1.58 4396.20 4392.60 33.77
11/29/2010 1.58 4396.20 4392.60 33.75
11/30/2010 1.58 4396.30 4392.60 33.74
11/30/2010 1.58 4396.30 4392.60 33.73
12/1/2010 1.59 4396.30 4392.60 33.72
12/1/2010 1.59 4396.30 4392.60 33.71
12/2/2010 1.59 4396.30 4392.60 33.69
12/3/2010 1.59 4396.30 4392.70 33.68
12/3/2010 1.59 4396.30 4392.70 33.67
12/4/2010 1.59 4396.30 4392.70 33.65
12/4/2010 1.60 4396.40 4392.70 33.64
12/5/2010 1.60 4396.40 4392.70 33.63
12/5/2010 1.60 4396.40 4392.70 33.61
12/6/2010 1.60 4396.40 4392.70 33.60
12/6/2010 1.60 4396.40 4392.70 33.59
12/7/2010 1.60 4396.40 4392.70 33.57
12/8/2010 1.60 4396.40 4392.70 33.56
12/8/2010 1.61 4396.50 4392.80 33.55
12/9/2010 1.61 4396.50 4392.80 33.53
12/9/2010 1.61 4396.50 4392.80 33.52
12/10/2010 1.61 4396.50 4392.80 33.50
12/10/2010 1.61 4396.50 4392.80 33.49
12/11/2010 1.61 4396.50 4392.80 33.48
12/11/2010 1.62 4396.50 4392.80 33.46
12/12/2010 1.62 4396.50 4392.80 33.45
12/13/2010 1.62 4396.60 4392.80 33.44
12/13/2010 1.62 4396.60 4392.80 33.42
12/14/2010 1.62 4396.60 4392.90 33.41
12/14/2010 1.62 4396.60 4392.90 33.40
12/15/2010 1.62 4396.60 4392.90 33.38
12/15/2010 1.63 4396.60 4392.90 33.37
12/16/2010 1.63 4396.60 4392.90 33.36
12/16/2010 1.63 4396.70 4392.90 33.34
12/17/2010 1.63 4396.70 4392.90 33.33
12/18/2010 1.63 4396.70 4392.90 33.32
12/18/2010 1.63 4396.70 4392.90 33.30
12/19/2010 1.64 4396.70 4392.90 33.29
12/19/2010 1.64 4396.70 4393.00 33.28
12/20/2010 1.64 4396.70 4393.00 33.26
22 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
12/20/2010 1.64 4396.80 4393.00 33.25
12/21/2010 1.64 4396.80 4393.00 33.24
12/21/2010 1.64 4396.80 4393.00 33.22
12/22/2010 1.64 4396.80 4393.00 33.21
12/23/2010 1.65 4396.80 4393.00 33.20
12/23/2010 1.65 4396.80 4393.00 33.18
12/24/2010 1.65 4396.80 4393.00 33.17
12/24/2010 1.65 4396.80 4393.00 33.16
12/25/2010 1.65 4396.90 4393.10 33.14
12/25/2010 1.65 4396.90 4393.10 33.13
12/26/2010 1.65 4396.90 4393.10 33.12
12/26/2010 1.66 4396.90 4393.10 33.10
12/27/2010 1.66 4396.90 4393.10 33.09
12/28/2010 1.66 4396.90 4393.10 33.08
12/28/2010 1.66 4396.90 4393.10 33.06
12/29/2010 1.66 4397.00 4393.10 33.05
12/29/2010 1.66 4397.00 4393.10 33.04
12/30/2010 1.67 4397.00 4393.10 33.02
12/30/2010 1.67 4397.00 4393.20 33.01
12/31/2010 1.67 4397.00 4393.20 33.00
12/31/2010 1.67 4397.00 4393.20 32.98
1/1/2011 1.67 4397.00 4393.20 32.97
1/2/2011 1.67 4397.00 4393.20 32.96
1/2/2011 1.67 4397.10 4393.20 32.94
1/3/2011 1.68 4397.10 4393.20 32.93
1/3/2011 1.68 4397.10 4393.20 32.91
1/4/2011 1.68 4397.10 4393.20 32.90
1/4/2011 1.68 4397.10 4393.20 32.88
1/5/2011 1.68 4397.10 4393.30 32.87
1/5/2011 1.68 4397.10 4393.30 32.85
1/6/2011 1.69 4397.20 4393.30 32.84
1/7/2011 1.69 4397.20 4393.30 32.82
1/7/2011 1.69 4397.20 4393.30 32.81
1/8/2011 1.69 4397.20 4393.30 32.79
1/8/2011 1.69 4397.20 4393.30 32.78
1/9/2011 1.69 4397.20 4393.30 32.77
1/9/2011 1.69 4397.30 4393.30 32.75
1/10/2011 1.70 4397.30 4393.30 32.74
1/10/2011 1.70 4397.30 4393.30 32.72
1/11/2011 1.70 4397.30 4393.40 32.71
1/12/2011 1.70 4397.30 4393.40 32.69
1/12/2011 1.70 4397.30 4393.40 32.68
1/13/2011 1.70 4397.30 4393.40 32.66
1/13/2011 1.71 4397.40 4393.40 32.65
1/14/2011 1.71 4397.40 4393.40 32.63
1/14/2011 1.71 4397.40 4393.40 32.62
1/15/2011 1.71 4397.40 4393.40 32.60
1/15/2011 1.71 4397.40 4393.40 32.59
1/16/2011 1.71 4397.40 4393.40 32.58
23 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
1/17/2011 1.71 4397.40 4393.50 32.56
1/17/2011 1.72 4397.50 4393.50 32.55
1/18/2011 1.72 4397.50 4393.50 32.53
1/18/2011 1.72 4397.50 4393.50 32.52
1/19/2011 1.72 4397.50 4393.50 32.50
1/19/2011 1.72 4397.50 4393.50 32.49
1/20/2011 1.72 4397.50 4393.50 32.47
1/20/2011 1.72 4397.50 4393.50 32.46
1/21/2011 1.73 4397.60 4393.50 32.44
1/22/2011 1.73 4397.60 4393.50 32.43
1/22/2011 1.73 4397.60 4393.60 32.42
1/23/2011 1.73 4397.60 4393.60 32.40
1/23/2011 1.73 4397.60 4393.60 32.39
1/24/2011 1.73 4397.60 4393.60 32.37
1/24/2011 1.74 4397.60 4393.60 32.36
1/25/2011 1.74 4397.70 4393.60 32.34
1/25/2011 1.74 4397.70 4393.60 32.33
1/26/2011 1.74 4397.70 4393.60 32.31
1/27/2011 1.74 4397.70 4393.60 32.30
1/27/2011 1.74 4397.70 4393.60 32.28
1/28/2011 1.74 4397.70 4393.70 32.27
1/28/2011 1.75 4397.70 4393.70 32.26
1/29/2011 1.75 4397.80 4393.70 32.24
1/29/2011 1.75 4397.80 4393.70 32.23
1/30/2011 1.75 4397.80 4393.70 32.21
1/30/2011 1.75 4397.80 4393.70 32.20
1/31/2011 1.75 4397.80 4393.70 32.18
2/1/2011 1.76 4397.80 4393.70 32.17
2/1/2011 1.76 4397.80 4393.70 32.15
2/2/2011 1.76 4397.90 4393.70 32.14
2/2/2011 1.76 4397.90 4393.80 32.12
2/3/2011 1.76 4397.90 4393.80 32.11
2/3/2011 1.76 4397.90 4393.80 32.10
2/4/2011 1.76 4397.90 4393.80 32.08
2/4/2011 1.77 4397.90 4393.80 32.07
2/5/2011 1.77 4397.90 4393.80 32.05
2/6/2011 1.77 4398.00 4393.80 32.04
2/6/2011 1.77 4398.00 4393.80 32.02
2/7/2011 1.77 4398.00 4393.80 32.01
2/7/2011 1.77 4398.00 4393.80 31.99
2/8/2011 1.77 4398.00 4393.90 31.98
2/8/2011 1.78 4398.00 4393.90 31.96
2/9/2011 1.78 4398.10 4393.90 31.95
2/9/2011 1.78 4398.10 4393.90 31.93
2/10/2011 1.78 4398.10 4393.90 31.92
2/11/2011 1.78 4398.10 4393.90 31.90
2/11/2011 1.78 4398.10 4393.90 31.89
2/12/2011 1.79 4398.10 4393.90 31.88
2/12/2011 1.79 4398.10 4393.90 31.86
24 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
2/13/2011 1.79 4398.20 4393.90 31.85
2/13/2011 1.79 4398.20 4393.90 31.83
2/14/2011 1.79 4398.20 4394.00 31.82
2/14/2011 1.79 4398.20 4394.00 31.80
2/15/2011 1.79 4398.20 4394.00 31.79
2/16/2011 1.80 4398.20 4394.00 31.77
2/16/2011 1.80 4398.20 4394.00 31.76
2/17/2011 1.80 4398.30 4394.00 31.74
2/17/2011 1.80 4398.30 4394.00 31.73
2/18/2011 1.80 4398.30 4394.00 31.71
2/18/2011 1.80 4398.30 4394.00 31.70
2/19/2011 1.81 4398.30 4394.00 31.69
2/19/2011 1.81 4398.30 4394.10 31.67
2/20/2011 1.81 4398.30 4394.10 31.66
2/21/2011 1.81 4398.40 4394.10 31.64
2/21/2011 1.81 4398.40 4394.10 31.63
2/22/2011 1.81 4398.40 4394.10 31.61
2/22/2011 1.81 4398.40 4394.10 31.60
2/23/2011 1.82 4398.40 4394.10 31.58
2/23/2011 1.82 4398.40 4394.10 31.57
2/24/2011 1.82 4398.40 4394.10 31.55
2/24/2011 1.82 4398.50 4394.10 31.54
2/25/2011 1.82 4398.50 4394.20 31.53
2/26/2011 1.82 4398.50 4394.20 31.51
2/26/2011 1.83 4398.50 4394.20 31.50
2/27/2011 1.83 4398.50 4394.20 31.48
2/27/2011 1.83 4398.50 4394.20 31.47
2/28/2011 1.83 4398.50 4394.20 31.45
2/28/2011 1.83 4398.60 4394.20 31.44
3/1/2011 1.83 4398.60 4394.20 31.42
3/1/2011 1.83 4398.60 4394.20 31.41
3/2/2011 1.84 4398.60 4394.20 31.39
3/3/2011 1.84 4398.60 4394.30 31.38
3/3/2011 1.84 4398.60 4394.30 31.36
3/4/2011 1.84 4398.70 4394.30 31.35
3/4/2011 1.84 4398.70 4394.30 31.33
3/5/2011 1.84 4398.70 4394.30 31.32
3/5/2011 1.84 4398.70 4394.30 31.30
3/6/2011 1.85 4398.70 4394.30 31.28
3/6/2011 1.85 4398.70 4394.30 31.27
3/7/2011 1.85 4398.70 4394.30 31.25
3/8/2011 1.85 4398.80 4394.30 31.24
3/8/2011 1.85 4398.80 4394.40 31.22
3/9/2011 1.85 4398.80 4394.40 31.21
3/9/2011 1.86 4398.80 4394.40 31.19
3/10/2011 1.86 4398.80 4394.40 31.18
3/10/2011 1.86 4398.80 4394.40 31.16
3/11/2011 1.86 4398.90 4394.40 31.15
3/11/2011 1.86 4398.90 4394.40 31.13
25 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
3/12/2011 1.86 4398.90 4394.40 31.11
3/13/2011 1.86 4398.90 4394.40 31.10
3/13/2011 1.87 4398.90 4394.40 31.08
3/14/2011 1.87 4398.90 4394.50 31.07
3/14/2011 1.87 4398.90 4394.50 31.05
3/15/2011 1.87 4399.00 4394.50 31.04
3/15/2011 1.87 4399.00 4394.50 31.02
3/16/2011 1.87 4399.00 4394.50 31.01
3/16/2011 1.88 4399.00 4394.50 30.99
3/17/2011 1.88 4399.00 4394.50 30.98
3/18/2011 1.88 4399.00 4394.50 30.96
3/18/2011 1.88 4399.10 4394.50 30.94
3/19/2011 1.88 4399.10 4394.50 30.93
3/19/2011 1.88 4399.10 4394.50 30.91
3/20/2011 1.88 4399.10 4394.60 30.90
3/20/2011 1.89 4399.10 4394.60 30.88
3/21/2011 1.89 4399.10 4394.60 30.87
3/21/2011 1.89 4399.10 4394.60 30.85
3/22/2011 1.89 4399.20 4394.60 30.84
3/23/2011 1.89 4399.20 4394.60 30.82
3/23/2011 1.89 4399.20 4394.60 30.81
3/24/2011 1.90 4399.20 4394.60 30.79
3/24/2011 1.90 4399.20 4394.60 30.78
3/25/2011 1.90 4399.20 4394.60 30.76
3/25/2011 1.90 4399.30 4394.70 30.74
3/26/2011 1.90 4399.30 4394.70 30.73
3/26/2011 1.90 4399.30 4394.70 30.71
3/27/2011 1.90 4399.30 4394.70 30.70
3/28/2011 1.91 4399.30 4394.70 30.68
3/28/2011 1.91 4399.30 4394.70 30.67
3/29/2011 1.91 4399.30 4394.70 30.65
3/29/2011 1.91 4399.40 4394.70 30.64
3/30/2011 1.91 4399.40 4394.70 30.62
3/30/2011 1.91 4399.40 4394.70 30.61
3/31/2011 1.91 4399.40 4394.80 30.59
3/31/2011 1.92 4399.40 4394.80 30.58
4/1/2011 1.92 4399.40 4394.80 30.56
4/2/2011 1.92 4399.50 4394.80 30.55
4/2/2011 1.92 4399.50 4394.80 30.53
4/3/2011 1.92 4399.50 4394.80 30.52
4/3/2011 1.92 4399.50 4394.80 30.51
4/4/2011 1.93 4399.50 4394.80 30.50
4/4/2011 1.93 4399.50 4394.80 30.48
4/5/2011 1.93 4399.50 4394.80 30.47
4/5/2011 1.93 4399.50 4394.90 30.46
4/6/2011 1.93 4399.60 4394.90 30.45
4/7/2011 1.93 4399.60 4394.90 30.43
4/7/2011 1.93 4399.60 4394.90 30.42
4/8/2011 1.94 4399.60 4394.90 30.41
26 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
4/8/2011 1.94 4399.60 4394.90 30.39
4/9/2011 1.94 4399.60 4394.90 30.38
4/9/2011 1.94 4399.60 4394.90 30.37
4/10/2011 1.94 4399.60 4394.90 30.36
4/10/2011 1.94 4399.70 4394.90 30.34
4/11/2011 1.95 4399.70 4395.00 30.33
4/12/2011 1.95 4399.70 4395.00 30.32
4/12/2011 1.95 4399.70 4395.00 30.31
4/13/2011 1.95 4399.70 4395.00 30.29
4/13/2011 1.95 4399.70 4395.00 30.28
4/14/2011 1.95 4399.70 4395.00 30.27
4/14/2011 1.95 4399.70 4395.00 30.25
4/15/2011 1.96 4399.80 4395.00 30.24
4/15/2011 1.96 4399.80 4395.00 30.23
4/16/2011 1.96 4399.80 4395.00 30.22
4/17/2011 1.96 4399.80 4395.10 30.20
4/17/2011 1.96 4399.80 4395.10 30.19
4/18/2011 1.96 4399.80 4395.10 30.18
4/18/2011 1.97 4399.80 4395.10 30.17
4/19/2011 1.97 4399.80 4395.10 30.15
4/19/2011 1.97 4399.90 4395.10 30.14
4/20/2011 1.97 4399.90 4395.10 30.13
4/20/2011 1.97 4399.90 4395.10 30.11
4/21/2011 1.97 4399.90 4395.10 30.10
4/22/2011 1.97 4399.90 4395.10 30.09
4/22/2011 1.98 4399.90 4395.10 30.08
4/23/2011 1.98 4399.90 4395.20 30.06
4/23/2011 1.98 4399.90 4395.20 30.05
4/24/2011 1.98 4400.00 4395.20 30.04
4/24/2011 1.98 4400.00 4395.20 30.03
4/25/2011 1.98 4400.00 4395.20 30.01
4/25/2011 1.98 4400.00 4395.20 30.00
4/26/2011 1.99 4400.00 4395.20 29.99
4/27/2011 1.99 4400.00 4395.20 29.98
4/27/2011 1.99 4400.00 4395.20 29.97
4/28/2011 1.99 4400.00 4395.20 29.96
4/28/2011 1.99 4400.00 4395.30 29.95
4/29/2011 1.99 4400.10 4395.30 29.94
4/29/2011 2.00 4400.10 4395.30 29.93
4/30/2011 2.00 4400.10 4395.30 29.92
4/30/2011 2.00 4400.10 4395.30 29.91
5/1/2011 2.00 4400.10 4395.30 29.90
5/2/2011 2.00 4400.10 4395.30 29.89
5/2/2011 2.00 4400.10 4395.30 29.88
5/3/2011 2.00 4400.10 4395.30 29.87
5/3/2011 2.01 4400.10 4395.30 29.86
5/4/2011 2.01 4400.10 4395.40 29.85
5/4/2011 2.01 4400.20 4395.40 29.84
5/5/2011 2.01 4400.20 4395.40 29.83
27 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
5/5/2011 2.01 4400.20 4395.40 29.83
5/6/2011 2.01 4400.20 4395.40 29.82
5/7/2011 2.02 4400.20 4395.40 29.81
5/7/2011 2.02 4400.20 4395.40 29.80
5/8/2011 2.02 4400.20 4395.40 29.79
5/8/2011 2.02 4400.20 4395.40 29.78
5/9/2011 2.02 4400.20 4395.40 29.77
5/9/2011 2.02 4400.20 4395.50 29.76
5/10/2011 2.02 4400.30 4395.50 29.75
5/10/2011 2.03 4400.30 4395.50 29.74
5/11/2011 2.03 4400.30 4395.50 29.73
5/12/2011 2.03 4400.30 4395.50 29.72
5/12/2011 2.03 4400.30 4395.50 29.71
5/13/2011 2.03 4400.30 4395.50 29.70
5/13/2011 2.03 4400.30 4395.50 29.69
5/14/2011 2.04 4400.30 4395.50 29.68
5/14/2011 2.04 4400.30 4395.50 29.67
5/15/2011 2.04 4400.30 4395.60 29.67
5/15/2011 2.04 4400.30 4395.60 29.66
5/16/2011 2.04 4400.40 4395.60 29.65
5/17/2011 2.04 4400.40 4395.60 29.64
5/17/2011 2.04 4400.40 4395.60 29.63
5/18/2011 2.05 4400.40 4395.60 29.62
5/18/2011 2.05 4400.40 4395.60 29.61
5/19/2011 2.05 4400.40 4395.60 29.60
5/19/2011 2.05 4400.40 4395.60 29.59
5/20/2011 2.05 4400.40 4395.60 29.58
5/20/2011 2.05 4400.40 4395.70 29.57
5/21/2011 2.05 4400.40 4395.70 29.56
5/22/2011 2.06 4400.40 4395.70 29.55
5/22/2011 2.06 4400.50 4395.70 29.54
5/23/2011 2.06 4400.50 4395.70 29.53
5/23/2011 2.06 4400.50 4395.70 29.52
5/24/2011 2.06 4400.50 4395.70 29.51
5/24/2011 2.06 4400.50 4395.70 29.51
5/25/2011 2.07 4400.50 4395.70 29.50
5/25/2011 2.07 4400.50 4395.70 29.49
5/26/2011 2.07 4400.50 4395.80 29.48
5/27/2011 2.07 4400.50 4395.80 29.47
5/27/2011 2.07 4400.50 4395.80 29.46
5/28/2011 2.07 4400.60 4395.80 29.45
5/28/2011 2.07 4400.60 4395.80 29.44
5/29/2011 2.08 4400.60 4395.80 29.43
5/29/2011 2.08 4400.60 4395.80 29.42
5/30/2011 2.08 4400.60 4395.80 29.41
5/30/2011 2.08 4400.60 4395.80 29.40
5/31/2011 2.08 4400.60 4395.80 29.39
6/1/2011 2.08 4400.60 4395.80 29.38
6/1/2011 2.09 4400.60 4395.90 29.38
28 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
6/2/2011 2.09 4400.60 4395.90 29.37
6/2/2011 2.09 4400.60 4395.90 29.36
6/3/2011 2.09 4400.60 4395.90 29.35
6/3/2011 2.09 4400.70 4395.90 29.35
6/4/2011 2.09 4400.70 4395.90 29.34
6/4/2011 2.09 4400.70 4395.90 29.33
6/5/2011 2.10 4400.70 4395.90 29.32
6/6/2011 2.10 4400.70 4395.90 29.31
6/6/2011 2.10 4400.70 4395.90 29.31
6/7/2011 2.10 4400.70 4396.00 29.30
6/7/2011 2.10 4400.70 4396.00 29.29
6/8/2011 2.10 4400.70 4396.00 29.28
6/8/2011 2.11 4400.70 4396.00 29.28
6/9/2011 2.11 4400.70 4396.00 29.27
6/9/2011 2.11 4400.70 4396.00 29.26
6/10/2011 2.11 4400.70 4396.00 29.25
6/11/2011 2.11 4400.80 4396.00 29.25
6/11/2011 2.11 4400.80 4396.00 29.24
6/12/2011 2.11 4400.80 4396.00 29.23
6/12/2011 2.12 4400.80 4396.10 29.22
6/13/2011 2.12 4400.80 4396.10 29.22
6/13/2011 2.12 4400.80 4396.10 29.21
6/14/2011 2.12 4400.80 4396.10 29.20
6/14/2011 2.12 4400.80 4396.10 29.19
6/15/2011 2.12 4400.80 4396.10 29.19
6/16/2011 2.12 4400.80 4396.10 29.18
6/16/2011 2.13 4400.80 4396.10 29.17
6/17/2011 2.13 4400.80 4396.10 29.16
6/17/2011 2.13 4400.80 4396.10 29.16
6/18/2011 2.13 4400.90 4396.20 29.15
6/18/2011 2.13 4400.90 4396.20 29.14
6/19/2011 2.13 4400.90 4396.20 29.13
6/19/2011 2.14 4400.90 4396.20 29.13
6/20/2011 2.14 4400.90 4396.20 29.12
6/21/2011 2.14 4400.90 4396.20 29.11
6/21/2011 2.14 4400.90 4396.20 29.10
6/22/2011 2.14 4400.90 4396.20 29.10
6/22/2011 2.14 4400.90 4396.20 29.09
6/23/2011 2.14 4400.90 4396.20 29.08
6/23/2011 2.15 4400.90 4396.30 29.07
6/24/2011 2.15 4400.90 4396.30 29.07
6/24/2011 2.15 4400.90 4396.30 29.06
6/25/2011 2.15 4401.00 4396.30 29.05
6/26/2011 2.15 4401.00 4396.30 29.04
6/26/2011 2.15 4401.00 4396.30 29.04
6/27/2011 2.16 4401.00 4396.30 29.03
6/27/2011 2.16 4401.00 4396.30 29.02
6/28/2011 2.16 4401.00 4396.30 29.01
6/28/2011 2.16 4401.00 4396.30 29.01
29 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
6/29/2011 2.16 4401.00 4396.40 29.00
6/29/2011 2.16 4401.00 4396.40 28.99
6/30/2011 2.16 4401.00 4396.40 28.98
7/1/2011 2.17 4401.00 4396.40 28.97
7/1/2011 2.17 4401.00 4396.40 28.97
7/2/2011 2.17 4401.00 4396.40 28.97
7/2/2011 2.17 4401.00 4396.40 28.96
7/3/2011 2.17 4401.00 4396.40 28.96
7/3/2011 2.17 4401.00 4396.40 28.96
7/4/2011 2.17 4401.00 4396.40 28.95
7/4/2011 2.18 4401.10 4396.40 28.95
7/5/2011 2.18 4401.10 4396.50 28.94
7/6/2011 2.18 4401.10 4396.50 28.94
7/6/2011 2.18 4401.10 4396.50 28.94
7/7/2011 2.18 4401.10 4396.50 28.93
7/7/2011 2.18 4401.10 4396.50 28.93
7/8/2011 2.19 4401.10 4396.50 28.92
7/8/2011 2.19 4401.10 4396.50 28.92
7/9/2011 2.19 4401.10 4396.50 28.92
7/9/2011 2.19 4401.10 4396.50 28.91
7/10/2011 2.19 4401.10 4396.50 28.91
7/11/2011 2.19 4401.10 4396.60 28.91
7/11/2011 2.19 4401.10 4396.60 28.90
7/12/2011 2.20 4401.10 4396.60 28.90
7/12/2011 2.20 4401.10 4396.60 28.89
7/13/2011 2.20 4401.10 4396.60 28.89
7/13/2011 2.20 4401.10 4396.60 28.89
7/14/2011 2.20 4401.10 4396.60 28.88
7/14/2011 2.20 4401.10 4396.60 28.88
7/15/2011 2.21 4401.10 4396.60 28.87
7/16/2011 2.21 4401.10 4396.60 28.87
7/16/2011 2.21 4401.10 4396.70 28.87
7/17/2011 2.21 4401.10 4396.70 28.86
7/17/2011 2.21 4401.10 4396.70 28.86
7/18/2011 2.21 4401.10 4396.70 28.85
7/18/2011 2.21 4401.10 4396.70 28.85
7/19/2011 2.22 4401.20 4396.70 28.85
7/19/2011 2.22 4401.20 4396.70 28.84
7/20/2011 2.22 4401.20 4396.70 28.84
7/21/2011 2.22 4401.20 4396.70 28.84
7/21/2011 2.22 4401.20 4396.70 28.83
7/22/2011 2.22 4401.20 4396.80 28.83
7/22/2011 2.23 4401.20 4396.80 28.82
7/23/2011 2.23 4401.20 4396.80 28.82
7/23/2011 2.23 4401.20 4396.80 28.82
7/24/2011 2.23 4401.20 4396.80 28.81
7/24/2011 2.23 4401.20 4396.80 28.81
7/25/2011 2.23 4401.20 4396.80 28.80
7/26/2011 2.23 4401.20 4396.80 28.80
30 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
7/26/2011 2.24 4401.20 4396.80 28.80
7/27/2011 2.24 4401.20 4396.80 28.79
7/27/2011 2.24 4401.20 4396.90 28.79
7/28/2011 2.24 4401.20 4396.90 28.79
7/28/2011 2.24 4401.20 4396.90 28.78
7/29/2011 2.24 4401.20 4396.90 28.78
7/29/2011 2.24 4401.20 4396.90 28.77
7/30/2011 2.25 4401.20 4396.90 28.77
7/31/2011 2.25 4401.20 4396.90 28.77
7/31/2011 2.25 4401.20 4396.90 28.76
8/1/2011 2.25 4401.20 4396.90 28.76
8/1/2011 2.25 4401.20 4396.90 28.75
8/2/2011 2.25 4401.30 4397.00 28.75
8/2/2011 2.26 4401.30 4397.00 28.75
8/3/2011 2.26 4401.30 4397.00 28.74
8/3/2011 2.26 4401.30 4397.00 28.74
8/4/2011 2.26 4401.30 4397.00 28.73
8/5/2011 2.26 4401.30 4397.00 28.73
8/5/2011 2.26 4401.30 4397.00 28.72
8/6/2011 2.26 4401.30 4397.00 28.72
8/6/2011 2.27 4401.30 4397.00 28.71
8/7/2011 2.27 4401.30 4397.00 28.71
8/7/2011 2.27 4401.30 4397.00 28.71
8/8/2011 2.27 4401.30 4397.10 28.70
8/8/2011 2.27 4401.30 4397.10 28.70
8/9/2011 2.27 4401.30 4397.10 28.69
8/10/2011 2.28 4401.30 4397.10 28.69
8/10/2011 2.28 4401.30 4397.10 28.68
8/11/2011 2.28 4401.30 4397.10 28.68
8/11/2011 2.28 4401.30 4397.10 28.67
8/12/2011 2.28 4401.30 4397.10 28.67
8/12/2011 2.28 4401.30 4397.10 28.67
8/13/2011 2.28 4401.30 4397.10 28.66
8/13/2011 2.29 4401.30 4397.20 28.66
8/14/2011 2.29 4401.30 4397.20 28.65
8/15/2011 2.29 4401.40 4397.20 28.65
8/15/2011 2.29 4401.40 4397.20 28.64
8/16/2011 2.29 4401.40 4397.20 28.64
8/16/2011 2.29 4401.40 4397.20 28.64
8/17/2011 2.30 4401.40 4397.20 28.63
8/17/2011 2.30 4401.40 4397.20 28.63
8/18/2011 2.30 4401.40 4397.20 28.62
8/18/2011 2.30 4401.40 4397.20 28.62
8/19/2011 2.30 4401.40 4397.30 28.61
8/20/2011 2.30 4401.40 4397.30 28.61
8/20/2011 2.30 4401.40 4397.30 28.60
8/21/2011 2.31 4401.40 4397.30 28.60
8/21/2011 2.31 4401.40 4397.30 28.60
8/22/2011 2.31 4401.40 4397.30 28.59
31 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
8/22/2011 2.31 4401.40 4397.30 28.59
8/23/2011 2.31 4401.40 4397.30 28.58
8/23/2011 2.31 4401.40 4397.30 28.58
8/24/2011 2.31 4401.40 4397.30 28.57
8/25/2011 2.32 4401.40 4397.40 28.57
8/25/2011 2.32 4401.40 4397.40 28.57
8/26/2011 2.32 4401.40 4397.40 28.56
8/26/2011 2.32 4401.40 4397.40 28.56
8/27/2011 2.32 4401.40 4397.40 28.55
8/27/2011 2.32 4401.50 4397.40 28.55
8/28/2011 2.33 4401.50 4397.40 28.54
8/28/2011 2.33 4401.50 4397.40 28.54
8/29/2011 2.33 4401.50 4397.40 28.53
8/30/2011 2.33 4401.50 4397.40 28.53
8/30/2011 2.33 4401.50 4397.50 28.53
8/31/2011 2.33 4401.50 4397.50 28.52
8/31/2011 2.33 4401.50 4397.50 28.52
9/1/2011 2.34 4401.50 4397.50 28.51
9/1/2011 2.34 4401.50 4397.50 28.51
9/2/2011 2.34 4401.50 4397.50 28.50
9/2/2011 2.34 4401.50 4397.50 28.50
9/3/2011 2.34 4401.50 4397.50 28.49
9/4/2011 2.34 4401.50 4397.50 28.49
9/4/2011 2.35 4401.50 4397.50 28.49
9/5/2011 2.35 4401.50 4397.60 28.48
9/5/2011 2.35 4401.50 4397.60 28.48
9/6/2011 2.35 4401.50 4397.60 28.47
9/6/2011 2.35 4401.50 4397.60 28.47
9/7/2011 2.35 4401.50 4397.60 28.46
9/7/2011 2.35 4401.50 4397.60 28.46
9/8/2011 2.36 4401.50 4397.60 28.45
9/9/2011 2.36 4401.60 4397.60 28.45
9/9/2011 2.36 4401.60 4397.60 28.45
9/10/2011 2.36 4401.60 4397.60 28.44
9/10/2011 2.36 4401.60 4397.60 28.44
9/11/2011 2.36 4401.60 4397.70 28.43
9/11/2011 2.37 4401.60 4397.70 28.43
9/12/2011 2.37 4401.60 4397.70 28.42
9/12/2011 2.37 4401.60 4397.70 28.42
9/13/2011 2.37 4401.60 4397.70 28.41
9/14/2011 2.37 4401.60 4397.70 28.41
9/14/2011 2.37 4401.60 4397.70 28.40
9/15/2011 2.37 4401.60 4397.70 28.40
9/15/2011 2.38 4401.60 4397.70 28.40
9/16/2011 2.38 4401.60 4397.70 28.39
9/16/2011 2.38 4401.60 4397.80 28.39
9/17/2011 2.38 4401.60 4397.80 28.38
9/17/2011 2.38 4401.60 4397.80 28.38
9/18/2011 2.38 4401.60 4397.80 28.37
32 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
9/19/2011 2.38 4401.60 4397.80 28.37
9/19/2011 2.39 4401.60 4397.80 28.36
9/20/2011 2.39 4401.60 4397.80 28.36
9/20/2011 2.39 4401.60 4397.80 28.36
9/21/2011 2.39 4401.60 4397.80 28.35
9/21/2011 2.39 4401.70 4397.80 28.35
9/22/2011 2.39 4401.70 4397.90 28.34
9/22/2011 2.40 4401.70 4397.90 28.34
9/23/2011 2.40 4401.70 4397.90 28.33
9/24/2011 2.40 4401.70 4397.90 28.33
9/24/2011 2.40 4401.70 4397.90 28.32
9/25/2011 2.40 4401.70 4397.90 28.32
9/25/2011 2.40 4401.70 4397.90 28.32
9/26/2011 2.40 4401.70 4397.90 28.31
9/26/2011 2.41 4401.70 4397.90 28.31
9/27/2011 2.41 4401.70 4397.90 28.30
9/27/2011 2.41 4401.70 4398.00 28.30
9/28/2011 2.41 4401.70 4398.00 28.29
9/29/2011 2.41 4401.70 4398.00 28.29
9/29/2011 2.41 4401.70 4398.00 28.28
9/30/2011 2.42 4401.70 4398.00 28.28
9/30/2011 2.42 4401.70 4398.00 28.28
10/1/2011 2.42 4401.70 4398.00 28.27
10/1/2011 2.42 4401.70 4398.00 28.26
10/2/2011 2.42 4401.70 4398.00 28.26
10/2/2011 2.42 4401.70 4398.00 28.25
10/3/2011 2.42 4401.80 4398.10 28.25
10/4/2011 2.43 4401.80 4398.10 28.24
10/4/2011 2.43 4401.80 4398.10 28.24
10/5/2011 2.43 4401.80 4398.10 28.23
10/5/2011 2.43 4401.80 4398.10 28.22
10/6/2011 2.43 4401.80 4398.10 28.22
10/6/2011 2.43 4401.80 4398.10 28.21
10/7/2011 2.44 4401.80 4398.10 28.21
10/7/2011 2.44 4401.80 4398.10 28.20
10/8/2011 2.44 4401.80 4398.10 28.19
10/9/2011 2.44 4401.80 4398.20 28.19
10/9/2011 2.44 4401.80 4398.20 28.18
10/10/2011 2.44 4401.80 4398.20 28.18
10/10/2011 2.44 4401.80 4398.20 28.17
10/11/2011 2.45 4401.80 4398.20 28.16
10/11/2011 2.45 4401.80 4398.20 28.16
10/12/2011 2.45 4401.80 4398.20 28.15
10/12/2011 2.45 4401.90 4398.20 28.15
10/13/2011 2.45 4401.90 4398.20 28.14
10/14/2011 2.45 4401.90 4398.20 28.13
10/14/2011 2.45 4401.90 4398.20 28.13
10/15/2011 2.46 4401.90 4398.30 28.12
10/15/2011 2.46 4401.90 4398.30 28.12
33 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
10/16/2011 2.46 4401.90 4398.30 28.11
10/16/2011 2.46 4401.90 4398.30 28.10
10/17/2011 2.46 4401.90 4398.30 28.10
10/17/2011 2.46 4401.90 4398.30 28.09
10/18/2011 2.47 4401.90 4398.30 28.09
10/19/2011 2.47 4401.90 4398.30 28.08
10/19/2011 2.47 4401.90 4398.30 28.07
10/20/2011 2.47 4401.90 4398.30 28.07
10/20/2011 2.47 4401.90 4398.40 28.06
10/21/2011 2.47 4401.90 4398.40 28.06
10/21/2011 2.47 4402.00 4398.40 28.05
10/22/2011 2.48 4402.00 4398.40 28.04
10/22/2011 2.48 4402.00 4398.40 28.04
10/23/2011 2.48 4402.00 4398.40 28.03
10/24/2011 2.48 4402.00 4398.40 28.03
10/24/2011 2.48 4402.00 4398.40 28.02
10/25/2011 2.48 4402.00 4398.40 28.01
10/25/2011 2.49 4402.00 4398.40 28.01
10/26/2011 2.49 4402.00 4398.50 28.00
10/26/2011 2.49 4402.00 4398.50 28.00
10/27/2011 2.49 4402.00 4398.50 27.99
10/27/2011 2.49 4402.00 4398.50 27.99
10/28/2011 2.49 4402.00 4398.50 27.98
10/29/2011 2.49 4402.00 4398.50 27.97
10/29/2011 2.50 4402.00 4398.50 27.97
10/30/2011 2.50 4402.00 4398.50 27.96
10/30/2011 2.50 4402.00 4398.50 27.96
10/31/2011 2.50 4402.10 4398.50 27.95
10/31/2011 2.50 4402.10 4398.60 27.94
11/1/2011 2.50 4402.10 4398.60 27.94
11/1/2011 2.51 4402.10 4398.60 27.93
11/2/2011 2.51 4402.10 4398.60 27.92
11/3/2011 2.51 4402.10 4398.60 27.91
11/3/2011 2.51 4402.10 4398.60 27.91
11/4/2011 2.51 4402.10 4398.60 27.90
11/4/2011 2.51 4402.10 4398.60 27.89
11/5/2011 2.51 4402.10 4398.60 27.88
11/5/2011 2.52 4402.10 4398.60 27.88
11/6/2011 2.52 4402.10 4398.70 27.87
11/6/2011 2.52 4402.10 4398.70 27.86
11/7/2011 2.52 4402.10 4398.70 27.85
11/8/2011 2.52 4402.20 4398.70 27.84
11/8/2011 2.52 4402.20 4398.70 27.84
11/9/2011 2.52 4402.20 4398.70 27.83
11/9/2011 2.53 4402.20 4398.70 27.82
11/10/2011 2.53 4402.20 4398.70 27.81
11/10/2011 2.53 4402.20 4398.70 27.81
11/11/2011 2.53 4402.20 4398.70 27.80
11/11/2011 2.53 4402.20 4398.80 27.79
34 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
11/12/2011 2.53 4402.20 4398.80 27.78
11/13/2011 2.54 4402.20 4398.80 27.77
11/13/2011 2.54 4402.20 4398.80 27.77
11/14/2011 2.54 4402.20 4398.80 27.76
11/14/2011 2.54 4402.20 4398.80 27.75
11/15/2011 2.54 4402.30 4398.80 27.74
11/15/2011 2.54 4402.30 4398.80 27.74
11/16/2011 2.54 4402.30 4398.80 27.73
11/16/2011 2.55 4402.30 4398.80 27.72
11/17/2011 2.55 4402.30 4398.80 27.71
11/18/2011 2.55 4402.30 4398.90 27.71
11/18/2011 2.55 4402.30 4398.90 27.70
11/19/2011 2.55 4402.30 4398.90 27.69
11/19/2011 2.55 4402.30 4398.90 27.68
11/20/2011 2.56 4402.30 4398.90 27.67
11/20/2011 2.56 4402.30 4398.90 27.67
11/21/2011 2.56 4402.30 4398.90 27.66
11/21/2011 2.56 4402.30 4398.90 27.65
11/22/2011 2.56 4402.40 4398.90 27.64
11/23/2011 2.56 4402.40 4398.90 27.64
11/23/2011 2.56 4402.40 4399.00 27.63
11/24/2011 2.57 4402.40 4399.00 27.62
11/24/2011 2.57 4402.40 4399.00 27.61
11/25/2011 2.57 4402.40 4399.00 27.60
11/25/2011 2.57 4402.40 4399.00 27.60
11/26/2011 2.57 4402.40 4399.00 27.59
11/26/2011 2.57 4402.40 4399.00 27.58
11/27/2011 2.57 4402.40 4399.00 27.57
11/28/2011 2.58 4402.40 4399.00 27.57
11/28/2011 2.58 4402.40 4399.00 27.56
11/29/2011 2.58 4402.50 4399.10 27.55
11/29/2011 2.58 4402.50 4399.10 27.54
11/30/2011 2.58 4402.50 4399.10 27.53
11/30/2011 2.58 4402.50 4399.10 27.53
12/1/2011 2.59 4402.50 4399.10 27.52
12/1/2011 2.59 4402.50 4399.10 27.51
12/2/2011 2.59 4402.50 4399.10 27.50
12/3/2011 2.59 4402.50 4399.10 27.49
12/3/2011 2.59 4402.50 4399.10 27.48
12/4/2011 2.59 4402.50 4399.10 27.47
12/4/2011 2.59 4402.50 4399.20 27.46
12/5/2011 2.60 4402.50 4399.20 27.45
12/5/2011 2.60 4402.60 4399.20 27.44
12/6/2011 2.60 4402.60 4399.20 27.43
12/6/2011 2.60 4402.60 4399.20 27.42
12/7/2011 2.60 4402.60 4399.20 27.41
12/8/2011 2.60 4402.60 4399.20 27.40
12/8/2011 2.61 4402.60 4399.20 27.39
12/9/2011 2.61 4402.60 4399.20 27.38
35 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
12/9/2011 2.61 4402.60 4399.20 27.37
12/10/2011 2.61 4402.60 4399.30 27.36
12/10/2011 2.61 4402.60 4399.30 27.35
12/11/2011 2.61 4402.70 4399.30 27.34
12/11/2011 2.61 4402.70 4399.30 27.33
12/12/2011 2.62 4402.70 4399.30 27.32
12/13/2011 2.62 4402.70 4399.30 27.31
12/13/2011 2.62 4402.70 4399.30 27.30
12/14/2011 2.62 4402.70 4399.30 27.30
12/14/2011 2.62 4402.70 4399.30 27.29
12/15/2011 2.62 4402.70 4399.30 27.28
12/15/2011 2.63 4402.70 4399.40 27.27
12/16/2011 2.63 4402.70 4399.40 27.26
12/16/2011 2.63 4402.80 4399.40 27.25
12/17/2011 2.63 4402.80 4399.40 27.24
12/18/2011 2.63 4402.80 4399.40 27.23
12/18/2011 2.63 4402.80 4399.40 27.22
12/19/2011 2.63 4402.80 4399.40 27.21
12/19/2011 2.64 4402.80 4399.40 27.20
12/20/2011 2.64 4402.80 4399.40 27.19
12/20/2011 2.64 4402.80 4399.40 27.18
12/21/2011 2.64 4402.80 4399.40 27.17
12/21/2011 2.64 4402.80 4399.50 27.16
12/22/2011 2.64 4402.90 4399.50 27.15
12/23/2011 2.64 4402.90 4399.50 27.14
12/23/2011 2.65 4402.90 4399.50 27.13
12/24/2011 2.65 4402.90 4399.50 27.12
12/24/2011 2.65 4402.90 4399.50 27.11
12/25/2011 2.65 4402.90 4399.50 27.10
12/25/2011 2.65 4402.90 4399.50 27.09
12/26/2011 2.65 4402.90 4399.50 27.08
12/26/2011 2.66 4402.90 4399.50 27.07
12/27/2011 2.66 4402.90 4399.60 27.06
12/28/2011 2.66 4402.90 4399.60 27.05
12/28/2011 2.66 4403.00 4399.60 27.04
12/29/2011 2.66 4403.00 4399.60 27.03
12/29/2011 2.66 4403.00 4399.60 27.02
12/30/2011 2.66 4403.00 4399.60 27.01
12/30/2011 2.67 4403.00 4399.60 27.00
12/31/2011 2.67 4403.00 4399.60 26.99
12/31/2011 2.67 4403.00 4399.60 26.98
1/1/2012 2.67 4403.00 4399.60 26.97
1/2/2012 2.67 4403.00 4399.70 26.96
1/2/2012 2.67 4403.00 4399.70 26.95
1/3/2012 2.68 4403.10 4399.70 26.94
1/3/2012 2.68 4403.10 4399.70 26.93
1/4/2012 2.68 4403.10 4399.70 26.92
1/4/2012 2.68 4403.10 4399.70 26.91
1/5/2012 2.68 4403.10 4399.70 26.90
36 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
1/5/2012 2.68 4403.10 4399.70 26.89
1/6/2012 2.68 4403.10 4399.70 26.88
1/7/2012 2.69 4403.10 4399.70 26.87
1/7/2012 2.69 4403.10 4399.80 26.85
1/8/2012 2.69 4403.20 4399.80 26.84
1/8/2012 2.69 4403.20 4399.80 26.83
1/9/2012 2.69 4403.20 4399.80 26.82
1/9/2012 2.69 4403.20 4399.80 26.81
1/10/2012 2.70 4403.20 4399.80 26.80
1/10/2012 2.70 4403.20 4399.80 26.79
1/11/2012 2.70 4403.20 4399.80 26.78
1/12/2012 2.70 4403.20 4399.80 26.77
1/12/2012 2.70 4403.20 4399.80 26.76
1/13/2012 2.70 4403.30 4399.90 26.75
1/13/2012 2.70 4403.30 4399.90 26.73
1/14/2012 2.71 4403.30 4399.90 26.72
1/14/2012 2.71 4403.30 4399.90 26.71
1/15/2012 2.71 4403.30 4399.90 26.70
1/15/2012 2.71 4403.30 4399.90 26.69
1/16/2012 2.71 4403.30 4399.90 26.68
1/17/2012 2.71 4403.30 4399.90 26.67
1/17/2012 2.71 4403.30 4399.90 26.66
1/18/2012 2.72 4403.40 4399.90 26.65
1/18/2012 2.72 4403.40 4400.00 26.64
1/19/2012 2.72 4403.40 4400.00 26.63
1/19/2012 2.72 4403.40 4400.00 26.62
1/20/2012 2.72 4403.40 4400.00 26.60
1/20/2012 2.72 4403.40 4400.00 26.59
1/21/2012 2.73 4403.40 4400.00 26.58
1/22/2012 2.73 4403.40 4400.00 26.57
1/22/2012 2.73 4403.40 4400.00 26.56
1/23/2012 2.73 4403.40 4400.00 26.55
1/23/2012 2.73 4403.50 4400.00 26.54
1/24/2012 2.73 4403.50 4400.00 26.53
1/24/2012 2.73 4403.50 4400.00 26.52
1/25/2012 2.74 4403.50 4400.10 26.51
1/25/2012 2.74 4403.50 4400.10 26.50
1/26/2012 2.74 4403.50 4400.10 26.49
1/27/2012 2.74 4403.50 4400.10 26.47
1/27/2012 2.74 4403.50 4400.10 26.46
1/28/2012 2.74 4403.50 4400.10 26.45
1/28/2012 2.75 4403.60 4400.10 26.44
1/29/2012 2.75 4403.60 4400.10 26.43
1/29/2012 2.75 4403.60 4400.10 26.42
1/30/2012 2.75 4403.60 4400.10 26.41
1/30/2012 2.75 4403.60 4400.10 26.40
1/31/2012 2.75 4403.60 4400.10 26.39
2/1/2012 2.75 4403.60 4400.10 26.38
2/1/2012 2.76 4403.60 4400.20 26.37
37 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
2/2/2012 2.76 4403.60 4400.20 26.36
2/2/2012 2.76 4403.70 4400.20 26.34
2/3/2012 2.76 4403.70 4400.20 26.33
2/3/2012 2.76 4403.70 4400.20 26.32
2/4/2012 2.76 4403.70 4400.20 26.31
2/4/2012 2.77 4403.70 4400.20 26.30
2/5/2012 2.77 4403.70 4400.20 26.29
2/6/2012 2.77 4403.70 4400.20 26.28
2/6/2012 2.77 4403.70 4400.20 26.27
2/7/2012 2.77 4403.70 4400.20 26.26
2/7/2012 2.77 4403.80 4400.20 26.25
2/8/2012 2.77 4403.80 4400.20 26.23
2/8/2012 2.78 4403.80 4400.30 26.22
2/9/2012 2.78 4403.80 4400.30 26.21
2/9/2012 2.78 4403.80 4400.30 26.20
2/10/2012 2.78 4403.80 4400.30 26.19
2/11/2012 2.78 4403.80 4400.30 26.18
2/11/2012 2.78 4403.80 4400.30 26.17
2/12/2012 2.78 4403.80 4400.30 26.16
2/12/2012 2.79 4403.90 4400.30 26.15
2/13/2012 2.79 4403.90 4400.30 26.14
2/13/2012 2.79 4403.90 4400.30 26.12
2/14/2012 2.79 4403.90 4400.30 26.11
2/14/2012 2.79 4403.90 4400.30 26.10
2/15/2012 2.79 4403.90 4400.30 26.09
2/16/2012 2.80 4403.90 4400.40 26.08
2/16/2012 2.80 4403.90 4400.40 26.07
2/17/2012 2.80 4403.90 4400.40 26.06
2/17/2012 2.80 4404.00 4400.40 26.05
2/18/2012 2.80 4404.00 4400.40 26.04
2/18/2012 2.80 4404.00 4400.40 26.03
2/19/2012 2.80 4404.00 4400.40 26.01
2/19/2012 2.81 4404.00 4400.40 26.00
2/20/2012 2.81 4404.00 4400.40 25.99
2/21/2012 2.81 4404.00 4400.40 25.98
2/21/2012 2.81 4404.00 4400.40 25.97
2/22/2012 2.81 4404.00 4400.40 25.96
2/22/2012 2.81 4404.10 4400.40 25.95
2/23/2012 2.82 4404.10 4400.50 25.94
2/23/2012 2.82 4404.10 4400.50 25.93
2/24/2012 2.82 4404.10 4400.50 25.92
2/24/2012 2.82 4404.10 4400.50 25.91
2/25/2012 2.82 4404.10 4400.50 25.89
2/26/2012 2.82 4404.10 4400.50 25.88
2/26/2012 2.82 4404.10 4400.50 25.87
2/27/2012 2.83 4404.10 4400.50 25.86
2/27/2012 2.83 4404.10 4400.50 25.85
2/28/2012 2.83 4404.20 4400.50 25.84
2/28/2012 2.83 4404.20 4400.50 25.83
38 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
2/29/2012 2.83 4404.20 4400.50 25.82
2/29/2012 2.83 4404.20 4400.50 25.81
3/1/2012 2.84 4404.20 4400.60 25.80
3/2/2012 2.84 4404.20 4400.60 25.78
3/2/2012 2.84 4404.20 4400.60 25.77
3/3/2012 2.84 4404.20 4400.60 25.76
3/3/2012 2.84 4404.30 4400.60 25.75
3/4/2012 2.84 4404.30 4400.60 25.74
3/4/2012 2.84 4404.30 4400.60 25.73
3/5/2012 2.85 4404.30 4400.60 25.71
3/5/2012 2.85 4404.30 4400.60 25.70
3/6/2012 2.85 4404.30 4400.60 25.69
3/7/2012 2.85 4404.30 4400.60 25.68
3/7/2012 2.85 4404.30 4400.60 25.67
3/8/2012 2.85 4404.30 4400.60 25.66
3/8/2012 2.85 4404.40 4400.70 25.64
3/9/2012 2.86 4404.40 4400.70 25.63
3/9/2012 2.86 4404.40 4400.70 25.62
3/10/2012 2.86 4404.40 4400.70 25.61
3/10/2012 2.86 4404.40 4400.70 25.60
3/11/2012 2.86 4404.40 4400.70 25.59
3/12/2012 2.86 4404.40 4400.70 25.57
3/12/2012 2.87 4404.40 4400.70 25.56
3/13/2012 2.87 4404.40 4400.70 25.55
3/13/2012 2.87 4404.50 4400.70 25.54
3/14/2012 2.87 4404.50 4400.70 25.53
3/14/2012 2.87 4404.50 4400.70 25.52
3/15/2012 2.87 4404.50 4400.70 25.50
3/15/2012 2.87 4404.50 4400.80 25.49
3/16/2012 2.88 4404.50 4400.80 25.48
3/17/2012 2.88 4404.50 4400.80 25.47
3/17/2012 2.88 4404.50 4400.80 25.46
3/18/2012 2.88 4404.60 4400.80 25.45
3/18/2012 2.88 4404.60 4400.80 25.44
3/19/2012 2.88 4404.60 4400.80 25.42
3/19/2012 2.89 4404.60 4400.80 25.41
3/20/2012 2.89 4404.60 4400.80 25.40
3/20/2012 2.89 4404.60 4400.80 25.39
3/21/2012 2.89 4404.60 4400.80 25.38
3/22/2012 2.89 4404.60 4400.80 25.37
3/22/2012 2.89 4404.60 4400.80 25.35
3/23/2012 2.89 4404.70 4400.90 25.34
3/23/2012 2.90 4404.70 4400.90 25.33
3/24/2012 2.90 4404.70 4400.90 25.32
3/24/2012 2.90 4404.70 4400.90 25.31
3/25/2012 2.90 4404.70 4400.90 25.30
3/25/2012 2.90 4404.70 4400.90 25.28
3/26/2012 2.90 4404.70 4400.90 25.27
3/27/2012 2.91 4404.70 4400.90 25.26
39 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
3/27/2012 2.91 4404.80 4400.90 25.25
3/28/2012 2.91 4404.80 4400.90 25.24
3/28/2012 2.91 4404.80 4400.90 25.23
3/29/2012 2.91 4404.80 4400.90 25.21
3/29/2012 2.91 4404.80 4400.90 25.20
3/30/2012 2.91 4404.80 4401.00 25.19
3/30/2012 2.92 4404.80 4401.00 25.18
3/31/2012 2.92 4404.80 4401.00 25.17
4/1/2012 2.92 4404.80 4401.00 25.16
4/1/2012 2.92 4404.90 4401.00 25.15
4/2/2012 2.92 4404.90 4401.00 25.14
4/2/2012 2.92 4404.90 4401.00 25.13
4/3/2012 2.92 4404.90 4401.00 25.12
4/3/2012 2.93 4404.90 4401.00 25.11
4/4/2012 2.93 4404.90 4401.00 25.10
4/4/2012 2.93 4404.90 4401.00 25.09
4/5/2012 2.93 4404.90 4401.00 25.08
4/6/2012 2.93 4404.90 4401.10 25.07
4/6/2012 2.93 4404.90 4401.10 25.06
4/7/2012 2.94 4404.90 4401.10 25.05
4/7/2012 2.94 4405.00 4401.10 25.04
4/8/2012 2.94 4405.00 4401.10 25.03
4/8/2012 2.94 4405.00 4401.10 25.02
4/9/2012 2.94 4405.00 4401.10 25.01
4/9/2012 2.94 4405.00 4401.10 25.00
4/10/2012 2.94 4405.00 4401.10 24.99
4/11/2012 2.95 4405.00 4401.10 24.98
4/11/2012 2.95 4405.00 4401.10 24.97
4/12/2012 2.95 4405.00 4401.10 24.97
4/12/2012 2.95 4405.00 4401.10 24.96
4/13/2012 2.95 4405.10 4401.20 24.95
4/13/2012 2.95 4405.10 4401.20 24.94
4/14/2012 2.96 4405.10 4401.20 24.93
4/14/2012 2.96 4405.10 4401.20 24.92
4/15/2012 2.96 4405.10 4401.20 24.91
4/16/2012 2.96 4405.10 4401.20 24.90
4/16/2012 2.96 4405.10 4401.20 24.89
4/17/2012 2.96 4405.10 4401.20 24.88
4/17/2012 2.96 4405.10 4401.20 24.87
4/18/2012 2.97 4405.10 4401.20 24.86
4/18/2012 2.97 4405.20 4401.20 24.85
4/19/2012 2.97 4405.20 4401.20 24.84
4/19/2012 2.97 4405.20 4401.20 24.83
4/20/2012 2.97 4405.20 4401.30 24.82
4/21/2012 2.97 4405.20 4401.30 24.81
4/21/2012 2.98 4405.20 4401.30 24.80
4/22/2012 2.98 4405.20 4401.30 24.79
4/22/2012 2.98 4405.20 4401.30 24.78
4/23/2012 2.98 4405.20 4401.30 24.77
40 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
4/23/2012 2.98 4405.20 4401.30 24.76
4/24/2012 2.98 4405.20 4401.30 24.75
4/24/2012 2.98 4405.30 4401.30 24.75
4/25/2012 2.99 4405.30 4401.30 24.74
4/26/2012 2.99 4405.30 4401.30 24.73
4/26/2012 2.99 4405.30 4401.30 24.72
4/27/2012 2.99 4405.30 4401.30 24.71
4/27/2012 2.99 4405.30 4401.40 24.70
4/28/2012 2.99 4405.30 4401.40 24.69
4/28/2012 2.99 4405.30 4401.40 24.68
4/29/2012 3.00 4405.30 4401.40 24.67
4/29/2012 3.00 4405.30 4401.40 24.66
4/30/2012 3.00 4405.40 4401.40 24.65
5/1/2012 3.00 4405.40 4401.40 24.64
5/1/2012 3.00 4405.40 4401.40 24.63
5/2/2012 3.00 4405.40 4401.40 24.62
5/2/2012 3.01 4405.40 4401.40 24.61
5/3/2012 3.01 4405.40 4401.40 24.60
5/3/2012 3.01 4405.40 4401.40 24.60
5/4/2012 3.01 4405.40 4401.40 24.59
5/4/2012 3.01 4405.40 4401.50 24.58
5/5/2012 3.01 4405.40 4401.50 24.57
5/6/2012 3.01 4405.40 4401.50 24.56
5/6/2012 3.02 4405.40 4401.50 24.55
5/7/2012 3.02 4405.50 4401.50 24.54
5/7/2012 3.02 4405.50 4401.50 24.53
5/8/2012 3.02 4405.50 4401.50 24.52
5/8/2012 3.02 4405.50 4401.50 24.51
5/9/2012 3.02 4405.50 4401.50 24.51
5/9/2012 3.03 4405.50 4401.50 24.50
5/10/2012 3.03 4405.50 4401.50 24.49
5/11/2012 3.03 4405.50 4401.50 24.48
5/11/2012 3.03 4405.50 4401.50 24.47
5/12/2012 3.03 4405.50 4401.60 24.46
5/12/2012 3.03 4405.50 4401.60 24.45
5/13/2012 3.03 4405.60 4401.60 24.44
5/13/2012 3.04 4405.60 4401.60 24.43
5/14/2012 3.04 4405.60 4401.60 24.42
5/14/2012 3.04 4405.60 4401.60 24.42
5/15/2012 3.04 4405.60 4401.60 24.41
5/16/2012 3.04 4405.60 4401.60 24.40
5/16/2012 3.04 4405.60 4401.60 24.39
5/17/2012 3.04 4405.60 4401.60 24.38
5/17/2012 3.05 4405.60 4401.60 24.37
5/18/2012 3.05 4405.60 4401.60 24.36
5/18/2012 3.05 4405.60 4401.60 24.35
5/19/2012 3.05 4405.70 4401.70 24.34
5/19/2012 3.05 4405.70 4401.70 24.34
5/20/2012 3.05 4405.70 4401.70 24.33
41 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
5/21/2012 3.06 4405.70 4401.70 24.32
5/21/2012 3.06 4405.70 4401.70 24.31
5/22/2012 3.06 4405.70 4401.70 24.30
5/22/2012 3.06 4405.70 4401.70 24.29
5/23/2012 3.06 4405.70 4401.70 24.28
5/23/2012 3.06 4405.70 4401.70 24.27
5/24/2012 3.06 4405.70 4401.70 24.26
5/24/2012 3.07 4405.70 4401.70 24.25
5/25/2012 3.07 4405.80 4401.70 24.25
5/26/2012 3.07 4405.80 4401.70 24.24
5/26/2012 3.07 4405.80 4401.80 24.23
5/27/2012 3.07 4405.80 4401.80 24.22
5/27/2012 3.07 4405.80 4401.80 24.21
5/28/2012 3.08 4405.80 4401.80 24.20
5/28/2012 3.08 4405.80 4401.80 24.19
5/29/2012 3.08 4405.80 4401.80 24.18
5/29/2012 3.08 4405.80 4401.80 24.17
5/30/2012 3.08 4405.80 4401.80 24.17
5/31/2012 3.08 4405.80 4401.80 24.16
5/31/2012 3.08 4405.90 4401.80 24.15
6/1/2012 3.09 4405.90 4401.80 24.14
6/1/2012 3.09 4405.90 4401.80 24.13
6/2/2012 3.09 4405.90 4401.80 24.12
6/2/2012 3.09 4405.90 4401.90 24.12
6/3/2012 3.09 4405.90 4401.90 24.11
6/3/2012 3.09 4405.90 4401.90 24.10
6/4/2012 3.10 4405.90 4401.90 24.10
6/5/2012 3.10 4405.90 4401.90 24.09
6/5/2012 3.10 4405.90 4401.90 24.08
6/6/2012 3.10 4405.90 4401.90 24.08
6/6/2012 3.10 4405.90 4401.90 24.07
6/7/2012 3.10 4405.90 4401.90 24.06
6/7/2012 3.10 4405.90 4401.90 24.06
6/8/2012 3.11 4406.00 4401.90 24.05
6/8/2012 3.11 4406.00 4401.90 24.04
6/9/2012 3.11 4406.00 4401.90 24.03
6/10/2012 3.11 4406.00 4402.00 24.03
6/10/2012 3.11 4406.00 4402.00 24.02
6/11/2012 3.11 4406.00 4402.00 24.01
6/11/2012 3.11 4406.00 4402.00 24.01
6/12/2012 3.12 4406.00 4402.00 24.00
6/12/2012 3.12 4406.00 4402.00 23.99
6/13/2012 3.12 4406.00 4402.00 23.99
6/13/2012 3.12 4406.00 4402.00 23.98
6/14/2012 3.12 4406.00 4402.00 23.97
6/15/2012 3.12 4406.00 4402.00 23.96
6/15/2012 3.13 4406.00 4402.00 23.96
6/16/2012 3.13 4406.00 4402.00 23.95
6/16/2012 3.13 4406.10 4402.00 23.94
42 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
6/17/2012 3.13 4406.10 4402.10 23.94
6/17/2012 3.13 4406.10 4402.10 23.93
6/18/2012 3.13 4406.10 4402.10 23.92
6/18/2012 3.13 4406.10 4402.10 23.92
6/19/2012 3.14 4406.10 4402.10 23.91
6/20/2012 3.14 4406.10 4402.10 23.90
6/20/2012 3.14 4406.10 4402.10 23.90
6/21/2012 3.14 4406.10 4402.10 23.89
6/21/2012 3.14 4406.10 4402.10 23.88
6/22/2012 3.14 4406.10 4402.10 23.87
6/22/2012 3.15 4406.10 4402.10 23.87
6/23/2012 3.15 4406.10 4402.10 23.86
6/23/2012 3.15 4406.10 4402.10 23.85
6/24/2012 3.15 4406.20 4402.20 23.85
6/25/2012 3.15 4406.20 4402.20 23.84
6/25/2012 3.15 4406.20 4402.20 23.83
6/26/2012 3.15 4406.20 4402.20 23.83
6/26/2012 3.16 4406.20 4402.20 23.82
6/27/2012 3.16 4406.20 4402.20 23.81
6/27/2012 3.16 4406.20 4402.20 23.81
6/28/2012 3.16 4406.20 4402.20 23.80
6/28/2012 3.16 4406.20 4402.20 23.79
6/29/2012 3.16 4406.20 4402.20 23.78
6/30/2012 3.17 4406.20 4402.20 23.78
6/30/2012 3.17 4406.20 4402.20 23.77
7/1/2012 3.17 4406.20 4402.20 23.76
7/1/2012 3.17 4406.20 4402.30 23.76
7/2/2012 3.17 4406.20 4402.30 23.76
7/2/2012 3.17 4406.20 4402.30 23.76
7/3/2012 3.17 4406.20 4402.30 23.75
7/3/2012 3.18 4406.30 4402.30 23.75
7/4/2012 3.18 4406.30 4402.30 23.75
7/5/2012 3.18 4406.30 4402.30 23.74
7/5/2012 3.18 4406.30 4402.30 23.74
7/6/2012 3.18 4406.30 4402.30 23.74
7/6/2012 3.18 4406.30 4402.30 23.73
7/7/2012 3.18 4406.30 4402.30 23.73
7/7/2012 3.19 4406.30 4402.30 23.73
7/8/2012 3.19 4406.30 4402.30 23.73
7/8/2012 3.19 4406.30 4402.40 23.72
7/9/2012 3.19 4406.30 4402.40 23.72
7/10/2012 3.19 4406.30 4402.40 23.72
7/10/2012 3.19 4406.30 4402.40 23.71
7/11/2012 3.20 4406.30 4402.40 23.71
7/11/2012 3.20 4406.30 4402.40 23.71
7/12/2012 3.20 4406.30 4402.40 23.71
7/12/2012 3.20 4406.30 4402.40 23.70
7/13/2012 3.20 4406.30 4402.40 23.70
7/13/2012 3.20 4406.30 4402.40 23.70
43 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
7/14/2012 3.20 4406.30 4402.40 23.69
7/15/2012 3.21 4406.30 4402.40 23.69
7/15/2012 3.21 4406.30 4402.40 23.69
7/16/2012 3.21 4406.30 4402.50 23.69
7/16/2012 3.21 4406.30 4402.50 23.68
7/17/2012 3.21 4406.30 4402.50 23.68
7/17/2012 3.21 4406.30 4402.50 23.68
7/18/2012 3.22 4406.30 4402.50 23.67
7/18/2012 3.22 4406.30 4402.50 23.67
7/19/2012 3.22 4406.30 4402.50 23.67
7/20/2012 3.22 4406.30 4402.50 23.66
7/20/2012 3.22 4406.30 4402.50 23.66
7/21/2012 3.22 4406.30 4402.50 23.66
7/21/2012 3.22 4406.30 4402.50 23.66
7/22/2012 3.23 4406.30 4402.50 23.65
7/22/2012 3.23 4406.40 4402.50 23.65
7/23/2012 3.23 4406.40 4402.60 23.65
7/23/2012 3.23 4406.40 4402.60 23.64
7/24/2012 3.23 4406.40 4402.60 23.64
7/25/2012 3.23 4406.40 4402.60 23.64
7/25/2012 3.24 4406.40 4402.60 23.64
7/26/2012 3.24 4406.40 4402.60 23.63
7/26/2012 3.24 4406.40 4402.60 23.63
7/27/2012 3.24 4406.40 4402.60 23.63
7/27/2012 3.24 4406.40 4402.60 23.62
7/28/2012 3.24 4406.40 4402.60 23.62
7/28/2012 3.24 4406.40 4402.60 23.62
7/29/2012 3.25 4406.40 4402.60 23.62
7/30/2012 3.25 4406.40 4402.60 23.61
7/30/2012 3.25 4406.40 4402.70 23.61
7/31/2012 3.25 4406.40 4402.70 23.61
7/31/2012 3.25 4406.40 4402.70 23.60
8/1/2012 3.25 4406.40 4402.70 23.60
8/1/2012 3.25 4406.40 4402.70 23.60
8/2/2012 3.26 4406.40 4402.70 23.59
8/2/2012 3.26 4406.40 4402.70 23.59
8/3/2012 3.26 4406.40 4402.70 23.59
8/4/2012 3.26 4406.40 4402.70 23.58
8/4/2012 3.26 4406.40 4402.70 23.58
8/5/2012 3.26 4406.40 4402.70 23.58
8/5/2012 3.27 4406.40 4402.70 23.58
8/6/2012 3.27 4406.40 4402.70 23.57
8/6/2012 3.27 4406.40 4402.80 23.57
8/7/2012 3.27 4406.40 4402.80 23.57
8/7/2012 3.27 4406.40 4402.80 23.56
8/8/2012 3.27 4406.40 4402.80 23.56
8/9/2012 3.27 4406.40 4402.80 23.56
8/9/2012 3.28 4406.40 4402.80 23.55
8/10/2012 3.28 4406.50 4402.80 23.55
44 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
8/10/2012 3.28 4406.50 4402.80 23.55
8/11/2012 3.28 4406.50 4402.80 23.54
8/11/2012 3.28 4406.50 4402.80 23.54
8/12/2012 3.28 4406.50 4402.80 23.54
8/12/2012 3.29 4406.50 4402.80 23.53
8/13/2012 3.29 4406.50 4402.80 23.53
8/14/2012 3.29 4406.50 4402.90 23.53
8/14/2012 3.29 4406.50 4402.90 23.52
8/15/2012 3.29 4406.50 4402.90 23.52
8/15/2012 3.29 4406.50 4402.90 23.52
8/16/2012 3.29 4406.50 4402.90 23.51
8/16/2012 3.30 4406.50 4402.90 23.51
8/17/2012 3.30 4406.50 4402.90 23.51
8/17/2012 3.30 4406.50 4402.90 23.50
8/18/2012 3.30 4406.50 4402.90 23.50
8/19/2012 3.30 4406.50 4402.90 23.50
8/19/2012 3.30 4406.50 4402.90 23.49
8/20/2012 3.31 4406.50 4402.90 23.49
8/20/2012 3.31 4406.50 4402.90 23.49
8/21/2012 3.31 4406.50 4403.00 23.48
8/21/2012 3.31 4406.50 4403.00 23.48
8/22/2012 3.31 4406.50 4403.00 23.48
8/22/2012 3.31 4406.50 4403.00 23.47
8/23/2012 3.31 4406.50 4403.00 23.47
8/24/2012 3.32 4406.50 4403.00 23.47
8/24/2012 3.32 4406.50 4403.00 23.47
8/25/2012 3.32 4406.50 4403.00 23.46
8/25/2012 3.32 4406.50 4403.00 23.46
8/26/2012 3.32 4406.50 4403.00 23.46
8/26/2012 3.32 4406.50 4403.00 23.45
8/27/2012 3.32 4406.60 4403.00 23.45
8/27/2012 3.33 4406.60 4403.00 23.45
8/28/2012 3.33 4406.60 4403.10 23.44
8/29/2012 3.33 4406.60 4403.10 23.44
8/29/2012 3.33 4406.60 4403.10 23.44
8/30/2012 3.33 4406.60 4403.10 23.43
8/30/2012 3.33 4406.60 4403.10 23.43
8/31/2012 3.34 4406.60 4403.10 23.43
8/31/2012 3.34 4406.60 4403.10 23.42
9/1/2012 3.34 4406.60 4403.10 23.42
9/1/2012 3.34 4406.60 4403.10 23.42
9/2/2012 3.34 4406.60 4403.10 23.41
9/3/2012 3.34 4406.60 4403.10 23.41
9/3/2012 3.34 4406.60 4403.10 23.41
9/4/2012 3.35 4406.60 4403.10 23.40
9/4/2012 3.35 4406.60 4403.20 23.40
9/5/2012 3.35 4406.60 4403.20 23.40
9/5/2012 3.35 4406.60 4403.20 23.39
9/6/2012 3.35 4406.60 4403.20 23.39
45 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
9/6/2012 3.35 4406.60 4403.20 23.39
9/7/2012 3.36 4406.60 4403.20 23.38
9/8/2012 3.36 4406.60 4403.20 23.38
9/8/2012 3.36 4406.60 4403.20 23.38
9/9/2012 3.36 4406.60 4403.20 23.37
9/9/2012 3.36 4406.60 4403.20 23.37
9/10/2012 3.36 4406.60 4403.20 23.37
9/10/2012 3.36 4406.60 4403.20 23.36
9/11/2012 3.37 4406.60 4403.20 23.36
9/11/2012 3.37 4406.60 4403.30 23.36
9/12/2012 3.37 4406.60 4403.30 23.35
9/13/2012 3.37 4406.70 4403.30 23.35
9/13/2012 3.37 4406.70 4403.30 23.35
9/14/2012 3.37 4406.70 4403.30 23.34
9/14/2012 3.38 4406.70 4403.30 23.34
9/15/2012 3.38 4406.70 4403.30 23.34
9/15/2012 3.38 4406.70 4403.30 23.33
9/16/2012 3.38 4406.70 4403.30 23.33
9/16/2012 3.38 4406.70 4403.30 23.33
9/17/2012 3.38 4406.70 4403.30 23.32
9/18/2012 3.38 4406.70 4403.30 23.32
9/18/2012 3.39 4406.70 4403.30 23.32
9/19/2012 3.39 4406.70 4403.40 23.31
9/19/2012 3.39 4406.70 4403.40 23.31
9/20/2012 3.39 4406.70 4403.40 23.31
9/20/2012 3.39 4406.70 4403.40 23.30
9/21/2012 3.39 4406.70 4403.40 23.30
9/21/2012 3.39 4406.70 4403.40 23.30
9/22/2012 3.40 4406.70 4403.40 23.29
9/23/2012 3.40 4406.70 4403.40 23.29
9/23/2012 3.40 4406.70 4403.40 23.29
9/24/2012 3.40 4406.70 4403.40 23.28
9/24/2012 3.40 4406.70 4403.40 23.28
9/25/2012 3.40 4406.70 4403.40 23.28
9/25/2012 3.41 4406.70 4403.40 23.27
9/26/2012 3.41 4406.70 4403.50 23.27
9/26/2012 3.41 4406.70 4403.50 23.27
9/27/2012 3.41 4406.70 4403.50 23.26
9/28/2012 3.41 4406.70 4403.50 23.26
9/28/2012 3.41 4406.70 4403.50 23.26
9/29/2012 3.41 4406.70 4403.50 23.25
9/29/2012 3.42 4406.80 4403.50 23.25
9/30/2012 3.42 4406.80 4403.50 23.25
9/30/2012 3.42 4406.80 4403.50 23.24
10/1/2012 3.42 4406.80 4403.50 23.24
10/1/2012 3.42 4406.80 4403.50 23.23
10/2/2012 3.42 4406.80 4403.50 23.23
10/3/2012 3.43 4406.80 4403.50 23.22
10/3/2012 3.43 4406.80 4403.60 23.22
46 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
10/4/2012 3.43 4406.80 4403.60 23.21
10/4/2012 3.43 4406.80 4403.60 23.21
10/5/2012 3.43 4406.80 4403.60 23.20
10/5/2012 3.43 4406.80 4403.60 23.20
10/6/2012 3.43 4406.80 4403.60 23.19
10/6/2012 3.44 4406.80 4403.60 23.19
10/7/2012 3.44 4406.80 4403.60 23.18
10/8/2012 3.44 4406.80 4403.60 23.18
10/8/2012 3.44 4406.80 4403.60 23.17
10/9/2012 3.44 4406.80 4403.60 23.17
10/9/2012 3.44 4406.80 4403.60 23.16
10/10/2012 3.44 4406.80 4403.70 23.16
10/10/2012 3.45 4406.80 4403.70 23.15
10/11/2012 3.45 4406.90 4403.70 23.15
10/11/2012 3.45 4406.90 4403.70 23.14
10/12/2012 3.45 4406.90 4403.70 23.14
10/13/2012 3.45 4406.90 4403.70 23.13
10/13/2012 3.45 4406.90 4403.70 23.13
10/14/2012 3.46 4406.90 4403.70 23.12
10/14/2012 3.46 4406.90 4403.70 23.12
10/15/2012 3.46 4406.90 4403.70 23.11
10/15/2012 3.46 4406.90 4403.70 23.11
10/16/2012 3.46 4406.90 4403.70 23.10
10/16/2012 3.46 4406.90 4403.70 23.10
10/17/2012 3.46 4406.90 4403.80 23.09
10/18/2012 3.47 4406.90 4403.80 23.09
10/18/2012 3.47 4406.90 4403.80 23.08
10/19/2012 3.47 4406.90 4403.80 23.08
10/19/2012 3.47 4406.90 4403.80 23.07
10/20/2012 3.47 4406.90 4403.80 23.07
10/20/2012 3.47 4406.90 4403.80 23.06
10/21/2012 3.48 4406.90 4403.80 23.06
10/21/2012 3.48 4406.90 4403.80 23.05
10/22/2012 3.48 4407.00 4403.80 23.05
10/23/2012 3.48 4407.00 4403.80 23.05
10/23/2012 3.48 4407.00 4403.80 23.04
10/24/2012 3.48 4407.00 4403.80 23.04
10/24/2012 3.48 4407.00 4403.90 23.03
10/25/2012 3.49 4407.00 4403.90 23.03
10/25/2012 3.49 4407.00 4403.90 23.02
10/26/2012 3.49 4407.00 4403.90 23.02
10/26/2012 3.49 4407.00 4403.90 23.01
10/27/2012 3.49 4407.00 4403.90 23.01
10/28/2012 3.49 4407.00 4403.90 23.00
10/28/2012 3.50 4407.00 4403.90 23.00
10/29/2012 3.50 4407.00 4403.90 22.99
10/29/2012 3.50 4407.00 4403.90 22.99
10/30/2012 3.50 4407.00 4403.90 22.98
10/30/2012 3.50 4407.00 4403.90 22.98
47 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
10/31/2012 3.50 4407.00 4403.90 22.97
10/31/2012 3.50 4407.00 4404.00 22.97
11/1/2012 3.51 4407.00 4404.00 22.96
11/2/2012 3.51 4407.00 4404.00 22.95
11/2/2012 3.51 4407.10 4404.00 22.95
11/3/2012 3.51 4407.10 4404.00 22.94
11/3/2012 3.51 4407.10 4404.00 22.93
11/4/2012 3.51 4407.10 4404.00 22.92
11/4/2012 3.51 4407.10 4404.00 22.92
11/5/2012 3.52 4407.10 4404.00 22.91
11/5/2012 3.52 4407.10 4404.00 22.90
11/6/2012 3.52 4407.10 4404.00 22.90
11/7/2012 3.52 4407.10 4404.00 22.89
11/7/2012 3.52 4407.10 4404.00 22.88
11/8/2012 3.52 4407.10 4404.10 22.88
11/8/2012 3.53 4407.10 4404.10 22.87
11/9/2012 3.53 4407.10 4404.10 22.86
11/9/2012 3.53 4407.10 4404.10 22.85
11/10/2012 3.53 4407.20 4404.10 22.85
11/10/2012 3.53 4407.20 4404.10 22.84
11/11/2012 3.53 4407.20 4404.10 22.83
11/12/2012 3.53 4407.20 4404.10 22.83
11/12/2012 3.54 4407.20 4404.10 22.82
11/13/2012 3.54 4407.20 4404.10 22.81
11/13/2012 3.54 4407.20 4404.10 22.80
11/14/2012 3.54 4407.20 4404.10 22.80
11/14/2012 3.54 4407.20 4404.10 22.79
11/15/2012 3.54 4407.20 4404.20 22.78
11/15/2012 3.55 4407.20 4404.20 22.78
11/16/2012 3.55 4407.20 4404.20 22.77
11/17/2012 3.55 4407.20 4404.20 22.76
11/17/2012 3.55 4407.20 4404.20 22.75
11/18/2012 3.55 4407.30 4404.20 22.75
11/18/2012 3.55 4407.30 4404.20 22.74
11/19/2012 3.55 4407.30 4404.20 22.73
11/19/2012 3.56 4407.30 4404.20 22.73
11/20/2012 3.56 4407.30 4404.20 22.72
11/20/2012 3.56 4407.30 4404.20 22.71
11/21/2012 3.56 4407.30 4404.20 22.70
11/22/2012 3.56 4407.30 4404.20 22.70
11/22/2012 3.56 4407.30 4404.30 22.69
11/23/2012 3.57 4407.30 4404.30 22.68
11/23/2012 3.57 4407.30 4404.30 22.68
11/24/2012 3.57 4407.30 4404.30 22.67
11/24/2012 3.57 4407.30 4404.30 22.66
11/25/2012 3.57 4407.30 4404.30 22.66
11/25/2012 3.57 4407.40 4404.30 22.65
11/26/2012 3.57 4407.40 4404.30 22.64
11/27/2012 3.58 4407.40 4404.30 22.63
48 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
11/27/2012 3.58 4407.40 4404.30 22.63
11/28/2012 3.58 4407.40 4404.30 22.62
11/28/2012 3.58 4407.40 4404.30 22.61
11/29/2012 3.58 4407.40 4404.30 22.61
11/29/2012 3.58 4407.40 4404.40 22.60
11/30/2012 3.58 4407.40 4404.40 22.59
11/30/2012 3.59 4407.40 4404.40 22.58
12/1/2012 3.59 4407.40 4404.40 22.58
12/2/2012 3.59 4407.40 4404.40 22.57
12/2/2012 3.59 4407.40 4404.40 22.56
12/3/2012 3.59 4407.50 4404.40 22.55
12/3/2012 3.59 4407.50 4404.40 22.54
12/4/2012 3.60 4407.50 4404.40 22.53
12/4/2012 3.60 4407.50 4404.40 22.52
12/5/2012 3.60 4407.50 4404.40 22.51
12/5/2012 3.60 4407.50 4404.40 22.50
12/6/2012 3.60 4407.50 4404.40 22.49
12/7/2012 3.60 4407.50 4404.50 22.48
12/7/2012 3.60 4407.50 4404.50 22.47
12/8/2012 3.61 4407.50 4404.50 22.47
12/8/2012 3.61 4407.50 4404.50 22.46
12/9/2012 3.61 4407.60 4404.50 22.45
12/9/2012 3.61 4407.60 4404.50 22.44
12/10/2012 3.61 4407.60 4404.50 22.43
12/10/2012 3.61 4407.60 4404.50 22.42
12/11/2012 3.62 4407.60 4404.50 22.41
12/12/2012 3.62 4407.60 4404.50 22.40
12/12/2012 3.62 4407.60 4404.50 22.39
12/13/2012 3.62 4407.60 4404.50 22.38
12/13/2012 3.62 4407.60 4404.50 22.37
12/14/2012 3.62 4407.60 4404.60 22.36
12/14/2012 3.62 4407.60 4404.60 22.35
12/15/2012 3.63 4407.70 4404.60 22.34
12/15/2012 3.63 4407.70 4404.60 22.33
12/16/2012 3.63 4407.70 4404.60 22.33
12/17/2012 3.63 4407.70 4404.60 22.32
12/17/2012 3.63 4407.70 4404.60 22.31
12/18/2012 3.63 4407.70 4404.60 22.30
12/18/2012 3.64 4407.70 4404.60 22.29
12/19/2012 3.64 4407.70 4404.60 22.28
12/19/2012 3.64 4407.70 4404.60 22.27
12/20/2012 3.64 4407.70 4404.60 22.26
12/20/2012 3.64 4407.70 4404.60 22.25
12/21/2012 3.64 4407.80 4404.70 22.24
12/22/2012 3.64 4407.80 4404.70 22.23
12/22/2012 3.65 4407.80 4404.70 22.22
12/23/2012 3.65 4407.80 4404.70 22.21
12/23/2012 3.65 4407.80 4404.70 22.20
12/24/2012 3.65 4407.80 4404.70 22.20
49 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
12/24/2012 3.65 4407.80 4404.70 22.19
12/25/2012 3.65 4407.80 4404.70 22.18
12/25/2012 3.65 4407.80 4404.70 22.17
12/26/2012 3.66 4407.80 4404.70 22.16
12/27/2012 3.66 4407.90 4404.70 22.15
12/27/2012 3.66 4407.90 4404.70 22.14
12/28/2012 3.66 4407.90 4404.70 22.13
12/28/2012 3.66 4407.90 4404.80 22.12
12/29/2012 3.66 4407.90 4404.80 22.11
12/29/2012 3.67 4407.90 4404.80 22.10
12/30/2012 3.67 4407.90 4404.80 22.09
12/30/2012 3.67 4407.90 4404.80 22.08
12/31/2012 3.67 4407.90 4404.80 22.07
1/1/2013 3.67 4407.90 4404.80 22.07
1/1/2013 3.67 4407.90 4404.80 22.05
1/2/2013 3.67 4408.00 4404.80 22.04
1/2/2013 3.68 4408.00 4404.80 22.03
1/3/2013 3.68 4408.00 4404.80 22.02
1/3/2013 3.68 4408.00 4404.80 22.01
1/4/2013 3.68 4408.00 4404.80 22.00
1/4/2013 3.68 4408.00 4404.90 21.99
1/5/2013 3.68 4408.00 4404.90 21.98
1/6/2013 3.69 4408.00 4404.90 21.97
1/6/2013 3.69 4408.00 4404.90 21.96
1/7/2013 3.69 4408.10 4404.90 21.95
1/7/2013 3.69 4408.10 4404.90 21.94
1/8/2013 3.69 4408.10 4404.90 21.93
1/8/2013 3.69 4408.10 4404.90 21.92
1/9/2013 3.69 4408.10 4404.90 21.91
1/9/2013 3.70 4408.10 4404.90 21.90
1/10/2013 3.70 4408.10 4404.90 21.89
1/11/2013 3.70 4408.10 4404.90 21.88
1/11/2013 3.70 4408.10 4404.90 21.87
1/12/2013 3.70 4408.10 4405.00 21.85
1/12/2013 3.70 4408.20 4405.00 21.84
1/13/2013 3.71 4408.20 4405.00 21.83
1/13/2013 3.71 4408.20 4405.00 21.82
1/14/2013 3.71 4408.20 4405.00 21.81
1/14/2013 3.71 4408.20 4405.00 21.80
1/15/2013 3.71 4408.20 4405.00 21.79
1/16/2013 3.71 4408.20 4405.00 21.78
1/16/2013 3.71 4408.20 4405.00 21.77
1/17/2013 3.72 4408.20 4405.00 21.76
1/17/2013 3.72 4408.30 4405.00 21.75
1/18/2013 3.72 4408.30 4405.00 21.74
1/18/2013 3.72 4408.30 4405.00 21.73
1/19/2013 3.72 4408.30 4405.10 21.72
1/19/2013 3.72 4408.30 4405.10 21.71
1/20/2013 3.72 4408.30 4405.10 21.70
50 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
1/21/2013 3.73 4408.30 4405.10 21.69
1/21/2013 3.73 4408.30 4405.10 21.68
1/22/2013 3.73 4408.30 4405.10 21.67
1/22/2013 3.73 4408.30 4405.10 21.66
1/23/2013 3.73 4408.40 4405.10 21.65
1/23/2013 3.73 4408.40 4405.10 21.63
1/24/2013 3.74 4408.40 4405.10 21.62
1/24/2013 3.74 4408.40 4405.10 21.61
1/25/2013 3.74 4408.40 4405.10 21.60
1/26/2013 3.74 4408.40 4405.10 21.59
1/26/2013 3.74 4408.40 4405.20 21.58
1/27/2013 3.74 4408.40 4405.20 21.57
1/27/2013 3.74 4408.40 4405.20 21.56
1/28/2013 3.75 4408.40 4405.20 21.55
1/28/2013 3.75 4408.50 4405.20 21.54
1/29/2013 3.75 4408.50 4405.20 21.53
1/29/2013 3.75 4408.50 4405.20 21.52
1/30/2013 3.75 4408.50 4405.20 21.51
1/31/2013 3.75 4408.50 4405.20 21.50
1/31/2013 3.76 4408.50 4405.20 21.49
2/1/2013 3.76 4408.50 4405.20 21.48
2/1/2013 3.76 4408.50 4405.20 21.47
2/2/2013 3.76 4408.50 4405.20 21.46
2/2/2013 3.76 4408.60 4405.30 21.45
2/3/2013 3.76 4408.60 4405.30 21.43
2/3/2013 3.76 4408.60 4405.30 21.42
2/4/2013 3.77 4408.60 4405.30 21.41
2/5/2013 3.77 4408.60 4405.30 21.40
2/5/2013 3.77 4408.60 4405.30 21.39
2/6/2013 3.77 4408.60 4405.30 21.38
2/6/2013 3.77 4408.60 4405.30 21.37
2/7/2013 3.77 4408.60 4405.30 21.36
2/7/2013 3.78 4408.70 4405.30 21.35
2/8/2013 3.78 4408.70 4405.30 21.34
2/8/2013 3.78 4408.70 4405.30 21.33
2/9/2013 3.78 4408.70 4405.30 21.32
2/10/2013 3.78 4408.70 4405.40 21.31
2/10/2013 3.78 4408.70 4405.40 21.30
2/11/2013 3.78 4408.70 4405.40 21.29
2/11/2013 3.79 4408.70 4405.40 21.28
2/12/2013 3.79 4408.70 4405.40 21.26
2/12/2013 3.79 4408.70 4405.40 21.25
2/13/2013 3.79 4408.80 4405.40 21.24
2/13/2013 3.79 4408.80 4405.40 21.23
2/14/2013 3.79 4408.80 4405.40 21.22
2/15/2013 3.79 4408.80 4405.40 21.21
2/15/2013 3.80 4408.80 4405.40 21.20
2/16/2013 3.80 4408.80 4405.40 21.19
2/16/2013 3.80 4408.80 4405.40 21.18
51 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
2/17/2013 3.80 4408.80 4405.50 21.17
2/17/2013 3.80 4408.80 4405.50 21.16
2/18/2013 3.80 4408.90 4405.50 21.15
2/18/2013 3.81 4408.90 4405.50 21.14
2/19/2013 3.81 4408.90 4405.50 21.13
2/20/2013 3.81 4408.90 4405.50 21.12
2/20/2013 3.81 4408.90 4405.50 21.10
2/21/2013 3.81 4408.90 4405.50 21.09
2/21/2013 3.81 4408.90 4405.50 21.08
2/22/2013 3.81 4408.90 4405.50 21.07
2/22/2013 3.82 4408.90 4405.50 21.06
2/23/2013 3.82 4408.90 4405.50 21.05
2/23/2013 3.82 4409.00 4405.50 21.04
2/24/2013 3.82 4409.00 4405.60 21.03
2/25/2013 3.82 4409.00 4405.60 21.02
2/25/2013 3.82 4409.00 4405.60 21.01
2/26/2013 3.83 4409.00 4405.60 21.00
2/26/2013 3.83 4409.00 4405.60 20.99
2/27/2013 3.83 4409.00 4405.60 20.98
2/27/2013 3.83 4409.00 4405.60 20.97
2/28/2013 3.83 4409.00 4405.60 20.96
2/28/2013 3.83 4409.10 4405.60 20.95
3/1/2013 3.83 4409.10 4405.60 20.93
3/2/2013 3.84 4409.10 4405.60 20.92
3/2/2013 3.84 4409.10 4405.60 20.91
3/3/2013 3.84 4409.10 4405.60 20.90
3/3/2013 3.84 4409.10 4405.70 20.89
3/4/2013 3.84 4409.10 4405.70 20.88
3/4/2013 3.84 4409.10 4405.70 20.87
3/5/2013 3.84 4409.10 4405.70 20.86
3/5/2013 3.85 4409.20 4405.70 20.84
3/6/2013 3.85 4409.20 4405.70 20.83
3/7/2013 3.85 4409.20 4405.70 20.82
3/7/2013 3.85 4409.20 4405.70 20.81
3/8/2013 3.85 4409.20 4405.70 20.80
3/8/2013 3.85 4409.20 4405.70 20.79
3/9/2013 3.86 4409.20 4405.70 20.78
3/9/2013 3.86 4409.20 4405.70 20.77
3/10/2013 3.86 4409.20 4405.70 20.75
3/10/2013 3.86 4409.30 4405.80 20.74
3/11/2013 3.86 4409.30 4405.80 20.73
3/12/2013 3.86 4409.30 4405.80 20.72
3/12/2013 3.86 4409.30 4405.80 20.71
3/13/2013 3.87 4409.30 4405.80 20.70
3/13/2013 3.87 4409.30 4405.80 20.69
3/14/2013 3.87 4409.30 4405.80 20.68
3/14/2013 3.87 4409.30 4405.80 20.66
3/15/2013 3.87 4409.30 4405.80 20.65
3/15/2013 3.87 4409.40 4405.80 20.64
52 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
3/16/2013 3.88 4409.40 4405.80 20.63
3/17/2013 3.88 4409.40 4405.80 20.62
3/17/2013 3.88 4409.40 4405.80 20.61
3/18/2013 3.88 4409.40 4405.90 20.60
3/18/2013 3.88 4409.40 4405.90 20.59
3/19/2013 3.88 4409.40 4405.90 20.57
3/19/2013 3.88 4409.40 4405.90 20.56
3/20/2013 3.89 4409.40 4405.90 20.55
3/20/2013 3.89 4409.50 4405.90 20.54
3/21/2013 3.89 4409.50 4405.90 20.53
3/22/2013 3.89 4409.50 4405.90 20.52
3/22/2013 3.89 4409.50 4405.90 20.51
3/23/2013 3.89 4409.50 4405.90 20.50
3/23/2013 3.90 4409.50 4405.90 20.48
3/24/2013 3.90 4409.50 4405.90 20.47
3/24/2013 3.90 4409.50 4405.90 20.46
3/25/2013 3.90 4409.60 4406.00 20.45
3/25/2013 3.90 4409.60 4406.00 20.44
3/26/2013 3.90 4409.60 4406.00 20.43
3/27/2013 3.90 4409.60 4406.00 20.42
3/27/2013 3.91 4409.60 4406.00 20.41
3/28/2013 3.91 4409.60 4406.00 20.39
3/28/2013 3.91 4409.60 4406.00 20.38
3/29/2013 3.91 4409.60 4406.00 20.37
3/29/2013 3.91 4409.60 4406.00 20.36
3/30/2013 3.91 4409.70 4406.00 20.35
3/30/2013 3.91 4409.70 4406.00 20.34
3/31/2013 3.92 4409.70 4406.00 20.33
4/1/2013 3.92 4409.70 4406.10 20.32
4/1/2013 3.92 4409.70 4406.10 20.31
4/2/2013 3.92 4409.70 4406.10 20.30
4/2/2013 3.92 4409.70 4406.10 20.29
4/3/2013 3.92 4409.70 4406.10 20.28
4/3/2013 3.93 4409.70 4406.10 20.27
4/4/2013 3.93 4409.70 4406.10 20.26
4/4/2013 3.93 4409.80 4406.10 20.25
4/5/2013 3.93 4409.80 4406.10 20.24
4/6/2013 3.93 4409.80 4406.10 20.23
4/6/2013 3.93 4409.80 4406.10 20.22
4/7/2013 3.93 4409.80 4406.10 20.21
4/7/2013 3.94 4409.80 4406.10 20.20
4/8/2013 3.94 4409.80 4406.20 20.20
4/8/2013 3.94 4409.80 4406.20 20.19
4/9/2013 3.94 4409.80 4406.20 20.18
4/9/2013 3.94 4409.80 4406.20 20.17
4/10/2013 3.94 4409.80 4406.20 20.16
4/11/2013 3.95 4409.90 4406.20 20.15
4/11/2013 3.95 4409.90 4406.20 20.14
4/12/2013 3.95 4409.90 4406.20 20.13
53 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
4/12/2013 3.95 4409.90 4406.20 20.12
4/13/2013 3.95 4409.90 4406.20 20.11
4/13/2013 3.95 4409.90 4406.20 20.10
4/14/2013 3.95 4409.90 4406.20 20.09
4/14/2013 3.96 4409.90 4406.20 20.08
4/15/2013 3.96 4409.90 4406.30 20.08
4/16/2013 3.96 4409.90 4406.30 20.07
4/16/2013 3.96 4409.90 4406.30 20.06
4/17/2013 3.96 4410.00 4406.30 20.05
4/17/2013 3.96 4410.00 4406.30 20.04
4/18/2013 3.97 4410.00 4406.30 20.03
4/18/2013 3.97 4410.00 4406.30 20.02
4/19/2013 3.97 4410.00 4406.30 20.01
4/19/2013 3.97 4410.00 4406.30 20.00
4/20/2013 3.97 4410.00 4406.30 19.99
4/21/2013 3.97 4410.00 4406.30 19.99
4/21/2013 3.97 4410.00 4406.30 19.98
4/22/2013 3.98 4410.00 4406.30 19.97
4/22/2013 3.98 4410.00 4406.40 19.96
4/23/2013 3.98 4410.00 4406.40 19.95
4/23/2013 3.98 4410.10 4406.40 19.95
4/24/2013 3.98 4410.10 4406.40 19.94
4/24/2013 3.98 4410.10 4406.40 19.93
4/25/2013 3.98 4410.10 4406.40 19.92
4/26/2013 3.99 4410.10 4406.40 19.91
4/26/2013 3.99 4410.10 4406.40 19.91
4/27/2013 3.99 4410.10 4406.40 19.90
4/27/2013 3.99 4410.10 4406.40 19.89
4/28/2013 3.99 4410.10 4406.40 19.88
4/28/2013 3.99 4410.10 4406.40 19.87
4/29/2013 4.00 4410.10 4406.40 19.86
4/29/2013 4.00 4410.10 4406.50 19.86
4/30/2013 4.00 4410.20 4406.50 19.85
5/1/2013 4.00 4410.20 4406.50 19.84
5/1/2013 4.00 4410.20 4406.50 19.83
5/2/2013 4.00 4410.20 4406.50 19.83
5/2/2013 4.00 4410.20 4406.50 19.82
5/3/2013 4.01 4410.20 4406.50 19.81
5/3/2013 4.01 4410.20 4406.50 19.80
5/4/2013 4.01 4410.20 4406.50 19.80
5/4/2013 4.01 4410.20 4406.50 19.79
5/5/2013 4.01 4410.20 4406.50 19.78
5/6/2013 4.01 4410.20 4406.50 19.77
5/6/2013 4.02 4410.20 4406.50 19.77
5/7/2013 4.02 4410.20 4406.60 19.76
5/7/2013 4.02 4410.30 4406.60 19.75
5/8/2013 4.02 4410.30 4406.60 19.74
5/8/2013 4.02 4410.30 4406.60 19.74
5/9/2013 4.02 4410.30 4406.60 19.73
54 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
5/9/2013 4.02 4410.30 4406.60 19.72
5/10/2013 4.03 4410.30 4406.60 19.71
5/11/2013 4.03 4410.30 4406.60 19.71
5/11/2013 4.03 4410.30 4406.60 19.70
5/12/2013 4.03 4410.30 4406.60 19.69
5/12/2013 4.03 4410.30 4406.60 19.68
5/13/2013 4.03 4410.30 4406.60 19.68
5/13/2013 4.04 4410.30 4406.60 19.67
5/14/2013 4.04 4410.30 4406.70 19.66
5/14/2013 4.04 4410.30 4406.70 19.65
5/15/2013 4.04 4410.40 4406.70 19.65
5/16/2013 4.04 4410.40 4406.70 19.64
5/16/2013 4.04 4410.40 4406.70 19.63
5/17/2013 4.04 4410.40 4406.70 19.62
5/17/2013 4.05 4410.40 4406.70 19.62
5/18/2013 4.05 4410.40 4406.70 19.61
5/18/2013 4.05 4410.40 4406.70 19.60
5/19/2013 4.05 4410.40 4406.70 19.59
5/19/2013 4.05 4410.40 4406.70 19.59
5/20/2013 4.05 4410.40 4406.70 19.58
5/21/2013 4.05 4410.40 4406.70 19.57
5/21/2013 4.06 4410.40 4406.80 19.56
5/22/2013 4.06 4410.40 4406.80 19.56
5/22/2013 4.06 4410.50 4406.80 19.55
5/23/2013 4.06 4410.50 4406.80 19.54
5/23/2013 4.06 4410.50 4406.80 19.53
5/24/2013 4.06 4410.50 4406.80 19.53
5/24/2013 4.07 4410.50 4406.80 19.52
5/25/2013 4.07 4410.50 4406.80 19.51
5/26/2013 4.07 4410.50 4406.80 19.50
5/26/2013 4.07 4410.50 4406.80 19.50
5/27/2013 4.07 4410.50 4406.80 19.49
5/27/2013 4.07 4410.50 4406.80 19.48
5/28/2013 4.07 4410.50 4406.80 19.47
5/28/2013 4.08 4410.50 4406.90 19.47
5/29/2013 4.08 4410.50 4406.90 19.46
5/29/2013 4.08 4410.60 4406.90 19.45
5/30/2013 4.08 4410.60 4406.90 19.44
5/31/2013 4.08 4410.60 4406.90 19.44
5/31/2013 4.08 4410.60 4406.90 19.43
6/1/2013 4.09 4410.60 4406.90 19.42
6/1/2013 4.09 4410.60 4406.90 19.41
6/2/2013 4.09 4410.60 4406.90 19.41
6/2/2013 4.09 4410.60 4406.90 19.40
6/3/2013 4.09 4410.60 4406.90 19.40
6/3/2013 4.09 4410.60 4406.90 19.39
6/4/2013 4.09 4410.60 4406.90 19.39
6/5/2013 4.10 4410.60 4407.00 19.38
6/5/2013 4.10 4410.60 4407.00 19.38
55 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
6/6/2013 4.10 4410.60 4407.00 19.37
6/6/2013 4.10 4410.60 4407.00 19.36
6/7/2013 4.10 4410.60 4407.00 19.36
6/7/2013 4.10 4410.60 4407.00 19.35
6/8/2013 4.11 4410.70 4407.00 19.35
6/8/2013 4.11 4410.70 4407.00 19.34
6/9/2013 4.11 4410.70 4407.00 19.34
6/10/2013 4.11 4410.70 4407.00 19.33
6/10/2013 4.11 4410.70 4407.00 19.32
6/11/2013 4.11 4410.70 4407.00 19.32
6/11/2013 4.11 4410.70 4407.00 19.31
6/12/2013 4.12 4410.70 4407.10 19.31
6/12/2013 4.12 4410.70 4407.10 19.30
6/13/2013 4.12 4410.70 4407.10 19.30
6/13/2013 4.12 4410.70 4407.10 19.29
6/14/2013 4.12 4410.70 4407.10 19.29
6/15/2013 4.12 4410.70 4407.10 19.28
6/15/2013 4.12 4410.70 4407.10 19.27
6/16/2013 4.13 4410.70 4407.10 19.27
6/16/2013 4.13 4410.70 4407.10 19.26
6/17/2013 4.13 4410.70 4407.10 19.26
6/17/2013 4.13 4410.70 4407.10 19.25
6/18/2013 4.13 4410.80 4407.10 19.25
6/18/2013 4.13 4410.80 4407.10 19.24
6/19/2013 4.14 4410.80 4407.20 19.24
6/20/2013 4.14 4410.80 4407.20 19.23
6/20/2013 4.14 4410.80 4407.20 19.22
6/21/2013 4.14 4410.80 4407.20 19.22
6/21/2013 4.14 4410.80 4407.20 19.21
6/22/2013 4.14 4410.80 4407.20 19.21
6/22/2013 4.14 4410.80 4407.20 19.20
6/23/2013 4.15 4410.80 4407.20 19.20
6/23/2013 4.15 4410.80 4407.20 19.19
6/24/2013 4.15 4410.80 4407.20 19.18
6/25/2013 4.15 4410.80 4407.20 19.18
6/25/2013 4.15 4410.80 4407.20 19.17
6/26/2013 4.15 4410.80 4407.20 19.17
6/26/2013 4.16 4410.80 4407.30 19.16
6/27/2013 4.16 4410.80 4407.30 19.16
6/27/2013 4.16 4410.80 4407.30 19.15
6/28/2013 4.16 4410.90 4407.30 19.15
6/28/2013 4.16 4410.90 4407.30 19.14
6/29/2013 4.16 4410.90 4407.30 19.13
6/30/2013 4.16 4410.90 4407.30 19.13
6/30/2013 4.17 4410.90 4407.30 19.12
7/1/2013 4.17 4410.90 4407.30 19.12
7/1/2013 4.17 4410.90 4407.30 19.12
7/2/2013 4.17 4410.90 4407.30 19.11
7/2/2013 4.17 4410.90 4407.30 19.11
56 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
7/3/2013 4.17 4410.90 4407.30 19.11
7/3/2013 4.18 4410.90 4407.40 19.11
7/4/2013 4.18 4410.90 4407.40 19.11
7/5/2013 4.18 4410.90 4407.40 19.10
7/5/2013 4.18 4410.90 4407.40 19.10
7/6/2013 4.18 4410.90 4407.40 19.10
7/6/2013 4.18 4410.90 4407.40 19.10
7/7/2013 4.18 4410.90 4407.40 19.10
7/7/2013 4.19 4410.90 4407.40 19.10
7/8/2013 4.19 4410.90 4407.40 19.09
7/8/2013 4.19 4410.90 4407.40 19.09
7/9/2013 4.19 4410.90 4407.40 19.09
7/10/2013 4.19 4410.90 4407.40 19.09
7/10/2013 4.19 4410.90 4407.40 19.09
7/11/2013 4.19 4410.90 4407.50 19.08
7/11/2013 4.20 4410.90 4407.50 19.08
7/12/2013 4.20 4410.90 4407.50 19.08
7/12/2013 4.20 4410.90 4407.50 19.08
7/13/2013 4.20 4410.90 4407.50 19.08
7/13/2013 4.20 4410.90 4407.50 19.07
7/14/2013 4.20 4410.90 4407.50 19.07
7/15/2013 4.21 4410.90 4407.50 19.07
7/15/2013 4.21 4410.90 4407.50 19.07
7/16/2013 4.21 4410.90 4407.50 19.07
7/16/2013 4.21 4410.90 4407.50 19.07
7/17/2013 4.21 4410.90 4407.50 19.06
7/17/2013 4.21 4410.90 4407.50 19.06
7/18/2013 4.21 4410.90 4407.60 19.06
7/18/2013 4.22 4410.90 4407.60 19.06
7/19/2013 4.22 4410.90 4407.60 19.06
7/20/2013 4.22 4410.90 4407.60 19.05
7/20/2013 4.22 4410.90 4407.60 19.05
7/21/2013 4.22 4410.90 4407.60 19.05
7/21/2013 4.22 4411.00 4407.60 19.05
7/22/2013 4.23 4411.00 4407.60 19.05
7/22/2013 4.23 4411.00 4407.60 19.05
7/23/2013 4.23 4411.00 4407.60 19.04
7/23/2013 4.23 4411.00 4407.60 19.04
7/24/2013 4.23 4411.00 4407.60 19.04
7/25/2013 4.23 4411.00 4407.60 19.04
7/25/2013 4.23 4411.00 4407.70 19.04
7/26/2013 4.24 4411.00 4407.70 19.03
7/26/2013 4.24 4411.00 4407.70 19.03
7/27/2013 4.24 4411.00 4407.70 19.03
7/27/2013 4.24 4411.00 4407.70 19.03
7/28/2013 4.24 4411.00 4407.70 19.03
7/28/2013 4.24 4411.00 4407.70 19.03
7/29/2013 4.24 4411.00 4407.70 19.02
7/30/2013 4.25 4411.00 4407.70 19.02
57 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
7/30/2013 4.25 4411.00 4407.70 19.02
7/31/2013 4.25 4411.00 4407.70 19.02
7/31/2013 4.25 4411.00 4407.70 19.02
8/1/2013 4.25 4411.00 4407.70 19.01
8/1/2013 4.25 4411.00 4407.80 19.01
8/2/2013 4.26 4411.00 4407.80 19.01
8/2/2013 4.26 4411.00 4407.80 19.01
8/3/2013 4.26 4411.00 4407.80 19.01
8/4/2013 4.26 4411.00 4407.80 19.00
8/4/2013 4.26 4411.00 4407.80 19.00
8/5/2013 4.26 4411.00 4407.80 19.00
8/5/2013 4.26 4411.00 4407.80 19.00
8/6/2013 4.27 4411.00 4407.80 19.00
8/6/2013 4.27 4411.00 4407.80 18.99
8/7/2013 4.27 4411.00 4407.80 18.99
8/7/2013 4.27 4411.00 4407.80 18.99
8/8/2013 4.27 4411.00 4407.80 18.99
8/9/2013 4.27 4411.00 4407.90 18.99
8/9/2013 4.28 4411.00 4407.90 18.98
8/10/2013 4.28 4411.00 4407.90 18.98
8/10/2013 4.28 4411.00 4407.90 18.98
8/11/2013 4.28 4411.00 4407.90 18.98
8/11/2013 4.28 4411.00 4407.90 18.98
8/12/2013 4.28 4411.00 4407.90 18.97
8/12/2013 4.28 4411.00 4407.90 18.97
8/13/2013 4.29 4411.00 4407.90 18.97
8/14/2013 4.29 4411.00 4407.90 18.97
8/14/2013 4.29 4411.00 4407.90 18.97
8/15/2013 4.29 4411.00 4407.90 18.96
8/15/2013 4.29 4411.00 4407.90 18.96
8/16/2013 4.29 4411.00 4408.00 18.96
8/16/2013 4.30 4411.00 4408.00 18.96
8/17/2013 4.30 4411.00 4408.00 18.96
8/17/2013 4.30 4411.00 4408.00 18.95
8/18/2013 4.30 4411.00 4408.00 18.95
8/19/2013 4.30 4411.00 4408.00 18.95
8/19/2013 4.30 4411.10 4408.00 18.95
8/20/2013 4.30 4411.10 4408.00 18.95
8/20/2013 4.31 4411.10 4408.00 18.94
8/21/2013 4.31 4411.10 4408.00 18.94
8/21/2013 4.31 4411.10 4408.00 18.94
8/22/2013 4.31 4411.10 4408.00 18.94
8/22/2013 4.31 4411.10 4408.00 18.94
8/23/2013 4.31 4411.10 4408.10 18.93
8/24/2013 4.31 4411.10 4408.10 18.93
8/24/2013 4.32 4411.10 4408.10 18.93
8/25/2013 4.32 4411.10 4408.10 18.93
8/25/2013 4.32 4411.10 4408.10 18.93
8/26/2013 4.32 4411.10 4408.10 18.93
58 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
8/26/2013 4.32 4411.10 4408.10 18.92
8/27/2013 4.32 4411.10 4408.10 18.92
8/27/2013 4.33 4411.10 4408.10 18.92
8/28/2013 4.33 4411.10 4408.10 18.92
8/29/2013 4.33 4411.10 4408.10 18.92
8/29/2013 4.33 4411.10 4408.10 18.91
8/30/2013 4.33 4411.10 4408.10 18.91
8/30/2013 4.33 4411.10 4408.20 18.91
8/31/2013 4.33 4411.10 4408.20 18.91
8/31/2013 4.34 4411.10 4408.20 18.91
9/1/2013 4.34 4411.10 4408.20 18.90
9/1/2013 4.34 4411.10 4408.20 18.90
9/2/2013 4.34 4411.10 4408.20 18.90
9/3/2013 4.34 4411.10 4408.20 18.90
9/3/2013 4.34 4411.10 4408.20 18.90
9/4/2013 4.35 4411.10 4408.20 18.89
9/4/2013 4.35 4411.10 4408.20 18.89
9/5/2013 4.35 4411.10 4408.20 18.89
9/5/2013 4.35 4411.10 4408.20 18.89
9/6/2013 4.35 4411.10 4408.20 18.88
9/6/2013 4.35 4411.10 4408.30 18.88
9/7/2013 4.35 4411.10 4408.30 18.88
9/8/2013 4.36 4411.10 4408.30 18.88
9/8/2013 4.36 4411.10 4408.30 18.88
9/9/2013 4.36 4411.10 4408.30 18.87
9/9/2013 4.36 4411.10 4408.30 18.87
9/10/2013 4.36 4411.10 4408.30 18.87
9/10/2013 4.36 4411.10 4408.30 18.87
9/11/2013 4.37 4411.10 4408.30 18.87
9/11/2013 4.37 4411.10 4408.30 18.86
9/12/2013 4.37 4411.10 4408.30 18.86
9/13/2013 4.37 4411.10 4408.30 18.86
9/13/2013 4.37 4411.10 4408.30 18.86
9/14/2013 4.37 4411.10 4408.40 18.86
9/14/2013 4.37 4411.10 4408.40 18.85
9/15/2013 4.38 4411.10 4408.40 18.85
9/15/2013 4.38 4411.20 4408.40 18.85
9/16/2013 4.38 4411.20 4408.40 18.85
9/16/2013 4.38 4411.20 4408.40 18.84
9/17/2013 4.38 4411.20 4408.40 18.84
9/18/2013 4.38 4411.20 4408.40 18.84
9/18/2013 4.38 4411.20 4408.40 18.84
9/19/2013 4.39 4411.20 4408.40 18.84
9/19/2013 4.39 4411.20 4408.40 18.83
9/20/2013 4.39 4411.20 4408.40 18.83
9/20/2013 4.39 4411.20 4408.50 18.83
9/21/2013 4.39 4411.20 4408.50 18.83
9/21/2013 4.39 4411.20 4408.50 18.83
9/22/2013 4.40 4411.20 4408.50 18.82
59 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
9/23/2013 4.40 4411.20 4408.50 18.82
9/23/2013 4.40 4411.20 4408.50 18.82
9/24/2013 4.40 4411.20 4408.50 18.82
9/24/2013 4.40 4411.20 4408.50 18.82
9/25/2013 4.40 4411.20 4408.50 18.81
9/25/2013 4.40 4411.20 4408.50 18.81
9/26/2013 4.41 4411.20 4408.50 18.81
9/26/2013 4.41 4411.20 4408.50 18.81
9/27/2013 4.41 4411.20 4408.50 18.81
9/28/2013 4.41 4411.20 4408.60 18.80
9/28/2013 4.41 4411.20 4408.60 18.80
9/29/2013 4.41 4411.20 4408.60 18.80
9/29/2013 4.42 4411.20 4408.60 18.80
9/30/2013 4.42 4411.20 4408.60 18.79
9/30/2013 4.42 4411.20 4408.60 18.79
10/1/2013 4.42 4411.20 4408.60 18.79
10/1/2013 4.42 4411.20 4408.60 18.79
10/2/2013 4.42 4411.20 4408.60 18.78
10/3/2013 4.42 4411.20 4408.60 18.78
10/3/2013 4.43 4411.20 4408.60 18.78
10/4/2013 4.43 4411.20 4408.60 18.77
10/4/2013 4.43 4411.20 4408.60 18.77
10/5/2013 4.43 4411.20 4408.70 18.76
10/5/2013 4.43 4411.20 4408.70 18.76
10/6/2013 4.43 4411.20 4408.70 18.76
10/6/2013 4.44 4411.20 4408.70 18.75
10/7/2013 4.44 4411.30 4408.70 18.75
10/8/2013 4.44 4411.30 4408.70 18.75
10/8/2013 4.44 4411.30 4408.70 18.74
10/9/2013 4.44 4411.30 4408.70 18.74
10/9/2013 4.44 4411.30 4408.70 18.74
10/10/2013 4.44 4411.30 4408.70 18.73
10/10/2013 4.45 4411.30 4408.70 18.73
10/11/2013 4.45 4411.30 4408.70 18.72
10/11/2013 4.45 4411.30 4408.70 18.72
10/12/2013 4.45 4411.30 4408.80 18.72
10/13/2013 4.45 4411.30 4408.80 18.71
10/13/2013 4.45 4411.30 4408.80 18.71
10/14/2013 4.45 4411.30 4408.80 18.71
10/14/2013 4.46 4411.30 4408.80 18.70
10/15/2013 4.46 4411.30 4408.80 18.70
10/15/2013 4.46 4411.30 4408.80 18.69
10/16/2013 4.46 4411.30 4408.80 18.69
10/16/2013 4.46 4411.30 4408.80 18.69
10/17/2013 4.46 4411.30 4408.80 18.68
10/18/2013 4.47 4411.30 4408.80 18.68
10/18/2013 4.47 4411.30 4408.80 18.68
10/19/2013 4.47 4411.30 4408.80 18.67
10/19/2013 4.47 4411.30 4408.90 18.67
60 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
10/20/2013 4.47 4411.30 4408.90 18.67
10/20/2013 4.47 4411.30 4408.90 18.66
10/21/2013 4.47 4411.30 4408.90 18.66
10/21/2013 4.48 4411.30 4408.90 18.65
10/22/2013 4.48 4411.40 4408.90 18.65
10/23/2013 4.48 4411.40 4408.90 18.65
10/23/2013 4.48 4411.40 4408.90 18.64
10/24/2013 4.48 4411.40 4408.90 18.64
10/24/2013 4.48 4411.40 4408.90 18.64
10/25/2013 4.49 4411.40 4408.90 18.63
10/25/2013 4.49 4411.40 4408.90 18.63
10/26/2013 4.49 4411.40 4408.90 18.62
10/26/2013 4.49 4411.40 4409.00 18.62
10/27/2013 4.49 4411.40 4409.00 18.62
10/28/2013 4.49 4411.40 4409.00 18.61
10/28/2013 4.49 4411.40 4409.00 18.61
10/29/2013 4.50 4411.40 4409.00 18.61
10/29/2013 4.50 4411.40 4409.00 18.60
10/30/2013 4.50 4411.40 4409.00 18.60
10/30/2013 4.50 4411.40 4409.00 18.60
10/31/2013 4.50 4411.40 4409.00 18.59
10/31/2013 4.50 4411.40 4409.00 18.59
11/1/2013 4.51 4411.40 4409.00 18.58
11/2/2013 4.51 4411.40 4409.00 18.58
11/2/2013 4.51 4411.40 4409.00 18.57
11/3/2013 4.51 4411.40 4409.10 18.57
11/3/2013 4.51 4411.40 4409.10 18.56
11/4/2013 4.51 4411.40 4409.10 18.56
11/4/2013 4.51 4411.50 4409.10 18.55
11/5/2013 4.52 4411.50 4409.10 18.54
11/5/2013 4.52 4411.50 4409.10 18.54
11/6/2013 4.52 4411.50 4409.10 18.53
11/7/2013 4.52 4411.50 4409.10 18.53
11/7/2013 4.52 4411.50 4409.10 18.52
11/8/2013 4.52 4411.50 4409.10 18.51
11/8/2013 4.52 4411.50 4409.10 18.51
11/9/2013 4.53 4411.50 4409.10 18.50
11/9/2013 4.53 4411.50 4409.10 18.50
11/10/2013 4.53 4411.50 4409.20 18.49
11/10/2013 4.53 4411.50 4409.20 18.49
11/11/2013 4.53 4411.50 4409.20 18.48
11/12/2013 4.53 4411.50 4409.20 18.47
11/12/2013 4.54 4411.50 4409.20 18.47
11/13/2013 4.54 4411.50 4409.20 18.46
11/13/2013 4.54 4411.50 4409.20 18.46
11/14/2013 4.54 4411.50 4409.20 18.45
11/14/2013 4.54 4411.60 4409.20 18.45
11/15/2013 4.54 4411.60 4409.20 18.44
11/15/2013 4.54 4411.60 4409.20 18.43
61 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
11/16/2013 4.55 4411.60 4409.20 18.43
11/17/2013 4.55 4411.60 4409.20 18.42
11/17/2013 4.55 4411.60 4409.30 18.42
11/18/2013 4.55 4411.60 4409.30 18.41
11/18/2013 4.55 4411.60 4409.30 18.41
11/19/2013 4.55 4411.60 4409.30 18.40
11/19/2013 4.56 4411.60 4409.30 18.39
11/20/2013 4.56 4411.60 4409.30 18.39
11/20/2013 4.56 4411.60 4409.30 18.38
11/21/2013 4.56 4411.60 4409.30 18.38
11/22/2013 4.56 4411.60 4409.30 18.37
11/22/2013 4.56 4411.60 4409.30 18.37
11/23/2013 4.56 4411.60 4409.30 18.36
11/23/2013 4.57 4411.60 4409.30 18.35
11/24/2013 4.57 4411.70 4409.30 18.35
11/24/2013 4.57 4411.70 4409.40 18.34
11/25/2013 4.57 4411.70 4409.40 18.34
11/25/2013 4.57 4411.70 4409.40 18.33
11/26/2013 4.57 4411.70 4409.40 18.32
11/27/2013 4.58 4411.70 4409.40 18.32
11/27/2013 4.58 4411.70 4409.40 18.31
11/28/2013 4.58 4411.70 4409.40 18.31
11/28/2013 4.58 4411.70 4409.40 18.30
11/29/2013 4.58 4411.70 4409.40 18.30
11/29/2013 4.58 4411.70 4409.40 18.29
11/30/2013 4.58 4411.70 4409.40 18.28
11/30/2013 4.59 4411.70 4409.40 18.28
12/1/2013 4.59 4411.70 4409.40 18.27
12/2/2013 4.59 4411.70 4409.50 18.27
12/2/2013 4.59 4411.70 4409.50 18.26
12/3/2013 4.59 4411.80 4409.50 18.25
12/3/2013 4.59 4411.80 4409.50 18.24
12/4/2013 4.59 4411.80 4409.50 18.23
12/4/2013 4.60 4411.80 4409.50 18.23
12/5/2013 4.60 4411.80 4409.50 18.22
12/5/2013 4.60 4411.80 4409.50 18.21
12/6/2013 4.60 4411.80 4409.50 18.20
12/7/2013 4.60 4411.80 4409.50 18.19
12/7/2013 4.60 4411.80 4409.50 18.19
12/8/2013 4.61 4411.80 4409.50 18.18
12/8/2013 4.61 4411.80 4409.50 18.17
12/9/2013 4.61 4411.80 4409.60 18.16
12/9/2013 4.61 4411.80 4409.60 18.15
12/10/2013 4.61 4411.90 4409.60 18.15
12/10/2013 4.61 4411.90 4409.60 18.14
12/11/2013 4.61 4411.90 4409.60 18.13
12/12/2013 4.62 4411.90 4409.60 18.12
12/12/2013 4.62 4411.90 4409.60 18.12
12/13/2013 4.62 4411.90 4409.60 18.11
62 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
12/13/2013 4.62 4411.90 4409.60 18.10
12/14/2013 4.62 4411.90 4409.60 18.09
12/14/2013 4.62 4411.90 4409.60 18.08
12/15/2013 4.63 4411.90 4409.60 18.08
12/15/2013 4.63 4411.90 4409.60 18.07
12/16/2013 4.63 4411.90 4409.70 18.06
12/17/2013 4.63 4411.90 4409.70 18.05
12/17/2013 4.63 4412.00 4409.70 18.04
12/18/2013 4.63 4412.00 4409.70 18.04
12/18/2013 4.63 4412.00 4409.70 18.03
12/19/2013 4.64 4412.00 4409.70 18.02
12/19/2013 4.64 4412.00 4409.70 18.01
12/20/2013 4.64 4412.00 4409.70 18.00
12/20/2013 4.64 4412.00 4409.70 18.00
12/21/2013 4.64 4412.00 4409.70 17.99
12/22/2013 4.64 4412.00 4409.70 17.98
12/22/2013 4.64 4412.00 4409.70 17.97
12/23/2013 4.65 4412.00 4409.70 17.97
12/23/2013 4.65 4412.00 4409.80 17.96
12/24/2013 4.65 4412.10 4409.80 17.95
12/24/2013 4.65 4412.10 4409.80 17.94
12/25/2013 4.65 4412.10 4409.80 17.93
12/25/2013 4.65 4412.10 4409.80 17.93
12/26/2013 4.66 4412.10 4409.80 17.92
12/27/2013 4.66 4412.10 4409.80 17.91
12/27/2013 4.66 4412.10 4409.80 17.90
12/28/2013 4.66 4412.10 4409.80 17.89
12/28/2013 4.66 4412.10 4409.80 17.89
12/29/2013 4.66 4412.10 4409.80 17.88
12/29/2013 4.66 4412.10 4409.80 17.87
12/30/2013 4.67 4412.10 4409.80 17.86
12/30/2013 4.67 4412.10 4409.90 17.86
12/31/2013 4.67 4412.20 4409.90 17.85
1/1/2014 4.67 4412.20 4409.90 17.84
1/1/2014 4.67 4412.20 4409.90 17.83
1/2/2014 4.67 4412.20 4409.90 17.82
1/2/2014 4.68 4412.20 4409.90 17.81
1/3/2014 4.68 4412.20 4409.90 17.80
1/3/2014 4.68 4412.20 4409.90 17.79
1/4/2014 4.68 4412.20 4409.90 17.79
1/4/2014 4.68 4412.20 4409.90 17.78
1/5/2014 4.68 4412.20 4409.90 17.77
1/6/2014 4.68 4412.20 4409.90 17.76
1/6/2014 4.69 4412.30 4409.90 17.75
1/7/2014 4.69 4412.30 4410.00 17.74
1/7/2014 4.69 4412.30 4410.00 17.73
1/8/2014 4.69 4412.30 4410.00 17.72
1/8/2014 4.69 4412.30 4410.00 17.71
1/9/2014 4.69 4412.30 4410.00 17.70
63 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
1/9/2014 4.70 4412.30 4410.00 17.70
1/10/2014 4.70 4412.30 4410.00 17.69
1/11/2014 4.70 4412.30 4410.00 17.68
1/11/2014 4.70 4412.30 4410.00 17.67
1/12/2014 4.70 4412.30 4410.00 17.66
1/12/2014 4.70 4412.30 4410.00 17.65
1/13/2014 4.70 4412.40 4410.00 17.64
1/13/2014 4.71 4412.40 4410.00 17.63
1/14/2014 4.71 4412.40 4410.00 17.62
1/14/2014 4.71 4412.40 4410.10 17.61
1/15/2014 4.71 4412.40 4410.10 17.61
1/16/2014 4.71 4412.40 4410.10 17.60
1/16/2014 4.71 4412.40 4410.10 17.59
1/17/2014 4.71 4412.40 4410.10 17.58
1/17/2014 4.72 4412.40 4410.10 17.57
1/18/2014 4.72 4412.40 4410.10 17.56
1/18/2014 4.72 4412.40 4410.10 17.55
1/19/2014 4.72 4412.50 4410.10 17.54
1/19/2014 4.72 4412.50 4410.10 17.53
1/20/2014 4.72 4412.50 4410.10 17.53
1/21/2014 4.73 4412.50 4410.10 17.52
1/21/2014 4.73 4412.50 4410.10 17.51
1/22/2014 4.73 4412.50 4410.10 17.50
1/22/2014 4.73 4412.50 4410.10 17.49
1/23/2014 4.73 4412.50 4410.20 17.48
1/23/2014 4.73 4412.50 4410.20 17.47
1/24/2014 4.73 4412.50 4410.20 17.46
1/24/2014 4.74 4412.50 4410.20 17.45
1/25/2014 4.74 4412.60 4410.20 17.44
1/26/2014 4.74 4412.60 4410.20 17.44
1/26/2014 4.74 4412.60 4410.20 17.43
1/27/2014 4.74 4412.60 4410.20 17.42
1/27/2014 4.74 4412.60 4410.20 17.41
1/28/2014 4.75 4412.60 4410.20 17.40
1/28/2014 4.75 4412.60 4410.20 17.39
1/29/2014 4.75 4412.60 4410.20 17.38
1/29/2014 4.75 4412.60 4410.20 17.37
1/30/2014 4.75 4412.60 4410.20 17.36
1/31/2014 4.75 4412.60 4410.30 17.35
1/31/2014 4.75 4412.70 4410.30 17.35
2/1/2014 4.76 4412.70 4410.30 17.34
2/1/2014 4.76 4412.70 4410.30 17.33
2/2/2014 4.76 4412.70 4410.30 17.32
2/2/2014 4.76 4412.70 4410.30 17.31
2/3/2014 4.76 4412.70 4410.30 17.30
2/3/2014 4.76 4412.70 4410.30 17.29
2/4/2014 4.77 4412.70 4410.30 17.28
2/5/2014 4.77 4412.70 4410.30 17.27
2/5/2014 4.77 4412.70 4410.30 17.26
64 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
2/6/2014 4.77 4412.70 4410.30 17.25
2/6/2014 4.77 4412.80 4410.30 17.25
2/7/2014 4.77 4412.80 4410.30 17.24
2/7/2014 4.77 4412.80 4410.30 17.23
2/8/2014 4.78 4412.80 4410.40 17.22
2/8/2014 4.78 4412.80 4410.40 17.21
2/9/2014 4.78 4412.80 4410.40 17.20
2/10/2014 4.78 4412.80 4410.40 17.19
2/10/2014 4.78 4412.80 4410.40 17.18
2/11/2014 4.78 4412.80 4410.40 17.17
2/11/2014 4.78 4412.80 4410.40 17.16
2/12/2014 4.79 4412.80 4410.40 17.15
2/12/2014 4.79 4412.90 4410.40 17.15
2/13/2014 4.79 4412.90 4410.40 17.14
2/13/2014 4.79 4412.90 4410.40 17.13
2/14/2014 4.79 4412.90 4410.40 17.12
2/15/2014 4.79 4412.90 4410.40 17.11
2/15/2014 4.80 4412.90 4410.40 17.10
2/16/2014 4.80 4412.90 4410.40 17.09
2/16/2014 4.80 4412.90 4410.50 17.08
2/17/2014 4.80 4412.90 4410.50 17.07
2/17/2014 4.80 4412.90 4410.50 17.06
2/18/2014 4.80 4412.90 4410.50 17.05
2/18/2014 4.80 4413.00 4410.50 17.04
2/19/2014 4.81 4413.00 4410.50 17.04
2/20/2014 4.81 4413.00 4410.50 17.03
2/20/2014 4.81 4413.00 4410.50 17.02
2/21/2014 4.81 4413.00 4410.50 17.01
2/21/2014 4.81 4413.00 4410.50 17.00
2/22/2014 4.81 4413.00 4410.50 16.99
2/22/2014 4.82 4413.00 4410.50 16.98
2/23/2014 4.82 4413.00 4410.50 16.97
2/23/2014 4.82 4413.00 4410.50 16.96
2/24/2014 4.82 4413.00 4410.50 16.95
2/25/2014 4.82 4413.10 4410.60 16.94
2/25/2014 4.82 4413.10 4410.60 16.94
2/26/2014 4.82 4413.10 4410.60 16.93
2/26/2014 4.83 4413.10 4410.60 16.92
2/27/2014 4.83 4413.10 4410.60 16.91
2/27/2014 4.83 4413.10 4410.60 16.90
2/28/2014 4.83 4413.10 4410.60 16.89
2/28/2014 4.83 4413.10 4410.60 16.88
3/1/2014 4.83 4413.10 4410.60 16.87
3/2/2014 4.84 4413.10 4410.60 16.86
3/2/2014 4.84 4413.10 4410.60 16.85
3/3/2014 4.84 4413.20 4410.60 16.84
3/3/2014 4.84 4413.20 4410.60 16.83
3/4/2014 4.84 4413.20 4410.60 16.82
3/4/2014 4.84 4413.20 4410.70 16.81
65 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
3/5/2014 4.84 4413.20 4410.70 16.80
3/5/2014 4.85 4413.20 4410.70 16.79
3/6/2014 4.85 4413.20 4410.70 16.78
3/7/2014 4.85 4413.20 4410.70 16.77
3/7/2014 4.85 4413.20 4410.70 16.76
3/8/2014 4.85 4413.20 4410.70 16.76
3/8/2014 4.85 4413.30 4410.70 16.75
3/9/2014 4.85 4413.30 4410.70 16.74
3/9/2014 4.86 4413.30 4410.70 16.73
3/10/2014 4.86 4413.30 4410.70 16.72
3/10/2014 4.86 4413.30 4410.70 16.71
3/11/2014 4.86 4413.30 4410.70 16.70
3/12/2014 4.86 4413.30 4410.70 16.69
3/12/2014 4.86 4413.30 4410.70 16.68
3/13/2014 4.87 4413.30 4410.80 16.67
3/13/2014 4.87 4413.30 4410.80 16.66
3/14/2014 4.87 4413.40 4410.80 16.65
3/14/2014 4.87 4413.40 4410.80 16.64
3/15/2014 4.87 4413.40 4410.80 16.63
3/15/2014 4.87 4413.40 4410.80 16.62
3/16/2014 4.87 4413.40 4410.80 16.61
3/17/2014 4.88 4413.40 4410.80 16.60
3/17/2014 4.88 4413.40 4410.80 16.59
3/18/2014 4.88 4413.40 4410.80 16.58
3/18/2014 4.88 4413.40 4410.80 16.57
3/19/2014 4.88 4413.40 4410.80 16.56
3/19/2014 4.88 4413.40 4410.80 16.55
3/20/2014 4.89 4413.50 4410.80 16.54
3/20/2014 4.89 4413.50 4410.80 16.53
3/21/2014 4.89 4413.50 4410.90 16.52
3/22/2014 4.89 4413.50 4410.90 16.51
3/22/2014 4.89 4413.50 4410.90 16.50
3/23/2014 4.89 4413.50 4410.90 16.49
3/23/2014 4.89 4413.50 4410.90 16.48
3/24/2014 4.90 4413.50 4410.90 16.47
3/24/2014 4.90 4413.50 4410.90 16.46
3/25/2014 4.90 4413.50 4410.90 16.45
3/25/2014 4.90 4413.60 4410.90 16.45
3/26/2014 4.90 4413.60 4410.90 16.44
3/27/2014 4.90 4413.60 4410.90 16.43
3/27/2014 4.91 4413.60 4410.90 16.42
3/28/2014 4.91 4413.60 4410.90 16.41
3/28/2014 4.91 4413.60 4410.90 16.40
3/29/2014 4.91 4413.60 4410.90 16.39
3/29/2014 4.91 4413.60 4411.00 16.38
3/30/2014 4.91 4413.60 4411.00 16.37
3/30/2014 4.91 4413.60 4411.00 16.36
3/31/2014 4.92 4413.70 4411.00 16.35
4/1/2014 4.92 4413.70 4411.00 16.34
66 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
4/1/2014 4.92 4413.70 4411.00 16.33
4/2/2014 4.92 4413.70 4411.00 16.32
4/2/2014 4.92 4413.70 4411.00 16.32
4/3/2014 4.92 4413.70 4411.00 16.31
4/3/2014 4.92 4413.70 4411.00 16.30
4/4/2014 4.93 4413.70 4411.00 16.29
4/4/2014 4.93 4413.70 4411.00 16.28
4/5/2014 4.93 4413.70 4411.00 16.28
4/6/2014 4.93 4413.70 4411.00 16.27
4/6/2014 4.93 4413.70 4411.10 16.26
4/7/2014 4.93 4413.70 4411.10 16.25
4/7/2014 4.94 4413.80 4411.10 16.24
4/8/2014 4.94 4413.80 4411.10 16.24
4/8/2014 4.94 4413.80 4411.10 16.23
4/9/2014 4.94 4413.80 4411.10 16.22
4/9/2014 4.94 4413.80 4411.10 16.21
4/10/2014 4.94 4413.80 4411.10 16.21
4/11/2014 4.94 4413.80 4411.10 16.20
4/11/2014 4.95 4413.80 4411.10 16.19
4/12/2014 4.95 4413.80 4411.10 16.18
4/12/2014 4.95 4413.80 4411.10 16.17
4/13/2014 4.95 4413.80 4411.10 16.17
4/13/2014 4.95 4413.80 4411.10 16.16
4/14/2014 4.95 4413.90 4411.10 16.15
4/14/2014 4.96 4413.90 4411.20 16.14
4/15/2014 4.96 4413.90 4411.20 16.13
4/16/2014 4.96 4413.90 4411.20 16.13
4/16/2014 4.96 4413.90 4411.20 16.12
4/17/2014 4.96 4413.90 4411.20 16.11
4/17/2014 4.96 4413.90 4411.20 16.10
4/18/2014 4.96 4413.90 4411.20 16.09
4/18/2014 4.97 4413.90 4411.20 16.09
4/19/2014 4.97 4413.90 4411.20 16.08
4/19/2014 4.97 4413.90 4411.20 16.07
4/20/2014 4.97 4413.90 4411.20 16.06
4/21/2014 4.97 4413.90 4411.20 16.06
4/21/2014 4.97 4414.00 4411.20 16.05
4/22/2014 4.98 4414.00 4411.20 16.04
4/22/2014 4.98 4414.00 4411.20 16.03
4/23/2014 4.98 4414.00 4411.30 16.02
4/23/2014 4.98 4414.00 4411.30 16.02
4/24/2014 4.98 4414.00 4411.30 16.01
4/24/2014 4.98 4414.00 4411.30 16.00
4/25/2014 4.98 4414.00 4411.30 15.99
4/26/2014 4.99 4414.00 4411.30 15.98
4/26/2014 4.99 4414.00 4411.30 15.98
4/27/2014 4.99 4414.00 4411.30 15.97
4/27/2014 4.99 4414.00 4411.30 15.96
4/28/2014 4.99 4414.00 4411.30 15.95
67 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
4/28/2014 4.99 4414.10 4411.30 15.95
4/29/2014 4.99 4414.10 4411.30 15.94
4/29/2014 5.00 4414.10 4411.30 15.93
4/30/2014 5.00 4414.10 4411.30 15.92
5/1/2014 5.00 4414.10 4411.30 15.91
5/1/2014 5.00 4414.10 4411.40 15.91
5/2/2014 5.00 4414.10 4411.40 15.90
5/2/2014 5.00 4414.10 4411.40 15.89
5/3/2014 5.01 4414.10 4411.40 15.89
5/3/2014 5.01 4414.10 4411.40 15.88
5/4/2014 5.01 4414.10 4411.40 15.87
5/4/2014 5.01 4414.10 4411.40 15.86
5/5/2014 5.01 4414.10 4411.40 15.86
5/5/2014 5.01 4414.20 4411.40 15.85
5/6/2014 5.01 4414.20 4411.40 15.84
5/7/2014 5.02 4414.20 4411.40 15.83
5/7/2014 5.02 4414.20 4411.40 15.83
5/8/2014 5.02 4414.20 4411.40 15.82
5/8/2014 5.02 4414.20 4411.40 15.81
5/9/2014 5.02 4414.20 4411.50 15.81
5/9/2014 5.02 4414.20 4411.50 15.80
5/10/2014 5.03 4414.20 4411.50 15.79
5/10/2014 5.03 4414.20 4411.50 15.78
5/11/2014 5.03 4414.20 4411.50 15.78
5/12/2014 5.03 4414.20 4411.50 15.77
5/12/2014 5.03 4414.20 4411.50 15.76
5/13/2014 5.03 4414.20 4411.50 15.75
5/13/2014 5.03 4414.30 4411.50 15.75
5/14/2014 5.04 4414.30 4411.50 15.74
5/14/2014 5.04 4414.30 4411.50 15.73
5/15/2014 5.04 4414.30 4411.50 15.73
5/15/2014 5.04 4414.30 4411.50 15.72
5/16/2014 5.04 4414.30 4411.50 15.71
5/17/2014 5.04 4414.30 4411.50 15.70
5/17/2014 5.04 4414.30 4411.60 15.70
5/18/2014 5.05 4414.30 4411.60 15.69
5/18/2014 5.05 4414.30 4411.60 15.68
5/19/2014 5.05 4414.30 4411.60 15.67
5/19/2014 5.05 4414.30 4411.60 15.67
5/20/2014 5.05 4414.30 4411.60 15.66
5/20/2014 5.05 4414.30 4411.60 15.65
5/21/2014 5.06 4414.40 4411.60 15.65
5/22/2014 5.06 4414.40 4411.60 15.64
5/22/2014 5.06 4414.40 4411.60 15.63
5/23/2014 5.06 4414.40 4411.60 15.62
5/23/2014 5.06 4414.40 4411.60 15.62
5/24/2014 5.06 4414.40 4411.60 15.61
5/24/2014 5.06 4414.40 4411.60 15.60
5/25/2014 5.07 4414.40 4411.60 15.59
68 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
5/25/2014 5.07 4414.40 4411.70 15.59
5/26/2014 5.07 4414.40 4411.70 15.58
5/27/2014 5.07 4414.40 4411.70 15.57
5/27/2014 5.07 4414.40 4411.70 15.57
5/28/2014 5.07 4414.40 4411.70 15.56
5/28/2014 5.08 4414.40 4411.70 15.55
5/29/2014 5.08 4414.50 4411.70 15.54
5/29/2014 5.08 4414.50 4411.70 15.54
5/30/2014 5.08 4414.50 4411.70 15.53
5/30/2014 5.08 4414.50 4411.70 15.52
5/31/2014 5.08 4414.50 4411.70 15.51
6/1/2014 5.08 4414.50 4411.70 15.51
6/1/2014 5.09 4414.50 4411.70 15.50
6/2/2014 5.09 4414.50 4411.70 15.50
6/2/2014 5.09 4414.50 4411.70 15.49
6/3/2014 5.09 4414.50 4411.80 15.49
6/3/2014 5.09 4414.50 4411.80 15.48
6/4/2014 5.09 4414.50 4411.80 15.48
6/4/2014 5.10 4414.50 4411.80 15.47
6/5/2014 5.10 4414.50 4411.80 15.46
6/6/2014 5.10 4414.50 4411.80 15.46
6/6/2014 5.10 4414.50 4411.80 15.45
6/7/2014 5.10 4414.60 4411.80 15.45
6/7/2014 5.10 4414.60 4411.80 15.44
6/8/2014 5.10 4414.60 4411.80 15.44
6/8/2014 5.11 4414.60 4411.80 15.43
6/9/2014 5.11 4414.60 4411.80 15.43
6/9/2014 5.11 4414.60 4411.80 15.42
6/10/2014 5.11 4414.60 4411.80 15.42
6/11/2014 5.11 4414.60 4411.90 15.41
6/11/2014 5.11 4414.60 4411.90 15.41
6/12/2014 5.11 4414.60 4411.90 15.40
6/12/2014 5.12 4414.60 4411.90 15.40
6/13/2014 5.12 4414.60 4411.90 15.39
6/13/2014 5.12 4414.60 4411.90 15.39
6/14/2014 5.12 4414.60 4411.90 15.38
6/14/2014 5.12 4414.60 4411.90 15.38
6/15/2014 5.12 4414.60 4411.90 15.37
6/16/2014 5.13 4414.60 4411.90 15.36
6/16/2014 5.13 4414.60 4411.90 15.36
6/17/2014 5.13 4414.60 4411.90 15.35
6/17/2014 5.13 4414.70 4411.90 15.35
6/18/2014 5.13 4414.70 4411.90 15.34
6/18/2014 5.13 4414.70 4411.90 15.34
6/19/2014 5.13 4414.70 4412.00 15.33
6/19/2014 5.14 4414.70 4412.00 15.33
6/20/2014 5.14 4414.70 4412.00 15.32
6/21/2014 5.14 4414.70 4412.00 15.32
6/21/2014 5.14 4414.70 4412.00 15.31
69 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
6/22/2014 5.14 4414.70 4412.00 15.31
6/22/2014 5.14 4414.70 4412.00 15.30
6/23/2014 5.15 4414.70 4412.00 15.30
6/23/2014 5.15 4414.70 4412.00 15.29
6/24/2014 5.15 4414.70 4412.00 15.29
6/24/2014 5.15 4414.70 4412.00 15.28
6/25/2014 5.15 4414.70 4412.00 15.27
6/26/2014 5.15 4414.70 4412.00 15.27
6/26/2014 5.15 4414.70 4412.00 15.26
6/27/2014 5.16 4414.70 4412.00 15.26
6/27/2014 5.16 4414.70 4412.10 15.25
6/28/2014 5.16 4414.80 4412.10 15.25
6/28/2014 5.16 4414.80 4412.10 15.24
6/29/2014 5.16 4414.80 4412.10 15.24
6/29/2014 5.16 4414.80 4412.10 15.23
6/30/2014 5.17 4414.80 4412.10 15.23
7/1/2014 5.17 4414.80 4412.10 15.22
7/1/2014 5.17 4414.80 4412.10 15.22
7/2/2014 5.17 4414.80 4412.10 15.22
7/2/2014 5.17 4414.80 4412.10 15.22
7/3/2014 5.17 4414.80 4412.10 15.22
7/3/2014 5.17 4414.80 4412.10 15.22
7/4/2014 5.18 4414.80 4412.10 15.21
7/4/2014 5.18 4414.80 4412.10 15.21
7/5/2014 5.18 4414.80 4412.10 15.21
7/6/2014 5.18 4414.80 4412.20 15.21
7/6/2014 5.18 4414.80 4412.20 15.21
7/7/2014 5.18 4414.80 4412.20 15.21
7/7/2014 5.18 4414.80 4412.20 15.21
7/8/2014 5.19 4414.80 4412.20 15.20
7/8/2014 5.19 4414.80 4412.20 15.20
7/9/2014 5.19 4414.80 4412.20 15.20
7/9/2014 5.19 4414.80 4412.20 15.20
7/10/2014 5.19 4414.80 4412.20 15.20
7/11/2014 5.19 4414.80 4412.20 15.20
7/11/2014 5.20 4414.80 4412.20 15.20
7/12/2014 5.20 4414.80 4412.20 15.20
7/12/2014 5.20 4414.80 4412.20 15.19
7/13/2014 5.20 4414.80 4412.20 15.19
7/13/2014 5.20 4414.80 4412.30 15.19
7/14/2014 5.20 4414.80 4412.30 15.19
7/14/2014 5.20 4414.80 4412.30 15.19
7/15/2014 5.21 4414.80 4412.30 15.19
7/16/2014 5.21 4414.80 4412.30 15.19
7/16/2014 5.21 4414.80 4412.30 15.18
7/17/2014 5.21 4414.80 4412.30 15.18
7/17/2014 5.21 4414.80 4412.30 15.18
7/18/2014 5.21 4414.80 4412.30 15.18
7/18/2014 5.22 4414.80 4412.30 15.18
70 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
7/19/2014 5.22 4414.80 4412.30 15.18
7/19/2014 5.22 4414.80 4412.30 15.18
7/20/2014 5.22 4414.80 4412.30 15.17
7/21/2014 5.22 4414.80 4412.30 15.17
7/21/2014 5.22 4414.80 4412.30 15.17
7/22/2014 5.22 4414.80 4412.40 15.17
7/22/2014 5.23 4414.80 4412.40 15.17
7/23/2014 5.23 4414.80 4412.40 15.17
7/23/2014 5.23 4414.80 4412.40 15.17
7/24/2014 5.23 4414.80 4412.40 15.17
7/24/2014 5.23 4414.80 4412.40 15.16
7/25/2014 5.23 4414.80 4412.40 15.16
7/26/2014 5.24 4414.80 4412.40 15.16
7/26/2014 5.24 4414.80 4412.40 15.16
7/27/2014 5.24 4414.80 4412.40 15.16
7/27/2014 5.24 4414.80 4412.40 15.16
7/28/2014 5.24 4414.80 4412.40 15.16
7/28/2014 5.24 4414.80 4412.40 15.15
7/29/2014 5.24 4414.80 4412.40 15.15
7/29/2014 5.25 4414.80 4412.40 15.15
7/30/2014 5.25 4414.90 4412.50 15.15
7/31/2014 5.25 4414.90 4412.50 15.15
7/31/2014 5.25 4414.90 4412.50 15.15
8/1/2014 5.25 4414.90 4412.50 15.15
8/1/2014 5.25 4414.90 4412.50 15.15
8/2/2014 5.25 4414.90 4412.50 15.14
8/2/2014 5.26 4414.90 4412.50 15.14
8/3/2014 5.26 4414.90 4412.50 15.14
8/3/2014 5.26 4414.90 4412.50 15.14
8/4/2014 5.26 4414.90 4412.50 15.14
8/5/2014 5.26 4414.90 4412.50 15.14
8/5/2014 5.26 4414.90 4412.50 15.14
8/6/2014 5.27 4414.90 4412.50 15.13
8/6/2014 5.27 4414.90 4412.50 15.13
8/7/2014 5.27 4414.90 4412.50 15.13
8/7/2014 5.27 4414.90 4412.60 15.13
8/8/2014 5.27 4414.90 4412.60 15.13
8/8/2014 5.27 4414.90 4412.60 15.13
8/9/2014 5.27 4414.90 4412.60 15.13
8/10/2014 5.28 4414.90 4412.60 15.12
8/10/2014 5.28 4414.90 4412.60 15.12
8/11/2014 5.28 4414.90 4412.60 15.12
8/11/2014 5.28 4414.90 4412.60 15.12
8/12/2014 5.28 4414.90 4412.60 15.12
8/12/2014 5.28 4414.90 4412.60 15.12
8/13/2014 5.29 4414.90 4412.60 15.12
8/13/2014 5.29 4414.90 4412.60 15.12
8/14/2014 5.29 4414.90 4412.60 15.11
8/15/2014 5.29 4414.90 4412.60 15.11
71 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
8/15/2014 5.29 4414.90 4412.60 15.11
8/16/2014 5.29 4414.90 4412.70 15.11
8/16/2014 5.29 4414.90 4412.70 15.11
8/17/2014 5.30 4414.90 4412.70 15.11
8/17/2014 5.30 4414.90 4412.70 15.11
8/18/2014 5.30 4414.90 4412.70 15.10
8/18/2014 5.30 4414.90 4412.70 15.10
8/19/2014 5.30 4414.90 4412.70 15.10
8/20/2014 5.30 4414.90 4412.70 15.10
8/20/2014 5.31 4414.90 4412.70 15.10
8/21/2014 5.31 4414.90 4412.70 15.10
8/21/2014 5.31 4414.90 4412.70 15.10
8/22/2014 5.31 4414.90 4412.70 15.09
8/22/2014 5.31 4414.90 4412.70 15.09
8/23/2014 5.31 4414.90 4412.70 15.09
8/23/2014 5.31 4414.90 4412.80 15.09
8/24/2014 5.32 4414.90 4412.80 15.09
8/25/2014 5.32 4414.90 4412.80 15.09
8/25/2014 5.32 4414.90 4412.80 15.09
8/26/2014 5.32 4414.90 4412.80 15.09
8/26/2014 5.32 4414.90 4412.80 15.08
8/27/2014 5.32 4414.90 4412.80 15.08
8/27/2014 5.32 4414.90 4412.80 15.08
8/28/2014 5.33 4414.90 4412.80 15.08
8/28/2014 5.33 4414.90 4412.80 15.08
8/29/2014 5.33 4414.90 4412.80 15.08
8/30/2014 5.33 4414.90 4412.80 15.08
8/30/2014 5.33 4414.90 4412.80 15.07
8/31/2014 5.33 4414.90 4412.80 15.07
8/31/2014 5.34 4414.90 4412.80 15.07
9/1/2014 5.34 4414.90 4412.90 15.07
9/1/2014 5.34 4414.90 4412.90 15.07
9/2/2014 5.34 4414.90 4412.90 15.07
9/2/2014 5.34 4414.90 4412.90 15.07
9/3/2014 5.34 4414.90 4412.90 15.06
9/4/2014 5.34 4414.90 4412.90 15.06
9/4/2014 5.35 4414.90 4412.90 15.06
9/5/2014 5.35 4414.90 4412.90 15.06
9/5/2014 5.35 4414.90 4412.90 15.06
9/6/2014 5.35 4414.90 4412.90 15.06
9/6/2014 5.35 4414.90 4412.90 15.06
9/7/2014 5.35 4414.90 4412.90 15.05
9/7/2014 5.36 4414.90 4412.90 15.05
9/8/2014 5.36 4415.00 4412.90 15.05
9/9/2014 5.36 4415.00 4412.90 15.05
9/9/2014 5.36 4415.00 4413.00 15.05
9/10/2014 5.36 4415.00 4413.00 15.05
9/10/2014 5.36 4415.00 4413.00 15.04
9/11/2014 5.36 4415.00 4413.00 15.04
72 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
9/11/2014 5.37 4415.00 4413.00 15.04
9/12/2014 5.37 4415.00 4413.00 15.04
9/12/2014 5.37 4415.00 4413.00 15.04
9/13/2014 5.37 4415.00 4413.00 15.04
9/14/2014 5.37 4415.00 4413.00 15.04
9/14/2014 5.37 4415.00 4413.00 15.03
9/15/2014 5.38 4415.00 4413.00 15.03
9/15/2014 5.38 4415.00 4413.00 15.03
9/16/2014 5.38 4415.00 4413.00 15.03
9/16/2014 5.38 4415.00 4413.00 15.03
9/17/2014 5.38 4415.00 4413.00 15.03
9/17/2014 5.38 4415.00 4413.10 15.03
9/18/2014 5.38 4415.00 4413.10 15.02
9/19/2014 5.39 4415.00 4413.10 15.02
9/19/2014 5.39 4415.00 4413.10 15.02
9/20/2014 5.39 4415.00 4413.10 15.02
9/20/2014 5.39 4415.00 4413.10 15.02
9/21/2014 5.39 4415.00 4413.10 15.02
9/21/2014 5.39 4415.00 4413.10 15.02
9/22/2014 5.39 4415.00 4413.10 15.01
9/22/2014 5.40 4415.00 4413.10 15.01
9/23/2014 5.40 4415.00 4413.10 15.01
9/24/2014 5.40 4415.00 4413.10 15.01
9/24/2014 5.40 4415.00 4413.10 15.01
9/25/2014 5.40 4415.00 4413.10 15.01
9/25/2014 5.40 4415.00 4413.20 15.00
9/26/2014 5.41 4415.00 4413.20 15.00
9/26/2014 5.41 4415.00 4413.20 15.00
9/27/2014 5.41 4415.00 4413.20 15.00
9/27/2014 5.41 4415.00 4413.20 15.00
9/28/2014 5.41 4415.00 4413.20 15.00
9/29/2014 5.41 4415.00 4413.20 15.00
9/29/2014 5.41 4415.00 4413.20 14.99
9/30/2014 5.42 4415.00 4413.20 14.99
9/30/2014 5.42 4415.00 4413.20 14.99
10/1/2014 5.42 4415.00 4413.20 14.99
10/1/2014 5.42 4415.00 4413.20 14.99
10/2/2014 5.42 4415.00 4413.20 14.98
10/2/2014 5.42 4415.00 4413.20 14.98
10/3/2014 5.43 4415.00 4413.20 14.98
10/4/2014 5.43 4415.00 4413.30 14.97
10/4/2014 5.43 4415.00 4413.30 14.97
10/5/2014 5.43 4415.00 4413.30 14.97
10/5/2014 5.43 4415.00 4413.30 14.96
10/6/2014 5.43 4415.00 4413.30 14.96
10/6/2014 5.43 4415.00 4413.30 14.96
10/7/2014 5.44 4415.00 4413.30 14.95
10/7/2014 5.44 4415.00 4413.30 14.95
10/8/2014 5.44 4415.10 4413.30 14.95
73 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
10/9/2014 5.44 4415.10 4413.30 14.95
10/9/2014 5.44 4415.10 4413.30 14.94
10/10/2014 5.44 4415.10 4413.30 14.94
10/10/2014 5.45 4415.10 4413.30 14.94
10/11/2014 5.45 4415.10 4413.30 14.93
10/11/2014 5.45 4415.10 4413.30 14.93
10/12/2014 5.45 4415.10 4413.40 14.93
10/12/2014 5.45 4415.10 4413.40 14.92
10/13/2014 5.45 4415.10 4413.40 14.92
10/14/2014 5.45 4415.10 4413.40 14.92
10/14/2014 5.46 4415.10 4413.40 14.91
10/15/2014 5.46 4415.10 4413.40 14.91
10/15/2014 5.46 4415.10 4413.40 14.91
10/16/2014 5.46 4415.10 4413.40 14.90
10/16/2014 5.46 4415.10 4413.40 14.90
10/17/2014 5.46 4415.10 4413.40 14.90
10/17/2014 5.46 4415.10 4413.40 14.89
10/18/2014 5.47 4415.10 4413.40 14.89
10/19/2014 5.47 4415.10 4413.40 14.89
10/19/2014 5.47 4415.10 4413.40 14.88
10/20/2014 5.47 4415.10 4413.40 14.88
10/20/2014 5.47 4415.10 4413.50 14.88
10/21/2014 5.47 4415.10 4413.50 14.88
10/21/2014 5.48 4415.10 4413.50 14.87
10/22/2014 5.48 4415.10 4413.50 14.87
10/22/2014 5.48 4415.10 4413.50 14.87
10/23/2014 5.48 4415.10 4413.50 14.86
10/24/2014 5.48 4415.10 4413.50 14.86
10/24/2014 5.48 4415.10 4413.50 14.86
10/25/2014 5.48 4415.10 4413.50 14.85
10/25/2014 5.49 4415.20 4413.50 14.85
10/26/2014 5.49 4415.20 4413.50 14.85
10/26/2014 5.49 4415.20 4413.50 14.84
10/27/2014 5.49 4415.20 4413.50 14.84
10/27/2014 5.49 4415.20 4413.50 14.84
10/28/2014 5.49 4415.20 4413.60 14.83
10/29/2014 5.50 4415.20 4413.60 14.83
10/29/2014 5.50 4415.20 4413.60 14.83
10/30/2014 5.50 4415.20 4413.60 14.82
10/30/2014 5.50 4415.20 4413.60 14.82
10/31/2014 5.50 4415.20 4413.60 14.82
10/31/2014 5.50 4415.20 4413.60 14.81
11/1/2014 5.50 4415.20 4413.60 14.81
11/1/2014 5.51 4415.20 4413.60 14.81
11/2/2014 5.51 4415.20 4413.60 14.80
11/3/2014 5.51 4415.20 4413.60 14.80
11/3/2014 5.51 4415.20 4413.60 14.79
11/4/2014 5.51 4415.20 4413.60 14.78
11/4/2014 5.51 4415.20 4413.60 14.78
74 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
11/5/2014 5.51 4415.20 4413.60 14.77
11/5/2014 5.52 4415.20 4413.70 14.77
11/6/2014 5.52 4415.20 4413.70 14.76
11/6/2014 5.52 4415.20 4413.70 14.76
11/7/2014 5.52 4415.20 4413.70 14.75
11/8/2014 5.52 4415.30 4413.70 14.75
11/8/2014 5.52 4415.30 4413.70 14.74
11/9/2014 5.53 4415.30 4413.70 14.74
11/9/2014 5.53 4415.30 4413.70 14.73
11/10/2014 5.53 4415.30 4413.70 14.72
11/10/2014 5.53 4415.30 4413.70 14.72
11/11/2014 5.53 4415.30 4413.70 14.71
11/11/2014 5.53 4415.30 4413.70 14.71
11/12/2014 5.53 4415.30 4413.70 14.70
11/13/2014 5.54 4415.30 4413.70 14.70
11/13/2014 5.54 4415.30 4413.70 14.69
11/14/2014 5.54 4415.30 4413.80 14.69
11/14/2014 5.54 4415.30 4413.80 14.68
11/15/2014 5.54 4415.30 4413.80 14.68
11/15/2014 5.54 4415.30 4413.80 14.67
11/16/2014 5.55 4415.30 4413.80 14.67
11/16/2014 5.55 4415.30 4413.80 14.66
11/17/2014 5.55 4415.30 4413.80 14.65
11/18/2014 5.55 4415.40 4413.80 14.65
11/18/2014 5.55 4415.40 4413.80 14.64
11/19/2014 5.55 4415.40 4413.80 14.64
11/19/2014 5.55 4415.40 4413.80 14.63
11/20/2014 5.56 4415.40 4413.80 14.63
11/20/2014 5.56 4415.40 4413.80 14.62
11/21/2014 5.56 4415.40 4413.80 14.62
11/21/2014 5.56 4415.40 4413.80 14.61
11/22/2014 5.56 4415.40 4413.90 14.61
11/23/2014 5.56 4415.40 4413.90 14.60
11/23/2014 5.57 4415.40 4413.90 14.59
11/24/2014 5.57 4415.40 4413.90 14.59
11/24/2014 5.57 4415.40 4413.90 14.58
11/25/2014 5.57 4415.40 4413.90 14.58
11/25/2014 5.57 4415.40 4413.90 14.57
11/26/2014 5.57 4415.40 4413.90 14.57
11/26/2014 5.57 4415.40 4413.90 14.56
11/27/2014 5.58 4415.40 4413.90 14.56
11/28/2014 5.58 4415.40 4413.90 14.55
11/28/2014 5.58 4415.50 4413.90 14.55
11/29/2014 5.58 4415.50 4413.90 14.54
11/29/2014 5.58 4415.50 4413.90 14.54
11/30/2014 5.58 4415.50 4414.00 14.53
11/30/2014 5.58 4415.50 4414.00 14.52
12/1/2014 5.59 4415.50 4414.00 14.52
12/1/2014 5.59 4415.50 4414.00 14.51
75 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
12/2/2014 5.59 4415.50 4414.00 14.50
12/3/2014 5.59 4415.50 4414.00 14.50
12/3/2014 5.59 4415.50 4414.00 14.49
12/4/2014 5.59 4415.50 4414.00 14.48
12/4/2014 5.60 4415.50 4414.00 14.47
12/5/2014 5.60 4415.50 4414.00 14.47
12/5/2014 5.60 4415.50 4414.00 14.46
12/6/2014 5.60 4415.60 4414.00 14.45
12/6/2014 5.60 4415.60 4414.00 14.44
12/7/2014 5.60 4415.60 4414.00 14.43
12/8/2014 5.60 4415.60 4414.00 14.43
12/8/2014 5.61 4415.60 4414.10 14.42
12/9/2014 5.61 4415.60 4414.10 14.41
12/9/2014 5.61 4415.60 4414.10 14.40
12/10/2014 5.61 4415.60 4414.10 14.40
12/10/2014 5.61 4415.60 4414.10 14.39
12/11/2014 5.61 4415.60 4414.10 14.38
12/11/2014 5.62 4415.60 4414.10 14.37
12/12/2014 5.62 4415.60 4414.10 14.37
12/13/2014 5.62 4415.60 4414.10 14.36
12/13/2014 5.62 4415.60 4414.10 14.35
12/14/2014 5.62 4415.70 4414.10 14.34
12/14/2014 5.62 4415.70 4414.10 14.34
12/15/2014 5.62 4415.70 4414.10 14.33
12/15/2014 5.63 4415.70 4414.10 14.32
12/16/2014 5.63 4415.70 4414.10 14.31
12/16/2014 5.63 4415.70 4414.20 14.30
12/17/2014 5.63 4415.70 4414.20 14.30
12/18/2014 5.63 4415.70 4414.20 14.29
12/18/2014 5.63 4415.70 4414.20 14.28
12/19/2014 5.64 4415.70 4414.20 14.27
12/19/2014 5.64 4415.70 4414.20 14.27
12/20/2014 5.64 4415.70 4414.20 14.26
12/20/2014 5.64 4415.70 4414.20 14.25
12/21/2014 5.64 4415.80 4414.20 14.24
12/21/2014 5.64 4415.80 4414.20 14.24
12/22/2014 5.64 4415.80 4414.20 14.23
12/23/2014 5.65 4415.80 4414.20 14.22
12/23/2014 5.65 4415.80 4414.20 14.21
12/24/2014 5.65 4415.80 4414.20 14.21
12/24/2014 5.65 4415.80 4414.20 14.20
12/25/2014 5.65 4415.80 4414.30 14.19
12/25/2014 5.65 4415.80 4414.30 14.18
12/26/2014 5.65 4415.80 4414.30 14.17
12/26/2014 5.66 4415.80 4414.30 14.17
12/27/2014 5.66 4415.80 4414.30 14.16
12/28/2014 5.66 4415.80 4414.30 14.15
12/28/2014 5.66 4415.90 4414.30 14.14
12/29/2014 5.66 4415.90 4414.30 14.14
76 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
12/29/2014 5.66 4415.90 4414.30 14.13
12/30/2014 5.67 4415.90 4414.30 14.12
12/30/2014 5.67 4415.90 4414.30 14.11
12/31/2014 5.67 4415.90 4414.30 14.11
12/31/2014 5.67 4415.90 4414.30 14.10
1/1/2015 5.67 4415.90 4414.30 14.09
1/2/2015 5.67 4415.90 4414.40 14.08
1/2/2015 5.67 4415.90 4414.40 14.07
1/3/2015 5.68 4415.90 4414.40 14.06
1/3/2015 5.68 4415.90 4414.40 14.06
1/4/2015 5.68 4416.00 4414.40 14.05
1/4/2015 5.68 4416.00 4414.40 14.04
1/5/2015 5.68 4416.00 4414.40 14.03
1/5/2015 5.68 4416.00 4414.40 14.02
1/6/2015 5.69 4416.00 4414.40 14.01
1/7/2015 5.69 4416.00 4414.40 14.00
1/7/2015 5.69 4416.00 4414.40 13.99
1/8/2015 5.69 4416.00 4414.40 13.99
1/8/2015 5.69 4416.00 4414.40 13.98
1/9/2015 5.69 4416.00 4414.40 13.97
1/9/2015 5.69 4416.00 4414.40 13.96
1/10/2015 5.70 4416.10 4414.50 13.95
1/10/2015 5.70 4416.10 4414.50 13.94
1/11/2015 5.70 4416.10 4414.50 13.93
1/12/2015 5.70 4416.10 4414.50 13.92
1/12/2015 5.70 4416.10 4414.50 13.91
1/13/2015 5.70 4416.10 4414.50 13.91
1/13/2015 5.71 4416.10 4414.50 13.90
1/14/2015 5.71 4416.10 4414.50 13.89
1/14/2015 5.71 4416.10 4414.50 13.88
1/15/2015 5.71 4416.10 4414.50 13.87
1/15/2015 5.71 4416.10 4414.50 13.86
1/16/2015 5.71 4416.10 4414.50 13.85
1/17/2015 5.71 4416.20 4414.50 13.84
1/17/2015 5.72 4416.20 4414.50 13.84
1/18/2015 5.72 4416.20 4414.50 13.83
1/18/2015 5.72 4416.20 4414.60 13.82
1/19/2015 5.72 4416.20 4414.60 13.81
1/19/2015 5.72 4416.20 4414.60 13.80
1/20/2015 5.72 4416.20 4414.60 13.79
1/20/2015 5.72 4416.20 4414.60 13.78
1/21/2015 5.73 4416.20 4414.60 13.77
1/22/2015 5.73 4416.20 4414.60 13.77
1/22/2015 5.73 4416.20 4414.60 13.76
1/23/2015 5.73 4416.30 4414.60 13.75
1/23/2015 5.73 4416.30 4414.60 13.74
1/24/2015 5.73 4416.30 4414.60 13.73
1/24/2015 5.74 4416.30 4414.60 13.72
1/25/2015 5.74 4416.30 4414.60 13.71
77 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
1/25/2015 5.74 4416.30 4414.60 13.70
1/26/2015 5.74 4416.30 4414.60 13.70
1/27/2015 5.74 4416.30 4414.70 13.69
1/27/2015 5.74 4416.30 4414.70 13.68
1/28/2015 5.74 4416.30 4414.70 13.67
1/28/2015 5.75 4416.30 4414.70 13.66
1/29/2015 5.75 4416.30 4414.70 13.65
1/29/2015 5.75 4416.40 4414.70 13.64
1/30/2015 5.75 4416.40 4414.70 13.63
1/30/2015 5.75 4416.40 4414.70 13.63
1/31/2015 5.75 4416.40 4414.70 13.62
2/1/2015 5.76 4416.40 4414.70 13.61
2/1/2015 5.76 4416.40 4414.70 13.60
2/2/2015 5.76 4416.40 4414.70 13.59
2/2/2015 5.76 4416.40 4414.70 13.58
2/3/2015 5.76 4416.40 4414.70 13.57
2/3/2015 5.76 4416.40 4414.70 13.56
2/4/2015 5.76 4416.40 4414.80 13.55
2/4/2015 5.77 4416.50 4414.80 13.54
2/5/2015 5.77 4416.50 4414.80 13.54
2/6/2015 5.77 4416.50 4414.80 13.53
2/6/2015 5.77 4416.50 4414.80 13.52
2/7/2015 5.77 4416.50 4414.80 13.51
2/7/2015 5.77 4416.50 4414.80 13.50
2/8/2015 5.78 4416.50 4414.80 13.49
2/8/2015 5.78 4416.50 4414.80 13.48
2/9/2015 5.78 4416.50 4414.80 13.47
2/9/2015 5.78 4416.50 4414.80 13.46
2/10/2015 5.78 4416.50 4414.80 13.46
2/11/2015 5.78 4416.60 4414.80 13.45
2/11/2015 5.78 4416.60 4414.80 13.44
2/12/2015 5.79 4416.60 4414.90 13.43
2/12/2015 5.79 4416.60 4414.90 13.42
2/13/2015 5.79 4416.60 4414.90 13.41
2/13/2015 5.79 4416.60 4414.90 13.40
2/14/2015 5.79 4416.60 4414.90 13.39
2/14/2015 5.79 4416.60 4414.90 13.38
2/15/2015 5.79 4416.60 4414.90 13.37
2/16/2015 5.80 4416.60 4414.90 13.37
2/16/2015 5.80 4416.60 4414.90 13.36
2/17/2015 5.80 4416.70 4414.90 13.35
2/17/2015 5.80 4416.70 4414.90 13.34
2/18/2015 5.80 4416.70 4414.90 13.33
2/18/2015 5.80 4416.70 4414.90 13.32
2/19/2015 5.81 4416.70 4414.90 13.31
2/19/2015 5.81 4416.70 4414.90 13.30
2/20/2015 5.81 4416.70 4415.00 13.29
2/21/2015 5.81 4416.70 4415.00 13.29
2/21/2015 5.81 4416.70 4415.00 13.28
78 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
2/22/2015 5.81 4416.70 4415.00 13.27
2/22/2015 5.81 4416.70 4415.00 13.26
2/23/2015 5.82 4416.80 4415.00 13.25
2/23/2015 5.82 4416.80 4415.00 13.24
2/24/2015 5.82 4416.80 4415.00 13.23
2/24/2015 5.82 4416.80 4415.00 13.22
2/25/2015 5.82 4416.80 4415.00 13.21
2/26/2015 5.82 4416.80 4415.00 13.20
2/26/2015 5.83 4416.80 4415.00 13.20
2/27/2015 5.83 4416.80 4415.00 13.19
2/27/2015 5.83 4416.80 4415.00 13.18
2/28/2015 5.83 4416.80 4415.00 13.17
2/28/2015 5.83 4416.80 4415.10 13.16
3/1/2015 5.83 4416.80 4415.10 13.15
3/1/2015 5.83 4416.90 4415.10 13.14
3/2/2015 5.84 4416.90 4415.10 13.13
3/3/2015 5.84 4416.90 4415.10 13.12
3/3/2015 5.84 4416.90 4415.10 13.11
3/4/2015 5.84 4416.90 4415.10 13.10
3/4/2015 5.84 4416.90 4415.10 13.09
3/5/2015 5.84 4416.90 4415.10 13.08
3/5/2015 5.85 4416.90 4415.10 13.08
3/6/2015 5.85 4416.90 4415.10 13.07
3/6/2015 5.85 4416.90 4415.10 13.06
3/7/2015 5.85 4417.00 4415.10 13.05
3/8/2015 5.85 4417.00 4415.10 13.04
3/8/2015 5.85 4417.00 4415.10 13.03
3/9/2015 5.85 4417.00 4415.20 13.02
3/9/2015 5.86 4417.00 4415.20 13.01
3/10/2015 5.86 4417.00 4415.20 13.00
3/10/2015 5.86 4417.00 4415.20 12.99
3/11/2015 5.86 4417.00 4415.20 12.98
3/11/2015 5.86 4417.00 4415.20 12.97
3/12/2015 5.86 4417.00 4415.20 12.96
3/13/2015 5.86 4417.00 4415.20 12.95
3/13/2015 5.87 4417.10 4415.20 12.94
3/14/2015 5.87 4417.10 4415.20 12.93
3/14/2015 5.87 4417.10 4415.20 12.92
3/15/2015 5.87 4417.10 4415.20 12.91
3/15/2015 5.87 4417.10 4415.20 12.90
3/16/2015 5.87 4417.10 4415.20 12.89
3/16/2015 5.88 4417.10 4415.30 12.89
3/17/2015 5.88 4417.10 4415.30 12.88
3/18/2015 5.88 4417.10 4415.30 12.87
3/18/2015 5.88 4417.10 4415.30 12.86
3/19/2015 5.88 4417.20 4415.30 12.85
3/19/2015 5.88 4417.20 4415.30 12.84
3/20/2015 5.88 4417.20 4415.30 12.83
3/20/2015 5.89 4417.20 4415.30 12.82
79 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
3/21/2015 5.89 4417.20 4415.30 12.81
3/21/2015 5.89 4417.20 4415.30 12.80
3/22/2015 5.89 4417.20 4415.30 12.79
3/23/2015 5.89 4417.20 4415.30 12.78
3/23/2015 5.89 4417.20 4415.30 12.77
3/24/2015 5.90 4417.20 4415.30 12.76
3/24/2015 5.90 4417.20 4415.30 12.75
3/25/2015 5.90 4417.30 4415.40 12.74
3/25/2015 5.90 4417.30 4415.40 12.73
3/26/2015 5.90 4417.30 4415.40 12.72
3/26/2015 5.90 4417.30 4415.40 12.71
3/27/2015 5.90 4417.30 4415.40 12.70
3/28/2015 5.91 4417.30 4415.40 12.70
3/28/2015 5.91 4417.30 4415.40 12.69
3/29/2015 5.91 4417.30 4415.40 12.68
3/29/2015 5.91 4417.30 4415.40 12.67
3/30/2015 5.91 4417.30 4415.40 12.66
3/30/2015 5.91 4417.40 4415.40 12.65
3/31/2015 5.91 4417.40 4415.40 12.64
3/31/2015 5.92 4417.40 4415.40 12.63
4/1/2015 5.92 4417.40 4415.40 12.62
4/2/2015 5.92 4417.40 4415.40 12.61
4/2/2015 5.92 4417.40 4415.50 12.60
4/3/2015 5.92 4417.40 4415.50 12.60
4/3/2015 5.92 4417.40 4415.50 12.59
4/4/2015 5.93 4417.40 4415.50 12.58
4/4/2015 5.93 4417.40 4415.50 12.57
4/5/2015 5.93 4417.40 4415.50 12.57
4/5/2015 5.93 4417.40 4415.50 12.56
4/6/2015 5.93 4417.40 4415.50 12.55
4/7/2015 5.93 4417.50 4415.50 12.54
4/7/2015 5.93 4417.50 4415.50 12.54
4/8/2015 5.94 4417.50 4415.50 12.53
4/8/2015 5.94 4417.50 4415.50 12.52
4/9/2015 5.94 4417.50 4415.50 12.51
4/9/2015 5.94 4417.50 4415.50 12.50
4/10/2015 5.94 4417.50 4415.50 12.50
4/10/2015 5.94 4417.50 4415.60 12.49
4/11/2015 5.95 4417.50 4415.60 12.48
4/12/2015 5.95 4417.50 4415.60 12.47
4/12/2015 5.95 4417.50 4415.60 12.47
4/13/2015 5.95 4417.50 4415.60 12.46
4/13/2015 5.95 4417.50 4415.60 12.45
4/14/2015 5.95 4417.60 4415.60 12.44
4/14/2015 5.95 4417.60 4415.60 12.44
4/15/2015 5.96 4417.60 4415.60 12.43
4/15/2015 5.96 4417.60 4415.60 12.42
4/16/2015 5.96 4417.60 4415.60 12.41
4/17/2015 5.96 4417.60 4415.60 12.40
80 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
4/17/2015 5.96 4417.60 4415.60 12.40
4/18/2015 5.96 4417.60 4415.60 12.39
4/18/2015 5.97 4417.60 4415.70 12.38
4/19/2015 5.97 4417.60 4415.70 12.37
4/19/2015 5.97 4417.60 4415.70 12.37
4/20/2015 5.97 4417.60 4415.70 12.36
4/20/2015 5.97 4417.60 4415.70 12.35
4/21/2015 5.97 4417.70 4415.70 12.34
4/22/2015 5.97 4417.70 4415.70 12.34
4/22/2015 5.98 4417.70 4415.70 12.33
4/23/2015 5.98 4417.70 4415.70 12.32
4/23/2015 5.98 4417.70 4415.70 12.31
4/24/2015 5.98 4417.70 4415.70 12.30
4/24/2015 5.98 4417.70 4415.70 12.30
4/25/2015 5.98 4417.70 4415.70 12.29
4/25/2015 5.98 4417.70 4415.70 12.28
4/26/2015 5.99 4417.70 4415.70 12.27
4/27/2015 5.99 4417.70 4415.80 12.27
4/27/2015 5.99 4417.70 4415.80 12.26
4/28/2015 5.99 4417.70 4415.80 12.25
4/28/2015 5.99 4417.80 4415.80 12.24
4/29/2015 5.99 4417.80 4415.80 12.24
4/29/2015 6.00 4417.80 4415.80 12.23
4/30/2015 6.00 4417.80 4415.80 12.22
4/30/2015 6.00 4417.80 4415.80 12.21
5/1/2015 6.00 4417.80 4415.80 12.21
5/2/2015 6.00 4417.80 4415.80 12.20
5/2/2015 6.00 4417.80 4415.80 12.19
5/3/2015 6.00 4417.80 4415.80 12.18
5/3/2015 6.01 4417.80 4415.80 12.18
5/4/2015 6.01 4417.80 4415.80 12.17
5/4/2015 6.01 4417.80 4415.80 12.16
5/5/2015 6.01 4417.80 4415.90 12.16
5/5/2015 6.01 4417.90 4415.90 12.15
5/6/2015 6.01 4417.90 4415.90 12.14
5/7/2015 6.02 4417.90 4415.90 12.13
5/7/2015 6.02 4417.90 4415.90 12.13
5/8/2015 6.02 4417.90 4415.90 12.12
5/8/2015 6.02 4417.90 4415.90 12.11
5/9/2015 6.02 4417.90 4415.90 12.11
5/9/2015 6.02 4417.90 4415.90 12.10
5/10/2015 6.02 4417.90 4415.90 12.09
5/10/2015 6.03 4417.90 4415.90 12.09
5/11/2015 6.03 4417.90 4415.90 12.08
5/12/2015 6.03 4417.90 4415.90 12.07
5/12/2015 6.03 4417.90 4415.90 12.06
5/13/2015 6.03 4417.90 4415.90 12.06
5/13/2015 6.03 4418.00 4416.00 12.05
5/14/2015 6.04 4418.00 4416.00 12.04
81 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
5/14/2015 6.04 4418.00 4416.00 12.04
5/15/2015 6.04 4418.00 4416.00 12.03
5/15/2015 6.04 4418.00 4416.00 12.02
5/16/2015 6.04 4418.00 4416.00 12.02
5/17/2015 6.04 4418.00 4416.00 12.01
5/17/2015 6.04 4418.00 4416.00 12.00
5/18/2015 6.05 4418.00 4416.00 11.99
5/18/2015 6.05 4418.00 4416.00 11.99
5/19/2015 6.05 4418.00 4416.00 11.98
5/19/2015 6.05 4418.00 4416.00 11.97
5/20/2015 6.05 4418.00 4416.00 11.97
5/20/2015 6.05 4418.00 4416.00 11.96
5/21/2015 6.05 4418.00 4416.10 11.95
5/22/2015 6.06 4418.10 4416.10 11.94
5/22/2015 6.06 4418.10 4416.10 11.94
5/23/2015 6.06 4418.10 4416.10 11.93
5/23/2015 6.06 4418.10 4416.10 11.92
5/24/2015 6.06 4418.10 4416.10 11.92
5/24/2015 6.06 4418.10 4416.10 11.91
5/25/2015 6.07 4418.10 4416.10 11.90
5/25/2015 6.07 4418.10 4416.10 11.90
5/26/2015 6.07 4418.10 4416.10 11.89
5/27/2015 6.07 4418.10 4416.10 11.88
5/27/2015 6.07 4418.10 4416.10 11.87
5/28/2015 6.07 4418.10 4416.10 11.87
5/28/2015 6.07 4418.10 4416.10 11.86
5/29/2015 6.08 4418.10 4416.10 11.85
5/29/2015 6.08 4418.20 4416.20 11.85
5/30/2015 6.08 4418.20 4416.20 11.84
5/30/2015 6.08 4418.20 4416.20 11.83
5/31/2015 6.08 4418.20 4416.20 11.83
6/1/2015 6.08 4418.20 4416.20 11.82
6/1/2015 6.09 4418.20 4416.20 11.81
6/2/2015 6.09 4418.20 4416.20 11.81
6/2/2015 6.09 4418.20 4416.20 11.80
6/3/2015 6.09 4418.20 4416.20 11.80
6/3/2015 6.09 4418.20 4416.20 11.79
6/4/2015 6.09 4418.20 4416.20 11.79
6/4/2015 6.09 4418.20 4416.20 11.78
6/5/2015 6.10 4418.20 4416.20 11.78
6/6/2015 6.10 4418.20 4416.20 11.77
6/6/2015 6.10 4418.20 4416.20 11.77
6/7/2015 6.10 4418.20 4416.30 11.76
6/7/2015 6.10 4418.20 4416.30 11.76
6/8/2015 6.10 4418.20 4416.30 11.75
6/8/2015 6.11 4418.30 4416.30 11.75
6/9/2015 6.11 4418.30 4416.30 11.74
6/9/2015 6.11 4418.30 4416.30 11.74
6/10/2015 6.11 4418.30 4416.30 11.73
82 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
6/11/2015 6.11 4418.30 4416.30 11.73
6/11/2015 6.11 4418.30 4416.30 11.72
6/12/2015 6.11 4418.30 4416.30 11.72
6/12/2015 6.12 4418.30 4416.30 11.71
6/13/2015 6.12 4418.30 4416.30 11.71
6/13/2015 6.12 4418.30 4416.30 11.70
6/14/2015 6.12 4418.30 4416.30 11.70
6/14/2015 6.12 4418.30 4416.30 11.69
6/15/2015 6.12 4418.30 4416.40 11.69
6/16/2015 6.12 4418.30 4416.40 11.68
6/16/2015 6.13 4418.30 4416.40 11.68
6/17/2015 6.13 4418.30 4416.40 11.67
6/17/2015 6.13 4418.30 4416.40 11.67
6/18/2015 6.13 4418.30 4416.40 11.66
6/18/2015 6.13 4418.30 4416.40 11.66
6/19/2015 6.13 4418.30 4416.40 11.65
6/19/2015 6.14 4418.40 4416.40 11.65
6/20/2015 6.14 4418.40 4416.40 11.64
6/21/2015 6.14 4418.40 4416.40 11.64
6/21/2015 6.14 4418.40 4416.40 11.63
6/22/2015 6.14 4418.40 4416.40 11.63
6/22/2015 6.14 4418.40 4416.40 11.62
6/23/2015 6.14 4418.40 4416.50 11.62
6/23/2015 6.15 4418.40 4416.50 11.61
6/24/2015 6.15 4418.40 4416.50 11.61
6/24/2015 6.15 4418.40 4416.50 11.60
6/25/2015 6.15 4418.40 4416.50 11.60
6/26/2015 6.15 4418.40 4416.50 11.59
6/26/2015 6.15 4418.40 4416.50 11.59
6/27/2015 6.16 4418.40 4416.50 11.58
6/27/2015 6.16 4418.40 4416.50 11.58
6/28/2015 6.16 4418.40 4416.50 11.57
6/28/2015 6.16 4418.40 4416.50 11.57
6/29/2015 6.16 4418.40 4416.50 11.56
6/29/2015 6.16 4418.40 4416.50 11.56
6/30/2015 6.16 4418.40 4416.50 11.55
7/1/2015 6.17 4418.50 4416.50 11.55
7/1/2015 6.17 4418.50 4416.60 11.55
7/2/2015 6.17 4418.50 4416.60 11.55
7/2/2015 6.17 4418.50 4416.60 11.55
7/3/2015 6.17 4418.50 4416.60 11.55
7/3/2015 6.17 4418.50 4416.60 11.55
7/4/2015 6.18 4418.50 4416.60 11.54
7/4/2015 6.18 4418.50 4416.60 11.54
7/5/2015 6.18 4418.50 4416.60 11.54
7/6/2015 6.18 4418.50 4416.60 11.54
7/6/2015 6.18 4418.50 4416.60 11.54
7/7/2015 6.18 4418.50 4416.60 11.54
7/7/2015 6.18 4418.50 4416.60 11.54
83 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
7/8/2015 6.19 4418.50 4416.60 11.54
7/8/2015 6.19 4418.50 4416.60 11.54
7/9/2015 6.19 4418.50 4416.60 11.54
7/9/2015 6.19 4418.50 4416.70 11.54
7/10/2015 6.19 4418.50 4416.70 11.53
7/11/2015 6.19 4418.50 4416.70 11.53
7/11/2015 6.19 4418.50 4416.70 11.53
7/12/2015 6.20 4418.50 4416.70 11.53
7/12/2015 6.20 4418.50 4416.70 11.53
7/13/2015 6.20 4418.50 4416.70 11.53
7/13/2015 6.20 4418.50 4416.70 11.53
7/14/2015 6.20 4418.50 4416.70 11.53
7/14/2015 6.20 4418.50 4416.70 11.53
7/15/2015 6.21 4418.50 4416.70 11.53
7/16/2015 6.21 4418.50 4416.70 11.53
7/16/2015 6.21 4418.50 4416.70 11.53
7/17/2015 6.21 4418.50 4416.70 11.52
7/17/2015 6.21 4418.50 4416.70 11.52
7/18/2015 6.21 4418.50 4416.80 11.52
7/18/2015 6.21 4418.50 4416.80 11.52
7/19/2015 6.22 4418.50 4416.80 11.52
7/19/2015 6.22 4418.50 4416.80 11.52
7/20/2015 6.22 4418.50 4416.80 11.52
7/21/2015 6.22 4418.50 4416.80 11.52
7/21/2015 6.22 4418.50 4416.80 11.52
7/22/2015 6.22 4418.50 4416.80 11.52
7/22/2015 6.23 4418.50 4416.80 11.52
7/23/2015 6.23 4418.50 4416.80 11.51
7/23/2015 6.23 4418.50 4416.80 11.51
7/24/2015 6.23 4418.50 4416.80 11.51
7/24/2015 6.23 4418.50 4416.80 11.51
7/25/2015 6.23 4418.50 4416.80 11.51
7/26/2015 6.23 4418.50 4416.90 11.51
7/26/2015 6.24 4418.50 4416.90 11.51
7/27/2015 6.24 4418.50 4416.90 11.51
7/27/2015 6.24 4418.50 4416.90 11.51
7/28/2015 6.24 4418.50 4416.90 11.51
7/28/2015 6.24 4418.50 4416.90 11.51
7/29/2015 6.24 4418.50 4416.90 11.50
7/29/2015 6.25 4418.50 4416.90 11.50
7/30/2015 6.25 4418.50 4416.90 11.50
7/31/2015 6.25 4418.50 4416.90 11.50
7/31/2015 6.25 4418.50 4416.90 11.50
8/1/2015 6.25 4418.50 4416.90 11.50
8/1/2015 6.25 4418.50 4416.90 11.50
8/2/2015 6.25 4418.50 4416.90 11.50
8/2/2015 6.26 4418.50 4416.90 11.50
8/3/2015 6.26 4418.50 4417.00 11.50
8/3/2015 6.26 4418.50 4417.00 11.50
84 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
8/4/2015 6.26 4418.50 4417.00 11.50
8/5/2015 6.26 4418.50 4417.00 11.50
8/5/2015 6.26 4418.50 4417.00 11.49
8/6/2015 6.26 4418.50 4417.00 11.49
8/6/2015 6.27 4418.50 4417.00 11.49
8/7/2015 6.27 4418.50 4417.00 11.49
8/7/2015 6.27 4418.50 4417.00 11.49
8/8/2015 6.27 4418.50 4417.00 11.49
8/8/2015 6.27 4418.50 4417.00 11.49
8/9/2015 6.27 4418.50 4417.00 11.49
8/10/2015 6.28 4418.50 4417.00 11.49
8/10/2015 6.28 4418.50 4417.00 11.49
8/11/2015 6.28 4418.50 4417.00 11.49
8/11/2015 6.28 4418.50 4417.10 11.49
8/12/2015 6.28 4418.50 4417.10 11.48
8/12/2015 6.28 4418.50 4417.10 11.48
8/13/2015 6.28 4418.50 4417.10 11.48
8/13/2015 6.29 4418.50 4417.10 11.48
8/14/2015 6.29 4418.50 4417.10 11.48
8/15/2015 6.29 4418.50 4417.10 11.48
8/15/2015 6.29 4418.50 4417.10 11.48
8/16/2015 6.29 4418.50 4417.10 11.48
8/16/2015 6.29 4418.50 4417.10 11.48
8/17/2015 6.30 4418.50 4417.10 11.48
8/17/2015 6.30 4418.50 4417.10 11.48
8/18/2015 6.30 4418.50 4417.10 11.48
8/18/2015 6.30 4418.50 4417.10 11.48
8/19/2015 6.30 4418.50 4417.10 11.47
8/20/2015 6.30 4418.50 4417.20 11.47
8/20/2015 6.30 4418.50 4417.20 11.47
8/21/2015 6.31 4418.50 4417.20 11.47
8/21/2015 6.31 4418.50 4417.20 11.47
8/22/2015 6.31 4418.50 4417.20 11.47
8/22/2015 6.31 4418.50 4417.20 11.47
8/23/2015 6.31 4418.50 4417.20 11.47
8/23/2015 6.31 4418.50 4417.20 11.47
8/24/2015 6.31 4418.50 4417.20 11.47
8/25/2015 6.32 4418.50 4417.20 11.47
8/25/2015 6.32 4418.50 4417.20 11.47
8/26/2015 6.32 4418.50 4417.20 11.46
8/26/2015 6.32 4418.50 4417.20 11.46
8/27/2015 6.32 4418.50 4417.20 11.46
8/27/2015 6.32 4418.50 4417.20 11.46
8/28/2015 6.33 4418.50 4417.30 11.46
8/28/2015 6.33 4418.50 4417.30 11.46
8/29/2015 6.33 4418.50 4417.30 11.46
8/30/2015 6.33 4418.50 4417.30 11.46
8/30/2015 6.33 4418.50 4417.30 11.46
8/31/2015 6.33 4418.50 4417.30 11.46
85 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
8/31/2015 6.33 4418.50 4417.30 11.46
9/1/2015 6.34 4418.50 4417.30 11.46
9/1/2015 6.34 4418.50 4417.30 11.46
9/2/2015 6.34 4418.50 4417.30 11.45
9/2/2015 6.34 4418.50 4417.30 11.45
9/3/2015 6.34 4418.50 4417.30 11.45
9/4/2015 6.34 4418.50 4417.30 11.45
9/4/2015 6.35 4418.50 4417.30 11.45
9/5/2015 6.35 4418.60 4417.40 11.45
9/5/2015 6.35 4418.60 4417.40 11.45
9/6/2015 6.35 4418.60 4417.40 11.45
9/6/2015 6.35 4418.60 4417.40 11.45
9/7/2015 6.35 4418.60 4417.40 11.45
9/7/2015 6.35 4418.60 4417.40 11.45
9/8/2015 6.36 4418.60 4417.40 11.44
9/9/2015 6.36 4418.60 4417.40 11.44
9/9/2015 6.36 4418.60 4417.40 11.44
9/10/2015 6.36 4418.60 4417.40 11.44
9/10/2015 6.36 4418.60 4417.40 11.44
9/11/2015 6.36 4418.60 4417.40 11.44
9/11/2015 6.37 4418.60 4417.40 11.44
9/12/2015 6.37 4418.60 4417.40 11.44
9/12/2015 6.37 4418.60 4417.40 11.44
9/13/2015 6.37 4418.60 4417.50 11.44
9/14/2015 6.37 4418.60 4417.50 11.44
9/14/2015 6.37 4418.60 4417.50 11.43
9/15/2015 6.37 4418.60 4417.50 11.43
9/15/2015 6.38 4418.60 4417.50 11.43
9/16/2015 6.38 4418.60 4417.50 11.43
9/16/2015 6.38 4418.60 4417.50 11.43
9/17/2015 6.38 4418.60 4417.50 11.43
9/17/2015 6.38 4418.60 4417.50 11.43
9/18/2015 6.38 4418.60 4417.50 11.43
9/19/2015 6.38 4418.60 4417.50 11.43
9/19/2015 6.39 4418.60 4417.50 11.43
9/20/2015 6.39 4418.60 4417.50 11.42
9/20/2015 6.39 4418.60 4417.50 11.42
9/21/2015 6.39 4418.60 4417.50 11.42
9/21/2015 6.39 4418.60 4417.60 11.42
9/22/2015 6.39 4418.60 4417.60 11.42
9/22/2015 6.40 4418.60 4417.60 11.42
9/23/2015 6.40 4418.60 4417.60 11.42
9/24/2015 6.40 4418.60 4417.60 11.42
9/24/2015 6.40 4418.60 4417.60 11.42
9/25/2015 6.40 4418.60 4417.60 11.42
9/25/2015 6.40 4418.60 4417.60 11.42
9/26/2015 6.40 4418.60 4417.60 11.41
9/26/2015 6.41 4418.60 4417.60 11.41
9/27/2015 6.41 4418.60 4417.60 11.41
86 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
9/27/2015 6.41 4418.60 4417.60 11.41
9/28/2015 6.41 4418.60 4417.60 11.41
9/29/2015 6.41 4418.60 4417.60 11.41
9/29/2015 6.41 4418.60 4417.60 11.41
9/30/2015 6.42 4418.60 4417.70 11.41
9/30/2015 6.42 4418.60 4417.70 11.41
10/1/2015 6.42 4418.60 4417.70 11.41
10/1/2015 6.42 4418.60 4417.70 11.40
10/2/2015 6.42 4418.60 4417.70 11.40
10/2/2015 6.42 4418.60 4417.70 11.40
10/3/2015 6.42 4418.60 4417.70 11.40
10/4/2015 6.43 4418.60 4417.70 11.39
10/4/2015 6.43 4418.60 4417.70 11.39
10/5/2015 6.43 4418.60 4417.70 11.39
10/5/2015 6.43 4418.60 4417.70 11.39
10/6/2015 6.43 4418.60 4417.70 11.38
10/6/2015 6.43 4418.60 4417.70 11.38
10/7/2015 6.44 4418.60 4417.70 11.38
10/7/2015 6.44 4418.60 4417.80 11.37
10/8/2015 6.44 4418.60 4417.80 11.37
10/9/2015 6.44 4418.60 4417.80 11.37
10/9/2015 6.44 4418.60 4417.80 11.37
10/10/2015 6.44 4418.60 4417.80 11.36
10/10/2015 6.44 4418.60 4417.80 11.36
10/11/2015 6.45 4418.60 4417.80 11.36
10/11/2015 6.45 4418.60 4417.80 11.36
10/12/2015 6.45 4418.60 4417.80 11.35
10/12/2015 6.45 4418.70 4417.80 11.35
10/13/2015 6.45 4418.70 4417.80 11.35
10/14/2015 6.45 4418.70 4417.80 11.34
10/14/2015 6.45 4418.70 4417.80 11.34
10/15/2015 6.46 4418.70 4417.80 11.34
10/15/2015 6.46 4418.70 4417.80 11.34
10/16/2015 6.46 4418.70 4417.90 11.33
10/16/2015 6.46 4418.70 4417.90 11.33
10/17/2015 6.46 4418.70 4417.90 11.33
10/17/2015 6.46 4418.70 4417.90 11.33
10/18/2015 6.47 4418.70 4417.90 11.32
10/19/2015 6.47 4418.70 4417.90 11.32
10/19/2015 6.47 4418.70 4417.90 11.32
10/20/2015 6.47 4418.70 4417.90 11.31
10/20/2015 6.47 4418.70 4417.90 11.31
10/21/2015 6.47 4418.70 4417.90 11.31
10/21/2015 6.47 4418.70 4417.90 11.31
10/22/2015 6.48 4418.70 4417.90 11.30
10/22/2015 6.48 4418.70 4417.90 11.30
10/23/2015 6.48 4418.70 4417.90 11.30
10/24/2015 6.48 4418.70 4417.90 11.30
10/24/2015 6.48 4418.70 4418.00 11.29
87 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
10/25/2015 6.48 4418.70 4418.00 11.29
10/25/2015 6.49 4418.70 4418.00 11.29
10/26/2015 6.49 4418.70 4418.00 11.28
10/26/2015 6.49 4418.70 4418.00 11.28
10/27/2015 6.49 4418.70 4418.00 11.28
10/27/2015 6.49 4418.70 4418.00 11.28
10/28/2015 6.49 4418.70 4418.00 11.27
10/29/2015 6.49 4418.70 4418.00 11.27
10/29/2015 6.50 4418.70 4418.00 11.27
10/30/2015 6.50 4418.70 4418.00 11.27
10/30/2015 6.50 4418.70 4418.00 11.26
10/31/2015 6.50 4418.70 4418.00 11.26
10/31/2015 6.50 4418.70 4418.00 11.26
11/1/2015 6.50 4418.70 4418.00 11.26
11/1/2015 6.51 4418.80 4418.10 11.25
11/2/2015 6.51 4418.80 4418.10 11.25
11/3/2015 6.51 4418.80 4418.10 11.24
11/3/2015 6.51 4418.80 4418.10 11.23
11/4/2015 6.51 4418.80 4418.10 11.23
11/4/2015 6.51 4418.80 4418.10 11.22
11/5/2015 6.51 4418.80 4418.10 11.22
11/5/2015 6.52 4418.80 4418.10 11.21
11/6/2015 6.52 4418.80 4418.10 11.21
11/6/2015 6.52 4418.80 4418.10 11.20
11/7/2015 6.52 4418.80 4418.10 11.20
11/8/2015 6.52 4418.80 4418.10 11.19
11/8/2015 6.52 4418.80 4418.10 11.19
11/9/2015 6.52 4418.80 4418.10 11.18
11/9/2015 6.53 4418.80 4418.20 11.18
11/10/2015 6.53 4418.80 4418.20 11.17
11/10/2015 6.53 4418.80 4418.20 11.17
11/11/2015 6.53 4418.80 4418.20 11.16
11/11/2015 6.53 4418.80 4418.20 11.16
11/12/2015 6.53 4418.80 4418.20 11.15
11/13/2015 6.54 4418.90 4418.20 11.15
11/13/2015 6.54 4418.90 4418.20 11.14
11/14/2015 6.54 4418.90 4418.20 11.14
11/14/2015 6.54 4418.90 4418.20 11.13
11/15/2015 6.54 4418.90 4418.20 11.13
11/15/2015 6.54 4418.90 4418.20 11.12
11/16/2015 6.54 4418.90 4418.20 11.12
11/16/2015 6.55 4418.90 4418.20 11.11
11/17/2015 6.55 4418.90 4418.20 11.11
11/18/2015 6.55 4418.90 4418.30 11.10
11/18/2015 6.55 4418.90 4418.30 11.10
11/19/2015 6.55 4418.90 4418.30 11.09
11/19/2015 6.55 4418.90 4418.30 11.09
11/20/2015 6.56 4418.90 4418.30 11.08
11/20/2015 6.56 4418.90 4418.30 11.08
88 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
11/21/2015 6.56 4418.90 4418.30 11.07
11/21/2015 6.56 4418.90 4418.30 11.07
11/22/2015 6.56 4418.90 4418.30 11.06
11/23/2015 6.56 4418.90 4418.30 11.06
11/23/2015 6.56 4418.90 4418.30 11.05
11/24/2015 6.57 4419.00 4418.30 11.05
11/24/2015 6.57 4419.00 4418.30 11.04
11/25/2015 6.57 4419.00 4418.30 11.04
11/25/2015 6.57 4419.00 4418.30 11.03
11/26/2015 6.57 4419.00 4418.40 11.03
11/26/2015 6.57 4419.00 4418.40 11.02
11/27/2015 6.58 4419.00 4418.40 11.02
11/28/2015 6.58 4419.00 4418.40 11.01
11/28/2015 6.58 4419.00 4418.40 11.01
11/29/2015 6.58 4419.00 4418.40 11.00
11/29/2015 6.58 4419.00 4418.40 11.00
11/30/2015 6.58 4419.00 4418.40 10.99
11/30/2015 6.58 4419.00 4418.40 10.99
12/1/2015 6.59 4419.00 4418.40 10.98
12/1/2015 6.59 4419.00 4418.40 10.97
12/2/2015 6.59 4419.00 4418.40 10.97
12/3/2015 6.59 4419.00 4418.40 10.96
12/3/2015 6.59 4419.00 4418.40 10.95
12/4/2015 6.59 4419.10 4418.40 10.94
12/4/2015 6.59 4419.10 4418.50 10.94
12/5/2015 6.60 4419.10 4418.50 10.93
12/5/2015 6.60 4419.10 4418.50 10.92
12/6/2015 6.60 4419.10 4418.50 10.91
12/6/2015 6.60 4419.10 4418.50 10.91
12/7/2015 6.60 4419.10 4418.50 10.90
12/8/2015 6.60 4419.10 4418.50 10.89
12/8/2015 6.61 4419.10 4418.50 10.88
12/9/2015 6.61 4419.10 4418.50 10.88
12/9/2015 6.61 4419.10 4418.50 10.87
12/10/2015 6.61 4419.10 4418.50 10.86
12/10/2015 6.61 4419.10 4418.50 10.85
12/11/2015 6.61 4419.20 4418.50 10.85
12/11/2015 6.61 4419.20 4418.50 10.84
12/12/2015 6.62 4419.20 4418.60 10.83
12/13/2015 6.62 4419.20 4418.60 10.82
12/13/2015 6.62 4419.20 4418.60 10.82
12/14/2015 6.62 4419.20 4418.60 10.81
12/14/2015 6.62 4419.20 4418.60 10.80
12/15/2015 6.62 4419.20 4418.60 10.79
12/15/2015 6.63 4419.20 4418.60 10.79
12/16/2015 6.63 4419.20 4418.60 10.78
12/16/2015 6.63 4419.20 4418.60 10.77
12/17/2015 6.63 4419.20 4418.60 10.76
12/18/2015 6.63 4419.20 4418.60 10.76
89 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
12/18/2015 6.63 4419.30 4418.60 10.75
12/19/2015 6.63 4419.30 4418.60 10.74
12/19/2015 6.64 4419.30 4418.60 10.73
12/20/2015 6.64 4419.30 4418.60 10.73
12/20/2015 6.64 4419.30 4418.70 10.72
12/21/2015 6.64 4419.30 4418.70 10.71
12/21/2015 6.64 4419.30 4418.70 10.71
12/22/2015 6.64 4419.30 4418.70 10.70
12/23/2015 6.65 4419.30 4418.70 10.69
12/23/2015 6.65 4419.30 4418.70 10.68
12/24/2015 6.65 4419.30 4418.70 10.68
12/24/2015 6.65 4419.30 4418.70 10.67
12/25/2015 6.65 4419.30 4418.70 10.66
12/25/2015 6.65 4419.30 4418.70 10.65
12/26/2015 6.65 4419.40 4418.70 10.65
12/26/2015 6.66 4419.40 4418.70 10.64
12/27/2015 6.66 4419.40 4418.70 10.63
12/28/2015 6.66 4419.40 4418.70 10.62
12/28/2015 6.66 4419.40 4418.70 10.62
12/29/2015 6.66 4419.40 4418.80 10.61
12/29/2015 6.66 4419.40 4418.80 10.60
12/30/2015 6.66 4419.40 4418.80 10.59
12/30/2015 6.67 4419.40 4418.80 10.59
12/31/2015 6.67 4419.40 4418.80 10.58
12/31/2015 6.67 4419.40 4418.80 10.57
1/1/2016 6.67 4419.40 4418.80 10.56
1/2/2016 6.67 4419.40 4418.80 10.56
1/2/2016 6.67 4419.50 4418.80 10.55
1/3/2016 6.68 4419.50 4418.80 10.54
1/3/2016 6.68 4419.50 4418.80 10.53
1/4/2016 6.68 4419.50 4418.80 10.52
1/4/2016 6.68 4419.50 4418.80 10.51
1/5/2016 6.68 4419.50 4418.80 10.50
1/5/2016 6.68 4419.50 4418.80 10.49
1/6/2016 6.68 4419.50 4418.90 10.49
1/7/2016 6.69 4419.50 4418.90 10.48
1/7/2016 6.69 4419.50 4418.90 10.47
1/8/2016 6.69 4419.50 4418.90 10.46
1/8/2016 6.69 4419.50 4418.90 10.45
1/9/2016 6.69 4419.60 4418.90 10.44
1/9/2016 6.69 4419.60 4418.90 10.43
1/10/2016 6.70 4419.60 4418.90 10.43
1/10/2016 6.70 4419.60 4418.90 10.42
1/11/2016 6.70 4419.60 4418.90 10.41
1/12/2016 6.70 4419.60 4418.90 10.40
1/12/2016 6.70 4419.60 4418.90 10.39
1/13/2016 6.70 4419.60 4418.90 10.38
1/13/2016 6.70 4419.60 4418.90 10.37
1/14/2016 6.71 4419.60 4419.00 10.37
90 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
1/14/2016 6.71 4419.60 4419.00 10.36
1/15/2016 6.71 4419.70 4419.00 10.35
1/15/2016 6.71 4419.70 4419.00 10.34
1/16/2016 6.71 4419.70 4419.00 10.33
1/17/2016 6.71 4419.70 4419.00 10.32
1/17/2016 6.71 4419.70 4419.00 10.31
1/18/2016 6.72 4419.70 4419.00 10.31
1/18/2016 6.72 4419.70 4419.00 10.30
1/19/2016 6.72 4419.70 4419.00 10.29
1/19/2016 6.72 4419.70 4419.00 10.28
1/20/2016 6.72 4419.70 4419.00 10.27
1/20/2016 6.72 4419.70 4419.00 10.26
1/21/2016 6.73 4419.70 4419.00 10.25
1/22/2016 6.73 4419.80 4419.00 10.25
1/22/2016 6.73 4419.80 4419.10 10.24
1/23/2016 6.73 4419.80 4419.10 10.23
1/23/2016 6.73 4419.80 4419.10 10.22
1/24/2016 6.73 4419.80 4419.10 10.21
1/24/2016 6.73 4419.80 4419.10 10.20
1/25/2016 6.74 4419.80 4419.10 10.19
1/25/2016 6.74 4419.80 4419.10 10.19
1/26/2016 6.74 4419.80 4419.10 10.18
1/27/2016 6.74 4419.80 4419.10 10.17
1/27/2016 6.74 4419.80 4419.10 10.16
1/28/2016 6.74 4419.80 4419.10 10.15
1/28/2016 6.75 4419.90 4419.10 10.14
1/29/2016 6.75 4419.90 4419.10 10.13
1/29/2016 6.75 4419.90 4419.10 10.13
1/30/2016 6.75 4419.90 4419.10 10.12
1/30/2016 6.75 4419.90 4419.20 10.11
1/31/2016 6.75 4419.90 4419.20 10.10
2/1/2016 6.75 4419.90 4419.20 10.09
2/1/2016 6.76 4419.90 4419.20 10.08
2/2/2016 6.76 4419.90 4419.20 10.07
2/2/2016 6.76 4419.90 4419.20 10.06
2/3/2016 6.76 4419.90 4419.20 10.06
2/3/2016 6.76 4420.00 4419.20 10.05
2/4/2016 6.76 4420.00 4419.20 10.04
2/4/2016 6.77 4420.00 4419.20 10.03
2/5/2016 6.77 4420.00 4419.20 10.02
2/6/2016 6.77 4420.00 4419.20 10.01
2/6/2016 6.77 4420.00 4419.20 10.00
2/7/2016 6.77 4420.00 4419.20 9.99
2/7/2016 6.77 4420.00 4419.20 9.99
2/8/2016 6.77 4420.00 4419.30 9.98
2/8/2016 6.78 4420.00 4419.30 9.97
2/9/2016 6.78 4420.00 4419.30 9.96
2/10/2016 6.78 4420.10 4419.30 9.95
2/11/2016 6.78 4420.10 4419.30 9.94
91 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
2/11/2016 6.78 4420.10 4419.30 9.93
2/12/2016 6.78 4420.10 4419.30 9.92
2/12/2016 6.79 4420.10 4419.30 9.91
2/13/2016 6.79 4420.10 4419.30 9.91
2/13/2016 6.79 4420.10 4419.30 9.90
2/14/2016 6.79 4420.10 4419.30 9.89
2/14/2016 6.79 4420.10 4419.30 9.88
2/15/2016 6.79 4420.10 4419.30 9.87
2/16/2016 6.80 4420.10 4419.30 9.87
2/16/2016 6.80 4420.10 4419.40 9.86
2/17/2016 6.80 4420.10 4419.40 9.85
2/17/2016 6.80 4420.20 4419.40 9.84
2/18/2016 6.80 4420.20 4419.40 9.83
2/18/2016 6.80 4420.20 4419.40 9.83
2/19/2016 6.80 4420.20 4419.40 9.82
2/19/2016 6.81 4420.20 4419.40 9.81
2/20/2016 6.81 4420.20 4419.40 9.80
2/21/2016 6.81 4420.20 4419.40 9.79
2/21/2016 6.81 4420.20 4419.40 9.79
2/22/2016 6.81 4420.20 4419.40 9.78
2/22/2016 6.81 4420.20 4419.40 9.77
2/23/2016 6.82 4420.20 4419.40 9.76
2/23/2016 6.82 4420.20 4419.40 9.75
2/24/2016 6.82 4420.30 4419.50 9.75
2/24/2016 6.82 4420.30 4419.50 9.74
2/25/2016 6.82 4420.30 4419.50 9.73
2/26/2016 6.82 4420.30 4419.50 9.72
2/26/2016 6.82 4420.30 4419.50 9.71
2/27/2016 6.83 4420.30 4419.50 9.71
2/27/2016 6.83 4420.30 4419.50 9.70
2/28/2016 6.83 4420.30 4419.50 9.69
2/28/2016 6.83 4420.30 4419.50 9.68
2/29/2016 6.83 4420.30 4419.50 9.67
2/29/2016 6.83 4420.30 4419.50 9.67
3/1/2016 6.84 4420.30 4419.50 9.66
3/2/2016 6.84 4420.30 4419.50 9.65
3/2/2016 6.84 4420.40 4419.50 9.64
3/3/2016 6.84 4420.40 4419.50 9.63
3/3/2016 6.84 4420.40 4419.60 9.62
3/4/2016 6.84 4420.40 4419.60 9.62
3/4/2016 6.84 4420.40 4419.60 9.61
3/5/2016 6.85 4420.40 4419.60 9.60
3/5/2016 6.85 4420.40 4419.60 9.59
3/6/2016 6.85 4420.40 4419.60 9.58
3/7/2016 6.85 4420.40 4419.60 9.57
3/7/2016 6.85 4420.40 4419.60 9.57
3/8/2016 6.85 4420.40 4419.60 9.56
3/8/2016 6.85 4420.50 4419.60 9.55
3/9/2016 6.86 4420.50 4419.60 9.54
92 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
3/9/2016 6.86 4420.50 4419.60 9.53
3/10/2016 6.86 4420.50 4419.60 9.52
3/10/2016 6.86 4420.50 4419.60 9.51
3/11/2016 6.86 4420.50 4419.60 9.51
3/12/2016 6.86 4420.50 4419.70 9.50
3/12/2016 6.87 4420.50 4419.70 9.49
3/13/2016 6.87 4420.50 4419.70 9.48
3/13/2016 6.87 4420.50 4419.70 9.47
3/14/2016 6.87 4420.50 4419.70 9.46
3/14/2016 6.87 4420.50 4419.70 9.46
3/15/2016 6.87 4420.60 4419.70 9.45
3/15/2016 6.87 4420.60 4419.70 9.44
3/16/2016 6.88 4420.60 4419.70 9.43
3/17/2016 6.88 4420.60 4419.70 9.42
3/17/2016 6.88 4420.60 4419.70 9.41
3/18/2016 6.88 4420.60 4419.70 9.40
3/18/2016 6.88 4420.60 4419.70 9.40
3/19/2016 6.88 4420.60 4419.70 9.39
3/19/2016 6.89 4420.60 4419.70 9.38
3/20/2016 6.89 4420.60 4419.80 9.37
3/20/2016 6.89 4420.60 4419.80 9.36
3/21/2016 6.89 4420.60 4419.80 9.35
3/22/2016 6.89 4420.70 4419.80 9.35
3/22/2016 6.89 4420.70 4419.80 9.34
3/23/2016 6.89 4420.70 4419.80 9.33
3/23/2016 6.90 4420.70 4419.80 9.32
3/24/2016 6.90 4420.70 4419.80 9.31
3/24/2016 6.90 4420.70 4419.80 9.30
3/25/2016 6.90 4420.70 4419.80 9.29
3/25/2016 6.90 4420.70 4419.80 9.29
3/26/2016 6.90 4420.70 4419.80 9.28
3/27/2016 6.91 4420.70 4419.80 9.27
3/27/2016 6.91 4420.70 4419.80 9.26
3/28/2016 6.91 4420.70 4419.90 9.25
3/28/2016 6.91 4420.80 4419.90 9.24
3/29/2016 6.91 4420.80 4419.90 9.24
3/29/2016 6.91 4420.80 4419.90 9.23
3/30/2016 6.91 4420.80 4419.90 9.22
3/30/2016 6.92 4420.80 4419.90 9.21
3/31/2016 6.92 4420.80 4419.90 9.20
4/1/2016 6.92 4420.80 4419.90 9.19
4/1/2016 6.92 4420.80 4419.90 9.19
4/2/2016 6.92 4420.80 4419.90 9.18
4/2/2016 6.92 4420.80 4419.90 9.17
4/3/2016 6.92 4420.80 4419.90 9.17
4/3/2016 6.93 4420.80 4419.90 9.16
4/4/2016 6.93 4420.80 4419.90 9.15
4/4/2016 6.93 4420.90 4419.90 9.15
4/5/2016 6.93 4420.90 4420.00 9.14
93 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
4/6/2016 6.93 4420.90 4420.00 9.13
4/6/2016 6.93 4420.90 4420.00 9.12
4/7/2016 6.94 4420.90 4420.00 9.12
4/7/2016 6.94 4420.90 4420.00 9.11
4/8/2016 6.94 4420.90 4420.00 9.10
4/8/2016 6.94 4420.90 4420.00 9.10
4/9/2016 6.94 4420.90 4420.00 9.09
4/9/2016 6.94 4420.90 4420.00 9.08
4/10/2016 6.94 4420.90 4420.00 9.08
4/11/2016 6.95 4420.90 4420.00 9.07
4/11/2016 6.95 4420.90 4420.00 9.06
4/12/2016 6.95 4420.90 4420.00 9.06
4/12/2016 6.95 4421.00 4420.00 9.05
4/13/2016 6.95 4421.00 4420.00 9.04
4/13/2016 6.95 4421.00 4420.00 9.04
4/14/2016 6.96 4421.00 4420.10 9.03
4/14/2016 6.96 4421.00 4420.10 9.02
4/15/2016 6.96 4421.00 4420.10 9.02
4/16/2016 6.96 4421.00 4420.10 9.01
4/16/2016 6.96 4421.00 4420.10 9.00
4/17/2016 6.96 4421.00 4420.10 9.00
4/17/2016 6.96 4421.00 4420.10 8.99
4/18/2016 6.97 4421.00 4420.10 8.98
4/18/2016 6.97 4421.00 4420.10 8.97
4/19/2016 6.97 4421.00 4420.10 8.97
4/19/2016 6.97 4421.00 4420.10 8.96
4/20/2016 6.97 4421.00 4420.10 8.95
4/21/2016 6.97 4421.10 4420.10 8.95
4/21/2016 6.98 4421.10 4420.10 8.94
4/22/2016 6.98 4421.10 4420.10 8.93
4/22/2016 6.98 4421.10 4420.10 8.93
4/23/2016 6.98 4421.10 4420.20 8.92
4/23/2016 6.98 4421.10 4420.20 8.91
4/24/2016 6.98 4421.10 4420.20 8.91
4/24/2016 6.98 4421.10 4420.20 8.90
4/25/2016 6.99 4421.10 4420.20 8.89
4/26/2016 6.99 4421.10 4420.20 8.89
4/26/2016 6.99 4421.10 4420.20 8.88
4/27/2016 6.99 4421.10 4420.20 8.87
4/27/2016 6.99 4421.10 4420.20 8.87
4/28/2016 6.99 4421.10 4420.20 8.86
4/28/2016 6.99 4421.10 4420.20 8.85
4/29/2016 7.00 4421.20 4420.20 8.85
4/29/2016 7.00 4421.20 4420.20 8.84
4/30/2016 7.00 4421.20 4420.20 8.83
5/1/2016 7.00 4421.20 4420.20 8.82
5/1/2016 7.00 4421.20 4420.20 8.82
5/2/2016 7.00 4421.20 4420.30 8.81
5/2/2016 7.01 4421.20 4420.30 8.81
94 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
5/3/2016 7.01 4421.20 4420.30 8.80
5/3/2016 7.01 4421.20 4420.30 8.79
5/4/2016 7.01 4421.20 4420.30 8.79
5/4/2016 7.01 4421.20 4420.30 8.78
5/5/2016 7.01 4421.20 4420.30 8.78
5/6/2016 7.01 4421.20 4420.30 8.77
5/6/2016 7.02 4421.20 4420.30 8.76
5/7/2016 7.02 4421.20 4420.30 8.76
5/7/2016 7.02 4421.20 4420.30 8.75
5/8/2016 7.02 4421.30 4420.30 8.74
5/8/2016 7.02 4421.30 4420.30 8.74
5/9/2016 7.02 4421.30 4420.30 8.73
5/9/2016 7.03 4421.30 4420.30 8.73
5/10/2016 7.03 4421.30 4420.30 8.72
5/11/2016 7.03 4421.30 4420.40 8.71
5/11/2016 7.03 4421.30 4420.40 8.71
5/12/2016 7.03 4421.30 4420.40 8.70
5/12/2016 7.03 4421.30 4420.40 8.69
5/13/2016 7.03 4421.30 4420.40 8.69
5/13/2016 7.04 4421.30 4420.40 8.68
5/14/2016 7.04 4421.30 4420.40 8.68
5/14/2016 7.04 4421.30 4420.40 8.67
5/15/2016 7.04 4421.30 4420.40 8.66
5/16/2016 7.04 4421.30 4420.40 8.66
5/16/2016 7.04 4421.30 4420.40 8.65
5/17/2016 7.05 4421.40 4420.40 8.64
5/17/2016 7.05 4421.40 4420.40 8.64
5/18/2016 7.05 4421.40 4420.40 8.63
5/18/2016 7.05 4421.40 4420.40 8.63
5/19/2016 7.05 4421.40 4420.40 8.62
5/19/2016 7.05 4421.40 4420.40 8.61
5/20/2016 7.05 4421.40 4420.50 8.61
5/21/2016 7.06 4421.40 4420.50 8.60
5/21/2016 7.06 4421.40 4420.50 8.59
5/22/2016 7.06 4421.40 4420.50 8.59
5/22/2016 7.06 4421.40 4420.50 8.58
5/23/2016 7.06 4421.40 4420.50 8.58
5/23/2016 7.06 4421.40 4420.50 8.57
5/24/2016 7.06 4421.40 4420.50 8.56
5/24/2016 7.07 4421.40 4420.50 8.56
5/25/2016 7.07 4421.40 4420.50 8.55
5/26/2016 7.07 4421.50 4420.50 8.54
5/26/2016 7.07 4421.50 4420.50 8.54
5/27/2016 7.07 4421.50 4420.50 8.53
5/27/2016 7.07 4421.50 4420.50 8.53
5/28/2016 7.08 4421.50 4420.50 8.52
5/28/2016 7.08 4421.50 4420.50 8.51
5/29/2016 7.08 4421.50 4420.60 8.51
5/29/2016 7.08 4421.50 4420.60 8.50
95 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
5/30/2016 7.08 4421.50 4420.60 8.50
5/31/2016 7.08 4421.50 4420.60 8.49
5/31/2016 7.08 4421.50 4420.60 8.48
6/1/2016 7.09 4421.50 4420.60 8.48
6/1/2016 7.09 4421.50 4420.60 8.47
6/2/2016 7.09 4421.50 4420.60 8.47
6/2/2016 7.09 4421.50 4420.60 8.46
6/3/2016 7.09 4421.50 4420.60 8.46
6/3/2016 7.09 4421.50 4420.60 8.45
6/4/2016 7.10 4421.50 4420.60 8.45
6/5/2016 7.10 4421.60 4420.60 8.45
6/5/2016 7.10 4421.60 4420.60 8.44
6/6/2016 7.10 4421.60 4420.60 8.44
6/6/2016 7.10 4421.60 4420.60 8.43
6/7/2016 7.10 4421.60 4420.70 8.43
6/7/2016 7.10 4421.60 4420.70 8.42
6/8/2016 7.11 4421.60 4420.70 8.42
6/8/2016 7.11 4421.60 4420.70 8.42
6/9/2016 7.11 4421.60 4420.70 8.41
6/10/2016 7.11 4421.60 4420.70 8.41
6/10/2016 7.11 4421.60 4420.70 8.40
6/11/2016 7.11 4421.60 4420.70 8.40
6/11/2016 7.11 4421.60 4420.70 8.39
6/12/2016 7.12 4421.60 4420.70 8.39
6/12/2016 7.12 4421.60 4420.70 8.39
6/13/2016 7.12 4421.60 4420.70 8.38
6/13/2016 7.12 4421.60 4420.70 8.38
6/14/2016 7.12 4421.60 4420.70 8.37
6/15/2016 7.12 4421.60 4420.70 8.37
6/15/2016 7.13 4421.60 4420.70 8.36
6/16/2016 7.13 4421.60 4420.80 8.36
6/16/2016 7.13 4421.60 4420.80 8.36
6/17/2016 7.13 4421.60 4420.80 8.35
6/17/2016 7.13 4421.70 4420.80 8.35
6/18/2016 7.13 4421.70 4420.80 8.34
6/18/2016 7.13 4421.70 4420.80 8.34
6/19/2016 7.14 4421.70 4420.80 8.33
6/20/2016 7.14 4421.70 4420.80 8.33
6/20/2016 7.14 4421.70 4420.80 8.33
6/21/2016 7.14 4421.70 4420.80 8.32
6/21/2016 7.14 4421.70 4420.80 8.32
6/22/2016 7.14 4421.70 4420.80 8.31
6/22/2016 7.15 4421.70 4420.80 8.31
6/23/2016 7.15 4421.70 4420.80 8.30
6/23/2016 7.15 4421.70 4420.80 8.30
6/24/2016 7.15 4421.70 4420.80 8.30
6/25/2016 7.15 4421.70 4420.80 8.29
6/25/2016 7.15 4421.70 4420.90 8.29
6/26/2016 7.15 4421.70 4420.90 8.28
96 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
6/26/2016 7.16 4421.70 4420.90 8.28
6/27/2016 7.16 4421.70 4420.90 8.27
6/27/2016 7.16 4421.70 4420.90 8.27
6/28/2016 7.16 4421.70 4420.90 8.27
6/28/2016 7.16 4421.70 4420.90 8.26
6/29/2016 7.16 4421.70 4420.90 8.26
6/30/2016 7.17 4421.70 4420.90 8.25
6/30/2016 7.17 4421.80 4420.90 8.25
7/1/2016 7.17 4421.80 4420.90 8.25
7/1/2016 7.17 4421.80 4420.90 8.24
7/2/2016 7.17 4421.80 4420.90 8.24
7/2/2016 7.17 4421.80 4420.90 8.24
7/3/2016 7.17 4421.80 4420.90 8.24
7/3/2016 7.18 4421.80 4420.90 8.24
7/4/2016 7.18 4421.80 4421.00 8.24
7/5/2016 7.18 4421.80 4421.00 8.24
7/5/2016 7.18 4421.80 4421.00 8.24
7/6/2016 7.18 4421.80 4421.00 8.24
7/6/2016 7.18 4421.80 4421.00 8.24
7/7/2016 7.18 4421.80 4421.00 8.24
7/7/2016 7.19 4421.80 4421.00 8.24
7/8/2016 7.19 4421.80 4421.00 8.24
7/8/2016 7.19 4421.80 4421.00 8.24
7/9/2016 7.19 4421.80 4421.00 8.24
7/10/2016 7.19 4421.80 4421.00 8.24
7/10/2016 7.19 4421.80 4421.00 8.24
7/11/2016 7.20 4421.80 4421.00 8.24
7/11/2016 7.20 4421.80 4421.00 8.24
7/12/2016 7.20 4421.80 4421.00 8.24
7/12/2016 7.20 4421.80 4421.00 8.24
7/13/2016 7.20 4421.80 4421.10 8.24
7/13/2016 7.20 4421.80 4421.10 8.23
7/14/2016 7.20 4421.80 4421.10 8.23
7/15/2016 7.21 4421.80 4421.10 8.23
7/15/2016 7.21 4421.80 4421.10 8.23
7/16/2016 7.21 4421.80 4421.10 8.23
7/16/2016 7.21 4421.80 4421.10 8.23
7/17/2016 7.21 4421.80 4421.10 8.23
7/17/2016 7.21 4421.80 4421.10 8.23
7/18/2016 7.22 4421.80 4421.10 8.23
7/18/2016 7.22 4421.80 4421.10 8.23
7/19/2016 7.22 4421.80 4421.10 8.23
7/20/2016 7.22 4421.80 4421.10 8.23
7/20/2016 7.22 4421.80 4421.10 8.23
7/21/2016 7.22 4421.80 4421.10 8.23
7/21/2016 7.22 4421.80 4421.10 8.23
7/22/2016 7.23 4421.80 4421.20 8.23
7/22/2016 7.23 4421.80 4421.20 8.23
7/23/2016 7.23 4421.80 4421.20 8.23
97 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
7/23/2016 7.23 4421.80 4421.20 8.23
7/24/2016 7.23 4421.80 4421.20 8.23
7/25/2016 7.23 4421.80 4421.20 8.23
7/25/2016 7.24 4421.80 4421.20 8.23
7/26/2016 7.24 4421.80 4421.20 8.23
7/26/2016 7.24 4421.80 4421.20 8.22
7/27/2016 7.24 4421.80 4421.20 8.22
7/27/2016 7.24 4421.80 4421.20 8.22
7/28/2016 7.24 4421.80 4421.20 8.22
7/28/2016 7.24 4421.80 4421.20 8.22
7/29/2016 7.25 4421.80 4421.20 8.22
7/30/2016 7.25 4421.80 4421.20 8.22
7/30/2016 7.25 4421.80 4421.20 8.22
7/31/2016 7.25 4421.80 4421.30 8.22
7/31/2016 7.25 4421.80 4421.30 8.22
8/1/2016 7.25 4421.80 4421.30 8.22
8/1/2016 7.25 4421.80 4421.30 8.22
8/2/2016 7.26 4421.80 4421.30 8.22
8/2/2016 7.26 4421.80 4421.30 8.22
8/3/2016 7.26 4421.80 4421.30 8.22
8/4/2016 7.26 4421.80 4421.30 8.22
8/4/2016 7.26 4421.80 4421.30 8.22
8/5/2016 7.26 4421.80 4421.30 8.22
8/5/2016 7.27 4421.80 4421.30 8.22
8/6/2016 7.27 4421.80 4421.30 8.22
8/6/2016 7.27 4421.80 4421.30 8.22
8/7/2016 7.27 4421.80 4421.30 8.22
8/7/2016 7.27 4421.80 4421.30 8.22
8/8/2016 7.27 4421.80 4421.30 8.22
8/9/2016 7.27 4421.80 4421.30 8.22
8/9/2016 7.28 4421.80 4421.40 8.22
8/10/2016 7.28 4421.80 4421.40 8.22
8/10/2016 7.28 4421.80 4421.40 8.22
8/11/2016 7.28 4421.80 4421.40 8.22
8/11/2016 7.28 4421.80 4421.40 8.21
8/12/2016 7.28 4421.80 4421.40 8.21
8/12/2016 7.29 4421.80 4421.40 8.21
8/13/2016 7.29 4421.80 4421.40 8.21
8/14/2016 7.29 4421.80 4421.40 8.21
8/14/2016 7.29 4421.80 4421.40 8.21
8/15/2016 7.29 4421.80 4421.40 8.21
8/15/2016 7.29 4421.80 4421.40 8.21
8/16/2016 7.29 4421.80 4421.40 8.21
8/16/2016 7.30 4421.80 4421.40 8.21
8/17/2016 7.30 4421.80 4421.40 8.21
8/17/2016 7.30 4421.80 4421.40 8.21
8/18/2016 7.30 4421.80 4421.50 8.21
8/19/2016 7.30 4421.80 4421.50 8.21
8/19/2016 7.30 4421.80 4421.50 8.21
98 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
8/20/2016 7.31 4421.80 4421.50 8.21
8/20/2016 7.31 4421.80 4421.50 8.21
8/21/2016 7.31 4421.80 4421.50 8.21
8/21/2016 7.31 4421.80 4421.50 8.21
8/22/2016 7.31 4421.80 4421.50 8.21
8/22/2016 7.31 4421.80 4421.50 8.21
8/23/2016 7.31 4421.80 4421.50 8.21
8/24/2016 7.32 4421.80 4421.50 8.21
8/24/2016 7.32 4421.80 4421.50 8.21
8/25/2016 7.32 4421.80 4421.50 8.21
8/25/2016 7.32 4421.80 4421.50 8.21
8/26/2016 7.32 4421.80 4421.50 8.21
8/26/2016 7.32 4421.80 4421.50 8.21
8/27/2016 7.32 4421.80 4421.60 8.21
8/27/2016 7.33 4421.80 4421.60 8.21
8/28/2016 7.33 4421.80 4421.60 8.21
8/29/2016 7.33 4421.80 4421.60 8.21
8/29/2016 7.33 4421.80 4421.60 8.21
8/30/2016 7.33 4421.80 4421.60 8.21
8/30/2016 7.33 4421.80 4421.60 8.20
8/31/2016 7.34 4421.80 4421.60 8.20
8/31/2016 7.34 4421.80 4421.60 8.20
9/1/2016 7.34 4421.80 4421.60 8.20
9/1/2016 7.34 4421.80 4421.60 8.20
9/2/2016 7.34 4421.80 4421.60 8.20
9/3/2016 7.34 4421.80 4421.60 8.20
9/3/2016 7.34 4421.80 4421.60 8.20
9/4/2016 7.35 4421.80 4421.60 8.20
9/4/2016 7.35 4421.80 4421.60 8.20
9/5/2016 7.35 4421.80 4421.70 8.20
9/5/2016 7.35 4421.80 4421.70 8.20
9/6/2016 7.35 4421.80 4421.70 8.20
9/6/2016 7.35 4421.80 4421.70 8.20
9/7/2016 7.36 4421.80 4421.70 8.20
9/8/2016 7.36 4421.80 4421.70 8.20
9/8/2016 7.36 4421.80 4421.70 8.20
9/9/2016 7.36 4421.80 4421.70 8.20
9/9/2016 7.36 4421.80 4421.70 8.20
9/10/2016 7.36 4421.80 4421.70 8.20
9/10/2016 7.36 4421.80 4421.70 8.20
9/11/2016 7.37 4421.80 4421.70 8.20
9/11/2016 7.37 4421.80 4421.70 8.20
9/12/2016 7.37 4421.80 4421.70 8.20
9/13/2016 7.37 4421.80 4421.70 8.20
9/13/2016 7.37 4421.80 4421.70 8.20
9/14/2016 7.37 4421.80 4421.70 8.19
9/14/2016 7.38 4421.80 4421.80 8.19
9/15/2016 7.38 4421.80 4421.80 8.19
9/15/2016 7.38 4421.80 4421.80 8.19
99 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
9/16/2016 7.38 4421.80 4421.80 8.19
9/16/2016 7.38 4421.80 4421.80 8.19
9/17/2016 7.38 4421.80 4421.80 8.19
9/18/2016 7.38 4421.80 4421.80 8.19
9/18/2016 7.39 4421.80 4421.80 8.19
9/19/2016 7.39 4421.80 4421.80 8.19
9/19/2016 7.39 4421.80 4421.80 8.19
9/20/2016 7.39 4421.80 4421.80 8.18
9/20/2016 7.39 4421.80 4421.80 8.18
9/21/2016 7.39 4421.80 4421.80 8.17
9/21/2016 7.39 4421.80 4421.80 8.17
9/22/2016 7.40 4421.80 4421.80 8.16
9/23/2016 7.40 4421.80 4421.80 8.15
9/23/2016 7.40 4421.90 4421.90 8.15
9/24/2016 7.40 4421.90 4421.90 8.14
9/24/2016 7.40 4421.90 4421.90 8.13
9/25/2016 7.40 4421.90 4421.90 8.13
9/25/2016 7.41 4421.90 4421.90 8.12
9/26/2016 7.41 4421.90 4421.90 8.12
9/26/2016 7.41 4421.90 4421.90 8.11
9/27/2016 7.41 4421.90 4421.90 8.10
9/28/2016 7.41 4421.90 4421.90 8.10
9/28/2016 7.41 4421.90 4421.90 8.09
9/29/2016 7.41 4421.90 4421.90 8.08
9/29/2016 7.42 4421.90 4421.90 8.08
9/30/2016 7.42 4421.90 4421.90 8.07
9/30/2016 7.42 4421.90 4421.90 8.07
10/1/2016 7.42 4421.90 4421.90 8.06
10/1/2016 7.42 4421.90 4421.90 8.05
10/2/2016 7.42 4422.00 4422.00 8.05
10/3/2016 7.43 4422.00 4422.00 8.04
10/3/2016 7.43 4422.00 4422.00 8.04
10/4/2016 7.43 4422.00 4422.00 8.03
10/4/2016 7.43 4422.00 4422.00 8.02
10/5/2016 7.43 4422.00 4422.00 8.02
10/5/2016 7.43 4422.00 4422.00 8.01
10/6/2016 7.43 4422.00 4422.00 8.00
10/6/2016 7.44 4422.00 4422.00 8.00
10/7/2016 7.44 4422.00 4422.00 7.99
10/8/2016 7.44 4422.00 4422.00 7.99
10/8/2016 7.44 4422.00 4422.00 7.98
10/9/2016 7.44 4422.00 4422.00 7.97
10/9/2016 7.44 4422.00 4422.00 7.97
10/10/2016 7.45 4422.00 4422.00 7.96
10/10/2016 7.45 4422.00 4422.00 7.96
10/11/2016 7.45 4422.10 4422.10 7.95
10/11/2016 7.45 4422.10 4422.10 7.94
10/12/2016 7.45 4422.10 4422.10 7.94
10/13/2016 7.45 4422.10 4422.10 7.93
100 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
10/13/2016 7.45 4422.10 4422.10 7.92
10/14/2016 7.46 4422.10 4422.10 7.92
10/14/2016 7.46 4422.10 4422.10 7.91
10/15/2016 7.46 4422.10 4422.10 7.91
10/15/2016 7.46 4422.10 4422.10 7.90
10/16/2016 7.46 4422.10 4422.10 7.89
10/16/2016 7.46 4422.10 4422.10 7.89
10/17/2016 7.46 4422.10 4422.10 7.88
10/18/2016 7.47 4422.10 4422.10 7.88
10/18/2016 7.47 4422.10 4422.10 7.87
10/19/2016 7.47 4422.10 4422.10 7.86
10/19/2016 7.47 4422.10 4422.10 7.86
10/20/2016 7.47 4422.10 4422.10 7.85
10/20/2016 7.47 4422.20 4422.20 7.84
10/21/2016 7.48 4422.20 4422.20 7.84
10/21/2016 7.48 4422.20 4422.20 7.83
10/22/2016 7.48 4422.20 4422.20 7.83
10/23/2016 7.48 4422.20 4422.20 7.82
10/23/2016 7.48 4422.20 4422.20 7.81
10/24/2016 7.48 4422.20 4422.20 7.81
10/24/2016 7.48 4422.20 4422.20 7.80
10/25/2016 7.49 4422.20 4422.20 7.80
10/25/2016 7.49 4422.20 4422.20 7.79
10/26/2016 7.49 4422.20 4422.20 7.78
10/26/2016 7.49 4422.20 4422.20 7.78
10/27/2016 7.49 4422.20 4422.20 7.77
10/28/2016 7.49 4422.20 4422.20 7.76
10/28/2016 7.50 4422.20 4422.20 7.76
10/29/2016 7.50 4422.20 4422.20 7.75
10/29/2016 7.50 4422.30 4422.30 7.75
10/30/2016 7.50 4422.30 4422.30 7.74
10/30/2016 7.50 4422.30 4422.30 7.73
10/31/2016 7.50 4422.30 4422.30 7.73
10/31/2016 7.50 4422.30 4422.30 7.72
11/1/2016 7.51 4422.30 4422.30 7.72
11/2/2016 7.51 4422.30 4422.30 7.71
11/2/2016 7.51 4422.30 4422.30 7.70
11/3/2016 7.51 4422.30 4422.30 7.70
11/3/2016 7.51 4422.30 4422.30 7.69
11/4/2016 7.51 4422.30 4422.30 7.68
11/4/2016 7.51 4422.30 4422.30 7.68
11/5/2016 7.52 4422.30 4422.30 7.67
11/5/2016 7.52 4422.30 4422.30 7.67
11/6/2016 7.52 4422.30 4422.30 7.66
11/7/2016 7.52 4422.30 4422.30 7.65
11/7/2016 7.52 4422.40 4422.40 7.65
11/8/2016 7.52 4422.40 4422.40 7.64
11/8/2016 7.53 4422.40 4422.40 7.64
11/9/2016 7.53 4422.40 4422.40 7.63
101 of 102
Table 1A Tailings and Pond Elevations for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
500 tons/day
Date
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tailings Pool
Elevation South [ft]
Tailings Elevation
South [ft] Freeboard [ft]
11/9/2016 7.53 4422.40 4422.40 7.62
11/10/2016 7.53 4422.40 4422.40 7.62
11/10/2016 7.53 4422.40 4422.40 7.61
11/11/2016 7.53 4422.40 4422.40 7.60
11/12/2016 7.53 4422.40 4422.40 7.60
11/12/2016 7.54 4422.40 4422.40 7.59
11/13/2016 7.54 4422.40 4422.40 7.59
11/13/2016 7.54 4422.40 4422.40 7.58
11/14/2016 7.54 4422.40 4422.40 7.57
11/14/2016 7.54 4422.40 4422.40 7.57
11/15/2016 7.54 4422.40 4422.40 7.56
11/15/2016 7.55 4422.40 4422.40 7.56
11/16/2016 7.55 4422.50 4422.50 7.55
11/17/2016 7.55 4422.50 4422.50 7.54
11/17/2016 7.55 4422.50 4422.50 7.54
11/18/2016 7.55 4422.50 4422.50 7.53
11/18/2016 7.55 4422.50 4422.50 7.52
11/19/2016 7.55 4422.50 4422.50 7.52
11/19/2016 7.56 4422.50 4422.50 7.51
11/20/2016 7.56 4422.50 4422.50 7.51
11/20/2016 7.56 4422.50 4422.50 7.50
102 of 102
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
5/1/2009 0.00 4362.00 4362.00 68.00
5/1/2009 0.00 4363.20 4363.00 66.84
5/2/2009 0.00 4363.60 4363.30 66.41
5/2/2009 0.00 4364.10 4363.70 65.87
5/3/2009 0.01 4364.70 4364.20 65.32
5/3/2009 0.01 4365.20 4364.60 64.78
5/4/2009 0.01 4365.80 4365.00 64.24
5/4/2009 0.01 4366.30 4365.40 63.69
5/5/2009 0.01 4366.80 4365.80 63.15
5/5/2009 0.01 4367.40 4366.20 62.61
5/6/2009 0.02 4367.90 4366.70 62.07
5/7/2009 0.02 4368.50 4367.10 61.53
5/7/2009 0.02 4369.00 4367.50 61.00
5/8/2009 0.02 4369.50 4367.90 60.46
5/8/2009 0.02 4370.00 4368.30 59.98
5/9/2009 0.02 4370.20 4368.70 59.81
5/9/2009 0.02 4370.30 4369.10 59.65
5/10/2009 0.03 4370.50 4369.60 59.49
5/10/2009 0.03 4370.70 4370.00 59.33
5/11/2009 0.03 4370.80 4370.10 59.16
5/12/2009 0.03 4371.00 4370.20 59.00
5/12/2009 0.03 4371.20 4370.40 58.84
5/13/2009 0.03 4371.30 4370.50 58.68
5/13/2009 0.03 4371.50 4370.60 58.52
5/14/2009 0.04 4371.60 4370.70 58.35
5/14/2009 0.04 4371.80 4370.90 58.19
5/15/2009 0.04 4372.00 4371.00 58.03
5/15/2009 0.04 4372.10 4371.10 57.87
5/16/2009 0.04 4372.30 4371.30 57.71
5/17/2009 0.04 4372.50 4371.40 57.54
5/17/2009 0.05 4372.60 4371.50 57.38
5/18/2009 0.05 4372.80 4371.60 57.22
5/18/2009 0.05 4372.90 4371.80 57.06
5/19/2009 0.05 4373.10 4371.90 56.90
5/19/2009 0.05 4373.30 4372.00 56.74
5/20/2009 0.05 4373.40 4372.10 56.58
5/20/2009 0.05 4373.60 4372.30 56.42
5/21/2009 0.06 4373.70 4372.40 56.26
5/22/2009 0.06 4373.90 4372.50 56.10
5/22/2009 0.06 4374.10 4372.60 55.93
5/23/2009 0.06 4374.20 4372.80 55.77
5/23/2009 0.06 4374.40 4372.90 55.61
5/24/2009 0.06 4374.50 4373.00 55.45
5/24/2009 0.07 4374.70 4373.10 55.29
5/25/2009 0.07 4374.90 4373.30 55.13
5/25/2009 0.07 4375.00 4373.40 54.97
5/26/2009 0.07 4375.20 4373.50 54.81
5/27/2009 0.07 4375.30 4373.60 54.65
5/27/2009 0.07 4375.50 4373.80 54.49
5/28/2009 0.07 4375.70 4373.90 54.33
1 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
5/28/2009 0.08 4375.80 4374.00 54.17
5/29/2009 0.08 4376.00 4374.10 54.01
5/29/2009 0.08 4376.10 4374.30 53.85
5/30/2009 0.08 4376.30 4374.40 53.69
5/30/2009 0.08 4376.50 4374.50 53.54
5/31/2009 0.08 4376.60 4374.70 53.38
6/1/2009 0.09 4376.80 4374.80 53.22
6/1/2009 0.09 4376.90 4374.90 53.06
6/2/2009 0.09 4377.10 4375.00 52.90
6/2/2009 0.09 4377.30 4375.20 52.74
6/3/2009 0.09 4377.40 4375.30 52.59
6/3/2009 0.09 4377.60 4375.40 52.43
6/4/2009 0.09 4377.70 4375.50 52.27
6/4/2009 0.10 4377.90 4375.70 52.12
6/5/2009 0.10 4378.00 4375.80 51.96
6/6/2009 0.10 4378.20 4375.90 51.80
6/6/2009 0.10 4378.40 4376.00 51.65
6/7/2009 0.10 4378.50 4376.20 51.49
6/7/2009 0.10 4378.70 4376.30 51.34
6/8/2009 0.10 4378.80 4376.40 51.18
6/8/2009 0.11 4379.00 4376.50 51.02
6/9/2009 0.11 4379.10 4376.70 50.87
6/9/2009 0.11 4379.30 4376.80 50.71
6/10/2009 0.11 4379.40 4376.90 50.56
6/11/2009 0.11 4379.60 4377.00 50.40
6/11/2009 0.11 4379.80 4377.20 50.25
6/12/2009 0.12 4379.90 4377.30 50.09
6/12/2009 0.12 4380.00 4377.40 49.97
6/13/2009 0.12 4380.10 4377.50 49.89
6/13/2009 0.12 4380.20 4377.70 49.81
6/14/2009 0.12 4380.30 4377.80 49.73
6/14/2009 0.12 4380.30 4377.90 49.66
6/15/2009 0.12 4380.40 4378.10 49.58
6/16/2009 0.13 4380.50 4378.20 49.50
6/16/2009 0.13 4380.60 4378.30 49.42
6/17/2009 0.13 4380.70 4378.40 49.35
6/17/2009 0.13 4380.70 4378.60 49.27
6/18/2009 0.13 4380.80 4378.70 49.19
6/18/2009 0.13 4380.90 4378.80 49.11
6/19/2009 0.14 4381.00 4378.90 49.04
6/19/2009 0.14 4381.00 4379.10 48.96
6/20/2009 0.14 4381.10 4379.20 48.88
6/21/2009 0.14 4381.20 4379.30 48.81
6/21/2009 0.14 4381.30 4379.40 48.73
6/22/2009 0.14 4381.30 4379.60 48.65
6/22/2009 0.14 4381.40 4379.70 48.57
6/23/2009 0.15 4381.50 4379.80 48.50
6/23/2009 0.15 4381.60 4379.90 48.42
6/24/2009 0.15 4381.70 4380.00 48.34
6/24/2009 0.15 4381.70 4380.10 48.27
2 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
6/25/2009 0.15 4381.80 4380.20 48.19
6/26/2009 0.15 4381.90 4380.20 48.11
6/26/2009 0.16 4382.00 4380.30 48.03
6/27/2009 0.16 4382.00 4380.30 47.96
6/27/2009 0.16 4382.10 4380.40 47.88
6/28/2009 0.16 4382.20 4380.50 47.80
6/28/2009 0.16 4382.30 4380.50 47.73
6/29/2009 0.16 4382.30 4380.60 47.65
6/29/2009 0.16 4382.40 4380.70 47.57
6/30/2009 0.17 4382.50 4380.70 47.50
7/1/2009 0.17 4382.60 4380.80 47.44
7/1/2009 0.17 4382.60 4380.80 47.41
7/2/2009 0.17 4382.60 4380.80 47.38
7/2/2009 0.17 4382.70 4380.80 47.34
7/3/2009 0.17 4382.70 4380.90 47.31
7/3/2009 0.17 4382.70 4380.90 47.28
7/4/2009 0.18 4382.80 4380.90 47.24
7/4/2009 0.18 4382.80 4380.90 47.21
7/5/2009 0.18 4382.80 4380.90 47.18
7/6/2009 0.18 4382.90 4381.00 47.15
7/6/2009 0.18 4382.90 4381.00 47.11
7/7/2009 0.18 4382.90 4381.00 47.08
7/7/2009 0.19 4383.00 4381.00 47.05
7/8/2009 0.19 4383.00 4381.10 47.01
7/8/2009 0.19 4383.00 4381.10 46.98
7/9/2009 0.19 4383.10 4381.10 46.95
7/9/2009 0.19 4383.10 4381.10 46.92
7/10/2009 0.19 4383.10 4381.20 46.88
7/11/2009 0.19 4383.20 4381.20 46.85
7/11/2009 0.20 4383.20 4381.20 46.82
7/12/2009 0.20 4383.20 4381.20 46.78
7/12/2009 0.20 4383.20 4381.20 46.75
7/13/2009 0.20 4383.30 4381.30 46.72
7/13/2009 0.20 4383.30 4381.30 46.69
7/14/2009 0.20 4383.30 4381.30 46.65
7/14/2009 0.21 4383.40 4381.30 46.62
7/15/2009 0.21 4383.40 4381.40 46.59
7/16/2009 0.21 4383.40 4381.40 46.56
7/16/2009 0.21 4383.50 4381.40 46.52
7/17/2009 0.21 4383.50 4381.40 46.49
7/17/2009 0.21 4383.50 4381.40 46.46
7/18/2009 0.21 4383.60 4381.50 46.43
7/18/2009 0.22 4383.60 4381.50 46.39
7/19/2009 0.22 4383.60 4381.50 46.36
7/19/2009 0.22 4383.70 4381.50 46.33
7/20/2009 0.22 4383.70 4381.60 46.30
7/21/2009 0.22 4383.70 4381.60 46.26
7/21/2009 0.22 4383.80 4381.60 46.23
7/22/2009 0.23 4383.80 4381.60 46.20
7/22/2009 0.23 4383.80 4381.70 46.17
3 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
7/23/2009 0.23 4383.90 4381.70 46.13
7/23/2009 0.23 4383.90 4381.70 46.10
7/24/2009 0.23 4383.90 4381.70 46.07
7/24/2009 0.23 4384.00 4381.70 46.04
7/25/2009 0.23 4384.00 4381.80 46.00
7/26/2009 0.24 4384.00 4381.80 45.97
7/26/2009 0.24 4384.10 4381.80 45.94
7/27/2009 0.24 4384.10 4381.80 45.91
7/27/2009 0.24 4384.10 4381.90 45.88
7/28/2009 0.24 4384.20 4381.90 45.84
7/28/2009 0.24 4384.20 4381.90 45.81
7/29/2009 0.24 4384.20 4381.90 45.78
7/29/2009 0.25 4384.30 4382.00 45.75
7/30/2009 0.25 4384.30 4382.00 45.72
7/31/2009 0.25 4384.30 4382.00 45.68
7/31/2009 0.25 4384.30 4382.00 45.65
8/1/2009 0.25 4384.40 4382.00 45.62
8/1/2009 0.25 4384.40 4382.10 45.58
8/2/2009 0.26 4384.50 4382.10 45.55
8/2/2009 0.26 4384.50 4382.10 45.51
8/3/2009 0.26 4384.50 4382.10 45.48
8/3/2009 0.26 4384.60 4382.20 45.44
8/4/2009 0.26 4384.60 4382.20 45.41
8/5/2009 0.26 4384.60 4382.20 45.37
8/5/2009 0.26 4384.70 4382.20 45.34
8/6/2009 0.27 4384.70 4382.20 45.30
8/6/2009 0.27 4384.70 4382.30 45.27
8/7/2009 0.27 4384.80 4382.30 45.23
8/7/2009 0.27 4384.80 4382.30 45.20
8/8/2009 0.27 4384.80 4382.30 45.16
8/8/2009 0.27 4384.90 4382.40 45.13
8/9/2009 0.28 4384.90 4382.40 45.09
8/10/2009 0.28 4384.90 4382.40 45.05
8/10/2009 0.28 4385.00 4382.40 45.02
8/11/2009 0.28 4385.00 4382.50 44.98
8/11/2009 0.28 4385.10 4382.50 44.95
8/12/2009 0.28 4385.10 4382.50 44.91
8/12/2009 0.28 4385.10 4382.50 44.88
8/13/2009 0.29 4385.20 4382.50 44.84
8/13/2009 0.29 4385.20 4382.60 44.81
8/14/2009 0.29 4385.20 4382.60 44.78
8/15/2009 0.29 4385.30 4382.60 44.74
8/15/2009 0.29 4385.30 4382.60 44.71
8/16/2009 0.29 4385.30 4382.70 44.67
8/16/2009 0.30 4385.40 4382.70 44.64
8/17/2009 0.30 4385.40 4382.70 44.60
8/17/2009 0.30 4385.40 4382.70 44.57
8/18/2009 0.30 4385.50 4382.70 44.53
8/18/2009 0.30 4385.50 4382.80 44.50
8/19/2009 0.30 4385.50 4382.80 44.46
4 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
8/20/2009 0.30 4385.60 4382.80 44.43
8/20/2009 0.31 4385.60 4382.80 44.39
8/21/2009 0.31 4385.60 4382.90 44.36
8/21/2009 0.31 4385.70 4382.90 44.32
8/22/2009 0.31 4385.70 4382.90 44.29
8/22/2009 0.31 4385.70 4382.90 44.26
8/23/2009 0.31 4385.80 4383.00 44.22
8/23/2009 0.31 4385.80 4383.00 44.19
8/24/2009 0.32 4385.80 4383.00 44.15
8/25/2009 0.32 4385.90 4383.00 44.12
8/25/2009 0.32 4385.90 4383.00 44.08
8/26/2009 0.32 4386.00 4383.10 44.05
8/26/2009 0.32 4386.00 4383.10 44.01
8/27/2009 0.32 4386.00 4383.10 43.98
8/27/2009 0.33 4386.10 4383.10 43.95
8/28/2009 0.33 4386.10 4383.20 43.91
8/28/2009 0.33 4386.10 4383.20 43.88
8/29/2009 0.33 4386.20 4383.20 43.84
8/30/2009 0.33 4386.20 4383.20 43.81
8/30/2009 0.33 4386.20 4383.20 43.78
8/31/2009 0.33 4386.30 4383.30 43.74
8/31/2009 0.34 4386.30 4383.30 43.71
9/1/2009 0.34 4386.30 4383.30 43.67
9/1/2009 0.34 4386.40 4383.30 43.64
9/2/2009 0.34 4386.40 4383.40 43.60
9/2/2009 0.34 4386.40 4383.40 43.57
9/3/2009 0.34 4386.50 4383.40 43.54
9/4/2009 0.35 4386.50 4383.40 43.50
9/4/2009 0.35 4386.50 4383.50 43.47
9/5/2009 0.35 4386.60 4383.50 43.43
9/5/2009 0.35 4386.60 4383.50 43.40
9/6/2009 0.35 4386.60 4383.50 43.37
9/6/2009 0.35 4386.70 4383.50 43.33
9/7/2009 0.35 4386.70 4383.60 43.30
9/7/2009 0.36 4386.70 4383.60 43.26
9/8/2009 0.36 4386.80 4383.60 43.23
9/9/2009 0.36 4386.80 4383.60 43.20
9/9/2009 0.36 4386.80 4383.70 43.16
9/10/2009 0.36 4386.90 4383.70 43.13
9/10/2009 0.36 4386.90 4383.70 43.09
9/11/2009 0.37 4386.90 4383.70 43.06
9/11/2009 0.37 4387.00 4383.70 43.03
9/12/2009 0.37 4387.00 4383.80 42.99
9/12/2009 0.37 4387.00 4383.80 42.96
9/13/2009 0.37 4387.10 4383.80 42.93
9/14/2009 0.37 4387.10 4383.80 42.89
9/14/2009 0.37 4387.10 4383.90 42.86
9/15/2009 0.38 4387.20 4383.90 42.82
9/15/2009 0.38 4387.20 4383.90 42.79
9/16/2009 0.38 4387.20 4383.90 42.76
5 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
9/16/2009 0.38 4387.30 4384.00 42.72
9/17/2009 0.38 4387.30 4384.00 42.69
9/17/2009 0.38 4387.30 4384.00 42.66
9/18/2009 0.38 4387.40 4384.00 42.62
9/19/2009 0.39 4387.40 4384.00 42.59
9/19/2009 0.39 4387.40 4384.10 42.56
9/20/2009 0.39 4387.50 4384.10 42.52
9/20/2009 0.39 4387.50 4384.10 42.49
9/21/2009 0.39 4387.50 4384.10 42.46
9/21/2009 0.39 4387.60 4384.20 42.42
9/22/2009 0.40 4387.60 4384.20 42.39
9/22/2009 0.40 4387.60 4384.20 42.36
9/23/2009 0.40 4387.70 4384.20 42.32
9/24/2009 0.40 4387.70 4384.20 42.29
9/24/2009 0.40 4387.70 4384.30 42.26
9/25/2009 0.40 4387.80 4384.30 42.22
9/25/2009 0.40 4387.80 4384.30 42.19
9/26/2009 0.41 4387.80 4384.30 42.16
9/26/2009 0.41 4387.90 4384.40 42.12
9/27/2009 0.41 4387.90 4384.40 42.09
9/27/2009 0.41 4387.90 4384.40 42.06
9/28/2009 0.41 4388.00 4384.40 42.03
9/29/2009 0.41 4388.00 4384.50 41.99
9/29/2009 0.42 4388.00 4384.50 41.96
9/30/2009 0.42 4388.10 4384.50 41.93
9/30/2009 0.42 4388.10 4384.50 41.89
10/1/2009 0.42 4388.10 4384.50 41.86
10/1/2009 0.42 4388.20 4384.60 41.83
10/2/2009 0.42 4388.20 4384.60 41.79
10/2/2009 0.42 4388.20 4384.60 41.76
10/3/2009 0.43 4388.30 4384.60 41.72
10/4/2009 0.43 4388.30 4384.70 41.69
10/4/2009 0.43 4388.30 4384.70 41.66
10/5/2009 0.43 4388.40 4384.70 41.62
10/5/2009 0.43 4388.40 4384.70 41.59
10/6/2009 0.43 4388.40 4384.70 41.55
10/6/2009 0.43 4388.50 4384.80 41.52
10/7/2009 0.44 4388.50 4384.80 41.48
10/7/2009 0.44 4388.50 4384.80 41.45
10/8/2009 0.44 4388.60 4384.80 41.42
10/9/2009 0.44 4388.60 4384.90 41.38
10/9/2009 0.44 4388.70 4384.90 41.35
10/10/2009 0.44 4388.70 4384.90 41.31
10/10/2009 0.45 4388.70 4384.90 41.28
10/11/2009 0.45 4388.80 4385.00 41.25
10/11/2009 0.45 4388.80 4385.00 41.21
10/12/2009 0.45 4388.80 4385.00 41.18
10/12/2009 0.45 4388.90 4385.00 41.15
10/13/2009 0.45 4388.90 4385.00 41.11
10/14/2009 0.45 4388.90 4385.10 41.08
6 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
10/14/2009 0.46 4389.00 4385.10 41.04
10/15/2009 0.46 4389.00 4385.10 41.01
10/15/2009 0.46 4389.00 4385.10 40.98
10/16/2009 0.46 4389.10 4385.20 40.94
10/16/2009 0.46 4389.10 4385.20 40.91
10/17/2009 0.46 4389.10 4385.20 40.88
10/17/2009 0.47 4389.20 4385.20 40.84
10/18/2009 0.47 4389.20 4385.20 40.81
10/19/2009 0.47 4389.20 4385.30 40.77
10/19/2009 0.47 4389.30 4385.30 40.74
10/20/2009 0.47 4389.30 4385.30 40.71
10/20/2009 0.47 4389.30 4385.30 40.67
10/21/2009 0.47 4389.40 4385.40 40.64
10/21/2009 0.48 4389.40 4385.40 40.61
10/22/2009 0.48 4389.40 4385.40 40.57
10/22/2009 0.48 4389.50 4385.40 40.54
10/23/2009 0.48 4389.50 4385.50 40.51
10/24/2009 0.48 4389.50 4385.50 40.47
10/24/2009 0.48 4389.60 4385.50 40.44
10/25/2009 0.49 4389.60 4385.50 40.41
10/25/2009 0.49 4389.60 4385.50 40.37
10/26/2009 0.49 4389.70 4385.60 40.34
10/26/2009 0.49 4389.70 4385.60 40.31
10/27/2009 0.49 4389.70 4385.60 40.27
10/27/2009 0.49 4389.80 4385.60 40.24
10/28/2009 0.49 4389.80 4385.70 40.21
10/29/2009 0.50 4389.80 4385.70 40.17
10/29/2009 0.50 4389.90 4385.70 40.14
10/30/2009 0.50 4389.90 4385.70 40.11
10/30/2009 0.50 4389.90 4385.70 40.07
10/31/2009 0.50 4390.00 4385.80 40.04
10/31/2009 0.50 4390.00 4385.80 40.01
11/1/2009 0.50 4390.00 4385.80 39.98
11/1/2009 0.51 4390.00 4385.80 39.96
11/2/2009 0.51 4390.10 4385.90 39.94
11/3/2009 0.51 4390.10 4385.90 39.92
11/3/2009 0.51 4390.10 4385.90 39.89
11/4/2009 0.51 4390.10 4385.90 39.87
11/4/2009 0.51 4390.20 4386.00 39.85
11/5/2009 0.52 4390.20 4386.00 39.83
11/5/2009 0.52 4390.20 4386.00 39.81
11/6/2009 0.52 4390.20 4386.00 39.78
11/6/2009 0.52 4390.20 4386.00 39.76
11/7/2009 0.52 4390.30 4386.10 39.74
11/8/2009 0.52 4390.30 4386.10 39.72
11/8/2009 0.52 4390.30 4386.10 39.69
11/9/2009 0.53 4390.30 4386.10 39.67
11/9/2009 0.53 4390.40 4386.20 39.65
11/10/2009 0.53 4390.40 4386.20 39.63
11/10/2009 0.53 4390.40 4386.20 39.60
7 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
11/11/2009 0.53 4390.40 4386.20 39.58
11/11/2009 0.53 4390.40 4386.20 39.56
11/12/2009 0.54 4390.50 4386.30 39.54
11/13/2009 0.54 4390.50 4386.30 39.52
11/13/2009 0.54 4390.50 4386.30 39.49
11/14/2009 0.54 4390.50 4386.30 39.47
11/14/2009 0.54 4390.60 4386.40 39.45
11/15/2009 0.54 4390.60 4386.40 39.43
11/15/2009 0.54 4390.60 4386.40 39.40
11/16/2009 0.55 4390.60 4386.40 39.38
11/16/2009 0.55 4390.60 4386.50 39.36
11/17/2009 0.55 4390.70 4386.50 39.34
11/18/2009 0.55 4390.70 4386.50 39.32
11/18/2009 0.55 4390.70 4386.50 39.29
11/19/2009 0.55 4390.70 4386.50 39.27
11/19/2009 0.56 4390.80 4386.60 39.25
11/20/2009 0.56 4390.80 4386.60 39.23
11/20/2009 0.56 4390.80 4386.60 39.21
11/21/2009 0.56 4390.80 4386.60 39.18
11/21/2009 0.56 4390.80 4386.70 39.16
11/22/2009 0.56 4390.90 4386.70 39.14
11/23/2009 0.56 4390.90 4386.70 39.12
11/23/2009 0.57 4390.90 4386.70 39.09
11/24/2009 0.57 4390.90 4386.70 39.07
11/24/2009 0.57 4391.00 4386.80 39.05
11/25/2009 0.57 4391.00 4386.80 39.03
11/25/2009 0.57 4391.00 4386.80 39.01
11/26/2009 0.57 4391.00 4386.80 38.98
11/26/2009 0.57 4391.00 4386.90 38.96
11/27/2009 0.58 4391.10 4386.90 38.94
11/28/2009 0.58 4391.10 4386.90 38.92
11/28/2009 0.58 4391.10 4386.90 38.90
11/29/2009 0.58 4391.10 4387.00 38.87
11/29/2009 0.58 4391.10 4387.00 38.85
11/30/2009 0.58 4391.20 4387.00 38.83
11/30/2009 0.59 4391.20 4387.00 38.81
12/1/2009 0.59 4391.20 4387.00 38.79
12/1/2009 0.59 4391.20 4387.10 38.76
12/2/2009 0.59 4391.30 4387.10 38.74
12/3/2009 0.59 4391.30 4387.10 38.71
12/3/2009 0.59 4391.30 4387.10 38.69
12/4/2009 0.59 4391.30 4387.20 38.67
12/4/2009 0.60 4391.40 4387.20 38.64
12/5/2009 0.60 4391.40 4387.20 38.62
12/5/2009 0.60 4391.40 4387.20 38.60
12/6/2009 0.60 4391.40 4387.30 38.57
12/6/2009 0.60 4391.50 4387.30 38.55
12/7/2009 0.60 4391.50 4387.30 38.53
12/8/2009 0.61 4391.50 4387.30 38.50
12/8/2009 0.61 4391.50 4387.30 38.48
8 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
12/9/2009 0.61 4391.50 4387.40 38.46
12/9/2009 0.61 4391.60 4387.40 38.43
12/10/2009 0.61 4391.60 4387.40 38.41
12/10/2009 0.61 4391.60 4387.40 38.39
12/11/2009 0.61 4391.60 4387.50 38.36
12/11/2009 0.62 4391.70 4387.50 38.34
12/12/2009 0.62 4391.70 4387.50 38.31
12/13/2009 0.62 4391.70 4387.50 38.29
12/13/2009 0.62 4391.70 4387.50 38.27
12/14/2009 0.62 4391.80 4387.60 38.24
12/14/2009 0.62 4391.80 4387.60 38.22
12/15/2009 0.63 4391.80 4387.60 38.20
12/15/2009 0.63 4391.80 4387.60 38.17
12/16/2009 0.63 4391.90 4387.70 38.15
12/16/2009 0.63 4391.90 4387.70 38.13
12/17/2009 0.63 4391.90 4387.70 38.10
12/18/2009 0.63 4391.90 4387.70 38.08
12/18/2009 0.63 4391.90 4387.80 38.06
12/19/2009 0.64 4392.00 4387.80 38.03
12/19/2009 0.64 4392.00 4387.80 38.01
12/20/2009 0.64 4392.00 4387.80 37.99
12/20/2009 0.64 4392.00 4387.80 37.96
12/21/2009 0.64 4392.10 4387.90 37.94
12/21/2009 0.64 4392.10 4387.90 37.92
12/22/2009 0.64 4392.10 4387.90 37.89
12/23/2009 0.65 4392.10 4387.90 37.87
12/23/2009 0.65 4392.20 4388.00 37.85
12/24/2009 0.65 4392.20 4388.00 37.82
12/24/2009 0.65 4392.20 4388.00 37.80
12/25/2009 0.65 4392.20 4388.00 37.78
12/25/2009 0.65 4392.20 4388.00 37.75
12/26/2009 0.66 4392.30 4388.10 37.73
12/26/2009 0.66 4392.30 4388.10 37.71
12/27/2009 0.66 4392.30 4388.10 37.68
12/28/2009 0.66 4392.30 4388.10 37.66
12/28/2009 0.66 4392.40 4388.20 37.64
12/29/2009 0.66 4392.40 4388.20 37.61
12/29/2009 0.66 4392.40 4388.20 37.59
12/30/2009 0.67 4392.40 4388.20 37.57
12/30/2009 0.67 4392.50 4388.30 37.54
12/31/2009 0.67 4392.50 4388.30 37.52
12/31/2009 0.67 4392.50 4388.30 37.50
1/1/2010 0.67 4392.50 4388.30 37.47
1/2/2010 0.67 4392.60 4388.30 37.45
1/2/2010 0.68 4392.60 4388.40 37.42
1/3/2010 0.68 4392.60 4388.40 37.40
1/3/2010 0.68 4392.60 4388.40 37.37
1/4/2010 0.68 4392.70 4388.40 37.35
1/4/2010 0.68 4392.70 4388.50 37.33
1/5/2010 0.68 4392.70 4388.50 37.30
9 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
1/5/2010 0.68 4392.70 4388.50 37.28
1/6/2010 0.69 4392.70 4388.50 37.25
1/7/2010 0.69 4392.80 4388.50 37.23
1/7/2010 0.69 4392.80 4388.60 37.20
1/8/2010 0.69 4392.80 4388.60 37.18
1/8/2010 0.69 4392.80 4388.60 37.15
1/9/2010 0.69 4392.90 4388.60 37.13
1/9/2010 0.70 4392.90 4388.70 37.11
1/10/2010 0.70 4392.90 4388.70 37.08
1/10/2010 0.70 4392.90 4388.70 37.06
1/11/2010 0.70 4393.00 4388.70 37.03
1/12/2010 0.70 4393.00 4388.80 37.01
1/12/2010 0.70 4393.00 4388.80 36.98
1/13/2010 0.70 4393.00 4388.80 36.96
1/13/2010 0.71 4393.10 4388.80 36.93
1/14/2010 0.71 4393.10 4388.80 36.91
1/14/2010 0.71 4393.10 4388.90 36.89
1/15/2010 0.71 4393.10 4388.90 36.86
1/15/2010 0.71 4393.20 4388.90 36.84
1/16/2010 0.71 4393.20 4388.90 36.81
1/17/2010 0.71 4393.20 4389.00 36.79
1/17/2010 0.72 4393.20 4389.00 36.76
1/18/2010 0.72 4393.30 4389.00 36.74
1/18/2010 0.72 4393.30 4389.00 36.71
1/19/2010 0.72 4393.30 4389.00 36.69
1/19/2010 0.72 4393.30 4389.10 36.67
1/20/2010 0.72 4393.40 4389.10 36.64
1/20/2010 0.73 4393.40 4389.10 36.62
1/21/2010 0.73 4393.40 4389.10 36.59
1/22/2010 0.73 4393.40 4389.20 36.57
1/22/2010 0.73 4393.50 4389.20 36.54
1/23/2010 0.73 4393.50 4389.20 36.52
1/23/2010 0.73 4393.50 4389.20 36.50
1/24/2010 0.73 4393.50 4389.30 36.47
1/24/2010 0.74 4393.60 4389.30 36.45
1/25/2010 0.74 4393.60 4389.30 36.42
1/25/2010 0.74 4393.60 4389.30 36.40
1/26/2010 0.74 4393.60 4389.30 36.37
1/27/2010 0.74 4393.70 4389.40 36.35
1/27/2010 0.74 4393.70 4389.40 36.33
1/28/2010 0.75 4393.70 4389.40 36.30
1/28/2010 0.75 4393.70 4389.40 36.28
1/29/2010 0.75 4393.70 4389.50 36.25
1/29/2010 0.75 4393.80 4389.50 36.23
1/30/2010 0.75 4393.80 4389.50 36.20
1/30/2010 0.75 4393.80 4389.50 36.18
1/31/2010 0.75 4393.80 4389.50 36.16
2/1/2010 0.76 4393.90 4389.60 36.13
2/1/2010 0.76 4393.90 4389.60 36.11
2/2/2010 0.76 4393.90 4389.60 36.08
10 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
2/2/2010 0.76 4393.90 4389.60 36.06
2/3/2010 0.76 4394.00 4389.70 36.03
2/3/2010 0.76 4394.00 4389.70 36.01
2/4/2010 0.77 4394.00 4389.70 35.98
2/4/2010 0.77 4394.00 4389.70 35.96
2/5/2010 0.77 4394.10 4389.80 35.94
2/6/2010 0.77 4394.10 4389.80 35.91
2/6/2010 0.77 4394.10 4389.80 35.89
2/7/2010 0.77 4394.10 4389.80 35.86
2/7/2010 0.77 4394.20 4389.80 35.84
2/8/2010 0.78 4394.20 4389.90 35.81
2/8/2010 0.78 4394.20 4389.90 35.79
2/9/2010 0.78 4394.20 4389.90 35.77
2/9/2010 0.78 4394.30 4389.90 35.74
2/10/2010 0.78 4394.30 4390.00 35.72
2/11/2010 0.78 4394.30 4390.00 35.69
2/11/2010 0.78 4394.30 4390.00 35.67
2/12/2010 0.79 4394.40 4390.00 35.64
2/12/2010 0.79 4394.40 4390.00 35.62
2/13/2010 0.79 4394.40 4390.00 35.60
2/13/2010 0.79 4394.40 4390.10 35.57
2/14/2010 0.79 4394.50 4390.10 35.55
2/14/2010 0.79 4394.50 4390.10 35.52
2/15/2010 0.80 4394.50 4390.10 35.50
2/16/2010 0.80 4394.50 4390.10 35.47
2/16/2010 0.80 4394.60 4390.10 35.45
2/17/2010 0.80 4394.60 4390.10 35.43
2/17/2010 0.80 4394.60 4390.20 35.40
2/18/2010 0.80 4394.60 4390.20 35.38
2/18/2010 0.80 4394.60 4390.20 35.35
2/19/2010 0.81 4394.70 4390.20 35.33
2/19/2010 0.81 4394.70 4390.20 35.30
2/20/2010 0.81 4394.70 4390.20 35.28
2/21/2010 0.81 4394.70 4390.30 35.26
2/21/2010 0.81 4394.80 4390.30 35.23
2/22/2010 0.81 4394.80 4390.30 35.21
2/22/2010 0.82 4394.80 4390.30 35.18
2/23/2010 0.82 4394.80 4390.30 35.16
2/23/2010 0.82 4394.90 4390.30 35.13
2/24/2010 0.82 4394.90 4390.30 35.11
2/24/2010 0.82 4394.90 4390.40 35.09
2/25/2010 0.82 4394.90 4390.40 35.06
2/26/2010 0.82 4395.00 4390.40 35.04
2/26/2010 0.83 4395.00 4390.40 35.01
2/27/2010 0.83 4395.00 4390.40 34.99
2/27/2010 0.83 4395.00 4390.40 34.96
2/28/2010 0.83 4395.10 4390.40 34.94
2/28/2010 0.83 4395.10 4390.50 34.92
3/1/2010 0.83 4395.10 4390.50 34.89
3/1/2010 0.83 4395.10 4390.50 34.87
11 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
3/2/2010 0.84 4395.20 4390.50 34.84
3/3/2010 0.84 4395.20 4390.50 34.82
3/3/2010 0.84 4395.20 4390.50 34.79
3/4/2010 0.84 4395.20 4390.50 34.77
3/4/2010 0.84 4395.30 4390.60 34.74
3/5/2010 0.84 4395.30 4390.60 34.72
3/5/2010 0.85 4395.30 4390.60 34.69
3/6/2010 0.85 4395.30 4390.60 34.67
3/6/2010 0.85 4395.40 4390.60 34.64
3/7/2010 0.85 4395.40 4390.60 34.62
3/8/2010 0.85 4395.40 4390.70 34.59
3/8/2010 0.85 4395.40 4390.70 34.57
3/9/2010 0.85 4395.50 4390.70 34.54
3/9/2010 0.86 4395.50 4390.70 34.52
3/10/2010 0.86 4395.50 4390.70 34.49
3/10/2010 0.86 4395.50 4390.70 34.46
3/11/2010 0.86 4395.60 4390.70 34.44
3/11/2010 0.86 4395.60 4390.80 34.41
3/12/2010 0.86 4395.60 4390.80 34.39
3/13/2010 0.87 4395.60 4390.80 34.36
3/13/2010 0.87 4395.70 4390.80 34.34
3/14/2010 0.87 4395.70 4390.80 34.31
3/14/2010 0.87 4395.70 4390.80 34.29
3/15/2010 0.87 4395.70 4390.80 34.26
3/15/2010 0.87 4395.80 4390.90 34.24
3/16/2010 0.87 4395.80 4390.90 34.21
3/16/2010 0.88 4395.80 4390.90 34.19
3/17/2010 0.88 4395.80 4390.90 34.16
3/18/2010 0.88 4395.90 4390.90 34.14
3/18/2010 0.88 4395.90 4390.90 34.11
3/19/2010 0.88 4395.90 4390.90 34.09
3/19/2010 0.88 4395.90 4391.00 34.06
3/20/2010 0.89 4396.00 4391.00 34.04
3/20/2010 0.89 4396.00 4391.00 34.01
3/21/2010 0.89 4396.00 4391.00 33.99
3/21/2010 0.89 4396.00 4391.00 33.96
3/22/2010 0.89 4396.10 4391.00 33.94
3/23/2010 0.89 4396.10 4391.10 33.91
3/23/2010 0.89 4396.10 4391.10 33.89
3/24/2010 0.90 4396.10 4391.10 33.86
3/24/2010 0.90 4396.20 4391.10 33.84
3/25/2010 0.90 4396.20 4391.10 33.81
3/25/2010 0.90 4396.20 4391.10 33.79
3/26/2010 0.90 4396.20 4391.10 33.76
3/26/2010 0.90 4396.30 4391.20 33.74
3/27/2010 0.90 4396.30 4391.20 33.71
3/28/2010 0.91 4396.30 4391.20 33.69
3/28/2010 0.91 4396.30 4391.20 33.66
3/29/2010 0.91 4396.40 4391.20 33.64
3/29/2010 0.91 4396.40 4391.20 33.61
12 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
3/30/2010 0.91 4396.40 4391.20 33.59
3/30/2010 0.91 4396.40 4391.30 33.56
3/31/2010 0.92 4396.50 4391.30 33.54
3/31/2010 0.92 4396.50 4391.30 33.51
4/1/2010 0.92 4396.50 4391.30 33.49
4/2/2010 0.92 4396.50 4391.30 33.47
4/2/2010 0.92 4396.60 4391.30 33.44
4/3/2010 0.92 4396.60 4391.30 33.42
4/3/2010 0.92 4396.60 4391.40 33.40
4/4/2010 0.93 4396.60 4391.40 33.38
4/4/2010 0.93 4396.60 4391.40 33.36
4/5/2010 0.93 4396.70 4391.40 33.33
4/5/2010 0.93 4396.70 4391.40 33.31
4/6/2010 0.93 4396.70 4391.40 33.29
4/7/2010 0.93 4396.70 4391.50 33.27
4/7/2010 0.94 4396.80 4391.50 33.24
4/8/2010 0.94 4396.80 4391.50 33.22
4/8/2010 0.94 4396.80 4391.50 33.20
4/9/2010 0.94 4396.80 4391.50 33.18
4/9/2010 0.94 4396.80 4391.50 33.15
4/10/2010 0.94 4396.90 4391.50 33.13
4/10/2010 0.94 4396.90 4391.60 33.11
4/11/2010 0.95 4396.90 4391.60 33.09
4/12/2010 0.95 4396.90 4391.60 33.06
4/12/2010 0.95 4397.00 4391.60 33.04
4/13/2010 0.95 4397.00 4391.60 33.02
4/13/2010 0.95 4397.00 4391.60 33.00
4/14/2010 0.95 4397.00 4391.60 32.98
4/14/2010 0.96 4397.00 4391.70 32.95
4/15/2010 0.96 4397.10 4391.70 32.93
4/15/2010 0.96 4397.10 4391.70 32.91
4/16/2010 0.96 4397.10 4391.70 32.89
4/17/2010 0.96 4397.10 4391.70 32.86
4/17/2010 0.96 4397.20 4391.70 32.84
4/18/2010 0.96 4397.20 4391.70 32.82
4/18/2010 0.97 4397.20 4391.80 32.80
4/19/2010 0.97 4397.20 4391.80 32.77
4/19/2010 0.97 4397.20 4391.80 32.75
4/20/2010 0.97 4397.30 4391.80 32.73
4/20/2010 0.97 4397.30 4391.80 32.71
4/21/2010 0.97 4397.30 4391.80 32.69
4/22/2010 0.97 4397.30 4391.90 32.66
4/22/2010 0.98 4397.40 4391.90 32.64
4/23/2010 0.98 4397.40 4391.90 32.62
4/23/2010 0.98 4397.40 4391.90 32.60
4/24/2010 0.98 4397.40 4391.90 32.57
4/24/2010 0.98 4397.40 4391.90 32.55
4/25/2010 0.98 4397.50 4391.90 32.53
4/25/2010 0.99 4397.50 4392.00 32.51
4/26/2010 0.99 4397.50 4392.00 32.49
13 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
4/27/2010 0.99 4397.50 4392.00 32.46
4/27/2010 0.99 4397.60 4392.00 32.44
4/28/2010 0.99 4397.60 4392.00 32.42
4/28/2010 0.99 4397.60 4392.00 32.40
4/29/2010 0.99 4397.60 4392.00 32.37
4/29/2010 1.00 4397.60 4392.10 32.35
4/30/2010 1.00 4397.70 4392.10 32.33
4/30/2010 1.00 4397.70 4392.10 32.31
5/1/2010 1.00 4397.70 4392.10 32.29
5/2/2010 1.00 4397.70 4392.10 32.26
5/2/2010 1.00 4397.80 4392.10 32.24
5/3/2010 1.01 4397.80 4392.10 32.22
5/3/2010 1.01 4397.80 4392.20 32.20
5/4/2010 1.01 4397.80 4392.20 32.18
5/4/2010 1.01 4397.80 4392.20 32.16
5/5/2010 1.01 4397.90 4392.20 32.13
5/5/2010 1.01 4397.90 4392.20 32.11
5/6/2010 1.01 4397.90 4392.20 32.09
5/7/2010 1.02 4397.90 4392.30 32.07
5/7/2010 1.02 4398.00 4392.30 32.05
5/8/2010 1.02 4398.00 4392.30 32.03
5/8/2010 1.02 4398.00 4392.30 32.01
5/9/2010 1.02 4398.00 4392.30 31.98
5/9/2010 1.02 4398.00 4392.30 31.96
5/10/2010 1.03 4398.10 4392.30 31.94
5/10/2010 1.03 4398.10 4392.40 31.92
5/11/2010 1.03 4398.10 4392.40 31.90
5/12/2010 1.03 4398.10 4392.40 31.88
5/12/2010 1.03 4398.10 4392.40 31.85
5/13/2010 1.03 4398.20 4392.40 31.83
5/13/2010 1.03 4398.20 4392.40 31.81
5/14/2010 1.04 4398.20 4392.40 31.79
5/14/2010 1.04 4398.20 4392.50 31.77
5/15/2010 1.04 4398.30 4392.50 31.75
5/15/2010 1.04 4398.30 4392.50 31.73
5/16/2010 1.04 4398.30 4392.50 31.70
5/17/2010 1.04 4398.30 4392.50 31.68
5/17/2010 1.04 4398.30 4392.50 31.66
5/18/2010 1.05 4398.40 4392.50 31.64
5/18/2010 1.05 4398.40 4392.60 31.62
5/19/2010 1.05 4398.40 4392.60 31.60
5/19/2010 1.05 4398.40 4392.60 31.58
5/20/2010 1.05 4398.40 4392.60 31.55
5/20/2010 1.05 4398.50 4392.60 31.53
5/21/2010 1.06 4398.50 4392.60 31.51
5/22/2010 1.06 4398.50 4392.60 31.49
5/22/2010 1.06 4398.50 4392.70 31.47
5/23/2010 1.06 4398.60 4392.70 31.45
5/23/2010 1.06 4398.60 4392.70 31.43
5/24/2010 1.06 4398.60 4392.70 31.40
14 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
5/24/2010 1.06 4398.60 4392.70 31.38
5/25/2010 1.07 4398.60 4392.70 31.36
5/25/2010 1.07 4398.70 4392.80 31.34
5/26/2010 1.07 4398.70 4392.80 31.32
5/27/2010 1.07 4398.70 4392.80 31.30
5/27/2010 1.07 4398.70 4392.80 31.28
5/28/2010 1.07 4398.70 4392.80 31.25
5/28/2010 1.08 4398.80 4392.80 31.23
5/29/2010 1.08 4398.80 4392.80 31.21
5/29/2010 1.08 4398.80 4392.90 31.19
5/30/2010 1.08 4398.80 4392.90 31.17
5/30/2010 1.08 4398.90 4392.90 31.15
5/31/2010 1.08 4398.90 4392.90 31.13
6/1/2010 1.08 4398.90 4392.90 31.10
6/1/2010 1.09 4398.90 4392.90 31.08
6/2/2010 1.09 4398.90 4392.90 31.07
6/2/2010 1.09 4399.00 4393.00 31.05
6/3/2010 1.09 4399.00 4393.00 31.03
6/3/2010 1.09 4399.00 4393.00 31.01
6/4/2010 1.09 4399.00 4393.00 30.99
6/4/2010 1.10 4399.00 4393.00 30.97
6/5/2010 1.10 4399.00 4393.00 30.95
6/6/2010 1.10 4399.10 4393.00 30.93
6/6/2010 1.10 4399.10 4393.10 30.91
6/7/2010 1.10 4399.10 4393.10 30.89
6/7/2010 1.10 4399.10 4393.10 30.87
6/8/2010 1.10 4399.10 4393.10 30.86
6/8/2010 1.11 4399.20 4393.10 30.84
6/9/2010 1.11 4399.20 4393.10 30.82
6/9/2010 1.11 4399.20 4393.20 30.80
6/10/2010 1.11 4399.20 4393.20 30.78
6/11/2010 1.11 4399.20 4393.20 30.76
6/11/2010 1.11 4399.30 4393.20 30.74
6/12/2010 1.11 4399.30 4393.20 30.72
6/12/2010 1.12 4399.30 4393.20 30.70
6/13/2010 1.12 4399.30 4393.20 30.68
6/13/2010 1.12 4399.30 4393.30 30.66
6/14/2010 1.12 4399.40 4393.30 30.65
6/14/2010 1.12 4399.40 4393.30 30.63
6/15/2010 1.12 4399.40 4393.30 30.61
6/16/2010 1.13 4399.40 4393.30 30.59
6/16/2010 1.13 4399.40 4393.30 30.57
6/17/2010 1.13 4399.50 4393.30 30.55
6/17/2010 1.13 4399.50 4393.40 30.53
6/18/2010 1.13 4399.50 4393.40 30.51
6/18/2010 1.13 4399.50 4393.40 30.49
6/19/2010 1.13 4399.50 4393.40 30.47
6/19/2010 1.14 4399.50 4393.40 30.46
6/20/2010 1.14 4399.60 4393.40 30.44
6/21/2010 1.14 4399.60 4393.40 30.42
15 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
6/21/2010 1.14 4399.60 4393.50 30.40
6/22/2010 1.14 4399.60 4393.50 30.38
6/22/2010 1.14 4399.60 4393.50 30.36
6/23/2010 1.15 4399.70 4393.50 30.34
6/23/2010 1.15 4399.70 4393.50 30.32
6/24/2010 1.15 4399.70 4393.50 30.30
6/24/2010 1.15 4399.70 4393.60 30.28
6/25/2010 1.15 4399.70 4393.60 30.27
6/26/2010 1.15 4399.80 4393.60 30.25
6/26/2010 1.15 4399.80 4393.60 30.23
6/27/2010 1.16 4399.80 4393.60 30.21
6/27/2010 1.16 4399.80 4393.60 30.19
6/28/2010 1.16 4399.80 4393.60 30.17
6/28/2010 1.16 4399.80 4393.70 30.15
6/29/2010 1.16 4399.90 4393.70 30.13
6/29/2010 1.16 4399.90 4393.70 30.11
6/30/2010 1.17 4399.90 4393.70 30.10
7/1/2010 1.17 4399.90 4393.70 30.08
7/1/2010 1.17 4399.90 4393.70 30.06
7/2/2010 1.17 4400.00 4393.70 30.05
7/2/2010 1.17 4400.00 4393.80 30.03
7/3/2010 1.17 4400.00 4393.80 30.02
7/3/2010 1.17 4400.00 4393.80 30.00
7/4/2010 1.18 4400.00 4393.80 29.99
7/4/2010 1.18 4400.00 4393.80 29.98
7/5/2010 1.18 4400.00 4393.80 29.97
7/6/2010 1.18 4400.00 4393.80 29.96
7/6/2010 1.18 4400.10 4393.90 29.95
7/7/2010 1.18 4400.10 4393.90 29.94
7/7/2010 1.18 4400.10 4393.90 29.93
7/8/2010 1.19 4400.10 4393.90 29.91
7/8/2010 1.19 4400.10 4393.90 29.90
7/9/2010 1.19 4400.10 4393.90 29.89
7/9/2010 1.19 4400.10 4394.00 29.88
7/10/2010 1.19 4400.10 4394.00 29.87
7/11/2010 1.19 4400.10 4394.00 29.86
7/11/2010 1.20 4400.20 4394.00 29.85
7/12/2010 1.20 4400.20 4394.00 29.84
7/12/2010 1.20 4400.20 4394.00 29.82
7/13/2010 1.20 4400.20 4394.00 29.81
7/13/2010 1.20 4400.20 4394.10 29.80
7/14/2010 1.20 4400.20 4394.10 29.79
7/14/2010 1.20 4400.20 4394.10 29.78
7/15/2010 1.21 4400.20 4394.10 29.77
7/16/2010 1.21 4400.20 4394.10 29.76
7/16/2010 1.21 4400.30 4394.10 29.75
7/17/2010 1.21 4400.30 4394.10 29.74
7/17/2010 1.21 4400.30 4394.20 29.72
7/18/2010 1.21 4400.30 4394.20 29.71
7/18/2010 1.22 4400.30 4394.20 29.70
16 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
7/19/2010 1.22 4400.30 4394.20 29.69
7/19/2010 1.22 4400.30 4394.20 29.68
7/20/2010 1.22 4400.30 4394.20 29.67
7/21/2010 1.22 4400.30 4394.20 29.66
7/21/2010 1.22 4400.40 4394.30 29.65
7/22/2010 1.22 4400.40 4394.30 29.63
7/22/2010 1.23 4400.40 4394.30 29.62
7/23/2010 1.23 4400.40 4394.30 29.61
7/23/2010 1.23 4400.40 4394.30 29.60
7/24/2010 1.23 4400.40 4394.30 29.59
7/24/2010 1.23 4400.40 4394.40 29.58
7/25/2010 1.23 4400.40 4394.40 29.57
7/26/2010 1.24 4400.40 4394.40 29.56
7/26/2010 1.24 4400.50 4394.40 29.55
7/27/2010 1.24 4400.50 4394.40 29.53
7/27/2010 1.24 4400.50 4394.40 29.52
7/28/2010 1.24 4400.50 4394.40 29.51
7/28/2010 1.24 4400.50 4394.50 29.50
7/29/2010 1.24 4400.50 4394.50 29.49
7/29/2010 1.25 4400.50 4394.50 29.48
7/30/2010 1.25 4400.50 4394.50 29.47
7/31/2010 1.25 4400.50 4394.50 29.46
7/31/2010 1.25 4400.60 4394.50 29.45
8/1/2010 1.25 4400.60 4394.50 29.43
8/1/2010 1.25 4400.60 4394.60 29.42
8/2/2010 1.25 4400.60 4394.60 29.41
8/2/2010 1.26 4400.60 4394.60 29.40
8/3/2010 1.26 4400.60 4394.60 29.39
8/3/2010 1.26 4400.60 4394.60 29.38
8/4/2010 1.26 4400.60 4394.60 29.36
8/5/2010 1.26 4400.60 4394.60 29.35
8/5/2010 1.26 4400.70 4394.70 29.34
8/6/2010 1.27 4400.70 4394.70 29.33
8/6/2010 1.27 4400.70 4394.70 29.32
8/7/2010 1.27 4400.70 4394.70 29.31
8/7/2010 1.27 4400.70 4394.70 29.29
8/8/2010 1.27 4400.70 4394.70 29.28
8/8/2010 1.27 4400.70 4394.80 29.27
8/9/2010 1.27 4400.70 4394.80 29.26
8/10/2010 1.28 4400.80 4394.80 29.25
8/10/2010 1.28 4400.80 4394.80 29.24
8/11/2010 1.28 4400.80 4394.80 29.22
8/11/2010 1.28 4400.80 4394.80 29.21
8/12/2010 1.28 4400.80 4394.80 29.20
8/12/2010 1.28 4400.80 4394.90 29.19
8/13/2010 1.29 4400.80 4394.90 29.18
8/13/2010 1.29 4400.80 4394.90 29.17
8/14/2010 1.29 4400.80 4394.90 29.15
8/15/2010 1.29 4400.90 4394.90 29.14
8/15/2010 1.29 4400.90 4394.90 29.13
17 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
8/16/2010 1.29 4400.90 4394.90 29.12
8/16/2010 1.29 4400.90 4395.00 29.11
8/17/2010 1.30 4400.90 4395.00 29.10
8/17/2010 1.30 4400.90 4395.00 29.08
8/18/2010 1.30 4400.90 4395.00 29.07
8/18/2010 1.30 4400.90 4395.00 29.06
8/19/2010 1.30 4401.00 4395.00 29.05
8/20/2010 1.30 4401.00 4395.00 29.04
8/20/2010 1.31 4401.00 4395.10 29.03
8/21/2010 1.31 4401.00 4395.10 29.01
8/21/2010 1.31 4401.00 4395.10 29.00
8/22/2010 1.31 4401.00 4395.10 28.99
8/22/2010 1.31 4401.00 4395.10 28.98
8/23/2010 1.31 4401.00 4395.10 28.97
8/23/2010 1.31 4401.00 4395.10 28.96
8/24/2010 1.32 4401.10 4395.20 28.94
8/25/2010 1.32 4401.10 4395.20 28.93
8/25/2010 1.32 4401.10 4395.20 28.92
8/26/2010 1.32 4401.10 4395.20 28.91
8/26/2010 1.32 4401.10 4395.20 28.90
8/27/2010 1.32 4401.10 4395.20 28.89
8/27/2010 1.32 4401.10 4395.30 28.88
8/28/2010 1.33 4401.10 4395.30 28.86
8/28/2010 1.33 4401.10 4395.30 28.85
8/29/2010 1.33 4401.20 4395.30 28.84
8/30/2010 1.33 4401.20 4395.30 28.83
8/30/2010 1.33 4401.20 4395.30 28.82
8/31/2010 1.33 4401.20 4395.30 28.81
8/31/2010 1.34 4401.20 4395.40 28.79
9/1/2010 1.34 4401.20 4395.40 28.78
9/1/2010 1.34 4401.20 4395.40 28.77
9/2/2010 1.34 4401.20 4395.40 28.76
9/2/2010 1.34 4401.30 4395.40 28.75
9/3/2010 1.34 4401.30 4395.40 28.74
9/4/2010 1.34 4401.30 4395.40 28.72
9/4/2010 1.35 4401.30 4395.50 28.71
9/5/2010 1.35 4401.30 4395.50 28.70
9/5/2010 1.35 4401.30 4395.50 28.69
9/6/2010 1.35 4401.30 4395.50 28.68
9/6/2010 1.35 4401.30 4395.50 28.67
9/7/2010 1.35 4401.30 4395.50 28.65
9/7/2010 1.36 4401.40 4395.50 28.64
9/8/2010 1.36 4401.40 4395.60 28.63
9/9/2010 1.36 4401.40 4395.60 28.62
9/9/2010 1.36 4401.40 4395.60 28.61
9/10/2010 1.36 4401.40 4395.60 28.60
9/10/2010 1.36 4401.40 4395.60 28.58
9/11/2010 1.36 4401.40 4395.60 28.57
9/11/2010 1.37 4401.40 4395.70 28.56
9/12/2010 1.37 4401.50 4395.70 28.55
18 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
9/12/2010 1.37 4401.50 4395.70 28.54
9/13/2010 1.37 4401.50 4395.70 28.53
9/14/2010 1.37 4401.50 4395.70 28.51
9/14/2010 1.37 4401.50 4395.70 28.50
9/15/2010 1.37 4401.50 4395.70 28.49
9/15/2010 1.38 4401.50 4395.80 28.48
9/16/2010 1.38 4401.50 4395.80 28.47
9/16/2010 1.38 4401.50 4395.80 28.46
9/17/2010 1.38 4401.60 4395.80 28.44
9/17/2010 1.38 4401.60 4395.80 28.43
9/18/2010 1.38 4401.60 4395.80 28.42
9/19/2010 1.39 4401.60 4395.80 28.41
9/19/2010 1.39 4401.60 4395.90 28.40
9/20/2010 1.39 4401.60 4395.90 28.39
9/20/2010 1.39 4401.60 4395.90 28.37
9/21/2010 1.39 4401.60 4395.90 28.36
9/21/2010 1.39 4401.60 4395.90 28.35
9/22/2010 1.39 4401.70 4395.90 28.34
9/22/2010 1.40 4401.70 4395.90 28.33
9/23/2010 1.40 4401.70 4396.00 28.32
9/24/2010 1.40 4401.70 4396.00 28.30
9/24/2010 1.40 4401.70 4396.00 28.29
9/25/2010 1.40 4401.70 4396.00 28.28
9/25/2010 1.40 4401.70 4396.00 28.27
9/26/2010 1.41 4401.70 4396.00 28.26
9/26/2010 1.41 4401.80 4396.10 28.25
9/27/2010 1.41 4401.80 4396.10 28.24
9/27/2010 1.41 4401.80 4396.10 28.22
9/28/2010 1.41 4401.80 4396.10 28.21
9/29/2010 1.41 4401.80 4396.10 28.20
9/29/2010 1.41 4401.80 4396.10 28.19
9/30/2010 1.42 4401.80 4396.10 28.18
9/30/2010 1.42 4401.80 4396.20 28.17
10/1/2010 1.42 4401.80 4396.20 28.15
10/1/2010 1.42 4401.90 4396.20 28.14
10/2/2010 1.42 4401.90 4396.20 28.13
10/2/2010 1.42 4401.90 4396.20 28.11
10/3/2010 1.43 4401.90 4396.20 28.10
10/4/2010 1.43 4401.90 4396.20 28.09
10/4/2010 1.43 4401.90 4396.30 28.08
10/5/2010 1.43 4401.90 4396.30 28.06
10/5/2010 1.43 4402.00 4396.30 28.05
10/6/2010 1.43 4402.00 4396.30 28.04
10/6/2010 1.43 4402.00 4396.30 28.02
10/7/2010 1.44 4402.00 4396.30 28.01
10/7/2010 1.44 4402.00 4396.30 28.00
10/8/2010 1.44 4402.00 4396.40 27.98
10/9/2010 1.44 4402.00 4396.40 27.97
10/9/2010 1.44 4402.00 4396.40 27.96
10/10/2010 1.44 4402.10 4396.40 27.95
19 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
10/10/2010 1.44 4402.10 4396.40 27.93
10/11/2010 1.45 4402.10 4396.40 27.92
10/11/2010 1.45 4402.10 4396.50 27.91
10/12/2010 1.45 4402.10 4396.50 27.89
10/12/2010 1.45 4402.10 4396.50 27.88
10/13/2010 1.45 4402.10 4396.50 27.87
10/14/2010 1.45 4402.10 4396.50 27.85
10/14/2010 1.46 4402.20 4396.50 27.84
10/15/2010 1.46 4402.20 4396.50 27.83
10/15/2010 1.46 4402.20 4396.60 27.81
10/16/2010 1.46 4402.20 4396.60 27.80
10/16/2010 1.46 4402.20 4396.60 27.79
10/17/2010 1.46 4402.20 4396.60 27.78
10/17/2010 1.46 4402.20 4396.60 27.76
10/18/2010 1.47 4402.30 4396.60 27.75
10/19/2010 1.47 4402.30 4396.60 27.74
10/19/2010 1.47 4402.30 4396.70 27.72
10/20/2010 1.47 4402.30 4396.70 27.71
10/20/2010 1.47 4402.30 4396.70 27.70
10/21/2010 1.47 4402.30 4396.70 27.68
10/21/2010 1.48 4402.30 4396.70 27.67
10/22/2010 1.48 4402.30 4396.70 27.66
10/22/2010 1.48 4402.40 4396.70 27.65
10/23/2010 1.48 4402.40 4396.80 27.63
10/24/2010 1.48 4402.40 4396.80 27.62
10/24/2010 1.48 4402.40 4396.80 27.61
10/25/2010 1.48 4402.40 4396.80 27.59
10/25/2010 1.49 4402.40 4396.80 27.58
10/26/2010 1.49 4402.40 4396.80 27.57
10/26/2010 1.49 4402.40 4396.90 27.55
10/27/2010 1.49 4402.50 4396.90 27.54
10/27/2010 1.49 4402.50 4396.90 27.53
10/28/2010 1.49 4402.50 4396.90 27.52
10/29/2010 1.50 4402.50 4396.90 27.50
10/29/2010 1.50 4402.50 4396.90 27.49
10/30/2010 1.50 4402.50 4396.90 27.48
10/30/2010 1.50 4402.50 4397.00 27.46
10/31/2010 1.50 4402.50 4397.00 27.45
10/31/2010 1.50 4402.60 4397.00 27.44
11/1/2010 1.50 4402.60 4397.00 27.42
11/1/2010 1.51 4402.60 4397.00 27.41
11/2/2010 1.51 4402.60 4397.00 27.40
11/3/2010 1.51 4402.60 4397.00 27.38
11/3/2010 1.51 4402.60 4397.10 27.37
11/4/2010 1.51 4402.60 4397.10 27.35
11/4/2010 1.51 4402.70 4397.10 27.34
11/5/2010 1.51 4402.70 4397.10 27.32
11/5/2010 1.52 4402.70 4397.10 27.31
11/6/2010 1.52 4402.70 4397.10 27.29
11/6/2010 1.52 4402.70 4397.10 27.28
20 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
11/7/2010 1.52 4402.70 4397.20 27.26
11/8/2010 1.52 4402.80 4397.20 27.25
11/8/2010 1.52 4402.80 4397.20 27.23
11/9/2010 1.53 4402.80 4397.20 27.22
11/9/2010 1.53 4402.80 4397.20 27.20
11/10/2010 1.53 4402.80 4397.20 27.19
11/10/2010 1.53 4402.80 4397.30 27.17
11/11/2010 1.53 4402.80 4397.30 27.16
11/11/2010 1.53 4402.90 4397.30 27.14
11/12/2010 1.53 4402.90 4397.30 27.13
11/13/2010 1.54 4402.90 4397.30 27.11
11/13/2010 1.54 4402.90 4397.30 27.10
11/14/2010 1.54 4402.90 4397.30 27.08
11/14/2010 1.54 4402.90 4397.40 27.07
11/15/2010 1.54 4402.90 4397.40 27.05
11/15/2010 1.54 4403.00 4397.40 27.04
11/16/2010 1.55 4403.00 4397.40 27.02
11/16/2010 1.55 4403.00 4397.40 27.01
11/17/2010 1.55 4403.00 4397.40 26.99
11/18/2010 1.55 4403.00 4397.40 26.98
11/18/2010 1.55 4403.00 4397.50 26.97
11/19/2010 1.55 4403.00 4397.50 26.95
11/19/2010 1.55 4403.10 4397.50 26.94
11/20/2010 1.56 4403.10 4397.50 26.92
11/20/2010 1.56 4403.10 4397.50 26.91
11/21/2010 1.56 4403.10 4397.50 26.89
11/21/2010 1.56 4403.10 4397.50 26.88
11/22/2010 1.56 4403.10 4397.60 26.86
11/23/2010 1.56 4403.20 4397.60 26.85
11/23/2010 1.57 4403.20 4397.60 26.83
11/24/2010 1.57 4403.20 4397.60 26.82
11/24/2010 1.57 4403.20 4397.60 26.80
11/25/2010 1.57 4403.20 4397.60 26.79
11/25/2010 1.57 4403.20 4397.70 26.77
11/26/2010 1.57 4403.20 4397.70 26.76
11/26/2010 1.57 4403.30 4397.70 26.74
11/27/2010 1.58 4403.30 4397.70 26.73
11/28/2010 1.58 4403.30 4397.70 26.71
11/28/2010 1.58 4403.30 4397.70 26.70
11/29/2010 1.58 4403.30 4397.70 26.68
11/29/2010 1.58 4403.30 4397.80 26.67
11/30/2010 1.58 4403.30 4397.80 26.66
11/30/2010 1.58 4403.40 4397.80 26.64
12/1/2010 1.59 4403.40 4397.80 26.63
12/1/2010 1.59 4403.40 4397.80 26.61
12/2/2010 1.59 4403.40 4397.80 26.59
12/3/2010 1.59 4403.40 4397.80 26.58
12/3/2010 1.59 4403.40 4397.90 26.56
12/4/2010 1.59 4403.50 4397.90 26.54
12/4/2010 1.60 4403.50 4397.90 26.52
21 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
12/5/2010 1.60 4403.50 4397.90 26.51
12/5/2010 1.60 4403.50 4397.90 26.49
12/6/2010 1.60 4403.50 4397.90 26.47
12/6/2010 1.60 4403.50 4397.90 26.46
12/7/2010 1.60 4403.60 4398.00 26.44
12/8/2010 1.60 4403.60 4398.00 26.42
12/8/2010 1.61 4403.60 4398.00 26.41
12/9/2010 1.61 4403.60 4398.00 26.39
12/9/2010 1.61 4403.60 4398.00 26.37
12/10/2010 1.61 4403.60 4398.00 26.36
12/10/2010 1.61 4403.70 4398.00 26.34
12/11/2010 1.61 4403.70 4398.10 26.32
12/11/2010 1.62 4403.70 4398.10 26.31
12/12/2010 1.62 4403.70 4398.10 26.29
12/13/2010 1.62 4403.70 4398.10 26.27
12/13/2010 1.62 4403.70 4398.10 26.26
12/14/2010 1.62 4403.80 4398.10 26.24
12/14/2010 1.62 4403.80 4398.20 26.22
12/15/2010 1.62 4403.80 4398.20 26.21
12/15/2010 1.63 4403.80 4398.20 26.19
12/16/2010 1.63 4403.80 4398.20 26.17
12/16/2010 1.63 4403.80 4398.20 26.16
12/17/2010 1.63 4403.90 4398.20 26.14
12/18/2010 1.63 4403.90 4398.20 26.12
12/18/2010 1.63 4403.90 4398.30 26.10
12/19/2010 1.64 4403.90 4398.30 26.09
12/19/2010 1.64 4403.90 4398.30 26.07
12/20/2010 1.64 4403.90 4398.30 26.05
12/20/2010 1.64 4404.00 4398.30 26.04
12/21/2010 1.64 4404.00 4398.30 26.02
12/21/2010 1.64 4404.00 4398.30 26.00
12/22/2010 1.64 4404.00 4398.40 25.99
12/23/2010 1.65 4404.00 4398.40 25.97
12/23/2010 1.65 4404.00 4398.40 25.95
12/24/2010 1.65 4404.10 4398.40 25.94
12/24/2010 1.65 4404.10 4398.40 25.92
12/25/2010 1.65 4404.10 4398.40 25.90
12/25/2010 1.65 4404.10 4398.40 25.89
12/26/2010 1.65 4404.10 4398.50 25.87
12/26/2010 1.66 4404.10 4398.50 25.85
12/27/2010 1.66 4404.20 4398.50 25.84
12/28/2010 1.66 4404.20 4398.50 25.82
12/28/2010 1.66 4404.20 4398.50 25.80
12/29/2010 1.66 4404.20 4398.50 25.79
12/29/2010 1.66 4404.20 4398.60 25.77
12/30/2010 1.67 4404.20 4398.60 25.75
12/30/2010 1.67 4404.30 4398.60 25.74
12/31/2010 1.67 4404.30 4398.60 25.72
12/31/2010 1.67 4404.30 4398.60 25.70
1/1/2011 1.67 4404.30 4398.60 25.69
22 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
1/2/2011 1.67 4404.30 4398.60 25.67
1/2/2011 1.67 4404.40 4398.70 25.65
1/3/2011 1.68 4404.40 4398.70 25.63
1/3/2011 1.68 4404.40 4398.70 25.61
1/4/2011 1.68 4404.40 4398.70 25.60
1/4/2011 1.68 4404.40 4398.70 25.58
1/5/2011 1.68 4404.40 4398.70 25.56
1/5/2011 1.68 4404.50 4398.70 25.54
1/6/2011 1.69 4404.50 4398.80 25.52
1/7/2011 1.69 4404.50 4398.80 25.51
1/7/2011 1.69 4404.50 4398.80 25.49
1/8/2011 1.69 4404.50 4398.80 25.47
1/8/2011 1.69 4404.50 4398.80 25.45
1/9/2011 1.69 4404.60 4398.80 25.43
1/9/2011 1.69 4404.60 4398.80 25.42
1/10/2011 1.70 4404.60 4398.90 25.40
1/10/2011 1.70 4404.60 4398.90 25.38
1/11/2011 1.70 4404.60 4398.90 25.36
1/12/2011 1.70 4404.70 4398.90 25.35
1/12/2011 1.70 4404.70 4398.90 25.33
1/13/2011 1.70 4404.70 4398.90 25.31
1/13/2011 1.71 4404.70 4399.00 25.29
1/14/2011 1.71 4404.70 4399.00 25.27
1/14/2011 1.71 4404.70 4399.00 25.26
1/15/2011 1.71 4404.80 4399.00 25.24
1/15/2011 1.71 4404.80 4399.00 25.22
1/16/2011 1.71 4404.80 4399.00 25.20
1/17/2011 1.71 4404.80 4399.00 25.18
1/17/2011 1.72 4404.80 4399.10 25.17
1/18/2011 1.72 4404.90 4399.10 25.15
1/18/2011 1.72 4404.90 4399.10 25.13
1/19/2011 1.72 4404.90 4399.10 25.11
1/19/2011 1.72 4404.90 4399.10 25.10
1/20/2011 1.72 4404.90 4399.10 25.08
1/20/2011 1.72 4404.90 4399.10 25.06
1/21/2011 1.73 4405.00 4399.20 25.04
1/22/2011 1.73 4405.00 4399.20 25.02
1/22/2011 1.73 4405.00 4399.20 25.01
1/23/2011 1.73 4405.00 4399.20 24.99
1/23/2011 1.73 4405.00 4399.20 24.97
1/24/2011 1.73 4405.00 4399.20 24.95
1/24/2011 1.74 4405.10 4399.20 24.93
1/25/2011 1.74 4405.10 4399.30 24.92
1/25/2011 1.74 4405.10 4399.30 24.90
1/26/2011 1.74 4405.10 4399.30 24.88
1/27/2011 1.74 4405.10 4399.30 24.86
1/27/2011 1.74 4405.20 4399.30 24.84
1/28/2011 1.74 4405.20 4399.30 24.83
1/28/2011 1.75 4405.20 4399.40 24.81
1/29/2011 1.75 4405.20 4399.40 24.79
23 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
1/29/2011 1.75 4405.20 4399.40 24.77
1/30/2011 1.75 4405.20 4399.40 24.76
1/30/2011 1.75 4405.30 4399.40 24.74
1/31/2011 1.75 4405.30 4399.40 24.72
2/1/2011 1.76 4405.30 4399.40 24.70
2/1/2011 1.76 4405.30 4399.50 24.68
2/2/2011 1.76 4405.30 4399.50 24.67
2/2/2011 1.76 4405.40 4399.50 24.65
2/3/2011 1.76 4405.40 4399.50 24.63
2/3/2011 1.76 4405.40 4399.50 24.61
2/4/2011 1.76 4405.40 4399.50 24.59
2/4/2011 1.77 4405.40 4399.50 24.58
2/5/2011 1.77 4405.40 4399.60 24.56
2/6/2011 1.77 4405.50 4399.60 24.54
2/6/2011 1.77 4405.50 4399.60 24.52
2/7/2011 1.77 4405.50 4399.60 24.50
2/7/2011 1.77 4405.50 4399.60 24.49
2/8/2011 1.77 4405.50 4399.60 24.47
2/8/2011 1.78 4405.60 4399.60 24.45
2/9/2011 1.78 4405.60 4399.70 24.43
2/9/2011 1.78 4405.60 4399.70 24.41
2/10/2011 1.78 4405.60 4399.70 24.40
2/11/2011 1.78 4405.60 4399.70 24.38
2/11/2011 1.78 4405.60 4399.70 24.36
2/12/2011 1.79 4405.70 4399.70 24.34
2/12/2011 1.79 4405.70 4399.80 24.32
2/13/2011 1.79 4405.70 4399.80 24.31
2/13/2011 1.79 4405.70 4399.80 24.29
2/14/2011 1.79 4405.70 4399.80 24.27
2/14/2011 1.79 4405.70 4399.80 24.25
2/15/2011 1.79 4405.80 4399.80 24.23
2/16/2011 1.80 4405.80 4399.80 24.22
2/16/2011 1.80 4405.80 4399.90 24.20
2/17/2011 1.80 4405.80 4399.90 24.18
2/17/2011 1.80 4405.80 4399.90 24.16
2/18/2011 1.80 4405.90 4399.90 24.14
2/18/2011 1.80 4405.90 4399.90 24.13
2/19/2011 1.81 4405.90 4399.90 24.11
2/19/2011 1.81 4405.90 4399.90 24.09
2/20/2011 1.81 4405.90 4400.00 24.07
2/21/2011 1.81 4405.90 4400.00 24.05
2/21/2011 1.81 4406.00 4400.00 24.04
2/22/2011 1.81 4406.00 4400.00 24.02
2/22/2011 1.81 4406.00 4400.00 24.00
2/23/2011 1.82 4406.00 4400.00 23.98
2/23/2011 1.82 4406.00 4400.00 23.96
2/24/2011 1.82 4406.10 4400.00 23.95
2/24/2011 1.82 4406.10 4400.10 23.93
2/25/2011 1.82 4406.10 4400.10 23.91
2/26/2011 1.82 4406.10 4400.10 23.89
24 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
2/26/2011 1.83 4406.10 4400.10 23.87
2/27/2011 1.83 4406.10 4400.10 23.86
2/27/2011 1.83 4406.20 4400.10 23.84
2/28/2011 1.83 4406.20 4400.10 23.82
2/28/2011 1.83 4406.20 4400.10 23.80
3/1/2011 1.83 4406.20 4400.20 23.78
3/1/2011 1.83 4406.20 4400.20 23.77
3/2/2011 1.84 4406.30 4400.20 23.75
3/3/2011 1.84 4406.30 4400.20 23.73
3/3/2011 1.84 4406.30 4400.20 23.71
3/4/2011 1.84 4406.30 4400.20 23.69
3/4/2011 1.84 4406.30 4400.20 23.67
3/5/2011 1.84 4406.30 4400.20 23.65
3/5/2011 1.84 4406.40 4400.20 23.64
3/6/2011 1.85 4406.40 4400.30 23.62
3/6/2011 1.85 4406.40 4400.30 23.60
3/7/2011 1.85 4406.40 4400.30 23.58
3/8/2011 1.85 4406.40 4400.30 23.56
3/8/2011 1.85 4406.50 4400.30 23.54
3/9/2011 1.85 4406.50 4400.30 23.52
3/9/2011 1.86 4406.50 4400.30 23.51
3/10/2011 1.86 4406.50 4400.30 23.49
3/10/2011 1.86 4406.50 4400.40 23.47
3/11/2011 1.86 4406.60 4400.40 23.45
3/11/2011 1.86 4406.60 4400.40 23.43
3/12/2011 1.86 4406.60 4400.40 23.41
3/13/2011 1.86 4406.60 4400.40 23.39
3/13/2011 1.87 4406.60 4400.40 23.37
3/14/2011 1.87 4406.60 4400.40 23.36
3/14/2011 1.87 4406.70 4400.40 23.34
3/15/2011 1.87 4406.70 4400.40 23.32
3/15/2011 1.87 4406.70 4400.50 23.30
3/16/2011 1.87 4406.70 4400.50 23.28
3/16/2011 1.88 4406.70 4400.50 23.26
3/17/2011 1.88 4406.80 4400.50 23.24
3/18/2011 1.88 4406.80 4400.50 23.23
3/18/2011 1.88 4406.80 4400.50 23.21
3/19/2011 1.88 4406.80 4400.50 23.19
3/19/2011 1.88 4406.80 4400.50 23.17
3/20/2011 1.88 4406.80 4400.50 23.15
3/20/2011 1.89 4406.90 4400.60 23.13
3/21/2011 1.89 4406.90 4400.60 23.11
3/21/2011 1.89 4406.90 4400.60 23.10
3/22/2011 1.89 4406.90 4400.60 23.08
3/23/2011 1.89 4406.90 4400.60 23.06
3/23/2011 1.89 4407.00 4400.60 23.04
3/24/2011 1.90 4407.00 4400.60 23.02
3/24/2011 1.90 4407.00 4400.60 23.00
3/25/2011 1.90 4407.00 4400.70 22.98
3/25/2011 1.90 4407.00 4400.70 22.97
25 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
3/26/2011 1.90 4407.10 4400.70 22.95
3/26/2011 1.90 4407.10 4400.70 22.93
3/27/2011 1.90 4407.10 4400.70 22.91
3/28/2011 1.91 4407.10 4400.70 22.89
3/28/2011 1.91 4407.10 4400.70 22.87
3/29/2011 1.91 4407.10 4400.70 22.85
3/29/2011 1.91 4407.20 4400.70 22.84
3/30/2011 1.91 4407.20 4400.80 22.82
3/30/2011 1.91 4407.20 4400.80 22.80
3/31/2011 1.91 4407.20 4400.80 22.78
3/31/2011 1.92 4407.20 4400.80 22.76
4/1/2011 1.92 4407.30 4400.80 22.74
4/2/2011 1.92 4407.30 4400.80 22.73
4/2/2011 1.92 4407.30 4400.80 22.71
4/3/2011 1.92 4407.30 4400.80 22.69
4/3/2011 1.92 4407.30 4400.80 22.68
4/4/2011 1.93 4407.30 4400.90 22.66
4/4/2011 1.93 4407.40 4400.90 22.64
4/5/2011 1.93 4407.40 4400.90 22.63
4/5/2011 1.93 4407.40 4400.90 22.61
4/6/2011 1.93 4407.40 4400.90 22.59
4/7/2011 1.93 4407.40 4400.90 22.58
4/7/2011 1.93 4407.40 4400.90 22.56
4/8/2011 1.94 4407.50 4400.90 22.54
4/8/2011 1.94 4407.50 4401.00 22.53
4/9/2011 1.94 4407.50 4401.00 22.51
4/9/2011 1.94 4407.50 4401.00 22.50
4/10/2011 1.94 4407.50 4401.00 22.48
4/10/2011 1.94 4407.50 4401.00 22.46
4/11/2011 1.95 4407.60 4401.00 22.45
4/12/2011 1.95 4407.60 4401.00 22.43
4/12/2011 1.95 4407.60 4401.00 22.41
4/13/2011 1.95 4407.60 4401.00 22.40
4/13/2011 1.95 4407.60 4401.10 22.38
4/14/2011 1.95 4407.60 4401.10 22.36
4/14/2011 1.95 4407.70 4401.10 22.35
4/15/2011 1.96 4407.70 4401.10 22.33
4/15/2011 1.96 4407.70 4401.10 22.31
4/16/2011 1.96 4407.70 4401.10 22.30
4/17/2011 1.96 4407.70 4401.10 22.28
4/17/2011 1.96 4407.70 4401.10 22.26
4/18/2011 1.96 4407.80 4401.20 22.25
4/18/2011 1.97 4407.80 4401.20 22.23
4/19/2011 1.97 4407.80 4401.20 22.21
4/19/2011 1.97 4407.80 4401.20 22.20
4/20/2011 1.97 4407.80 4401.20 22.18
4/20/2011 1.97 4407.80 4401.20 22.16
4/21/2011 1.97 4407.90 4401.20 22.15
4/22/2011 1.97 4407.90 4401.20 22.13
4/22/2011 1.98 4407.90 4401.20 22.12
26 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
4/23/2011 1.98 4407.90 4401.30 22.10
4/23/2011 1.98 4407.90 4401.30 22.08
4/24/2011 1.98 4407.90 4401.30 22.07
4/24/2011 1.98 4408.00 4401.30 22.05
4/25/2011 1.98 4408.00 4401.30 22.03
4/25/2011 1.98 4408.00 4401.30 22.02
4/26/2011 1.99 4408.00 4401.30 22.00
4/27/2011 1.99 4408.00 4401.30 21.98
4/27/2011 1.99 4408.00 4401.30 21.97
4/28/2011 1.99 4408.00 4401.40 21.95
4/28/2011 1.99 4408.10 4401.40 21.93
4/29/2011 1.99 4408.10 4401.40 21.92
4/29/2011 2.00 4408.10 4401.40 21.90
4/30/2011 2.00 4408.10 4401.40 21.88
4/30/2011 2.00 4408.10 4401.40 21.87
5/1/2011 2.00 4408.10 4401.40 21.85
5/2/2011 2.00 4408.20 4401.40 21.84
5/2/2011 2.00 4408.20 4401.50 21.82
5/3/2011 2.00 4408.20 4401.50 21.80
5/3/2011 2.01 4408.20 4401.50 21.79
5/4/2011 2.01 4408.20 4401.50 21.77
5/4/2011 2.01 4408.20 4401.50 21.76
5/5/2011 2.01 4408.30 4401.50 21.74
5/5/2011 2.01 4408.30 4401.50 21.72
5/6/2011 2.01 4408.30 4401.50 21.71
5/7/2011 2.02 4408.30 4401.50 21.69
5/7/2011 2.02 4408.30 4401.60 21.68
5/8/2011 2.02 4408.30 4401.60 21.66
5/8/2011 2.02 4408.40 4401.60 21.65
5/9/2011 2.02 4408.40 4401.60 21.63
5/9/2011 2.02 4408.40 4401.60 21.61
5/10/2011 2.02 4408.40 4401.60 21.60
5/10/2011 2.03 4408.40 4401.60 21.58
5/11/2011 2.03 4408.40 4401.60 21.57
5/12/2011 2.03 4408.50 4401.60 21.55
5/12/2011 2.03 4408.50 4401.70 21.53
5/13/2011 2.03 4408.50 4401.70 21.52
5/13/2011 2.03 4408.50 4401.70 21.50
5/14/2011 2.04 4408.50 4401.70 21.49
5/14/2011 2.04 4408.50 4401.70 21.47
5/15/2011 2.04 4408.50 4401.70 21.46
5/15/2011 2.04 4408.60 4401.70 21.44
5/16/2011 2.04 4408.60 4401.70 21.42
5/17/2011 2.04 4408.60 4401.80 21.41
5/17/2011 2.04 4408.60 4401.80 21.39
5/18/2011 2.05 4408.60 4401.80 21.38
5/18/2011 2.05 4408.60 4401.80 21.36
5/19/2011 2.05 4408.70 4401.80 21.34
5/19/2011 2.05 4408.70 4401.80 21.33
5/20/2011 2.05 4408.70 4401.80 21.31
27 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
5/20/2011 2.05 4408.70 4401.80 21.30
5/21/2011 2.05 4408.70 4401.80 21.28
5/22/2011 2.06 4408.70 4401.90 21.27
5/22/2011 2.06 4408.80 4401.90 21.25
5/23/2011 2.06 4408.80 4401.90 21.23
5/23/2011 2.06 4408.80 4401.90 21.22
5/24/2011 2.06 4408.80 4401.90 21.20
5/24/2011 2.06 4408.80 4401.90 21.19
5/25/2011 2.07 4408.80 4401.90 21.17
5/25/2011 2.07 4408.80 4401.90 21.15
5/26/2011 2.07 4408.90 4402.00 21.14
5/27/2011 2.07 4408.90 4402.00 21.12
5/27/2011 2.07 4408.90 4402.00 21.11
5/28/2011 2.07 4408.90 4402.00 21.09
5/28/2011 2.07 4408.90 4402.00 21.08
5/29/2011 2.08 4408.90 4402.00 21.06
5/29/2011 2.08 4409.00 4402.00 21.04
5/30/2011 2.08 4409.00 4402.00 21.03
5/30/2011 2.08 4409.00 4402.00 21.01
5/31/2011 2.08 4409.00 4402.10 21.00
6/1/2011 2.08 4409.00 4402.10 20.98
6/1/2011 2.09 4409.00 4402.10 20.97
6/2/2011 2.09 4409.00 4402.10 20.95
6/2/2011 2.09 4409.10 4402.10 20.94
6/3/2011 2.09 4409.10 4402.10 20.93
6/3/2011 2.09 4409.10 4402.10 20.91
6/4/2011 2.09 4409.10 4402.10 20.90
6/4/2011 2.09 4409.10 4402.10 20.88
6/5/2011 2.10 4409.10 4402.20 20.87
6/6/2011 2.10 4409.10 4402.20 20.86
6/6/2011 2.10 4409.20 4402.20 20.84
6/7/2011 2.10 4409.20 4402.20 20.83
6/7/2011 2.10 4409.20 4402.20 20.82
6/8/2011 2.10 4409.20 4402.20 20.80
6/8/2011 2.11 4409.20 4402.20 20.79
6/9/2011 2.11 4409.20 4402.20 20.77
6/9/2011 2.11 4409.20 4402.30 20.76
6/10/2011 2.11 4409.30 4402.30 20.75
6/11/2011 2.11 4409.30 4402.30 20.73
6/11/2011 2.11 4409.30 4402.30 20.72
6/12/2011 2.11 4409.30 4402.30 20.71
6/12/2011 2.12 4409.30 4402.30 20.69
6/13/2011 2.12 4409.30 4402.30 20.68
6/13/2011 2.12 4409.30 4402.30 20.67
6/14/2011 2.12 4409.30 4402.30 20.65
6/14/2011 2.12 4409.40 4402.40 20.64
6/15/2011 2.12 4409.40 4402.40 20.62
6/16/2011 2.12 4409.40 4402.40 20.61
6/16/2011 2.13 4409.40 4402.40 20.60
6/17/2011 2.13 4409.40 4402.40 20.58
28 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
6/17/2011 2.13 4409.40 4402.40 20.57
6/18/2011 2.13 4409.40 4402.40 20.56
6/18/2011 2.13 4409.50 4402.40 20.54
6/19/2011 2.13 4409.50 4402.50 20.53
6/19/2011 2.14 4409.50 4402.50 20.52
6/20/2011 2.14 4409.50 4402.50 20.50
6/21/2011 2.14 4409.50 4402.50 20.49
6/21/2011 2.14 4409.50 4402.50 20.47
6/22/2011 2.14 4409.50 4402.50 20.46
6/22/2011 2.14 4409.60 4402.50 20.45
6/23/2011 2.14 4409.60 4402.50 20.43
6/23/2011 2.15 4409.60 4402.50 20.42
6/24/2011 2.15 4409.60 4402.60 20.41
6/24/2011 2.15 4409.60 4402.60 20.39
6/25/2011 2.15 4409.60 4402.60 20.38
6/26/2011 2.15 4409.60 4402.60 20.36
6/26/2011 2.15 4409.60 4402.60 20.35
6/27/2011 2.16 4409.70 4402.60 20.34
6/27/2011 2.16 4409.70 4402.60 20.32
6/28/2011 2.16 4409.70 4402.60 20.31
6/28/2011 2.16 4409.70 4402.60 20.30
6/29/2011 2.16 4409.70 4402.70 20.28
6/29/2011 2.16 4409.70 4402.70 20.27
6/30/2011 2.16 4409.70 4402.70 20.26
7/1/2011 2.17 4409.80 4402.70 20.24
7/1/2011 2.17 4409.80 4402.70 20.23
7/2/2011 2.17 4409.80 4402.70 20.22
7/2/2011 2.17 4409.80 4402.70 20.21
7/3/2011 2.17 4409.80 4402.70 20.20
7/3/2011 2.17 4409.80 4402.80 20.20
7/4/2011 2.17 4409.80 4402.80 20.19
7/4/2011 2.18 4409.80 4402.80 20.18
7/5/2011 2.18 4409.80 4402.80 20.17
7/6/2011 2.18 4409.80 4402.80 20.16
7/6/2011 2.18 4409.90 4402.80 20.15
7/7/2011 2.18 4409.90 4402.80 20.14
7/7/2011 2.18 4409.90 4402.80 20.13
7/8/2011 2.19 4409.90 4402.80 20.12
7/8/2011 2.19 4409.90 4402.90 20.11
7/9/2011 2.19 4409.90 4402.90 20.10
7/9/2011 2.19 4409.90 4402.90 20.09
7/10/2011 2.19 4409.90 4402.90 20.08
7/11/2011 2.19 4409.90 4402.90 20.07
7/11/2011 2.19 4409.90 4402.90 20.06
7/12/2011 2.20 4409.90 4402.90 20.05
7/12/2011 2.20 4410.00 4402.90 20.04
7/13/2011 2.20 4410.00 4402.90 20.04
7/13/2011 2.20 4410.00 4403.00 20.03
7/14/2011 2.20 4410.00 4403.00 20.02
7/14/2011 2.20 4410.00 4403.00 20.01
29 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
7/15/2011 2.21 4410.00 4403.00 20.00
7/16/2011 2.21 4410.00 4403.00 19.99
7/16/2011 2.21 4410.00 4403.00 19.98
7/17/2011 2.21 4410.00 4403.00 19.97
7/17/2011 2.21 4410.00 4403.00 19.97
7/18/2011 2.21 4410.00 4403.10 19.96
7/18/2011 2.21 4410.10 4403.10 19.95
7/19/2011 2.22 4410.10 4403.10 19.94
7/19/2011 2.22 4410.10 4403.10 19.93
7/20/2011 2.22 4410.10 4403.10 19.92
7/21/2011 2.22 4410.10 4403.10 19.92
7/21/2011 2.22 4410.10 4403.10 19.91
7/22/2011 2.22 4410.10 4403.10 19.90
7/22/2011 2.23 4410.10 4403.10 19.89
7/23/2011 2.23 4410.10 4403.20 19.88
7/23/2011 2.23 4410.10 4403.20 19.87
7/24/2011 2.23 4410.10 4403.20 19.87
7/24/2011 2.23 4410.10 4403.20 19.86
7/25/2011 2.23 4410.20 4403.20 19.85
7/26/2011 2.23 4410.20 4403.20 19.84
7/26/2011 2.24 4410.20 4403.20 19.83
7/27/2011 2.24 4410.20 4403.20 19.83
7/27/2011 2.24 4410.20 4403.30 19.82
7/28/2011 2.24 4410.20 4403.30 19.81
7/28/2011 2.24 4410.20 4403.30 19.80
7/29/2011 2.24 4410.20 4403.30 19.79
7/29/2011 2.24 4410.20 4403.30 19.78
7/30/2011 2.25 4410.20 4403.30 19.78
7/31/2011 2.25 4410.20 4403.30 19.77
7/31/2011 2.25 4410.20 4403.30 19.76
8/1/2011 2.25 4410.20 4403.30 19.75
8/1/2011 2.25 4410.30 4403.40 19.74
8/2/2011 2.25 4410.30 4403.40 19.73
8/2/2011 2.26 4410.30 4403.40 19.73
8/3/2011 2.26 4410.30 4403.40 19.72
8/3/2011 2.26 4410.30 4403.40 19.71
8/4/2011 2.26 4410.30 4403.40 19.70
8/5/2011 2.26 4410.30 4403.40 19.69
8/5/2011 2.26 4410.30 4403.40 19.68
8/6/2011 2.26 4410.30 4403.40 19.68
8/6/2011 2.27 4410.30 4403.50 19.67
8/7/2011 2.27 4410.30 4403.50 19.66
8/7/2011 2.27 4410.30 4403.50 19.65
8/8/2011 2.27 4410.40 4403.50 19.64
8/8/2011 2.27 4410.40 4403.50 19.63
8/9/2011 2.27 4410.40 4403.50 19.63
8/10/2011 2.28 4410.40 4403.50 19.62
8/10/2011 2.28 4410.40 4403.50 19.61
8/11/2011 2.28 4410.40 4403.60 19.60
8/11/2011 2.28 4410.40 4403.60 19.59
30 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
8/12/2011 2.28 4410.40 4403.60 19.58
8/12/2011 2.28 4410.40 4403.60 19.58
8/13/2011 2.28 4410.40 4403.60 19.57
8/13/2011 2.29 4410.40 4403.60 19.56
8/14/2011 2.29 4410.40 4403.60 19.55
8/15/2011 2.29 4410.50 4403.60 19.54
8/15/2011 2.29 4410.50 4403.60 19.53
8/16/2011 2.29 4410.50 4403.70 19.53
8/16/2011 2.29 4410.50 4403.70 19.52
8/17/2011 2.30 4410.50 4403.70 19.51
8/17/2011 2.30 4410.50 4403.70 19.50
8/18/2011 2.30 4410.50 4403.70 19.49
8/18/2011 2.30 4410.50 4403.70 19.48
8/19/2011 2.30 4410.50 4403.70 19.48
8/20/2011 2.30 4410.50 4403.70 19.47
8/20/2011 2.30 4410.50 4403.80 19.46
8/21/2011 2.31 4410.50 4403.80 19.45
8/21/2011 2.31 4410.60 4403.80 19.44
8/22/2011 2.31 4410.60 4403.80 19.43
8/22/2011 2.31 4410.60 4403.80 19.43
8/23/2011 2.31 4410.60 4403.80 19.42
8/23/2011 2.31 4410.60 4403.80 19.41
8/24/2011 2.31 4410.60 4403.80 19.40
8/25/2011 2.32 4410.60 4403.80 19.39
8/25/2011 2.32 4410.60 4403.90 19.38
8/26/2011 2.32 4410.60 4403.90 19.38
8/26/2011 2.32 4410.60 4403.90 19.37
8/27/2011 2.32 4410.60 4403.90 19.36
8/27/2011 2.32 4410.60 4403.90 19.35
8/28/2011 2.33 4410.70 4403.90 19.34
8/28/2011 2.33 4410.70 4403.90 19.33
8/29/2011 2.33 4410.70 4403.90 19.33
8/30/2011 2.33 4410.70 4403.90 19.32
8/30/2011 2.33 4410.70 4404.00 19.31
8/31/2011 2.33 4410.70 4404.00 19.30
8/31/2011 2.33 4410.70 4404.00 19.29
9/1/2011 2.34 4410.70 4404.00 19.28
9/1/2011 2.34 4410.70 4404.00 19.28
9/2/2011 2.34 4410.70 4404.00 19.27
9/2/2011 2.34 4410.70 4404.00 19.26
9/3/2011 2.34 4410.70 4404.00 19.25
9/4/2011 2.34 4410.80 4404.10 19.24
9/4/2011 2.35 4410.80 4404.10 19.23
9/5/2011 2.35 4410.80 4404.10 19.23
9/5/2011 2.35 4410.80 4404.10 19.22
9/6/2011 2.35 4410.80 4404.10 19.21
9/6/2011 2.35 4410.80 4404.10 19.20
9/7/2011 2.35 4410.80 4404.10 19.19
9/7/2011 2.35 4410.80 4404.10 19.18
9/8/2011 2.36 4410.80 4404.10 19.18
31 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
9/9/2011 2.36 4410.80 4404.20 19.17
9/9/2011 2.36 4410.80 4404.20 19.16
9/10/2011 2.36 4410.90 4404.20 19.15
9/10/2011 2.36 4410.90 4404.20 19.14
9/11/2011 2.36 4410.90 4404.20 19.13
9/11/2011 2.37 4410.90 4404.20 19.12
9/12/2011 2.37 4410.90 4404.20 19.12
9/12/2011 2.37 4410.90 4404.20 19.11
9/13/2011 2.37 4410.90 4404.20 19.10
9/14/2011 2.37 4410.90 4404.30 19.09
9/14/2011 2.37 4410.90 4404.30 19.08
9/15/2011 2.37 4410.90 4404.30 19.07
9/15/2011 2.38 4410.90 4404.30 19.07
9/16/2011 2.38 4410.90 4404.30 19.06
9/16/2011 2.38 4411.00 4404.30 19.05
9/17/2011 2.38 4411.00 4404.30 19.04
9/17/2011 2.38 4411.00 4404.30 19.03
9/18/2011 2.38 4411.00 4404.40 19.02
9/19/2011 2.38 4411.00 4404.40 19.02
9/19/2011 2.39 4411.00 4404.40 19.01
9/20/2011 2.39 4411.00 4404.40 19.00
9/20/2011 2.39 4411.00 4404.40 18.99
9/21/2011 2.39 4411.00 4404.40 18.98
9/21/2011 2.39 4411.00 4404.40 18.97
9/22/2011 2.39 4411.00 4404.40 18.97
9/22/2011 2.40 4411.00 4404.40 18.96
9/23/2011 2.40 4411.10 4404.50 18.95
9/24/2011 2.40 4411.10 4404.50 18.94
9/24/2011 2.40 4411.10 4404.50 18.93
9/25/2011 2.40 4411.10 4404.50 18.92
9/25/2011 2.40 4411.10 4404.50 18.92
9/26/2011 2.40 4411.10 4404.50 18.91
9/26/2011 2.41 4411.10 4404.50 18.90
9/27/2011 2.41 4411.10 4404.50 18.89
9/27/2011 2.41 4411.10 4404.50 18.88
9/28/2011 2.41 4411.10 4404.60 18.87
9/29/2011 2.41 4411.10 4404.60 18.87
9/29/2011 2.41 4411.10 4404.60 18.86
9/30/2011 2.42 4411.20 4404.60 18.85
9/30/2011 2.42 4411.20 4404.60 18.84
10/1/2011 2.42 4411.20 4404.60 18.83
10/1/2011 2.42 4411.20 4404.60 18.82
10/2/2011 2.42 4411.20 4404.60 18.81
10/2/2011 2.42 4411.20 4404.70 18.80
10/3/2011 2.42 4411.20 4404.70 18.79
10/4/2011 2.43 4411.20 4404.70 18.78
10/4/2011 2.43 4411.20 4404.70 18.77
10/5/2011 2.43 4411.20 4404.70 18.76
10/5/2011 2.43 4411.20 4404.70 18.75
10/6/2011 2.43 4411.30 4404.70 18.74
32 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
10/6/2011 2.43 4411.30 4404.70 18.73
10/7/2011 2.44 4411.30 4404.70 18.72
10/7/2011 2.44 4411.30 4404.80 18.71
10/8/2011 2.44 4411.30 4404.80 18.70
10/9/2011 2.44 4411.30 4404.80 18.69
10/9/2011 2.44 4411.30 4404.80 18.68
10/10/2011 2.44 4411.30 4404.80 18.67
10/10/2011 2.44 4411.30 4404.80 18.66
10/11/2011 2.45 4411.30 4404.80 18.65
10/11/2011 2.45 4411.40 4404.80 18.64
10/12/2011 2.45 4411.40 4404.90 18.63
10/12/2011 2.45 4411.40 4404.90 18.62
10/13/2011 2.45 4411.40 4404.90 18.61
10/14/2011 2.45 4411.40 4404.90 18.60
10/14/2011 2.45 4411.40 4404.90 18.59
10/15/2011 2.46 4411.40 4404.90 18.58
10/15/2011 2.46 4411.40 4404.90 18.57
10/16/2011 2.46 4411.40 4404.90 18.56
10/16/2011 2.46 4411.40 4404.90 18.55
10/17/2011 2.46 4411.50 4405.00 18.54
10/17/2011 2.46 4411.50 4405.00 18.53
10/18/2011 2.47 4411.50 4405.00 18.52
10/19/2011 2.47 4411.50 4405.00 18.51
10/19/2011 2.47 4411.50 4405.00 18.50
10/20/2011 2.47 4411.50 4405.00 18.49
10/20/2011 2.47 4411.50 4405.00 18.48
10/21/2011 2.47 4411.50 4405.00 18.47
10/21/2011 2.47 4411.50 4405.00 18.46
10/22/2011 2.48 4411.50 4405.10 18.45
10/22/2011 2.48 4411.60 4405.10 18.44
10/23/2011 2.48 4411.60 4405.10 18.43
10/24/2011 2.48 4411.60 4405.10 18.42
10/24/2011 2.48 4411.60 4405.10 18.41
10/25/2011 2.48 4411.60 4405.10 18.40
10/25/2011 2.49 4411.60 4405.10 18.39
10/26/2011 2.49 4411.60 4405.10 18.38
10/26/2011 2.49 4411.60 4405.20 18.37
10/27/2011 2.49 4411.60 4405.20 18.36
10/27/2011 2.49 4411.60 4405.20 18.35
10/28/2011 2.49 4411.70 4405.20 18.34
10/29/2011 2.49 4411.70 4405.20 18.33
10/29/2011 2.50 4411.70 4405.20 18.32
10/30/2011 2.50 4411.70 4405.20 18.31
10/30/2011 2.50 4411.70 4405.20 18.30
10/31/2011 2.50 4411.70 4405.20 18.29
10/31/2011 2.50 4411.70 4405.30 18.29
11/1/2011 2.50 4411.70 4405.30 18.28
11/1/2011 2.51 4411.70 4405.30 18.26
11/2/2011 2.51 4411.70 4405.30 18.25
11/3/2011 2.51 4411.80 4405.30 18.24
33 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
11/3/2011 2.51 4411.80 4405.30 18.23
11/4/2011 2.51 4411.80 4405.30 18.22
11/4/2011 2.51 4411.80 4405.30 18.20
11/5/2011 2.51 4411.80 4405.40 18.19
11/5/2011 2.52 4411.80 4405.40 18.18
11/6/2011 2.52 4411.80 4405.40 18.17
11/6/2011 2.52 4411.80 4405.40 18.15
11/7/2011 2.52 4411.90 4405.40 18.14
11/8/2011 2.52 4411.90 4405.40 18.13
11/8/2011 2.52 4411.90 4405.40 18.12
11/9/2011 2.52 4411.90 4405.40 18.11
11/9/2011 2.53 4411.90 4405.40 18.09
11/10/2011 2.53 4411.90 4405.50 18.08
11/10/2011 2.53 4411.90 4405.50 18.07
11/11/2011 2.53 4411.90 4405.50 18.06
11/11/2011 2.53 4412.00 4405.50 18.05
11/12/2011 2.53 4412.00 4405.50 18.03
11/13/2011 2.54 4412.00 4405.50 18.02
11/13/2011 2.54 4412.00 4405.50 18.01
11/14/2011 2.54 4412.00 4405.50 18.00
11/14/2011 2.54 4412.00 4405.50 17.99
11/15/2011 2.54 4412.00 4405.60 17.97
11/15/2011 2.54 4412.00 4405.60 17.96
11/16/2011 2.54 4412.00 4405.60 17.95
11/16/2011 2.55 4412.10 4405.60 17.94
11/17/2011 2.55 4412.10 4405.60 17.93
11/18/2011 2.55 4412.10 4405.60 17.92
11/18/2011 2.55 4412.10 4405.60 17.90
11/19/2011 2.55 4412.10 4405.60 17.89
11/19/2011 2.55 4412.10 4405.70 17.88
11/20/2011 2.56 4412.10 4405.70 17.87
11/20/2011 2.56 4412.10 4405.70 17.86
11/21/2011 2.56 4412.20 4405.70 17.84
11/21/2011 2.56 4412.20 4405.70 17.83
11/22/2011 2.56 4412.20 4405.70 17.82
11/23/2011 2.56 4412.20 4405.70 17.81
11/23/2011 2.56 4412.20 4405.70 17.80
11/24/2011 2.57 4412.20 4405.70 17.78
11/24/2011 2.57 4412.20 4405.80 17.77
11/25/2011 2.57 4412.20 4405.80 17.76
11/25/2011 2.57 4412.30 4405.80 17.75
11/26/2011 2.57 4412.30 4405.80 17.74
11/26/2011 2.57 4412.30 4405.80 17.72
11/27/2011 2.57 4412.30 4405.80 17.71
11/28/2011 2.58 4412.30 4405.80 17.70
11/28/2011 2.58 4412.30 4405.80 17.69
11/29/2011 2.58 4412.30 4405.80 17.68
11/29/2011 2.58 4412.30 4405.90 17.66
11/30/2011 2.58 4412.30 4405.90 17.65
11/30/2011 2.58 4412.40 4405.90 17.64
34 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
12/1/2011 2.59 4412.40 4405.90 17.63
12/1/2011 2.59 4412.40 4405.90 17.61
12/2/2011 2.59 4412.40 4405.90 17.60
12/3/2011 2.59 4412.40 4405.90 17.59
12/3/2011 2.59 4412.40 4405.90 17.57
12/4/2011 2.59 4412.40 4406.00 17.56
12/4/2011 2.59 4412.50 4406.00 17.54
12/5/2011 2.60 4412.50 4406.00 17.53
12/5/2011 2.60 4412.50 4406.00 17.51
12/6/2011 2.60 4412.50 4406.00 17.50
12/6/2011 2.60 4412.50 4406.00 17.49
12/7/2011 2.60 4412.50 4406.00 17.47
12/8/2011 2.60 4412.50 4406.00 17.46
12/8/2011 2.61 4412.60 4406.00 17.44
12/9/2011 2.61 4412.60 4406.10 17.43
12/9/2011 2.61 4412.60 4406.10 17.42
12/10/2011 2.61 4412.60 4406.10 17.40
12/10/2011 2.61 4412.60 4406.10 17.39
12/11/2011 2.61 4412.60 4406.10 17.37
12/11/2011 2.61 4412.60 4406.10 17.36
12/12/2011 2.62 4412.70 4406.10 17.35
12/13/2011 2.62 4412.70 4406.10 17.33
12/13/2011 2.62 4412.70 4406.20 17.32
12/14/2011 2.62 4412.70 4406.20 17.30
12/14/2011 2.62 4412.70 4406.20 17.29
12/15/2011 2.62 4412.70 4406.20 17.27
12/15/2011 2.63 4412.70 4406.20 17.26
12/16/2011 2.63 4412.80 4406.20 17.25
12/16/2011 2.63 4412.80 4406.20 17.23
12/17/2011 2.63 4412.80 4406.20 17.22
12/18/2011 2.63 4412.80 4406.20 17.20
12/18/2011 2.63 4412.80 4406.30 17.19
12/19/2011 2.63 4412.80 4406.30 17.18
12/19/2011 2.64 4412.80 4406.30 17.16
12/20/2011 2.64 4412.90 4406.30 17.15
12/20/2011 2.64 4412.90 4406.30 17.13
12/21/2011 2.64 4412.90 4406.30 17.12
12/21/2011 2.64 4412.90 4406.30 17.11
12/22/2011 2.64 4412.90 4406.30 17.09
12/23/2011 2.64 4412.90 4406.30 17.08
12/23/2011 2.65 4412.90 4406.40 17.06
12/24/2011 2.65 4413.00 4406.40 17.05
12/24/2011 2.65 4413.00 4406.40 17.04
12/25/2011 2.65 4413.00 4406.40 17.02
12/25/2011 2.65 4413.00 4406.40 17.01
12/26/2011 2.65 4413.00 4406.40 16.99
12/26/2011 2.66 4413.00 4406.40 16.98
12/27/2011 2.66 4413.00 4406.40 16.96
12/28/2011 2.66 4413.00 4406.50 16.95
12/28/2011 2.66 4413.10 4406.50 16.94
35 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
12/29/2011 2.66 4413.10 4406.50 16.92
12/29/2011 2.66 4413.10 4406.50 16.91
12/30/2011 2.66 4413.10 4406.50 16.89
12/30/2011 2.67 4413.10 4406.50 16.88
12/31/2011 2.67 4413.10 4406.50 16.87
12/31/2011 2.67 4413.10 4406.50 16.85
1/1/2012 2.67 4413.20 4406.50 16.84
1/2/2012 2.67 4413.20 4406.60 16.82
1/2/2012 2.67 4413.20 4406.60 16.81
1/3/2012 2.68 4413.20 4406.60 16.79
1/3/2012 2.68 4413.20 4406.60 16.78
1/4/2012 2.68 4413.20 4406.60 16.76
1/4/2012 2.68 4413.30 4406.60 16.75
1/5/2012 2.68 4413.30 4406.60 16.73
1/5/2012 2.68 4413.30 4406.60 16.72
1/6/2012 2.68 4413.30 4406.70 16.70
1/7/2012 2.69 4413.30 4406.70 16.69
1/7/2012 2.69 4413.30 4406.70 16.67
1/8/2012 2.69 4413.30 4406.70 16.66
1/8/2012 2.69 4413.40 4406.70 16.64
1/9/2012 2.69 4413.40 4406.70 16.63
1/9/2012 2.69 4413.40 4406.70 16.61
1/10/2012 2.70 4413.40 4406.70 16.59
1/10/2012 2.70 4413.40 4406.70 16.58
1/11/2012 2.70 4413.40 4406.80 16.56
1/12/2012 2.70 4413.50 4406.80 16.55
1/12/2012 2.70 4413.50 4406.80 16.53
1/13/2012 2.70 4413.50 4406.80 16.52
1/13/2012 2.70 4413.50 4406.80 16.50
1/14/2012 2.71 4413.50 4406.80 16.49
1/14/2012 2.71 4413.50 4406.80 16.47
1/15/2012 2.71 4413.50 4406.80 16.46
1/15/2012 2.71 4413.60 4406.80 16.44
1/16/2012 2.71 4413.60 4406.90 16.43
1/17/2012 2.71 4413.60 4406.90 16.41
1/17/2012 2.71 4413.60 4406.90 16.40
1/18/2012 2.72 4413.60 4406.90 16.38
1/18/2012 2.72 4413.60 4406.90 16.37
1/19/2012 2.72 4413.60 4406.90 16.35
1/19/2012 2.72 4413.70 4406.90 16.34
1/20/2012 2.72 4413.70 4406.90 16.32
1/20/2012 2.72 4413.70 4407.00 16.31
1/21/2012 2.73 4413.70 4407.00 16.29
1/22/2012 2.73 4413.70 4407.00 16.28
1/22/2012 2.73 4413.70 4407.00 16.26
1/23/2012 2.73 4413.80 4407.00 16.25
1/23/2012 2.73 4413.80 4407.00 16.23
1/24/2012 2.73 4413.80 4407.00 16.22
1/24/2012 2.73 4413.80 4407.00 16.20
1/25/2012 2.74 4413.80 4407.00 16.18
36 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
1/25/2012 2.74 4413.80 4407.10 16.17
1/26/2012 2.74 4413.80 4407.10 16.15
1/27/2012 2.74 4413.90 4407.10 16.14
1/27/2012 2.74 4413.90 4407.10 16.12
1/28/2012 2.74 4413.90 4407.10 16.11
1/28/2012 2.75 4413.90 4407.10 16.09
1/29/2012 2.75 4413.90 4407.10 16.08
1/29/2012 2.75 4413.90 4407.10 16.06
1/30/2012 2.75 4414.00 4407.10 16.05
1/30/2012 2.75 4414.00 4407.20 16.03
1/31/2012 2.75 4414.00 4407.20 16.02
2/1/2012 2.75 4414.00 4407.20 16.00
2/1/2012 2.76 4414.00 4407.20 15.99
2/2/2012 2.76 4414.00 4407.20 15.97
2/2/2012 2.76 4414.00 4407.20 15.96
2/3/2012 2.76 4414.10 4407.20 15.94
2/3/2012 2.76 4414.10 4407.20 15.93
2/4/2012 2.76 4414.10 4407.30 15.91
2/4/2012 2.77 4414.10 4407.30 15.90
2/5/2012 2.77 4414.10 4407.30 15.88
2/6/2012 2.77 4414.10 4407.30 15.86
2/6/2012 2.77 4414.20 4407.30 15.85
2/7/2012 2.77 4414.20 4407.30 15.83
2/7/2012 2.77 4414.20 4407.30 15.82
2/8/2012 2.77 4414.20 4407.30 15.80
2/8/2012 2.78 4414.20 4407.30 15.79
2/9/2012 2.78 4414.20 4407.40 15.77
2/9/2012 2.78 4414.20 4407.40 15.76
2/10/2012 2.78 4414.30 4407.40 15.74
2/11/2012 2.78 4414.30 4407.40 15.73
2/11/2012 2.78 4414.30 4407.40 15.71
2/12/2012 2.78 4414.30 4407.40 15.70
2/12/2012 2.79 4414.30 4407.40 15.68
2/13/2012 2.79 4414.30 4407.40 15.67
2/13/2012 2.79 4414.40 4407.50 15.65
2/14/2012 2.79 4414.40 4407.50 15.63
2/14/2012 2.79 4414.40 4407.50 15.62
2/15/2012 2.79 4414.40 4407.50 15.60
2/16/2012 2.80 4414.40 4407.50 15.59
2/16/2012 2.80 4414.40 4407.50 15.57
2/17/2012 2.80 4414.40 4407.50 15.56
2/17/2012 2.80 4414.50 4407.50 15.54
2/18/2012 2.80 4414.50 4407.50 15.53
2/18/2012 2.80 4414.50 4407.60 15.51
2/19/2012 2.80 4414.50 4407.60 15.50
2/19/2012 2.81 4414.50 4407.60 15.48
2/20/2012 2.81 4414.50 4407.60 15.47
2/21/2012 2.81 4414.50 4407.60 15.45
2/21/2012 2.81 4414.60 4407.60 15.44
2/22/2012 2.81 4414.60 4407.60 15.42
37 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
2/22/2012 2.81 4414.60 4407.60 15.40
2/23/2012 2.82 4414.60 4407.60 15.39
2/23/2012 2.82 4414.60 4407.70 15.37
2/24/2012 2.82 4414.60 4407.70 15.36
2/24/2012 2.82 4414.70 4407.70 15.34
2/25/2012 2.82 4414.70 4407.70 15.33
2/26/2012 2.82 4414.70 4407.70 15.31
2/26/2012 2.82 4414.70 4407.70 15.30
2/27/2012 2.83 4414.70 4407.70 15.28
2/27/2012 2.83 4414.70 4407.70 15.27
2/28/2012 2.83 4414.70 4407.80 15.25
2/28/2012 2.83 4414.80 4407.80 15.24
2/29/2012 2.83 4414.80 4407.80 15.22
2/29/2012 2.83 4414.80 4407.80 15.21
3/1/2012 2.84 4414.80 4407.80 15.19
3/2/2012 2.84 4414.80 4407.80 15.17
3/2/2012 2.84 4414.80 4407.80 15.16
3/3/2012 2.84 4414.90 4407.80 15.14
3/3/2012 2.84 4414.90 4407.80 15.13
3/4/2012 2.84 4414.90 4407.90 15.11
3/4/2012 2.84 4414.90 4407.90 15.10
3/5/2012 2.85 4414.90 4407.90 15.08
3/5/2012 2.85 4414.90 4407.90 15.06
3/6/2012 2.85 4415.00 4407.90 15.05
3/7/2012 2.85 4415.00 4407.90 15.03
3/7/2012 2.85 4415.00 4407.90 15.02
3/8/2012 2.85 4415.00 4407.90 15.00
3/8/2012 2.85 4415.00 4407.90 14.98
3/9/2012 2.86 4415.00 4408.00 14.97
3/9/2012 2.86 4415.00 4408.00 14.95
3/10/2012 2.86 4415.10 4408.00 14.94
3/10/2012 2.86 4415.10 4408.00 14.92
3/11/2012 2.86 4415.10 4408.00 14.90
3/12/2012 2.86 4415.10 4408.00 14.89
3/12/2012 2.87 4415.10 4408.00 14.87
3/13/2012 2.87 4415.10 4408.00 14.86
3/13/2012 2.87 4415.20 4408.10 14.84
3/14/2012 2.87 4415.20 4408.10 14.83
3/14/2012 2.87 4415.20 4408.10 14.81
3/15/2012 2.87 4415.20 4408.10 14.79
3/15/2012 2.87 4415.20 4408.10 14.78
3/16/2012 2.88 4415.20 4408.10 14.76
3/17/2012 2.88 4415.30 4408.10 14.75
3/17/2012 2.88 4415.30 4408.10 14.73
3/18/2012 2.88 4415.30 4408.10 14.71
3/18/2012 2.88 4415.30 4408.20 14.70
3/19/2012 2.88 4415.30 4408.20 14.68
3/19/2012 2.89 4415.30 4408.20 14.67
3/20/2012 2.89 4415.30 4408.20 14.65
3/20/2012 2.89 4415.40 4408.20 14.64
38 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
3/21/2012 2.89 4415.40 4408.20 14.62
3/22/2012 2.89 4415.40 4408.20 14.60
3/22/2012 2.89 4415.40 4408.20 14.59
3/23/2012 2.89 4415.40 4408.30 14.57
3/23/2012 2.90 4415.40 4408.30 14.56
3/24/2012 2.90 4415.50 4408.30 14.54
3/24/2012 2.90 4415.50 4408.30 14.52
3/25/2012 2.90 4415.50 4408.30 14.51
3/25/2012 2.90 4415.50 4408.30 14.49
3/26/2012 2.90 4415.50 4408.30 14.48
3/27/2012 2.91 4415.50 4408.30 14.46
3/27/2012 2.91 4415.60 4408.30 14.45
3/28/2012 2.91 4415.60 4408.40 14.43
3/28/2012 2.91 4415.60 4408.40 14.41
3/29/2012 2.91 4415.60 4408.40 14.40
3/29/2012 2.91 4415.60 4408.40 14.38
3/30/2012 2.91 4415.60 4408.40 14.37
3/30/2012 2.92 4415.70 4408.40 14.35
3/31/2012 2.92 4415.70 4408.40 14.33
4/1/2012 2.92 4415.70 4408.40 14.32
4/1/2012 2.92 4415.70 4408.40 14.30
4/2/2012 2.92 4415.70 4408.50 14.29
4/2/2012 2.92 4415.70 4408.50 14.28
4/3/2012 2.92 4415.70 4408.50 14.26
4/3/2012 2.93 4415.80 4408.50 14.25
4/4/2012 2.93 4415.80 4408.50 14.23
4/4/2012 2.93 4415.80 4408.50 14.22
4/5/2012 2.93 4415.80 4408.50 14.21
4/6/2012 2.93 4415.80 4408.50 14.19
4/6/2012 2.93 4415.80 4408.60 14.18
4/7/2012 2.94 4415.80 4408.60 14.16
4/7/2012 2.94 4415.90 4408.60 14.15
4/8/2012 2.94 4415.90 4408.60 14.14
4/8/2012 2.94 4415.90 4408.60 14.12
4/9/2012 2.94 4415.90 4408.60 14.11
4/9/2012 2.94 4415.90 4408.60 14.09
4/10/2012 2.94 4415.90 4408.60 14.08
4/11/2012 2.95 4415.90 4408.60 14.07
4/11/2012 2.95 4415.90 4408.70 14.05
4/12/2012 2.95 4416.00 4408.70 14.04
4/12/2012 2.95 4416.00 4408.70 14.02
4/13/2012 2.95 4416.00 4408.70 14.01
4/13/2012 2.95 4416.00 4408.70 14.00
4/14/2012 2.96 4416.00 4408.70 13.98
4/14/2012 2.96 4416.00 4408.70 13.97
4/15/2012 2.96 4416.00 4408.70 13.95
4/16/2012 2.96 4416.10 4408.80 13.94
4/16/2012 2.96 4416.10 4408.80 13.93
4/17/2012 2.96 4416.10 4408.80 13.91
4/17/2012 2.96 4416.10 4408.80 13.90
39 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
4/18/2012 2.97 4416.10 4408.80 13.88
4/18/2012 2.97 4416.10 4408.80 13.87
4/19/2012 2.97 4416.10 4408.80 13.86
4/19/2012 2.97 4416.20 4408.80 13.84
4/20/2012 2.97 4416.20 4408.80 13.83
4/21/2012 2.97 4416.20 4408.90 13.81
4/21/2012 2.98 4416.20 4408.90 13.80
4/22/2012 2.98 4416.20 4408.90 13.79
4/22/2012 2.98 4416.20 4408.90 13.77
4/23/2012 2.98 4416.20 4408.90 13.76
4/23/2012 2.98 4416.30 4408.90 13.74
4/24/2012 2.98 4416.30 4408.90 13.73
4/24/2012 2.98 4416.30 4408.90 13.72
4/25/2012 2.99 4416.30 4408.90 13.70
4/26/2012 2.99 4416.30 4409.00 13.69
4/26/2012 2.99 4416.30 4409.00 13.67
4/27/2012 2.99 4416.30 4409.00 13.66
4/27/2012 2.99 4416.40 4409.00 13.65
4/28/2012 2.99 4416.40 4409.00 13.63
4/28/2012 2.99 4416.40 4409.00 13.62
4/29/2012 3.00 4416.40 4409.00 13.60
4/29/2012 3.00 4416.40 4409.00 13.59
4/30/2012 3.00 4416.40 4409.10 13.58
5/1/2012 3.00 4416.40 4409.10 13.56
5/1/2012 3.00 4416.50 4409.10 13.55
5/2/2012 3.00 4416.50 4409.10 13.53
5/2/2012 3.01 4416.50 4409.10 13.52
5/3/2012 3.01 4416.50 4409.10 13.51
5/3/2012 3.01 4416.50 4409.10 13.49
5/4/2012 3.01 4416.50 4409.10 13.48
5/4/2012 3.01 4416.50 4409.10 13.47
5/5/2012 3.01 4416.50 4409.20 13.45
5/6/2012 3.01 4416.60 4409.20 13.44
5/6/2012 3.02 4416.60 4409.20 13.43
5/7/2012 3.02 4416.60 4409.20 13.41
5/7/2012 3.02 4416.60 4409.20 13.40
5/8/2012 3.02 4416.60 4409.20 13.39
5/8/2012 3.02 4416.60 4409.20 13.37
5/9/2012 3.02 4416.60 4409.20 13.36
5/9/2012 3.03 4416.70 4409.20 13.35
5/10/2012 3.03 4416.70 4409.30 13.33
5/11/2012 3.03 4416.70 4409.30 13.32
5/11/2012 3.03 4416.70 4409.30 13.31
5/12/2012 3.03 4416.70 4409.30 13.29
5/12/2012 3.03 4416.70 4409.30 13.28
5/13/2012 3.03 4416.70 4409.30 13.27
5/13/2012 3.04 4416.70 4409.30 13.25
5/14/2012 3.04 4416.80 4409.30 13.24
5/14/2012 3.04 4416.80 4409.40 13.23
5/15/2012 3.04 4416.80 4409.40 13.21
40 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
5/16/2012 3.04 4416.80 4409.40 13.20
5/16/2012 3.04 4416.80 4409.40 13.19
5/17/2012 3.04 4416.80 4409.40 13.17
5/17/2012 3.05 4416.80 4409.40 13.16
5/18/2012 3.05 4416.90 4409.40 13.15
5/18/2012 3.05 4416.90 4409.40 13.13
5/19/2012 3.05 4416.90 4409.40 13.12
5/19/2012 3.05 4416.90 4409.50 13.11
5/20/2012 3.05 4416.90 4409.50 13.09
5/21/2012 3.06 4416.90 4409.50 13.08
5/21/2012 3.06 4416.90 4409.50 13.07
5/22/2012 3.06 4416.90 4409.50 13.05
5/22/2012 3.06 4417.00 4409.50 13.04
5/23/2012 3.06 4417.00 4409.50 13.03
5/23/2012 3.06 4417.00 4409.50 13.01
5/24/2012 3.06 4417.00 4409.60 13.00
5/24/2012 3.07 4417.00 4409.60 12.99
5/25/2012 3.07 4417.00 4409.60 12.97
5/26/2012 3.07 4417.00 4409.60 12.96
5/26/2012 3.07 4417.10 4409.60 12.95
5/27/2012 3.07 4417.10 4409.60 12.93
5/27/2012 3.07 4417.10 4409.60 12.92
5/28/2012 3.08 4417.10 4409.60 12.91
5/28/2012 3.08 4417.10 4409.60 12.89
5/29/2012 3.08 4417.10 4409.70 12.88
5/29/2012 3.08 4417.10 4409.70 12.87
5/30/2012 3.08 4417.10 4409.70 12.85
5/31/2012 3.08 4417.20 4409.70 12.84
5/31/2012 3.08 4417.20 4409.70 12.83
6/1/2012 3.09 4417.20 4409.70 12.81
6/1/2012 3.09 4417.20 4409.70 12.80
6/2/2012 3.09 4417.20 4409.70 12.79
6/2/2012 3.09 4417.20 4409.70 12.78
6/3/2012 3.09 4417.20 4409.80 12.77
6/3/2012 3.09 4417.20 4409.80 12.76
6/4/2012 3.10 4417.30 4409.80 12.74
6/5/2012 3.10 4417.30 4409.80 12.73
6/5/2012 3.10 4417.30 4409.80 12.72
6/6/2012 3.10 4417.30 4409.80 12.71
6/6/2012 3.10 4417.30 4409.80 12.70
6/7/2012 3.10 4417.30 4409.80 12.69
6/7/2012 3.10 4417.30 4409.90 12.68
6/8/2012 3.11 4417.30 4409.90 12.66
6/8/2012 3.11 4417.30 4409.90 12.65
6/9/2012 3.11 4417.40 4409.90 12.64
6/10/2012 3.11 4417.40 4409.90 12.63
6/10/2012 3.11 4417.40 4409.90 12.62
6/11/2012 3.11 4417.40 4409.90 12.61
6/11/2012 3.11 4417.40 4409.90 12.60
6/12/2012 3.12 4417.40 4409.90 12.59
41 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
6/12/2012 3.12 4417.40 4410.00 12.57
6/13/2012 3.12 4417.40 4410.00 12.56
6/13/2012 3.12 4417.40 4410.00 12.55
6/14/2012 3.12 4417.50 4410.00 12.54
6/15/2012 3.12 4417.50 4410.00 12.53
6/15/2012 3.13 4417.50 4410.00 12.52
6/16/2012 3.13 4417.50 4410.00 12.51
6/16/2012 3.13 4417.50 4410.00 12.49
6/17/2012 3.13 4417.50 4410.00 12.48
6/17/2012 3.13 4417.50 4410.10 12.47
6/18/2012 3.13 4417.50 4410.10 12.46
6/18/2012 3.13 4417.60 4410.10 12.45
6/19/2012 3.14 4417.60 4410.10 12.44
6/20/2012 3.14 4417.60 4410.10 12.43
6/20/2012 3.14 4417.60 4410.10 12.42
6/21/2012 3.14 4417.60 4410.10 12.40
6/21/2012 3.14 4417.60 4410.10 12.39
6/22/2012 3.14 4417.60 4410.10 12.38
6/22/2012 3.15 4417.60 4410.10 12.37
6/23/2012 3.15 4417.60 4410.20 12.36
6/23/2012 3.15 4417.70 4410.20 12.35
6/24/2012 3.15 4417.70 4410.20 12.34
6/25/2012 3.15 4417.70 4410.20 12.33
6/25/2012 3.15 4417.70 4410.20 12.31
6/26/2012 3.15 4417.70 4410.20 12.30
6/26/2012 3.16 4417.70 4410.20 12.29
6/27/2012 3.16 4417.70 4410.20 12.28
6/27/2012 3.16 4417.70 4410.20 12.27
6/28/2012 3.16 4417.70 4410.20 12.26
6/28/2012 3.16 4417.80 4410.30 12.25
6/29/2012 3.16 4417.80 4410.30 12.24
6/30/2012 3.17 4417.80 4410.30 12.22
6/30/2012 3.17 4417.80 4410.30 12.21
7/1/2012 3.17 4417.80 4410.30 12.20
7/1/2012 3.17 4417.80 4410.30 12.19
7/2/2012 3.17 4417.80 4410.30 12.19
7/2/2012 3.17 4417.80 4410.30 12.18
7/3/2012 3.17 4417.80 4410.30 12.17
7/3/2012 3.18 4417.80 4410.30 12.17
7/4/2012 3.18 4417.80 4410.40 12.16
7/5/2012 3.18 4417.90 4410.40 12.15
7/5/2012 3.18 4417.90 4410.40 12.14
7/6/2012 3.18 4417.90 4410.40 12.14
7/6/2012 3.18 4417.90 4410.40 12.13
7/7/2012 3.18 4417.90 4410.40 12.12
7/7/2012 3.19 4417.90 4410.40 12.11
7/8/2012 3.19 4417.90 4410.40 12.11
7/8/2012 3.19 4417.90 4410.40 12.10
7/9/2012 3.19 4417.90 4410.50 12.09
7/10/2012 3.19 4417.90 4410.50 12.09
42 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
7/10/2012 3.19 4417.90 4410.50 12.08
7/11/2012 3.20 4417.90 4410.50 12.07
7/11/2012 3.20 4417.90 4410.50 12.06
7/12/2012 3.20 4417.90 4410.50 12.06
7/12/2012 3.20 4418.00 4410.50 12.05
7/13/2012 3.20 4418.00 4410.50 12.04
7/13/2012 3.20 4418.00 4410.50 12.04
7/14/2012 3.20 4418.00 4410.50 12.03
7/15/2012 3.21 4418.00 4410.60 12.02
7/15/2012 3.21 4418.00 4410.60 12.01
7/16/2012 3.21 4418.00 4410.60 12.01
7/16/2012 3.21 4418.00 4410.60 12.00
7/17/2012 3.21 4418.00 4410.60 11.99
7/17/2012 3.21 4418.00 4410.60 11.98
7/18/2012 3.22 4418.00 4410.60 11.98
7/18/2012 3.22 4418.00 4410.60 11.97
7/19/2012 3.22 4418.00 4410.60 11.96
7/20/2012 3.22 4418.00 4410.60 11.96
7/20/2012 3.22 4418.10 4410.70 11.95
7/21/2012 3.22 4418.10 4410.70 11.94
7/21/2012 3.22 4418.10 4410.70 11.93
7/22/2012 3.23 4418.10 4410.70 11.93
7/22/2012 3.23 4418.10 4410.70 11.92
7/23/2012 3.23 4418.10 4410.70 11.91
7/23/2012 3.23 4418.10 4410.70 11.91
7/24/2012 3.23 4418.10 4410.70 11.90
7/25/2012 3.23 4418.10 4410.70 11.89
7/25/2012 3.24 4418.10 4410.70 11.88
7/26/2012 3.24 4418.10 4410.80 11.88
7/26/2012 3.24 4418.10 4410.80 11.87
7/27/2012 3.24 4418.10 4410.80 11.86
7/27/2012 3.24 4418.10 4410.80 11.86
7/28/2012 3.24 4418.20 4410.80 11.85
7/28/2012 3.24 4418.20 4410.80 11.84
7/29/2012 3.25 4418.20 4410.80 11.83
7/30/2012 3.25 4418.20 4410.80 11.83
7/30/2012 3.25 4418.20 4410.80 11.82
7/31/2012 3.25 4418.20 4410.80 11.81
7/31/2012 3.25 4418.20 4410.90 11.80
8/1/2012 3.25 4418.20 4410.90 11.80
8/1/2012 3.25 4418.20 4410.90 11.79
8/2/2012 3.26 4418.20 4410.90 11.78
8/2/2012 3.26 4418.20 4410.90 11.78
8/3/2012 3.26 4418.20 4410.90 11.77
8/4/2012 3.26 4418.20 4410.90 11.76
8/4/2012 3.26 4418.20 4410.90 11.75
8/5/2012 3.26 4418.30 4410.90 11.75
8/5/2012 3.27 4418.30 4410.90 11.74
8/6/2012 3.27 4418.30 4411.00 11.73
8/6/2012 3.27 4418.30 4411.00 11.73
43 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
8/7/2012 3.27 4418.30 4411.00 11.72
8/7/2012 3.27 4418.30 4411.00 11.71
8/8/2012 3.27 4418.30 4411.00 11.71
8/9/2012 3.27 4418.30 4411.00 11.70
8/9/2012 3.28 4418.30 4411.00 11.69
8/10/2012 3.28 4418.30 4411.00 11.68
8/10/2012 3.28 4418.30 4411.00 11.68
8/11/2012 3.28 4418.30 4411.10 11.67
8/11/2012 3.28 4418.30 4411.10 11.66
8/12/2012 3.28 4418.30 4411.10 11.66
8/12/2012 3.29 4418.40 4411.10 11.65
8/13/2012 3.29 4418.40 4411.10 11.64
8/14/2012 3.29 4418.40 4411.10 11.63
8/14/2012 3.29 4418.40 4411.10 11.63
8/15/2012 3.29 4418.40 4411.10 11.62
8/15/2012 3.29 4418.40 4411.10 11.61
8/16/2012 3.29 4418.40 4411.10 11.61
8/16/2012 3.30 4418.40 4411.20 11.60
8/17/2012 3.30 4418.40 4411.20 11.59
8/17/2012 3.30 4418.40 4411.20 11.58
8/18/2012 3.30 4418.40 4411.20 11.58
8/19/2012 3.30 4418.40 4411.20 11.57
8/19/2012 3.30 4418.40 4411.20 11.56
8/20/2012 3.31 4418.40 4411.20 11.56
8/20/2012 3.31 4418.50 4411.20 11.55
8/21/2012 3.31 4418.50 4411.20 11.54
8/21/2012 3.31 4418.50 4411.20 11.54
8/22/2012 3.31 4418.50 4411.30 11.53
8/22/2012 3.31 4418.50 4411.30 11.52
8/23/2012 3.31 4418.50 4411.30 11.51
8/24/2012 3.32 4418.50 4411.30 11.51
8/24/2012 3.32 4418.50 4411.30 11.50
8/25/2012 3.32 4418.50 4411.30 11.49
8/25/2012 3.32 4418.50 4411.30 11.49
8/26/2012 3.32 4418.50 4411.30 11.48
8/26/2012 3.32 4418.50 4411.30 11.47
8/27/2012 3.32 4418.50 4411.30 11.46
8/27/2012 3.33 4418.50 4411.40 11.46
8/28/2012 3.33 4418.50 4411.40 11.45
8/29/2012 3.33 4418.60 4411.40 11.44
8/29/2012 3.33 4418.60 4411.40 11.44
8/30/2012 3.33 4418.60 4411.40 11.43
8/30/2012 3.33 4418.60 4411.40 11.42
8/31/2012 3.34 4418.60 4411.40 11.42
8/31/2012 3.34 4418.60 4411.40 11.41
9/1/2012 3.34 4418.60 4411.40 11.40
9/1/2012 3.34 4418.60 4411.40 11.39
9/2/2012 3.34 4418.60 4411.50 11.39
9/3/2012 3.34 4418.60 4411.50 11.38
9/3/2012 3.34 4418.60 4411.50 11.37
44 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
9/4/2012 3.35 4418.60 4411.50 11.37
9/4/2012 3.35 4418.60 4411.50 11.36
9/5/2012 3.35 4418.60 4411.50 11.35
9/5/2012 3.35 4418.70 4411.50 11.34
9/6/2012 3.35 4418.70 4411.50 11.34
9/6/2012 3.35 4418.70 4411.50 11.33
9/7/2012 3.36 4418.70 4411.60 11.32
9/8/2012 3.36 4418.70 4411.60 11.31
9/8/2012 3.36 4418.70 4411.60 11.31
9/9/2012 3.36 4418.70 4411.60 11.30
9/9/2012 3.36 4418.70 4411.60 11.29
9/10/2012 3.36 4418.70 4411.60 11.29
9/10/2012 3.36 4418.70 4411.60 11.28
9/11/2012 3.37 4418.70 4411.60 11.27
9/11/2012 3.37 4418.70 4411.60 11.26
9/12/2012 3.37 4418.70 4411.60 11.26
9/13/2012 3.37 4418.80 4411.70 11.25
9/13/2012 3.37 4418.80 4411.70 11.24
9/14/2012 3.37 4418.80 4411.70 11.24
9/14/2012 3.38 4418.80 4411.70 11.23
9/15/2012 3.38 4418.80 4411.70 11.22
9/15/2012 3.38 4418.80 4411.70 11.21
9/16/2012 3.38 4418.80 4411.70 11.21
9/16/2012 3.38 4418.80 4411.70 11.20
9/17/2012 3.38 4418.80 4411.70 11.19
9/18/2012 3.38 4418.80 4411.70 11.19
9/18/2012 3.39 4418.80 4411.80 11.18
9/19/2012 3.39 4418.80 4411.80 11.17
9/19/2012 3.39 4418.80 4411.80 11.16
9/20/2012 3.39 4418.80 4411.80 11.16
9/20/2012 3.39 4418.90 4411.80 11.15
9/21/2012 3.39 4418.90 4411.80 11.14
9/21/2012 3.39 4418.90 4411.80 11.14
9/22/2012 3.40 4418.90 4411.80 11.13
9/23/2012 3.40 4418.90 4411.80 11.12
9/23/2012 3.40 4418.90 4411.80 11.11
9/24/2012 3.40 4418.90 4411.90 11.11
9/24/2012 3.40 4418.90 4411.90 11.10
9/25/2012 3.40 4418.90 4411.90 11.09
9/25/2012 3.41 4418.90 4411.90 11.09
9/26/2012 3.41 4418.90 4411.90 11.08
9/26/2012 3.41 4418.90 4411.90 11.07
9/27/2012 3.41 4418.90 4411.90 11.06
9/28/2012 3.41 4418.90 4411.90 11.06
9/28/2012 3.41 4418.90 4411.90 11.05
9/29/2012 3.41 4419.00 4411.90 11.04
9/29/2012 3.42 4419.00 4412.00 11.04
9/30/2012 3.42 4419.00 4412.00 11.03
9/30/2012 3.42 4419.00 4412.00 11.02
10/1/2012 3.42 4419.00 4412.00 11.02
45 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
10/1/2012 3.42 4419.00 4412.00 11.01
10/2/2012 3.42 4419.00 4412.00 11.00
10/3/2012 3.43 4419.00 4412.00 10.99
10/3/2012 3.43 4419.00 4412.00 10.98
10/4/2012 3.43 4419.00 4412.00 10.97
10/4/2012 3.43 4419.00 4412.00 10.96
10/5/2012 3.43 4419.00 4412.10 10.95
10/5/2012 3.43 4419.10 4412.10 10.94
10/6/2012 3.43 4419.10 4412.10 10.93
10/6/2012 3.44 4419.10 4412.10 10.93
10/7/2012 3.44 4419.10 4412.10 10.92
10/8/2012 3.44 4419.10 4412.10 10.91
10/8/2012 3.44 4419.10 4412.10 10.90
10/9/2012 3.44 4419.10 4412.10 10.89
10/9/2012 3.44 4419.10 4412.10 10.88
10/10/2012 3.44 4419.10 4412.20 10.87
10/10/2012 3.45 4419.10 4412.20 10.86
10/11/2012 3.45 4419.10 4412.20 10.85
10/11/2012 3.45 4419.20 4412.20 10.85
10/12/2012 3.45 4419.20 4412.20 10.84
10/13/2012 3.45 4419.20 4412.20 10.83
10/13/2012 3.45 4419.20 4412.20 10.82
10/14/2012 3.46 4419.20 4412.20 10.81
10/14/2012 3.46 4419.20 4412.20 10.80
10/15/2012 3.46 4419.20 4412.20 10.79
10/15/2012 3.46 4419.20 4412.30 10.78
10/16/2012 3.46 4419.20 4412.30 10.77
10/16/2012 3.46 4419.20 4412.30 10.77
10/17/2012 3.46 4419.20 4412.30 10.76
10/18/2012 3.47 4419.30 4412.30 10.75
10/18/2012 3.47 4419.30 4412.30 10.74
10/19/2012 3.47 4419.30 4412.30 10.73
10/19/2012 3.47 4419.30 4412.30 10.72
10/20/2012 3.47 4419.30 4412.30 10.71
10/20/2012 3.47 4419.30 4412.30 10.70
10/21/2012 3.48 4419.30 4412.40 10.69
10/21/2012 3.48 4419.30 4412.40 10.69
10/22/2012 3.48 4419.30 4412.40 10.68
10/23/2012 3.48 4419.30 4412.40 10.67
10/23/2012 3.48 4419.30 4412.40 10.66
10/24/2012 3.48 4419.40 4412.40 10.65
10/24/2012 3.48 4419.40 4412.40 10.64
10/25/2012 3.49 4419.40 4412.40 10.63
10/25/2012 3.49 4419.40 4412.40 10.62
10/26/2012 3.49 4419.40 4412.40 10.61
10/26/2012 3.49 4419.40 4412.50 10.61
10/27/2012 3.49 4419.40 4412.50 10.60
10/28/2012 3.49 4419.40 4412.50 10.59
10/28/2012 3.50 4419.40 4412.50 10.58
10/29/2012 3.50 4419.40 4412.50 10.57
46 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
10/29/2012 3.50 4419.40 4412.50 10.56
10/30/2012 3.50 4419.40 4412.50 10.55
10/30/2012 3.50 4419.50 4412.50 10.54
10/31/2012 3.50 4419.50 4412.50 10.53
10/31/2012 3.50 4419.50 4412.50 10.53
11/1/2012 3.51 4419.50 4412.60 10.52
11/2/2012 3.51 4419.50 4412.60 10.51
11/2/2012 3.51 4419.50 4412.60 10.49
11/3/2012 3.51 4419.50 4412.60 10.48
11/3/2012 3.51 4419.50 4412.60 10.47
11/4/2012 3.51 4419.50 4412.60 10.46
11/4/2012 3.51 4419.60 4412.60 10.45
11/5/2012 3.52 4419.60 4412.60 10.44
11/5/2012 3.52 4419.60 4412.60 10.43
11/6/2012 3.52 4419.60 4412.70 10.41
11/7/2012 3.52 4419.60 4412.70 10.40
11/7/2012 3.52 4419.60 4412.70 10.39
11/8/2012 3.52 4419.60 4412.70 10.38
11/8/2012 3.53 4419.60 4412.70 10.37
11/9/2012 3.53 4419.60 4412.70 10.36
11/9/2012 3.53 4419.70 4412.70 10.35
11/10/2012 3.53 4419.70 4412.70 10.34
11/10/2012 3.53 4419.70 4412.70 10.32
11/11/2012 3.53 4419.70 4412.70 10.31
11/12/2012 3.53 4419.70 4412.80 10.30
11/12/2012 3.54 4419.70 4412.80 10.29
11/13/2012 3.54 4419.70 4412.80 10.28
11/13/2012 3.54 4419.70 4412.80 10.27
11/14/2012 3.54 4419.70 4412.80 10.26
11/14/2012 3.54 4419.80 4412.80 10.25
11/15/2012 3.54 4419.80 4412.80 10.23
11/15/2012 3.55 4419.80 4412.80 10.22
11/16/2012 3.55 4419.80 4412.80 10.21
11/17/2012 3.55 4419.80 4412.80 10.20
11/17/2012 3.55 4419.80 4412.90 10.19
11/18/2012 3.55 4419.80 4412.90 10.18
11/18/2012 3.55 4419.80 4412.90 10.17
11/19/2012 3.55 4419.80 4412.90 10.16
11/19/2012 3.56 4419.90 4412.90 10.14
11/20/2012 3.56 4419.90 4412.90 10.13
11/20/2012 3.56 4419.90 4412.90 10.12
11/21/2012 3.56 4419.90 4412.90 10.11
11/22/2012 3.56 4419.90 4412.90 10.10
11/22/2012 3.56 4419.90 4412.90 10.09
11/23/2012 3.57 4419.90 4413.00 10.08
11/23/2012 3.57 4419.90 4413.00 10.07
11/24/2012 3.57 4419.90 4413.00 10.05
11/24/2012 3.57 4420.00 4413.00 10.04
11/25/2012 3.57 4420.00 4413.00 10.03
11/25/2012 3.57 4420.00 4413.00 10.02
47 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
11/26/2012 3.57 4420.00 4413.00 10.01
11/27/2012 3.58 4420.00 4413.00 10.00
11/27/2012 3.58 4420.00 4413.00 9.99
11/28/2012 3.58 4420.00 4413.00 9.98
11/28/2012 3.58 4420.00 4413.10 9.97
11/29/2012 3.58 4420.00 4413.10 9.96
11/30/2012 3.58 4420.10 4413.10 9.94
11/30/2012 3.59 4420.10 4413.10 9.93
12/1/2012 3.59 4420.10 4413.10 9.92
12/2/2012 3.59 4420.10 4413.10 9.90
12/2/2012 3.59 4420.10 4413.10 9.89
12/3/2012 3.59 4420.10 4413.10 9.88
12/3/2012 3.59 4420.10 4413.20 9.87
12/4/2012 3.60 4420.10 4413.20 9.85
12/4/2012 3.60 4420.20 4413.20 9.84
12/5/2012 3.60 4420.20 4413.20 9.83
12/5/2012 3.60 4420.20 4413.20 9.82
12/6/2012 3.60 4420.20 4413.20 9.80
12/7/2012 3.60 4420.20 4413.20 9.79
12/7/2012 3.60 4420.20 4413.20 9.78
12/8/2012 3.61 4420.20 4413.20 9.77
12/8/2012 3.61 4420.20 4413.20 9.75
12/9/2012 3.61 4420.30 4413.30 9.74
12/9/2012 3.61 4420.30 4413.30 9.73
12/10/2012 3.61 4420.30 4413.30 9.72
12/10/2012 3.61 4420.30 4413.30 9.70
12/11/2012 3.62 4420.30 4413.30 9.69
12/12/2012 3.62 4420.30 4413.30 9.68
12/12/2012 3.62 4420.30 4413.30 9.67
12/13/2012 3.62 4420.30 4413.30 9.66
12/13/2012 3.62 4420.40 4413.30 9.64
12/14/2012 3.62 4420.40 4413.30 9.63
12/14/2012 3.62 4420.40 4413.40 9.62
12/15/2012 3.63 4420.40 4413.40 9.61
12/15/2012 3.63 4420.40 4413.40 9.59
12/16/2012 3.63 4420.40 4413.40 9.58
12/17/2012 3.63 4420.40 4413.40 9.57
12/17/2012 3.63 4420.40 4413.40 9.56
12/18/2012 3.63 4420.50 4413.40 9.54
12/18/2012 3.64 4420.50 4413.40 9.53
12/19/2012 3.64 4420.50 4413.40 9.52
12/19/2012 3.64 4420.50 4413.40 9.51
12/20/2012 3.64 4420.50 4413.50 9.49
12/20/2012 3.64 4420.50 4413.50 9.48
12/21/2012 3.64 4420.50 4413.50 9.47
12/22/2012 3.64 4420.50 4413.50 9.46
12/22/2012 3.65 4420.60 4413.50 9.44
12/23/2012 3.65 4420.60 4413.50 9.43
12/23/2012 3.65 4420.60 4413.50 9.42
12/24/2012 3.65 4420.60 4413.50 9.41
48 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
12/24/2012 3.65 4420.60 4413.50 9.39
12/25/2012 3.65 4420.60 4413.50 9.38
12/25/2012 3.65 4420.60 4413.60 9.37
12/26/2012 3.66 4420.60 4413.60 9.36
12/27/2012 3.66 4420.70 4413.60 9.35
12/27/2012 3.66 4420.70 4413.60 9.33
12/28/2012 3.66 4420.70 4413.60 9.32
12/28/2012 3.66 4420.70 4413.60 9.31
12/29/2012 3.66 4420.70 4413.60 9.30
12/29/2012 3.67 4420.70 4413.60 9.28
12/30/2012 3.67 4420.70 4413.60 9.27
12/30/2012 3.67 4420.70 4413.60 9.26
12/31/2012 3.67 4420.80 4413.70 9.25
1/1/2013 3.67 4420.80 4413.70 9.23
1/1/2013 3.67 4420.80 4413.70 9.22
1/2/2013 3.67 4420.80 4413.70 9.21
1/2/2013 3.68 4420.80 4413.70 9.19
1/3/2013 3.68 4420.80 4413.70 9.18
1/3/2013 3.68 4420.80 4413.70 9.17
1/4/2013 3.68 4420.80 4413.70 9.15
1/4/2013 3.68 4420.90 4413.70 9.14
1/5/2013 3.68 4420.90 4413.80 9.13
1/6/2013 3.69 4420.90 4413.80 9.11
1/6/2013 3.69 4420.90 4413.80 9.10
1/7/2013 3.69 4420.90 4413.80 9.09
1/7/2013 3.69 4420.90 4413.80 9.07
1/8/2013 3.69 4420.90 4413.80 9.06
1/8/2013 3.69 4421.00 4413.80 9.05
1/9/2013 3.69 4421.00 4413.80 9.03
1/9/2013 3.70 4421.00 4413.80 9.02
1/10/2013 3.70 4421.00 4413.80 9.00
1/11/2013 3.70 4421.00 4413.90 8.99
1/11/2013 3.70 4421.00 4413.90 8.98
1/12/2013 3.70 4421.00 4413.90 8.96
1/12/2013 3.70 4421.00 4413.90 8.95
1/13/2013 3.71 4421.10 4413.90 8.94
1/13/2013 3.71 4421.10 4413.90 8.92
1/14/2013 3.71 4421.10 4413.90 8.91
1/14/2013 3.71 4421.10 4413.90 8.90
1/15/2013 3.71 4421.10 4413.90 8.88
1/16/2013 3.71 4421.10 4413.90 8.87
1/16/2013 3.71 4421.10 4414.00 8.86
1/17/2013 3.72 4421.20 4414.00 8.84
1/17/2013 3.72 4421.20 4414.00 8.83
1/18/2013 3.72 4421.20 4414.00 8.82
1/18/2013 3.72 4421.20 4414.00 8.80
1/19/2013 3.72 4421.20 4414.00 8.79
1/19/2013 3.72 4421.20 4414.00 8.78
1/20/2013 3.72 4421.20 4414.00 8.76
1/21/2013 3.73 4421.30 4414.00 8.75
49 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
1/21/2013 3.73 4421.30 4414.00 8.74
1/22/2013 3.73 4421.30 4414.10 8.72
1/22/2013 3.73 4421.30 4414.10 8.71
1/23/2013 3.73 4421.30 4414.10 8.70
1/23/2013 3.73 4421.30 4414.10 8.68
1/24/2013 3.74 4421.30 4414.10 8.67
1/24/2013 3.74 4421.30 4414.10 8.66
1/25/2013 3.74 4421.40 4414.10 8.64
1/26/2013 3.74 4421.40 4414.10 8.63
1/26/2013 3.74 4421.40 4414.10 8.61
1/27/2013 3.74 4421.40 4414.10 8.60
1/27/2013 3.74 4421.40 4414.20 8.59
1/28/2013 3.75 4421.40 4414.20 8.57
1/28/2013 3.75 4421.40 4414.20 8.56
1/29/2013 3.75 4421.50 4414.20 8.55
1/29/2013 3.75 4421.50 4414.20 8.53
1/30/2013 3.75 4421.50 4414.20 8.52
1/31/2013 3.75 4421.50 4414.20 8.51
1/31/2013 3.76 4421.50 4414.20 8.49
2/1/2013 3.76 4421.50 4414.20 8.48
2/1/2013 3.76 4421.50 4414.30 8.47
2/2/2013 3.76 4421.50 4414.30 8.45
2/2/2013 3.76 4421.60 4414.30 8.44
2/3/2013 3.76 4421.60 4414.30 8.43
2/3/2013 3.76 4421.60 4414.30 8.41
2/4/2013 3.77 4421.60 4414.30 8.40
2/5/2013 3.77 4421.60 4414.30 8.38
2/5/2013 3.77 4421.60 4414.30 8.37
2/6/2013 3.77 4421.60 4414.30 8.36
2/6/2013 3.77 4421.70 4414.30 8.34
2/7/2013 3.77 4421.70 4414.40 8.33
2/7/2013 3.78 4421.70 4414.40 8.32
2/8/2013 3.78 4421.70 4414.40 8.30
2/8/2013 3.78 4421.70 4414.40 8.29
2/9/2013 3.78 4421.70 4414.40 8.28
2/10/2013 3.78 4421.70 4414.40 8.26
2/10/2013 3.78 4421.80 4414.40 8.25
2/11/2013 3.78 4421.80 4414.40 8.24
2/11/2013 3.79 4421.80 4414.40 8.22
2/12/2013 3.79 4421.80 4414.40 8.21
2/12/2013 3.79 4421.80 4414.50 8.19
2/13/2013 3.79 4421.80 4414.50 8.18
2/13/2013 3.79 4421.80 4414.50 8.17
2/14/2013 3.79 4421.80 4414.50 8.15
2/15/2013 3.79 4421.90 4414.50 8.14
2/15/2013 3.80 4421.90 4414.50 8.13
2/16/2013 3.80 4421.90 4414.50 8.11
2/16/2013 3.80 4421.90 4414.50 8.10
2/17/2013 3.80 4421.90 4414.50 8.09
2/17/2013 3.80 4421.90 4414.50 8.07
50 of 51
Table 1B Tailings and Pond Elevation for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of
750 tons/day
Date/Time
Year Fraction
[yr]
Tails Pool Elevation
South [ft]
Tails Elevation
South [ft] FreeBoard [ft]
2/18/2013 3.80 4421.90 4414.60 8.06
2/18/2013 3.81 4422.00 4414.60 8.04
2/19/2013 3.81 4422.00 4414.60 8.03
2/20/2013 3.81 4422.00 4414.60 8.02
2/20/2013 3.81 4422.00 4414.60 8.00
2/21/2013 3.81 4422.00 4414.60 7.99
2/21/2013 3.81 4422.00 4414.60 7.98
2/22/2013 3.81 4422.00 4414.60 7.96
2/22/2013 3.82 4422.10 4414.60 7.95
2/23/2013 3.82 4422.10 4414.60 7.94
2/23/2013 3.82 4422.10 4414.70 7.92
2/24/2013 3.82 4422.10 4414.70 7.91
2/25/2013 3.82 4422.10 4414.70 7.89
2/25/2013 3.82 4422.10 4414.70 7.88
2/26/2013 3.83 4422.10 4414.70 7.87
2/26/2013 3.83 4422.10 4414.70 7.85
2/27/2013 3.83 4422.20 4414.70 7.84
2/27/2013 3.83 4422.20 4414.70 7.83
2/28/2013 3.83 4422.20 4414.70 7.81
2/28/2013 3.83 4422.20 4414.70 7.80
3/1/2013 3.83 4422.20 4414.80 7.79
3/2/2013 3.84 4422.20 4414.80 7.77
3/2/2013 3.84 4422.20 4414.80 7.76
3/3/2013 3.84 4422.30 4414.80 7.74
3/3/2013 3.84 4422.30 4414.80 7.73
3/4/2013 3.84 4422.30 4414.80 7.72
3/4/2013 3.84 4422.30 4414.80 7.70
3/5/2013 3.84 4422.30 4414.80 7.69
3/5/2013 3.85 4422.30 4414.80 7.67
3/6/2013 3.85 4422.30 4414.90 7.66
3/7/2013 3.85 4422.40 4414.90 7.64
3/7/2013 3.85 4422.40 4414.90 7.63
3/8/2013 3.85 4422.40 4414.90 7.62
3/8/2013 3.85 4422.40 4414.90 7.60
3/9/2013 3.86 4422.40 4414.90 7.59
3/9/2013 3.86 4422.40 4414.90 7.57
3/10/2013 3.86 4422.40 4414.90 7.56
3/10/2013 3.86 4422.50 4414.90 7.55
3/11/2013 3.86 4422.50 4414.90 7.53
3/12/2013 3.86 4422.50 4415.00 7.52
3/12/2013 3.86 4422.50 4415.00 7.50
51 of 51
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
5/1/2009 3.80 82.31 0.00 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/2/2009 3.80 82.31 1.16 21.40 95.43 75.48
5/3/2009 3.80 82.31 1.89 21.40 95.43 75.48
5/4/2009 3.80 82.31 2.63 21.40 95.43 75.48
5/5/2009 3.80 82.31 3.36 21.40 95.43 75.48
5/6/2009 3.80 82.31 4.09 21.40 95.43 75.48
5/7/2009 3.80 82.31 4.81 21.40 95.43 75.48
5/8/2009 3.80 82.31 5.54 21.40 95.43 75.48
5/9/2009 3.80 82.31 6.26 21.40 95.43 75.48
5/10/2009 3.80 82.31 6.99 21.40 95.43 75.48
5/11/2009 3.80 82.31 7.45 21.40 95.43 75.48
5/12/2009 3.80 82.31 7.76 21.40 95.43 75.48
5/13/2009 3.80 82.31 8.06 21.40 95.43 75.48
5/14/2009 3.80 82.31 8.37 21.40 95.43 75.48
5/15/2009 3.80 82.31 8.67 21.40 95.43 75.48
5/16/2009 3.80 82.31 8.97 21.40 95.43 75.48
5/17/2009 3.80 82.31 9.28 21.40 95.43 75.48
5/18/2009 3.80 82.31 9.58 21.40 95.43 75.48
5/19/2009 3.80 82.31 9.88 21.40 95.43 75.48
5/20/2009 3.80 82.31 10.19 21.40 95.43 75.48
5/21/2009 3.80 82.31 10.49 21.40 95.43 75.48
5/22/2009 3.80 82.31 10.79 21.40 95.43 75.48
5/23/2009 3.80 82.31 11.10 21.40 95.43 75.48
5/24/2009 3.80 82.31 11.40 21.40 95.43 75.48
5/25/2009 3.80 82.31 11.70 21.40 95.43 75.48
5/26/2009 3.80 82.31 12.00 21.40 95.43 75.48
5/27/2009 3.80 82.31 12.30 21.40 95.43 75.48
5/28/2009 3.80 82.31 12.60 21.40 95.43 75.48
5/29/2009 3.80 82.31 12.90 21.40 95.43 75.48
5/30/2009 3.80 82.31 13.20 21.40 95.43 75.48
5/31/2009 3.80 82.31 13.50 21.40 95.43 75.48
6/1/2009 5.28 82.31 19.02 21.40 95.43 75.48
6/2/2009 5.28 82.31 19.43 21.40 95.43 75.48
6/3/2009 5.28 82.31 19.84 21.40 95.43 75.48
6/4/2009 5.28 82.31 20.25 21.40 95.43 75.48
6/5/2009 5.28 82.31 20.65 21.40 95.43 75.48
6/6/2009 5.28 82.31 21.06 21.40 95.43 75.48
6/7/2009 5.28 82.31 21.46 21.40 95.43 75.48
6/8/2009 5.28 82.31 21.87 21.40 95.43 75.48
6/9/2009 5.28 82.31 22.27 21.40 95.43 75.48
6/10/2009 5.28 82.31 22.68 21.40 95.43 75.48
6/11/2009 5.28 82.31 23.08 21.40 95.43 75.48
6/12/2009 5.28 82.31 23.48 21.40 95.43 75.48
6/13/2009 5.28 82.31 23.88 21.40 95.43 75.48
6/14/2009 5.28 82.31 24.29 21.40 95.43 75.48
6/15/2009 5.28 82.31 24.69 21.40 95.43 75.48
6/16/2009 5.28 82.31 25.09 21.40 95.43 75.48
1 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
6/17/2009 5.28 82.31 25.49 21.40 95.43 75.48
6/18/2009 5.28 82.31 25.89 21.40 95.43 75.48
6/19/2009 5.28 82.31 26.29 21.40 95.43 75.48
6/20/2009 5.28 82.31 26.68 21.40 95.43 75.48
6/21/2009 5.28 82.31 27.08 21.40 95.43 75.48
6/22/2009 5.28 82.31 27.43 21.40 95.43 75.48
6/23/2009 5.28 82.31 27.66 21.40 95.43 75.48
6/24/2009 5.28 82.31 27.89 21.40 95.43 75.48
6/25/2009 5.28 82.31 28.11 21.40 95.43 75.48
6/26/2009 5.28 82.31 28.34 21.40 95.43 75.48
6/27/2009 5.28 82.31 28.57 21.40 95.43 75.48
6/28/2009 5.28 82.31 28.79 21.40 95.43 75.48
6/29/2009 5.28 82.31 29.02 21.40 95.43 75.48
6/30/2009 5.28 82.31 29.24 21.40 95.43 75.48
7/1/2009 6.98 82.31 45.07 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/2/2009 6.98 82.31 45.18 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/3/2009 6.98 82.31 45.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/4/2009 6.98 82.31 45.40 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/5/2009 6.98 82.31 45.51 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/6/2009 6.98 82.31 45.62 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/7/2009 6.98 82.31 45.73 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/8/2009 6.98 82.31 45.84 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/9/2009 6.98 82.31 45.95 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/10/2009 6.98 82.31 46.05 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/11/2009 6.98 82.31 46.16 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/12/2009 6.98 82.31 46.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/13/2009 6.98 82.31 46.38 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/14/2009 6.98 82.31 46.49 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/15/2009 6.98 82.31 46.59 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/16/2009 6.98 82.31 46.70 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/17/2009 6.98 82.31 46.81 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/18/2009 6.98 82.31 46.92 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/19/2009 6.98 82.31 47.02 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/20/2009 6.98 82.31 47.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/21/2009 6.98 82.31 47.24 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/22/2009 6.98 82.31 47.35 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/23/2009 6.98 82.31 47.45 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/24/2009 6.98 82.31 47.56 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/25/2009 6.98 82.31 47.67 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/26/2009 6.98 82.31 47.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/27/2009 6.98 82.31 47.88 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/28/2009 6.98 82.31 47.99 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/29/2009 6.98 82.31 48.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/30/2009 6.98 82.31 48.20 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/31/2009 6.98 82.31 48.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/1/2009 23.68 82.31 59.58 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/2/2009 23.68 82.31 59.74 21.40 19.96 0.00
2 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
8/3/2009 23.68 82.31 59.89 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/4/2009 23.68 82.31 60.05 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/5/2009 23.68 82.31 60.20 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/6/2009 23.68 82.31 60.36 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/7/2009 23.68 82.31 60.51 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/8/2009 23.68 82.31 60.67 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/9/2009 23.68 82.31 60.82 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/10/2009 23.68 82.31 60.98 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/11/2009 23.68 82.31 61.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/12/2009 23.68 82.31 61.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/13/2009 23.68 82.31 61.44 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/14/2009 23.68 82.31 61.59 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/15/2009 23.68 82.31 61.75 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/16/2009 23.68 82.31 61.90 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/17/2009 23.68 82.31 62.05 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/18/2009 23.68 82.31 62.20 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/19/2009 23.68 82.31 62.36 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/20/2009 23.68 82.31 62.51 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/21/2009 23.68 82.31 62.66 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/22/2009 23.68 82.31 62.81 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/23/2009 23.68 82.31 62.96 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/24/2009 23.68 82.31 63.11 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/25/2009 23.68 82.31 63.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/26/2009 23.68 82.31 63.42 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/27/2009 23.68 82.31 63.57 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/28/2009 23.68 82.31 63.72 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/29/2009 23.68 82.31 63.87 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/30/2009 23.68 82.31 64.02 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/31/2009 23.68 82.31 64.17 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/1/2009 24.52 82.31 64.32 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/2/2009 24.52 82.31 64.47 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/3/2009 24.52 82.31 64.62 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/4/2009 24.52 82.31 64.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/5/2009 24.52 82.31 64.92 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/6/2009 24.52 82.31 65.07 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/7/2009 24.52 82.31 65.22 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/8/2009 24.52 82.31 65.37 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/9/2009 24.52 82.31 65.52 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/10/2009 24.52 82.31 65.67 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/11/2009 24.52 82.31 65.82 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/12/2009 24.52 82.31 65.97 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/13/2009 24.52 82.31 66.12 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/14/2009 24.52 82.31 66.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/15/2009 24.52 82.31 66.42 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/16/2009 24.52 82.31 66.56 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/17/2009 24.52 82.31 66.71 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/18/2009 24.52 82.31 66.86 21.40 19.96 0.00
3 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
9/19/2009 24.52 82.31 67.01 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/20/2009 24.52 82.31 67.16 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/21/2009 24.52 82.31 67.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/22/2009 24.52 82.31 67.45 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/23/2009 24.52 82.31 67.60 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/24/2009 24.52 82.31 67.74 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/25/2009 24.52 82.31 67.89 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/26/2009 24.52 82.31 68.04 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/27/2009 24.52 82.31 68.18 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/28/2009 24.52 82.31 68.33 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/29/2009 24.52 82.31 68.47 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/30/2009 24.52 82.31 68.62 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/1/2009 20.72 82.31 58.02 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/2/2009 20.72 82.31 58.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/3/2009 20.72 82.31 58.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/4/2009 20.72 82.31 58.40 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/5/2009 20.72 82.31 58.53 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/6/2009 20.72 82.31 58.66 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/7/2009 20.72 82.31 58.79 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/8/2009 20.72 82.31 58.91 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/9/2009 20.72 82.31 59.04 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/10/2009 20.72 82.31 59.17 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/11/2009 20.72 82.31 59.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/12/2009 20.72 82.31 59.42 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/13/2009 20.72 82.31 59.55 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/14/2009 20.72 82.31 59.67 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/15/2009 20.72 82.31 59.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/16/2009 20.72 82.31 59.92 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/17/2009 20.72 82.31 60.05 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/18/2009 20.72 82.31 60.17 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/19/2009 20.72 82.31 60.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/20/2009 20.72 82.31 60.43 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/21/2009 20.72 82.31 60.55 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/22/2009 20.72 82.31 60.68 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/23/2009 20.72 82.31 60.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/24/2009 20.72 82.31 60.92 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/25/2009 20.72 82.31 61.05 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/26/2009 20.72 82.31 61.17 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/27/2009 20.72 82.31 61.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/28/2009 20.72 82.31 61.42 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/29/2009 20.72 82.31 61.55 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/30/2009 20.72 82.31 61.67 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/31/2009 20.72 82.31 61.79 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/1/2009 12.90 82.31 42.81 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/2/2009 12.90 82.31 42.89 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/3/2009 12.90 82.31 42.98 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/4/2009 12.90 82.31 43.07 21.40 19.96 0.00
4 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
11/5/2009 12.90 82.31 43.16 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/6/2009 12.90 82.31 43.24 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/7/2009 12.90 82.31 43.33 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/8/2009 12.90 82.31 43.42 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/9/2009 12.90 82.31 43.50 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/10/2009 12.90 82.31 43.59 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/11/2009 12.90 82.31 43.68 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/12/2009 12.90 82.31 43.76 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/13/2009 12.90 82.31 43.85 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/14/2009 12.90 82.31 43.94 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/15/2009 12.90 82.31 44.02 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/16/2009 12.90 82.31 44.11 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/17/2009 12.90 82.31 44.19 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/18/2009 12.90 82.31 44.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/19/2009 12.90 82.31 44.37 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/20/2009 12.90 82.31 44.45 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/21/2009 12.90 82.31 44.54 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/22/2009 12.90 82.31 44.62 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/23/2009 12.90 82.31 44.71 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/24/2009 12.90 82.31 44.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/25/2009 12.90 82.31 44.88 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/26/2009 12.90 82.31 44.97 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/27/2009 12.90 82.31 45.05 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/28/2009 12.90 82.31 45.14 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/29/2009 12.90 82.31 45.22 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/30/2009 12.90 82.31 45.31 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/1/2009 7.82 82.31 29.99 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/2/2009 7.82 82.31 30.05 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/3/2009 7.82 82.31 30.11 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/4/2009 7.82 82.31 30.18 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/5/2009 7.82 82.31 30.24 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/6/2009 7.82 82.31 30.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/7/2009 7.82 82.31 30.36 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/8/2009 7.82 82.31 30.42 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/9/2009 7.82 82.31 30.48 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/10/2009 7.82 82.31 30.54 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/11/2009 7.82 82.31 30.60 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/12/2009 7.82 82.31 30.66 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/13/2009 7.82 82.31 30.72 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/14/2009 7.82 82.31 30.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/15/2009 7.82 82.31 30.84 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/16/2009 7.82 82.31 30.90 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/17/2009 7.82 82.31 30.96 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/18/2009 7.82 82.31 31.02 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/19/2009 7.82 82.31 31.08 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/20/2009 7.82 82.31 31.14 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/21/2009 7.82 82.31 31.20 21.40 19.96 0.00
5 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
12/22/2009 7.82 82.31 31.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/23/2009 7.82 82.31 31.32 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/24/2009 7.82 82.31 31.38 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/25/2009 7.82 82.31 31.44 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/26/2009 7.82 82.31 31.50 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/27/2009 7.82 82.31 31.56 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/28/2009 7.82 82.31 31.62 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/29/2009 7.82 82.31 31.68 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/30/2009 7.82 82.31 31.74 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/31/2009 7.82 82.31 31.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/1/2010 9.94 82.31 26.70 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/2/2010 9.94 82.31 26.75 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/3/2010 9.94 82.31 26.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/4/2010 9.94 82.31 26.86 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/5/2010 9.94 82.31 26.91 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/6/2010 9.94 82.31 26.97 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/7/2010 9.94 82.31 27.02 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/8/2010 9.94 82.31 27.07 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/9/2010 9.94 82.31 27.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/10/2010 9.94 82.31 27.18 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/11/2010 9.94 82.31 27.23 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/12/2010 9.94 82.31 27.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/13/2010 9.94 82.31 27.34 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/14/2010 9.94 82.31 27.39 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/15/2010 9.94 82.31 27.45 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/16/2010 9.94 82.31 27.50 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/17/2010 9.94 82.31 27.55 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/18/2010 9.94 82.31 27.61 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/19/2010 9.94 82.31 27.66 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/20/2010 9.94 82.31 27.71 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/21/2010 9.94 82.31 27.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/22/2010 9.94 82.31 27.82 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/23/2010 9.94 82.31 27.87 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/24/2010 9.94 82.31 27.92 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/25/2010 9.94 82.31 27.98 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/26/2010 9.94 82.31 28.03 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/27/2010 9.94 82.31 28.08 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/28/2010 9.94 82.31 28.14 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/29/2010 9.94 82.31 28.19 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/30/2010 9.94 82.31 28.24 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/31/2010 9.94 82.31 28.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/1/2010 8.88 82.31 26.52 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/2/2010 8.88 82.31 26.57 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/3/2010 8.88 82.31 26.62 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/4/2010 8.88 82.31 26.67 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/5/2010 8.88 82.31 26.72 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/6/2010 8.88 82.31 26.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
6 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
2/7/2010 8.88 82.31 26.82 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/8/2010 8.88 82.31 26.86 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/9/2010 8.88 82.31 26.89 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/10/2010 8.88 82.31 26.92 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/11/2010 8.88 82.31 26.95 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/12/2010 8.88 82.31 26.99 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/13/2010 8.88 82.31 27.02 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/14/2010 8.88 82.31 27.05 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/15/2010 8.88 82.31 27.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/16/2010 8.88 82.31 27.12 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/17/2010 8.88 82.31 27.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/18/2010 8.88 82.31 27.18 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/19/2010 8.88 82.31 27.22 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/20/2010 8.88 82.31 27.25 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/21/2010 8.88 82.31 27.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/22/2010 8.88 82.31 27.32 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/23/2010 8.88 82.31 27.35 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/24/2010 8.88 82.31 27.38 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/25/2010 8.88 82.31 27.41 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/26/2010 8.88 82.31 27.45 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/27/2010 8.88 82.31 27.48 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/28/2010 8.88 82.31 27.51 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/1/2010 15.85 82.31 29.44 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/2/2010 15.85 82.31 29.48 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/3/2010 15.85 82.31 29.52 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/4/2010 15.85 82.31 29.56 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/5/2010 15.85 82.31 29.59 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/6/2010 15.85 82.31 29.63 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/7/2010 15.85 82.31 29.67 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/8/2010 15.85 82.31 29.70 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/9/2010 15.85 82.31 29.74 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/10/2010 15.85 82.31 29.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/11/2010 15.85 82.31 29.82 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/12/2010 15.85 82.31 29.85 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/13/2010 15.85 82.31 29.89 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/14/2010 15.85 82.31 29.93 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/15/2010 15.85 82.31 29.96 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/16/2010 15.85 82.31 30.00 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/17/2010 15.85 82.31 30.04 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/18/2010 15.85 82.31 30.08 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/19/2010 15.85 82.31 30.11 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/20/2010 15.85 82.31 30.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/21/2010 15.85 82.31 30.19 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/22/2010 15.85 82.31 30.22 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/23/2010 15.85 82.31 30.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/24/2010 15.85 82.31 30.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/25/2010 15.85 82.31 30.33 21.40 19.96 0.00
7 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
3/26/2010 15.85 82.31 30.37 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/27/2010 15.85 82.31 30.41 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/28/2010 15.85 82.31 30.45 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/29/2010 15.85 82.31 30.48 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/30/2010 15.85 82.31 30.52 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/31/2010 15.85 82.31 30.56 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/1/2010 2.11 82.31 31.58 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/2/2010 2.11 82.31 31.61 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/3/2010 2.11 82.31 31.64 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/4/2010 2.11 82.31 31.68 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/5/2010 2.11 82.31 31.71 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/6/2010 2.11 82.31 31.74 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/7/2010 2.11 82.31 31.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/8/2010 2.11 82.31 31.81 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/9/2010 2.11 82.31 31.84 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/10/2010 2.11 82.31 31.87 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/11/2010 2.11 82.31 31.90 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/12/2010 2.11 82.31 31.93 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/13/2010 2.11 82.31 31.97 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/14/2010 2.11 82.31 32.00 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/15/2010 2.11 82.31 32.03 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/16/2010 2.11 82.31 32.06 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/17/2010 2.11 82.31 32.10 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/18/2010 2.11 82.31 32.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/19/2010 2.11 82.31 32.16 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/20/2010 2.11 82.31 32.19 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/21/2010 2.11 82.31 32.22 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/22/2010 2.11 82.31 32.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/23/2010 2.11 82.31 32.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/24/2010 2.11 82.31 32.32 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/25/2010 2.11 82.31 32.35 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/26/2010 2.11 82.31 32.38 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/27/2010 2.11 82.31 32.42 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/28/2010 2.11 82.31 32.45 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/29/2010 2.11 82.31 32.48 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/30/2010 2.11 82.31 32.51 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/1/2010 3.80 82.31 37.63 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/2/2010 3.80 82.31 37.67 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/3/2010 3.80 82.31 37.70 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/4/2010 3.80 82.31 37.74 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/5/2010 3.80 82.31 37.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/6/2010 3.80 82.31 37.81 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/7/2010 3.80 82.31 37.84 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/8/2010 3.80 82.31 37.88 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/9/2010 3.80 82.31 37.92 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/10/2010 3.80 82.31 37.95 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/11/2010 3.80 82.31 37.99 21.40 19.96 0.00
8 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
5/12/2010 3.80 82.31 38.02 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/13/2010 3.80 82.31 38.06 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/14/2010 3.80 82.31 38.10 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/15/2010 3.80 82.31 38.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/16/2010 3.80 82.31 38.17 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/17/2010 3.80 82.31 38.20 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/18/2010 3.80 82.31 38.24 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/19/2010 3.80 82.31 38.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/20/2010 3.80 82.31 38.31 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/21/2010 3.80 82.31 38.34 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/22/2010 3.80 82.31 38.38 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/23/2010 3.80 82.31 38.42 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/24/2010 3.80 82.31 38.45 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/25/2010 3.80 82.31 38.49 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/26/2010 3.80 82.31 38.52 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/27/2010 3.80 82.31 38.56 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/28/2010 3.80 82.31 38.59 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/29/2010 3.80 82.31 38.63 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/30/2010 3.80 82.31 38.67 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/31/2010 3.80 82.31 38.70 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/1/2010 5.28 82.31 53.39 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/2/2010 5.28 82.31 53.44 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/3/2010 5.28 82.31 53.48 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/4/2010 5.28 82.31 53.52 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/5/2010 5.28 82.31 53.56 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/6/2010 5.28 82.31 53.61 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/7/2010 5.28 82.31 53.65 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/8/2010 5.28 82.31 53.69 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/9/2010 5.28 82.31 53.73 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/10/2010 5.28 82.31 53.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/11/2010 5.28 82.31 53.82 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/12/2010 5.28 82.31 53.86 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/13/2010 5.28 82.31 53.90 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/14/2010 5.28 82.31 53.94 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/15/2010 5.28 82.31 53.99 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/16/2010 5.28 82.31 54.03 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/17/2010 5.28 82.31 54.07 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/18/2010 5.28 82.31 54.11 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/19/2010 5.28 82.31 54.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/20/2010 5.28 82.31 54.20 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/21/2010 5.28 82.31 54.24 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/22/2010 5.28 82.31 54.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/23/2010 5.28 82.31 54.32 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/24/2010 5.28 82.31 54.37 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/25/2010 5.28 82.31 54.41 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/26/2010 5.28 82.31 54.45 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/27/2010 5.28 82.31 54.49 21.40 19.96 0.00
9 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
6/28/2010 5.28 82.31 54.53 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/29/2010 5.28 82.31 54.58 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/30/2010 5.28 82.31 54.62 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/1/2010 6.98 82.31 83.60 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/2/2010 6.98 82.31 83.64 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/3/2010 6.98 82.31 83.68 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/4/2010 6.98 82.31 83.73 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/5/2010 6.98 82.31 83.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/6/2010 6.98 82.31 83.81 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/7/2010 6.98 82.31 83.86 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/8/2010 6.98 82.31 83.90 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/9/2010 6.98 82.31 83.94 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/10/2010 6.98 82.31 83.99 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/11/2010 6.98 82.31 84.03 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/12/2010 6.98 82.31 84.07 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/13/2010 6.98 82.31 84.12 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/14/2010 6.98 82.31 84.16 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/15/2010 6.98 82.31 84.20 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/16/2010 6.98 82.31 84.25 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/17/2010 6.98 82.31 84.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/18/2010 6.98 82.31 84.33 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/19/2010 6.98 82.31 84.38 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/20/2010 6.98 82.31 84.42 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/21/2010 6.98 82.31 84.46 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/22/2010 6.98 82.31 84.51 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/23/2010 6.98 82.31 84.55 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/24/2010 6.98 82.31 84.59 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/25/2010 6.98 82.31 84.64 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/26/2010 6.98 82.31 84.68 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/27/2010 6.98 82.31 84.72 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/28/2010 6.98 82.31 84.76 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/29/2010 6.98 82.31 84.81 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/30/2010 6.98 82.31 84.85 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/31/2010 6.98 82.31 84.89 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/1/2010 23.68 82.31 104.53 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/2/2010 23.68 82.31 104.60 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/3/2010 23.68 82.31 104.66 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/4/2010 23.68 82.31 104.72 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/5/2010 23.68 82.31 104.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/6/2010 23.68 82.31 104.84 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/7/2010 23.68 82.31 104.90 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/8/2010 23.68 82.31 104.97 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/9/2010 23.68 82.31 105.03 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/10/2010 23.68 82.31 105.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/11/2010 23.68 82.31 105.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/12/2010 23.68 82.31 105.21 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/13/2010 23.68 82.31 105.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
10 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
8/14/2010 23.68 82.31 105.33 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/15/2010 23.68 82.31 105.40 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/16/2010 23.68 82.31 105.46 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/17/2010 23.68 82.31 105.52 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/18/2010 23.68 82.31 105.58 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/19/2010 23.68 82.31 105.64 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/20/2010 23.68 82.31 105.70 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/21/2010 23.68 82.31 105.76 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/22/2010 23.68 82.31 105.82 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/23/2010 23.68 82.31 105.88 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/24/2010 23.68 82.31 105.94 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/25/2010 23.68 82.31 106.00 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/26/2010 23.68 82.31 106.06 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/27/2010 23.68 82.31 106.12 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/28/2010 23.68 82.31 106.19 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/29/2010 23.68 82.31 106.25 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/30/2010 23.68 82.31 106.31 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/31/2010 23.68 82.31 106.37 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/1/2010 24.52 82.31 106.43 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/2/2010 24.52 82.31 106.49 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/3/2010 24.52 82.31 106.55 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/4/2010 24.52 82.31 106.61 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/5/2010 24.52 82.31 106.67 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/6/2010 24.52 82.31 106.73 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/7/2010 24.52 82.31 106.79 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/8/2010 24.52 82.31 106.85 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/9/2010 24.52 82.31 106.92 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/10/2010 24.52 82.31 106.98 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/11/2010 24.52 82.31 107.04 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/12/2010 24.52 82.31 107.10 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/13/2010 24.52 82.31 107.16 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/14/2010 24.52 82.31 107.22 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/15/2010 24.52 82.31 107.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/16/2010 24.52 82.31 107.34 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/17/2010 24.52 82.31 107.40 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/18/2010 24.52 82.31 107.46 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/19/2010 24.52 82.31 107.52 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/20/2010 24.52 82.31 107.58 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/21/2010 24.52 82.31 107.64 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/22/2010 24.52 82.31 107.70 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/23/2010 24.52 82.31 107.76 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/24/2010 24.52 82.31 107.82 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/25/2010 24.52 82.31 107.88 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/26/2010 24.52 82.31 107.94 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/27/2010 24.52 82.31 108.00 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/28/2010 24.52 82.31 108.06 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/29/2010 24.52 82.31 108.12 21.40 19.96 0.00
11 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
9/30/2010 24.52 82.31 108.18 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/1/2010 20.72 82.31 91.33 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/2/2010 20.72 82.31 91.39 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/3/2010 20.72 82.31 91.45 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/4/2010 20.72 82.31 91.51 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/5/2010 20.72 82.31 91.57 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/6/2010 20.72 82.31 91.62 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/7/2010 20.72 82.31 91.68 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/8/2010 20.72 82.31 91.74 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/9/2010 20.72 82.31 91.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/10/2010 20.72 82.31 91.86 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/11/2010 20.72 82.31 91.92 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/12/2010 20.72 82.31 91.98 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/13/2010 20.72 82.31 92.03 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/14/2010 20.72 82.31 92.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/15/2010 20.72 82.31 92.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/16/2010 20.72 82.31 92.21 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/17/2010 20.72 82.31 92.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/18/2010 20.72 82.31 92.33 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/19/2010 20.72 82.31 92.38 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/20/2010 20.72 82.31 92.44 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/21/2010 20.72 82.31 92.50 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/22/2010 20.72 82.31 92.56 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/23/2010 20.72 82.31 92.62 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/24/2010 20.72 82.31 92.67 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/25/2010 20.72 82.31 92.73 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/26/2010 20.72 82.31 92.79 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/27/2010 20.72 82.31 92.85 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/28/2010 20.72 82.31 92.90 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/29/2010 20.72 82.31 92.96 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/30/2010 20.72 82.31 93.02 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/31/2010 20.72 82.31 93.08 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/1/2010 12.90 82.31 64.39 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/2/2010 12.90 82.31 64.44 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/3/2010 12.90 82.31 64.48 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/4/2010 12.90 82.31 64.53 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/5/2010 12.90 82.31 64.57 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/6/2010 12.90 82.31 64.62 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/7/2010 12.90 82.31 64.67 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/8/2010 12.90 82.31 64.71 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/9/2010 12.90 82.31 64.76 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/10/2010 12.90 82.31 64.81 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/11/2010 12.90 82.31 64.85 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/12/2010 12.90 82.31 64.90 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/13/2010 12.90 82.31 64.94 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/14/2010 12.90 82.31 64.99 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/15/2010 12.90 82.31 65.04 21.40 19.96 0.00
12 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
11/16/2010 12.90 82.31 65.08 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/17/2010 12.90 82.31 65.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/18/2010 12.90 82.31 65.17 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/19/2010 12.90 82.31 65.22 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/20/2010 12.90 82.31 65.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/21/2010 12.90 82.31 65.31 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/22/2010 12.90 82.31 65.36 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/23/2010 12.90 82.31 65.40 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/24/2010 12.90 82.31 65.45 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/25/2010 12.90 82.31 65.49 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/26/2010 12.90 82.31 65.54 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/27/2010 12.90 82.31 65.58 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/28/2010 12.90 82.31 65.63 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/29/2010 12.90 82.31 65.68 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/30/2010 12.90 82.31 65.72 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/1/2010 7.82 82.31 43.45 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/2/2010 7.82 82.31 43.49 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/3/2010 7.82 82.31 43.52 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/4/2010 7.82 82.31 43.56 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/5/2010 7.82 82.31 43.60 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/6/2010 7.82 82.31 43.63 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/7/2010 7.82 82.31 43.67 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/8/2010 7.82 82.31 43.70 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/9/2010 7.82 82.31 43.74 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/10/2010 7.82 82.31 43.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/11/2010 7.82 82.31 43.81 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/12/2010 7.82 82.31 43.84 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/13/2010 7.82 82.31 43.88 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/14/2010 7.82 82.31 43.92 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/15/2010 7.82 82.31 43.95 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/16/2010 7.82 82.31 43.99 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/17/2010 7.82 82.31 44.02 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/18/2010 7.82 82.31 44.06 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/19/2010 7.82 82.31 44.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/20/2010 7.82 82.31 44.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/21/2010 7.82 82.31 44.16 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/22/2010 7.82 82.31 44.20 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/23/2010 7.82 82.31 44.23 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/24/2010 7.82 82.31 44.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/25/2010 7.82 82.31 44.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/26/2010 7.82 82.31 44.34 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/27/2010 7.82 82.31 44.38 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/28/2010 7.82 82.31 44.41 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/29/2010 7.82 82.31 44.45 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/30/2010 7.82 82.31 44.48 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/31/2010 7.82 82.31 44.52 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/1/2011 9.94 82.31 37.33 21.40 19.96 0.00
13 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
1/2/2011 9.94 82.31 37.36 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/3/2011 9.94 82.31 37.39 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/4/2011 9.94 82.31 37.42 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/5/2011 9.94 82.31 37.46 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/6/2011 9.94 82.31 37.49 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/7/2011 9.94 82.31 37.52 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/8/2011 9.94 82.31 37.55 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/9/2011 9.94 82.31 37.59 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/10/2011 9.94 82.31 37.62 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/11/2011 9.94 82.31 37.65 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/12/2011 9.94 82.31 37.68 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/13/2011 9.94 82.31 37.72 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/14/2011 9.94 82.31 37.75 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/15/2011 9.94 82.31 37.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/16/2011 9.94 82.31 37.81 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/17/2011 9.94 82.31 37.84 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/18/2011 9.94 82.31 37.88 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/19/2011 9.94 82.31 37.91 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/20/2011 9.94 82.31 37.94 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/21/2011 9.94 82.31 37.97 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/22/2011 9.94 82.31 38.01 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/23/2011 9.94 82.31 38.04 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/24/2011 9.94 82.31 38.07 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/25/2011 9.94 82.31 38.10 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/26/2011 9.94 82.31 38.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/27/2011 9.94 82.31 38.17 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/28/2011 9.94 82.31 38.20 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/29/2011 9.94 82.31 38.23 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/30/2011 9.94 82.31 38.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/31/2011 9.94 82.31 38.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/1/2011 8.88 82.31 35.85 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/2/2011 8.88 82.31 35.89 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/3/2011 8.88 82.31 35.92 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/4/2011 8.88 82.31 35.95 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/5/2011 8.88 82.31 35.98 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/6/2011 8.88 82.31 36.01 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/7/2011 8.88 82.31 36.04 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/8/2011 8.88 82.31 36.07 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/9/2011 8.88 82.31 36.10 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/10/2011 8.88 82.31 36.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/11/2011 8.88 82.31 36.16 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/12/2011 8.88 82.31 36.19 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/13/2011 8.88 82.31 36.22 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/14/2011 8.88 82.31 36.25 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/15/2011 8.88 82.31 36.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/16/2011 8.88 82.31 36.31 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/17/2011 8.88 82.31 36.34 21.40 19.96 0.00
14 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
2/18/2011 8.88 82.31 36.37 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/19/2011 8.88 82.31 36.40 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/20/2011 8.88 82.31 36.43 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/21/2011 8.88 82.31 36.46 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/22/2011 8.88 82.31 36.49 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/23/2011 8.88 82.31 36.52 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/24/2011 8.88 82.31 36.55 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/25/2011 8.88 82.31 36.58 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/26/2011 8.88 82.31 36.61 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/27/2011 8.88 82.31 36.64 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/28/2011 8.88 82.31 36.67 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/1/2011 15.85 82.31 39.23 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/2/2011 15.85 82.31 39.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/3/2011 15.85 82.31 39.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/4/2011 15.85 82.31 39.34 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/5/2011 15.85 82.31 39.37 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/6/2011 15.85 82.31 39.41 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/7/2011 15.85 82.31 39.44 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/8/2011 15.85 82.31 39.47 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/9/2011 15.85 82.31 39.51 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/10/2011 15.85 82.31 39.54 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/11/2011 15.85 82.31 39.58 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/12/2011 15.85 82.31 39.61 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/13/2011 15.85 82.31 39.64 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/14/2011 15.85 82.31 39.68 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/15/2011 15.85 82.31 39.71 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/16/2011 15.85 82.31 39.75 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/17/2011 15.85 82.31 39.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/18/2011 15.85 82.31 39.82 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/19/2011 15.85 82.31 39.85 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/20/2011 15.85 82.31 39.88 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/21/2011 15.85 82.31 39.92 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/22/2011 15.85 82.31 39.95 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/23/2011 15.85 82.31 39.99 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/24/2011 15.85 82.31 40.02 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/25/2011 15.85 82.31 40.05 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/26/2011 15.85 82.31 40.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/27/2011 15.85 82.31 40.12 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/28/2011 15.85 82.31 40.16 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/29/2011 15.85 82.31 40.19 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/30/2011 15.85 82.31 40.22 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/31/2011 15.85 82.31 40.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/1/2011 2.11 82.31 41.59 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/2/2011 2.11 82.31 41.62 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/3/2011 2.11 82.31 41.65 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/4/2011 2.11 82.31 41.68 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/5/2011 2.11 82.31 41.71 21.40 19.96 0.00
15 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
4/6/2011 2.11 82.31 41.74 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/7/2011 2.11 82.31 41.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/8/2011 2.11 82.31 41.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/9/2011 2.11 82.31 41.83 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/10/2011 2.11 82.31 41.85 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/11/2011 2.11 82.31 41.88 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/12/2011 2.11 82.31 41.91 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/13/2011 2.11 82.31 41.94 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/14/2011 2.11 82.31 41.97 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/15/2011 2.11 82.31 42.00 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/16/2011 2.11 82.31 42.03 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/17/2011 2.11 82.31 42.06 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/18/2011 2.11 82.31 42.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/19/2011 2.11 82.31 42.12 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/20/2011 2.11 82.31 42.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/21/2011 2.11 82.31 42.17 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/22/2011 2.11 82.31 42.20 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/23/2011 2.11 82.31 42.23 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/24/2011 2.11 82.31 42.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/25/2011 2.11 82.31 42.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/26/2011 2.11 82.31 42.31 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/27/2011 2.11 82.31 42.33 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/28/2011 2.11 82.31 42.34 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/29/2011 2.11 82.31 42.35 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/30/2011 2.11 82.31 42.36 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/1/2011 3.80 82.31 49.00 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/2/2011 3.80 82.31 49.01 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/3/2011 3.80 82.31 49.03 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/4/2011 3.80 82.31 49.04 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/5/2011 3.80 82.31 49.05 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/6/2011 3.80 82.31 49.07 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/7/2011 3.80 82.31 49.08 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/8/2011 3.80 82.31 49.10 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/9/2011 3.80 82.31 49.11 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/10/2011 3.80 82.31 49.12 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/11/2011 3.80 82.31 49.14 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/12/2011 3.80 82.31 49.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/13/2011 3.80 82.31 49.17 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/14/2011 3.80 82.31 49.18 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/15/2011 3.80 82.31 49.19 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/16/2011 3.80 82.31 49.21 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/17/2011 3.80 82.31 49.22 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/18/2011 3.80 82.31 49.24 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/19/2011 3.80 82.31 49.25 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/20/2011 3.80 82.31 49.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/21/2011 3.80 82.31 49.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/22/2011 3.80 82.31 49.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
16 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
5/23/2011 3.80 82.31 49.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/24/2011 3.80 82.31 49.32 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/25/2011 3.80 82.31 49.33 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/26/2011 3.80 82.31 49.35 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/27/2011 3.80 82.31 49.36 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/28/2011 3.80 82.31 49.37 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/29/2011 3.80 82.31 49.39 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/30/2011 3.80 82.31 49.40 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/31/2011 3.80 82.31 49.42 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/1/2011 5.28 82.31 68.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/2/2011 5.28 82.31 68.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/3/2011 5.28 82.31 68.16 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/4/2011 5.28 82.31 68.18 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/5/2011 5.28 82.31 68.19 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/6/2011 5.28 82.31 68.21 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/7/2011 5.28 82.31 68.22 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/8/2011 5.28 82.31 68.24 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/9/2011 5.28 82.31 68.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/10/2011 5.28 82.31 68.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/11/2011 5.28 82.31 68.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/12/2011 5.28 82.31 68.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/13/2011 5.28 82.31 68.32 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/14/2011 5.28 82.31 68.33 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/15/2011 5.28 82.31 68.35 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/16/2011 5.28 82.31 68.36 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/17/2011 5.28 82.31 68.38 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/18/2011 5.28 82.31 68.39 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/19/2011 5.28 82.31 68.41 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/20/2011 5.28 82.31 68.42 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/21/2011 5.28 82.31 68.44 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/22/2011 5.28 82.31 68.46 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/23/2011 5.28 82.31 68.47 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/24/2011 5.28 82.31 68.49 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/25/2011 5.28 82.31 68.50 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/26/2011 5.28 82.31 68.52 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/27/2011 5.28 82.31 68.53 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/28/2011 5.28 82.31 68.55 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/29/2011 5.28 82.31 68.56 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/30/2011 5.28 82.31 68.58 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/1/2011 6.98 82.31 104.91 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/2/2011 6.98 82.31 104.92 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/3/2011 6.98 82.31 104.93 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/4/2011 6.98 82.31 104.94 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/5/2011 6.98 82.31 104.96 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/6/2011 6.98 82.31 104.97 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/7/2011 6.98 82.31 104.98 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/8/2011 6.98 82.31 104.99 21.40 19.96 0.00
17 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
7/9/2011 6.98 82.31 105.00 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/10/2011 6.98 82.31 105.02 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/11/2011 6.98 82.31 105.03 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/12/2011 6.98 82.31 105.04 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/13/2011 6.98 82.31 105.05 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/14/2011 6.98 82.31 105.06 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/15/2011 6.98 82.31 105.08 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/16/2011 6.98 82.31 105.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/17/2011 6.98 82.31 105.10 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/18/2011 6.98 82.31 105.11 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/19/2011 6.98 82.31 105.12 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/20/2011 6.98 82.31 105.14 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/21/2011 6.98 82.31 105.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/22/2011 6.98 82.31 105.16 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/23/2011 6.98 82.31 105.17 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/24/2011 6.98 82.31 105.18 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/25/2011 6.98 82.31 105.20 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/26/2011 6.98 82.31 105.21 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/27/2011 6.98 82.31 105.22 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/28/2011 6.98 82.31 105.23 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/29/2011 6.98 82.31 105.24 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/30/2011 6.98 82.31 105.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/31/2011 6.98 82.31 105.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/1/2011 23.68 82.31 129.58 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/2/2011 23.68 82.31 129.59 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/3/2011 23.68 82.31 129.61 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/4/2011 23.68 82.31 129.63 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/5/2011 23.68 82.31 129.64 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/6/2011 23.68 82.31 129.66 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/7/2011 23.68 82.31 129.68 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/8/2011 23.68 82.31 129.69 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/9/2011 23.68 82.31 129.71 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/10/2011 23.68 82.31 129.73 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/11/2011 23.68 82.31 129.74 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/12/2011 23.68 82.31 129.76 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/13/2011 23.68 82.31 129.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/14/2011 23.68 82.31 129.79 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/15/2011 23.68 82.31 129.81 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/16/2011 23.68 82.31 129.83 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/17/2011 23.68 82.31 129.85 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/18/2011 23.68 82.31 129.86 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/19/2011 23.68 82.31 129.88 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/20/2011 23.68 82.31 129.90 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/21/2011 23.68 82.31 129.91 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/22/2011 23.68 82.31 129.93 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/23/2011 23.68 82.31 129.95 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/24/2011 23.68 82.31 129.96 21.40 19.96 0.00
18 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
8/25/2011 23.68 82.31 129.98 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/26/2011 23.68 82.31 130.00 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/27/2011 23.68 82.31 130.01 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/28/2011 23.68 82.31 130.03 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/29/2011 23.68 82.31 130.05 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/30/2011 23.68 82.31 130.06 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/31/2011 23.68 82.31 130.08 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/1/2011 24.52 82.31 130.10 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/2/2011 24.52 82.31 130.11 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/3/2011 24.52 82.31 130.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/4/2011 24.52 82.31 130.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/5/2011 24.52 82.31 130.17 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/6/2011 24.52 82.31 130.18 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/7/2011 24.52 82.31 130.20 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/8/2011 24.52 82.31 130.22 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/9/2011 24.52 82.31 130.23 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/10/2011 24.52 82.31 130.25 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/11/2011 24.52 82.31 130.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/12/2011 24.52 82.31 130.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/13/2011 24.52 82.31 130.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/14/2011 24.52 82.31 130.32 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/15/2011 24.52 82.31 130.34 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/16/2011 24.52 82.31 130.35 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/17/2011 24.52 82.31 130.37 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/18/2011 24.52 82.31 130.39 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/19/2011 24.52 82.31 130.41 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/20/2011 24.52 82.31 130.42 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/21/2011 24.52 82.31 130.44 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/22/2011 24.52 82.31 130.46 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/23/2011 24.52 82.31 130.47 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/24/2011 24.52 82.31 130.49 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/25/2011 24.52 82.31 130.51 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/26/2011 24.52 82.31 130.53 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/27/2011 24.52 82.31 130.54 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/28/2011 24.52 82.31 130.56 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/29/2011 24.52 82.31 130.58 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/30/2011 24.52 82.31 130.59 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/1/2011 20.72 82.31 110.20 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/2/2011 20.72 82.31 110.22 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/3/2011 20.72 82.31 110.24 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/4/2011 20.72 82.31 110.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/5/2011 20.72 82.31 110.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/6/2011 20.72 82.31 110.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/7/2011 20.72 82.31 110.32 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/8/2011 20.72 82.31 110.34 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/9/2011 20.72 82.31 110.36 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/10/2011 20.72 82.31 110.38 21.40 19.96 0.00
19 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
10/11/2011 20.72 82.31 110.40 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/12/2011 20.72 82.31 110.41 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/13/2011 20.72 82.31 110.43 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/14/2011 20.72 82.31 110.45 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/15/2011 20.72 82.31 110.47 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/16/2011 20.72 82.31 110.49 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/17/2011 20.72 82.31 110.51 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/18/2011 20.72 82.31 110.53 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/19/2011 20.72 82.31 110.55 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/20/2011 20.72 82.31 110.57 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/21/2011 20.72 82.31 110.59 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/22/2011 20.72 82.31 110.61 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/23/2011 20.72 82.31 110.63 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/24/2011 20.72 82.31 110.65 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/25/2011 20.72 82.31 110.66 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/26/2011 20.72 82.31 110.68 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/27/2011 20.72 82.31 110.70 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/28/2011 20.72 82.31 110.72 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/29/2011 20.72 82.31 110.74 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/30/2011 20.72 82.31 110.76 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/31/2011 20.72 82.31 110.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/1/2011 12.90 82.31 76.60 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/2/2011 12.90 82.31 76.62 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/3/2011 12.90 82.31 76.64 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/4/2011 12.90 82.31 76.65 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/5/2011 12.90 82.31 76.67 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/6/2011 12.90 82.31 76.69 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/7/2011 12.90 82.31 76.71 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/8/2011 12.90 82.31 76.72 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/9/2011 12.90 82.31 76.74 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/10/2011 12.90 82.31 76.76 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/11/2011 12.90 82.31 76.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/12/2011 12.90 82.31 76.79 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/13/2011 12.90 82.31 76.81 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/14/2011 12.90 82.31 76.83 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/15/2011 12.90 82.31 76.84 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/16/2011 12.90 82.31 76.86 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/17/2011 12.90 82.31 76.88 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/18/2011 12.90 82.31 76.90 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/19/2011 12.90 82.31 76.91 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/20/2011 12.90 82.31 76.93 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/21/2011 12.90 82.31 76.95 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/22/2011 12.90 82.31 76.97 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/23/2011 12.90 82.31 76.98 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/24/2011 12.90 82.31 77.00 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/25/2011 12.90 82.31 77.02 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/26/2011 12.90 82.31 77.03 21.40 19.96 0.00
20 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
11/27/2011 12.90 82.31 77.05 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/28/2011 12.90 82.31 77.07 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/29/2011 12.90 82.31 77.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/30/2011 12.90 82.31 77.10 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/1/2011 7.82 82.31 50.96 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/2/2011 7.82 82.31 50.97 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/3/2011 7.82 82.31 50.98 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/4/2011 7.82 82.31 51.00 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/5/2011 7.82 82.31 51.01 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/6/2011 7.82 82.31 51.03 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/7/2011 7.82 82.31 51.04 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/8/2011 7.82 82.31 51.06 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/9/2011 7.82 82.31 51.07 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/10/2011 7.82 82.31 51.08 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/11/2011 7.82 82.31 51.10 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/12/2011 7.82 82.31 51.11 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/13/2011 7.82 82.31 51.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/14/2011 7.82 82.31 51.14 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/15/2011 7.82 82.31 51.16 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/16/2011 7.82 82.31 51.17 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/17/2011 7.82 82.31 51.19 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/18/2011 7.82 82.31 51.20 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/19/2011 7.82 82.31 51.21 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/20/2011 7.82 82.31 51.23 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/21/2011 7.82 82.31 51.24 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/22/2011 7.82 82.31 51.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/23/2011 7.82 82.31 51.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/24/2011 7.82 82.31 51.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/25/2011 7.82 82.31 51.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/26/2011 7.82 82.31 51.31 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/27/2011 7.82 82.31 51.33 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/28/2011 7.82 82.31 51.34 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/29/2011 7.82 82.31 51.36 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/30/2011 7.82 82.31 51.37 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/31/2011 7.82 82.31 51.39 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/1/2012 9.94 82.31 43.07 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/2/2012 9.94 82.31 43.08 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/3/2012 9.94 82.31 43.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/4/2012 9.94 82.31 43.11 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/5/2012 9.94 82.31 43.12 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/6/2012 9.94 82.31 43.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/7/2012 9.94 82.31 43.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/8/2012 9.94 82.31 43.16 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/9/2012 9.94 82.31 43.17 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/10/2012 9.94 82.31 43.19 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/11/2012 9.94 82.31 43.20 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/12/2012 9.94 82.31 43.21 21.40 19.96 0.00
21 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
1/13/2012 9.94 82.31 43.23 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/14/2012 9.94 82.31 43.24 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/15/2012 9.94 82.31 43.25 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/16/2012 9.94 82.31 43.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/17/2012 9.94 82.31 43.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/18/2012 9.94 82.31 43.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/19/2012 9.94 82.31 43.31 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/20/2012 9.94 82.31 43.32 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/21/2012 9.94 82.31 43.33 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/22/2012 9.94 82.31 43.35 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/23/2012 9.94 82.31 43.36 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/24/2012 9.94 82.31 43.37 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/25/2012 9.94 82.31 43.39 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/26/2012 9.94 82.31 43.40 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/27/2012 9.94 82.31 43.41 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/28/2012 9.94 82.31 43.43 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/29/2012 9.94 82.31 43.44 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/30/2012 9.94 82.31 43.45 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/31/2012 9.94 82.31 43.47 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/1/2012 8.88 82.31 40.68 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/2/2012 8.88 82.31 40.69 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/3/2012 8.88 82.31 40.70 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/4/2012 8.88 82.31 40.71 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/5/2012 8.88 82.31 40.73 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/6/2012 8.88 82.31 40.74 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/7/2012 8.88 82.31 40.75 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/8/2012 8.88 82.31 40.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/9/2012 8.88 82.31 40.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/10/2012 8.88 82.31 40.79 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/11/2012 8.88 82.31 40.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/12/2012 8.88 82.31 40.82 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/13/2012 8.88 82.31 40.83 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/14/2012 8.88 82.31 40.84 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/15/2012 8.88 82.31 40.85 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/16/2012 8.88 82.31 40.87 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/17/2012 8.88 82.31 40.88 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/18/2012 8.88 82.31 40.89 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/19/2012 8.88 82.31 40.91 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/20/2012 8.88 82.31 40.92 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/21/2012 8.88 82.31 40.93 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/22/2012 8.88 82.31 40.94 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/23/2012 8.88 82.31 40.96 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/24/2012 8.88 82.31 40.97 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/25/2012 8.88 82.31 40.98 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/26/2012 8.88 82.31 40.99 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/27/2012 8.88 82.31 41.01 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/28/2012 8.88 82.31 41.02 21.40 19.96 0.00
22 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
2/29/2012 8.88 82.31 41.03 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/1/2012 15.85 82.31 43.88 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/2/2012 15.85 82.31 43.89 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/3/2012 15.85 82.31 43.90 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/4/2012 15.85 82.31 43.92 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/5/2012 15.85 82.31 43.93 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/6/2012 15.85 82.31 43.95 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/7/2012 15.85 82.31 43.96 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/8/2012 15.85 82.31 43.98 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/9/2012 15.85 82.31 43.99 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/10/2012 15.85 82.31 44.00 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/11/2012 15.85 82.31 44.02 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/12/2012 15.85 82.31 44.03 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/13/2012 15.85 82.31 44.05 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/14/2012 15.85 82.31 44.06 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/15/2012 15.85 82.31 44.08 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/16/2012 15.85 82.31 44.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/17/2012 15.85 82.31 44.11 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/18/2012 15.85 82.31 44.12 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/19/2012 15.85 82.31 44.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/20/2012 15.85 82.31 44.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/21/2012 15.85 82.31 44.16 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/22/2012 15.85 82.31 44.18 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/23/2012 15.85 82.31 44.19 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/24/2012 15.85 82.31 44.21 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/25/2012 15.85 82.31 44.22 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/26/2012 15.85 82.31 44.23 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/27/2012 15.85 82.31 44.25 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/28/2012 15.85 82.31 44.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/29/2012 15.85 82.31 44.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/30/2012 15.85 82.31 44.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/31/2012 15.85 82.31 44.31 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/1/2012 2.11 82.31 45.75 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/2/2012 2.11 82.31 45.76 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/3/2012 2.11 82.31 45.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/4/2012 2.11 82.31 45.79 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/5/2012 2.11 82.31 45.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/6/2012 2.11 82.31 45.81 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/7/2012 2.11 82.31 45.82 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/8/2012 2.11 82.31 45.84 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/9/2012 2.11 82.31 45.85 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/10/2012 2.11 82.31 45.86 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/11/2012 2.11 82.31 45.87 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/12/2012 2.11 82.31 45.88 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/13/2012 2.11 82.31 45.90 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/14/2012 2.11 82.31 45.91 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/15/2012 2.11 82.31 45.92 21.40 19.96 0.00
23 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
4/16/2012 2.11 82.31 45.93 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/17/2012 2.11 82.31 45.95 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/18/2012 2.11 82.31 45.96 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/19/2012 2.11 82.31 45.97 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/20/2012 2.11 82.31 45.98 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/21/2012 2.11 82.31 45.99 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/22/2012 2.11 82.31 46.01 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/23/2012 2.11 82.31 46.02 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/24/2012 2.11 82.31 46.03 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/25/2012 2.11 82.31 46.04 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/26/2012 2.11 82.31 46.06 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/27/2012 2.11 82.31 46.07 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/28/2012 2.11 82.31 46.08 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/29/2012 2.11 82.31 46.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/30/2012 2.11 82.31 46.10 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/1/2012 3.80 82.31 53.32 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/2/2012 3.80 82.31 53.34 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/3/2012 3.80 82.31 53.35 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/4/2012 3.80 82.31 53.36 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/5/2012 3.80 82.31 53.38 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/6/2012 3.80 82.31 53.39 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/7/2012 3.80 82.31 53.40 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/8/2012 3.80 82.31 53.41 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/9/2012 3.80 82.31 53.43 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/10/2012 3.80 82.31 53.44 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/11/2012 3.80 82.31 53.45 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/12/2012 3.80 82.31 53.47 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/13/2012 3.80 82.31 53.48 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/14/2012 3.80 82.31 53.49 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/15/2012 3.80 82.31 53.51 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/16/2012 3.80 82.31 53.52 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/17/2012 3.80 82.31 53.53 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/18/2012 3.80 82.31 53.55 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/19/2012 3.80 82.31 53.56 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/20/2012 3.80 82.31 53.57 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/21/2012 3.80 82.31 53.59 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/22/2012 3.80 82.31 53.60 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/23/2012 3.80 82.31 53.61 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/24/2012 3.80 82.31 53.63 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/25/2012 3.80 82.31 53.64 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/26/2012 3.80 82.31 53.65 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/27/2012 3.80 82.31 53.67 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/28/2012 3.80 82.31 53.68 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/29/2012 3.80 82.31 53.69 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/30/2012 3.80 82.31 53.71 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/31/2012 3.80 82.31 53.72 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/1/2012 5.28 82.31 74.06 21.40 19.96 0.00
24 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
6/2/2012 5.28 82.31 74.08 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/3/2012 5.28 82.31 74.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/4/2012 5.28 82.31 74.11 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/5/2012 5.28 82.31 74.12 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/6/2012 5.28 82.31 74.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/7/2012 5.28 82.31 74.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/8/2012 5.28 82.31 74.16 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/9/2012 5.28 82.31 74.18 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/10/2012 5.28 82.31 74.19 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/11/2012 5.28 82.31 74.20 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/12/2012 5.28 82.31 74.22 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/13/2012 5.28 82.31 74.23 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/14/2012 5.28 82.31 74.25 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/15/2012 5.28 82.31 74.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/16/2012 5.28 82.31 74.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/17/2012 5.28 82.31 74.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/18/2012 5.28 82.31 74.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/19/2012 5.28 82.31 74.32 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/20/2012 5.28 82.31 74.33 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/21/2012 5.28 82.31 74.35 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/22/2012 5.28 82.31 74.36 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/23/2012 5.28 82.31 74.37 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/24/2012 5.28 82.31 74.39 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/25/2012 5.28 82.31 74.40 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/26/2012 5.28 82.31 74.42 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/27/2012 5.28 82.31 74.43 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/28/2012 5.28 82.31 74.44 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/29/2012 5.28 82.31 74.46 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/30/2012 5.28 82.31 74.47 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/1/2012 6.98 82.31 113.92 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/2/2012 6.98 82.31 113.93 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/3/2012 6.98 82.31 113.94 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/4/2012 6.98 82.31 113.95 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/5/2012 6.98 82.31 113.96 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/6/2012 6.98 82.31 113.96 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/7/2012 6.98 82.31 113.97 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/8/2012 6.98 82.31 113.98 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/9/2012 6.98 82.31 113.99 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/10/2012 6.98 82.31 114.00 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/11/2012 6.98 82.31 114.01 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/12/2012 6.98 82.31 114.02 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/13/2012 6.98 82.31 114.03 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/14/2012 6.98 82.31 114.04 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/15/2012 6.98 82.31 114.05 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/16/2012 6.98 82.31 114.06 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/17/2012 6.98 82.31 114.06 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/18/2012 6.98 82.31 114.07 21.40 19.96 0.00
25 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
7/19/2012 6.98 82.31 114.08 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/20/2012 6.98 82.31 114.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/21/2012 6.98 82.31 114.10 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/22/2012 6.98 82.31 114.11 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/23/2012 6.98 82.31 114.12 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/24/2012 6.98 82.31 114.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/25/2012 6.98 82.31 114.14 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/26/2012 6.98 82.31 114.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/27/2012 6.98 82.31 114.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/28/2012 6.98 82.31 114.16 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/29/2012 6.98 82.31 114.17 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/30/2012 6.98 82.31 114.18 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/31/2012 6.98 82.31 114.19 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/1/2012 23.68 82.31 140.55 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/2/2012 23.68 82.31 140.57 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/3/2012 23.68 82.31 140.58 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/4/2012 23.68 82.31 140.59 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/5/2012 23.68 82.31 140.60 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/6/2012 23.68 82.31 140.62 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/7/2012 23.68 82.31 140.63 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/8/2012 23.68 82.31 140.64 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/9/2012 23.68 82.31 140.65 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/10/2012 23.68 82.31 140.67 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/11/2012 23.68 82.31 140.68 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/12/2012 23.68 82.31 140.69 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/13/2012 23.68 82.31 140.70 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/14/2012 23.68 82.31 140.72 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/15/2012 23.68 82.31 140.73 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/16/2012 23.68 82.31 140.74 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/17/2012 23.68 82.31 140.75 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/18/2012 23.68 82.31 140.76 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/19/2012 23.68 82.31 140.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/20/2012 23.68 82.31 140.79 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/21/2012 23.68 82.31 140.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/22/2012 23.68 82.31 140.81 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/23/2012 23.68 82.31 140.83 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/24/2012 23.68 82.31 140.84 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/25/2012 23.68 82.31 140.85 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/26/2012 23.68 82.31 140.86 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/27/2012 23.68 82.31 140.88 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/28/2012 23.68 82.31 140.89 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/29/2012 23.68 82.31 140.90 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/30/2012 23.68 82.31 140.91 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/31/2012 23.68 82.31 140.93 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/1/2012 24.52 82.31 140.94 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/2/2012 24.52 82.31 140.95 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/3/2012 24.52 82.31 140.96 21.40 19.96 0.00
26 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
9/4/2012 24.52 82.31 140.98 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/5/2012 24.52 82.31 140.99 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/6/2012 24.52 82.31 141.00 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/7/2012 24.52 82.31 141.01 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/8/2012 24.52 82.31 141.03 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/9/2012 24.52 82.31 141.04 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/10/2012 24.52 82.31 141.05 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/11/2012 24.52 82.31 141.07 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/12/2012 24.52 82.31 141.08 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/13/2012 24.52 82.31 141.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/14/2012 24.52 82.31 141.10 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/15/2012 24.52 82.31 141.12 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/16/2012 24.52 82.31 141.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/17/2012 24.52 82.31 141.14 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/18/2012 24.52 82.31 141.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/19/2012 24.52 82.31 141.17 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/20/2012 24.52 82.31 141.18 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/21/2012 24.52 82.31 141.19 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/22/2012 24.52 82.31 141.21 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/23/2012 24.52 82.31 141.22 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/24/2012 24.52 82.31 141.23 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/25/2012 24.52 82.31 141.24 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/26/2012 24.52 82.31 141.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/27/2012 24.52 82.31 141.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/28/2012 24.52 82.31 141.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/29/2012 24.52 82.31 141.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/30/2012 24.52 82.31 141.31 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/1/2012 20.72 82.31 119.24 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/2/2012 20.72 82.31 119.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/3/2012 20.72 82.31 119.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/4/2012 20.72 82.31 119.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/5/2012 20.72 82.31 119.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/6/2012 20.72 82.31 119.32 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/7/2012 20.72 82.31 119.34 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/8/2012 20.72 82.31 119.35 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/9/2012 20.72 82.31 119.37 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/10/2012 20.72 82.31 119.38 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/11/2012 20.72 82.31 119.40 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/12/2012 20.72 82.31 119.42 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/13/2012 20.72 82.31 119.43 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/14/2012 20.72 82.31 119.45 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/15/2012 20.72 82.31 119.47 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/16/2012 20.72 82.31 119.48 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/17/2012 20.72 82.31 119.50 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/18/2012 20.72 82.31 119.51 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/19/2012 20.72 82.31 119.53 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/20/2012 20.72 82.31 119.55 21.40 19.96 0.00
27 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
10/21/2012 20.72 82.31 119.56 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/22/2012 20.72 82.31 119.58 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/23/2012 20.72 82.31 119.59 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/24/2012 20.72 82.31 119.61 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/25/2012 20.72 82.31 119.63 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/26/2012 20.72 82.31 119.64 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/27/2012 20.72 82.31 119.66 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/28/2012 20.72 82.31 119.67 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/29/2012 20.72 82.31 119.69 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/30/2012 20.72 82.31 119.71 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/31/2012 20.72 82.31 119.72 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/1/2012 12.90 82.31 82.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/2/2012 12.90 82.31 82.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/3/2012 12.90 82.31 82.81 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/4/2012 12.90 82.31 82.83 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/5/2012 12.90 82.31 82.85 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/6/2012 12.90 82.31 82.86 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/7/2012 12.90 82.31 82.88 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/8/2012 12.90 82.31 82.89 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/9/2012 12.90 82.31 82.91 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/10/2012 12.90 82.31 82.93 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/11/2012 12.90 82.31 82.94 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/12/2012 12.90 82.31 82.96 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/13/2012 12.90 82.31 82.97 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/14/2012 12.90 82.31 82.99 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/15/2012 12.90 82.31 83.01 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/16/2012 12.90 82.31 83.02 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/17/2012 12.90 82.31 83.04 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/18/2012 12.90 82.31 83.05 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/19/2012 12.90 82.31 83.07 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/20/2012 12.90 82.31 83.08 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/21/2012 12.90 82.31 83.10 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/22/2012 12.90 82.31 83.12 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/23/2012 12.90 82.31 83.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/24/2012 12.90 82.31 83.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/25/2012 12.90 82.31 83.16 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/26/2012 12.90 82.31 83.18 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/27/2012 12.90 82.31 83.20 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/28/2012 12.90 82.31 83.21 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/29/2012 12.90 82.31 83.23 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/30/2012 12.90 82.31 83.24 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/1/2012 7.82 82.31 55.01 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/2/2012 7.82 82.31 55.02 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/3/2012 7.82 82.31 55.04 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/4/2012 7.82 82.31 55.05 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/5/2012 7.82 82.31 55.07 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/6/2012 7.82 82.31 55.08 21.40 19.96 0.00
28 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
12/7/2012 7.82 82.31 55.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/8/2012 7.82 82.31 55.11 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/9/2012 7.82 82.31 55.12 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/10/2012 7.82 82.31 55.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/11/2012 7.82 82.31 55.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/12/2012 7.82 82.31 55.16 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/13/2012 7.82 82.31 55.18 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/14/2012 7.82 82.31 55.19 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/15/2012 7.82 82.31 55.20 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/16/2012 7.82 82.31 55.22 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/17/2012 7.82 82.31 55.23 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/18/2012 7.82 82.31 55.24 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/19/2012 7.82 82.31 55.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/20/2012 7.82 82.31 55.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/21/2012 7.82 82.31 55.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/22/2012 7.82 82.31 55.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/23/2012 7.82 82.31 55.31 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/24/2012 7.82 82.31 55.33 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/25/2012 7.82 82.31 55.34 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/26/2012 7.82 82.31 55.35 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/27/2012 7.82 82.31 55.37 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/28/2012 7.82 82.31 55.38 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/29/2012 7.82 82.31 55.40 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/30/2012 7.82 82.31 55.41 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/31/2012 7.82 82.31 55.42 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/1/2013 9.94 82.31 46.45 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/2/2013 9.94 82.31 46.46 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/3/2013 9.94 82.31 46.47 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/4/2013 9.94 82.31 46.49 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/5/2013 9.94 82.31 46.50 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/6/2013 9.94 82.31 46.51 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/7/2013 9.94 82.31 46.52 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/8/2013 9.94 82.31 46.54 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/9/2013 9.94 82.31 46.55 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/10/2013 9.94 82.31 46.56 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/11/2013 9.94 82.31 46.58 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/12/2013 9.94 82.31 46.59 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/13/2013 9.94 82.31 46.60 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/14/2013 9.94 82.31 46.62 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/15/2013 9.94 82.31 46.63 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/16/2013 9.94 82.31 46.64 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/17/2013 9.94 82.31 46.65 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/18/2013 9.94 82.31 46.67 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/19/2013 9.94 82.31 46.68 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/20/2013 9.94 82.31 46.69 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/21/2013 9.94 82.31 46.71 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/22/2013 9.94 82.31 46.72 21.40 19.96 0.00
29 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
1/23/2013 9.94 82.31 46.73 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/24/2013 9.94 82.31 46.75 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/25/2013 9.94 82.31 46.76 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/26/2013 9.94 82.31 46.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/27/2013 9.94 82.31 46.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/28/2013 9.94 82.31 46.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/29/2013 9.94 82.31 46.81 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/30/2013 9.94 82.31 46.82 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/31/2013 9.94 82.31 46.84 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/1/2013 8.88 82.31 43.83 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/2/2013 8.88 82.31 43.84 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/3/2013 8.88 82.31 43.85 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/4/2013 8.88 82.31 43.86 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/5/2013 8.88 82.31 43.88 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/6/2013 8.88 82.31 43.89 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/7/2013 8.88 82.31 43.90 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/8/2013 8.88 82.31 43.91 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/9/2013 8.88 82.31 43.93 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/10/2013 8.88 82.31 43.94 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/11/2013 8.88 82.31 43.95 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/12/2013 8.88 82.31 43.96 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/13/2013 8.88 82.31 43.97 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/14/2013 8.88 82.31 43.99 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/15/2013 8.88 82.31 44.00 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/16/2013 8.88 82.31 44.01 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/17/2013 8.88 82.31 44.02 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/18/2013 8.88 82.31 44.04 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/19/2013 8.88 82.31 44.05 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/20/2013 8.88 82.31 44.06 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/21/2013 8.88 82.31 44.07 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/22/2013 8.88 82.31 44.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/23/2013 8.88 82.31 44.10 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/24/2013 8.88 82.31 44.11 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/25/2013 8.88 82.31 44.12 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/26/2013 8.88 82.31 44.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/27/2013 8.88 82.31 44.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/28/2013 8.88 82.31 44.16 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/1/2013 15.85 82.31 47.22 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/2/2013 15.85 82.31 47.23 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/3/2013 15.85 82.31 47.25 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/4/2013 15.85 82.31 47.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/5/2013 15.85 82.31 47.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/6/2013 15.85 82.31 47.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/7/2013 15.85 82.31 47.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/8/2013 15.85 82.31 47.32 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/9/2013 15.85 82.31 47.33 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/10/2013 15.85 82.31 47.34 21.40 19.96 0.00
30 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
3/11/2013 15.85 82.31 47.36 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/12/2013 15.85 82.31 47.37 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/13/2013 15.85 82.31 47.38 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/14/2013 15.85 82.31 47.40 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/15/2013 15.85 82.31 47.41 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/16/2013 15.85 82.31 47.43 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/17/2013 15.85 82.31 47.44 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/18/2013 15.85 82.31 47.45 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/19/2013 15.85 82.31 47.47 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/20/2013 15.85 82.31 47.48 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/21/2013 15.85 82.31 47.50 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/22/2013 15.85 82.31 47.51 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/23/2013 15.85 82.31 47.52 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/24/2013 15.85 82.31 47.54 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/25/2013 15.85 82.31 47.55 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/26/2013 15.85 82.31 47.57 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/27/2013 15.85 82.31 47.58 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/28/2013 15.85 82.31 47.59 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/29/2013 15.85 82.31 47.61 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/30/2013 15.85 82.31 47.62 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/31/2013 15.85 82.31 47.64 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/1/2013 2.11 82.31 49.19 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/2/2013 2.11 82.31 49.20 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/3/2013 2.11 82.31 49.21 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/4/2013 2.11 82.31 49.22 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/5/2013 2.11 82.31 49.23 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/6/2013 2.11 82.31 49.25 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/7/2013 2.11 82.31 49.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/8/2013 2.11 82.31 49.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/9/2013 2.11 82.31 49.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/10/2013 2.11 82.31 49.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/11/2013 2.11 82.31 49.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/12/2013 2.11 82.31 49.32 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/13/2013 2.11 82.31 49.33 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/14/2013 2.11 82.31 49.34 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/15/2013 2.11 82.31 49.35 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/16/2013 2.11 82.31 49.36 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/17/2013 2.11 82.31 49.37 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/18/2013 2.11 82.31 49.39 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/19/2013 2.11 82.31 49.40 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/20/2013 2.11 82.31 49.41 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/21/2013 2.11 82.31 49.42 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/22/2013 2.11 82.31 49.42 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/23/2013 2.11 82.31 49.43 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/24/2013 2.11 82.31 49.44 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/25/2013 2.11 82.31 49.45 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/26/2013 2.11 82.31 49.46 21.40 19.96 0.00
31 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
4/27/2013 2.11 82.31 49.46 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/28/2013 2.11 82.31 49.47 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/29/2013 2.11 82.31 49.48 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/30/2013 2.11 82.31 49.49 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/1/2013 3.80 82.31 57.23 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/2/2013 3.80 82.31 57.24 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/3/2013 3.80 82.31 57.25 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/4/2013 3.80 82.31 57.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/5/2013 3.80 82.31 57.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/6/2013 3.80 82.31 57.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/7/2013 3.80 82.31 57.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/8/2013 3.80 82.31 57.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/9/2013 3.80 82.31 57.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/10/2013 3.80 82.31 57.31 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/11/2013 3.80 82.31 57.32 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/12/2013 3.80 82.31 57.33 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/13/2013 3.80 82.31 57.34 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/14/2013 3.80 82.31 57.35 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/15/2013 3.80 82.31 57.36 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/16/2013 3.80 82.31 57.36 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/17/2013 3.80 82.31 57.37 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/18/2013 3.80 82.31 57.38 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/19/2013 3.80 82.31 57.39 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/20/2013 3.80 82.31 57.40 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/21/2013 3.80 82.31 57.41 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/22/2013 3.80 82.31 57.42 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/23/2013 3.80 82.31 57.43 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/24/2013 3.80 82.31 57.43 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/25/2013 3.80 82.31 57.44 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/26/2013 3.80 82.31 57.45 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/27/2013 3.80 82.31 57.46 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/28/2013 3.80 82.31 57.47 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/29/2013 3.80 82.31 57.48 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/30/2013 3.80 82.31 57.49 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/31/2013 3.80 82.31 57.50 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/1/2013 5.28 82.31 79.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/2/2013 5.28 82.31 79.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/3/2013 5.28 82.31 79.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/4/2013 5.28 82.31 79.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/5/2013 5.28 82.31 79.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/6/2013 5.28 82.31 79.31 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/7/2013 5.28 82.31 79.32 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/8/2013 5.28 82.31 79.33 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/9/2013 5.28 82.31 79.34 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/10/2013 5.28 82.31 79.35 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/11/2013 5.28 82.31 79.35 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/12/2013 5.28 82.31 79.36 21.40 19.96 0.00
32 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
6/13/2013 5.28 82.31 79.37 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/14/2013 5.28 82.31 79.38 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/15/2013 5.28 82.31 79.39 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/16/2013 5.28 82.31 79.40 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/17/2013 5.28 82.31 79.41 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/18/2013 5.28 82.31 79.42 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/19/2013 5.28 82.31 79.43 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/20/2013 5.28 82.31 79.44 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/21/2013 5.28 82.31 79.45 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/22/2013 5.28 82.31 79.45 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/23/2013 5.28 82.31 79.46 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/24/2013 5.28 82.31 79.47 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/25/2013 5.28 82.31 79.48 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/26/2013 5.28 82.31 79.49 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/27/2013 5.28 82.31 79.50 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/28/2013 5.28 82.31 79.51 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/29/2013 5.28 82.31 79.52 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/30/2013 5.28 82.31 79.53 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/1/2013 6.98 82.31 121.64 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/2/2013 6.98 82.31 121.65 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/3/2013 6.98 82.31 121.65 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/4/2013 6.98 82.31 121.66 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/5/2013 6.98 82.31 121.66 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/6/2013 6.98 82.31 121.67 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/7/2013 6.98 82.31 121.67 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/8/2013 6.98 82.31 121.68 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/9/2013 6.98 82.31 121.68 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/10/2013 6.98 82.31 121.68 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/11/2013 6.98 82.31 121.69 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/12/2013 6.98 82.31 121.69 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/13/2013 6.98 82.31 121.70 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/14/2013 6.98 82.31 121.70 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/15/2013 6.98 82.31 121.71 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/16/2013 6.98 82.31 121.71 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/17/2013 6.98 82.31 121.72 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/18/2013 6.98 82.31 121.72 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/19/2013 6.98 82.31 121.73 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/20/2013 6.98 82.31 121.73 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/21/2013 6.98 82.31 121.74 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/22/2013 6.98 82.31 121.74 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/23/2013 6.98 82.31 121.74 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/24/2013 6.98 82.31 121.75 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/25/2013 6.98 82.31 121.75 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/26/2013 6.98 82.31 121.76 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/27/2013 6.98 82.31 121.76 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/28/2013 6.98 82.31 121.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/29/2013 6.98 82.31 121.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
33 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
7/30/2013 6.98 82.31 121.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/31/2013 6.98 82.31 121.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/1/2013 23.68 82.31 149.89 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/2/2013 23.68 82.31 149.90 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/3/2013 23.68 82.31 149.90 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/4/2013 23.68 82.31 149.91 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/5/2013 23.68 82.31 149.91 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/6/2013 23.68 82.31 149.92 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/7/2013 23.68 82.31 149.93 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/8/2013 23.68 82.31 149.93 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/9/2013 23.68 82.31 149.94 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/10/2013 23.68 82.31 149.94 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/11/2013 23.68 82.31 149.95 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/12/2013 23.68 82.31 149.96 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/13/2013 23.68 82.31 149.96 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/14/2013 23.68 82.31 149.97 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/15/2013 23.68 82.31 149.97 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/16/2013 23.68 82.31 149.98 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/17/2013 23.68 82.31 149.99 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/18/2013 23.68 82.31 149.99 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/19/2013 23.68 82.31 150.00 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/20/2013 23.68 82.31 150.00 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/21/2013 23.68 82.31 150.01 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/22/2013 23.68 82.31 150.02 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/23/2013 23.68 82.31 150.02 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/24/2013 23.68 82.31 150.03 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/25/2013 23.68 82.31 150.03 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/26/2013 23.68 82.31 150.04 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/27/2013 23.68 82.31 150.05 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/28/2013 23.68 82.31 150.05 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/29/2013 23.68 82.31 150.06 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/30/2013 23.68 82.31 150.06 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/31/2013 23.68 82.31 150.07 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/1/2013 24.52 82.31 150.08 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/2/2013 24.52 82.31 150.08 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/3/2013 24.52 82.31 150.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/4/2013 24.52 82.31 150.10 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/5/2013 24.52 82.31 150.10 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/6/2013 24.52 82.31 150.11 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/7/2013 24.52 82.31 150.12 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/8/2013 24.52 82.31 150.12 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/9/2013 24.52 82.31 150.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/10/2013 24.52 82.31 150.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/11/2013 24.52 82.31 150.14 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/12/2013 24.52 82.31 150.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/13/2013 24.52 82.31 150.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/14/2013 24.52 82.31 150.16 21.40 19.96 0.00
34 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
9/15/2013 24.52 82.31 150.17 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/16/2013 24.52 82.31 150.17 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/17/2013 24.52 82.31 150.18 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/18/2013 24.52 82.31 150.19 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/19/2013 24.52 82.31 150.19 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/20/2013 24.52 82.31 150.20 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/21/2013 24.52 82.31 150.20 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/22/2013 24.52 82.31 150.21 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/23/2013 24.52 82.31 150.22 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/24/2013 24.52 82.31 150.22 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/25/2013 24.52 82.31 150.23 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/26/2013 24.52 82.31 150.24 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/27/2013 24.52 82.31 150.24 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/28/2013 24.52 82.31 150.25 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/29/2013 24.52 82.31 150.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/30/2013 24.52 82.31 150.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/1/2013 20.72 82.31 126.79 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/2/2013 20.72 82.31 126.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/3/2013 20.72 82.31 126.81 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/4/2013 20.72 82.31 126.82 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/5/2013 20.72 82.31 126.83 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/6/2013 20.72 82.31 126.84 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/7/2013 20.72 82.31 126.85 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/8/2013 20.72 82.31 126.86 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/9/2013 20.72 82.31 126.86 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/10/2013 20.72 82.31 126.87 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/11/2013 20.72 82.31 126.88 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/12/2013 20.72 82.31 126.89 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/13/2013 20.72 82.31 126.90 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/14/2013 20.72 82.31 126.91 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/15/2013 20.72 82.31 126.92 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/16/2013 20.72 82.31 126.93 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/17/2013 20.72 82.31 126.94 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/18/2013 20.72 82.31 126.95 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/19/2013 20.72 82.31 126.96 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/20/2013 20.72 82.31 126.97 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/21/2013 20.72 82.31 126.98 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/22/2013 20.72 82.31 126.99 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/23/2013 20.72 82.31 127.00 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/24/2013 20.72 82.31 127.01 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/25/2013 20.72 82.31 127.02 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/26/2013 20.72 82.31 127.03 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/27/2013 20.72 82.31 127.04 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/28/2013 20.72 82.31 127.05 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/29/2013 20.72 82.31 127.05 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/30/2013 20.72 82.31 127.06 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/31/2013 20.72 82.31 127.07 21.40 19.96 0.00
35 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
11/1/2013 12.90 82.31 87.86 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/2/2013 12.90 82.31 87.87 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/3/2013 12.90 82.31 87.88 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/4/2013 12.90 82.31 87.89 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/5/2013 12.90 82.31 87.90 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/6/2013 12.90 82.31 87.91 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/7/2013 12.90 82.31 87.92 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/8/2013 12.90 82.31 87.93 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/9/2013 12.90 82.31 87.94 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/10/2013 12.90 82.31 87.95 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/11/2013 12.90 82.31 87.96 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/12/2013 12.90 82.31 87.97 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/13/2013 12.90 82.31 87.98 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/14/2013 12.90 82.31 87.99 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/15/2013 12.90 82.31 88.00 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/16/2013 12.90 82.31 88.01 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/17/2013 12.90 82.31 88.02 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/18/2013 12.90 82.31 88.04 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/19/2013 12.90 82.31 88.05 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/20/2013 12.90 82.31 88.06 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/21/2013 12.90 82.31 88.07 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/22/2013 12.90 82.31 88.08 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/23/2013 12.90 82.31 88.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/24/2013 12.90 82.31 88.10 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/25/2013 12.90 82.31 88.11 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/26/2013 12.90 82.31 88.12 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/27/2013 12.90 82.31 88.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/28/2013 12.90 82.31 88.14 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/29/2013 12.90 82.31 88.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/30/2013 12.90 82.31 88.16 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/1/2013 7.82 82.31 58.25 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/2/2013 7.82 82.31 58.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/3/2013 7.82 82.31 58.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/4/2013 7.82 82.31 58.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/5/2013 7.82 82.31 58.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/6/2013 7.82 82.31 58.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/7/2013 7.82 82.31 58.31 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/8/2013 7.82 82.31 58.32 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/9/2013 7.82 82.31 58.33 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/10/2013 7.82 82.31 58.34 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/11/2013 7.82 82.31 58.35 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/12/2013 7.82 82.31 58.36 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/13/2013 7.82 82.31 58.37 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/14/2013 7.82 82.31 58.38 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/15/2013 7.82 82.31 58.38 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/16/2013 7.82 82.31 58.39 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/17/2013 7.82 82.31 58.40 21.40 19.96 0.00
36 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
12/18/2013 7.82 82.31 58.41 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/19/2013 7.82 82.31 58.42 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/20/2013 7.82 82.31 58.43 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/21/2013 7.82 82.31 58.44 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/22/2013 7.82 82.31 58.45 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/23/2013 7.82 82.31 58.46 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/24/2013 7.82 82.31 58.47 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/25/2013 7.82 82.31 58.48 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/26/2013 7.82 82.31 58.49 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/27/2013 7.82 82.31 58.50 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/28/2013 7.82 82.31 58.50 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/29/2013 7.82 82.31 58.51 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/30/2013 7.82 82.31 58.52 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/31/2013 7.82 82.31 58.53 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/1/2014 9.94 82.31 49.05 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/2/2014 9.94 82.31 49.06 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/3/2014 9.94 82.31 49.07 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/4/2014 9.94 82.31 49.08 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/5/2014 9.94 82.31 49.08 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/6/2014 9.94 82.31 49.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/7/2014 9.94 82.31 49.10 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/8/2014 9.94 82.31 49.11 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/9/2014 9.94 82.31 49.12 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/10/2014 9.94 82.31 49.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/11/2014 9.94 82.31 49.14 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/12/2014 9.94 82.31 49.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/13/2014 9.94 82.31 49.16 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/14/2014 9.94 82.31 49.16 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/15/2014 9.94 82.31 49.17 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/16/2014 9.94 82.31 49.18 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/17/2014 9.94 82.31 49.19 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/18/2014 9.94 82.31 49.20 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/19/2014 9.94 82.31 49.21 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/20/2014 9.94 82.31 49.22 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/21/2014 9.94 82.31 49.23 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/22/2014 9.94 82.31 49.23 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/23/2014 9.94 82.31 49.24 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/24/2014 9.94 82.31 49.25 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/25/2014 9.94 82.31 49.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/26/2014 9.94 82.31 49.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/27/2014 9.94 82.31 49.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/28/2014 9.94 82.31 49.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/29/2014 9.94 82.31 49.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/30/2014 9.94 82.31 49.31 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/31/2014 9.94 82.31 49.31 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/1/2014 8.88 82.31 46.14 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/2/2014 8.88 82.31 46.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
37 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
2/3/2014 8.88 82.31 46.16 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/4/2014 8.88 82.31 46.17 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/5/2014 8.88 82.31 46.17 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/6/2014 8.88 82.31 46.18 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/7/2014 8.88 82.31 46.19 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/8/2014 8.88 82.31 46.20 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/9/2014 8.88 82.31 46.21 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/10/2014 8.88 82.31 46.22 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/11/2014 8.88 82.31 46.23 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/12/2014 8.88 82.31 46.23 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/13/2014 8.88 82.31 46.24 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/14/2014 8.88 82.31 46.25 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/15/2014 8.88 82.31 46.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/16/2014 8.88 82.31 46.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/17/2014 8.88 82.31 46.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/18/2014 8.88 82.31 46.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/19/2014 8.88 82.31 46.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/20/2014 8.88 82.31 46.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/21/2014 8.88 82.31 46.31 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/22/2014 8.88 82.31 46.32 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/23/2014 8.88 82.31 46.33 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/24/2014 8.88 82.31 46.33 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/25/2014 8.88 82.31 46.34 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/26/2014 8.88 82.31 46.35 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/27/2014 8.88 82.31 46.36 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/28/2014 8.88 82.31 46.37 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/1/2014 15.85 82.31 49.58 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/2/2014 15.85 82.31 49.58 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/3/2014 15.85 82.31 49.59 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/4/2014 15.85 82.31 49.60 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/5/2014 15.85 82.31 49.61 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/6/2014 15.85 82.31 49.62 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/7/2014 15.85 82.31 49.63 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/8/2014 15.85 82.31 49.64 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/9/2014 15.85 82.31 49.65 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/10/2014 15.85 82.31 49.66 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/11/2014 15.85 82.31 49.67 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/12/2014 15.85 82.31 49.68 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/13/2014 15.85 82.31 49.69 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/14/2014 15.85 82.31 49.70 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/15/2014 15.85 82.31 49.71 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/16/2014 15.85 82.31 49.72 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/17/2014 15.85 82.31 49.73 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/18/2014 15.85 82.31 49.74 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/19/2014 15.85 82.31 49.75 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/20/2014 15.85 82.31 49.76 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/21/2014 15.85 82.31 49.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
38 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
3/22/2014 15.85 82.31 49.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/23/2014 15.85 82.31 49.79 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/24/2014 15.85 82.31 49.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/25/2014 15.85 82.31 49.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/26/2014 15.85 82.31 49.81 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/27/2014 15.85 82.31 49.82 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/28/2014 15.85 82.31 49.83 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/29/2014 15.85 82.31 49.84 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/30/2014 15.85 82.31 49.85 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/31/2014 15.85 82.31 49.86 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/1/2014 2.11 82.31 51.48 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/2/2014 2.11 82.31 51.49 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/3/2014 2.11 82.31 51.50 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/4/2014 2.11 82.31 51.50 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/5/2014 2.11 82.31 51.51 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/6/2014 2.11 82.31 51.52 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/7/2014 2.11 82.31 51.53 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/8/2014 2.11 82.31 51.54 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/9/2014 2.11 82.31 51.54 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/10/2014 2.11 82.31 51.55 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/11/2014 2.11 82.31 51.56 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/12/2014 2.11 82.31 51.57 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/13/2014 2.11 82.31 51.58 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/14/2014 2.11 82.31 51.58 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/15/2014 2.11 82.31 51.59 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/16/2014 2.11 82.31 51.60 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/17/2014 2.11 82.31 51.61 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/18/2014 2.11 82.31 51.62 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/19/2014 2.11 82.31 51.62 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/20/2014 2.11 82.31 51.63 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/21/2014 2.11 82.31 51.64 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/22/2014 2.11 82.31 51.65 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/23/2014 2.11 82.31 51.66 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/24/2014 2.11 82.31 51.66 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/25/2014 2.11 82.31 51.67 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/26/2014 2.11 82.31 51.68 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/27/2014 2.11 82.31 51.69 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/28/2014 2.11 82.31 51.70 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/29/2014 2.11 82.31 51.70 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/30/2014 2.11 82.31 51.71 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/1/2014 3.80 82.31 59.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/2/2014 3.80 82.31 59.81 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/3/2014 3.80 82.31 59.82 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/4/2014 3.80 82.31 59.83 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/5/2014 3.80 82.31 59.84 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/6/2014 3.80 82.31 59.84 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/7/2014 3.80 82.31 59.85 21.40 19.96 0.00
39 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
5/8/2014 3.80 82.31 59.86 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/9/2014 3.80 82.31 59.87 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/10/2014 3.80 82.31 59.88 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/11/2014 3.80 82.31 59.89 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/12/2014 3.80 82.31 59.90 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/13/2014 3.80 82.31 59.90 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/14/2014 3.80 82.31 59.91 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/15/2014 3.80 82.31 59.92 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/16/2014 3.80 82.31 59.93 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/17/2014 3.80 82.31 59.94 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/18/2014 3.80 82.31 59.95 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/19/2014 3.80 82.31 59.96 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/20/2014 3.80 82.31 59.96 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/21/2014 3.80 82.31 59.97 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/22/2014 3.80 82.31 59.98 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/23/2014 3.80 82.31 59.99 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/24/2014 3.80 82.31 60.00 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/25/2014 3.80 82.31 60.01 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/26/2014 3.80 82.31 60.02 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/27/2014 3.80 82.31 60.02 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/28/2014 3.80 82.31 60.03 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/29/2014 3.80 82.31 60.04 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/30/2014 3.80 82.31 60.05 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/31/2014 3.80 82.31 60.06 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/1/2014 5.28 82.31 82.79 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/2/2014 5.28 82.31 82.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/3/2014 5.28 82.31 82.81 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/4/2014 5.28 82.31 82.82 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/5/2014 5.28 82.31 82.83 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/6/2014 5.28 82.31 82.84 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/7/2014 5.28 82.31 82.85 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/8/2014 5.28 82.31 82.85 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/9/2014 5.28 82.31 82.86 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/10/2014 5.28 82.31 82.87 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/11/2014 5.28 82.31 82.88 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/12/2014 5.28 82.31 82.89 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/13/2014 5.28 82.31 82.90 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/14/2014 5.28 82.31 82.91 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/15/2014 5.28 82.31 82.91 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/16/2014 5.28 82.31 82.92 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/17/2014 5.28 82.31 82.93 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/18/2014 5.28 82.31 82.94 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/19/2014 5.28 82.31 82.95 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/20/2014 5.28 82.31 82.96 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/21/2014 5.28 82.31 82.97 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/22/2014 5.28 82.31 82.97 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/23/2014 5.28 82.31 82.98 21.40 19.96 0.00
40 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
6/24/2014 5.28 82.31 82.99 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/25/2014 5.28 82.31 83.00 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/26/2014 5.28 82.31 83.01 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/27/2014 5.28 82.31 83.02 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/28/2014 5.28 82.31 83.03 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/29/2014 5.28 82.31 83.03 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/30/2014 5.28 82.31 83.04 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/1/2014 6.98 82.31 127.02 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/2/2014 6.98 82.31 127.02 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/3/2014 6.98 82.31 127.03 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/4/2014 6.98 82.31 127.03 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/5/2014 6.98 82.31 127.03 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/6/2014 6.98 82.31 127.04 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/7/2014 6.98 82.31 127.04 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/8/2014 6.98 82.31 127.04 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/9/2014 6.98 82.31 127.05 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/10/2014 6.98 82.31 127.05 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/11/2014 6.98 82.31 127.05 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/12/2014 6.98 82.31 127.06 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/13/2014 6.98 82.31 127.06 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/14/2014 6.98 82.31 127.06 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/15/2014 6.98 82.31 127.07 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/16/2014 6.98 82.31 127.07 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/17/2014 6.98 82.31 127.07 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/18/2014 6.98 82.31 127.08 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/19/2014 6.98 82.31 127.08 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/20/2014 6.98 82.31 127.08 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/21/2014 6.98 82.31 127.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/22/2014 6.98 82.31 127.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/23/2014 6.98 82.31 127.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/24/2014 6.98 82.31 127.10 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/25/2014 6.98 82.31 127.10 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/26/2014 6.98 82.31 127.10 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/27/2014 6.98 82.31 127.11 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/28/2014 6.98 82.31 127.11 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/29/2014 6.98 82.31 127.11 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/30/2014 6.98 82.31 127.12 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/31/2014 6.98 82.31 127.12 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/1/2014 23.68 82.31 156.46 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/2/2014 23.68 82.31 156.46 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/3/2014 23.68 82.31 156.47 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/4/2014 23.68 82.31 156.47 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/5/2014 23.68 82.31 156.48 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/6/2014 23.68 82.31 156.48 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/7/2014 23.68 82.31 156.48 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/8/2014 23.68 82.31 156.49 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/9/2014 23.68 82.31 156.49 21.40 19.96 0.00
41 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
8/10/2014 23.68 82.31 156.50 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/11/2014 23.68 82.31 156.50 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/12/2014 23.68 82.31 156.50 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/13/2014 23.68 82.31 156.51 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/14/2014 23.68 82.31 156.51 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/15/2014 23.68 82.31 156.52 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/16/2014 23.68 82.31 156.52 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/17/2014 23.68 82.31 156.53 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/18/2014 23.68 82.31 156.53 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/19/2014 23.68 82.31 156.53 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/20/2014 23.68 82.31 156.54 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/21/2014 23.68 82.31 156.54 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/22/2014 23.68 82.31 156.55 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/23/2014 23.68 82.31 156.55 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/24/2014 23.68 82.31 156.56 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/25/2014 23.68 82.31 156.56 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/26/2014 23.68 82.31 156.56 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/27/2014 23.68 82.31 156.57 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/28/2014 23.68 82.31 156.57 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/29/2014 23.68 82.31 156.58 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/30/2014 23.68 82.31 156.58 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/31/2014 23.68 82.31 156.58 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/1/2014 24.52 82.31 156.59 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/2/2014 24.52 82.31 156.59 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/3/2014 24.52 82.31 156.60 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/4/2014 24.52 82.31 156.60 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/5/2014 24.52 82.31 156.61 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/6/2014 24.52 82.31 156.61 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/7/2014 24.52 82.31 156.62 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/8/2014 24.52 82.31 156.62 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/9/2014 24.52 82.31 156.62 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/10/2014 24.52 82.31 156.63 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/11/2014 24.52 82.31 156.63 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/12/2014 24.52 82.31 156.64 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/13/2014 24.52 82.31 156.64 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/14/2014 24.52 82.31 156.65 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/15/2014 24.52 82.31 156.65 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/16/2014 24.52 82.31 156.66 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/17/2014 24.52 82.31 156.66 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/18/2014 24.52 82.31 156.67 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/19/2014 24.52 82.31 156.67 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/20/2014 24.52 82.31 156.67 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/21/2014 24.52 82.31 156.68 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/22/2014 24.52 82.31 156.68 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/23/2014 24.52 82.31 156.69 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/24/2014 24.52 82.31 156.69 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/25/2014 24.52 82.31 156.70 21.40 19.96 0.00
42 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
9/26/2014 24.52 82.31 156.70 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/27/2014 24.52 82.31 156.71 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/28/2014 24.52 82.31 156.71 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/29/2014 24.52 82.31 156.71 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/30/2014 24.52 82.31 156.72 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/1/2014 20.72 82.31 132.24 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/2/2014 20.72 82.31 132.24 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/3/2014 20.72 82.31 132.25 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/4/2014 20.72 82.31 132.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/5/2014 20.72 82.31 132.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/6/2014 20.72 82.31 132.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/7/2014 20.72 82.31 132.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/8/2014 20.72 82.31 132.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/9/2014 20.72 82.31 132.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/10/2014 20.72 82.31 132.31 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/11/2014 20.72 82.31 132.32 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/12/2014 20.72 82.31 132.33 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/13/2014 20.72 82.31 132.33 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/14/2014 20.72 82.31 132.34 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/15/2014 20.72 82.31 132.35 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/16/2014 20.72 82.31 132.36 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/17/2014 20.72 82.31 132.37 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/18/2014 20.72 82.31 132.38 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/19/2014 20.72 82.31 132.38 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/20/2014 20.72 82.31 132.39 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/21/2014 20.72 82.31 132.40 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/22/2014 20.72 82.31 132.41 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/23/2014 20.72 82.31 132.42 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/24/2014 20.72 82.31 132.42 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/25/2014 20.72 82.31 132.43 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/26/2014 20.72 82.31 132.44 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/27/2014 20.72 82.31 132.45 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/28/2014 20.72 82.31 132.46 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/29/2014 20.72 82.31 132.47 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/30/2014 20.72 82.31 132.47 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/31/2014 20.72 82.31 132.48 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/1/2014 12.90 82.31 91.60 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/2/2014 12.90 82.31 91.61 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/3/2014 12.90 82.31 91.62 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/4/2014 12.90 82.31 91.63 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/5/2014 12.90 82.31 91.64 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/6/2014 12.90 82.31 91.65 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/7/2014 12.90 82.31 91.66 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/8/2014 12.90 82.31 91.67 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/9/2014 12.90 82.31 91.68 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/10/2014 12.90 82.31 91.69 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/11/2014 12.90 82.31 91.70 21.40 19.96 0.00
43 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
11/12/2014 12.90 82.31 91.70 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/13/2014 12.90 82.31 91.71 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/14/2014 12.90 82.31 91.72 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/15/2014 12.90 82.31 91.73 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/16/2014 12.90 82.31 91.74 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/17/2014 12.90 82.31 91.75 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/18/2014 12.90 82.31 91.76 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/19/2014 12.90 82.31 91.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/20/2014 12.90 82.31 91.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/21/2014 12.90 82.31 91.79 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/22/2014 12.90 82.31 91.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/23/2014 12.90 82.31 91.81 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/24/2014 12.90 82.31 91.82 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/25/2014 12.90 82.31 91.83 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/26/2014 12.90 82.31 91.84 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/27/2014 12.90 82.31 91.85 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/28/2014 12.90 82.31 91.86 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/29/2014 12.90 82.31 91.87 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/30/2014 12.90 82.31 91.88 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/1/2014 7.82 82.31 60.71 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/2/2014 7.82 82.31 60.72 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/3/2014 7.82 82.31 60.73 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/4/2014 7.82 82.31 60.74 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/5/2014 7.82 82.31 60.75 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/6/2014 7.82 82.31 60.76 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/7/2014 7.82 82.31 60.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/8/2014 7.82 82.31 60.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/9/2014 7.82 82.31 60.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/10/2014 7.82 82.31 60.79 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/11/2014 7.82 82.31 60.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/12/2014 7.82 82.31 60.81 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/13/2014 7.82 82.31 60.82 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/14/2014 7.82 82.31 60.83 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/15/2014 7.82 82.31 60.84 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/16/2014 7.82 82.31 60.85 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/17/2014 7.82 82.31 60.86 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/18/2014 7.82 82.31 60.87 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/19/2014 7.82 82.31 60.87 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/20/2014 7.82 82.31 60.88 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/21/2014 7.82 82.31 60.89 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/22/2014 7.82 82.31 60.90 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/23/2014 7.82 82.31 60.91 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/24/2014 7.82 82.31 60.92 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/25/2014 7.82 82.31 60.93 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/26/2014 7.82 82.31 60.94 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/27/2014 7.82 82.31 60.95 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/28/2014 7.82 82.31 60.96 21.40 19.96 0.00
44 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
12/29/2014 7.82 82.31 60.96 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/30/2014 7.82 82.31 60.97 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/31/2014 7.82 82.31 60.98 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/1/2015 9.94 82.31 51.10 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/2/2015 9.94 82.31 51.11 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/3/2015 9.94 82.31 51.12 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/4/2015 9.94 82.31 51.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/5/2015 9.94 82.31 51.14 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/6/2015 9.94 82.31 51.14 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/7/2015 9.94 82.31 51.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/8/2015 9.94 82.31 51.16 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/9/2015 9.94 82.31 51.17 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/10/2015 9.94 82.31 51.18 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/11/2015 9.94 82.31 51.19 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/12/2015 9.94 82.31 51.20 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/13/2015 9.94 82.31 51.20 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/14/2015 9.94 82.31 51.21 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/15/2015 9.94 82.31 51.22 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/16/2015 9.94 82.31 51.23 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/17/2015 9.94 82.31 51.24 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/18/2015 9.94 82.31 51.25 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/19/2015 9.94 82.31 51.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/20/2015 9.94 82.31 51.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/21/2015 9.94 82.31 51.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/22/2015 9.94 82.31 51.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/23/2015 9.94 82.31 51.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/24/2015 9.94 82.31 51.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/25/2015 9.94 82.31 51.31 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/26/2015 9.94 82.31 51.32 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/27/2015 9.94 82.31 51.33 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/28/2015 9.94 82.31 51.33 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/29/2015 9.94 82.31 51.34 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/30/2015 9.94 82.31 51.35 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/31/2015 9.94 82.31 51.36 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/1/2015 8.88 82.31 48.06 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/2/2015 8.88 82.31 48.06 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/3/2015 8.88 82.31 48.07 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/4/2015 8.88 82.31 48.08 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/5/2015 8.88 82.31 48.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/6/2015 8.88 82.31 48.10 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/7/2015 8.88 82.31 48.10 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/8/2015 8.88 82.31 48.11 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/9/2015 8.88 82.31 48.12 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/10/2015 8.88 82.31 48.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/11/2015 8.88 82.31 48.14 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/12/2015 8.88 82.31 48.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/13/2015 8.88 82.31 48.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
45 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
2/14/2015 8.88 82.31 48.16 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/15/2015 8.88 82.31 48.17 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/16/2015 8.88 82.31 48.18 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/17/2015 8.88 82.31 48.19 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/18/2015 8.88 82.31 48.20 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/19/2015 8.88 82.31 48.20 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/20/2015 8.88 82.31 48.21 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/21/2015 8.88 82.31 48.22 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/22/2015 8.88 82.31 48.23 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/23/2015 8.88 82.31 48.24 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/24/2015 8.88 82.31 48.25 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/25/2015 8.88 82.31 48.25 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/26/2015 8.88 82.31 48.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/27/2015 8.88 82.31 48.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/28/2015 8.88 82.31 48.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/1/2015 15.85 82.31 51.62 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/2/2015 15.85 82.31 51.63 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/3/2015 15.85 82.31 51.64 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/4/2015 15.85 82.31 51.64 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/5/2015 15.85 82.31 51.65 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/6/2015 15.85 82.31 51.66 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/7/2015 15.85 82.31 51.67 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/8/2015 15.85 82.31 51.68 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/9/2015 15.85 82.31 51.69 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/10/2015 15.85 82.31 51.70 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/11/2015 15.85 82.31 51.71 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/12/2015 15.85 82.31 51.72 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/13/2015 15.85 82.31 51.73 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/14/2015 15.85 82.31 51.74 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/15/2015 15.85 82.31 51.75 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/16/2015 15.85 82.31 51.76 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/17/2015 15.85 82.31 51.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/18/2015 15.85 82.31 51.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/19/2015 15.85 82.31 51.79 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/20/2015 15.85 82.31 51.79 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/21/2015 15.85 82.31 51.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/22/2015 15.85 82.31 51.81 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/23/2015 15.85 82.31 51.82 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/24/2015 15.85 82.31 51.83 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/25/2015 15.85 82.31 51.84 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/26/2015 15.85 82.31 51.85 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/27/2015 15.85 82.31 51.86 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/28/2015 15.85 82.31 51.87 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/29/2015 15.85 82.31 51.88 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/30/2015 15.85 82.31 51.89 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/31/2015 15.85 82.31 51.90 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/1/2015 2.11 82.31 53.58 21.40 19.96 0.00
46 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
4/2/2015 2.11 82.31 53.59 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/3/2015 2.11 82.31 53.60 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/4/2015 2.11 82.31 53.60 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/5/2015 2.11 82.31 53.61 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/6/2015 2.11 82.31 53.62 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/7/2015 2.11 82.31 53.63 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/8/2015 2.11 82.31 53.64 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/9/2015 2.11 82.31 53.64 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/10/2015 2.11 82.31 53.65 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/11/2015 2.11 82.31 53.66 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/12/2015 2.11 82.31 53.67 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/13/2015 2.11 82.31 53.68 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/14/2015 2.11 82.31 53.68 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/15/2015 2.11 82.31 53.69 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/16/2015 2.11 82.31 53.70 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/17/2015 2.11 82.31 53.71 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/18/2015 2.11 82.31 53.71 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/19/2015 2.11 82.31 53.72 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/20/2015 2.11 82.31 53.73 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/21/2015 2.11 82.31 53.74 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/22/2015 2.11 82.31 53.75 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/23/2015 2.11 82.31 53.75 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/24/2015 2.11 82.31 53.76 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/25/2015 2.11 82.31 53.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/26/2015 2.11 82.31 53.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/27/2015 2.11 82.31 53.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/28/2015 2.11 82.31 53.79 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/29/2015 2.11 82.31 53.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/30/2015 2.11 82.31 53.81 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/1/2015 3.80 82.31 62.22 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/2/2015 3.80 82.31 62.23 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/3/2015 3.80 82.31 62.24 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/4/2015 3.80 82.31 62.25 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/5/2015 3.80 82.31 62.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/6/2015 3.80 82.31 62.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/7/2015 3.80 82.31 62.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/8/2015 3.80 82.31 62.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/9/2015 3.80 82.31 62.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/10/2015 3.80 82.31 62.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/11/2015 3.80 82.31 62.31 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/12/2015 3.80 82.31 62.32 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/13/2015 3.80 82.31 62.32 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/14/2015 3.80 82.31 62.33 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/15/2015 3.80 82.31 62.34 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/16/2015 3.80 82.31 62.35 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/17/2015 3.80 82.31 62.36 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/18/2015 3.80 82.31 62.37 21.40 19.96 0.00
47 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
5/19/2015 3.80 82.31 62.37 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/20/2015 3.80 82.31 62.38 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/21/2015 3.80 82.31 62.39 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/22/2015 3.80 82.31 62.40 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/23/2015 3.80 82.31 62.41 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/24/2015 3.80 82.31 62.41 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/25/2015 3.80 82.31 62.42 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/26/2015 3.80 82.31 62.43 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/27/2015 3.80 82.31 62.44 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/28/2015 3.80 82.31 62.45 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/29/2015 3.80 82.31 62.46 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/30/2015 3.80 82.31 62.46 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/31/2015 3.80 82.31 62.47 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/1/2015 5.28 82.31 86.12 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/2/2015 5.28 82.31 86.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/3/2015 5.28 82.31 86.14 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/4/2015 5.28 82.31 86.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/5/2015 5.28 82.31 86.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/6/2015 5.28 82.31 86.16 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/7/2015 5.28 82.31 86.17 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/8/2015 5.28 82.31 86.18 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/9/2015 5.28 82.31 86.19 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/10/2015 5.28 82.31 86.20 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/11/2015 5.28 82.31 86.20 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/12/2015 5.28 82.31 86.21 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/13/2015 5.28 82.31 86.22 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/14/2015 5.28 82.31 86.23 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/15/2015 5.28 82.31 86.24 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/16/2015 5.28 82.31 86.24 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/17/2015 5.28 82.31 86.25 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/18/2015 5.28 82.31 86.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/19/2015 5.28 82.31 86.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/20/2015 5.28 82.31 86.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/21/2015 5.28 82.31 86.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/22/2015 5.28 82.31 86.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/23/2015 5.28 82.31 86.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/24/2015 5.28 82.31 86.31 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/25/2015 5.28 82.31 86.32 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/26/2015 5.28 82.31 86.32 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/27/2015 5.28 82.31 86.33 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/28/2015 5.28 82.31 86.34 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/29/2015 5.28 82.31 86.35 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/30/2015 5.28 82.31 86.36 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/1/2015 6.98 82.31 132.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/2/2015 6.98 82.31 132.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/3/2015 6.98 82.31 132.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/4/2015 6.98 82.31 132.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
48 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
7/5/2015 6.98 82.31 132.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/6/2015 6.98 82.31 132.10 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/7/2015 6.98 82.31 132.10 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/8/2015 6.98 82.31 132.10 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/9/2015 6.98 82.31 132.10 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/10/2015 6.98 82.31 132.11 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/11/2015 6.98 82.31 132.11 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/12/2015 6.98 82.31 132.11 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/13/2015 6.98 82.31 132.11 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/14/2015 6.98 82.31 132.11 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/15/2015 6.98 82.31 132.12 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/16/2015 6.98 82.31 132.12 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/17/2015 6.98 82.31 132.12 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/18/2015 6.98 82.31 132.12 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/19/2015 6.98 82.31 132.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/20/2015 6.98 82.31 132.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/21/2015 6.98 82.31 132.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/22/2015 6.98 82.31 132.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/23/2015 6.98 82.31 132.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/24/2015 6.98 82.31 132.14 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/25/2015 6.98 82.31 132.14 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/26/2015 6.98 82.31 132.14 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/27/2015 6.98 82.31 132.14 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/28/2015 6.98 82.31 132.14 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/29/2015 6.98 82.31 132.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/30/2015 6.98 82.31 132.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/31/2015 6.98 82.31 132.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/1/2015 23.68 82.31 162.65 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/2/2015 23.68 82.31 162.65 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/3/2015 23.68 82.31 162.65 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/4/2015 23.68 82.31 162.66 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/5/2015 23.68 82.31 162.66 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/6/2015 23.68 82.31 162.66 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/7/2015 23.68 82.31 162.66 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/8/2015 23.68 82.31 162.67 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/9/2015 23.68 82.31 162.67 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/10/2015 23.68 82.31 162.67 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/11/2015 23.68 82.31 162.67 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/12/2015 23.68 82.31 162.68 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/13/2015 23.68 82.31 162.68 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/14/2015 23.68 82.31 162.68 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/15/2015 23.68 82.31 162.68 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/16/2015 23.68 82.31 162.69 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/17/2015 23.68 82.31 162.69 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/18/2015 23.68 82.31 162.69 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/19/2015 23.68 82.31 162.69 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/20/2015 23.68 82.31 162.70 21.40 19.96 0.00
49 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
8/21/2015 23.68 82.31 162.70 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/22/2015 23.68 82.31 162.70 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/23/2015 23.68 82.31 162.70 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/24/2015 23.68 82.31 162.71 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/25/2015 23.68 82.31 162.71 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/26/2015 23.68 82.31 162.71 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/27/2015 23.68 82.31 162.71 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/28/2015 23.68 82.31 162.72 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/29/2015 23.68 82.31 162.72 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/30/2015 23.68 82.31 162.72 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/31/2015 23.68 82.31 162.72 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/1/2015 24.52 82.31 162.73 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/2/2015 24.52 82.31 162.73 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/3/2015 24.52 82.31 162.73 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/4/2015 24.52 82.31 162.73 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/5/2015 24.52 82.31 162.74 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/6/2015 24.52 82.31 162.74 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/7/2015 24.52 82.31 162.74 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/8/2015 24.52 82.31 162.74 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/9/2015 24.52 82.31 162.75 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/10/2015 24.52 82.31 162.75 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/11/2015 24.52 82.31 162.75 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/12/2015 24.52 82.31 162.76 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/13/2015 24.52 82.31 162.76 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/14/2015 24.52 82.31 162.76 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/15/2015 24.52 82.31 162.76 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/16/2015 24.52 82.31 162.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/17/2015 24.52 82.31 162.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/18/2015 24.52 82.31 162.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/19/2015 24.52 82.31 162.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/20/2015 24.52 82.31 162.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/21/2015 24.52 82.31 162.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/22/2015 24.52 82.31 162.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/23/2015 24.52 82.31 162.79 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/24/2015 24.52 82.31 162.79 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/25/2015 24.52 82.31 162.79 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/26/2015 24.52 82.31 162.79 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/27/2015 24.52 82.31 162.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/28/2015 24.52 82.31 162.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/29/2015 24.52 82.31 162.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/30/2015 24.52 82.31 162.81 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/1/2015 20.72 82.31 137.37 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/2/2015 20.72 82.31 137.38 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/3/2015 20.72 82.31 137.38 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/4/2015 20.72 82.31 137.39 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/5/2015 20.72 82.31 137.40 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/6/2015 20.72 82.31 137.40 21.40 19.96 0.00
50 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
10/7/2015 20.72 82.31 137.41 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/8/2015 20.72 82.31 137.42 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/9/2015 20.72 82.31 137.43 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/10/2015 20.72 82.31 137.43 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/11/2015 20.72 82.31 137.44 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/12/2015 20.72 82.31 137.45 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/13/2015 20.72 82.31 137.45 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/14/2015 20.72 82.31 137.46 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/15/2015 20.72 82.31 137.47 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/16/2015 20.72 82.31 137.47 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/17/2015 20.72 82.31 137.48 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/18/2015 20.72 82.31 137.49 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/19/2015 20.72 82.31 137.50 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/20/2015 20.72 82.31 137.50 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/21/2015 20.72 82.31 137.51 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/22/2015 20.72 82.31 137.52 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/23/2015 20.72 82.31 137.52 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/24/2015 20.72 82.31 137.53 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/25/2015 20.72 82.31 137.54 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/26/2015 20.72 82.31 137.54 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/27/2015 20.72 82.31 137.55 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/28/2015 20.72 82.31 137.56 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/29/2015 20.72 82.31 137.56 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/30/2015 20.72 82.31 137.57 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/31/2015 20.72 82.31 137.58 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/1/2015 12.90 82.31 95.12 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/2/2015 12.90 82.31 95.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/3/2015 12.90 82.31 95.14 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/4/2015 12.90 82.31 95.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/5/2015 12.90 82.31 95.16 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/6/2015 12.90 82.31 95.17 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/7/2015 12.90 82.31 95.18 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/8/2015 12.90 82.31 95.19 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/9/2015 12.90 82.31 95.19 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/10/2015 12.90 82.31 95.20 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/11/2015 12.90 82.31 95.21 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/12/2015 12.90 82.31 95.22 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/13/2015 12.90 82.31 95.23 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/14/2015 12.90 82.31 95.24 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/15/2015 12.90 82.31 95.25 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/16/2015 12.90 82.31 95.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/17/2015 12.90 82.31 95.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/18/2015 12.90 82.31 95.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/19/2015 12.90 82.31 95.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/20/2015 12.90 82.31 95.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/21/2015 12.90 82.31 95.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/22/2015 12.90 82.31 95.31 21.40 19.96 0.00
51 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
11/23/2015 12.90 82.31 95.32 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/24/2015 12.90 82.31 95.33 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/25/2015 12.90 82.31 95.34 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/26/2015 12.90 82.31 95.35 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/27/2015 12.90 82.31 95.36 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/28/2015 12.90 82.31 95.37 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/29/2015 12.90 82.31 95.38 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/30/2015 12.90 82.31 95.38 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/1/2015 7.82 82.31 63.03 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/2/2015 7.82 82.31 63.04 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/3/2015 7.82 82.31 63.05 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/4/2015 7.82 82.31 63.05 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/5/2015 7.82 82.31 63.06 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/6/2015 7.82 82.31 63.07 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/7/2015 7.82 82.31 63.08 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/8/2015 7.82 82.31 63.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/9/2015 7.82 82.31 63.10 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/10/2015 7.82 82.31 63.11 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/11/2015 7.82 82.31 63.12 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/12/2015 7.82 82.31 63.12 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/13/2015 7.82 82.31 63.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/14/2015 7.82 82.31 63.14 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/15/2015 7.82 82.31 63.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/16/2015 7.82 82.31 63.16 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/17/2015 7.82 82.31 63.17 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/18/2015 7.82 82.31 63.18 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/19/2015 7.82 82.31 63.19 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/20/2015 7.82 82.31 63.19 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/21/2015 7.82 82.31 63.20 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/22/2015 7.82 82.31 63.21 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/23/2015 7.82 82.31 63.22 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/24/2015 7.82 82.31 63.23 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/25/2015 7.82 82.31 63.24 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/26/2015 7.82 82.31 63.25 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/27/2015 7.82 82.31 63.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/28/2015 7.82 82.31 63.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/29/2015 7.82 82.31 63.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/30/2015 7.82 82.31 63.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
12/31/2015 7.82 82.31 63.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/1/2016 9.94 82.31 53.03 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/2/2016 9.94 82.31 53.04 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/3/2016 9.94 82.31 53.05 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/4/2016 9.94 82.31 53.06 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/5/2016 9.94 82.31 53.07 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/6/2016 9.94 82.31 53.08 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/7/2016 9.94 82.31 53.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/8/2016 9.94 82.31 53.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
52 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
1/9/2016 9.94 82.31 53.10 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/10/2016 9.94 82.31 53.11 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/11/2016 9.94 82.31 53.12 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/12/2016 9.94 82.31 53.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/13/2016 9.94 82.31 53.14 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/14/2016 9.94 82.31 53.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/15/2016 9.94 82.31 53.15 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/16/2016 9.94 82.31 53.16 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/17/2016 9.94 82.31 53.17 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/18/2016 9.94 82.31 53.18 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/19/2016 9.94 82.31 53.19 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/20/2016 9.94 82.31 53.20 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/21/2016 9.94 82.31 53.20 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/22/2016 9.94 82.31 53.21 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/23/2016 9.94 82.31 53.22 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/24/2016 9.94 82.31 53.23 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/25/2016 9.94 82.31 53.24 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/26/2016 9.94 82.31 53.25 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/27/2016 9.94 82.31 53.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/28/2016 9.94 82.31 53.26 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/29/2016 9.94 82.31 53.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/30/2016 9.94 82.31 53.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
1/31/2016 9.94 82.31 53.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/1/2016 8.88 82.31 49.86 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/2/2016 8.88 82.31 49.87 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/3/2016 8.88 82.31 49.88 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/4/2016 8.88 82.31 49.88 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/5/2016 8.88 82.31 49.89 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/6/2016 8.88 82.31 49.90 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/7/2016 8.88 82.31 49.91 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/8/2016 8.88 82.31 49.91 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/9/2016 8.88 82.31 49.92 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/10/2016 8.88 82.31 49.92 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/11/2016 8.88 82.31 49.93 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/12/2016 8.88 82.31 49.94 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/13/2016 8.88 82.31 49.94 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/14/2016 8.88 82.31 49.95 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/15/2016 8.88 82.31 49.96 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/16/2016 8.88 82.31 49.96 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/17/2016 8.88 82.31 49.97 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/18/2016 8.88 82.31 49.97 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/19/2016 8.88 82.31 49.98 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/20/2016 8.88 82.31 49.99 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/21/2016 8.88 82.31 49.99 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/22/2016 8.88 82.31 50.00 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/23/2016 8.88 82.31 50.01 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/24/2016 8.88 82.31 50.01 21.40 19.96 0.00
53 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
2/25/2016 8.88 82.31 50.02 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/26/2016 8.88 82.31 50.02 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/27/2016 8.88 82.31 50.03 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/28/2016 8.88 82.31 50.04 21.40 19.96 0.00
2/29/2016 8.88 82.31 50.04 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/1/2016 15.85 82.31 53.50 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/2/2016 15.85 82.31 53.51 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/3/2016 15.85 82.31 53.52 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/4/2016 15.85 82.31 53.52 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/5/2016 15.85 82.31 53.53 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/6/2016 15.85 82.31 53.54 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/7/2016 15.85 82.31 53.54 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/8/2016 15.85 82.31 53.55 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/9/2016 15.85 82.31 53.56 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/10/2016 15.85 82.31 53.57 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/11/2016 15.85 82.31 53.57 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/12/2016 15.85 82.31 53.58 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/13/2016 15.85 82.31 53.59 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/14/2016 15.85 82.31 53.59 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/15/2016 15.85 82.31 53.60 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/16/2016 15.85 82.31 53.61 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/17/2016 15.85 82.31 53.61 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/18/2016 15.85 82.31 53.62 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/19/2016 15.85 82.31 53.63 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/20/2016 15.85 82.31 53.64 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/21/2016 15.85 82.31 53.64 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/22/2016 15.85 82.31 53.65 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/23/2016 15.85 82.31 53.66 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/24/2016 15.85 82.31 53.66 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/25/2016 15.85 82.31 53.67 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/26/2016 15.85 82.31 53.68 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/27/2016 15.85 82.31 53.69 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/28/2016 15.85 82.31 53.69 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/29/2016 15.85 82.31 53.70 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/30/2016 15.85 82.31 53.71 21.40 19.96 0.00
3/31/2016 15.85 82.31 53.71 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/1/2016 2.11 82.31 55.45 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/2/2016 2.11 82.31 55.46 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/3/2016 2.11 82.31 55.47 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/4/2016 2.11 82.31 55.47 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/5/2016 2.11 82.31 55.48 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/6/2016 2.11 82.31 55.48 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/7/2016 2.11 82.31 55.49 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/8/2016 2.11 82.31 55.50 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/9/2016 2.11 82.31 55.50 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/10/2016 2.11 82.31 55.51 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/11/2016 2.11 82.31 55.51 21.40 19.96 0.00
54 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
4/12/2016 2.11 82.31 55.52 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/13/2016 2.11 82.31 55.53 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/14/2016 2.11 82.31 55.53 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/15/2016 2.11 82.31 55.54 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/16/2016 2.11 82.31 55.54 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/17/2016 2.11 82.31 55.55 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/18/2016 2.11 82.31 55.55 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/19/2016 2.11 82.31 55.56 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/20/2016 2.11 82.31 55.57 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/21/2016 2.11 82.31 55.57 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/22/2016 2.11 82.31 55.58 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/23/2016 2.11 82.31 55.58 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/24/2016 2.11 82.31 55.59 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/25/2016 2.11 82.31 55.60 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/26/2016 2.11 82.31 55.60 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/27/2016 2.11 82.31 55.61 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/28/2016 2.11 82.31 55.61 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/29/2016 2.11 82.31 55.62 21.40 19.96 0.00
4/30/2016 2.11 82.31 55.63 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/1/2016 3.80 82.31 64.32 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/2/2016 3.80 82.31 64.33 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/3/2016 3.80 82.31 64.34 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/4/2016 3.80 82.31 64.34 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/5/2016 3.80 82.31 64.35 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/6/2016 3.80 82.31 64.35 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/7/2016 3.80 82.31 64.36 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/8/2016 3.80 82.31 64.37 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/9/2016 3.80 82.31 64.37 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/10/2016 3.80 82.31 64.38 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/11/2016 3.80 82.31 64.39 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/12/2016 3.80 82.31 64.39 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/13/2016 3.80 82.31 64.40 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/14/2016 3.80 82.31 64.40 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/15/2016 3.80 82.31 64.41 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/16/2016 3.80 82.31 64.42 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/17/2016 3.80 82.31 64.42 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/18/2016 3.80 82.31 64.43 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/19/2016 3.80 82.31 64.44 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/20/2016 3.80 82.31 64.44 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/21/2016 3.80 82.31 64.45 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/22/2016 3.80 82.31 64.45 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/23/2016 3.80 82.31 64.46 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/24/2016 3.80 82.31 64.47 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/25/2016 3.80 82.31 64.47 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/26/2016 3.80 82.31 64.48 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/27/2016 3.80 82.31 64.49 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/28/2016 3.80 82.31 64.49 21.40 19.96 0.00
55 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
5/29/2016 3.80 82.31 64.50 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/30/2016 3.80 82.31 64.50 21.40 19.96 0.00
5/31/2016 3.80 82.31 64.51 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/1/2016 5.28 82.31 88.93 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/2/2016 5.28 82.31 88.93 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/3/2016 5.28 82.31 88.94 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/4/2016 5.28 82.31 88.95 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/5/2016 5.28 82.31 88.95 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/6/2016 5.28 82.31 88.96 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/7/2016 5.28 82.31 88.96 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/8/2016 5.28 82.31 88.97 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/9/2016 5.28 82.31 88.98 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/10/2016 5.28 82.31 88.98 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/11/2016 5.28 82.31 88.99 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/12/2016 5.28 82.31 88.99 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/13/2016 5.28 82.31 89.00 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/14/2016 5.28 82.31 89.01 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/15/2016 5.28 82.31 89.01 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/16/2016 5.28 82.31 89.02 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/17/2016 5.28 82.31 89.02 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/18/2016 5.28 82.31 89.03 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/19/2016 5.28 82.31 89.04 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/20/2016 5.28 82.31 89.04 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/21/2016 5.28 82.31 89.05 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/22/2016 5.28 82.31 89.05 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/23/2016 5.28 82.31 89.06 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/24/2016 5.28 82.31 89.06 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/25/2016 5.28 82.31 89.07 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/26/2016 5.28 82.31 89.08 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/27/2016 5.28 82.31 89.08 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/28/2016 5.28 82.31 89.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/29/2016 5.28 82.31 89.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
6/30/2016 5.28 82.31 89.10 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/1/2016 6.98 82.31 136.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/2/2016 6.98 82.31 136.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/3/2016 6.98 82.31 136.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/4/2016 6.98 82.31 136.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/5/2016 6.98 82.31 136.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/6/2016 6.98 82.31 136.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/7/2016 6.98 82.31 136.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/8/2016 6.98 82.31 136.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/9/2016 6.98 82.31 136.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/10/2016 6.98 82.31 136.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/11/2016 6.98 82.31 136.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/12/2016 6.98 82.31 136.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/13/2016 6.98 82.31 136.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/14/2016 6.98 82.31 136.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
56 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
7/15/2016 6.98 82.31 136.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/16/2016 6.98 82.31 136.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/17/2016 6.98 82.31 136.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/18/2016 6.98 82.31 136.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/19/2016 6.98 82.31 136.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/20/2016 6.98 82.31 136.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/21/2016 6.98 82.31 136.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/22/2016 6.98 82.31 136.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/23/2016 6.98 82.31 136.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/24/2016 6.98 82.31 136.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/25/2016 6.98 82.31 136.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/26/2016 6.98 82.31 136.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/27/2016 6.98 82.31 136.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/28/2016 6.98 82.31 136.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/29/2016 6.98 82.31 136.31 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/30/2016 6.98 82.31 136.31 21.40 19.96 0.00
7/31/2016 6.98 82.31 136.31 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/1/2016 23.68 82.31 167.76 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/2/2016 23.68 82.31 167.76 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/3/2016 23.68 82.31 167.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/4/2016 23.68 82.31 167.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/5/2016 23.68 82.31 167.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/6/2016 23.68 82.31 167.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/7/2016 23.68 82.31 167.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/8/2016 23.68 82.31 167.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/9/2016 23.68 82.31 167.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/10/2016 23.68 82.31 167.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/11/2016 23.68 82.31 167.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/12/2016 23.68 82.31 167.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/13/2016 23.68 82.31 167.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/14/2016 23.68 82.31 167.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/15/2016 23.68 82.31 167.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/16/2016 23.68 82.31 167.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/17/2016 23.68 82.31 167.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/18/2016 23.68 82.31 167.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/19/2016 23.68 82.31 167.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/20/2016 23.68 82.31 167.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/21/2016 23.68 82.31 167.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/22/2016 23.68 82.31 167.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/23/2016 23.68 82.31 167.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/24/2016 23.68 82.31 167.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/25/2016 23.68 82.31 167.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/26/2016 23.68 82.31 167.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/27/2016 23.68 82.31 167.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/28/2016 23.68 82.31 167.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/29/2016 23.68 82.31 167.78 21.40 19.96 0.00
8/30/2016 23.68 82.31 167.79 21.40 19.96 0.00
57 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
8/31/2016 23.68 82.31 167.79 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/1/2016 24.52 82.31 167.79 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/2/2016 24.52 82.31 167.79 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/3/2016 24.52 82.31 167.79 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/4/2016 24.52 82.31 167.79 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/5/2016 24.52 82.31 167.79 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/6/2016 24.52 82.31 167.79 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/7/2016 24.52 82.31 167.79 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/8/2016 24.52 82.31 167.79 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/9/2016 24.52 82.31 167.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/10/2016 24.52 82.31 167.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/11/2016 24.52 82.31 167.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/12/2016 24.52 82.31 167.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/13/2016 24.52 82.31 167.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/14/2016 24.52 82.31 167.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/15/2016 24.52 82.31 167.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/16/2016 24.52 82.31 167.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/17/2016 24.52 82.31 167.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/18/2016 24.52 82.31 167.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/19/2016 24.52 82.31 167.81 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/20/2016 24.52 82.31 167.81 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/21/2016 24.52 82.31 167.81 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/22/2016 24.52 82.31 167.82 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/23/2016 24.52 82.31 167.84 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/24/2016 24.52 82.31 167.85 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/25/2016 24.52 82.31 167.87 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/26/2016 24.52 82.31 167.89 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/27/2016 24.52 82.31 167.90 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/28/2016 24.52 82.31 167.92 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/29/2016 24.52 82.31 167.93 21.40 19.96 0.00
9/30/2016 24.52 82.31 167.95 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/1/2016 20.72 82.31 141.72 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/2/2016 20.72 82.31 141.73 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/3/2016 20.72 82.31 141.75 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/4/2016 20.72 82.31 141.76 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/5/2016 20.72 82.31 141.77 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/6/2016 20.72 82.31 141.79 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/7/2016 20.72 82.31 141.80 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/8/2016 20.72 82.31 141.82 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/9/2016 20.72 82.31 141.83 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/10/2016 20.72 82.31 141.84 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/11/2016 20.72 82.31 141.86 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/12/2016 20.72 82.31 141.87 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/13/2016 20.72 82.31 141.88 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/14/2016 20.72 82.31 141.90 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/15/2016 20.72 82.31 141.91 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/16/2016 20.72 82.31 141.92 21.40 19.96 0.00
58 of 59
Table 2A Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 500
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
10/17/2016 20.72 82.31 141.94 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/18/2016 20.72 82.31 141.95 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/19/2016 20.72 82.31 141.96 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/20/2016 20.72 82.31 141.98 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/21/2016 20.72 82.31 141.99 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/22/2016 20.72 82.31 142.00 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/23/2016 20.72 82.31 142.02 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/24/2016 20.72 82.31 142.03 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/25/2016 20.72 82.31 142.04 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/26/2016 20.72 82.31 142.06 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/27/2016 20.72 82.31 142.07 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/28/2016 20.72 82.31 142.09 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/29/2016 20.72 82.31 142.10 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/30/2016 20.72 82.31 142.11 21.40 19.96 0.00
10/31/2016 20.72 82.31 142.13 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/1/2016 12.90 82.31 98.27 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/2/2016 12.90 82.31 98.28 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/3/2016 12.90 82.31 98.29 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/4/2016 12.90 82.31 98.30 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/5/2016 12.90 82.31 98.31 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/6/2016 12.90 82.31 98.32 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/7/2016 12.90 82.31 98.33 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/8/2016 12.90 82.31 98.33 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/9/2016 12.90 82.31 98.34 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/10/2016 12.90 82.31 98.35 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/11/2016 12.90 82.31 98.36 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/12/2016 12.90 82.31 98.37 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/13/2016 12.90 82.31 98.38 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/14/2016 12.90 82.31 98.39 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/15/2016 12.90 82.31 98.40 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/16/2016 12.90 82.31 98.41 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/17/2016 12.90 82.31 98.42 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/18/2016 12.90 82.31 98.43 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/19/2016 12.90 82.31 98.44 21.40 19.96 0.00
11/20/2016 12.90 82.31 98.45 21.40 19.96 0.00
59 of 59
Table 2B Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 750
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
5/1/2009 3.80 123.75 0.00 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/2/2009 3.80 123.75 1.31 32.18 105.48 75.48
5/3/2009 3.80 123.75 2.19 32.18 105.48 75.48
5/4/2009 3.80 123.75 3.07 32.18 105.48 75.48
5/5/2009 3.80 123.75 3.95 32.18 105.48 75.48
5/6/2009 3.80 123.75 4.83 32.18 105.48 75.48
5/7/2009 3.80 123.75 5.70 32.18 105.48 75.48
5/8/2009 3.80 123.75 6.58 32.18 105.48 75.48
5/9/2009 3.80 123.75 7.34 32.18 105.48 75.48
5/10/2009 3.80 123.75 7.71 32.18 105.48 75.48
5/11/2009 3.80 123.75 8.08 32.18 105.48 75.48
5/12/2009 3.80 123.75 8.45 32.18 105.48 75.48
5/13/2009 3.80 123.75 8.81 32.18 105.48 75.48
5/14/2009 3.80 123.75 9.18 32.18 105.48 75.48
5/15/2009 3.80 123.75 9.55 32.18 105.48 75.48
5/16/2009 3.80 123.75 9.91 32.18 105.48 75.48
5/17/2009 3.80 123.75 10.28 32.18 105.48 75.48
5/18/2009 3.80 123.75 10.65 32.18 105.48 75.48
5/19/2009 3.80 123.75 11.01 32.18 105.48 75.48
5/20/2009 3.80 123.75 11.38 32.18 105.48 75.48
5/21/2009 3.80 123.75 11.74 32.18 105.48 75.48
5/22/2009 3.80 123.75 12.11 32.18 105.48 75.48
5/23/2009 3.80 123.75 12.47 32.18 105.48 75.48
5/24/2009 3.80 123.75 12.83 32.18 105.48 75.48
5/25/2009 3.80 123.75 13.20 32.18 105.48 75.48
5/26/2009 3.80 123.75 13.56 32.18 105.48 75.48
5/27/2009 3.80 123.75 13.92 32.18 105.48 75.48
5/28/2009 3.80 123.75 14.29 32.18 105.48 75.48
5/29/2009 3.80 123.75 14.65 32.18 105.48 75.48
5/30/2009 3.80 123.75 15.01 32.18 105.48 75.48
5/31/2009 3.80 123.75 15.37 32.18 105.48 75.48
6/1/2009 5.28 123.75 21.69 32.18 105.48 75.48
6/2/2009 5.28 123.75 22.18 32.18 105.48 75.48
6/3/2009 5.28 123.75 22.67 32.18 105.48 75.48
6/4/2009 5.28 123.75 23.16 32.18 105.48 75.48
6/5/2009 5.28 123.75 23.65 32.18 105.48 75.48
6/6/2009 5.28 123.75 24.14 32.18 105.48 75.48
6/7/2009 5.28 123.75 24.63 32.18 105.48 75.48
6/8/2009 5.28 123.75 25.11 32.18 105.48 75.48
6/9/2009 5.28 123.75 25.60 32.18 105.48 75.48
6/10/2009 5.28 123.75 26.09 32.18 105.48 75.48
6/11/2009 5.28 123.75 26.57 32.18 105.48 75.48
6/12/2009 5.28 123.75 27.06 32.18 105.48 75.48
6/13/2009 5.28 123.75 27.47 32.18 105.48 75.48
6/14/2009 5.28 123.75 27.75 32.18 105.48 75.48
6/15/2009 5.28 123.75 28.02 32.18 105.48 75.48
6/16/2009 5.28 123.75 28.30 32.18 105.48 75.48
1 of 31
Table 2B Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 750
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
6/17/2009 5.28 123.75 28.58 32.18 105.48 75.48
6/18/2009 5.28 123.75 28.85 32.18 105.48 75.48
6/19/2009 5.28 123.75 29.13 32.18 105.48 75.48
6/20/2009 5.28 123.75 29.40 32.18 105.48 75.48
6/21/2009 5.28 123.75 29.68 32.18 105.48 75.48
6/22/2009 5.28 123.75 29.96 32.18 105.48 75.48
6/23/2009 5.28 123.75 30.23 32.18 105.48 75.48
6/24/2009 5.28 123.75 30.51 32.18 105.48 75.48
6/25/2009 5.28 123.75 30.78 32.18 105.48 75.48
6/26/2009 5.28 123.75 31.06 32.18 105.48 75.48
6/27/2009 5.28 123.75 31.33 32.18 105.48 75.48
6/28/2009 5.28 123.75 31.61 32.18 105.48 75.48
6/29/2009 5.28 123.75 31.88 32.18 105.48 75.48
6/30/2009 5.28 123.75 32.15 32.18 105.48 75.48
7/1/2009 6.98 123.75 49.59 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/2/2009 6.98 123.75 49.78 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/3/2009 6.98 123.75 49.96 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/4/2009 6.98 123.75 50.14 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/5/2009 6.98 123.75 50.32 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/6/2009 6.98 123.75 50.50 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/7/2009 6.98 123.75 50.68 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/8/2009 6.98 123.75 50.86 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/9/2009 6.98 123.75 51.04 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/10/2009 6.98 123.75 51.21 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/11/2009 6.98 123.75 51.39 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/12/2009 6.98 123.75 51.57 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/13/2009 6.98 123.75 51.75 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/14/2009 6.98 123.75 51.93 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/15/2009 6.98 123.75 52.11 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/16/2009 6.98 123.75 52.28 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/17/2009 6.98 123.75 52.46 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/18/2009 6.98 123.75 52.64 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/19/2009 6.98 123.75 52.82 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/20/2009 6.98 123.75 52.99 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/21/2009 6.98 123.75 53.17 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/22/2009 6.98 123.75 53.35 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/23/2009 6.98 123.75 53.52 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/24/2009 6.98 123.75 53.70 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/25/2009 6.98 123.75 53.88 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/26/2009 6.98 123.75 54.05 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/27/2009 6.98 123.75 54.23 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/28/2009 6.98 123.75 54.40 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/29/2009 6.98 123.75 54.58 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/30/2009 6.98 123.75 54.75 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/31/2009 6.98 123.75 54.93 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/1/2009 23.68 123.75 67.82 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/2/2009 23.68 123.75 68.06 32.18 30.01 0.00
2 of 31
Table 2B Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 750
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
8/3/2009 23.68 123.75 68.30 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/4/2009 23.68 123.75 68.53 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/5/2009 23.68 123.75 68.77 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/6/2009 23.68 123.75 69.01 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/7/2009 23.68 123.75 69.25 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/8/2009 23.68 123.75 69.48 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/9/2009 23.68 123.75 69.72 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/10/2009 23.68 123.75 69.96 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/11/2009 23.68 123.75 70.19 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/12/2009 23.68 123.75 70.43 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/13/2009 23.68 123.75 70.66 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/14/2009 23.68 123.75 70.90 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/15/2009 23.68 123.75 71.13 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/16/2009 23.68 123.75 71.36 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/17/2009 23.68 123.75 71.60 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/18/2009 23.68 123.75 71.83 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/19/2009 23.68 123.75 72.06 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/20/2009 23.68 123.75 72.30 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/21/2009 23.68 123.75 72.53 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/22/2009 23.68 123.75 72.76 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/23/2009 23.68 123.75 72.99 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/24/2009 23.68 123.75 73.22 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/25/2009 23.68 123.75 73.45 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/26/2009 23.68 123.75 73.68 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/27/2009 23.68 123.75 73.91 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/28/2009 23.68 123.75 74.14 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/29/2009 23.68 123.75 74.37 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/30/2009 23.68 123.75 74.60 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/31/2009 23.68 123.75 74.83 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/1/2009 24.52 123.75 75.06 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/2/2009 24.52 123.75 75.29 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/3/2009 24.52 123.75 75.52 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/4/2009 24.52 123.75 75.75 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/5/2009 24.52 123.75 75.98 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/6/2009 24.52 123.75 76.21 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/7/2009 24.52 123.75 76.44 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/8/2009 24.52 123.75 76.67 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/9/2009 24.52 123.75 76.89 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/10/2009 24.52 123.75 77.12 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/11/2009 24.52 123.75 77.35 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/12/2009 24.52 123.75 77.58 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/13/2009 24.52 123.75 77.80 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/14/2009 24.52 123.75 78.03 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/15/2009 24.52 123.75 78.26 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/16/2009 24.52 123.75 78.48 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/17/2009 24.52 123.75 78.71 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/18/2009 24.52 123.75 78.93 32.18 30.01 0.00
3 of 31
Table 2B Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 750
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
9/19/2009 24.52 123.75 79.16 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/20/2009 24.52 123.75 79.38 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/21/2009 24.52 123.75 79.61 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/22/2009 24.52 123.75 79.83 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/23/2009 24.52 123.75 80.05 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/24/2009 24.52 123.75 80.28 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/25/2009 24.52 123.75 80.50 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/26/2009 24.52 123.75 80.72 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/27/2009 24.52 123.75 80.95 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/28/2009 24.52 123.75 81.17 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/29/2009 24.52 123.75 81.39 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/30/2009 24.52 123.75 81.61 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/1/2009 20.72 123.75 69.05 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/2/2009 20.72 123.75 69.24 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/3/2009 20.72 123.75 69.43 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/4/2009 20.72 123.75 69.63 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/5/2009 20.72 123.75 69.82 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/6/2009 20.72 123.75 70.01 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/7/2009 20.72 123.75 70.21 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/8/2009 20.72 123.75 70.40 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/9/2009 20.72 123.75 70.59 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/10/2009 20.72 123.75 70.79 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/11/2009 20.72 123.75 70.98 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/12/2009 20.72 123.75 71.17 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/13/2009 20.72 123.75 71.36 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/14/2009 20.72 123.75 71.55 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/15/2009 20.72 123.75 71.74 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/16/2009 20.72 123.75 71.94 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/17/2009 20.72 123.75 72.13 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/18/2009 20.72 123.75 72.32 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/19/2009 20.72 123.75 72.51 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/20/2009 20.72 123.75 72.70 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/21/2009 20.72 123.75 72.89 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/22/2009 20.72 123.75 73.08 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/23/2009 20.72 123.75 73.27 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/24/2009 20.72 123.75 73.46 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/25/2009 20.72 123.75 73.65 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/26/2009 20.72 123.75 73.83 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/27/2009 20.72 123.75 74.02 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/28/2009 20.72 123.75 74.21 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/29/2009 20.72 123.75 74.40 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/30/2009 20.72 123.75 74.59 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/31/2009 20.72 123.75 74.78 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/1/2009 12.90 123.75 51.82 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/2/2009 12.90 123.75 51.91 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/3/2009 12.90 123.75 52.00 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/4/2009 12.90 123.75 52.09 32.18 30.01 0.00
4 of 31
Table 2B Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 750
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
11/5/2009 12.90 123.75 52.18 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/6/2009 12.90 123.75 52.27 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/7/2009 12.90 123.75 52.36 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/8/2009 12.90 123.75 52.45 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/9/2009 12.90 123.75 52.54 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/10/2009 12.90 123.75 52.63 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/11/2009 12.90 123.75 52.72 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/12/2009 12.90 123.75 52.80 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/13/2009 12.90 123.75 52.89 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/14/2009 12.90 123.75 52.98 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/15/2009 12.90 123.75 53.07 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/16/2009 12.90 123.75 53.16 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/17/2009 12.90 123.75 53.25 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/18/2009 12.90 123.75 53.34 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/19/2009 12.90 123.75 53.43 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/20/2009 12.90 123.75 53.51 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/21/2009 12.90 123.75 53.60 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/22/2009 12.90 123.75 53.69 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/23/2009 12.90 123.75 53.78 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/24/2009 12.90 123.75 53.87 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/25/2009 12.90 123.75 53.96 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/26/2009 12.90 123.75 54.05 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/27/2009 12.90 123.75 54.13 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/28/2009 12.90 123.75 54.22 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/29/2009 12.90 123.75 54.31 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/30/2009 12.90 123.75 54.40 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/1/2009 7.82 123.75 36.00 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/2/2009 7.82 123.75 36.06 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/3/2009 7.82 123.75 36.13 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/4/2009 7.82 123.75 36.19 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/5/2009 7.82 123.75 36.25 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/6/2009 7.82 123.75 36.31 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/7/2009 7.82 123.75 36.37 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/8/2009 7.82 123.75 36.44 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/9/2009 7.82 123.75 36.50 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/10/2009 7.82 123.75 36.56 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/11/2009 7.82 123.75 36.62 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/12/2009 7.82 123.75 36.69 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/13/2009 7.82 123.75 36.75 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/14/2009 7.82 123.75 36.81 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/15/2009 7.82 123.75 36.87 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/16/2009 7.82 123.75 36.93 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/17/2009 7.82 123.75 37.00 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/18/2009 7.82 123.75 37.06 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/19/2009 7.82 123.75 37.12 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/20/2009 7.82 123.75 37.18 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/21/2009 7.82 123.75 37.24 32.18 30.01 0.00
5 of 31
Table 2B Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 750
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
12/22/2009 7.82 123.75 37.31 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/23/2009 7.82 123.75 37.37 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/24/2009 7.82 123.75 37.43 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/25/2009 7.82 123.75 37.49 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/26/2009 7.82 123.75 37.55 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/27/2009 7.82 123.75 37.61 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/28/2009 7.82 123.75 37.68 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/29/2009 7.82 123.75 37.74 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/30/2009 7.82 123.75 37.80 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/31/2009 7.82 123.75 37.86 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/1/2010 9.94 123.75 31.77 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/2/2010 9.94 123.75 31.83 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/3/2010 9.94 123.75 31.88 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/4/2010 9.94 123.75 31.94 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/5/2010 9.94 123.75 31.99 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/6/2010 9.94 123.75 32.04 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/7/2010 9.94 123.75 32.10 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/8/2010 9.94 123.75 32.15 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/9/2010 9.94 123.75 32.21 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/10/2010 9.94 123.75 32.26 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/11/2010 9.94 123.75 32.32 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/12/2010 9.94 123.75 32.37 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/13/2010 9.94 123.75 32.42 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/14/2010 9.94 123.75 32.48 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/15/2010 9.94 123.75 32.53 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/16/2010 9.94 123.75 32.59 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/17/2010 9.94 123.75 32.64 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/18/2010 9.94 123.75 32.69 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/19/2010 9.94 123.75 32.75 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/20/2010 9.94 123.75 32.80 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/21/2010 9.94 123.75 32.86 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/22/2010 9.94 123.75 32.91 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/23/2010 9.94 123.75 32.96 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/24/2010 9.94 123.75 33.02 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/25/2010 9.94 123.75 33.07 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/26/2010 9.94 123.75 33.12 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/27/2010 9.94 123.75 33.18 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/28/2010 9.94 123.75 33.23 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/29/2010 9.94 123.75 33.29 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/30/2010 9.94 123.75 33.34 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/31/2010 9.94 123.75 33.39 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/1/2010 8.88 123.75 31.29 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/2/2010 8.88 123.75 31.34 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/3/2010 8.88 123.75 31.39 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/4/2010 8.88 123.75 31.44 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/5/2010 8.88 123.75 31.49 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/6/2010 8.88 123.75 31.54 32.18 30.01 0.00
6 of 31
Table 2B Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 750
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
2/7/2010 8.88 123.75 31.59 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/8/2010 8.88 123.75 31.64 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/9/2010 8.88 123.75 31.69 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/10/2010 8.88 123.75 31.74 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/11/2010 8.88 123.75 31.79 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/12/2010 8.88 123.75 31.85 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/13/2010 8.88 123.75 31.90 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/14/2010 8.88 123.75 31.95 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/15/2010 8.88 123.75 32.00 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/16/2010 8.88 123.75 32.05 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/17/2010 8.88 123.75 32.10 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/18/2010 8.88 123.75 32.15 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/19/2010 8.88 123.75 32.20 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/20/2010 8.88 123.75 32.25 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/21/2010 8.88 123.75 32.30 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/22/2010 8.88 123.75 32.35 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/23/2010 8.88 123.75 32.40 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/24/2010 8.88 123.75 32.45 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/25/2010 8.88 123.75 32.50 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/26/2010 8.88 123.75 32.55 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/27/2010 8.88 123.75 32.60 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/28/2010 8.88 123.75 32.65 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/1/2010 15.85 123.75 34.95 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/2/2010 15.85 123.75 35.01 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/3/2010 15.85 123.75 35.07 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/4/2010 15.85 123.75 35.12 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/5/2010 15.85 123.75 35.18 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/6/2010 15.85 123.75 35.23 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/7/2010 15.85 123.75 35.29 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/8/2010 15.85 123.75 35.34 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/9/2010 15.85 123.75 35.40 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/10/2010 15.85 123.75 35.46 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/11/2010 15.85 123.75 35.51 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/12/2010 15.85 123.75 35.57 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/13/2010 15.85 123.75 35.62 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/14/2010 15.85 123.75 35.68 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/15/2010 15.85 123.75 35.73 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/16/2010 15.85 123.75 35.79 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/17/2010 15.85 123.75 35.84 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/18/2010 15.85 123.75 35.90 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/19/2010 15.85 123.75 35.96 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/20/2010 15.85 123.75 36.01 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/21/2010 15.85 123.75 36.07 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/22/2010 15.85 123.75 36.12 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/23/2010 15.85 123.75 36.18 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/24/2010 15.85 123.75 36.23 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/25/2010 15.85 123.75 36.29 32.18 30.01 0.00
7 of 31
Table 2B Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 750
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
3/26/2010 15.85 123.75 36.34 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/27/2010 15.85 123.75 36.40 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/28/2010 15.85 123.75 36.45 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/29/2010 15.85 123.75 36.51 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/30/2010 15.85 123.75 36.56 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/31/2010 15.85 123.75 36.62 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/1/2010 2.11 123.75 37.86 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/2/2010 2.11 123.75 37.91 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/3/2010 2.11 123.75 37.96 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/4/2010 2.11 123.75 38.01 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/5/2010 2.11 123.75 38.06 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/6/2010 2.11 123.75 38.11 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/7/2010 2.11 123.75 38.16 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/8/2010 2.11 123.75 38.22 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/9/2010 2.11 123.75 38.27 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/10/2010 2.11 123.75 38.32 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/11/2010 2.11 123.75 38.37 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/12/2010 2.11 123.75 38.42 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/13/2010 2.11 123.75 38.47 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/14/2010 2.11 123.75 38.52 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/15/2010 2.11 123.75 38.57 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/16/2010 2.11 123.75 38.62 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/17/2010 2.11 123.75 38.68 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/18/2010 2.11 123.75 38.73 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/19/2010 2.11 123.75 38.78 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/20/2010 2.11 123.75 38.83 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/21/2010 2.11 123.75 38.88 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/22/2010 2.11 123.75 38.93 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/23/2010 2.11 123.75 38.98 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/24/2010 2.11 123.75 39.03 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/25/2010 2.11 123.75 39.08 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/26/2010 2.11 123.75 39.13 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/27/2010 2.11 123.75 39.18 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/28/2010 2.11 123.75 39.23 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/29/2010 2.11 123.75 39.29 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/30/2010 2.11 123.75 39.34 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/1/2010 3.80 123.75 45.54 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/2/2010 3.80 123.75 45.60 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/3/2010 3.80 123.75 45.66 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/4/2010 3.80 123.75 45.71 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/5/2010 3.80 123.75 45.77 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/6/2010 3.80 123.75 45.83 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/7/2010 3.80 123.75 45.88 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/8/2010 3.80 123.75 45.94 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/9/2010 3.80 123.75 46.00 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/10/2010 3.80 123.75 46.05 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/11/2010 3.80 123.75 46.11 32.18 30.01 0.00
8 of 31
Table 2B Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 750
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
5/12/2010 3.80 123.75 46.17 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/13/2010 3.80 123.75 46.23 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/14/2010 3.80 123.75 46.28 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/15/2010 3.80 123.75 46.34 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/16/2010 3.80 123.75 46.40 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/17/2010 3.80 123.75 46.45 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/18/2010 3.80 123.75 46.51 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/19/2010 3.80 123.75 46.57 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/20/2010 3.80 123.75 46.62 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/21/2010 3.80 123.75 46.68 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/22/2010 3.80 123.75 46.74 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/23/2010 3.80 123.75 46.79 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/24/2010 3.80 123.75 46.85 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/25/2010 3.80 123.75 46.91 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/26/2010 3.80 123.75 46.96 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/27/2010 3.80 123.75 47.02 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/28/2010 3.80 123.75 47.08 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/29/2010 3.80 123.75 47.13 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/30/2010 3.80 123.75 47.19 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/31/2010 3.80 123.75 47.25 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/1/2010 5.28 123.75 65.20 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/2/2010 5.28 123.75 65.27 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/3/2010 5.28 123.75 65.34 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/4/2010 5.28 123.75 65.41 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/5/2010 5.28 123.75 65.48 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/6/2010 5.28 123.75 65.55 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/7/2010 5.28 123.75 65.62 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/8/2010 5.28 123.75 65.69 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/9/2010 5.28 123.75 65.76 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/10/2010 5.28 123.75 65.83 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/11/2010 5.28 123.75 65.90 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/12/2010 5.28 123.75 65.97 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/13/2010 5.28 123.75 66.04 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/14/2010 5.28 123.75 66.11 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/15/2010 5.28 123.75 66.18 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/16/2010 5.28 123.75 66.24 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/17/2010 5.28 123.75 66.31 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/18/2010 5.28 123.75 66.38 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/19/2010 5.28 123.75 66.45 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/20/2010 5.28 123.75 66.52 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/21/2010 5.28 123.75 66.59 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/22/2010 5.28 123.75 66.66 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/23/2010 5.28 123.75 66.73 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/24/2010 5.28 123.75 66.80 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/25/2010 5.28 123.75 66.87 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/26/2010 5.28 123.75 66.94 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/27/2010 5.28 123.75 67.01 32.18 30.01 0.00
9 of 31
Table 2B Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 750
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
6/28/2010 5.28 123.75 67.07 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/29/2010 5.28 123.75 67.14 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/30/2010 5.28 123.75 67.21 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/1/2010 6.98 123.75 102.90 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/2/2010 6.98 123.75 102.98 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/3/2010 6.98 123.75 103.06 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/4/2010 6.98 123.75 103.13 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/5/2010 6.98 123.75 103.17 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/6/2010 6.98 123.75 103.20 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/7/2010 6.98 123.75 103.24 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/8/2010 6.98 123.75 103.27 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/9/2010 6.98 123.75 103.31 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/10/2010 6.98 123.75 103.34 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/11/2010 6.98 123.75 103.38 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/12/2010 6.98 123.75 103.41 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/13/2010 6.98 123.75 103.45 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/14/2010 6.98 123.75 103.48 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/15/2010 6.98 123.75 103.52 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/16/2010 6.98 123.75 103.55 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/17/2010 6.98 123.75 103.59 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/18/2010 6.98 123.75 103.62 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/19/2010 6.98 123.75 103.66 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/20/2010 6.98 123.75 103.69 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/21/2010 6.98 123.75 103.72 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/22/2010 6.98 123.75 103.76 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/23/2010 6.98 123.75 103.79 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/24/2010 6.98 123.75 103.83 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/25/2010 6.98 123.75 103.86 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/26/2010 6.98 123.75 103.90 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/27/2010 6.98 123.75 103.93 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/28/2010 6.98 123.75 103.97 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/29/2010 6.98 123.75 104.00 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/30/2010 6.98 123.75 104.04 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/31/2010 6.98 123.75 104.07 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/1/2010 23.68 123.75 128.13 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/2/2010 23.68 123.75 128.17 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/3/2010 23.68 123.75 128.22 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/4/2010 23.68 123.75 128.26 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/5/2010 23.68 123.75 128.31 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/6/2010 23.68 123.75 128.35 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/7/2010 23.68 123.75 128.40 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/8/2010 23.68 123.75 128.44 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/9/2010 23.68 123.75 128.49 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/10/2010 23.68 123.75 128.53 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/11/2010 23.68 123.75 128.58 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/12/2010 23.68 123.75 128.62 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/13/2010 23.68 123.75 128.67 32.18 30.01 0.00
10 of 31
Table 2B Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 750
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
8/14/2010 23.68 123.75 128.71 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/15/2010 23.68 123.75 128.76 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/16/2010 23.68 123.75 128.80 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/17/2010 23.68 123.75 128.85 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/18/2010 23.68 123.75 128.89 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/19/2010 23.68 123.75 128.93 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/20/2010 23.68 123.75 128.98 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/21/2010 23.68 123.75 129.02 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/22/2010 23.68 123.75 129.07 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/23/2010 23.68 123.75 129.11 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/24/2010 23.68 123.75 129.16 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/25/2010 23.68 123.75 129.20 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/26/2010 23.68 123.75 129.25 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/27/2010 23.68 123.75 129.29 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/28/2010 23.68 123.75 129.33 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/29/2010 23.68 123.75 129.38 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/30/2010 23.68 123.75 129.42 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/31/2010 23.68 123.75 129.47 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/1/2010 24.52 123.75 129.51 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/2/2010 24.52 123.75 129.56 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/3/2010 24.52 123.75 129.60 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/4/2010 24.52 123.75 129.65 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/5/2010 24.52 123.75 129.69 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/6/2010 24.52 123.75 129.74 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/7/2010 24.52 123.75 129.78 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/8/2010 24.52 123.75 129.83 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/9/2010 24.52 123.75 129.87 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/10/2010 24.52 123.75 129.91 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/11/2010 24.52 123.75 129.96 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/12/2010 24.52 123.75 130.00 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/13/2010 24.52 123.75 130.05 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/14/2010 24.52 123.75 130.09 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/15/2010 24.52 123.75 130.14 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/16/2010 24.52 123.75 130.18 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/17/2010 24.52 123.75 130.23 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/18/2010 24.52 123.75 130.27 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/19/2010 24.52 123.75 130.32 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/20/2010 24.52 123.75 130.36 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/21/2010 24.52 123.75 130.41 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/22/2010 24.52 123.75 130.45 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/23/2010 24.52 123.75 130.49 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/24/2010 24.52 123.75 130.54 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/25/2010 24.52 123.75 130.58 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/26/2010 24.52 123.75 130.63 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/27/2010 24.52 123.75 130.67 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/28/2010 24.52 123.75 130.72 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/29/2010 24.52 123.75 130.76 32.18 30.01 0.00
11 of 31
Table 2B Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 750
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
9/30/2010 24.52 123.75 130.80 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/1/2010 20.72 123.75 110.40 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/2/2010 20.72 123.75 110.45 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/3/2010 20.72 123.75 110.49 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/4/2010 20.72 123.75 110.53 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/5/2010 20.72 123.75 110.57 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/6/2010 20.72 123.75 110.62 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/7/2010 20.72 123.75 110.66 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/8/2010 20.72 123.75 110.70 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/9/2010 20.72 123.75 110.74 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/10/2010 20.72 123.75 110.78 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/11/2010 20.72 123.75 110.83 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/12/2010 20.72 123.75 110.87 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/13/2010 20.72 123.75 110.91 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/14/2010 20.72 123.75 110.95 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/15/2010 20.72 123.75 110.99 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/16/2010 20.72 123.75 111.04 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/17/2010 20.72 123.75 111.08 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/18/2010 20.72 123.75 111.12 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/19/2010 20.72 123.75 111.16 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/20/2010 20.72 123.75 111.21 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/21/2010 20.72 123.75 111.25 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/22/2010 20.72 123.75 111.29 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/23/2010 20.72 123.75 111.33 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/24/2010 20.72 123.75 111.37 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/25/2010 20.72 123.75 111.42 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/26/2010 20.72 123.75 111.46 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/27/2010 20.72 123.75 111.50 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/28/2010 20.72 123.75 111.54 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/29/2010 20.72 123.75 111.58 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/30/2010 20.72 123.75 111.62 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/31/2010 20.72 123.75 111.67 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/1/2010 12.90 123.75 77.23 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/2/2010 12.90 123.75 77.26 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/3/2010 12.90 123.75 77.30 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/4/2010 12.90 123.75 77.33 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/5/2010 12.90 123.75 77.36 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/6/2010 12.90 123.75 77.40 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/7/2010 12.90 123.75 77.43 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/8/2010 12.90 123.75 77.46 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/9/2010 12.90 123.75 77.50 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/10/2010 12.90 123.75 77.53 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/11/2010 12.90 123.75 77.56 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/12/2010 12.90 123.75 77.60 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/13/2010 12.90 123.75 77.63 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/14/2010 12.90 123.75 77.66 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/15/2010 12.90 123.75 77.69 32.18 30.01 0.00
12 of 31
Table 2B Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 750
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
11/16/2010 12.90 123.75 77.73 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/17/2010 12.90 123.75 77.76 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/18/2010 12.90 123.75 77.79 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/19/2010 12.90 123.75 77.83 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/20/2010 12.90 123.75 77.86 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/21/2010 12.90 123.75 77.89 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/22/2010 12.90 123.75 77.93 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/23/2010 12.90 123.75 77.96 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/24/2010 12.90 123.75 77.99 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/25/2010 12.90 123.75 78.03 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/26/2010 12.90 123.75 78.06 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/27/2010 12.90 123.75 78.09 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/28/2010 12.90 123.75 78.12 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/29/2010 12.90 123.75 78.16 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/30/2010 12.90 123.75 78.19 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/1/2010 7.82 123.75 51.68 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/2/2010 7.82 123.75 51.71 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/3/2010 7.82 123.75 51.73 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/4/2010 7.82 123.75 51.76 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/5/2010 7.82 123.75 51.78 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/6/2010 7.82 123.75 51.81 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/7/2010 7.82 123.75 51.83 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/8/2010 7.82 123.75 51.86 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/9/2010 7.82 123.75 51.88 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/10/2010 7.82 123.75 51.91 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/11/2010 7.82 123.75 51.93 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/12/2010 7.82 123.75 51.96 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/13/2010 7.82 123.75 51.98 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/14/2010 7.82 123.75 52.01 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/15/2010 7.82 123.75 52.03 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/16/2010 7.82 123.75 52.06 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/17/2010 7.82 123.75 52.08 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/18/2010 7.82 123.75 52.10 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/19/2010 7.82 123.75 52.13 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/20/2010 7.82 123.75 52.15 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/21/2010 7.82 123.75 52.18 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/22/2010 7.82 123.75 52.20 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/23/2010 7.82 123.75 52.23 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/24/2010 7.82 123.75 52.25 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/25/2010 7.82 123.75 52.28 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/26/2010 7.82 123.75 52.30 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/27/2010 7.82 123.75 52.33 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/28/2010 7.82 123.75 52.35 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/29/2010 7.82 123.75 52.38 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/30/2010 7.82 123.75 52.40 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/31/2010 7.82 123.75 52.43 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/1/2011 9.94 123.75 43.95 32.18 30.01 0.00
13 of 31
Table 2B Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 750
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
1/2/2011 9.94 123.75 43.97 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/3/2011 9.94 123.75 43.99 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/4/2011 9.94 123.75 44.01 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/5/2011 9.94 123.75 44.03 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/6/2011 9.94 123.75 44.06 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/7/2011 9.94 123.75 44.08 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/8/2011 9.94 123.75 44.10 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/9/2011 9.94 123.75 44.12 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/10/2011 9.94 123.75 44.15 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/11/2011 9.94 123.75 44.17 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/12/2011 9.94 123.75 44.19 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/13/2011 9.94 123.75 44.21 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/14/2011 9.94 123.75 44.23 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/15/2011 9.94 123.75 44.26 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/16/2011 9.94 123.75 44.28 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/17/2011 9.94 123.75 44.30 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/18/2011 9.94 123.75 44.32 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/19/2011 9.94 123.75 44.34 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/20/2011 9.94 123.75 44.37 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/21/2011 9.94 123.75 44.39 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/22/2011 9.94 123.75 44.41 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/23/2011 9.94 123.75 44.43 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/24/2011 9.94 123.75 44.45 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/25/2011 9.94 123.75 44.48 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/26/2011 9.94 123.75 44.50 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/27/2011 9.94 123.75 44.52 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/28/2011 9.94 123.75 44.54 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/29/2011 9.94 123.75 44.57 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/30/2011 9.94 123.75 44.59 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/31/2011 9.94 123.75 44.61 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/1/2011 8.88 123.75 41.75 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/2/2011 8.88 123.75 41.77 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/3/2011 8.88 123.75 41.79 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/4/2011 8.88 123.75 41.81 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/5/2011 8.88 123.75 41.84 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/6/2011 8.88 123.75 41.86 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/7/2011 8.88 123.75 41.88 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/8/2011 8.88 123.75 41.90 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/9/2011 8.88 123.75 41.92 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/10/2011 8.88 123.75 41.94 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/11/2011 8.88 123.75 41.96 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/12/2011 8.88 123.75 41.98 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/13/2011 8.88 123.75 42.00 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/14/2011 8.88 123.75 42.02 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/15/2011 8.88 123.75 42.04 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/16/2011 8.88 123.75 42.06 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/17/2011 8.88 123.75 42.09 32.18 30.01 0.00
14 of 31
Table 2B Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 750
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
2/18/2011 8.88 123.75 42.11 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/19/2011 8.88 123.75 42.13 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/20/2011 8.88 123.75 42.15 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/21/2011 8.88 123.75 42.17 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/22/2011 8.88 123.75 42.19 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/23/2011 8.88 123.75 42.21 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/24/2011 8.88 123.75 42.23 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/25/2011 8.88 123.75 42.25 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/26/2011 8.88 123.75 42.27 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/27/2011 8.88 123.75 42.29 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/28/2011 8.88 123.75 42.31 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/1/2011 15.85 123.75 45.25 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/2/2011 15.85 123.75 45.28 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/3/2011 15.85 123.75 45.30 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/4/2011 15.85 123.75 45.32 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/5/2011 15.85 123.75 45.35 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/6/2011 15.85 123.75 45.37 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/7/2011 15.85 123.75 45.39 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/8/2011 15.85 123.75 45.42 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/9/2011 15.85 123.75 45.44 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/10/2011 15.85 123.75 45.46 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/11/2011 15.85 123.75 45.48 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/12/2011 15.85 123.75 45.51 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/13/2011 15.85 123.75 45.53 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/14/2011 15.85 123.75 45.55 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/15/2011 15.85 123.75 45.58 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/16/2011 15.85 123.75 45.60 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/17/2011 15.85 123.75 45.62 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/18/2011 15.85 123.75 45.65 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/19/2011 15.85 123.75 45.67 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/20/2011 15.85 123.75 45.69 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/21/2011 15.85 123.75 45.71 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/22/2011 15.85 123.75 45.74 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/23/2011 15.85 123.75 45.76 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/24/2011 15.85 123.75 45.78 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/25/2011 15.85 123.75 45.81 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/26/2011 15.85 123.75 45.83 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/27/2011 15.85 123.75 45.85 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/28/2011 15.85 123.75 45.88 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/29/2011 15.85 123.75 45.90 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/30/2011 15.85 123.75 45.92 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/31/2011 15.85 123.75 45.94 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/1/2011 2.11 123.75 47.45 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/2/2011 2.11 123.75 47.47 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/3/2011 2.11 123.75 47.49 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/4/2011 2.11 123.75 47.51 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/5/2011 2.11 123.75 47.53 32.18 30.01 0.00
15 of 31
Table 2B Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 750
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
4/6/2011 2.11 123.75 47.56 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/7/2011 2.11 123.75 47.58 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/8/2011 2.11 123.75 47.60 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/9/2011 2.11 123.75 47.62 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/10/2011 2.11 123.75 47.64 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/11/2011 2.11 123.75 47.66 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/12/2011 2.11 123.75 47.68 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/13/2011 2.11 123.75 47.70 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/14/2011 2.11 123.75 47.72 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/15/2011 2.11 123.75 47.75 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/16/2011 2.11 123.75 47.77 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/17/2011 2.11 123.75 47.79 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/18/2011 2.11 123.75 47.81 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/19/2011 2.11 123.75 47.83 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/20/2011 2.11 123.75 47.85 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/21/2011 2.11 123.75 47.87 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/22/2011 2.11 123.75 47.89 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/23/2011 2.11 123.75 47.91 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/24/2011 2.11 123.75 47.94 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/25/2011 2.11 123.75 47.96 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/26/2011 2.11 123.75 47.98 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/27/2011 2.11 123.75 48.00 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/28/2011 2.11 123.75 48.02 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/29/2011 2.11 123.75 48.04 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/30/2011 2.11 123.75 48.06 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/1/2011 3.80 123.75 55.60 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/2/2011 3.80 123.75 55.62 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/3/2011 3.80 123.75 55.64 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/4/2011 3.80 123.75 55.67 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/5/2011 3.80 123.75 55.69 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/6/2011 3.80 123.75 55.71 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/7/2011 3.80 123.75 55.74 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/8/2011 3.80 123.75 55.76 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/9/2011 3.80 123.75 55.78 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/10/2011 3.80 123.75 55.81 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/11/2011 3.80 123.75 55.83 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/12/2011 3.80 123.75 55.85 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/13/2011 3.80 123.75 55.88 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/14/2011 3.80 123.75 55.90 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/15/2011 3.80 123.75 55.92 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/16/2011 3.80 123.75 55.95 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/17/2011 3.80 123.75 55.97 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/18/2011 3.80 123.75 55.99 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/19/2011 3.80 123.75 56.02 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/20/2011 3.80 123.75 56.04 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/21/2011 3.80 123.75 56.06 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/22/2011 3.80 123.75 56.09 32.18 30.01 0.00
16 of 31
Table 2B Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 750
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
5/23/2011 3.80 123.75 56.11 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/24/2011 3.80 123.75 56.13 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/25/2011 3.80 123.75 56.16 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/26/2011 3.80 123.75 56.18 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/27/2011 3.80 123.75 56.20 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/28/2011 3.80 123.75 56.23 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/29/2011 3.80 123.75 56.25 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/30/2011 3.80 123.75 56.27 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/31/2011 3.80 123.75 56.30 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/1/2011 5.28 123.75 77.63 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/2/2011 5.28 123.75 77.66 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/3/2011 5.28 123.75 77.69 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/4/2011 5.28 123.75 77.71 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/5/2011 5.28 123.75 77.74 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/6/2011 5.28 123.75 77.77 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/7/2011 5.28 123.75 77.80 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/8/2011 5.28 123.75 77.83 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/9/2011 5.28 123.75 77.85 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/10/2011 5.28 123.75 77.88 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/11/2011 5.28 123.75 77.91 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/12/2011 5.28 123.75 77.94 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/13/2011 5.28 123.75 77.96 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/14/2011 5.28 123.75 77.99 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/15/2011 5.28 123.75 78.02 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/16/2011 5.28 123.75 78.05 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/17/2011 5.28 123.75 78.08 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/18/2011 5.28 123.75 78.10 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/19/2011 5.28 123.75 78.13 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/20/2011 5.28 123.75 78.16 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/21/2011 5.28 123.75 78.19 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/22/2011 5.28 123.75 78.21 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/23/2011 5.28 123.75 78.24 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/24/2011 5.28 123.75 78.27 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/25/2011 5.28 123.75 78.30 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/26/2011 5.28 123.75 78.33 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/27/2011 5.28 123.75 78.35 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/28/2011 5.28 123.75 78.38 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/29/2011 5.28 123.75 78.41 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/30/2011 5.28 123.75 78.44 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/1/2011 6.98 123.75 120.00 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/2/2011 6.98 123.75 120.03 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/3/2011 6.98 123.75 120.06 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/4/2011 6.98 123.75 120.09 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/5/2011 6.98 123.75 120.12 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/6/2011 6.98 123.75 120.15 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/7/2011 6.98 123.75 120.18 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/8/2011 6.98 123.75 120.21 32.18 30.01 0.00
17 of 31
Table 2B Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 750
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
7/9/2011 6.98 123.75 120.24 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/10/2011 6.98 123.75 120.27 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/11/2011 6.98 123.75 120.30 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/12/2011 6.98 123.75 120.33 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/13/2011 6.98 123.75 120.35 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/14/2011 6.98 123.75 120.38 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/15/2011 6.98 123.75 120.41 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/16/2011 6.98 123.75 120.43 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/17/2011 6.98 123.75 120.45 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/18/2011 6.98 123.75 120.47 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/19/2011 6.98 123.75 120.50 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/20/2011 6.98 123.75 120.52 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/21/2011 6.98 123.75 120.54 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/22/2011 6.98 123.75 120.56 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/23/2011 6.98 123.75 120.58 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/24/2011 6.98 123.75 120.60 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/25/2011 6.98 123.75 120.62 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/26/2011 6.98 123.75 120.64 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/27/2011 6.98 123.75 120.66 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/28/2011 6.98 123.75 120.68 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/29/2011 6.98 123.75 120.70 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/30/2011 6.98 123.75 120.72 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/31/2011 6.98 123.75 120.74 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/1/2011 23.68 123.75 148.63 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/2/2011 23.68 123.75 148.65 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/3/2011 23.68 123.75 148.68 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/4/2011 23.68 123.75 148.70 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/5/2011 23.68 123.75 148.73 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/6/2011 23.68 123.75 148.76 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/7/2011 23.68 123.75 148.78 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/8/2011 23.68 123.75 148.81 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/9/2011 23.68 123.75 148.83 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/10/2011 23.68 123.75 148.86 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/11/2011 23.68 123.75 148.88 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/12/2011 23.68 123.75 148.91 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/13/2011 23.68 123.75 148.93 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/14/2011 23.68 123.75 148.96 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/15/2011 23.68 123.75 148.99 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/16/2011 23.68 123.75 149.01 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/17/2011 23.68 123.75 149.04 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/18/2011 23.68 123.75 149.06 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/19/2011 23.68 123.75 149.09 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/20/2011 23.68 123.75 149.11 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/21/2011 23.68 123.75 149.14 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/22/2011 23.68 123.75 149.16 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/23/2011 23.68 123.75 149.19 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/24/2011 23.68 123.75 149.21 32.18 30.01 0.00
18 of 31
Table 2B Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 750
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
8/25/2011 23.68 123.75 149.24 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/26/2011 23.68 123.75 149.26 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/27/2011 23.68 123.75 149.29 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/28/2011 23.68 123.75 149.32 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/29/2011 23.68 123.75 149.34 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/30/2011 23.68 123.75 149.37 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/31/2011 23.68 123.75 149.39 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/1/2011 24.52 123.75 149.42 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/2/2011 24.52 123.75 149.44 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/3/2011 24.52 123.75 149.47 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/4/2011 24.52 123.75 149.49 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/5/2011 24.52 123.75 149.52 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/6/2011 24.52 123.75 149.55 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/7/2011 24.52 123.75 149.57 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/8/2011 24.52 123.75 149.60 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/9/2011 24.52 123.75 149.62 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/10/2011 24.52 123.75 149.65 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/11/2011 24.52 123.75 149.67 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/12/2011 24.52 123.75 149.70 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/13/2011 24.52 123.75 149.73 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/14/2011 24.52 123.75 149.75 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/15/2011 24.52 123.75 149.78 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/16/2011 24.52 123.75 149.80 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/17/2011 24.52 123.75 149.83 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/18/2011 24.52 123.75 149.85 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/19/2011 24.52 123.75 149.88 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/20/2011 24.52 123.75 149.90 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/21/2011 24.52 123.75 149.93 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/22/2011 24.52 123.75 149.96 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/23/2011 24.52 123.75 149.98 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/24/2011 24.52 123.75 150.01 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/25/2011 24.52 123.75 150.03 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/26/2011 24.52 123.75 150.06 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/27/2011 24.52 123.75 150.08 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/28/2011 24.52 123.75 150.11 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/29/2011 24.52 123.75 150.13 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/30/2011 24.52 123.75 150.16 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/1/2011 20.72 123.75 126.72 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/2/2011 20.72 123.75 126.75 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/3/2011 20.72 123.75 126.77 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/4/2011 20.72 123.75 126.80 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/5/2011 20.72 123.75 126.82 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/6/2011 20.72 123.75 126.85 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/7/2011 20.72 123.75 126.87 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/8/2011 20.72 123.75 126.90 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/9/2011 20.72 123.75 126.92 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/10/2011 20.72 123.75 126.95 32.18 30.01 0.00
19 of 31
Table 2B Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 750
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
10/11/2011 20.72 123.75 126.98 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/12/2011 20.72 123.75 127.00 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/13/2011 20.72 123.75 127.03 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/14/2011 20.72 123.75 127.05 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/15/2011 20.72 123.75 127.08 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/16/2011 20.72 123.75 127.10 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/17/2011 20.72 123.75 127.13 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/18/2011 20.72 123.75 127.16 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/19/2011 20.72 123.75 127.18 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/20/2011 20.72 123.75 127.21 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/21/2011 20.72 123.75 127.23 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/22/2011 20.72 123.75 127.26 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/23/2011 20.72 123.75 127.28 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/24/2011 20.72 123.75 127.31 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/25/2011 20.72 123.75 127.33 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/26/2011 20.72 123.75 127.36 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/27/2011 20.72 123.75 127.39 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/28/2011 20.72 123.75 127.41 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/29/2011 20.72 123.75 127.44 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/30/2011 20.72 123.75 127.46 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/31/2011 20.72 123.75 127.49 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/1/2011 12.90 123.75 88.16 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/2/2011 12.90 123.75 88.18 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/3/2011 12.90 123.75 88.20 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/4/2011 12.90 123.75 88.22 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/5/2011 12.90 123.75 88.24 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/6/2011 12.90 123.75 88.27 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/7/2011 12.90 123.75 88.29 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/8/2011 12.90 123.75 88.31 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/9/2011 12.90 123.75 88.33 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/10/2011 12.90 123.75 88.35 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/11/2011 12.90 123.75 88.37 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/12/2011 12.90 123.75 88.39 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/13/2011 12.90 123.75 88.41 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/14/2011 12.90 123.75 88.44 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/15/2011 12.90 123.75 88.46 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/16/2011 12.90 123.75 88.48 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/17/2011 12.90 123.75 88.50 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/18/2011 12.90 123.75 88.52 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/19/2011 12.90 123.75 88.54 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/20/2011 12.90 123.75 88.56 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/21/2011 12.90 123.75 88.59 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/22/2011 12.90 123.75 88.61 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/23/2011 12.90 123.75 88.63 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/24/2011 12.90 123.75 88.65 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/25/2011 12.90 123.75 88.67 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/26/2011 12.90 123.75 88.69 32.18 30.01 0.00
20 of 31
Table 2B Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 750
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
11/27/2011 12.90 123.75 88.71 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/28/2011 12.90 123.75 88.74 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/29/2011 12.90 123.75 88.76 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/30/2011 12.90 123.75 88.78 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/1/2011 7.82 123.75 58.67 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/2/2011 7.82 123.75 58.69 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/3/2011 7.82 123.75 58.70 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/4/2011 7.82 123.75 58.72 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/5/2011 7.82 123.75 58.74 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/6/2011 7.82 123.75 58.75 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/7/2011 7.82 123.75 58.77 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/8/2011 7.82 123.75 58.79 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/9/2011 7.82 123.75 58.80 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/10/2011 7.82 123.75 58.82 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/11/2011 7.82 123.75 58.84 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/12/2011 7.82 123.75 58.85 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/13/2011 7.82 123.75 58.87 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/14/2011 7.82 123.75 58.89 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/15/2011 7.82 123.75 58.90 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/16/2011 7.82 123.75 58.92 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/17/2011 7.82 123.75 58.94 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/18/2011 7.82 123.75 58.95 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/19/2011 7.82 123.75 58.97 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/20/2011 7.82 123.75 58.99 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/21/2011 7.82 123.75 59.00 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/22/2011 7.82 123.75 59.02 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/23/2011 7.82 123.75 59.04 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/24/2011 7.82 123.75 59.05 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/25/2011 7.82 123.75 59.07 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/26/2011 7.82 123.75 59.09 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/27/2011 7.82 123.75 59.10 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/28/2011 7.82 123.75 59.12 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/29/2011 7.82 123.75 59.14 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/30/2011 7.82 123.75 59.15 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/31/2011 7.82 123.75 59.17 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/1/2012 9.94 123.75 49.59 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/2/2012 9.94 123.75 49.60 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/3/2012 9.94 123.75 49.62 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/4/2012 9.94 123.75 49.63 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/5/2012 9.94 123.75 49.65 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/6/2012 9.94 123.75 49.66 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/7/2012 9.94 123.75 49.68 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/8/2012 9.94 123.75 49.69 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/9/2012 9.94 123.75 49.71 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/10/2012 9.94 123.75 49.72 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/11/2012 9.94 123.75 49.74 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/12/2012 9.94 123.75 49.75 32.18 30.01 0.00
21 of 31
Table 2B Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 750
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
1/13/2012 9.94 123.75 49.77 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/14/2012 9.94 123.75 49.78 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/15/2012 9.94 123.75 49.80 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/16/2012 9.94 123.75 49.81 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/17/2012 9.94 123.75 49.83 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/18/2012 9.94 123.75 49.84 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/19/2012 9.94 123.75 49.86 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/20/2012 9.94 123.75 49.87 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/21/2012 9.94 123.75 49.89 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/22/2012 9.94 123.75 49.90 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/23/2012 9.94 123.75 49.92 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/24/2012 9.94 123.75 49.93 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/25/2012 9.94 123.75 49.95 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/26/2012 9.94 123.75 49.96 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/27/2012 9.94 123.75 49.98 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/28/2012 9.94 123.75 49.99 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/29/2012 9.94 123.75 50.01 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/30/2012 9.94 123.75 50.02 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/31/2012 9.94 123.75 50.04 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/1/2012 8.88 123.75 46.82 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/2/2012 8.88 123.75 46.84 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/3/2012 8.88 123.75 46.85 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/4/2012 8.88 123.75 46.87 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/5/2012 8.88 123.75 46.88 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/6/2012 8.88 123.75 46.89 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/7/2012 8.88 123.75 46.91 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/8/2012 8.88 123.75 46.92 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/9/2012 8.88 123.75 46.94 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/10/2012 8.88 123.75 46.95 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/11/2012 8.88 123.75 46.96 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/12/2012 8.88 123.75 46.98 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/13/2012 8.88 123.75 46.99 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/14/2012 8.88 123.75 47.01 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/15/2012 8.88 123.75 47.02 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/16/2012 8.88 123.75 47.04 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/17/2012 8.88 123.75 47.05 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/18/2012 8.88 123.75 47.06 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/19/2012 8.88 123.75 47.08 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/20/2012 8.88 123.75 47.09 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/21/2012 8.88 123.75 47.11 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/22/2012 8.88 123.75 47.12 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/23/2012 8.88 123.75 47.13 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/24/2012 8.88 123.75 47.15 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/25/2012 8.88 123.75 47.16 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/26/2012 8.88 123.75 47.18 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/27/2012 8.88 123.75 47.19 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/28/2012 8.88 123.75 47.21 32.18 30.01 0.00
22 of 31
Table 2B Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 750
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
2/29/2012 8.88 123.75 47.22 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/1/2012 15.85 123.75 50.49 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/2/2012 15.85 123.75 50.51 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/3/2012 15.85 123.75 50.52 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/4/2012 15.85 123.75 50.54 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/5/2012 15.85 123.75 50.55 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/6/2012 15.85 123.75 50.57 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/7/2012 15.85 123.75 50.58 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/8/2012 15.85 123.75 50.60 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/9/2012 15.85 123.75 50.62 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/10/2012 15.85 123.75 50.63 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/11/2012 15.85 123.75 50.65 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/12/2012 15.85 123.75 50.66 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/13/2012 15.85 123.75 50.68 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/14/2012 15.85 123.75 50.69 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/15/2012 15.85 123.75 50.71 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/16/2012 15.85 123.75 50.73 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/17/2012 15.85 123.75 50.74 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/18/2012 15.85 123.75 50.76 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/19/2012 15.85 123.75 50.77 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/20/2012 15.85 123.75 50.79 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/21/2012 15.85 123.75 50.80 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/22/2012 15.85 123.75 50.82 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/23/2012 15.85 123.75 50.84 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/24/2012 15.85 123.75 50.85 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/25/2012 15.85 123.75 50.87 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/26/2012 15.85 123.75 50.88 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/27/2012 15.85 123.75 50.90 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/28/2012 15.85 123.75 50.91 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/29/2012 15.85 123.75 50.93 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/30/2012 15.85 123.75 50.94 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/31/2012 15.85 123.75 50.96 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/1/2012 2.11 123.75 52.62 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/2/2012 2.11 123.75 52.63 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/3/2012 2.11 123.75 52.65 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/4/2012 2.11 123.75 52.66 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/5/2012 2.11 123.75 52.68 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/6/2012 2.11 123.75 52.69 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/7/2012 2.11 123.75 52.71 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/8/2012 2.11 123.75 52.72 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/9/2012 2.11 123.75 52.73 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/10/2012 2.11 123.75 52.75 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/11/2012 2.11 123.75 52.76 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/12/2012 2.11 123.75 52.78 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/13/2012 2.11 123.75 52.79 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/14/2012 2.11 123.75 52.81 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/15/2012 2.11 123.75 52.82 32.18 30.01 0.00
23 of 31
Table 2B Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 750
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
4/16/2012 2.11 123.75 52.83 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/17/2012 2.11 123.75 52.85 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/18/2012 2.11 123.75 52.86 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/19/2012 2.11 123.75 52.88 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/20/2012 2.11 123.75 52.89 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/21/2012 2.11 123.75 52.91 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/22/2012 2.11 123.75 52.92 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/23/2012 2.11 123.75 52.93 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/24/2012 2.11 123.75 52.95 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/25/2012 2.11 123.75 52.96 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/26/2012 2.11 123.75 52.98 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/27/2012 2.11 123.75 52.99 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/28/2012 2.11 123.75 53.01 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/29/2012 2.11 123.75 53.02 32.18 30.01 0.00
4/30/2012 2.11 123.75 53.03 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/1/2012 3.80 123.75 61.34 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/2/2012 3.80 123.75 61.35 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/3/2012 3.80 123.75 61.37 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/4/2012 3.80 123.75 61.38 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/5/2012 3.80 123.75 61.40 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/6/2012 3.80 123.75 61.42 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/7/2012 3.80 123.75 61.43 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/8/2012 3.80 123.75 61.45 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/9/2012 3.80 123.75 61.46 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/10/2012 3.80 123.75 61.48 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/11/2012 3.80 123.75 61.49 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/12/2012 3.80 123.75 61.51 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/13/2012 3.80 123.75 61.53 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/14/2012 3.80 123.75 61.54 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/15/2012 3.80 123.75 61.56 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/16/2012 3.80 123.75 61.57 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/17/2012 3.80 123.75 61.59 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/18/2012 3.80 123.75 61.61 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/19/2012 3.80 123.75 61.62 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/20/2012 3.80 123.75 61.64 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/21/2012 3.80 123.75 61.65 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/22/2012 3.80 123.75 61.67 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/23/2012 3.80 123.75 61.68 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/24/2012 3.80 123.75 61.70 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/25/2012 3.80 123.75 61.72 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/26/2012 3.80 123.75 61.73 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/27/2012 3.80 123.75 61.75 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/28/2012 3.80 123.75 61.76 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/29/2012 3.80 123.75 61.78 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/30/2012 3.80 123.75 61.79 32.18 30.01 0.00
5/31/2012 3.80 123.75 61.81 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/1/2012 5.28 123.75 85.22 32.18 30.01 0.00
24 of 31
Table 2B Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 750
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
6/2/2012 5.28 123.75 85.24 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/3/2012 5.28 123.75 85.26 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/4/2012 5.28 123.75 85.27 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/5/2012 5.28 123.75 85.29 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/6/2012 5.28 123.75 85.31 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/7/2012 5.28 123.75 85.33 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/8/2012 5.28 123.75 85.35 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/9/2012 5.28 123.75 85.37 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/10/2012 5.28 123.75 85.38 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/11/2012 5.28 123.75 85.40 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/12/2012 5.28 123.75 85.42 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/13/2012 5.28 123.75 85.44 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/14/2012 5.28 123.75 85.46 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/15/2012 5.28 123.75 85.48 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/16/2012 5.28 123.75 85.49 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/17/2012 5.28 123.75 85.51 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/18/2012 5.28 123.75 85.53 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/19/2012 5.28 123.75 85.55 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/20/2012 5.28 123.75 85.57 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/21/2012 5.28 123.75 85.59 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/22/2012 5.28 123.75 85.60 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/23/2012 5.28 123.75 85.62 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/24/2012 5.28 123.75 85.64 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/25/2012 5.28 123.75 85.66 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/26/2012 5.28 123.75 85.68 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/27/2012 5.28 123.75 85.70 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/28/2012 5.28 123.75 85.71 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/29/2012 5.28 123.75 85.73 32.18 30.01 0.00
6/30/2012 5.28 123.75 85.75 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/1/2012 6.98 123.75 131.18 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/2/2012 6.98 123.75 131.19 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/3/2012 6.98 123.75 131.21 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/4/2012 6.98 123.75 131.23 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/5/2012 6.98 123.75 131.25 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/6/2012 6.98 123.75 131.27 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/7/2012 6.98 123.75 131.28 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/8/2012 6.98 123.75 131.30 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/9/2012 6.98 123.75 131.32 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/10/2012 6.98 123.75 131.34 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/11/2012 6.98 123.75 131.36 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/12/2012 6.98 123.75 131.37 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/13/2012 6.98 123.75 131.39 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/14/2012 6.98 123.75 131.41 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/15/2012 6.98 123.75 131.43 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/16/2012 6.98 123.75 131.44 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/17/2012 6.98 123.75 131.46 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/18/2012 6.98 123.75 131.48 32.18 30.01 0.00
25 of 31
Table 2B Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 750
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
7/19/2012 6.98 123.75 131.50 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/20/2012 6.98 123.75 131.52 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/21/2012 6.98 123.75 131.53 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/22/2012 6.98 123.75 131.55 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/23/2012 6.98 123.75 131.57 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/24/2012 6.98 123.75 131.59 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/25/2012 6.98 123.75 131.61 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/26/2012 6.98 123.75 131.62 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/27/2012 6.98 123.75 131.64 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/28/2012 6.98 123.75 131.66 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/29/2012 6.98 123.75 131.68 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/30/2012 6.98 123.75 131.69 32.18 30.01 0.00
7/31/2012 6.98 123.75 131.71 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/1/2012 23.68 123.75 162.13 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/2/2012 23.68 123.75 162.15 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/3/2012 23.68 123.75 162.17 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/4/2012 23.68 123.75 162.19 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/5/2012 23.68 123.75 162.22 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/6/2012 23.68 123.75 162.24 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/7/2012 23.68 123.75 162.26 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/8/2012 23.68 123.75 162.28 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/9/2012 23.68 123.75 162.30 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/10/2012 23.68 123.75 162.32 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/11/2012 23.68 123.75 162.35 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/12/2012 23.68 123.75 162.37 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/13/2012 23.68 123.75 162.39 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/14/2012 23.68 123.75 162.41 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/15/2012 23.68 123.75 162.43 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/16/2012 23.68 123.75 162.45 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/17/2012 23.68 123.75 162.48 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/18/2012 23.68 123.75 162.50 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/19/2012 23.68 123.75 162.52 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/20/2012 23.68 123.75 162.54 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/21/2012 23.68 123.75 162.56 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/22/2012 23.68 123.75 162.58 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/23/2012 23.68 123.75 162.61 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/24/2012 23.68 123.75 162.63 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/25/2012 23.68 123.75 162.65 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/26/2012 23.68 123.75 162.67 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/27/2012 23.68 123.75 162.69 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/28/2012 23.68 123.75 162.71 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/29/2012 23.68 123.75 162.74 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/30/2012 23.68 123.75 162.76 32.18 30.01 0.00
8/31/2012 23.68 123.75 162.78 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/1/2012 24.52 123.75 162.80 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/2/2012 24.52 123.75 162.82 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/3/2012 24.52 123.75 162.84 32.18 30.01 0.00
26 of 31
Table 2B Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 750
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
9/4/2012 24.52 123.75 162.87 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/5/2012 24.52 123.75 162.89 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/6/2012 24.52 123.75 162.91 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/7/2012 24.52 123.75 162.93 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/8/2012 24.52 123.75 162.95 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/9/2012 24.52 123.75 162.98 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/10/2012 24.52 123.75 163.00 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/11/2012 24.52 123.75 163.02 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/12/2012 24.52 123.75 163.04 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/13/2012 24.52 123.75 163.06 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/14/2012 24.52 123.75 163.08 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/15/2012 24.52 123.75 163.11 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/16/2012 24.52 123.75 163.13 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/17/2012 24.52 123.75 163.15 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/18/2012 24.52 123.75 163.17 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/19/2012 24.52 123.75 163.19 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/20/2012 24.52 123.75 163.22 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/21/2012 24.52 123.75 163.24 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/22/2012 24.52 123.75 163.26 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/23/2012 24.52 123.75 163.28 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/24/2012 24.52 123.75 163.30 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/25/2012 24.52 123.75 163.32 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/26/2012 24.52 123.75 163.35 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/27/2012 24.52 123.75 163.37 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/28/2012 24.52 123.75 163.39 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/29/2012 24.52 123.75 163.41 32.18 30.01 0.00
9/30/2012 24.52 123.75 163.43 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/1/2012 20.72 123.75 137.92 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/2/2012 20.72 123.75 137.94 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/3/2012 20.72 123.75 137.96 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/4/2012 20.72 123.75 137.98 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/5/2012 20.72 123.75 138.01 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/6/2012 20.72 123.75 138.03 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/7/2012 20.72 123.75 138.05 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/8/2012 20.72 123.75 138.08 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/9/2012 20.72 123.75 138.10 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/10/2012 20.72 123.75 138.12 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/11/2012 20.72 123.75 138.15 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/12/2012 20.72 123.75 138.17 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/13/2012 20.72 123.75 138.19 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/14/2012 20.72 123.75 138.21 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/15/2012 20.72 123.75 138.24 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/16/2012 20.72 123.75 138.26 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/17/2012 20.72 123.75 138.28 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/18/2012 20.72 123.75 138.31 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/19/2012 20.72 123.75 138.33 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/20/2012 20.72 123.75 138.35 32.18 30.01 0.00
27 of 31
Table 2B Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 750
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
10/21/2012 20.72 123.75 138.37 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/22/2012 20.72 123.75 138.40 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/23/2012 20.72 123.75 138.42 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/24/2012 20.72 123.75 138.44 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/25/2012 20.72 123.75 138.47 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/26/2012 20.72 123.75 138.49 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/27/2012 20.72 123.75 138.51 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/28/2012 20.72 123.75 138.54 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/29/2012 20.72 123.75 138.56 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/30/2012 20.72 123.75 138.58 32.18 30.01 0.00
10/31/2012 20.72 123.75 138.60 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/1/2012 12.90 123.75 95.84 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/2/2012 12.90 123.75 95.86 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/3/2012 12.90 123.75 95.88 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/4/2012 12.90 123.75 95.90 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/5/2012 12.90 123.75 95.92 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/6/2012 12.90 123.75 95.94 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/7/2012 12.90 123.75 95.96 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/8/2012 12.90 123.75 95.98 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/9/2012 12.90 123.75 96.00 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/10/2012 12.90 123.75 96.02 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/11/2012 12.90 123.75 96.04 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/12/2012 12.90 123.75 96.06 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/13/2012 12.90 123.75 96.08 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/14/2012 12.90 123.75 96.10 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/15/2012 12.90 123.75 96.12 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/16/2012 12.90 123.75 96.14 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/17/2012 12.90 123.75 96.16 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/18/2012 12.90 123.75 96.18 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/19/2012 12.90 123.75 96.20 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/20/2012 12.90 123.75 96.22 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/21/2012 12.90 123.75 96.24 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/22/2012 12.90 123.75 96.26 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/23/2012 12.90 123.75 96.28 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/24/2012 12.90 123.75 96.30 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/25/2012 12.90 123.75 96.32 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/26/2012 12.90 123.75 96.34 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/27/2012 12.90 123.75 96.36 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/28/2012 12.90 123.75 96.38 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/29/2012 12.90 123.75 96.39 32.18 30.01 0.00
11/30/2012 12.90 123.75 96.41 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/1/2012 7.82 123.75 63.71 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/2/2012 7.82 123.75 63.72 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/3/2012 7.82 123.75 63.73 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/4/2012 7.82 123.75 63.75 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/5/2012 7.82 123.75 63.76 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/6/2012 7.82 123.75 63.77 32.18 30.01 0.00
28 of 31
Table 2B Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 750
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
12/7/2012 7.82 123.75 63.78 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/8/2012 7.82 123.75 63.79 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/9/2012 7.82 123.75 63.81 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/10/2012 7.82 123.75 63.82 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/11/2012 7.82 123.75 63.83 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/12/2012 7.82 123.75 63.84 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/13/2012 7.82 123.75 63.86 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/14/2012 7.82 123.75 63.87 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/15/2012 7.82 123.75 63.88 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/16/2012 7.82 123.75 63.89 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/17/2012 7.82 123.75 63.91 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/18/2012 7.82 123.75 63.92 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/19/2012 7.82 123.75 63.93 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/20/2012 7.82 123.75 63.94 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/21/2012 7.82 123.75 63.96 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/22/2012 7.82 123.75 63.97 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/23/2012 7.82 123.75 63.98 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/24/2012 7.82 123.75 63.99 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/25/2012 7.82 123.75 64.01 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/26/2012 7.82 123.75 64.02 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/27/2012 7.82 123.75 64.03 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/28/2012 7.82 123.75 64.04 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/29/2012 7.82 123.75 64.06 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/30/2012 7.82 123.75 64.07 32.18 30.01 0.00
12/31/2012 7.82 123.75 64.08 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/1/2013 9.94 123.75 53.70 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/2/2013 9.94 123.75 53.71 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/3/2013 9.94 123.75 53.72 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/4/2013 9.94 123.75 53.73 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/5/2013 9.94 123.75 53.74 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/6/2013 9.94 123.75 53.76 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/7/2013 9.94 123.75 53.77 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/8/2013 9.94 123.75 53.78 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/9/2013 9.94 123.75 53.79 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/10/2013 9.94 123.75 53.80 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/11/2013 9.94 123.75 53.81 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/12/2013 9.94 123.75 53.82 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/13/2013 9.94 123.75 53.84 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/14/2013 9.94 123.75 53.85 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/15/2013 9.94 123.75 53.86 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/16/2013 9.94 123.75 53.87 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/17/2013 9.94 123.75 53.88 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/18/2013 9.94 123.75 53.89 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/19/2013 9.94 123.75 53.90 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/20/2013 9.94 123.75 53.91 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/21/2013 9.94 123.75 53.93 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/22/2013 9.94 123.75 53.94 32.18 30.01 0.00
29 of 31
Table 2B Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 750
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
1/23/2013 9.94 123.75 53.95 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/24/2013 9.94 123.75 53.96 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/25/2013 9.94 123.75 53.97 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/26/2013 9.94 123.75 53.98 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/27/2013 9.94 123.75 53.99 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/28/2013 9.94 123.75 54.00 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/29/2013 9.94 123.75 54.02 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/30/2013 9.94 123.75 54.03 32.18 30.01 0.00
1/31/2013 9.94 123.75 54.04 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/1/2013 8.88 123.75 50.56 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/2/2013 8.88 123.75 50.57 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/3/2013 8.88 123.75 50.58 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/4/2013 8.88 123.75 50.59 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/5/2013 8.88 123.75 50.61 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/6/2013 8.88 123.75 50.62 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/7/2013 8.88 123.75 50.63 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/8/2013 8.88 123.75 50.64 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/9/2013 8.88 123.75 50.65 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/10/2013 8.88 123.75 50.66 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/11/2013 8.88 123.75 50.67 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/12/2013 8.88 123.75 50.68 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/13/2013 8.88 123.75 50.69 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/14/2013 8.88 123.75 50.70 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/15/2013 8.88 123.75 50.71 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/16/2013 8.88 123.75 50.72 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/17/2013 8.88 123.75 50.73 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/18/2013 8.88 123.75 50.74 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/19/2013 8.88 123.75 50.76 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/20/2013 8.88 123.75 50.77 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/21/2013 8.88 123.75 50.78 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/22/2013 8.88 123.75 50.79 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/23/2013 8.88 123.75 50.80 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/24/2013 8.88 123.75 50.81 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/25/2013 8.88 123.75 50.82 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/26/2013 8.88 123.75 50.83 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/27/2013 8.88 123.75 50.84 32.18 30.01 0.00
2/28/2013 8.88 123.75 50.85 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/1/2013 15.85 123.75 54.37 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/2/2013 15.85 123.75 54.38 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/3/2013 15.85 123.75 54.39 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/4/2013 15.85 123.75 54.41 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/5/2013 15.85 123.75 54.42 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/6/2013 15.85 123.75 54.43 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/7/2013 15.85 123.75 54.44 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/8/2013 15.85 123.75 54.45 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/9/2013 15.85 123.75 54.46 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/10/2013 15.85 123.75 54.48 32.18 30.01 0.00
30 of 31
Table 2B Inflow and Outflow Rates for the South Cell for an Ore Production Rate of 750
tons/day
Date
Precip
[gal/min]
Tailings Water
Flowrate
[gal/min]
Evaporation
[gal/min]
Entrained
Water
[gal/min]
Tailings Solids
Flowrate [ton/hr]
Contaminated
Soils [ton/hr]
3/11/2013 15.85 123.75 54.49 32.18 30.01 0.00
3/12/2013 15.85 123.75 54.50 32.18 30.01 0.00
31 of 31

APPENDIX F.3.2
PROCESS PONDS

Appendix F.3.2 Shootaring Canyon Process Ponds Water Balance
South Process Pond North Process Pond North Process Pond North Process Pond South Process Pond South Process Pond
Elapsed time (yr)Volume [ft^3]Volume [ft^3] Water Elevation (ft)Remaining Freeboard (ft)Water Elevation (ft)Remaining Freeboard (ft)
0.00 0 0 4474.00 14.00 4465.00 20.00
0.08 63871 63726 4476.18 11.82 4467.51 17.49
0.17 114290 110814 4476.81 11.19 4468.44 16.56
0.25 158349 150961 4477.26 10.74 4469.06 15.94
0.33 203993 190858 4477.67 10.33 4469.70 15.30
0.42 245191 226112 4478.03 9.97 4470.23 14.77
0.50 283579 256933 4478.32 9.68 4470.69 14.31
0.58 307943 271272 4478.45 9.55 4470.99 14.01
0.67 318049 266012 4478.40 9.60 4471.11 13.89
0.75 317004 246585 4478.22 9.78 4471.10 13.90
0.83 315444 227733 4478.04 9.96 4471.08 13.92
0.92 325015 222720 4478.00 10.00 4471.19 13.81
1.00 348663 236926 4478.13 9.87 4471.48 13.52
1.08 385829 267874 4478.42 9.58 4471.92 13.08
1.17 426887 303906 4478.75 9.25 4472.38 12.62
1.25 464688 337572 4479.07 8.93 4472.79 12.21
1.33 505579 373691 4479.39 8.61 4473.24 11.76
1.42 542896 406309 4479.68 8.32 4473.65 11.35
1.50 577175 435071 4479.94 8.06 4474.03 10.97
1.58 596170 446695 4480.05 7.95 4474.22 10.78
1.67 598003 437209 4479.96 8.04 4474.24 10.76
1.75 587086 412705 4479.74 8.26 4474.13 10.87
1.83 576287 389088 4479.53 8.47 4474.02 10.98
1.92 578057 380042 4479.45 8.55 4474.04 10.96
2.00 596652 391598 4479.55 8.45 4474.23 10.77
2.08 630464 420780 4479.82 8.18 4474.57 10.43
2.17 668788 455348 4480.12 7.88 4474.96 10.04
2.25 704326 487789 4480.40 7.60 4475.31 9.69
2.33 742583 522476 4480.70 7.30 4475.70 9.30
2.42 777316 553683 4480.98 7.02 4476.05 8.95
2.50 808569 580783 4481.20 6.80 4476.34 8.66
2.58 823629 590230 4481.28 6.72 4476.48 8.52
2.67 819367 577363 4481.18 6.82 4476.44 8.56
2.75 801146 548786 4480.93 7.07 4476.27 8.73
2.83 783488 521317 4480.69 7.31 4476.11 8.89
2.92 779449 508996 4480.59 7.41 4476.07 8.93
3.00 794263 518411 4480.67 7.33 4476.21 8.79
3.08 825550 546158 4480.91 7.09 4476.50 8.50
3.17 861802 579543 4481.19 6.81 4476.84 8.16
3.25 895621 611000 4481.46 6.54 4477.15 7.85
3.33 931879 644538 4481.74 6.26 4477.49 7.51
3.42 964654 674614 4481.99 6.01 4477.80 7.20
3.50 993608 700382 4482.20 5.80 4478.06 6.94
1 of 3
Appendix F.3.2 Shootaring Canyon Process Ponds Water Balance
South Process Pond North Process Pond North Process Pond North Process Pond South Process Pond South Process Pond
Elapsed time (yr)Volume [ft^3]Volume [ft^3] Water Elevation (ft)Remaining Freeboard (ft)Water Elevation (ft)Remaining Freeboard (ft)
3.58 1005644 708084 4482.26 5.74 4478.17 6.83
3.67 996696 692503 4482.13 5.87 4478.09 6.91
3.75 972843 660650 4481.87 6.13 4477.87 7.13
3.83 949894 630085 4481.62 6.38 4477.66 7.34
3.92 941385 615126 4481.49 6.51 4477.58 7.42
4.00 953288 622814 4481.56 6.44 4477.69 7.31
4.08 982624 649404 4481.78 6.22 4477.97 7.03
4.17 1017260 681835 4482.05 5.95 4478.27 6.73
4.25 1050901 713591 4482.30 5.70 4478.56 6.44
4.33 1085591 746193 4482.56 5.44 4478.86 6.14
4.42 1116832 775351 4482.79 5.21 4479.13 5.87
4.50 1143988 800041 4482.99 5.01 4479.36 5.64
4.58 1153669 806320 4483.04 4.96 4479.45 5.55
4.67 1141057 788524 4482.90 5.10 4479.34 5.66
4.75 1112807 754006 4482.62 5.38 4479.09 5.91
4.83 1085715 720922 4482.36 5.64 4478.86 6.14
4.92 1073673 703804 4482.22 5.78 4478.76 6.24
5.00 1083267 710076 4482.27 5.73 4478.84 6.16
5.08 1111059 735715 4482.48 5.52 4479.08 5.92
5.17 1144430 767366 4482.73 5.27 4479.37 5.63
5.25 1175854 797379 4482.97 5.03 4479.64 5.36
5.33 1209315 829230 4483.22 4.78 4479.93 5.07
5.42 1239341 857644 4483.45 4.55 4480.17 4.83
5.50 1265069 881454 4483.64 4.36 4480.38 4.62
5.58 1272886 886572 4483.68 4.32 4480.44 4.56
5.67 1257382 866966 4483.52 4.48 4480.32 4.68
5.75 1225640 830271 4483.23 4.77 4480.06 4.94
5.83 1195233 795139 4482.95 5.05 4479.81 5.19
5.92 1180376 776283 4482.80 5.20 4479.68 5.32
6.00 1188135 781419 4482.84 5.16 4479.75 5.25
6.08 1214696 806295 4483.04 4.96 4479.98 5.02
6.17 1247048 837313 4483.29 4.71 4480.24 4.76
6.25 1277630 866797 4483.52 4.48 4480.48 4.52
6.33 1310115 898026 4483.77 4.23 4480.74 4.26
6.42 1339188 925824 4483.99 4.01 4480.98 4.02
6.50 1363794 948905 4484.16 3.84 4481.18 3.82
6.58 1370131 953071 4484.19 3.81 4481.23 3.77
6.67 1352323 931986 4484.04 3.96 4481.08 3.92
6.75 1317812 893492 4483.73 4.27 4480.81 4.19
6.83 1284803 856661 4483.44 4.56 4480.54 4.46
6.92 1267718 836365 4483.28 4.72 4480.40 4.60
7.00 1274011 840559 4483.31 4.69 4480.45 4.55
7.08 1299592 864803 4483.50 4.50 4480.66 4.34
2 of 3
Appendix F.3.2 Shootaring Canyon Process Ponds Water Balance
South Process Pond North Process Pond North Process Pond North Process Pond South Process Pond South Process Pond
Elapsed time (yr)Volume [ft^3]Volume [ft^3] Water Elevation (ft)Remaining Freeboard (ft)Water Elevation (ft)Remaining Freeboard (ft)
7.17 1331144 895297 4483.75 4.25 4480.91 4.09
7.25 1361056 924341 4483.98 4.02 4481.15 3.85
7.33 1392756 955054 4484.21 3.79 4481.41 3.59
7.42 1421052 982351 4484.41 3.59 4481.64 3.36
7.50 1444738 1004848 4484.58 3.42 4481.83 3.17
3 of 3

APPENDIX G
LINER SYSTEM DESIGN

APPENDIX G.1
LEACHATE COLLECTION AND LEAK DETECTION DESIGN
CALCULATIONS

Appendix G.1 1
APPENDIX G.1
Leachate Collection System and Leak Detection System Calculations

1.0 MEETING HEAD REQUIREMENTS ON PRIMARY LINER
During initial operations of the tailings storage facility (TSF), much of the gravel of the leachate
collection system will be exposed. During this time, fluid from tailings discharge, direct precipitation
falling on the TSF, and runoff from the mill area will flow directly into the drainage gravel and pond in
the lower portion of the cell. This critical time period will occur, to a lesser degree as time progresses,
until the drainage gravel is completely covered. Once the gravel is covered, fluid will pond on top of the
tailings, and infiltrate into the leachate collection system at a rate proportional to the hydraulic
conductivity of, and the hydraulic gradient through, the tailings.

During Tailings Discharge. The expected discharge rate from the mill to the TSF is approximately 176
gpm of slurry, at a solids content of 49 percent. The net result is approximately 127 gpm of fluid, and 49
gpm of solids (Lyntek, 2007). The proposed LCS consists of 4-in diameter perforated pipe placed on a
40-foot spacing within the lowest portions of the TSF floor, with the spacing increasing to a 80-foot
spacing elsewhere. The capacity of a pipe flowing full can be estimated using Manning’s equation as
follows:

2
1
3
249.1 SARnQ=

where Q = flow capacity,
n = Manning roughness coefficient, 0.01 for HDPE pipe,
A = area of flow, equal to area of pipe when flowing full,
R = hydraulic radius, equal to D/4 when flowing full,
D = inside diameter of pipe, and
S = slope.

The capacity of a 4-in diameter pipe placed at a minimum 1 percent grade is approximately 110 gpm.
Therefore, during initial discharge, the liquid portion of the slurry will flow across the upper surface of
the leachate collection system gravel. As it travels downgradient, it will percolate into the drainage
gravel. It will travel a maximum distance of 20 to 40 feet (depending on discharge location) before the
majority of the flow is intercepted by a perforated pipe and carried to the sump. The amount of flow
above the capacity of a single 4-inch pipe will continue to travel downgradient until it is intercepted by a
second pipe. Between any two pipes of the leachate collection system, there is adequate capacity to
convey the maximum expected flow of 127 gpm of fluid.

During Storm-Event Precipitation. Based on the attached drawing (Attachment 3-1), which shows
contours of the proposed storage cell topography showing top of compacted clay surface, and the attached
Attachment 3-2, which shows the rate of rise in the TSF, it will take between 3.4 and 5.2 years for the
tailings to completely cover the drainage material (reach elevation 4412 ft). The relation between return
period and probability of exceedance is given in the following equation:

)/(1 TnePE−−=

where PE = probability of exceedance during time period, n,
n = time period, and
T = return period, or average recurrence interval.

Appendix G.1 2
The probability of exceedance, or risk, was assumed to be 10%, which is a risk commonly used in
building codes. The time period evaluated was 5.2 years, or the time required to cover the drainage layer.
The associated return period is 49 years. Therefore, we used a 50-year storm as our design event for
calculating precipitation and runoff. The volume of water associated with a 50-year, 24-hr storm was
calculated using
()()[]TSFTSFmillmillACACDVolume×+×=

where D = depth of precipitation,
C = runoff coefficient, and
A = catchment area of drainage basin.

The precipitation depth of 2.12 inches was taken from NOAA (2006), as shown in Attachment 3-7 and 3-
8. The catchment area of the mill is 44.6 acres, and the catchment area of the south pond of the TSF is
34.1 acres. The runoff coefficient is conservatively assumed to be 0.9 for the mill area, and 1.0 for the
TSF. The resulting volume of water associated with a 50-year, 24-hour storm is 13.1 acre-ft (4,272,000
gallons). The recommended pumping system should be designed to draw down this water from an open
cell in 72 hours or less. The high-flow pump capacity necessary to accomplish removal of this volume of
water is approximately 990 gpm. A system that is designed to remove the accumulation of storm water
from this event, within 72 hours, should include temporary barge pumps that can be operated in the
ponded area. The pumps should be on-hand while the drainage layer is exposed.

During Normal Operations. The maximum head on the primary liner is controlled by the spacing
between pipes in the LCS. The pipe spacing is determined by the following equation as presented by
McWhorter and Sunada (1977, Eq. 4-78) (see Attachment 3-9 and 3-10).
()qkhhSpacingoPIPE×××−=42max2

where hmax = maximum allowable head on liner = 18 inches,
ho = head at pipe = 0 inches,
k = hydraulic conductivity of gravel bedding material = 3.0 x 10-2 cm/s, and
q = infiltration rate of leachate through tailings.

The hydraulic conductivity of the gravel bedding is estimated using typical values for clean, well-graded
gravel and sand mixture (Hunt, 1984) (see Attachment 3-11through 3-13) to be 3.0 x 10-2 cm/s.

Flow of leachate through the tailings, per unit area, is represented by the Darcy’s law:

kiq=

where k = hydraulic conductivity of tailings, and
i = hydraulic gradient through tailings.

The hydraulic conductivity of the tailings will likely exhibit large anisotropic behavior, with the sand
lenses within the tailings having a saturated conductivity orders of magnitude greater than through the
slimes. Keshian and Rager (1988) (see Attachment 3-14 and 3-15) present data for hydraulically placed
uranium tailings. Typical values for the hydraulic conductivity for tailings consisting of a combination of
sands and slimes are approximately 2 x 10-5 cm/s, and for predominately sandy tailings, the hydraulic
conductivity increases to approximately 1 x 10-4 cm/s for sands. Operations of the TSF will include

Appendix G.1 3
frequent rotation of spigotting location, such that slimes and sands should be interbedded throughout the
area extent of the cell. Therefore, it is estimated that the effective hydraulic conductivity of the cell can
be modeled predominately as a sand/slime combination (i.e. hydraulic conductivity of 2 x 10-5 cm/s). The
LCS also considers the possibility of zones of predominately sand tailings, as will be discussed later.

Expected hydraulic gradients through the tailings will depend on the amount of ponded water atop the
tailings. Attachment 3-16 presents expected tailings and fluid elevation in the TSF throughout operation
of the cell based on water balance modeling. As shown in the figure, gradients may be as high as 1.3
during initial operation. For determining capacity of the LCS, the hydraulic gradient is conservatively
assumed to be as high as 2.0. Therefore, flow rate (per unit area) of leachate flowing into the LCS is
estimated to be between 4.0 x 10-5 cm/s and 2.0 x 10-4 cm/s.

Based on the pipe spacing equation presented above, a pipe spacing of 80 feet is required to limit head to
18 inches assuming a mix of sand and slimes, and a spacing of 40 feet if vertical zones of predominately
sands are encountered. The design of the LCS, as shown in Drawing L2, incorporates a minimum pipe
spacing of 80 feet throughout the base of the cell, and includes a tighter spacing of 40 feet along the mid-
portion of the cell to incorporate potentially higher leachate flows.

2.0 CAPACITY OF LCS
All pipes within the LCS must accommodate the flow reporting to that pipe. The amount of flow is
equivalent to the unit area flow rate times the area of the cell reporting to the pipe. The capacity of the
pipe is calculated using Manning’s equation. It is also assumed that the pipes are flowing half-full. The
attached spreadsheets summarize the calculations and demonstrate that the capacity of the LCS is
sufficient to limit head on the primary liner to 18 inches.

3.0 ESTIMATE OF TIME REQUIRED TO DEWATER TAILINGS
The schematic below illustrates the concept used to estimate the time required to dewater the tailings
upon closure of the mill. It is assumed that free water can be pumped off the surface through barge
pumps. Therefore, at closure, the phreatic surface will be at or near the surface of the tailings. At the
base of the tailings, the tailings are free-draining because the drainage gravels and leachate collection
pipes have been designed to limit head on the primary geomembrane liner to 18 inches or less. Therefore,
water will drain through the tailings at Darcy’s seepage velocity as follows:

n
ikvs
×=

where k = hydraulic conductivity of tailings,
i = hydraulic gradient through tailings, and
n = effective porosity of tailings = 0.35

The hydraulic conductivity of the tailings will likely exhibit large anisotropic behavior, with the sand
lenses within the tailings having a saturated hydraulic conductivity orders of magnitude greater than the
hydraulic conductivity through the slimes. The effective hydraulic conductivity is assumed to be
approximately 2 x 10-5 cm/s for a combination of sands and slimes. The hydraulic gradient is equivalent
to 1, since dh/dl (change in head over the flow length) remains constant for vertical downward flow to a
free-flowing drain. Therefore, the seepage velocity is calculated to be 5.7 x 10-5 cm/s. For a maximum
tailings height of 58.7 feet (from elevation 4363 to 4421.7), the dewatering time is approximately one
year.

Appendix G.1 4

4.0 ACTION LEAKAGE RATES
Tailings Storage Facility. Giroud et al. (1997), Giroud and Bonapart (1989) and the U.S. EPA (1992)
discuss methods for estimating leakage through the primary liner for a properly installed and functioning
liner system. Although there is a minute rate of leakage through HDPE via permeation or diffusion, the
permeation rate is insignificant when contrasted with the leakage through small punctures or defects in
the installed liner. The leakage through a hole is estimated by the following equation (Giroud et al.
(1997), Eq. 20, see Attachment 3-19):

primhgaQ××××=26.0

where Q = leakage rate through defect (ft3/s),
a = defect area (ft2),
g = acceleration due to gravity, 32.2 ft/s2, and
hprim = head of leachate on top of primary liner (ft).

The hole diameter was assumed to be 0.079 in (2 mm), corresponding to a small geomembrane defect
(defect which may occasionally be undetected during construction) as described in Giroud et al. (1997),
and in EPA (1992). Although requirements specify head on the primary liner to be three feet or less, the
leachate collection system has been designed to contain leachate head within the drainage gravel, and is
therefore limited to 18 inches. The estimated flow rate through a defect is therefore 130 gal/day. If the
defect density is assumed to be 1 hole per acre, following recommendations given by EPA (1992), the
estimated flow through defects from the above calculation results in an ALR of 130 gal/day/acre.

The ALR of 130 gal/day/acre can be converted to a Sump Action Leakage Rate (SALR) by taking the
product of the ALR and the area contributing to the sump. There are a total of four sumps for south TSF
58.7 ft
maximum
2.0 ft
Tailings
6 inches of sand, 18
inches of gravel drain
material
Geomembrane
Geonet
Geomembrane

Appendix G.1 5
(SD1 through SD4) as shown in Drawing L4. Table G.1-1 presents the maximum leakage capture area for
each sump and the SALR for each sump.

Table G.1-1. Sump Action Leakage Rate for All Cells
SALR Sump Liner Area
(acre) (gal/day) (gal/min)
SD1 7.35 955 0.66
SD2 5.42 705 0.49
SD3 6.41 833 0.58
SD4 11.97 1556 1.08

Process Ponds. The ALR for the north and south process ponds were calculated using the same
procedures, hole diameter, and hole density as for the TSF. The ALR is highly dependant on the depth of
fluid in the process ponds. Because depth of fluid will vary throughout the life of the process ponds, ALR
are presented in graphical form in Figure G.1-1. The maximum ALR of the north process ponds is 10,230
gal/day (7.1 gal/min), and 12,770 gal/day (8.9 gal/min) for the south process pond.

Appendix G.1 6
Figure G.1-1 Action Leakage Rates for North and South Process Ponds

0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000
Action leakage rate (gal/day)
Fl
u
i
d

D
e
p
t
h

(
f
t
)
North Process
Pond
South Process
Pond
Maximum ALR = 12,770
gal/day
Maximum ALR = 10,230 gal/day

Appendix G.1 7
5.0 FLOW CAPACITY OF LEAK DETECTION SYSTEM
Flow capacity to prevent filling the geonet at point of defect. The maximum steady-state rate of leachate
migration through a single defect in the primary liner that the leak detection system can accommodate
without being filled with leachate at the point of the defect can be calculated using the following equation
by Giroud et al. (1997) (see equation 12 of Attachment 3-18):

2
LDLfulltkQQ×=≤

where k = hydraulic conductivity of geonet, and
tLDL = thickness of leak detection layer.

Fluid conveyance of geonets is typically expressed in terms of transmissivity, T, which is related to
hydraulic conductivity by the following expression:

LDLtkT×=

Combining the above equations, the maximum rate of leakage through a defect is expressed as:

LDLfulltTQ×=

Attachment 3-28 shows the variability of transmissivity of a geonet with overburden pressure and
gradient. The maximum overburden height, allowing for additional expansion of the TSF, may ultimately
be as high as 110 feet, including cover, with a moist density of 100 pcf, resulting in a maximum
overburden height of 11,000 psf. If flow is contained within the geonet drain, the gradient is equivalent to
the slope of the geonet, which varies from 0.04 to 0.06 along the floor of the TSF. As shown in
Attachment 3-28, the transmissivity of a 300 mil (7.62 mm) geonet is 4.4 x 10-3 m2/s. Therefore, Qfull is
3.4 x 10-5 m3/s.

Flow (or transmissivity) values obtained in a laboratory should be reduced to account for long-term
factors such as intrusion (RFIN), creep (RFCR), chemical clogging (RFCC), and biological clogging (RFBC),
as reflected in the following equation:

⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡
×××=
BCCCCRIN
fullallow RFRFRFRFQQ1

Appendix G.1 8
The following reduction factors were used in calculating the allowable flow in the geonet:

Reduction
Factor
Range as
presented in
Koerner
(1998)
(Attachment
3-28)
Range as
presented in
Bachus et al.
(2007)
(Attachment 3-21
through 3-24)
Value
used in
design Comment
RFIN 1.5-2.0 --- 1.0 No geotextile on either side of geonet, lab
data represents 100-hour test data
performed at approximate overburden
pressure, and therefore accounts for
geomembrane intrusion
RFCR 1.4-2.0 1.14 1.14 From Table B-3 of Attachment 3-29. Lab
data represents 100-hour test data, so
lower RF is appropriate.
RFCC 1.5-2.0 1.1-1.5 1.5 Mid-range value of RFCC
RFBC 1.5-2.0 1.1-1.3 1.3 Mid-range value of RFBC

The resulting allowable flow rate as obtained from laboratory testing, accounting for long-term
conditions, Qallow, is 1.5 x 10-5 m3/s (349 gal/day). Therefore, the geonet adequately handles the amount
of flow expected with a single defect without completely filling the geonet at the point of defect. The
factor of safety, FS, against overwhelming the geonet at the point of defect is calculated as follows:
req
allow
Q
QFS=

where Qallow = allowable flow rate, 349 gal/day/defect, and
Qreq = required flow rate as obtained from design, 130 gal/day/defect.

A geonet in the TSF with a transmissivity of 4.4 x 10-3 m2/s has a factor of safety of 2.68 against
overwhelming the geonet at the point of defect. This falls between the recommended range of 2 to 3
given by Koerner (1998). In order to meet a minimum factor of safety of 2 for flow capacity at the point
of defect, the geonet should have a specified minimum transmissivity of 3.3 x 10-3 m2/s at the design
overburden pressure and drainage slope (11,000 psf and 0.06 respectively).

A similar analysis was performed for the geonet in the north and south process ponds, as shown in
Attachment 2. A geonet with a transmissivity of 7.0 x 10-3 m2/s at a design overburden of 1050 psf and a
drainage slope of 0.01 will have adequate capacity. According to a product data presented in Attachment
3-28, the same geonet can be used in the TSF and the process ponds.

Flow Capacity of Leak Detection System. The total flow capacity of a geonet can be calculated using the
following equation:
BCCCCRIN
allow RFRFRFRF
witkQ ×××
×××=

Expressed per flow per unit width, and substituting T = k x t, the above equation can be written as

BCCCCRIN
allow
allow RFRFRFRF
iT
w
Qq ×××
×==

Appendix G.1 9

where k = hydraulic conductivity of geonet,
t = thickness of geonet,
i = gradient, 0.04
w = width of geonet, and
T = Transmissivity = 4.4 x 10-3 m2/s.

The resulting flow per unit width of the geonet is 8.5 x 10-4 ft2/s. As compared to the expected unit flow
rate for the longest flow path of 800 ft (3.7 x 10-6 ft2/s), the total capacity of the geonet is 230 times that
required.

6.0 HEAD ABOVE SECONDARY LINER
Giroud et al. (1997) (see Attachment 3-20) presents a method for calculating the average head on the
secondary liner due to leaks in the primary liner, assuming a worst case condition where all primary liner
defects are located at the higher end of the leak detection layer slope as follows:

ik
QLFt
allow
aveworst ×
××=

where F = Frequency of defects = one per acre
L = Maximum length of geonet in direction of flow = 800 ft
Q = rate of flow through one defect of the primary liner = 130 gal per day,
kallow = allowable hydraulic conductivity of geonet, used in place of k (from laboratory test data)
to account for long-term degradation
i = hydraulic gradient in the leak detection layer = slope of cell floor = 0.04

The allowable hydraulic conductivity, similar to flow and transmissivity, is reduced by factors to account
for long-term conditions as follows:

BCCCCRINLDL
allow RFRFRFRFt
Tk ××××=

Using parameters for transmissivity, geonet thickness, and reduction factors as previously defined, the
resulting kallow is 0.26 m/s, and taveworst is 0.001 inches, well below the requirement of less than one foot of
head on the lower liner.

7.0 TIMELY DETECTION OF LEAKS

The time required for flow from a defect at the farthest point in the cell to travel from the defect to the
leak detection pipe is given by Giroud et al. (1997) as follows (see Attachment 3-21):
ββcossin××
×=
allow
travel k
xnt

where n = porosity of the geonet, assumed to be 0.8,
x = maximum length of geonet in direction of flow = 800 ft,
kallow = allowable hydraulic conductivity of geonet, used in place of k (from laboratory
test data) to account for long-term degradation = 0.26 m/s, and

Appendix G.1 10
β = slope of cell floor, = 0.04 ft/ft = 2.29 degrees.

The resulting ttravel is 18,800 seconds, or 5.2 hours. Therefore, the leak detection system geonet will allow
for timely detection of leakage.

REFERENCES

Hunt, R.E. 1984. Geotechnical Engineering Investigation Manual. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New
York, New York.

Giroud, J.P, Bonaparte, R., 1989. “Leakage through Liners Constructed with Geomembranes”,
Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 8:1-111.

Giroud, J.P, Gross, B.A., Bonaparte, R., and McKelvey, J.A., 1997. “Leachate Flow in Leakage
Collection Layers Due to Defects in Geomembrane Liners”, Geosyntehtics International, 4(3-
4):215-292.

Keshian, B., and R. Rager, 1988. Geotechnical Properties of Hydraulically Placed Uranium Mill Tailings
in Hydraulic Fill Structures, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 21, ed. D.J.A. Van Zyl and
S.G. Vick. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, New York.

Lyntek, Inc., 2007. Draft Uranium One Material Balance Calculations. Email communication to Toby
Wright, Uranium One, dated December 5, 2007.

McWhorter, D.B., and Sunada, D.K. (1997). Ground-Water Hydrology and Hydraulics. Water Resource
Publications, Highlands Ranch, CO.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 1992. “Action Leakage Rates for Leak Detection
Systems”, EP 530-R-92-004, January.

Client:Uranium One Date:24-Oct-08
Job Title:Shootaring Canyon Job No.:181692
Subject:Volume of storm runon By:RTS
Input:
Tailings elevation required to completely cover drain (ft):4412
Time to reach elevation (yr):
at 500 tpd 5.2 (from water balance)
at 750 tpd 3.4 (from water balance)
(Probability of exceedance)
(Solve in terms of return period)
number of years, n :5.2 (from above)
percent chance of exceedance, P:10.0%(10% typically used in building codes)
return interval, T (years):49.4 (calculated)
Therefore, design for 50-year, 24-hr storm
From NOAA Atlas 40
Peak intensity (in/hr):3.35 (NOAA)
Precip Depth, D (in):2.12 (NOAA)
Area of Mill drainage (acre):44.55 (CAD drawings)
Area of South Cell (acre):34.12 (CAD drawings)
Time of Concentration (min):11.67 (from hydrology analysis)
Runoff Coef, Cmill:0.9 (conservative assumption)
Runoff Coef, Ccell:1 (assume no storage, infiltration)
Peak Flow Rate (Rational Method)
Q=CIA(mill)+CIA(cell)(Rational Method)
Peak Flow Rate (cfs):248.6 (calculated)
Peak Flow Rate (gpm):111,581 (unit conversion)
Volume of Runoff
V=DCA(mill)+DCA(cell)
V (acre-ft):13.11 (calculated)
V (cubic feet): 571,129 (unit conversion)
Evacuation Time (hr):72 (assumed)
Required Pumping Rate (gpm):989 (calculated)
)/(1)1(TneYP--=>
)1ln(P
nT-
-=
G:\Uranium One\Technical\Calculations\Leachate Collection_Detection Systems\Pipe spacing3.XLS 10/30/2008
Client:Uranium One Date:24-Oct-08
Job Title:Shootaring Canyon Job No.:181692
Subject:Leachate Collection System By:RTS
Manning's Coefficient (n) =0.01 (typical value for HDPE pipe)
Factor of Safety applied to flow capacities (FS) =2 (design pipes to be flowing approx. half-full)
(1) Calculate the maximum pipe spacing:
D10 of Bedding/Drain Material =2.65 mm Finest gravel that meets filter requirements for 0.125 pipe slots (ADS N-12 pipe)
Hydraulic Conductivity of Bedding Material (k) =3.0E-02 cm/s from Hunt (1984)
9.8E-04 ft/s
5.9E-02 ft/min
Max allowable head on liner between pipes (hmax) =1.5 ft
Head at drain (ho) =0 ft
Mix of Slimes/Sands Sands
Saturated hydraulic conductivity 2.0E-05 cm/sec 1.0E-04 cm/sec Typical values from Keshian and Rager (1988)
6.6E-07 ft/sec 3.3E-06 ft/sec for hydraulically placed uranium tailings
Maximum gradient through tailings 2 2
Application rate, W 1.31E-06 ft/s 6.56E-06 ft/s
4.00E-05 cm/s 2.00E-04 cm/s
W is typically used for application of solution.
This analysis conservatively assumes that the
max value is equal to the saturated hydraulic
conductivity of tailings.
c = ratio of w:k=1.33E-03 6.67E-03
Side Slopes 2.5 xH:1V
phi 0.381 radians
21.8 degrees
82 ft 37 ft (McWhorter and Sunada, 1977, Eq. 4-78)
Pipe Spacing on side slopes (Ls) = 2*hmax/[(sqrt(c)*(tan^2phi/c)+1-(tanphi/c)*sqrt(tan^2phi+c)] =equation 9.4 from Sharma and Lewis Waste
164 ft 73 ft Containment Systems, Waste Stabilization, and Landfills
()
W
khhSpacingo
PIPE
´´-=42max2
G:\Uranium One\Technical\Calculations\Leachate Collection_Detection Systems\Pipe spacing3.XLS 10/30/2008
(2) Calculate the maximum pipe length of 4" pipe:
Pipe Diameter (D) =0.3333 ft 0.3333 ft
Design Pipe Spacing (L) =80 ft 40 ft
Minimum Slope (S) =0.01 ft/ft 0.01 ft/ft
Flow Capacity (FC) = 1.486*PI*SQRT(S)*D^(8/3)/4^(5/3)/n = (Manning's Equation)
FC =0.25 cfs 0.25 cfs
Design Flow Capacity (DFC) = Flow Capacity/FS 0.12 cfs 0.12 cfs
Maximum Pipe Length (PL) = DFC/W/L
PL =1178 ft 471 ft limit max pipe length to mid value = 800 ft
(3) Calculate Pipe Diameter of Collector Pipes:
Pipe Segment Pipe Min Slope Contributing Maximum Design Calculated Calculated Design Pipe FS
Length (ft)(ft/ft)Area (ft)Flow Flow Pipe Size Pipe Size Pipe Size Capacity
(cfs)(cfs)(ft)(in)(in)(cfs)
4-in collector 550 0.01 44000 0.058 0.115 0.250 3.0 4 0.247 4.3
S1 perforated 425 0.037 259,002 0.340 0.680 0.381 4.6 5 0.863 2.5
S2 perforated 795 0.034 320,022 0.420 0.840 0.418 5.0 5 0.833 2.0
S3 perforated 545 0.038 713,505 0.936 1.873 0.553 6.6 7 2.158 2.3
S4 perforated 985 0.048 400,774 0.526 1.052 0.428 5.1 6 1.592 3.0
S5 perforated 470 0.056 275,617 0.362 0.723 0.361 4.3 5 1.057 2.9
S6 perforated 545 0.038 347,522 0.456 0.912 0.423 5.1 6 1.422 3.1
sqft acre
S area 2,316,442 53.2
G:\Uranium One\Technical\Calculations\Leachate Collection_Detection Systems\Pipe spacing3.XLS 10/30/2008
Client:Uranium One Date:24-Oct-08
Job Title:Shootaring Canyon Job No.:181692
Subject:Time Required to Dewater Tailings By:RTS
(Darcy's seepage velocity)
hydraulic conductivity of tailings, k (cm/s):2.00E-05 Typical values from Keshian and Rager (1988) for hydraulically placed uranium tailings
hydraulic gradient through tailings, i (unitless):1 unit gradient for vertical flow through tailings
effective porosity of geonet, n (unitless):0.35 typical value
maximum depth of tailings, d (ft):58.7 tailings from elevation 4363 to 4421.7 under 750 tpd scenario
seepage velocity, vs (cm/s):5.71E-05 calculated
seepage velocity, vs (ft/s):1.87E-06 unit conversion
dewatering time (sec)3.13E+07
dewatering time (day)362
n
ikvs
´=svdtime/=
G:\Uranium One\Technical\Calculations\Leachate Collection_Detection Systems\Pipe spacing3.XLS 10/30/2008
Client:Uranium One Date:24-Oct-08
Job Title:Shootaring Canyon Job No.:181692
Subject:Action Leakage Rate By:RTS
Action Leakage Rate
Sources:
Values from
2007 TMP
Input Parameter Value Unit Source
Cb 0.6 unitless Giroud and Bonaparte (1989) Table 9 0.6
Defect diameter 2 mm typical value for small defect 2.08
0.002 m unit conversion 0.00208
0.079 in unit conversion 0.082
Area of hole in membrane 3.142E-06 m^2 calculated 3.398E-06
3.380E-05 ft^2 unit conversion 3.656E-05
rate of holes 1 holes/acre typical value 1
head on geomembrane, hw 1.5 ft max allowable head on liner 3
0.4572 m unit conversion 0.9144
acceleration due to gravity, g 9.81 m/s^2 value 9.81
South Cell area of liner 1,331,704 ft^2 rough ACAD estimate with 1.06 correction for side slopes 1940400
30.6 acre 44.55
South Cell
Flow from defect in geomembrane into geonet, Q
Q per defect = Cb*a*sqrt(2*g*hw)5.65E-06 m^3/s per defect 8.64E-06
Q per defect 128.7 gal/day/defect
Q total for lined area 1.73E-04 m^3/s 3.85E-04
Q total for lined area 3936 gal/day 8.8E+03
Q per lined acre 129 gal/acre/day 196.9
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste, 1992. Action Leakage Rates For Leak Detection Systems (Supplemental Background Document for the Final
Double Liners and Leak Detection Systems Rule for Hazardous Waste Landfills, Waste Piles, and Surface Impoundments). EPA 530-R-92-004, PB92-128214. January
1992.
Giroud, J.P. and Bonaparte, R, 1989. Leakage through Liners Constructed with Geomembranes - Part II. Composite Liners, Geotextiles and Geomembranes.
Giroud, J.P., Gross, B.A., Bonaparte, R., and McKelvey, J.A., 1997. Leachate Fow in Leakage Collection Layers Due to Defects in Geomembrane Liners, Geosynthetics
International, Vol. 4, Nos. 3-4, p. 215-292.
(Giroud et al. 1997, Eq. 20)primhgaQ´´´´=26.0
G:\Uranium One\Technical\Calculations\Leachate Collection_Detection Systems\Pipe spacing3.XLS 10/30/2008
Client:Uranium One Date:18-Oct-08
Job Title:Shootaring Canyon Job No.:181692
Subject:Flow through geonet By:RTS
This equation calculates the capacity of the geonet required so
geonet is not full at point of defect.
(Giroud et al. 1997, Eq. 12)
(definition of transmissivity)
Overburden height (ft):100 (CAD drawings)
Moist unit weight (pcf)110 (typical property)
Maximum overburden pressure (psf):11000
Grade of cell floor (ft/ft):0.04-0.06
Transmissivity, T (m2/s):4.40E-03 (Figure A-7 of GSE Draingage Design Manual)
geonet thickness, t (mil):300 (Figure A-7 of GSE Drainage Design Manual)
geonet thickness, t (m):0.00762 (unit conversion)
Qfull (m^3/s)3.35E-05 (calculated)
Qfull (gpd)764.8 (unit conversion)
(Koerner, Eq. 4.5)
Reduction Factor against intrusion, RF IN:1
Reduction Factor against creep, RF CR:1.14
Reduction Factor against chemical clogging, RF CC:1.5
Reduction Factor against biological clogging, RF BC:1.3
Qallow (m^3/s):1.51E-05 (calculated)
Qallow (gpd):344.0 (unit conversion)
(Factor of Safety definition)
Qreq (m^3/sec):5.65E-06 (Action leakage rate, per defect)
Qreq (gpd):128.7 (unit conversion)
FS:2.67 (calculated)
(recommended FS between 2 and 3)
Transmissivity required for min FS of 2 (m2/s):3.29E-03
Transmissivity required for min FS of 2 (m2/s):3.54E-02

´´´=
BCCCCRIN
fullallow RFRFRFRFQQ1
req
allow
Q
QFS=
2
LDLfulltkQ´=
LDLtkT´=
G:\Uranium One\Technical\Calculations\Leachate Collection_Detection Systems\Pipe spacing3.XLS 10/30/2008
Client:Uranium One Date:18-Oct-08
Job Title:Shootaring Canyon Job No.:181692
Subject:Capacity of LDS By:RTS
Zone SD1 SD2 SD3 SD4
ACTION LEAKAGE RATES, ALR
Area (ft^2))320,000 236,100 279,200 521,400
Area (acre)7.35 5.42 6.41 11.97
Longest Flow path (ft)800 400 500 500
Action leakage rate, gpad 130 130 130 130
Action leakage rate, ft/s 4.6E-09 4.6E-09 4.6E-09 4.6E-09
Action leakage rate of
zone, gpd 955 705 833 1556
Action leakage rate of
zone, gpm 0.66 0.49 0.58 1.08
Action leakage rate of
zone, cfs 0.0015 0.0011 0.0013 0.0024
Action leakage rate per
unit width of flow, ft2/s 3.7E-06 1.8E-06 2.3E-06 2.3E-06
GEONET CAPACITY
Geonet Capacity per unit width = T * i /LTRF
Transmisivity, T (m2/sec)4.40E-03 4.40E-03 4.40E-03 4.40E-03
Transmisivity, T (ft2/sec)4.73E-02 4.73E-02 4.73E-02 4.73E-02
min gradient of geonet, i 0.040 0.043 0.040 0.050
Long Term Reduction
Factor, LTRF 2.22 2.22 2.22 2.22 From Koerner
Geonet Capacity (ft2/sec)8.52E-04 9.26E-04 8.52E-04 1.06E-03
Factor of Safety of Geonet
= Geonet Capacity/ALR
per unit width of flow 231 501 369 461
LDS PIPE CAPACITY
Pipe Capacity = 1.486*PI*SQRT(S)*D^(8/3)/4^(5/3)/n = (Manning's Equation)
minimum pipe slope, S 0.01
pipe diameter, D (ft)0.25
Mannings n 0.010
Pipe Capacity (cfs)0.115
Factor of Safety of Pipe =
Pipe Capacity/ALR of
zone (cfs)78 105 89 48
(Darcy's flow capacity in terms of
Transmissivity, reduced for long-term flow
capacity
G:\Uranium One\Technical\Calculations\Leachate Collection_Detection Systems\Pipe spacing3.XLS 10/30/2008
Client:Uranium One Date:24-Oct-08
Job Title:Shootaring Canyon Job No.:181692
Subject:Fluid head within geonet By:RTS
(Giroud et al. 1997, Eq. 197)
(Definition of Transmissivity)
Frequency of defects, F (per acre):1 (per ALR calculations)
Frequency of defects, F (per m^2):0.000247 (unit conversion)
Maximum length of geonet in direction of flow, L (ft):800 (per CAD drawings)
Maximum length of geonet in direction of flow, L (m):243.90244 (unit conversion)
Rate of flow through one defect, Q (gpm):129 (per ALR calculations)
Rate of flow through one defect, Q (m^3/s):5.65E-06 (per ALR calculations)
Transmissivity, T (m^2/s):4.40E-03 (Figure A-7 of GSE Drainage Design Manual)
Total Reduction factor 2.223 (Combination of all RF's from LDS capacity calc)
Allowable tranmissivity, Tallow (m^2/s)1.98E-03 (calculated)
Geonet thickness, t (m)0.007622 (Figure A-7 of GSE Drainage Design Manual)
Allowable hydraulic conductivity of geonet, kallow (m/s):0.260 (calculated)
hydraulic gradient LDS (slope of cell floor), i (ft/ft):0.04 (from CAD drawings)
Fluid head withing geonet, taveworst (m):3.27E-05 (calculated)
Fluid head withing geonet, taveworst (mm):0.033 (unit conversion)
Fluid head withing geonet, taveworst (in):0.001 (unit conversion)
ik
QLFtaveworst´
´´=
k tT=
G:\Uranium One\Technical\Calculations\Leachate Collection_Detection Systems\Pipe spacing3.XLS 10/30/2008
Client:Uranium One Date:24-Oct-08
Job Title:Shootaring Canyon Job No.:181692
Subject:Timely detection within geonet By:RTS
(Giroud et al. 1997, Eq. 207)
Porosity of geonet, n:0.8 (assumed value for geonet)
800 (from CAD drawings)
243.9 (unit conversion)
2.60E-01 (calculated based on Tallow, t)
slope of cell floor (ft/ft), b :0.04 (from CAD drawings)
slope of cell floor (radians), b:0.0400 (unit conversion)
slope of cell floor (degrees), b:2.29061 (unit conversion)
Dection time, ttravel (sec):1.88E+04
Dection time, ttravel (hrs):5.2
maximum length of geonet in direction of flow, x (ft):
allowable hydraulic conductivity of geonet, kallow (m/s):
maximum length of geonet in direction of flow, x (m):
bbcossin´´
´=k
xnttravel
G:\Uranium One\Technical\Calculations\Leachate Collection_Detection Systems\Pipe spacing3.XLS 10/30/2008
Client:Uranium One Date:22-Oct-08
Job Title:Shootaring Canyon Job No.:1005462
Subject:Action Leakage Rate-Process Ponds By:RTS
Action Leakage Rate
Sources:
Input Parameter Value Source
Cb:0.6 Giroud and Bonaparte (1989) Table 9
Defect diameter (mm):2 typical value for small defect
Defect diameter (m):0.002 unit conversion
Defect diameter (in):0.079 unit conversion
Area of hole in membrane, a (m^2)3.142E-06 calculated
Area of hole in membrane, a (ft^2)3.380E-05 unit conversion
rate of holes (holes/acre)1 typical value
rate of holes (holes/m^2)0.000247 unit conversion
acceleration due to gravity, g (m/s^s)9.81 value
North Process Pond South Process Pond
Plan view area base (ft^2)96,366 70,425
Plan view area 3:1 slopes (ft^2)51,490 79,796
Slope correction factor 1.05 1.05
Total liner area (ft^2)150,641 154,537
Total sumberged liner area at max water elevation (ft^2)134,319 127,828
Area (acre)3.46 3.55
Longest Flow path
(ft)380 340
Maximum Head of
Liner (average) (ft):8.6 14.8
Maximum Head of
Liner (average) (m):2.6 4.5
Maximum Action Leakage Rate
North Process Pond South Process Pond
Qmax per defect = Cb*a*sqrt(2*g*hw)
Qmax per defect (m^3/sec/defect 1.35E-05 1.77E-05
Qmax per defect (gal/day/defect)308.3 404.5
Qmax total for lined area (m^3/s)4.48E-04 5.60E-04
Qmax total for lined area (gal/min)7.1 8.9
Qmax total for lined area (gal/day)10,228 12,769
Qmax per lined acre (gal/acre/min)2.1 2.5
Qmax per lined acre (gal/acre/day)308.3 404.5
Giroud, J.P. and Bonaparte, R, 1989. Leakage through Liners Constructed with Geomembranes - Part II. Composite Liners, Geotextiles and Geomembranes.
Giroud, J.P., Gross, B.A., Bonaparte, R., and McKelvey, J.A., 1997. Leachate Fow in Leakage Collection Layers Due to Defects in Geomembrane Liners, Geosynthetics International, Vol. 4, Nos. 3-4, p. 215-292.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste, 1992. Action Leakage Rates For Leak Detection Systems (Supplemental Background Document for the Final Double Liners and Leak Detection Systems Rule for Hazardous
Waste Landfills, Waste Piles, and Surface Impoundments). EPA 530-R-92-004, PB92-128214. January 1992.
(Giroud et al 1997) equation 20primhgaQ´´´´=26.0
G:\Uranium One\Technical\Calculations\Leachate Collection_Detection Systems\process pond ALR.xls 10/30/2008
Action Leakage Rate as a function of pond elevation
Elevation of water
(ft)Pond Depth (ft)
Average Head on
Liner (ft)
Liner Area
(corrected for slope)
(ft^2)ALR (gal/day)
Elevation of water
(ft)Pond Depth (ft)
Average Head on
Liner (ft)
Liner Area
(corrected for slope)
(ft^2)ALR (gal/day)
4474 0.1 0.1 1268 10 4465 0 0.1 41 0
4475 1 0.5 19905 365 4466 1 0.3 12541 178
4476 2 1 58773 1,526 4467 2 0.5 38124 700
4477 3 1.5 91271 2,903 4468 3 1 63706 1,654
4478 4 2 105587 3,877 4469 4 2 71686 2,632
4479 5 3 109667 4,932 4470 5 3 80001 3,598
4480 6 4 113920 5,916 4471 6 4 83942 4,359
4481 7 5 118242 6,865 4472 7 5 87883 5,102
4482 8 6 122633 7,800 4473 8 6 91977 5,849
4483 9 7 127127 8,734 4474 9 7 96070 6,599
4484 10 8 131622 9,667 4475 10 8 100315 7,367
4484.6 10.6 8.6 134319 10,228 4476 11 9 104561 8,144
4477 12 10 108956 8,946
4478 13 11 113351 9,761
4479 14 12 117890 10,603
4480 15 13 122428 11,461
4481 16 14 126131 12,253
4481.8 16.8 14.8 127828 12,768
South Process PondNorth Process Pond
G:\Uranium One\Technical\Calculations\Leachate Collection_Detection Systems\process pond ALR.xls 10/30/2008

Figure G.1-1 Action Leakage Rates for North and South Process Ponds

0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000
Action leakage rate (gal/day)
Fl
u
i
d

D
e
p
t
h

(
f
t
)
North Process
Pond
South Process
Pond
Maximum ALR = 12,770
gal/day
Maximum ALR = 10,230 gal/day

Client:Uranium One Date:27-Oct-08
Job Title:Shootaring Canyon Job No.:181692
Subject:Flow through geonet-Process Ponds By:RTS
This equation calculates the capacity of the geonet required so
geonet is not full at point of defect.
(Giroud et al. 1997, Eq. 12)
(definition of tranmissivity)
Max Pond depth (ft):16.8 (water balance calcs)
Moist unit weight (pcf)62.4 (typical property)
Maximum overburden pressure (psf):1048
Grade of cell floor (ft/ft):0.01
Transmissivity, T (m2/s):1.00E-02 (Figure A-7 of GSE Draingage Design Manual)
geonet thickness, t (mil):300 (Figure A-7 of GSE Drainage Design Manual)
geonet thickness, t (m):0.00762 (unit conversion)
Qfull (m^3/s)7.62E-05 (calculated)
Qfull (gpd)1738.2 (unit conversion)
(Koerner, Eq. 4.5)
Reduction Factor against intrusion, RF IN:1
Reduction Factor against creep, RF CR:1.01 (Table B-1 of GSE Drainage Design Manual)
Reduction Factor against chemical clogging, RF CC:1.5 (Table 4.4 of GSE Drainage Design Manual)
Reduction Factor against biological clogging, RF BC:1.3 (Table 4.4 of GSE Drainage Design Manual)
Qallow (m^3/s):3.87E-05 (calculated)
Qallow (gpd):882.6 (unit conversion)
(Factor of Safety definition)
Qreq (m^3/sec):1.35E-05 (Action leakage rate, per defect)
Qreq (gpd):404.5 (unit conversion)
FS:2.18 (calculated)
(recommended FS between 2 and 3)
Transmissivity required for min FS of 2:6.99E-03

´´´=
BCCCCRIN
fullallow RFRFRFRFQQ1
req
allow
Q
QFS=
2
LDLfulltkQ´=
LDLtkT´=
G:\Uranium One\Technical\Calculations\Leachate Collection_Detection Systems\process pond ALR.xls 10/30/2008
Client:Uranium One Date:27-Oct-08
Job Title:Shootaring Canyon Job No.:1005462
Subject:Capacity of LDS -Process Ponds By:RTS
Zone North Process Pond South Process Pond
ACTION LEAKAGE RATES, ALR
Area (ft^2)134,319 127,828
Area (acre)3.08 2.93
Longest Flow path (ft)380 340
Action leakage rate, gpad 308 404
Action leakage rate, ft/s 1.1E-08 1.4E-08
Action leakage rate of
zone, gpd 951 1187
Action leakage rate of
zone, gpm 0.66 0.82
Action leakage rate of
zone, cfs 0.0015 0.0018
Action leakage rate per
unit width of flow, ft2/s 4.2E-06 4.9E-06
GEONET CAPACITY
Geonet Capacity per unit width = T * i /LTRF
Transmisivity, T (m2/sec)1.00E-02 1.00E-02
Transmisivity, T (ft2/sec)1.08E-01 1.08E-01
min gradient of geonet, i 0.010 0.010
Long Term Reduction
Factor, LTRF 1.97 1.97
Geonet Capacity (ft2/sec)5.46E-04 5.46E-04
Factor of Safety of Geonet
= Geonet Capacity/ALR
per unit width of flow 131 112
GEONET CAPACITY AT ENTRANCE TO SUMP
Assume flow is funneled down to 15 linear feet of geonet at entrance to sump. Check FS against bottleneck.
Geonet Capacity = T*i*W /LTRF
Width of geonet at sump
(ft)15 15
Transmisivity, T (m2/sec)1.00E-02 1.00E-02
Transmisivity, T (ft2/sec)1.08E-01 1.08E-01
min gradient of geonet, i 0.010 0.010
Long Term Reduction
Factor, LTRF 1.97 1.97
Geonet Capacity (ft2/sec)8.19E-03 8.19E-03
Factor of Safety of Geonet
= Geonet Capacity/ALR 6 4
(Darcy's flow in terms of Transmissivity, reduced long-term
flow capacity)
(Darcy's flow in terms of Transmissivity, reduced long-term
flow capacity)
G:\Uranium One\Technical\Calculations\Leachate Collection_Detection Systems\process pond ALR.xls 10/30/2008
Client:Uranium One Date:27-Oct-08
Job Title:Shootaring Canyon Job No.:181692
Subject:Fluid head within geonet - Process Ponds By:RTS
(Giroud et al. 1997,Eq. 197)
(Definition of Transmissivity)
Frequency of defects, F (per acre):1 (per ALR calculations)
Frequency of defects, F (per m^2):0.000247 (unit conversion)
Maximum length of geonet in direction of flow, L (ft):380 (per CAD drawings)
Maximum length of geonet in direction of flow, L (m):115.9 (unit conversion)
Rate of flow through one defect, Q (gpd):404 (per ALR calculations)
Rate of flow through one defect, Q (m^3/s):1.77E-05 (per ALR calculations)
Transmissivity, T (m^2/s):1.00E-02 (Figure A-7 of GSE Drainage Design Manual)
Total Reduction factor 1.97 (Combination of all RF's from LDS capacity calc)
Allowable tranmissivity, Tallow (m^2/s)5.08E-03 (calculated)
Geonet thickness, t (m)0.007622 (Figure A-7 of GSE Drainage Design Manual)
Allowable hydraulic conductivity of geonet, kallow (m/s):0.666 (calculated)
hydraulic gradient LDS (slope of cell floor), i (ft/ft):0.01 (from CAD drawings)
Fluid head withing geonet, taveworst (m):7.618E-05 (calculated)
Fluid head withing geonet, taveworst (mm):0.076 (unit conversion)
Fluid head withing geonet, taveworst (in):0.003 (unit conversion)
ik
QLFtaveworst´
´´=
k tT=
G:\Uranium One\Technical\Calculations\Leachate Collection_Detection Systems\process pond ALR.xls 10/30/2008
Client:Uranium One Date:27-Oct-08
Job Title:Shootaring Canyon Job No.:181692
Subject:Timely detection within geonet - Process Ponds By:RTS
(Giroud et al 1997, Eq. 207)
Porosity of geonet, n:0.8 (assumed value for geonet)
maximum length of geonet in direction of flow, x (ft):380 (from CAD drawings)
maximum length of geonet in direction of flow, x (m):115.9 (unit conversion)
allowable hydraulic conductivity of geonet, kallow (m/s):6.66E-01 (calculated based on Tallow, t)
slope of cell floor (ft/ft), b:0.01 (from CAD drawings)
slope of cell floor (radians), b:0.0100 (unit conversion)
slope of cell floor (degrees), b:0.5729387 (unit conversion)
Dection time, ttravel (sec):1.39E+04
Dection time, ttravel (hrs):3.9
bbcossin´´
´=k
xnttravel
G:\Uranium One\Technical\Calculations\Leachate Collection_Detection Systems\process pond ALR.xls 10/30/2008

APPENDIX G.2
LABORATORY TESTING RESULTS FOR CLAY/LINER MATERIALS
Report of Geotechnical Laboratory Testing Uranium One, USA
Shootaring Canyon Borrow Materials Characterization
Tetra Tech
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
140
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
40/60 Blend
50/50 Blends
60/40 Blends
Dr
y

U
n
i
t

W
e
i
g
h
t

(
p
c
f
)
Water Content (%)
Gs = 2.6
Gs = 2.7
Gs = 2.8
Zero Air Voids Curves:
Solid symbols indicate permeability specimens
Modified effort curves
Standard effort curves
Reduced effort curves

Laboratory Compaction Curves for
Clay/Sand Blends

APPENDIX G.3
PRIMARY LINER CUSHIONING

Appendix G.3 1
APPENDIX G.3
Primary Liner Cushioning

1.0 INTRODUCTION
This calculation package has been prepared to evaluate the need for a cushioning layer over to top of the
primary liner system at the Shootaring Canyon Tailings Storage Facility. Research and current practice
indicate that placing a geotextile cushion or a 6-inch thick sand layer between a geomembrane and large
diameter drainage materials will help to protect the geomembrane from puncture.

1.1 Cushion Design Methodology
The design methodology presented in Technical Note SM-116, prepared by S. Valero, and D. Austin –
Synthetic Industries, Inc, September 1999 (Valero, Austin 1999), was relied upon to for the following
analysis.

Equation 1 of Valero and Austin provides the basis to calculate the required thickness of the geotextile
required to cushion a geomembrane from a wide variety of rocks or other protuberances.

P’allow = [450*MA/H2][1/(MFSxMFPCxMFA)][1/(FSCRxFSCBD)]

Where:

P’allow =Allowable pressure on the geomembrane > FSgmin x Pactual
MA = Required mass per unit area (g/m2)
H = Effective height of protrusion (mm)
MFS = Modification Factor (MF) for protrusion shape
MFPC = MF for protrusion configuration
MFA = MF for overburden arching effect
FSCR = Factor of safety for geotextile creep
FSCBD = FS for geotextile chemical/biological degradation

The values used for these various factors can be found in Tables 1-6 of Technical Note SM-116.

1.2 Calculations
Calculations to evaluate the required thickness of a geotextile cushioning layer were performed using
Equation 1 and the associated variables. Table 1 presents the values chosen for each parameter of the
equation. Some of the values presented are dependent on the weight of material bearing on the geotextile.
The result of this is that the depth of the tailings at the deepest point of the facility requires that a very
heavy geotextile be used. However, as the depth of tailings overlying the geotextile is reduced, lighter
weight geotextiles can be used to provide the same degree of protection to the underlying geomembrane.
Table 1 also presents the depth of tailings overlying the geomembrane and the corresponding thickness
(weight per square yard) of geotextile necessary to protect the liner. Geotextile weights range from 8
oz/yd2 to 20 oz/yd2 depending on the depth of tailings impounded above the liner.

The need for a geotextile over the liner in the anchor trenches was also evaluated. Based on data obtained
during previous site investigations the maximum particle size of sand derived from the Entrada formation
indicates that 100 percent of the material passed a No. 16 Standard US Sieve (1.18mm). In addition, site
investigations have confirmed that the Entrada formation is very friable and breaks down into sand during
excavation and recompaction. Calculations based on the maximum particle size of the Entrada formation

Appendix G.3 2
show that the amount of protection provided by placing a geotextile over the anchor trench backfill will
be negligible. In addition, current liner placement practice allows placement of a medium to fine grain
sand layer in place of a geotextile cushion. Placement of a geotextile cushion will reduce the interface
friction between the geomembrane and the soil in the anchor trench thereby reducing the pullout capacity
of the geotextile. Therefore, placement of the geotextile over the liner in the anchor trench is not required
or recommended.

For the Process Ponds, an 8 oz/yd2 nonwoven geotextile is recommended based on the calculations
computed for the TSF. The maximum depth of the Process Ponds is 23 feet.

Appendix G.3 3
Table 1 Summary of Parameters and Geotextile Weight Calculations, Shootaring Canyon Uranium Mill - Tailings Storage Facility
MA Pactual
Depth of Cover P'all (kPa) g/m2 oz/yd2
oz/yd2
(equiv) H MFs MFPC MFA FSCR FSCBD FSgmin (psf) kPa
110 2403.77 649.55 19.16 20.00 12.70 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.26 1.20 4.56 11000.00 526.68
87 1901.16 540.02 15.93 16.00 12.70 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.32 1.20 4.56 8700.00 416.56
55 1201.88 400.84 11.82 12.00 12.70 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.55 1.20 4.56 5500.00 263.34
32 699.28 267.62 7.89 8.00 12.70 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.78 1.20 4.56 3200.00 153.22
Anchor Trench
2 18.21 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.78 1.20 1.90 200.00 9.58

APPENDIX G.4
BURIED PIPE LOADING

Appendix G.4 1
APPENDIX G.4
Buried Pipe Loading

1.0 INTRODUCTION
The load bearing capacity of the piping that is installed as a component in the leak detection, leachate
collection and recovery system and the sump access pipes must be sufficient to withstand the load
imposed by the overburden above the pipes. The maximum height of overburden on the LCS piping for
the current design is approximately 80 feet; however the overburden of 110 feet was used for the design
calculations to allow for future expansion of the South Cell. The overburden includes the maximum
tailings thickness, random fill up to 1.5 feet and a final cover thickness of 6.5 feet. Leak detection and
leachate collection piping is specified as 3- to 8-inch diameter, standard dimension ration (SDR) 15.5,
perforated HDPE pipe. The sump access pipes are specified as 4-inch and 12-inch diameter, SDR 9,
solid-wall HDPE pipe. The methods used to evaluate the deflection, potential buckling and crushing of
the pipes under the imposed loads are as presented in the “Polyethylene Pipe Handbook” available on-line
from Plastic Pipe Institute (PPI, 2006). The following sections describe the method of analysis.
Spreadsheets showing example calculations are presented at the end of this appendix. Calculations are
presented for SDR 17 pipe (approximately 9% reduction in ratio of outer diameter to wall thickness as
compared to SDR 15.5 pipe) to approximate some loss in strength of SDR 15.5 pipe due to perforations.

2.0 PIPE BEDDING
Characterization of the material in which the pipe is embedded greatly influences the reaction of the
buried pipe to the imposed overburden loads. The piping in the leak detection and leachate collection
system will be embedded in a minimum depth of 24 inches of drainage sands and gravels that blanket the
base of the TSF. Therefore, the bedding material has been characterized as gravely sands and gravels
compacted to 90% standard proctor density.

The sump access pipes are routed up 2.5H:1V and 2.0H:1V slopes. It is difficult to place and compact
bedding around the pipe on the slopes. However, dumped gravel will be placed around the access pipes
from the sump to surround, anchor, and protect these access pipes. The bedding material will be gravely
sands and gravels compacted (or dumped) to 85% standard Proctor density.

3.0 RING DEFLECTION
Ring deflection is the normal response of flexible pipes to soil pressure. The deflection leads to the
redistribution of soil stress and the initiation of arching. A method presented in PPI (2006, pg. 227-230)
uses the Watkins-Gaube Graph. This method does not rely on the soil reaction modulus (E’). It is based
on the concept that the deflection of a pipe embedded in a layer of soil is proportional to the compression
or settlement of the soil layer and that the constant of proportionality is a function of the relative stiffness
between the pipe and the soil. To use the Watkins-Gaube Graph, the designer first determines the relative
stiffness between pipe and soil, which is given by the Rigidity Factor, RF, as calculated by the following
formula:

E
DRERS
F
3)1(12 −=

where: DR = Dimension Ratio = Outside diameter of pipe/wall thickness,
ES = Secant modulus of the soil (psi), and
E = Apparent modulus of elasticity of pipe material (psi).

Appendix G.4 2
The secant modulus of the soil may be related to the one-dimensional modulus, MS, by the following
equation:

)1(
)21)(1(
μ
μμ
−
−+=SSME
where: MS = one-dimension modulus, and
μ = soil’s Poisson ratio.

A typical value of Ms is interpolated from Table 2-14 of PPI (2006) to be 2828 psi for a vertical soil stress
of 76 psi (110 feet of overburden at a moist unit weight of 100 pcf) and pipe embedment in gravely sands
and gravels compacted to 90% standard proctor density. A typical value of the Poisson ratio for dense
sand of 0.3 was used (from Table 2-15 of PPI, 2006). The Dimension Ratio is available from tabulated
values from PPI (2006) for the selected pipe diameter and SDR. The long-term (50 years) apparent
modulus of elasticity for HDPE pipe is estimated to be 28,200 psi, reflecting approximately a 75%
reduction of the short-term modulus value, as recommended by PPI (2006, Table 2-6).

Next, the Deformation Factor, DF, is determined by entering the Watkins-Gaube Graph, as presented
below, with the Rigidity Factor.

The Deformation Factor is the proportionality constant between vertical deflection (compression) of the
soil layer containing the pipe and the deflection of the pipe. Thus, pipe deflection can be obtained by
multiplying the proportionality constant DF times the soil settlement. If DF is less than 1.0 from the above
figure, 1.0 is used. The soil layer surrounding the pipe bears the entire load of the overburden above it
without arching. Therefore, settlement (compression) of the soil layer is proportional to the prism load
and not the radial directed earth pressure. Soil strain, εS, may be determined from the following equation:

Appendix G.4 3
S
s E
wH
144=ε

where: w = unit weight of soil (pcf), and
H = height of fill above pipe crown (ft).

The height of fill above the pipe crown is approximately 110 feet. The pipe deflection as a percent of the
diameter can be found by multiplying the soil strain, in percent, by the deformation factor:

sF
M
DD
X ε=Δ )100(

where: ΔX/DM = deflection.

As discussed in PPI (2006, pg.215), a 7.5 percent deflection limit provides a large safety factor against
instability and strain and is considered a safe design deflection for non-pressure applications.

Ring Deflection using Spangler’s Modified Iowa formula, which does not account for the effects of soil
arching, was also calculated for comparison. Methods are presented in PPI (2006, pg. 207-215). Details
of these calculations are shown on the spreadsheets at the end of this appendix.

4.0 CONSTRAINED BUCKLING
Constrained buckling for pipes below the ground water level was evaluated using the Luscher Equation as
follows (from PPI 2006, pg.218-219):

3)1(12''65.5
−=DR
EERBNPWC

where: PWC = allowable constrained buckling pressure (psi),
N = safety factor,
R = buoyancy reduction factor, and
E’ = soil reaction modulus (psi).

The buoyancy reduction factor and the B’ term are calculated using the following equations:

H
HR GW33.01−=

)065.0(41
1'HeB−+=

where: HGW = height of ground water above pipe (ft).

The height of ground water above pipe is estimated to be 100 feet (assuming tailings are saturated when
cover is placed). Although buckling occurs rapidly, long-term external pressure can gradually deform the
pipe to the point of instability. This behavior is considered viscoelastic and can be accounted for by using
the long-term (50 years) apparent modulus of elasticity value of 28,200 psi, as recommended by PPI

Appendix G.4 4
(2006, Table 2-6). The soil reaction modulus is estimated to be 3000 psi for the leak detection and
leachate collection systems with well compacted sand and gravel bedding material. The soil reaction
modulus is reduced to 2000 psi for the sump access pipes to reflect the lesser degree of compaction of the
bedding material on the side slopes (see PPI 2006, pg. 211-212). A typical safety factor of 2.0 has been
used for thermoplastic pipe. The allowable constrained buckling pressure should be compared to the total
vertical stress acting on the pipe crown from the combined load of soil and ground water.

Constrained buckling was also computed using the Moore-Selig Equation (see PPI 2006, pg. 231) for
comparison purposes. However, this method is not as applicable because it does not take into account the
buoyancy reduction factor to account for pipes below the water level. These calculations are presented in
the spreadsheets at the end of this appendix.

5.0 WALL CRUSHING
The combined horizontal and vertical earth load acting on a buried pipe creates a radially-directed
compressive load acting around the pipe’s circumference. When a PE pipe is subjected to ring
compression, thrust stress develops around the pipe hoop, and the pipe’s circumference will shorten
slightly. The shortening permits “thrust arching”. That is, the pipe hoop thrust stiffness is less than the
soil hoop thrust stiffness and, as the pipe deforms, less load follows the pipe. The Vertical Arching
Factor (VAF) (see PPI 2006, pg. 225-227) is calculated as follows:

5.2
171.088.0 +
−−=
A
A
S
SVAF
where: SA = Hoop Thrust Stiffness Ratio.

The Hoop Thrust Stiffness Ratio can be calculated as follow:

EA
rMScentS
A
43.1=

Where: rcent = radius to centroidal axis of pipe (in), and
A = wall thickness for DR pipe (in).

As discussed above for ring deflection, Ms is interpolated from Table 2.14 of PPI (2006) to be 2828 psi.
The long-term (50 years) apparent modulus of elasticity, E, is estimated to be 28,200 psi.

The radial directed earth pressure, PRD, can be found by multiplying the prism load (pressure) by the
vertical arching factor as follows:

wHVAFPRD)(=

The wall crushing calculation is basically a comparison of the allowable compressive stress in the pipe
wall with the ring compressive stress imposed by the loading. The ring compressive stress, S, is
determined as follows:

288
DRPSRD=

Appendix G.4 5
The compressive stress in the pipe wall can be compared to the pipe material allowable compressive
stress. The allowable long-term compressive stress value for PE3408 material is 1,000 psi (PPI 2006, pg.
217).

6.0 REFERENCES
Plastic Pipe Institute (PPI), 2006. Handbook of Polyethelene Pipe, 1st edition.
Client:Uranium One Date:5/1/2008
Job:Shootaring Canyon Job No.:181692
Subject:Buried Pipe Calculations By:RTS
Calculations for PE3408 (black) HDPE pipe, IPS Dimensions
Nominal Diameter (in)3
Dimension Ratio, Do/t, DR 17
Outside Diameter, Do (in)3.5 Plastic Pipe Inst. PE pipe handbk
Inside Diameter (in)3.06 Plastic Pipe Inst. PE pipe handbk
Min W all Thickness, t (in)0.206 Plastic Pipe Inst. PE pipe handbk
Depth of Soil Cover, H (ft)110 cell design
Soil Density, w (pcf)100
Bedding Soil Compaction 90% Std. Proctor
Vertical Soil Pressure (psi)76.39
Compressive Ring Thrust (Wall Crushing) and Vertical Arching Factor
VAF=0.88-0.71*(SA-1)/(SA+2.5)
SA=1.43*Ms*rcent/E/t
PRD=VAF*w*H
Ms (psi)2828 Table 2-14, interpolate between 60 and 80 psi
rcent (in)1.64
Apparent Modulus of Elasticity, E (psi)28200 50-year value from Plastic Pipe Inst. PE pipe handbk
average cross-sectional area or wall
thickness for DR pipe, A (in)0.206
Hoop Thrust Stiffness Ratio, SA 1.14
Vertical Arching Factor, VAF 0.85
Radial Directed Earth Pressure, PRD
(psf)9376
Radial Directed Earth Pressure, PRD
(psi)65
S=PRD*DR/288
Pipe W all Compressive Stress, S (psi)553
Allowable Long-Term Compressive
Stress (psi)1000 Table 2-12
S<1000, so ok against wall crushing
Deflection of Pipe Using Watkins-Gaube Graph
Rf=(12*Es*(DR-1)^3)/E
Es=Ms*(1+m)*(1-2m)/(1-m)
es=wH/144/Es
DX/Dm=es*Df
Poisson ratio of bedding, m 0.3 Table 2-15, dense sand
Secant modulus of bedding, Es (psi)2101
3-in SDR 17 page 1 of 6
Rigidity Factor, Rf 3661
Deformation Factor, Df 1.5 look-up on Figure 2-6
Soil strain, es 3.6%
Ring Deflection, DX/Dm 5.5%
Deflection of Pipe Using Spangler's Modified Iowa Formula
DX/Dm=1/144(Kbed*LDL*PE)/((2*E/3)*(1/(DR-1))^3+(0.061Fs*E'))
Bedding Factor, Kbed 0.1 typical value
Deflection lag factor, LDL 1 typical value for plastic pipe
Vertical Soil Pressure, PE (psf)11000
Soil Support Factor, Fs 1 for very wide trenches (i.e. blanket embedment)
Modulus of Soil Reaction, E' (psi)3000 crushed rock with slight to high compaction
Ring Deflection, DX/Dm 4.1%
Constrained Buckling using Luscher Equation
PW C=5.65/N*sqrt(RB'*E'*E/(12*(DR-1)^3))
R=1-0.33*Hgw/H
B'=1/(1+4*e^(-0.065*H))
Safety Factor, N 2
height of ground water above pipe, Hgw
(ft)100
Buoyancy Reduction Factor, R 0.7
B'0.99687
Allowable Constrained Buckling
Pressure, PWC (psi)98
Vertical Soil Pressure (76 psi) < PW C, so ok against buckling
Constrained Buckling in Dry Ground using Moore-Selig Equation
PCR=2.4*Y*RH/DM*(E*I)^(1/3)*(E*s)^(2
/3)
E*s=ES/(1-m)
Calibration Factor, Y 0.55 for granular soil
Geometry Factor, RH 1 for deep uniform fills
Mean diameter, DM (in)3.29
Moment of Inertia, I (in^4/in)0.0007
E*s (psi)3000.907
Constrained Buckling Pressure, PCR
(psi)228
Factor of Safety against buckling 3.0
Ring Deflection less than 7.5% (as recommended by Plastic Pipe Institute PE pipe handbook for non-
pressurized pipe)
Ring Deflection less than 7.5% (as recommended by Plastic Pipe Institute PE pipe handbook for non-
pressurized pipe)
3-in SDR 17 page 2 of 6
Client:Uranium One Date:5/1/2008
Job:Shootaring Canyon Job No.:181692
Subject:Buried Pipe Calculations By:RTS
Calculations for PE3408 (black) HDPE pipe, IPS Dimensions
Nominal Diameter (in)8
Dimension Ratio, Do/t, DR 17
Outside Diameter, Do (in)8.625 Plastic Pipe Inst. PE pipe handbk
Inside Diameter (in)7.55 Plastic Pipe Inst. PE pipe handbk
Min W all Thickness, t (in)0.507 Plastic Pipe Inst. PE pipe handbk
Depth of Soil Cover, H (ft)110 cell design
Soil Density, w (pcf)100
Bedding Soil Compaction 90% Std. Proctor
Vertical Soil Pressure (psi)76.39
Compressive Ring Thrust (Wall Crushing) and Vertical Arching Factor
VAF=0.88-0.71*(SA-1)/(SA+2.5)
SA=1.43*Ms*rcent/E/t
PRD=VAF*w*H
Ms (psi)2828 Table 2-14, interpolate between 60 and 80 psi
rcent (in)4.04
Apparent Modulus of Elasticity, E (psi)28200 50-year value from Plastic Pipe Inst. PE pipe handbk
average cross-sectional area or wall
thickness for DR pipe, A (in)0.507
Hoop Thrust Stiffness Ratio, SA 1.14
Vertical Arching Factor, VAF 0.85
Radial Directed Earth Pressure, PRD
(psf)9372
Radial Directed Earth Pressure, PRD
(psi)65
S=PRD*DR/288
Pipe W all Compressive Stress, S (psi)553
Allowable Long-Term Compressive
Stress (psi)1000 Table 2-12
S<1000, so ok against wall crushing
Deflection of Pipe Using Watkins-Gaube Graph
Rf=(12*Es*(DR-1)^3)/E
Es=Ms*(1+m)*(1-2m)/(1-m)
es=wH/144/Es
DX/Dm=es*Df
Poisson ratio of bedding, m 0.3 Table 2-15, dense sand
Secant modulus of bedding, Es (psi)2101
8-in SDR 17 page 3 of 6
Rigidity Factor, Rf 3661
Deformation Factor, Df 1.5 look-up on Figure 2-6
Soil strain, es 3.6%
Ring Deflection, DX/Dm 5.5%
Deflection of Pipe Using Spangler's Modified Iowa Formula
DX/Dm=1/144(Kbed*LDL*PE)/((2*E/3)*(1/(DR-1))^3+(0.061Fs*E'))
Bedding Factor, Kbed 0.1 typical value
Deflection lag factor, LDL 1 typical value for plastic pipe
Vertical Soil Pressure, PE (psf)11000
Soil Support Factor, Fs 1 for very wide trenches (i.e. blanket embedment)
Modulus of Soil Reaction, E' (psi)3000 crushed rock with slight to high compaction
Ring Deflection, DX/Dm 4.1%
Constrained Buckling using Luscher Equation
PW C=5.65/N*sqrt(RB'*E'*E/(12*(DR-1)^3))
R=1-0.33*Hgw/H
B'=1/(1+4*e^(-0.065*H))
Safety Factor, N 2
height of ground water above pipe, Hgw
(ft)100
Buoyancy Reduction Factor, R 0.7
B'0.99687
Allowable Constrained Buckling
Pressure, PWC (psi)98
Vertical Soil Pressure (76 psi) < PW C, so ok against buckling
Constrained Buckling in Dry Ground using Moore-Selig Equation
PCR=2.4*Y*RH/DM*(E*I)^(1/3)*(E*s)^(2
/3)
E*s=ES/(1-m)
Calibration Factor, Y 0.55 for granular soil
Geometry Factor, RH 1 for deep uniform fills
Mean diameter, DM (in)8.12
Moment of Inertia, I (in^4/in)0.0109
E*s (psi)3000.907
Constrained Buckling Pressure, PCR
(psi)228
Factor of Safety against buckling 3.0
Ring Deflection less than 7.5% (as recommended by Plastic Pipe Institute PE pipe handbook for non-
pressurized pipe)
Ring Deflection less than 7.5% (as recommended by Plastic Pipe Institute PE pipe handbook for non-
pressurized pipe)
8-in SDR 17 page 4 of 6
Client:Uranium One Date:5/1/2008
Job:Shootaring Canyon Job No.:181692
Subject:Buried Pipe Calculations By:RTS
Calculations for PE3408 (black) HDPE pipe, IPS Dimensions
Nominal Diameter (in)12
Dimension Ratio, Do/t, DR 9
Outside Diameter, Do (in)12.75 Plastic Pipe Inst. PE pipe handbk
Inside Diameter (in)9.75 Plastic Pipe Inst. PE pipe handbk
Min W all Thickness, t (in)1.417 Plastic Pipe Inst. PE pipe handbk
Depth of Soil Cover, H (ft)110 cell design
Soil Density, w (pcf)100
Bedding Soil Compaction 90% Std. Proctor
Vertical Soil Pressure (psi)76.39
Compressive Ring Thrust (Wall Crushing) and Vertical Arching Factor
VAF=0.88-0.71*(SA-1)/(SA+2.5)
SA=1.43*Ms*rcent/E/t
PRD=VAF*w*H
Ms (psi)2828 Table 2-14, interpolate between 60 and 80 psi
rcent (in)5.63
Apparent Modulus of Elasticity, E (psi)28200 50-year value from Plastic Pipe Inst. PE pipe handbk
average cross-sectional area or wall
thickness for DR pipe, A (in)1.417
Hoop Thrust Stiffness Ratio, SA 0.57
Vertical Arching Factor, VAF 0.98
Radial Directed Earth Pressure, PRD
(psf)10776
Radial Directed Earth Pressure, PRD
(psi)75
S=PRD*DR/288
Pipe W all Compressive Stress, S (psi)337
Allowable Long-Term Compressive
Stress (psi)1000 Table 2-12
S<1000, so ok against wall crushing
Deflection of Pipe Using Watkins-Gaube Graph
Rf=(12*Es*(DR-1)^3)/E
Es=Ms*(1+m)*(1-2m)/(1-m)
es=wH/144/Es
DX/Dm=es*Df
Poisson ratio of bedding, m 0.3 Table 2-15, dense sand
Secant modulus of bedding, Es (psi)2101
Rigidity Factor, Rf 458
12-in SDR 9 page 5 of 6
Deformation Factor, Df 1 look up on Figure 2-6
Soil strain, es 3.6%
Ring Deflection, DX/Dm 3.6%
Deflection of Pipe Using Spangler's Modified Iow a Formula
DX/Dm=1/144(Kbed*LDL*PE)/((2*E/3)*(1/(DR-1))^3+(0.061Fs*E'))
Bedding Factor, Kbed 0.1 typical value
Deflection lag factor, LDL 1 typical value for plastic pipe
Vertical Soil Pressure, PE (psf)11000
Soil Support Factor, Fs 1 for very wide trenches (i.e. blanket embedment)
Modulus of Soil Reaction, E' (psi)2000 crushed rock with slight compaction
Ring Deflection, DX/Dm 4.8%
Constrained Buckling using Luscher Equation
PW C=5.65/N*sqrt(RB'*E'*E/(12*(DR-1)^3))
R=1-0.33*Hgw/H
B'=1/(1+4*e^(-0.065*H))
Safety Factor, N 2
height of ground water above pipe, Hgw
(ft)100
Buoyancy Reduction Factor, R 0.7
B'0.99687
Allowable Constrained Buckling
Pressure, PW C (psi)226
Vertical Soil Pressure (76 psi) < PW C, so ok against buckling
Constrained Buckling in Dry Ground using Moore-Selig Equation
PCR=2.4*Y*RH/DM*(E*I)^(1/3)*(E*s)^(2/
3)
E*s=ES/(1-m)
Calibration Factor, Y 0.55 for granular soil
Geometry Factor, RH 1 for deep uniform fills
Mean diameter, DM (in)11.33
Moment of Inertia, I (in^4/in)0.2371
E*s (psi)3000.907
Constrained Buckling Pressure, PCR
(psi)457
Factor of Safety against buckling 6.0
Ring Deflection less than 7.5% (as recommended by Plastic Pipe Institute PE pipe handbook for
non-pressurized pipe).
Ring Deflection less than 7.5% (as recommended by Plastic Pipe Institute PE pipe handbook for
non-pressurized pipe)
12-in SDR 9 page 6 of 6

APPENDIX G.5
LINER SYSTEM ANCHORAGE

Appendix G.5 1
APPENDIX G.5
Liner System Anchorage

1.0 INTRODUCTION
Anchorage of the liner system for the TSF will consist of conventional L-shaped anchor trenches. The
most conservative case was evaluated with a slope of 2H:1V used for the anchor trench design
calculations. The same liner anchorage design will be used for the Process Ponds liner system. The
Process Ponds have a slope of 3H:1V and the same general berm dimensions as the TSF. The typical
anchor trench details for the TSF and Process Ponds are provided on Drawing P1.10.

The two general anchor failure modes include an anchor pullout or an HDPE liner failure. The anchor
pullout will be considered the controlling condition. An anchor pullout will generally be an observable
occurrence, while there may be no evidence of a tension failure of one or both of the liners. The tensile
strength of one liner will be considered the critical (maximum) anchorage tension. The following methods
of evaluating and designing liner anchorage are presented in Koemer (2005b).

1.1 Anchor Trench Design Method
An anchor trench typically includes a runout section with a terminating anchor trench with the liner(s)
folded over the edge of the trench prior to backfill. The depth of the anchor trench then introduces another
variable into the design process. The formulation of the governing equation is very to similar to that of
liner runout with the addition of the earth pressures in the trench.

1.1.1 Summation of Forces
Koerner (2005b) presents a summation of horizontal forces for an anchor trench liner pullout as:

ΣFx = 0
Tallow cosβ = FUσ + FLσ + FLT –PA +PP

where the variables are as previously defined with the addition of:

PA = active earth pressure against the backfill side of the anchor trench; and
PP= passive earth pressure against the inside of the anchor trench.

1.1.2 Earth Pressure
The additional forces resisting liner pullout are the imposed by the passive and active earth pressure
within the anchor trench. Koemer (2005b) presents the calculation of these forces as:

PA = (0.5γ ATd AT + σn)KAdAT
PP = (0.5γ ATdAT + σn)KPdAT

Appendix G.5 2
where:
γAT = unit weight of soil in anchor trench
dAT = depth of the anchor trench
σn = applied normal stress from cover soil
KA = coefficient of active earth pressure = tan2(45 – φ/2)
KP = coefficient of passive earth pressure = tan2(45 + φ/2)
φ = angle of shearing resistance of respective soil

The resulting equation for determining liner pullout resistance has the design variables of cover thickness,
length of runout and trench depth. Since the equation can only be solved for one variable, the cover
thickness and length of runout are generally established as constants and the equation is solved for the
depth of the trench.

1.2 Anchor Trench Design
This section presents the anchor trench design for the top of the slopes for the tailings facility. The
minimum cover layer and steepest slope were used for the design. No cover soil will be placed over the
top of the liner runout. The interior slopes will be 2H:1V. In order to limit the potential for a tensile
failure in the liner, the pullout force will be limited to one-half of the available tensile strength.

1.2.1 Anchor Trench Calculation
The inputs for the calculation are as follows:

σallow = 2211 psi (calculated from minimum tensile strength break of HDPE)
t = 0.057 inch (57 mil)
Tallow = σallow t/2 = 126/2 = 63 lb/in (Yield Stress of Poly-Flex Textured HDPE from ASTM D
6693 from page 83 of Geosynthetics Specifier’s Guide 2008, IFAI publication, Volume 25,
Number 6, Dec 2007- Jan 2008, sheet attached)
β = 26.5 degrees (2H:1V sideslopes)
Unit weight of soil = 112 lb/ft3 (calculated as 90% of standard Proctor at optimum water content
for bulk Entrada Sand sample tested. Laboratory results attached in Appendix C.3.4)
σn= cover thickness x unit weight of soil = 0 (there will be no cover soil on top of the liner
runout)
δL = 9 degrees (interface friction angle between textured HDPE and geonet, minimum value given
in Koerner, 2005a)
δu = 0 degrees
LRO = 6 feet = 72 inches
γAT = 112 lb/ft3 = 0.065 lb/in3 (unit weight of soil in anchor trench)
φ = 32 degrees (Direct shear results for Entrada sandstone and weathered Entrada sandstone
samples remolded to 95% compaction at optimum water content had friction angles of 39 to 40
degrees. A conservative value of 32 degrees was chosen for the calculations. Laboratory results
are attached in Appendix C.4)
KA = tan2(45 – φ/2) = tan2(45 - 32/2) = 0.31
KP = tan2(45 + φ/2) = tan2(45 + 32/2) = 3.25

Appendix G.5 3

The required depth of anchor trench is calculated according to:

Tallow cos β = FUσ + FLσ + FLT - PA + PP

FUσ = σn tanδu (LRO) = (0)tan(0)(72) = 0
FLσ = σn tanδL (LRO) = (0)tan(9) (72) = 0
FUσ = Tallow sin β tan δL = (63)sin(26.5)tan(9) = 4.45 lb/in

PA = (0.5γATdAT + σn)KAdAT = (0.5(0.065)dAT +0)(0.31)dAT
PA = (0.01008) dAT2

PP = (0.5γATdAT + σn)KPdAT = (0.5(0.065)dAT +0)(3.0) dAT
PP = (0.1056 dAT2)

Tallow cos β = 63 cos(26.5) = 56.4 lb/in

56.4 =0 + 0 +4.45 - (0.010725 dAT2) + (0.0975 dAT2)

52.0 = 0.0955 dAT2

Solving the equation, the depth of the trench is determined to be:

dAT = 23.3 inches

A specified trench depth of 24 inches is sufficient to utilize one-half or more of the available tensile
strength for a single HDPE liner. Since there is no cover soil on top of the liner runout, the trench depth
is not dependent on liner runout. A trench depth of 24 inches will be sufficient for liner anchorage for the
Process Ponds which have a less steep slope than the TSF. Typical details for the anchor trenches for the
TSF and Process Ponds is provided on Drawing P1.10 of this report.

1.3 Summary and Conclusions
The specified trench depth of 24 inches is sufficient liner anchorage for both the TSF and Process Ponds.

2.0 REFERENCES
Geosynthetics Specifier’s Guide, 2008. Volume 25. Number 6. Page 83. December 2007-January 2008.

Koerner, G.K. and Narejo, D., 2005a. “Direct Shear Database of Geosynthetic to Geosynthetic and
Geosynthetic to Soil Interfaces,” Geosynthetic Research Institute, Report No.30.

Koerner, R.M., 2005b. Designing With Geosynthetics — Fifth Edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle
River, NJ.

APPENDIX G.6
LINER UPLIFT

Calculation Package
Liner Uplift Analysis
Introduction:
This calculation package has been prepared to evaluate the potential for wind uplift on the liner
system proposed for the tailings storage facility (TSF) and process water ponds at the Shootaring
Canyon Uranium Mill site (Shootaring). The proposed TSF has been designed with an exposed
geomembrane on the side slopes of the facility. The bottom of the TSF will be covered with 18
inches of gravel and 6 inches of sand to act as both a protective layer and a drainage layer for the
overlying tailings. The perimeter of the liner system will be secured in an anchor trench that will
restrain the edge of the liner system and prevent the introduction of wind under the liner.
However, the side slopes of the geomembrane will remain exposed until such time that the
tailings reach the top elevation of the liner. The process water ponds will be constructed in a
similar manner except that the bottom of the pond will be covered with and 18 inch of gravel
drainage layer.
Wind generated uplift (uplift) is a common occurrence on exposed geomembrane covers and
liner systems. Wind passing over a geomembrane results in a reduction in pressure at ground
level. The presence of side slopes or other obstructions under the geomembrane has been shown
to alter the pressure distribution along the geomembrane. Giroud, 1995 provided a detailed
discussion of this pressure distribution and a methodology by which the pressure distribution can
be estimated and used for designing the restraints and anchor system of the geomembrane.
These equations were further modified by Giroud and Zornberg (Zornberg, 1997) to take into
account the reduction in normal forces acting on geomembranes placed on a slope.
This calculation package evaluates the potential for uplift on the exposed geomembrane liner, as
well as the strength of the geomembrane with respect to tension developed by wind uplift and as
effected by temperature. Several methods of preventing uplift have been developed for exposed
geomembrane applications, including: strategic placement of weight on the geomembrane,
placement of a soil or liquid cover over the geomembrane, installation of intermediate anchor
trenches and the application of vacuum below the geomembrane. For purposes of this project,
only the strategic placement of weight on the geomembrane has been evaluated. Ultimately the
geomembrane will be covered by mill tailings that will hold the geomembrane in place.
Therefore, this calculation package will focus only on the ability of the liner to resist uplift and
prevent material failure of the liner system during temporary exposure to the design wind.
Additionally, calculations are provided to identify the spacing of supplemental weight on the
liner system to help resist uplift and to avoid shifting during uplift events.

This calculation package has been prepared by Mr. Erik Nelson, P.E. at Engineering Analytics,
Inc.
References:
Giroud, J.P., Pelte, T., and Bathurst, R.J., 1995, “Uplift of Geomembranes by Wind”,
Geosynthetics International, Vol. 2, No. 6, pp.897-952.
Hydro-Engineering, LLC, 2005, “Tailings Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan for
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Project, Garfield County, Utah”, December 2005, Revised
December 2006
Zornberg, J.G. and Giroud, J.P., 1997, “Uplift of Geomembranes by Wind – Extension of
Equations”, Geosynthetics International, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp 187-207.
Zornberg, J.G. and Giroud, J.P., 1999, “Errata for Uplift of Geomembranes by Wind – Extension
of Equations”, Geosynthetics International, Vol. 6, No. 6, pp 521-522.
Calculations:
Liner specifications were originally provided in the Tailings Reclamation and Decommissioning
Plan (Hydro-Engineering, 2005) and have been updated for the current Design Report. The
parameters used for design are provided as Attachment A.
Wind speed and temperature criteria were developed by reviewing the meteorological data from
two Remote Area Weather Stations located near the site, Kane Gulch and North Long Point.
Kane Gulch is located approximately 46 miles east southeast of the site and provided hourly
meteorological data from June 1991 through September 2008. North Long Point is located
approximately 48 miles east northeast of the site and provided meteorological data from August
1997 through September 2008. These two sites are the closest weather stations to the site that
have extended weather data. Data from these two sites were compiled and evaluated to identify
the temperature and wind speed trends for each month. Table 1 presents the average and
maximum sustained wind, wind gust and temperature for each site for each month over which
data was available. The highest temperature, and maximum wind gust speed from either site was
then compiled to create a monthly design temperature and wind speed. Table 2 presents the
design wind speed and temperature.
Wind uplift was then calculated for each month using the design wind speed and temperature
data in Table 2.
The average site elevation is approximately 1350 m above sea level.

The average atmospheric pressure at an elevation of 1350 m is 86,175 Pa as interpolated from
values provided by Giroud, 1995 (pg, 902)
Calculate Uplift Potential:
Based on the above values the maximum change in pressure expected to be generated by the
design wind is calculated by equation (9) (Giroud, 1995)
∆pR = 0.050 V2e-(1.252x10-4)z
Where V = Wind velocity (km/h)
And z = elevation in meters
Table 3 presents the maximum pressure change for each month.
This value represents the maximum uplift that could be experienced by the liner system.
However, depending on the liners location within the TSF the actual wind suction will be
reduced by the suction factor to provide a realistic distribution of suction forces within the
facility. The following table presents the suction factors for each area evaluated.
Location Suction Factor (λ) (1)
Slopes (full face) 0.7
Bottom 0.4
(1) Per Giroud, 1995
Table 3 presents the factored loads for that portion of the geomembrane that will be exposed on
the side slopes. Since the bottom portion of the liner will be covered by the drainage and sand
layers temperature effects on that portion of the liner will be negligible and therefore are not
calculated on a monthly basis.
Check Uplift on Bottom Liner:
Weight of soil on bottom liner = 2 ft x 130 pcf = 260 psf (12,448 Pa)
Maximum possible uplift at maximum design wind speed (78 mph) = 665.3 Pa
Factored uplift = Max Uplift x 0.4 = 266.12 Pa
The factored uplift value is much less than the combined weight of the drainage and sand layers
on the liner, therefore, no uplift is expected on the bottom liner.

Check Uplift on Side Slope Liner:
Slope angle for 2:1 slope = 26.56° (maximum slope)
From the Design Drawings the maximum length of exposed geomembrane along the slope =
152 ft. (46.2 m).
From the HDPE material manufacturer’s specifications (see attachment to Appendix F.3):
Liner thickness = 57 mil – 1.45 mm
Allowable tension at yield Tall = 126 lb/in of width (22.07 kN/m)
Allowable strain at yield εall = 12 percent
Density of HDPE = 0.94 g/cm3
Weight of geomembrane = 0.145cm x 0.94 g/cm3 = 0.136g/cm2 = 1.36 kg/m2
Effective Suction Se = (∆pR x λ) – (9.81x wt. geomembrane x cos (slope angle)) Equation A-41
(Zornberg, 1997). Calculated values for effective suction (Se), SeL, and normalized liner tension
(T’all) are presented in Table 3.
Allowable tension values (Tall) will vary depending on the temperature of the liner material.
Figure 23 from (Giroud, 1995) presents a graphical depiction of maximum allowable tension at
yield vs. temperature and strain at yield. It should be noted that Giroud’s data was based on
empirical data and is therefore slightly higher than the maximum yield stress and strain reported
by the manufacturer. This is because the values presented by the manufacturer represent the
lower allowable limit of yield stress and strain that is acceptable for a given liner material.
Temperature vs. yield stress curves were not available from the liner manufacturers. Therefore,
for purposes of this study, an additional curve has been added to Figure 23 that has been adjusted
to correspond to the manufacturer’s minimum yield stress/strain values at the appropriate ASTM
test temperature of 23 °C. This adjusted curve provides stress/strain values that are more
consistent, and therefore more conservative, than those reported in the original Figure 23.
Table 3 presents the calculated normalized stress for the liner material at the maximum wind gust
speed and temperature for each month.
Per Table 2 (Giroud, 1995) T/SeL at yield strain varies from 0.66 to 0.69. The calculated value
of T’all is greater than the T/SeL for all months. Therefore is can be concluded that the liner is
strong enough to withstand the tension generated by the wind uplift without yielding. Back
calculations based on the previously described methodology indicates that the proposed

geomembrane will be able to withstand the maximum design wind gust of 78 mph up to a
temperature of approximately 150 °F (65°C).
Calculation of Supplemental Restraints:
Although the above calculations indicate that the liner is capable of withstanding the uplift forces
generated by the design wind, it would be undesirable to have the liner along an entire side of the
TSF lifted off its underlayment. Potential problems associated with allowing unrestrained uplift
include shifting and wrinkling of the liner or uncontrolled flapping of the liner which could result
in failure due to fatigue. Therefore the addition of supplemental weight to the surface of the
exposed geomembrane on the side slopes is recommended to help retain the liner system in
place. Although several different types of restrait systems are available, the primary method of
restraint analyzed for this application is the addition of weight on top of the liner. The use of
sand bags was analyzed to keep the liner in place however, it was calculated that 70 lb sandbags
would need to be placed every 2 to 3 feet to keep the liner in place. Therefore, the weight will be
added either by filling an HDPE tube or corrugated HDPE culvert with soil and laying the
tube/culvert on the liner from top to bottom.
Weight spacing was calculated as follows:
Maximum uplift on Liner = 463 Pa = 9.67 lb/ft2
Therefore, the weight of the supplemental restraints is calculated by:
Wsup = 9.67 x S
Where S is the distance between the restraints.
Spacing of Restraints, S (ft.) Weight per linear foot (lb) Equivalent Culvert ID (in)
50 483 26
75 725 32
100 967 37

Process Water Ponds:
Uplift potential on the exposed portions of the process water pond liners was also evaluated
using the same methods described above. The south and north process water ponds were
evaluated separately since the length of exposed geomembrane in each pond is different. The
South Process Water Pond has a maximum exposed length of geomembrane of approximately

88 feet, located at the corners of the pond. The slope of the liner at that location is
approximately 3.7:1 (horizontal:vertical). The North Process Water Pond has a maximum
exposed length of geomembrane of approximately 47 feet located at the corner of the pond. The
slope at that location is approximately 3.2:1. The liner materials, methods of construction, and
anchoring systems will be the same as those used for the TSF, therefore, the calculations
described above are essentially the same with the exception that the exposed length of
geomembrane and slope are different. Tables 4 and 5 present the results of those calculations
using the maximum temperature and wind speed for each month of the year. Based on those
calculations, the stress generated in the process water pond liners by wind uplift is significantly
less than the yield stress of the liner material.
Conclusions:
Based on the calculations performed as part of this package, the exposed portions of the 60 mil
HDPE geomembrane liner will be capable of withstanding the design wind speeds and maximum
recorded temperatures without tearing or pulling apart, provided the anchoring system is capable
of withstanding the tension forces generated by the uplift. A supplemental restraint system is
recommended for the exposed portions of the TSF geomembranes to help maintain the
positioning of the exposed liner. The supplemental restraints are important in that they will
reduce the likelihood of stress increases in the liner due to shifting or uneven deformation of the
liner. The process water ponds do not require supplemental restraints because the length of the
exposed slope is significantly less than the TSF liner.
Table 1
Summary of Meterological Data
Summary of Monthly Remote Area Weather Station Data
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Tailings Storage Facility
North Long Point
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
Max. Wind Speed (mph) 19 19 17 21 18 19 13 14 15 18 17 17
Avg. Wind Speed (mph) 3.1 3.4 3.2 4.1 3.5 3.4 2.3 2.1 2.6 3.1 3.0 2.7
Max. Wind Gust (mph) 48 54 47 49 47 44 38 39 41 44 44 39
Avg. Wind Gust (mph) 10.1 11.2 11.0 13.1 11.9 11.6 9.3 8.5 9.6 10.3 10.0 9.2
Max. Temp. (Deg. F) 81 81 95 90 97 90 105 93 91 88 79 82
Avg. Temp. (Deg. F) 29.6 31.7 37.9 44.0 52.1 60.7 68.0 63.4 56.3 45.6 36.1 28.7
Kane Gulch
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
Max. Wind Speed (mph) 17 27 22 28 22 23 23 20 20 22 20 22
Avg. Wind Speed (mph) 3.2 3.6 4.2 5.1 5.0 5.2 4.4 4.0 4.1 3.8 3.4 3.2
Max. Wind Gust (mph) 47 51 54 52 54 56 50 44 58 57 77 78
Avg. Wind Gust (mph) 8.4 9.3 10.8 13.0 11.9 11.5 11.5 11.2 9.7 9.8 9.0 8.5
Max. Temp. (Deg. F) 63 67 82 85 96 99 104 101 96 86 74 63
Avg. Temp. (Deg. F) 28.8 32.8 40.2 46.4 57.7 66.7 73.5 71.4 61.7 48.5 35.7 28.4
Table 2
Summary of Monthly Maximum Weather Data
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Tailings Storage Facility
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
Max. Wind Speed (mph) 19 27 22 28 22 23 23 20 20 22 20 22
Avg. Wind Speed (mph) 3.2 3.6 4.2 5.1 5.0 5.2 4.4 4.0 4.1 3.8 3.4 3.2
Max. Wind Gust (mph) 48.0 54 54 52 54 56 50 44 58 57 77 78
Avg. Wind Gust (mph) 10.1 11.2 11.0 13.1 11.9 11.6 11.5 11.2 9.7 10.3 10.0 9.2
Max. Temp. (Deg. F) 81 81 95 90 97 99 105 101 96 88 79 82
Avg. Temp. (Deg. F) 29.6 32.8 40.2 46.4 57.7 66.7 73.5 71.4 61.7 48.5 36.1 28.7
Max. Temp. (Deg. C) 27.2 27.2 35 32.2 36.1 37.2 40.6 38.3 35.6 31.1 26.1 27.8
Table 3
Summary of Monthly Uplift Calculations
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Tailings Storage Facility
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
Uplift Potential
∆pR=0.05 V2e-(1.252x10-4)z
z (meters) 1350
∆pR 251.95 318.88 318.88 295.7 318.88 342.94 273.39 211.71 367.87 355.29 648.37 665.32
Suction Factor (λ) 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7
Wind Suction (Sw) = ∆pR*λ 176.37 223.22 223.22 206.99 223.22 240.06 191.37 148.2 257.51 248.71 453.86 465.72
Effective Suction (S e)
slope (s) 26.56
mass of liner (ml) (kg/m2) 1.36
Se = Sw - 9.81*ml *cos(s) 174.46 221.31 221.31 205.08 221.31 238.15 189.46 146.29 255.6 246.8 451.95 463.81
Length (L) (m) 43.89
Se*L (kN/m) 7.657 9.7132 9.7132 9.0009 9.7132 10.452 8.3155 6.4207 11.218 10.832 19.836 20.357
Allowable Tension (Tall) @23°C 22 Per Giroud 1995, Use Tall at Yield
Tall @ Max Temp. 21.3 21.3 19.7 20.1 19.5 19.2 18.6 19.1 19.6 20.6 21.5 21.2
Yield Percent (ε) @ Max Temp. 12.3 12.3 13 12.9 13.1 13.2 13.4 13.3 13.1 12.6 12.2 12.3
Normalized Tension (T'all)
T'all = Tall/SeL @ Max Temp 2.7818 2.1929 2.0282 2.2331 2.0076 1.8369 2.2368 2.9748 1.7471 1.9018 1.0839 1.0414
Min T'all 0.68 0.68 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.66 0.67 0.67 0.68 0.69 0.69
Table 4
Summary of Monthly Uplift Calculations
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Mill - South Process Water Pond
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
Uplift Potential
∆pR=0.05 V2e-(1.252x10-4)z
z (meters) 1350
∆pR 251.95 318.88 318.88 295.7 318.88 342.94 273.39 211.71 367.87 355.29 648.37 665.32
Suction Factor (λ) 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7
Wind Suction (Sw) = ∆pR*λ 176.37 223.22 223.22 206.99 223.22 240.06 191.37 148.2 257.51 248.71 453.86 465.72
Effective Suction (S e)
slope (s) 15.12
mass of liner (ml) (kg/m2) 1.36
Se = Sw - 9.81*ml *cos(s) 187.5 234.3 234.3 218.1 234.3 251.2 202.5 159.3 268.6 259.8 465.0 476.8
Length (L) (m) 26.7
Se*L (kN/m) 5.01 6.26 6.26 5.82 6.26 6.71 5.41 4.25 7.17 6.94 12.41 12.73
Allowable Tension (Tall) @23°C 22 Per Giroud 1995, Use Tall at Yield
Tall @ Max Temp. 21.3 21.3 19.7 20.1 19.5 19.2 18.6 19.1 19.6 20.6 21.5 21.2
Yield Percent (ε) @ Max Temp. 12.3 12.3 13 12.9 13.1 13.2 13.4 13.3 13.1 12.6 12.2 12.3
Normalized Tension (T'all)
T'all = Tall/SeL @ Max Temp 4.2554 3.4046 3.1488 3.4519 3.1169 2.8631 3.4406 4.4906 2.7329 2.9696 1.7319 1.6652
Min T'all 0.68 0.68 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.66 0.67 0.67 0.68 0.69 0.69
Table 5
Summary of Monthly Uplift Calculations
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Mill - North Process Water Pond
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
Uplift Potential
∆pR=0.05 V2e-(1.252x10-4)z
z (meters) 1350
∆pR 251.95 318.88 318.88 295.7 318.88 342.94 273.39 211.71 367.87 355.29 648.37 665.32
Suction Factor (λ) 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7
Wind Suction (Sw) = ∆pR*λ 176.37 223.22 223.22 206.99 223.22 240.06 191.37 148.2 257.51 248.71 453.86 465.72
Effective Suction (S e)
slope (s) 17.35
mass of liner (ml) (kg/m2) 1.36
Se = Sw - 9.81*ml *cos(s) 175.4 222.3 222.3 206.0 222.3 239.1 190.4 147.2 256.6 247.8 452.9 464.8
Length (L) (m) 14.28
Se*L (kN/m) 2.50 3.17 3.17 2.94 3.17 3.41 2.72 2.10 3.66 3.54 6.47 6.64
Allowable Tension (Tall) @23°C 22 Per Giroud 1995, Use Tall at Yield
Tall @ Max Temp. 21.3 21.3 19.7 20.1 19.5 19.2 18.6 19.1 19.6 20.6 21.5 21.2
Yield Percent (ε) @ Max Temp. 12.3 12.3 13 12.9 13.1 13.2 13.4 13.3 13.1 12.6 12.2 12.3
Normalized Tension (T'all)
T'all = Tall/SeL @ Max Temp 8.5031 6.7109 6.2068 6.8316 6.1437 5.6232 6.8402 9.0835 5.3498 5.8226 3.3243 3.1942
Min T'all 0.68 0.68 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.66 0.67 0.67 0.68 0.69 0.69
z
0
Cl)
ci)
a)
C
C”
Eci)
E
0ci)
CD
Geomembrane strain,e (%)
Figure 23.Curves representing a typical relationship between yield tension and yield strain
of 1.0 and 1.5 mm thick HDPE geomembranes (from Giroud 1994)plotted on the same graph
as the family of curves representing the uplift tension-strain relationship (from Figure 13).
Value of Se L (kN/m)along each curve
4r
tGM 1.5mm
4.
30
20
10
tGM~lmm
~1f~4l~6 -‘-~-‘~
~~~
A~~3~C ~i-z~*W/’~~
Geomembrane
temperature
(°C)
0 5 10 15 20
GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL •1995,VOL.2,NO.6 939

Attachment A

pulled off of the seamby the squeeze-out,the weld is considered unacceptable.If
the seaming process is interrupted during mid-seaming,the extrudate should trail
off gradually and not in a large mass of solidified extrudate.Where such welds
are abandoned long enough to cool,a new patch strip shall be placed over the
entire existing patch.No extrusion welds will be permitted over the top of
another extrusion weld or side-by-side of another weld.The only cases that
extrudate will be allowed over the top of another weld is for “T”or “Y”shaped
seams after the existing weld has been grouiid.In the event an extrusion weld
cannot be tested with a vacuum box,provisions must be provided for the seamto
be spark tested according to the spark tester manufacturer’s procedures.
TABLE 3-Material Properties for IIDPE Geomembrane
Minimum
Property Test Method Requirement
Thickness (mils minimum ±10%)ASTMD 5199 60
Speóiflc Gravity (gfcc minimum)ASTMD 150511)792 0.94
Carbon Black Content (%)ASTM D 1603 2-3
Carbon Black Dispersion ASTMD 5596 Note 1
Minimum Tensile Strength (each direction)ASTM])6693
1.Tensile strength yield (lb/in,width)126
2.Tensile strength break (lb/in,width)228
3.Elongation at yield (%)12
4.Elongation at break (%)700
Tear Strength (lb.)ASTMD 1004 42
Puncture Resistance FIMS 101 -2065 80
ASTMD 4833 108
Stress Crack Resistance2 (hrs)ASTMD 5397 300
Oxidalive Induction Time (OIT)(minutes)ASTMD 3895 100
Oven Aging at 85 °C ASTh{D 5721 55
Standard Off-%retained after 90 days ASTMI)3895
UV Resistance3 GIU GM1 1 50
Nigh Pressure On’4-%retained after 1600 ASTMD 5885
hrs
Carbon b]ack dispersion for 10 different views:Nine in Categories 1 and 2 with one allowed
in Categoiy 3.~The yield stress used to calculate the applied load for the SP-NCTL test should be the mean
value via MQC testing.
~3)The condition of the test should be 20 hr.TJV cycle at 75°C followed by 4 hr.condensation at
60°C.
~4~UV resistance is based on percent retained value regardless of original NP-On’value.
21
C:\ed\projects~2007-50~TMP\ThXT\AppC-O7.doc
Apill 2007

APPENDIX H
SURFACE WATER HYDROLOGY AND EROSION PROTECTION
CALCULATIONS

APPENDIX H.1
DRAINAGE CHANNEL DESIGN CALCULATIONS
Page 1 of 8
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:Hydrology and Hydraulic Design Assumptions/Equations APPROVED: SHEET:
Catchment Area and Hydrology:
Catchment boundaries were delineated in AutoCAD, based on contours from 1"=200' scale aerial photogrammetry.
Design flows were computed with the Rational Method, using Kirpich's formula for time of concentration.
Time of concentration is accumulated downstream based on the maximum of the current subcatchment
Tc (by Kirpich's formula), or the sum of the relevant previous Tc plus the in-channel travel time, Tt.
Rainfall intensity is linearly interpolated from IDF table values.
The Probable Maximum Precipitation IDF curve was derived from the procedure in NUREG/CR-4620, where:
PMP rainfall depth = (% PMP) x (PMP)
Using the 1-hour, 1 square mile local storm PMP.
i = intensity (in/hr) = [ rainfall depth (inches) x 60 ] / [ rainfall duration (minutes) ]
Kirpich's formula:Tc = 60 * 11.9 L3 / H0.385
Where:
Tc =Time of concentration, minutes
L = Flow length, miles
H = Basin relief, feet
Rational Method:Qp = C I A
Where:
Qp =Peak flow, cfs
C = Runoff coefficient, conservatively assumed to be 0.90
I =Rainfall intensity (for duration equal to Tc), in/hr
A = Drainage area, acres
Travel time in channel:Tt = Lchl / ( 60 V )
Where:
Tt =Travel time in channel, minutes
Lchl =Length of channel, feet
V = Full-flow velocity, ft/sec
Certain channels near the process ponds and TSF are designed for the Probable Maximum Flood,
because overtopping of those channel banks could enter the process ponds or TSF, and cause overtopping
of the process pond or TSF embankment, discharging contaminated material to the environment.
Diversion channels near the process ponds and atop the east bluff are only designed for the PMF to the most
downstream point at which failure would result in additional discharge to the process ponds or TSF.
Beyond that point, the channels are designed for the 100-year runoff.
Channels sized for the PMF utilized a 100-year design for riprap lining. Both analyses are presented in the calc-
-ulations, with PMF design status indicated both in the first column of the table and on the drainage area maps.
11/20/2008
114-181692
Drainage_Shootaring.xls | Assumptions & Equations 11/20/2008 4:55 PM
Page 2 of 8
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:Hydrology and Hydraulic Design Assumptions/Equations APPROVED: SHEET:
11/20/2008
114-181692
100-year IDF curve (NOAA Atlas 14 100-year IDF curve (NOAA Atlas 14
(min)(hours) (days)
0 0 0 5.66 2.5 27.5 2.2825 54.78
5 0.083 0.003 5.66 5 45 3.735 44.82
10 0.167 0.007 4.31 10 62 5.146 30.876
15 0.25 0.010 3.56 15 74 6.142 24.568
30 0.5 0.021 2.4 20 82 6.806 20.418
60 1 0.042 1.48 30 89 7.387 14.774
120 2 0.083 0.85 45 95 7.885 10.513333
180 3 0.125 0.57 60 100 8.3 8.3
360 6 0.25 0.3
720 12 0.5 0.16 1-hr, 1-mi2 PMP =8.3 inches
1440 24 1 0.1
2880 48 2 0.06
5760 96 4 0.03
10080 168 7 0.02
14400 240 10 0.02
28800 480 20 0.01
43200 720 30 0.01
64800 1080 45 0.01
86400 1440 60 0
% of 1-hr
PMP Depth (in)Storm Duration I (in/hr) I (in/hr)
Duration
(min)
Drainage_Shootaring.xls | Assumptions & Equations 11/20/2008 4:55 PM
Page 3 of 8
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:Hydrology and Hydraulic Design Assumptions/Equations APPROVED: SHEET:
11/20/2008
114-181692
Non-contributing Areas:
Offsite area OS1-1 drains to a natural sump, which overflows to both the north and
south, depending on the accumulated water elevation. Based on contour end areas, it stores 2.18 ac-ft
of water at elevation 4498, and 7.68 ac-ft at elevation 4500.
Overflow to the north occurs via a small pass, at an elevation between 4498 and 4500. Overflow to the south
occurs over a long berm at an elevation above 4500, and would only occur if peak flows are sufficiently high
that water builds up to the southern overflow elevation, rather than all overflow occurring to the north.
Overflow to the south would thus only occur if runoff volume exceeded 7.68 ac-ft, and if the northern overflow were
sufficiently constricted that water accumulated above the southern overflow elevation during peak flow
conditions.
No hydrograph routing was performed to determine the relative effects of the two overflow elevations, but a simple
volume-based analysis confirms that OS1-1/OS2-1 is non-contributing for the 100-year event:
Given a contributing area of 23.21 acres, a rainfall intensity of 5.11 in/hr, a duration equal to the time of
concentration of 7.04 minutes, and C=0.90, the Rational Method 100-year runoff volume is 1.18 ac-ft.
Alternatively, the 100-year, 24-hour rainfall is 2.4". Again assuming C=0.90, the 100-year runoff volume is
4.18 ac-ft. Either computed volume is significantly less than the 7.68 ac-ft at elevation 4500, which is at
or slightly below the point at which the sump overflows to the south.
Therefore, OS1-1/OS2-1 can be safely considered non-contributing for the 100-year design event.
For the PMP (for freeboard determination), the sump was assumed to store 7.68 ac-ft, and discharge the
remaining volume to the TSF, conservatively neglecting any offsite discharge to the north.
The areas between the cross-valley berm, divider berm, and upper cross-valley berm, denoted OS1-3,
OS1-4, and OS1-5 also have storage capacity, which was credited toward PMF volume calculations
for the TSF freeboard determination. Details can be found in the freeboard calculations.
Drainage_Shootaring.xls | Assumptions & Equations 11/20/2008 4:55 PM
Page 4 of 8
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:Hydrology and Hydraulic Design Assumptions/Equations APPROVED: SHEET:
11/20/2008
114-181692
Channel Hydraulics:
Channel hydraulics are computed using Manning's equation for trapezoidal channels:
Vavg = ( 1.486 R2/3 S1/2 ) / n A = B y + z y2
Q = Vavg A P = ( B y + z y2 ) / ( B + 2 y (z2 + 1)0.5 )
R = A / P T = B + 2 z y
Where:
Q = Design discharge, cfs
Vavg =Average Velocity, ft/sec
A =Cross-sectional Area of flow, ft2
B = Bottom width, ft
y = Flow depth, ft
P = Wetted perimeter, ft
R = Hydraulic radius, ft
z = Side slope ratio, ft H : ft V
S = Bed slope, ft/ft
n = Manning's roughness
T = Top width, ft
Manning's n was assigned according to the channel bed material.
Bare earth or gravel was assigned n = 0.035; and heavy riprap was assigned n = 0.08 for small flow depths and
n = 0.045 for larger flow depths. Additional detail, such as the use of a split range of n-values for capacity
versus erosion protection, was not justified at this design level.
Calculations for diversions, rundowns, and rundown chutes used slopes of 0.003, 0.01, and 0.40, respectively,
except where steeper slopes were required to transition to an outfall elevation.
Hydraulic calculations for mill drainage ditches located on the mill site atop the bluff used a minimum
slope of 0.005, with steeper slopes utilized as-needed to match terrain slopes. Mill drainage ditches in
steeper areas used a design slope approximating the existing grade.
Ditches M1-2, M1-3, M1-4, M1-5, M1-8, and M1-21 incorporate short sections of steeper slopes (typically 2%),
to better match existing grades and minimize cut. The critical slope for capacity (0.5%) is shown in the
calculations. Due to small design flows, 2.0% sections usually do not require any increased lining D50.
Note that both drainage area and flow cross-sectional area are both denoted as the variable A, by convention.
The context in which each is used should provide sufficient indication of which is under discussion.
Drainage_Shootaring.xls | Assumptions & Equations 11/20/2008 4:55 PM
Page 5 of 8
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:Hydrology and Hydraulic Design Assumptions/Equations APPROVED: SHEET:
11/20/2008
114-181692
Hydraulic Residence Time:
Hydraulic residence time provides an indication of the possible contact time for potentially contaminated mill
site runoff to infiltrate through ditch bottoms before entering the lined tailings area.
Residence times are accumulated by taking the maximum time entering a junction at the head of a channel,
and adding the time for the channel in question, in a similar fashion to the summation of Tc's.
Hydraulic residence time is computed as the channel volume, divided by the design flow rate:
Volume = Achl * Lchl
Tres = Volume / ( 60 Q )
Where:
Volume =Volume of channel reach, ft3
Tres =Hydraulic residence time, min
All other variables are as defined above.
Type Lchl (ft)Discharge,
Q100 (cfs)
Area, Achl
(ft2)
Volume
(ft3)
Increm.
Tres (min)
Cum. Tres
(min)
Mill to TSF
M1-18(upper) mill 250 9.2 2.0 496 0.9 0.9
M1-18(lower) mill 687 9.2 2.6 1770 3.2 4.1
M1-17 mill 607.5 21.7 4.4 2681 2.1 6.2
M1-14(upper) mill 102.59 41.1 6.2 639 0.3 6.4
M1-14(lower) mill 393 41.1 14.1 5555 2.3 8.7
M1-13 mill 427 58.4 18.6 7949 2.3 10.9
M1-12 mill 430 5.4 3.4 1469 4.5 4.5
M1-11 mill 35 5.4 1.0 33 0.1 4.6
M1-10 mill 184 7.2 3.5 648 1.5 1.5
M1-8 mill 489 21.6 7.8 3831 3.0 7.6
M1-7 mill 312 11.5 5.9 1839 2.7 2.7
M1-6(upper) chute 68.13 30.1 3.9 269 0.1 7.7
M1-6(middle) chute 55.31 30.1 7.4 407 0.2 7.9
M1-6(lower) chute 89.99 30.1 5.3 473 0.3 8.2
M1-1E mill 626 86.5 15.7 9802 1.9 12.8
M1-1D mill 181 92.0 12.4 2238 0.4 13.2
M1-3 mill 690 7.6 3.6 2496 5.5 5.5
M1-2 mill 957 17.0 6.6 6275 6.1 11.6
M1-4 mill 458 9.0 4.1 1872 3.5 3.5
M1-1A(upper) chute 59.87 22.4 5.8 346 0.3 15.4
M1-1A(middle) chute 202.55 22.4 3.4 689 0.5 15.9
M1-1A(lower) chute 57.85 22.4 16.5 956 0.7 16.6
M1-1C mill 143 103.6 12.2 1742 0.3 16.9
Residence time does not exceed 20 min. along any possible flow route from the mill to the TSF.
Location / ID #
Drainage_Shootaring.xls | Assumptions & Equations 11/20/2008 4:55 PM
Page 6 of 8
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:Hydrology and Hydraulic Design Assumptions/Equations APPROVED: SHEET:
11/20/2008
114-181692
Channel lining / Erosion Control
Riprap is designed using the Corps of Engineers' method, from EM-1110-2-1601 (updated 30 June 1994).
D30 = Sf CS CV CT d [ ( γw / ( γs - γw ) )1/2 V / ( K1 g d )1/2 ]2.5 From EM 1110-2-1601, Equation 3-3.
Where:
Sf =Safety factor, assumed to be the minimum value of 1.1 due to conservative assumptions elsewhere.
CS =Stability coefficient for incipient failure, assumed to be 0.375 for rounded rock (0.30 for angular)
CV =Vertical velocity distribution coefficient, 1.0 for straight channels; 1.283 - 0.2 log (R/W) outside of bends.
CT = Thickness coefficient, 1.0 for thickness of 1.5*D50.
d = Local flow depth, ft. Same as y in notation followed above; d is Corps' notation.
γw =Unit weight of water, 62.4 lb/ft3.
γs =Unit weight of rock, conservatively assumed to be 150 lb/ft3.
V =Local depth-averaged velocity, ft/s. Use VSS for side-slope riprap. Velocities in a straight channel
having equal bottom and side slope roughness range from 10 to 20% greater than VAVG;
conservatively used V = 1.2*VAVG for computing channel bottom riprap size.
K1 =Side slope correction factor, K1 = ( 1 - sin2θ / sin2φ )0.5 From EM 1110-2-1601, Equation 3-4.
g =Gravitational constant, 32.2 ft/sec2.
θ = Side slope angle, tan
-1(1/z), degrees.
φ =Riprap angle of repose, assumed to be 40 degrees.
And,
VSS / VAVG = 1.74 - 0.52 log ( R / W )From EM 1110-2-1601, Plate B-33.
Where:
VSS =Depth-averaged velocity at 20% up slope length from toe, ft/sec.
VAVG =Average velocity in channel, ft/sec (from hydraulic calculations above).
R = Bend radius at channel centerline, ft.
W = Flow top width, ft.
D50 is related to D30 by the equation D50 = D30 ( D85 / D15 )1/3
The ratio D85 / D15 typically ranges from 1.7 to 2.7, implying that D50 / D30 ranges from 1.2 to 1.4.
Conservatively assume D50 = 1.4 D30.
Lumping coefficients, D50/D30 Sf CS CT [ ( γw / ( γs - γw ) )1/2 ]2.5 =
=1.4 * 1.1 * 0.375 * 1.0 * [ 62.4 / ( 150 - 62.4 )]1.25
= 0.3779
CV, V, d, and K1 are determined individually for each channel.
Drainage_Shootaring.xls | Assumptions & Equations 11/20/2008 4:55 PM
Page 7 of 8
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:Hydrology and Hydraulic Design Assumptions/Equations APPROVED: SHEET:
11/20/2008
114-181692
Equation 3-3, above, is strictly applicable for slopes up to 2%. For steeper channels, Eqn. 3-5 from the Corps'
manual provides a check. That equation is below:
D30 = 1.95 S0.555 q2/3 / g1/3 From EM 1110-2-1601, Equation 3-5.
Where:
S = Slope of bed, ft/ft.
q = Unit discharge, Q / B, times a flow concentration factor of 1.25 (greater for skewed approach flow).
Eqn 3-5 is applicable for thickness = 1.5 D100, angular rock, unit weight of 167 pcf, slopes from 2 to 20%,
and side slopes flatter than 2.5:1.
Because the present application assumes a layer thickness of 1.5 D50, rounded rock, unit weight 150 pcf,
correction factors must be applied:
Correction for unit weight, C1 = 1.22 (from Plate B-38)
Correction for rounded rock = 0.375 / 0.30 = 1.25 (based on stability coefficients above)
Assume no correction for layer thickness, as gradation is not yet established. Provide 1.5*D50 layer.
For channels steeper than 2%, the greater of the results from Eqns. 3.3 and 3.5 were used.
For channels 2% and flatter, the result from Eqn. 3.3 was used (maximum of channel bottom or side values).
Where computed values were over, but close, to nominal sizes, the lower nominal size was used where it was
judged safe. Given the conservative assumptions of rock unit weight, roundedness, and high runoff
coefficients, minor rounding of numbers was considered acceptable.
Grouted riprap was called for where the computed rock size was considered unacceptably large for ungrouted rock.
Shear stress was computed for comparison with other riprap design methods, if desired:
τ = γw y S
Where:
τ = Bed shear, lb/ft
2, and
γw , y, S are as defined above R / W
Kb
Use of y instead of R leads to a conservative estimate of shear stress. 2 2.00
3 1.85
Bed shear in bends is modified by the bend ratio, Kb (tabulated to the right):4 1.70
τb = Kb τ 5 1.56
6 1.43
Where:7 1.31
τb =Bed shear at outside of bend, lb/ft2 8 1.20
Kb = Bend coefficient, and 9 1.12
τ, R, W are as defined above.10 1.05
Bend R / W values were generally assumed to be high (i.e., no bend effects); during final design actual values
will be computed, and larger rock provided at specific bends as needed.
Drainage_Shootaring.xls | Assumptions & Equations 11/20/2008 4:55 PM
Page 8 of 8
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:Hydrology and Hydraulic Design Assumptions/Equations APPROVED: SHEET:
11/20/2008
114-181692
Culvert Design:
All culverts are to be smooth-interior HDPE or concrete, with Manning's roughness, n = 0.012.
Culverts were designed for inlet control, with a maximum Headwater to Depth (HW/D) ratio of 1.5, or the
available ditch depth.
The entrance condition was assumed to be grooved end projecting.
Final design will incorporate HY-8 analysis, and consider outlet control.
Culvert
I.D.
Design
Discharge
Q (cfs)
Available
Headwater,
HW (ft)
Diameter, D
(ft)
Diameter,
D (in)
HW/D
Avail.
HW/D
Used Slope (%)Qfull (cfs)
W1-14 44.9 4.00 3.0 36 1.33 1.33 0.30 40
W1-19 75.1 5.75 4.0 48 1.44 1.44 0.30 85
E1-2 17.5 3.25 2.5 30 1.30 1.30 0.30 24
E1-7 27.0 3.75 2.5 30 1.50 1.50 3.00 77
E1-9 53.6 5.00 3.0 36 1.67 1.50 3.00 125
M1-16 24.0 2.30 2.5 30* 0.92 0.92 0.50 63 *
M1-8 21.6 2.00 2.0 24* 1.00 1.00 0.50 35 *
M1-1E 86.5 8.00 4.0 48 2.00 1.50 2.00 221
M1-1B 103.4 7.00 4.0 48 1.75 1.50 2.00 221
M1-22 11.3 3.00 2.0 24 1.50 1.50 3.13 43
M1-21 4.3 2.50 1.5 18 1.67 1.50 2.50 18
M1-20 18.4 4.90 2.0 24 2.45 1.50 2.50 39
* Twin pipes
Drainage_Shootaring.xls | Assumptions & Equations 11/20/2008 4:55 PM
Tetra Tech Shootaring Mill Drainage Calculations: Channel Design Page 1 of 12
Type Drainage
Area (ac)
Cum.
Area
(ac)
Ridgeline
Elev. (ft)
Outlet
Elev. (ft)
Basin
Relief,
H (ft)
Tc Path
Length
(ft)
Channel
Length
(ft)
Kirpich's
Tc (min)
Tt in
Channel
(min)
Tc + Tt at
design
point
(min)
Use Tc
(min)
West Side of TSF
W1-1 west_div 0.44 0.44 4808 4428 380 506 85 1.05 1.18 1.05 5.00
W1-2 rundown 0.73 0.73 4808 4430 378 444 n/a 0.91 n/a 0.91 5.00
W1-2A rundown_chute 0.73 0.73 n/a 0.00 n/a 0.00 5.00
W1-3 west_div 0.20 1.36 4471 4427 44 93 106 0.34 1.08 2.23 5.00
W1-4 rundown 0.18 0.18 4550 4430 120 268 n/a 0.79 n/a 0.79 5.00
W1-4A rundown_chute 0.18 0.18 n/a 0.00 n/a 0.00 5.00
W1-5 west_div 0.17 1.70 4450 4427 23 73 118 0.33 1.13 3.31 5.00
W1-6 rundown 2.21 2.21 4901 4430 471 715 n/a 1.45 n/a 1.45 5.00
W1-7 rundown 2.21 2.21 4940 4430 510 790 n/a 1.57 n/a 1.57 5.00
W1-67 rundown 0.00 4.42 n/a 0.00 n/a 0.00 5.00
W1-67A rundown_chute 4.42 4.42 n/a 0.00 n/a 0.00 5.00
W1-8 west_div 0.32 6.45 4518 4427 91 201 121 0.63 0.83 4.44 5.00
W1-9 rundown 0.49 0.49 4810 4430 380 492 n/a 1.02 n/a 1.02 5.00
W1-9A rundown_chute 0.49 0.49 n/a 0.00 n/a 0.00 5.00
W1-10 west_div 0.16 7.09 4520 4427 93 207 46 0.65 0.31 5.27 5.27
W1-11 rundown 0.33 0.33 4807 4430 377 487 n/a 1.01 n/a 1.01 5.00
W1-11A rundown_chute 0.33 0.33 n/a 0.00 n/a 0.00 5.00
W1-12 west_div 0.08 7.49 4448 4426 22 54 57 0.24 0.38 5.58 5.58
W1-13 rundown 1.41 1.41 4802 4430 372 506 n/a 1.06 n/a 1.06 5.00
W1-13A rundown_chute 1.41 1.41 n/a 0.00 n/a 0.00 5.00
Culv W1-14 west_div 0.34 9.24 4492 4426 66 142 135 0.48 0.85 5.95 5.95
W1-15 west_div 0.59 9.84 4548 4426 122 226 135 0.64 0.85 6.81 6.81
W1-16 rundown 4.74 4.74 4945 4430 515 1194 n/a 2.53 n/a 2.53 5.00
W1-16A rundown_chute 4.74 4.74 n/a 0.00 n/a 0.00 5.00
W1-17 west_div 1.70 16.28 4736 4425 311 457 329 1.01 1.84 7.65 7.65
W1-18 rundown 1.82 1.82 4745 4430 315 563 n/a 1.28 n/a 1.28 5.00
W1-18A rundown_chute 1.82 1.82 n/a 0.00 n/a 0.00 5.00
Culv W1-19 west_div 0.68 18.77 4516 4424 92 182 163 0.56 0.90 9.49 9.49
W1-20 west_div 0.20 18.97 4512 4424 88 159 58 0.49 0.32 10.40 10.40
W1-21 rundown 1.75 1.75 4798 4430 368 727 n/a 1.62 n/a 1.62 5.00
W1-21A rundown_chute 1.75 1.75 n/a 0.00 n/a 0.00 5.00
Location / ID #
Drainage_Shootaring (3).xls | Design Calcs 11/21/2008 10:27 AM
Tetra Tech Shootaring Mill Drainage Calculations: Channel Design Page 2 of 12
Type
West Side of TSF
W1-1 west_div
W1-2 rundown
W1-2A rundown_chute
W1-3 west_div
W1-4 rundown
W1-4A rundown_chute
W1-5 west_div
W1-6 rundown
W1-7 rundown
W1-67 rundown
W1-67A rundown_chute
W1-8 west_div
W1-9 rundown
W1-9A rundown_chute
W1-10 west_div
W1-11 rundown
W1-11A rundown_chute
W1-12 west_div
W1-13 rundown
W1-13A rundown_chute
Culv W1-14 west_div
W1-15 west_div
W1-16 rundown
W1-16A rundown_chute
W1-17 west_div
W1-18 rundown
W1-18A rundown_chute
Culv W1-19 west_div
W1-20 west_div
W1-21 rundown
W1-21A rundown_chute
Location / ID #
Rainfall
Intensity, I
(in/hr)
Discharge,
Q100 (cfs)
Side
slope,
z
Base
width,
B (ft)
Rough-
ness, n
Slope, S
(ft/ft)
Built
Depth,
D (ft)
Flow
Depth, y
(ft)
Area,
Achl (ft2)
Wetted
Perimeter,
P (ft)
Hydraulic
Radius, R
(ft)
5.66 2.2 2.5 2 0.035 0.003 2.3 0.55 1.8 5.0 0.37
5.66 3.7 2.5 4 0.035 0.010 1.5 0.38 1.9 6.1 0.31
5.66 3.7 2.5 4 0.080 0.400 1.5 0.21 1.0 5.1 0.19
5.66 6.9 2.5 2 0.035 0.003 2.6 0.96 4.2 7.2 0.59
5.66 0.9 2.5 4 0.035 0.010 1.5 0.17 0.7 4.9 0.15
5.66 0.9 2.5 4 0.080 0.400 1.5 0.09 0.4 4.5 0.09
5.66 8.7 2.5 2 0.035 0.003 2.9 1.07 5.0 7.8 0.64
5.66 11.3 2.5 4 0.035 0.010 1.5 0.71 4.1 7.8 0.52
5.66 11.2 2.5 4 0.035 0.010 1.5 0.71 4.1 7.8 0.52
5.66 22.5 2.5 4 0.035 0.010 1.5 1.02 6.7 9.5 0.70
5.66 22.5 2.5 4 0.080 0.400 1.5 0.59 3.3 7.2 0.45
5.66 32.8 2.5 2 0.035 0.003 3.3 1.95 13.5 12.5 1.07
5.66 2.5 2.5 4 0.035 0.010 1.5 0.30 1.4 5.6 0.26
5.66 2.5 2.5 4 0.080 0.400 1.5 0.17 0.7 4.9 0.15
5.59 35.7 2.5 2 0.035 0.003 3.4 2.03 14.3 12.9 1.11
5.66 1.7 2.5 4 0.035 0.010 1.5 0.24 1.1 5.3 0.21
5.66 1.7 2.5 4 0.080 0.400 1.5 0.13 0.6 4.7 0.12
5.50 37.1 2.5 2 0.035 0.003 3.6 2.06 14.8 13.1 1.13
5.66 7.2 2.5 4 0.035 0.010 1.5 0.55 3.0 7.0 0.43
5.66 7.2 2.5 4 0.080 0.400 1.5 0.31 1.5 5.7 0.26
5.40 44.9 2.5 2 0.035 0.003 4.0 2.24 17.0 14.1 1.21
5.17 45.8 2.5 2 0.035 0.003 4.4 2.26 17.3 14.2 1.22
5.66 24.2 2.5 4 0.035 0.010 1.5 1.06 7.0 9.7 0.73
5.66 24.2 2.5 4 0.080 0.400 1.5 0.62 3.4 7.3 0.47
4.94 72.4 2.5 2 0.035 0.003 5.4 2.74 24.3 16.8 1.45
5.66 9.3 2.5 4 0.035 0.010 1.5 0.64 3.6 7.4 0.48
5.66 9.3 2.5 4 0.080 0.400 1.5 0.36 1.8 5.9 0.30
4.45 75.1 2.5 2 0.035 0.003 5.9 2.79 25.0 17.0 1.47
4.25 72.6 2.5 2 0.035 0.003 6.1 2.75 24.4 16.8 1.45
5.66 8.9 2.5 4 0.035 0.010 1.5 0.62 3.5 7.4 0.47
5.66 8.9 2.5 4 0.080 0.400 1.5 0.35 1.7 5.9 0.29
Drainage_Shootaring (3).xls | Design Calcs 11/21/2008 10:27 AM
Tetra Tech Shootaring Mill Drainage Calculations: Channel Design Page 3 of 12
Type
West Side of TSF
W1-1 west_div
W1-2 rundown
W1-2A rundown_chute
W1-3 west_div
W1-4 rundown
W1-4A rundown_chute
W1-5 west_div
W1-6 rundown
W1-7 rundown
W1-67 rundown
W1-67A rundown_chute
W1-8 west_div
W1-9 rundown
W1-9A rundown_chute
W1-10 west_div
W1-11 rundown
W1-11A rundown_chute
W1-12 west_div
W1-13 rundown
W1-13A rundown_chute
Culv W1-14 west_div
W1-15 west_div
W1-16 rundown
W1-16A rundown_chute
W1-17 west_div
W1-18 rundown
W1-18A rundown_chute
Culv W1-19 west_div
W1-20 west_div
W1-21 rundown
W1-21A rundown_chute
Location / ID #Velocity,
VAVG (fps)τ (psf)R / W
Bend
coeff.,
Kb
Bend
shear, τb
(psf)
θ
(deg.)K1 CV
VSS
(ft/s)
Steep-
channel
D50 (in)
Bottom
D50 (in)
Side
slope
D50 (in)
Use D50
(in)
1.21 0.10 50 1.05 0.11 21.8 0.82 0.94 1.21 0.78 0.2 0.1 2.5
1.95 0.24 50 1.05 0.25 21.8 0.82 0.94 1.95 1.34 0.8 0.5 2.5
3.84 5.30 50 1.05 5.57 21.8 0.82 0.94 3.84 10.40 4.8 3.1 12.0
1.64 0.18 50 1.05 0.19 21.8 0.82 0.94 1.64 1.66 0.4 0.2 2.5
1.21 0.10 50 1.05 0.11 21.8 0.82 0.94 1.21 0.52 0.3 0.2 2.5
2.30 2.30 50 1.05 2.41 21.8 0.82 0.94 2.30 4.04 1.6 1.0 6.0
1.74 0.20 50 1.05 0.21 21.8 0.82 0.94 1.74 1.93 0.4 0.3 2.5
2.76 0.44 50 1.05 0.46 21.8 0.82 0.94 2.76 2.82 1.6 1.0 2.5
2.76 0.44 50 1.05 0.46 21.8 0.82 0.94 2.76 2.82 1.6 1.0 2.5
3.36 0.64 50 1.05 0.67 21.8 0.82 0.94 3.36 4.48 2.3 1.5 2.5
6.92 14.81 50 1.05 15.55 21.8 0.82 0.94 6.92 34.68 16.3 10.3 18.0
2.44 0.37 50 1.05 0.38 21.8 0.82 0.94 2.44 4.68 0.9 0.6 2.5
1.71 0.19 50 1.05 0.20 21.8 0.82 0.94 1.71 1.03 0.6 0.4 2.5
3.33 4.19 50 1.05 4.40 21.8 0.82 0.94 3.33 7.95 3.6 2.3 6.0
2.49 0.38 50 1.05 0.40 21.8 0.82 0.94 2.49 4.95 0.9 0.6 2.5
1.50 0.15 50 1.05 0.16 21.8 0.82 0.94 1.50 0.79 0.4 0.3 2.5
2.89 3.31 50 1.05 3.48 21.8 0.82 0.94 2.89 6.10 2.7 1.7 6.0
2.52 0.39 50 1.05 0.41 21.8 0.82 0.94 2.52 5.08 1.0 0.6 2.5
2.41 0.35 50 1.05 0.36 21.8 0.82 0.94 2.41 2.09 1.2 0.7 2.5
4.82 7.79 50 1.05 8.17 21.8 0.82 0.94 4.82 16.19 7.7 4.9 12.0
2.64 0.42 50 1.05 0.44 21.8 0.82 0.94 2.64 5.77 1.1 0.7 2.5
2.65 0.42 50 1.05 0.44 21.8 0.82 0.94 2.65 5.85 1.1 0.7 2.5
3.43 0.66 50 1.05 0.69 21.8 0.82 0.94 3.43 4.69 2.4 1.5 2.5
7.07 15.39 50 1.05 16.16 21.8 0.82 0.94 7.07 36.35 17.0 10.8 18.0
2.98 0.51 50 1.05 0.54 21.8 0.82 0.94 2.98 7.94 1.3 0.9 2.5
2.60 0.40 50 1.05 0.42 21.8 0.82 0.94 2.60 2.48 1.4 0.9 2.5
5.24 9.01 50 1.05 9.46 21.8 0.82 0.94 5.24 19.18 9.2 5.8 18.0
3.01 0.52 50 1.05 0.55 21.8 0.82 0.94 3.01 8.13 1.4 0.9 2.5
2.98 0.51 50 1.05 0.54 21.8 0.82 0.94 2.98 7.95 1.3 0.9 2.5
2.57 0.39 50 1.05 0.41 21.8 0.82 0.94 2.57 2.42 1.4 0.9 2.5
5.18 8.82 50 1.05 9.26 21.8 0.82 0.94 5.18 18.73 9.0 5.7 18.0
Drainage_Shootaring (3).xls | Design Calcs 11/21/2008 10:27 AM
Tetra Tech Shootaring Mill Drainage Calculations: Channel Design Page 4 of 12
Type Drainage
Area (ac)
Cum.
Area
(ac)
Ridgeline
Elev. (ft)
Outlet
Elev. (ft)
Basin
Relief,
H (ft)
Tc Path
Length
(ft)
Channel
Length
(ft)
Kirpich's
Tc (min)
Tt in
Channel
(min)
Tc + Tt at
design
point
(min)
Use Tc
(min)Location / ID #
W1-22 west_div 0.23 20.95 4494 4424 70 162 98 0.54 0.54 10.72 10.72
W1-23 rundown 0.44 0.44 4760 4430 330 318 n/a 0.65 n/a n/a 5.00
W1-23A rundown_chute 0.44 0.44 n/a 0.00 n/a n/a 5.00
W1-24 west_div 0.10 21.49 4506 4424 82 168 43 0.53 0.23 11.26 11.26
W1-25 rundown 0.35 0.35 4780 4430 350 333 n/a 0.67 n/a n/a 5.00
W1-25A rundown_chute 0.35 0.35 n/a 0.00 n/a n/a 5.00
W1-26 west_div 0.22 22.07 4526 4423 103 207 82 0.62 0.45 11.49 11.49
W1-27 rundown 0.44 0.44 4786 4430 356 372 n/a 0.76 n/a n/a 5.00
W1-27A rundown_chute 0.44 0.44 n/a 0.00 n/a n/a 5.00
W1-28(upper) west_div 0.34 22.85 4530 4423 107 203 27 0.60 0.15 11.94 11.94
W1-28(lower) west_div 0.00 22.85 54 0.00 0.13 12.09 12.09
W1-29(upper) west_div 0.74 23.59 4792 4427 365 400 81 0.82 0.19 12.22 12.22
W1-29(lower) west_div 0.00 23.59 64 0.00 0.10 12.41 12.41
East Side of TSF
E1-1 east_div 2.62 2.62 4528 4428 100 673 219 2.45 1.87 2.45 5.00
Culv E1-2 east_div 0.82 3.44 4456 4427 29 341 355 1.80 2.83 2.45 5.00
E1-3 east_div 0.49 3.93 4464 4426 38 296 227 1.38 1.76 5.28 5.28
E1-4/5/6 rundown_chute 0.98 0.98 4529 4434 95 380 20 1.29 0.08 1.29 5.00
E1-6 east_div 0.00 4.91 68 0.00 0.32 5.28 5.28
Culv E1-7 east_div 0.54 5.45 4525 4426 99 334 75 1.09 0.34 5.60 5.60
E1-8 east_div 0.60 0.60 4524 4414 110 460 235 1.52 1.23 1.52 5.00
PMF E1-13 east_PMF 5.26 5.26 4548 4516 32 1255 471 7.80 2.15 7.80 7.80
E1-13 east_PMF 5.26 5.26 4548 4516 32 1255 471 7.80 3.84 7.80 7.80
PMF E1-12 east_PMF 0.46 0.46 4554 4530 24 299 325 1.66 2.04 1.66 5.00
E1-12 east_PMF 0.46 0.46 4554 4530 24 299 325 1.66 3.56 1.66 5.00
E1-11 east_PMF 0.30 0.77 4554 4526 28 222 181 1.11 1.72 1.66 5.00
E1-10 natural 6.66 12.68 4548 4414 134 1335 839 4.83 1.56 7.80 7.80
Culv E1-9 0.00 13.29 0 0.00 0.00 9.36 9.36
Drainage_Shootaring (3).xls | Design Calcs 11/21/2008 10:27 AM
Tetra Tech Shootaring Mill Drainage Calculations: Channel Design Page 5 of 12
TypeLocation / ID #
W1-22 west_div
W1-23 rundown
W1-23A rundown_chute
W1-24 west_div
W1-25 rundown
W1-25A rundown_chute
W1-26 west_div
W1-27 rundown
W1-27A rundown_chute
W1-28(upper) west_div
W1-28(lower) west_div
W1-29(upper) west_div
W1-29(lower) west_div
East Side of TSF
E1-1 east_div
Culv E1-2 east_div
E1-3 east_div
E1-4/5/6 rundown_chute
E1-6 east_div
Culv E1-7 east_div
E1-8 east_div
PMF E1-13 east_PMF
E1-13 east_PMF
PMF E1-12 east_PMF
E1-12 east_PMF
E1-11 east_PMF
E1-10 natural
Culv E1-9
Rainfall
Intensity, I
(in/hr)
Discharge,
Q100 (cfs)
Side
slope,
z
Base
width,
B (ft)
Rough-
ness, n
Slope, S
(ft/ft)
Built
Depth,
D (ft)
Flow
Depth, y
(ft)
Area,
Achl (ft2)
Wetted
Perimeter,
P (ft)
Hydraulic
Radius, R
(ft)
4.20 79.2 2.5 2 0.035 0.003 6.4 2.85 26.0 17.3 1.50
5.66 2.2 2.5 4 0.035 0.010 1.5 0.29 1.4 5.5 0.24
5.66 2.2 2.5 4 0.080 0.400 1.5 0.16 0.7 4.9 0.14
4.12 79.7 2.5 2 0.035 0.003 6.5 2.86 26.1 17.4 1.50
5.66 1.8 2.5 4 0.035 0.010 1.5 0.25 1.2 5.4 0.22
5.66 1.8 2.5 4 0.080 0.400 1.5 0.14 0.6 4.7 0.13
4.09 81.1 2.5 2 0.035 0.003 6.7 2.88 26.5 17.5 1.51
5.66 2.3 2.5 4 0.035 0.010 1.5 0.29 1.4 5.6 0.25
5.66 2.3 2.5 4 0.080 0.400 1.5 0.16 0.7 4.9 0.14
4.02 82.6 2.5 2 0.035 0.003 6.8 2.90 26.8 17.6 1.52
4.00 82.2 2.5 2 0.045 0.045 3.0 1.80 11.7 11.7 1.00
3.98 84.4 2.5 4 0.045 0.045 3.0 1.55 12.2 12.3 0.99
3.95 83.8 2.5 4 0.045 0.159 3.0 1.12 7.6 10.0 0.76
5.66 13.4 2.5 0 0.035 0.003 2.7 1.66 6.9 8.9 0.77
5.66 17.5 2.5 0 0.035 0.003 3.7 1.83 8.4 9.9 0.85
5.58 19.7 2.5 0 0.035 0.003 4.4 1.92 9.2 10.3 0.89
5.66 5.0 2.5 4 0.080 0.400 1.5 0.25 1.2 5.4 0.22
5.58 24.7 2.5 2 0.035 0.010 1.5 1.31 6.9 9.1 0.77
5.50 27.0 2.5 2 0.035 0.010 1.5 1.37 7.4 9.4 0.79
5.66 3.1 2.5 0 0.035 0.030 1.5 0.62 1.0 3.3 0.29
37.01 175.1 2.5 8 0.035 0.003 3.5 3.07 48.1 24.5 1.96
4.90 23.2 2.5 8 0.035 0.003 3.5 1.06 11.3 13.7 0.83
44.82 18.6 2 2 0.035 0.005 1.5 1.44 7.0 8.4 0.83
5.66 2.4 2 2 0.035 0.005 1.5 0.51 1.5 4.3 0.36
5.66 3.9 2 2 0.035 0.005 1.5 0.67 2.2 5.0 0.45
4.90 56.0 3 0 0.045 0.122 n/a 1.44 6.3 9.1 0.69
4.48 53.6
Drainage_Shootaring (3).xls | Design Calcs 11/21/2008 10:27 AM
Tetra Tech Shootaring Mill Drainage Calculations: Channel Design Page 6 of 12
TypeLocation / ID #
W1-22 west_div
W1-23 rundown
W1-23A rundown_chute
W1-24 west_div
W1-25 rundown
W1-25A rundown_chute
W1-26 west_div
W1-27 rundown
W1-27A rundown_chute
W1-28(upper) west_div
W1-28(lower) west_div
W1-29(upper) west_div
W1-29(lower) west_div
East Side of TSF
E1-1 east_div
Culv E1-2 east_div
E1-3 east_div
E1-4/5/6 rundown_chute
E1-6 east_div
Culv E1-7 east_div
E1-8 east_div
PMF E1-13 east_PMF
E1-13 east_PMF
PMF E1-12 east_PMF
E1-12 east_PMF
E1-11 east_PMF
E1-10 natural
Culv E1-9
Velocity,
VAVG (fps)τ (psf)R / W
Bend
coeff.,
Kb
Bend
shear, τb
(psf)
θ
(deg.)K1 CV
VSS
(ft/s)
Steep-
channel
D50 (in)
Bottom
D50 (in)
Side
slope
D50 (in)
Use D50
(in)
3.05 0.53 50 1.05 0.56 21.8 0.82 0.94 3.05 8.43 1.4 0.9 2.5
1.66 0.18 50 1.05 0.19 21.8 0.82 0.94 1.66 0.96 0.5 0.3 2.5
3.22 3.95 50 1.05 4.15 21.8 0.82 0.94 3.22 7.45 3.3 2.1 6.0
3.05 0.53 50 1.05 0.56 21.8 0.82 0.94 3.05 8.46 1.4 0.9 2.5
1.53 0.16 50 1.05 0.16 21.8 0.82 0.94 1.53 0.83 0.5 0.3 2.5
2.96 3.45 50 1.05 3.63 21.8 0.82 0.94 2.96 6.39 2.8 1.8 6.0
3.06 0.54 50 1.05 0.57 21.8 0.82 0.94 3.06 8.56 1.4 0.9 2.5
1.66 0.18 50 1.05 0.19 21.8 0.82 0.94 1.66 0.97 0.6 0.3 2.5
3.23 3.97 50 1.05 4.17 21.8 0.82 0.94 3.23 7.49 3.4 2.1 6.0
3.08 0.54 50 1.05 0.57 21.8 0.82 0.94 3.08 8.67 1.4 0.9 2.5
7.01 5.06 50 1.05 5.31 21.8 0.82 0.94 7.01 38.81 12.7 8.1 18.0
6.94 4.34 6.25 1.43 6.21 21.8 0.82 1.12 9.21 24.90 15.4 19.8 18.0
10.97 11.13 50 1.05 11.69 21.8 0.82 0.94 10.97 49.92 43.9 27.8 18 Grout
1.95 0.31 50 1.05 0.33 21.8 0.82 0.94 1.95 0.00 0.5 0.3 2.5
2.09 0.34 50 1.05 0.36 21.8 0.82 0.94 2.09 0.00 0.6 0.4 2.5
2.15 0.36 50 1.05 0.38 21.8 0.82 0.94 2.15 0.00 0.7 0.4 2.5
4.27 6.32 50 1.05 6.64 21.8 0.82 0.94 4.27 12.73 6.0 3.8 12.0
3.55 0.82 50 1.05 0.86 21.8 0.82 0.94 3.55 7.55 2.5 1.6 2.5
3.63 0.85 50 1.05 0.90 21.8 0.82 0.94 3.63 8.02 2.6 1.7 2.5
3.19 1.15 50 1.05 1.21 21.8 0.82 0.94 3.19 0.00 2.3 1.5 2.5
3.64 0.57 50 1.05 0.60 21.8 0.82 0.94 3.64 5.67 2.2 1.4
2.05 0.20 50 1.05 0.21 21.8 0.82 0.94 2.05 1.47 0.7 0.4 2.5
2.65 0.45 50 1.05 0.47 26.6 0.72 0.94 2.65 4.26 1.4 0.9
1.52 0.16 50 1.05 0.17 26.6 0.72 0.94 1.52 1.07 0.4 0.3 2.5
1.75 0.21 50 1.05 0.22 26.6 0.72 0.94 1.75 1.50 0.6 0.4 2.5
8.95 10.96 50 1.05 11.50 18.4 0.87 0.94 8.95 0.00 22.8 14.5 None
Drainage_Shootaring (3).xls | Design Calcs 11/21/2008 10:27 AM
Tetra Tech Shootaring Mill Drainage Calculations: Channel Design Page 7 of 12
Type Drainage
Area (ac)
Cum.
Area
(ac)
Ridgeline
Elev. (ft)
Outlet
Elev. (ft)
Basin
Relief,
H (ft)
Tc Path
Length
(ft)
Channel
Length
(ft)
Kirpich's
Tc (min)
Tt in
Channel
(min)
Tc + Tt at
design
point
(min)
Use Tc
(min)Location / ID #
Mill to TSF
M1-18(upper) mill 1.81 1.81 4568 4542.74 25.26 364 250 2.05 0.90 2.05 5.00
M1-18(lower) mill 0.00 1.81 4562 4530 32 729 687 4.16 3.21 4.16 5.00
PMF M1-17 mill 2.46 4.26 4568 4502 66 227 608 0.82 1.11 4.16 5.00
M1-17 mill 2.46 4.26 4568 4502 66 227 608 0.82 2.06 4.16 5.00
PMF M1-14(upper) mill 3.81 8.08 4570 4487 83 289 103 0.99 0.14 4.16 5.00
M1-14(upper) mill 3.81 8.08 4570 4487 83 289 103 0.99 0.26 4.16 5.00
PMF M1-14(lower) mill 0.00 8.08 4570 4487 83 289 393 0.99 1.26 4.30 5.00
M1-14(lower) mill 0.00 8.08 4570 4487 83 289 393 0.99 2.25 4.30 5.00
PMF M1-16 mill 0.59 0.59 4506 4488 18 220 170 1.30 1.15 1.30 5.00
Culv M1-16 mill 0.59 0.59 4506 4488 18 220 170 1.30 2.32 1.30 5.00
PMF M1-15 mill 0.61 1.20 4488 4484 4 31 368 0.24 2.01 1.30 5.00
M1-15 mill 0.61 1.20 4488 4484 4 31 368 0.24 3.91 1.30 5.00
PMF M1-13 mill 2.49 11.77 4570 4494 76 272 427 0.96 1.27 5.57 5.57
M1-13 mill 2.49 11.77 4570 4494 76 272 427 0.96 2.27 5.57 5.57
M1-12 mill 1.20 1.20 4563 4561 2 472 430 7.33 4.50 7.33 7.33
M1-11 mill 0.00 1.20 4561 4551 10 37 35 0.21 0.10 7.33 7.33
M1-10 mill 1.51 1.51 4562 4551 11 720 184 6.19 1.49 6.19 6.19
Culv M1-8 mill 2.09 4.80 4550 4548 2 325 489 4.76 2.95 7.43 7.43
M1-7 mill 2.50 2.50 4552 4548 4 574 312 7.04 2.67 7.04 7.04
M1-6(upper) chute 0.53 7.83 4550 4482 68 262 68 0.96 0.15 10.28 10.28
M1-6(middle) chute 0.00 7.83 55 0.00 0.23 10.28 10.28
M1-6(lower) chute 0.00 7.83 90 0.00 0.26 10.28 10.28
Drainage_Shootaring (3).xls | Design Calcs 11/21/2008 10:27 AM
Tetra Tech Shootaring Mill Drainage Calculations: Channel Design Page 8 of 12
TypeLocation / ID #
Mill to TSF
M1-18(upper) mill
M1-18(lower) mill
PMF M1-17 mill
M1-17 mill
PMF M1-14(upper) mill
M1-14(upper) mill
PMF M1-14(lower) mill
M1-14(lower) mill
PMF M1-16 mill
Culv M1-16 mill
PMF M1-15 mill
M1-15 mill
PMF M1-13 mill
M1-13 mill
M1-12 mill
M1-11 mill
M1-10 mill
Culv M1-8 mill
M1-7 mill
M1-6(upper) chute
M1-6(middle) chute
M1-6(lower) chute
Rainfall
Intensity, I
(in/hr)
Discharge,
Q100 (cfs)
Side
slope,
z
Base
width,
B (ft)
Rough-
ness, n
Slope, S
(ft/ft)
Built
Depth,
D (ft)
Flow
Depth, y
(ft)
Area,
Achl (ft2)
Wetted
Perimeter,
P (ft)
Hydraulic
Radius, R
(ft)
5.66 9.2 2 2 0.045 0.063 1.5 0.61 2.0 4.7 0.42
5.66 9.2 2 2 0.035 0.019 1.5 0.74 2.6 5.3 0.49
44.82 172.0 2.5 6 0.045 0.059 2.0 1.80 18.9 15.7 1.21
5.66 21.7 2.5 6 0.045 0.059 2.0 0.59 4.4 9.2 0.48
44.82 325.8 2.5 8 0.045 0.091 2.0 2.02 26.3 18.9 1.39
5.66 41.1 2.5 8 0.045 0.091 2.0 0.65 6.2 11.5 0.54
44.82 325.8 2.5 8 0.035 0.005 4.0 3.66 62.9 27.7 2.27
5.66 41.1 2.5 8 0.035 0.005 4.0 1.27 14.1 14.8 0.95
44.82 24.0 2.5 8 0.035 0.005 1.5 0.94 9.7 13.1 0.74
5.66 3.0 2.5 8 0.035 0.005 1.5 0.28 2.5 9.5 0.26
44.82 48.5 2.5 8 0.035 0.005 1.5 1.38 15.9 15.5 1.03
5.66 6.1 2.5 8 0.035 0.005 1.5 0.43 3.9 10.3 0.38
43.24 458.2 2.5 10 0.035 0.005 4.5 4.05 81.5 31.8 2.56
5.51 58.4 2.5 10 0.035 0.005 4.5 1.38 18.6 17.4 1.07
5.03 5.4 2 2 0.035 0.003 1.5 0.90 3.4 6.0 0.57
5.03 5.4 2 2 0.045 0.175 1.5 0.35 1.0 3.6 0.27
5.34 7.2 2 2 0.035 0.005 1.5 0.92 3.5 6.1 0.58
5.00 21.6 2 2 0.035 0.005 1.5 1.54 7.8 8.9 0.88
5.11 11.5 2 2 0.035 0.003 1.5 1.29 5.9 7.8 0.76
4.27 30.1 3 6 0.080 0.531 2.0 0.52 3.9 9.3 0.42
4.27 30.1 3 6 0.080 0.087 2.0 0.86 7.4 11.4 0.64
4.27 30.1 3 6 0.080 0.228 2.0 0.66 5.3 10.2 0.52
Drainage_Shootaring (3).xls | Design Calcs 11/21/2008 10:27 AM
Tetra Tech Shootaring Mill Drainage Calculations: Channel Design Page 9 of 12
TypeLocation / ID #
Mill to TSF
M1-18(upper) mill
M1-18(lower) mill
PMF M1-17 mill
M1-17 mill
PMF M1-14(upper) mill
M1-14(upper) mill
PMF M1-14(lower) mill
M1-14(lower) mill
PMF M1-16 mill
Culv M1-16 mill
PMF M1-15 mill
M1-15 mill
PMF M1-13 mill
M1-13 mill
M1-12 mill
M1-11 mill
M1-10 mill
Culv M1-8 mill
M1-7 mill
M1-6(upper) chute
M1-6(middle) chute
M1-6(lower) chute
Velocity,
VAVG (fps)τ (psf)R / W
Bend
coeff.,
Kb
Bend
shear, τb
(psf)
θ
(deg.)K1 CV
VSS
(ft/s)
Steep-
channel
D50 (in)
Bottom
D50 (in)
Side
slope
D50 (in)
Use D50
(in)
4.63 2.42 50 1.05 2.54 26.6 0.72 0.94 4.63 10.87 6.9 4.4 6.0
3.57 0.86 50 1.05 0.90 26.6 0.72 0.94 3.57 5.51 3.5 2.2 2.5
9.08 6.63 50 1.05 6.96 21.8 0.82 0.94 9.08 35.47 24.3 15.4
4.92 2.17 50 1.05 2.28 21.8 0.82 0.94 4.92 8.93 7.0 4.4 6.0
12.40 11.39 50 1.05 11.96 21.8 0.82 0.94 12.40 56.89 51.5 32.7
6.61 3.66 50 1.05 3.84 21.8 0.82 0.94 6.61 14.32 14.2 9.0 12.0
5.18 1.14 50 1.05 1.20 21.8 0.82 0.94 5.18 11.40 5.0 3.2
2.91 0.39 50 1.05 0.41 21.8 0.82 0.94 2.91 2.87 1.5 1.0 2.5
2.47 0.29 50 1.05 0.31 21.8 0.82 0.94 2.47 2.00 1.1 0.7
1.22 0.09 50 1.05 0.09 21.8 0.82 0.94 1.22 0.50 0.3 0.2 2.5
3.06 0.43 50 1.05 0.45 21.8 0.82 0.94 3.06 3.20 1.7 1.1
1.57 0.13 50 1.05 0.14 21.8 0.82 0.94 1.57 0.81 0.4 0.3 2.5
5.62 1.26 50 1.05 1.33 21.8 0.82 0.94 5.62 12.33 6.0 3.8
3.13 0.43 50 1.05 0.45 21.8 0.82 0.94 3.13 3.12 1.8 1.2 2.5
1.59 0.17 50 1.05 0.18 26.6 0.72 0.94 1.59 1.41 0.4 0.3 2.5
5.72 3.84 50 1.05 4.03 26.6 0.72 0.94 5.72 13.50 13.5 8.6 12.0
2.06 0.28 50 1.05 0.29 26.6 0.72 0.94 2.06 2.24 0.8 0.5 2.5
2.76 0.48 50 1.05 0.50 26.6 0.72 0.94 2.76 4.71 1.5 1.0 2.5
1.95 0.24 50 1.05 0.26 26.6 0.72 0.94 1.95 2.35 0.7 0.4 2.5
7.64 17.25 50 1.05 18.12 18.4 0.87 0.94 7.64 37.55 19.8 12.6 18 grout
4.09 4.67 50 1.05 4.91 18.4 0.87 0.94 4.09 13.79 3.7 2.3 18.0
5.72 9.40 50 1.05 9.87 18.4 0.87 0.94 5.72 23.52 9.1 5.8 18 grout
Drainage_Shootaring (3).xls | Design Calcs 11/21/2008 10:27 AM
Tetra Tech Shootaring Mill Drainage Calculations: Channel Design Page 10 of 12
Type Drainage
Area (ac)
Cum.
Area
(ac)
Ridgeline
Elev. (ft)
Outlet
Elev. (ft)
Basin
Relief,
H (ft)
Tc Path
Length
(ft)
Channel
Length
(ft)
Kirpich's
Tc (min)
Tt in
Channel
(min)
Tc + Tt at
design
point
(min)
Use Tc
(min)Location / ID #
PMF M1-1E mill 3.43 23.04 4544 4479 65 314 626 1.20 1.07 10.92 10.92
Culv M1-1E mill 3.43 23.04 4544 4479 65 314 626 1.20 1.89 10.92 10.92
M1-1D mill 2.46 25.50 4548 4466 82 501 181 1.88 0.41 11.99 11.99
M1-3 mill 1.78 1.78 4554 4549 5 722 690 8.42 5.47 8.42 8.42
M1-2 mill 2.24 4.02 4550 4540 10 922 957 8.55 6.15 8.55 8.55
M1-4 mill 1.91 1.91 4550 4540 10 738 458 6.61 3.48 6.61 6.61
M1-1A(upper) chute 0.94 6.86 4541 4451 90 373 60 1.29 0.26 14.56 14.56
M1-1A(middle)chute 0.00 6.86 203 1.29 0.51 14.56 14.56
M1-1A(lower) chute 0.00 6.86 58 1.29 0.71 14.56 14.56
M1-1C mill 0.74 33.10 4536 4435 101 418 143 1.41 0.28 16.05 16.05
Culv M1-1B culvert 0.15 33.25 4439 4431.5 7.5 142 100 1.10 16.33 16.33
Mill to East Cyn
Culv M1-22 mill 2.31 2.31 4566 4531 35 1001 688 5.80 3.01 5.80 5.80
Culv M1-21 mill 0.85 0.85 4577 4536 41 295 380 1.33 1.28 1.33 5.00
M1-20 mill 0.75 3.90 4550 4530 20 662 144 4.46 0.73 6.53 6.53
Offsite N of Ponds
OS1-1 natural 23.21 23.21 4574 4500 74 1518 0 7.04 7.04 7.04
PMF OS1-2A offsite 28.63 28.63 4654 4470 184 3841 82 14.48 0.22 14.48 14.48
OS1-2A offsite 28.63 28.63 4654 4470 184 3841 82 14.48 0.38 14.48 14.48
PMF OS1-2B offsite 28.63 28.63 4654 4470 184 3841 302 14.48 0.42 14.48 14.48
OS1-2B offsite 28.63 28.63 4654 4470 184 3841 302 14.48 0.75 14.48 14.48
PMF OS1-2C offsite 28.63 28.63 4654 4470 184 3841 67 14.48 0.11 14.48 14.48
OS1-2C offsite 28.63 28.63 4654 4470 184 3841 67 14.48 0.20 14.48 14.48
PMF OS1-2D offsite 28.63 28.63 4654 4470 184 3841 278 14.48 0.75 14.48 14.48
OS1-2D offsite 28.63 28.63 4654 4470 184 3841 278 14.48 1.28 14.48 14.48
PMF OS1-2E offsite 28.63 28.63 4654 4470 184 3841 139 14.48 0.16 14.48 14.48
OS1-2E offsite 28.63 28.63 4654 4470 184 3841 139 14.48 0.29 14.48 14.48
Drainage_Shootaring (3).xls | Design Calcs 11/21/2008 10:27 AM
Tetra Tech Shootaring Mill Drainage Calculations: Channel Design Page 11 of 12
TypeLocation / ID #
PMF M1-1E mill
Culv M1-1E mill
M1-1D mill
M1-3 mill
M1-2 mill
M1-4 mill
M1-1A(upper) chute
M1-1A(middle)chute
M1-1A(lower) chute
M1-1C mill
Culv M1-1B culvert
Mill to East Cyn
Culv M1-22 mill
Culv M1-21 mill
M1-20 mill
Offsite N of Ponds
OS1-1 natural
PMF OS1-2A offsite
OS1-2A offsite
PMF OS1-2B offsite
OS1-2B offsite
PMF OS1-2C offsite
OS1-2C offsite
PMF OS1-2D offsite
OS1-2D offsite
PMF OS1-2E offsite
OS1-2E offsite
Rainfall
Intensity, I
(in/hr)
Discharge,
Q100 (cfs)
Side
slope,
z
Base
width,
B (ft)
Rough-
ness, n
Slope, S
(ft/ft)
Built
Depth,
D (ft)
Flow
Depth, y
(ft)
Area,
Achl (ft2)
Wetted
Perimeter,
P (ft)
Hydraulic
Radius, R
(ft)
29.72 616.1 2.5 10 0.045 0.030 4.0 3.41 63.2 28.4 2.23
4.17 86.5 2.5 10 0.045 0.030 4.0 1.20 15.7 16.5 0.95
4.01 92.0 2.5 10 0.045 0.068 3.0 0.99 12.4 15.3 0.81
4.74 7.6 2 2 0.035 0.005 1.5 0.93 3.6 6.2 0.59
4.70 17.0 2 2 0.035 0.005 1.5 1.38 6.6 8.2 0.80
5.23 9.0 2 2 0.035 0.005 1.5 1.01 4.1 6.5 0.63
3.63 22.4 3 6 0.080 0.096 2.0 0.71 5.8 10.5 0.55
3.63 22.4 3 6 0.080 0.454 2.0 0.46 3.4 8.9 0.38
3.63 22.4 3 6 0.080 0.005 2.0 1.55 16.5 15.8 1.05
3.48 103.6 2.5 10 0.045 0.090 3.0 0.98 12.2 15.3 0.80
3.46 103.4
5.44 11.3 2 2 0.045 0.031 1.5 0.82 3.0 5.7 0.53
5.66 4.3 2 2 0.045 0.142 1.5 0.33 0.9 3.5 0.25
5.25 18.4 2 2 0.045 0.015 1.5 1.24 5.6 7.6 0.74
5.11 106.7
25.23 650.0 2.5 10 0.035 0.005 5.0 4.79 105.4 35.8 2.94
3.64 93.7 2.5 10 0.035 0.005 5.0 1.79 25.9 19.6 1.32
25.23 650.0 2.5 10 0.045 0.050 3.5 3.08 54.5 26.6 2.05
3.64 93.7 2.5 10 0.045 0.050 3.5 1.09 13.9 15.9 0.87
25.23 650.0 2.5 10 0.045 0.030 3.5 3.50 65.7 28.9 2.28
3.64 93.7 2.5 10 0.045 0.030 3.5 1.26 16.5 16.8 0.99
25.23 650.0 2.5 10 0.035 0.005 5.0 4.79 105.4 35.8 2.94
3.64 93.7 2.5 10 0.035 0.005 5.0 1.79 25.9 19.6 1.32
25.23 650.0 2.5 10 0.045 0.080 3.0 2.73 46.0 24.7 1.86
3.64 93.7 2.5 10 0.045 0.080 3.0 0.96 11.8 15.1 0.78
Drainage_Shootaring (3).xls | Design Calcs 11/21/2008 10:27 AM
Tetra Tech Shootaring Mill Drainage Calculations: Channel Design Page 12 of 12
TypeLocation / ID #
PMF M1-1E mill
Culv M1-1E mill
M1-1D mill
M1-3 mill
M1-2 mill
M1-4 mill
M1-1A(upper) chute
M1-1A(middle)chute
M1-1A(lower) chute
M1-1C mill
Culv M1-1B culvert
Mill to East Cyn
Culv M1-22 mill
Culv M1-21 mill
M1-20 mill
Offsite N of Ponds
OS1-1 natural
PMF OS1-2A offsite
OS1-2A offsite
PMF OS1-2B offsite
OS1-2B offsite
PMF OS1-2C offsite
OS1-2C offsite
PMF OS1-2D offsite
OS1-2D offsite
PMF OS1-2E offsite
OS1-2E offsite
Velocity,
VAVG (fps)τ (psf)R / W
Bend
coeff.,
Kb
Bend
shear, τb
(psf)
θ
(deg.)K1 CV
VSS
(ft/s)
Steep-
channel
D50 (in)
Bottom
D50 (in)
Side
slope
D50 (in)
Use D50
(in)
9.75 6.38 50 1.05 6.70 21.8 0.82 0.94 9.75 40.60 24.8 15.7
5.53 2.25 50 1.05 2.37 21.8 0.82 0.94 5.53 10.97 7.8 4.9 12.0
7.45 4.19 50 1.05 4.40 21.8 0.82 0.94 7.45 17.97 17.2 10.9 18.0
2.10 0.29 50 1.05 0.31 26.6 0.72 0.94 2.10 2.34 0.9 0.5 2.5
2.59 0.43 50 1.05 0.45 26.6 0.72 0.94 2.59 4.01 1.3 0.8 2.5
2.20 0.32 50 1.05 0.33 26.6 0.72 0.94 2.20 2.62 0.9 0.6 2.5
3.87 4.3 50 1.05 4.49 18.4 0.87 0.94 3.87 11.97 3.4 2.1 12.0
6.58 13.0 50 1.05 13.69 18.4 0.87 0.94 6.58 28.27 14.1 8.9 18 grout
1.35 0.5 50 1.05 0.51 18.4 0.87 0.94 1.35 2.32 0.2 0.1 6.0
8.51 5.48 50 1.05 5.75 21.8 0.82 0.94 8.51 22.72 24.1 15.3 18 grout
3.80 1.60 50 1.05 1.67 26.6 0.72 0.94 3.80 8.45 3.9 2.5 6.0
4.96 2.91 50 1.05 3.06 26.6 0.72 0.94 4.96 10.32 9.6 6.1 12.0
3.30 1.16 50 1.05 1.22 26.6 0.72 0.94 3.30 7.79 2.5 1.6 2.5
6.17 1.50 50 1.05 1.57 21.8 0.82 0.94 6.17 15.56 7.2 4.6
3.61 0.56 50 1.05 0.59 21.8 0.82 0.94 3.61 4.28 2.4 1.5 2.5
11.92 9.61 50 1.05 10.09 21.8 0.82 0.94 11.92 55.86 42.0 26.6
6.75 3.40 50 1.05 3.57 21.8 0.82 0.94 6.75 15.36 13.1 8.3 12.0
9.90 6.56 50 1.05 6.88 21.8 0.82 0.94 9.90 42.07 25.5 16.2
5.67 2.36 50 1.05 2.47 21.8 0.82 0.94 5.67 11.57 8.2 5.2 12.0
6.17 1.50 50 1.05 1.57 21.8 0.82 0.94 6.17 15.56 7.2 4.6
3.61 0.56 50 1.05 0.59 21.8 0.82 0.94 3.61 4.28 2.4 1.5 2.5
14.13 13.64 50 1.05 14.32 21.8 0.82 0.94 14.13 72.51 66.2 42.0
7.92 4.77 50 1.05 5.01 21.8 0.82 0.94 7.92 19.94 20.3 12.8 18.0
Drainage_Shootaring (3).xls | Design Calcs 11/21/2008 10:27 AM

APPENDIX H.2
TAILINGS CELL FREEBOARD CALCULATIONS
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:PMP Estimation APPROVED: SHEET:
Local Storm PMP Calculations:
HMR 49 Step:
6.3A Local storm PMP computation
1.Average 1-hr, 1-mi2 PMP for drainage [fig. 4.5]8.3 in.
2. a. Reduction for elevation [5% per 1000' above 5000'] 0.0 %
b. step 1 x (100 - 2a). 8.3 in
3. Average 6/1-hr ratio for drainage [fig 4.7] 1.10
4.0.25 0.5 0.75 123456
86 93 97 100 107 109 110 110 110 %
5.7.1 7.7 8.1 8.3 8.9 9.0 9.1 9.1 9.1 in
6. Areal reduction [fig. 4.9] 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 %
7. Areal reduced PMP [5 x 6] 7.1 7.7 8.1 8.3 8.9 9.0 9.1 9.1 9.1 in
123456
8.8.3 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 in
1234
7.1 0.6 0.3 0.2 } 15-min increments
9. Time sequence of incremental PMP according to:order:5 3 1 2 4 6
a. HMR No. 5 Hourly increments [table 4.7]0.0 0.2 8.3 0.6 0.1 0.0 in
123456hrs
order:6 4 2 1 3 5
b. EM-1110-2-1411 Hourly increments [table 4.7]0.0 0.1 0.6 8.3 0.2 0.0 in
123456hrs
order:1 2 3 4
c. Four largest 15-min increments [table 4.8]7.1 0.6 0.3 0.2 in
0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 hrs
1 of 1
subtraction of 7]
1-mi2 PMP for indicated
Incremental PMP [successive
Duration (hrs)
Durational variation for 6/1-hr
ratio of step 3 [table 4.4]
durations [2b x 4]
4/10/2008
114-181692
PMP Rainfall Estimate_Shootaring.xls Local Storm 4/10/2008 11:13 PM
Page 1 of 10
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations Plan CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:Tailings Storage Facility Freeboard Calculations APPROVED: SHEET:
Volume Calculations:
Volumes determined using average end areas.
Tailings Storage Facility
Elevation Area Incr. Volume
Cum.
Volume Area Incr.
Volume
Cum.
Volume
(ft)(ft2)(ft3)(ft3)(ac) (ac-ft) (ac-ft)
4360 20647 0 0 0.47 0 0
4370 183916 1022815 1022815 4.22 23.48 23.48
4380 423337 3036265 4059080 9.72 69.70 93.18
4390 705404 5643705 9702785 16.19 129.56 222.75
4400 958848 8321260 18024045 22.01 191.03 413.78
4410 1108011 10334295 28358340 25.44 237.24 651.02
4420 1214866 11614384 39972723.6 27.89 266.63 917.65
4430 1315462 12651639 52624362.2 30.20 290.44 1208.09
4431.5 1367637 2012324 54636686.5 31.40 46.20 1254.29
Offsite Area OS1-1
Elevation Area Incr. Volume
Cum.
Volume Area Incr.
Volume
Cum.
Volume
(ft)(ft2)(ft3)(ft3)(ac) (ac-ft) (ac-ft)
4496 18600 0 0 0.43 0 0
4498 76316 94917 94916.62 1.75 2.18 2.18
4500 163394 239710 334626.76 3.75 5.50 7.68
Offsite Area OS1-3
Elevation Area Incr. Volume
Cum.
Volume Area Incr.
Volume
Cum.
Volume
(ft)(ft2)(ft3)(ft3)(ac) (ac-ft) (ac-ft)
4426 3201 0 0 0.07 0 0
4428 16374 19576 19575.82 0.38 0.45 0.45
4430 30431 46806 66381.46 0.70 1.07 1.52
4448 277127 2768028 2834409.22 6.36 63.55 65.07
11/21/2008
114-181692
Freeboard_Tailings.xls Cell Volume 11/21/2008 10:47 AM
Page 2 of 10
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations Plan CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:Tailings Storage Facility Freeboard Calculations APPROVED: SHEET:
11/21/2008
114-181692
Offsite Area OS1-4
Elevation Area Incr. Volume
Cum.
Volume Area Incr.
Volume
Cum.
Volume
(ft)(ft2)(ft3)(ft3)(ac) (ac-ft) (ac-ft)
4414 8075 0 0 0.19 0 0
4416 46911 54986 54986.1 1.08 1.26 1.26
4418 82094 129005 183991.37 1.88 2.96 4.22
4426 45203 509188 693179.49 1.04 11.69 15.91
4428 82108 127311 820490.09 1.88 2.92 18.84
4430 112457 194565 1015055.22 2.58 4.47 23.30
4440 271732 1920945 2936000.67 6.24 44.10 67.40
4448 487723 3037820 5973820.71 11.20 69.74 137.14
Offsite Area OS1-5
Elevation Area Incr. Volume
Cum.
Volume Area Incr.
Volume
Cum.
Volume
(ft)(ft2)(ft3)(ft3)(ac) (ac-ft) (ac-ft)
4394 1017 0 0 0.02 0 0
4400 13166 42550 42550 0.30 0.98 0.98
4404 22231 70795 113345 0.51 1.63 2.60
4410 46413 205933 319278 1.07 4.73 7.33
4416 84021 391301 710579 1.93 8.98 16.31
4420 126272 420585 1131164 2.90 9.66 25.97
4430 233127 1796993 2928157 5.35 41.25 67.22
Freeboard_Tailings.xls Cell Volume 11/21/2008 10:47 AM
Page 3 of 10
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:Tailings Storage Facility Freeboard Calculations APPROVED: SHEET:
Catchment Area and Design Flood Volume:
Tailings impoundment must be able to contain the water rise due to the design flood, plus wind and wave action.
Design flood is the 6-hour PMF series, per NRC Regulatory Guide 3.11 (1977), and proposed Revision Three
of RG 3.11, issued February 2008 as Draft Regulatory Guide DG-3032.
6-hour Local Storm PMP (in) = 9.1 (See PMP estimates)
40% of 6-hour PMP (in) = 3.64
100-year, 6-hour precipitation (in) = 1.79 (NOAA Atlas 14 rainfall, reproduced below)
Total PMF-series precipitation (in) = 14.53
Assumed runoff coefficient = 0.90 (assumed to apply to both tailings and offsite areas)
Runoff depth (in) = 13.08 (Runoff depth = Total precipitation x Runoff coefficient)
6 12 24 48 192
1 0.55 0.67 0.79 0.88 1
2 0.69 0.83 1 1.11 1.26
5 0.89 1.05 1.29 1.42 1.62
10 1.06 1.23 1.53 1.68 1.91
25 1.31 1.49 1.86 2.06 2.32
50 1.52 1.69 2.12 2.36 2.65
100 1.79 1.91 2.4 2.69 3.01
200 2.14 2.2 2.7 3.03 3.38
500 2.71 2.74 3.11 3.53 3.92
1000 3.24 3.27 3.44 3.93 4.34
* ARI = Approximate Recurrence Interval
The process ponds are designed to contain the incident PMF, and are thus non-contributing areas for the
overall TSF PMF freeboard calculations
The natural sump area within OS1-2 will reduce the PMF volume arriving at the TSF.
Sump areas formed between the existing cross-valley berms and the proposed divider berm will also reduce
the PMF volume arriving at the TSF. The existing berms have a top elevation of 4448, but credit is only
taken for storage lying below elevation 4430, the top of the TSF liner.
Phase: 1 Offsite Runoff Sources to TSF Sump Volumes (ac-ft):
Cell: Main OS1-1 23.21 OS1-2 7.68
TSF Cell Area (ac): 31.55 OS1-2 28.63 OS1-3 1.52
Outside Area Contributing Runon (ac): 175.62 OS1-3 25.61 OS1-4 23.30
Non-contributing area [process ponds] (ac): 7.54 OS1-4 22.97 OS1-5 67.22
Total Area (ac): 207.17 OS1-5 14.78 Total: 99.73
Runoff volume (ac-ft): 225.77 Mill 33.25
Losses to sumps (ac-ft): 103.65 West bluff 22.85
Runoff volume less losses (ac-ft): 122.12 East bluff 4.33
Maximum liner elevation (ft): 4430.0 Total: 175.62 ac
Assumed operating water surface elev.(ft): 4420.0
Surface area at operating WSE (ac): 27.89
WSE rise due to design flood (ft): 4.38
11/21/2008
114-181692
ARI*
(years)
Duration (hours)
Runoff volume [ac-ft] = Total Area [ac] * Runoff depth [in] / 12 [in/foot]
WSE = W ater Surface Elevation
WSE rise due to design flood [ft] = Runoff volume [ac-ft] / Surface area [ac]
Freeboard_Tailings.xls Overall Freeboard 11/21/2008 10:47 AM
Page 4 of 10
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:Tailings Storage Facility Freeboard Calculations APPROVED: SHEET:
11/21/2008
114-181692
Windspeed, fetch, and wind setup
Fetch:
Wind setup is typically calculated using roughly twice the effective fetch, but here the straight-line fetch
was determined directly, so no adjustments to effective fetch are required.
Straight-line fetch was measured as the longest distance across the lined area for each cell in any direction.
This method is conservative because it ignores the possibility that the design windspeed may
not necessarily occur along the measured fetch, and because the liner extents exceed the possible
pool extents due to the presence of freeboard and the width of horizontal liner atop the perimeter bench.
Water depth over fetch was assumed constant, at the operating water level plus the rise due to the design storm.
The shallow depth was selected to lead to a conservative (high) estimate of wind setup, which increases with
decreasing depth. Use of the shallow water depth does not affect the wave-height or wave runup determinations,
which were not sensitive to operating water depth within the range of reasonable depths.
Phase: 1
Cell: Main
WSE Rise due to design flood (ft): 4.38
Operating water depth (ft): 2.00
Fetch (ft): 1560
Fetch (mi): 0.30
Fastest-mile wind speed:
Design wind at 100 -year recurrence interval, based on adjustment of 50-year windspeed.
50-year windspeed based on Figure 1 in ANSI/ASCE 7-93 "Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and
Other Structures".
Use importance factor, I = 1.07, for "essential facilities" (Category III), which has the effect of converting the
50-year windspeed to a 100-year value.
Revisions to ANSI/ASCE 7-93 requiring use of the 3-second gust instead of the fastest-mile windspeed are
not applicable to reservoir wind-wave effects analysis in general, or this case in particular. For the present
analysis, the duration of the controlling windspeed is between 0.2 and 0.3 hours (see individual cell-phase
calculation sheets). Short gusts do not control wave growth.
Fastest-mile 10-m overland windspeed, V = 70.00 mph
Importance factor to obtain 100-year windspeed, I = 1.07 (Exposure Class C)
Use 100-yr fastest-mile wind speed, I x V = 75 mph (rounded)
= 110.0 fps
Freeboard_Tailings.xls Overall Freeboard 11/21/2008 10:47 AM
Page 5 of 10
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:Tailings Storage Facility Freeboard Calculations APPROVED: SHEET:
11/21/2008
114-181692
Adjustments to Wind Speed
See CEM II-2-1-i.(3), "Procedure for adjusting observed winds" for figures & detailed explanation of methods.
Level:
U10 = Uz (10/z)1/7 For z < 20 m; z must be in meters
Use CEM Fig II-2-6 if air-sea temperature data is available, or if z exceeds 20 meters
Assume wind speed read at 10 m; no correction required
U / U10 =1.0 for measurements taken at 10 m
U10 = Uf / (U / U10) =75.00 mph
Location (overland or overwater):
Location and stability adjustments are applied after duration adjustments in the table below
Use CEM Fig II-2-7 for windspeed measurements taken over land
RL = UW / UL =1.2 for winds blowing off the water
If fetch < 10 miles & wind data is taken over land, UW = 1.2 UL, and RT is not applied (equivalent to RL = RT = 1.1).
This applies here; fetches do not exceed 1 mile.
Boundary layer stability:
Location and stability adjustments are applied after duration adjustments in the table below
Use CEM Fig II-2-8 when air-sea temperature difference is known; RT = 1.1 otherwise
No air-sea temperature information is available; therefore
RT = WC / WW =1.0 RT is not applicable to fetches < 10 miles.
Adjusted fastest-mile windspeed, Uf(adj) = U10 * RL * RT =90.00 mph = 132.00 fps
40.23 m/s
Duration:
Equation from CEM Fig II-2-2 (SPM Fig 3-12), Duration of the fastest mile windspeed as a function of windspeed:
t = 3600 / Uf (Uf in mph)
Equations from CEM Fig II-2-1 (SPM Fig. 3-13), Ratio of windspeed of any duration Ut to the 1-hour windspeed U3600:
1.277 + 0.296 tanh [0.9 log10 (45/t)]1 sec < t < 3,600 sec
-0.15 log10 t + 1.5334 3,600 sec < t < 36,000 sec
Return
Period (yr)Uf(adj) (mph)t (sec)Ut / U3,600
U3,600
(mph)U3,600 (fps)
100 90.00 40.0 1.291 69.7 102.3
Duration is further modified during determination of the design wave conditions.
Ut / U3,600 =
Freeboard_Tailings.xls Overall Freeboard 11/21/2008 10:47 AM
Page 6 of 10
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:Tailings Storage Facility Freeboard Calculations APPROVED: SHEET:
11/21/2008
114-181692
Wind Setup:
Use Zuider-Zee formula, from EM-1110-2-1420 "Hydrologic Engineering Requirements for Dams" (31 Oct 97)
U2 F
1400 D
S = Wind tide (setup)
U = Average wind velocity over the fetch (fastest-mile, adjusted to overwater value)
F = Fetch
D = Average depth of water along the fetch line
U = 90.0 mph (fastest-mile speed, adjusted to overwater value)
Phase: 1
Cell: Main
Fetch, F (mi): 0.30
WSE Rise due to design flood (ft): 4.38
Operating water depth (ft): 2.00
Water depth, D (ft): 6.38
Wind setup, S (ft): 0.27
Wind setup is not included in water depth for computation of the design wave height,
but is used to compute the wave runup at the shoreline
Design Wave & Wave Runup:
See sheets for individual Cell-Phase combinations for design wave and wave runup computations.
Total Freeboard
Total freeboard is the sum of the rise due to the design flood, wind setup, and wave runup.
Phase: 1
Cell: Main
WSE Rise due to design flood (ft): 4.38
Wind setup (ft): 0.27
Wave runup (ft): 2.80
Total freeboard (ft): 7.45
Use: rounded up to the next half-foot (ft): 7.50
S =
Freeboard_Tailings.xls Overall Freeboard 11/21/2008 10:47 AM
Page 7 of 10
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:Tailings Storage Facility Freeboard Calculations APPROVED: SHEET:
Design Wave Conditions, Phase 1, TSF Cell:
Inputs:
Use:
Adjusted 100-yr, 1-hr windspeed, U3600 =69.7 mph 102.3 fps
Effective fetch, X = 0.30 miles = 1571 ft (use straight-line fetch, conservative)
Water depth, d = 6.38 feet (minimum operating depth + design storm rise)
Equations:
CEM now recommends computing deepwater wave heights for shallow water, subject to the limiting wave
period given by CEM Eq II-2-39, and a limiting height of 0.6 times the depth. See pp. II-2-45 through 47.
Time required for waves crossing a fetch X under a velocity u to become fetch-limited (CEM Eq II-2-35):
77.23 X0.67 CEM Fig II-2-3, "Equivalent duration for wave generation
u0.34 g0.33 as a function of fetch and wind speed," gives the same
same information graphically for fetches up to 10 km.
Limiting wave period in shallow water:
Tp = 9.78 (d/g)1/2 CEM Eq II-2-39
Equations governing wave growth with fetch (CEM Eq II-2-36):
gHmo / u*
2 = 0.0413 ( g X / u*
2 )1/2
gTp / u* = 0.651 ( g X / u*
2 )1/3
CD =u*
2 / U10
2
CD =0.001 (1.1 + 0.035 U10) (Requires U10 in m/s)
where
X = straight line fetch distance over which the wind blows
Hmo =energy-based significant wave height
Tp =frequency
CD =drag coefficient
U10 =wind speed at 10 m elevation
u* =friction velocity
The fully-developed wave height is given by CEM Eq II-2-30:
H: = λ5 u2 / g = 0.27 u2 / 32.2 (u in ft/s)
The fully-developed wave height (upper limit to wave growth for any wind speed) is given by CEM Eq II-2-30:
gHm0 / u*
2 = 211.5
gTp / u* = 239.8
For duration-limited conditions, duration is converted into an equivalent fetch using CEM Eq II-2-38:
gX / u*
2 = 0.00523 ( g t / u* )3/2 (where t is the duration)
114-181692
11/21/2008
tx,u =
Freeboard_Tailings.xls WaveRunupPH0 11/21/2008 10:47 AM
Page 8 of 10
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:Tailings Storage Facility Freeboard Calculations APPROVED: SHEET:
114-181692
11/21/2008
Calculations:
Duration, t
(hr)t (sec)Ut / U3,600 Ut (mph) tx,u (hrs)u*
2
(ft2/sec2)gHm0 / u*
2 gTp / u*Hm0 (ft) Tp (sec)
0.01 36 1.303 90.8 0.18 44.76 1.4 6.8 1.93 1.41
0.1 360 1.078 75.2 0.19 27.69 1.8 8.0 1.52 1.30
0.2 720 1.042 72.6 0.19 25.39 1.8 8.2 1.45 1.28
0.22 792 1.038 72.4 0.19 25.15 1.9 8.2 1.45 1.28
0.229 824.4 1.036 72.3 0.19 25.06 1.9 8.2 1.44 1.28
0.23 828 1.036 72.3 0.19 25.05 1.9 8.2 1.44 1.28
1 3600 1.000 69.7 0.20 22.90 1.9 8.5 1.38 1.26
2 7200 0.955 66.6 0.20 20.42 2.1 8.8 1.30 1.24
4 14400 0.910 63.4 0.20 18.11 2.2 9.2 1.23 1.21
6 21600 0.883 61.6 0.20 16.84 2.3 9.4 1.18 1.20
8 28800 0.864 60.3 0.21 15.97 2.3 9.6 1.15 1.19
10 36000 0.850 59.3 0.21 15.32 2.4 9.7 1.13 1.18
gX / u*
2 X (mi)gHm0 / u*
2 gTp / u*Hm0 (ft) Tp (sec)Limitation Hm0 (ft) Tp (sec)
0.01 12 0.0 0.1 1.5 0.20 0.31 Duration 0.20 0.31
0.1 541 0.1 1.0 5.3 0.83 0.87 Duration 0.83 0.87
0.2 1632 0.2 1.7 7.7 1.32 1.20 Duration 1.32 1.20
0.22 1896 0.3 1.8 8.1 1.40 1.26 Duration 1.40 1.26
0.229 2020 0.3 1.9 8.2 1.44 1.28 Fetch 1.44 1.28
0.23 2034 0.3 1.9 8.2 1.45 1.28 Fetch 1.44 1.28
1 19718 2.7 5.8 17.6 4.12 2.61 Fetch 1.38 1.26
2 60767 7.3 10.2 25.6 6.46 3.59 Fetch 1.30 1.24
4 188086 20.0 17.9 37.3 10.07 4.93 Fetch 1.23 1.21
6 364928 36.1 24.9 46.5 13.05 5.93 Fetch 1.18 1.20
8 584561 54.9 31.6 54.4 15.66 6.76 Fetch 1.15 1.19
10 842909 76.0 37.9 61.5 18.04 7.48 Fetch 1.13 1.18
Controlling hindcast wave: Fetch-limited
Hmo = 1.44 feet
Tp =1.28 sec
Limiting wave period:Tp = 9.78 (d/g)0.5 =4.35 sec
Period OK, use deepwater values
Limiting wave height: 0.6*d = 3.8 feet
Wave height OK
Controlling Conditions
Wind Velocity and Duration
Duration-Limited ConditionsDuration, t
(hr)
Fetch-Limited Conditions
Freeboard_Tailings.xls WaveRunupPH0 11/21/2008 10:47 AM
Page 9 of 10
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:Tailings Storage Facility Freeboard Calculations APPROVED: SHEET:
114-181692
11/21/2008
Check Maximum Breaking Wave:
Fig 2-2 of EM 1110-2-1614, or SPM Fig 7-4, gives the maximum breaker height, Hb:
Nearshore slope, m:
Assume nearshore slope, m =0.000 ft/ft (tailings surface assumed level)
Depth at structure, d s :
Operating water depth = 2.00 ft
Rise due to PMF series = 4.38 ft
Wind setup = 0.27 ft
Depth at structure, ds =6.65 ft
Controlling wave height:
Wave period, T = 1.28 sec
ds / gT2 =0.1262
Not used Hs / Hmo = exp [C0 ( d / gTp
2 )-C1] Where C0=0.00089 (0.00136 conservative) & C1=0.834
Not used Hs / Hmo =1.008
Not used Hs =1.46
Hb / ds =0.78 (EM 1110-2-1614, Fig 2-2, "Design Breaker Height,"
Maximum breaker height, Hb =5.18 ft at T
or SPM Fig 7-4, at computed m and ds/gT2.)
Hindcast wave height, Hm0 = 1.44 feet
Controlling wave height, H =1.44 feet (Hindcast wave height controls)
Check maximum breaker height at a variety of wave periods other than the hindcast period (after CETN-III-2):
Typical range of periods from 0.5*T to 1.9*T = 0.64 sec to 1.15 sec
Assumed
T* (sec)ds / gT2 Hb / ds Hb (ft)Use for design:
0.64 0.5047 0.78 5.2 at 0% slope H = 1.44 feet
1.15 0.1558 0.78 5.2 at 0% slope
Tp =1.28 sec
4.35 0.0109 0.78 5.2 at 0% slope
4.35 0.0109 1.2 8.0 at 10% slope (assumed max; not actual)
10.00 0.0021 0.8 5.3 at 0% slope
*4.35 sec is the limiting period, computed above.
Freeboard_Tailings.xls WaveRunupPH0 11/21/2008 10:47 AM
Page 10 of 10
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:Tailings Storage Facility Freeboard Calculations APPROVED: SHEET:
114-181692
11/21/2008
Check Wave Runup:
Input data:
Design wave height, Hmo =1.44 feet
Design wave period, Tp =1.28 sec
Revetment slope, cot θ =2 Upstream face of dam is 2:1; divider berm is 2.5:1
Equations:
Maximum runup by irregular waves on riprap covered revetments is estimated by:
a ξ (Eq 2-6 in EM 1110-2-1614)
1 + b ξ
where
Rmax =maximum vertical height of runup above swl
a, b = regression coefficients determined as 1.022 and 0.247, respectively
The more conservative value of a = 1.286 is used here.
ξ =surf parameter defined by:
Results for slopes other than riprap or quarrystone can be adjusted by the factors in Table 2-2 of
EM-1110-2-1614. See pages 2-6 & 2-7 of that manual for details.
The surf parameter equation above is equivalent to that in CEM, Eqn II-4-1.
For quarrystone at 2:1 slope, Rough slope runup correction factor r = 0.615
Calculations:
ξ =1.20
Rmax / Hmo =1.19
Rmax =1.72 feet
Wave runup, Rmax / r =2.80 feet
( 2 π Hmo / g Tp
2 ) 1/2
tan θ
Rmax / Hmo =
ξ =
Freeboard_Tailings.xls WaveRunupPH0 11/21/2008 10:47 AM
Page 1 of 12
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:Process Pond Freeboard Calculations APPROVED: SHEET:
Catchment Area and Design Flood Volume:
Tailings impoundment must be able to contain the water rise due to the design flood, plus wind and wave action.
Design flood is the 6-hour PMF series, per NRC Regulatory Guide 3.11 (1977), and proposed Revision Three
of RG 3.11, issued February 2008 as Draft Regulatory Guide DG-3032.
6-hour Local Storm PMP (in) = 9.1 (See PMP estimates)
40% of 6-hour PMP (in) = 3.64
100-year, 6-hour precipitation (in) = 1.79 (NOAA Atlas 14 rainfall, reproduced below)
Total PMF-series precipitation (in) = 14.53
Assumed runoff coefficient = 1.00 (process pond is lined with impermeable membrane)
Runoff depth (in) = 14.53 (Runoff depth = Total precipitation x Runoff coefficient)
6 12 24 48 192
1 0.55 0.67 0.79 0.88 1
2 0.69 0.83 1 1.11 1.26
5 0.89 1.05 1.29 1.42 1.62
10 1.06 1.23 1.53 1.68 1.91
25 1.31 1.49 1.86 2.06 2.32
50 1.52 1.69 2.12 2.36 2.65
100 1.79 1.91 2.4 2.69 3.01
200 2.14 2.2 2.7 3.03 3.38
500 2.71 2.74 3.11 3.53 3.92
1000 3.24 3.27 3.44 3.93 4.34
* ARI = Approximate Recurrence Interval
The process ponds are designed to contain the incident PMF, and are thus non-contributing areas for the overall
TSF PMF freeboard calculations. Offsite runoff is diverted around the ponds in ditches sized for the PMF.
Cell: South North
Cell Area (ac): 3.80 3.74
Outside Area Contributing Runon (ac): 0.00 0.00
Total Area (ac): 3.80 3.74
Runoff volume (ac-ft): 4.60 4.52
Losses to sumps (ac-ft): 0.00 0.00
Runoff volume less losses (ac-ft): 4.60 4.52
Maximum liner elevation (ft): 4485.0 4488.0
Assumed operating water surface elev.(ft): 4481.0 4484.0
Surface area at operating WSE (ac): 2.86 2.72
WSE rise due to design flood (ft): 1.61 1.67
Runoff volume [ac-ft] = Total Area [ac] * Runoff depth [in] / 12 [in/foot]
WSE = Water surface elevation
WSE rise due to design flood [ft] = Runoff volume [ac-ft] / Surface area [ac]
ARI*
(years)
Duration (hours)
11/21/2008
Process Ponds
114-181692
Freeboard_Process Ponds.xls Overall Freeboard 11/21/2008 10:50 AM
Page 2 of 12
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:Process Pond Freeboard Calculations APPROVED: SHEET:
11/21/2008
114-181692
Windspeed, fetch, and wind setup
Fetch:
Wind setup is typically calculated using roughly twice the effective fetch, but here the straight-line fetch
was determined directly, so no adjustments to effective fetch are required.
Straight-line fetch was measured as the longest distance across the lined area for each cell in any direction.
This method is conservative because it ignores the possibility that the design windspeed may
not necessarily occur along the measured fetch, and because the liner extents exceed the possible
pool extents due to the presence of freeboard and the width of horizontal liner atop the perimeter bench.
Water depth over fetch was assumed constant, at the operating water level plus the rise due to the design storm.
Cell: South North
WSE Rise due to design flood (ft): 1.61 1.67
Operating WSE (ft): 4481.00 4484.00
Avg. pond bottom elev (ft): 4467.00 4476.00
Operating water depth (ft): 14.00 8.00
Fetch (ft): 607 547
Fetch (mi): 0.11 0.10
Fastest-mile wind speed:
Design wind at 100 -year recurrence interval, based on adjustment of 50-year windspeed.
50-year windspeed based on Figure 1 in ANSI/ASCE 7-93 "Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and
Other Structures".
Use importance factor, I = 1.07, for "essential facilities" (Category III), which has the effect of converting the
50-year windspeed to a 100-year value.
Revisions to ANSI/ASCE 7-93 requiring use of the 3-second gust instead of the fastest-mile windspeed are
not applicable to reservoir wind-wave effects analysis in general, or this case in particular. For the present
analysis, the duration of the controlling windspeed is between 0.2 and 0.3 hours (see individual cell-phase
calculation sheets). Short gusts do not control wave growth.
Fastest-mile 10-m overland windspeed, V = 70.00 mph
Importance factor to obtain 100-year windspeed, I = 1.07 (Exposure Class C)
Use 100-yr fastest-mile wind speed, I x V = 75 mph (rounded)
= 110.0 fps
Process Ponds
Freeboard_Process Ponds.xls Overall Freeboard 11/21/2008 10:50 AM
Page 3 of 12
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:Process Pond Freeboard Calculations APPROVED: SHEET:
11/21/2008
114-181692
Adjustments to Wind Speed
See CEM II-2-1-i.(3), "Procedure for adjusting observed winds" for figures & detailed explanation of methods.
Level:
U10 = Uz (10/z)1/7 For z < 20 m; z must be in meters
Use CEM Fig II-2-6 if air-sea temperature data is available, or if z exceeds 20 meters
Assume wind speed read at 10 m; no correction required
U / U10 =1.0 for measurements taken at 10 m
U10 = Uf / (U / U10) =75.00 mph
Location (overland or overwater):
Location and stability adjustments are applied after duration adjustments in the table below
Use CEM Fig II-2-7 for windspeed measurements taken over land
RL = UW / UL =1.2 for winds blowing off the water
If fetch < 10 miles & wind data is taken over land, UW = 1.2 UL, and RT is not applied (equivalent to RL = RT = 1.1).
This applies here; fetches do not exceed 1 mile.
Boundary layer stability:
Location and stability adjustments are applied after duration adjustments in the table below
Use CEM Fig II-2-8 when air-sea temperature difference is known; RT = 1.1 otherwise
No air-sea temperature information is available; therefore
RT = WC / WW =1.0 RT is not applicable to fetches < 10 miles.
Adjusted fastest-mile windspeed, Uf(adj) = U10 * RL * RT =90.00 mph = 132.00 fps
40.23 m/s
Duration:
Equation from CEM Fig II-2-2 (SPM Fig 3-12), Duration of the fastest mile windspeed as a function of windspeed:
t = 3600 / Uf (Uf in mph)
Equations from CEM Fig II-2-1 (SPM Fig. 3-13), Ratio of windspeed of any duration Ut to the 1-hour windspeed U3600:
1.277 + 0.296 tanh [0.9 log10 (45/t)]1 sec < t < 3,600 sec
-0.15 log10 t + 1.5334 3,600 sec < t < 36,000 sec
Return
Period (yr)Uf(adj) (mph)t (sec)Ut / U3,600
U3,600
(mph)U3,600 (fps)
100 90.00 40.0 1.291 69.7 102.3
Duration is further modified during determination of the design wave conditions.
Ut / U3,600 =
Freeboard_Process Ponds.xls Overall Freeboard 11/21/2008 10:50 AM
Page 4 of 12
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:Process Pond Freeboard Calculations APPROVED: SHEET:
11/21/2008
114-181692
Wind Setup:
Use Zuider-Zee formula, from EM-1110-2-1420 "Hydrologic Engineering Requirements for Dams" (31 Oct 97)
U2 F
1400 D
S = Wind tide (setup)
U = Average wind velocity over the fetch (fastest-mile, adjusted to overwater value)
F = Fetch
D = Average depth of water along the fetch line
U = 90.0 mph (fastest-mile speed, adjusted to overwater value)
Phase:
Cell: South North
Fetch, F (mi): 0.11 0.10
WSE Rise due to design flood (ft): 1.61 1.67
Operating water depth (ft): 14.00 8.00
Water depth, D (ft): 15.61 9.67
Wind setup, S (ft): 0.04 0.06
Wind setup is not included in water depth for computation of the design wave height,
but is used to compute the wave runup at the shoreline
Design Wave & Wave Runup:
See sheets for individual Cell-Phase combinations for design wave and wave runup computations.
Total Freeboard
Total freeboard is the sum of the rise due to the design flood, wind setup, and wave runup.
Cell: South North
WSE Rise due to design flood (ft): 1.61 1.67
Wind setup (ft): 0.04 0.06
Wave runup (ft): 1.22 1.15
Total freeboard (ft): 2.87 2.88
Use: rounded up to the next half-foot (ft): 3.00 3.00
S =
Process Ponds
Process Ponds
Freeboard_Process Ponds.xls Overall Freeboard 11/21/2008 10:50 AM
Page 5 of 12
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:Process Pond Freeboard Calculations APPROVED: SHEET:
Design Wave Conditions, Process Pond, South Cell:
Inputs:
Use:
Adjusted 100-yr, 1-hr windspeed, U3600 =69.7 mph 102.3 fps
Effective fetch, X = 0.11 miles = 607 ft (use straight-line fetch, conservative)
Water depth, d = 15.61 feet (minimum operating depth + design storm rise)
Equations:
CEM now recommends computing deepwater wave heights for shallow water, subject to the limiting wave
period given by CEM Eq II-2-39, and a limiting height of 0.6 times the depth. See pp. II-2-45 through 47.
Time required for waves crossing a fetch X under a velocity u to become fetch-limited (CEM Eq II-2-35):
77.23 X0.67 CEM Fig II-2-3, "Equivalent duration for wave generation
u0.34 g0.33 as a function of fetch and wind speed," gives the same
same information graphically for fetches up to 10 km.
Limiting wave period in shallow water:
Tp = 9.78 (d/g)1/2 CEM Eq II-2-39
Equations governing wave growth with fetch (CEM Eq II-2-36):
gHmo / u*
2 = 0.0413 ( g X / u*
2 )1/2
gTp / u* = 0.651 ( g X / u*
2 )1/3
CD =u*
2 / U10
2
CD =0.001 (1.1 + 0.035 U10) (Requires U10 in m/s)
where
X = straight line fetch distance over which the wind blows
Hmo =energy-based significant wave height
Tp =frequency
CD =drag coefficient
U10 =wind speed at 10 m elevation
u* =friction velocity
The fully-developed wave height is given by CEM Eq II-2-30:
H: = λ5 u2 / g = 0.27 u2 / 32.2 (u in ft/s)
The fully-developed wave height (upper limit to wave growth for any wind speed) is given by CEM Eq II-2-30:
gHm0 / u*
2 = 211.5
gTp / u* = 239.8
For duration-limited conditions, duration is converted into an equivalent fetch using CEM Eq II-2-38:
gX / u*
2 = 0.00523 ( g t / u* )3/2 (where t is the duration)
114-181692
11/21/2008
tx,u =
Freeboard_Process Ponds.xls WaveRunup ProcessSouth 11/21/2008 10:50 AM
Page 6 of 12
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:Process Pond Freeboard Calculations APPROVED: SHEET:
114-181692
11/21/2008
Calculations:
Duration, t
(hr)t (sec)Ut / U3,600 Ut (mph) tx,u (hrs)u*
2
(ft2/sec2)gHm0 / u*
2 gTp / u*Hm0 (ft) Tp (sec)
0.01 36 1.303 90.8 0.09 44.76 0.9 4.9 1.20 1.03
0.1 360 1.078 75.2 0.10 27.69 1.1 5.8 0.94 0.95
0.119 428.4 1.068 74.5 0.10 27.01 1.1 5.8 0.93 0.94
0.12 432 1.067 74.4 0.10 26.98 1.1 5.8 0.93 0.94
0.121 435.6 1.067 74.4 0.10 26.95 1.1 5.8 0.93 0.94
0.13 468 1.063 74.1 0.10 26.70 1.1 5.9 0.93 0.94
1 3600 1.000 69.7 0.10 22.90 1.2 6.2 0.86 0.92
2 7200 0.955 66.6 0.11 20.42 1.3 6.4 0.81 0.90
4 14400 0.910 63.4 0.11 18.11 1.4 6.7 0.76 0.88
6 21600 0.883 61.6 0.11 16.84 1.4 6.8 0.74 0.87
8 28800 0.864 60.3 0.11 15.97 1.4 7.0 0.72 0.86
10 36000 0.850 59.3 0.11 15.32 1.5 7.1 0.70 0.86
gX / u*
2 X (mi)gHm0 / u*
2 gTp / u*Hm0 (ft) Tp (sec)Limitation Hm0 (ft) Tp (sec)
0.01 12 0.0 0.1 1.5 0.20 0.31 Duration 0.20 0.31
0.1 541 0.1 1.0 5.3 0.83 0.87 Duration 0.83 0.87
0.119 715 0.1 1.1 5.8 0.93 0.94 Duration 0.93 0.94
0.12 725 0.1 1.1 5.8 0.93 0.94 Fetch 0.93 0.94
0.121 734 0.1 1.1 5.9 0.94 0.95 Fetch 0.93 0.94
0.13 824 0.1 1.2 6.1 0.98 0.98 Fetch 0.93 0.94
1 19718 2.7 5.8 17.6 4.12 2.61 Fetch 0.86 0.92
2 60767 7.3 10.2 25.6 6.46 3.59 Fetch 0.81 0.90
4 188086 20.0 17.9 37.3 10.07 4.93 Fetch 0.76 0.88
6 364928 36.1 24.9 46.5 13.05 5.93 Fetch 0.74 0.87
8 584561 54.9 31.6 54.4 15.66 6.76 Fetch 0.72 0.86
10 842909 76.0 37.9 61.5 18.04 7.48 Fetch 0.70 0.86
Controlling hindcast wave: Fetch-limited
Hmo = 0.93 feet
Tp =0.94 sec
Limiting wave period:Tp = 9.78 (d/g)0.5 =6.81 sec
Period OK, use deepwater values
Limiting wave height: 0.6*d = 9.4 feet
Wave height OK
Wind Velocity and Duration
Duration-Limited ConditionsDuration, t
(hr)
Fetch-Limited Conditions
Controlling Conditions
Freeboard_Process Ponds.xls WaveRunup ProcessSouth 11/21/2008 10:50 AM
Page 7 of 12
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:Process Pond Freeboard Calculations APPROVED: SHEET:
114-181692
11/21/2008
Check Maximum Breaking Wave:
Fig 2-2 of EM 1110-2-1614, or SPM Fig 7-4, gives the maximum breaker height, Hb:
Nearshore slope, m:
Assume nearshore slope, m =0.000 ft/ft (tailings surface assumed level)
Depth at structure, d s :
Operating water depth = 14.00 ft
Rise due to PMF series = 1.61 ft
Wind setup = 0.04 ft
Depth at structure, ds =15.65 ft
Controlling wave height:
Wave period, T = 0.94 sec
ds / gT2 =0.5465
Not used Hs / Hmo = exp [C0 ( d / gTp
2 )-C1] Where C0=0.00089 (0.00136 conservative) & C1=0.834
Not used Hs / Hmo =1.002
Not used Hs =0.93
Hb / ds =0.78 (EM 1110-2-1614, Fig 2-2, "Design Breaker Height,"
Maximum breaker height, Hb =12.21 ft at T
or SPM Fig 7-4, at computed m and ds/gT2.)
Hindcast wave height, Hm0 = 0.93 feet
Controlling wave height, H =0.93 feet (Hindcast wave height controls)
Check maximum breaker height at a variety of wave periods other than the hindcast period (after CETN-III-2):
Typical range of periods from 0.5*T to 1.9*T = 0.47 sec to 0.85 sec
Assumed
T* (sec)ds / gT2 Hb / ds Hb (ft)Use for design:
0.47 2.1860 0.78 12.2 at 0% slope H = 0.93 feet
0.85 0.6747 0.78 12.2 at 0% slope
Tp =0.94 sec
6.81 0.0105 0.78 12.2 at 0% slope
6.81 0.0105 1.2 18.8 at 10% slope (assumed max; not actual)
10.00 0.0049 0.8 12.5 at 0% slope
*6.81 sec is the limiting period, computed above.
Freeboard_Process Ponds.xls WaveRunup ProcessSouth 11/21/2008 10:50 AM
Page 8 of 12
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:Process Pond Freeboard Calculations APPROVED: SHEET:
114-181692
11/21/2008
Check Wave Runup:
Input data:
Design wave height, Hmo =0.93 feet
Design wave period, Tp =0.94 sec
Revetment slope, cot θ =3 Process pond interior slope is 3H:1V
Equations:
Maximum runup by irregular waves on riprap covered revetments is estimated by:
a ξ (Eq 2-6 in EM 1110-2-1614)
1 + b ξ
where
Rmax =maximum vertical height of runup above swl
a, b = regression coefficients determined as 1.022 and 0.247, respectively
The more conservative value of a = 1.286 is used here.
ξ =surf parameter defined by:
Results for slopes other than riprap or quarrystone can be adjusted by the factors in Table 2-2 of
EM-1110-2-1614. See pages 2-6 & 2-7 of that manual for details.
The surf parameter equation above is equivalent to that in CEM, Eqn II-4-1.
For quarrystone at 3:1 slope, Rough slope runup correction factor r = 0.615
Calculations:
ξ =0.74
Rmax / Hmo =0.80
Rmax =0.75 feet
Wave runup, Rmax / r =1.22 feet
Rmax / Hmo =
ξ =( 2 π Hmo / g Tp
2 ) 1/2
tan θ
Freeboard_Process Ponds.xls WaveRunup ProcessSouth 11/21/2008 10:50 AM
Page 9 of 12
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:Process Pond Freeboard Calculations APPROVED: SHEET:
Design Wave Conditions, Process Pond, North Cell:
Inputs:
Use:
Adjusted 100-yr, 1-hr windspeed, U3600 =69.7 mph 102.3 fps
Effective fetch, X = 0.10 miles = 547 ft (use straight-line fetch, conservative)
Water depth, d = 9.67 feet (minimum operating depth + design storm rise)
Equations:
CEM now recommends computing deepwater wave heights for shallow water, subject to the limiting wave
period given by CEM Eq II-2-39, and a limiting height of 0.6 times the depth. See pp. II-2-45 through 47.
Time required for waves crossing a fetch X under a velocity u to become fetch-limited (CEM Eq II-2-35):
77.23 X0.67 CEM Fig II-2-3, "Equivalent duration for wave generation
u0.34 g0.33 as a function of fetch and wind speed," gives the same
same information graphically for fetches up to 10 km.
Limiting wave period in shallow water:
Tp = 9.78 (d/g)1/2 CEM Eq II-2-39
Equations governing wave growth with fetch (CEM Eq II-2-36):
gHmo / u*
2 = 0.0413 ( g X / u*
2 )1/2
gTp / u* = 0.651 ( g X / u*
2 )1/3
CD =u*
2 / U10
2
CD =0.001 (1.1 + 0.035 U10) (Requires U10 in m/s)
where
X = straight line fetch distance over which the wind blows
Hmo =energy-based significant wave height
Tp =frequency
CD =drag coefficient
U10 =wind speed at 10 m elevation
u* =friction velocity
The fully-developed wave height is given by CEM Eq II-2-30:
H: = λ5 u2 / g = 0.27 u2 / 32.2 (u in ft/s)
The fully-developed wave height (upper limit to wave growth for any wind speed) is given by CEM Eq II-2-30:
gHm0 / u*
2 = 211.5
gTp / u* = 239.8
For duration-limited conditions, duration is converted into an equivalent fetch using CEM Eq II-2-38:
gX / u*
2 = 0.00523 ( g t / u* )3/2 (where t is the duration)
114-181692
11/21/2008
tx,u =
Freeboard_Process Ponds.xls WaveRunup ProcessNorth 11/21/2008 10:50 AM
Page 10 of 12
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:Process Pond Freeboard Calculations APPROVED: SHEET:
114-181692
11/21/2008
Calculations:
Duration, t
(hr)t (sec)Ut / U3,600 Ut (mph) tx,u (hrs)u*
2
(ft2/sec2)gHm0 / u*
2 gTp / u*Hm0 (ft) Tp (sec)
0.01 36 1.303 90.8 0.09 44.76 0.8 4.8 1.14 0.99
0.1 360 1.078 75.2 0.09 27.69 1.0 5.6 0.90 0.91
0.111 399.6 1.072 74.7 0.09 27.28 1.0 5.6 0.89 0.91
0.112 403.2 1.071 74.7 0.09 27.24 1.1 5.6 0.89 0.91
0.113 406.8 1.071 74.7 0.09 27.21 1.1 5.6 0.89 0.91
0.5 1800 1.012 70.6 0.10 23.63 1.1 5.9 0.83 0.89
1 3600 1.000 69.7 0.10 22.90 1.1 6.0 0.81 0.89
2 7200 0.955 66.6 0.10 20.42 1.2 6.2 0.77 0.87
4 14400 0.910 63.4 0.10 18.11 1.3 6.4 0.72 0.85
6 21600 0.883 61.6 0.10 16.84 1.3 6.6 0.70 0.84
8 28800 0.864 60.3 0.10 15.97 1.4 6.7 0.68 0.83
10 36000 0.850 59.3 0.10 15.32 1.4 6.8 0.67 0.83
gX / u*
2 X (mi)gHm0 / u*
2 gTp / u*Hm0 (ft) Tp (sec)Limitation Hm0 (ft) Tp (sec)
0.01 12 0.0 0.1 1.5 0.20 0.31 Duration 0.20 0.31
0.1 541 0.1 1.0 5.3 0.83 0.87 Duration 0.83 0.87
0.111 640 0.1 1.0 5.6 0.88 0.91 Duration 0.88 0.91
0.112 649 0.1 1.1 5.6 0.89 0.91 Fetch 0.89 0.91
0.113 658 0.1 1.1 5.7 0.90 0.92 Fetch 0.89 0.91
0.5 6808 0.9 3.4 12.3 2.50 1.86 Fetch 0.83 0.89
1 19718 2.7 5.8 17.6 4.12 2.61 Fetch 0.81 0.89
2 60767 7.3 10.2 25.6 6.46 3.59 Fetch 0.77 0.87
4 188086 20.0 17.9 37.3 10.07 4.93 Fetch 0.72 0.85
6 364928 36.1 24.9 46.5 13.05 5.93 Fetch 0.70 0.84
8 584561 54.9 31.6 54.4 15.66 6.76 Fetch 0.68 0.83
10 842909 76.0 37.9 61.5 18.04 7.48 Fetch 0.67 0.83
Controlling hindcast wave: Fetch-limited
Hmo = 0.89 feet
Tp =0.91 sec
Limiting wave period:Tp = 9.78 (d/g)0.5 =5.36 sec
Period OK, use deepwater values
Limiting wave height: 0.6*d = 5.8 feet
Wave height OK
Controlling Conditions
Wind Velocity and Duration
Duration-Limited ConditionsDuration, t
(hr)
Fetch-Limited Conditions
Freeboard_Process Ponds.xls WaveRunup ProcessNorth 11/21/2008 10:50 AM
Page 11 of 12
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:Process Pond Freeboard Calculations APPROVED: SHEET:
114-181692
11/21/2008
Check Maximum Breaking Wave:
Fig 2-2 of EM 1110-2-1614, or SPM Fig 7-4, gives the maximum breaker height, Hb:
Nearshore slope, m:
Assume nearshore slope, m =0.000 ft/ft (tailings surface assumed level)
Depth at structure, d s :
Operating water depth = 8.00 ft
Rise due to PMF series = 1.67 ft
Wind setup = 0.06 ft
Depth at structure, ds =9.73 ft
Controlling wave height:
Wave period, T = 0.91 sec
ds / gT2 =0.3629
Not used Hs / Hmo = exp [C0 ( d / gTp
2 )-C1] Where C0=0.00089 (0.00136 conservative) & C1=0.834
Not used Hs / Hmo =1.003
Not used Hs =0.89
Hb / ds =0.78 (EM 1110-2-1614, Fig 2-2, "Design Breaker Height,"
Maximum breaker height, Hb =7.59 ft at T
or SPM Fig 7-4, at computed m and ds/gT2.)
Hindcast wave height, Hm0 = 0.89 feet
Controlling wave height, H =0.89 feet (Hindcast wave height controls)
Check maximum breaker height at a variety of wave periods other than the hindcast period (after CETN-III-2):
Typical range of periods from 0.5*T to 1.9*T = 0.46 sec to 0.82 sec
Assumed
T* (sec)ds / gT2 Hb / ds Hb (ft)Use for design:
0.46 1.4515 0.78 7.6 at 0% slope H = 0.89 feet
0.82 0.4480 0.78 7.6 at 0% slope
Tp =0.91 sec
5.36 0.0105 0.78 7.6 at 0% slope
5.36 0.0105 1.2 11.7 at 10% slope (assumed max; not actual)
10.00 0.0030 0.8 7.8 at 0% slope
*5.36 sec is the limiting period, computed above.
Freeboard_Process Ponds.xls WaveRunup ProcessNorth 11/21/2008 10:50 AM
Page 12 of 12
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:Process Pond Freeboard Calculations APPROVED: SHEET:
114-181692
11/21/2008
Check Wave Runup:
Input data:
Design wave height, Hmo =0.89 feet
Design wave period, Tp =0.91 sec
Revetment slope, cot θ =3 Process pond interior slope is 3H:1V
Equations:
Maximum runup by irregular waves on riprap covered revetments is estimated by:
a ξ (Eq 2-6 in EM 1110-2-1614)
1 + b ξ
where
Rmax =maximum vertical height of runup above swl
a, b = regression coefficients determined as 1.022 and 0.247, respectively
The more conservative value of a = 1.286 is used here.
ξ =surf parameter defined by:
Results for slopes other than riprap or quarrystone can be adjusted by the factors in Table 2-2 of
EM-1110-2-1614. See pages 2-6 & 2-7 of that manual for details.
The surf parameter equation above is equivalent to that in CEM, Eqn II-4-1.
For quarrystone at 3:1 slope, Rough slope runup correction factor r = 0.615
Calculations:
ξ =0.73
Rmax / Hmo =0.80
Rmax =0.71 feet
Wave runup, Rmax / r =1.15 feet
( 2 π Hmo / g Tp
2 ) 1/2
tan θ
Rmax / Hmo =
ξ =
Freeboard_Process Ponds.xls WaveRunup ProcessNorth 11/21/2008 10:50 AM
Page 1 of 9
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:OS1-5 (above Divider Berm) Freeboard Calculations APPROVED: SHEET:
Catchment Area and Design Flood Volume:
The 100-year design storm from the offsite area west of the TSF (west bluff) will be diverted to the area
OS1-5, which is the sump formed between the proposed divider berm and the existing cross-valley berm.
OS1-5 will be pumped out periodically to prevent water accumulation, but wave protection must be provided
on the north side of the Divider Berm, up to the 100-year conditions.
100-year, 6-hour precipitation (in) = 1.79 (NOAA Atlas 14 rainfall, reproduced below)
Assumed runoff coefficient = 0.90
Runoff depth (in) = 1.61 (Runoff depth = Total precipitation x Runoff coefficient)
6 12 24 48 192
1 0.55 0.67 0.79 0.88 1
2 0.69 0.83 1 1.11 1.26
5 0.89 1.05 1.29 1.42 1.62
10 1.06 1.23 1.53 1.68 1.91
25 1.31 1.49 1.86 2.06 2.32
50 1.52 1.69 2.12 2.36 2.65
100 1.79 1.91 2.4 2.69 3.01
200 2.14 2.2 2.7 3.03 3.38
500 2.71 2.74 3.11 3.53 3.92
1000 3.24 3.27 3.44 3.93 4.34
* ARI = Approximate Recurrence Interval
Location:OS1-5 Elev (ft) Area (ac)
Volume
(ac-ft)
Cell Area (ac): 14.78 (OS1-5, including W1-29) 4394 0.023 0
Outside Area Contributing Runon (ac): 22.85 (West bluff, up to W1-28) 4400 0.302 0.98
Total Area (ac): 37.63 4404 0.510 2.60
Runoff volume (ac-ft): 5.05 4410 1.065 7.33
Elevation for 100-year volume (ft): 4407.11 (interpolated from table at right) 4416 1.929 16.31
Bottom elevation (ft): 4394.0 4420 2.899 25.97
Assumed operating WSE (ft): 4394.0 (no prior storage before event) 4430 5.352 67.22
Surface area at operating WSE (ac): 0.80 (interpolated from table at right)
WSE rise due to design flood (ft): 13.11
Runoff volume [ac-ft] = Total Area [ac] * Runoff depth [in] / 12 [in/foot]
WSE = W ater Surface Elevation
114-181692
ARI*
(years)
Duration (hours)
11/21/2008
Freeboard_Above Divider Berm.xls Overall Freeboard 11/21/2008 10:53 AM
Page 2 of 9
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:OS1-5 (above Divider Berm) Freeboard Calculations APPROVED: SHEET:
114-181692
11/21/2008
Windspeed, fetch, and wind setup
Fetch:
Wind setup is typically calculated using roughly twice the effective fetch, but here the straight-line fetch
was determined directly, so no adjustments to effective fetch are required.
Straight-line fetch was measured as the longest distance across the 4410 contour in any direction.
This method is conservative because it ignores the possibility that the design windspeed may
not necessarily occur along the measured fetch.
Water depth over fetch was assumed constant, at the 100-year storage level (conservative for wave runup).
Location:OS1-5
WSE Rise due to design flood (ft): 13.11
Assumed operating WSE (ft): 4394.00
Avg. pond bottom elev (ft): 4394.00
Operating water depth (ft): 0.00
Fetch (ft): 457
Fetch (mi): 0.09
Fastest-mile wind speed:
Design wind at 100 -year recurrence interval, based on adjustment of 50-year windspeed.
50-year windspeed based on Figure 1 in ANSI/ASCE 7-93 "Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and
Other Structures".
Use importance factor, I = 1.07, for "essential facilities" (Category III), which has the effect of converting the
50-year windspeed to a 100-year value.
Revisions to ANSI/ASCE 7-93 requiring use of the 3-second gust instead of the fastest-mile windspeed are
not applicable to reservoir wind-wave effects analysis in general, or this case in particular. For the present
analysis, the duration of the controlling windspeed is between 0.2 and 0.3 hours (see individual cell-phase
calculation sheets). Short gusts do not control wave growth.
Fastest-mile 10-m overland windspeed, V = 70.00 mph
Importance factor to obtain 100-year windspeed, I = 1.07 (Exposure Class C)
Use 100-yr fastest-mile wind speed, I x V = 75 mph (rounded)
= 110.0 fps
Freeboard_Above Divider Berm.xls Overall Freeboard 11/21/2008 10:53 AM
Page 3 of 9
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:OS1-5 (above Divider Berm) Freeboard Calculations APPROVED: SHEET:
114-181692
11/21/2008
Adjustments to Wind Speed
See CEM II-2-1-i.(3), "Procedure for adjusting observed winds" for figures & detailed explanation of methods.
Level:
U10 = Uz (10/z)1/7 For z < 20 m; z must be in meters
Use CEM Fig II-2-6 if air-sea temperature data is available, or if z exceeds 20 meters
Assume wind speed read at 10 m; no correction required
U / U10 =1.0 for measurements taken at 10 m
U10 = Uf / (U / U10) =75.00 mph
Location (overland or overwater):
Location and stability adjustments are applied after duration adjustments in the table below
Use CEM Fig II-2-7 for windspeed measurements taken over land
RL = UW / UL =1.2 for winds blowing off the water
If fetch < 10 miles & wind data is taken over land, UW = 1.2 UL, and RT is not applied (equivalent to RL = RT = 1.1).
This applies here; fetches do not exceed 1 mile.
Boundary layer stability:
Location and stability adjustments are applied after duration adjustments in the table below
Use CEM Fig II-2-8 when air-sea temperature difference is known; RT = 1.1 otherwise
No air-sea temperature information is available; therefore
RT = WC / WW =1.0 RT is not applicable to fetches < 10 miles.
Adjusted fastest-mile windspeed, Uf(adj) = U10 * RL * RT =90.00 mph = 132.00 fps
40.23 m/s
Duration:
Equation from CEM Fig II-2-2 (SPM Fig 3-12), Duration of the fastest mile windspeed as a function of windspeed:
t = 3600 / Uf (Uf in mph)
Equations from CEM Fig II-2-1 (SPM Fig. 3-13), Ratio of windspeed of any duration Ut to the 1-hour windspeed U3600:
1.277 + 0.296 tanh [0.9 log10 (45/t)]1 sec < t < 3,600 sec
-0.15 log10 t + 1.5334 3,600 sec < t < 36,000 sec
Return
Period (yr)Uf(adj) (mph)t (sec)Ut / U3,600
U3,600
(mph)U3,600 (fps)
100 90.00 40.0 1.291 69.7 102.3
Duration is further modified during determination of the design wave conditions.
Ut / U3,600 =
Freeboard_Above Divider Berm.xls Overall Freeboard 11/21/2008 10:53 AM
Page 4 of 9
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:OS1-5 (above Divider Berm) Freeboard Calculations APPROVED: SHEET:
114-181692
11/21/2008
Wind Setup:
Use Zuider-Zee formula, from EM-1110-2-1420 "Hydrologic Engineering Requirements for Dams" (31 Oct 97)
U2 F
1400 D
S = Wind tide (setup)
U = Average wind velocity over the fetch (fastest-mile, adjusted to overwater value)
F = Fetch
D = Average depth of water along the fetch line
U = 90.0 mph (fastest-mile speed, adjusted to overwater value)
Location:OS1-5
Fetch, F (mi): 0.09
WSE Rise due to design flood (ft): 13.11
Operating water depth (ft): 0.00
Design water depth, D (ft): 13.11
Wind setup, S (ft): 0.04
Wind setup is not included in water depth for computation of the design wave height,
but is used to compute the wave runup at the shoreline
Design Wave & Wave Runup:
See sheets for individual Cell-Phase combinations for design wave and wave runup computations.
Total Freeboard
Total freeboard is the sum of the rise due to the design flood, wind setup, and wave runup.
Location:OS1-5
Elevation for 100-year volume (ft): 4407.11
Wind setup (ft): 0.04
Wave runup (ft): 0.75
Elevation of flood + wind-wave effects (ft): 4407.90
Use: rounded up to the next half-foot (ft): 4408.00 Apply 6" riprap slope protection up to elevation 4408.
S =
Freeboard_Above Divider Berm.xls Overall Freeboard 11/21/2008 10:53 AM
Page 5 of 9
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:OS1-5 (above Divider Berm) Freeboard Calculations APPROVED: SHEET:
Design Wave Conditions, Offsite area OS1-5:
Inputs:
Use:
Adjusted 100-yr, 1-hr windspeed, U3600 =69.7 mph 102.3 fps
Effective fetch, X = 0.09 miles = 457 ft (use straight-line fetch, conservative)
Water depth, d = 13.11 feet (minimum operating depth + design storm rise)
Equations:
CEM now recommends computing deepwater wave heights for shallow water, subject to the limiting wave
period given by CEM Eq II-2-39, and a limiting height of 0.6 times the depth. See pp. II-2-45 through 47.
Time required for waves crossing a fetch X under a velocity u to become fetch-limited (CEM Eq II-2-35):
77.23 X0.67 CEM Fig II-2-3, "Equivalent duration for wave generation
u0.34 g0.33 as a function of fetch and wind speed," gives the same
same information graphically for fetches up to 10 km.
Limiting wave period in shallow water:
Tp = 9.78 (d/g)1/2 CEM Eq II-2-39
Equations governing wave growth with fetch (CEM Eq II-2-36):
gHmo / u*
2 = 0.0413 ( g X / u*
2 )1/2
gTp / u* = 0.651 ( g X / u*
2 )1/3
CD =u*
2 / U10
2
CD =0.001 (1.1 + 0.035 U10) (Requires U10 in m/s)
where
X = straight line fetch distance over which the wind blows
Hmo =energy-based significant wave height
Tp =frequency
CD =drag coefficient
U10 =wind speed at 10 m elevation
u* =friction velocity
The fully-developed wave height is given by CEM Eq II-2-30:
H: = λ5 u2 / g = 0.27 u2 / 32.2 (u in ft/s)
The fully-developed wave height (upper limit to wave growth for any wind speed) is given by CEM Eq II-2-30:
gHm0 / u*
2 = 211.5
gTp / u* = 239.8
For duration-limited conditions, duration is converted into an equivalent fetch using CEM Eq II-2-38:
gX / u*
2 = 0.00523 ( g t / u* )3/2 (where t is the duration)
114-181692
11/21/2008
tx,u =
Freeboard_Above Divider Berm.xls WaveRunup 11/21/2008 10:53 AM
Page 6 of 9
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:OS1-5 (above Divider Berm) Freeboard Calculations APPROVED: SHEET:
114-181692
11/21/2008
Calculations:
Duration, t
(hr)t (sec)Ut / U3,600 Ut (mph) tx,u (hrs)u*
2
(ft2/sec2)gHm0 / u*
2 gTp / u*Hm0 (ft) Tp (sec)
0.01 36 1.303 90.8 0.08 44.76 0.7 4.5 1.04 0.93
0.05 180 1.131 78.8 0.08 31.21 0.9 5.1 0.87 0.88
0.098 352.8 1.080 75.3 0.08 27.78 1.0 5.3 0.82 0.86
0.099 356.4 1.079 75.2 0.08 27.73 1.0 5.3 0.82 0.86
0.1 360 1.078 75.2 0.08 27.69 1.0 5.3 0.82 0.86
0.5 1800 1.012 70.6 0.09 23.63 1.0 5.6 0.76 0.84
1 3600 1.000 69.7 0.09 22.90 1.0 5.6 0.74 0.83
2 7200 0.955 66.6 0.09 20.42 1.1 5.8 0.70 0.82
4 14400 0.910 63.4 0.09 18.11 1.2 6.1 0.66 0.80
6 21600 0.883 61.6 0.09 16.84 1.2 6.2 0.64 0.79
8 28800 0.864 60.3 0.09 15.97 1.3 6.3 0.62 0.79
10 36000 0.850 59.3 0.09 15.32 1.3 6.4 0.61 0.78
gX / u*
2 X (mi)gHm0 / u*
2 gTp / u*Hm0 (ft) Tp (sec)Limitation Hm0 (ft) Tp (sec)
0.01 12 0.0 0.1 1.5 0.20 0.31 Duration 0.20 0.31
0.05 175 0.0 0.5 3.6 0.53 0.63 Duration 0.53 0.63
0.098 523 0.1 0.9 5.2 0.82 0.86 Duration 0.82 0.86
0.099 532 0.1 1.0 5.3 0.82 0.86 Fetch 0.82 0.86
0.1 541 0.1 1.0 5.3 0.83 0.87 Fetch 0.82 0.86
0.5 6808 0.9 3.4 12.3 2.50 1.86 Fetch 0.76 0.84
1 19718 2.7 5.8 17.6 4.12 2.61 Fetch 0.74 0.83
2 60767 7.3 10.2 25.6 6.46 3.59 Fetch 0.70 0.82
4 188086 20.0 17.9 37.3 10.07 4.93 Fetch 0.66 0.80
6 364928 36.1 24.9 46.5 13.05 5.93 Fetch 0.64 0.79
8 584561 54.9 31.6 54.4 15.66 6.76 Fetch 0.62 0.79
10 842909 76.0 37.9 61.5 18.04 7.48 Fetch 0.61 0.78
Controlling hindcast wave: Fetch-limited
Hmo = 0.82 feet
Tp =0.86 sec
Limiting wave period:Tp = 9.78 (d/g)0.5 =6.24 sec
Period OK, use deepwater values
Limiting wave height: 0.6*d = 7.9 feet
Wave height OK
Wind Velocity and Duration
Duration-Limited ConditionsDuration, t
(hr)
Fetch-Limited Conditions
Controlling Conditions
Freeboard_Above Divider Berm.xls WaveRunup 11/21/2008 10:53 AM
Page 7 of 9
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:OS1-5 (above Divider Berm) Freeboard Calculations APPROVED: SHEET:
114-181692
11/21/2008
Check Maximum Breaking Wave:
Fig 2-2 of EM 1110-2-1614, or SPM Fig 7-4, gives the maximum breaker height, Hb:
Nearshore slope, m:
Assume nearshore slope, m =0.000 ft/ft (tailings surface assumed level)
Depth at structure, d s :
Operating water depth = 0.00 ft
Rise due to design flood = 13.11 ft
Wind setup = 0.04 ft
Depth at structure, ds =13.15 ft
Controlling wave height:
Wave period, T = 0.86 sec
ds / gT2 =0.5495
Not used Hs / Hmo = exp [C0 ( d / gTp
2 )-C1] Where C0=0.00089 (0.00136 conservative) & C1=0.834
Not used Hs / Hmo =1.002
Not used Hs =0.82
Hb / ds =0.78 (EM 1110-2-1614, Fig 2-2, "Design Breaker Height,"
Maximum breaker height, Hb =10.25 ft at T
or SPM Fig 7-4, at computed m and ds/gT2.)
Hindcast wave height, Hm0 = 0.82 feet
Controlling wave height, H =0.82 feet (Hindcast wave height controls)
Check maximum breaker height at a variety of wave periods other than the hindcast period (after CETN-III-2):
Typical range of periods from 0.5*T to 1.9*T = 0.43 sec to 0.78 sec
Assumed
T* (sec)ds / gT2 Hb / ds Hb (ft)Use for design:
0.43 2.1981 0.78 10.3 at 0% slope H = 0.82 feet
0.78 0.6784 0.78 10.3 at 0% slope
Tp =0.86 sec
6.24 0.0105 0.78 10.3 at 0% slope
6.24 0.0105 1.2 15.8 at 10% slope (assumed max; not actual)
10.00 0.0041 0.8 10.5 at 0% slope
*6.24 sec is the limiting period, computed above.
Freeboard_Above Divider Berm.xls WaveRunup 11/21/2008 10:53 AM
Page 8 of 9
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:OS1-5 (above Divider Berm) Freeboard Calculations APPROVED: SHEET:
114-181692
11/21/2008
Check Wave Runup:
Input data:
Design wave height, Hmo =0.82 feet
Design wave period, Tp =0.86 sec
Revetment slope, cot θ =2.5 Divider berm north slope is 2.5H:1V.
Equations:
Maximum runup by irregular waves on riprap covered revetments is estimated by:
a ξ (Eq 2-6 in EM 1110-2-1614)
1 + b ξ
where
Rmax =maximum vertical height of runup above swl
a, b = regression coefficients determined as 1.022 and 0.247, respectively
The more conservative value of a = 1.286 is used here.
ξ =surf parameter defined by:
Results for slopes other than riprap or quarrystone can be adjusted by the factors in Table 2-2 of
EM-1110-2-1614. See pages 2-6 & 2-7 of that manual for details.
The surf parameter equation above is equivalent to that in CEM, Eqn II-4-1.
For riprap at 2.5:1 slope, no additional correction is needed. Rough slope runup correction factor r = 1.00
Calculations:
ξ =0.86
Rmax / Hmo =0.91
Rmax =0.75 feet
Wave runup, Rmax / r =0.75 feet
Rmax / Hmo =
ξ =( 2 π Hmo / g Tp
2 ) 1/2
tan θ
Freeboard_Above Divider Berm.xls WaveRunup 11/21/2008 10:53 AM
Page 9 of 9
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:OS1-5 (above Divider Berm) Freeboard Calculations APPROVED: SHEET:
114-181692
11/21/2008
Armor Stone Sizing
Equations:
Using Hudson's equation (1961) for armor sizing:
SPM Eqn 7-116 /
EM 1110-2-1614 Eqn 2-15
where
W 50 =Required individual armor unit weight, lb
H = monochromatic wave height
γr =specific weight of armor unit, lb/ft3
γw =specific weight of water at the site (salt or fresh), lb/f3
KD =stability coefficient given in Table 2-3 of EM 1110-2-1614
cotθ = structure slope (from the horizontal)
Layer thickness:
r =n kΔ ( W / γr )1/3 SPM Eqn 7-121
n = Number of median stones thick = 2
KD =2.20 for graded riprap
Calculations:
H = 0.82 ft
γr =150 lb/ft3
cotθ = 2.5
KD =2.2
γw =62.4 lb/ft3
(γr/γw-1)1.40
W 50 =5.4 lbs
Volume =0.036 ft3
Spherical D50 =0.4 ft
4.9 in Use approximately 5" riprap, 10" thick.
KD(γr/γw-1)3cotθW50 =γrH3
Freeboard_Above Divider Berm.xls WaveRunup 11/21/2008 10:53 AM

APPENDIX H.3
SURFACE WATER YIELD CALCULATIONS

Page 1 of 1
CLIENT:Uranium One MADE BY:EKB DATE:
JOB TITLE:Shootaring Mill Operations CHECKED: JOB NUMBER:
SUBJECT:Monthly surface water yield for tailings water balance APPROVED: SHEET:
Tailings Storage Facility (TSF) contributing areas:
Location Area (ft2)Area (ac)
TSF 1367637 31.40
Mill 1448190 33.25
Total Area for Runon*: 33.25
*Area contributing surface water to the tailings cell, exclusive of lined cell area.
During operations, the east and west bluffs are diverted away from the TSF, and do not contribute.
Cliffs* Other** Cliffs* Other** Cliffs* Other**
Jan 0.47 3.10 0.25 0.15 0.118 0.071 0.35 0.40
Feb 0.42 2.90 0.25 0.15 0.105 0.063 0.32 0.36
Mar 0.75 3.10 0.30 0.20 0.225 0.150 0.53 0.60
Apr 0.10 3.20 0.20 0.10 0.020 0.010 0.08 0.09
May 0.18 3.70 0.20 0.10 0.036 0.018 0.14 0.16
Jun 0.25 5.10 0.20 0.10 0.050 0.025 0.20 0.23
Jul 0.33 7.80 0.20 0.10 0.066 0.033 0.26 0.30
Aug 1.12 9.60 0.60 0.45 0.672 0.504 0.45 0.62
Sep 1.16 9.60 0.60 0.45 0.696 0.522 0.46 0.64
Oct 0.98 8.10 0.60 0.45 0.588 0.441 0.39 0.54
Nov 0.61 5.60 0.30 0.20 0.183 0.122 0.43 0.49
Dec 0.37 3.70 0.25 0.15 0.093 0.056 0.28 0.31
Total: 6.74 65.50 Annual Total: 2.851 2.014 3.889 4.726
Average Runoff Coefficient: 0.423 0.299
Cliffs* Other** Total
Jan 0.000 0.195 0.195
Feb 0.000 0.175 0.175
Mar 0.000 0.416 0.416
Apr 0.000 0.028 0.028
May 0.000 0.050 0.050
Jun 0.000 0.069 0.069
Jul 0.000 0.091 0.091
Aug 0.000 1.396 1.396
Sep 0.000 1.446 1.446
Oct 0.000 1.222 1.222
Nov 0.000 0.338 0.338
Dec 0.000 0.154 0.154
Total: 0.000 5.580 5.580
*Cliffs include the west bluff, consisting of Dakota and Entrada sandstone, slope varying 1.5:1 to vertical, and some talus.
Under the new TSF design concept, these cliff areas do not contribute runoff to the TSF during operations, but do for the PMP.
**Other areas include the mill site, which includes wind-eroded sandstone, wind-deposited sandy soils, and residual soils
on the east bluff.
11/20/2008
114-181692
Losses (in)
Month
Runoff Volume (ac-ft)
TSF Contributing Areas
Evap (in)Month Runoff (in)Runoff CoefficientPrecip (in)
1 of 1
Freeboard_Tailings.xls Surface Water Yield 11/20/2008 5:06 PM

URANIUM ONE USA, INC

SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM MILL
TAILINGS STORAGE FACILITY
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS AND
QUALITY CONTROL/QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN

DECEMBER 2008

Submitted to

Utah Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Radiation Control
P.O. Box 144810
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4810

Submitted by

Uranium One USA, Inc.
3801 Automation Way, Suite 100
Fort Collins, Colorado 80525

Shootaring Canyon Technical Specifications i
TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 SCOPE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS................................................................................1
1.1 Scope...................................................................................................................................1
1.2 General Technical Requirements........................................................................................1
1.3 Submittals...........................................................................................................................1
1.4 Definition of Terms ............................................................................................................2
1.5 Applicable Regulations, Standards, and References...........................................................2
1.6 Modifications, Alternatives, and Exceptions......................................................................2
1.7 Inspection and Construction Quality Assurance.................................................................3
1.8 Surface Water and Sediment Control .................................................................................3
1.9 Dust Control........................................................................................................................3
2.0 EARTHWORK................................................................................................................................4
2.1 Clearing, Grubbing, and Stripping......................................................................................4
2.2 Excavation ..........................................................................................................................4
2.2.1 South Cell Impoundment and Dam, and Process Ponds........................................4
2.2.2 Anchor Trenches....................................................................................................5
2.2.3 Contaminated Materials.........................................................................................5
2.2.4 Borrow Sources......................................................................................................5
2.3 Stockpiling..........................................................................................................................5
2.4 Subgrade Preparation..........................................................................................................5
2.5 Construction of Fills and Material Classifications..............................................................6
2.5.1 General Requirements............................................................................................6
2.5.2 Random Fill Materials...........................................................................................7
2.5.3 Compacted Clay Liner Materials...........................................................................7
2.5.4 Drainage Gravel.....................................................................................................9
2.5.5 Filter Sand............................................................................................................10
2.5.6 Anchor Trench Backfill.......................................................................................10
2.5.7 Riprap ..................................................................................................................11
2.5.8 Road Base............................................................................................................12
2.5.9 Contaminated Materials.......................................................................................13
2.5.10 Unclassified Materials .........................................................................................13
3.0 GEOSYNTHETICS.......................................................................................................................14
3.1 Geosynthetics Labeling, Transportation, Handling, and Storage .....................................14
3.2 Geomembrane...................................................................................................................14
3.2.1 Geomembrane Material Requirements................................................................15
3.2.2 Geomembrane Deployment and Installation .......................................................16
3.3 Geonet...............................................................................................................................20
3.3.1 Geonet Material Requirements............................................................................21
3.3.2 Geonet Placement and Installation.......................................................................21
3.4 Geotextile..........................................................................................................................21
3.4.1 Geotextile Material Requirements.......................................................................22
3.4.2 Geotextile Placement and Installation .................................................................22
3.5 HDPE Pipe........................................................................................................................22
3.5.1 HDPE Pipe Material Requirements.....................................................................22
3.5.2 HDPE Pipe Installation........................................................................................23
4.0 CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN..................................................................24
4.1 General..............................................................................................................................24
4.2 Earthwork CQA................................................................................................................24
4.2.1 Clearing, Grubbing, and Stripping.......................................................................24

Shootaring Canyon Technical Specifications ii
4.2.2 Excavation, Grading, and Subgrade Preparation.................................................24
4.2.3 Fill Materials and Construction ...........................................................................25
4.3 Geosynthetics CQA ..........................................................................................................26
4.3.1 Geosynthetics Manufacturing Quality Control and Conformance Testing..........26

LIST OF TABLES

Table 2.1. Material Property Requirements for Constituent Clay and Sand
Table 2.2. Particle-size Requirements for Drainage Gravel
Table 2.3. Particle-size Requirements for Filter Sand
Table 2.4. Ungrouted Riprap Particle-size Requirements
Table 3.1. Geomembrane Material Property Requirements
Table 3.2. Geonet Material Property Requirements
Table 3.3. Geotextile Material Property Requirements
Table 4.1. Tests Frequencies for Fill Materials and Construction
Table 4.2. Geomembrane MQC and CQA Testing Frequencies
Table 4.3. Geonet MQC and CQA Testing Frequencies
Table 4.4. Geotextile MQC and CQA Testing Frequencies

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix A Compaction Diagram for Compacted Clay Liner
Appendix B Procedures for Sealed Single-Ring Infiltrometer (SSRI) Testing

Shootaring Canyon Technical Specifications 1
1.0 SCOPE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
1.1 Scope
The scope of these Specifications is to set out the requirements and procedures necessary to complete the
construction of earthwork and geosynthetics for the Shootaring Canyon Uranium Mill Tailings Storage
Facility (TSF). These specifications have been prepared for Uranium One USA, Inc. (Uranium One) for
review by the State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Radiation Control (DRC).
These Specifications will become part of contract(s) for construction of the facility by contractors selected
by and under contract with Uranium One.

The work scope generally includes the following: site preparation, fill placement, geosynthetics
installation, pipework installation, and associated construction monitoring, inspection and testing.
Operational aspects related to the mill facilities and associated structures are not part of these
Specifications. Specific features of the work scope include, but are not limited to the following:

• Clearing, grubbing and stripping in required areas;
• Excavation in required areas;
• Development of borrow areas within and outside the TSF limits;
• Construction of temporary and permanent access roads;
• Foundation preparation for site grading fill and compacted clay liner construction;
• Fill placement and compaction;
• Installation of geosynthetic materials for secondary and primary liners, leachate collection and
leak detection systems;
• Furnishing and installing all materials and constructing all items appurtenant and incidental to the
above; and,
• Summarized in an as-built report all earthwork and geosynthetic construction monitoring,
inspection, and testing.

1.2 General Technical Requirements
General technical requirements as indicated in these Specifications shall apply to all activities and
operations relating to performing Work or as required by the Engineer or Owner. In the event of a
contradiction in the Technical Specifications and Drawings, the Contractor shall refer all questions to the
Engineer for final decision. Work that concerns the contradiction shall not be performed until the
contradiction is remedied or explained by the Engineer. In all events, the decision of the Engineer is
final.

1.3 Submittals
The Contractor shall provide the Owner and Engineer with written procedures and a list of equipment to
be used construction and documentation or certification of materials meeting the requirements in these
Specifications. This is required for review and approval prior to the Work being allowed to commence
and/or the materials brought to the Site. Specific submittals or submittal requirements are stated in the
applicable sections of these Specifications.

Shootaring Canyon Technical Specifications 2
1.4 Definition of Terms
“Owner” is defined as an authorized representative of Uranium One, USA.

“Engineer” is defined as representative appointed and authorized by the Owner. The Engineer shall be a
Registered Professional Engineer or a designated site representative under the supervision of a Registered
Professional Engineer.

“Contractor” is defined as the party which has executed a contract agreement with the Owner for the
specified Work. This includes the Earthwork Contractor, Geosynthetics Installer, and Pipework Installer.

“Technical Specifications or Specifications” is defined as this document, prepared by Tetra Tech (Tt), and
all supplemental addenda.

“Drawings” are defined as the Drawings, in conjunction with these Technical Specifications.

“Work” is defined as the entire completed construction, or the various separately identifiable parts
thereof, required to be furnished under the Contract Documents.

“Site” is defined as the project area where the Work is to be performed.

“Modifications” are defined as changes made to the Technical Specifications or the Drawings that are
approved by the Owner and Engineer in writing after the Technical Specifications and Drawings have
been issued for construction.

“ASTM” is defined as the latest versions of the American Society for Testing and Materials
specifications, procedures and methods.

1.5 Applicable Regulations, Standards, and References
All work shall conform to applicable Federal, State, and County environmental and safety regulations,
and applicable conditions as indicated in the license (UT-0900480) with the DRC. Construction
monitoring and QA testing shall be in accordance with the current version of the applicable ASTM
standards or other industry standards. Personnel safety procedures and monitoring shall be conducted in
accordance with the site specific Health and Safety Plan.

1.6 Modifications, Alternatives, and Exceptions
Design and/or Specification modifications may be required during construction due to unanticipated site
conditions and/or field-based improvements to the design. Any such modifications shall be made with the
written agreement of the Owner, Engineer, and/or applicable regulatory agency(ies). Any Contractor
alternatives or exceptions to the Drawings and/or Technical Specifications shall be submitted in writing to
the Engineer and/or Owner and shall require approval as a modification prior to implementation. Any
modifications will take the form of an addendum to the Specifications and/or Drawings and will be
documented in the final as-built construction report of the facility

Shootaring Canyon Technical Specifications 3
1.7 Inspection and Construction Quality Assurance
Full-time, on-site inspection and construction quality assurance (CQA) testing outlined in these
Specifications shall be conducted by the Owner's Engineer as work progresses. Inspection and CQA
testing shall be under the supervision of the Engineer and shall be documented on a daily basis.
Inspection and CQA testing shall include the tasks listed below:

1. Observation of construction practices and procedures for conformance with the
Specifications;
2. Testing earthwork construction materials and placement for conformance to the
Specifications;
3. Testing geosynthetic materials and installation for conformance to the Specifications;
4. Documentation of construction activities, test locations, samples, and test results;
5. Notifying the Owner and Contractor(s) of CQA test results; and,
6. Documentation of field design modifications or approved construction work that deviates
from the Specifications.
1.8 Surface Water and Sediment Control
Appropriate control measures shall be implemented to maintain acceptable construction conditions and to
protect areas of completed work from surface water runoff resulting from precipitation. These temporary
features shall be installed as necessary to the satisfaction of the Owner and/or Engineer. The diversion
and/or collection of surface water runoff within work areas and the TSF footprint will require special
consideration for the existing tailings, ore, and otherwise contaminated soils as shown on the Drawings.
Contaminated water shall not be used for any portion of construction or related activities.

Erosion protection shall be provided for the prepared fill surfaces in drainages and other potential erosion
areas. The level and methods of temporary erosion protection are subject to the approval of the Engineer.
Any temporary or permanent earthen material stockpiles shall be graded and maintained so as to
minimize erosion of material from the slopes. Erosion protection or features shall prevent release of
excessive sediments or other materials into drainage systems and water courses downstream or outside of
each work area or limits of the Site. Surface water released from the Site shall meet all requirements of
any applicable regulatory agencies.

Design and installation of surface water and/or erosion control products shall be according to the
recommendations of the manufacturer. Regular maintenance of all surface water and sediment control
features shall be performed as necessary during construction.

1.9 Dust Control
Appropriate measures shall be implemented to control and reduce dust generated due to the construction
of the TSF or any appurtenant features. The degree of dust control shall be acceptable to the Engineer,
Owner, and/or any applicable regulatory agencies. Any water used for dust control shall be obtained from
wells, collected surface water runoff, and/or other sources approved by the Engineer or Owner. Any
chemical dust suppressants shall be approved by the Engineer.

Shootaring Canyon Technical Specifications 4
2.0 EARTHWORK
This section provides guidelines, descriptions, and technical requirements regarding earthwork
construction activities associated with the TSF and process ponds. These include preparation of work
areas; classifications, intended uses, and requirements of the various earthen construction materials;
construction of fills; equipment and methods; and inspection and testing. All earthwork construction
materials and methods shall meet the requirements in these Specifications, and shall be inspected,
sampled, and tested by the Engineer or designated representative in accordance with this section and the
CQA Plan.

2.1 Clearing, Grubbing, and Stripping
The ground surface within work areas shall be cleared, grubbed, and stripped of all organic and
deleterious materials to the limits shown on the Drawings or as directed by the Engineer. Clearing and
grubbing shall mean the removal of vegetation and roots, and stripping shall mean the removal of topsoil.
Clearing and grubbing shall be performed as a single operation together with stripping. All materials
from clearing, grubbing, and stripping shall be appropriately disposed of off-site or stockpiled in on-site
waste areas as directed by the Engineer. The overall amount of clearing, grubbing and stripping is
expected to be small due to the sparse vegetation and topsoil at the site.

Stripping shall be carried out using whatever method deemed necessary provided the method is consistent
with producing an acceptable end result as determined by the Engineer. The application of water shall be
used as necessary for dust control. The limits of stripping shall generally be 10 feet outside of the work
areas as shown on the Drawings or as directed by the Engineer. No stripping beyond the limits shown on
the Drawings shall be performed without the approval of the Owner and/or Engineer. The Engineer shall
be notified to inspect stripped areas prior to any subsequent preparation of the area.

2.2 Excavation
Excavation shall consist of excavating to the lines and grades shown on the Drawings and hauling
materials to designated fill, stockpile, or waste areas. Excavation methods, techniques, and procedures
shall be developed with due consideration of the nature of the materials to be excavated and shall include
all precautions that are necessary to preserve, in an undisturbed condition, all areas outside the lines and
grades shown on the Drawings. Excavation shall be carried out by whatever method considered most
suitable provided the method is consistent with producing an acceptable end result as determined by the
Engineer. No excavation beyond the lines and grades shown on the Drawings shall be performed without
the approval of the Owner and/or Engineer. With the exception of the existing contaminated materials
located within the impoundment area of the South Cell, the majority of the surficial deposits of
alluvial/eolian sands and exposed Entrada Sandstone (weathered and unweathered) are expected to be
salvageable.

2.2.1 South Cell Impoundment and Dam, and Process Ponds
In areas requiring fill, all loose, weathered, or otherwise disturbed/dislodged materials shall be excavated
down to hard competent sandstone as determine by the Engineer. In cut areas, all loose and/or weathered
materials shall be removed and the exposed sandstone further excavated to the lines and grades shown on
the Construction Drawings. In addition, the existing riprap on the upstream slope of the South Dam shall
be removed for reuse as riprap as required. All materials removed shall be stockpiled as directed by the
Engineer.

Shootaring Canyon Technical Specifications 5
2.2.2 Anchor Trenches
Anchor trenches shall be excavated to the lines and grades shown on the Drawings and in coordination
with other construction activities (i.e., compacted clay liner, geosynthetics installation). Completed
anchor trenches shall conform to the requirements in these Specifications. While open, anchor trenches
shall be adequately sloped and drained to prevent ponding of water or softening of the adjacent soils.
Anchor trenches shall be backfilled as required in these Specifications as soon as practically possible
following installation of the geosynthetic components of the liner system. Excavated materials shall be
used for anchor trench backfill provided the material requirements indicated in these Specifications are
met. Unsuitable materials excavated shall be stockpiled as directed by the Engineer.

2.2.3 Contaminated Materials
An estimated 25,000 cubic yards of contaminated soils are currently located within the South Cell as
shown on the Drawings. These soils will be removed and the exposed area shall be prepared as previously
indicated. The contaminated soils removed will be temporarily stored with an estimated 52,000 cubic
yards of tailings, ore, and 11-e(2) by-products currently located upstream of the existing cross-valley
berm as shown on the Drawings. All of the contaminated materials will be relocated to the South Cell for
permanent disposal when construction of the South Cell liner system is complete. Procedures for clean-up
and verification of areas with contaminated materials are provided in the Design Report.

2.2.4 Borrow Sources
The materials for the compacted clay liner will be obtained from two on-site borrow sources as shown in
the Drawings. The sand borrow source is a ridge of exposed Entrada Sandstone within the South Cell and
the clay borrow source is a stockpile of clay imported during previous construction activities and
currently located north of the South Cell. Limited clearing of the sand borrow source is expected, whereas
clearing of overlying sands and gravels placed as site grading fill during previous construction activities
will be required for the clay borrow source. Materials cleared from the sand and clay borrow sources shall
be appropriately disposed of and/or stockpiled as directed by the Engineer. The materials from both
borrows will be mixed and processed in a designated preparation area to produce the required clay/sand
blend to be used for construction of the compacted clay liner as indicated in these Specifications.

2.3 Stockpiling
Stockpiles of cleared and stripped, salvageable, and/or other materials shall be located as directed by the
Engineer. Stockpiles shall be graded to prevent the occurrence of ponding or concentrations of surface
runoff and to promote positive drainage of the stockpiles and adjacent areas. Temporary erosion and
sediment control measures (e.g., silt fences) shall be employed as required and/or directed by the
Engineer around all stockpiles and in a manner consistent with surface water management.

2.4 Subgrade Preparation
After clearing, grubbing, stripping, and excavating, the exposed subgrade surface(s) shall provide a
suitably sound foundation for any subsequent fill and shall be inspected and evaluated by the Engineer.
Evaluation methods will depend on the location and the materials that will be placed over the subgrade.
Soft or yielding areas delineated by the evaluation that cannot be stabilized by compacting shall be
removed and replaced as directed by the Engineer. Unsuitable materials shall also be removed and
replaced as directed by the Engineer. The subgrade shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the Engineer
and no subsequent fill shall be placed until stripped and/or any reworked areas have been inspected and
approved by the Engineer.

Shootaring Canyon Technical Specifications 6
The contours of the finished subgrade surface shall be smoothed to conform approximately to the
dimensions shown on the Drawings. While exact contours are not required, positive drainage and
appropriate surface water control measures shall be maintained. All areas of prepared subgrade shall be
protected from unnecessary vehicular traffic. To promote good bonding with the first layer of fill, the
subgrade surface(s) to receive fill may require scarification or disc harrowing and/or moisture
conditioning as directed by the Engineer.

2.5 Construction of Fills and Material Classifications
2.5.1 General Requirements
All required fills shall be constructed within designated work areas to achieve the desired final grades as
shown on the Drawings. All materials used for fill shall be loaded and hauled to the placement site,
dumped, spread, and leveled to the specified layer thickness, moisture conditioned if required, and
compacted to form a dense integral fill in accordance with these Specifications and to the approval of the
Engineer.

Under most conditions, fills shall be constructed in near horizontal layers beginning in the deepest
portions of the fill(s). Each layer in an area of fill shall be completed over the full length and breadth of
that area before placement of subsequent layers. Each area shall be constructed with materials meeting
the specified requirements and shall be free from lenses, pockets, and layers of materials that are
substantially different in gradation from the surrounding material in the same area as determined by the
Engineer. All fill placed shall be free from organic debris, frozen soil, ice, or other unsuitable materials.
All oversized material shall be removed from the fill material either before placement or after spreading,
but prior to compaction. Fill shall not be placed on frozen soil or when air temperatures drop below 32 °F
unless otherwise approved by the Engineer.

Moisture conditioning to increase or decrease the water content of material to within the specified limits
shall be carried out by whatever method deemed suitable provided the method produces the water
contents specified in these Specifications or designated by the Engineer. Moisture shall be distributed
uniformly throughout each layer of material being placed immediately prior to compaction. Measures
shall be adopted as necessary to ensure that moisture loss is minimized after compaction and until the
subsequent layer is placed.

Should the surface of the fill become excessively rutted or uneven as determined by the Engineer
subsequent to compaction, the surface shall be regraded and recompacted before the next layer of fill is
placed. To promote lift bonding, surface materials may require scarification or disc harrowing and/or
moisture conditioning as directed by the Engineer before the subsequent layer is placed.

Compaction of each layer of fill shall proceed in a systematic, orderly, and continuous manner to ensure
that each layer receives adequate compactive effort to meet the compaction requirements specified in
these Technical Specifications or designated by the Engineer. The rolling pattern for compaction of all
zone boundaries or construction joints shall be such that the full number of roller passes required in one of
the adjacent zones, or on one side of the construction joint, extends completely across the boundary or
joint.

Shootaring Canyon Technical Specifications 7
Compaction shall be performed by whatever equipment and method(s), with due consideration of the
nature of the materials being compacted, provided an acceptable end result is achieved as determined by
the Engineer. Sufficient compaction equipment shall be provided and maintained in good working
condition at all times to ensure that optimal compactive effort is produced by the equipment. The
following compaction equipment is anticipated:

• Smooth-drum vibratory rollers for primarily granular fill materials;
• Padded or sheepsfoot compactors for clay liner construction; and,
• Special accessory or hand-operated equipment for compaction in confined or limited access areas,
near or around structures, and/or in trenches.

2.5.2 Random Fill Materials
Random fill materials are intended for general construction of required subgrade(s) and embankment fills
for the TSF impoundment and process ponds. This material will be generated from required excavation
and grading activities primarily within the limits of the TSF, and will generally consist of poorly-graded
silty sand and weathered/unweathered sandstone. All inspection and testing of random fill materials shall
be in accordance with these Specification and/or as directed by the Engineer.

Material Requirements
Random fill materials shall be free of organics, debris, or other deleterious matter, and shall have a
maximum Liquid Limit of 25 and a maximum Plasticity Index of 10. Random fill materials shall have a
3-inch maximum particle size and contain 5 to 25 percent passing the No. 200 sieve.

Placement
The surface upon which general fill is placed shall be prepared as specified in these Specifications. All
random fill used for subgrade and embankment fill shall be placed and spread in loose lifts free from
pockets or areas of segregation. Loose lifts shall not exceed 12 inches in thickness and shall be compacted
to at least 98% of the maximum dry unit weight within ± 2 % of the optimum water content as determined
by ASTM D 698.

Field testing shall be performed to determine the in-place water content and dry unit weight of the
compacted fill. Any compacted fill materials not meeting placement specifications shall be reworked as
necessary (e.g., scarified, moisture conditioned, thoroughly mixed, recompacted) and subsequently
retested. Each compacted layer shall meet specifications prior to placement of any overlying lifts or other
materials.

2.5.3 Compacted Clay Liner Materials
Compacted Clay Liner (CCL) materials shall consist of a blend of on-site clay and sand soils processed
according to these specifications. All inspection and testing of CCL Materials shall be in accordance with
these Specifications and/or as directed by the Engineer.

Shootaring Canyon Technical Specifications 8
Material Requirements
Materials used for construction of the CCL shall consist of a blended mixture of clay and sand
conforming to the following specifications:

• Proportions (by dry weight): 55% ± 5% clay and 45% ± 5% sand;
• Maximum particle size: 1 inch;
• Minimum percent passing No. 200 sieve: 30%;
• Minimum plasticity index: 10; and,
• Maximum field hydraulic conductivity: 1 x 10-7 cm/s.

The constituent clay and sand for the CCL Materials shall be obtained from the respective borrow areas
shown on the Drawings. Materials from other locations or sources shall not be used unless approved by
the Engineer and provided the applicable material requirements stated in these specifications are met.

Appropriate testing as indicated in these Specifications or directed by the Engineer shall be performed to
assure the blended CCL materials meet the above indicated material requirements. Such testing shall be
performed on the constituent soils prior to blending, as well as on the blended CCL materials during
mixing/processing and prior to placement. Materials with properties that are not consistent with those
determined during borrow characterization testing shall be evaluated by the Engineer. Additional testing
of constituent soils and/or CCL materials may be required to determine if the materials are acceptable or
should be rejected as directed by the Engineer. The material property requirements for the constituent clay
and sand soils are shown in Table 2.1.

Table 2.1. Material Property Requirements for Constituent Clay and Sand
Material Material Property
Clay Sand
1" 100 100
No. 4 95-100 90-100
No. 40 90-100 80-100 AS
T
M

Si
e
v
e

S
i
z
e

No. 200 75-100 10-30
Liquid Limit (%) 55-75 ≤ 25
Plasticity Index (%) 35-50 ≤ 6

Material Processing
Blending and processing of the CCL Materials shall be performed on a mixing pad within a designated
processing area. The base of the mixing pad shall be prepared by placing clay and sand from the
respective borrows in vertically alternating loose lifts 6 to 8 inches in thickness that shall then be mixed
thoroughly with a soil mixer/stabilizer, such as a Cat RM-300 or equivalent. The clay/sand blend will be
moisture-conditioned by adding water as required during the mixing process and compacted to the
satisfaction of the Engineer. The mixing pad base shall have a minimum thickness of 8 inches after
compaction and with the surface graded smooth and level as directed by the Engineer. No materials shall
be processed on the mixing pad until the completed mixing pad base has been approved by the Engineer.

Shootaring Canyon Technical Specifications 9
The processing CCL Materials shall following similar procedures to preparation of the mixing pad base.
Each processed lift shall be subject to process control testing as described above and approval by the
Engineer before any subsequent materials are placed and processed. Approved CCL Materials shall be
protected from moisture loss until used for construction of the CCL. A minimum initial quantity of
approved CCL Materials shall be produced prior to construction of the CCL.

Placement
The CCL shall be constructed on sandstone exposed from excavation and/or approved site grading fill.
These surfaces shall be relatively smooth and free of loose or dislodged materials. The Engineer shall
inspect and approve all surfaces that are to receive CCL Materials prior to placement. Surfaces may
require uniform spraying with water and/or shallow (i.e., ≤ 2 inches) scarification by disc harrowing as
directed by the Engineer to promote satisfactory bonding with the first lift of the CCL.

Approved CCL Materials shall be hauled from the mixing pad, placed and spread in uniform loose lifts,
and immediately compacted with padded or sheep-foot type compaction equipment. The in-place dry unit
weight and water content of the compacted materials shall fall within the “Acceptable Zone” of the
compaction diagram, as presented in Appendix A.

The loose lift thickness shall be such that the pads or feet of the compaction equipment fully penetrate the
loose lift. Each completed lift shall be adequately protected at all times from drying and/or other damage
until the subsequent lift is placed.

The final surface of the CCL shall be graded and rolled smooth and free of defects including ruts,
depressions, protrusions, desiccation cracks, sharp or angular particles, debris, and/or other conditions in
preparation for placement of overlying geomembrane. Appropriate measures shall taken to protect the
completed CCL from drying, surface water erosion, construction activities, vehicular traffic, or other
damage until approval by the Engineer and acceptance by the Geosynthetics Installer. Repairs shall be
subject to testing to verify conformance with specifications as directed by the Engineer.

2.5.4 Drainage Gravel
Drainage gravel will be used for construction of the Leachate Collection System (LCS) on the floor of the
TSF impoundment and sacrificial gravel layer on the floors of the Process Ponds as shown on the
Drawings. These materials will also be used for construction of the LCS and Leak Detection System
(LDS) sumps. The materials will be derived from screened alluvial/colluvial soils available on-site or
from nearby borrow sources. All inspection and testing of drainage gravel materials shall be in
accordance with these Specifications and/or as directed by the Engineer.

Material Requirements
Drainage gravel shall consist of sub-angular, durable materials free of organic matter or other
objectionable materials as determined by the Engineer. Drainage gravel shall be free-draining with an
operational permeability (hydraulic conductivity) of 1 x 10-2 cm/s or greater and meet the particle-size
requirements shown in Table 2.2.

Shootaring Canyon Technical Specifications 10
Table 2.2. Particle-size Requirements for Drainage Gravel
ASTM Sieve Size Percent Passing
1" 100
3/4" 25-100
1/2" 15-60
No. 4 0-15
No. 10 0-2

Placement
To the extent possible, drainage gravel shall be placed in a single lift in accordance with the details and to
the lines and grades shown on the Drawings, or as specified by the Engineer. Placement equipment and
methods used shall be such that underlying pipe work and geosynthetics are protected from damage and
that material segregation is minimized.

2.5.5 Filter Sand
A filter sand layer between the drainage gravel and tailings is a component of the LCS of the TSF
impoundment. Filter sand will be derived from screened alluvial/colluvial soils available on-site or from
nearby borrow sources. All inspection and testing of filter sand shall be in accordance with these
Specifications and/or as directed by the Engineer.

Material Requirements
Filter sand shall consist of durable materials free of organic matter or other objectionable materials as
determined by the Engineer. Filter sand shall be free-draining and meet the particle-size requirements
shown in Table 2.3.

Table 2.3. Particle-size Requirements for Filter Sand
ASTM Sieve Size Percent Passing
3/4" 100
3/8" 85-100
No. 4 70-100
No. 10 40-65
No. 20 20-45
No. 40 0-25
No. 60 0-10
No. 200 0-5

Placement
To the extent possible, filter sand shall be placed in a single lift in accordance with the details and to the
lines and grades shown on the Drawings, or as specified by the Engineer. Placement methods used shall
be such that underlying geosynthetic materials are not damaged and that mixing with the underlying
drainage gravel is minimized.

2.5.6 Anchor Trench Backfill
Anchor trench backfill will consist of materials generated from excavation and site grading activities.
Materials excavated from the anchor trenches shall be used as anchor trench backfill provided material

Shootaring Canyon Technical Specifications 11
requirements are meet. All inspection and testing of anchor trench backfill materials shall be in
accordance with these Specifications and/or as directed by the Engineer.

Material Requirements
Anchor trench backfill shall be free of organics, debris, or other deleterious material and shall have a 1-
inch maximum particle size. Anchor trench backfill shall be free of any sharp, angular particles that may
damage geosynthetics.

Placement
Anchor trench backfill shall be placed in loose lifts and compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum dry
unit weight within ± 2 % of the optimum water content as determined by ASTM D 698. Loose lifts shall
not exceed 8 inches in thickness and compaction shall be performed with care to avoid damage to the
geosynthetics. The final backfill surface shall be graded as shown on the Drawings or as directed by the
Engineer.

Field testing shall be performed to determine the in-place water content and dry unit weight of the
compacted anchor trench backfill. Any compacted backfill materials not meeting placement specifications
shall be reworked as necessary (e.g., scarified, moisture conditioned, thoroughly mixed, recompacted) and
subsequently retested. Each compacted layer shall meet specifications prior to placement of any overlying
lifts or other materials.

2.5.7 Riprap
Riprap is required to line surface water diversion ditches, to protect against wave action on the divider
berm, and to armor pipe outfalls for protection against erosion. Inspection and testing of riprap shall be in
accordance with these Specifications and/or as directed by the Engineer.

Material Requirements
Riprap shall consist of sized dense, sound rock resistant to abrasion and weathering, and shall be free
from fractures, seams, soils, and other defects that would affect durability and susceptibility to water and
freeze-thaw action. Riprap shall have a maximum loss of 40 percent after 500 revolutions when tested in
accordance with ASTM C 131. Riprap shall be obtained only from sources approved by the Engineer.

Riprap shall meet the particle-size requirements shown in Table 2.4. The grout mixture for grouted riprap
shall consist of an aggregate blend of 70 percent sand and 30 percent 3/8-inch rock, a minimum of six
sacks of Type I/II Portland cement, and 1.5 pounds of fiber reinforcement per cubic yard of grout. The
grout mixture shall have a slump between 4 to 6 inches and entrained air between 5.5 to 7.5 percent.

Shootaring Canyon Technical Specifications 12
Table 2.4. Ungrouted Riprap Particle-size Requirements
Riprap D50 Particle Size (in)
18 Rock Size
(in) 2.5 5 6 12 Ungrouted Grouted
27 100
24 100
18 100 35-55 35-55
14 0
12 35-55
9 100 5-20
8 100
6 35-55 5-20
5 35-55
4 100
3 5-20
2.5 35-55 5-20
1.25 5-20

Placement
Riprap materials shall be placed to the lines and grades indicated on the Drawings. Granular bedding
material and/or geotextile filter fabric shall be used beneath riprap as indicated on the Drawings. Riprap
shall be dumped and graded in manner such that the larger fragments are uniformly distributed and that
the smaller fragments fill the spaces between the larger fragments to produce uniform layers with
thicknesses as indicated on the Drawings. Placement of riprap shall be performed to avoid disturbance or
damage to any underlying bedding and/or geotextile materials. Grouted riprap shall be placed directly on
the prepared surface without bedding or geotextile fabric. Placement of riprap shall be to the satisfaction
of the Engineer.

Grout for grouted riprap shall be delivered by means of a low-pressure (i.e., less than 10 psi) grout pump.
The grouted depth shall be one-half of the thickness of the riprap layer (i.e., the top half of the layer
remains exposed). Procedures, such as the use of a vibrator or manual rodding, during grout placement
shall ensure that the spaces between fragments are completely filled. Weep holes shall be provided at the
toe of channel slopes to reduce uplift forces on the grouted channel lining. Unless approved by the
Engineer, grouting shall be allowed only when the air temperature is between 40 and 90°F. Adequate
protection shall be provided until the grout has cured.

2.5.8 Road Base
Road base used for road surface wearing course shall be selected and placed as specified by the Owner.
The following should be considered as guidelines.

Material Requirements
Road base shall generally consist of 3/4 to 1.5 inch screened rock. These materials can likely be produced
from crushing and/or screening of alluvial/colluvial soils available on-site or from nearby borrow sources,
or materials generated from required excavation and site grading.

Shootaring Canyon Technical Specifications 13
Placement
Road base materials placed for a wearing course typically have a compacted thickness of 4 to 6 inches.
The materials for the wearing course should be placed in a single loose lift and compacted with several
passes of rubber-tire or steel-drum compactor. The surface of the compacted wearing course should be
graded as shown on the Drawings

2.5.9 Contaminated Materials
Contaminated materials shall consist of existing tailings, ore, 11-e (2) by-products, and contaminated
soils as shown on the Drawings. These materials shall not be used for any portion of construction and
shall be relocated for permanent disposal to the South Cell after completion of the liner system.
Contaminated materials shall be placed in 12-inch loose and rolled with several passes of a sheeps-foot
type compactor, or as directed by the Engineer.

2.5.10 Unclassified Materials
Unclassified materials shall consist of any materials that are inconsistent with the material types described
above. Unclassified materials shall not be used for any portion of construction and shall be disposed of
and/or stockpiled as directed by the Owner and/or Engineer.

Shootaring Canyon Technical Specifications 14
3.0 GEOSYNTHETICS
This section provides guidelines, descriptions, and technical requirements for geosynthetics associated
with the TSF and process ponds. These include manufacturing requirements; preparation of surfaces;
deployment equipment and methods, seaming, inspection and testing, anchoring, and protection. All
geosynthetic materials and installation shall meet the requirements in these Specifications, and shall be
inspected, sampled, and tested by the Engineer or designated representative in accordance with this
section and the CQA Plan.

3.1 Geosynthetics Labeling, Transportation, Handling, and Storage
Geosynthetics delivered to the project site in rolls shall be individually labeled clearly identifying the
following:

• Name of the manufacturer;
• Product identification;
• Thickness;
• Lot number and date of manufacture;
• Roll number; and ,
• Roll dimensions (i.e., width and length).

All shipments of geosynthetics shall be verified by matching roll identification numbers to the Bill of
Lading. Delivery of geosynthetics to the project site shall be coordinated with the construction schedule,
and allow sufficient time for conformance testing if not performed at the time of manufacturing and/or
prior to shipment. All equipment and methods used for transportation, handling, and storage shall be such
that damage to the geosynthetics does not occur and should comply with ASTM D 4873. Geosynthetics
stored on-site shall be protected from damaging or deleterious conditions including excessive heat or
cold, ponded water, dirt, puncture, cutting, abrasion, and crushing. Geosynthetics that are damaged during
transportation, unloading, storage, or other handling shall be replaced.

3.2 Geomembrane
The composite liner system contains two (i.e., primary and secondary) high-density polyethylene (HDPE)
geomembranes to be placed on the floors and side slopes of the TSF and process ponds. The secondary
HDPE liner will be placed directly on the CCL and will be separated from the primary HDPE liner by a
geonet drainage layer (i.e., the leak detection system). Installation of the geomembrane shall be performed
by the Geomembrane Manufacturer or an Installer trained and certified by the Manufacturer. Inspection
and testing of geomembrane shall be in accordance with these Specifications and/or as directed by the
Engineer.

Shootaring Canyon Technical Specifications 15
3.2.1 Geomembrane Material Requirements
The HDPE geomembrane shall have a 60-mil (0.06 inches) nominal thickness and be textured on both
sides and shall conform to the material property requirements shown in Table 3.1.

Table 3.1. Geomembrane Material Property Requirements
Geomembrane Property Test Value Test Method
Thickness:
Average minimum
Lowest individual for 8 out of 10 values
Lowest individual for any of the 10 values

57 mils
54 mils
51 mils
D 5994
Asperity Height (minimum. average) (1) 10 mils GM 12
Density (minimum average) 0.940 g/cm3 D 1505/ D 792
Tensile Properties (minimum average)(3)
Yield strength
Break strength
Yield Elongation
Break Elongation

126 lb/in.
90 lb/in.
12 %
100 %
D 6693
Type IV
Puncture Resistance (minimum average) 90 lb D 4833
Stress Crack Resistance(4) 300 hr D 5397 (Appendix)
Carbon Black Content (range) 2.0-3.0 % D 1603(5)
Carbon Black Dispersion Note(6) D 5596
Oxidative Induction Time (OIT) (minimum average)(7)
(a) Standard OIT
- or -
(b) High Pressure OIT

100 min.

400 min.

D 3895

D 5885
Over Aging at 85°C(7), (8)
(a) Standard OIT (minimum average) - % retained after 90 days
- or -
(b) High pressure OIT (minimum average) - % retained after 90 days

55 %

80 %
D 5721
D 3895

D 5885
UV Resistance (9)
(a) Standard OIT(minimum average)
- or -
(b) High Pressure OIT (minimum average) - % retained after 1600 hours(11)

N.R.(10)

50 %
GM11
D 3895

D 5885
(1) Of 10 readings; 8 out of 10 must be ≥ 7 mils, and lowest individual reading must be ≥ 5 mils; also see Note 6.
(2) Alternate the measurement side for double sided textured sheet.
(3) Machine direction (MD) and cross machine direction (XMD) average values should be on the basis of 5 test
specimens in each direction.
Yield elongation is calculated using a gage length of 1.3 inches
Break elongation is calculated using a gage length of 2.0 inches
(4) P-NCTL test is not appropriate for testing geomembranes with textured or irregular rough surfaces. Test should
be conducted on smooth edges of textured rolls or on smooth sheets made from the same formulation as being
used for the textured sheet materials.
(5) Other methods such as D 4218 (muffle furnace) or microwave methods are acceptable if an appropriate
correlation to D 1603 (tube furnace) can be established.
(6) Carbon black dispersion (only near spherical agglomerates) for 10 different views:
9 in Categories 1or 2 and 1 in Category 3
(7) The manufacturer has the option to select either one of the OIT methods listed to evaluate the antioxidant content
in the geomembrane.
(8) It is also recommended to evaluate samples at 30 and 60 days to compare with the 90 day response.
(9) The condition of the test should be 20 hr. UV cycle at 75°C followed by 4 hr. condensation at 60°C.
(10) Not recommended since the high temperature of the Std-OIT test produces an unrealistic result for some of the
antioxidants in the UV exposed samples.
(11) UV resistance is based on percent retained value regardless of the original HP-OIT value.

Shootaring Canyon Technical Specifications 16
3.2.2 Geomembrane Deployment and Installation
General
The Geosynthetics Installer shall become thoroughly familiar with all portions of the work described in
this section prior to implementing any deployment or installation of geomembrane. The Geosynthetics
Installer shall carefully inspect and verify that all applicable related work of other sections is complete
and satisfactory so that installation of geomembrane may commence. The Engineer shall be notified in
writing by the Geosynthetics Installer of any concerns regarding the related work of other sections prior to
implementing any deployment or installation of geomembrane. Failure to notify the Engineer or
commencing with deployment and installation of geomembrane shall be construed as acceptance of the
related work of all other sections by the Geosynthetics Installer. The installation of the geomembrane
shall be coordinated with other concurrent construction activities and installation of other components of
the liner system at a pre-installation meeting.

Surface Preparation
The surfaces over which geomembrane is to be placed shall be inspected by the Engineer and accepted
Geosynthetics Installer. The secondary HDPE geomembrane liner will be placed on the completed CCL
and the primary HDPE geomembrane liner will be placed over the LDS geonet. The Geosynthetics
Installer shall certify in writing that these surfaces are acceptable prior to commencing geomembrane
installation. Once accepted, these surfaces shall be maintained and protected until the geomembrane has
been installed and accepted. Any areas that become disturbed or damaged during geomembrane
installation shall be repaired as directed by the Engineer.

Anchor Trenches
Anchor trenches shall be excavated to the lines and grades shown on the Drawings and sufficiently in
advance of geomembrane deployment to avoid damage to any deployed materials. The inside wall (i.e.,
the wall towards the impoundment) of the completed anchor trench shall be free of sharp angular rock
fragments or protrusions. The edge where the geomembrane enters the anchor trench shall be rounded to
avoid sharp bends or creases. While open, the anchor trench shall be adequately sloped and drained to
prevent ponding of water or softening of the adjacent soils. Anchor trenches shall be backfilled as soon as
practically possible following installation of all the geosynthetic components of the liner system.

Geomembrane Placement
The Geosynthetics Installer shall develop a geomembrane field panel layout indicating the general panel
configurations, orientations, and seaming intended. The proposed panel layout and installation procedures
must be approved by the Engineer. A field panel shall consist of a roll or portion of a roll cut in the field.
A numbering, or letter and numbering, identification system shall be used to uniquely identify each field
panel deployed. Geomembrane field panels shall be deployed in general accordance with the approved
field panel layout, or as modified and approved.

Geomembrane field panels shall be placed one at a time and immediately seamed as stated in these
Specifications. Unless approved by the Engineer, geomembrane shall not be placed when the
geomembrane sheet temperature is less than 32° F or greater than 122° F. The effects of temperature (i.e.,
expansion and contraction) shall be carefully considered in the deployment plan. Geomembrane shall be
placed with sufficient slack to compensate for the lowest expected temperature to avoid generation of
thermally induced tensile stresses in the geomembrane or seams, and to prevent the geomembrane from

Shootaring Canyon Technical Specifications 17
lifting up off of the underlying surface (i.e., "trampolining"). The generation of large waves that can
accumulate and/or fold over due to excessive slack and expansion shall be avoided.

Placement of the geomembrane shall be performed with a minimum of handling and in accordance with
manufacturer recommendations and these Specifications. All equipment and methods shall ensure that no
damage occurs to the geomembrane or underlying soil or geosynthetic component(s). Specifically:

• No vehicular traffic shall be allowed on the geomembrane unless approved by the Engineer. Such
equipment shall be ATVs with smooth, oversized tires with a maximum ground pressure of 6 psi;
• Equipment and methods used for placement of the secondary HDPE geomembrane shall not
excessively rut, deform, or otherwise damage the underlying soil subgrade (i.e., the) CCL;
• Equipment shall not leak fuels, operational oils, or lubricants;
• Any personnel working on the geomembrane shall not smoke, wear damaging footwear, bring
glass/glassware onto the geomembrane, or engage in other activities that could result in damage
to the geomembrane;
• The geomembrane shall be unrolled as close as possible to the final intended position of the field
panel;
• Textured geomembrane shall not be dragged across underlying soil or geosynthetic components.
Any "rub sheets" used to facilitate placement and seaming shall be removed prior to placement of
subsequent field panels;
• The placement method(s) shall avoid scratching or crimping of the geomembrane and minimize
wrinkles, especially differential wrinkles between adjacent panels;
• The placement method(s) shall result in intimate contact between the geomembrane and adjacent
soil or geosynthetic components;
• Temporary ballast or anchoring (e.g., sand bags) placed to prevent wind uplift shall not damage
the geomembrane; and,
• Any damaged (e.g., torn, twisted, crimped) field panel or portion thereof shall be replaced or
repaired as directed by the Engineer. Damaged geomembrane removed shall not be reused.

Geomembrane Field Seaming
Generally, field panels shall be placed with edge seams parallel with the maximum slope direction. Panels
shall be shingled with upslope panels placed over downslope panels. On slopes steeper than 10:1 (H:V)
there shall be a minimum run out of 10 feet at the bottom of the slope and horizontal seams shall be
avoided. A horizontal seam shall be defined as any seam (i.e., edge or end) with an alignment greater then
20 degrees from perpendicular to the slope direction. Where horizontal seams are unavoidable, they
should be placed as close to the bottom of the slope as possible and staggered between adjacent rolls. The
geomembrane field panel layout shall minimize seams in corners and at odd-shaped geometric locations.
No seams shall be located in areas of potential stress concentrations.

Unless approved by the Engineer, geomembrane seaming shall not be attempted when the ambient
temperature is less than 40° F or greater than 122° F. The ambient temperature shall be measured within 4
inches of the geomembrane surface.

Only dual-hot-wedge fusion welding and fillet-type extrusion welding shall be used for seaming of
geomembrane field panels. Only personnel previously qualified/approved shall perform seaming. No
seaming shall be performed unless a master seamer is present. Only tested and approved equipment shall
be used for field seaming. At least one spare operable seaming apparatus for each weld type shall be
maintained on-site by the Geosynthetics Installer. Electric generators for field welding equipment shall

Shootaring Canyon Technical Specifications 18
not be placed on the geomembrane unless properly mounted to protect the geomembrane from damage
due to the weight of the equipment or leakage of fuel.

Extrusion welding equipment shall be equipped with temperature gauges. Prior to beginning an extrusion
weld, all heat-degraded extrudate shall be purged from extrusion welding equipment. Automated self-
propelled fusion welding equipment shall be equipped with temperature, travel rate, and pressure
gauges/devices.

Geomembrane panels shall have a sufficient seam overlap to allow proper welding and nondestructive
and/or destructive CQA testing to be performed. Any seam that cannot be properly welded and/or be
nondestructively and/or destructively tested shall be treated as a failing seam. The seam area shall be free
of any moisture, oil, dust, dirt, or foreign material. Any "fishmouths" or wrinkles at seam overlaps shall
be cut along the ridge and ending with a circular cut-out to achieve a flat overlap. The cut portion shall be
seamed and any potion with insufficient overlap shall be repaired with an oval or round geomembrane
patch that extends a minimum of 6 inches in all directions from the cut.

Geomembrane Trial Seams
Prior to performing production seaming, trial seams shall be made to verify that seaming conditions are
adequate. Trial seams shall be made under similar field conditions as production seaming (i.e., in contact
with the underlying subsurface and similar ambient temperature) and on the same material to be installed
and shall not be cut from previously seamed field panels. Trial seams shall be made at the beginning of
each seaming period, and every four hours thereafter, for each seaming crew and apparatus used each day.
Trial seams shall be made whenever seaming personnel and/or equipment are changed, or when changes
in weather or other seaming conditions occur that could affect seam quality. All trial seams shall be
identified (e.g., numbered, dated, etc) so as to be traceable to the seaming personnel, equipment and
materials used to make the trial seam. All trial seam samples shall be a minimum of 1 foot wide (after
welding) with the seam centered lengthwise. The minimum trial seam length shall be 5 feet and 3 feet for
fusion and extrusion welding equipment, respectively.

The Geosynthetics Installer shall cut four test specimens from each trial seam using a 1-inch wide die
cutter and shall test each specimen in peel (both tracks for dual fusion welds) and shear. The specimens
shall be tested using a calibrated field tensiometer at a strain rate of 2 in/min in accordance with ASTM D
6392. The specimens shall exhibit a Film Tear Bond (FTB) and not failure in the seam. The required
values of peel and shear strength values shall be as indicated in the CQA Plan of these Specifications. The
trial seam shall be considered failing and a second trial seam produced if any of the test specimens fail. If
any test specimens from the second trial seam fail, the seaming equipment and seamer shall not be
accepted for field seaming until the deficiencies corrected and two successful trial seams are achieved.
Any inspection and testing of trial seams shall be in accordance with this section, the CQA Plan, and/or as
directed by the Engineer.

Geomembrane Seam Testing
All production seams shall be 100 percent tested for seam continuity using non-destructive methods.
Samples of production seams shall be obtained from the geomembrane and tested for seam strength and
integrity using destructive methods. Both non-destructive and destructive testing shall be performed as
seaming work progresses and not at the completion of all field seaming. Inspection, sampling, and testing
of production seams shall be in accordance with this section, the CQA Plan, and/or as directed by the
Engineer. Any repairs required as indicated by failing seam tests, observations by the Engineer or CQA

Shootaring Canyon Technical Specifications 19
personnel, and/or at locations of destructive samples shall be made and tested accordingly as indicated in
these Specifications.

Non-destructive field testing to verify seam continuity shall be performed by the Geosynthetics Installer
over the full length of all field seams. Vacuum testing of extrusion welded seams shall be performed in
accordance with ASTM D 5641 at a minimum applied vacuum of 3 psi over a 10-s minimum time period.
The presence of bubbles or the loss of vacuum shall constitute failure. Air-channel testing of dual fusion
welded seams shall be performed in accordance with ASTM D 5820 at a minimum applied pressure of 30
psi. If the pressure does not stabilize or there is a pressure loss greater than 3 psi over a 5-min time period
shall constitute failure. All non-destructive seam inspection testing shall be observed full-time by the
Engineer or CQA personnel. Alternative non-destructive test methods shall be subject to approval by the
Engineer.

Destructive seam testing shall be performed on samples to evaluate and verify seam strength and
integrity. The locations of destructive samples shall be selected and marked by the Engineer or CQA
personnel. The locations of destructive samples shall be determined by random methods and/or suspicion
or observation of any potential cause of inadequate seaming. The Geosynthetics Installer shall obtain
samples at the locations marked and shall not be informed in advance of the locations of destructive seam
samples. The holes in the geomembrane at the locations of destructive samples shall be repaired
immediately by the Geosynthetics Installer and the new seams tested accordingly as indicated in these
Specifications. The minimum average sample frequency for destructive samples shall be one test per 500
feet of welded seam length per seaming apparatus. The minimum peel strength for fusion and extrusion
welds shall be 98 and 78 lb/in, respectively. Both tracks of fusion welds shall be tested for peel strength.
The minimum shear strength for both fusion and extrusion welds shall be 121 lb/in. All destructive seam
testing shall be observed or performed in accordance with these Specifications and/or as directed by the
Engineer.

The Geosynthetics Installer shall take immediate corrective action(s) should a seam or seam section fail a
non-destructive or destructive test. The appropriate corrective action(s) shall be agreed upon between the
Engineer and the Geosynthetics Installer and shall be determined by the nature, severity, and extent of the
failure(s). Further testing to isolate or determine the extent of the defect(s) may be required as directed by
the Engineer and/or CQA personnel. Corrective actions may include reconstruction of an entire seam or
isolating and repairing defects or defective sections. The Engineer or CQA personnel may require
additional tests on seams that were made by the same seaming crew and/or equipment during the same
seaming period. All repairs of faulty or failing seams shall be made and tested accordingly as indicated in
this section and the CQA Plan.

Geomembrane Defects and Repairs
The geomembrane shall be inspected before and after seaming for any evidence of defects including
holes, blisters, punctures, undispersed raw materials, and any contamination or damage by foreign
materials. The surface of the geomembrane shall be clean at the time of inspection and shall be swept or
washed by the Geosynthetics Installer if surface conditions inhibit inspection. Locations of suspected
flaws or defects shall be inspected and/or non-destructively tested as appropriate by the Engineer or CQA
personnel. All locations that fail inspection and/or non-destructive testing shall be marked by the
Engineer or CQA personnel and repaired by the Geosynthetics Installer. After seaming of the
geomembrane is complete, any excessive wrinkles or waves shall be identified by the Engineer or CQA
personnel and subsequently repaired by the Geosynthetics Installer.

Shootaring Canyon Technical Specifications 20
Any portion of the geomembrane (non-seamed and seamed) identified with a flaw or defect, or that fails
non-destructive or destructive testing shall be repaired by the Geosynthetics Installer. The appropriate
repair procedures shall be agreed upon between the Engineer and the Geosynthetics Installer and shall be
determined by the nature, severity, and extent of the flaw, defect, or failure(s). Acceptable repair
procedures include:

• Patching - for holes, tears, punctures, undispersed raw materials, and/or contamination by foreign
matter;
• Abrading and re-seaming - for short sections of faulty extrusion seams;
• Spot seaming - for isolated, minor flaws such as scratches, scraps, and scuffs; and,
• Capping or Strip repairing - for long sections of failing seams.

Any other repair procedures shall be approved by the Engineer for the specific repair to be made. All
repairs shall be made and subject to testing (non-destructive and/or destructive) according to this section,
the CQA Plan, and/or as directed by the Engineer.

Geomembrane Conformance Testing and Final Acceptance
Samples of the geomembrane shall be obtained for conformance testing to ensure compliance with the
requirements in these Specifications. Samples for conformance testing may be obtained at the time of
manufacture of the geomembrane or from rolls delivered to the project site. The time for sampling,
testing, and review of results shall be considered in the construction and installation schedule for the
project. All sampling, testing, and material requirements shall be in accordance with this section and the
CQA Plan. Any geomembrane that does not meet these requirements shall be rejected and replaced.

The Geosynthetics Installer shall remain responsible for maintaining the installed geomembrane until
final acceptance by the Owner. The Engineer will recommend final acceptance when:

• The installation is complete;
• All seams and repairs have been satisfactorily tested and verified for adequacy;
• All field and laboratory testing is complete and satisfactory;
• All Manufacturer and Installer documentation has been submitted; and,
• All applicable Manufacturer and Installer warranties have been submitted.

As part of the final acceptance, the Geosynthetics Installer shall furnish as-built drawings showing the
location of the geomembrane field panels, seams, destructive test samples, and repairs. The drawings
shall be prepared on 24 by 32-inch size sheets to a scale approved by the Engineer, and submitted in final
form within 30 days after completion of construction.

3.3 Geonet
The composite liner system contains a geonet between the primary and secondary HDPE liners and will
serve as the leak detection system. The geonet will be installed on the floors and side slopes of the TSF
and process ponds. Inspection and testing of geonet shall be in accordance with these Specifications
and/or as directed by the Engineer.

Shootaring Canyon Technical Specifications 21
3.3.1 Geonet Material Requirements
The geonet shall conform to the material property requirements shown in Table 3.2.

Table 3.2. Geonet Material Property Requirements
Geonet Property ASTM Test Method Value
1
Density (g/cm3) D 792 or D1505 0.945
Thickness (mils) D 5199 300
Carbon Black (%) D 4218 2.0 – 3.0
Compressive Strength (psf) D 1621 11,000
Transmissivity2 (m2/s) D 4716 3 x 10-3
1 All values are MARV except compressive strength and transmissivity which are minimum values.
2 Measured using water at 68 °F with a gradient of 0.04 under a confining stress of 11,000 psf. The
specimen shall be placed in the testing device between 60-mil, textured HDPE. Measurements shall
be taken one hour after application of the confining stress.

3.3.2 Geonet Placement and Installation
Geonet shall be placed as shown on the Drawings or as directed by the Engineer. Geonet shall not be
placed until conformance testing and inspection of the underlying HDPE geomembrane has been
completed and approved by Engineer. Handling and placement of the geonet shall be performed such that
damage to the geonet and adjacent HDPE geomembrane is avoided. Care shall be taken to avoid
entrapping stones, excessive dust, and/or other foreign matter in the geonet. After placement, the geonet
shall be appropriately anchored or weighted to prevent movement or shifting of the geonet. The entire
geonet surface shall be inspected for any foreign objects that may damage the geonet or adjacent HDPE
geomembranes. All geonet placement, anchoring, overlaps, and seams shall be to the satisfaction of the
Engineer.

The geonet shall be placed such that the primary flow direction (i.e., machine or roll direction) is aligned
along the maximum slope direction. On slopes steeper than 10:1 (H:V) there shall be a minimum run out
of 10 feet at the bottom of the slope and horizontal seams (i.e., edge and end) shall be avoided. A
horizontal seam shall be defined as any seam with an alignment greater then 20 degrees from
perpendicular to the slope direction. Where horizontal seams are unavoidable, they should be placed as
close to the bottom of the slope as possible and staggered between adjacent rolls.

Adjacent geonet roll edges shall be overlapped a minimum of 4 inches and roll ends shall be overlapped a
minimum of 8 inches. All overlaps shall be joined by tying with plastic fasteners or polymeric braid.
Metallic ties or fasteners shall not be used. The tying devices shall be white or yellow for easy visual
inspection. Tying intervals shall be every 5 feet along edge overlaps, and every 6 inches along end
overlaps and within anchor trenches.

3.4 Geotextile
Geotextile cushioning shall be placed to provide puncture protection of the primary and secondary HDPE
geomembranes from gravel layers that are part of adjacent components of the liner system of the TSF and
Process Ponds. The required protection consists of 10-oz/square yard fabric for the Process Ponds and 20-
oz/square yard fabric, or equivalent (i.e., two 10-oz fabrics), for the TSF. Inspection and testing of
geotextile shall be in accordance with these Specifications and/or as directed by the Engineer.

Shootaring Canyon Technical Specifications 22
3.4.1 Geotextile Material Requirements
The geotextile shall conform to the material property requirements shown in Table 3.3.

Table 3.3. Geotextile Material Property Requirements
Geotextile Property ASTM Test Method Value1
Mass per Unit Area (oz/yd2) D 5261 10
Thickness (mils) D 5199 105
Grab Tensile Strength (lb) D 4632 260
Grab Tensile Elongation (%) D 4632 50
Pin Puncture Strength (lb) D 4833 180
Trapezoidal Tear Strength (lb) D 4533 100
UV Resistance2 (%) D 4355 70
1 All values are MARV except UV resistance which is a minimum value.
2 Evaluated after 500 hours of exposure on a 2-inch strip tensile specimen.

3.4.2 Geotextile Placement and Installation
The geotextile shall be placed as shown on the Drawings or as directed by the Engineer. Geotextile shall
not be placed until conformance testing and inspection of the underlying HDPE geomembrane has been
completed and approved by Engineer. All handling and placement of the geotextile shall be performed
such that damage to the geotextile and adjacent HDPE geomembrane is avoided. Care shall be taken to
avoid entrapping stones, excessive dust, and/or other foreign matter in the geotextile. Any "rub sheets"
used to aid the placement of the geotextile on the textured geomembrane shall be removed after correct
positioning of the geotextile. After placement, the geotextile shall be appropriately anchored or weighted
to prevent wind uplift and/or shifting of the geotextile. The entire geotextile surface shall be inspected for
any foreign objects that may damage the geotextile or adjacent HDPE geomembrane. All geotextile
placement, anchoring/weighting, overlaps, and seams shall be to the satisfaction of the Engineer.

Adjacent geotextile roll edges and ends shall be overlapped a minimum of 12 inches and properly
weighted to prevent separation. Alternatively, an SSa-1 seam using a Random Fill01 stitch with four to
seven stitches per inch may be used to prevent separation of adjacent geotextile edges. The minimum
seam allowance (minimum distance from the geotextile edge to the stitch line nearest that edge) shall be 2
inches. Where a double layer of geotextile is placed (i.e., floor of the TSF), roll edges and ends shall be
staggered so that overlaps or sewn seams do not lie above one another.

3.5 HDPE Pipe
Perforated and solid HDPE pipe shall be used for LCS and LDS collection piping and sump access pipes.
Leachate collection and leak detection pipe shall have an SDR of 15.5 with diameters ranging from 3 to 8
inches. Sump access pipe shall have an SDR of 9 with a diameter of 12 inches. Inspection and testing of
HDPE pipe shall be in accordance with this section, the CQA Plan, and/or as directed by the Engineer.

3.5.1 HDPE Pipe Material Requirements
HDPE pipe and fittings shall be manufactured from high density, high molecular weight, and PE3408
polyethylene resin. The resin shall meet or exceed ASTM D 3350 cell classification 345464C, and be
listed by the Plastic Pipe Institute in PPI TR-4 with HDB ratings of 1600 psi at 73° F and 800 psi at 140°
F. Clean rework material from the manufacturer’s own production may be used provided the pipe or
fittings meet all requirements of this specification. Recycled and reclaimed material from outside the
manufacturer’s plant shall not be used. Dimensions and workmanship for HDPE pipe shall be as specified

Shootaring Canyon Technical Specifications 23
by ASTM F 714, D 2513, D 3035, and on the Drawings. Perforations or slots shall be as specified on the
Drawings.

3.5.2 HDPE Pipe Installation
Pipework shall be installed to the lines and grades and generally in the manner shown on the Drawings.
Lines and grades not indicated on the Drawings shall be specified by the Engineer to suit the existing
ground conditions. Where interference is encountered during installation or relocation of pipework is
deemed necessary, the Engineer shall approve any revisions before such changes are made. All equipment
and methods for handling and placement of pipe and fittings shall be as described in these Specifications
and in accordance with manufacture recommendations.

Prior to installation, each segment of pipe and all fittings shall be inspected for defects and/or damage.
Care shall be exercised to prevent foreign matter from entering the pipe while it is being installed. Open
ends of the pipe shall be covered by temporary end caps or other approved means when installation is not
in progress to prevent foreign matter from entering the pipe. Care shall be taken during the installation of
pipeline runs where drainage is required to ensure that the pipeline has a continuous slope to the point of
drainage. Construction equipment shall not cross over installed pipework unless the appropriate type and
thickness of cover material is in place.

Pipe bends to form curves either in the horizontal or vertical plane shall not exceed that recommended by
the Manufacturer or approved by the Engineer. The cutting of pipe for inserting fittings or closure pieces
shall be performed without damage to the pipe and such that a smooth end at right angles to the axis of
the pipe is produced.

HDPE pipe lengths shall be joined by thermal butt fusion in accordance with manufacturer
recommendations, unless flanged end pipes are specified on the Drawings. The butt fusion equipment
used in the joining procedures shall be capable of meeting all conditions recommended by the pipe
Manufacturer. Stub ends and pipe fittings for butt fusion shall be of at least the same wall thickness and
pressure rating and the same resin type, grade, and cell classification and Manufacturer as the pipe to be
joined, unless otherwise recommended by the Manufacturer. Thermal fusion of HDPE pipe shall be
performed only by qualified technicians.

Shootaring Canyon Technical Specifications 24
4.0 CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN
4.1 General
All materials, products, installation, and workmanship shall be appropriately inspected and/or tested as
indicated in these Specifications and in this Construction Quality Assurance (CQA) Plan. The intent of
the CQA Plan is to provide means for control, documentation, verification, and assurance of compliance
with the Drawings, Specifications, and any applicable permits for construction of this facility. The
appropriate CQA testing shall be performed by the Engineer. All testing shall be performed in accordance
with procedures outlined in these Specifications.

To the extent possible, testing shall be performed so as not to interfere with construction operations.
However, if required for any reason, work shall be stopped in the area being tested until the appropriate
testing can be completed and results approved by the Engineer.

4.2 Earthwork CQA
The Engineer shall perform CQA observation, inspection, and/or testing of all earthwork construction,
materials, and methods for compliance with these Specifications. Any certifications, details, or other
information pertaining to equipment, methods, materials, and/or personnel shall be provided as directed
by the Engineer.

4.2.1 Clearing, Grubbing, and Stripping
The Engineer shall inspect all areas after clearing, grubbing, and stripping have been completed for
compliance with the Drawings and these Specifications. Inspection shall involve verification and
documentation that all topsoil, vegetative, organic, or other undesirable materials have been adequately
removed to the limits shown on the Drawings or as otherwise directed. No subsequent work in stripped
areas shall be performed until approved by the Engineer.

4.2.2 Excavation, Grading, and Subgrade Preparation
The Engineer shall inspect excavations, grading, and prepared subgrade for compliance with the
Drawings and these Specifications. Inspection shall involve verification and documentation that all
excavations and grading is to the limits shown on the Drawings or as otherwise directed. Anchor trench
excavations shall be inspected by the Engineer for compliance with these Specifications. The Engineer
may require surveying before and/or after excavation and final grading to verify the requirements in these
Specifications. Prior to excavation, the Engineer shall inspect all areas to identify salvageable materials.
The Engineer shall verify that all loose, weathered or disturbed/dislodged materials have been removed
down to hard competent sandstone. The final surfaces after excavation shall be graded, prepared, and
inspected as indicated in these Specifications.

The Engineer shall inspect cut areas to verify and document grading is to the lines and grades as indicated
on the Drawings or as otherwise directed. Any unacceptable areas or materials shall be repaired or
replaced as directed by the Engineer. The Engineer shall determine if any additional moisture
conditioning or surface preparation is required to promote adequate bonding with the first lift of fill.
Placement of fill materials shall not commence until prepared areas have been approved by the Engineer.

Shootaring Canyon Technical Specifications 25
4.2.3 Fill Materials and Construction
The Engineer shall test all fill materials and placement for compliance with the Drawings and
Specifications according to the frequencies in Table 4.1. Inspection and testing methods shall follow
current applicable ASTM or industry standards, or as indicated in these Specifications.

Table 4.1. Tests Frequencies for Fill Materials and Construction
Random Fill
Test Frequency Applicable Test Methods/Standards
Laboratory Compaction ASTM D 698
Atterberg Limits ASTM D 4318
Particle-Size Distribution
5,000 yd3 or observed
material change(s) ASTM D 422, D 1140, D 6913
In-Place Unit Weight & Water
Content 1,000 yd3 placed per lift ASTM D 2216, D 4643, D 5220,
D 1556, D 2167, D 5195
Compacted Clay Liner Fill
Test Frequency Applicable Test Methods/Standards
Laboratory Compaction ASTM D 698
Atterberg Limits ASTM D 4318
Particle-Size Distribution
5,000 yd3
ASTM D 422, D 1140, D 6913
Laboratory Hydraulic Conductivity 15,000 yd3 ASTM D 5084
In-Place Unit Weight & Water
Content 500 yd3 placed per lift ASTM D 2216, D 4643, D 5220,
D 1556, D 2167, D 5195
In-Place Hydraulic Conductivity 4 acres per 5-9 inches of
compacted thickness SSRI (See Appendix B)
Drainage Gravel
Test Frequency Applicable Test Methods/Standards
Particle-Size Distribution 5,000 yd3 ASTM D 422, D 1140, D 6913
Laboratory Hydraulic Conductivity 20,000 yd3 ASTM D 2434
Filter Sand
Test Frequency Applicable Test Methods/Standards
Particle-Size Distribution 3,000 yd3 ASTM D 422, D 1140, D 6913
Laboratory Hydraulic Conductivity 20,000 yd3 ASTM D 2434
Anchor Trench Backfill
Test Frequency Applicable Test Methods/Standards
Laboratory Compaction ASTM D 698
Atterberg Limits ASTM D 4318
Particle-Size Distribution
3,000 yd3 or observed
material change(s) ASTM D 422, D 1140, D 6913
In-Place Unit Weight & Water
Content 500 linear feet per lift ASTM D 2216, D 4643, D 5220,
D 1556, D 2167, D 5195
Riprap
Test Frequency Applicable Test Methods/Standards
L. A. Abrasion Per source and 15,000 ft2 ASTM C 131
Particle-Size Distribution Per source and 15,000 ft2 ASTM D 422, D 1140, D 6913, or Visual
Layer Thickness 100 linear ft or 5,000 ft2 ---

Shootaring Canyon Technical Specifications 26
4.3 Geosynthetics CQA
The Engineer shall perform CQA observation, inspection, and/or testing of all geosynthetics materials and
installation for compliance with these Specifications including; manufacturing requirements; preparation
of surfaces; deployment equipment and methods, seaming, anchoring, and protection.

4.3.1 Geosynthetics Manufacturing Quality Control and Conformance Testing
The Engineer shall verify and document that all geosynthetic materials delivered to the project site are in
conformance with the requirements of these Specifications prior to deployment or installation. The
Engineer shall verify that the Geosynthetics Manufacturer has established Manufacturing Quality Control
(MQC) procedures. The Geosynthetics Manufacturer shall provide product certification (i.e., MQC
certificates) for all rolls of geosynthetics prior to shipping. The Engineer shall verify:

• The MQC certificates include test results for all material properties applicable to the product;
• The material properties indicated and testing frequency conform with these Specifications; and,
• The MQC certificates indicate the roll identification numbers for which the test results apply.

The Engineer shall obtain and perform testing on conformance samples of all geosynthetics at the
frequencies indicated in these Specifications. The date, roll identification number, and machine direction
shall be marked on all conformance samples. The conformance samples may be obtained at the
manufacturing facility prior to shipment or at the project site after delivery. However, no geosynthetics
shall be deployed until results of conformance testing have been reviewed by the Engineer. The time
required for conformance sampling, testing, and review of results should be considered in the construction
schedule. The minimum geosynthetics MQC and CQA conformance testing shall be in accordance with
Table 4.2 through 4.4.

Should a sample fail conformance testing, the roll from which the conformance sample was obtained shall
be rejected and replaced with a roll in conformance with these Specifications. Additional conformance
samples shall be obtained from the rolls numerically previous and subsequent to the failing roll. Should
either (or both) of these samples fail, the next numerically sequential roll (or rolls) to the failing roll shall
be sampled and tested for conformance. Should any of these samples fail, every roll within the same lot as
the originally failing roll shall be sampled and tested for conformance.

Shootaring Canyon Technical Specifications 27
Table 4.2. Geomembrane MQC and CQA Testing Frequencies
Testing Frequency (minimum) Measured Properties MQC CQA Test Method
Thickness Per roll 250,000 ft2 ASTM D 5994
Asperity Height Ever 2nd roll 250,000 ft2 GRI GM 12
Density 60,000 ft2 250,000 ft2 ASTM D 1505/ D 792
Tensile Properties 60,000 ft2 250,000 ft2 ASTM D 6693
Type IV
Puncture Resistance 150,000 ft2 500,000 ft2 ASTM D 4833
Stress Crack Resistance 500,000 ft2 ASTM D 5397 (Appendix)
Carbon Black Content 60,000 ft2 250,000 ft2 ASTM D 1603
Carbon Black Dispersion 150,000 ft2 500,000 ft2 ASTM D 5596
Oxidative Induction Time (OIT)
(a) Standard OIT
- or -
(b) High Pressure OIT
500,000 ft2 2 per project

ASTM D 3895

ASTM D 5885
Over Aging at 85°C
(a) Standard OIT
- or -
(b) High Pressure OIT
1 per project 1 per project
ASTM D 5721
ASTM D 3895

ASTM D 5885
UV Resistance
(a) Standard OIT (not recommended)
- or -
(b) High Pressure OIT
1 per project 1 per project
GRI GM11
ASTM D 3895

ASTM D 5885
Interface Shear Strength(1) N/A 1 per project ASTM D 5321
(1) Performed at 10, 20, and 40 psi normal stresses between the geomembrane and geonet

Table 4.3. Geonet MQC and CQA Testing Frequencies
Testing Frequency (minimum) Measured Properties MQC CQA Test Method
Density (g/cm3) 90,000 ft2 300,000 ft2 D 792 or D1505
Thickness (mils) 90,000 ft2 300,000 ft2 D 5199
Carbon Black (%) 90,000 ft2 300,000 ft2 D 4218
Compressive Strength (psf) 1 per project 1 per project D 1621
Transmissivity2 (m2/s) 1 per project 1 per project D 4716

Table 4.4. Geotextile MQC and CQA Testing Frequencies
Testing Frequency (minimum) Measured Properties MQC CQA Test Method
Mass per Unit Area 90,000 ft2 300,000 ft2 D 5261
Grab Tensile Strength 90,000 ft2 300,000 ft2 D 4632
Grab Tensile Elongation 90,000 ft2 300,000 ft2 D 4632
Pin Puncture Strength 90,000 ft2 300,000 ft2 D 4833
Trapezoidal Tear Strength 90,000 ft2 300,000 ft2 D 4533
UV Resistance 1 per project 1 per project D 4355

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A
COMPACTION DIAGRAM FOR COMPACTED CLAY LINER

90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
5 1015202530
50/50 Blends
60/40 Blends
Dr
y

U
n
i
t

W
e
i
g
h
t

(
p
c
f
)
Water Content (%)
Line of Optimums
Solid symbols indicate permeability specimens
Modified effort curves
Standard effort curves
Reduced effort curves
Acceptable Zone
Gs = 2.7
Zero Air Voids Curve:

APPENDIX B
PROCEDURES FOR
SEALED SINGLE-RING INFILTROMETER (SSRI) TESTING

The Sealed Single-Ring Infiltrometer (SSRI) testing methodology proposed herein is based on the
procedure developed by Applied Geotechnical Engineering Consultants (AGEC) for the aforementioned
Envirocare facility (see Envirocare 1997). The SSRI device consists of a sealed metal ring that is pushed
into the soil layer of interest as shown in Figure 1 below. A manometer tube extends above the ring to a
reservoir that supplies the water for the test. The height of water in the manometer tube provides the
driving force for water flow into the soil during the test. The ring is beveled along the bottom edge (i.e.,
to provide a cutting edge) and is welded to a flange that allows the connection of a lid. A rubber gasket
is placed between the flange and the lid to create the seal. The lid is equipped with two nipples to connect
the water supply standpipe and an air escape valve that is opened while filling the system with water.

Figure 1. Schematic of SSRI Test Setup (redrawn after Envirocare 1997)
The field hydraulic conductivity (kf) is then determined in a manner similar to a falling head test in which
the water level in the manometer tube (H) is monitored over time. The governing equation developed by
AGEC for estimating kf is as follows:
()2
r
t
a
f R
R
L5.0H
dTdHL2k ⎟⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜⎜
⎝
⎛⋅+
⋅⋅= (1)
where L is the depth of the wetting front at the end of the test, Ha is the average water height above the
soil surface during the test, dH/dT is the change in water height over time (i.e., the slope of a plot of H
versus T), Rt is the radius of the manometer tube, and Rr is the radius of the sealed ring. As noted by the
DRC previously (DRC 1998), Eq. 1 provides estimates of kf that are conservative relative to ASTM
D5126-90 provided that H is less than 1.8 m (6 ft) during the test.
In this testing program, the metal ring will be approximately 254 mm (10 in) in diameter and 203 mm (8
in) long. The exact dimensions of the ring will be measured precisely prior to testing. All areas to be
tested will be prepared by smoothing the soil surface and removing any loose soil as necessary. The metal
ring will be placed on each prepared area and inserted to a depth at least 101 mm (4 in) but no greater
than 152 mm (6 in) in a direction normal to the soil surface, and the soil immediately adjacent to the
inside edge of the ring will be compacted to minimize sidewall leakage. The ring will then be filled with
H
L
Wetting  Front
Flange
Air Escape
Valve
Supply
Valve
Reservoir
Water  Level
Manometer Tube

water (to within 15 mm from the bottom of the top flange) and sealed with the gasket and lid. The
manometer tube and reservoir then will be connected to the lid and supported on a stand at an elevation
such that the initial height of water will be approximately 1.5 m (5 ft) above the top of the ring. After
water is added to the reservoir, the vent valve will be opened to allow water to completely fill the tubing
and headspace within the ring. The vent valve will be closed when the reservoir is empty and the water
level in the manometer tube reaches the prescribed initial level for the start of the test.
The water level in the manometer tube will be measured and recorded every 20 seconds for 8 minutes,
and the water drop will be plotted as a function of time (i.e., H vs. T). After 8 minutes of testing, the
system will be dismantled, the water inside the ring will be evacuated, and the depth of the wetting front
(L) will be measured using a static weight penetrometer in accordance with the DRC-approved method
employed at the Envirocare facility (see DRC 1997). The penetrometer will consist of a stainless steel
rod with a 0.25-in nominal diameter and a flat tip. The penetrometer weight will be sufficient to provide
a minimum tip pressure of 100 psi, and the QC technician will ensure that the probe remains nearly
vertical when pressed into the soil. When the penetration stops, the QC technician will remove the
penetrometer and measure the wetting front depth. This procedure will be performed three times (near
the center of the ring) for each SSRI test, and the average wetting front depth will be used as the L value
in Eq. 1.
Once L has been determined, kf will be estimated using Eq. 1, where dH/dT is the slope of the H vs. T
plot after the equipment has stabilized (i.e., the slope tends to approach a reasonably constant value after
the first few readings; see Envirocare 1997).
REFERENCES
DRC (1997). “Revised Wetting Front Depth Test Method: Radioactive Material License No. UT
2300249.” Letter from DRC to Envirocare dated September 26, 1997.
DRC (1998). “Envirocare Sealed Single Ring (SSRI) Infiltrometer; DRC Staff Conclusions on Theory,
Applicability, and Safety Factor for Calculating Permeability; Recommendations on Minimum
Representative Elementary Volume; Test Pad Implications and Negotiated Improvements.” DRC
Interoffice Memorandum from D. Finerfrock to L. Morton dated February 25, 1998.
Envirocare of Utah, Inc. (1997). “Radioactive Material License # UT 2300249 Renewal Application;
Sealed Single-Ring Infiltrometer Assessment.” Letter from Envirocare to UTAH DRC dated July
31, 1997, with attached letter report from AGEC documenting the SSRI test procedure.

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

Shootaring Rec Plan.docx ii Engineering Analytics, Inc.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1
Terms of Reference ................................................................................................. 1
Updated Conditions ................................................................................................ 1
CURRENT SITE CONDITIONS .................................................................................... 2
Location and Land Use ........................................................................................... 2
Geology ................................................................................................................... 2
Results of 2023 Field Investigation ........................................................................ 3
Results of Laboratory Testing for the Facility ........................................................ 4
Historical Laboratory Testing .............................................................................. 4
Laboratory Testing Completed in 2023 ............................................................... 4
Seismicity ................................................................................................................ 5
Climate and Vegetation........................................................................................... 5
Geohydrology ......................................................................................................... 5
Existing Milling Facility Conditions ...................................................................... 6
TSF RECLAMATION CRITERIA ................................................................................ 7
TSF RECLAMATION PLAN ......................................................................................... 8
General .................................................................................................................... 8
Description of Cover ............................................................................................... 9
Frost Penetration Analysis ...................................................................................... 9
Radon Attenuation ................................................................................................ 10
Biointrusion........................................................................................................... 10
Infiltration Analysis .............................................................................................. 10
General ............................................................................................................... 10
Method of Analysis ............................................................................................ 11
Parameters Used for Analysis ............................................................................ 11
Results of Analysis ............................................................................................ 13
Allowable Leakage Rate ....................................................................................... 13
Settlement Analysis .............................................................................................. 14
General ............................................................................................................... 14
Method of Analysis ............................................................................................ 14
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

Shootaring Rec Plan.docx iii Engineering Analytics, Inc.

Material Properties ............................................................................................. 14
Consolidation Settlement due to Tailings Regrading and Interim Cover Placement
............................................................................................................................ 14
Consolidation Settlement due to Final Cover Placement .................................. 15
Long-term (Creep) Settlement ........................................................................... 15
Total Settlement ................................................................................................. 16
Cracking Potential of Radon Barrier..................................................................... 16
General ............................................................................................................... 16
Horizontal Movement Profile ............................................................................ 17
Horizontal Strain ................................................................................................ 17
Tensile Strain to Cause Cracking ....................................................................... 17
Slope Stability Analysis ........................................................................................ 18
General ............................................................................................................... 18
Method of Analysis ............................................................................................ 18
Material Properties ............................................................................................. 18
Results of Analysis ............................................................................................ 18
Surface Water Hydrology and Erosion Protection................................................ 19
Offsite Runoff Diversion ................................................................................... 19
Rock Mulch Cover ............................................................................................. 19
Grading ................................................................................................................. 19
Borrow Source Location and Characterization ..................................................... 20
Borrow Source Locations .................................................................................. 20
Borrow Source Characterization ........................................................................ 20
Borrow Source Quantities ..................................................................................... 22
Revegetation of Disturbed Areas .......................................................................... 22
Seedbed Preparation........................................................................................... 22
Seeding ............................................................................................................... 23
MILL DECOMMISSIONING AND SITE CLEANUP............................................... 24
Decommissioning Objectives ............................................................................... 24
Decommissioning Strategy ................................................................................... 24
Water Management Pond and Water Well #1 ................................................... 26
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

Shootaring Rec Plan.docx iv Engineering Analytics, Inc.

Ticaboo Debris Stockpile ................................................................................... 26
Regulatory Requirements...................................................................................... 26
Health and Safety Procedures ............................................................................... 26
Pre-Demolition Activities ..................................................................................... 27
Disassemble and Dispose of Contaminated Equipment and Structural Materials 28
Decontamination of Tools, Equipment and Buildings for Unconditional Use ..... 28
Demolition of Above-Ground Facilities ............................................................... 28
Demolition of Below-Ground Facilities ............................................................... 29
Soils Cleanup ........................................................................................................ 29
Material Placement ............................................................................................... 29
WATER RESOURCE PROTECTION ........................................................................ 31
ADDITIONAL PLANS AND MONITORING PROGRAMS .................................... 32
Additional Plans .................................................................................................... 32
Settlement Monitoring Plan ............................................................................... 32
Closure and Post-Closure Monitoring .................................................................. 32
Closure Monitoring ............................................................................................ 32
Post-Closure Monitoring .................................................................................... 33
RECLAMATION AND DECOMMISSIONING SCHEDULE .................................. 34
RECLAMATION AND DECOMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATE ....................... 35
REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 36

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

Shootaring Rec Plan.docx v Engineering Analytics, Inc.

LIST OF TABLES
Table 4-1 Summary of Material Properties for Infiltration Analyses
Table 4-2 Sources of Meteorological Data
Table 4-3 Comparison of Average Historic and Synthetic Climate Data
Table 4-4 Summary of 1,000 Years of Synthetic Climate Data
Table 4-5 Summary of Results of Water Balance Components
Table 4-6 Summary of Material Properties for Settlement Analyses
Table 4-7 Summary of Maximum Tensile Strain for Cross Sections H1 and H2
Table 4-8 Material Properties for Slope Stability Analyses
Table 4-9 Summary of Minimum Factors of Safety
Table 4-10 Reclamation Cut and Fill Quantities
Table 4-11 Required Borrow Quantities and Sources
Table 4-12 Proposed Seed Mix and Application Rates
Table 5-1 List of Equipment/Buildings Anticipated for Disposal into Tailings Facility
Table 5-2 List of Equipment/Buildings Anticipated for Unrestricted Release
Table 8-1 Summary of Reclamation and Decommissioning Schedule
Table 9-1 Summary of Reclamation and Decommissioning Cost Estimate

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

Shootaring Rec Plan.docx vi Engineering Analytics, Inc.

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2-1 Site Location
Figure 2-2 Location and Features
Figure 2-3 Test Pit Location Map
Figure 2-4 Existing Conditions
Figure 2-5 Plant and Related Facilities
Figure 4-1 Operational Tailings
Figure 4-2 Tailings and Mill Debris Regrade
Figure 4-3 Interim Cover
Figure 4-4 Final Cover and Grading
Figure 4-5 Cross Section A
Figure 4-6 Cross Section B
Figure 4-7 Final Reclamation Cover System
Figure 4-8 Two-Dimensional SEEP/W Model used in the Infiltration Analyses
Figure 4-9 SWCCs for the Materials used in the Analyses
Figure 4-10 Hydraulic Conductivity Functions for the Materials used in the Analyses
Figure 4-11 Slope Stability Analyses – Cross Section A Overview
Figure 4-12 Slope Stability Analyses – Cross Section A Static Circular
Figure 4-13 Slope Stability Analyses – Cross Section A Static Block
Figure 4-14 Slope Stability Analyses – Cross Section A Pseudo-Static Circular
Figure 4-15 Slope Stability Analyses – Cross Section A Pseudo-Static Block
Figure 4-16 Location of Clay Borrow Source (General Site Location)
Figure 4-17 Geologic Map with Borrow Source Areas
Figure 4-18 Preliminary Clay Borrow Source Volume
Figure 6-1 Representative Groundwater Monitoring Network System
Figure 8-1 Reclamation and Decommissioning Schedule

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

Shootaring Rec Plan.docx vii Engineering Analytics, Inc.

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A Test Pit Logs for 2023 Field Investigation
Appendix B Results of Laboratory Testing for Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
B.1 Select Results from Hydro-Engineering (2005b) Laboratory Testing
B.2 Petrographic Analysis (Paster, 2002)
B.3 Results from Advanced Terra Testing (2008) Laboratory Testing
B.4 Select Results from Tetra Tech (2008b) Laboratory Testing
B.5 Results from Engineering Analytics (2023) Laboratory Testing
B.6 Results from DBS&A (2023) Laboratory Testing
Appendix C Seismic Hazard Analysis – Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Appendix D Technical Memorandum – Frost Depth Analysis
Appendix E Technical Memorandum – Radon Cover Design and Analyses
Appendix F Technical Memorandum – Biointrusion Assessment (Cedar Creek, 2023)
Appendix G Results of Settlement Analyses
Appendix H Cracking Potential of Radon Barrier
Appendix I Technical Memorandum – Hydrology, Surface Cover Layer, and Diversion
Channel Design
Appendix J Mill Decommissioning Plan from Plateau Resources (Hydro-Engineering, 2005b)
J.1 Mill Decommissioning Plan (Hydro-Engineering, 2005b)
J.2 Derivation of Soil Cleanup Criteria (Hydro-Engineering, 2005b)
J.3 Natural Background Concentrations of Radionuclides in Soil
(Hydro-Engineering, 2005b)
J.4 Derivation of Surface Contamination Limits (Hydro-Engineering, 2005b)
J.5 Building Contamination Survey and Sampling Plan (Hydro-Engineering, 2005b)
J.6 Titles of Standard Operating Procedures (Hydro-Engineering, 2005b)
Appendix K Decommissioning and Reclamation Cost Estimate

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

Shootaring Rec Plan.docx viii Engineering Analytics, Inc.

ABBREVIATIONS

ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials
bgs Below Ground Surface
CCD Counter-current Decantation
cy Cubic Yards
DBS&A Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc.
DQO Data Quality Objectives
EA Engineering Analytics, Inc.
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
g The unit for peak ground acceleration, the acceleration due to Earth’s
gravity
IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
HDPE High Density Polyethylene
K Hydraulic Conductivity
MARSSIM Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual
MSL Mean Sea Level
NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission
pcf Pounds per Cubic Foot
pCi picoCuries
PI Plasticity Index
QAPP Quality Assurance Project Plan
SWCC Soil Water Characteristic Curves
SOPs Standard Operating Procedures
TEDE Total Effective Dose Equivalent
TSF Tailings Storage Facility
UMTRCA Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act
USCS Unified Soil Classification System
USGS United States Geological Survey
TSF Tailings Storage Facility
UDEQ/DWMRC Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Waste
Management and Radiation Control
DRC Division of Radiation Control

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 1 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

INTRODUCTION
Terms of Reference
This report presents the Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan for the Shootaring Canyon
Uranium Facility (Facility) in Garfield County, Utah. Anfield Resources Holding Corporation
(Anfield) developed this Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan in support of the amendment to
the radioactive license UT-0900480 (License) administrated by the Utah Department of
Environmental Quality, Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control (UDEQ/DWMRC
(formerly Division of Radiation Control (DRC)), to change the License status of the Facility from
Standby to Operational. This report has been prepared for Anfield by Engineering Analytics, Inc.
(EA). A list of references used to prepare this report is included in Section 10.

Updated Conditions
A previous Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan, submitted to the DRC by Plateau Resources,
Ltd. and Hydro-Engineering, LLC, was titled “Tailing Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan
for Shootaring Canyon Uranium Project – 2005 Garfield County, Utah” (Hydro-Engineering,
2005b). This Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan has been updated based upon the current
mill tailings facility design as presented in the report titled “Shootaring Canyon Uranium Mill
Facility Design Report” (Tetra Tech, 2008b), and addresses comments from DRC provided in
Interrogatory Rounds 2, 3, and 4 (URS, 2007, 2008a, 2008b). In general, the current reclamation
design addresses decommissioning of the expanded mill processing capacity of 1,000 tons per day
with a vanadium recovery circuit, one 30.6-acre tailings storage facility (TSF) cell and two Process
Ponds.

In general, closure of the Facility will include draining and regrading the tailings surface,
construction of final surface water diversion structures, mill decommissioning and site cleanup,
placement of an interim and final cover over the TSF, and reclamation of the South Dam
downstream face. The following sections discuss the closure of the facility in more detail.

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 2 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

CURRENT SITE CONDITIONS
Location and Land Use
The Facility is located in a sparsely populated area of Garfield County, southeastern Utah,
approximately 48 miles south of Hanksville, Utah, 13 miles north of Bullfrog Basin Marina, and
2 miles west of Utah State Highway 276 as shown on Figure 2-1. A small town, Ticaboo, is located
2.6 miles south of the Facility. A map of the Facility and surrounding area with some of the current
site features is presented on Figure 2-2.

Previous activities at the Facility are outlined in Hydro-Engineering (2005b) and Tetra Tech
(2008b) and are summarized here for reference. The Shootaring Canyon mill was designed and
constructed between 1978 and 1981. The mill was originally designed and licensed to process 750
tons/day of ore. The mill operated for 76 days in the spring and summer of 1982, processing
approximately 25,000 cubic yards of ore. The ore was processed in an acid leach circuit at an
average daily rate of 500 tons per day at an average ore grade of 0.15 percent U3O8. Tailings were
discharged as a slurry into the engineered tailings storage facility, consisting of an earthen and clay
dam constructed across a natural topographic depression. The existing tailings are located uphill
of the earthen and clay dam referred to as the cross-valley berm, on a clay liner system with a
French drain solution collection system above the natural sandstone. These tailings were
discharged into the Facility during April through August of 1982 (during the 76 days of operation).
The tailings currently occupy an area of approximately 2.49 acres and are stabilized by an interim
cover of local sands and soils.

Historically, the project area has been used for seasonal livestock grazing and as wildlife habitat.
Human use of the immediately surrounding area for other recreational activities has been minimal,
due to its isolated location and the availability of other more pristine areas in southeastern Utah
for human recreational activities.

Geology
The geologic conditions for the Facility were summarized in the Design Report (Tetra Tech,
2008b) from previous reports (Woodward Clyde Consultants, 1978 and Hydro-Engineering,
2005b). The site-specific geology information provided in the previous reports was reviewed and
summarized below for reference.

The mill is situated on a low mesa and a small, isolated catchment to the west contains the TSF. A
tall butte separates the Facility from Shitamaring Canyon. Drainage from the Facility is to the
southwest into Shitamaring Creek. The tributary in which the TSF is located has been called
Shootaring Canyon. Local relief ranges from 200 to 500 feet. Geologic structure is relatively
simple in the immediate area, with the various sedimentary formations dipping gently (2 to 3
degrees) to the west.

Sedimentary rocks exposed at the surface are predominantly sandstones of Upper Jurassic age.
The high buttes and mesas west and north of the Facility are capped by the Salt Wash Member of
the Morrison Formation. This fluvial sandstone unit contains the uranium deposits that are mined
in the area. Exposed cliffs surrounding the buttes and mesas are comprised primarily of the thinly
bedded reddish-brown siltstones and mudstones of the Summerville Formation, underlain by the
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 3 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

generally massive fine grained reddish-brown Entrada Sandstone. The Entrada Sandstone is the
bedrock underlying the mill and the TSF.

Based on the original geologic mapping completed by Woodward Clyde (1978) and the
information presented in Hydro-Engineering (2005b), the Entrada Formation has an approximate
thickness of 420 feet. Cementing agents are commonly calcite and ferric iron (Paster, 2002). The
depositional environment is believed to be primarily eolian. Shale is also present locally and is
evidence of episodes of marginal marine conditions.

No major faulting has been observed in the Entrada Sandstone at the Facility. Limited sets of joints
are widely spaced, steeply dipping and sealed with calcite and gypsum (Paster, 2002). Joint trends
are northwesterly and northeasterly, coinciding with the regional structural pattern.

Beneath the Entrada lies the Carmel Formation, which is a heterogeneous unit approximately 160
feet thick composed of sandstone, siltstone, mudstone, limestone, and gypsum. In the Shootaring
Canyon area, the Carmel Formation appears to include substantial layers of shale or mudstone.
The Carmel Formation is underlain by the Navajo Formation which is approximately 800 feet thick
in the vicinity of the Facility. The base of the Navajo is approximately 1,400 feet beneath the
surface of the Facility.

Fault development in the area is associated with the intrusive igneous centers of the Henry
Mountains. These faults commonly have a northeasterly or northwesterly strike and do not
generally extend far from the intrusive bodies. Faults are not known to exist within the Facility.

Results of 2023 Field Investigation
Engineering Analytics completed a field investigation that consisted of excavating test pits and
collecting samples in a proposed off-site clay borrow source area and collecting bulk samples of
sand and pediment material from proposed on-site borrow source areas at the Facility. The
characterization of the borrow sources is discussed further in Section 4.13.

The field investigation of the clay borrow source, conducted by EA, included excavation of eight
exploratory test pits (EA-TP1 through EA-TP8) on March 23 & 24 of 2023. Test pits were
excavated using a Komatsu Mini-Excavator. Test Pits EA-TP1 to EA-TP8 were excavated to
approximate depths of 7.5 feet, 5 feet, 3.5 feet, 6 feet, 6 feet, 7 feet, 7 feet, and 7 feet respectively.
The location of the test pits is shown on Figure 2-3. The test pit logs are included in Appendix A.
The subsurface conditions consisted of:

Clayey Gravel:
Clayey gravel was observed from 0 to 3 inches in test pit EA-TP1. The soil was medium dense
with some quarter-inch gravel up to 8-inch diameter cobbles.

Clay and Silty Clay/Clayey Silt
Clay and silty clay were encountered at or just below the surface in the test pits. The thickness of
the clay and silty clay was approximately 0.6 to greater than 7 feet thick. Clayey silt was
encountered in test pit EA-TP2 from a depth of 6 inches to 2 feet.

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 4 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

Weather Claystone, Claystone, and Shale:
The clay/silty clay is underlain by weathered claystone, unweathered claystone, and shale. The
thickness of the underlying claystone, weathered claystone, and shale is approximately 0.5 to 6.5
feet thick.

Sandstone:
Sandstone was encountered in test pits EA-TP3 and EA-TP4 from 2 feet below the ground surface.
Refusal in the sandstone was encountered between 3.5 feet and 6 feet.

EA also collected bulk samples of sand and pediment soils from proposed borrow sources at the
Facility. Laboratory testing was performed on selected samples from the test pits and bulk samples
to determine geotechnical engineering properties of the subsurface materials. This laboratory
testing is discussed in Section 2.4.2.

Results of Laboratory Testing for the Facility
Historical Laboratory Testing
Engineering Analytics personnel reviewed previous laboratory testing that has been completed for
the Facility. The results of that laboratory testing along with the laboratory testing that EA
completed in 2023 were used for the analyses performed for the reclamation plan design. The
previous laboratory testing that was used was obtained from Hydro Engineering (2005b), Tetra
Tech (2008a, 2008b) and Advanced Terra Testing (2008). The historical laboratory results that
were used are included Appendix B.1 through B.4. The use of historical laboratory test results is
discussed further in Section 4.

Laboratory Testing Completed in 2023
Laboratory testing was conducted on selected natural material samples to characterize their
physical and geotechnical properties for use in the reclamation design. Material samples were
obtained from EA-TP1 through EA-TP8 of the clay borrow source (see Figure 2-3), and bulk
samples of the aeolian sand and pediment materials to determine geotechnical engineering
properties (see Figure 4-17). Laboratory testing of materials sampled included measurement of
water content, dry density, Atterberg limits, grain size analyses, and standard Proctor compaction
tests. The laboratory testing was performed by Engineering Analytics and is summarized below.
The test pit geologic and sampling logs are included as Appendix A and laboratory reports from
testing of these material samples are included in Appendix B.5.

Water Content and Dry Density: Measurements of water content and dry density were conducted
on selected samples in accordance with ASTM test methods D2216 and D2937, respectively. The
water content of the samples of clay and silty clay that were tested ranged from 14.1 to 32.0
percent. The values of dry density for the samples of clay and silty clay that were tested ranged
from 79.0 to 101.9 pounds per cubic foot (pcf).

Atterberg Limits: Atterberg limits were measured on selected samples in accordance with ASTM
test method D4318. The Atterberg limits were used to aid in classifying the soil. According to the
Unified Soil Classification System (USCS), four samples were classified as low plasticity clay
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 5 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

(CL), four samples were classified as high plasticity clays (CH), the aeolian sand and pediment
samples were classified as non-plastic sand and silty sands (SM).

Grain Size: Grain size analyses were conducted on selected samples in accordance with ASTM
test method D6913. The sample of aeolian sand was 14% fines, 85% sand, and 1% gravel. The
sample of pediment was 24% fines, 68% sand, and 8% gravel.

Standard Proctor Compaction Tests: Six standard Proctor compaction tests were performed in
accordance with ASTM test method D698. For the clay to silty clay the maximum dry density
values ranged from 92.6 and 113.6 pcf with optimum water contents ranging from 15.11% to
30.2%. For the aeolian sand, the maximum dry density value was 114.6 pcf with an optimum water
content of 10.8% and for pediment borrow source the maximum dry density value was 119.3 pcf
with an optimum water content of 11.1%.

Additionally, Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc. (DBS&A) performed laboratory testing
including moisture content and density and determination of moisture characteristics for
completion of soil water characteristic curves (SWCCs) (Appendix B.6).

Seismicity
A probabilistic seismic hazard analysis was performed for the Facility and was presented as
Appendix A of the Tetra Tech Design Report (2008b). Engineering Analytics has updated the
seismic hazard analysis to incorporate updated seismic information from 2008 to the present. The
seismic hazard analysis is included as Appendix C of this Decommissioning and Reclamation Plan.
Results of the analysis demonstrated that the peak horizontal ground motion (PGA) for a 10,000
year return period is estimated to be 0.25g. This ground motion is almost entirely contributed to
background events not associated with a known Quaternary fault. Based on this maximum ground
acceleration, a pseudostatic coefficient of 2/3 the PGA (0.17g) was used for seismic analyses of
the reclaimed TSF.

Climate and Vegetation
The climate in the area is classified as arid with an average annual precipitation of approximately
six inches. The majority of the precipitation is in the form of rain. This area rarely sees
accumulation of snowfall generally between a quarter inch and 12 inches based on the Hanksville
Utah weather station data set. According to the Western Regional Climate Center, the average
annual pan evaporation in Page, Arizona and Moab, Utah is 80.57 inches and 71.56 inches,
respectively. The pan evaporation is multiped by a coefficient of 1.3 to calculate the natural
evaporation rates which results in rates of 104.74 inches per year for Page and 93.05 inches per
year for Moab. The average annual evaporation for the area is 98.9 inches. Temperatures in the
area range from 32 to 113 degrees Fahrenheit. According to the Tetra Tech Design Report (2008b),
the vegetation at the Facility consists predominantly of sagebrush, greasewood, and shadscale
saltbush.

Geohydrology
The Tetra Tech Design Report (2008b) summarized the geohydrology for the Facility from various
reports by Hydro-Engineering, LLC (1998, 1999, 2000 and 2005c) and from additional
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 6 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

groundwater monitoring data presented by Hydro-Engineering, LLC (2001, 2002, and 2005c) and
Tetra Tech (2007). A summary of this information is provided below for reference.

The uppermost groundwater beneath the TSF is in the Entrada Sandstone aquifer with water levels
approximately 140 feet below ground surface (bgs). As discussed above, total thickness of the
Entrada in the vicinity of the TSF is approximately 420 feet. Groundwater in the Entrada Aquifer
is present beneath the Facility at an elevation of approximately 4,250 feet mean sea level (MSL).
A shallower perched saturated zone is present in the Upper Entrada, in limited portions beneath
the Facility, at approximately 50 to 100 feet bgs. This shallower, localized occurrence of
groundwater appears to be associated with lower permeability sandstone units (based on previous
interpretations of the Neutron logs within the Upper Entrada).

Based on potentiometric data, the groundwater flow direction in the Entrada Aquifer is generally
towards the south with a hydraulic gradient of approximately 0.01 foot/foot. Groundwater velocity
within the Entrada is estimated to be less than 10 feet per year. The perched saturated zone of the
Upper Entrada is not continuous across the Facility and appears to be limited to the south-central
portion of the Facility.

The top of the Carmel Formation is considered the base of the uppermost groundwater beneath the
Facility. The Carmel Formation is present beneath the Facility at an elevation of 3,900 to 3,950
feet MSL. The water level difference between the Entrada Sandstone and the Navajo Sandstone of
approximately 200 feet indicates that the Carmel Formation is an effective confining unit between
those aquifers.

Existing Milling Facility Conditions
The facilities that exist at the mill site and TSF are illustrated in Figure 2-4. Major Facility features
include the mill and associated support buildings. Several existing ore stockpiles are adjacent to
the mill and the TSF.

Figure 2-4 shows the TSF and includes the location of historical tailings deposition from the 1982
operations, which were only discharged upstream of the cross-valley berm. This figure also shows
the east dike and north dike which bound the existing tailings.

The mill building contains the ore grinding and extraction circuits and the yellowcake drying and
packaging area. The plant facilities addressed in the Decommissioning and Reclamation Plan
include the laboratory and shop buildings, generator building, exterior reagent storage tanks, fuel
storage tanks, ore stockpiles, and outside materials storage areas as shown on Figure 2-5. Counter-
current decantation (CCD) tanks and reagent tanks are on an exterior concrete pad. During mill
operations, ore was stockpiled at the prepared ore pad just north of the mill after being weighed on
the receiving scale. Ore was sampled prior to entering the mill building. As mentioned above, the
mill tailings were discharged as a slurry to the TSF west of the mill.

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 7 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

TSF RECLAMATION CRITERIA
In general, this reclamation plan has been prepared according to 40 CFR Part 192 Subpart D (EPA,
2018), 10 CFR Part 40, Appendix A (NRC, 2016) and Utah regulations (Utah Administrative Code
R313-24, 2016) and the guidance in the NRC Standard Review Plan (NUREG-1620). The
reclamation goal is to restore lands disturbed by project activities (except for the tailings cell(s))
for unrestricted release and use consistent with past and present area uses. It should be noted that
this area and southern Utah in general, are considered very unproductive for human use with little
native plant growth due to soil and climate characteristics. The low average annual precipitation
of 7 inches, frequent droughts, extreme temperatures, high wind erosion, and a loose, and
undifferentiated soil profile with poor moisture-holding capacity and little organic content are a
few of those characteristics.

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 8 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

TSF RECLAMATION PLAN
General
Dewatering of the tailings is expected to occur over one year after the end of mill operations (Tetra
Tech, 2008b). EA has not performed additional analysis of duration of tailings dewatering. EA
designed the cover system and reclamation activities based on the fact that the tailings in the TSF
will be dewatered prior to the start of reclamation activities.

Reclamation of the TSF will be conducted in two phases. The first phase will consist of placement
of an interim cover and the second phase will consist of placement of the final cover. The estimated
tailings surface at the end of operations is shown on Figure 4-1. Mill debris from the mill
demolition, liners and other debris and contaminated soils from the process ponds, and tailings
from the cross-valley berm area will be added to the TSF after tailing dewatering. The tailings
surface will be regraded to promote drainage and the interim cover will be placed on the regraded
tailings surface. Debris from the mill, process pond, and cross-valley berm, that will be added to
the TSF, includes all materials and plant equipment unsuitable for unrestricted release. The volume
of mill and other miscellaneous debris anticipated for disposal into the tailings cell is estimated to
be 26,000 cubic yards. The mill and miscellaneous debris will be placed within the tailings
impoundment and the voids will be filled with flowable fill to provide a structurally stable waste
as required in 10 CFR 61.56. Further discussion of the mill debris is presented in Section 5.0. The
tailings surface will be regraded with a reclamation slope of 1.0 percent from the west to east as
shown on Figure 4-2 after cessation of operations and drainage of the tailings pore water. The
interim cover consists of 18 inches of grading sand. The interim cover is shown on Figure 4-3.
Discussion of the interim cover is presented in Section 4.2. It is anticipated that 97,000 cubic yards
of on-site aeolian sand material will be required for the interim cover. Further discussion of
material volumes required for the interim cover and the tailings regrading plan is presented in
Section 4.12.

During the initial reclamation phase of the tailings and placement of the interim cover, offsite
runoff will be minimized by regrading the top of the mill site and East Bluff to drain to the north
and into the South Process Pond. Once the mill site and process ponds are reclaimed, the mill site
drainage will be connected to the main diversion channel. The remaining offsite drainage area to
the north and east of the TSF will be collected in a rock-lined channel, designed for the Probable
Maximum Flood (PMF), and conveyed along the north and east side of the TSF. The diversion
channel will ultimately discharge into a natural drainage to the southeast of the TSF. Discussion
of the site hydrology analysis, surface cover layer design, and diversion channel design is
presented in Section 4.11 and in Appendix I. The offsite drainage to the west of the TSF will sheet
flow over the final tailings cover and will flow into the east drainage channel. Additionally, the
slope of the South Dam will be flattened to a 5:1 (H:V) slope as part of the reclamation design.

The second phase of reclamation will consist of placement of the final cover after primary
settlement of the tailings have occurred due to tailings regrading and placement of the mill debris
and the interim cover. The final cover will be placed over the interim cover after the tailings have
achieved 90% settlement from the interim cover placement. Additional interim cover will be in
place to camber the surface by the amount of predicted final cover settlement, prior to placement
of the final cover. The final cover consists of a clay layer to act as barrier for infiltration and radon
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 9 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

emanation, a sand layer to provide a capillary break, a layer of pediment soils for biointrusion and
frost protection, and a layer of rock mulch for erosion protection. The total cover thickness,
including the interim cover, is 96 inches. EA performed analyses in support of the cover design
including: 1) frost protection analysis (Section 4.3), 2) radon attenuation (Section 4.4), 3)
biointrusion analysis (Section 4.5), 4) infiltration analysis (Section 4.6), and 5) erosion protection
calculations (Section 4.11). Based on the layer thickness of the final cover system, it is anticipated
that 78,200 cubic yards of sand will be required to adjust the camber on the interim cover after
settlement, and 65,000 cubic yards of clay, 65,000 cubic yards of sand, 274,300 cubic yards of
pediment soils, and 20,500 cubic yards of rock will be needed for the final cover. Figure 4-4 shows
the final cover surface and grading, and the diversion channel. Final reclamation cross sections are
shown on Figure 4-5 and Figure 4-6. A schematic of the final cover profile is illustrated in Figure
4-7. Further discussion of material volumes required for the final cover is presented in Section
4.12.

A borrow source characterization was completed by EA in order to determine optimum locations
of borrow source material for the TSF cover and site reclamation construction. Quantities of
available volumes for each material type were calculated based on the area and estimated depth of
material for each borrow source. Discussion of the borrow source characterization is presented in
Section 4.13. Quantities of cut and fill volumes for the final cover of the TSF are discussed in
Section 4.12.

Description of Cover
After tailings regrading, an interim cover will be placed over the tailings. The interim cover shall
include a minimum of 18 inches of grading sand to allow for the top surface of the interim cover
to be a uniform grade as well as provide a firm base for the compaction of the clay liner.

The final cover system will consist of the following layers from top to bottom:

• 12 inches of rock mulch cover for erosion protection;
• 42 inches of onsite pediment soils for biointrusion and frost protection;
• 12 inches of sand for a capillary break;
• 12 inches of clay layer to minimize infiltration and emanation of radon gas; and
• A minimum of 18 inches of interim cover above the tailings.

A schematic of the cover is illustrated in Figure 4-7. Analyses for the cover design are summarized
in the following sections.

Frost Penetration Analysis
Engineering Analytics, Inc. determined the frost penetration for the final cover and the results are
included in Appendix D. The frost depth penetration into the final reclamation cover for the TSF
was determined using the procedure adopted by the U.S. Department of Energy and accepted by
the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (DOE, 1989). The depth of freezing into the cover (depth of
frost penetration) is governed by the local climate, soil material, and soil moisture content expected
during the operational life of the cover. The procedure used includes a computational procedure to
predict frost depth which was initially proposed by Berggren (1943). Smith and Rager (2002) apply
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 10 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

these previous studies to determine an adequate thickness of a protective soil layer to protect an
underlying compacted soil. The freezing depth was calculated for a 200-year recurrence interval
(0.5% probability of occurrence in any given year). The frost penetration depth into the final cover
for the 200-year recurrence interval was calculated to be 40 inches. The total thickness of material
over the radon barrier is proposed to be 66 inches. Thus, the radon barrier is not anticipated to
experience any impacts from freezing.

Radon Attenuation
Modeling was performed for the emanation of radon-222 from the top surface of the proposed
cover over the TSF. The radon attenuation modeling was updated from the previous reclamation
plan (Hydro-Engineering, 2005b). The updated modeling includes the revised cover design,
updated information regarding the expected ore grade, and cover material and tailings testing
conducted in 2008 and 2023. The rock mulch layer was not included in the radon modeling.

The radon emanation modeling shows that the planned cover system reduces the rate of radon
emanation to zero at the top of the radon barrier layer is below the NRC limit of 20 picocuries per
square meter per second (pCi/m2-sec) averaged over the entire TSF. Detailed discussion and
modeling results are provided in Appendix E.

Biointrusion
Cedar Creek Associates, Inc. (Cedar Creek, 2023) conducted an assessment of biointrusion risk,
from vegetation and burrowing animals, for cover performance at the Facility. The technical
memorandum completed by Cedar Creek is included in Appendix F. To complete the assessment,
Cedar Creek conducted a literature study of local soils, vegetation, and wildlife to understand the
potential for biointrusion on the Facility cover.

Cover design parameters include a water evacuation layer comprised of sand, allowing excess
water to flow down slope and off the cover, keeping the compacted clay layer below unsaturated.
It is still necessary to consider the risks of biointrusion of the clay layer. Cedar Creek concluded
that the risk of vegetation biointrusion on the Facility cover is limited. Native shrub species most
likely to volunteer as cover, such as Blackbrush, are expected to have a maximum root penetration
depth of 12 inches. Deep groundwater will force shrubs to engage in lateral rooting activity to take
advantage of moisture perched on hardpan layers of the cover. Compacted clay and hardpan layers
are likely to restrict vertical root growth as long as the cover is effectively working. They also
concluded that the risk of animal/insect biointrusion is limited. Without vegetation establishment
to provide habitat and food sources, insects and animals are unlikely to seek out the cover to
inhabit. The cover will also be surrounded by previously disturbed areas at the Facility with
diminished habitat quality. Coarse rock material and compacted clay layers included in the cover
design reduce the risk of deep burrowing by the local species.

Infiltration Analysis
General
Analyses were performed to calculate infiltration rates on the surface of the tailings impoundment
for use in the seepage modeling to evaluate the infiltration at the bottom of the final cover. The
actual boundary condition for the surface of the final cover is the climatological conditions. In
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 11 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

order to simulate the climatological surface conditions in the SEEP/W model (GEO-SLOPE,
2023), a net flux was determined by modeling a representative 2-D column and then applying that
net flux as the boundary conditions.

Method of Analysis
Infiltration analyses were conducted using the computer program SEEP/W (GEO-SLOPE, 2023),
a finite-element method of analysis capable of modeling the movement and distribution of pore
water within porous materials. SEEP/W can simulate both saturated and unsaturated flow in
response to atmospheric conditions. This enables the analysis of seepage over time and provides
results encompassing infiltration, precipitation, surface water runoff and ponding, plant
transpiration, and actual evaporation, which play a crucial role in the designing of the cover system.
The rigorous calculation of the seepage analysis requires input parameters including temperature,
relative humidity, wind speed, albedo, rainfall, material properties, material hydraulic
conductivity, etc.

The two-dimensional model with a 1% slope of the cover system was utilized to analyze infiltration
out of the bottom of the cover system. The model profile is depicted on Figure 4-8. The value of
the thickness for each material layer in the model profile is provided in Table 4-1. Transient
analysis was performed with synthetic climate data over a model time period of one thousand years
to analyze the percolation rate, precipitation, surface water runoff, and evapotranspiration during
this period. To accommodate the lateral flow of precipitation on the sloped cover surface, surface
water runoff was allowed on the ground surface in the model. Runoff can be handled in the 2-D
model in SEEP/W by not allowing surface water to pond at the cover surface. The volume of water
that could pond is then represented as runoff.

Parameters Used for Analysis
Climate Data
Daily climate data including precipitation, evaporation, minimum and maximum temperatures,
relative humidity, and average wind speed was used for the analyses. Historical climate data was
obtained for the 50-year period between 1973 and 2023 from the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) weather stations for Hanksville, Utah (Station Number
023170), Grand Junction, Colorado (Station Number 023066), and the Page, Arizona airport
(Station Number 03162). A summary of the climate data sources is presented in Table 4-2.

The city of Hanksville, Arizona is approximately 48 miles from the Facility and 100 feet different
in elevation from the Facility. This station was chosen due to the relative proximity to the Facility,
the quantity of data (50 years), and the availability of temperature, relative humidity, average daily
wind speed, and precipitation data. This station was selected as the primary source of historical
weather data.

The city of Grand Junction, Colorado is approximately 150 miles from the Facility and 300 feet
different in elevation from the Facility. This station was chosen as an alternative source of
historical weather data due to the quantity of data (75 years), and the availability of temperature,
relative humidity, and precipitation data. This alternative data source was used when data was
unavailable or missing from the primary data source.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 12 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

The city of Page, Arizona is approximately 68 miles from the Facility and 130 feet different in
elevation from the Facility. This station was chosen as an alternative source of historical weather
data due to the relative proximity to the Facility, the quantity of data (51 years), and the availability
of temperature, relative humidity, average daily wind speed, and precipitation. This alternative
data source was used when data was unavailable or missing from the primary data source.

The closest weather station to the Facility is located at Bullfrog Basin, UT (Station Number
421020) which is approximately 10 miles from the Facility and is approximately 578 feet different
in elevation from the Facility. The average annual precipitation for the Bullfrog weather station is
5.71 inches. The Bullfrog weather station was not chosen for the analyses due to insufficient
evaporation and relative humidity data.

A synthetic 1,000-year meteorological time series data set was created to use as input in the
ClimGen program (ClimGen, 2023) with the historical meteorological data used for
parameterization. ClimGen was developed by Washington State University and generates realistic
meteorological time series data from existing daily weather records. A comparison of summary
statistics from the historical meteorological data set and the synthetic 1,000-year meteorological
data set is provided in Table 4-3. The maximum, minimum, and standard deviation for each input
parameter in the 1,000-year meteorological data set are summarized in Table 4-4.

In general, modeling results from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2023)
indicate a general warming and drying trend. Thus, the climate data used in the modeling is
anticipated to be conservative in relation to the potential for percolation through the bottom of the
cover.
Soil Properties
The soil parameters for the materials used in the analyses are summarized in Table 4-1. The
majority of the parameters were obtained from the laboratory testing results provided by EA as
discussed in Section 2.4.2, Hydro Engineering (2005b), and Tetra Tech (2008a, 2008b). The results
of the EA laboratory testing and the relevant historical laboratory testing are included in Appendix
B. The remaining parameters were estimated based on typical values for the respective material
types from technical literature.

The soil water characteristic curves (SWCCs) for the rock mulch, pediment layer, sand layer, and
interim cover were estimated using SEEP/W (GEO-SLOPE, 2023). The grain size distribution and
porosity data obtained from the laboratory testing by EA, for the cover materials, were used in the
estimation. The SWCC for the sandstone layer was estimated using the Fredlund-Xing Function
incorporating curve fit parameters (a, n, and m) and porosity based on the Tetra Tech Design
Report (2008b). The SWCC for the clay layer was constructed based on laboratory testing results
obtained from the EA-TP4 sample (DBS&A in Appendix B.6). The SWCC for the tailing slurry
was obtained from the Tetra Tech Design Report (2008b). The SWCCs for the materials used in
the analyses are shown on Figure 4-9.

The hydraulic conductivity (K) functions for the materials, except for the compacted clay in the
liner system, were estimated using the Fredlund-Xing Huang method in the SEEP/W program. The
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 13 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

SWCCs and the saturated hydraulic conductivity values shown in Table 4-1 were used to estimate
the K functions. The K functions for the materials used in the analyses are shown on Figure 4-10.
The compacted clay in the liner system was assumed to be saturated, and the saturated K value for
the compacted clay was obtained from the Tetra Tech Design Report (2008b).

Boundary Conditions
A steady-state model was used to set up the initial conditions for the infiltration analyses. The
initial water content values shown in Table 4-1 for the materials were used to set the initial negative
pore water pressure conditions for the model in accordance with the SWCCs of the materials.

For the 1,000-year transient model, the climate data discussed in Section 4.6.3.1 were used as an
upper boundary condition at the ground surface. A unit gradient boundary condition was specified
at the bottom boundary of the sandstone foundation. This boundary simulated the deep boundary
condition where the groundwater table was located far away, preventing it from disturbing the
upper model. The pore water pressure distribution obtained from the steady-state model was used
as the initial conditions of the transient model.

Results of Analysis
Table 4-5 summarizes the results of the water balance components for the cover system determined
from the 1,000-year transient model. The mean annual value of each component was calculated
using the cumulative water volumes normalized by the cross-sectional area of the model at the end
of the analysis. The results of the modeling are summarized in Table 4-5. The model results
indicate that the mean annual percolation value through the cover system is 0.45 inches/year or
7.4% of the mean annual precipitation value.

Caldwell et al. (2022) studied the ratio of percolation to precipitation at various Uranium Mill
Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) sites. They concluded that the ratio of percolation to
precipitation ranges from 0 to 26%, with a mean value of 7%. Consequently, the ratio of
percolation to precipitation of 7.4% determined for the Facility is reasonable compared to other
sites presented in Caldwell et al. (2022).

Allowable Leakage Rate
The Shootaring TSF is underlain by a Geomembrane liner system to control seepage. The liner
consists, from bottom to top, of a minimum 12-inch compacted clay linear, secondary 60-mil
HDPE geomembrane, HDPE geonet as the leak detection system, a primary 60-mil HDPE
geomembrane, a cushioning layer of 10 ounces per square yard nonwoven geotextile, and a
minimum 18-inch thick layer of gravel (Tetra Tech, 2008b). The action leakage rate based on a
0.079-inch diameter defect per acre is presented in Appendix G.1 of the Tetra Tech Design Report
(2008b). The action leakage rate was calculated to be 130 gallons/day per acre. The action leakage
rate was converted to an annual percolation rate of 1.74 inches per year as shown below.
�130 𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑑𝑑𝑔𝑔𝑑𝑑�∗ �
0.13368𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓31 𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔� ∗�1 𝑔𝑔𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎43,560 𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓2 �∗�12 𝑖𝑖𝑔𝑔𝑎𝑎ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑔𝑔1 𝑓𝑓𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑓𝑓�∗�365 𝑑𝑑𝑔𝑔𝑑𝑑1 𝑑𝑑𝑎𝑎𝑔𝑔𝑎𝑎�= 1.74 𝑖𝑖𝑔𝑔𝑎𝑎ℎ𝑎𝑎𝑔𝑔𝑑𝑑𝑎𝑎𝑔𝑔𝑎𝑎

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 14 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

The allowable leakage rate out of the liner at the bottom of the impoundment (1.74 inches/year) is
3.8 times the cover infiltration rate (0.45 inches/year).

Settlement Analysis
General
This section presents the results of the settlement analysis for the TSF. The settlement of the TSF
includes settlement due to tailings draindown, consolidation settlement due to loading, and
long-term settlement (creep). Tetra Tech (2008b) estimated that the draindown of the tailings
would occur in one year. Thus, this report assumes that the interim grading and cover would be
placed after draindown and associated settlement had occurred. Thus, settlement of the tailings
due to draindown is not presented herein. The thickness of the tailings used for the settlement
analyses is presented on Figure G-1.

The methods and results of the analyses are presented in the following sections.
Method of Analysis
The settlement of the tailings was calculated using the following equation:
St = Sdd + Sci + + Scf + Ss

Where: St = total settlement
Sdd = settlement due to draindown
Sci = consolidation settlement (tailings regrading and interim cover)
Sct = consolidation settlement (final cover)
Ss = long-term (creep) settlement.

Material Properties
The soil parameters for the materials used in the settlement analyses are summarized in Table 4-6.
The sources for the soil parameters are listed in the notes for the table. The parameters were
estimated based on typical values for the material type and laboratory testing results. Settlement
of the tailings was calculated based on the laboratory testing on the tailings conducted by Tetra
Tech (2008b).

Consolidation Settlement due to Tailings Regrading and Interim Cover Placement
The consolidation settlement due to tailings regrading and interim cover placement was calculated
using traditional consolidation theory. The loads on the tailings were assumed to include the loads
from the tailings regrading and interim cover. The difference in the thickness of the tailings after
tailings regrading is presented on Figure G-2.

The consolidation settlement was computed using the well-known equation,
∆𝜌𝜌=𝐶𝐶𝑐𝑐 ∆𝑧𝑧(1 +𝑎𝑎𝑜𝑜) 𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔 (𝜎𝜎′vo +∆𝜎𝜎′v𝜎𝜎′vo )

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 15 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

Where, ∆𝜌𝜌 = increment of settlement 𝐶𝐶𝑐𝑐 = Compression Index
eo = initial void ratio of the soil ∆𝑧𝑧 = thickness of the layer for which the increment of settlement is being computed 𝜎𝜎′vo = initial overburden stress ∆𝜎𝜎′v = applied stress

The values of the Compression Index were measured from the oedometer test results of the tailings,
as presented in the Tetra Tech Design Report (2008b). Results of the consolidation settlement are
presented in Appendix G. The maximum consolidation settlement of the tailings due to tailings
regrading and interim cover placement is 13.6 inches.

Consolidation Settlement due to Final Cover Placement
The consolidation settlement due to final cover placement was calculated using traditional
consolidation theory. The loads on the tailings were assumed to include the loads from the tailings
final cover.

The consolidation settlement was computed using the well-known equation,
∆𝜌𝜌=𝐶𝐶𝑐𝑐 ∆𝑧𝑧(1 +𝑎𝑎𝑜𝑜) 𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔 (𝜎𝜎′vo +∆𝜎𝜎′v𝜎𝜎′vo )

Where, ∆𝜌𝜌 = increment of settlement 𝐶𝐶𝑐𝑐 = Compression Index
eo = initial void ratio of the soil ∆𝑧𝑧 = thickness of the layer for which the increment of settlement is being computed 𝜎𝜎′vo = initial overburden stress ∆𝜎𝜎′v = applied stress

The values of the Compression Index were measured from the oedometer test results of the tailings,
as presented in the Tetra Tech Design Report (2008b). Results of the consolidation settlement are
presented in Appendix G. The maximum consolidation settlement of the tailings due to final cover
placement is 16.8 inches.

Long-term (Creep) Settlement
Long-term (creep) settlement takes place at a constant effective stress after essentially all excess
pore pressures have dissipated. The long-term settlement was calculated using the results of
laboratory tests for processed tailings and traditional secondary settlement theory. The secondary
settlements are based on a time equal to the design life of 1,000 years.

The secondary settlement was computed using the well-known equation,

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 16 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

𝑆𝑆𝑠𝑠=𝐶𝐶𝛼𝛼 𝐻𝐻0(1 +𝑎𝑎𝑜𝑜) 𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔 (𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑝𝑝)

Where,
Ss = increment of settlement 𝐶𝐶𝛼𝛼 = Secondary Compression Index
eo = initial void ratio of the soil 𝐻𝐻0 = thickness of the drainage layer 𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓 = design life of the cover 𝑓𝑓𝑝𝑝 = time for primary consolidation settlement to be completed

The values of the Compression Index were measured from the oedometer test results of the tailings,
as presented in the Tetra Tech Design Report (2008b). Results of the secondary settlement are
presented in Appendix G. The calculated settlement of the tailings due to creep is 0.05 inches.

Total Settlement
The settlements due to tailings regrading, interim cover loading, and final cover loading for the
TSF were determined by the settlement analyses in accordance with Section 2.5 of NUREG-1620
(NRC, 2003). The total settlement anticipated for the TSF after tailings regrading, interim cover
placement, and final cover placement was calculated as the sum of consolidation settlement due to
tailings regrading and interim cover placement, consolidation settlement due to final cover
placement, and long-term consolidation (creep). For the analyses, it was assumed that the soil
under the TSF will not exhibit any settlement under construction or operation loading conditions.
The total settlement of the TSF was calculated for the full thickness of tailings. The total settlement
was calculated for 100-foot centers across the TSF at the locations shown on Figure G-3. These
contours were used to compute the cracking potential of the radon barrier. The calculated
maximum total settlement is 29.8 inches.

The final cover will be subjected to 10% of the settlement from tailings regrading and interim
cover placement, settlement due to consolidation due to placement of the final cover, and
settlement due to long-term consolidation (creep). The calculated values of this settlement are
presented in Appendix G. The interim cover surface will be adjusted with grading sand prior to
the construction of the final cover, so that the after-settlement surface will have a planar final
surface as shown on Figure 4-4. The amount of camber built into the top of the interim cover with
the grading will be reflected in the final after constructed surface as shown on Figure 4-4. The
final planar cover surface is also shown on Figure 4-4. The calculated maximum total settlement
for the cover cracking analyses is 18.1 inches.

Cracking Potential of Radon Barrier
General
Horizontal strain analyses were conducted to determine if differential settlements will cause
cracking of the radon barrier and reduce its effectiveness to attenuate radon flux. The total
settlement used for the cover cracking was assumed to be 10% of the settlement from tailings
regrading and interim cover placement, settlement due to consolidation due to placement of the
final cover, and settlement due to long-term consolidation (creep). The calculated maximum total
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 17 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

settlement for the cover cracking analyses is 18.1 inches. The results of this analysis are presented
in Appendix H. Cross sections H1 through H2, shown in Appendix H, were evaluated. Cross
sections H1 and H2 were selected as the locations with the greatest difference in settlement across
the cross-section profile. The total settlement and local slope profiles along cross sections H1 and
H2 are presented on Figures H-1 and H-2, respectively. The procedure for determining cracking
potential is presented in the following sections.

Horizontal Movement Profile
The horizontal movement at the top of the radon barrier was calculated based on the following
equation (Lee and Shen, 1969):
𝑚𝑚=23 𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻�12 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓� (Equation 18)

Where, m = horizontal movement in inches
H = thickness of relatively incompressible material (radon barrier overlying the
relocated contaminated materials (tailings))
α = local slope of the settlement profile (expressed as decimal fraction) which is
determined graphically

The horizontal movement profiles along cross sections H1 and H2 are presented on Figures H-3
and H-4, respectively.

Horizontal Strain
The horizontal strain at any given point is the slope of the horizontal movement profile at that
point. This slope was determined graphically, and the horizontal strain along cross sections H1
and H2 is shown on Figures H-3 and H-4. The maximum tensile strains along the top of the radon
barrier for these cross sections are summarized in Table 4-7.

Tensile Strain to Cause Cracking
Morrison-Knudsen Environmental Corporation (1993) presented a method for determining the
tensile strain required to cause cracking of the radon barrier as a function of the plasticity index
(PI) and the moisture content of the soil. The tensile strain at cracking is calculated as follows:
𝜀𝜀𝑓𝑓(%)= 0.05 + 0.003(𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃) (Equation 19)

Where, εf (%) = tensile strain to cause cracking of the radon barrier
PI = plasticity index of radon barrier

The plasticity index (PI) of the radon barrier material was determined through laboratory testing
of the clay borrow source and ranged from 19 to 54. The PI was used for the analyses. The tensile
strain to cause cracking, based on a PI of 19, is 0.10 percent. The maximum horizontal tensile
strains calculated for cross sections G1 and G2 was 0.0022 percent, and this indicated that cover
cracking will not occur.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 18 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

Individual spreadsheet calculations of the cracking potential are presented in Appendix H.

Slope Stability Analysis
General
Geotechnical slope stability analyses were performed to assess the global stability of the South
Dam after reclamation. The stability analyses conducted for reclamation conditions conservatively
assumed full saturation conditions of the tailings. The global stability analyses were based upon
average tailings properties and provide an indication of the factor of safety against large-scale
shear failure within the embankment. The slope stability analyses do not reflect the effects of any
heterogeneities within the impoundment.

Method of Analysis
Limit equilibrium global stability analyses were performed using the Morgenstern-Price method
(Morgenstern-Price, 1965), as implemented in the computer program SLOPE/W (GEO-SLOPE
International, Ltd. 2021). Section A, shown on Figure 4-4, was used for the analyses. The
simplified stratigraphic section used in the analyses is shown on Figure 4-11. Both static stability
and pseudo-static seismic stability analyses were performed. The target factor of safety (FOS) for
static global stability was selected to be 1.5 based on NRC (1989). The target FOS for pseudo-
static global stability was selected to be 1.1 based on NRC (1989). Both rotational (circular) and
wedge (block) mechanisms were analyzed for each scenario and condition.

As described in Section 2.5, the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for the Facility indicates a
peak ground acceleration (PGA) of 0.25g for a 10,000 year return period, equivalent to a 10 percent
chance of exceedance in the 1,000 year design life of the TSF. A horizontal coefficient of 2/3 of
the PGA, or 0.17g, was used for the pseudo-static analyses.

Slope stability analyses were performed utilizing circular and sliding block-wedge slope failure
modes. The critical circular shear surface was determined by selecting a grid of center points for
potential failure circles and computing the minimum factor of safety for each point on the grid for
various circular radii. The critical circular failure surface is that which results in the minimum
computed factor of safety against shear failure. The grid was adjusted over several iterations to
assure the critical failure surface was found. The critical sliding block-wedge failure surface was
determined in a similar manner by computing the factor of safety against shear failure for a range
of block-wedge surfaces approximated by two or three straight lines.

Material Properties
Soil properties used in the stability analyses were consistent with those used in the Tetra Tech
Design Report (2008b). The soil properties used in these stability analyses are summarized in
Table 4-8.

Results of Analysis
Results of the slope stability analyses indicate minimum factors of safety of 3.9 for static
conditions and 2.1 for pseudo-static conditions which exceed the minimum criteria established by
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 19 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

the NRC (1989). The results of the slope stability analyses are shown on Figures 4-12 through 4-
15 and summarized in Table 4-9.

Surface Water Hydrology and Erosion Protection
The reclaimed TSF will be protected from water and wind erosion through a combination of offsite
runoff diversion and rock mulch surface facing, discussed separately below.

Offsite Runoff Diversion
Offsite drainage areas to the north and east of the TSF, excluding the mill site, will be collected in
a rock-lined channel, designed for the Probable Maximum Flood (PMF), and conveyed along the
north and east side of the TSF. Offsite runoff from the mill site and East Bluff will drain to the
north into the South Process Pond during the interim period. Once the mill site and east bluff is
reclaimed the drainage ditches will be extended to the main rock-lined channel. The diversion
channel will ultimately discharge into a natural drainage to the southeast of the TSF. The proposed
diversion will have a 20-foot bottom width, 0.5% longitudinal slope, and 3:1 side slope. Adjacent
to the TSF, the side slope will be 5:1. The minimum channel depth will vary from 8.3 to 9.3 ft,
and the channel will be lined with a 24-inch-thick layer of 12-inch riprap. Design calculations and
diversion channel details are provided in Appendix I.

Rock Mulch Cover
The main TSF cover will be sloped at 1.0% and will incorporate a 1-ft thick top layer of rock
mulch, consisting of a rock/soil admixture. The admixture design consists of 30 percent AASHTO
No. 1 gravel and 70 percent pediment material. The rock mulch has been designed with a flow
concentration factor of 3. At the interface between the TSF cover and the west bluff, a 20-foot-
wide strip of 12-inch riprap (identical to that used for channel lining) will provide an erosion-
resistant area for redistribution of any flow concentrations arriving from the west bluff. The eastern
5:1 outslope of the TSF cover will also be lined with 12-inch riprap, smoothly transitioning into
the channel side slopes. Design calculations are provided in Appendix I.

Grading
As previously discussed in Section 4.1, the estimated tailings surface at the end of operations as
shown on Figure 4-1 will be regraded with a reclamation slope of 1.0 percent from the west to east.
The regraded reclamation slope is shown on Figure 4-2. Runoff from the tailings surface, after
cover placement, will be into a diversion channel along the east edge of the TSF. The area to the
east of the TSF will be regraded for the construction of the diversion channel. The area to the north
of the TSF will be regraded to promote drainage of the surface water into the diversion channel.
Figure 4-3 shows the interim cover and Figure 4-4 shows the final cover surface and grading, the
diversion channel, and the north, south, and east grading areas. Final reclamation cross sections
are shown on Figure 4-5 and Figure 4-6. The analyses presented in the preceding sections were
used to design the final cover design and thicknesses.

The quantities of cut and fill for the tailings surface regrading will be 44,700 cubic yards and
80,400 cy, respectively. The difference between cut and fill is approximately 35,700 cy of fill. Of
this quantity of fill required, 26,000 cubic yards are estimated to be mill debris from the mill
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 20 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

demolition (Hydro-Engineering, 2005b) and 9,700 cubic yards of fill will be onsite soils/rock
sourced from onsite borrow areas.

The cut and fill quantities for final reclamation are summarized in Table 4-10. Approximately
65,000 cy of fill will be required for the 12-inch compacted clay layer, and approximately 274,300
cubic yards of fill will be required for the 42-inch pediment layer. Approximately 270,000 cubic
yards of fill of rock material will be required for the 12-in rock mulch layer, diversion channel,
north area grading, and south area grading. Approximately, 295,000 cubic yards of cut in rock
material will be obtained from the east area grading, and 36,000 cubic yards of cut of pediment
material will be obtained from the east area grading. Approximately 240,200 cubic yards fill be
required for the 18-inch interim sand cover, re-cambering after primary consolidation settlement,
and for the 12-inch sand layer as part of the final cover. The total estimated quantity of clay,
pediment, sand, and rock required for reclamation activities is 849,500 cubic yards of fill material.

Borrow Source Location and Characterization
The tailings cover system will consist of (from bottom to top) interim cover, clay (radon barrier),
sand (capillary break), pediment layer (biointrusion and frost protection), and a rock mulch layer
(erosion protection). Rock will also be required for the riprap and bedding within the diversion
channel. The proposed cover system is shown in Figure 4-7. This section discusses the location
and characterization of the borrow source areas for the proposed cover materials.

Borrow Source Locations
A lease for the clay borrow source was procured from the State of Utah School and Institutional
Trust Lands Administration. The borrow source lease identification is ML 54316 ROME and
consists of approximately 620 acres located in Township 36 South, Range 9 East, Section 2. The
approximate location of the clay borrow source is shown in Figure 4-16. Borrow source locations
for the pediment, rock and sand were identified on the Shootaring property as shown on
Figure 4-17.

Borrow Source Characterization
Clay Borrow Source
The field investigation of the clay borrow source, conducted by EA, included excavation of eight
exploratory test pits as discussed in Section 2.3. The test pit locations are shown on Figure 2-3 and
the test pit logs are included in Appendix A. EA encountered clay and silty clay/clayey silt,
weathered claystone, claystone, shale, and sandstone in the test pits. The shale blocks broke down
by soaking them in a bucket overnight. Thus, it is anticipated that shale can easily be processed
for use in the radon barrier.

Pediment and Sand Borrow Source
A borrow source for the pediment and sand soils exists at the Facility as shown on Figure 4-17.
According to the Tetra Tech Design Report (2008b), the deposit of pediment is 17 feet thick and
the deposit of sand is 30 feet thick. As discussed in Section 2.4.2, samples of the pediment and
sand borrow sources were collected for laboratory testing. The laboratory test results are included
in Appendix B.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 21 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

Rock Mulch Borrow Source
The rock mulch cover layer will consist of 30 % AASHTO No. 1 gravel, and 70% pediment soil.
A rock source was identified on the Shootaring property at the location shown on Figure 4-17.
Much of the rock mulch will be excavated in constructing the diversion channel within the east
grading area shown on Figure 4-4. The proposed rock source is from the Entrada Sandstone
Formation which is located at the existing ground surface across much of the Facility. Based on
the original geologic mapping completed by Woodward Clyde (1978) and the information
presented in Hydro-Engineering (2005b), the Entrada Formation has an approximate thickness of
420 feet.

The rock source, shown on Figure 4-17, was tested by Plateau Resources, Ltd and
Hydro-Engineering (2005b). The rock durability testing results were presented in their report. The
results of this testing are provided in Appendix B.1. The Los Angeles (LA) Abrasion testing
showed that the onsite sandstone has an approximate loss of 5.1% to 7.8%. The rock durability
scoring from Hydro-Engineering (2005b) is also presented in Appendix B.1.

According to NUREG-1623 Section 7.2.2, non-critical areas with a durability score ranging from
50% to 80% require oversizing. Hydro-Engineering (2005b) stated that the rock present in the
quarry site was approximately 36% andesite porphyry and 74% sandstone with a composite
durability score of 63.3%. The oversize factor is 80% minus the durability rating
(Hydro-Engineering, 2005b). This results in an increase in rock diameter of approximately 16.7%.

Additionally in 2002, Hydro-Engineering had a petrographic analysis performed (Paster, 2002).
The results of the petrographic analysis are included in Appendix B.2 of this report. The
petrographic analysis was conducted on samples of sandstone and andesite porphyry collected
from the rock borrow area on the Shootaring property. NUREG-1623 provides guidelines for the
use of sandstone, these are listed below.

1. “The Sandstones should be fine-grained cemented with quartz. (Carbonate mineralized
sandstones may be present, but climate should be such that the predominant dry weather
results in high evaporation rates and limited rock saturation. Climatic conditions should
also result in high pH, which should not affect the rock calcite mineralization.”
2. Low rock porosity.
3. Vertical or horizontal joints and fractures should be insignificant.
4. Sandstone should come from massive bedding formations.

Petrographic analysis shows the cement was 7% composed of goethite, carbonate, and clay. The
pore space was approximately 17%. Additionally, there were no fractures present in the samples.
The analysis stated that, “Joints/fractures comprised some surface of the particles and these are
estimated to be greater than 2” spacing” (Paster, 2002). The petrographic analysis and
massive-bedded nature of the Entrada sandstone indicate that the sandstone present at the
Shootaring Facility meets the NUREG-1623 guidelines.

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 22 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

Borrow Source Quantities
EA determined the required volumes of borrow source for each material type. A summary of the
required volumes is presented in Table 4-11. The proposed borrow contours for the clay source
are presented on Figure 4-18. EA determined that the clay borrow source location contains at least
312,600 cubic yards of material available for the radon barrier. This is more than four times the
calculated 65,000 cubic yards of clay needed for the radon barrier.

The Facility contains potential borrow sources for pediment, rock, and sand. The pediment and
sand borrow areas are approximately 1.4 million square feet each. The area multiplied by the
approximate depth of 17 feet for the sand and 30 feet for the pediment results in approximately
885,100 and 1,593,111 cubic yards of pediment and sand, respectively. The Facility borrow
sources are shown on Figure 4-17. It is calculated that approximately 274,300 and 240,200 cubic
yards of pediment and sand, respectively, are required for reclamation. 270,000 cubic yards of rock
is required to complete the reclamation, which consists of 20,500 cubic yards of rock mulch for
the final cover and 9,700 cubic yards of rock fill for the tailings regrading. Additionally, 18,800
cubic yards of rock are required for the diversion channel riprap and bedding, 52,000 cubic yards
of rock is required for the north area grading, and 169,000 cubic yards of rock is required for the
South Dam slope grading. Approximately, 314,000 cubic yards of rock will be excavated within
the east grading area and north channel as part of the diversion channel construction, which is more
than the 270,000 cubic yards of rock required.

In total, between the clay borrow source and the onsite borrow locations for sand, pediment, and
rock, the required material for closure is available. A summary of the approximate volumes of
borrow source materials is included in Table 4-11.

Revegetation of Disturbed Areas
Seedbed Preparation
Soil organic matter serves as a reservoir of nutrients for vegetation, provides soil aggregation
(providing structure), increases nutrient exchange, retains moisture, reduces compaction, reduces
surface crusting, and increases water infiltration into soil. Organic matter increases the water
holding capacity as it alters particle aggregation and pore size distribution. Water holding capacity
of soil materials is an important consideration for land reclamation. Suitable soil water content is
essential for seed germination, seedling establishment, and plant survival as desiccation is a major
risk on disturbed sites, especially in arid environments.

Compost is a mixture of organic residues (manure or biosolids or green waste, straw, etc.) that
have been piled, mixed and moistened to undergo thermophilic decomposition. Enough compost
amendment should be incorporated to the project soils to add 1% organic matter to the top 3 inches
of soil. Compost shall be applied at a rate of 8 cubic yards per acre, spread evenly with an
agricultural spreader and incorporated to a depth of 3 inches using a disc or harrow implement.
Compost can be derived from livestock manure, biosolids, or green waste sources. Suitable
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 23 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

material will have at least 25% organic matter, pH not to exceed 8.5, soluble salts less than 10
mmhos/cm, and carbon to nitrogen ratio between 10:1 and 20:1.

Seeding
The proposed seed mix is comprised of all native species and application rates are presented in
Table 4-12 and is optimized for site edaphic and climatic conditions. Each included species was
evaluated for the following factors:

• Species Range
• Adapted to Project Soils
• Performance on Local Revegetation
• Species Dominance in Local Ecological Communities
• Precipitation Zones

These factors were also considered when recommending the application rate, which was
determined by seeds per square foot. Seeding can be accomplished using either broadcasting and
drilling techniques (as recommended on the seed mix), following final contouring and compost
application/incorporation. An effort will be made to implement seeding at optimal times for site
conditions (late fall/early spring). However, if a unit must be seeded during inopportune months,
a field level risk assessment will determine whether temporary erosion control measures (such as
crimped hay, wood shreds, wattles, etc.) are needed to stabilize the surface prior to anticipated
vegetation establishment. Drill seeding techniques cannot be used on extremely rough surfaces
(such as areas that have been contour furrowed with deep ripping equipment, or in rocky areas). If
the seed is broadcast, a light disc harrowing perpendicular to the flow of energy (wind and/or
water) should immediately follow seeding to increase seed to soil contact and provide some
protection from wind or water erosion and granivore. The recommended seed mix contains grasses
and shrubs with additional plant species to promote biodiversity. The application rate proposed in
Table 4-12 is 11.75 pounds/acre.

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 24 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

MILL DECOMMISSIONING AND SITE CLEANUP
A significant component of the reclamation and decommissioning of the Shootaring Canyon
Uranium Facility will be decommissioning and cleanup of the mill site. EA reviewed the previous
mill decommissioning plan prepared by Plateau Resources (Hydro-Engineering, 2005b). This
previous mill decommissioning plan is included in Appendix J. This section of the Reclamation
and Decommissioning Plan provides a summary of the activities for the mill decommissioning
plan.

Decommissioning Objectives
The project goals for mill decommissioning are outlined below:

1. Attain an as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) dose outcome for:
a. workers doing the decommissioning;
b. other onsite personnel; and
c. offsite individuals.
2. Optimize the effectiveness of the mill decommissioning plan.

The implementation strategy to achieve the goals for mill decommissioning is listed below:

1. Utilize commercially available demolition equipment to minimize exposures by
minimizing time and keeping personnel from close proximity to actual demolition
activities.
2. Plan the components.
3. Establish a work system.
4. Train the work force.
5. Execute the plan.
6. Monitor execution of the plan through project oversight and quality assurance.
7. Modify and continuously improve the plan.

Decommissioning Strategy
The decommissioning strategy for the remaining milling facility consists of the following major
elements:

1. Documentation of health and safety procedures.
2. Conducting pre-decommissioning activities.
3. Demolition of the above-ground facilities (removal of equipment and dismantling of
structures).
4. Demolition of below-ground facilities (floor slabs, foundations, and underground
utilities).
5. Mill site area soils cleanup.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 25 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

6. Material disposal in the south cell of the tailings impoundment.
7. Regrading and revegetation.

Although different types of equipment will be used to demolish each type of structure or
equipment, dismantling will proceed in four general stages. The first stage consists of demolition
of above-ground structures such as piping and tanks, then buildings and enclosed structures. The
second stage consists of concrete removal (floor slabs and foundations). The third stage consists
of removal of underground utilities. The fourth stage is excavation and removal of contaminated
soils.

The mill decommissioning plan describes these elements of removal as well as the requirements
prior to demolition and the procedures to be used for specific sections or areas of the mill facilities.
These elements are summarized in subsequent sections.

As discussed in Appendix J.1, decommissioning of the Facility includes decontamination of
salvageable equipment for unrestricted release. The text in the body of this Reclamation and
Decommissioning Plan has been updated from the equipment list presented in Appendix J to reflect
the proposed mill. Equipment and structures having no net salvageable value will be removed and
placed in the tailings cell. Contaminated soils and contaminated residues will be consolidated with
the tailings and stabilized within the TSF. Disturbed areas will then be graded and seeded for
growth of native vegetation. The planned Facility consists of the following infrastructure:

• Main Office Building
• Truck Scales
• Truck Wash
• Maintenance Shop
• Ore Storage Area
• Bucking Room
• Warehouse
• Grizzly - Dump Pocket
• Acid Tank
• Environmental Lab
• Fuel Oil Tank
• Diesel Storage Tank
• Potable Water Tank
• Analytical Lab - Stacks
• Raw Water Tank
• Wet Scrubber - Stack
• Reagent Storage
• Conveyor - Tunnel
• Seal Water Tank
• Generator Buildings - Stacks
• Pump House
• De-Mister Stack
• Sulfuric Acid Storage Tank
• Sodium Chlorate Tank
• Ammonia Tanks
• Vanadium Circuit Building
• Grinding Leach Area
• Counter Current Decantation Area
• Precipitation - Drying - Packaging
Area - Stack
• Water Management Pond
• Water Well #1 and Associated
Facilities
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 26 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

Water Management Pond and Water Well #1
This decommissioning plan includes minor equipment and structures updates from the 2002
Plateau Resources plan. These updates include disposal of the water management pond and
decommissioning of Water Well #1. The water management pond and Water Well #1 are located
to the South of the restricted area. It is outside the fence that enclosed the restricted area. This pond
was put in before the mill was built. The purpose of the pond was for dust control during the
building process and later for the roads. Pipes run from the pond down into the tailings area, ending
at a truck fill station between the tailings dams. Another fill station is attached to a float and is
approximately 20 feet from the pond on the west side. Water Well #1 is dedicated to this pond.
The infrastructure consists of one 110k gallon steel tank, a pump house, 2-wells (~1300' and
~900'), 1- lined pond (needs work), fill station, underground piping, which are located outside the
restricted area. Additionally, one 250k gallon raw water steel tank and an accompanying 10k water
treatment steel tank, chlorine treatment building, and underground piping are located inside the
restricted area (RDE, 2023).

Ticaboo Debris Stockpile
Currently, there is a metal pile of debris in the center of the yard at the mill site. This debris was
moved to the mill from the town of Ticaboo when Uranium One owned the mill. The debris
consists of generator building and generator materials. This material is understood to consist of
non-11e.(2) byproduct material. It is assumed that the debris pile consists of 1,100 cubic yards of
material and that 50% of that material is non-11e.(2) and can be free released to an unrestricted
area and disposed of (RDE, 2023). EA understands that Anfields has committed to disposal of the
debris stockpile material that can be free-released, therefore this material is not included in the
mill decommissioning plan.

Plans for soil removal and decontamination or demolition of the structures described by Plateau
Resources (2002) are presented in Appendix J.1.

Regulatory Requirements
All decommissioning activities will be done in accordance with the applicable requirements in
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the current license, and other applicable regulatory
requirements. The work will be done as soon as practical in conformance with 10CFR 40.42(g)
and Utah Admin. Rule R313-24. Other requirements include adherence to special engineering and
administrative controls, and standard management controls that will govern the decommissioning
activities. Record keeping will be conducted in accordance with 10 CFR 40.36(f) and relevant
requirements in the Utah Admin. Rule R313-24. Further discussion of the regulatory requirements
for decommissioning are presented in Appendix J.1. A list of Standard Operating Procedures that
will be followed during site reclamation and decommissioning is presented in Appendix J.6.

Health and Safety Procedures
The health and safety procedures to be established prior to decommissioning will be consistent
with Anfield Resources Holding Corp. (Anfield) standard operating procedures (SOPs) and are
listed below.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 27 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

1. General safety and hazard communications
2. Personal protection requirements
3. Occupational monitoring requirements
4. Environmental monitoring requirements
5. Administrative action levels
6. Medical emergency procedures
7. Fire protection
8. Water and contaminant management
9. Decontamination procedures for salvageable equipment
10. Operational issues
11. Quality assurance provisions
12. Project management, modification and improvement
13. Demolition worker training

This information will be documented in a health and safety plan and SOPs for decommissioning
the Facility.

Pre-Demolition Activities
Pre-decommissioning activities consist of preparing the milling facility area for demolition. These
activities include removal of remaining process fluids, residual residues, reagents, products, and
other materials (where feasible) in order to reduce potential personnel exposure and environmental
exposure and facilitate demolition. Following this procedure, salvageable material will be
decontaminated for unrestricted use according to (Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site
Investigation Manual) MARSSIM criteria using the Data Quality Objectives (DQOs) established
in the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) presented in the Tetra Tech Design Report (Tetra
Tech, 2008b). Buildings will be monitored and released according to the monitoring procedures
and release criteria presented in Appendices J.4 and J.5.

Following removal of process chemicals and salvageable equipment as described above, several
hazardous materials and safety surveys will be conducted to allow Anfield and its selected
demolition contractor to determine the sequence of dismantling, type of equipment required,
experience of personnel required, and type of protective equipment required. Special Work Permits
will be generated for each specific task, outlining the necessary controls and procedures prior to
commencement of work. Pre-demolition surveys will be conducted in five specific areas: (1)
radiological, (2) hazardous materials, (3) asbestos, (4) other materials requiring special handling,
and (5) worker safety.

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 28 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

Disassemble and Dispose of Contaminated Equipment and Structural Materials
All materials and plant equipment unsuitable for unrestricted release will be placed in the tailings
impoundment for disposal. This includes contaminated residues from tanks or vessels identified
for decontamination to release criteria levels. As presented in the previous decommissioning plan
in Appendix J.1, a list of equipment was prepared that is anticipated for disposal into the tailings
cell. Table 5-1 lists the equipment anticipated for disposal into the tailings facility that will not be
contaminated.

Decontamination of Tools, Equipment and Buildings for Unconditional Use
All tools, equipment, and structures considered for unrestricted release will be decontaminated
prior to monitoring. This includes all building surfaces classified as MARSSIM Class 1 and Class
2 (as defined in Appendix J.5). Decontamination methods include a combination of washing, high
pressure sprays, or steam cleaning. No hazardous waste constituents will be used in the
decontamination process. The surfaces will be air dried prior to radiological monitoring.

Table 5-2 is a list of equipment and buildings that are anticipated to be cleaned and released. Any
of the equipment and buildings on this list may be moved to the disposal list if cleanup efforts are
not effective or the cost of cleanup exceeds the salvage value.

Release criteria have been developed for building surfaces following NRC Regulations in 10
CFR 40, Appendix A and 10 CFR 20 and related sections of Utah Admin. Rule R313-24. The
code, RESRAD-Build, was used to calculate the total effective dose equivalent (TEDE) to future
occupants of the buildings when exposed to surface contamination from yellowcake and process
liquids. It was assumed that the buildings will be used for industrial purposes and that workers
occupying the buildings are the critical group. Appendix J.4 presents the results of the TEDE
modeling where a gross alpha contamination limit of 700 disintegrations per minute (dpm)/100
cm2 is proposed. This limit conforms to the 10 CFR 20 TEDE limit of 25 mrem/year. The State
of Utah requires the use of the Benchmark Approach for uranium recovery facilities, where the
TEDE was calculated in Appendix E to be 34 mrem/year. This would have allowed
approximately 950 dpm total alpha contamination levels. Because of ALARA considerations,
the 700 dpm/100 cm2 limit will be used.

Demolition of Above-Ground Facilities
This task consists of removal of process and other equipment from the mill buildings and
dismantling of above-ground portions of structures. All materials and plant equipment from
demolition unsuitable for unrestricted release will be transported to the South Cell for disposal in
a size and shape compatible with the transport equipment and disposal methods. This includes
contaminated residues from tanks or vessels identified for decontamination to release criteria
levels.

The strategy for demolition is based on current equipment and procedures for structural demolition
and which have been used successfully at other uranium mill sites in the western United States.
This strategy consists of the use of mechanized equipment specially designed for demolition work,
thus minimizing manual labor.

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 29 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

Demolition of the existing mill will utilize heavy equipment. This equipment will allow largely
remote demolition of structures and buildings and loading of debris. Modern demolition equipment
will allow remote-controlled water sprays to be directed as necessary, will require fewer staff, and
will reduce occupational exposures. Best management practices for dust control will be
implemented for worker safety and to minimize the generation and release of fugitive dust.

Demolition of Below-Ground Facilities
The below-ground facilities to be removed include concrete floor slabs, foundations, and buried
utilities. The utilities may include water, electric, gas, and drain lines. These materials will be
excavated and transported to the South Cell for disposal. Best management practices for dust
control will be implemented for worker safety and to minimize the generation and release of
fugitive dust.

Soils Cleanup
Following demolition and disposal of the mill buildings, appurtenant structures, and utilities,
remediation of contaminated soils will be done by excavation. The purpose of remedial action
support surveys (excavation control monitoring) is to guide the removal of contaminated material
to the point where it is highly probable that an area meets the cleanup criteria. Monitoring
equipment and action levels developed in the calibration studies will be used for excavation control
monitoring. A technician will monitor the soil after the removal of layers of soil until the
instrumentation shows that the levels are below the action level.

Gamma surveys will be used to guide the soil remediation efforts. The surveys will identify soil
contamination that exceeds the cleanup criteria and will be used to guide the cleanup efforts. After
cleanup, the surveys will be used, in conjunction with surface soil sample analyses, to verify
cleanup to the site cleanup criteria. The cleanup criteria for tailings is given in 10 CFR 40,
Appendix A, Criterion 6(6) and referenced in Utah Admin. Rule R313-24. The criteria require the
cleanup of Ra-226 to 5 picoCuries per gram (pCi/g) above background, averaged over the surface
15-cm depth layer and an area of 100 meters. The limit for subsurface layers is 15 pCi/g above
background averaged of the same area.

A final status survey (FSS) of the Facility, consisting of gamma surveys and soil sampling, and
potentially third-party verification by the State will be performed to verify that cleanup criteria
have been met across the Facility. Specific details of the soil cleanup plan including excavation,
remedial and verification radioactivity surveys, analytical verification soil sampling, and
contaminated material disposal are included in the Mill Decommissioning Plan (Appendix J).

Material Placement
Equipment and structures having no net salvageable value will be transported to the South Cell for
permanent disposal. Dismantled equipment and structural materials will be placed in the South
Cell for disposal according to the procedures listed below:

1. Material will be cut or dismantled into pieces that can be safely lifted or carried with
the equipment being used. Material will also be cut or dismantled to minimize void
spaces after disposal.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 30 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

2. A backhoe, front-end loader, crawler or equivalent equipment will be utilized to crush
or compact compressible materials. These materials will be laid out in a staging area or
other approved area to facilitate crushing or compacting with equipment.
3. Pipe or conduit with an opening or diameter larger than 12 inches that cannot be
crushed will be filled with earthen materials prior to disposal.
4. Tanks will be crushed or compacted if possible. Wooden vats will be dismantled. Tanks
or vessels that cannot be crushed will be dismantled, if feasible. Tanks that cannot be
crushed or dismantled will be transported to the South Cell, filled with earthen
materials, and buried.
5. Mill debris placement will be a minimum distance of 10 feet from the TSF liner.

Contaminated Facility soils will be placed in the South Cell with the disposed equipment and
structural materials, based on the objectives outlined below:

1. The fill is used to create a working surface above the disposed materials to allow
construction equipment to travel over and compact the disposed materials, and to
protect rubber-tired equipment from punctures.
2. The fill provides an interim cover over the disposed material to minimize exposure of
mill materials to air and meteoric water.
3. The fill is used to minimize void spaces within the disposed materials and preclude
future settlement. The lifts of fill and disposed material will be compacted by multiple
passes with heavy equipment.
Best management practices for dust control will be implemented for worker safety and to minimize
the generation and release of fugitive dust.

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 31 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

WATER RESOURCE PROTECTION
The tailings management plan for the Facility has been developed to prevent contamination of
groundwater underlying the TSF. A multilayered liner system with a leachate collection system
and leak detection system with a clay basal liner will be used for containment and collection of the
mill tailings solution in the TSF. This system of multiple liners, with the associated operation and
monitoring programs and engineered geotechnical, hydrologic, and hydraulic characteristics of
each liner, encompasses the primary groundwater protection system for the TSF.

A groundwater monitoring network serves as the secondary groundwater protection system. The
objective of the groundwater monitoring system is to provide prompt detection of potential
changes in groundwater quality which could be indicative of a failure of the primary groundwater
protection system. The design of the groundwater monitoring system is based on data collected
from previous investigations (Hydro-Engineering 1998, 2006) and the results of groundwater
modeling (AquiferTek, 2017). The results of this groundwater monitoring system will be used to
evaluate compliance with State groundwater protection.

Results of the infiltration analysis (Section 4.6) indicate a long-term mean annual percolation value
through the cover system of 0.45 inches/year. Essentially, if all the water that could potentially
percolate through the TSF cover were to reach the Entrada aquifer, the groundwater flow system
(with respect to flow direction and velocity) would be relatively unchanged from its current
configuration.

Groundwater modeling (AquiferTek, 2017) was conducted using a range of site-specific and
reasonable hydrologic parameter values to evaluate the potential distribution and flow paths of
hypothetical future water discharge from the base of the TSF. The results of the stochastic
modeling simulations indicated that a monitor well network with wells spaced approximately 400
feet apart, along the perimeter of the TSF, would detect groundwater contamination sourced from
the TSF. The wells will be screened across the upper 100 feet of the water table aquifer, based on
the results of the groundwater modeling that indicate the highest concentration of a potential
contaminant would be within that portion of the aquifer. Figure 6-1 shows the proposed closure
groundwater monitoring network system. Groundwater monitoring would be performed in
accordance with the Shootaring Canyon Uranium Mill Compliance Monitoring Plan (Anfield,
2018a) and the Groundwater Sampling and Analysis Plan (Anfield, 2018b).

Some wells from the operational period environmental monitoring network may be incorporated
into the final TSF groundwater monitoring network, as appropriate and as approved by the State
of Utah. Monitoring of the shallow, discontinuous perched unit within the Upper Entrada will not
require monitoring because the unit does not extend beyond the limits of the TSF.

As previously indicated, groundwater velocity within the Entrada Sandstone aquifer is relatively
low (at less than 10 feet per year). If a future release from the TSF is detected, the slow movement
of groundwater would allow adequate time to investigate and mitigate the release, if necessary.

The combination of the primary and secondary groundwater protection systems for the TSF
provides adequate protection of the groundwater resources.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 32 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

ADDITIONAL PLANS AND MONITORING PROGRAMS
Additional Plans
A Tailings Dewatering Plan, Settlement Monitoring Plan, and Groundwater Monitoring Plan will
be prepared for the TSF prior to closure. The plans will be submitted to the DRC at least one year
prior to decommissioning of the site.

Settlement Monitoring Plan
Monitoring of tailings surface settlement will be conducted at the end of operations to measure
rates and locations of settlement prior to construction of the cover system. Settlement monitoring
plates will be placed on top of the tailing interim cover at 300 feet spacing in the x and y direction.
After construction of the final cover system, settlement monitoring will be conducted as part of
post-closure performance monitoring. Settlement monitoring monuments will be placed at 300
feet spacing in the x and y direction on the final cover. The monitoring monuments will consist
of a concrete benchmark that will extend through the rock mulch to the top of the biointrusion and
frost protection layer. The concrete benchmarks shall be set to a depth of at least 36 inches. The
surface of the monuments shall be approximately 6 inches by 6 inches and level with the surface
of the cover and should have a rebar set in the center of the concrete to act as the measuring point.
The survey of the final cover system will be completed quarterly for the first two years after
placement of the final cover. After year two, the survey frequency will be decreased annually until
90% of predicted post-cover placement consolidation has been obtained. The pre-final cover
placement settlement survey results will be provided to Utah Department of Environmental
Quality for review at least one year prior to decommissioning of the Facility. Post-final cover
placement settlement survey results will be provided to Utah Department of Environmental
Quality annually for review until 90% of predicted post-cover placement consolidation has been
obtained or until license termination, whichever period ever is shorter.

Closure and Post-Closure Monitoring
Closure Monitoring
Closure monitoring requirements will be the same as for cessation of operations and will include
operational, health physics, and environmental monitoring.

Operational monitoring will include inspections of tailings and waste retention systems and
fugitive dust control. Inspections of the tailings and waste retention systems will be the same as
during operations except that daily inspections will be performed monthly. Monthly inspections
will include inspections of diversion channels, embankments, tailings impoundment, and leachate
and leak detection systems for the TSF. Quarterly inspections will include inspections of the South
Dam, all instrumentation, and operational facilities and features. Quarterly inspections will also
include evaluation of any surveying of settlement monuments and piezometers.

Health physics monitoring for reclamation and decommissioning will include the following:

• Radionuclide Air Monitoring
• Radon Progeny Sampling
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 33 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

• Inspection of Mill and Related Process Features
• Urinalysis Bioassay
• Instrument Calibrations
• Inspection of Respirators
• Audits and Trend Analysis
• Restricted Area Fence and Sign Inspection
• Monitoring Cleanup of Contaminated Surface Soils
• Monitoring Cleanup of Contaminated Subsurface Soils
• Soil Screening Method for Thorium-230 in Soil

Additional detail including sample locations and testing frequency for health physics monitoring
during closure will need to be provided in the Shootaring Canyon Uranium Mill Compliance
Monitoring Plan (Anfield, 2018a) and the Groundwater Sampling and Analysis Plan (Anfield,
2018b).

Environmental monitoring will include the following:

• High-Volume Air Sampler Calibration
• Meteorology Calibration
• Air Stack Particulates

Results of inspections and monitoring will be included in annual monitoring reports. Additional
detail including sample locations and testing frequency for monitoring during closure will need to
be provided in a Compliance Monitoring Plan. Details on inspection and monitoring procedures
are provided in SOPs and summarized in the Compliance Monitoring Plan (Anfield, 2018a).

Post-Closure Monitoring
Post-closure monitoring will include quarterly monitoring of the final cover for the first two years
after cover placement and annually thereafter and annual reporting. Monitoring of the final cover
will be documented in a field book or equivalent and will include visual inspection of the cover
surface for evidence of settlement, ponding of water, erosion and any other observations.
Settlement survey of the final cover will be completed annually until 90% of predicted
consolidation has been obtained or until license termination, whichever period ever is shorter.
Final cover monitoring results will be documented in an annual monitoring report along with the
groundwater monitoring. Closure groundwater monitoring information is discussed in Section 6
of this Plan and will be reported annually until license termination.

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 34 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

RECLAMATION AND DECOMMISSIONING SCHEDULE
The phasing of the reclamation and decommissioning for the Facility is as follows:

Phase I – Reclamation and Decommissioning – Interim Cover
This phase consists of mill decommissioning, tailings regrading, placement of an interim
cover on the regraded tailings surface, reclamation of the South Dam to a 5H:1V slope,
construction of the reclamation diversion channel, monitoring, and preparation of an
environmental report and a reclamation and decommissioning report. The duration of this
phase is estimated as 20 months with mill decommissioning occurring at the start of the
time period. The mill decommissioning is estimated to take 14 months.

Phase II – Reclamation and Decommissioning – Final Cover
This phase consists of placement of a final cover on the TSF after tailings consolidation is
complete. Monitoring will continue for the duration of this phase. An as-built report and
final environmental report will be completed at the end of the final cover construction. The
duration of this phase is estimated as 18 months with construction lasting a maximum of
15 months. Construction Completion Reports documenting the as-built conditions and the
construction QA/QC data will be prepared after construction is completed and submitted
to the State of Utah.

Phase III– Post-Closure Monitoring
Post-closure monitoring will include groundwater and cover monitoring. Annual
monitoring reports will continue for the duration of post-closure monitoring. The estimated
time period for post-closure monitoring is 48 months.

Radiation safety and monitoring programs shall continue throughout the decommissioning and
tailings reclamation process. Weather delays could result in a longer period of time between the
start and finish of the reclamation. Additionally, laboratory and completion reports with regulatory
review and approval could also require additional time between some reclamation tasks. A
breakdown of the proposed reclamation and decommissioning schedule is presented on Figure 8-1.
Task durations presented in the schedule are summarized in Table 8-1.

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 35 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

RECLAMATION AND DECOMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATE
A conceptual cost estimate was completed for the reclamation and decommissioning of the
Facility. The summary of costs is provided in Table 9-1. A more detailed cost estimate is provided
in Appendix K. The total reclamation cost for the mill and tailings impoundment is estimated to
be $25,398,929, which includes construction costs for mill decommissioning and demolition,
borrow excavation, site regrading, and interim and final cover construction for the tailings
impoundment. Other costs include management costs, engineering costs, profit allowance,
contingency costs, licensing and bonding costs, and long-term care fund costs.

Quantities are based on the current conceptual design and current mill layout. Equipment costs,
unit costs, and production rates are based on RSMeans 2024 data (RSMeans, 2023) and past
experience at similar uranium mill and tailings impoundment sites. Labor rates were based on the
most recent Bureau of Labor Statistics rates.

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 36 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

REFERENCES
Advanced Terra Testing. (2008) Laboratory Results For Tetra Tech, Shootaring Canyon.
August 1.
Aldrich, H.P. and Paynter, H.M. (1953). Analytical studies of freezing and thawing of soils.
First interim report, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England Division, Arctic
Construction and Frost Effects Laboratory (ACFEL). Technical Report 42.
Anfield Resources Holding Corp. (2018a). Shootaring Canyon Uranium Mill Compliance
Monitoring Plan, September.
Anfield Resources Holding Corp. (2018b). Shootaring Canyon Mill Groundwater Monitoring
Sampling and Analysis Plan, September
AquiferTek. (2017). Groundwater Compliance Monitoring System Design, Shootaring Canyon
Mill Tailings Disposal Facility. Prepared for Anfield Resources, Inc. May 19.
Berggren, W.P., (1943). Prediction of Temperature Distribution in Frozen soils. Trans. Am.
Geophys. Union.
Cedar Creek Associates Inc. (2023). Biointrusion Assessment for Shootaring Canyon Uranium
Facility Cover. September 22.
Caldwell, T.G., Tabatabai, S., Huntington, J.M., Davies, G.E., & Fuhrmann, M. (2022).
Evapotranspiration Covers at Uranium Mill Tailings Sites. Vadose Zone Journal, 21,
e2022.
DBS&A Soil Testing& Research Laboratory. (2023). Laboratory Report Shootaring Closure
Design. June 16.
U.S. Departments of Army and Air Force. (1988). Arctic and Subarctic Construction
Calculation Methods for Determination of Depths of Freeze and Thaw in Soils, First
Interim Report. Army TM 5-852-6, Air Force AFR 88-19, Vol. 6.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2018). 40 CFR Part 192 Subpart D.
Geo-Slope International, Ltd. (GEO-SLOPE). (2021). GeoStudio-SLOPE/W. Calgary, Alberta,
Canada.
Geo-Slope International, Ltd. (GEO-SLOPE). (2023). GeoStudio-SEEP/W. Calgary, Alberta,
Canada.
Hydro-Engineering, LLC. (1998). Ground-Water Hydrology of Shootaring Canyon Tailings
Site. Prepared for Plateau Resources Limited.
Hydro-Engineering, LLC. (1999). Aquifer Properties of New Wells and Recommended
Sampling Rates. Prepared for Plateau Resources Limited.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 37 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

Hydro-Engineering, LLC. (2000). Update of the Ground-Water Hydrology of Shootaring
Canyon Tailings Site. Prepared for Plateau Resources Limited
Hydro-Engineering, LLC. (2001). Ground-Water Monitoring of Shootaring Canyon Tailings
Site, 2000. Prepared for Plateau Resources Limited
Hydro-Engineering, LLC. (2002). Ground-Water Monitoring of Shootaring Canyon Tailings
Site, 2001. Prepared for Plateau Resources Limited.
Hydro-Engineering, LLC. (2005a). Tailings Management Plan for Shootaring Canyon
Uranium Processing Facility. Amended December 2005. Revised April 2007.
Hydro-Engineering, LLC. (2005b). Tailings Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan for
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Project Garfield County, Utah. December 2005. Revised
December 2006.
Hydro-Engineering, LLC. (2005c). Ground-Water Hydrology of Shootaring Canyon Tailings
Site, 2005. Prepared for Plateau Resources Limited.
Hydro-Engineering, (2006). Ground-water Monitoring of Shootaring Canyon Tailings Site.
Prepared for Plateau Resources Limited.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2023). Climate Change 2023, Synthesis
Report for the Sixth Assessment Report on Climate Change. March.
Lambe, T.W. and R.V. Whitman. (1969). Soil Mechanics. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Lee, K.L. and C.K. Shen. (1969). Horizontal Movements related to Subsidence. Journal of Soil
Mechanics and Foundation Division, ASCE Volume 95. January.
Modified Berggren Formula (MBF). (1968). U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering
Laboratory, CRREL Special Report SR 122. October.
Morgenstern, N.R. and Price, V.E. (1965) The Analysis of The Stability of General Slip Surfaces.
Geotechnique, 15, 79-93.
Morrison-Knudsen Environmental Corporation. (1993). UMTRA-Naturita, Embankment
Design, Settlement Analysis and Cracking Potential Evaluation. Calc. No. 17-740-02-
01. May.
Nelson, R., Castellvi. F., Ndlovu L.S., Campell, G.S., & Stockle, C.O., (2023), ClimGen Version
4.4.0. Washington State University.
Nelson, J.D., Abt, S.R., Volpe, R.L., van Zyl, D., Hinkle, N.E., and Staub, W.P. (1986).
Methodologies for evaluating long-term stabilization designs of uranium mill tailings
impoundments. NUREG/CR-4620 ORNL/TM-10067.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 38 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

Paster, T.P. Ph.D. (2002). Petrographic Analyses of Andesite and Sandstone to be Used as Erosion
Protection for a Reclaimed Uranium Tailings Facility. August 19.
R and D Enterprises (RDE). (2023). Shootaring Canyon Mill Site Project Debris Pile and Water
System. December 4.RSMeans (2023). RSMeans 2024 Commercial New Construction
Cost Data. www.rsmeansonline.com. Accessed October 30, 2023.
Smith, G. E. and Rager, R. E. (2002). Protective Layer Design in Landfill Covers Based on
Frost Penetration. ASCE J. Geotechnical/Geoenvironmental Engineering, 128:9,
794-799.
T.L. Johnson (2002). Design of Erosion Protection for Long-Term Stabilization Final Report.
NUREG-1623.
Tetra Tech, Inc. (2007). Shootaring Canyon Mill Annual Ground Water Monitoring Report.
March 5.
Tetra Tech. (2008a). Shootaring Canyon Uranium Mill Tailings Facility Design Report. May
27.
Tetra Tech. (2008b). Final Draft Shootaring Canyon Uranium Mill Tailings Facility Design
Report. Revised December.
URS. (2007). Utah Division of Radiation Control, Uranium One, Inc., Shootaring Canyon
Uranium Processing Facility, Request to Resume Operations, Interrogatories – Round
2. August 24.
URS. (2008a). Utah Division of Radiation Control, Uranium One, Inc., Shootaring Canyon
Uranium Processing Facility, Request to Resume Operations, Interrogatories – Round
3. February.
URS. (2008b). Utah Division of Radiation Control, Uranium One, Inc., Shootaring Canyon
Uranium Processing Facility, Interrogatories – Round 4. August 28.
U.S. Department of Energy (U.S. DOE). (1989). Technical Approach Document, Revision II,
Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action Project, UMTRA-DOE/AL 050425.0002,
Albuquerque, New Mexico.
U.S. Department of Defense (U.S. DOD). (2022). Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) Soil
Mechanics (DM 7.1). UFS 3-220-10. February 1.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). (1989). Calculation of Radon Flux Attenuation
by Earthen Uranium Mill Tailings Covers, Regulatory Guide 3.64.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). (2002). NUREG-1623, Design of Erosion
protection for long term stabilization. August.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 39 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). (2003). NUREG-1620, Standard review plan for the
review of a reclamation plan for mill tailings sites under title II of the uranium mill tailings
radiation control act of 1978. June.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). (2008). Regulatory Guide 3.11, design construction
and inspection of embankment retention systems at uranium recovery facilities. November.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). (2011). Engineered Covers for Water Containment:
Changes in Engineering Properties and Implications for Long-Term Performance
Assessment. NUREG/CR-7028. December.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). (2013). 10 CFR Part 192 – Health and
Environmental protection standards for uranium and thorium mill tailings.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). (2020). 10 CFR Part 40 – Domestic licensing source
material, https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part040/. (Accessed 2023).
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). (2020). 10 CFR Appendix A to Part 40 – Criteria
Relating to the Operation of Uranium Mills and Disposition of Tailings or Wastes
Produced by the Extraction or Concentration of Source Material From Ores Processed
Primarily for Their Source Material Content, https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-
collections/cfr/part040/part040-appa.html. (Accessed 2023).
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). (1982). 10 CFR Part 61.56 – Waste Characteristics
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part061/full-text.html#part061-0056
(Accessed 2024).
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). (2021). Appendix A to Part 100—Seismic and
Geologic Siting Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants, https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-
collections/cfr/part100/part100-appa.html. (Accessed 2023).
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). (2022). Evaluation of In-Service Radon Barriers
over Uranium Mill Tailings Disposal Facilities. NUREG/CR-7288. March.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). (2023). 10 CFR 20 – Standards For Protection
Against Radiation, April 14.
Western Regional Climate Center (2023). Evaporation Stations.
https://wrcc.dri.edu/Climate/comp_table_show.php?stype=pan_evap_avg
Woodward-Clyde Consultants. (1978). Environmental Report, Shootaring Canyon Uranium
Project, Garfield County. Prepared for Plateau Resources Limited. Revised June 16,
1980.

TABLES

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan

March 2024 T-1 Engineering Analytics, Inc.
Table 4-1 Summary of Material Properties for Infiltration Analyses
Material Thickness
(in)
Initial
Water
Content
(%)
Dry Unit
Weight
(lb/ft3)
Ksat
(cm/s) Porosity
Rock Mulch (1) 12 11.1(2) 101.4 (2) 8.8×10-5 (2) 0.37 (2)
Pediment Layer
(Frost Protection and
Biointrusion)
42 11.1 (2) 101.4 (2) 8.8×10-5 (2) 0.37 (2)
Sand Layer
(Frost Protection and
Drainage)
12 10.8 (2) 97.4 (2) 3.3×10-5 (2) 0.41 (2)
Clay Layer (Radon
Barrier) 12 15.1 (3) 107.9 (3) 8.5×10-7 (3) 0.36 (3)
Interim Cover
(Sand) 18 10.8 (2) 97.4 (2) 3.3×10-5 (2) 0.41 (4)
Tailings 704
(58.7 ft) (5) 18.8 (4) 81.5 (4) 2×10-5 (6) 0.41 (4)
Liner System 4.6×10-10 (7)
60-mil HDPE
Geomembrane 0.06 - - 4.6×10-12 (8) -
HDPE Geonet - - - - -
60-mil HDPE
Geomembrane 0.06 - - 4.6×10-12 (8) -
Compacted Clay 12 13.9 (9) 107.9 (4) 1×10-7 (10) 0.36 (4)
Foundation Soil
(Entrada Sandstone) 600 4.2 (9) 115.4 (9) 3.3×10-5 (11) 0.25 (12)
Notes: (1) Rock mulch is 30% 2-inch minus and 70% pediment soils. Therefore, the pediment soil
properties control for modeling.
(2) obtained from EA 2023 testing of pediment and aeolian sand material.
(3) obtained from the test data for EA-TP4 (DBS&A, 2023).
(4) calculated using data obtained from the August 2008 Advanced Terra Testing report.
(5) approximate maximum thickness of the tailings from Tetra Tech Design Report (2008b).
(6) obtained from Appendix G.1 of Tetra Tech Design Report (2008b).
(7) calculated equivalent hydraulic conductivity value for the entire liner system.
(8) calculated using design parameters given in Appendix G of Tetra Tech Design Report
(2008b).
(9) obtained from Table 2-3 of the Tetra Tech Design Report (2008b).
(10) obtained from Section 7.2.1 of the Tetra Tech Design Report (2008b).
(11) obtained from Appendix C of the Tetra Tech Design Report (2008b).
(12) assumed typical values.

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan

March 2024 T-2 Engineering Analytics, Inc.
Table 4-2 Sources of Meteorological Data
Data Type Description Source Source Dates
Air
Temperature
Daily high and
low temperature
Hanksville, UT (primary),
Grand Junction, CO (alternate)
Page, AZ (alternate)
1973-2023 (Hanksville),
1973-2023 (Grand Junction),
2006-2023 (Page)
Precipitation Total daily
precipitation
Hanksville, UT (primary),
Grand Junction, CO (alternate)
Page, AZ (alternate)
1973-2023 (Hanksville),
1973-2023 (Grand Junction),
2006-2023 (Page)
Relative
Humidity
Daily high and
low humidity
Hanksville, UT (primary),
Grand Junction, CO (alternate)
Page, AZ (alternate)
1973-2023 (Hanksville),
1973-2023 (Grand Junction),
2006-2023 (Page)
Wind Speed Average daily
wind speed
Hanksville, UT (primary),
Page, AZ (alternate)
1973-2023 (Hanksville),
2006-2023 (Page)

Table 4-3 Comparison of Average Historic and Synthetic Climate Data
Data Type
Annual
Daily
Average
Precip.
(in/day)
Annual
Daily
Average
Max.
Temp.
(oF)
Annual
Daily
Average
Min.
Temp.
(oF)
Annual
Daily
Average
Solar
Radiation
(MJ/m2)
Annual
Daily
Average
Max.
Relative
Humidity,
(%)
Annual
Daily
Average
Min.
Relative
Humidity,
(%)
Annual
Daily
Average
Wind
Speed
(ft/s)
Historical
Data
(1973-2023)
0.02 68.5 41.8 21.5 66.8 21.8 6.5
ClimGen
Synthetic
Data
(2024-3023)
0.02 68.7 41.8 21.5 65.9 21.3 6.9

Table 4-4 Summary of 1,000 Years of Synthetic Climate Data
Precipitation
(in/day)
Max.
Temperature
(oF)
Min.
Temperature
(oF)
Max.
Relative
Humidity,
(%)
Min.
Relative
Humidity,
(%)
Wind
Speed
(ft/s)
Maximum 2.30 114.62 75.02 100 71.8 48.42
Minimum 0 9.14 -25.24 22.4 4.9 0.33
Standard
Deviation 0.10 17.22 16.40 18.3 9.3 5.31
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan

March 2024 T-3 Engineering Analytics, Inc.
Table 4-5 Summary of Results of Water Balance Components
Water Balance Components Mean Annual Values
Cumulative Precipitation 6.08 in/yr
Cumulative Percolation 0.45 in/yr
Percolation / Precipitation Ratio 7.4%
Cumulative Evapotranspiration 56.81 in/yr
Cumulative Surface Runoff 2.06 in/yr

Table 4-6 Summary of Material Properties for Settlement Analyses
Material Type Dry Density
(lb/ft3)
Specific
Gravity
Initial Grav.
Water Content
(%)
Porosity
(%)
Initial Void
Ratio,
eo
Rock Mulch (1) 101.4 (2) 2.593 (2) 11.1 (2) 0.37 (2) 0.59 (2)
Pediment Layer (Frost
Protection and Biointrusion) 101.4 (2) 2.593 (2) 11.1 (2) 0.37 (2) 0.59 (2)
Sand Layer (Frost Protection
and Drainage) 97.4 (2) 2.631 (4) 10.8 (2) 0.41 (4) 0.69 (4)
Clay Layer (Radon Barrier) 107.9 (3) 2.5 (5) 15.1 (3) 0.36 (3) 0.56 (3)
Interim Cover (Sand) 97.4 (2) 2.631 (4) 10.8 (2) 0.41 (4) 0.69 (4)
Tailings 81.5 (4) 2.5 (5) 18.8 (4) 0.48 (4) 0.92 (4)
Notes: (1) Rock mulch is 30% 2-inch minus and 70% pediment soils. Therefore, the pediment soil
properties control for modeling.
(2) obtained from EA 2023 testing of pediment and aeolian sand material.
(3) obtained from the test data for EA-TP4 (DBS&A, 2023).
(4) calculated using data obtained from the August 2008 Advanced Terra Testing report.
(5) assumed typical values.

Table 4-7 Summary of Maximum Tensile Strain for Cross Sections H1 and H2
Cross Section Maximum Tensile Strain (%) Corresponding Horizontal Distance (in)
H1-H1΄ 0.00225 0.0170
H2-H2΄ 0.00221 0.0616

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan

March 2024 T-4 Engineering Analytics, Inc.
Table 4-8 Material Properties for Slope Stability Analyses
Material
Total Unit
Weight
(lb/ft3)
Cohesion
(lb/ft2)
Friction Angle
(degrees)
Rock Mulch(1) 130 0 35
Pediment Layer (Frost Protection and
Biointrusion)
112.6(2) 0 32(3)
Sand Layer (Frost Protection and Drainage) 107.9(2) 0 30(3)
Clay Layer (Radon Barrier) 124.2(4) 0 27(4)
Interim Cover (Sand) 107.9(2) 0 30(3)
Tailings 100(5) 0 10(6)
Clay Layer 122(3) 0 27(3)
Embankment Clay Core 122(3) 0 27(3)
Embankment Sand Filter 125(3) 0 30(3)
Clayey Sand & G ravel 131(3) 0 40(3)
Embankment Toe Drain Material 130(3) 0 35(3)
Foundation Soil (Entrada Sandstone) 140(7) 1,000 45(3)
Natural Sands 116(8) 0 32(9)
Compacted Sand Fill
(On-site sands and excavated
Entrada Sandstone)

125(3)

0

32(9)
Notes: (1) Rock mulch is 25% 2-inch minus and 75% pediment soils, therefore the pediment soil properties
control for modeling.
(2) Obtained from EA 2023 testing of pediment and aeolian sand material.
(3) Soil strength parameters from Hydro-Engineering (2005b).
(4) Obtained from the test data for EA-TP4 (DBS&A, 2023).
(5) Calculated using data obtained from the August 2008 Advanced Terra Testing report.
(6) Typical values for sand/slimes uranium tailings.
(7) Obtained from Table 2-3 of the Tetra Tech Design Report (2008b).
(8) In place density from Tt-TP 29 (Tetra Tech, 2008b).
(9) Conservative reduction of measured phi angle, 39 degrees, from direct shear tests on two
composite samples of windblown weathered sandstone, and weathered sandstone,
respectively (Tetra Tech, 2008b).

Table 4-9 Summary of Minimum Factors of Safety
Failure Type Loading Condition Factor of Safety
Circular Static 3.9
Pseudo-Static 2.1
Sliding Block Wedge Static 3.9
Pseudo-Static 2.1

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan

March 2024 T-5 Engineering Analytics, Inc.
Table 4-10 Reclamation Cut and Fill Quantities
Task/Location Material Cut
(yd3)
Fill
(yd3)
Net Cut / Fill
(yd3)
Tailings Regrading
(TSF)
Tailings (1) 44,700 80,400 35,700 Fill
Mill Debris 0 26,000 (2) 26,000 Fill
Rock (Extra Material for
Tailings Regrading) 0 9,700 (2) 9,700 Fill
Total 44,700 44,700 Balances
Interim Cover (TSF) Sand (Interim Cover) 0 97,000 97,000 Fill
Sand (Camber Adjustment) (3) 0 78,200 78,200 Fill
Final Cover (TSF)
Clay 0 65,000 65,000 Fill
Pediment 0 274,300 274,300 Fill
Sand (Final Cover) 0 65,000 65,000 Fill
Rock (Rock Mulch) 0 20,500 20,500 Fill
Diversion Channel
(East Area Grading) Rock (Rip Rap) (4) 0 18,800 18,800 Fill
East Area Grading (5) Rock (Borrow Area) 295,000 0 295,000 Cut
Pediment 36,000 0 36,000 Cut
North Area Grading
Existing Soils
(General Grading) (6) 120,700 191,800 71,100 Fill
Existing Soils
(Drainage Channel Cut) (7) 19,000 0 19,000 Cut
Rock
(General Grading) (8) 0 52,000 52,000 Fill
Total 141,500 141,500 Balances
South Dam Grading Rock (9) 0 169,000 169,000 Fill
Notes: (1) Tailings cut and fill quantities determined from tailings regrading to 1.0 percent slope after the end
of operations.
(2) Excess fill from tailings regrading consists of 26,000 yd3 of mill debris from mill demolition and 9,700
yd3 of rock from onsite rock borrow area.
(3) Includes additional sand to camber the interim cover surface by the amount of predicted final cover
settlement, prior to final cover placement.
(4) Includes rip rap needed for diversion channel within the east area.
(5) East area grading activities consist of removal of pediment and rock material needed to construct the
diversion channel.
(6) General grading activities in the north area includes removal of the north dike, east dike, cross valley
berm, north process pond, and south process pond.
(7) Includes excavation and grading of onsite soils associated with the drainage channel construction.
(8) Includes rock required as excess fill for general grading.
(9) Includes material required for grading the South Dam slope to 5:1.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan

March 2024 T-6 Engineering Analytics, Inc.
Table 4-11 Required Borrow Quantities and Sources
Location Borrow Source Quantities Required Cut
(yd3)
Available Volume
(yd3)
Onsite Pediment Borrow (1) Pediment 274,300 885,100
Onsite Sand Borrow (1) Sand 240,200 1,593,111
Onsite Rock Borrow Rock 270,000 314,000(2)
Clay Borrow Lease (3) Clay 65,000 312,600
Total 849,500 --
Note: 1) Sand and pediment borrow areas are shown on Figure 4-17
2) Rock borrow will be obtained from east grading area and north channel for drainage channel cut as
shown on Figure 4-4 and delineated on Figure 4-17
3) Clay borrow area is shown on Figure 4-18

Table 4-12 Proposed Seed Mix and Application Rates
Seed Mix Specifications / Recommendations
No. Common Name Scientific Nomenclature
PLS / lb. PLS
lbs/ac
PLS /
ft2
% of
Seeds in
Mix
Gr
a
s
s

Indian Ricegrass Achnatherum hymenoides 141,000 1.50 4.9 6.1%
Purple Threeawn Aristida purpurea 250,000 1.00 5.7 7.2%
Bottlebrush Squirreltail Elymus elymoides 192,000 0.50 2.2 2.8%
Galleta Hilaria jamesii (Pleuraphis
jamesii) 159,000 1.50 5.5 6.9%
Western Wheatgrass Pascopyrum smithii 110,000 1.50 3.8 4.7%
Sandberg Bluegrass Poa secunda ssp. sandbergii 1,047,000 0.25 6.0 7.5%
Bluebunch Wheatgrass Pseudoroegneria spicata ssp.
spicata 140,000 1.00 3.2 4.0%
Sand Dropseed Sporobolus cryptandrus 5,298,000 0.25 30.4 38.1%
Grass Subtotal 7.50 61.7 77.3%
Fo
r
b
s
Lewis Flax Linum lewisii 170,000 0.50 2.0 2.4%
Scarlet Globemallow Sphaeralcea coccinia 500,000 0.25 2.9 3.6%
Gooseberryleaf
Globemallow Sphaeralcea grossulariifolia 500,000 0.50 5.7 7.2%
Forb Subtotal 1.25 10.6 13.2%
Sh
r
u
b
s
Fourwing Saltbush Atriplex canescens 52,000 1.00 1.2 1.5%
Shadscale Saltbush Atriplex confertifolia 64,900 1.00 1.5 1.9%
Blackbrush Coleogyne ramosissima 22,400 0.50 0.3 0.3%
Rubber Rabbitbrush Ericameria nauseosa 400,000 0.50 4.6 5.8%
Shrub Subtotal 3.00 7.5 9.4%
Total 11.75 79.8
Alternates
Gr
a
s
s
e
s
Black Grama Bouteloua eriopoda 1,335,000
Blue Grama Bouteloua gracilis 724,000
Alkali Sacaton Sporobolus airoides 1,758,000

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan

March 2024 T-7 Engineering Analytics, Inc.
Table 5-1 List of Equipment/Buildings Anticipated for Disposal into Tailings Facility
Equipment Construction Material
Ore grizzly Steel
Wet Scrubber Steel
Sulfuric acid tank Steel
Leach feed tanks w agitator Rubber coated steel
Leach 1st stage w agitator Rubber coated steel
Leach 2nd stage w agitator Rubber coated steel
Primary thickener 1st stage Rubber coated steel
Clarifier thickener 2nd stage Rubber coated steel
Sand filters Steel
Counter current decantation concrete pad Concrete
Reagent mix tanks Steel
Yellow Cake Drum Roller Steel
Solvent extraction tanks, mixers mixers Fiberglass
Solvent extraction scrubber Fiberglass
Precipitation solution tank Fiberglass
Yellow Cake precipitation tanks Rubber coated steel
Yellow Cake thickener Rubber coated steel
Yellow Cake drum filters Steel
Yellow Cake calciner Masonry & steel
Yellow Cake impact crusher Steel
Yellow Cake Scrubber Steel
Tailings slurry line HDPE pipe
Dust/fume collector Steel, fiberglass
Pumps, piping, electric motors and other misc. Steel, rubber coated steel, fiberglass, copper

Misc. concrete and rebar Concrete, steel
Contaminated yard area Steel, fiberglass

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan

March 2024 T-8 Engineering Analytics, Inc.
Table 5-2 List of Equipment/Buildings Anticipated for Unrestricted Release
Equipment Size Construction Materials
Office building 25’x80’ Metal frame with metal siding, wood and gypsum board interior
Desks, file chairs
Guard Station Wood frame with wood siding and gypsum board
Scale Steel and wood
Truck Wash
Sample preparation building Steel
Ore Hopper Steel
Conveyor apron feed Steel
Conveyor structure Steel
Belt Rubber
Fresh water tanks –2 tanks Steel
Pump/fire house building 20’x 50’ Concrete, steel frame and steel siding
Temporary gensets
Powerhouse building 60’x 90’ Steel frame and steel siding
6-gensets complete
2-air compressors
Control panels
Dry (change rooms)
Diesel fuel storage tank Steel
Sulfuric Acid Storage Tank
Sodium Chlorate Storage Tank
Electric switchgear
Transformers
SAG mill
Controls
Screens
Vanadium circuit
Vanadium oxidation tanks, vanadium mixers and settlers,
vanadium precipitation tanks, vanadium belt filter, rotary kiln,
fusion furnace, water casting wheel, vanadium packaging system,
two venturi wet gas scrubbers, associated piping and pumping
Vanadium building
Mill control room
instrumentation
Mill office area Wood/sheet rock
Counter current decantation
tanks Rubber lined steel
Tailings Pumps Steel
Sodium chlorate tank Steel
Ammonia tanks Steel
Unloading pump
Kerosene tank Steel
Pumping system
Laboratory building 45’ x 85’ Metal frame with metal siding, wood and gypsum board interior
Lab equipment
Maintenance shop building 75’ x 120’ Steel frame and steel siding
Equipment
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan

March 2024 T-9 Engineering Analytics, Inc.
Table 5-2 List of Equipment/Buildings Anticipated for Unrestricted Release - Continued
Warehouse building 70’ x 75’ Metal frame with metal siding, wood and gypsum board interior
Main mill building Steel frame and steel siding
Solvent extraction 70’ x 100’
Precipitation 40’ x 70’
Reagent 40’ x 70’
Grinding and leach 70’ x 120’

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan

March 2024 T-10 Engineering Analytics, Inc.
Table 8-1 Summary of Reclamation and Decommissioning Schedule
Task Duration
Phase I - Interim Cover and Mill Decommissioning
Mill Decommissioning and Shaping 421
Salvage Of Mill Components 180
Gamma-Soil Radionuclide Relationship 4
Ammonia Tank Conversion 1
Truck Scale Cleanup and Building Demo 1
Ore Hopper Demo 10
Acid Tank & Foundation Demo 2
CCD Circuit Demo 12
Mill Demo 20
Vanadium Circuit Demo 7
Tanks And Foundations E. Of Mill Demo 3
Sodium Chlorate Tank, Found. Demo 2
Concrete Trench Demo 3
Tailings Conveyance System Demo 2
Removal Of Contaminated Soils from Around Buildings 3
Removal Of Contaminated Soils from Ore Pad Area 10
Radioactive Containment Storage Area Cleanup 5
Soil Verification 3
Recontouring, Shaping and Seeding Mill Site and Borrow 5
Management, Reporting, Testing & Monitoring 103
Mobilization and Demobilization 10
Tailings Regrading and Interim Cover Construction 333
Mill Site Demolition/Decontamination Materials 90
Sand Borrow Excavation 39
Rock Borrow Excavation 84
North Regrading 100
Drainage Channel Construction, North Grading 30
Drainage Channel Construction, South Grading 22
Tailings Cell Regrading 42
Interim Sand Cover Material 22
Reclamation and Decommissioning Report 80
Phase II - Final Cover
Final Cover Construction 445
Clay Borrow Excavation 31
Pediment Borrow Excavation 66
Additional Interim Sand for Camber Adjustment 18
Clay Cover Material 41
Final Sand Cover Material 15
Pediment Soil Cover Material 62
Rock Mulch Cover Placement 10
Rock Mulch and Riprap Production 26
Windblown Contamination & General Regrading 40
As-Built Report Preparation and Submittal 80
Phase III - Post-Closure Monitoring 550
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan

March 2024 T-11 Engineering Analytics, Inc.
Table 9-1 Summary of Reclamation and Decommissioning Cost Estimate
Item Description Subtasks Subtotal Total
1 Reclamation and
Decommissioning –
Mill Site Demolition
Building/Structure Demolition $655,381
Earthworks, Decontamination, Clean-up,
and Revegetation $805,087
$1,460,468
2 Reclamation and
Decommissioning –
Tailings Reclamation
Mill Site Demolition Materials $459,248
Borrow Excavation $4,150,627
Regrading / Channel Construction $2,889,498
Interim Cover Construction $376,129
Final Cover Construction $3,373,068
$11,248,571
3 Management and Miscellaneous $4,652,593
4 Pre-bid/Bid-phase Engineering and Redesign $390,637
5 Profit Allowance $1,736,163
6 Contingency $4,340,408
7 Licensing and Bonding $347,233
8 Long Term Care Fund $1,222,858
Estimated Total Reclamation and Decommissioning Costs $25,398,929

FIGURES

Source: Hydro-Engineering, 2005b.
Project No. 110444 March 2024
FIGURE 2-1
SITE LOCATION
SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM FACILITY
Engineering Analytics, Inc.
SHOOTARING CANYON
URANIUM FACILITY
3433
34
MILL
HW
Y

2
7
6
1 MILE RADIUS
EXISTING
TAILINGS
MILL
SITE
BLM LAND
CROSS VALLEY
BERM
ORSPRING
*
SEEPORSPRING
SEEPORSPRING
BLM LAND
SHOOTARING DAM
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
Based on: Hydro-Engineering, 2005b.
Project No. 110444
NORTH
March 2024
FIGURE 2-2
LOCATION AND FEATURES
SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM FACILITY
Engineering Analytics, Inc.
SCALE IN MILES
0 1/2
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
QUARRY
AREA
MILL
AREA
ORE
STOCKPILE
AREA
CROSS VALLEY
BERM
NORTH DIKE
EAST DIKE
EXISTING TAILINGS
SOUTH DAM
EXISTING TAILINGS
IMPACTED SOILS
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
ROAD
FENCE LINE
BUILDING
DRAINAGE OR STREAM
Project No. 110444
NORTH
March 2024
FIGURE 2-4
EXISTING CONDITIONS
SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM FACILITY
Engineering Analytics, Inc.
SCALE IN FEET
0 600'
RADIATION CONTROL BOUNDARY
ORE
STOCKPILE
AREA
TANK
FARM
CONVEYOR
GENERATOR
ROOM
CHANGING
ROOM
MILL
BUILDING
LAB
MAINTENANCE
BUILDING
CCD
CIRCUIT
AMMONIA
TANK
VANADIUM
PACKAGING
BUILDING
VANADIUM SX
BUILDING
BREAK ROOM
TRAILER
PARKING
ADMIN
BUILDING
GATE
TRUCK
WASH
PRODUCT
LOADING
AREA
ORE
PAD
DUST CONTROL
POND
SODIUM
CHLORATE
GATE
GATE
CONTOUR
INTERVAL 10 FT.
LEGEND
ROAD
FENCE LINE
BUILDING
Project No. 110444
NORTH
March 2024
FIGURE 2-5
PLANT AND RELATED FACILITIES
SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM FACILITY
Engineering Analytics, Inc.
SCALE IN FEET
0 100'RADIATION CONTROL BOUNDARY
November 2023
FIGURE 4-8
TWO-DIMENSIONAL SEEP/W MODEL USED IN
THE INFILTRATION ANALYSES
SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM FACILITY
Project No. 110444
12 Inches
42 Inches
12 Inches
12 Inches
18 Inches
704 Inches
12 Inches
600 Inches
November 2023
FIGURE 4-9
SWCCs FOR THE MATERIALS USED IN THE ANALYSES
SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM FACILITY
Project No. 110444
November 2023
FIGURE 4-10
HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY FUNCTIONS FOR THE
MATERIALS USED IN THE ANALYSES
SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM FACILITY
Project No. 110444
November 2023
FIGURE 4-11
SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES
CROSS SECTION A OVERVIEW
SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM FACILITY
Project No. 110444
November 2023
FIGURE 4-12
SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES
CROSS SECTION A, STATIC, CIRCULAR
SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM FACILITY
Project No. 110444
November 2023
FIGURE 4-13
SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES
CROSS SECTION A, STATIC, BLOCK
SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM FACILITY
Project No. 110444
November 2023
FIGURE 4-14
SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES
CROSS SECTION A, PSEUDO-STATIC, CIRCULAR
SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM FACILITY
Project No. 110444
November 2023
FIGURE 4-15
SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES
CROSS SECTION A, PSEUDO-STATIC, BLOCK
SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM FACILITY
Project No. 110444
Je
JeJe
Je
Je Je
Je
JeJe
Je
Je
Je
Je
Je
PROPERTY BOUNDRY
Je
Je
Je
Je WITH
TALUS
COVERED
SLOPES
N58E
N82W
VERT.N5E, 60W
N50E, VERT.
Qt
Qt
Qt
Qt
Qt
Qt
Qp
Qp
Qp
Qal
Qal
?
?
Qe
Qe
Qe
QeQe
Qe
Qe
Qe
Qe
Qe
EOLIAN SAND
BORROW AREA
PEDIMENT
BORROW AREA
ROCK
BORROW
AREA
SOUTH
GRADING
AREA
NORTH
GRADING
AREA
EAST
GRADING
AREA
CONTOUR INTERVAL
10 FT.
LEGEND
STREAM DEPOSITS
TALUS DEPOSITS
EOLIAN SAND
PEDIMENT GRAVELS
ENTRADA FORMATION
APPROX. LIMITS OF SIGNIFICANTLYTHICK EOLIAN SAND
APPROXIMATE LITHOLOGICCONTACT
FAULT
STRIKE AND DIP INFORMATION
EOLIAN SAND BORROW AREA
PEDIMENT BORROW AREA
ROCK BORROW AREA
GRADING AREAS
APPROX. SAMPLE LOCATION
Je
Qp
Qt
Qal
N58E
Based on:
Woodward-Clyde Consultants, 1978. Tailings
Management Plan and Geotechnical Engineering
Studies, Shootaring Canyon Project, Garfield County,
Utah, September.
Qe
Project No. 110444 March 2024
FIGURE 4-17
GEOLOGIC MAP WITH BORROW SOURCE AREAS
SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM FACILITY
Engineering Analytics, Inc.
NORTH
SCALE IN FEET
0 400'
EOLIAN SAND
SAMPLE LOCATION
PEDIMENT
SAMPLE
LOCATIONS
Project No. 110444 November 2023
FIGURE 8-1
RECLAMATION AND DECOMMISSIONING SCHEDULE
SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM FACILITY
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Salvage Of Mill Components
Gamma-Soil Radionuclide Relationship
Ammonia Tank Conversion
Truck Scale Cleanup and Building Demo
Ore Hopper Demo
Acid Tank & Foundation Demo
CCD Circuit Demo
Mill Demo
Vanadium Circuit Demo
Tanks And Foundations E. Of Mill Demo
Sodium Chlorate Tank, Found. Demo
Concrete Trench Demo
Tailings Conveyance System Demo
Removal Of Contaminated Soils from Around Buildings
Removal Of Contaminated Soils from Ore Pad Area
Radioactive Containment Storage Area Cleanup
Soil Verification
Recontouring, Shaping and Seeding Mill Site and Borrow
Management, Reporting, Testing & Monitoring
Mobilization and Demobilization
Mill Site Demolition/Decontamination Materials
Sand Borrow Excavation
Rock Borrow Excavation
North Regrading
Drainage Channel Construction, North Grading
Drainage Channel Construction, South Grading
Tailings Cell Regrading
Interim Sand Cover Material
Reclamation and Decommissioning Report
Clay Borrow Haul Road Culvert Replacement
Clay Borrow Excavation and Haul
Pediment Borrow Excavation
Additional Interim Sand Camber Adjustment
Clay Cover Material
Final Sand Cover Material
Pediment Soil Cover Material
Rock Mulch Cover Placement
Rock Mulch and Riprap Production
Windblown Contamination & General Regrading
As-Built Report Preparation and Submittal
Days of the Project
Reclamation and Decommissioning Schedule
PHASE I - TAILINGSREGRADING AND INTERIM COVER CONSTRUCTION (334 DAYS, 11 MONTHS)
PHASE I - MILL DECOMMISSIONING AND SHAPING (422 DAYS, 14 MONTHS)
PHASE II - FINAL COVER CONSTRUCTION (445 DAYS, 15 MONTHS)
APPENDIX A
TEST PIT LOGS FOR 2023 FIELD INVESTIGATION

0
2
4
6
8
10
0'-3" - Clayey GRAVEL - Very moist, reddish brown (5YR 4/4),
medium dense, 1/4" gravel to 8" cobbles with silty clay.
3"-3' - CLAY - Moist, reddish brown (5YR 4/4), medium dense.
3'-7.5' - CLAYSTONE - reddish brown (5YR 4/4), dense
claystone with some fine grained sand.
7.5' - Refusal. Sandstone, dry, light gray (5YR 7/1) with some
reddish brown (5YR 3/2), very hard
EOTP
ENGINEERING ANALYTICS, INC.
TEST PIT LOG
Test Pit No.: EA-TP1
PROJECT
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Closure Design
PROJECT NO.
110444
CLIENT
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
DATE
03/23/2023
LOCATION
LAT:37.7136 LONG:-110.8842333
ELEV.
EXCAVATION METHOD
Komatsu Mini-Excavator - PC78US
LOGGER
JSA
DEPTH TO - Water:
N/A
When checked:Caving:
Notes:
DEPTH
(FEET)
SA
M
P
L
E

T
Y
P
E
SAMPLE
ID DESCRIPTION DENSITY
pcf
MOISTURE
%
0
2
4
6
8
10
0'-6" - Clayey SILT - Slightly moist, dark reddish gray (5YR 4/
2), soft, with little gravel. (Surrounding area has up to 2' diameter
boulders on surface).
6"-2' - Silty CLAY - Moist, dark reddish gray (5YR 4/2), soft,
with trace calcite veins.
2'-3' - CLAYSTONE - Slightly moist, dark reddish gray (5YR 4/
2), hard.
3'-5' - SHALE - Dark reddish gray (5YR 4/2), hard.
5' - Refusal.
EOTP
ENGINEERING ANALYTICS, INC.
TEST PIT LOG
Test Pit No.: EA-TP2
PROJECT
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Closure Design
PROJECT NO.
110444
CLIENT
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
DATE
03/23/2023
LOCATION
LAT: 37.71233889 LONG:-110.8844722
ELEV.
EXCAVATION METHOD
Komatsu Mini-Excavator - PC78US
LOGGER
JSA
DEPTH TO - Water:When checked:Caving:
Notes:
DEPTH
(FEET)
SA
M
P
L
E

T
Y
P
E
SAMPLE
ID DESCRIPTION DENSITY
pcf
MOISTURE
%
0
2
4
6
8
10
0'-2' - CLAY - Very moist, dark reddish brown (5YR 3/3), soft,
with some 1/4" to 1" diameter gravel on surface.
2'-3.5' - SANDSTONE - Pale olive (5Y 6/3), very hard.
3.5' - Refusal.
EOTP
ENGINEERING ANALYTICS, INC.
TEST PIT LOG
Test Pit No.: EA-TP3
PROJECT
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Closure Design
PROJECT NO.
110444
CLIENT
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
DATE
03/23/2023
LOCATION
LAT:37.71204722 LONG:-110.88345
ELEV.
EXCAVATION METHOD
Komatsu Mini-Excavator
LOGGER
JSA
DEPTH TO - Water:When checked:Caving:
Notes:
DEPTH
(FEET)
SA
M
P
L
E

T
Y
P
E
SAMPLE
ID DESCRIPTION DENSITY
pcf
MOISTURE
%
0
2
4
6
8
10
0'-3' - Silty CLAY - Moist, reddish brown (5YR 4/4), with fine
sand.
3'-5' - Silty CLAYSTONE - Reddish brown (5YR 4/4), hard.
5'-6' - SANDSTONE - Pale olive (5Y 6/3)
EOTP
ENGINEERING ANALYTICS, INC.
TEST PIT LOG
Test Pit No.: EA-TP4
PROJECT
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Closure Design
PROJECT NO.
110444
CLIENT
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
DATE
03/23/2023
LOCATION
LAT:37.711380556 LONG:-110.8833
ELEV.
EXCAVATION METHOD
Komatsu Mini-Excavator
LOGGER
JSA
DEPTH TO - Water:When checked:Caving:
Notes:
DEPTH
(FEET)
SA
M
P
L
E

T
Y
P
E
SAMPLE
ID DESCRIPTION DENSITY
pcf
MOISTURE
%
0
2
4
6
8
10
0'-2.5' - Silty CLAY - Moist, reddish brown (5YR 4/4), soft.
2.5'-3' - Color change to pale olive (5Y 6/3).
3'-6' - CLAYSTONE - Moist, reddish brown (5YR 4/4), hard.
EOTP
ENGINEERING ANALYTICS, INC.
TEST PIT LOG
Test Pit No.: EA-TP5
PROJECT
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Closure Design
PROJECT NO.
110444
CLIENT
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
DATE
03/23/2023
LOCATION
LAT:37.71095 LONG: 110.8832278
ELEV.
EXCAVATION METHOD
Komatsu Mini-Excavator
LOGGER
JSA
DEPTH TO - Water:When checked:Caving:
Notes:
DEPTH
(FEET)
SA
M
P
L
E

T
Y
P
E
SAMPLE
ID DESCRIPTION DENSITY
pcf
MOISTURE
%
0
2
4
6
8
10
0'-8" - CLAY - Very moist, reddish brown (5YR 4/4), soft.
8"-7' - SHALE - Dry, reddish brown (5YR 4/4), hard.
EOTP
ENGINEERING ANALYTICS, INC.
TEST PIT LOG
Test Pit No.: EA-TP6
PROJECT
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Closure Design
PROJECT NO.
110444
CLIENT
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
DATE
03/23/2023
LOCATION
LAT:37.708705556 LONG:-110.882358333
ELEV.
EXCAVATION METHOD
Komatsu Mini-Excavator
LOGGER
JSA
DEPTH TO - Water:When checked:Caving:
Notes:Equipment operator said this shale material breaks down with water and/or equipment.
DEPTH
(FEET)
SA
M
P
L
E

T
Y
P
E
SAMPLE
ID DESCRIPTION DENSITY
pcf
MOISTURE
%
0
2
4
6
8
10
0'-1.5' - Silty CLAY - Very moist, reddish brown (5YR 4/4), soft.
Upper 0.5' had cobbles ranging from 3" to 6" diameter.
1.5'-7' - Change to dry, pale olive (5Y 6/3), dense silty clay.
EOTP
ENGINEERING ANALYTICS, INC.
TEST PIT LOG
Test Pit No.: EA-TP7
PROJECT
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Closure Design
PROJECT NO.
110444
CLIENT
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
DATE
03/23/2023
LOCATION
LAT:37.708255556 LONG:-110.882380556
ELEV.
EXCAVATION METHOD
Komatsu Mini-Excavator
LOGGER
JSA
DEPTH TO - Water:When checked:Caving:
Notes:
DEPTH
(FEET)
SA
M
P
L
E

T
Y
P
E
SAMPLE
ID DESCRIPTION DENSITY
pcf
MOISTURE
%
0
2
4
6
8
10
0'-1.5' - Silty CLAY - Moist, reddish brown (5YR 4/4), soft.
Upper 0.5' has 1/4" to 6" diameter rock.
1.5'-6.5' - Change to dry, pale olive (5Y 6/3), medium dense silty
clay.
6.5'-7' - WEATHERED CLAYSTONE - Blocky.
EOTP
ENGINEERING ANALYTICS, INC.
TEST PIT LOG
Test Pit No.: EA-TP8
PROJECT
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Closure Design
PROJECT NO.
110444
CLIENT
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
DATE
03/24/2023
LOCATION
LAT:37.707511111 LONG:-110.88255
ELEV.
EXCAVATION METHOD
Komatsu Mini-Excavator
LOGGER
JSA
DEPTH TO - Water:When checked:Caving:
Notes:
DEPTH
(FEET)
SA
M
P
L
E

T
Y
P
E
SAMPLE
ID DESCRIPTION DENSITY
pcf
MOISTURE
%
1. These logs are subject to the limitations, conclusions, and
recommendations in this report.
2. Results of tests conducted on samples recovered are reported
on the logs.
_
Notes:
Symbol Description
Strata symbols
Gravel
Clay
Shale and Claystone
Silt
Shale
Sandstone
Weathered claystone
Soil Samplers
Bulk/Grab sample
Shelby Tube
Bag Sample
KEY TO SYMBOLS
APPENDIX B
RESULTS OF LABORATORY TESTING FOR
SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM FACILITY

APPENDIX B.1
SELECT RESULTS FROM HYDRO-ENGINEERING
(2005B) LABORATORY TESTING

ROCK DURABILITY TESTING RESULTS
(HYDRO-ENGINEERING, 2005B)

ROCK DURABILITY SCORE
(HYDRO-ENGINEERING, 2005B)

APPENDIX B.2
PETROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
(PASTER, 2002)

APPENDIX B.3
RESULTS FROM ADVANCED TERRA TESTING (2008)
LABORATORY TESTING

APPENDIX B.4
SELECT RESULTS FROM TETRA TECH (2008B)
LABORATORY TESTING

Tetra Tech
101
102
103
104
105
051015202530
Su
c
t
i
o
n

(
k
P
a
)
Gravimetric Water Content (%)
1,500 kPa (15 bars)
15.3 %

Soil-Water Characteristic Curve for
Radon Barrier Clay
(Jmb Green)

APPENDIX B.5
RESULTS FROM ENGINEERING ANALYTICS (2023)
LABORATORY TESTING

JOB NAME:DATE: 4/14/2023
EA-TP1
3" - 28" Shelby
16.8 94.3 --
3" - 36" Bucket
-- 14 / 41 / 27 -
EA-TP2
3" - 24" Shelby
21.8 79.0 --
0.5' - 2' Bucket
-- 25 / 75 / 50 -
EA-TP3
0' - 2' Bucket
-- 18 / 72 / 54 -
N/A Shelby
26.9 79.9 --
EA-TP4
0' - 3' Bucket
-- 13 / 32 / 19 -
0.5' - 2.5' Shelby
15.2 97.9 --
EA-TP5
0' - 2.5' Bucket
-- 16 / 48 / 32 -
1' - 3' Shelby
14.1 101.9 --
*PL = Plastic Limit LL = Liquid Limit PI = Plasticity Index N.P. = Non Plastic; (1) = See Attached
Shootaring Rec Plan JOB NUMBER: 110444
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
Depth (ft.)Sample
Type
Moisture
(%)
Dry Density
(pcf)
Soil Water Characteristics Curve
(SWCC)
Atterberg
Limits
PL/LL/PI
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
JOB NAME:DATE: 4/14/2023Shootaring Rec Plan JOB NUMBER: 110444
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
Depth (ft.)Sample
Type
Moisture
(%)
Dry Density
(pcf)
Soil Water Characteristics Curve
(SWCC)
Atterberg
Limits
PL/LL/PI
EA-TP6
0" - 8" Bucket
-- 24 / 78 / 54 -
8" - 84" Bucket
-- 25 / 68 / 43 -
EA-TP7
0' - 1.5' Bucket
-- 24 / 69 / 45 -
0' - 1.5' Shelby
32.0 80.6 --
EA-TP8
0 - 1.5' Bucket
-- 15 / 38 / 23 -
3" - 18" Shelby
18.9 94.2 --
1.5' - 7' Bucket
-- 24 / 62 / 38 -
*PL = Plastic Limit LL = Liquid Limit PI = Plasticity Index N.P. = Non Plastic; (1) = See Attached
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
Tested By: CD Checked By: AW
LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT
PL
A
S
T
I
C
I
T
Y

I
N
D
E
X
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
LIQUID LIMIT
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
CL-ML
CL o
r

O
L
CH o
r

O
H
ML or OL MH or OH
Dashed line indicates the approximate
upper limit boundary for natural soils
4
7
SOIL DATA
SYMBOL SOURCE
NATURAL
USCSSAMPLE DEPTH WATER PLASTIC LIQUID PLASTICITY
NO.CONTENT LIMIT LIMIT INDEX
(%)(%)(%)(%)
ENGINEERING ANALYTICS, INC.
Client:
Project:
Project No.:Figure
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Closure Design
110444
EA-TP1 0.25 14 41 27
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
Tested By: CD Checked By: AW
LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT
PL
A
S
T
I
C
I
T
Y

I
N
D
E
X
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
LIQUID LIMIT
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
CL-ML
CL o
r

O
L
CH o
r

O
H
ML or OL MH or OH
Dashed line indicates the approximate
upper limit boundary for natural soils
4
7
SOIL DATA
SYMBOL SOURCE
NATURAL
USCSSAMPLE DEPTH WATER PLASTIC LIQUID PLASTICITY
NO.CONTENT LIMIT LIMIT INDEX
(%)(%)(%)(%)
ENGINEERING ANALYTICS, INC.
Client:
Project:
Project No.:Figure
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Closure Design
110444
EA-TP2 0.5 25 75 50
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
Tested By: CD Checked By: AW
LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT
PL
A
S
T
I
C
I
T
Y

I
N
D
E
X
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
LIQUID LIMIT
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
CL-ML
CL o
r

O
L
CH o
r

O
H
ML or OL MH or OH
Dashed line indicates the approximate
upper limit boundary for natural soils
4
7
SOIL DATA
SYMBOL SOURCE
NATURAL
USCSSAMPLE DEPTH WATER PLASTIC LIQUID PLASTICITY
NO.CONTENT LIMIT LIMIT INDEX
(%)(%)(%)(%)
ENGINEERING ANALYTICS, INC.
Client:
Project:
Project No.:Figure
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Closure Design
110444
EA-TP3 0 18 72 54
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
Tested By: CD Checked By: AW
LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT
PL
A
S
T
I
C
I
T
Y

I
N
D
E
X
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
LIQUID LIMIT
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
CL-ML
CL o
r

O
L
CH o
r

O
H
ML or OL MH or OH
Dashed line indicates the approximate
upper limit boundary for natural soils
4
7
SOIL DATA
SYMBOL SOURCE
NATURAL
USCSSAMPLE DEPTH WATER PLASTIC LIQUID PLASTICITY
NO.CONTENT LIMIT LIMIT INDEX
(%)(%)(%)(%)
ENGINEERING ANALYTICS, INC.
Client:
Project:
Project No.:Figure
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Closure Design
110444
EA-TP4 0 13 32 19
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
Tested By: CD Checked By: AW
LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT
PL
A
S
T
I
C
I
T
Y

I
N
D
E
X
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
LIQUID LIMIT
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
CL-ML
CL o
r

O
L
CH o
r

O
H
ML or OL MH or OH
Dashed line indicates the approximate
upper limit boundary for natural soils
4
7
SOIL DATA
SYMBOL SOURCE
NATURAL
USCSSAMPLE DEPTH WATER PLASTIC LIQUID PLASTICITY
NO.CONTENT LIMIT LIMIT INDEX
(%)(%)(%)(%)
ENGINEERING ANALYTICS, INC.
Client:
Project:
Project No.:Figure
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Closure Design
110444
EA-TP5 0 16 48 32
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
Tested By: CD Checked By: AW
LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT
PL
A
S
T
I
C
I
T
Y

I
N
D
E
X
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
LIQUID LIMIT
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
CL-ML
CL o
r

O
L
CH o
r

O
H
ML or OL MH or OH
Dashed line indicates the approximate
upper limit boundary for natural soils
4
7
SOIL DATA
SYMBOL SOURCE
NATURAL
USCSSAMPLE DEPTH WATER PLASTIC LIQUID PLASTICITY
NO.CONTENT LIMIT LIMIT INDEX
(%)(%)(%)(%)
ENGINEERING ANALYTICS, INC.
Client:
Project:
Project No.:Figure
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Closure Design
110444
EA-TP6 0.67 25 68 43
EA-TP6 0 24 78 54
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
Tested By: CD Checked By: AW
LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT
PL
A
S
T
I
C
I
T
Y

I
N
D
E
X
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
LIQUID LIMIT
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
CL-ML
CL o
r

O
L
CH o
r

O
H
ML or OL MH or OH
Dashed line indicates the approximate
upper limit boundary for natural soils
4
7
SOIL DATA
SYMBOL SOURCE
NATURAL
USCSSAMPLE DEPTH WATER PLASTIC LIQUID PLASTICITY
NO.CONTENT LIMIT LIMIT INDEX
(%)(%)(%)(%)
ENGINEERING ANALYTICS, INC.
Client:
Project:
Project No.:Figure
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Closure Design
110444
EA-TP7 0 24 69 45
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
Tested By: CD Checked By: AW
LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT
PL
A
S
T
I
C
I
T
Y

I
N
D
E
X
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
LIQUID LIMIT
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
CL-ML
CL o
r

O
L
CH o
r

O
H
ML or OL MH or OH
Dashed line indicates the approximate
upper limit boundary for natural soils
4
7
SOIL DATA
SYMBOL SOURCE
NATURAL
USCSSAMPLE DEPTH WATER PLASTIC LIQUID PLASTICITY
NO.CONTENT LIMIT LIMIT INDEX
(%)(%)(%)(%)
ENGINEERING ANALYTICS, INC.
Client:
Project:
Project No.:Figure
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Closure Design
110444
EA-TP8 0 15 38 23
EA-TP8 1.5 24 62 38
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Dr
y

d
e
n
s
i
t
y
,

p
c
f
85
87
89
91
93
95
Water content, %
19 21.5 24 26.5 29 31.5 34
25.0%, 92.6 pcf
ZAV SpG
2.65
1 2 3 4 5 6
Curve No.
1
Test Specification:
TESTING DATA
TEST RESULTS Material Description
Remarks:
Project No.Client:
Project:
Source of Sample: EA-TP3 Depth: 0 Checked by:
ENGINEERING ANALYTICS, INC.Title:
Figure
ASTM D 698-12 Method A Standard
5.5 lb.
12 in.
manual
three 25
0.03333 cu. ft.
#4
72 54
04/20/23
EH
CLAY
110444 Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
EH
Preparation Method
Hammer Wt.
Hammer Drop
Hammer Type:
Layers Blows/Layer
Mold Size
Test Performed on Material
Passing Sieve
NM LL PI
Sp.G. (assumed):
%>#4 %<No.200
USCS AASHTO
Date Sampled
Date Received
Date Tested
Tested By
WM + WS
WM
WW + T #1
WD + T #1
TARE #1
WW + T #2
WD + T #2
TARE #2
MOISTURE
DRY DENSITY
5830.6 5967.9 5998.2 5971.8
4254.0 4254.0 4254.0 4254.0
1121.2 1049.4 1079.7 952.6
976.2 904.6 902.2 788.7
295.1 292.0 265.0 242.0
21.3 23.6 27.9 30.0
86.0 91.7 90.2 87.4
Maximum dry density = 92.6 pcf
Optimum moisture = 25.0 %
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Closure Design
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Dr
y

d
e
n
s
i
t
y
,

p
c
f
95
100
105
110
115
120
Water content, %
11 13 15 17 19 21 23
15.1%, 113.6 pcf
ZAV SpG
2.65
1 2 3 4 5 6
Curve No.
2
Test Specification:
TESTING DATA
TEST RESULTS Material Description
Remarks:
Project No.Client:
Project:
Source of Sample: EA-TP4 Depth: 0 Checked by:
ENGINEERING ANALYTICS, INC.Title:
Figure
ASTM D 698-12 Method A Standard
5.5 lb.
12 in.
manual
three 25
0.03333 cu. ft.
#4
32 19
04/21/23
EH
Silty CLAY
110444 Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
EH
Preparation Method
Hammer Wt.
Hammer Drop
Hammer Type:
Layers Blows/Layer
Mold Size
Test Performed on Material
Passing Sieve
NM LL PI
Sp.G. (assumed):
%>#4 %<No.200
USCS AASHTO
Date Sampled
Date Received
Date Tested
Tested By
WM + WS
WM
WW + T #1
WD + T #1
TARE #1
WW + T #2
WD + T #2
TARE #2
MOISTURE
DRY DENSITY
6178.6 6237.0 6213.0 6149.1 6100.5
4254.0 4254.0 4254.0 4254.0 4254.0
1392.7 1301.2 1296.7 1212.5 1186.5
1261.8 1164.8 1146.1 1060.3 1093.5
282.5 291.3 291.8 295.1 290.8
13.4 15.6 17.6 19.9 11.6
112.3 113.5 110.2 104.6 109.5
Maximum dry density = 113.6 pcf
Optimum moisture = 15.1 %
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Closure Design
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Dr
y

d
e
n
s
i
t
y
,

p
c
f
82.3
82.8
83.3
83.8
84.3
84.8
Water content, %
27 28.5 30 31.5 33 34.5 36
30.2%, 84.4 pcf ZAV SpG
2.60
1 2 3 4 5 6
Curve No.
3
Test Specification:
TESTING DATA
TEST RESULTS Material Description
Remarks:
Project No.Client:
Project:
Source of Sample: EA-TP6 Depth: 0.67 Checked by:
ENGINEERING ANALYTICS, INC.Title:
Figure
ASTM D 698-12 Method A Standard
5.5 lb.
12 in.
manual
three 25
0.03333 cu. ft.
#4
68 43
04/21/23
EH
CLAY
110444 Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
EH
Preparation Method
Hammer Wt.
Hammer Drop
Hammer Type:
Layers Blows/Layer
Mold Size
Test Performed on Material
Passing Sieve
NM LL PI
Sp.G. (assumed):
%>#4 %<No.200
USCS AASHTO
Date Sampled
Date Received
Date Tested
Tested By
WM + WS
WM
WW + T #1
WD + T #1
TARE #1
WW + T #2
WD + T #2
TARE #2
MOISTURE
DRY DENSITY
5885.7 5913.7 5935.3 5938.0
4254.0 4254.0 4254.0 4254.0
1219.0 1101.1 1146.7 1195.7
1014.9 898.8 936.5 964.4
290.0 226.1 287.8 293.1
28.2 30.1 32.4 34.4
84.2 84.4 84.0 82.8
Maximum dry density = 84.4 pcf
Optimum moisture = 30.2 %
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Closure Design
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Dr
y

d
e
n
s
i
t
y
,

p
c
f
88.5
90
91.5
93
94.5
96
Water content, %
21 23 25 27 29 31 33
25.4%, 95.3 pcf ZAV SpG
2.65
1 2 3 4 5 6
Curve No.
4
Test Specification:
TESTING DATA
TEST RESULTS Material Description
Remarks:
Project No.Client:
Project:
Source of Sample: EA-TP8 Depth: 1.5 Checked by:
ENGINEERING ANALYTICS, INC.Title:
Figure
ASTM D 698-12 Method A Standard
5.5 lb.
12 in.
manual
three 25
0.03333 cu. ft.
#4
62 38
04/20/23
EH
CLAY
110444 Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
EH
Preparation Method
Hammer Wt.
Hammer Drop
Hammer Type:
Layers Blows/Layer
Mold Size
Test Performed on Material
Passing Sieve
NM LL PI
Sp.G. (assumed):
%>#4 %<No.200
USCS AASHTO
Date Sampled
Date Received
Date Tested
Tested By
WM + WS
WM
WW + T #1
WD + T #1
TARE #1
WW + T #2
WD + T #2
TARE #2
MOISTURE
DRY DENSITY
6000.5 6060.5 6066.8 6037.2
4254.0 4254.0 4254.0 4254.0
1194.5 1241.7 1163.7 1075.1
1025.2 1047.9 969.7 893.7
290.0 282.5 265.7 293.0
23.0 25.3 27.6 30.2
93.9 95.3 94.0 90.6
Maximum dry density = 95.3 pcf
Optimum moisture = 25.4 %
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Closure Design
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
Tested By: AW Checked By: KG
LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT
PL
A
S
T
I
C
I
T
Y

I
N
D
E
X
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
LIQUID LIMIT
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
CL-ML
CL o
r

O
L
CH o
r

O
H
ML or OL MH or OH
Dashed line indicates the approximate
upper limit boundary for natural soils
4
7
SOIL DATA
SYMBOL SOURCE
NATURAL
USCSSAMPLE DEPTH WATER PLASTIC LIQUID PLASTICITY
NO.CONTENT LIMIT LIMIT INDEX
(%)(%)(%)(%)
ENGINEERING ANALYTICS, INC.
Client:
Project:
Project No.:Figure
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Closure Design
110444
Aeolian 0.9 NP NV NP SM
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
Particle Size Distribution Report
PE
R
C
E
N
T

F
I
N
E
R
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
GRAIN SIZE - mm.
0.00010.0010.010.1110100
% +3"Coarse
% Gravel
Fine Coarse Medium
% Sand
Fine Silt
% Fines
Clay
0.0 0.0 1.1 0.6 1.8 82.4 14.1
6
i
n
.
3
i
n
.
2
i
n
.
1½

i
n
.
1
i
n
.
¾
i
n
.
½
i
n
.
3/
8

i
n
.
#4 #1
0
#2
0
#3
0
#4
0
#6
0
#1
0
0
#1
4
0
#2
0
0
Test Results (ASTM D6913 & D1140)Material Description Atterberg (ASTM D4318)
Coefficients
Sieve Test (ASTM D6913 & D1140)
Hydrometer Test USCS (ASTM D2487)
Client:
Project:
Project No:Figure
Sieve Size
or
Diam. (mm.)
Finer
(%)
Spec.*
(%)
Out of
Spec.
(%)
Silty Sand NP NV NP
3/43/8#4#10#20#40#60#100#140#200
100.099.498.998.397.696.589.936.823.514.1
0.2504 0.2305
0.1855 0.17148/14/2023 EH
0.1318 0.0776
SM
8/10/2023
KG
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Closure Design
110444
PL= LL= PI=
D90=D85=
D60=D50=
D30=D15=
D10=
Cu=Cc=
Test Notes
Test Date:Technician:
Test Notes
Test Date:Technician:
Date Sampled:
Date Received:
Checked By:
Title:
*(no specification provided)
Source of Sample: Aeolian
ENGINEERING ANALYTICS, INC.
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Dr
y

d
e
n
s
i
t
y
,

p
c
f
109
110.5
112
113.5
115
116.5
Water content, %
2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5
10.8%, 114.6 pcf
ZAV SpG
2.60
1 2 3 4 5 6
Curve No.
Test Specification:
TESTING DATA
TEST RESULTS Material Description
Remarks:
Project No.Client:
Project:
Source of Sample: Aeolian Checked by:
ENGINEERING ANALYTICS, INC.Title:
Figure
ASTM D 698-12 Method B Standard
Moist
5.5 lb.
12 in.
Manual
three 25
0.03333 cu. ft.
3/8 in.
0.9 NV NP
2.631
0.6 14.1
SM A-2-4(0)
8/10/2023
8/10/2023
AW
Silty Sand
110444 Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
KG
Preparation Method
Hammer Wt.
Hammer Drop
Hammer Type:
Layers Blows/Layer
Mold Size
Test Performed on Material
Passing Sieve
NM LL PI
Sp.G. (assumed):
%>3/8 in.%<No.200
USCS AASHTO
Date Sampled
Date Received
Date Tested
Tested By
WM + WS
WM
WW + T #1
WD + T #1
TARE #1
WW + T #2
WD + T #2
TARE #2
MOISTURE
DRY DENSITY
6027.5 6080.0 6133.7 6177.4 6151.8
4254.1 4254.1 4254.1 4254.1 4254.1
1123.7 1227.7 1319.3 1148.7 1154.4
1083.0 1164.5 1238.8 1063.9 1060.1
300.3 301.0 370.0 300.1 375.6
5.2 7.3 9.3 11.1 13.8
111.5 112.5 113.8 114.5 110.3
Maximum dry density = 114.6 pcf
Optimum moisture = 10.8 %
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Closure Design
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
Tested By: EH Checked By: KG
LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT
PL
A
S
T
I
C
I
T
Y

I
N
D
E
X
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
LIQUID LIMIT
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
CL-ML
CL o
r

O
L
CH o
r

O
H
ML or OL MH or OH
Dashed line indicates the approximate
upper limit boundary for natural soils
4
7
SOIL DATA
SYMBOL SOURCE
NATURAL
USCSSAMPLE DEPTH WATER PLASTIC LIQUID PLASTICITY
NO.CONTENT LIMIT LIMIT INDEX
(%)(%)(%)(%)
ENGINEERING ANALYTICS, INC.
Client:
Project:
Project No.:Figure
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Closure Design
110444
0 1.0 NP NV NP SM
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
Particle Size Distribution Report
PE
R
C
E
N
T

F
I
N
E
R
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
GRAIN SIZE - mm.
0.00010.0010.010.1110100
% +3"Coarse
% Gravel
Fine Coarse Medium
% Sand
Fine Silt
% Fines
Clay
0.0 0.0 8.0 5.7 5.9 56.2 24.2
6
i
n
.
3
i
n
.
2
i
n
.
1½

i
n
.
1
i
n
.
¾
i
n
.
½
i
n
.
3/
8

i
n
.
#4 #1
0
#2
0
#3
0
#4
0
#6
0
#1
0
0
#1
4
0
#2
0
0
Test Results (ASTM D6913 & D1140)Material Description Atterberg (ASTM D4318)
Coefficients
Sieve Test (ASTM D6913 & D1140)
Hydrometer Test USCS (ASTM D2487)
Client:
Project:
Project No:Figure
Sieve Size
or
Diam. (mm.)
Finer
(%)
Spec.*
(%)
Out of
Spec.
(%)
Bulk South @ 0-2'NP NV NP
13/43/8#4#10#20#40#60#100#140#200
100.0100.096.392.086.382.480.478.359.337.124.2
3.5513 1.5718
0.1522 0.12948/02/2023 EH
0.0890
SM
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Closure Design
110444
PL= LL= PI=
D90=D85=
D60=D50=
D30=D15=
D10=
Cu=Cc=
Test Notes
Test Date:Technician:
Test Notes
Test Date:Technician:
Date Sampled:
Date Received:
Checked By:
Title:
*(no specification provided)
Depth: 0
ENGINEERING ANALYTICS, INC.
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Dr
y

d
e
n
s
i
t
y
,

p
c
f
111
113
115
117
119
121
Water content, %
7.5 9 10.5 12 13.5 15 16.5
11.1%, 119.3 pcf
ZAV SpG
2.60
1 2 3 4 5 6
Curve No.
1
Test Specification:
TESTING DATA
TEST RESULTS Material Description
Remarks:
Project No.Client:
Project:
Depth: 0 Checked by:
ENGINEERING ANALYTICS, INC.Title:
Figure
ASTM D 698-12 Method B Standard
5.5 lb.
12 in.
three 25
0.03333 cu. ft.
3/8 in.
1.0 NV NP
2.593
3.7 24.2
SM A-2-4(0)
08/1/23
DS
Bulk South @ 0-2'
110444 Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
EH
Preparation Method
Hammer Wt.
Hammer Drop
Hammer Type:
Layers Blows/Layer
Mold Size
Test Performed on Material
Passing Sieve
NM LL PI
Sp.G. (D854):
%>3/8 in.%<No.200
USCS AASHTO
Date Sampled
Date Received
Date Tested
Tested By
WM + WS
WM
WW + T #1
WD + T #1
TARE #1
WW + T #2
WD + T #2
TARE #2
MOISTURE
DRY DENSITY
6174.1 6258.9 6197.9
4254.3 4254.3 4254.3
1165.1 1273.7 1157.1
1092.0 1175.4 1049.9
293.9 294.8 265.1
9.2 11.2 13.7
116.3 119.3 113.1
Maximum dry density = 119.3 pcf
Optimum moisture = 11.1 %
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Closure Design
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
APPENDIX B.6
RESULTS FROM DBS&A (2023)
LABORATORY TESTING
Laboratory Report
Shootering Closure Design,
110444
Prepared for
Engineering Analytics, Inc.

Prepared by

DBS&A Soil Testing & Research Laboratory
4400 Alameda Blvd. NE, Suite C
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87113
[phone]
www.dbstephens.com
DB23.1131.00
June 16, 2023

4400 Alameda Boulevard NE, Suite C [phone]
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87113 www.dbstephens.com
June 16, 2023
Jason Andrews
Engineering Analytics, Inc.
1600 Specht Point Rd., Suite 209
Fort Collins, CO 80526
[phone]

Re: DBS&A Laboratory Report for Project #110444, Shootering Closure Design
Dear Jason Andrews:
Enclosed is the report for the requested laboratory services. Please review this report and
provide any comments as samples will be held for a maximum of 30 days. After 30 days
samples will be returned or disposed of in an appropriate manner.
All testing results were evaluated subjectively for consistency and reasonableness, and the
results appear to be reasonably representative of the material tested. However, DBS&A does
not assume any responsibility for interpretations or analyses based on the data enclosed, nor
can we guarantee that these data are fully representative of the undisturbed materials at the
field site. We recommend that careful evaluation of these laboratory results be made for your
particular application.
The testing utilized to generate the enclosed report employs methods that are standard for the
industry. The results do not constitute a professional opinion by DBS&A, nor can the results
affect any professional or expert opinions rendered with respect thereto by DBS&A. You have
acknowledged that all the testing undertaken by us, and the report provided, constitutes mere
test results using standardized methods, and cannot be used to disqualify DBS&A from
rendering any professional or expert opinion, having waived any claim of conflict of interest
by DBS&A.
We are pleased to provide this service and look forward to future laboratory testing on other
projects. If you have any questions about the enclosed data, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
DANIEL B. STEPHENS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SOIL TESTING & RESEARCH LABORATORY
Joleen Hines
Laboratory Manager

Summaries
3
Summary of Tests Performed
Saturated
Initial Soil Hydraulic Moisture Particle Specific Air
Laboratory Properties 1 Conductivity2 Characteristics 3 Size4 Gravity5 Perm- Atterberg Proctor
Sample Number G VM VD CH FH FW HC PP FP DPP RH EP WHC
Kunsat DS WS H F C eability Limits Compaction
EA-TP3 (95%) X X X X X X X
EA-TP4 (95%) X X X X X X X
EA-TP6 (95%) X X X X X X X
EA-TP8 (95%) X X X X X X X
1 G = Gravimetric Moisture Content, VM = Volume Measurement Method, VD = Volume Displacement Method
2 CH = Constant Head Rigid Wall, FH = Falling Head Rigid Wall, FW = Falling Head Rising Tail Flexible Wall
3 HC = Hanging Column, PP = Pressure Plate, FP = Filter Paper, DPP = Dew Point Potentiometer, RH = Relative Humidity Box,
EP = Effective Porosity, WHC = Water Holding Capacity, Kunsat = Calculated Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity
4 DS = Dry Sieve, WS = Wet Sieve, H = Hydrometer
5 F = Fine (<4.75mm), C = Coarse (>4.75mm)
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
4
Notes
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
Sample Receipt:
Four samples, each as loose material in a full resealable 1-gallon bag, were received on
April 26, 2023. The samples were packaged together in a 5-gallon bucket with packing
material and all samples were received in good order.
Sample Preparation and Testing Notes:
A portion of each sample was remolded into a testing ring to target 95% of the respective
maximum dry bulk density at the respective optimum moisture content, based on standard
proctor compaction testing results provided by the requestor. The actual percentage of
maximum dry bulk density achieved was added to each sub-sample ID. Each of these
remolded sub-samples was subjected to initial properties analysis, saturation, and the
hanging column and pressure chamber portions of the moisture retention testing.
Secondary sub-samples were then prepared using the same target remold parameters.
The secondary sub-samples were extruded from the preparation ring and subjected to
saturated hydraulic conductivity testing via the flexible wall method. Separate sub-
samples were obtained for the dewpoint potentiometer and relative humidity chamber
portions of the moisture retention testing.
Porosity calculations are based on the use of an assumed specific gravity value of either
2.7 or 2.75.
5
Opt.
Moist.
Cont.
Max.
Dry
Density
Max.
Dry
Density
Moist.
Cont.
Dry
Bulk
Density
Dry
Bulk
Density
% of
Max.
Density
Moist.
Cont.
Dry
Bulk
Density
Dry
Bulk
Density
% of
Max.
Density
Dry
Bulk
Density
Dry
Bulk
Density
%
Volume
Change
% of
Max.
Density
Dry
Bulk
Density
Dry
Bulk
Density
%
Volume
Change
% of
Max.
Density
Sample ID (%, g/g) (g/cm
3) (pcf) (%, g/g) (g/cm
3) (pcf) (%) (%, g/g) (g/cm
3) (pcf) (%) (g/cm
3) (pcf) (%) (%) (g/cm
3)(pcf) (%) (%)
EA-TP3
(95%)25.0 1.48 92.6 25.0 1.41 88.0 95% 24.4 1.42 88.4 95.4% 1.35 84.5 +4.6% 91.3% 1.33 83.0 +6.4% 89.7%
EA-TP4
(95%)15.1 1.82 113.6 15.1 1.73 107.9 95% 15.1 1.73 108.1 95.1% 1.73 108.1 --- 95.1% 1.73 108.1 --- 95.1%
EA-TP6
(95%)30.2 1.35 84.4 30.2 1.28 80.2 95% 29.9 1.29 80.5 95.4% 1.24 77.6 +3.7% 92.0% 1.20 74.9 +7.4% 88.8%
EA-TP8
(95%)25.4 1.53 95.3 25.4 1.45 90.5 95% 26.2 1.44 90.2 94.6% 1.41 88.1 +2.3% 92.5% 1.40 87.3 +3.3% 91.6%
Summary of Sample Preparation/Volume Changes
Proctor Data Target Remold Parameters1 Actual Remold Data
Volume Change
Post Saturation2
Volume Change
Post Drying Curve3
1Target Remold Parameters: 95% of maximum dry density at optimum moisture content, based on standard proctor compaction data provided by the requestor.
2Volume Change Post Saturation: Volume change measurements were obtained after saturated hydraulic conductivity testing.
3Volume Change Post Drying Curve: Volume change measurements were obtained throughout hanging column and pressure plate testing. The 'Volume Change Post
Drying Curve' values represent the final sample dimensions after the last pressure plate point.
Notes:
"+" indicates sample swelling, "-" indicates sample settling, and "---" indicates no volume change occurred.
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
6
Summary of Initial Moisture Content, Dry Bulk Density
Wet Bulk Density and Calculated Porosity
Moisture Content
As Received Remolded Dry Bulk Wet Bulk Calculated
Gravimetric Volumetric Gravimetric Volumetric Density Density Porosity
Sample Number (%, g/g)(%, cm3/cm3)(%, g/g)(%, cm3/cm3)(g/cm3)(g/cm3)(%)
EA-TP3 (95%) NA NA 24.4 34.6 1.42 1.76 47.6
EA-TP4 (95%) NA NA 15.1 26.2 1.73 1.99 35.9
EA-TP6 (95%) NA NA 29.9 38.5 1.29 1.67 53.1
EA-TP8 (95%) NA NA 26.2 37.8 1.44 1.82 47.5
NA = Not analyzed
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
7
Summary of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity Tests
Oversize
Corrected Method of Analysis
Sample Number
Ksat
(cm/sec)
Ksat
(cm/sec)
Constant Head
Flexible Wall
Falling Head
Flexible Wall
EA-TP3 (95%) 2.3E-08 NA X
EA-TP4 (95%) 8.5E-07 NA X
EA-TP6 (95%) 7.7E-08 NA X
EA-TP8 (95%) 1.2E-06 NA X
NA = Not applicable
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
8
Summary of Moisture Characteristics
of the Initial Drainage Curve
Pressure Head Moisture Content
Sample Number (-cm water)(%, cm3/cm3)
EA-TP3 (95%) 0 49.5
‡‡
64 48.6 ‡‡
149 47.3 ‡‡
337 47.3 ‡‡
1530 46.9 ‡‡
14685 31.7 ‡‡
54457 24.0 ‡‡
174590 17.9 ‡‡
533151 13.4 ‡‡
852439 11.5 ‡‡
EA-TP4 (95%)0 36.2
24 36.2
75 34.4
152 31.7
337 30.1
26719 15.7
85969 12.4
193150 10.1
472065 8.0
852439 6.4
EA-TP6 (95%)0 55.2 ‡‡
64 56.1 ‡‡
149 56.0 ‡‡
337 55.8 ‡‡
1530 55.6 ‡‡
15297 33.4 ‡‡
47625 23.7 ‡‡
195904 17.4 ‡‡
592708 13.9 ‡‡
852439 12.8 ‡‡
EA-TP8 (95%)0 47.8 ‡‡
18 48.5 ‡‡
53 48.2 ‡‡
128 44.6 ‡‡
337 42.4 ‡‡
100348 17.2 ‡‡
174692 15.6 ‡‡
452893 13.0 ‡‡
662870 11.5 ‡‡
852439 10.8 ‡‡
‡‡ Volume adjustments are applicable at this matric potential (see data sheet for this sample).
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
9
Summary of Calculated Unsaturated Hydraulic Properties
Oversize Corrected
Sample Number
α
(cm-1)
N
(dimensionless)
θr
(% vol)
θs
(% vol)
θr
(% vol)
θs
(% vol)
EA-TP3 (95%) 0.0003 1.2583 0.00 48.58 NA NA
EA-TP4 (95%) 0.0065 1.1790 0.00 36.27 NA NA
EA-TP6 (95%) 0.0003 1.2819 0.00 56.57 NA NA
EA-TP8 (95%) 0.0042 1.1762 0.00 48.39 NA NA
NA = Not applicable
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
10
Initial Properties
11
Data for Initial Moisture Content,
Bulk Density, Porosity, and Percent Saturation
Job Name:Engineering Analytics, Inc.
Job Number:DB23.1131.00
Sample Number:EA-TP3 (95%)
Project Number:110444
Project Name:Shootering Closure Design
As Received Remolded
Test Date:NA 28-Apr-23
Field weight* of sample (g):524.57
Tare weight, ring (g):137.38
Tare weight, pan/plate (g):0.00
Tare weight, other (g):0.00
Dry weight of sample (g):311.13
Sample volume (cm3):219.82
Assumed particle density (g/cm3):2.70
Gravimetric Moisture Content (% g/g):24.4
Volumetric Moisture Content (% vol):34.6
Dry bulk density (g/cm3):1.42
Wet bulk density (g/cm3):1.76
Calculated Porosity (% vol):47.6
Percent Saturation:72.7
Laboratory analysis by:D. O'Dowd
Data entered by:D. O'Dowd
Checked by:J. Hines
Comments:
* Weight including tares
NA = Not applicable
--- = This sample was not remolded
12
Data for Initial Moisture Content,
Bulk Density, Porosity, and Percent Saturation
Job Name:Engineering Analytics, Inc.
Job Number:DB23.1131.00
Sample Number:EA-TP4 (95%)
Project Number:110444
Project Name:Shootering Closure Design
As Received Remolded
Test Date:NA 28-Apr-23
Field weight* of sample (g):581.13
Tare weight, ring (g):138.07
Tare weight, pan/plate (g):0.00
Tare weight, other (g):0.00
Dry weight of sample (g):384.85
Sample volume (cm3):222.33
Assumed particle density (g/cm3):2.70
Gravimetric Moisture Content (% g/g):15.1
Volumetric Moisture Content (% vol):26.2
Dry bulk density (g/cm3):1.73
Wet bulk density (g/cm3):1.99
Calculated Porosity (% vol):35.9
Percent Saturation:73.0
Laboratory analysis by:D. O'Dowd
Data entered by:D. O'Dowd
Checked by:J. Hines
Comments:
* Weight including tares
NA = Not applicable
--- = This sample was not remolded
13
Data for Initial Moisture Content,
Bulk Density, Porosity, and Percent Saturation
Job Name:Engineering Analytics, Inc.
Job Number:DB23.1131.00
Sample Number:EA-TP6 (95%)
Project Number:110444
Project Name:Shootering Closure Design
As Received Remolded
Test Date:NA 28-Apr-23
Field weight* of sample (g):509.10
Tare weight, ring (g):137.91
Tare weight, pan/plate (g):0.00
Tare weight, other (g):0.00
Dry weight of sample (g):285.85
Sample volume (cm3):221.73
Assumed particle density (g/cm3):2.75
Gravimetric Moisture Content (% g/g):29.9
Volumetric Moisture Content (% vol):38.5
Dry bulk density (g/cm3):1.29
Wet bulk density (g/cm3):1.67
Calculated Porosity (% vol):53.1
Percent Saturation:72.5
Laboratory analysis by:D. O'Dowd
Data entered by:D. O'Dowd
Checked by:J. Hines
Comments:
* Weight including tares
NA = Not applicable
--- = This sample was not remolded
14
Data for Initial Moisture Content,
Bulk Density, Porosity, and Percent Saturation
Job Name:Engineering Analytics, Inc.
Job Number:DB23.1131.00
Sample Number:EA-TP8 (95%)
Project Number:110444
Project Name:Shootering Closure Design
As Received Remolded
Test Date:NA 28-Apr-23
Field weight* of sample (g):538.55
Tare weight, ring (g):136.69
Tare weight, pan/plate (g):0.00
Tare weight, other (g):0.00
Dry weight of sample (g):318.47
Sample volume (cm3):220.50
Assumed particle density (g/cm3):2.75
Gravimetric Moisture Content (% g/g):26.2
Volumetric Moisture Content (% vol):37.8
Dry bulk density (g/cm3):1.44
Wet bulk density (g/cm3):1.82
Calculated Porosity (% vol):47.5
Percent Saturation:79.6
Laboratory analysis by:D. O'Dowd
Data entered by:D. O'Dowd
Checked by:J. Hines
Comments:
* Weight including tares
NA = Not applicable
--- = This sample was not remolded
15
Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity
16
Job Name:Eng. Analytics (4-23)
Job Number:DB23.1131.00
Sample Number:EA-TP3 (95%)
Project:NA
Job Number:NA
Initial Mass (g):387.02 Saturated Mass (g):426.34 Permeant liquid used:Tap Water
Diameter (cm):6.087 Dry Mass (g):307.7 Sample Preparation:
Length (cm):7.566 Diameter (cm):6.233
Area (cm 2 ):29.10 Length (cm):7.649 Number of Lifts:3
Volume (cm 3 ):220.17 Deformation (%)**:1.09 Split:#4
Dry Density (g/cm 3 ):1.40 Area (cm 2 ):30.51 Percent Coarse Material (%):0.0
Dry Density (pcf):87.2 Volume (cm 3 ):233.40 Particle Density(g/cm 3 ):2.7
Water Content (%, g/g):25.8 Dry Density (g/cm 3 ):1.32 Cell pressure (PSI):83.0
Water Content (%, vol):36.0 Dry Density (pcf):82.3 Influent pressure (PSI):80.0
Void Ratio (e):0.93 Water Content (%, g/g):38.6 Effluent pressure (PSI):80.0
Porosity (%, vol):48.2 Water Content (%, vol):50.8 Panel Used:
Saturation (%):74.7 Void Ratio(e):1.05 Reading:
Porosity (%, vol):51.2 Date/Time
Saturation (%)*:99.3 B-Value (% saturation) prior to test*: 0.98 6/7/23 1425
B-Value (% saturation) post to test: 0.99 6/12/23 800
* Per ASTM D5084 percent saturation is ensured (B-Value ≥ 95%) prior to testing, as post test saturation values may be exaggerated during depressurizing and sample removal.
**Percent Deformation: based on initial sample length and post permeation sample length.
Laboratory analysis by:D. O'Dowd
Data entered by:D. O'Dowd
Checked by:J. Hines
Post Permeation
Sample Properties
Remolded or Initial
Sample Properties
Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity
Flexible Wall Falling Head-Rising Tail Method
Test and Sample Conditions
D E F
Annulus Pipette
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
In situ sample, extruded
Remolded Sample
Assumed Measured
17
Job Name:Eng. Analytics (4-23)
Job Number:DB23.1131.00
Sample Number:EA-TP3 (95%)
Project:NA
Job Number:NA
Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity
Flexible Wall Falling Head-Rising Tail Method
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
Date Time
Temp
(°C)
Influent
Pipette
Reading
Effluent
Pipette
Reading
Gradient
(ΔH/ΔL)
Average
Flow (cm3)
Elapsed
Time (s)
Ratio
(outflow to
inflow)
Change in
Head (Not to
exceed 25%)
ksat T°C
(cm/s)
ksat Corrected
(cm/s)
Test # 1:
08-Jun-23 06:39:40 21.1 2.10 23.90 3.29
09-Jun-23 06:36:43 21.2 2.30 23.70 3.23
Test # 2:
09-Jun-23 06:36:43 21.2 2.30 23.70 3.23
10-Jun-23 06:39:01 21.0 2.50 23.50 3.17
Test # 3:
10-Jun-23 06:39:01 21.0 2.50 23.50 3.17
11-Jun-23 07:06:05 21.2 2.70 23.30 3.11
Test # 4:
11-Jun-23 07:06:05 21.2 2.70 23.30 3.11
12-Jun-23 07:44:20 21.6 2.90 23.10 3.05
Average Ksat (cm/sec):2.31E-08
Calculated Gravel Corrected Average Ksat (cm/sec):NA
ASTM Required Range (+/- 25%)
Ksat (-25%) (cm/s):1.73E-08
Ksat (+25%) (cm/s):2.89E-08
0.17 86223 1.00 2% 2.34E-08 2.28E-08
2.37E-08 2.31E-08
0.17 88024
0.17 86538 1.00 2%
1.00 2% 2.38E-08 2.32E-08
2.41E-08 2.33E-081.00 2%0.17 88695
1.5E-08
1.7E-08
1.9E-08
2.1E-08
2.3E-08
2.5E-08
2.7E-08
2.9E-08
3.1E-08
40000 90000 140000 190000 240000 290000 340000 390000
Ks
a
t

(
c
m
/
s
)
Time (s)
18
Job Name:Eng. Analytics (4-23)
Job Number:DB23.1131.00
Sample Number:EA-TP4 (95%)
Project:NA
Job Number:NA
Initial Mass (g):442.21 Saturated Mass (g):465.02 Permeant liquid used:Tap Water
Diameter (cm):6.098 Dry Mass (g):383.95 Sample Preparation:
Length (cm):7.595 Diameter (cm):6.105
Area (cm 2 ):29.21 Length (cm):7.609 Number of Lifts:3
Volume (cm 3 ):221.82 Deformation (%)**:0.18 Split:#4
Dry Density (g/cm 3 ):1.73 Area (cm 2 ):29.27 Percent Coarse Material (%):0.0
Dry Density (pcf):108.1 Volume (cm 3 ):222.72 Particle Density(g/cm 3 ):2.7
Water Content (%, g/g):15.2 Dry Density (g/cm 3 ):1.72 Cell pressure (PSI):83.0
Water Content (%, vol):26.3 Dry Density (pcf):107.6 Influent pressure (PSI):80.0
Void Ratio (e):0.56 Water Content (%, g/g):21.1 Effluent pressure (PSI):80.0
Porosity (%, vol):35.9 Water Content (%, vol):36.4 Panel Used:
Saturation (%):73.2 Void Ratio(e):0.57 Reading:
Porosity (%, vol):36.2 Date/Time
Saturation (%)*:100.7 B-Value (% saturation) prior to test*: 1.00 6/7/23 1425
B-Value (% saturation) post to test: 1.00 6/9/23 945
* Per ASTM D5084 percent saturation is ensured (B-Value ≥ 95%) prior to testing, as post test saturation values may be exaggerated during depressurizing and sample removal.
**Percent Deformation: based on initial sample length and post permeation sample length.
Laboratory analysis by:D. O'Dowd
Data entered by:D. O'Dowd
Checked by:J. Hines
Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity
Flexible Wall Falling Head-Rising Tail Method
Remolded or Initial
Sample Properties
Post Permeation
Sample Properties Test and Sample Conditions
D E F
Annulus Pipette
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
In situ sample, extruded
Remolded Sample
Assumed Measured
19
Job Name:Eng. Analytics (4-23)
Job Number:DB23.1131.00
Sample Number:EA-TP4 (95%)
Project:NA
Job Number:NA
Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity
Flexible Wall Falling Head-Rising Tail Method
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
Date Time
Temp
(°C)
Influent
Pipette
Reading
Effluent
Pipette
Reading
Gradient
(ΔH/ΔL)
Average
Flow (cm3)
Elapsed
Time (s)
Ratio
(outflow to
inflow)
Change in
Head (Not to
exceed 25%)
ksat T°C
(cm/s)
ksat Corrected
(cm/s)
Test # 1:
08-Jun-23 08:11:21 21.0 2.90 23.10 3.07
08-Jun-23 09:34:45 21.0 3.30 22.70 2.94
Test # 2:
08-Jun-23 09:34:45 21.0 3.30 22.70 2.94
08-Jun-23 10:31:49 21.0 3.55 22.45 2.87
Test # 3:
08-Jun-23 10:31:49 21.0 3.55 22.45 2.87
08-Jun-23 11:30:25 21.0 3.80 22.20 2.79
Test # 4:
09-Jun-23 06:35:00 21.0 3.80 22.45 2.83
09-Jun-23 07:46:21 21.0 4.10 22.15 2.74
Average Ksat (cm/sec):8.55E-07
Calculated Gravel Corrected Average Ksat (cm/sec):NA
ASTM Required Range (+/- 25%)
Ksat (-25%) (cm/s):6.41E-07
Ksat (+25%) (cm/s):1.07E-06
0.35 5004 1.00 4% 9.12E-07 8.91E-07
0.22 3424 1.00 3% 8.61E-07 8.42E-07
0.22 3516 1.00 3% 8.61E-07 8.42E-07
0.26 4281 1.00 3% 8.63E-07 8.43E-07
6.0E-07
7.0E-07
8.0E-07
9.0E-07
1.0E-06
1.1E-06
2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000
Ks
a
t

(
c
m
/
s
)
Time (s)
20
Job Name:Eng. Analytics (4-23)
Job Number:DB23.1131.00
Sample Number:EA-TP6 (95%)
Project:NA
Job Number:NA
Initial Mass (g):370.21 Saturated Mass (g):426.21 Permeant liquid used:Tap Water
Diameter (cm):6.101 Dry Mass (g):287.8 Sample Preparation:
Length (cm):7.600 Diameter (cm):6.242
Area (cm 2 ):29.23 Length (cm):7.814 Number of Lifts:3
Volume (cm 3 ):222.18 Deformation (%)**:2.74 Split:#4
Dry Density (g/cm 3 ):1.30 Area (cm 2 ):30.60 Percent Coarse Material (%):0.0
Dry Density (pcf):80.9 Volume (cm 3 ):239.12 Particle Density(g/cm 3 ):2.75
Water Content (%, g/g):28.6 Dry Density (g/cm 3 ):1.20 Cell pressure (PSI):83.0
Water Content (%, vol):37.1 Dry Density (pcf):75.1 Influent pressure (PSI):80.0
Void Ratio (e):1.12 Water Content (%, g/g):48.1 Effluent pressure (PSI):80.0
Porosity (%, vol):52.9 Water Content (%, vol):57.9 Panel Used:
Saturation (%):70.1 Void Ratio(e):1.28 Reading:
Porosity (%, vol):56.2 Date/Time
Saturation (%)*:102.9 B-Value (% saturation) prior to test*: 1.00 6/7/23 1350
B-Value (% saturation) post to test: 1.00 6/12/23 806
* Per ASTM D5084 percent saturation is ensured (B-Value ≥ 95%) prior to testing, as post test saturation values may be exaggerated during depressurizing and sample removal.
**Percent Deformation: based on initial sample length and post permeation sample length.
Laboratory analysis by:D. O'Dowd
Data entered by:D. O'Dowd
Checked by:J. Hines
Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity
Flexible Wall Falling Head-Rising Tail Method
Remolded or Initial
Sample Properties
Post Permeation
Sample Properties Test and Sample Conditions
O P Q
Annulus Pipette
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
In situ sample, extruded
Remolded Sample
Assumed Measured
21
Job Name:Eng. Analytics (4-23)
Job Number:DB23.1131.00
Sample Number:EA-TP6 (95%)
Project:NA
Job Number:NA
Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity
Flexible Wall Falling Head-Rising Tail Method
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
Date Time
Temp
(°C)
Influent
Pipette
Reading
Effluent
Pipette
Reading
Gradient
(ΔH/ΔL)
Average
Flow (cm3)
Elapsed
Time (s)
Ratio
(outflow to
inflow)
Change in
Head (Not to
exceed 25%)
ksat T°C
(cm/s)
ksat Corrected
(cm/s)
Test # 1:
08-Jun-23 06:40:36 21.1 2.40 23.60 3.13
09-Jun-23 06:29:30 21.2 3.00 23.00 2.96
Test # 2:
09-Jun-23 06:29:30 21.2 3.00 23.00 2.96
10-Jun-23 06:41:00 21.0 3.60 22.40 2.78
Test # 3:
10-Jun-23 06:41:00 21.0 3.60 22.40 2.78
11-Jun-23 07:07:15 21.2 4.20 21.80 2.60
Test # 4:
11-Jun-23 07:07:15 21.2 4.20 21.80 2.60
12-Jun-23 07:45:26 21.6 4.75 21.25 2.44
Average Ksat (cm/sec):7.74E-08
Calculated Gravel Corrected Average Ksat (cm/sec):NA
ASTM Required Range (+/- 25%)
Ksat (-25%) (cm/s):5.80E-08
Ksat (+25%) (cm/s):9.67E-08
0.52 85734 1.00 6% 7.54E-08 7.34E-08
0.52 87090 1.00 6% 7.88E-08 7.68E-08
0.52 87975 1.00 6% 8.32E-08 8.11E-08
0.48 88691 1.00 6% 8.07E-08 7.81E-08
5.0E-08
6.0E-08
7.0E-08
8.0E-08
9.0E-08
1.0E-07
40000 90000 140000 190000 240000 290000 340000 390000
Ks
a
t

(
c
m
/
s
)
Time (s)
22
Job Name:Eng. Analytics (4-23)
Job Number:DB23.1131.00
Sample Number:EA-TP8 (95%)
Project:NA
Job Number:NA
Initial Mass (g):401.31 Saturated Mass (g):432.00 Permeant liquid used:Tap Water
Diameter (cm):6.103 Dry Mass (g):318.51 Sample Preparation:
Length (cm):7.563 Diameter (cm):6.122
Area (cm 2 ):29.25 Length (cm):7.626 Number of Lifts:3
Volume (cm 3 ):221.24 Deformation (%)**:0.83 Split:#4
Dry Density (g/cm 3 ):1.44 Area (cm 2 ):29.44 Percent Coarse Material (%):0.0
Dry Density (pcf):89.9 Volume (cm 3 ):224.49 Particle Density(g/cm 3 ):2.75
Water Content (%, g/g):26.0 Dry Density (g/cm 3 ):1.42 Cell pressure (PSI):83.0
Water Content (%, vol):37.4 Dry Density (pcf):88.6 Influent pressure (PSI):80.0
Void Ratio (e):0.91 Water Content (%, g/g):35.6 Effluent pressure (PSI):80.0
Porosity (%, vol):47.6 Water Content (%, vol):50.6 Panel Used:
Saturation (%):78.5 Void Ratio(e):0.94 Reading:
Porosity (%, vol):48.4 Date/Time
Saturation (%)*:104.4 B-Value (% saturation) prior to test*: 0.99 6/7/23 1353
B-Value (% saturation) post to test: 0.99 6/9/23 1005
* Per ASTM D5084 percent saturation is ensured (B-Value ≥ 95%) prior to testing, as post test saturation values may be exaggerated during depressurizing and sample removal.
**Percent Deformation: based on initial sample length and post permeation sample length.
Laboratory analysis by:D. O'Dowd
Data entered by:D. O'Dowd
Checked by:J. Hines
Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity
Flexible Wall Falling Head-Rising Tail Method
Remolded or Initial
Sample Properties
Post Permeation
Sample Properties Test and Sample Conditions
O P Q
Annulus Pipette
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
In situ sample, extruded
Remolded Sample
Assumed Measured
In situ sample, extruded
Remolded Sample
23
Job Name:Eng. Analytics (4-23)
Job Number:DB23.1131.00
Sample Number:EA-TP8 (95%)
Project:NA
Job Number:NA
Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity
Flexible Wall Falling Head-Rising Tail Method
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
Date Time
Temp
(°C)
Influent
Pipette
Reading
Effluent
Pipette
Reading
Gradient
(ΔH/ΔL)
Average
Flow (cm3)
Elapsed
Time (s)
Ratio
(outflow to
inflow)
Change in
Head (Not to
exceed 25%)
ksat T°C
(cm/s)
ksat Corrected
(cm/s)
Test # 1:
08-Jun-23 09:34:14 21.0 4.20 21.80 2.66
08-Jun-23 10:32:14 21.0 4.55 21.45 2.56
Test # 2:
08-Jun-23 10:32:14 21.0 4.55 21.45 2.56
08-Jun-23 11:30:59 21.0 4.85 21.15 2.47
Test # 3:
09-Jun-23 06:38:30 21.0 4.85 21.15 2.47
09-Jun-23 07:50:10 21.0 5.20 20.80 2.36
Test # 4:
09-Jun-23 07:50:10 21.0 5.20 20.80 2.36
09-Jun-23 08:55:13 20.9 5.50 20.50 2.27
Average Ksat (cm/sec):1.16E-06
Calculated Gravel Corrected Average Ksat (cm/sec):NA
ASTM Required Range (+/- 25%)
Ksat (-25%) (cm/s):8.70E-07
Ksat (+25%) (cm/s):1.45E-06
0.30 3480 1.00 4% 1.31E-06 1.28E-06
0.26 3525 1.00 4% 1.15E-06 1.13E-06
0.30 4300 1.00 4% 1.15E-06 1.12E-06
0.26 3903 1.00 4% 1.13E-06 1.11E-06
8.0E-07
9.0E-07
1.0E-06
1.1E-06
1.2E-06
1.3E-06
1.4E-06
1.5E-06
1000 3000 5000 7000 9000 11000 13000 15000 17000
Ks
a
t

(
c
m
/
s
)
Time (s)
24
Moisture Retention Characteristics
25
Moisture Retention Data
Hanging Column / Pressure Plate
(Soil-Water Characteristic Curve)
Job Name:Engineering Analytics, Inc.Dry wt. of sample (g):311.13
Job Number:DB23.1131.00 Tare wt., ring (g):137.38
Sample Number:EA-TP3 (95%)Tare wt., screen & clamp (g):24.18
Project Number:110444 Initial sample volume (cm3):219.82
Project Name:Shootering Closure Design Initial dry bulk density (g/cm3):1.42
Assumed particle density (g/cm3):2.70
Initial calculated total porosity (%):47.58
Matric Moisture
Weight*Potential Content †
Date Time (g)(-cm water)(% vol)
Hanging column:3-May-23 8:00 586.40 0 49.47 ‡‡
10-May-23 17:00 586.63 64.3 48.61 ‡‡
17-May-23 16:40 583.58 148.8 47.31 ‡‡
Pressure plate:27-May-23 8:00 583.35 337 47.31 ‡‡
12-Jun-23 14:40 582.40 1530 46.90 ‡‡
Volume Adjusted Data 1
Adjusted
Matric Adjusted % Volume Adjusted Calculated
Potential Volume Change 2 Density Porosity
(-cm water)(cm3)(%)(g/cm3)(%)
Hanging column:0.0 229.86 +4.56%1.35 49.87
64.3 234.39 +6.63%1.33 50.84
148.8 234.39 +6.63%1.33 50.84
Pressure plate:337 233.93 +6.42%1.33 50.74
1530 233.93 +6.42%1.33 50.74
Comments:
1
2
*Weight including tares
†Assumed density of water is 1.0 g/cm3
‡‡
Technician Notes:
Laboratory analysis by:D. O'Dowd
Data entered by:J. Hines
Checked by:J. Hines
Represents percent volume change from original sample volume. A '+' denotes measured sample swelling, a '-' denotes measured sample
settling, and '---' denotes no volume change occurred.
Applicable if the sample experienced volume changes during testing. ‘Volume Adjusted’ values represent each of the volume change
measurements obtained after saturated hydraulic conductivity testing and throughout hanging column/pressure plate testing. "---" indicates
no volume changes occurred.
Volume adjustments are applicable at this matric potential (see comment #1). Changes in volume, if applicable, are estimated based on
obtainable measurements of changes in sample length and diameter.
26
Moisture Retention Data
Dew Point Potentiometer / Relative Humidity Box
(Soil-Water Characteristic Curve)
Sample Number:EA-TP3 (95%)
Initial sample bulk density (g/cm3):1.42
Fraction of bulk sample used (<2.00mm fraction) (%):99.80
Dry weight* of dew point potentiometer sample (g):184.03
Tare weight, jar (g):117.01
Weight*Water Potential Moisture Content †
Date Time (g)(-cm water)(% vol)
Dew point potentiometer:13-Jun-23 16:40 200.05 14685 31.72 ‡‡
12-Jun-23 11:59 196.15 54457 24.01 ‡‡
8-Jun-23 16:50 193.08 174590 17.92 ‡‡
8-Jun-23 9:42 190.79 533151 13.39 ‡‡
Volume Adjusted Data 1
Water Adjusted % Volume Adjusted Adjusted
Potential Volume Change 2 Density Calc. Porosity
(-cm water)(cm3)(%)(g/cm3)(%)
Dew point potentiometer:14685 233.93 +6.42%1.33 50.74
54457 233.93 +6.42%1.33 50.74
174590 233.93 +6.42%1.33 50.74
533151 233.93 +6.42%1.33 50.74
Comments:
1
2
*Weight including tares
†
‡‡Volume adjustments are applicable at this matric potential (see comment #1).
Laboratory analysis by:L. Thurgood
Data entered by:J. Hines
Checked by:J. Hines
Applicable if the sample experienced volume changes during testing. ‘Volume Adjusted’ values represent the volume change measurements
obtained after the last hanging column or pressure plate point. "---" indicates no volume changes occurred.
Represents percent volume change from original sample volume. A '+' denotes measured sample swelling, a '-' denotes measured sample
settling, and '---' denotes no volume change occurred.
Adjusted for >2.00mm (#10 sieve) material not used in DPP/RH testing. Assumed moisture content of material >2.00mm is zero, and
assumed density of water is 1.0 g/cm3.
27
Moisture Retention Data
Dew Point Potentiometer / Relative Humidity Box
(Soil-Water Characteristic Curve)
Sample Number:EA-TP3 (95%)
Initial sample bulk density (g/cm3):1.42
Fraction of bulk sample used (<2.00mm fraction) (%):99.80
Dry weight* of relative humidity box sample (g):79.82
Tare weight (g):49.81
Weight*Water Potential Moisture Content †
Date Time (g)(-cm water)(% vol)
Relative humidity box:13-Jun-23 17:15 82.43 852439 11.53 ‡‡
Volume Adjusted Data 1
Water Adjusted % Volume Adjusted Adjusted
Potential Volume Change 2 Density Calc. Porosity
(-cm water)(cm3)(%)(g/cm3)(%)
Relative humidity box:852439 233.93 +6.42%1.33 50.74
Comments:
1
2
*Weight including tares
†
‡‡
Laboratory analysis by:L. Thurgood
Data entered by:J. Hines
Checked by:J. Hines
Volume adjustments are applicable at this matric potential (see comment #1). Changes in volume, if applicable, are estimated based on
obtainable measurements of changes in sample length and diameter.
Applicable if the sample experienced volume changes during testing. ‘Volume Adjusted’ values represent the volume change measurements
obtained after the last hanging column or pressure plate point. "---" indicates no volume changes occurred.
Represents percent volume change from original sample volume. A '+' denotes measured sample swelling, a '-' denotes measured sample
settling, and '---' denotes no volume change occurred.
Adjusted for >2.00mm (#10 sieve) material not used in DPP/RH testing. Assumed moisture content of material >2.00mm is zero, and
assumed density of water is 1.0 g/cm3.
28
Water Retention Data Points
Sample Number: EA-TP3 (95%)
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+06
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Pr
e
s
s
u
r
e

H
e
a
d

(
-cm

w
a
t
e
r
)
Moisture Content (%,cm3/cm3)
Hanging column
Pressure plate
Dew point potentiometer
Rh box
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
29
Predicted Water Retention Curve and Data Points
Sample Number: EA-TP3 (95%)
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+06
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Pr
e
s
s
u
r
e

H
e
a
d

(
-cm

w
a
t
e
r
)
Moisture Content (%,cm3/cm3)
Hanging column
Pressure plate
Dew point potentiometer
Rh box
Predicted curve
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
30
Plot of Relative Hydraulic Conductivity vs Moisture Content
Sample Number: EA-TP3 (95%)
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Re
l
a
t
i
v
e

H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
Moisture Content (%,cm3/cm3)
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
31
Plot of Hydraulic Conductivity vs Moisture Content
Sample Number: EA-TP3 (95%)
1.E-12
1.E-11
1.E-10
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Hy
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y

(
c
m
/
s
)
Moisture Content (%,cm3/cm3)
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
32
Plot of Relative Hydraulic Conductivity vs Pressure Head
Sample Number: EA-TP3 (95%)
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 1.E+01 1.E+02 1.E+03 1.E+04 1.E+05 1.E+06
Re
l
a
t
i
v
e

H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
Pressure Head (-cm water)
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
33
Plot of Hydraulic Conductivity vs Pressure Head
Sample Number: EA-TP3 (95%)
1.E-12
1.E-11
1.E-10
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 1.E+01 1.E+02 1.E+03 1.E+04 1.E+05 1.E+06
Hy
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y

(
c
m
/
s
)
Pressure Head (-cm water)
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
34
Moisture Retention Data
Hanging Column / Pressure Plate
(Soil-Water Characteristic Curve)
Job Name:Engineering Analytics, Inc.Dry wt. of sample (g):384.85
Job Number:DB23.1131.00 Tare wt., ring (g):138.07
Sample Number:EA-TP4 (95%)Tare wt., screen & clamp (g):25.98
Project Number:110444 Initial sample volume (cm3):222.33
Project Name:Shootering Closure Design Initial dry bulk density (g/cm3):1.73
Assumed particle density (g/cm3):2.70
Initial calculated total porosity (%):35.89
Matric Moisture
Weight*Potential Content †
Date Time (g)(-cm water)(% vol)
Hanging column:3-May-23 8:10 629.30 0 36.16
10-May-23 16:30 629.49 24.3 36.25
17-May-23 17:00 625.31 74.8 34.37
25-May-23 7:40 619.46 152.0 31.74
Pressure plate:5-Jun-23 8:00 615.85 337 30.11
Volume Adjusted Data 1
Adjusted
Matric Adjusted % Volume Adjusted Calculated
Potential Volume Change 2 Density Porosity
(-cm water)(cm3)(%)(g/cm3)(%)
Hanging column:0.0 ------------
24.3 ------------
74.8 ------------
152.0 ------------
Pressure plate:337 ------------
Comments:
1
2
*Weight including tares
†Assumed density of water is 1.0 g/cm3
‡‡
Technician Notes:
Laboratory analysis by:D. O'Dowd
Data entered by:J. Hines
Checked by:J. Hines
Represents percent volume change from original sample volume. A '+' denotes measured sample swelling, a '-' denotes measured sample
settling, and '---' denotes no volume change occurred.
Applicable if the sample experienced volume changes during testing. ‘Volume Adjusted’ values represent each of the volume change
measurements obtained after saturated hydraulic conductivity testing and throughout hanging column/pressure plate testing. "---" indicates
no volume changes occurred.
Volume adjustments are applicable at this matric potential (see comment #1). Changes in volume, if applicable, are estimated based on
obtainable measurements of changes in sample length and diameter.
35
Moisture Retention Data
Dew Point Potentiometer / Relative Humidity Box
(Soil-Water Characteristic Curve)
Sample Number:EA-TP4 (95%)
Initial sample bulk density (g/cm3):1.73
Fraction of bulk sample used (<2.00mm fraction) (%):90.89
Dry weight* of dew point potentiometer sample (g):163.94
Tare weight, jar (g):114.65
Weight*Water Potential Moisture Content †
Date Time (g)(-cm water)(% vol)
Dew point potentiometer:13-Jun-23 11:20 168.86 26719 15.70
12-Jun-23 11:50 167.81 85969 12.36
8-Jun-23 16:45 167.10 193150 10.07
8-Jun-23 9:55 166.44 472065 7.99
Volume Adjusted Data 1
Water Adjusted % Volume Adjusted Adjusted
Potential Volume Change 2 Density Calc. Porosity
(-cm water)(cm3)(%)(g/cm3)(%)
Dew point potentiometer:26719 ------------
85969 ------------
193150 ------------
472065 ------------
Comments:
1
2
*Weight including tares
†
‡‡Volume adjustments are applicable at this matric potential (see comment #1).
Laboratory analysis by:L. Thurgood
Data entered by:J. Hines
Checked by:J. Hines
Applicable if the sample experienced volume changes during testing. ‘Volume Adjusted’ values represent the volume change measurements
obtained after the last hanging column or pressure plate point. "---" indicates no volume changes occurred.
Represents percent volume change from original sample volume. A '+' denotes measured sample swelling, a '-' denotes measured sample
settling, and '---' denotes no volume change occurred.
Adjusted for >2.00mm (#10 sieve) material not used in DPP/RH testing. Assumed moisture content of material >2.00mm is zero, and
assumed density of water is 1.0 g/cm3.
36
Moisture Retention Data
Dew Point Potentiometer / Relative Humidity Box
(Soil-Water Characteristic Curve)
Sample Number:EA-TP4 (95%)
Initial sample bulk density (g/cm3):1.73
Fraction of bulk sample used (<2.00mm fraction) (%):90.89
Dry weight* of relative humidity box sample (g):80.68
Tare weight (g):42.47
Weight*Water Potential Moisture Content †
Date Time (g)(-cm water)(% vol)
Relative humidity box:13-Jun-23 17:15 82.24 852439 6.42
Volume Adjusted Data 1
Water Adjusted % Volume Adjusted Adjusted
Potential Volume Change 2 Density Calc. Porosity
(-cm water)(cm3)(%)(g/cm3)(%)
Relative humidity box:852439 ------------
Comments:
1
2
*Weight including tares
†
‡‡
Laboratory analysis by:L. Thurgood
Data entered by:J. Hines
Checked by:J. Hines
Volume adjustments are applicable at this matric potential (see comment #1). Changes in volume, if applicable, are estimated based on
obtainable measurements of changes in sample length and diameter.
Applicable if the sample experienced volume changes during testing. ‘Volume Adjusted’ values represent the volume change measurements
obtained after the last hanging column or pressure plate point. "---" indicates no volume changes occurred.
Represents percent volume change from original sample volume. A '+' denotes measured sample swelling, a '-' denotes measured sample
settling, and '---' denotes no volume change occurred.
Adjusted for >2.00mm (#10 sieve) material not used in DPP/RH testing. Assumed moisture content of material >2.00mm is zero, and
assumed density of water is 1.0 g/cm3.
37
Water Retention Data Points
Sample Number: EA-TP4 (95%)
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+06
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Pr
e
s
s
u
r
e

H
e
a
d

(
-cm

w
a
t
e
r
)
Moisture Content (%,cm3/cm3)
Hanging column
Pressure plate
Dew point potentiometer
Rh box
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
38
Predicted Water Retention Curve and Data Points
Sample Number: EA-TP4 (95%)
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+06
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Pr
e
s
s
u
r
e

H
e
a
d

(
-cm

w
a
t
e
r
)
Moisture Content (%,cm3/cm3)
Hanging column
Pressure plate
Dew point potentiometer
Rh box
Predicted curve
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
39
Plot of Relative Hydraulic Conductivity vs Moisture Content
Sample Number: EA-TP4 (95%)
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Re
l
a
t
i
v
e

H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
Moisture Content (%,cm3/cm3)
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
40
Plot of Hydraulic Conductivity vs Moisture Content
Sample Number: EA-TP4 (95%)
1.E-12
1.E-11
1.E-10
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Hy
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y

(
c
m
/
s
)
Moisture Content (%,cm3/cm3)
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
41
Plot of Relative Hydraulic Conductivity vs Pressure Head
Sample Number: EA-TP4 (95%)
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 1.E+01 1.E+02 1.E+03 1.E+04 1.E+05 1.E+06
Re
l
a
t
i
v
e

H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
Pressure Head (-cm water)
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
42
Plot of Hydraulic Conductivity vs Pressure Head
Sample Number: EA-TP4 (95%)
1.E-12
1.E-11
1.E-10
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 1.E+01 1.E+02 1.E+03 1.E+04 1.E+05 1.E+06
Hy
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y

(
c
m
/
s
)
Pressure Head (-cm water)
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
43
Moisture Retention Data
Hanging Column / Pressure Plate
(Soil-Water Characteristic Curve)
Job Name:Engineering Analytics, Inc.Dry wt. of sample (g):285.85
Job Number:DB23.1131.00 Tare wt., ring (g):137.91
Sample Number:EA-TP6 (95%)Tare wt., screen & clamp (g):26.53
Project Number:110444 Initial sample volume (cm3):221.73
Project Name:Shootering Closure Design Initial dry bulk density (g/cm3):1.29
Assumed particle density (g/cm3):2.75
Initial calculated total porosity (%):53.12
Matric Moisture
Weight*Potential Content †
Date Time (g)(-cm water)(% vol)
Hanging column:3-May-23 8:15 577.27 0 55.25 ‡‡
10-May-23 17:00 583.83 64.3 56.08 ‡‡
17-May-23 16:40 583.60 148.8 55.98 ‡‡
Pressure plate:27-May-23 8:00 583.17 337 55.80 ‡‡
12-Jun-23 14:40 582.70 1530 55.60 ‡‡
Volume Adjusted Data 1
Adjusted
Matric Adjusted % Volume Adjusted Calculated
Potential Volume Change 2 Density Porosity
(-cm water)(cm3)(%)(g/cm3)(%)
Hanging column:0.0 229.84 +3.66%1.24 54.78
64.3 238.13 +7.40%1.20 56.35
148.8 238.13 +7.40%1.20 56.35
Pressure plate:337 238.13 +7.40%1.20 56.35
1530 238.13 +7.40%1.20 56.35
Comments:
1
2
*Weight including tares
†Assumed density of water is 1.0 g/cm3
‡‡
Technician Notes:
Laboratory analysis by:D. O'Dowd
Data entered by:J. Hines
Checked by:J. Hines
Represents percent volume change from original sample volume. A '+' denotes measured sample swelling, a '-' denotes measured sample
settling, and '---' denotes no volume change occurred.
Applicable if the sample experienced volume changes during testing. ‘Volume Adjusted’ values represent each of the volume change
measurements obtained after saturated hydraulic conductivity testing and throughout hanging column/pressure plate testing. "---" indicates
no volume changes occurred.
Volume adjustments are applicable at this matric potential (see comment #1). Changes in volume, if applicable, are estimated based on
obtainable measurements of changes in sample length and diameter.
44
Moisture Retention Data
Dew Point Potentiometer / Relative Humidity Box
(Soil-Water Characteristic Curve)
Sample Number:EA-TP6 (95%)
Initial sample bulk density (g/cm3):1.29
Fraction of bulk sample used (<2.00mm fraction) (%):100.00
Dry weight* of dew point potentiometer sample (g):171.68
Tare weight, jar (g):116.54
Weight*Water Potential Moisture Content †
Date Time (g)(-cm water)(% vol)
Dew point potentiometer:13-Jun-23 16:50 187.02 15297 33.39 ‡‡
12-Jun-23 11:45 182.59 47625 23.74 ‡‡
8-Jun-23 16:45 179.65 195904 17.36 ‡‡
7-Jun-23 15:40 178.07 592708 13.90 ‡‡
Volume Adjusted Data 1
Water Adjusted % Volume Adjusted Adjusted
Potential Volume Change 2 Density Calc. Porosity
(-cm water)(cm3)(%)(g/cm3)(%)
Dew point potentiometer:15297 238.13 +7.40%1.20 56.35
47625 238.13 +7.40%1.20 56.35
195904 238.13 +7.40%1.20 56.35
592708 238.13 +7.40%1.20 56.35
Comments:
1
2
*Weight including tares
†
‡‡Volume adjustments are applicable at this matric potential (see comment #1).
Laboratory analysis by:L. Thurgood
Data entered by:J. Hines
Checked by:J. Hines
Applicable if the sample experienced volume changes during testing. ‘Volume Adjusted’ values represent the volume change measurements
obtained after the last hanging column or pressure plate point. "---" indicates no volume changes occurred.
Represents percent volume change from original sample volume. A '+' denotes measured sample swelling, a '-' denotes measured sample
settling, and '---' denotes no volume change occurred.
Adjusted for >2.00mm (#10 sieve) material not used in DPP/RH testing. Assumed moisture content of material >2.00mm is zero, and
assumed density of water is 1.0 g/cm3.
45
Moisture Retention Data
Dew Point Potentiometer / Relative Humidity Box
(Soil-Water Characteristic Curve)
Sample Number:EA-TP6 (95%)
Initial sample bulk density (g/cm3):1.29
Fraction of bulk sample used (<2.00mm fraction) (%):100.00
Dry weight* of relative humidity box sample (g):86.61
Tare weight (g):44.09
Weight*Water Potential Moisture Content †
Date Time (g)(-cm water)(% vol)
Relative humidity box:13-Jun-23 17:15 91.13 852439 12.76 ‡‡
Volume Adjusted Data 1
Water Adjusted % Volume Adjusted Adjusted
Potential Volume Change 2 Density Calc. Porosity
(-cm water)(cm3)(%)(g/cm3)(%)
Relative humidity box:852439 238.13 +7.40%1.20 56.35
Comments:
1
2
*Weight including tares
†
‡‡
Laboratory analysis by:L. Thurgood
Data entered by:J. Hines
Checked by:J. Hines
Volume adjustments are applicable at this matric potential (see comment #1). Changes in volume, if applicable, are estimated based on
obtainable measurements of changes in sample length and diameter.
Applicable if the sample experienced volume changes during testing. ‘Volume Adjusted’ values represent the volume change measurements
obtained after the last hanging column or pressure plate point. "---" indicates no volume changes occurred.
Represents percent volume change from original sample volume. A '+' denotes measured sample swelling, a '-' denotes measured sample
settling, and '---' denotes no volume change occurred.
Adjusted for >2.00mm (#10 sieve) material not used in DPP/RH testing. Assumed moisture content of material >2.00mm is zero, and
assumed density of water is 1.0 g/cm3.
46
Water Retention Data Points
Sample Number: EA-TP6 (95%)
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+06
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Pr
e
s
s
u
r
e

H
e
a
d

(
-cm

w
a
t
e
r
)
Moisture Content (%,cm3/cm3)
Hanging column
Pressure plate
Dew point potentiometer
Rh box
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
47
Predicted Water Retention Curve and Data Points
Sample Number: EA-TP6 (95%)
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+06
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Pr
e
s
s
u
r
e

H
e
a
d

(
-cm

w
a
t
e
r
)
Moisture Content (%,cm3/cm3)
Hanging column
Pressure plate
Dew point potentiometer
Rh box
Predicted curve
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
48
Plot of Relative Hydraulic Conductivity vs Moisture Content
Sample Number: EA-TP6 (95%)
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Re
l
a
t
i
v
e

H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
Moisture Content (%,cm3/cm3)
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
49
Plot of Hydraulic Conductivity vs Moisture Content
Sample Number: EA-TP6 (95%)
1.E-12
1.E-11
1.E-10
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Hy
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y

(
c
m
/
s
)
Moisture Content (%,cm3/cm3)
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
50
Plot of Relative Hydraulic Conductivity vs Pressure Head
Sample Number: EA-TP6 (95%)
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 1.E+01 1.E+02 1.E+03 1.E+04 1.E+05 1.E+06
Re
l
a
t
i
v
e

H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
Pressure Head (-cm water)
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
51
Plot of Hydraulic Conductivity vs Pressure Head
Sample Number: EA-TP6 (95%)
1.E-12
1.E-11
1.E-10
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 1.E+01 1.E+02 1.E+03 1.E+04 1.E+05 1.E+06
Hy
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y

(
c
m
/
s
)
Pressure Head (-cm water)
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
52
Moisture Retention Data
Hanging Column / Pressure Plate
(Soil-Water Characteristic Curve)
Job Name:Engineering Analytics, Inc.Dry wt. of sample (g):318.47
Job Number:DB23.1131.00 Tare wt., ring (g):136.69
Sample Number:EA-TP8 (95%)Tare wt., screen & clamp (g):28.18
Project Number:110444 Initial sample volume (cm3):220.50
Project Name:Shootering Closure Design Initial dry bulk density (g/cm3):1.44
Assumed particle density (g/cm3):2.75
Initial calculated total porosity (%):47.48
Matric Moisture
Weight*Potential Content †
Date Time (g)(-cm water)(% vol)
Hanging column:3-May-23 8:30 591.21 0 47.83 ‡‡
10-May-23 15:00 594.63 17.8 48.47 ‡‡
17-May-23 17:30 593.95 52.8 48.21 ‡‡
25-May-23 7:45 585.28 128.0 44.56 ‡‡
Pressure plate:5-Jun-23 8:55 579.89 337 42.39 ‡‡
Volume Adjusted Data 1
Adjusted
Matric Adjusted % Volume Adjusted Calculated
Potential Volume Change 2 Density Porosity
(-cm water)(cm3)(%)(g/cm3)(%)
Hanging column:0.0 225.55 +2.29%1.41 48.66
17.8 229.60 +4.13%1.39 49.56
52.8 229.43 +4.05%1.39 49.52
128.0 228.79 +3.76%1.39 49.38
Pressure plate:337 227.77 +3.29%1.40 49.16
Comments:
1
2
*Weight including tares
†Assumed density of water is 1.0 g/cm3
‡‡
Technician Notes:
Laboratory analysis by:D. O'Dowd
Data entered by:J. Hines
Checked by:J. Hines
Represents percent volume change from original sample volume. A '+' denotes measured sample swelling, a '-' denotes measured sample
settling, and '---' denotes no volume change occurred.
Applicable if the sample experienced volume changes during testing. ‘Volume Adjusted’ values represent each of the volume change
measurements obtained after saturated hydraulic conductivity testing and throughout hanging column/pressure plate testing. "---" indicates
no volume changes occurred.
Volume adjustments are applicable at this matric potential (see comment #1). Changes in volume, if applicable, are estimated based on
obtainable measurements of changes in sample length and diameter.
53
Moisture Retention Data
Dew Point Potentiometer / Relative Humidity Box
(Soil-Water Characteristic Curve)
Sample Number:EA-TP8 (95%)
Initial sample bulk density (g/cm3):1.44
Fraction of bulk sample used (<2.00mm fraction) (%):88.99
Dry weight* of dew point potentiometer sample (g):165.59
Tare weight, jar (g):112.24
Weight*Water Potential Moisture Content †
Date Time (g)(-cm water)(% vol)
Dew point potentiometer:9-Jun-23 11:30 172.98 100348 17.24 ‡‡
8-Jun-23 16:40 172.26 174692 15.56 ‡‡
8-Jun-23 9:47 171.16 452893 12.99 ‡‡
7-Jun-23 15:20 170.51 662870 11.48 ‡‡
Volume Adjusted Data 1
Water Adjusted % Volume Adjusted Adjusted
Potential Volume Change 2 Density Calc. Porosity
(-cm water)(cm3)(%)(g/cm3)(%)
Dew point potentiometer:100348 227.77 +3.29%1.40 49.16
174692 227.77 +3.29%1.40 49.16
452893 227.77 +3.29%1.40 49.16
662870 227.77 +3.29%1.40 49.16
Comments:
1
2
*Weight including tares
†
‡‡Volume adjustments are applicable at this matric potential (see comment #1).
Laboratory analysis by:L. Thurgood
Data entered by:J. Hines
Checked by:J. Hines
Applicable if the sample experienced volume changes during testing. ‘Volume Adjusted’ values represent the volume change measurements
obtained after the last hanging column or pressure plate point. "---" indicates no volume changes occurred.
Represents percent volume change from original sample volume. A '+' denotes measured sample swelling, a '-' denotes measured sample
settling, and '---' denotes no volume change occurred.
Adjusted for >2.00mm (#10 sieve) material not used in DPP/RH testing. Assumed moisture content of material >2.00mm is zero, and
assumed density of water is 1.0 g/cm3.
54
Moisture Retention Data
Dew Point Potentiometer / Relative Humidity Box
(Soil-Water Characteristic Curve)
Sample Number:EA-TP8 (95%)
Initial sample bulk density (g/cm3):1.44
Fraction of bulk sample used (<2.00mm fraction) (%):88.99
Dry weight* of relative humidity box sample (g):98.94
Tare weight (g):45.04
Weight*Water Potential Moisture Content †
Date Time (g)(-cm water)(% vol)
Relative humidity box:13-Jun-23 17:15 103.62 852439 10.80 ‡‡
Volume Adjusted Data 1
Water Adjusted % Volume Adjusted Adjusted
Potential Volume Change 2 Density Calc. Porosity
(-cm water)(cm3)(%)(g/cm3)(%)
Relative humidity box:852439 227.77 +3.29%1.40 49.16
Comments:
1
2
*Weight including tares
†
‡‡
Laboratory analysis by:L. Thurgood
Data entered by:J. Hines
Checked by:J. Hines
Volume adjustments are applicable at this matric potential (see comment #1). Changes in volume, if applicable, are estimated based on
obtainable measurements of changes in sample length and diameter.
Applicable if the sample experienced volume changes during testing. ‘Volume Adjusted’ values represent the volume change measurements
obtained after the last hanging column or pressure plate point. "---" indicates no volume changes occurred.
Represents percent volume change from original sample volume. A '+' denotes measured sample swelling, a '-' denotes measured sample
settling, and '---' denotes no volume change occurred.
Adjusted for >2.00mm (#10 sieve) material not used in DPP/RH testing. Assumed moisture content of material >2.00mm is zero, and
assumed density of water is 1.0 g/cm3.
55
Water Retention Data Points
Sample Number: EA-TP8 (95%)
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+06
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Pr
e
s
s
u
r
e

H
e
a
d

(
-cm

w
a
t
e
r
)
Moisture Content (%,cm3/cm3)
Hanging column
Pressure plate
Dew point potentiometer
Rh box
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
56
Predicted Water Retention Curve and Data Points
Sample Number: EA-TP8 (95%)
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+06
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Pr
e
s
s
u
r
e

H
e
a
d

(
-cm

w
a
t
e
r
)
Moisture Content (%,cm3/cm3)
Hanging column
Pressure plate
Dew point potentiometer
Rh box
Predicted curve
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
57
Plot of Relative Hydraulic Conductivity vs Moisture Content
Sample Number: EA-TP8 (95%)
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Re
l
a
t
i
v
e

H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
Moisture Content (%,cm3/cm3)
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
58
Plot of Hydraulic Conductivity vs Moisture Content
Sample Number: EA-TP8 (95%)
1.E-12
1.E-11
1.E-10
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Hy
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y

(
c
m
/
s
)
Moisture Content (%,cm3/cm3)
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
59
Plot of Relative Hydraulic Conductivity vs Pressure Head
Sample Number: EA-TP8 (95%)
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 1.E+01 1.E+02 1.E+03 1.E+04 1.E+05 1.E+06
Re
l
a
t
i
v
e

H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
Pressure Head (-cm water)
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
60
Plot of Hydraulic Conductivity vs Pressure Head
Sample Number: EA-TP8 (95%)
1.E-12
1.E-11
1.E-10
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 1.E+01 1.E+02 1.E+03 1.E+04 1.E+05 1.E+06
Hy
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y

(
c
m
/
s
)
Pressure Head (-cm water)
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
61
Laboratory Tests and Methods
62
Dry Bulk Density:ASTM D7263
Moisture Content:ASTM D7263, ASTM D2216
Calculated Porosity:ASTM D7263
Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity:
Falling Head Rising Tail:
(Flexible Wall)
ASTM D5084
Hanging Column Method: ASTM D6836 (modified apparatus)
Pressure Plate Method: ASTM D6836
Water Potential (Dewpoint
Potentiometer) Method:
ASTM D6836
Relative Humidity (Box)
Method:
Campbell, G. and G. Gee. 1986. Water Potential: Miscellaneous Methods. Chp. 25, pp.
631-632, in A. Klute (ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. American Society of
Agronomy, Madison, WI; Karathanasis & Hajek. 1982. Quantitative Evaluation of Water
Adsorption on Soil Clays. SSA Journal 46:1321-1325
Moisture Retention
Characteristics &
Calculated Unsaturated
Hydraulic Conductivity:
ASTM D6836; van Genuchten, M.T. 1980. A closed-form equation for predicting the
hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. SSSAJ 44:892-898; van Genuchten, M.T., F.J.
Leij, and S.R. Yates. 1991. The RETC code for quantifying the hydraulic functions of
unsaturated soils. Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory, Office of Research
and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Ada, Oklahoma.
EPA/600/2091/065. December 1991
Tests and Methods
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
63
APPENDIX C
SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS
SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM FACILITY

Seismic Hazard Analysis
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility

Prepared for:

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

Prepared by:

1600 Specht Point Road, Suite 209
Fort Collins, Colorado 80525
[phone]
Fax [phone]

Project No. 110444

November 7, 2023
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Seismic Hazard Analysis Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

November 7, 2023 i Engineering Analytics, Inc.
TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1
1.1 Project Location ................................................................................................................. 1
1.2 Previous Work .................................................................................................................... 1
1.2.1 Plateau Resources ....................................................................................................... 1
1.2.2 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories ............................................................... 1
2.0 GEOLOGIC SETTING ..................................................................................................... 3
2.1 Regional Physiographic and Tectonic Setting ................................................................... 3
2.2 Site Geology ....................................................................................................................... 4
3.0 SEISMICITY ...................................................................................................................... 5
4.0 SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS ...................................................................................... 6
4.1 Seismic Sources.................................................................................................................. 6
4.1.1 Faults .......................................................................................................................... 6
4.1.2 Background Event ....................................................................................................... 7
4.1.2.1 Background Event in Deterministic Analyses ..................................................... 7
4.1.2.2 Background Event in Probabilistic Analyses ...................................................... 7
4.2 Attenuation Relations ......................................................................................................... 8
4.3 Deterministic Analysis ....................................................................................................... 9
4.4 Probabilistic Analysis ......................................................................................................... 9
5.0 RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................. 12
6.0 LIMITATIONS ................................................................................................................. 13
7.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................. 14

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Seismic Hazard Analysis Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

November 7, 2023 ii Engineering Analytics, Inc.
LIST OF TABLES

Table C-1 Minimum Criteria for Faults Considered in Seismic Investigation (NRC 10 CFR
Appendix A to Part 100)
Table C-2 Completeness Periods and Event Counts Used in Recurrence Calculations
Table C-3 National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) Site Class Definitions
Table C-4 Hazard Contribution to Total Mean Hazard for 10,000-year Return Period,
Probabilistic Analysis

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure C-1 Project Location
Figure C-2 Historical Earthquakes with Magnitude Greater than 4.0 within 300 Kilometers
Figure C-3 Historical Earthquakes with Magnitude Greater than 2.4 within 100 Kilometers
Figure C-4 Faults with Quaternary Displacement that meet NRC Minimum Criteria for
Consideration within 300 Kilometers of the Facility
Figure C-5 Temporal Distribution of Earthquakes within the 300 Kilometer Radius around the
Facility
Figure C-6 Recurrence Curve for Earthquakes within the 300 Kilometer Radius around the
Facility
Figure C-7 Total Seismic Hazard Curve
Figure C-8 Source Contribution to Total Seismic Hazard

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Seismic Hazard Analysis Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

November 7, 2023 iii Engineering Analytics, Inc.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

Attachment C1 USGS National Seismic Hazard Maps from 1996
Attachment C2 Earthquake Events near the Facility
C2.1 Earthquake Events with Magnitude Greater than or Equal to 4.0 Occurring
Within 300 Kilometers of the Facility
C2.2 Earthquake Events with Magnitude Greater Than or Equal to 2.4 Occurring
Within 100 Kilometers of the Facility
Attachment C3 Faults with Quaternary Displacement near the Facility
C3.1 List of Faults within 300 Kilometers of the Facility that meet NRC
Minimum Criteria
C3.2 USGS Description of Faults Meeting the NRC Minimum Criteria
Attachment C4 Deterministic Analyses
C4.1 Deterministic EZ-Frisk Software Input
C4.2 Deterministic Results
Attachment C5 Probabilistic Analyses
C5.1 Summary of Probabilistic Characteristics
C5.2 Probabilistic EZ-Frisk Software Input
C5.3 Probabilistic Results

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Seismic Hazard Analysis Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

November 7, 2023 iv Engineering Analytics, Inc.
ABBREVIATIONS

CEUS Central and Eastern United States
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
g The unit for peak ground acceleration, the acceleration due to Earth’s gravity
GMM Ground Motion Models
IBC International Building Code
ISB Intermountain Seismic Belt
MCE Maximum Credible Earthquake
ML Local Magnitude
Mw Moment Magnitude
NEHRP National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program
NEIC National Earthquake Information Center
NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission
NSHMP National Seismic Hazard Model Project
PE Probability of Exceedance
PEER Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center
PGA Peak Ground Acceleration
TSF Tailings Storage Facility
USGS United States Geological Survey
VS30 Average Shear Wave Velocity to Depth of 30 meters
WUS Western United States

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Seismic Hazard Analysis Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

November 7, 2023 1 Engineering Analytics, Inc.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
In 2008, Tetra Tech completed a seismic hazard analysis for the Shootaring Canyon Uranium
Mill site (Tetra Tech, 2008). Engineering Analytics, Inc. (EA) has prepared this seismic hazard
analysis as an update to the work performed in 2008. EA has incorporated recent seismicity
and new attenuation relationships into the analysis.

The Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility (Facility) is currently in Standby status. Anfield
Resources Holding Corp. is proposing to convert the present license to operational status. This
seismic hazard analysis has been prepared to characterize the peak horizontal ground
acceleration (PGA) for use in seismic stability analyses for the facility.
1.1 Project Location
The Facility is located in a sparsely populated area of Garfield County, southeastern Utah,
approximately 50 miles south of Hanksville, Utah. The Facility is shown on Figure C-1. A
small town, Ticaboo, is located 2.6 miles south of the Facility. For the purposes of these
analyses, the central location of the Facility has coordinates of 37.71°N latitude and -110.70°W
longitude.

1.2 Previous Work
1.2.1 Plateau Resources
Seismicity of the Facility was discussed in the Tailings Management Plan issued by Plateau
Resources, Ltd and Hydro-Engineering, LLC in 2007. Attachment A of that report included
the results of several tailings stability and deformation analyses. Attachment A.1 included
results from a January 9, 1997 pseudostatic stability analysis of the Facility tailings dam. The
analysis was performed using a horizontal seismic coefficient of 0.19g based on a published
report by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories (Bernreuter et. al., 1995). Attachment
A.5 included a June 14, 1999 deformation analysis on the Facility tailings dam. The analyses
were performed using a PGA of 0.33g based on a U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Peak
Acceleration Map. The source of the Peak Acceleration Map presented in the Tailings
Management Plan (Plateau Resources, Ltd and Hydro-Engineering, LLC, 2007) was not
referenced in the report. A reproduction of this map is presented for convenience in
Attachment C1 of this report. Tetra Tech (2008) presented a map from the USGS National
Seismic Hazard Model Project (NSHMP) website using 1996 NSHMP data for 2 percent
probability of exceedance in 50 years. This map is also shown in Attachment C1 of this report.
As discussed in Tetra Tech (2008), it is assumed that the map provided in Plateau Resources
report (2007) is for 1 percent probability of exceedance in 50 years.

1.2.2 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories (Bernreuter et. al., 1995) performed a seismic
hazard analysis for the Facility as part of a study of all Title II sites performed for the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The purpose of the study was to evaluate the seismic
design assumptions for mining sites where uranium tailings are being stored, by performing
simplified deterministic and probabilistic analyses. Results of this study concluded that the
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Seismic Hazard Analysis Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

November 7, 2023 2 Engineering Analytics, Inc.
PGA using deterministic methods is 0.3g (median plus one sigma) and using probabilistic
methods is 0.19g for an annual probability of exceedance (PE) of 1x10-4.

The deterministic analysis concentrated on three faults of the Bright Angel fault system. The
three faults evaluated include the fault closest to the site, and then two larger, but more distant,
faults of the system. The Bernreuter and others (1995) analysis concluded that the closest fault
(4 kilometers long, located 9 kilometers from the Facility) has the greatest potential impact on
the Facility. Attenuation equations used in the analysis were not specified.

The probabilistic analysis considered the pattern of random earthquakes occurring in an
undefined source zone around the Facility. Earthquake catalogs from the past 30 years
(presumably from 1965 to 1995) were used to estimate a recurrence model for the area. The
three faults of the Bright Angel fault system were not incorporated into their probabilistic
analysis.

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Seismic Hazard Analysis Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

November 7, 2023 3 Engineering Analytics, Inc.
2.0 GEOLOGIC SETTING

2.1 Regional Physiographic and Tectonic Setting
The Facility is located within the Colorado Plateau physiographic province in southeastern
Utah. The Colorado Plateau is a broad, roughly circular region of relative structural stability
within a more structurally active region of disturbed mountain systems. Broad basins and
uplifts, monoclines, and belts of anticlines and synclines are characteristic of the plateau
(Kelley, 1979). Igneous intrusions have formed several mountains, such as the Henry
Mountains near the Facility. However, most of the topographic relief in the Colorado Plateau is
the result of erosion of deep canyons rather than upstanding mountain ranges (Thornbury,
1965).

The Facility is located near the southern end of the Henry Mountains structural basin. The
basin contains sedimentary rocks ranging from Mesozoic to Cenozoic in age, which are cut by
the Tertiary intrusives forming the Henry Mountains, including Mt. Ellsworth. Fault
development in the area is associated with the intrusive igneous centers of the Henry
Mountains. These faults commonly have a northeasterly or northwesterly strike and do not
generally extend far from the intrusive bodies. Faults are not known to exist within the
immediate Facility area.

The interior of the Colorado Plateau is characterized by low heat-flow (Bodell and Chapman,
1982) and a thick (45 kilometers) crust (Keller, Braile, and Morgan, 1979), as compared to the
surrounding Basin and Range Province and Rio Grande rift. The transition zone between the
interior and the surrounding provinces may be as wide as 100 to 150 kilometers (Zoback and
Zoback, 1989). These data suggest a weakening of the sides of the plateau lithosphere. Such
weakening is consistent with the normal faulting along the margins of the plateau. The source
of the relative stability of the Colorado Plateau thus is probably related to the cooler interior
that has been stronger than the surrounding regions (Morgan and Swanberg, 1985).

The seismicity of the Colorado Plateau was investigated by Wong and Humphrey (1989) based
on seismic monitoring. Their study characterized the seismicity of the plateau as being of small
to moderate magnitude, of a low to moderate rate of occurrence with earthquakes widely
distributed. Seismicity in the plateau appears to be the result of the reactivation of pre -existing
faults not expressed at the surface but favorably oriented to the tectonic stress field. Very few
earthquakes can be associated with known geologic structures or tectonic features in the
plateau. The generally small size of the earthquakes and their widespread distribution is
consistent with a highly faulted Precambrian basement and upper crust, and a moderate level of
differential tectonic stresses. Earthquakes in the plateau generally occur within the upper 15 to
20 kilometers of the upper crust (Smith, 1978; Wong and Chapman, 1986) although events
have occurred as deep as 58 kilometers (Wong and Humphrey, 1989). The predominant mode
of tectonic deformation within the plateau appears to be normal faulting on northwest - to
north-northwest-striking faults, with some localized occurrences of strike-slip displacement on
northwest- or northeast-striking planes at shallow depths. The contemporary state of stress
within the plateau is characterized by approximately northeast-trending extension (Wong and
Humphrey, 1989).
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Seismic Hazard Analysis Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

November 7, 2023 4 Engineering Analytics, Inc.
2.2 Site Geology

The geologic conditions for the Facility were summarized in the design report issued by Tetra
Tech (2008). It was also discussed in the reports issued by Woodward Clyde Consultants (1978)
and Hydro-Engineering (2005). The site-specific geology information provided in the Design
Report (Tetra Tech, 2008) is summarized below for reference.

The Facility is situated on a low mesa and a small, isolated catchment to the west contains the
tailings storage facility (TSF). A tall butte separates the Facility from Shootaring Canyon.
Drainage from the site is to the southwest into Sh ootaring Creek. The tributary in which the TSF
is located has been called Shootaring Canyon. Local relief ranges from 200 to 500 feet. Geologic
structure is relatively simple in the immediate area, with the various sedimentary formations
dipping gently (2 to 3 degrees) to the west.

Sedimentary rocks exposed at the surface are predominantly sandstones of Upper Jurassic age.
The high buttes and mesas west and north of the Facility are capped by the Salt Wash Member of
the Morrison Formation. This fluvial sandstone unit contains the uranium deposits that are mined
in the area. Exposed cliffs surrounding the buttes and mesas are comprised primarily of the thinly
bedded reddish-brown siltstones and mudstones of the Summerville Formation, underlain by the
generally massive fine grained reddish-brown Entrada Sandstone. The Entrada Sandstone is the
bedrock underlying the Facility and the TSF.

Based on the original geologic mapping completed by Woodward Clyde (1978) and the
information presented by Hydro-Engineering (2005), the Entrada Formation has an approximate
thickness of 420 feet. Cementing agents are commonly calcite and ferric iron (Paster, 2002). The
depositional environment is believed to be primarily eolian. Shale is also present locally and is
evidence of episodes of marginal marine conditions.

No major faulting has been observed in the Entrada Sandstone at the Facility. Limited sets of
joints are widely spaced, steeply dipping and sealed with calcite and gypsum (Paster, 2002).
Joint trends are northwesterly and northeasterly, coinciding with the regional structural pattern.

Beneath the Entrada Sandstone lies the Carmel Formation, which is a heterogeneous unit
approximately 160 feet thick composed of sandstone, siltstone, mudstone, limestone and
gypsum. In the Shootaring Canyon area, the Carmel Formation appears to include substantial
layers of shale or mudstone. The Carmel Formation is underlain by the Navajo Formation which
is approximately 800 feet thick in the vicinity of the Facility. The base of the Navajo Formation
is approximately 1,400 feet beneath the surface of the Facility.

Fault development in the area is associated with the intrusive igneous centers of the Henry
Mountains. These faults commonly have a northeasterly or northwesterly strike and do not
generally extend far from the intrusive bodies. Faults are not known to exist within the Facility

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Seismic Hazard Analysis Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

November 7, 2023 5 Engineering Analytics, Inc.
3.0 SEISMICITY
NRC NUREG-6372 recommends that seismic sources within 300 kilometers be characterized
for a site. The publication states that the distance for detailed source characterization for a site
that contains a fault within 50 kilometers of the site is 100 kilometers. Therefore, this seismic
hazard analysis for the Facility included a review of historic earthquakes which have occurred
within 300 kilometers of the Facility and detailed review of the earthquakes within 100
kilometers. For purposes of this report, this 300-kilometer radius surrounding the Facility is
termed the seismic study area. This earthquake record, which contains earthquakes from 1892
to 2022, provides a general overview of the seismicity in the study area of the Facility. Our
final search and review of earthquake activity took place on September 19, 2023; therefore, any
earthquakes occurring after this date are not included in the analysis.

Catalogs from the USGS NSHMP for 2018 for the Western United States (WUS) and Central
and Eastern United States (CEUS) (Rukstales and Petersen, 2019) were reviewed to compile
information on the historic earthquakes. These catalogs, compiled by the USGS for their study,
included removal of duplicate events as well as aftershocks and foreshocks related to the
primary earthquake events in order to obtain a catalog of independent events (Mueller, 2019).
The database includes historical seismic events over the period from 1700 through 2016. The
WUS and CEUS catalogs were supplemented with events occurring between January 2017 and
September 2023 by searching the National Earthquake Information Center (NEIC) database,
also maintained by the USGS. This supplemental search resulted in six additional earthquakes.
The catalog searches were limited to events with moment magnitude (Mw) greater than or
equal to 4.0. A total of 79 events are included in the record. Earthquake activity is relatively
diffuse and generally of small magnitudes, as shown in Figure C-2. The earthquakes are
tabulated in Attachment C2.1.

The earthquakes generally have small magnitudes with 75 percent of the earthquakes having a
magnitude less than 5.0. Figure C-2 shows that earthquake activity within a 300 kilometer
radius of the site is diffuse, with the exception of the western half of the area of interest, which
lies within the Intermountain Seismic Belt. The largest event is estimated in the WUS catalog
to have an Mw of 6.33. This event occurred near Flagstaff, Arizona on January 25, 1906. The
epicenter is approximately 293 kilometers southwest of the Facility, within the Basin and
Range–Colorado Plateau transition zone, a seismically active zone between the western border
of the Colorado Plateau, and the Basin and Range physiographic province. The event closest to
the Facility had an epicenter about 63 kilometers northwest of the Facility. This earthquake,
which occurred on September 30, 1963, had an Mw of 4.2.

In addition to the evaluation of significant earthquakes (Mw>4) as described above, a search of
low magnitude events (Mw>2.4) within 100 kilometers of the Facility was also conducted.
These events are shown in Figure C-3 and are tabulated in Attachment C2.2.

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Seismic Hazard Analysis Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

November 7, 2023 6 Engineering Analytics, Inc.
4.0 SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS
Seismic hazard analyses are typically conducted using one of two methods: (1) deterministic
analysis or (2) probabilistic analysis. Both analyses were conducted for this seismic study as
discussed below. The seismic sources and attenuation equations used for this seismic hazard
analysis are also discussed below, followed by the results of the deterministic and probabilistic
analyses.
4.1 Seismic Sources
4.1.1 Faults
The existence and location of faults with Quaternary displacement were primarily identified
using the USGS Quaternary Fault and Fold database (USGS et. al., 2023). A “capable fault” is
defined by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in 10 CFR Appendix A to Part 100 –
Seismic and Geologic Siting Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants – as a fault that has exhibited
one or more of the following characteristics:
1. Movement at or near the ground surface at least once within the past 35,000 years
or movement of a recurring nature within the past 500,000 years.
2. Macro-seismicity (magnitude 3.5 or greater) instrumentally determined with
records of sufficient precision to demonstrate a direct relationship with the fault.
3. A structural relationship to a capable fault according to characteristics (1) or (2)
above such that movement on one could be reasonably expected to be accompanied
by movement on the other.
Capable faults must also meet the minimum criteria for fault length and distance from the
Facility, as defined by NRC 10 CFR Appendix A to Part 100, and included in Table C-1 in this
report. A fault that is deemed capable by the criteria listed above, but does not meet the
minimum criteria provided in Table C-1, does not need to be considered in the seismic hazard
analysis. The faults within 300 kilometers of the Facility that met these criteria are shown on
Figure C-4. A tabulated list of the faults is included in Attachment C3.1.
All faults meeting the requirements outlined in Table C-1 were considered in this seismic
study. This is a conservative approach because although the NRC defines a “capable fault” as
one having “movement at or near the ground surface at least once within the past 35,000 years
or movement of a recurring nature within the past 500,000 years,” including all identifiable
faults with Quaternary displacement would include fault movement over the past 1.6 million
years. This was done because sufficient information does not exist for many of the faults with
Quaternary displacement as to the timing of the last movement of the fault.
The USGS separates the faults with Quaternary displacement into classes. These classes are
provided below, as described by USGS and others (2023).
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Seismic Hazard Analysis Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

November 7, 2023 7 Engineering Analytics, Inc.
• For a Class A fault, geologic evidence demonstrates the existence of a Quaternary
fault of tectonic origin, whether the fault is exposed by mapping or inferred from
liquefaction or other deformational features.
• For a Class B fault, geologic evidence demonstrates the existence of Quaternary
deformation, but either 1) the fault might not extend deeply enough to be a potential
source of significant earthquakes, or 2) the currently available geologic evidence is
too strong to confidently assign the feature to Class C but not strong enough to
assign it to Class A.
• For a Class C fault, geologic evidence is insufficient to demonstrate 1) the existence
of tectonic faulting, or 2) Quaternary slip or deformation associated with the
feature.
• For a Class D fault, geologic evidence demonstrates that the feature is not a tectonic
fault or feature; this category includes features such as joints, landslides, erosional
or fluvial scarps, or other landforms resembling fault scarps but of demonstrable
non-tectonic origin.
The faults with Quaternary displacement that meet the NRC minimum criteria and included in
this analysis are either Class A or B. Descriptions from the USGS and others (2023), of the
faults included in this analysis, are included in Attachment C3.2.

4.1.2 Background Event

Earthquakes sometimes occur that are not associated with a known geologic structure. These
events are termed “background events” or “floating earthquakes.” Evaluation of background
events allows for potential low to moderate earthquakes unassociated with tectonic structures to
be considered in the seismic hazard of the Facility. The maximum magnitude for these
background events within the Intermountain United States ranges between local magnitude (ML)
6.0 and 6.5 (Woodward-Clyde, 1996). Larger earthquakes would be expected to leave a
detectable surface expression, especially in arid to semiarid climates, with slow erosion rates and
limited vegetation. In seismically less active areas such as the Colorado Plateau, the maximum
magnitude associated with a background event is assumed to be 6.3, consistent with that used in
seismic evaluations performed for uranium tailing sites in Green River (DOE 1991a, pg. 26), and
Grand Junction (DOE 1991b, pg. 71)

4.1.2.1 Background Event in Deterministic Analyses

Background or floating earthquakes are typically evaluated deterministically by placing the
largest earthquake that can be assumed to occur unassociated with a known fault, at a distance of
15 kilometers from the Facility.

4.1.2.2 Background Event in Probabilistic Analyses

The hazard from background earthquakes is assessed using two approaches, each given equal
weight in the probabilistic analysis. The first approach uses areal source zones and assumes a
uniformly distributed seismicity within the zone. The second approach uses gridded seismicity
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Seismic Hazard Analysis Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

November 7, 2023 8 Engineering Analytics, Inc.
which retains a degree of stationarity using 0.1-degree latitude and longitude grid spacing, as
used by USGS for the NSHMP.

The earthquake magnitude and recurrence interval of an areal source zone was assessed by
looking at the earthquake record within 300 kilometers of the Facility, filtered to include only
events with Mw values equal or greater than 4.0, as described in Section 3. The entire
300-kilometer radius circle about the Facility was evaluated as a source zone with uniformly
distributed seismicity. As shown in Figures C-2 and C-4, the western half of the 300-kilometer
radius circle has a high concentration of Quaternary faults and historical earthquake events.
This zone corresponds to the Intermountain Seismic Belt (ISB), an area of significant
earthquake activity.

The earthquake recurrence of the 300-kilometer source zone was described by the
truncated-exponential form of the Gutenberg-Richter relationship of log N = a — bM using the
maximum likelihood procedure by Weichert (1980). The parameters a and b were determined
through a linear regression calculation using the completeness periods for various magnitudes
as estimated by Peterson and others (2020). Table C-2 gives the completeness period dates and
the number of earthquakes during each period. Figure C-5 shows the temporal distribution of
earthquakes within the study area, and Figure C-6 shows the recurrence curve.

A study by Wong and others (1996) also evaluated the recurrence of background events within
the Colorado Plateau. The relationship developed by Wong and others (1996) is a robust
analysis which limits the source zone to that most seismically similar to the project site. The
seismicity record only goes through 1994. However, the recurrence parameters developed for
that study are similar to those developed for this analysis.

4.2 Attenuation Relations

Attenuation of ground motions from the location of a seismic event to the site was calculated
using attenuation relations. Due to the absence of abundant strong ground motion records, no
specific attenuation relation exists solely for Utah. Therefore, we have used ground motion
models (GMMs) appropriate for tectonically active crustal regions. The crustal GMMs that
were used were developed as part of the NGA-West2 Project sponsored by the Pacific
Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center Lifelines Program. These models are also
used by the USGS in developing the U.S. National Seismic Hazard Maps. EA used four of the
five NGA-West2 GMMs in the analyses: Chiou and Youngs (2014), Campbell and Bozorgnia
(2014), Abrahamson and others (2014), and Boore and others (2014). Idriss (2014) was not
included due to its lack of a hanging wall model and because it is not applicable for time-
averaged shear-wave velocity at a depth of 30 meters (VS30) less than 450 m/sec.

The Chiou and Youngs (2014), Abrahamson and others (2014), and Boore and others (2014)
references cannot be used for the areal source zone. Additionally, the NGA West2 models are
not as well constrained for extensional normal faulting. Therefore, EA used two additional
models in our analysis. These two equations were Abrahamson and Silva (1997) and Spudich
and others (1999). An important consideration in the selection of appropriate attenuation
relationships is the tectonic regime of the study area. As discussed in Section 2, the study area
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Seismic Hazard Analysis Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

November 7, 2023 9 Engineering Analytics, Inc.
for the Facility is located within an extensional tectonic regime where the dominant fault type
is normal faulting. Because Spudich and others (1999) attenuation relationship was developed
from a database of extensional earthquakes and Abrahamson and Silva (1997) include normal
faulting factors in the attenuation relations, these attenuation equations are considered
appropriate.

Three parameters need to be specified in order to use the above attenuation equations. The first
parameter is the depth at which the shear wave velocity of the soil reaches 1,000 meters per
second (m/s). The National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP, 2003) issued a
publication which discusses site classification for seismic design. The publication listed the site
classes and corresponding shear wave velocities. This information is summarized in Table C-3.
Sandstone bedrock is located at or near the ground surface at many locations at the Facility.
Therefore, EA used a depth of 2 meters for this parameter. The next parameter to be specified
is the average shear wave velocity of the top 30 meters. The average shear wave velocity in
the top 30 meters was estimated to be 1,000 m/s. As shown in the Table C-3, a shear wave
velocity of 1,000 m/s is the middle of the rock category. The final parameter is the depth at
which shear wave velocity of the soil reaches 2,500 m/s (hard rock). As discussed in Section 2,
the base of the Navajo Formation is approximately 1,400 feet beneath the surface of the
Facility. Therefore, a depth of 0.43 kilometers was used for this parameter.
4.3 Deterministic Analysis

In deterministic analyses, the ground motions from the maximum credible earthquake (MCE)
associated with capable faults are attenuated to the Facility. Background, or floating,
earthquakes are typically evaluated deterministically by placing the largest earthquake that can
be assumed to occur unassociated with a known fault at a distance of 15 kilometers from the
Facility.

The seismic sources considered for the deterministic analysis include the previously described
faults that meet the minimum fault criteria presented in 10 CFR Appendix A to Part 100, as
well as the background or floating event. The MCE associated with each fault was calculated
based on correlations between fault surface rupture length and earthquake magnitude as
presented by Wells and Coppersmith (1994). The MCE for the background event was 6.3, as
discussed above. The ground motions from the MCE associated with capable faults and the
background event were attenuated to the Facility using the attenuation relations described in
Section 4.2. Typically, ground motions of median plus one standard deviation are reported in
deterministic analyses. The PGA was calculated using EZ-FRISK Version: 8.07 (Risk
Engineering, 2021). Input and the complete deterministic spectra from the EZ-FRISK analysis
are included in Attachments C4.1 and C4.2, respectively. The inputs and results of the
deterministic analyses are also summarized in a table in the beginning of Attachment C4.2.
4.4 Probabilistic Analysis

The deterministic approach described above is commonly used for assessing seismic hazard in
the Intermountain United States. and can result in overly conservative seismic design for Title
II sites (Wong et. al., 1997). Therefore, a probabilistic analysis was also performed for the
Facility in order to evaluate the amount of risk associated with larger PGAs calculated by the
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Seismic Hazard Analysis Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

November 7, 2023 10 Engineering Analytics, Inc.
deterministic analysis. In probabilistic analyses, ground motions and the associated probability
of exceedance are estimated for the background event and for earthquakes on specific faults in
order to evaluate the amount of risk associated with the PGA.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Standards for the Control of Residual
Radioactive Materials from Inactive Uranium Processing Sites (40 CFR 192) and the NRC
Criteria Relating to the Operation of Uranium Mills and the Disposition of Tailings or Wastes
Produced by the Extraction or Concentration of Source Material From Ores Processed
Primarily for Their Source Material Content (NRC 10 CFR Appendix A to Part 40) both
specify that control of residual radioactive material be effective for up to one thousand years to
the extent reasonably achievable, and for at least 200 years. For the purpose of the seismic
hazard evaluation, a 10,000-year return period is adopted for evaluating long-term stability of
the Facility. The probability that the 10,000-year event will be exceeded within a 200- to
1,000- year design life is between 2 and 10 percent. This is consistent with the International
Building Code (International Code Council, 2021) which specifies designing for ground
motions associated with a 2 percent probability of exceedance in a 50 -year design life, or a
return period of approximately 2,500 years. Similarly, a 2,500-year return period is appropriate
during operational conditions, considering a design life of 50 years.

For the probabilistic analysis, faults that are included in the USGS Quaternary fault and fold
database and have the potential to produce PGAs of 0.05g or greater (based on deterministic
methods) were selected for further evaluation in the probabilistic model. These criteria resulted
in the inclusion of the following seven faults:

1. Bright Angel fault system, Fault 1, (2514),
2. Bright Angel fault system, Fault 2, (2514);
3. Bright Angel fault system, Fault 3, (2514);
4. Needles fault zone, (2507);
5. Shay graben, (2513);
6. Aquarius and Awapa plateau faults, (2505); and
7. Thousand Lakes fault (2506).

The three faults of the Bright Angel fault system, that were originally included in the
Bernreuter and others (1995) analysis, were included in this analysis. The three faults are
included in the hazard analysis due to their proximity to the Facility and potential impacts. This
fault system is classified as Class B in the Quaternary fault and fold database (USGS et. al.,
2023). The fault system is described as an expansive area of poorly understood suspected
Quaternary faults in the Colorado Plateau. The faults are entirely within bedrock, thus
Quaternary deformation cannot be proven. Focal mechanism studies by both Brumbaugh
(2005) and Wong and Humphrey (1989) indicate that within the Colorado Plateau, northwest
striking normal faults are compatible with the modern state of stress of northeast-trending
extension of the plateau and northeast trending faults tend to not be active. Based on these data,
the northeast trending faults of the Bright Angel fault system (labeled Fault 1 and 3 on
Figure C-4) will be assigned a low probability of seismogenic activity (0.10). Although
Quaternary deformation has not been proven (USGS et. al., 2023) and USGS did not consider
this fault system to be active in the NSHMP, the northwest-trending Fault 2 will be assigned a
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Seismic Hazard Analysis Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

November 7, 2023 11 Engineering Analytics, Inc.
higher probability of seismogenic activity of 0.50 because it is oriented favorably to the stress
field.

The Needles fault zone has been removed from the probabilistic analysis because it is a
structure resulting from salt movement that does not extend deeper than the evaporites of the
Paradox Formation and is not considered seismogenic (Wong et. al., 1996 and Huntoon, 1982).
The Shay graben faults have been assigned a lower probability of seismogenic activity (0.1)
due to evidence for late-Quaternary deformation being associated with salt-dissolution collapse
(Wong et. al., 1996 and Oviatt, 1988). The Aquarius and Awapa plateau faults and Thousand
Lakes fault have been assigned a probability of activity of 1.0.
Additional uncertainties in the fault characteristics are incorporated into the probabilistic
analysis by representing the possible scenarios with a weight value. In general, the mean value is
given a weight of 0.6, with the mean plus or minus one standard deviation values each given a
weight of 0.2. The parameters used in the probabilistic analysis are described below, and are
summarized in Attachment C5.1. Fault dips were assumed to vary between 40 and 80 degrees,
with a mean value of 60 degrees. This is consistent with the NSHMP, which assumes a dip of
60 degrees for most normal faults within the western United States, and with previous seismic
hazard analyses in the Colorado Plateau (Wong et al., 1996). Fault depths were assumed to
vary between 12 and 20 kilometers, with a mean value of 15 kilometers, as is typical in western
United States (Wong and Chapman, 1990). Maximum magnitudes for the faults were
estimated based upon the empirical relationship developed by Wells and Coppersmith (1994)
for surface rupture length, with an uncertainty of 0.3 corresponding to the standard error in the
Wells and Coppersmith (1994) relationship. The recurrence relationships for the faults were
modeled using both Gutenberg-Richter exponential and maximum magnitude recurrence
models. The exponential model was given a weight of 0.2 and the maximum magnitude model
was given a weight of 0.8 in the analysis. Slip rates are used to characterize rates of fault
activity. However, very limited data was available regarding slip rates, and the USGS fault and
fold database categorizes all the considered faults as simply having a slip -rate less than 0.2 mm
per year. Slip rates were therefore modeled as being between 0.005 and 0.2 mm per year,
similar to rates of activity assigned to many faults of questionable Quaternary activity in the
Rio Grande Rift area east of the Colorado Plateau (Wong et. al., 2004).

As discussed in Section 4.1.2.2, the hazard from background earthquakes is assessed using two
approaches, each given equal weight in the probabilistic analysis. The first approach uses areal
source zones and assumes a uniformly distributed seismicity within the zone. The second
approach uses gridded seismicity which retains a degree of stationarity using 0.1-degree latitude
and longitude grid spacing, as used by USGS for the NSHMP.

The EZ Frisk probabilistic input is included in Attachment C5.2. Table C-4 shows the seismic
source contribution to the total mean hazard at a return period of 10,000-years (1E-4 annual
percent exceedance). The total hazard curve is shown in Figure C-7 and the source contribution
is shown in Figure C-8. The complete results of the probabilistic analyses are included in
Attachment C5.3.

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Seismic Hazard Analysis Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

November 7, 2023 12 Engineering Analytics, Inc.
5.0 RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
Based on the deterministic analyses, Fault 2 of the Bright Angel Fault System produces the
largest peak ground acceleration (PGA). The median plus one standard deviation ground
motion for PGA is 0.32g. Six faults are identified as potentially capable of producing a PGA of
0.05g or greater and were analyzed probabilistically.
Probabilistic analyses were completed for 2,500- and 10,000-year return periods. The mean
PGA for the 2,500-year return period is estimated to be 0.14g and the mean PGA for the
10,000-year return period is estimated to be 0.25g. The probabilistic analysis shows that the
hazard is almost entirely controlled by the 300 kilometers radius source zone and the gridded
seismicity.
The USGS maintains a “USGS Earthquake Hazard Toolbox” that has web applications for
computing hazards for the USGS National Seismic Hazard Models. The USGS hazard curve
calculated a PGA of 0.12 for the 2,500-year return period and 0.32 for the 10,000-year return
period. The value of 0.25g is lower than the 0.32g from the USGS for the 10,000-year return
period. It is likely that the majority of the difference is a result of using different attenuation
relationships. The Facility is very close to the border drawn by USGS between the WUS and
CEUS zones. The Facility is located just within this CEUS boundary area. Because the Facility
lies within the CEUS area, the USGS applied some attenuation relations developed for the
CEUS. However, using attenuation relations that are specific to normal extensional faulting is
appropriate for this area as supported by Wong and others (e.g., Wong et. al., 1996; Halling et
al., 2002; Wong et. al., 2004).
Based on the probabilistic analysis, a PGA of 0.14g should be used for operational conditions
and 0.25g should be used for long-term Facility reclamation conditions. The U.S. Department
of Energy (DOE, 1989) recommends that a seismic coefficient of two-thirds of the peak ground
acceleration be used in pseudostatic stability analyses. Therefore, a seismic coefficient 0.09g is
recommended for operational conditions and a seismic coefficient of 0.17g is recommended for
long-term Facility reclamation conditions.

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Seismic Hazard Analysis Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

November 7, 2023 13 Engineering Analytics, Inc.
6.0 LIMITATIONS

The opinions and recommendations in this report are based on a reasonable degree of certainty.
This report has been prepared based upon review of the reference documents, geological
analyses, and our experience. The conclusions presented represent our best judgment based on
the information available. Should additional information become available we should be
allowed to review that information and modify our conclusions accordingly.

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Seismic Hazard Analysis Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

November 7, 2023 14 Engineering Analytics, Inc.
7.0 REFERENCES

Abrahamson, N.A. and W.J. Silva. (1997). Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for
shallow crustal earthquakes. Seismological Research Letters 68(1): 94-127.

Abrahamson, N.A., W.J. Silva, and R. Kamai. (2014). Summary of the ASK14 ground-motion
relation for active crustal regions. Earthquake Spectra 30(3): 1025-1055.

Bernreuter, D., E. McDermott, and J. Wagoner. (1995). Seismic Hazard Analysis of Title II
Reclamation Plans. Prepared for U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Lawrence
Livermore National Laboratory, UCRL-ID-121733.

Bodell, J.M., and D.S. Chapman. (1982). Heat flow in the North-Central Colorado Plateau.
Journal of Geophysical Research 87: 2869-2884.

Boore, D.M., J.P. Stewart, E. Seyhan, and G. Atkinson. (2014). NGA-West2 equations for
predicting PGA, PGV, and 5% damped PSA for shallow crustal earthquakes. Earthquake
Spectra 30(3): 1057-1085.

Brumbaugh, D.S. (2005). Active faulting and seismicity in a prefractured terrane: Grand Canyon,
Arizona. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 95: 1561-1566.

Campell K.W., and Y. Bozorgnia. (2014). NGA-West2 Ground Motion Model for the Average
Horizontal Components of PGA, PGV, and 5% Damped Linear Acceleration Response
Spectra. Earthquake Spectra 30(3).

Chiou. B.S.-J., and R.R. Youngs. (2014). Update of the Chiou and Youngs NGA Model for the
Average Horizontal Component of Peak Ground Motion and Response Spectra.
Earthquake Spectra 30 (3): 1117–1153.

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy). (1989). Technical Approach Document: Revision II,
Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action Project. Washington D.C.

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy). (1991a). Remedial Action Plan and Final Design for
Stabilization of the Inactive Uranium Mill Tailings at Green River, Utah.

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy). (1991b). Remedial Action Plan and Site Design for
Stabilization of the Inactive Uranium Mill Tailings Site at Grand Junction, Colorado.

Halling, M.W., J.R. Keaton, L.R. Anderson, and W. Kohler. (2002). Deterministic Maximum
Peak Bedrock Acceleration Maps for Utah. Utah Geological Survey Miscellaneous
Publication 02-11, July.

Huntoon, P.W. (1982). The Meander anticline, Canyonlands, Utah, an unloading structure
resulting from horizontal gliding on salt. Geologic Society of America Bulletin 93:
941- 950.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Seismic Hazard Analysis Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

November 7, 2023 15 Engineering Analytics, Inc.
Hydro-Engineering, LLC. (2005). Tailings Tailing Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan
for Shootaring Canyon Uranium Project – 2005 Garfield County, Utah . Amended
December 2005. Revised April 2007.

Idriss, I.M. (2014). An NGA-West2 empirical model for estimating the horizontal spectral values
generated by shallow crustal earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra 30(3): 1155-1177.

International Code Council, Inc. (2021). International Building Code.

Keller, G.R., L.W. Braile, and P. Morgan. (1979). Crustal structure, geophysical models and
contemporary tectonism of the Colorado Plateau. Tectonophysics 61:131-147.

Kelley, V.C. (1979). Tectonics of the Colorado Plateau and new interpretation of its eastern
boundary. Tectonophysics 61: 97-102.

Morgan P., and C.A. Swanberg. (1985). On the Cenozoic uplift and tectonic stability of the
Colorado Plateau. Journal of Geodynamic 3: 39-63.

Mueller, C.S. (2019). Earthquake Catalogs for the USGS National Seismic Hazard Maps
February.

National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program. (2003). Recommended Provisions for
Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures (FEMA 450).

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in NUREG/CR-6372. (1997). Recommendations for
Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis: Guidance on Uncertainty and Use of Experts
April.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in 10 CFR Appendix A to Part 100 – Seismic and
Geologic Siting Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). 10 CFR Appendix A to Part 40 – Criteria Relating to
the Operation of Uranium Mills and the Disposition of Tailings or Wastes Produced by
the Extraction or Concentration of Source Material From Ores Processed Primarily for
Their Source Material Content, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-
collections/cfr/part040/part040-appa.html (Accessed September 2023).

Oviatt, C.G. (1988). Evidence for Quaternary deformation in the Salt Valley anticline,
southeastern Utah. Utah Geological Survey Bulletin 122: 61-76.

Paster, T.P. Ph.D. (2002). Petrographic Analyses of Andesite and Sandstone to be Used as
Erosion Protection for a Reclaimed Uranium Tailings Facility. August 19.Peterson,
M.D., A.M. Shumway, P.M. Powers, et al. (2020). The 2018 Update of the US National
Seismic Hazard Model: Overview of model and implications, Earthquake Spectra 36(1).
February.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Seismic Hazard Analysis Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

November 7, 2023 16 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

Plateau Resources, Ltd and Hydro-Engineering, LLC. (2007). Tailings Management Plan,
Amended December, 2005, Revised April, 2007 for Shootaring Canyon Uranium
Processing Facility. Prepared for Utah Department of Environmental Quality,
Division of Radiation Control. Report Dated April, 2007.

Risk Engineering. (2023). EZ-FRISK Version: 8.07, Software for Earthquake Ground Motion
Estimation.

Rukstales, K.S., and M.D. Petersen. (2019). Data Release for 2018 Update of the U.S. National
Seismic Hazard Model: U.S. Geological Survey data release.

Smith, R.B. (1978). Seismicity, crustal structure and interplate tectonics of the interior of the
western Cordillera, in Smith, R.B., and Eaton, G.P., eds., Cenozoic Tectonics and
Regional Geophysics of the Western Cordillera: Geological Society of America
Memoir 152: 111-144.

Spudich, W.B., W.B. Joyner, A.G. Lindh, D.M. Boore, B.M. Margaris, and J.B. Fletcher. (1999).
SEA99: A Revised Ground Motion Prediction Relation for Use in Extensional Tectonic
Regimes, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 89(5): 1156-1170.

Tetra Tech. (2008). Final Draft Shootaring Canyon Uranium Mill Tailings Facility Design
Report. Revised December.

Thornbury, M. (1965). Regional Geomorphology of the United States, John Wiley and Sons,
Inc., New York.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 40 CFR 192, Standards for the Control of Residual
Radioactive Materials from Inactive Uranium Processing Sites,
http://cfr.vlex.com/vid/192-02-standards-19817845 (Accessed September 2023).

U.S. Geological Survey, Colorado Geological Survey, Idaho Geological Survey, and Utah
Geological Survey, Quaternary fault and fold database for the United States,
http//earthquake.usgs.gov/regional/qfaults/ (Accessed 2023).

Weichert, D. (1980). Estimation of the earthquake recurrence parameters for unequal observation
periods for different magnitudes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 70(4):
1337-1346.

Wells, D.L. and K.J. Coppersmith. (1994). New empirical relationships among magnitude,
rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bulletin of the
Seismological Society of America 84(4): 974-1002.

Wong, 1. G., and D.S. Chapman. (1986). Deep intraplate earthquakes in the intermountain U.S.:
Implications to thermal and stress conditions in the lower crust and upper mantle,
Earthquake Notes 57: 6.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Seismic Hazard Analysis Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

November 7, 2023 17 Engineering Analytics, Inc.
Wong I.G., and D.S. Chapman. (1990). Deep intraplate earthquakes in the western U.S. and
their relationship to lithospheric temperatures. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of
America 80: 589-599.

Wong, I.G., and J.R. Humphrey. (1989). Contemporary seismicity, faulting, and the state of
stress in the Colorado Plateau, Geological Society of America Bulletin 101: 1127-
1146.

Wong, I.G., S.S. Olig, and J.D.J. Bott. (1996). Earthquake potential and seismic hazards in the
Paradox Basin, southeastern Utah, in A.C. Huffman, W.R. Lund, and L.H. Godwin,
eds., Geology and Resources of the Paradox Basin, 1996 Special Symposium, Utah
Geological Association and Four Corners Geological Society Guidebook 25: 241-250.

Wong, I.G., S.S. Olig, B.W. Hassinger, and R.E. Blubaugh. (1997). Earthquake hazards in the
Intermountain U.S.: issues relevant to uranium mill tailings disposal. Proceedings of the
Fourth International Conference of Tailings and Mine Waste ’97, Fort Collins, Colorado,
USA, pp. 203-212.

Wong, 1., S. Olig, M. Dober, W. Silva, D. Wright, P. Thomas, N. Gregor, A. Sanford, K. Lin,
and D. Love. (2004). Earthquake scenario and probabilistic ground-shaking hazard
maps for the Albuquerque-Belen-Santa Fe, New Mexico corridor. New Mexico
Geology 26(1): 3-33.

Woodward-Clyde Consultants. (1978). Environmental Report, Shootaring Canyon Uranium
Project, Garfield County. Prepared for Plateau Resources Limited. Revised June 16,
1980.

Woodward-Clyde Consultants. (1996). Evaluation and Potential Seismic and Salt
Dissolution Hazards at the Atlas Uranium Mill Tailings Site, Moab, Utah,
Oakland, California, unpublished Consultant's report for Smith Environmental
Technologies and Atlas Corporation, SK9407.

Zoback, M. L., and M.D. Zoback. (1989). Tectonic stress field of the continental United
States, in Pakiser, L.C., and Mooney, W.D., eds., Geophysical Framework of the
Continental United States: Geological Society of America Memoir 172: 523-540.
TABLES

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Seismic Hazard Analysis

November 2023 T-1 Engineering Analytics, Inc.
Table C-1 Minimum Criteria for Faults Considered in Seismic Investigation (NRC 10
CFR Appendix A to Part 100)
Distance from Facility
(mi) (km)
Minimum length of fault to
be considered
(mi) (km)
0 – 20 (0-32) 1 (1.6)
20 – 50 (32.2-80.5) 5 (8.0)
50 – 100 (80.5-160.9) 10 (16.1)
100 – 150 (160.9-241.4) 20 (32.2)
150 – 200 (241.4-321.9) 40 (64.4)
Note: The numbers listed in parentheses are in kilometers.

Table C-2 Completeness Periods and Event Counts Used in Recurrence Calculations
Magnitude Range
(Mw)
Completeness Period1 Number of
Earthquakes in
300km radius
4.0 – < 5 1/1963 – 09/2023 46
5.0 – < 6 1/1930 – 09/2023 11
> 6.0 1/1850 – 09/2023 2
Note:
1) Completeness periods from Peterson and others (2020)

Table C-3 National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) Site Class
Definitions
Soil Profile Type Average Shear Wave Velocity to 30-meter Depth (Vs)
A – Hard Rock > 1500 m/s
B – Rock 760 < vs < 1500 m/s
C – Very Dense Soil and Soft Rock 360 < vs < 760 m/s
D – Stiff Soil Profile 180 < vs < 360 m/s
E – Soft Soil Profile < 180 m/s

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Seismic Hazard Analysis

November 2023 T-2 Engineering Analytics, Inc.
Table C-4 Hazard Contribution to Total Mean Hazard for 10,000-year Return Period,
Probabilistic Analysis
Source Name USGS Fault
ID Number
Distance from
Facility (km)
Peak Ground
Acceleration
(10,000-year
return period)
Extensional Gridded --- --- 0.10
300km Circle around
Shootaring --- --- 0.21
Fault 1 Bright Angel Fault
System 2514 9 <0.01
Fault 2 Bright Angel Fault
System 2514 13 <0.01
Fault 3 Bright Angel Fault
System 2514 35 <0.01
Shay Graben 2513 88 <0.01
Aquarius and Awapa Plateaus
Faults 2505 89 <0.01
Thousand Lake Fault 2506 91 <0.01
Total Hazard1 --- --- 0.25
Note:
1) The total hazard PGA is the PGA for a specific return period considering the sources all together. Refer to Figure
4-5 for a visual explanation of individual source PGAs and the total hazard for the Facility.
FIGURES

November 2023
FIGURE C-1
PROJECT LOCATION
SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM FACILITY
Project No. 110444
Shootaring Canyon
Uranium Facility
)
9
87
6 5 4
3 2
1
0
626160
59
5857 56
55 54
53
5251
50
49 48 47
4645
44
4140
39 383736
353433 3231 302928272625
242322
21
20
1918
1716 15
14
13
12
11 10
9
8
7
6
5 4
3
2
1
0
5
4
3
2 1
0
FIGURE C-2
HISTORICAL EARTHQUAKES WITH MAGNITUDE GREATER THAN 4.0 WITHIN 300 KILOMETERS
SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM FACILITY
Project No. 110444T:
\
1
1
0
4
4
4

S
h
o
o
t
a
r
i
n
g
\
G
I
S
\
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
\
F
i
g

C
-
2

E
a
r
t
h
q
u
a
k
e
s

3
0
0
k
m
.
m
x
d

D
a
t
e

S
a
v
e
d
:

N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
,

0
7
,

2
0
2
3
LEGEND
WUS Earthquake Location
CEUS Earthquake Location
NEIC Earthquake Location
)Shootaring Site
300 Kilometer Radius
Moment Magnitude
4.00 - 4.90
4.91 - 5.90
5.91 - 6.90
November 2023
0 90 18045
Kilometers
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,
Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp.,
GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN,
GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance
Note: Earthquake number cooresponds to
Attachment C2.1 list of earthquakes
)
4
3
2
1
0
9
8
7
6
5
4
32
1
0
25
242322
2120
19
1817
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
2
1 0
FIGURE C-3
HISTORICAL EARTHQUAKES WITH MAGNITUDE GREATER THAN 2.4 WITHIN 100 KILOMETERS
SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM FACILITY
Project No. 110444T:
\
1
1
0
4
4
4

S
h
o
o
t
a
r
i
n
g
\
G
I
S
\
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
\
F
i
g

C
-
3

E
a
r
t
h
q
u
a
k
e
s

1
0
0
k
m
.
m
x
d

D
a
t
e

S
a
v
e
d
:

N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
,

0
7
,

2
0
2
3
LEGEND
WUS Earthquake Location
CEUS Earthquake Location
NEIC Earthquake Location
)Shootaring Site
100 Kilometer Radius
Moment Magnitude
2.40 - 2.90
2.91 - 3.90
3.91 - 4.90
November 2023
0 30 6015
Kilometers
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,
Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp.,
GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN,
GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance
Note: Earthquake number cooresponds to
Attachment C2.2 list of earthquakes
)
24
5
0
2
4
5
3
99
8
9
9
4
25
0
4
22
8
6
9
9
3
23
5
5
2
4
4
9
25
0
6
25
1
4
22
6
9
24
8
9
2
4
4
5
2473
99
7
25
1
1
2263
2457
24
3
6
24
9
2
228
8
2513
25
3
5
24
6
0
23
5
1
2
4
7
6
2
4
5
1
250
7
24
8
5
993
99
1
99
8
99
4
251
4
2474
9
9
3
10
0
2
253
7
FIGURE C-4
FAULTS WITH QUATERNARY DISPLACEMENT THAT MEET NRC MINIMUM CRITERIA WITHIN 300 KILOMETERS OF THE FACILITY
SHOOTARTING CANYON URANIUM FACILITY
Project No. 110444T:
\
1
1
0
4
4
4

S
h
o
o
t
a
r
i
n
g
\
G
I
S
\
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
\
F
i
g

C
-
4

F
a
u
l
t
s

w
i
t
h
i
n

3
0
0
k
m
.
m
x
d

D
a
t
e

S
a
v
e
d
:

N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
,

0
7
,

2
0
2
3
LEGEND
Quaternary Faults and Folds
300 Kilometer Radius
)Shootaring Site
November 2023
0 90 18045
Kilometers
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,
Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp.,
GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN,
GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance
Note: Fault number cooresponds to fault ID
listed in Attachment C3.1
2500
2501
2505
992
Fault 1
Fault 2
Fault 3
November 2023
FIGURE C-5
TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION OF EARTHQUAKES WITHIN THE 300 KILOMETER RADIUS AROUND THE FACILITY
SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM FACILITY
Project No. 110444
November 2023
FIGURE C-6
RECURRENCE CURVE FOR EARTHQUAKES WITHIN THE 300 KILOMETER RADIUS AROUND THE FACILITY
SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM FACILITY
Project No. 110444
November 2023
FIGURE C-7
TOTAL SEISMIC HAZARD CURVE
SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM FACILITY
Project No. 110444
November 2023
FIGURE C-8
SOURCE CONTRIBUTION TO TOTAL SEISMIC HAZARD
SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM FACILITY
Project No. 110444
ATTACHMENT C1
USGS NATIONAL SEISMIC HAZARD MAPS FROM 1996

ATTACHMENT C2
EARTHQUAKE EVENTS NEAR THE FACILITY

ATTACHMENT C2.1
EARTHQUAKE EVENTS WITH A MAGNITUDE
GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 4.0 OCCURING
WITHIN 300 KILOMETERS OF THE FACILITY

Attachment C2.1
Catalog: Western United States (WUS) Magnitude greater than or equal to 4.0
Figure 3-1
ID
Magnitude
(Mw)
Longitude
(degree, west)
Latitude
(degree, north)
Depth
(km)Year Month Day Hour Minute Second Catalog
0 4.79 -111.60 35.20 0 1892 2 2 8 30 0 PDE
1 6.33 -111.70 35.20 0 1906 1 25 21 32 30 PDE
2 5.00 -111.50 35.50 0 1959 10 13 8 15 0 PDE
3 5.28 -112.11 35.60 10 1993 4 29 8 21 0.7 PDE
4 5.87 -111.50 35.80 0 1910 9 24 4 5 0 SLU
5 4.40 -111.60 35.80 34 1966 10 3 16 3 50.9 SRA
6 4.00 -112.26 35.95 5 1989 3 5 0 40 30.8 USH
7 4.20 -112.36 35.96 5 1992 3 14 5 13 31.6 SRA
8 4.10 -112.22 35.96 5 1995 4 17 8 23 46.2 SLU
9 4.00 -112.22 35.98 5 1992 7 5 18 17 29.9 PDE
10 6.00 -111.50 36.00 0 1912 8 18 21 12 0 PDE
11 4.79 -112.10 36.00 0 1935 1 10 8 10 0 SRA
12 4.20 -111.60 36.15 33 1967 9 4 23 27 46.2 PDE
13 4.30 -113.50 36.30 0 1936 1 22 3 38 0 SLU
14 5.60 -112.37 36.80 0 1959 7 21 17 39 29 SLU
15 4.50 -112.40 36.90 26 1962 2 15 7 12 42.9 SLU
16 4.70 -113.50 37.00 0 1949 11 2 2 29 38 PDE
17 4.40 -112.90 37.00 21 1962 2 15 9 6 45.1 SRA
18 5.61 -113.47 37.09 15 1992 9 2 10 26 20.9 PDE
19 4.79 -112.50 37.10 0 1887 12 5 15 30 0 SRA
20 5.77 -113.50 37.40 0 1902 11 17 19 50 0 PDE
21 4.10 -113.20 37.40 33 1965 1 18 20 8 14.4 SRA
22 4.00 -113.29 37.42 5 1995 6 8 8 29 16.5 SLU
23 4.28 -113.92 37.51 5 2016 1 15 22 37 26 SLU
24 4.60 -113.30 37.59 1 1981 4 5 5 40 39.7 SRA
25 5.00 -113.07 37.68 0 1942 8 30 22 8 0 PDE
26 4.00 -113.20 37.70 32 1963 2 17 17 34 28.9 SRA
27 4.11 -112.11 37.81 17 2012 4 12 3 29 22 SRA
28 5.00 -112.83 37.84 0 1933 1 20 13 10 0 USH
29 4.20 -112.49 37.97 2 1998 6 18 11 0 40 PDE
30 4.10 -111.85 37.98 7 1966 5 20 13 40 47.9 USH
31 4.70 -113.30 38.00 0 1936 9 21 6 20 0 USH
32 4.50 -112.10 38.00 33 1962 6 5 22 29 45 USH
33 4.30 -112.33 38.08 5 1994 9 6 3 48 37.6 SLU
34 4.00 -112.73 38.08 6 1999 10 22 17 51 15 USH
35 4.52 -112.46 38.18 16 1998 1 2 7 28 29 SLU
36 4.70 -107.60 38.20 25 1962 2 5 14 45 51.1 USH
37 4.20 -113.16 38.20 7 1966 10 21 7 13 48.9 USH
38 4.90 -107.42 38.21 0 1960 10 11 8 5 30.5 USH
39 4.60 -112.37 38.26 8 2011 1 3 12 6 36 USH
40 5.00 -113.01 38.39 0 1908 4 15 0 0 0 USH
41 5.56 -112.16 38.54 7 1967 10 4 10 20 12.8 USH
42 4.40 -112.17 38.65 7 1972 1 3 10 20 38.9 USH
43 4.00 -112.07 38.67 7 1972 6 2 3 15 48.2 SHM
44 5.94 -112.10 38.70 0 1901 11 14 4 32 0 USH
45 4.79 -112.10 38.70 0 1910 1 10 13 0 0 USH
46 5.77 -112.10 38.70 0 1921 10 1 15 32 0 PCH
47 4.00 -112.04 38.71 5 1982 5 24 12 13 26.6 PCH
48 4.10 -112.19 38.72 33 1969 6 18 4 26 37.7 PCH
49 4.24 -112.56 38.73 10 2001 2 23 21 43 50 PCH
50 4.17 -111.55 38.74 2 2001 7 19 20 15 34 PCH
51 5.00 -111.99 38.77 0 1945 11 18 1 15 0 CMT
52 4.40 -111.55 38.78 0 1992 6 24 7 31 20.2 USH
53 5.30 -111.61 38.82 24 1989 1 30 4 6 22.7 CMT
54 4.20 -111.51 39.15 10 1973 7 16 6 36 42.8 USH
55 4.40 -112.01 39.24 1 1986 3 24 22 40 23.4 USH
56 4.02 -111.44 39.45 5 2014 6 29 0 56 22 CMT
57 4.98 -111.91 39.53 7 1963 7 7 19 20 39.6 USH
58 4.13 -111.88 39.55 2 2003 4 17 1 4 19 USH
59 4.20 -111.97 39.94 5 1980 5 24 10 3 36.3 USH
60 5.28 -112.10 40.00 0 1900 8 1 7 45 0 USH
61 5.00 -112.00 40.00 0 1950 2 25 13 37 37 USH
62 4.00 -111.19 40.03 7 1963 7 9 20 25 25.8 USH
Earthquake Events with Magnitude Great than or equal to 4.0 occurring within 300 kilometers of the
Facility
Attachment C2.1
Catalog: Central Eastern United States (CEUS) Magnitude greater than or equal to 4.0
Figure 3-1
ID
Magnitude
(Mw)
Longitude
(degree, west)
Latitude
(degree, north)
Depth
(km)Year Month Day Hour Minute Second Catalog
0 5.00 -111.10 36.00 0 1910 9 24 4 5 0 SHM|Pancha(Mw5.0)
1 4.01 -109.50 35.70 0 1950 1 17 0 51 0 USH|i0,06
2 4.28 -110.33 39.44 7 1963 4 24 13 33 3 SRA|mb,4.6neic
3 4.18 -111.22 38.10 7 1963 9 30 9 17 39 SRA|mb,4.5neic
4 4.20 -110.20 39.40 30 1964 6 6 12 46 59 PDE|du,4.2
5 4.18 -110.35 39.44 7 1965 1 14 12 30 10 SRA|mb,4.5neic
6 4.18 -107.75 38.32 33 1967 4 4 22 53 39 SRA|mb,4.5neic
7 4.08 -108.65 39.27 5 1975 1 30 14 48 40 SRA|mb,4.4neic
8 5.18 -110.87 39.13 10 1988 8 14 20 3 3 USH|mb,5.5neic
9 4.08 -107.98 38.15 10 1994 9 13 6 1 23 PDE|mb,4.4neic
Earthquake Events with Magnitude Great than or equal to 4.0 occurring within 300 kilometers of the
Facility
Attachment C2.1
Catalog: NEIC Magnitude greater than or equal to 4.0
Figure 3-1
ID Magnitude Magnitude
Type
Longitude
(degree, west)
Latitude
(degree, north)
Depth
(km)Year Month Day Hour Minute Second
0 4.40 mb -113.50 36.68 10.00 2022 9 19 21 18 14
1 4.32 ml -108.93 38.27 0.02 2020 12 20 2 11 6
2 4.42 ml -112.42 38.09 8.34 2020 10 3 11 47 44
3 4.06 ml -112.76 38.77 1.11 2019 4 14 3 59 54
4 4.49 mw -108.91 38.28 0.76 2019 3 4 17 22 52
5 4.04 ml -112.50 38.74 8.22 2019 2 20 7 5 35
Earthquake Events with Magnitude Great than or equal to 4.0 occurring within 300 kilometers of
the Facility
ATTACHMENT C2.2
EARTHQUAKE EVENTS WITH A MAGNITUDE
GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 2.4 OCCURING
WITHIN 100 KILOMETERS OF THE FACILITY

Attachment C2.2
Catalog: Western United States (WUS) Magnitude greater than or equal to 2.4
Figure 3-2
ID
Magnitude
(Mw)
Longitude
(degree, west)
Latitude
(degree, north)
Depth
(km)Year Month Day Hour Minute Second Catalog
0 3.7 -111.72 37.87 7 1970 4 18 10 42 11.5 SRA|ml,3.70ML_UU
1 3.2 -111.77 37.89 0 2005 8 20 12 21 14 PDE|ml,3.20MLSLC
2 2.7 -111.64 38.01 7 1982 8 25 13 29 9.4 SRA|ml,2.70ML_UU
Catalog: Central Eastern United States (CEUS) Magnitude greater than or equal to 2.4
Figure 3-2
ID
Magnitude
(Mw)
Longitude
(degree, west)
Latitude
(degree, north)
Depth
(km)Year Month Day Hour Minute Second Catalog
0 4.18 -111.22 38.10 7 1963 9 30 9 17 39 SRA|mb,4.5neic
1 3.48 -110.17 37.83 7 1967 2 1 20 15 10 SRA|mb,3.8neic
2 3.48 -111.02 37.88 7 1979 4 30 2 7 10 SRA|ml,3.80ML_GS
3 3.18 -110.93 37.89 7 1979 10 23 4 17 19 SRA|ml,3.50ML_UU
4 2.78 -110.56 37.50 2 1981 9 10 7 55 9 SRA|md,3.10MD_UU
5 2.68 -111.30 38.22 9 1982 4 17 6 0 12 SRA|ml,3.00ML_UU
6 2.98 -110.67 37.78 7 1983 1 27 23 37 11 SRA|md,3.30MD_UU
7 2.68 -110.63 38.31 2 1983 5 3 12 43 37 SRA|md,3.00MD_UU
8 2.88 -110.32 37.29 8 1986 5 14 15 2 55 SRA|ml,3.20ML_GS
9 3.68 -110.57 37.42 5 1986 8 22 13 26 33 SRA|ml,4.00ML_UU
10 2.68 -110.30 37.43 1 1986 11 7 1 31 53 SRA|md,3.00MD_UU
11 2.58 -111.23 37.89 15 1988 8 8 15 9 53 PDE|ml,2.90MLGS
12 3.18 -111.43 37.68 9 1991 1 26 21 49 38 PDE|ml,3.50MLGS
13 2.68 -110.36 37.21 1 1991 6 25 21 2 13 PDE|md,3.00MDSLC
14 2.68 -111.35 38.25 3 1998 3 29 12 12 42 PDE|mb,3.0neic
15 2.68 -110.53 37.41 3 2002 9 26 10 32 10 PDE|ml,3.00MLSLC
16 2.58 -110.56 38.32 4 2003 12 29 1 4 34 PDE|ml,2.90MLSLC
17 2.68 -110.45 37.66 7 2009 3 31 2 36 10 PDE|ml,3.00MLSLC
18 2.58 -110.42 37.65 0 2009 4 14 19 58 19 PDE|ml,2.90MLSLC
19 2.98 -110.77 37.01 3 2009 7 13 3 40 37 PDE|ml,3.30MLSLC
20 3.71 -111.11 38.00 16 2010 4 14 18 58 45 SLU|wo,3.71
21 2.68 -111.08 38.01 0 2012 6 22 5 37 14 PDE|ml,3.00MLSLC
22 2.56 -111.30 37.77 18 2014 10 27 23 29 27 PDE|ml,2.88ml,uu
23 3.45 -110.64 37.76 14 2016 3 1 19 7 2 PDE|ml,3.77ml,uu
24 2.56 -110.53 37.74 8 2016 10 18 15 24 40 PDE|ml,2.88ml,uu
25 2.61 -110.46 37.61 6 2017 3 18 1 9 2 PDE|ml,2.93ml,uu
Catalog: NEIC Magnitude greater than or equal to 2.4
Figure 3-2
ID Magnitude Magnitude Type Longitude
(degree, west)
Latitude
(degree,
north)
Depth
(km)Year Month Day Hour Minute Second
0 2.4 ml -110.56 37.42 2022 3 27 18 50 23.11
1 2.47 ml -110.58 37.41 21.33 2020 10 8 1 26 22.84
2 3.13 ml -111.14 38.05 19.72 2020 6 25 11 58 43.58
3 3.41 ml -110.52 37.49 6 2018 10 27 10 34 24.46
4 2.65 md -110.52 37.51 6.1 2018 8 16 18 36 1.11
Earthquake Events with Magnitude Great than or equal to 2.4 occurring within 100 kilometers of the
Facility
ATTACHMENT C3
FAULTS WITH QUATERNARY DISPLACEMENT NEAR
THE FACILITY

ATTACHMENT C3.1
LIST OF FAULTS WITHIN 300 KILOMETERS OF THE
FACILITY THAT MEET NRC MINIMUM CRITERIA

Attachment C3.1 List of Faults within 300 Kilometers of the Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Aquarius and Awapa Plateaus faults 2505 <1,600,000 <2.0 55 N 89
Beaver Basin faults, eastern margin faults 2492a <15,000 <2.0 34 N 176
Beaver Basin faults, intrabasin faults 2492b <130,000 <2.0 39 N 184
Big Gypsum Valley graben (Class B)2288 <1,600,000 <2.0 33 N 160
Bright Angel fault zone 991 <1,600,000 <2.0 74 N 192
Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)2514 <1,600,000 <2.0 4 N 9
Central Kaibab fault system 993 <1,600,000 <2.0 71 N 156
Clear Lake fault zone (Class B)2436 <15,000 <2.0 36 N 216
Cricket Mountains (west side) faults 2460 <15,000 <2.0 41 N 239
Eminence fault zone 992 <1,600,000 <2.0 36 N 154
Gunnison fault 2445 <15,000 <2.0 42 N 198
Hurricane fault zone, Anderson Junction section 998c <15,000 0.2-1 61 N 234
Hurricane fault zone, Ash creek section 998b <15,000 <2.0 32 N 217
Hurricane fault zone, cedar city section 998a <15,000 <2.0 45 N 208
Hurricane fault zone, southern section 998f <1,600,000 <2.0 71 N 282
Joes Valley fault zone 2453 <15,000 <2.0 84 N 137
Lisbon Valley fault zone (Class B)2511 <1,600,000 <2.0 37 N 142
Main Street fault zone 1002 <130,000 <2.0 87 N 266
Markagunt Plateau Faults (Class B)2535 <750,000 <2.0 57 N 162
Mineral Mountains (west side) faults 2489 <15,000 <2.0 38 N 204
Moab fault and deformation zones (Class B)2476 <1,600,000 <2.0 68 N 137
Needles fault zone (Class B)2507 <15,000 <2.0 32 N 60
Paradox Valley graben (Class B)2286 <1,600,000 <2.0 56 N 162
Paunsaugunt fault 2504 <1,600,000 <2.0 44 N 114
Price River area faults (Class B)2457 <1,600,000 <2.0 51 N 175
Ryan Creek fault zone 2263 <1,600,000 <2.0 39 N 181
Salt and Cache Valleys faults (Class B)2474 <1,600,000 <2.0 58 N 148
Sevier fault 2355 <1,600,000 <2.0 42 N 140
Sevier Valley faults and fold (Class B)2537 <130,000 <2.0 24 N 145
Sevier Valley-Marysvale-Circleville area faults 2500 <750,000 <2.0 35 N 137
Sevier/Toroweap fault zone, northern Toroweap section 997b <130,000 <2.0 81 N 183
Sevier/Toroweap fault zone, Sevier section 997a <130,000 <2.0 89 N 142
Shay graben fault (Class B)2513 <1,600,000 <2.0 40 N 88
Ten Mile graben faults (Class B)2473 <1,600,000 <2.0 35 N 138
Thousand Lake Fault 2506 <750,000 <2.0 49 N 91
Tushar Mountains (east side) fault 2501 <1,600,000 <2.0 19 N 149
Unnamed faults east of Atkinson Mesa 2269 <1,600,000 <2.0 41 N 196
Valley Mountains monocline (Class B)2449 <1,600,000 <2.0 39 175
Wah Wah Mountains (south end near Lund) fault 2485 <130,000 <2.0 41 N 240
Wasatch fault zone, Nephi section 2351h <15,000 1-5 43 N 242
Wasatch monocline (Class B)2450 <1,600,000 <2.0 104 165
West Kaibab fault system 994 <1,600,000 <2.0 83 N 153
White Mountain area faults 2451 <1,600,000 <2.0 16 N 158
Fault
Type
Distance from
site to surface
trace of fault
(km)
1ya = years ago
Name of Faults ID Number
Age of Most Recent
Prehistoric
Deformation
(ya)1
Slip-rate
(mm/yr)
Fault Length
(Km)
ATTACHMENT C3.2
USGS DESCRIPTION OF FAULTS MEETING THE NRC
MINIMUM CRITERIA

You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)

You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)

You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)

9/19/23, 10:55 AM Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/cfusion/qfault/show_report_AB_archive.cfm?fault_id=2460&section_id=1/3
Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the
United States
As of January 12, 2017, the USGS maintains a limited number of metadata fields that characterize
the Quaternary faults and folds of the United States. For the most up-to-date information, please
refer to the interactive fault map.
Cricket Mountains (west side) fault (Class A) No. 2460
Last Review Date: 2004-07-01
Compiled in cooperation with the Utah Geological Survey
citation for this record: Black, B.D., Hylland, M.D., and Hecker, S., compilers,
2004, Fault number 2460, Cricket Mountains (west side) fault, in Quaternary
fault and fold database of the United States: U.S. Geological Survey website,
https://earthquakes.usgs.gov/hazards/qfaults, accessed 09/19/2023 10:55 AM.
Synopsis Poorly understood late Pleistocene to Holocene fault zone on the west side of
the Cricket Mountains.
Name comments Fault ID: Refers to fault number 9-28 of Hecker (1993 #642).
County(s) and
State(s)MILLARD COUNTY, UTAH
Physiographic
province(s)BASIN AND RANGE
Reliability of
location Good
Compiled at 1:50,000 scale.
Comments: Mapped or discussed by Anderson and Bucknam (1979 #518), Ertec
Western, Inc. (Schell, 1981 #4598), Oviatt (1989 #381), Hintze and Davis (2002
#6755, 2002 #6740, 2003 #6741). Fault traces from mapping of Ertec Western,
Inc. (Schell, 1981 #4598) and Oviatt (1989 #381).
U.S. Geological Survey - Earthquake Hazards Program
9/19/23, 10:55 AM Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/cfusion/qfault/show_report_AB_archive.cfm?fault_id=2460&section_id=2/3
Geologic setting Northeast-trending normal fault zone along the western base of the Cricket
Mountains, east of Sevier Lake. The Cricket Mountains are in the Confusion
Basin of southwestern Utah, a Paleozoic center of deposition. Mountains in the
basin are comprised almost exclusively of sedimentary rocks, valleys contain
lake deposits and alluvium.
Length (km)41 km.
Average strike N17°E
Sense of
movement Normal
Dip Direction W
Paleoseismology
studies
Geomorphic
expression Oviatt (1989 #381) mapped the north end of the fault as cutting alluvial-fan
surfaces modified by wave erosion in Lake Bonneville, and Ertec Western, Inc.
(Schnell, 1981 #2843) indicated that the fault displaces post-Bonneville
alluvium. In contrast, Anderson and Bucknam (1979 #518) observed a fault
scarp with a wave-etched bench, and also beach terraces having no apparent
displacement across the fault. Thus, they interpreted a pre-Bonneville-
highstand age for the fault scarps, despite a morphology that appears younger
than adjacent wave-cut scarps and similar to the Drum Mountain fault scarps
[2432]. The Cricket Mountains scarps have a maximum measured displacement
of 1.3 m.
Age of faulted
surficial deposits Latest Pleistocene to Holocene alluvial-fan deposits and latest Pleistocene
lacustrine beach terraces (shorelines) (Oviatt, 1989 #381; Schell, 1981 #2843;
Anderson and Bucknam, 1979 #518).
Historic
earthquake
Most recent
prehistoric
deformation
latest Quaternary (<15 ka)
Comments: Considered to be less than 15 ka on basis of fault scarp
morphology that appears younger than adjacent wave-cut scarps and similar
to the Drum Mountain fault scarps [2432] (Anderson and Bucknam, 1979 #518)
and apparent deformation of latest Pleistocene to Holocene alluvial-fan
9/19/23, 10:55 AM Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/cfusion/qfault/show_report_AB_archive.cfm?fault_id=2460&section_id=3/3
deposits and latest Pleistocene lacustrine shorelines (Oviatt, 1989 #381; Schell,
1981 #2843).
Recurrence
interval
Slip-rate category Less than 0.2 mm/yr
Date and
Compiler(s)2004
Bill D. Black, Utah Geological Survey
Michael D. Hylland, Utah Geological Survey
Suzanne Hecker, U.S. Geological Survey
References #518 Anderson, R.E., and Bucknam, R.C., 1979, Map of fault scarps in
unconsolidated sediments, Richfield 1° x 2° quadrangle, Utah: U.S. Geological
Survey Open-File Report 79-1236, 15 p. pamphlet, 1 sheet, scale 1:250,000.
#642 Hecker, S., 1993, Quaternary tectonics of Utah with emphasis on
earthquake-hazard characterization: Utah Geological Survey Bulletin 127, 157
p., 6 pls., scale 1:500,000.
#6740 Hintze, L.F., and Davis, F.D., 2002, Geologic map of the Wah Wah
Mountains North 30' x 60' quadrangle and part of the Garrison 30' x 60'
quadrangle, southwest Millard County and part of Beaver County, Utah: Utah
Geological Survey Map 182, 1 sheet, scale 1:100,000.
#6755 Hintze, L.F., and Davis, F.D., 2002, Geologic map of the Delta 30' x 60'
quadrangle and parts of the Lynndyl 30' x 60' quadrangle, northeast Millard
County and parts of Juab, Sanpete, and Sevier Counties, Utah: Utah Geological
Survey Map 184, scale 1:100,000.
#6741 Hintze, L.F., and Davis, F.D., 2003, Geology of Millard County, Utah: Utah
Geological Survey Bulletin 133, 305 p.
#381 Oviatt, C.G., 1989, Quaternary geology of part of the Sevier Desert, Millard
County, Utah: Utah Geological and Mineral Survey Special Studies 70, 41 p., 1
pl., scale 1:100,000.
#4598 Schell, B.A., 1981, MX siting investigation, faults and lineaments in the MX
siting region, Nevada and Utah: Long Beach, California, report no. E-TR-54 for
U.S. Air Force, volume I, 77p.; volume II, variously paginated, scale 1:250,000.

You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)

You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)

You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)

You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)

You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)

You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)

You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)

You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)

You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)

You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)

You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)

You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)

9/19/23, 11:15 AM Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/cfusion/qfault/show_report_AB_archive.cfm?fault_id=2485&section_id=1/3
Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the
United States
As of January 12, 2017, the USGS maintains a limited number of metadata fields that characterize
the Quaternary faults and folds of the United States. For the most up-to-date information, please
refer to the interactive fault map.
Wah Wah Mountains (south end near Lund) fault (Class A) No.
2485
Last Review Date: 1999-10-01
Compiled in cooperation with the Utah Geological Survey
citation for this record: Black, B.D., and Hecker, S., compilers, 1999, Fault
number 2485, Wah Wah Mountains (south end near Lund) fault, in
Quaternary fault and fold database of the United States: U.S. Geological Survey
website, https://earthquakes.usgs.gov/hazards/qfaults, accessed 09/19/2023
11:15 AM.
Synopsis Poorly understood late Quateranry fault zone on the western side of the
Escalante Desert near Lund. The scarps record at least 5.5 m of displacement on
pre-Lake Bonneville alluvial-fan deposits, which suggests multiple faulting
events.
Name comments Fault ID: Refers to fault number 9-34 of Hecker (1993 #642).
County(s) and
State(s)IRON COUNTY, UTAH
BEAVER COUNTY, UTAH
Physiographic
province(s)BASIN AND RANGE
Reliability of
location Good
Compiled at 1:250,000 scale.
Comments: Mapped or discussed by Anderson and Bucknam (1979 #518), Ertec
Western, Inc. (Schell, 1981 #4598), Fugro National, Inc. (1981 #4597), Currey
U.S. Geological Survey - Earthquake Hazards Program
9/19/23, 11:15 AM Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/cfusion/qfault/show_report_AB_archive.cfm?fault_id=2485&section_id=2/3
(1982 #941), and Anderson and Christenson (1989 #828). Fault traces from
1:250,000-scale mapping of Schell (1981 #4598) and Anderson and Christenson
(1989 #828).
Geologic setting This north- to northeast-trending Basin and Range fault zone bounds the
eastern side of the southern Wah Wah Mountains. The Wah Wah Mountains are
in an area of southwestern Utah underlain by extensive extrusive Tertiary
volcanic rocks. In the mountains, volcanic rocks have been eroded to expose
pre-existing Paleozoic and Mesozoic topography. In areas such as Escalante
Desert to the south, igneous rocks have been lowered by faulting and covered
by alluvium and lake deposits.
Length (km)41 km.
Average strike N18°E
Sense of
movement Normal
Dip Direction E
Paleoseismology
studies
Geomorphic
expression Anderson and Bucknam (1979 #518) and Anderson and Christenson (1989 #828)
described scarps in the fault zone as highly dissected, similar to scarps along
the west side of the Mineral Mountains [2489]. The scarps record at least 5.5 m
of displacement, which suggests multiple faulting events.
Age of faulted
surficial deposits Late Pleistocene.
Historic
earthquake
Most recent
prehistoric
deformation
late Quaternary (<130 ka)
Comments: Ertec Western, Inc. (Schell, 1981 #4598) indicated a middle to late
Pleistocene(?) age of last movement on the fault, and Anderson and Bucknam
(1979 #518) observed an unfaulted alluvial fan northwest of Lund that appeared
to be etched by the Bonneville(?) shoreline (suggesting a pre-Bonneville age).
An apparent displacement in modern stream alluvium may represent more
recent faulting event or may be an exhumed fault in water-saturated deposits
(Schell, 1981 #4598); however, the displacement could also be due to
9/19/23, 11:15 AM Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/cfusion/qfault/show_report_AB_archive.cfm?fault_id=2485&section_id=3/3
liquefaction and lateral spreading (B.A. Schell, written commun. to Suzanne
Hecker, 1991). Fugro National, Inc. (1981 #4597) discussed and mapped small
displacements (0.3 m) in Holocene alluvium, and Currey (1982 #941) suggested
that Lake Bonneville sediment may have been deformed by Holocene
movement on the fault. Thus it appears that there is proven late Quaternary
movement, and the faulting may be as young as <15 ka.
Recurrence
interval
Slip-rate category Less than 0.2 mm/yr
Date and
Compiler(s)1999
Bill D. Black, Utah Geological Survey
Suzanne Hecker, U.S. Geological Survey
References #518 Anderson, R.E., and Bucknam, R.C., 1979, Map of fault scarps in
unconsolidated sediments, Richfield 1° x 2° quadrangle, Utah: U.S. Geological
Survey Open-File Report 79-1236, 15 p. pamphlet, 1 sheet, scale 1:250,000.
#828 Anderson, R.E., and Christenson, G.E., 1989, Quaternary faults, folds, and
selected volcanic features in the Cedar City 1° x 2° quadrangle, Utah: Utah
Geological and Mineral Survey Miscellaneous Publication 89-6, 29 p., 1 pl., scale
1:250,000.
#941 Currey, D.R., 1982, Lake Bonneville—Selected features of relevance to
neotectonic analysis: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 82-1070, 30 p., 1
pl., scale 1:1,000,000.
#4597 Fugro National Inc., 1981, MX siting investigation, geotechnical
evaluation, verification study—Pine Valley, Utah, Volume I—Synthesis: Long
Beach, California, consultant's report no. FN-TR-27-PI-I for U.S. Air Force, 48 p.
#642 Hecker, S., 1993, Quaternary tectonics of Utah with emphasis on
earthquake-hazard characterization: Utah Geological Survey Bulletin 127, 157
p., 6 pls., scale 1:500,000.
#4598 Schell, B.A., 1981, MX siting investigation, faults and lineaments in the MX
siting region, Nevada and Utah: Long Beach, California, report no. E-TR-54 for
U.S. Air Force, volume I, 77p.; volume II, variously paginated, scale 1:250,000.

9/19/23, 11:16 AM Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/cfusion/qfault/show_report_AB_archive.cfm?fault_id=2351&section_id=h 1/9
Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the
United States
As of January 12, 2017, the USGS maintains a limited number of metadata fields that characterize
the Quaternary faults and folds of the United States. For the most up-to-date information, please
refer to the interactive fault map.
Wasatch fault zone, Nephi section (Class A) No. 2351h
Last Review Date: 2004-04-01
Compiled in cooperation with the Utah Geological Survey
citation for this record: Black, B.D., DuRoss, C.B., Hylland, M.D., McDonald,
G.N., and Hecker, S., compilers, 2004, Fault number 2351h, Wasatch fault
zone, Nephi section, in Quaternary fault and fold database of the United
States: U.S. Geological Survey website,
https://earthquakes.usgs.gov/hazards/qfaults, accessed 09/19/2023 11:15 AM.
Synopsis General: The Wasatch fault zone is one of the longest and most tectonically
active normal faults in North America. The fault zone shows abundant evidence
of recurrent Holocene surface faulting and has been the subject of detailed
studies for over three decades. Half of the estimated 50 to 120 post-Bonneville
surface-faulting earthquakes in the Wasatch Front region have been on the
Wasatch fault zone. Earthquake-timing, recurrence-interval, and displacement-
rate estimates for the Brigham City, Weber, Salt Lake City, Provo, Nephi, and
Levan sections of the Wasatch fault zone reflect the consensus values of the Utah
Quaternary Fault Parameters Working Group (Lund, 2005 #6733). Lund (2005
#6733) did not evaluate the Clarkston Mountain, Collinston, and Fayette sections
due to a lack of fault-trench data. The preferred values reported in Lund (2005
#6733) approximate mean values based on available paleoseismic-trenching
data, and the minimum and maximum values approximate two-sigma (5th and
95th percentile) confidence limits. The confidence limits incorporate both
epistemic (data limitation) and aleatory (process variability) uncertainty (Lund,
2005 #6733).
Sections: This fault has 10 sections. The nearly 350-km-long Wasatch fault zone
has traditionally been divided into seismogenic segments that are thought to
U.S. Geological Survey - Earthquake Hazards Program
9/19/23, 11:16 AM Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/cfusion/qfault/show_report_AB_archive.cfm?fault_id=2351&section_id=h 2/9
rupture at least somewhat independently. The established model is used to
define the sections described in this report. The southern eight sections are
entirely in Utah. To the north, the Clarkston Mountain section straddles the state
line between Idaho and Utah and the northernmost (Malad City) section is
entirely in Idaho. The chronology of surface-faulting earthquakes on the Wasatch
fault is one of the best dated chronologies in the world and includes 16
earthquakes since 5.6 ka, with an average repeat time of 350 yr. Four of the
central five sections [2351e-h] ruptured in the last hundreds to about a thousand
years ago, whereas the next section to the north, Brigham City [2351d], has not
ruptured in the past 2,125 yr. Vertical displacement rates of 1–2 mm/yr are typical
for the central sections during Holocene time. In contrast, middle and late
Quaternary (<150–250 ka) rates on these sections are about an order of
magnitude lower. This substantial change in the displacement rate may indicate
a causal relation between increased Holocene rates of deformation and isostatic
rebound/crustal relaxation following deep lake cycles such as Bonneville.
Name comments General:
Section: All section names follow those proposed by Machette and others (1991
#189; 1992 #607).
County(s) and
State(s)JUAB COUNTY, UTAH
UTAH COUNTY, UTAH
Physiographic
province(s)BASIN AND RANGE
Reliability of
location Good
Compiled at 1:50,000 scale.
Comments: Fault traces from 1:50,000-scale mapping of Machette (1992 #4529)
and Harty and others (1997 #4619).
Geologic setting Generally north-trending, range-bounding normal fault along the western side of
the Malad Range (Clarkston Mountain), Wellsville Mountains, Wasatch Range,
and San Pitch Mountains. The Wasatch fault zone marks the eastern boundary of
the Basin and Range in northern Utah. Alluvial-fan deposits and lacustrine
deposits of Pleistocene Lake Bonneville dominate the surficial geology along the
fault zone.
Length (km)This section is 43 km of a total fault length of 357 km.
9/19/23, 11:16 AM Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/cfusion/qfault/show_report_AB_archive.cfm?fault_id=2351&section_id=h 3/9
Average strike N4°E (for section) versus N10°W (for whole fault)
Sense of
movement Normal
Dip 72° W
Comments: Measured at the Red Canyon trench in alluvial fan, mudflow, and
fluvial deposits (Jackson, 1991 #4621).
Paleoseismology
studies Hanson and others (1981 #4987) excavated three trenches at North Creek (site
2351-4), about 6 km northeast of the town of Mona (results also summarized in
Schwartz and others, 1983 #558; Schwartz and Coppersmith, 1984 #347;
Machette and others, 1992 #607). Colluvial-wedge stratigraphy exposed in the
trenches indicated two surface-faulting events; an older, third event was inferred
from a tectonic strath terrace incised in an uplied part of the North Creek
alluvial fan. Charcoal obtained from deposits exposed in the trenches, although
not from stratigraphically definitive positions, yielded radiocarbon age estimates
that provide a maximum limiting age for the most recent event; scarp
morphology suggests the age of this event may be considerably younger than
the limiting radiocarbon age estimate. An organic-rich soil that formed on scarp-
derived colluvium deposited aer the penultimate event yielded a radiocarbon
age estimate that provides a minimum limiting age for this event. Radiocarbon
dating of a buried, oset burn layer in the North Creek alluvial-fan deposits
provides a maximum limiting age for the antepenultimate event.
Jackson (1991 #4621) excavated one trench at Red Canyon near the southern end
of the Nephi section (site 2351-23), about 3.5 km north of the town of Nephi. The
trench revealed colluvial-wedge stratigraphy indicating three surface-faulting
events since about 4.5 ka. Thermoluminescence and radiocarbon age estimates
from soil buried by the youngest colluvial wedge provide a maximum limiting
age for the most recent event. Samples collected from colluvial-wedge material
associated with the penultimate event yielded radiocarbon age estimates that
constrain the upper age of this event. A maximum age for the antepenultimate
event is thought to be close to the oldest radiocarbon age estimate for the
colluvium, about 4–4.5 ka.
DuRoss (2004 #6743) completed a regional geomorphic analysis of fault scarps at
20 sites along the length of the Nephi section, which included the profiling and
nonlinear diusion modeling of fault scarps on alluvial fans of four dierent ages.
A preferred rupture scenario integrates the timing and geometry of the surface
ruptures with fault trench data, results of mechanical modeling (Chang, 1998
#6742), and historical Basin and Range surface-faulting data. The scenario
9/19/23, 11:16 AM Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/cfusion/qfault/show_report_AB_archive.cfm?fault_id=2351&section_id=h 4/9
involves at least six ruptures on the Nephi section since the latest Pleistocene
(~12 ka), including two complete ruptures of the section, and four partial
ruptures along either the Nephi or Santaquin fault strands.
Geomorphic
expression The Nephi section is divided into two fault strands separated by a connecting
fault in bedrock: (1) the 25-km-long southern (Nephi) strand and (2) the 17-km-
long northern (Santaquin) strand (DuRoss, 2004 #6743). The northern half of the
Santaquin strand overlaps the southern part of the Provo section at the Payson
salient. The Benjamin fault forms the west side of the salient and displacement
dies out as the fault extends northward into Utah Valley (Harty and others, 1997
#4619). Sediments of the Provo phase of the Bonneville lake cycle are displaced
up to 2 m along this fault (Machette, 1992 #4529). The southern section boundary
is at a 5-km gap in Quaternary surface faulting (Hylland and Machette, 2004
#6745) in the vicinity of a large alluvial fan (Levan Ridge) that extends westward
from the San Pitch Mountains. Gravity data suggest the fault continues through
and beneath Levan Ridge, but has been inactive for perhaps tens of thousands of
years (Zoback, 1983 #213; Machette and others, 1992 #607). Faults associated
with young scarps north of the town of Nephi are probably continuous with near
surface faults in the town identified from seismic-reflection data (Crone and
Harding, 1984 #4545). A number of small faults in Quaternary deposits have been
identified on the western flank of the Gunnison Plateau east of Nephi (Biek, 1991
#4614).
Fault scarps vertically displace unconsolidated Quaternary alluvial-fan and
lacustrine deposits up to 27 m on the Nephi strand (Mattson and Bruhn, 2001
#6746) and up to 16 m on the Santaquin strand (DuRoss, 2004 #6743).
Displacement due to the most recent event is 1.2–2.2 m along the Nephi strand
and 0.9–1.1 m along the Santaquin strand (DuRoss, 2004 #6743). Vertical
displacement per event is estimated at 1.4–2.5 m for the last three surface-
faulting earthquakes, based on trench studies on the Nephi strand. DuRoss (2004
#6743) indicates 1.4–2.2 m of displacement per event since the latest Pleistocene
(~12 ka), based on regional fault-scarp analyses along both strands
Age of faulted
surficial
deposits
Holocene alluvial fan, debris-flow and stream deposits; late Pleistocene alluvial
fan deposits, and middle (?) Pleistocene alluvial fan deposits (Harty and others,
1997 #4619).
Historic
earthquake
Most recent
prehistoric
deformation
latest Quaternary (<15 ka)
9/19/23, 11:16 AM Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/cfusion/qfault/show_report_AB_archive.cfm?fault_id=2351&section_id=h 5/9
Comments: In a review of available paleoseismic data for the southern (Nephi)
strand, including the evaluation of earthquake timing by McCalpin and Nishenko
(1996 #4436), Lund (2005 #6733) reported the following paleoearthquake
chronology, which incorporates both the geologic and laboratory uncertainty: Z
<1±0.4 ka, but possibly as young as 0.4±0.1 ka Y ~3.9±0.5 ka X >3.9±0.5 ka,
<5.3±0.7 ka
Scarp morphology and continuity suggest very recent displacement (~300 500
years ago), although a combination of 14C and TL dates suggest an age of about
1.2 ka for the most recent event (event Z). Schwartz and Coppersmith (1984
#347) determined that the penultimate event (event Y) occurred before about 4
ka, whereas Jackson (1991 #4621) constrained the event between about 3 and
3.5 ka. Event X may have occurred between 4 and 4.5 ka (Jackson, 1991 #4621).
Thus, actual middle to late Holocene recurrence intervals may vary from less
than 1 to more than 3 k.y. Three middle to late Holocene events post date a late
Pleistocene (?) fan at the southern end of the section (at Red Canyon), suggesting
a possible hiatus in faulting activity during latest Pleistocene to early Holocene
time (Jackson, 1991 #4621). The preferred rupture scenario of DuRoss (2004
#6743), based on rupture mapping and scarp morphology, includes two
paleoearthquakes that ruptured the entire section around 10–15 ka and 5.5–8.5
ka. Also, partial rupture of the Nephi section may have occurred during the
Holocene, with the southern (Nephi) strand rupturing at 2.5–5.5 ka and 0.9–1.9
ka, and the northern (Santaquin) strand at 1.9–3.3 ka and 0.4–0.6 ka (DuRoss,
2004 #6743). DuRoss (2004 #6743) concluded that surface faulting on the Provo
section to the north may have triggered the two most recent ruptures on the
Santaquin strand. This inference is based on the moderate rupture length (6.5
km) and displacement (1–2 m) associated with the youngest Santaquin-strand
earthquakes, the similarity in the timing of those events (mean ages of 2.6 and
0.5 ka, based on scarp diusion modeling) with the two youngest Provo-section
events (~2.8 and ~0.6 ka, based on fault trench data; Lund and Black, 1998
#4624), and the geometry of the Payson salient, which may allow the transfer of
slip from the Provo section to the Santaquin strand (DuRoss and Bruhn, 2005
#6744).
Recurrence
interval 2500 yr (preferred); minimum 1200, maximum 4800 yr (<5.3 ka)
Comments: Consensus recurrence-interval range reported in Lund (2005 #6733),
based on the two interevent times between the three youngest
paleoearthquakes (X-Z).
Slip-rate
category Between 1.0 and 5.0 mm/yr
9/19/23, 11:16 AM Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/cfusion/qfault/show_report_AB_archive.cfm?fault_id=2351&section_id=h 6/9
Comments: Lund (2005 #6733) indicates a Holocene vertical displacement rate of
1.1 mm/yr (preferred), and a consensus minimum-maximum range of 0.5–3.0
mm/yr. The displacement-rate estimate incorporates displacement
measurements from fault trench exposures and fault scarps, a geologic vertical
displacement rate of 1.3 mm/yr based on 7.0 m of displacement across an
alluvial fan dated at 5.3 ka (Hanson and others, 1981 #4987; Schwartz and
Coppersmith, 1984 #347), and paleoseismic rate estimates ranging from 0.5–1.2
mm/yr made by Harty and others (1997 #4619). Jackson (1991 #4621) indicates
that displacement, and thus the rate of slip, decreases toward the southern end
of the segment near Red Canyon. DuRoss and Bruhn (2005 #6744) report a
paleoseismic vertical displacement rate of 0.5–0.7 mm/yr since the mid-
Holocene (<7 ka) and 0.3–0.4 mm/yr from the mid-Holocene to latest Pleistocene
(~12 ka), using closed seismic cycles of a preferred rupture scenario. DuRoss and
Bruhn (2005 #6744) indicate a long-term paleoseismic vertical displacement rate
of 0.2 mm/yr from ~12–53 ka.
Date and
Compiler(s)2004
Bill D. Black, Utah Geological Survey
Christopher B. DuRoss, Utah Geological Survey
Michael D. Hylland, Utah Geological Survey
Greg N. McDonald, Utah Geological Survey
Suzanne Hecker, U.S. Geological Survey
References #4614 Biek, R.F., 1991, Provisional Geologic Map of the Nephi quadrangle, Juab
County, Utah: Utah Geological Survey Map 137, 21 p. pamphlet, scale 1:24,000.
#8531 Bruhn, R.L., DuRoss, C.B., Harris, R.A., and Lund, W.R., 2005, Neotectonics
and paleoseimology of the Wastach fault, Utah: Geological Society of America
Field Guide 6, p. 231–250.
#6742 Chang, W.L., 1998, Earthquake hazards on the Wasatch fault—Tectonically
induced flooding and stress triggering of earthquakes: Salt Lake City, University
of Utah, unpublished M.S. thesis, 123 p.
#4545 Crone, A.J., and Harding, S.T., 1984, Near-surface faulting associated with
Holocene fault scarps, Wasatch fault zone, Utah—A preliminary report, in Hays,
W.W., and Gori, P.L., eds., A workshop on "Evaluation of regional and urban
earthquake hazards and risk in Utah": U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report
84-763, p. 241-268.
#7824 Crone, A.J., Personius, S.F., DuRoss, C.B., Machette, M.N., and Mahan, S.A.,
2014, History of late Holocene earthquakes at the Willow Creek site and on the
9/19/23, 11:16 AM Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/cfusion/qfault/show_report_AB_archive.cfm?fault_id=2351&section_id=h 7/9
Nephi segment, Wasatch fault zone, Utah: Utah Geological Survey Special Study
151, 65 p., http://ugspub.nr.utah.gov/publications/special_studies/ss-151.pdf.
#6743 DuRoss, C.B., 2004, Spatial and temporal trends of surface rupturing on
the Nephi segment of the Wasatch fault, Utah—Implications for fault
segmentation and the recurrence of paleoearthquakes: Salt Lake City, University
of Utah, unpublished M.S. thesis, 120 p.
#8535 DuRoss, C.B., 2008, Holocene vertical displacement on the central
segments of the Wasatch fault zone, Utah: Bulletin of the Seismological Society
of America, v. 98, p. 2918–2933.
#6744 DuRoss, C.B., and Bruhn, R.L., 2005, Active tectonics of the Nephi segment,
Wasatch fault zone, Utah, in Lund, W.R., ed., Western States Seismic Policy
Council Proceedings Volume of the Basin and Range Province Seismic-Hazards
Summit II: Utah Geological Survey Miscellaneous Publication 05-2, 25 p., CD-
ROM.
#7823 DuRoss, C.B., Hylland. M.D., Hiscock, A., Personius, S.F., Briggs, R., Gold, R.,
Beukelman, G., McDonald, G.N., Erickson, B., McKean, A., Angster, S., King, R.,
Crone, A.J., and Mahan, S.A., 2017, Holocene surface-faulting earthquakes at the
Spring Lake and North Creek sites on the Nephi segment of the Wasatch fault
zone: evidence for complex rupture of the Nephi segment: Utah Geological
Survey Special Study 159, 44 p.,
https://ugspub.nr.utah.gov/publications/special_studies/ss-159/ss-159.pdf.
#7193 DuRoss, C.B., McDonald, G.N., and Lund, W.R., 2008, Paleoseismic
investigations of the northern strand of the Nephi segment of the Wasatch fault
zone at Santaquin, Utah: Utah Geological Survey Special Study 130, 37 p.,
http://ugspub.nr.utah.gov/publications/special_studies/ss-124.pdf.
#4987 Hanson, K.L., Swan, F.H., III, and Schwartz, D.P., 1981, Study of earthquake
recurrence intervals on the Wasatch fault, Utah: Sixth semi-annual technical
report prepared for the U.S. Geological Survey, Contract No. 14-08-011-16827, 22
p.
#4619 Harty, K.M., Mulvey, W.E., and Machette, M.N., 1997, Surficial geologic map
of the Nephi segment of the Wasatch fault zone, eastern Juab County, Utah: Utah
Geological Survey Map M-170, 14 p. pamphlet, scale 1:50,000.
#642 Hecker, S., 1993, Quaternary tectonics of Utah with emphasis on
earthquake-hazard characterization: Utah Geological Survey Bulletin 127, 157 p.,
9/19/23, 11:16 AM Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/cfusion/qfault/show_report_AB_archive.cfm?fault_id=2351&section_id=h 8/9
6 pls., scale 1:500,000.
#6745 Hylland, M.D., and Machette, M.N., 2004, Interim surficial geologic map of
the Levan segment of the Wasatch fault zone, Juab and Sanpete Counties, Utah,
in Christenson, G.E., Ashland, F.X., Hylland, M.D., McDonald, G.N., and Case, B.,
eds., Database compilation, coordination of earthquake-hazards mapping, and
study of the Wasatch fault and earthquake-induced landslides, Wasatch Front,
Utah: Technical Report to the U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia, under
Contract 03HQAG0008, variously paginated, scale 1:50,000.
#4621 Jackson, M.E., 1991, Paleoseismology of Utah, volume 3—The number and
timing of Holocene paleoseismic events on the Nephi and Levan segments,
Wasatch fault zone, Utah: Utah Geological Survey Special Studies 78, 23 p.,
http://ugspub.nr.utah.gov/publications/special_studies/SS-78.pdf.
#6733 Lund, W.R., 2005, Consensus preferred recurrence interval and vertical slip
rate estimates—Review of Utah paleoseismic-trenching data by the Utah
Quaternary Fault Parameters Working Group: Utah Geological Survey Bulletin
134, compact disk.
#4624 Lund, W.R., and Black, B.D., 1998, Paleoseismology of Utah, volume 8—
Paleoseismic investigation at Rock Canyon, Provo segment, Wasatch fault zone,
Utah County, Utah: Utah Geological Survey Special Study 93, 21 p.,
http://ugspub.nr.utah.gov/publications/special_studies/SS-93.pdf.
#4529 Machette, M.N., 1992, Surficial geologic map of the Wasatch fault zone,
eastern Utah Valley, Utah County and parts of Salt Lake and Juab Counties, Utah:
U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Map I-2095, scale 1:50,000.
#8536 Machette, M.N., Crone, A.J., Personius, S.F., Dart, R.L., Lidke, D.J., Mahan,
S.A., and Olig, S.S., 2008, Paleoseismology of the Nephi segment of the Wasatch
fault zone, Juab County, Utah—Preliminary results from two exploratory
trenches at Willow Creek: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map SI-
2966, 2 sheets, http://pubs.usgs.gov/sim/2007/2966.
#607 Machette, M.N., Personius, S.F., and Nelson, A.R., 1992, Paleoseismology of
the Wasatch fault zone—A summary of recent investigations, interpretations, and
conclusions, in Gori, P.L., and Hays, W.W., eds., Assessment of regional
earthquake hazards and risk along the Wasatch front, Utah: U.S. Geological
Survey Professional Paper 1500, p. A1-A71.
#189 Machette, M.N., Personius, S.F., Nelson, A.R., Schwartz, D.P., and Lund, W.R.,
9/19/23, 11:16 AM Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/cfusion/qfault/show_report_AB_archive.cfm?fault_id=2351&section_id=h 9/9
1991, The Wasatch fault zone, Utah—Segmentation and history of Holocene
earthquakes, in Hancock, P.L., Yeats, R.S., and Sanderson, D.J., eds.,
Characteristics of active faults: Journal of Structural Geology, v. 13, p. 137-150.
#6746 Mattson, A., and Bruhn, R.L., 2001, Fault slip rates and initiation age based
on diusion equation modeling—Wasatch fault zone and eastern Great Basin:
Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 106, no. B7, p. 13,739-13,750.
#4436 McCalpin, J.P., and Nishenko, S.P., 1996, Holocene paleoseismicity,
temporal clustering, and probabilities of future large (M> 7) earthquakes on the
Wasatch fault zone, Utah: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 101, no. B3, p.
6233-6253.
#6770 McCalpin, J.P., and Nishenko, S.P., 1996, Holocene probability, temporal
clustering, and probabilities of future large (M>7) earthquakes on the Wasatch
fault zone, Utah: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 101, no. B3, p. 6233-6253.
#347 Schwartz, D.P., and Coppersmith, K.J., 1984, Fault behavior and
characteristic earthquakes—Examples from the Wasatch and San Andreas fault
zones: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 89, no. B7, p. 5681–5698.
#558 Schwartz, D.P., Hanson, K., and Swan, F.H., III, 1983, Paleoseismic
investigations along the Wasatch fault zone—An update, in Crone, A.J., ed.,
Paleoseismicity along the Wasatch front and adjacent areas, central Utah: Utah
Geological and Mineral Survey Special Studies 62, p. 45-49.
#213 Zoback, M.L., 1983, Structure and Cenozoic tectonism along the Wasatch
fault zone, Utah, in Miller, D.M., Todd, V.R., and Howard, K.A., eds., Tectonic and
stratigraphic studies in the eastern Great Basin: Geological Society of America
Memoir 157, p. 3-27.

You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)

You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)

ATTACHMENT C4
DETERMINISTIC ANALYSES

ATTACHMENT C4.1
DETERMINISTIC EZ-FRISK SOFTWARE INPUT

File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 1 of 39
**********************************************
***** EZ-FRISK *****
***** SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS DEFINITION *****
***** FUGRO CONSULTANTS, INC. *****
***** WALNUT CREEK, CA USA *****
**********************************************
PROGRAM VERSION
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
ANALYSIS TITLE:
Shootaring Deterministic
ANALYSIS TYPE:
Single Site Analysis
SITE COORDINATES
Latitude 37.71
Longitude -110.7
INTENSITY TYPE: Spectral Response @ 5% Damping
HAZARD DEAGGREGATION
Status: ON
Deagregation Scenario 1
Period: PGA
Amplitude: 0.2 Acceleration (g)
Bin Configuration
Magnitude
Scale: Moment Magnitude
Lowest Value: 4 Mw
Highest Value: 9 Mw
Bin Size: 0.1
Distance
Lowest Value: 0 km
Highest Value: 300 km
Bin Size: 2.5 km
Epsilon
Lowest Value: -2.2
Highest Value: 4.2
Bin Size: 0.2
SOIL AMPLIFICATION
Method: Do not use soil amplification
ATTENUATION EQUATION SITE PARAMETERS
Depth[Vs=1000m/s] (m): 2
Estimate Z1 from Vs30 for CY NGA: 1
Regional Code: Default
Subduction Zone Setting: Unknown
Vs30 (m/s): 1000
Vs30 Is Measured: 0
Z25 (km): 0.43
AMPLITUDES - Acceleration (g)
0.0001
0.001
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 2 of 39
0.01
0.02
0.05
0.07
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.7
1
2
3
PERIODS (s)
PGA
0.05
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.75
1
2
3
4
DETERMINISTIC FRACTILES
0.5
0.84
PLOTTING PARAMETERS
Period at which to plot PGA: 0.0001
CALCULATIONAL PARAMETERS
Fault Seismic Sources -
Maximum inclusion distance : 1000 km
Down dip integration increment : 1 km
Horizontal integration increment : 1 km
Number rupture length per earthquake : 4
Subduction Interface Seismic Sources -
Maximum inclusion distance : 1000 km
Down dip integration increment : 5 km
Horizontal integration increment : 20 km
Number rupture length per earthquake : 1
Subduction Slab Seismic Sources -
Maximum inclusion distance : 1000 km
Down dip integration increment : 5 km
Horizontal integration increment : 20 km
Number rupture length per earthquake : 1
Area Seismic Sources -
Maximum inclusion distance : 1000 km
Vertical integration increment : 3 km
Number of rupture azimuths : 3
Minimum epicentral distance step : 0.5 km
Maximum epicentral distance step : 10 km
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 3 of 39
Gridded Seismic Sources -
Maximum inclusion distance : 400 km
Default number of rupture azimuths : 10
Maximum distance for default azimuths : 20 km
Minimum distance for one azimuth : 70
Use binned calcuations if possible : true
Bins per decade in distance (km) : 20
All Seismic Sources -
Magnitude integration step : 0.1 M
Apply magnitude scaling : NO
Include near-source directivity : NO
ATTENUATION EQUATIONS
Name: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Database: C:\Program Files (x86)\EZ-FRISK 8.07\Files\standard.bin-attendb
Base: Abrahamson-Silva 1997
Truncation Type: Trunc Sigma*Value
Truncation Value: 3
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Distance Type: Distance To Rupture
Name: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Database: C:\Program Files (x86)\EZ-FRISK 8.07\Files\standard.bin-attendb
Base: Abrahamson-et al 2014 NGA West 2
Truncation Type: USGS 2008 NSHM Truncation
Truncation Value: 3
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Distance Type: Distance To Rupture
Name: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Database: C:\Program Files (x86)\EZ-FRISK 8.07\Files\standard.bin-attendb
Base: Boore-et al 2014 NGA West 2
Truncation Type: USGS 2008 NSHM Truncation
Truncation Value: 3
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Distance Type: Horizontal Distance To Rupture
Name: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Database: C:\Program Files (x86)\EZ-FRISK 8.07\Files\standard.bin-attendb
Base: Campbell-Bozorgnia 2014 NGA West 2
Truncation Type: USGS 2008 NSHM Truncation
Truncation Value: 3
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Distance Type: Distance To Rupture
Name: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Database: C:\Program Files (x86)\EZ-FRISK 8.07\Files\standard.bin-attendb
Base: Chiou-Youngs 2014 NGA West 2
Truncation Type: USGS 2008 NSHM Truncation
Truncation Value: 3
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Distance Type: Distance To Rupture
Name: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
Database: C:\Program Files (x86)\EZ-FRISK 8.07\Files\standard.bin-attendb
Base: Spudich 1997/99
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 4 of 39
Truncation Type: Trunc Sigma*Value
Truncation Value: 3
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Distance Type: Horizontal Distance To Rupture
SEISMIC SOURCE SUMMARY TABLE
Closest
Deterministic Fault Dip Dips Site
Source Region Distance
Magnitude Mechanism Angle To Lies
Random Earthquake Utah Deterministic 14.75
6.3000 Normal 60.0000 NE SE
Aquarius and Awapa Plateaus Faults Utah Deterministic 102.25
7.2000 Normal 60.0000 W E
Beaver Basin Faults - Eastern Margin Faults Section Utah Deterministic 182.76
6.9000 Normal 60.0000 W E
Beaver Basin Faults - Intrabasin Faults Section Utah Deterministic 188.57
7.0000 Normal 60.0000 W E
Big Gypsum Valley Graben (Class B) Utah Deterministic 154.54
6.9000 Normal 60.0000 SW W
Bright Angel Fault Zone Utah Deterministic 191.94
7.3000 Normal 60.0000 NW NE
Central Kaibab Fault System Utah Deterministic 154.89
7.3000 Normal 60.0000 W NE
Clear Lake Fault Zone (Class B) Utah Deterministic 215.34
6.9000 Normal 60.0000 W SE
Cricket Mountains (West Side) Faults Utah Deterministic 241.50
7.0000 Normal 60.0000 NW SE
Eminence Fault Zone Utah Deterministic 153.36
6.9000 Normal 60.0000 NW NE
Fault 1, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B) Utah Deterministic 9.56
5.7000 Normal 60.0000 NW SW
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B) Utah Deterministic 11.47
6.2000 Normal 60.0000 SW SW
Fault 3, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B) Utah Deterministic 32.54
6.7000 Normal 60.0000 NW NW
Gunnison Fault Utah Deterministic 198.55
7.0000 Normal 60.0000 W SE
Hurricane Fault Zone - Anderson Junction Section Utah Deterministic 232.48
7.2000 Normal 60.0000 W E
Hurricane Fault Zone - Ash Creek Section Utah Deterministic 215.86
6.8000 Normal 60.0000 W E
Hurricane Fault Zone - Cedar City Section Utah Deterministic 207.20
7.0000 Normal 60.0000 NW E
Hurricane Fault Zone - Southern Section Utah Deterministic 280.97
7.3000 Normal 60.0000 NW NE
Joes Valley Fault Zone Utah Deterministic 137.62
7.4000 Normal 60.0000 W SE
Lisbon Valley Fault Zone (Class B) Utah Deterministic 127.00
6.9000 Normal 60.0000 SW SW
Main Street Fault Zone Utah Deterministic 265.35
7.4000 Normal 60.0000 W E
Markagunt Plateau Faults (Class B) Utah Deterministic 162.19
7.2000 Normal 60.0000 NW E
Mineral Mountains (West Side) Faults Utah Deterministic 203.88
6.9000 Normal 60.0000 W E
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 5 of 39
Moab Fault and Deformation Zones (Class B) Utah Deterministic 130.50
7.3000 Normal 60.0000 SW SW
Needles Fault Zone (Class B) Utah Deterministic 60.06
6.8000 Normal 60.0000 NW SW
Paradox Valley Graben (Class B) Utah Deterministic 157.97
7.2000 Normal 60.0000 SW SW
Paunsaugunt Utah Deterministic 113.75
7.0000 Normal 60.0000 W E
Price River Area Faults (Class B) Utah Deterministic 166.91
7.1000 Normal 60.0000 S S
Ryan Creek Fault Zone Utah Deterministic 174.57
7.0000 Normal 60.0000 S SW
Salt and Cache Valley Faults (Class B) Utah Deterministic 146.84
7.2000 Normal 60.0000 SW SW
Sevier Fault Utah Deterministic 139.45
7.0000 Normal 60.0000 W SE
Sevier Toroweap Fault Zone - Northern Toroweap Section Utah Deterministic 181.69
7.4000 Normal 60.0000 NW E
Sevier Toroweap Fault Zone - Sevier Section Utah Deterministic 144.50
7.4000 Normal 60.0000 W E
Sevier Valley Faults and Fold (Class B) Utah Deterministic 145.88
6.7000 Normal 60.0000 W E
Sevier Valley-Marysvale-Circleville Area Faults Utah Deterministic 150.42
6.9000 Normal 60.0000 W E
Shay Graben Fault (Class B) Utah Deterministic 87.97
7.0000 Normal 60.0000 NW W
Ten Mile Graben Faults (Class B) Utah Deterministic 131.22
6.9000 Normal 60.0000 S S
Thousand Lake Fault Utah Deterministic 90.85
7.1000 Normal 60.0000 W SE
Tushar Mountains (East Side) Fault Utah Deterministic 148.29
6.5000 Normal 60.0000 W SE
Unnamed Faults East of Atkinson Mesa Utah Deterministic 189.52
7.0000 Normal 60.0000 SW SW
Valley Mountains Monocline (Class B) Utah Deterministic 174.67
7.0000 Normal 60.0000 W SE
Wah Wah Mountains (South End near Lund) Fault Utah Deterministic 247.00
7.0000 Normal 60.0000 W E
Wasatch Fault Zone - Nephi Section Utah Deterministic 241.52
7.0000 Normal 60.0000 W SE
Wasatch Monocline (Class B) Utah Deterministic 165.70
7.5000 Normal 60.0000 W SE
West Kaibab Fault System Utah Deterministic 151.76
7.4000 Normal 60.0000 W NE
White Mountain Area Faults Utah Deterministic 158.58
6.4000 Normal 60.0000 W SE
SEISMIC SOURCES
Name: Random Earthquake
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 1.00000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 6.3
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 6 of 39
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.200000 6.400000 0.000000 6.300000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
37.8320 -110.7660
37.8330 -110.7670
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Aquarius and Awapa Plateaus Faults
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 1.00000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.2
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.900000 7.500000 0.000000 7.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 7 of 39
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.4780 -111.7240
38.0020 -111.8050
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Beaver Basin Faults - Eastern Margin Faults Section
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 1.00000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 6.9
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000 6.900000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.4800 -112.5900
38.1810 -112.6980
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 8 of 39
Name: Beaver Basin Faults - Intrabasin Faults Section
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 1.00000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000 7.000000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.5140 -112.7030
38.1670 -112.7720
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Big Gypsum Valley Graben (Class B)
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 1.00000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 6.9
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 9 of 39
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000 6.900000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.1680 -108.9710
38.0310 -108.6370
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Bright Angel Fault Zone
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 1.00000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.3
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 7.000000 7.600000 0.000000 7.300000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
36.3080 -111.9640
35.7820 -112.4660
Attenuation Equations for Source:
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 10 of 39
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Central Kaibab Fault System
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.50000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.3
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 7.000000 7.600000 0.000000 7.300000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
36.9250 -112.1480
36.2380 -112.1020
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Clear Lake Fault Zone (Class B)
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 11 of 39
Probability of Activity: 0.50000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 6.9
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000 6.900000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
39.2350 -112.6980
38.9180 -112.6310
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Cricket Mountains (West Side) Faults
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 1.00000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000 7.000000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 12 of 39
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
39.0540 -112.9580
38.6440 -113.1960
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Eminence Fault Zone
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 1.00000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 6.9
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000 6.900000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
36.5530 -111.6450
36.2890 -111.8870
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 13 of 39
*******************************************
Name: Fault 1, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.10000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 5.7
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 5.400000 6.000000 0.000000 5.700000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
37.7827 -110.5771
37.7528 -110.6020
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.50000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 6.2
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 14 of 39
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 5.900000 6.500000 0.000000 6.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
37.7715 -110.5709
37.6932 -110.5043
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Fault 3, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.10000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 6.7
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.400000 7.000000 0.000000 6.700000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
37.6653 -110.2595
37.4752 -110.3635
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 15 of 39
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Gunnison Fault
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 1.00000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000 7.000000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
39.6980 -111.7230
39.3180 -111.6950
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Hurricane Fault Zone - Anderson Junction Section
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 16 of 39
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 1.00000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.2
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 5.000e-001 6.900000 7.500000 0.000000 7.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
37.2970 -113.2850
36.9210 -113.3630
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Hurricane Fault Zone - Ash Creek Section
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 1.00000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 6.8
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.500000 7.100000 0.000000 6.800000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 17 of 39
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
37.5650 -113.1460
37.2970 -113.2830
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Hurricane Fault Zone - Cedar City Section
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 1.00000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000 7.000000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
37.6580 -113.0550
37.2950 -113.2820
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 18 of 39
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Hurricane Fault Zone - Southern Section
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.50000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.3
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 7.000000 7.600000 0.000000 7.300000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
36.1320 -113.1710
35.5470 -113.4760
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Joes Valley Fault Zone
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 1.00000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.4
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 19 of 39
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 7.100000 7.700000 0.000000 7.400000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
39.5990 -111.2210
38.8500 -111.3160
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Lisbon Valley Fault Zone (Class B)
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.50000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 6.9
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000 6.900000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 20 of 39
38.3120 -109.3690
38.0790 -109.0620
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Main Street Fault Zone
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 1.00000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.4
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 7.100000 7.700000 0.000000 7.400000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
36.8550 -113.5020
36.1360 -113.5470
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Markagunt Plateau Faults (Class B)
Region: Utah Deterministic
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 21 of 39
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 1.00000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.2
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.900000 7.500000 0.000000 7.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.0400 -112.5010
37.6500 -112.9200
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Mineral Mountains (West Side) Faults
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 1.00000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 6.9
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000 6.900000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 22 of 39
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.4830 -112.8650
38.1600 -112.9550
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Moab Fault and Deformation Zones (Class B)
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.50000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.3
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 7.000000 7.600000 0.000000 7.300000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.7960 -109.8820
38.4000 -109.2900
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 23 of 39
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Needles Fault Zone (Class B)
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.00000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 6.8
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.500000 7.100000 0.000000 6.800000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.1890 -109.8560
38.0350 -110.1530
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Paradox Valley Graben (Class B)
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 1.00000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.2
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 24 of 39
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.900000 7.500000 0.000000 7.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.4970 -109.0970
38.2040 -108.5900
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Paunsaugunt
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.50000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000 7.000000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 25 of 39
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.4460 -111.8720
38.0480 -111.9240
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Price River Area Faults (Class B)
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.50000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.1
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.800000 7.400000 0.000000 7.100000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
39.3080 -110.6980
39.2270 -110.1190
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 26 of 39
Name: Ryan Creek Fault Zone
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 1.00000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000 7.000000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.9280 -109.3050
38.7980 -108.8820
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Salt and Cache Valley Faults (Class B)
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.50000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.2
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 27 of 39
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.900000 7.500000 0.000000 7.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.9930 -109.9640
38.7090 -109.4000
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Sevier Fault
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.50000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000 7.000000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.6480 -112.1020
38.2760 -112.1210
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 28 of 39
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Sevier Toroweap Fault Zone - Northern Toroweap Section
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 1.00000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.4
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 7.100000 7.700000 0.000000 7.400000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
37.1800 -112.6480
36.5080 -112.9970
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Sevier Toroweap Fault Zone - Sevier Section
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 1.00000000
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 29 of 39
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.4
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 7.100000 7.700000 0.000000 7.400000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
37.9210 -112.3240
37.1700 -112.6630
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Sevier Valley Faults and Fold (Class B)
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 1.00000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 6.7
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.400000 7.000000 0.000000 6.700000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 30 of 39
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
37.8930 -112.3450
37.6900 -112.4260
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Sevier Valley-Marysvale-Circleville Area Faults
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 1.00000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 6.9
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000 6.900000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.4830 -112.2520
38.1700 -112.3140
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 31 of 39
*******************************************
Name: Shay Graben Fault (Class B)
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.10000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000 7.000000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.0420 -109.3080
37.8970 -109.7220
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Ten Mile Graben Faults (Class B)
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.50000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 6.9
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 32 of 39
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.600000 7.200000 0.000000 6.900000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.9080 -110.2360
38.8030 -109.8590
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Thousand Lake Fault
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 1.00000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.1
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.800000 7.400000 0.000000 7.100000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.5390 -111.5080
38.1080 -111.6050
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 33 of 39
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Tushar Mountains (East Side) Fault
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.50000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 6.5
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.200000 6.800000 0.000000 6.500000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.4430 -112.3010
38.2850 -112.2280
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Unnamed Faults East of Atkinson Mesa
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 34 of 39
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 1.00000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000 7.000000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.5310 -108.7200
38.3640 -108.2650
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Valley Mountains Monocline (Class B)
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.50000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000 7.000000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 35 of 39
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
39.3120 -111.9560
38.9640 -111.9080
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Wah Wah Mountains (South End near Lund) Fault
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 1.00000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000 7.000000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.3150 -113.4210
37.9530 -113.5110
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 36 of 39
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Wasatch Fault Zone - Nephi Section
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 1.00000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e+000 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000 7.000000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
40.0860 -111.7350
39.6990 -111.8220
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Wasatch Monocline (Class B)
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.50000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.5
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 37 of 39
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 7.200000 7.800000 0.000000 7.500000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
39.9190 -111.3770
39.0060 -111.6400
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: West Kaibab Fault System
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 1.00000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.4
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 7.100000 7.700000 0.000000 7.400000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
37.0020 -112.1690
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 38 of 39
36.2570 -112.2000
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: White Mountain Area Faults
Region: Utah Deterministic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 1.00000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 6.4
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Normal 1 Slip 2.000e-002 6.100000 6.700000 0.000000 6.400000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
39.1480 -111.4980
39.0010 -111.4750
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
MAGNITUDE CONVERSIONS
This analysis does not require any magnitude conversions.
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:13 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 39 of 39
Note: Your analysis may indirectly use magnitude conversions that are not listed here.
Echo File Creation Time: 12:58:13 Thursday, September 14, 2023
ATTACHMENT C4.2
DETERMINISTIC RESULTS

Attachment C4.2 Results of Deterministic Hazard Analysis
Mean Mean
+1SD Mean Mean
+1SD Mean Mean +1SD Mean Mean
+1SD Mean Mean
+1SD Mean Mean
+1SD Mean Mean
+1SD
Random Earthquake 15 6.3 0.11 0.20 0.10 0.19 0.10 0.18 0.13 0.23 0.09 0.16 0.20 0.33 0.12 0.20
Fault 1, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)2514 <1,600,000 <2.0 4 N 9 5.7 0.12 0.23 0.11 0.22 0.12 0.23 0.13 0.24 0.09 0.18 0.17 0.31 0.13 0.22
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)2514 <1,600,000 <2.0 10 N 13 6.2 0.18 0.32 0.14 0.28 0.20 0.37 0.18 0.33 0.14 0.25 0.23 0.39 0.23 0.37
Fault 3, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)2514 <1,600,000 <2.0 23 N 35 6.7 0.07 0.12 0.06 0.12 0.06 0.12 0.07 0.13 0.05 0.93 0.11 0.17 0.08 0.13
Needles fault zone (Class B)2507 <15,000 <2.0 32 N 60 6.8 0.04 0.06 0.03 0.07 0.03 0.06 0.04 0.07 0.03 0.05 0.06 0.09 0.04 0.07
Thousand Lake Fault 2506 <750,000 <2.0 49 N 91 7.1 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.05 0.02 0.04 0.03 0.05 0.02 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.03 0.05
Shay graben fault (Class B)2513 <1,600,000 <2.0 40 N 88 7.0 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.05 0.02 0.04 0.03 0.05 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.07 0.03 0.05
Aquarius and Awapa Plateaus faults 2505 <1,600,000 <2.0 55 N 89 7.2 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.04 0.00 0.07 0.03 0.05
Paunsaugunt fault 2504 <1,600,000 <2.0 44 N 114 7.0 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.02 0.04
Sevier/Toroweap fault zone, Sevier section 997a <130,000 <2.0 89 N 142 7.4 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.02 0.04
Sevier/Toroweap fault zone, northern Toroweap section 997b <130,000 <2.0 81 N 183 7.4 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.03
Moab fault and deformation zones (Class B)2476 <1,600,000 <2.0 68 N 137 7.3 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.02 0.04
West Kaibab fault system 994 <1,600,000 <2.0 83 N 153 7.4 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.02 0.03
Wasatch monocline (Class B)2450 <1,600,000 <2.0 104 165 7.5 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.02 0.03
Joes Valley fault zone 2453 <15,000 <2.0 84 N 137 7.4 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.02 0.04
Central Kaibab fault system 993 <1,600,000 <2.0 71 N 156 7.3 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.02 0.03
Salt and Cache Valleys faults (Class B)2474 <1,600,000 <2.0 58 N 148 7.2 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.02 0.03
Lisbon Valley fault zone (Class B)2511 <1,600,000 <2.0 37 N 142 6.9 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.03
Sevier fault 2355 <1,600,000 <2.0 42 N 140 7.0 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.03
Sevier Valley-Marysvale-Circleville area faults 2500 <750,000 <2.0 35 N 137 6.9 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.03
Ten Mile graben faults (Class B)2473 <1,600,000 <2.0 35 N 138 6.9 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.03
Markagunt Plateau Faults (Class B)2535 <750,000 <2.0 57 N 162 7.2 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.03
Paradox Valley graben (Class B)2286 <1,600,000 <2.0 56 N 162 7.2 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.03
Eminence fault zone 992 <1,600,000 <2.0 36 N 154 6.9 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.03
Price River area faults (Class B)2457 <1,600,000 <2.0 51 N 175 7.1 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.03
Bright Angel fault zone 991 <1,600,000 <2.0 74 N 192 7.3 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.03
Sevier Valley faults and fold (Class B)2537 <130,000 <2.0 24 N 145 6.7 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02
Big Gypsum Valley graben (Class B)2288 <1,600,000 <2.0 33 N 160 6.9 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.03
Valley Mountains monocline (Class B)2449 <1,600,000 <2.0 39 175 7.0 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02
Ryan Creek fault zone 2263 <1,600,000 <2.0 39 N 181 7.0 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02
Tushar Mountains (east side) fault 2501 <1,600,000 <2.0 19 N 149 6.5 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02
Beaver Basin faults, eastern margin faults 2492a <15,000 <2.0 34 N 176 6.9 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02
Beaver Basin faults, intrabasin faults 2492b <130,000 <2.0 39 N 184 7.0 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02
Unnamed faults east of Atkinson Mesa 2269 <1,600,000 <2.0 41 N 196 7.0 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02
Gunnison fault 2445 <15,000 <2.0 42 N 198 7.0 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02
White Mountain area faults 2451 <1,600,000 <2.0 16 N 158 6.4 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02
Main Street fault zone 1002 <130,000 <2.0 87 N 266 7.4 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02
Mineral Mountains (west side) faults 2489 <15,000 <2.0 38 N 204 6.9 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02
Clear Lake fault zone (Class B)2436 <15,000 <2.0 36 N 216 6.9 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02
Hurricane fault zone, cedar city section 998a <15,000 <2.0 45 N 208 7.0 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02
Hurricane fault zone, Ash creek section 998b <15,000 <2.0 32 N 217 6.8 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02
Hurricane fault zone, Anderson Junction section 998c <15,000 0.2-1 61 N 234 7.2 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02
Hurricane fault zone, southern section 998f <1,600,000 <2.0 71 N 282 7.3 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02
Wasatch fault zone, Nephi section 2351h <15,000 1-5 43 N 242 7.0 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02
Cricket Mountains (west side) faults 2460 <15,000 <2.0 41 N 239 7.0 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02
Wah Wah Mountains (south end near Lund) fault 2485 <130,000 <2.0 41 N 240 7.0 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02
1ya = years ago
2Wells and Coopersmith (1994)
Distance from
site to surface
trace of fault
(km)
MCE2
Lognormal Mean Arahamson-et al
(2014)Borre-Et al (2014)Campbell-Bozorgnia
(2014)
Name of Faults ID Number
Age of Most Recent
Prehistoric
Deformation
(ya)1
Slip-rate
(mm/yr)
Fault Length
(Km)
Fault
Type
Chiou-Youngs
(2014)
Abrahamson and
Silva
(1997)
Spudich et al.
(1999)
PGA
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 1 of 93
Deterministic Spectra Results using EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Largest Amplitudes of Ground Motions Considering All Sources Calculated using
Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Fractile: 0.5
Period Amplitude Magnitude Closest Region
Controlling Source
Distance(km)
PGA 1.798e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.05 2.841e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.1 3.908e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.2 4.050e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.3 3.206e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.4 2.542e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.5 2.052e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.75 1.358e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
1 9.480e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
2 3.585e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
3 2.053e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
4 1.346e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
Fractile: 0.84
Period Amplitude Magnitude Closest Region
Controlling Source
Distance(km)
PGA 3.229e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.05 5.355e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.1 7.614e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 2 of 93
0.2 7.645e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.3 6.041e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.4 4.830e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.5 3.955e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.75 2.688e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
1 1.903e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
2 7.371e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
3 4.243e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
4 2.771e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
Largest Amplitudes of Ground Motions Considering Sources Calculated with
Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Fractile: 0.5
Period Amplitude Magnitude Closest Region
Controlling Source
Distance(km)
PGA 1.436e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.05 1.870e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.1 2.893e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.2 2.949e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.3 2.115e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.4 1.568e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.5 1.248e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.75 7.708e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
1 5.428e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 3 of 93
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
2 2.337e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
3 1.385e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
4 8.504e-003 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
Fractile: 0.84
Period Amplitude Magnitude Closest Region
Controlling Source
Distance(km)
PGA 2.764e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.05 3.629e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.1 5.703e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.2 5.884e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.3 4.271e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.4 3.192e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.5 2.562e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.75 1.602e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
1 1.142e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
2 5.003e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
3 2.939e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
4 1.790e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
Largest Amplitudes of Ground Motions Considering Sources Calculated with Boore-
et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Fractile: 0.5
Period Amplitude Magnitude Closest Region
Controlling Source
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 4 of 93
Distance(km)
PGA 2.048e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.05 3.139e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.1 4.316e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.2 5.058e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.3 4.064e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.4 3.196e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.5 2.555e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.75 1.689e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
1 1.193e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
2 4.101e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
3 2.567e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
4 1.782e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
Fractile: 0.84
Period Amplitude Magnitude Closest Region
Controlling Source
Distance(km)
PGA 3.739e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.05 6.182e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.1 8.734e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.2 9.383e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.3 7.424e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.4 5.902e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.5 4.825e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.75 3.310e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 5 of 93
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
1 2.376e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
2 8.228e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
3 5.191e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
4 3.603e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
Largest Amplitudes of Ground Motions Considering Sources Calculated with
Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Fractile: 0.5
Period Amplitude Magnitude Closest Region
Controlling Source
Distance(km)
PGA 1.827e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.05 3.221e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.1 4.165e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.2 3.692e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.3 2.873e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.4 2.256e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.5 1.796e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.75 1.237e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
1 7.859e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
2 2.998e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
3 1.605e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
4 1.034e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
Fractile: 0.84
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 6 of 93
Period Amplitude Magnitude Closest Region
Controlling Source
Distance(km)
PGA 3.278e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.05 6.084e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.1 8.257e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.2 7.028e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.3 5.443e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.4 4.301e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.5 3.479e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.75 2.511e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
1 1.609e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
2 6.082e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
3 3.260e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
4 2.039e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
Largest Amplitudes of Ground Motions Considering Sources Calculated with Chiou-
Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Fractile: 0.5
Period Amplitude Magnitude Closest Region
Controlling Source
Distance(km)
PGA 1.376e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.05 2.275e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.1 3.337e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.2 3.200e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 7 of 93
0.3 2.480e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.4 1.958e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.5 1.595e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.75 1.024e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
1 7.026e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
2 2.450e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
3 1.177e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
4 6.620e-003 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
Fractile: 0.84
Period Amplitude Magnitude Closest Region
Controlling Source
Distance(km)
PGA 2.518e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.05 4.293e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.1 6.439e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.2 6.318e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.3 4.959e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.4 3.948e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.5 3.234e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.75 2.087e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
1 1.430e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
2 4.959e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
3 2.369e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
4 1.326e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 8 of 93
Largest Amplitudes of Ground Motions Considering Sources Calculated with Abra.-
Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Fractile: 0.5
Period Amplitude Magnitude Closest Region
Controlling Source
Distance(km)
PGA 2.309e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.05 3.371e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.1 4.523e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.2 5.081e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.3 4.173e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.4 3.382e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.5 2.744e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.75 1.842e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
1 1.373e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
2 5.619e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
3 2.756e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
4 1.584e-002 6.30 Mw 14.75 Utah Deterministic
Random Earthquake
Fractile: 0.84
Period Amplitude Magnitude Closest Region
Controlling Source
Distance(km)
PGA 3.943e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.05 5.813e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.1 8.036e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 9 of 93
0.2 9.302e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.3 7.716e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.4 6.314e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.5 5.206e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.75 3.559e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
1 2.722e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
2 1.154e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
3 5.830e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
4 3.378e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
Largest Amplitudes of Ground Motions Considering Sources Calculated with
Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Fractile: 0.5
Period Amplitude Magnitude Closest Region
Controlling Source
Distance(km)
PGA 2.296e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.05 4.029e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.1 5.133e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.2 5.622e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.3 4.817e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.4 4.088e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.5 3.389e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.75 2.295e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
1 1.658e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 10 of 93
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
2 6.457e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
3 4.305e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
4 3.229e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
Fractile: 0.84
Period Amplitude Magnitude Closest Region
Controlling Source
Distance(km)
PGA 3.748e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.05 7.356e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.1 9.836e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.2 9.920e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.3 8.500e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.4 7.296e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.5 6.146e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
0.75 4.298e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
1 3.192e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
2 1.362e-001 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
3 9.081e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
4 6.811e-002 6.20 Mw 11.48 Utah Deterministic
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
Largest Amplitudes of Ground Motions for Each Source
Source: Random Earthquake
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 14.75 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 11 of 93
Magnitude: 6.30 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.144e-001 9.833e-002 9.760e-002 1.283e-001
8.730e-002 1.985e-001 1.226e-001
0.05 1.782e-001 1.277e-001 1.449e-001 2.189e-001
1.418e-001 2.861e-001 2.290e-001
0.1 2.453e-001 1.966e-001 2.008e-001 2.825e-001
2.050e-001 3.833e-001 2.997e-001
0.2 2.575e-001 2.024e-001 2.396e-001 2.585e-001
2.006e-001 4.393e-001 3.333e-001
0.3 2.044e-001 1.472e-001 1.932e-001 2.013e-001
1.579e-001 3.694e-001 2.754e-001
0.4 1.629e-001 1.111e-001 1.517e-001 1.611e-001
1.265e-001 3.036e-001 2.249e-001
0.5 1.320e-001 8.982e-002 1.215e-001 1.295e-001
1.044e-001 2.491e-001 1.803e-001
0.75 8.763e-002 5.698e-002 8.031e-002 8.761e-002
6.987e-002 1.708e-001 1.159e-001
1 6.256e-002 4.084e-002 5.676e-002 6.025e-002
4.918e-002 1.294e-001 8.217e-002
2 2.584e-002 1.883e-002 2.108e-002 2.520e-002
1.904e-002 5.523e-002 3.483e-002
3 1.515e-002 1.192e-002 1.386e-002 1.445e-002
1.015e-002 2.749e-002 2.322e-002
4 1.009e-002 7.923e-003 1.012e-002 9.769e-003
6.002e-003 1.584e-002 1.742e-002
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 12 of 93
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 2.044e-001 1.886e-001 1.781e-001 2.302e-001
1.577e-001 3.344e-001 2.001e-001
0.05 3.325e-001 2.470e-001 2.853e-001 4.136e-001
2.640e-001 4.868e-001 4.181e-001
0.1 4.733e-001 3.863e-001 4.063e-001 5.604e-001
3.905e-001 6.720e-001 5.743e-001
0.2 4.842e-001 4.025e-001 4.445e-001 4.920e-001
3.911e-001 7.933e-001 5.881e-001
0.3 3.845e-001 2.963e-001 3.529e-001 3.814e-001
3.120e-001 6.739e-001 4.860e-001
0.4 3.091e-001 2.256e-001 2.802e-001 3.073e-001
2.520e-001 5.594e-001 4.014e-001
0.5 2.541e-001 1.838e-001 2.294e-001 2.510e-001
2.093e-001 4.666e-001 3.271e-001
0.75 1.732e-001 1.181e-001 1.574e-001 1.779e-001
1.410e-001 3.261e-001 2.171e-001
1 1.254e-001 8.571e-002 1.130e-001 1.233e-001
9.931e-002 2.535e-001 1.582e-001
2 5.297e-002 4.020e-002 4.229e-002 5.110e-002
3.839e-002 1.123e-001 7.347e-002
3 3.125e-002 2.524e-002 2.803e-002 2.936e-002
2.034e-002 5.760e-002 4.898e-002
4 2.071e-002 1.663e-002 2.046e-002 1.927e-002
1.198e-002 3.374e-002 3.674e-002
Source: Aquarius and Awapa Plateaus Faults
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 102.30 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 7.20 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 13 of 93
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 2.546e-002 2.433e-002 2.076e-002 2.453e-002
2.183e-002 4.301e-002 2.872e-002
0.05 3.449e-002 2.947e-002 2.601e-002 3.647e-002
3.137e-002 5.676e-002 4.153e-002
0.1 4.328e-002 3.978e-002 3.369e-002 3.995e-002
4.071e-002 7.586e-002 4.868e-002
0.2 5.116e-002 4.645e-002 4.280e-002 3.755e-002
4.047e-002 1.039e-001 7.315e-002
0.3 4.856e-002 4.293e-002 3.859e-002 3.782e-002
3.469e-002 1.082e-001 6.929e-002
0.4 4.341e-002 4.021e-002 3.247e-002 3.304e-002
2.967e-002 1.016e-001 6.168e-002
0.5 3.822e-002 3.693e-002 2.719e-002 2.886e-002
2.586e-002 9.234e-002 5.217e-002
0.75 2.896e-002 2.738e-002 1.903e-002 2.269e-002
1.928e-002 7.664e-002 3.621e-002
1 2.231e-002 2.057e-002 1.399e-002 1.557e-002
1.482e-002 6.652e-002 2.663e-002
2 1.190e-002 1.092e-002 6.859e-003 8.354e-003
7.614e-003 3.964e-002 1.190e-002
3 7.701e-003 7.852e-003 5.385e-003 5.424e-003
4.946e-003 2.186e-002 7.934e-003
4 5.505e-003 5.775e-003 4.638e-003 4.006e-003
3.358e-003 1.354e-002 5.950e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 14 of 93
PGA 4.447e-002 4.564e-002 3.789e-002 4.402e-002
3.839e-002 6.596e-002 4.689e-002
0.05 6.298e-002 5.573e-002 5.134e-002 6.904e-002
5.692e-002 8.791e-002 7.583e-002
0.1 8.154e-002 7.648e-002 6.911e-002 7.933e-002
7.561e-002 1.211e-001 9.328e-002
0.2 9.384e-002 9.043e-002 8.041e-002 7.147e-002
7.697e-002 1.708e-001 1.291e-001
0.3 8.893e-002 8.464e-002 7.050e-002 7.164e-002
6.688e-002 1.797e-001 1.223e-001
0.4 8.018e-002 7.995e-002 5.997e-002 6.300e-002
5.774e-002 1.704e-001 1.101e-001
0.5 7.166e-002 7.405e-002 5.135e-002 5.591e-002
5.067e-002 1.580e-001 9.462e-002
0.75 5.563e-002 5.561e-002 3.728e-002 4.606e-002
3.817e-002 1.343e-001 6.781e-002
1 4.344e-002 4.232e-002 2.786e-002 3.188e-002
2.946e-002 1.201e-001 5.125e-002
2 2.376e-002 2.286e-002 1.376e-002 1.694e-002
1.523e-002 7.490e-002 2.510e-002
3 1.556e-002 1.630e-002 1.089e-002 1.102e-002
9.835e-003 4.282e-002 1.674e-002
4 1.112e-002 1.188e-002 9.378e-003 7.903e-003
6.651e-003 2.706e-002 1.255e-002
Source: Beaver Basin Faults - Eastern Margin Faults Section
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 182.86 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 6.90 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 15 of 93
PGA 8.501e-003 6.723e-003 5.898e-003 6.956e-003
6.672e-003 1.918e-002 1.334e-002
0.05 1.085e-002 7.634e-003 6.524e-003 9.311e-003
8.432e-003 2.594e-002 1.877e-002
0.1 1.302e-002 9.132e-003 8.482e-003 9.467e-003
9.817e-003 3.467e-002 2.175e-002
0.2 1.731e-002 1.132e-002 1.304e-002 1.030e-002
1.024e-002 4.658e-002 3.675e-002
0.3 1.790e-002 1.232e-002 1.354e-002 1.196e-002
9.880e-003 4.985e-002 3.374e-002
0.4 1.692e-002 1.355e-002 1.230e-002 1.145e-002
9.259e-003 4.744e-002 2.863e-002
0.5 1.541e-002 1.348e-002 1.071e-002 1.080e-002
8.646e-003 4.358e-002 2.321e-002
0.75 1.217e-002 1.030e-002 7.968e-003 9.497e-003
7.162e-003 3.685e-002 1.497e-002
1 9.584e-003 7.640e-003 6.027e-003 6.851e-003
5.875e-003 3.242e-002 1.063e-002
2 5.316e-003 4.154e-003 2.965e-003 3.575e-003
3.438e-003 1.996e-002 4.939e-003
3 3.342e-003 2.962e-003 2.204e-003 2.214e-003
2.332e-003 1.070e-002 3.293e-003
4 2.321e-003 2.171e-003 1.817e-003 1.568e-003
1.565e-003 6.497e-003 2.470e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.479e-002 1.265e-002 1.128e-002 1.248e-002
1.173e-002 2.982e-002 2.177e-002
0.05 1.963e-002 1.448e-002 1.325e-002 1.763e-002
1.530e-002 4.072e-002 3.427e-002
0.1 2.430e-002 1.761e-002 1.797e-002 1.880e-002
1.824e-002 5.607e-002 4.168e-002
0.2 3.170e-002 2.210e-002 2.612e-002 1.960e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 16 of 93
1.947e-002 7.761e-002 6.485e-002
0.3 3.290e-002 2.437e-002 2.671e-002 2.265e-002
1.905e-002 8.390e-002 5.953e-002
0.4 3.141e-002 2.703e-002 2.431e-002 2.184e-002
1.802e-002 8.064e-002 5.109e-002
0.5 2.906e-002 2.711e-002 2.149e-002 2.093e-002
1.694e-002 7.553e-002 4.209e-002
0.75 2.352e-002 2.099e-002 1.647e-002 1.928e-002
1.418e-002 6.536e-002 2.804e-002
1 1.878e-002 1.576e-002 1.258e-002 1.402e-002
1.168e-002 5.922e-002 2.046e-002
2 1.068e-002 8.721e-003 6.263e-003 7.251e-003
6.878e-003 3.811e-002 1.042e-002
3 6.822e-003 6.165e-003 4.757e-003 4.498e-003
4.638e-003 2.116e-002 6.946e-003
4 4.737e-003 4.478e-003 3.858e-003 3.094e-003
3.099e-003 1.310e-002 5.210e-003
Source: Beaver Basin Faults - Intrabasin Faults Section
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 188.67 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 7.00 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 8.788e-003 7.014e-003 5.991e-003 7.077e-003
7.059e-003 2.000e-002 1.360e-002
0.05 1.110e-002 7.928e-003 6.537e-003 9.399e-003
8.846e-003 2.680e-002 1.880e-002
0.1 1.323e-002 9.401e-003 8.403e-003 9.362e-003
1.025e-002 3.582e-002 2.161e-002
0.2 1.766e-002 1.177e-002 1.295e-002 1.015e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 17 of 93
1.067e-002 4.880e-002 3.672e-002
0.3 1.850e-002 1.304e-002 1.361e-002 1.201e-002
1.035e-002 5.273e-002 3.423e-002
0.4 1.767e-002 1.456e-002 1.247e-002 1.161e-002
9.730e-003 5.050e-002 2.945e-002
0.5 1.622e-002 1.462e-002 1.093e-002 1.106e-002
9.116e-003 4.661e-002 2.413e-002
0.75 1.296e-002 1.132e-002 8.202e-003 9.849e-003
7.610e-003 3.978e-002 1.583e-002
1 1.027e-002 8.438e-003 6.241e-003 7.143e-003
6.280e-003 3.522e-002 1.133e-002
2 5.800e-003 4.644e-003 3.163e-003 3.815e-003
3.750e-003 2.201e-002 5.242e-003
3 3.686e-003 3.352e-003 2.395e-003 2.391e-003
2.587e-003 1.192e-002 3.495e-003
4 2.585e-003 2.496e-003 2.006e-003 1.706e-003
1.758e-003 7.291e-003 2.621e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.524e-002 1.316e-002 1.149e-002 1.270e-002
1.241e-002 3.067e-002 2.220e-002
0.05 2.001e-002 1.499e-002 1.329e-002 1.780e-002
1.605e-002 4.152e-002 3.432e-002
0.1 2.457e-002 1.807e-002 1.783e-002 1.860e-002
1.905e-002 5.717e-002 4.140e-002
0.2 3.221e-002 2.291e-002 2.602e-002 1.931e-002
2.030e-002 8.024e-002 6.478e-002
0.3 3.387e-002 2.571e-002 2.695e-002 2.275e-002
1.995e-002 8.756e-002 6.040e-002
0.4 3.268e-002 2.895e-002 2.474e-002 2.213e-002
1.893e-002 8.469e-002 5.256e-002
0.5 3.048e-002 2.932e-002 2.201e-002 2.143e-002
1.786e-002 7.975e-002 4.376e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 18 of 93
0.75 2.495e-002 2.300e-002 1.701e-002 1.999e-002
1.506e-002 6.969e-002 2.965e-002
1 2.005e-002 1.736e-002 1.307e-002 1.462e-002
1.249e-002 6.357e-002 2.181e-002
2 1.160e-002 9.723e-003 6.713e-003 7.739e-003
7.503e-003 4.160e-002 1.106e-002
3 7.504e-003 6.957e-003 5.200e-003 4.856e-003
5.144e-003 2.335e-002 7.372e-003
4 5.262e-003 5.136e-003 4.279e-003 3.367e-003
3.482e-003 1.457e-002 5.529e-003
Source: Big Gypsum Valley Graben (Class B)
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 154.62 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 6.90 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.117e-002 9.339e-003 8.372e-003 9.705e-003
9.004e-003 2.291e-002 1.598e-002
0.05 1.459e-002 1.085e-002 9.726e-003 1.345e-002
1.192e-002 3.098e-002 2.303e-002
0.1 1.781e-002 1.354e-002 1.275e-002 1.418e-002
1.439e-002 4.140e-002 2.696e-002
0.2 2.281e-002 1.635e-002 1.844e-002 1.482e-002
1.477e-002 5.535e-002 4.400e-002
0.3 2.284e-002 1.674e-002 1.813e-002 1.632e-002
1.367e-002 5.845e-002 4.021e-002
0.4 2.109e-002 1.735e-002 1.594e-002 1.510e-002
1.240e-002 5.519e-002 3.415e-002
0.5 1.891e-002 1.673e-002 1.362e-002 1.381e-002
1.129e-002 5.039e-002 2.775e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 19 of 93
0.75 1.462e-002 1.253e-002 9.860e-003 1.165e-002
8.995e-003 4.214e-002 1.800e-002
1 1.137e-002 9.296e-003 7.347e-003 8.228e-003
7.199e-003 3.678e-002 1.281e-002
2 6.155e-003 4.969e-003 3.513e-003 4.236e-003
3.989e-003 2.222e-002 5.917e-003
3 3.864e-003 3.515e-003 2.610e-003 2.631e-003
2.635e-003 1.191e-002 3.945e-003
4 2.684e-003 2.551e-003 2.151e-003 1.871e-003
1.754e-003 7.233e-003 2.959e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.949e-002 1.757e-002 1.576e-002 1.741e-002
1.583e-002 3.561e-002 2.609e-002
0.05 2.652e-002 2.058e-002 1.958e-002 2.547e-002
2.163e-002 4.863e-002 4.206e-002
0.1 3.342e-002 2.610e-002 2.676e-002 2.817e-002
2.674e-002 6.696e-002 5.166e-002
0.2 4.188e-002 3.193e-002 3.622e-002 2.821e-002
2.809e-002 9.223e-002 7.764e-002
0.3 4.199e-002 3.310e-002 3.493e-002 3.091e-002
2.635e-002 9.837e-002 7.096e-002
0.4 3.915e-002 3.459e-002 3.083e-002 2.880e-002
2.413e-002 9.381e-002 6.095e-002
0.5 3.564e-002 3.364e-002 2.683e-002 2.676e-002
2.213e-002 8.734e-002 5.033e-002
0.75 2.825e-002 2.553e-002 2.002e-002 2.364e-002
1.781e-002 7.475e-002 3.370e-002
1 2.226e-002 1.918e-002 1.506e-002 1.684e-002
1.431e-002 6.719e-002 2.466e-002
2 1.234e-002 1.043e-002 7.227e-003 8.593e-003
7.980e-003 4.243e-002 1.248e-002
3 7.857e-003 7.315e-003 5.449e-003 5.344e-003
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 20 of 93
5.240e-003 2.356e-002 8.321e-003
4 5.459e-003 5.264e-003 4.455e-003 3.691e-003
3.474e-003 1.458e-002 6.241e-003
Source: Bright Angel Fault Zone
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 192.05 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 7.30 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.103e-002 9.335e-003 7.429e-003 8.753e-003
9.529e-003 2.458e-002 1.565e-002
0.05 1.364e-002 1.052e-002 7.968e-003 1.154e-002
1.190e-002 3.221e-002 2.029e-002
0.1 1.602e-002 1.242e-002 9.939e-003 1.100e-002
1.385e-002 4.305e-002 2.269e-002
0.2 2.125e-002 1.578e-002 1.495e-002 1.156e-002
1.427e-002 6.070e-002 3.870e-002
0.3 2.279e-002 1.783e-002 1.585e-002 1.413e-002
1.376e-002 6.687e-002 3.791e-002
0.4 2.222e-002 2.021e-002 1.468e-002 1.378e-002
1.289e-002 6.492e-002 3.419e-002
0.5 2.074e-002 2.054e-002 1.299e-002 1.334e-002
1.206e-002 6.053e-002 2.905e-002
0.75 1.697e-002 1.634e-002 9.871e-003 1.210e-002
1.010e-002 5.268e-002 2.020e-002
1 1.363e-002 1.232e-002 7.588e-003 8.819e-003
8.377e-003 4.728e-002 1.484e-002
2 7.974e-003 6.951e-003 4.142e-003 5.017e-003
5.127e-003 3.054e-002 6.722e-003
3 5.222e-003 5.163e-003 3.316e-003 3.258e-003
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 21 of 93
3.639e-003 1.698e-002 4.481e-003
4 3.750e-003 3.928e-003 2.915e-003 2.385e-003
2.550e-003 1.058e-002 3.361e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.917e-002 1.751e-002 1.427e-002 1.571e-002
1.676e-002 3.770e-002 2.555e-002
0.05 2.461e-002 1.990e-002 1.622e-002 2.186e-002
2.159e-002 4.990e-002 3.705e-002
0.1 2.973e-002 2.387e-002 2.112e-002 2.185e-002
2.573e-002 6.870e-002 4.348e-002
0.2 3.880e-002 3.071e-002 3.011e-002 2.201e-002
2.715e-002 9.980e-002 6.829e-002
0.3 4.177e-002 3.515e-002 3.146e-002 2.677e-002
2.652e-002 1.110e-001 6.689e-002
0.4 4.114e-002 4.019e-002 2.920e-002 2.628e-002
2.508e-002 1.089e-001 6.103e-002
0.5 3.900e-002 4.119e-002 2.623e-002 2.584e-002
2.362e-002 1.036e-001 5.269e-002
0.75 3.266e-002 3.319e-002 2.051e-002 2.456e-002
2.000e-002 9.230e-002 3.783e-002
1 2.659e-002 2.535e-002 1.592e-002 1.805e-002
1.666e-002 8.535e-002 2.857e-002
2 1.595e-002 1.455e-002 8.814e-003 1.018e-002
1.026e-002 5.771e-002 1.418e-002
3 1.063e-002 1.072e-002 7.225e-003 6.618e-003
7.237e-003 3.326e-002 9.454e-003
4 7.636e-003 8.082e-003 6.232e-003 4.705e-003
5.049e-003 2.114e-002 7.090e-003
Source: Central Kaibab Fault System
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 22 of 93
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 154.97 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 7.30 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.545e-002 1.398e-002 1.138e-002 1.319e-002
1.368e-002 3.041e-002 1.959e-002
0.05 1.971e-002 1.624e-002 1.300e-002 1.820e-002
1.812e-002 3.984e-002 2.615e-002
0.1 2.368e-002 2.025e-002 1.641e-002 1.824e-002
2.207e-002 5.325e-002 2.962e-002
0.2 2.997e-002 2.489e-002 2.287e-002 1.824e-002
2.237e-002 7.460e-002 4.839e-002
0.3 3.076e-002 2.592e-002 2.263e-002 2.078e-002
2.051e-002 8.078e-002 4.713e-002
0.4 2.905e-002 2.719e-002 2.012e-002 1.938e-002
1.848e-002 7.764e-002 4.256e-002
0.5 2.655e-002 2.652e-002 1.740e-002 1.802e-002
1.678e-002 7.184e-002 3.626e-002
0.75 2.114e-002 2.056e-002 1.276e-002 1.548e-002
1.339e-002 6.163e-002 2.537e-002
1 1.672e-002 1.550e-002 9.629e-003 1.099e-002
1.076e-002 5.476e-002 1.870e-002
2 9.475e-003 8.553e-003 5.069e-003 6.149e-003
6.137e-003 3.453e-002 8.410e-003
3 6.194e-003 6.285e-003 4.057e-003 4.010e-003
4.214e-003 1.920e-002 5.606e-003
4 4.449e-003 4.721e-003 3.562e-003 2.954e-003
2.925e-003 1.196e-002 4.205e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 23 of 93
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 2.694e-002 2.622e-002 2.143e-002 2.366e-002
2.406e-002 4.663e-002 3.198e-002
0.05 3.579e-002 3.070e-002 2.617e-002 3.447e-002
3.288e-002 6.171e-002 4.775e-002
0.1 4.429e-002 3.893e-002 3.445e-002 3.623e-002
4.099e-002 8.498e-002 5.675e-002
0.2 5.494e-002 4.845e-002 4.497e-002 3.471e-002
4.256e-002 1.227e-001 8.538e-002
0.3 5.646e-002 5.111e-002 4.364e-002 3.935e-002
3.954e-002 1.341e-001 8.316e-002
0.4 5.380e-002 5.406e-002 3.896e-002 3.695e-002
3.596e-002 1.302e-001 7.595e-002
0.5 4.992e-002 5.319e-002 3.429e-002 3.491e-002
3.287e-002 1.229e-001 6.576e-002
0.75 4.067e-002 4.175e-002 2.593e-002 3.142e-002
2.650e-002 1.080e-001 4.751e-002
1 3.259e-002 3.190e-002 1.975e-002 2.249e-002
2.139e-002 9.885e-002 3.600e-002
2 1.892e-002 1.791e-002 1.044e-002 1.247e-002
1.228e-002 6.524e-002 1.774e-002
3 1.255e-002 1.305e-002 8.480e-003 8.146e-003
8.379e-003 3.760e-002 1.183e-002
4 9.021e-003 9.715e-003 7.387e-003 5.828e-003
5.793e-003 2.390e-002 8.870e-003
Source: Clear Lake Fault Zone (Class B)
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 215.46 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 6.90 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 24 of 93
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 6.424e-003 4.702e-003 4.057e-003 4.885e-003
4.805e-003 1.612e-002 1.122e-002
0.05 8.025e-003 5.202e-003 4.247e-003 6.296e-003
5.754e-003 2.180e-002 1.545e-002
0.1 9.479e-003 5.925e-003 5.466e-003 6.147e-003
6.426e-003 2.914e-002 1.773e-002
0.2 1.311e-002 7.562e-003 9.021e-003 6.996e-003
6.828e-003 3.934e-002 3.096e-002
0.3 1.399e-002 8.848e-003 9.978e-003 8.609e-003
6.918e-003 4.266e-002 2.855e-002
0.4 1.354e-002 1.042e-002 9.415e-003 8.581e-003
6.733e-003 4.091e-002 2.420e-002
0.5 1.253e-002 1.074e-002 8.375e-003 8.379e-003
6.472e-003 3.781e-002 1.958e-002
0.75 1.012e-002 8.399e-003 6.442e-003 7.716e-003
5.609e-003 3.232e-002 1.257e-002
1 8.082e-003 6.229e-003 4.960e-003 5.710e-003
4.733e-003 2.865e-002 8.901e-003
2 4.603e-003 3.454e-003 2.523e-003 3.028e-003
2.945e-003 1.797e-002 4.159e-003
3 2.899e-003 2.487e-003 1.876e-003 1.870e-003
2.057e-003 9.634e-003 2.773e-003
4 2.013e-003 1.844e-003 1.547e-003 1.319e-003
1.392e-003 5.850e-003 2.080e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 25 of 93
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.113e-002 8.846e-003 7.881e-003 8.767e-003
8.450e-003 2.506e-002 1.832e-002
0.05 1.443e-002 9.868e-003 8.693e-003 1.192e-002
1.044e-002 3.422e-002 2.821e-002
0.1 1.756e-002 1.143e-002 1.169e-002 1.221e-002
1.194e-002 4.712e-002 3.397e-002
0.2 2.391e-002 1.476e-002 1.840e-002 1.332e-002
1.299e-002 6.555e-002 5.463e-002
0.3 2.567e-002 1.749e-002 2.012e-002 1.631e-002
1.334e-002 7.180e-002 5.037e-002
0.4 2.512e-002 2.078e-002 1.899e-002 1.636e-002
1.310e-002 6.954e-002 4.319e-002
0.5 2.363e-002 2.160e-002 1.712e-002 1.624e-002
1.268e-002 6.553e-002 3.551e-002
0.75 1.957e-002 1.711e-002 1.355e-002 1.566e-002
1.110e-002 5.733e-002 2.354e-002
1 1.584e-002 1.285e-002 1.054e-002 1.169e-002
9.410e-003 5.233e-002 1.713e-002
2 9.259e-003 7.250e-003 5.466e-003 6.141e-003
5.893e-003 3.431e-002 8.774e-003
3 5.923e-003 5.176e-003 4.100e-003 3.799e-003
4.092e-003 1.905e-002 5.849e-003
4 4.116e-003 3.805e-003 3.326e-003 2.603e-003
2.756e-003 1.179e-002 4.387e-003
Source: Cricket Mountains (West Side) Faults
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 241.62 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 7.00 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 26 of 93
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 5.719e-003 4.008e-003 3.321e-003 4.094e-003
4.200e-003 1.545e-002 1.049e-002
0.05 6.991e-003 4.343e-003 3.312e-003 5.117e-003
4.824e-003 2.071e-002 1.401e-002
0.1 8.144e-003 4.756e-003 4.185e-003 4.773e-003
5.231e-003 2.768e-002 1.587e-002
0.2 1.156e-002 6.243e-003 7.241e-003 5.563e-003
5.606e-003 3.799e-002 2.835e-002
0.3 1.271e-002 7.774e-003 8.438e-003 7.218e-003
5.873e-003 4.186e-002 2.661e-002
0.4 1.259e-002 9.702e-003 8.233e-003 7.438e-003
5.869e-003 4.056e-002 2.286e-002
0.5 1.186e-002 1.033e-002 7.475e-003 7.498e-003
5.760e-003 3.778e-002 1.867e-002
0.75 9.812e-003 8.300e-003 5.926e-003 7.191e-003
5.173e-003 3.277e-002 1.216e-002
1 7.949e-003 6.184e-003 4.644e-003 5.438e-003
4.470e-003 2.935e-002 8.668e-003
2 4.678e-003 3.514e-003 2.486e-003 2.982e-003
2.951e-003 1.887e-002 4.045e-003
3 2.983e-003 2.578e-003 1.883e-003 1.860e-003
2.135e-003 1.022e-002 2.697e-003
4 2.092e-003 1.958e-003 1.578e-003 1.319e-003
1.471e-003 6.250e-003 2.022e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 9.836e-003 7.518e-003 6.521e-003 7.346e-003
7.387e-003 2.370e-002 1.712e-002
0.05 1.246e-002 8.213e-003 6.818e-003 9.691e-003
8.753e-003 3.208e-002 2.558e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 27 of 93
0.1 1.493e-002 9.144e-003 9.008e-003 9.480e-003
9.718e-003 4.417e-002 3.041e-002
0.2 2.092e-002 1.215e-002 1.496e-002 1.059e-002
1.066e-002 6.246e-002 5.002e-002
0.3 2.317e-002 1.533e-002 1.728e-002 1.367e-002
1.132e-002 6.952e-002 4.695e-002
0.4 2.323e-002 1.929e-002 1.685e-002 1.418e-002
1.142e-002 6.803e-002 4.080e-002
0.5 2.225e-002 2.071e-002 1.548e-002 1.453e-002
1.129e-002 6.464e-002 3.386e-002
0.75 1.888e-002 1.686e-002 1.261e-002 1.460e-002
1.024e-002 5.742e-002 2.278e-002
1 1.551e-002 1.272e-002 9.987e-003 1.113e-002
8.887e-003 5.299e-002 1.668e-002
2 9.376e-003 7.356e-003 5.476e-003 6.047e-003
5.904e-003 3.566e-002 8.533e-003
3 6.068e-003 5.351e-003 4.115e-003 3.779e-003
4.245e-003 2.002e-002 5.689e-003
4 4.263e-003 4.028e-003 3.392e-003 2.603e-003
2.912e-003 1.249e-002 4.266e-003
Source: Eminence Fault Zone
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 153.44 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 6.90 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.129e-002 9.473e-003 8.444e-003 9.855e-003
9.102e-003 2.310e-002 1.606e-002
0.05 1.476e-002 1.101e-002 9.821e-003 1.368e-002
1.207e-002 3.123e-002 2.316e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 28 of 93
0.1 1.802e-002 1.377e-002 1.288e-002 1.445e-002
1.460e-002 4.174e-002 2.711e-002
0.2 2.305e-002 1.662e-002 1.859e-002 1.507e-002
1.497e-002 5.579e-002 4.421e-002
0.3 2.305e-002 1.696e-002 1.826e-002 1.656e-002
1.383e-002 5.888e-002 4.040e-002
0.4 2.127e-002 1.754e-002 1.604e-002 1.530e-002
1.253e-002 5.557e-002 3.431e-002
0.5 1.906e-002 1.689e-002 1.370e-002 1.397e-002
1.141e-002 5.073e-002 2.788e-002
0.75 1.473e-002 1.264e-002 9.913e-003 1.177e-002
9.071e-003 4.240e-002 1.808e-002
1 1.145e-002 9.377e-003 7.384e-003 8.302e-003
7.253e-003 3.700e-002 1.287e-002
2 6.192e-003 5.009e-003 3.528e-003 4.272e-003
4.012e-003 2.233e-002 5.945e-003
3 3.886e-003 3.542e-003 2.622e-003 2.652e-003
2.649e-003 1.197e-002 3.963e-003
4 2.700e-003 2.570e-003 2.160e-003 1.886e-003
1.763e-003 7.268e-003 2.972e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.969e-002 1.782e-002 1.589e-002 1.769e-002
1.601e-002 3.590e-002 2.621e-002
0.05 2.683e-002 2.089e-002 1.977e-002 2.591e-002
2.191e-002 4.903e-002 4.228e-002
0.1 3.382e-002 2.655e-002 2.702e-002 2.870e-002
2.712e-002 6.751e-002 5.195e-002
0.2 4.232e-002 3.245e-002 3.651e-002 2.869e-002
2.848e-002 9.296e-002 7.800e-002
0.3 4.238e-002 3.354e-002 3.516e-002 3.136e-002
2.667e-002 9.909e-002 7.128e-002
0.4 3.948e-002 3.497e-002 3.101e-002 2.917e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 29 of 93
2.439e-002 9.446e-002 6.123e-002
0.5 3.592e-002 3.397e-002 2.698e-002 2.708e-002
2.235e-002 8.792e-002 5.056e-002
0.75 2.845e-002 2.575e-002 2.012e-002 2.388e-002
1.796e-002 7.521e-002 3.386e-002
1 2.241e-002 1.935e-002 1.513e-002 1.700e-002
1.442e-002 6.757e-002 2.478e-002
2 1.241e-002 1.052e-002 7.254e-003 8.664e-003
8.026e-003 4.264e-002 1.254e-002
3 7.902e-003 7.371e-003 5.468e-003 5.388e-003
5.268e-003 2.367e-002 8.360e-003
4 5.490e-003 5.302e-003 4.472e-003 3.721e-003
3.492e-003 1.466e-002 6.270e-003
Source: Fault 1, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 9.57 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 5.70 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.217e-001 1.072e-001 1.242e-001 1.336e-001
9.137e-002 1.722e-001 1.321e-001
0.05 1.892e-001 1.398e-001 1.897e-001 2.212e-001
1.497e-001 2.699e-001 2.213e-001
0.1 2.644e-001 2.168e-001 2.694e-001 2.978e-001
2.184e-001 3.627e-001 2.763e-001
0.2 2.563e-001 2.124e-001 2.421e-001 2.750e-001
2.143e-001 3.672e-001 3.082e-001
0.3 1.920e-001 1.460e-001 1.548e-001 2.244e-001
1.684e-001 2.829e-001 2.504e-001
0.4 1.449e-001 1.055e-001 1.126e-001 1.634e-001
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 30 of 93
1.328e-001 2.195e-001 2.010e-001
0.5 1.137e-001 8.209e-002 8.722e-002 1.269e-001
1.066e-001 1.725e-001 1.589e-001
0.75 7.053e-002 4.724e-002 5.174e-002 8.470e-002
6.497e-002 1.087e-001 9.927e-002
1 4.689e-002 3.224e-002 3.336e-002 5.366e-002
4.211e-002 7.739e-002 6.878e-002
2 1.604e-002 1.337e-002 9.879e-003 1.645e-002
1.272e-002 2.829e-002 2.732e-002
3 8.544e-003 7.533e-003 5.735e-003 8.002e-003
5.958e-003 1.277e-002 1.821e-002
4 5.378e-003 4.560e-003 3.920e-003 4.886e-003
3.261e-003 6.866e-003 1.366e-002
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 2.252e-001 2.156e-001 2.267e-001 2.397e-001
1.789e-001 3.143e-001 2.157e-001
0.05 3.659e-001 2.850e-001 3.737e-001 4.180e-001
3.018e-001 4.977e-001 4.040e-001
0.1 5.286e-001 4.482e-001 5.452e-001 5.907e-001
4.498e-001 6.892e-001 5.295e-001
0.2 4.994e-001 4.424e-001 4.491e-001 5.234e-001
4.508e-001 7.188e-001 5.437e-001
0.3 3.743e-001 3.054e-001 2.828e-001 4.251e-001
3.578e-001 5.594e-001 4.417e-001
0.4 2.847e-001 2.212e-001 2.080e-001 3.116e-001
2.842e-001 4.384e-001 3.587e-001
0.5 2.262e-001 1.728e-001 1.647e-001 2.459e-001
2.291e-001 3.491e-001 2.882e-001
0.75 1.434e-001 9.992e-002 1.014e-001 1.719e-001
1.391e-001 2.232e-001 1.859e-001
1 9.633e-002 6.872e-002 6.640e-002 1.098e-001
8.913e-002 1.627e-001 1.324e-001
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 31 of 93
2 3.352e-002 2.870e-002 1.982e-002 3.337e-002
2.626e-002 6.123e-002 5.763e-002
3 1.790e-002 1.605e-002 1.160e-002 1.626e-002
1.223e-002 2.835e-002 3.842e-002
4 1.120e-002 9.623e-003 7.926e-003 9.640e-003
6.670e-003 1.545e-002 2.882e-002
Source: Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 11.48 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 6.20 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.798e-001 1.436e-001 2.048e-001 1.827e-001
1.376e-001 2.309e-001 2.296e-001
0.05 2.841e-001 1.870e-001 3.139e-001 3.221e-001
2.275e-001 3.371e-001 4.029e-001
0.1 3.908e-001 2.893e-001 4.316e-001 4.165e-001
3.337e-001 4.523e-001 5.133e-001
0.2 4.050e-001 2.949e-001 5.058e-001 3.692e-001
3.200e-001 5.081e-001 5.622e-001
0.3 3.206e-001 2.115e-001 4.064e-001 2.873e-001
2.480e-001 4.173e-001 4.817e-001
0.4 2.542e-001 1.568e-001 3.196e-001 2.256e-001
1.958e-001 3.382e-001 4.088e-001
0.5 2.052e-001 1.248e-001 2.555e-001 1.796e-001
1.595e-001 2.744e-001 3.389e-001
0.75 1.358e-001 7.708e-002 1.689e-001 1.237e-001
1.024e-001 1.842e-001 2.295e-001
1 9.480e-002 5.428e-002 1.193e-001 7.859e-002
7.026e-002 1.373e-001 1.658e-001
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 32 of 93
2 3.585e-002 2.337e-002 4.101e-002 2.998e-002
2.450e-002 5.619e-002 6.457e-002
3 2.053e-002 1.385e-002 2.567e-002 1.605e-002
1.177e-002 2.756e-002 4.305e-002
4 1.346e-002 8.504e-003 1.782e-002 1.034e-002
6.620e-003 1.571e-002 3.229e-002
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 3.229e-001 2.764e-001 3.739e-001 3.278e-001
2.518e-001 3.943e-001 3.748e-001
0.05 5.355e-001 3.629e-001 6.182e-001 6.084e-001
4.293e-001 5.813e-001 7.356e-001
0.1 7.614e-001 5.703e-001 8.734e-001 8.257e-001
6.439e-001 8.036e-001 9.836e-001
0.2 7.645e-001 5.884e-001 9.383e-001 7.028e-001
6.318e-001 9.302e-001 9.920e-001
0.3 6.041e-001 4.271e-001 7.424e-001 5.443e-001
4.959e-001 7.716e-001 8.500e-001
0.4 4.830e-001 3.192e-001 5.902e-001 4.301e-001
3.948e-001 6.314e-001 7.296e-001
0.5 3.955e-001 2.562e-001 4.825e-001 3.479e-001
3.234e-001 5.206e-001 6.146e-001
0.75 2.688e-001 1.602e-001 3.310e-001 2.511e-001
2.087e-001 3.559e-001 4.298e-001
1 1.903e-001 1.142e-001 2.376e-001 1.609e-001
1.430e-001 2.722e-001 3.192e-001
2 7.371e-002 5.003e-002 8.228e-002 6.082e-002
4.959e-002 1.154e-001 1.362e-001
3 4.243e-002 2.939e-002 5.191e-002 3.260e-002
2.369e-002 5.830e-002 9.081e-002
4 2.771e-002 1.790e-002 3.603e-002 2.039e-002
1.326e-002 3.378e-002 6.811e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 33 of 93
Source: Fault 3, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 32.56 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 6.70 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 6.922e-002 6.262e-002 6.386e-002 7.218e-002
5.316e-002 1.076e-001 8.100e-002
0.05 1.047e-001 8.020e-002 9.168e-002 1.196e-001
8.483e-002 1.483e-001 1.462e-001
0.1 1.413e-001 1.202e-001 1.248e-001 1.479e-001
1.202e-001 1.982e-001 1.884e-001
0.2 1.531e-001 1.288e-001 1.476e-001 1.367e-001
1.169e-001 2.464e-001 2.251e-001
0.3 1.270e-001 9.974e-002 1.204e-001 1.123e-001
9.255e-002 2.268e-001 1.933e-001
0.4 1.045e-001 7.945e-002 9.555e-002 9.359e-002
7.443e-002 1.972e-001 1.621e-001
0.5 8.666e-002 6.654e-002 7.719e-002 7.720e-002
6.177e-002 1.689e-001 1.323e-001
0.75 5.991e-002 4.485e-002 5.154e-002 5.457e-002
4.204e-002 1.257e-001 8.743e-002
1 4.390e-002 3.292e-002 3.683e-002 3.751e-002
3.029e-002 1.010e-001 6.296e-002
2 2.018e-002 1.605e-002 1.525e-002 1.799e-002
1.290e-002 4.988e-002 2.755e-002
3 1.242e-002 1.065e-002 1.088e-002 1.099e-002
7.333e-003 2.615e-002 1.837e-002
4 8.587e-003 7.277e-003 8.543e-003 7.832e-003
4.579e-003 1.563e-002 1.378e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 34 of 93
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.220e-001 1.186e-001 1.166e-001 1.295e-001
9.348e-002 1.718e-001 1.322e-001
0.05 1.933e-001 1.531e-001 1.806e-001 2.262e-001
1.539e-001 2.391e-001 2.668e-001
0.1 2.695e-001 2.332e-001 2.525e-001 2.935e-001
2.231e-001 3.294e-001 3.611e-001
0.2 2.837e-001 2.530e-001 2.737e-001 2.602e-001
2.223e-001 4.218e-001 3.971e-001
0.3 2.352e-001 1.984e-001 2.200e-001 2.126e-001
1.784e-001 3.921e-001 3.410e-001
0.4 1.952e-001 1.594e-001 1.765e-001 1.785e-001
1.448e-001 3.443e-001 2.893e-001
0.5 1.642e-001 1.346e-001 1.458e-001 1.496e-001
1.210e-001 3.005e-001 2.399e-001
0.75 1.166e-001 9.186e-002 1.010e-001 1.108e-001
8.321e-002 2.285e-001 1.637e-001
1 8.672e-002 6.830e-002 7.331e-002 7.677e-002
6.022e-002 1.888e-001 1.212e-001
2 4.089e-002 3.387e-002 3.060e-002 3.648e-002
2.581e-002 9.725e-002 5.813e-002
3 2.539e-002 2.228e-002 2.199e-002 2.234e-002
1.458e-002 5.272e-002 3.875e-002
4 1.750e-002 1.510e-002 1.727e-002 1.545e-002
9.069e-003 3.210e-002 2.906e-002
Source: Gunnison Fault
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 198.65 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 7.00 Mw
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 35 of 93
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 8.058e-003 6.290e-003 5.343e-003 6.351e-003
6.389e-003 1.895e-002 1.289e-002
0.05 1.011e-002 7.053e-003 5.733e-003 8.336e-003
7.877e-003 2.540e-002 1.768e-002
0.1 1.198e-002 8.239e-003 7.345e-003 8.199e-003
9.016e-003 3.395e-002 2.026e-002
0.2 1.619e-002 1.040e-002 1.156e-002 9.009e-003
9.436e-003 4.632e-002 3.479e-002
0.3 1.714e-002 1.179e-002 1.239e-002 1.086e-002
9.280e-003 5.025e-002 3.248e-002
0.4 1.649e-002 1.344e-002 1.149e-002 1.062e-002
8.828e-003 4.824e-002 2.794e-002
0.5 1.522e-002 1.365e-002 1.013e-002 1.023e-002
8.343e-003 4.462e-002 2.287e-002
0.75 1.224e-002 1.064e-002 7.680e-003 9.240e-003
7.061e-003 3.820e-002 1.499e-002
1 9.749e-003 7.930e-003 5.876e-003 6.753e-003
5.877e-003 3.390e-002 1.071e-002
2 5.548e-003 4.391e-003 3.008e-003 3.624e-003
3.577e-003 2.132e-002 4.966e-003
3 3.528e-003 3.179e-003 2.278e-003 2.269e-003
2.489e-003 1.155e-002 3.311e-003
4 2.474e-003 2.375e-003 1.909e-003 1.617e-003
1.696e-003 7.061e-003 2.483e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 36 of 93
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.396e-002 1.180e-002 1.030e-002 1.140e-002
1.124e-002 2.906e-002 2.103e-002
0.05 1.818e-002 1.334e-002 1.169e-002 1.579e-002
1.429e-002 3.935e-002 3.228e-002
0.1 2.220e-002 1.584e-002 1.564e-002 1.629e-002
1.675e-002 5.418e-002 3.883e-002
0.2 2.950e-002 2.026e-002 2.338e-002 1.715e-002
1.795e-002 7.616e-002 6.139e-002
0.3 3.136e-002 2.324e-002 2.471e-002 2.057e-002
1.789e-002 8.345e-002 5.731e-002
0.4 3.050e-002 2.672e-002 2.294e-002 2.025e-002
1.718e-002 8.091e-002 4.986e-002
0.5 2.859e-002 2.737e-002 2.052e-002 1.982e-002
1.635e-002 7.633e-002 4.148e-002
0.75 2.357e-002 2.162e-002 1.601e-002 1.876e-002
1.398e-002 6.694e-002 2.807e-002
1 1.902e-002 1.632e-002 1.238e-002 1.382e-002
1.169e-002 6.121e-002 2.062e-002
2 1.110e-002 9.192e-003 6.435e-003 7.351e-003
7.156e-003 4.029e-002 1.048e-002
3 7.187e-003 6.597e-003 4.978e-003 4.609e-003
4.950e-003 2.261e-002 6.984e-003
4 5.042e-003 4.887e-003 4.101e-003 3.191e-003
3.359e-003 1.411e-002 5.238e-003
Source: Hurricane Fault Zone - Anderson Junction Section
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 232.60 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 7.20 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 37 of 93
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 7.293e-003 5.512e-003 4.366e-003 5.333e-003
5.787e-003 1.880e-002 1.213e-002
0.05 8.826e-003 6.015e-003 4.386e-003 6.718e-003
6.763e-003 2.481e-002 1.568e-002
0.1 1.022e-002 6.677e-003 5.450e-003 6.162e-003
7.467e-003 3.316e-002 1.752e-002
0.2 1.428e-002 8.767e-003 9.044e-003 6.921e-003
7.878e-003 4.653e-002 3.105e-002
0.3 1.583e-002 1.079e-002 1.036e-002 9.005e-003
8.066e-003 5.176e-002 3.005e-002
0.4 1.581e-002 1.329e-002 1.005e-002 9.206e-003
7.921e-003 5.050e-002 2.663e-002
0.5 1.499e-002 1.409e-002 9.112e-003 9.266e-003
7.679e-003 4.728e-002 2.228e-002
0.75 1.251e-002 1.144e-002 7.194e-003 8.856e-003
6.802e-003 4.144e-002 1.510e-002
1 1.018e-002 8.596e-003 5.638e-003 6.656e-003
5.839e-003 3.738e-002 1.096e-002
2 6.087e-003 4.934e-003 3.134e-003 3.783e-003
3.844e-003 2.444e-002 5.037e-003
3 3.958e-003 3.680e-003 2.463e-003 2.419e-003
2.811e-003 1.348e-002 3.358e-003
4 2.822e-003 2.824e-003 2.132e-003 1.746e-003
1.973e-003 8.350e-003 2.518e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.259e-002 1.034e-002 8.542e-003 9.571e-003
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 38 of 93
1.018e-002 2.883e-002 1.980e-002
0.05 1.578e-002 1.137e-002 9.013e-003 1.272e-002
1.227e-002 3.843e-002 2.864e-002
0.1 1.878e-002 1.284e-002 1.170e-002 1.224e-002
1.387e-002 5.291e-002 3.357e-002
0.2 2.590e-002 1.707e-002 1.861e-002 1.317e-002
1.499e-002 7.650e-002 5.479e-002
0.3 2.890e-002 2.128e-002 2.112e-002 1.706e-002
1.555e-002 8.595e-002 5.302e-002
0.4 2.920e-002 2.643e-002 2.047e-002 1.755e-002
1.541e-002 8.470e-002 4.753e-002
0.5 2.814e-002 2.825e-002 1.879e-002 1.795e-002
1.505e-002 8.090e-002 4.041e-002
0.75 2.407e-002 2.324e-002 1.524e-002 1.798e-002
1.347e-002 7.260e-002 2.827e-002
1 1.986e-002 1.769e-002 1.208e-002 1.362e-002
1.161e-002 6.747e-002 2.109e-002
2 1.219e-002 1.033e-002 6.870e-003 7.674e-003
7.690e-003 4.619e-002 1.063e-002
3 8.053e-003 7.637e-003 5.384e-003 4.913e-003
5.590e-003 2.640e-002 7.083e-003
4 5.749e-003 5.810e-003 4.584e-003 3.445e-003
3.906e-003 1.668e-002 5.313e-003
Source: Hurricane Fault Zone - Ash Creek Section
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 215.98 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 6.80 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 5.865e-003 4.181e-003 3.699e-003 4.459e-003
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 39 of 93
4.228e-003 1.489e-002 1.062e-002
0.05 7.371e-003 4.624e-003 3.884e-003 5.749e-003
5.051e-003 2.032e-002 1.478e-002
0.1 8.742e-003 5.263e-003 5.048e-003 5.687e-003
5.616e-003 2.716e-002 1.703e-002
0.2 1.213e-002 6.686e-003 8.430e-003 6.556e-003
6.011e-003 3.617e-002 2.979e-002
0.3 1.286e-002 7.794e-003 9.328e-003 8.004e-003
6.130e-003 3.894e-002 2.710e-002
0.4 1.236e-002 9.158e-003 8.787e-003 7.971e-003
5.995e-003 3.715e-002 2.267e-002
0.5 1.139e-002 9.417e-003 7.799e-003 7.757e-003
5.779e-003 3.421e-002 1.815e-002
0.75 9.131e-003 7.293e-003 5.986e-003 7.116e-003
5.015e-003 2.903e-002 1.146e-002
1 7.260e-003 5.381e-003 4.598e-003 5.265e-003
4.228e-003 2.560e-002 8.048e-003
2 4.080e-003 2.957e-003 2.286e-003 2.736e-003
2.604e-003 1.586e-002 3.777e-003
3 2.539e-003 2.093e-003 1.668e-003 1.670e-003
1.796e-003 8.413e-003 2.518e-003
4 1.740e-003 1.502e-003 1.354e-003 1.168e-003
1.200e-003 5.070e-003 1.888e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.018e-002 7.892e-003 7.188e-003 8.001e-003
7.436e-003 2.346e-002 1.734e-002
0.05 1.329e-002 8.800e-003 7.952e-003 1.089e-002
9.164e-003 3.233e-002 2.698e-002
0.1 1.626e-002 1.018e-002 1.080e-002 1.130e-002
1.043e-002 4.452e-002 3.264e-002
0.2 2.221e-002 1.310e-002 1.720e-002 1.248e-002
1.143e-002 6.108e-002 5.257e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 40 of 93
0.3 2.368e-002 1.546e-002 1.882e-002 1.516e-002
1.182e-002 6.643e-002 4.782e-002
0.4 2.303e-002 1.831e-002 1.773e-002 1.520e-002
1.167e-002 6.401e-002 4.047e-002
0.5 2.156e-002 1.899e-002 1.595e-002 1.503e-002
1.132e-002 6.006e-002 3.292e-002
0.75 1.773e-002 1.490e-002 1.259e-002 1.445e-002
9.926e-003 5.212e-002 2.146e-002
1 1.430e-002 1.113e-002 9.771e-003 1.078e-002
8.406e-003 4.732e-002 1.549e-002
2 8.245e-003 6.225e-003 4.953e-003 5.549e-003
5.209e-003 3.061e-002 7.967e-003
3 5.206e-003 4.368e-003 3.645e-003 3.392e-003
3.572e-003 1.680e-002 5.311e-003
4 3.569e-003 3.107e-003 2.910e-003 2.304e-003
2.376e-003 1.032e-002 3.983e-003
Source: Hurricane Fault Zone - Cedar City Section
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 207.31 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 7.00 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 7.491e-003 5.730e-003 4.845e-003 5.794e-003
5.865e-003 1.813e-002 1.232e-002
0.05 9.342e-003 6.382e-003 5.122e-003 7.529e-003
7.128e-003 2.430e-002 1.681e-002
0.1 1.103e-002 7.358e-003 6.545e-003 7.325e-003
8.070e-003 3.247e-002 1.921e-002
0.2 1.506e-002 9.365e-003 1.050e-002 8.145e-003
8.486e-003 4.436e-002 3.327e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 41 of 93
0.3 1.607e-002 1.081e-002 1.144e-002 9.968e-003
8.452e-003 4.829e-002 3.110e-002
0.4 1.557e-002 1.256e-002 1.071e-002 9.854e-003
8.120e-003 4.645e-002 2.674e-002
0.5 1.443e-002 1.287e-002 9.502e-003 9.577e-003
7.732e-003 4.303e-002 2.188e-002
0.75 1.168e-002 1.010e-002 7.268e-003 8.758e-003
6.623e-003 3.695e-002 1.432e-002
1 9.331e-003 7.525e-003 5.587e-003 6.444e-003
5.554e-003 3.286e-002 1.023e-002
2 5.347e-003 4.188e-003 2.885e-003 3.473e-003
3.436e-003 2.076e-002 4.749e-003
3 3.402e-003 3.040e-003 2.185e-003 2.173e-003
2.410e-003 1.124e-002 3.166e-003
4 2.386e-003 2.279e-003 1.831e-003 1.547e-003
1.646e-003 6.875e-003 2.375e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.296e-002 1.075e-002 9.377e-003 1.040e-002
1.031e-002 2.780e-002 2.011e-002
0.05 1.678e-002 1.207e-002 1.046e-002 1.426e-002
1.293e-002 3.763e-002 3.069e-002
0.1 2.039e-002 1.415e-002 1.397e-002 1.455e-002
1.499e-002 5.182e-002 3.681e-002
0.2 2.741e-002 1.823e-002 2.132e-002 1.550e-002
1.614e-002 7.294e-002 5.871e-002
0.3 2.940e-002 2.132e-002 2.295e-002 1.888e-002
1.630e-002 8.019e-002 5.487e-002
0.4 2.878e-002 2.497e-002 2.151e-002 1.879e-002
1.580e-002 7.791e-002 4.773e-002
0.5 2.710e-002 2.581e-002 1.934e-002 1.856e-002
1.515e-002 7.362e-002 3.969e-002
0.75 2.248e-002 2.051e-002 1.522e-002 1.778e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 42 of 93
1.311e-002 6.474e-002 2.682e-002
1 1.821e-002 1.548e-002 1.182e-002 1.319e-002
1.104e-002 5.931e-002 1.969e-002
2 1.071e-002 8.768e-003 6.214e-003 7.045e-003
6.874e-003 3.923e-002 1.002e-002
3 6.928e-003 6.310e-003 4.776e-003 4.414e-003
4.792e-003 2.202e-002 6.679e-003
4 4.862e-003 4.689e-003 3.937e-003 3.053e-003
3.259e-003 1.374e-002 5.009e-003
Source: Hurricane Fault Zone - Southern Section
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 281.12 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 7.30 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 5.650e-003 3.854e-003 2.875e-003 3.716e-003
4.140e-003 1.685e-002 1.048e-002
0.05 6.617e-003 4.046e-003 2.648e-003 4.433e-003
4.474e-003 2.208e-002 1.289e-002
0.1 7.525e-003 4.176e-003 3.203e-003 3.777e-003
4.670e-003 2.951e-002 1.409e-002
0.2 1.102e-002 5.750e-003 5.852e-003 4.469e-003
5.022e-003 4.208e-002 2.597e-002
0.3 1.277e-002 7.905e-003 7.390e-003 6.353e-003
5.484e-003 4.779e-002 2.570e-002
0.4 1.323e-002 1.081e-002 7.614e-003 6.894e-003
5.664e-003 4.723e-002 2.313e-002
0.5 1.288e-002 1.211e-002 7.160e-003 7.334e-003
5.711e-003 4.466e-002 1.955e-002
0.75 1.116e-002 1.025e-002 5.967e-003 7.517e-003
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 43 of 93
5.404e-003 3.985e-002 1.345e-002
1 9.277e-003 7.732e-003 4.821e-003 5.878e-003
4.839e-003 3.641e-002 9.819e-003
2 5.806e-003 4.602e-003 2.887e-003 3.493e-003
3.515e-003 2.456e-002 4.506e-003
3 3.824e-003 3.516e-003 2.313e-003 2.251e-003
2.708e-003 1.366e-002 3.004e-003
4 2.751e-003 2.767e-003 2.035e-003 1.629e-003
1.941e-003 8.508e-003 2.253e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 9.671e-003 7.229e-003 5.706e-003 6.668e-003
7.281e-003 2.584e-002 1.710e-002
0.05 1.170e-002 7.651e-003 5.482e-003 8.396e-003
8.118e-003 3.420e-002 2.354e-002
0.1 1.364e-002 8.029e-003 6.938e-003 7.501e-003
8.677e-003 4.709e-002 2.700e-002
0.2 1.980e-002 1.119e-002 1.224e-002 8.506e-003
9.554e-003 6.919e-002 4.582e-002
0.3 2.318e-002 1.558e-002 1.536e-002 1.203e-002
1.057e-002 7.936e-002 4.534e-002
0.4 2.434e-002 2.149e-002 1.578e-002 1.315e-002
1.102e-002 7.922e-002 4.128e-002
0.5 2.412e-002 2.429e-002 1.498e-002 1.421e-002
1.119e-002 7.640e-002 3.546e-002
0.75 2.142e-002 2.083e-002 1.282e-002 1.526e-002
1.070e-002 6.983e-002 2.518e-002
1 1.807e-002 1.591e-002 1.049e-002 1.203e-002
9.622e-003 6.574e-002 1.890e-002
2 1.161e-002 9.634e-003 6.361e-003 7.084e-003
7.032e-003 4.641e-002 9.505e-003
3 7.771e-003 7.297e-003 5.055e-003 4.573e-003
5.386e-003 2.675e-002 6.336e-003
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 44 of 93
4 5.601e-003 5.694e-003 4.375e-003 3.215e-003
3.845e-003 1.700e-002 4.752e-003
Source: Joes Valley Fault Zone
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 137.69 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 7.40 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.990e-002 1.883e-002 1.518e-002 1.750e-002
1.800e-002 3.664e-002 2.338e-002
0.05 2.568e-002 2.217e-002 1.778e-002 2.470e-002
2.448e-002 4.770e-002 3.088e-002
0.1 3.112e-002 2.838e-002 2.237e-002 2.506e-002
3.050e-002 6.375e-002 3.481e-002
0.2 3.838e-002 3.445e-002 2.985e-002 2.421e-002
3.066e-002 8.986e-002 5.557e-002
0.3 3.870e-002 3.467e-002 2.865e-002 2.684e-002
2.743e-002 9.688e-002 5.496e-002
0.4 3.616e-002 3.515e-002 2.509e-002 2.456e-002
2.427e-002 9.294e-002 5.052e-002
0.5 3.285e-002 3.372e-002 2.153e-002 2.250e-002
2.172e-002 8.585e-002 4.370e-002
0.75 2.597e-002 2.600e-002 1.560e-002 1.891e-002
1.696e-002 7.346e-002 3.134e-002
1 2.048e-002 1.968e-002 1.172e-002 1.329e-002
1.344e-002 6.515e-002 2.337e-002
2 1.153e-002 1.081e-002 6.216e-003 7.540e-003
7.448e-003 4.089e-002 1.037e-002
3 7.601e-003 7.971e-003 5.066e-003 4.990e-003
5.068e-003 2.290e-002 6.911e-003
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 45 of 93
4 5.505e-003 5.990e-003 4.515e-003 3.722e-003
3.531e-003 1.435e-002 5.183e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 3.477e-002 3.531e-002 2.827e-002 3.141e-002
3.165e-002 5.618e-002 3.816e-002
0.05 4.677e-002 4.192e-002 3.561e-002 4.677e-002
4.441e-002 7.388e-002 5.638e-002
0.1 5.837e-002 5.455e-002 4.666e-002 4.976e-002
5.666e-002 1.017e-001 6.669e-002
0.2 7.046e-002 6.708e-002 5.792e-002 4.608e-002
5.831e-002 1.477e-001 9.806e-002
0.3 7.108e-002 6.835e-002 5.440e-002 5.083e-002
5.289e-002 1.609e-001 9.697e-002
0.4 6.697e-002 6.989e-002 4.786e-002 4.684e-002
4.723e-002 1.559e-001 9.018e-002
0.5 6.175e-002 6.762e-002 4.188e-002 4.360e-002
4.256e-002 1.469e-001 7.925e-002
0.75 4.996e-002 5.281e-002 3.133e-002 3.839e-002
3.357e-002 1.287e-001 5.869e-002
1 3.989e-002 4.048e-002 2.374e-002 2.721e-002
2.672e-002 1.176e-001 4.499e-002
2 2.299e-002 2.264e-002 1.257e-002 1.529e-002
1.490e-002 7.726e-002 2.187e-002
3 1.537e-002 1.654e-002 1.035e-002 1.014e-002
1.008e-002 4.486e-002 1.458e-002
4 1.113e-002 1.232e-002 9.209e-003 7.343e-003
6.992e-003 2.866e-002 1.093e-002
Source: Lisbon Valley Fault Zone (Class B)
Region: Utah Deterministic
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 46 of 93
Closest Distance: 127.07 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 6.90 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.504e-002 1.319e-002 1.197e-002 1.390e-002
1.220e-002 2.820e-002 1.968e-002
0.05 2.015e-002 1.566e-002 1.457e-002 1.998e-002
1.689e-002 3.813e-002 2.915e-002
0.1 2.507e-002 2.037e-002 1.925e-002 2.186e-002
2.113e-002 5.096e-002 3.451e-002
0.2 3.091e-002 2.401e-002 2.630e-002 2.196e-002
2.136e-002 6.773e-002 5.413e-002
0.3 2.988e-002 2.312e-002 2.459e-002 2.285e-002
1.900e-002 7.042e-002 4.921e-002
0.4 2.693e-002 2.262e-002 2.100e-002 2.044e-002
1.671e-002 6.588e-002 4.184e-002
0.5 2.375e-002 2.116e-002 1.765e-002 1.814e-002
1.487e-002 5.972e-002 3.408e-002
0.75 1.797e-002 1.555e-002 1.246e-002 1.466e-002
1.141e-002 4.930e-002 2.223e-002
1 1.381e-002 1.153e-002 9.166e-003 1.016e-002
8.918e-003 4.264e-002 1.588e-002
2 7.286e-003 6.064e-003 4.270e-003 5.167e-003
4.690e-003 2.519e-002 7.284e-003
3 4.570e-003 4.258e-003 3.172e-003 3.219e-003
3.022e-003 1.350e-002 4.856e-003
4 3.179e-003 3.065e-003 2.610e-003 2.299e-003
1.997e-003 8.200e-003 3.642e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 47 of 93
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 2.627e-002 2.482e-002 2.213e-002 2.495e-002
2.146e-002 4.383e-002 3.213e-002
0.05 3.676e-002 2.971e-002 2.905e-002 3.783e-002
3.065e-002 5.986e-002 5.321e-002
0.1 4.724e-002 3.928e-002 3.996e-002 4.342e-002
3.925e-002 8.242e-002 6.613e-002
0.2 5.681e-002 4.687e-002 5.055e-002 4.180e-002
4.063e-002 1.129e-001 9.550e-002
0.3 5.489e-002 4.572e-002 4.615e-002 4.329e-002
3.664e-002 1.185e-001 8.683e-002
0.4 4.991e-002 4.510e-002 3.962e-002 3.898e-002
3.252e-002 1.120e-001 7.467e-002
0.5 4.470e-002 4.255e-002 3.401e-002 3.515e-002
2.913e-002 1.035e-001 6.182e-002
0.75 3.467e-002 3.168e-002 2.480e-002 2.976e-002
2.258e-002 8.745e-002 4.164e-002
1 2.699e-002 2.380e-002 1.840e-002 2.080e-002
1.773e-002 7.788e-002 3.056e-002
2 1.458e-002 1.273e-002 8.565e-003 1.048e-002
9.383e-003 4.810e-002 1.536e-002
3 9.260e-003 8.862e-003 6.414e-003 6.538e-003
6.009e-003 2.671e-002 1.024e-002
4 6.440e-003 6.324e-003 5.278e-003 4.536e-003
3.955e-003 1.653e-002 7.682e-003
Source: Main Street Fault Zone
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 265.49 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 7.40 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 48 of 93
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 6.856e-003 5.024e-003 3.695e-003 4.686e-003
5.347e-003 1.933e-002 1.173e-002
0.05 8.019e-003 5.340e-003 3.481e-003 5.678e-003
5.934e-003 2.516e-002 1.416e-002
0.1 9.104e-003 5.643e-003 4.191e-003 4.861e-003
6.333e-003 3.363e-002 1.536e-002
0.2 1.309e-002 7.686e-003 7.314e-003 5.563e-003
6.728e-003 4.834e-002 2.799e-002
0.3 1.514e-002 1.025e-002 8.955e-003 7.782e-003
7.155e-003 5.493e-002 2.816e-002
0.4 1.565e-002 1.358e-002 9.072e-003 8.299e-003
7.242e-003 5.434e-002 2.580e-002
0.5 1.523e-002 1.500e-002 8.458e-003 8.719e-003
7.191e-003 5.141e-002 2.212e-002
0.75 1.316e-002 1.265e-002 6.948e-003 8.793e-003
6.655e-003 4.594e-002 1.557e-002
1 1.091e-002 9.571e-003 5.578e-003 6.790e-003
5.882e-003 4.202e-002 1.149e-002
2 6.820e-003 5.680e-003 3.364e-003 4.085e-003
4.165e-003 2.840e-002 5.211e-003
3 4.528e-003 4.351e-003 2.745e-003 2.667e-003
3.186e-003 1.591e-002 3.474e-003
4 3.281e-003 3.423e-003 2.454e-003 1.949e-003
2.293e-003 9.967e-003 2.605e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 49 of 93
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.179e-002 9.422e-003 7.322e-003 8.410e-003
9.404e-003 2.964e-002 1.915e-002
0.05 1.425e-002 1.010e-002 7.201e-003 1.075e-002
1.077e-002 3.897e-002 2.585e-002
0.1 1.658e-002 1.085e-002 9.070e-003 9.655e-003
1.177e-002 5.366e-002 2.942e-002
0.2 2.361e-002 1.496e-002 1.527e-002 1.059e-002
1.280e-002 7.948e-002 4.938e-002
0.3 2.755e-002 2.020e-002 1.858e-002 1.474e-002
1.380e-002 9.121e-002 4.969e-002
0.4 2.886e-002 2.701e-002 1.879e-002 1.583e-002
1.409e-002 9.113e-002 4.605e-002
0.5 2.856e-002 3.008e-002 1.770e-002 1.690e-002
1.409e-002 8.795e-002 4.012e-002
0.75 2.529e-002 2.569e-002 1.493e-002 1.785e-002
1.317e-002 8.050e-002 2.915e-002
1 2.128e-002 1.969e-002 1.212e-002 1.390e-002
1.170e-002 7.585e-002 2.211e-002
2 1.365e-002 1.189e-002 7.410e-003 8.285e-003
8.332e-003 5.368e-002 1.099e-002
3 9.206e-003 9.031e-003 5.999e-003 5.417e-003
6.336e-003 3.117e-002 7.328e-003
4 6.682e-003 7.043e-003 5.276e-003 3.846e-003
4.541e-003 1.991e-002 5.496e-003
Source: Markagunt Plateau Faults (Class B)
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 162.28 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 7.20 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 50 of 93
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.325e-002 1.162e-002 9.623e-003 1.120e-002
1.146e-002 2.703e-002 1.771e-002
0.05 1.690e-002 1.342e-002 1.090e-002 1.533e-002
1.501e-002 3.566e-002 2.405e-002
0.1 2.029e-002 1.655e-002 1.386e-002 1.540e-002
1.807e-002 4.766e-002 2.744e-002
0.2 2.601e-002 2.040e-002 1.980e-002 1.573e-002
1.843e-002 6.618e-002 4.523e-002
0.3 2.678e-002 2.151e-002 1.983e-002 1.803e-002
1.710e-002 7.152e-002 4.335e-002
0.4 2.532e-002 2.286e-002 1.773e-002 1.693e-002
1.555e-002 6.862e-002 3.849e-002
0.5 2.313e-002 2.242e-002 1.536e-002 1.580e-002
1.421e-002 6.341e-002 3.236e-002
0.75 1.839e-002 1.734e-002 1.130e-002 1.366e-002
1.144e-002 5.426e-002 2.216e-002
1 1.454e-002 1.302e-002 8.535e-003 9.740e-003
9.247e-003 4.812e-002 1.617e-002
2 8.209e-003 7.168e-003 4.419e-003 5.355e-003
5.324e-003 3.021e-002 7.345e-003
3 5.317e-003 5.233e-003 3.472e-003 3.447e-003
3.652e-003 1.666e-002 4.896e-003
4 3.789e-003 3.916e-003 3.001e-003 2.514e-003
2.517e-003 1.032e-002 3.672e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 2.309e-002 2.180e-002 1.820e-002 2.010e-002
2.016e-002 4.145e-002 2.890e-002
0.05 3.064e-002 2.537e-002 2.200e-002 2.903e-002
2.722e-002 5.524e-002 4.391e-002
0.1 3.789e-002 3.182e-002 2.916e-002 3.059e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 51 of 93
3.357e-002 7.606e-002 5.258e-002
0.2 4.763e-002 3.972e-002 3.912e-002 2.994e-002
3.505e-002 1.088e-001 7.981e-002
0.3 4.913e-002 4.241e-002 3.848e-002 3.415e-002
3.296e-002 1.188e-001 7.650e-002
0.4 4.688e-002 4.544e-002 3.452e-002 3.229e-002
3.026e-002 1.151e-001 6.870e-002
0.5 4.349e-002 4.496e-002 3.042e-002 3.062e-002
2.784e-002 1.085e-001 5.869e-002
0.75 3.539e-002 3.521e-002 2.308e-002 2.774e-002
2.265e-002 9.507e-002 4.149e-002
1 2.834e-002 2.680e-002 1.760e-002 1.994e-002
1.839e-002 8.687e-002 3.113e-002
2 1.640e-002 1.501e-002 9.164e-003 1.086e-002
1.065e-002 5.709e-002 1.549e-002
3 1.079e-002 1.086e-002 7.321e-003 7.003e-003
7.262e-003 3.263e-002 1.033e-002
4 7.690e-003 8.057e-003 6.264e-003 4.959e-003
4.985e-003 2.062e-002 7.747e-003
Source: Mineral Mountains (West Side) Faults
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 203.99 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 6.90 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 7.065e-003 5.320e-003 4.618e-003 5.514e-003
5.386e-003 1.708e-002 1.189e-002
0.05 8.888e-003 5.940e-003 4.929e-003 7.200e-003
6.575e-003 2.310e-002 1.649e-002
0.1 1.055e-002 6.883e-003 6.367e-003 7.130e-003
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 52 of 93
7.450e-003 3.087e-002 1.898e-002
0.2 1.440e-002 8.694e-003 1.025e-002 7.987e-003
7.864e-003 4.162e-002 3.278e-002
0.3 1.521e-002 9.919e-003 1.108e-002 9.634e-003
7.832e-003 4.493e-002 3.018e-002
0.4 1.460e-002 1.140e-002 1.032e-002 9.470e-003
7.522e-003 4.298e-002 2.560e-002
0.5 1.344e-002 1.161e-002 9.107e-003 9.135e-003
7.157e-003 3.964e-002 2.072e-002
0.75 1.077e-002 9.004e-003 6.923e-003 8.277e-003
6.104e-003 3.376e-002 1.333e-002
1 8.559e-003 6.678e-003 5.297e-003 6.070e-003
5.099e-003 2.986e-002 9.444e-003
2 4.831e-003 3.677e-003 2.663e-003 3.200e-003
3.105e-003 1.861e-002 4.405e-003
3 3.040e-003 2.639e-003 1.979e-003 1.979e-003
2.147e-003 9.977e-003 2.936e-003
4 2.111e-003 1.948e-003 1.632e-003 1.398e-003
1.448e-003 6.058e-003 2.202e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.226e-002 1.001e-002 8.925e-003 9.895e-003
9.473e-003 2.656e-002 1.940e-002
0.05 1.602e-002 1.127e-002 1.006e-002 1.364e-002
1.193e-002 3.626e-002 3.010e-002
0.1 1.960e-002 1.327e-002 1.357e-002 1.416e-002
1.384e-002 4.993e-002 3.636e-002
0.2 2.630e-002 1.698e-002 2.078e-002 1.520e-002
1.496e-002 6.935e-002 5.784e-002
0.3 2.792e-002 1.961e-002 2.219e-002 1.825e-002
1.510e-002 7.562e-002 5.326e-002
0.4 2.710e-002 2.274e-002 2.067e-002 1.806e-002
1.464e-002 7.306e-002 4.568e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 53 of 93
0.5 2.534e-002 2.335e-002 1.851e-002 1.770e-002
1.402e-002 6.870e-002 3.758e-002
0.75 2.083e-002 1.834e-002 1.447e-002 1.680e-002
1.208e-002 5.989e-002 2.496e-002
1 1.678e-002 1.378e-002 1.119e-002 1.243e-002
1.014e-002 5.453e-002 1.818e-002
2 9.711e-003 7.719e-003 5.720e-003 6.491e-003
6.213e-003 3.554e-002 9.291e-003
3 6.214e-003 5.491e-003 4.326e-003 4.019e-003
4.270e-003 1.973e-002 6.194e-003
4 4.317e-003 4.020e-003 3.509e-003 2.757e-003
2.868e-003 1.221e-002 4.646e-003
Source: Moab Fault and Deformation Zones (Class B)
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 130.57 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 7.30 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.988e-002 1.859e-002 1.552e-002 1.778e-002
1.769e-002 3.603e-002 2.361e-002
0.05 2.599e-002 2.201e-002 1.850e-002 2.535e-002
2.435e-002 4.721e-002 3.229e-002
0.1 3.179e-002 2.848e-002 2.355e-002 2.631e-002
3.056e-002 6.310e-002 3.695e-002
0.2 3.894e-002 3.424e-002 3.123e-002 2.545e-002
3.066e-002 8.795e-002 5.825e-002
0.3 3.866e-002 3.380e-002 2.953e-002 2.757e-002
2.721e-002 9.394e-002 5.648e-002
0.4 3.569e-002 3.368e-002 2.558e-002 2.497e-002
2.391e-002 8.957e-002 5.105e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 54 of 93
0.5 3.212e-002 3.199e-002 2.179e-002 2.259e-002
2.128e-002 8.236e-002 4.359e-002
0.75 2.508e-002 2.437e-002 1.563e-002 1.869e-002
1.644e-002 6.986e-002 3.067e-002
1 1.963e-002 1.838e-002 1.166e-002 1.306e-002
1.294e-002 6.158e-002 2.267e-002
2 1.087e-002 9.994e-003 5.997e-003 7.234e-003
7.034e-003 3.808e-002 1.013e-002
3 7.101e-003 7.297e-003 4.798e-003 4.734e-003
4.714e-003 2.117e-002 6.754e-003
4 5.106e-003 5.440e-003 4.207e-003 3.504e-003
3.250e-003 1.319e-002 5.066e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 3.471e-002 3.487e-002 2.876e-002 3.190e-002
3.111e-002 5.525e-002 3.854e-002
0.05 4.736e-002 4.163e-002 3.694e-002 4.800e-002
4.418e-002 7.312e-002 5.896e-002
0.1 5.970e-002 5.475e-002 4.895e-002 5.225e-002
5.677e-002 1.007e-001 7.081e-002
0.2 7.146e-002 6.666e-002 6.020e-002 4.844e-002
5.832e-002 1.446e-001 1.028e-001
0.3 7.095e-002 6.664e-002 5.561e-002 5.222e-002
5.245e-002 1.560e-001 9.966e-002
0.4 6.604e-002 6.697e-002 4.843e-002 4.761e-002
4.652e-002 1.502e-001 9.111e-002
0.5 6.034e-002 6.415e-002 4.211e-002 4.377e-002
4.169e-002 1.409e-001 7.907e-002
0.75 4.822e-002 4.951e-002 3.120e-002 3.794e-002
3.254e-002 1.224e-001 5.743e-002
1 3.823e-002 3.782e-002 2.348e-002 2.674e-002
2.572e-002 1.112e-001 4.364e-002
2 2.167e-002 2.092e-002 1.203e-002 1.467e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 55 of 93
1.407e-002 7.196e-002 2.137e-002
3 1.434e-002 1.514e-002 9.702e-003 9.616e-003
9.374e-003 4.147e-002 1.425e-002
4 1.031e-002 1.119e-002 8.508e-003 6.914e-003
6.436e-003 2.636e-002 1.069e-002
Source: Needles Fault Zone (Class B)
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 60.09 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 6.80 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 3.619e-002 3.461e-002 3.159e-002 3.758e-002
2.750e-002 5.880e-002 4.051e-002
0.05 5.227e-002 4.336e-002 4.304e-002 5.921e-002
4.217e-002 8.025e-002 6.687e-002
0.1 6.882e-002 6.234e-002 5.815e-002 7.103e-002
5.745e-002 1.073e-001 8.298e-002
0.2 7.760e-002 6.884e-002 7.098e-002 6.666e-002
5.646e-002 1.376e-001 1.126e-001
0.3 6.771e-002 5.694e-002 5.973e-002 5.932e-002
4.607e-002 1.338e-001 9.917e-002
0.4 5.719e-002 4.823e-002 4.802e-002 4.986e-002
3.790e-002 1.203e-001 8.359e-002
0.5 4.827e-002 4.178e-002 3.904e-002 4.162e-002
3.203e-002 1.057e-001 6.808e-002
0.75 3.435e-002 2.901e-002 2.625e-002 3.037e-002
2.260e-002 8.245e-002 4.464e-002
1 2.557e-002 2.141e-002 1.881e-002 2.068e-002
1.670e-002 6.850e-002 3.201e-002
2 1.244e-002 1.071e-002 8.111e-003 1.015e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 56 of 93
7.687e-003 3.672e-002 1.437e-002
3 7.734e-003 7.302e-003 5.907e-003 6.316e-003
4.620e-003 1.948e-002 9.577e-003
4 5.349e-003 5.019e-003 4.756e-003 4.540e-003
2.968e-003 1.174e-002 7.183e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 6.363e-002 6.532e-002 5.766e-002 6.744e-002
4.836e-002 9.264e-002 6.612e-002
0.05 9.614e-002 8.250e-002 8.476e-002 1.121e-001
7.650e-002 1.277e-001 1.221e-001
0.1 1.307e-001 1.206e-001 1.177e-001 1.410e-001
1.067e-001 1.758e-001 1.590e-001
0.2 1.433e-001 1.348e-001 1.317e-001 1.269e-001
1.074e-001 2.323e-001 1.987e-001
0.3 1.250e-001 1.129e-001 1.091e-001 1.124e-001
8.881e-002 2.282e-001 1.750e-001
0.4 1.064e-001 9.645e-002 8.869e-002 9.509e-002
7.376e-002 2.072e-001 1.492e-001
0.5 9.119e-002 8.426e-002 7.374e-002 8.065e-002
6.275e-002 1.856e-001 1.235e-001
0.75 6.658e-002 5.925e-002 5.144e-002 6.165e-002
4.473e-002 1.480e-001 8.361e-002
1 5.028e-002 4.429e-002 3.746e-002 4.233e-002
3.321e-002 1.266e-001 6.161e-002
2 2.508e-002 2.255e-002 1.627e-002 2.059e-002
1.538e-002 7.086e-002 3.030e-002
3 1.575e-002 1.524e-002 1.195e-002 1.283e-002
9.187e-003 3.889e-002 2.020e-002
4 1.087e-002 1.038e-002 9.616e-003 8.958e-003
5.878e-003 2.388e-002 1.515e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 57 of 93
Source: Paradox Valley Graben (Class B)
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 158.05 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 7.20 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.384e-002 1.219e-002 1.021e-002 1.176e-002
1.202e-002 2.776e-002 1.829e-002
0.05 1.772e-002 1.413e-002 1.166e-002 1.619e-002
1.585e-002 3.663e-002 2.495e-002
0.1 2.133e-002 1.754e-002 1.485e-002 1.636e-002
1.919e-002 4.895e-002 2.852e-002
0.2 2.719e-002 2.153e-002 2.099e-002 1.661e-002
1.952e-002 6.791e-002 4.671e-002
0.3 2.784e-002 2.249e-002 2.084e-002 1.888e-002
1.800e-002 7.324e-002 4.474e-002
0.4 2.622e-002 2.369e-002 1.853e-002 1.764e-002
1.630e-002 7.018e-002 3.973e-002
0.5 2.389e-002 2.313e-002 1.600e-002 1.639e-002
1.484e-002 6.479e-002 3.341e-002
0.75 1.893e-002 1.783e-002 1.173e-002 1.408e-002
1.188e-002 5.534e-002 2.290e-002
1 1.493e-002 1.340e-002 8.832e-003 1.001e-002
9.559e-003 4.902e-002 1.672e-002
2 8.397e-003 7.353e-003 4.551e-003 5.493e-003
5.452e-003 3.068e-002 7.586e-003
3 5.437e-003 5.362e-003 3.575e-003 3.538e-003
3.720e-003 1.692e-002 5.057e-003
4 3.875e-003 4.007e-003 3.090e-003 2.582e-003
2.560e-003 1.048e-002 3.793e-003
Fractile: 0.84
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 58 of 93
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 2.412e-002 2.287e-002 1.925e-002 2.111e-002
2.114e-002 4.256e-002 2.986e-002
0.05 3.215e-002 2.671e-002 2.349e-002 3.066e-002
2.876e-002 5.673e-002 4.555e-002
0.1 3.989e-002 3.371e-002 3.119e-002 3.250e-002
3.565e-002 7.811e-002 5.465e-002
0.2 4.981e-002 4.191e-002 4.135e-002 3.162e-002
3.714e-002 1.116e-001 8.242e-002
0.3 5.108e-002 4.435e-002 4.028e-002 3.576e-002
3.471e-002 1.216e-001 7.894e-002
0.4 4.854e-002 4.710e-002 3.595e-002 3.364e-002
3.171e-002 1.177e-001 7.091e-002
0.5 4.490e-002 4.638e-002 3.159e-002 3.176e-002
2.907e-002 1.108e-001 6.060e-002
0.75 3.642e-002 3.622e-002 2.387e-002 2.859e-002
2.351e-002 9.697e-002 4.288e-002
1 2.911e-002 2.756e-002 1.815e-002 2.049e-002
1.901e-002 8.850e-002 3.219e-002
2 1.677e-002 1.539e-002 9.394e-003 1.114e-002
1.091e-002 5.798e-002 1.600e-002
3 1.102e-002 1.113e-002 7.495e-003 7.187e-003
7.398e-003 3.314e-002 1.067e-002
4 7.861e-003 8.245e-003 6.421e-003 5.094e-003
5.070e-003 2.095e-002 8.002e-003
Source: Paunsaugunt
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 113.81 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 7.00 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 59 of 93
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.895e-002 1.731e-002 1.527e-002 1.802e-002
1.567e-002 3.385e-002 2.312e-002
0.05 2.560e-002 2.077e-002 1.891e-002 2.637e-002
2.215e-002 4.538e-002 3.422e-002
0.1 3.205e-002 2.756e-002 2.484e-002 2.906e-002
2.822e-002 6.064e-002 4.052e-002
0.2 3.870e-002 3.224e-002 3.282e-002 2.833e-002
2.828e-002 8.139e-002 6.221e-002
0.3 3.695e-002 3.030e-002 3.008e-002 2.886e-002
2.466e-002 8.445e-002 5.724e-002
0.4 3.307e-002 2.892e-002 2.544e-002 2.546e-002
2.137e-002 7.899e-002 4.938e-002
0.5 2.907e-002 2.674e-002 2.130e-002 2.235e-002
1.880e-002 7.159e-002 4.073e-002
0.75 2.193e-002 1.966e-002 1.494e-002 1.775e-002
1.420e-002 5.908e-002 2.713e-002
1 1.683e-002 1.464e-002 1.096e-002 1.222e-002
1.099e-002 5.108e-002 1.957e-002
2 8.883e-003 7.706e-003 5.172e-003 6.312e-003
5.698e-003 3.016e-002 8.898e-003
3 5.632e-003 5.451e-003 3.913e-003 3.989e-003
3.674e-003 1.633e-002 5.932e-003
4 3.957e-003 3.964e-003 3.269e-003 2.883e-003
2.451e-003 9.988e-003 4.449e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 60 of 93
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 3.303e-002 3.246e-002 2.796e-002 3.234e-002
2.756e-002 5.191e-002 3.774e-002
0.05 4.666e-002 3.928e-002 3.751e-002 4.993e-002
4.018e-002 7.028e-002 6.249e-002
0.1 6.032e-002 5.298e-002 5.127e-002 5.770e-002
5.243e-002 9.678e-002 7.764e-002
0.2 7.093e-002 6.277e-002 6.238e-002 5.393e-002
5.380e-002 1.338e-001 1.098e-001
0.3 6.765e-002 5.975e-002 5.567e-002 5.467e-002
4.755e-002 1.402e-001 1.010e-001
0.4 6.106e-002 5.750e-002 4.739e-002 4.854e-002
4.158e-002 1.325e-001 8.813e-002
0.5 5.450e-002 5.363e-002 4.057e-002 4.330e-002
3.683e-002 1.225e-001 7.387e-002
0.75 4.213e-002 3.993e-002 2.941e-002 3.604e-002
2.810e-002 1.035e-001 5.080e-002
1 3.275e-002 3.013e-002 2.182e-002 2.502e-002
2.185e-002 9.221e-002 3.766e-002
2 1.772e-002 1.613e-002 1.038e-002 1.280e-002
1.140e-002 5.699e-002 1.877e-002
3 1.138e-002 1.131e-002 7.914e-003 8.103e-003
7.306e-003 3.199e-002 1.251e-002
4 7.996e-003 8.157e-003 6.610e-003 5.689e-003
4.854e-003 1.995e-002 9.385e-003
Source: Price River Area Faults (Class B)
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 167.00 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 7.10 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 61 of 93
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.169e-002 9.934e-003 8.456e-003 9.796e-003
9.865e-003 2.442e-002 1.637e-002
0.05 1.493e-002 1.143e-002 9.546e-003 1.334e-002
1.282e-002 3.247e-002 2.262e-002
0.1 1.795e-002 1.400e-002 1.224e-002 1.349e-002
1.531e-002 4.339e-002 2.600e-002
0.2 2.322e-002 1.725e-002 1.781e-002 1.403e-002
1.569e-002 5.962e-002 4.306e-002
0.3 2.389e-002 1.831e-002 1.795e-002 1.609e-002
1.469e-002 6.419e-002 4.063e-002
0.4 2.255e-002 1.959e-002 1.608e-002 1.517e-002
1.345e-002 6.141e-002 3.550e-002
0.5 2.055e-002 1.927e-002 1.393e-002 1.417e-002
1.235e-002 5.663e-002 2.948e-002
0.75 1.628e-002 1.483e-002 1.026e-002 1.229e-002
1.000e-002 4.825e-002 1.978e-002
1 1.284e-002 1.109e-002 7.740e-003 8.778e-003
8.107e-003 4.267e-002 1.430e-002
2 7.199e-003 6.077e-003 3.928e-003 4.738e-003
4.676e-003 2.660e-002 6.549e-003
3 4.617e-003 4.402e-003 3.030e-003 3.011e-003
3.189e-003 1.454e-002 4.366e-003
4 3.264e-003 3.277e-003 2.578e-003 2.175e-003
2.178e-003 8.953e-003 3.274e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 2.033e-002 1.863e-002 1.603e-002 1.758e-002
1.735e-002 3.745e-002 2.672e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 62 of 93
0.05 2.704e-002 2.161e-002 1.929e-002 2.527e-002
2.325e-002 5.029e-002 4.130e-002
0.1 3.349e-002 2.691e-002 2.579e-002 2.680e-002
2.844e-002 6.924e-002 4.981e-002
0.2 4.248e-002 3.359e-002 3.529e-002 2.670e-002
2.985e-002 9.802e-002 7.597e-002
0.3 4.380e-002 3.610e-002 3.496e-002 3.047e-002
2.832e-002 1.066e-001 7.169e-002
0.4 4.173e-002 3.896e-002 3.141e-002 2.893e-002
2.617e-002 1.030e-001 6.337e-002
0.5 3.863e-002 3.864e-002 2.767e-002 2.747e-002
2.419e-002 9.688e-002 5.346e-002
0.75 3.133e-002 3.012e-002 2.101e-002 2.494e-002
1.980e-002 8.454e-002 3.704e-002
1 2.504e-002 2.283e-002 1.600e-002 1.797e-002
1.612e-002 7.703e-002 2.753e-002
2 1.438e-002 1.272e-002 8.178e-003 9.609e-003
9.355e-003 5.027e-002 1.382e-002
3 9.372e-003 9.136e-003 6.420e-003 6.117e-003
6.342e-003 2.848e-002 9.210e-003
4 6.629e-003 6.742e-003 5.400e-003 4.291e-003
4.314e-003 1.789e-002 6.908e-003
Source: Ryan Creek Fault Zone
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 174.66 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 7.00 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.000e-002 8.202e-003 7.111e-003 8.280e-003
8.169e-003 2.167e-002 1.481e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 63 of 93
0.05 1.277e-002 9.376e-003 7.955e-003 1.118e-002
1.048e-002 2.905e-002 2.069e-002
0.1 1.534e-002 1.135e-002 1.027e-002 1.134e-002
1.236e-002 3.882e-002 2.390e-002
0.2 2.011e-002 1.403e-002 1.534e-002 1.205e-002
1.277e-002 5.277e-002 3.995e-002
0.3 2.074e-002 1.508e-002 1.568e-002 1.391e-002
1.212e-002 5.666e-002 3.717e-002
0.4 1.959e-002 1.635e-002 1.413e-002 1.321e-002
1.122e-002 5.407e-002 3.199e-002
0.5 1.784e-002 1.617e-002 1.226e-002 1.240e-002
1.038e-002 4.977e-002 2.624e-002
0.75 1.411e-002 1.240e-002 9.074e-003 1.082e-002
8.501e-003 4.225e-002 1.726e-002
1 1.112e-002 9.238e-003 6.852e-003 7.766e-003
6.929e-003 3.727e-002 1.236e-002
2 6.202e-003 5.042e-003 3.422e-003 4.120e-003
4.025e-003 2.310e-002 5.705e-003
3 3.939e-003 3.624e-003 2.591e-003 2.585e-003
2.738e-003 1.251e-002 3.804e-003
4 2.762e-003 2.686e-003 2.170e-003 1.849e-003
1.854e-003 7.650e-003 2.853e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.737e-002 1.538e-002 1.354e-002 1.486e-002
1.437e-002 3.323e-002 2.417e-002
0.05 2.308e-002 1.773e-002 1.611e-002 2.118e-002
1.901e-002 4.499e-002 3.778e-002
0.1 2.858e-002 2.183e-002 2.170e-002 2.253e-002
2.297e-002 6.195e-002 4.579e-002
0.2 3.675e-002 2.732e-002 3.055e-002 2.294e-002
2.429e-002 8.676e-002 7.050e-002
0.3 3.800e-002 2.973e-002 3.071e-002 2.634e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 64 of 93
2.338e-002 9.409e-002 6.558e-002
0.4 3.624e-002 3.251e-002 2.775e-002 2.519e-002
2.184e-002 9.068e-002 5.710e-002
0.5 3.353e-002 3.242e-002 2.448e-002 2.403e-002
2.035e-002 8.515e-002 4.759e-002
0.75 2.716e-002 2.519e-002 1.866e-002 2.197e-002
1.683e-002 7.403e-002 3.232e-002
1 2.169e-002 1.901e-002 1.423e-002 1.590e-002
1.378e-002 6.729e-002 2.380e-002
2 1.240e-002 1.056e-002 7.173e-003 8.357e-003
8.052e-003 4.365e-002 1.204e-002
3 8.004e-003 7.523e-003 5.538e-003 5.251e-003
5.444e-003 2.450e-002 8.024e-003
4 5.614e-003 5.526e-003 4.574e-003 3.648e-003
3.671e-003 1.528e-002 6.018e-003
Source: Salt and Cache Valley Faults (Class B)
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 146.92 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 7.20 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.546e-002 1.387e-002 1.169e-002 1.344e-002
1.348e-002 2.988e-002 1.976e-002
0.05 2.000e-002 1.621e-002 1.361e-002 1.877e-002
1.809e-002 3.942e-002 2.723e-002
0.1 2.426e-002 2.046e-002 1.739e-002 1.926e-002
2.221e-002 5.269e-002 3.126e-002
0.2 3.047e-002 2.487e-002 2.405e-002 1.926e-002
2.248e-002 7.293e-002 5.045e-002
0.3 3.076e-002 2.536e-002 2.338e-002 2.140e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 65 of 93
2.042e-002 7.821e-002 4.823e-002
0.4 2.868e-002 2.609e-002 2.055e-002 1.973e-002
1.826e-002 7.468e-002 4.284e-002
0.5 2.596e-002 2.516e-002 1.762e-002 1.811e-002
1.648e-002 6.876e-002 3.607e-002
0.75 2.039e-002 1.925e-002 1.278e-002 1.530e-002
1.300e-002 5.845e-002 2.477e-002
1 1.601e-002 1.446e-002 9.578e-003 1.079e-002
1.036e-002 5.160e-002 1.811e-002
2 8.912e-003 7.885e-003 4.883e-003 5.894e-003
5.786e-003 3.203e-002 8.195e-003
3 5.768e-003 5.732e-003 3.836e-003 3.801e-003
3.908e-003 1.767e-002 5.464e-003
4 4.113e-003 4.268e-003 3.313e-003 2.780e-003
2.681e-003 1.094e-002 4.098e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 2.696e-002 2.601e-002 2.191e-002 2.412e-002
2.371e-002 4.582e-002 3.226e-002
0.05 3.635e-002 3.066e-002 2.733e-002 3.554e-002
3.282e-002 6.106e-002 4.972e-002
0.1 4.545e-002 3.934e-002 3.639e-002 3.825e-002
4.126e-002 8.408e-002 5.990e-002
0.2 5.586e-002 4.843e-002 4.697e-002 3.665e-002
4.276e-002 1.199e-001 8.902e-002
0.3 5.643e-002 5.000e-002 4.475e-002 4.054e-002
3.936e-002 1.299e-001 8.510e-002
0.4 5.308e-002 5.187e-002 3.949e-002 3.763e-002
3.554e-002 1.253e-001 7.647e-002
0.5 4.878e-002 5.046e-002 3.451e-002 3.510e-002
3.228e-002 1.176e-001 6.541e-002
0.75 3.922e-002 3.909e-002 2.583e-002 3.106e-002
2.573e-002 1.024e-001 4.639e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 66 of 93
1 3.120e-002 2.975e-002 1.953e-002 2.209e-002
2.060e-002 9.315e-002 3.486e-002
2 1.778e-002 1.651e-002 9.966e-003 1.196e-002
1.158e-002 6.053e-002 1.729e-002
3 1.168e-002 1.190e-002 7.928e-003 7.722e-003
7.770e-003 3.460e-002 1.153e-002
4 8.329e-003 8.782e-003 6.814e-003 5.484e-003
5.310e-003 2.187e-002 8.644e-003
Source: Sevier Fault
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 139.52 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 7.00 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.415e-002 1.242e-002 1.086e-002 1.268e-002
1.175e-002 2.738e-002 1.867e-002
0.05 1.863e-002 1.460e-002 1.288e-002 1.790e-002
1.595e-002 3.671e-002 2.689e-002
0.1 2.288e-002 1.864e-002 1.680e-002 1.902e-002
1.967e-002 4.906e-002 3.146e-002
0.2 2.863e-002 2.232e-002 2.335e-002 1.924e-002
1.996e-002 6.623e-002 5.031e-002
0.3 2.831e-002 2.220e-002 2.239e-002 2.072e-002
1.803e-002 6.986e-002 4.654e-002
0.4 2.595e-002 2.236e-002 1.944e-002 1.886e-002
1.606e-002 6.596e-002 4.010e-002
0.5 2.317e-002 2.127e-002 1.651e-002 1.704e-002
1.443e-002 6.022e-002 3.299e-002
0.75 1.785e-002 1.592e-002 1.183e-002 1.410e-002
1.127e-002 5.037e-002 2.184e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 67 of 93
1 1.385e-002 1.186e-002 8.784e-003 9.871e-003
8.916e-003 4.397e-002 1.570e-002
2 7.493e-003 6.337e-003 4.243e-003 5.154e-003
4.851e-003 2.657e-002 7.190e-003
3 4.752e-003 4.511e-003 3.211e-003 3.246e-003
3.201e-003 1.439e-002 4.793e-003
4 3.334e-003 3.305e-003 2.686e-003 2.334e-003
2.150e-003 8.798e-003 3.595e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 2.464e-002 2.329e-002 2.026e-002 2.275e-002
2.067e-002 4.199e-002 3.048e-002
0.05 3.384e-002 2.761e-002 2.580e-002 3.390e-002
2.894e-002 5.685e-002 4.910e-002
0.1 4.290e-002 3.583e-002 3.506e-002 3.778e-002
3.654e-002 7.828e-002 6.029e-002
0.2 5.245e-002 4.345e-002 4.539e-002 3.663e-002
3.797e-002 1.089e-001 8.878e-002
0.3 5.189e-002 4.377e-002 4.258e-002 3.925e-002
3.477e-002 1.160e-001 8.211e-002
0.4 4.798e-002 4.445e-002 3.714e-002 3.597e-002
3.125e-002 1.106e-001 7.157e-002
0.5 4.351e-002 4.266e-002 3.217e-002 3.301e-002
2.826e-002 1.030e-001 5.983e-002
0.75 3.433e-002 3.233e-002 2.379e-002 2.863e-002
2.231e-002 8.826e-002 4.090e-002
1 2.699e-002 2.440e-002 1.782e-002 2.021e-002
1.773e-002 7.938e-002 3.022e-002
2 1.494e-002 1.327e-002 8.599e-003 1.045e-002
9.706e-003 5.020e-002 1.517e-002
3 9.609e-003 9.364e-003 6.578e-003 6.593e-003
6.366e-003 2.818e-002 1.011e-002
4 6.747e-003 6.800e-003 5.489e-003 4.606e-003
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 68 of 93
4.257e-003 1.758e-002 7.584e-003
Source: Sevier Toroweap Fault Zone - Northern Toroweap Section
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 181.79 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 7.40 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.311e-002 1.157e-002 9.050e-003 1.059e-002
1.165e-002 2.795e-002 1.747e-002
0.05 1.624e-002 1.315e-002 9.838e-003 1.412e-002
1.479e-002 3.639e-002 2.221e-002
0.1 1.910e-002 1.575e-002 1.220e-002 1.347e-002
1.747e-002 4.864e-002 2.463e-002
0.2 2.494e-002 1.990e-002 1.778e-002 1.380e-002
1.787e-002 6.913e-002 4.158e-002
0.3 2.661e-002 2.207e-002 1.850e-002 1.669e-002
1.695e-002 7.621e-002 4.142e-002
0.4 2.587e-002 2.454e-002 1.699e-002 1.611e-002
1.569e-002 7.406e-002 3.803e-002
0.5 2.413e-002 2.471e-002 1.498e-002 1.548e-002
1.454e-002 6.911e-002 3.277e-002
0.75 1.973e-002 1.965e-002 1.130e-002 1.390e-002
1.202e-002 6.023e-002 2.331e-002
1 1.584e-002 1.487e-002 8.663e-003 1.007e-002
9.886e-003 5.412e-002 1.731e-002
2 9.273e-003 8.392e-003 4.794e-003 5.818e-003
5.961e-003 3.505e-002 7.750e-003
3 6.125e-003 6.263e-003 3.910e-003 3.828e-003
4.223e-003 1.963e-002 5.167e-003
4 4.432e-003 4.775e-003 3.491e-003 2.832e-003
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 69 of 93
2.976e-003 1.230e-002 3.875e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 2.284e-002 2.170e-002 1.730e-002 1.900e-002
2.049e-002 4.287e-002 2.851e-002
0.05 2.938e-002 2.486e-002 1.997e-002 2.675e-002
2.684e-002 5.637e-002 4.055e-002
0.1 3.554e-002 3.028e-002 2.583e-002 2.675e-002
3.245e-002 7.762e-002 4.719e-002
0.2 4.562e-002 3.874e-002 3.559e-002 2.626e-002
3.400e-002 1.137e-001 7.337e-002
0.3 4.882e-002 4.350e-002 3.647e-002 3.162e-002
3.268e-002 1.265e-001 7.309e-002
0.4 4.793e-002 4.879e-002 3.355e-002 3.071e-002
3.053e-002 1.242e-001 6.787e-002
0.5 4.538e-002 4.956e-002 3.004e-002 2.999e-002
2.848e-002 1.182e-001 5.943e-002
0.75 3.797e-002 3.992e-002 2.334e-002 2.821e-002
2.379e-002 1.055e-001 4.366e-002
1 3.089e-002 3.060e-002 1.808e-002 2.060e-002
1.966e-002 9.769e-002 3.331e-002
2 1.854e-002 1.757e-002 1.012e-002 1.180e-002
1.193e-002 6.623e-002 1.635e-002
3 1.246e-002 1.300e-002 8.429e-003 7.777e-003
8.398e-003 3.845e-002 1.090e-002
4 9.016e-003 9.824e-003 7.406e-003 5.586e-003
5.893e-003 2.457e-002 8.174e-003
Source: Sevier Toroweap Fault Zone - Sevier Section
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 144.57 km
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 70 of 93
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 7.40 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.856e-002 1.739e-002 1.396e-002 1.610e-002
1.679e-002 3.494e-002 2.221e-002
0.05 2.379e-002 2.037e-002 1.616e-002 2.252e-002
2.259e-002 4.549e-002 2.914e-002
0.1 2.868e-002 2.580e-002 2.029e-002 2.261e-002
2.791e-002 6.079e-002 3.276e-002
0.2 3.569e-002 3.152e-002 2.743e-002 2.205e-002
2.813e-002 8.582e-002 5.282e-002
0.3 3.633e-002 3.220e-002 2.666e-002 2.480e-002
2.540e-002 9.289e-002 5.230e-002
0.4 3.417e-002 3.312e-002 2.351e-002 2.288e-002
2.262e-002 8.931e-002 4.807e-002
0.5 3.117e-002 3.202e-002 2.026e-002 2.112e-002
2.036e-002 8.265e-002 4.154e-002
0.75 2.478e-002 2.481e-002 1.477e-002 1.794e-002
1.603e-002 7.095e-002 2.976e-002
1 1.959e-002 1.877e-002 1.112e-002 1.267e-002
1.278e-002 6.306e-002 2.217e-002
2 1.110e-002 1.036e-002 5.939e-003 7.205e-003
7.175e-003 3.980e-002 9.851e-003
3 7.320e-003 7.651e-003 4.841e-003 4.764e-003
4.913e-003 2.229e-002 6.567e-003
4 5.300e-003 5.761e-003 4.316e-003 3.548e-003
3.429e-003 1.396e-002 4.925e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 71 of 93
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 3.242e-002 3.262e-002 2.612e-002 2.890e-002
2.952e-002 5.358e-002 3.626e-002
0.05 4.328e-002 3.852e-002 3.244e-002 4.263e-002
4.099e-002 7.046e-002 5.321e-002
0.1 5.374e-002 4.961e-002 4.243e-002 4.491e-002
5.185e-002 9.702e-002 6.277e-002
0.2 6.550e-002 6.137e-002 5.353e-002 4.197e-002
5.351e-002 1.411e-001 9.320e-002
0.3 6.673e-002 6.349e-002 5.095e-002 4.697e-002
4.896e-002 1.542e-001 9.228e-002
0.4 6.329e-002 6.586e-002 4.513e-002 4.364e-002
4.402e-002 1.498e-001 8.579e-002
0.5 5.860e-002 6.421e-002 3.962e-002 4.092e-002
3.988e-002 1.414e-001 7.535e-002
0.75 4.767e-002 5.039e-002 2.980e-002 3.642e-002
3.173e-002 1.243e-001 5.572e-002
1 3.818e-002 3.863e-002 2.265e-002 2.593e-002
2.540e-002 1.138e-001 4.268e-002
2 2.215e-002 2.169e-002 1.210e-002 1.461e-002
1.435e-002 7.520e-002 2.078e-002
3 1.481e-002 1.588e-002 9.986e-003 9.677e-003
9.769e-003 4.366e-002 1.385e-002
4 1.073e-002 1.185e-002 8.864e-003 7.000e-003
6.790e-003 2.790e-002 1.039e-002
Source: Sevier Valley Faults and Fold (Class B)
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 145.95 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 6.70 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 72 of 93
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.031e-002 8.348e-003 7.900e-003 9.291e-003
7.834e-003 2.116e-002 1.520e-002
0.05 1.370e-002 9.765e-003 9.372e-003 1.304e-002
1.050e-002 2.916e-002 2.250e-002
0.1 1.694e-002 1.234e-002 1.255e-002 1.426e-002
1.275e-002 3.897e-002 2.663e-002
0.2 2.157e-002 1.465e-002 1.818e-002 1.505e-002
1.315e-002 5.055e-002 4.310e-002
0.3 2.112e-002 1.456e-002 1.758e-002 1.602e-002
1.211e-002 5.234e-002 3.832e-002
0.4 1.915e-002 1.472e-002 1.525e-002 1.461e-002
1.093e-002 4.876e-002 3.172e-002
0.5 1.692e-002 1.396e-002 1.290e-002 1.313e-002
9.915e-003 4.408e-002 2.528e-002
0.75 1.281e-002 1.019e-002 9.209e-003 1.083e-002
7.804e-003 3.616e-002 1.589e-002
1 9.835e-003 7.478e-003 6.794e-003 7.584e-003
6.180e-003 3.114e-002 1.114e-002
2 5.138e-003 3.902e-003 3.074e-003 3.731e-003
3.292e-003 1.821e-002 5.174e-003
3 3.140e-003 2.633e-003 2.201e-003 2.263e-003
2.105e-003 9.549e-003 3.449e-003
4 2.135e-003 1.828e-003 1.756e-003 1.583e-003
1.363e-003 5.708e-003 2.587e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 73 of 93
7 8
PGA 1.807e-002 1.581e-002 1.480e-002 1.667e-002
1.378e-002 3.378e-002 2.482e-002
0.05 2.505e-002 1.864e-002 1.882e-002 2.470e-002
1.906e-002 4.702e-002 4.107e-002
0.1 3.202e-002 2.395e-002 2.625e-002 2.833e-002
2.369e-002 6.474e-002 5.102e-002
0.2 3.985e-002 2.877e-002 3.552e-002 2.864e-002
2.501e-002 8.653e-002 7.605e-002
0.3 3.907e-002 2.896e-002 3.364e-002 3.034e-002
2.335e-002 9.049e-002 6.761e-002
0.4 3.577e-002 2.952e-002 2.930e-002 2.786e-002
2.128e-002 8.514e-002 5.662e-002
0.5 3.210e-002 2.824e-002 2.525e-002 2.544e-002
1.943e-002 7.839e-002 4.585e-002
0.75 2.493e-002 2.087e-002 1.860e-002 2.199e-002
1.545e-002 6.572e-002 2.975e-002
1 1.940e-002 1.551e-002 1.385e-002 1.552e-002
1.229e-002 5.823e-002 2.144e-002
2 1.037e-002 8.236e-003 6.273e-003 7.567e-003
6.586e-003 3.551e-002 1.091e-002
3 6.420e-003 5.509e-003 4.547e-003 4.596e-003
4.186e-003 1.925e-002 7.276e-003
4 4.363e-003 3.792e-003 3.611e-003 3.122e-003
2.699e-003 1.172e-002 5.457e-003
Source: Sevier Valley-Marysvale-Circleville Area Faults
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 150.49 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 6.90 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 74 of 93
7 8
PGA 1.162e-002 9.818e-003 8.735e-003 1.022e-002
9.362e-003 2.358e-002 1.636e-002
0.05 1.523e-002 1.144e-002 1.021e-002 1.423e-002
1.248e-002 3.188e-002 2.365e-002
0.1 1.863e-002 1.437e-002 1.340e-002 1.509e-002
1.514e-002 4.260e-002 2.772e-002
0.2 2.374e-002 1.729e-002 1.923e-002 1.568e-002
1.550e-002 5.691e-002 4.504e-002
0.3 2.365e-002 1.754e-002 1.879e-002 1.712e-002
1.427e-002 5.997e-002 4.114e-002
0.4 2.178e-002 1.802e-002 1.646e-002 1.576e-002
1.289e-002 5.655e-002 3.494e-002
0.5 1.948e-002 1.730e-002 1.404e-002 1.435e-002
1.170e-002 5.159e-002 2.840e-002
0.75 1.502e-002 1.292e-002 1.013e-002 1.203e-002
9.272e-003 4.306e-002 1.843e-002
1 1.166e-002 9.584e-003 7.535e-003 8.472e-003
7.397e-003 3.754e-002 1.312e-002
2 6.292e-003 5.111e-003 3.591e-003 4.354e-003
4.072e-003 2.261e-002 6.057e-003
3 3.949e-003 3.611e-003 2.668e-003 2.705e-003
2.684e-003 1.212e-002 4.038e-003
4 2.744e-003 2.617e-003 2.198e-003 1.925e-003
1.786e-003 7.359e-003 3.028e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 2.027e-002 1.847e-002 1.641e-002 1.833e-002
1.646e-002 3.665e-002 2.671e-002
0.05 2.769e-002 2.170e-002 2.053e-002 2.696e-002
2.264e-002 5.004e-002 4.319e-002
0.1 3.498e-002 2.770e-002 2.807e-002 2.997e-002
2.812e-002 6.891e-002 5.312e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 75 of 93
0.2 4.359e-002 3.376e-002 3.769e-002 2.984e-002
2.949e-002 9.483e-002 7.947e-002
0.3 4.350e-002 3.468e-002 3.610e-002 3.243e-002
2.751e-002 1.009e-001 7.259e-002
0.4 4.041e-002 3.593e-002 3.175e-002 3.006e-002
2.508e-002 9.613e-002 6.236e-002
0.5 3.671e-002 3.479e-002 2.758e-002 2.781e-002
2.292e-002 8.941e-002 5.150e-002
0.75 2.901e-002 2.632e-002 2.052e-002 2.442e-002
1.835e-002 7.638e-002 3.451e-002
1 2.283e-002 1.977e-002 1.541e-002 1.734e-002
1.471e-002 6.857e-002 2.526e-002
2 1.261e-002 1.073e-002 7.362e-003 8.831e-003
8.147e-003 4.317e-002 1.278e-002
3 8.027e-003 7.515e-003 5.546e-003 5.495e-003
5.338e-003 2.397e-002 8.518e-003
4 5.577e-003 5.400e-003 4.539e-003 3.797e-003
3.537e-003 1.484e-002 6.389e-003
Source: Shay Graben Fault (Class B)
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 88.02 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 7.00 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 2.679e-002 2.507e-002 2.254e-002 2.721e-002
2.175e-002 4.422e-002 3.055e-002
0.05 3.728e-002 3.072e-002 2.917e-002 4.143e-002
3.200e-002 5.928e-002 4.686e-002
0.1 4.767e-002 4.236e-002 3.858e-002 4.746e-002
4.217e-002 7.922e-002 5.634e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 76 of 93
0.2 5.540e-002 4.843e-002 4.851e-002 4.455e-002
4.176e-002 1.055e-001 8.205e-002
0.3 5.090e-002 4.301e-002 4.258e-002 4.261e-002
3.519e-002 1.073e-001 7.498e-002
0.4 4.442e-002 3.888e-002 3.515e-002 3.641e-002
2.969e-002 9.914e-002 6.479e-002
0.5 3.839e-002 3.495e-002 2.905e-002 3.104e-002
2.559e-002 8.902e-002 5.363e-002
0.75 2.832e-002 2.523e-002 1.997e-002 2.360e-002
1.869e-002 7.223e-002 3.600e-002
1 2.147e-002 1.879e-002 1.452e-002 1.600e-002
1.416e-002 6.171e-002 2.608e-002
2 1.103e-002 9.738e-003 6.698e-003 8.174e-003
6.977e-003 3.539e-002 1.175e-002
3 6.996e-003 6.851e-003 5.066e-003 5.180e-003
4.384e-003 1.916e-002 7.834e-003
4 4.928e-003 4.954e-003 4.223e-003 3.765e-003
2.903e-003 1.172e-002 5.875e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 4.682e-002 4.703e-002 4.113e-002 4.882e-002
3.826e-002 6.782e-002 4.987e-002
0.05 6.814e-002 5.809e-002 5.744e-002 7.844e-002
5.806e-002 9.181e-002 8.556e-002
0.1 8.993e-002 8.144e-002 7.845e-002 9.424e-002
7.832e-002 1.264e-001 1.080e-001
0.2 1.015e-001 9.428e-002 8.998e-002 8.479e-002
7.943e-002 1.735e-001 1.448e-001
0.3 9.327e-002 8.479e-002 7.778e-002 8.072e-002
6.784e-002 1.781e-001 1.323e-001
0.4 8.207e-002 7.730e-002 6.490e-002 6.943e-002
5.777e-002 1.663e-001 1.156e-001
0.5 7.200e-002 7.008e-002 5.486e-002 6.014e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 77 of 93
5.014e-002 1.523e-001 9.727e-002
0.75 5.445e-002 5.124e-002 3.914e-002 4.791e-002
3.699e-002 1.266e-001 6.742e-002
1 4.186e-002 3.867e-002 2.890e-002 3.276e-002
2.815e-002 1.114e-001 5.020e-002
2 2.204e-002 2.039e-002 1.344e-002 1.658e-002
1.396e-002 6.687e-002 2.479e-002
3 1.415e-002 1.422e-002 1.024e-002 1.052e-002
8.718e-003 3.753e-002 1.653e-002
4 9.962e-003 1.019e-002 8.538e-003 7.427e-003
5.748e-003 2.342e-002 1.239e-002
Source: Ten Mile Graben Faults (Class B)
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 131.29 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 6.90 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.433e-002 1.249e-002 1.131e-002 1.312e-002
1.163e-002 2.724e-002 1.901e-002
0.05 1.912e-002 1.478e-002 1.367e-002 1.875e-002
1.599e-002 3.683e-002 2.802e-002
0.1 2.372e-002 1.909e-002 1.804e-002 2.040e-002
1.990e-002 4.923e-002 3.312e-002
0.2 2.942e-002 2.259e-002 2.485e-002 2.062e-002
2.016e-002 6.549e-002 5.229e-002
0.3 2.860e-002 2.196e-002 2.342e-002 2.164e-002
1.804e-002 6.827e-002 4.758e-002
0.4 2.587e-002 2.168e-002 2.008e-002 1.946e-002
1.594e-002 6.396e-002 4.044e-002
0.5 2.288e-002 2.037e-002 1.693e-002 1.735e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 78 of 93
1.423e-002 5.806e-002 3.293e-002
0.75 1.737e-002 1.502e-002 1.199e-002 1.412e-002
1.098e-002 4.803e-002 2.146e-002
1 1.337e-002 1.114e-002 8.838e-003 9.811e-003
8.616e-003 4.160e-002 1.532e-002
2 7.084e-003 5.871e-003 4.133e-003 4.999e-003
4.568e-003 2.467e-002 7.035e-003
3 4.444e-003 4.127e-003 3.070e-003 3.112e-003
2.954e-003 1.323e-002 4.690e-003
4 3.090e-003 2.974e-003 2.527e-003 2.222e-003
1.955e-003 8.030e-003 3.518e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 2.503e-002 2.349e-002 2.097e-002 2.355e-002
2.045e-002 4.234e-002 3.103e-002
0.05 3.487e-002 2.803e-002 2.730e-002 3.550e-002
2.902e-002 5.782e-002 5.117e-002
0.1 4.467e-002 3.682e-002 3.751e-002 4.051e-002
3.696e-002 7.962e-002 6.346e-002
0.2 5.407e-002 4.411e-002 4.795e-002 3.924e-002
3.835e-002 1.091e-001 9.226e-002
0.3 5.255e-002 4.343e-002 4.414e-002 4.100e-002
3.478e-002 1.149e-001 8.396e-002
0.4 4.797e-002 4.322e-002 3.805e-002 3.712e-002
3.102e-002 1.087e-001 7.218e-002
0.5 4.308e-002 4.097e-002 3.273e-002 3.362e-002
2.789e-002 1.006e-001 5.973e-002
0.75 3.353e-002 3.059e-002 2.395e-002 2.866e-002
2.174e-002 8.519e-002 4.019e-002
1 2.615e-002 2.298e-002 1.781e-002 2.008e-002
1.713e-002 7.599e-002 2.949e-002
2 1.417e-002 1.232e-002 8.292e-003 1.014e-002
9.138e-003 4.711e-002 1.484e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 79 of 93
3 9.004e-003 8.588e-003 6.210e-003 6.322e-003
5.875e-003 2.615e-002 9.894e-003
4 6.262e-003 6.136e-003 5.115e-003 4.383e-003
3.871e-003 1.619e-002 7.421e-003
Source: Thousand Lake Fault
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 90.90 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 7.10 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 2.751e-002 2.619e-002 2.283e-002 2.750e-002
2.283e-002 4.551e-002 3.084e-002
0.05 3.794e-002 3.201e-002 2.926e-002 4.164e-002
3.340e-002 6.052e-002 4.623e-002
0.1 4.822e-002 4.395e-002 3.834e-002 4.696e-002
4.391e-002 8.088e-002 5.504e-002
0.2 5.621e-002 5.059e-002 4.813e-002 4.386e-002
4.351e-002 1.091e-001 8.079e-002
0.3 5.218e-002 4.542e-002 4.255e-002 4.261e-002
3.679e-002 1.120e-001 7.506e-002
0.4 4.590e-002 4.142e-002 3.534e-002 3.662e-002
3.114e-002 1.041e-001 6.581e-002
0.5 3.993e-002 3.746e-002 2.935e-002 3.145e-002
2.691e-002 9.390e-002 5.508e-002
0.75 2.975e-002 2.733e-002 2.030e-002 2.413e-002
1.977e-002 7.686e-002 3.762e-002
1 2.270e-002 2.045e-002 1.482e-002 1.643e-002
1.504e-002 6.606e-002 2.747e-002
2 1.185e-002 1.070e-002 7.027e-003 8.595e-003
7.520e-003 3.844e-002 1.232e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 80 of 93
3 7.591e-003 7.609e-003 5.414e-003 5.522e-003
4.795e-003 2.102e-002 8.213e-003
4 5.389e-003 5.544e-003 4.586e-003 4.052e-003
3.215e-003 1.294e-002 6.159e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 4.807e-002 4.912e-002 4.167e-002 4.935e-002
4.016e-002 6.980e-002 5.033e-002
0.05 6.933e-002 6.054e-002 5.763e-002 7.883e-002
6.060e-002 9.373e-002 8.441e-002
0.1 9.094e-002 8.450e-002 7.814e-002 9.326e-002
8.155e-002 1.291e-001 1.055e-001
0.2 1.030e-001 9.850e-002 8.927e-002 8.348e-002
8.276e-002 1.794e-001 1.426e-001
0.3 9.562e-002 8.954e-002 7.773e-002 8.070e-002
7.094e-002 1.859e-001 1.324e-001
0.4 8.482e-002 8.236e-002 6.527e-002 6.983e-002
6.060e-002 1.746e-001 1.175e-001
0.5 7.490e-002 7.513e-002 5.543e-002 6.093e-002
5.273e-002 1.606e-001 9.990e-002
0.75 5.720e-002 5.552e-002 3.978e-002 4.899e-002
3.913e-002 1.347e-001 7.046e-002
1 4.424e-002 4.208e-002 2.951e-002 3.364e-002
2.990e-002 1.193e-001 5.288e-002
2 2.366e-002 2.241e-002 1.410e-002 1.743e-002
1.504e-002 7.265e-002 2.599e-002
3 1.535e-002 1.579e-002 1.095e-002 1.122e-002
9.535e-003 4.116e-002 1.732e-002
4 1.089e-002 1.141e-002 9.273e-003 7.994e-003
6.366e-003 2.585e-002 1.299e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 81 of 93
Source: Tushar Mountains (East Side) Fault
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 148.37 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 6.50 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 8.441e-003 6.203e-003 6.535e-003 7.723e-003
5.997e-003 1.804e-002 1.345e-002
0.05 1.131e-002 7.241e-003 7.779e-003 1.083e-002
7.987e-003 2.540e-002 1.998e-002
0.1 1.405e-002 9.121e-003 1.060e-002 1.210e-002
9.613e-003 3.395e-002 2.369e-002
0.2 1.806e-002 1.072e-002 1.575e-002 1.310e-002
1.006e-002 4.268e-002 3.862e-002
0.3 1.751e-002 1.059e-002 1.526e-002 1.378e-002
9.384e-003 4.351e-002 3.358e-002
0.4 1.573e-002 1.068e-002 1.320e-002 1.256e-002
8.551e-003 4.008e-002 2.719e-002
0.5 1.377e-002 1.008e-002 1.112e-002 1.123e-002
7.798e-003 3.594e-002 2.128e-002
0.75 1.029e-002 7.204e-003 7.909e-003 9.213e-003
6.147e-003 2.901e-002 1.298e-002
1 7.833e-003 5.228e-003 5.807e-003 6.445e-003
4.851e-003 2.470e-002 8.965e-003
2 3.971e-003 2.675e-003 2.510e-003 3.045e-003
2.504e-003 1.406e-002 4.179e-003
3 2.367e-003 1.760e-003 1.732e-003 1.801e-003
1.552e-003 7.192e-003 2.786e-003
4 1.582e-003 1.199e-003 1.339e-003 1.237e-003
9.766e-004 4.225e-003 2.089e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 82 of 93
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.485e-002 1.182e-002 1.226e-002 1.386e-002
1.055e-002 2.959e-002 2.195e-002
0.05 2.076e-002 1.391e-002 1.563e-002 2.050e-002
1.449e-002 4.208e-002 3.648e-002
0.1 2.671e-002 1.781e-002 2.220e-002 2.403e-002
1.786e-002 5.794e-002 4.539e-002
0.2 3.353e-002 2.119e-002 3.081e-002 2.494e-002
1.913e-002 7.505e-002 6.815e-002
0.3 3.259e-002 2.120e-002 2.926e-002 2.610e-002
1.809e-002 7.728e-002 5.926e-002
0.4 2.955e-002 2.155e-002 2.542e-002 2.395e-002
1.664e-002 7.189e-002 4.852e-002
0.5 2.629e-002 2.052e-002 2.181e-002 2.176e-002
1.528e-002 6.559e-002 3.859e-002
0.75 2.018e-002 1.484e-002 1.600e-002 1.870e-002
1.217e-002 5.403e-002 2.431e-002
1 1.558e-002 1.091e-002 1.186e-002 1.319e-002
9.646e-003 4.728e-002 1.726e-002
2 8.080e-003 5.676e-003 5.136e-003 6.176e-003
5.010e-003 2.799e-002 8.815e-003
3 4.874e-003 3.703e-003 3.590e-003 3.659e-003
3.087e-003 1.478e-002 5.877e-003
4 3.252e-003 2.503e-003 2.759e-003 2.441e-003
1.934e-003 8.836e-003 4.407e-003
Source: Unnamed Faults East of Atkinson Mesa
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 189.62 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 7.00 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 83 of 93
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 8.733e-003 6.941e-003 5.967e-003 7.004e-003
7.019e-003 1.989e-002 1.358e-002
0.05 1.103e-002 7.841e-003 6.507e-003 9.292e-003
8.785e-003 2.667e-002 1.876e-002
0.1 1.313e-002 9.283e-003 8.363e-003 9.245e-003
1.017e-002 3.564e-002 2.156e-002
0.2 1.755e-002 1.163e-002 1.290e-002 1.003e-002
1.059e-002 4.856e-002 3.665e-002
0.3 1.839e-002 1.291e-002 1.356e-002 1.190e-002
1.028e-002 5.248e-002 3.417e-002
0.4 1.758e-002 1.445e-002 1.243e-002 1.151e-002
9.674e-003 5.027e-002 2.939e-002
0.5 1.614e-002 1.453e-002 1.090e-002 1.098e-002
9.070e-003 4.642e-002 2.408e-002
0.75 1.290e-002 1.126e-002 8.183e-003 9.789e-003
7.578e-003 3.962e-002 1.580e-002
1 1.023e-002 8.387e-003 6.227e-003 7.105e-003
6.257e-003 3.509e-002 1.131e-002
2 5.780e-003 4.619e-003 3.157e-003 3.797e-003
3.739e-003 2.195e-002 5.232e-003
3 3.674e-003 3.335e-003 2.391e-003 2.379e-003
2.578e-003 1.188e-002 3.488e-003
4 2.576e-003 2.484e-003 2.003e-003 1.698e-003
1.752e-003 7.268e-003 2.616e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 84 of 93
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.514e-002 1.302e-002 1.145e-002 1.257e-002
1.234e-002 3.051e-002 2.216e-002
0.05 1.987e-002 1.483e-002 1.323e-002 1.760e-002
1.594e-002 4.130e-002 3.425e-002
0.1 2.439e-002 1.785e-002 1.775e-002 1.836e-002
1.890e-002 5.687e-002 4.131e-002
0.2 3.201e-002 2.264e-002 2.592e-002 1.909e-002
2.015e-002 7.983e-002 6.466e-002
0.3 3.368e-002 2.546e-002 2.687e-002 2.253e-002
1.982e-002 8.715e-002 6.028e-002
0.4 3.251e-002 2.873e-002 2.468e-002 2.195e-002
1.883e-002 8.432e-002 5.246e-002
0.5 3.033e-002 2.913e-002 2.196e-002 2.127e-002
1.777e-002 7.941e-002 4.368e-002
0.75 2.484e-002 2.287e-002 1.697e-002 1.987e-002
1.500e-002 6.942e-002 2.959e-002
1 1.997e-002 1.726e-002 1.305e-002 1.454e-002
1.244e-002 6.334e-002 2.176e-002
2 1.156e-002 9.670e-003 6.702e-003 7.700e-003
7.481e-003 4.147e-002 1.104e-002
3 7.478e-003 6.922e-003 5.193e-003 4.832e-003
5.127e-003 2.328e-002 7.358e-003
4 5.245e-003 5.111e-003 4.272e-003 3.349e-003
3.470e-003 1.452e-002 5.518e-003
Source: Valley Mountains Monocline (Class B)
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 174.76 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 7.00 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 85 of 93
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 9.967e-003 8.193e-003 7.049e-003 8.271e-003
8.125e-003 2.166e-002 1.474e-002
0.05 1.273e-002 9.365e-003 7.875e-003 1.117e-002
1.042e-002 2.903e-002 2.059e-002
0.1 1.528e-002 1.134e-002 1.017e-002 1.133e-002
1.229e-002 3.880e-002 2.377e-002
0.2 2.004e-002 1.401e-002 1.521e-002 1.204e-002
1.270e-002 5.274e-002 3.977e-002
0.3 2.068e-002 1.506e-002 1.556e-002 1.389e-002
1.206e-002 5.663e-002 3.701e-002
0.4 1.954e-002 1.634e-002 1.404e-002 1.320e-002
1.117e-002 5.404e-002 3.185e-002
0.5 1.780e-002 1.616e-002 1.219e-002 1.239e-002
1.034e-002 4.974e-002 2.612e-002
0.75 1.408e-002 1.239e-002 9.027e-003 1.081e-002
8.467e-003 4.223e-002 1.718e-002
1 1.110e-002 9.232e-003 6.818e-003 7.761e-003
6.904e-003 3.726e-002 1.231e-002
2 6.193e-003 5.039e-003 3.408e-003 4.118e-003
4.015e-003 2.309e-002 5.680e-003
3 3.933e-003 3.622e-003 2.580e-003 2.584e-003
2.735e-003 1.250e-002 3.787e-003
4 2.758e-003 2.684e-003 2.161e-003 1.848e-003
1.853e-003 7.647e-003 2.840e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.731e-002 1.537e-002 1.343e-002 1.484e-002
1.429e-002 3.321e-002 2.406e-002
0.05 2.300e-002 1.771e-002 1.595e-002 2.115e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 86 of 93
1.890e-002 4.497e-002 3.759e-002
0.1 2.847e-002 2.180e-002 2.148e-002 2.250e-002
2.283e-002 6.191e-002 4.555e-002
0.2 3.662e-002 2.728e-002 3.030e-002 2.292e-002
2.415e-002 8.671e-002 7.018e-002
0.3 3.789e-002 2.970e-002 3.051e-002 2.631e-002
2.325e-002 9.404e-002 6.530e-002
0.4 3.614e-002 3.248e-002 2.759e-002 2.517e-002
2.173e-002 9.063e-002 5.685e-002
0.5 3.345e-002 3.240e-002 2.435e-002 2.401e-002
2.025e-002 8.510e-002 4.738e-002
0.75 2.711e-002 2.517e-002 1.857e-002 2.195e-002
1.676e-002 7.400e-002 3.217e-002
1 2.165e-002 1.900e-002 1.417e-002 1.589e-002
1.373e-002 6.726e-002 2.369e-002
2 1.238e-002 1.055e-002 7.148e-003 8.353e-003
8.033e-003 4.363e-002 1.198e-002
3 7.993e-003 7.518e-003 5.520e-003 5.248e-003
5.439e-003 2.449e-002 7.988e-003
4 5.606e-003 5.523e-003 4.558e-003 3.645e-003
3.669e-003 1.528e-002 5.991e-003
Source: Wah Wah Mountains (South End near Lund) Fault
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 247.13 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 7.00 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 5.491e-003 3.790e-003 3.130e-003 3.880e-003
3.984e-003 1.509e-002 1.024e-002
0.05 6.694e-003 4.089e-003 3.092e-003 4.821e-003
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 87 of 93
4.534e-003 2.023e-002 1.364e-002
0.1 7.785e-003 4.441e-003 3.900e-003 4.466e-003
4.883e-003 2.704e-002 1.543e-002
0.2 1.112e-002 5.859e-003 6.831e-003 5.245e-003
5.249e-003 3.713e-002 2.769e-002
0.3 1.227e-002 7.384e-003 8.048e-003 6.868e-003
5.544e-003 4.099e-002 2.600e-002
0.4 1.220e-002 9.322e-003 7.906e-003 7.125e-003
5.576e-003 3.976e-002 2.234e-002
0.5 1.151e-002 9.984e-003 7.206e-003 7.224e-003
5.499e-003 3.707e-002 1.824e-002
0.75 9.559e-003 8.055e-003 5.746e-003 6.980e-003
4.976e-003 3.220e-002 1.187e-002
1 7.761e-003 6.001e-003 4.517e-003 5.302e-003
4.320e-003 2.887e-002 8.459e-003
2 4.586e-003 3.421e-003 2.432e-003 2.915e-003
2.882e-003 1.861e-002 3.951e-003
3 2.925e-003 2.515e-003 1.842e-003 1.818e-003
2.095e-003 1.008e-002 2.634e-003
4 2.052e-003 1.914e-003 1.544e-003 1.289e-003
1.446e-003 6.163e-003 1.975e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 9.434e-003 7.109e-003 6.159e-003 6.962e-003
7.007e-003 2.315e-002 1.672e-002
0.05 1.192e-002 7.732e-003 6.373e-003 9.130e-003
8.227e-003 3.134e-002 2.491e-002
0.1 1.425e-002 8.539e-003 8.406e-003 8.871e-003
9.071e-003 4.315e-002 2.957e-002
0.2 2.010e-002 1.141e-002 1.415e-002 9.983e-003
9.985e-003 6.105e-002 4.886e-002
0.3 2.235e-002 1.456e-002 1.654e-002 1.301e-002
1.069e-002 6.807e-002 4.588e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 88 of 93
0.4 2.250e-002 1.854e-002 1.623e-002 1.359e-002
1.085e-002 6.669e-002 3.987e-002
0.5 2.160e-002 2.002e-002 1.496e-002 1.400e-002
1.077e-002 6.341e-002 3.308e-002
0.75 1.839e-002 1.636e-002 1.225e-002 1.417e-002
9.851e-003 5.642e-002 2.224e-002
1 1.515e-002 1.235e-002 9.737e-003 1.085e-002
8.590e-003 5.212e-002 1.628e-002
2 9.190e-003 7.162e-003 5.357e-003 5.913e-003
5.767e-003 3.517e-002 8.334e-003
3 5.950e-003 5.219e-003 4.025e-003 3.694e-003
4.167e-003 1.974e-002 5.556e-003
4 4.180e-003 3.938e-003 3.319e-003 2.543e-003
2.863e-003 1.231e-002 4.167e-003
Source: Wasatch Fault Zone - Nephi Section
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 241.64 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 7.00 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 5.718e-003 4.007e-003 3.320e-003 4.093e-003
4.200e-003 1.545e-002 1.049e-002
0.05 6.990e-003 4.342e-003 3.311e-003 5.116e-003
4.823e-003 2.071e-002 1.401e-002
0.1 8.143e-003 4.755e-003 4.184e-003 4.772e-003
5.229e-003 2.768e-002 1.587e-002
0.2 1.156e-002 6.242e-003 7.239e-003 5.561e-003
5.604e-003 3.799e-002 2.835e-002
0.3 1.271e-002 7.772e-003 8.436e-003 7.217e-003
5.872e-003 4.186e-002 2.660e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 89 of 93
0.4 1.259e-002 9.700e-003 8.232e-003 7.437e-003
5.868e-003 4.056e-002 2.286e-002
0.5 1.186e-002 1.033e-002 7.474e-003 7.497e-003
5.759e-003 3.778e-002 1.867e-002
0.75 9.811e-003 8.299e-003 5.925e-003 7.190e-003
5.172e-003 3.277e-002 1.216e-002
1 7.949e-003 6.184e-003 4.643e-003 5.437e-003
4.469e-003 2.935e-002 8.667e-003
2 4.678e-003 3.513e-003 2.485e-003 2.981e-003
2.951e-003 1.887e-002 4.045e-003
3 2.983e-003 2.578e-003 1.883e-003 1.860e-003
2.134e-003 1.022e-002 2.696e-003
4 2.092e-003 1.958e-003 1.578e-003 1.319e-003
1.470e-003 6.250e-003 2.022e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 9.835e-003 7.516e-003 6.520e-003 7.345e-003
7.386e-003 2.369e-002 1.712e-002
0.05 1.246e-002 8.211e-003 6.816e-003 9.689e-003
8.751e-003 3.208e-002 2.558e-002
0.1 1.493e-002 9.142e-003 9.006e-003 9.478e-003
9.715e-003 4.417e-002 3.041e-002
0.2 2.092e-002 1.215e-002 1.496e-002 1.059e-002
1.066e-002 6.246e-002 5.002e-002
0.3 2.316e-002 1.532e-002 1.728e-002 1.367e-002
1.132e-002 6.951e-002 4.694e-002
0.4 2.323e-002 1.929e-002 1.685e-002 1.418e-002
1.142e-002 6.802e-002 4.080e-002
0.5 2.225e-002 2.071e-002 1.548e-002 1.453e-002
1.128e-002 6.463e-002 3.386e-002
0.75 1.888e-002 1.686e-002 1.261e-002 1.460e-002
1.024e-002 5.742e-002 2.278e-002
1 1.551e-002 1.272e-002 9.986e-003 1.113e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 90 of 93
8.886e-003 5.299e-002 1.668e-002
2 9.375e-003 7.355e-003 5.476e-003 6.047e-003
5.903e-003 3.566e-002 8.532e-003
3 6.068e-003 5.351e-003 4.114e-003 3.779e-003
4.245e-003 2.002e-002 5.688e-003
4 4.262e-003 4.028e-003 3.392e-003 2.603e-003
2.912e-003 1.249e-002 4.266e-003
Source: Wasatch Monocline (Class B)
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 165.78 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 7.50 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.645e-002 1.522e-002 1.178e-002 1.365e-002
1.504e-002 3.288e-002 2.028e-002
0.05 2.054e-002 1.752e-002 1.311e-002 1.855e-002
1.958e-002 4.255e-002 2.535e-002
0.1 2.431e-002 2.150e-002 1.619e-002 1.785e-002
2.362e-002 5.687e-002 2.790e-002
0.2 3.099e-002 2.686e-002 2.262e-002 1.770e-002
2.397e-002 8.132e-002 4.629e-002
0.3 3.260e-002 2.884e-002 2.287e-002 2.095e-002
2.221e-002 8.940e-002 4.689e-002
0.4 3.143e-002 3.108e-002 2.068e-002 1.986e-002
2.020e-002 8.680e-002 4.386e-002
0.5 2.917e-002 3.082e-002 1.809e-002 1.884e-002
1.847e-002 8.092e-002 3.837e-002
0.75 2.373e-002 2.438e-002 1.349e-002 1.659e-002
1.496e-002 7.043e-002 2.799e-002
1 1.899e-002 1.851e-002 1.029e-002 1.190e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 91 of 93
1.214e-002 6.322e-002 2.101e-002
2 1.106e-002 1.041e-002 5.741e-003 6.971e-003
7.123e-003 4.084e-002 9.281e-003
3 7.364e-003 7.787e-003 4.769e-003 4.652e-003
5.001e-003 2.304e-002 6.187e-003
4 5.369e-003 5.935e-003 4.324e-003 3.481e-003
3.534e-003 1.450e-002 4.640e-003
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 2.872e-002 2.854e-002 2.234e-002 2.449e-002
2.646e-002 5.042e-002 3.311e-002
0.05 3.727e-002 3.313e-002 2.650e-002 3.512e-002
3.553e-002 6.591e-002 4.628e-002
0.1 4.538e-002 4.133e-002 3.412e-002 3.545e-002
4.388e-002 9.076e-002 5.346e-002
0.2 5.681e-002 5.229e-002 4.481e-002 3.369e-002
4.559e-002 1.337e-001 8.168e-002
0.3 5.989e-002 5.686e-002 4.451e-002 3.968e-002
4.282e-002 1.485e-001 8.274e-002
0.4 5.825e-002 6.179e-002 4.037e-002 3.788e-002
3.930e-002 1.456e-001 7.828e-002
0.5 5.489e-002 6.180e-002 3.593e-002 3.650e-002
3.618e-002 1.384e-001 6.959e-002
0.75 4.567e-002 4.953e-002 2.760e-002 3.369e-002
2.961e-002 1.234e-001 5.241e-002
1 3.703e-002 3.809e-002 2.126e-002 2.435e-002
2.414e-002 1.141e-001 4.044e-002
2 2.210e-002 2.179e-002 1.194e-002 1.414e-002
1.425e-002 7.718e-002 1.958e-002
3 1.495e-002 1.616e-002 1.010e-002 9.451e-003
9.945e-003 4.512e-002 1.305e-002
4 1.090e-002 1.221e-002 9.054e-003 6.867e-003
6.999e-003 2.897e-002 9.789e-003
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 92 of 93
Source: West Kaibab Fault System
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 151.84 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
Magnitude: 7.40 Mw
Fractile: 0.50
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 1.728e-002 1.602e-002 1.279e-002 1.478e-002
1.561e-002 3.331e-002 2.110e-002
0.05 2.199e-002 1.865e-002 1.463e-002 2.047e-002
2.077e-002 4.337e-002 2.750e-002
0.1 2.637e-002 2.337e-002 1.833e-002 2.034e-002
2.544e-002 5.796e-002 3.082e-002
0.2 3.313e-002 2.874e-002 2.514e-002 2.003e-002
2.571e-002 8.194e-002 5.018e-002
0.3 3.405e-002 2.983e-002 2.475e-002 2.286e-002
2.343e-002 8.903e-002 4.975e-002
0.4 3.224e-002 3.116e-002 2.199e-002 2.128e-002
2.102e-002 8.580e-002 4.572e-002
0.5 2.955e-002 3.036e-002 1.903e-002 1.980e-002
1.903e-002 7.954e-002 3.949e-002
0.75 2.362e-002 2.364e-002 1.396e-002 1.700e-002
1.513e-002 6.850e-002 2.824e-002
1 1.873e-002 1.789e-002 1.055e-002 1.206e-002
1.213e-002 6.103e-002 2.103e-002
2 1.068e-002 9.916e-003 5.673e-003 6.883e-003
6.906e-003 3.873e-002 9.358e-003
3 7.047e-003 7.338e-003 4.625e-003 4.546e-003
4.760e-003 2.170e-002 6.238e-003
4 5.101e-003 5.538e-003 4.125e-003 3.381e-003
3.328e-003 1.359e-002 4.679e-003
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/14/2023 12:58:32 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 93 of 93
Fractile: 0.84
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Weighted Mean of Attenuation Equations
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS
2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
PGA 3.016e-002 3.005e-002 2.405e-002 2.652e-002
2.745e-002 5.108e-002 3.444e-002
0.05 3.997e-002 3.527e-002 2.944e-002 3.875e-002
3.768e-002 6.717e-002 5.020e-002
0.1 4.936e-002 4.493e-002 3.842e-002 4.040e-002
4.725e-002 9.249e-002 5.905e-002
0.2 6.078e-002 5.595e-002 4.931e-002 3.812e-002
4.890e-002 1.347e-001 8.855e-002
0.3 6.254e-002 5.882e-002 4.761e-002 4.330e-002
4.517e-002 1.478e-001 8.779e-002
0.4 5.973e-002 6.195e-002 4.247e-002 4.058e-002
4.091e-002 1.439e-001 8.159e-002
0.5 5.556e-002 6.088e-002 3.743e-002 3.836e-002
3.728e-002 1.361e-001 7.161e-002
0.75 4.545e-002 4.802e-002 2.832e-002 3.452e-002
2.994e-002 1.200e-001 5.289e-002
1 3.651e-002 3.681e-002 2.160e-002 2.469e-002
2.411e-002 1.102e-001 4.047e-002
2 2.133e-002 2.076e-002 1.165e-002 1.396e-002
1.382e-002 7.318e-002 1.974e-002
3 1.428e-002 1.523e-002 9.629e-003 9.235e-003
9.465e-003 4.249e-002 1.316e-002
4 1.034e-002 1.139e-002 8.529e-003 6.670e-003
6.591e-003 2.715e-002 9.870e-003
Source: White Mountain Area Faults
Region: Utah Deterministic
Closest Distance: 158.66 km
Amplitude Units: Acceleration (g)
ATTACHMENT C5
PROBABILISTIC ANALYSES

ATTACHMENT C5.1
SUMMARY OF PROBABILISTIC CHARACTERISTICS

Appendix C5.1 Probabilistic Characteristics of Quaternary Faults and Folds Capable of Generating a PGA of 0.05g or
Greater at Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility

Name of Fault ID
Number
Age of Most Recent
Prehistoric Deformation
(ya)1
Probability
of Activity
Dip2
(degrees)
Maximum
Seismogenic
Depth2
(km)
Rate of
Activity2
(mm/yr)
MCE3
Fault 1, Bright Angel
System (Class B) 2514 Quaternary (<1.6 Ma) 0.1 60 (1.0) 15 (1.0)
0.005 (0.2)
0.02 (0.6)
0.2 (0.2)
5.4
5.7
6.0
Fault 2, Bright Angel
System (Class B) 2514 Quaternary (<1.6 Ma) 0.5 60 (1.0) 15 (1.0)
0.005 (0.2)
0.02 (0.6)
0.2 (0.2)
5.9
6.2
6.5
Fault 3, Bright Angel
System (Class B) 2514 Quaternary (<1.6 Ma) 0.1 60 (1.0) 15 (1.0)
0.005 (0.2)
0.02 (0.6)
0.2 (0.2)
6.4
6.7
7.0
Shay Graben Fault (Class
B) 2513 Quaternary (<1.6 Ma) 0.1 60 (1.0) 15 (1.0)
0.005 (0.2)
0.02 (0.6)
0.2 (0.2)
6.7
7.0
7.3
Aquarius and Awapa
Plateaus faults 2505 Quaternary (<1.6 Ma) 1.0
40 (0.2)
60 (0.6)
80 (0.2)
12 (0.2)
15 (0.6)
20 (0.2)
0.005 (0.2)
0.02 (0.6)
0.2 (0.2)
6.9
7.2
7.5
Thousand Lake Fault 2506 Quaternary (<750 ka) 1.0
40 (0.2)
60 (0.6)
80 (0.2)
12 (0.2)
15 (0.6)
20 (0.2)
0.02 (0.2)
0.08 (0.6)
0.1 (0.2)
6.7
7.1
7.4

Notes: 1) Years ago, ka = thousand years ago, Ma = million years ago
2) Number in parentheses represents weights for each parameter
3) The middle number is the magnitude of the Maximum Credible Earthquake as calculated by Wells and Coppersmith (1994), an additional minimum and maximum of
MCE +0.3 and MCE -0.3 are entered for each model in the analysis of the fault to account for standard error in their equation.
ATTACHMENT C5.2
PROBABILISTIC EZ-FRISK SOFTWARE INPUT

File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 1 of 35
**********************************************
***** EZ-FRISK *****
***** SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS DEFINITION *****
***** FUGRO CONSULTANTS, INC. *****
***** WALNUT CREEK, CA USA *****
**********************************************
PROGRAM VERSION
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
ANALYSIS TITLE:
Shootaring Probabilistic
ANALYSIS TYPE:
Single Site Analysis
SITE COORDINATES
Latitude 37.71
Longitude -110.7
INTENSITY TYPE: Spectral Response @ 5% Damping
HAZARD DEAGGREGATION
Status: ON
Deagregation Scenario 1
Period: PGA
Amplitude: 0.2 Acceleration (g)
Bin Configuration
Magnitude
Scale: Moment Magnitude
Lowest Value: 4 Mw
Highest Value: 9 Mw
Bin Size: 0.1
Distance
Lowest Value: 0 km
Highest Value: 300 km
Bin Size: 2.5 km
Epsilon
Lowest Value: -2.2
Highest Value: 4.2
Bin Size: 0.2
SOIL AMPLIFICATION
Method: Do not use soil amplification
ATTENUATION EQUATION SITE PARAMETERS
Depth[Vs=1000m/s] (m): 2
Estimate Z1 from Vs30 for CY NGA: 1
Regional Code: Default
Subduction Zone Setting: Unknown
Vs30 (m/s): 1000
Vs30 Is Measured: 0
Z25 (km): 0.43
AMPLITUDES - Acceleration (g)
0.0001
0.001
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 2 of 35
0.01
0.02
0.05
0.07
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.7
1
2
3
PERIODS (s)
PGA
0.05
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.75
1
2
3
4
DETERMINISTIC FRACTILES
PLOTTING PARAMETERS
Period at which to plot PGA: 0.0001
CALCULATIONAL PARAMETERS
Fault Seismic Sources -
Maximum inclusion distance : 1000 km
Down dip integration increment : 1 km
Horizontal integration increment : 1 km
Number rupture length per earthquake : 4
Subduction Interface Seismic Sources -
Maximum inclusion distance : 1000 km
Down dip integration increment : 5 km
Horizontal integration increment : 20 km
Number rupture length per earthquake : 1
Subduction Slab Seismic Sources -
Maximum inclusion distance : 1000 km
Down dip integration increment : 5 km
Horizontal integration increment : 20 km
Number rupture length per earthquake : 1
Area Seismic Sources -
Maximum inclusion distance : 1000 km
Vertical integration increment : 3 km
Number of rupture azimuths : 3
Minimum epicentral distance step : 0.5 km
Maximum epicentral distance step : 10 km
Gridded Seismic Sources -
Maximum inclusion distance : 400 km
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 3 of 35
Default number of rupture azimuths : 10
Maximum distance for default azimuths : 20 km
Minimum distance for one azimuth : 70
Use binned calcuations if possible : true
Bins per decade in distance (km) : 20
All Seismic Sources -
Magnitude integration step : 0.1 M
Apply magnitude scaling : NO
Include near-source directivity : NO
ATTENUATION EQUATIONS
Name: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Database: C:\Program Files (x86)\EZ-FRISK 8.07\Files\standard.bin-attendb
Base: Abrahamson-Silva 1997
Truncation Type: Trunc Sigma*Value
Truncation Value: 3
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Distance Type: Distance To Rupture
Name: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Database: C:\Program Files (x86)\EZ-FRISK 8.07\Files\standard.bin-attendb
Base: Abrahamson-et al 2014 NGA West 2
Truncation Type: USGS 2008 NSHM Truncation
Truncation Value: 3
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Distance Type: Distance To Rupture
Name: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Database: C:\Program Files (x86)\EZ-FRISK 8.07\Files\standard.bin-attendb
Base: Boore-et al 2014 NGA West 2
Truncation Type: USGS 2008 NSHM Truncation
Truncation Value: 3
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Distance Type: Horizontal Distance To Rupture
Name: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Database: C:\Program Files (x86)\EZ-FRISK 8.07\Files\standard.bin-attendb
Base: Campbell-Bozorgnia 2014 NGA West 2
Truncation Type: USGS 2008 NSHM Truncation
Truncation Value: 3
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Distance Type: Distance To Rupture
Name: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Database: C:\Program Files (x86)\EZ-FRISK 8.07\Files\standard.bin-attendb
Base: Chiou-Youngs 2014 NGA West 2
Truncation Type: USGS 2008 NSHM Truncation
Truncation Value: 3
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Distance Type: Distance To Rupture
Name: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
Database: C:\Program Files (x86)\EZ-FRISK 8.07\Files\standard.bin-attendb
Base: Spudich 1997/99
Truncation Type: Trunc Sigma*Value
Truncation Value: 3
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 4 of 35
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Distance Type: Horizontal Distance To Rupture
SEISMIC SOURCE SUMMARY TABLE
Closest
Deterministic Fault Dip Dips Site
Source Region Distance
Magnitude Mechanism Angle To Lies
Fault 1, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B) Utah Probabilistic 9.56
5.7000 Normal 60.0000 NW SW
Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B) Utah Probabilistic 11.47
6.2000 Normal 60.0000 SW SW
Fault 3, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B) Utah Probabilistic 32.54
6.7000 Normal 60.0000 NW NW
Shay Graben Fault (Class B) Utah Probabilistic 87.97
7.0000 Normal 60.0000 NW W
Aquarius and Awapa Plateaus Faults 40_12 Utah Probabilistic 102.25
7.2000 Normal 40.0000 W E
Aquarius and Awapa Plateaus Faults 40_15 Utah Probabilistic 102.25
7.2000 Normal 40.0000 W E
Aquarius and Awapa Plateaus Faults 40_20 Utah Probabilistic 102.25
7.2000 Normal 40.0000 W E
Aquarius and Awapa Plateaus Faults 60_12 Utah Probabilistic 102.25
7.2000 Normal 60.0000 W E
Aquarius and Awapa Plateaus Faults 60_15 Utah Probabilistic 102.25
7.2000 Normal 60.0000 W E
Aquarius and Awapa Plateaus Faults 60_20 Utah Probabilistic 102.25
7.2000 Normal 60.0000 W E
Aquarius and Awapa Plateaus Faults 80_12 Utah Probabilistic 102.25
7.2000 Normal 80.0000 W E
Aquarius and Awapa Plateaus Faults 80_15 Utah Probabilistic 102.25
7.2000 Normal 80.0000 W E
Aquarius and Awapa Plateaus Faults 80_20 Utah Probabilistic 102.25
7.2000 Normal 80.0000 W E
Thousand Lake Fault 40_12 Utah Probabilistic 90.85
7.1000 Normal 40.0000 W SE
Thousand Lake Fault 40_15 Utah Probabilistic 90.85
7.1000 Normal 40.0000 W SE
Thousand Lake Fault 40_20 Utah Probabilistic 90.85
7.1000 Normal 40.0000 W SE
Thousand Lake Fault 60_12 Utah Probabilistic 90.85
7.1000 Normal 60.0000 W SE
Thousand Lake Fault 60_15 Utah Probabilistic 90.85
7.1000 Normal 60.0000 W SE
Thousand Lake Fault 60_20 Utah Probabilistic 90.85
7.1000 Normal 60.0000 W SE
Thousand Lake Fault 80_12 Utah Probabilistic 90.85
7.1000 Normal 80.0000 W SE
Thousand Lake Fault 80_15 Utah Probabilistic 90.85
7.1000 Normal 80.0000 W SE
Thousand Lake Fault 80_20 Utah Probabilistic 90.85
7.1000 Normal 80.0000 W SE
Shallow - Extensional Gridded USGS 2014 WUS Gridded Source 0.00
8.0000 N|SS 90.0000 -- Above
300km Circle Around Shootaring Utah Probabilistic 3.00
6.3000 Area N/A N/A Above
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 5 of 35
SEISMIC SOURCES
Name: Fault 1, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
Region: Utah Probabilistic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.10000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 5.7
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.05 Slip 5.000e-003 5.400000 6.000000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.100000 Slip 2.000e-002 5.400000 6.000000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 5.400000 6.000000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 5.400000 6.000000 0.000000 5.700000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 5.400000 6.000000 0.000000 5.700000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 5.400000 6.000000 0.000000 5.700000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
37.7827 -110.5771
37.7528 -110.6020
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 6 of 35
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Fault 2, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
Region: Utah Probabilistic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.50000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 6.2
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.05 Slip 5.000e-003 5.900000 6.500000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.100000 Slip 2.000e-002 5.900000 6.500000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 5.900000 6.500000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 5.900000 6.500000 0.000000 6.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 5.900000 6.500000 0.000000 6.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 5.900000 6.500000 0.000000 6.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
37.7715 -110.5709
37.6932 -110.5043
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 7 of 35
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Fault 3, Bright Angel Fault System (Class B)
Region: Utah Probabilistic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.10000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 6.7
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.05 Slip 5.000e-003 6.400000 7.000000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.100000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.400000 7.000000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.400000 7.000000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.400000 7.000000 0.000000 6.700000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.400000 7.000000 0.000000 6.700000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.400000 7.000000 0.000000 6.700000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 8 of 35
Latitude Longitude
37.6653 -110.2595
37.4752 -110.3635
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Shay Graben Fault (Class B)
Region: Utah Probabilistic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.10000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.05 Slip 5.000e-003 6.700000 7.300000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.100000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.700000 7.300000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.700000 7.300000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000 7.000000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000 7.000000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.700000 7.300000 0.000000 7.000000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 9 of 35
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.0420 -109.3080
37.8970 -109.7220
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Aquarius and Awapa Plateaus Faults 40_12
Region: Utah Probabilistic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.04000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.2
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
40 40 0 0.1 12
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.05 Slip 5.000e-003 6.900000 7.500000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.100000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.900000 7.500000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.900000 7.500000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.900000 7.500000 0.000000 7.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.900000 7.500000 0.000000 7.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.900000 7.500000 0.000000 7.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 10 of 35
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.4780 -111.7240
38.0020 -111.8050
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Aquarius and Awapa Plateaus Faults 40_15
Region: Utah Probabilistic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.12000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.2
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
40 40 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.05 Slip 5.000e-003 6.900000 7.500000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.100000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.900000 7.500000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.900000 7.500000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.900000 7.500000 0.000000 7.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.900000 7.500000 0.000000 7.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.900000 7.500000 0.000000 7.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 11 of 35
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.4780 -111.7240
38.0020 -111.8050
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Aquarius and Awapa Plateaus Faults 40_20
Region: Utah Probabilistic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.04000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.2
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
40 40 0 0.1 20
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.05 Slip 5.000e-003 6.900000 7.500000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.100000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.900000 7.500000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.900000 7.500000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.900000 7.500000 0.000000 7.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.900000 7.500000 0.000000 7.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.900000 7.500000 0.000000 7.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 12 of 35
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.4780 -111.7240
38.0020 -111.8050
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Aquarius and Awapa Plateaus Faults 60_12
Region: Utah Probabilistic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.12000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.2
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 12
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.05 Slip 5.000e-003 6.900000 7.500000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.100000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.900000 7.500000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.900000 7.500000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.900000 7.500000 0.000000 7.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.900000 7.500000 0.000000 7.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 13 of 35
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.900000 7.500000 0.000000 7.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.4780 -111.7240
38.0020 -111.8050
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Aquarius and Awapa Plateaus Faults 60_15
Region: Utah Probabilistic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.36000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.2
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.05 Slip 5.000e-003 6.900000 7.500000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.100000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.900000 7.500000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.900000 7.500000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 14 of 35
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.900000 7.500000 0.000000 7.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.900000 7.500000 0.000000 7.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.900000 7.500000 0.000000 7.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.4780 -111.7240
38.0020 -111.8050
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Aquarius and Awapa Plateaus Faults 60_20
Region: Utah Probabilistic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.12000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.2
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 20
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.05 Slip 5.000e-003 6.900000 7.500000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 15 of 35
Exponential 0.100000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.900000 7.500000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.900000 7.500000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.900000 7.500000 0.000000 7.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.900000 7.500000 0.000000 7.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.900000 7.500000 0.000000 7.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.4780 -111.7240
38.0020 -111.8050
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Aquarius and Awapa Plateaus Faults 80_12
Region: Utah Probabilistic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.04000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.2
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
80 80 0 0.1 12
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 16 of 35
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.05 Slip 5.000e-003 6.900000 7.500000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.100000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.900000 7.500000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.900000 7.500000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.900000 7.500000 0.000000 7.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.900000 7.500000 0.000000 7.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.900000 7.500000 0.000000 7.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.4780 -111.7240
38.0020 -111.8050
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Aquarius and Awapa Plateaus Faults 80_15
Region: Utah Probabilistic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.12000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.2
Fault Profile Parameters:
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 17 of 35
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
80 80 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.05 Slip 5.000e-003 6.900000 7.500000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.100000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.900000 7.500000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.900000 7.500000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.900000 7.500000 0.000000 7.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.900000 7.500000 0.000000 7.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.900000 7.500000 0.000000 7.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.4780 -111.7240
38.0020 -111.8050
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Aquarius and Awapa Plateaus Faults 80_20
Region: Utah Probabilistic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 18 of 35
Probability of Activity: 0.04000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.2
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
80 80 0 0.1 20
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.05 Slip 5.000e-003 6.900000 7.500000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.100000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.900000 7.500000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.900000 7.500000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.900000 7.500000 0.000000 7.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.900000 7.500000 0.000000 7.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.900000 7.500000 0.000000 7.200000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.4780 -111.7240
38.0020 -111.8050
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Thousand Lake Fault 40_12
Region: Utah Probabilistic
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 19 of 35
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.04000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.1
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
40 40 0 0.1 12
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.05 Slip 5.000e-003 6.800000 7.400000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.100000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.800000 7.400000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.800000 7.400000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.800000 7.400000 0.000000 7.100000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.800000 7.400000 0.000000 7.100000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.800000 7.400000 0.000000 7.100000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.5390 -111.5080
38.1080 -111.6050
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 20 of 35
*******************************************
Name: Thousand Lake Fault 40_15
Region: Utah Probabilistic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.12000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.1
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
40 40 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.05 Slip 5.000e-003 6.800000 7.400000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.100000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.800000 7.400000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.800000 7.400000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.800000 7.400000 0.000000 7.100000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.800000 7.400000 0.000000 7.100000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.800000 7.400000 0.000000 7.100000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.5390 -111.5080
38.1080 -111.6050
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 21 of 35
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Thousand Lake Fault 40_20
Region: Utah Probabilistic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.04000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.1
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
40 40 0 0.1 20
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.05 Slip 5.000e-003 6.800000 7.400000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.100000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.800000 7.400000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.800000 7.400000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.800000 7.400000 0.000000 7.100000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.800000 7.400000 0.000000 7.100000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.800000 7.400000 0.000000 7.100000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.5390 -111.5080
38.1080 -111.6050
Attenuation Equations for Source:
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 22 of 35
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Thousand Lake Fault 60_12
Region: Utah Probabilistic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.12000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.1
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 12
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.05 Slip 5.000e-003 6.800000 7.400000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.100000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.800000 7.400000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.800000 7.400000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.800000 7.400000 0.000000 7.100000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.800000 7.400000 0.000000 7.100000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.800000 7.400000 0.000000 7.100000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 23 of 35
38.5390 -111.5080
38.1080 -111.6050
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Thousand Lake Fault 60_15
Region: Utah Probabilistic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.36000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.1
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.05 Slip 5.000e-003 6.800000 7.400000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.100000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.800000 7.400000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.800000 7.400000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.800000 7.400000 0.000000 7.100000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.800000 7.400000 0.000000 7.100000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.800000 7.400000 0.000000 7.100000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 24 of 35
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.5390 -111.5080
38.1080 -111.6050
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Thousand Lake Fault 60_20
Region: Utah Probabilistic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.12000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.1
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
60 60 0 0.1 20
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.05 Slip 5.000e-003 6.800000 7.400000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.100000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.800000 7.400000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.800000 7.400000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.800000 7.400000 0.000000 7.100000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.800000 7.400000 0.000000 7.100000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.800000 7.400000 0.000000 7.100000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 25 of 35
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.5390 -111.5080
38.1080 -111.6050
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Thousand Lake Fault 80_12
Region: Utah Probabilistic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.04000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.1
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
80 80 0 0.1 12
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.05 Slip 5.000e-003 6.800000 7.400000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.100000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.800000 7.400000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.800000 7.400000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.800000 7.400000 0.000000 7.100000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.800000 7.400000 0.000000 7.100000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.800000 7.400000 0.000000 7.100000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 26 of 35
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.5390 -111.5080
38.1080 -111.6050
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Thousand Lake Fault 80_15
Region: Utah Probabilistic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.12000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.1
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
80 80 0 0.1 15
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.05 Slip 5.000e-003 6.800000 7.400000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.100000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.800000 7.400000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.800000 7.400000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.800000 7.400000 0.000000 7.100000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.800000 7.400000 0.000000 7.100000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.800000 7.400000 0.000000 7.100000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 27 of 35
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.5390 -111.5080
38.1080 -111.6050
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Thousand Lake Fault 80_20
Region: Utah Probabilistic
Category:Fault
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.04000000
Deterministic Magnitude: 7.1
Fault Profile Parameters:
Dip1 Dip2 Depth1 Depth2 Depth3
80 80 0 0.1 20
Magnitude Recurrence Distributions:
ModelType Weight RateType Rate MinMag MaxMag Beta Mean
Sigma Delta1 Delta2
Exponential 0.05 Slip 5.000e-003 6.800000 7.400000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.100000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.800000 7.400000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Exponential 0.050000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.800000 7.400000 1.717200 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 5.000e-003 6.800000 7.400000 0.000000 7.100000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.400000 Slip 2.000e-002 6.800000 7.400000 0.000000 7.100000
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Normal 0.200000 Slip 2.000e-001 6.800000 7.400000 0.000000 7.100000
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 28 of 35
0.120000 0.000000 0.000000
Rupture Length Parameters
Rupture Dimensioning Al Bl Sigl Aw Bw Sigw Aa
Ba Sigw
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Length and width 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 4.000000 0.000000 0.100000 --
-- --
Trace Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
38.5390 -111.5080
38.1080 -111.6050
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
Name: Shallow - Extensional Gridded
Region: USGS 2014 WUS Gridded Source
Category:Composite Seismic Source
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Regions\USGS2014 Lower 48\Files\USGS 2014
Lower 48.bin-ssdb
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 1
------ Start Nested Sources forShallow - Extensional Gridded -------
Name: Extensional Gridded, adSm, Tapered_M7.95, Strike Slip
Region: USGS 2014 Western US
Category:Gridded
FileType: USGS2008
General Parameters
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.0133333
Latitude Increment, degrees: 0.1
Longitude Increment, degrees: 0.1
Magnitude Threshold for Weighting: 5
Earthquake Model Parameters (Varies point to point?)
Cell Weight: 1
Fault Mechanism: Strike Slip
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 29 of 35
Depth to Top of Rupture, km: 5
Minimum Magnitude: 5
Maximum Magnitude: 8
Rate at Minimum Magnitude, events per year: 0 Yes
Beta: 1.842
Horizontal Rupture Length, A parameter: -3.22
Horizontal Rupture Length, B parameter: 0.69
Rupture Strike Azimuth Model: Random Strike
Name: Extensional Gridded, adSm, Tapered_M7.95, Normal
Region: USGS 2014 Western US
Category:Gridded
FileType: USGS2008
General Parameters
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.0266667
Latitude Increment, degrees: 0.1
Longitude Increment, degrees: 0.1
Magnitude Threshold for Weighting: 5
Earthquake Model Parameters (Varies point to point?)
Cell Weight: 1
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Depth to Top of Rupture, km: 5
Minimum Magnitude: 5
Maximum Magnitude: 8
Rate at Minimum Magnitude, events per year: 0 Yes
Beta: 1.842
Horizontal Rupture Length, A parameter: -3.22
Horizontal Rupture Length, B parameter: 0.69
Rupture Strike Azimuth Model: Random Strike
Name: Extensional Gridded, adSm, Truncated_M7.5, Char, Normal
Region: USGS 2014 Western US
Category:Gridded
FileType: USGS2008
General Parameters
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.16
Latitude Increment, degrees: 0.1
Longitude Increment, degrees: 0.1
Magnitude Threshold for Weighting: 5
Earthquake Model Parameters (Varies point to point?)
Cell Weight: 1
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Depth to Top of Rupture, km: 5
Minimum Magnitude: 5
Maximum Magnitude: 7 Yes
Rate at Minimum Magnitude, events per year: 0 Yes
Beta: 1.842
Horizontal Rupture Length, A parameter: -3.22
Horizontal Rupture Length, B parameter: 0.69
Rupture Strike Azimuth Model: Random Strike
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 30 of 35
Name: Extensional Gridded, adSm, Truncated_M7.5, Char, Strike Slip
Region: USGS 2014 Western US
Category:Gridded
FileType: USGS2008
General Parameters
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.08
Latitude Increment, degrees: 0.1
Longitude Increment, degrees: 0.1
Magnitude Threshold for Weighting: 5
Earthquake Model Parameters (Varies point to point?)
Cell Weight: 1
Fault Mechanism: Strike Slip
Depth to Top of Rupture, km: 5
Minimum Magnitude: 5
Maximum Magnitude: 7 Yes
Rate at Minimum Magnitude, events per year: 0 Yes
Beta: 1.842
Horizontal Rupture Length, A parameter: -3.22
Horizontal Rupture Length, B parameter: 0.69
Rupture Strike Azimuth Model: Random Strike
Name: Extensional Gridded, adSm, Truncated_M7.5, GR, Normal
Region: USGS 2014 Western US
Category:Gridded
FileType: USGS2008
General Parameters
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.08
Latitude Increment, degrees: 0.1
Longitude Increment, degrees: 0.1
Magnitude Threshold for Weighting: 5
Earthquake Model Parameters (Varies point to point?)
Cell Weight: 1
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Depth to Top of Rupture, km: 5
Minimum Magnitude: 5
Maximum Magnitude: 7 Yes
Rate at Minimum Magnitude, events per year: 0 Yes
Beta: 1.842
Horizontal Rupture Length, A parameter: -3.22
Horizontal Rupture Length, B parameter: 0.69
Rupture Strike Azimuth Model: Random Strike
Name: Extensional Gridded, adSm, Truncated_M7.5, GR, Strike Slip
Region: USGS 2014 Western US
Category:Gridded
FileType: USGS2008
General Parameters
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.04
Latitude Increment, degrees: 0.1
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 31 of 35
Longitude Increment, degrees: 0.1
Magnitude Threshold for Weighting: 5
Earthquake Model Parameters (Varies point to point?)
Cell Weight: 1
Fault Mechanism: Strike Slip
Depth to Top of Rupture, km: 5
Minimum Magnitude: 5
Maximum Magnitude: 7 Yes
Rate at Minimum Magnitude, events per year: 0 Yes
Beta: 1.842
Horizontal Rupture Length, A parameter: -3.22
Horizontal Rupture Length, B parameter: 0.69
Rupture Strike Azimuth Model: Random Strike
Name: Extensional Gridded, fixSm, Tapered_M7.95, Normal
Region: USGS 2014 Western US
Category:Gridded
FileType: USGS2008
General Parameters
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.04
Latitude Increment, degrees: 0.1
Longitude Increment, degrees: 0.1
Magnitude Threshold for Weighting: 5
Earthquake Model Parameters (Varies point to point?)
Cell Weight: 1
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Depth to Top of Rupture, km: 5
Minimum Magnitude: 5
Maximum Magnitude: 8
Rate at Minimum Magnitude, events per year: 0 Yes
Beta: 1.842
Horizontal Rupture Length, A parameter: -3.22
Horizontal Rupture Length, B parameter: 0.69
Rupture Strike Azimuth Model: Random Strike
Name: Extensional Gridded, fixSm, Tapered_M7.95, Strike Slip
Region: USGS 2014 Western US
Category:Gridded
FileType: USGS2008
General Parameters
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.02
Latitude Increment, degrees: 0.1
Longitude Increment, degrees: 0.1
Magnitude Threshold for Weighting: 5
Earthquake Model Parameters (Varies point to point?)
Cell Weight: 1
Fault Mechanism: Strike Slip
Depth to Top of Rupture, km: 5
Minimum Magnitude: 5
Maximum Magnitude: 8
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 32 of 35
Rate at Minimum Magnitude, events per year: 0 Yes
Beta: 1.842
Horizontal Rupture Length, A parameter: -3.22
Horizontal Rupture Length, B parameter: 0.69
Rupture Strike Azimuth Model: Random Strike
Name: Extensional Gridded, fixSm, Truncated_M7.5, Char, Normal
Region: USGS 2014 Western US
Category:Gridded
FileType: USGS2008
General Parameters
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.24
Latitude Increment, degrees: 0.1
Longitude Increment, degrees: 0.1
Magnitude Threshold for Weighting: 5
Earthquake Model Parameters (Varies point to point?)
Cell Weight: 1
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Depth to Top of Rupture, km: 5
Minimum Magnitude: 5
Maximum Magnitude: 7 Yes
Rate at Minimum Magnitude, events per year: 0 Yes
Beta: 1.842
Horizontal Rupture Length, A parameter: -3.22
Horizontal Rupture Length, B parameter: 0.69
Rupture Strike Azimuth Model: Random Strike
Name: Extensional Gridded, fixSm, Truncated_M7.5, Char, Strike Slip
Region: USGS 2014 Western US
Category:Gridded
FileType: USGS2008
General Parameters
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.12
Latitude Increment, degrees: 0.1
Longitude Increment, degrees: 0.1
Magnitude Threshold for Weighting: 5
Earthquake Model Parameters (Varies point to point?)
Cell Weight: 1
Fault Mechanism: Strike Slip
Depth to Top of Rupture, km: 5
Minimum Magnitude: 5
Maximum Magnitude: 7 Yes
Rate at Minimum Magnitude, events per year: 0 Yes
Beta: 1.842
Horizontal Rupture Length, A parameter: -3.22
Horizontal Rupture Length, B parameter: 0.69
Rupture Strike Azimuth Model: Random Strike
Name: Extensional Gridded, fixSm, Truncated_M7.5, GR, Normal
Region: USGS 2014 Western US
Category:Gridded
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 33 of 35
FileType: USGS2008
General Parameters
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.12
Latitude Increment, degrees: 0.1
Longitude Increment, degrees: 0.1
Magnitude Threshold for Weighting: 5
Earthquake Model Parameters (Varies point to point?)
Cell Weight: 1
Fault Mechanism: Normal
Depth to Top of Rupture, km: 5
Minimum Magnitude: 5
Maximum Magnitude: 7 Yes
Rate at Minimum Magnitude, events per year: 0 Yes
Beta: 1.842
Horizontal Rupture Length, A parameter: -3.22
Horizontal Rupture Length, B parameter: 0.69
Rupture Strike Azimuth Model: Random Strike
Name: Extensional Gridded, fixSm, Truncated_M7.5, GR, Strike Slip
Region: USGS 2014 Western US
Category:Gridded
FileType: USGS2008
General Parameters
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 0.06
Latitude Increment, degrees: 0.1
Longitude Increment, degrees: 0.1
Magnitude Threshold for Weighting: 5
Earthquake Model Parameters (Varies point to point?)
Cell Weight: 1
Fault Mechanism: Strike Slip
Depth to Top of Rupture, km: 5
Minimum Magnitude: 5
Maximum Magnitude: 7 Yes
Rate at Minimum Magnitude, events per year: 0 Yes
Beta: 1.842
Horizontal Rupture Length, A parameter: -3.22
Horizontal Rupture Length, B parameter: 0.69
Rupture Strike Azimuth Model: Random Strike
------ End Nested Sources for Shallow - Extensional Gridded -------
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.2 0.200000 Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.2 0.200000 Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.1 0.100000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.1 0.100000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 34 of 35
Name: 300km Circle Around Shootaring
Region: Utah Probabilistic
Category:Area
Database: C:\Users\dgarcia\AppData\Local\Fugro\EZ-FRISK\Files\user.xml-ssdb
Fault Mechanism: Area
Magnitude Scale: Moment Magnitude
Probability of Activity: 1
Minimum Depth: 3 km
Maximum Depth: 20 km
Boundary Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
40.4150 -110.6930
40.3730 -111.3070
40.1730 -112.1280
39.8190 -112.8610
39.4350 -113.3520
39.0320 -113.6950
38.6270 -113.9200
38.2230 -114.0500
37.8150 -114.1000
37.4100 -114.0710
37.0050 -113.9640
36.5370 -113.7360
36.2230 -113.5060
35.9160 -113.2040
35.6080 -112.8010
35.3020 -112.2040
35.0870 -111.4780
35.0120 -110.7550
35.0660 -110.0300
35.2600 -109.3050
35.5350 -108.7110
35.8380 -108.2760
36.1400 -107.9600
36.4510 -107.7110
36.7600 -107.5330
37.0720 -107.4050
37.3840 -107.3270
37.6990 -107.2930
38.0110 -107.3080
38.3260 -107.3690
38.6450 -107.4830
38.9620 -107.6530
39.2840 -107.8970
39.6090 -108.2390
39.9140 -108.6910
40.1390 -109.1730
40.3350 -109.8550
40.4150 -110.6930
Magnitude Recurrence Distribution:
Minimum Magnitude: 4 Mw
Maximum Magnitude: 6.3 Mw
Activity Rate: 0.9
Beta: 1.72
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:52:14 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 35 of 35
Al: -4
Bl: 0
Attenuation Equations for Source:
Raw Weight Normalized Weight Name
0.5 0.500000 Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
0.25 0.250000 Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
0.25 0.250000 Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
*******************************************
MAGNITUDE CONVERSIONS
This analysis does not require any magnitude conversions.
Note: Your analysis may indirectly use magnitude conversions that are not listed here.
Echo File Creation Time: 18:52:14 Monday, September 18, 2023
ATTACHMENT C5.3
PROBABILISTIC RESULTS
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:53:21 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 1 of 3
Probabilistic Spectra results for EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
ANNUAL FREQUENCY OF EXCEEDANCE: 2.107e-003
RETURN PERIOD: 474.6
PROBABILITY OF EXCEEDENCE: 10.0% IN 50.0 YEARS
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Mean
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8
PGA 6.713e-002 2.669e-002 2.262e-002 6.830e-002 2.249e-002 6.282e-002
7.085e-002
0.05 1.131e-001 3.231e-002 3.071e-002 1.285e-001 3.223e-002 1.040e-001
1.002e-001
0.1 1.413e-001 4.407e-002 4.637e-002 1.546e-001 4.203e-002 1.439e-001
1.209e-001
0.2 1.300e-001 5.037e-002 5.257e-002 1.167e-001 4.414e-002 1.481e-001
1.470e-001
0.3 1.056e-001 4.555e-002 4.367e-002 8.881e-002 3.875e-002 1.337e-001
1.224e-001
0.4 8.539e-002 4.304e-002 3.635e-002 6.721e-002 3.363e-002 1.180e-001
9.952e-002
0.5 7.052e-002 3.975e-002 3.111e-002 5.307e-002 2.959e-002 1.052e-001
7.960e-002
0.75 4.950e-002 2.804e-002 2.304e-002 3.663e-002 2.226e-002 8.382e-002
5.101e-002
1 3.713e-002 2.081e-002 1.709e-002 2.457e-002 1.706e-002 7.324e-002
3.610e-002
2 1.902e-002 1.056e-002 7.132e-003 9.776e-003 8.718e-003 4.323e-002
1.754e-002
3 1.078e-002 6.344e-003 4.685e-003 4.955e-003 4.465e-003 2.349e-002
1.170e-002
4 6.649e-003 4.080e-003 3.708e-003 3.220e-003 2.690e-003 1.445e-002
8.599e-003
ANNUAL FREQUENCY OF EXCEEDANCE: 1.026e-003
RETURN PERIOD: 974.8
PROBABILITY OF EXCEEDENCE: 5.0% IN 50.0 YEARS
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Mean
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8
PGA 9.527e-002 4.040e-002 3.276e-002 1.000e-001 3.294e-002 8.757e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:53:21 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 2 of 3
9.611e-002
0.05 1.651e-001 4.998e-002 4.575e-002 1.935e-001 4.921e-002 1.459e-001
1.402e-001
0.1 2.094e-001 6.904e-002 6.867e-002 2.332e-001 6.514e-002 2.034e-001
1.723e-001
0.2 1.854e-001 7.803e-002 7.502e-002 1.729e-001 6.718e-002 2.057e-001
1.995e-001
0.3 1.471e-001 6.982e-002 6.214e-002 1.284e-001 5.812e-002 1.815e-001
1.655e-001
0.4 1.184e-001 6.473e-002 5.206e-002 9.709e-002 4.991e-002 1.579e-001
1.354e-001
0.5 9.796e-002 5.948e-002 4.414e-002 7.605e-002 4.327e-002 1.391e-001
1.089e-001
0.75 6.898e-002 4.187e-002 3.201e-002 5.233e-002 3.185e-002 1.109e-001
7.059e-002
1 5.312e-002 3.019e-002 2.405e-002 3.447e-002 2.448e-002 9.736e-002
5.074e-002
2 2.662e-002 1.558e-002 1.100e-002 1.369e-002 1.269e-002 5.874e-002
2.441e-002
3 1.534e-002 1.064e-002 7.370e-003 7.607e-003 6.945e-003 3.151e-002
1.624e-002
4 1.026e-002 6.773e-003 5.751e-003 4.775e-003 3.945e-003 2.035e-002
1.220e-002
ANNUAL FREQUENCY OF EXCEEDANCE: 4.041e-004
RETURN PERIOD: 2474.9
PROBABILITY OF EXCEEDENCE: 2.0% IN 50.0 YEARS
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Mean
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8
PGA 1.422e-001 6.803e-002 5.333e-002 1.518e-001 5.406e-002 1.344e-001
1.372e-001
0.05 2.598e-001 8.489e-002 7.772e-002 3.051e-001 8.310e-002 2.246e-001
2.160e-001
0.1 3.313e-001 1.213e-001 1.166e-001 3.729e-001 1.137e-001 3.133e-001
2.717e-001
0.2 2.867e-001 1.350e-001 1.219e-001 2.758e-001 1.155e-001 3.135e-001
2.983e-001
0.3 2.241e-001 1.157e-001 9.626e-002 2.039e-001 9.665e-002 2.676e-001
2.463e-001
0.4 1.784e-001 1.036e-001 7.989e-002 1.510e-001 8.142e-002 2.291e-001
2.018e-001
0.5 1.459e-001 9.356e-002 6.784e-002 1.181e-001 6.981e-002 1.999e-001
1.642e-001
0.75 1.029e-001 6.652e-002 4.898e-002 8.036e-002 5.060e-002 1.549e-001
1.079e-001
1 7.957e-002 4.885e-002 3.649e-002 5.327e-002 3.806e-002 1.340e-001
7.816e-002
File: P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.8 Seismic Hazard Analysis EZ Frisk\~_Shootarin
Date modified: 09/18/2023 06:53:21 PM
EZ-FRISK 8.07 Build 044
Page 3 of 3
2 4.064e-002 2.431e-002 1.652e-002 2.089e-002 1.931e-002 8.177e-002
3.714e-002
3 2.338e-002 1.658e-002 1.219e-002 1.223e-002 1.135e-002 4.606e-002
2.479e-002
4 1.551e-002 1.171e-002 1.011e-002 7.951e-003 6.476e-003 2.815e-002
1.856e-002
ANNUAL FREQUENCY OF EXCEEDANCE: 1.000e-004
RETURN PERIOD: 10000.0
PROBABILITY OF EXCEEDENCE: 0.5% IN 50.0 YEARS
Column 1: Spectral Period
Column 2: Acceleration (g) for: Mean
Column 3: Acceleration (g) for: Abrahamson-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 4: Acceleration (g) for: Boore-et al (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 5: Acceleration (g) for: Campbell-Bozorgnia (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 6: Acceleration (g) for: Chiou-Youngs (2014) NGA West 2 USGS 2014
Column 7: Acceleration (g) for: Abra.-Silva (1997) Rock USGS 2002
Column 8: Acceleration (g) for: Spudich (1999) Rock USGS 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8
PGA 2.463e-001 1.441e-001 1.332e-001 2.638e-001 1.173e-001 2.488e-001
2.278e-001
0.05 4.614e-001 1.873e-001 2.067e-001 5.309e-001 1.937e-001 4.047e-001
4.012e-001
0.1 5.978e-001 2.832e-001 2.969e-001 6.695e-001 2.786e-001 5.625e-001
5.225e-001
0.2 5.176e-001 3.021e-001 2.992e-001 5.003e-001 2.756e-001 5.814e-001
5.408e-001
0.3 4.023e-001 2.368e-001 2.244e-001 3.704e-001 2.200e-001 4.794e-001
4.506e-001
0.4 3.183e-001 1.969e-001 1.791e-001 2.793e-001 1.783e-001 3.975e-001
3.753e-001
0.5 2.594e-001 1.699e-001 1.483e-001 2.192e-001 1.479e-001 3.370e-001
3.085e-001
0.75 1.797e-001 1.180e-001 1.001e-001 1.477e-001 1.010e-001 2.518e-001
2.080e-001
1 1.369e-001 8.770e-002 7.246e-002 9.871e-002 7.329e-002 2.138e-001
1.522e-001
2 7.127e-002 4.348e-002 3.158e-002 3.729e-002 3.313e-002 1.240e-001
6.986e-002
3 4.082e-002 2.879e-002 2.263e-002 2.194e-002 1.917e-002 7.270e-002
4.659e-002
4 2.701e-002 2.076e-002 1.857e-002 1.476e-002 1.209e-002 4.578e-002
3.485e-002
APPENDIX D
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
FROST DEPTH ANALYSIS

November 7, 2023 1 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

1.0 INTRODUCTION
This technical memorandum provides the frost depth analysis and results to support the closure
design for the tailings impoundment. The radon barrier should be located below the calculated
frost depth to protect it from freeze-thaw impacts.

2.0 FROST DEPTH ANALYSIS
The frost depth penetration into the final reclamation cover (cover) for the proposed tailings
storage facility (TSF) was determined using the procedure adopted by the U.S. Department of
Energy and accepted by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (DOE, 1989). The depth of freezing
into the cover (depth of frost penetration) is governed by the local climate, soil material and soil
moisture content expected during the operational life of the cover. The procedure used includes a
computational procedure to predict frost depth which was initially proposed by Berggren (1943).
Smith and Rager (2002) apply these previous studies to determine an adequate thickness of a
protective soil layer to protect an underlying compacted soil. The freezing depth was calculated
for a 200-year recurrence interval (0.5% probability of occurrence in any given year).

2.1 Analyzed Final Reclamation Cover Configuration
The following cover system is proposed to overlay the clay layer (radon barrier) and was analyzed
for frost penetration. The proposed cover system is presented on Figure D-1.

• 12-inches of rock mulch (erosion protection) consisting of gravel mixed with onsite
pediment soils.
• 42-inches of onsite pediment soil (biointrusion and frost protection.)
• 12-inches of onsite aeolian sand (capillary break.)

Technical Memorandum

To: Anfields Resources Holding Corp. From: Jason Andrews P.E.,
Denise Garcia P.G.,
David Smith E.I.T.
Company: Anfield Resources Holding Corp. Date: November 7, 2023
EA No.: 110444

Re: Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Closure Design
– Frost Depth Analysis
Frost Depth Analysis
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
.

November 7, 2023 2 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

2.2 Input parameters
Calculations

• Step 1 Determine freeze-index parameters.
Fifty years of historic temperature data consisting of maximum and minimum daily air
temperatures was obtained from Hanksville, Utah for the main data source, additional
alternative data sources included Grand Junction, Colorado and Page, Arizona. The historic
climate data sources and data used in the calculations are provided in Attachment D1.

The degree day calculation was used to compute the duration of freeze. The duration of
freeze is defined as length of time in days that the cumulative degree day is below freezing
(Smith and Rager, 2002). The degree day, defined as the mean daily temperature minus 32
degrees Fahrenheit (freezing point of water) (Smith and Rager, 2002) was calculated and
presented in Attachment D1. The cumulative degree-days versus the days in the freeze year
are plotted. The cumulative degree day plots are provided in Attachment D2.1 and are used
to determine the duration of freeze. The selection of points for the duration of freeze
calculation is provided in Attachment D2.2

• Step 2 Determine surface temperature correction factor.
A surface correction factor, N, is applied to the daily temperature data used to correct for
difference between air temperature and ground temperature. A surface correction factor of
0.7 for bare soil was chosen from Table 1 of Smith and Rager (2002).

• Step 3 Determine thermal properties.
Soil thermal properties: thermal conductivity, heat capacity, and latent heat of fusion are
products of empirical relationships between the dry unit weight (pcf) and gravimetric
moisture content (%). For the purpose of these calculations, the relationships presented by
Bianchini and Gonzalez (2012) were used. The thermal conductivity, volumetric heat
capacity and latent heat of fusion for each of the soil types for the respective layer are
presented in Table 1 below. The thermal ratio and fusion parameter for each of the soil
types are presented in Table 2 below. The parameters presented in Tables 1 and 2 were
calculated with the following equations from Bianchini and Gonzalez (2012) presented
below.

Thermal conductivity equations:

𝐾𝑓=0.076(10)0.013𝛾𝑑+0.032(10)0.013𝛾𝑑∗𝑢
12

𝐾𝑢=(0.07log⁡(𝑢)+0.04)(10)0.01𝛾𝑑
12

Frost Depth Analysis
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
.

November 7, 2023 3 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

Where:
𝐾𝑢= Thermal Conductivity of unfrozen soil
𝐾𝑓= Thermal Conductivity of frozen soil
𝛾𝑑= soil dry unit weight
𝑣= soil water content as percentage

Volumetric heat capacity equation:

𝐶𝑎𝑢𝑓=𝛾𝑑(𝑐+0.75 𝑣
100)
Where:
𝐶𝑎𝑢𝑓 = Average volumetric heat capacity
𝛾𝑑= soil dry unit weight
𝑣= soil water content as percentage
𝑐= specific heat of the soil solids

Volumetric latent heat of fusion equation:

𝐾=144𝛾𝑑
𝑣
100
Where:
L= Volumetric latent heat of fusion
𝛾𝑑= soil dry unit weight
𝑣= soil water content as percentage

Thermal ratio equation:

𝛼=𝑣0
𝑣𝑠

Where:
𝛼 = Thermal Ratio
𝑣0 =absolute value of the difference between the mean annual temperature below
the ground surface and 32° F.
𝑣𝑠=the term is computed in two different ways in relation to problem analysis.

Term vs equation:

𝑣𝑠=𝑛𝐹
𝑡

Where:
𝑛⁡= conversion factor from air index to surface index
𝐹= air-freezing index
𝑡= length of the freezing season
Frost Depth Analysis
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
.

November 7, 2023 4 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

Fusion parameter equation:

0 =

(+,
Where
C= Volumetric Heat Capacity
L = Volumetric latent heat of fusion

Table 1 – Thermal Properties

Table 2 – Thermal Parameters

Layer
Average
Temperature
(°F)
Freeze
Index
(Degree-
Day)
Duration
(Days) Vs Vo Thermal
Ratio Fusion Parameter
Mulch 48.4 1392.7 123 7.9 16.4 2.08 0.20
Pediment 48.4 1392.7 123 7.9 16.4 2.08 0.20
Sand 48.4 1392.7 123 7.9 16.4 2.08 0.20

· Step 4 Determine 200-year recurrence interval.
NRC, 10 CFR Appendix A to Part 40, Criterion 6, Paragraph 1 states that the design life
should be 1,000 years when reasonably achievable and at a minimum, 200 years. As
discussed in Smith and Rager (2002) the use of a 200-year recurrence interval for frost
depth analysis meets the requirements of 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 40. Mean
annual temperature was calculated for each year in the data set. The mean annual
temperature was plotted and projected to develop the mean minimum temperature for 200
years using the method presented in Smith and Rager (2002). The results of this are
presented in Attachment D3.1.

In addition to the mean annual temperature, the frost index and duration of freeze were
calculated for each year in the data set as stated in Step 1. These data were plotted and
projected to develop the 200-year maximum frost index and duration of freeze using the
method presented in Smith and Rager (2002). The results are presented in Attachments
D3.2 and D3.3, respectively.

Layer Depth
Optimum
Dry
Density
Water
Content
Dry
Density
(85% of
Proctor)
Thermal
Conductivity
Kf
Thermal
Conductivity
Ku
Average
Thermal
Conductivity
(1/2*(
Ku+Kf))
Volumetric
Heat
Capacity
(Cavg)
Latent
Heat of
Fusion
(Inches) (PCF) (%) (PCF) (BTU/ Ft hr °F) (BTU/ Ft hr °F) (BTU/ Ft hr °F) (BTU/ft3 °F) (BTU/ft3)
Mulch 12 119.3 6 101.4 0.62 0.81 0.71 21.8 876.1
Pediment 48 119.3 6 101.4 0.62 0.81 0.71 21.8 876.1
Sand 24 114.6 6 97.4 0.54 0.74 0.64 20.9 841.6
Frost Depth Analysis
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
.

November 7, 2023 5 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

• Step 5 Determine freezing depth.
To determine the frost depth of 200-year recurrence interval the method for manual
solution of the Modberg Equation presented in Bianchini and Gonzalez (2012) was applied
using the parameters calculated in Step 4 to determine the depth of the freezing front inside
of the cover system. The depth of the freezing front is presented in Attachment D4.

3.0 CONCLUSIONS
The frost penetration depth into the final cover for the 200-year recurrence interval was
calculated to be 40 inches. The total thickness of material over the radon barrier is
proposed to be 66 inches. Thus, the radon barrier is not anticipated to experience any
impacts from freezing.

4.0 REFERENCES
Berggren, W.P. (1943). Prediction of temperature distribution in frozen soils. Proceedings of the
11th Annual Western Interstate Snow Survey Conference, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union.
71-77.

Bianchini, A., and C.R. Gonzalez. (2012). Pavement-Transportation Computer Assisted Structural
Engineering (PCASE) Implementation of the Modified Berggren (ModBerg) Equation for
Computing the Frost Penetration Depth within Pavement structures. U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center, Geotechnical and Structures
Laboratory, ERDC/GSL TR-12-15.

Smith, G.E., and R.E. Rager. (2002). Protective layer design in landfill covers based on frost
penetration. ASCE J. Geotechnical/Geoenvironmental Engineering 128(9): 794-799.

U.S. Department of Energy (U.S. DOE). (1989). Technical Approach Document, Revision II,
Uranium M ill Tailings Remedial Action Project, UMTRA-DOE/AL 050425.0002,
Albuquerque, New Mexico.

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure D-1 Final Reclamation Cover System

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

Attachment D1 Historical Temperature Data
Attachment D2 Frost Index Calculations
Attachment D2.1 Cumulative Degree Day Plots
Attachment D2.2 Frost Index Determination
Attachment D3 Determination of Parameters at a 200-year Recurrence Interval
Attachment D3.1 Mean Annual Temperature at 200-year Recurrence Interval
Attachment D3.2 Frost Index at 200-year Recurrence Interval
Attachment D3.3 Duration of Freeze Season at 200-year Recurrence Interval
Attachment D4 Frost Depth Determination
FIGURE

PEDIMENT SOIL LAYER
(BIOINTRUSION AND FROST PROTECTION)
SAND LAYER
(CAPILLARY BREAK)
CLAY LAYER (RADON BARRIER)
INTERIM COVER
TAILINGS
12"
42"
12"
18" MIN.
ROCK MULCH (EROSION PROTECTION)12"
NOT TO SCALE
Project No. 110444 October 2023
FIGURE D-1
FINAL RECLAMATION COVER SYSTEM
SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM FACILITY
Engineering Analytics, Inc.
ATTACHMENT D1
HISTORICAL TEMPERATURE DATA
Shootaring - 110444

Summary of Historical Weather Data
Loca on Site ID Start Date End Date Missing Data? Weather Categories Used Notes
Hanksville, UT 23170 1/1/1973 6/23/2023 · 1/1/2000-
12/31/2004

· 10/1/2012-
7/24/2014
· Temperature
· Rela ve Humidity
· Avg Daily Wind Speed
· Precipita on
· Main data source
· Other data gaps not summarized in
missing data set column filled in with
Grand Junc on, CO data or Page, AZ
data as needed.
Hanksville, UT GHCN_23170
(alterna ve
sta on data)
1/1/2000 4/19/2022 N/A · Temperature · Alterna ve data source
· Used for 1/1/2000-12/31/2004
· Used for various other data gaps
Grand Junc on, CO 23066 1/1/1948 12/31/2019 N/A · Rela ve Humidity
· Precipita on
· Alterna ve data source
· Used for 1/1/2000-12/31/2004
· Used for various other data gaps
Page, AZ 03162 1/1/2006 6/23/2023 N/A · Temperature
· Rela ve Humidity
· Avg Daily Wind Speed
· Precipita on
· Alterna ve data source
· Used for 1/1/2000-12/31/2004 and
10/1/2012-7/24/2014
· Used for various other data gaps

Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
6/1/1973 1973 6 1 1 58 77 67.5 35.5 35.5
6/2/1973 1973 6 2 2 54 75 64.5 32.5 68
6/3/1973 1973 6 3 3 53 72 62.5 30.5 98.5
6/4/1973 1973 6 4 4 44 75 59.5 27.5 126
6/5/1973 1973 6 5 5 39 80 59.5 27.5 153.5
6/6/1973 1973 6 6 6 42 89 65.5 33.5 187
6/7/1973 1973 6 7 7 47 97 72 40 227
6/8/1973 1973 6 8 8 63 98 80.5 48.5 275.5
6/9/1973 1973 6 9 9 53 105 79 47 322.5
6/10/1973 1973 6 10 10 56 100 78 46 368.5
6/11/1973 1973 6 11 11 60 97 78.5 46.5 415
6/12/1973 1973 6 12 12 52 93 72.5 40.5 455.5
6/13/1973 1973 6 13 13 64 78 71 39 494.5
6/14/1973 1973 6 14 14 63 75 69 37 531.5
6/15/1973 1973 6 15 15 54 75 64.5 32.5 564
6/16/1973 1973 6 16 16 42 82 62 30 594
6/17/1973 1973 6 17 17 65 90 77.5 45.5 639.5
6/18/1973 1973 6 18 18 41 72 56.5 24.5 664
6/19/1973 1973 6 19 19 36 75 55.5 23.5 687.5
6/20/1973 1973 6 20 20 37 84 60.5 28.5 716
6/21/1973 1973 6 21 21 46 91 68.5 36.5 752.5
6/22/1973 1973 6 22 22 46 97 71.5 39.5 792
6/23/1973 1973 6 23 23 52 100 76 44 836
6/24/1973 1973 6 24 24 54 99 76.5 44.5 880.5
6/26/1973 1973 6 26 26 76 103 89.5 57.5 938
6/27/1973 1973 6 27 27 60 103 81.5 49.5 987.5
6/28/1973 1973 6 28 28 66 93 79.5 47.5 1035
6/29/1973 1973 6 29 29 54 105 79.5 47.5 1082.5
6/30/1973 1973 6 30 30 55 103 79 47 1129.5
7/1/1973 1973 7 1 31 60 100 80 48 1177.5
7/2/1973 1973 7 2 32 53 100 76.5 44.5 1222
7/3/1973 1973 7 3 33 56 105 80.5 48.5 1270.5
7/4/1973 1973 7 4 34 64 104 84 52 1322.5
7/5/1973 1973 7 5 35 52 106 79 47 1369.5
7/6/1973 1973 7 6 36 65 110 87.5 55.5 1425
7/7/1973 1973 7 7 37 65 83 74 42 1467
7/8/1973 1973 7 8 38 72 93 82.5 50.5 1517.5
7/9/1973 1973 7 9 39 58 100 79 47 1564.5
7/10/1973 1973 7 10 40 57 100 78.5 46.5 1611
7/11/1973 1973 7 11 41 77 100 88.5 56.5 1667.5
7/12/1973 1973 7 12 42 73 90 81.5 49.5 1717
7/13/1973 1973 7 13 43 68 94 81 49 1766
7/14/1973 1973 7 14 44 63 89 76 44 1810
7/15/1973 1973 7 15 45 55 93 74 42 1852
7/16/1973 1973 7 16 46 58 96 77 45 1897
7/17/1973 1973 7 17 47 66 95 80.5 48.5 1945.5
7/18/1973 1973 7 18 48 60 86 73 41 1986.5
7/19/1973 1973 7 19 49 62 85 73.5 41.5 2028
7/20/1973 1973 7 20 50 52 93 72.5 40.5 2068.5
7/21/1973 1973 7 21 51 62 90 76 44 2112.5
7/22/1973 1973 7 22 52 53 92 72.5 40.5 2153
7/23/1973 1973 7 23 53 67 92 79.5 47.5 2200.5
7/24/1973 1973 7 24 54 53 93 73 41 2241.5
7/25/1973 1973 7 25 55 55 92 73.5 41.5 2283
7/26/1973 1973 7 26 56 52 97 74.5 42.5 2325.5
7/27/1973 1973 7 27 57 61 92 76.5 44.5 2370
7/28/1973 1973 7 28 58 54 92 73 41 2411
7/29/1973 1973 7 29 59 55 99 77 45 2456
7/30/1973 1973 7 30 60 69 93 81 49 2505
7/31/1973 1973 7 31 61 53 95 74 42 2547
8/1/1973 1973 8 1 62 52 97 74.5 42.5 2589.5
8/2/1973 1973 8 2 63 53 102 77.5 45.5 2635
8/3/1973 1973 8 3 64 68 100 84 52 2687
8/4/1973 1973 8 4 65 64 90 77 45 2732
8/5/1973 1973 8 5 66 66 88 77 45 2777
8/6/1973 1973 8 6 67 63 88 75.5 43.5 2820.5
8/7/1973 1973 8 7 68 60 94 77 45 2865.5
8/8/1973 1973 8 8 69 63 95 79 47 2912.5
8/9/1973 1973 8 9 70 54 97 75.5 43.5 2956
8/10/1973 1973 8 10 71 56 98 77 45 3001
8/11/1973 1973 8 11 72 56 101 78.5 46.5 3047.5
8/12/1973 1973 8 12 73 54 100 77 45 3092.5
8/13/1973 1973 8 13 74 75 99 87 55 3147.5
8/14/1973 1973 8 14 75 65 100 82.5 50.5 3198
8/15/1973 1973 8 15 76 66 99 82.5 50.5 3248.5
8/16/1973 1973 8 16 77 63 97 80 48 3296.5
8/17/1973 1973 8 17 78 72 89 80.5 48.5 3345
8/18/1973 1973 8 18 79 60 95 77.5 45.5 3390.5
8/19/1973 1973 8 19 80 55 98 76.5 44.5 3435
8/20/1973 1973 8 20 81 69 97 83 51 3486
8/21/1973 1973 8 21 82 63 87 75 43 3529
8/22/1973 1973 8 22 83 53 89 71 39 3568
8/23/1973 1973 8 23 84 58 98 78 46 3614
8/24/1973 1973 8 24 85 75 96 85.5 53.5 3667.5
8/25/1973 1973 8 25 86 68 96 82 50 3717.5
8/26/1973 1973 8 26 87 53 95 74 42 3759.5
8/27/1973 1973 8 27 88 69 96 82.5 50.5 3810
8/28/1973 1973 8 28 89 46 90 68 36 3846
8/29/1973 1973 8 29 90 47 90 68.5 36.5 3882.5
8/30/1973 1973 8 30 91 55 88 71.5 39.5 3922
8/31/1973 1973 8 31 92 57 93 75 43 3965
9/1/1973 1973 9 1 93 60 90 75 43 4008
9/2/1973 1973 9 2 94 35 73 54 22 4030
9/3/1973 1973 9 3 95 39 83 61 29 4059
9/4/1973 1973 9 4 96 40 86 63 31 4090
9/5/1973 1973 9 5 97 39 90 64.5 32.5 4122.5
9/6/1973 1973 9 6 98 65 95 80 48 4170.5
9/7/1973 1973 9 7 99 46 95 70.5 38.5 4209
9/8/1973 1973 9 8 100 57 78 67.5 35.5 4244.5
9/9/1973 1973 9 9 101 53 85 69 37 4281.5
9/10/1973 1973 9 10 102 52 79 65.5 33.5 4315
9/11/1973 1973 9 11 103 49 72 60.5 28.5 4343.5
9/12/1973 1973 9 12 104 45 87 66 34 4377.5
9/13/1973 1973 9 13 105 45 92 68.5 36.5 4414
9/14/1973 1973 9 14 106 52 96 74 42 4456
9/15/1973 1973 9 15 107 50 90 70 38 4494
9/16/1973 1973 9 16 108 54 92 73 41 4535
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
9/17/1973 1973 9 17 109 41 90 65.5 33.5 4568.5
9/18/1973 1973 9 18 110 44 98 71 39 4607.5
9/19/1973 1973 9 19 111 42 91 66.5 34.5 4642
9/20/1973 1973 9 20 112 45 92 68.5 36.5 4678.5
9/21/1973 1973 9 21 113 58 81 69.5 37.5 4716
9/22/1973 1973 9 22 114 42 90 66 34 4750
9/23/1973 1973 9 23 115 67 79 73 41 4791
9/24/1973 1973 9 24 116 33 76 54.5 22.5 4813.5
9/25/1973 1973 9 25 117 47 67 57 25 4838.5
9/26/1973 1973 9 26 118 32 68 50 18 4856.5
9/27/1973 1973 9 27 119 30 73 51.5 19.5 4876
9/28/1973 1973 9 28 120 32 80 56 24 4900
9/29/1973 1973 9 29 121 40 82 61 29 4929
9/30/1973 1973 9 30 122 37 85 61 29 4958
10/1/1973 1973 10 1 123 36 90 63 31 4989
10/2/1973 1973 10 2 124 42 89 65.5 33.5 5022.5
10/3/1973 1973 10 3 125 46 80 63 31 5053.5
10/4/1973 1973 10 4 126 34 75 54.5 22.5 5076
10/5/1973 1973 10 5 127 32 84 58 26 5102
10/6/1973 1973 10 6 128 42 82 62 30 5132
10/7/1973 1973 10 7 129 63 82 72.5 40.5 5172.5
10/8/1973 1973 10 8 130 56 75 65.5 33.5 5206
10/9/1973 1973 10 9 131 45 51 48 16 5222
10/10/1973 1973 10 10 132 40 58 49 17 5239
10/11/1973 1973 10 11 133 33 61 47 15 5254
10/12/1973 1973 10 12 134 28 68 48 16 5270
10/13/1973 1973 10 13 135 29 70 49.5 17.5 5287.5
10/14/1973 1973 10 14 136 30 74 52 20 5307.5
10/15/1973 1973 10 15 137 30 80 55 23 5330.5
10/16/1973 1973 10 16 138 34 81 57.5 25.5 5356
10/17/1973 1973 10 17 139 30 80 55 23 5379
10/18/1973 1973 10 18 140 32 80 56 24 5403
10/19/1973 1973 10 19 141 32 80 56 24 5427
10/20/1973 1973 10 20 142 38 79 58.5 26.5 5453.5
10/21/1973 1973 10 21 143 35 66 50.5 18.5 5472
10/22/1973 1973 10 22 144 34 83 58.5 26.5 5498.5
10/23/1973 1973 10 23 145 51 82 66.5 34.5 5533
10/24/1973 1973 10 24 146 26 65 45.5 13.5 5546.5
10/25/1973 1973 10 25 147 25 64 44.5 12.5 5559
10/26/1973 1973 10 26 148 29 70 49.5 17.5 5576.5
10/27/1973 1973 10 27 149 22 69 45.5 13.5 5590
10/28/1973 1973 10 28 150 25 68 46.5 14.5 5604.5
10/29/1973 1973 10 29 151 26 54 40 8 5612.5
10/30/1973 1973 10 30 152 29 64 46.5 14.5 5627
10/31/1973 1973 10 31 153 35 74 54.5 22.5 5649.5
11/1/1973 1973 11 1 154 40 72 56 24 5673.5
11/2/1973 1973 11 2 155 24 64 44 12 5685.5
11/3/1973 1973 11 3 156 39 64 51.5 19.5 5705
11/4/1973 1973 11 4 157 20 55 37.5 5.5 5710.5
11/5/1973 1973 11 5 158 31 62 46.5 14.5 5725
11/6/1973 1973 11 6 159 32 73 52.5 20.5 5745.5
11/7/1973 1973 11 7 160 28 73 50.5 18.5 5764
11/8/1973 1973 11 8 161 28 65 46.5 14.5 5778.5
11/9/1973 1973 11 9 162 26 68 47 15 5793.5
11/10/1973 1973 11 10 163 35 67 51 19 5812.5
11/11/1973 1973 11 11 164 29 66 47.5 15.5 5828
11/12/1973 1973 11 12 165 40 76 58 26 5854
11/13/1973 1973 11 13 166 40 70 55 23 5877
11/14/1973 1973 11 14 167 27 59 43 11 5888
11/15/1973 1973 11 15 168 21 53 37 5 5893
11/16/1973 1973 11 16 169 15 54 34.5 2.5 5895.5
11/17/1973 1973 11 17 170 20 62 41 9 5904.5
11/18/1973 1973 11 18 171 40 55 47.5 15.5 5920
11/19/1973 1973 11 19 172 35 45 40 8 5928
11/20/1973 1973 11 20 173 23 47 35 3 5931
11/21/1973 1973 11 21 174 21 45 33 1 5932
11/22/1973 1973 11 22 175 18 33 25.5 -6.5 5925.5
11/23/1973 1973 11 23 176 24 36 30 -2 5923.5
11/24/1973 1973 11 24 177 24 40 32 0 5923.5
11/25/1973 1973 11 25 178 13 37 25 -7 5916.5
11/26/1973 1973 11 26 179 26 44 35 3 5919.5
11/27/1973 1973 11 27 180 16 44 30 -2 5917.5
11/28/1973 1973 11 28 181 14 42 28 -4 5913.5
11/29/1973 1973 11 29 182 13 38 25.5 -6.5 5907
11/30/1973 1973 11 30 183 18 45 31.5 -0.5 5906.5
12/1/1973 1973 12 1 184 16 50 33 1 5907.5
12/2/1973 1973 12 2 185 34 40 37 5 5912.5
12/3/1973 1973 12 3 186 22 42 32 0 5912.5
12/4/1973 1973 12 4 187 17 43 30 -2 5910.5
12/5/1973 1973 12 5 188 17 38 27.5 -4.5 5906
12/6/1973 1973 12 6 189 11 24 17.5 -14.5 5891.5
12/7/1973 1973 12 7 190 12 42 27 -5 5886.5
12/8/1973 1973 12 8 191 12 47 29.5 -2.5 5884
12/9/1973 1973 12 9 192 12 47 29.5 -2.5 5881.5
12/10/1973 1973 12 10 193 10 31 20.5 -11.5 5870
12/11/1973 1973 12 11 194 12 43 27.5 -4.5 5865.5
12/12/1973 1973 12 12 195 14 48 31 -1 5864.5
12/13/1973 1973 12 13 196 28 41 34.5 2.5 5867
12/14/1973 1973 12 14 197 20 48 34 2 5869
12/15/1973 1973 12 15 198 12 46 29 -3 5866
12/16/1973 1973 12 16 199 13 44 28.5 -3.5 5862.5
12/17/1973 1973 12 17 200 14 42 28 -4 5858.5
12/18/1973 1973 12 18 201 37 46 41.5 9.5 5868
12/19/1973 1973 12 19 202 15 30 22.5 -9.5 5858.5
12/20/1973 1973 12 20 203 7 41 24 -8 5850.5
12/21/1973 1973 12 21 204 5 36 20.5 -11.5 5839
12/22/1973 1973 12 22 205 18 36 27 -5 5834
12/23/1973 1973 12 23 206 16 48 32 0 5834
12/24/1973 1973 12 24 207 15 44 29.5 -2.5 5831.5
12/25/1973 1973 12 25 208 20 45 32.5 0.5 5832
12/26/1973 1973 12 26 209 3 40 21.5 -10.5 5821.5
12/27/1973 1973 12 27 210 18 39 28.5 -3.5 5818
12/28/1973 1973 12 28 211 18 58 38 6 5824
12/29/1973 1973 12 29 212 20 55 37.5 5.5 5829.5
12/30/1973 1973 12 30 213 25 37 31 -1 5828.5
12/31/1973 1973 12 31 214 15 29 22 -10 5818.5
1/1/1974 1974 1 1 215 15 28 21.5 -10.5 5808
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
1/2/1974 1974 1 2 216 -17 19 1 -31 5777
1/3/1974 1974 1 3 217 -25 14 -5.5 -37.5 5739.5
1/4/1974 1974 1 4 218 -20 21 0.5 -31.5 5708
1/5/1974 1974 1 5 219 -5 28 11.5 -20.5 5687.5
1/6/1974 1974 1 6 220 3 34 18.5 -13.5 5674
1/7/1974 1974 1 7 221 5 37 21 -11 5663
1/8/1974 1974 1 8 222 30 42 36 4 5667
1/9/1974 1974 1 9 223 17 38 27.5 -4.5 5662.5
1/10/1974 1974 1 10 224 3 30 16.5 -15.5 5647
1/11/1974 1974 1 11 225 -10 27 8.5 -23.5 5623.5
1/12/1974 1974 1 12 226 17 29 23 -9 5614.5
1/13/1974 1974 1 13 227 28 39 33.5 1.5 5616
1/14/1974 1974 1 14 228 28 33 30.5 -1.5 5614.5
1/15/1974 1974 1 15 229 27 36 31.5 -0.5 5614
1/16/1974 1974 1 16 230 28 33 30.5 -1.5 5612.5
1/17/1974 1974 1 17 231 13 38 25.5 -6.5 5606
1/18/1974 1974 1 18 232 17 30 23.5 -8.5 5597.5
1/19/1974 1974 1 19 233 18 32 25 -7 5590.5
1/20/1974 1974 1 20 234 23 29 26 -6 5584.5
1/21/1974 1974 1 21 235 19 40 29.5 -2.5 5582
1/22/1974 1974 1 22 236 -12 29 8.5 -23.5 5558.5
1/23/1974 1974 1 23 237 -3 35 16 -16 5542.5
1/24/1974 1974 1 24 238 -9 31 11 -21 5521.5
1/25/1974 1974 1 25 239 -10 23 6.5 -25.5 5496
1/26/1974 1974 1 26 240 0 30 15 -17 5479
1/27/1974 1974 1 27 241 1 26 13.5 -18.5 5460.5
1/28/1974 1974 1 28 242 0 29 14.5 -17.5 5443
1/29/1974 1974 1 29 243 -5 26 10.5 -21.5 5421.5
1/30/1974 1974 1 30 244 20 27 23.5 -8.5 5413
1/31/1974 1974 1 31 245 18 27 22.5 -9.5 5403.5
2/1/1974 1974 2 1 246 7 36 21.5 -10.5 5393
2/2/1974 1974 2 2 247 10 43 26.5 -5.5 5387.5
2/3/1974 1974 2 3 248 2 28 15 -17 5370.5
2/4/1974 1974 2 4 249 1 32 16.5 -15.5 5355
2/5/1974 1974 2 5 250 8 37 22.5 -9.5 5345.5
2/6/1974 1974 2 6 251 -1 40 19.5 -12.5 5333
2/7/1974 1974 2 7 252 13 34 23.5 -8.5 5324.5
2/8/1974 1974 2 8 253 -3 30 13.5 -18.5 5306
2/9/1974 1974 2 9 254 -5 28 11.5 -20.5 5285.5
2/10/1974 1974 2 10 255 -3 35 16 -16 5269.5
2/11/1974 1974 2 11 256 -3 30 13.5 -18.5 5251
2/12/1974 1974 2 12 257 -3 35 16 -16 5235
2/13/1974 1974 2 13 258 8 35 21.5 -10.5 5224.5
2/14/1974 1974 2 14 259 1 40 20.5 -11.5 5213
2/15/1974 1974 2 15 260 9 40 24.5 -7.5 5205.5
2/16/1974 1974 2 16 261 9 40 24.5 -7.5 5198
2/17/1974 1974 2 17 262 15 36 25.5 -6.5 5191.5
2/18/1974 1974 2 18 263 6 42 24 -8 5183.5
2/19/1974 1974 2 19 264 20 42 31 -1 5182.5
2/20/1974 1974 2 20 265 27 40 33.5 1.5 5184
2/21/1974 1974 2 21 266 13 43 28 -4 5180
2/22/1974 1974 2 22 267 18 36 27 -5 5175
2/23/1974 1974 2 23 268 19 37 28 -4 5171
2/24/1974 1974 2 24 269 6 34 20 -12 5159
2/25/1974 1974 2 25 270 8 36 22 -10 5149
2/26/1974 1974 2 26 271 10 40 25 -7 5142
2/27/1974 1974 2 27 272 20 48 34 2 5144
2/28/1974 1974 2 28 273 21 50 35.5 3.5 5147.5
3/1/1974 1974 3 1 274 38 68 53 21 5168.5
3/2/1974 1974 3 2 275 37 64 50.5 18.5 5187
3/3/1974 1974 3 3 276 22 50 36 4 5191
3/4/1974 1974 3 4 277 22 48 35 3 5194
3/5/1974 1974 3 5 278 18 55 36.5 4.5 5198.5
3/6/1974 1974 3 6 279 24 67 45.5 13.5 5212
3/7/1974 1974 3 7 280 32 63 47.5 15.5 5227.5
3/8/1974 1974 3 8 281 41 60 50.5 18.5 5246
3/9/1974 1974 3 9 282 38 60 49 17 5263
3/10/1974 1974 3 10 283 33 58 45.5 13.5 5276.5
3/11/1974 1974 3 11 284 30 60 45 13 5289.5
3/12/1974 1974 3 12 285 28 65 46.5 14.5 5304
3/13/1974 1974 3 13 286 31 73 52 20 5324
3/14/1974 1974 3 14 287 34 70 52 20 5344
3/15/1974 1974 3 15 288 34 74 54 22 5366
3/16/1974 1974 3 16 289 34 75 54.5 22.5 5388.5
3/17/1974 1974 3 17 290 40 80 60 28 5416.5
3/18/1974 1974 3 18 291 50 70 60 28 5444.5
3/19/1974 1974 3 19 292 42 64 53 21 5465.5
3/20/1974 1974 3 20 293 42 57 49.5 17.5 5483
3/21/1974 1974 3 21 294 19 62 40.5 8.5 5491.5
3/22/1974 1974 3 22 295 22 65 43.5 11.5 5503
3/23/1974 1974 3 23 296 40 60 50 18 5521
3/24/1974 1974 3 24 297 25 65 45 13 5534
3/25/1974 1974 3 25 298 25 74 49.5 17.5 5551.5
3/26/1974 1974 3 26 299 48 69 58.5 26.5 5578
3/27/1974 1974 3 27 300 41 70 55.5 23.5 5601.5
3/28/1974 1974 3 28 301 50 64 57 25 5626.5
3/29/1974 1974 3 29 302 27 75 51 19 5645.5
3/30/1974 1974 3 30 303 42 75 58.5 26.5 5672
3/31/1974 1974 3 31 304 36 58 47 15 5687
4/1/1974 1974 4 1 305 21 62 41.5 9.5 5696.5
4/2/1974 1974 4 2 306 36 53 44.5 12.5 5709
4/3/1974 1974 4 3 307 34 52 43 11 5720
4/4/1974 1974 4 4 308 32 56 44 12 5732
4/5/1974 1974 4 5 309 22 63 42.5 10.5 5742.5
4/6/1974 1974 4 6 310 28 68 48 16 5758.5
4/7/1974 1974 4 7 311 32 62 47 15 5773.5
4/8/1974 1974 4 8 312 23 70 46.5 14.5 5788
4/9/1974 1974 4 9 313 36 75 55.5 23.5 5811.5
4/10/1974 1974 4 10 314 32 55 43.5 11.5 5823
4/11/1974 1974 4 11 315 38 62 50 18 5841
4/12/1974 1974 4 12 316 31 63 47 15 5856
4/13/1974 1974 4 13 317 32 56 44 12 5868
4/14/1974 1974 4 14 318 25 61 43 11 5879
4/15/1974 1974 4 15 319 25 65 45 13 5892
4/16/1974 1974 4 16 320 26 70 48 16 5908
4/17/1974 1974 4 17 321 33 76 54.5 22.5 5930.5
4/18/1974 1974 4 18 322 33 76 54.5 22.5 5953
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
4/19/1974 1974 4 19 323 35 61 48 16 5969
4/20/1974 1974 4 20 324 34 62 48 16 5985
4/21/1974 1974 4 21 325 34 64 49 17 6002
4/22/1974 1974 4 22 326 38 75 56.5 24.5 6026.5
4/23/1974 1974 4 23 327 42 81 61.5 29.5 6056
4/24/1974 1974 4 24 328 46 77 61.5 29.5 6085.5
4/25/1974 1974 4 25 329 49 85 67 35 6120.5
4/26/1974 1974 4 26 330 49 72 60.5 28.5 6149
4/27/1974 1974 4 27 331 35 65 50 18 6167
4/28/1974 1974 4 28 332 34 67 50.5 18.5 6185.5
4/29/1974 1974 4 29 333 42 68 55 23 6208.5
4/30/1974 1974 4 30 334 36 73 54.5 22.5 6231
5/1/1974 1974 5 1 335 36 84 60 28 6259
5/2/1974 1974 5 2 336 64 87 75.5 43.5 6302.5
5/3/1974 1974 5 3 337 38 83 60.5 28.5 6331
5/4/1974 1974 5 4 338 46 80 63 31 6362
5/5/1974 1974 5 5 339 42 84 63 31 6393
5/6/1974 1974 5 6 340 50 82 66 34 6427
5/7/1974 1974 5 7 341 45 87 66 34 6461
5/8/1974 1974 5 8 342 48 90 69 37 6498
5/9/1974 1974 5 9 343 55 93 74 42 6540
5/10/1974 1974 5 10 344 58 87 72.5 40.5 6580.5
5/11/1974 1974 5 11 345 42 89 65.5 33.5 6614
5/12/1974 1974 5 12 346 41 90 65.5 33.5 6647.5
5/13/1974 1974 5 13 347 57 72 64.5 32.5 6680
5/14/1974 1974 5 14 348 48 81 64.5 32.5 6712.5
5/15/1974 1974 5 15 349 68 91 79.5 47.5 6760
5/16/1974 1974 5 16 350 65 87 76 44 6804
5/17/1974 1974 5 17 351 63 80 71.5 39.5 6843.5
5/18/1974 1974 5 18 352 58 85 71.5 39.5 6883
5/19/1974 1974 5 19 353 48 78 63 31 6914
5/20/1974 1974 5 20 354 43 67 55 23 6937
5/21/1974 1974 5 21 355 32 75 53.5 21.5 6958.5
5/22/1974 1974 5 22 356 42 82 62 30 6988.5
5/23/1974 1974 5 23 357 42 85 63.5 31.5 7020
5/24/1974 1974 5 24 358 52 84 68 36 7056
5/25/1974 1974 5 25 359 44 90 67 35 7091
5/26/1974 1974 5 26 360 49 90 69.5 37.5 7128.5
5/27/1974 1974 5 27 361 50 93 71.5 39.5 7168
5/28/1974 1974 5 28 362 58 93 75.5 43.5 7211.5
5/29/1974 1974 5 29 363 69 91 80 48 7259.5
5/30/1974 1974 5 30 364 53 91 72 40 7299.5
5/31/1974 1974 5 31 365 47 93 70 38 7337.5
6/1/1974 1974 6 1 1 48 87 67.5 35.5 35.5
6/2/1974 1974 6 2 2 46 89 67.5 35.5 71
6/3/1974 1974 6 3 3 48 91 69.5 37.5 108.5
6/4/1974 1974 6 4 4 53 88 70.5 38.5 147
6/5/1974 1974 6 5 5 65 82 73.5 41.5 188.5
6/6/1974 1974 6 6 6 48 78 63 31 219.5
6/7/1974 1974 6 7 7 44 82 63 31 250.5
6/8/1974 1974 6 8 8 51 71 61 29 279.5
6/9/1974 1974 6 9 9 40 83 61.5 29.5 309
6/10/1974 1974 6 10 10 42 94 68 36 345
6/11/1974 1974 6 11 11 48 94 71 39 384
6/12/1974 1974 6 12 12 48 100 74 42 426
6/13/1974 1974 6 13 13 51 107 79 47 473
6/14/1974 1974 6 14 14 66 103 84.5 52.5 525.5
6/15/1974 1974 6 15 15 57 100 78.5 46.5 572
6/16/1974 1974 6 16 16 64 100 82 50 622
6/17/1974 1974 6 17 17 63 100 81.5 49.5 671.5
6/18/1974 1974 6 18 18 60 98 79 47 718.5
6/19/1974 1974 6 19 19 57 97 77 45 763.5
6/20/1974 1974 6 20 20 76 102 89 57 820.5
6/21/1974 1974 6 21 21 51 100 75.5 43.5 864
6/22/1974 1974 6 22 22 56 102 79 47 911
6/23/1974 1974 6 23 23 65 105 85 53 964
6/24/1974 1974 6 24 24 57 105 81 49 1013
6/25/1974 1974 6 25 25 65 103 84 52 1065
6/26/1974 1974 6 26 26 76 105 90.5 58.5 1123.5
6/27/1974 1974 6 27 27 55 105 80 48 1171.5
6/28/1974 1974 6 28 28 57 102 79.5 47.5 1219
6/29/1974 1974 6 29 29 60 106 83 51 1270
6/30/1974 1974 6 30 30 58 102 80 48 1318
7/1/1974 1974 7 1 31 55 99 77 45 1363
7/2/1974 1974 7 2 32 72 98 85 53 1416
7/3/1974 1974 7 3 33 62 100 81 49 1465
7/4/1974 1974 7 4 34 52 98 75 43 1508
7/5/1974 1974 7 5 35 60 102 81 49 1557
7/6/1974 1974 7 6 36 69 86 77.5 45.5 1602.5
7/7/1974 1974 7 7 37 68 95 81.5 49.5 1652
7/8/1974 1974 7 8 38 63 95 79 47 1699
7/9/1974 1974 7 9 39 62 98 80 48 1747
7/10/1974 1974 7 10 40 60 95 77.5 45.5 1792.5
7/11/1974 1974 7 11 41 65 95 80 48 1840.5
7/12/1974 1974 7 12 42 52 98 75 43 1883.5
7/13/1974 1974 7 13 43 58 100 79 47 1930.5
7/14/1974 1974 7 14 44 75 97 86 54 1984.5
7/15/1974 1974 7 15 45 68 80 74 42 2026.5
7/16/1974 1974 7 16 46 60 90 75 43 2069.5
7/17/1974 1974 7 17 47 67 88 77.5 45.5 2115
7/18/1974 1974 7 18 48 62 94 78 46 2161
7/19/1974 1974 7 19 49 65 89 77 45 2206
7/20/1974 1974 7 20 50 68 91 79.5 47.5 2253.5
7/21/1974 1974 7 21 51 66 92 79 47 2300.5
7/22/1974 1974 7 22 52 70 85 77.5 45.5 2346
7/23/1974 1974 7 23 53 60 95 77.5 45.5 2391.5
7/24/1974 1974 7 24 54 62 100 81 49 2440.5
7/25/1974 1974 7 25 55 68 100 84 52 2492.5
7/26/1974 1974 7 26 56 61 97 79 47 2539.5
7/27/1974 1974 7 27 57 64 101 82.5 50.5 2590
7/28/1974 1974 7 28 58 78 100 89 57 2647
7/29/1974 1974 7 29 59 58 98 78 46 2693
7/30/1974 1974 7 30 60 58 102 80 48 2741
7/31/1974 1974 7 31 61 62 93 77.5 45.5 2786.5
8/1/1974 1974 8 1 62 63 95 79 47 2833.5
8/2/1974 1974 8 2 63 62 92 77 45 2878.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
8/3/1974 1974 8 3 64 57 90 73.5 41.5 2920
8/4/1974 1974 8 4 65 57 95 76 44 2964
8/5/1974 1974 8 5 66 54 95 74.5 42.5 3006.5
8/6/1974 1974 8 6 67 58 99 78.5 46.5 3053
8/7/1974 1974 8 7 68 61 88 74.5 42.5 3095.5
8/8/1974 1974 8 8 69 65 92 78.5 46.5 3142
8/9/1974 1974 8 9 70 64 87 75.5 43.5 3185.5
8/10/1974 1974 8 10 71 48 82 65 33 3218.5
8/11/1974 1974 8 11 72 48 97 72.5 40.5 3259
8/12/1974 1974 8 12 73 52 100 76 44 3303
8/13/1974 1974 8 13 74 55 98 76.5 44.5 3347.5
8/14/1974 1974 8 14 75 58 95 76.5 44.5 3392
8/15/1974 1974 8 15 76 52 95 73.5 41.5 3433.5
8/16/1974 1974 8 16 77 55 98 76.5 44.5 3478
8/17/1974 1974 8 17 78 56 97 76.5 44.5 3522.5
8/18/1974 1974 8 18 79 52 103 77.5 45.5 3568
8/19/1974 1974 8 19 80 73 96 84.5 52.5 3620.5
8/20/1974 1974 8 20 81 56 88 72 40 3660.5
8/21/1974 1974 8 21 82 45 89 67 35 3695.5
8/22/1974 1974 8 22 83 44 96 70 38 3733.5
8/23/1974 1974 8 23 84 45 97 71 39 3772.5
8/24/1974 1974 8 24 85 49 99 74 42 3814.5
8/25/1974 1974 8 25 86 49 101 75 43 3857.5
8/26/1974 1974 8 26 87 50 102 76 44 3901.5
8/27/1974 1974 8 27 88 55 79 67 35 3936.5
8/28/1974 1974 8 28 89 53 97 75 43 3979.5
8/29/1974 1974 8 29 90 55 100 77.5 45.5 4025
8/30/1974 1974 8 30 91 53 101 77 45 4070
8/31/1974 1974 8 31 92 53 104 78.5 46.5 4116.5
9/1/1974 1974 9 1 93 51 96 73.5 41.5 4158
9/2/1974 1974 9 2 94 52 94 73 41 4199
9/3/1974 1974 9 3 95 48 95 71.5 39.5 4238.5
9/4/1974 1974 9 4 96 49 97 73 41 4279.5
9/5/1974 1974 9 5 97 53 96 74.5 42.5 4322
9/6/1974 1974 9 6 98 47 95 71 39 4361
9/7/1974 1974 9 7 99 48 96 72 40 4401
9/8/1974 1974 9 8 100 54 98 76 44 4445
9/9/1974 1974 9 9 101 53 103 78 46 4491
9/10/1974 1974 9 10 102 53 99 76 44 4535
9/11/1974 1974 9 11 103 58 97 77.5 45.5 4580.5
9/12/1974 1974 9 12 104 38 72 55 23 4603.5
9/13/1974 1974 9 13 105 38 75 56.5 24.5 4628
9/14/1974 1974 9 14 106 44 73 58.5 26.5 4654.5
9/15/1974 1974 9 15 107 45 65 55 23 4677.5
9/16/1974 1974 9 16 108 46 73 59.5 27.5 4705
9/17/1974 1974 9 17 109 44 84 64 32 4737
9/18/1974 1974 9 18 110 43 80 61.5 29.5 4766.5
9/19/1974 1974 9 19 111 44 87 65.5 33.5 4800
9/20/1974 1974 9 20 112 45 88 66.5 34.5 4834.5
9/21/1974 1974 9 21 113 59 84 71.5 39.5 4874
9/22/1974 1974 9 22 114 48 84 66 34 4908
9/23/1974 1974 9 23 115 48 85 66.5 34.5 4942.5
9/24/1974 1974 9 24 116 43 90 66.5 34.5 4977
9/25/1974 1974 9 25 117 52 77 64.5 32.5 5009.5
9/26/1974 1974 9 26 118 40 83 61.5 29.5 5039
9/27/1974 1974 9 27 119 42 65 53.5 21.5 5060.5
9/28/1974 1974 9 28 120 30 75 52.5 20.5 5081
9/29/1974 1974 9 29 121 29 78 53.5 21.5 5102.5
9/30/1974 1974 9 30 122 28 82 55 23 5125.5
10/1/1974 1974 10 1 123 32 72 52 20 5145.5
10/2/1974 1974 10 2 124 34 87 60.5 28.5 5174
10/3/1974 1974 10 3 125 46 65 55.5 23.5 5197.5
10/4/1974 1974 10 4 126 40 73 56.5 24.5 5222
10/5/1974 1974 10 5 127 40 60 50 18 5240
10/6/1974 1974 10 6 128 35 71 53 21 5261
10/7/1974 1974 10 7 129 35 75 55 23 5284
10/8/1974 1974 10 8 130 38 80 59 27 5311
10/9/1974 1974 10 9 131 45 84 64.5 32.5 5343.5
10/10/1974 1974 10 10 132 45 77 61 29 5372.5
10/11/1974 1974 10 11 133 43 76 59.5 27.5 5400
10/12/1974 1974 10 12 134 46 70 58 26 5426
10/13/1974 1974 10 13 135 35 73 54 22 5448
10/14/1974 1974 10 14 136 33 75 54 22 5470
10/15/1974 1974 10 15 137 29 73 51 19 5489
10/16/1974 1974 10 16 138 30 77 53.5 21.5 5510.5
10/17/1974 1974 10 17 139 31 80 55.5 23.5 5534
10/18/1974 1974 10 18 140 33 80 56.5 24.5 5558.5
10/19/1974 1974 10 19 141 33 83 58 26 5584.5
10/20/1974 1974 10 20 142 33 83 58 26 5610.5
10/21/1974 1974 10 21 143 60 80 70 38 5648.5
10/22/1974 1974 10 22 144 52 67 59.5 27.5 5676
10/23/1974 1974 10 23 145 46 58 52 20 5696
10/24/1974 1974 10 24 146 48 62 55 23 5719
10/30/1974 1974 10 30 152 29 56 42.5 10.5 5729.5
10/31/1974 1974 10 31 153 35 60 47.5 15.5 5745
11/1/1974 1974 11 1 154 37 48 42.5 10.5 5755.5
11/2/1974 1974 11 2 155 39 51 45 13 5768.5
11/3/1974 1974 11 3 156 35 47 41 9 5777.5
11/4/1974 1974 11 4 157 36 50 43 11 5788.5
11/5/1974 1974 11 5 158 31 58 44.5 12.5 5801
11/6/1974 1974 11 6 159 32 53 42.5 10.5 5811.5
11/7/1974 1974 11 7 160 27 54 40.5 8.5 5820
11/8/1974 1974 11 8 161 30 53 41.5 9.5 5829.5
11/9/1974 1974 11 9 162 35 56 45.5 13.5 5843
11/10/1974 1974 11 10 163 28 59 43.5 11.5 5854.5
11/11/1974 1974 11 11 164 26 55 40.5 8.5 5863
11/12/1974 1974 11 12 165 25 52 38.5 6.5 5869.5
11/13/1974 1974 11 13 166 27 58 42.5 10.5 5880
11/14/1974 1974 11 14 167 27 54 40.5 8.5 5888.5
11/15/1974 1974 11 15 168 31 58 44.5 12.5 5901
11/16/1974 1974 11 16 169 24 57 40.5 8.5 5909.5
11/17/1974 1974 11 17 170 26 56 41 9 5918.5
11/18/1974 1974 11 18 171 26 62 44 12 5930.5
11/19/1974 1974 11 19 172 26 35 30.5 -1.5 5929
11/20/1974 1974 11 20 173 20 52 36 4 5933
11/21/1974 1974 11 21 174 21 55 38 6 5939
11/22/1974 1974 11 22 175 26 55 40.5 8.5 5947.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
11/23/1974 1974 11 23 176 26 56 41 9 5956.5
11/24/1974 1974 11 24 177 18 52 35 3 5959.5
11/25/1974 1974 11 25 178 18 52 35 3 5962.5
11/26/1974 1974 11 26 179 17 52 34.5 2.5 5965
11/27/1974 1974 11 27 180 14 47 30.5 -1.5 5963.5
11/28/1974 1974 11 28 181 24 48 36 4 5967.5
11/29/1974 1974 11 29 182 12 44 28 -4 5963.5
11/30/1974 1974 11 30 183 9 43 26 -6 5957.5
12/1/1974 1974 12 1 184 8 42 25 -7 5950.5
12/2/1974 1974 12 2 185 15 47 31 -1 5949.5
12/3/1974 1974 12 3 186 12 41 26.5 -5.5 5944
12/4/1974 1974 12 4 187 19 40 29.5 -2.5 5941.5
12/5/1974 1974 12 5 188 28 50 39 7 5948.5
12/6/1974 1974 12 6 189 17 52 34.5 2.5 5951
12/7/1974 1974 12 7 190 24 35 29.5 -2.5 5948.5
12/8/1974 1974 12 8 191 14 45 29.5 -2.5 5946
12/9/1974 1974 12 9 192 7 44 25.5 -6.5 5939.5
12/10/1974 1974 12 10 193 5 40 22.5 -9.5 5930
12/11/1974 1974 12 11 194 8 45 26.5 -5.5 5924.5
12/12/1974 1974 12 12 195 10 46 28 -4 5920.5
12/13/1974 1974 12 13 196 28 40 34 2 5922.5
12/14/1974 1974 12 14 197 21 43 32 0 5922.5
12/15/1974 1974 12 15 198 15 39 27 -5 5917.5
12/16/1974 1974 12 16 199 13 50 31.5 -0.5 5917
12/17/1974 1974 12 17 200 12 45 28.5 -3.5 5913.5
12/18/1974 1974 12 18 201 8 42 25 -7 5906.5
12/19/1974 1974 12 19 202 15 50 32.5 0.5 5907
12/20/1974 1974 12 20 203 17 54 35.5 3.5 5910.5
12/21/1974 1974 12 21 204 18 50 34 2 5912.5
12/22/1974 1974 12 22 205 25 35 30 -2 5910.5
12/23/1974 1974 12 23 206 13 28 20.5 -11.5 5899
12/24/1974 1974 12 24 207 0 29 14.5 -17.5 5881.5
12/25/1974 1974 12 25 208 -3 30 13.5 -18.5 5863
12/26/1974 1974 12 26 209 14 34 24 -8 5855
12/27/1974 1974 12 27 210 15 30 22.5 -9.5 5845.5
12/28/1974 1974 12 28 211 18 37 27.5 -4.5 5841
12/29/1974 1974 12 29 212 22 40 31 -1 5840
12/30/1974 1974 12 30 213 20 31 25.5 -6.5 5833.5
12/31/1974 1974 12 31 214 22 36 29 -3 5830.5
1/1/1975 1975 1 1 215 -2 31 14.5 -17.5 5813
1/2/1975 1975 1 2 216 -2 30 14 -18 5795
1/3/1975 1975 1 3 217 -5 30 12.5 -19.5 5775.5
1/4/1975 1975 1 4 218 -3 24 10.5 -21.5 5754
1/5/1975 1975 1 5 219 -3 30 13.5 -18.5 5735.5
1/6/1975 1975 1 6 220 3 28 15.5 -16.5 5719
1/7/1975 1975 1 7 221 9 33 21 -11 5708
1/8/1975 1975 1 8 222 17 43 30 -2 5706
1/9/1975 1975 1 9 223 20 39 29.5 -2.5 5703.5
1/10/1975 1975 1 10 224 10 33 21.5 -10.5 5693
1/11/1975 1975 1 11 225 13 30 21.5 -10.5 5682.5
1/12/1975 1975 1 12 226 1 23 12 -20 5662.5
1/13/1975 1975 1 13 227 0 30 15 -17 5645.5
1/14/1975 1975 1 14 228 0 30 15 -17 5628.5
1/15/1975 1975 1 15 229 -1 32 15.5 -16.5 5612
1/16/1975 1975 1 16 230 11 33 22 -10 5602
1/17/1975 1975 1 17 231 7 35 21 -11 5591
1/18/1975 1975 1 18 232 8 40 24 -8 5583
1/19/1975 1975 1 19 233 8 44 26 -6 5577
1/20/1975 1975 1 20 234 9 40 24.5 -7.5 5569.5
1/21/1975 1975 1 21 235 12 42 27 -5 5564.5
1/22/1975 1975 1 22 236 5 38 21.5 -10.5 5554
1/23/1975 1975 1 23 237 9 40 24.5 -7.5 5546.5
1/24/1975 1975 1 24 238 12 50 31 -1 5545.5
1/25/1975 1975 1 25 239 16 60 38 6 5551.5
1/26/1975 1975 1 26 240 18 67 42.5 10.5 5562
1/27/1975 1975 1 27 241 18 40 29 -3 5559
1/28/1975 1975 1 28 242 18 42 30 -2 5557
1/29/1975 1975 1 29 243 13 37 25 -7 5550
1/30/1975 1975 1 30 244 22 33 27.5 -4.5 5545.5
1/31/1975 1975 1 31 245 19 42 30.5 -1.5 5544
2/1/1975 1975 2 1 246 25 47 36 4 5548
2/2/1975 1975 2 2 247 15 40 27.5 -4.5 5543.5
2/3/1975 1975 2 3 248 20 40 30 -2 5541.5
2/4/1975 1975 2 4 249 22 40 31 -1 5540.5
2/5/1975 1975 2 5 250 25 38 31.5 -0.5 5540
2/6/1975 1975 2 6 251 13 42 27.5 -4.5 5535.5
2/7/1975 1975 2 7 252 25 42 33.5 1.5 5537
2/8/1975 1975 2 8 253 18 52 35 3 5540
2/9/1975 1975 2 9 254 23 57 40 8 5548
2/10/1975 1975 2 10 255 45 54 49.5 17.5 5565.5
2/11/1975 1975 2 11 256 18 53 35.5 3.5 5569
2/12/1975 1975 2 12 257 17 45 31 -1 5568
2/13/1975 1975 2 13 258 18 45 31.5 -0.5 5567.5
2/14/1975 1975 2 14 259 34 45 39.5 7.5 5575
2/15/1975 1975 2 15 260 35 49 42 10 5585
2/16/1975 1975 2 16 261 23 45 34 2 5587
2/17/1975 1975 2 17 262 25 42 33.5 1.5 5588.5
2/18/1975 1975 2 18 263 16 42 29 -3 5585.5
2/19/1975 1975 2 19 264 14 43 28.5 -3.5 5582
2/20/1975 1975 2 20 265 19 46 32.5 0.5 5582.5
2/21/1975 1975 2 21 266 19 32 25.5 -6.5 5576
2/22/1975 1975 2 22 267 16 40 28 -4 5572
2/23/1975 1975 2 23 268 15 48 31.5 -0.5 5571.5
2/24/1975 1975 2 24 269 14 50 32 0 5571.5
2/25/1975 1975 2 25 270 15 53 34 2 5573.5
2/26/1975 1975 2 26 271 17 60 38.5 6.5 5580
2/27/1975 1975 2 27 272 27 60 43.5 11.5 5591.5
2/28/1975 1975 2 28 273 24 67 45.5 13.5 5605
3/1/1975 1975 3 1 274 26 65 45.5 13.5 5618.5
3/2/1975 1975 3 2 275 26 67 46.5 14.5 5633
3/3/1975 1975 3 3 276 26 57 41.5 9.5 5642.5
3/4/1975 1975 3 4 277 23 58 40.5 8.5 5651
3/5/1975 1975 3 5 278 25 60 42.5 10.5 5661.5
3/6/1975 1975 3 6 279 43 55 49 17 5678.5
3/7/1975 1975 3 7 280 27 62 44.5 12.5 5691
3/8/1975 1975 3 8 281 36 68 52 20 5711
3/9/1975 1975 3 9 282 40 60 50 18 5729
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
3/10/1975 1975 3 10 283 32 52 42 10 5739
3/11/1975 1975 3 11 284 28 52 40 8 5747
3/12/1975 1975 3 12 285 29 52 40.5 8.5 5755.5
3/13/1975 1975 3 13 286 24 57 40.5 8.5 5764
3/14/1975 1975 3 14 287 37 52 44.5 12.5 5776.5
3/15/1975 1975 3 15 288 24 60 42 10 5786.5
3/16/1975 1975 3 16 289 38 57 47.5 15.5 5802
3/17/1975 1975 3 17 290 33 52 42.5 10.5 5812.5
3/18/1975 1975 3 18 291 23 50 36.5 4.5 5817
3/19/1975 1975 3 19 292 25 70 47.5 15.5 5832.5
3/20/1975 1975 3 20 293 43 67 55 23 5855.5
3/21/1975 1975 3 21 294 48 70 59 27 5882.5
3/22/1975 1975 3 22 295 32 58 45 13 5895.5
3/23/1975 1975 3 23 296 20 47 33.5 1.5 5897
3/24/1975 1975 3 24 297 20 59 39.5 7.5 5904.5
3/25/1975 1975 3 25 298 40 55 47.5 15.5 5920
3/26/1975 1975 3 26 299 32 42 37 5 5925
3/27/1975 1975 3 27 300 22 33 27.5 -4.5 5920.5
3/28/1975 1975 3 28 301 18 34 26 -6 5914.5
3/29/1975 1975 3 29 302 10 43 26.5 -5.5 5909
3/30/1975 1975 3 30 303 15 54 34.5 2.5 5911.5
3/31/1975 1975 3 31 304 31 54 42.5 10.5 5922
4/1/1975 1975 4 1 305 29 43 36 4 5926
4/2/1975 1975 4 2 306 18 44 31 -1 5925
4/3/1975 1975 4 3 307 22 60 41 9 5934
4/4/1975 1975 4 4 308 38 69 53.5 21.5 5955.5
4/5/1975 1975 4 5 309 49 70 59.5 27.5 5983
4/6/1975 1975 4 6 310 38 65 51.5 19.5 6002.5
4/7/1975 1975 4 7 311 30 47 38.5 6.5 6009
4/8/1975 1975 4 8 312 25 52 38.5 6.5 6015.5
4/9/1975 1975 4 9 313 19 53 36 4 6019.5
4/10/1975 1975 4 10 314 30 60 45 13 6032.5
4/11/1975 1975 4 11 315 36 45 40.5 8.5 6041
4/12/1975 1975 4 12 316 38 47 42.5 10.5 6051.5
4/13/1975 1975 4 13 317 30 62 46 14 6065.5
4/14/1975 1975 4 14 318 32 64 48 16 6081.5
4/15/1975 1975 4 15 319 45 70 57.5 25.5 6107
4/16/1975 1975 4 16 320 50 70 60 28 6135
4/17/1975 1975 4 17 321 40 53 46.5 14.5 6149.5
4/18/1975 1975 4 18 322 28 54 41 9 6158.5
4/19/1975 1975 4 19 323 28 65 46.5 14.5 6173
4/20/1975 1975 4 20 324 32 68 50 18 6191
4/21/1975 1975 4 21 325 38 76 57 25 6216
4/22/1975 1975 4 22 326 55 75 65 33 6249
4/23/1975 1975 4 23 327 40 75 57.5 25.5 6274.5
4/24/1975 1975 4 24 328 36 75 55.5 23.5 6298
4/25/1975 1975 4 25 329 46 77 61.5 29.5 6327.5
4/26/1975 1975 4 26 330 34 53 43.5 11.5 6339
4/27/1975 1975 4 27 331 35 58 46.5 14.5 6353.5
4/28/1975 1975 4 28 332 35 56 45.5 13.5 6367
4/29/1975 1975 4 29 333 34 59 46.5 14.5 6381.5
4/30/1975 1975 4 30 334 28 64 46 14 6395.5
5/1/1975 1975 5 1 335 38 71 54.5 22.5 6418
5/2/1975 1975 5 2 336 44 69 56.5 24.5 6442.5
5/3/1975 1975 5 3 337 36 78 57 25 6467.5
5/4/1975 1975 5 4 338 48 68 58 26 6493.5
5/5/1975 1975 5 5 339 35 52 43.5 11.5 6505
5/6/1975 1975 5 6 340 30 55 42.5 10.5 6515.5
5/7/1975 1975 5 7 341 28 63 45.5 13.5 6529
5/8/1975 1975 5 8 342 33 75 54 22 6551
5/9/1975 1975 5 9 343 39 83 61 29 6580
5/10/1975 1975 5 10 344 36 84 60 28 6608
5/11/1975 1975 5 11 345 38 90 64 32 6640
5/12/1975 1975 5 12 346 53 75 64 32 6672
5/13/1975 1975 5 13 347 38 80 59 27 6699
5/14/1975 1975 5 14 348 39 89 64 32 6731
5/15/1975 1975 5 15 349 41 92 66.5 34.5 6765.5
5/16/1975 1975 5 16 350 55 84 69.5 37.5 6803
5/17/1975 1975 5 17 351 48 85 66.5 34.5 6837.5
5/18/1975 1975 5 18 352 57 77 67 35 6872.5
5/19/1975 1975 5 19 353 48 84 66 34 6906.5
5/20/1975 1975 5 20 354 47 70 58.5 26.5 6933
5/21/1975 1975 5 21 355 40 64 52 20 6953
5/22/1975 1975 5 22 356 34 69 51.5 19.5 6972.5
5/23/1975 1975 5 23 357 32 71 51.5 19.5 6992
5/24/1975 1975 5 24 358 40 82 61 29 7021
5/25/1975 1975 5 25 359 54 77 65.5 33.5 7054.5
5/26/1975 1975 5 26 360 45 79 62 30 7084.5
5/27/1975 1975 5 27 361 53 67 60 28 7112.5
5/28/1975 1975 5 28 362 48 70 59 27 7139.5
5/29/1975 1975 5 29 363 48 64 56 24 7163.5
5/30/1975 1975 5 30 364 38 75 56.5 24.5 7188
5/31/1975 1975 5 31 365 69 83 76 44 7232
6/1/1975 1975 6 1 1 50 89 69.5 37.5 37.5
6/2/1975 1975 6 2 2 52 93 72.5 40.5 78
6/3/1975 1975 6 3 3 56 85 70.5 38.5 116.5
6/4/1975 1975 6 4 4 57 84 70.5 38.5 155
6/5/1975 1975 6 5 5 49 90 69.5 37.5 192.5
6/6/1975 1975 6 6 6 55 95 75 43 235.5
6/7/1975 1975 6 7 7 63 80 71.5 39.5 275
6/8/1975 1975 6 8 8 57 74 65.5 33.5 308.5
6/9/1975 1975 6 9 9 41 80 60.5 28.5 337
6/10/1975 1975 6 10 10 38 70 54 22 359
6/11/1975 1975 6 11 11 38 82 60 28 387
6/12/1975 1975 6 12 12 45 92 68.5 36.5 423.5
6/13/1975 1975 6 13 13 49 97 73 41 464.5
6/14/1975 1975 6 14 14 58 92 75 43 507.5
6/15/1975 1975 6 15 15 52 93 72.5 40.5 548
6/16/1975 1975 6 16 16 55 94 74.5 42.5 590.5
6/17/1975 1975 6 17 17 53 95 74 42 632.5
6/18/1975 1975 6 18 18 47 60 53.5 21.5 654
6/19/1975 1975 6 19 19 46 79 62.5 30.5 684.5
6/20/1975 1975 6 20 20 50 78 64 32 716.5
6/21/1975 1975 6 21 21 42 80 61 29 745.5
6/22/1975 1975 6 22 22 40 77 58.5 26.5 772
6/23/1975 1975 6 23 23 45 89 67 35 807
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
6/24/1975 1975 6 24 24 49 93 71 39 846
6/25/1975 1975 6 25 25 66 77 71.5 39.5 885.5
6/26/1975 1975 6 26 26 40 83 61.5 29.5 915
6/27/1975 1975 6 27 27 43 97 70 38 953
6/28/1975 1975 6 28 28 53 97 75 43 996
6/29/1975 1975 6 29 29 55 98 76.5 44.5 1040.5
6/30/1975 1975 6 30 30 45 101 73 41 1081.5
7/1/1975 1975 7 1 31 48 103 75.5 43.5 1125
7/2/1975 1975 7 2 32 53 103 78 46 1171
7/3/1975 1975 7 3 33 72 93 82.5 50.5 1221.5
7/4/1975 1975 7 4 34 58 95 76.5 44.5 1266
7/5/1975 1975 7 5 35 63 96 79.5 47.5 1313.5
7/6/1975 1975 7 6 36 65 99 82 50 1363.5
7/7/1975 1975 7 7 37 64 103 83.5 51.5 1415
7/8/1975 1975 7 8 38 68 98 83 51 1466
7/9/1975 1975 7 9 39 65 92 78.5 46.5 1512.5
7/10/1975 1975 7 10 40 69 84 76.5 44.5 1557
7/11/1975 1975 7 11 41 64 93 78.5 46.5 1603.5
7/12/1975 1975 7 12 42 65 90 77.5 45.5 1649
7/13/1975 1975 7 13 43 67 95 81 49 1698
7/14/1975 1975 7 14 44 58 90 74 42 1740
7/15/1975 1975 7 15 45 67 98 82.5 50.5 1790.5
7/16/1975 1975 7 16 46 68 89 78.5 46.5 1837
7/17/1975 1975 7 17 47 87 95 91 59 1896
7/18/1975 1975 7 18 48 62 96 79 47 1943
7/19/1975 1975 7 19 49 61 99 80 48 1991
7/20/1975 1975 7 20 50 58 100 79 47 2038
7/21/1975 1975 7 21 51 68 100 84 52 2090
7/22/1975 1975 7 22 52 55 101 78 46 2136
7/23/1975 1975 7 23 53 55 99 77 45 2181
7/24/1975 1975 7 24 54 73 100 86.5 54.5 2235.5
7/25/1975 1975 7 25 55 55 98 76.5 44.5 2280
7/26/1975 1975 7 26 56 70 96 83 51 2331
7/27/1975 1975 7 27 57 65 99 82 50 2381
7/28/1975 1975 7 28 58 58 98 78 46 2427
7/29/1975 1975 7 29 59 60 90 75 43 2470
7/30/1975 1975 7 30 60 59 86 72.5 40.5 2510.5
7/31/1975 1975 7 31 61 57 93 75 43 2553.5
8/1/1975 1975 8 1 62 57 90 73.5 41.5 2595
8/2/1975 1975 8 2 63 52 94 73 41 2636
8/3/1975 1975 8 3 64 50 95 72.5 40.5 2676.5
8/4/1975 1975 8 4 65 52 97 74.5 42.5 2719
8/5/1975 1975 8 5 66 53 101 77 45 2764
8/6/1975 1975 8 6 67 60 93 76.5 44.5 2808.5
8/7/1975 1975 8 7 68 71 103 87 55 2863.5
8/8/1975 1975 8 8 69 55 100 77.5 45.5 2909
8/9/1975 1975 8 9 70 60 96 78 46 2955
8/10/1975 1975 8 10 71 60 95 77.5 45.5 3000.5
8/11/1975 1975 8 11 72 68 91 79.5 47.5 3048
8/12/1975 1975 8 12 73 58 92 75 43 3091
8/13/1975 1975 8 13 74 55 86 70.5 38.5 3129.5
8/14/1975 1975 8 14 75 66 95 80.5 48.5 3178
8/15/1975 1975 8 15 76 55 93 74 42 3220
8/16/1975 1975 8 16 77 59 94 76.5 44.5 3264.5
8/17/1975 1975 8 17 78 49 95 72 40 3304.5
8/18/1975 1975 8 18 79 52 94 73 41 3345.5
8/19/1975 1975 8 19 80 59 83 71 39 3384.5
8/20/1975 1975 8 20 81 62 75 68.5 36.5 3421
8/21/1975 1975 8 21 82 60 86 73 41 3462
8/22/1975 1975 8 22 83 52 89 70.5 38.5 3500.5
8/23/1975 1975 8 23 84 53 95 74 42 3542.5
8/24/1975 1975 8 24 85 57 92 74.5 42.5 3585
8/25/1975 1975 8 25 86 47 92 69.5 37.5 3622.5
8/26/1975 1975 8 26 87 48 99 73.5 41.5 3664
8/27/1975 1975 8 27 88 55 91 73 41 3705
8/28/1975 1975 8 28 89 48 94 71 39 3744
8/29/1975 1975 8 29 90 45 92 68.5 36.5 3780.5
8/30/1975 1975 8 30 91 43 96 69.5 37.5 3818
8/31/1975 1975 8 31 92 43 97 70 38 3856
9/1/1975 1975 9 1 93 53 100 76.5 44.5 3900.5
9/2/1975 1975 9 2 94 52 92 72 40 3940.5
9/3/1975 1975 9 3 95 47 92 69.5 37.5 3978
9/4/1975 1975 9 4 96 52 93 72.5 40.5 4018.5
9/5/1975 1975 9 5 97 48 88 68 36 4054.5
9/6/1975 1975 9 6 98 47 90 68.5 36.5 4091
9/7/1975 1975 9 7 99 54 90 72 40 4131
9/8/1975 1975 9 8 100 62 82 72 40 4171
9/9/1975 1975 9 9 101 52 76 64 32 4203
9/10/1975 1975 9 10 102 58 87 72.5 40.5 4243.5
9/11/1975 1975 9 11 103 50 80 65 33 4276.5
9/12/1975 1975 9 12 104 52 81 66.5 34.5 4311
9/13/1975 1975 9 13 105 52 78 65 33 4344
9/14/1975 1975 9 14 106 49 84 66.5 34.5 4378.5
9/15/1975 1975 9 15 107 49 87 68 36 4414.5
9/16/1975 1975 9 16 108 52 92 72 40 4454.5
9/17/1975 1975 9 17 109 52 92 72 40 4494.5
9/18/1975 1975 9 18 110 52 85 68.5 36.5 4531
9/19/1975 1975 9 19 111 41 78 59.5 27.5 4558.5
9/20/1975 1975 9 20 112 40 83 61.5 29.5 4588
9/21/1975 1975 9 21 113 35 72 53.5 21.5 4609.5
9/22/1975 1975 9 22 114 30 78 54 22 4631.5
9/23/1975 1975 9 23 115 32 82 57 25 4656.5
9/24/1975 1975 9 24 116 34 83 58.5 26.5 4683
9/25/1975 1975 9 25 117 35 85 60 28 4711
9/26/1975 1975 9 26 118 42 90 66 34 4745
9/27/1975 1975 9 27 119 42 90 66 34 4779
9/28/1975 1975 9 28 120 37 84 60.5 28.5 4807.5
9/29/1975 1975 9 29 121 35 90 62.5 30.5 4838
9/30/1975 1975 9 30 122 38 78 58 26 4864
10/1/1975 1975 10 1 123 33 77 55 23 4887
10/2/1975 1975 10 2 124 32 81 56.5 24.5 4911.5
10/3/1975 1975 10 3 125 32 83 57.5 25.5 4937
10/4/1975 1975 10 4 126 34 85 59.5 27.5 4964.5
10/5/1975 1975 10 5 127 38 83 60.5 28.5 4993
10/6/1975 1975 10 6 128 37 84 60.5 28.5 5021.5
10/7/1975 1975 10 7 129 40 68 54 22 5043.5
10/8/1975 1975 10 8 130 26 60 43 11 5054.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
10/9/1975 1975 10 9 131 26 70 48 16 5070.5
10/10/1975 1975 10 10 132 30 84 57 25 5095.5
10/11/1975 1975 10 11 133 45 83 64 32 5127.5
10/12/1975 1975 10 12 134 52 79 65.5 33.5 5161
10/13/1975 1975 10 13 135 37 65 51 19 5180
10/14/1975 1975 10 14 136 26 62 44 12 5192
10/15/1975 1975 10 15 137 26 65 45.5 13.5 5205.5
10/16/1975 1975 10 16 138 24 70 47 15 5220.5
10/17/1975 1975 10 17 139 28 75 51.5 19.5 5240
10/18/1975 1975 10 18 140 31 70 50.5 18.5 5258.5
10/19/1975 1975 10 19 141 30 76 53 21 5279.5
10/20/1975 1975 10 20 142 27 77 52 20 5299.5
10/21/1975 1975 10 21 143 28 78 53 21 5320.5
10/22/1975 1975 10 22 144 32 79 55.5 23.5 5344
10/23/1975 1975 10 23 145 32 45 38.5 6.5 5350.5
10/24/1975 1975 10 24 146 28 50 39 7 5357.5
10/25/1975 1975 10 25 147 22 50 36 4 5361.5
10/26/1975 1975 10 26 148 27 62 44.5 12.5 5374
10/27/1975 1975 10 27 149 38 72 55 23 5397
10/28/1975 1975 10 28 150 29 67 48 16 5413
10/29/1975 1975 10 29 151 24 63 43.5 11.5 5424.5
10/30/1975 1975 10 30 152 25 60 42.5 10.5 5435
10/31/1975 1975 10 31 153 44 55 49.5 17.5 5452.5
11/1/1975 1975 11 1 154 29 66 47.5 15.5 5468
11/2/1975 1975 11 2 155 25 64 44.5 12.5 5480.5
11/3/1975 1975 11 3 156 25 67 46 14 5494.5
11/4/1975 1975 11 4 157 26 68 47 15 5509.5
11/5/1975 1975 11 5 158 25 65 45 13 5522.5
11/6/1975 1975 11 6 159 28 68 48 16 5538.5
11/7/1975 1975 11 7 160 26 69 47.5 15.5 5554
11/8/1975 1975 11 8 161 34 57 45.5 13.5 5567.5
11/9/1975 1975 11 9 162 24 52 38 6 5573.5
11/10/1975 1975 11 10 163 18 62 40 8 5581.5
11/11/1975 1975 11 11 164 29 47 38 6 5587.5
11/12/1975 1975 11 12 165 20 35 27.5 -4.5 5583
11/13/1975 1975 11 13 166 9 47 28 -4 5579
11/14/1975 1975 11 14 167 9 52 30.5 -1.5 5577.5
11/15/1975 1975 11 15 168 15 56 35.5 3.5 5581
11/16/1975 1975 11 16 169 15 58 36.5 4.5 5585.5
11/17/1975 1975 11 17 170 18 63 40.5 8.5 5594
11/18/1975 1975 11 18 171 28 53 40.5 8.5 5602.5
11/19/1975 1975 11 19 172 25 46 35.5 3.5 5606
11/20/1975 1975 11 20 173 10 42 26 -6 5600
11/21/1975 1975 11 21 174 14 44 29 -3 5597
11/22/1975 1975 11 22 175 10 45 27.5 -4.5 5592.5
11/23/1975 1975 11 23 176 10 48 29 -3 5589.5
11/24/1975 1975 11 24 177 11 51 31 -1 5588.5
11/25/1975 1975 11 25 178 35 43 39 7 5595.5
11/26/1975 1975 11 26 179 5 44 24.5 -7.5 5588
11/27/1975 1975 11 27 180 27 36 31.5 -0.5 5587.5
11/28/1975 1975 11 28 181 28 43 35.5 3.5 5591
11/29/1975 1975 11 29 182 18 40 29 -3 5588
11/30/1975 1975 11 30 183 6 40 23 -9 5579
12/1/1975 1975 12 1 184 14 38 26 -6 5573
12/2/1975 1975 12 2 185 13 40 26.5 -5.5 5567.5
12/3/1975 1975 12 3 186 12 42 27 -5 5562.5
12/4/1975 1975 12 4 187 12 40 26 -6 5556.5
12/5/1975 1975 12 5 188 15 43 29 -3 5553.5
12/6/1975 1975 12 6 189 15 24 19.5 -12.5 5541
12/7/1975 1975 12 7 190 17 48 32.5 0.5 5541.5
12/8/1975 1975 12 8 191 18 46 32 0 5541.5
12/9/1975 1975 12 9 192 15 50 32.5 0.5 5542
12/10/1975 1975 12 10 193 15 50 32.5 0.5 5542.5
12/11/1975 1975 12 11 194 25 52 38.5 6.5 5549
12/12/1975 1975 12 12 195 25 50 37.5 5.5 5554.5
12/13/1975 1975 12 13 196 32 48 40 8 5562.5
12/14/1975 1975 12 14 197 16 38 27 -5 5557.5
12/15/1975 1975 12 15 198 8 33 20.5 -11.5 5546
12/16/1975 1975 12 16 199 4 40 22 -10 5536
12/17/1975 1975 12 17 200 5 38 21.5 -10.5 5525.5
12/18/1975 1975 12 18 201 7 42 24.5 -7.5 5518
12/19/1975 1975 12 19 202 4 42 23 -9 5509
12/20/1975 1975 12 20 203 3 42 22.5 -9.5 5499.5
12/21/1975 1975 12 21 204 21 35 28 -4 5495.5
12/22/1975 1975 12 22 205 26 32 29 -3 5492.5
12/23/1975 1975 12 23 206 20 34 27 -5 5487.5
12/24/1975 1975 12 24 207 8 43 25.5 -6.5 5481
12/25/1975 1975 12 25 208 12 46 29 -3 5478
12/26/1975 1975 12 26 209 12 42 27 -5 5473
12/27/1975 1975 12 27 210 17 47 32 0 5473
12/28/1975 1975 12 28 211 12 40 26 -6 5467
12/29/1975 1975 12 29 212 4 41 22.5 -9.5 5457.5
12/30/1975 1975 12 30 213 6 39 22.5 -9.5 5448
12/31/1975 1975 12 31 214 24 32 28 -4 5444
1/1/1976 1976 1 1 215 3 28 15.5 -16.5 5427.5
1/2/1976 1976 1 2 216 -4 28 12 -20 5407.5
1/3/1976 1976 1 3 217 -2 25 11.5 -20.5 5387
1/4/1976 1976 1 4 218 9 30 19.5 -12.5 5374.5
1/5/1976 1976 1 5 219 7 28 17.5 -14.5 5360
1/6/1976 1976 1 6 220 15 33 24 -8 5352
1/7/1976 1976 1 7 221 8 40 24 -8 5344
1/8/1976 1976 1 8 222 10 38 24 -8 5336
1/9/1976 1976 1 9 223 5 35 20 -12 5324
1/10/1976 1976 1 10 224 9 47 28 -4 5320
1/11/1976 1976 1 11 225 5 37 21 -11 5309
1/12/1976 1976 1 12 226 9 47 28 -4 5305
1/13/1976 1976 1 13 227 12 43 27.5 -4.5 5300.5
1/14/1976 1976 1 14 228 5 38 21.5 -10.5 5290
1/15/1976 1976 1 15 229 10 39 24.5 -7.5 5282.5
1/16/1976 1976 1 16 230 10 53 31.5 -0.5 5282
1/17/1976 1976 1 17 231 10 54 32 0 5282
1/18/1976 1976 1 18 232 13 51 32 0 5282
1/19/1976 1976 1 19 233 11 52 31.5 -0.5 5281.5
1/20/1976 1976 1 20 234 7 47 27 -5 5276.5
1/21/1976 1976 1 21 235 5 47 26 -6 5270.5
1/22/1976 1976 1 22 236 2 45 23.5 -8.5 5262
1/23/1976 1976 1 23 237 6 47 26.5 -5.5 5256.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
1/24/1976 1976 1 24 238 27 48 37.5 5.5 5262
1/25/1976 1976 1 25 239 8 42 25 -7 5255
1/26/1976 1976 1 26 240 3 40 21.5 -10.5 5244.5
1/27/1976 1976 1 27 241 7 44 25.5 -6.5 5238
1/28/1976 1976 1 28 242 9 52 30.5 -1.5 5236.5
1/29/1976 1976 1 29 243 9 56 32.5 0.5 5237
1/30/1976 1976 1 30 244 11 53 32 0 5237
1/31/1976 1976 1 31 245 12 54 33 1 5238
2/1/1976 1976 2 1 246 10 50 30 -2 5236
2/2/1976 1976 2 2 247 8 10 9 -23 5213
2/3/1976 1976 2 3 248 17 49 33 1 5214
2/4/1976 1976 2 4 249 46 50 48 16 5230
2/5/1976 1976 2 5 250 40 53 46.5 14.5 5244.5
2/6/1976 1976 2 6 251 34 40 37 5 5249.5
2/7/1976 1976 2 7 252 36 46 41 9 5258.5
2/8/1976 1976 2 8 253 38 47 42.5 10.5 5269
2/9/1976 1976 2 9 254 39 58 48.5 16.5 5285.5
2/10/1976 1976 2 10 255 34 52 43 11 5296.5
2/11/1976 1976 2 11 256 22 53 37.5 5.5 5302
2/12/1976 1976 2 12 257 22 53 37.5 5.5 5307.5
2/13/1976 1976 2 13 258 23 55 39 7 5314.5
2/14/1976 1976 2 14 259 32 57 44.5 12.5 5327
2/15/1976 1976 2 15 260 26 52 39 7 5334
2/16/1976 1976 2 16 261 22 52 37 5 5339
2/17/1976 1976 2 17 262 33 52 42.5 10.5 5349.5
2/18/1976 1976 2 18 263 20 57 38.5 6.5 5356
2/19/1976 1976 2 19 264 19 61 40 8 5364
2/20/1976 1976 2 20 265 32 45 38.5 6.5 5370.5
2/21/1976 1976 2 21 266 12 45 28.5 -3.5 5367
2/22/1976 1976 2 22 267 10 49 29.5 -2.5 5364.5
2/23/1976 1976 2 23 268 14 46 30 -2 5362.5
2/24/1976 1976 2 24 269 18 59 38.5 6.5 5369
2/25/1976 1976 2 25 270 16 62 39 7 5376
2/26/1976 1976 2 26 271 22 62 42 10 5386
2/27/1976 1976 2 27 272 20 58 39 7 5393
2/28/1976 1976 2 28 273 26 61 43.5 11.5 5404.5
2/29/1976 1976 2 29 274 62 62 62 30 5434.5
3/1/1976 1976 3 1 275 64 64 64 32 5466.5
3/3/1976 1976 3 3 277 28 32 30 -2 5464.5
3/4/1976 1976 3 4 278 22 50 36 4 5468.5
3/5/1976 1976 3 5 279 6 35 20.5 -11.5 5457
3/6/1976 1976 3 6 280 5 39 22 -10 5447
3/7/1976 1976 3 7 281 20 50 35 3 5450
3/8/1976 1976 3 8 282 20 55 37.5 5.5 5455.5
3/9/1976 1976 3 9 283 20 59 39.5 7.5 5463
3/10/1976 1976 3 10 284 22 58 40 8 5471
3/11/1976 1976 3 11 285 34 47 40.5 8.5 5479.5
3/12/1976 1976 3 12 286 22 48 35 3 5482.5
3/13/1976 1976 3 13 287 17 50 33.5 1.5 5484
3/14/1976 1976 3 14 288 37 65 51 19 5503
3/15/1976 1976 3 15 289 25 58 41.5 9.5 5512.5
3/16/1976 1976 3 16 290 19 60 39.5 7.5 5520
3/17/1976 1976 3 17 291 28 68 48 16 5536
3/18/1976 1976 3 18 292 32 74 53 21 5557
3/19/1976 1976 3 19 293 35 52 43.5 11.5 5568.5
3/20/1976 1976 3 20 294 30 48 39 7 5575.5
3/21/1976 1976 3 21 295 15 60 37.5 5.5 5581
3/22/1976 1976 3 22 296 20 67 43.5 11.5 5592.5
3/23/1976 1976 3 23 297 38 76 57 25 5617.5
3/24/1976 1976 3 24 298 26 74 50 18 5635.5
3/25/1976 1976 3 25 299 34 63 48.5 16.5 5652
3/26/1976 1976 3 26 300 16 55 35.5 3.5 5655.5
3/27/1976 1976 3 27 301 35 63 49 17 5672.5
3/28/1976 1976 3 28 302 25 49 37 5 5677.5
3/29/1976 1976 3 29 303 14 48 31 -1 5676.5
3/30/1976 1976 3 30 304 17 58 37.5 5.5 5682
3/31/1976 1976 3 31 305 19 67 43 11 5693
4/1/1976 1976 4 1 306 28 73 50.5 18.5 5711.5
4/2/1976 1976 4 2 307 26 74 50 18 5729.5
4/3/1976 1976 4 3 308 27 74 50.5 18.5 5748
4/4/1976 1976 4 4 309 45 76 60.5 28.5 5776.5
4/5/1976 1976 4 5 310 43 62 52.5 20.5 5797
4/6/1976 1976 4 6 311 49 59 54 22 5819
4/7/1976 1976 4 7 312 35 69 52 20 5839
4/8/1976 1976 4 8 313 32 75 53.5 21.5 5860.5
4/9/1976 1976 4 9 314 49 72 60.5 28.5 5889
4/10/1976 1976 4 10 315 27 75 51 19 5908
4/11/1976 1976 4 11 316 33 80 56.5 24.5 5932.5
4/12/1976 1976 4 12 317 58 72 65 33 5965.5
4/13/1976 1976 4 13 318 45 60 52.5 20.5 5986
4/14/1976 1976 4 14 319 42 56 49 17 6003
4/15/1976 1976 4 15 320 38 59 48.5 16.5 6019.5
4/16/1976 1976 4 16 321 40 52 46 14 6033.5
4/17/1976 1976 4 17 322 40 65 52.5 20.5 6054
4/18/1976 1976 4 18 323 42 60 51 19 6073
4/19/1976 1976 4 19 324 30 64 47 15 6088
4/20/1976 1976 4 20 325 30 74 52 20 6108
4/21/1976 1976 4 21 326 35 80 57.5 25.5 6133.5
4/22/1976 1976 4 22 327 43 80 61.5 29.5 6163
4/23/1976 1976 4 23 328 55 70 62.5 30.5 6193.5
4/24/1976 1976 4 24 329 30 75 52.5 20.5 6214
4/25/1976 1976 4 25 330 45 81 63 31 6245
4/26/1976 1976 4 26 331 33 53 43 11 6256
4/27/1976 1976 4 27 332 21 63 42 10 6266
4/28/1976 1976 4 28 333 27 75 51 19 6285
4/29/1976 1976 4 29 334 42 78 60 28 6313
4/30/1976 1976 4 30 335 40 71 55.5 23.5 6336.5
5/1/1976 1976 5 1 336 33 77 55 23 6359.5
5/2/1976 1976 5 2 337 32 83 57.5 25.5 6385
5/3/1976 1976 5 3 338 42 89 65.5 33.5 6418.5
5/4/1976 1976 5 4 339 62 80 71 39 6457.5
5/5/1976 1976 5 5 340 40 75 57.5 25.5 6483
5/6/1976 1976 5 6 341 50 68 59 27 6510
5/7/1976 1976 5 7 342 47 62 54.5 22.5 6532.5
5/8/1976 1976 5 8 343 46 60 53 21 6553.5
5/9/1976 1976 5 9 344 52 72 62 30 6583.5
5/10/1976 1976 5 10 345 46 80 63 31 6614.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
5/11/1976 1976 5 11 346 47 83 65 33 6647.5
5/12/1976 1976 5 12 347 43 77 60 28 6675.5
5/13/1976 1976 5 13 348 40 86 63 31 6706.5
5/14/1976 1976 5 14 349 45 90 67.5 35.5 6742
5/15/1976 1976 5 15 350 62 85 73.5 41.5 6783.5
5/16/1976 1976 5 16 351 48 80 64 32 6815.5
5/17/1976 1976 5 17 352 45 95 70 38 6853.5
5/18/1976 1976 5 18 353 49 75 62 30 6883.5
5/19/1976 1976 5 19 354 53 83 68 36 6919.5
5/20/1976 1976 5 20 355 59 80 69.5 37.5 6957
5/21/1976 1976 5 21 356 53 64 58.5 26.5 6983.5
5/22/1976 1976 5 22 357 47 75 61 29 7012.5
5/23/1976 1976 5 23 358 58 82 70 38 7050.5
5/24/1976 1976 5 24 359 48 77 62.5 30.5 7081
5/25/1976 1976 5 25 360 45 78 61.5 29.5 7110.5
5/26/1976 1976 5 26 361 45 83 64 32 7142.5
5/27/1976 1976 5 27 362 44 92 68 36 7178.5
5/28/1976 1976 5 28 363 51 92 71.5 39.5 7218
5/29/1976 1976 5 29 364 58 90 74 42 7260
5/30/1976 1976 5 30 365 52 82 67 35 7295
5/31/1976 1976 5 31 366 44 90 67 35 7330
6/1/1976 1976 6 1 1 49 94 71.5 39.5 39.5
6/2/1976 1976 6 2 2 47 94 70.5 38.5 78
6/3/1976 1976 6 3 3 55 92 73.5 41.5 119.5
6/4/1976 1976 6 4 4 49 90 69.5 37.5 157
6/5/1976 1976 6 5 5 48 92 70 38 195
6/6/1976 1976 6 6 6 48 95 71.5 39.5 234.5
6/7/1976 1976 6 7 7 63 94 78.5 46.5 281
6/8/1976 1976 6 8 8 63 97 80 48 329
6/9/1976 1976 6 9 9 60 95 77.5 45.5 374.5
6/10/1976 1976 6 10 10 53 92 72.5 40.5 415
6/11/1976 1976 6 11 11 58 74 66 34 449
6/12/1976 1976 6 12 12 54 78 66 34 483
6/13/1976 1976 6 13 13 43 86 64.5 32.5 515.5
6/14/1976 1976 6 14 14 35 72 53.5 21.5 537
6/15/1976 1976 6 15 15 51 83 67 35 572
6/16/1976 1976 6 16 16 53 98 75.5 43.5 615.5
6/17/1976 1976 6 17 17 52 82 67 35 650.5
6/18/1976 1976 6 18 18 65 90 77.5 45.5 696
6/19/1976 1976 6 19 19 47 97 72 40 736
6/20/1976 1976 6 20 20 52 102 77 45 781
6/21/1976 1976 6 21 21 53 97 75 43 824
6/22/1976 1976 6 22 22 64 93 78.5 46.5 870.5
6/23/1976 1976 6 23 23 47 80 63.5 31.5 902
6/24/1976 1976 6 24 24 42 87 64.5 32.5 934.5
6/25/1976 1976 6 25 25 42 97 69.5 37.5 972
6/26/1976 1976 6 26 26 52 95 73.5 41.5 1013.5
6/27/1976 1976 6 27 27 52 101 76.5 44.5 1058
6/28/1976 1976 6 28 28 69 105 87 55 1113
6/29/1976 1976 6 29 29 53 105 79 47 1160
6/30/1976 1976 6 30 30 70 95 82.5 50.5 1210.5
7/1/1976 1976 7 1 31 58 100 79 47 1257.5
7/2/1976 1976 7 2 32 72 98 85 53 1310.5
7/3/1976 1976 7 3 33 50 100 75 43 1353.5
7/4/1976 1976 7 4 34 52 105 78.5 46.5 1400
7/5/1976 1976 7 5 35 58 103 80.5 48.5 1448.5
7/6/1976 1976 7 6 36 60 105 82.5 50.5 1499
7/7/1976 1976 7 7 37 65 104 84.5 52.5 1551.5
7/8/1976 1976 7 8 38 94 103 98.5 66.5 1618
7/9/1976 1976 7 9 39 82 107 94.5 62.5 1680.5
7/10/1976 1976 7 10 40 80 109 94.5 62.5 1743
7/11/1976 1976 7 11 41 78 103 90.5 58.5 1801.5
7/12/1976 1976 7 12 42 75 98 86.5 54.5 1856
7/13/1976 1976 7 13 43 71 97 84 52 1908
7/14/1976 1976 7 14 44 72 101 86.5 54.5 1962.5
7/15/1976 1976 7 15 45 58 100 79 47 2009.5
7/16/1976 1976 7 16 46 58 104 81 49 2058.5
7/17/1976 1976 7 17 47 68 97 82.5 50.5 2109
7/18/1976 1976 7 18 48 65 78 71.5 39.5 2148.5
7/19/1976 1976 7 19 49 60 90 75 43 2191.5
7/20/1976 1976 7 20 50 59 96 77.5 45.5 2237
7/21/1976 1976 7 21 51 60 95 77.5 45.5 2282.5
7/22/1976 1976 7 22 52 63 101 82 50 2332.5
7/23/1976 1976 7 23 53 83 100 91.5 59.5 2392
7/24/1976 1976 7 24 54 70 99 84.5 52.5 2444.5
7/25/1976 1976 7 25 55 53 95 74 42 2486.5
7/26/1976 1976 7 26 56 63 95 79 47 2533.5
7/27/1976 1976 7 27 57 64 100 82 50 2583.5
7/28/1976 1976 7 28 58 60 101 80.5 48.5 2632
7/29/1976 1976 7 29 59 64 102 83 51 2683
7/30/1976 1976 7 30 60 77 102 89.5 57.5 2740.5
7/31/1976 1976 7 31 61 65 88 76.5 44.5 2785
8/1/1976 1976 8 1 62 64 88 76 44 2829
8/2/1976 1976 8 2 63 55 97 76 44 2873
8/3/1976 1976 8 3 64 68 98 83 51 2924
8/4/1976 1976 8 4 65 55 96 75.5 43.5 2967.5
8/5/1976 1976 8 5 66 48 93 70.5 38.5 3006
8/6/1976 1976 8 6 67 59 98 78.5 46.5 3052.5
8/7/1976 1976 8 7 68 67 101 84 52 3104.5
8/8/1976 1976 8 8 69 72 97 84.5 52.5 3157
8/9/1976 1976 8 9 70 54 91 72.5 40.5 3197.5
8/10/1976 1976 8 10 71 64 90 77 45 3242.5
8/11/1976 1976 8 11 72 64 96 80 48 3290.5
8/12/1976 1976 8 12 73 67 97 82 50 3340.5
8/13/1976 1976 8 13 74 68 98 83 51 3391.5
8/14/1976 1976 8 14 75 67 95 81 49 3440.5
8/15/1976 1976 8 15 76 69 92 80.5 48.5 3489
8/16/1976 1976 8 16 77 72 95 83.5 51.5 3540.5
8/17/1976 1976 8 17 78 68 90 79 47 3587.5
8/18/1976 1976 8 18 79 60 92 76 44 3631.5
8/19/1976 1976 8 19 80 59 97 78 46 3677.5
8/20/1976 1976 8 20 81 63 96 79.5 47.5 3725
8/21/1976 1976 8 21 82 66 100 83 51 3776
8/22/1976 1976 8 22 83 71 95 83 51 3827
8/23/1976 1976 8 23 84 67 92 79.5 47.5 3874.5
8/24/1976 1976 8 24 85 58 95 76.5 44.5 3919
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
8/25/1976 1976 8 25 86 80 100 90 58 3977
8/26/1976 1976 8 26 87 73 81 77 45 4022
8/27/1976 1976 8 27 88 62 89 75.5 43.5 4065.5
8/28/1976 1976 8 28 89 48 97 72.5 40.5 4106
8/29/1976 1976 8 29 90 60 94 77 45 4151
8/30/1976 1976 8 30 91 63 100 81.5 49.5 4200.5
8/31/1976 1976 8 31 92 58 95 76.5 44.5 4245
9/1/1976 1976 9 1 93 56 89 72.5 40.5 4285.5
9/2/1976 1976 9 2 94 47 96 71.5 39.5 4325
9/3/1976 1976 9 3 95 67 97 82 50 4375
9/4/1976 1976 9 4 96 48 96 72 40 4415
9/5/1976 1976 9 5 97 50 98 74 42 4457
9/6/1976 1976 9 6 98 61 80 70.5 38.5 4495.5
9/7/1976 1976 9 7 99 60 82 71 39 4534.5
9/8/1976 1976 9 8 100 52 88 70 38 4572.5
9/9/1976 1976 9 9 101 52 89 70.5 38.5 4611
9/10/1976 1976 9 10 102 62 77 69.5 37.5 4648.5
9/11/1976 1976 9 11 103 64 82 73 41 4689.5
9/12/1976 1976 9 12 104 68 85 76.5 44.5 4734
9/13/1976 1976 9 13 105 53 89 71 39 4773
9/14/1976 1976 9 14 106 54 86 70 38 4811
9/15/1976 1976 9 15 107 52 85 68.5 36.5 4847.5
9/16/1976 1976 9 16 108 58 89 73.5 41.5 4889
9/17/1976 1976 9 17 109 49 92 70.5 38.5 4927.5
9/18/1976 1976 9 18 110 52 82 67 35 4962.5
9/19/1976 1976 9 19 111 45 86 65.5 33.5 4996
9/20/1976 1976 9 20 112 53 92 72.5 40.5 5036.5
9/21/1976 1976 9 21 113 52 73 62.5 30.5 5067
9/22/1976 1976 9 22 114 45 82 63.5 31.5 5098.5
9/23/1976 1976 9 23 115 51 68 59.5 27.5 5126
9/24/1976 1976 9 24 116 58 77 67.5 35.5 5161.5
9/25/1976 1976 9 25 117 54 72 63 31 5192.5
9/26/1976 1976 9 26 118 52 58 55 23 5215.5
9/27/1976 1976 9 27 119 47 76 61.5 29.5 5245
9/28/1976 1976 9 28 120 53 77 65 33 5278
9/29/1976 1976 9 29 121 40 77 58.5 26.5 5304.5
9/30/1976 1976 9 30 122 40 85 62.5 30.5 5335
10/1/1976 1976 10 1 123 48 85 66.5 34.5 5369.5
10/2/1976 1976 10 2 124 58 67 62.5 30.5 5400
10/3/1976 1976 10 3 125 42 70 56 24 5424
10/4/1976 1976 10 4 126 34 70 52 20 5444
10/5/1976 1976 10 5 127 35 72 53.5 21.5 5465.5
10/6/1976 1976 10 6 128 42 74 58 26 5491.5
10/7/1976 1976 10 7 129 42 64 53 21 5512.5
10/8/1976 1976 10 8 130 25 73 49 17 5529.5
10/9/1976 1976 10 9 131 27 75 51 19 5548.5
10/10/1976 1976 10 10 132 35 78 56.5 24.5 5573
10/11/1976 1976 10 11 133 40 81 60.5 28.5 5601.5
10/12/1976 1976 10 12 134 40 80 60 28 5629.5
10/13/1976 1976 10 13 135 32 76 54 22 5651.5
10/14/1976 1976 10 14 136 29 79 54 22 5673.5
10/15/1976 1976 10 15 137 30 52 41 9 5682.5
10/16/1976 1976 10 16 138 36 80 58 26 5708.5
10/17/1976 1976 10 17 139 43 80 61.5 29.5 5738
10/18/1976 1976 10 18 140 30 62 46 14 5752
10/19/1976 1976 10 19 141 20 62 41 9 5761
10/20/1976 1976 10 20 142 28 59 43.5 11.5 5772.5
10/21/1976 1976 10 21 143 18 62 40 8 5780.5
10/22/1976 1976 10 22 144 30 69 49.5 17.5 5798
10/23/1976 1976 10 23 145 28 74 51 19 5817
10/24/1976 1976 10 24 146 31 70 50.5 18.5 5835.5
10/25/1976 1976 10 25 147 30 72 51 19 5854.5
10/26/1976 1976 10 26 148 34 55 44.5 12.5 5867
10/27/1976 1976 10 27 149 22 57 39.5 7.5 5874.5
10/28/1976 1976 10 28 150 18 60 39 7 5881.5
10/29/1976 1976 10 29 151 15 57 36 4 5885.5
10/30/1976 1976 10 30 152 50 64 57 25 5910.5
10/31/1976 1976 10 31 153 52 52 52 20 5930.5
11/2/1976 1976 11 2 155 44 52 48 16 5946.5
11/3/1976 1976 11 3 156 25 75 50 18 5964.5
11/4/1976 1976 11 4 157 25 69 47 15 5979.5
11/5/1976 1976 11 5 158 20 66 43 11 5990.5
11/6/1976 1976 11 6 159 19 69 44 12 6002.5
11/7/1976 1976 11 7 160 23 67 45 13 6015.5
11/8/1976 1976 11 8 161 21 68 44.5 12.5 6028
11/9/1976 1976 11 9 162 18 66 42 10 6038
11/10/1976 1976 11 10 163 22 61 41.5 9.5 6047.5
11/11/1976 1976 11 11 164 19 61 40 8 6055.5
11/12/1976 1976 11 12 165 20 57 38.5 6.5 6062
11/13/1976 1976 11 13 166 23 55 39 7 6069
11/14/1976 1976 11 14 167 22 55 38.5 6.5 6075.5
11/15/1976 1976 11 15 168 24 57 40.5 8.5 6084
11/16/1976 1976 11 16 169 32 65 48.5 16.5 6100.5
11/17/1976 1976 11 17 170 20 60 40 8 6108.5
11/18/1976 1976 11 18 171 20 58 39 7 6115.5
11/19/1976 1976 11 19 172 18 62 40 8 6123.5
11/20/1976 1976 11 20 173 19 66 42.5 10.5 6134
11/21/1976 1976 11 21 174 18 62 40 8 6142
11/22/1976 1976 11 22 175 15 59 37 5 6147
11/23/1976 1976 11 23 176 13 59 36 4 6151
11/24/1976 1976 11 24 177 12 53 32.5 0.5 6151.5
11/25/1976 1976 11 25 178 10 52 31 -1 6150.5
11/26/1976 1976 11 26 179 27 44 35.5 3.5 6154
11/27/1976 1976 11 27 180 6 65 35.5 3.5 6157.5
11/28/1976 1976 11 28 181 -7 28 10.5 -21.5 6136
11/29/1976 1976 11 29 182 8 38 23 -9 6127
11/30/1976 1976 11 30 183 13 42 27.5 -4.5 6122.5
12/1/1976 1976 12 1 184 7 47 27 -5 6117.5
12/2/1976 1976 12 2 185 5 50 27.5 -4.5 6113
12/3/1976 1976 12 3 186 7 40 23.5 -8.5 6104.5
12/4/1976 1976 12 4 187 8 38 23 -9 6095.5
12/5/1976 1976 12 5 188 22 49 35.5 3.5 6099
12/6/1976 1976 12 6 189 12 51 31.5 -0.5 6098.5
12/7/1976 1976 12 7 190 12 49 30.5 -1.5 6097
12/8/1976 1976 12 8 191 9 45 27 -5 6092
12/9/1976 1976 12 9 192 5 48 26.5 -5.5 6086.5
12/10/1976 1976 12 10 193 16 48 32 0 6086.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
12/11/1976 1976 12 11 194 5 50 27.5 -4.5 6082
12/12/1976 1976 12 12 195 5 48 26.5 -5.5 6076.5
12/13/1976 1976 12 13 196 3 32 17.5 -14.5 6062
12/14/1976 1976 12 14 197 8 65 36.5 4.5 6066.5
12/15/1976 1976 12 15 198 5 49 27 -5 6061.5
12/16/1976 1976 12 16 199 4 48 26 -6 6055.5
12/17/1976 1976 12 17 200 0 44 22 -10 6045.5
12/18/1976 1976 12 18 201 0 41 20.5 -11.5 6034
12/19/1976 1976 12 19 202 3 45 24 -8 6026
12/20/1976 1976 12 20 203 -2 42 20 -12 6014
12/21/1976 1976 12 21 204 -4 40 18 -14 6000
12/22/1976 1976 12 22 205 -4 42 19 -13 5987
12/23/1976 1976 12 23 206 5 18 11.5 -20.5 5966.5
12/24/1976 1976 12 24 207 18 42 30 -2 5964.5
12/25/1976 1976 12 25 208 3 42 22.5 -9.5 5955
12/26/1976 1976 12 26 209 3 44 23.5 -8.5 5946.5
12/27/1976 1976 12 27 210 7 41 24 -8 5938.5
12/28/1976 1976 12 28 211 -1 48 23.5 -8.5 5930
12/29/1976 1976 12 29 212 -2 35 16.5 -15.5 5914.5
12/30/1976 1976 12 30 213 8 37 22.5 -9.5 5905
12/31/1976 1976 12 31 214 12 45 28.5 -3.5 5901.5
1/1/1977 1977 1 1 215 12 45 28.5 -3.5 5898
1/2/1977 1977 1 2 216 8 50 29 -3 5895
1/3/1977 1977 1 3 217 35 42 38.5 6.5 5901.5
1/4/1977 1977 1 4 218 14 47 30.5 -1.5 5900
1/5/1977 1977 1 5 219 15 35 25 -7 5893
1/6/1977 1977 1 6 220 12 30 21 -11 5882
1/7/1977 1977 1 7 221 15 32 23.5 -8.5 5873.5
1/8/1977 1977 1 8 222 15 30 22.5 -9.5 5864
1/9/1977 1977 1 9 223 2 31 16.5 -15.5 5848.5
1/10/1977 1977 1 10 224 8 8 8 -24 5824.5
1/11/1977 1977 1 11 225 -5 24 9.5 -22.5 5802
1/12/1977 1977 1 12 226 -5 29 12 -20 5782
1/13/1977 1977 1 13 227 -3 32 14.5 -17.5 5764.5
1/14/1977 1977 1 14 228 -1 37 18 -14 5750.5
1/15/1977 1977 1 15 229 0 38 19 -13 5737.5
1/16/1977 1977 1 16 230 5 30 17.5 -14.5 5723
1/17/1977 1977 1 17 231 5 45 25 -7 5716
1/18/1977 1977 1 18 232 7 30 18.5 -13.5 5702.5
1/19/1977 1977 1 19 233 10 40 25 -7 5695.5
1/20/1977 1977 1 20 234 8 42 25 -7 5688.5
1/21/1977 1977 1 21 235 22 45 33.5 1.5 5690
1/22/1977 1977 1 22 236 33 41 37 5 5695
1/23/1977 1977 1 23 237 30 51 40.5 8.5 5703.5
1/24/1977 1977 1 24 238 18 48 33 1 5704.5
1/25/1977 1977 1 25 239 9 44 26.5 -5.5 5699
1/26/1977 1977 1 26 240 5 43 24 -8 5691
1/27/1977 1977 1 27 241 7 48 27.5 -4.5 5686.5
1/28/1977 1977 1 28 242 5 53 29 -3 5683.5
1/29/1977 1977 1 29 243 5 50 27.5 -4.5 5679
1/30/1977 1977 1 30 244 6 53 29.5 -2.5 5676.5
1/31/1977 1977 1 31 245 30 48 39 7 5683.5
2/1/1977 1977 2 1 246 24 50 37 5 5688.5
2/2/1977 1977 2 2 247 22 48 35 3 5691.5
2/3/1977 1977 2 3 248 8 53 30.5 -1.5 5690
2/4/1977 1977 2 4 249 5 55 30 -2 5688
2/5/1977 1977 2 5 250 19 53 36 4 5692
2/6/1977 1977 2 6 251 6 55 30.5 -1.5 5690.5
2/7/1977 1977 2 7 252 7 55 31 -1 5689.5
2/8/1977 1977 2 8 253 4 47 25.5 -6.5 5683
2/9/1977 1977 2 9 254 5 48 26.5 -5.5 5677.5
2/10/1977 1977 2 10 255 5 61 33 1 5678.5
2/11/1977 1977 2 11 256 15 58 36.5 4.5 5683
2/12/1977 1977 2 12 257 13 57 35 3 5686
2/13/1977 1977 2 13 258 17 64 40.5 8.5 5694.5
2/14/1977 1977 2 14 259 19 60 39.5 7.5 5702
2/15/1977 1977 2 15 260 15 62 38.5 6.5 5708.5
2/16/1977 1977 2 16 261 20 63 41.5 9.5 5718
2/17/1977 1977 2 17 262 19 66 42.5 10.5 5728.5
2/18/1977 1977 2 18 263 16 67 41.5 9.5 5738
2/19/1977 1977 2 19 264 16 66 41 9 5747
2/20/1977 1977 2 20 265 12 62 37 5 5752
2/21/1977 1977 2 21 266 24 60 42 10 5762
2/22/1977 1977 2 22 267 32 45 38.5 6.5 5768.5
2/23/1977 1977 2 23 268 24 54 39 7 5775.5
2/24/1977 1977 2 24 269 33 45 39 7 5782.5
2/25/1977 1977 2 25 270 20 45 32.5 0.5 5783
2/26/1977 1977 2 26 271 12 49 30.5 -1.5 5781.5
2/27/1977 1977 2 27 272 15 49 32 0 5781.5
2/28/1977 1977 2 28 273 10 53 31.5 -0.5 5781
3/1/1977 1977 3 1 274 15 57 36 4 5785
3/2/1977 1977 3 2 275 22 45 33.5 1.5 5786.5
3/3/1977 1977 3 3 276 15 50 32.5 0.5 5787
3/4/1977 1977 3 4 277 22 47 34.5 2.5 5789.5
3/5/1977 1977 3 5 278 7 50 28.5 -3.5 5786
3/6/1977 1977 3 6 279 10 56 33 1 5787
3/7/1977 1977 3 7 280 14 63 38.5 6.5 5793.5
3/8/1977 1977 3 8 281 25 69 47 15 5808.5
3/9/1977 1977 3 9 282 19 72 45.5 13.5 5822
3/10/1977 1977 3 10 283 34 45 39.5 7.5 5829.5
3/11/1977 1977 3 11 284 25 50 37.5 5.5 5835
3/12/1977 1977 3 12 285 12 54 33 1 5836
3/13/1977 1977 3 13 286 25 63 44 12 5848
3/14/1977 1977 3 14 287 20 49 34.5 2.5 5850.5
3/15/1977 1977 3 15 288 15 46 30.5 -1.5 5849
3/16/1977 1977 3 16 289 14 60 37 5 5854
3/17/1977 1977 3 17 290 38 56 47 15 5869
3/18/1977 1977 3 18 291 29 47 38 6 5875
3/19/1977 1977 3 19 292 10 59 34.5 2.5 5877.5
3/20/1977 1977 3 20 293 32 54 43 11 5888.5
3/21/1977 1977 3 21 294 18 59 38.5 6.5 5895
3/22/1977 1977 3 22 295 18 65 41.5 9.5 5904.5
3/23/1977 1977 3 23 296 28 69 48.5 16.5 5921
3/24/1977 1977 3 24 297 52 70 61 29 5950
3/25/1977 1977 3 25 298 40 57 48.5 16.5 5966.5
3/26/1977 1977 3 26 299 38 57 47.5 15.5 5982
3/27/1977 1977 3 27 300 29 68 48.5 16.5 5998.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
3/28/1977 1977 3 28 301 28 44 36 4 6002.5
3/29/1977 1977 3 29 302 24 42 33 1 6003.5
3/30/1977 1977 3 30 303 16 53 34.5 2.5 6006
3/31/1977 1977 3 31 304 25 62 43.5 11.5 6017.5
4/1/1977 1977 4 1 305 28 53 40.5 8.5 6026
4/2/1977 1977 4 2 306 30 50 40 8 6034
4/3/1977 1977 4 3 307 20 53 36.5 4.5 6038.5
4/4/1977 1977 4 4 308 32 66 49 17 6055.5
4/5/1977 1977 4 5 309 37 66 51.5 19.5 6075
4/6/1977 1977 4 6 310 34 75 54.5 22.5 6097.5
4/7/1977 1977 4 7 311 40 80 60 28 6125.5
4/8/1977 1977 4 8 312 42 84 63 31 6156.5
4/9/1977 1977 4 9 313 53 80 66.5 34.5 6191
4/10/1977 1977 4 10 314 49 77 63 31 6222
4/11/1977 1977 4 11 315 51 70 60.5 28.5 6250.5
4/12/1977 1977 4 12 316 48 70 59 27 6277.5
4/13/1977 1977 4 13 317 34 70 52 20 6297.5
4/14/1977 1977 4 14 318 44 77 60.5 28.5 6326
4/15/1977 1977 4 15 319 45 62 53.5 21.5 6347.5
4/16/1977 1977 4 16 320 46 75 60.5 28.5 6376
4/17/1977 1977 4 17 321 45 80 62.5 30.5 6406.5
4/18/1977 1977 4 18 322 50 84 67 35 6441.5
4/19/1977 1977 4 19 323 48 64 56 24 6465.5
4/20/1977 1977 4 20 324 29 65 47 15 6480.5
4/21/1977 1977 4 21 325 29 75 52 20 6500.5
4/22/1977 1977 4 22 326 42 82 62 30 6530.5
4/23/1977 1977 4 23 327 43 84 63.5 31.5 6562
4/24/1977 1977 4 24 328 42 83 62.5 30.5 6592.5
4/25/1977 1977 4 25 329 45 86 65.5 33.5 6626
4/26/1977 1977 4 26 330 45 88 66.5 34.5 6660.5
4/27/1977 1977 4 27 331 60 90 75 43 6703.5
4/28/1977 1977 4 28 332 58 77 67.5 35.5 6739
4/29/1977 1977 4 29 333 44 85 64.5 32.5 6771.5
4/30/1977 1977 4 30 334 46 81 63.5 31.5 6803
5/1/1977 1977 5 1 335 61 80 70.5 38.5 6841.5
5/2/1977 1977 5 2 336 43 85 64 32 6873.5
5/3/1977 1977 5 3 337 42 76 59 27 6900.5
5/4/1977 1977 5 4 338 56 82 69 37 6937.5
5/5/1977 1977 5 5 339 59 81 70 38 6975.5
5/6/1977 1977 5 6 340 59 75 67 35 7010.5
5/7/1977 1977 5 7 341 52 79 65.5 33.5 7044
5/8/1977 1977 5 8 342 68 79 73.5 41.5 7085.5
5/9/1977 1977 5 9 343 55 87 71 39 7124.5
5/10/1977 1977 5 10 344 47 70 58.5 26.5 7151
5/11/1977 1977 5 11 345 35 80 57.5 25.5 7176.5
5/12/1977 1977 5 12 346 67 67 67 35 7211.5
5/13/1977 1977 5 13 347 50 59 54.5 22.5 7234
5/14/1977 1977 5 14 348 39 72 55.5 23.5 7257.5
5/15/1977 1977 5 15 349 52 72 62 30 7287.5
5/16/1977 1977 5 16 350 42 72 57 25 7312.5
5/17/1977 1977 5 17 351 47 66 56.5 24.5 7337
5/18/1977 1977 5 18 352 42 65 53.5 21.5 7358.5
5/19/1977 1977 5 19 353 48 73 60.5 28.5 7387
5/20/1977 1977 5 20 354 53 68 60.5 28.5 7415.5
5/21/1977 1977 5 21 355 53 77 65 33 7448.5
5/22/1977 1977 5 22 356 57 88 72.5 40.5 7489
5/23/1977 1977 5 23 357 66 85 75.5 43.5 7532.5
5/24/1977 1977 5 24 358 56 63 59.5 27.5 7560
5/25/1977 1977 5 25 359 48 67 57.5 25.5 7585.5
5/26/1977 1977 5 26 360 48 76 62 30 7615.5
5/27/1977 1977 5 27 361 60 84 72 40 7655.5
5/28/1977 1977 5 28 362 55 82 68.5 36.5 7692
5/29/1977 1977 5 29 363 60 87 73.5 41.5 7733.5
5/30/1977 1977 5 30 364 62 88 75 43 7776.5
5/31/1977 1977 5 31 365 48 95 71.5 39.5 7816
6/1/1977 1977 6 1 1 70 103 86.5 54.5 54.5
6/2/1977 1977 6 2 2 56 94 75 43 97.5
6/3/1977 1977 6 3 3 66 102 84 52 149.5
6/4/1977 1977 6 4 4 71 97 84 52 201.5
6/5/1977 1977 6 5 5 66 101 83.5 51.5 253
6/6/1977 1977 6 6 6 76 93 84.5 52.5 305.5
6/7/1977 1977 6 7 7 61 99 80 48 353.5
6/8/1977 1977 6 8 8 69 92 80.5 48.5 402
6/9/1977 1977 6 9 9 66 93 79.5 47.5 449.5
6/10/1977 1977 6 10 10 66 91 78.5 46.5 496
6/11/1977 1977 6 11 11 63 93 78 46 542
6/12/1977 1977 6 12 12 48 95 71.5 39.5 581.5
6/13/1977 1977 6 13 13 50 95 72.5 40.5 622
6/14/1977 1977 6 14 14 69 99 84 52 674
6/15/1977 1977 6 15 15 73 98 85.5 53.5 727.5
6/16/1977 1977 6 16 16 72 100 86 54 781.5
6/17/1977 1977 6 17 17 66 100 83 51 832.5
6/18/1977 1977 6 18 18 75 97 86 54 886.5
6/19/1977 1977 6 19 19 50 97 73.5 41.5 928
6/20/1977 1977 6 20 20 69 92 80.5 48.5 976.5
6/21/1977 1977 6 21 21 53 94 73.5 41.5 1018
6/22/1977 1977 6 22 22 70 94 82 50 1068
6/23/1977 1977 6 23 23 59 97 78 46 1114
6/24/1977 1977 6 24 24 66 100 83 51 1165
6/25/1977 1977 6 25 25 64 97 80.5 48.5 1213.5
6/26/1977 1977 6 26 26 77 100 88.5 56.5 1270
6/27/1977 1977 6 27 27 82 103 92.5 60.5 1330.5
6/28/1977 1977 6 28 28 82 100 91 59 1389.5
6/29/1977 1977 6 29 29 66 101 83.5 51.5 1441
6/30/1977 1977 6 30 30 80 103 91.5 59.5 1500.5
7/1/1977 1977 7 1 31 68 94 81 49 1549.5
7/2/1977 1977 7 2 32 58 95 76.5 44.5 1594
7/3/1977 1977 7 3 33 73 91 82 50 1644
7/4/1977 1977 7 4 34 66 86 76 44 1688
7/5/1977 1977 7 5 35 72 97 84.5 52.5 1740.5
7/6/1977 1977 7 6 36 72 100 86 54 1794.5
7/7/1977 1977 7 7 37 55 99 77 45 1839.5
7/8/1977 1977 7 8 38 68 100 84 52 1891.5
7/9/1977 1977 7 9 39 58 103 80.5 48.5 1940
7/10/1977 1977 7 10 40 66 102 84 52 1992
7/11/1977 1977 7 11 41 77 102 89.5 57.5 2049.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
7/12/1977 1977 7 12 42 76 104 90 58 2107.5
7/13/1977 1977 7 13 43 76 102 89 57 2164.5
7/14/1977 1977 7 14 44 58 104 81 49 2213.5
7/15/1977 1977 7 15 45 82 102 92 60 2273.5
7/16/1977 1977 7 16 46 88 104 96 64 2337.5
7/17/1977 1977 7 17 47 80 100 90 58 2395.5
7/18/1977 1977 7 18 48 78 100 89 57 2452.5
7/19/1977 1977 7 19 49 75 85 80 48 2500.5
7/20/1977 1977 7 20 50 70 97 83.5 51.5 2552
7/21/1977 1977 7 21 51 57 97 77 45 2597
7/22/1977 1977 7 22 52 70 83 76.5 44.5 2641.5
7/23/1977 1977 7 23 53 67 92 79.5 47.5 2689
7/24/1977 1977 7 24 54 70 82 76 44 2733
7/25/1977 1977 7 25 55 67 90 78.5 46.5 2779.5
7/26/1977 1977 7 26 56 59 97 78 46 2825.5
7/27/1977 1977 7 27 57 75 95 85 53 2878.5
7/28/1977 1977 7 28 58 72 95 83.5 51.5 2930
7/29/1977 1977 7 29 59 56 97 76.5 44.5 2974.5
7/30/1977 1977 7 30 60 72 103 87.5 55.5 3030
7/31/1977 1977 7 31 61 65 99 82 50 3080
8/1/1977 1977 8 1 62 61 99 80 48 3128
8/2/1977 1977 8 2 63 68 103 85.5 53.5 3181.5
8/3/1977 1977 8 3 64 80 104 92 60 3241.5
8/4/1977 1977 8 4 65 75 101 88 56 3297.5
8/5/1977 1977 8 5 66 63 100 81.5 49.5 3347
8/6/1977 1977 8 6 67 75 105 90 58 3405
8/7/1977 1977 8 7 68 80 105 92.5 60.5 3465.5
8/8/1977 1977 8 8 69 68 101 84.5 52.5 3518
8/9/1977 1977 8 9 70 69 103 86 54 3572
8/10/1977 1977 8 10 71 70 95 82.5 50.5 3622.5
8/11/1977 1977 8 11 72 68 101 84.5 52.5 3675
8/12/1977 1977 8 12 73 75 85 80 48 3723
8/13/1977 1977 8 13 74 63 100 81.5 49.5 3772.5
8/14/1977 1977 8 14 75 75 103 89 57 3829.5
8/15/1977 1977 8 15 76 71 90 80.5 48.5 3878
8/16/1977 1977 8 16 77 67 91 79 47 3925
8/17/1977 1977 8 17 78 68 85 76.5 44.5 3969.5
8/18/1977 1977 8 18 79 66 95 80.5 48.5 4018
8/19/1977 1977 8 19 80 71 95 83 51 4069
8/20/1977 1977 8 20 81 65 95 80 48 4117
8/21/1977 1977 8 21 82 61 99 80 48 4165
8/22/1977 1977 8 22 83 75 96 85.5 53.5 4218.5
8/23/1977 1977 8 23 84 62 96 79 47 4265.5
8/24/1977 1977 8 24 85 73 96 84.5 52.5 4318
8/25/1977 1977 8 25 86 63 96 79.5 47.5 4365.5
8/26/1977 1977 8 26 87 68 97 82.5 50.5 4416
8/27/1977 1977 8 27 88 52 77 64.5 32.5 4448.5
8/28/1977 1977 8 28 89 58 75 66.5 34.5 4483
8/29/1977 1977 8 29 90 67 78 72.5 40.5 4523.5
8/30/1977 1977 8 30 91 54 95 74.5 42.5 4566
8/31/1977 1977 8 31 92 62 100 81 49 4615
9/1/1977 1977 9 1 93 61 95 78 46 4661
9/2/1977 1977 9 2 94 54 97 75.5 43.5 4704.5
9/3/1977 1977 9 3 95 67 91 79 47 4751.5
9/4/1977 1977 9 4 96 58 93 75.5 43.5 4795
9/5/1977 1977 9 5 97 51 95 73 41 4836
9/6/1977 1977 9 6 98 63 84 73.5 41.5 4877.5
9/7/1977 1977 9 7 99 61 103 82 50 4927.5
9/8/1977 1977 9 8 100 61 98 79.5 47.5 4975
9/9/1977 1977 9 9 101 52 97 74.5 42.5 5017.5
9/10/1977 1977 9 10 102 59 88 73.5 41.5 5059
9/11/1977 1977 9 11 103 59 82 70.5 38.5 5097.5
9/12/1977 1977 9 12 104 55 81 68 36 5133.5
9/13/1977 1977 9 13 105 58 82 70 38 5171.5
9/14/1977 1977 9 14 106 47 79 63 31 5202.5
9/15/1977 1977 9 15 107 49 88 68.5 36.5 5239
9/16/1977 1977 9 16 108 60 76 68 36 5275
9/17/1977 1977 9 17 109 61 81 71 39 5314
9/18/1977 1977 9 18 110 42 82 62 30 5344
9/19/1977 1977 9 19 111 51 85 68 36 5380
9/20/1977 1977 9 20 112 66 82 74 42 5422
9/21/1977 1977 9 21 113 48 70 59 27 5449
9/22/1977 1977 9 22 114 47 84 65.5 33.5 5482.5
9/23/1977 1977 9 23 115 49 72 60.5 28.5 5511
9/24/1977 1977 9 24 116 35 92 63.5 31.5 5542.5
9/25/1977 1977 9 25 117 48 92 70 38 5580.5
9/26/1977 1977 9 26 118 64 93 78.5 46.5 5627
9/27/1977 1977 9 27 119 55 88 71.5 39.5 5666.5
9/28/1977 1977 9 28 120 58 77 67.5 35.5 5702
9/29/1977 1977 9 29 121 57 87 72 40 5742
9/30/1977 1977 9 30 122 45 67 56 24 5766
10/1/1977 1977 10 1 123 32 67 49.5 17.5 5783.5
10/2/1977 1977 10 2 124 37 71 54 22 5805.5
10/3/1977 1977 10 3 125 40 87 63.5 31.5 5837
10/4/1977 1977 10 4 126 43 85 64 32 5869
10/5/1977 1977 10 5 127 53 81 67 35 5904
10/6/1977 1977 10 6 128 55 75 65 33 5937
10/7/1977 1977 10 7 129 46 72 59 27 5964
10/8/1977 1977 10 8 130 33 67 50 18 5982
10/9/1977 1977 10 9 131 39 75 57 25 6007
10/10/1977 1977 10 10 132 35 66 50.5 18.5 6025.5
10/11/1977 1977 10 11 133 32 66 49 17 6042.5
10/12/1977 1977 10 12 134 28 67 47.5 15.5 6058
10/13/1977 1977 10 13 135 30 50 40 8 6066
10/14/1977 1977 10 14 136 32 78 55 23 6089
10/15/1977 1977 10 15 137 35 77 56 24 6113
10/16/1977 1977 10 16 138 34 78 56 24 6137
10/17/1977 1977 10 17 139 35 80 57.5 25.5 6162.5
10/18/1977 1977 10 18 140 33 77 55 23 6185.5
10/19/1977 1977 10 19 141 35 76 55.5 23.5 6209
10/20/1977 1977 10 20 142 50 77 63.5 31.5 6240.5
10/21/1977 1977 10 21 143 38 70 54 22 6262.5
10/22/1977 1977 10 22 144 35 70 52.5 20.5 6283
10/23/1977 1977 10 23 145 29 60 44.5 12.5 6295.5
10/24/1977 1977 10 24 146 30 72 51 19 6314.5
10/25/1977 1977 10 25 147 40 75 57.5 25.5 6340
10/26/1977 1977 10 26 148 44 72 58 26 6366
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
10/27/1977 1977 10 27 149 33 74 53.5 21.5 6387.5
10/28/1977 1977 10 28 150 57 77 67 35 6422.5
10/29/1977 1977 10 29 151 58 71 64.5 32.5 6455
10/30/1977 1977 10 30 152 35 67 51 19 6474
10/31/1977 1977 10 31 153 28 56 42 10 6484
11/1/1977 1977 11 1 154 20 55 37.5 5.5 6489.5
11/2/1977 1977 11 2 155 20 59 39.5 7.5 6497
11/3/1977 1977 11 3 156 22 61 41.5 9.5 6506.5
11/4/1977 1977 11 4 157 28 68 48 16 6522.5
11/5/1977 1977 11 5 158 42 75 58.5 26.5 6549
11/6/1977 1977 11 6 159 42 52 47 15 6564
11/7/1977 1977 11 7 160 45 63 54 22 6586
11/8/1977 1977 11 8 161 34 45 39.5 7.5 6593.5
11/9/1977 1977 11 9 162 15 44 29.5 -2.5 6591
11/10/1977 1977 11 10 163 15 50 32.5 0.5 6591.5
11/11/1977 1977 11 11 164 19 51 35 3 6594.5
11/12/1977 1977 11 12 165 24 58 41 9 6603.5
11/13/1977 1977 11 13 166 18 55 36.5 4.5 6608
11/14/1977 1977 11 14 167 18 60 39 7 6615
11/15/1977 1977 11 15 168 27 54 40.5 8.5 6623.5
11/16/1977 1977 11 16 169 23 70 46.5 14.5 6638
11/17/1977 1977 11 17 170 24 61 42.5 10.5 6648.5
11/18/1977 1977 11 18 171 41 58 49.5 17.5 6666
11/19/1977 1977 11 19 172 30 56 43 11 6677
11/20/1977 1977 11 20 173 9 34 21.5 -10.5 6666.5
11/21/1977 1977 11 21 174 18 33 25.5 -6.5 6660
11/22/1977 1977 11 22 175 24 47 35.5 3.5 6663.5
11/23/1977 1977 11 23 176 27 54 40.5 8.5 6672
11/24/1977 1977 11 24 177 22 36 29 -3 6669
11/25/1977 1977 11 25 178 24 63 43.5 11.5 6680.5
11/26/1977 1977 11 26 179 24 67 45.5 13.5 6694
11/27/1977 1977 11 27 180 30 55 42.5 10.5 6704.5
11/28/1977 1977 11 28 181 32 55 43.5 11.5 6716
11/29/1977 1977 11 29 182 17 48 32.5 0.5 6716.5
11/30/1977 1977 11 30 183 18 53 35.5 3.5 6720
12/1/1977 1977 12 1 184 18 50 34 2 6722
12/2/1977 1977 12 2 185 20 63 41.5 9.5 6731.5
12/3/1977 1977 12 3 186 23 62 42.5 10.5 6742
12/4/1977 1977 12 4 187 24 65 44.5 12.5 6754.5
12/5/1977 1977 12 5 188 34 61 47.5 15.5 6770
12/6/1977 1977 12 6 189 25 55 40 8 6778
12/7/1977 1977 12 7 190 15 55 35 3 6781
12/8/1977 1977 12 8 191 25 54 39.5 7.5 6788.5
12/9/1977 1977 12 9 192 18 53 35.5 3.5 6792
12/10/1977 1977 12 10 193 15 54 34.5 2.5 6794.5
12/11/1977 1977 12 11 194 10 48 29 -3 6791.5
12/12/1977 1977 12 12 195 29 52 40.5 8.5 6800
12/13/1977 1977 12 13 196 14 50 32 0 6800
12/14/1977 1977 12 14 197 18 50 34 2 6802
12/15/1977 1977 12 15 198 27 60 43.5 11.5 6813.5
12/16/1977 1977 12 16 199 25 42 33.5 1.5 6815
12/17/1977 1977 12 17 200 20 40 30 -2 6813
12/18/1977 1977 12 18 201 37 45 41 9 6822
12/19/1977 1977 12 19 202 20 41 30.5 -1.5 6820.5
12/20/1977 1977 12 20 203 7 25 16 -16 6804.5
12/21/1977 1977 12 21 204 4 26 15 -17 6787.5
12/22/1977 1977 12 22 205 12 37 24.5 -7.5 6780
12/23/1977 1977 12 23 206 5 30 17.5 -14.5 6765.5
12/24/1977 1977 12 24 207 8 47 27.5 -4.5 6761
12/25/1977 1977 12 25 208 7 46 26.5 -5.5 6755.5
12/26/1977 1977 12 26 209 7 44 25.5 -6.5 6749
12/27/1977 1977 12 27 210 27 39 33 1 6750
12/28/1977 1977 12 28 211 32 42 37 5 6755
12/29/1977 1977 12 29 212 32 40 36 4 6759
12/30/1977 1977 12 30 213 35 50 42.5 10.5 6769.5
12/31/1977 1977 12 31 214 28 46 37 5 6774.5
1/1/1978 1978 1 1 215 12 39 25.5 -6.5 6768
1/2/1978 1978 1 2 216 10 36 23 -9 6759
1/3/1978 1978 1 3 217 24 42 33 1 6760
1/4/1978 1978 1 4 218 25 42 33.5 1.5 6761.5
1/5/1978 1978 1 5 219 23 50 36.5 4.5 6766
1/6/1978 1978 1 6 220 30 49 39.5 7.5 6773.5
1/7/1978 1978 1 7 221 14 48 31 -1 6772.5
1/8/1978 1978 1 8 222 12 44 28 -4 6768.5
1/9/1978 1978 1 9 223 19 40 29.5 -2.5 6766
1/10/1978 1978 1 10 224 32 37 34.5 2.5 6768.5
1/11/1978 1978 1 11 225 30 40 35 3 6771.5
1/12/1978 1978 1 12 226 29 37 33 1 6772.5
1/13/1978 1978 1 13 227 20 35 27.5 -4.5 6768
1/14/1978 1978 1 14 228 28 34 31 -1 6767
1/15/1978 1978 1 15 229 30 38 34 2 6769
1/16/1978 1978 1 16 230 22 40 31 -1 6768
1/17/1978 1978 1 17 231 30 47 38.5 6.5 6774.5
1/18/1978 1978 1 18 232 21 47 34 2 6776.5
1/19/1978 1978 1 19 233 27 34 30.5 -1.5 6775
1/20/1978 1978 1 20 234 21 42 31.5 -0.5 6774.5
1/21/1978 1978 1 21 235 22 30 26 -6 6768.5
1/22/1978 1978 1 22 236 18 32 25 -7 6761.5
1/23/1978 1978 1 23 237 25 30 27.5 -4.5 6757
1/24/1978 1978 1 24 238 1 36 18.5 -13.5 6743.5
1/25/1978 1978 1 25 239 -8 22 7 -25 6718.5
1/26/1978 1978 1 26 240 6 37 21.5 -10.5 6708
1/27/1978 1978 1 27 241 -2 16 7 -25 6683
1/28/1978 1978 1 28 242 0 30 15 -17 6666
1/29/1978 1978 1 29 243 8 37 22.5 -9.5 6656.5
1/30/1978 1978 1 30 244 0 35 17.5 -14.5 6642
1/31/1978 1978 1 31 245 25 39 32 0 6642
2/1/1978 1978 2 1 246 31 43 37 5 6647
2/2/1978 1978 2 2 247 32 42 37 5 6652
2/3/1978 1978 2 3 248 33 39 36 4 6656
2/4/1978 1978 2 4 249 32 36 34 2 6658
2/5/1978 1978 2 5 250 30 36 33 1 6659
2/6/1978 1978 2 6 251 30 36 33 1 6660
2/7/1978 1978 2 7 252 35 40 37.5 5.5 6665.5
2/8/1978 1978 2 8 253 31 48 39.5 7.5 6673
2/9/1978 1978 2 9 254 32 37 34.5 2.5 6675.5
2/10/1978 1978 2 10 255 35 48 41.5 9.5 6685
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
2/11/1978 1978 2 11 256 33 47 40 8 6693
2/12/1978 1978 2 12 257 26 49 37.5 5.5 6698.5
2/13/1978 1978 2 13 258 21 35 28 -4 6694.5
2/14/1978 1978 2 14 259 28 46 37 5 6699.5
2/15/1978 1978 2 15 260 20 48 34 2 6701.5
2/16/1978 1978 2 16 261 25 40 32.5 0.5 6702
2/17/1978 1978 2 17 262 15 38 26.5 -5.5 6696.5
2/18/1978 1978 2 18 263 13 40 26.5 -5.5 6691
2/19/1978 1978 2 19 264 18 45 31.5 -0.5 6690.5
2/20/1978 1978 2 20 265 29 53 41 9 6699.5
2/21/1978 1978 2 21 266 22 48 35 3 6702.5
2/22/1978 1978 2 22 267 20 49 34.5 2.5 6705
2/23/1978 1978 2 23 268 20 50 35 3 6708
2/24/1978 1978 2 24 269 20 52 36 4 6712
2/25/1978 1978 2 25 270 27 53 40 8 6720
2/26/1978 1978 2 26 271 29 55 42 10 6730
2/27/1978 1978 2 27 272 45 53 49 17 6747
2/28/1978 1978 2 28 273 35 52 43.5 11.5 6758.5
3/1/1978 1978 3 1 274 40 57 48.5 16.5 6775
3/2/1978 1978 3 2 275 40 65 52.5 20.5 6795.5
3/3/1978 1978 3 3 276 39 58 48.5 16.5 6812
3/4/1978 1978 3 4 277 45 48 46.5 14.5 6826.5
3/5/1978 1978 3 5 278 43 51 47 15 6841.5
3/6/1978 1978 3 6 279 32 60 46 14 6855.5
3/7/1978 1978 3 7 280 33 58 45.5 13.5 6869
3/8/1978 1978 3 8 281 25 60 42.5 10.5 6879.5
3/9/1978 1978 3 9 282 37 63 50 18 6897.5
3/10/1978 1978 3 10 283 43 56 49.5 17.5 6915
3/11/1978 1978 3 11 284 35 60 47.5 15.5 6930.5
3/12/1978 1978 3 12 285 37 56 46.5 14.5 6945
3/13/1978 1978 3 13 286 43 52 47.5 15.5 6960.5
3/14/1978 1978 3 14 287 34 49 41.5 9.5 6970
3/15/1978 1978 3 15 288 24 53 38.5 6.5 6976.5
3/16/1978 1978 3 16 289 28 60 44 12 6988.5
3/17/1978 1978 3 17 290 28 65 46.5 14.5 7003
3/18/1978 1978 3 18 291 28 66 47 15 7018
3/19/1978 1978 3 19 292 43 59 51 19 7037
3/20/1978 1978 3 20 293 35 72 53.5 21.5 7058.5
3/21/1978 1978 3 21 294 40 73 56.5 24.5 7083
3/22/1978 1978 3 22 295 52 70 61 29 7112
3/23/1978 1978 3 23 296 43 65 54 22 7134
3/24/1978 1978 3 24 297 43 64 53.5 21.5 7155.5
3/25/1978 1978 3 25 298 40 65 52.5 20.5 7176
3/26/1978 1978 3 26 299 28 70 49 17 7193
3/27/1978 1978 3 27 300 40 76 58 26 7219
3/28/1978 1978 3 28 301 47 75 61 29 7248
3/29/1978 1978 3 29 302 43 79 61 29 7277
3/30/1978 1978 3 30 303 41 78 59.5 27.5 7304.5
3/31/1978 1978 3 31 304 51 72 61.5 29.5 7334
4/1/1978 1978 4 1 305 52 65 58.5 26.5 7360.5
4/2/1978 1978 4 2 306 48 57 52.5 20.5 7381
4/3/1978 1978 4 3 307 30 66 48 16 7397
4/4/1978 1978 4 4 308 42 71 56.5 24.5 7421.5
4/5/1978 1978 4 5 309 50 65 57.5 25.5 7447
4/6/1978 1978 4 6 310 52 71 61.5 29.5 7476.5
4/7/1978 1978 4 7 311 48 77 62.5 30.5 7507
4/8/1978 1978 4 8 312 43 57 50 18 7525
4/9/1978 1978 4 9 313 36 52 44 12 7537
4/10/1978 1978 4 10 314 38 66 52 20 7557
4/11/1978 1978 4 11 315 45 78 61.5 29.5 7586.5
4/12/1978 1978 4 12 316 48 75 61.5 29.5 7616
4/13/1978 1978 4 13 317 54 76 65 33 7649
4/14/1978 1978 4 14 318 60 75 67.5 35.5 7684.5
4/15/1978 1978 4 15 319 54 70 62 30 7714.5
4/16/1978 1978 4 16 320 48 60 54 22 7736.5
4/17/1978 1978 4 17 321 42 53 47.5 15.5 7752
4/18/1978 1978 4 18 322 26 65 45.5 13.5 7765.5
4/19/1978 1978 4 19 323 45 72 58.5 26.5 7792
4/20/1978 1978 4 20 324 42 77 59.5 27.5 7819.5
4/21/1978 1978 4 21 325 42 54 48 16 7835.5
4/22/1978 1978 4 22 326 42 62 52 20 7855.5
4/23/1978 1978 4 23 327 45 77 61 29 7884.5
4/24/1978 1978 4 24 328 50 80 65 33 7917.5
4/25/1978 1978 4 25 329 53 78 65.5 33.5 7951
4/26/1978 1978 4 26 330 63 78 70.5 38.5 7989.5
4/27/1978 1978 4 27 331 54 67 60.5 28.5 8018
4/28/1978 1978 4 28 332 56 75 65.5 33.5 8051.5
4/29/1978 1978 4 29 333 49 65 57 25 8076.5
4/30/1978 1978 4 30 334 45 72 58.5 26.5 8103
5/1/1978 1978 5 1 335 47 55 51 19 8122
5/2/1978 1978 5 2 336 48 70 59 27 8149
5/3/1978 1978 5 3 337 59 72 65.5 33.5 8182.5
5/4/1978 1978 5 4 338 45 60 52.5 20.5 8203
5/5/1978 1978 5 5 339 40 52 46 14 8217
5/6/1978 1978 5 6 340 42 55 48.5 16.5 8233.5
5/7/1978 1978 5 7 341 36 59 47.5 15.5 8249
5/8/1978 1978 5 8 342 48 68 58 26 8275
5/9/1978 1978 5 9 343 50 75 62.5 30.5 8305.5
5/10/1978 1978 5 10 344 63 87 75 43 8348.5
5/11/1978 1978 5 11 345 58 85 71.5 39.5 8388
5/12/1978 1978 5 12 346 55 80 67.5 35.5 8423.5
5/13/1978 1978 5 13 347 57 90 73.5 41.5 8465
5/14/1978 1978 5 14 348 58 96 77 45 8510
5/15/1978 1978 5 15 349 70 72 71 39 8549
5/16/1978 1978 5 16 350 48 59 53.5 21.5 8570.5
5/17/1978 1978 5 17 351 50 63 56.5 24.5 8595
5/18/1978 1978 5 18 352 52 75 63.5 31.5 8626.5
5/19/1978 1978 5 19 353 54 82 68 36 8662.5
5/20/1978 1978 5 20 354 55 87 71 39 8701.5
5/21/1978 1978 5 21 355 60 83 71.5 39.5 8741
5/22/1978 1978 5 22 356 45 87 66 34 8775
5/23/1978 1978 5 23 357 65 88 76.5 44.5 8819.5
5/24/1978 1978 5 24 358 62 77 69.5 37.5 8857
5/25/1978 1978 5 25 359 55 80 67.5 35.5 8892.5
5/26/1978 1978 5 26 360 58 81 69.5 37.5 8930
5/27/1978 1978 5 27 361 45 75 60 28 8958
5/28/1978 1978 5 28 362 59 82 70.5 38.5 8996.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
5/29/1978 1978 5 29 363 58 88 73 41 9037.5
5/30/1978 1978 5 30 364 65 90 77.5 45.5 9083
5/31/1978 1978 5 31 365 57 77 67 35 9118
6/1/1978 1978 6 1 1 57 82 69.5 37.5 37.5
6/2/1978 1978 6 2 2 58 91 74.5 42.5 80
6/3/1978 1978 6 3 3 52 90 71 39 119
6/4/1978 1978 6 4 4 54 80 67 35 154
6/5/1978 1978 6 5 5 70 75 72.5 40.5 194.5
6/6/1978 1978 6 6 6 75 85 80 48 242.5
6/7/1978 1978 6 7 7 67 91 79 47 289.5
6/8/1978 1978 6 8 8 67 92 79.5 47.5 337
6/9/1978 1978 6 9 9 68 104 86 54 391
6/10/1978 1978 6 10 10 80 92 86 54 445
6/11/1978 1978 6 11 11 60 87 73.5 41.5 486.5
6/12/1978 1978 6 12 12 67 100 83.5 51.5 538
6/13/1978 1978 6 13 13 71 98 84.5 52.5 590.5
6/14/1978 1978 6 14 14 68 94 81 49 639.5
6/15/1978 1978 6 15 15 65 97 81 49 688.5
6/16/1978 1978 6 16 16 84 95 89.5 57.5 746
6/17/1978 1978 6 17 17 66 87 76.5 44.5 790.5
6/18/1978 1978 6 18 18 50 93 71.5 39.5 830
6/19/1978 1978 6 19 19 70 92 81 49 879
6/20/1978 1978 6 20 20 51 93 72 40 919
6/21/1978 1978 6 21 21 80 105 92.5 60.5 979.5
6/22/1978 1978 6 22 22 77 100 88.5 56.5 1036
6/23/1978 1978 6 23 23 85 104 94.5 62.5 1098.5
6/24/1978 1978 6 24 24 57 57 57 25 1123.5
6/25/1978 1978 6 25 25 69 92 80.5 48.5 1172
6/26/1978 1978 6 26 26 67 91 79 47 1219
6/27/1978 1978 6 27 27 85 96 90.5 58.5 1277.5
6/28/1978 1978 6 28 28 80 80 80 48 1325.5
6/29/1978 1978 6 29 29 77 77 77 45 1370.5
6/30/1978 1978 6 30 30 76 97 86.5 54.5 1425
7/1/1978 1978 7 1 31 76 98 87 55 1480
7/2/1978 1978 7 2 32 70 97 83.5 51.5 1531.5
7/3/1978 1978 7 3 33 83 100 91.5 59.5 1591
7/4/1978 1978 7 4 34 67 94 80.5 48.5 1639.5
7/5/1978 1978 7 5 35 65 84 74.5 42.5 1682
7/6/1978 1978 7 6 36 67 95 81 49 1731
7/7/1978 1978 7 7 37 53 100 76.5 44.5 1775.5
7/8/1978 1978 7 8 38 73 101 87 55 1830.5
7/9/1978 1978 7 9 39 71 103 87 55 1885.5
7/10/1978 1978 7 10 40 70 90 80 48 1933.5
7/11/1978 1978 7 11 41 69 101 85 53 1986.5
7/12/1978 1978 7 12 42 55 103 79 47 2033.5
7/13/1978 1978 7 13 43 73 104 88.5 56.5 2090
7/14/1978 1978 7 14 44 76 107 91.5 59.5 2149.5
7/15/1978 1978 7 15 45 83 99 91 59 2208.5
7/16/1978 1978 7 16 46 67 97 82 50 2258.5
7/17/1978 1978 7 17 47 60 84 72 40 2298.5
7/18/1978 1978 7 18 48 64 84 74 42 2340.5
7/19/1978 1978 7 19 49 76 100 88 56 2396.5
7/20/1978 1978 7 20 50 72 104 88 56 2452.5
7/21/1978 1978 7 21 51 74 92 83 51 2503.5
7/22/1978 1978 7 22 52 67 95 81 49 2552.5
7/23/1978 1978 7 23 53 67 102 84.5 52.5 2605
7/24/1978 1978 7 24 54 78 100 89 57 2662
7/25/1978 1978 7 25 55 70 105 87.5 55.5 2717.5
7/26/1978 1978 7 26 56 72 105 88.5 56.5 2774
7/27/1978 1978 7 27 57 75 109 92 60 2834
7/28/1978 1978 7 28 58 66 97 81.5 49.5 2883.5
7/29/1978 1978 7 29 59 65 85 75 43 2926.5
7/30/1978 1978 7 30 60 74 102 88 56 2982.5
7/31/1978 1978 7 31 61 65 95 80 48 3030.5
8/1/1978 1978 8 1 62 60 93 76.5 44.5 3075
8/2/1978 1978 8 2 63 60 97 78.5 46.5 3121.5
8/3/1978 1978 8 3 64 70 101 85.5 53.5 3175
8/4/1978 1978 8 4 65 69 98 83.5 51.5 3226.5
8/5/1978 1978 8 5 66 68 99 83.5 51.5 3278
8/6/1978 1978 8 6 67 77 105 91 59 3337
8/7/1978 1978 8 7 68 71 103 87 55 3392
8/8/1978 1978 8 8 69 68 102 85 53 3445
8/9/1978 1978 8 9 70 74 101 87.5 55.5 3500.5
8/10/1978 1978 8 10 71 80 107 93.5 61.5 3562
8/11/1978 1978 8 11 72 76 102 89 57 3619
8/12/1978 1978 8 12 73 73 98 85.5 53.5 3672.5
8/13/1978 1978 8 13 74 72 92 82 50 3722.5
8/14/1978 1978 8 14 75 63 82 72.5 40.5 3763
8/15/1978 1978 8 15 76 56 85 70.5 38.5 3801.5
8/16/1978 1978 8 16 77 50 95 72.5 40.5 3842
8/17/1978 1978 8 17 78 79 94 86.5 54.5 3896.5
8/18/1978 1978 8 18 79 59 80 69.5 37.5 3934
8/19/1978 1978 8 19 80 56 92 74 42 3976
8/20/1978 1978 8 20 81 70 92 81 49 4025
8/21/1978 1978 8 21 82 66 98 82 50 4075
8/22/1978 1978 8 22 83 78 93 85.5 53.5 4128.5
8/23/1978 1978 8 23 84 72 95 83.5 51.5 4180
8/24/1978 1978 8 24 85 75 82 78.5 46.5 4226.5
8/25/1978 1978 8 25 86 67 97 82 50 4276.5
8/26/1978 1978 8 26 87 50 73 61.5 29.5 4306
8/27/1978 1978 8 27 88 50 95 72.5 40.5 4346.5
8/28/1978 1978 8 28 89 50 76 63 31 4377.5
8/29/1978 1978 8 29 90 65 92 78.5 46.5 4424
8/30/1978 1978 8 30 91 52 97 74.5 42.5 4466.5
8/31/1978 1978 8 31 92 60 95 77.5 45.5 4512
9/1/1978 1978 9 1 93 55 99 77 45 4557
9/2/1978 1978 9 2 94 63 80 71.5 39.5 4596.5
9/3/1978 1978 9 3 95 69 97 83 51 4647.5
9/4/1978 1978 9 4 96 72 100 86 54 4701.5
9/5/1978 1978 9 5 97 68 103 85.5 53.5 4755
9/6/1978 1978 9 6 98 75 95 85 53 4808
9/7/1978 1978 9 7 99 65 95 80 48 4856
9/8/1978 1978 9 8 100 62 93 77.5 45.5 4901.5
9/9/1978 1978 9 9 101 63 92 77.5 45.5 4947
9/10/1978 1978 9 10 102 68 90 79 47 4994
9/11/1978 1978 9 11 103 58 72 65 33 5027
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
9/12/1978 1978 9 12 104 40 73 56.5 24.5 5051.5
9/13/1978 1978 9 13 105 38 80 59 27 5078.5
9/14/1978 1978 9 14 106 48 77 62.5 30.5 5109
9/15/1978 1978 9 15 107 55 77 66 34 5143
9/16/1978 1978 9 16 108 54 82 68 36 5179
9/17/1978 1978 9 17 109 59 84 71.5 39.5 5218.5
9/18/1978 1978 9 18 110 48 62 55 23 5241.5
9/19/1978 1978 9 19 111 37 62 49.5 17.5 5259
9/20/1978 1978 9 20 112 30 62 46 14 5273
9/21/1978 1978 9 21 113 40 67 53.5 21.5 5294.5
9/22/1978 1978 9 22 114 44 78 61 29 5323.5
9/23/1978 1978 9 23 115 56 83 69.5 37.5 5361
9/24/1978 1978 9 24 116 48 86 67 35 5396
9/25/1978 1978 9 25 117 54 85 69.5 37.5 5433.5
9/26/1978 1978 9 26 118 52 85 68.5 36.5 5470
9/27/1978 1978 9 27 119 48 87 67.5 35.5 5505.5
9/28/1978 1978 9 28 120 48 92 70 38 5543.5
9/29/1978 1978 9 29 121 48 60 54 22 5565.5
9/30/1978 1978 9 30 122 42 89 65.5 33.5 5599
10/1/1978 1978 10 1 123 42 95 68.5 36.5 5635.5
10/2/1978 1978 10 2 124 55 80 67.5 35.5 5671
10/3/1978 1978 10 3 125 40 80 60 28 5699
10/4/1978 1978 10 4 126 34 85 59.5 27.5 5726.5
10/5/1978 1978 10 5 127 35 82 58.5 26.5 5753
10/6/1978 1978 10 6 128 35 83 59 27 5780
10/7/1978 1978 10 7 129 43 83 63 31 5811
10/8/1978 1978 10 8 130 40 86 63 31 5842
10/9/1978 1978 10 9 131 42 85 63.5 31.5 5873.5
10/10/1978 1978 10 10 132 44 87 65.5 33.5 5907
10/11/1978 1978 10 11 133 60 85 72.5 40.5 5947.5
10/12/1978 1978 10 12 134 44 79 61.5 29.5 5977
10/13/1978 1978 10 13 135 40 75 57.5 25.5 6002.5
10/14/1978 1978 10 14 136 45 80 62.5 30.5 6033
10/15/1978 1978 10 15 137 38 75 56.5 24.5 6057.5
10/16/1978 1978 10 16 138 35 80 57.5 25.5 6083
10/17/1978 1978 10 17 139 45 86 65.5 33.5 6116.5
10/18/1978 1978 10 18 140 48 75 61.5 29.5 6146
10/19/1978 1978 10 19 141 43 75 59 27 6173
10/20/1978 1978 10 20 142 34 62 48 16 6189
10/21/1978 1978 10 21 143 50 60 55 23 6212
10/22/1978 1978 10 22 144 40 62 51 19 6231
10/23/1978 1978 10 23 145 37 62 49.5 17.5 6248.5
10/24/1978 1978 10 24 146 43 60 51.5 19.5 6268
10/25/1978 1978 10 25 147 40 65 52.5 20.5 6288.5
10/26/1978 1978 10 26 148 24 65 44.5 12.5 6301
10/27/1978 1978 10 27 149 24 67 45.5 13.5 6314.5
10/28/1978 1978 10 28 150 23 65 44 12 6326.5
10/29/1978 1978 10 29 151 25 75 50 18 6344.5
10/30/1978 1978 10 30 152 40 57 48.5 16.5 6361
10/31/1978 1978 10 31 153 32 67 49.5 17.5 6378.5
11/1/1978 1978 11 1 154 37 65 51 19 6397.5
11/2/1978 1978 11 2 155 42 55 48.5 16.5 6414
11/3/1978 1978 11 3 156 38 68 53 21 6435
11/4/1978 1978 11 4 157 34 67 50.5 18.5 6453.5
11/5/1978 1978 11 5 158 40 68 54 22 6475.5
11/6/1978 1978 11 6 159 37 52 44.5 12.5 6488
11/7/1978 1978 11 7 160 32 65 48.5 16.5 6504.5
11/8/1978 1978 11 8 161 30 64 47 15 6519.5
11/9/1978 1978 11 9 162 25 66 45.5 13.5 6533
11/10/1978 1978 11 10 163 55 62 58.5 26.5 6559.5
11/11/1978 1978 11 11 164 45 50 47.5 15.5 6575
11/12/1978 1978 11 12 165 38 42 40 8 6583
11/13/1978 1978 11 13 166 34 39 36.5 4.5 6587.5
11/14/1978 1978 11 14 167 32 39 35.5 3.5 6591
11/15/1978 1978 11 15 168 30 50 40 8 6599
11/16/1978 1978 11 16 169 23 47 35 3 6602
11/17/1978 1978 11 17 170 27 47 37 5 6607
11/18/1978 1978 11 18 171 22 50 36 4 6611
11/19/1978 1978 11 19 172 23 50 36.5 4.5 6615.5
11/20/1978 1978 11 20 173 23 52 37.5 5.5 6621
11/21/1978 1978 11 21 174 25 50 37.5 5.5 6626.5
11/22/1978 1978 11 22 175 40 55 47.5 15.5 6642
11/23/1978 1978 11 23 176 22 52 37 5 6647
11/24/1978 1978 11 24 177 35 42 38.5 6.5 6653.5
11/25/1978 1978 11 25 178 32 46 39 7 6660.5
11/26/1978 1978 11 26 179 28 46 37 5 6665.5
11/27/1978 1978 11 27 180 27 43 35 3 6668.5
11/28/1978 1978 11 28 181 24 37 30.5 -1.5 6667
11/29/1978 1978 11 29 182 24 45 34.5 2.5 6669.5
11/30/1978 1978 11 30 183 25 50 37.5 5.5 6675
12/1/1978 1978 12 1 184 30 50 40 8 6683
12/2/1978 1978 12 2 185 26 40 33 1 6684
12/3/1978 1978 12 3 186 18 37 27.5 -4.5 6679.5
12/4/1978 1978 12 4 187 23 41 32 0 6679.5
12/5/1978 1978 12 5 188 25 34 29.5 -2.5 6677
12/6/1978 1978 12 6 189 4 30 17 -15 6662
12/7/1978 1978 12 7 190 -3 26 11.5 -20.5 6641.5
12/8/1978 1978 12 8 191 -20 22 1 -31 6610.5
12/9/1978 1978 12 9 192 -2 25 11.5 -20.5 6590
12/10/1978 1978 12 10 193 -10 28 9 -23 6567
12/11/1978 1978 12 11 194 -9 25 8 -24 6543
12/12/1978 1978 12 12 195 -5 29 12 -20 6523
12/13/1978 1978 12 13 196 -1 35 17 -15 6508
12/14/1978 1978 12 14 197 -6 27 10.5 -21.5 6486.5
12/15/1978 1978 12 15 198 -6 31 12.5 -19.5 6467
12/16/1978 1978 12 16 199 8 23 15.5 -16.5 6450.5
12/17/1978 1978 12 17 200 16 33 24.5 -7.5 6443
12/18/1978 1978 12 18 201 21 33 27 -5 6438
12/19/1978 1978 12 19 202 16 41 28.5 -3.5 6434.5
12/20/1978 1978 12 20 203 5 35 20 -12 6422.5
12/21/1978 1978 12 21 204 0 27 13.5 -18.5 6404
12/22/1978 1978 12 22 205 -5 29 12 -20 6384
12/23/1978 1978 12 23 206 0 26 13 -19 6365
12/24/1978 1978 12 24 207 5 30 17.5 -14.5 6350.5
12/25/1978 1978 12 25 208 2 30 16 -16 6334.5
12/26/1978 1978 12 26 209 0 24 12 -20 6314.5
12/27/1978 1978 12 27 210 12 25 18.5 -13.5 6301
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
12/28/1978 1978 12 28 211 18 34 26 -6 6295
12/29/1978 1978 12 29 212 8 39 23.5 -8.5 6286.5
12/30/1978 1978 12 30 213 3 18 10.5 -21.5 6265
12/31/1978 1978 12 31 214 -10 28 9 -23 6242
1/1/1979 1979 1 1 215 -10 23 6.5 -25.5 6216.5
1/2/1979 1979 1 2 216 -18 20 1 -31 6185.5
1/3/1979 1979 1 3 217 10 20 15 -17 6168.5
1/4/1979 1979 1 4 218 7 30 18.5 -13.5 6155
1/5/1979 1979 1 5 219 10 25 17.5 -14.5 6140.5
1/6/1979 1979 1 6 220 10 31 20.5 -11.5 6129
1/7/1979 1979 1 7 221 -3 27 12 -20 6109
1/8/1979 1979 1 8 222 -3 25 11 -21 6088
1/9/1979 1979 1 9 223 12 24 18 -14 6074
1/10/1979 1979 1 10 224 0 26 13 -19 6055
1/11/1979 1979 1 11 225 15 29 22 -10 6045
1/12/1979 1979 1 12 226 20 37 28.5 -3.5 6041.5
1/13/1979 1979 1 13 227 4 42 23 -9 6032.5
1/14/1979 1979 1 14 228 8 23 15.5 -16.5 6016
1/15/1979 1979 1 15 229 2 35 18.5 -13.5 6002.5
1/16/1979 1979 1 16 230 16 45 30.5 -1.5 6001
1/17/1979 1979 1 17 231 30 44 37 5 6006
1/18/1979 1979 1 18 232 31 42 36.5 4.5 6010.5
1/19/1979 1979 1 19 233 25 35 30 -2 6008.5
1/20/1979 1979 1 20 234 0 38 19 -13 5995.5
1/21/1979 1979 1 21 235 1 32 16.5 -15.5 5980
1/22/1979 1979 1 22 236 11 25 18 -14 5966
1/23/1979 1979 1 23 237 -9 30 10.5 -21.5 5944.5
1/24/1979 1979 1 24 238 -1 20 9.5 -22.5 5922
1/25/1979 1979 1 25 239 12 30 21 -11 5911
1/26/1979 1979 1 26 240 19 41 30 -2 5909
1/27/1979 1979 1 27 241 -17 24 3.5 -28.5 5880.5
1/28/1979 1979 1 28 242 2 25 13.5 -18.5 5862
1/29/1979 1979 1 29 243 0 25 12.5 -19.5 5842.5
1/30/1979 1979 1 30 244 -25 7 -9 -41 5801.5
1/31/1979 1979 1 31 245 -11 19 4 -28 5773.5
2/1/1979 1979 2 1 246 -10 18 4 -28 5745.5
2/2/1979 1979 2 2 247 -5 20 7.5 -24.5 5721
2/3/1979 1979 2 3 248 -11 21 5 -27 5694
2/4/1979 1979 2 4 249 -8 23 7.5 -24.5 5669.5
2/5/1979 1979 2 5 250 -8 20 6 -26 5643.5
2/6/1979 1979 2 6 251 -10 22 6 -26 5617.5
2/7/1979 1979 2 7 252 -12 27 7.5 -24.5 5593
2/8/1979 1979 2 8 253 -8 30 11 -21 5572
2/9/1979 1979 2 9 254 -3 28 12.5 -19.5 5552.5
2/10/1979 1979 2 10 255 8 8 8 -24 5528.5
2/11/1979 1979 2 11 256 20 36 28 -4 5524.5
2/12/1979 1979 2 12 257 10 37 23.5 -8.5 5516
2/13/1979 1979 2 13 258 12 36 24 -8 5508
2/14/1979 1979 2 14 259 17 53 35 3 5511
2/15/1979 1979 2 15 260 18 45 31.5 -0.5 5510.5
2/16/1979 1979 2 16 261 10 44 27 -5 5505.5
2/17/1979 1979 2 17 262 30 30 30 -2 5503.5
2/18/1979 1979 2 18 263 33 35 34 2 5505.5
2/19/1979 1979 2 19 264 29 34 31.5 -0.5 5505
2/20/1979 1979 2 20 265 25 35 30 -2 5503
2/21/1979 1979 2 21 266 34 40 37 5 5508
2/22/1979 1979 2 22 267 28 48 38 6 5514
2/23/1979 1979 2 23 268 28 42 35 3 5517
2/24/1979 1979 2 24 269 14 44 29 -3 5514
2/25/1979 1979 2 25 270 18 36 27 -5 5509
2/26/1979 1979 2 26 271 25 37 31 -1 5508
2/27/1979 1979 2 27 272 22 52 37 5 5513
2/28/1979 1979 2 28 273 22 44 33 1 5514
3/1/1979 1979 3 1 274 28 45 36.5 4.5 5518.5
3/2/1979 1979 3 2 275 32 50 41 9 5527.5
3/3/1979 1979 3 3 276 22 45 33.5 1.5 5529
3/4/1979 1979 3 4 277 22 45 33.5 1.5 5530.5
3/5/1979 1979 3 5 278 22 48 35 3 5533.5
3/6/1979 1979 3 6 279 25 58 41.5 9.5 5543
3/7/1979 1979 3 7 280 28 55 41.5 9.5 5552.5
3/8/1979 1979 3 8 281 28 60 44 12 5564.5
3/9/1979 1979 3 9 282 20 44 32 0 5564.5
3/10/1979 1979 3 10 283 22 51 36.5 4.5 5569
3/11/1979 1979 3 11 284 25 55 40 8 5577
3/12/1979 1979 3 12 285 23 60 41.5 9.5 5586.5
3/13/1979 1979 3 13 286 35 62 48.5 16.5 5603
3/14/1979 1979 3 14 287 36 56 46 14 5617
3/15/1979 1979 3 15 288 33 57 45 13 5630
3/16/1979 1979 3 16 289 35 40 37.5 5.5 5635.5
3/17/1979 1979 3 17 290 52 55 53.5 21.5 5657
3/18/1979 1979 3 18 291 27 55 41 9 5666
3/19/1979 1979 3 19 292 28 48 38 6 5672
3/20/1979 1979 3 20 293 38 53 45.5 13.5 5685.5
3/21/1979 1979 3 21 294 42 53 47.5 15.5 5701
3/22/1979 1979 3 22 295 37 55 46 14 5715
3/23/1979 1979 3 23 296 34 58 46 14 5729
3/24/1979 1979 3 24 297 40 62 51 19 5748
3/25/1979 1979 3 25 298 42 68 55 23 5771
3/26/1979 1979 3 26 299 45 67 56 24 5795
3/27/1979 1979 3 27 300 51 60 55.5 23.5 5818.5
3/28/1979 1979 3 28 301 42 61 51.5 19.5 5838
3/29/1979 1979 3 29 302 35 51 43 11 5849
3/30/1979 1979 3 30 303 35 55 45 13 5862
3/31/1979 1979 3 31 304 36 50 43 11 5873
4/1/1979 1979 4 1 305 34 47 40.5 8.5 5881.5
4/2/1979 1979 4 2 306 36 49 42.5 10.5 5892
4/3/1979 1979 4 3 307 28 51 39.5 7.5 5899.5
4/4/1979 1979 4 4 308 30 61 45.5 13.5 5913
4/5/1979 1979 4 5 309 33 66 49.5 17.5 5930.5
4/6/1979 1979 4 6 310 40 75 57.5 25.5 5956
4/7/1979 1979 4 7 311 50 76 63 31 5987
4/8/1979 1979 4 8 312 45 74 59.5 27.5 6014.5
4/9/1979 1979 4 9 313 39 66 52.5 20.5 6035
4/10/1979 1979 4 10 314 39 47 43 11 6046
4/11/1979 1979 4 11 315 35 53 44 12 6058
4/12/1979 1979 4 12 316 39 56 47.5 15.5 6073.5
4/13/1979 1979 4 13 317 38 53 45.5 13.5 6087
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
4/14/1979 1979 4 14 318 43 79 61 29 6116
4/15/1979 1979 4 15 319 50 82 66 34 6150
4/16/1979 1979 4 16 320 45 70 57.5 25.5 6175.5
4/17/1979 1979 4 17 321 63 82 72.5 40.5 6216
4/18/1979 1979 4 18 322 58 73 65.5 33.5 6249.5
4/19/1979 1979 4 19 323 43 63 53 21 6270.5
4/20/1979 1979 4 20 324 30 70 50 18 6288.5
4/21/1979 1979 4 21 325 37 76 56.5 24.5 6313
4/22/1979 1979 4 22 326 47 78 62.5 30.5 6343.5
4/23/1979 1979 4 23 327 58 80 69 37 6380.5
4/24/1979 1979 4 24 328 48 75 61.5 29.5 6410
4/25/1979 1979 4 25 329 48 68 58 26 6436
4/26/1979 1979 4 26 330 60 68 64 32 6468
4/27/1979 1979 4 27 331 50 75 62.5 30.5 6498.5
4/28/1979 1979 4 28 332 40 75 57.5 25.5 6524
4/29/1979 1979 4 29 333 52 75 63.5 31.5 6555.5
4/30/1979 1979 4 30 334 31 31 31 -1 6554.5
5/1/1979 1979 5 1 335 42 83 62.5 30.5 6585
5/2/1979 1979 5 2 336 50 62 56 24 6609
5/3/1979 1979 5 3 337 53 68 60.5 28.5 6637.5
5/4/1979 1979 5 4 338 44 70 57 25 6662.5
5/5/1979 1979 5 5 339 54 83 68.5 36.5 6699
5/6/1979 1979 5 6 340 54 84 69 37 6736
5/7/1979 1979 5 7 341 39 56 47.5 15.5 6751.5
5/8/1979 1979 5 8 342 34 54 44 12 6763.5
5/9/1979 1979 5 9 343 36 44 40 8 6771.5
5/10/1979 1979 5 10 344 40 54 47 15 6786.5
5/11/1979 1979 5 11 345 45 62 53.5 21.5 6808
5/12/1979 1979 5 12 346 50 70 60 28 6836
5/13/1979 1979 5 13 347 52 83 67.5 35.5 6871.5
5/14/1979 1979 5 14 348 57 68 62.5 30.5 6902
5/15/1979 1979 5 15 349 58 89 73.5 41.5 6943.5
5/16/1979 1979 5 16 350 65 87 76 44 6987.5
5/17/1979 1979 5 17 351 61 84 72.5 40.5 7028
5/18/1979 1979 5 18 352 63 85 74 42 7070
5/19/1979 1979 5 19 353 60 86 73 41 7111
5/20/1979 1979 5 20 354 65 87 76 44 7155
5/21/1979 1979 5 21 355 68 90 79 47 7202
5/22/1979 1979 5 22 356 60 95 77.5 45.5 7247.5
5/23/1979 1979 5 23 357 66 89 77.5 45.5 7293
5/24/1979 1979 5 24 358 53 75 64 32 7325
5/25/1979 1979 5 25 359 53 76 64.5 32.5 7357.5
5/26/1979 1979 5 26 360 65 75 70 38 7395.5
5/27/1979 1979 5 27 361 68 83 75.5 43.5 7439
5/28/1979 1979 5 28 362 65 74 69.5 37.5 7476.5
5/29/1979 1979 5 29 363 60 73 66.5 34.5 7511
5/30/1979 1979 5 30 364 60 70 65 33 7544
5/31/1979 1979 5 31 365 60 72 66 34 7578
6/1/1979 1979 6 1 1 53 77 65 33 33
6/2/1979 1979 6 2 2 41 83 62 30 63
6/3/1979 1979 6 3 3 50 85 67.5 35.5 98.5
6/4/1979 1979 6 4 4 65 92 78.5 46.5 145
6/5/1979 1979 6 5 5 68 93 80.5 48.5 193.5
6/6/1979 1979 6 6 6 53 95 74 42 235.5
6/7/1979 1979 6 7 7 60 75 67.5 35.5 271
6/8/1979 1979 6 8 8 53 67 60 28 299
6/9/1979 1979 6 9 9 38 75 56.5 24.5 323.5
6/10/1979 1979 6 10 10 60 82 71 39 362.5
6/11/1979 1979 6 11 11 42 92 67 35 397.5
6/12/1979 1979 6 12 12 48 98 73 41 438.5
6/13/1979 1979 6 13 13 72 103 87.5 55.5 494
6/14/1979 1979 6 14 14 65 99 82 50 544
6/15/1979 1979 6 15 15 65 95 80 48 592
6/16/1979 1979 6 16 16 45 64 54.5 22.5 614.5
6/17/1979 1979 6 17 17 70 92 81 49 663.5
6/18/1979 1979 6 18 18 55 77 66 34 697.5
6/19/1979 1979 6 19 19 59 77 68 36 733.5
6/20/1979 1979 6 20 20 65 90 77.5 45.5 779
6/21/1979 1979 6 21 21 45 95 70 38 817
6/22/1979 1979 6 22 22 68 95 81.5 49.5 866.5
6/23/1979 1979 6 23 23 65 95 80 48 914.5
6/24/1979 1979 6 24 24 68 100 84 52 966.5
6/25/1979 1979 6 25 25 68 103 85.5 53.5 1020
6/26/1979 1979 6 26 26 56 101 78.5 46.5 1066.5
6/27/1979 1979 6 27 27 68 103 85.5 53.5 1120
6/28/1979 1979 6 28 28 72 103 87.5 55.5 1175.5
6/29/1979 1979 6 29 29 72 100 86 54 1229.5
6/30/1979 1979 6 30 30 78 103 90.5 58.5 1288
7/1/1979 1979 7 1 31 76 93 84.5 52.5 1340.5
7/2/1979 1979 7 2 32 70 91 80.5 48.5 1389
7/3/1979 1979 7 3 33 65 93 79 47 1436
7/4/1979 1979 7 4 34 65 80 72.5 40.5 1476.5
7/5/1979 1979 7 5 35 67 95 81 49 1525.5
7/6/1979 1979 7 6 36 69 98 83.5 51.5 1577
7/7/1979 1979 7 7 37 72 99 85.5 53.5 1630.5
7/8/1979 1979 7 8 38 65 100 82.5 50.5 1681
7/9/1979 1979 7 9 39 65 100 82.5 50.5 1731.5
7/10/1979 1979 7 10 40 66 106 86 54 1785.5
7/11/1979 1979 7 11 41 59 100 79.5 47.5 1833
7/12/1979 1979 7 12 42 72 94 83 51 1884
7/14/1979 1979 7 14 44 87 90 88.5 56.5 1940.5
7/15/1979 1979 7 15 45 80 102 91 59 1999.5
7/16/1979 1979 7 16 46 80 103 91.5 59.5 2059
7/17/1979 1979 7 17 47 70 100 85 53 2112
7/18/1979 1979 7 18 48 74 90 82 50 2162
7/19/1979 1979 7 19 49 69 96 82.5 50.5 2212.5
7/20/1979 1979 7 20 50 62 92 77 45 2257.5
7/21/1979 1979 7 21 51 77 90 83.5 51.5 2309
7/22/1979 1979 7 22 52 61 100 80.5 48.5 2357.5
7/23/1979 1979 7 23 53 73 97 85 53 2410.5
7/24/1979 1979 7 24 54 60 95 77.5 45.5 2456
7/25/1979 1979 7 25 55 72 95 83.5 51.5 2507.5
7/26/1979 1979 7 26 56 82 107 94.5 62.5 2570
7/27/1979 1979 7 27 57 83 108 95.5 63.5 2633.5
7/28/1979 1979 7 28 58 75 104 89.5 57.5 2691
7/29/1979 1979 7 29 59 72 103 87.5 55.5 2746.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
7/30/1979 1979 7 30 60 70 101 85.5 53.5 2800
7/31/1979 1979 7 31 61 72 100 86 54 2854
8/1/1979 1979 8 1 62 68 100 84 52 2906
8/2/1979 1979 8 2 63 72 100 86 54 2960
8/3/1979 1979 8 3 64 67 103 85 53 3013
8/4/1979 1979 8 4 65 72 105 88.5 56.5 3069.5
8/5/1979 1979 8 5 66 73 109 91 59 3128.5
8/6/1979 1979 8 6 67 77 103 90 58 3186.5
8/7/1979 1979 8 7 68 65 83 74 42 3228.5
8/8/1979 1979 8 8 69 65 96 80.5 48.5 3277
8/9/1979 1979 8 9 70 68 101 84.5 52.5 3329.5
8/10/1979 1979 8 10 71 75 100 87.5 55.5 3385
8/11/1979 1979 8 11 72 71 100 85.5 53.5 3438.5
8/12/1979 1979 8 12 73 69 93 81 49 3487.5
8/13/1979 1979 8 13 74 65 88 76.5 44.5 3532
8/14/1979 1979 8 14 75 66 92 79 47 3579
8/15/1979 1979 8 15 76 60 70 65 33 3612
8/16/1979 1979 8 16 77 54 75 64.5 32.5 3644.5
8/17/1979 1979 8 17 78 51 81 66 34 3678.5
8/18/1979 1979 8 18 79 58 80 69 37 3715.5
8/19/1979 1979 8 19 80 62 80 71 39 3754.5
8/20/1979 1979 8 20 81 48 87 67.5 35.5 3790
8/21/1979 1979 8 21 82 61 67 64 32 3822
8/22/1979 1979 8 22 83 60 93 76.5 44.5 3866.5
8/23/1979 1979 8 23 84 50 94 72 40 3906.5
8/24/1979 1979 8 24 85 53 97 75 43 3949.5
8/25/1979 1979 8 25 86 63 93 78 46 3995.5
8/26/1979 1979 8 26 87 65 95 80 48 4043.5
8/27/1979 1979 8 27 88 60 98 79 47 4090.5
8/28/1979 1979 8 28 89 82 101 91.5 59.5 4150
8/29/1979 1979 8 29 90 63 95 79 47 4197
8/30/1979 1979 8 30 91 72 95 83.5 51.5 4248.5
8/31/1979 1979 8 31 92 72 97 84.5 52.5 4301
9/1/1979 1979 9 1 93 55 96 75.5 43.5 4344.5
9/2/1979 1979 9 2 94 60 98 79 47 4391.5
9/3/1979 1979 9 3 95 63 100 81.5 49.5 4441
9/4/1979 1979 9 4 96 59 97 78 46 4487
9/5/1979 1979 9 5 97 56 99 77.5 45.5 4532.5
9/6/1979 1979 9 6 98 58 100 79 47 4579.5
9/7/1979 1979 9 7 99 62 102 82 50 4629.5
9/8/1979 1979 9 8 100 60 97 78.5 46.5 4676
9/9/1979 1979 9 9 101 62 97 79.5 47.5 4723.5
9/10/1979 1979 9 10 102 68 95 81.5 49.5 4773
9/11/1979 1979 9 11 103 66 100 83 51 4824
9/12/1979 1979 9 12 104 55 87 71 39 4863
9/13/1979 1979 9 13 105 48 80 64 32 4895
9/14/1979 1979 9 14 106 53 76 64.5 32.5 4927.5
9/15/1979 1979 9 15 107 48 83 65.5 33.5 4961
9/16/1979 1979 9 16 108 55 86 70.5 38.5 4999.5
9/17/1979 1979 9 17 109 50 92 71 39 5038.5
9/18/1979 1979 9 18 110 54 90 72 40 5078.5
9/19/1979 1979 9 19 111 65 89 77 45 5123.5
9/20/1979 1979 9 20 112 64 80 72 40 5163.5
9/21/1979 1979 9 21 113 50 85 67.5 35.5 5199
9/22/1979 1979 9 22 114 52 93 72.5 40.5 5239.5
9/23/1979 1979 9 23 115 53 87 70 38 5277.5
9/24/1979 1979 9 24 116 53 93 73 41 5318.5
9/25/1979 1979 9 25 117 55 73 64 32 5350.5
9/26/1979 1979 9 26 118 57 88 72.5 40.5 5391
9/27/1979 1979 9 27 119 51 87 69 37 5428
9/28/1979 1979 9 28 120 50 87 68.5 36.5 5464.5
9/29/1979 1979 9 29 121 53 88 70.5 38.5 5503
9/30/1979 1979 9 30 122 42 90 66 34 5537
10/1/1979 1979 10 1 123 42 90 66 34 5571
10/2/1979 1979 10 2 124 61 88 74.5 42.5 5613.5
10/3/1979 1979 10 3 125 54 88 71 39 5652.5
10/4/1979 1979 10 4 126 50 85 67.5 35.5 5688
10/5/1979 1979 10 5 127 41 89 65 33 5721
10/6/1979 1979 10 6 128 45 87 66 34 5755
10/7/1979 1979 10 7 129 56 88 72 40 5795
10/8/1979 1979 10 8 130 48 85 66.5 34.5 5829.5
10/9/1979 1979 10 9 131 47 83 65 33 5862.5
10/10/1979 1979 10 10 132 43 90 66.5 34.5 5897
10/11/1979 1979 10 11 133 40 80 60 28 5925
10/12/1979 1979 10 12 134 45 82 63.5 31.5 5956.5
10/13/1979 1979 10 13 135 40 76 58 26 5982.5
10/14/1979 1979 10 14 136 48 73 60.5 28.5 6011
10/15/1979 1979 10 15 137 43 73 58 26 6037
10/16/1979 1979 10 16 138 47 74 60.5 28.5 6065.5
10/17/1979 1979 10 17 139 40 68 54 22 6087.5
10/18/1979 1979 10 18 140 44 68 56 24 6111.5
10/19/1979 1979 10 19 141 67 82 74.5 42.5 6154
10/20/1979 1979 10 20 142 45 70 57.5 25.5 6179.5
10/21/1979 1979 10 21 143 30 60 45 13 6192.5
10/22/1979 1979 10 22 144 26 58 42 10 6202.5
10/23/1979 1979 10 23 145 32 64 48 16 6218.5
10/24/1979 1979 10 24 146 30 67 48.5 16.5 6235
10/25/1979 1979 10 25 147 25 72 48.5 16.5 6251.5
10/26/1979 1979 10 26 148 32 77 54.5 22.5 6274
10/27/1979 1979 10 27 149 32 65 48.5 16.5 6290.5
10/28/1979 1979 10 28 150 28 67 47.5 15.5 6306
10/29/1979 1979 10 29 151 39 49 44 12 6318
10/30/1979 1979 10 30 152 35 51 43 11 6329
10/31/1979 1979 10 31 153 14 48 31 -1 6328
11/1/1979 1979 11 1 154 15 50 32.5 0.5 6328.5
11/2/1979 1979 11 2 155 15 52 33.5 1.5 6330
11/3/1979 1979 11 3 156 15 55 35 3 6333
11/4/1979 1979 11 4 157 20 58 39 7 6340
11/5/1979 1979 11 5 158 20 59 39.5 7.5 6347.5
11/6/1979 1979 11 6 159 23 55 39 7 6354.5
11/7/1979 1979 11 7 160 37 52 44.5 12.5 6367
11/8/1979 1979 11 8 161 30 50 40 8 6375
11/9/1979 1979 11 9 162 26 57 41.5 9.5 6384.5
11/10/1979 1979 11 10 163 15 51 33 1 6385.5
11/11/1979 1979 11 11 164 17 55 36 4 6389.5
11/12/1979 1979 11 12 165 12 50 31 -1 6388.5
11/13/1979 1979 11 13 166 11 53 32 0 6388.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
11/14/1979 1979 11 14 167 10 55 32.5 0.5 6389
11/15/1979 1979 11 15 168 9 57 33 1 6390
11/16/1979 1979 11 16 169 9 55 32 0 6390
11/17/1979 1979 11 17 170 23 45 34 2 6392
11/18/1979 1979 11 18 171 25 53 39 7 6399
11/19/1979 1979 11 19 172 28 35 31.5 -0.5 6398.5
11/20/1979 1979 11 20 173 16 36 26 -6 6392.5
11/21/1979 1979 11 21 174 5 38 21.5 -10.5 6382
11/22/1979 1979 11 22 175 -5 34 14.5 -17.5 6364.5
11/23/1979 1979 11 23 176 4 40 22 -10 6354.5
11/24/1979 1979 11 24 177 7 30 18.5 -13.5 6341
11/25/1979 1979 11 25 178 7 31 19 -13 6328
11/26/1979 1979 11 26 179 10 42 26 -6 6322
11/27/1979 1979 11 27 180 8 40 24 -8 6314
11/28/1979 1979 11 28 181 5 32 18.5 -13.5 6300.5
11/29/1979 1979 11 29 182 2 37 19.5 -12.5 6288
11/30/1979 1979 11 30 183 -5 35 15 -17 6271
12/1/1979 1979 12 1 184 -2 40 19 -13 6258
12/2/1979 1979 12 2 185 6 32 19 -13 6245
12/3/1979 1979 12 3 186 10 37 23.5 -8.5 6236.5
12/4/1979 1979 12 4 187 6 38 22 -10 6226.5
12/5/1979 1979 12 5 188 11 40 25.5 -6.5 6220
12/6/1979 1979 12 6 189 16 30 23 -9 6211
12/7/1979 1979 12 7 190 13 29 21 -11 6200
12/8/1979 1979 12 8 191 12 30 21 -11 6189
12/9/1979 1979 12 9 192 12 28 20 -12 6177
12/10/1979 1979 12 10 193 16 37 26.5 -5.5 6171.5
12/11/1979 1979 12 11 194 15 28 21.5 -10.5 6161
12/12/1979 1979 12 12 195 5 22 13.5 -18.5 6142.5
12/13/1979 1979 12 13 196 -1 35 17 -15 6127.5
12/14/1979 1979 12 14 197 3 25 14 -18 6109.5
12/15/1979 1979 12 15 198 5 25 15 -17 6092.5
12/16/1979 1979 12 16 199 5 29 17 -15 6077.5
12/17/1979 1979 12 17 200 7 22 14.5 -17.5 6060
12/18/1979 1979 12 18 201 7 26 16.5 -15.5 6044.5
12/19/1979 1979 12 19 202 8 22 15 -17 6027.5
12/20/1979 1979 12 20 203 12 27 19.5 -12.5 6015
12/21/1979 1979 12 21 204 23 35 29 -3 6012
12/22/1979 1979 12 22 205 21 43 32 0 6012
12/23/1979 1979 12 23 206 5 28 16.5 -15.5 5996.5
12/24/1979 1979 12 24 207 19 31 25 -7 5989.5
12/25/1979 1979 12 25 208 10 28 19 -13 5976.5
12/26/1979 1979 12 26 209 24 35 29.5 -2.5 5974
12/27/1979 1979 12 27 210 5 32 18.5 -13.5 5960.5
12/28/1979 1979 12 28 211 5 27 16 -16 5944.5
12/29/1979 1979 12 29 212 14 27 20.5 -11.5 5933
12/30/1979 1979 12 30 213 20 36 28 -4 5929
12/31/1979 1979 12 31 214 22 35 28.5 -3.5 5925.5
1/1/1980 1980 1 1 215 23 33 28 -4 5921.5
1/2/1980 1980 1 2 216 25 35 30 -2 5919.5
1/3/1980 1980 1 3 217 23 31 27 -5 5914.5
1/4/1980 1980 1 4 218 23 32 27.5 -4.5 5910
1/5/1980 1980 1 5 219 23 32 27.5 -4.5 5905.5
1/6/1980 1980 1 6 220 13 33 23 -9 5896.5
1/7/1980 1980 1 7 221 19 31 25 -7 5889.5
1/8/1980 1980 1 8 222 15 37 26 -6 5883.5
1/9/1980 1980 1 9 223 27 42 34.5 2.5 5886
1/10/1980 1980 1 10 224 30 50 40 8 5894
1/11/1980 1980 1 11 225 27 30 28.5 -3.5 5890.5
1/12/1980 1980 1 12 226 29 37 33 1 5891.5
1/13/1980 1980 1 13 227 27 54 40.5 8.5 5900
1/14/1980 1980 1 14 228 35 49 42 10 5910
1/15/1980 1980 1 15 229 32 40 36 4 5914
1/16/1980 1980 1 16 230 37 45 41 9 5923
1/17/1980 1980 1 17 231 37 50 43.5 11.5 5934.5
1/18/1980 1980 1 18 232 39 45 42 10 5944.5
1/19/1980 1980 1 19 233 34 39 36.5 4.5 5949
1/20/1980 1980 1 20 234 28 41 34.5 2.5 5951.5
1/21/1980 1980 1 21 235 27 39 33 1 5952.5
1/22/1980 1980 1 22 236 20 44 32 0 5952.5
1/23/1980 1980 1 23 237 18 39 28.5 -3.5 5949
1/24/1980 1980 1 24 238 20 43 31.5 -0.5 5948.5
1/25/1980 1980 1 25 239 22 47 34.5 2.5 5951
1/26/1980 1980 1 26 240 22 58 40 8 5959
1/27/1980 1980 1 27 241 33 55 44 12 5971
1/28/1980 1980 1 28 242 33 45 39 7 5978
1/29/1980 1980 1 29 243 34 53 43.5 11.5 5989.5
1/30/1980 1980 1 30 244 23 42 32.5 0.5 5990
1/31/1980 1980 1 31 245 15 41 28 -4 5986
2/1/1980 1980 2 1 246 18 47 32.5 0.5 5986.5
2/2/1980 1980 2 2 247 22 53 37.5 5.5 5992
2/3/1980 1980 2 3 248 22 44 33 1 5993
2/4/1980 1980 2 4 249 24 55 39.5 7.5 6000.5
2/5/1980 1980 2 5 250 19 52 35.5 3.5 6004
2/6/1980 1980 2 6 251 25 49 37 5 6009
2/7/1980 1980 2 7 252 35 40 37.5 5.5 6014.5
2/8/1980 1980 2 8 253 20 40 30 -2 6012.5
2/9/1980 1980 2 9 254 19 44 31.5 -0.5 6012
2/10/1980 1980 2 10 255 10 45 27.5 -4.5 6007.5
2/11/1980 1980 2 11 256 14 49 31.5 -0.5 6007
2/12/1980 1980 2 12 257 14 52 33 1 6008
2/13/1980 1980 2 13 258 17 57 37 5 6013
2/14/1980 1980 2 14 259 40 52 46 14 6027
2/15/1980 1980 2 15 260 35 62 48.5 16.5 6043.5
2/16/1980 1980 2 16 261 34 55 44.5 12.5 6056
2/17/1980 1980 2 17 262 41 57 49 17 6073
2/18/1980 1980 2 18 263 50 65 57.5 25.5 6098.5
2/19/1980 1980 2 19 264 33 63 48 16 6114.5
2/20/1980 1980 2 20 265 38 51 44.5 12.5 6127
2/21/1980 1980 2 21 266 33 52 42.5 10.5 6137.5
2/22/1980 1980 2 22 267 30 55 42.5 10.5 6148
2/23/1980 1980 2 23 268 35 51 43 11 6159
2/24/1980 1980 2 24 269 20 52 36 4 6163
2/25/1980 1980 2 25 270 20 53 36.5 4.5 6167.5
2/26/1980 1980 2 26 271 19 58 38.5 6.5 6174
2/27/1980 1980 2 27 272 21 58 39.5 7.5 6181.5
2/28/1980 1980 2 28 273 24 60 42 10 6191.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
2/29/1980 1980 2 29 274 34 60 47 15 6206.5
3/1/1980 1980 3 1 275 29 55 42 10 6216.5
3/2/1980 1980 3 2 276 36 60 48 16 6232.5
3/3/1980 1980 3 3 277 35 58 46.5 14.5 6247
3/4/1980 1980 3 4 278 35 56 45.5 13.5 6260.5
3/5/1980 1980 3 5 279 25 57 41 9 6269.5
3/6/1980 1980 3 6 280 39 48 43.5 11.5 6281
3/7/1980 1980 3 7 281 35 55 45 13 6294
3/8/1980 1980 3 8 282 25 55 40 8 6302
3/9/1980 1980 3 9 283 26 55 40.5 8.5 6310.5
3/10/1980 1980 3 10 284 23 58 40.5 8.5 6319
3/11/1980 1980 3 11 285 39 50 44.5 12.5 6331.5
3/12/1980 1980 3 12 286 30 47 38.5 6.5 6338
3/13/1980 1980 3 13 287 20 57 38.5 6.5 6344.5
3/14/1980 1980 3 14 288 27 67 47 15 6359.5
3/15/1980 1980 3 15 289 35 66 50.5 18.5 6378
3/16/1980 1980 3 16 290 35 44 39.5 7.5 6385.5
3/17/1980 1980 3 17 291 15 47 31 -1 6384.5
3/18/1980 1980 3 18 292 18 57 37.5 5.5 6390
3/19/1980 1980 3 19 293 28 59 43.5 11.5 6401.5
3/20/1980 1980 3 20 294 53 63 58 26 6427.5
3/21/1980 1980 3 21 295 39 64 51.5 19.5 6447
3/22/1980 1980 3 22 296 32 46 39 7 6454
3/23/1980 1980 3 23 297 28 45 36.5 4.5 6458.5
3/24/1980 1980 3 24 298 24 53 38.5 6.5 6465
3/25/1980 1980 3 25 299 31 48 39.5 7.5 6472.5
3/26/1980 1980 3 26 300 29 48 38.5 6.5 6479
3/27/1980 1980 3 27 301 28 42 35 3 6482
3/28/1980 1980 3 28 302 30 50 40 8 6490
3/29/1980 1980 3 29 303 28 57 42.5 10.5 6500.5
3/30/1980 1980 3 30 304 28 53 40.5 8.5 6509
3/31/1980 1980 3 31 305 25 45 35 3 6512
4/1/1980 1980 4 1 306 21 43 32 0 6512
4/2/1980 1980 4 2 307 37 55 46 14 6526
4/3/1980 1980 4 3 308 35 58 46.5 14.5 6540.5
4/4/1980 1980 4 4 309 32 64 48 16 6556.5
4/5/1980 1980 4 5 310 41 70 55.5 23.5 6580
4/6/1980 1980 4 6 311 35 68 51.5 19.5 6599.5
4/7/1980 1980 4 7 312 40 51 45.5 13.5 6613
4/8/1980 1980 4 8 313 35 60 47.5 15.5 6628.5
4/9/1980 1980 4 9 314 29 70 49.5 17.5 6646
4/10/1980 1980 4 10 315 51 70 60.5 28.5 6674.5
4/11/1980 1980 4 11 316 40 52 46 14 6688.5
4/12/1980 1980 4 12 317 40 55 47.5 15.5 6704
4/13/1980 1980 4 13 318 32 62 47 15 6719
4/14/1980 1980 4 14 319 25 72 48.5 16.5 6735.5
4/15/1980 1980 4 15 320 43 79 61 29 6764.5
4/16/1980 1980 4 16 321 40 75 57.5 25.5 6790
4/17/1980 1980 4 17 322 31 80 55.5 23.5 6813.5
4/18/1980 1980 4 18 323 43 79 61 29 6842.5
4/19/1980 1980 4 19 324 50 86 68 36 6878.5
4/20/1980 1980 4 20 325 50 87 68.5 36.5 6915
4/21/1980 1980 4 21 326 55 72 63.5 31.5 6946.5
4/22/1980 1980 4 22 327 49 72 60.5 28.5 6975
4/23/1980 1980 4 23 328 45 62 53.5 21.5 6996.5
4/24/1980 1980 4 24 329 48 70 59 27 7023.5
4/25/1980 1980 4 25 330 48 72 60 28 7051.5
4/26/1980 1980 4 26 331 49 77 63 31 7082.5
4/27/1980 1980 4 27 332 42 73 57.5 25.5 7108
4/28/1980 1980 4 28 333 54 79 66.5 34.5 7142.5
4/29/1980 1980 4 29 334 50 63 56.5 24.5 7167
4/30/1980 1980 4 30 335 48 65 56.5 24.5 7191.5
5/1/1980 1980 5 1 336 48 63 55.5 23.5 7215
5/2/1980 1980 5 2 337 50 64 57 25 7240
5/3/1980 1980 5 3 338 42 77 59.5 27.5 7267.5
5/4/1980 1980 5 4 339 63 82 72.5 40.5 7308
5/5/1980 1980 5 5 340 58 83 70.5 38.5 7346.5
5/6/1980 1980 5 6 341 55 73 64 32 7378.5
5/7/1980 1980 5 7 342 52 70 61 29 7407.5
5/8/1980 1980 5 8 343 42 73 57.5 25.5 7433
5/9/1980 1980 5 9 344 56 72 64 32 7465
5/10/1980 1980 5 10 345 55 70 62.5 30.5 7495.5
5/11/1980 1980 5 11 346 48 63 55.5 23.5 7519
5/12/1980 1980 5 12 347 48 62 55 23 7542
5/13/1980 1980 5 13 348 49 68 58.5 26.5 7568.5
5/14/1980 1980 5 14 349 44 58 51 19 7587.5
5/15/1980 1980 5 15 350 52 65 58.5 26.5 7614
5/16/1980 1980 5 16 351 40 82 61 29 7643
5/17/1980 1980 5 17 352 52 65 58.5 26.5 7669.5
5/18/1980 1980 5 18 353 52 72 62 30 7699.5
5/19/1980 1980 5 19 354 57 84 70.5 38.5 7738
5/20/1980 1980 5 20 355 64 85 74.5 42.5 7780.5
5/21/1980 1980 5 21 356 45 90 67.5 35.5 7816
5/22/1980 1980 5 22 357 65 85 75 43 7859
5/23/1980 1980 5 23 358 65 78 71.5 39.5 7898.5
5/24/1980 1980 5 24 359 47 63 55 23 7921.5
5/25/1980 1980 5 25 360 40 58 49 17 7938.5
5/26/1980 1980 5 26 361 47 72 59.5 27.5 7966
5/27/1980 1980 5 27 362 39 80 59.5 27.5 7993.5
5/28/1980 1980 5 28 363 62 80 71 39 8032.5
5/29/1980 1980 5 29 364 55 74 64.5 32.5 8065
5/30/1980 1980 5 30 365 60 82 71 39 8104
5/31/1980 1980 5 31 366 57 80 68.5 36.5 8140.5
6/1/1980 1980 6 1 1 50 62 56 24 24
6/2/1980 1980 6 2 2 55 80 67.5 35.5 59.5
6/3/1980 1980 6 3 3 72 87 79.5 47.5 107
6/4/1980 1980 6 4 4 65 86 75.5 43.5 150.5
6/5/1980 1980 6 5 5 70 88 79 47 197.5
6/6/1980 1980 6 6 6 71 85 78 46 243.5
6/7/1980 1980 6 7 7 60 82 71 39 282.5
6/8/1980 1980 6 8 8 63 93 78 46 328.5
6/9/1980 1980 6 9 9 45 93 69 37 365.5
6/10/1980 1980 6 10 10 70 98 84 52 417.5
6/11/1980 1980 6 11 11 60 95 77.5 45.5 463
6/12/1980 1980 6 12 12 57 93 75 43 506
6/13/1980 1980 6 13 13 69 92 80.5 48.5 554.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
6/14/1980 1980 6 14 14 70 90 80 48 602.5
6/15/1980 1980 6 15 15 62 62 62 30 632.5
6/16/1980 1980 6 16 16 64 85 74.5 42.5 675
6/17/1980 1980 6 17 17 70 95 82.5 50.5 725.5
6/18/1980 1980 6 18 18 69 98 83.5 51.5 777
6/19/1980 1980 6 19 19 74 95 84.5 52.5 829.5
6/20/1980 1980 6 20 20 52 98 75 43 872.5
6/21/1980 1980 6 21 21 68 98 83 51 923.5
6/22/1980 1980 6 22 22 69 98 83.5 51.5 975
6/23/1980 1980 6 23 23 80 95 87.5 55.5 1030.5
6/24/1980 1980 6 24 24 70 95 82.5 50.5 1081
6/25/1980 1980 6 25 25 72 100 86 54 1135
6/26/1980 1980 6 26 26 57 100 78.5 46.5 1181.5
6/27/1980 1980 6 27 27 74 95 84.5 52.5 1234
6/28/1980 1980 6 28 28 72 100 86 54 1288
6/29/1980 1980 6 29 29 74 102 88 56 1344
6/30/1980 1980 6 30 30 74 99 86.5 54.5 1398.5
7/1/1980 1980 7 1 31 70 86 78 46 1444.5
7/2/1980 1980 7 2 32 75 90 82.5 50.5 1495
7/3/1980 1980 7 3 33 58 98 78 46 1541
7/4/1980 1980 7 4 34 72 92 82 50 1591
7/5/1980 1980 7 5 35 72 102 87 55 1646
7/6/1980 1980 7 6 36 70 97 83.5 51.5 1697.5
7/7/1980 1980 7 7 37 63 86 74.5 42.5 1740
7/8/1980 1980 7 8 38 53 95 74 42 1782
7/9/1980 1980 7 9 39 73 100 86.5 54.5 1836.5
7/10/1980 1980 7 10 40 75 101 88 56 1892.5
7/11/1980 1980 7 11 41 63 103 83 51 1943.5
7/12/1980 1980 7 12 42 81 98 89.5 57.5 2001
7/13/1980 1980 7 13 43 72 95 83.5 51.5 2052.5
7/14/1980 1980 7 14 44 74 97 85.5 53.5 2106
7/15/1980 1980 7 15 45 70 99 84.5 52.5 2158.5
7/16/1980 1980 7 16 46 75 105 90 58 2216.5
7/17/1980 1980 7 17 47 70 103 86.5 54.5 2271
7/18/1980 1980 7 18 48 73 107 90 58 2329
7/19/1980 1980 7 19 49 85 103 94 62 2391
7/20/1980 1980 7 20 50 74 102 88 56 2447
7/21/1980 1980 7 21 51 74 104 89 57 2504
7/22/1980 1980 7 22 52 80 104 92 60 2564
7/23/1980 1980 7 23 53 72 105 88.5 56.5 2620.5
7/24/1980 1980 7 24 54 71 102 86.5 54.5 2675
7/25/1980 1980 7 25 55 80 101 90.5 58.5 2733.5
7/26/1980 1980 7 26 56 62 103 82.5 50.5 2784
7/27/1980 1980 7 27 57 70 101 85.5 53.5 2837.5
7/28/1980 1980 7 28 58 77 105 91 59 2896.5
7/29/1980 1980 7 29 59 68 96 82 50 2946.5
7/30/1980 1980 7 30 60 75 98 86.5 54.5 3001
7/31/1980 1980 7 31 61 63 100 81.5 49.5 3050.5
8/1/1980 1980 8 1 62 82 95 88.5 56.5 3107
8/2/1980 1980 8 2 63 76 100 88 56 3163
8/3/1980 1980 8 3 64 55 102 78.5 46.5 3209.5
8/4/1980 1980 8 4 65 72 98 85 53 3262.5
8/5/1980 1980 8 5 66 70 105 87.5 55.5 3318
8/6/1980 1980 8 6 67 76 103 89.5 57.5 3375.5
8/7/1980 1980 8 7 68 76 101 88.5 56.5 3432
8/8/1980 1980 8 8 69 59 105 82 50 3482
8/9/1980 1980 8 9 70 82 105 93.5 61.5 3543.5
8/10/1980 1980 8 10 71 80 103 91.5 59.5 3603
8/11/1980 1980 8 11 72 54 100 77 45 3648
8/12/1980 1980 8 12 73 61 102 81.5 49.5 3697.5
8/13/1980 1980 8 13 74 70 95 82.5 50.5 3748
8/14/1980 1980 8 14 75 70 92 81 49 3797
8/15/1980 1980 8 15 76 66 88 77 45 3842
8/16/1980 1980 8 16 77 60 88 74 42 3884
8/17/1980 1980 8 17 78 62 93 77.5 45.5 3929.5
8/18/1980 1980 8 18 79 63 95 79 47 3976.5
8/19/1980 1980 8 19 80 65 81 73 41 4017.5
8/20/1980 1980 8 20 81 48 84 66 34 4051.5
8/21/1980 1980 8 21 82 42 92 67 35 4086.5
8/22/1980 1980 8 22 83 60 95 77.5 45.5 4132
8/23/1980 1980 8 23 84 64 96 80 48 4180
8/24/1980 1980 8 24 85 62 80 71 39 4219
8/25/1980 1980 8 25 86 62 80 71 39 4258
8/26/1980 1980 8 26 87 57 83 70 38 4296
8/27/1980 1980 8 27 88 61 96 78.5 46.5 4342.5
8/28/1980 1980 8 28 89 77 95 86 54 4396.5
8/29/1980 1980 8 29 90 65 88 76.5 44.5 4441
8/30/1980 1980 8 30 91 67 92 79.5 47.5 4488.5
8/31/1980 1980 8 31 92 52 87 69.5 37.5 4526
9/1/1980 1980 9 1 93 65 88 76.5 44.5 4570.5
9/2/1980 1980 9 2 94 55 95 75 43 4613.5
9/3/1980 1980 9 3 95 60 96 78 46 4659.5
9/4/1980 1980 9 4 96 50 94 72 40 4699.5
9/5/1980 1980 9 5 97 60 94 77 45 4744.5
9/6/1980 1980 9 6 98 72 90 81 49 4793.5
9/7/1980 1980 9 7 99 62 72 67 35 4828.5
9/8/1980 1980 9 8 100 60 78 69 37 4865.5
9/9/1980 1980 9 9 101 54 67 60.5 28.5 4894
9/10/1980 1980 9 10 102 55 60 57.5 25.5 4919.5
9/11/1980 1980 9 11 103 60 80 70 38 4957.5
9/12/1980 1980 9 12 104 51 77 64 32 4989.5
9/13/1980 1980 9 13 105 57 87 72 40 5029.5
9/14/1980 1980 9 14 106 60 86 73 41 5070.5
9/15/1980 1980 9 15 107 53 85 69 37 5107.5
9/16/1980 1980 9 16 108 52 85 68.5 36.5 5144
9/17/1980 1980 9 17 109 54 90 72 40 5184
9/18/1980 1980 9 18 110 55 95 75 43 5227
9/19/1980 1980 9 19 111 65 90 77.5 45.5 5272.5
9/20/1980 1980 9 20 112 55 80 67.5 35.5 5308
9/21/1980 1980 9 21 113 47 80 63.5 31.5 5339.5
9/22/1980 1980 9 22 114 40 82 61 29 5368.5
9/23/1980 1980 9 23 115 47 78 62.5 30.5 5399
9/24/1980 1980 9 24 116 47 80 63.5 31.5 5430.5
9/25/1980 1980 9 25 117 45 80 62.5 30.5 5461
9/26/1980 1980 9 26 118 46 82 64 32 5493
9/27/1980 1980 9 27 119 80 84 82 50 5543
9/28/1980 1980 9 28 120 48 88 68 36 5579
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
9/29/1980 1980 9 29 121 50 87 68.5 36.5 5615.5
9/30/1980 1980 9 30 122 45 87 66 34 5649.5
10/1/1980 1980 10 1 123 52 92 72 40 5689.5
10/2/1980 1980 10 2 124 49 82 65.5 33.5 5723
10/3/1980 1980 10 3 125 45 82 63.5 31.5 5754.5
10/4/1980 1980 10 4 126 50 87 68.5 36.5 5791
10/5/1980 1980 10 5 127 45 65 55 23 5814
10/6/1980 1980 10 6 128 63 88 75.5 43.5 5857.5
10/7/1980 1980 10 7 129 48 85 66.5 34.5 5892
10/8/1980 1980 10 8 130 45 87 66 34 5926
10/9/1980 1980 10 9 131 43 85 64 32 5958
10/10/1980 1980 10 10 132 44 81 62.5 30.5 5988.5
10/11/1980 1980 10 11 133 50 79 64.5 32.5 6021
10/12/1980 1980 10 12 134 55 60 57.5 25.5 6046.5
10/13/1980 1980 10 13 135 49 70 59.5 27.5 6074
10/14/1980 1980 10 14 136 52 72 62 30 6104
10/15/1980 1980 10 15 137 44 45 44.5 12.5 6116.5
10/16/1980 1980 10 16 138 40 50 45 13 6129.5
10/17/1980 1980 10 17 139 38 60 49 17 6146.5
10/18/1980 1980 10 18 140 27 27 27 -5 6141.5
10/19/1980 1980 10 19 141 30 62 46 14 6155.5
10/20/1980 1980 10 20 142 27 63 45 13 6168.5
10/21/1980 1980 10 21 143 35 65 50 18 6186.5
10/22/1980 1980 10 22 144 42 70 56 24 6210.5
10/23/1980 1980 10 23 145 28 55 41.5 9.5 6220
10/24/1980 1980 10 24 146 23 58 40.5 8.5 6228.5
10/25/1980 1980 10 25 147 38 58 48 16 6244.5
10/26/1980 1980 10 26 148 41 52 46.5 14.5 6259
10/27/1980 1980 10 27 149 38 49 43.5 11.5 6270.5
10/28/1980 1980 10 28 150 27 53 40 8 6278.5
10/29/1980 1980 10 29 151 25 53 39 7 6285.5
10/30/1980 1980 10 30 152 22 61 41.5 9.5 6295
10/31/1980 1980 10 31 153 26 60 43 11 6306
11/1/1980 1980 11 1 154 24 61 42.5 10.5 6316.5
11/2/1980 1980 11 2 155 28 65 46.5 14.5 6331
11/3/1980 1980 11 3 156 40 64 52 20 6351
11/4/1980 1980 11 4 157 40 70 55 23 6374
11/5/1980 1980 11 5 158 30 68 49 17 6391
11/6/1980 1980 11 6 159 29 68 48.5 16.5 6407.5
11/7/1980 1980 11 7 160 32 62 47 15 6422.5
11/8/1980 1980 11 8 161 32 80 56 24 6446.5
11/9/1980 1980 11 9 162 40 70 55 23 6469.5
11/10/1980 1980 11 10 163 26 61 43.5 11.5 6481
11/11/1980 1980 11 11 164 32 65 48.5 16.5 6497.5
11/12/1980 1980 11 12 165 40 66 53 21 6518.5
11/13/1980 1980 11 13 166 38 54 46 14 6532.5
11/14/1980 1980 11 14 167 24 45 34.5 2.5 6535
11/15/1980 1980 11 15 168 14 44 29 -3 6532
11/16/1980 1980 11 16 169 14 60 37 5 6537
11/17/1980 1980 11 17 170 9 45 27 -5 6532
11/18/1980 1980 11 18 171 12 42 27 -5 6527
11/19/1980 1980 11 19 172 9 47 28 -4 6523
11/20/1980 1980 11 20 173 15 52 33.5 1.5 6524.5
11/21/1980 1980 11 21 174 9 47 28 -4 6520.5
11/22/1980 1980 11 22 175 26 51 38.5 6.5 6527
11/23/1980 1980 11 23 176 24 48 36 4 6531
11/24/1980 1980 11 24 177 35 43 39 7 6538
11/25/1980 1980 11 25 178 16 44 30 -2 6536
11/26/1980 1980 11 26 179 13 46 29.5 -2.5 6533.5
11/27/1980 1980 11 27 180 13 45 29 -3 6530.5
11/28/1980 1980 11 28 181 15 50 32.5 0.5 6531
11/29/1980 1980 11 29 182 19 38 28.5 -3.5 6527.5
11/30/1980 1980 11 30 183 22 45 33.5 1.5 6529
12/1/1980 1980 12 1 184 22 55 38.5 6.5 6535.5
12/2/1980 1980 12 2 185 15 52 33.5 1.5 6537
12/3/1980 1980 12 3 186 35 61 48 16 6553
12/4/1980 1980 12 4 187 48 63 55.5 23.5 6576.5
12/5/1980 1980 12 5 188 37 55 46 14 6590.5
12/6/1980 1980 12 6 189 35 55 45 13 6603.5
12/7/1980 1980 12 7 190 27 45 36 4 6607.5
12/8/1980 1980 12 8 191 15 44 29.5 -2.5 6605
12/9/1980 1980 12 9 192 15 44 29.5 -2.5 6602.5
12/10/1980 1980 12 10 193 8 45 26.5 -5.5 6597
12/11/1980 1980 12 11 194 10 44 27 -5 6592
12/12/1980 1980 12 12 195 12 44 28 -4 6588
12/13/1980 1980 12 13 196 16 42 29 -3 6585
12/14/1980 1980 12 14 197 9 42 25.5 -6.5 6578.5
12/15/1980 1980 12 15 198 15 28 21.5 -10.5 6568
12/16/1980 1980 12 16 199 18 51 34.5 2.5 6570.5
12/17/1980 1980 12 17 200 15 51 33 1 6571.5
12/18/1980 1980 12 18 201 19 53 36 4 6575.5
12/19/1980 1980 12 19 202 18 53 35.5 3.5 6579
12/20/1980 1980 12 20 203 15 26 20.5 -11.5 6567.5
12/21/1980 1980 12 21 204 18 34 26 -6 6561.5
12/22/1980 1980 12 22 205 28 55 41.5 9.5 6571
12/23/1980 1980 12 23 206 20 59 39.5 7.5 6578.5
12/24/1980 1980 12 24 207 16 49 32.5 0.5 6579
12/25/1980 1980 12 25 208 30 52 41 9 6588
12/26/1980 1980 12 26 209 20 53 36.5 4.5 6592.5
12/27/1980 1980 12 27 210 18 48 33 1 6593.5
12/28/1980 1980 12 28 211 26 55 40.5 8.5 6602
12/29/1980 1980 12 29 212 15 52 33.5 1.5 6603.5
12/30/1980 1980 12 30 213 11 51 31 -1 6602.5
12/31/1980 1980 12 31 214 14 50 32 0 6602.5
1/1/1981 1981 1 1 215 12 50 31 -1 6601.5
1/2/1981 1981 1 2 216 22 49 35.5 3.5 6605
1/3/1981 1981 1 3 217 14 51 32.5 0.5 6605.5
1/4/1981 1981 1 4 218 27 51 39 7 6612.5
1/5/1981 1981 1 5 219 35 53 44 12 6624.5
1/6/1981 1981 1 6 220 10 51 30.5 -1.5 6623
1/7/1981 1981 1 7 221 10 47 28.5 -3.5 6619.5
1/8/1981 1981 1 8 222 9 49 29 -3 6616.5
1/9/1981 1981 1 9 223 10 50 30 -2 6614.5
1/10/1981 1981 1 10 224 10 48 29 -3 6611.5
1/11/1981 1981 1 11 225 10 50 30 -2 6609.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
1/12/1981 1981 1 12 226 25 48 36.5 4.5 6614
1/13/1981 1981 1 13 227 43 53 48 16 6630
1/14/1981 1981 1 14 228 8 50 29 -3 6627
1/15/1981 1981 1 15 229 18 53 35.5 3.5 6630.5
1/16/1981 1981 1 16 230 25 47 36 4 6634.5
1/17/1981 1981 1 17 231 25 49 37 5 6639.5
1/18/1981 1981 1 18 232 15 53 34 2 6641.5
1/19/1981 1981 1 19 233 13 53 33 1 6642.5
1/20/1981 1981 1 20 234 15 57 36 4 6646.5
1/21/1981 1981 1 21 235 14 55 34.5 2.5 6649
1/22/1981 1981 1 22 236 14 55 34.5 2.5 6651.5
1/23/1981 1981 1 23 237 10 48 29 -3 6648.5
1/24/1981 1981 1 24 238 34 55 44.5 12.5 6661
1/25/1981 1981 1 25 239 16 50 33 1 6662
1/26/1981 1981 1 26 240 8 42 25 -7 6655
1/27/1981 1981 1 27 241 8 45 26.5 -5.5 6649.5
1/28/1981 1981 1 28 242 35 55 45 13 6662.5
1/29/1981 1981 1 29 243 18 53 35.5 3.5 6666
1/30/1981 1981 1 30 244 30 46 38 6 6672
1/31/1981 1981 1 31 245 35 42 38.5 6.5 6678.5
2/1/1981 1981 2 1 246 25 45 35 3 6681.5
2/2/1981 1981 2 2 247 8 45 26.5 -5.5 6676
2/3/1981 1981 2 3 248 9 47 28 -4 6672
2/4/1981 1981 2 4 249 20 47 33.5 1.5 6673.5
2/5/1981 1981 2 5 250 7 45 26 -6 6667.5
2/6/1981 1981 2 6 251 8 55 31.5 -0.5 6667
2/7/1981 1981 2 7 252 8 55 31.5 -0.5 6666.5
2/8/1981 1981 2 8 253 30 41 35.5 3.5 6670
2/9/1981 1981 2 9 254 34 54 44 12 6682
2/10/1981 1981 2 10 255 15 39 27 -5 6677
2/11/1981 1981 2 11 256 4 29 16.5 -15.5 6661.5
2/12/1981 1981 2 12 257 32 50 41 9 6670.5
2/13/1981 1981 2 13 258 9 53 31 -1 6669.5
2/14/1981 1981 2 14 259 22 55 38.5 6.5 6676
2/15/1981 1981 2 15 260 19 60 39.5 7.5 6683.5
2/16/1981 1981 2 16 261 23 60 41.5 9.5 6693
2/17/1981 1981 2 17 262 35 62 48.5 16.5 6709.5
2/18/1981 1981 2 18 263 25 65 45 13 6722.5
2/19/1981 1981 2 19 264 22 60 41 9 6731.5
2/20/1981 1981 2 20 265 38 48 43 11 6742.5
2/21/1981 1981 2 21 266 32 50 41 9 6751.5
2/22/1981 1981 2 22 267 13 57 35 3 6754.5
2/23/1981 1981 2 23 268 15 58 36.5 4.5 6759
2/24/1981 1981 2 24 269 35 67 51 19 6778
2/25/1981 1981 2 25 270 35 65 50 18 6796
2/26/1981 1981 2 26 271 35 50 42.5 10.5 6806.5
2/27/1981 1981 2 27 272 17 53 35 3 6809.5
2/28/1981 1981 2 28 273 16 55 35.5 3.5 6813
3/1/1981 1981 3 1 274 32 47 39.5 7.5 6820.5
3/2/1981 1981 3 2 275 38 54 46 14 6834.5
3/3/1981 1981 3 3 276 22 49 35.5 3.5 6838
3/4/1981 1981 3 4 277 25 60 42.5 10.5 6848.5
3/5/1981 1981 3 5 278 30 48 39 7 6855.5
3/6/1981 1981 3 6 279 35 52 43.5 11.5 6867
3/7/1981 1981 3 7 280 35 53 44 12 6879
3/8/1981 1981 3 8 281 32 57 44.5 12.5 6891.5
3/9/1981 1981 3 9 282 27 57 42 10 6901.5
3/10/1981 1981 3 10 283 38 54 46 14 6915.5
3/11/1981 1981 3 11 284 35 47 41 9 6924.5
3/12/1981 1981 3 12 285 40 55 47.5 15.5 6940
3/13/1981 1981 3 13 286 32 55 43.5 11.5 6951.5
3/14/1981 1981 3 14 287 35 54 44.5 12.5 6964
3/15/1981 1981 3 15 288 30 58 44 12 6976
3/16/1981 1981 3 16 289 32 61 46.5 14.5 6990.5
3/17/1981 1981 3 17 290 35 50 42.5 10.5 7001
3/18/1981 1981 3 18 291 32 53 42.5 10.5 7011.5
3/19/1981 1981 3 19 292 30 55 42.5 10.5 7022
3/20/1981 1981 3 20 293 40 59 49.5 17.5 7039.5
3/21/1981 1981 3 21 294 33 50 41.5 9.5 7049
3/22/1981 1981 3 22 295 29 63 46 14 7063
3/23/1981 1981 3 23 296 32 68 50 18 7081
3/24/1981 1981 3 24 297 43 63 53 21 7102
3/25/1981 1981 3 25 298 34 66 50 18 7120
3/26/1981 1981 3 26 299 45 70 57.5 25.5 7145.5
3/27/1981 1981 3 27 300 35 55 45 13 7158.5
3/28/1981 1981 3 28 301 37 54 45.5 13.5 7172
3/29/1981 1981 3 29 302 30 65 47.5 15.5 7187.5
3/30/1981 1981 3 30 303 38 50 44 12 7199.5
3/31/1981 1981 3 31 304 32 57 44.5 12.5 7212
4/1/1981 1981 4 1 305 42 70 56 24 7236
4/2/1981 1981 4 2 306 47 75 61 29 7265
4/3/1981 1981 4 3 307 40 47 43.5 11.5 7276.5
4/4/1981 1981 4 4 308 35 52 43.5 11.5 7288
4/5/1981 1981 4 5 309 29 61 45 13 7301
4/6/1981 1981 4 6 310 30 77 53.5 21.5 7322.5
4/7/1981 1981 4 7 311 56 68 62 30 7352.5
4/8/1981 1981 4 8 312 43 62 52.5 20.5 7373
4/9/1981 1981 4 9 313 45 78 61.5 29.5 7402.5
4/10/1981 1981 4 10 314 55 78 66.5 34.5 7437
4/11/1981 1981 4 11 315 60 80 70 38 7475
4/12/1981 1981 4 12 316 48 75 61.5 29.5 7504.5
4/13/1981 1981 4 13 317 47 75 61 29 7533.5
4/14/1981 1981 4 14 318 51 77 64 32 7565.5
4/15/1981 1981 4 15 319 52 77 64.5 32.5 7598
4/16/1981 1981 4 16 320 51 78 64.5 32.5 7630.5
4/17/1981 1981 4 17 321 53 84 68.5 36.5 7667
4/18/1981 1981 4 18 322 53 77 65 33 7700
4/19/1981 1981 4 19 323 45 61 53 21 7721
4/20/1981 1981 4 20 324 46 72 59 27 7748
4/21/1981 1981 4 21 325 47 80 63.5 31.5 7779.5
4/22/1981 1981 4 22 326 54 74 64 32 7811.5
4/23/1981 1981 4 23 327 52 75 63.5 31.5 7843
4/24/1981 1981 4 24 328 54 90 72 40 7883
4/25/1981 1981 4 25 329 52 89 70.5 38.5 7921.5
4/26/1981 1981 4 26 330 66 87 76.5 44.5 7966
4/27/1981 1981 4 27 331 57 87 72 40 8006
4/28/1981 1981 4 28 332 45 80 62.5 30.5 8036.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
4/29/1981 1981 4 29 333 57 86 71.5 39.5 8076
4/30/1981 1981 4 30 334 60 92 76 44 8120
5/1/1981 1981 5 1 335 63 88 75.5 43.5 8163.5
5/2/1981 1981 5 2 336 60 80 70 38 8201.5
5/3/1981 1981 5 3 337 57 63 60 28 8229.5
5/4/1981 1981 5 4 338 45 73 59 27 8256.5
5/5/1981 1981 5 5 339 39 77 58 26 8282.5
5/6/1981 1981 5 6 340 52 75 63.5 31.5 8314
5/7/1981 1981 5 7 341 45 70 57.5 25.5 8339.5
5/8/1981 1981 5 8 342 52 62 57 25 8364.5
5/9/1981 1981 5 9 343 46 67 56.5 24.5 8389
5/10/1981 1981 5 10 344 51 78 64.5 32.5 8421.5
5/11/1981 1981 5 11 345 54 71 62.5 30.5 8452
5/12/1981 1981 5 12 346 64 78 71 39 8491
5/13/1981 1981 5 13 347 53 72 62.5 30.5 8521.5
5/14/1981 1981 5 14 348 47 88 67.5 35.5 8557
5/15/1981 1981 5 15 349 53 75 64 32 8589
5/16/1981 1981 5 16 350 48 58 53 21 8610
5/17/1981 1981 5 17 351 48 67 57.5 25.5 8635.5
5/18/1981 1981 5 18 352 52 52 52 20 8655.5
5/19/1981 1981 5 19 353 53 78 65.5 33.5 8689
5/20/1981 1981 5 20 354 46 60 53 21 8710
5/21/1981 1981 5 21 355 35 75 55 23 8733
5/22/1981 1981 5 22 356 63 74 68.5 36.5 8769.5
5/23/1981 1981 5 23 357 57 77 67 35 8804.5
5/24/1981 1981 5 24 358 63 82 72.5 40.5 8845
5/25/1981 1981 5 25 359 68 87 77.5 45.5 8890.5
5/26/1981 1981 5 26 360 67 78 72.5 40.5 8931
5/27/1981 1981 5 27 361 57 83 70 38 8969
5/28/1981 1981 5 28 362 60 73 66.5 34.5 9003.5
5/29/1981 1981 5 29 363 65 79 72 40 9043.5
5/30/1981 1981 5 30 364 44 85 64.5 32.5 9076
5/31/1981 1981 5 31 365 61 87 74 42 9118
6/1/1981 1981 6 1 1 68 85 76.5 44.5 44.5
6/2/1981 1981 6 2 2 68 86 77 45 89.5
6/3/1981 1981 6 3 3 58 83 70.5 38.5 128
6/4/1981 1981 6 4 4 69 86 77.5 45.5 173.5
6/5/1981 1981 6 5 5 66 85 75.5 43.5 217
6/6/1981 1981 6 6 6 70 103 86.5 54.5 271.5
6/7/1981 1981 6 7 7 75 103 89 57 328.5
6/8/1981 1981 6 8 8 77 102 89.5 57.5 386
6/9/1981 1981 6 9 9 78 103 90.5 58.5 444.5
6/10/1981 1981 6 10 10 75 105 90 58 502.5
6/11/1981 1981 6 11 11 61 99 80 48 550.5
6/12/1981 1981 6 12 12 80 98 89 57 607.5
6/13/1981 1981 6 13 13 60 87 73.5 41.5 649
6/14/1981 1981 6 14 14 53 64 58.5 26.5 675.5
6/15/1981 1981 6 15 15 54 78 66 34 709.5
6/16/1981 1981 6 16 16 72 88 80 48 757.5
6/17/1981 1981 6 17 17 71 92 81.5 49.5 807
6/18/1981 1981 6 18 18 64 93 78.5 46.5 853.5
6/19/1981 1981 6 19 19 67 100 83.5 51.5 905
6/20/1981 1981 6 20 20 77 102 89.5 57.5 962.5
6/21/1981 1981 6 21 21 76 98 87 55 1017.5
6/22/1981 1981 6 22 22 60 102 81 49 1066.5
6/23/1981 1981 6 23 23 75 97 86 54 1120.5
6/24/1981 1981 6 24 24 76 105 90.5 58.5 1179
6/25/1981 1981 6 25 25 77 106 91.5 59.5 1238.5
6/26/1981 1981 6 26 26 82 108 95 63 1301.5
6/27/1981 1981 6 27 27 78 92 85 53 1354.5
6/28/1981 1981 6 28 28 68 91 79.5 47.5 1402
6/29/1981 1981 6 29 29 70 93 81.5 49.5 1451.5
6/30/1981 1981 6 30 30 72 95 83.5 51.5 1503
7/1/1981 1981 7 1 31 65 80 72.5 40.5 1543.5
7/2/1981 1981 7 2 32 68 90 79 47 1590.5
7/3/1981 1981 7 3 33 67 95 81 49 1639.5
7/4/1981 1981 7 4 34 77 93 85 53 1692.5
7/5/1981 1981 7 5 35 77 104 90.5 58.5 1751
7/6/1981 1981 7 6 36 77 103 90 58 1809
7/7/1981 1981 7 7 37 78 95 86.5 54.5 1863.5
7/8/1981 1981 7 8 38 80 100 90 58 1921.5
7/9/1981 1981 7 9 39 72 101 86.5 54.5 1976
7/10/1981 1981 7 10 40 74 94 84 52 2028
7/11/1981 1981 7 11 41 70 95 82.5 50.5 2078.5
7/12/1981 1981 7 12 42 65 85 75 43 2121.5
7/13/1981 1981 7 13 43 72 83 77.5 45.5 2167
7/14/1981 1981 7 14 44 77 100 88.5 56.5 2223.5
7/15/1981 1981 7 15 45 77 97 87 55 2278.5
7/16/1981 1981 7 16 46 77 83 80 48 2326.5
7/17/1981 1981 7 17 47 73 92 82.5 50.5 2377
7/18/1981 1981 7 18 48 72 97 84.5 52.5 2429.5
7/19/1981 1981 7 19 49 75 106 90.5 58.5 2488
7/20/1981 1981 7 20 50 70 105 87.5 55.5 2543.5
7/21/1981 1981 7 21 51 73 108 90.5 58.5 2602
7/22/1981 1981 7 22 52 81 105 93 61 2663
7/23/1981 1981 7 23 53 80 97 88.5 56.5 2719.5
7/24/1981 1981 7 24 54 75 100 87.5 55.5 2775
7/25/1981 1981 7 25 55 73 104 88.5 56.5 2831.5
7/26/1981 1981 7 26 56 75 89 82 50 2881.5
7/27/1981 1981 7 27 57 68 96 82 50 2931.5
7/28/1981 1981 7 28 58 73 103 88 56 2987.5
7/29/1981 1981 7 29 59 70 105 87.5 55.5 3043
7/30/1981 1981 7 30 60 72 95 83.5 51.5 3094.5
7/31/1981 1981 7 31 61 73 100 86.5 54.5 3149
8/1/1981 1981 8 1 62 69 100 84.5 52.5 3201.5
8/2/1981 1981 8 2 63 71 98 84.5 52.5 3254
8/3/1981 1981 8 3 64 73 102 87.5 55.5 3309.5
8/4/1981 1981 8 4 65 72 101 86.5 54.5 3364
8/5/1981 1981 8 5 66 69 104 86.5 54.5 3418.5
8/6/1981 1981 8 6 67 70 104 87 55 3473.5
8/7/1981 1981 8 7 68 69 103 86 54 3527.5
8/8/1981 1981 8 8 69 76 99 87.5 55.5 3583
8/9/1981 1981 8 9 70 75 103 89 57 3640
8/10/1981 1981 8 10 71 65 82 73.5 41.5 3681.5
8/11/1981 1981 8 11 72 57 75 66 34 3715.5
8/12/1981 1981 8 12 73 58 73 65.5 33.5 3749
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
8/13/1981 1981 8 13 74 62 83 72.5 40.5 3789.5
8/14/1981 1981 8 14 75 62 90 76 44 3833.5
8/16/1981 1981 8 16 77 67 89 78 46 3879.5
8/17/1981 1981 8 17 78 70 95 82.5 50.5 3930
8/18/1981 1981 8 18 79 70 95 82.5 50.5 3980.5
8/19/1981 1981 8 19 80 66 97 81.5 49.5 4030
8/20/1981 1981 8 20 81 68 102 85 53 4083
8/21/1981 1981 8 21 82 62 87 74.5 42.5 4125.5
8/22/1981 1981 8 22 83 57 82 69.5 37.5 4163
8/23/1981 1981 8 23 84 65 94 79.5 47.5 4210.5
8/24/1981 1981 8 24 85 67 95 81 49 4259.5
8/25/1981 1981 8 25 86 76 92 84 52 4311.5
8/26/1981 1981 8 26 87 72 93 82.5 50.5 4362
8/27/1981 1981 8 27 88 68 93 80.5 48.5 4410.5
8/28/1981 1981 8 28 89 70 97 83.5 51.5 4462
8/29/1981 1981 8 29 90 69 94 81.5 49.5 4511.5
8/30/1981 1981 8 30 91 70 93 81.5 49.5 4561
8/31/1981 1981 8 31 92 74 87 80.5 48.5 4609.5
9/1/1981 1981 9 1 93 55 93 74 42 4651.5
9/2/1981 1981 9 2 94 78 98 88 56 4707.5
9/3/1981 1981 9 3 95 73 93 83 51 4758.5
9/4/1981 1981 9 4 96 62 97 79.5 47.5 4806
9/5/1981 1981 9 5 97 53 74 63.5 31.5 4837.5
9/6/1981 1981 9 6 98 56 72 64 32 4869.5
9/7/1981 1981 9 7 99 66 76 71 39 4908.5
9/8/1981 1981 9 8 100 55 77 66 34 4942.5
9/9/1981 1981 9 9 101 55 70 62.5 30.5 4973
9/10/1981 1981 9 10 102 56 74 65 33 5006
9/11/1981 1981 9 11 103 56 80 68 36 5042
9/12/1981 1981 9 12 104 60 82 71 39 5081
9/13/1981 1981 9 13 105 60 85 72.5 40.5 5121.5
9/14/1981 1981 9 14 106 55 85 70 38 5159.5
9/15/1981 1981 9 15 107 55 86 70.5 38.5 5198
9/16/1981 1981 9 16 108 62 90 76 44 5242
9/17/1981 1981 9 17 109 60 77 68.5 36.5 5278.5
9/18/1981 1981 9 18 110 49 87 68 36 5314.5
9/19/1981 1981 9 19 111 48 92 70 38 5352.5
9/20/1981 1981 9 20 112 60 95 77.5 45.5 5398
9/21/1981 1981 9 21 113 58 90 74 42 5440
9/22/1981 1981 9 22 114 76 91 83.5 51.5 5491.5
9/23/1981 1981 9 23 115 58 88 73 41 5532.5
9/24/1981 1981 9 24 116 65 84 74.5 42.5 5575
9/25/1981 1981 9 25 117 60 85 72.5 40.5 5615.5
9/26/1981 1981 9 26 118 50 82 66 34 5649.5
9/27/1981 1981 9 27 119 60 86 73 41 5690.5
9/28/1981 1981 9 28 120 60 90 75 43 5733.5
9/29/1981 1981 9 29 121 57 82 69.5 37.5 5771
9/30/1981 1981 9 30 122 51 80 65.5 33.5 5804.5
10/1/1981 1981 10 1 123 51 80 65.5 33.5 5838
10/2/1981 1981 10 2 124 52 59 55.5 23.5 5861.5
10/3/1981 1981 10 3 125 53 61 57 25 5886.5
10/4/1981 1981 10 4 126 52 72 62 30 5916.5
10/5/1981 1981 10 5 127 45 58 51.5 19.5 5936
10/6/1981 1981 10 6 128 47 75 61 29 5965
10/7/1981 1981 10 7 129 50 78 64 32 5997
10/8/1981 1981 10 8 130 50 70 60 28 6025
10/9/1981 1981 10 9 131 35 68 51.5 19.5 6044.5
10/10/1981 1981 10 10 132 42 71 56.5 24.5 6069
10/11/1981 1981 10 11 133 47 63 55 23 6092
10/12/1981 1981 10 12 134 46 67 56.5 24.5 6116.5
10/13/1981 1981 10 13 135 42 60 51 19 6135.5
10/14/1981 1981 10 14 136 39 62 50.5 18.5 6154
10/15/1981 1981 10 15 137 40 45 42.5 10.5 6164.5
10/16/1981 1981 10 16 138 40 60 50 18 6182.5
10/17/1981 1981 10 17 139 32 59 45.5 13.5 6196
10/18/1981 1981 10 18 140 35 65 50 18 6214
10/19/1981 1981 10 19 141 34 65 49.5 17.5 6231.5
10/20/1981 1981 10 20 142 34 40 37 5 6236.5
10/21/1981 1981 10 21 143 40 67 53.5 21.5 6258
10/22/1981 1981 10 22 144 32 65 48.5 16.5 6274.5
10/23/1981 1981 10 23 145 30 65 47.5 15.5 6290
10/24/1981 1981 10 24 146 50 65 57.5 25.5 6315.5
10/25/1981 1981 10 25 147 30 65 47.5 15.5 6331
10/26/1981 1981 10 26 148 28 40 34 2 6333
10/27/1981 1981 10 27 149 37 67 52 20 6353
10/28/1981 1981 10 28 150 59 67 63 31 6384
10/29/1981 1981 10 29 151 42 60 51 19 6403
10/30/1981 1981 10 30 152 35 50 42.5 10.5 6413.5
10/31/1981 1981 10 31 153 20 53 36.5 4.5 6418
11/1/1981 1981 11 1 154 40 63 51.5 19.5 6437.5
11/2/1981 1981 11 2 155 25 65 45 13 6450.5
11/3/1981 1981 11 3 156 27 67 47 15 6465.5
11/4/1981 1981 11 4 157 25 65 45 13 6478.5
11/5/1981 1981 11 5 158 30 60 45 13 6491.5
11/6/1981 1981 11 6 159 38 55 46.5 14.5 6506
11/7/1981 1981 11 7 160 38 57 47.5 15.5 6521.5
11/8/1981 1981 11 8 161 30 61 45.5 13.5 6535
11/9/1981 1981 11 9 162 27 58 42.5 10.5 6545.5
11/10/1981 1981 11 10 163 28 60 44 12 6557.5
11/11/1981 1981 11 11 164 29 58 43.5 11.5 6569
11/12/1981 1981 11 12 165 25 60 42.5 10.5 6579.5
11/13/1981 1981 11 13 166 50 60 55 23 6602.5
11/14/1981 1981 11 14 167 43 43 43 11 6613.5
11/15/1981 1981 11 15 168 34 65 49.5 17.5 6631
11/16/1981 1981 11 16 169 26 64 45 13 6644
11/17/1981 1981 11 17 170 27 60 43.5 11.5 6655.5
11/18/1981 1981 11 18 171 30 48 39 7 6662.5
11/19/1981 1981 11 19 172 19 50 34.5 2.5 6665
11/20/1981 1981 11 20 173 15 45 30 -2 6663
11/21/1981 1981 11 21 174 18 50 34 2 6665
11/22/1981 1981 11 22 175 22 52 37 5 6670
11/23/1981 1981 11 23 176 22 55 38.5 6.5 6676.5
11/24/1981 1981 11 24 177 22 65 43.5 11.5 6688
11/25/1981 1981 11 25 178 30 55 42.5 10.5 6698.5
11/26/1981 1981 11 26 179 11 45 28 -4 6694.5
11/27/1981 1981 11 27 180 22 37 29.5 -2.5 6692
11/28/1981 1981 11 28 181 27 38 32.5 0.5 6692.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
11/29/1981 1981 11 29 182 29 36 32.5 0.5 6693
11/30/1981 1981 11 30 183 16 40 28 -4 6689
12/1/1981 1981 12 1 184 17 35 26 -6 6683
12/2/1981 1981 12 2 185 14 35 24.5 -7.5 6675.5
12/3/1981 1981 12 3 186 15 43 29 -3 6672.5
12/4/1981 1981 12 4 187 17 45 31 -1 6671.5
12/5/1981 1981 12 5 188 25 45 35 3 6674.5
12/6/1981 1981 12 6 189 18 48 33 1 6675.5
12/7/1981 1981 12 7 190 18 48 33 1 6676.5
12/8/1981 1981 12 8 191 18 50 34 2 6678.5
12/9/1981 1981 12 9 192 19 48 33.5 1.5 6680
12/10/1981 1981 12 10 193 32 48 40 8 6688
12/11/1981 1981 12 11 194 25 48 36.5 4.5 6692.5
12/12/1981 1981 12 12 195 22 48 35 3 6695.5
12/13/1981 1981 12 13 196 28 53 40.5 8.5 6704
12/14/1981 1981 12 14 197 22 45 33.5 1.5 6705.5
12/15/1981 1981 12 15 198 19 45 32 0 6705.5
12/16/1981 1981 12 16 199 22 45 33.5 1.5 6707
12/17/1981 1981 12 17 200 15 40 27.5 -4.5 6702.5
12/18/1981 1981 12 18 201 11 38 24.5 -7.5 6695
12/19/1981 1981 12 19 202 20 41 30.5 -1.5 6693.5
12/20/1981 1981 12 20 203 18 49 33.5 1.5 6695
12/21/1981 1981 12 21 204 35 49 42 10 6705
12/22/1981 1981 12 22 205 25 40 32.5 0.5 6705.5
12/23/1981 1981 12 23 206 8 33 20.5 -11.5 6694
12/24/1981 1981 12 24 207 8 37 22.5 -9.5 6684.5
12/25/1981 1981 12 25 208 12 39 25.5 -6.5 6678
12/26/1981 1981 12 26 209 10 43 26.5 -5.5 6672.5
12/27/1981 1981 12 27 210 22 47 34.5 2.5 6675
12/28/1981 1981 12 28 211 7 37 22 -10 6665
12/29/1981 1981 12 29 212 14 38 26 -6 6659
12/30/1981 1981 12 30 213 40 58 49 17 6676
12/31/1981 1981 12 31 214 32 34 33 1 6677
1/1/1982 1982 1 1 215 23 52 37.5 5.5 6682.5
1/2/1982 1982 1 2 216 18 30 24 -8 6674.5
1/3/1982 1982 1 3 217 9 38 23.5 -8.5 6666
1/4/1982 1982 1 4 218 23 32 27.5 -4.5 6661.5
1/5/1982 1982 1 5 219 27 48 37.5 5.5 6667
1/6/1982 1982 1 6 220 12 35 23.5 -8.5 6658.5
1/7/1982 1982 1 7 221 0 27 13.5 -18.5 6640
1/8/1982 1982 1 8 222 -2 25 11.5 -20.5 6619.5
1/9/1982 1982 1 9 223 3 32 17.5 -14.5 6605
1/10/1982 1982 1 10 224 5 37 21 -11 6594
1/11/1982 1982 1 11 225 5 28 16.5 -15.5 6578.5
1/12/1982 1982 1 12 226 5 37 21 -11 6567.5
1/13/1982 1982 1 13 227 18 42 30 -2 6565.5
1/14/1982 1982 1 14 228 7 40 23.5 -8.5 6557
1/15/1982 1982 1 15 229 7 49 28 -4 6553
1/16/1982 1982 1 16 230 26 46 36 4 6557
1/17/1982 1982 1 17 231 12 45 28.5 -3.5 6553.5
1/18/1982 1982 1 18 232 20 53 36.5 4.5 6558
1/19/1982 1982 1 19 233 21 55 38 6 6564
1/20/1982 1982 1 20 234 31 45 38 6 6570
1/21/1982 1982 1 21 235 18 34 26 -6 6564
1/22/1982 1982 1 22 236 7 39 23 -9 6555
1/23/1982 1982 1 23 237 9 30 19.5 -12.5 6542.5
1/24/1982 1982 1 24 238 8 42 25 -7 6535.5
1/25/1982 1982 1 25 239 10 40 25 -7 6528.5
1/26/1982 1982 1 26 240 8 48 28 -4 6524.5
1/27/1982 1982 1 27 241 22 45 33.5 1.5 6526
1/28/1982 1982 1 28 242 18 40 29 -3 6523
1/29/1982 1982 1 29 243 22 45 33.5 1.5 6524.5
1/30/1982 1982 1 30 244 0 36 18 -14 6510.5
1/31/1982 1982 1 31 245 3 34 18.5 -13.5 6497
2/1/1982 1982 2 1 246 4 43 23.5 -8.5 6488.5
2/2/1982 1982 2 2 247 -1 40 19.5 -12.5 6476
2/3/1982 1982 2 3 248 18 30 24 -8 6468
2/4/1982 1982 2 4 249 10 30 20 -12 6456
2/5/1982 1982 2 5 250 -6 27 10.5 -21.5 6434.5
2/6/1982 1982 2 6 251 -13 22 4.5 -27.5 6407
2/7/1982 1982 2 7 252 -16 25 4.5 -27.5 6379.5
2/8/1982 1982 2 8 253 3 35 19 -13 6366.5
2/9/1982 1982 2 9 254 13 29 21 -11 6355.5
2/10/1982 1982 2 10 255 11 40 25.5 -6.5 6349
2/11/1982 1982 2 11 256 15 47 31 -1 6348
2/12/1982 1982 2 12 257 8 42 25 -7 6341
2/13/1982 1982 2 13 258 15 44 29.5 -2.5 6338.5
2/14/1982 1982 2 14 259 24 42 33 1 6339.5
2/15/1982 1982 2 15 260 32 40 36 4 6343.5
2/16/1982 1982 2 16 261 32 37 34.5 2.5 6346
2/17/1982 1982 2 17 262 32 35 33.5 1.5 6347.5
2/18/1982 1982 2 18 263 29 45 37 5 6352.5
2/19/1982 1982 2 19 264 24 50 37 5 6357.5
2/20/1982 1982 2 20 265 25 55 40 8 6365.5
2/21/1982 1982 2 21 266 25 58 41.5 9.5 6375
2/22/1982 1982 2 22 267 28 57 42.5 10.5 6385.5
2/23/1982 1982 2 23 268 35 61 48 16 6401.5
2/24/1982 1982 2 24 269 28 55 41.5 9.5 6411
2/25/1982 1982 2 25 270 30 58 44 12 6423
2/26/1982 1982 2 26 271 28 61 44.5 12.5 6435.5
2/27/1982 1982 2 27 272 29 65 47 15 6450.5
2/28/1982 1982 2 28 273 28 63 45.5 13.5 6464
3/1/1982 1982 3 1 274 47 55 51 19 6483
3/2/1982 1982 3 2 275 37 58 47.5 15.5 6498.5
3/3/1982 1982 3 3 276 35 58 46.5 14.5 6513
3/4/1982 1982 3 4 277 30 43 36.5 4.5 6517.5
3/5/1982 1982 3 5 278 25 45 35 3 6520.5
3/6/1982 1982 3 6 279 17 50 33.5 1.5 6522
3/7/1982 1982 3 7 280 20 59 39.5 7.5 6529.5
3/8/1982 1982 3 8 281 36 63 49.5 17.5 6547
3/9/1982 1982 3 9 282 28 68 48 16 6563
3/10/1982 1982 3 10 283 34 60 47 15 6578
3/11/1982 1982 3 11 284 37 61 49 17 6595
3/12/1982 1982 3 12 285 40 59 49.5 17.5 6612.5
3/13/1982 1982 3 13 286 25 65 45 13 6625.5
3/14/1982 1982 3 14 287 33 57 45 13 6638.5
3/15/1982 1982 3 15 288 42 57 49.5 17.5 6656
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
3/16/1982 1982 3 16 289 40 58 49 17 6673
3/17/1982 1982 3 17 290 39 59 49 17 6690
3/18/1982 1982 3 18 291 37 65 51 19 6709
3/19/1982 1982 3 19 292 28 52 40 8 6717
3/20/1982 1982 3 20 293 18 53 35.5 3.5 6720.5
3/21/1982 1982 3 21 294 22 48 35 3 6723.5
3/22/1982 1982 3 22 295 25 53 39 7 6730.5
3/23/1982 1982 3 23 296 37 58 47.5 15.5 6746
3/24/1982 1982 3 24 297 26 66 46 14 6760
3/25/1982 1982 3 25 298 32 67 49.5 17.5 6777.5
3/26/1982 1982 3 26 299 38 53 45.5 13.5 6791
3/27/1982 1982 3 27 300 42 61 51.5 19.5 6810.5
3/28/1982 1982 3 28 301 38 68 53 21 6831.5
3/29/1982 1982 3 29 302 40 48 44 12 6843.5
3/30/1982 1982 3 30 303 36 49 42.5 10.5 6854
3/31/1982 1982 3 31 304 36 64 50 18 6872
4/1/1982 1982 4 1 305 42 67 54.5 22.5 6894.5
4/2/1982 1982 4 2 306 34 50 42 10 6904.5
4/3/1982 1982 4 3 307 46 65 55.5 23.5 6928
4/4/1982 1982 4 4 308 39 67 53 21 6949
4/5/1982 1982 4 5 309 39 55 47 15 6964
4/6/1982 1982 4 6 310 40 67 53.5 21.5 6985.5
4/7/1982 1982 4 7 311 31 49 40 8 6993.5
4/8/1982 1982 4 8 312 30 54 42 10 7003.5
4/9/1982 1982 4 9 313 38 57 47.5 15.5 7019
4/10/1982 1982 4 10 314 30 65 47.5 15.5 7034.5
4/11/1982 1982 4 11 315 42 72 57 25 7059.5
4/12/1982 1982 4 12 316 57 72 64.5 32.5 7092
4/13/1982 1982 4 13 317 51 78 64.5 32.5 7124.5
4/14/1982 1982 4 14 318 53 77 65 33 7157.5
4/15/1982 1982 4 15 319 50 72 61 29 7186.5
4/16/1982 1982 4 16 320 37 58 47.5 15.5 7202
4/17/1982 1982 4 17 321 38 73 55.5 23.5 7225.5
4/18/1982 1982 4 18 322 43 72 57.5 25.5 7251
4/19/1982 1982 4 19 323 38 54 46 14 7265
4/20/1982 1982 4 20 324 30 48 39 7 7272
4/21/1982 1982 4 21 325 36 59 47.5 15.5 7287.5
4/22/1982 1982 4 22 326 43 67 55 23 7310.5
4/23/1982 1982 4 23 327 46 62 54 22 7332.5
4/24/1982 1982 4 24 328 46 75 60.5 28.5 7361
4/25/1982 1982 4 25 329 50 77 63.5 31.5 7392.5
4/26/1982 1982 4 26 330 50 83 66.5 34.5 7427
4/27/1982 1982 4 27 331 52 75 63.5 31.5 7458.5
4/28/1982 1982 4 28 332 50 83 66.5 34.5 7493
4/29/1982 1982 4 29 333 55 71 63 31 7524
4/30/1982 1982 4 30 334 62 80 71 39 7563
5/1/1982 1982 5 1 335 62 85 73.5 41.5 7604.5
5/2/1982 1982 5 2 336 53 75 64 32 7636.5
5/3/1982 1982 5 3 337 53 74 63.5 31.5 7668
5/4/1982 1982 5 4 338 45 75 60 28 7696
5/5/1982 1982 5 5 339 50 64 57 25 7721
5/6/1982 1982 5 6 340 45 70 57.5 25.5 7746.5
5/7/1982 1982 5 7 341 50 72 61 29 7775.5
5/8/1982 1982 5 8 342 58 83 70.5 38.5 7814
5/9/1982 1982 5 9 343 58 74 66 34 7848
5/10/1982 1982 5 10 344 39 68 53.5 21.5 7869.5
5/11/1982 1982 5 11 345 50 67 58.5 26.5 7896
5/12/1982 1982 5 12 346 50 69 59.5 27.5 7923.5
5/13/1982 1982 5 13 347 55 69 62 30 7953.5
5/14/1982 1982 5 14 348 53 74 63.5 31.5 7985
5/15/1982 1982 5 15 349 55 75 65 33 8018
5/16/1982 1982 5 16 350 40 77 58.5 26.5 8044.5
5/17/1982 1982 5 17 351 55 81 68 36 8080.5
5/18/1982 1982 5 18 352 57 83 70 38 8118.5
5/19/1982 1982 5 19 353 58 73 65.5 33.5 8152
5/20/1982 1982 5 20 354 38 77 57.5 25.5 8177.5
5/21/1982 1982 5 21 355 59 87 73 41 8218.5
5/22/1982 1982 5 22 356 63 90 76.5 44.5 8263
5/23/1982 1982 5 23 357 51 85 68 36 8299
5/24/1982 1982 5 24 358 65 87 76 44 8343
5/25/1982 1982 5 25 359 66 87 76.5 44.5 8387.5
5/26/1982 1982 5 26 360 65 93 79 47 8434.5
5/27/1982 1982 5 27 361 67 90 78.5 46.5 8481
5/28/1982 1982 5 28 362 57 75 66 34 8515
5/29/1982 1982 5 29 363 59 83 71 39 8554
5/30/1982 1982 5 30 364 51 73 62 30 8584
5/31/1982 1982 5 31 365 40 82 61 29 8613
6/1/1982 1982 6 1 1 63 87 75 43 43
6/2/1982 1982 6 2 2 61 85 73 41 84
6/3/1982 1982 6 3 3 61 85 73 41 125
6/4/1982 1982 6 4 4 45 87 66 34 159
6/5/1982 1982 6 5 5 52 83 67.5 35.5 194.5
6/6/1982 1982 6 6 6 39 81 60 28 222.5
6/7/1982 1982 6 7 7 39 85 62 30 252.5
6/8/1982 1982 6 8 8 65 82 73.5 41.5 294
6/9/1982 1982 6 9 9 65 82 73.5 41.5 335.5
6/10/1982 1982 6 10 10 48 92 70 38 373.5
6/11/1982 1982 6 11 11 67 92 79.5 47.5 421
6/12/1982 1982 6 12 12 65 92 78.5 46.5 467.5
6/13/1982 1982 6 13 13 60 92 76 44 511.5
6/14/1982 1982 6 14 14 64 84 74 42 553.5
6/15/1982 1982 6 15 15 51 80 65.5 33.5 587
6/16/1982 1982 6 16 16 67 94 80.5 48.5 635.5
6/17/1982 1982 6 17 17 72 89 80.5 48.5 684
6/18/1982 1982 6 18 18 56 86 71 39 723
6/19/1982 1982 6 19 19 63 83 73 41 764
6/20/1982 1982 6 20 20 67 87 77 45 809
6/21/1982 1982 6 21 21 55 92 73.5 41.5 850.5
6/22/1982 1982 6 22 22 63 91 77 45 895.5
6/23/1982 1982 6 23 23 52 90 71 39 934.5
6/24/1982 1982 6 24 24 72 94 83 51 985.5
7/7/1982 1982 7 7 37 77 89 83 51 1036.5
7/8/1982 1982 7 8 38 62 90 76 44 1080.5
7/9/1982 1982 7 9 39 65 90 77.5 45.5 1126
7/10/1982 1982 7 10 40 74 93 83.5 51.5 1177.5
7/11/1982 1982 7 11 41 70 98 84 52 1229.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
7/12/1982 1982 7 12 42 73 103 88 56 1285.5
7/13/1982 1982 7 13 43 72 105 88.5 56.5 1342
7/14/1982 1982 7 14 44 70 105 87.5 55.5 1397.5
7/15/1982 1982 7 15 45 80 103 91.5 59.5 1457
7/16/1982 1982 7 16 46 85 100 92.5 60.5 1517.5
7/17/1982 1982 7 17 47 82 101 91.5 59.5 1577
7/18/1982 1982 7 18 48 73 103 88 56 1633
7/19/1982 1982 7 19 49 75 100 87.5 55.5 1688.5
7/20/1982 1982 7 20 50 76 105 90.5 58.5 1747
7/21/1982 1982 7 21 51 78 100 89 57 1804
7/22/1982 1982 7 22 52 78 102 90 58 1862
7/23/1982 1982 7 23 53 76 100 88 56 1918
7/24/1982 1982 7 24 54 72 100 86 54 1972
7/25/1982 1982 7 25 55 71 97 84 52 2024
7/26/1982 1982 7 26 56 72 97 84.5 52.5 2076.5
7/27/1982 1982 7 27 57 70 88 79 47 2123.5
7/28/1982 1982 7 28 58 65 92 78.5 46.5 2170
7/29/1982 1982 7 29 59 68 89 78.5 46.5 2216.5
7/30/1982 1982 7 30 60 72 93 82.5 50.5 2267
7/31/1982 1982 7 31 61 76 98 87 55 2322
8/1/1982 1982 8 1 62 68 98 83 51 2373
8/2/1982 1982 8 2 63 71 85 78 46 2419
8/3/1982 1982 8 3 64 69 92 80.5 48.5 2467.5
8/4/1982 1982 8 4 65 70 95 82.5 50.5 2518
8/5/1982 1982 8 5 66 70 95 82.5 50.5 2568.5
8/6/1982 1982 8 6 67 69 100 84.5 52.5 2621
8/7/1982 1982 8 7 68 72 98 85 53 2674
8/8/1982 1982 8 8 69 73 96 84.5 52.5 2726.5
8/9/1982 1982 8 9 70 70 87 78.5 46.5 2773
8/10/1982 1982 8 10 71 68 100 84 52 2825
8/11/1982 1982 8 11 72 72 90 81 49 2874
8/12/1982 1982 8 12 73 73 89 81 49 2923
8/13/1982 1982 8 13 74 61 76 68.5 36.5 2959.5
8/14/1982 1982 8 14 75 58 87 72.5 40.5 3000
8/15/1982 1982 8 15 76 70 90 80 48 3048
8/16/1982 1982 8 16 77 65 82 73.5 41.5 3089.5
8/17/1982 1982 8 17 78 68 94 81 49 3138.5
8/18/1982 1982 8 18 79 65 91 78 46 3184.5
8/19/1982 1982 8 19 80 72 93 82.5 50.5 3235
8/20/1982 1982 8 20 81 68 98 83 51 3286
8/21/1982 1982 8 21 82 70 99 84.5 52.5 3338.5
8/22/1982 1982 8 22 83 73 90 81.5 49.5 3388
8/23/1982 1982 8 23 84 71 93 82 50 3438
8/24/1982 1982 8 24 85 65 81 73 41 3479
8/25/1982 1982 8 25 86 61 75 68 36 3515
8/26/1982 1982 8 26 87 59 83 71 39 3554
8/27/1982 1982 8 27 88 59 85 72 40 3594
8/28/1982 1982 8 28 89 57 95 76 44 3638
8/29/1982 1982 8 29 90 60 92 76 44 3682
8/30/1982 1982 8 30 91 72 96 84 52 3734
8/31/1982 1982 8 31 92 73 98 85.5 53.5 3787.5
9/1/1982 1982 9 1 93 55 94 74.5 42.5 3830
9/2/1982 1982 9 2 94 78 93 85.5 53.5 3883.5
9/3/1982 1982 9 3 95 82 100 91 59 3942.5
9/4/1982 1982 9 4 96 65 93 79 47 3989.5
9/5/1982 1982 9 5 97 63 88 75.5 43.5 4033
9/6/1982 1982 9 6 98 65 85 75 43 4076
9/7/1982 1982 9 7 99 62 80 71 39 4115
9/8/1982 1982 9 8 100 60 85 72.5 40.5 4155.5
9/9/1982 1982 9 9 101 55 90 72.5 40.5 4196
9/10/1982 1982 9 10 102 68 89 78.5 46.5 4242.5
9/11/1982 1982 9 11 103 55 75 65 33 4275.5
9/12/1982 1982 9 12 104 51 74 62.5 30.5 4306
9/13/1982 1982 9 13 105 45 59 52 20 4326
9/14/1982 1982 9 14 106 45 58 51.5 19.5 4345.5
9/15/1982 1982 9 15 107 38 75 56.5 24.5 4370
9/16/1982 1982 9 16 108 56 78 67 35 4405
9/17/1982 1982 9 17 109 58 82 70 38 4443
9/18/1982 1982 9 18 110 52 80 66 34 4477
9/19/1982 1982 9 19 111 56 82 69 37 4514
9/20/1982 1982 9 20 112 57 83 70 38 4552
9/21/1982 1982 9 21 113 57 89 73 41 4593
9/22/1982 1982 9 22 114 59 89 74 42 4635
9/23/1982 1982 9 23 115 55 93 74 42 4677
9/24/1982 1982 9 24 116 60 85 72.5 40.5 4717.5
9/25/1982 1982 9 25 117 61 75 68 36 4753.5
9/26/1982 1982 9 26 118 60 89 74.5 42.5 4796
9/27/1982 1982 9 27 119 45 65 55 23 4819
9/28/1982 1982 9 28 120 48 62 55 23 4842
9/29/1982 1982 9 29 121 49 60 54.5 22.5 4864.5
9/30/1982 1982 9 30 122 48 63 55.5 23.5 4888
10/1/1982 1982 10 1 123 42 55 48.5 16.5 4904.5
10/2/1982 1982 10 2 124 40 67 53.5 21.5 4926
10/3/1982 1982 10 3 125 38 70 54 22 4948
10/4/1982 1982 10 4 126 34 78 56 24 4972
10/5/1982 1982 10 5 127 45 63 54 22 4994
10/6/1982 1982 10 6 128 38 65 51.5 19.5 5013.5
10/7/1982 1982 10 7 129 37 68 52.5 20.5 5034
10/8/1982 1982 10 8 130 38 53 45.5 13.5 5047.5
10/9/1982 1982 10 9 131 35 55 45 13 5060.5
10/10/1982 1982 10 10 132 34 60 47 15 5075.5
10/11/1982 1982 10 11 133 30 63 46.5 14.5 5090
10/12/1982 1982 10 12 134 25 65 45 13 5103
10/13/1982 1982 10 13 135 35 70 52.5 20.5 5123.5
10/14/1982 1982 10 14 136 36 69 52.5 20.5 5144
10/15/1982 1982 10 15 137 35 70 52.5 20.5 5164.5
10/16/1982 1982 10 16 138 32 70 51 19 5183.5
10/17/1982 1982 10 17 139 30 73 51.5 19.5 5203
10/18/1982 1982 10 18 140 35 77 56 24 5227
10/19/1982 1982 10 19 141 33 50 41.5 9.5 5236.5
10/20/1982 1982 10 20 142 22 62 42 10 5246.5
10/21/1982 1982 10 21 143 27 65 46 14 5260.5
10/22/1982 1982 10 22 144 32 68 50 18 5278.5
10/23/1982 1982 10 23 145 28 67 47.5 15.5 5294
10/24/1982 1982 10 24 146 35 63 49 17 5311
10/25/1982 1982 10 25 147 54 75 64.5 32.5 5343.5
10/26/1982 1982 10 26 148 52 65 58.5 26.5 5370
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
10/27/1982 1982 10 27 149 38 48 43 11 5381
10/28/1982 1982 10 28 150 24 50 37 5 5386
10/29/1982 1982 10 29 151 20 55 37.5 5.5 5391.5
10/30/1982 1982 10 30 152 34 53 43.5 11.5 5403
10/31/1982 1982 10 31 153 38 66 52 20 5423
11/1/1982 1982 11 1 154 24 60 42 10 5433
11/2/1982 1982 11 2 155 48 48 48 16 5449
11/3/1982 1982 11 3 156 18 54 36 4 5453
11/4/1982 1982 11 4 157 12 50 31 -1 5452
11/5/1982 1982 11 5 158 25 55 40 8 5460
11/6/1982 1982 11 6 159 14 42 28 -4 5456
11/7/1982 1982 11 7 160 22 60 41 9 5465
11/8/1982 1982 11 8 161 43 58 50.5 18.5 5483.5
11/9/1982 1982 11 9 162 43 55 49 17 5500.5
11/10/1982 1982 11 10 163 35 48 41.5 9.5 5510
11/11/1982 1982 11 11 164 35 48 41.5 9.5 5519.5
11/12/1982 1982 11 12 165 19 45 32 0 5519.5
11/13/1982 1982 11 13 166 20 51 35.5 3.5 5523
11/14/1982 1982 11 14 167 12 42 27 -5 5518
11/15/1982 1982 11 15 168 20 43 31.5 -0.5 5517.5
11/16/1982 1982 11 16 169 11 48 29.5 -2.5 5515
11/17/1982 1982 11 17 170 17 45 31 -1 5514
11/18/1982 1982 11 18 171 41 55 48 16 5530
11/19/1982 1982 11 19 172 30 52 41 9 5539
11/20/1982 1982 11 20 173 27 38 32.5 0.5 5539.5
11/21/1982 1982 11 21 174 30 38 34 2 5541.5
11/22/1982 1982 11 22 175 30 40 35 3 5544.5
11/23/1982 1982 11 23 176 19 40 29.5 -2.5 5542
11/24/1982 1982 11 24 177 29 45 37 5 5547
11/25/1982 1982 11 25 178 22 45 33.5 1.5 5548.5
11/26/1982 1982 11 26 179 15 52 33.5 1.5 5550
11/27/1982 1982 11 27 180 22 35 28.5 -3.5 5546.5
11/28/1982 1982 11 28 181 15 49 32 0 5546.5
11/29/1982 1982 11 29 182 30 45 37.5 5.5 5552
11/30/1982 1982 11 30 183 38 47 42.5 10.5 5562.5
12/1/1982 1982 12 1 184 33 40 36.5 4.5 5567
12/2/1982 1982 12 2 185 25 41 33 1 5568
12/3/1982 1982 12 3 186 16 42 29 -3 5565
12/4/1982 1982 12 4 187 15 45 30 -2 5563
12/5/1982 1982 12 5 188 15 45 30 -2 5561
12/6/1982 1982 12 6 189 16 47 31.5 -0.5 5560.5
12/7/1982 1982 12 7 190 20 42 31 -1 5559.5
12/8/1982 1982 12 8 191 26 43 34.5 2.5 5562
12/9/1982 1982 12 9 192 35 40 37.5 5.5 5567.5
12/10/1982 1982 12 10 193 34 46 40 8 5575.5
12/11/1982 1982 12 11 194 22 46 34 2 5577.5
12/12/1982 1982 12 12 195 28 41 34.5 2.5 5580
12/13/1982 1982 12 13 196 28 49 38.5 6.5 5586.5
12/14/1982 1982 12 14 197 20 43 31.5 -0.5 5586
12/15/1982 1982 12 15 198 25 45 35 3 5589
12/16/1982 1982 12 16 199 16 43 29.5 -2.5 5586.5
12/17/1982 1982 12 17 200 14 40 27 -5 5581.5
12/18/1982 1982 12 18 201 11 47 29 -3 5578.5
12/19/1982 1982 12 19 202 10 41 25.5 -6.5 5572
12/20/1982 1982 12 20 203 12 42 27 -5 5567
12/21/1982 1982 12 21 204 12 39 25.5 -6.5 5560.5
12/22/1982 1982 12 22 205 28 48 38 6 5566.5
12/23/1982 1982 12 23 206 32 46 39 7 5573.5
12/24/1982 1982 12 24 207 32 39 35.5 3.5 5577
12/25/1982 1982 12 25 208 11 42 26.5 -5.5 5571.5
12/26/1982 1982 12 26 209 2 35 18.5 -13.5 5558
12/27/1982 1982 12 27 210 3 42 22.5 -9.5 5548.5
12/28/1982 1982 12 28 211 8 27 17.5 -14.5 5534
12/29/1982 1982 12 29 212 -2 25 11.5 -20.5 5513.5
12/30/1982 1982 12 30 213 -4 34 15 -17 5496.5
12/31/1982 1982 12 31 214 18 35 26.5 -5.5 5491
1/1/1983 1983 1 1 215 0 36 18 -14 5477
1/2/1983 1983 1 2 216 0 38 19 -13 5464
1/3/1983 1983 1 3 217 5 36 20.5 -11.5 5452.5
1/4/1983 1983 1 4 218 5 38 21.5 -10.5 5442
1/5/1983 1983 1 5 219 9 39 24 -8 5434
1/6/1983 1983 1 6 220 11 42 26.5 -5.5 5428.5
1/7/1983 1983 1 7 221 17 50 33.5 1.5 5430
1/8/1983 1983 1 8 222 10 43 26.5 -5.5 5424.5
1/9/1983 1983 1 9 223 25 47 36 4 5428.5
1/10/1983 1983 1 10 224 12 39 25.5 -6.5 5422
1/11/1983 1983 1 11 225 7 49 28 -4 5418
1/12/1983 1983 1 12 226 6 46 26 -6 5412
1/13/1983 1983 1 13 227 7 43 25 -7 5405
1/14/1983 1983 1 14 228 7 39 23 -9 5396
1/15/1983 1983 1 15 229 8 45 26.5 -5.5 5390.5
1/16/1983 1983 1 16 230 10 45 27.5 -4.5 5386
1/17/1983 1983 1 17 231 30 36 33 1 5387
1/18/1983 1983 1 18 232 29 47 38 6 5393
1/19/1983 1983 1 19 233 26 37 31.5 -0.5 5392.5
1/20/1983 1983 1 20 234 30 35 32.5 0.5 5393
1/21/1983 1983 1 21 235 28 40 34 2 5395
1/22/1983 1983 1 22 236 16 41 28.5 -3.5 5391.5
1/23/1983 1983 1 23 237 37 45 41 9 5400.5
1/24/1983 1983 1 24 238 35 40 37.5 5.5 5406
1/25/1983 1983 1 25 239 30 45 37.5 5.5 5411.5
1/26/1983 1983 1 26 240 27 36 31.5 -0.5 5411
1/27/1983 1983 1 27 241 30 44 37 5 5416
1/28/1983 1983 1 28 242 28 52 40 8 5424
1/29/1983 1983 1 29 243 28 41 34.5 2.5 5426.5
1/30/1983 1983 1 30 244 19 45 32 0 5426.5
1/31/1983 1983 1 31 245 28 43 35.5 3.5 5430
2/1/1983 1983 2 1 246 19 42 30.5 -1.5 5428.5
2/2/1983 1983 2 2 247 15 39 27 -5 5423.5
2/3/1983 1983 2 3 248 23 38 30.5 -1.5 5422
2/4/1983 1983 2 4 249 27 38 32.5 0.5 5422.5
2/5/1983 1983 2 5 250 16 44 30 -2 5420.5
2/6/1983 1983 2 6 251 25 48 36.5 4.5 5425
2/7/1983 1983 2 7 252 32 58 45 13 5438
2/8/1983 1983 2 8 253 35 54 44.5 12.5 5450.5
2/9/1983 1983 2 9 254 32 61 46.5 14.5 5465
2/10/1983 1983 2 10 255 25 54 39.5 7.5 5472.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
2/11/1983 1983 2 11 256 18 55 36.5 4.5 5477
2/12/1983 1983 2 12 257 22 51 36.5 4.5 5481.5
2/13/1983 1983 2 13 258 26 50 38 6 5487.5
2/14/1983 1983 2 14 259 35 53 44 12 5499.5
2/15/1983 1983 2 15 260 20 54 37 5 5504.5
2/16/1983 1983 2 16 261 22 54 38 6 5510.5
2/17/1983 1983 2 17 262 22 55 38.5 6.5 5517
2/18/1983 1983 2 18 263 25 62 43.5 11.5 5528.5
2/19/1983 1983 2 19 264 32 51 41.5 9.5 5538
2/20/1983 1983 2 20 265 18 55 36.5 4.5 5542.5
2/21/1983 1983 2 21 266 18 57 37.5 5.5 5548
2/22/1983 1983 2 22 267 17 57 37 5 5553
2/23/1983 1983 2 23 268 21 61 41 9 5562
2/24/1983 1983 2 24 269 18 61 39.5 7.5 5569.5
2/25/1983 1983 2 25 270 35 60 47.5 15.5 5585
2/26/1983 1983 2 26 271 33 51 42 10 5595
2/27/1983 1983 2 27 272 25 53 39 7 5602
2/28/1983 1983 2 28 273 43 61 52 20 5622
3/1/1983 1983 3 1 274 47 60 53.5 21.5 5643.5
3/2/1983 1983 3 2 275 40 58 49 17 5660.5
3/3/1983 1983 3 3 276 38 60 49 17 5677.5
3/4/1983 1983 3 4 277 38 46 42 10 5687.5
3/5/1983 1983 3 5 278 45 54 49.5 17.5 5705
3/6/1983 1983 3 6 279 29 60 44.5 12.5 5717.5
3/7/1983 1983 3 7 280 31 57 44 12 5729.5
3/8/1983 1983 3 8 281 30 64 47 15 5744.5
3/9/1983 1983 3 9 282 28 63 45.5 13.5 5758
3/10/1983 1983 3 10 283 31 67 49 17 5775
3/11/1983 1983 3 11 284 33 65 49 17 5792
3/12/1983 1983 3 12 285 35 72 53.5 21.5 5813.5
3/13/1983 1983 3 13 286 35 70 52.5 20.5 5834
3/14/1983 1983 3 14 287 43 59 51 19 5853
3/15/1983 1983 3 15 288 35 51 43 11 5864
3/16/1983 1983 3 16 289 32 54 43 11 5875
3/17/1983 1983 3 17 290 40 55 47.5 15.5 5890.5
3/18/1983 1983 3 18 291 37 50 43.5 11.5 5902
3/19/1983 1983 3 19 292 34 53 43.5 11.5 5913.5
3/20/1983 1983 3 20 293 34 50 42 10 5923.5
3/21/1983 1983 3 21 294 30 44 37 5 5928.5
3/22/1983 1983 3 22 295 45 59 52 20 5948.5
3/23/1983 1983 3 23 296 34 53 43.5 11.5 5960
3/24/1983 1983 3 24 297 32 52 42 10 5970
3/25/1983 1983 3 25 298 34 52 43 11 5981
3/26/1983 1983 3 26 299 32 55 43.5 11.5 5992.5
3/27/1983 1983 3 27 300 28 58 43 11 6003.5
3/28/1983 1983 3 28 301 40 48 44 12 6015.5
3/29/1983 1983 3 29 302 35 58 46.5 14.5 6030
3/30/1983 1983 3 30 303 39 71 55 23 6053
3/31/1983 1983 3 31 304 42 68 55 23 6076
4/1/1983 1983 4 1 305 43 57 50 18 6094
4/2/1983 1983 4 2 306 35 62 48.5 16.5 6110.5
4/3/1983 1983 4 3 307 33 50 41.5 9.5 6120
4/4/1983 1983 4 4 308 29 40 34.5 2.5 6122.5
4/5/1983 1983 4 5 309 27 42 34.5 2.5 6125
4/6/1983 1983 4 6 310 26 51 38.5 6.5 6131.5
4/7/1983 1983 4 7 311 29 53 41 9 6140.5
4/8/1983 1983 4 8 312 35 59 47 15 6155.5
4/9/1983 1983 4 9 313 35 70 52.5 20.5 6176
4/10/1983 1983 4 10 314 49 67 58 26 6202
4/11/1983 1983 4 11 315 44 54 49 17 6219
4/12/1983 1983 4 12 316 40 50 45 13 6232
4/13/1983 1983 4 13 317 39 50 44.5 12.5 6244.5
4/14/1983 1983 4 14 318 37 52 44.5 12.5 6257
4/15/1983 1983 4 15 319 48 58 53 21 6278
4/16/1983 1983 4 16 320 35 63 49 17 6295
4/17/1983 1983 4 17 321 39 71 55 23 6318
4/18/1983 1983 4 18 322 47 68 57.5 25.5 6343.5
4/19/1983 1983 4 19 323 45 70 57.5 25.5 6369
4/20/1983 1983 4 20 324 52 67 59.5 27.5 6396.5
4/21/1983 1983 4 21 325 43 62 52.5 20.5 6417
4/22/1983 1983 4 22 326 46 73 59.5 27.5 6444.5
4/23/1983 1983 4 23 327 50 74 62 30 6474.5
4/24/1983 1983 4 24 328 60 79 69.5 37.5 6512
4/25/1983 1983 4 25 329 50 75 62.5 30.5 6542.5
4/26/1983 1983 4 26 330 58 65 61.5 29.5 6572
4/27/1983 1983 4 27 331 54 66 60 28 6600
4/28/1983 1983 4 28 332 50 77 63.5 31.5 6631.5
4/29/1983 1983 4 29 333 52 69 60.5 28.5 6660
4/30/1983 1983 4 30 334 49 61 55 23 6683
5/1/1983 1983 5 1 335 42 61 51.5 19.5 6702.5
5/2/1983 1983 5 2 336 43 65 54 22 6724.5
5/3/1983 1983 5 3 337 52 74 63 31 6755.5
5/4/1983 1983 5 4 338 50 76 63 31 6786.5
5/5/1983 1983 5 5 339 55 73 64 32 6818.5
5/6/1983 1983 5 6 340 48 61 54.5 22.5 6841
5/7/1983 1983 5 7 341 45 71 58 26 6867
5/8/1983 1983 5 8 342 40 84 62 30 6897
5/9/1983 1983 5 9 343 63 77 70 38 6935
5/10/1983 1983 5 10 344 51 80 65.5 33.5 6968.5
5/11/1983 1983 5 11 345 40 59 49.5 17.5 6986
5/12/1983 1983 5 12 346 43 67 55 23 7009
5/13/1983 1983 5 13 347 48 68 58 26 7035
5/14/1983 1983 5 14 348 48 65 56.5 24.5 7059.5
5/15/1983 1983 5 15 349 40 70 55 23 7082.5
5/16/1983 1983 5 16 350 40 53 46.5 14.5 7097
5/17/1983 1983 5 17 351 42 63 52.5 20.5 7117.5
5/18/1983 1983 5 18 352 48 65 56.5 24.5 7142
5/19/1983 1983 5 19 353 52 63 57.5 25.5 7167.5
5/20/1983 1983 5 20 354 55 70 62.5 30.5 7198
5/21/1983 1983 5 21 355 58 84 71 39 7237
5/22/1983 1983 5 22 356 58 81 69.5 37.5 7274.5
5/23/1983 1983 5 23 357 58 87 72.5 40.5 7315
5/24/1983 1983 5 24 358 64 90 77 45 7360
5/25/1983 1983 5 25 359 71 89 80 48 7408
5/26/1983 1983 5 26 360 67 90 78.5 46.5 7454.5
5/27/1983 1983 5 27 361 68 95 81.5 49.5 7504
5/28/1983 1983 5 28 362 66 95 80.5 48.5 7552.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
5/29/1983 1983 5 29 363 70 88 79 47 7599.5
5/30/1983 1983 5 30 364 68 87 77.5 45.5 7645
5/31/1983 1983 5 31 365 60 75 67.5 35.5 7680.5
6/1/1983 1983 6 1 1 65 86 75.5 43.5 43.5
6/2/1983 1983 6 2 2 64 77 70.5 38.5 82
6/3/1983 1983 6 3 3 59 80 69.5 37.5 119.5
6/4/1983 1983 6 4 4 59 75 67 35 154.5
6/5/1983 1983 6 5 5 63 80 71.5 39.5 194
6/6/1983 1983 6 6 6 67 87 77 45 239
6/7/1983 1983 6 7 7 65 82 73.5 41.5 280.5
6/8/1983 1983 6 8 8 64 85 74.5 42.5 323
6/9/1983 1983 6 9 9 65 79 72 40 363
6/10/1983 1983 6 10 10 62 90 76 44 407
6/11/1983 1983 6 11 11 63 91 77 45 452
6/12/1983 1983 6 12 12 50 70 60 28 480
6/13/1983 1983 6 13 13 55 70 62.5 30.5 510.5
6/14/1983 1983 6 14 14 60 77 68.5 36.5 547
6/15/1983 1983 6 15 15 62 87 74.5 42.5 589.5
6/16/1983 1983 6 16 16 68 91 79.5 47.5 637
6/17/1983 1983 6 17 17 70 90 80 48 685
6/18/1983 1983 6 18 18 82 100 91 59 744
6/19/1983 1983 6 19 19 82 97 89.5 57.5 801.5
6/20/1983 1983 6 20 20 63 95 79 47 848.5
6/21/1983 1983 6 21 21 70 95 82.5 50.5 899
6/22/1983 1983 6 22 22 75 93 84 52 951
6/23/1983 1983 6 23 23 64 93 78.5 46.5 997.5
6/24/1983 1983 6 24 24 65 84 74.5 42.5 1040
6/25/1983 1983 6 25 25 59 80 69.5 37.5 1077.5
6/26/1983 1983 6 26 26 67 84 75.5 43.5 1121
6/27/1983 1983 6 27 27 70 92 81 49 1170
6/28/1983 1983 6 28 28 69 95 82 50 1220
6/29/1983 1983 6 29 29 72 97 84.5 52.5 1272.5
6/30/1983 1983 6 30 30 68 94 81 49 1321.5
7/1/1983 1983 7 1 31 70 95 82.5 50.5 1372
7/2/1983 1983 7 2 32 80 93 86.5 54.5 1426.5
7/3/1983 1983 7 3 33 72 89 80.5 48.5 1475
7/4/1983 1983 7 4 34 67 92 79.5 47.5 1522.5
7/5/1983 1983 7 5 35 55 104 79.5 47.5 1570
7/6/1983 1983 7 6 36 72 98 85 53 1623
7/7/1983 1983 7 7 37 65 85 75 43 1666
7/8/1983 1983 7 8 38 71 94 82.5 50.5 1716.5
7/9/1983 1983 7 9 39 63 85 74 42 1758.5
7/10/1983 1983 7 10 40 69 87 78 46 1804.5
7/11/1983 1983 7 11 41 66 89 77.5 45.5 1850
7/12/1983 1983 7 12 42 62 95 78.5 46.5 1896.5
7/13/1983 1983 7 13 43 74 100 87 55 1951.5
7/14/1983 1983 7 14 44 59 98 78.5 46.5 1998
7/15/1983 1983 7 15 45 85 90 87.5 55.5 2053.5
7/16/1983 1983 7 16 46 85 96 90.5 58.5 2112
7/17/1983 1983 7 17 47 79 98 88.5 56.5 2168.5
7/18/1983 1983 7 18 48 85 102 93.5 61.5 2230
7/19/1983 1983 7 19 49 73 99 86 54 2284
7/20/1983 1983 7 20 50 82 90 86 54 2338
7/21/1983 1983 7 21 51 67 80 73.5 41.5 2379.5
7/22/1983 1983 7 22 52 65 77 71 39 2418.5
7/23/1983 1983 7 23 53 69 80 74.5 42.5 2461
7/24/1983 1983 7 24 54 70 99 84.5 52.5 2513.5
7/25/1983 1983 7 25 55 73 87 80 48 2561.5
7/26/1983 1983 7 26 56 74 93 83.5 51.5 2613
7/27/1983 1983 7 27 57 63 85 74 42 2655
7/28/1983 1983 7 28 58 65 92 78.5 46.5 2701.5
7/29/1983 1983 7 29 59 73 98 85.5 53.5 2755
7/30/1983 1983 7 30 60 72 98 85 53 2808
7/31/1983 1983 7 31 61 68 89 78.5 46.5 2854.5
8/1/1983 1983 8 1 62 70 92 81 49 2903.5
8/2/1983 1983 8 2 63 72 95 83.5 51.5 2955
8/3/1983 1983 8 3 64 68 95 81.5 49.5 3004.5
8/4/1983 1983 8 4 65 67 90 78.5 46.5 3051
8/5/1983 1983 8 5 66 72 94 83 51 3102
8/6/1983 1983 8 6 67 72 102 87 55 3157
8/8/1983 1983 8 8 69 86 95 90.5 58.5 3215.5
8/9/1983 1983 8 9 70 77 96 86.5 54.5 3270
8/10/1983 1983 8 10 71 73 93 83 51 3321
8/11/1983 1983 8 11 72 70 80 75 43 3364
8/12/1983 1983 8 12 73 69 87 78 46 3410
8/13/1983 1983 8 13 74 69 95 82 50 3460
8/14/1983 1983 8 14 75 65 93 79 47 3507
8/15/1983 1983 8 15 76 72 90 81 49 3556
8/16/1983 1983 8 16 77 72 90 81 49 3605
8/17/1983 1983 8 17 78 65 94 79.5 47.5 3652.5
8/18/1983 1983 8 18 79 73 90 81.5 49.5 3702
8/19/1983 1983 8 19 80 72 86 79 47 3749
8/20/1983 1983 8 20 81 65 80 72.5 40.5 3789.5
8/21/1983 1983 8 21 82 68 93 80.5 48.5 3838
8/22/1983 1983 8 22 83 63 90 76.5 44.5 3882.5
8/23/1983 1983 8 23 84 62 90 76 44 3926.5
8/24/1983 1983 8 24 85 62 92 77 45 3971.5
8/25/1983 1983 8 25 86 63 90 76.5 44.5 4016
8/26/1983 1983 8 26 87 58 92 75 43 4059
8/27/1983 1983 8 27 88 63 95 79 47 4106
8/28/1983 1983 8 28 89 65 93 79 47 4153
8/29/1983 1983 8 29 90 64 89 76.5 44.5 4197.5
8/30/1983 1983 8 30 91 65 94 79.5 47.5 4245
8/31/1983 1983 8 31 92 65 93 79 47 4292
9/1/1983 1983 9 1 93 62 95 78.5 46.5 4338.5
9/2/1983 1983 9 2 94 72 95 83.5 51.5 4390
9/3/1983 1983 9 3 95 64 96 80 48 4438
9/4/1983 1983 9 4 96 63 92 77.5 45.5 4483.5
9/5/1983 1983 9 5 97 60 90 75 43 4526.5
9/6/1983 1983 9 6 98 57 93 75 43 4569.5
9/7/1983 1983 9 7 99 59 92 75.5 43.5 4613
9/8/1983 1983 9 8 100 66 85 75.5 43.5 4656.5
9/9/1983 1983 9 9 101 66 92 79 47 4703.5
9/10/1983 1983 9 10 102 62 90 76 44 4747.5
9/11/1983 1983 9 11 103 54 92 73 41 4788.5
9/12/1983 1983 9 12 104 48 92 70 38 4826.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
9/13/1983 1983 9 13 105 55 90 72.5 40.5 4867
9/14/1983 1983 9 14 106 62 88 75 43 4910
9/15/1983 1983 9 15 107 54 92 73 41 4951
9/16/1983 1983 9 16 108 55 97 76 44 4995
9/17/1983 1983 9 17 109 62 92 77 45 5040
9/18/1983 1983 9 18 110 60 95 77.5 45.5 5085.5
9/19/1983 1983 9 19 111 57 82 69.5 37.5 5123
9/20/1983 1983 9 20 112 43 64 53.5 21.5 5144.5
9/21/1983 1983 9 21 113 38 75 56.5 24.5 5169
9/22/1983 1983 9 22 114 45 77 61 29 5198
9/23/1983 1983 9 23 115 62 72 67 35 5233
9/24/1983 1983 9 24 116 55 73 64 32 5265
9/25/1983 1983 9 25 117 53 78 65.5 33.5 5298.5
9/26/1983 1983 9 26 118 51 78 64.5 32.5 5331
9/27/1983 1983 9 27 119 58 78 68 36 5367
9/28/1983 1983 9 28 120 52 82 67 35 5402
9/29/1983 1983 9 29 121 55 72 63.5 31.5 5433.5
9/30/1983 1983 9 30 122 50 70 60 28 5461.5
10/1/1983 1983 10 1 123 48 68 58 26 5487.5
10/2/1983 1983 10 2 124 50 68 59 27 5514.5
10/3/1983 1983 10 3 125 45 70 57.5 25.5 5540
10/4/1983 1983 10 4 126 45 72 58.5 26.5 5566.5
10/5/1983 1983 10 5 127 45 74 59.5 27.5 5594
10/6/1983 1983 10 6 128 50 76 63 31 5625
10/7/1983 1983 10 7 129 45 73 59 27 5652
10/8/1983 1983 10 8 130 49 77 63 31 5683
10/9/1983 1983 10 9 131 50 82 66 34 5717
10/10/1983 1983 10 10 132 58 79 68.5 36.5 5753.5
10/11/1983 1983 10 11 133 44 70 57 25 5778.5
10/12/1983 1983 10 12 134 42 74 58 26 5804.5
10/13/1983 1983 10 13 135 42 77 59.5 27.5 5832
10/14/1983 1983 10 14 136 50 64 57 25 5857
10/15/1983 1983 10 15 137 37 68 52.5 20.5 5877.5
10/16/1983 1983 10 16 138 35 69 52 20 5897.5
10/17/1983 1983 10 17 139 35 70 52.5 20.5 5918
10/18/1983 1983 10 18 140 42 73 57.5 25.5 5943.5
10/19/1983 1983 10 19 141 35 65 50 18 5961.5
10/20/1983 1983 10 20 142 32 70 51 19 5980.5
10/21/1983 1983 10 21 143 27 72 49.5 17.5 5998
10/22/1983 1983 10 22 144 30 73 51.5 19.5 6017.5
10/23/1983 1983 10 23 145 30 74 52 20 6037.5
10/24/1983 1983 10 24 146 41 67 54 22 6059.5
10/25/1983 1983 10 25 147 30 68 49 17 6076.5
10/26/1983 1983 10 26 148 32 70 51 19 6095.5
10/27/1983 1983 10 27 149 30 70 50 18 6113.5
10/28/1983 1983 10 28 150 35 54 44.5 12.5 6126
10/29/1983 1983 10 29 151 32 70 51 19 6145
10/30/1983 1983 10 30 152 35 70 52.5 20.5 6165.5
10/31/1983 1983 10 31 153 52 72 62 30 6195.5
11/1/1983 1983 11 1 154 38 70 54 22 6217.5
11/2/1983 1983 11 2 155 48 63 55.5 23.5 6241
11/3/1983 1983 11 3 156 33 67 50 18 6259
11/4/1983 1983 11 4 157 29 68 48.5 16.5 6275.5
11/5/1983 1983 11 5 158 32 65 48.5 16.5 6292
11/6/1983 1983 11 6 159 30 69 49.5 17.5 6309.5
11/7/1983 1983 11 7 160 32 72 52 20 6329.5
11/8/1983 1983 11 8 161 35 47 41 9 6338.5
11/9/1983 1983 11 9 162 15 47 31 -1 6337.5
11/10/1983 1983 11 10 163 30 52 41 9 6346.5
11/11/1983 1983 11 11 164 28 60 44 12 6358.5
11/12/1983 1983 11 12 165 34 60 47 15 6373.5
11/13/1983 1983 11 13 166 55 63 59 27 6400.5
11/14/1983 1983 11 14 167 27 54 40.5 8.5 6409
11/15/1983 1983 11 15 168 20 50 35 3 6412
11/16/1983 1983 11 16 169 15 57 36 4 6416
11/17/1983 1983 11 17 170 19 49 34 2 6418
11/18/1983 1983 11 18 171 30 50 40 8 6426
11/19/1983 1983 11 19 172 24 47 35.5 3.5 6429.5
11/20/1983 1983 11 20 173 47 52 49.5 17.5 6447
11/21/1983 1983 11 21 174 25 43 34 2 6449
11/22/1983 1983 11 22 175 20 43 31.5 -0.5 6448.5
11/23/1983 1983 11 23 176 20 42 31 -1 6447.5
11/24/1983 1983 11 24 177 22 41 31.5 -0.5 6447
11/25/1983 1983 11 25 178 35 48 41.5 9.5 6456.5
11/26/1983 1983 11 26 179 27 40 33.5 1.5 6458
11/27/1983 1983 11 27 180 15 45 30 -2 6456
11/28/1983 1983 11 28 181 25 44 34.5 2.5 6458.5
11/29/1983 1983 11 29 182 25 45 35 3 6461.5
11/30/1983 1983 11 30 183 15 40 27.5 -4.5 6457
12/1/1983 1983 12 1 184 25 38 31.5 -0.5 6456.5
12/2/1983 1983 12 2 185 23 40 31.5 -0.5 6456
12/3/1983 1983 12 3 186 27 45 36 4 6460
12/4/1983 1983 12 4 187 28 45 36.5 4.5 6464.5
12/5/1983 1983 12 5 188 19 35 27 -5 6459.5
12/6/1983 1983 12 6 189 19 39 29 -3 6456.5
12/7/1983 1983 12 7 190 11 42 26.5 -5.5 6451
12/8/1983 1983 12 8 191 20 40 30 -2 6449
12/9/1983 1983 12 9 192 25 37 31 -1 6448
12/10/1983 1983 12 10 193 15 49 32 0 6448
12/11/1983 1983 12 11 194 22 43 32.5 0.5 6448.5
12/12/1983 1983 12 12 195 22 47 34.5 2.5 6451
12/13/1983 1983 12 13 196 25 49 37 5 6456
12/14/1983 1983 12 14 197 22 50 36 4 6460
12/15/1983 1983 12 15 198 29 48 38.5 6.5 6466.5
12/16/1983 1983 12 16 199 12 39 25.5 -6.5 6460
12/17/1983 1983 12 17 200 22 39 30.5 -1.5 6458.5
12/18/1983 1983 12 18 201 10 40 25 -7 6451.5
12/19/1983 1983 12 19 202 22 43 32.5 0.5 6452
12/20/1983 1983 12 20 203 25 33 29 -3 6449
12/21/1983 1983 12 21 204 6 31 18.5 -13.5 6435.5
12/22/1983 1983 12 22 205 0 29 14.5 -17.5 6418
12/23/1983 1983 12 23 206 18 41 29.5 -2.5 6415.5
12/24/1983 1983 12 24 207 25 32 28.5 -3.5 6412
12/25/1983 1983 12 25 208 25 32 28.5 -3.5 6408.5
12/26/1983 1983 12 26 209 28 38 33 1 6409.5
12/27/1983 1983 12 27 210 31 39 35 3 6412.5
12/28/1983 1983 12 28 211 20 34 27 -5 6407.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
12/29/1983 1983 12 29 212 17 26 21.5 -10.5 6397
12/30/1983 1983 12 30 213 15 35 25 -7 6390
12/31/1983 1983 12 31 214 23 41 32 0 6390
1/1/1984 1984 1 1 215 13 38 25.5 -6.5 6383.5
1/2/1984 1984 1 2 216 9 38 23.5 -8.5 6375
1/3/1984 1984 1 3 217 9 35 22 -10 6365
1/4/1984 1984 1 4 218 12 38 25 -7 6358
1/5/1984 1984 1 5 219 14 44 29 -3 6355
1/6/1984 1984 1 6 220 14 46 30 -2 6353
1/7/1984 1984 1 7 221 16 47 31.5 -0.5 6352.5
1/8/1984 1984 1 8 222 15 45 30 -2 6350.5
1/9/1984 1984 1 9 223 15 49 32 0 6350.5
1/10/1984 1984 1 10 224 12 42 27 -5 6345.5
1/11/1984 1984 1 11 225 22 43 32.5 0.5 6346
1/12/1984 1984 1 12 226 11 39 25 -7 6339
1/13/1984 1984 1 13 227 20 26 23 -9 6330
1/14/1984 1984 1 14 228 15 40 27.5 -4.5 6325.5
1/15/1984 1984 1 15 229 9 31 20 -12 6313.5
1/16/1984 1984 1 16 230 -3 29 13 -19 6294.5
1/17/1984 1984 1 17 231 0 28 14 -18 6276.5
1/18/1984 1984 1 18 232 -9 25 8 -24 6252.5
1/19/1984 1984 1 19 233 -4 18 7 -25 6227.5
1/20/1984 1984 1 20 234 0 25 12.5 -19.5 6208
1/21/1984 1984 1 21 235 -5 20 7.5 -24.5 6183.5
1/22/1984 1984 1 22 236 0 30 15 -17 6166.5
1/23/1984 1984 1 23 237 11 37 24 -8 6158.5
1/24/1984 1984 1 24 238 8 33 20.5 -11.5 6147
1/25/1984 1984 1 25 239 11 37 24 -8 6139
1/26/1984 1984 1 26 240 22 45 33.5 1.5 6140.5
1/27/1984 1984 1 27 241 9 45 27 -5 6135.5
1/28/1984 1984 1 28 242 12 43 27.5 -4.5 6131
1/29/1984 1984 1 29 243 10 42 26 -6 6125
1/30/1984 1984 1 30 244 10 43 26.5 -5.5 6119.5
1/31/1984 1984 1 31 245 9 47 28 -4 6115.5
2/1/1984 1984 2 1 246 12 30 21 -11 6104.5
2/2/1984 1984 2 2 247 10 48 29 -3 6101.5
2/3/1984 1984 2 3 248 10 47 28.5 -3.5 6098
2/4/1984 1984 2 4 249 10 50 30 -2 6096
2/5/1984 1984 2 5 250 12 48 30 -2 6094
2/6/1984 1984 2 6 251 10 47 28.5 -3.5 6090.5
2/7/1984 1984 2 7 252 12 51 31.5 -0.5 6090
2/8/1984 1984 2 8 253 12 48 30 -2 6088
2/9/1984 1984 2 9 254 12 45 28.5 -3.5 6084.5
2/10/1984 1984 2 10 255 18 48 33 1 6085.5
2/11/1984 1984 2 11 256 20 45 32.5 0.5 6086
2/12/1984 1984 2 12 257 10 47 28.5 -3.5 6082.5
2/13/1984 1984 2 13 258 22 47 34.5 2.5 6085
2/14/1984 1984 2 14 259 32 43 37.5 5.5 6090.5
2/15/1984 1984 2 15 260 10 45 27.5 -4.5 6086
2/16/1984 1984 2 16 261 15 43 29 -3 6083
2/17/1984 1984 2 17 262 28 39 33.5 1.5 6084.5
2/18/1984 1984 2 18 263 18 42 30 -2 6082.5
2/19/1984 1984 2 19 264 14 40 27 -5 6077.5
2/20/1984 1984 2 20 265 12 42 27 -5 6072.5
2/21/1984 1984 2 21 266 10 41 25.5 -6.5 6066
2/22/1984 1984 2 22 267 18 46 32 0 6066
2/23/1984 1984 2 23 268 10 42 26 -6 6060
2/24/1984 1984 2 24 269 15 42 28.5 -3.5 6056.5
2/25/1984 1984 2 25 270 15 47 31 -1 6055.5
2/26/1984 1984 2 26 271 11 45 28 -4 6051.5
2/27/1984 1984 2 27 272 10 45 27.5 -4.5 6047
2/28/1984 1984 2 28 273 12 48 30 -2 6045
2/29/1984 1984 2 29 274 12 53 32.5 0.5 6045.5
3/1/1984 1984 3 1 275 20 52 36 4 6049.5
3/2/1984 1984 3 2 276 42 57 49.5 17.5 6067
3/3/1984 1984 3 3 277 30 53 41.5 9.5 6076.5
3/4/1984 1984 3 4 278 25 43 34 2 6078.5
3/5/1984 1984 3 5 279 9 45 27 -5 6073.5
3/6/1984 1984 3 6 280 11 52 31.5 -0.5 6073
3/7/1984 1984 3 7 281 17 57 37 5 6078
3/8/1984 1984 3 8 282 20 60 40 8 6086
3/9/1984 1984 3 9 283 20 64 42 10 6096
3/10/1984 1984 3 10 284 26 63 44.5 12.5 6108.5
3/11/1984 1984 3 11 285 38 57 47.5 15.5 6124
3/12/1984 1984 3 12 286 25 61 43 11 6135
3/13/1984 1984 3 13 287 27 65 46 14 6149
3/14/1984 1984 3 14 288 41 60 50.5 18.5 6167.5
3/15/1984 1984 3 15 289 29 64 46.5 14.5 6182
3/16/1984 1984 3 16 290 35 61 48 16 6198
3/17/1984 1984 3 17 291 28 58 43 11 6209
3/18/1984 1984 3 18 292 38 57 47.5 15.5 6224.5
3/19/1984 1984 3 19 293 27 58 42.5 10.5 6235
3/20/1984 1984 3 20 294 35 63 49 17 6252
3/21/1984 1984 3 21 295 30 71 50.5 18.5 6270.5
3/22/1984 1984 3 22 296 38 53 45.5 13.5 6284
3/23/1984 1984 3 23 297 35 58 46.5 14.5 6298.5
3/24/1984 1984 3 24 298 29 62 45.5 13.5 6312
3/25/1984 1984 3 25 299 40 52 46 14 6326
3/26/1984 1984 3 26 300 39 50 44.5 12.5 6338.5
3/27/1984 1984 3 27 301 42 50 46 14 6352.5
3/28/1984 1984 3 28 302 28 56 42 10 6362.5
3/29/1984 1984 3 29 303 37 56 46.5 14.5 6377
3/30/1984 1984 3 30 304 40 53 46.5 14.5 6391.5
3/31/1984 1984 3 31 305 47 60 53.5 21.5 6413
4/1/1984 1984 4 1 306 38 50 44 12 6425
4/2/1984 1984 4 2 307 36 52 44 12 6437
4/3/1984 1984 4 3 308 35 55 45 13 6450
4/4/1984 1984 4 4 309 32 62 47 15 6465
4/5/1984 1984 4 5 310 40 73 56.5 24.5 6489.5
4/6/1984 1984 4 6 311 49 65 57 25 6514.5
4/7/1984 1984 4 7 312 45 68 56.5 24.5 6539
4/8/1984 1984 4 8 313 39 77 58 26 6565
4/9/1984 1984 4 9 314 39 56 47.5 15.5 6580.5
4/10/1984 1984 4 10 315 38 70 54 22 6602.5
4/11/1984 1984 4 11 316 39 54 46.5 14.5 6617
4/12/1984 1984 4 12 317 39 70 54.5 22.5 6639.5
4/13/1984 1984 4 13 318 47 73 60 28 6667.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
4/14/1984 1984 4 14 319 30 68 49 17 6684.5
4/15/1984 1984 4 15 320 44 75 59.5 27.5 6712
4/16/1984 1984 4 16 321 49 83 66 34 6746
4/17/1984 1984 4 17 322 35 83 59 27 6773
4/18/1984 1984 4 18 323 57 80 68.5 36.5 6809.5
4/19/1984 1984 4 19 324 39 70 54.5 22.5 6832
4/20/1984 1984 4 20 325 41 50 45.5 13.5 6845.5
4/21/1984 1984 4 21 326 47 58 52.5 20.5 6866
4/22/1984 1984 4 22 327 42 66 54 22 6888
4/23/1984 1984 4 23 328 45 76 60.5 28.5 6916.5
4/24/1984 1984 4 24 329 55 80 67.5 35.5 6952
4/25/1984 1984 4 25 330 37 45 41 9 6961
4/26/1984 1984 4 26 331 38 50 44 12 6973
4/27/1984 1984 4 27 332 36 58 47 15 6988
4/28/1984 1984 4 28 333 39 56 47.5 15.5 7003.5
4/29/1984 1984 4 29 334 38 65 51.5 19.5 7023
4/30/1984 1984 4 30 335 43 69 56 24 7047
5/1/1984 1984 5 1 336 39 67 53 21 7068
5/2/1984 1984 5 2 337 50 68 59 27 7095
5/3/1984 1984 5 3 338 38 76 57 25 7120
5/4/1984 1984 5 4 339 45 70 57.5 25.5 7145.5
5/5/1984 1984 5 5 340 47 70 58.5 26.5 7172
5/6/1984 1984 5 6 341 50 65 57.5 25.5 7197.5
5/7/1984 1984 5 7 342 40 63 51.5 19.5 7217
5/8/1984 1984 5 8 343 50 76 63 31 7248
5/9/1984 1984 5 9 344 45 87 66 34 7282
5/10/1984 1984 5 10 345 64 92 78 46 7328
5/11/1984 1984 5 11 346 68 93 80.5 48.5 7376.5
5/12/1984 1984 5 12 347 50 90 70 38 7414.5
5/13/1984 1984 5 13 348 60 96 78 46 7460.5
5/14/1984 1984 5 14 349 58 97 77.5 45.5 7506
5/15/1984 1984 5 15 350 59 86 72.5 40.5 7546.5
5/16/1984 1984 5 16 351 60 84 72 40 7586.5
5/17/1984 1984 5 17 352 70 89 79.5 47.5 7634
5/18/1984 1984 5 18 353 67 75 71 39 7673
5/19/1984 1984 5 19 354 65 90 77.5 45.5 7718.5
5/20/1984 1984 5 20 355 67 98 82.5 50.5 7769
5/21/1984 1984 5 21 356 64 93 78.5 46.5 7815.5
5/22/1984 1984 5 22 357 65 90 77.5 45.5 7861
5/23/1984 1984 5 23 358 70 98 84 52 7913
5/24/1984 1984 5 24 359 71 90 80.5 48.5 7961.5
5/25/1984 1984 5 25 360 55 83 69 37 7998.5
5/26/1984 1984 5 26 361 44 93 68.5 36.5 8035
5/27/1984 1984 5 27 362 57 88 72.5 40.5 8075.5
5/28/1984 1984 5 28 363 47 92 69.5 37.5 8113
5/29/1984 1984 5 29 364 46 100 73 41 8154
5/30/1984 1984 5 30 365 51 98 74.5 42.5 8196.5
5/31/1984 1984 5 31 366 60 81 70.5 38.5 8235
6/1/1984 1984 6 1 1 55 77 66 34 34
6/2/1984 1984 6 2 2 60 83 71.5 39.5 73.5
6/3/1984 1984 6 3 3 69 83 76 44 117.5
6/4/1984 1984 6 4 4 60 81 70.5 38.5 156
6/5/1984 1984 6 5 5 50 68 59 27 183
6/6/1984 1984 6 6 6 47 73 60 28 211
6/7/1984 1984 6 7 7 48 69 58.5 26.5 237.5
6/8/1984 1984 6 8 8 47 54 50.5 18.5 256
6/9/1984 1984 6 9 9 47 68 57.5 25.5 281.5
6/10/1984 1984 6 10 10 55 86 70.5 38.5 320
6/11/1984 1984 6 11 11 59 83 71 39 359
6/12/1984 1984 6 12 12 58 89 73.5 41.5 400.5
6/13/1984 1984 6 13 13 59 93 76 44 444.5
6/14/1984 1984 6 14 14 48 97 72.5 40.5 485
6/15/1984 1984 6 15 15 69 92 80.5 48.5 533.5
6/16/1984 1984 6 16 16 60 90 75 43 576.5
6/17/1984 1984 6 17 17 67 86 76.5 44.5 621
6/18/1984 1984 6 18 18 66 93 79.5 47.5 668.5
6/19/1984 1984 6 19 19 51 92 71.5 39.5 708
6/20/1984 1984 6 20 20 78 92 85 53 761
6/21/1984 1984 6 21 21 68 92 80 48 809
6/22/1984 1984 6 22 22 58 95 76.5 44.5 853.5
6/23/1984 1984 6 23 23 61 95 78 46 899.5
6/24/1984 1984 6 24 24 61 92 76.5 44.5 944
6/25/1984 1984 6 25 25 83 90 86.5 54.5 998.5
6/26/1984 1984 6 26 26 75 92 83.5 51.5 1050
6/27/1984 1984 6 27 27 67 99 83 51 1101
6/28/1984 1984 6 28 28 74 102 88 56 1157
6/29/1984 1984 6 29 29 67 104 85.5 53.5 1210.5
6/30/1984 1984 6 30 30 67 82 74.5 42.5 1253
7/1/1984 1984 7 1 31 68 92 80 48 1301
7/2/1984 1984 7 2 32 68 95 81.5 49.5 1350.5
7/3/1984 1984 7 3 33 62 97 79.5 47.5 1398
7/4/1984 1984 7 4 34 70 98 84 52 1450
7/5/1984 1984 7 5 35 68 99 83.5 51.5 1501.5
7/6/1984 1984 7 6 36 53 103 78 46 1547.5
7/7/1984 1984 7 7 37 74 107 90.5 58.5 1606
7/8/1984 1984 7 8 38 75 100 87.5 55.5 1661.5
7/9/1984 1984 7 9 39 73 92 82.5 50.5 1712
7/10/1984 1984 7 10 40 66 94 80 48 1760
7/11/1984 1984 7 11 41 64 104 84 52 1812
7/12/1984 1984 7 12 42 67 96 81.5 49.5 1861.5
7/13/1984 1984 7 13 43 65 93 79 47 1908.5
7/14/1984 1984 7 14 44 67 84 75.5 43.5 1952
7/15/1984 1984 7 15 45 67 89 78 46 1998
7/16/1984 1984 7 16 46 72 95 83.5 51.5 2049.5
7/17/1984 1984 7 17 47 70 100 85 53 2102.5
7/18/1984 1984 7 18 48 90 100 95 63 2165.5
7/19/1984 1984 7 19 49 62 105 83.5 51.5 2217
7/20/1984 1984 7 20 50 69 105 87 55 2272
7/21/1984 1984 7 21 51 69 97 83 51 2323
7/22/1984 1984 7 22 52 62 92 77 45 2368
7/23/1984 1984 7 23 53 65 86 75.5 43.5 2411.5
7/24/1984 1984 7 24 54 71 93 82 50 2461.5
7/25/1984 1984 7 25 55 64 94 79 47 2508.5
7/26/1984 1984 7 26 56 61 91 76 44 2552.5
7/27/1984 1984 7 27 57 62 90 76 44 2596.5
7/28/1984 1984 7 28 58 70 85 77.5 45.5 2642
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
7/29/1984 1984 7 29 59 65 84 74.5 42.5 2684.5
7/30/1984 1984 7 30 60 59 90 74.5 42.5 2727
7/31/1984 1984 7 31 61 72 89 80.5 48.5 2775.5
8/1/1984 1984 8 1 62 62 93 77.5 45.5 2821
8/2/1984 1984 8 2 63 64 99 81.5 49.5 2870.5
8/3/1984 1984 8 3 64 65 97 81 49 2919.5
8/4/1984 1984 8 4 65 63 100 81.5 49.5 2969
8/5/1984 1984 8 5 66 65 82 73.5 41.5 3010.5
8/6/1984 1984 8 6 67 64 92 78 46 3056.5
8/7/1984 1984 8 7 68 68 91 79.5 47.5 3104
8/8/1984 1984 8 8 69 91 91 91 59 3163
8/9/1984 1984 8 9 70 68 95 81.5 49.5 3212.5
8/10/1984 1984 8 10 71 70 90 80 48 3260.5
8/11/1984 1984 8 11 72 66 101 83.5 51.5 3312
8/12/1984 1984 8 12 73 72 97 84.5 52.5 3364.5
8/13/1984 1984 8 13 74 66 95 80.5 48.5 3413
8/14/1984 1984 8 14 75 69 87 78 46 3459
8/15/1984 1984 8 15 76 66 85 75.5 43.5 3502.5
8/16/1984 1984 8 16 77 65 91 78 46 3548.5
8/17/1984 1984 8 17 78 72 97 84.5 52.5 3601
8/18/1984 1984 8 18 79 72 90 81 49 3650
8/19/1984 1984 8 19 80 64 84 74 42 3692
8/20/1984 1984 8 20 81 57 69 63 31 3723
8/21/1984 1984 8 21 82 58 78 68 36 3759
8/22/1984 1984 8 22 83 70 85 77.5 45.5 3804.5
8/23/1984 1984 8 23 84 63 75 69 37 3841.5
8/24/1984 1984 8 24 85 64 79 71.5 39.5 3881
8/25/1984 1984 8 25 86 62 82 72 40 3921
8/26/1984 1984 8 26 87 78 88 83 51 3972
8/27/1984 1984 8 27 88 65 95 80 48 4020
8/28/1984 1984 8 28 89 68 93 80.5 48.5 4068.5
8/29/1984 1984 8 29 90 65 90 77.5 45.5 4114
8/30/1984 1984 8 30 91 67 96 81.5 49.5 4163.5
8/31/1984 1984 8 31 92 62 88 75 43 4206.5
9/1/1984 1984 9 1 93 65 85 75 43 4249.5
9/2/1984 1984 9 2 94 52 85 68.5 36.5 4286
9/3/1984 1984 9 3 95 45 90 67.5 35.5 4321.5
9/4/1984 1984 9 4 96 45 90 67.5 35.5 4357
9/5/1984 1984 9 5 97 59 100 79.5 47.5 4404.5
9/6/1984 1984 9 6 98 56 92 74 42 4446.5
9/7/1984 1984 9 7 99 62 87 74.5 42.5 4489
9/8/1984 1984 9 8 100 55 70 62.5 30.5 4519.5
9/9/1984 1984 9 9 101 48 95 71.5 39.5 4559
9/10/1984 1984 9 10 102 55 94 74.5 42.5 4601.5
9/11/1984 1984 9 11 103 62 83 72.5 40.5 4642
9/12/1984 1984 9 12 104 69 84 76.5 44.5 4686.5
9/13/1984 1984 9 13 105 49 90 69.5 37.5 4724
9/14/1984 1984 9 14 106 65 90 77.5 45.5 4769.5
9/15/1984 1984 9 15 107 60 90 75 43 4812.5
9/16/1984 1984 9 16 108 65 77 71 39 4851.5
9/17/1984 1984 9 17 109 55 86 70.5 38.5 4890
9/18/1984 1984 9 18 110 55 85 70 38 4928
9/19/1984 1984 9 19 111 58 85 71.5 39.5 4967.5
9/20/1984 1984 9 20 112 53 76 64.5 32.5 5000
9/21/1984 1984 9 21 113 53 80 66.5 34.5 5034.5
9/22/1984 1984 9 22 114 50 80 65 33 5067.5
9/23/1984 1984 9 23 115 69 84 76.5 44.5 5112
9/24/1984 1984 9 24 116 50 84 67 35 5147
9/25/1984 1984 9 25 117 38 63 50.5 18.5 5165.5
9/26/1984 1984 9 26 118 47 68 57.5 25.5 5191
9/27/1984 1984 9 27 119 39 76 57.5 25.5 5216.5
9/28/1984 1984 9 28 120 39 77 58 26 5242.5
9/29/1984 1984 9 29 121 40 68 54 22 5264.5
9/30/1984 1984 9 30 122 39 75 57 25 5289.5
10/1/1984 1984 10 1 123 55 65 60 28 5317.5
10/2/1984 1984 10 2 124 50 63 56.5 24.5 5342
10/3/1984 1984 10 3 125 48 64 56 24 5366
10/4/1984 1984 10 4 126 53 74 63.5 31.5 5397.5
10/5/1984 1984 10 5 127 42 72 57 25 5422.5
10/6/1984 1984 10 6 128 45 77 61 29 5451.5
10/7/1984 1984 10 7 129 39 75 57 25 5476.5
10/8/1984 1984 10 8 130 41 74 57.5 25.5 5502
10/9/1984 1984 10 9 131 39 77 58 26 5528
10/10/1984 1984 10 10 132 41 77 59 27 5555
10/11/1984 1984 10 11 133 43 70 56.5 24.5 5579.5
10/12/1984 1984 10 12 134 45 58 51.5 19.5 5599
10/13/1984 1984 10 13 135 31 67 49 17 5616
10/14/1984 1984 10 14 136 39 65 52 20 5636
10/15/1984 1984 10 15 137 34 45 39.5 7.5 5643.5
10/16/1984 1984 10 16 138 24 49 36.5 4.5 5648
10/17/1984 1984 10 17 139 32 54 43 11 5659
10/18/1984 1984 10 18 140 30 48 39 7 5666
10/19/1984 1984 10 19 141 26 46 36 4 5670
10/20/1984 1984 10 20 142 29 50 39.5 7.5 5677.5
10/21/1984 1984 10 21 143 34 46 40 8 5685.5
10/22/1984 1984 10 22 144 28 47 37.5 5.5 5691
10/23/1984 1984 10 23 145 28 43 35.5 3.5 5694.5
10/24/1984 1984 10 24 146 22 44 33 1 5695.5
10/25/1984 1984 10 25 147 21 51 36 4 5699.5
10/26/1984 1984 10 26 148 24 57 40.5 8.5 5708
10/27/1984 1984 10 27 149 35 52 43.5 11.5 5719.5
10/28/1984 1984 10 28 150 22 58 40 8 5727.5
10/29/1984 1984 10 29 151 28 72 50 18 5745.5
10/30/1984 1984 10 30 152 50 65 57.5 25.5 5771
10/31/1984 1984 10 31 153 32 58 45 13 5784
11/1/1984 1984 11 1 154 31 57 44 12 5796
11/2/1984 1984 11 2 155 22 64 43 11 5807
11/3/1984 1984 11 3 156 50 67 58.5 26.5 5833.5
11/4/1984 1984 11 4 157 30 59 44.5 12.5 5846
11/5/1984 1984 11 5 158 21 57 39 7 5853
11/6/1984 1984 11 6 159 34 47 40.5 8.5 5861.5
11/7/1984 1984 11 7 160 35 65 50 18 5879.5
11/8/1984 1984 11 8 161 34 55 44.5 12.5 5892
11/9/1984 1984 11 9 162 25 49 37 5 5897
11/10/1984 1984 11 10 163 15 45 30 -2 5895
11/11/1984 1984 11 11 164 30 50 40 8 5903
11/12/1984 1984 11 12 165 18 53 35.5 3.5 5906.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
11/13/1984 1984 11 13 166 22 60 41 9 5915.5
11/14/1984 1984 11 14 167 30 54 42 10 5925.5
11/15/1984 1984 11 15 168 18 52 35 3 5928.5
11/16/1984 1984 11 16 169 25 50 37.5 5.5 5934
11/17/1984 1984 11 17 170 25 55 40 8 5942
11/18/1984 1984 11 18 171 15 53 34 2 5944
11/19/1984 1984 11 19 172 14 55 34.5 2.5 5946.5
11/20/1984 1984 11 20 173 10 50 30 -2 5944.5
11/21/1984 1984 11 21 174 12 48 30 -2 5942.5
11/22/1984 1984 11 22 175 21 54 37.5 5.5 5948
11/23/1984 1984 11 23 176 22 53 37.5 5.5 5953.5
11/24/1984 1984 11 24 177 21 52 36.5 4.5 5958
11/25/1984 1984 11 25 178 30 44 37 5 5963
11/26/1984 1984 11 26 179 19 40 29.5 -2.5 5960.5
11/27/1984 1984 11 27 180 5 36 20.5 -11.5 5949
11/28/1984 1984 11 28 181 18 44 31 -1 5948
11/29/1984 1984 11 29 182 10 53 31.5 -0.5 5947.5
11/30/1984 1984 11 30 183 22 51 36.5 4.5 5952
12/1/1984 1984 12 1 184 10 46 28 -4 5948
12/2/1984 1984 12 2 185 8 42 25 -7 5941
12/3/1984 1984 12 3 186 8 39 23.5 -8.5 5932.5
12/4/1984 1984 12 4 187 15 45 30 -2 5930.5
12/5/1984 1984 12 5 188 9 41 25 -7 5923.5
12/6/1984 1984 12 6 189 5 45 25 -7 5916.5
12/7/1984 1984 12 7 190 9 41 25 -7 5909.5
12/8/1984 1984 12 8 191 12 35 23.5 -8.5 5901
12/9/1984 1984 12 9 192 26 37 31.5 -0.5 5900.5
12/10/1984 1984 12 10 193 32 39 35.5 3.5 5904
12/11/1984 1984 12 11 194 30 53 41.5 9.5 5913.5
12/12/1984 1984 12 12 195 27 52 39.5 7.5 5921
12/13/1984 1984 12 13 196 30 35 32.5 0.5 5921.5
12/14/1984 1984 12 14 197 23 40 31.5 -0.5 5921
12/15/1984 1984 12 15 198 25 35 30 -2 5919
12/16/1984 1984 12 16 199 19 38 28.5 -3.5 5915.5
12/17/1984 1984 12 17 200 8 32 20 -12 5903.5
12/18/1984 1984 12 18 201 9 38 23.5 -8.5 5895
12/19/1984 1984 12 19 202 20 40 30 -2 5893
12/20/1984 1984 12 20 203 25 48 36.5 4.5 5897.5
12/21/1984 1984 12 21 204 18 42 30 -2 5895.5
12/22/1984 1984 12 22 205 5 36 20.5 -11.5 5884
12/23/1984 1984 12 23 206 3 35 19 -13 5871
12/24/1984 1984 12 24 207 5 36 20.5 -11.5 5859.5
12/25/1984 1984 12 25 208 8 34 21 -11 5848.5
12/26/1984 1984 12 26 209 27 38 32.5 0.5 5849
12/27/1984 1984 12 27 210 27 40 33.5 1.5 5850.5
12/28/1984 1984 12 28 211 30 50 40 8 5858.5
12/29/1984 1984 12 29 212 20 45 32.5 0.5 5859
12/30/1984 1984 12 30 213 22 42 32 0 5859
12/31/1984 1984 12 31 214 19 41 30 -2 5857
1/1/1985 1985 1 1 215 14 38 26 -6 5851
1/2/1985 1985 1 2 216 6 34 20 -12 5839
1/3/1985 1985 1 3 217 6 38 22 -10 5829
1/4/1985 1985 1 4 218 8 40 24 -8 5821
1/5/1985 1985 1 5 219 6 37 21.5 -10.5 5810.5
1/6/1985 1985 1 6 220 18 40 29 -3 5807.5
1/7/1985 1985 1 7 221 28 35 31.5 -0.5 5807
1/8/1985 1985 1 8 222 28 38 33 1 5808
1/9/1985 1985 1 9 223 29 42 35.5 3.5 5811.5
1/10/1985 1985 1 10 224 25 45 35 3 5814.5
1/11/1985 1985 1 11 225 29 35 32 0 5814.5
1/12/1985 1985 1 12 226 18 35 26.5 -5.5 5809
1/13/1985 1985 1 13 227 16 38 27 -5 5804
1/14/1985 1985 1 14 228 6 38 22 -10 5794
1/15/1985 1985 1 15 229 18 38 28 -4 5790
1/16/1985 1985 1 16 230 20 43 31.5 -0.5 5789.5
1/17/1985 1985 1 17 231 14 40 27 -5 5784.5
1/18/1985 1985 1 18 232 17 40 28.5 -3.5 5781
1/19/1985 1985 1 19 233 24 50 37 5 5786
1/20/1985 1985 1 20 234 15 48 31.5 -0.5 5785.5
1/21/1985 1985 1 21 235 21 43 32 0 5785.5
1/22/1985 1985 1 22 236 15 42 28.5 -3.5 5782
1/23/1985 1985 1 23 237 25 40 32.5 0.5 5782.5
1/24/1985 1985 1 24 238 20 43 31.5 -0.5 5782
1/25/1985 1985 1 25 239 20 42 31 -1 5781
1/26/1985 1985 1 26 240 25 43 34 2 5783
1/27/1985 1985 1 27 241 28 42 35 3 5786
1/28/1985 1985 1 28 242 11 42 26.5 -5.5 5780.5
1/29/1985 1985 1 29 243 25 45 35 3 5783.5
1/30/1985 1985 1 30 244 15 32 23.5 -8.5 5775
1/31/1985 1985 1 31 245 4 21 12.5 -19.5 5755.5
2/1/1985 1985 2 1 246 -7 23 8 -24 5731.5
2/2/1985 1985 2 2 247 11 25 18 -14 5717.5
2/3/1985 1985 2 3 248 5 30 17.5 -14.5 5703
2/4/1985 1985 2 4 249 4 32 18 -14 5689
2/5/1985 1985 2 5 250 -5 33 14 -18 5671
2/6/1985 1985 2 6 251 2 34 18 -14 5657
2/7/1985 1985 2 7 252 0 37 18.5 -13.5 5643.5
2/8/1985 1985 2 8 253 14 48 31 -1 5642.5
2/9/1985 1985 2 9 254 24 50 37 5 5647.5
2/10/1985 1985 2 10 255 0 40 20 -12 5635.5
2/11/1985 1985 2 11 256 5 40 22.5 -9.5 5626
2/12/1985 1985 2 12 257 18 39 28.5 -3.5 5622.5
2/13/1985 1985 2 13 258 18 49 33.5 1.5 5624
2/14/1985 1985 2 14 259 15 50 32.5 0.5 5624.5
2/15/1985 1985 2 15 260 16 37 26.5 -5.5 5619
2/16/1985 1985 2 16 261 18 60 39 7 5626
2/17/1985 1985 2 17 262 20 56 38 6 5632
2/18/1985 1985 2 18 263 25 55 40 8 5640
2/19/1985 1985 2 19 264 17 53 35 3 5643
2/20/1985 1985 2 20 265 31 52 41.5 9.5 5652.5
2/21/1985 1985 2 21 266 35 51 43 11 5663.5
2/22/1985 1985 2 22 267 29 55 42 10 5673.5
2/23/1985 1985 2 23 268 22 50 36 4 5677.5
2/24/1985 1985 2 24 269 17 54 35.5 3.5 5681
2/25/1985 1985 2 25 270 18 60 39 7 5688
2/26/1985 1985 2 26 271 15 45 30 -2 5686
2/27/1985 1985 2 27 272 14 52 33 1 5687
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
2/28/1985 1985 2 28 273 18 60 39 7 5694
3/1/1985 1985 3 1 274 17 61 39 7 5701
3/2/1985 1985 3 2 275 35 60 47.5 15.5 5716.5
3/3/1985 1985 3 3 276 30 40 35 3 5719.5
3/4/1985 1985 3 4 277 11 46 28.5 -3.5 5716
3/5/1985 1985 3 5 278 12 52 32 0 5716
3/6/1985 1985 3 6 279 41 60 50.5 18.5 5734.5
3/7/1985 1985 3 7 280 21 60 40.5 8.5 5743
3/8/1985 1985 3 8 281 22 56 39 7 5750
3/9/1985 1985 3 9 282 35 62 48.5 16.5 5766.5
3/10/1985 1985 3 10 283 40 60 50 18 5784.5
3/11/1985 1985 3 11 284 45 58 51.5 19.5 5804
3/12/1985 1985 3 12 285 42 60 51 19 5823
3/13/1985 1985 3 13 286 31 55 43 11 5834
3/14/1985 1985 3 14 287 23 60 41.5 9.5 5843.5
3/15/1985 1985 3 15 288 42 60 51 19 5862.5
3/16/1985 1985 3 16 289 35 65 50 18 5880.5
3/17/1985 1985 3 17 290 31 61 46 14 5894.5
3/18/1985 1985 3 18 291 35 62 48.5 16.5 5911
3/19/1985 1985 3 19 292 45 64 54.5 22.5 5933.5
3/20/1985 1985 3 20 293 35 65 50 18 5951.5
3/21/1985 1985 3 21 294 30 69 49.5 17.5 5969
3/22/1985 1985 3 22 295 27 52 39.5 7.5 5976.5
3/23/1985 1985 3 23 296 27 68 47.5 15.5 5992
3/24/1985 1985 3 24 297 57 71 64 32 6024
3/25/1985 1985 3 25 298 53 82 67.5 35.5 6059.5
3/26/1985 1985 3 26 299 45 65 55 23 6082.5
3/27/1985 1985 3 27 300 32 60 46 14 6096.5
3/28/1985 1985 3 28 301 29 36 32.5 0.5 6097
3/29/1985 1985 3 29 302 29 34 31.5 -0.5 6096.5
3/30/1985 1985 3 30 303 10 41 25.5 -6.5 6090
3/31/1985 1985 3 31 304 30 53 41.5 9.5 6099.5
4/1/1985 1985 4 1 305 30 64 47 15 6114.5
4/2/1985 1985 4 2 306 42 70 56 24 6138.5
4/3/1985 1985 4 3 307 35 75 55 23 6161.5
4/4/1985 1985 4 4 308 42 64 53 21 6182.5
4/5/1985 1985 4 5 309 45 71 58 26 6208.5
4/6/1985 1985 4 6 310 38 75 56.5 24.5 6233
4/7/1985 1985 4 7 311 45 79 62 30 6263
4/8/1985 1985 4 8 312 41 72 56.5 24.5 6287.5
4/9/1985 1985 4 9 313 52 79 65.5 33.5 6321
4/10/1985 1985 4 10 314 40 75 57.5 25.5 6346.5
4/11/1985 1985 4 11 315 50 83 66.5 34.5 6381
4/12/1985 1985 4 12 316 52 80 66 34 6415
4/13/1985 1985 4 13 317 49 80 64.5 32.5 6447.5
4/14/1985 1985 4 14 318 50 83 66.5 34.5 6482
4/15/1985 1985 4 15 319 60 87 73.5 41.5 6523.5
4/16/1985 1985 4 16 320 65 78 71.5 39.5 6563
4/17/1985 1985 4 17 321 50 83 66.5 34.5 6597.5
4/18/1985 1985 4 18 322 44 63 53.5 21.5 6619
4/19/1985 1985 4 19 323 50 68 59 27 6646
4/20/1985 1985 4 20 324 42 56 49 17 6663
4/21/1985 1985 4 21 325 40 62 51 19 6682
4/22/1985 1985 4 22 326 40 58 49 17 6699
4/23/1985 1985 4 23 327 30 67 48.5 16.5 6715.5
4/24/1985 1985 4 24 328 47 70 58.5 26.5 6742
4/25/1985 1985 4 25 329 39 48 43.5 11.5 6753.5
4/26/1985 1985 4 26 330 37 53 45 13 6766.5
4/27/1985 1985 4 27 331 48 70 59 27 6793.5
4/28/1985 1985 4 28 332 60 77 68.5 36.5 6830
4/29/1985 1985 4 29 333 50 84 67 35 6865
4/30/1985 1985 4 30 334 49 87 68 36 6901
5/1/1985 1985 5 1 335 58 88 73 41 6942
5/2/1985 1985 5 2 336 59 83 71 39 6981
5/3/1985 1985 5 3 337 50 88 69 37 7018
5/4/1985 1985 5 4 338 51 83 67 35 7053
5/5/1985 1985 5 5 339 48 81 64.5 32.5 7085.5
5/6/1985 1985 5 6 340 60 88 74 42 7127.5
5/7/1985 1985 5 7 341 45 90 67.5 35.5 7163
5/8/1985 1985 5 8 342 65 80 72.5 40.5 7203.5
5/9/1985 1985 5 9 343 55 74 64.5 32.5 7236
5/10/1985 1985 5 10 344 52 67 59.5 27.5 7263.5
5/11/1985 1985 5 11 345 52 70 61 29 7292.5
5/12/1985 1985 5 12 346 50 61 55.5 23.5 7316
5/13/1985 1985 5 13 347 50 68 59 27 7343
5/14/1985 1985 5 14 348 50 76 63 31 7374
5/15/1985 1985 5 15 349 60 86 73 41 7415
5/16/1985 1985 5 16 350 65 86 75.5 43.5 7458.5
5/17/1985 1985 5 17 351 61 83 72 40 7498.5
5/18/1985 1985 5 18 352 54 76 65 33 7531.5
5/19/1985 1985 5 19 353 58 80 69 37 7568.5
5/20/1985 1985 5 20 354 65 78 71.5 39.5 7608
5/21/1985 1985 5 21 355 52 69 60.5 28.5 7636.5
5/22/1985 1985 5 22 356 60 80 70 38 7674.5
5/23/1985 1985 5 23 357 60 86 73 41 7715.5
5/24/1985 1985 5 24 358 50 82 66 34 7749.5
5/25/1985 1985 5 25 359 52 87 69.5 37.5 7787
5/26/1985 1985 5 26 360 45 90 67.5 35.5 7822.5
5/27/1985 1985 5 27 361 68 88 78 46 7868.5
5/28/1985 1985 5 28 362 67 88 77.5 45.5 7914
5/29/1985 1985 5 29 363 65 86 75.5 43.5 7957.5
5/30/1985 1985 5 30 364 58 76 67 35 7992.5
5/31/1985 1985 5 31 365 51 76 63.5 31.5 8024
6/1/1985 1985 6 1 1 56 80 68 36 36
6/2/1985 1985 6 2 2 45 85 65 33 69
6/3/1985 1985 6 3 3 64 85 74.5 42.5 111.5
6/4/1985 1985 6 4 4 60 90 75 43 154.5
6/5/1985 1985 6 5 5 51 90 70.5 38.5 193
6/6/1985 1985 6 6 6 53 99 76 44 237
6/7/1985 1985 6 7 7 57 104 80.5 48.5 285.5
6/8/1985 1985 6 8 8 60 105 82.5 50.5 336
6/9/1985 1985 6 9 9 57 105 81 49 385
6/10/1985 1985 6 10 10 65 95 80 48 433
6/11/1985 1985 6 11 11 62 93 77.5 45.5 478.5
6/12/1985 1985 6 12 12 70 95 82.5 50.5 529
6/13/1985 1985 6 13 13 56 90 73 41 570
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
6/14/1985 1985 6 14 14 75 100 87.5 55.5 625.5
6/15/1985 1985 6 15 15 57 100 78.5 46.5 672
6/16/1985 1985 6 16 16 80 100 90 58 730
6/17/1985 1985 6 17 17 58 94 76 44 774
6/18/1985 1985 6 18 18 70 96 83 51 825
6/19/1985 1985 6 19 19 55 103 79 47 872
6/20/1985 1985 6 20 20 57 105 81 49 921
6/21/1985 1985 6 21 21 52 95 73.5 41.5 962.5
6/22/1985 1985 6 22 22 52 106 79 47 1009.5
6/23/1985 1985 6 23 23 52 103 77.5 45.5 1055
6/24/1985 1985 6 24 24 64 86 75 43 1098
6/25/1985 1985 6 25 25 53 77 65 33 1131
6/26/1985 1985 6 26 26 65 75 70 38 1169
6/27/1985 1985 6 27 27 65 85 75 43 1212
6/28/1985 1985 6 28 28 61 93 77 45 1257
6/29/1985 1985 6 29 29 60 92 76 44 1301
6/30/1985 1985 6 30 30 72 84 78 46 1347
7/1/1985 1985 7 1 31 50 95 72.5 40.5 1387.5
7/2/1985 1985 7 2 32 50 102 76 44 1431.5
7/3/1985 1985 7 3 33 77 101 89 57 1488.5
7/4/1985 1985 7 4 34 77 110 93.5 61.5 1550
7/5/1985 1985 7 5 35 73 110 91.5 59.5 1609.5
7/6/1985 1985 7 6 36 59 113 86 54 1663.5
7/7/1985 1985 7 7 37 61 107 84 52 1715.5
7/8/1985 1985 7 8 38 77 102 89.5 57.5 1773
7/9/1985 1985 7 9 39 82 106 94 62 1835
7/10/1985 1985 7 10 40 73 103 88 56 1891
7/11/1985 1985 7 11 41 67 98 82.5 50.5 1941.5
7/12/1985 1985 7 12 42 73 97 85 53 1994.5
7/13/1985 1985 7 13 43 59 83 71 39 2033.5
7/14/1985 1985 7 14 44 60 92 76 44 2077.5
7/15/1985 1985 7 15 45 70 103 86.5 54.5 2132
7/16/1985 1985 7 16 46 70 95 82.5 50.5 2182.5
7/17/1985 1985 7 17 47 66 90 78 46 2228.5
7/18/1985 1985 7 18 48 65 85 75 43 2271.5
7/19/1985 1985 7 19 49 60 78 69 37 2308.5
7/20/1985 1985 7 20 50 63 82 72.5 40.5 2349
7/21/1985 1985 7 21 51 60 76 68 36 2385
7/22/1985 1985 7 22 52 63 78 70.5 38.5 2423.5
7/23/1985 1985 7 23 53 63 85 74 42 2465.5
7/24/1985 1985 7 24 54 58 84 71 39 2504.5
7/25/1985 1985 7 25 55 55 95 75 43 2547.5
7/26/1985 1985 7 26 56 57 95 76 44 2591.5
7/27/1985 1985 7 27 57 65 95 80 48 2639.5
7/28/1985 1985 7 28 58 68 83 75.5 43.5 2683
7/29/1985 1985 7 29 59 70 88 79 47 2730
7/30/1985 1985 7 30 60 62 85 73.5 41.5 2771.5
7/31/1985 1985 7 31 61 68 92 80 48 2819.5
8/1/1985 1985 8 1 62 80 95 87.5 55.5 2875
8/2/1985 1985 8 2 63 67 99 83 51 2926
8/3/1985 1985 8 3 64 70 95 82.5 50.5 2976.5
8/4/1985 1985 8 4 65 53 98 75.5 43.5 3020
8/5/1985 1985 8 5 66 67 92 79.5 47.5 3067.5
8/6/1985 1985 8 6 67 68 96 82 50 3117.5
8/7/1985 1985 8 7 68 53 100 76.5 44.5 3162
8/8/1985 1985 8 8 69 75 100 87.5 55.5 3217.5
8/9/1985 1985 8 9 70 62 87 74.5 42.5 3260
8/10/1985 1985 8 10 71 63 93 78 46 3306
8/11/1985 1985 8 11 72 72 93 82.5 50.5 3356.5
8/12/1985 1985 8 12 73 50 85 67.5 35.5 3392
8/13/1985 1985 8 13 74 52 90 71 39 3431
8/14/1985 1985 8 14 75 62 93 77.5 45.5 3476.5
8/15/1985 1985 8 15 76 75 93 84 52 3528.5
8/16/1985 1985 8 16 77 69 98 83.5 51.5 3580
8/17/1985 1985 8 17 78 65 86 75.5 43.5 3623.5
8/18/1985 1985 8 18 79 59 90 74.5 42.5 3666
8/19/1985 1985 8 19 80 67 92 79.5 47.5 3713.5
8/20/1985 1985 8 20 81 62 96 79 47 3760.5
8/21/1985 1985 8 21 82 72 92 82 50 3810.5
8/22/1985 1985 8 22 83 62 90 76 44 3854.5
8/23/1985 1985 8 23 84 64 93 78.5 46.5 3901
8/24/1985 1985 8 24 85 48 97 72.5 40.5 3941.5
8/25/1985 1985 8 25 86 74 94 84 52 3993.5
8/26/1985 1985 8 26 87 67 103 85 53 4046.5
8/27/1985 1985 8 27 88 67 100 83.5 51.5 4098
8/28/1985 1985 8 28 89 58 91 74.5 42.5 4140.5
8/29/1985 1985 8 29 90 65 100 82.5 50.5 4191
8/30/1985 1985 8 30 91 55 100 77.5 45.5 4236.5
8/31/1985 1985 8 31 92 71 99 85 53 4289.5
9/1/1985 1985 9 1 93 67 85 76 44 4333.5
9/2/1985 1985 9 2 94 74 94 84 52 4385.5
9/3/1985 1985 9 3 95 63 83 73 41 4426.5
9/4/1985 1985 9 4 96 62 84 73 41 4467.5
9/5/1985 1985 9 5 97 65 85 75 43 4510.5
9/6/1985 1985 9 6 98 51 86 68.5 36.5 4547
9/7/1985 1985 9 7 99 55 75 65 33 4580
9/8/1985 1985 9 8 100 54 81 67.5 35.5 4615.5
9/9/1985 1985 9 9 101 56 85 70.5 38.5 4654
9/10/1985 1985 9 10 102 53 78 65.5 33.5 4687.5
9/11/1985 1985 9 11 103 48 65 56.5 24.5 4712
9/12/1985 1985 9 12 104 40 65 52.5 20.5 4732.5
9/13/1985 1985 9 13 105 37 70 53.5 21.5 4754
9/14/1985 1985 9 14 106 48 85 66.5 34.5 4788.5
9/15/1985 1985 9 15 107 65 85 75 43 4831.5
9/16/1985 1985 9 16 108 47 87 67 35 4866.5
9/17/1985 1985 9 17 109 70 82 76 44 4910.5
9/18/1985 1985 9 18 110 52 66 59 27 4937.5
9/19/1985 1985 9 19 111 52 64 58 26 4963.5
9/20/1985 1985 9 20 112 50 64 57 25 4988.5
9/21/1985 1985 9 21 113 37 90 63.5 31.5 5020
9/22/1985 1985 9 22 114 54 72 63 31 5051
9/23/1985 1985 9 23 115 40 78 59 27 5078
9/24/1985 1985 9 24 116 37 83 60 28 5106
9/25/1985 1985 9 25 117 45 75 60 28 5134
9/26/1985 1985 9 26 118 40 76 58 26 5160
9/27/1985 1985 9 27 119 38 85 61.5 29.5 5189.5
9/28/1985 1985 9 28 120 50 64 57 25 5214.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
9/29/1985 1985 9 29 121 34 65 49.5 17.5 5232
9/30/1985 1985 9 30 122 32 68 50 18 5250
10/1/1985 1985 10 1 123 35 72 53.5 21.5 5271.5
10/2/1985 1985 10 2 124 38 76 57 25 5296.5
10/3/1985 1985 10 3 125 45 84 64.5 32.5 5329
10/4/1985 1985 10 4 126 46 72 59 27 5356
10/5/1985 1985 10 5 127 35 77 56 24 5380
10/6/1985 1985 10 6 128 42 75 58.5 26.5 5406.5
10/7/1985 1985 10 7 129 63 77 70 38 5444.5
10/8/1985 1985 10 8 130 43 53 48 16 5460.5
10/9/1985 1985 10 9 131 43 50 46.5 14.5 5475
10/10/1985 1985 10 10 132 47 57 52 20 5495
10/11/1985 1985 10 11 133 48 70 59 27 5522
10/12/1985 1985 10 12 134 39 68 53.5 21.5 5543.5
10/13/1985 1985 10 13 135 42 55 48.5 16.5 5560
10/14/1985 1985 10 14 136 37 59 48 16 5576
10/15/1985 1985 10 15 137 34 61 47.5 15.5 5591.5
10/16/1985 1985 10 16 138 35 65 50 18 5609.5
10/17/1985 1985 10 17 139 37 72 54.5 22.5 5632
10/18/1985 1985 10 18 140 38 72 55 23 5655
10/19/1985 1985 10 19 141 34 70 52 20 5675
10/20/1985 1985 10 20 142 38 72 55 23 5698
10/21/1985 1985 10 21 143 45 76 60.5 28.5 5726.5
10/22/1985 1985 10 22 144 43 61 52 20 5746.5
10/23/1985 1985 10 23 145 32 70 51 19 5765.5
10/24/1985 1985 10 24 146 38 70 54 22 5787.5
10/25/1985 1985 10 25 147 35 70 52.5 20.5 5808
10/26/1985 1985 10 26 148 38 76 57 25 5833
10/27/1985 1985 10 27 149 38 72 55 23 5856
10/28/1985 1985 10 28 150 44 74 59 27 5883
10/29/1985 1985 10 29 151 44 70 57 25 5908
10/30/1985 1985 10 30 152 38 72 55 23 5931
10/31/1985 1985 10 31 153 49 62 55.5 23.5 5954.5
11/1/1985 1985 11 1 154 28 60 44 12 5966.5
11/2/1985 1985 11 2 155 33 65 49 17 5983.5
11/3/1985 1985 11 3 156 30 66 48 16 5999.5
11/4/1985 1985 11 4 157 32 65 48.5 16.5 6016
11/5/1985 1985 11 5 158 40 58 49 17 6033
11/6/1985 1985 11 6 159 30 65 47.5 15.5 6048.5
11/7/1985 1985 11 7 160 25 65 45 13 6061.5
11/8/1985 1985 11 8 161 36 69 52.5 20.5 6082
11/9/1985 1985 11 9 162 37 60 48.5 16.5 6098.5
11/10/1985 1985 11 10 163 25 58 41.5 9.5 6108
11/11/1985 1985 11 11 164 48 63 55.5 23.5 6131.5
11/12/1985 1985 11 12 165 32 43 37.5 5.5 6137
11/13/1985 1985 11 13 166 30 42 36 4 6141
11/14/1985 1985 11 14 167 28 42 35 3 6144
11/15/1985 1985 11 15 168 22 45 33.5 1.5 6145.5
11/16/1985 1985 11 16 169 32 40 36 4 6149.5
11/17/1985 1985 11 17 170 31 42 36.5 4.5 6154
11/18/1985 1985 11 18 171 25 40 32.5 0.5 6154.5
11/19/1985 1985 11 19 172 22 38 30 -2 6152.5
11/20/1985 1985 11 20 173 15 42 28.5 -3.5 6149
11/21/1985 1985 11 21 174 20 45 32.5 0.5 6149.5
11/22/1985 1985 11 22 175 18 57 37.5 5.5 6155
11/23/1985 1985 11 23 176 29 51 40 8 6163
11/24/1985 1985 11 24 177 40 55 47.5 15.5 6178.5
11/25/1985 1985 11 25 178 38 56 47 15 6193.5
11/26/1985 1985 11 26 179 25 57 41 9 6202.5
11/27/1985 1985 11 27 180 25 53 39 7 6209.5
11/28/1985 1985 11 28 181 30 50 40 8 6217.5
11/29/1985 1985 11 29 182 38 55 46.5 14.5 6232
11/30/1985 1985 11 30 183 30 52 41 9 6241
12/1/1985 1985 12 1 184 35 50 42.5 10.5 6251.5
12/2/1985 1985 12 2 185 38 44 41 9 6260.5
12/3/1985 1985 12 3 186 28 56 42 10 6270.5
12/4/1985 1985 12 4 187 25 50 37.5 5.5 6276
12/5/1985 1985 12 5 188 25 45 35 3 6279
12/6/1985 1985 12 6 189 25 50 37.5 5.5 6284.5
12/7/1985 1985 12 7 190 22 45 33.5 1.5 6286
12/8/1985 1985 12 8 191 28 42 35 3 6289
12/9/1985 1985 12 9 192 19 40 29.5 -2.5 6286.5
12/10/1985 1985 12 10 193 25 35 30 -2 6284.5
12/11/1985 1985 12 11 194 15 32 23.5 -8.5 6276
12/12/1985 1985 12 12 195 8 33 20.5 -11.5 6264.5
12/13/1985 1985 12 13 196 12 40 26 -6 6258.5
12/14/1985 1985 12 14 197 14 38 26 -6 6252.5
12/15/1985 1985 12 15 198 10 40 25 -7 6245.5
12/16/1985 1985 12 16 199 10 45 27.5 -4.5 6241
12/17/1985 1985 12 17 200 10 26 18 -14 6227
12/18/1985 1985 12 18 201 12 49 30.5 -1.5 6225.5
12/19/1985 1985 12 19 202 12 46 29 -3 6222.5
12/20/1985 1985 12 20 203 12 45 28.5 -3.5 6219
12/21/1985 1985 12 21 204 12 48 30 -2 6217
12/22/1985 1985 12 22 205 12 50 31 -1 6216
12/23/1985 1985 12 23 206 15 45 30 -2 6214
12/24/1985 1985 12 24 207 13 45 29 -3 6211
12/25/1985 1985 12 25 208 13 50 31.5 -0.5 6210.5
12/26/1985 1985 12 26 209 12 45 28.5 -3.5 6207
12/27/1985 1985 12 27 210 8 45 26.5 -5.5 6201.5
12/28/1985 1985 12 28 211 9 43 26 -6 6195.5
12/29/1985 1985 12 29 212 12 40 26 -6 6189.5
12/30/1985 1985 12 30 213 20 47 33.5 1.5 6191
12/31/1985 1985 12 31 214 15 38 26.5 -5.5 6185.5
1/1/1986 1986 1 1 215 25 40 32.5 0.5 6186
1/2/1986 1986 1 2 216 24 35 29.5 -2.5 6183.5
1/3/1986 1986 1 3 217 22 43 32.5 0.5 6184
1/4/1986 1986 1 4 218 15 42 28.5 -3.5 6180.5
1/5/1986 1986 1 5 219 17 38 27.5 -4.5 6176
1/6/1986 1986 1 6 220 12 40 26 -6 6170
1/7/1986 1986 1 7 221 2 38 20 -12 6158
1/8/1986 1986 1 8 222 2 45 23.5 -8.5 6149.5
1/9/1986 1986 1 9 223 8 48 28 -4 6145.5
1/10/1986 1986 1 10 224 13 50 31.5 -0.5 6145
1/11/1986 1986 1 11 225 14 50 32 0 6145
1/12/1986 1986 1 12 226 14 52 33 1 6146
1/13/1986 1986 1 13 227 14 49 31.5 -0.5 6145.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
1/14/1986 1986 1 14 228 14 43 28.5 -3.5 6142
1/15/1986 1986 1 15 229 25 41 33 1 6143
1/16/1986 1986 1 16 230 30 47 38.5 6.5 6149.5
1/17/1986 1986 1 17 231 25 48 36.5 4.5 6154
1/18/1986 1986 1 18 232 20 53 36.5 4.5 6158.5
1/19/1986 1986 1 19 233 25 53 39 7 6165.5
1/20/1986 1986 1 20 234 20 53 36.5 4.5 6170
1/21/1986 1986 1 21 235 18 43 30.5 -1.5 6168.5
1/22/1986 1986 1 22 236 22 40 31 -1 6167.5
1/23/1986 1986 1 23 237 20 44 32 0 6167.5
1/24/1986 1986 1 24 238 15 50 32.5 0.5 6168
1/25/1986 1986 1 25 239 12 50 31 -1 6167
1/26/1986 1986 1 26 240 11 50 30.5 -1.5 6165.5
1/27/1986 1986 1 27 241 12 53 32.5 0.5 6166
1/28/1986 1986 1 28 242 14 53 33.5 1.5 6167.5
1/29/1986 1986 1 29 243 15 55 35 3 6170.5
1/30/1986 1986 1 30 244 29 53 41 9 6179.5
1/31/1986 1986 1 31 245 35 61 48 16 6195.5
2/1/1986 1986 2 1 246 25 57 41 9 6204.5
2/2/1986 1986 2 2 247 20 58 39 7 6211.5
2/3/1986 1986 2 3 248 28 53 40.5 8.5 6220
2/4/1986 1986 2 4 249 14 51 32.5 0.5 6220.5
2/5/1986 1986 2 5 250 15 48 31.5 -0.5 6220
2/6/1986 1986 2 6 251 25 35 30 -2 6218
2/7/1986 1986 2 7 252 0 37 18.5 -13.5 6204.5
2/8/1986 1986 2 8 253 3 40 21.5 -10.5 6194
2/9/1986 1986 2 9 254 0 36 18 -14 6180
2/10/1986 1986 2 10 255 0 35 17.5 -14.5 6165.5
2/11/1986 1986 2 11 256 3 42 22.5 -9.5 6156
2/12/1986 1986 2 12 257 9 43 26 -6 6150
2/13/1986 1986 2 13 258 32 53 42.5 10.5 6160.5
2/14/1986 1986 2 14 259 38 50 44 12 6172.5
2/15/1986 1986 2 15 260 46 53 49.5 17.5 6190
2/16/1986 1986 2 16 261 32 59 45.5 13.5 6203.5
2/17/1986 1986 2 17 262 37 58 47.5 15.5 6219
2/18/1986 1986 2 18 263 44 67 55.5 23.5 6242.5
2/19/1986 1986 2 19 264 56 65 60.5 28.5 6271
2/20/1986 1986 2 20 265 39 58 48.5 16.5 6287.5
2/21/1986 1986 2 21 266 29 55 42 10 6297.5
2/22/1986 1986 2 22 267 22 57 39.5 7.5 6305
2/23/1986 1986 2 23 268 27 65 46 14 6319
2/24/1986 1986 2 24 269 35 70 52.5 20.5 6339.5
2/25/1986 1986 2 25 270 31 71 51 19 6358.5
2/26/1986 1986 2 26 271 32 70 51 19 6377.5
2/27/1986 1986 2 27 272 30 70 50 18 6395.5
2/28/1986 1986 2 28 273 26 66 46 14 6409.5
3/1/1986 1986 3 1 274 24 68 46 14 6423.5
3/2/1986 1986 3 2 275 30 67 48.5 16.5 6440
3/3/1986 1986 3 3 276 42 70 56 24 6464
3/4/1986 1986 3 4 277 30 72 51 19 6483
3/5/1986 1986 3 5 278 31 74 52.5 20.5 6503.5
3/6/1986 1986 3 6 279 43 72 57.5 25.5 6529
3/7/1986 1986 3 7 280 36 70 53 21 6550
3/8/1986 1986 3 8 281 53 68 60.5 28.5 6578.5
3/9/1986 1986 3 9 282 39 57 48 16 6594.5
3/10/1986 1986 3 10 283 41 55 48 16 6610.5
3/11/1986 1986 3 11 284 37 50 43.5 11.5 6622
3/12/1986 1986 3 12 285 32 57 44.5 12.5 6634.5
3/13/1986 1986 3 13 286 32 56 44 12 6646.5
3/14/1986 1986 3 14 287 36 49 42.5 10.5 6657
3/15/1986 1986 3 15 288 27 57 42 10 6667
3/16/1986 1986 3 16 289 38 55 46.5 14.5 6681.5
3/17/1986 1986 3 17 290 31 52 41.5 9.5 6691
3/18/1986 1986 3 18 291 30 50 40 8 6699
3/19/1986 1986 3 19 292 41 59 50 18 6717
3/20/1986 1986 3 20 293 27 62 44.5 12.5 6729.5
3/21/1986 1986 3 21 294 28 68 48 16 6745.5
3/22/1986 1986 3 22 295 32 74 53 21 6766.5
3/23/1986 1986 3 23 296 35 78 56.5 24.5 6791
3/24/1986 1986 3 24 297 42 72 57 25 6816
3/25/1986 1986 3 25 298 46 70 58 26 6842
3/26/1986 1986 3 26 299 40 73 56.5 24.5 6866.5
3/27/1986 1986 3 27 300 39 76 57.5 25.5 6892
3/28/1986 1986 3 28 301 37 80 58.5 26.5 6918.5
3/29/1986 1986 3 29 302 61 80 70.5 38.5 6957
3/30/1986 1986 3 30 303 42 80 61 29 6986
3/31/1986 1986 3 31 304 51 72 61.5 29.5 7015.5
4/1/1986 1986 4 1 305 50 63 56.5 24.5 7040
4/2/1986 1986 4 2 306 40 52 46 14 7054
4/3/1986 1986 4 3 307 44 53 48.5 16.5 7070.5
4/4/1986 1986 4 4 308 42 63 52.5 20.5 7091
4/5/1986 1986 4 5 309 47 70 58.5 26.5 7117.5
4/6/1986 1986 4 6 310 45 71 58 26 7143.5
4/7/1986 1986 4 7 311 47 67 57 25 7168.5
4/8/1986 1986 4 8 312 47 68 57.5 25.5 7194
4/9/1986 1986 4 9 313 39 67 53 21 7215
4/10/1986 1986 4 10 314 42 69 55.5 23.5 7238.5
4/11/1986 1986 4 11 315 49 70 59.5 27.5 7266
4/12/1986 1986 4 12 316 42 72 57 25 7291
4/13/1986 1986 4 13 317 42 51 46.5 14.5 7305.5
4/14/1986 1986 4 14 318 36 60 48 16 7321.5
4/15/1986 1986 4 15 319 37 70 53.5 21.5 7343
4/16/1986 1986 4 16 320 54 72 63 31 7374
4/17/1986 1986 4 17 321 45 56 50.5 18.5 7392.5
4/18/1986 1986 4 18 322 46 55 50.5 18.5 7411
4/19/1986 1986 4 19 323 55 66 60.5 28.5 7439.5
4/20/1986 1986 4 20 324 58 77 67.5 35.5 7475
4/21/1986 1986 4 21 325 50 81 65.5 33.5 7508.5
4/22/1986 1986 4 22 326 55 81 68 36 7544.5
4/23/1986 1986 4 23 327 58 72 65 33 7577.5
4/24/1986 1986 4 24 328 46 71 58.5 26.5 7604
4/25/1986 1986 4 25 329 44 70 57 25 7629
4/26/1986 1986 4 26 330 40 53 46.5 14.5 7643.5
4/27/1986 1986 4 27 331 42 68 55 23 7666.5
4/28/1986 1986 4 28 332 38 86 62 30 7696.5
4/29/1986 1986 4 29 333 65 85 75 43 7739.5
4/30/1986 1986 4 30 334 57 82 69.5 37.5 7777
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
5/1/1986 1986 5 1 335 68 84 76 44 7821
5/2/1986 1986 5 2 336 65 90 77.5 45.5 7866.5
5/3/1986 1986 5 3 337 73 87 80 48 7914.5
5/4/1986 1986 5 4 338 47 75 61 29 7943.5
5/5/1986 1986 5 5 339 47 73 60 28 7971.5
5/6/1986 1986 5 6 340 52 67 59.5 27.5 7999
5/7/1986 1986 5 7 341 40 50 45 13 8012
5/8/1986 1986 5 8 342 40 57 48.5 16.5 8028.5
5/9/1986 1986 5 9 343 44 60 52 20 8048.5
5/10/1986 1986 5 10 344 47 75 61 29 8077.5
5/11/1986 1986 5 11 345 62 80 71 39 8116.5
5/12/1986 1986 5 12 346 57 81 69 37 8153.5
5/13/1986 1986 5 13 347 60 81 70.5 38.5 8192
5/14/1986 1986 5 14 348 64 81 72.5 40.5 8232.5
5/15/1986 1986 5 15 349 45 54 49.5 17.5 8250
5/16/1986 1986 5 16 350 39 57 48 16 8266
5/17/1986 1986 5 17 351 39 60 49.5 17.5 8283.5
5/18/1986 1986 5 18 352 54 78 66 34 8317.5
5/19/1986 1986 5 19 353 55 88 71.5 39.5 8357
5/20/1986 1986 5 20 354 48 93 70.5 38.5 8395.5
5/21/1986 1986 5 21 355 74 88 81 49 8444.5
5/22/1986 1986 5 22 356 56 75 65.5 33.5 8478
5/23/1986 1986 5 23 357 52 78 65 33 8511
5/24/1986 1986 5 24 358 47 77 62 30 8541
5/25/1986 1986 5 25 359 50 89 69.5 37.5 8578.5
5/26/1986 1986 5 26 360 70 90 80 48 8626.5
5/27/1986 1986 5 27 361 48 85 66.5 34.5 8661
5/28/1986 1986 5 28 362 70 87 78.5 46.5 8707.5
5/29/1986 1986 5 29 363 53 84 68.5 36.5 8744
5/30/1986 1986 5 30 364 50 85 67.5 35.5 8779.5
5/31/1986 1986 5 31 365 53 90 71.5 39.5 8819
6/1/1986 1986 6 1 1 77 89 83 51 51
6/2/1986 1986 6 2 2 75 91 83 51 102
6/3/1986 1986 6 3 3 67 90 78.5 46.5 148.5
6/4/1986 1986 6 4 4 67 92 79.5 47.5 196
6/5/1986 1986 6 5 5 70 92 81 49 245
6/6/1986 1986 6 6 6 75 94 84.5 52.5 297.5
6/7/1986 1986 6 7 7 67 95 81 49 346.5
6/8/1986 1986 6 8 8 65 90 77.5 45.5 392
6/9/1986 1986 6 9 9 55 74 64.5 32.5 424.5
6/10/1986 1986 6 10 10 60 80 70 38 462.5
6/11/1986 1986 6 11 11 65 87 76 44 506.5
6/12/1986 1986 6 12 12 66 95 80.5 48.5 555
6/13/1986 1986 6 13 13 77 96 86.5 54.5 609.5
6/14/1986 1986 6 14 14 55 98 76.5 44.5 654
6/15/1986 1986 6 15 15 70 100 85 53 707
6/16/1986 1986 6 16 16 72 102 87 55 762
6/17/1986 1986 6 17 17 77 100 88.5 56.5 818.5
6/18/1986 1986 6 18 18 80 102 91 59 877.5
6/19/1986 1986 6 19 19 58 97 77.5 45.5 923
6/20/1986 1986 6 20 20 57 96 76.5 44.5 967.5
6/21/1986 1986 6 21 21 55 97 76 44 1011.5
6/22/1986 1986 6 22 22 74 96 85 53 1064.5
6/23/1986 1986 6 23 23 70 95 82.5 50.5 1115
6/24/1986 1986 6 24 24 68 95 81.5 49.5 1164.5
6/25/1986 1986 6 25 25 67 86 76.5 44.5 1209
6/26/1986 1986 6 26 26 66 95 80.5 48.5 1257.5
6/27/1986 1986 6 27 27 70 102 86 54 1311.5
6/28/1986 1986 6 28 28 80 101 90.5 58.5 1370
6/29/1986 1986 6 29 29 75 102 88.5 56.5 1426.5
6/30/1986 1986 6 30 30 77 95 86 54 1480.5
7/1/1986 1986 7 1 31 65 99 82 50 1530.5
7/2/1986 1986 7 2 32 59 102 80.5 48.5 1579
7/3/1986 1986 7 3 33 83 101 92 60 1639
7/4/1986 1986 7 4 34 80 97 88.5 56.5 1695.5
7/5/1986 1986 7 5 35 69 93 81 49 1744.5
7/6/1986 1986 7 6 36 72 92 82 50 1794.5
7/7/1986 1986 7 7 37 62 83 72.5 40.5 1835
7/8/1986 1986 7 8 38 66 97 81.5 49.5 1884.5
7/9/1986 1986 7 9 39 83 98 90.5 58.5 1943
7/10/1986 1986 7 10 40 62 97 79.5 47.5 1990.5
7/11/1986 1986 7 11 41 75 101 88 56 2046.5
7/12/1986 1986 7 12 42 62 98 80 48 2094.5
7/13/1986 1986 7 13 43 62 105 83.5 51.5 2146
7/14/1986 1986 7 14 44 81 103 92 60 2206
7/15/1986 1986 7 15 45 64 80 72 40 2246
7/16/1986 1986 7 16 46 64 88 76 44 2290
7/17/1986 1986 7 17 47 74 95 84.5 52.5 2342.5
7/18/1986 1986 7 18 48 78 96 87 55 2397.5
7/19/1986 1986 7 19 49 64 95 79.5 47.5 2445
7/20/1986 1986 7 20 50 62 87 74.5 42.5 2487.5
7/21/1986 1986 7 21 51 64 82 73 41 2528.5
7/22/1986 1986 7 22 52 68 81 74.5 42.5 2571
7/23/1986 1986 7 23 53 71 82 76.5 44.5 2615.5
7/24/1986 1986 7 24 54 64 78 71 39 2654.5
7/25/1986 1986 7 25 55 66 80 73 41 2695.5
7/26/1986 1986 7 26 56 57 94 75.5 43.5 2739
7/27/1986 1986 7 27 57 70 93 81.5 49.5 2788.5
7/28/1986 1986 7 28 58 49 99 74 42 2830.5
7/29/1986 1986 7 29 59 67 97 82 50 2880.5
7/30/1986 1986 7 30 60 53 95 74 42 2922.5
7/31/1986 1986 7 31 61 63 100 81.5 49.5 2972
8/1/1986 1986 8 1 62 70 103 86.5 54.5 3026.5
8/2/1986 1986 8 2 63 70 102 86 54 3080.5
8/3/1986 1986 8 3 64 65 102 83.5 51.5 3132
8/4/1986 1986 8 4 65 76 101 88.5 56.5 3188.5
8/5/1986 1986 8 5 66 74 91 82.5 50.5 3239
8/6/1986 1986 8 6 67 72 95 83.5 51.5 3290.5
8/7/1986 1986 8 7 68 72 96 84 52 3342.5
8/8/1986 1986 8 8 69 72 96 84 52 3394.5
8/9/1986 1986 8 9 70 74 93 83.5 51.5 3446
8/10/1986 1986 8 10 71 70 94 82 50 3496
8/11/1986 1986 8 11 72 70 98 84 52 3548
8/12/1986 1986 8 12 73 75 98 86.5 54.5 3602.5
8/13/1986 1986 8 13 74 64 88 76 44 3646.5
8/14/1986 1986 8 14 75 58 84 71 39 3685.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
8/15/1986 1986 8 15 76 52 99 75.5 43.5 3729
8/16/1986 1986 8 16 77 72 98 85 53 3782
8/17/1986 1986 8 17 78 91 101 96 64 3846
8/18/1986 1986 8 18 79 71 100 85.5 53.5 3899.5
8/19/1986 1986 8 19 80 75 101 88 56 3955.5
8/20/1986 1986 8 20 81 65 93 79 47 4002.5
8/21/1986 1986 8 21 82 66 83 74.5 42.5 4045
8/22/1986 1986 8 22 83 64 87 75.5 43.5 4088.5
8/23/1986 1986 8 23 84 68 88 78 46 4134.5
8/24/1986 1986 8 24 85 70 84 77 45 4179.5
8/25/1986 1986 8 25 86 58 92 75 43 4222.5
8/26/1986 1986 8 26 87 60 92 76 44 4266.5
8/27/1986 1986 8 27 88 65 92 78.5 46.5 4313
8/28/1986 1986 8 28 89 67 72 69.5 37.5 4350.5
8/29/1986 1986 8 29 90 61 86 73.5 41.5 4392
8/30/1986 1986 8 30 91 64 85 74.5 42.5 4434.5
8/31/1986 1986 8 31 92 58 89 73.5 41.5 4476
9/1/1986 1986 9 1 93 47 84 65.5 33.5 4509.5
9/2/1986 1986 9 2 94 48 80 64 32 4541.5
9/3/1986 1986 9 3 95 45 84 64.5 32.5 4574
9/4/1986 1986 9 4 96 45 90 67.5 35.5 4609.5
9/5/1986 1986 9 5 97 78 93 85.5 53.5 4663
9/6/1986 1986 9 6 98 57 96 76.5 44.5 4707.5
9/7/1986 1986 9 7 99 83 94 88.5 56.5 4764
9/8/1986 1986 9 8 100 64 73 68.5 36.5 4800.5
9/9/1986 1986 9 9 101 64 80 72 40 4840.5
9/10/1986 1986 9 10 102 48 72 60 28 4868.5
9/11/1986 1986 9 11 103 40 78 59 27 4895.5
9/12/1986 1986 9 12 104 48 80 64 32 4927.5
9/13/1986 1986 9 13 105 55 78 66.5 34.5 4962
9/14/1986 1986 9 14 106 43 84 63.5 31.5 4993.5
9/15/1986 1986 9 15 107 65 83 74 42 5035.5
9/16/1986 1986 9 16 108 64 82 73 41 5076.5
9/17/1986 1986 9 17 109 72 79 75.5 43.5 5120
9/18/1986 1986 9 18 110 70 80 75 43 5163
9/19/1986 1986 9 19 111 72 80 76 44 5207
9/20/1986 1986 9 20 112 54 80 67 35 5242
9/21/1986 1986 9 21 113 54 79 66.5 34.5 5276.5
9/22/1986 1986 9 22 114 47 67 57 25 5301.5
9/23/1986 1986 9 23 115 58 60 59 27 5328.5
9/25/1986 1986 9 25 117 53 58 55.5 23.5 5352
9/27/1986 1986 9 27 119 53 62 57.5 25.5 5377.5
9/28/1986 1986 9 28 120 47 57 52 20 5397.5
9/29/1986 1986 9 29 121 40 64 52 20 5417.5
9/30/1986 1986 9 30 122 45 64 54.5 22.5 5440
10/1/1986 1986 10 1 123 40 65 52.5 20.5 5460.5
10/2/1986 1986 10 2 124 49 62 55.5 23.5 5484
10/3/1986 1986 10 3 125 42 54 48 16 5500
10/4/1986 1986 10 4 126 35 63 49 17 5517
10/5/1986 1986 10 5 127 37 67 52 20 5537
10/6/1986 1986 10 6 128 37 67 52 20 5557
10/7/1986 1986 10 7 129 40 74 57 25 5582
10/8/1986 1986 10 8 130 60 75 67.5 35.5 5617.5
10/9/1986 1986 10 9 131 38 72 55 23 5640.5
10/10/1986 1986 10 10 132 42 70 56 24 5664.5
10/11/1986 1986 10 11 133 36 50 43 11 5675.5
10/12/1986 1986 10 12 134 34 51 42.5 10.5 5686
10/13/1986 1986 10 13 135 32 55 43.5 11.5 5697.5
10/14/1986 1986 10 14 136 30 60 45 13 5710.5
10/15/1986 1986 10 15 137 32 63 47.5 15.5 5726
10/16/1986 1986 10 16 138 34 68 51 19 5745
10/17/1986 1986 10 17 139 37 67 52 20 5765
10/18/1986 1986 10 18 140 47 70 58.5 26.5 5791.5
10/19/1986 1986 10 19 141 48 68 58 26 5817.5
10/20/1986 1986 10 20 142 36 61 48.5 16.5 5834
10/21/1986 1986 10 21 143 35 60 47.5 15.5 5849.5
10/22/1986 1986 10 22 144 34 63 48.5 16.5 5866
10/23/1986 1986 10 23 145 34 64 49 17 5883
10/24/1986 1986 10 24 146 34 34 34 2 5885
10/25/1986 1986 10 25 147 35 70 52.5 20.5 5905.5
10/26/1986 1986 10 26 148 32 70 51 19 5924.5
10/27/1986 1986 10 27 149 42 65 53.5 21.5 5946
10/28/1986 1986 10 28 150 32 70 51 19 5965
10/29/1986 1986 10 29 151 41 68 54.5 22.5 5987.5
10/30/1986 1986 10 30 152 35 70 52.5 20.5 6008
10/31/1986 1986 10 31 153 42 46 44 12 6020
11/1/1986 1986 11 1 154 40 45 42.5 10.5 6030.5
11/2/1986 1986 11 2 155 46 55 50.5 18.5 6049
11/3/1986 1986 11 3 156 34 38 36 4 6053
11/4/1986 1986 11 4 157 30 62 46 14 6067
11/5/1986 1986 11 5 158 32 60 46 14 6081
11/6/1986 1986 11 6 159 30 45 37.5 5.5 6086.5
11/7/1986 1986 11 7 160 30 33 31.5 -0.5 6086
11/8/1986 1986 11 8 161 27 42 34.5 2.5 6088.5
11/9/1986 1986 11 9 162 24 50 37 5 6093.5
11/10/1986 1986 11 10 163 20 52 36 4 6097.5
11/11/1986 1986 11 11 164 20 50 35 3 6100.5
11/12/1986 1986 11 12 165 22 28 25 -7 6093.5
11/13/1986 1986 11 13 166 31 55 43 11 6104.5
11/14/1986 1986 11 14 167 24 40 32 0 6104.5
11/15/1986 1986 11 15 168 34 66 50 18 6122.5
11/16/1986 1986 11 16 169 26 66 46 14 6136.5
11/17/1986 1986 11 17 170 31 70 50.5 18.5 6155
11/18/1986 1986 11 18 171 36 49 42.5 10.5 6165.5
11/19/1986 1986 11 19 172 36 62 49 17 6182.5
11/20/1986 1986 11 20 173 31 57 44 12 6194.5
11/21/1986 1986 11 21 174 25 54 39.5 7.5 6202
11/22/1986 1986 11 22 175 37 50 43.5 11.5 6213.5
11/23/1986 1986 11 23 176 22 48 35 3 6216.5
11/24/1986 1986 11 24 177 22 50 36 4 6220.5
11/25/1986 1986 11 25 178 22 44 33 1 6221.5
11/26/1986 1986 11 26 179 26 55 40.5 8.5 6230
11/27/1986 1986 11 27 180 20 49 34.5 2.5 6232.5
11/28/1986 1986 11 28 181 20 51 35.5 3.5 6236
11/29/1986 1986 11 29 182 31 50 40.5 8.5 6244.5
11/30/1986 1986 11 30 183 32 53 42.5 10.5 6255
12/1/1986 1986 12 1 184 18 49 33.5 1.5 6256.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
12/2/1986 1986 12 2 185 15 48 31.5 -0.5 6256
12/3/1986 1986 12 3 186 18 51 34.5 2.5 6258.5
12/4/1986 1986 12 4 187 17 47 32 0 6258.5
12/5/1986 1986 12 5 188 33 47 40 8 6266.5
12/6/1986 1986 12 6 189 40 42 41 9 6275.5
12/7/1986 1986 12 7 190 32 47 39.5 7.5 6283
12/8/1986 1986 12 8 191 25 47 36 4 6287
12/9/1986 1986 12 9 192 27 38 32.5 0.5 6287.5
12/10/1986 1986 12 10 193 13 36 24.5 -7.5 6280
12/11/1986 1986 12 11 194 10 38 24 -8 6272
12/12/1986 1986 12 12 195 11 18 14.5 -17.5 6254.5
12/13/1986 1986 12 13 196 11 40 25.5 -6.5 6248
12/14/1986 1986 12 14 197 20 44 32 0 6248
12/15/1986 1986 12 15 198 27 40 33.5 1.5 6249.5
12/16/1986 1986 12 16 199 18 45 31.5 -0.5 6249
12/17/1986 1986 12 17 200 19 42 30.5 -1.5 6247.5
12/18/1986 1986 12 18 201 23 36 29.5 -2.5 6245
12/19/1986 1986 12 19 202 28 42 35 3 6248
12/20/1986 1986 12 20 203 25 42 33.5 1.5 6249.5
12/21/1986 1986 12 21 204 17 48 32.5 0.5 6250
12/22/1986 1986 12 22 205 15 45 30 -2 6248
12/23/1986 1986 12 23 206 15 38 26.5 -5.5 6242.5
12/24/1986 1986 12 24 207 14 48 31 -1 6241.5
12/25/1986 1986 12 25 208 10 42 26 -6 6235.5
12/26/1986 1986 12 26 209 10 40 25 -7 6228.5
12/27/1986 1986 12 27 210 18 47 32.5 0.5 6229
12/28/1986 1986 12 28 211 12 48 30 -2 6227
12/29/1986 1986 12 29 212 9 45 27 -5 6222
12/30/1986 1986 12 30 213 11 42 26.5 -5.5 6216.5
12/31/1986 1986 12 31 214 27 41 34 2 6218.5
1/1/1987 1987 1 1 215 15 39 27 -5 6213.5
1/2/1987 1987 1 2 216 21 50 35.5 3.5 6217
1/3/1987 1987 1 3 217 20 39 29.5 -2.5 6214.5
1/4/1987 1987 1 4 218 18 45 31.5 -0.5 6214
1/5/1987 1987 1 5 219 31 42 36.5 4.5 6218.5
1/6/1987 1987 1 6 220 22 40 31 -1 6217.5
1/7/1987 1987 1 7 221 22 35 28.5 -3.5 6214
1/8/1987 1987 1 8 222 16 40 28 -4 6210
1/9/1987 1987 1 9 223 10 37 23.5 -8.5 6201.5
1/10/1987 1987 1 10 224 9 37 23 -9 6192.5
1/11/1987 1987 1 11 225 8 40 24 -8 6184.5
1/12/1987 1987 1 12 226 9 40 24.5 -7.5 6177
1/13/1987 1987 1 13 227 8 40 24 -8 6169
1/14/1987 1987 1 14 228 11 42 26.5 -5.5 6163.5
1/15/1987 1987 1 15 229 5 26 15.5 -16.5 6147
1/16/1987 1987 1 16 230 15 32 23.5 -8.5 6138.5
1/17/1987 1987 1 17 231 -16 16 0 -32 6106.5
1/18/1987 1987 1 18 232 -21 15 -3 -35 6071.5
1/19/1987 1987 1 19 233 2 25 13.5 -18.5 6053
1/20/1987 1987 1 20 234 -18 15 -1.5 -33.5 6019.5
1/21/1987 1987 1 21 235 -16 22 3 -29 5990.5
1/22/1987 1987 1 22 236 -13 4 -4.5 -36.5 5954
1/23/1987 1987 1 23 237 5 25 15 -17 5937
1/24/1987 1987 1 24 238 -6 30 12 -20 5917
1/25/1987 1987 1 25 239 -2 33 15.5 -16.5 5900.5
1/26/1987 1987 1 26 240 -2 33 15.5 -16.5 5884
1/27/1987 1987 1 27 241 8 32 20 -12 5872
1/28/1987 1987 1 28 242 25 53 39 7 5879
1/29/1987 1987 1 29 243 21 38 29.5 -2.5 5876.5
1/30/1987 1987 1 30 244 21 38 29.5 -2.5 5874
1/31/1987 1987 1 31 245 25 37 31 -1 5873
2/1/1987 1987 2 1 246 22 45 33.5 1.5 5874.5
2/2/1987 1987 2 2 247 24 41 32.5 0.5 5875
2/3/1987 1987 2 3 248 28 40 34 2 5877
2/4/1987 1987 2 4 249 32 52 42 10 5887
2/5/1987 1987 2 5 250 24 52 38 6 5893
2/6/1987 1987 2 6 251 24 53 38.5 6.5 5899.5
2/7/1987 1987 2 7 252 23 52 37.5 5.5 5905
2/8/1987 1987 2 8 253 30 48 39 7 5912
2/9/1987 1987 2 9 254 32 50 41 9 5921
2/10/1987 1987 2 10 255 30 45 37.5 5.5 5926.5
2/11/1987 1987 2 11 256 31 48 39.5 7.5 5934
2/12/1987 1987 2 12 257 30 40 35 3 5937
2/13/1987 1987 2 13 258 36 50 43 11 5948
2/14/1987 1987 2 14 259 35 47 41 9 5957
2/15/1987 1987 2 15 260 22 41 31.5 -0.5 5956.5
2/16/1987 1987 2 16 261 33 47 40 8 5964.5
2/17/1987 1987 2 17 262 30 41 35.5 3.5 5968
2/18/1987 1987 2 18 263 22 46 34 2 5970
2/19/1987 1987 2 19 264 20 45 32.5 0.5 5970.5
2/20/1987 1987 2 20 265 28 49 38.5 6.5 5977
2/21/1987 1987 2 21 266 25 47 36 4 5981
2/22/1987 1987 2 22 267 17 52 34.5 2.5 5983.5
2/23/1987 1987 2 23 268 39 50 44.5 12.5 5996
2/24/1987 1987 2 24 269 29 39 34 2 5998
2/25/1987 1987 2 25 270 22 40 31 -1 5997
2/26/1987 1987 2 26 271 28 42 35 3 6000
2/27/1987 1987 2 27 272 24 44 34 2 6002
2/28/1987 1987 2 28 273 15 45 30 -2 6000
3/1/1987 1987 3 1 274 22 40 31 -1 5999
3/2/1987 1987 3 2 275 18 55 36.5 4.5 6003.5
3/3/1987 1987 3 3 276 20 60 40 8 6011.5
3/4/1987 1987 3 4 277 20 63 41.5 9.5 6021
3/5/1987 1987 3 5 278 24 63 43.5 11.5 6032.5
3/6/1987 1987 3 6 279 30 60 45 13 6045.5
3/7/1987 1987 3 7 280 25 64 44.5 12.5 6058
3/8/1987 1987 3 8 281 38 51 44.5 12.5 6070.5
3/9/1987 1987 3 9 282 42 58 50 18 6088.5
3/10/1987 1987 3 10 283 25 60 42.5 10.5 6099
3/11/1987 1987 3 11 284 32 32 32 0 6099
3/12/1987 1987 3 12 285 39 50 44.5 12.5 6111.5
3/13/1987 1987 3 13 286 43 70 56.5 24.5 6136
3/14/1987 1987 3 14 287 30 58 44 12 6148
3/15/1987 1987 3 15 288 38 45 41.5 9.5 6157.5
3/16/1987 1987 3 16 289 32 36 34 2 6159.5
3/17/1987 1987 3 17 290 34 53 43.5 11.5 6171
3/18/1987 1987 3 18 291 30 65 47.5 15.5 6186.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
3/19/1987 1987 3 19 292 35 48 41.5 9.5 6196
3/20/1987 1987 3 20 293 32 45 38.5 6.5 6202.5
3/21/1987 1987 3 21 294 32 45 38.5 6.5 6209
3/22/1987 1987 3 22 295 27 43 35 3 6212
3/23/1987 1987 3 23 296 22 51 36.5 4.5 6216.5
3/24/1987 1987 3 24 297 40 50 45 13 6229.5
3/25/1987 1987 3 25 298 25 49 37 5 6234.5
3/26/1987 1987 3 26 299 22 58 40 8 6242.5
3/27/1987 1987 3 27 300 30 42 36 4 6246.5
3/28/1987 1987 3 28 301 20 50 35 3 6249.5
3/29/1987 1987 3 29 302 28 44 36 4 6253.5
3/30/1987 1987 3 30 303 22 53 37.5 5.5 6259
3/31/1987 1987 3 31 304 30 62 46 14 6273
4/1/1987 1987 4 1 305 31 72 51.5 19.5 6292.5
4/2/1987 1987 4 2 306 30 60 45 13 6305.5
4/3/1987 1987 4 3 307 32 69 50.5 18.5 6324
4/4/1987 1987 4 4 308 42 52 47 15 6339
4/5/1987 1987 4 5 309 39 55 47 15 6354
4/6/1987 1987 4 6 310 44 60 52 20 6374
4/7/1987 1987 4 7 311 44 65 54.5 22.5 6396.5
4/8/1987 1987 4 8 312 40 74 57 25 6421.5
4/9/1987 1987 4 9 313 52 67 59.5 27.5 6449
4/10/1987 1987 4 10 314 42 72 57 25 6474
4/11/1987 1987 4 11 315 45 65 55 23 6497
4/12/1987 1987 4 12 316 44 55 49.5 17.5 6514.5
4/13/1987 1987 4 13 317 32 63 47.5 15.5 6530
4/14/1987 1987 4 14 318 39 74 56.5 24.5 6554.5
4/15/1987 1987 4 15 319 47 82 64.5 32.5 6587
4/16/1987 1987 4 16 320 53 86 69.5 37.5 6624.5
4/17/1987 1987 4 17 321 72 88 80 48 6672.5
4/18/1987 1987 4 18 322 67 81 74 42 6714.5
4/19/1987 1987 4 19 323 40 55 47.5 15.5 6730
4/20/1987 1987 4 20 324 45 59 52 20 6750
4/21/1987 1987 4 21 325 42 69 55.5 23.5 6773.5
4/22/1987 1987 4 22 326 50 68 59 27 6800.5
4/23/1987 1987 4 23 327 52 66 59 27 6827.5
4/24/1987 1987 4 24 328 60 85 72.5 40.5 6868
4/25/1987 1987 4 25 329 58 85 71.5 39.5 6907.5
4/26/1987 1987 4 26 330 60 85 72.5 40.5 6948
4/27/1987 1987 4 27 331 62 83 72.5 40.5 6988.5
4/28/1987 1987 4 28 332 58 85 71.5 39.5 7028
4/29/1987 1987 4 29 333 64 85 74.5 42.5 7070.5
4/30/1987 1987 4 30 334 62 80 71 39 7109.5
5/1/1987 1987 5 1 335 65 78 71.5 39.5 7149
5/2/1987 1987 5 2 336 57 65 61 29 7178
5/3/1987 1987 5 3 337 54 70 62 30 7208
5/4/1987 1987 5 4 338 53 75 64 32 7240
5/5/1987 1987 5 5 339 50 80 65 33 7273
5/6/1987 1987 5 6 340 62 75 68.5 36.5 7309.5
5/7/1987 1987 5 7 341 60 80 70 38 7347.5
5/8/1987 1987 5 8 342 58 85 71.5 39.5 7387
5/9/1987 1987 5 9 343 67 88 77.5 45.5 7432.5
5/10/1987 1987 5 10 344 67 89 78 46 7478.5
5/11/1987 1987 5 11 345 65 81 73 41 7519.5
5/12/1987 1987 5 12 346 64 84 74 42 7561.5
5/13/1987 1987 5 13 347 65 85 75 43 7604.5
5/14/1987 1987 5 14 348 64 90 77 45 7649.5
5/15/1987 1987 5 15 349 67 83 75 43 7692.5
5/16/1987 1987 5 16 350 60 75 67.5 35.5 7728
5/17/1987 1987 5 17 351 63 80 71.5 39.5 7767.5
5/18/1987 1987 5 18 352 62 85 73.5 41.5 7809
5/19/1987 1987 5 19 353 57 79 68 36 7845
5/20/1987 1987 5 20 354 52 72 62 30 7875
5/21/1987 1987 5 21 355 48 70 59 27 7902
5/22/1987 1987 5 22 356 57 77 67 35 7937
5/23/1987 1987 5 23 357 68 79 73.5 41.5 7978.5
5/24/1987 1987 5 24 358 55 74 64.5 32.5 8011
5/25/1987 1987 5 25 359 47 62 54.5 22.5 8033.5
5/26/1987 1987 5 26 360 48 63 55.5 23.5 8057
5/27/1987 1987 5 27 361 49 70 59.5 27.5 8084.5
5/28/1987 1987 5 28 362 60 74 67 35 8119.5
5/29/1987 1987 5 29 363 57 74 65.5 33.5 8153
5/30/1987 1987 5 30 364 60 81 70.5 38.5 8191.5
5/31/1987 1987 5 31 365 60 90 75 43 8234.5
6/1/1987 1987 6 1 1 69 84 76.5 44.5 44.5
6/2/1987 1987 6 2 2 58 87 72.5 40.5 85
6/3/1987 1987 6 3 3 63 88 75.5 43.5 128.5
6/4/1987 1987 6 4 4 65 95 80 48 176.5
6/5/1987 1987 6 5 5 75 91 83 51 227.5
6/6/1987 1987 6 6 6 73 88 80.5 48.5 276
6/7/1987 1987 6 7 7 75 87 81 49 325
6/8/1987 1987 6 8 8 62 88 75 43 368
6/9/1987 1987 6 9 9 67 90 78.5 46.5 414.5
6/10/1987 1987 6 10 10 70 90 80 48 462.5
6/11/1987 1987 6 11 11 53 97 75 43 505.5
6/12/1987 1987 6 12 12 87 96 91.5 59.5 565
6/13/1987 1987 6 13 13 79 97 88 56 621
6/14/1987 1987 6 14 14 86 102 94 62 683
6/15/1987 1987 6 15 15 82 100 91 59 742
6/16/1987 1987 6 16 16 67 92 79.5 47.5 789.5
6/17/1987 1987 6 17 17 67 97 82 50 839.5
6/18/1987 1987 6 18 18 72 95 83.5 51.5 891
6/19/1987 1987 6 19 19 78 93 85.5 53.5 944.5
6/20/1987 1987 6 20 20 73 97 85 53 997.5
6/21/1987 1987 6 21 21 73 100 86.5 54.5 1052
6/22/1987 1987 6 22 22 82 90 86 54 1106
6/23/1987 1987 6 23 23 72 93 82.5 50.5 1156.5
6/24/1987 1987 6 24 24 83 99 91 59 1215.5
6/25/1987 1987 6 25 25 72 98 85 53 1268.5
6/26/1987 1987 6 26 26 70 98 84 52 1320.5
6/27/1987 1987 6 27 27 76 96 86 54 1374.5
6/28/1987 1987 6 28 28 71 96 83.5 51.5 1426
6/29/1987 1987 6 29 29 60 81 70.5 38.5 1464.5
6/30/1987 1987 6 30 30 78 92 85 53 1517.5
7/1/1987 1987 7 1 31 75 98 86.5 54.5 1572
7/2/1987 1987 7 2 32 72 97 84.5 52.5 1624.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
7/3/1987 1987 7 3 33 65 100 82.5 50.5 1675
7/4/1987 1987 7 4 34 70 100 85 53 1728
7/5/1987 1987 7 5 35 90 100 95 63 1791
7/6/1987 1987 7 6 36 76 99 87.5 55.5 1846.5
7/7/1987 1987 7 7 37 70 97 83.5 51.5 1898
7/8/1987 1987 7 8 38 75 104 89.5 57.5 1955.5
7/9/1987 1987 7 9 39 78 97 87.5 55.5 2011
7/10/1987 1987 7 10 40 83 92 87.5 55.5 2066.5
7/11/1987 1987 7 11 41 70 81 75.5 43.5 2110
7/12/1987 1987 7 12 42 60 85 72.5 40.5 2150.5
7/13/1987 1987 7 13 43 62 89 75.5 43.5 2194
7/14/1987 1987 7 14 44 70 95 82.5 50.5 2244.5
7/15/1987 1987 7 15 45 72 97 84.5 52.5 2297
7/16/1987 1987 7 16 46 70 95 82.5 50.5 2347.5
7/17/1987 1987 7 17 47 70 87 78.5 46.5 2394
7/18/1987 1987 7 18 48 77 85 81 49 2443
7/19/1987 1987 7 19 49 65 93 79 47 2490
7/20/1987 1987 7 20 50 63 73 68 36 2526
7/21/1987 1987 7 21 51 72 94 83 51 2577
7/22/1987 1987 7 22 52 68 94 81 49 2626
7/23/1987 1987 7 23 53 60 101 80.5 48.5 2674.5
7/24/1987 1987 7 24 54 65 97 81 49 2723.5
7/25/1987 1987 7 25 55 72 88 80 48 2771.5
7/26/1987 1987 7 26 56 72 92 82 50 2821.5
7/27/1987 1987 7 27 57 68 90 79 47 2868.5
7/28/1987 1987 7 28 58 70 88 79 47 2915.5
7/29/1987 1987 7 29 59 67 88 77.5 45.5 2961
7/30/1987 1987 7 30 60 66 80 73 41 3002
7/31/1987 1987 7 31 61 74 87 80.5 48.5 3050.5
8/1/1987 1987 8 1 62 86 96 91 59 3109.5
8/2/1987 1987 8 2 63 56 95 75.5 43.5 3153
8/3/1987 1987 8 3 64 75 99 87 55 3208
8/4/1987 1987 8 4 65 60 78 69 37 3245
8/5/1987 1987 8 5 66 88 96 92 60 3305
8/6/1987 1987 8 6 67 70 98 84 52 3357
8/7/1987 1987 8 7 68 64 83 73.5 41.5 3398.5
8/8/1987 1987 8 8 69 75 90 82.5 50.5 3449
8/9/1987 1987 8 9 70 72 83 77.5 45.5 3494.5
8/10/1987 1987 8 10 71 77 96 86.5 54.5 3549
8/11/1987 1987 8 11 72 75 97 86 54 3603
8/12/1987 1987 8 12 73 70 93 81.5 49.5 3652.5
8/13/1987 1987 8 13 74 69 85 77 45 3697.5
8/14/1987 1987 8 14 75 54 87 70.5 38.5 3736
8/15/1987 1987 8 15 76 70 87 78.5 46.5 3782.5
8/16/1987 1987 8 16 77 72 92 82 50 3832.5
8/17/1987 1987 8 17 78 69 97 83 51 3883.5
8/18/1987 1987 8 18 79 70 95 82.5 50.5 3934
8/19/1987 1987 8 19 80 64 98 81 49 3983
8/20/1987 1987 8 20 81 70 84 77 45 4028
8/21/1987 1987 8 21 82 61 85 73 41 4069
8/22/1987 1987 8 22 83 70 90 80 48 4117
8/23/1987 1987 8 23 84 69 87 78 46 4163
8/24/1987 1987 8 24 85 72 78 75 43 4206
8/25/1987 1987 8 25 86 58 80 69 37 4243
8/26/1987 1987 8 26 87 53 80 66.5 34.5 4277.5
8/27/1987 1987 8 27 88 57 77 67 35 4312.5
8/28/1987 1987 8 28 89 59 87 73 41 4353.5
8/29/1987 1987 8 29 90 59 89 74 42 4395.5
8/30/1987 1987 8 30 91 77 93 85 53 4448.5
8/31/1987 1987 8 31 92 60 95 77.5 45.5 4494
9/1/1987 1987 9 1 93 59 94 76.5 44.5 4538.5
9/2/1987 1987 9 2 94 64 94 79 47 4585.5
9/3/1987 1987 9 3 95 70 90 80 48 4633.5
9/4/1987 1987 9 4 96 53 77 65 33 4666.5
9/5/1987 1987 9 5 97 67 82 74.5 42.5 4709
9/6/1987 1987 9 6 98 58 84 71 39 4748
9/7/1987 1987 9 7 99 63 84 73.5 41.5 4789.5
9/8/1987 1987 9 8 100 55 83 69 37 4826.5
9/9/1987 1987 9 9 101 55 83 69 37 4863.5
9/10/1987 1987 9 10 102 54 90 72 40 4903.5
9/11/1987 1987 9 11 103 55 87 71 39 4942.5
9/12/1987 1987 9 12 104 47 90 68.5 36.5 4979
9/13/1987 1987 9 13 105 53 67 60 28 5007
9/14/1987 1987 9 14 106 46 72 59 27 5034
9/15/1987 1987 9 15 107 53 87 70 38 5072
9/16/1987 1987 9 16 108 53 82 67.5 35.5 5107.5
9/17/1987 1987 9 17 109 57 86 71.5 39.5 5147
9/18/1987 1987 9 18 110 68 81 74.5 42.5 5189.5
9/19/1987 1987 9 19 111 55 87 71 39 5228.5
9/20/1987 1987 9 20 112 57 85 71 39 5267.5
9/21/1987 1987 9 21 113 47 82 64.5 32.5 5300
9/22/1987 1987 9 22 114 46 83 64.5 32.5 5332.5
9/23/1987 1987 9 23 115 48 86 67 35 5367.5
9/24/1987 1987 9 24 116 45 55 50 18 5385.5
9/25/1987 1987 9 25 117 60 84 72 40 5425.5
9/26/1987 1987 9 26 118 53 86 69.5 37.5 5463
9/27/1987 1987 9 27 119 56 82 69 37 5500
9/28/1987 1987 9 28 120 44 79 61.5 29.5 5529.5
9/29/1987 1987 9 29 121 50 79 64.5 32.5 5562
9/30/1987 1987 9 30 122 45 82 63.5 31.5 5593.5
10/1/1987 1987 10 1 123 39 82 60.5 28.5 5622
10/2/1987 1987 10 2 124 81 84 82.5 50.5 5672.5
10/3/1987 1987 10 3 125 53 85 69 37 5709.5
10/4/1987 1987 10 4 126 85 85 85 53 5762.5
10/5/1987 1987 10 5 127 47 84 65.5 33.5 5796
10/6/1987 1987 10 6 128 48 83 65.5 33.5 5829.5
10/7/1987 1987 10 7 129 60 85 72.5 40.5 5870
10/8/1987 1987 10 8 130 45 84 64.5 32.5 5902.5
10/9/1987 1987 10 9 131 42 85 63.5 31.5 5934
10/10/1987 1987 10 10 132 45 82 63.5 31.5 5965.5
10/11/1987 1987 10 11 133 62 79 70.5 38.5 6004
10/12/1987 1987 10 12 134 50 76 63 31 6035
10/13/1987 1987 10 13 135 50 57 53.5 21.5 6056.5
10/14/1987 1987 10 14 136 45 62 53.5 21.5 6078
10/15/1987 1987 10 15 137 38 62 50 18 6096
10/16/1987 1987 10 16 138 38 65 51.5 19.5 6115.5
10/17/1987 1987 10 17 139 35 68 51.5 19.5 6135
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
10/18/1987 1987 10 18 140 33 74 53.5 21.5 6156.5
10/19/1987 1987 10 19 141 35 70 52.5 20.5 6177
10/20/1987 1987 10 20 142 31 67 49 17 6194
10/21/1987 1987 10 21 143 44 57 50.5 18.5 6212.5
10/22/1987 1987 10 22 144 34 68 51 19 6231.5
10/23/1987 1987 10 23 145 45 65 55 23 6254.5
10/24/1987 1987 10 24 146 42 54 48 16 6270.5
10/25/1987 1987 10 25 147 41 66 53.5 21.5 6292
10/26/1987 1987 10 26 148 37 65 51 19 6311
10/27/1987 1987 10 27 149 35 69 52 20 6331
10/28/1987 1987 10 28 150 41 63 52 20 6351
10/29/1987 1987 10 29 151 40 59 49.5 17.5 6368.5
10/30/1987 1987 10 30 152 42 64 53 21 6389.5
10/31/1987 1987 10 31 153 37 53 45 13 6402.5
11/1/1987 1987 11 1 154 48 57 52.5 20.5 6423
11/2/1987 1987 11 2 155 40 60 50 18 6441
11/3/1987 1987 11 3 156 42 60 51 19 6460
11/4/1987 1987 11 4 157 37 63 50 18 6478
11/5/1987 1987 11 5 158 38 57 47.5 15.5 6493.5
11/6/1987 1987 11 6 159 43 56 49.5 17.5 6511
11/7/1987 1987 11 7 160 35 57 46 14 6525
11/8/1987 1987 11 8 161 32 58 45 13 6538
11/9/1987 1987 11 9 162 28 57 42.5 10.5 6548.5
11/10/1987 1987 11 10 163 27 58 42.5 10.5 6559
11/11/1987 1987 11 11 164 26 54 40 8 6567
11/12/1987 1987 11 12 165 25 46 35.5 3.5 6570.5
11/13/1987 1987 11 13 166 31 57 44 12 6582.5
11/14/1987 1987 11 14 167 36 47 41.5 9.5 6592
11/15/1987 1987 11 15 168 28 48 38 6 6598
11/16/1987 1987 11 16 169 25 45 35 3 6601
11/17/1987 1987 11 17 170 20 48 34 2 6603
11/18/1987 1987 11 18 171 14 40 27 -5 6598
11/19/1987 1987 11 19 172 14 44 29 -3 6595
11/20/1987 1987 11 20 173 13 47 30 -2 6593
11/21/1987 1987 11 21 174 17 42 29.5 -2.5 6590.5
11/22/1987 1987 11 22 175 21 48 34.5 2.5 6593
11/23/1987 1987 11 23 176 28 49 38.5 6.5 6599.5
11/24/1987 1987 11 24 177 16 46 31 -1 6598.5
11/25/1987 1987 11 25 178 20 38 29 -3 6595.5
11/26/1987 1987 11 26 179 22 45 33.5 1.5 6597
11/27/1987 1987 11 27 180 18 45 31.5 -0.5 6596.5
11/28/1987 1987 11 28 181 15 34 24.5 -7.5 6589
11/29/1987 1987 11 29 182 19 47 33 1 6590
11/30/1987 1987 11 30 183 19 45 32 0 6590
12/1/1987 1987 12 1 184 13 45 29 -3 6587
12/2/1987 1987 12 2 185 17 42 29.5 -2.5 6584.5
12/3/1987 1987 12 3 186 18 48 33 1 6585.5
12/4/1987 1987 12 4 187 22 39 30.5 -1.5 6584
12/5/1987 1987 12 5 188 30 47 38.5 6.5 6590.5
12/6/1987 1987 12 6 189 28 47 37.5 5.5 6596
12/7/1987 1987 12 7 190 28 45 36.5 4.5 6600.5
12/8/1987 1987 12 8 191 19 45 32 0 6600.5
12/9/1987 1987 12 9 192 15 45 30 -2 6598.5
12/10/1987 1987 12 10 193 18 49 33.5 1.5 6600
12/11/1987 1987 12 11 194 17 52 34.5 2.5 6602.5
12/12/1987 1987 12 12 195 20 35 27.5 -4.5 6598
12/13/1987 1987 12 13 196 19 27 23 -9 6589
12/14/1987 1987 12 14 197 17 33 25 -7 6582
12/15/1987 1987 12 15 198 5 36 20.5 -11.5 6570.5
12/16/1987 1987 12 16 199 15 32 23.5 -8.5 6562
12/17/1987 1987 12 17 200 25 41 33 1 6563
12/18/1987 1987 12 18 201 30 45 37.5 5.5 6568.5
12/19/1987 1987 12 19 202 22 38 30 -2 6566.5
12/20/1987 1987 12 20 203 19 35 27 -5 6561.5
12/21/1987 1987 12 21 204 22 40 31 -1 6560.5
12/22/1987 1987 12 22 205 25 40 32.5 0.5 6561
12/23/1987 1987 12 23 206 22 34 28 -4 6557
12/24/1987 1987 12 24 207 12 24 18 -14 6543
12/25/1987 1987 12 25 208 9 29 19 -13 6530
12/26/1987 1987 12 26 209 9 31 20 -12 6518
12/27/1987 1987 12 27 210 13 42 27.5 -4.5 6513.5
12/28/1987 1987 12 28 211 5 32 18.5 -13.5 6500
12/29/1987 1987 12 29 212 9 35 22 -10 6490
12/30/1987 1987 12 30 213 14 40 27 -5 6485
12/31/1987 1987 12 31 214 2 18 10 -22 6463
1/1/1988 1988 1 1 215 -1 35 17 -15 6448
1/2/1988 1988 1 2 216 0 26 13 -19 6429
1/3/1988 1988 1 3 217 3 28 15.5 -16.5 6412.5
1/4/1988 1988 1 4 218 20 26 23 -9 6403.5
1/5/1988 1988 1 5 219 17 30 23.5 -8.5 6395
1/6/1988 1988 1 6 220 15 35 25 -7 6388
1/7/1988 1988 1 7 221 7 30 18.5 -13.5 6374.5
1/8/1988 1988 1 8 222 10 30 20 -12 6362.5
1/9/1988 1988 1 9 223 10 32 21 -11 6351.5
1/10/1988 1988 1 10 224 18 32 25 -7 6344.5
1/11/1988 1988 1 11 225 18 32 25 -7 6337.5
1/12/1988 1988 1 12 226 10 42 26 -6 6331.5
1/13/1988 1988 1 13 227 0 28 14 -18 6313.5
1/14/1988 1988 1 14 228 0 35 17.5 -14.5 6299
1/15/1988 1988 1 15 229 10 23 16.5 -15.5 6283.5
1/16/1988 1988 1 16 230 10 35 22.5 -9.5 6274
1/17/1988 1988 1 17 231 22 30 26 -6 6268
1/18/1988 1988 1 18 232 25 37 31 -1 6267
1/19/1988 1988 1 19 233 -9 32 11.5 -20.5 6246.5
1/20/1988 1988 1 20 234 -20 25 2.5 -29.5 6217
1/21/1988 1988 1 21 235 -5 30 12.5 -19.5 6197.5
1/22/1988 1988 1 22 236 -12 20 4 -28 6169.5
1/23/1988 1988 1 23 237 -3 34 15.5 -16.5 6153
1/24/1988 1988 1 24 238 -11 35 12 -20 6133
1/25/1988 1988 1 25 239 -9 32 11.5 -20.5 6112.5
1/26/1988 1988 1 26 240 -7 30 11.5 -20.5 6092
1/27/1988 1988 1 27 241 -2 30 14 -18 6074
1/28/1988 1988 1 28 242 0 35 17.5 -14.5 6059.5
1/29/1988 1988 1 29 243 16 41 28.5 -3.5 6056
1/30/1988 1988 1 30 244 3 36 19.5 -12.5 6043.5
1/31/1988 1988 1 31 245 12 35 23.5 -8.5 6035
2/1/1988 1988 2 1 246 10 37 23.5 -8.5 6026.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
2/2/1988 1988 2 2 247 20 38 29 -3 6023.5
2/3/1988 1988 2 3 248 10 42 26 -6 6017.5
2/4/1988 1988 2 4 249 -1 38 18.5 -13.5 6004
2/5/1988 1988 2 5 250 -1 43 21 -11 5993
2/6/1988 1988 2 6 251 -1 32 15.5 -16.5 5976.5
2/7/1988 1988 2 7 252 2 40 21 -11 5965.5
2/8/1988 1988 2 8 253 15 43 29 -3 5962.5
2/9/1988 1988 2 9 254 8 37 22.5 -9.5 5953
2/10/1988 1988 2 10 255 12 45 28.5 -3.5 5949.5
2/11/1988 1988 2 11 256 15 50 32.5 0.5 5950
2/12/1988 1988 2 12 257 17 45 31 -1 5949
2/13/1988 1988 2 13 258 17 46 31.5 -0.5 5948.5
2/14/1988 1988 2 14 259 19 45 32 0 5948.5
2/15/1988 1988 2 15 260 19 45 32 0 5948.5
2/16/1988 1988 2 16 261 21 44 32.5 0.5 5949
2/17/1988 1988 2 17 262 14 43 28.5 -3.5 5945.5
2/18/1988 1988 2 18 263 28 35 31.5 -0.5 5945
2/19/1988 1988 2 19 264 18 46 32 0 5945
2/20/1988 1988 2 20 265 20 51 35.5 3.5 5948.5
2/21/1988 1988 2 21 266 22 51 36.5 4.5 5953
2/22/1988 1988 2 22 267 20 57 38.5 6.5 5959.5
2/23/1988 1988 2 23 268 20 56 38 6 5965.5
2/24/1988 1988 2 24 269 22 55 38.5 6.5 5972
2/25/1988 1988 2 25 270 22 55 38.5 6.5 5978.5
2/26/1988 1988 2 26 271 22 60 41 9 5987.5
2/27/1988 1988 2 27 272 36 44 40 8 5995.5
2/28/1988 1988 2 28 273 40 57 48.5 16.5 6012
2/29/1988 1988 2 29 274 37 56 46.5 14.5 6026.5
3/1/1988 1988 3 1 275 32 55 43.5 11.5 6038
3/2/1988 1988 3 2 276 27 55 41 9 6047
3/3/1988 1988 3 3 277 32 58 45 13 6060
3/4/1988 1988 3 4 278 35 60 47.5 15.5 6075.5
3/5/1988 1988 3 5 279 26 60 43 11 6086.5
3/6/1988 1988 3 6 280 32 63 47.5 15.5 6102
3/7/1988 1988 3 7 281 30 45 37.5 5.5 6107.5
3/8/1988 1988 3 8 282 17 54 35.5 3.5 6111
3/9/1988 1988 3 9 283 22 65 43.5 11.5 6122.5
3/10/1988 1988 3 10 284 32 40 36 4 6126.5
3/11/1988 1988 3 11 285 33 42 37.5 5.5 6132
3/12/1988 1988 3 12 286 30 44 37 5 6137
3/13/1988 1988 3 13 287 19 44 31.5 -0.5 6136.5
3/14/1988 1988 3 14 288 18 49 33.5 1.5 6138
3/15/1988 1988 3 15 289 20 50 35 3 6141
3/16/1988 1988 3 16 290 30 39 34.5 2.5 6143.5
3/17/1988 1988 3 17 291 28 46 37 5 6148.5
3/18/1988 1988 3 18 292 21 54 37.5 5.5 6154
3/19/1988 1988 3 19 293 31 60 45.5 13.5 6167.5
3/20/1988 1988 3 20 294 30 65 47.5 15.5 6183
3/21/1988 1988 3 21 295 29 60 44.5 12.5 6195.5
3/22/1988 1988 3 22 296 39 65 52 20 6215.5
3/23/1988 1988 3 23 297 27 76 51.5 19.5 6235
3/24/1988 1988 3 24 298 41 47 44 12 6247
3/25/1988 1988 3 25 299 34 70 52 20 6267
3/26/1988 1988 3 26 300 35 75 55 23 6290
3/27/1988 1988 3 27 301 40 80 60 28 6318
3/28/1988 1988 3 28 302 30 42 36 4 6322
3/29/1988 1988 3 29 303 20 58 39 7 6329
3/30/1988 1988 3 30 304 32 37 34.5 2.5 6331.5
3/31/1988 1988 3 31 305 32 49 40.5 8.5 6340
4/1/1988 1988 4 1 306 38 61 49.5 17.5 6357.5
4/2/1988 1988 4 2 307 29 72 50.5 18.5 6376
4/3/1988 1988 4 3 308 58 77 67.5 35.5 6411.5
4/4/1988 1988 4 4 309 43 75 59 27 6438.5
4/5/1988 1988 4 5 310 44 66 55 23 6461.5
4/6/1988 1988 4 6 311 50 75 62.5 30.5 6492
4/7/1988 1988 4 7 312 44 82 63 31 6523
4/8/1988 1988 4 8 313 45 59 52 20 6543
4/9/1988 1988 4 9 314 37 58 47.5 15.5 6558.5
4/10/1988 1988 4 10 315 38 67 52.5 20.5 6579
4/11/1988 1988 4 11 316 45 74 59.5 27.5 6606.5
4/12/1988 1988 4 12 317 54 83 68.5 36.5 6643
4/13/1988 1988 4 13 318 50 83 66.5 34.5 6677.5
4/14/1988 1988 4 14 319 52 67 59.5 27.5 6705
4/15/1988 1988 4 15 320 50 72 61 29 6734
4/16/1988 1988 4 16 321 50 59 54.5 22.5 6756.5
4/17/1988 1988 4 17 322 50 60 55 23 6779.5
4/18/1988 1988 4 18 323 47 52 49.5 17.5 6797
4/19/1988 1988 4 19 324 45 67 56 24 6821
4/20/1988 1988 4 20 325 50 69 59.5 27.5 6848.5
4/21/1988 1988 4 21 326 47 52 49.5 17.5 6866
4/22/1988 1988 4 22 327 42 65 53.5 21.5 6887.5
4/23/1988 1988 4 23 328 47 63 55 23 6910.5
4/24/1988 1988 4 24 329 57 66 61.5 29.5 6940
4/25/1988 1988 4 25 330 48 68 58 26 6966
4/26/1988 1988 4 26 331 57 68 62.5 30.5 6996.5
4/27/1988 1988 4 27 332 58 80 69 37 7033.5
4/28/1988 1988 4 28 333 50 75 62.5 30.5 7064
4/29/1988 1988 4 29 334 55 82 68.5 36.5 7100.5
4/30/1988 1988 4 30 335 65 80 72.5 40.5 7141
5/1/1988 1988 5 1 336 40 50 45 13 7154
5/2/1988 1988 5 2 337 52 60 56 24 7178
5/3/1988 1988 5 3 338 50 70 60 28 7206
5/4/1988 1988 5 4 339 50 79 64.5 32.5 7238.5
5/5/1988 1988 5 5 340 63 85 74 42 7280.5
5/6/1988 1988 5 6 341 45 55 50 18 7298.5
5/7/1988 1988 5 7 342 55 61 58 26 7324.5
5/8/1988 1988 5 8 343 48 70 59 27 7351.5
5/9/1988 1988 5 9 344 48 77 62.5 30.5 7382
5/10/1988 1988 5 10 345 52 81 66.5 34.5 7416.5
5/11/1988 1988 5 11 346 57 82 69.5 37.5 7454
5/12/1988 1988 5 12 347 62 93 77.5 45.5 7499.5
5/13/1988 1988 5 13 348 70 93 81.5 49.5 7549
5/14/1988 1988 5 14 349 58 91 74.5 42.5 7591.5
5/15/1988 1988 5 15 350 66 92 79 47 7638.5
5/16/1988 1988 5 16 351 72 91 81.5 49.5 7688
5/17/1988 1988 5 17 352 58 72 65 33 7721
5/18/1988 1988 5 18 353 55 74 64.5 32.5 7753.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
5/19/1988 1988 5 19 354 53 72 62.5 30.5 7784
5/20/1988 1988 5 20 355 56 72 64 32 7816
5/21/1988 1988 5 21 356 60 80 70 38 7854
5/22/1988 1988 5 22 357 64 75 69.5 37.5 7891.5
5/23/1988 1988 5 23 358 62 85 73.5 41.5 7933
5/24/1988 1988 5 24 359 62 82 72 40 7973
5/25/1988 1988 5 25 360 67 91 79 47 8020
5/26/1988 1988 5 26 361 73 94 83.5 51.5 8071.5
5/27/1988 1988 5 27 362 71 92 81.5 49.5 8121
5/28/1988 1988 5 28 363 70 93 81.5 49.5 8170.5
5/29/1988 1988 5 29 364 47 83 65 33 8203.5
5/30/1988 1988 5 30 365 48 58 53 21 8224.5
5/31/1988 1988 5 31 366 47 67 57 25 8249.5
6/1/1988 1988 6 1 1 53 80 66.5 34.5 34.5
6/2/1988 1988 6 2 2 64 90 77 45 79.5
6/3/1988 1988 6 3 3 70 87 78.5 46.5 126
6/4/1988 1988 6 4 4 90 100 95 63 189
6/5/1988 1988 6 5 5 72 96 84 52 241
6/6/1988 1988 6 6 6 74 92 83 51 292
6/7/1988 1988 6 7 7 76 92 84 52 344
6/8/1988 1988 6 8 8 65 91 78 46 390
6/9/1988 1988 6 9 9 85 94 89.5 57.5 447.5
6/10/1988 1988 6 10 10 67 96 81.5 49.5 497
6/11/1988 1988 6 11 11 71 94 82.5 50.5 547.5
6/12/1988 1988 6 12 12 68 90 79 47 594.5
6/13/1988 1988 6 13 13 70 87 78.5 46.5 641
6/14/1988 1988 6 14 14 65 94 79.5 47.5 688.5
6/15/1988 1988 6 15 15 68 100 84 52 740.5
6/16/1988 1988 6 16 16 70 99 84.5 52.5 793
6/17/1988 1988 6 17 17 72 90 81 49 842
6/18/1988 1988 6 18 18 70 95 82.5 50.5 892.5
6/19/1988 1988 6 19 19 80 103 91.5 59.5 952
6/20/1988 1988 6 20 20 70 95 82.5 50.5 1002.5
6/21/1988 1988 6 21 21 72 103 87.5 55.5 1058
6/22/1988 1988 6 22 22 77 105 91 59 1117
6/23/1988 1988 6 23 23 82 104 93 61 1178
6/24/1988 1988 6 24 24 84 104 94 62 1240
6/25/1988 1988 6 25 25 80 105 92.5 60.5 1300.5
6/26/1988 1988 6 26 26 72 90 81 49 1349.5
6/27/1988 1988 6 27 27 75 92 83.5 51.5 1401
6/28/1988 1988 6 28 28 67 87 77 45 1446
6/29/1988 1988 6 29 29 70 96 83 51 1497
6/30/1988 1988 6 30 30 72 92 82 50 1547
7/1/1988 1988 7 1 31 67 97 82 50 1597
7/2/1988 1988 7 2 32 70 100 85 53 1650
7/3/1988 1988 7 3 33 69 97 83 51 1701
7/4/1988 1988 7 4 34 64 87 75.5 43.5 1744.5
7/5/1988 1988 7 5 35 72 98 85 53 1797.5
7/6/1988 1988 7 6 36 75 100 87.5 55.5 1853
7/7/1988 1988 7 7 37 78 99 88.5 56.5 1909.5
7/8/1988 1988 7 8 38 74 101 87.5 55.5 1965
7/9/1988 1988 7 9 39 74 97 85.5 53.5 2018.5
7/10/1988 1988 7 10 40 75 97 86 54 2072.5
7/11/1988 1988 7 11 41 74 95 84.5 52.5 2125
7/12/1988 1988 7 12 42 78 100 89 57 2182
7/13/1988 1988 7 13 43 74 103 88.5 56.5 2238.5
7/14/1988 1988 7 14 44 80 106 93 61 2299.5
7/15/1988 1988 7 15 45 75 105 90 58 2357.5
7/16/1988 1988 7 16 46 76 103 89.5 57.5 2415
7/17/1988 1988 7 17 47 77 103 90 58 2473
7/18/1988 1988 7 18 48 82 96 89 57 2530
7/19/1988 1988 7 19 49 77 98 87.5 55.5 2585.5
7/20/1988 1988 7 20 50 74 100 87 55 2640.5
7/21/1988 1988 7 21 51 70 104 87 55 2695.5
7/22/1988 1988 7 22 52 76 106 91 59 2754.5
7/23/1988 1988 7 23 53 73 87 80 48 2802.5
7/24/1988 1988 7 24 54 72 104 88 56 2858.5
7/25/1988 1988 7 25 55 82 96 89 57 2915.5
7/26/1988 1988 7 26 56 80 94 87 55 2970.5
7/27/1988 1988 7 27 57 74 94 84 52 3022.5
7/28/1988 1988 7 28 58 85 89 87 55 3077.5
7/29/1988 1988 7 29 59 83 97 90 58 3135.5
7/30/1988 1988 7 30 60 80 97 88.5 56.5 3192
7/31/1988 1988 7 31 61 80 97 88.5 56.5 3248.5
8/1/1988 1988 8 1 62 80 97 88.5 56.5 3305
8/2/1988 1988 8 2 63 75 104 89.5 57.5 3362.5
8/3/1988 1988 8 3 64 75 95 85 53 3415.5
8/4/1988 1988 8 4 65 69 91 80 48 3463.5
8/5/1988 1988 8 5 66 82 98 90 58 3521.5
8/6/1988 1988 8 6 67 70 90 80 48 3569.5
8/7/1988 1988 8 7 68 66 95 80.5 48.5 3618
8/8/1988 1988 8 8 69 65 91 78 46 3664
8/9/1988 1988 8 9 70 71 96 83.5 51.5 3715.5
8/10/1988 1988 8 10 71 77 95 86 54 3769.5
8/11/1988 1988 8 11 72 58 93 75.5 43.5 3813
8/12/1988 1988 8 12 73 62 89 75.5 43.5 3856.5
8/13/1988 1988 8 13 74 65 93 79 47 3903.5
8/14/1988 1988 8 14 75 58 100 79 47 3950.5
8/15/1988 1988 8 15 76 78 92 85 53 4003.5
8/16/1988 1988 8 16 77 68 95 81.5 49.5 4053
8/17/1988 1988 8 17 78 70 93 81.5 49.5 4102.5
8/18/1988 1988 8 18 79 70 97 83.5 51.5 4154
8/19/1988 1988 8 19 80 69 98 83.5 51.5 4205.5
8/20/1988 1988 8 20 81 69 97 83 51 4256.5
8/21/1988 1988 8 21 82 68 97 82.5 50.5 4307
8/22/1988 1988 8 22 83 70 88 79 47 4354
8/23/1988 1988 8 23 84 69 97 83 51 4405
8/24/1988 1988 8 24 85 82 98 90 58 4463
8/25/1988 1988 8 25 86 76 94 85 53 4516
8/26/1988 1988 8 26 87 67 94 80.5 48.5 4564.5
8/27/1988 1988 8 27 88 66 84 75 43 4607.5
8/28/1988 1988 8 28 89 76 96 86 54 4661.5
8/29/1988 1988 8 29 90 72 92 82 50 4711.5
8/30/1988 1988 8 30 91 65 90 77.5 45.5 4757
8/31/1988 1988 8 31 92 67 91 79 47 4804
9/1/1988 1988 9 1 93 67 90 78.5 46.5 4850.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
9/2/1988 1988 9 2 94 65 91 78 46 4896.5
9/3/1988 1988 9 3 95 62 93 77.5 45.5 4942
9/4/1988 1988 9 4 96 68 87 77.5 45.5 4987.5
9/5/1988 1988 9 5 97 77 93 85 53 5040.5
9/6/1988 1988 9 6 98 78 93 85.5 53.5 5094
9/7/1988 1988 9 7 99 66 95 80.5 48.5 5142.5
9/8/1988 1988 9 8 100 70 94 82 50 5192.5
9/9/1988 1988 9 9 101 75 92 83.5 51.5 5244
9/10/1988 1988 9 10 102 65 84 74.5 42.5 5286.5
9/11/1988 1988 9 11 103 62 70 66 34 5320.5
9/12/1988 1988 9 12 104 45 52 48.5 16.5 5337
9/13/1988 1988 9 13 105 37 60 48.5 16.5 5353.5
9/14/1988 1988 9 14 106 45 69 57 25 5378.5
9/15/1988 1988 9 15 107 48 78 63 31 5409.5
9/16/1988 1988 9 16 108 62 82 72 40 5449.5
9/17/1988 1988 9 17 109 46 85 65.5 33.5 5483
9/18/1988 1988 9 18 110 54 65 59.5 27.5 5510.5
9/19/1988 1988 9 19 111 28 72 50 18 5528.5
9/20/1988 1988 9 20 112 48 88 68 36 5564.5
9/21/1988 1988 9 21 113 52 66 59 27 5591.5
9/22/1988 1988 9 22 114 58 68 63 31 5622.5
9/23/1988 1988 9 23 115 45 72 58.5 26.5 5649
9/24/1988 1988 9 24 116 60 82 71 39 5688
9/25/1988 1988 9 25 117 62 84 73 41 5729
9/26/1988 1988 9 26 118 47 57 52 20 5749
9/27/1988 1988 9 27 119 45 81 63 31 5780
9/28/1988 1988 9 28 120 63 72 67.5 35.5 5815.5
9/29/1988 1988 9 29 121 38 72 55 23 5838.5
9/30/1988 1988 9 30 122 45 81 63 31 5869.5
10/1/1988 1988 10 1 123 45 82 63.5 31.5 5901
10/2/1988 1988 10 2 124 43 80 61.5 29.5 5930.5
10/3/1988 1988 10 3 125 60 85 72.5 40.5 5971
10/4/1988 1988 10 4 126 56 85 70.5 38.5 6009.5
10/5/1988 1988 10 5 127 65 81 73 41 6050.5
10/6/1988 1988 10 6 128 55 74 64.5 32.5 6083
10/7/1988 1988 10 7 129 45 65 55 23 6106
10/8/1988 1988 10 8 130 39 77 58 26 6132
10/9/1988 1988 10 9 131 42 74 58 26 6158
10/10/1988 1988 10 10 132 38 70 54 22 6180
10/11/1988 1988 10 11 133 50 72 61 29 6209
10/12/1988 1988 10 12 134 50 70 60 28 6237
10/13/1988 1988 10 13 135 37 70 53.5 21.5 6258.5
10/14/1988 1988 10 14 136 45 73 59 27 6285.5
10/15/1988 1988 10 15 137 54 76 65 33 6318.5
10/16/1988 1988 10 16 138 40 76 58 26 6344.5
10/17/1988 1988 10 17 139 72 80 76 44 6388.5
10/18/1988 1988 10 18 140 55 80 67.5 35.5 6424
10/19/1988 1988 10 19 141 52 82 67 35 6459
10/20/1988 1988 10 20 142 35 74 54.5 22.5 6481.5
10/21/1988 1988 10 21 143 35 71 53 21 6502.5
10/22/1988 1988 10 22 144 36 70 53 21 6523.5
10/23/1988 1988 10 23 145 59 81 70 38 6561.5
10/24/1988 1988 10 24 146 35 77 56 24 6585.5
10/25/1988 1988 10 25 147 35 75 55 23 6608.5
10/26/1988 1988 10 26 148 33 72 52.5 20.5 6629
10/27/1988 1988 10 27 149 37 75 56 24 6653
10/28/1988 1988 10 28 150 38 73 55.5 23.5 6676.5
10/29/1988 1988 10 29 151 45 72 58.5 26.5 6703
10/30/1988 1988 10 30 152 38 69 53.5 21.5 6724.5
10/31/1988 1988 10 31 153 44 70 57 25 6749.5
11/1/1988 1988 11 1 154 36 66 51 19 6768.5
11/2/1988 1988 11 2 155 46 74 60 28 6796.5
11/3/1988 1988 11 3 156 38 78 58 26 6822.5
11/4/1988 1988 11 4 157 55 62 58.5 26.5 6849
11/5/1988 1988 11 5 158 32 65 48.5 16.5 6865.5
11/6/1988 1988 11 6 159 34 64 49 17 6882.5
11/7/1988 1988 11 7 160 28 62 45 13 6895.5
11/8/1988 1988 11 8 161 35 66 50.5 18.5 6914
11/9/1988 1988 11 9 162 34 67 50.5 18.5 6932.5
11/10/1988 1988 11 10 163 48 68 58 26 6958.5
11/11/1988 1988 11 11 164 47 57 52 20 6978.5
11/12/1988 1988 11 12 165 24 43 33.5 1.5 6980
11/13/1988 1988 11 13 166 35 65 50 18 6998
11/14/1988 1988 11 14 167 38 70 54 22 7020
11/15/1988 1988 11 15 168 30 45 37.5 5.5 7025.5
11/16/1988 1988 11 16 169 15 47 31 -1 7024.5
11/17/1988 1988 11 17 170 24 43 33.5 1.5 7026
11/18/1988 1988 11 18 171 22 46 34 2 7028
11/19/1988 1988 11 19 172 12 29 20.5 -11.5 7016.5
11/20/1988 1988 11 20 173 13 50 31.5 -0.5 7016
11/21/1988 1988 11 21 174 11 49 30 -2 7014
11/22/1988 1988 11 22 175 17 50 33.5 1.5 7015.5
11/23/1988 1988 11 23 176 20 55 37.5 5.5 7021
11/24/1988 1988 11 24 177 32 45 38.5 6.5 7027.5
11/25/1988 1988 11 25 178 14 41 27.5 -4.5 7023
11/26/1988 1988 11 26 179 15 43 29 -3 7020
11/27/1988 1988 11 27 180 16 43 29.5 -2.5 7017.5
11/28/1988 1988 11 28 181 10 40 25 -7 7010.5
11/29/1988 1988 11 29 182 10 45 27.5 -4.5 7006
11/30/1988 1988 11 30 183 13 45 29 -3 7003
12/1/1988 1988 12 1 184 20 46 33 1 7004
12/2/1988 1988 12 2 185 18 50 34 2 7006
12/3/1988 1988 12 3 186 8 52 30 -2 7004
12/4/1988 1988 12 4 187 10 48 29 -3 7001
12/5/1988 1988 12 5 188 9 48 28.5 -3.5 6997.5
12/6/1988 1988 12 6 189 10 45 27.5 -4.5 6993
12/7/1988 1988 12 7 190 18 50 34 2 6995
12/8/1988 1988 12 8 191 18 47 32.5 0.5 6995.5
12/9/1988 1988 12 9 192 8 45 26.5 -5.5 6990
12/10/1988 1988 12 10 193 8 45 26.5 -5.5 6984.5
12/11/1988 1988 12 11 194 18 45 31.5 -0.5 6984
12/12/1988 1988 12 12 195 11 51 31 -1 6983
12/13/1988 1988 12 13 196 11 46 28.5 -3.5 6979.5
12/14/1988 1988 12 14 197 9 52 30.5 -1.5 6978
12/15/1988 1988 12 15 198 19 43 31 -1 6977
12/16/1988 1988 12 16 199 8 47 27.5 -4.5 6972.5
12/17/1988 1988 12 17 200 24 47 35.5 3.5 6976
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
12/18/1988 1988 12 18 201 20 47 33.5 1.5 6977.5
12/19/1988 1988 12 19 202 21 35 28 -4 6973.5
12/20/1988 1988 12 20 203 16 48 32 0 6973.5
12/21/1988 1988 12 21 204 32 46 39 7 6980.5
12/22/1988 1988 12 22 205 13 46 29.5 -2.5 6978
12/23/1988 1988 12 23 206 15 39 27 -5 6973
12/24/1988 1988 12 24 207 18 25 21.5 -10.5 6962.5
12/25/1988 1988 12 25 208 22 40 31 -1 6961.5
12/26/1988 1988 12 26 209 3 36 19.5 -12.5 6949
12/27/1988 1988 12 27 210 -5 32 13.5 -18.5 6930.5
12/28/1988 1988 12 28 211 2 26 14 -18 6912.5
12/29/1988 1988 12 29 212 -7 25 9 -23 6889.5
12/30/1988 1988 12 30 213 -3 30 13.5 -18.5 6871
12/31/1988 1988 12 31 214 19 30 24.5 -7.5 6863.5
1/1/1989 1989 1 1 215 -1 30 14.5 -17.5 6846
1/2/1989 1989 1 2 216 -2 32 15 -17 6829
1/3/1989 1989 1 3 217 0 37 18.5 -13.5 6815.5
1/4/1989 1989 1 4 218 15 25 20 -12 6803.5
1/5/1989 1989 1 5 219 22 37 29.5 -2.5 6801
1/6/1989 1989 1 6 220 12 37 24.5 -7.5 6793.5
1/7/1989 1989 1 7 221 -8 27 9.5 -22.5 6771
1/8/1989 1989 1 8 222 -7 27 10 -22 6749
1/9/1989 1989 1 9 223 0 30 15 -17 6732
1/10/1989 1989 1 10 224 -6 25 9.5 -22.5 6709.5
1/11/1989 1989 1 11 225 2 35 18.5 -13.5 6696
1/12/1989 1989 1 12 226 -12 25 6.5 -25.5 6670.5
1/13/1989 1989 1 13 227 -15 24 4.5 -27.5 6643
1/14/1989 1989 1 14 228 -14 21 3.5 -28.5 6614.5
1/15/1989 1989 1 15 229 -2 25 11.5 -20.5 6594
1/16/1989 1989 1 16 230 -3 29 13 -19 6575
1/17/1989 1989 1 17 231 -9 25 8 -24 6551
1/18/1989 1989 1 18 232 -7 33 13 -19 6532
1/19/1989 1989 1 19 233 -5 38 16.5 -15.5 6516.5
1/20/1989 1989 1 20 234 -4 34 15 -17 6499.5
1/21/1989 1989 1 21 235 -4 32 14 -18 6481.5
1/22/1989 1989 1 22 236 14 35 24.5 -7.5 6474
1/23/1989 1989 1 23 237 7 35 21 -11 6463
1/24/1989 1989 1 24 238 18 42 30 -2 6461
1/25/1989 1989 1 25 239 11 44 27.5 -4.5 6456.5
1/26/1989 1989 1 26 240 1 37 19 -13 6443.5
1/27/1989 1989 1 27 241 9 37 23 -9 6434.5
1/28/1989 1989 1 28 242 5 45 25 -7 6427.5
1/29/1989 1989 1 29 243 7 42 24.5 -7.5 6420
1/30/1989 1989 1 30 244 12 45 28.5 -3.5 6416.5
1/31/1989 1989 1 31 245 11 42 26.5 -5.5 6411
2/1/1989 1989 2 1 246 26 57 41.5 9.5 6420.5
2/2/1989 1989 2 2 247 45 66 55.5 23.5 6444
2/3/1989 1989 2 3 248 45 50 47.5 15.5 6459.5
2/4/1989 1989 2 4 249 15 40 27.5 -4.5 6455
2/5/1989 1989 2 5 250 -23 17 -3 -35 6420
2/6/1989 1989 2 6 251 -32 16 -8 -40 6380
2/7/1989 1989 2 7 252 -30 22 -4 -36 6344
2/8/1989 1989 2 8 253 -22 22 0 -32 6312
2/9/1989 1989 2 9 254 14 27 20.5 -11.5 6300.5
2/10/1989 1989 2 10 255 22 37 29.5 -2.5 6298
2/11/1989 1989 2 11 256 28 40 34 2 6300
2/12/1989 1989 2 12 257 19 48 33.5 1.5 6301.5
2/13/1989 1989 2 13 258 12 45 28.5 -3.5 6298
2/14/1989 1989 2 14 259 17 43 30 -2 6296
2/15/1989 1989 2 15 260 5 43 24 -8 6288
2/16/1989 1989 2 16 261 6 40 23 -9 6279
2/17/1989 1989 2 17 262 14 47 30.5 -1.5 6277.5
2/18/1989 1989 2 18 263 25 46 35.5 3.5 6281
2/19/1989 1989 2 19 264 22 45 33.5 1.5 6282.5
2/20/1989 1989 2 20 265 36 47 41.5 9.5 6292
2/21/1989 1989 2 21 266 23 50 36.5 4.5 6296.5
2/22/1989 1989 2 22 267 24 53 38.5 6.5 6303
2/23/1989 1989 2 23 268 25 56 40.5 8.5 6311.5
2/24/1989 1989 2 24 269 28 58 43 11 6322.5
2/25/1989 1989 2 25 270 40 65 52.5 20.5 6343
2/26/1989 1989 2 26 271 32 64 48 16 6359
2/27/1989 1989 2 27 272 38 58 48 16 6375
2/28/1989 1989 2 28 273 22 58 40 8 6383
3/1/1989 1989 3 1 274 22 67 44.5 12.5 6395.5
3/2/1989 1989 3 2 275 46 55 50.5 18.5 6414
3/3/1989 1989 3 3 276 28 38 33 1 6415
3/4/1989 1989 3 4 277 22 39 30.5 -1.5 6413.5
3/5/1989 1989 3 5 278 15 46 30.5 -1.5 6412
3/6/1989 1989 3 6 279 27 57 42 10 6422
3/7/1989 1989 3 7 280 35 64 49.5 17.5 6439.5
3/8/1989 1989 3 8 281 38 72 55 23 6462.5
3/9/1989 1989 3 9 282 60 80 70 38 6500.5
3/10/1989 1989 3 10 283 35 84 59.5 27.5 6528
3/11/1989 1989 3 11 284 45 76 60.5 28.5 6556.5
3/12/1989 1989 3 12 285 48 78 63 31 6587.5
3/13/1989 1989 3 13 286 47 75 61 29 6616.5
3/14/1989 1989 3 14 287 35 52 43.5 11.5 6628
3/15/1989 1989 3 15 288 24 67 45.5 13.5 6641.5
3/16/1989 1989 3 16 289 32 72 52 20 6661.5
3/17/1989 1989 3 17 290 36 57 46.5 14.5 6676
3/18/1989 1989 3 18 291 32 65 48.5 16.5 6692.5
3/19/1989 1989 3 19 292 40 70 55 23 6715.5
3/20/1989 1989 3 20 293 38 54 46 14 6729.5
3/21/1989 1989 3 21 294 24 64 44 12 6741.5
3/22/1989 1989 3 22 295 33 58 45.5 13.5 6755
3/23/1989 1989 3 23 296 40 80 60 28 6783
3/24/1989 1989 3 24 297 47 73 60 28 6811
3/25/1989 1989 3 25 298 56 72 64 32 6843
3/26/1989 1989 3 26 299 45 64 54.5 22.5 6865.5
3/27/1989 1989 3 27 300 34 64 49 17 6882.5
3/28/1989 1989 3 28 301 34 76 55 23 6905.5
3/29/1989 1989 3 29 302 42 64 53 21 6926.5
3/30/1989 1989 3 30 303 32 56 44 12 6938.5
3/31/1989 1989 3 31 304 33 75 54 22 6960.5
4/1/1989 1989 4 1 305 42 64 53 21 6981.5
4/2/1989 1989 4 2 306 35 74 54.5 22.5 7004
4/3/1989 1989 4 3 307 43 68 55.5 23.5 7027.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
4/4/1989 1989 4 4 308 37 67 52 20 7047.5
4/5/1989 1989 4 5 309 51 79 65 33 7080.5
4/6/1989 1989 4 6 310 44 84 64 32 7112.5
4/7/1989 1989 4 7 311 47 84 65.5 33.5 7146
4/8/1989 1989 4 8 312 53 77 65 33 7179
4/9/1989 1989 4 9 313 69 75 72 40 7219
4/10/1989 1989 4 10 314 39 63 51 19 7238
4/11/1989 1989 4 11 315 54 73 63.5 31.5 7269.5
4/12/1989 1989 4 12 316 46 68 57 25 7294.5
4/13/1989 1989 4 13 317 37 72 54.5 22.5 7317
4/14/1989 1989 4 14 318 41 80 60.5 28.5 7345.5
4/15/1989 1989 4 15 319 72 84 78 46 7391.5
4/16/1989 1989 4 16 320 73 84 78.5 46.5 7438
4/17/1989 1989 4 17 321 56 85 70.5 38.5 7476.5
4/18/1989 1989 4 18 322 52 89 70.5 38.5 7515
4/19/1989 1989 4 19 323 49 97 73 41 7556
4/20/1989 1989 4 20 324 57 90 73.5 41.5 7597.5
4/21/1989 1989 4 21 325 73 90 81.5 49.5 7647
4/22/1989 1989 4 22 326 70 87 78.5 46.5 7693.5
4/23/1989 1989 4 23 327 65 80 72.5 40.5 7734
4/24/1989 1989 4 24 328 60 79 69.5 37.5 7771.5
4/25/1989 1989 4 25 329 60 74 67 35 7806.5
4/26/1989 1989 4 26 330 44 60 52 20 7826.5
4/27/1989 1989 4 27 331 45 70 57.5 25.5 7852
4/28/1989 1989 4 28 332 40 70 55 23 7875
4/29/1989 1989 4 29 333 40 66 53 21 7896
4/30/1989 1989 4 30 334 42 72 57 25 7921
5/1/1989 1989 5 1 335 37 80 58.5 26.5 7947.5
5/2/1989 1989 5 2 336 59 82 70.5 38.5 7986
5/3/1989 1989 5 3 337 76 79 77.5 45.5 8031.5
5/4/1989 1989 5 4 338 55 80 67.5 35.5 8067
5/5/1989 1989 5 5 339 48 86 67 35 8102
5/6/1989 1989 5 6 340 56 94 75 43 8145
5/7/1989 1989 5 7 341 57 98 77.5 45.5 8190.5
5/8/1989 1989 5 8 342 65 98 81.5 49.5 8240
5/9/1989 1989 5 9 343 66 85 75.5 43.5 8283.5
5/10/1989 1989 5 10 344 70 86 78 46 8329.5
5/11/1989 1989 5 11 345 54 82 68 36 8365.5
5/12/1989 1989 5 12 346 43 59 51 19 8384.5
5/13/1989 1989 5 13 347 37 70 53.5 21.5 8406
5/14/1989 1989 5 14 348 50 68 59 27 8433
5/15/1989 1989 5 15 349 50 68 59 27 8460
5/16/1989 1989 5 16 350 48 69 58.5 26.5 8486.5
5/17/1989 1989 5 17 351 67 77 72 40 8526.5
5/18/1989 1989 5 18 352 55 86 70.5 38.5 8565
5/19/1989 1989 5 19 353 57 77 67 35 8600
5/20/1989 1989 5 20 354 54 88 71 39 8639
5/21/1989 1989 5 21 355 64 90 77 45 8684
5/22/1989 1989 5 22 356 63 98 80.5 48.5 8732.5
5/23/1989 1989 5 23 357 75 95 85 53 8785.5
5/24/1989 1989 5 24 358 60 80 70 38 8823.5
5/25/1989 1989 5 25 359 49 72 60.5 28.5 8852
5/26/1989 1989 5 26 360 67 80 73.5 41.5 8893.5
5/27/1989 1989 5 27 361 57 90 73.5 41.5 8935
5/28/1989 1989 5 28 362 74 90 82 50 8985
5/29/1989 1989 5 29 363 71 85 78 46 9031
5/30/1989 1989 5 30 364 53 76 64.5 32.5 9063.5
5/31/1989 1989 5 31 365 52 74 63 31 9094.5
6/1/1989 1989 6 1 1 57 83 70 38 38
6/2/1989 1989 6 2 2 55 88 71.5 39.5 77.5
6/3/1989 1989 6 3 3 55 84 69.5 37.5 115
6/4/1989 1989 6 4 4 56 82 69 37 152
6/5/1989 1989 6 5 5 69 88 78.5 46.5 198.5
6/6/1989 1989 6 6 6 65 85 75 43 241.5
6/7/1989 1989 6 7 7 67 90 78.5 46.5 288
6/8/1989 1989 6 8 8 65 86 75.5 43.5 331.5
6/9/1989 1989 6 9 9 60 85 72.5 40.5 372
6/10/1989 1989 6 10 10 63 82 72.5 40.5 412.5
6/11/1989 1989 6 11 11 65 89 77 45 457.5
6/12/1989 1989 6 12 12 60 87 73.5 41.5 499
6/13/1989 1989 6 13 13 67 86 76.5 44.5 543.5
6/14/1989 1989 6 14 14 70 92 81 49 592.5
6/15/1989 1989 6 15 15 70 99 84.5 52.5 645
6/16/1989 1989 6 16 16 75 98 86.5 54.5 699.5
6/17/1989 1989 6 17 17 75 93 84 52 751.5
6/18/1989 1989 6 18 18 73 103 88 56 807.5
6/19/1989 1989 6 19 19 81 100 90.5 58.5 866
6/20/1989 1989 6 20 20 67 98 82.5 50.5 916.5
6/21/1989 1989 6 21 21 57 75 66 34 950.5
6/22/1989 1989 6 22 22 65 81 73 41 991.5
6/23/1989 1989 6 23 23 62 82 72 40 1031.5
6/24/1989 1989 6 24 24 67 86 76.5 44.5 1076
6/25/1989 1989 6 25 25 65 85 75 43 1119
6/26/1989 1989 6 26 26 68 86 77 45 1164
6/27/1989 1989 6 27 27 77 92 84.5 52.5 1216.5
6/28/1989 1989 6 28 28 65 93 79 47 1263.5
6/29/1989 1989 6 29 29 65 98 81.5 49.5 1313
6/30/1989 1989 6 30 30 66 104 85 53 1366
7/1/1989 1989 7 1 31 83 90 86.5 54.5 1420.5
7/2/1989 1989 7 2 32 69 101 85 53 1473.5
7/3/1989 1989 7 3 33 68 103 85.5 53.5 1527
7/4/1989 1989 7 4 34 63 106 84.5 52.5 1579.5
7/5/1989 1989 7 5 35 65 103 84 52 1631.5
7/6/1989 1989 7 6 36 68 108 88 56 1687.5
7/7/1989 1989 7 7 37 82 103 92.5 60.5 1748
7/8/1989 1989 7 8 38 73 110 91.5 59.5 1807.5
7/9/1989 1989 7 9 39 80 105 92.5 60.5 1868
7/10/1989 1989 7 10 40 70 86 78 46 1914
7/11/1989 1989 7 11 41 72 97 84.5 52.5 1966.5
7/12/1989 1989 7 12 42 68 86 77 45 2011.5
7/13/1989 1989 7 13 43 70 94 82 50 2061.5
7/14/1989 1989 7 14 44 68 96 82 50 2111.5
7/15/1989 1989 7 15 45 90 100 95 63 2174.5
7/16/1989 1989 7 16 46 82 99 90.5 58.5 2233
7/17/1989 1989 7 17 47 70 100 85 53 2286
7/18/1989 1989 7 18 48 74 100 87 55 2341
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
7/19/1989 1989 7 19 49 70 104 87 55 2396
7/20/1989 1989 7 20 50 77 104 90.5 58.5 2454.5
7/21/1989 1989 7 21 51 76 106 91 59 2513.5
7/22/1989 1989 7 22 52 80 96 88 56 2569.5
7/23/1989 1989 7 23 53 67 96 81.5 49.5 2619
7/24/1989 1989 7 24 54 71 92 81.5 49.5 2668.5
7/25/1989 1989 7 25 55 60 95 77.5 45.5 2714
7/26/1989 1989 7 26 56 82 86 84 52 2766
7/27/1989 1989 7 27 57 72 95 83.5 51.5 2817.5
7/28/1989 1989 7 28 58 71 90 80.5 48.5 2866
7/29/1989 1989 7 29 59 74 95 84.5 52.5 2918.5
7/30/1989 1989 7 30 60 72 93 82.5 50.5 2969
7/31/1989 1989 7 31 61 67 103 85 53 3022
8/1/1989 1989 8 1 62 74 82 78 46 3068
8/2/1989 1989 8 2 63 65 95 80 48 3116
8/3/1989 1989 8 3 64 72 95 83.5 51.5 3167.5
8/4/1989 1989 8 4 65 75 95 85 53 3220.5
8/5/1989 1989 8 5 66 70 100 85 53 3273.5
8/6/1989 1989 8 6 67 70 104 87 55 3328.5
8/7/1989 1989 8 7 68 70 99 84.5 52.5 3381
8/8/1989 1989 8 8 69 69 100 84.5 52.5 3433.5
8/9/1989 1989 8 9 70 75 89 82 50 3483.5
8/10/1989 1989 8 10 71 68 92 80 48 3531.5
8/11/1989 1989 8 11 72 68 90 79 47 3578.5
8/12/1989 1989 8 12 73 66 94 80 48 3626.5
8/13/1989 1989 8 13 74 68 84 76 44 3670.5
8/14/1989 1989 8 14 75 69 90 79.5 47.5 3718
8/15/1989 1989 8 15 76 69 90 79.5 47.5 3765.5
8/16/1989 1989 8 16 77 62 87 74.5 42.5 3808
8/17/1989 1989 8 17 78 58 78 68 36 3844
8/18/1989 1989 8 18 79 53 79 66 34 3878
8/19/1989 1989 8 19 80 65 77 71 39 3917
8/20/1989 1989 8 20 81 60 82 71 39 3956
8/21/1989 1989 8 21 82 59 78 68.5 36.5 3992.5
8/22/1989 1989 8 22 83 60 85 72.5 40.5 4033
8/23/1989 1989 8 23 84 62 92 77 45 4078
8/24/1989 1989 8 24 85 69 85 77 45 4123
8/25/1989 1989 8 25 86 58 80 69 37 4160
8/26/1989 1989 8 26 87 58 92 75 43 4203
8/27/1989 1989 8 27 88 57 87 72 40 4243
8/28/1989 1989 8 28 89 56 92 74 42 4285
8/29/1989 1989 8 29 90 53 93 73 41 4326
8/30/1989 1989 8 30 91 62 95 78.5 46.5 4372.5
8/31/1989 1989 8 31 92 62 92 77 45 4417.5
9/1/1989 1989 9 1 93 67 94 80.5 48.5 4466
9/2/1989 1989 9 2 94 54 95 74.5 42.5 4508.5
9/3/1989 1989 9 3 95 53 94 73.5 41.5 4550
9/4/1989 1989 9 4 96 57 87 72 40 4590
9/5/1989 1989 9 5 97 60 95 77.5 45.5 4635.5
9/6/1989 1989 9 6 98 60 94 77 45 4680.5
9/7/1989 1989 9 7 99 74 86 80 48 4728.5
9/8/1989 1989 9 8 100 58 81 69.5 37.5 4766
9/9/1989 1989 9 9 101 64 82 73 41 4807
9/10/1989 1989 9 10 102 58 82 70 38 4845
9/11/1989 1989 9 11 103 55 83 69 37 4882
9/12/1989 1989 9 12 104 44 62 53 21 4903
9/13/1989 1989 9 13 105 40 75 57.5 25.5 4928.5
9/14/1989 1989 9 14 106 45 79 62 30 4958.5
9/15/1989 1989 9 15 107 48 85 66.5 34.5 4993
9/16/1989 1989 9 16 108 46 81 63.5 31.5 5024.5
9/17/1989 1989 9 17 109 70 87 78.5 46.5 5071
9/18/1989 1989 9 18 110 65 78 71.5 39.5 5110.5
9/19/1989 1989 9 19 111 62 83 72.5 40.5 5151
9/20/1989 1989 9 20 112 58 69 63.5 31.5 5182.5
9/21/1989 1989 9 21 113 44 68 56 24 5206.5
9/22/1989 1989 9 22 114 60 75 67.5 35.5 5242
9/23/1989 1989 9 23 115 43 83 63 31 5273
9/24/1989 1989 9 24 116 52 86 69 37 5310
9/25/1989 1989 9 25 117 50 88 69 37 5347
9/26/1989 1989 9 26 118 55 87 71 39 5386
9/27/1989 1989 9 27 119 55 82 68.5 36.5 5422.5
9/28/1989 1989 9 28 120 48 75 61.5 29.5 5452
9/29/1989 1989 9 29 121 50 87 68.5 36.5 5488.5
9/30/1989 1989 9 30 122 48 84 66 34 5522.5
10/1/1989 1989 10 1 123 45 78 61.5 29.5 5552
10/2/1989 1989 10 2 124 50 80 65 33 5585
10/3/1989 1989 10 3 125 53 79 66 34 5619
10/4/1989 1989 10 4 126 40 78 59 27 5646
10/5/1989 1989 10 5 127 37 74 55.5 23.5 5669.5
10/6/1989 1989 10 6 128 35 74 54.5 22.5 5692
10/7/1989 1989 10 7 129 38 70 54 22 5714
10/8/1989 1989 10 8 130 34 74 54 22 5736
10/9/1989 1989 10 9 131 35 75 55 23 5759
10/10/1989 1989 10 10 132 40 80 60 28 5787
10/11/1989 1989 10 11 133 40 81 60.5 28.5 5815.5
10/12/1989 1989 10 12 134 35 80 57.5 25.5 5841
10/13/1989 1989 10 13 135 38 86 62 30 5871
10/14/1989 1989 10 14 136 50 84 67 35 5906
10/15/1989 1989 10 15 137 53 72 62.5 30.5 5936.5
10/16/1989 1989 10 16 138 49 70 59.5 27.5 5964
10/17/1989 1989 10 17 139 40 63 51.5 19.5 5983.5
10/18/1989 1989 10 18 140 30 64 47 15 5998.5
10/19/1989 1989 10 19 141 28 68 48 16 6014.5
10/20/1989 1989 10 20 142 29 64 46.5 14.5 6029
10/21/1989 1989 10 21 143 37 64 50.5 18.5 6047.5
10/22/1989 1989 10 22 144 36 64 50 18 6065.5
10/23/1989 1989 10 23 145 46 72 59 27 6092.5
10/24/1989 1989 10 24 146 41 76 58.5 26.5 6119
10/25/1989 1989 10 25 147 48 70 59 27 6146
10/26/1989 1989 10 26 148 39 59 49 17 6163
10/27/1989 1989 10 27 149 25 63 44 12 6175
10/28/1989 1989 10 28 150 33 50 41.5 9.5 6184.5
10/29/1989 1989 10 29 151 22 50 36 4 6188.5
10/30/1989 1989 10 30 152 15 55 35 3 6191.5
10/31/1989 1989 10 31 153 14 58 36 4 6195.5
11/1/1989 1989 11 1 154 24 47 35.5 3.5 6199
11/2/1989 1989 11 2 155 12 51 31.5 -0.5 6198.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
11/3/1989 1989 11 3 156 32 57 44.5 12.5 6211
11/4/1989 1989 11 4 157 27 60 43.5 11.5 6222.5
11/5/1989 1989 11 5 158 24 70 47 15 6237.5
11/6/1989 1989 11 6 159 36 64 50 18 6255.5
11/7/1989 1989 11 7 160 37 64 50.5 18.5 6274
11/8/1989 1989 11 8 161 22 60 41 9 6283
11/9/1989 1989 11 9 162 28 46 37 5 6288
11/10/1989 1989 11 10 163 40 64 52 20 6308
11/11/1989 1989 11 11 164 42 62 52 20 6328
11/12/1989 1989 11 12 165 25 67 46 14 6342
11/13/1989 1989 11 13 166 28 70 49 17 6359
11/14/1989 1989 11 14 167 28 61 44.5 12.5 6371.5
11/15/1989 1989 11 15 168 35 51 43 11 6382.5
11/16/1989 1989 11 16 169 20 55 37.5 5.5 6388
11/17/1989 1989 11 17 170 26 55 40.5 8.5 6396.5
11/18/1989 1989 11 18 171 20 58 39 7 6403.5
11/19/1989 1989 11 19 172 20 62 41 9 6412.5
11/20/1989 1989 11 20 173 18 62 40 8 6420.5
11/21/1989 1989 11 21 174 25 64 44.5 12.5 6433
11/22/1989 1989 11 22 175 19 60 39.5 7.5 6440.5
11/23/1989 1989 11 23 176 25 59 42 10 6450.5
11/24/1989 1989 11 24 177 32 62 47 15 6465.5
11/25/1989 1989 11 25 178 29 58 43.5 11.5 6477
11/26/1989 1989 11 26 179 37 59 48 16 6493
11/27/1989 1989 11 27 180 24 42 33 1 6494
11/28/1989 1989 11 28 181 15 42 28.5 -3.5 6490.5
11/29/1989 1989 11 29 182 5 43 24 -8 6482.5
11/30/1989 1989 11 30 183 5 44 24.5 -7.5 6475
12/1/1989 1989 12 1 184 5 50 27.5 -4.5 6470.5
12/2/1989 1989 12 2 185 7 48 27.5 -4.5 6466
12/3/1989 1989 12 3 186 10 47 28.5 -3.5 6462.5
12/4/1989 1989 12 4 187 9 51 30 -2 6460.5
12/5/1989 1989 12 5 188 13 50 31.5 -0.5 6460
12/6/1989 1989 12 6 189 29 54 41.5 9.5 6469.5
12/7/1989 1989 12 7 190 15 50 32.5 0.5 6470
12/8/1989 1989 12 8 191 10 49 29.5 -2.5 6467.5
12/9/1989 1989 12 9 192 10 40 25 -7 6460.5
12/10/1989 1989 12 10 193 17 43 30 -2 6458.5
12/11/1989 1989 12 11 194 4 38 21 -11 6447.5
12/12/1989 1989 12 12 195 9 36 22.5 -9.5 6438
12/13/1989 1989 12 13 196 3 42 22.5 -9.5 6428.5
12/14/1989 1989 12 14 197 8 35 21.5 -10.5 6418
12/15/1989 1989 12 15 198 16 43 29.5 -2.5 6415.5
12/16/1989 1989 12 16 199 7 40 23.5 -8.5 6407
12/17/1989 1989 12 17 200 14 43 28.5 -3.5 6403.5
12/18/1989 1989 12 18 201 4 44 24 -8 6395.5
12/19/1989 1989 12 19 202 3 43 23 -9 6386.5
12/20/1989 1989 12 20 203 5 42 23.5 -8.5 6378
12/21/1989 1989 12 21 204 20 50 35 3 6381
12/22/1989 1989 12 22 205 11 48 29.5 -2.5 6378.5
12/23/1989 1989 12 23 206 9 47 28 -4 6374.5
12/24/1989 1989 12 24 207 9 45 27 -5 6369.5
12/25/1989 1989 12 25 208 9 45 27 -5 6364.5
12/26/1989 1989 12 26 209 5 39 22 -10 6354.5
12/27/1989 1989 12 27 210 5 40 22.5 -9.5 6345
12/28/1989 1989 12 28 211 21 42 31.5 -0.5 6344.5
12/29/1989 1989 12 29 212 18 48 33 1 6345.5
12/30/1989 1989 12 30 213 10 47 28.5 -3.5 6342
12/31/1989 1989 12 31 214 7 42 24.5 -7.5 6334.5
1/1/1990 1990 1 1 215 20 42 31 -1 6333.5
1/2/1990 1990 1 2 216 32 50 41 9 6342.5
1/3/1990 1990 1 3 217 21 40 30.5 -1.5 6341
1/4/1990 1990 1 4 218 2 38 20 -12 6329
1/5/1990 1990 1 5 219 11 38 24.5 -7.5 6321.5
1/6/1990 1990 1 6 220 2 40 21 -11 6310.5
1/7/1990 1990 1 7 221 3 38 20.5 -11.5 6299
1/8/1990 1990 1 8 222 11 40 25.5 -6.5 6292.5
1/9/1990 1990 1 9 223 9 45 27 -5 6287.5
1/10/1990 1990 1 10 224 11 45 28 -4 6283.5
1/11/1990 1990 1 11 225 7 49 28 -4 6279.5
1/12/1990 1990 1 12 226 8 48 28 -4 6275.5
1/13/1990 1990 1 13 227 23 55 39 7 6282.5
1/14/1990 1990 1 14 228 36 60 48 16 6298.5
1/15/1990 1990 1 15 229 29 45 37 5 6303.5
1/16/1990 1990 1 16 230 15 46 30.5 -1.5 6302
1/17/1990 1990 1 17 231 26 42 34 2 6304
1/18/1990 1990 1 18 232 19 40 29.5 -2.5 6301.5
1/19/1990 1990 1 19 233 29 42 35.5 3.5 6305
1/20/1990 1990 1 20 234 20 35 27.5 -4.5 6300.5
1/21/1990 1990 1 21 235 18 31 24.5 -7.5 6293
1/22/1990 1990 1 22 236 15 32 23.5 -8.5 6284.5
1/23/1990 1990 1 23 237 18 37 27.5 -4.5 6280
1/24/1990 1990 1 24 238 11 36 23.5 -8.5 6271.5
1/25/1990 1990 1 25 239 5 38 21.5 -10.5 6261
1/26/1990 1990 1 26 240 7 45 26 -6 6255
1/27/1990 1990 1 27 241 10 38 24 -8 6247
1/28/1990 1990 1 28 242 2 42 22 -10 6237
1/29/1990 1990 1 29 243 13 50 31.5 -0.5 6236.5
1/30/1990 1990 1 30 244 30 48 39 7 6243.5
1/31/1990 1990 1 31 245 39 50 44.5 12.5 6256
2/1/1990 1990 2 1 246 34 45 39.5 7.5 6263.5
2/2/1990 1990 2 2 247 25 42 33.5 1.5 6265
2/3/1990 1990 2 3 248 10 42 26 -6 6259
2/4/1990 1990 2 4 249 20 42 31 -1 6258
2/5/1990 1990 2 5 250 14 50 32 0 6258
2/6/1990 1990 2 6 251 12 46 29 -3 6255
2/7/1990 1990 2 7 252 36 52 44 12 6267
2/8/1990 1990 2 8 253 22 46 34 2 6269
2/9/1990 1990 2 9 254 13 47 30 -2 6267
2/10/1990 1990 2 10 255 20 56 38 6 6273
2/11/1990 1990 2 11 256 20 57 38.5 6.5 6279.5
2/12/1990 1990 2 12 257 32 63 47.5 15.5 6295
2/13/1990 1990 2 13 258 39 60 49.5 17.5 6312.5
2/14/1990 1990 2 14 259 21 32 26.5 -5.5 6307
2/15/1990 1990 2 15 260 6 36 21 -11 6296
2/16/1990 1990 2 16 261 29 37 33 1 6297
2/17/1990 1990 2 17 262 35 48 41.5 9.5 6306.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
2/18/1990 1990 2 18 263 37 48 42.5 10.5 6317
2/19/1990 1990 2 19 264 32 48 40 8 6325
2/20/1990 1990 2 20 265 24 55 39.5 7.5 6332.5
2/21/1990 1990 2 21 266 28 53 40.5 8.5 6341
2/22/1990 1990 2 22 267 23 56 39.5 7.5 6348.5
2/23/1990 1990 2 23 268 22 61 41.5 9.5 6358
2/24/1990 1990 2 24 269 37 60 48.5 16.5 6374.5
2/25/1990 1990 2 25 270 27 58 42.5 10.5 6385
2/26/1990 1990 2 26 271 28 65 46.5 14.5 6399.5
2/27/1990 1990 2 27 272 36 66 51 19 6418.5
2/28/1990 1990 2 28 273 30 59 44.5 12.5 6431
3/1/1990 1990 3 1 274 29 57 43 11 6442
3/2/1990 1990 3 2 275 38 61 49.5 17.5 6459.5
3/3/1990 1990 3 3 276 40 62 51 19 6478.5
3/4/1990 1990 3 4 277 38 63 50.5 18.5 6497
3/5/1990 1990 3 5 278 40 58 49 17 6514
3/6/1990 1990 3 6 279 38 48 43 11 6525
3/7/1990 1990 3 7 280 30 62 46 14 6539
3/8/1990 1990 3 8 281 46 64 55 23 6562
3/9/1990 1990 3 9 282 38 66 52 20 6582
3/10/1990 1990 3 10 283 36 67 51.5 19.5 6601.5
3/11/1990 1990 3 11 284 36 54 45 13 6614.5
3/12/1990 1990 3 12 285 32 48 40 8 6622.5
3/13/1990 1990 3 13 286 29 44 36.5 4.5 6627
3/14/1990 1990 3 14 287 20 45 32.5 0.5 6627.5
3/15/1990 1990 3 15 288 27 43 35 3 6630.5
3/16/1990 1990 3 16 289 18 59 38.5 6.5 6637
3/17/1990 1990 3 17 290 30 62 46 14 6651
3/18/1990 1990 3 18 291 34 65 49.5 17.5 6668.5
3/19/1990 1990 3 19 292 32 70 51 19 6687.5
3/20/1990 1990 3 20 293 42 70 56 24 6711.5
3/21/1990 1990 3 21 294 38 77 57.5 25.5 6737
3/22/1990 1990 3 22 295 33 79 56 24 6761
3/23/1990 1990 3 23 296 47 77 62 30 6791
3/24/1990 1990 3 24 297 40 72 56 24 6815
3/25/1990 1990 3 25 298 34 75 54.5 22.5 6837.5
3/26/1990 1990 3 26 299 40 72 56 24 6861.5
3/27/1990 1990 3 27 300 50 71 60.5 28.5 6890
3/28/1990 1990 3 28 301 43 60 51.5 19.5 6909.5
3/29/1990 1990 3 29 302 40 54 47 15 6924.5
3/30/1990 1990 3 30 303 42 60 51 19 6943.5
3/31/1990 1990 3 31 304 37 63 50 18 6961.5
4/1/1990 1990 4 1 305 39 68 53.5 21.5 6983
4/2/1990 1990 4 2 306 42 70 56 24 7007
4/3/1990 1990 4 3 307 50 76 63 31 7038
4/4/1990 1990 4 4 308 52 73 62.5 30.5 7068.5
4/5/1990 1990 4 5 309 38 75 56.5 24.5 7093
4/6/1990 1990 4 6 310 44 73 58.5 26.5 7119.5
4/7/1990 1990 4 7 311 42 70 56 24 7143.5
4/8/1990 1990 4 8 312 53 69 61 29 7172.5
4/9/1990 1990 4 9 313 54 69 61.5 29.5 7202
4/10/1990 1990 4 10 314 38 73 55.5 23.5 7225.5
4/11/1990 1990 4 11 315 40 76 58 26 7251.5
4/12/1990 1990 4 12 316 50 76 63 31 7282.5
4/13/1990 1990 4 13 317 60 77 68.5 36.5 7319
4/14/1990 1990 4 14 318 58 90 74 42 7361
4/15/1990 1990 4 15 319 63 85 74 42 7403
4/16/1990 1990 4 16 320 61 82 71.5 39.5 7442.5
4/17/1990 1990 4 17 321 60 71 65.5 33.5 7476
4/18/1990 1990 4 18 322 50 72 61 29 7505
4/19/1990 1990 4 19 323 53 74 63.5 31.5 7536.5
4/20/1990 1990 4 20 324 50 81 65.5 33.5 7570
4/21/1990 1990 4 21 325 55 82 68.5 36.5 7606.5
4/22/1990 1990 4 22 326 52 74 63 31 7637.5
4/23/1990 1990 4 23 327 42 70 56 24 7661.5
4/24/1990 1990 4 24 328 47 58 52.5 20.5 7682
4/25/1990 1990 4 25 329 50 66 58 26 7708
4/26/1990 1990 4 26 330 48 66 57 25 7733
4/27/1990 1990 4 27 331 60 74 67 35 7768
4/28/1990 1990 4 28 332 50 81 65.5 33.5 7801.5
4/29/1990 1990 4 29 333 40 55 47.5 15.5 7817
4/30/1990 1990 4 30 334 40 59 49.5 17.5 7834.5
5/1/1990 1990 5 1 335 43 55 49 17 7851.5
5/2/1990 1990 5 2 336 44 68 56 24 7875.5
5/3/1990 1990 5 3 337 58 76 67 35 7910.5
5/4/1990 1990 5 4 338 60 75 67.5 35.5 7946
5/5/1990 1990 5 5 339 52 80 66 34 7980
5/6/1990 1990 5 6 340 73 87 80 48 8028
5/7/1990 1990 5 7 341 67 88 77.5 45.5 8073.5
5/8/1990 1990 5 8 342 48 77 62.5 30.5 8104
5/9/1990 1990 5 9 343 44 68 56 24 8128
5/10/1990 1990 5 10 344 52 79 65.5 33.5 8161.5
5/11/1990 1990 5 11 345 65 78 71.5 39.5 8201
5/12/1990 1990 5 12 346 56 77 66.5 34.5 8235.5
5/13/1990 1990 5 13 347 67 77 72 40 8275.5
5/14/1990 1990 5 14 348 45 85 65 33 8308.5
5/15/1990 1990 5 15 349 50 67 58.5 26.5 8335
5/16/1990 1990 5 16 350 40 74 57 25 8360
5/17/1990 1990 5 17 351 53 87 70 38 8398
5/18/1990 1990 5 18 352 62 81 71.5 39.5 8437.5
5/19/1990 1990 5 19 353 64 78 71 39 8476.5
5/20/1990 1990 5 20 354 46 84 65 33 8509.5
5/21/1990 1990 5 21 355 62 89 75.5 43.5 8553
5/22/1990 1990 5 22 356 64 90 77 45 8598
5/23/1990 1990 5 23 357 50 85 67.5 35.5 8633.5
5/24/1990 1990 5 24 358 65 82 73.5 41.5 8675
5/25/1990 1990 5 25 359 57 80 68.5 36.5 8711.5
5/26/1990 1990 5 26 360 57 82 69.5 37.5 8749
5/27/1990 1990 5 27 361 47 88 67.5 35.5 8784.5
5/28/1990 1990 5 28 362 58 72 65 33 8817.5
5/29/1990 1990 5 29 363 58 74 66 34 8851.5
5/30/1990 1990 5 30 364 57 80 68.5 36.5 8888
5/31/1990 1990 5 31 365 62 80 71 39 8927
6/1/1990 1990 6 1 1 47 62 54.5 22.5 22.5
6/3/1990 1990 6 3 3 57 94 75.5 43.5 66
6/4/1990 1990 6 4 4 48 100 74 42 108
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
6/5/1990 1990 6 5 5 92 100 96 64 172
6/6/1990 1990 6 6 6 77 94 85.5 53.5 225.5
6/7/1990 1990 6 7 7 68 95 81.5 49.5 275
6/8/1990 1990 6 8 8 70 99 84.5 52.5 327.5
6/9/1990 1990 6 9 9 60 94 77 45 372.5
6/10/1990 1990 6 10 10 65 87 76 44 416.5
6/11/1990 1990 6 11 11 62 71 66.5 34.5 451
6/12/1990 1990 6 12 12 46 87 66.5 34.5 485.5
6/13/1990 1990 6 13 13 67 91 79 47 532.5
6/14/1990 1990 6 14 14 74 90 82 50 582.5
6/15/1990 1990 6 15 15 67 88 77.5 45.5 628
6/16/1990 1990 6 16 16 68 85 76.5 44.5 672.5
6/17/1990 1990 6 17 17 72 91 81.5 49.5 722
6/18/1990 1990 6 18 18 66 93 79.5 47.5 769.5
6/19/1990 1990 6 19 19 72 86 79 47 816.5
6/20/1990 1990 6 20 20 68 95 81.5 49.5 866
6/21/1990 1990 6 21 21 70 97 83.5 51.5 917.5
6/22/1990 1990 6 22 22 67 102 84.5 52.5 970
6/23/1990 1990 6 23 23 78 106 92 60 1030
6/24/1990 1990 6 24 24 72 102 87 55 1085
6/25/1990 1990 6 25 25 66 107 86.5 54.5 1139.5
6/26/1990 1990 6 26 26 78 107 92.5 60.5 1200
6/27/1990 1990 6 27 27 67 103 85 53 1253
6/28/1990 1990 6 28 28 72 106 89 57 1310
6/29/1990 1990 6 29 29 82 105 93.5 61.5 1371.5
6/30/1990 1990 6 30 30 81 105 93 61 1432.5
7/1/1990 1990 7 1 31 81 105 93 61 1493.5
7/2/1990 1990 7 2 32 78 102 90 58 1551.5
7/3/1990 1990 7 3 33 69 95 82 50 1601.5
7/4/1990 1990 7 4 34 60 102 81 49 1650.5
7/5/1990 1990 7 5 35 77 104 90.5 58.5 1709
7/6/1990 1990 7 6 36 69 100 84.5 52.5 1761.5
7/7/1990 1990 7 7 37 67 82 74.5 42.5 1804
7/8/1990 1990 7 8 38 60 83 71.5 39.5 1843.5
7/9/1990 1990 7 9 39 65 90 77.5 45.5 1889
7/10/1990 1990 7 10 40 69 93 81 49 1938
7/11/1990 1990 7 11 41 76 96 86 54 1992
7/12/1990 1990 7 12 42 75 101 88 56 2048
7/13/1990 1990 7 13 43 80 103 91.5 59.5 2107.5
7/14/1990 1990 7 14 44 72 94 83 51 2158.5
7/15/1990 1990 7 15 45 72 95 83.5 51.5 2210
7/16/1990 1990 7 16 46 62 96 79 47 2257
7/17/1990 1990 7 17 47 67 100 83.5 51.5 2308.5
7/18/1990 1990 7 18 48 67 92 79.5 47.5 2356
7/19/1990 1990 7 19 49 67 92 79.5 47.5 2403.5
7/20/1990 1990 7 20 50 62 92 77 45 2448.5
7/21/1990 1990 7 21 51 63 94 78.5 46.5 2495
7/22/1990 1990 7 22 52 75 95 85 53 2548
7/23/1990 1990 7 23 53 74 101 87.5 55.5 2603.5
7/24/1990 1990 7 24 54 73 86 79.5 47.5 2651
7/25/1990 1990 7 25 55 84 94 89 57 2708
7/26/1990 1990 7 26 56 72 97 84.5 52.5 2760.5
7/27/1990 1990 7 27 57 76 95 85.5 53.5 2814
7/28/1990 1990 7 28 58 70 104 87 55 2869
7/29/1990 1990 7 29 59 75 75 75 43 2912
7/30/1990 1990 7 30 60 68 100 84 52 2964
7/31/1990 1990 7 31 61 60 100 80 48 3012
8/1/1990 1990 8 1 62 66 96 81 49 3061
8/2/1990 1990 8 2 63 58 90 74 42 3103
8/3/1990 1990 8 3 64 57 95 76 44 3147
8/4/1990 1990 8 4 65 58 100 79 47 3194
8/5/1990 1990 8 5 66 60 95 77.5 45.5 3239.5
8/6/1990 1990 8 6 67 72 92 82 50 3289.5
8/7/1990 1990 8 7 68 67 97 82 50 3339.5
8/8/1990 1990 8 8 69 63 101 82 50 3389.5
8/9/1990 1990 8 9 70 77 101 89 57 3446.5
8/10/1990 1990 8 10 71 72 98 85 53 3499.5
8/11/1990 1990 8 11 72 65 97 81 49 3548.5
8/12/1990 1990 8 12 73 62 94 78 46 3594.5
8/13/1990 1990 8 13 74 67 85 76 44 3638.5
8/14/1990 1990 8 14 75 65 80 72.5 40.5 3679
8/15/1990 1990 8 15 76 63 72 67.5 35.5 3714.5
8/16/1990 1990 8 16 77 64 72 68 36 3750.5
8/17/1990 1990 8 17 78 62 85 73.5 41.5 3792
8/18/1990 1990 8 18 79 69 85 77 45 3837
8/19/1990 1990 8 19 80 70 83 76.5 44.5 3881.5
8/20/1990 1990 8 20 81 69 91 80 48 3929.5
8/21/1990 1990 8 21 82 69 93 81 49 3978.5
8/22/1990 1990 8 22 83 66 87 76.5 44.5 4023
8/23/1990 1990 8 23 84 70 94 82 50 4073
8/24/1990 1990 8 24 85 55 93 74 42 4115
8/25/1990 1990 8 25 86 72 92 82 50 4165
8/26/1990 1990 8 26 87 70 93 81.5 49.5 4214.5
8/27/1990 1990 8 27 88 58 98 78 46 4260.5
8/28/1990 1990 8 28 89 64 98 81 49 4309.5
8/29/1990 1990 8 29 90 59 102 80.5 48.5 4358
8/30/1990 1990 8 30 91 68 101 84.5 52.5 4410.5
8/31/1990 1990 8 31 92 70 95 82.5 50.5 4461
9/1/1990 1990 9 1 93 72 85 78.5 46.5 4507.5
9/2/1990 1990 9 2 94 67 75 71 39 4546.5
9/3/1990 1990 9 3 95 63 88 75.5 43.5 4590
9/4/1990 1990 9 4 96 72 92 82 50 4640
9/5/1990 1990 9 5 97 68 82 75 43 4683
9/6/1990 1990 9 6 98 63 88 75.5 43.5 4726.5
9/7/1990 1990 9 7 99 64 90 77 45 4771.5
9/8/1990 1990 9 8 100 67 93 80 48 4819.5
9/9/1990 1990 9 9 101 72 72 72 40 4859.5
9/10/1990 1990 9 10 102 62 97 79.5 47.5 4907
9/11/1990 1990 9 11 103 59 96 77.5 45.5 4952.5
9/12/1990 1990 9 12 104 83 98 90.5 58.5 5011
9/13/1990 1990 9 13 105 58 98 78 46 5057
9/14/1990 1990 9 14 106 72 96 84 52 5109
9/15/1990 1990 9 15 107 72 92 82 50 5159
9/16/1990 1990 9 16 108 60 70 65 33 5192
9/17/1990 1990 9 17 109 51 70 60.5 28.5 5220.5
9/18/1990 1990 9 18 110 55 64 59.5 27.5 5248
9/19/1990 1990 9 19 111 65 76 70.5 38.5 5286.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
9/20/1990 1990 9 20 112 51 70 60.5 28.5 5315
9/21/1990 1990 9 21 113 52 76 64 32 5347
9/22/1990 1990 9 22 114 54 80 67 35 5382
9/23/1990 1990 9 23 115 60 76 68 36 5418
9/24/1990 1990 9 24 116 60 76 68 36 5454
9/25/1990 1990 9 25 117 55 80 67.5 35.5 5489.5
9/26/1990 1990 9 26 118 67 80 73.5 41.5 5531
9/27/1990 1990 9 27 119 53 78 65.5 33.5 5564.5
9/28/1990 1990 9 28 120 50 66 58 26 5590.5
9/29/1990 1990 9 29 121 49 72 60.5 28.5 5619
9/30/1990 1990 9 30 122 51 76 63.5 31.5 5650.5
10/1/1990 1990 10 1 123 60 75 67.5 35.5 5686
10/2/1990 1990 10 2 124 52 76 64 32 5718
10/3/1990 1990 10 3 125 48 70 59 27 5745
10/4/1990 1990 10 4 126 44 78 61 29 5774
10/5/1990 1990 10 5 127 45 74 59.5 27.5 5801.5
10/6/1990 1990 10 6 128 70 82 76 44 5845.5
10/7/1990 1990 10 7 129 54 62 58 26 5871.5
10/8/1990 1990 10 8 130 35 61 48 16 5887.5
10/9/1990 1990 10 9 131 32 58 45 13 5900.5
10/10/1990 1990 10 10 132 35 67 51 19 5919.5
10/11/1990 1990 10 11 133 40 69 54.5 22.5 5942
10/12/1990 1990 10 12 134 32 68 50 18 5960
10/13/1990 1990 10 13 135 32 74 53 21 5981
10/14/1990 1990 10 14 136 38 75 56.5 24.5 6005.5
10/15/1990 1990 10 15 137 59 82 70.5 38.5 6044
10/16/1990 1990 10 16 138 44 84 64 32 6076
10/17/1990 1990 10 17 139 38 63 50.5 18.5 6094.5
10/18/1990 1990 10 18 140 30 65 47.5 15.5 6110
10/19/1990 1990 10 19 141 48 54 51 19 6129
10/20/1990 1990 10 20 142 38 54 46 14 6143
10/21/1990 1990 10 21 143 25 25 25 -7 6136
11/1/1990 1990 11 1 154 57 57 57 25 6161
11/2/1990 1990 11 2 155 44 44 44 12 6173
11/3/1990 1990 11 3 156 40 45 42.5 10.5 6183.5
11/4/1990 1990 11 4 157 18 48 33 1 6184.5
11/5/1990 1990 11 5 158 32 36 34 2 6186.5
11/6/1990 1990 11 6 159 32 32 32 0 6186.5
11/7/1990 1990 11 7 160 32 42 37 5 6191.5
11/8/1990 1990 11 8 161 39 39 39 7 6198.5
11/10/1990 1990 11 10 163 54 54 54 22 6213.5
11/11/1990 1990 11 11 164 62 62 62 30 6243.5
11/12/1990 1990 11 12 165 22 57 39.5 7.5 6251
11/13/1990 1990 11 13 166 22 58 40 8 6259
11/14/1990 1990 11 14 167 22 60 41 9 6268
11/15/1990 1990 11 15 168 24 54 39 7 6275
11/16/1990 1990 11 16 169 30 57 43.5 11.5 6286.5
11/17/1990 1990 11 17 170 27 52 39.5 7.5 6294
11/18/1990 1990 11 18 171 22 55 38.5 6.5 6300.5
11/19/1990 1990 11 19 172 32 50 41 9 6309.5
11/20/1990 1990 11 20 173 50 55 52.5 20.5 6330
11/21/1990 1990 11 21 174 15 45 30 -2 6328
11/22/1990 1990 11 22 175 12 50 31 -1 6327
11/23/1990 1990 11 23 176 25 45 35 3 6330
11/24/1990 1990 11 24 177 32 32 32 0 6330
11/25/1990 1990 11 25 178 11 43 27 -5 6325
11/26/1990 1990 11 26 179 35 52 43.5 11.5 6336.5
11/27/1990 1990 11 27 180 15 42 28.5 -3.5 6333
11/28/1990 1990 11 28 181 10 42 26 -6 6327
11/29/1990 1990 11 29 182 7 38 22.5 -9.5 6317.5
11/30/1990 1990 11 30 183 12 36 24 -8 6309.5
12/1/1990 1990 12 1 184 7 38 22.5 -9.5 6300
12/2/1990 1990 12 2 185 6 38 22 -10 6290
12/3/1990 1990 12 3 186 5 20 12.5 -19.5 6270.5
12/4/1990 1990 12 4 187 12 35 23.5 -8.5 6262
12/5/1990 1990 12 5 188 8 20 14 -18 6244
12/6/1990 1990 12 6 189 4 40 22 -10 6234
12/7/1990 1990 12 7 190 10 39 24.5 -7.5 6226.5
12/8/1990 1990 12 8 191 2 2 2 -30 6196.5
12/9/1990 1990 12 9 192 8 34 21 -11 6185.5
12/10/1990 1990 12 10 193 6 45 25.5 -6.5 6179
12/11/1990 1990 12 11 194 8 38 23 -9 6170
12/12/1990 1990 12 12 195 26 50 38 6 6176
12/13/1990 1990 12 13 196 26 42 34 2 6178
12/14/1990 1990 12 14 197 14 48 31 -1 6177
12/15/1990 1990 12 15 198 2 32 17 -15 6162
12/16/1990 1990 12 16 199 20 38 29 -3 6159
12/17/1990 1990 12 17 200 8 38 23 -9 6150
12/18/1990 1990 12 18 201 26 40 33 1 6151
12/19/1990 1990 12 19 202 28 40 34 2 6153
12/20/1990 1990 12 20 203 24 32 28 -4 6149
12/21/1990 1990 12 21 204 5 20 12.5 -19.5 6129.5
12/22/1990 1990 12 22 205 -2 17 7.5 -24.5 6105
12/23/1990 1990 12 23 206 -5 14 4.5 -27.5 6077.5
12/24/1990 1990 12 24 207 -12 17 2.5 -29.5 6048
12/25/1990 1990 12 25 208 10 25 17.5 -14.5 6033.5
12/26/1990 1990 12 26 209 5 26 15.5 -16.5 6017
12/27/1990 1990 12 27 210 -2 24 11 -21 5996
12/28/1990 1990 12 28 211 0 34 17 -15 5981
12/29/1990 1990 12 29 212 13 42 27.5 -4.5 5976.5
12/30/1990 1990 12 30 213 -10 20 5 -27 5949.5
12/31/1990 1990 12 31 214 -10 18 4 -28 5921.5
1/1/1991 1991 1 1 215 -8 26 9 -23 5898.5
1/2/1991 1991 1 2 216 -5 28 11.5 -20.5 5878
1/3/1991 1991 1 3 217 0 25 12.5 -19.5 5858.5
1/4/1991 1991 1 4 218 18 27 22.5 -9.5 5849
1/5/1991 1991 1 5 219 20 32 26 -6 5843
1/6/1991 1991 1 6 220 25 32 28.5 -3.5 5839.5
1/7/1991 1991 1 7 221 25 33 29 -3 5836.5
1/8/1991 1991 1 8 222 25 33 29 -3 5833.5
1/9/1991 1991 1 9 223 25 32 28.5 -3.5 5830
1/10/1991 1991 1 10 224 11 33 22 -10 5820
1/11/1991 1991 1 11 225 10 29 19.5 -12.5 5807.5
1/12/1991 1991 1 12 226 25 28 26.5 -5.5 5802
1/13/1991 1991 1 13 227 15 28 21.5 -10.5 5791.5
1/14/1991 1991 1 14 228 15 25 20 -12 5779.5
1/15/1991 1991 1 15 229 15 24 19.5 -12.5 5767
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
1/16/1991 1991 1 16 230 10 39 24.5 -7.5 5759.5
1/17/1991 1991 1 17 231 0 32 16 -16 5743.5
1/18/1991 1991 1 18 232 2 33 17.5 -14.5 5729
1/19/1991 1991 1 19 233 0 30 15 -17 5712
1/20/1991 1991 1 20 234 0 27 13.5 -18.5 5693.5
1/21/1991 1991 1 21 235 0 28 14 -18 5675.5
1/22/1991 1991 1 22 236 -8 5 -1.5 -33.5 5642
1/23/1991 1991 1 23 237 -4 27 11.5 -20.5 5621.5
1/24/1991 1991 1 24 238 -5 28 11.5 -20.5 5601
1/25/1991 1991 1 25 239 -7 27 10 -22 5579
1/26/1991 1991 1 26 240 -7 27 10 -22 5557
1/27/1991 1991 1 27 241 -5 30 12.5 -19.5 5537.5
1/28/1991 1991 1 28 242 -6 29 11.5 -20.5 5517
1/29/1991 1991 1 29 243 4 30 17 -15 5502
1/30/1991 1991 1 30 244 -8 27 9.5 -22.5 5479.5
1/31/1991 1991 1 31 245 -7 24 8.5 -23.5 5456
2/1/1991 1991 2 1 246 -3 31 14 -18 5438
2/2/1991 1991 2 2 247 -5 30 12.5 -19.5 5418.5
2/3/1991 1991 2 3 248 10 37 23.5 -8.5 5410
2/4/1991 1991 2 4 249 5 44 24.5 -7.5 5402.5
2/5/1991 1991 2 5 250 5 38 21.5 -10.5 5392
2/6/1991 1991 2 6 251 11 44 27.5 -4.5 5387.5
2/7/1991 1991 2 7 252 12 42 27 -5 5382.5
2/8/1991 1991 2 8 253 22 47 34.5 2.5 5385
2/9/1991 1991 2 9 254 15 47 31 -1 5384
2/10/1991 1991 2 10 255 20 48 34 2 5386
2/11/1991 1991 2 11 256 18 45 31.5 -0.5 5385.5
2/12/1991 1991 2 12 257 21 46 33.5 1.5 5387
2/13/1991 1991 2 13 258 20 59 39.5 7.5 5394.5
2/14/1991 1991 2 14 259 22 59 40.5 8.5 5403
2/15/1991 1991 2 15 260 24 54 39 7 5410
2/16/1991 1991 2 16 261 34 55 44.5 12.5 5422.5
2/17/1991 1991 2 17 262 34 49 41.5 9.5 5432
2/18/1991 1991 2 18 263 20 45 32.5 0.5 5432.5
2/19/1991 1991 2 19 264 14 49 31.5 -0.5 5432
2/20/1991 1991 2 20 265 28 48 38 6 5438
2/21/1991 1991 2 21 266 18 56 37 5 5443
2/22/1991 1991 2 22 267 22 60 41 9 5452
2/23/1991 1991 2 23 268 40 63 51.5 19.5 5471.5
2/24/1991 1991 2 24 269 22 55 38.5 6.5 5478
2/25/1991 1991 2 25 270 24 50 37 5 5483
2/26/1991 1991 2 26 271 14 53 33.5 1.5 5484.5
2/27/1991 1991 2 27 272 15 55 35 3 5487.5
2/28/1991 1991 2 28 273 43 54 48.5 16.5 5504
3/1/1991 1991 3 1 274 42 52 47 15 5519
3/2/1991 1991 3 2 275 33 57 45 13 5532
3/3/1991 1991 3 3 276 20 64 42 10 5542
3/4/1991 1991 3 4 277 36 62 49 17 5559
3/5/1991 1991 3 5 278 40 60 50 18 5577
3/6/1991 1991 3 6 279 32 42 37 5 5582
3/7/1991 1991 3 7 280 20 47 33.5 1.5 5583.5
3/8/1991 1991 3 8 281 15 53 34 2 5585.5
3/9/1991 1991 3 9 282 15 55 35 3 5588.5
3/10/1991 1991 3 10 283 35 64 49.5 17.5 5606
3/11/1991 1991 3 11 284 40 55 47.5 15.5 5621.5
3/12/1991 1991 3 12 285 20 55 37.5 5.5 5627
3/13/1991 1991 3 13 286 20 55 37.5 5.5 5632.5
3/14/1991 1991 3 14 287 35 43 39 7 5639.5
3/15/1991 1991 3 15 288 31 47 39 7 5646.5
3/16/1991 1991 3 16 289 23 54 38.5 6.5 5653
3/17/1991 1991 3 17 290 42 56 49 17 5670
3/18/1991 1991 3 18 291 25 25 25 -7 5663
3/19/1991 1991 3 19 292 25 55 40 8 5671
3/20/1991 1991 3 20 293 37 54 45.5 13.5 5684.5
3/21/1991 1991 3 21 294 34 50 42 10 5694.5
3/22/1991 1991 3 22 295 35 55 45 13 5707.5
3/23/1991 1991 3 23 296 32 56 44 12 5719.5
3/24/1991 1991 3 24 297 33 67 50 18 5737.5
3/25/1991 1991 3 25 298 43 61 52 20 5757.5
3/26/1991 1991 3 26 299 34 40 37 5 5762.5
3/27/1991 1991 3 27 300 32 41 36.5 4.5 5767
3/28/1991 1991 3 28 301 30 55 42.5 10.5 5777.5
3/29/1991 1991 3 29 302 32 47 39.5 7.5 5785
3/30/1991 1991 3 30 303 24 58 41 9 5794
3/31/1991 1991 3 31 304 26 63 44.5 12.5 5806.5
4/1/1991 1991 4 1 305 29 53 41 9 5815.5
4/2/1991 1991 4 2 306 32 70 51 19 5834.5
4/3/1991 1991 4 3 307 52 70 61 29 5863.5
4/4/1991 1991 4 4 308 34 72 53 21 5884.5
4/5/1991 1991 4 5 309 37 77 57 25 5909.5
4/6/1991 1991 4 6 310 42 77 59.5 27.5 5937
4/7/1991 1991 4 7 311 55 67 61 29 5966
4/8/1991 1991 4 8 312 38 58 48 16 5982
4/9/1991 1991 4 9 313 27 64 45.5 13.5 5995.5
4/10/1991 1991 4 10 314 34 53 43.5 11.5 6007
4/11/1991 1991 4 11 315 35 48 41.5 9.5 6016.5
4/12/1991 1991 4 12 316 35 46 40.5 8.5 6025
4/13/1991 1991 4 13 317 30 55 42.5 10.5 6035.5
4/14/1991 1991 4 14 318 27 65 46 14 6049.5
4/15/1991 1991 4 15 319 55 70 62.5 30.5 6080
4/16/1991 1991 4 16 320 55 74 64.5 32.5 6112.5
4/17/1991 1991 4 17 321 55 72 63.5 31.5 6144
4/18/1991 1991 4 18 322 34 67 50.5 18.5 6162.5
4/19/1991 1991 4 19 323 55 71 63 31 6193.5
4/20/1991 1991 4 20 324 41 68 54.5 22.5 6216
4/21/1991 1991 4 21 325 48 68 58 26 6242
4/22/1991 1991 4 22 326 37 63 50 18 6260
4/23/1991 1991 4 23 327 45 66 55.5 23.5 6283.5
4/24/1991 1991 4 24 328 62 72 67 35 6318.5
4/25/1991 1991 4 25 329 45 64 54.5 22.5 6341
4/26/1991 1991 4 26 330 37 55 46 14 6355
4/27/1991 1991 4 27 331 32 51 41.5 9.5 6364.5
4/28/1991 1991 4 28 332 33 57 45 13 6377.5
4/29/1991 1991 4 29 333 24 57 40.5 8.5 6386
4/30/1991 1991 4 30 334 28 66 47 15 6401
5/1/1991 1991 5 1 335 27 76 51.5 19.5 6420.5
5/2/1991 1991 5 2 336 50 62 56 24 6444.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
5/3/1991 1991 5 3 337 37 64 50.5 18.5 6463
5/4/1991 1991 5 4 338 46 62 54 22 6485
5/5/1991 1991 5 5 339 42 72 57 25 6510
5/6/1991 1991 5 6 340 60 75 67.5 35.5 6545.5
5/7/1991 1991 5 7 341 61 77 69 37 6582.5
5/8/1991 1991 5 8 342 55 87 71 39 6621.5
5/9/1991 1991 5 9 343 64 83 73.5 41.5 6663
5/10/1991 1991 5 10 344 55 63 59 27 6690
5/11/1991 1991 5 11 345 46 64 55 23 6713
5/12/1991 1991 5 12 346 44 70 57 25 6738
5/13/1991 1991 5 13 347 59 77 68 36 6774
5/14/1991 1991 5 14 348 63 70 66.5 34.5 6808.5
5/15/1991 1991 5 15 349 52 71 61.5 29.5 6838
5/16/1991 1991 5 16 350 42 77 59.5 27.5 6865.5
5/17/1991 1991 5 17 351 45 78 61.5 29.5 6895
5/18/1991 1991 5 18 352 64 80 72 40 6935
5/19/1991 1991 5 19 353 60 84 72 40 6975
5/20/1991 1991 5 20 354 48 85 66.5 34.5 7009.5
5/21/1991 1991 5 21 355 70 83 76.5 44.5 7054
5/22/1991 1991 5 22 356 58 77 67.5 35.5 7089.5
5/23/1991 1991 5 23 357 57 77 67 35 7124.5
5/24/1991 1991 5 24 358 61 84 72.5 40.5 7165
5/25/1991 1991 5 25 359 57 82 69.5 37.5 7202.5
5/26/1991 1991 5 26 360 73 87 80 48 7250.5
5/27/1991 1991 5 27 361 63 86 74.5 42.5 7293
5/28/1991 1991 5 28 362 50 82 66 34 7327
5/29/1991 1991 5 29 363 42 85 63.5 31.5 7358.5
5/30/1991 1991 5 30 364 59 75 67 35 7393.5
5/31/1991 1991 5 31 365 48 58 53 21 7414.5
6/1/1991 1991 6 1 1 51 67 59 27 27
6/2/1991 1991 6 2 2 55 77 66 34 61
6/3/1991 1991 6 3 3 57 82 69.5 37.5 98.5
6/4/1991 1991 6 4 4 66 85 75.5 43.5 142
6/5/1991 1991 6 5 5 67 87 77 45 187
6/6/1991 1991 6 6 6 70 87 78.5 46.5 233.5
6/7/1991 1991 6 7 7 70 92 81 49 282.5
6/8/1991 1991 6 8 8 67 95 81 49 331.5
6/9/1991 1991 6 9 9 65 92 78.5 46.5 378
6/10/1991 1991 6 10 10 57 91 74 42 420
6/11/1991 1991 6 11 11 72 95 83.5 51.5 471.5
6/12/1991 1991 6 12 12 74 92 83 51 522.5
6/13/1991 1991 6 13 13 62 85 73.5 41.5 564
6/14/1991 1991 6 14 14 75 87 81 49 613
6/15/1991 1991 6 15 15 67 90 78.5 46.5 659.5
6/16/1991 1991 6 16 16 70 95 82.5 50.5 710
6/17/1991 1991 6 17 17 70 92 81 49 759
6/18/1991 1991 6 18 18 56 94 75 43 802
6/19/1991 1991 6 19 19 80 94 87 55 857
6/20/1991 1991 6 20 20 55 91 73 41 898
6/21/1991 1991 6 21 21 63 92 77.5 45.5 943.5
6/22/1991 1991 6 22 22 67 90 78.5 46.5 990
6/23/1991 1991 6 23 23 70 91 80.5 48.5 1038.5
6/24/1991 1991 6 24 24 75 95 85 53 1091.5
6/25/1991 1991 6 25 25 75 90 82.5 50.5 1142
6/26/1991 1991 6 26 26 65 87 76 44 1186
6/27/1991 1991 6 27 27 45 82 63.5 31.5 1217.5
6/28/1991 1991 6 28 28 53 89 71 39 1256.5
6/29/1991 1991 6 29 29 75 90 82.5 50.5 1307
6/30/1991 1991 6 30 30 74 87 80.5 48.5 1355.5
7/1/1991 1991 7 1 31 55 94 74.5 42.5 1398
7/2/1991 1991 7 2 32 63 97 80 48 1446
7/3/1991 1991 7 3 33 70 98 84 52 1498
7/4/1991 1991 7 4 34 60 98 79 47 1545
7/5/1991 1991 7 5 35 73 104 88.5 56.5 1601.5
7/6/1991 1991 7 6 36 75 104 89.5 57.5 1659
7/7/1991 1991 7 7 37 80 94 87 55 1714
7/8/1991 1991 7 8 38 72 84 78 46 1760
7/9/1991 1991 7 9 39 71 93 82 50 1810
7/10/1991 1991 7 10 40 70 87 78.5 46.5 1856.5
7/11/1991 1991 7 11 41 65 91 78 46 1902.5
7/12/1991 1991 7 12 42 62 98 80 48 1950.5
7/13/1991 1991 7 13 43 77 98 87.5 55.5 2006
7/14/1991 1991 7 14 44 63 92 77.5 45.5 2051.5
7/15/1991 1991 7 15 45 70 97 83.5 51.5 2103
7/16/1991 1991 7 16 46 65 100 82.5 50.5 2153.5
7/17/1991 1991 7 17 47 68 92 80 48 2201.5
7/18/1991 1991 7 18 48 72 90 81 49 2250.5
7/19/1991 1991 7 19 49 72 91 81.5 49.5 2300
7/20/1991 1991 7 20 50 64 69 66.5 34.5 2334.5
7/21/1991 1991 7 21 51 64 85 74.5 42.5 2377
7/22/1991 1991 7 22 52 68 94 81 49 2426
7/23/1991 1991 7 23 53 67 91 79 47 2473
7/24/1991 1991 7 24 54 65 84 74.5 42.5 2515.5
7/25/1991 1991 7 25 55 55 90 72.5 40.5 2556
7/26/1991 1991 7 26 56 62 92 77 45 2601
7/27/1991 1991 7 27 57 65 95 80 48 2649
7/28/1991 1991 7 28 58 70 100 85 53 2702
7/29/1991 1991 7 29 59 70 97 83.5 51.5 2753.5
7/30/1991 1991 7 30 60 68 96 82 50 2803.5
7/31/1991 1991 7 31 61 84 93 88.5 56.5 2860
8/1/1991 1991 8 1 62 80 96 88 56 2916
8/2/1991 1991 8 2 63 65 89 77 45 2961
8/3/1991 1991 8 3 64 64 81 72.5 40.5 3001.5
8/4/1991 1991 8 4 65 59 87 73 41 3042.5
8/5/1991 1991 8 5 66 62 87 74.5 42.5 3085
8/6/1991 1991 8 6 67 52 78 65 33 3118
8/7/1991 1991 8 7 68 62 89 75.5 43.5 3161.5
8/8/1991 1991 8 8 69 59 92 75.5 43.5 3205
8/9/1991 1991 8 9 70 81 98 89.5 57.5 3262.5
8/10/1991 1991 8 10 71 75 94 84.5 52.5 3315
8/11/1991 1991 8 11 72 68 88 78 46 3361
8/12/1991 1991 8 12 73 68 87 77.5 45.5 3406.5
8/13/1991 1991 8 13 74 72 94 83 51 3457.5
8/14/1991 1991 8 14 75 70 95 82.5 50.5 3508
8/15/1991 1991 8 15 76 65 95 80 48 3556
8/16/1991 1991 8 16 77 59 92 75.5 43.5 3599.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
8/17/1991 1991 8 17 78 68 98 83 51 3650.5
8/18/1991 1991 8 18 79 64 87 75.5 43.5 3694
8/19/1991 1991 8 19 80 59 92 75.5 43.5 3737.5
8/20/1991 1991 8 20 81 74 93 83.5 51.5 3789
8/21/1991 1991 8 21 82 62 97 79.5 47.5 3836.5
8/22/1991 1991 8 22 83 68 90 79 47 3883.5
8/23/1991 1991 8 23 84 60 94 77 45 3928.5
8/24/1991 1991 8 24 85 72 90 81 49 3977.5
8/25/1991 1991 8 25 86 71 92 81.5 49.5 4027
8/26/1991 1991 8 26 87 68 88 78 46 4073
8/27/1991 1991 8 27 88 62 85 73.5 41.5 4114.5
8/28/1991 1991 8 28 89 62 92 77 45 4159.5
8/29/1991 1991 8 29 90 62 94 78 46 4205.5
8/30/1991 1991 8 30 91 63 96 79.5 47.5 4253
8/31/1991 1991 8 31 92 67 94 80.5 48.5 4301.5
9/1/1991 1991 9 1 93 68 76 72 40 4341.5
9/2/1991 1991 9 2 94 65 89 77 45 4386.5
9/3/1991 1991 9 3 95 56 93 74.5 42.5 4429
9/4/1991 1991 9 4 96 57 95 76 44 4473
9/5/1991 1991 9 5 97 70 87 78.5 46.5 4519.5
9/6/1991 1991 9 6 98 59 69 64 32 4551.5
9/7/1991 1991 9 7 99 62 76 69 37 4588.5
9/8/1991 1991 9 8 100 56 78 67 35 4623.5
9/9/1991 1991 9 9 101 57 86 71.5 39.5 4663
9/10/1991 1991 9 10 102 69 82 75.5 43.5 4706.5
9/11/1991 1991 9 11 103 60 82 71 39 4745.5
9/12/1991 1991 9 12 104 54 79 66.5 34.5 4780
9/13/1991 1991 9 13 105 52 78 65 33 4813
9/14/1991 1991 9 14 106 70 84 77 45 4858
9/15/1991 1991 9 15 107 48 75 61.5 29.5 4887.5
9/16/1991 1991 9 16 108 43 75 59 27 4914.5
9/17/1991 1991 9 17 109 44 82 63 31 4945.5
9/18/1991 1991 9 18 110 47 81 64 32 4977.5
9/19/1991 1991 9 19 111 72 82 77 45 5022.5
9/20/1991 1991 9 20 112 50 85 67.5 35.5 5058
9/21/1991 1991 9 21 113 53 88 70.5 38.5 5096.5
9/22/1991 1991 9 22 114 50 82 66 34 5130.5
9/23/1991 1991 9 23 115 44 83 63.5 31.5 5162
9/24/1991 1991 9 24 116 46 80 63 31 5193
9/25/1991 1991 9 25 117 45 84 64.5 32.5 5225.5
9/26/1991 1991 9 26 118 46 88 67 35 5260.5
9/27/1991 1991 9 27 119 60 85 72.5 40.5 5301
9/28/1991 1991 9 28 120 64 85 74.5 42.5 5343.5
9/29/1991 1991 9 29 121 55 71 63 31 5374.5
9/30/1991 1991 9 30 122 52 78 65 33 5407.5
10/1/1991 1991 10 1 123 45 81 63 31 5438.5
10/2/1991 1991 10 2 124 48 83 65.5 33.5 5472
10/3/1991 1991 10 3 125 44 84 64 32 5504
10/4/1991 1991 10 4 126 50 75 62.5 30.5 5534.5
10/5/1991 1991 10 5 127 37 76 56.5 24.5 5559
10/6/1991 1991 10 6 128 38 82 60 28 5587
10/7/1991 1991 10 7 129 38 80 59 27 5614
10/8/1991 1991 10 8 130 42 81 61.5 29.5 5643.5
10/9/1991 1991 10 9 131 42 79 60.5 28.5 5672
10/10/1991 1991 10 10 132 35 82 58.5 26.5 5698.5
10/11/1991 1991 10 11 133 57 82 69.5 37.5 5736
10/12/1991 1991 10 12 134 42 78 60 28 5764
10/13/1991 1991 10 13 135 38 82 60 28 5792
10/14/1991 1991 10 14 136 37 75 56 24 5816
10/15/1991 1991 10 15 137 35 83 59 27 5843
10/16/1991 1991 10 16 138 35 85 60 28 5871
10/17/1991 1991 10 17 139 48 82 65 33 5904
10/18/1991 1991 10 18 140 41 79 60 28 5932
10/19/1991 1991 10 19 141 38 69 53.5 21.5 5953.5
10/20/1991 1991 10 20 142 42 72 57 25 5978.5
10/21/1991 1991 10 21 143 37 75 56 24 6002.5
10/22/1991 1991 10 22 144 35 77 56 24 6026.5
10/23/1991 1991 10 23 145 56 63 59.5 27.5 6054
10/24/1991 1991 10 24 146 43 57 50 18 6072
10/25/1991 1991 10 25 147 35 58 46.5 14.5 6086.5
10/26/1991 1991 10 26 148 37 64 50.5 18.5 6105
10/27/1991 1991 10 27 149 38 50 44 12 6117
10/28/1991 1991 10 28 150 30 40 35 3 6120
10/29/1991 1991 10 29 151 27 38 32.5 0.5 6120.5
10/30/1991 1991 10 30 152 28 40 34 2 6122.5
10/31/1991 1991 10 31 153 17 42 29.5 -2.5 6120
11/1/1991 1991 11 1 154 23 46 34.5 2.5 6122.5
11/2/1991 1991 11 2 155 28 42 35 3 6125.5
11/3/1991 1991 11 3 156 18 38 28 -4 6121.5
11/4/1991 1991 11 4 157 27 48 37.5 5.5 6127
11/5/1991 1991 11 5 158 38 56 47 15 6142
11/6/1991 1991 11 6 159 32 63 47.5 15.5 6157.5
11/7/1991 1991 11 7 160 41 62 51.5 19.5 6177
11/8/1991 1991 11 8 161 42 57 49.5 17.5 6194.5
11/9/1991 1991 11 9 162 42 55 48.5 16.5 6211
11/10/1991 1991 11 10 163 50 55 52.5 20.5 6231.5
11/11/1991 1991 11 11 164 35 62 48.5 16.5 6248
11/12/1991 1991 11 12 165 37 59 48 16 6264
11/13/1991 1991 11 13 166 23 53 38 6 6270
11/14/1991 1991 11 14 167 22 49 35.5 3.5 6273.5
11/15/1991 1991 11 15 168 37 46 41.5 9.5 6283
11/16/1991 1991 11 16 169 36 51 43.5 11.5 6294.5
11/17/1991 1991 11 17 170 29 52 40.5 8.5 6303
11/18/1991 1991 11 18 171 39 48 43.5 11.5 6314.5
11/19/1991 1991 11 19 172 29 45 37 5 6319.5
11/20/1991 1991 11 20 173 25 45 35 3 6322.5
11/21/1991 1991 11 21 174 35 45 40 8 6330.5
11/22/1991 1991 11 22 175 28 44 36 4 6334.5
11/23/1991 1991 11 23 176 12 38 25 -7 6327.5
11/24/1991 1991 11 24 177 18 41 29.5 -2.5 6325
11/25/1991 1991 11 25 178 22 40 31 -1 6324
11/26/1991 1991 11 26 179 18 45 31.5 -0.5 6323.5
11/27/1991 1991 11 27 180 23 58 40.5 8.5 6332
11/28/1991 1991 11 28 181 32 40 36 4 6336
11/29/1991 1991 11 29 182 32 40 36 4 6340
11/30/1991 1991 11 30 183 18 40 29 -3 6337
12/1/1991 1991 12 1 184 9 36 22.5 -9.5 6327.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
12/2/1991 1991 12 2 185 18 43 30.5 -1.5 6326
12/3/1991 1991 12 3 186 19 40 29.5 -2.5 6323.5
12/4/1991 1991 12 4 187 17 41 29 -3 6320.5
12/5/1991 1991 12 5 188 15 39 27 -5 6315.5
12/6/1991 1991 12 6 189 18 42 30 -2 6313.5
12/7/1991 1991 12 7 190 12 40 26 -6 6307.5
12/8/1991 1991 12 8 191 22 42 32 0 6307.5
12/9/1991 1991 12 9 192 23 43 33 1 6308.5
12/10/1991 1991 12 10 193 14 38 26 -6 6302.5
12/11/1991 1991 12 11 194 27 36 31.5 -0.5 6302
12/12/1991 1991 12 12 195 28 32 30 -2 6300
12/13/1991 1991 12 13 196 25 34 29.5 -2.5 6297.5
12/14/1991 1991 12 14 197 22 26 24 -8 6289.5
12/15/1991 1991 12 15 198 28 30 29 -3 6286.5
12/16/1991 1991 12 16 199 27 29 28 -4 6282.5
12/17/1991 1991 12 17 200 25 30 27.5 -4.5 6278
12/18/1991 1991 12 18 201 24 32 28 -4 6274
12/19/1991 1991 12 19 202 29 34 31.5 -0.5 6273.5
12/20/1991 1991 12 20 203 10 36 23 -9 6264.5
12/21/1991 1991 12 21 204 7 27 17 -15 6249.5
12/22/1991 1991 12 22 205 22 25 23.5 -8.5 6241
12/23/1991 1991 12 23 206 24 27 25.5 -6.5 6234.5
12/24/1991 1991 12 24 207 22 25 23.5 -8.5 6226
12/25/1991 1991 12 25 208 22 25 23.5 -8.5 6217.5
12/26/1991 1991 12 26 209 22 26 24 -8 6209.5
12/27/1991 1991 12 27 210 22 26 24 -8 6201.5
12/28/1991 1991 12 28 211 22 27 24.5 -7.5 6194
12/29/1991 1991 12 29 212 22 32 27 -5 6189
12/30/1991 1991 12 30 213 27 32 29.5 -2.5 6186.5
12/31/1991 1991 12 31 214 25 29 27 -5 6181.5
1/1/1992 1992 1 1 215 19 25 22 -10 6171.5
1/2/1992 1992 1 2 216 12 26 19 -13 6158.5
1/3/1992 1992 1 3 217 13 22 17.5 -14.5 6144
1/4/1992 1992 1 4 218 20 29 24.5 -7.5 6136.5
1/5/1992 1992 1 5 219 25 34 29.5 -2.5 6134
1/6/1992 1992 1 6 220 18 34 26 -6 6128
1/7/1992 1992 1 7 221 8 25 16.5 -15.5 6112.5
1/8/1992 1992 1 8 222 -2 23 10.5 -21.5 6091
1/9/1992 1992 1 9 223 -7 22 7.5 -24.5 6066.5
1/10/1992 1992 1 10 224 14 22 18 -14 6052.5
1/11/1992 1992 1 11 225 0 21 10.5 -21.5 6031
1/12/1992 1992 1 12 226 3 28 15.5 -16.5 6014.5
1/13/1992 1992 1 13 227 -1 22 10.5 -21.5 5993
1/14/1992 1992 1 14 228 -8 20 6 -26 5967
1/15/1992 1992 1 15 229 -5 26 10.5 -21.5 5945.5
1/16/1992 1992 1 16 230 -6 19 6.5 -25.5 5920
1/17/1992 1992 1 17 231 -5 20 7.5 -24.5 5895.5
1/18/1992 1992 1 18 232 -10 18 4 -28 5867.5
1/19/1992 1992 1 19 233 -13 19 3 -29 5838.5
1/20/1992 1992 1 20 234 -14 14 0 -32 5806.5
1/21/1992 1992 1 21 235 -15 20 2.5 -29.5 5777
1/22/1992 1992 1 22 236 -11 22 5.5 -26.5 5750.5
1/23/1992 1992 1 23 237 8 25 16.5 -15.5 5735
1/24/1992 1992 1 24 238 -5 27 11 -21 5714
1/25/1992 1992 1 25 239 -2 24 11 -21 5693
1/26/1992 1992 1 26 240 -6 27 10.5 -21.5 5671.5
1/27/1992 1992 1 27 241 -6 24 9 -23 5648.5
1/28/1992 1992 1 28 242 -5 25 10 -22 5626.5
1/29/1992 1992 1 29 243 -6 17 5.5 -26.5 5600
1/30/1992 1992 1 30 244 -5 25 10 -22 5578
1/31/1992 1992 1 31 245 -1 28 13.5 -18.5 5559.5
2/1/1992 1992 2 1 246 -2 26 12 -20 5539.5
2/2/1992 1992 2 2 247 0 35 17.5 -14.5 5525
2/3/1992 1992 2 3 248 2 39 20.5 -11.5 5513.5
2/4/1992 1992 2 4 249 16 41 28.5 -3.5 5510
2/5/1992 1992 2 5 250 3 35 19 -13 5497
2/6/1992 1992 2 6 251 9 34 21.5 -10.5 5486.5
2/7/1992 1992 2 7 252 10 34 22 -10 5476.5
2/8/1992 1992 2 8 253 25 42 33.5 1.5 5478
2/9/1992 1992 2 9 254 31 46 38.5 6.5 5484.5
2/10/1992 1992 2 10 255 25 40 32.5 0.5 5485
2/11/1992 1992 2 11 256 25 45 35 3 5488
2/12/1992 1992 2 12 257 30 39 34.5 2.5 5490.5
2/13/1992 1992 2 13 258 34 37 35.5 3.5 5494
2/14/1992 1992 2 14 259 30 46 38 6 5500
2/15/1992 1992 2 15 260 32 40 36 4 5504
2/16/1992 1992 2 16 261 32 45 38.5 6.5 5510.5
2/17/1992 1992 2 17 262 24 50 37 5 5515.5
2/18/1992 1992 2 18 263 25 46 35.5 3.5 5519
2/19/1992 1992 2 19 264 24 48 36 4 5523
2/20/1992 1992 2 20 265 29 47 38 6 5529
2/21/1992 1992 2 21 266 28 55 41.5 9.5 5538.5
2/22/1992 1992 2 22 267 35 54 44.5 12.5 5551
2/23/1992 1992 2 23 268 28 51 39.5 7.5 5558.5
2/24/1992 1992 2 24 269 25 50 37.5 5.5 5564
2/25/1992 1992 2 25 270 32 54 43 11 5575
2/26/1992 1992 2 26 271 22 54 38 6 5581
2/27/1992 1992 2 27 272 23 59 41 9 5590
2/28/1992 1992 2 28 273 26 61 43.5 11.5 5601.5
2/29/1992 1992 2 29 274 25 58 41.5 9.5 5611
3/1/1992 1992 3 1 275 30 61 45.5 13.5 5624.5
3/2/1992 1992 3 2 276 34 62 48 16 5640.5
3/3/1992 1992 3 3 277 37 54 45.5 13.5 5654
3/4/1992 1992 3 4 278 30 56 43 11 5665
3/5/1992 1992 3 5 279 46 61 53.5 21.5 5686.5
3/6/1992 1992 3 6 280 31 62 46.5 14.5 5701
3/7/1992 1992 3 7 281 31 60 45.5 13.5 5714.5
3/8/1992 1992 3 8 282 38 50 44 12 5726.5
3/9/1992 1992 3 9 283 35 51 43 11 5737.5
3/10/1992 1992 3 10 284 25 57 41 9 5746.5
3/11/1992 1992 3 11 285 25 60 42.5 10.5 5757
3/12/1992 1992 3 12 286 28 64 46 14 5771
3/13/1992 1992 3 13 287 28 70 49 17 5788
3/14/1992 1992 3 14 288 44 68 56 24 5812
3/15/1992 1992 3 15 289 38 57 47.5 15.5 5827.5
3/16/1992 1992 3 16 290 32 65 48.5 16.5 5844
3/17/1992 1992 3 17 291 45 60 52.5 20.5 5864.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
3/18/1992 1992 3 18 292 32 57 44.5 12.5 5877
3/19/1992 1992 3 19 293 29 54 41.5 9.5 5886.5
3/20/1992 1992 3 20 294 32 61 46.5 14.5 5901
3/21/1992 1992 3 21 295 42 59 50.5 18.5 5919.5
3/22/1992 1992 3 22 296 38 57 47.5 15.5 5935
3/23/1992 1992 3 23 297 42 54 48 16 5951
3/24/1992 1992 3 24 298 26 62 44 12 5963
3/25/1992 1992 3 25 299 32 64 48 16 5979
3/26/1992 1992 3 26 300 40 65 52.5 20.5 5999.5
3/27/1992 1992 3 27 301 46 54 50 18 6017.5
3/28/1992 1992 3 28 302 44 58 51 19 6036.5
3/29/1992 1992 3 29 303 46 60 53 21 6057.5
3/30/1992 1992 3 30 304 42 56 49 17 6074.5
3/31/1992 1992 3 31 305 46 60 53 21 6095.5
4/1/1992 1992 4 1 306 46 60 53 21 6116.5
4/2/1992 1992 4 2 307 35 69 52 20 6136.5
4/3/1992 1992 4 3 308 37 72 54.5 22.5 6159
4/4/1992 1992 4 4 309 41 77 59 27 6186
4/5/1992 1992 4 5 310 45 74 59.5 27.5 6213.5
4/6/1992 1992 4 6 311 48 72 60 28 6241.5
4/7/1992 1992 4 7 312 47 74 60.5 28.5 6270
4/8/1992 1992 4 8 313 46 75 60.5 28.5 6298.5
4/9/1992 1992 4 9 314 45 78 61.5 29.5 6328
4/10/1992 1992 4 10 315 50 78 64 32 6360
4/11/1992 1992 4 11 316 54 83 68.5 36.5 6396.5
4/12/1992 1992 4 12 317 57 82 69.5 37.5 6434
4/13/1992 1992 4 13 318 52 77 64.5 32.5 6466.5
4/14/1992 1992 4 14 319 52 77 64.5 32.5 6499
4/15/1992 1992 4 15 320 52 64 58 26 6525
4/16/1992 1992 4 16 321 48 74 61 29 6554
4/17/1992 1992 4 17 322 46 80 63 31 6585
4/18/1992 1992 4 18 323 42 60 51 19 6604
4/19/1992 1992 4 19 324 45 63 54 22 6626
4/20/1992 1992 4 20 325 40 68 54 22 6648
4/21/1992 1992 4 21 326 44 75 59.5 27.5 6675.5
4/22/1992 1992 4 22 327 50 70 60 28 6703.5
4/23/1992 1992 4 23 328 48 70 59 27 6730.5
4/24/1992 1992 4 24 329 39 72 55.5 23.5 6754
4/25/1992 1992 4 25 330 40 76 58 26 6780
4/26/1992 1992 4 26 331 40 87 63.5 31.5 6811.5
4/27/1992 1992 4 27 332 50 90 70 38 6849.5
4/28/1992 1992 4 28 333 50 90 70 38 6887.5
4/29/1992 1992 4 29 334 58 89 73.5 41.5 6929
4/30/1992 1992 4 30 335 57 87 72 40 6969
5/1/1992 1992 5 1 336 62 86 74 42 7011
5/2/1992 1992 5 2 337 46 79 62.5 30.5 7041.5
5/3/1992 1992 5 3 338 55 85 70 38 7079.5
5/4/1992 1992 5 4 339 58 85 71.5 39.5 7119
5/5/1992 1992 5 5 340 52 84 68 36 7155
5/6/1992 1992 5 6 341 60 80 70 38 7193
5/7/1992 1992 5 7 342 54 76 65 33 7226
5/8/1992 1992 5 8 343 58 77 67.5 35.5 7261.5
5/9/1992 1992 5 9 344 55 66 60.5 28.5 7290
5/10/1992 1992 5 10 345 40 68 54 22 7312
5/11/1992 1992 5 11 346 40 84 62 30 7342
5/12/1992 1992 5 12 347 55 80 67.5 35.5 7377.5
5/13/1992 1992 5 13 348 47 85 66 34 7411.5
5/14/1992 1992 5 14 349 52 87 69.5 37.5 7449
5/15/1992 1992 5 15 350 53 88 70.5 38.5 7487.5
5/16/1992 1992 5 16 351 67 85 76 44 7531.5
5/17/1992 1992 5 17 352 60 92 76 44 7575.5
5/18/1992 1992 5 18 353 53 89 71 39 7614.5
5/19/1992 1992 5 19 354 57 86 71.5 39.5 7654
5/20/1992 1992 5 20 355 53 72 62.5 30.5 7684.5
5/21/1992 1992 5 21 356 54 65 59.5 27.5 7712
5/22/1992 1992 5 22 357 49 72 60.5 28.5 7740.5
5/23/1992 1992 5 23 358 56 78 67 35 7775.5
5/24/1992 1992 5 24 359 56 74 65 33 7808.5
5/25/1992 1992 5 25 360 55 76 65.5 33.5 7842
5/26/1992 1992 5 26 361 58 79 68.5 36.5 7878.5
5/27/1992 1992 5 27 362 57 78 67.5 35.5 7914
5/28/1992 1992 5 28 363 50 80 65 33 7947
5/29/1992 1992 5 29 364 60 72 66 34 7981
5/30/1992 1992 5 30 365 52 79 65.5 33.5 8014.5
5/31/1992 1992 5 31 366 52 83 67.5 35.5 8050
6/1/1992 1992 6 1 1 63 78 70.5 38.5 38.5
6/2/1992 1992 6 2 2 63 89 76 44 82.5
6/3/1992 1992 6 3 3 64 84 74 42 124.5
6/4/1992 1992 6 4 4 65 92 78.5 46.5 171
6/5/1992 1992 6 5 5 65 85 75 43 214
6/6/1992 1992 6 6 6 55 89 72 40 254
6/7/1992 1992 6 7 7 53 89 71 39 293
6/8/1992 1992 6 8 8 65 81 73 41 334
6/9/1992 1992 6 9 9 53 82 67.5 35.5 369.5
6/10/1992 1992 6 10 10 55 92 73.5 41.5 411
6/11/1992 1992 6 11 11 65 89 77 45 456
6/12/1992 1992 6 12 12 67 92 79.5 47.5 503.5
6/13/1992 1992 6 13 13 62 82 72 40 543.5
6/14/1992 1992 6 14 14 63 85 74 42 585.5
6/15/1992 1992 6 15 15 58 73 65.5 33.5 619
6/16/1992 1992 6 16 16 60 75 67.5 35.5 654.5
6/17/1992 1992 6 17 17 58 81 69.5 37.5 692
6/18/1992 1992 6 18 18 47 94 70.5 38.5 730.5
6/19/1992 1992 6 19 19 48 96 72 40 770.5
6/20/1992 1992 6 20 20 52 96 74 42 812.5
6/21/1992 1992 6 21 21 54 97 75.5 43.5 856
6/22/1992 1992 6 22 22 68 97 82.5 50.5 906.5
6/23/1992 1992 6 23 23 57 97 77 45 951.5
6/24/1992 1992 6 24 24 65 97 81 49 1000.5
6/25/1992 1992 6 25 25 62 81 71.5 39.5 1040
6/26/1992 1992 6 26 26 55 85 70 38 1078
6/27/1992 1992 6 27 27 62 90 76 44 1122
6/28/1992 1992 6 28 28 72 95 83.5 51.5 1173.5
6/29/1992 1992 6 29 29 60 95 77.5 45.5 1219
6/30/1992 1992 6 30 30 77 92 84.5 52.5 1271.5
7/1/1992 1992 7 1 31 62 85 73.5 41.5 1313
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
7/2/1992 1992 7 2 32 50 83 66.5 34.5 1347.5
7/3/1992 1992 7 3 33 50 95 72.5 40.5 1388
7/4/1992 1992 7 4 34 65 92 78.5 46.5 1434.5
7/5/1992 1992 7 5 35 64 97 80.5 48.5 1483
7/6/1992 1992 7 6 36 77 103 90 58 1541
7/7/1992 1992 7 7 37 70 84 77 45 1586
7/8/1992 1992 7 8 38 67 82 74.5 42.5 1628.5
7/9/1992 1992 7 9 39 55 90 72.5 40.5 1669
7/10/1992 1992 7 10 40 69 98 83.5 51.5 1720.5
7/11/1992 1992 7 11 41 65 84 74.5 42.5 1763
7/12/1992 1992 7 12 42 65 75 70 38 1801
7/13/1992 1992 7 13 43 57 81 69 37 1838
7/14/1992 1992 7 14 44 58 88 73 41 1879
7/15/1992 1992 7 15 45 62 87 74.5 42.5 1921.5
7/16/1992 1992 7 16 46 62 90 76 44 1965.5
7/17/1992 1992 7 17 47 60 90 75 43 2008.5
7/18/1992 1992 7 18 48 72 94 83 51 2059.5
7/19/1992 1992 7 19 49 62 95 78.5 46.5 2106
7/20/1992 1992 7 20 50 65 99 82 50 2156
7/21/1992 1992 7 21 51 77 99 88 56 2212
7/22/1992 1992 7 22 52 65 93 79 47 2259
7/23/1992 1992 7 23 53 77 91 84 52 2311
7/24/1992 1992 7 24 54 68 85 76.5 44.5 2355.5
7/25/1992 1992 7 25 55 65 85 75 43 2398.5
7/26/1992 1992 7 26 56 68 91 79.5 47.5 2446
7/27/1992 1992 7 27 57 68 93 80.5 48.5 2494.5
7/28/1992 1992 7 28 58 75 95 85 53 2547.5
7/29/1992 1992 7 29 59 60 92 76 44 2591.5
7/30/1992 1992 7 30 60 60 98 79 47 2638.5
7/31/1992 1992 7 31 61 61 95 78 46 2684.5
8/1/1992 1992 8 1 62 63 104 83.5 51.5 2736
8/2/1992 1992 8 2 63 60 101 80.5 48.5 2784.5
8/3/1992 1992 8 3 64 73 100 86.5 54.5 2839
8/4/1992 1992 8 4 65 74 98 86 54 2893
8/5/1992 1992 8 5 66 71 86 78.5 46.5 2939.5
8/6/1992 1992 8 6 67 62 80 71 39 2978.5
8/7/1992 1992 8 7 68 65 85 75 43 3021.5
8/8/1992 1992 8 8 69 62 91 76.5 44.5 3066
8/9/1992 1992 8 9 70 61 98 79.5 47.5 3113.5
8/10/1992 1992 8 10 71 70 87 78.5 46.5 3160
8/11/1992 1992 8 11 72 68 92 80 48 3208
8/12/1992 1992 8 12 73 72 93 82.5 50.5 3258.5
8/13/1992 1992 8 13 74 69 100 84.5 52.5 3311
8/14/1992 1992 8 14 75 65 95 80 48 3359
8/15/1992 1992 8 15 76 68 97 82.5 50.5 3409.5
8/16/1992 1992 8 16 77 72 97 84.5 52.5 3462
8/17/1992 1992 8 17 78 69 92 80.5 48.5 3510.5
8/18/1992 1992 8 18 79 65 94 79.5 47.5 3558
8/19/1992 1992 8 19 80 65 97 81 49 3607
8/20/1992 1992 8 20 81 63 100 81.5 49.5 3656.5
8/21/1992 1992 8 21 82 67 92 79.5 47.5 3704
8/22/1992 1992 8 22 83 70 93 81.5 49.5 3753.5
8/23/1992 1992 8 23 84 63 79 71 39 3792.5
8/24/1992 1992 8 24 85 62 82 72 40 3832.5
8/25/1992 1992 8 25 86 57 86 71.5 39.5 3872
8/26/1992 1992 8 26 87 53 83 68 36 3908
8/27/1992 1992 8 27 88 40 58 49 17 3925
8/28/1992 1992 8 28 89 44 92 68 36 3961
8/29/1992 1992 8 29 90 55 90 72.5 40.5 4001.5
8/30/1992 1992 8 30 91 57 83 70 38 4039.5
8/31/1992 1992 8 31 92 57 75 66 34 4073.5
9/1/1992 1992 9 1 93 48 81 64.5 32.5 4106
9/2/1992 1992 9 2 94 53 82 67.5 35.5 4141.5
9/3/1992 1992 9 3 95 57 87 72 40 4181.5
9/4/1992 1992 9 4 96 60 80 70 38 4219.5
9/5/1992 1992 9 5 97 44 79 61.5 29.5 4249
9/6/1992 1992 9 6 98 54 81 67.5 35.5 4284.5
9/7/1992 1992 9 7 99 63 84 73.5 41.5 4326
9/8/1992 1992 9 8 100 50 89 69.5 37.5 4363.5
9/9/1992 1992 9 9 101 53 88 70.5 38.5 4402
9/10/1992 1992 9 10 102 54 91 72.5 40.5 4442.5
9/11/1992 1992 9 11 103 52 88 70 38 4480.5
9/12/1992 1992 9 12 104 65 85 75 43 4523.5
9/13/1992 1992 9 13 105 58 85 71.5 39.5 4563
9/14/1992 1992 9 14 106 53 90 71.5 39.5 4602.5
9/15/1992 1992 9 15 107 65 87 76 44 4646.5
9/16/1992 1992 9 16 108 60 87 73.5 41.5 4688
9/17/1992 1992 9 17 109 56 85 70.5 38.5 4726.5
9/18/1992 1992 9 18 110 60 78 69 37 4763.5
9/19/1992 1992 9 19 111 59 71 65 33 4796.5
9/20/1992 1992 9 20 112 59 87 73 41 4837.5
9/21/1992 1992 9 21 113 52 85 68.5 36.5 4874
9/22/1992 1992 9 22 114 50 92 71 39 4913
9/23/1992 1992 9 23 115 50 89 69.5 37.5 4950.5
9/24/1992 1992 9 24 116 61 85 73 41 4991.5
9/25/1992 1992 9 25 117 57 80 68.5 36.5 5028
9/26/1992 1992 9 26 118 38 77 57.5 25.5 5053.5
9/27/1992 1992 9 27 119 37 75 56 24 5077.5
9/28/1992 1992 9 28 120 44 85 64.5 32.5 5110
9/29/1992 1992 9 29 121 42 85 63.5 31.5 5141.5
9/30/1992 1992 9 30 122 42 78 60 28 5169.5
10/1/1992 1992 10 1 123 39 82 60.5 28.5 5198
10/2/1992 1992 10 2 124 60 84 72 40 5238
10/3/1992 1992 10 3 125 64 78 71 39 5277
10/4/1992 1992 10 4 126 47 75 61 29 5306
10/5/1992 1992 10 5 127 35 75 55 23 5329
10/6/1992 1992 10 6 128 45 75 60 28 5357
10/7/1992 1992 10 7 129 38 60 49 17 5374
10/8/1992 1992 10 8 130 29 67 48 16 5390
10/9/1992 1992 10 9 131 37 72 54.5 22.5 5412.5
10/10/1992 1992 10 10 132 42 72 57 25 5437.5
10/11/1992 1992 10 11 133 35 73 54 22 5459.5
10/12/1992 1992 10 12 134 40 82 61 29 5488.5
10/13/1992 1992 10 13 135 38 82 60 28 5516.5
10/14/1992 1992 10 14 136 45 80 62.5 30.5 5547
10/15/1992 1992 10 15 137 55 75 65 33 5580
10/16/1992 1992 10 16 138 48 75 61.5 29.5 5609.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
10/17/1992 1992 10 17 139 40 75 57.5 25.5 5635
10/18/1992 1992 10 18 140 37 77 57 25 5660
10/19/1992 1992 10 19 141 45 78 61.5 29.5 5689.5
10/20/1992 1992 10 20 142 38 76 57 25 5714.5
10/21/1992 1992 10 21 143 50 74 62 30 5744.5
10/22/1992 1992 10 22 144 52 70 61 29 5773.5
10/23/1992 1992 10 23 145 40 74 57 25 5798.5
10/24/1992 1992 10 24 146 42 72 57 25 5823.5
10/25/1992 1992 10 25 147 50 62 56 24 5847.5
10/26/1992 1992 10 26 148 42 63 52.5 20.5 5868
10/27/1992 1992 10 27 149 44 58 51 19 5887
10/28/1992 1992 10 28 150 46 61 53.5 21.5 5908.5
10/29/1992 1992 10 29 151 45 65 55 23 5931.5
10/30/1992 1992 10 30 152 49 60 54.5 22.5 5954
10/31/1992 1992 10 31 153 42 55 48.5 16.5 5970.5
11/1/1992 1992 11 1 154 30 58 44 12 5982.5
11/2/1992 1992 11 2 155 34 58 46 14 5996.5
11/3/1992 1992 11 3 156 35 44 39.5 7.5 6004
11/4/1992 1992 11 4 157 22 45 33.5 1.5 6005.5
11/5/1992 1992 11 5 158 29 52 40.5 8.5 6014
11/6/1992 1992 11 6 159 22 50 36 4 6018
11/7/1992 1992 11 7 160 27 55 41 9 6027
11/8/1992 1992 11 8 161 23 54 38.5 6.5 6033.5
11/9/1992 1992 11 9 162 34 54 44 12 6045.5
11/10/1992 1992 11 10 163 27 40 33.5 1.5 6047
11/11/1992 1992 11 11 164 19 47 33 1 6048
11/12/1992 1992 11 12 165 18 46 32 0 6048
11/13/1992 1992 11 13 166 30 49 39.5 7.5 6055.5
11/14/1992 1992 11 14 167 30 51 40.5 8.5 6064
11/15/1992 1992 11 15 168 22 54 38 6 6070
11/16/1992 1992 11 16 169 25 53 39 7 6077
11/17/1992 1992 11 17 170 23 52 37.5 5.5 6082.5
11/18/1992 1992 11 18 171 28 57 42.5 10.5 6093
11/19/1992 1992 11 19 172 25 53 39 7 6100
11/20/1992 1992 11 20 173 34 40 37 5 6105
11/21/1992 1992 11 21 174 22 44 33 1 6106
11/22/1992 1992 11 22 175 36 46 41 9 6115
11/23/1992 1992 11 23 176 23 42 32.5 0.5 6115.5
11/24/1992 1992 11 24 177 18 39 28.5 -3.5 6112
11/25/1992 1992 11 25 178 10 37 23.5 -8.5 6103.5
11/26/1992 1992 11 26 179 10 39 24.5 -7.5 6096
11/27/1992 1992 11 27 180 6 38 22 -10 6086
11/28/1992 1992 11 28 181 22 43 32.5 0.5 6086.5
11/29/1992 1992 11 29 182 22 43 32.5 0.5 6087
11/30/1992 1992 11 30 183 10 35 22.5 -9.5 6077.5
12/1/1992 1992 12 1 184 14 43 28.5 -3.5 6074
12/2/1992 1992 12 2 185 18 39 28.5 -3.5 6070.5
12/3/1992 1992 12 3 186 12 48 30 -2 6068.5
12/4/1992 1992 12 4 187 22 36 29 -3 6065.5
12/5/1992 1992 12 5 188 21 32 26.5 -5.5 6060
12/6/1992 1992 12 6 189 15 38 26.5 -5.5 6054.5
12/7/1992 1992 12 7 190 27 34 30.5 -1.5 6053
12/8/1992 1992 12 8 191 19 38 28.5 -3.5 6049.5
12/9/1992 1992 12 9 192 21 47 34 2 6051.5
12/10/1992 1992 12 10 193 21 37 29 -3 6048.5
12/11/1992 1992 12 11 194 27 37 32 0 6048.5
12/12/1992 1992 12 12 195 24 38 31 -1 6047.5
12/13/1992 1992 12 13 196 22 40 31 -1 6046.5
12/14/1992 1992 12 14 197 8 37 22.5 -9.5 6037
12/15/1992 1992 12 15 198 24 34 29 -3 6034
12/16/1992 1992 12 16 199 10 38 24 -8 6026
12/17/1992 1992 12 17 200 21 39 30 -2 6024
12/18/1992 1992 12 18 201 13 31 22 -10 6014
12/19/1992 1992 12 19 202 3 26 14.5 -17.5 5996.5
12/20/1992 1992 12 20 203 0 26 13 -19 5977.5
12/21/1992 1992 12 21 204 0 27 13.5 -18.5 5959
12/22/1992 1992 12 22 205 2 32 17 -15 5944
12/23/1992 1992 12 23 206 2 30 16 -16 5928
12/24/1992 1992 12 24 207 2 35 18.5 -13.5 5914.5
12/25/1992 1992 12 25 208 3 34 18.5 -13.5 5901
12/26/1992 1992 12 26 209 0 32 16 -16 5885
12/27/1992 1992 12 27 210 2 28 15 -17 5868
12/28/1992 1992 12 28 211 16 33 24.5 -7.5 5860.5
12/29/1992 1992 12 29 212 17 45 31 -1 5859.5
12/30/1992 1992 12 30 213 30 46 38 6 5865.5
12/31/1992 1992 12 31 214 18 34 26 -6 5859.5
1/1/1993 1993 1 1 215 21 38 29.5 -2.5 5857
1/2/1993 1993 1 2 216 36 48 42 10 5867
1/3/1993 1993 1 3 217 15 31 23 -9 5858
1/4/1993 1993 1 4 218 3 26 14.5 -17.5 5840.5
1/5/1993 1993 1 5 219 5 32 18.5 -13.5 5827
1/6/1993 1993 1 6 220 20 32 26 -6 5821
1/7/1993 1993 1 7 221 25 35 30 -2 5819
1/8/1993 1993 1 8 222 25 38 31.5 -0.5 5818.5
1/9/1993 1993 1 9 223 26 42 34 2 5820.5
1/10/1993 1993 1 10 224 38 43 40.5 8.5 5829
1/11/1993 1993 1 11 225 22 42 32 0 5829
1/12/1993 1993 1 12 226 14 35 24.5 -7.5 5821.5
1/13/1993 1993 1 13 227 25 32 28.5 -3.5 5818
1/14/1993 1993 1 14 228 28 34 31 -1 5817
1/15/1993 1993 1 15 229 33 39 36 4 5821
1/16/1993 1993 1 16 230 26 38 32 0 5821
1/17/1993 1993 1 17 231 38 45 41.5 9.5 5830.5
1/18/1993 1993 1 18 232 35 42 38.5 6.5 5837
1/19/1993 1993 1 19 233 32 51 41.5 9.5 5846.5
1/20/1993 1993 1 20 234 23 44 33.5 1.5 5848
1/21/1993 1993 1 21 235 30 43 36.5 4.5 5852.5
1/22/1993 1993 1 22 236 28 50 39 7 5859.5
1/23/1993 1993 1 23 237 24 38 31 -1 5858.5
1/24/1993 1993 1 24 238 23 44 33.5 1.5 5860
1/25/1993 1993 1 25 239 17 42 29.5 -2.5 5857.5
1/26/1993 1993 1 26 240 18 42 30 -2 5855.5
1/27/1993 1993 1 27 241 21 43 32 0 5855.5
1/28/1993 1993 1 28 242 16 46 31 -1 5854.5
1/29/1993 1993 1 29 243 20 40 30 -2 5852.5
1/30/1993 1993 1 30 244 32 40 36 4 5856.5
1/31/1993 1993 1 31 245 34 35 34.5 2.5 5859
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
2/1/1993 1993 2 1 246 30 39 34.5 2.5 5861.5
2/2/1993 1993 2 2 247 25 48 36.5 4.5 5866
2/3/1993 1993 2 3 248 24 46 35 3 5869
2/4/1993 1993 2 4 249 23 44 33.5 1.5 5870.5
2/5/1993 1993 2 5 250 21 42 31.5 -0.5 5870
2/6/1993 1993 2 6 251 28 44 36 4 5874
2/7/1993 1993 2 7 252 32 39 35.5 3.5 5877.5
2/8/1993 1993 2 8 253 34 36 35 3 5880.5
2/9/1993 1993 2 9 254 35 49 42 10 5890.5
2/10/1993 1993 2 10 255 28 50 39 7 5897.5
2/11/1993 1993 2 11 256 26 52 39 7 5904.5
2/12/1993 1993 2 12 257 25 51 38 6 5910.5
2/13/1993 1993 2 13 258 24 44 34 2 5912.5
2/14/1993 1993 2 14 259 22 40 31 -1 5911.5
2/15/1993 1993 2 15 260 20 46 33 1 5912.5
2/16/1993 1993 2 16 261 30 43 36.5 4.5 5917
2/17/1993 1993 2 17 262 31 48 39.5 7.5 5924.5
2/18/1993 1993 2 18 263 22 42 32 0 5924.5
2/19/1993 1993 2 19 264 30 58 44 12 5936.5
2/20/1993 1993 2 20 265 35 52 43.5 11.5 5948
2/21/1993 1993 2 21 266 23 46 34.5 2.5 5950.5
2/22/1993 1993 2 22 267 21 48 34.5 2.5 5953
2/23/1993 1993 2 23 268 24 52 38 6 5959
2/24/1993 1993 2 24 269 38 52 45 13 5972
2/25/1993 1993 2 25 270 27 46 36.5 4.5 5976.5
2/26/1993 1993 2 26 271 23 47 35 3 5979.5
2/27/1993 1993 2 27 272 37 48 42.5 10.5 5990
2/28/1993 1993 2 28 273 38 46 42 10 6000
3/1/1993 1993 3 1 274 26 55 40.5 8.5 6008.5
3/2/1993 1993 3 2 275 23 55 39 7 6015.5
3/3/1993 1993 3 3 276 17 50 33.5 1.5 6017
3/4/1993 1993 3 4 277 18 55 36.5 4.5 6021.5
3/5/1993 1993 3 5 278 22 60 41 9 6030.5
3/6/1993 1993 3 6 279 25 57 41 9 6039.5
3/7/1993 1993 3 7 280 23 65 44 12 6051.5
3/8/1993 1993 3 8 281 22 67 44.5 12.5 6064
3/9/1993 1993 3 9 282 25 67 46 14 6078
3/10/1993 1993 3 10 283 40 66 53 21 6099
3/11/1993 1993 3 11 284 42 60 51 19 6118
3/12/1993 1993 3 12 285 30 46 38 6 6124
3/13/1993 1993 3 13 286 25 53 39 7 6131
3/14/1993 1993 3 14 287 28 58 43 11 6142
3/15/1993 1993 3 15 288 36 64 50 18 6160
3/16/1993 1993 3 16 289 41 65 53 21 6181
3/17/1993 1993 3 17 290 39 69 54 22 6203
3/18/1993 1993 3 18 291 45 64 54.5 22.5 6225.5
3/19/1993 1993 3 19 292 30 64 47 15 6240.5
3/20/1993 1993 3 20 293 33 67 50 18 6258.5
3/21/1993 1993 3 21 294 35 66 50.5 18.5 6277
3/22/1993 1993 3 22 295 30 67 48.5 16.5 6293.5
3/23/1993 1993 3 23 296 25 74 49.5 17.5 6311
3/24/1993 1993 3 24 297 38 68 53 21 6332
3/25/1993 1993 3 25 298 39 72 55.5 23.5 6355.5
3/26/1993 1993 3 26 299 42 72 57 25 6380.5
3/27/1993 1993 3 27 300 42 55 48.5 16.5 6397
3/28/1993 1993 3 28 301 36 55 45.5 13.5 6410.5
3/29/1993 1993 3 29 302 37 57 47 15 6425.5
3/30/1993 1993 3 30 303 32 56 44 12 6437.5
3/31/1993 1993 3 31 304 33 62 47.5 15.5 6453
4/1/1993 1993 4 1 305 35 69 52 20 6473
4/2/1993 1993 4 2 306 43 57 50 18 6491
4/3/1993 1993 4 3 307 38 63 50.5 18.5 6509.5
4/4/1993 1993 4 4 308 33 71 52 20 6529.5
4/5/1993 1993 4 5 309 42 67 54.5 22.5 6552
4/6/1993 1993 4 6 310 40 53 46.5 14.5 6566.5
4/7/1993 1993 4 7 311 45 55 50 18 6584.5
4/8/1993 1993 4 8 312 32 65 48.5 16.5 6601
4/9/1993 1993 4 9 313 36 71 53.5 21.5 6622.5
4/10/1993 1993 4 10 314 44 65 54.5 22.5 6645
4/11/1993 1993 4 11 315 36 71 53.5 21.5 6666.5
4/12/1993 1993 4 12 316 40 65 52.5 20.5 6687
4/13/1993 1993 4 13 317 33 58 45.5 13.5 6700.5
4/14/1993 1993 4 14 318 27 55 41 9 6709.5
4/15/1993 1993 4 15 319 29 68 48.5 16.5 6726
4/16/1993 1993 4 16 320 56 63 59.5 27.5 6753.5
4/17/1993 1993 4 17 321 48 74 61 29 6782.5
4/18/1993 1993 4 18 322 46 72 59 27 6809.5
4/19/1993 1993 4 19 323 42 59 50.5 18.5 6828
4/20/1993 1993 4 20 324 29 70 49.5 17.5 6845.5
4/21/1993 1993 4 21 325 37 76 56.5 24.5 6870
4/22/1993 1993 4 22 326 44 72 58 26 6896
4/23/1993 1993 4 23 327 58 68 63 31 6927
4/24/1993 1993 4 24 328 47 63 55 23 6950
4/25/1993 1993 4 25 329 32 70 51 19 6969
4/26/1993 1993 4 26 330 42 72 57 25 6994
4/27/1993 1993 4 27 331 42 73 57.5 25.5 7019.5
4/28/1993 1993 4 28 332 48 75 61.5 29.5 7049
4/29/1993 1993 4 29 333 38 77 57.5 25.5 7074.5
4/30/1993 1993 4 30 334 55 70 62.5 30.5 7105
5/1/1993 1993 5 1 335 45 70 57.5 25.5 7130.5
5/2/1993 1993 5 2 336 48 76 62 30 7160.5
5/3/1993 1993 5 3 337 42 83 62.5 30.5 7191
5/4/1993 1993 5 4 338 43 65 54 22 7213
5/5/1993 1993 5 5 339 38 60 49 17 7230
5/6/1993 1993 5 6 340 40 63 51.5 19.5 7249.5
5/7/1993 1993 5 7 341 48 64 56 24 7273.5
5/8/1993 1993 5 8 342 39 58 48.5 16.5 7290
5/9/1993 1993 5 9 343 38 64 51 19 7309
5/10/1993 1993 5 10 344 52 77 64.5 32.5 7341.5
5/11/1993 1993 5 11 345 46 84 65 33 7374.5
5/12/1993 1993 5 12 346 38 88 63 31 7405.5
5/13/1993 1993 5 13 347 50 86 68 36 7441.5
5/14/1993 1993 5 14 348 69 82 75.5 43.5 7485
5/15/1993 1993 5 15 349 55 84 69.5 37.5 7522.5
5/16/1993 1993 5 16 350 55 82 68.5 36.5 7559
5/17/1993 1993 5 17 351 56 75 65.5 33.5 7592.5
5/18/1993 1993 5 18 352 60 82 71 39 7631.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
5/19/1993 1993 5 19 353 64 87 75.5 43.5 7675
5/20/1993 1993 5 20 354 55 84 69.5 37.5 7712.5
5/21/1993 1993 5 21 355 65 86 75.5 43.5 7756
5/22/1993 1993 5 22 356 65 82 73.5 41.5 7797.5
5/23/1993 1993 5 23 357 66 82 74 42 7839.5
5/24/1993 1993 5 24 358 51 89 70 38 7877.5
5/25/1993 1993 5 25 359 70 87 78.5 46.5 7924
5/26/1993 1993 5 26 360 70 85 77.5 45.5 7969.5
5/27/1993 1993 5 27 361 62 83 72.5 40.5 8010
5/28/1993 1993 5 28 362 60 83 71.5 39.5 8049.5
5/29/1993 1993 5 29 363 64 84 74 42 8091.5
5/30/1993 1993 5 30 364 52 88 70 38 8129.5
5/31/1993 1993 5 31 365 61 87 74 42 8171.5
6/1/1993 1993 6 1 1 73 84 78.5 46.5 46.5
6/2/1993 1993 6 2 2 62 83 72.5 40.5 87
6/3/1993 1993 6 3 3 50 71 60.5 28.5 115.5
6/4/1993 1993 6 4 4 45 77 61 29 144.5
6/5/1993 1993 6 5 5 68 80 74 42 186.5
6/6/1993 1993 6 6 6 52 67 59.5 27.5 214
6/7/1993 1993 6 7 7 65 73 69 37 251
6/8/1993 1993 6 8 8 52 75 63.5 31.5 282.5
6/9/1993 1993 6 9 9 47 78 62.5 30.5 313
6/10/1993 1993 6 10 10 45 89 67 35 348
6/11/1993 1993 6 11 11 55 90 72.5 40.5 388.5
6/12/1993 1993 6 12 12 72 91 81.5 49.5 438
6/13/1993 1993 6 13 13 52 90 71 39 477
6/14/1993 1993 6 14 14 65 99 82 50 527
6/15/1993 1993 6 15 15 72 100 86 54 581
6/16/1993 1993 6 16 16 76 93 84.5 52.5 633.5
6/17/1993 1993 6 17 17 53 72 62.5 30.5 664
6/18/1993 1993 6 18 18 57 82 69.5 37.5 701.5
6/19/1993 1993 6 19 19 52 85 68.5 36.5 738
6/20/1993 1993 6 20 20 50 93 71.5 39.5 777.5
6/21/1993 1993 6 21 21 58 94 76 44 821.5
6/22/1993 1993 6 22 22 62 92 77 45 866.5
6/23/1993 1993 6 23 23 58 86 72 40 906.5
6/24/1993 1993 6 24 24 46 84 65 33 939.5
6/25/1993 1993 6 25 25 48 90 69 37 976.5
6/26/1993 1993 6 26 26 52 99 75.5 43.5 1020
6/27/1993 1993 6 27 27 57 98 77.5 45.5 1065.5
6/28/1993 1993 6 28 28 65 101 83 51 1116.5
6/29/1993 1993 6 29 29 73 99 86 54 1170.5
6/30/1993 1993 6 30 30 57 93 75 43 1213.5
7/1/1993 1993 7 1 31 55 101 78 46 1259.5
7/2/1993 1993 7 2 32 59 96 77.5 45.5 1305
7/3/1993 1993 7 3 33 65 80 72.5 40.5 1345.5
7/4/1993 1993 7 4 34 50 77 63.5 31.5 1377
7/5/1993 1993 7 5 35 72 87 79.5 47.5 1424.5
7/6/1993 1993 7 6 36 52 92 72 40 1464.5
7/7/1993 1993 7 7 37 53 98 75.5 43.5 1508
7/8/1993 1993 7 8 38 62 94 78 46 1554
7/9/1993 1993 7 9 39 57 92 74.5 42.5 1596.5
7/10/1993 1993 7 10 40 57 102 79.5 47.5 1644
7/11/1993 1993 7 11 41 64 90 77 45 1689
7/12/1993 1993 7 12 42 60 96 78 46 1735
7/13/1993 1993 7 13 43 65 98 81.5 49.5 1784.5
7/14/1993 1993 7 14 44 76 97 86.5 54.5 1839
7/15/1993 1993 7 15 45 72 95 83.5 51.5 1890.5
7/16/1993 1993 7 16 46 64 92 78 46 1936.5
7/17/1993 1993 7 17 47 58 95 76.5 44.5 1981
7/18/1993 1993 7 18 48 75 93 84 52 2033
7/19/1993 1993 7 19 49 58 99 78.5 46.5 2079.5
7/20/1993 1993 7 20 50 67 92 79.5 47.5 2127
7/21/1993 1993 7 21 51 56 93 74.5 42.5 2169.5
7/22/1993 1993 7 22 52 55 92 73.5 41.5 2211
7/23/1993 1993 7 23 53 60 87 73.5 41.5 2252.5
7/24/1993 1993 7 24 54 57 83 70 38 2290.5
7/25/1993 1993 7 25 55 57 96 76.5 44.5 2335
7/26/1993 1993 7 26 56 71 96 83.5 51.5 2386.5
7/27/1993 1993 7 27 57 57 95 76 44 2430.5
7/28/1993 1993 7 28 58 70 100 85 53 2483.5
7/29/1993 1993 7 29 59 76 101 88.5 56.5 2540
7/30/1993 1993 7 30 60 63 95 79 47 2587
7/31/1993 1993 7 31 61 72 104 88 56 2643
8/1/1993 1993 8 1 62 65 102 83.5 51.5 2694.5
8/2/1993 1993 8 2 63 63 97 80 48 2742.5
8/3/1993 1993 8 3 64 63 95 79 47 2789.5
8/4/1993 1993 8 4 65 67 76 71.5 39.5 2829
8/5/1993 1993 8 5 66 66 93 79.5 47.5 2876.5
8/6/1993 1993 8 6 67 62 88 75 43 2919.5
8/7/1993 1993 8 7 68 70 95 82.5 50.5 2970
8/8/1993 1993 8 8 69 62 89 75.5 43.5 3013.5
8/9/1993 1993 8 9 70 66 90 78 46 3059.5
8/10/1993 1993 8 10 71 66 77 71.5 39.5 3099
8/11/1993 1993 8 11 72 62 92 77 45 3144
8/12/1993 1993 8 12 73 65 95 80 48 3192
8/13/1993 1993 8 13 74 67 92 79.5 47.5 3239.5
8/14/1993 1993 8 14 75 67 87 77 45 3284.5
8/15/1993 1993 8 15 76 68 95 81.5 49.5 3334
8/16/1993 1993 8 16 77 56 94 75 43 3377
8/17/1993 1993 8 17 78 62 92 77 45 3422
8/18/1993 1993 8 18 79 57 96 76.5 44.5 3466.5
8/19/1993 1993 8 19 80 67 90 78.5 46.5 3513
8/20/1993 1993 8 20 81 63 88 75.5 43.5 3556.5
8/21/1993 1993 8 21 82 61 93 77 45 3601.5
8/22/1993 1993 8 22 83 57 89 73 41 3642.5
8/23/1993 1993 8 23 84 55 93 74 42 3684.5
8/24/1993 1993 8 24 85 55 99 77 45 3729.5
8/25/1993 1993 8 25 86 64 81 72.5 40.5 3770
8/26/1993 1993 8 26 87 63 80 71.5 39.5 3809.5
8/27/1993 1993 8 27 88 60 84 72 40 3849.5
8/28/1993 1993 8 28 89 67 87 77 45 3894.5
8/29/1993 1993 8 29 90 63 85 74 42 3936.5
8/30/1993 1993 8 30 91 60 82 71 39 3975.5
8/31/1993 1993 8 31 92 60 82 71 39 4014.5
9/1/1993 1993 9 1 93 53 90 71.5 39.5 4054
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
9/2/1993 1993 9 2 94 55 88 71.5 39.5 4093.5
9/3/1993 1993 9 3 95 50 92 71 39 4132.5
9/4/1993 1993 9 4 96 52 90 71 39 4171.5
9/5/1993 1993 9 5 97 62 82 72 40 4211.5
9/6/1993 1993 9 6 98 57 84 70.5 38.5 4250
9/7/1993 1993 9 7 99 62 91 76.5 44.5 4294.5
9/8/1993 1993 9 8 100 57 85 71 39 4333.5
9/9/1993 1993 9 9 101 48 89 68.5 36.5 4370
9/10/1993 1993 9 10 102 50 93 71.5 39.5 4409.5
9/11/1993 1993 9 11 103 50 96 73 41 4450.5
9/12/1993 1993 9 12 104 52 86 69 37 4487.5
9/13/1993 1993 9 13 105 52 70 61 29 4516.5
9/14/1993 1993 9 14 106 43 75 59 27 4543.5
9/15/1993 1993 9 15 107 42 77 59.5 27.5 4571
9/16/1993 1993 9 16 108 50 85 67.5 35.5 4606.5
9/17/1993 1993 9 17 109 46 78 62 30 4636.5
9/18/1993 1993 9 18 110 55 65 60 28 4664.5
9/19/1993 1993 9 19 111 60 74 67 35 4699.5
9/20/1993 1993 9 20 112 42 80 61 29 4728.5
9/21/1993 1993 9 21 113 44 87 65.5 33.5 4762
9/22/1993 1993 9 22 114 46 85 65.5 33.5 4795.5
9/23/1993 1993 9 23 115 48 85 66.5 34.5 4830
9/24/1993 1993 9 24 116 47 77 62 30 4860
9/25/1993 1993 9 25 117 38 80 59 27 4887
9/26/1993 1993 9 26 118 50 77 63.5 31.5 4918.5
9/27/1993 1993 9 27 119 35 83 59 27 4945.5
9/28/1993 1993 9 28 120 43 85 64 32 4977.5
9/29/1993 1993 9 29 121 36 87 61.5 29.5 5007
9/30/1993 1993 9 30 122 42 87 64.5 32.5 5039.5
10/1/1993 1993 10 1 123 46 83 64.5 32.5 5072
10/2/1993 1993 10 2 124 44 80 62 30 5102
10/3/1993 1993 10 3 125 43 88 65.5 33.5 5135.5
10/4/1993 1993 10 4 126 44 69 56.5 24.5 5160
10/5/1993 1993 10 5 127 46 82 64 32 5192
10/6/1993 1993 10 6 128 53 62 57.5 25.5 5217.5
10/7/1993 1993 10 7 129 51 64 57.5 25.5 5243
10/8/1993 1993 10 8 130 38 56 47 15 5258
10/9/1993 1993 10 9 131 35 54 44.5 12.5 5270.5
10/10/1993 1993 10 10 132 41 62 51.5 19.5 5290
10/11/1993 1993 10 11 133 49 61 55 23 5313
10/12/1993 1993 10 12 134 45 66 55.5 23.5 5336.5
10/13/1993 1993 10 13 135 42 69 55.5 23.5 5360
10/14/1993 1993 10 14 136 50 75 62.5 30.5 5390.5
10/15/1993 1993 10 15 137 57 75 66 34 5424.5
10/16/1993 1993 10 16 138 43 63 53 21 5445.5
10/17/1993 1993 10 17 139 48 56 52 20 5465.5
10/18/1993 1993 10 18 140 42 56 49 17 5482.5
10/19/1993 1993 10 19 141 36 60 48 16 5498.5
10/20/1993 1993 10 20 142 34 61 47.5 15.5 5514
10/21/1993 1993 10 21 143 32 60 46 14 5528
10/22/1993 1993 10 22 144 35 63 49 17 5545
10/23/1993 1993 10 23 145 42 65 53.5 21.5 5566.5
10/24/1993 1993 10 24 146 34 69 51.5 19.5 5586
10/25/1993 1993 10 25 147 36 67 51.5 19.5 5605.5
10/26/1993 1993 10 26 148 37 60 48.5 16.5 5622
10/27/1993 1993 10 27 149 24 56 40 8 5630
10/28/1993 1993 10 28 150 29 57 43 11 5641
10/29/1993 1993 10 29 151 33 50 41.5 9.5 5650.5
10/30/1993 1993 10 30 152 20 50 35 3 5653.5
10/31/1993 1993 10 31 153 17 42 29.5 -2.5 5651
11/1/1993 1993 11 1 154 32 61 46.5 14.5 5665.5
11/2/1993 1993 11 2 155 25 56 40.5 8.5 5674
11/3/1993 1993 11 3 156 25 58 41.5 9.5 5683.5
11/4/1993 1993 11 4 157 19 59 39 7 5690.5
11/5/1993 1993 11 5 158 22 50 36 4 5694.5
11/6/1993 1993 11 6 159 16 48 32 0 5694.5
11/7/1993 1993 11 7 160 20 50 35 3 5697.5
11/8/1993 1993 11 8 161 16 56 36 4 5701.5
11/9/1993 1993 11 9 162 15 54 34.5 2.5 5704
11/10/1993 1993 11 10 163 22 46 34 2 5706
11/11/1993 1993 11 11 164 30 46 38 6 5712
11/12/1993 1993 11 12 165 29 44 36.5 4.5 5716.5
11/13/1993 1993 11 13 166 30 46 38 6 5722.5
11/14/1993 1993 11 14 167 30 40 35 3 5725.5
11/15/1993 1993 11 15 168 24 44 34 2 5727.5
11/16/1993 1993 11 16 169 30 48 39 7 5734.5
11/17/1993 1993 11 17 170 26 45 35.5 3.5 5738
11/18/1993 1993 11 18 171 29 46 37.5 5.5 5743.5
11/19/1993 1993 11 19 172 18 45 31.5 -0.5 5743
11/20/1993 1993 11 20 173 17 45 31 -1 5742
11/21/1993 1993 11 21 174 17 45 31 -1 5741
11/22/1993 1993 11 22 175 45 56 50.5 18.5 5759.5
11/23/1993 1993 11 23 176 32 58 45 13 5772.5
11/24/1993 1993 11 24 177 15 37 26 -6 5766.5
11/25/1993 1993 11 25 178 11 32 21.5 -10.5 5756
11/26/1993 1993 11 26 179 8 33 20.5 -11.5 5744.5
11/27/1993 1993 11 27 180 20 40 30 -2 5742.5
11/28/1993 1993 11 28 181 11 42 26.5 -5.5 5737
11/29/1993 1993 11 29 182 15 43 29 -3 5734
11/30/1993 1993 11 30 183 18 40 29 -3 5731
12/1/1993 1993 12 1 184 20 47 33.5 1.5 5732.5
12/2/1993 1993 12 2 185 22 50 36 4 5736.5
12/3/1993 1993 12 3 186 15 45 30 -2 5734.5
12/4/1993 1993 12 4 187 16 44 30 -2 5732.5
12/5/1993 1993 12 5 188 14 46 30 -2 5730.5
12/6/1993 1993 12 6 189 16 46 31 -1 5729.5
12/7/1993 1993 12 7 190 13 47 30 -2 5727.5
12/8/1993 1993 12 8 191 21 25 23 -9 5718.5
12/9/1993 1993 12 9 192 22 50 36 4 5722.5
12/10/1993 1993 12 10 193 18 48 33 1 5723.5
12/11/1993 1993 12 11 194 18 46 32 0 5723.5
12/12/1993 1993 12 12 195 27 43 35 3 5726.5
12/13/1993 1993 12 13 196 15 40 27.5 -4.5 5722
12/14/1993 1993 12 14 197 12 40 26 -6 5716
12/15/1993 1993 12 15 198 18 34 26 -6 5710
12/16/1993 1993 12 16 199 25 35 30 -2 5708
12/17/1993 1993 12 17 200 22 32 27 -5 5703
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
12/18/1993 1993 12 18 201 22 37 29.5 -2.5 5700.5
12/19/1993 1993 12 19 202 19 38 28.5 -3.5 5697
12/20/1993 1993 12 20 203 8 38 23 -9 5688
12/21/1993 1993 12 21 204 9 35 22 -10 5678
12/22/1993 1993 12 22 205 20 36 28 -4 5674
12/23/1993 1993 12 23 206 15 39 27 -5 5669
12/24/1993 1993 12 24 207 8 35 21.5 -10.5 5658.5
12/25/1993 1993 12 25 208 5 38 21.5 -10.5 5648
12/26/1993 1993 12 26 209 12 34 23 -9 5639
12/27/1993 1993 12 27 210 24 38 31 -1 5638
12/28/1993 1993 12 28 211 22 33 27.5 -4.5 5633.5
12/29/1993 1993 12 29 212 29 34 31.5 -0.5 5633
12/30/1993 1993 12 30 213 30 33 31.5 -0.5 5632.5
12/31/1993 1993 12 31 214 22 38 30 -2 5630.5
1/1/1994 1994 1 1 215 20 38 29 -3 5627.5
1/2/1994 1994 1 2 216 10 50 30 -2 5625.5
1/3/1994 1994 1 3 217 21 43 32 0 5625.5
1/4/1994 1994 1 4 218 19 43 31 -1 5624.5
1/5/1994 1994 1 5 219 37 51 44 12 5636.5
1/6/1994 1994 1 6 220 29 40 34.5 2.5 5639
1/7/1994 1994 1 7 221 10 40 25 -7 5632
1/8/1994 1994 1 8 222 13 35 24 -8 5624
1/9/1994 1994 1 9 223 12 44 28 -4 5620
1/10/1994 1994 1 10 224 12 45 28.5 -3.5 5616.5
1/11/1994 1994 1 11 225 10 40 25 -7 5609.5
1/12/1994 1994 1 12 226 11 43 27 -5 5604.5
1/13/1994 1994 1 13 227 10 46 28 -4 5600.5
1/14/1994 1994 1 14 228 10 29 19.5 -12.5 5588
1/15/1994 1994 1 15 229 10 10 10 -22 5566
1/16/1994 1994 1 16 230 25 48 36.5 4.5 5570.5
1/17/1994 1994 1 17 231 12 49 30.5 -1.5 5569
1/18/1994 1994 1 18 232 12 50 31 -1 5568
1/19/1994 1994 1 19 233 9 48 28.5 -3.5 5564.5
1/20/1994 1994 1 20 234 9 53 31 -1 5563.5
1/21/1994 1994 1 21 235 8 52 30 -2 5561.5
1/22/1994 1994 1 22 236 13 50 31.5 -0.5 5561
1/23/1994 1994 1 23 237 28 43 35.5 3.5 5564.5
1/24/1994 1994 1 24 238 20 51 35.5 3.5 5568
1/25/1994 1994 1 25 239 18 45 31.5 -0.5 5567.5
1/26/1994 1994 1 26 240 36 44 40 8 5575.5
1/27/1994 1994 1 27 241 32 42 37 5 5580.5
1/28/1994 1994 1 28 242 28 40 34 2 5582.5
1/29/1994 1994 1 29 243 18 45 31.5 -0.5 5582
1/30/1994 1994 1 30 244 25 35 30 -2 5580
1/31/1994 1994 1 31 245 8 30 19 -13 5567
2/1/1994 1994 2 1 246 8 35 21.5 -10.5 5556.5
2/2/1994 1994 2 2 247 7 35 21 -11 5545.5
2/3/1994 1994 2 3 248 12 41 26.5 -5.5 5540
2/4/1994 1994 2 4 249 24 31 27.5 -4.5 5535.5
2/5/1994 1994 2 5 250 27 35 31 -1 5534.5
2/6/1994 1994 2 6 251 30 39 34.5 2.5 5537
2/7/1994 1994 2 7 252 27 48 37.5 5.5 5542.5
2/8/1994 1994 2 8 253 34 52 43 11 5553.5
2/9/1994 1994 2 9 254 20 50 35 3 5556.5
2/10/1994 1994 2 10 255 18 56 37 5 5561.5
2/11/1994 1994 2 11 256 32 46 39 7 5568.5
2/12/1994 1994 2 12 257 18 39 28.5 -3.5 5565
2/13/1994 1994 2 13 258 8 44 26 -6 5559
2/14/1994 1994 2 14 259 15 47 31 -1 5558
2/15/1994 1994 2 15 260 12 48 30 -2 5556
2/16/1994 1994 2 16 261 22 48 35 3 5559
2/17/1994 1994 2 17 262 33 53 43 11 5570
2/18/1994 1994 2 18 263 39 52 45.5 13.5 5583.5
2/19/1994 1994 2 19 264 28 43 35.5 3.5 5587
2/20/1994 1994 2 20 265 15 43 29 -3 5584
2/21/1994 1994 2 21 266 26 45 35.5 3.5 5587.5
2/22/1994 1994 2 22 267 18 42 30 -2 5585.5
2/23/1994 1994 2 23 268 25 46 35.5 3.5 5589
2/24/1994 1994 2 24 269 13 50 31.5 -0.5 5588.5
2/25/1994 1994 2 25 270 24 63 43.5 11.5 5600
2/26/1994 1994 2 26 271 27 63 45 13 5613
2/27/1994 1994 2 27 272 40 58 49 17 5630
2/28/1994 1994 2 28 273 32 55 43.5 11.5 5641.5
3/1/1994 1994 3 1 274 24 63 43.5 11.5 5653
3/2/1994 1994 3 2 275 25 66 45.5 13.5 5666.5
3/3/1994 1994 3 3 276 24 64 44 12 5678.5
3/4/1994 1994 3 4 277 27 65 46 14 5692.5
3/5/1994 1994 3 5 278 52 70 61 29 5721.5
3/6/1994 1994 3 6 279 41 67 54 22 5743.5
3/7/1994 1994 3 7 280 31 66 48.5 16.5 5760
3/8/1994 1994 3 8 281 28 62 45 13 5773
3/9/1994 1994 3 9 282 26 57 41.5 9.5 5782.5
3/10/1994 1994 3 10 283 22 61 41.5 9.5 5792
3/11/1994 1994 3 11 284 36 63 49.5 17.5 5809.5
3/12/1994 1994 3 12 285 36 63 49.5 17.5 5827
3/13/1994 1994 3 13 286 22 67 44.5 12.5 5839.5
3/14/1994 1994 3 14 287 31 65 48 16 5855.5
3/15/1994 1994 3 15 288 28 73 50.5 18.5 5874
3/16/1994 1994 3 16 289 35 72 53.5 21.5 5895.5
3/17/1994 1994 3 17 290 43 72 57.5 25.5 5921
3/18/1994 1994 3 18 291 35 65 50 18 5939
3/19/1994 1994 3 19 292 50 64 57 25 5964
3/20/1994 1994 3 20 293 41 63 52 20 5984
3/21/1994 1994 3 21 294 25 70 47.5 15.5 5999.5
3/22/1994 1994 3 22 295 48 64 56 24 6023.5
3/23/1994 1994 3 23 296 32 49 40.5 8.5 6032
3/24/1994 1994 3 24 297 41 53 47 15 6047
3/25/1994 1994 3 25 298 39 60 49.5 17.5 6064.5
3/26/1994 1994 3 26 299 33 64 48.5 16.5 6081
3/27/1994 1994 3 27 300 36 50 43 11 6092
3/28/1994 1994 3 28 301 20 66 43 11 6103
3/29/1994 1994 3 29 302 36 65 50.5 18.5 6121.5
3/30/1994 1994 3 30 303 25 60 42.5 10.5 6132
3/31/1994 1994 3 31 304 25 60 42.5 10.5 6142.5
4/1/1994 1994 4 1 305 34 62 48 16 6158.5
4/2/1994 1994 4 2 306 38 67 52.5 20.5 6179
4/3/1994 1994 4 3 307 38 73 55.5 23.5 6202.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
4/4/1994 1994 4 4 308 40 57 48.5 16.5 6219
4/5/1994 1994 4 5 309 42 58 50 18 6237
4/6/1994 1994 4 6 310 38 67 52.5 20.5 6257.5
4/7/1994 1994 4 7 311 45 62 53.5 21.5 6279
4/8/1994 1994 4 8 312 47 60 53.5 21.5 6300.5
4/9/1994 1994 4 9 313 42 59 50.5 18.5 6319
4/10/1994 1994 4 10 314 38 48 43 11 6330
4/11/1994 1994 4 11 315 42 62 52 20 6350
4/12/1994 1994 4 12 316 39 67 53 21 6371
4/13/1994 1994 4 13 317 42 70 56 24 6395
4/14/1994 1994 4 14 318 55 75 65 33 6428
4/15/1994 1994 4 15 319 38 74 56 24 6452
4/16/1994 1994 4 16 320 38 80 59 27 6479
4/17/1994 1994 4 17 321 44 84 64 32 6511
4/18/1994 1994 4 18 322 49 82 65.5 33.5 6544.5
4/19/1994 1994 4 19 323 55 83 69 37 6581.5
4/20/1994 1994 4 20 324 52 84 68 36 6617.5
4/21/1994 1994 4 21 325 50 87 68.5 36.5 6654
4/22/1994 1994 4 22 326 60 84 72 40 6694
4/23/1994 1994 4 23 327 63 80 71.5 39.5 6733.5
4/24/1994 1994 4 24 328 47 65 56 24 6757.5
4/25/1994 1994 4 25 329 43 59 51 19 6776.5
4/26/1994 1994 4 26 330 38 55 46.5 14.5 6791
4/27/1994 1994 4 27 331 39 56 47.5 15.5 6806.5
4/28/1994 1994 4 28 332 34 57 45.5 13.5 6820
4/29/1994 1994 4 29 333 45 58 51.5 19.5 6839.5
4/30/1994 1994 4 30 334 34 63 48.5 16.5 6856
5/1/1994 1994 5 1 335 48 66 57 25 6881
5/2/1994 1994 5 2 336 40 71 55.5 23.5 6904.5
5/3/1994 1994 5 3 337 50 73 61.5 29.5 6934
5/4/1994 1994 5 4 338 46 83 64.5 32.5 6966.5
5/5/1994 1994 5 5 339 52 81 66.5 34.5 7001
5/6/1994 1994 5 6 340 48 86 67 35 7036
5/7/1994 1994 5 7 341 48 78 63 31 7067
5/8/1994 1994 5 8 342 44 76 60 28 7095
5/9/1994 1994 5 9 343 54 72 63 31 7126
5/10/1994 1994 5 10 344 44 77 60.5 28.5 7154.5
5/11/1994 1994 5 11 345 52 81 66.5 34.5 7189
5/12/1994 1994 5 12 346 52 80 66 34 7223
5/13/1994 1994 5 13 347 57 77 67 35 7258
5/14/1994 1994 5 14 348 52 82 67 35 7293
5/15/1994 1994 5 15 349 57 88 72.5 40.5 7333.5
5/16/1994 1994 5 16 350 72 83 77.5 45.5 7379
5/17/1994 1994 5 17 351 61 78 69.5 37.5 7416.5
5/18/1994 1994 5 18 352 64 80 72 40 7456.5
5/19/1994 1994 5 19 353 58 75 66.5 34.5 7491
5/20/1994 1994 5 20 354 42 76 59 27 7518
5/21/1994 1994 5 21 355 38 80 59 27 7545
5/22/1994 1994 5 22 356 40 87 63.5 31.5 7576.5
5/23/1994 1994 5 23 357 56 92 74 42 7618.5
5/24/1994 1994 5 24 358 48 87 67.5 35.5 7654
5/25/1994 1994 5 25 359 60 80 70 38 7692
5/26/1994 1994 5 26 360 52 83 67.5 35.5 7727.5
5/27/1994 1994 5 27 361 52 86 69 37 7764.5
5/28/1994 1994 5 28 362 60 84 72 40 7804.5
5/29/1994 1994 5 29 363 57 92 74.5 42.5 7847
5/30/1994 1994 5 30 364 51 96 73.5 41.5 7888.5
5/31/1994 1994 5 31 365 57 86 71.5 39.5 7928
6/1/1994 1994 6 1 1 68 86 77 45 45
6/2/1994 1994 6 2 2 55 94 74.5 42.5 87.5
6/3/1994 1994 6 3 3 55 88 71.5 39.5 127
6/4/1994 1994 6 4 4 78 92 85 53 180
6/5/1994 1994 6 5 5 55 97 76 44 224
6/6/1994 1994 6 6 6 73 85 79 47 271
6/7/1994 1994 6 7 7 62 85 73.5 41.5 312.5
6/8/1994 1994 6 8 8 48 87 67.5 35.5 348
6/9/1994 1994 6 9 9 48 91 69.5 37.5 385.5
6/10/1994 1994 6 10 10 63 94 78.5 46.5 432
6/11/1994 1994 6 11 11 65 99 82 50 482
6/12/1994 1994 6 12 12 58 101 79.5 47.5 529.5
6/13/1994 1994 6 13 13 65 96 80.5 48.5 578
6/14/1994 1994 6 14 14 78 96 87 55 633
6/15/1994 1994 6 15 15 76 92 84 52 685
6/16/1994 1994 6 16 16 72 93 82.5 50.5 735.5
6/17/1994 1994 6 17 17 70 96 83 51 786.5
6/18/1994 1994 6 18 18 69 93 81 49 835.5
6/19/1994 1994 6 19 19 72 86 79 47 882.5
6/20/1994 1994 6 20 20 63 93 78 46 928.5
6/21/1994 1994 6 21 21 62 90 76 44 972.5
6/22/1994 1994 6 22 22 60 95 77.5 45.5 1018
6/23/1994 1994 6 23 23 58 101 79.5 47.5 1065.5
6/24/1994 1994 6 24 24 70 103 86.5 54.5 1120
6/25/1994 1994 6 25 25 74 104 89 57 1177
6/26/1994 1994 6 26 26 61 108 84.5 52.5 1229.5
6/27/1994 1994 6 27 27 75 105 90 58 1287.5
6/28/1994 1994 6 28 28 62 98 80 48 1335.5
6/29/1994 1994 6 29 29 65 102 83.5 51.5 1387
6/30/1994 1994 6 30 30 69 105 87 55 1442
7/1/1994 1994 7 1 31 81 104 92.5 60.5 1502.5
7/2/1994 1994 7 2 32 77 94 85.5 53.5 1556
7/3/1994 1994 7 3 33 58 98 78 46 1602
7/4/1994 1994 7 4 34 60 100 80 48 1650
7/5/1994 1994 7 5 35 85 100 92.5 60.5 1710.5
7/6/1994 1994 7 6 36 71 90 80.5 48.5 1759
7/7/1994 1994 7 7 37 55 85 70 38 1797
7/8/1994 1994 7 8 38 55 97 76 44 1841
7/9/1994 1994 7 9 39 55 103 79 47 1888
7/10/1994 1994 7 10 40 80 97 88.5 56.5 1944.5
7/11/1994 1994 7 11 41 60 103 81.5 49.5 1994
7/12/1994 1994 7 12 42 60 97 78.5 46.5 2040.5
7/13/1994 1994 7 13 43 57 97 77 45 2085.5
7/14/1994 1994 7 14 44 78 97 87.5 55.5 2141
7/15/1994 1994 7 15 45 62 100 81 49 2190
7/16/1994 1994 7 16 46 70 105 87.5 55.5 2245.5
7/17/1994 1994 7 17 47 65 99 82 50 2295.5
7/18/1994 1994 7 18 48 73 92 82.5 50.5 2346
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
7/19/1994 1994 7 19 49 65 96 80.5 48.5 2394.5
7/20/1994 1994 7 20 50 67 99 83 51 2445.5
7/21/1994 1994 7 21 51 68 101 84.5 52.5 2498
7/22/1994 1994 7 22 52 72 92 82 50 2548
7/23/1994 1994 7 23 53 63 90 76.5 44.5 2592.5
7/24/1994 1994 7 24 54 78 100 89 57 2649.5
7/25/1994 1994 7 25 55 65 96 80.5 48.5 2698
7/26/1994 1994 7 26 56 65 101 83 51 2749
7/27/1994 1994 7 27 57 70 99 84.5 52.5 2801.5
7/28/1994 1994 7 28 58 69 102 85.5 53.5 2855
7/29/1994 1994 7 29 59 70 100 85 53 2908
7/30/1994 1994 7 30 60 76 104 90 58 2966
7/31/1994 1994 7 31 61 75 96 85.5 53.5 3019.5
8/1/1994 1994 8 1 62 76 95 85.5 53.5 3073
8/2/1994 1994 8 2 63 74 99 86.5 54.5 3127.5
8/3/1994 1994 8 3 64 92 97 94.5 62.5 3190
8/4/1994 1994 8 4 65 64 104 84 52 3242
8/5/1994 1994 8 5 66 74 103 88.5 56.5 3298.5
8/6/1994 1994 8 6 67 74 103 88.5 56.5 3355
8/7/1994 1994 8 7 68 75 99 87 55 3410
8/8/1994 1994 8 8 69 76 91 83.5 51.5 3461.5
8/9/1994 1994 8 9 70 76 95 85.5 53.5 3515
8/10/1994 1994 8 10 71 63 92 77.5 45.5 3560.5
8/11/1994 1994 8 11 72 65 95 80 48 3608.5
8/12/1994 1994 8 12 73 68 83 75.5 43.5 3652
8/13/1994 1994 8 13 74 69 95 82 50 3702
8/14/1994 1994 8 14 75 74 95 84.5 52.5 3754.5
8/15/1994 1994 8 15 76 68 96 82 50 3804.5
8/16/1994 1994 8 16 77 65 94 79.5 47.5 3852
8/17/1994 1994 8 17 78 63 98 80.5 48.5 3900.5
8/18/1994 1994 8 18 79 75 99 87 55 3955.5
8/19/1994 1994 8 19 80 68 87 77.5 45.5 4001
8/20/1994 1994 8 20 81 71 89 80 48 4049
8/21/1994 1994 8 21 82 65 89 77 45 4094
8/22/1994 1994 8 22 83 63 97 80 48 4142
8/23/1994 1994 8 23 84 55 96 75.5 43.5 4185.5
8/24/1994 1994 8 24 85 89 97 93 61 4246.5
8/25/1994 1994 8 25 86 68 100 84 52 4298.5
8/26/1994 1994 8 26 87 60 96 78 46 4344.5
8/27/1994 1994 8 27 88 76 90 83 51 4395.5
8/28/1994 1994 8 28 89 67 85 76 44 4439.5
8/29/1994 1994 8 29 90 67 93 80 48 4487.5
8/30/1994 1994 8 30 91 66 84 75 43 4530.5
8/31/1994 1994 8 31 92 75 88 81.5 49.5 4580
9/1/1994 1994 9 1 93 63 92 77.5 45.5 4625.5
9/2/1994 1994 9 2 94 60 93 76.5 44.5 4670
9/3/1994 1994 9 3 95 67 88 77.5 45.5 4715.5
9/4/1994 1994 9 4 96 58 92 75 43 4758.5
9/5/1994 1994 9 5 97 57 92 74.5 42.5 4801
9/6/1994 1994 9 6 98 53 82 67.5 35.5 4836.5
9/7/1994 1994 9 7 99 52 89 70.5 38.5 4875
9/8/1994 1994 9 8 100 53 93 73 41 4916
9/9/1994 1994 9 9 101 66 90 78 46 4962
9/10/1994 1994 9 10 102 64 90 77 45 5007
9/11/1994 1994 9 11 103 65 87 76 44 5051
9/12/1994 1994 9 12 104 68 88 78 46 5097
9/13/1994 1994 9 13 105 62 82 72 40 5137
9/14/1994 1994 9 14 106 58 75 66.5 34.5 5171.5
9/15/1994 1994 9 15 107 45 77 61 29 5200.5
9/16/1994 1994 9 16 108 44 77 60.5 28.5 5229
9/17/1994 1994 9 17 109 48 84 66 34 5263
9/18/1994 1994 9 18 110 60 84 72 40 5303
9/19/1994 1994 9 19 111 54 76 65 33 5336
9/20/1994 1994 9 20 112 56 75 65.5 33.5 5369.5
9/21/1994 1994 9 21 113 51 80 65.5 33.5 5403
9/22/1994 1994 9 22 114 56 77 66.5 34.5 5437.5
9/23/1994 1994 9 23 115 45 83 64 32 5469.5
9/24/1994 1994 9 24 116 46 88 67 35 5504.5
9/25/1994 1994 9 25 117 45 88 66.5 34.5 5539
9/26/1994 1994 9 26 118 48 87 67.5 35.5 5574.5
9/27/1994 1994 9 27 119 47 87 67 35 5609.5
9/28/1994 1994 9 28 120 45 91 68 36 5645.5
9/29/1994 1994 9 29 121 58 85 71.5 39.5 5685
9/30/1994 1994 9 30 122 52 67 59.5 27.5 5712.5
10/1/1994 1994 10 1 123 52 70 61 29 5741.5
10/2/1994 1994 10 2 124 45 73 59 27 5768.5
10/3/1994 1994 10 3 125 52 72 62 30 5798.5
10/4/1994 1994 10 4 126 45 71 58 26 5824.5
10/5/1994 1994 10 5 127 53 72 62.5 30.5 5855
10/6/1994 1994 10 6 128 46 64 55 23 5878
10/7/1994 1994 10 7 129 41 66 53.5 21.5 5899.5
10/8/1994 1994 10 8 130 56 69 62.5 30.5 5930
10/9/1994 1994 10 9 131 48 74 61 29 5959
10/10/1994 1994 10 10 132 38 73 55.5 23.5 5982.5
10/11/1994 1994 10 11 133 38 75 56.5 24.5 6007
10/12/1994 1994 10 12 134 42 74 58 26 6033
10/13/1994 1994 10 13 135 45 78 61.5 29.5 6062.5
10/14/1994 1994 10 14 136 52 68 60 28 6090.5
10/15/1994 1994 10 15 137 42 49 45.5 13.5 6104
10/16/1994 1994 10 16 138 41 46 43.5 11.5 6115.5
10/17/1994 1994 10 17 139 37 57 47 15 6130.5
10/18/1994 1994 10 18 140 40 57 48.5 16.5 6147
10/19/1994 1994 10 19 141 38 61 49.5 17.5 6164.5
10/20/1994 1994 10 20 142 37 62 49.5 17.5 6182
10/21/1994 1994 10 21 143 36 69 52.5 20.5 6202.5
10/22/1994 1994 10 22 144 33 69 51 19 6221.5
10/23/1994 1994 10 23 145 45 70 57.5 25.5 6247
10/24/1994 1994 10 24 146 36 58 47 15 6262
10/25/1994 1994 10 25 147 32 65 48.5 16.5 6278.5
10/26/1994 1994 10 26 148 32 70 51 19 6297.5
10/27/1994 1994 10 27 149 39 68 53.5 21.5 6319
10/28/1994 1994 10 28 150 34 70 52 20 6339
10/29/1994 1994 10 29 151 35 68 51.5 19.5 6358.5
10/30/1994 1994 10 30 152 35 62 48.5 16.5 6375
10/31/1994 1994 10 31 153 22 58 40 8 6383
11/1/1994 1994 11 1 154 25 65 45 13 6396
11/2/1994 1994 11 2 155 52 67 59.5 27.5 6423.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
11/3/1994 1994 11 3 156 32 40 36 4 6427.5
11/4/1994 1994 11 4 157 28 46 37 5 6432.5
11/5/1994 1994 11 5 158 32 55 43.5 11.5 6444
11/6/1994 1994 11 6 159 27 58 42.5 10.5 6454.5
11/7/1994 1994 11 7 160 30 64 47 15 6469.5
11/8/1994 1994 11 8 161 37 60 48.5 16.5 6486
11/9/1994 1994 11 9 162 27 60 43.5 11.5 6497.5
11/10/1994 1994 11 10 163 38 58 48 16 6513.5
11/11/1994 1994 11 11 164 48 63 55.5 23.5 6537
11/12/1994 1994 11 12 165 43 55 49 17 6554
11/13/1994 1994 11 13 166 27 43 35 3 6557
11/14/1994 1994 11 14 167 14 41 27.5 -4.5 6552.5
11/15/1994 1994 11 15 168 29 39 34 2 6554.5
11/16/1994 1994 11 16 169 41 41 41 9 6563.5
11/17/1994 1994 11 17 170 25 44 34.5 2.5 6566
11/18/1994 1994 11 18 171 30 40 35 3 6569
11/19/1994 1994 11 19 172 25 35 30 -2 6567
11/20/1994 1994 11 20 173 16 38 27 -5 6562
11/21/1994 1994 11 21 174 32 40 36 4 6566
11/22/1994 1994 11 22 175 22 38 30 -2 6564
11/23/1994 1994 11 23 176 15 39 27 -5 6559
11/24/1994 1994 11 24 177 25 39 32 0 6559
11/25/1994 1994 11 25 178 24 54 39 7 6566
11/26/1994 1994 11 26 179 31 45 38 6 6572
11/27/1994 1994 11 27 180 20 37 28.5 -3.5 6568.5
11/28/1994 1994 11 28 181 28 39 33.5 1.5 6570
11/29/1994 1994 11 29 182 12 38 25 -7 6563
11/30/1994 1994 11 30 183 12 38 25 -7 6556
12/1/1994 1994 12 1 184 12 44 28 -4 6552
12/2/1994 1994 12 2 185 13 40 26.5 -5.5 6546.5
12/3/1994 1994 12 3 186 14 40 27 -5 6541.5
12/4/1994 1994 12 4 187 27 45 36 4 6545.5
12/5/1994 1994 12 5 188 35 45 40 8 6553.5
12/6/1994 1994 12 6 189 34 49 41.5 9.5 6563
12/7/1994 1994 12 7 190 32 47 39.5 7.5 6570.5
12/8/1994 1994 12 8 191 22 37 29.5 -2.5 6568
12/9/1994 1994 12 9 192 14 36 25 -7 6561
12/10/1994 1994 12 10 193 10 32 21 -11 6550
12/11/1994 1994 12 11 194 10 39 24.5 -7.5 6542.5
12/12/1994 1994 12 12 195 18 35 26.5 -5.5 6537
12/13/1994 1994 12 13 196 22 38 30 -2 6535
12/14/1994 1994 12 14 197 18 44 31 -1 6534
12/15/1994 1994 12 15 198 22 45 33.5 1.5 6535.5
12/16/1994 1994 12 16 199 16 40 28 -4 6531.5
12/17/1994 1994 12 17 200 41 42 41.5 9.5 6541
12/18/1994 1994 12 18 201 13 44 28.5 -3.5 6537.5
12/19/1994 1994 12 19 202 25 25 25 -7 6530.5
12/20/1994 1994 12 20 203 14 36 25 -7 6523.5
12/21/1994 1994 12 21 204 12 44 28 -4 6519.5
12/22/1994 1994 12 22 205 15 38 26.5 -5.5 6514
12/23/1994 1994 12 23 206 27 37 32 0 6514
12/24/1994 1994 12 24 207 34 38 36 4 6518
12/25/1994 1994 12 25 208 34 42 38 6 6524
12/26/1994 1994 12 26 209 30 39 34.5 2.5 6526.5
12/27/1994 1994 12 27 210 31 36 33.5 1.5 6528
12/28/1994 1994 12 28 211 32 35 33.5 1.5 6529.5
12/29/1994 1994 12 29 212 34 39 36.5 4.5 6534
12/30/1994 1994 12 30 213 24 48 36 4 6538
12/31/1994 1994 12 31 214 17 40 28.5 -3.5 6534.5
1/1/1995 1995 1 1 215 13 35 24 -8 6526.5
1/2/1995 1995 1 2 216 22 33 27.5 -4.5 6522
1/3/1995 1995 1 3 217 10 34 22 -10 6512
1/4/1995 1995 1 4 218 30 33 31.5 -0.5 6511.5
1/5/1995 1995 1 5 219 27 35 31 -1 6510.5
1/6/1995 1995 1 6 220 23 43 33 1 6511.5
1/7/1995 1995 1 7 221 26 43 34.5 2.5 6514
1/8/1995 1995 1 8 222 34 38 36 4 6518
1/9/1995 1995 1 9 223 33 47 40 8 6526
1/10/1995 1995 1 10 224 39 46 42.5 10.5 6536.5
1/11/1995 1995 1 11 225 42 56 49 17 6553.5
1/12/1995 1995 1 12 226 26 46 36 4 6557.5
1/13/1995 1995 1 13 227 24 49 36.5 4.5 6562
1/14/1995 1995 1 14 228 30 42 36 4 6566
1/15/1995 1995 1 15 229 26 52 39 7 6573
1/16/1995 1995 1 16 230 29 44 36.5 4.5 6577.5
1/17/1995 1995 1 17 231 28 44 36 4 6581.5
1/18/1995 1995 1 18 232 13 29 21 -11 6570.5
1/19/1995 1995 1 19 233 15 42 28.5 -3.5 6567
1/20/1995 1995 1 20 234 16 42 29 -3 6564
1/21/1995 1995 1 21 235 22 36 29 -3 6561
1/22/1995 1995 1 22 236 19 40 29.5 -2.5 6558.5
1/23/1995 1995 1 23 237 15 39 27 -5 6553.5
1/24/1995 1995 1 24 238 28 34 31 -1 6552.5
1/25/1995 1995 1 25 239 32 38 35 3 6555.5
1/26/1995 1995 1 26 240 32 48 40 8 6563.5
1/27/1995 1995 1 27 241 30 48 39 7 6570.5
1/28/1995 1995 1 28 242 20 47 33.5 1.5 6572
1/29/1995 1995 1 29 243 17 46 31.5 -0.5 6571.5
1/30/1995 1995 1 30 244 17 44 30.5 -1.5 6570
1/31/1995 1995 1 31 245 20 46 33 1 6571
2/1/1995 1995 2 1 246 25 57 41 9 6580
2/2/1995 1995 2 2 247 25 53 39 7 6587
2/3/1995 1995 2 3 248 23 60 41.5 9.5 6596.5
2/4/1995 1995 2 4 249 20 58 39 7 6603.5
2/5/1995 1995 2 5 250 22 58 40 8 6611.5
2/6/1995 1995 2 6 251 20 62 41 9 6620.5
2/7/1995 1995 2 7 252 22 58 40 8 6628.5
2/8/1995 1995 2 8 253 28 50 39 7 6635.5
2/9/1995 1995 2 9 254 30 54 42 10 6645.5
2/10/1995 1995 2 10 255 24 45 34.5 2.5 6648
2/11/1995 1995 2 11 256 38 54 46 14 6662
2/12/1995 1995 2 12 257 49 60 54.5 22.5 6684.5
2/13/1995 1995 2 13 258 52 55 53.5 21.5 6706
2/14/1995 1995 2 14 259 32 54 43 11 6717
2/15/1995 1995 2 15 260 15 46 30.5 -1.5 6715.5
2/16/1995 1995 2 16 261 17 52 34.5 2.5 6718
2/17/1995 1995 2 17 262 22 56 39 7 6725
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
2/18/1995 1995 2 18 263 24 64 44 12 6737
2/19/1995 1995 2 19 264 23 58 40.5 8.5 6745.5
2/20/1995 1995 2 20 265 45 64 54.5 22.5 6768
2/21/1995 1995 2 21 266 28 67 47.5 15.5 6783.5
2/22/1995 1995 2 22 267 27 68 47.5 15.5 6799
2/23/1995 1995 2 23 268 24 68 46 14 6813
2/24/1995 1995 2 24 269 24 69 46.5 14.5 6827.5
2/25/1995 1995 2 25 270 32 63 47.5 15.5 6843
2/26/1995 1995 2 26 271 29 64 46.5 14.5 6857.5
2/27/1995 1995 2 27 272 27 67 47 15 6872.5
2/28/1995 1995 2 28 273 37 62 49.5 17.5 6890
3/1/1995 1995 3 1 274 37 50 43.5 11.5 6901.5
3/2/1995 1995 3 2 275 40 55 47.5 15.5 6917
3/3/1995 1995 3 3 276 35 56 45.5 13.5 6930.5
3/4/1995 1995 3 4 277 42 60 51 19 6949.5
3/5/1995 1995 3 5 278 48 60 54 22 6971.5
3/6/1995 1995 3 6 279 32 52 42 10 6981.5
3/7/1995 1995 3 7 280 24 52 38 6 6987.5
3/8/1995 1995 3 8 281 24 62 43 11 6998.5
3/9/1995 1995 3 9 282 30 68 49 17 7015.5
3/10/1995 1995 3 10 283 38 65 51.5 19.5 7035
3/11/1995 1995 3 11 284 47 60 53.5 21.5 7056.5
3/12/1995 1995 3 12 285 35 60 47.5 15.5 7072
3/13/1995 1995 3 13 286 30 65 47.5 15.5 7087.5
3/14/1995 1995 3 14 287 45 68 56.5 24.5 7112
3/15/1995 1995 3 15 288 52 63 57.5 25.5 7137.5
3/16/1995 1995 3 16 289 35 73 54 22 7159.5
3/17/1995 1995 3 17 290 46 67 56.5 24.5 7184
3/18/1995 1995 3 18 291 42 72 57 25 7209
3/19/1995 1995 3 19 292 47 64 55.5 23.5 7232.5
3/20/1995 1995 3 20 293 42 68 55 23 7255.5
3/21/1995 1995 3 21 294 55 72 63.5 31.5 7287
3/22/1995 1995 3 22 295 34 60 47 15 7302
3/23/1995 1995 3 23 296 33 67 50 18 7320
3/24/1995 1995 3 24 297 37 49 43 11 7331
3/25/1995 1995 3 25 298 36 44 40 8 7339
3/26/1995 1995 3 26 299 32 49 40.5 8.5 7347.5
3/27/1995 1995 3 27 300 29 57 43 11 7358.5
3/28/1995 1995 3 28 301 26 54 40 8 7366.5
3/29/1995 1995 3 29 302 32 45 38.5 6.5 7373
3/30/1995 1995 3 30 303 30 52 41 9 7382
3/31/1995 1995 3 31 304 27 61 44 12 7394
4/1/1995 1995 4 1 305 32 64 48 16 7410
4/2/1995 1995 4 2 306 42 64 53 21 7431
4/3/1995 1995 4 3 307 38 60 49 17 7448
4/4/1995 1995 4 4 308 37 75 56 24 7472
4/5/1995 1995 4 5 309 38 78 58 26 7498
4/6/1995 1995 4 6 310 37 72 54.5 22.5 7520.5
4/7/1995 1995 4 7 311 54 73 63.5 31.5 7552
4/8/1995 1995 4 8 312 58 77 67.5 35.5 7587.5
4/9/1995 1995 4 9 313 42 48 45 13 7600.5
4/10/1995 1995 4 10 314 35 55 45 13 7613.5
4/11/1995 1995 4 11 315 29 65 47 15 7628.5
4/12/1995 1995 4 12 316 35 70 52.5 20.5 7649
4/13/1995 1995 4 13 317 42 71 56.5 24.5 7673.5
4/14/1995 1995 4 14 318 47 62 54.5 22.5 7696
4/15/1995 1995 4 15 319 40 60 50 18 7714
4/16/1995 1995 4 16 320 30 62 46 14 7728
4/17/1995 1995 4 17 321 38 52 45 13 7741
4/18/1995 1995 4 18 322 36 52 44 12 7753
4/19/1995 1995 4 19 323 40 59 49.5 17.5 7770.5
4/20/1995 1995 4 20 324 35 53 44 12 7782.5
4/21/1995 1995 4 21 325 40 55 47.5 15.5 7798
4/22/1995 1995 4 22 326 41 61 51 19 7817
4/23/1995 1995 4 23 327 36 62 49 17 7834
4/24/1995 1995 4 24 328 42 66 54 22 7856
4/25/1995 1995 4 25 329 34 77 55.5 23.5 7879.5
4/26/1995 1995 4 26 330 40 67 53.5 21.5 7901
4/27/1995 1995 4 27 331 40 75 57.5 25.5 7926.5
4/28/1995 1995 4 28 332 52 74 63 31 7957.5
4/29/1995 1995 4 29 333 54 77 65.5 33.5 7991
4/30/1995 1995 4 30 334 58 65 61.5 29.5 8020.5
5/1/1995 1995 5 1 335 40 77 58.5 26.5 8047
5/2/1995 1995 5 2 336 52 64 58 26 8073
5/3/1995 1995 5 3 337 40 68 54 22 8095
5/4/1995 1995 5 4 338 43 74 58.5 26.5 8121.5
5/5/1995 1995 5 5 339 52 72 62 30 8151.5
5/6/1995 1995 5 6 340 48 65 56.5 24.5 8176
5/7/1995 1995 5 7 341 46 52 49 17 8193
5/8/1995 1995 5 8 342 33 71 52 20 8213
5/9/1995 1995 5 9 343 48 74 61 29 8242
5/10/1995 1995 5 10 344 54 76 65 33 8275
5/11/1995 1995 5 11 345 46 72 59 27 8302
5/12/1995 1995 5 12 346 46 57 51.5 19.5 8321.5
5/13/1995 1995 5 13 347 55 65 60 28 8349.5
5/14/1995 1995 5 14 348 53 75 64 32 8381.5
5/15/1995 1995 5 15 349 60 78 69 37 8418.5
5/16/1995 1995 5 16 350 60 76 68 36 8454.5
5/17/1995 1995 5 17 351 52 66 59 27 8481.5
5/18/1995 1995 5 18 352 57 74 65.5 33.5 8515
5/19/1995 1995 5 19 353 45 76 60.5 28.5 8543.5
5/20/1995 1995 5 20 354 67 83 75 43 8586.5
5/21/1995 1995 5 21 355 64 85 74.5 42.5 8629
5/22/1995 1995 5 22 356 63 74 68.5 36.5 8665.5
5/23/1995 1995 5 23 357 65 69 67 35 8700.5
5/24/1995 1995 5 24 358 52 66 59 27 8727.5
5/25/1995 1995 5 25 359 48 69 58.5 26.5 8754
5/26/1995 1995 5 26 360 50 65 57.5 25.5 8779.5
5/27/1995 1995 5 27 361 53 70 61.5 29.5 8809
5/28/1995 1995 5 28 362 47 70 58.5 26.5 8835.5
5/29/1995 1995 5 29 363 52 67 59.5 27.5 8863
5/30/1995 1995 5 30 364 66 77 71.5 39.5 8902.5
5/31/1995 1995 5 31 365 55 84 69.5 37.5 8940
6/1/1995 1995 6 1 1 52 88 70 38 38
6/2/1995 1995 6 2 2 50 83 66.5 34.5 72.5
6/3/1995 1995 6 3 3 63 74 68.5 36.5 109
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
6/4/1995 1995 6 4 4 59 80 69.5 37.5 146.5
6/5/1995 1995 6 5 5 60 92 76 44 190.5
6/6/1995 1995 6 6 6 52 70 61 29 219.5
6/7/1995 1995 6 7 7 48 74 61 29 248.5
6/8/1995 1995 6 8 8 52 63 57.5 25.5 274
6/9/1995 1995 6 9 9 48 74 61 29 303
6/10/1995 1995 6 10 10 53 79 66 34 337
6/11/1995 1995 6 11 11 67 92 79.5 47.5 384.5
6/12/1995 1995 6 12 12 64 97 80.5 48.5 433
6/13/1995 1995 6 13 13 70 98 84 52 485
6/14/1995 1995 6 14 14 57 100 78.5 46.5 531.5
6/15/1995 1995 6 15 15 74 89 81.5 49.5 581
6/16/1995 1995 6 16 16 57 84 70.5 38.5 619.5
6/17/1995 1995 6 17 17 55 64 59.5 27.5 647
6/18/1995 1995 6 18 18 40 82 61 29 676
6/19/1995 1995 6 19 19 45 87 66 34 710
6/20/1995 1995 6 20 20 78 94 86 54 764
6/21/1995 1995 6 21 21 60 87 73.5 41.5 805.5
6/22/1995 1995 6 22 22 58 86 72 40 845.5
6/23/1995 1995 6 23 23 72 85 78.5 46.5 892
6/24/1995 1995 6 24 24 55 88 71.5 39.5 931.5
6/25/1995 1995 6 25 25 55 90 72.5 40.5 972
6/26/1995 1995 6 26 26 55 95 75 43 1015
6/27/1995 1995 6 27 27 62 99 80.5 48.5 1063.5
6/28/1995 1995 6 28 28 67 88 77.5 45.5 1109
6/29/1995 1995 6 29 29 56 82 69 37 1146
6/30/1995 1995 6 30 30 62 78 70 38 1184
7/1/1995 1995 7 1 31 57 74 65.5 33.5 1217.5
7/2/1995 1995 7 2 32 62 89 75.5 43.5 1261
7/3/1995 1995 7 3 33 60 76 68 36 1297
7/4/1995 1995 7 4 34 48 83 65.5 33.5 1330.5
7/5/1995 1995 7 5 35 48 89 68.5 36.5 1367
7/6/1995 1995 7 6 36 54 98 76 44 1411
7/7/1995 1995 7 7 37 80 104 92 60 1471
7/8/1995 1995 7 8 38 60 102 81 49 1520
7/9/1995 1995 7 9 39 75 102 88.5 56.5 1576.5
7/10/1995 1995 7 10 40 62 98 80 48 1624.5
7/11/1995 1995 7 11 41 90 98 94 62 1686.5
7/12/1995 1995 7 12 42 67 94 80.5 48.5 1735
7/13/1995 1995 7 13 43 62 84 73 41 1776
7/14/1995 1995 7 14 44 62 83 72.5 40.5 1816.5
7/15/1995 1995 7 15 45 55 88 71.5 39.5 1856
7/16/1995 1995 7 16 46 58 99 78.5 46.5 1902.5
7/17/1995 1995 7 17 47 70 90 80 48 1950.5
7/18/1995 1995 7 18 48 61 88 74.5 42.5 1993
7/19/1995 1995 7 19 49 64 93 78.5 46.5 2039.5
7/20/1995 1995 7 20 50 62 92 77 45 2084.5
7/21/1995 1995 7 21 51 59 96 77.5 45.5 2130
7/22/1995 1995 7 22 52 54 96 75 43 2173
7/23/1995 1995 7 23 53 82 93 87.5 55.5 2228.5
7/24/1995 1995 7 24 54 68 99 83.5 51.5 2280
7/25/1995 1995 7 25 55 57 102 79.5 47.5 2327.5
7/26/1995 1995 7 26 56 56 107 81.5 49.5 2377
7/27/1995 1995 7 27 57 58 95 76.5 44.5 2421.5
7/28/1995 1995 7 28 58 67 103 85 53 2474.5
7/29/1995 1995 7 29 59 71 105 88 56 2530.5
7/30/1995 1995 7 30 60 75 100 87.5 55.5 2586
7/31/1995 1995 7 31 61 73 98 85.5 53.5 2639.5
8/1/1995 1995 8 1 62 54 97 75.5 43.5 2683
8/2/1995 1995 8 2 63 76 95 85.5 53.5 2736.5
8/3/1995 1995 8 3 64 65 95 80 48 2784.5
8/4/1995 1995 8 4 65 61 98 79.5 47.5 2832
8/5/1995 1995 8 5 66 66 105 85.5 53.5 2885.5
8/6/1995 1995 8 6 67 72 103 87.5 55.5 2941
8/7/1995 1995 8 7 68 87 104 95.5 63.5 3004.5
8/8/1995 1995 8 8 69 75 104 89.5 57.5 3062
8/9/1995 1995 8 9 70 71 96 83.5 51.5 3113.5
8/10/1995 1995 8 10 71 76 98 87 55 3168.5
8/11/1995 1995 8 11 72 69 88 78.5 46.5 3215
8/12/1995 1995 8 12 73 62 94 78 46 3261
8/13/1995 1995 8 13 74 65 94 79.5 47.5 3308.5
8/14/1995 1995 8 14 75 65 91 78 46 3354.5
8/15/1995 1995 8 15 76 75 95 85 53 3407.5
8/16/1995 1995 8 16 77 73 88 80.5 48.5 3456
8/17/1995 1995 8 17 78 60 90 75 43 3499
8/18/1995 1995 8 18 79 92 95 93.5 61.5 3560.5
8/19/1995 1995 8 19 80 78 88 83 51 3611.5
8/20/1995 1995 8 20 81 80 80 80 48 3659.5
8/21/1995 1995 8 21 82 72 86 79 47 3706.5
8/22/1995 1995 8 22 83 77 87 82 50 3756.5
8/23/1995 1995 8 23 84 62 85 73.5 41.5 3798
8/24/1995 1995 8 24 85 66 88 77 45 3843
8/25/1995 1995 8 25 86 66 90 78 46 3889
8/26/1995 1995 8 26 87 65 91 78 46 3935
8/27/1995 1995 8 27 88 70 93 81.5 49.5 3984.5
8/28/1995 1995 8 28 89 64 96 80 48 4032.5
8/29/1995 1995 8 29 90 58 100 79 47 4079.5
8/30/1995 1995 8 30 91 77 85 81 49 4128.5
8/31/1995 1995 8 31 92 62 96 79 47 4175.5
9/1/1995 1995 9 1 93 62 90 76 44 4219.5
9/2/1995 1995 9 2 94 65 96 80.5 48.5 4268
9/3/1995 1995 9 3 95 64 98 81 49 4317
9/4/1995 1995 9 4 96 62 97 79.5 47.5 4364.5
9/5/1995 1995 9 5 97 64 88 76 44 4408.5
9/6/1995 1995 9 6 98 65 86 75.5 43.5 4452
9/8/1995 1995 9 8 100 60 80 70 38 4490
9/9/1995 1995 9 9 101 64 83 73.5 41.5 4531.5
9/10/1995 1995 9 10 102 54 86 70 38 4569.5
9/11/1995 1995 9 11 103 53 88 70.5 38.5 4608
9/12/1995 1995 9 12 104 76 86 81 49 4657
9/13/1995 1995 9 13 105 48 86 67 35 4692
9/14/1995 1995 9 14 106 53 88 70.5 38.5 4730.5
9/15/1995 1995 9 15 107 55 75 65 33 4763.5
9/16/1995 1995 9 16 108 74 90 82 50 4813.5
9/17/1995 1995 9 17 109 55 86 70.5 38.5 4852
9/18/1995 1995 9 18 110 58 79 68.5 36.5 4888.5
9/19/1995 1995 9 19 111 65 75 70 38 4926.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
9/20/1995 1995 9 20 112 52 84 68 36 4962.5
9/21/1995 1995 9 21 113 57 70 63.5 31.5 4994
9/22/1995 1995 9 22 114 35 70 52.5 20.5 5014.5
9/23/1995 1995 9 23 115 58 78 68 36 5050.5
9/24/1995 1995 9 24 116 53 76 64.5 32.5 5083
9/25/1995 1995 9 25 117 59 72 65.5 33.5 5116.5
9/26/1995 1995 9 26 118 57 78 67.5 35.5 5152
9/27/1995 1995 9 27 119 46 81 63.5 31.5 5183.5
9/28/1995 1995 9 28 120 65 76 70.5 38.5 5222
9/29/1995 1995 9 29 121 62 68 65 33 5255
9/30/1995 1995 9 30 122 42 70 56 24 5279
10/1/1995 1995 10 1 123 40 73 56.5 24.5 5303.5
10/2/1995 1995 10 2 124 38 75 56.5 24.5 5328
10/3/1995 1995 10 3 125 41 79 60 28 5356
10/4/1995 1995 10 4 126 45 67 56 24 5380
10/5/1995 1995 10 5 127 32 63 47.5 15.5 5395.5
10/6/1995 1995 10 6 128 43 65 54 22 5417.5
10/7/1995 1995 10 7 129 29 73 51 19 5436.5
10/8/1995 1995 10 8 130 40 70 55 23 5459.5
10/9/1995 1995 10 9 131 42 78 60 28 5487.5
10/10/1995 1995 10 10 132 52 78 65 33 5520.5
10/11/1995 1995 10 11 133 71 83 77 45 5565.5
10/12/1995 1995 10 12 134 56 84 70 38 5603.5
10/13/1995 1995 10 13 135 37 63 50 18 5621.5
10/14/1995 1995 10 14 136 27 72 49.5 17.5 5639
10/15/1995 1995 10 15 137 32 73 52.5 20.5 5659.5
10/16/1995 1995 10 16 138 35 80 57.5 25.5 5685
10/17/1995 1995 10 17 139 37 78 57.5 25.5 5710.5
10/18/1995 1995 10 18 140 38 81 59.5 27.5 5738
10/19/1995 1995 10 19 141 42 70 56 24 5762
10/20/1995 1995 10 20 142 28 69 48.5 16.5 5778.5
10/21/1995 1995 10 21 143 62 70 66 34 5812.5
10/22/1995 1995 10 22 144 40 58 49 17 5829.5
10/23/1995 1995 10 23 145 22 48 35 3 5832.5
10/24/1995 1995 10 24 146 19 56 37.5 5.5 5838
10/25/1995 1995 10 25 147 20 60 40 8 5846
10/26/1995 1995 10 26 148 36 74 55 23 5869
10/27/1995 1995 10 27 149 35 72 53.5 21.5 5890.5
10/28/1995 1995 10 28 150 38 65 51.5 19.5 5910
10/29/1995 1995 10 29 151 41 67 54 22 5932
10/30/1995 1995 10 30 152 35 75 55 23 5955
10/31/1995 1995 10 31 153 37 70 53.5 21.5 5976.5
11/1/1995 1995 11 1 154 41 64 52.5 20.5 5997
11/2/1995 1995 11 2 155 29 54 41.5 9.5 6006.5
11/3/1995 1995 11 3 156 13 54 33.5 1.5 6008
11/4/1995 1995 11 4 157 18 48 33 1 6009
11/5/1995 1995 11 5 158 15 67 41 9 6018
11/6/1995 1995 11 6 159 35 65 50 18 6036
11/7/1995 1995 11 7 160 64 64 64 32 6068
11/8/1995 1995 11 8 161 42 42 42 10 6078
11/9/1995 1995 11 9 162 36 63 49.5 17.5 6095.5
11/10/1995 1995 11 10 163 32 62 47 15 6110.5
11/11/1995 1995 11 11 164 19 52 35.5 3.5 6114
11/12/1995 1995 11 12 165 22 58 40 8 6122
11/13/1995 1995 11 13 166 30 71 50.5 18.5 6140.5
11/14/1995 1995 11 14 167 30 66 48 16 6156.5
11/15/1995 1995 11 15 168 25 64 44.5 12.5 6169
11/16/1995 1995 11 16 169 25 65 45 13 6182
11/17/1995 1995 11 17 170 22 64 43 11 6193
11/18/1995 1995 11 18 171 23 58 40.5 8.5 6201.5
11/19/1995 1995 11 19 172 22 61 41.5 9.5 6211
11/20/1995 1995 11 20 173 22 61 41.5 9.5 6220.5
11/21/1995 1995 11 21 174 22 54 38 6 6226.5
11/22/1995 1995 11 22 175 23 58 40.5 8.5 6235
11/23/1995 1995 11 23 176 33 65 49 17 6252
11/24/1995 1995 11 24 177 20 56 38 6 6258
11/25/1995 1995 11 25 178 24 54 39 7 6265
11/26/1995 1995 11 26 179 29 56 42.5 10.5 6275.5
11/27/1995 1995 11 27 180 27 48 37.5 5.5 6281
11/28/1995 1995 11 28 181 17 48 32.5 0.5 6281.5
11/29/1995 1995 11 29 182 22 55 38.5 6.5 6288
11/30/1995 1995 11 30 183 18 54 36 4 6292
12/1/1995 1995 12 1 184 16 54 35 3 6295
12/2/1995 1995 12 2 185 17 57 37 5 6300
12/3/1995 1995 12 3 186 17 50 33.5 1.5 6301.5
12/4/1995 1995 12 4 187 25 61 43 11 6312.5
12/5/1995 1995 12 5 188 29 60 44.5 12.5 6325
12/6/1995 1995 12 6 189 36 56 46 14 6339
12/7/1995 1995 12 7 190 30 42 36 4 6343
12/8/1995 1995 12 8 191 26 54 40 8 6351
12/9/1995 1995 12 9 192 19 43 31 -1 6350
12/10/1995 1995 12 10 193 18 49 33.5 1.5 6351.5
12/11/1995 1995 12 11 194 32 46 39 7 6358.5
12/12/1995 1995 12 12 195 41 60 50.5 18.5 6377
12/13/1995 1995 12 13 196 42 53 47.5 15.5 6392.5
12/14/1995 1995 12 14 197 29 52 40.5 8.5 6401
12/15/1995 1995 12 15 198 22 42 32 0 6401
12/16/1995 1995 12 16 199 24 44 34 2 6403
12/17/1995 1995 12 17 200 24 48 36 4 6407
12/18/1995 1995 12 18 201 15 42 28.5 -3.5 6403.5
12/19/1995 1995 12 19 202 12 43 27.5 -4.5 6399
12/20/1995 1995 12 20 203 15 42 28.5 -3.5 6395.5
12/21/1995 1995 12 21 204 25 39 32 0 6395.5
12/22/1995 1995 12 22 205 7 36 21.5 -10.5 6385
12/23/1995 1995 12 23 206 3 36 19.5 -12.5 6372.5
12/24/1995 1995 12 24 207 3 34 18.5 -13.5 6359
12/25/1995 1995 12 25 208 14 37 25.5 -6.5 6352.5
12/26/1995 1995 12 26 209 1 41 21 -11 6341.5
12/27/1995 1995 12 27 210 2 39 20.5 -11.5 6330
12/28/1995 1995 12 28 211 12 33 22.5 -9.5 6320.5
12/29/1995 1995 12 29 212 6 38 22 -10 6310.5
12/30/1995 1995 12 30 213 27 44 35.5 3.5 6314
12/31/1995 1995 12 31 214 33 51 42 10 6324
1/1/1996 1996 1 1 215 16 45 30.5 -1.5 6322.5
1/2/1996 1996 1 2 216 16 35 25.5 -6.5 6316
1/3/1996 1996 1 3 217 15 37 26 -6 6310
1/4/1996 1996 1 4 218 10 47 28.5 -3.5 6306.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
1/5/1996 1996 1 5 219 12 43 27.5 -4.5 6302
1/6/1996 1996 1 6 220 10 44 27 -5 6297
1/7/1996 1996 1 7 221 13 43 28 -4 6293
1/8/1996 1996 1 8 222 5 44 24.5 -7.5 6285.5
1/9/1996 1996 1 9 223 11 45 28 -4 6281.5
1/10/1996 1996 1 10 224 28 57 42.5 10.5 6292
1/11/1996 1996 1 11 225 14 51 32.5 0.5 6292.5
1/12/1996 1996 1 12 226 12 43 27.5 -4.5 6288
1/13/1996 1996 1 13 227 13 52 32.5 0.5 6288.5
1/14/1996 1996 1 14 228 9 51 30 -2 6286.5
1/15/1996 1996 1 15 229 19 49 34 2 6288.5
1/16/1996 1996 1 16 230 18 54 36 4 6292.5
1/17/1996 1996 1 17 231 36 42 39 7 6299.5
1/18/1996 1996 1 18 232 13 35 24 -8 6291.5
1/19/1996 1996 1 19 233 24 44 34 2 6293.5
1/20/1996 1996 1 20 234 20 44 32 0 6293.5
1/21/1996 1996 1 21 235 25 48 36.5 4.5 6298
1/22/1996 1996 1 22 236 32 38 35 3 6301
1/23/1996 1996 1 23 237 12 21 16.5 -15.5 6285.5
1/24/1996 1996 1 24 238 7 46 26.5 -5.5 6280
1/25/1996 1996 1 25 239 33 45 39 7 6287
1/26/1996 1996 1 26 240 15 35 25 -7 6280
1/27/1996 1996 1 27 241 8 33 20.5 -11.5 6268.5
1/28/1996 1996 1 28 242 11 44 27.5 -4.5 6264
1/29/1996 1996 1 29 243 15 55 35 3 6267
1/30/1996 1996 1 30 244 44 54 49 17 6284
1/31/1996 1996 1 31 245 40 52 46 14 6298
2/1/1996 1996 2 1 246 40 48 44 12 6310
2/2/1996 1996 2 2 247 24 42 33 1 6311
2/3/1996 1996 2 3 248 28 39 33.5 1.5 6312.5
2/4/1996 1996 2 4 249 9 42 25.5 -6.5 6306
2/5/1996 1996 2 5 250 15 42 28.5 -3.5 6302.5
2/6/1996 1996 2 6 251 25 55 40 8 6310.5
2/7/1996 1996 2 7 252 25 52 38.5 6.5 6317
2/8/1996 1996 2 8 253 35 52 43.5 11.5 6328.5
2/9/1996 1996 2 9 254 38 58 48 16 6344.5
2/10/1996 1996 2 10 255 29 58 43.5 11.5 6356
2/11/1996 1996 2 11 256 22 55 38.5 6.5 6362.5
2/12/1996 1996 2 12 257 27 62 44.5 12.5 6375
2/13/1996 1996 2 13 258 18 63 40.5 8.5 6383.5
2/14/1996 1996 2 14 259 37 37 37 5 6388.5
2/15/1996 1996 2 15 260 22 70 46 14 6402.5
2/16/1996 1996 2 16 261 27 63 45 13 6415.5
2/17/1996 1996 2 17 262 24 68 46 14 6429.5
2/18/1996 1996 2 18 263 40 62 51 19 6448.5
2/19/1996 1996 2 19 264 33 65 49 17 6465.5
2/20/1996 1996 2 20 265 52 65 58.5 26.5 6492
2/21/1996 1996 2 21 266 50 58 54 22 6514
2/22/1996 1996 2 22 267 35 55 45 13 6527
2/23/1996 1996 2 23 268 18 46 32 0 6527
2/24/1996 1996 2 24 269 17 58 37.5 5.5 6532.5
2/25/1996 1996 2 25 270 40 49 44.5 12.5 6545
2/26/1996 1996 2 26 271 29 39 34 2 6547
2/27/1996 1996 2 27 272 10 35 22.5 -9.5 6537.5
2/28/1996 1996 2 28 273 18 41 29.5 -2.5 6535
2/29/1996 1996 2 29 274 35 48 41.5 9.5 6544.5
3/1/1996 1996 3 1 275 33 53 43 11 6555.5
3/2/1996 1996 3 2 276 33 57 45 13 6568.5
3/3/1996 1996 3 3 277 20 61 40.5 8.5 6577
3/4/1996 1996 3 4 278 42 61 51.5 19.5 6596.5
3/5/1996 1996 3 5 279 38 62 50 18 6614.5
3/6/1996 1996 3 6 280 33 53 43 11 6625.5
3/7/1996 1996 3 7 281 18 53 35.5 3.5 6629
3/8/1996 1996 3 8 282 22 65 43.5 11.5 6640.5
3/9/1996 1996 3 9 283 25 65 45 13 6653.5
3/10/1996 1996 3 10 284 35 62 48.5 16.5 6670
3/11/1996 1996 3 11 285 32 60 46 14 6684
3/12/1996 1996 3 12 286 34 65 49.5 17.5 6701.5
3/13/1996 1996 3 13 287 37 54 45.5 13.5 6715
3/14/1996 1996 3 14 288 26 56 41 9 6724
3/15/1996 1996 3 15 289 26 65 45.5 13.5 6737.5
3/16/1996 1996 3 16 290 50 66 58 26 6763.5
3/17/1996 1996 3 17 291 44 61 52.5 20.5 6784
3/18/1996 1996 3 18 292 28 55 41.5 9.5 6793.5
3/19/1996 1996 3 19 293 28 63 45.5 13.5 6807
3/20/1996 1996 3 20 294 44 69 56.5 24.5 6831.5
3/21/1996 1996 3 21 295 35 69 52 20 6851.5
3/22/1996 1996 3 22 296 40 78 59 27 6878.5
3/23/1996 1996 3 23 297 38 58 48 16 6894.5
3/24/1996 1996 3 24 298 40 52 46 14 6908.5
3/25/1996 1996 3 25 299 30 48 39 7 6915.5
3/26/1996 1996 3 26 300 34 57 45.5 13.5 6929
3/27/1996 1996 3 27 301 25 66 45.5 13.5 6942.5
3/28/1996 1996 3 28 302 32 67 49.5 17.5 6960
3/29/1996 1996 3 29 303 39 56 47.5 15.5 6975.5
3/30/1996 1996 3 30 304 44 62 53 21 6996.5
3/31/1996 1996 3 31 305 33 71 52 20 7016.5
4/1/1996 1996 4 1 306 35 75 55 23 7039.5
4/2/1996 1996 4 2 307 52 68 60 28 7067.5
4/3/1996 1996 4 3 308 54 64 59 27 7094.5
4/4/1996 1996 4 4 309 50 66 58 26 7120.5
4/5/1996 1996 4 5 310 34 62 48 16 7136.5
4/6/1996 1996 4 6 311 35 72 53.5 21.5 7158
4/7/1996 1996 4 7 312 41 77 59 27 7185
4/8/1996 1996 4 8 313 45 80 62.5 30.5 7215.5
4/9/1996 1996 4 9 314 53 87 70 38 7253.5
4/10/1996 1996 4 10 315 52 71 61.5 29.5 7283
4/11/1996 1996 4 11 316 48 66 57 25 7308
4/12/1996 1996 4 12 317 34 59 46.5 14.5 7322.5
4/13/1996 1996 4 13 318 40 58 49 17 7339.5
4/14/1996 1996 4 14 319 28 60 44 12 7351.5
4/15/1996 1996 4 15 320 52 68 60 28 7379.5
4/16/1996 1996 4 16 321 35 71 53 21 7400.5
4/17/1996 1996 4 17 322 49 64 56.5 24.5 7425
4/18/1996 1996 4 18 323 37 69 53 21 7446
4/19/1996 1996 4 19 324 35 64 49.5 17.5 7463.5
4/20/1996 1996 4 20 325 38 58 48 16 7479.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
4/21/1996 1996 4 21 326 39 62 50.5 18.5 7498
4/22/1996 1996 4 22 327 58 72 65 33 7531
4/23/1996 1996 4 23 328 68 82 75 43 7574
4/24/1996 1996 4 24 329 49 86 67.5 35.5 7609.5
4/25/1996 1996 4 25 330 60 70 65 33 7642.5
4/26/1996 1996 4 26 331 42 82 62 30 7672.5
4/27/1996 1996 4 27 332 53 79 66 34 7706.5
4/28/1996 1996 4 28 333 41 70 55.5 23.5 7730
4/29/1996 1996 4 29 334 27 69 48 16 7746
4/30/1996 1996 4 30 335 48 77 62.5 30.5 7776.5
5/1/1996 1996 5 1 336 45 82 63.5 31.5 7808
5/2/1996 1996 5 2 337 64 85 74.5 42.5 7850.5
5/3/1996 1996 5 3 338 56 83 69.5 37.5 7888
5/4/1996 1996 5 4 339 57 87 72 40 7928
5/5/1996 1996 5 5 340 58 89 73.5 41.5 7969.5
5/6/1996 1996 5 6 341 50 86 68 36 8005.5
5/7/1996 1996 5 7 342 50 88 69 37 8042.5
5/8/1996 1996 5 8 343 72 86 79 47 8089.5
5/9/1996 1996 5 9 344 76 77 76.5 44.5 8134
5/10/1996 1996 5 10 345 45 84 64.5 32.5 8166.5
5/11/1996 1996 5 11 346 58 93 75.5 43.5 8210
5/12/1996 1996 5 12 347 66 99 82.5 50.5 8260.5
5/13/1996 1996 5 13 348 80 94 87 55 8315.5
5/14/1996 1996 5 14 349 80 95 87.5 55.5 8371
5/15/1996 1996 5 15 350 73 94 83.5 51.5 8422.5
5/16/1996 1996 5 16 351 73 90 81.5 49.5 8472
5/17/1996 1996 5 17 352 60 90 75 43 8515
5/18/1996 1996 5 18 353 82 83 82.5 50.5 8565.5
5/19/1996 1996 5 19 354 58 84 71 39 8604.5
5/20/1996 1996 5 20 355 60 80 70 38 8642.5
5/21/1996 1996 5 21 356 60 86 73 41 8683.5
5/22/1996 1996 5 22 357 67 84 75.5 43.5 8727
5/23/1996 1996 5 23 358 52 65 58.5 26.5 8753.5
5/24/1996 1996 5 24 359 50 75 62.5 30.5 8784
5/25/1996 1996 5 25 360 42 52 47 15 8799
5/26/1996 1996 5 26 361 42 67 54.5 22.5 8821.5
5/27/1996 1996 5 27 362 48 76 62 30 8851.5
5/28/1996 1996 5 28 363 49 72 60.5 28.5 8880
5/29/1996 1996 5 29 364 72 85 78.5 46.5 8926.5
5/30/1996 1996 5 30 365 58 82 70 38 8964.5
5/31/1996 1996 5 31 366 48 83 65.5 33.5 8998
6/1/1996 1996 6 1 1 52 80 66 34 34
6/2/1996 1996 6 2 2 48 86 67 35 69
6/3/1996 1996 6 3 3 65 94 79.5 47.5 116.5
6/4/1996 1996 6 4 4 53 101 77 45 161.5
6/5/1996 1996 6 5 5 58 97 77.5 45.5 207
6/6/1996 1996 6 6 6 75 89 82 50 257
6/7/1996 1996 6 7 7 58 97 77.5 45.5 302.5
6/8/1996 1996 6 8 8 58 95 76.5 44.5 347
6/9/1996 1996 6 9 9 55 93 74 42 389
6/10/1996 1996 6 10 10 82 100 91 59 448
6/11/1996 1996 6 11 11 64 97 80.5 48.5 496.5
6/12/1996 1996 6 12 12 64 92 78 46 542.5
6/13/1996 1996 6 13 13 73 94 83.5 51.5 594
6/14/1996 1996 6 14 14 71 92 81.5 49.5 643.5
6/15/1996 1996 6 15 15 60 90 75 43 686.5
6/16/1996 1996 6 16 16 60 90 75 43 729.5
6/17/1996 1996 6 17 17 58 96 77 45 774.5
6/18/1996 1996 6 18 18 56 99 77.5 45.5 820
6/19/1996 1996 6 19 19 57 98 77.5 45.5 865.5
6/20/1996 1996 6 20 20 81 97 89 57 922.5
6/21/1996 1996 6 21 21 67 93 80 48 970.5
6/22/1996 1996 6 22 22 70 90 80 48 1018.5
6/23/1996 1996 6 23 23 82 94 88 56 1074.5
6/24/1996 1996 6 24 24 56 89 72.5 40.5 1115
6/25/1996 1996 6 25 25 74 95 84.5 52.5 1167.5
6/26/1996 1996 6 26 26 70 82 76 44 1211.5
6/27/1996 1996 6 27 27 67 86 76.5 44.5 1256
6/28/1996 1996 6 28 28 55 87 71 39 1295
6/29/1996 1996 6 29 29 52 92 72 40 1335
6/30/1996 1996 6 30 30 70 97 83.5 51.5 1386.5
7/1/1996 1996 7 1 31 75 75 75 43 1429.5
7/3/1996 1996 7 3 33 79 79 79 47 1476.5
7/8/1996 1996 7 8 38 77 77 77 45 1521.5
9/17/1996 1996 9 17 109 45 61 53 21 1542.5
9/18/1996 1996 9 18 110 46 61 53.5 21.5 1564
9/19/1996 1996 9 19 111 37 66 51.5 19.5 1583.5
9/20/1996 1996 9 20 112 45 57 51 19 1602.5
9/21/1996 1996 9 21 113 46 84 65 33 1635.5
9/22/1996 1996 9 22 114 50 88 69 37 1672.5
9/23/1996 1996 9 23 115 54 81 67.5 35.5 1708
9/24/1996 1996 9 24 116 52 88 70 38 1746
9/25/1996 1996 9 25 117 54 75 64.5 32.5 1778.5
9/26/1996 1996 9 26 118 48 64 56 24 1802.5
9/27/1996 1996 9 27 119 46 64 55 23 1825.5
9/28/1996 1996 9 28 120 37 70 53.5 21.5 1847
9/29/1996 1996 9 29 121 39 70 54.5 22.5 1869.5
9/30/1996 1996 9 30 122 43 66 54.5 22.5 1892
10/1/1996 1996 10 1 123 46 84 65 33 1925
10/2/1996 1996 10 2 124 54 61 57.5 25.5 1950.5
10/3/1996 1996 10 3 125 54 68 61 29 1979.5
10/4/1996 1996 10 4 126 46 72 59 27 2006.5
10/5/1996 1996 10 5 127 48 75 61.5 29.5 2036
10/6/1996 1996 10 6 128 45 84 64.5 32.5 2068.5
10/7/1996 1996 10 7 129 45 86 65.5 33.5 2102
10/8/1996 1996 10 8 130 45 86 65.5 33.5 2135.5
10/9/1996 1996 10 9 131 45 55 50 18 2153.5
10/10/1996 1996 10 10 132 45 75 60 28 2181.5
10/11/1996 1996 10 11 133 45 88 66.5 34.5 2216
10/12/1996 1996 10 12 134 48 84 66 34 2250
10/13/1996 1996 10 13 135 45 84 64.5 32.5 2282.5
10/14/1996 1996 10 14 136 59 77 68 36 2318.5
10/15/1996 1996 10 15 137 43 81 62 30 2348.5
10/16/1996 1996 10 16 138 45 64 54.5 22.5 2371
10/17/1996 1996 10 17 139 34 57 45.5 13.5 2384.5
10/18/1996 1996 10 18 140 28 63 45.5 13.5 2398
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
10/19/1996 1996 10 19 141 45 72 58.5 26.5 2424.5
10/21/1996 1996 10 21 143 25 50 37.5 5.5 2430
10/22/1996 1996 10 22 144 19 48 33.5 1.5 2431.5
10/23/1996 1996 10 23 145 32 59 45.5 13.5 2445
10/24/1996 1996 10 24 146 25 55 40 8 2453
10/25/1996 1996 10 25 147 34 45 39.5 7.5 2460.5
10/26/1996 1996 10 26 148 21 45 33 1 2461.5
10/27/1996 1996 10 27 149 36 50 43 11 2472.5
10/28/1996 1996 10 28 150 37 43 40 8 2480.5
10/29/1996 1996 10 29 151 34 52 43 11 2491.5
10/30/1996 1996 10 30 152 36 57 46.5 14.5 2506
10/31/1996 1996 10 31 153 36 48 42 10 2516
11/1/1996 1996 11 1 154 27 54 40.5 8.5 2524.5
11/2/1996 1996 11 2 155 27 54 40.5 8.5 2533
11/3/1996 1996 11 3 156 39 48 43.5 11.5 2544.5
11/4/1996 1996 11 4 157 36 55 45.5 13.5 2558
11/5/1996 1996 11 5 158 37 52 44.5 12.5 2570.5
11/6/1996 1996 11 6 159 30 48 39 7 2577.5
11/7/1996 1996 11 7 160 18 57 37.5 5.5 2583
11/8/1996 1996 11 8 161 25 54 39.5 7.5 2590.5
11/9/1996 1996 11 9 162 25 55 40 8 2598.5
11/10/1996 1996 11 10 163 21 61 41 9 2607.5
11/11/1996 1996 11 11 164 25 61 43 11 2618.5
11/12/1996 1996 11 12 165 21 37 29 -3 2615.5
11/13/1996 1996 11 13 166 37 52 44.5 12.5 2628
11/14/1996 1996 11 14 167 28 61 44.5 12.5 2640.5
11/15/1996 1996 11 15 168 34 39 36.5 4.5 2645
11/16/1996 1996 11 16 169 28 45 36.5 4.5 2649.5
11/17/1996 1996 11 17 170 32 45 38.5 6.5 2656
11/18/1996 1996 11 18 171 34 57 45.5 13.5 2669.5
11/19/1996 1996 11 19 172 32 55 43.5 11.5 2681
11/20/1996 1996 11 20 173 34 61 47.5 15.5 2696.5
11/21/1996 1996 11 21 174 32 57 44.5 12.5 2709
11/22/1996 1996 11 22 175 43 61 52 20 2729
11/23/1996 1996 11 23 176 32 55 43.5 11.5 2740.5
11/24/1996 1996 11 24 177 23 54 38.5 6.5 2747
11/25/1996 1996 11 25 178 25 54 39.5 7.5 2754.5
11/26/1996 1996 11 26 179 30 43 36.5 4.5 2759
11/27/1996 1996 11 27 180 18 43 30.5 -1.5 2757.5
11/28/1996 1996 11 28 181 10 43 26.5 -5.5 2752
11/29/1996 1996 11 29 182 34 39 36.5 4.5 2756.5
11/30/1996 1996 11 30 183 23 43 33 1 2757.5
12/1/1996 1996 12 1 184 16 43 29.5 -2.5 2755
12/2/1996 1996 12 2 185 25 43 34 2 2757
12/3/1996 1996 12 3 186 16 37 26.5 -5.5 2751.5
12/4/1996 1996 12 4 187 10 43 26.5 -5.5 2746
12/5/1996 1996 12 5 188 21 50 35.5 3.5 2749.5
12/6/1996 1996 12 6 189 30 48 39 7 2756.5
12/7/1996 1996 12 7 190 21 37 29 -3 2753.5
12/8/1996 1996 12 8 191 25 46 35.5 3.5 2757
12/9/1996 1996 12 9 192 23 36 29.5 -2.5 2754.5
12/10/1996 1996 12 10 193 43 57 50 18 2772.5
12/11/1996 1996 12 11 194 39 59 49 17 2789.5
12/12/1996 1996 12 12 195 28 59 43.5 11.5 2801
12/13/1996 1996 12 13 196 28 54 41 9 2810
12/14/1996 1996 12 14 197 27 43 35 3 2813
12/15/1996 1996 12 15 198 10 39 24.5 -7.5 2805.5
12/16/1996 1996 12 16 199 14 54 34 2 2807.5
12/17/1996 1996 12 17 200 7 27 17 -15 2792.5
12/18/1996 1996 12 18 201 0 34 17 -15 2777.5
12/19/1996 1996 12 19 202 7 36 21.5 -10.5 2767
12/20/1996 1996 12 20 203 9 36 22.5 -9.5 2757.5
12/21/1996 1996 12 21 204 27 48 37.5 5.5 2763
12/22/1996 1996 12 22 205 32 52 42 10 2773
12/23/1996 1996 12 23 206 23 39 31 -1 2772
12/24/1996 1996 12 24 207 12 37 24.5 -7.5 2764.5
12/25/1996 1996 12 25 208 16 41 28.5 -3.5 2761
12/26/1996 1996 12 26 209 18 39 28.5 -3.5 2757.5
12/27/1996 1996 12 27 210 34 54 44 12 2769.5
12/28/1996 1996 12 28 211 25 46 35.5 3.5 2773
12/29/1996 1996 12 29 212 28 39 33.5 1.5 2774.5
12/30/1996 1996 12 30 213 21 43 32 0 2774.5
12/31/1996 1996 12 31 214 39 57 48 16 2790.5
1/1/1997 1997 1 1 215 25 39 32 0 2790.5
1/2/1997 1997 1 2 216 27 45 36 4 2794.5
1/3/1997 1997 1 3 217 43 46 44.5 12.5 2807
1/4/1997 1997 1 4 218 27 43 35 3 2810
1/5/1997 1997 1 5 219 32 36 34 2 2812
1/6/1997 1997 1 6 220 18 36 27 -5 2807
1/7/1997 1997 1 7 221 9 34 21.5 -10.5 2796.5
1/8/1997 1997 1 8 222 9 45 27 -5 2791.5
1/9/1997 1997 1 9 223 18 48 33 1 2792.5
1/10/1997 1997 1 10 224 30 55 42.5 10.5 2803
1/11/1997 1997 1 11 225 34 50 42 10 2813
1/12/1997 1997 1 12 226 23 45 34 2 2815
1/13/1997 1997 1 13 227 21 27 24 -8 2807
1/14/1997 1997 1 14 228 -4 28 12 -20 2787
1/15/1997 1997 1 15 229 -8 16 4 -28 2759
1/16/1997 1997 1 16 230 -9 21 6 -26 2733
1/17/1997 1997 1 17 231 0 16 8 -24 2709
1/18/1997 1997 1 18 232 -9 14 2.5 -29.5 2679.5
1/19/1997 1997 1 19 233 -9 16 3.5 -28.5 2651
1/20/1997 1997 1 20 234 0 25 12.5 -19.5 2631.5
1/21/1997 1997 1 21 235 -2 19 8.5 -23.5 2608
1/22/1997 1997 1 22 236 5 23 14 -18 2590
1/23/1997 1997 1 23 237 30 45 37.5 5.5 2595.5
1/24/1997 1997 1 24 238 18 30 24 -8 2587.5
1/25/1997 1997 1 25 239 27 37 32 0 2587.5
1/26/1997 1997 1 26 240 36 50 43 11 2598.5
1/27/1997 1997 1 27 241 27 50 38.5 6.5 2605
1/28/1997 1997 1 28 242 12 39 25.5 -6.5 2598.5
1/29/1997 1997 1 29 243 27 48 37.5 5.5 2604
1/30/1997 1997 1 30 244 16 39 27.5 -4.5 2599.5
1/31/1997 1997 1 31 245 21 39 30 -2 2597.5
2/1/1997 1997 2 1 246 21 45 33 1 2598.5
2/2/1997 1997 2 2 247 28 45 36.5 4.5 2603
2/3/1997 1997 2 3 248 28 45 36.5 4.5 2607.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
2/4/1997 1997 2 4 249 25 45 35 3 2610.5
2/5/1997 1997 2 5 250 27 36 31.5 -0.5 2610
2/6/1997 1997 2 6 251 28 39 33.5 1.5 2611.5
2/7/1997 1997 2 7 252 19 41 30 -2 2609.5
2/8/1997 1997 2 8 253 18 39 28.5 -3.5 2606
2/9/1997 1997 2 9 254 18 45 31.5 -0.5 2605.5
2/10/1997 1997 2 10 255 25 39 32 0 2605.5
2/11/1997 1997 2 11 256 23 50 36.5 4.5 2610
2/12/1997 1997 2 12 257 25 39 32 0 2610
2/13/1997 1997 2 13 258 28 43 35.5 3.5 2613.5
2/14/1997 1997 2 14 259 19 48 33.5 1.5 2615
2/15/1997 1997 2 15 260 23 43 33 1 2616
2/16/1997 1997 2 16 261 25 48 36.5 4.5 2620.5
2/17/1997 1997 2 17 262 37 52 44.5 12.5 2633
2/18/1997 1997 2 18 263 28 54 41 9 2642
2/19/1997 1997 2 19 264 21 52 36.5 4.5 2646.5
2/20/1997 1997 2 20 265 32 48 40 8 2654.5
2/21/1997 1997 2 21 266 27 45 36 4 2658.5
2/22/1997 1997 2 22 267 18 43 30.5 -1.5 2657
2/23/1997 1997 2 23 268 32 43 37.5 5.5 2662.5
2/24/1997 1997 2 24 269 28 39 33.5 1.5 2664
2/25/1997 1997 2 25 270 28 52 40 8 2672
2/26/1997 1997 2 26 271 21 52 36.5 4.5 2676.5
2/27/1997 1997 2 27 272 37 43 40 8 2684.5
2/28/1997 1997 2 28 273 28 43 35.5 3.5 2688
3/1/1997 1997 3 1 274 18 45 31.5 -0.5 2687.5
3/2/1997 1997 3 2 275 27 48 37.5 5.5 2693
3/3/1997 1997 3 3 276 34 54 44 12 2705
3/4/1997 1997 3 4 277 30 43 36.5 4.5 2709.5
3/5/1997 1997 3 5 278 18 50 34 2 2711.5
3/6/1997 1997 3 6 279 19 54 36.5 4.5 2716
3/7/1997 1997 3 7 280 19 61 40 8 2724
3/8/1997 1997 3 8 281 28 68 48 16 2740
3/9/1997 1997 3 9 282 28 64 46 14 2754
3/10/1997 1997 3 10 283 28 57 42.5 10.5 2764.5
3/11/1997 1997 3 11 284 27 72 49.5 17.5 2782
3/12/1997 1997 3 12 285 36 75 55.5 23.5 2805.5
3/13/1997 1997 3 13 286 30 68 49 17 2822.5
3/14/1997 1997 3 14 287 30 66 48 16 2838.5
3/15/1997 1997 3 15 288 30 34 32 0 2838.5
3/16/1997 1997 3 16 289 57 70 63.5 31.5 2870
3/17/1997 1997 3 17 290 50 66 58 26 2896
3/18/1997 1997 3 18 291 32 68 50 18 2914
3/19/1997 1997 3 19 292 34 72 53 21 2935
3/20/1997 1997 3 20 293 32 81 56.5 24.5 2959.5
3/21/1997 1997 3 21 294 39 75 57 25 2984.5
3/22/1997 1997 3 22 295 37 79 58 26 3010.5
3/23/1997 1997 3 23 296 39 39 39 7 3017.5
3/24/1997 1997 3 24 297 43 61 52 20 3037.5
3/25/1997 1997 3 25 298 27 37 32 0 3037.5
3/26/1997 1997 3 26 299 27 66 46.5 14.5 3052
3/27/1997 1997 3 27 300 36 73 54.5 22.5 3074.5
3/29/1997 1997 3 29 302 36 59 47.5 15.5 3090
3/30/1997 1997 3 30 303 25 70 47.5 15.5 3105.5
3/31/1997 1997 3 31 304 41 72 56.5 24.5 3130
4/1/1997 1997 4 1 305 39 48 43.5 11.5 3141.5
4/2/1997 1997 4 2 306 34 37 35.5 3.5 3145
4/3/1997 1997 4 3 307 34 48 41 9 3154
4/4/1997 1997 4 4 308 39 59 49 17 3171
4/5/1997 1997 4 5 309 32 45 38.5 6.5 3177.5
4/6/1997 1997 4 6 310 37 52 44.5 12.5 3190
4/7/1997 1997 4 7 311 34 61 47.5 15.5 3205.5
4/8/1997 1997 4 8 312 36 55 45.5 13.5 3219
4/9/1997 1997 4 9 313 45 55 50 18 3237
4/10/1997 1997 4 10 314 32 46 39 7 3244
4/11/1997 1997 4 11 315 32 43 37.5 5.5 3249.5
4/12/1997 1997 4 12 316 30 45 37.5 5.5 3255
4/13/1997 1997 4 13 317 23 54 38.5 6.5 3261.5
4/14/1997 1997 4 14 318 34 66 50 18 3279.5
4/15/1997 1997 4 15 319 43 72 57.5 25.5 3305
4/16/1997 1997 4 16 320 37 73 55 23 3328
4/17/1997 1997 4 17 321 37 79 58 26 3354
4/18/1997 1997 4 18 322 43 82 62.5 30.5 3384.5
4/19/1997 1997 4 19 323 46 84 65 33 3417.5
4/20/1997 1997 4 20 324 55 81 68 36 3453.5
4/21/1997 1997 4 21 325 52 70 61 29 3482.5
4/22/1997 1997 4 22 326 45 72 58.5 26.5 3509
4/23/1997 1997 4 23 327 45 64 54.5 22.5 3531.5
4/24/1997 1997 4 24 328 39 57 48 16 3547.5
4/25/1997 1997 4 25 329 39 66 52.5 20.5 3568
4/26/1997 1997 4 26 330 48 70 59 27 3595
4/27/1997 1997 4 27 331 43 75 59 27 3622
4/28/1997 1997 4 28 332 54 77 65.5 33.5 3655.5
4/29/1997 1997 4 29 333 52 66 59 27 3682.5
4/30/1997 1997 4 30 334 37 68 52.5 20.5 3703
5/1/1997 1997 5 1 335 45 63 54 22 3725
5/2/1997 1997 5 2 336 37 64 50.5 18.5 3743.5
5/3/1997 1997 5 3 337 36 75 55.5 23.5 3767
5/4/1997 1997 5 4 338 55 82 68.5 36.5 3803.5
5/5/1997 1997 5 5 339 57 84 70.5 38.5 3842
5/6/1997 1997 5 6 340 46 88 67 35 3877
5/7/1997 1997 5 7 341 54 77 65.5 33.5 3910.5
5/8/1997 1997 5 8 342 46 84 65 33 3943.5
5/9/1997 1997 5 9 343 48 86 67 35 3978.5
5/10/1997 1997 5 10 344 46 84 65 33 4011.5
5/11/1997 1997 5 11 345 48 88 68 36 4047.5
5/12/1997 1997 5 12 346 48 84 66 34 4081.5
5/13/1997 1997 5 13 347 63 88 75.5 43.5 4125
5/14/1997 1997 5 14 348 55 91 73 41 4166
5/15/1997 1997 5 15 349 55 90 72.5 40.5 4206.5
5/16/1997 1997 5 16 350 64 91 77.5 45.5 4252
5/17/1997 1997 5 17 351 55 91 73 41 4293
5/18/1997 1997 5 18 352 55 84 69.5 37.5 4330.5
5/19/1997 1997 5 19 353 64 82 73 41 4371.5
5/20/1997 1997 5 20 354 61 79 70 38 4409.5
5/21/1997 1997 5 21 355 59 73 66 34 4443.5
5/22/1997 1997 5 22 356 52 81 66.5 34.5 4478
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
5/23/1997 1997 5 23 357 54 81 67.5 35.5 4513.5
5/24/1997 1997 5 24 358 57 72 64.5 32.5 4546
5/25/1997 1997 5 25 359 52 66 59 27 4573
5/26/1997 1997 5 26 360 36 72 54 22 4595
5/27/1997 1997 5 27 361 43 77 60 28 4623
5/28/1997 1997 5 28 362 61 86 73.5 41.5 4664.5
5/29/1997 1997 5 29 363 61 82 71.5 39.5 4704
5/30/1997 1997 5 30 364 59 91 75 43 4747
5/31/1997 1997 5 31 365 57 99 78 46 4793
6/1/1997 1997 6 1 1 63 99 81 49 49
6/2/1997 1997 6 2 2 64 88 76 44 93
6/3/1997 1997 6 3 3 70 91 80.5 48.5 141.5
6/4/1997 1997 6 4 4 68 93 80.5 48.5 190
6/5/1997 1997 6 5 5 70 93 81.5 49.5 239.5
6/6/1997 1997 6 6 6 63 81 72 40 279.5
6/7/1997 1997 6 7 7 63 81 72 40 319.5
6/8/1997 1997 6 8 8 64 81 72.5 40.5 360
6/9/1997 1997 6 9 9 63 81 72 40 400
6/10/1997 1997 6 10 10 63 77 70 38 438
6/11/1997 1997 6 11 11 55 90 72.5 40.5 478.5
6/12/1997 1997 6 12 12 70 84 77 45 523.5
6/13/1997 1997 6 13 13 66 81 73.5 41.5 565
6/14/1997 1997 6 14 14 64 81 72.5 40.5 605.5
6/15/1997 1997 6 15 15 57 82 69.5 37.5 643
6/16/1997 1997 6 16 16 57 88 72.5 40.5 683.5
6/17/1997 1997 6 17 17 72 84 78 46 729.5
6/18/1997 1997 6 18 18 63 95 79 47 776.5
6/19/1997 1997 6 19 19 84 100 92 60 836.5
6/20/1997 1997 6 20 20 63 102 82.5 50.5 887
6/21/1997 1997 6 21 21 63 99 81 49 936
6/22/1997 1997 6 22 22 72 97 84.5 52.5 988.5
6/23/1997 1997 6 23 23 72 95 83.5 51.5 1040
6/24/1997 1997 6 24 24 68 91 79.5 47.5 1087.5
6/25/1997 1997 6 25 25 55 93 74 42 1129.5
6/26/1997 1997 6 26 26 70 100 85 53 1182.5
6/27/1997 1997 6 27 27 64 93 78.5 46.5 1229
6/28/1997 1997 6 28 28 70 95 82.5 50.5 1279.5
6/29/1997 1997 6 29 29 52 93 72.5 40.5 1320
6/30/1997 1997 6 30 30 55 95 75 43 1363
7/1/1997 1997 7 1 31 64 88 76 44 1407
7/2/1997 1997 7 2 32 48 86 67 35 1442
7/3/1997 1997 7 3 33 55 88 71.5 39.5 1481.5
7/4/1997 1997 7 4 34 63 95 79 47 1528.5
7/5/1997 1997 7 5 35 68 104 86 54 1582.5
7/6/1997 1997 7 6 36 55 100 77.5 45.5 1628
7/7/1997 1997 7 7 37 79 102 90.5 58.5 1686.5
7/8/1997 1997 7 8 38 75 100 87.5 55.5 1742
7/9/1997 1997 7 9 39 61 97 79 47 1789
7/10/1997 1997 7 10 40 73 97 85 53 1842
7/11/1997 1997 7 11 41 68 91 79.5 47.5 1889.5
7/12/1997 1997 7 12 42 72 84 78 46 1935.5
7/13/1997 1997 7 13 43 57 90 73.5 41.5 1977
7/14/1997 1997 7 14 44 57 100 78.5 46.5 2023.5
7/15/1997 1997 7 15 45 70 97 83.5 51.5 2075
7/16/1997 1997 7 16 46 64 102 83 51 2126
7/17/1997 1997 7 17 47 70 102 86 54 2180
7/18/1997 1997 7 18 48 79 99 89 57 2237
7/19/1997 1997 7 19 49 75 84 79.5 47.5 2284.5
7/20/1997 1997 7 20 50 63 95 79 47 2331.5
7/21/1997 1997 7 21 51 63 97 80 48 2379.5
7/22/1997 1997 7 22 52 77 99 88 56 2435.5
7/23/1997 1997 7 23 53 68 93 80.5 48.5 2484
7/24/1997 1997 7 24 54 70 95 82.5 50.5 2534.5
7/25/1997 1997 7 25 55 61 100 80.5 48.5 2583
7/26/1997 1997 7 26 56 70 93 81.5 49.5 2632.5
7/27/1997 1997 7 27 57 73 97 85 53 2685.5
7/28/1997 1997 7 28 58 64 73 68.5 36.5 2722
7/29/1997 1997 7 29 59 66 88 77 45 2767
7/30/1997 1997 7 30 60 68 84 76 44 2811
7/31/1997 1997 7 31 61 70 84 77 45 2856
8/1/1997 1997 8 1 62 61 93 77 45 2901
8/2/1997 1997 8 2 63 64 95 79.5 47.5 2948.5
8/3/1997 1997 8 3 64 70 84 77 45 2993.5
8/4/1997 1997 8 4 65 66 73 69.5 37.5 3031
8/5/1997 1997 8 5 66 73 79 76 44 3075
8/6/1997 1997 8 6 67 73 90 81.5 49.5 3124.5
8/7/1997 1997 8 7 68 64 90 77 45 3169.5
8/8/1997 1997 8 8 69 63 95 79 47 3216.5
8/9/1997 1997 8 9 70 63 82 72.5 40.5 3257
8/10/1997 1997 8 10 71 63 84 73.5 41.5 3298.5
8/11/1997 1997 8 11 72 70 84 77 45 3343.5
8/12/1997 1997 8 12 73 63 82 72.5 40.5 3384
8/13/1997 1997 8 13 74 57 81 69 37 3421
8/14/1997 1997 8 14 75 63 77 70 38 3459
8/15/1997 1997 8 15 76 57 97 77 45 3504
8/16/1997 1997 8 16 77 77 97 87 55 3559
8/17/1997 1997 8 17 78 61 91 76 44 3603
8/18/1997 1997 8 18 79 61 93 77 45 3648
8/19/1997 1997 8 19 80 61 91 76 44 3692
8/20/1997 1997 8 20 81 68 97 82.5 50.5 3742.5
8/21/1997 1997 8 21 82 61 95 78 46 3788.5
8/22/1997 1997 8 22 83 63 91 77 45 3833.5
8/23/1997 1997 8 23 84 68 97 82.5 50.5 3884
8/24/1997 1997 8 24 85 70 95 82.5 50.5 3934.5
8/25/1997 1997 8 25 86 63 95 79 47 3981.5
8/26/1997 1997 8 26 87 66 81 73.5 41.5 4023
8/27/1997 1997 8 27 88 64 88 76 44 4067
8/28/1997 1997 8 28 89 64 90 77 45 4112
8/29/1997 1997 8 29 90 66 90 78 46 4158
8/30/1997 1997 8 30 91 66 93 79.5 47.5 4205.5
8/31/1997 1997 8 31 92 64 75 69.5 37.5 4243
9/1/1997 1997 9 1 93 64 81 72.5 40.5 4283.5
9/2/1997 1997 9 2 94 66 79 72.5 40.5 4324
9/3/1997 1997 9 3 95 61 75 68 36 4360
9/4/1997 1997 9 4 96 63 79 71 39 4399
9/5/1997 1997 9 5 97 63 82 72.5 40.5 4439.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
9/6/1997 1997 9 6 98 64 81 72.5 40.5 4480
9/7/1997 1997 9 7 99 63 82 72.5 40.5 4520.5
9/8/1997 1997 9 8 100 61 88 74.5 42.5 4563
9/9/1997 1997 9 9 101 64 88 76 44 4607
9/10/1997 1997 9 10 102 64 90 77 45 4652
9/11/1997 1997 9 11 103 61 81 71 39 4691
9/12/1997 1997 9 12 104 61 88 74.5 42.5 4733.5
9/13/1997 1997 9 13 105 61 79 70 38 4771.5
9/14/1997 1997 9 14 106 61 82 71.5 39.5 4811
9/15/1997 1997 9 15 107 64 75 69.5 37.5 4848.5
9/16/1997 1997 9 16 108 61 82 71.5 39.5 4888
9/17/1997 1997 9 17 109 61 81 71 39 4927
9/18/1997 1997 9 18 110 66 84 75 43 4970
9/19/1997 1997 9 19 111 57 82 69.5 37.5 5007.5
9/20/1997 1997 9 20 112 59 70 64.5 32.5 5040
9/21/1997 1997 9 21 113 59 73 66 34 5074
9/22/1997 1997 9 22 114 52 72 62 30 5104
9/23/1997 1997 9 23 115 55 73 64 32 5136
9/24/1997 1997 9 24 116 48 57 52.5 20.5 5156.5
9/25/1997 1997 9 25 117 52 72 62 30 5186.5
9/26/1997 1997 9 26 118 61 73 67 35 5221.5
9/27/1997 1997 9 27 119 52 81 66.5 34.5 5256
9/28/1997 1997 9 28 120 54 79 66.5 34.5 5290.5
9/29/1997 1997 9 29 121 43 82 62.5 30.5 5321
9/30/1997 1997 9 30 122 48 84 66 34 5355
10/1/1997 1997 10 1 123 46 88 67 35 5390
10/2/1997 1997 10 2 124 59 82 70.5 38.5 5428.5
10/3/1997 1997 10 3 125 52 75 63.5 31.5 5460
10/4/1997 1997 10 4 126 50 82 66 34 5494
10/5/1997 1997 10 5 127 50 81 65.5 33.5 5527.5
10/6/1997 1997 10 6 128 50 84 67 35 5562.5
10/7/1997 1997 10 7 129 54 68 61 29 5591.5
10/8/1997 1997 10 8 130 48 63 55.5 23.5 5615
10/9/1997 1997 10 9 131 37 72 54.5 22.5 5637.5
10/10/1997 1997 10 10 132 43 82 62.5 30.5 5668
10/11/1997 1997 10 11 133 45 63 54 22 5690
10/12/1997 1997 10 12 134 39 52 45.5 13.5 5703.5
10/13/1997 1997 10 13 135 28 61 44.5 12.5 5716
10/14/1997 1997 10 14 136 30 66 48 16 5732
10/15/1997 1997 10 15 137 30 72 51 19 5751
10/16/1997 1997 10 16 138 34 73 53.5 21.5 5772.5
10/17/1997 1997 10 17 139 34 72 53 21 5793.5
10/18/1997 1997 10 18 140 45 75 60 28 5821.5
10/19/1997 1997 10 19 141 36 75 55.5 23.5 5845
10/20/1997 1997 10 20 142 36 73 54.5 22.5 5867.5
10/21/1997 1997 10 21 143 36 73 54.5 22.5 5890
10/22/1997 1997 10 22 144 34 72 53 21 5911
10/23/1997 1997 10 23 145 34 59 46.5 14.5 5925.5
10/24/1997 1997 10 24 146 37 48 42.5 10.5 5936
10/25/1997 1997 10 25 147 28 46 37 5 5941
10/26/1997 1997 10 26 148 19 54 36.5 4.5 5945.5
10/27/1997 1997 10 27 149 19 37 28 -4 5941.5
10/28/1997 1997 10 28 150 23 59 41 9 5950.5
10/29/1997 1997 10 29 151 30 63 46.5 14.5 5965
10/30/1997 1997 10 30 152 32 48 40 8 5973
10/31/1997 1997 10 31 153 48 72 60 28 6001
11/1/1997 1997 11 1 154 37 64 50.5 18.5 6019.5
11/2/1997 1997 11 2 155 34 61 47.5 15.5 6035
11/3/1997 1997 11 3 156 27 59 43 11 6046
11/4/1997 1997 11 4 157 27 61 44 12 6058
11/5/1997 1997 11 5 158 28 54 41 9 6067
11/6/1997 1997 11 6 159 27 64 45.5 13.5 6080.5
11/7/1997 1997 11 7 160 25 64 44.5 12.5 6093
11/8/1997 1997 11 8 161 36 63 49.5 17.5 6110.5
11/9/1997 1997 11 9 162 36 54 45 13 6123.5
11/10/1997 1997 11 10 163 36 46 41 9 6132.5
11/11/1997 1997 11 11 164 39 48 43.5 11.5 6144
11/12/1997 1997 11 12 165 36 48 42 10 6154
11/13/1997 1997 11 13 166 27 55 41 9 6163
11/14/1997 1997 11 14 167 27 43 35 3 6166
11/15/1997 1997 11 15 168 16 39 27.5 -4.5 6161.5
11/16/1997 1997 11 16 169 25 43 34 2 6163.5
11/17/1997 1997 11 17 170 -2 46 22 -10 6153.5
11/18/1997 1997 11 18 171 16 46 31 -1 6152.5
11/19/1997 1997 11 19 172 25 54 39.5 7.5 6160
11/20/1997 1997 11 20 173 25 54 39.5 7.5 6167.5
11/21/1997 1997 11 21 174 25 46 35.5 3.5 6171
11/22/1997 1997 11 22 175 18 48 33 1 6172
11/23/1997 1997 11 23 176 21 48 34.5 2.5 6174.5
11/24/1997 1997 11 24 177 16 48 32 0 6174.5
11/25/1997 1997 11 25 178 28 57 42.5 10.5 6185
11/26/1997 1997 11 26 179 36 50 43 11 6196
11/27/1997 1997 11 27 180 41 52 46.5 14.5 6210.5
11/28/1997 1997 11 28 181 23 52 37.5 5.5 6216
11/29/1997 1997 11 29 182 18 50 34 2 6218
11/30/1997 1997 11 30 183 34 48 41 9 6227
12/1/1997 1997 12 1 184 34 48 41 9 6236
12/2/1997 1997 12 2 185 32 48 40 8 6244
12/3/1997 1997 12 3 186 19 43 31 -1 6243
12/4/1997 1997 12 4 187 10 43 26.5 -5.5 6237.5
12/5/1997 1997 12 5 188 14 39 26.5 -5.5 6232
12/6/1997 1997 12 6 189 18 43 30.5 -1.5 6230.5
12/7/1997 1997 12 7 190 28 45 36.5 4.5 6235
12/8/1997 1997 12 8 191 32 43 37.5 5.5 6240.5
12/9/1997 1997 12 9 192 25 37 31 -1 6239.5
12/10/1997 1997 12 10 193 34 43 38.5 6.5 6246
12/11/1997 1997 12 11 194 12 39 25.5 -6.5 6239.5
12/12/1997 1997 12 12 195 5 43 24 -8 6231.5
12/13/1997 1997 12 13 196 5 43 24 -8 6223.5
12/14/1997 1997 12 14 197 9 39 24 -8 6215.5
12/15/1997 1997 12 15 198 25 41 33 1 6216.5
12/16/1997 1997 12 16 199 21 48 34.5 2.5 6219
12/17/1997 1997 12 17 200 12 28 20 -12 6207
12/18/1997 1997 12 18 201 18 39 28.5 -3.5 6203.5
12/19/1997 1997 12 19 202 19 45 32 0 6203.5
12/20/1997 1997 12 20 203 9 43 26 -6 6197.5
12/21/1997 1997 12 21 204 19 37 28 -4 6193.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
12/22/1997 1997 12 22 205 25 43 34 2 6195.5
12/23/1997 1997 12 23 206 9 43 26 -6 6189.5
12/24/1997 1997 12 24 207 27 34 30.5 -1.5 6188
12/25/1997 1997 12 25 208 16 36 26 -6 6182
12/26/1997 1997 12 26 209 5 39 22 -10 6172
12/27/1997 1997 12 27 210 5 43 24 -8 6164
12/28/1997 1997 12 28 211 9 43 26 -6 6158
12/29/1997 1997 12 29 212 12 37 24.5 -7.5 6150.5
12/30/1997 1997 12 30 213 14 46 30 -2 6148.5
12/31/1997 1997 12 31 214 14 28 21 -11 6137.5
1/1/1998 1998 1 1 215 27 46 36.5 4.5 6142
1/2/1998 1998 1 2 216 19 43 31 -1 6141
1/3/1998 1998 1 3 217 23 48 35.5 3.5 6144.5
1/4/1998 1998 1 4 218 21 54 37.5 5.5 6150
1/5/1998 1998 1 5 219 34 43 38.5 6.5 6156.5
1/6/1998 1998 1 6 220 14 45 29.5 -2.5 6154
1/7/1998 1998 1 7 221 10 25 17.5 -14.5 6139.5
1/8/1998 1998 1 8 222 7 34 20.5 -11.5 6128
1/9/1998 1998 1 9 223 10 39 24.5 -7.5 6120.5
1/10/1998 1998 1 10 224 25 48 36.5 4.5 6125
1/11/1998 1998 1 11 225 19 52 35.5 3.5 6128.5
1/12/1998 1998 1 12 226 30 54 42 10 6138.5
1/13/1998 1998 1 13 227 34 48 41 9 6147.5
1/14/1998 1998 1 14 228 19 37 28 -4 6143.5
1/15/1998 1998 1 15 229 27 45 36 4 6147.5
1/16/1998 1998 1 16 230 18 46 32 0 6147.5
1/17/1998 1998 1 17 231 25 48 36.5 4.5 6152
1/18/1998 1998 1 18 232 23 52 37.5 5.5 6157.5
1/19/1998 1998 1 19 233 21 39 30 -2 6155.5
1/20/1998 1998 1 20 234 18 45 31.5 -0.5 6155
1/21/1998 1998 1 21 235 12 43 27.5 -4.5 6150.5
1/22/1998 1998 1 22 236 9 34 21.5 -10.5 6140
1/23/1998 1998 1 23 237 25 45 35 3 6143
1/24/1998 1998 1 24 238 23 52 37.5 5.5 6148.5
1/25/1998 1998 1 25 239 25 55 40 8 6156.5
1/26/1998 1998 1 26 240 18 52 35 3 6159.5
1/27/1998 1998 1 27 241 23 54 38.5 6.5 6166
1/28/1998 1998 1 28 242 12 55 33.5 1.5 6167.5
1/29/1998 1998 1 29 243 16 43 29.5 -2.5 6165
1/30/1998 1998 1 30 244 25 48 36.5 4.5 6169.5
1/31/1998 1998 1 31 245 18 54 36 4 6173.5
2/1/1998 1998 2 1 246 37 55 46 14 6187.5
2/2/1998 1998 2 2 247 34 48 41 9 6196.5
2/3/1998 1998 2 3 248 34 48 41 9 6205.5
2/4/1998 1998 2 4 249 30 50 40 8 6213.5
2/5/1998 1998 2 5 250 27 57 42 10 6223.5
2/6/1998 1998 2 6 251 18 46 32 0 6223.5
2/7/1998 1998 2 7 252 37 54 45.5 13.5 6237
2/8/1998 1998 2 8 253 28 46 37 5 6242
2/9/1998 1998 2 9 254 25 46 35.5 3.5 6245.5
2/10/1998 1998 2 10 255 18 46 32 0 6245.5
2/11/1998 1998 2 11 256 21 48 34.5 2.5 6248
2/12/1998 1998 2 12 257 14 46 30 -2 6246
2/13/1998 1998 2 13 258 27 43 35 3 6249
2/14/1998 1998 2 14 259 36 43 39.5 7.5 6256.5
2/15/1998 1998 2 15 260 37 43 40 8 6264.5
2/16/1998 1998 2 16 261 30 46 38 6 6270.5
2/17/1998 1998 2 17 262 30 43 36.5 4.5 6275
2/18/1998 1998 2 18 263 19 46 32.5 0.5 6275.5
2/19/1998 1998 2 19 264 16 46 31 -1 6274.5
2/20/1998 1998 2 20 265 30 46 38 6 6280.5
2/21/1998 1998 2 21 266 21 52 36.5 4.5 6285
2/22/1998 1998 2 22 267 36 57 46.5 14.5 6299.5
2/23/1998 1998 2 23 268 30 55 42.5 10.5 6310
2/24/1998 1998 2 24 269 37 57 47 15 6325
2/25/1998 1998 2 25 270 30 39 34.5 2.5 6327.5
2/26/1998 1998 2 26 271 12 43 27.5 -4.5 6323
2/27/1998 1998 2 27 272 18 41 29.5 -2.5 6320.5
2/28/1998 1998 2 28 273 10 43 26.5 -5.5 6315
3/1/1998 1998 3 1 274 16 54 35 3 6318
3/2/1998 1998 3 2 275 25 54 39.5 7.5 6325.5
3/3/1998 1998 3 3 276 19 64 41.5 9.5 6335
3/4/1998 1998 3 4 277 25 50 37.5 5.5 6340.5
3/5/1998 1998 3 5 278 25 54 39.5 7.5 6348
3/6/1998 1998 3 6 279 39 54 46.5 14.5 6362.5
3/7/1998 1998 3 7 280 28 45 36.5 4.5 6367
3/8/1998 1998 3 8 281 16 45 30.5 -1.5 6365.5
3/9/1998 1998 3 9 282 18 55 36.5 4.5 6370
3/10/1998 1998 3 10 283 18 50 34 2 6372
3/11/1998 1998 3 11 284 21 57 39 7 6379
3/12/1998 1998 3 12 285 21 63 42 10 6389
3/13/1998 1998 3 13 286 27 63 45 13 6402
3/14/1998 1998 3 14 287 37 66 51.5 19.5 6421.5
3/15/1998 1998 3 15 288 32 70 51 19 6440.5
3/16/1998 1998 3 16 289 32 64 48 16 6456.5
3/17/1998 1998 3 17 290 37 63 50 18 6474.5
3/18/1998 1998 3 18 291 37 50 43.5 11.5 6486
3/19/1998 1998 3 19 292 25 57 41 9 6495
3/20/1998 1998 3 20 293 27 61 44 12 6507
3/21/1998 1998 3 21 294 27 66 46.5 14.5 6521.5
3/22/1998 1998 3 22 295 36 75 55.5 23.5 6545
3/23/1998 1998 3 23 296 46 81 63.5 31.5 6576.5
3/24/1998 1998 3 24 297 63 82 72.5 40.5 6617
3/25/1998 1998 3 25 298 55 77 66 34 6651
3/26/1998 1998 3 26 299 50 63 56.5 24.5 6675.5
3/27/1998 1998 3 27 300 39 57 48 16 6691.5
3/28/1998 1998 3 28 301 37 48 42.5 10.5 6702
3/29/1998 1998 3 29 302 36 45 40.5 8.5 6710.5
3/30/1998 1998 3 30 303 28 48 38 6 6716.5
3/31/1998 1998 3 31 304 23 61 42 10 6726.5
4/1/1998 1998 4 1 305 34 55 44.5 12.5 6739
4/2/1998 1998 4 2 306 37 59 48 16 6755
4/3/1998 1998 4 3 307 28 59 43.5 11.5 6766.5
4/4/1998 1998 4 4 308 39 59 49 17 6783.5
4/5/1998 1998 4 5 309 32 63 47.5 15.5 6799
4/6/1998 1998 4 6 310 39 54 46.5 14.5 6813.5
4/7/1998 1998 4 7 311 43 50 46.5 14.5 6828
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
4/8/1998 1998 4 8 312 39 59 49 17 6845
4/9/1998 1998 4 9 313 34 66 50 18 6863
4/10/1998 1998 4 10 314 36 75 55.5 23.5 6886.5
4/11/1998 1998 4 11 315 43 77 60 28 6914.5
4/12/1998 1998 4 12 316 39 57 48 16 6930.5
4/13/1998 1998 4 13 317 39 55 47 15 6945.5
4/14/1998 1998 4 14 318 46 57 51.5 19.5 6965
4/15/1998 1998 4 15 319 36 55 45.5 13.5 6978.5
4/16/1998 1998 4 16 320 32 46 39 7 6985.5
4/17/1998 1998 4 17 321 36 55 45.5 13.5 6999
4/18/1998 1998 4 18 322 43 61 52 20 7019
4/19/1998 1998 4 19 323 34 64 49 17 7036
4/20/1998 1998 4 20 324 37 70 53.5 21.5 7057.5
4/21/1998 1998 4 21 325 34 61 47.5 15.5 7073
4/22/1998 1998 4 22 326 57 81 69 37 7110
4/23/1998 1998 4 23 327 43 84 63.5 31.5 7141.5
4/24/1998 1998 4 24 328 57 75 66 34 7175.5
4/25/1998 1998 4 25 329 50 64 57 25 7200.5
4/26/1998 1998 4 26 330 43 64 53.5 21.5 7222
4/27/1998 1998 4 27 331 45 70 57.5 25.5 7247.5
4/28/1998 1998 4 28 332 45 66 55.5 23.5 7271
4/29/1998 1998 4 29 333 57 75 66 34 7305
4/30/1998 1998 4 30 334 46 81 63.5 31.5 7336.5
5/1/1998 1998 5 1 335 48 81 64.5 32.5 7369
5/2/1998 1998 5 2 336 59 84 71.5 39.5 7408.5
5/3/1998 1998 5 3 337 52 81 66.5 34.5 7443
5/4/1998 1998 5 4 338 57 75 66 34 7477
5/5/1998 1998 5 5 339 45 68 56.5 24.5 7501.5
5/6/1998 1998 5 6 340 46 61 53.5 21.5 7523
5/7/1998 1998 5 7 341 50 73 61.5 29.5 7552.5
5/8/1998 1998 5 8 342 45 73 59 27 7579.5
5/9/1998 1998 5 9 343 46 75 60.5 28.5 7608
5/10/1998 1998 5 10 344 52 77 64.5 32.5 7640.5
5/11/1998 1998 5 11 345 46 79 62.5 30.5 7671
5/12/1998 1998 5 12 346 63 75 69 37 7708
5/13/1998 1998 5 13 347 52 61 56.5 24.5 7732.5
5/14/1998 1998 5 14 348 48 64 56 24 7756.5
5/15/1998 1998 5 15 349 37 72 54.5 22.5 7779
5/16/1998 1998 5 16 350 39 72 55.5 23.5 7802.5
5/17/1998 1998 5 17 351 61 84 72.5 40.5 7843
5/18/1998 1998 5 18 352 55 82 68.5 36.5 7879.5
5/19/1998 1998 5 19 353 55 88 71.5 39.5 7919
5/20/1998 1998 5 20 354 59 82 70.5 38.5 7957.5
5/21/1998 1998 5 21 355 52 75 63.5 31.5 7989
5/22/1998 1998 5 22 356 43 70 56.5 24.5 8013.5
5/23/1998 1998 5 23 357 37 75 56 24 8037.5
5/24/1998 1998 5 24 358 64 81 72.5 40.5 8078
5/25/1998 1998 5 25 359 50 84 67 35 8113
5/26/1998 1998 5 26 360 70 82 76 44 8157
5/27/1998 1998 5 27 361 64 82 73 41 8198
5/28/1998 1998 5 28 362 54 88 71 39 8237
5/29/1998 1998 5 29 363 73 81 77 45 8282
5/30/1998 1998 5 30 364 68 86 77 45 8327
5/31/1998 1998 5 31 365 66 90 78 46 8373
6/1/1998 1998 6 1 1 55 90 72.5 40.5 40.5
6/2/1998 1998 6 2 2 55 91 73 41 81.5
6/3/1998 1998 6 3 3 73 84 78.5 46.5 128
6/4/1998 1998 6 4 4 55 72 63.5 31.5 159.5
6/5/1998 1998 6 5 5 45 77 61 29 188.5
6/6/1998 1998 6 6 6 52 84 68 36 224.5
6/7/1998 1998 6 7 7 55 73 64 32 256.5
6/8/1998 1998 6 8 8 55 64 59.5 27.5 284
6/9/1998 1998 6 9 9 57 72 64.5 32.5 316.5
6/10/1998 1998 6 10 10 46 75 60.5 28.5 345
6/11/1998 1998 6 11 11 46 75 60.5 28.5 373.5
6/12/1998 1998 6 12 12 70 82 76 44 417.5
6/13/1998 1998 6 13 13 63 75 69 37 454.5
6/14/1998 1998 6 14 14 55 81 68 36 490.5
6/15/1998 1998 6 15 15 48 84 66 34 524.5
6/16/1998 1998 6 16 16 46 90 68 36 560.5
6/17/1998 1998 6 17 17 55 70 62.5 30.5 591
6/18/1998 1998 6 18 18 45 82 63.5 31.5 622.5
6/19/1998 1998 6 19 19 52 93 72.5 40.5 663
6/20/1998 1998 6 20 20 63 88 75.5 43.5 706.5
6/21/1998 1998 6 21 21 55 95 75 43 749.5
6/22/1998 1998 6 22 22 55 90 72.5 40.5 790
6/23/1998 1998 6 23 23 61 84 72.5 40.5 830.5
6/24/1998 1998 6 24 24 81 93 87 55 885.5
6/25/1998 1998 6 25 25 54 93 73.5 41.5 927
6/26/1998 1998 6 26 26 75 97 86 54 981
6/27/1998 1998 6 27 27 77 99 88 56 1037
6/28/1998 1998 6 28 28 72 102 87 55 1092
6/29/1998 1998 6 29 29 64 106 85 53 1145
6/30/1998 1998 6 30 30 77 104 90.5 58.5 1203.5
7/1/1998 1998 7 1 31 61 106 83.5 51.5 1255
7/2/1998 1998 7 2 32 61 100 80.5 48.5 1303.5
7/3/1998 1998 7 3 33 61 102 81.5 49.5 1353
7/4/1998 1998 7 4 34 91 102 96.5 64.5 1417.5
7/5/1998 1998 7 5 35 64 97 80.5 48.5 1466
7/6/1998 1998 7 6 36 72 95 83.5 51.5 1517.5
7/7/1998 1998 7 7 37 70 99 84.5 52.5 1570
7/8/1998 1998 7 8 38 64 90 77 45 1615
7/9/1998 1998 7 9 39 72 99 85.5 53.5 1668.5
7/10/1998 1998 7 10 40 70 95 82.5 50.5 1719
7/11/1998 1998 7 11 41 64 97 80.5 48.5 1767.5
7/12/1998 1998 7 12 42 57 102 79.5 47.5 1815
7/13/1998 1998 7 13 43 66 104 85 53 1868
7/14/1998 1998 7 14 44 63 106 84.5 52.5 1920.5
7/15/1998 1998 7 15 45 61 106 83.5 51.5 1972
7/16/1998 1998 7 16 46 63 108 85.5 53.5 2025.5
7/17/1998 1998 7 17 47 82 106 94 62 2087.5
7/18/1998 1998 7 18 48 64 108 86 54 2141.5
7/19/1998 1998 7 19 49 73 108 90.5 58.5 2200
7/20/1998 1998 7 20 50 82 108 95 63 2263
7/21/1998 1998 7 21 51 81 102 91.5 59.5 2322.5
7/22/1998 1998 7 22 52 73 93 83 51 2373.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
7/23/1998 1998 7 23 53 66 91 78.5 46.5 2420
7/24/1998 1998 7 24 54 73 91 82 50 2470
7/25/1998 1998 7 25 55 79 93 86 54 2524
7/26/1998 1998 7 26 56 79 91 85 53 2577
7/27/1998 1998 7 27 57 70 90 80 48 2625
7/28/1998 1998 7 28 58 70 91 80.5 48.5 2673.5
7/29/1998 1998 7 29 59 63 95 79 47 2720.5
7/30/1998 1998 7 30 60 68 95 81.5 49.5 2770
7/31/1998 1998 7 31 61 66 90 78 46 2816
8/1/1998 1998 8 1 62 61 95 78 46 2862
8/2/1998 1998 8 2 63 57 93 75 43 2905
8/3/1998 1998 8 3 64 59 95 77 45 2950
8/4/1998 1998 8 4 65 72 72 72 40 2990
8/5/1998 1998 8 5 66 63 97 80 48 3038
8/6/1998 1998 8 6 67 59 75 67 35 3073
8/7/1998 1998 8 7 68 57 108 82.5 50.5 3123.5
8/8/1998 1998 8 8 69 63 97 80 48 3171.5
8/9/1998 1998 8 9 70 63 99 81 49 3220.5
8/10/1998 1998 8 10 71 72 90 81 49 3269.5
8/11/1998 1998 8 11 72 61 102 81.5 49.5 3319
8/12/1998 1998 8 12 73 66 99 82.5 50.5 3369.5
8/13/1998 1998 8 13 74 63 99 81 49 3418.5
8/14/1998 1998 8 14 75 64 88 76 44 3462.5
8/15/1998 1998 8 15 76 63 70 66.5 34.5 3497
8/16/1998 1998 8 16 77 79 100 89.5 57.5 3554.5
8/17/1998 1998 8 17 78 75 100 87.5 55.5 3610
8/18/1998 1998 8 18 79 70 91 80.5 48.5 3658.5
8/19/1998 1998 8 19 80 57 93 75 43 3701.5
8/20/1998 1998 8 20 81 64 97 80.5 48.5 3750
8/21/1998 1998 8 21 82 66 90 78 46 3796
8/22/1998 1998 8 22 83 63 93 78 46 3842
8/23/1998 1998 8 23 84 64 100 82 50 3892
8/24/1998 1998 8 24 85 72 97 84.5 52.5 3944.5
8/25/1998 1998 8 25 86 63 91 77 45 3989.5
8/26/1998 1998 8 26 87 72 93 82.5 50.5 4040
8/27/1998 1998 8 27 88 63 91 77 45 4085
8/28/1998 1998 8 28 89 57 93 75 43 4128
8/29/1998 1998 8 29 90 54 99 76.5 44.5 4172.5
8/30/1998 1998 8 30 91 57 100 78.5 46.5 4219
8/31/1998 1998 8 31 92 68 81 74.5 42.5 4261.5
9/1/1998 1998 9 1 93 61 77 69 37 4298.5
9/2/1998 1998 9 2 94 63 88 75.5 43.5 4342
9/3/1998 1998 9 3 95 57 95 76 44 4386
9/4/1998 1998 9 4 96 66 93 79.5 47.5 4433.5
9/5/1998 1998 9 5 97 64 79 71.5 39.5 4473
9/6/1998 1998 9 6 98 64 79 71.5 39.5 4512.5
9/7/1998 1998 9 7 99 63 90 76.5 44.5 4557
9/8/1998 1998 9 8 100 59 93 76 44 4601
9/9/1998 1998 9 9 101 66 88 77 45 4646
9/10/1998 1998 9 10 102 64 82 73 41 4687
9/11/1998 1998 9 11 103 57 61 59 27 4714
9/12/1998 1998 9 12 104 57 70 63.5 31.5 4745.5
9/13/1998 1998 9 13 105 55 81 68 36 4781.5
9/14/1998 1998 9 14 106 57 84 70.5 38.5 4820
9/15/1998 1998 9 15 107 64 88 76 44 4864
9/16/1998 1998 9 16 108 55 90 72.5 40.5 4904.5
9/17/1998 1998 9 17 109 59 88 73.5 41.5 4946
9/18/1998 1998 9 18 110 66 91 78.5 46.5 4992.5
9/19/1998 1998 9 19 111 63 88 75.5 43.5 5036
9/20/1998 1998 9 20 112 66 84 75 43 5079
9/21/1998 1998 9 21 113 57 82 69.5 37.5 5116.5
9/22/1998 1998 9 22 114 54 81 67.5 35.5 5152
9/23/1998 1998 9 23 115 59 77 68 36 5188
9/24/1998 1998 9 24 116 52 82 67 35 5223
9/25/1998 1998 9 25 117 52 73 62.5 30.5 5253.5
9/26/1998 1998 9 26 118 45 79 62 30 5283.5
9/27/1998 1998 9 27 119 46 82 64 32 5315.5
9/28/1998 1998 9 28 120 45 82 63.5 31.5 5347
9/29/1998 1998 9 29 121 52 79 65.5 33.5 5380.5
9/30/1998 1998 9 30 122 52 84 68 36 5416.5
10/1/1998 1998 10 1 123 45 72 58.5 26.5 5443
10/2/1998 1998 10 2 124 45 79 62 30 5473
10/3/1998 1998 10 3 125 59 77 68 36 5509
10/4/1998 1998 10 4 126 46 59 52.5 20.5 5529.5
10/5/1998 1998 10 5 127 37 63 50 18 5547.5
10/6/1998 1998 10 6 128 32 61 46.5 14.5 5562
10/7/1998 1998 10 7 129 39 75 57 25 5587
10/8/1998 1998 10 8 130 43 72 57.5 25.5 5612.5
10/9/1998 1998 10 9 131 39 81 60 28 5640.5
10/10/1998 1998 10 10 132 39 81 60 28 5668.5
10/11/1998 1998 10 11 133 36 72 54 22 5690.5
10/12/1998 1998 10 12 134 45 77 61 29 5719.5
10/13/1998 1998 10 13 135 41 82 61.5 29.5 5749
10/14/1998 1998 10 14 136 43 72 57.5 25.5 5774.5
10/15/1998 1998 10 15 137 43 72 57.5 25.5 5800
10/16/1998 1998 10 16 138 45 50 47.5 15.5 5815.5
10/17/1998 1998 10 17 139 34 61 47.5 15.5 5831
10/18/1998 1998 10 18 140 30 63 46.5 14.5 5845.5
10/19/1998 1998 10 19 141 30 68 49 17 5862.5
10/20/1998 1998 10 20 142 34 66 50 18 5880.5
10/21/1998 1998 10 21 143 48 52 50 18 5898.5
10/22/1998 1998 10 22 144 48 59 53.5 21.5 5920
10/23/1998 1998 10 23 145 46 64 55 23 5943
10/24/1998 1998 10 24 146 37 63 50 18 5961
10/25/1998 1998 10 25 147 48 57 52.5 20.5 5981.5
10/26/1998 1998 10 26 148 45 61 53 21 6002.5
10/27/1998 1998 10 27 149 39 59 49 17 6019.5
10/28/1998 1998 10 28 150 39 63 51 19 6038.5
10/29/1998 1998 10 29 151 39 55 47 15 6053.5
10/30/1998 1998 10 30 152 43 52 47.5 15.5 6069
10/31/1998 1998 10 31 153 45 59 52 20 6089
11/1/1998 1998 11 1 154 34 57 45.5 13.5 6102.5
11/2/1998 1998 11 2 155 45 57 51 19 6121.5
11/3/1998 1998 11 3 156 37 50 43.5 11.5 6133
11/4/1998 1998 11 4 157 27 54 40.5 8.5 6141.5
11/5/1998 1998 11 5 158 27 55 41 9 6150.5
11/6/1998 1998 11 6 159 32 52 42 10 6160.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
11/7/1998 1998 11 7 160 27 52 39.5 7.5 6168
11/8/1998 1998 11 8 161 37 55 46 14 6182
11/9/1998 1998 11 9 162 36 45 40.5 8.5 6190.5
11/10/1998 1998 11 10 163 21 46 33.5 1.5 6192
11/11/1998 1998 11 11 164 32 37 34.5 2.5 6194.5
11/12/1998 1998 11 12 165 32 37 34.5 2.5 6197
11/13/1998 1998 11 13 166 32 48 40 8 6205
11/14/1998 1998 11 14 167 28 54 41 9 6214
11/15/1998 1998 11 15 168 28 55 41.5 9.5 6223.5
11/16/1998 1998 11 16 169 28 57 42.5 10.5 6234
11/17/1998 1998 11 17 170 32 63 47.5 15.5 6249.5
11/18/1998 1998 11 18 171 28 54 41 9 6258.5
11/19/1998 1998 11 19 172 21 50 35.5 3.5 6262
11/20/1998 1998 11 20 173 19 46 32.5 0.5 6262.5
11/21/1998 1998 11 21 174 21 34 27.5 -4.5 6258
11/22/1998 1998 11 22 175 19 57 38 6 6264
11/23/1998 1998 11 23 176 27 61 44 12 6276
11/24/1998 1998 11 24 177 37 64 50.5 18.5 6294.5
11/25/1998 1998 11 25 178 25 43 34 2 6296.5
11/26/1998 1998 11 26 179 25 61 43 11 6307.5
11/27/1998 1998 11 27 180 23 45 34 2 6309.5
11/28/1998 1998 11 28 181 28 57 42.5 10.5 6320
11/29/1998 1998 11 29 182 37 57 47 15 6335
11/30/1998 1998 11 30 183 30 55 42.5 10.5 6345.5
12/1/1998 1998 12 1 184 28 54 41 9 6354.5
12/2/1998 1998 12 2 185 27 57 42 10 6364.5
12/3/1998 1998 12 3 186 37 54 45.5 13.5 6378
12/4/1998 1998 12 4 187 39 54 46.5 14.5 6392.5
12/5/1998 1998 12 5 188 19 39 29 -3 6389.5
12/6/1998 1998 12 6 189 19 34 26.5 -5.5 6384
12/7/1998 1998 12 7 190 18 32 25 -7 6377
12/8/1998 1998 12 8 191 12 34 23 -9 6368
12/9/1998 1998 12 9 192 25 43 34 2 6370
12/10/1998 1998 12 10 193 12 28 20 -12 6358
12/11/1998 1998 12 11 194 21 39 30 -2 6356
12/12/1998 1998 12 12 195 18 45 31.5 -0.5 6355.5
12/13/1998 1998 12 13 196 16 46 31 -1 6354.5
12/14/1998 1998 12 14 197 16 45 30.5 -1.5 6353
12/15/1998 1998 12 15 198 16 23 19.5 -12.5 6340.5
12/16/1998 1998 12 16 199 18 52 35 3 6343.5
12/17/1998 1998 12 17 200 18 50 34 2 6345.5
12/18/1998 1998 12 18 201 16 45 30.5 -1.5 6344
12/19/1998 1998 12 19 202 19 57 38 6 6350
12/20/1998 1998 12 20 203 23 36 29.5 -2.5 6347.5
12/21/1998 1998 12 21 204 -8 28 10 -22 6325.5
12/22/1998 1998 12 22 205 -9 3 -3 -35 6290.5
12/23/1998 1998 12 23 206 -8 9 0.5 -31.5 6259
12/24/1998 1998 12 24 207 5 19 12 -20 6239
12/25/1998 1998 12 25 208 -2 25 11.5 -20.5 6218.5
12/26/1998 1998 12 26 209 3 28 15.5 -16.5 6202
12/27/1998 1998 12 27 210 3 32 17.5 -14.5 6187.5
12/28/1998 1998 12 28 211 7 32 19.5 -12.5 6175
12/29/1998 1998 12 29 212 10 27 18.5 -13.5 6161.5
12/30/1998 1998 12 30 213 12 37 24.5 -7.5 6154
12/31/1998 1998 12 31 214 28 39 33.5 1.5 6155.5
1/1/1999 1999 1 1 215 34 52 43 11 6166.5
1/2/1999 1999 1 2 216 19 50 34.5 2.5 6169
1/3/1999 1999 1 3 217 18 39 28.5 -3.5 6165.5
1/4/1999 1999 1 4 218 28 43 35.5 3.5 6169
1/5/1999 1999 1 5 219 18 45 31.5 -0.5 6168.5
1/6/1999 1999 1 6 220 18 43 30.5 -1.5 6167
1/7/1999 1999 1 7 221 25 39 32 0 6167
1/8/1999 1999 1 8 222 27 50 38.5 6.5 6173.5
1/9/1999 1999 1 9 223 16 46 31 -1 6172.5
1/10/1999 1999 1 10 224 25 32 28.5 -3.5 6169
1/11/1999 1999 1 11 225 18 45 31.5 -0.5 6168.5
1/12/1999 1999 1 12 226 25 52 38.5 6.5 6175
1/13/1999 1999 1 13 227 25 52 38.5 6.5 6181.5
1/14/1999 1999 1 14 228 25 46 35.5 3.5 6185
1/15/1999 1999 1 15 229 19 39 29 -3 6182
1/16/1999 1999 1 16 230 23 46 34.5 2.5 6184.5
1/17/1999 1999 1 17 231 18 48 33 1 6185.5
1/18/1999 1999 1 18 232 27 50 38.5 6.5 6192
1/19/1999 1999 1 19 233 28 59 43.5 11.5 6203.5
1/20/1999 1999 1 20 234 28 57 42.5 10.5 6214
1/21/1999 1999 1 21 235 34 45 39.5 7.5 6221.5
1/22/1999 1999 1 22 236 27 46 36.5 4.5 6226
1/23/1999 1999 1 23 237 19 55 37 5 6231
1/24/1999 1999 1 24 238 37 61 49 17 6248
1/25/1999 1999 1 25 239 34 48 41 9 6257
1/26/1999 1999 1 26 240 36 46 41 9 6266
1/27/1999 1999 1 27 241 21 34 27.5 -4.5 6261.5
1/28/1999 1999 1 28 242 21 48 34.5 2.5 6264
1/29/1999 1999 1 29 243 12 48 30 -2 6262
1/30/1999 1999 1 30 244 14 48 31 -1 6261
1/31/1999 1999 1 31 245 19 46 32.5 0.5 6261.5
2/1/1999 1999 2 1 246 19 46 32.5 0.5 6262
2/2/1999 1999 2 2 247 12 37 24.5 -7.5 6254.5
2/3/1999 1999 2 3 248 21 61 41 9 6263.5
2/4/1999 1999 2 4 249 21 45 33 1 6264.5
2/5/1999 1999 2 5 250 32 48 40 8 6272.5
2/6/1999 1999 2 6 251 32 48 40 8 6280.5
2/7/1999 1999 2 7 252 27 55 41 9 6289.5
2/8/1999 1999 2 8 253 45 61 53 21 6310.5
2/9/1999 1999 2 9 254 43 63 53 21 6331.5
2/10/1999 1999 2 10 255 25 52 38.5 6.5 6338
2/11/1999 1999 2 11 256 19 34 26.5 -5.5 6332.5
2/12/1999 1999 2 12 257 19 43 31 -1 6331.5
2/13/1999 1999 2 13 258 9 25 17 -15 6316.5
2/14/1999 1999 2 14 259 18 34 26 -6 6310.5
2/15/1999 1999 2 15 260 34 57 45.5 13.5 6324
2/16/1999 1999 2 16 261 25 52 38.5 6.5 6330.5
2/17/1999 1999 2 17 262 30 63 46.5 14.5 6345
2/18/1999 1999 2 18 263 28 55 41.5 9.5 6354.5
2/19/1999 1999 2 19 264 28 37 32.5 0.5 6355
2/20/1999 1999 2 20 265 18 48 33 1 6356
2/21/1999 1999 2 21 266 30 61 45.5 13.5 6369.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
2/22/1999 1999 2 22 267 28 52 40 8 6377.5
2/23/1999 1999 2 23 268 18 55 36.5 4.5 6382
2/24/1999 1999 2 24 269 19 63 41 9 6391
2/25/1999 1999 2 25 270 30 64 47 15 6406
2/26/1999 1999 2 26 271 34 57 45.5 13.5 6419.5
2/27/1999 1999 2 27 272 21 57 39 7 6426.5
2/28/1999 1999 2 28 273 52 64 58 26 6452.5
3/1/1999 1999 3 1 274 28 70 49 17 6469.5
3/2/1999 1999 3 2 275 37 64 50.5 18.5 6488
3/3/1999 1999 3 3 276 27 70 48.5 16.5 6504.5
3/4/1999 1999 3 4 277 45 66 55.5 23.5 6528
3/5/1999 1999 3 5 278 28 48 38 6 6534
3/6/1999 1999 3 6 279 30 61 45.5 13.5 6547.5
3/7/1999 1999 3 7 280 27 59 43 11 6558.5
3/8/1999 1999 3 8 281 28 55 41.5 9.5 6568
3/9/1999 1999 3 9 282 45 57 51 19 6587
3/10/1999 1999 3 10 283 30 59 44.5 12.5 6599.5
3/11/1999 1999 3 11 284 30 57 43.5 11.5 6611
3/12/1999 1999 3 12 285 37 55 46 14 6625
3/13/1999 1999 3 13 286 25 46 35.5 3.5 6628.5
3/14/1999 1999 3 14 287 25 61 43 11 6639.5
3/15/1999 1999 3 15 288 32 70 51 19 6658.5
3/16/1999 1999 3 16 289 36 72 54 22 6680.5
3/17/1999 1999 3 17 290 30 70 50 18 6698.5
3/18/1999 1999 3 18 291 36 55 45.5 13.5 6712
3/19/1999 1999 3 19 292 30 75 52.5 20.5 6732.5
3/20/1999 1999 3 20 293 34 72 53 21 6753.5
3/21/1999 1999 3 21 294 55 72 63.5 31.5 6785
3/22/1999 1999 3 22 295 43 68 55.5 23.5 6808.5
3/23/1999 1999 3 23 296 28 61 44.5 12.5 6821
3/24/1999 1999 3 24 297 27 30 28.5 -3.5 6817.5
3/25/1999 1999 3 25 298 39 70 54.5 22.5 6840
3/26/1999 1999 3 26 299 36 72 54 22 6862
3/27/1999 1999 3 27 300 43 68 55.5 23.5 6885.5
3/28/1999 1999 3 28 301 28 66 47 15 6900.5
3/29/1999 1999 3 29 302 27 75 51 19 6919.5
3/30/1999 1999 3 30 303 55 73 64 32 6951.5
3/31/1999 1999 3 31 304 45 64 54.5 22.5 6974
4/1/1999 1999 4 1 305 37 52 44.5 12.5 6986.5
4/2/1999 1999 4 2 306 16 45 30.5 -1.5 6985
4/3/1999 1999 4 3 307 27 45 36 4 6989
4/4/1999 1999 4 4 308 36 48 42 10 6999
4/5/1999 1999 4 5 309 28 54 41 9 7008
4/6/1999 1999 4 6 310 32 54 43 11 7019
4/7/1999 1999 4 7 311 32 68 50 18 7037
4/8/1999 1999 4 8 312 37 61 49 17 7054
4/9/1999 1999 4 9 313 37 46 41.5 9.5 7063.5
4/10/1999 1999 4 10 314 39 50 44.5 12.5 7076
4/11/1999 1999 4 11 315 27 63 45 13 7089
4/12/1999 1999 4 12 316 36 68 52 20 7109
4/13/1999 1999 4 13 317 52 73 62.5 30.5 7139.5
4/14/1999 1999 4 14 318 52 66 59 27 7166.5
4/15/1999 1999 4 15 319 37 55 46 14 7180.5
4/16/1999 1999 4 16 320 27 59 43 11 7191.5
4/17/1999 1999 4 17 321 43 70 56.5 24.5 7216
4/18/1999 1999 4 18 322 39 82 60.5 28.5 7244.5
4/19/1999 1999 4 19 323 37 84 60.5 28.5 7273
4/20/1999 1999 4 20 324 46 75 60.5 28.5 7301.5
4/21/1999 1999 4 21 325 45 63 54 22 7323.5
4/22/1999 1999 4 22 326 43 48 45.5 13.5 7337
4/23/1999 1999 4 23 327 43 59 51 19 7356
4/24/1999 1999 4 24 328 50 63 56.5 24.5 7380.5
4/25/1999 1999 4 25 329 37 57 47 15 7395.5
4/26/1999 1999 4 26 330 41 73 57 25 7420.5
4/27/1999 1999 4 27 331 52 73 62.5 30.5 7451
4/28/1999 1999 4 28 332 54 61 57.5 25.5 7476.5
4/29/1999 1999 4 29 333 46 57 51.5 19.5 7496
4/30/1999 1999 4 30 334 43 63 53 21 7517
5/1/1999 1999 5 1 335 45 72 58.5 26.5 7543.5
5/2/1999 1999 5 2 336 41 75 58 26 7569.5
5/3/1999 1999 5 3 337 45 57 51 19 7588.5
5/4/1999 1999 5 4 338 45 54 49.5 17.5 7606
5/5/1999 1999 5 5 339 36 61 48.5 16.5 7622.5
5/6/1999 1999 5 6 340 34 70 52 20 7642.5
5/7/1999 1999 5 7 341 37 82 59.5 27.5 7670
5/8/1999 1999 5 8 342 45 82 63.5 31.5 7701.5
5/9/1999 1999 5 9 343 63 79 71 39 7740.5
5/10/1999 1999 5 10 344 45 57 51 19 7759.5
5/11/1999 1999 5 11 345 41 66 53.5 21.5 7781
5/12/1999 1999 5 12 346 39 77 58 26 7807
5/13/1999 1999 5 13 347 70 73 71.5 39.5 7846.5
5/14/1999 1999 5 14 348 57 75 66 34 7880.5
5/15/1999 1999 5 15 349 63 77 70 38 7918.5
5/16/1999 1999 5 16 350 50 66 58 26 7944.5
5/17/1999 1999 5 17 351 48 73 60.5 28.5 7973
5/18/1999 1999 5 18 352 39 82 60.5 28.5 8001.5
5/19/1999 1999 5 19 353 57 84 70.5 38.5 8040
5/20/1999 1999 5 20 354 45 84 64.5 32.5 8072.5
5/21/1999 1999 5 21 355 46 84 65 33 8105.5
5/22/1999 1999 5 22 356 43 91 67 35 8140.5
5/23/1999 1999 5 23 357 64 84 74 42 8182.5
5/24/1999 1999 5 24 358 57 82 69.5 37.5 8220
5/25/1999 1999 5 25 359 64 81 72.5 40.5 8260.5
5/26/1999 1999 5 26 360 55 81 68 36 8296.5
5/27/1999 1999 5 27 361 57 84 70.5 38.5 8335
5/28/1999 1999 5 28 362 54 81 67.5 35.5 8370.5
5/29/1999 1999 5 29 363 66 84 75 43 8413.5
5/30/1999 1999 5 30 364 57 90 73.5 41.5 8455
5/31/1999 1999 5 31 365 63 81 72 40 8495
6/1/1999 1999 6 1 1 46 75 60.5 28.5 28.5
6/2/1999 1999 6 2 2 54 68 61 29 57.5
6/3/1999 1999 6 3 3 46 46 46 14 71.5
6/4/1999 1999 6 4 4 50 57 53.5 21.5 93
6/5/1999 1999 6 5 5 46 64 55 23 116
6/6/1999 1999 6 6 6 48 68 58 26 142
6/7/1999 1999 6 7 7 48 84 66 34 176
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
6/8/1999 1999 6 8 8 73 82 77.5 45.5 221.5
6/9/1999 1999 6 9 9 57 86 71.5 39.5 261
6/10/1999 1999 6 10 10 55 82 68.5 36.5 297.5
6/11/1999 1999 6 11 11 52 88 70 38 335.5
6/12/1999 1999 6 12 12 52 88 70 38 373.5
6/13/1999 1999 6 13 13 68 93 80.5 48.5 422
6/14/1999 1999 6 14 14 64 91 77.5 45.5 467.5
6/15/1999 1999 6 15 15 68 93 80.5 48.5 516
6/16/1999 1999 6 16 16 70 90 80 48 564
6/17/1999 1999 6 17 17 63 84 73.5 41.5 605.5
6/18/1999 1999 6 18 18 55 90 72.5 40.5 646
6/19/1999 1999 6 19 19 57 95 76 44 690
6/20/1999 1999 6 20 20 63 99 81 49 739
6/21/1999 1999 6 21 21 61 82 71.5 39.5 778.5
6/22/1999 1999 6 22 22 59 95 77 45 823.5
6/23/1999 1999 6 23 23 55 100 77.5 45.5 869
6/24/1999 1999 6 24 24 61 100 80.5 48.5 917.5
6/25/1999 1999 6 25 25 66 97 81.5 49.5 967
6/26/1999 1999 6 26 26 61 100 80.5 48.5 1015.5
6/27/1999 1999 6 27 27 70 102 86 54 1069.5
6/28/1999 1999 6 28 28 54 102 78 46 1115.5
6/29/1999 1999 6 29 29 61 97 79 47 1162.5
6/30/1999 1999 6 30 30 61 100 80.5 48.5 1211
7/1/1999 1999 7 1 31 63 106 84.5 52.5 1263.5
7/2/1999 1999 7 2 32 90 102 96 64 1327.5
7/3/1999 1999 7 3 33 81 95 88 56 1383.5
7/4/1999 1999 7 4 34 81 99 90 58 1441.5
7/5/1999 1999 7 5 35 57 102 79.5 47.5 1489
7/6/1999 1999 7 6 36 72 104 88 56 1545
7/7/1999 1999 7 7 37 66 90 78 46 1591
7/8/1999 1999 7 8 38 68 90 79 47 1638
7/9/1999 1999 7 9 39 68 95 81.5 49.5 1687.5
7/10/1999 1999 7 10 40 66 84 75 43 1730.5
7/11/1999 1999 7 11 41 73 91 82 50 1780.5
7/12/1999 1999 7 12 42 63 99 81 49 1829.5
7/13/1999 1999 7 13 43 68 93 80.5 48.5 1878
7/14/1999 1999 7 14 44 70 84 77 45 1923
7/15/1999 1999 7 15 45 64 90 77 45 1968
7/16/1999 1999 7 16 46 63 88 75.5 43.5 2011.5
7/17/1999 1999 7 17 47 63 93 78 46 2057.5
7/18/1999 1999 7 18 48 66 95 80.5 48.5 2106
7/19/1999 1999 7 19 49 73 90 81.5 49.5 2155.5
7/20/1999 1999 7 20 50 72 90 81 49 2204.5
7/21/1999 1999 7 21 51 64 97 80.5 48.5 2253
7/22/1999 1999 7 22 52 72 95 83.5 51.5 2304.5
7/23/1999 1999 7 23 53 64 99 81.5 49.5 2354
7/24/1999 1999 7 24 54 70 100 85 53 2407
7/25/1999 1999 7 25 55 72 97 84.5 52.5 2459.5
7/26/1999 1999 7 26 56 70 93 81.5 49.5 2509
7/27/1999 1999 7 27 57 68 93 80.5 48.5 2557.5
7/28/1999 1999 7 28 58 70 91 80.5 48.5 2606
7/29/1999 1999 7 29 59 68 97 82.5 50.5 2656.5
7/30/1999 1999 7 30 60 66 82 74 42 2698.5
7/31/1999 1999 7 31 61 63 84 73.5 41.5 2740
8/1/1999 1999 8 1 62 61 93 77 45 2785
8/2/1999 1999 8 2 63 63 95 79 47 2832
8/3/1999 1999 8 3 64 68 82 75 43 2875
8/4/1999 1999 8 4 65 64 84 74 42 2917
8/5/1999 1999 8 5 66 63 82 72.5 40.5 2957.5
8/6/1999 1999 8 6 67 57 88 72.5 40.5 2998
8/7/1999 1999 8 7 68 63 93 78 46 3044
8/8/1999 1999 8 8 69 61 91 76 44 3088
8/9/1999 1999 8 9 70 64 93 78.5 46.5 3134.5
8/10/1999 1999 8 10 71 70 75 72.5 40.5 3175
8/11/1999 1999 8 11 72 63 84 73.5 41.5 3216.5
8/12/1999 1999 8 12 73 57 90 73.5 41.5 3258
8/13/1999 1999 8 13 74 57 95 76 44 3302
8/14/1999 1999 8 14 75 57 86 71.5 39.5 3341.5
8/15/1999 1999 8 15 76 68 88 78 46 3387.5
8/16/1999 1999 8 16 77 63 90 76.5 44.5 3432
8/17/1999 1999 8 17 78 63 90 76.5 44.5 3476.5
8/18/1999 1999 8 18 79 61 91 76 44 3520.5
8/19/1999 1999 8 19 80 72 88 80 48 3568.5
8/20/1999 1999 8 20 81 64 88 76 44 3612.5
8/21/1999 1999 8 21 82 64 81 72.5 40.5 3653
8/22/1999 1999 8 22 83 61 93 77 45 3698
8/23/1999 1999 8 23 84 63 93 78 46 3744
8/24/1999 1999 8 24 85 63 88 75.5 43.5 3787.5
8/25/1999 1999 8 25 86 70 91 80.5 48.5 3836
8/26/1999 1999 8 26 87 63 90 76.5 44.5 3880.5
8/27/1999 1999 8 27 88 64 81 72.5 40.5 3921
8/28/1999 1999 8 28 89 63 88 75.5 43.5 3964.5
8/29/1999 1999 8 29 90 66 95 80.5 48.5 4013
8/30/1999 1999 8 30 91 72 88 80 48 4061
8/31/1999 1999 8 31 92 68 84 76 44 4105
9/1/1999 1999 9 1 93 68 81 74.5 42.5 4147.5
9/2/1999 1999 9 2 94 55 84 69.5 37.5 4185
9/3/1999 1999 9 3 95 55 84 69.5 37.5 4222.5
9/4/1999 1999 9 4 96 59 84 71.5 39.5 4262
9/5/1999 1999 9 5 97 48 88 68 36 4298
9/6/1999 1999 9 6 98 55 93 74 42 4340
9/7/1999 1999 9 7 99 55 93 74 42 4382
9/8/1999 1999 9 8 100 50 90 70 38 4420
9/9/1999 1999 9 9 101 52 82 67 35 4455
9/10/1999 1999 9 10 102 55 91 73 41 4496
9/11/1999 1999 9 11 103 59 82 70.5 38.5 4534.5
9/12/1999 1999 9 12 104 55 90 72.5 40.5 4575
9/13/1999 1999 9 13 105 52 64 58 26 4601
9/14/1999 1999 9 14 106 63 77 70 38 4639
9/15/1999 1999 9 15 107 57 73 65 33 4672
9/16/1999 1999 9 16 108 48 73 60.5 28.5 4700.5
9/17/1999 1999 9 17 109 45 82 63.5 31.5 4732
9/18/1999 1999 9 18 110 46 82 64 32 4764
9/19/1999 1999 9 19 111 55 82 68.5 36.5 4800.5
9/20/1999 1999 9 20 112 54 68 61 29 4829.5
9/21/1999 1999 9 21 113 54 79 66.5 34.5 4864
9/22/1999 1999 9 22 114 48 79 63.5 31.5 4895.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
9/23/1999 1999 9 23 115 57 81 69 37 4932.5
9/24/1999 1999 9 24 116 57 84 70.5 38.5 4971
9/25/1999 1999 9 25 117 54 91 72.5 40.5 5011.5
9/26/1999 1999 9 26 118 59 90 74.5 42.5 5054
9/27/1999 1999 9 27 119 61 61 61 29 5083
9/28/1999 1999 9 28 120 45 63 54 22 5105
9/29/1999 1999 9 29 121 32 70 51 19 5124
9/30/1999 1999 9 30 122 34 75 54.5 22.5 5146.5
10/1/1999 1999 10 1 123 37 88 62.5 30.5 5177
10/2/1999 1999 10 2 124 41 81 61 29 5206
10/3/1999 1999 10 3 125 43 81 62 30 5236
10/4/1999 1999 10 4 126 54 81 67.5 35.5 5271.5
10/5/1999 1999 10 5 127 39 70 54.5 22.5 5294
10/6/1999 1999 10 6 128 48 81 64.5 32.5 5326.5
10/7/1999 1999 10 7 129 54 68 61 29 5355.5
10/8/1999 1999 10 8 130 43 73 58 26 5381.5
10/9/1999 1999 10 9 131 37 81 59 27 5408.5
10/10/1999 1999 10 10 132 39 82 60.5 28.5 5437
10/11/1999 1999 10 11 133 39 86 62.5 30.5 5467.5
10/12/1999 1999 10 12 134 43 84 63.5 31.5 5499
10/13/1999 1999 10 13 135 37 82 59.5 27.5 5526.5
10/14/1999 1999 10 14 136 34 84 59 27 5553.5
10/15/1999 1999 10 15 137 39 79 59 27 5580.5
10/16/1999 1999 10 16 138 34 54 44 12 5592.5
10/17/1999 1999 10 17 139 28 61 44.5 12.5 5605
10/18/1999 1999 10 18 140 27 70 48.5 16.5 5621.5
10/19/1999 1999 10 19 141 34 52 43 11 5632.5
10/20/1999 1999 10 20 142 27 52 39.5 7.5 5640
10/21/1999 1999 10 21 143 39 72 55.5 23.5 5663.5
10/22/1999 1999 10 22 144 28 73 50.5 18.5 5682
10/23/1999 1999 10 23 145 28 75 51.5 19.5 5701.5
10/24/1999 1999 10 24 146 27 73 50 18 5719.5
10/25/1999 1999 10 25 147 28 75 51.5 19.5 5739
10/26/1999 1999 10 26 148 30 70 50 18 5757
10/27/1999 1999 10 27 149 30 73 51.5 19.5 5776.5
10/28/1999 1999 10 28 150 34 75 54.5 22.5 5799
10/29/1999 1999 10 29 151 43 63 53 21 5820
10/30/1999 1999 10 30 152 27 63 45 13 5833
10/31/1999 1999 10 31 153 25 64 44.5 12.5 5845.5
11/1/1999 1999 11 1 154 25 68 46.5 14.5 5860
11/2/1999 1999 11 2 155 27 64 45.5 13.5 5873.5
11/3/1999 1999 11 3 156 25 66 45.5 13.5 5887
11/4/1999 1999 11 4 157 25 66 45.5 13.5 5900.5
11/5/1999 1999 11 5 158 27 68 47.5 15.5 5916
11/6/1999 1999 11 6 159 27 50 38.5 6.5 5922.5
11/7/1999 1999 11 7 160 28 64 46 14 5936.5
11/8/1999 1999 11 8 161 30 70 50 18 5954.5
11/9/1999 1999 11 9 162 32 63 47.5 15.5 5970
11/10/1999 1999 11 10 163 27 63 45 13 5983
11/11/1999 1999 11 11 164 39 64 51.5 19.5 6002.5
11/12/1999 1999 11 12 165 30 64 47 15 6017.5
11/13/1999 1999 11 13 166 19 64 41.5 9.5 6027
11/14/1999 1999 11 14 167 30 64 47 15 6042
11/15/1999 1999 11 15 168 18 61 39.5 7.5 6049.5
11/16/1999 1999 11 16 169 23 57 40 8 6057.5
11/17/1999 1999 11 17 170 36 68 52 20 6077.5
11/18/1999 1999 11 18 171 28 55 41.5 9.5 6087
11/19/1999 1999 11 19 172 18 52 35 3 6090
11/20/1999 1999 11 20 173 21 54 37.5 5.5 6095.5
11/21/1999 1999 11 21 174 34 48 41 9 6104.5
11/22/1999 1999 11 22 175 25 43 34 2 6106.5
11/23/1999 1999 11 23 176 12 41 26.5 -5.5 6101
11/24/1999 1999 11 24 177 10 43 26.5 -5.5 6095.5
11/25/1999 1999 11 25 178 12 46 29 -3 6092.5
11/26/1999 1999 11 26 179 14 50 32 0 6092.5
11/27/1999 1999 11 27 180 23 45 34 2 6094.5
11/28/1999 1999 11 28 181 14 50 32 0 6094.5
11/29/1999 1999 11 29 182 30 55 42.5 10.5 6105
11/30/1999 1999 11 30 183 25 43 34 2 6107
12/1/1999 1999 12 1 184 19 55 37 5 6112
12/2/1999 1999 12 2 185 19 48 33.5 1.5 6113.5
12/3/1999 1999 12 3 186 36 45 40.5 8.5 6122
12/4/1999 1999 12 4 187 19 46 32.5 0.5 6122.5
12/5/1999 1999 12 5 188 9 41 25 -7 6115.5
12/6/1999 1999 12 6 189 10 45 27.5 -4.5 6111
12/7/1999 1999 12 7 190 18 45 31.5 -0.5 6110.5
12/8/1999 1999 12 8 191 25 46 35.5 3.5 6114
12/9/1999 1999 12 9 192 9 10 9.5 -22.5 6091.5
12/10/1999 1999 12 10 193 27 36 31.5 -0.5 6091
12/11/1999 1999 12 11 194 14 28 21 -11 6080
12/12/1999 1999 12 12 195 14 39 26.5 -5.5 6074.5
12/13/1999 1999 12 13 196 21 45 33 1 6075.5
12/14/1999 1999 12 14 197 14 36 25 -7 6068.5
12/15/1999 1999 12 15 198 7 34 20.5 -11.5 6057
12/16/1999 1999 12 16 199 10 39 24.5 -7.5 6049.5
12/17/1999 1999 12 17 200 10 45 27.5 -4.5 6045
12/18/1999 1999 12 18 201 16 50 33 1 6046
12/19/1999 1999 12 19 202 16 48 32 0 6046
12/20/1999 1999 12 20 203 28 43 35.5 3.5 6049.5
12/21/1999 1999 12 21 204 21 43 32 0 6049.5
12/22/1999 1999 12 22 205 9 43 26 -6 6043.5
12/23/1999 1999 12 23 206 19 45 32 0 6043.5
12/24/1999 1999 12 24 207 12 46 29 -3 6040.5
12/25/1999 1999 12 25 208 10 43 26.5 -5.5 6035
12/26/1999 1999 12 26 209 23 48 35.5 3.5 6038.5
12/27/1999 1999 12 27 210 10 52 31 -1 6037.5
12/28/1999 1999 12 28 211 12 50 31 -1 6036.5
12/29/1999 1999 12 29 212 14 46 30 -2 6034.5
12/30/1999 1999 12 30 213 9 45 27 -5 6029.5
12/31/1999 1999 12 31 214 10 39 24.5 -7.5 6022
1/1/2000 2000 1 1 215 32 45 38.5 6.5 6028.5
1/2/2000 2000 1 2 216 29 42 35.5 3.5 6032
1/3/2000 2000 1 3 217 20 40 30 -2 6030
1/4/2000 2000 1 4 218 22 38 30 -2 6028
1/5/2000 2000 1 5 219 22 41 31.5 -0.5 6027.5
1/6/2000 2000 1 6 220 24 39 31.5 -0.5 6027
1/7/2000 2000 1 7 221 21 36 28.5 -3.5 6023.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
1/8/2000 2000 1 8 222 21 39 30 -2 6021.5
1/10/2000 2000 1 10 224 34 60 47 15 6036.5
1/11/2000 2000 1 11 225 34 52 43 11 6047.5
1/12/2000 2000 1 12 226 36 56 46 14 6061.5
1/13/2000 2000 1 13 227 32 54 43 11 6072.5
1/14/2000 2000 1 14 228 33 51 42 10 6082.5
1/15/2000 2000 1 15 229 34 53 43.5 11.5 6094
1/16/2000 2000 1 16 230 36 54 45 13 6107
1/17/2000 2000 1 17 231 45 52 48.5 16.5 6123.5
1/18/2000 2000 1 18 232 43 58 50.5 18.5 6142
1/19/2000 2000 1 19 233 40 59 49.5 17.5 6159.5
1/20/2000 2000 1 20 234 43 58 50.5 18.5 6178
1/21/2000 2000 1 21 235 42 60 51 19 6197
1/22/2000 2000 1 22 236 38 57 47.5 15.5 6212.5
1/23/2000 2000 1 23 237 35 51 43 11 6223.5
1/24/2000 2000 1 24 238 41 54 47.5 15.5 6239
1/25/2000 2000 1 25 239 47 53 50 18 6257
1/26/2000 2000 1 26 240 41 50 45.5 13.5 6270.5
1/27/2000 2000 1 27 241 34 48 41 9 6279.5
1/28/2000 2000 1 28 242 29 44 36.5 4.5 6284
1/29/2000 2000 1 29 243 23 44 33.5 1.5 6285.5
1/30/2000 2000 1 30 244 27 45 36 4 6289.5
1/31/2000 2000 1 31 245 36 47 41.5 9.5 6299
2/1/2000 2000 2 1 246 29 50 39.5 7.5 6306.5
2/2/2000 2000 2 2 247 30 51 40.5 8.5 6315
2/3/2000 2000 2 3 248 29 52 40.5 8.5 6323.5
2/4/2000 2000 2 4 249 35 50 42.5 10.5 6334
2/5/2000 2000 2 5 250 35 50 42.5 10.5 6344.5
2/6/2000 2000 2 6 251 33 55 44 12 6356.5
2/7/2000 2000 2 7 252 33 57 45 13 6369.5
2/8/2000 2000 2 8 253 35 55 45 13 6382.5
2/9/2000 2000 2 9 254 42 56 49 17 6399.5
2/10/2000 2000 2 10 255 44 59 51.5 19.5 6419
2/11/2000 2000 2 11 256 40 56 48 16 6435
2/12/2000 2000 2 12 257 43 54 48.5 16.5 6451.5
2/13/2000 2000 2 13 258 33 47 40 8 6459.5
2/14/2000 2000 2 14 259 37 58 47.5 15.5 6475
2/15/2000 2000 2 15 260 39 63 51 19 6494
2/16/2000 2000 2 16 261 40 55 47.5 15.5 6509.5
2/17/2000 2000 2 17 262 35 48 41.5 9.5 6519
2/18/2000 2000 2 18 263 34 52 43 11 6530
2/19/2000 2000 2 19 264 33 52 42.5 10.5 6540.5
2/20/2000 2000 2 20 265 39 55 47 15 6555.5
2/21/2000 2000 2 21 266 37 52 44.5 12.5 6568
2/22/2000 2000 2 22 267 36 53 44.5 12.5 6580.5
2/23/2000 2000 2 23 268 35 51 43 11 6591.5
2/24/2000 2000 2 24 269 35 50 42.5 10.5 6602
2/25/2000 2000 2 25 270 29 45 37 5 6607
2/26/2000 2000 2 26 271 30 50 40 8 6615
2/27/2000 2000 2 27 272 33 57 45 13 6628
2/28/2000 2000 2 28 273 39 53 46 14 6642
2/29/2000 2000 2 29 274 31 52 41.5 9.5 6651.5
3/1/2000 2000 3 1 275 38 48 43 11 6662.5
3/2/2000 2000 3 2 276 35 55 45 13 6675.5
3/3/2000 2000 3 3 277 36 59 47.5 15.5 6691
3/4/2000 2000 3 4 278 39 64 51.5 19.5 6710.5
3/5/2000 2000 3 5 279 38 55 46.5 14.5 6725
3/6/2000 2000 3 6 280 36 46 41 9 6734
3/7/2000 2000 3 7 281 37 52 44.5 12.5 6746.5
3/8/2000 2000 3 8 282 39 50 44.5 12.5 6759
3/9/2000 2000 3 9 283 36 53 44.5 12.5 6771.5
3/10/2000 2000 3 10 284 32 54 43 11 6782.5
3/11/2000 2000 3 11 285 35 58 46.5 14.5 6797
3/12/2000 2000 3 12 286 38 61 49.5 17.5 6814.5
3/13/2000 2000 3 13 287 41 63 52 20 6834.5
3/14/2000 2000 3 14 288 40 68 54 22 6856.5
3/15/2000 2000 3 15 289 45 69 57 25 6881.5
3/16/2000 2000 3 16 290 36 55 45.5 13.5 6895
3/17/2000 2000 3 17 291 39 61 50 18 6913
3/18/2000 2000 3 18 292 41 58 49.5 17.5 6930.5
3/19/2000 2000 3 19 293 36 64 50 18 6948.5
3/20/2000 2000 3 20 294 29 63 46 14 6962.5
3/21/2000 2000 3 21 295 32 37 34.5 2.5 6965
3/22/2000 2000 3 22 296 31 54 42.5 10.5 6975.5
3/23/2000 2000 3 23 297 37 64 50.5 18.5 6994
3/24/2000 2000 3 24 298 41 64 52.5 20.5 7014.5
3/25/2000 2000 3 25 299 44 69 56.5 24.5 7039
3/26/2000 2000 3 26 300 47 73 60 28 7067
3/27/2000 2000 3 27 301 47 70 58.5 26.5 7093.5
3/28/2000 2000 3 28 302 45 63 54 22 7115.5
3/29/2000 2000 3 29 303 45 63 54 22 7137.5
3/30/2000 2000 3 30 304 44 56 50 18 7155.5
3/31/2000 2000 3 31 305 43 53 48 16 7171.5
4/1/2000 2000 4 1 306 45 60 52.5 20.5 7192
4/2/2000 2000 4 2 307 37 68 52.5 20.5 7212.5
4/3/2000 2000 4 3 308 48 72 60 28 7240.5
4/4/2000 2000 4 4 309 48 79 63.5 31.5 7272
4/5/2000 2000 4 5 310 51 81 66 34 7306
4/6/2000 2000 4 6 311 56 80 68 36 7342
4/7/2000 2000 4 7 312 53 78 65.5 33.5 7375.5
4/8/2000 2000 4 8 313 51 77 64 32 7407.5
4/9/2000 2000 4 9 314 55 81 68 36 7443.5
4/10/2000 2000 4 10 315 48 71 59.5 27.5 7471
4/11/2000 2000 4 11 316 47 73 60 28 7499
4/12/2000 2000 4 12 317 51 78 64.5 32.5 7531.5
4/13/2000 2000 4 13 318 53 81 67 35 7566.5
4/14/2000 2000 4 14 319 50 72 61 29 7595.5
4/15/2000 2000 4 15 320 48 69 58.5 26.5 7622
4/16/2000 2000 4 16 321 49 74 61.5 29.5 7651.5
4/17/2000 2000 4 17 322 49 82 65.5 33.5 7685
4/18/2000 2000 4 18 323 46 63 54.5 22.5 7707.5
4/19/2000 2000 4 19 324 39 67 53 21 7728.5
4/20/2000 2000 4 20 325 45 74 59.5 27.5 7756
4/21/2000 2000 4 21 326 53 81 67 35 7791
4/22/2000 2000 4 22 327 48 73 60.5 28.5 7819.5
4/23/2000 2000 4 23 328 50 78 64 32 7851.5
4/24/2000 2000 4 24 329 55 77 66 34 7885.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
4/25/2000 2000 4 25 330 51 82 66.5 34.5 7920
4/26/2000 2000 4 26 331 53 87 70 38 7958
4/27/2000 2000 4 27 332 56 91 73.5 41.5 7999.5
4/28/2000 2000 4 28 333 59 86 72.5 40.5 8040
4/29/2000 2000 4 29 334 55 74 64.5 32.5 8072.5
4/30/2000 2000 4 30 335 51 73 62 30 8102.5
5/1/2000 2000 5 1 336 50 81 65.5 33.5 8136
5/2/2000 2000 5 2 337 55 89 72 40 8176
5/3/2000 2000 5 3 338 57 92 74.5 42.5 8218.5
5/4/2000 2000 5 4 339 61 91 76 44 8262.5
5/5/2000 2000 5 5 340 65 89 77 45 8307.5
5/6/2000 2000 5 6 341 62 87 74.5 42.5 8350
5/7/2000 2000 5 7 342 67 81 74 42 8392
5/8/2000 2000 5 8 343 62 79 70.5 38.5 8430.5
5/9/2000 2000 5 9 344 53 85 69 37 8467.5
5/10/2000 2000 5 10 345 67 89 78 46 8513.5
5/11/2000 2000 5 11 346 50 73 61.5 29.5 8543
5/12/2000 2000 5 12 347 44 65 54.5 22.5 8565.5
5/13/2000 2000 5 13 348 45 76 60.5 28.5 8594
5/14/2000 2000 5 14 349 50 82 66 34 8628
5/15/2000 2000 5 15 350 56 87 71.5 39.5 8667.5
5/16/2000 2000 5 16 351 54 73 63.5 31.5 8699
5/17/2000 2000 5 17 352 53 69 61 29 8728
5/18/2000 2000 5 18 353 47 72 59.5 27.5 8755.5
5/19/2000 2000 5 19 354 55 79 67 35 8790.5
5/20/2000 2000 5 20 355 59 84 71.5 39.5 8830
5/21/2000 2000 5 21 356 59 87 73 41 8871
5/22/2000 2000 5 22 357 63 96 79.5 47.5 8918.5
5/23/2000 2000 5 23 358 68 99 83.5 51.5 8970
5/24/2000 2000 5 24 359 72 96 84 52 9022
5/25/2000 2000 5 25 360 65 91 78 46 9068
5/26/2000 2000 5 26 361 60 86 73 41 9109
5/27/2000 2000 5 27 362 63 93 78 46 9155
5/28/2000 2000 5 28 363 68 101 84.5 52.5 9207.5
5/29/2000 2000 5 29 364 70 101 85.5 53.5 9261
5/30/2000 2000 5 30 365 74 99 86.5 54.5 9315.5
5/31/2000 2000 5 31 366 70 97 83.5 51.5 9367
6/1/2000 2000 6 1 1 64 94 79 47 47
6/2/2000 2000 6 2 2 66 94 80 48 95
6/3/2000 2000 6 3 3 66 95 80.5 48.5 143.5
6/4/2000 2000 6 4 4 69 98 83.5 51.5 195
6/5/2000 2000 6 5 5 69 99 84 52 247
6/6/2000 2000 6 6 6 65 99 82 50 297
6/7/2000 2000 6 7 7 68 99 83.5 51.5 348.5
6/8/2000 2000 6 8 8 74 91 82.5 50.5 399
6/9/2000 2000 6 9 9 66 84 75 43 442
6/10/2000 2000 6 10 10 59 87 73 41 483
6/11/2000 2000 6 11 11 62 91 76.5 44.5 527.5
6/12/2000 2000 6 12 12 62 93 77.5 45.5 573
6/13/2000 2000 6 13 13 66 95 80.5 48.5 621.5
6/14/2000 2000 6 14 14 71 93 82 50 671.5
6/15/2000 2000 6 15 15 68 101 84.5 52.5 724
6/16/2000 2000 6 16 16 74 97 85.5 53.5 777.5
6/17/2000 2000 6 17 17 68 85 76.5 44.5 822
6/18/2000 2000 6 18 18 68 85 76.5 44.5 866.5
6/19/2000 2000 6 19 19 62 92 77 45 911.5
6/20/2000 2000 6 20 20 70 93 81.5 49.5 961
6/21/2000 2000 6 21 21 65 93 79 47 1008
6/22/2000 2000 6 22 22 73 92 82.5 50.5 1058.5
6/23/2000 2000 6 23 23 66 86 76 44 1102.5
6/24/2000 2000 6 24 24 64 91 77.5 45.5 1148
6/25/2000 2000 6 25 25 67 95 81 49 1197
6/26/2000 2000 6 26 26 73 89 81 49 1246
6/27/2000 2000 6 27 27 68 96 82 50 1296
6/28/2000 2000 6 28 28 70 97 83.5 51.5 1347.5
6/29/2000 2000 6 29 29 73 95 84 52 1399.5
6/30/2000 2000 6 30 30 70 94 82 50 1449.5
7/1/2000 2000 7 1 31 71 96 83.5 51.5 1501
7/2/2000 2000 7 2 32 70 95 82.5 50.5 1551.5
7/3/2000 2000 7 3 33 71 93 82 50 1601.5
7/4/2000 2000 7 4 34 67 93 80 48 1649.5
7/5/2000 2000 7 5 35 62 94 78 46 1695.5
7/6/2000 2000 7 6 36 65 96 80.5 48.5 1744
7/7/2000 2000 7 7 37 68 94 81 49 1793
7/8/2000 2000 7 8 38 68 85 76.5 44.5 1837.5
7/9/2000 2000 7 9 39 66 85 75.5 43.5 1881
7/10/2000 2000 7 10 40 63 94 78.5 46.5 1927.5
7/11/2000 2000 7 11 41 67 94 80.5 48.5 1976
7/12/2000 2000 7 12 42 71 98 84.5 52.5 2028.5
7/13/2000 2000 7 13 43 75 101 88 56 2084.5
7/14/2000 2000 7 14 44 75 99 87 55 2139.5
7/15/2000 2000 7 15 45 81 96 88.5 56.5 2196
7/16/2000 2000 7 16 46 73 96 84.5 52.5 2248.5
7/17/2000 2000 7 17 47 71 98 84.5 52.5 2301
7/18/2000 2000 7 18 48 69 99 84 52 2353
7/19/2000 2000 7 19 49 68 101 84.5 52.5 2405.5
7/20/2000 2000 7 20 50 70 102 86 54 2459.5
7/21/2000 2000 7 21 51 72 103 87.5 55.5 2515
7/22/2000 2000 7 22 52 73 103 88 56 2571
7/23/2000 2000 7 23 53 76 101 88.5 56.5 2627.5
7/24/2000 2000 7 24 54 75 99 87 55 2682.5
7/25/2000 2000 7 25 55 76 102 89 57 2739.5
7/26/2000 2000 7 26 56 73 103 88 56 2795.5
7/27/2000 2000 7 27 57 75 100 87.5 55.5 2851
7/28/2000 2000 7 28 58 73 102 87.5 55.5 2906.5
7/29/2000 2000 7 29 59 74 104 89 57 2963.5
7/30/2000 2000 7 30 60 74 99 86.5 54.5 3018
7/31/2000 2000 7 31 61 75 98 86.5 54.5 3072.5
8/1/2000 2000 8 1 62 73 102 87.5 55.5 3128
8/2/2000 2000 8 2 63 82 102 92 60 3188
8/3/2000 2000 8 3 64 79 102 90.5 58.5 3246.5
8/4/2000 2000 8 4 65 73 96 84.5 52.5 3299
8/5/2000 2000 8 5 66 72 100 86 54 3353
8/6/2000 2000 8 6 67 73 101 87 55 3408
8/7/2000 2000 8 7 68 77 98 87.5 55.5 3463.5
8/8/2000 2000 8 8 69 73 99 86 54 3517.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
8/9/2000 2000 8 9 70 74 99 86.5 54.5 3572
8/10/2000 2000 8 10 71 77 97 87 55 3627
8/11/2000 2000 8 11 72 72 99 85.5 53.5 3680.5
8/12/2000 2000 8 12 73 74 98 86 54 3734.5
8/13/2000 2000 8 13 74 75 97 86 54 3788.5
8/14/2000 2000 8 14 75 76 97 86.5 54.5 3843
8/15/2000 2000 8 15 76 71 98 84.5 52.5 3895.5
8/16/2000 2000 8 16 77 70 94 82 50 3945.5
8/17/2000 2000 8 17 78 69 92 80.5 48.5 3994
8/18/2000 2000 8 18 79 72 85 78.5 46.5 4040.5
8/19/2000 2000 8 19 80 67 91 79 47 4087.5
8/20/2000 2000 8 20 81 72 94 83 51 4138.5
8/21/2000 2000 8 21 82 67 92 79.5 47.5 4186
8/22/2000 2000 8 22 83 70 92 81 49 4235
8/23/2000 2000 8 23 84 73 90 81.5 49.5 4284.5
8/24/2000 2000 8 24 85 72 94 83 51 4335.5
8/25/2000 2000 8 25 86 69 91 80 48 4383.5
8/26/2000 2000 8 26 87 67 91 79 47 4430.5
8/27/2000 2000 8 27 88 70 89 79.5 47.5 4478
8/28/2000 2000 8 28 89 66 89 77.5 45.5 4523.5
8/29/2000 2000 8 29 90 65 81 73 41 4564.5
8/30/2000 2000 8 30 91 64 79 71.5 39.5 4604
8/31/2000 2000 8 31 92 60 82 71 39 4643
9/1/2000 2000 9 1 93 63 82 72.5 40.5 4683.5
9/2/2000 2000 9 2 94 56 86 71 39 4722.5
9/3/2000 2000 9 3 95 62 87 74.5 42.5 4765
9/4/2000 2000 9 4 96 62 93 77.5 45.5 4810.5
9/5/2000 2000 9 5 97 68 93 80.5 48.5 4859
9/6/2000 2000 9 6 98 66 84 75 43 4902
9/7/2000 2000 9 7 99 62 87 74.5 42.5 4944.5
9/8/2000 2000 9 8 100 61 85 73 41 4985.5
9/9/2000 2000 9 9 101 60 90 75 43 5028.5
9/10/2000 2000 9 10 102 62 90 76 44 5072.5
9/11/2000 2000 9 11 103 64 90 77 45 5117.5
9/12/2000 2000 9 12 104 63 91 77 45 5162.5
9/13/2000 2000 9 13 105 62 93 77.5 45.5 5208
9/14/2000 2000 9 14 106 65 96 80.5 48.5 5256.5
9/15/2000 2000 9 15 107 65 96 80.5 48.5 5305
9/16/2000 2000 9 16 108 67 96 81.5 49.5 5354.5
9/17/2000 2000 9 17 109 69 96 82.5 50.5 5405
9/18/2000 2000 9 18 110 67 86 76.5 44.5 5449.5
9/19/2000 2000 9 19 111 65 90 77.5 45.5 5495
9/20/2000 2000 9 20 112 65 87 76 44 5539
9/21/2000 2000 9 21 113 65 89 77 45 5584
9/22/2000 2000 9 22 114 69 87 78 46 5630
9/23/2000 2000 9 23 115 50 71 60.5 28.5 5658.5
9/24/2000 2000 9 24 116 42 65 53.5 21.5 5680
9/25/2000 2000 9 25 117 45 70 57.5 25.5 5705.5
9/26/2000 2000 9 26 118 50 76 63 31 5736.5
9/27/2000 2000 9 27 119 58 78 68 36 5772.5
9/28/2000 2000 9 28 120 60 87 73.5 41.5 5814
9/29/2000 2000 9 29 121 62 86 74 42 5856
9/30/2000 2000 9 30 122 59 86 72.5 40.5 5896.5
10/1/2000 2000 10 1 123 62 90 76 44 5940.5
10/2/2000 2000 10 2 124 63 90 76.5 44.5 5985
10/3/2000 2000 10 3 125 66 87 76.5 44.5 6029.5
10/4/2000 2000 10 4 126 64 80 72 40 6069.5
10/5/2000 2000 10 5 127 56 81 68.5 36.5 6106
10/6/2000 2000 10 6 128 58 83 70.5 38.5 6144.5
10/7/2000 2000 10 7 129 57 83 70 38 6182.5
10/8/2000 2000 10 8 130 63 76 69.5 37.5 6220
10/9/2000 2000 10 9 131 57 72 64.5 32.5 6252.5
10/10/2000 2000 10 10 132 57 71 64 32 6284.5
10/11/2000 2000 10 11 133 47 63 55 23 6307.5
10/12/2000 2000 10 12 134 42 61 51.5 19.5 6327
10/13/2000 2000 10 13 135 42 64 53 21 6348
10/14/2000 2000 10 14 136 43 67 55 23 6371
10/15/2000 2000 10 15 137 44 68 56 24 6395
10/16/2000 2000 10 16 138 46 71 58.5 26.5 6421.5
10/17/2000 2000 10 17 139 46 72 59 27 6448.5
10/18/2000 2000 10 18 140 47 71 59 27 6475.5
10/19/2000 2000 10 19 141 51 75 63 31 6506.5
10/20/2000 2000 10 20 142 50 75 62.5 30.5 6537
10/21/2000 2000 10 21 143 50 71 60.5 28.5 6565.5
10/22/2000 2000 10 22 144 47 59 53 21 6586.5
10/23/2000 2000 10 23 145 45 55 50 18 6604.5
10/24/2000 2000 10 24 146 45 56 50.5 18.5 6623
10/25/2000 2000 10 25 147 44 57 50.5 18.5 6641.5
10/26/2000 2000 10 26 148 45 62 53.5 21.5 6663
10/27/2000 2000 10 27 149 42 56 49 17 6680
10/28/2000 2000 10 28 150 44 56 50 18 6698
10/29/2000 2000 10 29 151 43 58 50.5 18.5 6716.5
10/30/2000 2000 10 30 152 40 57 48.5 16.5 6733
10/31/2000 2000 10 31 153 38 49 43.5 11.5 6744.5
11/1/2000 2000 11 1 154 38 54 46 14 6758.5
11/2/2000 2000 11 2 155 36 52 44 12 6770.5
11/3/2000 2000 11 3 156 42 51 46.5 14.5 6785
11/4/2000 2000 11 4 157 43 56 49.5 17.5 6802.5
11/5/2000 2000 11 5 158 42 54 48 16 6818.5
11/6/2000 2000 11 6 159 39 48 43.5 11.5 6830
11/7/2000 2000 11 7 160 36 45 40.5 8.5 6838.5
11/8/2000 2000 11 8 161 30 47 38.5 6.5 6845
11/9/2000 2000 11 9 162 33 50 41.5 9.5 6854.5
11/10/2000 2000 11 10 163 36 45 40.5 8.5 6863
11/11/2000 2000 11 11 164 33 41 37 5 6868
11/12/2000 2000 11 12 165 30 41 35.5 3.5 6871.5
11/13/2000 2000 11 13 166 26 41 33.5 1.5 6873
11/14/2000 2000 11 14 167 27 43 35 3 6876
11/15/2000 2000 11 15 168 30 45 37.5 5.5 6881.5
11/16/2000 2000 11 16 169 29 42 35.5 3.5 6885
11/17/2000 2000 11 17 170 27 42 34.5 2.5 6887.5
11/18/2000 2000 11 18 171 28 41 34.5 2.5 6890
11/19/2000 2000 11 19 172 25 44 34.5 2.5 6892.5
11/20/2000 2000 11 20 173 28 47 37.5 5.5 6898
11/21/2000 2000 11 21 174 30 45 37.5 5.5 6903.5
11/22/2000 2000 11 22 175 31 45 38 6 6909.5
11/23/2000 2000 11 23 176 35 54 44.5 12.5 6922
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
11/24/2000 2000 11 24 177 33 49 41 9 6931
11/25/2000 2000 11 25 178 31 48 39.5 7.5 6938.5
11/26/2000 2000 11 26 179 30 46 38 6 6944.5
11/27/2000 2000 11 27 180 32 52 42 10 6954.5
11/28/2000 2000 11 28 181 34 54 44 12 6966.5
11/29/2000 2000 11 29 182 34 53 43.5 11.5 6978
11/30/2000 2000 11 30 183 36 56 46 14 6992
12/1/2000 2000 12 1 184 33 50 41.5 9.5 7001.5
12/2/2000 2000 12 2 185 36 49 42.5 10.5 7012
12/3/2000 2000 12 3 186 31 49 40 8 7020
12/4/2000 2000 12 4 187 31 48 39.5 7.5 7027.5
12/5/2000 2000 12 5 188 33 48 40.5 8.5 7036
12/6/2000 2000 12 6 189 31 50 40.5 8.5 7044.5
12/7/2000 2000 12 7 190 34 50 42 10 7054.5
12/8/2000 2000 12 8 191 39 49 44 12 7066.5
12/9/2000 2000 12 9 192 35 50 42.5 10.5 7077
12/10/2000 2000 12 10 193 37 49 43 11 7088
12/11/2000 2000 12 11 194 39 48 43.5 11.5 7099.5
12/12/2000 2000 12 12 195 33 43 38 6 7105.5
12/13/2000 2000 12 13 196 31 42 36.5 4.5 7110
12/14/2000 2000 12 14 197 34 44 39 7 7117
12/15/2000 2000 12 15 198 32 53 42.5 10.5 7127.5
12/16/2000 2000 12 16 199 33 48 40.5 8.5 7136
12/17/2000 2000 12 17 200 29 47 38 6 7142
12/18/2000 2000 12 18 201 23 40 31.5 -0.5 7141.5
12/19/2000 2000 12 19 202 23 36 29.5 -2.5 7139
12/20/2000 2000 12 20 203 23 41 32 0 7139
12/21/2000 2000 12 21 204 27 46 36.5 4.5 7143.5
12/22/2000 2000 12 22 205 28 47 37.5 5.5 7149
12/23/2000 2000 12 23 206 30 46 38 6 7155
12/24/2000 2000 12 24 207 31 44 37.5 5.5 7160.5
12/25/2000 2000 12 25 208 34 46 40 8 7168.5
12/26/2000 2000 12 26 209 29 46 37.5 5.5 7174
12/27/2000 2000 12 27 210 27 44 35.5 3.5 7177.5
12/28/2000 2000 12 28 211 28 45 36.5 4.5 7182
12/29/2000 2000 12 29 212 28 46 37 5 7187
12/30/2000 2000 12 30 213 28 45 36.5 4.5 7191.5
12/31/2000 2000 12 31 214 28 47 37.5 5.5 7197
1/1/2001 2001 1 1 215 28 48 38 6 7203
1/2/2001 2001 1 2 216 28 49 38.5 6.5 7209.5
1/3/2001 2001 1 3 217 27 47 37 5 7214.5
1/4/2001 2001 1 4 218 28 47 37.5 5.5 7220
1/5/2001 2001 1 5 219 27 45 36 4 7224
1/6/2001 2001 1 6 220 30 45 37.5 5.5 7229.5
1/7/2001 2001 1 7 221 28 49 38.5 6.5 7236
1/8/2001 2001 1 8 222 27 45 36 4 7240
1/9/2001 2001 1 9 223 32 41 36.5 4.5 7244.5
1/10/2001 2001 1 10 224 33 45 39 7 7251.5
1/11/2001 2001 1 11 225 36 47 41.5 9.5 7261
1/12/2001 2001 1 12 226 32 38 35 3 7264
1/13/2001 2001 1 13 227 30 42 36 4 7268
1/14/2001 2001 1 14 228 28 40 34 2 7270
1/15/2001 2001 1 15 229 30 37 33.5 1.5 7271.5
1/16/2001 2001 1 16 230 29 36 32.5 0.5 7272
1/17/2001 2001 1 17 231 26 37 31.5 -0.5 7271.5
1/18/2001 2001 1 18 232 23 38 30.5 -1.5 7270
1/19/2001 2001 1 19 233 24 39 31.5 -0.5 7269.5
1/20/2001 2001 1 20 234 29 45 37 5 7274.5
1/21/2001 2001 1 21 235 26 42 34 2 7276.5
1/22/2001 2001 1 22 236 30 42 36 4 7280.5
1/23/2001 2001 1 23 237 33 44 38.5 6.5 7287
1/24/2001 2001 1 24 238 35 43 39 7 7294
1/25/2001 2001 1 25 239 31 46 38.5 6.5 7300.5
1/26/2001 2001 1 26 240 29 39 34 2 7302.5
1/27/2001 2001 1 27 241 33 39 36 4 7306.5
1/28/2001 2001 1 28 242 31 39 35 3 7309.5
1/29/2001 2001 1 29 243 28 44 36 4 7313.5
1/30/2001 2001 1 30 244 29 41 35 3 7316.5
1/31/2001 2001 1 31 245 24 36 30 -2 7314.5
2/1/2001 2001 2 1 246 23 40 31.5 -0.5 7314
2/2/2001 2001 2 2 247 25 42 33.5 1.5 7315.5
2/3/2001 2001 2 3 248 29 46 37.5 5.5 7321
2/4/2001 2001 2 4 249 31 49 40 8 7329
2/5/2001 2001 2 5 250 32 52 42 10 7339
2/6/2001 2001 2 6 251 33 60 46.5 14.5 7353.5
2/7/2001 2001 2 7 252 40 57 48.5 16.5 7370
2/8/2001 2001 2 8 253 28 40 34 2 7372
2/9/2001 2001 2 9 254 17 39 28 -4 7368
2/10/2001 2001 2 10 255 24 43 33.5 1.5 7369.5
2/11/2001 2001 2 11 256 30 46 38 6 7375.5
2/12/2001 2001 2 12 257 30 52 41 9 7384.5
2/13/2001 2001 2 13 258 35 54 44.5 12.5 7397
2/14/2001 2001 2 14 259 34 44 39 7 7404
2/15/2001 2001 2 15 260 27 47 37 5 7409
2/16/2001 2001 2 16 261 30 48 39 7 7416
2/17/2001 2001 2 17 262 29 50 39.5 7.5 7423.5
2/18/2001 2001 2 18 263 41 52 46.5 14.5 7438
2/19/2001 2001 2 19 264 40 60 50 18 7456
2/20/2001 2001 2 20 265 39 58 48.5 16.5 7472.5
2/21/2001 2001 2 21 266 38 58 48 16 7488.5
2/22/2001 2001 2 22 267 42 57 49.5 17.5 7506
2/23/2001 2001 2 23 268 37 48 42.5 10.5 7516.5
2/24/2001 2001 2 24 269 31 51 41 9 7525.5
2/25/2001 2001 2 25 270 38 50 44 12 7537.5
2/26/2001 2001 2 26 271 37 43 40 8 7545.5
2/27/2001 2001 2 27 272 39 49 44 12 7557.5
2/28/2001 2001 2 28 273 37 47 42 10 7567.5
3/1/2001 2001 3 1 274 34 48 41 9 7576.5
3/2/2001 2001 3 2 275 32 50 41 9 7585.5
3/3/2001 2001 3 3 276 36 53 44.5 12.5 7598
3/4/2001 2001 3 4 277 35 54 44.5 12.5 7610.5
3/5/2001 2001 3 5 278 44 58 51 19 7629.5
3/6/2001 2001 3 6 279 43 59 51 19 7648.5
3/7/2001 2001 3 7 280 44 53 48.5 16.5 7665
3/8/2001 2001 3 8 281 40 60 50 18 7683
3/9/2001 2001 3 9 282 44 59 51.5 19.5 7702.5
3/10/2001 2001 3 10 283 36 47 41.5 9.5 7712
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
3/11/2001 2001 3 11 284 36 49 42.5 10.5 7722.5
3/12/2001 2001 3 12 285 33 55 44 12 7734.5
3/13/2001 2001 3 13 286 36 56 46 14 7748.5
3/14/2001 2001 3 14 287 38 64 51 19 7767.5
3/15/2001 2001 3 15 288 32 52 42 10 7777.5
3/16/2001 2001 3 16 289 37 62 49.5 17.5 7795
3/17/2001 2001 3 17 290 35 57 46 14 7809
3/18/2001 2001 3 18 291 39 63 51 19 7828
3/19/2001 2001 3 19 292 41 64 52.5 20.5 7848.5
3/20/2001 2001 3 20 293 43 68 55.5 23.5 7872
3/21/2001 2001 3 21 294 48 73 60.5 28.5 7900.5
3/22/2001 2001 3 22 295 52 73 62.5 30.5 7931
3/23/2001 2001 3 23 296 47 71 59 27 7958
3/24/2001 2001 3 24 297 47 71 59 27 7985
3/25/2001 2001 3 25 298 46 72 59 27 8012
3/26/2001 2001 3 26 299 50 71 60.5 28.5 8040.5
3/28/2001 2001 3 28 301 46 69 57.5 25.5 8066
3/29/2001 2001 3 29 302 50 68 59 27 8093
3/30/2001 2001 3 30 303 42 69 55.5 23.5 8116.5
3/31/2001 2001 3 31 304 44 73 58.5 26.5 8143
4/1/2001 2001 4 1 305 50 76 63 31 8174
4/2/2001 2001 4 2 306 56 75 65.5 33.5 8207.5
4/3/2001 2001 4 3 307 50 68 59 27 8234.5
4/4/2001 2001 4 4 308 49 70 59.5 27.5 8262
4/5/2001 2001 4 5 309 44 66 55 23 8285
4/6/2001 2001 4 6 310 41 57 49 17 8302
4/7/2001 2001 4 7 311 46 59 52.5 20.5 8322.5
4/8/2001 2001 4 8 312 38 53 45.5 13.5 8336
4/9/2001 2001 4 9 313 35 57 46 14 8350
4/10/2001 2001 4 10 314 38 48 43 11 8361
4/11/2001 2001 4 11 315 35 55 45 13 8374
4/12/2001 2001 4 12 316 40 55 47.5 15.5 8389.5
4/13/2001 2001 4 13 317 36 61 48.5 16.5 8406
4/14/2001 2001 4 14 318 41 71 56 24 8430
4/15/2001 2001 4 15 319 45 72 58.5 26.5 8456.5
4/16/2001 2001 4 16 320 46 77 61.5 29.5 8486
4/17/2001 2001 4 17 321 51 82 66.5 34.5 8520.5
4/18/2001 2001 4 18 322 52 84 68 36 8556.5
4/19/2001 2001 4 19 323 64 79 71.5 39.5 8596
4/20/2001 2001 4 20 324 52 65 58.5 26.5 8622.5
4/21/2001 2001 4 21 325 41 57 49 17 8639.5
4/22/2001 2001 4 22 326 42 63 52.5 20.5 8660
4/23/2001 2001 4 23 327 42 66 54 22 8682
4/24/2001 2001 4 24 328 45 74 59.5 27.5 8709.5
4/25/2001 2001 4 25 329 50 81 65.5 33.5 8743
4/26/2001 2001 4 26 330 55 85 70 38 8781
4/27/2001 2001 4 27 331 56 78 67 35 8816
4/28/2001 2001 4 28 332 55 82 68.5 36.5 8852.5
4/29/2001 2001 4 29 333 54 80 67 35 8887.5
4/30/2001 2001 4 30 334 54 84 69 37 8924.5
5/1/2001 2001 5 1 335 56 89 72.5 40.5 8965
5/2/2001 2001 5 2 336 41 73 57 25 8990
5/3/2001 2001 5 3 337 40 58 49 17 9007
5/4/2001 2001 5 4 338 41 59 50 18 9025
5/5/2001 2001 5 5 339 39 75 57 25 9050
5/6/2001 2001 5 6 340 50 82 66 34 9084
5/7/2001 2001 5 7 341 53 81 67 35 9119
5/8/2001 2001 5 8 342 55 85 70 38 9157
5/9/2001 2001 5 9 343 58 89 73.5 41.5 9198.5
5/10/2001 2001 5 10 344 61 91 76 44 9242.5
5/11/2001 2001 5 11 345 60 88 74 42 9284.5
5/12/2001 2001 5 12 346 62 89 75.5 43.5 9328
5/13/2001 2001 5 13 347 61 76 68.5 36.5 9364.5
5/14/2001 2001 5 14 348 55 85 70 38 9402.5
5/15/2001 2001 5 15 349 57 87 72 40 9442.5
5/16/2001 2001 5 16 350 63 91 77 45 9487.5
5/17/2001 2001 5 17 351 65 85 75 43 9530.5
5/18/2001 2001 5 18 352 60 86 73 41 9571.5
5/19/2001 2001 5 19 353 59 79 69 37 9608.5
5/20/2001 2001 5 20 354 54 88 71 39 9647.5
5/21/2001 2001 5 21 355 60 74 67 35 9682.5
5/22/2001 2001 5 22 356 53 84 68.5 36.5 9719
5/23/2001 2001 5 23 357 58 89 73.5 41.5 9760.5
5/24/2001 2001 5 24 358 60 93 76.5 44.5 9805
5/25/2001 2001 5 25 359 65 98 81.5 49.5 9854.5
5/26/2001 2001 5 26 360 66 94 80 48 9902.5
5/27/2001 2001 5 27 361 69 92 80.5 48.5 9951
5/28/2001 2001 5 28 362 67 87 77 45 9996
5/29/2001 2001 5 29 363 66 90 78 46 10042
5/30/2001 2001 5 30 364 67 95 81 49 10091
5/31/2001 2001 5 31 365 60 91 75.5 43.5 10134.5
6/1/2001 2001 6 1 1 64 95 79.5 47.5 47.5
6/2/2001 2001 6 2 2 72 93 82.5 50.5 98
6/3/2001 2001 6 3 3 67 87 77 45 143
6/5/2001 2001 6 5 5 56 90 73 41 184
6/6/2001 2001 6 6 6 62 95 78.5 46.5 230.5
6/7/2001 2001 6 7 7 67 96 81.5 49.5 280
6/8/2001 2001 6 8 8 68 99 83.5 51.5 331.5
6/9/2001 2001 6 9 9 68 98 83 51 382.5
6/10/2001 2001 6 10 10 65 97 81 49 431.5
6/11/2001 2001 6 11 11 72 97 84.5 52.5 484
6/12/2001 2001 6 12 12 64 91 77.5 45.5 529.5
6/13/2001 2001 6 13 13 53 72 62.5 30.5 560
6/14/2001 2001 6 14 14 49 76 62.5 30.5 590.5
6/15/2001 2001 6 15 15 54 90 72 40 630.5
6/16/2001 2001 6 16 16 63 96 79.5 47.5 678
6/17/2001 2001 6 17 17 65 99 82 50 728
6/18/2001 2001 6 18 18 66 97 81.5 49.5 777.5
6/19/2001 2001 6 19 19 66 98 82 50 827.5
6/20/2001 2001 6 20 20 67 99 83 51 878.5
6/21/2001 2001 6 21 21 70 100 85 53 931.5
6/22/2001 2001 6 22 22 71 100 85.5 53.5 985
6/23/2001 2001 6 23 23 74 93 83.5 51.5 1036.5
6/24/2001 2001 6 24 24 67 93 80 48 1084.5
6/25/2001 2001 6 25 25 68 96 82 50 1134.5
6/26/2001 2001 6 26 26 60 80 70 38 1172.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
6/27/2001 2001 6 27 27 63 92 77.5 45.5 1218
6/28/2001 2001 6 28 28 68 96 82 50 1268
6/29/2001 2001 6 29 29 66 101 83.5 51.5 1319.5
6/30/2001 2001 6 30 30 71 102 86.5 54.5 1374
7/1/2001 2001 7 1 31 82 102 92 60 1434
7/2/2001 2001 7 2 32 77 103 90 58 1492
7/3/2001 2001 7 3 33 76 102 89 57 1549
7/4/2001 2001 7 4 34 79 101 90 58 1607
7/5/2001 2001 7 5 35 74 102 88 56 1663
7/6/2001 2001 7 6 36 69 95 82 50 1713
7/7/2001 2001 7 7 37 68 89 78.5 46.5 1759.5
7/8/2001 2001 7 8 38 68 92 80 48 1807.5
7/9/2001 2001 7 9 39 66 90 78 46 1853.5
7/10/2001 2001 7 10 40 67 82 74.5 42.5 1896
7/11/2001 2001 7 11 41 69 93 81 49 1945
7/12/2001 2001 7 12 42 75 94 84.5 52.5 1997.5
7/13/2001 2001 7 13 43 73 91 82 50 2047.5
7/14/2001 2001 7 14 44 67 79 73 41 2088.5
7/15/2001 2001 7 15 45 65 92 78.5 46.5 2135
7/16/2001 2001 7 16 46 66 93 79.5 47.5 2182.5
7/17/2001 2001 7 17 47 66 92 79 47 2229.5
7/18/2001 2001 7 18 48 68 93 80.5 48.5 2278
7/19/2001 2001 7 19 49 69 93 81 49 2327
7/20/2001 2001 7 20 50 69 95 82 50 2377
7/21/2001 2001 7 21 51 69 95 82 50 2427
7/22/2001 2001 7 22 52 69 95 82 50 2477
7/23/2001 2001 7 23 53 71 96 83.5 51.5 2528.5
7/24/2001 2001 7 24 54 72 95 83.5 51.5 2580
7/25/2001 2001 7 25 55 67 84 75.5 43.5 2623.5
7/26/2001 2001 7 26 56 64 88 76 44 2667.5
7/27/2001 2001 7 27 57 64 94 79 47 2714.5
7/28/2001 2001 7 28 58 69 100 84.5 52.5 2767
7/29/2001 2001 7 29 59 73 101 87 55 2822
7/30/2001 2001 7 30 60 74 90 82 50 2872
7/31/2001 2001 7 31 61 72 94 83 51 2923
8/1/2001 2001 8 1 62 71 95 83 51 2974
8/2/2001 2001 8 2 63 70 94 82 50 3024
8/3/2001 2001 8 3 64 74 89 81.5 49.5 3073.5
8/4/2001 2001 8 4 65 71 91 81 49 3122.5
8/5/2001 2001 8 5 66 69 97 83 51 3173.5
8/6/2001 2001 8 6 67 74 100 87 55 3228.5
8/7/2001 2001 8 7 68 71 99 85 53 3281.5
8/8/2001 2001 8 8 69 70 90 80 48 3329.5
8/9/2001 2001 8 9 70 71 93 82 50 3379.5
8/10/2001 2001 8 10 71 73 92 82.5 50.5 3430
8/11/2001 2001 8 11 72 67 94 80.5 48.5 3478.5
8/12/2001 2001 8 12 73 71 95 83 51 3529.5
8/13/2001 2001 8 13 74 64 76 70 38 3567.5
8/14/2001 2001 8 14 75 64 89 76.5 44.5 3612
8/15/2001 2001 8 15 76 68 91 79.5 47.5 3659.5
8/16/2001 2001 8 16 77 67 95 81 49 3708.5
8/17/2001 2001 8 17 78 66 96 81 49 3757.5
8/18/2001 2001 8 18 79 70 100 85 53 3810.5
8/19/2001 2001 8 19 80 70 96 83 51 3861.5
8/20/2001 2001 8 20 81 66 78 72 40 3901.5
8/21/2001 2001 8 21 82 61 90 75.5 43.5 3945
8/22/2001 2001 8 22 83 60 85 72.5 40.5 3985.5
8/23/2001 2001 8 23 84 63 91 77 45 4030.5
8/24/2001 2001 8 24 85 64 95 79.5 47.5 4078
8/25/2001 2001 8 25 86 67 96 81.5 49.5 4127.5
8/26/2001 2001 8 26 87 67 99 83 51 4178.5
8/27/2001 2001 8 27 88 69 100 84.5 52.5 4231
8/28/2001 2001 8 28 89 74 97 85.5 53.5 4284.5
8/29/2001 2001 8 29 90 73 94 83.5 51.5 4336
8/30/2001 2001 8 30 91 69 92 80.5 48.5 4384.5
8/31/2001 2001 8 31 92 68 91 79.5 47.5 4432
9/1/2001 2001 9 1 93 66 91 78.5 46.5 4478.5
9/2/2001 2001 9 2 94 63 93 78 46 4524.5
9/3/2001 2001 9 3 95 68 94 81 49 4573.5
9/4/2001 2001 9 4 96 70 96 83 51 4624.5
9/5/2001 2001 9 5 97 68 94 81 49 4673.5
9/6/2001 2001 9 6 98 69 90 79.5 47.5 4721
9/7/2001 2001 9 7 99 60 84 72 40 4761
9/8/2001 2001 9 8 100 59 76 67.5 35.5 4796.5
9/9/2001 2001 9 9 101 53 81 67 35 4831.5
9/10/2001 2001 9 10 102 56 88 72 40 4871.5
9/11/2001 2001 9 11 103 64 92 78 46 4917.5
9/12/2001 2001 9 12 104 68 91 79.5 47.5 4965
9/13/2001 2001 9 13 105 71 84 77.5 45.5 5010.5
9/14/2001 2001 9 14 106 64 86 75 43 5053.5
9/15/2001 2001 9 15 107 64 90 77 45 5098.5
9/16/2001 2001 9 16 108 65 83 74 42 5140.5
9/17/2001 2001 9 17 109 60 85 72.5 40.5 5181
9/18/2001 2001 9 18 110 61 86 73.5 41.5 5222.5
9/19/2001 2001 9 19 111 60 88 74 42 5264.5
9/20/2001 2001 9 20 112 61 89 75 43 5307.5
9/21/2001 2001 9 21 113 63 90 76.5 44.5 5352
9/22/2001 2001 9 22 114 62 91 76.5 44.5 5396.5
9/23/2001 2001 9 23 115 62 90 76 44 5440.5
9/24/2001 2001 9 24 116 62 90 76 44 5484.5
9/25/2001 2001 9 25 117 61 89 75 43 5527.5
9/26/2001 2001 9 26 118 63 89 76 44 5571.5
9/27/2001 2001 9 27 119 61 90 75.5 43.5 5615
9/28/2001 2001 9 28 120 62 91 76.5 44.5 5659.5
9/29/2001 2001 9 29 121 60 88 74 42 5701.5
9/30/2001 2001 9 30 122 60 86 73 41 5742.5
10/1/2001 2001 10 1 123 63 85 74 42 5784.5
10/2/2001 2001 10 2 124 63 85 74 42 5826.5
10/3/2001 2001 10 3 125 58 85 71.5 39.5 5866
10/4/2001 2001 10 4 126 60 87 73.5 41.5 5907.5
10/5/2001 2001 10 5 127 62 83 72.5 40.5 5948
10/6/2001 2001 10 6 128 60 80 70 38 5986
10/7/2001 2001 10 7 129 57 74 65.5 33.5 6019.5
10/8/2001 2001 10 8 130 54 76 65 33 6052.5
10/9/2001 2001 10 9 131 56 73 64.5 32.5 6085
10/10/2001 2001 10 10 132 46 65 55.5 23.5 6108.5
10/11/2001 2001 10 11 133 45 71 58 26 6134.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
10/12/2001 2001 10 12 134 47 61 54 22 6156.5
10/13/2001 2001 10 13 135 45 76 60.5 28.5 6185
10/14/2001 2001 10 14 136 50 79 64.5 32.5 6217.5
10/15/2001 2001 10 15 137 52 76 64 32 6249.5
10/16/2001 2001 10 16 138 47 73 60 28 6277.5
10/17/2001 2001 10 17 139 49 76 62.5 30.5 6308
10/18/2001 2001 10 18 140 52 79 65.5 33.5 6341.5
10/19/2001 2001 10 19 141 50 75 62.5 30.5 6372
10/20/2001 2001 10 20 142 48 77 62.5 30.5 6402.5
10/21/2001 2001 10 21 143 54 74 64 32 6434.5
10/22/2001 2001 10 22 144 54 77 65.5 33.5 6468
10/23/2001 2001 10 23 145 51 79 65 33 6501
10/24/2001 2001 10 24 146 48 64 56 24 6525
10/25/2001 2001 10 25 147 42 67 54.5 22.5 6547.5
10/26/2001 2001 10 26 148 43 70 56.5 24.5 6572
10/27/2001 2001 10 27 149 49 70 59.5 27.5 6599.5
10/28/2001 2001 10 28 150 51 76 63.5 31.5 6631
10/29/2001 2001 10 29 151 51 73 62 30 6661
10/30/2001 2001 10 30 152 52 66 59 27 6688
10/31/2001 2001 10 31 153 53 69 61 29 6717
11/1/2001 2001 11 1 154 44 67 55.5 23.5 6740.5
11/2/2001 2001 11 2 155 44 67 55.5 23.5 6764
11/3/2001 2001 11 3 156 43 68 55.5 23.5 6787.5
11/4/2001 2001 11 4 157 47 68 57.5 25.5 6813
11/5/2001 2001 11 5 158 55 69 62 30 6843
11/6/2001 2001 11 6 159 52 69 60.5 28.5 6871.5
11/7/2001 2001 11 7 160 50 70 60 28 6899.5
11/8/2001 2001 11 8 161 45 63 54 22 6921.5
11/9/2001 2001 11 9 162 44 57 50.5 18.5 6940
11/10/2001 2001 11 10 163 43 62 52.5 20.5 6960.5
11/11/2001 2001 11 11 164 44 64 54 22 6982.5
11/12/2001 2001 11 12 165 43 62 52.5 20.5 7003
11/13/2001 2001 11 13 166 47 61 54 22 7025
11/14/2001 2001 11 14 167 39 60 49.5 17.5 7042.5
11/15/2001 2001 11 15 168 38 61 49.5 17.5 7060
11/16/2001 2001 11 16 169 40 62 51 19 7079
11/17/2001 2001 11 17 170 40 62 51 19 7098
11/18/2001 2001 11 18 171 41 65 53 21 7119
11/19/2001 2001 11 19 172 40 60 50 18 7137
11/20/2001 2001 11 20 173 35 55 45 13 7150
11/21/2001 2001 11 21 174 36 55 45.5 13.5 7163.5
11/22/2001 2001 11 22 175 42 60 51 19 7182.5
11/23/2001 2001 11 23 176 39 52 45.5 13.5 7196
11/24/2001 2001 11 24 177 31 49 40 8 7204
11/25/2001 2001 11 25 178 32 47 39.5 7.5 7211.5
11/26/2001 2001 11 26 179 27 41 34 2 7213.5
11/27/2001 2001 11 27 180 29 40 34.5 2.5 7216
11/28/2001 2001 11 28 181 24 37 30.5 -1.5 7214.5
11/29/2001 2001 11 29 182 32 39 35.5 3.5 7218
11/30/2001 2001 11 30 183 31 43 37 5 7223
12/1/2001 2001 12 1 184 27 44 35.5 3.5 7226.5
12/2/2001 2001 12 2 185 37 47 42 10 7236.5
12/3/2001 2001 12 3 186 34 54 44 12 7248.5
12/4/2001 2001 12 4 187 35 47 41 9 7257.5
12/5/2001 2001 12 5 188 29 45 37 5 7262.5
12/6/2001 2001 12 6 189 30 46 38 6 7268.5
12/7/2001 2001 12 7 190 29 50 39.5 7.5 7276
12/8/2001 2001 12 8 191 26 44 35 3 7279
12/9/2001 2001 12 9 192 26 42 34 2 7281
12/10/2001 2001 12 10 193 30 42 36 4 7285
12/11/2001 2001 12 11 194 32 40 36 4 7289
12/12/2001 2001 12 12 195 28 40 34 2 7291
12/13/2001 2001 12 13 196 18 37 27.5 -4.5 7286.5
12/14/2001 2001 12 14 197 26 34 30 -2 7284.5
12/15/2001 2001 12 15 198 27 38 32.5 0.5 7285
12/16/2001 2001 12 16 199 17 35 26 -6 7279
12/17/2001 2001 12 17 200 24 39 31.5 -0.5 7278.5
12/18/2001 2001 12 18 201 24 42 33 1 7279.5
12/19/2001 2001 12 19 202 24 42 33 1 7280.5
12/20/2001 2001 12 20 203 26 41 33.5 1.5 7282
12/21/2001 2001 12 21 204 25 44 34.5 2.5 7284.5
12/22/2001 2001 12 22 205 24 44 34 2 7286.5
12/23/2001 2001 12 23 206 26 38 32 0 7286.5
12/24/2001 2001 12 24 207 23 43 33 1 7287.5
12/25/2001 2001 12 25 208 22 41 31.5 -0.5 7287
12/26/2001 2001 12 26 209 21 39 30 -2 7285
12/27/2001 2001 12 27 210 30 48 39 7 7292
12/28/2001 2001 12 28 211 33 48 40.5 8.5 7300.5
12/29/2001 2001 12 29 212 37 43 40 8 7308.5
12/30/2001 2001 12 30 213 35 47 41 9 7317.5
12/31/2001 2001 12 31 214 36 41 38.5 6.5 7324
1/1/2002 2002 1 1 215 34 44 39 7 7331
1/2/2002 2002 1 2 216 33 41 37 5 7336
1/3/2002 2002 1 3 217 28 37 32.5 0.5 7336.5
1/4/2002 2002 1 4 218 30 45 37.5 5.5 7342
1/5/2002 2002 1 5 219 27 42 34.5 2.5 7344.5
1/6/2002 2002 1 6 220 34 48 41 9 7353.5
1/7/2002 2002 1 7 221 32 48 40 8 7361.5
1/8/2002 2002 1 8 222 35 51 43 11 7372.5
1/9/2002 2002 1 9 223 35 46 40.5 8.5 7381
1/10/2002 2002 1 10 224 34 51 42.5 10.5 7391.5
1/11/2002 2002 1 11 225 28 47 37.5 5.5 7397
1/12/2002 2002 1 12 226 29 47 38 6 7403
1/13/2002 2002 1 13 227 28 51 39.5 7.5 7410.5
1/14/2002 2002 1 14 228 28 45 36.5 4.5 7415
1/15/2002 2002 1 15 229 30 51 40.5 8.5 7423.5
1/16/2002 2002 1 16 230 31 41 36 4 7427.5
1/17/2002 2002 1 17 231 24 41 32.5 0.5 7428
1/18/2002 2002 1 18 232 26 44 35 3 7431
1/19/2002 2002 1 19 233 17 35 26 -6 7425
1/20/2002 2002 1 20 234 22 43 32.5 0.5 7425.5
1/21/2002 2002 1 21 235 25 44 34.5 2.5 7428
1/22/2002 2002 1 22 236 27 53 40 8 7436
1/23/2002 2002 1 23 237 25 38 31.5 -0.5 7435.5
1/24/2002 2002 1 24 238 19 38 28.5 -3.5 7432
1/25/2002 2002 1 25 239 22 41 31.5 -0.5 7431.5
1/26/2002 2002 1 26 240 24 46 35 3 7434.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
1/27/2002 2002 1 27 241 28 48 38 6 7440.5
1/28/2002 2002 1 28 242 34 53 43.5 11.5 7452
1/29/2002 2002 1 29 243 27 40 33.5 1.5 7453.5
1/30/2002 2002 1 30 244 24 36 30 -2 7451.5
1/31/2002 2002 1 31 245 18 32 25 -7 7444.5
2/1/2002 2002 2 1 246 19 36 27.5 -4.5 7440
2/2/2002 2002 2 2 247 23 41 32 0 7440
2/3/2002 2002 2 3 248 23 43 33 1 7441
2/4/2002 2002 2 4 249 24 44 34 2 7443
2/5/2002 2002 2 5 250 24 44 34 2 7445
2/6/2002 2002 2 6 251 23 45 34 2 7447
2/7/2002 2002 2 7 252 24 47 35.5 3.5 7450.5
2/8/2002 2002 2 8 253 27 59 43 11 7461.5
2/9/2002 2002 2 9 254 30 46 38 6 7467.5
2/10/2002 2002 2 10 255 28 46 37 5 7472.5
2/11/2002 2002 2 11 256 24 47 35.5 3.5 7476
2/12/2002 2002 2 12 257 27 52 39.5 7.5 7483.5
2/13/2002 2002 2 13 258 28 48 38 6 7489.5
2/14/2002 2002 2 14 259 32 61 46.5 14.5 7504
2/15/2002 2002 2 15 260 30 49 39.5 7.5 7511.5
2/16/2002 2002 2 16 261 32 52 42 10 7521.5
2/17/2002 2002 2 17 262 34 52 43 11 7532.5
2/18/2002 2002 2 18 263 34 46 40 8 7540.5
2/19/2002 2002 2 19 264 30 51 40.5 8.5 7549
2/20/2002 2002 2 20 265 33 64 48.5 16.5 7565.5
2/21/2002 2002 2 21 266 37 56 46.5 14.5 7580
2/22/2002 2002 2 22 267 34 58 46 14 7594
2/23/2002 2002 2 23 268 37 58 47.5 15.5 7609.5
2/24/2002 2002 2 24 269 38 62 50 18 7627.5
2/25/2002 2002 2 25 270 37 57 47 15 7642.5
2/26/2002 2002 2 26 271 29 44 36.5 4.5 7647
2/27/2002 2002 2 27 272 26 53 39.5 7.5 7654.5
2/28/2002 2002 2 28 273 29 65 47 15 7669.5
3/1/2002 2002 3 1 274 28 48 38 6 7675.5
3/2/2002 2002 3 2 275 23 37 30 -2 7673.5
3/3/2002 2002 3 3 276 21 41 31 -1 7672.5
3/4/2002 2002 3 4 277 24 50 37 5 7677.5
3/5/2002 2002 3 5 278 27 56 41.5 9.5 7687
3/6/2002 2002 3 6 279 34 61 47.5 15.5 7702.5
3/7/2002 2002 3 7 280 42 64 53 21 7723.5
3/8/2002 2002 3 8 281 32 47 39.5 7.5 7731
3/9/2002 2002 3 9 282 26 49 37.5 5.5 7736.5
3/10/2002 2002 3 10 283 32 57 44.5 12.5 7749
3/11/2002 2002 3 11 284 42 60 51 19 7768
3/12/2002 2002 3 12 285 40 61 50.5 18.5 7786.5
3/13/2002 2002 3 13 286 39 73 56 24 7810.5
3/14/2002 2002 3 14 287 32 46 39 7 7817.5
3/15/2002 2002 3 15 288 29 47 38 6 7823.5
3/16/2002 2002 3 16 289 30 46 38 6 7829.5
3/17/2002 2002 3 17 290 26 46 36 4 7833.5
3/18/2002 2002 3 18 291 34 51 42.5 10.5 7844
3/19/2002 2002 3 19 292 30 55 42.5 10.5 7854.5
3/20/2002 2002 3 20 293 34 63 48.5 16.5 7871
3/21/2002 2002 3 21 294 40 68 54 22 7893
3/22/2002 2002 3 22 295 46 77 61.5 29.5 7922.5
3/23/2002 2002 3 23 296 50 65 57.5 25.5 7948
3/24/2002 2002 3 24 297 41 54 47.5 15.5 7963.5
3/25/2002 2002 3 25 298 35 61 48 16 7979.5
3/26/2002 2002 3 26 299 40 65 52.5 20.5 8000
3/27/2002 2002 3 27 300 41 73 57 25 8025
3/28/2002 2002 3 28 301 44 74 59 27 8052
3/29/2002 2002 3 29 302 47 74 60.5 28.5 8080.5
3/30/2002 2002 3 30 303 49 76 62.5 30.5 8111
3/31/2002 2002 3 31 304 48 73 60.5 28.5 8139.5
4/1/2002 2002 4 1 305 50 81 65.5 33.5 8173
4/2/2002 2002 4 2 306 51 83 67 35 8208
4/3/2002 2002 4 3 307 53 81 67 35 8243
4/4/2002 2002 4 4 308 52 79 65.5 33.5 8276.5
4/5/2002 2002 4 5 309 53 80 66.5 34.5 8311
4/6/2002 2002 4 6 310 51 69 60 28 8339
4/7/2002 2002 4 7 311 47 75 61 29 8368
4/8/2002 2002 4 8 312 48 77 62.5 30.5 8398.5
4/9/2002 2002 4 9 313 51 79 65 33 8431.5
4/10/2002 2002 4 10 314 60 76 68 36 8467.5
4/11/2002 2002 4 11 315 52 79 65.5 33.5 8501
4/12/2002 2002 4 12 316 60 74 67 35 8536
4/13/2002 2002 4 13 317 50 78 64 32 8568
4/14/2002 2002 4 14 318 53 86 69.5 37.5 8605.5
4/15/2002 2002 4 15 319 49 76 62.5 30.5 8636
4/17/2002 2002 4 17 321 52 74 63 31 8667
4/18/2002 2002 4 18 322 46 73 59.5 27.5 8694.5
4/19/2002 2002 4 19 323 41 70 55.5 23.5 8718
4/20/2002 2002 4 20 324 43 59 51 19 8737
4/21/2002 2002 4 21 325 39 67 53 21 8758
4/22/2002 2002 4 22 326 43 77 60 28 8786
4/23/2002 2002 4 23 327 48 82 65 33 8819
4/24/2002 2002 4 24 328 54 82 68 36 8855
4/25/2002 2002 4 25 329 65 82 73.5 41.5 8896.5
4/26/2002 2002 4 26 330 53 75 64 32 8928.5
4/27/2002 2002 4 27 331 51 65 58 26 8954.5
4/28/2002 2002 4 28 332 45 74 59.5 27.5 8982
4/29/2002 2002 4 29 333 50 82 66 34 9016
4/30/2002 2002 4 30 334 56 79 67.5 35.5 9051.5
5/1/2002 2002 5 1 335 49 69 59 27 9078.5
5/2/2002 2002 5 2 336 44 69 56.5 24.5 9103
5/3/2002 2002 5 3 337 48 74 61 29 9132
5/4/2002 2002 5 4 338 50 79 64.5 32.5 9164.5
5/5/2002 2002 5 5 339 54 80 67 35 9199.5
5/6/2002 2002 5 6 340 54 85 69.5 37.5 9237
5/7/2002 2002 5 7 341 58 81 69.5 37.5 9274.5
5/8/2002 2002 5 8 342 52 74 63 31 9305.5
5/9/2002 2002 5 9 343 46 78 62 30 9335.5
5/10/2002 2002 5 10 344 65 82 73.5 41.5 9377
5/11/2002 2002 5 11 345 51 76 63.5 31.5 9408.5
5/12/2002 2002 5 12 346 52 75 63.5 31.5 9440
5/13/2002 2002 5 13 347 53 81 67 35 9475
5/14/2002 2002 5 14 348 59 88 73.5 41.5 9516.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
5/15/2002 2002 5 15 349 58 87 72.5 40.5 9557
5/16/2002 2002 5 16 350 61 88 74.5 42.5 9599.5
5/17/2002 2002 5 17 351 60 89 74.5 42.5 9642
5/18/2002 2002 5 18 352 62 91 76.5 44.5 9686.5
5/19/2002 2002 5 19 353 61 91 76 44 9730.5
5/20/2002 2002 5 20 354 62 88 75 43 9773.5
5/21/2002 2002 5 21 355 52 67 59.5 27.5 9801
5/22/2002 2002 5 22 356 44 71 57.5 25.5 9826.5
5/23/2002 2002 5 23 357 50 72 61 29 9855.5
5/24/2002 2002 5 24 358 51 76 63.5 31.5 9887
5/25/2002 2002 5 25 359 53 84 68.5 36.5 9923.5
5/26/2002 2002 5 26 360 60 85 72.5 40.5 9964
5/27/2002 2002 5 27 361 60 88 74 42 10006
5/28/2002 2002 5 28 362 62 91 76.5 44.5 10050.5
5/29/2002 2002 5 29 363 64 94 79 47 10097.5
5/30/2002 2002 5 30 364 67 100 83.5 51.5 10149
5/31/2002 2002 5 31 365 69 102 85.5 53.5 10202.5
6/1/2002 2002 6 1 1 73 95 84 52 52
6/2/2002 2002 6 2 2 68 89 78.5 46.5 98.5
6/3/2002 2002 6 3 3 67 83 75 43 141.5
6/4/2002 2002 6 4 4 58 84 71 39 180.5
6/5/2002 2002 6 5 5 62 88 75 43 223.5
6/6/2002 2002 6 6 6 63 98 80.5 48.5 272
6/7/2002 2002 6 7 7 70 100 85 53 325
6/8/2002 2002 6 8 8 69 97 83 51 376
6/9/2002 2002 6 9 9 65 93 79 47 423
6/10/2002 2002 6 10 10 56 86 71 39 462
6/11/2002 2002 6 11 11 59 89 74 42 504
6/12/2002 2002 6 12 12 61 93 77 45 549
6/13/2002 2002 6 13 13 66 96 81 49 598
6/14/2002 2002 6 14 14 66 98 82 50 648
6/15/2002 2002 6 15 15 68 99 83.5 51.5 699.5
6/16/2002 2002 6 16 16 69 100 84.5 52.5 752
6/17/2002 2002 6 17 17 70 101 85.5 53.5 805.5
6/18/2002 2002 6 18 18 69 100 84.5 52.5 858
6/20/2002 2002 6 20 20 72 98 85 53 911
6/21/2002 2002 6 21 21 73 98 85.5 53.5 964.5
6/22/2002 2002 6 22 22 70 94 82 50 1014.5
6/23/2002 2002 6 23 23 66 96 81 49 1063.5
6/24/2002 2002 6 24 24 69 100 84.5 52.5 1116
6/25/2002 2002 6 25 25 70 101 85.5 53.5 1169.5
6/26/2002 2002 6 26 26 71 99 85 53 1222.5
6/27/2002 2002 6 27 27 71 99 85 53 1275.5
6/28/2002 2002 6 28 28 70 100 85 53 1328.5
6/29/2002 2002 6 29 29 71 101 86 54 1382.5
6/30/2002 2002 6 30 30 71 102 86.5 54.5 1437
7/1/2002 2002 7 1 31 75 104 89.5 57.5 1494.5
7/2/2002 2002 7 2 32 78 101 89.5 57.5 1552
7/3/2002 2002 7 3 33 73 89 81 49 1601
7/4/2002 2002 7 4 34 68 94 81 49 1650
7/5/2002 2002 7 5 35 72 101 86.5 54.5 1704.5
7/6/2002 2002 7 6 36 74 102 88 56 1760.5
7/7/2002 2002 7 7 37 75 104 89.5 57.5 1818
7/8/2002 2002 7 8 38 80 105 92.5 60.5 1878.5
7/9/2002 2002 7 9 39 77 102 89.5 57.5 1936
7/10/2002 2002 7 10 40 75 99 87 55 1991
7/11/2002 2002 7 11 41 74 101 87.5 55.5 2046.5
7/12/2002 2002 7 12 42 80 105 92.5 60.5 2107
7/13/2002 2002 7 13 43 75 105 90 58 2165
7/14/2002 2002 7 14 44 81 107 94 62 2227
7/15/2002 2002 7 15 45 71 100 85.5 53.5 2280.5
7/16/2002 2002 7 16 46 71 93 82 50 2330.5
7/17/2002 2002 7 17 47 73 93 83 51 2381.5
7/18/2002 2002 7 18 48 71 93 82 50 2431.5
7/19/2002 2002 7 19 49 75 95 85 53 2484.5
7/20/2002 2002 7 20 50 71 98 84.5 52.5 2537
7/21/2002 2002 7 21 51 74 100 87 55 2592
7/22/2002 2002 7 22 52 76 102 89 57 2649
7/23/2002 2002 7 23 53 75 97 86 54 2703
7/24/2002 2002 7 24 54 74 98 86 54 2757
7/25/2002 2002 7 25 55 73 95 84 52 2809
7/26/2002 2002 7 26 56 73 95 84 52 2861
7/27/2002 2002 7 27 57 73 97 85 53 2914
7/28/2002 2002 7 28 58 72 98 85 53 2967
7/29/2002 2002 7 29 59 70 100 85 53 3020
7/30/2002 2002 7 30 60 73 103 88 56 3076
7/31/2002 2002 7 31 61 77 103 90 58 3134
8/1/2002 2002 8 1 62 81 101 91 59 3193
8/2/2002 2002 8 2 63 72 90 81 49 3242
8/3/2002 2002 8 3 64 67 90 78.5 46.5 3288.5
8/4/2002 2002 8 4 65 67 91 79 47 3335.5
8/5/2002 2002 8 5 66 73 93 83 51 3386.5
8/6/2002 2002 8 6 67 70 85 77.5 45.5 3432
8/7/2002 2002 8 7 68 67 92 79.5 47.5 3479.5
8/8/2002 2002 8 8 69 67 94 80.5 48.5 3528
8/9/2002 2002 8 9 70 66 98 82 50 3578
8/10/2002 2002 8 10 71 69 100 84.5 52.5 3630.5
8/11/2002 2002 8 11 72 70 101 85.5 53.5 3684
8/12/2002 2002 8 12 73 72 104 88 56 3740
8/13/2002 2002 8 13 74 74 101 87.5 55.5 3795.5
8/14/2002 2002 8 14 75 70 102 86 54 3849.5
8/15/2002 2002 8 15 76 71 102 86.5 54.5 3904
8/16/2002 2002 8 16 77 74 103 88.5 56.5 3960.5
8/17/2002 2002 8 17 78 77 102 89.5 57.5 4018
8/19/2002 2002 8 19 80 75 104 89.5 57.5 4075.5
8/20/2002 2002 8 20 81 69 87 78 46 4121.5
8/21/2002 2002 8 21 82 70 91 80.5 48.5 4170
8/22/2002 2002 8 22 83 65 91 78 46 4216
8/23/2002 2002 8 23 84 67 92 79.5 47.5 4263.5
8/24/2002 2002 8 24 85 64 92 78 46 4309.5
8/25/2002 2002 8 25 86 66 94 80 48 4357.5
8/26/2002 2002 8 26 87 66 98 82 50 4407.5
8/27/2002 2002 8 27 88 66 95 80.5 48.5 4456
8/28/2002 2002 8 28 89 68 95 81.5 49.5 4505.5
8/29/2002 2002 8 29 90 69 90 79.5 47.5 4553
8/30/2002 2002 8 30 91 67 93 80 48 4601
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
8/31/2002 2002 8 31 92 66 93 79.5 47.5 4648.5
9/1/2002 2002 9 1 93 70 96 83 51 4699.5
9/2/2002 2002 9 2 94 68 93 80.5 48.5 4748
9/3/2002 2002 9 3 95 71 92 81.5 49.5 4797.5
9/4/2002 2002 9 4 96 66 95 80.5 48.5 4846
9/5/2002 2002 9 5 97 69 93 81 49 4895
9/6/2002 2002 9 6 98 63 77 70 38 4933
9/7/2002 2002 9 7 99 58 69 63.5 31.5 4964.5
9/8/2002 2002 9 8 100 60 76 68 36 5000.5
9/9/2002 2002 9 9 101 60 77 68.5 36.5 5037
9/10/2002 2002 9 10 102 64 81 72.5 40.5 5077.5
9/11/2002 2002 9 11 103 62 76 69 37 5114.5
9/12/2002 2002 9 12 104 60 76 68 36 5150.5
9/13/2002 2002 9 13 105 61 81 71 39 5189.5
9/14/2002 2002 9 14 106 57 86 71.5 39.5 5229
9/15/2002 2002 9 15 107 61 84 72.5 40.5 5269.5
9/16/2002 2002 9 16 108 64 88 76 44 5313.5
9/17/2002 2002 9 17 109 60 87 73.5 41.5 5355
9/18/2002 2002 9 18 110 62 76 69 37 5392
9/19/2002 2002 9 19 111 54 74 64 32 5424
9/20/2002 2002 9 20 112 55 81 68 36 5460
9/21/2002 2002 9 21 113 58 89 73.5 41.5 5501.5
9/22/2002 2002 9 22 114 60 89 74.5 42.5 5544
9/23/2002 2002 9 23 115 61 89 75 43 5587
9/24/2002 2002 9 24 116 59 90 74.5 42.5 5629.5
9/25/2002 2002 9 25 117 63 85 74 42 5671.5
9/26/2002 2002 9 26 118 63 84 73.5 41.5 5713
9/27/2002 2002 9 27 119 67 85 76 44 5757
9/28/2002 2002 9 28 120 55 78 66.5 34.5 5791.5
9/29/2002 2002 9 29 121 53 71 62 30 5821.5
9/30/2002 2002 9 30 122 50 72 61 29 5850.5
10/1/2002 2002 10 1 123 54 74 64 32 5882.5
10/2/2002 2002 10 2 124 45 55 50 18 5900.5
10/3/2002 2002 10 3 125 43 61 52 20 5920.5
10/4/2002 2002 10 4 126 44 64 54 22 5942.5
10/5/2002 2002 10 5 127 47 70 58.5 26.5 5969
10/6/2002 2002 10 6 128 50 72 61 29 5998
10/7/2002 2002 10 7 129 50 74 62 30 6028
10/8/2002 2002 10 8 130 50 76 63 31 6059
10/9/2002 2002 10 9 131 51 79 65 33 6092
10/10/2002 2002 10 10 132 51 79 65 33 6125
10/11/2002 2002 10 11 133 54 78 66 34 6159
10/12/2002 2002 10 12 134 53 72 62.5 30.5 6189.5
10/13/2002 2002 10 13 135 47 71 59 27 6216.5
10/14/2002 2002 10 14 136 47 70 58.5 26.5 6243
10/15/2002 2002 10 15 137 46 72 59 27 6270
10/16/2002 2002 10 16 138 47 73 60 28 6298
10/17/2002 2002 10 17 139 50 65 57.5 25.5 6323.5
10/18/2002 2002 10 18 140 46 68 57 25 6348.5
10/19/2002 2002 10 19 141 47 70 58.5 26.5 6375
10/20/2002 2002 10 20 142 46 72 59 27 6402
10/21/2002 2002 10 21 143 47 70 58.5 26.5 6428.5
10/22/2002 2002 10 22 144 47 59 53 21 6449.5
10/23/2002 2002 10 23 145 45 61 53 21 6470.5
10/24/2002 2002 10 24 146 45 63 54 22 6492.5
10/25/2002 2002 10 25 147 44 60 52 20 6512.5
10/26/2002 2002 10 26 148 46 62 54 22 6534.5
10/27/2002 2002 10 27 149 45 57 51 19 6553.5
10/28/2002 2002 10 28 150 41 59 50 18 6571.5
10/29/2002 2002 10 29 151 41 53 47 15 6586.5
10/30/2002 2002 10 30 152 38 58 48 16 6602.5
10/31/2002 2002 10 31 153 43 64 53.5 21.5 6624
11/1/2002 2002 11 1 154 44 61 52.5 20.5 6644.5
11/2/2002 2002 11 2 155 44 62 53 21 6665.5
11/3/2002 2002 11 3 156 36 47 41.5 9.5 6675
11/4/2002 2002 11 4 157 33 51 42 10 6685
11/5/2002 2002 11 5 158 35 56 45.5 13.5 6698.5
11/6/2002 2002 11 6 159 33 57 45 13 6711.5
11/7/2002 2002 11 7 160 35 54 44.5 12.5 6724
11/8/2002 2002 11 8 161 43 59 51 19 6743
11/9/2002 2002 11 9 162 47 69 58 26 6769
11/10/2002 2002 11 10 163 40 56 48 16 6785
11/11/2002 2002 11 11 164 40 54 47 15 6800
11/12/2002 2002 11 12 165 34 52 43 11 6811
11/13/2002 2002 11 13 166 38 51 44.5 12.5 6823.5
11/14/2002 2002 11 14 167 34 56 45 13 6836.5
11/15/2002 2002 11 15 168 38 54 46 14 6850.5
11/16/2002 2002 11 16 169 33 51 42 10 6860.5
11/17/2002 2002 11 17 170 34 49 41.5 9.5 6870
11/18/2002 2002 11 18 171 34 53 43.5 11.5 6881.5
11/19/2002 2002 11 19 172 31 52 41.5 9.5 6891
11/20/2002 2002 11 20 173 33 57 45 13 6904
11/21/2002 2002 11 21 174 36 56 46 14 6918
11/22/2002 2002 11 22 175 35 56 45.5 13.5 6931.5
11/23/2002 2002 11 23 176 37 57 47 15 6946.5
11/24/2002 2002 11 24 177 36 57 46.5 14.5 6961
11/25/2002 2002 11 25 178 36 49 42.5 10.5 6971.5
11/26/2002 2002 11 26 179 30 47 38.5 6.5 6978
11/27/2002 2002 11 27 180 29 47 38 6 6984
11/28/2002 2002 11 28 181 28 48 38 6 6990
11/29/2002 2002 11 29 182 33 50 41.5 9.5 6999.5
11/30/2002 2002 11 30 183 38 48 43 11 7010.5
12/1/2002 2002 12 1 184 37 48 42.5 10.5 7021
12/2/2002 2002 12 2 185 35 45 40 8 7029
12/3/2002 2002 12 3 186 37 50 43.5 11.5 7040.5
12/4/2002 2002 12 4 187 34 50 42 10 7050.5
12/5/2002 2002 12 5 188 32 49 40.5 8.5 7059
12/6/2002 2002 12 6 189 35 47 41 9 7068
12/7/2002 2002 12 7 190 33 47 40 8 7076
12/8/2002 2002 12 8 191 31 50 40.5 8.5 7084.5
12/9/2002 2002 12 9 192 30 45 37.5 5.5 7090
12/10/2002 2002 12 10 193 31 46 38.5 6.5 7096.5
12/11/2002 2002 12 11 194 31 50 40.5 8.5 7105
12/12/2002 2002 12 12 195 32 49 40.5 8.5 7113.5
12/13/2002 2002 12 13 196 31 46 38.5 6.5 7120
12/14/2002 2002 12 14 197 31 47 39 7 7127
12/15/2002 2002 12 15 198 37 54 45.5 13.5 7140.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
12/16/2002 2002 12 16 199 36 55 45.5 13.5 7154
12/17/2002 2002 12 17 200 33 46 39.5 7.5 7161.5
12/20/2002 2002 12 20 203 28 34 31 -1 7160.5
12/21/2002 2002 12 21 204 22 36 29 -3 7157.5
12/22/2002 2002 12 22 205 30 37 33.5 1.5 7159
12/23/2002 2002 12 23 206 30 33 31.5 -0.5 7158.5
12/24/2002 2002 12 24 207 28 37 32.5 0.5 7159
12/25/2002 2002 12 25 208 24 37 30.5 -1.5 7157.5
12/26/2002 2002 12 26 209 22 36 29 -3 7154.5
12/27/2002 2002 12 27 210 21 33 27 -5 7149.5
12/28/2002 2002 12 28 211 23 37 30 -2 7147.5
12/29/2002 2002 12 29 212 26 37 31.5 -0.5 7147
12/30/2002 2002 12 30 213 28 41 34.5 2.5 7149.5
12/31/2002 2002 12 31 214 29 40 34.5 2.5 7152
1/1/2003 2003 1 1 215 29 45 37 5 7157
1/2/2003 2003 1 2 216 26 43 34.5 2.5 7159.5
1/3/2003 2003 1 3 217 28 44 36 4 7163.5
1/4/2003 2003 1 4 218 28 46 37 5 7168.5
1/5/2003 2003 1 5 219 29 46 37.5 5.5 7174
1/6/2003 2003 1 6 220 38 54 46 14 7188
1/7/2003 2003 1 7 221 34 52 43 11 7199
1/8/2003 2003 1 8 222 32 49 40.5 8.5 7207.5
1/9/2003 2003 1 9 223 36 50 43 11 7218.5
1/10/2003 2003 1 10 224 37 49 43 11 7229.5
1/11/2003 2003 1 11 225 39 49 44 12 7241.5
1/12/2003 2003 1 12 226 33 47 40 8 7249.5
1/13/2003 2003 1 13 227 33 45 39 7 7256.5
1/14/2003 2003 1 14 228 32 40 36 4 7260.5
1/15/2003 2003 1 15 229 37 49 43 11 7271.5
1/16/2003 2003 1 16 230 31 50 40.5 8.5 7280
1/17/2003 2003 1 17 231 32 50 41 9 7289
1/18/2003 2003 1 18 232 30 49 39.5 7.5 7296.5
1/19/2003 2003 1 19 233 30 51 40.5 8.5 7305
1/20/2003 2003 1 20 234 32 51 41.5 9.5 7314.5
1/21/2003 2003 1 21 235 33 54 43.5 11.5 7326
1/22/2003 2003 1 22 236 37 57 47 15 7341
1/23/2003 2003 1 23 237 36 52 44 12 7353
1/24/2003 2003 1 24 238 36 56 46 14 7367
1/25/2003 2003 1 25 239 39 56 47.5 15.5 7382.5
1/26/2003 2003 1 26 240 34 55 44.5 12.5 7395
1/27/2003 2003 1 27 241 35 55 45 13 7408
1/28/2003 2003 1 28 242 33 60 46.5 14.5 7422.5
1/29/2003 2003 1 29 243 37 55 46 14 7436.5
1/30/2003 2003 1 30 244 35 56 45.5 13.5 7450
1/31/2003 2003 1 31 245 37 63 50 18 7468
2/1/2003 2003 2 1 246 39 59 49 17 7485
2/2/2003 2003 2 2 247 39 60 49.5 17.5 7502.5
2/3/2003 2003 2 3 248 34 49 41.5 9.5 7512
2/4/2003 2003 2 4 249 28 48 38 6 7518
2/5/2003 2003 2 5 250 29 42 35.5 3.5 7521.5
2/6/2003 2003 2 6 251 24 39 31.5 -0.5 7521
2/7/2003 2003 2 7 252 22 39 30.5 -1.5 7519.5
2/8/2003 2003 2 8 253 22 41 31.5 -0.5 7519
2/9/2003 2003 2 9 254 24 50 37 5 7524
2/10/2003 2003 2 10 255 27 49 38 6 7530
2/11/2003 2003 2 11 256 30 46 38 6 7536
2/12/2003 2003 2 12 257 35 42 38.5 6.5 7542.5
2/13/2003 2003 2 13 258 37 43 40 8 7550.5
2/14/2003 2003 2 14 259 40 50 45 13 7563.5
2/15/2003 2003 2 15 260 38 55 46.5 14.5 7578
2/16/2003 2003 2 16 261 38 57 47.5 15.5 7593.5
2/17/2003 2003 2 17 262 42 57 49.5 17.5 7611
2/18/2003 2003 2 18 263 39 51 45 13 7624
2/19/2003 2003 2 19 264 33 50 41.5 9.5 7633.5
2/20/2003 2003 2 20 265 41 53 47 15 7648.5
2/21/2003 2003 2 21 266 38 61 49.5 17.5 7666
2/22/2003 2003 2 22 267 36 60 48 16 7682
2/23/2003 2003 2 23 268 32 51 41.5 9.5 7691.5
2/24/2003 2003 2 24 269 39 51 45 13 7704.5
2/25/2003 2003 2 25 270 40 53 46.5 14.5 7719
2/27/2003 2003 2 27 272 34 42 38 6 7725
2/28/2003 2003 2 28 273 33 47 40 8 7733
3/1/2003 2003 3 1 274 32 43 37.5 5.5 7738.5
3/2/2003 2003 3 2 275 33 47 40 8 7746.5
3/3/2003 2003 3 3 276 31 49 40 8 7754.5
3/4/2003 2003 3 4 277 37 47 42 10 7764.5
3/5/2003 2003 3 5 278 35 50 42.5 10.5 7775
3/6/2003 2003 3 6 279 34 59 46.5 14.5 7789.5
3/7/2003 2003 3 7 280 37 63 50 18 7807.5
3/8/2003 2003 3 8 281 39 67 53 21 7828.5
3/9/2003 2003 3 9 282 39 66 52.5 20.5 7849
3/10/2003 2003 3 10 283 41 68 54.5 22.5 7871.5
3/11/2003 2003 3 11 284 44 72 58 26 7897.5
3/12/2003 2003 3 12 285 46 71 58.5 26.5 7924
3/13/2003 2003 3 13 286 46 76 61 29 7953
3/14/2003 2003 3 14 287 50 69 59.5 27.5 7980.5
3/15/2003 2003 3 15 288 45 61 53 21 8001.5
3/16/2003 2003 3 16 289 45 57 51 19 8020.5
3/17/2003 2003 3 17 290 42 56 49 17 8037.5
3/18/2003 2003 3 18 291 42 51 46.5 14.5 8052
3/19/2003 2003 3 19 292 42 56 49 17 8069
3/20/2003 2003 3 20 293 40 61 50.5 18.5 8087.5
3/21/2003 2003 3 21 294 43 63 53 21 8108.5
3/22/2003 2003 3 22 295 41 65 53 21 8129.5
3/23/2003 2003 3 23 296 44 73 58.5 26.5 8156
3/24/2003 2003 3 24 297 51 69 60 28 8184
3/25/2003 2003 3 25 298 42 65 53.5 21.5 8205.5
3/26/2003 2003 3 26 299 52 73 62.5 30.5 8236
3/27/2003 2003 3 27 300 41 58 49.5 17.5 8253.5
3/28/2003 2003 3 28 301 36 53 44.5 12.5 8266
3/29/2003 2003 3 29 302 33 55 44 12 8278
3/30/2003 2003 3 30 303 36 65 50.5 18.5 8296.5
3/31/2003 2003 3 31 304 41 72 56.5 24.5 8321
4/1/2003 2003 4 1 305 48 77 62.5 30.5 8351.5
4/2/2003 2003 4 2 306 52 67 59.5 27.5 8379
4/3/2003 2003 4 3 307 41 56 48.5 16.5 8395.5
4/4/2003 2003 4 4 308 34 61 47.5 15.5 8411
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
4/5/2003 2003 4 5 309 37 50 43.5 11.5 8422.5
4/6/2003 2003 4 6 310 33 57 45 13 8435.5
4/7/2003 2003 4 7 311 40 58 49 17 8452.5
4/8/2003 2003 4 8 312 36 63 49.5 17.5 8470
4/9/2003 2003 4 9 313 40 71 55.5 23.5 8493.5
4/10/2003 2003 4 10 314 46 78 62 30 8523.5
4/11/2003 2003 4 11 315 49 77 63 31 8554.5
4/12/2003 2003 4 12 316 50 77 63.5 31.5 8586
4/13/2003 2003 4 13 317 54 76 65 33 8619
4/14/2003 2003 4 14 318 54 75 64.5 32.5 8651.5
4/15/2003 2003 4 15 319 39 59 49 17 8668.5
4/16/2003 2003 4 16 320 38 62 50 18 8686.5
4/17/2003 2003 4 17 321 44 65 54.5 22.5 8709
4/18/2003 2003 4 18 322 39 57 48 16 8725
4/19/2003 2003 4 19 323 38 64 51 19 8744
4/20/2003 2003 4 20 324 42 69 55.5 23.5 8767.5
4/21/2003 2003 4 21 325 50 71 60.5 28.5 8796
4/22/2003 2003 4 22 326 38 63 50.5 18.5 8814.5
4/23/2003 2003 4 23 327 35 60 47.5 15.5 8830
4/24/2003 2003 4 24 328 44 71 57.5 25.5 8855.5
4/25/2003 2003 4 25 329 49 78 63.5 31.5 8887
4/26/2003 2003 4 26 330 54 78 66 34 8921
4/27/2003 2003 4 27 331 50 79 64.5 32.5 8953.5
4/28/2003 2003 4 28 332 55 77 66 34 8987.5
4/29/2003 2003 4 29 333 56 73 64.5 32.5 9020
4/30/2003 2003 4 30 334 45 68 56.5 24.5 9044.5
5/1/2003 2003 5 1 335 46 69 57.5 25.5 9070
5/2/2003 2003 5 2 336 50 77 63.5 31.5 9101.5
5/3/2003 2003 5 3 337 45 71 58 26 9127.5
5/4/2003 2003 5 4 338 42 67 54.5 22.5 9150
5/5/2003 2003 5 5 339 49 68 58.5 26.5 9176.5
5/6/2003 2003 5 6 340 46 71 58.5 26.5 9203
5/7/2003 2003 5 7 341 50 71 60.5 28.5 9231.5
5/8/2003 2003 5 8 342 46 68 57 25 9256.5
5/9/2003 2003 5 9 343 46 58 52 20 9276.5
5/10/2003 2003 5 10 344 41 68 54.5 22.5 9299
5/11/2003 2003 5 11 345 44 76 60 28 9327
5/12/2003 2003 5 12 346 51 82 66.5 34.5 9361.5
5/13/2003 2003 5 13 347 62 82 72 40 9401.5
5/14/2003 2003 5 14 348 60 82 71 39 9440.5
5/15/2003 2003 5 15 349 55 80 67.5 35.5 9476
5/16/2003 2003 5 16 350 58 89 73.5 41.5 9517.5
5/17/2003 2003 5 17 351 62 90 76 44 9561.5
5/18/2003 2003 5 18 352 64 84 74 42 9603.5
5/19/2003 2003 5 19 353 58 83 70.5 38.5 9642
5/20/2003 2003 5 20 354 56 86 71 39 9681
5/21/2003 2003 5 21 355 60 89 74.5 42.5 9723.5
5/22/2003 2003 5 22 356 61 93 77 45 9768.5
5/23/2003 2003 5 23 357 66 91 78.5 46.5 9815
5/24/2003 2003 5 24 358 64 95 79.5 47.5 9862.5
5/25/2003 2003 5 25 359 67 93 80 48 9910.5
5/26/2003 2003 5 26 360 67 94 80.5 48.5 9959
5/27/2003 2003 5 27 361 69 97 83 51 10010
5/28/2003 2003 5 28 362 70 99 84.5 52.5 10062.5
5/29/2003 2003 5 29 363 73 98 85.5 53.5 10116
5/30/2003 2003 5 30 364 73 98 85.5 53.5 10169.5
5/31/2003 2003 5 31 365 67 94 80.5 48.5 10218
6/1/2003 2003 6 1 1 69 96 82.5 50.5 50.5
6/2/2003 2003 6 2 2 69 98 83.5 51.5 102
6/3/2003 2003 6 3 3 72 97 84.5 52.5 154.5
6/4/2003 2003 6 4 4 72 96 84 52 206.5
6/5/2003 2003 6 5 5 69 88 78.5 46.5 253
6/6/2003 2003 6 6 6 62 92 77 45 298
6/7/2003 2003 6 7 7 68 95 81.5 49.5 347.5
6/8/2003 2003 6 8 8 66 92 79 47 394.5
6/9/2003 2003 6 9 9 66 93 79.5 47.5 442
6/10/2003 2003 6 10 10 67 89 78 46 488
6/11/2003 2003 6 11 11 61 88 74.5 42.5 530.5
6/12/2003 2003 6 12 12 64 89 76.5 44.5 575
6/13/2003 2003 6 13 13 64 91 77.5 45.5 620.5
6/14/2003 2003 6 14 14 64 95 79.5 47.5 668
6/15/2003 2003 6 15 15 66 100 83 51 719
6/16/2003 2003 6 16 16 68 97 82.5 50.5 769.5
6/17/2003 2003 6 17 17 71 97 84 52 821.5
6/18/2003 2003 6 18 18 71 94 82.5 50.5 872
6/19/2003 2003 6 19 19 73 94 83.5 51.5 923.5
6/20/2003 2003 6 20 20 65 86 75.5 43.5 967
6/21/2003 2003 6 21 21 66 89 77.5 45.5 1012.5
6/22/2003 2003 6 22 22 68 89 78.5 46.5 1059
6/23/2003 2003 6 23 23 67 89 78 46 1105
6/24/2003 2003 6 24 24 64 80 72 40 1145
6/25/2003 2003 6 25 25 56 81 68.5 36.5 1181.5
6/26/2003 2003 6 26 26 62 87 74.5 42.5 1224
6/27/2003 2003 6 27 27 63 96 79.5 47.5 1271.5
6/28/2003 2003 6 28 28 68 98 83 51 1322.5
6/29/2003 2003 6 29 29 71 101 86 54 1376.5
6/30/2003 2003 6 30 30 71 100 85.5 53.5 1430
7/1/2003 2003 7 1 31 70 96 83 51 1481
7/2/2003 2003 7 2 32 69 98 83.5 51.5 1532.5
7/3/2003 2003 7 3 33 69 99 84 52 1584.5
7/4/2003 2003 7 4 34 70 103 86.5 54.5 1639
7/5/2003 2003 7 5 35 76 103 89.5 57.5 1696.5
7/6/2003 2003 7 6 36 72 101 86.5 54.5 1751
7/7/2003 2003 7 7 37 72 101 86.5 54.5 1805.5
7/8/2003 2003 7 8 38 73 102 87.5 55.5 1861
7/9/2003 2003 7 9 39 72 102 87 55 1916
7/10/2003 2003 7 10 40 75 105 90 58 1974
7/12/2003 2003 7 12 42 78 106 92 60 2034
7/13/2003 2003 7 13 43 77 107 92 60 2094
7/14/2003 2003 7 14 44 78 106 92 60 2154
7/15/2003 2003 7 15 45 79 105 92 60 2214
7/16/2003 2003 7 16 46 85 103 94 62 2276
7/17/2003 2003 7 17 47 79 104 91.5 59.5 2335.5
7/18/2003 2003 7 18 48 76 103 89.5 57.5 2393
7/20/2003 2003 7 20 50 79 103 91 59 2452
7/21/2003 2003 7 21 51 77 103 90 58 2510
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
7/22/2003 2003 7 22 52 79 104 91.5 59.5 2569.5
7/23/2003 2003 7 23 53 78 102 90 58 2627.5
7/24/2003 2003 7 24 54 75 100 87.5 55.5 2683
7/25/2003 2003 7 25 55 73 96 84.5 52.5 2735.5
7/26/2003 2003 7 26 56 69 100 84.5 52.5 2788
7/27/2003 2003 7 27 57 77 97 87 55 2843
7/28/2003 2003 7 28 58 73 95 84 52 2895
7/29/2003 2003 7 29 59 77 96 86.5 54.5 2949.5
7/30/2003 2003 7 30 60 76 99 87.5 55.5 3005
7/31/2003 2003 7 31 61 73 94 83.5 51.5 3056.5
8/1/2003 2003 8 1 62 75 94 84.5 52.5 3109
8/2/2003 2003 8 2 63 68 88 78 46 3155
8/3/2003 2003 8 3 64 69 93 81 49 3204
8/4/2003 2003 8 4 65 70 97 83.5 51.5 3255.5
8/5/2003 2003 8 5 66 70 99 84.5 52.5 3308
8/6/2003 2003 8 6 67 72 99 85.5 53.5 3361.5
8/7/2003 2003 8 7 68 76 94 85 53 3414.5
8/8/2003 2003 8 8 69 70 97 83.5 51.5 3466
8/9/2003 2003 8 9 70 74 99 86.5 54.5 3520.5
8/10/2003 2003 8 10 71 74 102 88 56 3576.5
8/11/2003 2003 8 11 72 78 104 91 59 3635.5
8/12/2003 2003 8 12 73 80 99 89.5 57.5 3693
8/13/2003 2003 8 13 74 74 98 86 54 3747
8/14/2003 2003 8 14 75 68 100 84 52 3799
8/15/2003 2003 8 15 76 65 88 76.5 44.5 3843.5
8/16/2003 2003 8 16 77 65 82 73.5 41.5 3885
8/17/2003 2003 8 17 78 67 92 79.5 47.5 3932.5
8/18/2003 2003 8 18 79 71 98 84.5 52.5 3985
8/19/2003 2003 8 19 80 75 96 85.5 53.5 4038.5
8/20/2003 2003 8 20 81 72 92 82 50 4088.5
8/21/2003 2003 8 21 82 70 92 81 49 4137.5
8/22/2003 2003 8 22 83 67 93 80 48 4185.5
8/23/2003 2003 8 23 84 67 82 74.5 42.5 4228
8/24/2003 2003 8 24 85 69 91 80 48 4276
8/25/2003 2003 8 25 86 70 95 82.5 50.5 4326.5
8/26/2003 2003 8 26 87 74 94 84 52 4378.5
8/27/2003 2003 8 27 88 71 89 80 48 4426.5
8/28/2003 2003 8 28 89 73 93 83 51 4477.5
8/29/2003 2003 8 29 90 70 91 80.5 48.5 4526
8/30/2003 2003 8 30 91 72 93 82.5 50.5 4576.5
8/31/2003 2003 8 31 92 68 93 80.5 48.5 4625
9/1/2003 2003 9 1 93 68 95 81.5 49.5 4674.5
9/2/2003 2003 9 2 94 74 93 83.5 51.5 4726
9/3/2003 2003 9 3 95 70 93 81.5 49.5 4775.5
9/4/2003 2003 9 4 96 75 89 82 50 4825.5
9/5/2003 2003 9 5 97 70 89 79.5 47.5 4873
9/6/2003 2003 9 6 98 65 87 76 44 4917
9/9/2003 2003 9 9 101 68 85 76.5 44.5 4961.5
9/10/2003 2003 9 10 102 65 82 73.5 41.5 5003
9/11/2003 2003 9 11 103 55 78 66.5 34.5 5037.5
9/12/2003 2003 9 12 104 57 88 72.5 40.5 5078
9/13/2003 2003 9 13 105 63 83 73 41 5119
9/14/2003 2003 9 14 106 55 81 68 36 5155
9/15/2003 2003 9 15 107 57 90 73.5 41.5 5196.5
9/16/2003 2003 9 16 108 71 92 81.5 49.5 5246
9/17/2003 2003 9 17 109 63 88 75.5 43.5 5289.5
9/18/2003 2003 9 18 110 51 71 61 29 5318.5
9/19/2003 2003 9 19 111 50 80 65 33 5351.5
9/20/2003 2003 9 20 112 57 87 72 40 5391.5
9/21/2003 2003 9 21 113 57 85 71 39 5430.5
9/22/2003 2003 9 22 114 56 87 71.5 39.5 5470
9/23/2003 2003 9 23 115 57 91 74 42 5512
9/24/2003 2003 9 24 116 63 87 75 43 5555
9/25/2003 2003 9 25 117 60 89 74.5 42.5 5597.5
9/26/2003 2003 9 26 118 57 90 73.5 41.5 5639
9/27/2003 2003 9 27 119 61 91 76 44 5683
9/28/2003 2003 9 28 120 61 94 77.5 45.5 5728.5
9/29/2003 2003 9 29 121 63 91 77 45 5773.5
9/30/2003 2003 9 30 122 64 90 77 45 5818.5
10/1/2003 2003 10 1 123 63 89 76 44 5862.5
10/2/2003 2003 10 2 124 58 75 66.5 34.5 5897
10/3/2003 2003 10 3 125 55 61 58 26 5923
10/5/2003 2003 10 5 127 54 76 65 33 5956
10/6/2003 2003 10 6 128 56 77 66.5 34.5 5990.5
10/7/2003 2003 10 7 129 58 81 69.5 37.5 6028
10/8/2003 2003 10 8 130 59 78 68.5 36.5 6064.5
10/9/2003 2003 10 9 131 58 84 71 39 6103.5
10/10/2003 2003 10 10 132 60 82 71 39 6142.5
10/11/2003 2003 10 11 133 52 72 62 30 6172.5
10/12/2003 2003 10 12 134 49 78 63.5 31.5 6204
10/13/2003 2003 10 13 135 55 76 65.5 33.5 6237.5
10/14/2003 2003 10 14 136 46 73 59.5 27.5 6265
10/15/2003 2003 10 15 137 50 80 65 33 6298
10/16/2003 2003 10 16 138 54 82 68 36 6334
10/17/2003 2003 10 17 139 53 79 66 34 6368
10/18/2003 2003 10 18 140 53 80 66.5 34.5 6402.5
10/19/2003 2003 10 19 141 53 79 66 34 6436.5
10/20/2003 2003 10 20 142 54 82 68 36 6472.5
10/21/2003 2003 10 21 143 53 80 66.5 34.5 6507
10/22/2003 2003 10 22 144 52 79 65.5 33.5 6540.5
10/23/2003 2003 10 23 145 51 80 65.5 33.5 6574
10/24/2003 2003 10 24 146 53 77 65 33 6607
10/25/2003 2003 10 25 147 47 65 56 24 6631
10/26/2003 2003 10 26 148 43 64 53.5 21.5 6652.5
10/27/2003 2003 10 27 149 44 65 54.5 22.5 6675
10/28/2003 2003 10 28 150 48 78 63 31 6706
10/29/2003 2003 10 29 151 50 80 65 33 6739
10/30/2003 2003 10 30 152 57 72 64.5 32.5 6771.5
10/31/2003 2003 10 31 153 54 69 61.5 29.5 6801
11/1/2003 2003 11 1 154 48 66 57 25 6826
11/2/2003 2003 11 2 155 43 56 49.5 17.5 6843.5
11/3/2003 2003 11 3 156 44 57 50.5 18.5 6862
11/5/2003 2003 11 5 158 40 54 47 15 6877
11/6/2003 2003 11 6 159 37 52 44.5 12.5 6889.5
11/7/2003 2003 11 7 160 39 57 48 16 6905.5
11/8/2003 2003 11 8 161 40 58 49 17 6922.5
11/9/2003 2003 11 9 162 45 57 51 19 6941.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
11/10/2003 2003 11 10 163 44 51 47.5 15.5 6957
11/11/2003 2003 11 11 164 42 54 48 16 6973
11/12/2003 2003 11 12 165 43 51 47 15 6988
11/13/2003 2003 11 13 166 43 55 49 17 7005
11/14/2003 2003 11 14 167 38 53 45.5 13.5 7018.5
11/15/2003 2003 11 15 168 38 53 45.5 13.5 7032
11/16/2003 2003 11 16 169 40 47 43.5 11.5 7043.5
11/17/2003 2003 11 17 170 38 56 47 15 7058.5
11/18/2003 2003 11 18 171 38 55 46.5 14.5 7073
11/19/2003 2003 11 19 172 35 53 44 12 7085
11/20/2003 2003 11 20 173 36 55 45.5 13.5 7098.5
11/21/2003 2003 11 21 174 38 65 51.5 19.5 7118
11/22/2003 2003 11 22 175 27 55 41 9 7127
11/23/2003 2003 11 23 176 24 36 30 -2 7125
11/24/2003 2003 11 24 177 24 37 30.5 -1.5 7123.5
11/25/2003 2003 11 25 178 31 50 40.5 8.5 7132
11/26/2003 2003 11 26 179 31 51 41 9 7141
11/27/2003 2003 11 27 180 28 43 35.5 3.5 7144.5
11/28/2003 2003 11 28 181 27 41 34 2 7146.5
11/29/2003 2003 11 29 182 28 45 36.5 4.5 7151
11/30/2003 2003 11 30 183 31 47 39 7 7158
12/1/2003 2003 12 1 184 30 48 39 7 7165
12/2/2003 2003 12 2 185 32 52 42 10 7175
12/3/2003 2003 12 3 186 30 50 40 8 7183
12/4/2003 2003 12 4 187 29 49 39 7 7190
12/5/2003 2003 12 5 188 32 47 39.5 7.5 7197.5
12/6/2003 2003 12 6 189 33 47 40 8 7205.5
12/7/2003 2003 12 7 190 36 55 45.5 13.5 7219
12/8/2003 2003 12 8 191 35 50 42.5 10.5 7229.5
12/9/2003 2003 12 9 192 28 42 35 3 7232.5
12/10/2003 2003 12 10 193 25 43 34 2 7234.5
12/11/2003 2003 12 11 194 28 43 35.5 3.5 7238
12/12/2003 2003 12 12 195 29 46 37.5 5.5 7243.5
12/13/2003 2003 12 13 196 28 47 37.5 5.5 7249
12/14/2003 2003 12 14 197 30 50 40 8 7257
12/15/2003 2003 12 15 198 28 42 35 3 7260
12/16/2003 2003 12 16 199 21 38 29.5 -2.5 7257.5
12/17/2003 2003 12 17 200 22 39 30.5 -1.5 7256
12/18/2003 2003 12 18 201 24 41 32.5 0.5 7256.5
12/19/2003 2003 12 19 202 26 43 34.5 2.5 7259
12/20/2003 2003 12 20 203 30 45 37.5 5.5 7264.5
12/21/2003 2003 12 21 204 32 51 41.5 9.5 7274
12/22/2003 2003 12 22 205 34 51 42.5 10.5 7284.5
12/23/2003 2003 12 23 206 30 45 37.5 5.5 7290
12/24/2003 2003 12 24 207 36 46 41 9 7299
12/25/2003 2003 12 25 208 37 52 44.5 12.5 7311.5
12/26/2003 2003 12 26 209 31 50 40.5 8.5 7320
12/27/2003 2003 12 27 210 24 33 28.5 -3.5 7316.5
12/28/2003 2003 12 28 211 20 35 27.5 -4.5 7312
12/29/2003 2003 12 29 212 23 34 28.5 -3.5 7308.5
12/30/2003 2003 12 30 213 30 40 35 3 7311.5
12/31/2003 2003 12 31 214 27 41 34 2 7313.5
1/1/2004 2004 1 1 215 25 40 32.5 0.5 7314
1/2/2004 2004 1 2 216 36 43 39.5 7.5 7321.5
1/3/2004 2004 1 3 217 29 44 36.5 4.5 7326
1/4/2004 2004 1 4 218 21 33 27 -5 7321
1/5/2004 2004 1 5 219 18 32 25 -7 7314
1/6/2004 2004 1 6 220 21 32 26.5 -5.5 7308.5
1/7/2004 2004 1 7 221 28 37 32.5 0.5 7309
1/8/2004 2004 1 8 222 24 41 32.5 0.5 7309.5
1/9/2004 2004 1 9 223 26 42 34 2 7311.5
1/10/2004 2004 1 10 224 26 43 34.5 2.5 7314
1/11/2004 2004 1 11 225 26 43 34.5 2.5 7316.5
1/12/2004 2004 1 12 226 27 44 35.5 3.5 7320
1/13/2004 2004 1 13 227 27 46 36.5 4.5 7324.5
1/14/2004 2004 1 14 228 27 41 34 2 7326.5
1/15/2004 2004 1 15 229 31 43 37 5 7331.5
1/16/2004 2004 1 16 230 26 41 33.5 1.5 7333
1/17/2004 2004 1 17 231 29 47 38 6 7339
1/18/2004 2004 1 18 232 27 46 36.5 4.5 7343.5
1/19/2004 2004 1 19 233 32 43 37.5 5.5 7349
1/20/2004 2004 1 20 234 33 45 39 7 7356
1/21/2004 2004 1 21 235 28 45 36.5 4.5 7360.5
1/22/2004 2004 1 22 236 26 45 35.5 3.5 7364
1/23/2004 2004 1 23 237 26 44 35 3 7367
1/24/2004 2004 1 24 238 25 47 36 4 7371
1/25/2004 2004 1 25 239 28 45 36.5 4.5 7375.5
1/26/2004 2004 1 26 240 22 37 29.5 -2.5 7373
1/27/2004 2004 1 27 241 23 42 32.5 0.5 7373.5
1/28/2004 2004 1 28 242 31 47 39 7 7380.5
1/29/2004 2004 1 29 243 28 50 39 7 7387.5
1/30/2004 2004 1 30 244 30 52 41 9 7396.5
1/31/2004 2004 1 31 245 30 41 35.5 3.5 7400
2/1/2004 2004 2 1 246 22 37 29.5 -2.5 7397.5
2/2/2004 2004 2 2 247 23 36 29.5 -2.5 7395
2/3/2004 2004 2 3 248 31 35 33 1 7396
2/4/2004 2004 2 4 249 28 46 37 5 7401
2/5/2004 2004 2 5 250 31 44 37.5 5.5 7406.5
2/6/2004 2004 2 6 251 28 45 36.5 4.5 7411
2/7/2004 2004 2 7 252 25 42 33.5 1.5 7412.5
2/8/2004 2004 2 8 253 29 44 36.5 4.5 7417
2/9/2004 2004 2 9 254 24 42 33 1 7418
2/10/2004 2004 2 10 255 26 43 34.5 2.5 7420.5
2/11/2004 2004 2 11 256 24 44 34 2 7422.5
2/12/2004 2004 2 12 257 24 35 29.5 -2.5 7420
2/13/2004 2004 2 13 258 18 39 28.5 -3.5 7416.5
2/14/2004 2004 2 14 259 24 44 34 2 7418.5
2/15/2004 2004 2 15 260 25 49 37 5 7423.5
2/16/2004 2004 2 16 261 30 51 40.5 8.5 7432
2/17/2004 2004 2 17 262 33 52 42.5 10.5 7442.5
2/18/2004 2004 2 18 263 36 56 46 14 7456.5
2/19/2004 2004 2 19 264 40 58 49 17 7473.5
2/20/2004 2004 2 20 265 32 49 40.5 8.5 7482
2/21/2004 2004 2 21 266 38 48 43 11 7493
2/22/2004 2004 2 22 267 36 46 41 9 7502
2/23/2004 2004 2 23 268 38 46 42 10 7512
2/24/2004 2004 2 24 269 37 50 43.5 11.5 7523.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
2/25/2004 2004 2 25 270 35 51 43 11 7534.5
2/26/2004 2004 2 26 271 40 55 47.5 15.5 7550
2/27/2004 2004 2 27 272 35 46 40.5 8.5 7558.5
2/28/2004 2004 2 28 273 31 42 36.5 4.5 7563
2/29/2004 2004 2 29 274 31 48 39.5 7.5 7570.5
3/1/2004 2004 3 1 275 30 45 37.5 5.5 7576
3/3/2004 2004 3 3 277 35 53 44 12 7588
3/4/2004 2004 3 4 278 36 55 45.5 13.5 7601.5
3/5/2004 2004 3 5 279 38 54 46 14 7615.5
3/6/2004 2004 3 6 280 35 64 49.5 17.5 7633
3/7/2004 2004 3 7 281 42 63 52.5 20.5 7653.5
3/8/2004 2004 3 8 282 40 66 53 21 7674.5
3/9/2004 2004 3 9 283 53 69 61 29 7703.5
3/10/2004 2004 3 10 284 45 69 57 25 7728.5
3/11/2004 2004 3 11 285 46 68 57 25 7753.5
3/12/2004 2004 3 12 286 44 69 56.5 24.5 7778
3/13/2004 2004 3 13 287 50 71 60.5 28.5 7806.5
3/14/2004 2004 3 14 288 43 75 59 27 7833.5
3/15/2004 2004 3 15 289 53 70 61.5 29.5 7863
3/16/2004 2004 3 16 290 46 70 58 26 7889
3/17/2004 2004 3 17 291 47 71 59 27 7916
3/18/2004 2004 3 18 292 46 73 59.5 27.5 7943.5
3/19/2004 2004 3 19 293 48 79 63.5 31.5 7975
3/20/2004 2004 3 20 294 50 81 65.5 33.5 8008.5
3/21/2004 2004 3 21 295 51 79 65 33 8041.5
3/22/2004 2004 3 22 296 52 81 66.5 34.5 8076
3/23/2004 2004 3 23 297 58 78 68 36 8112
3/24/2004 2004 3 24 298 52 79 65.5 33.5 8145.5
3/25/2004 2004 3 25 299 53 79 66 34 8179.5
3/26/2004 2004 3 26 300 49 70 59.5 27.5 8207
3/27/2004 2004 3 27 301 45 65 55 23 8230
3/28/2004 2004 3 28 302 42 63 52.5 20.5 8250.5
3/29/2004 2004 3 29 303 40 69 54.5 22.5 8273
3/30/2004 2004 3 30 304 42 73 57.5 25.5 8298.5
3/31/2004 2004 3 31 305 48 80 64 32 8330.5
4/1/2004 2004 4 1 306 55 77 66 34 8364.5
4/2/2004 2004 4 2 307 46 63 54.5 22.5 8387
4/3/2004 2004 4 3 308 47 55 51 19 8406
4/4/2004 2004 4 4 309 47 58 52.5 20.5 8426.5
4/5/2004 2004 4 5 310 47 62 54.5 22.5 8449
4/6/2004 2004 4 6 311 48 68 58 26 8475
4/7/2004 2004 4 7 312 51 62 56.5 24.5 8499.5
4/8/2004 2004 4 8 313 47 67 57 25 8524.5
4/9/2004 2004 4 9 314 47 72 59.5 27.5 8552
4/10/2004 2004 4 10 315 48 60 54 22 8574
4/11/2004 2004 4 11 316 45 62 53.5 21.5 8595.5
4/12/2004 2004 4 12 317 44 71 57.5 25.5 8621
4/13/2004 2004 4 13 318 47 77 62 30 8651
4/14/2004 2004 4 14 319 53 77 65 33 8684
4/15/2004 2004 4 15 320 51 78 64.5 32.5 8716.5
4/16/2004 2004 4 16 321 56 77 66.5 34.5 8751
4/17/2004 2004 4 17 322 51 74 62.5 30.5 8781.5
4/18/2004 2004 4 18 323 44 62 53 21 8802.5
4/19/2004 2004 4 19 324 44 66 55 23 8825.5
4/20/2004 2004 4 20 325 45 71 58 26 8851.5
4/21/2004 2004 4 21 326 48 71 59.5 27.5 8879
4/22/2004 2004 4 22 327 49 61 55 23 8902
4/23/2004 2004 4 23 328 48 62 55 23 8925
4/24/2004 2004 4 24 329 45 72 58.5 26.5 8951.5
4/25/2004 2004 4 25 330 49 73 61 29 8980.5
4/26/2004 2004 4 26 331 49 78 63.5 31.5 9012
4/27/2004 2004 4 27 332 51 83 67 35 9047
4/28/2004 2004 4 28 333 53 83 68 36 9083
4/29/2004 2004 4 29 334 48 57 52.5 20.5 9103.5
4/30/2004 2004 4 30 335 45 64 54.5 22.5 9126
5/1/2004 2004 5 1 336 46 72 59 27 9153
5/2/2004 2004 5 2 337 50 80 65 33 9186
5/3/2004 2004 5 3 338 53 87 70 38 9224
5/4/2004 2004 5 4 339 59 91 75 43 9267
5/5/2004 2004 5 5 340 61 89 75 43 9310
5/6/2004 2004 5 6 341 59 86 72.5 40.5 9350.5
5/7/2004 2004 5 7 342 58 86 72 40 9390.5
5/8/2004 2004 5 8 343 59 88 73.5 41.5 9432
5/9/2004 2004 5 9 344 61 88 74.5 42.5 9474.5
5/10/2004 2004 5 10 345 59 87 73 41 9515.5
5/11/2004 2004 5 11 346 55 74 64.5 32.5 9548
5/12/2004 2004 5 12 347 53 71 62 30 9578
5/13/2004 2004 5 13 348 49 75 62 30 9608
5/14/2004 2004 5 14 349 51 81 66 34 9642
5/15/2004 2004 5 15 350 60 88 74 42 9684
5/16/2004 2004 5 16 351 64 87 75.5 43.5 9727.5
5/17/2004 2004 5 17 352 70 85 77.5 45.5 9773
5/18/2004 2004 5 18 353 64 87 75.5 43.5 9816.5
5/19/2004 2004 5 19 354 64 86 75 43 9859.5
5/20/2004 2004 5 20 355 67 86 76.5 44.5 9904
5/21/2004 2004 5 21 356 56 80 68 36 9940
5/22/2004 2004 5 22 357 57 77 67 35 9975
5/23/2004 2004 5 23 358 59 81 70 38 10013
5/24/2004 2004 5 24 359 58 81 69.5 37.5 10050.5
5/25/2004 2004 5 25 360 54 83 68.5 36.5 10087
5/26/2004 2004 5 26 361 55 82 68.5 36.5 10123.5
5/27/2004 2004 5 27 362 58 89 73.5 41.5 10165
5/28/2004 2004 5 28 363 63 87 75 43 10208
5/29/2004 2004 5 29 364 58 77 67.5 35.5 10243.5
5/30/2004 2004 5 30 365 55 81 68 36 10279.5
5/31/2004 2004 5 31 366 56 90 73 41 10320.5
6/1/2004 2004 6 1 1 63 94 78.5 46.5 46.5
6/2/2004 2004 6 2 2 67 96 81.5 49.5 96
6/3/2004 2004 6 3 3 70 98 84 52 148
6/4/2004 2004 6 4 4 67 97 82 50 198
6/5/2004 2004 6 5 5 67 100 83.5 51.5 249.5
6/6/2004 2004 6 6 6 70 100 85 53 302.5
6/7/2004 2004 6 7 7 68 95 81.5 49.5 352
6/8/2004 2004 6 8 8 69 93 81 49 401
6/9/2004 2004 6 9 9 62 87 74.5 42.5 443.5
6/10/2004 2004 6 10 10 54 79 66.5 34.5 478
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
6/11/2004 2004 6 11 11 56 85 70.5 38.5 516.5
6/12/2004 2004 6 12 12 62 90 76 44 560.5
6/13/2004 2004 6 13 13 65 96 80.5 48.5 609
6/14/2004 2004 6 14 14 68 98 83 51 660
6/15/2004 2004 6 15 15 70 96 83 51 711
6/16/2004 2004 6 16 16 65 92 78.5 46.5 757.5
6/17/2004 2004 6 17 17 66 89 77.5 45.5 803
6/18/2004 2004 6 18 18 64 95 79.5 47.5 850.5
6/19/2004 2004 6 19 19 68 93 80.5 48.5 899
6/20/2004 2004 6 20 20 66 93 79.5 47.5 946.5
6/21/2004 2004 6 21 21 67 90 78.5 46.5 993
6/22/2004 2004 6 22 22 61 88 74.5 42.5 1035.5
6/23/2004 2004 6 23 23 64 94 79 47 1082.5
6/24/2004 2004 6 24 24 68 96 82 50 1132.5
6/25/2004 2004 6 25 25 67 94 80.5 48.5 1181
6/26/2004 2004 6 26 26 66 91 78.5 46.5 1227.5
6/27/2004 2004 6 27 27 65 89 77 45 1272.5
6/28/2004 2004 6 28 28 69 89 79 47 1319.5
6/29/2004 2004 6 29 29 63 84 73.5 41.5 1361
6/30/2004 2004 6 30 30 61 90 75.5 43.5 1404.5
7/1/2004 2004 7 1 31 61 92 76.5 44.5 1449
7/2/2004 2004 7 2 32 65 94 79.5 47.5 1496.5
7/3/2004 2004 7 3 33 67 93 80 48 1544.5
7/4/2004 2004 7 4 34 66 95 80.5 48.5 1593
7/5/2004 2004 7 5 35 75 98 86.5 54.5 1647.5
7/6/2004 2004 7 6 36 71 100 85.5 53.5 1701
7/7/2004 2004 7 7 37 71 98 84.5 52.5 1753.5
7/8/2004 2004 7 8 38 70 97 83.5 51.5 1805
7/9/2004 2004 7 9 39 70 96 83 51 1856
7/10/2004 2004 7 10 40 68 97 82.5 50.5 1906.5
7/11/2004 2004 7 11 41 72 100 86 54 1960.5
7/12/2004 2004 7 12 42 72 102 87 55 2015.5
7/13/2004 2004 7 13 43 78 99 88.5 56.5 2072
7/14/2004 2004 7 14 44 76 99 87.5 55.5 2127.5
7/15/2004 2004 7 15 45 72 95 83.5 51.5 2179
7/16/2004 2004 7 16 46 71 98 84.5 52.5 2231.5
7/17/2004 2004 7 17 47 69 96 82.5 50.5 2282
7/18/2004 2004 7 18 48 71 94 82.5 50.5 2332.5
7/19/2004 2004 7 19 49 70 98 84 52 2384.5
7/20/2004 2004 7 20 50 72 98 85 53 2437.5
7/21/2004 2004 7 21 51 70 99 84.5 52.5 2490
7/22/2004 2004 7 22 52 77 99 88 56 2546
7/23/2004 2004 7 23 53 75 97 86 54 2600
7/24/2004 2004 7 24 54 72 95 83.5 51.5 2651.5
7/25/2004 2004 7 25 55 68 95 81.5 49.5 2701
7/26/2004 2004 7 26 56 73 95 84 52 2753
7/27/2004 2004 7 27 57 66 92 79 47 2800
7/28/2004 2004 7 28 58 62 92 77 45 2845
7/29/2004 2004 7 29 59 66 97 81.5 49.5 2894.5
7/30/2004 2004 7 30 60 71 99 85 53 2947.5
7/31/2004 2004 7 31 61 72 99 85.5 53.5 3001
8/1/2004 2004 8 1 62 75 100 87.5 55.5 3056.5
8/2/2004 2004 8 2 63 74 89 81.5 49.5 3106
8/3/2004 2004 8 3 64 68 94 81 49 3155
8/4/2004 2004 8 4 65 69 83 76 44 3199
8/5/2004 2004 8 5 66 67 90 78.5 46.5 3245.5
8/6/2004 2004 8 6 67 63 90 76.5 44.5 3290
8/7/2004 2004 8 7 68 61 91 76 44 3334
8/8/2004 2004 8 8 69 67 98 82.5 50.5 3384.5
8/9/2004 2004 8 9 70 69 100 84.5 52.5 3437
8/10/2004 2004 8 10 71 73 102 87.5 55.5 3492.5
8/11/2004 2004 8 11 72 76 100 88 56 3548.5
8/12/2004 2004 8 12 73 74 100 87 55 3603.5
8/13/2004 2004 8 13 74 71 98 84.5 52.5 3656
8/14/2004 2004 8 14 75 70 90 80 48 3704
8/15/2004 2004 8 15 76 65 86 75.5 43.5 3747.5
8/16/2004 2004 8 16 77 65 85 75 43 3790.5
8/17/2004 2004 8 17 78 64 88 76 44 3834.5
8/18/2004 2004 8 18 79 66 88 77 45 3879.5
8/19/2004 2004 8 19 80 63 84 73.5 41.5 3921
8/20/2004 2004 8 20 81 65 91 78 46 3967
8/21/2004 2004 8 21 82 64 88 76 44 4011
8/22/2004 2004 8 22 83 64 91 77.5 45.5 4056.5
8/23/2004 2004 8 23 84 68 87 77.5 45.5 4102
8/24/2004 2004 8 24 85 69 85 77 45 4147
8/25/2004 2004 8 25 86 61 89 75 43 4190
8/26/2004 2004 8 26 87 68 93 80.5 48.5 4238.5
8/27/2004 2004 8 27 88 65 85 75 43 4281.5
8/28/2004 2004 8 28 89 61 89 75 43 4324.5
8/29/2004 2004 8 29 90 63 93 78 46 4370.5
8/30/2004 2004 8 30 91 65 95 80 48 4418.5
8/31/2004 2004 8 31 92 70 96 83 51 4469.5
9/1/2004 2004 9 1 93 65 97 81 49 4518.5
9/2/2004 2004 9 2 94 66 96 81 49 4567.5
9/3/2004 2004 9 3 95 63 87 75 43 4610.5
9/4/2004 2004 9 4 96 59 75 67 35 4645.5
9/5/2004 2004 9 5 97 53 80 66.5 34.5 4680
9/6/2004 2004 9 6 98 56 86 71 39 4719
9/7/2004 2004 9 7 99 59 89 74 42 4761
9/8/2004 2004 9 8 100 62 93 77.5 45.5 4806.5
9/9/2004 2004 9 9 101 68 89 78.5 46.5 4853
9/10/2004 2004 9 10 102 65 90 77.5 45.5 4898.5
9/11/2004 2004 9 11 103 65 90 77.5 45.5 4944
9/12/2004 2004 9 12 104 60 90 75 43 4987
9/13/2004 2004 9 13 105 69 92 80.5 48.5 5035.5
9/14/2004 2004 9 14 106 65 90 77.5 45.5 5081
9/15/2004 2004 9 15 107 59 83 71 39 5120
9/16/2004 2004 9 16 108 60 89 74.5 42.5 5162.5
9/17/2004 2004 9 17 109 62 91 76.5 44.5 5207
9/18/2004 2004 9 18 110 66 89 77.5 45.5 5252.5
9/19/2004 2004 9 19 111 55 79 67 35 5287.5
9/20/2004 2004 9 20 112 55 70 62.5 30.5 5318
9/21/2004 2004 9 21 113 51 67 59 27 5345
9/22/2004 2004 9 22 114 47 67 57 25 5370
9/23/2004 2004 9 23 115 49 74 61.5 29.5 5399.5
9/24/2004 2004 9 24 116 51 79 65 33 5432.5
9/25/2004 2004 9 25 117 56 80 68 36 5468.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
9/26/2004 2004 9 26 118 59 80 69.5 37.5 5506
9/27/2004 2004 9 27 119 56 84 70 38 5544
9/28/2004 2004 9 28 120 57 81 69 37 5581
9/29/2004 2004 9 29 121 52 66 59 27 5608
9/30/2004 2004 9 30 122 49 67 58 26 5634
10/1/2004 2004 10 1 123 52 74 63 31 5665
10/2/2004 2004 10 2 124 53 76 64.5 32.5 5697.5
10/3/2004 2004 10 3 125 56 76 66 34 5731.5
10/4/2004 2004 10 4 126 53 78 65.5 33.5 5765
10/5/2004 2004 10 5 127 52 70 61 29 5794
10/6/2004 2004 10 6 128 52 74 63 31 5825
10/7/2004 2004 10 7 129 51 77 64 32 5857
10/8/2004 2004 10 8 130 53 79 66 34 5891
10/9/2004 2004 10 9 131 51 81 66 34 5925
10/10/2004 2004 10 10 132 59 69 64 32 5957
10/11/2004 2004 10 11 133 53 69 61 29 5986
10/12/2004 2004 10 12 134 49 73 61 29 6015
10/13/2004 2004 10 13 135 52 70 61 29 6044
10/14/2004 2004 10 14 136 47 72 59.5 27.5 6071.5
10/15/2004 2004 10 15 137 49 79 64 32 6103.5
10/16/2004 2004 10 16 138 52 74 63 31 6134.5
10/17/2004 2004 10 17 139 52 69 60.5 28.5 6163
10/18/2004 2004 10 18 140 52 63 57.5 25.5 6188.5
10/19/2004 2004 10 19 141 54 66 60 28 6216.5
10/20/2004 2004 10 20 142 55 71 63 31 6247.5
10/21/2004 2004 10 21 143 45 56 50.5 18.5 6266
10/22/2004 2004 10 22 144 43 57 50 18 6284
10/23/2004 2004 10 23 145 40 58 49 17 6301
10/24/2004 2004 10 24 146 48 61 54.5 22.5 6323.5
10/25/2004 2004 10 25 147 45 63 54 22 6345.5
10/26/2004 2004 10 26 148 44 63 53.5 21.5 6367
10/27/2004 2004 10 27 149 42 66 54 22 6389
10/28/2004 2004 10 28 150 40 47 43.5 11.5 6400.5
10/29/2004 2004 10 29 151 36 53 44.5 12.5 6413
10/30/2004 2004 10 30 152 36 54 45 13 6426
10/31/2004 2004 10 31 153 38 54 46 14 6440
11/1/2004 2004 11 1 154 38 50 44 12 6452
11/2/2004 2004 11 2 155 31 50 40.5 8.5 6460.5
11/3/2004 2004 11 3 156 32 53 42.5 10.5 6471
11/4/2004 2004 11 4 157 33 56 44.5 12.5 6483.5
11/5/2004 2004 11 5 158 37 59 48 16 6499.5
11/6/2004 2004 11 6 159 38 60 49 17 6516.5
11/7/2004 2004 11 7 160 42 49 45.5 13.5 6530
11/8/2004 2004 11 8 161 44 54 49 17 6547
11/9/2004 2004 11 9 162 40 55 47.5 15.5 6562.5
11/10/2004 2004 11 10 163 39 55 47 15 6577.5
11/11/2004 2004 11 11 164 40 55 47.5 15.5 6593
11/12/2004 2004 11 12 165 41 51 46 14 6607
11/13/2004 2004 11 13 166 41 49 45 13 6620
11/14/2004 2004 11 14 167 38 52 45 13 6633
11/15/2004 2004 11 15 168 38 52 45 13 6646
11/16/2004 2004 11 16 169 42 56 49 17 6663
11/17/2004 2004 11 17 170 40 57 48.5 16.5 6679.5
11/18/2004 2004 11 18 171 39 57 48 16 6695.5
11/19/2004 2004 11 19 172 37 55 46 14 6709.5
11/20/2004 2004 11 20 173 37 50 43.5 11.5 6721
11/21/2004 2004 11 21 174 35 40 37.5 5.5 6726.5
11/22/2004 2004 11 22 175 38 47 42.5 10.5 6737
11/23/2004 2004 11 23 176 34 53 43.5 11.5 6748.5
11/24/2004 2004 11 24 177 34 49 41.5 9.5 6758
11/25/2004 2004 11 25 178 34 49 41.5 9.5 6767.5
11/26/2004 2004 11 26 179 38 55 46.5 14.5 6782
11/27/2004 2004 11 27 180 39 54 46.5 14.5 6796.5
11/28/2004 2004 11 28 181 30 49 39.5 7.5 6804
11/29/2004 2004 11 29 182 27 38 32.5 0.5 6804.5
11/30/2004 2004 11 30 183 21 37 29 -3 6801.5
12/1/2004 2004 12 1 184 25 39 32 0 6801.5
12/2/2004 2004 12 2 185 24 39 31.5 -0.5 6801
12/3/2004 2004 12 3 186 23 39 31 -1 6800
12/4/2004 2004 12 4 187 22 36 29 -3 6797
12/5/2004 2004 12 5 188 25 39 32 0 6797
12/6/2004 2004 12 6 189 32 43 37.5 5.5 6802.5
12/7/2004 2004 12 7 190 31 42 36.5 4.5 6807
12/8/2004 2004 12 8 191 36 44 40 8 6815
12/9/2004 2004 12 9 192 37 54 45.5 13.5 6828.5
12/10/2004 2004 12 10 193 33 51 42 10 6838.5
12/11/2004 2004 12 11 194 34 51 42.5 10.5 6849
12/12/2004 2004 12 12 195 33 50 41.5 9.5 6858.5
12/13/2004 2004 12 13 196 34 50 42 10 6868.5
12/14/2004 2004 12 14 197 32 49 40.5 8.5 6877
12/15/2004 2004 12 15 198 32 43 37.5 5.5 6882.5
12/16/2004 2004 12 16 199 30 50 40 8 6890.5
12/17/2004 2004 12 17 200 28 45 36.5 4.5 6895
12/18/2004 2004 12 18 201 27 47 37 5 6900
12/19/2004 2004 12 19 202 27 47 37 5 6905
12/20/2004 2004 12 20 203 28 47 37.5 5.5 6910.5
12/21/2004 2004 12 21 204 37 50 43.5 11.5 6922
12/22/2004 2004 12 22 205 28 41 34.5 2.5 6924.5
12/23/2004 2004 12 23 206 22 37 29.5 -2.5 6922
12/24/2004 2004 12 24 207 20 36 28 -4 6918
12/25/2004 2004 12 25 208 23 40 31.5 -0.5 6917.5
12/26/2004 2004 12 26 209 24 38 31 -1 6916.5
12/27/2004 2004 12 27 210 31 40 35.5 3.5 6920
12/28/2004 2004 12 28 211 32 47 39.5 7.5 6927.5
12/29/2004 2004 12 29 212 37 54 45.5 13.5 6941
12/30/2004 2004 12 30 213 35 49 42 10 6951
12/31/2004 2004 12 31 214 35 46 40.5 8.5 6959.5
1/1/2005 2005 1 1 215 36 46 41 9 6968.5
1/2/2005 2005 1 2 216 30 43 36.5 4.5 6973
1/3/2005 2005 1 3 217 30 43 36.5 4.5 6977.5
1/4/2005 2005 1 4 218 32 39 35.5 3.5 6981
1/5/2005 2005 1 5 219 30 39 34.5 2.5 6983.5
1/6/2005 2005 1 6 220 27 39 33 1 6984.5
1/7/2005 2005 1 7 221 21 34 27.5 -4.5 6980
1/8/2005 2005 1 8 222 37 48 42.5 10.5 6990.5
1/9/2005 2005 1 9 223 50 54 52 20 7010.5
1/10/2005 2005 1 10 224 43 57 50 18 7028.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
1/11/2005 2005 1 11 225 43 54 48.5 16.5 7045
1/12/2005 2005 1 12 226 32 43 37.5 5.5 7050.5
1/13/2005 2005 1 13 227 21 45 33 1 7051.5
1/14/2005 2005 1 14 228 25 43 34 2 7053.5
1/15/2005 2005 1 15 229 23 45 34 2 7055.5
1/16/2005 2005 1 16 230 25 45 35 3 7058.5
1/17/2005 2005 1 17 231 27 48 37.5 5.5 7064
1/18/2005 2005 1 18 232 25 50 37.5 5.5 7069.5
1/19/2005 2005 1 19 233 25 52 38.5 6.5 7076
1/20/2005 2005 1 20 234 27 54 40.5 8.5 7084.5
1/21/2005 2005 1 21 235 27 54 40.5 8.5 7093
1/22/2005 2005 1 22 236 25 55 40 8 7101
1/23/2005 2005 1 23 237 25 55 40 8 7109
1/24/2005 2005 1 24 238 21 54 37.5 5.5 7114.5
1/25/2005 2005 1 25 239 23 52 37.5 5.5 7120
1/26/2005 2005 1 26 240 30 46 38 6 7126
1/27/2005 2005 1 27 241 37 45 41 9 7135
1/28/2005 2005 1 28 242 34 50 42 10 7145
1/29/2005 2005 1 29 243 28 50 39 7 7152
1/30/2005 2005 1 30 244 39 39 39 7 7159
1/31/2005 2005 1 31 245 27 48 37.5 5.5 7164.5
2/1/2005 2005 2 1 246 23 45 34 2 7166.5
2/2/2005 2005 2 2 247 28 48 38 6 7172.5
2/3/2005 2005 2 3 248 25 52 38.5 6.5 7179
2/4/2005 2005 2 4 249 18 50 34 2 7181
2/5/2005 2005 2 5 250 19 48 33.5 1.5 7182.5
2/6/2005 2005 2 6 251 19 50 34.5 2.5 7185
2/7/2005 2005 2 7 252 39 48 43.5 11.5 7196.5
2/8/2005 2005 2 8 253 25 48 36.5 4.5 7201
2/9/2005 2005 2 9 254 16 45 30.5 -1.5 7199.5
2/10/2005 2005 2 10 255 19 45 32 0 7199.5
2/11/2005 2005 2 11 256 30 41 35.5 3.5 7203
2/12/2005 2005 2 12 257 32 45 38.5 6.5 7209.5
2/13/2005 2005 2 13 258 25 54 39.5 7.5 7217
2/14/2005 2005 2 14 259 30 61 45.5 13.5 7230.5
2/15/2005 2005 2 15 260 27 55 41 9 7239.5
2/16/2005 2005 2 16 261 39 46 42.5 10.5 7250
2/17/2005 2005 2 17 262 34 52 43 11 7261
2/18/2005 2005 2 18 263 30 45 37.5 5.5 7266.5
2/19/2005 2005 2 19 264 36 55 45.5 13.5 7280
2/20/2005 2005 2 20 265 36 57 46.5 14.5 7294.5
2/21/2005 2005 2 21 266 27 54 40.5 8.5 7303
2/22/2005 2005 2 22 267 39 55 47 15 7318
2/23/2005 2005 2 23 268 39 46 42.5 10.5 7328.5
2/24/2005 2005 2 24 269 32 54 43 11 7339.5
2/25/2005 2005 2 25 270 36 50 43 11 7350.5
2/26/2005 2005 2 26 271 34 55 44.5 12.5 7363
2/27/2005 2005 2 27 272 28 59 43.5 11.5 7374.5
2/28/2005 2005 2 28 273 28 43 35.5 3.5 7378
3/1/2005 2005 3 1 274 34 57 45.5 13.5 7391.5
3/2/2005 2005 3 2 275 25 55 40 8 7399.5
3/3/2005 2005 3 3 276 39 55 47 15 7414.5
3/4/2005 2005 3 4 277 27 57 42 10 7424.5
3/5/2005 2005 3 5 278 32 61 46.5 14.5 7439
3/6/2005 2005 3 6 279 37 66 51.5 19.5 7458.5
3/7/2005 2005 3 7 280 30 66 48 16 7474.5
3/8/2005 2005 3 8 281 37 66 51.5 19.5 7494
3/9/2005 2005 3 9 282 34 73 53.5 21.5 7515.5
3/10/2005 2005 3 10 283 32 70 51 19 7534.5
3/11/2005 2005 3 11 284 32 70 51 19 7553.5
3/12/2005 2005 3 12 285 30 75 52.5 20.5 7574
3/13/2005 2005 3 13 286 37 54 45.5 13.5 7587.5
3/14/2005 2005 3 14 287 30 45 37.5 5.5 7593
3/15/2005 2005 3 15 288 19 52 35.5 3.5 7596.5
3/16/2005 2005 3 16 289 25 57 41 9 7605.5
3/17/2005 2005 3 17 290 30 64 47 15 7620.5
3/18/2005 2005 3 18 291 36 64 50 18 7638.5
3/19/2005 2005 3 19 292 34 57 45.5 13.5 7652
3/20/2005 2005 3 20 293 43 52 47.5 15.5 7667.5
3/21/2005 2005 3 21 294 36 57 46.5 14.5 7682
3/22/2005 2005 3 22 295 28 63 45.5 13.5 7695.5
3/23/2005 2005 3 23 296 46 55 50.5 18.5 7714
3/24/2005 2005 3 24 297 45 59 52 20 7734
3/25/2005 2005 3 25 298 39 63 51 19 7753
3/26/2005 2005 3 26 299 36 54 45 13 7766
3/27/2005 2005 3 27 300 28 64 46 14 7780
3/28/2005 2005 3 28 301 48 64 56 24 7804
3/29/2005 2005 3 29 302 43 55 49 17 7821
3/30/2005 2005 3 30 303 37 48 42.5 10.5 7831.5
3/31/2005 2005 3 31 304 32 54 43 11 7842.5
4/1/2005 2005 4 1 305 23 63 43 11 7853.5
4/2/2005 2005 4 2 306 27 73 50 18 7871.5
4/3/2005 2005 4 3 307 43 72 57.5 25.5 7897
4/4/2005 2005 4 4 308 45 66 55.5 23.5 7920.5
4/5/2005 2005 4 5 309 39 64 51.5 19.5 7940
4/6/2005 2005 4 6 310 32 66 49 17 7957
4/7/2005 2005 4 7 311 36 75 55.5 23.5 7980.5
4/8/2005 2005 4 8 312 50 64 57 25 8005.5
4/9/2005 2005 4 9 313 43 50 46.5 14.5 8020
4/10/2005 2005 4 10 314 39 59 49 17 8037
4/11/2005 2005 4 11 315 39 64 51.5 19.5 8056.5
4/12/2005 2005 4 12 316 34 70 52 20 8076.5
4/13/2005 2005 4 13 317 34 75 54.5 22.5 8099
4/14/2005 2005 4 14 318 50 72 61 29 8128
4/15/2005 2005 4 15 319 36 77 56.5 24.5 8152.5
4/16/2005 2005 4 16 320 37 79 58 26 8178.5
4/17/2005 2005 4 17 321 64 81 72.5 40.5 8219
4/18/2005 2005 4 18 322 64 79 71.5 39.5 8258.5
4/19/2005 2005 4 19 323 48 73 60.5 28.5 8287
4/20/2005 2005 4 20 324 39 55 47 15 8302
4/21/2005 2005 4 21 325 30 61 45.5 13.5 8315.5
4/22/2005 2005 4 22 326 36 68 52 20 8335.5
4/23/2005 2005 4 23 327 36 77 56.5 24.5 8360
4/24/2005 2005 4 24 328 52 63 57.5 25.5 8385.5
4/25/2005 2005 4 25 329 46 64 55 23 8408.5
4/26/2005 2005 4 26 330 43 73 58 26 8434.5
4/27/2005 2005 4 27 331 43 64 53.5 21.5 8456
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
4/28/2005 2005 4 28 332 52 63 57.5 25.5 8481.5
4/29/2005 2005 4 29 333 43 63 53 21 8502.5
4/30/2005 2005 4 30 334 37 64 50.5 18.5 8521
5/1/2005 2005 5 1 335 46 57 51.5 19.5 8540.5
5/2/2005 2005 5 2 336 37 64 50.5 18.5 8559
5/3/2005 2005 5 3 337 43 70 56.5 24.5 8583.5
5/4/2005 2005 5 4 338 43 75 59 27 8610.5
5/5/2005 2005 5 5 339 52 77 64.5 32.5 8643
5/6/2005 2005 5 6 340 46 72 59 27 8670
5/7/2005 2005 5 7 341 50 66 58 26 8696
5/8/2005 2005 5 8 342 45 75 60 28 8724
5/9/2005 2005 5 9 343 45 81 63 31 8755
5/10/2005 2005 5 10 344 50 68 59 27 8782
5/11/2005 2005 5 11 345 45 66 55.5 23.5 8805.5
5/12/2005 2005 5 12 346 46 72 59 27 8832.5
5/13/2005 2005 5 13 347 52 75 63.5 31.5 8864
5/14/2005 2005 5 14 348 45 81 63 31 8895
5/15/2005 2005 5 15 349 48 88 68 36 8931
5/16/2005 2005 5 16 350 55 84 69.5 37.5 8968.5
5/17/2005 2005 5 17 351 46 75 60.5 28.5 8997
5/18/2005 2005 5 18 352 45 86 65.5 33.5 9030.5
5/19/2005 2005 5 19 353 50 93 71.5 39.5 9070
5/20/2005 2005 5 20 354 54 97 75.5 43.5 9113.5
5/21/2005 2005 5 21 355 61 97 79 47 9160.5
5/22/2005 2005 5 22 356 55 100 77.5 45.5 9206
5/23/2005 2005 5 23 357 55 100 77.5 45.5 9251.5
5/24/2005 2005 5 24 358 52 95 73.5 41.5 9293
5/25/2005 2005 5 25 359 64 90 77 45 9338
5/26/2005 2005 5 26 360 50 90 70 38 9376
5/27/2005 2005 5 27 361 52 84 68 36 9412
5/28/2005 2005 5 28 362 57 82 69.5 37.5 9449.5
5/29/2005 2005 5 29 363 64 90 77 45 9494.5
5/30/2005 2005 5 30 364 61 79 70 38 9532.5
5/31/2005 2005 5 31 365 45 73 59 27 9559.5
6/1/2005 2005 6 1 1 46 90 68 36 36
6/2/2005 2005 6 2 2 59 75 67 35 71
6/3/2005 2005 6 3 3 46 57 51.5 19.5 90.5
6/4/2005 2005 6 4 4 45 75 60 28 118.5
6/5/2005 2005 6 5 5 61 84 72.5 40.5 159
6/6/2005 2005 6 6 6 64 84 74 42 201
6/7/2005 2005 6 7 7 57 81 69 37 238
6/8/2005 2005 6 8 8 46 82 64 32 270
6/9/2005 2005 6 9 9 57 79 68 36 306
6/10/2005 2005 6 10 10 52 81 66.5 34.5 340.5
6/11/2005 2005 6 11 11 55 66 60.5 28.5 369
6/12/2005 2005 6 12 12 52 79 65.5 33.5 402.5
6/13/2005 2005 6 13 13 46 84 65 33 435.5
6/14/2005 2005 6 14 14 48 90 69 37 472.5
6/15/2005 2005 6 15 15 57 97 77 45 517.5
6/16/2005 2005 6 16 16 54 93 73.5 41.5 559
6/17/2005 2005 6 17 17 81 95 88 56 615
6/18/2005 2005 6 18 18 75 95 85 53 668
6/19/2005 2005 6 19 19 72 95 83.5 51.5 719.5
6/20/2005 2005 6 20 20 54 100 77 45 764.5
6/21/2005 2005 6 21 21 57 100 78.5 46.5 811
6/22/2005 2005 6 22 22 66 93 79.5 47.5 858.5
6/23/2005 2005 6 23 23 61 90 75.5 43.5 902
6/24/2005 2005 6 24 24 55 77 66 34 936
6/25/2005 2005 6 25 25 57 86 71.5 39.5 975.5
6/26/2005 2005 6 26 26 57 93 75 43 1018.5
6/27/2005 2005 6 27 27 52 91 71.5 39.5 1058
6/28/2005 2005 6 28 28 66 90 78 46 1104
6/29/2005 2005 6 29 29 52 90 71 39 1143
6/30/2005 2005 6 30 30 54 97 75.5 43.5 1186.5
7/1/2005 2005 7 1 31 57 100 78.5 46.5 1233
7/2/2005 2005 7 2 32 55 102 78.5 46.5 1279.5
7/3/2005 2005 7 3 33 61 95 78 46 1325.5
7/4/2005 2005 7 4 34 57 93 75 43 1368.5
7/5/2005 2005 7 5 35 59 100 79.5 47.5 1416
7/6/2005 2005 7 6 36 55 100 77.5 45.5 1461.5
7/7/2005 2005 7 7 37 54 102 78 46 1507.5
7/8/2005 2005 7 8 38 54 102 78 46 1553.5
7/9/2005 2005 7 9 39 55 95 75 43 1596.5
7/10/2005 2005 7 10 40 57 100 78.5 46.5 1643
7/11/2005 2005 7 11 41 72 102 87 55 1698
7/12/2005 2005 7 12 42 63 108 85.5 53.5 1751.5
7/13/2005 2005 7 13 43 64 109 86.5 54.5 1806
7/14/2005 2005 7 14 44 86 111 98.5 66.5 1872.5
7/15/2005 2005 7 15 45 66 108 87 55 1927.5
7/16/2005 2005 7 16 46 72 108 90 58 1985.5
7/17/2005 2005 7 17 47 66 106 86 54 2039.5
7/18/2005 2005 7 18 48 63 104 83.5 51.5 2091
7/19/2005 2005 7 19 49 61 108 84.5 52.5 2143.5
7/20/2005 2005 7 20 50 70 108 89 57 2200.5
7/21/2005 2005 7 21 51 70 109 89.5 57.5 2258
7/22/2005 2005 7 22 52 82 106 94 62 2320
7/23/2005 2005 7 23 53 77 100 88.5 56.5 2376.5
7/24/2005 2005 7 24 54 72 90 81 49 2425.5
7/25/2005 2005 7 25 55 70 97 83.5 51.5 2477
7/26/2005 2005 7 26 56 61 95 78 46 2523
7/27/2005 2005 7 27 57 61 100 80.5 48.5 2571.5
7/28/2005 2005 7 28 58 55 106 80.5 48.5 2620
7/29/2005 2005 7 29 59 57 108 82.5 50.5 2670.5
7/30/2005 2005 7 30 60 66 97 81.5 49.5 2720
7/31/2005 2005 7 31 61 72 99 85.5 53.5 2773.5
8/1/2005 2005 8 1 62 75 86 80.5 48.5 2822
8/2/2005 2005 8 2 63 66 93 79.5 47.5 2869.5
8/3/2005 2005 8 3 64 63 91 77 45 2914.5
8/4/2005 2005 8 4 65 66 88 77 45 2959.5
8/5/2005 2005 8 5 66 64 91 77.5 45.5 3005
8/6/2005 2005 8 6 67 61 90 75.5 43.5 3048.5
8/7/2005 2005 8 7 68 61 97 79 47 3095.5
8/8/2005 2005 8 8 69 72 95 83.5 51.5 3147
8/9/2005 2005 8 9 70 73 91 82 50 3197
8/10/2005 2005 8 10 71 70 81 75.5 43.5 3240.5
8/11/2005 2005 8 11 72 64 90 77 45 3285.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
8/12/2005 2005 8 12 73 66 91 78.5 46.5 3332
8/13/2005 2005 8 13 74 66 90 78 46 3378
8/14/2005 2005 8 14 75 55 95 75 43 3421
8/15/2005 2005 8 15 76 61 90 75.5 43.5 3464.5
8/16/2005 2005 8 16 77 64 88 76 44 3508.5
8/17/2005 2005 8 17 78 55 90 72.5 40.5 3549
8/18/2005 2005 8 18 79 52 90 71 39 3588
8/19/2005 2005 8 19 80 54 84 69 37 3625
8/20/2005 2005 8 20 81 61 91 76 44 3669
8/21/2005 2005 8 21 82 57 95 76 44 3713
8/22/2005 2005 8 22 83 57 88 72.5 40.5 3753.5
8/23/2005 2005 8 23 84 61 90 75.5 43.5 3797
8/24/2005 2005 8 24 85 54 82 68 36 3833
8/25/2005 2005 8 25 86 68 95 81.5 49.5 3882.5
8/26/2005 2005 8 26 87 61 99 80 48 3930.5
8/27/2005 2005 8 27 88 57 93 75 43 3973.5
8/28/2005 2005 8 28 89 59 91 75 43 4016.5
8/29/2005 2005 8 29 90 54 100 77 45 4061.5
8/30/2005 2005 8 30 91 55 95 75 43 4104.5
8/31/2005 2005 8 31 92 45 90 67.5 35.5 4140
9/1/2005 2005 9 1 93 46 90 68 36 4176
9/2/2005 2005 9 2 94 50 90 70 38 4214
9/3/2005 2005 9 3 95 61 81 71 39 4253
9/4/2005 2005 9 4 96 55 81 68 36 4289
9/5/2005 2005 9 5 97 55 95 75 43 4332
9/6/2005 2005 9 6 98 63 95 79 47 4379
9/7/2005 2005 9 7 99 61 95 78 46 4425
9/8/2005 2005 9 8 100 64 82 73 41 4466
9/9/2005 2005 9 9 101 61 75 68 36 4502
9/10/2005 2005 9 10 102 57 84 70.5 38.5 4540.5
9/11/2005 2005 9 11 103 61 86 73.5 41.5 4582
9/12/2005 2005 9 12 104 63 82 72.5 40.5 4622.5
9/13/2005 2005 9 13 105 48 81 64.5 32.5 4655
9/14/2005 2005 9 14 106 46 79 62.5 30.5 4685.5
9/15/2005 2005 9 15 107 45 84 64.5 32.5 4718
9/16/2005 2005 9 16 108 45 84 64.5 32.5 4750.5
9/17/2005 2005 9 17 109 45 86 65.5 33.5 4784
9/18/2005 2005 9 18 110 50 88 69 37 4821
9/19/2005 2005 9 19 111 45 88 66.5 34.5 4855.5
9/20/2005 2005 9 20 112 46 81 63.5 31.5 4887
9/21/2005 2005 9 21 113 55 84 69.5 37.5 4924.5
9/22/2005 2005 9 22 114 54 79 66.5 34.5 4959
9/23/2005 2005 9 23 115 52 82 67 35 4994
9/24/2005 2005 9 24 116 63 93 78 46 5040
9/25/2005 2005 9 25 117 48 82 65 33 5073
9/26/2005 2005 9 26 118 45 84 64.5 32.5 5105.5
9/27/2005 2005 9 27 119 52 82 67 35 5140.5
9/28/2005 2005 9 28 120 55 61 58 26 5166.5
9/29/2005 2005 9 29 121 46 75 60.5 28.5 5195
9/30/2005 2005 9 30 122 46 79 62.5 30.5 5225.5
10/1/2005 2005 10 1 123 43 84 63.5 31.5 5257
10/2/2005 2005 10 2 124 72 88 80 48 5305
10/3/2005 2005 10 3 125 64 79 71.5 39.5 5344.5
10/4/2005 2005 10 4 126 52 72 62 30 5374.5
10/5/2005 2005 10 5 127 36 63 49.5 17.5 5392
10/6/2005 2005 10 6 128 34 68 51 19 5411
10/7/2005 2005 10 7 129 32 75 53.5 21.5 5432.5
10/8/2005 2005 10 8 130 37 73 55 23 5455.5
10/9/2005 2005 10 9 131 48 66 57 25 5480.5
10/10/2005 2005 10 10 132 39 59 49 17 5497.5
10/11/2005 2005 10 11 133 37 66 51.5 19.5 5517
10/12/2005 2005 10 12 134 43 72 57.5 25.5 5542.5
10/13/2005 2005 10 13 135 36 72 54 22 5564.5
10/14/2005 2005 10 14 136 36 75 55.5 23.5 5588
10/15/2005 2005 10 15 137 36 75 55.5 23.5 5611.5
10/16/2005 2005 10 16 138 46 64 55 23 5634.5
10/17/2005 2005 10 17 139 39 70 54.5 22.5 5657
10/18/2005 2005 10 18 140 45 61 53 21 5678
10/19/2005 2005 10 19 141 43 64 53.5 21.5 5699.5
10/20/2005 2005 10 20 142 50 66 58 26 5725.5
10/21/2005 2005 10 21 143 43 64 53.5 21.5 5747
10/22/2005 2005 10 22 144 39 70 54.5 22.5 5769.5
10/23/2005 2005 10 23 145 41 73 57 25 5794.5
10/24/2005 2005 10 24 146 39 73 56 24 5818.5
10/25/2005 2005 10 25 147 41 73 57 25 5843.5
10/26/2005 2005 10 26 148 39 68 53.5 21.5 5865
10/27/2005 2005 10 27 149 39 66 52.5 20.5 5885.5
10/28/2005 2005 10 28 150 45 63 54 22 5907.5
10/29/2005 2005 10 29 151 37 66 51.5 19.5 5927
10/30/2005 2005 10 30 152 43 61 52 20 5947
10/31/2005 2005 10 31 153 34 61 47.5 15.5 5962.5
11/1/2005 2005 11 1 154 32 61 46.5 14.5 5977
11/2/2005 2005 11 2 155 32 55 43.5 11.5 5988.5
11/3/2005 2005 11 3 156 61 72 66.5 34.5 6023
11/4/2005 2005 11 4 157 45 72 58.5 26.5 6049.5
11/5/2005 2005 11 5 158 34 57 45.5 13.5 6063
11/6/2005 2005 11 6 159 28 64 46 14 6077
11/7/2005 2005 11 7 160 45 66 55.5 23.5 6100.5
11/8/2005 2005 11 8 161 43 70 56.5 24.5 6125
11/9/2005 2005 11 9 162 36 57 46.5 14.5 6139.5
11/10/2005 2005 11 10 163 37 61 49 17 6156.5
11/11/2005 2005 11 11 164 41 59 50 18 6174.5
11/12/2005 2005 11 12 165 37 63 50 18 6192.5
11/13/2005 2005 11 13 166 30 55 42.5 10.5 6203
11/14/2005 2005 11 14 167 34 63 48.5 16.5 6219.5
11/15/2005 2005 11 15 168 28 45 36.5 4.5 6224
11/16/2005 2005 11 16 169 19 45 32 0 6224
11/17/2005 2005 11 17 170 21 54 37.5 5.5 6229.5
11/18/2005 2005 11 18 171 21 54 37.5 5.5 6235
11/19/2005 2005 11 19 172 23 39 31 -1 6234
11/20/2005 2005 11 20 173 19 55 37 5 6239
11/21/2005 2005 11 21 174 18 34 26 -6 6233
11/22/2005 2005 11 22 175 18 54 36 4 6237
11/23/2005 2005 11 23 176 18 52 35 3 6240
11/24/2005 2005 11 24 177 18 50 34 2 6242
11/25/2005 2005 11 25 178 16 50 33 1 6243
11/26/2005 2005 11 26 179 25 50 37.5 5.5 6248.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
11/27/2005 2005 11 27 180 25 37 31 -1 6247.5
11/28/2005 2005 11 28 181 18 39 28.5 -3.5 6244
11/29/2005 2005 11 29 182 25 39 32 0 6244
11/30/2005 2005 11 30 183 19 48 33.5 1.5 6245.5
12/1/2005 2005 12 1 184 25 43 34 2 6247.5
12/2/2005 2005 12 2 185 30 57 43.5 11.5 6259
12/3/2005 2005 12 3 186 28 43 35.5 3.5 6262.5
12/4/2005 2005 12 4 187 23 39 31 -1 6261.5
12/5/2005 2005 12 5 188 10 34 22 -10 6251.5
12/6/2005 2005 12 6 189 -8 43 17.5 -14.5 6237
12/7/2005 2005 12 7 190 9 30 19.5 -12.5 6224.5
12/8/2005 2005 12 8 191 1 27 14 -18 6206.5
12/9/2005 2005 12 9 192 5 34 19.5 -12.5 6194
12/10/2005 2005 12 10 193 7 37 22 -10 6184
12/11/2005 2005 12 11 194 7 43 25 -7 6177
12/12/2005 2005 12 12 195 9 43 26 -6 6171
12/13/2005 2005 12 13 196 19 43 31 -1 6170
12/14/2005 2005 12 14 197 10 37 23.5 -8.5 6161.5
12/15/2005 2005 12 15 198 3 37 20 -12 6149.5
12/16/2005 2005 12 16 199 7 30 18.5 -13.5 6136
12/17/2005 2005 12 17 200 10 39 24.5 -7.5 6128.5
12/18/2005 2005 12 18 201 14 43 28.5 -3.5 6125
12/19/2005 2005 12 19 202 18 43 30.5 -1.5 6123.5
12/20/2005 2005 12 20 203 25 45 35 3 6126.5
12/21/2005 2005 12 21 204 14 46 30 -2 6124.5
12/22/2005 2005 12 22 205 25 50 37.5 5.5 6130
12/23/2005 2005 12 23 206 23 52 37.5 5.5 6135.5
12/24/2005 2005 12 24 207 19 32 25.5 -6.5 6129
12/25/2005 2005 12 25 208 18 45 31.5 -0.5 6128.5
12/26/2005 2005 12 26 209 19 54 36.5 4.5 6133
12/27/2005 2005 12 27 210 28 52 40 8 6141
12/28/2005 2005 12 28 211 23 48 35.5 3.5 6144.5
12/29/2005 2005 12 29 212 25 52 38.5 6.5 6151
12/30/2005 2005 12 30 213 19 37 28 -4 6147
12/31/2005 2005 12 31 214 32 54 43 11 6158
1/1/2006 2006 1 1 215 39 55 47 15 6173
1/2/2006 2006 1 2 216 43 57 50 18 6191
1/3/2006 2006 1 3 217 30 55 42.5 10.5 6201.5
1/4/2006 2006 1 4 218 25 52 38.5 6.5 6208
1/5/2006 2006 1 5 219 18 45 31.5 -0.5 6207.5
1/6/2006 2006 1 6 220 19 48 33.5 1.5 6209
1/7/2006 2006 1 7 221 18 48 33 1 6210
1/8/2006 2006 1 8 222 18 50 34 2 6212
1/9/2006 2006 1 9 223 18 39 28.5 -3.5 6208.5
1/10/2006 2006 1 10 224 9 39 24 -8 6200.5
1/11/2006 2006 1 11 225 10 45 27.5 -4.5 6196
1/12/2006 2006 1 12 226 16 45 30.5 -1.5 6194.5
1/13/2006 2006 1 13 227 12 45 28.5 -3.5 6191
1/14/2006 2006 1 14 228 18 48 33 1 6192
1/15/2006 2006 1 15 229 19 54 36.5 4.5 6196.5
1/16/2006 2006 1 16 230 21 39 30 -2 6194.5
1/17/2006 2006 1 17 231 10 39 24.5 -7.5 6187
1/18/2006 2006 1 18 232 16 52 34 2 6189
1/19/2006 2006 1 19 233 25 45 35 3 6192
1/20/2006 2006 1 20 234 16 41 28.5 -3.5 6188.5
1/21/2006 2006 1 21 235 12 43 27.5 -4.5 6184
1/22/2006 2006 1 22 236 9 36 22.5 -9.5 6174.5
1/23/2006 2006 1 23 237 3 39 21 -11 6163.5
1/24/2006 2006 1 24 238 7 45 26 -6 6157.5
1/25/2006 2006 1 25 239 10 39 24.5 -7.5 6150
1/26/2006 2006 1 26 240 27 43 35 3 6153
1/27/2006 2006 1 27 241 21 37 29 -3 6150
1/28/2006 2006 1 28 242 12 39 25.5 -6.5 6143.5
1/29/2006 2006 1 29 243 19 45 32 0 6143.5
1/30/2006 2006 1 30 244 21 45 33 1 6144.5
1/31/2006 2006 1 31 245 27 54 40.5 8.5 6153
2/1/2006 2006 2 1 246 30 55 42.5 10.5 6163.5
2/2/2006 2006 2 2 247 27 46 36.5 4.5 6168
2/3/2006 2006 2 3 248 25 54 39.5 7.5 6175.5
2/4/2006 2006 2 4 249 21 46 33.5 1.5 6177
2/5/2006 2006 2 5 250 30 46 38 6 6183
2/6/2006 2006 2 6 251 16 45 30.5 -1.5 6181.5
2/7/2006 2006 2 7 252 16 50 33 1 6182.5
2/8/2006 2006 2 8 253 14 55 34.5 2.5 6185
2/9/2006 2006 2 9 254 16 57 36.5 4.5 6189.5
2/10/2006 2006 2 10 255 18 45 31.5 -0.5 6189
2/11/2006 2006 2 11 256 9 39 24 -8 6181
2/12/2006 2006 2 12 257 9 50 29.5 -2.5 6178.5
2/13/2006 2006 2 13 258 12 28 20 -12 6166.5
2/14/2006 2006 2 14 259 19 52 35.5 3.5 6170
2/15/2006 2006 2 15 260 32 61 46.5 14.5 6184.5
2/16/2006 2006 2 16 261 19 41 30 -2 6182.5
2/17/2006 2006 2 17 262 18 46 32 0 6182.5
2/18/2006 2006 2 18 263 10 52 31 -1 6181.5
2/19/2006 2006 2 19 264 28 45 36.5 4.5 6186
2/20/2006 2006 2 20 265 21 41 31 -1 6185
2/21/2006 2006 2 21 266 10 48 29 -3 6182
2/22/2006 2006 2 22 267 16 54 35 3 6185
2/23/2006 2006 2 23 268 16 48 32 0 6185
2/24/2006 2006 2 24 269 16 61 38.5 6.5 6191.5
2/25/2006 2006 2 25 270 16 64 40 8 6199.5
2/26/2006 2006 2 26 271 18 54 36 4 6203.5
2/27/2006 2006 2 27 272 25 68 46.5 14.5 6218
2/28/2006 2006 2 28 273 55 63 59 27 6245
3/1/2006 2006 3 1 274 39 57 48 16 6261
3/2/2006 2006 3 2 275 27 64 45.5 13.5 6274.5
3/3/2006 2006 3 3 276 27 66 46.5 14.5 6289
3/4/2006 2006 3 4 277 50 63 56.5 24.5 6313.5
3/5/2006 2006 3 5 278 25 64 44.5 12.5 6326
3/6/2006 2006 3 6 279 39 64 51.5 19.5 6345.5
3/7/2006 2006 3 7 280 45 61 53 21 6366.5
3/8/2006 2006 3 8 281 36 50 43 11 6377.5
3/9/2006 2006 3 9 282 30 54 42 10 6387.5
3/10/2006 2006 3 10 283 21 34 27.5 -4.5 6383
3/11/2006 2006 3 11 284 27 39 33 1 6384
3/12/2006 2006 3 12 285 19 41 30 -2 6382
3/13/2006 2006 3 13 286 30 45 37.5 5.5 6387.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
3/14/2006 2006 3 14 287 27 52 39.5 7.5 6395
3/15/2006 2006 3 15 288 30 52 41 9 6404
3/16/2006 2006 3 16 289 23 55 39 7 6411
3/17/2006 2006 3 17 290 34 57 45.5 13.5 6424.5
3/18/2006 2006 3 18 291 41 50 45.5 13.5 6438
3/19/2006 2006 3 19 292 37 48 42.5 10.5 6448.5
3/20/2006 2006 3 20 293 27 57 42 10 6458.5
3/21/2006 2006 3 21 294 39 50 44.5 12.5 6471
3/22/2006 2006 3 22 295 34 59 46.5 14.5 6485.5
3/23/2006 2006 3 23 296 28 61 44.5 12.5 6498
3/24/2006 2006 3 24 297 28 64 46 14 6512
3/25/2006 2006 3 25 298 36 72 54 22 6534
3/26/2006 2006 3 26 299 39 57 48 16 6550
3/27/2006 2006 3 27 300 27 61 44 12 6562
3/28/2006 2006 3 28 301 43 57 50 18 6580
3/29/2006 2006 3 29 302 39 54 46.5 14.5 6594.5
3/30/2006 2006 3 30 303 34 57 45.5 13.5 6608
3/31/2006 2006 3 31 304 36 55 45.5 13.5 6621.5
4/1/2006 2006 4 1 305 45 81 63 31 6652.5
4/2/2006 2006 4 2 306 32 63 47.5 15.5 6668
4/3/2006 2006 4 3 307 43 72 57.5 25.5 6693.5
4/4/2006 2006 4 4 308 50 73 61.5 29.5 6723
4/5/2006 2006 4 5 309 43 57 50 18 6741
4/6/2006 2006 4 6 310 36 57 46.5 14.5 6755.5
4/7/2006 2006 4 7 311 34 68 51 19 6774.5
4/8/2006 2006 4 8 312 36 75 55.5 23.5 6798
4/9/2006 2006 4 9 313 43 81 62 30 6828
4/10/2006 2006 4 10 314 55 72 63.5 31.5 6859.5
4/11/2006 2006 4 11 315 45 70 57.5 25.5 6885
4/12/2006 2006 4 12 316 50 81 65.5 33.5 6918.5
4/13/2006 2006 4 13 317 43 82 62.5 30.5 6949
4/14/2006 2006 4 14 318 61 64 62.5 30.5 6979.5
4/15/2006 2006 4 15 319 54 70 62 30 7009.5
4/16/2006 2006 4 16 320 54 75 64.5 32.5 7042
4/17/2006 2006 4 17 321 41 68 54.5 22.5 7064.5
4/18/2006 2006 4 18 322 43 61 52 20 7084.5
4/19/2006 2006 4 19 323 28 57 42.5 10.5 7095
4/20/2006 2006 4 20 324 36 70 53 21 7116
4/21/2006 2006 4 21 325 45 79 62 30 7146
4/22/2006 2006 4 22 326 39 86 62.5 30.5 7176.5
4/23/2006 2006 4 23 327 46 79 62.5 30.5 7207
4/24/2006 2006 4 24 328 52 66 59 27 7234
4/25/2006 2006 4 25 329 37 73 55 23 7257
4/26/2006 2006 4 26 330 37 79 58 26 7283
4/27/2006 2006 4 27 331 43 84 63.5 31.5 7314.5
4/28/2006 2006 4 28 332 45 73 59 27 7341.5
4/29/2006 2006 4 29 333 36 75 55.5 23.5 7365
4/30/2006 2006 4 30 334 48 77 62.5 30.5 7395.5
5/1/2006 2006 5 1 335 41 82 61.5 29.5 7425
5/2/2006 2006 5 2 336 61 75 68 36 7461
5/3/2006 2006 5 3 337 46 84 65 33 7494
5/4/2006 2006 5 4 338 52 72 62 30 7524
5/5/2006 2006 5 5 339 50 73 61.5 29.5 7553.5
5/6/2006 2006 5 6 340 43 77 60 28 7581.5
5/7/2006 2006 5 7 341 72 81 76.5 44.5 7626
5/8/2006 2006 5 8 342 52 73 62.5 30.5 7656.5
5/9/2006 2006 5 9 343 55 73 64 32 7688.5
5/10/2006 2006 5 10 344 41 75 58 26 7714.5
5/11/2006 2006 5 11 345 37 81 59 27 7741.5
5/12/2006 2006 5 12 346 41 90 65.5 33.5 7775
5/13/2006 2006 5 13 347 52 93 72.5 40.5 7815.5
5/14/2006 2006 5 14 348 54 91 72.5 40.5 7856
5/15/2006 2006 5 15 349 55 88 71.5 39.5 7895.5
5/16/2006 2006 5 16 350 50 88 69 37 7932.5
5/17/2006 2006 5 17 351 48 97 72.5 40.5 7973
5/18/2006 2006 5 18 352 54 93 73.5 41.5 8014.5
5/19/2006 2006 5 19 353 61 91 76 44 8058.5
5/20/2006 2006 5 20 354 55 93 74 42 8100.5
5/21/2006 2006 5 21 355 55 95 75 43 8143.5
5/22/2006 2006 5 22 356 64 84 74 42 8185.5
5/23/2006 2006 5 23 357 55 81 68 36 8221.5
5/24/2006 2006 5 24 358 48 91 69.5 37.5 8259
5/25/2006 2006 5 25 359 52 95 73.5 41.5 8300.5
5/26/2006 2006 5 26 360 54 91 72.5 40.5 8341
5/27/2006 2006 5 27 361 66 79 72.5 40.5 8381.5
5/28/2006 2006 5 28 362 45 70 57.5 25.5 8407
5/29/2006 2006 5 29 363 36 84 60 28 8435
5/30/2006 2006 5 30 364 75 84 79.5 47.5 8482.5
5/31/2006 2006 5 31 365 45 90 67.5 35.5 8518
6/1/2006 2006 6 1 1 48 90 69 37 37
6/2/2006 2006 6 2 2 50 102 76 44 81
6/3/2006 2006 6 3 3 55 99 77 45 126
6/4/2006 2006 6 4 4 52 100 76 44 170
6/5/2006 2006 6 5 5 61 106 83.5 51.5 221.5
6/6/2006 2006 6 6 6 61 106 83.5 51.5 273
6/7/2006 2006 6 7 7 75 99 87 55 328
6/8/2006 2006 6 8 8 61 82 71.5 39.5 367.5
6/9/2006 2006 6 9 9 55 88 71.5 39.5 407
6/10/2006 2006 6 10 10 63 88 75.5 43.5 450.5
6/11/2006 2006 6 11 11 72 97 84.5 52.5 503
6/12/2006 2006 6 12 12 54 99 76.5 44.5 547.5
6/13/2006 2006 6 13 13 57 79 68 36 583.5
6/14/2006 2006 6 14 14 70 91 80.5 48.5 632
6/15/2006 2006 6 15 15 57 82 69.5 37.5 669.5
6/16/2006 2006 6 16 16 52 88 70 38 707.5
6/17/2006 2006 6 17 17 50 66 58 26 733.5
6/18/2006 2006 6 18 18 52 102 77 45 778.5
6/19/2006 2006 6 19 19 57 102 79.5 47.5 826
6/20/2006 2006 6 20 20 63 99 81 49 875
6/21/2006 2006 6 21 21 57 99 78 46 921
6/22/2006 2006 6 22 22 61 97 79 47 968
6/23/2006 2006 6 23 23 55 102 78.5 46.5 1014.5
6/24/2006 2006 6 24 24 55 102 78.5 46.5 1061
6/25/2006 2006 6 25 25 57 100 78.5 46.5 1107.5
6/26/2006 2006 6 26 26 63 97 80 48 1155.5
6/27/2006 2006 6 27 27 59 95 77 45 1200.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
6/28/2006 2006 6 28 28 75 99 87 55 1255.5
6/29/2006 2006 6 29 29 64 100 82 50 1305.5
6/30/2006 2006 6 30 30 63 100 81.5 49.5 1355
7/1/2006 2006 7 1 31 73 95 84 52 1407
7/2/2006 2006 7 2 32 73 90 81.5 49.5 1456.5
7/3/2006 2006 7 3 33 63 95 79 47 1503.5
7/4/2006 2006 7 4 34 73 93 83 51 1554.5
7/5/2006 2006 7 5 35 70 95 82.5 50.5 1605
7/6/2006 2006 7 6 36 70 91 80.5 48.5 1653.5
7/7/2006 2006 7 7 37 64 82 73 41 1694.5
7/8/2006 2006 7 8 38 64 79 71.5 39.5 1734
7/9/2006 2006 7 9 39 64 90 77 45 1779
7/10/2006 2006 7 10 40 64 93 78.5 46.5 1825.5
7/11/2006 2006 7 11 41 66 88 77 45 1870.5
7/12/2006 2006 7 12 42 64 100 82 50 1920.5
7/13/2006 2006 7 13 43 61 102 81.5 49.5 1970
7/14/2006 2006 7 14 44 61 104 82.5 50.5 2020.5
7/15/2006 2006 7 15 45 63 108 85.5 53.5 2074
7/16/2006 2006 7 16 46 79 109 94 62 2136
7/17/2006 2006 7 17 47 75 108 91.5 59.5 2195.5
7/18/2006 2006 7 18 48 75 102 88.5 56.5 2252
7/19/2006 2006 7 19 49 75 100 87.5 55.5 2307.5
7/20/2006 2006 7 20 50 75 97 86 54 2361.5
7/21/2006 2006 7 21 51 73 102 87.5 55.5 2417
7/22/2006 2006 7 22 52 73 100 86.5 54.5 2471.5
7/23/2006 2006 7 23 53 70 108 89 57 2528.5
7/24/2006 2006 7 24 54 72 102 87 55 2583.5
7/25/2006 2006 7 25 55 81 100 90.5 58.5 2642
7/26/2006 2006 7 26 56 73 106 89.5 57.5 2699.5
7/27/2006 2006 7 27 57 70 102 86 54 2753.5
7/28/2006 2006 7 28 58 66 106 86 54 2807.5
7/29/2006 2006 7 29 59 82 104 93 61 2868.5
7/30/2006 2006 7 30 60 73 95 84 52 2920.5
7/31/2006 2006 7 31 61 75 99 87 55 2975.5
8/1/2006 2006 8 1 62 64 91 77.5 45.5 3021
8/2/2006 2006 8 2 63 61 93 77 45 3066
8/3/2006 2006 8 3 64 66 88 77 45 3111
8/4/2006 2006 8 4 65 68 79 73.5 41.5 3152.5
8/5/2006 2006 8 5 66 63 90 76.5 44.5 3197
8/6/2006 2006 8 6 67 63 91 77 45 3242
8/7/2006 2006 8 7 68 66 93 79.5 47.5 3289.5
8/8/2006 2006 8 8 69 63 91 77 45 3334.5
8/9/2006 2006 8 9 70 64 84 74 42 3376.5
8/10/2006 2006 8 10 71 61 93 77 45 3421.5
8/11/2006 2006 8 11 72 64 97 80.5 48.5 3470
8/12/2006 2006 8 12 73 70 84 77 45 3515
8/13/2006 2006 8 13 74 64 91 77.5 45.5 3560.5
8/14/2006 2006 8 14 75 63 95 79 47 3607.5
8/15/2006 2006 8 15 76 54 81 67.5 35.5 3643
8/16/2006 2006 8 16 77 61 88 74.5 42.5 3685.5
8/17/2006 2006 8 17 78 61 95 78 46 3731.5
8/18/2006 2006 8 18 79 63 90 76.5 44.5 3776
8/19/2006 2006 8 19 80 64 97 80.5 48.5 3824.5
8/20/2006 2006 8 20 81 66 93 79.5 47.5 3872
8/21/2006 2006 8 21 82 66 97 81.5 49.5 3921.5
8/22/2006 2006 8 22 83 72 100 86 54 3975.5
8/23/2006 2006 8 23 84 68 95 81.5 49.5 4025
8/24/2006 2006 8 24 85 68 90 79 47 4072
8/25/2006 2006 8 25 86 61 93 77 45 4117
8/26/2006 2006 8 26 87 63 79 71 39 4156
8/27/2006 2006 8 27 88 52 82 67 35 4191
8/28/2006 2006 8 28 89 50 99 74.5 42.5 4233.5
8/29/2006 2006 8 29 90 54 95 74.5 42.5 4276
8/30/2006 2006 8 30 91 57 95 76 44 4320
8/31/2006 2006 8 31 92 63 97 80 48 4368
9/1/2006 2006 9 1 93 61 84 72.5 40.5 4408.5
9/2/2006 2006 9 2 94 63 95 79 47 4455.5
9/3/2006 2006 9 3 95 68 90 79 47 4502.5
9/4/2006 2006 9 4 96 57 95 76 44 4546.5
9/5/2006 2006 9 5 97 57 91 74 42 4588.5
9/6/2006 2006 9 6 98 73 88 80.5 48.5 4637
9/7/2006 2006 9 7 99 61 84 72.5 40.5 4677.5
9/8/2006 2006 9 8 100 59 79 69 37 4714.5
9/9/2006 2006 9 9 101 55 75 65 33 4747.5
9/10/2006 2006 9 10 102 55 82 68.5 36.5 4784
9/11/2006 2006 9 11 103 54 86 70 38 4822
9/12/2006 2006 9 12 104 50 88 69 37 4859
9/13/2006 2006 9 13 105 52 90 71 39 4898
9/14/2006 2006 9 14 106 64 81 72.5 40.5 4938.5
9/15/2006 2006 9 15 107 54 77 65.5 33.5 4972
9/16/2006 2006 9 16 108 46 63 54.5 22.5 4994.5
9/17/2006 2006 9 17 109 37 64 50.5 18.5 5013
9/18/2006 2006 9 18 110 36 48 42 10 5023
9/19/2006 2006 9 19 111 37 81 59 27 5050
9/20/2006 2006 9 20 112 54 73 63.5 31.5 5081.5
9/21/2006 2006 9 21 113 45 66 55.5 23.5 5105
9/22/2006 2006 9 22 114 50 61 55.5 23.5 5128.5
9/23/2006 2006 9 23 115 37 64 50.5 18.5 5147
9/24/2006 2006 9 24 116 37 68 52.5 20.5 5167.5
9/25/2006 2006 9 25 117 37 75 56 24 5191.5
9/26/2006 2006 9 26 118 39 82 60.5 28.5 5220
9/27/2006 2006 9 27 119 41 82 61.5 29.5 5249.5
9/28/2006 2006 9 28 120 41 86 63.5 31.5 5281
9/29/2006 2006 9 29 121 43 86 64.5 32.5 5313.5
9/30/2006 2006 9 30 122 41 70 55.5 23.5 5337
10/1/2006 2006 10 1 123 46 75 60.5 28.5 5365.5
10/2/2006 2006 10 2 124 61 84 72.5 40.5 5406
10/3/2006 2006 10 3 125 55 75 65 33 5439
10/4/2006 2006 10 4 126 50 73 61.5 29.5 5468.5
10/5/2006 2006 10 5 127 55 63 59 27 5495.5
10/6/2006 2006 10 6 128 54 61 57.5 25.5 5521
10/7/2006 2006 10 7 129 50 68 59 27 5548
10/8/2006 2006 10 8 130 43 70 56.5 24.5 5572.5
10/9/2006 2006 10 9 131 52 55 53.5 21.5 5594
10/10/2006 2006 10 10 132 43 63 53 21 5615
10/11/2006 2006 10 11 133 41 66 53.5 21.5 5636.5
10/12/2006 2006 10 12 134 48 68 58 26 5662.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
10/13/2006 2006 10 13 135 43 68 55.5 23.5 5686
10/14/2006 2006 10 14 136 52 55 53.5 21.5 5707.5
10/15/2006 2006 10 15 137 50 66 58 26 5733.5
10/16/2006 2006 10 16 138 46 72 59 27 5760.5
10/17/2006 2006 10 17 139 41 54 47.5 15.5 5776
10/18/2006 2006 10 18 140 39 55 47 15 5791
10/19/2006 2006 10 19 141 34 61 47.5 15.5 5806.5
10/20/2006 2006 10 20 142 39 70 54.5 22.5 5829
10/21/2006 2006 10 21 143 39 50 44.5 12.5 5841.5
10/22/2006 2006 10 22 144 34 61 47.5 15.5 5857
10/23/2006 2006 10 23 145 34 64 49 17 5874
10/24/2006 2006 10 24 146 36 57 46.5 14.5 5888.5
10/25/2006 2006 10 25 147 39 55 47 15 5903.5
10/26/2006 2006 10 26 148 37 57 47 15 5918.5
10/27/2006 2006 10 27 149 30 61 45.5 13.5 5932
10/28/2006 2006 10 28 150 30 63 46.5 14.5 5946.5
10/29/2006 2006 10 29 151 32 61 46.5 14.5 5961
10/30/2006 2006 10 30 152 32 70 51 19 5980
10/31/2006 2006 10 31 153 32 66 49 17 5997
11/1/2006 2006 11 1 154 28 57 42.5 10.5 6007.5
11/2/2006 2006 11 2 155 28 57 42.5 10.5 6018
11/3/2006 2006 11 3 156 30 57 43.5 11.5 6029.5
11/4/2006 2006 11 4 157 34 63 48.5 16.5 6046
11/5/2006 2006 11 5 158 34 57 45.5 13.5 6059.5
11/6/2006 2006 11 6 159 32 61 46.5 14.5 6074
11/8/2006 2006 11 8 161 34 63 48.5 16.5 6090.5
11/9/2006 2006 11 9 162 36 68 52 20 6110.5
11/10/2006 2006 11 10 163 34 45 39.5 7.5 6118
11/11/2006 2006 11 11 164 27 45 36 4 6122
11/12/2006 2006 11 12 165 30 52 41 9 6131
11/13/2006 2006 11 13 166 27 61 44 12 6143
11/14/2006 2006 11 14 167 32 57 44.5 12.5 6155.5
11/15/2006 2006 11 15 168 23 52 37.5 5.5 6161
11/16/2006 2006 11 16 169 21 52 36.5 4.5 6165.5
11/17/2006 2006 11 17 170 25 55 40 8 6173.5
11/18/2006 2006 11 18 171 25 54 39.5 7.5 6181
11/19/2006 2006 11 19 172 25 57 41 9 6190
11/20/2006 2006 11 20 173 23 55 39 7 6197
11/21/2006 2006 11 21 174 25 54 39.5 7.5 6204.5
11/22/2006 2006 11 22 175 30 54 42 10 6214.5
11/23/2006 2006 11 23 176 39 59 49 17 6231.5
11/24/2006 2006 11 24 177 23 54 38.5 6.5 6238
11/25/2006 2006 11 25 178 21 52 36.5 4.5 6242.5
11/26/2006 2006 11 26 179 27 54 40.5 8.5 6251
11/27/2006 2006 11 27 180 43 50 46.5 14.5 6265.5
11/28/2006 2006 11 28 181 23 37 30 -2 6263.5
11/29/2006 2006 11 29 182 14 25 19.5 -12.5 6251
11/30/2006 2006 11 30 183 9 30 19.5 -12.5 6238.5
12/1/2006 2006 12 1 184 10 34 22 -10 6228.5
12/2/2006 2006 12 2 185 10 36 23 -9 6219.5
12/3/2006 2006 12 3 186 7 34 20.5 -11.5 6208
12/4/2006 2006 12 4 187 9 39 24 -8 6200
12/5/2006 2006 12 5 188 9 39 24 -8 6192
12/6/2006 2006 12 6 189 10 45 27.5 -4.5 6187.5
12/7/2006 2006 12 7 190 16 43 29.5 -2.5 6185
12/8/2006 2006 12 8 191 12 41 26.5 -5.5 6179.5
12/9/2006 2006 12 9 192 18 45 31.5 -0.5 6179
12/10/2006 2006 12 10 193 16 36 26 -6 6173
12/11/2006 2006 12 11 194 27 48 37.5 5.5 6178.5
12/12/2006 2006 12 12 195 18 46 32 0 6178.5
12/13/2006 2006 12 13 196 18 46 32 0 6178.5
12/14/2006 2006 12 14 197 18 45 31.5 -0.5 6178
12/15/2006 2006 12 15 198 25 37 31 -1 6177
12/16/2006 2006 12 16 199 30 43 36.5 4.5 6181.5
12/17/2006 2006 12 17 200 23 45 34 2 6183.5
12/18/2006 2006 12 18 201 23 37 30 -2 6181.5
12/19/2006 2006 12 19 202 27 36 31.5 -0.5 6181
12/20/2006 2006 12 20 203 27 45 36 4 6185
12/21/2006 2006 12 21 204 21 39 30 -2 6183
12/22/2006 2006 12 22 205 25 34 29.5 -2.5 6180.5
12/23/2006 2006 12 23 206 19 30 24.5 -7.5 6173
12/24/2006 2006 12 24 207 18 41 29.5 -2.5 6170.5
12/25/2006 2006 12 25 208 16 43 29.5 -2.5 6168
12/26/2006 2006 12 26 209 21 39 30 -2 6166
12/27/2006 2006 12 27 210 34 36 35 3 6169
12/28/2006 2006 12 28 211 25 39 32 0 6169
12/29/2006 2006 12 29 212 27 46 36.5 4.5 6173.5
12/30/2006 2006 12 30 213 16 45 30.5 -1.5 6172
12/31/2006 2006 12 31 214 16 45 30.5 -1.5 6170.5
1/1/2007 2007 1 1 215 21 43 32 0 6170.5
1/2/2007 2007 1 2 216 14 43 28.5 -3.5 6167
1/3/2007 2007 1 3 217 25 50 37.5 5.5 6172.5
1/4/2007 2007 1 4 218 18 52 35 3 6175.5
1/5/2007 2007 1 5 219 30 37 33.5 1.5 6177
1/6/2007 2007 1 6 220 12 37 24.5 -7.5 6169.5
1/7/2007 2007 1 7 221 12 39 25.5 -6.5 6163
1/8/2007 2007 1 8 222 12 43 27.5 -4.5 6158.5
1/9/2007 2007 1 9 223 14 43 28.5 -3.5 6155
1/10/2007 2007 1 10 224 10 43 26.5 -5.5 6149.5
1/11/2007 2007 1 11 225 21 55 38 6 6155.5
1/12/2007 2007 1 12 226 30 46 38 6 6161.5
1/13/2007 2007 1 13 227 16 30 23 -9 6152.5
1/14/2007 2007 1 14 228 10 28 19 -13 6139.5
1/15/2007 2007 1 15 229 5 27 16 -16 6123.5
1/16/2007 2007 1 16 230 9 16 12.5 -19.5 6104
1/17/2007 2007 1 17 231 1 32 16.5 -15.5 6088.5
1/18/2007 2007 1 18 232 3 34 18.5 -13.5 6075
1/19/2007 2007 1 19 233 3 37 20 -12 6063
1/20/2007 2007 1 20 234 12 45 28.5 -3.5 6059.5
1/21/2007 2007 1 21 235 18 45 31.5 -0.5 6059
1/22/2007 2007 1 22 236 7 39 23 -9 6050
1/23/2007 2007 1 23 237 12 45 28.5 -3.5 6046.5
1/24/2007 2007 1 24 238 14 52 33 1 6047.5
1/25/2007 2007 1 25 239 10 50 30 -2 6045.5
1/26/2007 2007 1 26 240 10 48 29 -3 6042.5
1/27/2007 2007 1 27 241 12 48 30 -2 6040.5
1/28/2007 2007 1 28 242 19 46 32.5 0.5 6041
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
1/29/2007 2007 1 29 243 12 50 31 -1 6040
1/30/2007 2007 1 30 244 10 41 25.5 -6.5 6033.5
1/31/2007 2007 1 31 245 25 39 32 0 6033.5
2/1/2007 2007 2 1 246 18 39 28.5 -3.5 6030
2/2/2007 2007 2 2 247 9 43 26 -6 6024
2/3/2007 2007 2 3 248 12 50 31 -1 6023
2/4/2007 2007 2 4 249 19 52 35.5 3.5 6026.5
2/5/2007 2007 2 5 250 18 61 39.5 7.5 6034
2/6/2007 2007 2 6 251 19 55 37 5 6039
2/7/2007 2007 2 7 252 19 54 36.5 4.5 6043.5
2/8/2007 2007 2 8 253 27 61 44 12 6055.5
2/9/2007 2007 2 9 254 32 57 44.5 12.5 6068
2/10/2007 2007 2 10 255 37 50 43.5 11.5 6079.5
2/11/2007 2007 2 11 256 39 55 47 15 6094.5
2/12/2007 2007 2 12 257 27 57 42 10 6104.5
2/13/2007 2007 2 13 258 37 50 43.5 11.5 6116
2/14/2007 2007 2 14 259 28 50 39 7 6123
2/15/2007 2007 2 15 260 27 52 39.5 7.5 6130.5
2/16/2007 2007 2 16 261 36 63 49.5 17.5 6148
2/17/2007 2007 2 17 262 28 61 44.5 12.5 6160.5
2/18/2007 2007 2 18 263 21 55 38 6 6166.5
2/19/2007 2007 2 19 264 32 61 46.5 14.5 6181
2/20/2007 2007 2 20 265 23 55 39 7 6188
2/21/2007 2007 2 21 266 21 61 41 9 6197
2/22/2007 2007 2 22 267 25 64 44.5 12.5 6209.5
2/23/2007 2007 2 23 268 36 52 44 12 6221.5
2/24/2007 2007 2 24 269 28 46 37 5 6226.5
2/25/2007 2007 2 25 270 27 50 38.5 6.5 6233
2/26/2007 2007 2 26 271 32 54 43 11 6244
2/27/2007 2007 2 27 272 28 55 41.5 9.5 6253.5
2/28/2007 2007 2 28 273 30 39 34.5 2.5 6256
3/1/2007 2007 3 1 274 21 39 30 -2 6254
3/2/2007 2007 3 2 275 16 39 27.5 -4.5 6249.5
3/3/2007 2007 3 3 276 10 43 26.5 -5.5 6244
3/4/2007 2007 3 4 277 18 50 34 2 6246
3/5/2007 2007 3 5 278 19 55 37 5 6251
3/6/2007 2007 3 6 279 28 61 44.5 12.5 6263.5
3/7/2007 2007 3 7 280 19 68 43.5 11.5 6275
3/8/2007 2007 3 8 281 43 61 52 20 6295
3/9/2007 2007 3 9 282 32 64 48 16 6311
3/10/2007 2007 3 10 283 41 64 52.5 20.5 6331.5
3/11/2007 2007 3 11 284 32 66 49 17 6348.5
3/12/2007 2007 3 12 285 32 75 53.5 21.5 6370
3/13/2007 2007 3 13 286 34 79 56.5 24.5 6394.5
3/14/2007 2007 3 14 287 37 81 59 27 6421.5
3/15/2007 2007 3 15 288 41 72 56.5 24.5 6446
3/16/2007 2007 3 16 289 36 73 54.5 22.5 6468.5
3/17/2007 2007 3 17 290 36 86 61 29 6497.5
3/18/2007 2007 3 18 291 39 82 60.5 28.5 6526
3/19/2007 2007 3 19 292 37 81 59 27 6553
3/20/2007 2007 3 20 293 43 73 58 26 6579
3/21/2007 2007 3 21 294 50 66 58 26 6605
3/22/2007 2007 3 22 295 41 68 54.5 22.5 6627.5
3/23/2007 2007 3 23 296 39 54 46.5 14.5 6642
3/24/2007 2007 3 24 297 46 55 50.5 18.5 6660.5
3/25/2007 2007 3 25 298 39 72 55.5 23.5 6684
3/26/2007 2007 3 26 299 39 73 56 24 6708
3/27/2007 2007 3 27 300 45 66 55.5 23.5 6731.5
3/28/2007 2007 3 28 301 36 50 43 11 6742.5
3/29/2007 2007 3 29 302 36 46 41 9 6751.5
3/30/2007 2007 3 30 303 28 46 37 5 6756.5
3/31/2007 2007 3 31 304 28 72 50 18 6774.5
4/1/2007 2007 4 1 305 37 73 55 23 6797.5
4/2/2007 2007 4 2 306 55 77 66 34 6831.5
4/3/2007 2007 4 3 307 43 79 61 29 6860.5
4/4/2007 2007 4 4 308 37 81 59 27 6887.5
4/5/2007 2007 4 5 309 46 81 63.5 31.5 6919
4/6/2007 2007 4 6 310 39 73 56 24 6943
4/7/2007 2007 4 7 311 46 79 62.5 30.5 6973.5
4/8/2007 2007 4 8 312 50 66 58 26 6999.5
4/9/2007 2007 4 9 313 43 70 56.5 24.5 7024
4/10/2007 2007 4 10 314 43 54 48.5 16.5 7040.5
4/11/2007 2007 4 11 315 36 57 46.5 14.5 7055
4/12/2007 2007 4 12 316 45 54 49.5 17.5 7072.5
4/13/2007 2007 4 13 317 37 61 49 17 7089.5
4/14/2007 2007 4 14 318 28 72 50 18 7107.5
4/15/2007 2007 4 15 319 46 64 55 23 7130.5
4/16/2007 2007 4 16 320 43 64 53.5 21.5 7152
4/17/2007 2007 4 17 321 37 73 55 23 7175
4/18/2007 2007 4 18 322 43 66 54.5 22.5 7197.5
4/19/2007 2007 4 19 323 34 63 48.5 16.5 7214
4/20/2007 2007 4 20 324 32 63 47.5 15.5 7229.5
4/21/2007 2007 4 21 325 45 66 55.5 23.5 7253
4/22/2007 2007 4 22 326 37 64 50.5 18.5 7271.5
4/23/2007 2007 4 23 327 43 55 49 17 7288.5
4/24/2007 2007 4 24 328 43 66 54.5 22.5 7311
4/25/2007 2007 4 25 329 41 70 55.5 23.5 7334.5
4/26/2007 2007 4 26 330 43 73 58 26 7360.5
4/27/2007 2007 4 27 331 45 79 62 30 7390.5
4/28/2007 2007 4 28 332 45 86 65.5 33.5 7424
4/29/2007 2007 4 29 333 48 88 68 36 7460
4/30/2007 2007 4 30 334 54 90 72 40 7500
5/1/2007 2007 5 1 335 61 81 71 39 7539
5/2/2007 2007 5 2 336 61 75 68 36 7575
5/3/2007 2007 5 3 337 50 70 60 28 7603
5/4/2007 2007 5 4 338 46 66 56 24 7627
5/5/2007 2007 5 5 339 46 55 50.5 18.5 7645.5
5/6/2007 2007 5 6 340 48 55 51.5 19.5 7665
5/7/2007 2007 5 7 341 34 70 52 20 7685
5/8/2007 2007 5 8 342 37 79 58 26 7711
5/9/2007 2007 5 9 343 45 90 67.5 35.5 7746.5
5/10/2007 2007 5 10 344 61 91 76 44 7790.5
5/11/2007 2007 5 11 345 48 93 70.5 38.5 7829
5/12/2007 2007 5 12 346 55 97 76 44 7873
5/13/2007 2007 5 13 347 64 90 77 45 7918
5/14/2007 2007 5 14 348 52 88 70 38 7956
5/15/2007 2007 5 15 349 46 90 68 36 7992
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
5/16/2007 2007 5 16 350 61 90 75.5 43.5 8035.5
5/17/2007 2007 5 17 351 63 82 72.5 40.5 8076
5/18/2007 2007 5 18 352 52 86 69 37 8113
5/19/2007 2007 5 19 353 57 84 70.5 38.5 8151.5
5/20/2007 2007 5 20 354 57 88 72.5 40.5 8192
5/21/2007 2007 5 21 355 57 86 71.5 39.5 8231.5
5/22/2007 2007 5 22 356 54 66 60 28 8259.5
5/23/2007 2007 5 23 357 46 73 59.5 27.5 8287
5/24/2007 2007 5 24 358 43 72 57.5 25.5 8312.5
5/25/2007 2007 5 25 359 43 88 65.5 33.5 8346
5/26/2007 2007 5 26 360 46 88 67 35 8381
5/27/2007 2007 5 27 361 52 97 74.5 42.5 8423.5
5/28/2007 2007 5 28 362 54 90 72 40 8463.5
5/29/2007 2007 5 29 363 55 82 68.5 36.5 8500
5/30/2007 2007 5 30 364 46 84 65 33 8533
5/31/2007 2007 5 31 365 46 81 63.5 31.5 8564.5
6/1/2007 2007 6 1 1 52 91 71.5 39.5 39.5
6/2/2007 2007 6 2 2 54 95 74.5 42.5 82
6/3/2007 2007 6 3 3 55 91 73 41 123
6/4/2007 2007 6 4 4 70 97 83.5 51.5 174.5
6/5/2007 2007 6 5 5 63 91 77 45 219.5
6/6/2007 2007 6 6 6 54 70 62 30 249.5
6/7/2007 2007 6 7 7 45 70 57.5 25.5 275
6/8/2007 2007 6 8 8 43 81 62 30 305
6/9/2007 2007 6 9 9 46 93 69.5 37.5 342.5
6/10/2007 2007 6 10 10 52 95 73.5 41.5 384
6/11/2007 2007 6 11 11 64 90 77 45 429
6/12/2007 2007 6 12 12 64 88 76 44 473
6/13/2007 2007 6 13 13 52 91 71.5 39.5 512.5
6/14/2007 2007 6 14 14 54 99 76.5 44.5 557
6/15/2007 2007 6 15 15 57 102 79.5 47.5 604.5
6/16/2007 2007 6 16 16 64 104 84 52 656.5
6/17/2007 2007 6 17 17 64 100 82 50 706.5
6/18/2007 2007 6 18 18 66 93 79.5 47.5 754
6/19/2007 2007 6 19 19 55 102 78.5 46.5 800.5
6/20/2007 2007 6 20 20 59 102 80.5 48.5 849
6/21/2007 2007 6 21 21 59 102 80.5 48.5 897.5
6/22/2007 2007 6 22 22 57 106 81.5 49.5 947
6/23/2007 2007 6 23 23 57 106 81.5 49.5 996.5
6/24/2007 2007 6 24 24 66 100 83 51 1047.5
6/25/2007 2007 6 25 25 63 91 77 45 1092.5
6/26/2007 2007 6 26 26 70 100 85 53 1145.5
6/27/2007 2007 6 27 27 75 95 85 53 1198.5
6/28/2007 2007 6 28 28 63 106 84.5 52.5 1251
6/29/2007 2007 6 29 29 61 102 81.5 49.5 1300.5
6/30/2007 2007 6 30 30 61 106 83.5 51.5 1352
7/1/2007 2007 7 1 31 57 106 81.5 49.5 1401.5
7/2/2007 2007 7 2 32 57 109 83 51 1452.5
7/3/2007 2007 7 3 33 57 106 81.5 49.5 1502
7/4/2007 2007 7 4 34 63 106 84.5 52.5 1554.5
7/5/2007 2007 7 5 35 79 106 92.5 60.5 1615
7/6/2007 2007 7 6 36 81 97 89 57 1672
7/7/2007 2007 7 7 37 68 102 85 53 1725
7/8/2007 2007 7 8 38 64 99 81.5 49.5 1774.5
7/9/2007 2007 7 9 39 63 106 84.5 52.5 1827
7/10/2007 2007 7 10 40 64 108 86 54 1881
7/11/2007 2007 7 11 41 72 102 87 55 1936
7/12/2007 2007 7 12 42 72 97 84.5 52.5 1988.5
7/13/2007 2007 7 13 43 64 100 82 50 2038.5
7/14/2007 2007 7 14 44 68 102 85 53 2091.5
7/15/2007 2007 7 15 45 66 106 86 54 2145.5
7/16/2007 2007 7 16 46 72 104 88 56 2201.5
7/17/2007 2007 7 17 47 75 99 87 55 2256.5
7/18/2007 2007 7 18 48 75 106 90.5 58.5 2315
7/19/2007 2007 7 19 49 82 106 94 62 2377
7/20/2007 2007 7 20 50 84 100 92 60 2437
7/21/2007 2007 7 21 51 73 108 90.5 58.5 2495.5
7/22/2007 2007 7 22 52 73 102 87.5 55.5 2551
7/23/2007 2007 7 23 53 70 97 83.5 51.5 2602.5
7/24/2007 2007 7 24 54 70 99 84.5 52.5 2655
7/25/2007 2007 7 25 55 79 100 89.5 57.5 2712.5
7/26/2007 2007 7 26 56 72 97 84.5 52.5 2765
7/27/2007 2007 7 27 57 73 97 85 53 2818
7/28/2007 2007 7 28 58 68 97 82.5 50.5 2868.5
7/29/2007 2007 7 29 59 70 97 83.5 51.5 2920
7/30/2007 2007 7 30 60 77 104 90.5 58.5 2978.5
7/31/2007 2007 7 31 61 75 91 83 51 3029.5
8/1/2007 2007 8 1 62 72 91 81.5 49.5 3079
8/2/2007 2007 8 2 63 70 90 80 48 3127
8/3/2007 2007 8 3 64 66 91 78.5 46.5 3173.5
8/4/2007 2007 8 4 65 70 93 81.5 49.5 3223
8/5/2007 2007 8 5 66 66 95 80.5 48.5 3271.5
8/6/2007 2007 8 6 67 68 95 81.5 49.5 3321
8/7/2007 2007 8 7 68 70 95 82.5 50.5 3371.5
8/8/2007 2007 8 8 69 70 97 83.5 51.5 3423
8/9/2007 2007 8 9 70 61 97 79 47 3470
8/10/2007 2007 8 10 71 64 100 82 50 3520
8/11/2007 2007 8 11 72 63 100 81.5 49.5 3569.5
8/12/2007 2007 8 12 73 72 102 87 55 3624.5
8/13/2007 2007 8 13 74 73 100 86.5 54.5 3679
8/14/2007 2007 8 14 75 73 99 86 54 3733
8/15/2007 2007 8 15 76 72 93 82.5 50.5 3783.5
8/16/2007 2007 8 16 77 70 99 84.5 52.5 3836
8/17/2007 2007 8 17 78 75 99 87 55 3891
8/18/2007 2007 8 18 79 73 97 85 53 3944
8/19/2007 2007 8 19 80 66 95 80.5 48.5 3992.5
8/20/2007 2007 8 20 81 64 100 82 50 4042.5
8/21/2007 2007 8 21 82 63 102 82.5 50.5 4093
8/22/2007 2007 8 22 83 61 102 81.5 49.5 4142.5
8/23/2007 2007 8 23 84 63 97 80 48 4190.5
8/24/2007 2007 8 24 85 70 100 85 53 4243.5
8/25/2007 2007 8 25 86 63 102 82.5 50.5 4294
8/26/2007 2007 8 26 87 70 97 83.5 51.5 4345.5
8/27/2007 2007 8 27 88 64 77 70.5 38.5 4384
8/28/2007 2007 8 28 89 73 81 77 45 4429
8/29/2007 2007 8 29 90 63 97 80 48 4477
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
8/30/2007 2007 8 30 91 64 97 80.5 48.5 4525.5
8/31/2007 2007 8 31 92 72 93 82.5 50.5 4576
9/1/2007 2007 9 1 93 66 97 81.5 49.5 4625.5
9/2/2007 2007 9 2 94 66 100 83 51 4676.5
9/3/2007 2007 9 3 95 72 97 84.5 52.5 4729
9/4/2007 2007 9 4 96 66 91 78.5 46.5 4775.5
9/5/2007 2007 9 5 97 61 95 78 46 4821.5
9/6/2007 2007 9 6 98 64 91 77.5 45.5 4867
9/7/2007 2007 9 7 99 55 93 74 42 4909
9/8/2007 2007 9 8 100 54 97 75.5 43.5 4952.5
9/9/2007 2007 9 9 101 57 88 72.5 40.5 4993
9/10/2007 2007 9 10 102 63 86 74.5 42.5 5035.5
9/11/2007 2007 9 11 103 54 81 67.5 35.5 5071
9/12/2007 2007 9 12 104 52 91 71.5 39.5 5110.5
9/13/2007 2007 9 13 105 54 93 73.5 41.5 5152
9/14/2007 2007 9 14 106 63 93 78 46 5198
9/15/2007 2007 9 15 107 68 91 79.5 47.5 5245.5
9/16/2007 2007 9 16 108 72 86 79 47 5292.5
9/17/2007 2007 9 17 109 57 88 72.5 40.5 5333
9/18/2007 2007 9 18 110 46 84 65 33 5366
9/19/2007 2007 9 19 111 46 86 66 34 5400
9/20/2007 2007 9 20 112 64 88 76 44 5444
9/21/2007 2007 9 21 113 50 88 69 37 5481
9/22/2007 2007 9 22 114 54 84 69 37 5518
9/23/2007 2007 9 23 115 54 75 64.5 32.5 5550.5
9/24/2007 2007 9 24 116 48 64 56 24 5574.5
9/25/2007 2007 9 25 117 37 68 52.5 20.5 5595
9/26/2007 2007 9 26 118 43 75 59 27 5622
9/27/2007 2007 9 27 119 41 81 61 29 5651
9/28/2007 2007 9 28 120 48 82 65 33 5684
9/29/2007 2007 9 29 121 46 75 60.5 28.5 5712.5
9/30/2007 2007 9 30 122 36 64 50 18 5730.5
10/1/2007 2007 10 1 123 36 68 52 20 5750.5
10/2/2007 2007 10 2 124 43 70 56.5 24.5 5775
10/3/2007 2007 10 3 125 43 82 62.5 30.5 5805.5
10/4/2007 2007 10 4 126 68 81 74.5 42.5 5848
10/5/2007 2007 10 5 127 63 84 73.5 41.5 5889.5
10/6/2007 2007 10 6 128 48 61 54.5 22.5 5912
10/7/2007 2007 10 7 129 37 63 50 18 5930
10/8/2007 2007 10 8 130 34 64 49 17 5947
10/9/2007 2007 10 9 131 34 72 53 21 5968
10/10/2007 2007 10 10 132 39 84 61.5 29.5 5997.5
10/11/2007 2007 10 11 133 39 79 59 27 6024.5
10/12/2007 2007 10 12 134 45 72 58.5 26.5 6051
10/13/2007 2007 10 13 135 45 75 60 28 6079
10/14/2007 2007 10 14 136 39 68 53.5 21.5 6100.5
10/15/2007 2007 10 15 137 37 75 56 24 6124.5
10/16/2007 2007 10 16 138 39 75 57 25 6149.5
10/17/2007 2007 10 17 139 43 61 52 20 6169.5
10/18/2007 2007 10 18 140 43 63 53 21 6190.5
10/19/2007 2007 10 19 141 36 73 54.5 22.5 6213
10/20/2007 2007 10 20 142 43 79 61 29 6242
10/21/2007 2007 10 21 143 41 64 52.5 20.5 6262.5
10/22/2007 2007 10 22 144 27 52 39.5 7.5 6270
10/23/2007 2007 10 23 145 30 64 47 15 6285
10/24/2007 2007 10 24 146 28 70 49 17 6302
10/25/2007 2007 10 25 147 32 73 52.5 20.5 6322.5
10/26/2007 2007 10 26 148 32 73 52.5 20.5 6343
10/27/2007 2007 10 27 149 34 66 50 18 6361
10/28/2007 2007 10 28 150 37 70 53.5 21.5 6382.5
10/29/2007 2007 10 29 151 37 64 50.5 18.5 6401
10/30/2007 2007 10 30 152 45 66 55.5 23.5 6424.5
10/31/2007 2007 10 31 153 37 70 53.5 21.5 6446
11/1/2007 2007 11 1 154 30 66 48 16 6462
11/2/2007 2007 11 2 155 32 64 48 16 6478
11/3/2007 2007 11 3 156 25 63 44 12 6490
11/4/2007 2007 11 4 157 25 64 44.5 12.5 6502.5
11/5/2007 2007 11 5 158 21 66 43.5 11.5 6514
11/6/2007 2007 11 6 159 25 66 45.5 13.5 6527.5
11/7/2007 2007 11 7 160 27 64 45.5 13.5 6541
11/8/2007 2007 11 8 161 27 68 47.5 15.5 6556.5
11/9/2007 2007 11 9 162 30 63 46.5 14.5 6571
11/10/2007 2007 11 10 163 41 70 55.5 23.5 6594.5
11/11/2007 2007 11 11 164 30 61 45.5 13.5 6608
11/12/2007 2007 11 12 165 39 68 53.5 21.5 6629.5
11/13/2007 2007 11 13 166 28 68 48 16 6645.5
11/14/2007 2007 11 14 167 34 64 49 17 6662.5
11/15/2007 2007 11 15 168 21 57 39 7 6669.5
11/16/2007 2007 11 16 169 21 61 41 9 6678.5
11/17/2007 2007 11 17 170 27 64 45.5 13.5 6692
11/18/2007 2007 11 18 171 25 63 44 12 6704
11/19/2007 2007 11 19 172 23 68 45.5 13.5 6717.5
11/20/2007 2007 11 20 173 36 63 49.5 17.5 6735
11/21/2007 2007 11 21 174 19 46 32.5 0.5 6735.5
11/22/2007 2007 11 22 175 10 39 24.5 -7.5 6728
11/23/2007 2007 11 23 176 21 39 30 -2 6726
11/24/2007 2007 11 24 177 10 43 26.5 -5.5 6720.5
11/25/2007 2007 11 25 178 10 43 26.5 -5.5 6715
11/26/2007 2007 11 26 179 25 48 36.5 4.5 6719.5
11/27/2007 2007 11 27 180 18 55 36.5 4.5 6724
11/28/2007 2007 11 28 181 21 43 32 0 6724
11/29/2007 2007 11 29 182 12 39 25.5 -6.5 6717.5
11/30/2007 2007 11 30 183 21 37 29 -3 6714.5
12/1/2007 2007 12 1 184 36 54 45 13 6727.5
12/2/2007 2007 12 2 185 27 46 36.5 4.5 6732
12/3/2007 2007 12 3 186 21 43 32 0 6732
12/4/2007 2007 12 4 187 19 45 32 0 6732
12/5/2007 2007 12 5 188 28 43 35.5 3.5 6735.5
12/6/2007 2007 12 6 189 25 39 32 0 6735.5
12/7/2007 2007 12 7 190 36 55 45.5 13.5 6749
12/8/2007 2007 12 8 191 36 54 45 13 6762
12/9/2007 2007 12 9 192 25 46 35.5 3.5 6765.5
12/10/2007 2007 12 10 193 21 37 29 -3 6762.5
12/11/2007 2007 12 11 194 27 36 31.5 -0.5 6762
12/12/2007 2007 12 12 195 19 37 28 -4 6758
12/13/2007 2007 12 13 196 27 30 28.5 -3.5 6754.5
12/14/2007 2007 12 14 197 18 36 27 -5 6749.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
12/15/2007 2007 12 15 198 9 34 21.5 -10.5 6739
12/16/2007 2007 12 16 199 10 36 23 -9 6730
12/17/2007 2007 12 17 200 16 36 26 -6 6724
12/18/2007 2007 12 18 201 12 34 23 -9 6715
12/19/2007 2007 12 19 202 25 43 34 2 6717
12/20/2007 2007 12 20 203 21 45 33 1 6718
12/21/2007 2007 12 21 204 28 36 32 0 6718
12/22/2007 2007 12 22 205 21 36 28.5 -3.5 6714.5
12/23/2007 2007 12 23 206 18 37 27.5 -4.5 6710
12/24/2007 2007 12 24 207 12 37 24.5 -7.5 6702.5
12/25/2007 2007 12 25 208 18 37 27.5 -4.5 6698
12/26/2007 2007 12 26 209 14 36 25 -7 6691
12/27/2007 2007 12 27 210 12 36 24 -8 6683
12/28/2007 2007 12 28 211 5 28 16.5 -15.5 6667.5
12/29/2007 2007 12 29 212 9 32 20.5 -11.5 6656
12/30/2007 2007 12 30 213 5 43 24 -8 6648
12/31/2007 2007 12 31 214 16 36 26 -6 6642
1/1/2008 2008 1 1 215 7 28 17.5 -14.5 6627.5
1/2/2008 2008 1 2 216 18 30 24 -8 6619.5
1/3/2008 2008 1 3 217 12 36 24 -8 6611.5
1/4/2008 2008 1 4 218 25 39 32 0 6611.5
1/5/2008 2008 1 5 219 37 54 45.5 13.5 6625
1/6/2008 2008 1 6 220 27 48 37.5 5.5 6630.5
1/7/2008 2008 1 7 221 21 37 29 -3 6627.5
1/8/2008 2008 1 8 222 16 34 25 -7 6620.5
1/9/2008 2008 1 9 223 28 39 33.5 1.5 6622
1/10/2008 2008 1 10 224 19 36 27.5 -4.5 6617.5
1/11/2008 2008 1 11 225 16 45 30.5 -1.5 6616
1/12/2008 2008 1 12 226 18 43 30.5 -1.5 6614.5
1/13/2008 2008 1 13 227 18 43 30.5 -1.5 6613
1/14/2008 2008 1 14 228 12 39 25.5 -6.5 6606.5
1/15/2008 2008 1 15 229 16 37 26.5 -5.5 6601
1/16/2008 2008 1 16 230 9 28 18.5 -13.5 6587.5
1/17/2008 2008 1 17 231 0 30 15 -17 6570.5
1/18/2008 2008 1 18 232 5 34 19.5 -12.5 6558
1/19/2008 2008 1 19 233 5 36 20.5 -11.5 6546.5
1/20/2008 2008 1 20 234 7 37 22 -10 6536.5
1/21/2008 2008 1 21 235 9 46 27.5 -4.5 6532
1/22/2008 2008 1 22 236 16 45 30.5 -1.5 6530.5
1/23/2008 2008 1 23 237 10 43 26.5 -5.5 6525
1/24/2008 2008 1 24 238 18 34 26 -6 6519
1/25/2008 2008 1 25 239 21 30 25.5 -6.5 6512.5
1/26/2008 2008 1 26 240 18 39 28.5 -3.5 6509
1/27/2008 2008 1 27 241 25 34 29.5 -2.5 6506.5
1/28/2008 2008 1 28 242 25 48 36.5 4.5 6511
1/29/2008 2008 1 29 243 18 36 27 -5 6506
1/30/2008 2008 1 30 244 25 36 30.5 -1.5 6504.5
1/31/2008 2008 1 31 245 9 37 23 -9 6495.5
2/1/2008 2008 2 1 246 21 39 30 -2 6493.5
2/2/2008 2008 2 2 247 27 43 35 3 6496.5
2/3/2008 2008 2 3 248 25 43 34 2 6498.5
2/4/2008 2008 2 4 249 32 39 35.5 3.5 6502
2/5/2008 2008 2 5 250 21 25 23 -9 6493
2/6/2008 2008 2 6 251 16 37 26.5 -5.5 6487.5
2/7/2008 2008 2 7 252 16 37 26.5 -5.5 6482
2/8/2008 2008 2 8 253 19 50 34.5 2.5 6484.5
2/9/2008 2008 2 9 254 18 50 34 2 6486.5
2/10/2008 2008 2 10 255 19 50 34.5 2.5 6489
2/11/2008 2008 2 11 256 19 55 37 5 6494
2/12/2008 2008 2 12 257 27 55 41 9 6503
2/13/2008 2008 2 13 258 23 57 40 8 6511
2/14/2008 2008 2 14 259 21 41 31 -1 6510
2/15/2008 2008 2 15 260 30 45 37.5 5.5 6515.5
2/16/2008 2008 2 16 261 19 50 34.5 2.5 6518
2/17/2008 2008 2 17 262 27 50 38.5 6.5 6524.5
2/18/2008 2008 2 18 263 21 48 34.5 2.5 6527
2/19/2008 2008 2 19 264 21 48 34.5 2.5 6529.5
2/20/2008 2008 2 20 265 30 48 39 7 6536.5
2/21/2008 2008 2 21 266 34 50 42 10 6546.5
2/22/2008 2008 2 22 267 36 54 45 13 6559.5
2/23/2008 2008 2 23 268 43 55 49 17 6576.5
2/24/2008 2008 2 24 269 43 59 51 19 6595.5
2/25/2008 2008 2 25 270 30 57 43.5 11.5 6607
2/26/2008 2008 2 26 271 27 54 40.5 8.5 6615.5
2/27/2008 2008 2 27 272 25 55 40 8 6623.5
2/28/2008 2008 2 28 273 30 66 48 16 6639.5
2/29/2008 2008 2 29 274 27 63 45 13 6652.5
3/1/2008 2008 3 1 275 27 66 46.5 14.5 6667
3/2/2008 2008 3 2 276 30 43 36.5 4.5 6671.5
3/3/2008 2008 3 3 277 19 50 34.5 2.5 6674
3/4/2008 2008 3 4 278 21 52 36.5 4.5 6678.5
3/5/2008 2008 3 5 279 19 46 32.5 0.5 6679
3/6/2008 2008 3 6 280 16 52 34 2 6681
3/7/2008 2008 3 7 281 19 55 37 5 6686
3/8/2008 2008 3 8 282 41 61 51 19 6705
3/9/2008 2008 3 9 283 32 57 44.5 12.5 6717.5
3/10/2008 2008 3 10 284 25 63 44 12 6729.5
3/11/2008 2008 3 11 285 21 63 42 10 6739.5
3/12/2008 2008 3 12 286 27 57 42 10 6749.5
3/13/2008 2008 3 13 287 27 64 45.5 13.5 6763
3/14/2008 2008 3 14 288 36 55 45.5 13.5 6776.5
3/15/2008 2008 3 15 289 21 54 37.5 5.5 6782
3/16/2008 2008 3 16 290 28 46 37 5 6787
3/17/2008 2008 3 17 291 36 54 45 13 6800
3/18/2008 2008 3 18 292 25 59 42 10 6810
3/19/2008 2008 3 19 293 28 68 48 16 6826
3/20/2008 2008 3 20 294 45 68 56.5 24.5 6850.5
3/21/2008 2008 3 21 295 30 63 46.5 14.5 6865
3/22/2008 2008 3 22 296 30 63 46.5 14.5 6879.5
3/23/2008 2008 3 23 297 23 63 43 11 6890.5
3/24/2008 2008 3 24 298 25 70 47.5 15.5 6906
3/25/2008 2008 3 25 299 34 79 56.5 24.5 6930.5
3/26/2008 2008 3 26 300 37 75 56 24 6954.5
3/27/2008 2008 3 27 301 46 66 56 24 6978.5
3/28/2008 2008 3 28 302 30 63 46.5 14.5 6993
3/29/2008 2008 3 29 303 34 66 50 18 7011
3/30/2008 2008 3 30 304 45 66 55.5 23.5 7034.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
3/31/2008 2008 3 31 305 32 50 41 9 7043.5
4/1/2008 2008 4 1 306 23 57 40 8 7051.5
4/2/2008 2008 4 2 307 25 66 45.5 13.5 7065
4/3/2008 2008 4 3 308 43 61 52 20 7085
4/4/2008 2008 4 4 309 30 64 47 15 7100
4/5/2008 2008 4 5 310 46 66 56 24 7124
4/6/2008 2008 4 6 311 34 64 49 17 7141
4/7/2008 2008 4 7 312 39 63 51 19 7160
4/8/2008 2008 4 8 313 30 64 47 15 7175
4/9/2008 2008 4 9 314 46 55 50.5 18.5 7193.5
4/10/2008 2008 4 10 315 39 45 42 10 7203.5
4/11/2008 2008 4 11 316 39 55 47 15 7218.5
4/12/2008 2008 4 12 317 34 66 50 18 7236.5
4/13/2008 2008 4 13 318 30 72 51 19 7255.5
4/14/2008 2008 4 14 319 34 81 57.5 25.5 7281
4/15/2008 2008 4 15 320 46 79 62.5 30.5 7311.5
4/16/2008 2008 4 16 321 36 52 44 12 7323.5
4/17/2008 2008 4 17 322 34 63 48.5 16.5 7340
4/18/2008 2008 4 18 323 28 79 53.5 21.5 7361.5
4/19/2008 2008 4 19 324 54 79 66.5 34.5 7396
4/20/2008 2008 4 20 325 55 73 64 32 7428
4/21/2008 2008 4 21 326 34 70 52 20 7448
4/22/2008 2008 4 22 327 30 75 52.5 20.5 7468.5
4/23/2008 2008 4 23 328 39 73 56 24 7492.5
4/24/2008 2008 4 24 329 41 55 48 16 7508.5
4/25/2008 2008 4 25 330 27 64 45.5 13.5 7522
4/26/2008 2008 4 26 331 48 66 57 25 7547
4/27/2008 2008 4 27 332 30 72 51 19 7566
4/28/2008 2008 4 28 333 39 81 60 28 7594
4/29/2008 2008 4 29 334 46 82 64 32 7626
4/30/2008 2008 4 30 335 45 75 60 28 7654
5/1/2008 2008 5 1 336 39 50 44.5 12.5 7666.5
5/2/2008 2008 5 2 337 30 64 47 15 7681.5
5/3/2008 2008 5 3 338 36 70 53 21 7702.5
5/4/2008 2008 5 4 339 43 75 59 27 7729.5
5/5/2008 2008 5 5 340 39 82 60.5 28.5 7758
5/6/2008 2008 5 6 341 48 88 68 36 7794
5/7/2008 2008 5 7 342 48 81 64.5 32.5 7826.5
5/8/2008 2008 5 8 343 52 73 62.5 30.5 7857
5/9/2008 2008 5 9 344 39 72 55.5 23.5 7880.5
5/10/2008 2008 5 10 345 46 66 56 24 7904.5
5/11/2008 2008 5 11 346 50 84 67 35 7939.5
5/12/2008 2008 5 12 347 46 72 59 27 7966.5
5/13/2008 2008 5 13 348 45 64 54.5 22.5 7989
5/14/2008 2008 5 14 349 39 72 55.5 23.5 8012.5
5/15/2008 2008 5 15 350 55 72 63.5 31.5 8044
5/16/2008 2008 5 16 351 43 81 62 30 8074
5/17/2008 2008 5 17 352 46 90 68 36 8110
5/18/2008 2008 5 18 353 48 95 71.5 39.5 8149.5
5/19/2008 2008 5 19 354 72 99 85.5 53.5 8203
5/20/2008 2008 5 20 355 55 91 73 41 8244
5/21/2008 2008 5 21 356 55 77 66 34 8278
5/22/2008 2008 5 22 357 50 64 57 25 8303
5/23/2008 2008 5 23 358 46 61 53.5 21.5 8324.5
5/24/2008 2008 5 24 359 46 64 55 23 8347.5
5/25/2008 2008 5 25 360 48 73 60.5 28.5 8376
5/26/2008 2008 5 26 361 50 72 61 29 8405
5/27/2008 2008 5 27 362 39 81 60 28 8433
5/28/2008 2008 5 28 363 48 81 64.5 32.5 8465.5
5/29/2008 2008 5 29 364 63 81 72 40 8505.5
5/30/2008 2008 5 30 365 46 84 65 33 8538.5
5/31/2008 2008 5 31 366 45 90 67.5 35.5 8574
6/1/2008 2008 6 1 1 55 93 74 42 42
6/2/2008 2008 6 2 2 55 91 73 41 83
6/3/2008 2008 6 3 3 55 88 71.5 39.5 122.5
6/4/2008 2008 6 4 4 52 72 62 30 152.5
6/5/2008 2008 6 5 5 50 72 61 29 181.5
6/6/2008 2008 6 6 6 43 82 62.5 30.5 212
6/7/2008 2008 6 7 7 66 75 70.5 38.5 250.5
6/8/2008 2008 6 8 8 52 81 66.5 34.5 285
6/9/2008 2008 6 9 9 43 84 63.5 31.5 316.5
6/10/2008 2008 6 10 10 48 93 70.5 38.5 355
6/11/2008 2008 6 11 11 61 77 69 37 392
6/12/2008 2008 6 12 12 61 72 66.5 34.5 426.5
6/13/2008 2008 6 13 13 57 86 71.5 39.5 466
6/14/2008 2008 6 14 14 46 99 72.5 40.5 506.5
6/15/2008 2008 6 15 15 54 99 76.5 44.5 551
6/16/2008 2008 6 16 16 63 100 81.5 49.5 600.5
6/17/2008 2008 6 17 17 57 99 78 46 646.5
6/18/2008 2008 6 18 18 59 100 79.5 47.5 694
6/19/2008 2008 6 19 19 68 88 78 46 740
6/20/2008 2008 6 20 20 54 97 75.5 43.5 783.5
6/21/2008 2008 6 21 21 57 102 79.5 47.5 831
6/22/2008 2008 6 22 22 64 102 83 51 882
6/23/2008 2008 6 23 23 81 93 87 55 937
6/24/2008 2008 6 24 24 64 91 77.5 45.5 982.5
6/25/2008 2008 6 25 25 59 100 79.5 47.5 1030
6/26/2008 2008 6 26 26 68 102 85 53 1083
6/27/2008 2008 6 27 27 70 99 84.5 52.5 1135.5
6/28/2008 2008 6 28 28 61 102 81.5 49.5 1185
6/29/2008 2008 6 29 29 70 99 84.5 52.5 1237.5
6/30/2008 2008 6 30 30 66 102 84 52 1289.5
7/1/2008 2008 7 1 31 72 99 85.5 53.5 1343
7/2/2008 2008 7 2 32 63 106 84.5 52.5 1395.5
7/3/2008 2008 7 3 33 64 106 85 53 1448.5
7/4/2008 2008 7 4 34 70 106 88 56 1504.5
7/5/2008 2008 7 5 35 73 91 82 50 1554.5
7/6/2008 2008 7 6 36 61 91 76 44 1598.5
7/7/2008 2008 7 7 37 61 97 79 47 1645.5
7/8/2008 2008 7 8 38 63 100 81.5 49.5 1695
7/9/2008 2008 7 9 39 79 102 90.5 58.5 1753.5
7/10/2008 2008 7 10 40 61 102 81.5 49.5 1803
7/11/2008 2008 7 11 41 72 100 86 54 1857
7/12/2008 2008 7 12 42 72 100 86 54 1911
7/13/2008 2008 7 13 43 77 99 88 56 1967
7/14/2008 2008 7 14 44 79 99 89 57 2024
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
7/15/2008 2008 7 15 45 72 102 87 55 2079
7/16/2008 2008 7 16 46 75 97 86 54 2133
7/17/2008 2008 7 17 47 64 99 81.5 49.5 2182.5
7/18/2008 2008 7 18 48 70 102 86 54 2236.5
7/19/2008 2008 7 19 49 66 106 86 54 2290.5
7/20/2008 2008 7 20 50 82 99 90.5 58.5 2349
7/21/2008 2008 7 21 51 81 91 86 54 2403
7/22/2008 2008 7 22 52 70 93 81.5 49.5 2452.5
7/23/2008 2008 7 23 53 72 99 85.5 53.5 2506
7/24/2008 2008 7 24 54 81 102 91.5 59.5 2565.5
7/25/2008 2008 7 25 55 72 102 87 55 2620.5
7/26/2008 2008 7 26 56 79 99 89 57 2677.5
7/27/2008 2008 7 27 57 75 97 86 54 2731.5
7/28/2008 2008 7 28 58 66 95 80.5 48.5 2780
7/29/2008 2008 7 29 59 64 100 82 50 2830
7/30/2008 2008 7 30 60 70 104 87 55 2885
7/31/2008 2008 7 31 61 75 106 90.5 58.5 2943.5
8/1/2008 2008 8 1 62 75 108 91.5 59.5 3003
8/2/2008 2008 8 2 63 75 102 88.5 56.5 3059.5
8/3/2008 2008 8 3 64 73 104 88.5 56.5 3116
8/4/2008 2008 8 4 65 73 102 87.5 55.5 3171.5
8/5/2008 2008 8 5 66 72 99 85.5 53.5 3225
8/6/2008 2008 8 6 67 68 82 75 43 3268
8/7/2008 2008 8 7 68 64 84 74 42 3310
8/8/2008 2008 8 8 69 66 88 77 45 3355
8/9/2008 2008 8 9 70 63 88 75.5 43.5 3398.5
8/10/2008 2008 8 10 71 66 95 80.5 48.5 3447
8/11/2008 2008 8 11 72 64 99 81.5 49.5 3496.5
8/12/2008 2008 8 12 73 61 93 77 45 3541.5
8/13/2008 2008 8 13 74 66 100 83 51 3592.5
8/14/2008 2008 8 14 75 63 99 81 49 3641.5
8/15/2008 2008 8 15 76 63 93 78 46 3687.5
8/16/2008 2008 8 16 77 59 88 73.5 41.5 3729
8/17/2008 2008 8 17 78 57 91 74 42 3771
8/18/2008 2008 8 18 79 57 97 77 45 3816
8/19/2008 2008 8 19 80 68 99 83.5 51.5 3867.5
8/20/2008 2008 8 20 81 75 102 88.5 56.5 3924
8/21/2008 2008 8 21 82 61 100 80.5 48.5 3972.5
8/22/2008 2008 8 22 83 63 100 81.5 49.5 4022
8/23/2008 2008 8 23 84 61 102 81.5 49.5 4071.5
8/24/2008 2008 8 24 85 66 100 83 51 4122.5
8/25/2008 2008 8 25 86 77 97 87 55 4177.5
8/26/2008 2008 8 26 87 66 93 79.5 47.5 4225
8/27/2008 2008 8 27 88 66 99 82.5 50.5 4275.5
8/28/2008 2008 8 28 89 57 99 78 46 4321.5
8/29/2008 2008 8 29 90 61 90 75.5 43.5 4365
8/30/2008 2008 8 30 91 59 84 71.5 39.5 4404.5
8/31/2008 2008 8 31 92 66 77 71.5 39.5 4444
9/1/2008 2008 9 1 93 63 82 72.5 40.5 4484.5
9/2/2008 2008 9 2 94 57 70 63.5 31.5 4516
9/3/2008 2008 9 3 95 46 90 68 36 4552
9/4/2008 2008 9 4 96 46 90 68 36 4588
9/5/2008 2008 9 5 97 52 90 71 39 4627
9/6/2008 2008 9 6 98 50 90 70 38 4665
9/7/2008 2008 9 7 99 48 91 69.5 37.5 4702.5
9/8/2008 2008 9 8 100 55 90 72.5 40.5 4743
9/9/2008 2008 9 9 101 61 81 71 39 4782
9/10/2008 2008 9 10 102 55 84 69.5 37.5 4819.5
9/11/2008 2008 9 11 103 57 82 69.5 37.5 4857
9/12/2008 2008 9 12 104 46 79 62.5 30.5 4887.5
9/13/2008 2008 9 13 105 43 82 62.5 30.5 4918
9/14/2008 2008 9 14 106 45 86 65.5 33.5 4951.5
9/15/2008 2008 9 15 107 48 90 69 37 4988.5
9/16/2008 2008 9 16 108 48 90 69 37 5025.5
9/17/2008 2008 9 17 109 59 88 73.5 41.5 5067
9/18/2008 2008 9 18 110 50 88 69 37 5104
9/19/2008 2008 9 19 111 54 84 69 37 5141
9/20/2008 2008 9 20 112 57 86 71.5 39.5 5180.5
9/21/2008 2008 9 21 113 61 84 72.5 40.5 5221
9/22/2008 2008 9 22 114 70 81 75.5 43.5 5264.5
9/23/2008 2008 9 23 115 48 82 65 33 5297.5
9/24/2008 2008 9 24 116 45 88 66.5 34.5 5332
9/25/2008 2008 9 25 117 43 90 66.5 34.5 5366.5
9/26/2008 2008 9 26 118 55 91 73 41 5407.5
9/27/2008 2008 9 27 119 52 88 70 38 5445.5
9/28/2008 2008 9 28 120 54 88 71 39 5484.5
9/29/2008 2008 9 29 121 52 90 71 39 5523.5
9/30/2008 2008 9 30 122 46 90 68 36 5559.5
10/1/2008 2008 10 1 123 55 90 72.5 40.5 5600
10/2/2008 2008 10 2 124 46 86 66 34 5634
10/3/2008 2008 10 3 125 61 84 72.5 40.5 5674.5
10/4/2008 2008 10 4 126 55 70 62.5 30.5 5705
10/5/2008 2008 10 5 127 48 66 57 25 5730
10/6/2008 2008 10 6 128 43 73 58 26 5756
10/7/2008 2008 10 7 129 39 77 58 26 5782
10/8/2008 2008 10 8 130 41 81 61 29 5811
10/9/2008 2008 10 9 131 43 82 62.5 30.5 5841.5
10/10/2008 2008 10 10 132 54 77 65.5 33.5 5875
10/11/2008 2008 10 11 133 43 63 53 21 5896
10/12/2008 2008 10 12 134 37 55 46 14 5910
10/13/2008 2008 10 13 135 28 54 41 9 5919
10/14/2008 2008 10 14 136 27 64 45.5 13.5 5932.5
10/15/2008 2008 10 15 137 30 70 50 18 5950.5
10/16/2008 2008 10 16 138 30 79 54.5 22.5 5973
10/17/2008 2008 10 17 139 34 75 54.5 22.5 5995.5
10/18/2008 2008 10 18 140 36 79 57.5 25.5 6021
10/19/2008 2008 10 19 141 37 77 57 25 6046
10/20/2008 2008 10 20 142 55 73 64 32 6078
10/21/2008 2008 10 21 143 37 75 56 24 6102
10/22/2008 2008 10 22 144 30 57 43.5 11.5 6113.5
10/23/2008 2008 10 23 145 25 61 43 11 6124.5
10/24/2008 2008 10 24 146 28 70 49 17 6141.5
10/25/2008 2008 10 25 147 28 75 51.5 19.5 6161
10/26/2008 2008 10 26 148 36 73 54.5 22.5 6183.5
10/27/2008 2008 10 27 149 32 72 52 20 6203.5
10/28/2008 2008 10 28 150 32 52 42 10 6213.5
10/29/2008 2008 10 29 151 32 73 52.5 20.5 6234
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
10/30/2008 2008 10 30 152 30 79 54.5 22.5 6256.5
10/31/2008 2008 10 31 153 37 72 54.5 22.5 6279
11/1/2008 2008 11 1 154 45 73 59 27 6306
11/2/2008 2008 11 2 155 46 64 55 23 6329
11/3/2008 2008 11 3 156 34 64 49 17 6346
11/4/2008 2008 11 4 157 41 64 52.5 20.5 6366.5
11/5/2008 2008 11 5 158 36 48 42 10 6376.5
11/6/2008 2008 11 6 159 18 50 34 2 6378.5
11/7/2008 2008 11 7 160 19 52 35.5 3.5 6382
11/8/2008 2008 11 8 161 23 55 39 7 6389
11/9/2008 2008 11 9 162 32 54 43 11 6400
11/10/2008 2008 11 10 163 25 57 41 9 6409
11/11/2008 2008 11 11 164 50 55 52.5 20.5 6429.5
11/12/2008 2008 11 12 165 34 63 48.5 16.5 6446
11/13/2008 2008 11 13 166 34 70 52 20 6466
11/14/2008 2008 11 14 167 43 57 50 18 6484
11/15/2008 2008 11 15 168 28 55 41.5 9.5 6493.5
11/16/2008 2008 11 16 169 25 45 35 3 6496.5
11/17/2008 2008 11 17 170 23 63 43 11 6507.5
11/18/2008 2008 11 18 171 21 63 42 10 6517.5
11/19/2008 2008 11 19 172 19 64 41.5 9.5 6527
11/20/2008 2008 11 20 173 19 57 38 6 6533
11/21/2008 2008 11 21 174 19 57 38 6 6539
11/22/2008 2008 11 22 175 19 50 34.5 2.5 6541.5
11/23/2008 2008 11 23 176 16 37 26.5 -5.5 6536
11/24/2008 2008 11 24 177 16 55 35.5 3.5 6539.5
11/25/2008 2008 11 25 178 25 50 37.5 5.5 6545
11/26/2008 2008 11 26 179 30 46 38 6 6551
11/27/2008 2008 11 27 180 37 43 40 8 6559
11/28/2008 2008 11 28 181 39 54 46.5 14.5 6573.5
11/29/2008 2008 11 29 182 34 57 45.5 13.5 6587
11/30/2008 2008 11 30 183 39 63 51 19 6606
12/1/2008 2008 12 1 184 30 57 43.5 11.5 6617.5
12/2/2008 2008 12 2 185 30 55 42.5 10.5 6628
12/3/2008 2008 12 3 186 32 55 43.5 11.5 6639.5
12/4/2008 2008 12 4 187 23 48 35.5 3.5 6643
12/5/2008 2008 12 5 188 18 45 31.5 -0.5 6642.5
12/6/2008 2008 12 6 189 19 48 33.5 1.5 6644
12/7/2008 2008 12 7 190 21 45 33 1 6645
12/8/2008 2008 12 8 191 32 43 37.5 5.5 6650.5
12/9/2008 2008 12 9 192 25 45 35 3 6653.5
12/10/2008 2008 12 10 193 21 43 32 0 6653.5
12/11/2008 2008 12 11 194 19 46 32.5 0.5 6654
12/12/2008 2008 12 12 195 21 43 32 0 6654
12/13/2008 2008 12 13 196 28 54 41 9 6663
12/14/2008 2008 12 14 197 12 36 24 -8 6655
12/15/2008 2008 12 15 198 10 30 20 -12 6643
12/16/2008 2008 12 16 199 21 39 30 -2 6641
12/17/2008 2008 12 17 200 19 34 26.5 -5.5 6635.5
12/18/2008 2008 12 18 201 12 36 24 -8 6627.5
12/19/2008 2008 12 19 202 10 43 26.5 -5.5 6622
12/20/2008 2008 12 20 203 10 36 23 -9 6613
12/21/2008 2008 12 21 204 12 34 23 -9 6604
12/22/2008 2008 12 22 205 23 34 28.5 -3.5 6600.5
12/23/2008 2008 12 23 206 12 39 25.5 -6.5 6594
12/24/2008 2008 12 24 207 7 32 19.5 -12.5 6581.5
12/25/2008 2008 12 25 208 25 45 35 3 6584.5
12/26/2008 2008 12 26 209 23 36 29.5 -2.5 6582
12/27/2008 2008 12 27 210 12 32 22 -10 6572
12/28/2008 2008 12 28 211 10 28 19 -13 6559
12/29/2008 2008 12 29 212 9 36 22.5 -9.5 6549.5
12/30/2008 2008 12 30 213 10 32 21 -11 6538.5
12/31/2008 2008 12 31 214 10 34 22 -10 6528.5
1/1/2009 2009 1 1 215 10 34 22 -10 6518.5
1/2/2009 2009 1 2 216 12 36 24 -8 6510.5
1/3/2009 2009 1 3 217 21 37 29 -3 6507.5
1/4/2009 2009 1 4 218 5 30 17.5 -14.5 6493
1/5/2009 2009 1 5 219 1 25 13 -19 6474
1/6/2009 2009 1 6 220 9 32 20.5 -11.5 6462.5
1/7/2009 2009 1 7 221 9 37 23 -9 6453.5
1/8/2009 2009 1 8 222 12 43 27.5 -4.5 6449
1/9/2009 2009 1 9 223 25 46 35.5 3.5 6452.5
1/10/2009 2009 1 10 224 18 43 30.5 -1.5 6451
1/11/2009 2009 1 11 225 16 39 27.5 -4.5 6446.5
1/12/2009 2009 1 12 226 16 52 34 2 6448.5
1/13/2009 2009 1 13 227 18 46 32 0 6448.5
1/14/2009 2009 1 14 228 16 43 29.5 -2.5 6446
1/15/2009 2009 1 15 229 18 46 32 0 6446
1/16/2009 2009 1 16 230 19 45 32 0 6446
1/17/2009 2009 1 17 231 16 45 30.5 -1.5 6444.5
1/18/2009 2009 1 18 232 16 46 31 -1 6443.5
1/19/2009 2009 1 19 233 16 50 33 1 6444.5
1/20/2009 2009 1 20 234 18 52 35 3 6447.5
1/21/2009 2009 1 21 235 16 45 30.5 -1.5 6446
1/22/2009 2009 1 22 236 30 50 40 8 6454
1/23/2009 2009 1 23 237 30 54 42 10 6464
1/24/2009 2009 1 24 238 36 63 49.5 17.5 6481.5
1/25/2009 2009 1 25 239 43 52 47.5 15.5 6497
1/26/2009 2009 1 26 240 25 43 34 2 6499
1/27/2009 2009 1 27 241 3 34 18.5 -13.5 6485.5
1/28/2009 2009 1 28 242 12 43 27.5 -4.5 6481
1/29/2009 2009 1 29 243 18 46 32 0 6481
1/30/2009 2009 1 30 244 19 45 32 0 6481
1/31/2009 2009 1 31 245 18 52 35 3 6484
2/1/2009 2009 2 1 246 25 46 35.5 3.5 6487.5
2/2/2009 2009 2 2 247 18 52 35 3 6490.5
2/3/2009 2009 2 3 248 23 52 37.5 5.5 6496
2/4/2009 2009 2 4 249 19 55 37 5 6501
2/5/2009 2009 2 5 250 19 52 35.5 3.5 6504.5
2/6/2009 2009 2 6 251 25 57 41 9 6513.5
2/7/2009 2009 2 7 252 30 61 45.5 13.5 6527
2/8/2009 2009 2 8 253 27 48 37.5 5.5 6532.5
2/9/2009 2009 2 9 254 30 46 38 6 6538.5
2/10/2009 2009 2 10 255 27 46 36.5 4.5 6543
2/11/2009 2009 2 11 256 18 46 32 0 6543
2/12/2009 2009 2 12 257 27 45 36 4 6547
2/13/2009 2009 2 13 258 18 37 27.5 -4.5 6542.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
2/14/2009 2009 2 14 259 27 48 37.5 5.5 6548
2/15/2009 2009 2 15 260 18 46 32 0 6548
2/16/2009 2009 2 16 261 25 52 38.5 6.5 6554.5
2/17/2009 2009 2 17 262 37 52 44.5 12.5 6567
2/18/2009 2009 2 18 263 18 50 34 2 6569
2/19/2009 2009 2 19 264 19 54 36.5 4.5 6573.5
2/20/2009 2009 2 20 265 12 52 32 0 6573.5
2/21/2009 2009 2 21 266 16 55 35.5 3.5 6577
2/22/2009 2009 2 22 267 30 54 42 10 6587
2/23/2009 2009 2 23 268 37 50 43.5 11.5 6598.5
2/24/2009 2009 2 24 269 30 64 47 15 6613.5
2/25/2009 2009 2 25 270 32 61 46.5 14.5 6628
2/26/2009 2009 2 26 271 28 66 47 15 6643
2/27/2009 2009 2 27 272 27 52 39.5 7.5 6650.5
2/28/2009 2009 2 28 273 19 52 35.5 3.5 6654
3/1/2009 2009 3 1 274 19 48 33.5 1.5 6655.5
3/2/2009 2009 3 2 275 27 70 48.5 16.5 6672
3/3/2009 2009 3 3 276 50 73 61.5 29.5 6701.5
3/4/2009 2009 3 4 277 55 70 62.5 30.5 6732
3/5/2009 2009 3 5 278 39 57 48 16 6748
3/6/2009 2009 3 6 279 34 54 44 12 6760
3/7/2009 2009 3 7 280 34 50 42 10 6770
3/8/2009 2009 3 8 281 27 57 42 10 6780
3/9/2009 2009 3 9 282 39 54 46.5 14.5 6794.5
3/10/2009 2009 3 10 283 27 50 38.5 6.5 6801
3/11/2009 2009 3 11 284 21 57 39 7 6808
3/12/2009 2009 3 12 285 36 59 47.5 15.5 6823.5
3/13/2009 2009 3 13 286 28 61 44.5 12.5 6836
3/14/2009 2009 3 14 287 21 66 43.5 11.5 6847.5
3/15/2009 2009 3 15 288 45 70 57.5 25.5 6873
3/16/2009 2009 3 16 289 36 55 45.5 13.5 6886.5
3/17/2009 2009 3 17 290 36 73 54.5 22.5 6909
3/18/2009 2009 3 18 291 36 75 55.5 23.5 6932.5
3/19/2009 2009 3 19 292 54 73 63.5 31.5 6964
3/20/2009 2009 3 20 293 43 81 62 30 6994
3/21/2009 2009 3 21 294 39 73 56 24 7018
3/22/2009 2009 3 22 295 45 66 55.5 23.5 7041.5
3/23/2009 2009 3 23 296 43 52 47.5 15.5 7057
3/24/2009 2009 3 24 297 36 55 45.5 13.5 7070.5
3/25/2009 2009 3 25 298 36 59 47.5 15.5 7086
3/26/2009 2009 3 26 299 36 48 42 10 7096
3/27/2009 2009 3 27 300 21 55 38 6 7102
3/28/2009 2009 3 28 301 27 66 46.5 14.5 7116.5
3/29/2009 2009 3 29 302 34 70 52 20 7136.5
3/30/2009 2009 3 30 303 34 46 40 8 7144.5
3/31/2009 2009 3 31 304 25 55 40 8 7152.5
4/1/2009 2009 4 1 305 39 50 44.5 12.5 7165
4/2/2009 2009 4 2 306 25 61 43 11 7176
4/3/2009 2009 4 3 307 37 50 43.5 11.5 7187.5
4/4/2009 2009 4 4 308 37 46 41.5 9.5 7197
4/5/2009 2009 4 5 309 28 55 41.5 9.5 7206.5
4/6/2009 2009 4 6 310 28 57 42.5 10.5 7217
4/7/2009 2009 4 7 311 25 72 48.5 16.5 7233.5
4/8/2009 2009 4 8 312 37 64 50.5 18.5 7252
4/9/2009 2009 4 9 313 37 64 50.5 18.5 7270.5
4/10/2009 2009 4 10 314 45 61 53 21 7291.5
4/11/2009 2009 4 11 315 46 55 50.5 18.5 7310
4/12/2009 2009 4 12 316 46 66 56 24 7334
4/13/2009 2009 4 13 317 37 82 59.5 27.5 7361.5
4/14/2009 2009 4 14 318 52 70 61 29 7390.5
4/15/2009 2009 4 15 319 43 57 50 18 7408.5
4/16/2009 2009 4 16 320 41 54 47.5 15.5 7424
4/17/2009 2009 4 17 321 45 61 53 21 7445
4/18/2009 2009 4 18 322 46 68 57 25 7470
4/19/2009 2009 4 19 323 43 75 59 27 7497
4/20/2009 2009 4 20 324 39 81 60 28 7525
4/21/2009 2009 4 21 325 63 84 73.5 41.5 7566.5
4/22/2009 2009 4 22 326 45 86 65.5 33.5 7600
4/23/2009 2009 4 23 327 45 82 63.5 31.5 7631.5
4/24/2009 2009 4 24 328 66 79 72.5 40.5 7672
4/25/2009 2009 4 25 329 45 63 54 22 7694
4/26/2009 2009 4 26 330 37 64 50.5 18.5 7712.5
4/27/2009 2009 4 27 331 36 70 53 21 7733.5
4/28/2009 2009 4 28 332 61 79 70 38 7771.5
4/29/2009 2009 4 29 333 54 81 67.5 35.5 7807
4/30/2009 2009 4 30 334 48 84 66 34 7841
5/1/2009 2009 5 1 335 50 81 65.5 33.5 7874.5
5/2/2009 2009 5 2 336 57 73 65 33 7907.5
5/3/2009 2009 5 3 337 57 73 65 33 7940.5
5/4/2009 2009 5 4 338 55 75 65 33 7973.5
5/5/2009 2009 5 5 339 57 84 70.5 38.5 8012
5/6/2009 2009 5 6 340 48 91 69.5 37.5 8049.5
5/7/2009 2009 5 7 341 52 86 69 37 8086.5
5/8/2009 2009 5 8 342 52 81 66.5 34.5 8121
5/9/2009 2009 5 9 343 45 81 63 31 8152
5/10/2009 2009 5 10 344 52 82 67 35 8187
5/11/2009 2009 5 11 345 46 90 68 36 8223
5/12/2009 2009 5 12 346 55 93 74 42 8265
5/13/2009 2009 5 13 347 55 75 65 33 8298
5/14/2009 2009 5 14 348 45 86 65.5 33.5 8331.5
5/15/2009 2009 5 15 349 55 84 69.5 37.5 8369
5/16/2009 2009 5 16 350 52 88 70 38 8407
5/17/2009 2009 5 17 351 46 93 69.5 37.5 8444.5
5/18/2009 2009 5 18 352 50 97 73.5 41.5 8486
5/19/2009 2009 5 19 353 66 88 77 45 8531
5/20/2009 2009 5 20 354 55 88 71.5 39.5 8570.5
5/21/2009 2009 5 21 355 61 86 73.5 41.5 8612
5/22/2009 2009 5 22 356 63 75 69 37 8649
5/23/2009 2009 5 23 357 59 63 61 29 8678
5/24/2009 2009 5 24 358 57 75 66 34 8712
5/25/2009 2009 5 25 359 54 75 64.5 32.5 8744.5
5/26/2009 2009 5 26 360 55 77 66 34 8778.5
5/27/2009 2009 5 27 361 54 81 67.5 35.5 8814
5/28/2009 2009 5 28 362 55 84 69.5 37.5 8851.5
5/29/2009 2009 5 29 363 57 84 70.5 38.5 8890
5/30/2009 2009 5 30 364 55 84 69.5 37.5 8927.5
5/31/2009 2009 5 31 365 57 86 71.5 39.5 8967
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
6/1/2009 2009 6 1 1 61 86 73.5 41.5 41.5
6/2/2009 2009 6 2 2 63 84 73.5 41.5 83
6/3/2009 2009 6 3 3 61 90 75.5 43.5 126.5
6/4/2009 2009 6 4 4 57 90 73.5 41.5 168
6/5/2009 2009 6 5 5 64 82 73 41 209
6/6/2009 2009 6 6 6 54 73 63.5 31.5 240.5
6/7/2009 2009 6 7 7 63 81 72 40 280.5
6/8/2009 2009 6 8 8 54 84 69 37 317.5
6/9/2009 2009 6 9 9 68 77 72.5 40.5 358
6/10/2009 2009 6 10 10 55 77 66 34 392
6/11/2009 2009 6 11 11 61 81 71 39 431
6/12/2009 2009 6 12 12 64 82 73 41 472
6/13/2009 2009 6 13 13 59 84 71.5 39.5 511.5
6/14/2009 2009 6 14 14 57 84 70.5 38.5 550
6/15/2009 2009 6 15 15 57 84 70.5 38.5 588.5
6/16/2009 2009 6 16 16 66 81 73.5 41.5 630
6/17/2009 2009 6 17 17 63 79 71 39 669
6/18/2009 2009 6 18 18 54 75 64.5 32.5 701.5
6/19/2009 2009 6 19 19 48 84 66 34 735.5
6/20/2009 2009 6 20 20 57 81 69 37 772.5
6/21/2009 2009 6 21 21 61 88 74.5 42.5 815
6/22/2009 2009 6 22 22 57 93 75 43 858
6/23/2009 2009 6 23 23 54 93 73.5 41.5 899.5
6/24/2009 2009 6 24 24 64 100 82 50 949.5
6/25/2009 2009 6 25 25 72 91 81.5 49.5 999
6/26/2009 2009 6 26 26 63 81 72 40 1039
6/27/2009 2009 6 27 27 55 86 70.5 38.5 1077.5
6/28/2009 2009 6 28 28 59 97 78 46 1123.5
6/29/2009 2009 6 29 29 61 97 79 47 1170.5
6/30/2009 2009 6 30 30 59 100 79.5 47.5 1218
7/1/2009 2009 7 1 31 64 100 82 50 1268
7/2/2009 2009 7 2 32 72 84 78 46 1314
7/3/2009 2009 7 3 33 75 95 85 53 1367
7/4/2009 2009 7 4 34 66 97 81.5 49.5 1416.5
7/5/2009 2009 7 5 35 63 97 80 48 1464.5
7/6/2009 2009 7 6 36 68 102 85 53 1517.5
7/7/2009 2009 7 7 37 61 99 80 48 1565.5
7/8/2009 2009 7 8 38 81 100 90.5 58.5 1624
7/9/2009 2009 7 9 39 70 100 85 53 1677
7/10/2009 2009 7 10 40 57 100 78.5 46.5 1723.5
7/11/2009 2009 7 11 41 77 102 89.5 57.5 1781
7/12/2009 2009 7 12 42 70 100 85 53 1834
7/13/2009 2009 7 13 43 66 102 84 52 1886
7/14/2009 2009 7 14 44 70 100 85 53 1939
7/15/2009 2009 7 15 45 70 93 81.5 49.5 1988.5
7/16/2009 2009 7 16 46 63 106 84.5 52.5 2041
7/17/2009 2009 7 17 47 63 109 86 54 2095
7/18/2009 2009 7 18 48 64 109 86.5 54.5 2149.5
7/19/2009 2009 7 19 49 68 97 82.5 50.5 2200
7/20/2009 2009 7 20 50 79 91 85 53 2253
7/21/2009 2009 7 21 51 72 100 86 54 2307
7/22/2009 2009 7 22 52 63 102 82.5 50.5 2357.5
7/23/2009 2009 7 23 53 63 102 82.5 50.5 2408
7/24/2009 2009 7 24 54 73 100 86.5 54.5 2462.5
7/25/2009 2009 7 25 55 75 100 87.5 55.5 2518
7/26/2009 2009 7 26 56 70 99 84.5 52.5 2570.5
7/27/2009 2009 7 27 57 64 100 82 50 2620.5
7/28/2009 2009 7 28 58 63 99 81 49 2669.5
7/29/2009 2009 7 29 59 68 90 79 47 2716.5
7/30/2009 2009 7 30 60 61 97 79 47 2763.5
7/31/2009 2009 7 31 61 66 97 81.5 49.5 2813
8/1/2009 2009 8 1 62 61 97 79 47 2860
8/2/2009 2009 8 2 63 66 102 84 52 2912
8/3/2009 2009 8 3 64 61 106 83.5 51.5 2963.5
8/4/2009 2009 8 4 65 75 102 88.5 56.5 3020
8/5/2009 2009 8 5 66 63 99 81 49 3069
8/6/2009 2009 8 6 67 63 97 80 48 3117
8/7/2009 2009 8 7 68 70 91 80.5 48.5 3165.5
8/8/2009 2009 8 8 69 55 88 71.5 39.5 3205
8/9/2009 2009 8 9 70 63 90 76.5 44.5 3249.5
8/10/2009 2009 8 10 71 55 95 75 43 3292.5
8/11/2009 2009 8 11 72 57 99 78 46 3338.5
8/12/2009 2009 8 12 73 54 86 70 38 3376.5
8/13/2009 2009 8 13 74 64 90 77 45 3421.5
8/14/2009 2009 8 14 75 66 88 77 45 3466.5
8/15/2009 2009 8 15 76 57 90 73.5 41.5 3508
8/16/2009 2009 8 16 77 55 91 73 41 3549
8/17/2009 2009 8 17 78 52 90 71 39 3588
8/18/2009 2009 8 18 79 57 91 74 42 3630
8/19/2009 2009 8 19 80 55 97 76 44 3674
8/20/2009 2009 8 20 81 57 97 77 45 3719
8/21/2009 2009 8 21 82 57 102 79.5 47.5 3766.5
8/22/2009 2009 8 22 83 57 99 78 46 3812.5
8/23/2009 2009 8 23 84 77 90 83.5 51.5 3864
8/24/2009 2009 8 24 85 72 86 79 47 3911
8/25/2009 2009 8 25 86 63 93 78 46 3957
8/26/2009 2009 8 26 87 54 95 74.5 42.5 3999.5
8/27/2009 2009 8 27 88 59 95 77 45 4044.5
8/28/2009 2009 8 28 89 55 95 75 43 4087.5
8/29/2009 2009 8 29 90 61 97 79 47 4134.5
8/30/2009 2009 8 30 91 68 95 81.5 49.5 4184
8/31/2009 2009 8 31 92 63 97 80 48 4232
9/1/2009 2009 9 1 93 61 93 77 45 4277
9/2/2009 2009 9 2 94 66 97 81.5 49.5 4326.5
9/3/2009 2009 9 3 95 63 91 77 45 4371.5
9/4/2009 2009 9 4 96 61 86 73.5 41.5 4413
9/5/2009 2009 9 5 97 70 82 76 44 4457
9/6/2009 2009 9 6 98 63 91 77 45 4502
9/7/2009 2009 9 7 99 57 91 74 42 4544
9/8/2009 2009 9 8 100 61 91 76 44 4588
9/9/2009 2009 9 9 101 57 95 76 44 4632
9/10/2009 2009 9 10 102 63 93 78 46 4678
9/11/2009 2009 9 11 103 57 81 69 37 4715
9/12/2009 2009 9 12 104 59 93 76 44 4759
9/13/2009 2009 9 13 105 61 84 72.5 40.5 4799.5
9/14/2009 2009 9 14 106 55 77 66 34 4833.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
9/15/2009 2009 9 15 107 57 72 64.5 32.5 4866
9/16/2009 2009 9 16 108 52 79 65.5 33.5 4899.5
9/17/2009 2009 9 17 109 57 81 69 37 4936.5
9/18/2009 2009 9 18 110 57 84 70.5 38.5 4975
9/19/2009 2009 9 19 111 55 88 71.5 39.5 5014.5
9/20/2009 2009 9 20 112 61 90 75.5 43.5 5058
9/21/2009 2009 9 21 113 55 72 63.5 31.5 5089.5
9/22/2009 2009 9 22 114 43 72 57.5 25.5 5115
9/23/2009 2009 9 23 115 39 75 57 25 5140
9/24/2009 2009 9 24 116 46 81 63.5 31.5 5171.5
9/25/2009 2009 9 25 117 46 90 68 36 5207.5
9/26/2009 2009 9 26 118 46 91 68.5 36.5 5244
9/27/2009 2009 9 27 119 45 93 69 37 5281
9/28/2009 2009 9 28 120 45 91 68 36 5317
9/29/2009 2009 9 29 121 54 88 71 39 5356
9/30/2009 2009 9 30 122 46 73 59.5 27.5 5383.5
10/1/2009 2009 10 1 123 39 63 51 19 5402.5
10/2/2009 2009 10 2 124 28 66 47 15 5417.5
10/3/2009 2009 10 3 125 34 73 53.5 21.5 5439
10/4/2009 2009 10 4 126 55 79 67 35 5474
10/5/2009 2009 10 5 127 46 61 53.5 21.5 5495.5
10/6/2009 2009 10 6 128 28 57 42.5 10.5 5506
10/7/2009 2009 10 7 129 36 70 53 21 5527
10/8/2009 2009 10 8 130 41 61 51 19 5546
10/9/2009 2009 10 9 131 36 72 54 22 5568
10/10/2009 2009 10 10 132 34 72 53 21 5589
10/11/2009 2009 10 11 133 36 73 54.5 22.5 5611.5
10/12/2009 2009 10 12 134 54 73 63.5 31.5 5643
10/13/2009 2009 10 13 135 61 68 64.5 32.5 5675.5
10/14/2009 2009 10 14 136 52 75 63.5 31.5 5707
10/15/2009 2009 10 15 137 43 75 59 27 5734
10/16/2009 2009 10 16 138 43 73 58 26 5760
10/17/2009 2009 10 17 139 32 77 54.5 22.5 5782.5
10/18/2009 2009 10 18 140 37 84 60.5 28.5 5811
10/19/2009 2009 10 19 141 59 82 70.5 38.5 5849.5
10/20/2009 2009 10 20 142 52 64 58 26 5875.5
10/21/2009 2009 10 21 143 45 64 54.5 22.5 5898
10/22/2009 2009 10 22 144 36 64 50 18 5916
10/23/2009 2009 10 23 145 34 66 50 18 5934
10/24/2009 2009 10 24 146 43 72 57.5 25.5 5959.5
10/25/2009 2009 10 25 147 39 61 50 18 5977.5
10/26/2009 2009 10 26 148 23 57 40 8 5985.5
10/27/2009 2009 10 27 149 37 52 44.5 12.5 5998
10/28/2009 2009 10 28 150 30 43 36.5 4.5 6002.5
10/29/2009 2009 10 29 151 36 45 40.5 8.5 6011
10/30/2009 2009 10 30 152 34 55 44.5 12.5 6023.5
10/31/2009 2009 10 31 153 21 59 40 8 6031.5
11/1/2009 2009 11 1 154 21 64 42.5 10.5 6042
11/2/2009 2009 11 2 155 25 66 45.5 13.5 6055.5
11/3/2009 2009 11 3 156 25 46 35.5 3.5 6059
11/4/2009 2009 11 4 157 25 66 45.5 13.5 6072.5
11/5/2009 2009 11 5 158 25 70 47.5 15.5 6088
11/6/2009 2009 11 6 159 32 77 54.5 22.5 6110.5
11/7/2009 2009 11 7 160 36 72 54 22 6132.5
11/8/2009 2009 11 8 161 36 64 50 18 6150.5
11/9/2009 2009 11 9 162 28 63 45.5 13.5 6164
11/10/2009 2009 11 10 163 30 63 46.5 14.5 6178.5
11/11/2009 2009 11 11 164 41 63 52 20 6198.5
11/12/2009 2009 11 12 165 59 72 65.5 33.5 6232
11/13/2009 2009 11 13 166 46 55 50.5 18.5 6250.5
11/14/2009 2009 11 14 167 34 52 43 11 6261.5
11/15/2009 2009 11 15 168 25 48 36.5 4.5 6266
11/16/2009 2009 11 16 169 10 46 28 -4 6262
11/17/2009 2009 11 17 170 14 50 32 0 6262
11/18/2009 2009 11 18 171 14 50 32 0 6262
11/19/2009 2009 11 19 172 19 55 37 5 6267
11/20/2009 2009 11 20 173 14 50 32 0 6267
11/21/2009 2009 11 21 174 27 54 40.5 8.5 6275.5
11/22/2009 2009 11 22 175 21 52 36.5 4.5 6280
11/23/2009 2009 11 23 176 21 48 34.5 2.5 6282.5
11/24/2009 2009 11 24 177 10 45 27.5 -4.5 6278
11/25/2009 2009 11 25 178 10 50 30 -2 6276
11/26/2009 2009 11 26 179 10 54 32 0 6276
11/27/2009 2009 11 27 180 16 48 32 0 6276
11/28/2009 2009 11 28 181 25 50 37.5 5.5 6281.5
11/29/2009 2009 11 29 182 30 57 43.5 11.5 6293
11/30/2009 2009 11 30 183 14 52 33 1 6294
12/1/2009 2009 12 1 184 9 50 29.5 -2.5 6291.5
12/2/2009 2009 12 2 185 12 46 29 -3 6288.5
12/3/2009 2009 12 3 186 5 46 25.5 -6.5 6282
12/4/2009 2009 12 4 187 -2 34 16 -16 6266
12/5/2009 2009 12 5 188 5 32 18.5 -13.5 6252.5
12/6/2009 2009 12 6 189 16 37 26.5 -5.5 6247
12/7/2009 2009 12 7 190 23 30 26.5 -5.5 6241.5
12/8/2009 2009 12 8 191 5 34 19.5 -12.5 6229
12/9/2009 2009 12 9 192 -8 23 7.5 -24.5 6204.5
12/10/2009 2009 12 10 193 -11 18 3.5 -28.5 6176
12/11/2009 2009 12 11 194 -11 21 5 -27 6149
12/12/2009 2009 12 12 195 10 28 19 -13 6136
12/13/2009 2009 12 13 196 23 45 34 2 6138
12/14/2009 2009 12 14 197 19 43 31 -1 6137
12/15/2009 2009 12 15 198 16 34 25 -7 6130
12/16/2009 2009 12 16 199 25 37 31 -1 6129
12/17/2009 2009 12 17 200 18 39 28.5 -3.5 6125.5
12/18/2009 2009 12 18 201 16 36 26 -6 6119.5
12/19/2009 2009 12 19 202 16 39 27.5 -4.5 6115
12/20/2009 2009 12 20 203 14 32 23 -9 6106
12/21/2009 2009 12 21 204 14 32 23 -9 6097
12/22/2009 2009 12 22 205 21 30 25.5 -6.5 6090.5
12/23/2009 2009 12 23 206 21 46 33.5 1.5 6092
12/24/2009 2009 12 24 207 16 32 24 -8 6084
12/25/2009 2009 12 25 208 9 34 21.5 -10.5 6073.5
12/26/2009 2009 12 26 209 3 32 17.5 -14.5 6059
12/27/2009 2009 12 27 210 1 30 15.5 -16.5 6042.5
12/28/2009 2009 12 28 211 3 27 15 -17 6025.5
12/29/2009 2009 12 29 212 18 45 31.5 -0.5 6025
12/30/2009 2009 12 30 213 16 30 23 -9 6016
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
12/31/2009 2009 12 31 214 10 32 21 -11 6005
1/1/2010 2010 1 1 215 12 28 20 -12 5993
1/2/2010 2010 1 2 216 16 34 25 -7 5986
1/3/2010 2010 1 3 217 5 36 20.5 -11.5 5974.5
1/4/2010 2010 1 4 218 7 37 22 -10 5964.5
1/5/2010 2010 1 5 219 7 30 18.5 -13.5 5951
1/6/2010 2010 1 6 220 9 36 22.5 -9.5 5941.5
1/7/2010 2010 1 7 221 16 34 25 -7 5934.5
1/8/2010 2010 1 8 222 14 32 23 -9 5925.5
1/9/2010 2010 1 9 223 9 36 22.5 -9.5 5916
1/10/2010 2010 1 10 224 9 36 22.5 -9.5 5906.5
1/11/2010 2010 1 11 225 7 34 20.5 -11.5 5895
1/12/2010 2010 1 12 226 7 34 20.5 -11.5 5883.5
1/13/2010 2010 1 13 227 10 36 23 -9 5874.5
1/14/2010 2010 1 14 228 16 45 30.5 -1.5 5873
1/15/2010 2010 1 15 229 10 43 26.5 -5.5 5867.5
1/16/2010 2010 1 16 230 18 39 28.5 -3.5 5864
1/17/2010 2010 1 17 231 19 39 29 -3 5861
1/18/2010 2010 1 18 232 27 39 33 1 5862
1/19/2010 2010 1 19 233 32 52 42 10 5872
1/20/2010 2010 1 20 234 32 45 38.5 6.5 5878.5
1/21/2010 2010 1 21 235 34 43 38.5 6.5 5885
1/22/2010 2010 1 22 236 32 45 38.5 6.5 5891.5
1/23/2010 2010 1 23 237 27 43 35 3 5894.5
1/24/2010 2010 1 24 238 25 43 34 2 5896.5
1/25/2010 2010 1 25 239 21 36 28.5 -3.5 5893
1/26/2010 2010 1 26 240 25 37 31 -1 5892
1/27/2010 2010 1 27 241 27 30 28.5 -3.5 5888.5
1/28/2010 2010 1 28 242 25 41 33 1 5889.5
1/29/2010 2010 1 29 243 18 34 26 -6 5883.5
1/30/2010 2010 1 30 244 18 32 25 -7 5876.5
1/31/2010 2010 1 31 245 27 36 31.5 -0.5 5876
2/1/2010 2010 2 1 246 25 37 31 -1 5875
2/2/2010 2010 2 2 247 27 32 29.5 -2.5 5872.5
2/3/2010 2010 2 3 248 21 34 27.5 -4.5 5868
2/4/2010 2010 2 4 249 18 37 27.5 -4.5 5863.5
2/5/2010 2010 2 5 250 27 36 31.5 -0.5 5863
2/6/2010 2010 2 6 251 30 37 33.5 1.5 5864.5
2/7/2010 2010 2 7 252 34 37 35.5 3.5 5868
2/8/2010 2010 2 8 253 27 39 33 1 5869
2/9/2010 2010 2 9 254 23 34 28.5 -3.5 5865.5
2/10/2010 2010 2 10 255 19 39 29 -3 5862.5
2/11/2010 2010 2 11 256 25 43 34 2 5864.5
2/12/2010 2010 2 12 257 25 39 32 0 5864.5
2/13/2010 2010 2 13 258 25 46 35.5 3.5 5868
2/14/2010 2010 2 14 259 28 46 37 5 5873
2/15/2010 2010 2 15 260 27 39 33 1 5874
2/16/2010 2010 2 16 261 21 45 33 1 5875
2/17/2010 2010 2 17 262 25 43 34 2 5877
2/18/2010 2010 2 18 263 23 43 33 1 5878
2/19/2010 2010 2 19 264 30 37 33.5 1.5 5879.5
2/20/2010 2010 2 20 265 28 39 33.5 1.5 5881
2/21/2010 2010 2 21 266 30 37 33.5 1.5 5882.5
2/22/2010 2010 2 22 267 25 36 30.5 -1.5 5881
2/23/2010 2010 2 23 268 19 39 29 -3 5878
2/24/2010 2010 2 24 269 25 34 29.5 -2.5 5875.5
2/25/2010 2010 2 25 270 28 43 35.5 3.5 5879
2/26/2010 2010 2 26 271 25 46 35.5 3.5 5882.5
2/27/2010 2010 2 27 272 30 45 37.5 5.5 5888
2/28/2010 2010 2 28 273 34 50 42 10 5898
3/1/2010 2010 3 1 274 28 55 41.5 9.5 5907.5
3/2/2010 2010 3 2 275 25 54 39.5 7.5 5915
3/3/2010 2010 3 3 276 28 57 42.5 10.5 5925.5
3/4/2010 2010 3 4 277 27 55 41 9 5934.5
3/5/2010 2010 3 5 278 28 55 41.5 9.5 5944
3/6/2010 2010 3 6 279 28 50 39 7 5951
3/7/2010 2010 3 7 280 36 50 43 11 5962
3/8/2010 2010 3 8 281 37 55 46 14 5976
3/9/2010 2010 3 9 282 34 50 42 10 5986
3/10/2010 2010 3 10 283 32 43 37.5 5.5 5991.5
3/11/2010 2010 3 11 284 34 50 42 10 6001.5
3/12/2010 2010 3 12 285 27 52 39.5 7.5 6009
3/13/2010 2010 3 13 286 28 61 44.5 12.5 6021.5
3/14/2010 2010 3 14 287 36 43 39.5 7.5 6029
3/15/2010 2010 3 15 288 32 61 46.5 14.5 6043.5
3/16/2010 2010 3 16 289 32 63 47.5 15.5 6059
3/17/2010 2010 3 17 290 30 55 42.5 10.5 6069.5
3/18/2010 2010 3 18 291 34 63 48.5 16.5 6086
3/19/2010 2010 3 19 292 37 52 44.5 12.5 6098.5
3/20/2010 2010 3 20 293 27 55 41 9 6107.5
3/21/2010 2010 3 21 294 27 57 42 10 6117.5
3/22/2010 2010 3 22 295 28 70 49 17 6134.5
3/23/2010 2010 3 23 296 41 55 48 16 6150.5
3/24/2010 2010 3 24 297 30 61 45.5 13.5 6164
3/25/2010 2010 3 25 298 27 64 45.5 13.5 6177.5
3/26/2010 2010 3 26 299 39 54 46.5 14.5 6192
3/27/2010 2010 3 27 300 36 61 48.5 16.5 6208.5
3/28/2010 2010 3 28 301 27 68 47.5 15.5 6224
3/29/2010 2010 3 29 302 30 72 51 19 6243
3/30/2010 2010 3 30 303 55 79 67 35 6278
3/31/2010 2010 3 31 304 50 66 58 26 6304
4/1/2010 2010 4 1 305 37 52 44.5 12.5 6316.5
4/2/2010 2010 4 2 306 36 54 45 13 6329.5
4/3/2010 2010 4 3 307 48 64 56 24 6353.5
4/4/2010 2010 4 4 308 41 64 52.5 20.5 6374
4/5/2010 2010 4 5 309 39 66 52.5 20.5 6394.5
4/6/2010 2010 4 6 310 32 50 41 9 6403.5
4/7/2010 2010 4 7 311 34 55 44.5 12.5 6416
4/8/2010 2010 4 8 312 27 66 46.5 14.5 6430.5
4/9/2010 2010 4 9 313 30 77 53.5 21.5 6452
4/10/2010 2010 4 10 314 37 75 56 24 6476
4/11/2010 2010 4 11 315 61 81 71 39 6515
4/12/2010 2010 4 12 316 55 75 65 33 6548
4/13/2010 2010 4 13 317 43 61 52 20 6568
4/14/2010 2010 4 14 318 30 70 50 18 6586
4/15/2010 2010 4 15 319 37 75 56 24 6610
4/16/2010 2010 4 16 320 48 73 60.5 28.5 6638.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
4/17/2010 2010 4 17 321 52 81 66.5 34.5 6673
4/18/2010 2010 4 18 322 57 79 68 36 6709
4/19/2010 2010 4 19 323 43 82 62.5 30.5 6739.5
4/20/2010 2010 4 20 324 45 77 61 29 6768.5
4/21/2010 2010 4 21 325 52 70 61 29 6797.5
4/22/2010 2010 4 22 326 45 63 54 22 6819.5
4/23/2010 2010 4 23 327 43 61 52 20 6839.5
4/24/2010 2010 4 24 328 45 75 60 28 6867.5
4/25/2010 2010 4 25 329 37 70 53.5 21.5 6889
4/26/2010 2010 4 26 330 43 75 59 27 6916
4/27/2010 2010 4 27 331 39 72 55.5 23.5 6939.5
4/28/2010 2010 4 28 332 48 79 63.5 31.5 6971
4/29/2010 2010 4 29 333 39 54 46.5 14.5 6985.5
4/30/2010 2010 4 30 334 45 57 51 19 7004.5
5/1/2010 2010 5 1 335 32 57 44.5 12.5 7017
5/2/2010 2010 5 2 336 39 63 51 19 7036
5/3/2010 2010 5 3 337 34 72 53 21 7057
5/4/2010 2010 5 4 338 54 88 71 39 7096
5/5/2010 2010 5 5 339 43 82 62.5 30.5 7126.5
5/6/2010 2010 5 6 340 48 64 56 24 7150.5
5/7/2010 2010 5 7 341 30 64 47 15 7165.5
5/8/2010 2010 5 8 342 34 81 57.5 25.5 7191
5/9/2010 2010 5 9 343 43 82 62.5 30.5 7221.5
5/10/2010 2010 5 10 344 55 75 65 33 7254.5
5/11/2010 2010 5 11 345 43 61 52 20 7274.5
5/12/2010 2010 5 12 346 34 55 44.5 12.5 7287
5/13/2010 2010 5 13 347 48 66 57 25 7312
5/14/2010 2010 5 14 348 43 63 53 21 7333
5/15/2010 2010 5 15 349 37 57 47 15 7348
5/16/2010 2010 5 16 350 45 81 63 31 7379
5/17/2010 2010 5 17 351 45 84 64.5 32.5 7411.5
5/18/2010 2010 5 18 352 57 66 61.5 29.5 7441
5/19/2010 2010 5 19 353 46 75 60.5 28.5 7469.5
5/20/2010 2010 5 20 354 46 84 65 33 7502.5
5/21/2010 2010 5 21 355 48 90 69 37 7539.5
5/22/2010 2010 5 22 356 64 77 70.5 38.5 7578
5/23/2010 2010 5 23 357 46 73 59.5 27.5 7605.5
5/24/2010 2010 5 24 358 45 64 54.5 22.5 7628
5/25/2010 2010 5 25 359 39 66 52.5 20.5 7648.5
5/26/2010 2010 5 26 360 48 64 56 24 7672.5
5/27/2010 2010 5 27 361 57 90 73.5 41.5 7714
5/28/2010 2010 5 28 362 66 88 77 45 7759
5/29/2010 2010 5 29 363 55 79 67 35 7794
5/30/2010 2010 5 30 364 39 81 60 28 7822
5/31/2010 2010 5 31 365 61 88 74.5 42.5 7864.5
6/1/2010 2010 6 1 1 57 86 71.5 39.5 39.5
6/2/2010 2010 6 2 2 63 91 77 45 84.5
6/3/2010 2010 6 3 3 64 91 77.5 45.5 130
6/4/2010 2010 6 4 4 61 97 79 47 177
6/5/2010 2010 6 5 5 68 104 86 54 231
6/6/2010 2010 6 6 6 63 100 81.5 49.5 280.5
6/7/2010 2010 6 7 7 57 102 79.5 47.5 328
6/8/2010 2010 6 8 8 70 95 82.5 50.5 378.5
6/9/2010 2010 6 9 9 84 97 90.5 58.5 437
6/10/2010 2010 6 10 10 73 95 84 52 489
6/11/2010 2010 6 11 11 63 88 75.5 43.5 532.5
6/12/2010 2010 6 12 12 54 72 63 31 563.5
6/13/2010 2010 6 13 13 48 66 57 25 588.5
6/14/2010 2010 6 14 14 46 79 62.5 30.5 619
6/15/2010 2010 6 15 15 70 90 80 48 667
6/16/2010 2010 6 16 16 61 90 75.5 43.5 710.5
6/17/2010 2010 6 17 17 54 88 71 39 749.5
6/18/2010 2010 6 18 18 64 93 78.5 46.5 796
6/19/2010 2010 6 19 19 57 93 75 43 839
6/20/2010 2010 6 20 20 57 91 74 42 881
6/21/2010 2010 6 21 21 52 91 71.5 39.5 920.5
6/22/2010 2010 6 22 22 52 70 61 29 949.5
6/23/2010 2010 6 23 23 52 93 72.5 40.5 990
6/24/2010 2010 6 24 24 54 102 78 46 1036
6/25/2010 2010 6 25 25 57 88 72.5 40.5 1076.5
6/26/2010 2010 6 26 26 61 97 79 47 1123.5
6/27/2010 2010 6 27 27 63 99 81 49 1172.5
6/28/2010 2010 6 28 28 57 100 78.5 46.5 1219
6/29/2010 2010 6 29 29 77 97 87 55 1274
6/30/2010 2010 6 30 30 75 97 86 54 1328
7/1/2010 2010 7 1 31 68 99 83.5 51.5 1379.5
7/2/2010 2010 7 2 32 72 95 83.5 51.5 1431
7/3/2010 2010 7 3 33 79 97 88 56 1487
7/4/2010 2010 7 4 34 55 84 69.5 37.5 1524.5
7/5/2010 2010 7 5 35 46 91 68.5 36.5 1561
7/6/2010 2010 7 6 36 54 97 75.5 43.5 1604.5
7/7/2010 2010 7 7 37 59 84 71.5 39.5 1644
7/8/2010 2010 7 8 38 61 95 78 46 1690
7/9/2010 2010 7 9 39 64 91 77.5 45.5 1735.5
7/10/2010 2010 7 10 40 70 88 79 47 1782.5
7/11/2010 2010 7 11 41 66 93 79.5 47.5 1830
7/12/2010 2010 7 12 42 61 100 80.5 48.5 1878.5
7/13/2010 2010 7 13 43 79 91 85 53 1931.5
7/14/2010 2010 7 14 44 64 93 78.5 46.5 1978
7/15/2010 2010 7 15 45 64 104 84 52 2030
7/16/2010 2010 7 16 46 55 108 81.5 49.5 2079.5
7/17/2010 2010 7 17 47 66 99 82.5 50.5 2130
7/18/2010 2010 7 18 48 73 106 89.5 57.5 2187.5
7/19/2010 2010 7 19 49 70 106 88 56 2243.5
7/20/2010 2010 7 20 50 72 99 85.5 53.5 2297
7/21/2010 2010 7 21 51 72 91 81.5 49.5 2346.5
7/22/2010 2010 7 22 52 66 93 79.5 47.5 2394
7/23/2010 2010 7 23 53 81 99 90 58 2452
7/24/2010 2010 7 24 54 64 102 83 51 2503
7/25/2010 2010 7 25 55 72 99 85.5 53.5 2556.5
7/26/2010 2010 7 26 56 75 97 86 54 2610.5
7/27/2010 2010 7 27 57 68 102 85 53 2663.5
7/28/2010 2010 7 28 58 68 90 79 47 2710.5
7/29/2010 2010 7 29 59 73 93 83 51 2761.5
7/30/2010 2010 7 30 60 75 100 87.5 55.5 2817
7/31/2010 2010 7 31 61 75 90 82.5 50.5 2867.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
8/1/2010 2010 8 1 62 73 84 78.5 46.5 2914
8/2/2010 2010 8 2 63 68 91 79.5 47.5 2961.5
8/3/2010 2010 8 3 64 70 90 80 48 3009.5
8/4/2010 2010 8 4 65 66 93 79.5 47.5 3057
8/5/2010 2010 8 5 66 68 88 78 46 3103
8/6/2010 2010 8 6 67 63 95 79 47 3150
8/7/2010 2010 8 7 68 61 75 68 36 3186
8/8/2010 2010 8 8 69 63 82 72.5 40.5 3226.5
8/9/2010 2010 8 9 70 61 90 75.5 43.5 3270
8/10/2010 2010 8 10 71 55 95 75 43 3313
8/11/2010 2010 8 11 72 63 91 77 45 3358
8/12/2010 2010 8 12 73 59 97 78 46 3404
8/13/2010 2010 8 13 74 63 97 80 48 3452
8/14/2010 2010 8 14 75 54 100 77 45 3497
8/15/2010 2010 8 15 76 61 100 80.5 48.5 3545.5
8/16/2010 2010 8 16 77 73 90 81.5 49.5 3595
8/17/2010 2010 8 17 78 66 100 83 51 3646
8/18/2010 2010 8 18 79 57 91 74 42 3688
8/19/2010 2010 8 19 80 64 72 68 36 3724
8/20/2010 2010 8 20 81 57 90 73.5 41.5 3765.5
8/21/2010 2010 8 21 82 57 97 77 45 3810.5
8/22/2010 2010 8 22 83 63 86 74.5 42.5 3853
8/23/2010 2010 8 23 84 72 95 83.5 51.5 3904.5
8/24/2010 2010 8 24 85 55 91 73 41 3945.5
8/25/2010 2010 8 25 86 55 97 76 44 3989.5
8/26/2010 2010 8 26 87 57 100 78.5 46.5 4036
8/27/2010 2010 8 27 88 59 88 73.5 41.5 4077.5
8/28/2010 2010 8 28 89 72 91 81.5 49.5 4127
8/29/2010 2010 8 29 90 73 86 79.5 47.5 4174.5
8/30/2010 2010 8 30 91 55 84 69.5 37.5 4212
8/31/2010 2010 8 31 92 52 90 71 39 4251
9/1/2010 2010 9 1 93 50 90 70 38 4289
9/2/2010 2010 9 2 94 52 88 70 38 4327
9/3/2010 2010 9 3 95 54 97 75.5 43.5 4370.5
9/4/2010 2010 9 4 96 54 100 77 45 4415.5
9/5/2010 2010 9 5 97 64 97 80.5 48.5 4464
9/6/2010 2010 9 6 98 55 82 68.5 36.5 4500.5
9/7/2010 2010 9 7 99 45 79 62 30 4530.5
9/8/2010 2010 9 8 100 55 82 68.5 36.5 4567
9/9/2010 2010 9 9 101 68 81 74.5 42.5 4609.5
9/10/2010 2010 9 10 102 55 77 66 34 4643.5
9/11/2010 2010 9 11 103 41 82 61.5 29.5 4673
9/12/2010 2010 9 12 104 46 90 68 36 4709
9/13/2010 2010 9 13 105 50 90 70 38 4747
9/14/2010 2010 9 14 106 81 93 87 55 4802
9/15/2010 2010 9 15 107 54 88 71 39 4841
9/16/2010 2010 9 16 108 54 99 76.5 44.5 4885.5
9/17/2010 2010 9 17 109 52 93 72.5 40.5 4926
9/18/2010 2010 9 18 110 48 95 71.5 39.5 4965.5
9/19/2010 2010 9 19 111 46 95 70.5 38.5 5004
9/20/2010 2010 9 20 112 50 93 71.5 39.5 5043.5
9/21/2010 2010 9 21 113 48 90 69 37 5080.5
9/22/2010 2010 9 22 114 57 81 69 37 5117.5
9/23/2010 2010 9 23 115 48 66 57 25 5142.5
9/24/2010 2010 9 24 116 46 88 67 35 5177.5
9/25/2010 2010 9 25 117 45 84 64.5 32.5 5210
9/26/2010 2010 9 26 118 36 90 63 31 5241
9/27/2010 2010 9 27 119 46 91 68.5 36.5 5277.5
9/28/2010 2010 9 28 120 48 95 71.5 39.5 5317
9/29/2010 2010 9 29 121 45 91 68 36 5353
9/30/2010 2010 9 30 122 45 88 66.5 34.5 5387.5
10/1/2010 2010 10 1 123 48 93 70.5 38.5 5426
10/2/2010 2010 10 2 124 46 91 68.5 36.5 5462.5
10/3/2010 2010 10 3 125 52 82 67 35 5497.5
10/4/2010 2010 10 4 126 54 72 63 31 5528.5
10/5/2010 2010 10 5 127 45 64 54.5 22.5 5551
10/6/2010 2010 10 6 128 52 57 54.5 22.5 5573.5
10/7/2010 2010 10 7 129 55 73 64 32 5605.5
10/8/2010 2010 10 8 130 46 75 60.5 28.5 5634
10/9/2010 2010 10 9 131 45 73 59 27 5661
10/10/2010 2010 10 10 132 43 72 57.5 25.5 5686.5
10/11/2010 2010 10 11 133 45 79 62 30 5716.5
10/12/2010 2010 10 12 134 46 81 63.5 31.5 5748
10/13/2010 2010 10 13 135 46 79 62.5 30.5 5778.5
10/14/2010 2010 10 14 136 39 59 49 17 5795.5
10/15/2010 2010 10 15 137 50 50 50 18 5813.5
10/16/2010 2010 10 16 138 45 86 65.5 33.5 5847
10/17/2010 2010 10 17 139 50 77 63.5 31.5 5878.5
10/18/2010 2010 10 18 140 52 61 56.5 24.5 5903
10/19/2010 2010 10 19 141 48 72 60 28 5931
10/20/2010 2010 10 20 142 57 75 66 34 5965
10/21/2010 2010 10 21 143 48 70 59 27 5992
10/22/2010 2010 10 22 144 50 57 53.5 21.5 6013.5
10/23/2010 2010 10 23 145 43 64 53.5 21.5 6035
10/24/2010 2010 10 24 146 45 64 54.5 22.5 6057.5
10/25/2010 2010 10 25 147 37 59 48 16 6073.5
10/26/2010 2010 10 26 148 28 57 42.5 10.5 6084
10/27/2010 2010 10 27 149 34 52 43 11 6095
10/28/2010 2010 10 28 150 21 61 41 9 6104
10/29/2010 2010 10 29 151 32 57 44.5 12.5 6116.5
10/30/2010 2010 10 30 152 30 64 47 15 6131.5
10/31/2010 2010 10 31 153 30 61 45.5 13.5 6145
11/1/2010 2010 11 1 154 32 64 48 16 6161
11/2/2010 2010 11 2 155 34 43 38.5 6.5 6167.5
11/3/2010 2010 11 3 156 34 81 57.5 25.5 6193
11/4/2010 2010 11 4 157 36 73 54.5 22.5 6215.5
11/5/2010 2010 11 5 158 36 72 54 22 6237.5
11/6/2010 2010 11 6 159 34 64 49 17 6254.5
11/7/2010 2010 11 7 160 36 70 53 21 6275.5
11/8/2010 2010 11 8 161 50 59 54.5 22.5 6298
11/9/2010 2010 11 9 162 32 52 42 10 6308
11/10/2010 2010 11 10 163 21 37 29 -3 6305
11/11/2010 2010 11 11 164 27 46 36.5 4.5 6309.5
11/12/2010 2010 11 12 165 30 52 41 9 6318.5
11/13/2010 2010 11 13 166 25 50 37.5 5.5 6324
11/14/2010 2010 11 14 167 25 52 38.5 6.5 6330.5
11/15/2010 2010 11 15 168 32 54 43 11 6341.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
11/16/2010 2010 11 16 169 30 57 43.5 11.5 6353
11/17/2010 2010 11 17 170 27 52 39.5 7.5 6360.5
11/18/2010 2010 11 18 171 23 52 37.5 5.5 6366
11/19/2010 2010 11 19 172 27 50 38.5 6.5 6372.5
11/20/2010 2010 11 20 173 50 59 54.5 22.5 6395
11/21/2010 2010 11 21 174 37 50 43.5 11.5 6406.5
11/22/2010 2010 11 22 175 28 48 38 6 6412.5
11/23/2010 2010 11 23 176 23 48 35.5 3.5 6416
11/24/2010 2010 11 24 177 16 37 26.5 -5.5 6410.5
11/25/2010 2010 11 25 178 9 36 22.5 -9.5 6401
11/26/2010 2010 11 26 179 10 39 24.5 -7.5 6393.5
11/27/2010 2010 11 27 180 12 37 24.5 -7.5 6386
11/28/2010 2010 11 28 181 19 46 32.5 0.5 6386.5
11/29/2010 2010 11 29 182 27 43 35 3 6389.5
11/30/2010 2010 11 30 183 10 41 25.5 -6.5 6383
12/1/2010 2010 12 1 184 19 45 32 0 6383
12/2/2010 2010 12 2 185 16 39 27.5 -4.5 6378.5
12/3/2010 2010 12 3 186 25 45 35 3 6381.5
12/4/2010 2010 12 4 187 30 52 41 9 6390.5
12/5/2010 2010 12 5 188 28 55 41.5 9.5 6400
12/6/2010 2010 12 6 189 23 48 35.5 3.5 6403.5
12/7/2010 2010 12 7 190 19 54 36.5 4.5 6408
12/8/2010 2010 12 8 191 19 45 32 0 6408
12/9/2010 2010 12 9 192 25 45 35 3 6411
12/10/2010 2010 12 10 193 25 54 39.5 7.5 6418.5
12/11/2010 2010 12 11 194 23 57 40 8 6426.5
12/12/2010 2010 12 12 195 27 52 39.5 7.5 6434
12/13/2010 2010 12 13 196 21 54 37.5 5.5 6439.5
12/14/2010 2010 12 14 197 21 46 33.5 1.5 6441
12/15/2010 2010 12 15 198 27 54 40.5 8.5 6449.5
12/16/2010 2010 12 16 199 23 43 33 1 6450.5
12/17/2010 2010 12 17 200 14 39 26.5 -5.5 6445
12/18/2010 2010 12 18 201 30 39 34.5 2.5 6447.5
12/19/2010 2010 12 19 202 43 57 50 18 6465.5
12/20/2010 2010 12 20 203 52 55 53.5 21.5 6487
12/21/2010 2010 12 21 204 50 57 53.5 21.5 6508.5
12/22/2010 2010 12 22 205 48 54 51 19 6527.5
12/23/2010 2010 12 23 206 43 54 48.5 16.5 6544
12/24/2010 2010 12 24 207 30 48 39 7 6551
12/25/2010 2010 12 25 208 25 48 36.5 4.5 6555.5
12/26/2010 2010 12 26 209 30 45 37.5 5.5 6561
12/27/2010 2010 12 27 210 25 39 32 0 6561
12/28/2010 2010 12 28 211 27 43 35 3 6564
12/29/2010 2010 12 29 212 37 45 41 9 6573
12/30/2010 2010 12 30 213 19 27 23 -9 6564
12/31/2010 2010 12 31 214 9 27 18 -14 6550
1/1/2011 2011 1 1 215 1 23 12 -20 6530
1/2/2011 2011 1 2 216 -4 19 7.5 -24.5 6505.5
1/3/2011 2011 1 3 217 3 21 12 -20 6485.5
1/4/2011 2011 1 4 218 9 30 19.5 -12.5 6473
1/5/2011 2011 1 5 219 1 30 15.5 -16.5 6456.5
1/6/2011 2011 1 6 220 3 34 18.5 -13.5 6443
1/7/2011 2011 1 7 221 7 36 21.5 -10.5 6432.5
1/8/2011 2011 1 8 222 7 37 22 -10 6422.5
1/9/2011 2011 1 9 223 14 36 25 -7 6415.5
1/10/2011 2011 1 10 224 10 36 23 -9 6406.5
1/11/2011 2011 1 11 225 -2 21 9.5 -22.5 6384
1/12/2011 2011 1 12 226 12 32 22 -10 6374
1/13/2011 2011 1 13 227 5 34 19.5 -12.5 6361.5
1/14/2011 2011 1 14 228 12 39 25.5 -6.5 6355
1/15/2011 2011 1 15 229 12 27 19.5 -12.5 6342.5
1/16/2011 2011 1 16 230 18 46 32 0 6342.5
1/17/2011 2011 1 17 231 21 61 41 9 6351.5
1/18/2011 2011 1 18 232 27 54 40.5 8.5 6360
1/19/2011 2011 1 19 233 23 48 35.5 3.5 6363.5
1/20/2011 2011 1 20 234 16 43 29.5 -2.5 6361
1/21/2011 2011 1 21 235 19 48 33.5 1.5 6362.5
1/22/2011 2011 1 22 236 21 52 36.5 4.5 6367
1/23/2011 2011 1 23 237 16 45 30.5 -1.5 6365.5
1/24/2011 2011 1 24 238 18 48 33 1 6366.5
1/25/2011 2011 1 25 239 21 43 32 0 6366.5
1/26/2011 2011 1 26 240 25 52 38.5 6.5 6373
1/27/2011 2011 1 27 241 25 48 36.5 4.5 6377.5
1/28/2011 2011 1 28 242 19 54 36.5 4.5 6382
1/29/2011 2011 1 29 243 18 54 36 4 6386
1/30/2011 2011 1 30 244 21 52 36.5 4.5 6390.5
1/31/2011 2011 1 31 245 21 43 32 0 6390.5
2/1/2011 2011 2 1 246 1 27 14 -18 6372.5
2/2/2011 2011 2 2 247 -6 18 6 -26 6346.5
2/3/2011 2011 2 3 248 -2 34 16 -16 6330.5
2/4/2011 2011 2 4 249 10 45 27.5 -4.5 6326
2/5/2011 2011 2 5 250 23 54 38.5 6.5 6332.5
2/6/2011 2011 2 6 251 19 45 32 0 6332.5
2/7/2011 2011 2 7 252 25 52 38.5 6.5 6339
2/8/2011 2011 2 8 253 25 41 33 1 6340
2/9/2011 2011 2 9 254 7 34 20.5 -11.5 6328.5
2/10/2011 2011 2 10 255 7 39 23 -9 6319.5
2/11/2011 2011 2 11 256 10 34 22 -10 6309.5
2/12/2011 2011 2 12 257 10 48 29 -3 6306.5
2/13/2011 2011 2 13 258 16 48 32 0 6306.5
2/14/2011 2011 2 14 259 19 52 35.5 3.5 6310
2/15/2011 2011 2 15 260 12 50 31 -1 6309
2/16/2011 2011 2 16 261 23 55 39 7 6316
2/17/2011 2011 2 17 262 30 55 42.5 10.5 6326.5
2/18/2011 2011 2 18 263 30 55 42.5 10.5 6337
2/19/2011 2011 2 19 264 34 52 43 11 6348
2/20/2011 2011 2 20 265 32 46 39 7 6355
2/21/2011 2011 2 21 266 21 46 33.5 1.5 6356.5
2/22/2011 2011 2 22 267 21 52 36.5 4.5 6361
2/23/2011 2011 2 23 268 23 50 36.5 4.5 6365.5
2/24/2011 2011 2 24 269 27 52 39.5 7.5 6373
2/25/2011 2011 2 25 270 43 50 46.5 14.5 6387.5
2/26/2011 2011 2 26 271 39 48 43.5 11.5 6399
2/27/2011 2011 2 27 272 28 52 40 8 6407
2/28/2011 2011 2 28 273 23 54 38.5 6.5 6413.5
3/1/2011 2011 3 1 274 21 55 38 6 6419.5
3/2/2011 2011 3 2 275 27 61 44 12 6431.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
3/3/2011 2011 3 3 276 30 61 45.5 13.5 6445
3/4/2011 2011 3 4 277 32 57 44.5 12.5 6457.5
3/5/2011 2011 3 5 278 19 64 41.5 9.5 6467
3/6/2011 2011 3 6 279 30 55 42.5 10.5 6477.5
3/7/2011 2011 3 7 280 32 45 38.5 6.5 6484
3/8/2011 2011 3 8 281 32 54 43 11 6495
3/9/2011 2011 3 9 282 23 59 41 9 6504
3/10/2011 2011 3 10 283 27 64 45.5 13.5 6517.5
3/11/2011 2011 3 11 284 30 73 51.5 19.5 6537
3/12/2011 2011 3 12 285 37 70 53.5 21.5 6558.5
3/13/2011 2011 3 13 286 37 66 51.5 19.5 6578
3/14/2011 2011 3 14 287 36 72 54 22 6600
3/15/2011 2011 3 15 288 41 70 55.5 23.5 6623.5
3/16/2011 2011 3 16 289 39 72 55.5 23.5 6647
3/17/2011 2011 3 17 290 43 50 46.5 14.5 6661.5
3/18/2011 2011 3 18 291 37 66 51.5 19.5 6681
3/19/2011 2011 3 19 292 43 63 53 21 6702
3/20/2011 2011 3 20 293 46 64 55 23 6725
3/21/2011 2011 3 21 294 45 55 50 18 6743
3/22/2011 2011 3 22 295 36 55 45.5 13.5 6756.5
3/23/2011 2011 3 23 296 28 63 45.5 13.5 6770
3/24/2011 2011 3 24 297 28 57 42.5 10.5 6780.5
3/25/2011 2011 3 25 298 45 66 55.5 23.5 6804
3/26/2011 2011 3 26 299 30 50 40 8 6812
3/27/2011 2011 3 27 300 36 61 48.5 16.5 6828.5
3/28/2011 2011 3 28 301 36 63 49.5 17.5 6846
3/29/2011 2011 3 29 302 28 57 42.5 10.5 6856.5
3/30/2011 2011 3 30 303 46 64 55 23 6879.5
3/31/2011 2011 3 31 304 45 75 60 28 6907.5
4/1/2011 2011 4 1 305 41 66 53.5 21.5 6929
4/2/2011 2011 4 2 306 37 84 60.5 28.5 6957.5
4/3/2011 2011 4 3 307 37 64 50.5 18.5 6976
4/4/2011 2011 4 4 308 27 57 42 10 6986
4/5/2011 2011 4 5 309 32 75 53.5 21.5 7007.5
4/6/2011 2011 4 6 310 50 70 60 28 7035.5
4/7/2011 2011 4 7 311 43 66 54.5 22.5 7058
4/8/2011 2011 4 8 312 45 57 51 19 7077
4/9/2011 2011 4 9 313 36 52 44 12 7089
4/10/2011 2011 4 10 314 34 57 45.5 13.5 7102.5
4/11/2011 2011 4 11 315 28 64 46 14 7116.5
4/12/2011 2011 4 12 316 36 73 54.5 22.5 7139
4/13/2011 2011 4 13 317 39 73 56 24 7163
4/14/2011 2011 4 14 318 45 61 53 21 7184
4/15/2011 2011 4 15 319 30 68 49 17 7201
4/16/2011 2011 4 16 320 34 79 56.5 24.5 7225.5
4/17/2011 2011 4 17 321 46 82 64 32 7257.5
4/18/2011 2011 4 18 322 52 75 63.5 31.5 7289
4/19/2011 2011 4 19 323 41 66 53.5 21.5 7310.5
4/20/2011 2011 4 20 324 66 75 70.5 38.5 7349
4/21/2011 2011 4 21 325 48 77 62.5 30.5 7379.5
4/22/2011 2011 4 22 326 43 70 56.5 24.5 7404
4/23/2011 2011 4 23 327 46 64 55 23 7427
4/24/2011 2011 4 24 328 46 63 54.5 22.5 7449.5
4/25/2011 2011 4 25 329 41 64 52.5 20.5 7470
4/26/2011 2011 4 26 330 39 52 45.5 13.5 7483.5
4/27/2011 2011 4 27 331 36 64 50 18 7501.5
4/28/2011 2011 4 28 332 36 75 55.5 23.5 7525
4/29/2011 2011 4 29 333 37 61 49 17 7542
4/30/2011 2011 4 30 334 36 55 45.5 13.5 7555.5
5/1/2011 2011 5 1 335 32 57 44.5 12.5 7568
5/2/2011 2011 5 2 336 30 64 47 15 7583
5/3/2011 2011 5 3 337 36 79 57.5 25.5 7608.5
5/4/2011 2011 5 4 338 46 73 59.5 27.5 7636
5/5/2011 2011 5 5 339 37 81 59 27 7663
5/6/2011 2011 5 6 340 45 84 64.5 32.5 7695.5
5/7/2011 2011 5 7 341 46 86 66 34 7729.5
5/8/2011 2011 5 8 342 48 82 65 33 7762.5
5/9/2011 2011 5 9 343 48 61 54.5 22.5 7785
5/10/2011 2011 5 10 344 46 52 49 17 7802
5/11/2011 2011 5 11 345 39 64 51.5 19.5 7821.5
5/12/2011 2011 5 12 346 43 77 60 28 7849.5
5/13/2011 2011 5 13 347 45 81 63 31 7880.5
5/14/2011 2011 5 14 348 46 79 62.5 30.5 7911
5/15/2011 2011 5 15 349 48 84 66 34 7945
5/16/2011 2011 5 16 350 57 75 66 34 7979
5/17/2011 2011 5 17 351 54 70 62 30 8009
5/18/2011 2011 5 18 352 46 57 51.5 19.5 8028.5
5/19/2011 2011 5 19 353 45 55 50 18 8046.5
5/20/2011 2011 5 20 354 45 66 55.5 23.5 8070
5/21/2011 2011 5 21 355 46 79 62.5 30.5 8100.5
5/22/2011 2011 5 22 356 55 81 68 36 8136.5
5/23/2011 2011 5 23 357 54 68 61 29 8165.5
5/24/2011 2011 5 24 358 54 68 61 29 8194.5
5/25/2011 2011 5 25 359 45 75 60 28 8222.5
5/26/2011 2011 5 26 360 52 84 68 36 8258.5
5/27/2011 2011 5 27 361 50 84 67 35 8293.5
5/28/2011 2011 5 28 362 55 88 71.5 39.5 8333
5/29/2011 2011 5 29 363 57 75 66 34 8367
5/30/2011 2011 5 30 364 54 73 63.5 31.5 8398.5
5/31/2011 2011 5 31 365 41 82 61.5 29.5 8428
6/1/2011 2011 6 1 1 48 88 68 36 36
6/2/2011 2011 6 2 2 72 79 75.5 43.5 79.5
6/3/2011 2011 6 3 3 54 82 68 36 115.5
6/4/2011 2011 6 4 4 45 93 69 37 152.5
6/5/2011 2011 6 5 5 48 88 68 36 188.5
6/6/2011 2011 6 6 6 63 91 77 45 233.5
6/7/2011 2011 6 7 7 50 88 69 37 270.5
6/8/2011 2011 6 8 8 50 88 69 37 307.5
6/9/2011 2011 6 9 9 63 88 75.5 43.5 351
6/10/2011 2011 6 10 10 52 88 70 38 389
6/11/2011 2011 6 11 11 63 91 77 45 434
6/12/2011 2011 6 12 12 63 90 76.5 44.5 478.5
6/13/2011 2011 6 13 13 55 90 72.5 40.5 519
6/14/2011 2011 6 14 14 57 91 74 42 561
6/15/2011 2011 6 15 15 54 93 73.5 41.5 602.5
6/16/2011 2011 6 16 16 63 88 75.5 43.5 646
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
6/17/2011 2011 6 17 17 63 81 72 40 686
6/18/2011 2011 6 18 18 64 90 77 45 731
6/19/2011 2011 6 19 19 61 75 68 36 767
6/20/2011 2011 6 20 20 61 84 72.5 40.5 807.5
6/21/2011 2011 6 21 21 45 91 68 36 843.5
6/22/2011 2011 6 22 22 55 99 77 45 888.5
6/23/2011 2011 6 23 23 55 100 77.5 45.5 934
6/24/2011 2011 6 24 24 72 100 86 54 988
6/25/2011 2011 6 25 25 64 97 80.5 48.5 1036.5
6/26/2011 2011 6 26 26 73 100 86.5 54.5 1091
6/27/2011 2011 6 27 27 61 100 80.5 48.5 1139.5
6/28/2011 2011 6 28 28 61 102 81.5 49.5 1189
6/29/2011 2011 6 29 29 79 97 88 56 1245
6/30/2011 2011 6 30 30 66 81 73.5 41.5 1286.5
7/1/2011 2011 7 1 31 57 97 77 45 1331.5
7/2/2011 2011 7 2 32 79 102 90.5 58.5 1390
7/3/2011 2011 7 3 33 66 106 86 54 1444
7/4/2011 2011 7 4 34 79 99 89 57 1501
7/5/2011 2011 7 5 35 70 86 78 46 1547
7/6/2011 2011 7 6 36 68 93 80.5 48.5 1595.5
7/7/2011 2011 7 7 37 75 99 87 55 1650.5
7/8/2011 2011 7 8 38 73 82 77.5 45.5 1696
7/9/2011 2011 7 9 39 63 86 74.5 42.5 1738.5
7/10/2011 2011 7 10 40 66 84 75 43 1781.5
7/11/2011 2011 7 11 41 68 91 79.5 47.5 1829
7/12/2011 2011 7 12 42 64 84 74 42 1871
7/13/2011 2011 7 13 43 66 93 79.5 47.5 1918.5
7/14/2011 2011 7 14 44 68 95 81.5 49.5 1968
7/15/2011 2011 7 15 45 55 95 75 43 2011
7/16/2011 2011 7 16 46 55 97 76 44 2055
7/17/2011 2011 7 17 47 79 99 89 57 2112
7/18/2011 2011 7 18 48 75 97 86 54 2166
7/19/2011 2011 7 19 49 73 95 84 52 2218
7/20/2011 2011 7 20 50 64 100 82 50 2268
7/21/2011 2011 7 21 51 63 102 82.5 50.5 2318.5
7/22/2011 2011 7 22 52 63 100 81.5 49.5 2368
7/23/2011 2011 7 23 53 61 100 80.5 48.5 2416.5
7/24/2011 2011 7 24 54 61 104 82.5 50.5 2467
7/25/2011 2011 7 25 55 66 100 83 51 2518
7/26/2011 2011 7 26 56 70 79 74.5 42.5 2560.5
7/27/2011 2011 7 27 57 66 86 76 44 2604.5
7/28/2011 2011 7 28 58 63 90 76.5 44.5 2649
7/29/2011 2011 7 29 59 63 97 80 48 2697
7/30/2011 2011 7 30 60 68 95 81.5 49.5 2746.5
7/31/2011 2011 7 31 61 68 97 82.5 50.5 2797
8/1/2011 2011 8 1 62 68 88 78 46 2843
8/2/2011 2011 8 2 63 73 99 86 54 2897
8/3/2011 2011 8 3 64 70 99 84.5 52.5 2949.5
8/4/2011 2011 8 4 65 66 93 79.5 47.5 2997
8/5/2011 2011 8 5 66 63 99 81 49 3046
8/6/2011 2011 8 6 67 63 99 81 49 3095
8/7/2011 2011 8 7 68 73 100 86.5 54.5 3149.5
8/8/2011 2011 8 8 69 57 99 78 46 3195.5
8/9/2011 2011 8 9 70 57 104 80.5 48.5 3244
8/10/2011 2011 8 10 71 59 102 80.5 48.5 3292.5
8/11/2011 2011 8 11 72 72 100 86 54 3346.5
8/12/2011 2011 8 12 73 61 102 81.5 49.5 3396
8/13/2011 2011 8 13 74 63 104 83.5 51.5 3447.5
8/14/2011 2011 8 14 75 70 88 79 47 3494.5
8/15/2011 2011 8 15 76 63 91 77 45 3539.5
8/16/2011 2011 8 16 77 63 100 81.5 49.5 3589
8/17/2011 2011 8 17 78 64 102 83 51 3640
8/18/2011 2011 8 18 79 64 97 80.5 48.5 3688.5
8/19/2011 2011 8 19 80 64 90 77 45 3733.5
8/20/2011 2011 8 20 81 70 91 80.5 48.5 3782
8/21/2011 2011 8 21 82 63 91 77 45 3827
8/22/2011 2011 8 22 83 63 91 77 45 3872
8/23/2011 2011 8 23 84 63 100 81.5 49.5 3921.5
8/24/2011 2011 8 24 85 63 100 81.5 49.5 3971
8/25/2011 2011 8 25 86 75 99 87 55 4026
8/26/2011 2011 8 26 87 66 97 81.5 49.5 4075.5
8/27/2011 2011 8 27 88 70 88 79 47 4122.5
8/28/2011 2011 8 28 89 72 95 83.5 51.5 4174
8/29/2011 2011 8 29 90 64 84 74 42 4216
8/30/2011 2011 8 30 91 64 88 76 44 4260
8/31/2011 2011 8 31 92 81 97 89 57 4317
9/1/2011 2011 9 1 93 73 97 85 53 4370
9/2/2011 2011 9 2 94 63 93 78 46 4416
9/3/2011 2011 9 3 95 55 95 75 43 4459
9/4/2011 2011 9 4 96 55 97 76 44 4503
9/5/2011 2011 9 5 97 77 90 83.5 51.5 4554.5
9/6/2011 2011 9 6 98 64 84 74 42 4596.5
9/7/2011 2011 9 7 99 54 88 71 39 4635.5
9/8/2011 2011 9 8 100 54 90 72 40 4675.5
9/9/2011 2011 9 9 101 61 81 71 39 4714.5
9/10/2011 2011 9 10 102 59 79 69 37 4751.5
9/11/2011 2011 9 11 103 57 81 69 37 4788.5
9/12/2011 2011 9 12 104 63 84 73.5 41.5 4830
9/13/2011 2011 9 13 105 54 86 70 38 4868
9/14/2011 2011 9 14 106 57 70 63.5 31.5 4899.5
9/15/2011 2011 9 15 107 55 75 65 33 4932.5
9/16/2011 2011 9 16 108 50 81 65.5 33.5 4966
9/17/2011 2011 9 17 109 55 72 63.5 31.5 4997.5
9/18/2011 2011 9 18 110 52 84 68 36 5033.5
9/19/2011 2011 9 19 111 63 88 75.5 43.5 5077
9/20/2011 2011 9 20 112 55 90 72.5 40.5 5117.5
9/21/2011 2011 9 21 113 52 90 71 39 5156.5
9/22/2011 2011 9 22 114 52 88 70 38 5194.5
9/23/2011 2011 9 23 115 46 88 67 35 5229.5
9/24/2011 2011 9 24 116 45 88 66.5 34.5 5264
9/25/2011 2011 9 25 117 46 86 66 34 5298
9/26/2011 2011 9 26 118 52 84 68 36 5334
9/27/2011 2011 9 27 119 48 86 67 35 5369
9/28/2011 2011 9 28 120 48 91 69.5 37.5 5406.5
9/29/2011 2011 9 29 121 50 91 70.5 38.5 5445
9/30/2011 2011 9 30 122 52 88 70 38 5483
10/1/2011 2011 10 1 123 57 90 73.5 41.5 5524.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
10/2/2011 2011 10 2 124 55 81 68 36 5560.5
10/3/2011 2011 10 3 125 50 81 65.5 33.5 5594
10/4/2011 2011 10 4 126 61 77 69 37 5631
10/5/2011 2011 10 5 127 54 64 59 27 5658
10/6/2011 2011 10 6 128 39 54 46.5 14.5 5672.5
10/7/2011 2011 10 7 129 32 57 44.5 12.5 5685
10/8/2011 2011 10 8 130 45 57 51 19 5704
10/9/2011 2011 10 9 131 34 63 48.5 16.5 5720.5
10/10/2011 2011 10 10 132 34 66 50 18 5738.5
10/11/2011 2011 10 11 133 43 75 59 27 5765.5
10/12/2011 2011 10 12 134 41 75 58 26 5791.5
10/13/2011 2011 10 13 135 37 77 57 25 5816.5
10/14/2011 2011 10 14 136 36 82 59 27 5843.5
10/15/2011 2011 10 15 137 45 86 65.5 33.5 5877
10/16/2011 2011 10 16 138 45 82 63.5 31.5 5908.5
10/17/2011 2011 10 17 139 52 75 63.5 31.5 5940
10/18/2011 2011 10 18 140 36 70 53 21 5961
10/19/2011 2011 10 19 141 45 54 49.5 17.5 5978.5
10/20/2011 2011 10 20 142 36 36 36 4 5982.5
10/21/2011 2011 10 21 143 36 77 56.5 24.5 6007
10/22/2011 2011 10 22 144 37 75 56 24 6031
10/23/2011 2011 10 23 145 36 79 57.5 25.5 6056.5
10/24/2011 2011 10 24 146 34 73 53.5 21.5 6078
10/25/2011 2011 10 25 147 52 73 62.5 30.5 6108.5
10/26/2011 2011 10 26 148 39 50 44.5 12.5 6121
10/27/2011 2011 10 27 149 28 54 41 9 6130
10/28/2011 2011 10 28 150 27 57 42 10 6140
10/29/2011 2011 10 29 151 27 55 41 9 6149
10/30/2011 2011 10 30 152 30 64 47 15 6164
10/31/2011 2011 10 31 153 28 63 45.5 13.5 6177.5
11/1/2011 2011 11 1 154 30 55 42.5 10.5 6188
11/2/2011 2011 11 2 155 28 52 40 8 6196
11/3/2011 2011 11 3 156 23 54 38.5 6.5 6202.5
11/4/2011 2011 11 4 157 25 61 43 11 6213.5
11/5/2011 2011 11 5 158 37 45 41 9 6222.5
11/6/2011 2011 11 6 159 27 50 38.5 6.5 6229
11/7/2011 2011 11 7 160 36 39 37.5 5.5 6234.5
11/8/2011 2011 11 8 161 32 32 32 0 6234.5
11/9/2011 2011 11 9 162 23 48 35.5 3.5 6238
11/10/2011 2011 11 10 163 23 46 34.5 2.5 6240.5
11/11/2011 2011 11 11 164 27 43 35 3 6243.5
11/12/2011 2011 11 12 165 28 57 42.5 10.5 6254
11/13/2011 2011 11 13 166 37 57 47 15 6269
11/14/2011 2011 11 14 167 30 61 45.5 13.5 6282.5
11/15/2011 2011 11 15 168 28 61 44.5 12.5 6295
11/16/2011 2011 11 16 169 27 54 40.5 8.5 6303.5
11/17/2011 2011 11 17 170 21 54 37.5 5.5 6309
11/18/2011 2011 11 18 171 21 61 41 9 6318
11/19/2011 2011 11 19 172 39 54 46.5 14.5 6332.5
11/20/2011 2011 11 20 173 37 61 49 17 6349.5
11/21/2011 2011 11 21 174 37 61 49 17 6366.5
11/22/2011 2011 11 22 175 28 57 42.5 10.5 6377
11/23/2011 2011 11 23 176 25 57 41 9 6386
11/24/2011 2011 11 24 177 39 52 45.5 13.5 6399.5
11/25/2011 2011 11 25 178 39 55 47 15 6414.5
11/26/2011 2011 11 26 179 21 46 33.5 1.5 6416
11/27/2011 2011 11 27 180 18 48 33 1 6417
11/28/2011 2011 11 28 181 18 45 31.5 -0.5 6416.5
11/29/2011 2011 11 29 182 21 54 37.5 5.5 6422
11/30/2011 2011 11 30 183 18 46 32 0 6422
12/1/2011 2011 12 1 184 37 45 41 9 6431
12/2/2011 2011 12 2 185 32 45 38.5 6.5 6437.5
12/3/2011 2011 12 3 186 30 48 39 7 6444.5
12/4/2011 2011 12 4 187 14 36 25 -7 6437.5
12/5/2011 2011 12 5 188 10 34 22 -10 6427.5
12/6/2011 2011 12 6 189 5 34 19.5 -12.5 6415
12/7/2011 2011 12 7 190 7 39 23 -9 6406
12/8/2011 2011 12 8 191 25 45 35 3 6409
12/9/2011 2011 12 9 192 9 43 26 -6 6403
12/10/2011 2011 12 10 193 9 39 24 -8 6395
12/11/2011 2011 12 11 194 12 43 27.5 -4.5 6390.5
12/12/2011 2011 12 12 195 16 37 26.5 -5.5 6385
12/13/2011 2011 12 13 196 30 37 33.5 1.5 6386.5
12/14/2011 2011 12 14 197 28 36 32 0 6386.5
12/15/2011 2011 12 15 198 27 34 30.5 -1.5 6385
12/16/2011 2011 12 16 199 25 41 33 1 6386
12/17/2011 2011 12 17 200 16 45 30.5 -1.5 6384.5
12/18/2011 2011 12 18 201 16 45 30.5 -1.5 6383
12/19/2011 2011 12 19 202 28 34 31 -1 6382
12/20/2011 2011 12 20 203 19 27 23 -9 6373
12/21/2011 2011 12 21 204 16 45 30.5 -1.5 6371.5
12/22/2011 2011 12 22 205 18 34 26 -6 6365.5
12/23/2011 2011 12 23 206 5 34 19.5 -12.5 6353
12/24/2011 2011 12 24 207 10 39 24.5 -7.5 6345.5
12/25/2011 2011 12 25 208 9 45 27 -5 6340.5
12/26/2011 2011 12 26 209 10 45 27.5 -4.5 6336
12/27/2011 2011 12 27 210 9 39 24 -8 6328
12/28/2011 2011 12 28 211 12 43 27.5 -4.5 6323.5
12/29/2011 2011 12 29 212 18 45 31.5 -0.5 6323
12/30/2011 2011 12 30 213 19 46 32.5 0.5 6323.5
12/31/2011 2011 12 31 214 19 48 33.5 1.5 6325
1/1/2012 2012 1 1 215 10 46 28 -4 6321
1/2/2012 2012 1 2 216 12 48 30 -2 6319
1/3/2012 2012 1 3 217 16 45 30.5 -1.5 6317.5
1/4/2012 2012 1 4 218 10 48 29 -3 6314.5
1/5/2012 2012 1 5 219 14 48 31 -1 6313.5
1/6/2012 2012 1 6 220 16 50 33 1 6314.5
1/7/2012 2012 1 7 221 16 46 31 -1 6313.5
1/8/2012 2012 1 8 222 16 50 33 1 6314.5
1/9/2012 2012 1 9 223 16 45 30.5 -1.5 6313
1/10/2012 2012 1 10 224 10 50 30 -2 6311
1/11/2012 2012 1 11 225 16 46 31 -1 6310
1/12/2012 2012 1 12 226 16 45 30.5 -1.5 6308.5
1/13/2012 2012 1 13 227 3 39 21 -11 6297.5
1/14/2012 2012 1 14 228 7 45 26 -6 6291.5
1/15/2012 2012 1 15 229 10 45 27.5 -4.5 6287
1/16/2012 2012 1 16 230 19 48 33.5 1.5 6288.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
1/17/2012 2012 1 17 231 3 37 20 -12 6276.5
1/18/2012 2012 1 18 232 10 52 31 -1 6275.5
1/19/2012 2012 1 19 233 16 46 31 -1 6274.5
1/20/2012 2012 1 20 234 21 57 39 7 6281.5
1/21/2012 2012 1 21 235 39 48 43.5 11.5 6293
1/22/2012 2012 1 22 236 30 45 37.5 5.5 6298.5
1/23/2012 2012 1 23 237 27 43 35 3 6301.5
1/24/2012 2012 1 24 238 25 45 35 3 6304.5
1/25/2012 2012 1 25 239 16 48 32 0 6304.5
1/26/2012 2012 1 26 240 19 48 33.5 1.5 6306
1/27/2012 2012 1 27 241 27 50 38.5 6.5 6312.5
1/28/2012 2012 1 28 242 10 46 28 -4 6308.5
1/29/2012 2012 1 29 243 12 45 28.5 -3.5 6305
1/30/2012 2012 1 30 244 12 34 23 -9 6296
1/31/2012 2012 1 31 245 16 48 32 0 6296
2/1/2012 2012 2 1 246 12 46 29 -3 6293
2/2/2012 2012 2 2 247 34 43 38.5 6.5 6299.5
2/3/2012 2012 2 3 248 25 46 35.5 3.5 6303
2/4/2012 2012 2 4 249 16 45 30.5 -1.5 6301.5
2/5/2012 2012 2 5 250 23 45 34 2 6303.5
2/6/2012 2012 2 6 251 18 46 32 0 6303.5
2/7/2012 2012 2 7 252 12 46 29 -3 6300.5
2/8/2012 2012 2 8 253 27 46 36.5 4.5 6305
2/9/2012 2012 2 9 254 18 52 35 3 6308
2/10/2012 2012 2 10 255 25 55 40 8 6316
2/11/2012 2012 2 11 256 37 48 42.5 10.5 6326.5
2/12/2012 2012 2 12 257 34 54 44 12 6338.5
2/13/2012 2012 2 13 258 28 48 38 6 6344.5
2/14/2012 2012 2 14 259 36 54 45 13 6357.5
2/15/2012 2012 2 15 260 32 45 38.5 6.5 6364
2/16/2012 2012 2 16 261 23 52 37.5 5.5 6369.5
2/17/2012 2012 2 17 262 19 52 35.5 3.5 6373
2/18/2012 2012 2 18 263 19 52 35.5 3.5 6376.5
2/19/2012 2012 2 19 264 30 43 36.5 4.5 6381
2/20/2012 2012 2 20 265 21 46 33.5 1.5 6382.5
2/21/2012 2012 2 21 266 21 55 38 6 6388.5
2/22/2012 2012 2 22 267 30 63 46.5 14.5 6403
2/23/2012 2012 2 23 268 28 52 40 8 6411
2/24/2012 2012 2 24 269 18 55 36.5 4.5 6415.5
2/25/2012 2012 2 25 270 18 63 40.5 8.5 6424
2/26/2012 2012 2 26 271 25 45 35 3 6427
2/27/2012 2012 2 27 272 43 52 47.5 15.5 6442.5
2/28/2012 2012 2 28 273 36 57 46.5 14.5 6457
2/29/2012 2012 2 29 274 27 55 41 9 6466
3/1/2012 2012 3 1 275 36 46 41 9 6475
3/2/2012 2012 3 2 276 28 43 35.5 3.5 6478.5
3/3/2012 2012 3 3 277 18 57 37.5 5.5 6484
3/4/2012 2012 3 4 278 21 59 40 8 6492
3/5/2012 2012 3 5 279 19 64 41.5 9.5 6501.5
3/6/2012 2012 3 6 280 34 73 53.5 21.5 6523
3/7/2012 2012 3 7 281 37 48 42.5 10.5 6533.5
3/8/2012 2012 3 8 282 28 61 44.5 12.5 6546
3/9/2012 2012 3 9 283 18 66 42 10 6556
3/10/2012 2012 3 10 284 19 66 42.5 10.5 6566.5
3/11/2012 2012 3 11 285 30 73 51.5 19.5 6586
3/12/2012 2012 3 12 286 52 66 59 27 6613
3/13/2012 2012 3 13 287 54 72 63 31 6644
3/14/2012 2012 3 14 288 43 73 58 26 6670
3/15/2012 2012 3 15 289 41 79 60 28 6698
3/16/2012 2012 3 16 290 39 75 57 25 6723
3/17/2012 2012 3 17 291 61 72 66.5 34.5 6757.5
3/18/2012 2012 3 18 292 37 54 45.5 13.5 6771
3/19/2012 2012 3 19 293 30 50 40 8 6779
3/20/2012 2012 3 20 294 19 39 29 -3 6776
3/21/2012 2012 3 21 295 28 66 47 15 6791
3/22/2012 2012 3 22 296 28 75 51.5 19.5 6810.5
3/23/2012 2012 3 23 297 34 77 55.5 23.5 6834
3/24/2012 2012 3 24 298 37 72 54.5 22.5 6856.5
3/25/2012 2012 3 25 299 36 73 54.5 22.5 6879
3/26/2012 2012 3 26 300 46 64 55 23 6902
3/27/2012 2012 3 27 301 32 73 52.5 20.5 6922.5
3/28/2012 2012 3 28 302 37 73 55 23 6945.5
3/29/2012 2012 3 29 303 46 73 59.5 27.5 6973
3/30/2012 2012 3 30 304 41 81 61 29 7002
3/31/2012 2012 3 31 305 43 86 64.5 32.5 7034.5
4/1/2012 2012 4 1 306 46 72 59 27 7061.5
4/2/2012 2012 4 2 307 39 57 48 16 7077.5
4/3/2012 2012 4 3 308 37 72 54.5 22.5 7100
4/4/2012 2012 4 4 309 37 75 56 24 7124
4/5/2012 2012 4 5 310 57 72 64.5 32.5 7156.5
4/6/2012 2012 4 6 311 39 57 48 16 7172.5
4/7/2012 2012 4 7 312 30 64 47 15 7187.5
4/8/2012 2012 4 8 313 27 75 51 19 7206.5
4/9/2012 2012 4 9 314 34 82 58 26 7232.5
4/10/2012 2012 4 10 315 41 84 62.5 30.5 7263
4/11/2012 2012 4 11 316 48 79 63.5 31.5 7294.5
4/12/2012 2012 4 12 317 48 61 54.5 22.5 7317
4/13/2012 2012 4 13 318 48 59 53.5 21.5 7338.5
4/14/2012 2012 4 14 319 39 54 46.5 14.5 7353
4/15/2012 2012 4 15 320 48 63 55.5 23.5 7376.5
4/16/2012 2012 4 16 321 37 72 54.5 22.5 7399
4/17/2012 2012 4 17 322 46 70 58 26 7425
4/18/2012 2012 4 18 323 39 77 58 26 7451
4/19/2012 2012 4 19 324 54 73 63.5 31.5 7482.5
4/20/2012 2012 4 20 325 48 82 65 33 7515.5
4/21/2012 2012 4 21 326 54 88 71 39 7554.5
4/22/2012 2012 4 22 327 43 79 61 29 7583.5
4/23/2012 2012 4 23 328 57 95 76 44 7627.5
4/24/2012 2012 4 24 329 46 91 68.5 36.5 7664
4/25/2012 2012 4 25 330 68 82 75 43 7707
4/26/2012 2012 4 26 331 61 75 68 36 7743
4/27/2012 2012 4 27 332 52 63 57.5 25.5 7768.5
4/28/2012 2012 4 28 333 48 70 59 27 7795.5
4/29/2012 2012 4 29 334 39 75 57 25 7820.5
4/30/2012 2012 4 30 335 41 84 62.5 30.5 7851
5/1/2012 2012 5 1 336 68 79 73.5 41.5 7892.5
5/2/2012 2012 5 2 337 66 79 72.5 40.5 7933
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
5/3/2012 2012 5 3 338 55 81 68 36 7969
5/4/2012 2012 5 4 339 66 84 75 43 8012
5/5/2012 2012 5 5 340 55 75 65 33 8045
5/6/2012 2012 5 6 341 39 75 57 25 8070
5/7/2012 2012 5 7 342 59 72 65.5 33.5 8103.5
5/8/2012 2012 5 8 343 43 82 62.5 30.5 8134
5/9/2012 2012 5 9 344 39 88 63.5 31.5 8165.5
5/10/2012 2012 5 10 345 48 88 68 36 8201.5
5/11/2012 2012 5 11 346 55 79 67 35 8236.5
5/12/2012 2012 5 12 347 55 84 69.5 37.5 8274
5/13/2012 2012 5 13 348 48 82 65 33 8307
5/14/2012 2012 5 14 349 54 90 72 40 8347
5/15/2012 2012 5 15 350 43 90 66.5 34.5 8381.5
5/16/2012 2012 5 16 351 64 82 73 41 8422.5
5/17/2012 2012 5 17 352 46 88 67 35 8457.5
5/18/2012 2012 5 18 353 61 81 71 39 8496.5
5/19/2012 2012 5 19 354 59 81 70 38 8534.5
5/20/2012 2012 5 20 355 34 88 61 29 8563.5
5/21/2012 2012 5 21 356 46 95 70.5 38.5 8602
5/22/2012 2012 5 22 357 57 97 77 45 8647
5/23/2012 2012 5 23 358 61 82 71.5 39.5 8686.5
5/24/2012 2012 5 24 359 46 75 60.5 28.5 8715
5/25/2012 2012 5 25 360 70 81 75.5 43.5 8758.5
5/26/2012 2012 5 26 361 61 75 68 36 8794.5
5/27/2012 2012 5 27 362 50 75 62.5 30.5 8825
5/28/2012 2012 5 28 363 41 77 59 27 8852
5/29/2012 2012 5 29 364 45 88 66.5 34.5 8886.5
5/30/2012 2012 5 30 365 52 86 69 37 8923.5
5/31/2012 2012 5 31 366 72 93 82.5 50.5 8974
6/1/2012 2012 6 1 1 57 99 78 46 46
6/2/2012 2012 6 2 2 64 93 78.5 46.5 92.5
6/3/2012 2012 6 3 3 57 102 79.5 47.5 140
6/4/2012 2012 6 4 4 61 97 79 47 187
6/5/2012 2012 6 5 5 72 93 82.5 50.5 237.5
6/6/2012 2012 6 6 6 50 82 66 34 271.5
6/7/2012 2012 6 7 7 54 88 71 39 310.5
6/8/2012 2012 6 8 8 52 99 75.5 43.5 354
6/9/2012 2012 6 9 9 81 95 88 56 410
6/10/2012 2012 6 10 10 55 79 67 35 445
6/11/2012 2012 6 11 11 48 84 66 34 479
6/12/2012 2012 6 12 12 50 95 72.5 40.5 519.5
6/13/2012 2012 6 13 13 54 99 76.5 44.5 564
6/14/2012 2012 6 14 14 57 100 78.5 46.5 610.5
6/15/2012 2012 6 15 15 72 97 84.5 52.5 663
6/16/2012 2012 6 16 16 59 99 79 47 710
6/17/2012 2012 6 17 17 61 100 80.5 48.5 758.5
6/18/2012 2012 6 18 18 64 102 83 51 809.5
6/19/2012 2012 6 19 19 64 99 81.5 49.5 859
6/20/2012 2012 6 20 20 63 97 80 48 907
6/21/2012 2012 6 21 21 54 104 79 47 954
6/22/2012 2012 6 22 22 82 102 92 60 1014
6/23/2012 2012 6 23 23 77 102 89.5 57.5 1071.5
6/24/2012 2012 6 24 24 73 106 89.5 57.5 1129
6/25/2012 2012 6 25 25 73 99 86 54 1183
6/26/2012 2012 6 26 26 84 100 92 60 1243
6/27/2012 2012 6 27 27 81 102 91.5 59.5 1302.5
6/28/2012 2012 6 28 28 70 102 86 54 1356.5
6/29/2012 2012 6 29 29 66 104 85 53 1409.5
6/30/2012 2012 6 30 30 64 106 85 53 1462.5
7/1/2012 2012 7 1 31 61 102 81.5 49.5 1512
7/2/2012 2012 7 2 32 72 90 81 49 1561
7/3/2012 2012 7 3 33 61 100 80.5 48.5 1609.5
7/4/2012 2012 7 4 34 72 97 84.5 52.5 1662
7/5/2012 2012 7 5 35 66 84 75 43 1705
7/6/2012 2012 7 6 36 66 91 78.5 46.5 1751.5
7/7/2012 2012 7 7 37 66 99 82.5 50.5 1802
7/8/2012 2012 7 8 38 72 95 83.5 51.5 1853.5
7/9/2012 2012 7 9 39 77 99 88 56 1909.5
7/10/2012 2012 7 10 40 70 102 86 54 1963.5
7/11/2012 2012 7 11 41 66 106 86 54 2017.5
7/12/2012 2012 7 12 42 72 106 89 57 2074.5
7/13/2012 2012 7 13 43 73 100 86.5 54.5 2129
7/14/2012 2012 7 14 44 66 79 72.5 40.5 2169.5
7/15/2012 2012 7 15 45 70 91 80.5 48.5 2218
7/16/2012 2012 7 16 46 64 88 76 44 2262
7/17/2012 2012 7 17 47 59 102 80.5 48.5 2310.5
7/18/2012 2012 7 18 48 63 100 81.5 49.5 2360
7/19/2012 2012 7 19 49 64 97 80.5 48.5 2408.5
7/20/2012 2012 7 20 50 68 99 83.5 51.5 2460
7/21/2012 2012 7 21 51 75 100 87.5 55.5 2515.5
7/22/2012 2012 7 22 52 68 93 80.5 48.5 2564
7/23/2012 2012 7 23 53 72 90 81 49 2613
7/24/2012 2012 7 24 54 73 84 78.5 46.5 2659.5
7/25/2012 2012 7 25 55 72 100 86 54 2713.5
7/26/2012 2012 7 26 56 81 102 91.5 59.5 2773
7/27/2012 2012 7 27 57 72 97 84.5 52.5 2825.5
7/28/2012 2012 7 28 58 66 93 79.5 47.5 2873
7/29/2012 2012 7 29 59 70 84 77 45 2918
7/30/2012 2012 7 30 60 70 93 81.5 49.5 2967.5
7/31/2012 2012 7 31 61 66 90 78 46 3013.5
8/1/2012 2012 8 1 62 68 82 75 43 3056.5
8/2/2012 2012 8 2 63 75 90 82.5 50.5 3107
8/3/2012 2012 8 3 64 72 97 84.5 52.5 3159.5
8/4/2012 2012 8 4 65 66 100 83 51 3210.5
8/5/2012 2012 8 5 66 61 97 79 47 3257.5
8/6/2012 2012 8 6 67 77 95 86 54 3311.5
8/7/2012 2012 8 7 68 70 102 86 54 3365.5
8/8/2012 2012 8 8 69 64 104 84 52 3417.5
8/9/2012 2012 8 9 70 68 99 83.5 51.5 3469
8/10/2012 2012 8 10 71 70 97 83.5 51.5 3520.5
8/11/2012 2012 8 11 72 70 97 83.5 51.5 3572
8/12/2012 2012 8 12 73 66 97 81.5 49.5 3621.5
8/13/2012 2012 8 13 74 73 90 81.5 49.5 3671
8/14/2012 2012 8 14 75 68 91 79.5 47.5 3718.5
8/15/2012 2012 8 15 76 64 90 77 45 3763.5
8/16/2012 2012 8 16 77 64 95 79.5 47.5 3811
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
8/17/2012 2012 8 17 78 70 102 86 54 3865
8/18/2012 2012 8 18 79 70 102 86 54 3919
8/19/2012 2012 8 19 80 81 102 91.5 59.5 3978.5
8/20/2012 2012 8 20 81 75 97 86 54 4032.5
8/21/2012 2012 8 21 82 66 79 72.5 40.5 4073
8/22/2012 2012 8 22 83 73 88 80.5 48.5 4121.5
8/23/2012 2012 8 23 84 64 75 69.5 37.5 4159
8/24/2012 2012 8 24 85 64 90 77 45 4204
8/25/2012 2012 8 25 86 63 82 72.5 40.5 4244.5
8/26/2012 2012 8 26 87 64 97 80.5 48.5 4293
8/27/2012 2012 8 27 88 72 99 85.5 53.5 4346.5
8/28/2012 2012 8 28 89 66 93 79.5 47.5 4394
8/29/2012 2012 8 29 90 70 100 85 53 4447
8/30/2012 2012 8 30 91 81 97 89 57 4504
8/31/2012 2012 8 31 92 70 95 82.5 50.5 4554.5
9/1/2012 2012 9 1 93 66 95 80.5 48.5 4603
9/2/2012 2012 9 2 94 64 82 73 41 4644
9/3/2012 2012 9 3 95 61 93 77 45 4689
9/4/2012 2012 9 4 96 57 99 78 46 4735
9/5/2012 2012 9 5 97 61 97 79 47 4782
9/6/2012 2012 9 6 98 61 91 76 44 4826
9/7/2012 2012 9 7 99 68 91 79.5 47.5 4873.5
9/8/2012 2012 9 8 100 57 91 74 42 4915.5
9/9/2012 2012 9 9 101 52 91 71.5 39.5 4955
9/10/2012 2012 9 10 102 59 93 76 44 4999
9/11/2012 2012 9 11 103 64 72 68 36 5035
9/12/2012 2012 9 12 104 63 84 73.5 41.5 5076.5
9/13/2012 2012 9 13 105 52 84 68 36 5112.5
9/14/2012 2012 9 14 106 48 88 68 36 5148.5
9/15/2012 2012 9 15 107 50 91 70.5 38.5 5187
9/16/2012 2012 9 16 108 50 91 70.5 38.5 5225.5
9/17/2012 2012 9 17 109 55 88 71.5 39.5 5265
9/18/2012 2012 9 18 110 48 86 67 35 5300
9/19/2012 2012 9 19 111 63 90 76.5 44.5 5344.5
9/20/2012 2012 9 20 112 48 81 64.5 32.5 5377
9/21/2012 2012 9 21 113 48 91 69.5 37.5 5414.5
9/22/2012 2012 9 22 114 46 91 68.5 36.5 5451
9/23/2012 2012 9 23 115 57 84 70.5 38.5 5489.5
9/24/2012 2012 9 24 116 61 75 68 36 5525.5
9/25/2012 2012 9 25 117 55 75 65 33 5558.5
9/26/2012 2012 9 26 118 50 72 61 29 5587.5
9/27/2012 2012 9 27 119 48 81 64.5 32.5 5620
9/28/2012 2012 9 28 120 48 81 64.5 32.5 5652.5
9/29/2012 2012 9 29 121 48 86 67 35 5687.5
9/30/2012 2012 9 30 122 48 88 68 36 5723.5
10/1/2012 2012 10 1 123 45 79 62 30 5753.5
10/2/2012 2012 10 2 124 48 80 64 32 5785.5
10/3/2012 2012 10 3 125 50 84 67 35 5820.5
10/4/2012 2012 10 4 126 42 79 60.5 28.5 5849
10/5/2012 2012 10 5 127 48 74 61 29 5878
10/6/2012 2012 10 6 128 44 62 53 21 5899
10/7/2012 2012 10 7 129 32 62 47 15 5914
10/8/2012 2012 10 8 130 34 65 49.5 17.5 5931.5
10/9/2012 2012 10 9 131 38 72 55 23 5954.5
10/10/2012 2012 10 10 132 48 74 61 29 5983.5
10/11/2012 2012 10 11 133 49 76 62.5 30.5 6014
10/12/2012 2012 10 12 134 45 63 54 22 6036
10/13/2012 2012 10 13 135 44 56 50 18 6054
10/14/2012 2012 10 14 136 42 65 53.5 21.5 6075.5
10/15/2012 2012 10 15 137 41 67 54 22 6097.5
10/16/2012 2012 10 16 138 42 70 56 24 6121.5
10/17/2012 2012 10 17 139 37 61 49 17 6138.5
10/18/2012 2012 10 18 140 30 63 46.5 14.5 6153
10/19/2012 2012 10 19 141 37 67 52 20 6173
10/20/2012 2012 10 20 142 39 71 55 23 6196
10/21/2012 2012 10 21 143 42 72 57 25 6221
10/22/2012 2012 10 22 144 51 70 60.5 28.5 6249.5
10/23/2012 2012 10 23 145 55 72 63.5 31.5 6281
10/24/2012 2012 10 24 146 35 61 48 16 6297
10/25/2012 2012 10 25 147 28 49 38.5 6.5 6303.5
10/26/2012 2012 10 26 148 25 46 35.5 3.5 6307
10/27/2012 2012 10 27 149 24 52 38 6 6313
10/28/2012 2012 10 28 150 27 60 43.5 11.5 6324.5
10/29/2012 2012 10 29 151 34 64 49 17 6341.5
10/30/2012 2012 10 30 152 36 66 51 19 6360.5
10/31/2012 2012 10 31 153 36 68 52 20 6380.5
11/1/2012 2012 11 1 154 39 67 53 21 6401.5
11/2/2012 2012 11 2 155 38 64 51 19 6420.5
11/3/2012 2012 11 3 156 34 63 48.5 16.5 6437
11/4/2012 2012 11 4 157 31 63 47 15 6452
11/5/2012 2012 11 5 158 35 63 49 17 6469
11/6/2012 2012 11 6 159 36 67 51.5 19.5 6488.5
11/7/2012 2012 11 7 160 34 65 49.5 17.5 6506
11/8/2012 2012 11 8 161 40 67 53.5 21.5 6527.5
11/9/2012 2012 11 9 162 46 61 53.5 21.5 6549
11/10/2012 2012 11 10 163 27 45 36 4 6553
11/11/2012 2012 11 11 164 15 36 25.5 -6.5 6546.5
11/12/2012 2012 11 12 165 18 38 28 -4 6542.5
11/13/2012 2012 11 13 166 19 45 32 0 6542.5
11/14/2012 2012 11 14 167 22 49 35.5 3.5 6546
11/15/2012 2012 11 15 168 25 54 39.5 7.5 6553.5
11/16/2012 2012 11 16 169 30 47 38.5 6.5 6560
11/17/2012 2012 11 17 170 38 52 45 13 6573
11/18/2012 2012 11 18 171 41 56 48.5 16.5 6589.5
11/19/2012 2012 11 19 172 37 57 47 15 6604.5
11/20/2012 2012 11 20 173 30 57 43.5 11.5 6616
11/21/2012 2012 11 21 174 26 56 41 9 6625
11/22/2012 2012 11 22 175 27 58 42.5 10.5 6635.5
11/23/2012 2012 11 23 176 30 57 43.5 11.5 6647
11/24/2012 2012 11 24 177 24 54 39 7 6654
11/25/2012 2012 11 25 178 21 53 37 5 6659
11/26/2012 2012 11 26 179 25 52 38.5 6.5 6665.5
11/27/2012 2012 11 27 180 19 51 35 3 6668.5
11/28/2012 2012 11 28 181 23 51 37 5 6673.5
11/29/2012 2012 11 29 182 28 55 41.5 9.5 6683
11/30/2012 2012 11 30 183 36 57 46.5 14.5 6697.5
12/1/2012 2012 12 1 184 37 58 47.5 15.5 6713
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
12/2/2012 2012 12 2 185 36 55 45.5 13.5 6726.5
12/3/2012 2012 12 3 186 27 51 39 7 6733.5
12/4/2012 2012 12 4 187 26 50 38 6 6739.5
12/5/2012 2012 12 5 188 25 48 36.5 4.5 6744
12/6/2012 2012 12 6 189 30 52 41 9 6753
12/7/2012 2012 12 7 190 30 51 40.5 8.5 6761.5
12/8/2012 2012 12 8 191 22 53 37.5 5.5 6767
12/9/2012 2012 12 9 192 15 31 23 -9 6758
12/10/2012 2012 12 10 193 15 27 21 -11 6747
12/11/2012 2012 12 11 194 11 37 24 -8 6739
12/12/2012 2012 12 12 195 25 42 33.5 1.5 6740.5
12/13/2012 2012 12 13 196 27 56 41.5 9.5 6750
12/14/2012 2012 12 14 197 33 42 37.5 5.5 6755.5
12/15/2012 2012 12 15 198 32 39 35.5 3.5 6759
12/16/2012 2012 12 16 199 29 41 35 3 6762
12/17/2012 2012 12 17 200 29 41 35 3 6765
12/18/2012 2012 12 18 201 26 43 34.5 2.5 6767.5
12/19/2012 2012 12 19 202 1 25 13 -19 6748.5
12/20/2012 2012 12 20 203 -1 18 8.5 -23.5 6725
12/21/2012 2012 12 21 204 -3 16 6.5 -25.5 6699.5
12/22/2012 2012 12 22 205 -5 15 5 -27 6672.5
12/23/2012 2012 12 23 206 3 21 12 -20 6652.5
12/24/2012 2012 12 24 207 18 29 23.5 -8.5 6644
12/25/2012 2012 12 25 208 9 25 17 -15 6629
12/26/2012 2012 12 26 209 13 24 18.5 -13.5 6615.5
12/27/2012 2012 12 27 210 12 27 19.5 -12.5 6603
12/28/2012 2012 12 28 211 3 19 11 -21 6582
12/29/2012 2012 12 29 212 -2 19 8.5 -23.5 6558.5
12/30/2012 2012 12 30 213 -1 19 9 -23 6535.5
12/31/2012 2012 12 31 214 6 21 13.5 -18.5 6517
1/1/2013 2013 1 1 215 2 19 10.5 -21.5 6495.5
1/2/2013 2013 1 2 216 -3 19 8 -24 6471.5
1/3/2013 2013 1 3 217 -6 20 7 -25 6446.5
1/4/2013 2013 1 4 218 -4 14 5 -27 6419.5
1/5/2013 2013 1 5 219 -6 20 7 -25 6394.5
1/6/2013 2013 1 6 220 -8 13 2.5 -29.5 6365
1/7/2013 2013 1 7 221 -5 15 5 -27 6338
1/8/2013 2013 1 8 222 0 22 11 -21 6317
1/9/2013 2013 1 9 223 6 25 15.5 -16.5 6300.5
1/10/2013 2013 1 10 224 5 41 23 -9 6291.5
1/11/2013 2013 1 11 225 4 37 20.5 -11.5 6280
1/12/2013 2013 1 12 226 -6 16 5 -27 6253
1/13/2013 2013 1 13 227 -5 12 3.5 -28.5 6224.5
1/14/2013 2013 1 14 228 -11 10 -0.5 -32.5 6192
1/15/2013 2013 1 15 229 -11 14 1.5 -30.5 6161.5
1/16/2013 2013 1 16 230 -3 20 8.5 -23.5 6138
1/17/2013 2013 1 17 231 1 20 10.5 -21.5 6116.5
1/18/2013 2013 1 18 232 0 18 9 -23 6093.5
1/19/2013 2013 1 19 233 -2 26 12 -20 6073.5
1/20/2013 2013 1 20 234 -1 23 11 -21 6052.5
1/21/2013 2013 1 21 235 0 29 14.5 -17.5 6035
1/22/2013 2013 1 22 236 -1 26 12.5 -19.5 6015.5
1/23/2013 2013 1 23 237 3 24 13.5 -18.5 5997
1/24/2013 2013 1 24 238 13 30 21.5 -10.5 5986.5
1/25/2013 2013 1 25 239 27 31 29 -3 5983.5
1/26/2013 2013 1 26 240 30 36 33 1 5984.5
1/27/2013 2013 1 27 241 30 41 35.5 3.5 5988
1/28/2013 2013 1 28 242 25 39 32 0 5988
1/29/2013 2013 1 29 243 19 28 23.5 -8.5 5979.5
1/30/2013 2013 1 30 244 18 32 25 -7 5972.5
1/31/2013 2013 1 31 245 18 37 27.5 -4.5 5968
2/1/2013 2013 2 1 246 22 39 30.5 -1.5 5966.5
2/2/2013 2013 2 2 247 23 44 33.5 1.5 5968
2/3/2013 2013 2 3 248 27 36 31.5 -0.5 5967.5
2/4/2013 2013 2 4 249 22 40 31 -1 5966.5
2/5/2013 2013 2 5 250 25 45 35 3 5969.5
2/6/2013 2013 2 6 251 26 44 35 3 5972.5
2/7/2013 2013 2 7 252 26 47 36.5 4.5 5977
2/8/2013 2013 2 8 253 30 54 42 10 5987
2/9/2013 2013 2 9 254 28 38 33 1 5988
2/10/2013 2013 2 10 255 22 37 29.5 -2.5 5985.5
2/11/2013 2013 2 11 256 19 30 24.5 -7.5 5978
2/12/2013 2013 2 12 257 14 33 23.5 -8.5 5969.5
2/13/2013 2013 2 13 258 20 36 28 -4 5965.5
2/14/2013 2013 2 14 259 24 43 33.5 1.5 5967
2/15/2013 2013 2 15 260 22 45 33.5 1.5 5968.5
2/16/2013 2013 2 16 261 23 45 34 2 5970.5
2/17/2013 2013 2 17 262 24 48 36 4 5974.5
2/18/2013 2013 2 18 263 21 40 30.5 -1.5 5973
2/19/2013 2013 2 19 264 20 48 34 2 5975
2/20/2013 2013 2 20 265 30 47 38.5 6.5 5981.5
2/21/2013 2013 2 21 266 32 41 36.5 4.5 5986
2/22/2013 2013 2 22 267 22 35 28.5 -3.5 5982.5
2/23/2013 2013 2 23 268 20 41 30.5 -1.5 5981
2/24/2013 2013 2 24 269 19 32 25.5 -6.5 5974.5
2/25/2013 2013 2 25 270 17 39 28 -4 5970.5
2/26/2013 2013 2 26 271 24 36 30 -2 5968.5
2/27/2013 2013 2 27 272 18 38 28 -4 5964.5
2/28/2013 2013 2 28 273 17 42 29.5 -2.5 5962
3/1/2013 2013 3 1 274 27 50 38.5 6.5 5968.5
3/2/2013 2013 3 2 275 25 55 40 8 5976.5
3/3/2013 2013 3 3 276 32 53 42.5 10.5 5987
3/4/2013 2013 3 4 277 27 51 39 7 5994
3/5/2013 2013 3 5 278 20 49 34.5 2.5 5996.5
3/6/2013 2013 3 6 279 27 60 43.5 11.5 6008
3/7/2013 2013 3 7 280 32 65 48.5 16.5 6024.5
3/8/2013 2013 3 8 281 36 53 44.5 12.5 6037
3/9/2013 2013 3 9 282 32 40 36 4 6041
3/10/2013 2013 3 10 283 28 47 37.5 5.5 6046.5
3/11/2013 2013 3 11 284 30 51 40.5 8.5 6055
3/12/2013 2013 3 12 285 34 56 45 13 6068
3/13/2013 2013 3 13 286 30 63 46.5 14.5 6082.5
3/14/2013 2013 3 14 287 34 67 50.5 18.5 6101
3/15/2013 2013 3 15 288 40 67 53.5 21.5 6122.5
3/16/2013 2013 3 16 289 43 63 53 21 6143.5
3/17/2013 2013 3 17 290 36 60 48 16 6159.5
3/18/2013 2013 3 18 291 32 55 43.5 11.5 6171
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
3/19/2013 2013 3 19 292 34 55 44.5 12.5 6183.5
3/20/2013 2013 3 20 293 31 56 43.5 11.5 6195
3/21/2013 2013 3 21 294 30 52 41 9 6204
3/22/2013 2013 3 22 295 26 52 39 7 6211
3/23/2013 2013 3 23 296 21 37 29 -3 6208
3/24/2013 2013 3 24 297 14 39 26.5 -5.5 6202.5
3/25/2013 2013 3 25 298 20 45 32.5 0.5 6203
3/26/2013 2013 3 26 299 30 61 45.5 13.5 6216.5
3/27/2013 2013 3 27 300 33 65 49 17 6233.5
3/28/2013 2013 3 28 301 41 68 54.5 22.5 6256
3/29/2013 2013 3 29 302 42 69 55.5 23.5 6279.5
3/30/2013 2013 3 30 303 36 68 52 20 6299.5
3/31/2013 2013 3 31 304 40 70 55 23 6322.5
4/1/2013 2013 4 1 305 42 66 54 22 6344.5
4/2/2013 2013 4 2 306 36 58 47 15 6359.5
4/3/2013 2013 4 3 307 37 66 51.5 19.5 6379
4/4/2013 2013 4 4 308 39 69 54 22 6401
4/5/2013 2013 4 5 309 48 69 58.5 26.5 6427.5
4/6/2013 2013 4 6 310 39 65 52 20 6447.5
4/7/2013 2013 4 7 311 43 69 56 24 6471.5
4/8/2013 2013 4 8 312 42 64 53 21 6492.5
4/9/2013 2013 4 9 313 21 42 31.5 -0.5 6492
4/10/2013 2013 4 10 314 22 47 34.5 2.5 6494.5
4/11/2013 2013 4 11 315 33 55 44 12 6506.5
4/12/2013 2013 4 12 316 38 63 50.5 18.5 6525
4/13/2013 2013 4 13 317 38 69 53.5 21.5 6546.5
4/14/2013 2013 4 14 318 34 56 45 13 6559.5
4/15/2013 2013 4 15 319 37 44 40.5 8.5 6568
4/16/2013 2013 4 16 320 30 50 40 8 6576
4/17/2013 2013 4 17 321 26 37 31.5 -0.5 6575.5
4/18/2013 2013 4 18 322 25 41 33 1 6576.5
4/19/2013 2013 4 19 323 25 52 38.5 6.5 6583
4/20/2013 2013 4 20 324 41 57 49 17 6600
4/21/2013 2013 4 21 325 33 64 48.5 16.5 6616.5
4/22/2013 2013 4 22 326 42 67 54.5 22.5 6639
4/23/2013 2013 4 23 327 37 51 44 12 6651
4/24/2013 2013 4 24 328 34 58 46 14 6665
4/25/2013 2013 4 25 329 36 68 52 20 6685
4/26/2013 2013 4 26 330 41 70 55.5 23.5 6708.5
4/27/2013 2013 4 27 331 37 74 55.5 23.5 6732
4/28/2013 2013 4 28 332 40 77 58.5 26.5 6758.5
4/29/2013 2013 4 29 333 49 79 64 32 6790.5
4/30/2013 2013 4 30 334 44 80 62 30 6820.5
5/1/2013 2013 5 1 335 37 57 47 15 6835.5
5/2/2013 2013 5 2 336 31 58 44.5 12.5 6848
5/3/2013 2013 5 3 337 32 69 50.5 18.5 6866.5
5/4/2013 2013 5 4 338 41 75 58 26 6892.5
5/5/2013 2013 5 5 339 56 76 66 34 6926.5
5/6/2013 2013 5 6 340 48 68 58 26 6952.5
5/7/2013 2013 5 7 341 45 63 54 22 6974.5
5/8/2013 2013 5 8 342 42 54 48 16 6990.5
5/9/2013 2013 5 9 343 46 66 56 24 7014.5
5/10/2013 2013 5 10 344 43 70 56.5 24.5 7039
5/11/2013 2013 5 11 345 45 76 60.5 28.5 7067.5
5/12/2013 2013 5 12 346 50 80 65 33 7100.5
5/13/2013 2013 5 13 347 54 85 69.5 37.5 7138
5/14/2013 2013 5 14 348 57 86 71.5 39.5 7177.5
5/15/2013 2013 5 15 349 60 82 71 39 7216.5
5/16/2013 2013 5 16 350 53 81 67 35 7251.5
5/17/2013 2013 5 17 351 60 80 70 38 7289.5
5/18/2013 2013 5 18 352 48 66 57 25 7314.5
5/19/2013 2013 5 19 353 41 70 55.5 23.5 7338
5/20/2013 2013 5 20 354 42 64 53 21 7359
5/21/2013 2013 5 21 355 45 74 59.5 27.5 7386.5
5/22/2013 2013 5 22 356 51 83 67 35 7421.5
5/23/2013 2013 5 23 357 61 86 73.5 41.5 7463
5/24/2013 2013 5 24 358 57 83 70 38 7501
5/25/2013 2013 5 25 359 54 84 69 37 7538
5/26/2013 2013 5 26 360 56 85 70.5 38.5 7576.5
5/27/2013 2013 5 27 361 54 82 68 36 7612.5
5/28/2013 2013 5 28 362 49 79 64 32 7644.5
5/29/2013 2013 5 29 363 46 70 58 26 7670.5
5/30/2013 2013 5 30 364 43 74 58.5 26.5 7697
5/31/2013 2013 5 31 365 51 75 63 31 7728
6/1/2013 2013 6 1 1 44 75 59.5 27.5 27.5
6/2/2013 2013 6 2 2 49 87 68 36 63.5
6/3/2013 2013 6 3 3 57 90 73.5 41.5 105
6/4/2013 2013 6 4 4 52 90 71 39 144
6/5/2013 2013 6 5 5 53 84 68.5 36.5 180.5
6/6/2013 2013 6 6 6 53 87 70 38 218.5
6/7/2013 2013 6 7 7 58 90 74 42 260.5
6/8/2013 2013 6 8 8 58 92 75 43 303.5
6/9/2013 2013 6 9 9 59 93 76 44 347.5
6/10/2013 2013 6 10 10 66 96 81 49 396.5
6/11/2013 2013 6 11 11 66 91 78.5 46.5 443
6/12/2013 2013 6 12 12 58 92 75 43 486
6/13/2013 2013 6 13 13 68 94 81 49 535
6/14/2013 2013 6 14 14 58 90 74 42 577
6/15/2013 2013 6 15 15 58 89 73.5 41.5 618.5
6/16/2013 2013 6 16 16 63 88 75.5 43.5 662
6/17/2013 2013 6 17 17 60 91 75.5 43.5 705.5
6/18/2013 2013 6 18 18 64 93 78.5 46.5 752
6/19/2013 2013 6 19 19 63 92 77.5 45.5 797.5
6/20/2013 2013 6 20 20 52 90 71 39 836.5
6/21/2013 2013 6 21 21 56 91 73.5 41.5 878
6/22/2013 2013 6 22 22 60 90 75 43 921
6/23/2013 2013 6 23 23 57 91 74 42 963
6/24/2013 2013 6 24 24 67 87 77 45 1008
6/25/2013 2013 6 25 25 60 88 74 42 1050
6/26/2013 2013 6 26 26 60 96 78 46 1096
6/27/2013 2013 6 27 27 64 101 82.5 50.5 1146.5
6/28/2013 2013 6 28 28 67 103 85 53 1199.5
6/29/2013 2013 6 29 29 72 100 86 54 1253.5
6/30/2013 2013 6 30 30 64 96 80 48 1301.5
7/1/2013 2013 7 1 31 69 97 83 51 1352.5
7/2/2013 2013 7 2 32 73 96 84.5 52.5 1405
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
7/3/2013 2013 7 3 33 66 95 80.5 48.5 1453.5
7/4/2013 2013 7 4 34 70 92 81 49 1502.5
7/5/2013 2013 7 5 35 70 95 82.5 50.5 1553
7/6/2013 2013 7 6 36 72 93 82.5 50.5 1603.5
7/7/2013 2013 7 7 37 63 93 78 46 1649.5
7/8/2013 2013 7 8 38 61 95 78 46 1695.5
7/9/2013 2013 7 9 39 67 97 82 50 1745.5
7/10/2013 2013 7 10 40 69 99 84 52 1797.5
7/11/2013 2013 7 11 41 65 97 81 49 1846.5
7/12/2013 2013 7 12 42 64 91 77.5 45.5 1892
7/13/2013 2013 7 13 43 66 91 78.5 46.5 1938.5
7/14/2013 2013 7 14 44 70 92 81 49 1987.5
7/15/2013 2013 7 15 45 70 96 83 51 2038.5
7/16/2013 2013 7 16 46 65 90 77.5 45.5 2084
7/17/2013 2013 7 17 47 64 90 77 45 2129
7/18/2013 2013 7 18 48 63 93 78 46 2175
7/19/2013 2013 7 19 49 63 93 78 46 2221
7/20/2013 2013 7 20 50 67 94 80.5 48.5 2269.5
7/21/2013 2013 7 21 51 65 98 81.5 49.5 2319
7/22/2013 2013 7 22 52 72 98 85 53 2372
7/23/2013 2013 7 23 53 63 98 80.5 48.5 2420.5
7/24/2013 2013 7 24 54 71 88 79.5 47.5 2468
7/25/2013 2013 7 25 55 64 93 78.5 46.5 2514.5
7/26/2013 2013 7 26 56 67 96 81.5 49.5 2564
7/27/2013 2013 7 27 57 63 90 76.5 44.5 2608.5
7/28/2013 2013 7 28 58 62 81 71.5 39.5 2648
7/29/2013 2013 7 29 59 59 80 69.5 37.5 2685.5
7/30/2013 2013 7 30 60 59 88 73.5 41.5 2727
7/31/2013 2013 7 31 61 66 93 79.5 47.5 2774.5
8/1/2013 2013 8 1 62 61 76 68.5 36.5 2811
8/2/2013 2013 8 2 63 61 87 74 42 2853
8/3/2013 2013 8 3 64 66 88 77 45 2898
8/4/2013 2013 8 4 65 63 86 74.5 42.5 2940.5
8/5/2013 2013 8 5 66 65 87 76 44 2984.5
8/6/2013 2013 8 6 67 63 88 75.5 43.5 3028
8/7/2013 2013 8 7 68 62 83 72.5 40.5 3068.5
8/8/2013 2013 8 8 69 61 85 73 41 3109.5
8/9/2013 2013 8 9 70 59 86 72.5 40.5 3150
8/10/2013 2013 8 10 71 56 81 68.5 36.5 3186.5
8/11/2013 2013 8 11 72 55 84 69.5 37.5 3224
8/12/2013 2013 8 12 73 57 84 70.5 38.5 3262.5
8/13/2013 2013 8 13 74 58 89 73.5 41.5 3304
8/14/2013 2013 8 14 75 59 91 75 43 3347
8/15/2013 2013 8 15 76 58 93 75.5 43.5 3390.5
8/16/2013 2013 8 16 77 59 95 77 45 3435.5
8/17/2013 2013 8 17 78 62 93 77.5 45.5 3481
8/18/2013 2013 8 18 79 63 93 78 46 3527
8/19/2013 2013 8 19 80 65 97 81 49 3576
8/20/2013 2013 8 20 81 69 87 78 46 3622
8/21/2013 2013 8 21 82 59 92 75.5 43.5 3665.5
8/22/2013 2013 8 22 83 68 87 77.5 45.5 3711
8/23/2013 2013 8 23 84 63 87 75 43 3754
8/24/2013 2013 8 24 85 60 84 72 40 3794
8/25/2013 2013 8 25 86 60 69 64.5 32.5 3826.5
8/26/2013 2013 8 26 87 61 78 69.5 37.5 3864
8/27/2013 2013 8 27 88 60 82 71 39 3903
8/28/2013 2013 8 28 89 59 89 74 42 3945
8/29/2013 2013 8 29 90 63 93 78 46 3991
8/30/2013 2013 8 30 91 67 93 80 48 4039
8/31/2013 2013 8 31 92 70 91 80.5 48.5 4087.5
9/1/2013 2013 9 1 93 67 89 78 46 4133.5
9/2/2013 2013 9 2 94 68 90 79 47 4180.5
9/3/2013 2013 9 3 95 63 91 77 45 4225.5
9/4/2013 2013 9 4 96 69 94 81.5 49.5 4275
9/5/2013 2013 9 5 97 72 92 82 50 4325
9/6/2013 2013 9 6 98 67 94 80.5 48.5 4373.5
9/7/2013 2013 9 7 99 69 93 81 49 4422.5
9/8/2013 2013 9 8 100 63 82 72.5 40.5 4463
9/9/2013 2013 9 9 101 55 63 59 27 4490
9/10/2013 2013 9 10 102 59 63 61 29 4519
9/11/2013 2013 9 11 103 61 73 67 35 4554
9/12/2013 2013 9 12 104 60 77 68.5 36.5 4590.5
9/13/2013 2013 9 13 105 54 78 66 34 4624.5
9/14/2013 2013 9 14 106 57 68 62.5 30.5 4655
9/15/2013 2013 9 15 107 55 75 65 33 4688
9/16/2013 2013 9 16 108 55 79 67 35 4723
9/17/2013 2013 9 17 109 57 74 65.5 33.5 4756.5
9/18/2013 2013 9 18 110 59 80 69.5 37.5 4794
9/19/2013 2013 9 19 111 50 74 62 30 4824
9/20/2013 2013 9 20 112 47 79 63 31 4855
9/21/2013 2013 9 21 113 59 83 71 39 4894
9/22/2013 2013 9 22 114 48 70 59 27 4921
9/23/2013 2013 9 23 115 46 66 56 24 4945
9/24/2013 2013 9 24 116 45 73 59 27 4972
9/25/2013 2013 9 25 117 55 79 67 35 5007
9/26/2013 2013 9 26 118 57 78 67.5 35.5 5042.5
9/27/2013 2013 9 27 119 40 60 50 18 5060.5
9/28/2013 2013 9 28 120 35 60 47.5 15.5 5076
9/29/2013 2013 9 29 121 36 69 52.5 20.5 5096.5
9/30/2013 2013 9 30 122 49 75 62 30 5126.5
10/1/2013 2013 10 1 123 47 76 61.5 29.5 5156
10/2/2013 2013 10 2 124 48 75 61.5 29.5 5185.5
10/3/2013 2013 10 3 125 31 72 51.5 19.5 5205
10/4/2013 2013 10 4 126 32 46 39 7 5212
10/5/2013 2013 10 5 127 34 52 43 11 5223
10/6/2013 2013 10 6 128 33 61 47 15 5238
10/7/2013 2013 10 7 129 38 66 52 20 5258
10/8/2013 2013 10 8 130 43 71 57 25 5283
10/9/2013 2013 10 9 131 52 68 60 28 5311
10/10/2013 2013 10 10 132 43 56 49.5 17.5 5328.5
10/11/2013 2013 10 11 133 43 58 50.5 18.5 5347
10/12/2013 2013 10 12 134 41 62 51.5 19.5 5366.5
10/13/2013 2013 10 13 135 42 71 56.5 24.5 5391
10/14/2013 2013 10 14 136 42 51 46.5 14.5 5405.5
10/15/2013 2013 10 15 137 36 51 43.5 11.5 5417
10/16/2013 2013 10 16 138 30 52 41 9 5426
10/17/2013 2013 10 17 139 30 56 43 11 5437
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
10/18/2013 2013 10 18 140 35 53 44 12 5449
10/19/2013 2013 10 19 141 31 57 44 12 5461
10/20/2013 2013 10 20 142 33 57 45 13 5474
10/21/2013 2013 10 21 143 32 61 46.5 14.5 5488.5
10/22/2013 2013 10 22 144 34 63 48.5 16.5 5505
10/23/2013 2013 10 23 145 35 65 50 18 5523
10/24/2013 2013 10 24 146 35 66 50.5 18.5 5541.5
10/25/2013 2013 10 25 147 40 64 52 20 5561.5
10/26/2013 2013 10 26 148 38 67 52.5 20.5 5582
10/27/2013 2013 10 27 149 37 64 50.5 18.5 5600.5
10/28/2013 2013 10 28 150 47 68 57.5 25.5 5626
10/29/2013 2013 10 29 151 37 58 47.5 15.5 5641.5
10/30/2013 2013 10 30 152 37 45 41 9 5650.5
10/31/2013 2013 10 31 153 35 47 41 9 5659.5
11/1/2013 2013 11 1 154 31 55 43 11 5670.5
11/2/2013 2013 11 2 155 32 54 43 11 5681.5
11/3/2013 2013 11 3 156 33 60 46.5 14.5 5696
11/4/2013 2013 11 4 157 27 42 34.5 2.5 5698.5
11/5/2013 2013 11 5 158 26 41 33.5 1.5 5700
11/6/2013 2013 11 6 159 23 44 33.5 1.5 5701.5
11/7/2013 2013 11 7 160 26 51 38.5 6.5 5708
11/8/2013 2013 11 8 161 29 57 43 11 5719
11/9/2013 2013 11 9 162 28 57 42.5 10.5 5729.5
11/10/2013 2013 11 10 163 30 59 44.5 12.5 5742
11/11/2013 2013 11 11 164 30 60 45 13 5755
11/12/2013 2013 11 12 165 32 62 47 15 5770
11/13/2013 2013 11 13 166 29 52 40.5 8.5 5778.5
11/14/2013 2013 11 14 167 30 56 43 11 5789.5
11/15/2013 2013 11 15 168 27 57 42 10 5799.5
11/16/2013 2013 11 16 169 30 47 38.5 6.5 5806
11/17/2013 2013 11 17 170 31 53 42 10 5816
11/18/2013 2013 11 18 171 31 54 42.5 10.5 5826.5
11/19/2013 2013 11 19 172 31 46 38.5 6.5 5833
11/20/2013 2013 11 20 173 30 48 39 7 5840
11/21/2013 2013 11 21 174 34 47 40.5 8.5 5848.5
11/22/2013 2013 11 22 175 30 37 33.5 1.5 5850
11/23/2013 2013 11 23 176 30 36 33 1 5851
11/24/2013 2013 11 24 177 30 38 34 2 5853
11/25/2013 2013 11 25 178 28 45 36.5 4.5 5857.5
11/26/2013 2013 11 26 179 28 46 37 5 5862.5
11/27/2013 2013 11 27 180 26 43 34.5 2.5 5865
11/28/2013 2013 11 28 181 28 38 33 1 5866
11/29/2013 2013 11 29 182 30 36 33 1 5867
11/30/2013 2013 11 30 183 33 37 35 3 5870
12/1/2013 2013 12 1 184 32 36 34 2 5872
12/2/2013 2013 12 2 185 30 34 32 0 5872
12/3/2013 2013 12 3 186 28 38 33 1 5873
12/4/2013 2013 12 4 187 -7 28 10.5 -21.5 5851.5
12/5/2013 2013 12 5 188 -9 12 1.5 -30.5 5821
12/6/2013 2013 12 6 189 -7 14 3.5 -28.5 5792.5
12/7/2013 2013 12 7 190 9 22 15.5 -16.5 5776
12/8/2013 2013 12 8 191 -2 21 9.5 -22.5 5753.5
12/9/2013 2013 12 9 192 -8 15 3.5 -28.5 5725
12/10/2013 2013 12 10 193 -10 11 0.5 -31.5 5693.5
12/11/2013 2013 12 11 194 -4 15 5.5 -26.5 5667
12/12/2013 2013 12 12 195 -2 19 8.5 -23.5 5643.5
12/13/2013 2013 12 13 196 -6 14 4 -28 5615.5
12/14/2013 2013 12 14 197 0 24 12 -20 5595.5
12/15/2013 2013 12 15 198 5 25 15 -17 5578.5
12/16/2013 2013 12 16 199 4 28 16 -16 5562.5
12/17/2013 2013 12 17 200 3 28 15.5 -16.5 5546
12/18/2013 2013 12 18 201 5 25 15 -17 5529
12/19/2013 2013 12 19 202 16 32 24 -8 5521
12/20/2013 2013 12 20 203 17 30 23.5 -8.5 5512.5
12/21/2013 2013 12 21 204 10 27 18.5 -13.5 5499
12/22/2013 2013 12 22 205 3 25 14 -18 5481
12/23/2013 2013 12 23 206 8 29 18.5 -13.5 5467.5
12/24/2013 2013 12 24 207 11 29 20 -12 5455.5
12/25/2013 2013 12 25 208 9 30 19.5 -12.5 5443
12/26/2013 2013 12 26 209 7 31 19 -13 5430
12/27/2013 2013 12 27 210 8 31 19.5 -12.5 5417.5
12/28/2013 2013 12 28 211 10 24 17 -15 5402.5
12/29/2013 2013 12 29 212 10 34 22 -10 5392.5
12/30/2013 2013 12 30 213 11 33 22 -10 5382.5
12/31/2013 2013 12 31 214 17 30 23.5 -8.5 5374
1/1/2014 2014 1 1 215 17 35 26 -6 5368
1/2/2014 2014 1 2 216 9 36 22.5 -9.5 5358.5
1/3/2014 2014 1 3 217 8 27 17.5 -14.5 5344
1/4/2014 2014 1 4 218 10 29 19.5 -12.5 5331.5
1/5/2014 2014 1 5 219 2 26 14 -18 5313.5
1/6/2014 2014 1 6 220 3 25 14 -18 5295.5
1/7/2014 2014 1 7 221 7 23 15 -17 5278.5
1/8/2014 2014 1 8 222 19 33 26 -6 5272.5
1/9/2014 2014 1 9 223 17 29 23 -9 5263.5
1/10/2014 2014 1 10 224 11 31 21 -11 5252.5
1/11/2014 2014 1 11 225 14 33 23.5 -8.5 5244
1/12/2014 2014 1 12 226 19 38 28.5 -3.5 5240.5
1/13/2014 2014 1 13 227 13 32 22.5 -9.5 5231
1/14/2014 2014 1 14 228 12 32 22 -10 5221
1/15/2014 2014 1 15 229 13 36 24.5 -7.5 5213.5
1/16/2014 2014 1 16 230 14 38 26 -6 5207.5
1/17/2014 2014 1 17 231 16 37 26.5 -5.5 5202
1/18/2014 2014 1 18 232 17 42 29.5 -2.5 5199.5
1/19/2014 2014 1 19 233 14 36 25 -7 5192.5
1/20/2014 2014 1 20 234 16 40 28 -4 5188.5
1/21/2014 2014 1 21 235 18 37 27.5 -4.5 5184
1/22/2014 2014 1 22 236 16 37 26.5 -5.5 5178.5
1/23/2014 2014 1 23 237 17 40 28.5 -3.5 5175
1/24/2014 2014 1 24 238 13 35 24 -8 5167
1/25/2014 2014 1 25 239 17 34 25.5 -6.5 5160.5
1/26/2014 2014 1 26 240 16 36 26 -6 5154.5
1/27/2014 2014 1 27 241 16 37 26.5 -5.5 5149
1/28/2014 2014 1 28 242 23 39 31 -1 5148
1/29/2014 2014 1 29 243 17 37 27 -5 5143
1/30/2014 2014 1 30 244 30 35 32.5 0.5 5143.5
1/31/2014 2014 1 31 245 27 32 29.5 -2.5 5141
2/1/2014 2014 2 1 246 11 30 20.5 -11.5 5129.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
2/2/2014 2014 2 2 247 7 27 17 -15 5114.5
2/3/2014 2014 2 3 248 20 30 25 -7 5107.5
2/4/2014 2014 2 4 249 14 33 23.5 -8.5 5099
2/5/2014 2014 2 5 250 8 28 18 -14 5085
2/6/2014 2014 2 6 251 6 31 18.5 -13.5 5071.5
2/7/2014 2014 2 7 252 26 38 32 0 5071.5
2/8/2014 2014 2 8 253 26 42 34 2 5073.5
2/9/2014 2014 2 9 254 28 38 33 1 5074.5
2/10/2014 2014 2 10 255 30 40 35 3 5077.5
2/11/2014 2014 2 11 256 26 42 34 2 5079.5
2/12/2014 2014 2 12 257 26 42 34 2 5081.5
2/13/2014 2014 2 13 258 29 47 38 6 5087.5
2/14/2014 2014 2 14 259 31 50 40.5 8.5 5096
2/15/2014 2014 2 15 260 32 49 40.5 8.5 5104.5
2/16/2014 2014 2 16 261 35 62 48.5 16.5 5121
2/17/2014 2014 2 17 262 32 53 42.5 10.5 5131.5
2/18/2014 2014 2 18 263 28 55 41.5 9.5 5141
2/19/2014 2014 2 19 264 31 52 41.5 9.5 5150.5
2/20/2014 2014 2 20 265 24 39 31.5 -0.5 5150
2/21/2014 2014 2 21 266 26 50 38 6 5156
2/22/2014 2014 2 22 267 26 54 40 8 5164
2/23/2014 2014 2 23 268 29 56 42.5 10.5 5174.5
2/24/2014 2014 2 24 269 28 58 43 11 5185.5
2/25/2014 2014 2 25 270 30 60 45 13 5198.5
2/26/2014 2014 2 26 271 29 58 43.5 11.5 5210
2/27/2014 2014 2 27 272 36 52 44 12 5222
2/28/2014 2014 2 28 273 33 52 42.5 10.5 5232.5
3/1/2014 2014 3 1 274 38 57 47.5 15.5 5248
3/2/2014 2014 3 2 275 34 55 44.5 12.5 5260.5
3/3/2014 2014 3 3 276 35 56 45.5 13.5 5274
3/4/2014 2014 3 4 277 37 54 45.5 13.5 5287.5
3/5/2014 2014 3 5 278 28 54 41 9 5296.5
3/6/2014 2014 3 6 279 34 60 47 15 5311.5
3/7/2014 2014 3 7 280 36 51 43.5 11.5 5323
3/8/2014 2014 3 8 281 31 55 43 11 5334
3/9/2014 2014 3 9 282 29 57 43 11 5345
3/10/2014 2014 3 10 283 34 62 48 16 5361
3/11/2014 2014 3 11 284 35 46 40.5 8.5 5369.5
3/12/2014 2014 3 12 285 24 52 38 6 5375.5
3/13/2014 2014 3 13 286 26 56 41 9 5384.5
3/14/2014 2014 3 14 287 29 60 44.5 12.5 5397
3/15/2014 2014 3 15 288 29 51 40 8 5405
3/16/2014 2014 3 16 289 24 58 41 9 5414
3/17/2014 2014 3 17 290 28 65 46.5 14.5 5428.5
3/18/2014 2014 3 18 291 27 46 36.5 4.5 5433
3/19/2014 2014 3 19 292 24 50 37 5 5438
3/20/2014 2014 3 20 293 26 57 41.5 9.5 5447.5
3/21/2014 2014 3 21 294 31 62 46.5 14.5 5462
3/22/2014 2014 3 22 295 33 51 42 10 5472
3/23/2014 2014 3 23 296 29 60 44.5 12.5 5484.5
3/24/2014 2014 3 24 297 27 62 44.5 12.5 5497
3/25/2014 2014 3 25 298 32 65 48.5 16.5 5513.5
3/26/2014 2014 3 26 299 45 62 53.5 21.5 5535
3/27/2014 2014 3 27 300 36 56 46 14 5549
3/28/2014 2014 3 28 301 28 55 41.5 9.5 5558.5
3/29/2014 2014 3 29 302 32 61 46.5 14.5 5573
3/30/2014 2014 3 30 303 38 65 51.5 19.5 5592.5
3/31/2014 2014 3 31 304 25 52 38.5 6.5 5599
4/1/2014 2014 4 1 305 40 59 49.5 17.5 5616.5
4/2/2014 2014 4 2 306 32 47 39.5 7.5 5624
4/3/2014 2014 4 3 307 30 50 40 8 5632
4/4/2014 2014 4 4 308 29 53 41 9 5641
4/5/2014 2014 4 5 309 39 58 48.5 16.5 5657.5
4/6/2014 2014 4 6 310 36 55 45.5 13.5 5671
4/7/2014 2014 4 7 311 31 60 45.5 13.5 5684.5
4/8/2014 2014 4 8 312 35 67 51 19 5703.5
4/9/2014 2014 4 9 313 39 75 57 25 5728.5
4/10/2014 2014 4 10 314 41 75 58 26 5754.5
4/11/2014 2014 4 11 315 38 76 57 25 5779.5
4/12/2014 2014 4 12 316 47 72 59.5 27.5 5807
4/13/2014 2014 4 13 317 29 52 40.5 8.5 5815.5
4/14/2014 2014 4 14 318 24 47 35.5 3.5 5819
4/15/2014 2014 4 15 319 31 59 45 13 5832
4/16/2014 2014 4 16 320 36 59 47.5 15.5 5847.5
4/17/2014 2014 4 17 321 35 66 50.5 18.5 5866
4/18/2014 2014 4 18 322 45 76 60.5 28.5 5894.5
4/19/2014 2014 4 19 323 46 64 55 23 5917.5
4/20/2014 2014 4 20 324 40 72 56 24 5941.5
4/21/2014 2014 4 21 325 42 75 58.5 26.5 5968
4/22/2014 2014 4 22 326 53 75 64 32 6000
4/23/2014 2014 4 23 327 37 65 51 19 6019
4/24/2014 2014 4 24 328 28 64 46 14 6033
4/25/2014 2014 4 25 329 44 74 59 27 6060
4/26/2014 2014 4 26 330 39 61 50 18 6078
4/27/2014 2014 4 27 331 38 54 46 14 6092
4/28/2014 2014 4 28 332 33 53 43 11 6103
4/29/2014 2014 4 29 333 28 50 39 7 6110
4/30/2014 2014 4 30 334 36 53 44.5 12.5 6122.5
5/1/2014 2014 5 1 335 25 65 45 13 6135.5
5/2/2014 2014 5 2 336 37 73 55 23 6158.5
5/3/2014 2014 5 3 337 45 80 62.5 30.5 6189
5/4/2014 2014 5 4 338 56 82 69 37 6226
5/5/2014 2014 5 5 339 55 79 67 35 6261
5/6/2014 2014 5 6 340 57 72 64.5 32.5 6293.5
5/7/2014 2014 5 7 341 47 67 57 25 6318.5
5/8/2014 2014 5 8 342 44 61 52.5 20.5 6339
5/9/2014 2014 5 9 343 43 66 54.5 22.5 6361.5
5/10/2014 2014 5 10 344 42 63 52.5 20.5 6382
5/11/2014 2014 5 11 345 37 50 43.5 11.5 6393.5
5/12/2014 2014 5 12 346 34 50 42 10 6403.5
5/13/2014 2014 5 13 347 31 56 43.5 11.5 6415
5/14/2014 2014 5 14 348 33 63 48 16 6431
5/15/2014 2014 5 15 349 40 71 55.5 23.5 6454.5
5/16/2014 2014 5 16 350 47 76 61.5 29.5 6484
5/17/2014 2014 5 17 351 46 81 63.5 31.5 6515.5
5/18/2014 2014 5 18 352 54 84 69 37 6552.5
5/19/2014 2014 5 19 353 59 82 70.5 38.5 6591
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
5/20/2014 2014 5 20 354 58 81 69.5 37.5 6628.5
5/21/2014 2014 5 21 355 57 73 65 33 6661.5
5/22/2014 2014 5 22 356 58 77 67.5 35.5 6697
5/23/2014 2014 5 23 357 52 71 61.5 29.5 6726.5
5/24/2014 2014 5 24 358 44 71 57.5 25.5 6752
5/25/2014 2014 5 25 359 47 57 52 20 6772
5/26/2014 2014 5 26 360 40 74 57 25 6797
5/27/2014 2014 5 27 361 52 85 68.5 36.5 6833.5
5/28/2014 2014 5 28 362 57 90 73.5 41.5 6875
5/29/2014 2014 5 29 363 67 84 75.5 43.5 6918.5
5/30/2014 2014 5 30 364 58 81 69.5 37.5 6956
5/31/2014 2014 5 31 365 61 88 74.5 42.5 6998.5
6/1/2014 2014 6 1 1 54 85 69.5 37.5 37.5
6/2/2014 2014 6 2 2 50 88 69 37 74.5
6/3/2014 2014 6 3 3 62 87 74.5 42.5 79.5
6/4/2014 2014 6 4 4 51 88 69.5 37.5 80
6/5/2014 2014 6 5 5 60 88 74 42 79.5
6/6/2014 2014 6 6 6 53 88 70.5 38.5 80.5
6/7/2014 2014 6 7 7 56 89 72.5 40.5 79
6/8/2014 2014 6 8 8 48 71 59.5 27.5 68
6/9/2014 2014 6 9 9 43 76 59.5 27.5 55
6/10/2014 2014 6 10 10 51 85 68 36 63.5
6/11/2014 2014 6 11 11 63 85 74 42 78
6/12/2014 2014 6 12 12 53 87 70 38 80
6/13/2014 2014 6 13 13 59 91 75 43 81
6/14/2014 2014 6 14 14 53 76 64.5 32.5 75.5
6/15/2014 2014 6 15 15 49 82 65.5 33.5 66
6/16/2014 2014 6 16 16 65 84 74.5 42.5 76
6/17/2014 2014 6 17 17 53 88 70.5 38.5 81
6/18/2014 2014 6 18 18 49 76 62.5 30.5 69
6/19/2014 2014 6 19 19 45 79 62 30 60.5
6/20/2014 2014 6 20 20 53 88 70.5 38.5 68.5
6/21/2014 2014 6 21 21 62 89 75.5 43.5 82
6/22/2014 2014 6 22 22 64 89 76.5 44.5 88
6/23/2014 2014 6 23 23 59 89 74 42 86.5
6/24/2014 2014 6 24 24 61 92 76.5 44.5 86.5
6/25/2014 2014 6 25 25 60 93 76.5 44.5 89
6/26/2014 2014 6 26 26 62 93 77.5 45.5 90
6/27/2014 2014 6 27 27 63 82 72.5 40.5 86
6/28/2014 2014 6 28 28 52 86 69 37 77.5
6/29/2014 2014 6 29 29 58 95 76.5 44.5 81.5
6/30/2014 2014 6 30 30 61 95 78 46 90.5
7/1/2014 2014 7 1 31 69 91 80 48 94
7/2/2014 2014 7 2 32 59 93 76 44 92
7/3/2014 2014 7 3 33 63 92 77.5 45.5 89.5
7/4/2014 2014 7 4 34 71 94 82.5 50.5 96
7/5/2014 2014 7 5 35 72 93 82.5 50.5 101
7/6/2014 2014 7 6 36 64 99 81.5 49.5 100
7/7/2014 2014 7 7 37 67 97 82 50 99.5
7/8/2014 2014 7 8 38 65 96 80.5 48.5 98.5
7/9/2014 2014 7 9 39 71 93 82 50 98.5
7/10/2014 2014 7 10 40 65 91 78 46 96
7/11/2014 2014 7 11 41 65 92 78.5 46.5 92.5
7/12/2014 2014 7 12 42 66 95 80.5 48.5 95
7/13/2014 2014 7 13 43 70 97 83.5 51.5 100
7/14/2014 2014 7 14 44 67 94 80.5 48.5 100
7/15/2014 2014 7 15 45 70 93 81.5 49.5 98
7/16/2014 2014 7 16 46 65 92 78.5 46.5 96
7/17/2014 2014 7 17 47 63 91 77 45 91.5
7/18/2014 2014 7 18 48 62 94 78 46 91
7/19/2014 2014 7 19 49 64 96 80 48 94
7/20/2014 2014 7 20 50 69 93 81 49 97
7/21/2014 2014 7 21 51 64 95 79.5 47.5 96.5
7/22/2014 2014 7 22 52 63 98 80.5 48.5 96
7/23/2014 2014 7 23 53 71 98 84.5 52.5 101
7/24/2014 2014 7 24 54 80 96 88 56 108.5
7/25/2014 2014 7 25 55 75 97 86 54 110
7/26/2014 2014 7 26 56 63 99 81 49 103
7/27/2014 2014 7 27 57 61 100 80.5 48.5 97.5
7/28/2014 2014 7 28 58 66 91 78.5 46.5 95
7/29/2014 2014 7 29 59 63 88 75.5 43.5 90
7/30/2014 2014 7 30 60 59 91 75 43 86.5
7/31/2014 2014 7 31 61 64 91 77.5 45.5 88.5
8/1/2014 2014 8 1 62 61 93 77 45 90.5
8/2/2014 2014 8 2 63 63 95 79 47 92
8/3/2014 2014 8 3 64 66 84 75 43 90
8/4/2014 2014 8 4 65 66 90 78 46 89
8/5/2014 2014 8 5 66 63 91 77 45 91
8/6/2014 2014 8 6 67 61 97 79 47 92
8/7/2014 2014 8 7 68 59 95 77 45 92
8/8/2014 2014 8 8 69 55 95 75 43 88
8/9/2014 2014 8 9 70 55 97 76 44 87
8/10/2014 2014 8 10 71 57 95 76 44 88
8/11/2014 2014 8 11 72 59 97 78 46 90
8/12/2014 2014 8 12 73 68 90 79 47 93
8/13/2014 2014 8 13 74 64 72 68 36 83
8/14/2014 2014 8 14 75 63 84 73.5 41.5 77.5
8/15/2014 2014 8 15 76 61 93 77 45 86.5
8/16/2014 2014 8 16 77 63 97 80 48 93
8/17/2014 2014 8 17 78 61 99 80 48 96
8/18/2014 2014 8 18 79 59 99 79 47 95
8/19/2014 2014 8 19 80 61 77 69 37 84
8/20/2014 2014 8 20 81 55 82 68.5 36.5 73.5
8/21/2014 2014 8 21 82 52 86 69 37 73.5
8/22/2014 2014 8 22 83 64 86 75 43 80
8/23/2014 2014 8 23 84 59 75 67 35 78
8/24/2014 2014 8 24 85 59 86 72.5 40.5 75.5
8/25/2014 2014 8 25 86 59 90 74.5 42.5 83
8/26/2014 2014 8 26 87 59 82 70.5 38.5 81
8/27/2014 2014 8 27 88 55 77 66 34 72.5
8/28/2014 2014 8 28 89 54 84 69 37 71
8/29/2014 2014 8 29 90 54 88 71 39 76
8/30/2014 2014 8 30 91 57 95 76 44 83
8/31/2014 2014 8 31 92 64 91 77.5 45.5 89.5
9/1/2014 2014 9 1 93 52 91 71.5 39.5 85
9/2/2014 2014 9 2 94 54 97 75.5 43.5 83
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
9/3/2014 2014 9 3 95 54 97 75.5 43.5 87
9/4/2014 2014 9 4 96 55 90 72.5 40.5 84
9/5/2014 2014 9 5 97 57 86 71.5 39.5 80
9/6/2014 2014 9 6 98 52 90 71 39 78.5
9/7/2014 2014 9 7 99 59 86 72.5 40.5 79.5
9/8/2014 2014 9 8 100 63 82 72.5 40.5 81
9/9/2014 2014 9 9 101 55 79 67 35 75.5
9/10/2014 2014 9 10 102 52 81 66.5 34.5 69.5
9/11/2014 2014 9 11 103 48 86 67 35 69.5
9/12/2014 2014 9 12 104 52 82 67 35 70
9/13/2014 2014 9 13 105 46 88 67 35 70
9/14/2014 2014 9 14 106 52 91 71.5 39.5 74.5
9/15/2014 2014 9 15 107 55 91 73 41 80.5
9/16/2014 2014 9 16 108 54 91 72.5 40.5 81.5
9/17/2014 2014 9 17 109 55 91 73 41 81.5
9/18/2014 2014 9 18 110 59 91 75 43 84
9/19/2014 2014 9 19 111 55 90 72.5 40.5 83.5
9/20/2014 2014 9 20 112 55 93 74 42 82.5
9/21/2014 2014 9 21 113 61 77 69 37 79
9/22/2014 2014 9 22 114 57 82 69.5 37.5 74.5
9/23/2014 2014 9 23 115 54 86 70 38 75.5
9/24/2014 2014 9 24 116 52 88 70 38 76
9/25/2014 2014 9 25 117 50 91 70.5 38.5 76.5
9/26/2014 2014 9 26 118 52 91 71.5 39.5 78
9/27/2014 2014 9 27 119 57 81 69 37 76.5
9/28/2014 2014 9 28 120 50 70 60 28 65
9/29/2014 2014 9 29 121 50 64 57 25 53
9/30/2014 2014 9 30 122 48 72 60 28 53
10/1/2014 2014 10 1 123 48 63 55.5 23.5 51.5
10/2/2014 2014 10 2 124 36 64 50 18 41.5
10/3/2014 2014 10 3 125 37 72 54.5 22.5 40.5
10/4/2014 2014 10 4 126 41 77 59 27 49.5
10/5/2014 2014 10 5 127 41 77 59 27 54
10/6/2014 2014 10 6 128 41 79 60 28 55
10/7/2014 2014 10 7 129 43 77 60 28 56
10/8/2014 2014 10 8 130 50 73 61.5 29.5 57.5
10/9/2014 2014 10 9 131 55 73 64 32 61.5
10/10/2014 2014 10 10 132 43 77 60 28 60
10/11/2014 2014 10 11 133 46 77 61.5 29.5 57.5
10/12/2014 2014 10 12 134 45 66 55.5 23.5 53
10/13/2014 2014 10 13 135 34 64 49 17 40.5
10/14/2014 2014 10 14 136 34 70 52 20 37
10/15/2014 2014 10 15 137 37 77 57 25 45
10/16/2014 2014 10 16 138 41 79 60 28 53
10/17/2014 2014 10 17 139 37 73 55 23 51
10/18/2014 2014 10 18 140 50 73 61.5 29.5 52.5
10/19/2014 2014 10 19 141 39 77 58 26 55.5
10/20/2014 2014 10 20 142 41 75 58 26 52
10/21/2014 2014 10 21 143 43 77 60 28 54
10/22/2014 2014 10 22 144 39 73 56 24 52
10/23/2014 2014 10 23 145 37 75 56 24 48
10/24/2014 2014 10 24 146 36 81 58.5 26.5 50.5
10/25/2014 2014 10 25 147 36 81 58.5 26.5 53
10/26/2014 2014 10 26 148 52 77 64.5 32.5 59
10/27/2014 2014 10 27 149 43 61 52 20 52.5
10/28/2014 2014 10 28 150 30 64 47 15 35
10/29/2014 2014 10 29 151 28 66 47 15 30
10/30/2014 2014 10 30 152 28 70 49 17 32
10/31/2014 2014 10 31 153 32 70 51 19 36
11/1/2014 2014 11 1 154 45 73 59 27 46
11/2/2014 2014 11 2 155 41 59 50 18 45
11/3/2014 2014 11 3 156 32 50 41 9 27
11/4/2014 2014 11 4 157 27 55 41 9 18
11/5/2014 2014 11 5 158 25 61 43 11 20
11/6/2014 2014 11 6 159 25 61 43 11 22
11/7/2014 2014 11 7 160 27 63 45 13 24
11/8/2014 2014 11 8 161 28 64 46 14 27
11/9/2014 2014 11 9 162 28 61 44.5 12.5 26.5
11/10/2014 2014 11 10 163 27 64 45.5 13.5 26
11/11/2014 2014 11 11 164 19 55 37 5 18.5
11/12/2014 2014 11 12 165 27 46 36.5 4.5 9.5
11/13/2014 2014 11 13 166 23 39 31 -1 3.5
11/14/2014 2014 11 14 167 27 41 34 2 1
11/15/2014 2014 11 15 168 21 52 36.5 4.5 6.5
11/16/2014 2014 11 16 169 14 37 25.5 -6.5 -2
11/17/2014 2014 11 17 170 9 43 26 -6 -12.5
11/18/2014 2014 11 18 171 10 45 27.5 -4.5 -10.5
11/19/2014 2014 11 19 172 14 41 27.5 -4.5 -9
1/28/2015 2015 1 28 242 32 54 43 11 6.5
1/29/2015 2015 1 29 243 28 52 40 8 19
1/30/2015 2015 1 30 244 37 45 41 9 17
1/31/2015 2015 1 31 245 34 46 40 8 17
2/1/2015 2015 2 1 246 27 52 39.5 7.5 15.5
2/2/2015 2015 2 2 247 28 54 41 9 16.5
2/3/2015 2015 2 3 248 28 52 40 8 17
2/4/2015 2015 2 4 249 28 63 45.5 13.5 21.5
2/5/2015 2015 2 5 250 32 59 45.5 13.5 27
2/6/2015 2015 2 6 251 25 59 42 10 23.5
2/7/2015 2015 2 7 252 32 66 49 17 27
2/8/2015 2015 2 8 253 28 64 46 14 31
2/9/2015 2015 2 9 254 28 70 49 17 31
2/10/2015 2015 2 10 255 28 61 44.5 12.5 29.5
2/11/2015 2015 2 11 256 23 59 41 9 21.5
2/12/2015 2015 2 12 257 23 59 41 9 18
2/13/2015 2015 2 13 258 23 63 43 11 20
2/14/2015 2015 2 14 259 23 63 43 11 22
2/15/2015 2015 2 15 260 25 63 44 12 23
2/16/2015 2015 2 16 261 28 55 41.5 9.5 21.5
2/17/2015 2015 2 17 262 14 52 33 1 10.5
2/18/2015 2015 2 18 263 18 59 38.5 6.5 7.5
2/19/2015 2015 2 19 264 19 61 40 8 14.5
2/20/2015 2015 2 20 265 23 63 43 11 19
2/21/2015 2015 2 21 266 25 54 39.5 7.5 18.5
2/22/2015 2015 2 22 267 32 43 37.5 5.5 13
2/23/2015 2015 2 23 268 27 34 30.5 -1.5 4
2/24/2015 2015 2 24 269 28 50 39 7 5.5
2/25/2015 2015 2 25 270 28 59 43.5 11.5 18.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
2/26/2015 2015 2 26 271 27 45 36 4 15.5
2/27/2015 2015 2 27 272 19 46 32.5 0.5 4.5
2/28/2015 2015 2 28 273 30 41 35.5 3.5 4
3/1/2015 2015 3 1 274 28 43 35.5 3.5 7
3/2/2015 2015 3 2 275 32 46 39 7 10.5
3/3/2015 2015 3 3 276 28 50 39 7 14
3/4/2015 2015 3 4 277 23 45 34 2 9
3/5/2015 2015 3 5 278 21 50 35.5 3.5 5.5
3/6/2015 2015 3 6 279 21 55 38 6 9.5
3/7/2015 2015 3 7 280 23 61 42 10 16
3/8/2015 2015 3 8 281 25 63 44 12 22
3/9/2015 2015 3 9 282 27 63 45 13 25
3/10/2015 2015 3 10 283 32 64 48 16 29
3/11/2015 2015 3 11 284 30 63 46.5 14.5 30.5
3/12/2015 2015 3 12 285 41 61 51 19 33.5
3/13/2015 2015 3 13 286 30 68 49 17 36
3/14/2015 2015 3 14 287 32 68 50 18 35
3/15/2015 2015 3 15 288 30 72 51 19 37
3/16/2015 2015 3 16 289 30 75 52.5 20.5 39.5
3/17/2015 2015 3 17 290 30 75 52.5 20.5 41
3/18/2015 2015 3 18 291 45 70 57.5 25.5 46
3/19/2015 2015 3 19 292 34 66 50 18 43.5
3/20/2015 2015 3 20 293 28 70 49 17 35
3/21/2015 2015 3 21 294 27 73 50 18 35
3/22/2015 2015 3 22 295 36 75 55.5 23.5 41.5
3/23/2015 2015 3 23 296 50 73 61.5 29.5 53
3/24/2015 2015 3 24 297 32 68 50 18 47.5
3/25/2015 2015 3 25 298 41 61 51 19 37
3/26/2015 2015 3 26 299 27 68 47.5 15.5 34.5
3/27/2015 2015 3 27 300 32 77 54.5 22.5 38
3/28/2015 2015 3 28 301 32 81 56.5 24.5 47
3/29/2015 2015 3 29 302 41 77 59 27 51.5
3/30/2015 2015 3 30 303 32 81 56.5 24.5 51.5
3/31/2015 2015 3 31 304 34 81 57.5 25.5 50
4/1/2015 2015 4 1 305 46 70 58 26 51.5
4/2/2015 2015 4 2 306 32 59 45.5 13.5 39.5
4/3/2015 2015 4 3 307 25 55 40 8 21.5
4/4/2015 2015 4 4 308 19 70 44.5 12.5 20.5
4/5/2015 2015 4 5 309 28 73 50.5 18.5 31
4/6/2015 2015 4 6 310 41 72 56.5 24.5 43
4/7/2015 2015 4 7 311 50 70 60 28 52.5
4/8/2015 2015 4 8 312 45 59 52 20 48
4/9/2015 2015 4 9 313 27 63 45 13 33
4/10/2015 2015 4 10 314 27 70 48.5 16.5 29.5
4/11/2015 2015 4 11 315 34 75 54.5 22.5 39
4/12/2015 2015 4 12 316 43 72 57.5 25.5 48
4/13/2015 2015 4 13 317 32 75 53.5 21.5 47
4/14/2015 2015 4 14 318 32 79 55.5 23.5 45
4/15/2015 2015 4 15 319 32 50 41 9 32.5
4/16/2015 2015 4 16 320 28 46 37 5 14
4/17/2015 2015 4 17 321 37 57 47 15 20
4/18/2015 2015 4 18 322 41 73 57 25 40
4/19/2015 2015 4 19 323 36 70 53 21 46
4/20/2015 2015 4 20 324 43 73 58 26 47
4/21/2015 2015 4 21 325 32 77 54.5 22.5 48.5
4/22/2015 2015 4 22 326 41 72 56.5 24.5 47
4/23/2015 2015 4 23 327 36 73 54.5 22.5 47
4/24/2015 2015 4 24 328 37 72 54.5 22.5 45
4/25/2015 2015 4 25 329 46 59 52.5 20.5 43
4/26/2015 2015 4 26 330 43 63 53 21 41.5
4/27/2015 2015 4 27 331 37 70 53.5 21.5 42.5
4/28/2015 2015 4 28 332 37 73 55 23 44.5
4/29/2015 2015 4 29 333 39 82 60.5 28.5 51.5
4/30/2015 2015 4 30 334 45 86 65.5 33.5 62
5/1/2015 2015 5 1 335 45 86 65.5 33.5 67
5/2/2015 2015 5 2 336 46 86 66 34 67.5
5/3/2015 2015 5 3 337 55 81 68 36 70
5/4/2015 2015 5 4 338 54 73 63.5 31.5 67.5
5/5/2015 2015 5 5 339 52 66 59 27 58.5
5/6/2015 2015 5 6 340 52 72 62 30 57
5/7/2015 2015 5 7 341 45 73 59 27 57
5/8/2015 2015 5 8 342 45 68 56.5 24.5 51.5
5/9/2015 2015 5 9 343 41 63 52 20 44.5
5/10/2015 2015 5 10 344 45 68 56.5 24.5 44.5
5/11/2015 2015 5 11 345 39 73 56 24 48.5
5/12/2015 2015 5 12 346 45 81 63 31 55
5/13/2015 2015 5 13 347 54 79 66.5 34.5 65.5
5/14/2015 2015 5 14 348 46 64 55 23 57.5
5/15/2015 2015 5 15 349 46 59 52.5 20.5 43.5
5/16/2015 2015 5 16 350 45 64 54.5 22.5 43
5/17/2015 2015 5 17 351 43 73 58 26 48.5
5/18/2015 2015 5 18 352 46 72 59 27 53
5/19/2015 2015 5 19 353 39 70 54.5 22.5 49.5
5/20/2015 2015 5 20 354 43 75 59 27 49.5
5/21/2015 2015 5 21 355 45 77 61 29 56
5/22/2015 2015 5 22 356 48 73 60.5 28.5 57.5
5/23/2015 2015 5 23 357 43 61 52 20 48.5
5/24/2015 2015 5 24 358 41 72 56.5 24.5 44.5
5/25/2015 2015 5 25 359 52 73 62.5 30.5 55
5/26/2015 2015 5 26 360 50 77 63.5 31.5 62
5/27/2015 2015 5 27 361 52 79 65.5 33.5 65
5/28/2015 2015 5 28 362 46 81 63.5 31.5 65
5/29/2015 2015 5 29 363 48 81 64.5 32.5 64
5/30/2015 2015 5 30 364 46 90 68 36 68.5
5/31/2015 2015 5 31 365 50 93 71.5 39.5 75.5
6/1/2015 2015 6 1 1 52 95 73.5 41.5 41.5
6/2/2015 2015 6 2 2 54 91 72.5 40.5 82
6/3/2015 2015 6 3 3 50 88 69 37 119
6/4/2015 2015 6 4 4 45 90 67.5 35.5 154.5
6/5/2015 2015 6 5 5 55 75 65 33 187.5
6/6/2015 2015 6 6 6 54 72 63 31 218.5
6/7/2015 2015 6 7 7 50 77 63.5 31.5 250
6/8/2015 2015 6 8 8 50 86 68 36 286
6/9/2015 2015 6 9 9 52 93 72.5 40.5 326.5
6/10/2015 2015 6 10 10 61 81 71 39 365.5
6/11/2015 2015 6 11 11 59 68 63.5 31.5 397
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
6/12/2015 2015 6 12 12 54 81 67.5 35.5 432.5
6/13/2015 2015 6 13 13 57 90 73.5 41.5 474
6/14/2015 2015 6 14 14 59 91 75 43 517
6/15/2015 2015 6 15 15 57 91 74 42 559
6/16/2015 2015 6 16 16 64 97 80.5 48.5 607.5
6/17/2015 2015 6 17 17 54 99 76.5 44.5 652
6/18/2015 2015 6 18 18 59 100 79.5 47.5 699.5
6/19/2015 2015 6 19 19 55 100 77.5 45.5 745
6/20/2015 2015 6 20 20 55 102 78.5 46.5 791.5
6/21/2015 2015 6 21 21 59 104 81.5 49.5 841
6/22/2015 2015 6 22 22 59 102 80.5 48.5 889.5
6/23/2015 2015 6 23 23 61 104 82.5 50.5 940
6/24/2015 2015 6 24 24 70 99 84.5 52.5 992.5
6/25/2015 2015 6 25 25 70 102 86 54 1046.5
6/26/2015 2015 6 26 26 57 102 79.5 47.5 1094
6/27/2015 2015 6 27 27 63 104 83.5 51.5 1145.5
6/28/2015 2015 6 28 28 63 104 83.5 51.5 1197
6/29/2015 2015 6 29 29 73 104 88.5 56.5 1253.5
6/30/2015 2015 6 30 30 68 106 87 55 1308.5
7/1/2015 2015 7 1 31 70 102 86 54 1362.5
7/2/2015 2015 7 2 32 79 100 89.5 57.5 1420
7/3/2015 2015 7 3 33 68 100 84 52 1472
7/4/2015 2015 7 4 34 68 99 83.5 51.5 1523.5
7/5/2015 2015 7 5 35 64 88 76 44 1567.5
7/6/2015 2015 7 6 36 64 88 76 44 1611.5
7/7/2015 2015 7 7 37 64 82 73 41 1652.5
7/8/2015 2015 7 8 38 64 86 75 43 1695.5
7/9/2015 2015 7 9 39 59 86 72.5 40.5 1736
7/10/2015 2015 7 10 40 55 84 69.5 37.5 1773.5
7/11/2015 2015 7 11 41 55 88 71.5 39.5 1813
7/12/2015 2015 7 12 42 68 93 80.5 48.5 1861.5
7/13/2015 2015 7 13 43 70 90 80 48 1909.5
7/14/2015 2015 7 14 44 63 88 75.5 43.5 1953
7/15/2015 2015 7 15 45 59 88 73.5 41.5 1994.5
7/16/2015 2015 7 16 46 61 93 77 45 2039.5
7/17/2015 2015 7 17 47 59 97 78 46 2085.5
7/18/2015 2015 7 18 48 66 86 76 44 2129.5
7/19/2015 2015 7 19 49 63 86 74.5 42.5 2172
7/20/2015 2015 7 20 50 59 84 71.5 39.5 2211.5
7/21/2015 2015 7 21 51 61 86 73.5 41.5 2253
7/22/2015 2015 7 22 52 55 93 74 42 2295
7/23/2015 2015 7 23 53 55 95 75 43 2338
7/24/2015 2015 7 24 54 57 95 76 44 2382
7/25/2015 2015 7 25 55 59 97 78 46 2428
7/26/2015 2015 7 26 56 55 97 76 44 2472
7/27/2015 2015 7 27 57 61 97 79 47 2519
7/28/2015 2015 7 28 58 54 93 73.5 41.5 2560.5
7/29/2015 2015 7 29 59 54 97 75.5 43.5 2604
7/30/2015 2015 7 30 60 59 99 79 47 2651
7/31/2015 2015 7 31 61 64 99 81.5 49.5 2700.5
8/1/2015 2015 8 1 62 68 91 79.5 47.5 2748
8/2/2015 2015 8 2 63 63 82 72.5 40.5 2788.5
8/3/2015 2015 8 3 64 59 86 72.5 40.5 2829
8/4/2015 2015 8 4 65 57 95 76 44 2873
8/5/2015 2015 8 5 66 57 99 78 46 2919
8/6/2015 2015 8 6 67 63 95 79 47 2966
8/7/2015 2015 8 7 68 61 81 71 39 3005
8/8/2015 2015 8 8 69 55 88 71.5 39.5 3044.5
8/9/2015 2015 8 9 70 54 90 72 40 3084.5
8/10/2015 2015 8 10 71 55 95 75 43 3127.5
8/11/2015 2015 8 11 72 63 81 72 40 3167.5
8/12/2015 2015 8 12 73 64 86 75 43 3210.5
8/13/2015 2015 8 13 74 59 95 77 45 3255.5
8/14/2015 2015 8 14 75 63 100 81.5 49.5 3305
8/15/2015 2015 8 15 76 64 100 82 50 3355
8/16/2015 2015 8 16 77 64 99 81.5 49.5 3404.5
8/17/2015 2015 8 17 78 63 99 81 49 3453.5
8/18/2015 2015 8 18 79 54 95 74.5 42.5 3496
8/19/2015 2015 8 19 80 59 90 74.5 42.5 3538.5
8/20/2015 2015 8 20 81 54 93 73.5 41.5 3580
8/21/2015 2015 8 21 82 59 100 79.5 47.5 3627.5
8/22/2015 2015 8 22 83 59 97 78 46 3673.5
8/23/2015 2015 8 23 84 68 95 81.5 49.5 3723
8/24/2015 2015 8 24 85 55 97 76 44 3767
8/25/2015 2015 8 25 86 59 99 79 47 3814
8/26/2015 2015 8 26 87 64 73 68.5 36.5 3850.5
8/27/2015 2015 8 27 88 61 90 75.5 43.5 3894
8/28/2015 2015 8 28 89 61 91 76 44 3938
8/29/2015 2015 8 29 90 54 95 74.5 42.5 3980.5
8/30/2015 2015 8 30 91 64 95 79.5 47.5 4028
8/31/2015 2015 8 31 92 64 86 75 43 4071
9/1/2015 2015 9 1 93 59 91 75 43 4114
9/2/2015 2015 9 2 94 54 91 72.5 40.5 4154.5
9/3/2015 2015 9 3 95 64 90 77 45 4199.5
9/4/2015 2015 9 4 96 64 88 76 44 4243.5
9/5/2015 2015 9 5 97 64 88 76 44 4287.5
9/6/2015 2015 9 6 98 54 90 72 40 4327.5
9/7/2015 2015 9 7 99 63 88 75.5 43.5 4371
9/8/2015 2015 9 8 100 59 90 74.5 42.5 4413.5
9/9/2015 2015 9 9 101 50 91 70.5 38.5 4452
9/10/2015 2015 9 10 102 48 91 69.5 37.5 4489.5
9/11/2015 2015 9 11 103 46 93 69.5 37.5 4527
9/12/2015 2015 9 12 104 46 95 70.5 38.5 4565.5
9/13/2015 2015 9 13 105 48 95 71.5 39.5 4605
9/14/2015 2015 9 14 106 66 86 76 44 4649
9/15/2015 2015 9 15 107 59 77 68 36 4685
9/16/2015 2015 9 16 108 79 79 79 47 4732
9/17/2015 2015 9 17 109 59 82 70.5 38.5 4770.5
9/18/2015 2015 9 18 110 54 79 66.5 34.5 4805
9/19/2015 2015 9 19 111 45 82 63.5 31.5 4836.5
9/20/2015 2015 9 20 112 43 86 64.5 32.5 4869
9/21/2015 2015 9 21 113 45 88 66.5 34.5 4903.5
9/22/2015 2015 9 22 114 50 82 66 34 4937.5
9/23/2015 2015 9 23 115 46 90 68 36 4973.5
9/24/2015 2015 9 24 116 46 91 68.5 36.5 5010
9/25/2015 2015 9 25 117 45 91 68 36 5046
9/26/2015 2015 9 26 118 46 90 68 36 5082
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
9/27/2015 2015 9 27 119 50 91 70.5 38.5 5120.5
9/28/2015 2015 9 28 120 54 90 72 40 5160.5
9/29/2015 2015 9 29 121 54 90 72 40 5200.5
9/30/2015 2015 9 30 122 55 90 72.5 40.5 5241
10/1/2015 2015 10 1 123 54 91 72.5 40.5 5281.5
10/2/2015 2015 10 2 124 54 81 67.5 35.5 5317
10/3/2015 2015 10 3 125 43 73 58 26 5343
10/4/2015 2015 10 4 126 43 79 61 29 5372
10/5/2015 2015 10 5 127 54 61 57.5 25.5 5397.5
10/6/2015 2015 10 6 128 52 63 57.5 25.5 5423
10/7/2015 2015 10 7 129 45 72 58.5 26.5 5449.5
10/8/2015 2015 10 8 130 48 77 62.5 30.5 5480
10/9/2015 2015 10 9 131 46 79 62.5 30.5 5510.5
10/10/2015 2015 10 10 132 46 81 63.5 31.5 5542
10/11/2015 2015 10 11 133 50 86 68 36 5578
10/12/2015 2015 10 12 134 43 81 62 30 5608
10/13/2015 2015 10 13 135 41 82 61.5 29.5 5637.5
10/14/2015 2015 10 14 136 43 82 62.5 30.5 5668
10/15/2015 2015 10 15 137 43 82 62.5 30.5 5698.5
10/16/2015 2015 10 16 138 43 79 61 29 5727.5
10/17/2015 2015 10 17 139 54 70 62 30 5757.5
10/18/2015 2015 10 18 140 52 73 62.5 30.5 5788
10/19/2015 2015 10 19 141 54 63 58.5 26.5 5814.5
10/20/2015 2015 10 20 142 50 57 53.5 21.5 5836
10/21/2015 2015 10 21 143 48 59 53.5 21.5 5857.5
10/22/2015 2015 10 22 144 46 66 56 24 5881.5
10/23/2015 2015 10 23 145 41 64 52.5 20.5 5902
10/24/2015 2015 10 24 146 39 66 52.5 20.5 5922.5
10/25/2015 2015 10 25 147 39 63 51 19 5941.5
10/26/2015 2015 10 26 148 46 68 57 25 5966.5
10/27/2015 2015 10 27 149 37 72 54.5 22.5 5989
10/28/2015 2015 10 28 150 34 59 46.5 14.5 6003.5
10/29/2015 2015 10 29 151 45 55 50 18 6021.5
10/30/2015 2015 10 30 152 39 61 50 18 6039.5
10/31/2015 2015 10 31 153 36 66 51 19 6058.5
11/1/2015 2015 11 1 154 34 68 51 19 6077.5
11/2/2015 2015 11 2 155 37 72 54.5 22.5 6100
11/3/2015 2015 11 3 156 46 64 55 23 6123
11/4/2015 2015 11 4 157 41 52 46.5 14.5 6137.5
11/5/2015 2015 11 5 158 34 50 42 10 6147.5
11/6/2015 2015 11 6 159 27 54 40.5 8.5 6156
11/7/2015 2015 11 7 160 23 52 37.5 5.5 6161.5
11/8/2015 2015 11 8 161 23 54 38.5 6.5 6168
11/9/2015 2015 11 9 162 27 61 44 12 6180
11/10/2015 2015 11 10 163 37 52 44.5 12.5 6192.5
11/11/2015 2015 11 11 164 28 50 39 7 6199.5
11/12/2015 2015 11 12 165 21 48 34.5 2.5 6202
11/13/2015 2015 11 13 166 19 50 34.5 2.5 6204.5
11/14/2015 2015 11 14 167 19 52 35.5 3.5 6208
11/15/2015 2015 11 15 168 21 54 37.5 5.5 6213.5
11/16/2015 2015 11 16 169 32 50 41 9 6222.5
11/17/2015 2015 11 17 170 32 50 41 9 6231.5
11/18/2015 2015 11 18 171 27 59 43 11 6242.5
11/19/2015 2015 11 19 172 25 55 40 8 6250.5
11/20/2015 2015 11 20 173 27 61 44 12 6262.5
11/21/2015 2015 11 21 174 21 46 33.5 1.5 6264
11/22/2015 2015 11 22 175 14 46 30 -2 6262
11/23/2015 2015 11 23 176 14 46 30 -2 6260
11/24/2015 2015 11 24 177 18 54 36 4 6264
11/25/2015 2015 11 25 178 34 61 47.5 15.5 6279.5
11/26/2015 2015 11 26 179 25 46 35.5 3.5 6283
11/27/2015 2015 11 27 180 21 41 31 -1 6282
11/28/2015 2015 11 28 181 21 37 29 -3 6279
11/29/2015 2015 11 29 182 18 36 27 -5 6274
11/30/2015 2015 11 30 183 12 39 25.5 -6.5 6267.5
12/1/2015 2015 12 1 184 9 39 24 -8 6259.5
12/2/2015 2015 12 2 185 10 41 25.5 -6.5 6253
12/3/2015 2015 12 3 186 12 43 27.5 -4.5 6248.5
12/4/2015 2015 12 4 187 19 41 30 -2 6246.5
12/5/2015 2015 12 5 188 14 50 32 0 6246.5
12/6/2015 2015 12 6 189 16 43 29.5 -2.5 6244
12/7/2015 2015 12 7 190 14 43 28.5 -3.5 6240.5
12/8/2015 2015 12 8 191 21 46 33.5 1.5 6242
12/9/2015 2015 12 9 192 21 43 32 0 6242
12/10/2015 2015 12 10 193 19 45 32 0 6242
12/11/2015 2015 12 11 194 32 37 34.5 2.5 6244.5
12/12/2015 2015 12 12 195 25 46 35.5 3.5 6248
12/13/2015 2015 12 13 196 16 41 28.5 -3.5 6244.5
12/14/2015 2015 12 14 197 23 37 30 -2 6242.5
12/15/2015 2015 12 15 198 23 39 31 -1 6241.5
12/16/2015 2015 12 16 199 12 36 24 -8 6233.5
12/17/2015 2015 12 17 200 14 36 25 -7 6226.5
12/18/2015 2015 12 18 201 14 36 25 -7 6219.5
12/19/2015 2015 12 19 202 14 37 25.5 -6.5 6213
12/20/2015 2015 12 20 203 19 43 31 -1 6212
12/21/2015 2015 12 21 204 21 46 33.5 1.5 6213.5
12/22/2015 2015 12 22 205 36 50 43 11 6224.5
12/23/2015 2015 12 23 206 18 43 30.5 -1.5 6223
12/24/2015 2015 12 24 207 12 34 23 -9 6214
12/25/2015 2015 12 25 208 23 36 29.5 -2.5 6211.5
12/26/2015 2015 12 26 209 12 34 23 -9 6202.5
12/27/2015 2015 12 27 210 5 32 18.5 -13.5 6189
12/28/2015 2015 12 28 211 10 30 20 -12 6177
12/29/2015 2015 12 29 212 10 32 21 -11 6166
12/30/2015 2015 12 30 213 14 36 25 -7 6159
12/31/2015 2015 12 31 214 12 32 22 -10 6149
1/1/2016 2016 1 1 215 3 32 17.5 -14.5 6134.5
1/2/2016 2016 1 2 216 21 34 27.5 -4.5 6130
1/3/2016 2016 1 3 217 18 34 26 -6 6124
1/4/2016 2016 1 4 218 21 37 29 -3 6121
1/5/2016 2016 1 5 219 30 37 33.5 1.5 6122.5
1/6/2016 2016 1 6 220 32 36 34 2 6124.5
1/7/2016 2016 1 7 221 30 41 35.5 3.5 6128
1/8/2016 2016 1 8 222 30 41 35.5 3.5 6131.5
1/9/2016 2016 1 9 223 27 43 35 3 6134.5
1/10/2016 2016 1 10 224 18 37 27.5 -4.5 6130
1/11/2016 2016 1 11 225 12 34 23 -9 6121
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
1/12/2016 2016 1 12 226 12 34 23 -9 6112
1/13/2016 2016 1 13 227 10 34 22 -10 6102
1/14/2016 2016 1 14 228 10 41 25.5 -6.5 6095.5
1/15/2016 2016 1 15 229 23 43 33 1 6096.5
1/16/2016 2016 1 16 230 16 43 29.5 -2.5 6094
1/17/2016 2016 1 17 231 18 50 34 2 6096
1/18/2016 2016 1 18 232 19 41 30 -2 6094
1/19/2016 2016 1 19 233 18 45 31.5 -0.5 6093.5
1/20/2016 2016 1 20 234 21 50 35.5 3.5 6097
1/21/2016 2016 1 21 235 12 43 27.5 -4.5 6092.5
1/22/2016 2016 1 22 236 18 43 30.5 -1.5 6091
1/23/2016 2016 1 23 237 16 39 27.5 -4.5 6086.5
1/24/2016 2016 1 24 238 21 46 33.5 1.5 6088
1/25/2016 2016 1 25 239 19 45 32 0 6088
1/26/2016 2016 1 26 240 14 43 28.5 -3.5 6084.5
1/27/2016 2016 1 27 241 12 45 28.5 -3.5 6081
1/28/2016 2016 1 28 242 14 46 30 -2 6079
1/29/2016 2016 1 29 243 18 46 32 0 6079
1/30/2016 2016 1 30 244 27 63 45 13 6092
1/31/2016 2016 1 31 245 30 36 33 1 6093
2/1/2016 2016 2 1 246 25 34 29.5 -2.5 6090.5
2/2/2016 2016 2 2 247 1 34 17.5 -14.5 6076
2/3/2016 2016 2 3 248 -2 30 14 -18 6058
2/4/2016 2016 2 4 249 0 27 13.5 -18.5 6039.5
2/5/2016 2016 2 5 250 -2 23 10.5 -21.5 6018
2/6/2016 2016 2 6 251 14 23 18.5 -13.5 6004.5
2/7/2016 2016 2 7 252 12 32 22 -10 5994.5
2/8/2016 2016 2 8 253 9 41 25 -7 5987.5
2/9/2016 2016 2 9 254 14 43 28.5 -3.5 5984
2/10/2016 2016 2 10 255 19 46 32.5 0.5 5984.5
2/11/2016 2016 2 11 256 23 48 35.5 3.5 5988
2/12/2016 2016 2 12 257 27 52 39.5 7.5 5995.5
2/13/2016 2016 2 13 258 28 52 40 8 6003.5
2/14/2016 2016 2 14 259 28 55 41.5 9.5 6013
2/15/2016 2016 2 15 260 30 61 45.5 13.5 6026.5
2/16/2016 2016 2 16 261 30 59 44.5 12.5 6039
2/17/2016 2016 2 17 262 28 55 41.5 9.5 6048.5
2/18/2016 2016 2 18 263 30 66 48 16 6064.5
2/19/2016 2016 2 19 264 23 57 40 8 6072.5
2/20/2016 2016 2 20 265 27 63 45 13 6085.5
2/21/2016 2016 2 21 266 27 61 44 12 6097.5
2/22/2016 2016 2 22 267 27 55 41 9 6106.5
2/23/2016 2016 2 23 268 23 50 36.5 4.5 6111
2/24/2016 2016 2 24 269 18 52 35 3 6114
2/25/2016 2016 2 25 270 21 57 39 7 6121
2/26/2016 2016 2 26 271 21 61 41 9 6130
2/27/2016 2016 2 27 272 25 63 44 12 6142
2/28/2016 2016 2 28 273 34 64 49 17 6159
2/29/2016 2016 2 29 274 28 68 48 16 6175
3/1/2016 2016 3 1 275 28 64 46 14 6189
3/2/2016 2016 3 2 276 30 70 50 18 6207
3/3/2016 2016 3 3 277 27 66 46.5 14.5 6221.5
3/4/2016 2016 3 4 278 32 68 50 18 6239.5
3/5/2016 2016 3 5 279 36 68 52 20 6259.5
3/6/2016 2016 3 6 280 41 64 52.5 20.5 6280
3/7/2016 2016 3 7 281 37 55 46 14 6294
3/8/2016 2016 3 8 282 32 57 44.5 12.5 6306.5
3/9/2016 2016 3 9 283 32 61 46.5 14.5 6321
3/10/2016 2016 3 10 284 30 64 47 15 6336
3/11/2016 2016 3 11 285 32 63 47.5 15.5 6351.5
3/12/2016 2016 3 12 286 32 63 47.5 15.5 6367
3/13/2016 2016 3 13 287 32 64 48 16 6383
3/14/2016 2016 3 14 288 43 68 55.5 23.5 6406.5
3/15/2016 2016 3 15 289 27 57 42 10 6416.5
3/16/2016 2016 3 16 290 32 61 46.5 14.5 6431
3/17/2016 2016 3 17 291 23 68 45.5 13.5 6444.5
3/18/2016 2016 3 18 292 28 64 46 14 6458.5
3/19/2016 2016 3 19 293 27 64 45.5 13.5 6472
3/20/2016 2016 3 20 294 28 70 49 17 6489
3/21/2016 2016 3 21 295 32 75 53.5 21.5 6510.5
3/22/2016 2016 3 22 296 37 64 50.5 18.5 6529
3/23/2016 2016 3 23 297 32 55 43.5 11.5 6540.5
3/24/2016 2016 3 24 298 25 61 43 11 6551.5
3/25/2016 2016 3 25 299 28 61 44.5 12.5 6564
3/26/2016 2016 3 26 300 32 54 43 11 6575
3/27/2016 2016 3 27 301 25 63 44 12 6587
3/28/2016 2016 3 28 302 37 63 50 18 6605
3/29/2016 2016 3 29 303 41 54 47.5 15.5 6620.5
3/30/2016 2016 3 30 304 28 57 42.5 10.5 6631
3/31/2016 2016 3 31 305 27 59 43 11 6642
4/1/2016 2016 4 1 306 32 59 45.5 13.5 6655.5
4/2/2016 2016 4 2 307 28 64 46 14 6669.5
4/3/2016 2016 4 3 308 32 73 52.5 20.5 6690
4/4/2016 2016 4 4 309 36 79 57.5 25.5 6715.5
4/5/2016 2016 4 5 310 37 70 53.5 21.5 6737
4/6/2016 2016 4 6 311 28 72 50 18 6755
4/7/2016 2016 4 7 312 32 75 53.5 21.5 6776.5
4/8/2016 2016 4 8 313 41 73 57 25 6801.5
4/9/2016 2016 4 9 314 41 72 56.5 24.5 6826
4/10/2016 2016 4 10 315 45 72 58.5 26.5 6852.5
4/11/2016 2016 4 11 316 37 72 54.5 22.5 6875
4/12/2016 2016 4 12 317 36 73 54.5 22.5 6897.5
4/13/2016 2016 4 13 318 37 77 57 25 6922.5
4/14/2016 2016 4 14 319 45 73 59 27 6949.5
4/15/2016 2016 4 15 320 37 52 44.5 12.5 6962
4/16/2016 2016 4 16 321 45 63 54 22 6984
4/17/2016 2016 4 17 322 37 57 47 15 6999
4/18/2016 2016 4 18 323 32 59 45.5 13.5 7012.5
4/19/2016 2016 4 19 324 34 68 51 19 7031.5
4/20/2016 2016 4 20 325 37 75 56 24 7055.5
4/21/2016 2016 4 21 326 41 81 61 29 7084.5
4/22/2016 2016 4 22 327 41 82 61.5 29.5 7114
4/23/2016 2016 4 23 328 43 72 57.5 25.5 7139.5
4/24/2016 2016 4 24 329 37 72 54.5 22.5 7162
4/25/2016 2016 4 25 330 45 63 54 22 7184
4/26/2016 2016 4 26 331 41 55 48 16 7200
4/27/2016 2016 4 27 332 34 63 48.5 16.5 7216.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
4/28/2016 2016 4 28 333 41 54 47.5 15.5 7232
4/29/2016 2016 4 29 334 45 63 54 22 7254
4/30/2016 2016 4 30 335 37 61 49 17 7271
5/1/2016 2016 5 1 336 41 61 51 19 7290
5/2/2016 2016 5 2 337 48 68 58 26 7316
5/3/2016 2016 5 3 338 39 75 57 25 7341
5/4/2016 2016 5 4 339 41 82 61.5 29.5 7370.5
5/5/2016 2016 5 5 340 46 86 66 34 7404.5
5/6/2016 2016 5 6 341 54 77 65.5 33.5 7438
5/7/2016 2016 5 7 342 43 66 54.5 22.5 7460.5
5/8/2016 2016 5 8 343 37 68 52.5 20.5 7481
5/9/2016 2016 5 9 344 54 81 67.5 35.5 7516.5
5/10/2016 2016 5 10 345 52 66 59 27 7543.5
5/11/2016 2016 5 11 346 45 72 58.5 26.5 7570
5/12/2016 2016 5 12 347 36 79 57.5 25.5 7595.5
5/13/2016 2016 5 13 348 41 88 64.5 32.5 7628
5/14/2016 2016 5 14 349 46 88 67 35 7663
5/15/2016 2016 5 15 350 54 81 67.5 35.5 7698.5
5/16/2016 2016 5 16 351 43 68 55.5 23.5 7722
5/17/2016 2016 5 17 352 50 70 60 28 7750
5/18/2016 2016 5 18 353 48 73 60.5 28.5 7778.5
5/19/2016 2016 5 19 354 46 81 63.5 31.5 7810
5/20/2016 2016 5 20 355 64 79 71.5 39.5 7849.5
5/21/2016 2016 5 21 356 59 79 69 37 7886.5
5/22/2016 2016 5 22 357 54 73 63.5 31.5 7918
5/23/2016 2016 5 23 358 41 77 59 27 7945
5/24/2016 2016 5 24 359 45 77 61 29 7974
5/25/2016 2016 5 25 360 43 79 61 29 8003
5/26/2016 2016 5 26 361 46 73 59.5 27.5 8030.5
5/27/2016 2016 5 27 362 37 77 57 25 8055.5
5/28/2016 2016 5 28 363 43 79 61 29 8084.5
5/29/2016 2016 5 29 364 45 88 66.5 34.5 8119
5/30/2016 2016 5 30 365 48 86 67 35 8154
5/31/2016 2016 5 31 366 46 88 67 35 8189
6/1/2016 2016 6 1 1 46 90 68 36 36
6/2/2016 2016 6 2 2 46 95 70.5 38.5 74.5
6/3/2016 2016 6 3 3 52 95 73.5 41.5 116
6/4/2016 2016 6 4 4 54 95 74.5 42.5 158.5
6/5/2016 2016 6 5 5 54 99 76.5 44.5 203
6/6/2016 2016 6 6 6 59 100 79.5 47.5 250.5
6/7/2016 2016 6 7 7 59 97 78 46 296.5
6/8/2016 2016 6 8 8 63 99 81 49 345.5
6/9/2016 2016 6 9 9 59 100 79.5 47.5 393
6/10/2016 2016 6 10 10 59 100 79.5 47.5 440.5
6/11/2016 2016 6 11 11 66 91 78.5 46.5 487
6/12/2016 2016 6 12 12 59 91 75 43 530
6/13/2016 2016 6 13 13 55 82 68.5 36.5 566.5
6/14/2016 2016 6 14 14 46 90 68 36 602.5
6/15/2016 2016 6 15 15 55 91 73 41 643.5
6/16/2016 2016 6 16 16 68 91 79.5 47.5 691
6/17/2016 2016 6 17 17 55 95 75 43 734
6/18/2016 2016 6 18 18 52 99 75.5 43.5 777.5
6/19/2016 2016 6 19 19 66 102 84 52 829.5
6/20/2016 2016 6 20 20 57 106 81.5 49.5 879
6/21/2016 2016 6 21 21 63 106 84.5 52.5 931.5
6/22/2016 2016 6 22 22 70 104 87 55 986.5
6/23/2016 2016 6 23 23 72 102 87 55 1041.5
6/24/2016 2016 6 24 24 61 100 80.5 48.5 1090
6/25/2016 2016 6 25 25 59 99 79 47 1137
6/26/2016 2016 6 26 26 55 99 77 45 1182
6/27/2016 2016 6 27 27 59 97 78 46 1228
10/3/2016 2016 10 3 125 45 61 53 21 1249
10/4/2016 2016 10 4 126 32 64 48 16 1265
10/5/2016 2016 10 5 127 36 64 50 18 1283
10/6/2016 2016 10 6 128 36 63 49.5 17.5 1300.5
10/7/2016 2016 10 7 129 32 68 50 18 1318.5
10/8/2016 2016 10 8 130 34 70 52 20 1338.5
10/9/2016 2016 10 9 131 43 77 60 28 1366.5
10/10/2016 2016 10 10 132 43 79 61 29 1395.5
10/11/2016 2016 10 11 133 48 73 60.5 28.5 1424
10/12/2016 2016 10 12 134 41 73 57 25 1449
10/13/2016 2016 10 13 135 41 79 60 28 1477
10/14/2016 2016 10 14 136 48 81 64.5 32.5 1509.5
10/15/2016 2016 10 15 137 63 82 72.5 40.5 1550
10/16/2016 2016 10 16 138 68 81 74.5 42.5 1592.5
10/17/2016 2016 10 17 139 50 77 63.5 31.5 1624
10/18/2016 2016 10 18 140 37 73 55 23 1647
10/19/2016 2016 10 19 141 36 63 49.5 17.5 1664.5
10/20/2016 2016 10 20 142 30 64 47 15 1679.5
10/21/2016 2016 10 21 143 30 68 49 17 1696.5
10/22/2016 2016 10 22 144 32 77 54.5 22.5 1719
10/23/2016 2016 10 23 145 34 77 55.5 23.5 1742.5
10/24/2016 2016 10 24 146 43 75 59 27 1769.5
10/25/2016 2016 10 25 147 48 68 58 26 1795.5
10/26/2016 2016 10 26 148 43 70 56.5 24.5 1820
10/27/2016 2016 10 27 149 43 68 55.5 23.5 1843.5
10/28/2016 2016 10 28 150 50 68 59 27 1870.5
10/29/2016 2016 10 29 151 55 77 66 34 1904.5
10/30/2016 2016 10 30 152 54 73 63.5 31.5 1936
10/31/2016 2016 10 31 153 50 73 61.5 29.5 1965.5
11/1/2016 2016 11 1 154 48 68 58 26 1991.5
11/2/2016 2016 11 2 155 34 64 49 17 2008.5
11/3/2016 2016 11 3 156 32 66 49 17 2025.5
11/4/2016 2016 11 4 157 41 63 52 20 2045.5
11/5/2016 2016 11 5 158 43 66 54.5 22.5 2068
11/6/2016 2016 11 6 159 36 66 51 19 2087
11/7/2016 2016 11 7 160 36 68 52 20 2107
11/8/2016 2016 11 8 161 34 68 51 19 2126
11/9/2016 2016 11 9 162 32 68 50 18 2144
11/10/2016 2016 11 10 163 30 66 48 16 2160
11/11/2016 2016 11 11 164 30 66 48 16 2176
11/12/2016 2016 11 12 165 30 64 47 15 2191
11/13/2016 2016 11 13 166 28 66 47 15 2206
11/14/2016 2016 11 14 167 30 66 48 16 2222
11/15/2016 2016 11 15 168 28 63 45.5 13.5 2235.5
11/16/2016 2016 11 16 169 37 70 53.5 21.5 2257
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
11/17/2016 2016 11 17 170 25 59 42 10 2267
11/18/2016 2016 11 18 171 18 46 32 0 2267
11/19/2016 2016 11 19 172 18 50 34 2 2269
11/20/2016 2016 11 20 173 34 52 43 11 2280
11/21/2016 2016 11 21 174 41 46 43.5 11.5 2291.5
11/22/2016 2016 11 22 175 32 54 43 11 2302.5
11/23/2016 2016 11 23 176 28 54 41 9 2311.5
11/24/2016 2016 11 24 177 27 46 36.5 4.5 2316
11/25/2016 2016 11 25 178 19 45 32 0 2316
11/26/2016 2016 11 26 179 21 46 33.5 1.5 2317.5
11/27/2016 2016 11 27 180 28 52 40 8 2325.5
11/28/2016 2016 11 28 181 27 46 36.5 4.5 2330
11/29/2016 2016 11 29 182 23 45 34 2 2332
11/30/2016 2016 11 30 183 18 41 29.5 -2.5 2329.5
12/1/2016 2016 12 1 184 25 43 34 2 2331.5
12/2/2016 2016 12 2 185 23 43 33 1 2332.5
12/3/2016 2016 12 3 186 14 41 27.5 -4.5 2328
12/4/2016 2016 12 4 187 14 43 28.5 -3.5 2324.5
12/5/2016 2016 12 5 188 18 50 34 2 2326.5
12/6/2016 2016 12 6 189 12 37 24.5 -7.5 2319
12/7/2016 2016 12 7 190 16 37 26.5 -5.5 2313.5
12/8/2016 2016 12 8 191 12 36 24 -8 2305.5
12/9/2016 2016 12 9 192 14 37 25.5 -6.5 2299
12/10/2016 2016 12 10 193 16 37 26.5 -5.5 2293.5
12/11/2016 2016 12 11 194 25 54 39.5 7.5 2301
12/12/2016 2016 12 12 195 23 54 38.5 6.5 2307.5
12/13/2016 2016 12 13 196 19 46 32.5 0.5 2308
12/14/2016 2016 12 14 197 23 54 38.5 6.5 2314.5
12/15/2016 2016 12 15 198 32 59 45.5 13.5 2328
12/16/2016 2016 12 16 199 34 59 46.5 14.5 2342.5
12/17/2016 2016 12 17 200 14 36 25 -7 2335.5
12/18/2016 2016 12 18 201 7 34 20.5 -11.5 2324
12/19/2016 2016 12 19 202 5 34 19.5 -12.5 2311.5
12/20/2016 2016 12 20 203 10 37 23.5 -8.5 2303
12/21/2016 2016 12 21 204 14 34 24 -8 2295
12/22/2016 2016 12 22 205 28 32 30 -2 2293
12/23/2016 2016 12 23 206 28 36 32 0 2293
12/24/2016 2016 12 24 207 32 46 39 7 2300
12/25/2016 2016 12 25 208 32 43 37.5 5.5 2305.5
12/26/2016 2016 12 26 209 14 36 25 -7 2298.5
12/27/2016 2016 12 27 210 12 36 24 -8 2290.5
12/28/2016 2016 12 28 211 12 39 25.5 -6.5 2284
12/29/2016 2016 12 29 212 12 43 27.5 -4.5 2279.5
12/30/2016 2016 12 30 213 12 39 25.5 -6.5 2273
12/31/2016 2016 12 31 214 21 43 32 0 2273
1/1/2017 2017 1 1 215 19 41 30 -2 2271
1/2/2017 2017 1 2 216 41 46 43.5 11.5 2282.5
1/3/2017 2017 1 3 217 28 46 37 5 2287.5
1/4/2017 2017 1 4 218 30 52 41 9 2296.5
1/5/2017 2017 1 5 219 19 46 32.5 0.5 2297
1/6/2017 2017 1 6 220 0 27 13.5 -18.5 2278.5
1/7/2017 2017 1 7 221 1 23 12 -20 2258.5
1/8/2017 2017 1 8 222 21 28 24.5 -7.5 2251
1/9/2017 2017 1 9 223 19 52 35.5 3.5 2254.5
1/10/2017 2017 1 10 224 30 52 41 9 2263.5
1/11/2017 2017 1 11 225 32 55 43.5 11.5 2275
1/12/2017 2017 1 12 226 32 41 36.5 4.5 2279.5
1/13/2017 2017 1 13 227 36 43 39.5 7.5 2287
1/14/2017 2017 1 14 228 36 45 40.5 8.5 2295.5
1/15/2017 2017 1 15 229 36 41 38.5 6.5 2302
1/16/2017 2017 1 16 230 30 45 37.5 5.5 2307.5
1/17/2017 2017 1 17 231 21 43 32 0 2307.5
1/18/2017 2017 1 18 232 19 43 31 -1 2306.5
1/19/2017 2017 1 19 233 23 34 28.5 -3.5 2303
1/20/2017 2017 1 20 234 30 41 35.5 3.5 2306.5
1/21/2017 2017 1 21 235 30 46 38 6 2312.5
1/22/2017 2017 1 22 236 23 41 32 0 2312.5
1/23/2017 2017 1 23 237 30 46 38 6 2318.5
1/24/2017 2017 1 24 238 23 43 33 1 2319.5
1/25/2017 2017 1 25 239 18 37 27.5 -4.5 2315
1/26/2017 2017 1 26 240 14 36 25 -7 2308
1/27/2017 2017 1 27 241 16 36 26 -6 2302
1/28/2017 2017 1 28 242 10 37 23.5 -8.5 2293.5
1/29/2017 2017 1 29 243 14 45 29.5 -2.5 2291
1/30/2017 2017 1 30 244 18 46 32 0 2291
1/31/2017 2017 1 31 245 18 46 32 0 2291
2/1/2017 2017 2 1 246 19 54 36.5 4.5 2295.5
2/2/2017 2017 2 2 247 25 57 41 9 2304.5
2/3/2017 2017 2 3 248 25 54 39.5 7.5 2312
2/4/2017 2017 2 4 249 30 59 44.5 12.5 2324.5
2/5/2017 2017 2 5 250 27 57 42 10 2334.5
2/6/2017 2017 2 6 251 37 59 48 16 2350.5
2/7/2017 2017 2 7 252 39 61 50 18 2368.5
2/8/2017 2017 2 8 253 32 64 48 16 2384.5
2/9/2017 2017 2 9 254 34 70 52 20 2404.5
2/10/2017 2017 2 10 255 54 72 63 31 2435.5
2/11/2017 2017 2 11 256 45 59 52 20 2455.5
2/12/2017 2017 2 12 257 32 50 41 9 2464.5
2/13/2017 2017 2 13 258 32 61 46.5 14.5 2479
2/14/2017 2017 2 14 259 23 59 41 9 2488
2/15/2017 2017 2 15 260 25 57 41 9 2497
2/16/2017 2017 2 16 261 19 55 37 5 2502
2/17/2017 2017 2 17 262 37 55 46 14 2516
2/18/2017 2017 2 18 263 39 46 42.5 10.5 2526.5
2/19/2017 2017 2 19 264 32 50 41 9 2535.5
2/20/2017 2017 2 20 265 27 57 42 10 2545.5
2/21/2017 2017 2 21 266 34 64 49 17 2562.5
2/22/2017 2017 2 22 267 37 64 50.5 18.5 2581
2/23/2017 2017 2 23 268 28 45 36.5 4.5 2585.5
2/24/2017 2017 2 24 269 19 41 30 -2 2583.5
2/25/2017 2017 2 25 270 10 43 26.5 -5.5 2578
2/26/2017 2017 2 26 271 14 46 30 -2 2576
2/27/2017 2017 2 27 272 37 52 44.5 12.5 2588.5
2/28/2017 2017 2 28 273 28 46 37 5 2593.5
3/1/2017 2017 3 1 274 14 46 30 -2 2591.5
3/2/2017 2017 3 2 275 14 54 34 2 2593.5
3/3/2017 2017 3 3 276 16 57 36.5 4.5 2598
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
3/4/2017 2017 3 4 277 27 64 45.5 13.5 2611.5
3/5/2017 2017 3 5 278 45 64 54.5 22.5 2634
3/6/2017 2017 3 6 279 23 43 33 1 2635
3/7/2017 2017 3 7 280 18 55 36.5 4.5 2639.5
3/8/2017 2017 3 8 281 21 64 42.5 10.5 2650
3/9/2017 2017 3 9 282 25 70 47.5 15.5 2665.5
3/10/2017 2017 3 10 283 30 72 51 19 2684.5
3/11/2017 2017 3 11 284 34 70 52 20 2704.5
3/12/2017 2017 3 12 285 30 72 51 19 2723.5
3/13/2017 2017 3 13 286 32 73 52.5 20.5 2744
3/14/2017 2017 3 14 287 32 77 54.5 22.5 2766.5
3/15/2017 2017 3 15 288 32 79 55.5 23.5 2790
3/16/2017 2017 3 16 289 34 79 56.5 24.5 2814.5
3/17/2017 2017 3 17 290 37 79 58 26 2840.5
3/18/2017 2017 3 18 291 36 82 59 27 2867.5
3/19/2017 2017 3 19 292 41 81 61 29 2896.5
3/20/2017 2017 3 20 293 46 79 62.5 30.5 2927
3/21/2017 2017 3 21 294 45 77 61 29 2956
3/22/2017 2017 3 22 295 50 73 61.5 29.5 2985.5
3/23/2017 2017 3 23 296 43 52 47.5 15.5 3001
3/24/2017 2017 3 24 297 36 63 49.5 17.5 3018.5
3/25/2017 2017 3 25 298 34 64 49 17 3035.5
3/26/2017 2017 3 26 299 32 61 46.5 14.5 3050
3/27/2017 2017 3 27 300 39 64 51.5 19.5 3069.5
3/28/2017 2017 3 28 301 39 63 51 19 3088.5
3/29/2017 2017 3 29 302 32 66 49 17 3105.5
3/30/2017 2017 3 30 303 34 70 52 20 3125.5
3/31/2017 2017 3 31 304 41 61 51 19 3144.5
4/1/2017 2017 4 1 305 36 61 48.5 16.5 3161
4/2/2017 2017 4 2 306 37 64 50.5 18.5 3179.5
4/3/2017 2017 4 3 307 36 55 45.5 13.5 3193
4/4/2017 2017 4 4 308 36 54 45 13 3206
4/5/2017 2017 4 5 309 27 61 44 12 3218
4/6/2017 2017 4 6 310 30 72 51 19 3237
4/7/2017 2017 4 7 311 45 72 58.5 26.5 3263.5
4/8/2017 2017 4 8 312 52 70 61 29 3292.5
4/9/2017 2017 4 9 313 37 55 46 14 3306.5
4/10/2017 2017 4 10 314 25 64 44.5 12.5 3319
4/11/2017 2017 4 11 315 32 70 51 19 3338
4/12/2017 2017 4 12 316 36 75 55.5 23.5 3361.5
4/13/2017 2017 4 13 317 36 79 57.5 25.5 3387
4/14/2017 2017 4 14 318 55 77 66 34 3421
4/15/2017 2017 4 15 319 39 72 55.5 23.5 3444.5
4/16/2017 2017 4 16 320 36 77 56.5 24.5 3469
4/17/2017 2017 4 17 321 43 81 62 30 3499
4/18/2017 2017 4 18 322 59 81 70 38 3537
4/19/2017 2017 4 19 323 43 72 57.5 25.5 3562.5
4/20/2017 2017 4 20 324 37 73 55 23 3585.5
4/21/2017 2017 4 21 325 41 64 52.5 20.5 3606
4/22/2017 2017 4 22 326 34 68 51 19 3625
4/23/2017 2017 4 23 327 37 79 58 26 3651
4/24/2017 2017 4 24 328 41 73 57 25 3676
4/25/2017 2017 4 25 329 46 63 54.5 22.5 3698.5
4/26/2017 2017 4 26 330 32 68 50 18 3716.5
4/27/2017 2017 4 27 331 39 61 50 18 3734.5
4/28/2017 2017 4 28 332 32 54 43 11 3745.5
4/29/2017 2017 4 29 333 39 61 50 18 3763.5
4/30/2017 2017 4 30 334 30 70 50 18 3781.5
5/1/2017 2017 5 1 335 39 75 57 25 3806.5
5/2/2017 2017 5 2 336 37 77 57 25 3831.5
5/3/2017 2017 5 3 337 41 77 59 27 3858.5
5/4/2017 2017 5 4 338 36 82 59 27 3885.5
5/5/2017 2017 5 5 339 41 91 66 34 3919.5
5/6/2017 2017 5 6 340 52 86 69 37 3956.5
5/7/2017 2017 5 7 341 54 81 67.5 35.5 3992
5/8/2017 2017 5 8 342 54 79 66.5 34.5 4026.5
5/9/2017 2017 5 9 343 50 72 61 29 4055.5
5/10/2017 2017 5 10 344 50 64 57 25 4080.5
5/11/2017 2017 5 11 345 43 81 62 30 4110.5
5/12/2017 2017 5 12 346 43 86 64.5 32.5 4143
5/13/2017 2017 5 13 347 63 82 72.5 40.5 4183.5
5/14/2017 2017 5 14 348 41 81 61 29 4212.5
5/15/2017 2017 5 15 349 46 79 62.5 30.5 4243
5/16/2017 2017 5 16 350 45 72 58.5 26.5 4269.5
5/17/2017 2017 5 17 351 43 61 52 20 4289.5
5/18/2017 2017 5 18 352 34 61 47.5 15.5 4305
5/19/2017 2017 5 19 353 41 63 52 20 4325
5/20/2017 2017 5 20 354 39 72 55.5 23.5 4348.5
5/21/2017 2017 5 21 355 41 75 58 26 4374.5
5/22/2017 2017 5 22 356 36 81 58.5 26.5 4401
5/23/2017 2017 5 23 357 48 81 64.5 32.5 4433.5
5/24/2017 2017 5 24 358 45 95 70 38 4471.5
5/25/2017 2017 5 25 359 61 82 71.5 39.5 4511
5/26/2017 2017 5 26 360 52 86 69 37 4548
5/27/2017 2017 5 27 361 54 81 67.5 35.5 4583.5
5/28/2017 2017 5 28 362 52 81 66.5 34.5 4618
5/29/2017 2017 5 29 363 45 86 65.5 33.5 4651.5
5/30/2017 2017 5 30 364 45 90 67.5 35.5 4687
5/31/2017 2017 5 31 365 54 91 72.5 40.5 4727.5
6/1/2017 2017 6 1 1 54 84 69 37 37
6/2/2017 2017 6 2 2 50 90 70 38 75
6/3/2017 2017 6 3 3 52 93 72.5 40.5 115.5
6/4/2017 2017 6 4 4 54 97 75.5 43.5 159
6/5/2017 2017 6 5 5 59 97 78 46 205
6/6/2017 2017 6 6 6 59 97 78 46 251
6/7/2017 2017 6 7 7 59 99 79 47 298
6/8/2017 2017 6 8 8 55 95 75 43 341
6/9/2017 2017 6 9 9 66 95 80.5 48.5 389.5
6/10/2017 2017 6 10 10 73 95 84 52 441.5
6/11/2017 2017 6 11 11 73 91 82 50 491.5
6/12/2017 2017 6 12 12 59 79 69 37 528.5
6/13/2017 2017 6 13 13 46 82 64 32 560.5
6/14/2017 2017 6 14 14 52 90 71 39 599.5
6/15/2017 2017 6 15 15 52 95 73.5 41.5 641
6/16/2017 2017 6 16 16 54 99 76.5 44.5 685.5
6/17/2017 2017 6 17 17 59 100 79.5 47.5 733
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
6/18/2017 2017 6 18 18 63 99 81 49 782
6/19/2017 2017 6 19 19 59 99 79 47 829
6/20/2017 2017 6 20 20 61 104 82.5 50.5 879.5
6/21/2017 2017 6 21 21 63 104 83.5 51.5 931
6/22/2017 2017 6 22 22 63 104 83.5 51.5 982.5
6/23/2017 2017 6 23 23 63 99 81 49 1031.5
6/24/2017 2017 6 24 24 55 99 77 45 1076.5
6/25/2017 2017 6 25 25 55 99 77 45 1121.5
6/26/2017 2017 6 26 26 55 100 77.5 45.5 1167
6/27/2017 2017 6 27 27 61 100 80.5 48.5 1215.5
6/28/2017 2017 6 28 28 55 100 77.5 45.5 1261
6/29/2017 2017 6 29 29 66 97 81.5 49.5 1310.5
6/30/2017 2017 6 30 30 55 95 75 43 1353.5
7/1/2017 2017 7 1 31 54 99 76.5 44.5 1398
7/2/2017 2017 7 2 32 57 97 77 45 1443
7/3/2017 2017 7 3 33 54 100 77 45 1488
7/4/2017 2017 7 4 34 59 102 80.5 48.5 1536.5
7/5/2017 2017 7 5 35 64 106 85 53 1589.5
7/6/2017 2017 7 6 36 70 104 87 55 1644.5
7/7/2017 2017 7 7 37 68 106 87 55 1699.5
7/8/2017 2017 7 8 38 64 104 84 52 1751.5
7/9/2017 2017 7 9 39 72 104 88 56 1807.5
7/10/2017 2017 7 10 40 70 99 84.5 52.5 1860
7/11/2017 2017 7 11 41 66 97 81.5 49.5 1909.5
7/12/2017 2017 7 12 42 64 90 77 45 1954.5
7/13/2017 2017 7 13 43 61 95 78 46 2000.5
7/14/2017 2017 7 14 44 70 100 85 53 2053.5
7/15/2017 2017 7 15 45 63 102 82.5 50.5 2104
7/16/2017 2017 7 16 46 64 102 83 51 2155
7/17/2017 2017 7 17 47 73 99 86 54 2209
7/18/2017 2017 7 18 48 72 102 87 55 2264
7/19/2017 2017 7 19 49 72 99 85.5 53.5 2317.5
7/20/2017 2017 7 20 50 64 97 80.5 48.5 2366
7/21/2017 2017 7 21 51 66 95 80.5 48.5 2414.5
7/22/2017 2017 7 22 52 63 99 81 49 2463.5
7/23/2017 2017 7 23 53 64 99 81.5 49.5 2513
7/24/2017 2017 7 24 54 73 95 84 52 2565
7/25/2017 2017 7 25 55 64 79 71.5 39.5 2604.5
7/26/2017 2017 7 26 56 63 90 76.5 44.5 2649
7/27/2017 2017 7 27 57 64 97 80.5 48.5 2697.5
7/28/2017 2017 7 28 58 66 88 77 45 2742.5
7/29/2017 2017 7 29 59 61 95 78 46 2788.5
7/30/2017 2017 7 30 60 64 97 80.5 48.5 2837
7/31/2017 2017 7 31 61 63 97 80 48 2885
8/1/2017 2017 8 1 62 63 99 81 49 2934
8/2/2017 2017 8 2 63 63 99 81 49 2983
8/3/2017 2017 8 3 64 64 97 80.5 48.5 3031.5
8/4/2017 2017 8 4 65 68 97 82.5 50.5 3082
8/5/2017 2017 8 5 66 68 91 79.5 47.5 3129.5
8/6/2017 2017 8 6 67 61 88 74.5 42.5 3172
8/7/2017 2017 8 7 68 61 88 74.5 42.5 3214.5
8/8/2017 2017 8 8 69 61 90 75.5 43.5 3258
8/9/2017 2017 8 9 70 63 93 78 46 3304
8/10/2017 2017 8 10 71 64 93 78.5 46.5 3350.5
8/11/2017 2017 8 11 72 63 91 77 45 3395.5
8/12/2017 2017 8 12 73 61 88 74.5 42.5 3438
8/13/2017 2017 8 13 74 57 93 75 43 3481
8/14/2017 2017 8 14 75 63 95 79 47 3528
8/15/2017 2017 8 15 76 61 86 73.5 41.5 3569.5
8/16/2017 2017 8 16 77 54 90 72 40 3609.5
8/17/2017 2017 8 17 78 55 95 75 43 3652.5
8/18/2017 2017 8 18 79 55 95 75 43 3695.5
8/19/2017 2017 8 19 80 64 97 80.5 48.5 3744
8/20/2017 2017 8 20 81 59 95 77 45 3789
8/21/2017 2017 8 21 82 64 95 79.5 47.5 3836.5
8/22/2017 2017 8 22 83 63 90 76.5 44.5 3881
8/23/2017 2017 8 23 84 59 93 76 44 3925
8/24/2017 2017 8 24 85 61 91 76 44 3969
8/25/2017 2017 8 25 86 55 95 75 43 4012
8/26/2017 2017 8 26 87 54 99 76.5 44.5 4056.5
8/27/2017 2017 8 27 88 59 99 79 47 4103.5
8/28/2017 2017 8 28 89 61 99 80 48 4151.5
8/29/2017 2017 8 29 90 57 99 78 46 4197.5
8/30/2017 2017 8 30 91 61 99 80 48 4245.5
8/31/2017 2017 8 31 92 64 88 76 44 4289.5
9/1/2017 2017 9 1 93 55 91 73 41 4330.5
9/2/2017 2017 9 2 94 54 95 74.5 42.5 4373
9/3/2017 2017 9 3 95 54 99 76.5 44.5 4417.5
9/4/2017 2017 9 4 96 55 100 77.5 45.5 4463
9/5/2017 2017 9 5 97 59 99 79 47 4510
9/6/2017 2017 9 6 98 61 95 78 46 4556
9/7/2017 2017 9 7 99 61 91 76 44 4600
9/8/2017 2017 9 8 100 57 91 74 42 4642
9/9/2017 2017 9 9 101 63 82 72.5 40.5 4682.5
9/10/2017 2017 9 10 102 55 88 71.5 39.5 4722
9/11/2017 2017 9 11 103 55 93 74 42 4764
9/12/2017 2017 9 12 104 59 95 77 45 4809
9/13/2017 2017 9 13 105 54 91 72.5 40.5 4849.5
9/14/2017 2017 9 14 106 52 79 65.5 33.5 4883
9/15/2017 2017 9 15 107 46 68 57 25 4908
9/16/2017 2017 9 16 108 45 72 58.5 26.5 4934.5
9/17/2017 2017 9 17 109 50 77 63.5 31.5 4966
9/18/2017 2017 9 18 110 50 82 66 34 5000
9/19/2017 2017 9 19 111 68 84 76 44 5044
9/20/2017 2017 9 20 112 52 84 68 36 5080
9/21/2017 2017 9 21 113 66 84 75 43 5123
9/22/2017 2017 9 22 114 46 77 61.5 29.5 5152.5
9/23/2017 2017 9 23 115 39 72 55.5 23.5 5176
9/24/2017 2017 9 24 116 45 64 54.5 22.5 5198.5
9/25/2017 2017 9 25 117 34 64 49 17 5215.5
9/26/2017 2017 9 26 118 37 70 53.5 21.5 5237
9/27/2017 2017 9 27 119 37 64 50.5 18.5 5255.5
9/28/2017 2017 9 28 120 50 63 56.5 24.5 5280
9/29/2017 2017 9 29 121 45 72 58.5 26.5 5306.5
9/30/2017 2017 9 30 122 48 72 60 28 5334.5
10/1/2017 2017 10 1 123 45 77 61 29 5363.5
10/2/2017 2017 10 2 124 37 54 45.5 13.5 5377
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
10/3/2017 2017 10 3 125 36 59 47.5 15.5 5392.5
10/4/2017 2017 10 4 126 37 81 59 27 5419.5
10/5/2017 2017 10 5 127 41 81 61 29 5448.5
10/6/2017 2017 10 6 128 37 68 52.5 20.5 5469
10/7/2017 2017 10 7 129 37 73 55 23 5492
10/8/2017 2017 10 8 130 37 82 59.5 27.5 5519.5
10/9/2017 2017 10 9 131 43 59 51 19 5538.5
10/10/2017 2017 10 10 132 32 61 46.5 14.5 5553
10/11/2017 2017 10 11 133 34 73 53.5 21.5 5574.5
10/12/2017 2017 10 12 134 45 79 62 30 5604.5
10/13/2017 2017 10 13 135 34 75 54.5 22.5 5627
10/14/2017 2017 10 14 136 32 61 46.5 14.5 5641.5
10/15/2017 2017 10 15 137 27 63 45 13 5654.5
10/16/2017 2017 10 16 138 23 68 45.5 13.5 5668
10/17/2017 2017 10 17 139 28 72 50 18 5686
10/18/2017 2017 10 18 140 34 72 53 21 5707
10/19/2017 2017 10 19 141 43 77 60 28 5735
10/20/2017 2017 10 20 142 45 77 61 29 5764
10/21/2017 2017 10 21 143 32 55 43.5 11.5 5775.5
10/22/2017 2017 10 22 144 30 68 49 17 5792.5
10/23/2017 2017 10 23 145 34 73 53.5 21.5 5814
10/24/2017 2017 10 24 146 34 70 52 20 5834
10/25/2017 2017 10 25 147 30 72 51 19 5853
10/26/2017 2017 10 26 148 32 73 52.5 20.5 5873.5
10/27/2017 2017 10 27 149 34 64 49 17 5890.5
10/28/2017 2017 10 28 150 32 68 50 18 5908.5
10/29/2017 2017 10 29 151 30 68 49 17 5925.5
10/30/2017 2017 10 30 152 32 66 49 17 5942.5
10/31/2017 2017 10 31 153 43 70 56.5 24.5 5967
11/1/2017 2017 11 1 154 34 73 53.5 21.5 5988.5
11/2/2017 2017 11 2 155 41 72 56.5 24.5 6013
11/3/2017 2017 11 3 156 55 70 62.5 30.5 6043.5
11/4/2017 2017 11 4 157 52 70 61 29 6072.5
11/5/2017 2017 11 5 158 46 68 57 25 6097.5
11/6/2017 2017 11 6 159 36 64 50 18 6115.5
11/7/2017 2017 11 7 160 32 61 46.5 14.5 6130
11/8/2017 2017 11 8 161 21 50 35.5 3.5 6133.5
11/9/2017 2017 11 9 162 27 55 41 9 6142.5
11/10/2017 2017 11 10 163 27 63 45 13 6155.5
11/11/2017 2017 11 11 164 27 63 45 13 6168.5
11/12/2017 2017 11 12 165 23 55 39 7 6175.5
11/13/2017 2017 11 13 166 25 59 42 10 6185.5
11/14/2017 2017 11 14 167 28 64 46 14 6199.5
11/15/2017 2017 11 15 168 25 61 43 11 6210.5
11/16/2017 2017 11 16 169 27 64 45.5 13.5 6224
11/17/2017 2017 11 17 170 32 70 51 19 6243
11/18/2017 2017 11 18 171 19 46 32.5 0.5 6243.5
11/19/2017 2017 11 19 172 14 46 30 -2 6241.5
11/20/2017 2017 11 20 173 19 46 32.5 0.5 6242
11/21/2017 2017 11 21 174 23 55 39 7 6249
11/22/2017 2017 11 22 175 27 63 45 13 6262
11/23/2017 2017 11 23 176 27 63 45 13 6275
11/24/2017 2017 11 24 177 27 61 44 12 6287
11/25/2017 2017 11 25 178 28 64 46 14 6301
11/26/2017 2017 11 26 179 28 61 44.5 12.5 6313.5
11/27/2017 2017 11 27 180 28 70 49 17 6330.5
11/28/2017 2017 11 28 181 30 55 42.5 10.5 6341
11/29/2017 2017 11 29 182 25 55 40 8 6349
11/30/2017 2017 11 30 183 21 54 37.5 5.5 6354.5
12/1/2017 2017 12 1 184 21 57 39 7 6361.5
12/2/2017 2017 12 2 185 21 59 40 8 6369.5
12/3/2017 2017 12 3 186 34 64 49 17 6386.5
12/4/2017 2017 12 4 187 21 43 32 0 6386.5
12/5/2017 2017 12 5 188 9 41 25 -7 6379.5
12/6/2017 2017 12 6 189 10 46 28 -4 6375.5
12/7/2017 2017 12 7 190 10 41 25.5 -6.5 6369
12/8/2017 2017 12 8 191 10 45 27.5 -4.5 6364.5
12/9/2017 2017 12 9 192 9 48 28.5 -3.5 6361
12/10/2017 2017 12 10 193 7 46 26.5 -5.5 6355.5
12/11/2017 2017 12 11 194 5 46 25.5 -6.5 6349
12/12/2017 2017 12 12 195 10 50 30 -2 6347
12/13/2017 2017 12 13 196 9 46 27.5 -4.5 6342.5
12/14/2017 2017 12 14 197 23 52 37.5 5.5 6348
12/15/2017 2017 12 15 198 12 46 29 -3 6345
12/16/2017 2017 12 16 199 18 39 28.5 -3.5 6341.5
12/17/2017 2017 12 17 200 12 45 28.5 -3.5 6338
12/18/2017 2017 12 18 201 12 45 28.5 -3.5 6334.5
12/19/2017 2017 12 19 202 12 46 29 -3 6331.5
12/20/2017 2017 12 20 203 19 55 37 5 6336.5
12/21/2017 2017 12 21 204 10 37 23.5 -8.5 6328
12/22/2017 2017 12 22 205 1 34 17.5 -14.5 6313.5
12/23/2017 2017 12 23 206 12 43 27.5 -4.5 6309
12/24/2017 2017 12 24 207 19 41 30 -2 6307
12/25/2017 2017 12 25 208 21 50 35.5 3.5 6310.5
12/26/2017 2017 12 26 209 16 36 26 -6 6304.5
12/27/2017 2017 12 27 210 10 45 27.5 -4.5 6300
12/28/2017 2017 12 28 211 12 48 30 -2 6298
12/29/2017 2017 12 29 212 12 45 28.5 -3.5 6294.5
12/30/2017 2017 12 30 213 12 43 27.5 -4.5 6290
12/31/2017 2017 12 31 214 16 37 26.5 -5.5 6284.5
1/1/2018 2018 1 1 215 19 43 31 -1 6283.5
1/2/2018 2018 1 2 216 10 50 30 -2 6281.5
1/3/2018 2018 1 3 217 7 43 25 -7 6274.5
1/4/2018 2018 1 4 218 9 43 26 -6 6268.5
1/5/2018 2018 1 5 219 12 36 24 -8 6260.5
1/6/2018 2018 1 6 220 18 39 28.5 -3.5 6257
1/7/2018 2018 1 7 221 14 50 32 0 6257
1/8/2018 2018 1 8 222 21 34 27.5 -4.5 6252.5
1/9/2018 2018 1 9 223 28 41 34.5 2.5 6255
1/10/2018 2018 1 10 224 32 45 38.5 6.5 6261.5
1/11/2018 2018 1 11 225 21 50 35.5 3.5 6265
1/12/2018 2018 1 12 226 18 52 35 3 6268
1/13/2018 2018 1 13 227 18 50 34 2 6270
1/14/2018 2018 1 14 228 19 50 34.5 2.5 6272.5
1/15/2018 2018 1 15 229 18 52 35 3 6275.5
1/16/2018 2018 1 16 230 14 46 30 -2 6273.5
1/17/2018 2018 1 17 231 19 48 33.5 1.5 6275
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
1/18/2018 2018 1 18 232 16 48 32 0 6275
1/19/2018 2018 1 19 233 23 52 37.5 5.5 6280.5
1/20/2018 2018 1 20 234 32 50 41 9 6289.5
1/21/2018 2018 1 21 235 18 41 29.5 -2.5 6287
1/22/2018 2018 1 22 236 7 39 23 -9 6278
1/23/2018 2018 1 23 237 9 43 26 -6 6272
1/24/2018 2018 1 24 238 10 43 26.5 -5.5 6266.5
1/25/2018 2018 1 25 239 18 54 36 4 6270.5
1/26/2018 2018 1 26 240 19 46 32.5 0.5 6271
1/27/2018 2018 1 27 241 9 45 27 -5 6266
1/28/2018 2018 1 28 242 14 52 33 1 6267
1/29/2018 2018 1 29 243 16 52 34 2 6269
1/30/2018 2018 1 30 244 18 54 36 4 6273
1/31/2018 2018 1 31 245 18 61 39.5 7.5 6280.5
2/1/2018 2018 2 1 246 25 59 42 10 6290.5
2/2/2018 2018 2 2 247 27 61 44 12 6302.5
2/3/2018 2018 2 3 248 27 64 45.5 13.5 6316
2/4/2018 2018 2 4 249 34 68 51 19 6335
2/5/2018 2018 2 5 250 27 64 45.5 13.5 6348.5
2/6/2018 2018 2 6 251 28 54 41 9 6357.5
2/7/2018 2018 2 7 252 18 55 36.5 4.5 6362
2/8/2018 2018 2 8 253 21 55 38 6 6368
2/9/2018 2018 2 9 254 21 61 41 9 6377
2/10/2018 2018 2 10 255 27 50 38.5 6.5 6383.5
2/11/2018 2018 2 11 256 10 46 28 -4 6379.5
2/12/2018 2018 2 12 257 32 46 39 7 6386.5
2/13/2018 2018 2 13 258 36 46 41 9 6395.5
2/14/2018 2018 2 14 259 34 57 45.5 13.5 6409
2/15/2018 2018 2 15 260 27 50 38.5 6.5 6415.5
2/16/2018 2018 2 16 261 14 41 27.5 -4.5 6411
2/17/2018 2018 2 17 262 16 54 35 3 6414
2/18/2018 2018 2 18 263 28 61 44.5 12.5 6426.5
2/19/2018 2018 2 19 264 28 52 40 8 6434.5
2/20/2018 2018 2 20 265 14 36 25 -7 6427.5
2/21/2018 2018 2 21 266 10 37 23.5 -8.5 6419
2/22/2018 2018 2 22 267 21 41 31 -1 6418
2/23/2018 2018 2 23 268 23 41 32 0 6418
2/24/2018 2018 2 24 269 10 39 24.5 -7.5 6410.5
2/25/2018 2018 2 25 270 12 43 27.5 -4.5 6406
2/26/2018 2018 2 26 271 21 54 37.5 5.5 6411.5
2/27/2018 2018 2 27 272 18 55 36.5 4.5 6416
2/28/2018 2018 2 28 273 18 54 36 4 6420
3/1/2018 2018 3 1 274 19 54 36.5 4.5 6424.5
3/2/2018 2018 3 2 275 23 63 43 11 6435.5
3/3/2018 2018 3 3 276 37 63 50 18 6453.5
3/4/2018 2018 3 4 277 21 52 36.5 4.5 6458
3/5/2018 2018 3 5 278 12 46 29 -3 6455
3/6/2018 2018 3 6 279 12 50 31 -1 6454
3/7/2018 2018 3 7 280 14 54 34 2 6456
3/8/2018 2018 3 8 281 25 63 44 12 6468
3/9/2018 2018 3 9 282 27 66 46.5 14.5 6482.5
3/10/2018 2018 3 10 283 28 64 46 14 6496.5
3/11/2018 2018 3 11 284 39 63 51 19 6515.5
3/12/2018 2018 3 12 285 34 63 48.5 16.5 6532
3/13/2018 2018 3 13 286 37 68 52.5 20.5 6552.5
3/14/2018 2018 3 14 287 37 70 53.5 21.5 6574
3/15/2018 2018 3 15 288 36 55 45.5 13.5 6587.5
3/16/2018 2018 3 16 289 21 57 39 7 6594.5
3/17/2018 2018 3 17 290 43 59 51 19 6613.5
3/18/2018 2018 3 18 291 25 46 35.5 3.5 6617
3/19/2018 2018 3 19 292 21 52 36.5 4.5 6621.5
3/20/2018 2018 3 20 293 21 59 40 8 6629.5
3/21/2018 2018 3 21 294 32 64 48 16 6645.5
3/22/2018 2018 3 22 295 43 66 54.5 22.5 6668
3/23/2018 2018 3 23 296 43 68 55.5 23.5 6691.5
3/24/2018 2018 3 24 297 32 63 47.5 15.5 6707
3/25/2018 2018 3 25 298 43 63 53 21 6728
3/26/2018 2018 3 26 299 32 54 43 11 6739
3/27/2018 2018 3 27 300 21 57 39 7 6746
3/28/2018 2018 3 28 301 27 64 45.5 13.5 6759.5
3/29/2018 2018 3 29 302 32 66 49 17 6776.5
3/30/2018 2018 3 30 303 30 70 50 18 6794.5
3/31/2018 2018 3 31 304 32 77 54.5 22.5 6817
4/1/2018 2018 4 1 305 46 77 61.5 29.5 6846.5
4/2/2018 2018 4 2 306 50 77 63.5 31.5 6878
4/3/2018 2018 4 3 307 34 55 44.5 12.5 6890.5
4/4/2018 2018 4 4 308 23 68 45.5 13.5 6904
4/5/2018 2018 4 5 309 32 70 51 19 6923
4/6/2018 2018 4 6 310 43 73 58 26 6949
4/7/2018 2018 4 7 311 48 79 63.5 31.5 6980.5
4/8/2018 2018 4 8 312 45 68 56.5 24.5 7005
4/9/2018 2018 4 9 313 34 66 50 18 7023
4/10/2018 2018 4 10 314 32 73 52.5 20.5 7043.5
4/11/2018 2018 4 11 315 45 86 65.5 33.5 7077
4/12/2018 2018 4 12 316 37 72 54.5 22.5 7099.5
4/13/2018 2018 4 13 317 34 54 44 12 7111.5
4/14/2018 2018 4 14 318 28 64 46 14 7125.5
4/15/2018 2018 4 15 319 32 73 52.5 20.5 7146
4/16/2018 2018 4 16 320 61 77 69 37 7183
4/17/2018 2018 4 17 321 32 61 46.5 14.5 7197.5
4/18/2018 2018 4 18 322 25 61 43 11 7208.5
4/19/2018 2018 4 19 323 32 70 51 19 7227.5
4/20/2018 2018 4 20 324 43 59 51 19 7246.5
4/21/2018 2018 4 21 325 32 73 52.5 20.5 7267
4/22/2018 2018 4 22 326 41 77 59 27 7294
4/23/2018 2018 4 23 327 41 84 62.5 30.5 7324.5
4/24/2018 2018 4 24 328 46 77 61.5 29.5 7354
4/25/2018 2018 4 25 329 41 72 56.5 24.5 7378.5
4/26/2018 2018 4 26 330 39 79 59 27 7405.5
4/27/2018 2018 4 27 331 36 86 61 29 7434.5
4/28/2018 2018 4 28 332 48 86 67 35 7469.5
4/29/2018 2018 4 29 333 63 79 71 39 7508.5
4/30/2018 2018 4 30 334 43 68 55.5 23.5 7532
5/1/2018 2018 5 1 335 46 63 54.5 22.5 7554.5
5/2/2018 2018 5 2 336 45 59 52 20 7574.5
5/3/2018 2018 5 3 337 41 68 54.5 22.5 7597
5/4/2018 2018 5 4 338 41 75 58 26 7623
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
5/5/2018 2018 5 5 339 43 81 62 30 7653
5/6/2018 2018 5 6 340 48 86 67 35 7688
5/7/2018 2018 5 7 341 50 88 69 37 7725
5/8/2018 2018 5 8 342 45 91 68 36 7761
5/9/2018 2018 5 9 343 50 93 71.5 39.5 7800.5
5/10/2018 2018 5 10 344 54 91 72.5 40.5 7841
5/11/2018 2018 5 11 345 59 88 73.5 41.5 7882.5
5/12/2018 2018 5 12 346 50 77 63.5 31.5 7914
5/13/2018 2018 5 13 347 45 79 62 30 7944
5/14/2018 2018 5 14 348 43 81 62 30 7974
5/15/2018 2018 5 15 349 43 82 62.5 30.5 8004.5
5/16/2018 2018 5 16 350 45 88 66.5 34.5 8039
5/17/2018 2018 5 17 351 46 86 66 34 8073
5/18/2018 2018 5 18 352 43 82 62.5 30.5 8103.5
5/19/2018 2018 5 19 353 46 82 64 32 8135.5
5/20/2018 2018 5 20 354 55 82 68.5 36.5 8172
5/21/2018 2018 5 21 355 46 84 65 33 8205
5/22/2018 2018 5 22 356 59 81 70 38 8243
5/23/2018 2018 5 23 357 45 84 64.5 32.5 8275.5
5/24/2018 2018 5 24 358 46 90 68 36 8311.5
5/25/2018 2018 5 25 359 48 90 69 37 8348.5
5/26/2018 2018 5 26 360 61 90 75.5 43.5 8392
5/27/2018 2018 5 27 361 52 81 66.5 34.5 8426.5
5/28/2018 2018 5 28 362 46 79 62.5 30.5 8457
5/29/2018 2018 5 29 363 48 86 67 35 8492
5/30/2018 2018 5 30 364 54 86 70 38 8530
5/31/2018 2018 5 31 365 50 90 70 38 8568
6/1/2018 2018 6 1 1 61 88 74.5 42.5 42.5
6/2/2018 2018 6 2 2 48 88 68 36 78.5
6/3/2018 2018 6 3 3 54 95 74.5 42.5 121
6/4/2018 2018 6 4 4 59 99 79 47 168
6/5/2018 2018 6 5 5 59 97 78 46 214
6/6/2018 2018 6 6 6 55 95 75 43 257
6/7/2018 2018 6 7 7 52 95 73.5 41.5 298.5
6/8/2018 2018 6 8 8 54 95 74.5 42.5 341
6/9/2018 2018 6 9 9 54 95 74.5 42.5 383.5
6/10/2018 2018 6 10 10 66 95 80.5 48.5 432
6/11/2018 2018 6 11 11 46 91 68.5 36.5 468.5
6/12/2018 2018 6 12 12 54 99 76.5 44.5 513
6/13/2018 2018 6 13 13 57 100 78.5 46.5 559.5
6/14/2018 2018 6 14 14 59 100 79.5 47.5 607
6/15/2018 2018 6 15 15 63 99 81 49 656
6/16/2018 2018 6 16 16 72 86 79 47 703
6/17/2018 2018 6 17 17 70 90 80 48 751
6/18/2018 2018 6 18 18 68 88 78 46 797
6/19/2018 2018 6 19 19 52 91 71.5 39.5 836.5
6/20/2018 2018 6 20 20 55 95 75 43 879.5
6/21/2018 2018 6 21 21 54 104 79 47 926.5
6/22/2018 2018 6 22 22 61 95 78 46 972.5
6/23/2018 2018 6 23 23 63 100 81.5 49.5 1022
6/24/2018 2018 6 24 24 70 91 80.5 48.5 1070.5
6/25/2018 2018 6 25 25 54 99 76.5 44.5 1115
6/26/2018 2018 6 26 26 55 104 79.5 47.5 1162.5
6/27/2018 2018 6 27 27 63 106 84.5 52.5 1215
6/28/2018 2018 6 28 28 59 99 79 47 1262
6/29/2018 2018 6 29 29 70 97 83.5 51.5 1313.5
6/30/2018 2018 6 30 30 55 91 73 41 1354.5
7/1/2018 2018 7 1 31 52 95 73.5 41.5 1396
7/2/2018 2018 7 2 32 54 100 77 45 1441
7/3/2018 2018 7 3 33 61 99 80 48 1489
7/4/2018 2018 7 4 34 55 99 77 45 1534
7/5/2018 2018 7 5 35 68 100 84 52 1586
7/6/2018 2018 7 6 36 75 99 87 55 1641
7/7/2018 2018 7 7 37 73 100 86.5 54.5 1695.5
7/8/2018 2018 7 8 38 72 102 87 55 1750.5
7/9/2018 2018 7 9 39 77 100 88.5 56.5 1807
7/10/2018 2018 7 10 40 70 100 85 53 1860
7/11/2018 2018 7 11 41 70 99 84.5 52.5 1912.5
7/12/2018 2018 7 12 42 70 95 82.5 50.5 1963
7/13/2018 2018 7 13 43 66 99 82.5 50.5 2013.5
7/14/2018 2018 7 14 44 73 88 80.5 48.5 2062
7/15/2018 2018 7 15 45 70 97 83.5 51.5 2113.5
7/16/2018 2018 7 16 46 68 99 83.5 51.5 2165
7/17/2018 2018 7 17 47 72 97 84.5 52.5 2217.5
7/18/2018 2018 7 18 48 68 100 84 52 2269.5
7/19/2018 2018 7 19 49 68 104 86 54 2323.5
7/20/2018 2018 7 20 50 75 100 87.5 55.5 2379
7/21/2018 2018 7 21 51 68 104 86 54 2433
7/22/2018 2018 7 22 52 64 102 83 51 2484
7/23/2018 2018 7 23 53 68 99 83.5 51.5 2535.5
7/24/2018 2018 7 24 54 72 99 85.5 53.5 2589
7/25/2018 2018 7 25 55 70 100 85 53 2642
7/26/2018 2018 7 26 56 72 100 86 54 2696
7/27/2018 2018 7 27 57 68 99 83.5 51.5 2747.5
7/28/2018 2018 7 28 58 68 100 84 52 2799.5
7/29/2018 2018 7 29 59 61 100 80.5 48.5 2848
7/30/2018 2018 7 30 60 61 99 80 48 2896
7/31/2018 2018 7 31 61 61 102 81.5 49.5 2945.5
8/1/2018 2018 8 1 62 66 99 82.5 50.5 2996
8/2/2018 2018 8 2 63 64 99 81.5 49.5 3045.5
8/3/2018 2018 8 3 64 72 97 84.5 52.5 3098
8/4/2018 2018 8 4 65 66 97 81.5 49.5 3147.5
8/5/2018 2018 8 5 66 64 100 82 50 3197.5
8/6/2018 2018 8 6 67 61 99 80 48 3245.5
8/7/2018 2018 8 7 68 59 99 79 47 3292.5
8/8/2018 2018 8 8 69 55 102 78.5 46.5 3339
8/9/2018 2018 8 9 70 59 100 79.5 47.5 3386.5
8/10/2018 2018 8 10 71 63 100 81.5 49.5 3436
8/11/2018 2018 8 11 72 75 97 86 54 3490
8/12/2018 2018 8 12 73 64 100 82 50 3540
8/13/2018 2018 8 13 74 68 100 84 52 3592
8/14/2018 2018 8 14 75 64 99 81.5 49.5 3641.5
8/15/2018 2018 8 15 76 66 95 80.5 48.5 3690
8/16/2018 2018 8 16 77 61 97 79 47 3737
8/17/2018 2018 8 17 78 73 97 85 53 3790
8/18/2018 2018 8 18 79 68 97 82.5 50.5 3840.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
8/19/2018 2018 8 19 80 55 91 73 41 3881.5
8/20/2018 2018 8 20 81 57 99 78 46 3927.5
8/21/2018 2018 8 21 82 63 93 78 46 3973.5
8/22/2018 2018 8 22 83 63 79 71 39 4012.5
8/23/2018 2018 8 23 84 61 86 73.5 41.5 4054
8/24/2018 2018 8 24 85 57 91 74 42 4096
8/25/2018 2018 8 25 86 61 95 78 46 4142
8/26/2018 2018 8 26 87 66 88 77 45 4187
8/27/2018 2018 8 27 88 66 95 80.5 48.5 4235.5
8/28/2018 2018 8 28 89 57 91 74 42 4277.5
8/29/2018 2018 8 29 90 55 93 74 42 4319.5
8/30/2018 2018 8 30 91 61 95 78 46 4365.5
8/31/2018 2018 8 31 92 61 91 76 44 4409.5
9/1/2018 2018 9 1 93 54 90 72 40 4449.5
9/2/2018 2018 9 2 94 54 90 72 40 4489.5
9/3/2018 2018 9 3 95 59 90 74.5 42.5 4532
9/4/2018 2018 9 4 96 61 88 74.5 42.5 4574.5
9/5/2018 2018 9 5 97 64 84 74 42 4616.5
9/6/2018 2018 9 6 98 57 88 72.5 40.5 4657
9/7/2018 2018 9 7 99 55 90 72.5 40.5 4697.5
9/8/2018 2018 9 8 100 54 95 74.5 42.5 4740
9/9/2018 2018 9 9 101 61 97 79 47 4787
9/10/2018 2018 9 10 102 57 97 77 45 4832
9/11/2018 2018 9 11 103 55 95 75 43 4875
9/12/2018 2018 9 12 104 59 91 75 43 4918
9/13/2018 2018 9 13 105 57 91 74 42 4960
9/14/2018 2018 9 14 106 46 91 68.5 36.5 4996.5
9/15/2018 2018 9 15 107 46 95 70.5 38.5 5035
9/16/2018 2018 9 16 108 57 95 76 44 5079
9/17/2018 2018 9 17 109 59 95 77 45 5124
9/18/2018 2018 9 18 110 55 95 75 43 5167
9/19/2018 2018 9 19 111 55 90 72.5 40.5 5207.5
9/20/2018 2018 9 20 112 50 84 67 35 5242.5
9/21/2018 2018 9 21 113 41 86 63.5 31.5 5274
9/22/2018 2018 9 22 114 41 90 65.5 33.5 5307.5
9/23/2018 2018 9 23 115 54 90 72 40 5347.5
9/24/2018 2018 9 24 116 59 90 74.5 42.5 5390
9/25/2018 2018 9 25 117 48 79 63.5 31.5 5421.5
9/26/2018 2018 9 26 118 37 81 59 27 5448.5
9/27/2018 2018 9 27 119 37 84 60.5 28.5 5477
9/28/2018 2018 9 28 120 41 90 65.5 33.5 5510.5
9/29/2018 2018 9 29 121 54 90 72 40 5550.5
9/30/2018 2018 9 30 122 72 86 79 47 5597.5
10/1/2018 2018 10 1 123 61 81 71 39 5636.5
10/2/2018 2018 10 2 124 61 73 67 35 5671.5
10/3/2018 2018 10 3 125 52 81 66.5 34.5 5706
10/4/2018 2018 10 4 126 50 73 61.5 29.5 5735.5
10/5/2018 2018 10 5 127 46 70 58 26 5761.5
10/6/2018 2018 10 6 128 45 63 54 22 5783.5
10/7/2018 2018 10 7 129 46 50 48 16 5799.5
10/8/2018 2018 10 8 130 45 54 49.5 17.5 5817
10/9/2018 2018 10 9 131 45 59 52 20 5837
10/10/2018 2018 10 10 132 45 61 53 21 5858
10/11/2018 2018 10 11 133 46 59 52.5 20.5 5878.5
10/12/2018 2018 10 12 134 41 61 51 19 5897.5
10/13/2018 2018 10 13 135 37 64 50.5 18.5 5916
10/14/2018 2018 10 14 136 37 54 45.5 13.5 5929.5
10/15/2018 2018 10 15 137 30 52 41 9 5938.5
10/16/2018 2018 10 16 138 28 59 43.5 11.5 5950
10/17/2018 2018 10 17 139 41 52 46.5 14.5 5964.5
10/18/2018 2018 10 18 140 39 50 44.5 12.5 5977
10/19/2018 2018 10 19 141 34 59 46.5 14.5 5991.5
10/20/2018 2018 10 20 142 36 61 48.5 16.5 6008
10/21/2018 2018 10 21 143 45 63 54 22 6030
10/22/2018 2018 10 22 144 43 61 52 20 6050
10/23/2018 2018 10 23 145 43 57 50 18 6068
10/24/2018 2018 10 24 146 39 63 51 19 6087
10/25/2018 2018 10 25 147 41 63 52 20 6107
10/26/2018 2018 10 26 148 36 64 50 18 6125
10/27/2018 2018 10 27 149 36 66 51 19 6144
10/28/2018 2018 10 28 150 37 68 52.5 20.5 6164.5
10/29/2018 2018 10 29 151 39 77 58 26 6190.5
10/30/2018 2018 10 30 152 46 61 53.5 21.5 6212
10/31/2018 2018 10 31 153 37 55 46 14 6226
11/1/2018 2018 11 1 154 43 63 53 21 6247
11/2/2018 2018 11 2 155 34 68 51 19 6266
11/3/2018 2018 11 3 156 37 61 49 17 6283
11/4/2018 2018 11 4 157 32 59 45.5 13.5 6296.5
11/5/2018 2018 11 5 158 32 61 46.5 14.5 6311
11/6/2018 2018 11 6 159 28 59 43.5 11.5 6322.5
11/7/2018 2018 11 7 160 25 54 39.5 7.5 6330
11/8/2018 2018 11 8 161 27 48 37.5 5.5 6335.5
11/9/2018 2018 11 9 162 19 50 34.5 2.5 6338
11/10/2018 2018 11 10 163 18 50 34 2 6340
11/11/2018 2018 11 11 164 21 48 34.5 2.5 6342.5
11/12/2018 2018 11 12 165 21 43 32 0 6342.5
11/13/2018 2018 11 13 166 18 46 32 0 6342.5
11/14/2018 2018 11 14 167 21 50 35.5 3.5 6346
11/15/2018 2018 11 15 168 19 52 35.5 3.5 6349.5
11/16/2018 2018 11 16 169 21 52 36.5 4.5 6354
11/17/2018 2018 11 17 170 21 54 37.5 5.5 6359.5
11/18/2018 2018 11 18 171 23 46 34.5 2.5 6362
11/19/2018 2018 11 19 172 18 46 32 0 6362
11/20/2018 2018 11 20 173 18 46 32 0 6362
11/21/2018 2018 11 21 174 16 48 32 0 6362
11/22/2018 2018 11 22 175 23 50 36.5 4.5 6366.5
11/23/2018 2018 11 23 176 23 55 39 7 6373.5
11/24/2018 2018 11 24 177 25 61 43 11 6384.5
11/25/2018 2018 11 25 178 18 45 31.5 -0.5 6384
11/26/2018 2018 11 26 179 14 45 29.5 -2.5 6381.5
11/27/2018 2018 11 27 180 16 43 29.5 -2.5 6379
11/28/2018 2018 11 28 181 25 45 35 3 6382
11/29/2018 2018 11 29 182 30 50 40 8 6390
11/30/2018 2018 11 30 183 32 50 41 9 6399
12/1/2018 2018 12 1 184 32 45 38.5 6.5 6405.5
12/2/2018 2018 12 2 185 14 37 25.5 -6.5 6399
12/3/2018 2018 12 3 186 3 32 17.5 -14.5 6384.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
12/4/2018 2018 12 4 187 0 28 14 -18 6366.5
12/5/2018 2018 12 5 188 14 28 21 -11 6355.5
12/6/2018 2018 12 6 189 18 34 26 -6 6349.5
12/7/2018 2018 12 7 190 18 36 27 -5 6344.5
12/8/2018 2018 12 8 191 18 37 27.5 -4.5 6340
12/9/2018 2018 12 9 192 14 39 26.5 -5.5 6334.5
12/10/2018 2018 12 10 193 16 36 26 -6 6328.5
12/11/2018 2018 12 11 194 23 41 32 0 6328.5
12/12/2018 2018 12 12 195 19 41 30 -2 6326.5
12/13/2018 2018 12 13 196 18 37 27.5 -4.5 6322
12/14/2018 2018 12 14 197 18 36 27 -5 6317
12/15/2018 2018 12 15 198 25 41 33 1 6318
12/16/2018 2018 12 16 199 19 43 31 -1 6317
12/17/2018 2018 12 17 200 23 36 29.5 -2.5 6314.5
12/18/2018 2018 12 18 201 21 43 32 0 6314.5
12/19/2018 2018 12 19 202 21 52 36.5 4.5 6319
12/20/2018 2018 12 20 203 21 45 33 1 6320
12/21/2018 2018 12 21 204 27 41 34 2 6322
12/22/2018 2018 12 22 205 21 46 33.5 1.5 6323.5
12/23/2018 2018 12 23 206 25 43 34 2 6325.5
12/24/2018 2018 12 24 207 25 43 34 2 6327.5
12/25/2018 2018 12 25 208 30 41 35.5 3.5 6331
12/26/2018 2018 12 26 209 28 45 36.5 4.5 6335.5
12/27/2018 2018 12 27 210 19 32 25.5 -6.5 6329
12/28/2018 2018 12 28 211 9 30 19.5 -12.5 6316.5
12/29/2018 2018 12 29 212 5 30 17.5 -14.5 6302
12/30/2018 2018 12 30 213 9 30 19.5 -12.5 6289.5
12/31/2018 2018 12 31 214 18 32 25 -7 6282.5
1/1/2019 2019 1 1 215 9 28 18.5 -13.5 6269
1/2/2019 2019 1 2 216 1 27 14 -18 6251
1/3/2019 2019 1 3 217 5 30 17.5 -14.5 6236.5
1/4/2019 2019 1 4 218 7 32 19.5 -12.5 6224
1/5/2019 2019 1 5 219 9 27 18 -14 6210
1/6/2019 2019 1 6 220 23 36 29.5 -2.5 6207.5
1/7/2019 2019 1 7 221 27 46 36.5 4.5 6212
1/8/2019 2019 1 8 222 23 41 32 0 6212
1/9/2019 2019 1 9 223 25 37 31 -1 6211
1/10/2019 2019 1 10 224 23 41 32 0 6211
1/11/2019 2019 1 11 225 23 48 35.5 3.5 6214.5
1/12/2019 2019 1 12 226 19 43 31 -1 6213.5
1/13/2019 2019 1 13 227 28 43 35.5 3.5 6217
1/14/2019 2019 1 14 228 25 39 32 0 6217
1/15/2019 2019 1 15 229 30 34 32 0 6217
1/16/2019 2019 1 16 230 27 37 32 0 6217
1/17/2019 2019 1 17 231 30 45 37.5 5.5 6222.5
1/18/2019 2019 1 18 232 28 48 38 6 6228.5
1/19/2019 2019 1 19 233 23 43 33 1 6229.5
1/20/2019 2019 1 20 234 25 37 31 -1 6228.5
1/21/2019 2019 1 21 235 25 48 36.5 4.5 6233
1/22/2019 2019 1 22 236 23 41 32 0 6233
1/23/2019 2019 1 23 237 18 41 29.5 -2.5 6230.5
1/24/2019 2019 1 24 238 19 50 34.5 2.5 6233
1/25/2019 2019 1 25 239 19 45 32 0 6233
1/26/2019 2019 1 26 240 19 48 33.5 1.5 6234.5
1/27/2019 2019 1 27 241 23 45 34 2 6236.5
1/28/2019 2019 1 28 242 21 52 36.5 4.5 6241
1/29/2019 2019 1 29 243 21 41 31 -1 6240
1/30/2019 2019 1 30 244 14 43 28.5 -3.5 6236.5
1/31/2019 2019 1 31 245 18 45 31.5 -0.5 6236
2/1/2019 2019 2 1 246 16 48 32 0 6236
2/2/2019 2019 2 2 247 23 46 34.5 2.5 6238.5
2/3/2019 2019 2 3 248 36 54 45 13 6251.5
2/4/2019 2019 2 4 249 39 50 44.5 12.5 6264
2/5/2019 2019 2 5 250 34 50 42 10 6274
2/6/2019 2019 2 6 251 28 36 32 0 6274
2/7/2019 2019 2 7 252 14 36 25 -7 6267
2/8/2019 2019 2 8 253 18 37 27.5 -4.5 6262.5
2/9/2019 2019 2 9 254 14 39 26.5 -5.5 6257
2/10/2019 2019 2 10 255 25 48 36.5 4.5 6261.5
2/11/2019 2019 2 11 256 23 43 33 1 6262.5
2/12/2019 2019 2 12 257 18 45 31.5 -0.5 6262
2/13/2019 2019 2 13 258 30 50 40 8 6270
2/14/2019 2019 2 14 259 34 43 38.5 6.5 6276.5
2/15/2019 2019 2 15 260 32 54 43 11 6287.5
2/16/2019 2019 2 16 261 27 43 35 3 6290.5
2/17/2019 2019 2 17 262 19 36 27.5 -4.5 6286
2/18/2019 2019 2 18 263 19 30 24.5 -7.5 6278.5
2/19/2019 2019 2 19 264 9 32 20.5 -11.5 6267
2/20/2019 2019 2 20 265 3 32 17.5 -14.5 6252.5
2/21/2019 2019 2 21 266 21 32 26.5 -5.5 6247
2/22/2019 2019 2 22 267 18 36 27 -5 6242
2/23/2019 2019 2 23 268 7 34 20.5 -11.5 6230.5
2/24/2019 2019 2 24 269 7 34 20.5 -11.5 6219
2/25/2019 2019 2 25 270 14 36 25 -7 6212
2/26/2019 2019 2 26 271 18 43 30.5 -1.5 6210.5
2/27/2019 2019 2 27 272 21 45 33 1 6211.5
2/28/2019 2019 2 28 273 30 55 42.5 10.5 6222
3/1/2019 2019 3 1 274 36 61 48.5 16.5 6238.5
3/2/2019 2019 3 2 275 37 54 45.5 13.5 6252
3/3/2019 2019 3 3 276 34 54 44 12 6264
3/4/2019 2019 3 4 277 36 52 44 12 6276
3/5/2019 2019 3 5 278 32 52 42 10 6286
3/6/2019 2019 3 6 279 39 61 50 18 6304
3/7/2019 2019 3 7 280 43 61 52 20 6324
3/8/2019 2019 3 8 281 36 55 45.5 13.5 6337.5
3/9/2019 2019 3 9 282 28 52 40 8 6345.5
3/10/2019 2019 3 10 283 36 52 44 12 6357.5
3/11/2019 2019 3 11 284 37 57 47 15 6372.5
3/12/2019 2019 3 12 285 45 50 47.5 15.5 6388
3/13/2019 2019 3 13 286 34 43 38.5 6.5 6394.5
3/14/2019 2019 3 14 287 32 46 39 7 6401.5
3/15/2019 2019 3 15 288 27 50 38.5 6.5 6408
3/16/2019 2019 3 16 289 23 55 39 7 6415
3/17/2019 2019 3 17 290 23 61 42 10 6425
3/18/2019 2019 3 18 291 27 63 45 13 6438
3/19/2019 2019 3 19 292 32 61 46.5 14.5 6452.5
3/20/2019 2019 3 20 293 30 59 44.5 12.5 6465
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
3/21/2019 2019 3 21 294 34 48 41 9 6474
3/22/2019 2019 3 22 295 32 52 42 10 6484
3/23/2019 2019 3 23 296 34 57 45.5 13.5 6497.5
3/24/2019 2019 3 24 297 37 64 50.5 18.5 6516
3/25/2019 2019 3 25 298 32 61 46.5 14.5 6530.5
3/26/2019 2019 3 26 299 34 64 49 17 6547.5
3/27/2019 2019 3 27 300 36 70 53 21 6568.5
3/28/2019 2019 3 28 301 50 70 60 28 6596.5
3/29/2019 2019 3 29 302 39 55 47 15 6611.5
3/30/2019 2019 3 30 303 32 55 43.5 11.5 6623
3/31/2019 2019 3 31 304 32 57 44.5 12.5 6635.5
4/1/2019 2019 4 1 305 32 63 47.5 15.5 6651
4/2/2019 2019 4 2 306 41 63 52 20 6671
4/3/2019 2019 4 3 307 46 64 55 23 6694
4/4/2019 2019 4 4 308 37 68 52.5 20.5 6714.5
4/5/2019 2019 4 5 309 39 68 53.5 21.5 6736
4/6/2019 2019 4 6 310 46 70 58 26 6762
4/7/2019 2019 4 7 311 36 72 54 22 6784
4/8/2019 2019 4 8 312 41 79 60 28 6812
4/9/2019 2019 4 9 313 48 79 63.5 31.5 6843.5
4/10/2019 2019 4 10 314 41 50 45.5 13.5 6857
4/11/2019 2019 4 11 315 37 55 46 14 6871
4/12/2019 2019 4 12 316 32 57 44.5 12.5 6883.5
4/13/2019 2019 4 13 317 32 63 47.5 15.5 6899
4/14/2019 2019 4 14 318 34 73 53.5 21.5 6920.5
4/15/2019 2019 4 15 319 57 73 65 33 6953.5
4/16/2019 2019 4 16 320 48 63 55.5 23.5 6977
4/17/2019 2019 4 17 321 41 70 55.5 23.5 7000.5
4/18/2019 2019 4 18 322 37 73 55 23 7023.5
4/19/2019 2019 4 19 323 37 81 59 27 7050.5
4/20/2019 2019 4 20 324 46 77 61.5 29.5 7080
4/21/2019 2019 4 21 325 54 75 64.5 32.5 7112.5
4/22/2019 2019 4 22 326 46 73 59.5 27.5 7140
4/23/2019 2019 4 23 327 41 77 59 27 7167
4/24/2019 2019 4 24 328 45 81 63 31 7198
4/25/2019 2019 4 25 329 48 81 64.5 32.5 7230.5
4/26/2019 2019 4 26 330 50 81 65.5 33.5 7264
4/27/2019 2019 4 27 331 48 82 65 33 7297
4/28/2019 2019 4 28 332 55 82 68.5 36.5 7333.5
4/29/2019 2019 4 29 333 50 70 60 28 7361.5
4/30/2019 2019 4 30 334 46 70 58 26 7387.5
5/1/2019 2019 5 1 335 41 61 51 19 7406.5
5/2/2019 2019 5 2 336 34 68 51 19 7425.5
5/3/2019 2019 5 3 337 36 73 54.5 22.5 7448
5/4/2019 2019 5 4 338 41 77 59 27 7475
5/5/2019 2019 5 5 339 43 79 61 29 7504
5/6/2019 2019 5 6 340 39 79 59 27 7531
5/7/2019 2019 5 7 341 41 73 57 25 7556
5/8/2019 2019 5 8 342 46 63 54.5 22.5 7578.5
5/9/2019 2019 5 9 343 37 61 49 17 7595.5
5/10/2019 2019 5 10 344 45 61 53 21 7616.5
5/11/2019 2019 5 11 345 37 72 54.5 22.5 7639
5/12/2019 2019 5 12 346 43 79 61 29 7668
5/13/2019 2019 5 13 347 43 84 63.5 31.5 7699.5
5/14/2019 2019 5 14 348 46 88 67 35 7734.5
5/15/2019 2019 5 15 349 50 84 67 35 7769.5
5/16/2019 2019 5 16 350 57 81 69 37 7806.5
5/17/2019 2019 5 17 351 46 63 54.5 22.5 7829
5/18/2019 2019 5 18 352 36 70 53 21 7850
5/19/2019 2019 5 19 353 46 64 55 23 7873
5/20/2019 2019 5 20 354 41 55 48 16 7889
5/21/2019 2019 5 21 355 36 61 48.5 16.5 7905.5
5/22/2019 2019 5 22 356 36 54 45 13 7918.5
5/23/2019 2019 5 23 357 41 55 48 16 7934.5
5/24/2019 2019 5 24 358 39 64 51.5 19.5 7954
5/25/2019 2019 5 25 359 41 75 58 26 7980
5/26/2019 2019 5 26 360 41 77 59 27 8007
5/27/2019 2019 5 27 361 46 61 53.5 21.5 8028.5
5/28/2019 2019 5 28 362 45 64 54.5 22.5 8051
5/29/2019 2019 5 29 363 43 70 56.5 24.5 8075.5
5/30/2019 2019 5 30 364 54 77 65.5 33.5 8109
5/31/2019 2019 5 31 365 50 81 65.5 33.5 8142.5
6/1/2019 2019 6 1 1 52 86 69 37 37
6/2/2019 2019 6 2 2 54 86 70 38 75
6/3/2019 2019 6 3 3 50 84 67 35 110
6/4/2019 2019 6 4 4 50 88 69 37 147
6/5/2019 2019 6 5 5 54 90 72 40 187
6/6/2019 2019 6 6 6 55 90 72.5 40.5 227.5
6/7/2019 2019 6 7 7 54 88 71 39 266.5
6/8/2019 2019 6 8 8 59 82 70.5 38.5 305
6/9/2019 2019 6 9 9 46 75 60.5 28.5 333.5
6/10/2019 2019 6 10 10 41 84 62.5 30.5 364
6/11/2019 2019 6 11 11 46 57 51.5 19.5 383.5
8/26/2019 2019 8 26 87 64 91 77.5 45.5 429
8/27/2019 2019 8 27 88 52 95 73.5 41.5 470.5
8/28/2019 2019 8 28 89 52 99 75.5 43.5 514
8/29/2019 2019 8 29 90 68 95 81.5 49.5 563.5
8/30/2019 2019 8 30 91 59 99 79 47 610.5
8/31/2019 2019 8 31 92 63 99 81 49 659.5
9/1/2019 2019 9 1 93 55 102 78.5 46.5 706
9/2/2019 2019 9 2 94 55 100 77.5 45.5 751.5
9/3/2019 2019 9 3 95 68 99 83.5 51.5 803
9/4/2019 2019 9 4 96 64 99 81.5 49.5 852.5
9/5/2019 2019 9 5 97 68 97 82.5 50.5 903
9/6/2019 2019 9 6 98 63 99 81 49 952
9/7/2019 2019 9 7 99 59 95 77 45 997
9/8/2019 2019 9 8 100 64 90 77 45 1042
9/9/2019 2019 9 9 101 50 88 69 37 1079
9/10/2019 2019 9 10 102 59 90 74.5 42.5 1121.5
9/11/2019 2019 9 11 103 54 77 65.5 33.5 1155
9/12/2019 2019 9 12 104 41 77 59 27 1182
9/13/2019 2019 9 13 105 41 84 62.5 30.5 1212.5
9/14/2019 2019 9 14 106 45 90 67.5 35.5 1248
9/15/2019 2019 9 15 107 48 88 68 36 1284
9/16/2019 2019 9 16 108 63 86 74.5 42.5 1326.5
9/17/2019 2019 9 17 109 63 86 74.5 42.5 1369
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
9/18/2019 2019 9 18 110 45 86 65.5 33.5 1402.5
9/19/2019 2019 9 19 111 66 86 76 44 1446.5
9/20/2019 2019 9 20 112 50 77 63.5 31.5 1478
9/21/2019 2019 9 21 113 41 73 57 25 1503
9/22/2019 2019 9 22 114 37 79 58 26 1529
9/23/2019 2019 9 23 115 45 82 63.5 31.5 1560.5
9/24/2019 2019 9 24 116 46 82 64 32 1592.5
9/25/2019 2019 9 25 117 46 86 66 34 1626.5
9/26/2019 2019 9 26 118 46 88 67 35 1661.5
9/27/2019 2019 9 27 119 54 86 70 38 1699.5
9/28/2019 2019 9 28 120 61 82 71.5 39.5 1739
9/29/2019 2019 9 29 121 63 79 71 39 1778
9/30/2019 2019 9 30 122 55 75 65 33 1811
10/1/2019 2019 10 1 123 45 75 60 28 1839
10/2/2019 2019 10 2 124 36 72 54 22 1861
10/3/2019 2019 10 3 125 32 81 56.5 24.5 1885.5
10/4/2019 2019 10 4 126 45 81 63 31 1916.5
10/5/2019 2019 10 5 127 32 72 52 20 1936.5
10/6/2019 2019 10 6 128 32 68 50 18 1954.5
10/7/2019 2019 10 7 129 25 70 47.5 15.5 1970
10/8/2019 2019 10 8 130 32 81 56.5 24.5 1994.5
10/9/2019 2019 10 9 131 45 82 63.5 31.5 2026
10/10/2019 2019 10 10 132 32 54 43 11 2037
10/11/2019 2019 10 11 133 19 55 37 5 2042
10/12/2019 2019 10 12 134 16 61 38.5 6.5 2048.5
10/13/2019 2019 10 13 135 19 66 42.5 10.5 2059
10/14/2019 2019 10 14 136 27 72 49.5 17.5 2076.5
10/15/2019 2019 10 15 137 30 73 51.5 19.5 2096
10/16/2019 2019 10 16 138 32 77 54.5 22.5 2118.5
10/17/2019 2019 10 17 139 36 77 56.5 24.5 2143
10/18/2019 2019 10 18 140 39 64 51.5 19.5 2162.5
10/19/2019 2019 10 19 141 27 70 48.5 16.5 2179
10/20/2019 2019 10 20 142 37 55 46 14 2193
10/21/2019 2019 10 21 143 25 64 44.5 12.5 2205.5
10/22/2019 2019 10 22 144 32 70 51 19 2224.5
10/23/2019 2019 10 23 145 36 70 53 21 2245.5
10/24/2019 2019 10 24 146 32 54 43 11 2256.5
10/25/2019 2019 10 25 147 25 61 43 11 2267.5
10/26/2019 2019 10 26 148 23 70 46.5 14.5 2282
10/27/2019 2019 10 27 149 32 52 42 10 2292
10/28/2019 2019 10 28 150 23 45 34 2 2294
10/29/2019 2019 10 29 151 27 50 38.5 6.5 2300.5
10/30/2019 2019 10 30 152 9 36 22.5 -9.5 2291
10/31/2019 2019 10 31 153 9 41 25 -7 2284
11/1/2019 2019 11 1 154 10 50 30 -2 2282
11/2/2019 2019 11 2 155 10 54 32 0 2282
11/3/2019 2019 11 3 156 14 55 34.5 2.5 2284.5
11/4/2019 2019 11 4 157 19 63 41 9 2293.5
11/5/2019 2019 11 5 158 23 64 43.5 11.5 2305
11/6/2019 2019 11 6 159 23 63 43 11 2316
11/7/2019 2019 11 7 160 21 64 42.5 10.5 2326.5
11/8/2019 2019 11 8 161 21 64 42.5 10.5 2337
11/9/2019 2019 11 9 162 23 64 43.5 11.5 2348.5
11/10/2019 2019 11 10 163 21 63 42 10 2358.5
11/11/2019 2019 11 11 164 27 63 45 13 2371.5
11/12/2019 2019 11 12 165 19 55 37 5 2376.5
11/13/2019 2019 11 13 166 21 57 39 7 2383.5
11/14/2019 2019 11 14 167 21 61 41 9 2392.5
11/15/2019 2019 11 15 168 32 59 45.5 13.5 2406
11/16/2019 2019 11 16 169 27 66 46.5 14.5 2420.5
11/17/2019 2019 11 17 170 23 61 42 10 2430.5
11/18/2019 2019 11 18 171 27 61 44 12 2442.5
11/19/2019 2019 11 19 172 21 55 38 6 2448.5
11/20/2019 2019 11 20 173 45 54 49.5 17.5 2466
11/21/2019 2019 11 21 174 39 52 45.5 13.5 2479.5
11/22/2019 2019 11 22 175 32 52 42 10 2489.5
11/23/2019 2019 11 23 176 27 50 38.5 6.5 2496
11/24/2019 2019 11 24 177 25 48 36.5 4.5 2500.5
11/25/2019 2019 11 25 178 28 45 36.5 4.5 2505
11/26/2019 2019 11 26 179 27 41 34 2 2507
11/27/2019 2019 11 27 180 28 46 37 5 2512
11/28/2019 2019 11 28 181 41 52 46.5 14.5 2526.5
11/29/2019 2019 11 29 182 34 46 40 8 2534.5
11/30/2019 2019 11 30 183 25 41 33 1 2535.5
12/1/2019 2019 12 1 184 21 36 28.5 -3.5 2532
12/2/2019 2019 12 2 185 21 37 29 -3 2529
12/3/2019 2019 12 3 186 23 41 32 0 2529
12/4/2019 2019 12 4 187 27 43 35 3 2532
12/5/2019 2019 12 5 188 32 48 40 8 2540
12/6/2019 2019 12 6 189 32 46 39 7 2547
12/7/2019 2019 12 7 190 32 50 41 9 2556
12/8/2019 2019 12 8 191 34 54 44 12 2568
12/9/2019 2019 12 9 192 27 50 38.5 6.5 2574.5
12/10/2019 2019 12 10 193 21 46 33.5 1.5 2576
12/11/2019 2019 12 11 194 21 43 32 0 2576
12/12/2019 2019 12 12 195 23 45 34 2 2578
12/13/2019 2019 12 13 196 23 50 36.5 4.5 2582.5
12/14/2019 2019 12 14 197 25 50 37.5 5.5 2588
12/15/2019 2019 12 15 198 27 39 33 1 2589
12/16/2019 2019 12 16 199 18 37 27.5 -4.5 2584.5
12/17/2019 2019 12 17 200 10 36 23 -9 2575.5
12/18/2019 2019 12 18 201 10 34 22 -10 2565.5
12/19/2019 2019 12 19 202 10 37 23.5 -8.5 2557
12/20/2019 2019 12 20 203 10 43 26.5 -5.5 2551.5
12/21/2019 2019 12 21 204 16 37 26.5 -5.5 2546
12/22/2019 2019 12 22 205 21 43 32 0 2546
12/23/2019 2019 12 23 206 19 37 28 -4 2542
12/24/2019 2019 12 24 207 27 36 31.5 -0.5 2541.5
12/25/2019 2019 12 25 208 27 36 31.5 -0.5 2541
12/26/2019 2019 12 26 209 12 30 21 -11 2530
12/27/2019 2019 12 27 210 23 32 27.5 -4.5 2525.5
12/28/2019 2019 12 28 211 1 34 17.5 -14.5 2511
12/29/2019 2019 12 29 212 -6 27 10.5 -21.5 2489.5
12/30/2019 2019 12 30 213 9 28 18.5 -13.5 2476
12/31/2019 2019 12 31 214 -6 27 10.5 -21.5 2454.5
1/1/2020 2020 1 1 215 5 28 16.5 -15.5 2439
1/2/2020 2020 1 2 216 9 25 17 -15 2424
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
1/3/2020 2020 1 3 217 12 27 19.5 -12.5 2411.5
1/4/2020 2020 1 4 218 23 27 25 -7 2404.5
1/5/2020 2020 1 5 219 23 27 25 -7 2397.5
1/6/2020 2020 1 6 220 14 25 19.5 -12.5 2385
1/7/2020 2020 1 7 221 19 23 21 -11 2374
1/8/2020 2020 1 8 222 10 23 16.5 -15.5 2358.5
1/9/2020 2020 1 9 223 1 25 13 -19 2339.5
1/10/2020 2020 1 10 224 1 28 14.5 -17.5 2322
1/11/2020 2020 1 11 225 0 28 14 -18 2304
1/12/2020 2020 1 12 226 14 28 21 -11 2293
1/13/2020 2020 1 13 227 3 27 15 -17 2276
1/14/2020 2020 1 14 228 3 45 24 -8 2268
1/15/2020 2020 1 15 229 9 36 22.5 -9.5 2258.5
1/16/2020 2020 1 16 230 12 34 23 -9 2249.5
1/17/2020 2020 1 17 231 14 41 27.5 -4.5 2245
1/18/2020 2020 1 18 232 10 34 22 -10 2235
1/19/2020 2020 1 19 233 9 36 22.5 -9.5 2225.5
1/20/2020 2020 1 20 234 10 32 21 -11 2214.5
1/21/2020 2020 1 21 235 21 32 26.5 -5.5 2209
1/22/2020 2020 1 22 236 19 34 26.5 -5.5 2203.5
1/23/2020 2020 1 23 237 30 34 32 0 2203.5
1/24/2020 2020 1 24 238 28 32 30 -2 2201.5
1/25/2020 2020 1 25 239 27 32 29.5 -2.5 2199
1/26/2020 2020 1 26 240 28 32 30 -2 2197
1/27/2020 2020 1 27 241 28 48 38 6 2203
1/28/2020 2020 1 28 242 21 41 31 -1 2202
1/29/2020 2020 1 29 243 30 43 36.5 4.5 2206.5
1/30/2020 2020 1 30 244 25 45 35 3 2209.5
1/31/2020 2020 1 31 245 21 43 32 0 2209.5
2/1/2020 2020 2 1 246 21 45 33 1 2210.5
2/2/2020 2020 2 2 247 21 45 33 1 2211.5
2/3/2020 2020 2 3 248 23 50 36.5 4.5 2216
2/4/2020 2020 2 4 249 14 32 23 -9 2207
2/5/2020 2020 2 5 250 12 34 23 -9 2198
2/6/2020 2020 2 6 251 21 43 32 0 2198
2/7/2020 2020 2 7 252 30 61 45.5 13.5 2211.5
2/8/2020 2020 2 8 253 23 64 43.5 11.5 2223
2/9/2020 2020 2 9 254 28 43 35.5 3.5 2226.5
2/10/2020 2020 2 10 255 23 48 35.5 3.5 2230
2/11/2020 2020 2 11 256 16 43 29.5 -2.5 2227.5
2/12/2020 2020 2 12 257 14 52 33 1 2228.5
2/13/2020 2020 2 13 258 16 52 34 2 2230.5
2/14/2020 2020 2 14 259 18 55 36.5 4.5 2235
2/15/2020 2020 2 15 260 23 52 37.5 5.5 2240.5
2/16/2020 2020 2 16 261 21 59 40 8 2248.5
2/17/2020 2020 2 17 262 34 54 44 12 2260.5
2/18/2020 2020 2 18 263 19 43 31 -1 2259.5
2/19/2020 2020 2 19 264 14 50 32 0 2259.5
2/20/2020 2020 2 20 265 16 43 29.5 -2.5 2257
2/21/2020 2020 2 21 266 12 52 32 0 2257
2/22/2020 2020 2 22 267 23 50 36.5 4.5 2261.5
3/3/2020 2020 3 3 277 34 55 44.5 12.5 2274
3/4/2020 2020 3 4 278 25 61 43 11 2285
3/5/2020 2020 3 5 279 23 64 43.5 11.5 2296.5
3/6/2020 2020 3 6 280 28 64 46 14 2310.5
3/7/2020 2020 3 7 281 32 68 50 18 2328.5
3/8/2020 2020 3 8 282 32 61 46.5 14.5 2343
3/9/2020 2020 3 9 283 27 61 44 12 2355
3/10/2020 2020 3 10 284 36 61 48.5 16.5 2371.5
3/11/2020 2020 3 11 285 34 52 43 11 2382.5
5/27/2020 2020 5 27 362 70 91 80.5 48.5 2431
5/28/2020 2020 5 28 363 55 95 75 43 2474
5/29/2020 2020 5 29 364 57 97 77 45 2519
5/30/2020 2020 5 30 365 72 97 84.5 52.5 2571.5
5/31/2020 2020 5 31 366 63 90 76.5 44.5 2616
6/1/2020 2020 6 1 1 55 95 75 43 43
6/2/2020 2020 6 2 2 52 97 74.5 42.5 85.5
6/3/2020 2020 6 3 3 57 91 74 42 127.5
6/4/2020 2020 6 4 4 52 99 75.5 43.5 171
6/5/2020 2020 6 5 5 54 100 77 45 216
6/6/2020 2020 6 6 6 63 82 72.5 40.5 256.5
6/7/2020 2020 6 7 7 50 82 66 34 290.5
6/8/2020 2020 6 8 8 46 61 53.5 21.5 312
6/9/2020 2020 6 9 9 34 77 55.5 23.5 335.5
6/10/2020 2020 6 10 10 43 82 62.5 30.5 366
6/11/2020 2020 6 11 11 45 91 68 36 402
6/12/2020 2020 6 12 12 46 97 71.5 39.5 441.5
6/13/2020 2020 6 13 13 68 91 79.5 47.5 489
6/14/2020 2020 6 14 14 52 90 71 39 528
6/15/2020 2020 6 15 15 50 95 72.5 40.5 568.5
6/16/2020 2020 6 16 16 73 91 82 50 618.5
6/17/2020 2020 6 17 17 55 88 71.5 39.5 658
6/18/2020 2020 6 18 18 43 82 62.5 30.5 688.5
6/19/2020 2020 6 19 19 57 88 72.5 40.5 729
6/20/2020 2020 6 20 20 46 93 69.5 37.5 766.5
6/21/2020 2020 6 21 21 55 99 77 45 811.5
6/22/2020 2020 6 22 22 59 99 79 47 858.5
6/23/2020 2020 6 23 23 54 99 76.5 44.5 903
6/24/2020 2020 6 24 24 54 97 75.5 43.5 946.5
6/25/2020 2020 6 25 25 63 100 81.5 49.5 996
6/26/2020 2020 6 26 26 61 95 78 46 1042
6/27/2020 2020 6 27 27 54 97 75.5 43.5 1085.5
6/28/2020 2020 6 28 28 70 97 83.5 51.5 1137
6/29/2020 2020 6 29 29 61 81 71 39 1176
6/30/2020 2020 6 30 30 41 86 63.5 31.5 1207.5
7/1/2020 2020 7 1 31 46 91 68.5 36.5 1244
7/2/2020 2020 7 2 32 54 95 74.5 42.5 1286.5
7/3/2020 2020 7 3 33 55 95 75 43 1329.5
7/4/2020 2020 7 4 34 61 99 80 48 1377.5
7/5/2020 2020 7 5 35 63 100 81.5 49.5 1427
7/6/2020 2020 7 6 36 55 104 79.5 47.5 1474.5
7/7/2020 2020 7 7 37 59 99 79 47 1521.5
7/8/2020 2020 7 8 38 59 99 79 47 1568.5
7/9/2020 2020 7 9 39 54 99 76.5 44.5 1613
7/10/2020 2020 7 10 40 55 100 77.5 45.5 1658.5
7/11/2020 2020 7 11 41 55 106 80.5 48.5 1707
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
7/12/2020 2020 7 12 42 63 106 84.5 52.5 1759.5
7/13/2020 2020 7 13 43 68 104 86 54 1813.5
7/14/2020 2020 7 14 44 57 104 80.5 48.5 1862
7/15/2020 2020 7 15 45 64 100 82 50 1912
7/16/2020 2020 7 16 46 64 99 81.5 49.5 1961.5
7/17/2020 2020 7 17 47 64 99 81.5 49.5 2011
7/18/2020 2020 7 18 48 64 100 82 50 2061
7/19/2020 2020 7 19 49 59 104 81.5 49.5 2110.5
7/20/2020 2020 7 20 50 61 102 81.5 49.5 2160
7/21/2020 2020 7 21 51 61 100 80.5 48.5 2208.5
7/22/2020 2020 7 22 52 66 86 76 44 2252.5
7/23/2020 2020 7 23 53 63 86 74.5 42.5 2295
7/24/2020 2020 7 24 54 61 88 74.5 42.5 2337.5
7/25/2020 2020 7 25 55 59 91 75 43 2380.5
7/26/2020 2020 7 26 56 55 95 75 43 2423.5
7/27/2020 2020 7 27 57 63 95 79 47 2470.5
7/28/2020 2020 7 28 58 59 97 78 46 2516.5
7/29/2020 2020 7 29 59 63 102 82.5 50.5 2567
7/30/2020 2020 7 30 60 61 104 82.5 50.5 2617.5
7/31/2020 2020 7 31 61 59 106 82.5 50.5 2668
8/1/2020 2020 8 1 62 64 104 84 52 2720
8/2/2020 2020 8 2 63 66 106 86 54 2774
8/3/2020 2020 8 3 64 68 106 87 55 2829
8/4/2020 2020 8 4 65 63 100 81.5 49.5 2878.5
8/5/2020 2020 8 5 66 63 99 81 49 2927.5
8/6/2020 2020 8 6 67 61 97 79 47 2974.5
8/7/2020 2020 8 7 68 52 97 74.5 42.5 3017
8/8/2020 2020 8 8 69 52 97 74.5 42.5 3059.5
8/9/2020 2020 8 9 70 52 97 74.5 42.5 3102
8/10/2020 2020 8 10 71 52 100 76 44 3146
8/11/2020 2020 8 11 72 59 99 79 47 3193
8/12/2020 2020 8 12 73 57 100 78.5 46.5 3239.5
8/13/2020 2020 8 13 74 52 99 75.5 43.5 3283
8/14/2020 2020 8 14 75 59 100 79.5 47.5 3330.5
8/15/2020 2020 8 15 76 57 100 78.5 46.5 3377
8/16/2020 2020 8 16 77 57 102 79.5 47.5 3424.5
8/17/2020 2020 8 17 78 59 102 80.5 48.5 3473
8/18/2020 2020 8 18 79 54 106 80 48 3521
8/19/2020 2020 8 19 80 59 106 82.5 50.5 3571.5
8/20/2020 2020 8 20 81 64 104 84 52 3623.5
8/21/2020 2020 8 21 82 68 102 85 53 3676.5
8/22/2020 2020 8 22 83 64 104 84 52 3728.5
8/23/2020 2020 8 23 84 64 100 82 50 3778.5
8/24/2020 2020 8 24 85 70 100 85 53 3831.5
8/25/2020 2020 8 25 86 72 100 86 54 3885.5
8/26/2020 2020 8 26 87 68 100 84 52 3937.5
8/27/2020 2020 8 27 88 68 100 84 52 3989.5
8/28/2020 2020 8 28 89 70 97 83.5 51.5 4041
8/29/2020 2020 8 29 90 70 95 82.5 50.5 4091.5
8/30/2020 2020 8 30 91 61 95 78 46 4137.5
8/31/2020 2020 8 31 92 54 95 74.5 42.5 4180
9/1/2020 2020 9 1 93 61 86 73.5 41.5 4221.5
9/2/2020 2020 9 2 94 48 93 70.5 38.5 4260
9/3/2020 2020 9 3 95 46 97 71.5 39.5 4299.5
9/4/2020 2020 9 4 96 50 99 74.5 42.5 4342
9/5/2020 2020 9 5 97 48 100 74 42 4384
9/6/2020 2020 9 6 98 52 102 77 45 4429
9/7/2020 2020 9 7 99 54 95 74.5 42.5 4471.5
9/8/2020 2020 9 8 100 45 77 61 29 4500.5
9/9/2020 2020 9 9 101 41 59 50 18 4518.5
9/10/2020 2020 9 10 102 50 68 59 27 4545.5
9/11/2020 2020 9 11 103 41 79 60 28 4573.5
9/12/2020 2020 9 12 104 39 86 62.5 30.5 4604
9/13/2020 2020 9 13 105 41 90 65.5 33.5 4637.5
9/14/2020 2020 9 14 106 43 90 66.5 34.5 4672
9/15/2020 2020 9 15 107 45 90 67.5 35.5 4707.5
9/16/2020 2020 9 16 108 45 91 68 36 4743.5
9/17/2020 2020 9 17 109 43 90 66.5 34.5 4778
9/18/2020 2020 9 18 110 43 91 67 35 4813
9/19/2020 2020 9 19 111 59 91 75 43 4856
9/20/2020 2020 9 20 112 46 90 68 36 4892
9/21/2020 2020 9 21 113 48 90 69 37 4929
9/22/2020 2020 9 22 114 54 81 67.5 35.5 4964.5
9/23/2020 2020 9 23 115 46 88 67 35 4999.5
9/24/2020 2020 9 24 116 45 93 69 37 5036.5
9/25/2020 2020 9 25 117 52 95 73.5 41.5 5078
9/26/2020 2020 9 26 118 48 91 69.5 37.5 5115.5
9/27/2020 2020 9 27 119 55 81 68 36 5151.5
9/28/2020 2020 9 28 120 41 72 56.5 24.5 5176
9/29/2020 2020 9 29 121 34 79 56.5 24.5 5200.5
9/30/2020 2020 9 30 122 36 86 61 29 5229.5
10/1/2020 2020 10 1 123 37 86 61.5 29.5 5259
10/2/2020 2020 10 2 124 36 82 59 27 5286
10/3/2020 2020 10 3 125 37 84 60.5 28.5 5314.5
10/4/2020 2020 10 4 126 39 86 62.5 30.5 5345
10/5/2020 2020 10 5 127 36 86 61 29 5374
10/6/2020 2020 10 6 128 36 82 59 27 5401
10/7/2020 2020 10 7 129 34 82 58 26 5427
10/8/2020 2020 10 8 130 37 86 61.5 29.5 5456.5
10/9/2020 2020 10 9 131 43 84 63.5 31.5 5488
10/10/2020 2020 10 10 132 43 84 63.5 31.5 5519.5
10/11/2020 2020 10 11 133 46 77 61.5 29.5 5549
10/12/2020 2020 10 12 134 32 77 54.5 22.5 5571.5
10/13/2020 2020 10 13 135 32 81 56.5 24.5 5596
10/14/2020 2020 10 14 136 37 86 61.5 29.5 5625.5
10/15/2020 2020 10 15 137 50 72 61 29 5654.5
10/16/2020 2020 10 16 138 32 72 52 20 5674.5
10/17/2020 2020 10 17 139 32 81 56.5 24.5 5699
10/18/2020 2020 10 18 140 41 81 61 29 5728
10/19/2020 2020 10 19 141 37 81 59 27 5755
10/20/2020 2020 10 20 142 36 81 58.5 26.5 5781.5
10/21/2020 2020 10 21 143 34 82 58 26 5807.5
10/22/2020 2020 10 22 144 43 82 62.5 30.5 5838
10/23/2020 2020 10 23 145 34 64 49 17 5855
10/24/2020 2020 10 24 146 27 79 53 21 5876
10/25/2020 2020 10 25 147 30 68 49 17 5893
10/26/2020 2020 10 26 148 19 37 28 -4 5889
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
10/27/2020 2020 10 27 149 10 48 29 -3 5886
10/28/2020 2020 10 28 150 19 59 39 7 5893
10/29/2020 2020 10 29 151 23 64 43.5 11.5 5904.5
10/30/2020 2020 10 30 152 27 64 45.5 13.5 5918
10/31/2020 2020 10 31 153 23 68 45.5 13.5 5931.5
11/1/2020 2020 11 1 154 27 68 47.5 15.5 5947
11/2/2020 2020 11 2 155 27 68 47.5 15.5 5962.5
11/3/2020 2020 11 3 156 36 70 53 21 5983.5
11/4/2020 2020 11 4 157 32 72 52 20 6003.5
11/5/2020 2020 11 5 158 32 72 52 20 6023.5
11/6/2020 2020 11 6 159 36 68 52 20 6043.5
11/7/2020 2020 11 7 160 41 70 55.5 23.5 6067
11/8/2020 2020 11 8 161 36 48 42 10 6077
11/9/2020 2020 11 9 162 21 41 31 -1 6076
11/10/2020 2020 11 10 163 14 43 28.5 -3.5 6072.5
11/11/2020 2020 11 11 164 12 50 31 -1 6071.5
11/12/2020 2020 11 12 165 14 50 32 0 6071.5
11/13/2020 2020 11 13 166 14 55 34.5 2.5 6074
11/14/2020 2020 11 14 167 25 55 40 8 6082
11/15/2020 2020 11 15 168 16 55 35.5 3.5 6085.5
11/16/2020 2020 11 16 169 19 55 37 5 6090.5
11/17/2020 2020 11 17 170 19 55 37 5 6095.5
11/18/2020 2020 11 18 171 32 72 52 20 6115.5
11/19/2020 2020 11 19 172 41 68 54.5 22.5 6138
11/20/2020 2020 11 20 173 23 61 42 10 6148
11/21/2020 2020 11 21 174 27 61 44 12 6160
11/22/2020 2020 11 22 175 19 52 35.5 3.5 6163.5
11/23/2020 2020 11 23 176 18 54 36 4 6167.5
11/24/2020 2020 11 24 177 21 52 36.5 4.5 6172
11/25/2020 2020 11 25 178 12 52 32 0 6172
11/26/2020 2020 11 26 179 18 46 32 0 6172
11/27/2020 2020 11 27 180 9 45 27 -5 6167
11/28/2020 2020 11 28 181 9 46 27.5 -4.5 6162.5
11/29/2020 2020 11 29 182 10 50 30 -2 6160.5
11/30/2020 2020 11 30 183 7 45 26 -6 6154.5
12/1/2020 2020 12 1 184 10 50 30 -2 6152.5
12/2/2020 2020 12 2 185 10 43 26.5 -5.5 6147
12/3/2020 2020 12 3 186 1 43 22 -10 6137
12/4/2020 2020 12 4 187 3 45 24 -8 6129
12/5/2020 2020 12 5 188 9 50 29.5 -2.5 6126.5
12/6/2020 2020 12 6 189 7 48 27.5 -4.5 6122
12/7/2020 2020 12 7 190 7 50 28.5 -3.5 6118.5
12/8/2020 2020 12 8 191 9 50 29.5 -2.5 6116
12/9/2020 2020 12 9 192 9 46 27.5 -4.5 6111.5
12/10/2020 2020 12 10 193 18 41 29.5 -2.5 6109
12/11/2020 2020 12 11 194 10 46 28 -4 6105
12/12/2020 2020 12 12 195 19 41 30 -2 6103
12/13/2020 2020 12 13 196 1 36 18.5 -13.5 6089.5
12/14/2020 2020 12 14 197 19 32 25.5 -6.5 6083
12/15/2020 2020 12 15 198 10 41 25.5 -6.5 6076.5
12/16/2020 2020 12 16 199 7 39 23 -9 6067.5
12/17/2020 2020 12 17 200 10 34 22 -10 6057.5
12/18/2020 2020 12 18 201 9 45 27 -5 6052.5
12/19/2020 2020 12 19 202 10 37 23.5 -8.5 6044
12/20/2020 2020 12 20 203 7 39 23 -9 6035
12/21/2020 2020 12 21 204 10 43 26.5 -5.5 6029.5
12/22/2020 2020 12 22 205 10 50 30 -2 6027.5
12/23/2020 2020 12 23 206 9 39 24 -8 6019.5
12/24/2020 2020 12 24 207 1 37 19 -13 6006.5
12/25/2020 2020 12 25 208 3 37 20 -12 5994.5
12/26/2020 2020 12 26 209 7 39 23 -9 5985.5
12/27/2020 2020 12 27 210 9 36 22.5 -9.5 5976
12/28/2020 2020 12 28 211 23 32 27.5 -4.5 5971.5
12/29/2020 2020 12 29 212 9 32 20.5 -11.5 5960
12/30/2020 2020 12 30 213 7 27 17 -15 5945
12/31/2020 2020 12 31 214 3 30 16.5 -15.5 5929.5
1/1/2021 2021 1 1 215 1 34 17.5 -14.5 5915
1/2/2021 2021 1 2 216 3 32 17.5 -14.5 5900.5
1/3/2021 2021 1 3 217 10 18 14 -18 5882.5
1/4/2021 2021 1 4 218 7 34 20.5 -11.5 5871
1/5/2021 2021 1 5 219 9 43 26 -6 5865
1/6/2021 2021 1 6 220 9 39 24 -8 5857
1/7/2021 2021 1 7 221 9 39 24 -8 5849
1/8/2021 2021 1 8 222 9 37 23 -9 5840
1/9/2021 2021 1 9 223 18 43 30.5 -1.5 5838.5
1/10/2021 2021 1 10 224 9 37 23 -9 5829.5
1/11/2021 2021 1 11 225 5 37 21 -11 5818.5
1/12/2021 2021 1 12 226 5 34 19.5 -12.5 5806
1/13/2021 2021 1 13 227 10 36 23 -9 5797
1/14/2021 2021 1 14 228 12 45 28.5 -3.5 5793.5
1/15/2021 2021 1 15 229 12 45 28.5 -3.5 5790
1/16/2021 2021 1 16 230 18 52 35 3 5793
1/17/2021 2021 1 17 231 14 50 32 0 5793
1/18/2021 2021 1 18 232 19 46 32.5 0.5 5793.5
1/19/2021 2021 1 19 233 23 41 32 0 5793.5
1/20/2021 2021 1 20 234 23 46 34.5 2.5 5796
1/21/2021 2021 1 21 235 12 46 29 -3 5793
1/22/2021 2021 1 22 236 19 43 31 -1 5792
1/23/2021 2021 1 23 237 27 48 37.5 5.5 5797.5
1/24/2021 2021 1 24 238 19 41 30 -2 5795.5
1/25/2021 2021 1 25 239 18 41 29.5 -2.5 5793
1/26/2021 2021 1 26 240 14 36 25 -7 5786
1/27/2021 2021 1 27 241 14 36 25 -7 5779
1/28/2021 2021 1 28 242 27 45 36 4 5783
1/29/2021 2021 1 29 243 18 46 32 0 5783
1/30/2021 2021 1 30 244 18 50 34 2 5785
1/31/2021 2021 1 31 245 14 45 29.5 -2.5 5782.5
2/1/2021 2021 2 1 246 23 43 33 1 5783.5
2/2/2021 2021 2 2 247 27 52 39.5 7.5 5791
2/3/2021 2021 2 3 248 19 63 41 9 5800
2/4/2021 2021 2 4 249 18 45 31.5 -0.5 5799.5
2/5/2021 2021 2 5 250 19 55 37 5 5804.5
2/6/2021 2021 2 6 251 23 55 39 7 5811.5
2/7/2021 2021 2 7 252 18 61 39.5 7.5 5819
2/8/2021 2021 2 8 253 14 63 38.5 6.5 5825.5
2/9/2021 2021 2 9 254 32 59 45.5 13.5 5839
2/10/2021 2021 2 10 255 32 59 45.5 13.5 5852.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
2/11/2021 2021 2 11 256 18 59 38.5 6.5 5859
2/12/2021 2021 2 12 257 32 55 43.5 11.5 5870.5
2/13/2021 2021 2 13 258 32 45 38.5 6.5 5877
2/14/2021 2021 2 14 259 27 41 34 2 5879
2/15/2021 2021 2 15 260 21 41 31 -1 5878
2/16/2021 2021 2 16 261 19 50 34.5 2.5 5880.5
2/17/2021 2021 2 17 262 32 43 37.5 5.5 5886
2/18/2021 2021 2 18 263 14 43 28.5 -3.5 5882.5
2/19/2021 2021 2 19 264 23 52 37.5 5.5 5888
2/20/2021 2021 2 20 265 18 52 35 3 5891
2/21/2021 2021 2 21 266 27 50 38.5 6.5 5897.5
2/22/2021 2021 2 22 267 18 54 36 4 5901.5
2/23/2021 2021 2 23 268 18 55 36.5 4.5 5906
2/24/2021 2021 2 24 269 12 55 33.5 1.5 5907.5
2/25/2021 2021 2 25 270 27 46 36.5 4.5 5912
2/26/2021 2021 2 26 271 14 57 35.5 3.5 5915.5
2/27/2021 2021 2 27 272 25 41 33 1 5916.5
2/28/2021 2021 2 28 273 9 43 26 -6 5910.5
3/1/2021 2021 3 1 274 10 50 30 -2 5908.5
3/2/2021 2021 3 2 275 10 54 32 0 5908.5
3/3/2021 2021 3 3 276 12 61 36.5 4.5 5913
3/4/2021 2021 3 4 277 34 59 46.5 14.5 5927.5
3/5/2021 2021 3 5 278 21 63 42 10 5937.5
3/6/2021 2021 3 6 279 21 68 44.5 12.5 5950
3/7/2021 2021 3 7 280 28 72 50 18 5968
3/8/2021 2021 3 8 281 43 72 57.5 25.5 5993.5
3/9/2021 2021 3 9 282 45 61 53 21 6014.5
3/10/2021 2021 3 10 283 34 52 43 11 6025.5
3/11/2021 2021 3 11 284 36 48 42 10 6035.5
3/12/2021 2021 3 12 285 32 45 38.5 6.5 6042
3/13/2021 2021 3 13 286 30 48 39 7 6049
3/14/2021 2021 3 14 287 34 57 45.5 13.5 6062.5
3/15/2021 2021 3 15 288 30 61 45.5 13.5 6076
3/16/2021 2021 3 16 289 36 52 44 12 6088
3/17/2021 2021 3 17 290 27 59 43 11 6099
3/18/2021 2021 3 18 291 30 64 47 15 6114
3/19/2021 2021 3 19 292 28 72 50 18 6132
3/20/2021 2021 3 20 293 43 70 56.5 24.5 6156.5
3/21/2021 2021 3 21 294 32 54 43 11 6167.5
3/22/2021 2021 3 22 295 34 59 46.5 14.5 6182
3/23/2021 2021 3 23 296 28 52 40 8 6190
3/24/2021 2021 3 24 297 34 55 44.5 12.5 6202.5
3/25/2021 2021 3 25 298 32 52 42 10 6212.5
3/26/2021 2021 3 26 299 30 52 41 9 6221.5
3/27/2021 2021 3 27 300 19 61 40 8 6229.5
3/28/2021 2021 3 28 301 23 70 46.5 14.5 6244
3/29/2021 2021 3 29 302 32 77 54.5 22.5 6266.5
3/30/2021 2021 3 30 303 30 52 41 9 6275.5
3/31/2021 2021 3 31 304 19 57 38 6 6281.5
4/1/2021 2021 4 1 305 18 68 43 11 6292.5
4/2/2021 2021 4 2 306 36 77 56.5 24.5 6317
4/3/2021 2021 4 3 307 34 82 58 26 6343
4/4/2021 2021 4 4 308 41 84 62.5 30.5 6373.5
4/5/2021 2021 4 5 309 45 82 63.5 31.5 6405
4/6/2021 2021 4 6 310 41 61 51 19 6424
4/7/2021 2021 4 7 311 27 70 48.5 16.5 6440.5
4/8/2021 2021 4 8 312 30 75 52.5 20.5 6461
4/9/2021 2021 4 9 313 43 72 57.5 25.5 6486.5
4/10/2021 2021 4 10 314 30 75 52.5 20.5 6507
4/11/2021 2021 4 11 315 32 73 52.5 20.5 6527.5
4/12/2021 2021 4 12 316 32 70 51 19 6546.5
4/13/2021 2021 4 13 317 45 70 57.5 25.5 6572
4/14/2021 2021 4 14 318 34 72 53 21 6593
4/15/2021 2021 4 15 319 36 59 47.5 15.5 6608.5
4/16/2021 2021 4 16 320 30 55 42.5 10.5 6619
4/17/2021 2021 4 17 321 34 59 46.5 14.5 6633.5
4/18/2021 2021 4 18 322 25 64 44.5 12.5 6646
4/19/2021 2021 4 19 323 28 77 52.5 20.5 6666.5
4/20/2021 2021 4 20 324 32 59 45.5 13.5 6680
4/21/2021 2021 4 21 325 39 70 54.5 22.5 6702.5
4/22/2021 2021 4 22 326 37 70 53.5 21.5 6724
4/23/2021 2021 4 23 327 32 72 52 20 6744
4/24/2021 2021 4 24 328 30 77 53.5 21.5 6765.5
4/25/2021 2021 4 25 329 63 81 72 40 6805.5
4/26/2021 2021 4 26 330 50 70 60 28 6833.5
4/27/2021 2021 4 27 331 43 59 51 19 6852.5
4/28/2021 2021 4 28 332 37 70 53.5 21.5 6874
4/29/2021 2021 4 29 333 41 77 59 27 6901
4/30/2021 2021 4 30 334 46 84 65 33 6934
5/1/2021 2021 5 1 335 50 90 70 38 6972
5/2/2021 2021 5 2 336 50 77 63.5 31.5 7003.5
5/3/2021 2021 5 3 337 48 70 59 27 7030.5
5/4/2021 2021 5 4 338 43 75 59 27 7057.5
5/5/2021 2021 5 5 339 41 81 61 29 7086.5
5/6/2021 2021 5 6 340 41 88 64.5 32.5 7119
5/7/2021 2021 5 7 341 46 88 67 35 7154
5/8/2021 2021 5 8 342 55 73 64 32 7186
5/9/2021 2021 5 9 343 43 70 56.5 24.5 7210.5
5/10/2021 2021 5 10 344 46 68 57 25 7235.5
5/11/2021 2021 5 11 345 34 70 52 20 7255.5
5/12/2021 2021 5 12 346 36 77 56.5 24.5 7280
5/13/2021 2021 5 13 347 39 88 63.5 31.5 7311.5
5/14/2021 2021 5 14 348 45 90 67.5 35.5 7347
5/15/2021 2021 5 15 349 46 88 67 35 7382
5/16/2021 2021 5 16 350 46 82 64 32 7414
5/17/2021 2021 5 17 351 45 81 63 31 7445
5/18/2021 2021 5 18 352 55 84 69.5 37.5 7482.5
5/19/2021 2021 5 19 353 48 88 68 36 7518.5
5/20/2021 2021 5 20 354 57 88 72.5 40.5 7559
5/21/2021 2021 5 21 355 55 77 66 34 7593
5/22/2021 2021 5 22 356 37 72 54.5 22.5 7615.5
5/23/2021 2021 5 23 357 46 68 57 25 7640.5
5/24/2021 2021 5 24 358 37 73 55 23 7663.5
5/25/2021 2021 5 25 359 39 82 60.5 28.5 7692
5/26/2021 2021 5 26 360 55 84 69.5 37.5 7729.5
5/27/2021 2021 5 27 361 45 88 66.5 34.5 7764
5/28/2021 2021 5 28 362 48 91 69.5 37.5 7801.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
5/29/2021 2021 5 29 363 52 90 71 39 7840.5
5/30/2021 2021 5 30 364 55 86 70.5 38.5 7879
5/31/2021 2021 5 31 365 57 86 71.5 39.5 7918.5
6/1/2021 2021 6 1 1 52 90 71 39 39
6/2/2021 2021 6 2 2 52 95 73.5 41.5 80.5
6/3/2021 2021 6 3 3 54 97 75.5 43.5 124
6/4/2021 2021 6 4 4 63 100 81.5 49.5 173.5
6/5/2021 2021 6 5 5 63 99 81 49 222.5
6/6/2021 2021 6 6 6 61 99 80 48 270.5
6/7/2021 2021 6 7 7 61 95 78 46 316.5
6/8/2021 2021 6 8 8 59 90 74.5 42.5 359
6/9/2021 2021 6 9 9 55 91 73 41 400
6/10/2021 2021 6 10 10 61 91 76 44 444
6/11/2021 2021 6 11 11 45 88 66.5 34.5 478.5
6/12/2021 2021 6 12 12 46 97 71.5 39.5 518
6/13/2021 2021 6 13 13 52 100 76 44 562
6/14/2021 2021 6 14 14 55 104 79.5 47.5 609.5
6/15/2021 2021 6 15 15 61 106 83.5 51.5 661
6/16/2021 2021 6 16 16 63 106 84.5 52.5 713.5
6/17/2021 2021 6 17 17 77 104 90.5 58.5 772
6/18/2021 2021 6 18 18 75 100 87.5 55.5 827.5
6/19/2021 2021 6 19 19 68 99 83.5 51.5 879
6/20/2021 2021 6 20 20 63 102 82.5 50.5 929.5
6/21/2021 2021 6 21 21 59 102 80.5 48.5 978
6/22/2021 2021 6 22 22 66 102 84 52 1030
6/23/2021 2021 6 23 23 72 91 81.5 49.5 1079.5
6/24/2021 2021 6 24 24 64 82 73 41 1120.5
6/25/2021 2021 6 25 25 54 90 72 40 1160.5
6/26/2021 2021 6 26 26 61 88 74.5 42.5 1203
6/27/2021 2021 6 27 27 64 90 77 45 1248
6/28/2021 2021 6 28 28 61 90 75.5 43.5 1291.5
6/29/2021 2021 6 29 29 64 86 75 43 1334.5
6/30/2021 2021 6 30 30 63 86 74.5 42.5 1377
7/1/2021 2021 7 1 31 61 95 78 46 1423
7/2/2021 2021 7 2 32 61 99 80 48 1471
7/3/2021 2021 7 3 33 70 100 85 53 1524
7/4/2021 2021 7 4 34 63 104 83.5 51.5 1575.5
7/5/2021 2021 7 5 35 75 97 86 54 1629.5
7/6/2021 2021 7 6 36 64 100 82 50 1679.5
7/7/2021 2021 7 7 37 63 104 83.5 51.5 1731
7/8/2021 2021 7 8 38 73 108 90.5 58.5 1789.5
7/9/2021 2021 7 9 39 64 109 86.5 54.5 1844
7/10/2021 2021 7 10 40 66 106 86 54 1898
7/11/2021 2021 7 11 41 63 106 84.5 52.5 1950.5
7/12/2021 2021 7 12 42 64 104 84 52 2002.5
7/13/2021 2021 7 13 43 68 100 84 52 2054.5
7/14/2021 2021 7 14 44 64 91 77.5 45.5 2100
7/15/2021 2021 7 15 45 63 97 80 48 2148
7/16/2021 2021 7 16 46 68 99 83.5 51.5 2199.5
7/17/2021 2021 7 17 47 68 100 84 52 2251.5
7/18/2021 2021 7 18 48 73 104 88.5 56.5 2308
7/19/2021 2021 7 19 49 77 97 87 55 2363
7/20/2021 2021 7 20 50 68 97 82.5 50.5 2413.5
7/21/2021 2021 7 21 51 66 97 81.5 49.5 2463
7/22/2021 2021 7 22 52 68 99 83.5 51.5 2514.5
7/23/2021 2021 7 23 53 68 97 82.5 50.5 2565
7/24/2021 2021 7 24 54 70 91 80.5 48.5 2613.5
7/25/2021 2021 7 25 55 72 93 82.5 50.5 2664
7/26/2021 2021 7 26 56 70 91 80.5 48.5 2712.5
7/27/2021 2021 7 27 57 68 91 79.5 47.5 2760
7/28/2021 2021 7 28 58 70 95 82.5 50.5 2810.5
7/29/2021 2021 7 29 59 66 97 81.5 49.5 2860
7/30/2021 2021 7 30 60 66 90 78 46 2906
7/31/2021 2021 7 31 61 70 91 80.5 48.5 2954.5
8/1/2021 2021 8 1 62 63 91 77 45 2999.5
8/2/2021 2021 8 2 63 63 84 73.5 41.5 3041
8/3/2021 2021 8 3 64 64 97 80.5 48.5 3089.5
8/4/2021 2021 8 4 65 63 95 79 47 3136.5
8/5/2021 2021 8 5 66 63 99 81 49 3185.5
8/6/2021 2021 8 6 67 66 100 83 51 3236.5
8/7/2021 2021 8 7 68 63 91 77 45 3281.5
8/8/2021 2021 8 8 69 57 97 77 45 3326.5
8/9/2021 2021 8 9 70 61 99 80 48 3374.5
8/10/2021 2021 8 10 71 63 99 81 49 3423.5
8/11/2021 2021 8 11 72 64 99 81.5 49.5 3473
8/12/2021 2021 8 12 73 57 99 78 46 3519
8/13/2021 2021 8 13 74 59 100 79.5 47.5 3566.5
8/14/2021 2021 8 14 75 70 99 84.5 52.5 3619
8/15/2021 2021 8 15 76 68 99 83.5 51.5 3670.5
8/16/2021 2021 8 16 77 64 97 80.5 48.5 3719
8/17/2021 2021 8 17 78 64 99 81.5 49.5 3768.5
8/18/2021 2021 8 18 79 63 88 75.5 43.5 3812
8/19/2021 2021 8 19 80 55 63 59 27 3839
8/23/2021 2021 8 23 84 68 91 79.5 47.5 3886.5
8/24/2021 2021 8 24 85 57 93 75 43 3929.5
8/25/2021 2021 8 25 86 55 95 75 43 3972.5
8/26/2021 2021 8 26 87 64 91 77.5 45.5 4018
8/27/2021 2021 8 27 88 55 97 76 44 4062
8/28/2021 2021 8 28 89 54 97 75.5 43.5 4105.5
8/29/2021 2021 8 29 90 55 97 76 44 4149.5
8/30/2021 2021 8 30 91 61 97 79 47 4196.5
8/31/2021 2021 8 31 92 64 91 77.5 45.5 4242
9/1/2021 2021 9 1 93 61 68 64.5 32.5 4274.5
9/2/2021 2021 9 2 94 57 79 68 36 4310.5
9/3/2021 2021 9 3 95 59 82 70.5 38.5 4349
9/4/2021 2021 9 4 96 55 88 71.5 39.5 4388.5
9/5/2021 2021 9 5 97 55 90 72.5 40.5 4429
9/6/2021 2021 9 6 98 54 91 72.5 40.5 4469.5
9/7/2021 2021 9 7 99 54 93 73.5 41.5 4511
9/8/2021 2021 9 8 100 52 95 73.5 41.5 4552.5
9/9/2021 2021 9 9 101 54 97 75.5 43.5 4596
9/10/2021 2021 9 10 102 59 99 79 47 4643
9/11/2021 2021 9 11 103 59 91 75 43 4686
9/12/2021 2021 9 12 104 59 88 73.5 41.5 4727.5
9/13/2021 2021 9 13 105 57 93 75 43 4770.5
9/14/2021 2021 9 14 106 54 91 72.5 40.5 4811
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
9/15/2021 2021 9 15 107 52 91 71.5 39.5 4850.5
9/16/2021 2021 9 16 108 52 90 71 39 4889.5
9/17/2021 2021 9 17 109 50 90 70 38 4927.5
9/18/2021 2021 9 18 110 59 86 72.5 40.5 4968
9/19/2021 2021 9 19 111 59 84 71.5 39.5 5007.5
9/20/2021 2021 9 20 112 52 73 62.5 30.5 5038
9/21/2021 2021 9 21 113 41 73 57 25 5063
9/22/2021 2021 9 22 114 39 81 60 28 5091
9/23/2021 2021 9 23 115 45 82 63.5 31.5 5122.5
9/24/2021 2021 9 24 116 45 84 64.5 32.5 5155
9/25/2021 2021 9 25 117 43 88 65.5 33.5 5188.5
9/26/2021 2021 9 26 118 52 81 66.5 34.5 5223
9/27/2021 2021 9 27 119 50 82 66 34 5257
9/28/2021 2021 9 28 120 57 81 69 37 5294
9/29/2021 2021 9 29 121 52 64 58 26 5320
9/30/2021 2021 9 30 122 39 64 51.5 19.5 5339.5
10/1/2021 2021 10 1 123 54 72 63 31 5370.5
10/2/2021 2021 10 2 124 43 77 60 28 5398.5
10/3/2021 2021 10 3 125 45 79 62 30 5428.5
10/4/2021 2021 10 4 126 43 81 62 30 5458.5
10/5/2021 2021 10 5 127 46 63 54.5 22.5 5481
10/6/2021 2021 10 6 128 48 73 60.5 28.5 5509.5
10/7/2021 2021 10 7 129 43 73 58 26 5535.5
10/8/2021 2021 10 8 130 50 68 59 27 5562.5
10/9/2021 2021 10 9 131 41 66 53.5 21.5 5584
10/10/2021 2021 10 10 132 34 66 50 18 5602
10/11/2021 2021 10 11 133 36 70 53 21 5623
10/12/2021 2021 10 12 134 37 52 44.5 12.5 5635.5
10/13/2021 2021 10 13 135 32 54 43 11 5646.5
10/14/2021 2021 10 14 136 34 55 44.5 12.5 5659
10/15/2021 2021 10 15 137 28 54 41 9 5668
10/16/2021 2021 10 16 138 30 61 45.5 13.5 5681.5
10/17/2021 2021 10 17 139 30 63 46.5 14.5 5696
10/18/2021 2021 10 18 140 34 68 51 19 5715
10/19/2021 2021 10 19 141 32 57 44.5 12.5 5727.5
10/20/2021 2021 10 20 142 32 59 45.5 13.5 5741
10/21/2021 2021 10 21 143 32 64 48 16 5757
10/22/2021 2021 10 22 144 32 66 49 17 5774
10/23/2021 2021 10 23 145 36 70 53 21 5795
10/24/2021 2021 10 24 146 37 70 53.5 21.5 5816.5
10/25/2021 2021 10 25 147 57 77 67 35 5851.5
10/26/2021 2021 10 26 148 36 66 51 19 5870.5
10/27/2021 2021 10 27 149 32 59 45.5 13.5 5884
10/28/2021 2021 10 28 150 34 63 48.5 16.5 5900.5
10/29/2021 2021 10 29 151 34 63 48.5 16.5 5917
10/30/2021 2021 10 30 152 32 64 48 16 5933
10/31/2021 2021 10 31 153 41 66 53.5 21.5 5954.5
11/1/2021 2021 11 1 154 36 66 51 19 5973.5
11/2/2021 2021 11 2 155 43 68 55.5 23.5 5997
11/3/2021 2021 11 3 156 34 63 48.5 16.5 6013.5
11/4/2021 2021 11 4 157 32 63 47.5 15.5 6029
11/5/2021 2021 11 5 158 30 64 47 15 6044
11/6/2021 2021 11 6 159 32 70 51 19 6063
11/7/2021 2021 11 7 160 41 73 57 25 6088
11/8/2021 2021 11 8 161 41 70 55.5 23.5 6111.5
11/9/2021 2021 11 9 162 36 59 47.5 15.5 6127
11/10/2021 2021 11 10 163 34 61 47.5 15.5 6142.5
11/11/2021 2021 11 11 164 28 59 43.5 11.5 6154
11/12/2021 2021 11 12 165 32 63 47.5 15.5 6169.5
11/13/2021 2021 11 13 166 28 59 43.5 11.5 6181
11/14/2021 2021 11 14 167 28 61 44.5 12.5 6193.5
11/15/2021 2021 11 15 168 28 61 44.5 12.5 6206
11/16/2021 2021 11 16 169 32 63 47.5 15.5 6221.5
11/17/2021 2021 11 17 170 28 57 42.5 10.5 6232
11/18/2021 2021 11 18 171 21 50 35.5 3.5 6235.5
11/19/2021 2021 11 19 172 28 59 43.5 11.5 6247
11/20/2021 2021 11 20 173 30 59 44.5 12.5 6259.5
11/21/2021 2021 11 21 174 21 52 36.5 4.5 6264
11/22/2021 2021 11 22 175 18 52 35 3 6267
11/23/2021 2021 11 23 176 21 46 33.5 1.5 6268.5
11/24/2021 2021 11 24 177 18 50 34 2 6270.5
11/25/2021 2021 11 25 178 12 46 29 -3 6267.5
11/26/2021 2021 11 26 179 16 48 32 0 6267.5
11/27/2021 2021 11 27 180 16 52 34 2 6269.5
11/28/2021 2021 11 28 181 19 55 37 5 6274.5
11/29/2021 2021 11 29 182 21 55 38 6 6280.5
11/30/2021 2021 11 30 183 19 57 38 6 6286.5
12/1/2021 2021 12 1 184 21 57 39 7 6293.5
12/2/2021 2021 12 2 185 23 57 40 8 6301.5
12/3/2021 2021 12 3 186 21 55 38 6 6307.5
12/4/2021 2021 12 4 187 21 54 37.5 5.5 6313
12/5/2021 2021 12 5 188 19 55 37 5 6318
12/6/2021 2021 12 6 189 21 54 37.5 5.5 6323.5
12/7/2021 2021 12 7 190 32 52 42 10 6333.5
12/8/2021 2021 12 8 191 27 48 37.5 5.5 6339
12/9/2021 2021 12 9 192 32 50 41 9 6348
12/10/2021 2021 12 10 193 14 41 27.5 -4.5 6343.5
12/11/2021 2021 12 11 194 9 36 22.5 -9.5 6334
12/12/2021 2021 12 12 195 9 37 23 -9 6325
12/13/2021 2021 12 13 196 12 39 25.5 -6.5 6318.5
12/14/2021 2021 12 14 197 23 54 38.5 6.5 6325
12/15/2021 2021 12 15 198 21 48 34.5 2.5 6327.5
12/16/2021 2021 12 16 199 14 41 27.5 -4.5 6323
12/17/2021 2021 12 17 200 12 43 27.5 -4.5 6318.5
12/18/2021 2021 12 18 201 9 37 23 -9 6309.5
12/19/2021 2021 12 19 202 9 37 23 -9 6300.5
12/20/2021 2021 12 20 203 9 39 24 -8 6292.5
12/21/2021 2021 12 21 204 9 39 24 -8 6284.5
12/22/2021 2021 12 22 205 10 36 23 -9 6275.5
12/23/2021 2021 12 23 206 21 50 35.5 3.5 6279
12/24/2021 2021 12 24 207 41 50 45.5 13.5 6292.5
12/25/2021 2021 12 25 208 32 52 42 10 6302.5
12/26/2021 2021 12 26 209 30 45 37.5 5.5 6308
12/27/2021 2021 12 27 210 21 45 33 1 6309
12/28/2021 2021 12 28 211 28 39 33.5 1.5 6310.5
12/29/2021 2021 12 29 212 18 43 30.5 -1.5 6309
12/30/2021 2021 12 30 213 32 46 39 7 6316
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
12/31/2021 2021 12 31 214 32 45 38.5 6.5 6322.5
1/1/2022 2022 1 1 215 14 32 23 -9 6313.5
1/2/2022 2022 1 2 216 9 30 19.5 -12.5 6301
1/3/2022 2022 1 3 217 5 30 17.5 -14.5 6286.5
1/4/2022 2022 1 4 218 12 36 24 -8 6278.5
1/5/2022 2022 1 5 219 12 48 30 -2 6276.5
1/6/2022 2022 1 6 220 21 55 38 6 6282.5
1/7/2022 2022 1 7 221 18 52 35 3 6285.5
1/8/2022 2022 1 8 222 25 52 38.5 6.5 6292
1/9/2022 2022 1 9 223 14 45 29.5 -2.5 6289.5
1/10/2022 2022 1 10 224 10 43 26.5 -5.5 6284
1/11/2022 2022 1 11 225 14 43 28.5 -3.5 6280.5
1/12/2022 2022 1 12 226 16 46 31 -1 6279.5
1/13/2022 2022 1 13 227 12 45 28.5 -3.5 6276
1/14/2022 2022 1 14 228 18 54 36 4 6280
1/15/2022 2022 1 15 229 14 46 30 -2 6278
1/16/2022 2022 1 16 230 10 45 27.5 -4.5 6273.5
1/17/2022 2022 1 17 231 10 41 25.5 -6.5 6267
1/18/2022 2022 1 18 232 18 43 30.5 -1.5 6265.5
1/19/2022 2022 1 19 233 19 50 34.5 2.5 6268
1/20/2022 2022 1 20 234 12 45 28.5 -3.5 6264.5
1/21/2022 2022 1 21 235 21 39 30 -2 6262.5
1/22/2022 2022 1 22 236 19 48 33.5 1.5 6264
1/23/2022 2022 1 23 237 12 46 29 -3 6261
1/24/2022 2022 1 24 238 10 50 30 -2 6259
1/25/2022 2022 1 25 239 19 46 32.5 0.5 6259.5
1/26/2022 2022 1 26 240 9 43 26 -6 6253.5
1/27/2022 2022 1 27 241 9 45 27 -5 6248.5
1/28/2022 2022 1 28 242 9 41 25 -7 6241.5
1/29/2022 2022 1 29 243 5 43 24 -8 6233.5
1/30/2022 2022 1 30 244 5 45 25 -7 6226.5
1/31/2022 2022 1 31 245 7 45 26 -6 6220.5
2/1/2022 2022 2 1 246 14 43 28.5 -3.5 6217
2/2/2022 2022 2 2 247 9 36 22.5 -9.5 6207.5
2/3/2022 2022 2 3 248 5 36 20.5 -11.5 6196
2/4/2022 2022 2 4 249 5 41 23 -9 6187
2/5/2022 2022 2 5 250 5 41 23 -9 6178
2/6/2022 2022 2 6 251 10 48 29 -3 6175
2/7/2022 2022 2 7 252 12 50 31 -1 6174
2/8/2022 2022 2 8 253 12 54 33 1 6175
2/9/2022 2022 2 9 254 16 59 37.5 5.5 6180.5
2/10/2022 2022 2 10 255 18 57 37.5 5.5 6186
2/11/2022 2022 2 11 256 21 66 43.5 11.5 6197.5
2/12/2022 2022 2 12 257 23 50 36.5 4.5 6202
2/13/2022 2022 2 13 258 14 54 34 2 6204
2/14/2022 2022 2 14 259 14 54 34 2 6206
2/15/2022 2022 2 15 260 23 61 42 10 6216
2/16/2022 2022 2 16 261 27 48 37.5 5.5 6221.5
2/17/2022 2022 2 17 262 23 46 34.5 2.5 6224
2/18/2022 2022 2 18 263 19 52 35.5 3.5 6227.5
2/19/2022 2022 2 19 264 14 55 34.5 2.5 6230
2/20/2022 2022 2 20 265 14 63 38.5 6.5 6236.5
2/21/2022 2022 2 21 266 32 55 43.5 11.5 6248
2/22/2022 2022 2 22 267 27 39 33 1 6249
2/23/2022 2022 2 23 268 28 43 35.5 3.5 6252.5
2/24/2022 2022 2 24 269 12 37 24.5 -7.5 6245
2/25/2022 2022 2 25 270 12 41 26.5 -5.5 6239.5
2/26/2022 2022 2 26 271 7 41 24 -8 6231.5
2/27/2022 2022 2 27 272 9 45 27 -5 6226.5
2/28/2022 2022 2 28 273 16 55 35.5 3.5 6230
3/1/2022 2022 3 1 274 18 63 40.5 8.5 6238.5
3/2/2022 2022 3 2 275 23 66 44.5 12.5 6251
3/3/2022 2022 3 3 276 25 64 44.5 12.5 6263.5
3/4/2022 2022 3 4 277 34 61 47.5 15.5 6279
3/5/2022 2022 3 5 278 32 54 43 11 6290
3/6/2022 2022 3 6 279 19 50 34.5 2.5 6292.5
3/7/2022 2022 3 7 280 19 43 31 -1 6291.5
3/8/2022 2022 3 8 281 12 46 29 -3 6288.5
3/9/2022 2022 3 9 282 19 54 36.5 4.5 6293
3/10/2022 2022 3 10 283 25 43 34 2 6295
3/11/2022 2022 3 11 284 9 46 27.5 -4.5 6290.5
3/12/2022 2022 3 12 285 18 54 36 4 6294.5
3/13/2022 2022 3 13 286 21 59 40 8 6302.5
3/14/2022 2022 3 14 287 28 55 41.5 9.5 6312
3/15/2022 2022 3 15 288 21 64 42.5 10.5 6322.5
3/16/2022 2022 3 16 289 37 55 46 14 6336.5
3/17/2022 2022 3 17 290 30 55 42.5 10.5 6347
3/18/2022 2022 3 18 291 21 61 41 9 6356
3/19/2022 2022 3 19 292 25 64 44.5 12.5 6368.5
3/20/2022 2022 3 20 293 39 66 52.5 20.5 6389
3/21/2022 2022 3 21 294 36 59 47.5 15.5 6404.5
3/22/2022 2022 3 22 295 27 59 43 11 6415.5
3/23/2022 2022 3 23 296 23 63 43 11 6426.5
3/24/2022 2022 3 24 297 27 72 49.5 17.5 6444
3/25/2022 2022 3 25 298 32 79 55.5 23.5 6467.5
3/26/2022 2022 3 26 299 36 82 59 27 6494.5
3/27/2022 2022 3 27 300 37 81 59 27 6521.5
3/28/2022 2022 3 28 301 50 72 61 29 6550.5
3/29/2022 2022 3 29 302 36 59 47.5 15.5 6566
3/30/2022 2022 3 30 303 34 66 50 18 6584
3/31/2022 2022 3 31 304 36 63 49.5 17.5 6601.5
4/1/2022 2022 4 1 305 34 66 50 18 6619.5
4/2/2022 2022 4 2 306 32 73 52.5 20.5 6640
4/3/2022 2022 4 3 307 48 68 58 26 6666
4/4/2022 2022 4 4 308 36 77 56.5 24.5 6690.5
4/5/2022 2022 4 5 309 41 70 55.5 23.5 6714
4/6/2022 2022 4 6 310 28 59 43.5 11.5 6725.5
4/7/2022 2022 4 7 311 28 66 47 15 6740.5
4/8/2022 2022 4 8 312 32 73 52.5 20.5 6761
4/9/2022 2022 4 9 313 37 79 58 26 6787
4/10/2022 2022 4 10 314 39 55 47 15 6802
4/11/2022 2022 4 11 315 27 73 50 18 6820
4/12/2022 2022 4 12 316 34 46 40 8 6828
4/13/2022 2022 4 13 317 23 54 38.5 6.5 6834.5
4/14/2022 2022 4 14 318 23 64 43.5 11.5 6846
4/15/2022 2022 4 15 319 45 73 59 27 6873
4/16/2022 2022 4 16 320 41 77 59 27 6900
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
4/17/2022 2022 4 17 321 37 77 57 25 6925
4/18/2022 2022 4 18 322 36 81 58.5 26.5 6951.5
4/19/2022 2022 4 19 323 45 84 64.5 32.5 6984
4/20/2022 2022 4 20 324 39 77 58 26 7010
4/21/2022 2022 4 21 325 54 81 67.5 35.5 7045.5
4/22/2022 2022 4 22 326 43 66 54.5 22.5 7068
4/23/2022 2022 4 23 327 39 59 49 17 7085
4/24/2022 2022 4 24 328 28 61 44.5 12.5 7097.5
4/25/2022 2022 4 25 329 30 64 47 15 7112.5
4/26/2022 2022 4 26 330 32 79 55.5 23.5 7136
4/27/2022 2022 4 27 331 43 82 62.5 30.5 7166.5
4/28/2022 2022 4 28 332 41 79 60 28 7194.5
4/29/2022 2022 4 29 333 45 66 55.5 23.5 7218
4/30/2022 2022 4 30 334 32 70 51 19 7237
5/1/2022 2022 5 1 335 37 77 57 25 7262
5/2/2022 2022 5 2 336 46 77 61.5 29.5 7291.5
5/3/2022 2022 5 3 337 45 68 56.5 24.5 7316
5/4/2022 2022 5 4 338 32 66 49 17 7333
5/5/2022 2022 5 5 339 37 77 57 25 7358
5/6/2022 2022 5 6 340 45 91 68 36 7394
5/7/2022 2022 5 7 341 66 86 76 44 7438
5/8/2022 2022 5 8 342 48 81 64.5 32.5 7470.5
5/9/2022 2022 5 9 343 46 73 59.5 27.5 7498
5/10/2022 2022 5 10 344 54 77 65.5 33.5 7531.5
5/11/2022 2022 5 11 345 50 79 64.5 32.5 7564
5/12/2022 2022 5 12 346 45 68 56.5 24.5 7588.5
5/13/2022 2022 5 13 347 36 77 56.5 24.5 7613
5/14/2022 2022 5 14 348 41 88 64.5 32.5 7645.5
5/15/2022 2022 5 15 349 46 91 68.5 36.5 7682
5/16/2022 2022 5 16 350 55 93 74 42 7724
5/17/2022 2022 5 17 351 50 91 70.5 38.5 7762.5
5/18/2022 2022 5 18 352 52 90 71 39 7801.5
5/19/2022 2022 5 19 353 52 90 71 39 7840.5
5/20/2022 2022 5 20 354 48 68 58 26 7866.5
5/21/2022 2022 5 21 355 43 66 54.5 22.5 7889
5/22/2022 2022 5 22 356 34 79 56.5 24.5 7913.5
5/23/2022 2022 5 23 357 52 72 62 30 7943.5
5/24/2022 2022 5 24 358 41 77 59 27 7970.5
5/25/2022 2022 5 25 359 45 82 63.5 31.5 8002
5/26/2022 2022 5 26 360 45 93 69 37 8039
5/27/2022 2022 5 27 361 52 91 71.5 39.5 8078.5
5/28/2022 2022 5 28 362 66 90 78 46 8124.5
5/29/2022 2022 5 29 363 50 72 61 29 8153.5
5/30/2022 2022 5 30 364 41 66 53.5 21.5 8175
5/31/2022 2022 5 31 365 37 73 55 23 8198
6/1/2022 2022 6 1 1 43 79 61 29 29
6/2/2022 2022 6 2 2 41 88 64.5 32.5 61.5
6/3/2022 2022 6 3 3 55 91 73 41 102.5
6/4/2022 2022 6 4 4 52 90 71 39 141.5
6/5/2022 2022 6 5 5 63 91 77 45 186.5
6/6/2022 2022 6 6 6 61 91 76 44 230.5
6/7/2022 2022 6 7 7 57 97 77 45 275.5
6/8/2022 2022 6 8 8 55 97 76 44 319.5
6/9/2022 2022 6 9 9 61 100 80.5 48.5 368
6/10/2022 2022 6 10 10 61 104 82.5 50.5 418.5
6/11/2022 2022 6 11 11 63 104 83.5 51.5 470
6/12/2022 2022 6 12 12 64 100 82 50 520
6/13/2022 2022 6 13 13 63 91 77 45 565
6/14/2022 2022 6 14 14 55 81 68 36 601
6/15/2022 2022 6 15 15 45 88 66.5 34.5 635.5
6/16/2022 2022 6 16 16 50 100 75 43 678.5
6/17/2022 2022 6 17 17 64 95 79.5 47.5 726
6/18/2022 2022 6 18 18 63 95 79 47 773
6/19/2022 2022 6 19 19 63 88 75.5 43.5 816.5
6/20/2022 2022 6 20 20 46 82 64 32 848.5
6/21/2022 2022 6 21 21 52 91 71.5 39.5 888
6/22/2022 2022 6 22 22 55 90 72.5 40.5 928.5
6/23/2022 2022 6 23 23 63 86 74.5 42.5 971
6/24/2022 2022 6 24 24 59 91 75 43 1014
6/25/2022 2022 6 25 25 63 95 79 47 1061
6/26/2022 2022 6 26 26 64 90 77 45 1106
6/27/2022 2022 6 27 27 61 95 78 46 1152
6/28/2022 2022 6 28 28 59 97 78 46 1198
6/29/2022 2022 6 29 29 68 97 82.5 50.5 1248.5
6/30/2022 2022 6 30 30 73 91 82 50 1298.5
7/1/2022 2022 7 1 31 66 91 78.5 46.5 1345
7/2/2022 2022 7 2 32 70 97 83.5 51.5 1396.5
7/3/2022 2022 7 3 33 68 97 82.5 50.5 1447
7/4/2022 2022 7 4 34 72 97 84.5 52.5 1499.5
7/5/2022 2022 7 5 35 68 95 81.5 49.5 1549
7/6/2022 2022 7 6 36 66 93 79.5 47.5 1596.5
7/7/2022 2022 7 7 37 63 97 80 48 1644.5
7/8/2022 2022 7 8 38 57 100 78.5 46.5 1691
7/9/2022 2022 7 9 39 63 104 83.5 51.5 1742.5
7/10/2022 2022 7 10 40 72 100 86 54 1796.5
7/11/2022 2022 7 11 41 73 102 87.5 55.5 1852
7/12/2022 2022 7 12 42 63 100 81.5 49.5 1901.5
7/13/2022 2022 7 13 43 77 97 87 55 1956.5
7/14/2022 2022 7 14 44 70 97 83.5 51.5 2008
7/15/2022 2022 7 15 45 68 90 79 47 2055
7/16/2022 2022 7 16 46 64 99 81.5 49.5 2104.5
7/17/2022 2022 7 17 47 68 104 86 54 2158.5
7/18/2022 2022 7 18 48 77 100 88.5 56.5 2215
7/19/2022 2022 7 19 49 66 100 83 51 2266
7/20/2022 2022 7 20 50 68 102 85 53 2319
7/21/2022 2022 7 21 51 68 104 86 54 2373
7/22/2022 2022 7 22 52 64 100 82 50 2423
7/23/2022 2022 7 23 53 73 100 86.5 54.5 2477.5
7/24/2022 2022 7 24 54 72 90 81 49 2526.5
7/25/2022 2022 7 25 55 63 95 79 47 2573.5
7/26/2022 2022 7 26 56 70 95 82.5 50.5 2624
7/27/2022 2022 7 27 57 68 93 80.5 48.5 2672.5
7/28/2022 2022 7 28 58 66 81 73.5 41.5 2714
7/29/2022 2022 7 29 59 61 91 76 44 2758
7/30/2022 2022 7 30 60 68 91 79.5 47.5 2805.5
7/31/2022 2022 7 31 61 64 90 77 45 2850.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
8/1/2022 2022 8 1 62 70 95 82.5 50.5 2901
8/2/2022 2022 8 2 63 68 97 82.5 50.5 2951.5
8/3/2022 2022 8 3 64 70 97 83.5 51.5 3003
8/4/2022 2022 8 4 65 68 100 84 52 3055
8/5/2022 2022 8 5 66 79 95 87 55 3110
8/6/2022 2022 8 6 67 70 99 84.5 52.5 3162.5
8/7/2022 2022 8 7 68 64 97 80.5 48.5 3211
8/8/2022 2022 8 8 69 64 99 81.5 49.5 3260.5
8/9/2022 2022 8 9 70 64 100 82 50 3310.5
8/10/2022 2022 8 10 71 73 99 86 54 3364.5
8/11/2022 2022 8 11 72 72 99 85.5 53.5 3418
8/12/2022 2022 8 12 73 72 95 83.5 51.5 3469.5
8/13/2022 2022 8 13 74 70 95 82.5 50.5 3520
8/14/2022 2022 8 14 75 68 91 79.5 47.5 3567.5
8/15/2022 2022 8 15 76 66 90 78 46 3613.5
8/16/2022 2022 8 16 77 66 86 76 44 3657.5
8/17/2022 2022 8 17 78 68 91 79.5 47.5 3705
8/18/2022 2022 8 18 79 63 91 77 45 3750
8/19/2022 2022 8 19 80 63 79 71 39 3789
8/20/2022 2022 8 20 81 59 82 70.5 38.5 3827.5
8/21/2022 2022 8 21 82 59 82 70.5 38.5 3866
8/22/2022 2022 8 22 83 63 91 77 45 3911
8/23/2022 2022 8 23 84 63 95 79 47 3958
8/24/2022 2022 8 24 85 61 97 79 47 4005
8/25/2022 2022 8 25 86 70 84 77 45 4050
8/26/2022 2022 8 26 87 63 88 75.5 43.5 4093.5
8/27/2022 2022 8 27 88 59 90 74.5 42.5 4136
8/28/2022 2022 8 28 89 59 91 75 43 4179
8/29/2022 2022 8 29 90 59 95 77 45 4224
8/30/2022 2022 8 30 91 55 97 76 44 4268
8/31/2022 2022 8 31 92 59 99 79 47 4315
9/1/2022 2022 9 1 93 61 99 80 48 4363
9/2/2022 2022 9 2 94 63 100 81.5 49.5 4412.5
9/3/2022 2022 9 3 95 57 100 78.5 46.5 4459
9/4/2022 2022 9 4 96 68 97 82.5 50.5 4509.5
9/5/2022 2022 9 5 97 59 102 80.5 48.5 4558
9/6/2022 2022 9 6 98 59 104 81.5 49.5 4607.5
9/7/2022 2022 9 7 99 61 100 80.5 48.5 4656
9/8/2022 2022 9 8 100 61 100 80.5 48.5 4704.5
9/9/2022 2022 9 9 101 61 97 79 47 4751.5
9/10/2022 2022 9 10 102 59 90 74.5 42.5 4794
9/11/2022 2022 9 11 103 61 90 75.5 43.5 4837.5
9/12/2022 2022 9 12 104 54 91 72.5 40.5 4878
9/13/2022 2022 9 13 105 64 79 71.5 39.5 4917.5
9/14/2022 2022 9 14 106 57 79 68 36 4953.5
9/15/2022 2022 9 15 107 52 79 65.5 33.5 4987
9/16/2022 2022 9 16 108 52 81 66.5 34.5 5021.5
9/17/2022 2022 9 17 109 55 82 68.5 36.5 5058
9/18/2022 2022 9 18 110 54 88 71 39 5097
9/19/2022 2022 9 19 111 45 90 67.5 35.5 5132.5
9/20/2022 2022 9 20 112 55 79 67 35 5167.5
9/21/2022 2022 9 21 113 54 68 61 29 5196.5
9/22/2022 2022 9 22 114 55 81 68 36 5232.5
9/23/2022 2022 9 23 115 50 79 64.5 32.5 5265
9/24/2022 2022 9 24 116 46 81 63.5 31.5 5296.5
9/25/2022 2022 9 25 117 46 84 65 33 5329.5
9/26/2022 2022 9 26 118 45 86 65.5 33.5 5363
9/27/2022 2022 9 27 119 48 86 67 35 5398
9/28/2022 2022 9 28 120 52 88 70 38 5436
9/29/2022 2022 9 29 121 54 86 70 38 5474
9/30/2022 2022 9 30 122 52 75 63.5 31.5 5505.5
10/1/2022 2022 10 1 123 50 73 61.5 29.5 5535
10/2/2022 2022 10 2 124 52 72 62 30 5565
10/3/2022 2022 10 3 125 48 72 60 28 5593
10/4/2022 2022 10 4 126 46 75 60.5 28.5 5621.5
10/5/2022 2022 10 5 127 50 77 63.5 31.5 5653
10/6/2022 2022 10 6 128 43 77 60 28 5681
10/7/2022 2022 10 7 129 43 79 61 29 5710
10/8/2022 2022 10 8 130 43 79 61 29 5739
10/9/2022 2022 10 9 131 43 77 60 28 5767
10/10/2022 2022 10 10 132 43 79 61 29 5796
10/11/2022 2022 10 11 133 41 81 61 29 5825
10/12/2022 2022 10 12 134 41 79 60 28 5853
10/13/2022 2022 10 13 135 37 79 58 26 5879
10/14/2022 2022 10 14 136 37 77 57 25 5904
10/15/2022 2022 10 15 137 36 77 56.5 24.5 5928.5
10/16/2022 2022 10 16 138 41 72 56.5 24.5 5953
10/17/2022 2022 10 17 139 36 72 54 22 5975
10/18/2022 2022 10 18 140 34 75 54.5 22.5 5997.5
10/19/2022 2022 10 19 141 34 75 54.5 22.5 6020
10/20/2022 2022 10 20 142 32 75 53.5 21.5 6041.5
10/21/2022 2022 10 21 143 34 77 55.5 23.5 6065
10/22/2022 2022 10 22 144 43 72 57.5 25.5 6090.5
10/23/2022 2022 10 23 145 37 52 44.5 12.5 6103
10/24/2022 2022 10 24 146 34 54 44 12 6115
10/25/2022 2022 10 25 147 30 54 42 10 6125
10/26/2022 2022 10 26 148 41 57 49 17 6142
10/27/2022 2022 10 27 149 34 52 43 11 6153
10/28/2022 2022 10 28 150 28 54 41 9 6162
10/29/2022 2022 10 29 151 30 54 42 10 6172
10/30/2022 2022 10 30 152 30 61 45.5 13.5 6185.5
10/31/2022 2022 10 31 153 28 61 44.5 12.5 6198
11/1/2022 2022 11 1 154 30 59 44.5 12.5 6210.5
11/2/2022 2022 11 2 155 50 63 56.5 24.5 6235
11/3/2022 2022 11 3 156 36 52 44 12 6247
11/4/2022 2022 11 4 157 28 50 39 7 6254
11/5/2022 2022 11 5 158 32 54 43 11 6265
11/6/2022 2022 11 6 159 34 59 46.5 14.5 6279.5
11/7/2022 2022 11 7 160 46 70 58 26 6305.5
11/8/2022 2022 11 8 161 50 64 57 25 6330.5
11/9/2022 2022 11 9 162 32 59 45.5 13.5 6344
11/10/2022 2022 11 10 163 25 46 35.5 3.5 6347.5
11/11/2022 2022 11 11 164 18 41 29.5 -2.5 6345
11/12/2022 2022 11 12 165 19 43 31 -1 6344
11/13/2022 2022 11 13 166 19 45 32 0 6344
11/14/2022 2022 11 14 167 23 45 34 2 6346
11/15/2022 2022 11 15 168 18 43 30.5 -1.5 6344.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
11/16/2022 2022 11 16 169 14 43 28.5 -3.5 6341
11/17/2022 2022 11 17 170 14 46 30 -2 6339
11/18/2022 2022 11 18 171 19 45 32 0 6339
11/19/2022 2022 11 19 172 14 43 28.5 -3.5 6335.5
11/20/2022 2022 11 20 173 10 43 26.5 -5.5 6330
11/21/2022 2022 11 21 174 12 45 28.5 -3.5 6326.5
11/22/2022 2022 11 22 175 14 45 29.5 -2.5 6324
11/23/2022 2022 11 23 176 14 48 31 -1 6323
11/24/2022 2022 11 24 177 18 52 35 3 6326
11/25/2022 2022 11 25 178 14 50 32 0 6326
11/26/2022 2022 11 26 179 16 45 30.5 -1.5 6324.5
11/27/2022 2022 11 27 180 19 50 34.5 2.5 6327
11/28/2022 2022 11 28 181 18 55 36.5 4.5 6331.5
11/29/2022 2022 11 29 182 18 37 27.5 -4.5 6327
11/30/2022 2022 11 30 183 12 39 25.5 -6.5 6320.5
12/1/2022 2022 12 1 184 12 54 33 1 6321.5
12/2/2022 2022 12 2 185 28 52 40 8 6329.5
12/3/2022 2022 12 3 186 28 45 36.5 4.5 6334
12/4/2022 2022 12 4 187 23 48 35.5 3.5 6337.5
12/5/2022 2022 12 5 188 27 54 40.5 8.5 6346
12/6/2022 2022 12 6 189 34 46 40 8 6354
12/7/2022 2022 12 7 190 32 36 34 2 6356
12/8/2022 2022 12 8 191 23 43 33 1 6357
12/9/2022 2022 12 9 192 27 43 35 3 6360
12/10/2022 2022 12 10 193 19 41 30 -2 6358
12/11/2022 2022 12 11 194 23 52 37.5 5.5 6363.5
12/12/2022 2022 12 12 195 27 45 36 4 6367.5
12/13/2022 2022 12 13 196 18 41 29.5 -2.5 6365
12/14/2022 2022 12 14 197 16 43 29.5 -2.5 6362.5
12/15/2022 2022 12 15 198 19 43 31 -1 6361.5
12/16/2022 2022 12 16 199 10 34 22 -10 6351.5
12/17/2022 2022 12 17 200 7 32 19.5 -12.5 6339
12/18/2022 2022 12 18 201 5 32 18.5 -13.5 6325.5
12/19/2022 2022 12 19 202 5 34 19.5 -12.5 6313
12/20/2022 2022 12 20 203 12 34 23 -9 6304
12/21/2022 2022 12 21 204 10 37 23.5 -8.5 6295.5
12/22/2022 2022 12 22 205 18 46 32 0 6295.5
12/23/2022 2022 12 23 206 23 43 33 1 6296.5
12/24/2022 2022 12 24 207 18 46 32 0 6296.5
12/25/2022 2022 12 25 208 21 46 33.5 1.5 6298
12/26/2022 2022 12 26 209 23 45 34 2 6300
12/27/2022 2022 12 27 210 21 41 31 -1 6299
12/28/2022 2022 12 28 211 27 45 36 4 6303
12/29/2022 2022 12 29 212 19 41 30 -2 6301
12/30/2022 2022 12 30 213 32 41 36.5 4.5 6305.5
12/31/2022 2022 12 31 214 30 54 42 10 6315.5
1/1/2023 2023 1 1 215 41 52 46.5 14.5 6330
1/2/2023 2023 1 2 216 34 43 38.5 6.5 6336.5
1/3/2023 2023 1 3 217 28 41 34.5 2.5 6339
1/4/2023 2023 1 4 218 23 41 32 0 6339
1/5/2023 2023 1 5 219 30 41 35.5 3.5 6342.5
1/6/2023 2023 1 6 220 32 48 40 8 6350.5
1/7/2023 2023 1 7 221 23 43 33 1 6351.5
1/8/2023 2023 1 8 222 30 43 36.5 4.5 6356
1/9/2023 2023 1 9 223 23 43 33 1 6357
1/10/2023 2023 1 10 224 36 55 45.5 13.5 6370.5
1/11/2023 2023 1 11 225 28 50 39 7 6377.5
1/12/2023 2023 1 12 226 25 45 35 3 6380.5
1/13/2023 2023 1 13 227 23 43 33 1 6381.5
1/14/2023 2023 1 14 228 27 39 33 1 6382.5
1/15/2023 2023 1 15 229 36 50 43 11 6393.5
1/16/2023 2023 1 16 230 32 43 37.5 5.5 6399
1/17/2023 2023 1 17 231 32 37 34.5 2.5 6401.5
1/18/2023 2023 1 18 232 25 43 34 2 6403.5
1/19/2023 2023 1 19 233 19 34 26.5 -5.5 6398
1/20/2023 2023 1 20 234 28 36 32 0 6398
1/21/2023 2023 1 21 235 19 36 27.5 -4.5 6393.5
1/22/2023 2023 1 22 236 18 32 25 -7 6386.5
1/23/2023 2023 1 23 237 19 37 28 -4 6382.5
1/24/2023 2023 1 24 238 19 41 30 -2 6380.5
1/25/2023 2023 1 25 239 27 41 34 2 6382.5
1/26/2023 2023 1 26 240 16 37 26.5 -5.5 6377
1/27/2023 2023 1 27 241 19 39 29 -3 6374
1/28/2023 2023 1 28 242 23 43 33 1 6375
1/29/2023 2023 1 29 243 19 46 32.5 0.5 6375.5
1/30/2023 2023 1 30 244 23 45 34 2 6377.5
1/31/2023 2023 1 31 245 18 32 25 -7 6370.5
2/1/2023 2023 2 1 246 10 37 23.5 -8.5 6362
2/2/2023 2023 2 2 247 12 43 27.5 -4.5 6357.5
2/3/2023 2023 2 3 248 14 43 28.5 -3.5 6354
2/4/2023 2023 2 4 249 18 45 31.5 -0.5 6353.5
2/5/2023 2023 2 5 250 19 54 36.5 4.5 6358
2/6/2023 2023 2 6 251 21 46 33.5 1.5 6359.5
2/7/2023 2023 2 7 252 19 45 32 0 6359.5
2/8/2023 2023 2 8 253 21 50 35.5 3.5 6363
2/9/2023 2023 2 9 254 19 41 30 -2 6361
2/10/2023 2023 2 10 255 12 43 27.5 -4.5 6356.5
2/11/2023 2023 2 11 256 18 43 30.5 -1.5 6355
2/12/2023 2023 2 12 257 14 50 32 0 6355
2/13/2023 2023 2 13 258 19 45 32 0 6355
2/14/2023 2023 2 14 259 21 32 26.5 -5.5 6349.5
2/15/2023 2023 2 15 260 12 32 22 -10 6339.5
2/16/2023 2023 2 16 261 -8 28 10 -22 6317.5
2/17/2023 2023 2 17 262 -6 30 12 -20 6297.5
2/18/2023 2023 2 18 263 3 32 17.5 -14.5 6283
2/19/2023 2023 2 19 264 7 37 22 -10 6273
2/20/2023 2023 2 20 265 18 43 30.5 -1.5 6271.5
2/21/2023 2023 2 21 266 27 54 40.5 8.5 6280
2/22/2023 2023 2 22 267 28 48 38 6 6286
2/23/2023 2023 2 23 268 28 39 33.5 1.5 6287.5
2/24/2023 2023 2 24 269 30 41 35.5 3.5 6291
2/25/2023 2023 2 25 270 23 50 36.5 4.5 6295.5
2/26/2023 2023 2 26 271 30 46 38 6 6301.5
2/27/2023 2023 2 27 272 34 46 40 8 6309.5
2/28/2023 2023 2 28 273 32 43 37.5 5.5 6315
3/1/2023 2023 3 1 274 32 43 37.5 5.5 6320.5
3/2/2023 2023 3 2 275 32 46 39 7 6327.5
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
3/3/2023 2023 3 3 276 25 48 36.5 4.5 6332
3/4/2023 2023 3 4 277 27 48 37.5 5.5 6337.5
3/5/2023 2023 3 5 278 41 54 47.5 15.5 6353
3/6/2023 2023 3 6 279 36 55 45.5 13.5 6366.5
3/7/2023 2023 3 7 280 27 54 40.5 8.5 6375
3/8/2023 2023 3 8 281 27 54 40.5 8.5 6383.5
3/9/2023 2023 3 9 282 21 55 38 6 6389.5
3/10/2023 2023 3 10 283 37 55 46 14 6403.5
3/11/2023 2023 3 11 284 34 55 44.5 12.5 6416
3/12/2023 2023 3 12 285 30 57 43.5 11.5 6427.5
3/13/2023 2023 3 13 286 30 54 42 10 6437.5
3/14/2023 2023 3 14 287 32 61 46.5 14.5 6452
3/15/2023 2023 3 15 288 41 52 46.5 14.5 6466.5
3/16/2023 2023 3 16 289 34 48 41 9 6475.5
3/17/2023 2023 3 17 290 30 45 37.5 5.5 6481
3/18/2023 2023 3 18 291 19 50 34.5 2.5 6483.5
3/19/2023 2023 3 19 292 23 54 38.5 6.5 6490
3/20/2023 2023 3 20 293 34 50 42 10 6500
3/21/2023 2023 3 21 294 34 45 39.5 7.5 6507.5
3/22/2023 2023 3 22 295 37 50 43.5 11.5 6519
3/23/2023 2023 3 23 296 32 54 43 11 6530
3/24/2023 2023 3 24 297 30 50 40 8 6538
3/25/2023 2023 3 25 298 23 43 33 1 6539
3/26/2023 2023 3 26 299 23 43 33 1 6540
3/27/2023 2023 3 27 300 27 45 36 4 6544
3/28/2023 2023 3 28 301 21 54 37.5 5.5 6549.5
3/29/2023 2023 3 29 302 30 64 47 15 6564.5
3/30/2023 2023 3 30 303 34 52 43 11 6575.5
3/31/2023 2023 3 31 304 27 55 41 9 6584.5
4/1/2023 2023 4 1 305 28 64 46 14 6598.5
4/2/2023 2023 4 2 306 39 70 54.5 22.5 6621
4/3/2023 2023 4 3 307 36 66 51 19 6640
4/4/2023 2023 4 4 308 32 45 38.5 6.5 6646.5
4/5/2023 2023 4 5 309 21 45 33 1 6647.5
4/6/2023 2023 4 6 310 18 52 35 3 6650.5
4/7/2023 2023 4 7 311 21 63 42 10 6660.5
4/8/2023 2023 4 8 312 41 70 55.5 23.5 6684
4/9/2023 2023 4 9 313 36 72 54 22 6706
4/10/2023 2023 4 10 314 34 77 55.5 23.5 6729.5
4/11/2023 2023 4 11 315 36 84 60 28 6757.5
4/12/2023 2023 4 12 316 43 79 61 29 6786.5
4/13/2023 2023 4 13 317 50 68 59 27 6813.5
4/14/2023 2023 4 14 318 39 61 50 18 6831.5
4/15/2023 2023 4 15 319 30 61 45.5 13.5 6845
4/16/2023 2023 4 16 320 32 70 51 19 6864
4/17/2023 2023 4 17 321 34 77 55.5 23.5 6887.5
4/18/2023 2023 4 18 322 45 73 59 27 6914.5
4/19/2023 2023 4 19 323 32 54 43 11 6925.5
4/20/2023 2023 4 20 324 23 57 40 8 6933.5
4/21/2023 2023 4 21 325 28 66 47 15 6948.5
4/22/2023 2023 4 22 326 37 63 50 18 6966.5
4/23/2023 2023 4 23 327 32 66 49 17 6983.5
4/24/2023 2023 4 24 328 36 72 54 22 7005.5
4/25/2023 2023 4 25 329 41 61 51 19 7024.5
4/26/2023 2023 4 26 330 32 72 52 20 7044.5
4/27/2023 2023 4 27 331 34 77 55.5 23.5 7068
4/28/2023 2023 4 28 332 41 70 55.5 23.5 7091.5
4/29/2023 2023 4 29 333 32 81 56.5 24.5 7116
4/30/2023 2023 4 30 334 37 86 61.5 29.5 7145.5
5/1/2023 2023 5 1 335 45 86 65.5 33.5 7179
5/2/2023 2023 5 2 336 45 77 61 29 7208
5/3/2023 2023 5 3 337 37 81 59 27 7235
5/4/2023 2023 5 4 338 57 73 65 33 7268
5/5/2023 2023 5 5 339 52 68 60 28 7296
5/6/2023 2023 5 6 340 34 70 52 20 7316
5/7/2023 2023 5 7 341 50 72 61 29 7345
5/8/2023 2023 5 8 342 37 79 58 26 7371
5/9/2023 2023 5 9 343 41 81 61 29 7400
5/10/2023 2023 5 10 344 46 77 61.5 29.5 7429.5
5/11/2023 2023 5 11 345 37 79 58 26 7455.5
5/12/2023 2023 5 12 346 41 77 59 27 7482.5
5/13/2023 2023 5 13 347 52 79 65.5 33.5 7516
5/14/2023 2023 5 14 348 50 77 63.5 31.5 7547.5
5/15/2023 2023 5 15 349 50 79 64.5 32.5 7580
5/16/2023 2023 5 16 350 46 84 65 33 7613
5/17/2023 2023 5 17 351 48 81 64.5 32.5 7645.5
5/18/2023 2023 5 18 352 54 82 68 36 7681.5
5/19/2023 2023 5 19 353 50 82 66 34 7715.5
5/20/2023 2023 5 20 354 54 81 67.5 35.5 7751
5/21/2023 2023 5 21 355 46 84 65 33 7784
5/22/2023 2023 5 22 356 57 82 69.5 37.5 7821.5
5/23/2023 2023 5 23 357 48 84 66 34 7855.5
5/24/2023 2023 5 24 358 54 86 70 38 7893.5
5/25/2023 2023 5 25 359 52 86 69 37 7930.5
5/26/2023 2023 5 26 360 52 84 68 36 7966.5
5/27/2023 2023 5 27 361 46 82 64 32 7998.5
5/28/2023 2023 5 28 362 45 88 66.5 34.5 8033
5/29/2023 2023 5 29 363 50 88 69 37 8070
5/30/2023 2023 5 30 364 46 88 67 35 8105
5/31/2023 2023 5 31 365 52 86 69 37 8142
6/1/2023 2023 6 1 1 50 81 65.5 33.5 33.5
6/2/2023 2023 6 2 2 54 77 65.5 33.5 67
6/3/2023 2023 6 3 3 45 82 63.5 31.5 98.5
6/4/2023 2023 6 4 4 45 86 65.5 33.5 132
6/5/2023 2023 6 5 5 50 90 70 38 170
6/6/2023 2023 6 6 6 63 91 77 45 215
6/7/2023 2023 6 7 7 52 82 67 35 250
6/8/2023 2023 6 8 8 48 86 67 35 285
6/9/2023 2023 6 9 9 46 86 66 34 319
6/10/2023 2023 6 10 10 50 86 68 36 355
6/11/2023 2023 6 11 11 54 88 71 39 394
6/12/2023 2023 6 12 12 50 79 64.5 32.5 426.5
6/13/2023 2023 6 13 13 45 81 63 31 457.5
6/14/2023 2023 6 14 14 52 81 66.5 34.5 492
6/15/2023 2023 6 15 15 54 79 66.5 34.5 526.5
6/16/2023 2023 6 16 16 50 73 61.5 29.5 556
Daily Data Summaries
Date Year MO Day Day in frost Year Minimum Temperature (Deg F)Maximum Temperature (Deg F)Average Temperature (Deg F)Degree Day Cum. Degree Day
Note: This data has been modified to remove all data points in which the there was no information.
6/17/2023 2023 6 17 17 48 84 66 34 590
6/18/2023 2023 6 18 18 54 91 72.5 40.5 630.5
6/19/2023 2023 6 19 19 72 93 82.5 50.5 681
6/20/2023 2023 6 20 20 70 90 80 48 729
6/21/2023 2023 6 21 21 63 90 76.5 44.5 773.5
6/22/2023 2023 6 22 22 54 93 73.5 41.5 815
6/23/2023 2023 6 23 23 55 86 70.5 38.5 853.5
ATTACHMENT D2
FROST INDEX CALCULATIONS

ATTACHMENT D2.1
CUMULATIVE DEGREE DAY PLOTS

0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
1974
1974
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
1975
1975
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
1976
1976
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
1977
1977
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
1978
1978
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
1979
1979
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
1980
1980
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day In Frost Year
1981
1981
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
1982
1982
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
1983
1983
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
1984
1984
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
1985
1985
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
1986
1986
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
1987
1987
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
1988
1988
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
1989
1989
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
1990
1990
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
1991
1991
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
1992
1992
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
1993
1993
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
1994
1994
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
1995
1995
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
1996
1996
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
1998
1998
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
1999
1999
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
2000
2000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
2001
2001
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
2002
2002
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
2003
2003
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
2004
2004
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
2005
2005
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
2006
2006
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
2007
2007
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
2008
2008
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
2009
2009
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
2010
2010
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
2011
2011
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
2012
2012
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
2013
2013
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
2014
2014
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
2016
2016
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
2018
2018
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
2019
2019
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
2021
2021
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
2022
2022
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 100 200 300 400
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e

D
e
g
r
e
e

D
a
y
Day in Frost Year
2023
2023
ATTACHMENT D2.2
FROST INDEX DETERMINATION
Year Days Deg-Day Days Deg-Day Deg-Day Days
1974 187 5910.5 270 5149 761.5 83
1975 187 5941.5 247 5543.5 398 60
1976 179 5588 249 5230 358 70
1977 178 6150.5 248 5690 460.5 70
1978 204 6787.5 255 6685 102.5 51
1979 191 6610.5 262 5503.5 1107 71
1980 176 6354.5 223 5886 468.5 47
1981 190 6607.5 201 6592.5 15 11
1982 206 6694 262 6347.5 346.5 56
1983 207 5577 236 5391.5 185.5 29
1984 189 6456.5 273 6045 411.5 84
1985 187 5930.5 256 5626 304.5 69
1986 193 6284.5 227 6145.5 139 34
1987 190 6283 240 5884 399 50
1988 187 6584 255 5949.5 634.5 68
1989 182 7002 260 6288 714 78
1990 186 6462.5 251 6255 207.5 65
1991 178 6325 253 5385 940 75
1992 189 6313.5 253 5478 835.5 64
1993 177 6112 228 5817 295 51
1994 184 5732.5 252 5542.5 190 68
1995 185 6563 211 6529.5 33.5 26
1996 205 6385 238 6280 105 33
1997 200 2792.5 239 2587.5 205 39
1998 187 6237.5 228 6143.5 94 41
1999 194 6356 216 6169 187 22
2000 186 6122 206 6043.5 78.5 20
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006 182 6244 209 6130 114 27
2007 181 6263.5 251 6039 224.5 70
2008 194 6762 252 6482 280 58
2009 191 6050.5 230 6446 395.5 39
2010 186 6282 256 5864.5 417.5 70
2011 213 6564 264 6348 216 51
2012 188 6427.5 234 6281.5 146 46
2013 206 6652.5 251 5972.5 680 45
2014 186 5873 251 5071.53 801.47 65
2015
2016 187 6246.5 255 5984.5 262 68
2017
2018 191 6364.5 224 6261 103.5 33
2019 186 6384.5 233 6229.5 155 47
2020
2021 185 6145 246 5783.5 361.5 61
2022 197 6325 253 6175 150 56
2023 231 6401.5 263 6283 118.5 32
Beginning of Freeze End of Freeze
Results of Graphical analysis of Freeze Cumulative Degree Day Plots
insufficient data
insufficient data
insufficient data
insufficient data
insufficient data
insufficient data
insufficient data
insufficient data
These were calculate in accordance with step 1 of the Smith and Rager procedure
Avg. Temp (F)F
Year Avg. Temp (n) % values w/ 95% data
Degree-Day (F-
day)
Duration
(Days)
1974 52.1 364 99.73%52.1 761.5 83.00
1975 52.4 360 98.63%52.4 398.0 60.00
1976 51.8 365 100.00%51.8 358.0 70.00
1977 53.5 364 99.73%53.5 460.5 70.00
1978 56.7 365 100.00%56.7 102.5 51.00
1979 52.6 365 100.00%52.6 1107.0 71.00
1980 54.7 365 100.00%54.7 468.5 47.00
1981 56.8 365 100.00%56.8 15.0 11.00
1982 55.5 364 99.73%55.5 346.5 56.00
1983 53.8 353 96.71%53.8 185.5 29.00
1984 54.0 365 100.00%54.0 411.5 84.00
1985 54.3 365 100.00%54.3 304.5 69.00
1986 56.2 365 100.00%56.2 139.0 34.00
1987 54.6 363 99.45%54.6 399.0 50.00
1988 54.3 365 100.00%54.3 634.5 68.00
1989 57.1 365 100.00%57.1 714.0 78.00
1990 56.4 365 100.00%56.4 207.5 65.00
1991 53.1 353 96.71%53.1 940.0 75.00
1992 54.0 366 100.27%54.0 835.5 64.00
1993 54.1 365 100.00%54.1 295.0 51.00
1994 53.8 365 100.00%53.8 190.0 68.00
1995 56.8 365 100.00%56.8 33.5 26.00
1996 56.2 365 100.00%56.2 105.0 33.00
1998 55.0 288 78.90%55.0 205.0 39.00
1999 55.2 365 100.00%55.2 94.0 41.00
2000 57.4 365 100.00%57.4 187.0 22.00
2006 55.3 365 100.00%55.3 114.0 27
2007 55.6 365 100.00%55.6 224.5 70
2008 55.7 364 99.73%55.7 280.0 58
2009 56.2 366 100.27%56.2 395.5 39
2010 54.0 365 100.00%54.0 417.5 70
2011 55.1 365 100.00%55.1 216.0 51
2012 56.1 364 99.73%56.1 146.0 46
2013 53.4 366 100.27%53.4 680.0 45
2014 51.3 365 100.00%51.3 801.5 65
2016 54.2 365 100.00%54.2 262.0 68
2018 55.2 366 100.27%55.2 103.5 33
2019 54.8 365 100.00%54.8 155.0 47
2021 52.9 365 100.00%52.9 361.5 61
2022 54.7 365 100.00%54.7 150.0 56
2023 52.1 362 99.18%52.1 118.5 32
Freeze index
ATTACHMENT D3
DETERMINATION OF PARAMETERS AT A 200-YEAR
RECURRENCE INTERVAL

ATTACHMENT D3.1
MEAN ANNUAL TEMPERATURE AT 200-YEAR
RECURRENCE INTERVAL

Project No.110444
Project Name:Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Closure Design
Calculated By:
n= 41
Year
Average
Temperature Rank
Recurrence
interval Probability
Standard
Variate
2014 51.0 1 42.0 0.02 3.73
1976 52.0 2 21.0 0.05 3.02
1974 52.1 3 14.0 0.08 2.60
1975 52.2 4 10.5 0.11 2.30
1979 52.8 5 8.4 0.14 2.07
1991 53.0 6 7.0 0.17 1.87
2013 53.2 7 6.0 0.20 1.70
1977 53.4 8 5.3 0.24 1.55
2010 53.5 9 4.7 0.27 1.42
1983 53.6 10 4.2 0.31 1.30
1994 53.7 11 3.8 0.35 1.19
2021 53.8 12 3.5 0.40 1.09
1992 53.9 13 3.2 0.45 0.99
1985 53.9 14 3.0 0.50 0.90
2023 54.2 15 2.8 0.56 0.82
1980 54.2 16 2.6 0.62 0.73 Y -1.3148 x+55.381
1993 54.2 17 2.5 0.68 0.66 Recurrence interval Standard Variate
Average
Temperature
2016 54.4 18 2.3 0.75 0.58 42 3.73 50.5
2019 54.4 19 2.2 0.83 0.51 50 3.90 50.3
1988 54.5 20 2.1 0.91 0.44 75 4.31 49.7
1984 54.6 21 2.0 1.00 0.37 100 4.60 49.3
2022 54.7 22 1.9 1.10 0.30 125 4.82 49.0
1987 54.7 23 1.8 1.21 0.23 150 5.01 48.8
1998 54.8 24 1.8 1.33 0.17 175 5.16 48.6
2011 55.1 25 1.7 1.47 0.10 200 5.30 48.4
1999 55.3 26 1.6 1.63 0.04
2006 55.3 27 1.6 1.80 -0.03
2018 55.4 28 1.5 2.00 -0.09
2008 55.5 29 1.4 2.23 -0.16
2007 55.5 30 1.4 2.50 -0.23
1982 55.6 31 1.4 2.82 -0.29
1986 56.1 32 1.3 3.20 -0.36
2012 56.5 33 1.3 3.67 -0.43
1990 56.5 34 1.2 4.25 -0.51
2009 56.5 35 1.2 5.00 -0.58
1995 56.6 36 1.2 6.00 -0.67
1996 56.6 37 1.1 7.40 -0.76
1989 56.8 38 1.1 9.50 -0.86
1981 56.9 39 1.1 13.00 -0.97
1978 57.0 40 1.1 20.00 -1.11
2000 57.5 41 1.0 41.00 -1.32
Mean Annual Temperature Distribution
Best Fit
n= number of observations
David B Smith EIT
y = -1.3148x + 55.381
47.0
48.0
49.0
50.0
51.0
52.0
53.0
54.0
55.0
56.0
57.0
58.0
-2.00 -1.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00
Av
e
r
a
g
e

A
n
n
u
a
l

T
e
m
p
Standard Variate
DATA Bestfit Linear (DATA)
ATTACHMENT D3.2
FROST INDEX AT 200-YEAR RECURRENCE
INTERVAL

Project No.110444
Project Name:Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Closure Design
Calculated By:David B Smith EIT
n= number of observations
n= 41
Year Frost index Rank
Recurrence
interval Probability
Standard
Variate
1979 1107 1 42.00 0.02 3.73
1991 940 2 21.00 0.05 3.02
2014 801.47 3 14.00 0.08 2.60
2013 680 4 10.50 0.11 2.30
1992 835.5 5 8.40 0.14 2.07
1974 761.5 6 7.00 0.17 1.87
1988 634.5 7 6.00 0.20 1.70
1989 714 8 5.25 0.24 1.55
1980 468.5 9 4.67 0.27 1.42
1977 460.5 10 4.20 0.31 1.30
2009 395.5 11 3.82 0.35 1.19
2010 417.5 12 3.50 0.40 1.09
1975 398 13 3.23 0.45 0.99
1984 411.5 14 3.00 0.50 0.90
1987 399 15 2.80 0.56 0.82
2021 361.5 16 2.63 0.62 0.73
1976 358 17 2.47 0.68 0.66
1993 295 18 2.33 0.75 0.58
1982 346.5 19 2.21 0.83 0.51 Y 219.58 x+229.86
1985 304.5 20 2.10 0.91 0.44 Recurrence interval Standard Variate Frost Index
2008 280 21 2.00 1.00 0.37 42 3.73 1047.9
2011 216 22 1.91 1.10 0.30 50 3.90 1086.6
2016 262 23 1.83 1.21 0.23 75 4.31 1176.4
1999 94 24 1.75 1.33 0.17 100 4.60 1240.0
1983 185.5 25 1.68 1.47 0.10 125 4.82 1289.2
1994 190 26 1.62 1.63 0.04 150 5.01 1329.4
1990 207.5 27 1.56 1.80 -0.03 175 5.16 1363.3
2019 155 28 1.50 2.00 -0.09 200 5.30 1392.7
2006 114 29 1.45 2.23 -0.16
2022 150 30 1.40 2.50 -0.23
2007 224.5 31 1.35 2.82 -0.29
2023 118.5 32 1.31 3.20 -0.36
2012 146 33 1.27 3.67 -0.43
2018 103.5 34 1.24 4.25 -0.51
2000 187 35 1.20 5.00 -0.58
1986 139 36 1.17 6.00 -0.67
1996 105 37 1.14 7.40 -0.76
1998 205 38 1.11 9.50 -0.86
1995 33.5 39 1.08 13.00 -0.97
1978 102.5 40 1.05 20.00 -1.11
1981 15 41 1.02 41.00 -1.32
Frost Index Distribution
Best Fit
y = 219.58x + 229.86
-200.0
0.0
200.0
400.0
600.0
800.0
1000.0
1200.0
1400.0
1600.0
-2.00 -1.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00
Fr
e
s
t

I
n
d
e
x

(
D
e
g
r
e
e
-
D
a
y
)
Standard Variate
ATTACHMENT D3.3
DURATION OF FREEZE SEASON AT 200-YEAR
RECURRENCE INTERVAL
Project No.110444
Project Name:Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Closure Design
Calculated By:David B Smith EIT
n= number of observations
n= 41
Year Duration Rank
Recurrence
interval Probability
Standard
Variate
1984 84.0 1 42.00 0.02 3.73
1974 83.0 2 21.00 0.05 3.02
1989 78.0 3 14.00 0.08 2.60
1991 75.0 4 10.50 0.11 2.30
1979 71.0 5 8.40 0.14 2.07
1977 70.0 6 7.00 0.17 1.87
2010 70.0 7 6.00 0.20 1.70
1976 70.0 8 5.25 0.24 1.55
2007 70.0 9 4.67 0.27 1.42
1985 69.0 10 4.20 0.31 1.30
1988 68.0 11 3.82 0.35 1.19
2016 68.0 12 3.50 0.40 1.09
1994 68.0 13 3.23 0.45 0.99
2014 65.0 14 3.00 0.50 0.90
1990 65.0 15 2.80 0.56 0.82 Y 14.738 x+45.223
1992 64.0 16 2.63 0.62 0.73 Recurrence interval Standard Variate durations
2021 61.0 17 2.47 0.68 0.66 42 3.73 100.1
1975 60.0 18 2.33 0.75 0.58 50 3.90 102.7
2008 58.0 19 2.21 0.83 0.51 75 4.31 108.8
1982 56.0 20 2.10 0.91 0.44 100 4.60 113.0
2022 56.0 21 2.00 1.00 0.37 125 4.82 116.3
1993 51.0 22 1.91 1.10 0.30 150 5.01 119.0
2011 51.0 23 1.83 1.21 0.23 175 5.16 121.3
1978 51.0 24 1.75 1.33 0.17 200 5.30 123.3
1987 50.0 25 1.68 1.47 0.10
1980 47.0 26 1.62 1.63 0.04
2019 47.0 27 1.56 1.80 -0.03
2012 46.0 28 1.50 2.00 -0.09
2013 45.0 29 1.45 2.23 -0.16
1998 41.0 30 1.40 2.50 -0.23
2009 39.0 31 1.35 2.82 -0.29
1986 39.0 32 1.31 3.20 -0.36
2018 34.0 33 1.27 3.67 -0.43
1996 33.0 34 1.24 4.25 -0.51
2023 33.0 35 1.20 5.00 -0.58
1983 32.0 36 1.17 6.00 -0.67
2006 29.0 37 1.14 7.40 -0.76
1995 27.0 38 1.11 9.50 -0.86
1999 26.0 39 1.08 13.00 -0.97
2000 22.0 40 1.05 20.00 -1.11
1981 11.0 41 1.02 41.00 -1.32
Duration of Freeze Distribution
Best Fit
y = 14.738x + 45.223
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
140.0
-2.00 -1.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00
Du
r
a
t
i
o
n

(
D
a
y
s
)
Standard Variate
DATA Bestfit Linear (DATA)
ATTACHMENT D4
FROST DEPTH DETERMINATION
Layer Optimum Dry Density
(PCF)
Water
content (%)dry density
Thermal
Conductivity Kf
(BTU/ Ft hr F)
Thermal
Conductivity Ku
(BTU/ Ft hr F)
Total Thermal
Conductivity (1/2*(
Ku+Kf))
Volumetric
Heat
Capacity
(Cavg)
Latent heat
of fusion
Depth
(Inches)
Mulch 119.3 6 101.405 85% proctor 0.62 0.81 0.71 21.8 876.14 12
Pediment 119.3 6 101.405 85% proctor 0.62 0.81 0.71 21.8 876.14 28
Sand 114.6 6 97.41 85% proctor 0.54 0.74 0.64 20.9 841.62 0
n-factor 0.7
Avg temp F Duration Vs Vo Thermal ratio Fusion parameter eqn 52 eqn 53 Lambda parameter
K Ci L Thickness ft Ci average Li average Ri Ri/2 Sum Ri-1 Ati
Mulch Layer 48.4 1392.7 123 7.9 16.4 2.08 0.20 0.71 21.8 876.1 1.00 21.8 876.1 0.64 1.40 0.70 0.00 89.12
Pediment 48.4 1392.7 123 7.9 16.4 2.08 0.20 0.71 21.8 876.1 2.33 21.8 876.1 0.64 3.27 1.63 1.40 901.08
Sand Layer 48.4 1392.7 123 7.9 16.4 2.08 0.20 0.64 20.9 841.6 0.00 21.8 876.1 0.64 0.00 0.00 4.67 0.00
974.90 Total FT 3.33 990.20
total inches 40
APPENDIX E
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
RADON COVER DESIGN AND ANALYSES

November 7, 2023 1 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

1.0 INTRODUCTION
This technical memorandum presents the results of modeling of emanation of radon-222 from the
top surface of the proposed cover over the Tailings Storage Facility (TSF). These results comprise
an update of radon eattachmanation modeling presented in Hydro-Engineering (2005). This
update is based on a revised cover design, updated information regarding the expected ore grade,
and cover material and tailings testing conducted in 2008 and 2023.

The cover system design consists of a four-layer soil cover system over tailings, with a total
thickness of approximately 96 inches (8 feet) as shown on Figure E-1. The final cover system
will consist of the following layers from top to bottom:

· 12 inches of rock mulch cover for erosion protection;
· 42 inches of onsite pediment soils for biointrusion and frost protection;
· 12 inches of sand for a capillary break;
· 12 inches of clay layer to minimize infiltration and emanation of radon gas; and
· A minimum of 18 inches of interim cover above the tailings.

For the radon emanation modeling, the rock mulch layer was not included.

The radon emanation modeling shows that the planned cover system reduces the rate of radon
emanation to values below the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) limit of 20 picocuries per
square meter per second (pCi/m2-sec) averaged over the entire TSF.

Technical Memorandum

To: Anfields Resources Holding Corp.

From: Jason Andrews, P.E.
Company: Anfield Resources Holding Corp. Date: November 7, 2023
EA No.: 110444

Re: Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Reclamation
and Decommissioning Plan. – Radon Cover Design
and Analyses
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Radon Cover Design and Analyses
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

November 7, 2023 2

2.0 DESCRIPTION OF MODEL AND INPUT VALUES
Radon emanation calculations for the cover system were made based on the RADON model
(NRC, 1989), a one-dimensional model that calculates radon flux from decay of a radium-226
source (such as the tailings). As part of the NRC Radon Barrier Workshop (June 25-26, 2018),
the NRC indicates that the RADON modeling code (RAECOM) is available at the Wise Uranium
Project website http://www.wise-uranium.org/ctc.html. The Wise Uranium Project Uranium Mill
Tailings Cover Calculator was used to model the proposed cover system. The key input
parameters to the model include the radium-226 activity concentration, the coefficient of
diffusion of radon through the cover materials, and the density and moisture content values for
the cover materials that affect the diffusion of radon. The input parameters and values used in the
model are outlined below.

2.1 Radium Activity Concentrations
The radium-226 activity concentration values used in the model are outlined below.

Tailings. The radium-226 activity concentration value for the tailings was estimated using NRC
Regulatory Guide 3.64 (1989). The guide presents a method for estimating the radium-226 activity
by multiplying the ore grade by 2812 pCi/g. The estimated ore grade for ore to be processed at the
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility in the future is 0.29 U3O8 from Table 1.1 of the 2023 Anfield
Preliminary Economic Assessment (Anfield Energy, Inc, 2023). Using an ore grade of 0.29 U3O8,
the estimated radium-226 activity is 815 pCi/g, and this value was used herein to calculate radon
flux.

The average grade of the ore that was processed through the mill to produce the existing tailings
was 0.15% U3O8 and the average radium-226 activity for the existing tailings of 78.8 pCi/g. Thus,
the estimated ore grade and radium-226 activity of the tailings for future operations are much
higher than for the historical operations. Prior to final reclamation, the radium-226 activity of the
tailings will be measured and the results will be used to update the radon modeling and to
reevaluate the cover design.

Cover materials. For the grading sand layer, clay layer, sand layer, and pediment soil layer, a
radium-226 activity concentration value of zero pCi/g was used. More information regarding the
cover material borrow locations, and laboratory testing results is provided in the main text of the
EA Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan.

2.2 Radon Emanation Coefficient
For the tailings and all cover materials, a radon emanation coefficient of 0.35 was used. This is
the conservative, default value used in the RADON model.

2.3 Density and Porosity
The densities of the tailings and cover materials used in the model are based on laboratory results
and typical values. For the tailings, a typical value of 1.31g/cc was used (Advanced Terra Testing,
2008). For the capillary break and interim cover a value of 1.56 g/cc was used which is equivalent
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Radon Cover Design and Analyses
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

November 7, 2023 3

to 90 percent of the minimum value for the standard Proctor maximum dry density measured for
the on-site sands provided in Attachment E1.2. For the clay layer, a value of 1.73 g/cc was used
which is equivalent to 95 percent of the average measured standard Proctor dry density of the
clay sample from EA-TP4 collected from the proposed clay borrow area in March 2023
(Attachment E.1.2).

The porosity values for the tailings and clay layer were estimated from the dry densities based on
typical specific gravities. For the sand and pediment layers a porosity of 0.37 was calculated.
The porosity for the tested clay borrow sample from EA-TP4 was calculated to be 0.36.

2.4 Long-Term Moisture Content
The long-term, 15-bar, moisture content of the clay layer was determined to be 21.9 percent from
EA-TP4 collected from the proposed borrow area in March 2023 (Attachment E.1.2.). The long
term, 15-bar, moisture content for the tailings was obtained from the design report (Tetra Tech,
2008). The long-term moisture content for the interim cover, capillary break, and frost protection
layer were assumed to be 6% based on the NRC guidance (1989). The test results are provided
in Attachments E.1.1 and E.1.2.

2.5 Radon Diffusion Coefficient
The radon diffusion coefficient was calculated within the model (based on an empirical
relationship with degree of saturation). The values that were used are provided in the results
provided in Attachment E2. The lower the diffusion coefficient value, the lower the resulting rate
of radon emanation.

3.0 RESULTS
The input values and results from the modeling are summarized in Table E-1. The model output
is provided in Attachment E2.

The radon emanation model results presented in Table E-1 above show that the cover system
reduces the rate of radon-222 emanation to zero at the top of the radon barrier which is in
compliance with the NRC allowable emanation of less than 20 pCi/m2-sec.

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Radon Cover Design and Analyses
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

November 7, 2023 4

REFERENCES
Advanced Terra Testing. (2008). Shootaring Canyon Laboratory Testing Results, Dated August
20.

Anfield Energy, Inc. (2023). The Shootaring Canyon Mill and Velvet-Wood and Slick Rock
Uranium Projects, Preliminary Economic Assessment National Instrument 43-101.
Dated May 6.

Hydro-Engineering, LLC. (2005). Tailings Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan for
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Project, Garfield County, Utah. December 2005, revised
December 2006.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). (1989). Calculation of Radon Flux Attenuation by
Earthen Uranium Mill Tailings Covers, Regulatory Guide 3.64.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). (2018). Proceedings of the Radon Barriers Workshop.
Dated July 25-26. NRC Headquarters, Rockville, MD.

Tetra Tech, Inc. (2008). Final Draft - Shootaring Canyon Uranium Mill Tailings Facility Design
Report. May 27, Revised December 2008

Enclosures

LIST OF TABLES

Table E-1 Soil Inputs & Radon Flux

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure E-1 Final Reclamation Cover System

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

Attachment E1 Material Testing Results
Attachment E1.1 Historical Material Testing Results
Attachment E1.2 2023 Material Testing Results
Attachment E2 Radon Model Output

TABLE

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Radon Cover Design and Analyses
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.

November 7, 2023 5 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

Table E-1 – Soil Inputs & Radon Flux
Layer
No Layer Description
Thickness
Porosity
(%)

Dry
Density
(g/cm^3)
Initial
Water
Content
(%)
Radium-226
Activity
(pCi/gm)
Emanation
Coefficient
15-Bar
Moisture
Content
(%)
Radon
Flux
pCi/m^2/s (cm) (in)
6 Rock Mulch(6) 30.5 12 0.37(3) 1.62(3)
101.4 (pcf) 11.1(3) 0 0.35 6(5) 0
5
Pediment Layer
(Frost
Protection and
Biointrusion)
106.7 42 0.37
(3) 1.62(3)
101.4 (pcf) 11.1(3) 0 0.35 6(5) 0
4 Sand Layer
(Capillary Break) 41.7 12 0.41(3) 1.56(3)
97.4 (pcf) 10.8(3) 0 0.35 6(5) 0
3 Clay Layer
(Radon Barrier) 45.7 12 0.36(2) 1.73(2)
107.9 (pcf) 15.1(2) 0 0.35 21.9 (2)
4.8
2 Interim Cover
(Sand) 30.5 18 0.41(3) 1.56(3)
97.4 (pcf) 10.8(3) 0 0.35 6(5)
197.5
1 Tailings 500.0 197 0.48
(1) 1.31(1)
81.5 (pcf) 18.8(1) 815 0.35 17.16(1) -
Notes:
1 - Data obtained from August 2008 Advanced Terra Testing, Inc. (2008) provided in Attachment E.1.1 of this report.
2 – Data obtained from DBS&A 2023 testing of clay borrow material, using TP-4 as selected sample.
3 – Data obtained from testing of pediment and aeolian sand material.
4 – From Table 4-4 of Tetra Tech Design Report (2008) (Testing completed by Tetra Tech).
5 - Long term moisture content NRC (1989).
6 – Rock mulch is 25% 2-in minus and 75% pediment soils, therefore the pediment soil properties control for modeling. Note: Layer 6 was not included in the
Radon attenuation model because it is used as an erosion protection layer.
FIGURE

PEDIMENT SOIL LAYER
(BIOINTRUSION AND FROST PROTECTION)
SAND LAYER
(CAPILLARY BREAK)
CLAY LAYER (RADON BARRIER)
INTERIM COVER
TAILINGS
12"
42"
12"
18" MIN.
ROCK MULCH (EROSION PROTECTION)12"
NOT TO SCALE
Project No. 110444 October 2023
FIGURE E-1
FINAL RECLAMATION COVER SYSTEM
SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM FACILITY
Engineering Analytics, Inc.
ATTACHMENT E1
MATERIAL TESTING RESULTS
ATTACHMENT E1.1
HISTORICAL MATERIAL TESTING RESULTS

Tetra Tech
101
102
103
104
105
051015202530
Su
c
t
i
o
n

(
k
P
a
)
Gravimetric Water Content (%)
1,500 kPa (15 bars)
15.3 %

Soil-Water Characteristic Curve for
Radon Barrier Clay
(Jmb Green)

ATTACHMENT E1.2
2023 MATERIAL TESTING RESULTS

JOB NAME:DATE: 4/14/2023
EA-TP1
3" - 28" Shelby
16.8 94.3 --
3" - 36" Bucket
-- 14 / 41 / 27 -
EA-TP2
3" - 24" Shelby
21.8 79.0 --
0.5' - 2' Bucket
-- 25 / 75 / 50 -
EA-TP3
0' - 2' Bucket
-- 18 / 72 / 54 -
N/A Shelby
26.9 79.9 --
EA-TP4
0' - 3' Bucket
-- 13 / 32 / 19 -
0.5' - 2.5' Shelby
15.2 97.9 --
EA-TP5
0' - 2.5' Bucket
-- 16 / 48 / 32 -
1' - 3' Shelby
14.1 101.9 --
*PL = Plastic Limit LL = Liquid Limit PI = Plasticity Index N.P. = Non Plastic; (1) = See Attached
Shootering Rec Plan JOB NUMBER: 110444
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
Depth (ft.)Sample
Type
Moisture
(%)
Dry Density
(pcf)
Soil Water Characteristics Curve
(SWCC)
Atterberg
Limits
PL/LL/PI
JOB NAME:DATE: 4/14/2023Shootering Rec Plan JOB NUMBER: 110444
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
Depth (ft.)Sample
Type
Moisture
(%)
Dry Density
(pcf)
Soil Water Characteristics Curve
(SWCC)
Atterberg
Limits
PL/LL/PI
EA-TP6
0" - 8" Bucket
-- 24 / 78 / 54 -
8" - 84" Bucket
-- 25 / 68 / 43 -
EA-TP7
0' - 1.5' Bucket
-- 24 / 69 / 45 -
0' - 1.5' Shelby
32.0 80.6 --
EA-TP8
0 - 1.5' Bucket
-- 15 / 38 / 23 -
3" - 18" Shelby
18.9 94.2 --
1.5' - 7' Bucket
-- 24 / 62 / 38 -
EA-TP9
1' - 2' Shelby
19.4 79.9 --
*PL = Plastic Limit LL = Liquid Limit PI = Plasticity Index N.P. = Non Plastic; (1) = See Attached
Laboratory Report
Shootering Closure Design,
110444
Prepared for
Engineering Analytics, Inc.

Prepared by

DBS&A Soil Testing & Research Laboratory
4400 Alameda Blvd. NE, Suite C
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87113
[phone]
www.dbstephens.com
DB23.1131.00
June 16, 2023

4400 Alameda Boulevard NE, Suite C [phone]
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87113 www.dbstephens.com
June 16, 2023
Jason Andrews
Engineering Analytics, Inc.
1600 Specht Point Rd., Suite 209
Fort Collins, CO 80526
[phone]

Re: DBS&A Laboratory Report for Project #110444, Shootering Closure Design
Dear Jason Andrews:
Enclosed is the report for the requested laboratory services. Please review this report and
provide any comments as samples will be held for a maximum of 30 days. After 30 days
samples will be returned or disposed of in an appropriate manner.
All testing results were evaluated subjectively for consistency and reasonableness, and the
results appear to be reasonably representative of the material tested. However, DBS&A does
not assume any responsibility for interpretations or analyses based on the data enclosed, nor
can we guarantee that these data are fully representative of the undisturbed materials at the
field site. We recommend that careful evaluation of these laboratory results be made for your
particular application.
The testing utilized to generate the enclosed report employs methods that are standard for the
industry. The results do not constitute a professional opinion by DBS&A, nor can the results
affect any professional or expert opinions rendered with respect thereto by DBS&A. You have
acknowledged that all the testing undertaken by us, and the report provided, constitutes mere
test results using standardized methods, and cannot be used to disqualify DBS&A from
rendering any professional or expert opinion, having waived any claim of conflict of interest
by DBS&A.
We are pleased to provide this service and look forward to future laboratory testing on other
projects. If you have any questions about the enclosed data, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
DANIEL B. STEPHENS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SOIL TESTING & RESEARCH LABORATORY
Joleen Hines
Laboratory Manager

Summaries
3
Summary of Tests Performed
Saturated
Initial Soil Hydraulic Moisture Particle Specific Air
Laboratory Properties 1 Conductivity2 Characteristics 3 Size4 Gravity5 Perm- Atterberg Proctor
Sample Number G VM VD CH FH FW HC PP FP DPP RH EP WHC
Kunsat DS WS H F C eability Limits Compaction
EA-TP3 (95%) X X X X X X X
EA-TP4 (95%) X X X X X X X
EA-TP6 (95%) X X X X X X X
EA-TP8 (95%) X X X X X X X
1 G = Gravimetric Moisture Content, VM = Volume Measurement Method, VD = Volume Displacement Method
2 CH = Constant Head Rigid Wall, FH = Falling Head Rigid Wall, FW = Falling Head Rising Tail Flexible Wall
3 HC = Hanging Column, PP = Pressure Plate, FP = Filter Paper, DPP = Dew Point Potentiometer, RH = Relative Humidity Box,
EP = Effective Porosity, WHC = Water Holding Capacity, Kunsat = Calculated Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity
4 DS = Dry Sieve, WS = Wet Sieve, H = Hydrometer
5 F = Fine (<4.75mm), C = Coarse (>4.75mm)
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
4
Notes
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
Sample Receipt:
Four samples, each as loose material in a full resealable 1-gallon bag, were received on
April 26, 2023. The samples were packaged together in a 5-gallon bucket with packing
material and all samples were received in good order.
Sample Preparation and Testing Notes:
A portion of each sample was remolded into a testing ring to target 95% of the respective
maximum dry bulk density at the respective optimum moisture content, based on standard
proctor compaction testing results provided by the requestor. The actual percentage of
maximum dry bulk density achieved was added to each sub-sample ID. Each of these
remolded sub-samples was subjected to initial properties analysis, saturation, and the
hanging column and pressure chamber portions of the moisture retention testing.
Secondary sub-samples were then prepared using the same target remold parameters.
The secondary sub-samples were extruded from the preparation ring and subjected to
saturated hydraulic conductivity testing via the flexible wall method. Separate sub-
samples were obtained for the dewpoint potentiometer and relative humidity chamber
portions of the moisture retention testing.
Porosity calculations are based on the use of an assumed specific gravity value of either
2.7 or 2.75.
5
Opt.
Moist.
Cont.
Max.
Dry
Density
Max.
Dry
Density
Moist.
Cont.
Dry
Bulk
Density
Dry
Bulk
Density
% of
Max.
Density
Moist.
Cont.
Dry
Bulk
Density
Dry
Bulk
Density
% of
Max.
Density
Dry
Bulk
Density
Dry
Bulk
Density
%
Volume
Change
% of
Max.
Density
Dry
Bulk
Density
Dry
Bulk
Density
%
Volume
Change
% of
Max.
Density
Sample ID (%, g/g) (g/cm
3) (pcf) (%, g/g) (g/cm
3) (pcf) (%) (%, g/g) (g/cm
3) (pcf) (%) (g/cm
3) (pcf) (%) (%) (g/cm
3)(pcf) (%) (%)
EA-TP3
(95%)25.0 1.48 92.6 25.0 1.41 88.0 95% 24.4 1.42 88.4 95.4% 1.35 84.5 +4.6% 91.3% 1.33 83.0 +6.4% 89.7%
EA-TP4
(95%)15.1 1.82 113.6 15.1 1.73 107.9 95% 15.1 1.73 108.1 95.1% 1.73 108.1 --- 95.1% 1.73 108.1 --- 95.1%
EA-TP6
(95%)30.2 1.35 84.4 30.2 1.28 80.2 95% 29.9 1.29 80.5 95.4% 1.24 77.6 +3.7% 92.0% 1.20 74.9 +7.4% 88.8%
EA-TP8
(95%)25.4 1.53 95.3 25.4 1.45 90.5 95% 26.2 1.44 90.2 94.6% 1.41 88.1 +2.3% 92.5% 1.40 87.3 +3.3% 91.6%
Summary of Sample Preparation/Volume Changes
Proctor Data Target Remold Parameters1 Actual Remold Data
Volume Change
Post Saturation2
Volume Change
Post Drying Curve3
1Target Remold Parameters: 95% of maximum dry density at optimum moisture content, based on standard proctor compaction data provided by the requestor.
2Volume Change Post Saturation: Volume change measurements were obtained after saturated hydraulic conductivity testing.
3Volume Change Post Drying Curve: Volume change measurements were obtained throughout hanging column and pressure plate testing. The 'Volume Change Post
Drying Curve' values represent the final sample dimensions after the last pressure plate point.
Notes:
"+" indicates sample swelling, "-" indicates sample settling, and "---" indicates no volume change occurred.
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
6
Summary of Initial Moisture Content, Dry Bulk Density
Wet Bulk Density and Calculated Porosity
Moisture Content
As Received Remolded Dry Bulk Wet Bulk Calculated
Gravimetric Volumetric Gravimetric Volumetric Density Density Porosity
Sample Number (%, g/g)(%, cm3/cm3)(%, g/g)(%, cm3/cm3)(g/cm3)(g/cm3)(%)
EA-TP3 (95%) NA NA 24.4 34.6 1.42 1.76 47.6
EA-TP4 (95%) NA NA 15.1 26.2 1.73 1.99 35.9
EA-TP6 (95%) NA NA 29.9 38.5 1.29 1.67 53.1
EA-TP8 (95%) NA NA 26.2 37.8 1.44 1.82 47.5
NA = Not analyzed
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
7
Summary of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity Tests
Oversize
Corrected Method of Analysis
Sample Number
Ksat
(cm/sec)
Ksat
(cm/sec)
Constant Head
Flexible Wall
Falling Head
Flexible Wall
EA-TP3 (95%) 2.3E-08 NA X
EA-TP4 (95%) 8.5E-07 NA X
EA-TP6 (95%) 7.7E-08 NA X
EA-TP8 (95%) 1.2E-06 NA X
NA = Not applicable
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
8
Summary of Moisture Characteristics
of the Initial Drainage Curve
Pressure Head Moisture Content
Sample Number (-cm water)(%, cm3/cm3)
EA-TP3 (95%) 0 49.5
‡‡
64 48.6 ‡‡
149 47.3 ‡‡
337 47.3 ‡‡
1530 46.9 ‡‡
14685 31.7 ‡‡
54457 24.0 ‡‡
174590 17.9 ‡‡
533151 13.4 ‡‡
852439 11.5 ‡‡
EA-TP4 (95%)0 36.2
24 36.2
75 34.4
152 31.7
337 30.1
26719 15.7
85969 12.4
193150 10.1
472065 8.0
852439 6.4
EA-TP6 (95%)0 55.2 ‡‡
64 56.1 ‡‡
149 56.0 ‡‡
337 55.8 ‡‡
1530 55.6 ‡‡
15297 33.4 ‡‡
47625 23.7 ‡‡
195904 17.4 ‡‡
592708 13.9 ‡‡
852439 12.8 ‡‡
EA-TP8 (95%)0 47.8 ‡‡
18 48.5 ‡‡
53 48.2 ‡‡
128 44.6 ‡‡
337 42.4 ‡‡
100348 17.2 ‡‡
174692 15.6 ‡‡
452893 13.0 ‡‡
662870 11.5 ‡‡
852439 10.8 ‡‡
‡‡ Volume adjustments are applicable at this matric potential (see data sheet for this sample).
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
9
Summary of Calculated Unsaturated Hydraulic Properties
Oversize Corrected
Sample Number
α
(cm-1)
N
(dimensionless)
θr
(% vol)
θs
(% vol)
θr
(% vol)
θs
(% vol)
EA-TP3 (95%) 0.0003 1.2583 0.00 48.58 NA NA
EA-TP4 (95%) 0.0065 1.1790 0.00 36.27 NA NA
EA-TP6 (95%) 0.0003 1.2819 0.00 56.57 NA NA
EA-TP8 (95%) 0.0042 1.1762 0.00 48.39 NA NA
NA = Not applicable
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
10
Initial Properties
11
Data for Initial Moisture Content,
Bulk Density, Porosity, and Percent Saturation
Job Name:Engineering Analytics, Inc.
Job Number:DB23.1131.00
Sample Number:EA-TP3 (95%)
Project Number:110444
Project Name:Shootering Closure Design
As Received Remolded
Test Date:NA 28-Apr-23
Field weight* of sample (g):524.57
Tare weight, ring (g):137.38
Tare weight, pan/plate (g):0.00
Tare weight, other (g):0.00
Dry weight of sample (g):311.13
Sample volume (cm3):219.82
Assumed particle density (g/cm3):2.70
Gravimetric Moisture Content (% g/g):24.4
Volumetric Moisture Content (% vol):34.6
Dry bulk density (g/cm3):1.42
Wet bulk density (g/cm3):1.76
Calculated Porosity (% vol):47.6
Percent Saturation:72.7
Laboratory analysis by:D. O'Dowd
Data entered by:D. O'Dowd
Checked by:J. Hines
Comments:
* Weight including tares
NA = Not applicable
--- = This sample was not remolded
12
Data for Initial Moisture Content,
Bulk Density, Porosity, and Percent Saturation
Job Name:Engineering Analytics, Inc.
Job Number:DB23.1131.00
Sample Number:EA-TP4 (95%)
Project Number:110444
Project Name:Shootering Closure Design
As Received Remolded
Test Date:NA 28-Apr-23
Field weight* of sample (g):581.13
Tare weight, ring (g):138.07
Tare weight, pan/plate (g):0.00
Tare weight, other (g):0.00
Dry weight of sample (g):384.85
Sample volume (cm3):222.33
Assumed particle density (g/cm3):2.70
Gravimetric Moisture Content (% g/g):15.1
Volumetric Moisture Content (% vol):26.2
Dry bulk density (g/cm3):1.73
Wet bulk density (g/cm3):1.99
Calculated Porosity (% vol):35.9
Percent Saturation:73.0
Laboratory analysis by:D. O'Dowd
Data entered by:D. O'Dowd
Checked by:J. Hines
Comments:
* Weight including tares
NA = Not applicable
--- = This sample was not remolded
13
Data for Initial Moisture Content,
Bulk Density, Porosity, and Percent Saturation
Job Name:Engineering Analytics, Inc.
Job Number:DB23.1131.00
Sample Number:EA-TP6 (95%)
Project Number:110444
Project Name:Shootering Closure Design
As Received Remolded
Test Date:NA 28-Apr-23
Field weight* of sample (g):509.10
Tare weight, ring (g):137.91
Tare weight, pan/plate (g):0.00
Tare weight, other (g):0.00
Dry weight of sample (g):285.85
Sample volume (cm3):221.73
Assumed particle density (g/cm3):2.75
Gravimetric Moisture Content (% g/g):29.9
Volumetric Moisture Content (% vol):38.5
Dry bulk density (g/cm3):1.29
Wet bulk density (g/cm3):1.67
Calculated Porosity (% vol):53.1
Percent Saturation:72.5
Laboratory analysis by:D. O'Dowd
Data entered by:D. O'Dowd
Checked by:J. Hines
Comments:
* Weight including tares
NA = Not applicable
--- = This sample was not remolded
14
Data for Initial Moisture Content,
Bulk Density, Porosity, and Percent Saturation
Job Name:Engineering Analytics, Inc.
Job Number:DB23.1131.00
Sample Number:EA-TP8 (95%)
Project Number:110444
Project Name:Shootering Closure Design
As Received Remolded
Test Date:NA 28-Apr-23
Field weight* of sample (g):538.55
Tare weight, ring (g):136.69
Tare weight, pan/plate (g):0.00
Tare weight, other (g):0.00
Dry weight of sample (g):318.47
Sample volume (cm3):220.50
Assumed particle density (g/cm3):2.75
Gravimetric Moisture Content (% g/g):26.2
Volumetric Moisture Content (% vol):37.8
Dry bulk density (g/cm3):1.44
Wet bulk density (g/cm3):1.82
Calculated Porosity (% vol):47.5
Percent Saturation:79.6
Laboratory analysis by:D. O'Dowd
Data entered by:D. O'Dowd
Checked by:J. Hines
Comments:
* Weight including tares
NA = Not applicable
--- = This sample was not remolded
15
Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity
16
Job Name:Eng. Analytics (4-23)
Job Number:DB23.1131.00
Sample Number:EA-TP3 (95%)
Project:NA
Job Number:NA
Initial Mass (g):387.02 Saturated Mass (g):426.34 Permeant liquid used:Tap Water
Diameter (cm):6.087 Dry Mass (g):307.7 Sample Preparation:
Length (cm):7.566 Diameter (cm):6.233
Area (cm 2 ):29.10 Length (cm):7.649 Number of Lifts:3
Volume (cm 3 ):220.17 Deformation (%)**:1.09 Split:#4
Dry Density (g/cm 3 ):1.40 Area (cm 2 ):30.51 Percent Coarse Material (%):0.0
Dry Density (pcf):87.2 Volume (cm 3 ):233.40 Particle Density(g/cm 3 ):2.7
Water Content (%, g/g):25.8 Dry Density (g/cm 3 ):1.32 Cell pressure (PSI):83.0
Water Content (%, vol):36.0 Dry Density (pcf):82.3 Influent pressure (PSI):80.0
Void Ratio (e):0.93 Water Content (%, g/g):38.6 Effluent pressure (PSI):80.0
Porosity (%, vol):48.2 Water Content (%, vol):50.8 Panel Used:
Saturation (%):74.7 Void Ratio(e):1.05 Reading:
Porosity (%, vol):51.2 Date/Time
Saturation (%)*:99.3 B-Value (% saturation) prior to test*: 0.98 6/7/23 1425
B-Value (% saturation) post to test: 0.99 6/12/23 800
* Per ASTM D5084 percent saturation is ensured (B-Value ≥ 95%) prior to testing, as post test saturation values may be exaggerated during depressurizing and sample removal.
**Percent Deformation: based on initial sample length and post permeation sample length.
Laboratory analysis by:D. O'Dowd
Data entered by:D. O'Dowd
Checked by:J. Hines
Post Permeation
Sample Properties
Remolded or Initial
Sample Properties
Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity
Flexible Wall Falling Head-Rising Tail Method
Test and Sample Conditions
D E F
Annulus Pipette
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
In situ sample, extruded
Remolded Sample
Assumed Measured
17
Job Name:Eng. Analytics (4-23)
Job Number:DB23.1131.00
Sample Number:EA-TP3 (95%)
Project:NA
Job Number:NA
Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity
Flexible Wall Falling Head-Rising Tail Method
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
Date Time
Temp
(°C)
Influent
Pipette
Reading
Effluent
Pipette
Reading
Gradient
(ΔH/ΔL)
Average
Flow (cm3)
Elapsed
Time (s)
Ratio
(outflow to
inflow)
Change in
Head (Not to
exceed 25%)
ksat T°C
(cm/s)
ksat Corrected
(cm/s)
Test # 1:
08-Jun-23 06:39:40 21.1 2.10 23.90 3.29
09-Jun-23 06:36:43 21.2 2.30 23.70 3.23
Test # 2:
09-Jun-23 06:36:43 21.2 2.30 23.70 3.23
10-Jun-23 06:39:01 21.0 2.50 23.50 3.17
Test # 3:
10-Jun-23 06:39:01 21.0 2.50 23.50 3.17
11-Jun-23 07:06:05 21.2 2.70 23.30 3.11
Test # 4:
11-Jun-23 07:06:05 21.2 2.70 23.30 3.11
12-Jun-23 07:44:20 21.6 2.90 23.10 3.05
Average Ksat (cm/sec):2.31E-08
Calculated Gravel Corrected Average Ksat (cm/sec):NA
ASTM Required Range (+/- 25%)
Ksat (-25%) (cm/s):1.73E-08
Ksat (+25%) (cm/s):2.89E-08
0.17 86223 1.00 2% 2.34E-08 2.28E-08
2.37E-08 2.31E-08
0.17 88024
0.17 86538 1.00 2%
1.00 2% 2.38E-08 2.32E-08
2.41E-08 2.33E-081.00 2%0.17 88695
1.5E-08
1.7E-08
1.9E-08
2.1E-08
2.3E-08
2.5E-08
2.7E-08
2.9E-08
3.1E-08
40000 90000 140000 190000 240000 290000 340000 390000
Ks
a
t

(
c
m
/
s
)
Time (s)
18
Job Name:Eng. Analytics (4-23)
Job Number:DB23.1131.00
Sample Number:EA-TP4 (95%)
Project:NA
Job Number:NA
Initial Mass (g):442.21 Saturated Mass (g):465.02 Permeant liquid used:Tap Water
Diameter (cm):6.098 Dry Mass (g):383.95 Sample Preparation:
Length (cm):7.595 Diameter (cm):6.105
Area (cm 2 ):29.21 Length (cm):7.609 Number of Lifts:3
Volume (cm 3 ):221.82 Deformation (%)**:0.18 Split:#4
Dry Density (g/cm 3 ):1.73 Area (cm 2 ):29.27 Percent Coarse Material (%):0.0
Dry Density (pcf):108.1 Volume (cm 3 ):222.72 Particle Density(g/cm 3 ):2.7
Water Content (%, g/g):15.2 Dry Density (g/cm 3 ):1.72 Cell pressure (PSI):83.0
Water Content (%, vol):26.3 Dry Density (pcf):107.6 Influent pressure (PSI):80.0
Void Ratio (e):0.56 Water Content (%, g/g):21.1 Effluent pressure (PSI):80.0
Porosity (%, vol):35.9 Water Content (%, vol):36.4 Panel Used:
Saturation (%):73.2 Void Ratio(e):0.57 Reading:
Porosity (%, vol):36.2 Date/Time
Saturation (%)*:100.7 B-Value (% saturation) prior to test*: 1.00 6/7/23 1425
B-Value (% saturation) post to test: 1.00 6/9/23 945
* Per ASTM D5084 percent saturation is ensured (B-Value ≥ 95%) prior to testing, as post test saturation values may be exaggerated during depressurizing and sample removal.
**Percent Deformation: based on initial sample length and post permeation sample length.
Laboratory analysis by:D. O'Dowd
Data entered by:D. O'Dowd
Checked by:J. Hines
Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity
Flexible Wall Falling Head-Rising Tail Method
Remolded or Initial
Sample Properties
Post Permeation
Sample Properties Test and Sample Conditions
D E F
Annulus Pipette
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
In situ sample, extruded
Remolded Sample
Assumed Measured
19
Job Name:Eng. Analytics (4-23)
Job Number:DB23.1131.00
Sample Number:EA-TP4 (95%)
Project:NA
Job Number:NA
Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity
Flexible Wall Falling Head-Rising Tail Method
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
Date Time
Temp
(°C)
Influent
Pipette
Reading
Effluent
Pipette
Reading
Gradient
(ΔH/ΔL)
Average
Flow (cm3)
Elapsed
Time (s)
Ratio
(outflow to
inflow)
Change in
Head (Not to
exceed 25%)
ksat T°C
(cm/s)
ksat Corrected
(cm/s)
Test # 1:
08-Jun-23 08:11:21 21.0 2.90 23.10 3.07
08-Jun-23 09:34:45 21.0 3.30 22.70 2.94
Test # 2:
08-Jun-23 09:34:45 21.0 3.30 22.70 2.94
08-Jun-23 10:31:49 21.0 3.55 22.45 2.87
Test # 3:
08-Jun-23 10:31:49 21.0 3.55 22.45 2.87
08-Jun-23 11:30:25 21.0 3.80 22.20 2.79
Test # 4:
09-Jun-23 06:35:00 21.0 3.80 22.45 2.83
09-Jun-23 07:46:21 21.0 4.10 22.15 2.74
Average Ksat (cm/sec):8.55E-07
Calculated Gravel Corrected Average Ksat (cm/sec):NA
ASTM Required Range (+/- 25%)
Ksat (-25%) (cm/s):6.41E-07
Ksat (+25%) (cm/s):1.07E-06
0.35 5004 1.00 4% 9.12E-07 8.91E-07
0.22 3424 1.00 3% 8.61E-07 8.42E-07
0.22 3516 1.00 3% 8.61E-07 8.42E-07
0.26 4281 1.00 3% 8.63E-07 8.43E-07
6.0E-07
7.0E-07
8.0E-07
9.0E-07
1.0E-06
1.1E-06
2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000
Ks
a
t

(
c
m
/
s
)
Time (s)
20
Job Name:Eng. Analytics (4-23)
Job Number:DB23.1131.00
Sample Number:EA-TP6 (95%)
Project:NA
Job Number:NA
Initial Mass (g):370.21 Saturated Mass (g):426.21 Permeant liquid used:Tap Water
Diameter (cm):6.101 Dry Mass (g):287.8 Sample Preparation:
Length (cm):7.600 Diameter (cm):6.242
Area (cm 2 ):29.23 Length (cm):7.814 Number of Lifts:3
Volume (cm 3 ):222.18 Deformation (%)**:2.74 Split:#4
Dry Density (g/cm 3 ):1.30 Area (cm 2 ):30.60 Percent Coarse Material (%):0.0
Dry Density (pcf):80.9 Volume (cm 3 ):239.12 Particle Density(g/cm 3 ):2.75
Water Content (%, g/g):28.6 Dry Density (g/cm 3 ):1.20 Cell pressure (PSI):83.0
Water Content (%, vol):37.1 Dry Density (pcf):75.1 Influent pressure (PSI):80.0
Void Ratio (e):1.12 Water Content (%, g/g):48.1 Effluent pressure (PSI):80.0
Porosity (%, vol):52.9 Water Content (%, vol):57.9 Panel Used:
Saturation (%):70.1 Void Ratio(e):1.28 Reading:
Porosity (%, vol):56.2 Date/Time
Saturation (%)*:102.9 B-Value (% saturation) prior to test*: 1.00 6/7/23 1350
B-Value (% saturation) post to test: 1.00 6/12/23 806
* Per ASTM D5084 percent saturation is ensured (B-Value ≥ 95%) prior to testing, as post test saturation values may be exaggerated during depressurizing and sample removal.
**Percent Deformation: based on initial sample length and post permeation sample length.
Laboratory analysis by:D. O'Dowd
Data entered by:D. O'Dowd
Checked by:J. Hines
Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity
Flexible Wall Falling Head-Rising Tail Method
Remolded or Initial
Sample Properties
Post Permeation
Sample Properties Test and Sample Conditions
O P Q
Annulus Pipette
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
In situ sample, extruded
Remolded Sample
Assumed Measured
21
Job Name:Eng. Analytics (4-23)
Job Number:DB23.1131.00
Sample Number:EA-TP6 (95%)
Project:NA
Job Number:NA
Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity
Flexible Wall Falling Head-Rising Tail Method
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
Date Time
Temp
(°C)
Influent
Pipette
Reading
Effluent
Pipette
Reading
Gradient
(ΔH/ΔL)
Average
Flow (cm3)
Elapsed
Time (s)
Ratio
(outflow to
inflow)
Change in
Head (Not to
exceed 25%)
ksat T°C
(cm/s)
ksat Corrected
(cm/s)
Test # 1:
08-Jun-23 06:40:36 21.1 2.40 23.60 3.13
09-Jun-23 06:29:30 21.2 3.00 23.00 2.96
Test # 2:
09-Jun-23 06:29:30 21.2 3.00 23.00 2.96
10-Jun-23 06:41:00 21.0 3.60 22.40 2.78
Test # 3:
10-Jun-23 06:41:00 21.0 3.60 22.40 2.78
11-Jun-23 07:07:15 21.2 4.20 21.80 2.60
Test # 4:
11-Jun-23 07:07:15 21.2 4.20 21.80 2.60
12-Jun-23 07:45:26 21.6 4.75 21.25 2.44
Average Ksat (cm/sec):7.74E-08
Calculated Gravel Corrected Average Ksat (cm/sec):NA
ASTM Required Range (+/- 25%)
Ksat (-25%) (cm/s):5.80E-08
Ksat (+25%) (cm/s):9.67E-08
0.52 85734 1.00 6% 7.54E-08 7.34E-08
0.52 87090 1.00 6% 7.88E-08 7.68E-08
0.52 87975 1.00 6% 8.32E-08 8.11E-08
0.48 88691 1.00 6% 8.07E-08 7.81E-08
5.0E-08
6.0E-08
7.0E-08
8.0E-08
9.0E-08
1.0E-07
40000 90000 140000 190000 240000 290000 340000 390000
Ks
a
t

(
c
m
/
s
)
Time (s)
22
Job Name:Eng. Analytics (4-23)
Job Number:DB23.1131.00
Sample Number:EA-TP8 (95%)
Project:NA
Job Number:NA
Initial Mass (g):401.31 Saturated Mass (g):432.00 Permeant liquid used:Tap Water
Diameter (cm):6.103 Dry Mass (g):318.51 Sample Preparation:
Length (cm):7.563 Diameter (cm):6.122
Area (cm 2 ):29.25 Length (cm):7.626 Number of Lifts:3
Volume (cm 3 ):221.24 Deformation (%)**:0.83 Split:#4
Dry Density (g/cm 3 ):1.44 Area (cm 2 ):29.44 Percent Coarse Material (%):0.0
Dry Density (pcf):89.9 Volume (cm 3 ):224.49 Particle Density(g/cm 3 ):2.75
Water Content (%, g/g):26.0 Dry Density (g/cm 3 ):1.42 Cell pressure (PSI):83.0
Water Content (%, vol):37.4 Dry Density (pcf):88.6 Influent pressure (PSI):80.0
Void Ratio (e):0.91 Water Content (%, g/g):35.6 Effluent pressure (PSI):80.0
Porosity (%, vol):47.6 Water Content (%, vol):50.6 Panel Used:
Saturation (%):78.5 Void Ratio(e):0.94 Reading:
Porosity (%, vol):48.4 Date/Time
Saturation (%)*:104.4 B-Value (% saturation) prior to test*: 0.99 6/7/23 1353
B-Value (% saturation) post to test: 0.99 6/9/23 1005
* Per ASTM D5084 percent saturation is ensured (B-Value ≥ 95%) prior to testing, as post test saturation values may be exaggerated during depressurizing and sample removal.
**Percent Deformation: based on initial sample length and post permeation sample length.
Laboratory analysis by:D. O'Dowd
Data entered by:D. O'Dowd
Checked by:J. Hines
Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity
Flexible Wall Falling Head-Rising Tail Method
Remolded or Initial
Sample Properties
Post Permeation
Sample Properties Test and Sample Conditions
O P Q
Annulus Pipette
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
In situ sample, extruded
Remolded Sample
Assumed Measured
In situ sample, extruded
Remolded Sample
23
Job Name:Eng. Analytics (4-23)
Job Number:DB23.1131.00
Sample Number:EA-TP8 (95%)
Project:NA
Job Number:NA
Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity
Flexible Wall Falling Head-Rising Tail Method
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
Date Time
Temp
(°C)
Influent
Pipette
Reading
Effluent
Pipette
Reading
Gradient
(ΔH/ΔL)
Average
Flow (cm3)
Elapsed
Time (s)
Ratio
(outflow to
inflow)
Change in
Head (Not to
exceed 25%)
ksat T°C
(cm/s)
ksat Corrected
(cm/s)
Test # 1:
08-Jun-23 09:34:14 21.0 4.20 21.80 2.66
08-Jun-23 10:32:14 21.0 4.55 21.45 2.56
Test # 2:
08-Jun-23 10:32:14 21.0 4.55 21.45 2.56
08-Jun-23 11:30:59 21.0 4.85 21.15 2.47
Test # 3:
09-Jun-23 06:38:30 21.0 4.85 21.15 2.47
09-Jun-23 07:50:10 21.0 5.20 20.80 2.36
Test # 4:
09-Jun-23 07:50:10 21.0 5.20 20.80 2.36
09-Jun-23 08:55:13 20.9 5.50 20.50 2.27
Average Ksat (cm/sec):1.16E-06
Calculated Gravel Corrected Average Ksat (cm/sec):NA
ASTM Required Range (+/- 25%)
Ksat (-25%) (cm/s):8.70E-07
Ksat (+25%) (cm/s):1.45E-06
0.30 3480 1.00 4% 1.31E-06 1.28E-06
0.26 3525 1.00 4% 1.15E-06 1.13E-06
0.30 4300 1.00 4% 1.15E-06 1.12E-06
0.26 3903 1.00 4% 1.13E-06 1.11E-06
8.0E-07
9.0E-07
1.0E-06
1.1E-06
1.2E-06
1.3E-06
1.4E-06
1.5E-06
1000 3000 5000 7000 9000 11000 13000 15000 17000
Ks
a
t

(
c
m
/
s
)
Time (s)
24
Moisture Retention Characteristics
25
Moisture Retention Data
Hanging Column / Pressure Plate
(Soil-Water Characteristic Curve)
Job Name:Engineering Analytics, Inc.Dry wt. of sample (g):311.13
Job Number:DB23.1131.00 Tare wt., ring (g):137.38
Sample Number:EA-TP3 (95%)Tare wt., screen & clamp (g):24.18
Project Number:110444 Initial sample volume (cm3):219.82
Project Name:Shootering Closure Design Initial dry bulk density (g/cm3):1.42
Assumed particle density (g/cm3):2.70
Initial calculated total porosity (%):47.58
Matric Moisture
Weight*Potential Content †
Date Time (g)(-cm water)(% vol)
Hanging column:3-May-23 8:00 586.40 0 49.47 ‡‡
10-May-23 17:00 586.63 64.3 48.61 ‡‡
17-May-23 16:40 583.58 148.8 47.31 ‡‡
Pressure plate:27-May-23 8:00 583.35 337 47.31 ‡‡
12-Jun-23 14:40 582.40 1530 46.90 ‡‡
Volume Adjusted Data 1
Adjusted
Matric Adjusted % Volume Adjusted Calculated
Potential Volume Change 2 Density Porosity
(-cm water)(cm3)(%)(g/cm3)(%)
Hanging column:0.0 229.86 +4.56%1.35 49.87
64.3 234.39 +6.63%1.33 50.84
148.8 234.39 +6.63%1.33 50.84
Pressure plate:337 233.93 +6.42%1.33 50.74
1530 233.93 +6.42%1.33 50.74
Comments:
1
2
*Weight including tares
†Assumed density of water is 1.0 g/cm3
‡‡
Technician Notes:
Laboratory analysis by:D. O'Dowd
Data entered by:J. Hines
Checked by:J. Hines
Represents percent volume change from original sample volume. A '+' denotes measured sample swelling, a '-' denotes measured sample
settling, and '---' denotes no volume change occurred.
Applicable if the sample experienced volume changes during testing. ‘Volume Adjusted’ values represent each of the volume change
measurements obtained after saturated hydraulic conductivity testing and throughout hanging column/pressure plate testing. "---" indicates
no volume changes occurred.
Volume adjustments are applicable at this matric potential (see comment #1). Changes in volume, if applicable, are estimated based on
obtainable measurements of changes in sample length and diameter.
26
Moisture Retention Data
Dew Point Potentiometer / Relative Humidity Box
(Soil-Water Characteristic Curve)
Sample Number:EA-TP3 (95%)
Initial sample bulk density (g/cm3):1.42
Fraction of bulk sample used (<2.00mm fraction) (%):99.80
Dry weight* of dew point potentiometer sample (g):184.03
Tare weight, jar (g):117.01
Weight*Water Potential Moisture Content †
Date Time (g)(-cm water)(% vol)
Dew point potentiometer:13-Jun-23 16:40 200.05 14685 31.72 ‡‡
12-Jun-23 11:59 196.15 54457 24.01 ‡‡
8-Jun-23 16:50 193.08 174590 17.92 ‡‡
8-Jun-23 9:42 190.79 533151 13.39 ‡‡
Volume Adjusted Data 1
Water Adjusted % Volume Adjusted Adjusted
Potential Volume Change 2 Density Calc. Porosity
(-cm water)(cm3)(%)(g/cm3)(%)
Dew point potentiometer:14685 233.93 +6.42%1.33 50.74
54457 233.93 +6.42%1.33 50.74
174590 233.93 +6.42%1.33 50.74
533151 233.93 +6.42%1.33 50.74
Comments:
1
2
*Weight including tares
†
‡‡Volume adjustments are applicable at this matric potential (see comment #1).
Laboratory analysis by:L. Thurgood
Data entered by:J. Hines
Checked by:J. Hines
Applicable if the sample experienced volume changes during testing. ‘Volume Adjusted’ values represent the volume change measurements
obtained after the last hanging column or pressure plate point. "---" indicates no volume changes occurred.
Represents percent volume change from original sample volume. A '+' denotes measured sample swelling, a '-' denotes measured sample
settling, and '---' denotes no volume change occurred.
Adjusted for >2.00mm (#10 sieve) material not used in DPP/RH testing. Assumed moisture content of material >2.00mm is zero, and
assumed density of water is 1.0 g/cm3.
27
Moisture Retention Data
Dew Point Potentiometer / Relative Humidity Box
(Soil-Water Characteristic Curve)
Sample Number:EA-TP3 (95%)
Initial sample bulk density (g/cm3):1.42
Fraction of bulk sample used (<2.00mm fraction) (%):99.80
Dry weight* of relative humidity box sample (g):79.82
Tare weight (g):49.81
Weight*Water Potential Moisture Content †
Date Time (g)(-cm water)(% vol)
Relative humidity box:13-Jun-23 17:15 82.43 852439 11.53 ‡‡
Volume Adjusted Data 1
Water Adjusted % Volume Adjusted Adjusted
Potential Volume Change 2 Density Calc. Porosity
(-cm water)(cm3)(%)(g/cm3)(%)
Relative humidity box:852439 233.93 +6.42%1.33 50.74
Comments:
1
2
*Weight including tares
†
‡‡
Laboratory analysis by:L. Thurgood
Data entered by:J. Hines
Checked by:J. Hines
Volume adjustments are applicable at this matric potential (see comment #1). Changes in volume, if applicable, are estimated based on
obtainable measurements of changes in sample length and diameter.
Applicable if the sample experienced volume changes during testing. ‘Volume Adjusted’ values represent the volume change measurements
obtained after the last hanging column or pressure plate point. "---" indicates no volume changes occurred.
Represents percent volume change from original sample volume. A '+' denotes measured sample swelling, a '-' denotes measured sample
settling, and '---' denotes no volume change occurred.
Adjusted for >2.00mm (#10 sieve) material not used in DPP/RH testing. Assumed moisture content of material >2.00mm is zero, and
assumed density of water is 1.0 g/cm3.
28
Water Retention Data Points
Sample Number: EA-TP3 (95%)
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+06
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Pr
e
s
s
u
r
e

H
e
a
d

(
-cm

w
a
t
e
r
)
Moisture Content (%,cm3/cm3)
Hanging column
Pressure plate
Dew point potentiometer
Rh box
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
29
Predicted Water Retention Curve and Data Points
Sample Number: EA-TP3 (95%)
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+06
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Pr
e
s
s
u
r
e

H
e
a
d

(
-cm

w
a
t
e
r
)
Moisture Content (%,cm3/cm3)
Hanging column
Pressure plate
Dew point potentiometer
Rh box
Predicted curve
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
30
Plot of Relative Hydraulic Conductivity vs Moisture Content
Sample Number: EA-TP3 (95%)
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Re
l
a
t
i
v
e

H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
Moisture Content (%,cm3/cm3)
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
31
Plot of Hydraulic Conductivity vs Moisture Content
Sample Number: EA-TP3 (95%)
1.E-12
1.E-11
1.E-10
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Hy
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y

(
c
m
/
s
)
Moisture Content (%,cm3/cm3)
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
32
Plot of Relative Hydraulic Conductivity vs Pressure Head
Sample Number: EA-TP3 (95%)
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 1.E+01 1.E+02 1.E+03 1.E+04 1.E+05 1.E+06
Re
l
a
t
i
v
e

H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
Pressure Head (-cm water)
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
33
Plot of Hydraulic Conductivity vs Pressure Head
Sample Number: EA-TP3 (95%)
1.E-12
1.E-11
1.E-10
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 1.E+01 1.E+02 1.E+03 1.E+04 1.E+05 1.E+06
Hy
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y

(
c
m
/
s
)
Pressure Head (-cm water)
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
34
Moisture Retention Data
Hanging Column / Pressure Plate
(Soil-Water Characteristic Curve)
Job Name:Engineering Analytics, Inc.Dry wt. of sample (g):384.85
Job Number:DB23.1131.00 Tare wt., ring (g):138.07
Sample Number:EA-TP4 (95%)Tare wt., screen & clamp (g):25.98
Project Number:110444 Initial sample volume (cm3):222.33
Project Name:Shootering Closure Design Initial dry bulk density (g/cm3):1.73
Assumed particle density (g/cm3):2.70
Initial calculated total porosity (%):35.89
Matric Moisture
Weight*Potential Content †
Date Time (g)(-cm water)(% vol)
Hanging column:3-May-23 8:10 629.30 0 36.16
10-May-23 16:30 629.49 24.3 36.25
17-May-23 17:00 625.31 74.8 34.37
25-May-23 7:40 619.46 152.0 31.74
Pressure plate:5-Jun-23 8:00 615.85 337 30.11
Volume Adjusted Data 1
Adjusted
Matric Adjusted % Volume Adjusted Calculated
Potential Volume Change 2 Density Porosity
(-cm water)(cm3)(%)(g/cm3)(%)
Hanging column:0.0 ------------
24.3 ------------
74.8 ------------
152.0 ------------
Pressure plate:337 ------------
Comments:
1
2
*Weight including tares
†Assumed density of water is 1.0 g/cm3
‡‡
Technician Notes:
Laboratory analysis by:D. O'Dowd
Data entered by:J. Hines
Checked by:J. Hines
Represents percent volume change from original sample volume. A '+' denotes measured sample swelling, a '-' denotes measured sample
settling, and '---' denotes no volume change occurred.
Applicable if the sample experienced volume changes during testing. ‘Volume Adjusted’ values represent each of the volume change
measurements obtained after saturated hydraulic conductivity testing and throughout hanging column/pressure plate testing. "---" indicates
no volume changes occurred.
Volume adjustments are applicable at this matric potential (see comment #1). Changes in volume, if applicable, are estimated based on
obtainable measurements of changes in sample length and diameter.
35
Moisture Retention Data
Dew Point Potentiometer / Relative Humidity Box
(Soil-Water Characteristic Curve)
Sample Number:EA-TP4 (95%)
Initial sample bulk density (g/cm3):1.73
Fraction of bulk sample used (<2.00mm fraction) (%):90.89
Dry weight* of dew point potentiometer sample (g):163.94
Tare weight, jar (g):114.65
Weight*Water Potential Moisture Content †
Date Time (g)(-cm water)(% vol)
Dew point potentiometer:13-Jun-23 11:20 168.86 26719 15.70
12-Jun-23 11:50 167.81 85969 12.36
8-Jun-23 16:45 167.10 193150 10.07
8-Jun-23 9:55 166.44 472065 7.99
Volume Adjusted Data 1
Water Adjusted % Volume Adjusted Adjusted
Potential Volume Change 2 Density Calc. Porosity
(-cm water)(cm3)(%)(g/cm3)(%)
Dew point potentiometer:26719 ------------
85969 ------------
193150 ------------
472065 ------------
Comments:
1
2
*Weight including tares
†
‡‡Volume adjustments are applicable at this matric potential (see comment #1).
Laboratory analysis by:L. Thurgood
Data entered by:J. Hines
Checked by:J. Hines
Applicable if the sample experienced volume changes during testing. ‘Volume Adjusted’ values represent the volume change measurements
obtained after the last hanging column or pressure plate point. "---" indicates no volume changes occurred.
Represents percent volume change from original sample volume. A '+' denotes measured sample swelling, a '-' denotes measured sample
settling, and '---' denotes no volume change occurred.
Adjusted for >2.00mm (#10 sieve) material not used in DPP/RH testing. Assumed moisture content of material >2.00mm is zero, and
assumed density of water is 1.0 g/cm3.
36
Moisture Retention Data
Dew Point Potentiometer / Relative Humidity Box
(Soil-Water Characteristic Curve)
Sample Number:EA-TP4 (95%)
Initial sample bulk density (g/cm3):1.73
Fraction of bulk sample used (<2.00mm fraction) (%):90.89
Dry weight* of relative humidity box sample (g):80.68
Tare weight (g):42.47
Weight*Water Potential Moisture Content †
Date Time (g)(-cm water)(% vol)
Relative humidity box:13-Jun-23 17:15 82.24 852439 6.42
Volume Adjusted Data 1
Water Adjusted % Volume Adjusted Adjusted
Potential Volume Change 2 Density Calc. Porosity
(-cm water)(cm3)(%)(g/cm3)(%)
Relative humidity box:852439 ------------
Comments:
1
2
*Weight including tares
†
‡‡
Laboratory analysis by:L. Thurgood
Data entered by:J. Hines
Checked by:J. Hines
Volume adjustments are applicable at this matric potential (see comment #1). Changes in volume, if applicable, are estimated based on
obtainable measurements of changes in sample length and diameter.
Applicable if the sample experienced volume changes during testing. ‘Volume Adjusted’ values represent the volume change measurements
obtained after the last hanging column or pressure plate point. "---" indicates no volume changes occurred.
Represents percent volume change from original sample volume. A '+' denotes measured sample swelling, a '-' denotes measured sample
settling, and '---' denotes no volume change occurred.
Adjusted for >2.00mm (#10 sieve) material not used in DPP/RH testing. Assumed moisture content of material >2.00mm is zero, and
assumed density of water is 1.0 g/cm3.
37
Water Retention Data Points
Sample Number: EA-TP4 (95%)
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+06
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Pr
e
s
s
u
r
e

H
e
a
d

(
-cm

w
a
t
e
r
)
Moisture Content (%,cm3/cm3)
Hanging column
Pressure plate
Dew point potentiometer
Rh box
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
38
Predicted Water Retention Curve and Data Points
Sample Number: EA-TP4 (95%)
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+06
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Pr
e
s
s
u
r
e

H
e
a
d

(
-cm

w
a
t
e
r
)
Moisture Content (%,cm3/cm3)
Hanging column
Pressure plate
Dew point potentiometer
Rh box
Predicted curve
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
39
Plot of Relative Hydraulic Conductivity vs Moisture Content
Sample Number: EA-TP4 (95%)
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Re
l
a
t
i
v
e

H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
Moisture Content (%,cm3/cm3)
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
40
Plot of Hydraulic Conductivity vs Moisture Content
Sample Number: EA-TP4 (95%)
1.E-12
1.E-11
1.E-10
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Hy
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y

(
c
m
/
s
)
Moisture Content (%,cm3/cm3)
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
41
Plot of Relative Hydraulic Conductivity vs Pressure Head
Sample Number: EA-TP4 (95%)
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 1.E+01 1.E+02 1.E+03 1.E+04 1.E+05 1.E+06
Re
l
a
t
i
v
e

H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
Pressure Head (-cm water)
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
42
Plot of Hydraulic Conductivity vs Pressure Head
Sample Number: EA-TP4 (95%)
1.E-12
1.E-11
1.E-10
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 1.E+01 1.E+02 1.E+03 1.E+04 1.E+05 1.E+06
Hy
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y

(
c
m
/
s
)
Pressure Head (-cm water)
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
43
Moisture Retention Data
Hanging Column / Pressure Plate
(Soil-Water Characteristic Curve)
Job Name:Engineering Analytics, Inc.Dry wt. of sample (g):285.85
Job Number:DB23.1131.00 Tare wt., ring (g):137.91
Sample Number:EA-TP6 (95%)Tare wt., screen & clamp (g):26.53
Project Number:110444 Initial sample volume (cm3):221.73
Project Name:Shootering Closure Design Initial dry bulk density (g/cm3):1.29
Assumed particle density (g/cm3):2.75
Initial calculated total porosity (%):53.12
Matric Moisture
Weight*Potential Content †
Date Time (g)(-cm water)(% vol)
Hanging column:3-May-23 8:15 577.27 0 55.25 ‡‡
10-May-23 17:00 583.83 64.3 56.08 ‡‡
17-May-23 16:40 583.60 148.8 55.98 ‡‡
Pressure plate:27-May-23 8:00 583.17 337 55.80 ‡‡
12-Jun-23 14:40 582.70 1530 55.60 ‡‡
Volume Adjusted Data 1
Adjusted
Matric Adjusted % Volume Adjusted Calculated
Potential Volume Change 2 Density Porosity
(-cm water)(cm3)(%)(g/cm3)(%)
Hanging column:0.0 229.84 +3.66%1.24 54.78
64.3 238.13 +7.40%1.20 56.35
148.8 238.13 +7.40%1.20 56.35
Pressure plate:337 238.13 +7.40%1.20 56.35
1530 238.13 +7.40%1.20 56.35
Comments:
1
2
*Weight including tares
†Assumed density of water is 1.0 g/cm3
‡‡
Technician Notes:
Laboratory analysis by:D. O'Dowd
Data entered by:J. Hines
Checked by:J. Hines
Represents percent volume change from original sample volume. A '+' denotes measured sample swelling, a '-' denotes measured sample
settling, and '---' denotes no volume change occurred.
Applicable if the sample experienced volume changes during testing. ‘Volume Adjusted’ values represent each of the volume change
measurements obtained after saturated hydraulic conductivity testing and throughout hanging column/pressure plate testing. "---" indicates
no volume changes occurred.
Volume adjustments are applicable at this matric potential (see comment #1). Changes in volume, if applicable, are estimated based on
obtainable measurements of changes in sample length and diameter.
44
Moisture Retention Data
Dew Point Potentiometer / Relative Humidity Box
(Soil-Water Characteristic Curve)
Sample Number:EA-TP6 (95%)
Initial sample bulk density (g/cm3):1.29
Fraction of bulk sample used (<2.00mm fraction) (%):100.00
Dry weight* of dew point potentiometer sample (g):171.68
Tare weight, jar (g):116.54
Weight*Water Potential Moisture Content †
Date Time (g)(-cm water)(% vol)
Dew point potentiometer:13-Jun-23 16:50 187.02 15297 33.39 ‡‡
12-Jun-23 11:45 182.59 47625 23.74 ‡‡
8-Jun-23 16:45 179.65 195904 17.36 ‡‡
7-Jun-23 15:40 178.07 592708 13.90 ‡‡
Volume Adjusted Data 1
Water Adjusted % Volume Adjusted Adjusted
Potential Volume Change 2 Density Calc. Porosity
(-cm water)(cm3)(%)(g/cm3)(%)
Dew point potentiometer:15297 238.13 +7.40%1.20 56.35
47625 238.13 +7.40%1.20 56.35
195904 238.13 +7.40%1.20 56.35
592708 238.13 +7.40%1.20 56.35
Comments:
1
2
*Weight including tares
†
‡‡Volume adjustments are applicable at this matric potential (see comment #1).
Laboratory analysis by:L. Thurgood
Data entered by:J. Hines
Checked by:J. Hines
Applicable if the sample experienced volume changes during testing. ‘Volume Adjusted’ values represent the volume change measurements
obtained after the last hanging column or pressure plate point. "---" indicates no volume changes occurred.
Represents percent volume change from original sample volume. A '+' denotes measured sample swelling, a '-' denotes measured sample
settling, and '---' denotes no volume change occurred.
Adjusted for >2.00mm (#10 sieve) material not used in DPP/RH testing. Assumed moisture content of material >2.00mm is zero, and
assumed density of water is 1.0 g/cm3.
45
Moisture Retention Data
Dew Point Potentiometer / Relative Humidity Box
(Soil-Water Characteristic Curve)
Sample Number:EA-TP6 (95%)
Initial sample bulk density (g/cm3):1.29
Fraction of bulk sample used (<2.00mm fraction) (%):100.00
Dry weight* of relative humidity box sample (g):86.61
Tare weight (g):44.09
Weight*Water Potential Moisture Content †
Date Time (g)(-cm water)(% vol)
Relative humidity box:13-Jun-23 17:15 91.13 852439 12.76 ‡‡
Volume Adjusted Data 1
Water Adjusted % Volume Adjusted Adjusted
Potential Volume Change 2 Density Calc. Porosity
(-cm water)(cm3)(%)(g/cm3)(%)
Relative humidity box:852439 238.13 +7.40%1.20 56.35
Comments:
1
2
*Weight including tares
†
‡‡
Laboratory analysis by:L. Thurgood
Data entered by:J. Hines
Checked by:J. Hines
Volume adjustments are applicable at this matric potential (see comment #1). Changes in volume, if applicable, are estimated based on
obtainable measurements of changes in sample length and diameter.
Applicable if the sample experienced volume changes during testing. ‘Volume Adjusted’ values represent the volume change measurements
obtained after the last hanging column or pressure plate point. "---" indicates no volume changes occurred.
Represents percent volume change from original sample volume. A '+' denotes measured sample swelling, a '-' denotes measured sample
settling, and '---' denotes no volume change occurred.
Adjusted for >2.00mm (#10 sieve) material not used in DPP/RH testing. Assumed moisture content of material >2.00mm is zero, and
assumed density of water is 1.0 g/cm3.
46
Water Retention Data Points
Sample Number: EA-TP6 (95%)
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+06
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Pr
e
s
s
u
r
e

H
e
a
d

(
-cm

w
a
t
e
r
)
Moisture Content (%,cm3/cm3)
Hanging column
Pressure plate
Dew point potentiometer
Rh box
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
47
Predicted Water Retention Curve and Data Points
Sample Number: EA-TP6 (95%)
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+06
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Pr
e
s
s
u
r
e

H
e
a
d

(
-cm

w
a
t
e
r
)
Moisture Content (%,cm3/cm3)
Hanging column
Pressure plate
Dew point potentiometer
Rh box
Predicted curve
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
48
Plot of Relative Hydraulic Conductivity vs Moisture Content
Sample Number: EA-TP6 (95%)
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Re
l
a
t
i
v
e

H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
Moisture Content (%,cm3/cm3)
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
49
Plot of Hydraulic Conductivity vs Moisture Content
Sample Number: EA-TP6 (95%)
1.E-12
1.E-11
1.E-10
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Hy
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y

(
c
m
/
s
)
Moisture Content (%,cm3/cm3)
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
50
Plot of Relative Hydraulic Conductivity vs Pressure Head
Sample Number: EA-TP6 (95%)
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 1.E+01 1.E+02 1.E+03 1.E+04 1.E+05 1.E+06
Re
l
a
t
i
v
e

H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
Pressure Head (-cm water)
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
51
Plot of Hydraulic Conductivity vs Pressure Head
Sample Number: EA-TP6 (95%)
1.E-12
1.E-11
1.E-10
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 1.E+01 1.E+02 1.E+03 1.E+04 1.E+05 1.E+06
Hy
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y

(
c
m
/
s
)
Pressure Head (-cm water)
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
52
Moisture Retention Data
Hanging Column / Pressure Plate
(Soil-Water Characteristic Curve)
Job Name:Engineering Analytics, Inc.Dry wt. of sample (g):318.47
Job Number:DB23.1131.00 Tare wt., ring (g):136.69
Sample Number:EA-TP8 (95%)Tare wt., screen & clamp (g):28.18
Project Number:110444 Initial sample volume (cm3):220.50
Project Name:Shootering Closure Design Initial dry bulk density (g/cm3):1.44
Assumed particle density (g/cm3):2.75
Initial calculated total porosity (%):47.48
Matric Moisture
Weight*Potential Content †
Date Time (g)(-cm water)(% vol)
Hanging column:3-May-23 8:30 591.21 0 47.83 ‡‡
10-May-23 15:00 594.63 17.8 48.47 ‡‡
17-May-23 17:30 593.95 52.8 48.21 ‡‡
25-May-23 7:45 585.28 128.0 44.56 ‡‡
Pressure plate:5-Jun-23 8:55 579.89 337 42.39 ‡‡
Volume Adjusted Data 1
Adjusted
Matric Adjusted % Volume Adjusted Calculated
Potential Volume Change 2 Density Porosity
(-cm water)(cm3)(%)(g/cm3)(%)
Hanging column:0.0 225.55 +2.29%1.41 48.66
17.8 229.60 +4.13%1.39 49.56
52.8 229.43 +4.05%1.39 49.52
128.0 228.79 +3.76%1.39 49.38
Pressure plate:337 227.77 +3.29%1.40 49.16
Comments:
1
2
*Weight including tares
†Assumed density of water is 1.0 g/cm3
‡‡
Technician Notes:
Laboratory analysis by:D. O'Dowd
Data entered by:J. Hines
Checked by:J. Hines
Represents percent volume change from original sample volume. A '+' denotes measured sample swelling, a '-' denotes measured sample
settling, and '---' denotes no volume change occurred.
Applicable if the sample experienced volume changes during testing. ‘Volume Adjusted’ values represent each of the volume change
measurements obtained after saturated hydraulic conductivity testing and throughout hanging column/pressure plate testing. "---" indicates
no volume changes occurred.
Volume adjustments are applicable at this matric potential (see comment #1). Changes in volume, if applicable, are estimated based on
obtainable measurements of changes in sample length and diameter.
53
Moisture Retention Data
Dew Point Potentiometer / Relative Humidity Box
(Soil-Water Characteristic Curve)
Sample Number:EA-TP8 (95%)
Initial sample bulk density (g/cm3):1.44
Fraction of bulk sample used (<2.00mm fraction) (%):88.99
Dry weight* of dew point potentiometer sample (g):165.59
Tare weight, jar (g):112.24
Weight*Water Potential Moisture Content †
Date Time (g)(-cm water)(% vol)
Dew point potentiometer:9-Jun-23 11:30 172.98 100348 17.24 ‡‡
8-Jun-23 16:40 172.26 174692 15.56 ‡‡
8-Jun-23 9:47 171.16 452893 12.99 ‡‡
7-Jun-23 15:20 170.51 662870 11.48 ‡‡
Volume Adjusted Data 1
Water Adjusted % Volume Adjusted Adjusted
Potential Volume Change 2 Density Calc. Porosity
(-cm water)(cm3)(%)(g/cm3)(%)
Dew point potentiometer:100348 227.77 +3.29%1.40 49.16
174692 227.77 +3.29%1.40 49.16
452893 227.77 +3.29%1.40 49.16
662870 227.77 +3.29%1.40 49.16
Comments:
1
2
*Weight including tares
†
‡‡Volume adjustments are applicable at this matric potential (see comment #1).
Laboratory analysis by:L. Thurgood
Data entered by:J. Hines
Checked by:J. Hines
Applicable if the sample experienced volume changes during testing. ‘Volume Adjusted’ values represent the volume change measurements
obtained after the last hanging column or pressure plate point. "---" indicates no volume changes occurred.
Represents percent volume change from original sample volume. A '+' denotes measured sample swelling, a '-' denotes measured sample
settling, and '---' denotes no volume change occurred.
Adjusted for >2.00mm (#10 sieve) material not used in DPP/RH testing. Assumed moisture content of material >2.00mm is zero, and
assumed density of water is 1.0 g/cm3.
54
Moisture Retention Data
Dew Point Potentiometer / Relative Humidity Box
(Soil-Water Characteristic Curve)
Sample Number:EA-TP8 (95%)
Initial sample bulk density (g/cm3):1.44
Fraction of bulk sample used (<2.00mm fraction) (%):88.99
Dry weight* of relative humidity box sample (g):98.94
Tare weight (g):45.04
Weight*Water Potential Moisture Content †
Date Time (g)(-cm water)(% vol)
Relative humidity box:13-Jun-23 17:15 103.62 852439 10.80 ‡‡
Volume Adjusted Data 1
Water Adjusted % Volume Adjusted Adjusted
Potential Volume Change 2 Density Calc. Porosity
(-cm water)(cm3)(%)(g/cm3)(%)
Relative humidity box:852439 227.77 +3.29%1.40 49.16
Comments:
1
2
*Weight including tares
†
‡‡
Laboratory analysis by:L. Thurgood
Data entered by:J. Hines
Checked by:J. Hines
Volume adjustments are applicable at this matric potential (see comment #1). Changes in volume, if applicable, are estimated based on
obtainable measurements of changes in sample length and diameter.
Applicable if the sample experienced volume changes during testing. ‘Volume Adjusted’ values represent the volume change measurements
obtained after the last hanging column or pressure plate point. "---" indicates no volume changes occurred.
Represents percent volume change from original sample volume. A '+' denotes measured sample swelling, a '-' denotes measured sample
settling, and '---' denotes no volume change occurred.
Adjusted for >2.00mm (#10 sieve) material not used in DPP/RH testing. Assumed moisture content of material >2.00mm is zero, and
assumed density of water is 1.0 g/cm3.
55
Water Retention Data Points
Sample Number: EA-TP8 (95%)
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+06
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Pr
e
s
s
u
r
e

H
e
a
d

(
-cm

w
a
t
e
r
)
Moisture Content (%,cm3/cm3)
Hanging column
Pressure plate
Dew point potentiometer
Rh box
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
56
Predicted Water Retention Curve and Data Points
Sample Number: EA-TP8 (95%)
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+06
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Pr
e
s
s
u
r
e

H
e
a
d

(
-cm

w
a
t
e
r
)
Moisture Content (%,cm3/cm3)
Hanging column
Pressure plate
Dew point potentiometer
Rh box
Predicted curve
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
57
Plot of Relative Hydraulic Conductivity vs Moisture Content
Sample Number: EA-TP8 (95%)
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Re
l
a
t
i
v
e

H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
Moisture Content (%,cm3/cm3)
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
58
Plot of Hydraulic Conductivity vs Moisture Content
Sample Number: EA-TP8 (95%)
1.E-12
1.E-11
1.E-10
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Hy
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y

(
c
m
/
s
)
Moisture Content (%,cm3/cm3)
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
59
Plot of Relative Hydraulic Conductivity vs Pressure Head
Sample Number: EA-TP8 (95%)
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 1.E+01 1.E+02 1.E+03 1.E+04 1.E+05 1.E+06
Re
l
a
t
i
v
e

H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
Pressure Head (-cm water)
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
60
Plot of Hydraulic Conductivity vs Pressure Head
Sample Number: EA-TP8 (95%)
1.E-12
1.E-11
1.E-10
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 1.E+01 1.E+02 1.E+03 1.E+04 1.E+05 1.E+06
Hy
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y

(
c
m
/
s
)
Pressure Head (-cm water)
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
61
Laboratory Tests and Methods
62
Dry Bulk Density:ASTM D7263
Moisture Content:ASTM D7263, ASTM D2216
Calculated Porosity:ASTM D7263
Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity:
Falling Head Rising Tail:
(Flexible Wall)
ASTM D5084
Hanging Column Method: ASTM D6836 (modified apparatus)
Pressure Plate Method: ASTM D6836
Water Potential (Dewpoint
Potentiometer) Method:
ASTM D6836
Relative Humidity (Box)
Method:
Campbell, G. and G. Gee. 1986. Water Potential: Miscellaneous Methods. Chp. 25, pp.
631-632, in A. Klute (ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. American Society of
Agronomy, Madison, WI; Karathanasis & Hajek. 1982. Quantitative Evaluation of Water
Adsorption on Soil Clays. SSA Journal 46:1321-1325
Moisture Retention
Characteristics &
Calculated Unsaturated
Hydraulic Conductivity:
ASTM D6836; van Genuchten, M.T. 1980. A closed-form equation for predicting the
hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. SSSAJ 44:892-898; van Genuchten, M.T., F.J.
Leij, and S.R. Yates. 1991. The RETC code for quantifying the hydraulic functions of
unsaturated soils. Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory, Office of Research
and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Ada, Oklahoma.
EPA/600/2091/065. December 1991
Tests and Methods
D a n i e l B . S t e p h e n s & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c .
63
Tested By: AW Checked By: KG
LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT
PL
A
S
T
I
C
I
T
Y

I
N
D
E
X
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
LIQUID LIMIT
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
CL-ML
CL o
r

O
L
CH o
r

O
H
ML or OL MH or OH
Dashed line indicates the approximate
upper limit boundary for natural soils
4
7
SOIL DATA
SYMBOL SOURCE
NATURAL
USCSSAMPLE DEPTH WATER PLASTIC LIQUID PLASTICITY
NO.CONTENT LIMIT LIMIT INDEX
(%)(%)(%)(%)
ENGINEERING ANALYTICS, INC.
Client:
Project:
Project No.:Figure
Anfield Resources, Inc.
Shootering Closure Design
110444
Aeolian Sands 0.9 NP NV NP SM
Particle Size Distribution Report
PE
R
C
E
N
T

F
I
N
E
R
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
GRAIN SIZE - mm.
0.00010.0010.010.1110100
% +3"Coarse
% Gravel
Fine Coarse Medium
% Sand
Fine Silt
% Fines
Clay
0.0 0.0 1.1 0.6 1.8 82.4 14.1
6
i
n
.
3
i
n
.
2
i
n
.
1½ i
n
.
1
i
n
.
¾ i
n
.
½ i
n
.
3/
8

i
n
.
#4 #1
0
#2
0
#3
0
#4
0
#6
0
#1
0
0
#1
4
0
#2
0
0
Test Results (ASTM D6913 & D1140)Material Description Atterberg (ASTM D4318)
Coefficients
Sieve Test (ASTM D6913 & D1140)
Hydrometer Test USCS (ASTM D2487)
Client:
Project:
Project No:Figure
Sieve Size
or
Diam. (mm.)
Finer
(%)
Spec.*
(%)
Out of
Spec.
(%)
Silty Sand NP NV NP
3/4
3/8
#4
#10
#20
#40
#60
#100
#140
#200
100.0
99.4
98.9
98.3
97.6
96.5
89.9
36.8
23.5
14.1
0.2504 0.2305
0.1855 0.17148/14/2023 EH
0.1318 0.0776
SM
8/10/2023
KG
Anfield Resources, Inc.
Shootering Closure Design
110444
PL= LL= PI=
D90=D85=
D60=D50=
D30=D15=
D10=
Cu=Cc=
Test Notes
Test Date:Technician:
Test Notes
Test Date:Technician:
Date Sampled:
Date Received:
Checked By:
Title:
*(no specification provided)
Source of Sample: Aeolian Sands
ENGINEERING ANALYTICS, INC.
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Dr
y

d
e
n
s
i
t
y
,

p
c
f
109
110.5
112
113.5
115
116.5
Water content, %
2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5
10.8%, 114.6 pcf
ZAV SpG
2.60
1 2 3 4 5 6
Curve No.
Test Specification:
TESTING DATA
TEST RESULTS Material Description
Remarks:
Project No.Client:
Project:
Source of Sample: Aeolian Sands Checked by:
ENGINEERING ANALYTICS, INC.Title:
Figure
ASTM D 698-12 Method B Standard
Moist
5.5 lb.
12 in.
Manual
three 25
0.03333 cu. ft.
3/8 in.
0.9 NV NP
2.631
0.6 14.1
SM A-2-4(0)
8/10/2023
8/10/2023
AW
Silty Sand
110444 Anfield Resources, Inc.
KG
Preparation Method
Hammer Wt.
Hammer Drop
Hammer Type:
Layers Blows/Layer
Mold Size
Test Performed on Material
Passing Sieve
NM LL PI
Sp.G. (assumed):
%>3/8 in.%<No.200
USCS AASHTO
Date Sampled
Date Received
Date Tested
Tested By
WM + WS
WM
WW + T #1
WD + T #1
TARE #1
WW + T #2
WD + T #2
TARE #2
MOISTURE
DRY DENSITY
6027.5 6080.0 6133.7 6177.4 6151.8
4254.1 4254.1 4254.1 4254.1 4254.1
1123.7 1227.7 1319.3 1148.7 1154.4
1083.0 1164.5 1238.8 1063.9 1060.1
300.3 301.0 370.0 300.1 375.6
5.2 7.3 9.3 11.1 13.8
111.5 112.5 113.8 114.5 110.3
Maximum dry density = 114.6 pcf
Optimum moisture = 10.8 %
Shootering Closure Design
ENGINEERING ANALYTICS, INC.
TEST DATA 8/17/2023
Location:Aeolian Sands
Description: Silty Sand
Soil Specific Gravity
Oven-dried soil + tare (grams): 100.49
Oven-dried tare (grams): 0.00
Flask+water (grams): 661.51
Flask+water+soil (grams): 723.82
Water temperature (C): 22.3
Specific gravity: 2.631
Natural Moisture
Wet + tare (grams): 1174.00
Dry + tare (grams): 1167.30
Tare (grams): 421.00
Moisture (%):0.9
Mold #1
L 12.0142 cm 4.730 in
A 28.46125239 cm^2 2.370 in
a 1/9 cm^2 3/8 in
0.00000 ft.0 in
Cell Pressure 93.20 psi
Upper Cap Pressure 86.97 psi
Lower Cap Pressure 89.97 psi
Dry Density 97.4 % Remold @ 85.0 %
% of Moisture 10.8 %Water content ±-0 %
Gradient 3 psi Remold Dry Density 97.4
Consolidation (psi)3.23 psi Remold % of Moisture 10.8 %
Date Time E.T . (s)Reading Lower (cm)Reading Upper (cm)k(cm/s)
17-Aug-23 9:00:00 AM 12.000 43.900
17-Aug-23 9:00:10 AM 10 16.500 39.400 8.8E-05
17-Aug-23 9:00:10 AM 16.500 39.400
17-Aug-23 9:00:20 AM 10 20.300 35.500 7.8E-05
17-Aug-23 9:00:20 AM 20.300 35.500
17-Aug-23 9:00:30 AM 10 23.600 32.100 7.0E-05
17-Aug-23 9:00:30 AM 23.600 32.100
17-Aug-23 9:00:40 AM 10 26.400 29.400 5.9E-05
17-Aug-23 9:00:40 AM 26.400 29.400
17-Aug-23 9:00:50 AM 10 28.600 27.200 4.8E-05
17-Aug-23 9:00:50 AM 28.600 27.200
17-Aug-23 9:01:00 AM 10 30.300 25.500 3.8E-05
17-Aug-23 9:01:00 AM 30.300 25.500
17-Aug-23 9:01:10 AM 10 31.800 24.000 3.4E-05
17-Aug-23 9:01:10 AM 31.800 24.000
17-Aug-23 9:01:20 AM 10 33.300 22.500 3.5E-05
17-Aug-23 9:01:20 AM 33.300 22.500
17-Aug-23 9:01:30 AM 10 34.600 21.200 3.0E-05
17-Aug-23 9:01:30 AM 34.600 21.200
17-Aug-23 9:01:40 AM 10 36.000 19.900 3.2E-05
17-Aug-23 9:01:40 AM 36.000 19.900
17-Aug-23 9:01:50 AM 10 37.400 18.500 3.4E-05
Average k=3.3E-05
Height from top of sample to 0
Proctor Remold @
Flexible Wall Permeability Test
110444 Shootering Rec. Plan
Aeolian Sands
Length of sample
Area of sample
Area of standpipe
1.0E-06
1.0E-05
1.0E-04
1.0E-03
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pe
r
m
e
a
b
i
l
i
t
y

(
k
,

c
m
/
s
)
Time (Hours)
Flexwall Permeability Test
Shootering Rec Plan
Aeolian Sands
Remolded to 85.0% of Proctor @ ± 0% Moisture
Average Permeability k = 3.3E-05cm/s
LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT
ASTM D4318
PL
A
S
T
I
C
I
T
Y

I
N
D
E
X
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
LIQUID LIMIT
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
CL-ML
CL or
O
L
CH or

O
H
ML or OL MH or OH
Dashed line indicates the approximate
upper limit boundary for natural soils
47
Sample Identification Sampled Received Tested Technician
Material Description USCS LL PL PI NM %<#40
PL Rolling Method LL Device Grooving Tool Test Remarks
Depth: 0 8/03/2023 EH
Bulk South @ 0-2'SM NV NP NP 1.0 80.4
Hand rolled Manual Metal
110444 Anfield Resources, Inc.KG
Shootering Closure Design
Project No.Client:Checked by:
Project:Title:
ENGINEERING ANALYTICS, INC.Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
PE
R
C
E
N
T

F
I
N
E
R
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
GRAIN SIZE - mm.
0.00010.0010.010.1110100
% +3"Coarse
% Gravel
Fine Coarse Medium
% Sand
Fine Silt
% Fines
Clay
0.0 0.0 8.0 5.7 5.9 56.2 24.2
6
i
n
.
3
i
n
.
2
i
n
.
1½ i
n
.
1
i
n
.
¾ i
n
.
½ i
n
.
3/
8

i
n
.
#4 #1
0
#2
0
#3
0
#4
0
#6
0
#1
0
0
#1
4
0
#2
0
0
Test Results (ASTM D6913 & D1140)Material Description Atterberg (ASTM D4318)
Coefficients
Sieve Test (ASTM D6913 & D1140)
Hydrometer Test USCS (ASTM D2487)
Client:
Project:
Project No:Figure
Sieve Size
or
Diam. (mm.)
Finer
(%)
Spec.*
(%)
Out of
Spec.
(%)
Bulk South @ 0-2'NP NV NP
1
3/4
3/8
#4
#10
#20
#40
#60
#100
#140
#200
100.0
100.0
96.3
92.0
86.3
82.4
80.4
78.3
59.3
37.1
24.2
3.5513 1.5718
0.1522 0.12948/02/2023 EH
0.0890
SM
Anfield Resources, Inc.
Shootering Closure Design
110444
PL= LL= PI=
D90=D85=
D60=D50=
D30=D15=
D10=
Cu=Cc=
Test Notes
Test Date:Technician:
Test Notes
Test Date:Technician:
Date Sampled:
Date Received:
Checked By:
Title:
*(no specification provided)
Depth: 0
ENGINEERING ANALYTICS, INC.
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Dr
y

d
e
n
s
i
t
y
,

p
c
f
111
113
115
117
119
121
Water content, %
7.5 9 10.5 12 13.5 15 16.5
11.1%, 119.3 pcf
ZAV SpG
2.60
1 2 3 4 5 6
Curve No.
1
Test Specification:
TESTING DATA
TEST RESULTS Material Description
Remarks:
Project No.Client:
Project:
Depth: 0 Checked by:
ENGINEERING ANALYTICS, INC.Title:
Figure
ASTM D 698-12 Method B Standard
5.5 lb.
12 in.
three 25
0.03333 cu. ft.
3/8 in.
NV NP
2.593
3.7 24.2
SM A-2-4(0)
08/1/23
DS
Bulk South @ 0-2'
110444 Anfield Resources, Inc.
EH
Preparation Method
Hammer Wt.
Hammer Drop
Hammer Type:
Layers Blows/Layer
Mold Size
Test Performed on Material
Passing Sieve
NM LL PI
Sp.G. (D854):
%>3/8 in.%<No.200
USCS AASHTO
Date Sampled
Date Received
Date Tested
Tested By
WM + WS
WM
WW + T #1
WD + T #1
TARE #1
WW + T #2
WD + T #2
TARE #2
MOISTURE
DRY DENSITY
6174.1 6258.9 6197.9
4254.3 4254.3 4254.3
1165.1 1273.7 1157.1
1092.0 1175.4 1049.9
293.9 294.8 265.1
9.2 11.2 13.7
116.3 119.3 113.1
Maximum dry density = 119.3 pcf
Optimum moisture = 11.1 %
Shootering Closure Design
ENGINEERING ANALYTICS, INC.
TEST DATA 8/9/2023
Depth:0
Description: Bulk South @ 0-2'
Soil Specific Gravity
Oven-dried soil + tare (grams): 103.90
Oven-dried tare (grams): 0.00
Flask+water (grams): 661.51
Flask+water+soil (grams): 725.37
Water temperature (C): 22.7
Specific gravity: 2.593
Natural Moisture
Wet + tare (grams): 1058.00
Dry + tare (grams): 1050.50
Tare (grams): 290.90
Moisture (%):1.0
Mold #1
L 11.43 cm 4.500 in
A 25.19805623 cm^2 2.230 in
a 1/9 cm^2 3/8 in
0.00000 ft.0 in
Cell Pressure 95.11 psi
Upper Cap Pressure 87.35 psi
Lower Cap Pressure 90.47 psi
Dry Density 100.3 % Remold @ 84.1 %
% of Moisture 11.1 %Water content ±-1 %
Gradient 3 psi Remold Dry Density 100.3
Consolidation (psi)4.64 psi Remold % of Moisture 11.1 %
Date Time E.T . (s)Reading Lower (cm)Reading Upper (cm)k(cm/s)
8-Aug-23 9:00:00 AM 17.000 44.000
8-Aug-23 9:00:10 AM 10 21.100 40.800 7.5E-05
8-Aug-23 9:00:10 AM 21.100 40.800
8-Aug-23 9:00:30 AM 20 28.200 32.700 8.2E-05
8-Aug-23 9:00:30 AM 28.200 32.700
8-Aug-23 9:00:40 AM 10 32.100 28.800 8.9E-05
8-Aug-23 9:00:40 AM 32.100 28.800
8-Aug-23 9:01:00 AM 20 40.000 21.000 9.4E-05
8-Aug-23 9:01:00 AM 13.100 48.100
8-Aug-23 9:01:20 AM 20 21.200 39.900 8.3E-05
8-Aug-23 9:01:20 AM 21.200 39.900
8-Aug-23 9:01:30 AM 10 25.200 36.000 8.5E-05
8-Aug-23 9:01:30 AM 25.200 36.000
8-Aug-23 9:01:40 AM 10 29.100 32.200 8.5E-05
8-Aug-23 9:01:40 AM 29.100 32.200
8-Aug-23 9:01:50 AM 10 33.000 28.400 8.8E-05
8-Aug-23 9:01:50 AM 33.000 28.400
8-Aug-23 9:02:00 AM 10 36.600 24.700 8.7E-05
8-Aug-23 9:02:00 AM 36.600 24.700
8-Aug-23 9:02:10 AM 10 40.100 21.100 8.7E-05
8-Aug-23 9:02:10 AM 40.100 21.100
8-Aug-23 9:02:20 AM 10 43.700 17.600 9.0E-05
Average k=8.8E-05
Height from top of sample to 0
Proctor Remold @
Flexible Wall Permeability Test
110444 Shootering Rec Plan
Bulk South @ 0'-2'
Length of sample
Area of sample
Area of standpipe
1.0E-06
1.0E-05
1.0E-04
1.0E-03
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
Pe
r
m
e
a
b
i
l
i
t
y

(
k
,

c
m
/
s
)
Time (Hours)
Flexwall Permeability Test
Shootering Rec Plan
Bulk South @ 0'-2'
Remolded to 84.1% of Proctor @ ± 0% Moisture
Average Permeability k = 8.8E-05cm/s
ATTACHMENT E2
RADON MODEL OUTPUT
9/19/23, 11:15 AM Uranium Mill Tailings Cover Calculator
www.wise-uranium.org/ctc.html?unit=c 1/2
HOME WISE Uranium Project > Calculators >
Uranium Mill Tailings Cover Calculator
(last updated 21 Mar 2011)
Requires Netscape 3.0, Internet Explorer 3.0 or higher. JavaScript must be enabled.
For educational purposes only. No warranty.
Determine the radon flux through a multi-layer soil cover of an uranium mill tailings pile and/or optimize
the cover for a given flux.
(For calculating radon flux from bare and/or water covered tailings, see the Uranium Mill Tailings Radon Flux Calculator)
Select activity unit first, then enter the parameters and click the "Calculate" button below. HELP
Layer 1 is the tailings layer.
Numbers can be entered in exponential notation: 5 · 10-6 = 5e-6

Activity unit: pCi Bq
Sample Data Input Data
Layer Data HELP
Layer
No.
Thickness
[m]
Ra-226
Activity
Conc.
[pCi/g]
Rn-222
Emanation
Fraction
Porosity

Moisture
Cont.
[dry wt_%]
Fraction
Passing
#200 Mesh
(75 µm) *)
Rn-222 Eff.
Diff.Coeff *)
[m2/s]
1 5 815 .35 .48 17.16
2 .305 0 .35 .41 6
3 .457 0 .35 .36 21.9
4 .417 0 .35 .41 6
5 1.067 0 .35 .37 6
6
7
8
Options HELP
Entrance Radon flux to Layer 1 [pCi/m2s] *)
Surface Radon conc. at top of system [pCi/L] *)
Layer No. to be optimized *)
Surface flux constraint for optimization [pCi/m2s] *)
Surface flux convergence criterion (fraction) *)
9/19/23, 11:15 AM Uranium Mill Tailings Cover Calculator
www.wise-uranium.org/ctc.html?unit=c 2/2
Annual Precipitation [cm] *)
Annual Lake Evaporation [cm] *)
Depth to Water Table [m] *)
*) optional
Calculate Reset Form HELP
Results
2 0.305 0 .35 0.41 6 2.538E-6
3 0.457 0 .35 0.36 20.62 1.555E-9
4 0.417 0 .35 0.41 6 2.538E-6
5 1.067 0 .35 0.37 6 2.189E-6
-------- Results of Radon Diffusion Calculation --------
Layer Thickness Exit Flux Exit Conc. MIC
No. [m] [pCi/m2s] [pCi/L]
1 5 197.5 572.2E3 0.629
2 0.305 4.813 723.8E3 0.827
3 0.457 ***** 525.8E-6 0.267
4 0.417 ***** 344.3E-6 0.827
5 1.067 ***** 0E0 0.796

Total cover radon retention: 100.0%
> See also:
Unit Converter
Uranium Mill Tailings Radon Flux Calculator
Uranium Radiation Properties · Uranium Radiation Exposure
Uranium Decay Calculator
Radon Individual Dose Calculator
Uranium in Soil and Building Material Individual Dose Calculator
Uranium Mine and Mill Resident Individual Dose Calculator
Nuclear Fuel Population Health Risk Calculator (collective dose)

HOME WISE Uranium Project > Calculators >
APPENDIX F
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM – BIOINTRUSION
ASSESSMENT (CEDAR CREEK, 2023)
Technical Memo
PO Box 272150
Fort Collins, CO 80527
Date: September 22, 2023
To: Engineering Analytics, Inc.
From: Cedar Creek Associates, Inc.
Subject: Biointrusion Assessment for the Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Cover
Cedar Creek Associates, Inc. (Cedar Creek) was retained by Engineering Analytics, Inc. (Engineering
Analytics) to conduct an assessment of biointrusion risk, from vegetation and burrowing animals, to
cover performance at the Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility site near Hanksville, Utah. To
complete this assessment, Cedar Creek conducted a literature study of local soils, vegetation, and
wildlife to understand the potential for biointrusion on the Shootaring cover. The findings are
summarized below.
Current Cover Design Overview
The Shootaring cover is designed to have a shallow slope to encourage water shedding off the surface
of the tailing facility. The current cover design includes approximately 96 inches of cover material over
the tailings. The surface layer is 12 inches depth comprised 75% soil and 25% rock (D50 of 2 inches for
the rock) mixed by volume. Below the surface layer is 42 inches of pediment, and 12 inches of sand
over 12 inches of compacted clay. The compacted clay will be underlain by a minimum of 18-inchs of
interim cover material. Engineering Analytics determined that 42 inches of cover material over the clay
layer is sufficient for frost protection. The design parameters of the cover discourage percolation by
including a sand ‘water evacuation layer’ in which excess water will flow down slope and off the cover
without the opportunity to saturate the compacted clay layer below. With the overall goal of keeping the
clay layer intact and ensuring waste isolation, it is necessary to consider the risks of biointrusion by
vegetation or animals into and through the clay layer.
Local Soils
Quantitative agronomic properties of the cover materials have not been characterized since the current
effort is just a preliminary design. However, A general understanding of the soil qualities of cover
material is necessary to inform biointrusion potential. Cedar Creek used the USDA web soil survey to
obtain an overview of soil types and conditions in the vicinity of the project. In general, the soils in the
project vicinity range from fine sandy loam to gravelly and cobbly sandy loams and most of the area
contains bedrock at shallow depths. In general, it appears the area soils exhibit favorable agronomic
characteristics to be appropriate for use as cover materials.
The web soil survey reports an estimated maximum percent of calcium carbonate (CaCO3) for each soil
type, which ranges from 10-50%. Soils with greater than 15% CaCO3 have the potential to form
hardpan caliche layers over time where soluble CaCO3 accumulates in the soil profile. These hardpan
layers would generally form at 30-60cm depth in this area. If borrow soil containing elevated calcium
carbonate is used, the hardpan layer may or may not form uniformly across the cover (depending on the
construction methods for the cover). Where hardpan layers are formed, they would prevent or slow
percolating water. This indicates that caliche layers may provide additional protection against percolation
deeper into the profile.
Vegetation Biointrusion Assessment
Given the design parameters of the cover and the soil characteristics in the vicinity of the project, an
assessment of potential vegetation biointrusion on the cover was implemented. The cover design does
not include planned seeding and revegetation establishment on the cover. However, Cedar Creek
expects some amount of vegetation to volunteer and inhabit the cover over time. Surrounding
vegetation communities were studied to predict which species may volunteer on the cover and to
consider the implications of those species’ potential for root biointrusion. It is expected that shrub
species found in the area will volunteer and these species can have deep rooting profiles which could
serve a biointrusion risk to the clay layer of the cover.
Blackbrush is the dominant local shrub and Saltbush is present. According to Range Plants of Utah (Utah
State University Extension), Blackbrush occurs in dry, well-drained soils, often over a hardpan layer. In
shallow soils, there is an overall low abundance of Blackbrush. The USDA and USFS Fire Effects
Information System (FEIS) documents diffuse and shallow root systems for Blackbrush, with the
greatest root biomass found at a soil depth of 4 to 12 inches (10-30 cm), and if a caliche layer is
present, few roots can penetrate it (USDA). Fourwing Saltbush has a greater documented rooting depth
than Blackbrush, which is listed as 39.37 feet in the Nature Conservancy’s Plant Rooting Depth
Database. The values listed in this database are averaged global rooting depth data for phreatophytes,
or groundwater-dependent vegetation (Canadell 1996).
Cedar Creek has found that groundwater is often very deep in arid environments, causing vegetation to
utilize precipitation as a water source, rather than rooting to extreme depths to reach groundwater.
When looking at shrub profiles throughout the west in strictly upland circumstances, in which the
vegetation is most reliant on meteoric water, root activity is primarily occurring in the top 3 feet of soil.
This was observed by Cedar Creek at a site in New Mexico while conducting root length density studies
in soil pits dug to 6 feet depth. No root diameters greater than 1 mm were found below 30 cm (11.8
inches) in all soil pits and no taproots were found near or at the bottom of any of the soil pits. The
largest taproot was a Fourwing Saltbush taproot located at 20 cm below the soil surface that measured
17.49 mm. The taproot was growing laterally at this depth (picture) as the vegetation at the site was
utilizing precipitation for its water source rather than groundwater.
This will be the case at Shootaring as the
cover design includes a compacted clay
layer and is likely to include caliche hardpan
layers. These restrictive layers may prevent
or restrict vertical root growth and
encourage lateral growth along the hardpan
interfaces. When functioning properly, these
hardpan layers also prevent or slow
percolation through the cover profile causing
water to ‘perch’ on top of them. This
perched water acts as plant available water
to be utilized by present vegetation. Therefore, it is expected that lateral rooting activity will occur by
volunteer vegetation on the cover.
Caliche layers contain concentrated CaCO3, which in this area is expected to be found at somewhat
shallow depths. Along with this, high levels of CaCO3 have negative effects on vegetation and restrict
growth, because it limits the plant available water in the soil profile. This will likely reduce overall
vegetation growth, with the exception of Blackbrush which seems to thrive in shallow soils. Lastly, plant
available water will be located at the interfaces of the hardpan and clay layers, encouraging lateral root
growth. These conditions will exist for Saltbush with similar expected results. Although Saltbush can root
to great depths, it is unlikely to do so on the Shootaring cover. The cover design and ecological aspects
of the potential borrow source material indicate that vegetation will utilize precipitation and exhibit
lateral rooting activity in pursuit of water.
Overall, the risk of vegetation biointrusion on the Shootaring cover is limited (but not zero) as long as
the cover is effectively working.
Animal Biointrusion Assessment
Given the design parameters of the cover, soil characteristics in the vicinity of the project, and expected
vegetation conditions of the cover, an assessment of potential animal biointrusion on the cover was
implemented. Since planned revegetation establishment is not considered for this cover, a functional
ecosystem is not expected to inhabit the cover. In general, animals and insects rely on a functional
ecosystem to serve as suitable habitat, therefore, animal and insect utilization of the cover is expected
to be diminished. Animal and insect presence increases the risk for biointrusion. Cedar Creek found that
several species in the Shootaring vicinity can burrow to great depths and move large amounts of soil.
Tunneling and burrowing by these species can affect soil morphology and may increase percolation rates
and erosion. Burrowing species in this region of Utah include termites, species of ground squirrels,
chipmunks, pocket gophers, kangaroo rats, woodrats, mice, pocket mice, voles, shrews, jackrabbits and
cottontails, badgers, coyotes, and fox. The biggest risk to cover success would come from termites,
ground squirrels, and species that expand the burrows dug by other species such as badgers, coyotes,
and fox.
Subterranean termites may nest to more than 15 feet depth and create many tunnels (Schumm).
Other insects with subterranean habits are unlikely to burrow more than 12 inches into the ground and
rarely burrow more than 6 inches. Termite diets consist of wood and plant material, therefore, if they
inhabit the cover, they aren’t likely to be found below the shallow rooting depths of the potential
volunteer vegetation. The average depth of their tunnels and their relative abundance in the area is
unknown.
Small mammals may inhabit the cover over time as some species eat the seeds of Blackbrush (Utah State
University), however, their presence on the cover would depend on quality vegetation and
habitat establishment. The Shootaring cover does not include planned vegetation reclamation and
shrubs are expected to volunteer, though this may take many years and their abundance may be very
low. Without an abundance of grass and forb species that also act as quality habitat and food
sources for ground squirrels, it is unlikely that they would establish colonies on the cover with little
vegetation. Several species of ground squirrel exist in Southeastern Utah, and the Piute ground
squirrel is documented to create burrows up to 6 feet deep with multiple entrances (Nelson and Frey
2020). The likeliness of ground squirrel establishment on the cover is low, and the hardpan and clay
layers of the cover would likely deter deep burrowing. Piute ground squirrel abundance in the area is
unknown.
Badgers, coyotes, and fox are known to burrow (or to enlarge other animals’ burrows) for denning
purposes. Badgers form many wide burrows and may burrow deep enough to intrude through the clay
layer of the cover. Burrows re-excavated by badgers in pursuit of prey may reach depths of 1.5
meters (4.9 feet) (Anderson and Johns 1977) and exhibit a characteristic oval-shape that is
approximately 10-12 inches in width and 6-8 inches in height. This observation is significant from the
standpoint that badgers,
when excavating their prey, double or triple the amount of excavated material brought to the
surface. However, badger burrowing depends on prey presence and would only go as deep as the prey
burrows. On the positive side, badgers reduce the populations of burrowing rodentia. These species
are likely present in the area, but their inhabitation of the cover would depend on prey establishment on
the cover.
Cedar Creek anticipates that the risk of animal/insect biointrusion is limited (but not zero). Without
vegetation establishment to provide habitat and food sources, insects and animals are unlikely to seek out
the cover to inhabit. The cover will also be surrounded by previously disturbed areas at the Shootaring
site with diminished habitat quality. Course rock material, hardpan layers, and compacted clay layers
included in the cover design reduce the risk of deep burrowing by any of the local species, if present.
References
Anderson, D. C. and D. W. Johns. 1977. “Predation by badger on yellow-bellied marmot in Colorado.
Southwest.” The American Midland Naturalist. 22:283-284.
Canadell, J., Jackson, R.B., Ehleringer, J.B. et al. 1996. “Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale.” Oecologia 108, 583–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00329030 Plant Rooting
Depth Database | Groundwater Resource Hub
Natural History Museum of Utah. “Mammals of the Wasatch Front.” https://nhmu.utah.edu/mammals-
wasatch-front. Accessed 22 Sept. 2023.
Nelson, Mark and Frey, Nicki. “Controlling Piute Ground Squirrels in Southwest Utah.” Utah State
University Extension. February 2020.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiL4-
XNkL2BAxVfMDQIHQRxAAAQFnoECBYQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fextension.usu.edu%2Fpests%2
Fresearch%2Fpiute-ground-squirrels&usg=AOvVaw1vTaAfoCEwL9ksEq4UEw_Q&opi=89978449
Schumm, Zach. “Coming to Terms with Termites.” Utah State University Extension.
https://extension.usu.edu/pests/news/termites
Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Web
Soil Survey. Available online. Accessed 22 Sept. 2023.
Utah State University. “Range Plants of Utah – Blackbrush.”
https://extension.usu.edu/rangeplants/shrubs-and-trees/blackbrush. Accessed 22 Sept. 2023.
APPENDIX G
RESULTS OF SETTLEMENT ANALYSES

Project Name: Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Project No. 110444
Settlement Calcs
Material Properties
Material Type Thickness (in) Thickness (ft) Dry Density (pcf) Bulk Density (pcf) Pressure (psf) Specific Gravity
Initial Water
Content, w (%)Porosity, n
Initial Void
Ratio, e0
Rock Mulch 12 1 101.4 112.7 112.7 2.593 11.1 0.37 0.59
Pediment Layer 42 3.5 101.4 112.7 394.3 2.593 11.1 0.37 0.59
Sand Layer 12 1 97.4 107.9 107.9 2.631 10.8 0.41 0.69
Clay Layer 12 1 107.9 124.2 124.2 2.5 15.1 0.36 0.56
Interim Cover (Sand)18 1.5 97.4 107.9 161.9 2.631 10.8 0.41 0.69
Tailings 704 58.7 81.5 96.8 5680.2 2.5 18.8 0.48 0.92
Applied Cover Stress (psf) 900.9
Initial Void Ratio, e0
Compression
Index, Cc
Compression Ratio,
Ccε
Compression Ratio,
Ccε (%)
0.866 0.12 0.0642 6.42
Consolidation Data of Tailings (Lab data from Tetra Tech, 2008)
Initial Height (in)1
Initial Dry Density (pcf)89.8
Load (psf)Log sigma consolidation (in) deflection (in) void ratio, e
50 1.699 0.0555 -0.0555 0.8585
97 1.987 0.0599 -0.0599 0.8498
196 2.292 0.0784 -0.0784 0.8134
397 2.599 0.1003 -0.1003 0.7703
807 2.907 0.115 -0.115 0.7414
1636 3.214 0.1342 -0.1342 0.7036
3229 3.509 0.1531 -0.1531 0.6664
6468 3.811 0.1694 -0.1694 0.6343
12921 4.111 0.19 -0.19 0.5938
25582 4.408 0.2073 -0.2073 0.5598
6468 3.811 0.2055 -0.2055 0.5633
1630 3.212 0.2028 -0.2028 0.5686
396 2.598 0.2003 -0.2003 0.5735
97 1.987 0.195 -0.195 0.5840
50 1.699 0.1944 -0.1944 0.5851
Project Name: Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Project No. 110444
Settlement Calcs
Time Rate of Consolidation Data (Lab data from Tetra Tech, 2008)
397 psf load 807 psf Load
Elapsed Time (min)
Sqrt Time
(min) Dial Reading (in) Deflection (in) Elapsed Time (min) Sqrt Time (min)
Dial Reading
(in) Deflection (in)
0 0.00 0.0791 0 0 0.00 0.1022 0
0.1 0.32 0.0818 -0.0027 0.1 0.32 0.1053 -0.0031
0.3 0.55 0.0824 -0.0033 0.3 0.55 0.1061 -0.0039
0.5 0.71 0.0831 -0.004 0.5 0.71 0.1067 -0.0045
1 1.00 0.0842 -0.0051 1 1.00 0.1077 -0.0055
2 1.41 0.0856 -0.0065 2 1.41 0.1087 -0.0065
4 2.00 0.0877 -0.0086 4 2.00 0.1097 -0.0075
9 3.00 0.0907 -0.0116 9 3.00 0.111 -0.0088
16 4.00 0.0927 -0.0136 16 4.00 0.1117 -0.0095
30 5.48 0.0948 -0.0157 30 5.48 0.1126 -0.0104
60 7.75 0.0968 -0.0177 60 7.75 0.1135 -0.0113
120 10.95 0.0982 -0.0191 120 10.95 0.1147 -0.0125
295 17.18 0.0997 -0.0206 295 17.18 0.1162 -0.014
480 21.91 0.1007 -0.0216 480 21.91 0.1172 -0.015
1636 psf load 3229 psf load
Elapsed Time (min)
Sqrt Time
(min) Dial Reading (in) Deflection (in) Elapsed Time (min) Sqrt Time (min)
Dial Reading
(in) Deflection (in)
0 0.00 0.1185 0 0 0.00 0.1398 0
0.1 0.32 0.1232 -0.0047 0.1 0.32 0.1455 -0.0057
0.3 0.55 0.1243 -0.0058 0.3 0.55 0.1466 -0.0068
0.5 0.71 0.1254 -0.0069 0.5 0.71 0.1477 -0.0079
1 1.00 0.1267 -0.0082 1 1.00 0.149 -0.0092
2 1.41 0.128 -0.0095 2 1.41 0.1503 -0.0105
4 2.00 0.1294 -0.0109 4 2.00 0.1514 -0.0116
9 3.00 0.1313 -0.0128 9 3.00 0.1526 -0.0128
16 4.00 0.1322 -0.0137 16 4.00 0.1535 -0.0137
30 5.48 0.1335 -0.015 30 5.48 0.1545 -0.0147
60 7.75 0.1348 -0.0163 60 7.75 0.1555 -0.0157
120 10.95 0.136 -0.0175 120 10.95 0.1565 -0.0167
295 17.18 0.137 -0.0185 295 17.18 0.1574 -0.0176
480 21.91 0.138 -0.0195 480 21.91 0.1583 -0.0185
Project Name: Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Project No. 110444
Settlement Calcs
Tailings Secondary Settlement, S s
Initial Sample Height, H0
(in)
Initial Void Ratio,
e0
1 0.9677
Height of Solids, Hs
0.508 in
1.291 cm
Time-Rate Consolidation Lab Results
1636 psf load
Elapsed Time (min)Sqrt Time (min)Dial Reading (in)Deflection (in)e
0 0.00 0.1185 0 0.968
0.1 0.32 0.1232 -0.0047 0.958
0.3 0.55 0.1243 -0.0058 0.956
0.5 0.71 0.1254 -0.0069 0.954
1 1.00 0.1267 -0.0082 0.952
2 1.41 0.128 -0.0095 0.949
4 2.00 0.1294 -0.0109 0.946
9 3.00 0.1313 -0.0128 0.943
16 4.00 0.1322 -0.0137 0.941
30 5.48 0.1335 -0.015 0.938
60 7.75 0.1348 -0.0163 0.936
120 10.95 0.136 -0.0175 0.933
295 17.18 0.137 -0.0185 0.931
480 21.91 0.138 -0.0195 0.929
Secondary Compression Index, C α
0.0036 0.03*(Cc)Per Table 2-5, Section 2-10.7 of Bowles (1996)
Secondary Settlement (Creep)
100 min (Estimated from log t-e chart)
0.0002 yr
198,246,400 min
377.18 yr
1000 yr
525,600,000 min
Secondary Settlement, S s 0.0454 in
0.0038 ft
End of Primary
Consolidation, t p (field)
Design Life, tf
End of Primary
Consolidation, t p (lab)
𝑡௙௜௘௟ௗ
𝑡௟௔௕
=
𝐻௙௜௘௟ௗ
ଶ
𝐻௟௔௕
ଶ
S =𝐶ఈ
ு೚
ଵା௘೚
log ௧೑
௧೛
Project name:Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Project no.: 110444

Post-Closure Settlement Calculations for Cracking Potential Evaluation of the Radon Barrier
Thickness of
Tailings
(ft)
Diff in Post
Grading
thickness of
Tailings (ft)
Thickness of
Interim Cover
(ft)
Radon Barrier
(ft)
Capillary
Break
(ft)
Freeze
Layer
(ft)
Erosion
Protection
(ft)
Increase in
Vertical Stress
(psf)
Increase in
Vertical Strain
(in/in)
Consolidation
Settlement
(inches)
Increase in
Vertical Stress
(psf)
Increase in
Vertical Strain
(in/in)
Consolidation
Settlement
(inches)
(3)(3)(3)(3)(3) (3) (3)(4)(5)(6)(5)
A1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
A2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
A3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
A4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
A5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
A6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
A7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
A.1-8 2.2 0.3 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 170.6 0.0004 1.7 661.6 0.0014 2.7 0.00 4.41 2.85
A9 0.9 0.9 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 219.5 0.0005 1.0 661.6 0.0014 1.4 0.00 2.40 1.46
A10 0.8 0.8 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 211.3 0.0004 0.9 661.6 0.0014 1.2 0.00 2.18 1.34
A11 0.8 0.8 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 211.3 0.0004 0.9 661.6 0.0014 1.2 0.00 2.18 1.34
A12 0.8 0.8 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 211.3 0.0004 0.9 661.6 0.0014 1.2 0.00 2.18 1.34
A.1-13 1.9 0.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 146.1 0.0003 1.5 661.6 0.0014 2.4 0.00 3.90 2.55
A.2-14 0.7 1.2 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 243.9 0.0005 0.9 661.6 0.0014 1.1 0.00 2.00 1.21
A15 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
NOTES:
Compacted
Density
(pcf)
Constrained
Modulus, D
(psf)
(1) Parameters were obtained from testing completed by EA. 81.5*470,000 (2)
(2) Assumed values.107.9 124,000 (2)
(3) Depths are based on the final proposed Tailings facility configuration 97.4 124,000 (2)
(4) [(H*density) regraded tailings] + [(H*density) interim sand layer].101.4
(5) = Increase in vertical stress / constrained modulus.101.4
(6) [(0.5H*density) radon barrier] + [(H*density) capillary break] + [(H*density) freeze layer] + [(H*density) erosion layer].Initial Void Ratio,
e0
Compression
Index, Cc
Compression
Ratio, Ccε
Compression
Ratio, Ccε (%)
Secondary
Compression
Index
Void Ratio,
Secondary
Compression
* Calculated using data obtained from the August 2008 Advanced Terra Testing Report 0.866 0.12 0.0642 6.42 0.0036 0.9677
10% Interim Cover +
Final Cover +
Secondary (Creep)
Settlement
Total
Post-Closure
Settlement
(inches)
Material
Tailings
Radon Barrier (Clay)
Capillary Break (Sand)
Secondary
Settlement
(inches)
Location
No.
Thickness
Freeze Layer (Pediment)
Erosion Protection (Rock Mulch)
Final CoverTailings Regrading and Interim Cover
P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.12 Cover Cracking\Appendix H_Settlement and Cracking Analyses (2ft).xlsx
Project name:Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Project no.: 110444

Post-Closure Settlement Calculations for Cracking Potential Evaluation of the Radon Barrier
Thickness of
Tailinging
Material
(ft)
Diffrence in
Post Grading
thickness of
Tailings
Thickness of
Waste Sand
Fill Under
Cover
(ft)
Radon Barrier
(ft)
Capillary
Break
(ft)
Freeze
Layer
(ft)
Erosion
Protection
(ft)
Increase in
Vertical Stress
(psf)
Increase in
Vertical Strain
(in/in)
Consolidation
Settlement
(inches)
Increase in
Vertical Stress
(psf)
Increase in
Vertical Strain
(in/in)
Consolidation
Settlement
(inches)
(3)(3)(3)(3)(3) (3) (3)(4)(5)(6)(5)
B1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
B2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
B3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
B0.5-4 6.9 1.5 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 268.4 0.0006 4.0 661.6 0.0014 5.9 0.01 9.94 6.29
B0.1-5 3 1.3 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 252.1 0.0005 2.4 661.6 0.0014 3.3 0.00 5.79 3.60
B6 9.8 4.4 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 504.7 0.0011 6.5 661.6 0.0014 7.3 0.01 13.85 7.97
B7 20.9 4.2 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 488.4 0.0010 9.5 661.6 0.0014 11.1 0.02 20.58 12.06
B8 32.1 4.1 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 480.3 0.0010 11.2 661.6 0.0014 13.6 0.03 24.78 14.70
B9 39.9 4 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 472.1 0.0010 12.0 661.6 0.0014 14.8 0.03 26.84 16.06
B10 39.8 3.9 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 464.0 0.0010 11.8 661.6 0.0014 14.8 0.03 26.68 16.03
B11 39.7 3.8 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 455.8 0.0010 11.7 661.6 0.0014 14.8 0.03 26.52 16.00
B12 39.7 3.8 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 455.8 0.0010 11.7 661.6 0.0014 14.8 0.03 26.52 16.00
B13 36.4 3.8 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 455.8 0.0010 11.3 661.6 0.0014 14.3 0.03 25.66 15.45
B14 29.9 3.8 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 455.8 0.0010 10.6 661.6 0.0014 13.1 0.03 23.72 14.22
B14.7 2.2 3.6 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 439.5 0.0009 2.4 661.6 0.0014 2.7 0.00 5.07 2.92
NOTES:
Compacted
Density
(pcf)
Constrained
Modulus, D
(psf)
(1) Parameters were obtained from testing completed by EA. 81.5*470,000 (2)
(2) Assumed values.107.9 124,000 (2)
(3) Depths are based on the final proposed Tailings facility configuration 97.4 124,000 (2)
(4) [(H*density) regraded tailings] + [(H*density) interim sand layer].101.4
(5) = Increase in vertical stress / constrained modulus.101.4
(6) [(0.5H*density) radon barrier] + [(H*density) capillary break] + [(H*density) freeze layer] + [(H*density) erosion layer].Initial Void Ratio,
e0
Compression
Index, Cc
Compression
Ratio, Ccε
Compression
Ratio, Ccε (%)
Secondary
Compression
Index
Void Ratio,
Secondary
Compression
*Calculated using data obtained from the August 2008 Advanced Terra Testing Report 0.866 0.12 0.0642 6.42 0.0036 0.9677
10% Interim Cover +
Final Cover +
Secondary (Creep)
Settlement
Secondary
Settlement
(inches)
Total
Post-Closure
Settlement
(inches)
Material
Tailings
Tailings Regrading and Interim Cover
Radon Barrier (Clay)
Capillary Break (Sand)
Freeze Layer (Pediment)
Erosion Protection (Rock Mulch)
Location
No.
Final Cover
P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.12 Cover Cracking\Appendix H_Settlement and Cracking Analyses (2ft).xlsx
Project name:Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Project no.: 110444

Post-Closure Settlement Calculations for Cracking Potential Evaluation of the Radon Barrier
Thickness of
Tailinging
Material
(ft)
Diffrence in
Post Grading
thickness of
Tailings
Thickness of
Waste Sand
Fill Under
Cover
(ft)
Radon Barrier
(ft)
Capillary
Break
(ft)
Freeze
Layer
(ft)
Erosion
Protection
(ft)
Increase in
Vertical Stress
(psf)
Increase in
Vertical Strain
(in/in)
Consolidation
Settlement
(inches)
Increase in
Vertical Stress
(psf)
Increase in
Vertical Strain
(in/in)
Consolidation
Settlement
(inches)
(3)(3)(3)(3)(3) (3) (3)(4)(5)(6)(5)
C1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
C.1-2.2 5 1.3 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 252.1 0.0005 3.3 661.6 0.0014 4.8 0.00 8.07 5.10
C3 14.4 4.9 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 545.5 0.0012 8.3 661.6 0.0014 9.1 0.01 17.49 9.97
C4 25.3 4.5 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 512.9 0.0011 10.6 661.6 0.0014 12.2 0.02 22.78 13.25
C5 36.2 4.2 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 488.4 0.0010 11.8 661.6 0.0014 14.3 0.03 26.12 15.47
C6 47.2 4 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 472.1 0.0010 12.7 661.6 0.0014 15.8 0.04 28.50 17.12
C7 53.1 3.8 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 455.8 0.0010 12.8 661.6 0.0014 16.5 0.04 29.33 17.82
C8 53.9 3.6 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 439.5 0.0009 12.5 661.6 0.0014 16.6 0.04 29.14 17.87
C9 54.3 3.5 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 431.4 0.0009 12.4 661.6 0.0014 16.6 0.04 29.03 17.90
C10 54.7 3.4 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 423.2 0.0009 12.2 661.6 0.0014 16.7 0.04 28.93 17.93
C11 55.2 3.3 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 415.1 0.0009 12.1 661.6 0.0014 16.7 0.05 28.84 17.97
C12 55.7 3.3 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 415.1 0.0009 12.1 661.6 0.0014 16.8 0.05 28.92 18.02
C13 56.3 3.2 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 406.9 0.0009 12.0 661.6 0.0014 16.8 0.05 28.84 18.07
C14 33.2 2.8 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 374.3 0.0008 9.7 661.6 0.0014 13.7 0.03 23.43 14.74
C14.7 4.5 2.7 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 366.2 0.0008 3.6 661.6 0.0014 4.4 0.01 8.05 4.81
NOTES:
Compacted
Density
(pcf)
Constrained
Modulus, D
(psf)
(1) Parameters were obtained from testing completed by EA. 81.5*470,000 (2)
(2) Assumed values.107.9 124,000 (2)
(3) Depths are based on the final proposed Tailings facility configuration 97.4 124,000 (2)
(4) [(H*density) regraded tailings] + [(H*density) interim sand layer].101.4
(5) = Increase in vertical stress / constrained modulus.101.4
(6) [(0.5H*density) radon barrier] + [(H*density) capillary break] + [(H*density) freeze layer] + [(H*density) erosion layer].Initial Void Ratio,
e0
Compression
Index, Cc
Compression
Ratio, Ccε
Compression
Ratio, Ccε (%)
Secondary
Compression
Index
Void Ratio,
Secondary
Compression
*Calculated using data obtained from the August 2008 Advanced Terra Testing Report 0.866 0.12 0.0642 6.42 0.0036 0.9677
Secondary
Settlement
(inches)
Total
Post-Closure
Settlement
(inches)
10% Interim Cover +
Final Cover +
Secondary (Creep)
Settlement
Erosion Protection (Rock Mulch)
Location
No.
Material
Tailings
Radon Barrier (Clay)
Capillary Break (Sand)
Freeze Layer (Pediment)
Tailings Regrading and Interim Cover Final Cover
P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.12 Cover Cracking\Appendix H_Settlement and Cracking Analyses (2ft).xlsx
Project name:Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Project no.: 110444

Post-Closure Settlement Calculations for Cracking Potential Evaluation of the Radon Barrier
Thickness of
Tailinging
Material
(ft)
Diffrence in
Post Grading
thickness of
Tailings
Thickness of
Waste Sand
Fill Under
Cover
(ft)
Radon Barrier
(ft)
Capillary
Break
(ft)
Freeze
Layer
(ft)
Erosion
Protection
(ft)
Increase in
Vertical Stress
(psf)
Increase in
Vertical Strain
(in/in)
Consolidation
Settlement
(inches)
Increase in
Vertical Stress
(psf)
Increase in
Vertical Strain
(in/in)
Consolidation
Settlement
(inches)
(3)(3)(3)(3)(3) (3) (3)(4)(5)(6)(5)
D.1-1 1.8 0.5 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 186.9 0.0004 1.6 661.6 0.0014 1.0 0.00 2.61 1.19
D2 27.4 4.8 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 537.3 0.0011 11.2 661.6 0.0014 12.6 0.02 23.90 13.78
D3 49.6 4.5 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 512.9 0.0011 13.6 661.6 0.0014 16.1 0.04 29.74 17.50
D4 50.8 4.2 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 488.4 0.0010 13.3 661.6 0.0014 16.2 0.04 29.53 17.61
D5 51.3 3.8 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 455.8 0.0010 12.7 661.6 0.0014 16.3 0.04 29.00 17.60
D6 52 3.5 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 431.4 0.0009 12.2 661.6 0.0014 16.4 0.04 28.64 17.64
D7 52.6 3.3 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 415.1 0.0009 11.9 661.6 0.0014 16.4 0.04 28.41 17.67
D8 53.3 3.1 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 398.8 0.0008 11.6 661.6 0.0014 16.5 0.04 28.18 17.72
D9 54 3 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 390.6 0.0008 11.5 661.6 0.0014 16.6 0.04 28.12 17.78
D10 54.6 2.9 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 382.5 0.0008 11.3 661.6 0.0014 16.7 0.04 28.04 17.83
D11 55 2.8 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 374.3 0.0008 11.2 661.6 0.0014 16.7 0.04 27.92 17.86
D12 55.6 2.7 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 366.2 0.0008 11.0 661.6 0.0014 16.8 0.05 27.83 17.90
D13 56.0 2.2 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 325.4 0.0007 10.1 661.6 0.0014 16.8 0.05 26.93 17.85
D14 34.7 1.9 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 301.0 0.0006 8.4 661.6 0.0014 14.0 0.03 22.46 14.88
D14.8 1.3 1.7 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 284.7 0.0006 1.4 661.6 0.0014 1.8 0.00 3.26 1.95
NOTES:
Compacted
Density
(pcf)
Constrained
Modulus, D
(psf)
(1) Parameters were obtained from testing completed by EA. 81.5*470,000 (2)
(2) Assumed values.107.9 124,000 (2)
(3) Depths are based on the final proposed Tailings facility configuration 97.4 124,000 (2)
(4) [(H*density) regraded tailings] + [(H*density) interim sand layer].101.4
(5) = Increase in vertical stress / constrained modulus.101.4
(6) [(0.5H*density) radon barrier] + [(H*density) capillary break] + [(H*density) freeze layer] + [(H*density) erosion layer].Initial Void Ratio,
e0
Compression
Index, Cc
Compression
Ratio, Ccε
Compression
Ratio, Ccε (%)
Secondary
Compression
Index
Void Ratio,
Secondary
Compression
*Calculated using data obtained from the August 2008 Advanced Terra Testing Report 0.866 0.12 0.0642 6.42 0.0036 0.9677
10% Interim Cover +
Final Cover +
Secondary (Creep)
Settlement
Secondary
Settlement
(inches)
Total
Post-Closure
Settlement
(inches)
Material
Tailings
Tailings Regrading and Interim Cover
Radon Barrier (Clay)
Capillary Break (Sand)
Freeze Layer (Pediment)
Erosion Protection (Rock Mulch)
Location
No.
Final Cover
P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.12 Cover Cracking\Appendix H_Settlement and Cracking Analyses (2ft).xlsx
Project name:Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Project no.: 110444

Post-Closure Settlement Calculations for Cracking Potential Evaluation of the Radon Barrier
Thickness of
Tailinging
Material
(ft)
Diffrence in
Post Grading
thickness of
Tailings
Thickness of
Waste Sand
Fill Under
Cover
(ft)
Radon Barrier
(ft)
Capillary
Break
(ft)
Freeze
Layer
(ft)
Erosion
Protection
(ft)
Increase in
Vertical Stress
(psf)
Increase in
Vertical Strain
(in/in)
Consolidation
Settlement
(inches)
Increase in
Vertical Stress
(psf)
Increase in
Vertical Strain
(in/in)
Consolidation
Settlement
(inches)
(3)(3)(3)(3)(3) (3) (3)(4)(5)(6)(5)
E0.4 2.3 0 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 146.1 0.0003 1.7 661.6 0.0014 1.2 0.00 2.84 1.33
E1 13.4 4.5 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 512.9 0.0011 7.8 661.6 0.0014 8.8 0.01 16.59 9.56
E2 44.6 4.3 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 496.6 0.0011 12.9 661.6 0.0014 15.5 0.04 28.38 16.80
E3 49.5 4 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 472.1 0.0010 12.8 661.6 0.0014 16.1 0.04 28.97 17.41
E4 50.2 3.8 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 455.8 0.0010 12.6 661.6 0.0014 16.2 0.04 28.79 17.47
E5 50.6 3.4 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 423.2 0.0009 12.0 661.6 0.0014 16.2 0.04 28.22 17.45
E6 51.2 3.1 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 398.8 0.0008 11.5 661.6 0.0014 16.3 0.04 27.82 17.47
E7 51.8 2.8 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 374.3 0.0008 11.0 661.6 0.0014 16.3 0.04 27.40 17.49
E8 52.4 2.7 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 366.2 0.0008 10.9 661.6 0.0014 16.4 0.04 27.32 17.54
E9 53.2 2.5 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 349.9 0.0007 10.5 661.6 0.0014 16.5 0.04 27.08 17.60
E10 54 2.4 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 341.7 0.0007 10.4 661.6 0.0014 16.6 0.04 27.02 17.67
E11 54.9 2.2 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 325.4 0.0007 10.0 661.6 0.0014 16.7 0.04 26.77 17.73
E12 55.4 1.7 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 284.7 0.0006 9.1 661.6 0.0014 16.7 0.04 25.85 17.69
E13 55.9 1.3 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 252.1 0.0005 8.2 661.6 0.0014 16.8 0.04 25.07 17.66
E14 36.7 0.9 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 219.5 0.0005 6.8 661.6 0.0014 14.3 0.03 21.13 15.04
E14.8 2.8 0.7 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0
NOTES:
Compacted
Density
(pcf)
Constrained
Modulus, D
(psf)
(1) Parameters were obtained from testing completed by EA. 81.5*470,000 (2)
(2) Assumed values.107.9 124,000 (2)
(3) Depths are based on the final proposed Tailings facility configuration 97.4 124,000 (2)
(4) [(H*density) regraded tailings] + [(H*density) interim sand layer].101.4
(5) = Increase in vertical stress / constrained modulus.101.4
(6) [(0.5H*density) radon barrier] + [(H*density) capillary break] + [(H*density) freeze layer] + [(H*density) erosion layer].Initial Void Ratio,
e0
Compression
Index, Cc
Compression
Ratio, Ccε
Compression
Ratio, Ccε (%)
Secondary
Compression
Index
Void Ratio,
Secondary
Compression
*Calculated using data obtained from the August 2008 Advanced Terra Testing Report 0.866 0.12 0.0642 6.42 0.0036 0.9677
10% Interim Cover +
Final Cover +
Secondary (Creep)
Settlement
Secondary
Settlement
(inches)
Total
Post-Closure
Settlement
(inches)
Material
Tailings
Radon Barrier (Clay)
Location
No.
Tailings Regrading and Interim Cover
Erosion Protection (Rock Mulch)
Final Cover
Capillary Break (Sand)
Freeze Layer (Pediment)
P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.12 Cover Cracking\Appendix H_Settlement and Cracking Analyses (2ft).xlsx
Project name:Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Project no.: 110444

Post-Closure Settlement Calculations for Cracking Potential Evaluation of the Radon Barrier
Thickness of
Tailinging
Material
(ft)
Diffrence in
Post Grading
thickness of
Tailings
Thickness of
Waste Sand
Fill Under
Cover
(ft)
Radon Barrier
(ft)
Capillary
Break
(ft)
Freeze
Layer
(ft)
Erosion
Protection
(ft)
Increase in
Vertical Stress
(psf)
Increase in
Vertical Strain
(in/in)
Consolidation
Settlement
(inches)
Increase in
Vertical Stress
(psf)
Increase in
Vertical Strain
(in/in)
Consolidation
Settlement
(inches)
(3)(3)(3)(3)(3) (3) (3)(4)(5)(6)(5)
F1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
F2 19.5 3.2 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 406.9 0.0009 8.3 661.6 0.0014 10.7 0.02 19.02 11.56
F3 48.9 2.9 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 382.5 0.0008 11.0 661.6 0.0014 16.0 0.04 27.07 17.16
F4 49.5 2.7 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 366.2 0.0008 10.7 661.6 0.0014 16.1 0.04 26.83 17.20
F5 49.9 2.6 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 358.0 0.0008 10.5 661.6 0.0014 16.1 0.04 26.72 17.23
F6 50.4 2.5 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 349.9 0.0007 10.4 661.6 0.0014 16.2 0.04 26.63 17.27
F7 51 2.4 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 341.7 0.0007 10.2 661.6 0.0014 16.3 0.04 26.55 17.33
F8 51.6 2.2 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 325.4 0.0007 9.9 661.6 0.0014 16.3 0.04 26.27 17.36
F9 52.3 2 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 309.1 0.0007 9.5 661.6 0.0014 16.4 0.04 26.00 17.40
F10 53.1 1.8 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 292.8 0.0006 9.2 661.6 0.0014 16.5 0.04 25.72 17.45
F11 54 1.2 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 243.9 0.0005 8.0 661.6 0.0014 16.6 0.04 24.60 17.43
F12 55.0 0.7 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 203.2 0.0004 6.9 661.6 0.0014 16.7 0.04 23.62 17.43
F13 55.9 0.3 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 170.6 0.0004 6.0 661.6 0.0014 16.8 0.04 22.78 17.43
F14 38.3 0.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 146.1 0.0003 4.9 661.6 0.0014 14.6 0.03 19.54 15.11
F14.8 4.8 -0.2 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 129.8 0.0003 2.4 661.6 0.0014 4.6 0.00 6.99 4.88
NOTES:
Compacted
Density
(pcf)
Constrained
Modulus, D
(psf)
(1) Parameters were obtained from testing completed by EA. 81.5*470,000 (2)
(2) Assumed values.107.9 124,000 (2)
(3) Depths are based on the final proposed Tailings facility configuration 97.4 124,000 (2)
(4) [(H*density) regraded tailings] + [(H*density) interim sand layer].101.4
(5) = Increase in vertical stress / constrained modulus.101.4
(6) [(0.5H*density) radon barrier] + [(H*density) capillary break] + [(H*density) freeze layer] + [(H*density) erosion layer].Initial Void Ratio,
e0
Compression
Index, Cc
Compression
Ratio, Ccε
Compression
Ratio, Ccε (%)
Secondary
Compression
Index
Void Ratio,
Secondary
Compression
*Calculated using data obtained from the August 2008 Advanced Terra Testing Report 0.866 0.12 0.0642 6.42 0.0036 0.9677
10% Interim Cover +
Final Cover +
Secondary (Creep)
Settlement
Secondary
Settlement
(inches)
Total
Post-Closure
Settlement
(inches)
Material
Tailings
Radon Barrier (Clay)
Location
No.
Tailings Regrading and Interim Cover
Erosion Protection (Rock Mulch)
Final Cover
Capillary Break (Sand)
Freeze Layer (Pediment)
P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.12 Cover Cracking\Appendix H_Settlement and Cracking Analyses (2ft).xlsx
Project name:Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Project no.: 110444

Post-Closure Settlement Calculations for Cracking Potential Evaluation of the Radon Barrier
Thickness of
Tailinging
Material
(ft)
Diffrence in
Post Grading
thickness of
Tailings
Thickness of
Waste Sand
Fill Under
Cover
(ft)
Radon Barrier
(ft)
Capillary
Break
(ft)
Freeze
Layer
(ft)
Erosion
Protection
(ft)
Increase in
Vertical Stress
(psf)
Increase in
Vertical Strain
(in/in)
Consolidation
Settlement
(inches)
Increase in
Vertical Stress
(psf)
Increase in
Vertical Strain
(in/in)
Consolidation
Settlement
(inches)
(3)(3)(3)(3)(3) (3) (3)(4)(5)(6)(5)
G1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
G2 0 0.6 0 0 0 0 0 48.9 0.0001 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
G3 25.5 1.9 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 301.0 0.0006 7.6 661.6 0.0014 12.2 0.02 19.88 13.00
G4 48.7 1.6 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 276.5 0.0006 8.6 661.6 0.0014 16.0 0.04 24.65 16.89
G5 49.2 1.4 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 260.2 0.0006 8.2 661.6 0.0014 16.1 0.04 24.33 16.92
G6 49.6 1.3 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 252.1 0.0005 8.0 661.6 0.0014 16.1 0.04 24.19 16.94
G7 50.2 1.2 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 243.9 0.0005 7.9 661.6 0.0014 16.2 0.04 24.07 16.99
G8 50.8 1.3 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 252.1 0.0005 8.1 661.6 0.0014 16.2 0.04 24.36 17.09
G9 51.5 1 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 227.6 0.0005 7.5 661.6 0.0014 16.3 0.04 23.83 17.10
G10 52.2 0.7 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 203.2 0.0004 6.8 661.6 0.0014 16.4 0.04 23.26 17.12
G11 53.1 0.3 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 170.6 0.0004 5.9 661.6 0.0014 16.5 0.04 22.44 17.12
G12 54.1 -0.2 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 129.8 0.0003 4.7 661.6 0.0014 16.6 0.04 21.31 17.11
G13 54.9 -0.7 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 89.1 0.0002 3.3 661.6 0.0014 16.7 0.04 20.06 17.06
G14 40.3 -1.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 64.6 0.0001 2.4 661.6 0.0014 14.9 0.03 17.34 15.16
G14.8 1.7 -1.1 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 56.5 0.0001 0.9 661.6 0.0014 2.2 0.00 3.14 2.30
NOTES:
Compacted
Density
(pcf)
Constrained
Modulus, D
(psf)
(1) Parameters were obtained from testing completed by EA. 81.5*470,000 (2)
(2) Assumed values.107.9 124,000 (2)
(3) Depths are based on the final proposed Tailings facility configuration 97.4 124,000 (2)
(4) [(H*density) regraded tailings] + [(H*density) interim sand layer].101.4
(5) = Increase in vertical stress / constrained modulus.101.4
(6) [(0.5H*density) radon barrier] + [(H*density) capillary break] + [(H*density) freeze layer] + [(H*density) erosion layer].Initial Void Ratio,
e0
Compression
Index, Cc
Compression
Ratio, Ccε
Compression
Ratio, Ccε (%)
Secondary
Compression
Index
Void Ratio,
Secondary
Compression
*Calculated using data obtained from the August 2008 Advanced Terra Testing Report 0.866 0.12 0.0642 6.42 0.0036 0.9677
10% Interim Cover +
Final Cover +
Secondary (Creep)
Settlement
Secondary
Settlement
(inches)
Total
Post-Closure
Settlement
(inches)
Material
Tailings
Radon Barrier (Clay)
Location
No.
Tailings Regrading and Interim Cover
Erosion Protection (Rock Mulch)
Final Cover
Capillary Break (Sand)
Freeze Layer (Pediment)
P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.12 Cover Cracking\Appendix H_Settlement and Cracking Analyses (2ft).xlsx
Project name:Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Project no.: 110444

Post-Closure Settlement Calculations for Cracking Potential Evaluation of the Radon Barrier
Thickness of
Tailinging
Material
(ft)
Diffrence in
Post Grading
thickness of
Tailings
Thickness of
Waste Sand
Fill Under
Cover
(ft)
Radon Barrier
(ft)
Capillary
Break
(ft)
Freeze
Layer
(ft)
Erosion
Protection
(ft)
Increase in
Vertical Stress
(psf)
Increase in
Vertical Strain
(in/in)
Consolidation
Settlement
(inches)
Increase in
Vertical Stress
(psf)
Increase in
Vertical Strain
(in/in)
Consolidation
Settlement
(inches)
(3)(3)(3)(3)(3) (3) (3)(4)(5)(6)(5)
H1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
H2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
H3 0.4 0.4 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 178.7 0.0004 0.5 661.6 0.0014 0.7 0.00 1.25 0.77
H4 31.5 0.5 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 186.9 0.0004 5.8 661.6 0.0014 13.4 0.02 19.23 14.04
H5 48.5 0.3 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 170.6 0.0004 5.8 661.6 0.0014 16.0 0.04 21.83 16.59
H6 48.9 0.1 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 154.3 0.0003 5.4 661.6 0.0014 16.0 0.04 21.41 16.59
H7 49.3 0 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 146.1 0.0003 5.1 661.6 0.0014 16.1 0.04 21.22 16.61
H8 49.8 0 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 146.1 0.0003 5.1 661.6 0.0014 16.1 0.04 21.29 16.67
H9 50.3 -0.4 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 113.5 0.0002 4.1 661.6 0.0014 16.2 0.04 20.33 16.63
H10 51 -0.8 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 80.9 0.0002 3.0 661.6 0.0014 16.3 0.04 19.34 16.60
H11 51.7 -1 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 64.6 0.0001 2.5 661.6 0.0014 16.3 0.04 18.85 16.62
H12 52.6 -1.2 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 48.3 0.0001 1.9 661.6 0.0014 16.4 0.04 18.36 16.67
H13 53.1 -1.6 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 15.7 0.0000 0.6 661.6 0.0014 16.5 0.04 17.17 16.60
H14 40.7 -1.9 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 -8.7 0.0000 2.8 661.6 0.0014 14.9 0.03 17.80 15.26
H14.9 1.2 -2.1 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 -25.1 -0.0001 0.1 661.6 0.0014 1.7 0.00 1.78 1.71
NOTES:
Compacted
Density
(pcf)
Constrained
Modulus, D
(psf)
(1) Parameters were obtained from testing completed by EA. 81.5*470,000 (2)
(2) Assumed values.107.9 124,000 (2)
(3) Depths are based on the final proposed Tailings facility configuration 97.4 124,000 (2)
(4) [(H*density) regraded tailings] + [(H*density) interim sand layer].101.4
(5) = Increase in vertical stress / constrained modulus.101.4
(6) [(0.5H*density) radon barrier] + [(H*density) capillary break] + [(H*density) freeze layer] + [(H*density) erosion layer].Initial Void Ratio,
e0
Compression
Index, Cc
Compression
Ratio, Ccε
Compression
Ratio, Ccε (%)
Secondary
Compression
Index
Void Ratio,
Secondary
Compression
*Calculated using data obtained from the August 2008 Advanced Terra Testing Report 0.866 0.12 0.0642 6.42 0.0036 0.9677
10% Interim Cover +
Final Cover +
Secondary (Creep)
Settlement
Secondary
Settlement
(inches)
Total
Post-Closure
Settlement
(inches)
Material
Tailings
Radon Barrier (Clay)
Location
No.
Tailings Regrading and Interim Cover
Erosion Protection (Rock Mulch)
Final Cover
Capillary Break (Sand)
Freeze Layer (Pediment)
P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.12 Cover Cracking\Appendix H_Settlement and Cracking Analyses (2ft).xlsx
Project name:Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Project no.: 110444

Post-Closure Settlement Calculations for Cracking Potential Evaluation of the Radon Barrier
Thickness of
Tailinging
Material
(ft)
Diffrence in
Post Grading
thickness of
Tailings
Thickness of
Waste Sand
Fill Under
Cover
(ft)
Radon Barrier
(ft)
Capillary
Break
(ft)
Freeze
Layer
(ft)
Erosion
Protection
(ft)
Increase in
Vertical Stress
(psf)
Increase in
Vertical Strain
(in/in)
Consolidation
Settlement
(inches)
Increase in
Vertical Stress
(psf)
Increase in
Vertical Strain
(in/in)
Consolidation
Settlement
(inches)
(3)(3)(3)(3)(3) (3) (3)(4)(5)(6)(5)
I1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
I2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
I3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
I4 6.4 -0.5 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 105.4 0.0002 2.4 661.6 0.0014 5.6 0.00 7.98 5.85
I5 37.6 -0.8 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 80.9 0.0002 2.9 661.6 0.0014 14.5 0.03 17.46 14.80
I6 47.6 -1 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 64.6 0.0001 2.5 661.6 0.0014 15.9 0.04 18.35 16.14
I7 48 -1.1 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 56.5 0.0001 2.2 661.6 0.0014 15.9 0.04 18.11 16.16
I8 48.4 -1.3 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 40.2 0.0001 1.6 661.6 0.0014 16.0 0.04 17.56 16.15
I9 48.9 -1.9 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 -8.7 0.0000 3.4 661.6 0.0014 16.0 0.04 19.44 16.39
I10 49.5 -2.3 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 -41.4 -0.0001 3.4 661.6 0.0014 16.1 0.04 19.56 16.47
I11 50.3 -2.5 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 -57.7 -0.0001 3.5 661.6 0.0014 16.2 0.04 19.70 16.57
I12 50.9 -2.5 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 -57.7 -0.0001 3.5 661.6 0.0014 16.2 0.04 19.81 16.64
I13 50.6 -2.6 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 -65.8 -0.0001 3.5 661.6 0.0014 16.2 0.04 19.76 16.60
I14 40.0 -2.8 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 -82.1 -0.0002 2.8 661.6 0.0014 14.8 0.03 17.64 15.15
I14.9 0.2 -3.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 -98.4 -0.0002 0.0 661.6 0.0014 0.4 0.00 0.41 0.40
NOTES:
Compacted
Density
(pcf)
Constrained
Modulus, D
(psf)
(1) Parameters were obtained from testing completed by EA. 81.5*470,000 (2)
(2) Assumed values.107.9 124,000 (2)
(3) Depths are based on the final proposed Tailings facility configuration 97.4 124,000 (2)
(4) [(H*density) regraded tailings] + [(H*density) interim sand layer].101.4
(5) = Increase in vertical stress / constrained modulus.101.4
(6) [(0.5H*density) radon barrier] + [(H*density) capillary break] + [(H*density) freeze layer] + [(H*density) erosion layer].Initial Void Ratio,
e0
Compression
Index, Cc
Compression
Ratio, Ccε
Compression
Ratio, Ccε (%)
Secondary
Compression
Index
Void Ratio,
Secondary
Compression
*Calculated using data obtained from the August 2008 Advanced Terra Testing Report 0.866 0.12 0.0642 6.42 0.0036 0.9677
10% Interim Cover +
Final Cover +
Secondary (Creep)
Settlement
Secondary
Settlement
(inches)
Total
Post-Closure
Settlement
(inches)
Material
Tailings
Radon Barrier (Clay)
Location
No.
Tailings Regrading and Interim Cover
Erosion Protection (Rock Mulch)
Final Cover
Capillary Break (Sand)
Freeze Layer (Pediment)
P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.12 Cover Cracking\Appendix H_Settlement and Cracking Analyses (2ft).xlsx
Project name:Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Project no.: 110444

Post-Closure Settlement Calculations for Cracking Potential Evaluation of the Radon Barrier
Thickness of
Tailinging
Material
(ft)
Diffrence in
Post Grading
thickness of
Tailings
Thickness of
Waste Sand
Fill Under
Cover
(ft)
Radon Barrier
(ft)
Capillary
Break
(ft)
Freeze
Layer
(ft)
Erosion
Protection
(ft)
Increase in
Vertical Stress
(psf)
Increase in
Vertical Strain
(in/in)
Consolidation
Settlement
(inches)
Increase in
Vertical Stress
(psf)
Increase in
Vertical Strain
(in/in)
Consolidation
Settlement
(inches)
(3)(3)(3)(3)(3) (3) (3)(4)(5)(6)(5)
J1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
J2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
J3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
J4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
J5 12.6 -1.8 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 -0.6 0.0000 0.9 661.6 0.0014 8.5 0.01 9.35 8.56
J6 43.6 -2.1 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 -25.1 -0.0001 3.0 661.6 0.0014 15.3 0.03 18.40 15.68
J7 46.7 -2.3 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 -41.4 -0.0001 3.2 661.6 0.0014 15.7 0.03 19.02 16.11
J8 47 -2.7 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 -74.0 -0.0002 3.3 661.6 0.0014 15.8 0.03 19.08 16.15
J9 47.5 -3.3 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 -122.9 -0.0003 3.3 661.6 0.0014 15.8 0.03 19.18 16.21
J10 48.1 -3.7 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 -155.5 -0.0003 3.3 661.6 0.0014 15.9 0.03 19.29 16.29
J11 48 -4 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 -179.9 -0.0004 3.3 661.6 0.0014 15.9 0.03 19.27 16.28
J12 47.9 -4.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 -179.9 -0.0004 3.3 661.6 0.0014 15.9 0.03 19.25 16.26
J13 43.8 -3.8 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 -163.6 -0.0003 3.0 661.6 0.0014 15.4 0.03 18.44 15.71
J14 38.2 -3.8 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 -163.6 -0.0003 2.6 661.6 0.0014 14.6 0.03 17.25 14.86
J14.9 3.1 -3.9 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 -171.8 -0.0004 0.2 661.6 0.0014 3.4 0.00 3.64 3.45
NOTES:
Compacted
Density
(pcf)
Constrained
Modulus, D
(psf)
(1) Parameters were obtained from testing completed by EA. 81.5*470,000 (2)
(2) Assumed values.107.9 124,000 (2)
(3) Depths are based on the final proposed Tailings facility configuration 97.4 124,000 (2)
(4) [(H*density) regraded tailings] + [(H*density) interim sand layer].101.4
(5) = Increase in vertical stress / constrained modulus.101.4
(6) [(0.5H*density) radon barrier] + [(H*density) capillary break] + [(H*density) freeze layer] + [(H*density) erosion layer].Initial Void Ratio,
e0
Compression
Index, Cc
Compression
Ratio, Ccε
Compression
Ratio, Ccε (%)
Secondary
Compression
Index
Void Ratio,
Secondary
Compression
*Calculated using data obtained from the August 2008 Advanced Terra Testing Report 0.866 0.12 0.0642 6.42 0.0036 0.9677
10% Interim Cover +
Final Cover +
Secondary (Creep)
Settlement
Secondary
Settlement
(inches)
Total
Post-Closure
Settlement
(inches)
Material
Tailings
Radon Barrier (Clay)
Location
No.
Tailings Regrading and Interim Cover
Erosion Protection (Rock Mulch)
Final Cover
Capillary Break (Sand)
Freeze Layer (Pediment)
P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.12 Cover Cracking\Appendix H_Settlement and Cracking Analyses (2ft).xlsx
Project name:Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Project no.: 110444

Post-Closure Settlement Calculations for Cracking Potential Evaluation of the Radon Barrier
Thickness of
Tailinging
Material
(ft)
Diffrence in
Post Grading
thickness of
Tailings
Thickness of
Waste Sand
Fill Under
Cover
(ft)
Radon Barrier
(ft)
Capillary
Break
(ft)
Freeze
Layer
(ft)
Erosion
Protection
(ft)
Increase in
Vertical Stress
(psf)
Increase in
Vertical Strain
(in/in)
Consolidation
Settlement
(inches)
Increase in
Vertical Stress
(psf)
Increase in
Vertical Strain
(in/in)
Consolidation
Settlement
(inches)
(3)(3)(3)(3)(3) (3) (3)(4)(5)(6)(5)
K1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
K2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
K3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
K4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
K5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
K6 18.5 -3.2 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 -114.7 -0.0002 1.3 661.6 0.0014 10.4 0.01 11.73 10.57
K7 45.3 -3.4 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 -131.0 -0.0003 3.1 661.6 0.0014 15.6 0.03 18.74 15.92
K8 45.3 -4 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 -179.9 -0.0004 3.1 661.6 0.0014 15.6 0.03 18.74 15.92
K9 30.9 -4.7 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 -237.0 -0.0005 2.1 661.6 0.0014 13.3 0.02 15.49 13.56
K10 17 -5.1 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 -269.6 -0.0006 1.2 661.6 0.0014 10.0 0.01 11.17 10.11
K11 9 -5.4 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 -294.0 -0.0006 0.6 661.6 0.0014 6.9 0.00 7.57 7.01
K12 8.2 -5.4 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 -294.0 -0.0006 0.6 661.6 0.0014 6.6 0.00 7.13 6.62
K13 14.0 -5.2 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 -277.7 -0.0006 1.0 661.6 0.0014 9.0 0.01 9.96 9.09
K14 22.7 -4.8 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 -245.1 -0.0005 1.6 661.6 0.0014 11.6 0.01 13.15 11.73
K15 0.0 -4.8 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -391.2 -0.0008 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
NOTES:
Compacted
Density
(pcf)
Constrained
Modulus, D
(psf)
(1) Parameters were obtained from testing completed by EA. 81.5*470,000 (2)
(2) Assumed values.107.9 124,000 (2)
(3) Depths are based on the final proposed Tailings facility configuration 97.4 124,000 (2)
(4) [(H*density) regraded tailings] + [(H*density) interim sand layer].101.4
(5) = Increase in vertical stress / constrained modulus.101.4
(6) [(0.5H*density) radon barrier] + [(H*density) capillary break] + [(H*density) freeze layer] + [(H*density) erosion layer].Initial Void Ratio,
e0
Compression
Index, Cc
Compression
Ratio, Ccε
Compression
Ratio, Ccε (%)
Secondary
Compression
Index
Void Ratio,
Secondary
Compression
*Calculated using data obtained from the August 2008 Advanced Terra Testing Report 0.866 0.12 0.0642 6.42 0.0036 0.9677
10% Interim Cover +
Final Cover +
Secondary (Creep)
Settlement
Secondary
Settlement
(inches)
Total
Post-Closure
Settlement
(inches)
Material
Tailings
Radon Barrier (Clay)
Location
No.
Tailings Regrading and Interim Cover
Erosion Protection (Rock Mulch)
Final Cover
Capillary Break (Sand)
Freeze Layer (Pediment)
P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.12 Cover Cracking\Appendix H_Settlement and Cracking Analyses (2ft).xlsx
Project name:Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Project no.: 110444

Post-Closure Settlement Calculations for Cracking Potential Evaluation of the Radon Barrier
Thickness of
Tailinging
Material
(ft)
Diffrence in
Post Grading
thickness of
Tailings
Thickness of
Waste Sand
Fill Under
Cover
(ft)
Radon Barrier
(ft)
Capillary
Break
(ft)
Freeze
Layer
(ft)
Erosion
Protection
(ft)
Increase in
Vertical Stress
(psf)
Increase in
Vertical Strain
(in/in)
Consolidation
Settlement
(inches)
Increase in
Vertical Stress
(psf)
Increase in
Vertical Strain
(in/in)
Consolidation
Settlement
(inches)
(3)(3)(3)(3)(3) (3) (3)(4)(5)(6)(5)
L1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
L2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
L3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
L4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
L5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
L6 0 -2.5 0 0 0 0 0 -203.8 -0.0004 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
L7 24.6 -4.5 1.5 1 1 3.5 1 -220.7 -0.0005 1.7 661.6 0.0014 12.0 0.02 13.73 12.20
L8 16.5 -5.2 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 -277.7 -0.0006 1.1 661.6 0.0014 9.8 0.01 10.98 9.95
L9 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
L10 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
L11 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
L12 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
L13 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
L14 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
L15 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
NOTES:
Compacted
Density
(pcf)
Constrained
Modulus, D
(psf)
(1) Parameters were obtained from testing completed by EA. 81.5*470,000 (2)
(2) Assumed values.107.9 124,000 (2)
(3) Depths are based on the final proposed Tailings facility configuration 97.4 124,000 (2)
(4) [(H*density) regraded tailings] + [(H*density) interim sand layer].101.4
(5) = Increase in vertical stress / constrained modulus.101.4
(6) [(0.5H*density) radon barrier] + [(H*density) capillary break] + [(H*density) freeze layer] + [(H*density) erosion layer].Initial Void Ratio,
e0
Compression
Index, Cc
Compression
Ratio, Ccε
Compression
Ratio, Ccε (%)
Secondary
Compression
Index
Void Ratio,
Secondary
Compression
*Calculated using data obtained from the August 2008 Advanced Terra Testing Report 0.866 0.12 0.0642 6.42 0.0036 0.9677
10% Interim Cover +
Final Cover +
Secondary (Creep)
Settlement
Erosion Protection (Rock Mulch)
Secondary
Settlement
(inches)
Total
Post-Closure
Settlement
(inches)
Tailings Regrading and Interim Cover Final Cover
Material
Tailings
Radon Barrier (Clay)
Location
No.
Capillary Break (Sand)
Freeze Layer (Pediment)
P:\110444 Shootaring Closure Design\2.0 EA Technical Info\2.12 Cover Cracking\Appendix H_Settlement and Cracking Analyses (2ft).xlsx
APPENDIX H
CRACKING POTENTIAL OF RADON BARRIER

Table H-1
Calculations of Cracking Potential of Radon Barrier - Static Loading Conditions
Cross Section G1
Thickness of Radon Barrier (ft):1
Pt # X-Coordinate
Total
Static
Settlement
Total
Static
Settlement
STN STP
Local
Slope
Horizontal
Movement STN STP
Horizontal
Strain
(ft)(ft)(in)(in) (%)
0 0.0 0.00 0.0010 0.0010 0.0079 0.000032 0.0032
1 100 0.1 1.19 0.0105 0.0010 0.0057 0.0459 0.000007 0.000032 0.0019
2 200 1.1 13.78 0.0031 0.0105 0.0068 0.0544 -0.000035 0.000007 -0.0014
3 300 1.5 17.50 0.0001 0.0031 0.0016 0.0128 -0.000010 -0.000035 -0.0023
4 400 1.5 17.61 0.0000 0.0001 0.0000 0.0003 0.000000 -0.000010 -0.0005
5 500 1.5 17.60 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.000000 0.000000 0.0000
6 600 1.5 17.64 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.000000 0.000000 0.0000
7 700 1.5 17.67 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0003 0.000000 0.000000 0.0000
8 800 1.5 17.72 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0004 0.000000 0.000000 0.0000
9 900 1.5 17.78 0.0000 0.0001 0.0000 0.0004 0.000000 0.000000 0.0000
10 1000 1.5 17.83 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.000000 0.000000 0.0000
11 1100 1.5 17.86 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.000000 0.000000 0.0000
12 1200 1.5 17.90 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.000008 0.000000 -0.0004
13 1300 1.5 17.85 -0.0025 0.0000 -0.0013 -0.0101 -0.000036 -0.000008 -0.0022
14 1400 1.2 14.88 -0.0108 -0.0025 -0.0066 -0.0530 0.000008 -0.000036 -0.0014
15 1500 0.2 1.95 -0.0108 -0.0054 -0.0431 -0.000006 -0.0003
0.0170 Max. Tensile Strain =-0.00225
Plasticity index for the radon barrier =19
Tensile Strain of 0.107 % will cause cracking of the radon barrier
Therefore, there is no cover cracking potential
Table H-2
Calculations of Cracking Potential of Radon Barrier - Static Loading Conditions
Cross Section G2
Thickness of Radon Barrier (ft):1
Pt # X-Coordinate
Total
Static
Settlement
Total
Static
Settlement
STN STP
Local
Slope
Horizontal
Movement STN STP
Horizontal
Strain
(ft)(ft)(in)(in) (%)
0 0.0 0.00 0.0021 0.0021 0.0170 0.000029 0.0029
1 100 0.2 2.6 0.0108 0.0021 0.0064 0.0515 0.000000 0.000029 0.0014
2 200 1.3 15.5 0.0022 0.0108 0.0065 0.0517 -0.000036 0.000000 -0.0018
3 300 1.5 18.1 -0.0002 0.0022 0.0010 0.0080 -0.000008 -0.000036 -0.0022
4 400 1.5 17.9 -0.0001 -0.0002 -0.0002 -0.0013 0.000000 -0.000008 -0.0004
5 500 1.5 17.7 -0.0002 -0.0001 -0.0002 -0.0014 0.000000 0.000000 0.0000
6 600 1.5 17.4 -0.0002 -0.0002 -0.0002 -0.0016 0.000000 0.000000 0.0000
7 741.4 1.4 17.1 -0.0003 -0.0002 -0.0002 -0.0019 0.000000 0.000000 0.0000
8 882.8 1.4 16.6 -0.0001 -0.0003 -0.0002 -0.0015 0.000000 0.000000 0.0000
9 1024.3 1.4 16.5 -0.0002 -0.0001 -0.0001 -0.0010 0.000000 0.000000 0.0000
10 1165.7 1.4 16.2 -0.0002 -0.0002 -0.0002 -0.0013 -0.000005 0.000000 -0.0002
11 1307.1 1.3 15.9 -0.0022 -0.0002 -0.0012 -0.0095 -0.000017 -0.000005 -0.0011
12 1448.5 1.0 12.2 -0.0072 -0.0022 -0.0047 -0.0375 0.000016 -0.000017 0.0000
13 1589.9 0.0 0.00 -0.0024 -0.0012 -0.0097 -0.000001 -0.0001
0.0616 Max. Tensile Strain =-0.00221
Plasticity index for the radon barrier =19
Tensile Strain of 0.107 % will cause cracking of the radon barrier
Therefore, there is no cover cracking potential
APPENDIX I
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
HYDROLOGY, SURFACE COVER LAYER, AND
DIVERSION CHANNEL DESIGN

March 22, 2024 1 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

1.0 INTRODUCTION
The reclaimed tailings storage facility (TSF) will be protected from water and wind erosion
through a combination of offsite runoff diversion and rock mulch admixture surface facing,
discussed separately below.

2.0 SUMMARY OF SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT
Offsite drainage areas to the north and east of the TSF, excluding the mill site, will be collected in
a rock-lined channel, designed for the Probable Maximum Flood (PMF), and conveyed along the
north and east side of the TSF. Offsite runoff from the mill site and East Bluff will drain to the
north into the South Process Pond during the interim period. Once the mill site and east bluff is
reclaimed the drainage ditches will be extended to the main rock-lined channel. The diversion
channel will ultimately discharge into a natural drainage to the southeast of the TSF (Figure 1).
The proposed diversion will have a 20-foot bottom width, 0.5% longitudinal slope, and 3:1 side
slopes. Adjacent to the TSF, the side slope will be 5:1. The minimum channel depth will vary
from 8.3 to 9.3 ft, and the channel will be lined with a 24-inch-thick layer of 12-inch riprap.

To control onsite drainage, the main TSF cover will be sloped at 1.0%, and will incorporate a top
layer of rock mulch, consisting of a rock/soil admixture. At the interface between the TSF cover
and the west bluff, a 20-foot-wide strip of 12-inch riprap (identical to that used for channel lining)
will provide an erosion-resistant area for redistribution of any flow concentrations arriving from
the west bluff. The eastern 5:1 outslope of the TSF cover will also be lined with 12-inch riprap,
smoothly transitioning into the channel side slopes.

3.0 COVER DESIGN
EA designed the surface cover layer to be a rock/soil admixture. Per EPA’s Closing Small Tribal
Landfills and Open Dumps: How to Design Environmentally Safe Covers, the admixture cover is
explained as such (EPA 2012):

Technical Memorandum

To: Anfield Resources Holding Corp. From: Dylan Hoehn, P.E.
Company: Anfield Resources Holding Corp. Date: March, 22, 2024
EA No.: 110444

Re: Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Closure Design
– Hydrology, Surface Cover Layer, Diversion
Channel Design
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Hydrology, Surface Cover Layer, Diversion Channel Anfield Resources
Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 2 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

Gravel/soil admixtures provide excellent means to minimize erosion while allowing for
vegetation establishment without a significant reduction in evaporation (Waugh et al 1994,
Dwyer 2003). Erosion (Ligotke 1994) and water balance studies (Waugh 1994) sug gest
that moderate amounts of gravel mixed into the cover topsoil will control both water and
wind erosion. As wind and water pass over the landfill cover surface, some winnowing of
fines from the admixture is expected, creating a vegetated erosion-resistant surface
sometimes referred to as a ―desert pavement.

EA designed the surface cover layer per the guidance of NUREG-1623 (NRC, 2002), NUREG-
4620 (Nelson et.al., 1986), and EPA (2012). The proposed cover grading is shown on Figure 1.

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Hydrology, Surface Cover Layer, Diversion Channel Anfield Resources
Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 4 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

3.1 Rock Mulch Sizing
3.1.1 Hydrology for Rock Mulch Sizing
Design flows to size the rock mulch were computed with the Rational Method, using the Kirpich’s
formula (1940) for time of concentration. The probable maximum precipitation (PMP) storm event
was used as the design rainfall event, with rainfall data from HMR 49. The contributing areas were
calculated as unit widths to simulate sheet flow across the cover.

3.1.1.1 Contributing Area
The contributing area was calculated assuming a 1-ft unit width with varying lengths. Contributing
areas are summarized in Table 3-1. Sheet flow and flow direction is presented in Figure 1.

Table 3-1 Rock Mulch Cover Contributing Areas and Surface Descriptions
Location and Design Storm Incr. Length
(ft)
Cum.
Length from
Ridgeline
(ft)
Cum.
Length from
Start of
Cover
(ft)
Surface
Description
West bluff offsite area 890 890 0 Natural cliff
Adjacent to west bluff 20 910 20 Riprap
Within 1.0% main cover 85 995 105 Rock mulch
Within 1.0% main cover 200 1195 305 Rock mulch
Within 1.0% main cover 200 1395 505 Rock mulch
Within 1.0% main cover 200 1595 705 Rock mulch
Within 1.0% main cover 200 1795 905 Rock mulch
End of 1.0% cover 200 1995 1105 Rock mulch
5:1 side slope of cover 20 2015 1125 Riprap
5:1 channel side slope 45 2060 1170 Riprap

3.1.1.2 Time of Concentration using the Kirpich Equation
Time of concentration was calculated based on the following Kirpich equation per NUREG-4620.

tc = 0.0078 L0.770 S-0.385 (1)
where:
tc = time of concentration (min)
L = slope length (ft)
S = slope (ft/ft)

Time of concentrations for incremental lengths of the TSF cover are presented in Table 3-2.

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Hydrology, Surface Cover Layer, Diversion Channel Anfield Resources
Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 5 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

Table 3-2 Time of Concentrations
Location and Design
Storm
Incr.
Length
(ft)
Cum.
Length
from
Ridgeline
(ft)
Cum.
Length
from Start
of Cover
(ft)
Slope
(ft/ft)
Tc Path
Length, L
(ft)
Kirpich's
Tc
(min)
West bluff offsite area 890 890 0 0.54 890 1.8
Adjacent to west bluff 20 910 20 0.01 910 1.9
Within 1.0% main cover 85 995 105 0.01 995 2.1
Within 1.0% main cover 200 1195 305 0.01 1195 2.6
Within 1.0% main cover 200 1395 505 0.01 1395 3.1
Within 1.0% main cover 200 1595 705 0.01 1595 3.6
Within 1.0% main cover 200 1795 905 0.01 1795 4.1
End of 1.0% cover 200 1995 1105 0.01 1995 4.6
5:1 side slope of cover 20 2015 1125 0.20 2015 4.7
5:1 channel side slope 45 2060 1170 0.20 2060 4.8

3.1.1.3 Rainfall
The design event for evaluation of long-term erosional stability is the PMP event based on NRC
guidelines in NUREG-1623 and NUREG-4620. The PMP storm event results in the PMF. The
PMP 1-hour, 1-mile local-storm has a precipitation value of 8.3 inches, as taken from
Hydrometeorological Report (HMR) 49 (NOAA, 1984). This PMP rainfall of 8.3 inches was used
to design the surface admixture.

The cover design life, per 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 192(a), shall be effective for up
to 1,000 years, to the extent reasonably achievable, and, in any case, for at least 200 years. The
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has frequency rainfall data up to a
1,000-year frequency. The 1,000-year, 1-hour storm event has a rainfall depth of 2.7 inches. The
PMP is approximately three times greater than the 1,000-year event at the 1-hour storm duration.
For a 1,000-year design life of the TSF, at least a 10,000-year storm event should be used. EA
believes the PMP storm event meets the 1,000-year design life criteria and is a reasonably
conservative event to use for the design of the rock mulch.

The PMP rainfall was scaled to shorter durations using Equations 1, Equation 2 and NUREG-
4620, Table 2.1. The resulting rainfall depths and intensities are summarized in Table 3-3.

PMP rainfall depth = (% PMP) x (PMP) (2)
Intensity, i = rainfall depth (in) x 60 / rainfall duration (min) (3)

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Hydrology, Surface Cover Layer, Diversion Channel Anfield Resources
Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 6 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

Table 3-3 PMP Rainfall Depths and Intensities
Duration (min) % of 1-hr PMP Precipitation (in) Intensity (in/hr)
2.5 27.5 2.3 54.8
5 45 3.7 44.8
10 62 5.1 30.9
15 74 6.1 24.6
20 82 6.8 20.4
30 89 7.4 14.8
45 95 7.9 10.5
60 100 8.3 8.3

Scale factors were not necessary, based on the location and elevation of the Shootaring Canyon
Uranium Facility. For the time of concentrations less than 2.5 minutes, the intensity for a 2.5
duration was used. For time of concentrations greater than 2.5 minutes the precipitation depth and
intensity were obtained by interpolating between the values in Table 3-3. Rainfall intensities
calculated for the cover design are presented in Table 3-4.

Table 3-4 Calculated Rainfall Intensities
Location and Design Storm
Cum. Length from
Ridgeline
(ft)
Kirpich's
Tc
(min)
Use Tc
(min)
Rainfall
Intensity, I
(in/hr)
West bluff offsite area 890 1.8 2.5 54.8
Adjacent to west bluff 910 1.9 2.5 54.8
Within 1.0% main cover 995 2.1 2.5 54.8
Within 1.0% main cover 1195 2.6 2.6 54.5
Within 1.0% main cover 1395 3.1 3.1 52.5
Within 1.0% main cover 1595 3.6 3.6 50.4
Within 1.0% main cover 1795 4.1 4.1 48.4
End of 1.0% cover 1995 4.6 4.6 46.3
5:1 side slope of cover 2015 4.7 4.7 46.1
5:1 channel side slope 2060 4.8 4.8 45.8

3.1.1.4 Rational Method
The Rational Method was used to estimate runoff volumes. This method is commonly used in civil
engineering applications and is a method recommended by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
for design of cover systems for sites regulated by the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act
(UMTRA) of 1978 (DOE, 1989) and NUREG-1623. The Rational Method assumes that rainfall
occurs uniformly over the watershed at a constant intensity for a duration equal to the time of
concentration.

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Hydrology, Surface Cover Layer, Diversion Channel Anfield Resources
Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 7 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

Using the Rational Method, the peak rate of runoff (Q), in cubic feet per second (cfs), is given by
Equation 4 (the runoff units are in acre-inches/hour but are commonly rounded to cfs).

Q = C I A (4)
where:
C = runoff coefficient (dimensionless)
I = rainfall intensity (in/hr)
A = contributing surface area (acres)

EA selected runoff coefficients of 0.90 for the west bluff offsite area and 0.80 for sections with
riprap or rock mulch. Runoff coefficients were averaged by length (or area) for used in the rational
method. Design flows calculated using the Rational Method are summarize in Table 3-5. The
contributing area in Equation 4 is equivalent to the cumulative length from ridgeline assuming a
unit width of 1-ft.

Table 3-5 Design Flows
Location and Design Storm
Cum. Length
from
Ridgeline
(ft)
Runoff
Coefficient,
C
Length-
avg. C
Rainfall
Intensity, I
(in/hr)
Discharge,
QPMF
(cfs/ft)
West bluff offsite area 890 0.90 0.90 55 3.0
Adjacent to west bluff 910 0.80 0.90 55 3.1
Within 1.0% main cover 995 0.80 0.89 55 3.3
Within 1.0% main cover 1195 0.80 0.87 54 3.9
Within 1.0% main cover 1395 0.80 0.86 52 4.4
Within 1.0% main cover 1595 0.80 0.86 50 4.7
Within 1.0% main cover 1795 0.80 0.85 48 5.1
End of 1.0% cover 1995 0.80 0.84 46 5.4
5:1 side slope of cover 2015 0.80 0.84 46 5.4
5:1 channel side slope 2060 0.80 0.84 46 5.5

3.1.2 Manning’s Equation
Velocity and flow depth were computed with Manning's equation, simplified for wide, rectangular
channels. Manning's roughness values were assumed to be 0.035 for small rock mulch and 0.045
for riprap (Chow, 1959). Velocity and depth are provided for information only; they are not used
in the Abt-Johnson method for sizing rock mulch. The following equations were used in our
hydraulic calculations.

Q = (1.49/n) A5/3 P-2/3 S1/2 (5)
Q = V A (6)
A = y w (7)
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Hydrology, Surface Cover Layer, Diversion Channel Anfield Resources
Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 8 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

where:
Q = volumetric flow rate (cfs)
n = roughness coefficient
A = flow area (ft2)
P = wetted perimeter (ft)
S = slope (ft/ft)
V = velocity (ft/s)
y = flow depth (ft)
w = flow width = 1 ft

3.1.3 Abt-Johnson Method
The D50 of the rock mulch was sized using the Abt-Johnson method:

D50 = 5.23 q0.56 S0.43 (8)
where:
D50 = average rock size
q = unit discharge (cfs/ft)
S = slope of the cover (ft/ft)

A flow concentration factor of 3 is introduced to provide an appropriate degree of conservatism.
An initial band of heavy riprap is provided at the western limits of the cover to provide for
redistribution of flows originating from the offsite cliff area to the west. The hydraulic properties
and minimum rock mulch sizes are summarized in Table 3-6.

Table 3-6 Rock Mulch Sizing
Location and Design
Storm
Cum.
Length
from
Ridgeline
(ft)
Discharge,
QPMF
(cfs/ft)
Roughness,
n
Flow
depth, y
(ft)
Velocity,
Vavg
(ft/s)
Calc. D50
(in)
Use Min.
D50
(in)
Oversize
(%)
West bluff offsite area 890 3.0 0.045 0.29 10.6 7.5 n/a n/a
Adjacent to west bluff 910 3.1 0.045 0.96 3.2 1.4 12.0 785%
Within 1.0% main cover 995 3.3 0.035 0.86 3.9 1.4 2.2 56%
Within 1.0% main cover 1195 3.9 0.035 0.95 4.1 1.6 2.2 42%
Within 1.0% main cover 1395 4.4 0.035 1.01 4.3 1.6 2.2 34%
Within 1.0% main cover 1595 4.7 0.035 1.07 4.4 1.7 2.2 28%
Within 1.0% main cover 1795 5.1 0.035 1.11 4.6 1.8 2.2 23%
End of 1.0% cover 1995 5.4 0.035 1.15 4.7 1.9 2.2 19%
5:1 side slope of cover 2015 5.4 0.045 0.55 9.9 6.7 12.0 78%
5:1 channel side slope 2060 5.5 0.045 0.55 9.9 6.8 12.0 77%

The rock mulch is designed to have a D50 of 2.2 inches for the rock portion of the admixture. We
have calculated the percent oversizing, as shown in Table 3-6. A minimum oversizing of 16.7% is
required for aggregate found on site as discussed in Section 4.13 of the report text for the
reclamation and decommissioning plan. The TSF is in a “seldom saturated area” and outside the
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Hydrology, Surface Cover Layer, Diversion Channel Anfield Resources
Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 9 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

100-year flood plain (NUREG-4620). The degree of oversizing should be reevaluated once
materials have been obtained and if testing does not meet the values discussed in the Borrow
Source technical memorandum or the design requirements from Appendix D of NUREG-1623.

3.1.4 Filter Requirement – Leps (1973)
Per NUREG-1623 and NUREG-4620, the Leps (1973) equation was used to determine the filter
requirement for the cover based on turbulent flow through the rockfill:

Vv = W m0.5 i0.54 (9)
where:
Vv = average velocity (in/s) of water in voids of rockfill
W = empirical constant for specific riprap size
m = hydraulic mean radius
i = hydraulic gradient

Values for Wm0.5, taken from NUREG-4620, are presented in Table 3-7.

Table 3-7 Values for the Leps (1973) Equation
Rock Size m m0.5 W m0.5
(in) (in) (in1/2) (in/sec)
0.75 0.09 0.3 10
2 0.24 0.49 16
6 0.75 0.87 28
8 0.96 0.98 32
24 3.11 1.76 58
48 6.43 2.54 84

NUREG-1623 recommends that when the computed interstitial velocity, Vv, is less than 0.5 ft/s, a
filter is not needed. When velocities are between 0.5 and 1.0 ft/s, the need for a filter layer will be
dependent upon the type of soil material placed at the interface. A filter should be provided when
velocities are 1.0 ft/s or greater. The Leps (1973) calculations and filter requirements are
summarized in Table 3-8.

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Hydrology, Surface Cover Layer, Diversion Channel Anfield Resources
Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 10 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

Table 3-8 Interstitial Velocities and Filter Requirements
Location and Design Storm D50
(in)
W m0.5
(in/sec)
Slope
(ft/ft)
Vv
(in/sec)
Vv
(ft/sec) Filter Requirement
Adjacent to west bluff 12 38.5 0.01 3.2 0.27 Filter may not be needed
Within 1.0% main cover 2.21 16.63 0.01 1.4 0.12 Filter may not be needed
Within 1.0% main cover 2.21 16.63 0.01 1.4 0.12 Filter may not be needed
Within 1.0% main cover 2.21 16.63 0.01 1.4 0.12 Filter may not be needed
Within 1.0% main cover 2.21 16.63 0.01 1.4 0.12 Filter may not be needed
Within 1.0% main cover 2.21 16.63 0.01 1.4 0.12 Filter may not be needed
End of 1.0% cover 2.21 16.63 0.01 1.4 0.12 Filter may not be needed
5:1 side slope of cover 12 38.5 0.20 16.1 1.35 Filter required
5:1 channel side slope 12 38.5 0.20 16.1 1.35 Filter required

A filter is not needed beneath the rock mulch cover because the interstitial velocities are
significantly below the 0.5 ft/s threshold. A filter is required beneath the riprap on the 5(H):1(V)
slope along the channels. The riprap and riprap filter are discussed in a later section.

3.1.5 Rock Mulch Admixture Blending
The rock mulch admixture design consists of 30 percent ASHTO No. 1 gravel and 70 percent
pediment material. The EPA recommends an admixture blending of 25 percent aggregate and 75
percent base soil (EPA, 2012). EA is recommending 5 percent more aggregate than the EPA
recommendation to increase the erosion resistance of the cover. The gradations of the gravel,
pediment, and blended admixture are presented in Table 3-9.

Table 3-9 Admixture Gradation
Stone / Sieve
Size
(in)
Stone Size
(mm)
Percent of Total Weight Smaller than the Given Size
No. 1 Gravel Pediment Admixture
4 101.6 100 100
3.5 88.9 95 99
2.5 63.5 50 85
1.5 38.1 8 72
0.75 19.05 3 100 71
0.375 9.525 96 67
No. 4 4.76 92 64
No. 10 2 86 60
No. 20 0.841 82 58
No. 40 0.42 80 56
No. 60 0.25 78 55
No. 100 0.149 59 42
No. 140 0.105 37 26
No. 200 0.074 24 17
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Hydrology, Surface Cover Layer, Diversion Channel Anfield Resources
Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 11 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

3.2 Gully Formation Calculations
EA performed the calculations for gully formation within the rock mulch admixture cover per
NUREG-1623 and EPA (2012). Gully formation was calculated using mean annual flow and
empirical equations derived from historically observed gully formations. Scour depth and armor
layer thickness was calculated based on incipient particle size and the admixture gradation. EA
also performed a stable slope calculation to determine long-term stability of the cover. Gully
formation and stability calculations and results are presented in the following sections.

3.2.1 Hydrology for Gully Formation
EA used the mean annual flow to determine depth of gully formation (EPA, 2012). Design flows
used in the gully formation calculations were computed with the Rational Method, using the
Kirpich’s formula for time of concentration. The design rainfall event is 1-hour, 1-mile local-storm
PMP. Rainfall intensities were interpolated from Table 3-3 down to a minimum duration of 2.5
minutes. The hydrologic calculations were the same as to the hydrology for rock mulch sizing with
the exception of the contributing area and scaling the peak runoff:
1. Per EPA (2012) guidance, contributing area was calculated with a width equal to ¼ the
length, as illustrated in Figure 2.
2. EPA (2012) assumes a mean annual flow equal to 10-20 percent of the peak rate of run-
off. Therefore, the peak runoff resulting from the PMP was conservatively multiplied by
0.20 to calculate mean annual flow.

The cover at the location with the most contributing area has the mean annual flow of 169 cfs. The
hydrologic calculations for gully formation are summarized in Table 3-10.

Table 3-10 Hydrologic Calculations for Gully Formation
Cum.
Length
from
Ridgeline
(ft)
Width,
W = L / 4
(ft)
Contributing
Area, A
(acre)
Runoff
Coefficient,
C
Tc
(min)
Rainfall
intensity
IPMP
(in/hr)
Peak runoff
QPMP = C I A
(cfs)
Mean annual
flow
Qm = 0.2*Q
(cfs)
995 249 5.7 0.80 2.5 55 249 50
1195 299 8 0.80 2.6 54 357 71
1395 349 11 0.80 3.1 52 469 94
1595 399 15 0.80 3.6 50 589 118
1795 449 18 0.80 4.1 48 716 143
1995 499 23 0.80 4.6 46 846 169

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Hydrology, Surface Cover Layer, Diversion Channel Anfield Resources
Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 12 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

Figure 2 Contributing area per EPA (2012)

3.2.2 Channel Geometry at Critical Slope
EA estimated the channel geometry of a gully formation using guidance from EPA (2012). For
this calculation, the slope is assumed to be critical (i.e., a Froude number of 1). The channel
geometry is assumed to be a “V” ditch represented by Equations 10 and 11 and by Figure 3.

b = 37 (Qm0.38 / M0.39) (10)
b = 0.5 F0.6 Fr-0.4 Qm0.4 (11)
where:
b = width of flow (ft)
Qm = mean annual flow (cfs)
M = percentage of silts and clays in soils
F = width to depth ration = b / dh
Ft = Froude Number = 1.0

Figure 3 Gully Channel Geometry
For the given discharge point of geometry, the hydraulic depth (dh), defined as the flow cross-
sectional area divided by the width of water surface, is half of the gully depth (d). The percent silts
and clays used in this calculation is 18 percent, which is the percent passing the 200 sieve in the
admixture gradation. The cover has a maximum calculated gully formation depth of 23 inches.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Hydrology, Surface Cover Layer, Diversion Channel Anfield Resources
Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 13 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

The calculated gully geometry is summarized in Table 3-11. However, the depth of scour and
armor layer thickness will prevent gully formation of this depth as discussed in Section 3.2.4.

Table 3-11 Gully Geometry
Cum.
Length from
Ridgeline
(ft)
Mean
annual flow
Qm = 0.2*Q
(cfs)
Percent
silts and
clays, M
(%)
Width of
flow, b
(ft)
Hydraulic
depth, dh
(ft)
F = b / dh
Gully depth
d = 2*dh
(ft)
Gully
depth, d
(in)
995 50 17 100 0.58 173 1.2 14
1195 71 17 115 0.67 171 1.3 16
1395 94 17 127 0.75 169 1.5 18
1595 118 17 139 0.83 168 1.7 20
1795 143 17 149 0.90 167 1.8 21
1995 169 17 159 0.96 166 1.9 23

3.2.3 Incipient Particle Size – Shield’s Equation
The incipient particle size is the particle that is on the brink of movement at the assumed conditions
(EPA, 2012). Any increase in the erosional forces acting on the particle, due to an increase in
velocity or slope, for example, will cause its movement. This incipient particle size (Dc) can be
calculated using the Shield’s Equation:

Dc = τ/Fs(γs – γ) (12)
where:
τ = total average shear stress (pcf)
Fs = Shield’s dimensionless shear stress = 0.047
γs = specific weight of soil = 163 pcf
γ = water density = 62.4 pcf

The total average shear stress is given by:

τ = γ dh S (13)
where:
S = slope (ft/ft)
dh = hydraulic depth (ft).
S = slope (ft/ft)

EA calculated the incipient particle size of the admixture using a soil specific weight of 163 pcf
and water density of 62.4 pcf. The largest incipient particle size was calculated to be 0.13 in at the
eastern edge of the TSF cover. The incipient particle size calculations are summarized in
Table 3-12.

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Hydrology, Surface Cover Layer, Diversion Channel Anfield Resources
Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 14 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

Table 3-12 Incipient Particle Size
Cum. Length
from
Ridgeline
(ft)
Hydraulic
depth, dh
(ft)
Slope, S
(ft/ft)
Average
shear stress, τ
(psf)
Incipient
particle size,
Dc
(in)
995 0.58 0.010 0.36 0.08
1195 0.67 0.010 0.42 0.09
1395 0.75 0.010 0.47 0.10
1595 0.83 0.010 0.52 0.11
1795 0.90 0.010 0.56 0.12
1995 0.96 0.010 0.60 0.13

3.2.4 Depth of Scour and Armor Layer Thickness
The incipient particle size defines the maximum size of particle that will be eroded for a given set
of conditions (EPA, 2012). The material larger than the incipient particle size will not be displaced
or eroded and can form an armoring that will protect the channel from further erosion from similar
or lesser storm events. The depth of scour (Ys) to establish an armor layer is given by Equation 14
(Pemberton and Lara, 1984). EPA (2012) provides Figure 4 to illustrate the armor layer
development.

Ys = Ya [(1/Pc)-1] (14)
where:
Ys = scour depth (in)
Ya = armor layer thickness (in)
Pc = decimal fraction of material coarser than the incipient particle size

Figure 4 Armor Layer Development (EPA, 2012)
EA calculated the armor layer development using the conservative incipient particle size of 0.13
in, which is the largest incipient particles size from Table 3-12. The fraction of the admixture
material coarser than 0.13 in is 0.36, or 36 percent. The total admixture thickness was assumed to
be 12 in. EA calculated a scour depth of 7.5 in and a resulting armor layer thickness of 4.5 in.
NUREG-1623 recommends a rock mulch armor layer of 1.5 times the required D50, and it is
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Hydrology, Surface Cover Layer, Diversion Channel Anfield Resources
Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 15 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

common practice to use an armor layer of 2 times the required D50 for rock with a D50 smaller than
12 in. The calculated armor layer of 4.5 in is more than 2 times the required D50 of 2.2 in, as
summarized in Table 3-6. The coarse material larger than the incipient particle size, will control
erosion and for the armor layer. The armor layer will prevent further gully formation to depths
summarized in Table 3-11.

3.2.5 Allowable Shear Stress and Stable Slope
EA performed the stable slope calculations per NUREG-1623 for the cover surface admixture
layer. For rocky soils that closely simulate naturally-occurring desert armor and desert pavement
at a site in the semi-arid southwestern United States, the following equations are given by NUREG-
1623 to calculate allowable shear stress (Temple et al,. 1987) and stable slope (Horton/NRC).

t = 0.4 D75 (15)
Ss7/6 = [ 65*t5/3 ] / [ I*L*F*n ] (16)

where:
Ss = maximum stable slope (%)
D75 = 75% of rock passing the given sieve size (in)
t = allowable shear stress (psf)
I = rainfall intensity (in/hr)
L = slope length (ft)
F = flow concentration factor = 3 (NUREG-1623)
n = roughness coefficient = 0.03

If the maximum stable slope (Ss) is greater than or equal to the actual slope, the cover is stable.
The D75 is assumed to equate to the D75 of the rock to be used in the admixture, which is 3.01 in.
The allowable shear stress is calculated to be 1.20 psf. Rainfall intensity was calculated using the
Rational Method with the PMP rainfall depths as previously described, resulting in the same
rainfall intensities summarized in Table 3-4. The slope length is the same as the cumulative length
from ridgeline. The flow concentration factor was assumed to be 3. According to Chow (1959),
the roughness coefficient ranges from 0.025 to 0.035 for the rocky soil cover. EA conservatively
used a roughness coefficient of 0.035. The calculations resulted in stable slopes between 0.018 and
0.028 ft/ft. EA designed the cover at a 0.010 ft/ft slope. Therefore, according to the NUREG-1623
calculations, the cover slope will maintain long-term stability. The stable slope determination is
summarized in Table 3-13.

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Hydrology, Surface Cover Layer, Diversion Channel Anfield Resources
Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 16 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

Table 3-13 Stable Slope Determination
Cum. Length
from
Ridgeline
(ft)
Tc (min)
Rainfall intensity
IPMP
(in/hr)
Maximum
stable slope, Ss
(ft/ft)
Design slope,
S
(ft/ft)
stable /
not
stable
995 2.50 54.78 0.028 0.010 stable
1195 2.58 54.46 0.024 0.010 stable
1395 3.08 52.47 0.022 0.010 stable
1595 3.59 50.43 0.020 0.010 stable
1795 4.11 48.37 0.019 0.010 stable
1995 4.64 46.27 0.018 0.010 stable

4.0 DIVERSION CHANNEL DESIGN
EA designed a diversion channel to route stormwater flows, up to the PMF, away from the
impoundment without causing erosion. The diversion channel begins approximately 1000 ft
upstream of the impoundment, flows south along the east side of the impoundment, and terminates
approximately 600 ft downstream of the impoundment. The diversion channel was designed to
pass the PMF, determined by using the SCS method. Erosion protection was designed based on
methods recommended in NUREG-1623.

4.1 Hydrology for Diversion Channel Design
4.1.1 Rainfall and Design Storm
The design storm event for the diversion channel design is the PMP event. PMP rainfall depths
were taken from HMR 49 (NOAA, 1984) and an intensity-duration curve was created using the
precipitation scaling factors from NUREG-4620, as previously presented in Table 3-3.

EA used the SCS method to develop the basin losses and unit hydrographs. An SCS curve number
of 86 was chosen to reflect the average conditions of the watershed. The chosen curve number
represents a vegetation cover type consisting primarily desert shrub, a Class D hydrologic soil
group, and a fair hydrologic condition (USDA, 1986). Hydrologic soil class was determined by
the USDA Soil Survey online application (USDA, 2019). EA used an SCS type II storm to yield
conservative values for runoff.

4.1.2 Watershed Delineation
EA performed a watershed delineation of the contributing area reporting to the diversion channel
at a point to the east of the southern impoundment dam (Figure 5). The watershed delineation was
performed using ESRI ArcGIS (v10.6), and the topography is the 1/3 arc-second Digital Elevation
Map (DEM) from USGS 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) (USGS, 2021). The area of the watershed
was estimated to be 0.30 square miles (sq mi). The basin properties are presented in Table 4-1.

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Hydrology, Surface Cover Layer, Diversion Channel Anfield Resources
Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 17 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

Table 4-1 Diversion Channel Basin Properties
Area 0.30 sq mi
Imperviousness 0 percent
High elevation 4585 ft
Low elevation 4484 ft
Change in elevation 101 ft
Time of concentration length 5510 ft
Average Slope 0.0183 ft/ft

Figure 5 Watershed Delineation for the Diversion Channel

4.1.3 Time of Concentration
EA determined the time of concentration based on the equations in TR-55 (USDA, 1986). The
time of concentration flow path is presented in Figure 5. EA calculated a time of concentration of
0.29 hrs (17.6 min). EA used the TR-55 Worksheet 3 to perform the time of concentration
calculations (Table 4-2). Lag time was estimated to be 0.6 times the time of concentration, which
is calculated to be 0.17 hrs (10.6 min).

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Hydrology, Surface Cover Layer, Diversion Channel Anfield Resources
Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 18 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

Table 4-2 Diversion Channel Time of Concentration Calculations

4.1.4 Hydrology Model and Results
The SCS curve number, design storm depth, and basin characteristics were entered into the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineer’s (USACE) HEC-HMS model (USACE, 2023). Runoff volumes and
peak flows for PMF, as determined by the HEC-HMS model, were 106 acre-feet and 3742 cubic
feet per second (cfs), respectively.
Sheet Flow (Applicable to T c only)
Segment ID
1.Surface description (table 3-1)…............................
2.Manning's roughness coefficient, n (table 3-1)…......
3.Flow length, L (total L ч 300 ft)…........................ft
4.Two-year 24-hour rainfall, P2 …….......................in
5.Land slope, s…….............................................ft/ft
6.Compute Tt ….....................................................hr 0.05 0.05
Shallow Concentrated Flow
Segment ID
7.Surface description (paved or unpaved)…...............
8.Flow length, L…...................................................ft
9.Watercourse slope, s…......................................ft/ft
10.Average velocity, V (figure 3-1)…......................ft/s
11.Compute Tt ….....................................................hr 0.12 0.12
Channel Flow
Segment ID
12.Cross sectional flow area, a…..............................ft2
13.Wetted perimeter, pw….......................................ft
14.Hydraulic radius, r = a / pw…...............................ft
15.Channel slope, s................................................ft/ft
16.Manning's roughness coefficient, n…......................
17.Compute velocity, V…......................................ft/s
18.Flow length, L….................................................ft
19.Compute Tt ….....................................................hr 0.13 0.13
20.Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)….............................................hr 0.29
3.60
0.99
0.09


454.78
98.16
4.63
0.007
0.045
7.92
3710
Bare Soil
unpaved

1500
0.05
0.011
300
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Hydrology, Surface Cover Layer, Diversion Channel Anfield Resources
Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 19 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

4.2 Hydraulics
4.2.1 Diversion Channel
A diversion channel is to convey stormwater from north of the impoundment, along the east side
of the impoundment, through a rock cut at the northeast edge of the impoundment. For design and
calculation purposes, the diversion channel was divided up into several sections, as illustrated in
Figure 6a, Figure 6b, and Figure 6c.

Section 1 is the channel upstream and north of the impoundment. Section 2 is the section of channel
adjacent and to the east of the impoundment. Section 3 is the section of channel that is downstream
and southeast of the impoundment. Section 4 acts as a transition of the diversion channel to a wider
channel that exits onto natural cover.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Hydrology, Surface Cover Layer, Diversion Channel Anfield Resources
Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 21 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

4.2.1.1 Flow Calculation
EA performed hydraulic calculations to determine the diversion channel geometry and erosion
protection. The Manning’s equation was used to calculate the flow depth and velocity within the
diversion channel. Note that both drainage area and flow cross-sectional area are denoted as the
variable A, by convention.

Vavg = ( 1.486 R2/3 S1/2 ) / n (17)
Q = Vavg A (18)
R = A / P (19)
A = B y + z y2 (20)
P = ( B y + z y2 ) / ( B + 2 y (z2 + 1)0.5 ) (21)
T = B + 2 z y (22)
where:
Q = Design discharge, cfs
Vavg = Average velocity, ft/sec
A = Cross-sectional area of flow, ft2
B = Bottom width, ft
y = Flow depth, ft
P = Wetted perimeter, ft
R = Hydraulic radius, ft
z = Side slope ratio, ft H : ft V
S = Bed slope, ft/ft
n = Manning's roughness, 0.040 for riprap channels
T = Top width, ft

Geometric properties of the diversion channel are presented in Table 4-3. Flow characteristics,
calculated using the Manning’s equation, are presented in Table 4-4.

Table 4-3 Diversion Channel Geometric Properties
Diversion
Channel
Location
Stationing
Design Flow,
QPMP
(cfs)
Slope, S
(ft/ft)
Bottom
Width
(ft)
Left Side
Slope, zL
(_H:1V)
Right
Side
Slope, zR
(_H:1V)
Section 1 0+00 to 13+25 3742 0.50% 20 3 3
Section 2 13+25 to 21+20 3742 0.50% 20 3 5
Section 3 21+20 to 25+00 3742 0.50% 20 3 3
Section 4 25+00 to 26.50 3742 0.20% 50 3 3

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Hydrology, Surface Cover Layer, Diversion Channel Anfield Resources
Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 22 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

Table 4-4 Diversion Channel Flow Characteristics
Diversion
Channel
Location
Design
Flow, QPMP
(cfs)
Flow
Depth, y
(ft)
Flow
Area, A
(ft2)
Wetted
Perimeter, P
(ft)
Hydraulic
Radius, R
(ft)
Average
Velocity, Vavg
(ft/s)
Section 1 3742 9.3 447 79 5.7 8.4
Section 2 3742 8.7 474 92 5.2 7.9
Section 3 3742 8.7 474 92 5.2 7.9
Section 4 3742 8.3 693 119 5.8 5.4

The diversion channel does not have a designed freeboard since the design storm event is the PMP.
The PMP is already the most extreme storm event; therefore, additional freeboard is not necessary.
Flow depths in Section 1 are not met in all locations of the channel by the channel geometry.
However, Section 1 has the purpose of collecting flows rather than protecting the TSF from erosive
flows. Section 1 does not need to have a channel depth of 9.3 ft, but the surrounding area does
need to have positive drainage to the channel.

4.2.1.2 USACE Riprap Calculation
Riprap will be used for erosion protection of the diversion channel. Riprap was designed using the
Corps of Engineers' method, Equation 3-3 from EM-1110-2-1601 (USACE, 1994).

D30 = Sf CS CV CT d [ ( γw / ( γs - γw ) )1/2 V / ( K1 g d )1/2 ]2.5 (23)
where:
Sf = Safety factor, assumed to be the minimum value of 1.1
CS = Stability coefficient for incipient failure, 0.30 used for angular rock
CV = Vertical velocity distribution coefficient, 1.00 for straight channels, 1.25 used
CT = Thickness coefficient, 1.0 used for thickness of 1.5*D50 or greater
d = Local flow depth, ft. Same as y in notation followed above; d is USACE’s notation.
γw = Unit weight of water, 62.4 lb/ft3
γs = Unit weight of rock, assumed to be 155 lb/ft3
V = Local depth-averaged velocity, ft/sec, same as in Equation 17.
K1 = Side slope correction factor, use 1
g = Gravitational constant, 32.2 ft/sec2

For the selected coefficients in Equation 23 to be valid, it is assumed that the riprap will be angular
with a unit weight of at least 155 lb/ft3. If rounded rock is used, the riprap size and thickness will
need to be reevaluated.

The median riprap size required for erosion protection was calculated using the following equation.

D50 = 1.2 D30 (24)
The calculated D30 and D50 riprap sizes for the diversion channel are summarized in Table 4-5.

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Hydrology, Surface Cover Layer, Diversion Channel Anfield Resources
Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 23 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

Table 4-5 Riprap Size
EM-1110-2-1601 Shear Stress Rock Toe (Abt. et al. 1998) Selected
Diversion
Channel
Location
Design
Flow, QPMP
(cfs)
Riprap
D30
(in)
Riprap
D50
(in)
Shear
Stress, τ
(lb/ft2)
Riprap
D50
(in)
Slope,
S
(ft/ft)
PMF unit
discharge, qd
(cfs/ft)
Riprap
D50
(in)
Riprap
D50
(in)
Percent
Oversized
(%)
Section 1 3742 4.6 5.5 2.9 9.4 N/A N/A N/A 12 27%
Section 2 3742 4.0 4.8 2.7 8.8 0.010 5.7 7.1 12 37%
Section 3 3742 4.0 4.8 2.7 8.8 N/A N/A N/A 12 37%
Section 4 3742 1.6 1.9 1.0 3.4 N/A N/A N/A 12 256%

4.2.1.3 Shear Stress Calculation
EA used the USACE shear stress calculation to further confirm the riprap size is sufficient for
erosion protection of the diversion channel. Shear stress was calculated using Equation 25, and
required riprap protection was calculated using Equation 26.

τ = γw y S (25)
τ = a (γs – γw) (D50) (26)
where:
a = 0.04
γw and γs are as previously defined

Assuming γs is 155 lb/ft3 and γw is 62.4 lb/ft3, Equation 26 becomes D50 = τ / 3.7. The calculated
D50 riprap sizes for the diversion channel based on the shear stress equations are summarized in
Table 4-5.

4.2.1.4 Riprap Sizing of Toe
The embankment toe makes up the west side of the diversion channel. Per NUREG-1623, rock
toes, or toe basins, are often placed at the base of sloped embankments to: stabilize and/or anchor
rock placed on the side slopes; serve as a toe drainage channel; serve as an impact basin and
provide for energy dissipation from tributary flow; provide erosion protection at the toe; transition
flow from the side slope to adjacent properties; and/or provide gully intrusion protection to the
embankment. The embankment toe on the east of the impoundment and making up the west side
slope of a section of the diversion ditch will provide several of the aforementioned function. Abt.
et al. (1998) empirically derived an equation to compute the median stone size for riprap used to
prevent erosion from flow transition off of embankment side slope onto the toe region.

D50 = 10.46 S0.43 (Cf qd)0.56 (27)
where:
D50 = the median riprap diameter, inches
S = the embankment side slope in decimal form
Cf = the flow concentration factor, typically ranging 2-3, EA conservatively used 3
qd = the design unit discharge in cfs/ft
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Hydrology, Surface Cover Layer, Diversion Channel Anfield Resources
Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 24 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

Additionally, NUREG-1623 offers the following recommendations: angular stones be used; rock
should be extended outward a minimum of 15 median rock sizes; rock should be placed at a
thickness of about 3-D50. NUREG-4620 recommends that slope transitions areas, particularly
along the embankment crest, be protected at least 8-10 feet up-grade and down-grade of the slope
break. The calculated D50 riprap sizes for the diversion channel based on the embankment toe
equations are summarized in Table 4-5. EA developed a transition and diversion channel detail to
show erosion protection and depths (Figure 7).

Figure 7 Embankment Transition and Channel Detail
Additional protection is needed at the transition from rock outcrop to the west edge of the
impoundment. EA recommends benching the bedrock, if possible, to allow for a hard bedrock
erosion protection underlying the riprap (Figure 8).

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Hydrology, Surface Cover Layer, Diversion Channel Anfield Resources
Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 25 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

Figure 8 West Impoundment Transition Detail

4.2.1.5 Self-Cleaning
As recommended by NUREG-1623, the diversion channel is designed to be self-cleaning. More
specifically, the channel should be designed to store or flush the expected volume of sediment that
will enter the channel over a 1000-year period. A frequent storm event (10-yr to 100-yr) may be
near the 10% PMP of 374 cfs. This flow would result in velocities of 4.4 ft/s, 4.2 ft/s, 4.2 ft/s, and
2.7 ft/s for Sections 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. According to the NUREG-4620 Table 4.7, fine
sand and sandy loam will be transported at 2.50 ft/s and silty loam will be transported at 3.00 ft/s.
The material within the watershed that is susceptible to erosion is primarily silts and fine sands.
EA estimates that most material deposited in the diversion channel will be flushed out during storm
events on the order of a 10-yr to 100-yr frequency.

4.2.2 Dissipation Structure
EA did not design a dissipation structure to transition the diversion channel to natural cover. The
reasons the diversion structure does not warrant a dissipation structure include: 1) the diversion
channel slopes are shallow (0.5%) and become shallower in the most downstream section (0.2%),
and 2) the diversion channel flows through a bedrock cut that separates the end of the channel from
the impoundment. The following sections discuss the designed transition of the diversion channel
to natural cover.

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Hydrology, Surface Cover Layer, Diversion Channel Anfield Resources
Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 26 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

4.2.2.1 Scour Depth
Downstream of the impoundment, the diversion channel crosses a bedrock cut for several hundred
feet. For this reason, head cutting and backward erosion is unlikely and scour depth calculations
were not performed.

4.2.2.2 Transition to Natural Cover
The diversion channel transitions from a base width of 20 ft at Section 3 to a base width of 50 ft
at Section 4 before terminating at natural cover. Stormwater flows will have decreased exit
velocities as a result of the transition to a wider bottom width. For example, a frequent storm event
(10-yr to 100-yr) may be near the 10% PMP of 374 cfs. This flow would result in an exit velocity
of 2.7 ft/s.

4.3 Adjacent Watershed Analysis
There was concern about the adjacent watershed to the east of the impoundment watershed
potentially overflowing during a storm event and adding flow to the diversion channel. EA
investigated this adjacent watershed using similar methods as was used to calculate peak flows
and flow depths of the diversion channel. It was determined that, during the PMF, the adjacent
watershed has a peak flow of approximately 3700 cfs. The flood results in a flood depth of 4.9 ft
with an additional 4.2 ft of freeboard before flows enter into the watershed that contributes to the
diversion channel. Based on our preliminary investigation, EA determined that flood flows from
the adjacent watershed are not a concern. The adjacent watershed delineation is presented on
Figure 9, and the flow depths and terrain elevations are presented on Figure 10.

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Hydrology, Surface Cover Layer, Diversion Channel Anfield Resources
Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 27 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

Figure 9 Adjacent Watershed Delineation

Figure 10 Adjacent Watershed Flow Depth and Terrain
TSF
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Hydrology, Surface Cover Layer, Diversion Channel Anfield Resources
Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 28 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

4.3.1 Riprap and Bedding Gradations
Riprap shall use the recommended gradations for Type D as presented in NUREG-1623 and
reproduced in Table 4-6. Riprap layers are to be a minimum of 24 inches in thickness and have
increased thickness in transition areas per design requirements and/or drawings/specifications.

Table 4-6 Type D Riprap Gradation
U.S. Standard
Sieve Size
(Nominal)
Percent Passing
(by weight)
18-inch 100
12-inch 10-65
10-inch 0-40
6-inch 0-20
1-1/2-inch 0-5

As previously determined, the interstitial velocities within the riprap-lined channel side slopes are
significant and require a bedding filter (Table 3-8). NUREG-1623 recommends filter be placed at
impoundment side slopes, toes of slopes, transitions areas, diversion ditches and channels, stilling
areas, and flow impact areas. Bedding material will act as the filter underlaying the riprap. Bedding
shall meet the NUREG-1623 gradation requirements presented in Table 4-7. All bedding shall
have a 12-inch thickness unless noted otherwise on the drawings and/or specifications.

Table 4-7 Bedding Gradation
U.S. Standard
Sieve Size
(Nominal)
Percent Passing
(by weight)
3 inch 100
1-1/2 inch 50-100
3/4 inch 37-82
No. 4 20-50
No. 20 0-14
No. 100 0-5

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Hydrology, Surface Cover Layer, Diversion Channel Anfield Resources
Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 29 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

5.0 MILL SITE DRAINAGE
EA designed drainage ditches for the mill site up to the 100-year storm event. EA’s mill site
drainage design is for the interim period prior to the reclamation of the mill site and East Bluff.
The drainage design consists of four basins and five ditches that convey runoff into the South
Processing Pond. The 100-year design flow was determined using the SCS method. Erosion
protection was designed based on methods recommended in NUREG-1623. Once the mill site has
been reclaimed, runoff will be directed toward the main diversion channel that flows south,
adjacent to the TSF.

5.1 Mill Site Hydrology
EA performed a watershed delineation of the mill site area (Figure 11). The watershed delineation
was performed using ESRI ArcGIS (v10.6), and the topography is the 1/3 arc-second Digital
Elevation Map (DEM) from USGS 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) (USGS, 2021). The watershed
was divided into four basins and is estimated to be a total of 20 acres. The basin properties are
presented in Table 5-1.

Figure 11 Mill Site Drainage

Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Hydrology, Surface Cover Layer, Diversion Channel Anfield Resources
Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 30 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

For the precipitation, EA used the 100-year storm from NOAA frequency rainfall data. The 100-
year, 1 hour storm event has a rainfall depth of 1.48. EA determined the time of concentration
based on the equations in TR-55 (USDA, 1986). EA used the TR-55 Worksheet 3 to perform the
time of concentration calculations. Lag time was estimated to be 0.6 times the time of
concentration. EA calculated a time of concentration and lag time for each of the four basins, as
presented in Table 5-1. The SCS curve number, design storm depth, and basin characteristics were
entered into the USACE HEC-HMS model (USACE, 2023). A curve number of 86 was used for
each basin. Impervious percent was estimated based on area of buildings in each basin and is
presented in Table 5-1.

Table 5-1 Mill Site Basin Properties
Basin Area
(acre)
Area
(sq. mi.) CN Impervious
(%)
TOC
(min)
Lag Time
(min)
East 4.58 0.0072 86 10 11.4 6.9
Central 2.71 0.0042 86 40 4.2 2.5
North 6.09 0.0095 86 10 9.9 5.9
South 6.62 0.0103 86 40 13.5 8.1

Total runoff volume and peak flow for 100-year design storm entering the South Processing Pond,
were calculated to be 1.4 acre-feet and 45 cfs, respectively. Peak flows for each of the basins is
presented in Table 5-2.

Table 5-2 Mill Site Peak Flows
Basin Peak Flow
(cfs)
Runoff Volume
(acre-feet)
East 9.6 0.3
Central 6.8 0.2
North 13.6 0.4
South 33.9 0.8
Total into South Processing Pond 44.7 1.4

5.2 Mill Site Drainage
EA sized drainage ditches to convey stormwater from the mill site basins to the South Process
Pond. The drainage design consists of five drainage ditches to provide drainage from the mill site:
East, Central, North, South, and Drop Channel, as presented in Figure 11. The drainage ditches
were sized using the design flows from the HEC-HMS model output. The Manning’s equation was
used to determine flow depths and velocities, similar to previous approaches in the Section 4. A
freeboard of 1 foot was added to the ditches. Ditch design flows, geometry, flow depth, and
velocities are presented in Table 5-3.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Hydrology, Surface Cover Layer, Diversion Channel Anfield Resources
Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 31 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

Table 5-3 Mill Site Drainage Ditch Characteristics
Drainage
Ditch
Design
Flow
(cfs)
Length
(ft)
Slope
(ft/ft)
Manning's
n
Bottom
Width
(ft)
Side Slope
(_H:1V)
Flow
Depth
(ft)
Ditch Depth
(ft)
East Ditch 9.6 561 0.014 0.03 4 2 0.6 2
Central Ditch 6.8 597 0.012 0.03 4 2 0.5 2
North Ditch 13.6 2154 0.022 0.03 4 2 0.6 2
South Ditch 33.9 1564 0.006 0.03 4 2 1.4 3
Drop Channel 44.7 240 0.24 0.04 4 2 0.6 3

Ditches should not be lined with highly erodible material, such as silts. The East, Central, North,
and South ditches may experience velocities up to 3.7 feet per second during the 100 -year storm
event. Following storm events, the ditches should be inspected and maintained as needed. The
drop channel should be founded on bedrock or be lined with 12 to 18-inch riprap to
decrease/prevent erosion.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Hydrology, Surface Cover Layer, Diversion Channel Anfield Resources
Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 32 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

6.0 REFERENCES
Abt, S. R., T. L. Johnson, C. I. Thornton, and S. C. Trabant. (1998). Riprap Sizing at the Toe of
Embankment Slopes. J. of Hydr. Engr., ASCE, in press, 1998.
Bureau of Reclamation (BOR). (2014). Design Standards No. 13 Embankment Dams, Chapter 7:
Riprap Slope Protection, Phase 4 (Final). U.S. Department of the Interior. May 2014.
Chow, V. T. (1959). Open-Channel Hydraulics. McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2012). Closing Small Tribal Landfills and Open
Dumps. How to Design Environmentally Safe Covers Including Additional Design
Guidance for Arid Regions. EPA Design Guidance EPA-909-R-11-007.
ESRI. (2018). ArcGIS Software. Version 10.6. January 17, 2018.
Kirpich, Z.P., (1940). Time of concentration of small agricultural watersheds. Civil Engineer
10(6). June 1940.
Leps, T. M. (1973). Flow Through Rockfill. Embankment Dam Engineer, Joyn Wiley and Sons,
pp. 97-107, 1973.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). (1984). Hydrometeorological Report
No. 49: Probable Maximum Precipitation Estimates, Colorado River and Great Basin
Drainages.
Nelson, J.D., S.R. Abt, R.L. Volpe, D. van Zyl, N.E. Hinkle, and W.P. Staub. (1986).
Methodologies for Evaluating Long-Term Stabilization Designs of Uranium Mill Tailing
Impoundments. NUREG/CR-4620.
Pemberton, E. L. and J. M. Lara. (1984). Computing Degradation and Local Scour. Technical
Guideline for Bureau of Reclamation. January 1984.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). (1994). Hydraulic Design of Flood Control Channels.
EM 1110-2-1601. Office of the Chief Engineers, Washington, DC.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). (2023). Hydrologic Engineering Center Hydrologic
Modeling System (HEC-HMS). Software. Version 4.11. July 14, 2023.
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). (1986). Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds.
Technical Release 55. June.
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). (2019). Web Soil Survey. Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS). https://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/. July 31, 2019.
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). (1978). Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978.
L. 95–604, Nov. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 3021.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility
Hydrology, Surface Cover Layer, Diversion Channel Anfield Resources
Holding Corp.

March 22, 2024 33 Engineering Analytics, Inc.

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). (2021). USGS 1/3 Arc Second n38n111 20211215: U.S. Geologic
Survey. December 15, 2021.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). 2002. NUREG-1623, Design of Erosion Protection
for Long-Term Stabilization. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards, Washington, D.C.

LIST OF TABLES
Table 3-1 Rock Mulch Cover Contributing Areas and Surface Descriptions
Table 3-2 Time of Concentrations
Table 3-3 PMP Rainfall Depths and Intensities
Table 3-4 Calculated Rainfall Intensities
Table 3-5 Design Flows
Table 3-6 Rock Mulch Sizing
Table 3-7 Values for the Leps (1973) Equation
Table 3-8 Interstitial Velocities and Filter Requirements
Table 3-9 Admixture Gradation
Table 3-10 Hydrologic Calculations for Gully Formation
Table 3-11 Gully Geometry
Table 3-12 Incipient Particle Size
Table 3-13 Stable Slope Determination
Table 4-1 Diversion Channel Basin Properties
Table 4-2 Diversion Channel Time of Concentration Calculations
Table 4-3 Diversion Channel Geometric Properties
Table 4-4 Diversion Channel Flow Characteristics
Table 4-5 Riprap Size
Table 4-6 Type D Riprap Gradation
Table 4-7 Bedding Gradation
Table 5-1 Mill Site Basin Properties
Table 5-2 Mill Site Peak Flows
Table 5-3 Mill Site Drainage Ditch Characteristics

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 Cover Drainage Map
Figure 2 Contributing Area per EPA (2012)
Figure 3 Gully Channel Geometry
Figure 4 Armor Layer Development (EPA, 2012)
Figure 5 Watershed Delineation for the Diversion Channel
Figure 6a Diversion Channel Plan and Profile STA 0+00 to 9+00
Figure 6b Diversion Channel Plan and Profile STA 9+00 to 18+00
Figure 6c Diversion Channel Plan and Profile STA 18+00 to 26+50
Figure 7 Embankment Transition and Channel Detail
Figure 8 West Impoundment Transition Detail
Figure 9 Adjacent Watershed Delineation
Figure 10 Adjacent Watershed Flow Depth and Terrain
Figure 11 Mill Site Drainage
APPENDIX J
MILL DECOMMISSIONING PLAN FROM PLATEAU
RESOURCES (HYDRO-ENGINEERING, 2005B)

APPENDIX J.1
MILL DECOMMISSIONING PLAN
(HYDRO-ENGINEERING, 2005B)

8-1

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Section 8 12-05.doc
December 2005
8.0. MILL DECOMMISSIONING AND SITE CLEANUP
PRL intends to decontaminate salvageable equipment for unrestricted release. Equipment and
structures having no net salvageable value will be removed and placed in the tailings cell.
Contaminated soils and contaminated residues will be consolidated with the tailings and
stabilized in the EPPC. Disturbed areas will then be graded and seeded for growth of native
vegetation.

The mill site consists of the following:

Main Office Building Truck Scales Maintenance Shop
Ore Storage Area Bucking Room Warehouse
Grizzly - Dump Pocket Acid Tank Environmental Lab
Fuel Oil Tank Potable Water Tank Analytical Lab-Stacks
Raw Water Tank Wet Scrubber - Stack Reagent Storage
Conveyor - Tunnel Seal Water Tank Generator Buildings- Stacks
Pump House De-Mister Stack Vanadium Circuit Building
Grinding Leach Area
Counter Current Decantation Area
Precipitation - Drying - Packaging Area - Stack

Plans for contaminated soil removal and decontamination or demolition of the structures are
presented in the following sections.

8.1 Regulatory Requirements

All decommissioning activities will be done in accordance with the applicable requirements in
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Requirements, the current license, and other applicable
regulatory requirements. The work will be done as soon as practical in conformance with
10CFR 40.42(g) and Utah Admin. Rule R313-24.

The performance-based State of Utah license requires reviews of all operations and procedures
to assure that radiation exposure to workers and the public will be maintained as low as
reasonably achievable. At this time, it is believed that only one activity, the decommissioning of
the yellowcake building, has the potential to result in exposures exceeding that from normal mill
operations. Engineering controls, including the application of a fixative agent to control the
release of uranium, will be reviewed and approved by the Safety and Environmental Review
Panel (SERP). In addition to special engineering and administrative controls, standard
management controls will govern the decommissioning activities, including the use of Standard
Operating Procedures, Radiation Work Permits, and other administrative and engineering
controls utilized by the Environmental and Radiological Health Supervisor (ERHS), site
management; Safety and Environmental Review Panel (SERP), and corporate management.
Worker exposure concentrations will be measured utilizing one or more of the following
methods: Bioassay, TLD and/or air sampling as conditions warrant.
8-2

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Section 8 12-05.doc
December 2005
PRL will conform to the recordkeeping requirements in 10 CFR 40.36(f) and relevant
requirements in Utah Admin. Rule R313-24, where all records related to the decommissioning
will be maintained for review and transfer to the State of Utah. This includes current records
related to spills or releases and any known buried material or material outside of the radiation
control area. Records will be kept at the Corporation main offices at 877 North 8th West,
Riverton, WY.

The environmental and occupational safety impact of decommissioning the mill will be minimal
with the controls that have been outlined in the cleanup. See Appendix I for a list of Titles of
Standard Operating Procedures that are in place and will be utilized and/or updated or modified as
needed during the site reclamation and decommissioning. Standard Operating Procedures have
been added, updated or modified to reflect the requirements of the reclamation plan. See Section
3.3 for additional discussion on Radiation health and safety. The consolidation of the
contaminated soil and materials and placement in the capped tailings cells will eliminate this as a
potential source of release to the environment. Impacts to plants and animals should be negligible
due to the small surface area of disturbance and a relatively short reclamation schedule. The
impact to the water quality will be positive in that all contaminated materials will be placed into a
designed long-term disposal cell, making it less available for transport to surface and
groundwater. Negative impacts include increased water use for dust control and soil conditioning
and short-term degradation of the air quality during reclamation.

8.2 Disassemble and Dispose of Contaminated Equipment and Structural Materials

All materials and plant equipment unsuitable for unrestricted release will be placed in the tailings
impoundment for disposal. This includes contaminated residues from tanks or vessels identified
for decontamination to release criteria levels.

Table 8-1 lists the equipment anticipated for disposal. This equipment will not be
decontaminated. Non-degradable material will be placed into a tailings pit and flowable fill added
to fill the voids. The flowable fill to be utilized in reducing voids in and around mill demolition
material placed into the tailings cell is designed to reduce voids only and not provide support or
have strength after drying. The flowable fill is made up of cement, fly ash (class F or C), water
and onsite soil material. The ratio of the mixture will depend upon type of soil, water and fly ash
available. The mixture will be mixed onsite and poured into the demolition cell to the top of the
debris. The wood or other degradable material will be placed in single lifts no greater than 6-
inches thick and covered with sandy fill material. A limited number of small items, such as the
sump pump, will be buried with compacted fill prior to the placement of the cap. Pipe will be cut
into manageable lengths and placed in the disposal pit to be filled with flowable fill. A minimum
of three debris disposal pits are planned on top of the EPPC.

8-3
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Section 8 12-05.doc
December 2005
TABLE 8-1. List of Equipment Anticipated for Disposal into Tailings Facility
Equipment Construction Material
Ore grizzly Steel
Wet Scrubber Steel
Sulfuric acid tank Steel
Leach feed tanks w agitator Rubber coated steel
Leach 1st stage w agitator Rubber coated steel
Leach 2nd stage w agitator Rubber coated steel
Primary thickener 1st stage Rubber coated steel
Clarifier thickener 2nd stage Rubber coated steel
Sand filters Steel
Counter current decantation concrete pad Concrete
Reagent mix tanks Steel
Sodium chlorate tank Steel
Solvent extraction tanks, mixers Fiberglass
Solvent extraction scrubber Fiberglass
Precipitation solution tank Fiberglass
Yellow Cake precipitation tanks Rubber coated steel
Yellow Cake thickener Rubber coated steel
Yellow Cake drum filters Steel
Yellow Cake calciner Masonry & steel
Yellow Cake impact crusher Steel
Yellow Cake Scrubber Steel
Tailings slurry line HDPE pipe
Dust/fume collector Steel, fiberglass
Pumps, piping, electric motors and other misc. Steel, rubber coated steel,
fiberglass, copper
Vanadium Circuit
Misc. concrete and rebar Concrete, steel
Contaminated yard area Steel, fiberglass
8.3 Decontamination of Tools, Equipment and Buildings for Unconditional Use
All tools, equipment, and structures considered for unrestricted release will be decontaminated
prior to monitoring. This includes all building surfaces classified as MARSSIM Class 1 and Class
2 (as defined in Appendix H). Decontamination methods include a combination of washing, high-
pressure sprays, or steam cleaning. No hazardous waste constituents will be used in the
decontamination process. The surfaces will be air dried prior to radiological monitoring.
Table 8-2 is a list of equipment and buildings that are anticipated to be cleaned and released. Any
of the equipment and buildings on this list may be moved to the disposal list if cleanup efforts are
not beneficial or the cost of cleanup exceeds the salvage value.
Footnote: Table 8-1 does not reflect the 2024 proposed Mill. The correct equipment list for disposal into the tailings
facility is included in Table 5-1 of text of main report.
8-4
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Section 8 12-05.doc
December 2005
TABLE 8-2. List of Equipment/Buildings Anticipated for Unrestricted Release
Equipment Size Construction Materials
Office building 25’x80’ metal frame with metal siding, wood and
Desks, file chairs gypsum board interior
Guard station wood frame with wood siding and gypsum
board
Scale steel and wood
Sample preparation building steel
Ore Hopper steel
Conveyor apron feed steel
Conveyor structure steel
Belt rubber composite
Fresh water tanks –2 tanks steel
Pump/fire house building 20’x50’ concrete, steel frame and steel siding
Temporary gensets
Powerhouse building 60’x90’ steel frame and steel siding
3-gensets complete
2-air compressors
Control panels
Dry (change rooms)
Diesel fuel tank steel
Electric switchgear
Transformers
SAG mill
Controls
Screens
Vanadium building
Mill control room instrumentation
Mill office area wood/sheet rock
Counter current decantation tanks rubber lined steel
Ammonia tank steel
Unloading pump
Kerosene tank steel
Pumping system
Laboratory building 45’x85’ metal frame with metal siding, wood and
Lab equipment gypsum board interior
Maintenance shop building 75’x120’ steel frame and steel siding
Equipment
Warehouse building 70’x75’ metal frame with metal siding, wood and
gypsum board interior
Main mill building steel frame and steel siding
Solvent extraction 70’x100’
Precipitation 40’x70’
Reagent 40’x70’
Grinding and leach 70’120’
Footnote: Table 8-2 does not reflect the 2024 proposed Mill. The correct equipment list for disposal into the
tailings facility is included in Table 5-2 of text of main report.
8-5
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Section 8 12-05.doc
December 2005
8.3.1 Monitoring and Release of Tools, Equipment and Buildings
Tools and equipment with potential radiological contamination will be monitored prior to release
using existing standard operating procedures. Tools and equipment meeting the criteria in NRC
guidance document "Guidelines for Decontamination of Facilities and Equipment Prior to Release
for Unrestricted Use of Termination of Licenses for Byproduct, Source, or Special Nuclear
Material, dated May 1987" will be released for unrestricted use.
Release criteria have been developed for building surfaces following NRC Regulation in 10 CFR
40, Appendix A and 10 CFR 20 and related sections of Utah Admin. Rule R313-24. The code,
RESRAD-Build, was used to calculate the total effective dose equivalent (TEDE) to future
occupants of the buildings when exposed to surface contamination from yellowcake and process
liquids. It was assumed that the buildings will be used for industrial purposes and that workers
occupying the buildings are the critical group. Appendix G presents the results of the TEDE
modeling where a gross alpha contamination limit of 700 dpm/100 cm2 is proposed. This limit
conforms to the 10 CFR 20 TEDE limit of 25 mrem/y. The State of Utah requires the use of the
Benchmark Approach for uranium recovery facilities, where the TEDE was calculated in
Appendix E to be 34 mrem/y. This would have allowed approximately 950 dpm total alpha
contamination levels. Because of ALARA considerations, the 700 dpm/100 cm2 limit will be
used.
The dose modeling presented in Appendix G showed that the dose from yellowcake was very
similar to the dose from process liquids, if normalized to the gross alpha emission rate. Therefore
a gross alpha contamination limit of 700 dpm/ 100 cm2 will be applied to all buildings surfaces.
The removable limit was established as 20 percent of the total limit, based on existing mill building
surface contamination levels for total and removable.
A MARSSIM-based characterization and verification plan was developed and presented in
Appendix H. This plan will be followed to demonstrate compliance with the surface
contamination limits for building surfaces. Buildings will be monitored and released according to
the monitoring procedures and release criteria presented in Appendices G and H. Areas within
buildings showing evidence of possible penetration of process solutions will be evaluated for
possible subsurface contamination. Based upon exposure of the building or area of the building to
process solution that could be carried below the concrete floor, coring will be conducted in the
SX, grinding, leaching and yellowcake sump areas. The cored concrete will be tested for process
contamination (i.e. retained uranium and Ra-226) and the soil beneath the concrete should be
tested in fifteen (15) centimeter intervals to determine if it has been contaminated. If the
buildings, slabs and soils beneath the slabs are not contaminated, the buildings shall be released for
unrestricted use, provided the building surfaces meet the release criteria and radiological
monitoring requirements in Appendices G and H, respectively. Otherwise, the buildings will be
demolished, the slabs removed, and the underlying soils removed (if contaminated) and all
contaminated materials shall be placed in the tailings impoundment. Releasable concrete slabs may
be covered with two (2) feet of clean native borrow soils in lieu of removal and disposal in the
impoundment area.
8-6
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Section 8 12-05.doc
December 2005
8.3.2 Disposal of Non-radiological or Laboratory Chemicals
All reagents and laboratory chemicals remaining on site will be disposed of in conformance with
all applicable federal and state regulations pertaining to the transport and disposal of hazardous
material, where applicable. Potentially contaminated reagents and chemicals will be tested for
byproduct contamination before transfer. Laboratory chemicals that did not come in contact with
the uranium recovery process, and are not contaminated with radionuclides, will be transferred off
site.
Two non-radiological hazards on the site are sodium chlorate and sulfuric acid. These hazards
will be encountered during the decommissioning of the sodium chlorate and sulfuric acid storage
tanks and distribution lines. PRL has identified an outside consultant with experience in handling
these two chemicals under uranium mill site conditions and PRL will utilize his services.
8.3.3 Disposal of Decontamination Wash Water
The facility slabs are constructed to allow drainage of liquids to a sump. All decontamination
water will drain to these sumps. Decontamination water will be disposed of in the tailings cell.
This water will be used for dust and moisture control for the tailings reclamation and also used in
the flowable fill mixing.
8.4 Contaminated Soil Cleanup
Section 3 presents the results of a recent radiological characterization survey that shows areas of
the site where soil contamination exists. The survey shows that soil contamination is limited to
areas of known spills and the ore storage area. The exact boundaries of the areas cannot be
defined at this time since most of the areas were influence by gamma shine from nearby building
components, ore piles, or tailings. The affected areas will be remediated using more sensitive
survey equipment to assure compliance with the cleanup criteria. In order to assure that the
extent of the area has been defined, a 10-meter buffer area (considered Class II and Class III in
MARSSIM terminology) contiguous to each contaminated area will be evaluated for potential
contamination. The buffer zone for the ore storage area will be 20-meters wide. The site cleanup
criteria and procedures are presented in the following subsections.
8.4.1 Cleanup Limits for Soils
The contaminants on the site have been determined to be uranium ore, process solution residuals,
Th-230, and to a lesser extent, uranium tailings. No evaporation ponds currently exist at this site
except for the very small lined pit on the tailings where the cross valley berm sump water is
pumped. This lined pit is normally dry. The cleanup criteria for tailings is given in 10 CFR 20,
Appendix A and referenced in Utah Admin. Rule R313-24. The criteria require the cleanup of
Ra-226 to 5 pCi/g above background, averaged over the surface 15-cm depth layer and an area of
100 m2. The limit for subsurface layers is 15 pCi/g.
8-7
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Section 8 12-05.doc
December 2005
For radionuclide mixes that are different than uranium tailings, the cleanup criteria are to be based
on the Benchmark Approach, where the site specific TEDE (Benchmark Dose) to the critical
receptor is calculated using Ra-226 at 5 pCi/g in surface soils. The site-specific contaminant
levels are then adjusted so that the TEDE does not exceed the Benchmark Dose.
The radionuclide mix of process solution residuals and uranium ore are identical, based on process
knowledge. Therefore the Benchmark Approach was used to develop the cleanup criteria using a
radionuclide mix of U-238 and U-235 with the progeny in secular equilibrium and assuming the
natural abundance ratios for the uranium isotopes. The analysis, presented in Appendix E, limits
the natural uranium contamination in soil to 9.1 pCi/g (13.4 mg/kg). This corresponds to a Ra-
226 concentration of 4.4 pCi/g above background. For subsurface layers, it is assumed that the
Ra-226 concentration limit would be 3 times the surface layer (similar to that of tailings), or 13
pCi/g above background levels. ALARA considerations require that an effort be made to reduce
these concentrations to as low as reasonably achievable levels.
The area shown as “F” in Figure 3-3A consists of approximately 6.5 acres and is potentially
contaminated by Th-230 from a tailings water spill. Because the contaminants were originally
deposited within the pool of fugitive solution, the distribution of Th-230 at the time of the spill
was likely fairly uniform within the pool area. Some cleanup of the 6.5 acres affected by the fluid
had been done shortly after the spill, and there is currently less than one acre exhibiting elevated
surface gamma-ray exposure rates, attributable to Ra-226 contamination. The measured Ra-226
and Th-230 concentrations in soil samples taken from this small area were less than 35 and 200
pCi/g, respectively. The field gross alpha method will be applied to areas previously determined
to be free of gamma-emitting radionuclides. Therefore alpha emissions above natural background
levels should be attributable primarily to the decay of Th-230. Prior to applying the method at
Shootaring, a set of data will be obtained using soil samples collected from the affected area and
comparing the on-site Th-230 analyses to that of a vendor laboratory. This will result in site
specific performance parameters (efficiency and MDA) for the gross alpha method. After
reclamation, this area will be a sediment catch basin formed by the base of the Shootaring Dam
for Cell 1 reclamation or part of the Cell 2 reclamation. The dam will be cut to an elevation
where sediment will be retained for the Cell 1 reclamation plan. The water dissipates by
evaporation and seepage into the vadose zone. Over time, several feet of sediment will collect
above Area F. Because of the undesirability of this area as a building or camping site, no people
are likely to spend time there. This situation therefore does not lend itself to developing cleanup
criteria using the Benchmark Approach since even short-time occupation of the area is unlikely
since it is in the flood plain for the Cell 1 reclamation plan. Under the Cell 2 reclamation plan, the
entire area will be beneath the reclaimed tailings Cell 2.
Since cleanup criteria for Th-230 contaminated soils do not exist, the Benchmark approach and an
alternative calculation comparing Rn-222 releases were considered for establishing the cleanup
criteria. The Benchmark method limits the residual radionuclide concentrations such that the dose
is no larger than the dose from occupancy of the site if the surface soils were contaminated with
Ra-226 at 5 pCi/g. The dose from radon emissions is specifically excluded. Several exposure
scenarios for developing Th-230 cleanup criteria for this area were considered. For scenarios
8-8
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Section 8 12-05.doc
December 2005
where short-term occupancy of the site is probable (camper, hunter, or hiker) the direct exposure
as well as airborne particulate exposure to occupants would be very high if the surface soils were
contaminated at 5 pCi/g Ra-226, compared to the exposures from Th-230 contamination lying
beneath a 46-cm soil cover. Another exposure route considered was the use of water from an
aquifer beneath the site as drinking water for nearby residents. However, it is widely known that
Th-230 is immobile in near-neutral pH water. These exposure pathways lead to an unreasonably
high Th-230 cleanup criterion. Thus the Benchmark dose assessment method was not applied at
this site. The only significant exposure pathway from residual Th-230 results from Rn-222
releases from the in-growth of Ra-226. Since 10 CFR Part 40, Appendix A already has a
standard for subsurface Ra-226, PRL proposes to limit the existing Th-230 concentrations in any
15-cm layer and 100-m2 area to that which would result in a maximum of 15 pCi/g of Ra-226
above background at any time during the next 1,000 years. This proposed approach is an
alternate calculation for meeting the existing Ra-226 standard.
A minimum of 46 cm (18 in.) thick clean soil cover will be applied to the entire area to limit
airborne erosion from this area until covered by sediment for the Cell 1 reclamation plan. If only
Th-230 exists as a contaminant, then an additional 42 pCi/g of Th-230 will result in 15 pCi/g of
Ra-226 at the end of 1,000 years.
The current Th-230 concentrations are much higher than the Ra-226 concentrations and therefore
the Bateman equations show that the maximum Ra-226 concentration will occur at the end of the
1,000-year period. Therefore, PRL will limit the Ra-226 to 15 pCi/g above background, where
the Ra-226 concentration is calculated by the equation
Ra-226 (pCi/g) = 0.65 Ra-226E (pCi/g) + 0.35 Th-230E (pCi/g)
where the subscript “E” indicates currently existing concentrations.
A statistical analysis of the preoperational natural background data is presented in Appendix F.
Recommended mean background level for U-nat is of 0.51 pCi/g, for Th-230 is 0.54 pCi/g, and
for Ra-226 is 0.34 pCi/g.
8.4.2 Gamma Action Level
Gamma surveys will be used to guide the soil remediation efforts. The surveys will identify soil
contamination that exceeds the cleanup criteria and will be used to guide the cleanup efforts.
After cleanup, the surveys will be used, in conjunction with surface soil sample analyses, to verify
cleanup to the site cleanup criteria. A gamma action level, defined as a gamma count-rate level
corresponding to the soil cleanup criterion, is used in the interpretation of the data. Normally the
action level is conservatively developed to allow only a five percent error rate of exceeding the
cleanup criteria at the 95% confidence level.
Conditions are not suitable at this time to develop an action level since the ore storage area
contains ore piles and the most of the areas potentially contaminated by process solutions are in
8-9
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Section 8 12-05.doc
December 2005
gamma shine areas. Therefore an action level will be determined after most of the contaminated
material has been removed. An action level will be established by developing a correlation
between Ra-226 concentrations and gamma-ray count rate using the appropriate statistical
approach to estimate the 95% confidence level. The action level will correspond to a gamma-ray
count rate that conservatively predicts that the Ra-226 in soil may be above the cleanup criterion.
One action level will be required for use where process materials or uranium ore is the principal
contaminant. Another action level will be required for areas affected by uranium tailings. These
action levels are expected to be similar but will be checked for accuracy during the excavation of
material.
Twenty or more locations within the contaminated area will be chosen where the Ra-226
concentrations do not exceed 25 pCi/g. Measurements will be made in locations where the
gamma-ray levels are uniform. A 2-inch by 2-inch NaI detector will be placed at the normal
monitoring height above the point and a count-rate determination made. A 5-point composite soil
sample will be taken within a 3-ft diameter area to represent the average concentration within the
circular area. The detector height of 45 cm will be used since at this height, a majority of the
above-background counts should arise from gamma-rays originating from the 3-ft diameter area.
This method of determining the action level has been shown to be equivalent to averaging the
gamma count rate over a larger area (100 m2) and performing a five point sampling of the grid
blocks, (Pathfinder Mines Corporation, Site Cleanup and Verification Plan for the Shirley Basin
Mill Site). Correlations developed using smaller areas are necessary when there are no large
uniformly contaminated areas. The gamma-ray count rates per pCi/g in the soil are, however,
theoretically slightly smaller, resulting in a more conservative gamma-ray action level. The
gamma action level(s) will be developed as soon as practical after the decision is made to proceed
to reclamate and will be provided to the State of Utah at that time. The data and correlation(s)
will also be included in the Completion Report. A correlation between gamma count rate and Ra-
226 activity will also be developed using the final verification sampling results for the grid blocks.
This correlation should confirm that the gamma action level was appropriate and resulted in
compliance with the cleanup criteria. The final sampling and this correlation will be done while
excavation equipment is still available on site. Correlation and sampling data will be supplied to
the regulator as soon as practicable. The final correlation will also be presented in the Completion
Report.
8.4.3 Gamma Surveys for Characterization and Verification
Two methods are proposed for conducting site gamma surveys, the first is the use of the GPS-based
radiological survey system and the second is the use of the equivalent conventional method using a
Ludlum 2221 rate-meter/scaler and Model 44-10 detector. Since the methods differ only by data
recording and management, there are no apparent differences in the accuracy of the results. The
surveys are described and PRL will decide which method to employ.
Gamma Surveys and Mapping Using Global Positioning System
The GPS-based radiological survey will be done using equivalent equipment to that used in the
correlation studies. The gamma-mapping system consists of digital gamma-ray monitoring equipment
8-10
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Section 8 12-05.doc
December 2005
coupled to a Ludlum Model 44-10, a 2-inch by 2-inch NaI(Tl) detector. The digitized radiological
count rate data are recorded once every two seconds by transmission to a Trimble ProXR GPS
receiver (or equivalent), which automatically tags the data with the coordinates at the time the data
count rate is received. The ProXR, manufactured by Trimble Navigation, is state-of-the-art land
surveying equipment, employing the use of satellite global positioning system (GPS) technology. The
accuracy of the coordinates is better than one meter while collecting data. The data are collected in a
data logger and later downloaded into a computer. The data are then loaded into the ArcView GIS or
other software for mapping and developing isocontours.
A gamma survey will be done over the extent of the affected areas and buffer areas. Gamma count rate
isocontour lines at the action level will be used to define where remediation is required. After the
remediation, the area will be resurveyed and the new data added to the database. This iterative
procedure will be applied until all areas are determined to meet the action levels.
In the verification phase, the average count rate over each 100-m2 grid block is calculated by
downloading the data into a database management computer application. The data records within each
grid block are counted, averaged, and assessed as to whether the grid block meets verification criteria.
Function checks for the equipment will be performed at the beginning of each work shift using standard
operating procedures. In addition, standard operating procedures will be used for operating the GPS-
based radiological survey equipment as well as processing the data.
Radiological Surveys and Mapping Using Conventional Methods
Gamma surveys may be conducted using the same type of radiological survey equipment described
above, other than the data will be recorded manually and presented on maps with isocontours using
computer assisted means. Grid blocks of 33-ft by 33-ft (approximately 100 m2) will be established
over the affected area. In order to determine the average gamma count rate within a grid block, the
Ludlum Model 2221/Model 44-10 combination will be used to integrate the count rate while a
technician walks the area for one minute. Correlation studies at other mill sites have demonstrated that
this results in a good correlation with the Ra-226 in the soil.
8.4.4 Excavation Control Monitoring
Remediation of contaminated soils will be done by excavation. The purpose of excavation control
monitoring is to guide the removal of contaminated material to the point where it is highly probable
that an area meets the cleanup criteria. Monitoring equipment and action levels developed in the
calibration studies will be used for excavation control monitoring. A technician will monitor the soil
after the removal of layers of soil until the instrumentation shows that the levels are below the action
level. The detector is held close to the ground so that small “hot spots” will be identified and removed.
This will lead to each grid block having a uniformly contaminated surface soil layer. This reduces
sampling error and will provide additional assurance that the average measured concentration meets the
cleanup criterion. No documentation of the results is done since the verification data will serve to
demonstrate compliance with the cleanup standards. For large areas, a GPS based survey may be
performed periodically to predict the progress of the excavation.
8-11
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Section 8 12-05.doc
December 2005
For areas exhibiting contamination below the top six inches, excavation control monitoring will be
done using the same detector as used in the calibration study, considering the appropriate action level
and adjusting for geometry factors. The cleanup limit for deep excavations in tailings affected areas
where backfill is applied is 15 pCi/g above background for Ra-226. For ore or process material
contaminated areas, the subsurface criterion for Ra-226 is 13.2 pCi/g (or 27.3 pCi/g U-nat) developed
in the Benchmark Dose Assessment.
Excavation control for the Th-230 contaminated areas will be done using a gross alpha procedure. The
soil sample will be dried and pulverized and placed in a ZnS-coated container. The container will be
counted in a Lucas Cell Counter. The counter will be calibrated using soil samples collected from the
site and analyzed for Th-230 by a vendor laboratory using isotopic thorium procedure, EPA-970. The
measured gross-alpha MDA for this procedure is 14 pCi/g. All soils with elevated uranium or radium
concentrations will be removed by excavating soils with elevated gamma-ray emissions. Samples will
be taken throughout the area and the sample locations determined by GPS. Additional soil will be
removed from areas exceeding the cleanup criteria for Th-230. Standard Operating Procedure HP-24,
Soil Screening Method for Th-230 in Soil, provides details for this method. Samples will be taken
throughout the area based upon the concentration of Th-230 and physical spacing of the previous Th-
230 sampling. Should the physical terrain change (i.e. from flat to sloping), the frequency of sampling
will increase so as to predict the Th-230 activity more accurately.
8.4.5 Soil Cleanup Verification Survey and Sampling Plan
A final gamma survey of the affected area and buffer zone will be performed using the GPS-based
equipment or conventional equipment as described above. For the GPS-based survey, a minimum of
10 data records in each 100-m2 grid block will be used to obtain the average gamma count rate for the
affected areas of the site. For conventional surveys, a 1-minute integrated count while walking the area
will be used as the average count rate.
For all grid blocks where the average count rate (bare Ludlum 44-10 detector) exceeds the action level,
the grid blocks will either be cleaned to below the action level or the grid blocks will be sampled to
assure compliance with the cleanup criteria. The five-point soil sampling procedure is given in SOP
HP-22. The sample will be analyzed to assure that the Ra-226 and uranium concentration complies
with the cleanup criteria.
All verification samples will be analyzed by a vendor laboratory according to specified QA/QC
procedures. Standard Operating Procedures HP-21, HP-22 AND HP-23 include details of the
soil cleanup verification surveys and sampling plans for surface and subsurface contaminated
areas.
For the Th-230 contaminated area (Area F), all areas exhibiting elevated gamma levels will be
cleaned to near background levels. Soil samples will be taken from Area F and analyzed on-site
until evidence shows that the area meets the 42 pCi/g above background Th-230 limit.
Documentation of the sampling locations and the results will be included in the completion report.

8-12

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Section 8 12-05.doc
December 2005
The area will then be divided into 100 m2 (33-ft by 33-ft) grid blocks. Thirty percent of the grid
blocks will be randomly selected for sampling and analysis at the vendor laboratory for Ra-226
and Th-230. If all grid blocks do not meet the criterion, an additional 30 percent of the grid
blocks will be sampled and the process repeated until the sampled set meets the cleanup criterion.
The sampling method and quality assurance requirements specified in standard operating
procedures, HP-21, HP-22, HP-23,.and HP-24 will be applied to this area. PRL will submit field
control and verification data for Area F to the regulator before Area F is covered.

8.4.6 Laboratory Quality Assurance

All verification samples will be sent to Energy Laboratories, Inc. (ELI) for analysis for Ra-226.
For 90 percent of the samples, the entire sample will be transported to ELI. Ten percent of the
samples will be selected at random and split, one part going to ELI and the other part to another
vendor laboratory. The analytical methods that will be used for U-nat and Th-230 are EPA
Method 6020 and EPA Method 907, respectively.

The results from the two vendor laboratories will be evaluated by assuring that the error bars
overlap at the three standard deviation levels for all samples having measured Ra-226
concentrations greater than 1 pCi/g. That is, if the sample results for laboratories A and B are
reported as CA ± 3σA and CB ± 3 σB, where σ is the standard deviation, PRL will conduct an
investigation if the following condition is not met: ⎟CA - CB⎟ ≤ ⎟3σA + 3 σB⎟. The investigation
may include having one or both laboratories repeat their analysis. The reason for not including
the test for results less than 1 pCi/g is that the agreement at these low levels is normally not a
good indicator of laboratory quality. For small values, the large relative errors almost always
allow the above test to be met. It has been our experience that the above test is very difficult to
pass for a large set of samples and therefore we may expect sample results that never agree even
after the subsequent investigation and further analyses. We however should expect that no bias
exists between the two sets of vendor lab data. The bias will be determined by performing a linear
regression between the data pairs. Any bias should be less than the difference between the
cleanup limit and the highest value measured in the set of verification samples. Other statistical
tests may be performed such as those to identify data outliers prior to assessing the bias.

The widely differing results between laboratories can be explained by the fact that it is difficult to
estimate the error for the analysis of a particular sample. It has been our experience that
commercial laboratories report an underestimate of their errors, often indicating that the errors are
the counting statistical errors only. They ignore the larger, often unknown, other statistical and
systematic errors associated with the analysis. These include a systematic bias of up to five to ten
percent due to errors in the calibration standards, errors associated with determining the chemical
extraction yield for radiochemical analysis, and the potentially very large error associated with
taking an aliquot from the larger sample. In order to assess these errors accurately, it would be
necessary to perform analyses on several aliquots taken from the same large sample. This is
costly and almost never done. We therefore, as indicated above, expect several samples to not
meet the criterion for agreement even after the investigation has been completed. We believe that

8-13

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Section 8 12-05.doc
December 2005
the overall QA program will, however, provide confidence that the analyses are acceptable and
that the site meets the cleanup goals.

Should it be discovered that a bias exists between the two laboratories that would be expected to
result in the failure of grid blocks using the primary laboratory results, the failed grid blocks will
either be further decontaminated and sampled or a third laboratory will be used in order to better
understand the source of the bias.

PRL management will check all aspects of data collection and input to verify that procedures are
being followed. The collection and handling of samples from the mill decommissioning, soil
cleanup, ore pad cleanup, Area F cleanup, and other radiological cleanup areas will be reviewed
and approved by management. Laboratory results for these samples will be evaluated for
completeness and consistency. Other aspects of the reclamation including adherence to the SOPs
and adherence to the reclamation plan will be evaluated by PRL management on a daily basis.
The construction process will be monitored to confirm that appropriate physical and radiological
safety procedures are followed. Excavation processes will be monitored to ensure that
contaminated materials are not handled carelessly and that any spillage is collected and contained.
The conveyance of contaminated materials to the tailings area will be monitored to prevent
dispersal of these materials in the environment. Construction and sampling activities will be
documented and reviewed throughout the reclamation process.

8.5 Land Restoration

After the mill site, ore stockpile, and Th-230 contaminated areas have been verified as meeting the
cleanup criteria, a completion report will be prepared and submitted to the State of Utah for
approval. Upon approval, PRL will grade the area to prevent excessive erosion and to blend the
site with the natural topography, to the extent practical. Native site soils will be added where
practical to help establish natural vegetation. Some areas will only be graded for commercial use
while other areas having no commercial use will be seeded.

A mixture of 2 pounds each of rabbit brush, crested wheat, alkali salaton, four wing salt brush,
shad scale and Indian rice grass seed will be planted at a rate of 12 pounds per acre.

8.6 Quality Assurance and Quality Control

The Radiation Safety Officer is responsible for implementing the Quality Assurance and Quality
Program (QA/QC). He (or his designate) will periodically review the program. Items for review
include the performance of the personnel, the adequacy and completeness of the records, and the
maintenance of the radiological instrumentation.

The QA/QC for the radiological aspects of the decommissioning will be administered through use
of trained and qualified personnel, adequate and maintained equipment, documented procedures, a
good record keeping system, and internal checks and audits.

8-14

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Section 8 12-05.doc
December 2005
Radiation technicians will be qualified by the Radiation Safety Officer (or his designate) to
perform specific quality tasks. Quality tasks are those tasks where the quality of the work is
related to achieving the performance requirements of the project. This will be accomplished by
requiring the technician to demonstrate an understanding of the equipment and SOPs for the task.
A list of qualified technicians will be maintained for each quality task. Periodic reviews of each
technician’s performance will be made by the RSO (or his designate).

All monitoring equipment will have current calibrations. Functions checks will be done before
and after daily use.

Chain-of-custody forms will be used for all verification soil samples, which will be analyzed by an
off-site vendor laboratory. A fraction of these samples will be split and submitted to another
vendor laboratory for analysis. The details of the Laboratory Quality Assurance program are
given in Section 8.4.6.

APPENDIX J.2
DERIVATION OF SOIL CLEANUP CRITERIA
(HYDRO-ENGINEERING, 2005B)

APPENDIX E

DERIVATION OF SOIL CLEANUP CRITERIA
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005

E - i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page Number
E.0 Objective of Analysis.................................................................................................E-1
E.1 Exposure Assessment.................................................................................................E-1
E.1.1 Potential Receptors....................................................................................................E-1
E.1.2 Potential Exposure Pathways.....................................................................................E-2
E.1.3 RESRAD Modeling...................................................................................................E-2
E.1.4 Results........................................................................................................................E-6
E.2 Uncertainty.................................................................................................................E-6
E.3 References..................................................................................................................E-7

TABLES
E-1 RESRAD Site Parameters..........................................................................................E-4
E-2 RESRAD Receptor Parameters..................................................................................E-5

ATTACHMENTS

E-1 RESRAD Benchmark Dose Run ...............................................................................E-8
E-2 RESRAD Soil Contamination Run .........................................................................E-23

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
E - 1
Appendix E

Derivation of Soil Cleanup Criteria

E.0 Objective of Analysis

The NRC amended 10 CFR Part 40 on April 12, 1999 (FR/Vol. 64, No. 69, pp17506-
17509) to require uranium recovery licensees to consider radionuclides other than Ra-226
in soil cleanup criteria. The existing soil Ra-226 criterion in 10 CFR Part 40, Appendix
A, is used to derive a dose criterion (Benchmark Approach) for the cleanup of byproduct
material radionuclides, including Ra-226. The radionuclide-specific criteria are adjusted
so that the total dose resulting from the mixture of residual radionuclides will not exceed
the Benchmark Dose. The dose from radon is excluded from the benchmark calculation.
Other recommended guidance documents include NUREG-1620 and NUREG-1549.

For areas contaminated with uranium tailings, the cleanup limit for Ra-226 is 5 pCi/g
above background levels. Section 3 in the main text shows that there are no known areas
of windblown uranium tailings at the site nor are there evaporation pond areas where Th-
230 may be of concern. Areas contiguous to the tailings pile will be cleaned to the Ra-
226 criterion of 5 pCi/g above background, where necessary. In the mill area, small
process material contaminated areas have been identified, where process materials have a
radionuclide mix similar to uranium ore. The only area where significant quantities of
contaminants exist is the ore storage area, where ore is presently stored but will be
removed and placed in the tailings pile. Therefore, soil cleanup criteria for a radionuclide
mix similar to uranium ore has been developed using the Benchmark Approach. It has
been assumed that all radionuclides in the U-238 and U-235 decay series are in secular
equilibrium.

E.1 Exposure Assessment

The exposure assessment is an evaluation of who may be exposed to constituents at the
site, how they would be exposed, and how much exposure could occur. The first step for
accomplishing this is to identify critical groups who may be potentially exposed. The
second step is to develop a conceptual model and associated exposure pathways. The
conceptual model includes the source term, mechanism for release, transport medium,
and an exposure route. The Benchmark exposure assessment is done for the site where it
is assumed that Ra-226 exists in the top 15-cm layer of soil at a concentration of 5 pCi/g
above background.

E.1.1 Potential Receptors

The Bureau of Land Management owns the land contiguous to the site. After mill
decommissioning and transfer of the small tailing and rubble disposal cell to the U. S.
government, the decontaminated structures will be sold for industrial and/or commercial
use. The only parcel of land that a “resident farmer” might purchase is the parcel now
called the ore storage area. The ore affected portion of the area is estimated to be
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
E - 2
approximately 4.5 acres. This receptor scenario is, however, unlikely since most people
would choose to live near Ticaboo (3.5 miles away) where electricity is available.

E.1.2 Potential Exposure Pathways

The summers are hot with highs above 100 degrees Fahrenheit. The winters are harsh,
with temperatures reaching near zero degrees Fahrenheit. The growing season is quite
variable and normally short. The annual precipitation is approximately 17 cm (7 inches).

There is no electrical supply and probably will not be in the near future. There is
adequate potable water in the aquifer, approximately 55 meters below surface, for
drinking and irrigation water. Vegetation in the area is exclusively native, uncultivated,
and generally sparse. The soils are weathered sandstone and would require extensive soil
amendments prior to gardening. The extremely hot summers and the poor soil conditions
make the growing of grain crops nearly impossible. Vegetable gardening is done in the
spring and fall seasons. However, this is normally limited to a few plants suitable for
short growing seasons. Fruit-tree blossoms are subject to frequent frost damage and are
considered an unreliable crop, possibly bearing fruit only one year out of ten.

All poultry and beef feed would have to be imported at a very high cost, making it very
expensive to have chickens and dairy and beef cattle.
There are no streams or surface water impoundments that would provide an exposure
pathway to waterfowl or other aquatic life. Beef animals may graze on the natural
grasses. However, an insignificantly small percentage of the annual diet would come
from the sparsely vegetated contaminated area. Therefore radiation exposure to animals
and aquatic life or indirect exposure to man via radionuclide uptake in beef or other
animals is not considered in this analysis.

In summary, exposure pathways for potential future residents include external radiation,
incidental soil ingestion, direct soil ingestion, dust inhalation, and ingestion of
contaminated fruit, vegetables, and drinking water. The radon exposure pathway is
excluded from the Benchmark Dose modeling approach per guidance from the NRC.

E.1.3 RESRAD Modeling

Exposure was quantified using the RESRAD program, version 6.2 (ANL, 2001).
RESRAD is a computer code developed at Argonne National Laboratory for the U. S.
Department of Energy and the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to calculate
compliance with soil cleanup dose guidelines. For this application, the soil guideline for
site constituents is the dose limit corresponding to the dose that a member of the critical
group (user of the site) would receive if contamination levels were at the 10 CFR Part 40,
Appendix A limit for Ra-226 in soil. This Benchmark Dose approach requires that this
be calculated for Ra-226 over the time interval of 1000 years. Radon is to be excluded
from the calculations. Using the same exposure pathway assumptions, the doses from
other constituents at the site are then calculated and compared to the Benchmark Dose.
The concentrations of each constituent are adjusted to correspond to the Benchmark
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
E - 3
Dose. The cleanup criteria for each 100-m2 area of the site will be determined by
limiting the sum of the doses from all constituents to the Benchmark Dose. The NRC
provides additional guidance for situations where the Benchmark Dose exceeds 100
mrem/y. The NRC also expects that the licensee reduce the concentrations to as low as
reasonably achievable (ALARA) levels.

Part 40 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Appendix A, limits the Ra-226 to
soil layers deeper than 15 cm to 15 pCi/g. This limit normally applies when backfill is
applied. Pathway exposure modeling is difficult for these site specific situations and,
therefore, modeling was not done. Consistent with 10 CFR 40, Appendix A it is assumed
that the dose is expected to be a factor of three higher from the surface contaminated
layer than from buried contaminated soil layers. With this assumption, it will be
conservative to scale the Benchmark Dose for Ra-226 and the other constituents by a
factor of three and derive cleanup criteria for buried contamination.

As is demonstrated in the main text of this report, the only radionuclides of concern are
natural uranium (with daughters). For modeling purposes, we have assumed that the top
15-cm layer is uniformly contaminated and that there is no residual contamination
beneath this layer. In our experience at other sites, this is a good assumption for
undisturbed surface soils.

RESRAD runs were made for Ra-226 and natural uranium ore. They are attached at the
end of this section. Parameters used in the calculations are given along with RESRAD
default parameters. The default parameters tend to overestimate the dose but are used
when site data are not available. Discussions supporting the use of some of the more
important parameters follow. Tables E-1 and E-2 present the parameter values along
with the rationale.

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
E - 4
Table E-1 RESRAD Site Parameters
Units Value Rationale
Area of Contaminated Zone m²18,000 Approximate size of current contaminated area (305 m x 58 m).
Thickness of Contaminated Zone m 0.15 Approximate thickness of contaminated soil that will remain after
remediation.
Length of Contaminated Zone Parallel to Aquifer Flow m 305 Length of major side of rectangular area of contamination .
Cover Depth m 0 No cover is planned as part of this removal action.
Soil Density g/cm3 1.84 Site Specific Parameter
Erosion Rate m/y 0.001 Default value for RESRAD model.
Total Porosity dimensionless 0.40 Site Specific Parameter
Effective Porosity dimensionless 0.1 Site Specific Parameter
Field Capacity dimensionless 0.06 Site Specific Parameter
Hydraulic Conductivity m/y 22 Site Specific Parameter
b Parameter dimensionless 1 (NRC, 1999) Table 6.45 value for sand
Evaportranspiration Coefficient dimensionless 0.5 RESRAD default value
Wind Speed m/s 2.6 NUREG-0583, 7/77-1/78, site specific
Precipitation m/y 0.18 Site Specific Parameter
Runoff Coefficient dimensionless 0.2 RESRAD default value
Watershed Area for Nearby Stream or Pond m²0.1 Stream/pond nearly impossible.
Unsaturated Zone Thickness m 55 Site Specific Parameter
Soil Density g/cm³1.84 Site Specific Parameter
Total Soil Porosity dimensionless 0.4 Site Specific Parameter
Effective Porosity dimensionless 0.1 Site Specific Parameter
Field Capacity dimensionless 0.06 Site Specific Parameter
Hydraulic Conductivity m/y 22 Site Specific Parameter
b Parameter dimensionless 1 (NRC, 1999) Table 6.45 value for sand
Soil Density g/cm³1.84 Site Specific Parameter
Total Soil Porosity dimensionless 0.27 Site Specific Parameter
Effective Porosity dimensionless 0.1 Site Specific Parameter
Field Capacity dimensionless 0.06 Site Specific Parameter
Hydraulic Conductivity m/y 22 Site Specific Parameter
b Parameter dimensionless 1 (NRC, 1999) Table 6.45 value for sand
Hydraulic Gradient dimensionless 0.02 RESRAD default value
Water Table Drop Rate m/y 0.001 RESRAD default value
Well Pump Intake Depth m 65 Site Specific Parameter
Well Pumping Rate m3/year 250 RESRAD default value
Indoor Dust Filtration Factor dimensionless 0.4 RESRAD default value
Shielding Factor, External Gamma dimensionless 0.5
Estimate of the shielding factor for a frame house built on a 3.5-inch thick
slab (NRC, 1999).
Shape of Contaminated Zone rectangle 305 m by 58 m Approximate shape of contaminated zone-rectangular.
Mass Loading for Foliar Deposition g/m3 0.001 desert environment (NRC,1999 Table 6.47)
Depth of Soil Mixing Layer m 0.15 RESRAD default value
Depth of Roots m 0.9 RESRAD default value
Irrigation Fraction from Groundwater dimensionless 1 Worst-case assumption.
Fruits and Non-Leafy Vegetables days 14 RESRAD default value
Leafy Vegetables days 1 RESRAD default value
Well Water days 1 RESRAD default value
Wet Weight Crop Yield for Non-Leafy Vegetables kg/m 0.7 RESRAD default value
Wet Weight Crop Yield for Leafy Vegetables kg/m 1.5 RESRAD default value
Growing Season for Non-Leafy Vegetables years 0.17 RESRAD default value
Growing Season for Leafy Vegetables years 0.25 RESRAD default value
Translocation Factor for Non-Leafy Vegetables dimensionless 0.1 RESRAD default value
Translocation Factor for Leafy Vegetables dimensionless 1 RESRAD default value
Dry Foliar Interception Fraction for Non-Leafy Vegetables dimensionless 0.25 RESRAD default value
Dry Foliar Interception Fraction for Leafy Vegetables dimensionless 0.25 RESRAD default value
Wet Foliar Interception Fraction for Non-Leafy Vegetables dimensionless 0.25 RESRAD default value
Wet Foliar Interception Fraction for Leafy Vegetables dimensionless 0.25 RESRAD default value
Additional Plant and Fodder Factors
Storage Times of Contaminated Foodstuffs
Saturated Zone Parameters
Occupancy, Inhalation, and External Gamma Data
Cover and Contaminated Zone Hydrological Data
Uncontaminated Unsaturated Zone Parameters
Parameter
Contaminated Zone Parameters
Weathering Removal Constant for Vegetation days 20 RESRAD default value
Building Foundation Thickness m 0.15 Typical foundation thickness for buildings (6 inches).
Building Foundation Bulk Density g/cm³2.4 RESRAD default value
Building Foundation Total Porosity dimensionless 0.1 RESRAD default value
Building Foundation Volumetric Water Content dimensionless 0.03 RESRAD default value
Building Foundation Radon Diffusion Coefficient m²/s 3x10-7 RESRAD default value
Contaminated Zone Radon Diffusion Coefficient m²/s 2x10-6 RESRAD default value
Radon Vertical Dimension of Mixing m 2 RESRAD default value
Building Air Exchange Rate 1/hour 0.5 RESRAD default value
Building Room Height m 2.5 RESRAD default value
Building Indoor Area Factor dimensionless 0 RESRAD default value
Foundation Depth Below Ground Surface m -0.15 Assumes slab-on-grade construction with a six-inch thick slab.
Rn-222 Emanation Coefficient dimensionless 0.25 RESRAD default value
Rn-220 Emanation Coefficient dimensionless 0.15 RESRAD default value
Radon Data
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
E - 5

Residency Time
Permanent residents have been chosen as the critical population group. It is assumed that
the maximum exposed individual spends 30 years living at the site, spending fifty percent
of the time indoors, 25 percent outdoors, and 25 percent elsewhere. It is unlikely that
families with children would live in the area since the nearest school is in Hanksville,
approximately 60 miles from the site. Therefore, a 30-year exposure time is reasonable.

Food and Water: It is assumed that a well is placed at the down gradient of the site in the
center of the contaminated area and that the resident obtains all drinking water from that
source. The well is used for irrigation where the resident grows 25 percent of their
vegetables and fruit on site. RESRAD default values for food intake were used. We
have assumed no intake of contaminated food through milk, meat, or via aquatic
pathway.

Area of contaminated zone: The largest contaminated area is the ore storage area which
has an affected area of approximately 17,690 m2 (4.4 acres). This is also the only
contaminated area suitable for a resident farmer. The contaminated area is approximated
by a 305-m by 58-m rectangular area. The receptor was located at the geometrical center
of this area for the RESRAD calculations.

Table E-2 RESRAD Receptor Parameters
Units
On-Site
Resident Rationale
Irrigation Rate m/y 0.9 (NRC, 1999) Table 6.18
Irrigation Mode -overhead
Inhalation rate m³/y 8,400 RESRAD default value
Mass Loading for Inhalation g/m³0.001 NRC, 1999 Table 6.47
Exposure Duration y 30 RESRAD default value
Indoor Time Fraction dimensionless 0.5 RESRAD default value
Outdoor Time Fraction dimensionless 0.25 RESRAD default value
Fruit, Vegetable, and Grain Consumption kg/y 160 RESRAD default value
Leafy Vegetable Consumption kg/y 14 RESRAD default value
Soil Ingestion g/y 36.5 RESRAD default value
Drinking Water Intake l/y 510 RESRAD default value
Contaminated Fraction of Drinking Water dimensionless 1 Worst case
Contaminated Fraction of Irrigation Water dimensionless 1 Worst case
Contaminated Fraction of Plant Food dimensionless 0.25 Site Specific Parameter
Mass Loading for Floiar Deposition g/m³0.001 NRC, 1999 Table 6.47
Occupancy, Inhalation, and External Gamma Data
Ingestion Pathway, Dietary Data
Parameter
Cover and Contaminated Zone Hydrological Data
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
E - 6
Length parallel to aquifer flow: The code assumes that the well is placed in the middle of
the contaminated zone. We have conservatively assumed the area is rectangular (305 m
by 58 m), with the aquifer flow parallel to the 305-m dimension.

Average Annual Wind Speed: Prevailing wind directions and monthly mean wind
velocities were measured at the site from August 1977 through July 1978 as reported in
NUREG-0583. The average wind speed from these data was calculated to be 2.6 m/s.

Average precipitation: The average annual precipitation rate for the area is 18 cm (7.3
inches), based on one year of site data (NUREG, 0583).

Irrigation: It is conservatively estimated that for a short growing season in this climate,
approximately 90 cm (35.5 inches) of water will be required (NUREG/CR-5512, Vol. 3).

E.1.4 Results

A RESRAD run was made for the site assuming that the Ra-226 concentration in the
contaminated layer was 5 pCi/g. Pb-210, the only long-lived progeny, was also assumed
to be present at 3.5 pCi/g. This is consistent with a radon emanating fraction of 0.3. The
output shows that the maximum annual dose within the next 1,000 years occurs at t = 0
years and is projected to be 34 mrem. A second run was made with the contaminated
layer changed to 100 pCi/g U-nat (48.9 pCi/g for U-238 and U-234 and 2.2 pCi/g for U-
235). The progeny concentrations were assumed to be in equilibrium with the exception
of those below Rn-222, where the activity of Pb-210 was reduced by 30 percent to allow
for the diffusion of radon. No loss of Rn-219 was assumed for the U-235 decay chain
because of the very short half life of Rn-219. The computer outputs for both runs are
included at the end of this Appendix. The maximum annual dose from the 100 pCi/g U-
nat plus progeny run is 374 mrem/y. Using the Benchmark Approach, the cleanup limit
for U-nat is (100pCi/g) x (34/374) = 9.1 pCi/g or 13.4 mg/kg above natural background
concentrations.

E.2 Uncertainty

Calculations (see RESRAD output at the end of this section) show that approximately
ninety percent of the total effective dose equivalent (TEDE) results from direct radiation
while the majority of the remaining 10 percent comes from the food pathway. Changing
to less conservative parameters for the transport of contaminants does not result in the
contamination of the aquifer and therefore the water pathway is not of concern. The
TEDE primarily depends on the exposure time and the amount of home garden produce
consumed. The occupancy time of 50 percent indoors and 25 percent outdoors is the
RESRAD default value for the resident farmer and is considered conservative. Similarly,
the assumption that 25 percent of the fruit and vegetables come from the contaminated
parcel is also very conservative, considering the location. Therefore the results of the
calculations are considered very conservative. The maximum calculated TEDE would
result from spending an additional 25 percent of the time at the site and eating all fruit
and vegetables from the site. This would result in an increase of no more than 60 percent
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
E - 7
in the calculated TEDE. Therefore the uncertainty in the calculated TEDE is relatively
small.

E.3 References

ANL, 2001. C.Yu, A. J. Zielen, J.J.Cheng, D.J. LePoire, E. Gnanapragasam, S. Kamboj,
J. Arnish, A. Wallo III, W. S. Williams, and H. Peterson. User’s Manual for RESRAD
Version 6, Environmental Assessment Division, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, IL
60439.

NUREG-0583. Operation of Shootaring Canyon Uranium Project, Ltd. July 1979. U. S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D. C.

NUREG-1549. (draft) Decision Methods for Dose Assessment to Comply with
Radiological Criteria for License Termination. July 1998. Division of Regulatory
Applications, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, D. C. 20555.

NUREG-1620. Draft Standard Review Plan for the Review of a Reclamation Plan for
Mill Tailings Sites Under Title II of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act,
undated. Division of Waste Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and
Safeguards, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001.

NRC, 1999. NUREG/CR-5512, Vol. 3. Residual Radioactive Contamination From
Decommissioning. Parameter Analysis. Draft Report for Comment. October 1999. U.
S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, Washington,
DC 20555-0001

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix E.pdfDecember 2005
APPENDIX J.3
NATURAL BACKGROUND CONCENTRATIONS OF
RADIONUCLIDES IN SOIL
(HYDRO-ENGINEERING, 2005B)

APPENDIX F

NATURAL BACKGROUND CONCENTRATIONS
OF RADIONUCLIDES IN SOIL
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix F.docDecember 2005
F - i
APPENDIX F
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page Number
F.0 Introduction................................................................................................................F-1
F.1 Natural Background Sample Statistics ......................................................................F-3
F.2 Analysis of Distribution.............................................................................................F-3
F.3 Summary and Recommendation................................................................................F-7
F.4 References..................................................................................................................F-8

TABLES
F-1 Preoperational Background Sample Data..................................................................F-2
F-2 Descriptive and Ordinal Statistics..............................................................................F-3
F-3 A Priori Screening.....................................................................................................F-4
F-4 Percentage of Non-Detects ........................................................................................F-4
F-5 Coefficient of Variation Analysis..............................................................................F-5
F-6 Studentized Range Test Analysis...............................................................................F-5
F-7 Coefficient of Skewness Test.....................................................................................F-6
F-8 Shapiro-Wilk Test of Normality (n<50)....................................................................F-6
F-9 Geary's Test (n>50)....................................................................................................F-7
F-10 Filliben's Statistic.......................................................................................................F-7

FIGURES

F-1 U-nat Histogram.........................................................................................................F-9
F-2 Th-230 Histogram....................................................................................................F-10
F-3 Ra-226 Histogram....................................................................................................F-11
F-4 Log Transformed U-Nat Data Histogram................................................................F-12
F-5 Log Transformed Th-230 Data Histogram..............................................................F-13
F-6 Log Transformed Ra-226 Data Histogram..............................................................F-14

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix F.docDecember 2005
F - 1
Appendix F

Natural Background Concentrations of Radionuclides in Soil

F.0 Introduction

The natural background data are taken from the draft report, Preoperational Radiological
Environmental Monitoring Program – Interim Results 1979-1980, prepared by
Woodward-Clyde Consultants (PRL, 1980). A total of 62 samples were taken in and
around the mill site in May and August of 1979 (see Table F-1). The samples were
taken in a radial grid extending out from the center of the site. A background sample
location was defined as a 100-m2 area where ten 0.5 kg samples were taken to a depth of
5 cm. These ten samples were then composited into one single sample for that location,
split, with one half of the sample sent off to the lab for analysis and the other half stored
for possible future reference. Results for natural uranium (U-nat), Th-230, and Ra-226
are used in this analysis.

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix F.docDecember 2005
F - 2
Table F-1 Preoperational Background Sample Data
Conc.
(pCi/g)
Error.
(pCi/g)
Conc.
(pCi/g)
Error.
(pCi/g)
Conc.
(pCi/g)
Error.
(pCi/g)
1 0.320.120.450.210.180.05
2 0.31 0.03
3 0.18 0.03
4 0.360.100.660.410.230.07
5 0.26 0.03
6 0.21 0.02
7 0.60 0.04
8 0.35 0.03
9 0.16 0.02
10 0.37 0.15 0.47 0.21 0.18 0.05
11 0.23 0.03
12 0.10 0.02
13 0.15 0.04
14 0.23 0.04
15 0.18 0.03
16 0.15 0.02
17 0.16 0.02
18 0.23 0.03
19 0.25 0.03
20 0.69 0.04
21 0.40 0.04
22 0.43 0.04
23 0.30 0.03
24 0.18 0.03
25 0.74 0.54 0.94 0.79 0.00 0.02
26 0.24 0.15 0.15 0.08 0.07 0.02
27 0.48 0.04
28 0.19 0.02
29 0.18 0.02
30 0.48 0.34 0.29 0.17 0.33 0.10
31 0.10 0.03
32 1.23 0.05
33 0.16 0.03
34 0.17 0.03
35 0.57 0.04
36 0.99 0.06
37 0.36 0.04
38 1.37 0.72
39 0.51 0.04
40 0.40 0.04
41 0.22 0.03
42 0.20 0.03
43 0.16 0.02
44 0.59 0.11 0.48 0.20 0.31 0.09
45 0.48 0.04
46 0.36 0.04
47 0.21 0.03
48 0.54 0.04
49 0.46 0.04
50 0.38 0.03
51 0.26 0.03
52 0.56 0.19 1.30 0.80 0.27 0.08
53 0.27 0.04
54 1.46 0.39
55 0.21 0.02
56 0.13 0.02
AP-1 1.56 0.20 1.20 0.40 0.62 0.19
AP-2 0.41 0.14 0.28 0.14 0.22 0.07
AP-3 0.37 0.13 0.46 0.20 0.19 0.06
AP-4 0.35 0.09 0.37 0.18 0.19 0.06
C-10.310.090.300.150.190.06
C-20.420.150.250.150.200.06
Location
Ra-226U-nat Th-230
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix F.docDecember 2005
F - 3

F.1 Natural Background Sample Statistics

Both the descriptive statistics and ordinal statistics of the 62 background samples are
presented in Table F-2. Of the 62 samples, only 14 were analyzed for U-nat or Th-230.
The descriptive statistics show the number of samples in each data set, mean, and
standard deviation as well as variance and skewness. The ordinal statistics present the
range, maximum and minimum value, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, and 95th percentiles and
the interquartile range for the three data sets.

Table F-2 Descriptive and Ordinal Statistics
U-nat Th-230 Ra-226
Count (n) 14 14 62
Mean 0.51 0.54 0.34
Geometric Mean 0.45 0.45 0.25
95th Percentile C.I. 0.17 0.19 0.07
Standard Deviation 0.33 0.36 0.29
Variance 0.11 0.13 0.08
Skewness 2.83 1.26 2.46
Kurtosis 8.97 0.53 6.49
Mean + Std. Dev. 0.84 0.90 0.63
Minimum 0.24 0.15 0.00
Maximum 1.56 1.3 1.46
Range 1.32 1.15 1.46
10th Percentile 0.31 0.26 0.15
25th Percentile 0.35 0.29 0.18
50th Percentile (Median) 0.39 0.46 0.23
75th Percentile 0.54 0.62 0.40
90th Percentile 0.70 1.12 0.60
95st Percentile 1.07 1.24 0.97
Interquartile Range (IOR) 0.19 0.32 0.22

F.2 Analysis of Distribution

The distribution of measured values has been analyzed following the EPA recommended
procedure and, where appropriate, use of the EPA software, Data Quality Evaluation
Statistical Toolbox (DataQUEST) (EPA QA/G-9D). An a priori screening of the data
was performed to assure that no outliers were included in the analysis (see Table F-3).
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix F.docDecember 2005
F - 4
Any observation that is 4 or 5 times as large as the rest of the data is considered suspect
(EPA 1989). Conservatively for this test, outliers are defined as maximum values greater
than three times the next highest value. If a datum value fails the a priori test then it
must be removed from the data set and explained. No data values were found to be
outliers.

Table F-3 A Priori Screening
Parameter Maximum
Value
Next Maximum
Value
Multiplicative
Factor Results
U-Nat 1.56 0.74 2.1 Pass
Th-230 1.30 1.2 1.1 Pass
Ra-226 1.46 1.37 1.1 Pass

A Determination of Percent Non-detects Analysis was performed on the data. If the
percentage of non-detects was less than 15 percent, the non-detect was replaced by the
detection limit divided by two. If the percentage of non-detects was found to be greater
than 15 percent then the distribution was considered non-parametric and a distribution
was not performed (EPA 1989, 1992). As shown in Table F-4 there was not a
determination of non-parametric distribution.

Table F-4 Percentage of Non-Detects
Parameter Number of
Records
Number of
Non-Detects
Percentage of
Non-Detects Results
U-Nat 14 0 0.00 Pass
Th-230 14 0 0.00 Pass
Ra-226 62 1 0.02 Pass

Histograms were then prepared for the U-nat, Th-230, and Ra-226 data sets as shown in
Figures F-1, F-2, and F-3 and Figures F-4, F-5, and F-6 for the natural log (ln)–
transformed data. While the data are skewed to the high concentration end of the
distribution, it is not apparent from the histograms that the data are log-normally
distributed.

A series of tests was then conducted to ascertain whether the data follow a parametric
distribution. For these data sets, the parametric tests were restricted to testing for
normality using the log transformed and non-transformed raw data. Normally-distributed
data usually have a coefficient of variation of less than 1.0. The results, as shown in
Table F-5, indicate that normality cannot be ruled out for all constituents, using the raw
data and log-transformed data sets. The Coefficient of Variation was calculated using the
DataQUEST software.

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix F.doc December 2005
F - 5
Table F-5 Coefficient of Variation Analysis
Parameter Standard
Deviation Mean Coefficient
of Variation Results
U-Nat (raw data) 0.33 0.51 0.65 Pass
U-Nat (log transformed data) 0.46 -0.80 -0.57 Pass
Th-230 (raw data) 0.36 0.54 0.66 Pass
Th-230 (log transformed data) 0.62 -0.79 -0.78 Pass
Ra-226 (raw data) 0.29 0.34 0.85 Pass
Ra-226 (log transformed data) 0.75 -1.34 -0.56 Pass

Almost 100% for the area within a normal curve lies within +/- five standard deviations
from the mean. The Studentized Range Test for Normality was developed using this fact.
This test compares the range of the sample divided by the standard deviation (s) to a
critical value range. If the value is outside the range, the test fails. The results of this test
are given in Table F-6 where all data sets passed with the exception of the log-
transformed Ra-226 data set. Therefore the Ra-226 log transformed data may not be
described as lognormal. The other results indicate there is not enough evidence to reject
the assumption of normality with a 5 % significance level. The Studentized Range Test
was performed using the DataQUEST software.

Table F-6 Studentized Range Test Analysis
Critical Values Parameter Maximum Minimum W/S Results
U-Nat (raw data) 2.92 4.09 3.99 Pass
U-Nat (log transformed data) 2.92 4.09 4.05 Pass
Th-230 (raw data) 2.92 4.09 3.22 Pass
Th-230 (log transformed data) 2.92 4.09 3.50 Pass
Ra-226 (raw data) 3.98 5.53 5.09 Pass
Ra-226 (log transformed data) 3.98 5.53 6.30 Fail

It has been shown that a small degree of skewness (between –1 and +1) is not likely to
affect the results of statistical tests based on an assumption of normality. However, if the
coefficient of skewness is larger than 1 (in absolute value) and the sample size is small
(e.g. < 25), statistical research has shown that standard normal theory-based tests are
much less powerful than when the skewness is less than 1 (Gayen, 1949). Therefore, it is
considered a failure of the test for normality if the coefficient of skewness exceeds 1.
The results of the Coefficient of Skewness Test are shown in Table F-7. All tests failed
at a significance level of 5 percent with the exception of the log-transformed Th-230 and
Ra-226 data sets. Therefore the log-transformed Th-230 and Ra-226 data sets may be
described as lognormal.

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix F.docDecember 2005
F - 6
Table F-7 Coefficient of Skewness Test
Parameter
Coefficient
of
Skewness
Results
U-Nat (raw data) 2.5 Fail
U-Nat (log transformed data) 1.4 Fail
Th-230 (raw data) 1.1 Fail
Th-230 (log transformed data) 0.2 Pass
Ra-226 (raw data) 2.4 Fail
Ra-226 (log transformed data) -0.8 Pass

The Shapiro-Wilk Test of Normality is based on the premise that, if a data set is normally
distributed, the ordered values should be highly correlative with the corresponding
quantiles taken from a normal distribution (Shapiro-Wilk, 1965). In particular, the
Shapiro-Wilk Test of Normality gives substantial weight to the evidence of non-
normality in the tails of a distribution, where the robustness of statistical tests based on
the normality assumption is the most severely affected (EPA, 1992). It is applied to data
sets with fewer than 50 data points.

The Shapiro-Wilk test statistic will tend to be large (close to 1) when the data is normally
distributed. Only when the plotted data shows significant bends or curves will the test
statistic be small. The Shapiro-Wilk Test of Normality is considered to be one of the best
available tests of normality (Miller, 1986; Madansky, 1988). The results shown in Table
F-8 reject the assumption of normality at the 5% significance level for the raw and log-
transformed data sets for U-nat and the raw data set for Th-230. The Shapiro-Wilk Test
of Normality was performed using the DataQUEST software.

Table F-8 Shapiro-Wilk Test of Normality (n < 50)
Parameter
Shapiro-
Wilk Test
Statistic
Table
Value Results
U-Nat
(raw data) 0.649 0.874 Non-normality detected at 5.0 %
significance level
U-Nat
(log transformed data) 0.872 0.874 Non-lognormality detected at 5.0
% significance level
Th-230
(raw data) 0.834 0.874 Non-normality detected at 5.0 %
significance level
Th-230
(log transformed data) 0.956 0.874
Not enough evidence to reject the
assumption of lognormailty with
a 5.0% significance level

Geary’s normality test is another commonly used test for data sets having a minimum of
50 data points. The Ra-226 raw and log-transformed data sets showed non-normality at
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix F.docDecember 2005
F - 7
the 5% confidence limit as shown in Table F-9. The Geary’s Test was performed using
the DataQUEST software.

Table F-9 Geary's Test (n > 50)
Parameter
Geary's
Test
Statistic
Table
Value Results
Ra-226
(raw data) -4.722 1.645 Non-normality detected at 5.0 %
significance level
Ra-226
(log transformed data) -3.315 1.645 Non-lognormality detected at 5.0
% significance level

The Filliben’s Statistic is also considered a powerful tool for detecting non-normality.
When applied to the data sets, all but the log-transformed Th-230 data showed non-
normality at the 5% significance level as shown in Table F-10. The test could not reject
the assumption of normality for the log-transformed data at the 5% confidence level. The
Filliben’s Statistic was performed using the DataQUEST software.

Table F-10 Filliben's Statistic
Parameter
Filliben's
Test
Statistic
Table
Value Results
U-Nat
(raw data) 0.786 0.934 Non-normality detected at 5.0 %
significance level
U-Nat
(log transformed data) 0.922 0.934 Non-lognormality detected at 5.0
% significance level
Th-230
(raw data) 0.916 0.934 Non-normality detected at 5.0 %
significance level
Th-230
(log transformed data) 0.979 0.934
Not enough evidence to reject the
assumption of lognormailty with
a 5.0% significance level
Ra-226
(raw data) 0.838 0.981 Non-normality detected at 5.0 %
significance level
Ra-226
(log transformed data) 0.938 0.981 Non-lognormality detected at 5.0
% significance level

F.3 Summary and Recommendation

The analyses of distributions in Section F.2 indicate that the data are probably not
normally or log-normally distributed. Therefore the distribution is non-parametric. As
such, one cannot use a formula to develop a background value that corresponds to a
specified Type I and Type II error rate.

The raw data and statistical parameters have been given in Table F-2, along with the
calculated percentiles. The mean concentrations are on the low end of the range of
natural background concentrations found in the United States. The standard deviations of
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix F.docDecember 2005
F - 8
the data are also very small in absolute value. In fact, the standard deviations of the raw
data in the U-nat, Th-230, and Ra-226 data sets suggest that the analytical counting errors
are a significant fraction of the standard deviation. This presents a practical problem in
that the Type I error rate (false positives) may be unacceptably high due to laboratory
uncertainty if the cleanup limit is low.

Site background concentrations of 0.51, 0.54 and 0.34 pCi/g, respectively, are proposed
for U-nat, Th-230, and Ra-226. This roughly corresponds to the mean for each data set
and is consistent with the mean background concentrations within the United States.

F.4 References

EPA, 1989. Statistical Analysis of Ground-Water Monitoring Data at RCRA Facilities,
Interim Final Guidance, Office of Solid Waste, Waste Management Division, U.S. EPA,
Washington D.C.

EPA, 1992. Statistical Analysis of Ground-Water Monitoring Data at RCRA Facilities,
Addendum to Interim Final Guidance, Office of Solid Waste Permits and State Programs
Division, U.S. EPA, Washington D.C.

EPA QA/G-9D. Data Quality Evaluation Statistical Toolbox (DataQUEST) EPA QA/G-
9D QA 96 Version; U.S.EPA EPA/600/R-96/085, December 1997.

Gayen, 1949, The distribution of “Student’s” t in Random Samples of Any Size Drawn
from Non-Normal Universes, Biometrika, 36: 353-69.

Madansky, 1998, A., Prescriptions for working Statisticians. New York: Springer-
Verlag.

Miller, 1986, Beyond ANOVA, Basics of Applied Statistics. New York: John Wiley and
Sons.

PRL, 1980, Woodward-Clyde Consultants; Preoperational Radiological Environmental
Monitoring Program, Interim Results 1979-1980; Shootering Canyon Uranium Project
Garfield County, Utah; NRC Docket No. 40-8698.

Shapiro-Wilk, 1965. An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples).
Biometrika, 52: 591-611.
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix F.docDecember 2005
Fi
g
u
r
e

F
-
1

U
-
N
a
t

H
i
s
t
o
g
r
a
m
n=
1
4
00
0
0
0
10
3
00
1
00
024681012
Bi
n
s

(M
e
a
n

-

S
t
d
.

D
e
v
.
)
Frequency
µ
µ − σ
µ + 4σ
µ + 3σ
µ + 2σ
µ + σ
< µ − 5σ
µ − 5σ
µ − 4σ
µ − 3σ
µ − 2σ
µ + 5σ
> µ + 5σ
F - 9
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\APPEND F-FIGS.xlsDecember 2005
Fi
g
u
r
e

F
-
2

T
h
-
2
3
0

H
i
s
t
o
g
r
a
m
n=
1
4
00
0
0
1
9
1
2
1
00
0
012345678910
Bi
n
s

(M
e
a
n

-

S
t
d
.

D
e
v
.
)
Frequency
µ
µ − σ
µ + 4σ
µ + 3σ
µ + 2σ
µ + σ
< µ − 5σ
µ − 5σ
µ − 4σ
µ − 3σ
µ − 2σ
µ + 5σ
> µ + 5σ
F - 10
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\APPEND F-FIGS.xlsDecember 2005
Fi
g
u
r
e

F
-
3

R
a
-
2
2
6

H
i
s
t
o
g
r
a
m
n=
6
2
00
0
0
0
1
41
15
11
3
00
051015202530354045
Bi
n
s

(M
e
a
n

-

S
t
d
.

D
e
v
.
)
Frequency
µ
µ − σ
µ + 4σ
µ + 3σ
µ + 2σ
µ + σ
< µ − 5σ
µ − 5σ
µ − 4σ
µ − 3σ
µ − 2σ
µ + 5σ
> µ + 5σ
F - 11
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\APPEND F-FIGS.xlsDecember 2005
Fi
g
u
r
e

F
-
4

L
o
g

T
r
a
n
s
f
o
r
m
e
d

U
-
N
a
t

D
a
t
a

H
i
s
t
o
g
r
a
m
n=
1
4
00
0
0
1
8
3
11
00
0
0123456789
Bi
n
s

(M
e
a
n

-

S
t
d
.
D
e
v
.
)
Number of Samples In Bin
µ
µ − σ
µ + 4σ
µ + 3σ
µ + 2σ
µ + σ
< µ − 5σ
µ − 5σ
µ − 4σ
µ − 3σ
µ − 2σ
µ + 5σ
> µ + 5σ
F - 12
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\APPEND F-FIGS.xlsDecember 2005
Fi
g
u
r
e

F
-
5

L
o
g

T
r
a
n
s
f
o
r
m
e
d

T
h
-
2
3
0

D
a
t
a

H
i
s
t
o
g
r
a
m
n=
1
4
00
0
0
1
6
4
3
00
0
0
01234567
Bi
n
s

(M
e
a
n

-

S
t
d
.

D
e
v
.
)
Number of Samples In Bin
µ
µ − σ
µ + 4σ
µ + 3σ
µ + 2σ
µ + σ
< µ − 5σ
µ − 5σ
µ − 4σ
µ − 3σ
µ − 2σ
µ + 5σ
> µ + 5σ
F - 13
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\APPEND F-FIGS.xlsDecember 2005
Fi
g
u
r
e

F
-
6

L
o
g

T
r
a
n
s
f
o
r
m
e
d

R
a
-
2
2
6

D
a
t
a

H
i
s
t
o
g
r
a
m
n=
6
2
0
1
00
3
32
18
5
3
00
0
05101520253035
Bi
n
s

(M
e
a
n

-

S
t
d
.

D
e
v
.
)
Number of Samples In Bin
µ
µ − σ
µ + 4σ
µ + 3σ
µ + 2σ
µ + σ
< µ − 5σ
µ − 5σ
µ − 4σ
µ − 3σ
µ − 2σ
µ + 5σ
> µ + 5σ
F - 14
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\APPEND F-FIGS.xlsDecember 2005
APPENDIX J.4
DERIVATION OF SURFACE CONTAMINATION
LIMITS (HYDRO-ENGINEERING, 2005B)

APPENDIX G

DERIVATION OF SURFACE CONTAMINATION LIMITS
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005

G - i
APPENDIX G
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page Number
G.0 Introduction...............................................................................................................G-1
G.1 Current Contamination..............................................................................................G-1
G.2 Parameter Justification..............................................................................................G-1
G.3 Radionuclide Source Term .......................................................................................G-3
G.4 Results.......................................................................................................................G-5
G.5 Conservatism and ALARA.......................................................................................G-7
G.6 References.................................................................................................................G-7

TABLES
G-1 Parameter for the Industrial Use Scenario................................................................G-3
G-2 Alpha Emissions from the Parent Decay of Long-Lived Radionuclides
in Uranum Ore..........................................................................................................G-4
G-3 Surface Parent Activities of Long-Lived Radionuclides of Uranium Ore
that Result in a Gross Alpha Activity of 1,000 dpm/100 cm2 ..................................G-5
G-4 TEDE from Industrial Worker Exposure to Surface Contamination at
a Level of 1,000 dpm/100 cm2 ..................................................................................G-6

ATTACHMENTS
G-1 Yellowcake RESRAD-Build Run Room Size 3m x 3m x 3m..................................G-8
G-2 Yellowcake RESRAD-Build Run Room Size 3m x 3m x 15m..............................G-17
G-3 Yellowcake RESRAD-Build Run Room Size 10m x 10m x 5m............................G-26
G-4 Yellowcake RESRAD-Build Run Room Size 100m x 100m x 15m......................G-35
G-5 Uranium Ore RESRAD-Build Run Room Size 3m x 3m x 3m..............................G-44
G-6 Uranium Ore RESRAD-Build Run Room Size 3m x 3m 15m...............................G-53
G-7 Uranium Ore RESRAD-Build Run Room Size 10m x 10m x 5m..........................G-62
G-8 Uranium Ore RESRAD-Build Run Room Size 100m x 100m x 15m....................G-71

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005

G - 1
Appendix G
Derivation of Surface Contamination Limits

G.0 Introduction

RESRAD-Build 3.0 (ANL, 1994; NRC, 2000) was used to evaluate the dose to industrial
workers occupying the buildings on the site currently within the radiologically restricted
area. The future use for these buildings will likely be associated with the recreational
needs of the local area. Possibilities include boat maintenance, refurbishing, and storage.
The existing electrical power facilities could provide power to these buildings as well as
to the local community.

The most restrictive exposure scenario related to these buildings is for workers, such as
mechanics, hired to do boat service or repair. It is assumed the current offices within the
buildings will remain to serve as administrative and support facilities for the workers.

The principal constituents in the surface contamination should reflect the process stream.
The milling operations consist of the Ore Hopper and Conveyor Feed, SAG Mill, and
Solvent Extraction Areas, where the radionuclide mix should be similar to ore. The
radionuclide mix in the yellowcake drying and packaging area should consist of natural
uranium that has been purified within the last 30 years.

The approach used was to calculate the radiological dose to industrial workers, assuming
that the surface contamination was made up exclusively of one constituent. As will be
seen, the worst-case model assumed all of the contamination to be uranium. The total
gross surface contamination limit was then based on the presence of radionuclides that
would result in a maximum dose to the workers of 25 mrem/y. This value is conservative
compared to the Benchmark Approach and is consistent with 10 CFR Part 20, §20.1402.

G.1 Current Contamination

Low levels of surface contamination are known to exist generally throughout the
buildings. The levels are considered low and less extensive when compared to those of
uranium mills that were operated for long periods of time. Measured total gross alpha
levels up to 796 dpm/100 cm2 have been measured recently in the processing areas of the
plant. Prior surface contamination data show that individual removable fractions of
contamination are limited to approximately 8 percent of the total. Once the process
equipment is removed from the buildings, a thorough cleaning of the contaminated
building surface areas will be performed, rendering the surface cleanliness and
contamination levels comparable to and possibly below current levels.

G.2 Parameter Justification

The exposure pathways considered in the industrial occupancy scenario are external
exposure due to the source, inhalation of airborne radioactive material, and inadvertent
ingestion of radioactive material. The parameter analysis is based on guidance provided
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005

G - 2
in NUREG-5512 Volumes 1 and 3 (NRC, 1992, NRC, 1999) and NRC 2000. The
selected parameter values, along with default parameter values, are provided in Table G-
1. The bases for selecting parameter values are discussed below.

The default condition assumes that the maximum dose is received during the first year of
occupancy by assuming the removable fraction is linearly removed within 365 days. We
believe that this is reasonable but conservative for this situation since the levels of
removable contamination will decrease over time in some areas. A build-up of dirt,
grease, oil, paint, or other coverings may also occur which will reduce airborne
concentration levels. The occupancy time was assumed to be 250 days per year, 8 hours
per day over the 365-day exposure period. The fraction of the exposure period that a
worker spends indoors is then (250 * 8)/(365 * 24) = 0.228. The workers were assumed
to spend the entire work day in the contaminated area. A breathing rate of 18 m3/day was
used since it is representative of active workers.

Several room sizes and ceiling heights were evaluated. The calculated dose, however, is
not highly sensitive to the room size but is highly dependent on ceiling height. An
exchange rate of slightly less than 1 change per hour is normal for homes in the U.S.
Reported studies of homes show maximum air exchange rates for homes average slightly
less than one per hour and are typically less than 3 air exchanges per hour. (NRC, 2000).
Since the buildings are not built to have low air exchange rates, and it is probable that the
large doors would remain open during occupancy in reasonably warm weather, an air
exchange rate of 2 air exchanges per hour was used in the model.

The model provides for a plane source or volume source. The source selected for the
model was assumed to be a uniformly contaminated floor of size equal to the room size.
It is unlikely that the contaminated area is larger than the floor area. Should this not be
the case, the characterization surveys will reveal it and the calculated average limits will
be reduced by an appropriate area factor. The results will show that the airborne activity
is the predominant dose pathway to the occupants. It is probable that the resuspended
particulate will arise from the contaminated floor rather than the walls or ceiling. For
these reasons, it is believed that considering only the floor to be contaminated is a
reasonable approach for modeling the dose using RESRAD-Build. The receptor was
placed in the center of the floor and the total effective dose equivalent (TEDE) calculated
at a height of one meter above the floor.

The deposition velocity for indoor air has been shown to vary considerably. RESRAD-
Build assumes a loguniform probability distribution with a range from 2.7E-6 m/s to
2.7E-3 m/s. A sensitivity analysis shows that the TEDE varied less than three percent
with changes in this parameter. Therefore a conservative value of 0.01 m/s was selected.
Similarly, the results were influenced by less than three percent with changes in the
resuspension rate. RESRAD-Build assumes a loguniform probability distribution ranging
from 2.8E-10 s-1 to 1.4E-5 s-1. A value of 5E-7 s-1 was selected for this parameter.

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005

G - 3
Preliminary site characterization data indicate removable fractions of less than 8 percent.
Since an extensive survey and cleaning effort will occur prior to the release of the sites,
we believe that 20 percent is conservative for these buildings.

Table G-1 Parameter for the Industrial Use Scenario
RESRAD Building Parameter Selected Value
External dose rate factor from surfaces (mrem/h per dpm/100 cm2 FG Report No. 12
Inhalation CEDE factor (mrem/pCi inhaled) FG Report No. 11
Ingestion CEDE factor (mrem/pCi ingested) FG Report No. 11
Exposure period (days) 365
Fraction of time that exposure occurs during the exposure period
(called indoor fraction in RESRAD-Build) 0.228
Time fraction of receptor 1
Deposition velocity (m/s) 0.01
Resuspension rate (1/s) 5.0E-07
Volumetric breathing rate (m3/day) 18
Effective transfer rate for ingestion of removable contamination
from surfaces to hands, from hands to mouth (m2/h) 1.0E-04
Fraction of Removable Contamination 20%
Size of Room (m * m * m) 10 * 10 * 10
Loose Fraction Removal Time (days) 365
Air Exchange Rate (1/h) 2
Source Geometry (m * m * m) 10 * 10 * 0
Radon Release Fraction 0.3
Fraction of time at work subject to exposure 1
Direct Ingestion Rate 0

The radon release fraction is based on the emanating fraction for radon in mill tailings,
which typically ranges from 0.1-0.3. Since the contamination layer is very thin, we
believe that a larger fraction of the Rn-222 will be released. The radon release rate for
Rn-219 is probably closer to zero since the half life is less than 1 minute. However, the
low abundance of the U-235 decay chain makes the TEDE from the U-235 decay chain
negligible. We have therefore used 0.3 as the emanation fraction for radon.

G.3 Radionuclide Source Term

RESRAD-Build considers only the long-lived radionuclides (half lives longer than 0.5
years). For short-lived progeny, the code automatically includes the in-growth and
corresponding dose contributions with the parent. The two source terms of interest for
the buildings are yellowcake and ore (or process material). For ore (or process material)
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005

G - 4
the secular equilibrium was assumed down to radon. It was assumed that 30 percent of
the Rn-222 escaped from the solid matrix for ore. No release of the Rn-219 in the U-235
series was assumed since gaseous diffusion out of the matrix is unlikely because the half
life of Rn-219 is less than one second.

The natural activity abundance of natural uranium is 2.2 percent U-235, and 48.9 percent
each of U-238 and U-234. It is desirable to measure surface contamination for these
facilities as gross alpha/100 cm2. We therefore have derived surface activity limits by
first calculating, using RESRAD-Build, a TEDE corresponding to 1,000 dpm gross
alpha/100 cm2. For the yellowcake-contaminated areas the in-growth of alpha-emitting
progeny can be shown to be negligible, thus a gross alpha contamination level of 1,000
dpm/100 cm2 would result in contributions of 489 dpm/100 cm2, 489 dpm/100 cm2, and
22 dpm/100 cm2 from U-238, U-234, and U-235 respectively. These activities were used
as input into RESRAD-Build for yellowcake contamination.

The determination of the activities for the long-lived radionuclides in uranium ore is
more difficult as shown below. The alpha emitting radionuclides from uranium ore are
given in Table G-2 below. Only the radionuclides with half lives longer than 0.5 year are
considered. The alpha decays of each radionuclide and short-lived progeny are listed in
the second column of Table G-2. The value for Ra-226 was obtained by assuming that
70 percent of the Rn-222 remained in the solid matrix. Thus only 70 percent of the alpha
emissions from the Rn-222 and progeny (Po-218 and Po-214) will be observed.
Similarly, only 70 percent of the alpha particles from the Pb-210 progeny, Po-210, will
be observed.

Table G-2 Alpha Emissions from the Parent Decay of Long-Lived Radionuclides in
Uranium Ore
Decay
Chain Radionuclide Alpha emissions
per parent decay
U-238 1
U-234 1
Th-230 1
Ra-226 3.1 D23
8

Pb-210 0.7
U-235 1
Pa-231 1 D23
5

Ac-227 5

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005

G - 5
In order to calculate the activity concentrations of the radionuclides for input into the
RESRAD-Build code, we have used the following relationship:

D235 + D238 = 1000 dpm/100 cm2

Where: D235 and D238 are the emission rate of alphas from the U-235 and U-238 decay
chains per 100 cm2, respectively. Using data from Table G-2 and the natural activity
abundance ratio for U-235/U-238 (0.022/0.0489), the equation can be rewritten using the
following steps as:

(1) (D’235 * 7) + (D’238 * 6.8) = 1000
(2) D’235 = (0.022/0.489) * D’238
(3) [(0.022/0.489) * 7 * D’238] + (6.8 * D’238) = 1000 dpm/100 cm2

Where: D’235 is the disintegration rate of U-235 per 100 cm2 and D’238 is the
disintegration rate of U-238 per 100 cm2. Solving for D238 and using the natural
abundance ratios, D’238 = 140 dpm/100 cm2 and D’235 = 6.3 dpm/100 cm2.

The source term input for uranium ore is provided in Table G-3, using the calculated
activities for the parents of the decay chain, U-238 and U-235, and the assumed radon
release rates as discussed above.

Table G-3 Surface Parent Activities of Long-Lived Radionuclides of Uranium Ore
that Result in a Gross Alpha Activity of 1,000 dpm/100 cm2
Radionuclide Activity
(dpm/100 cm2)
U-238 140
U-234 140
Th-230 140
Ra-226 140
Pb-210 98
U-235 6.3
Pa-231 6.3
Ac-227 6.3

G.4 Results

RESRAD-Build was run for rooms of various sizes where the contaminants were either
yellowcake or residue having a radionuclide mix corresponding to uranium ore. In all
cases, only the floor was assumed to be contaminated at 1,000 dpm/100 cm2 (4.5E+4
pCi/m2). For uranium, the natural abundance ratio was assumed where the total activity
for uranium was divided into 48.9 percent each for U-238 and U-234 and 2.2 percent for
U-235. The results of the calculations are included in the RESRAD-Build reports
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005

G - 6
included at the end of this section as Attachment G-1 through G-8 and summarized in
Table G-4.

Table G-4 TEDE from Industrial Worker Exposure to Surface Contamination at a
Level of 1,000 dpm/100 cm2
Contaminant
Room Size
L x W x H
(m x m x m)
Total Effective Dose
Equivalent (TEDE)
(mrem)
Yellowcake 3 * 3 * 3 32.1
Yellowcake 3 * 3 * 15 6.43
Yellowcake 10 * 10 * 5 19.3
Yellowcake 100 * 100 * 15 6.44
Uranium Ore 3 * 3 * 3 35.3
Uranium Ore 3 * 3 * 15 7.11
Uranium Ore 10 * 10 * 5 21.3
Uranium Ore 100 * 100 * 15 7.3

The results show that the TEDE decreases as the volume of the room increases which is
to be expected since the room air exchange rate was held constant at 2 air exchanges per
hour. Currently, the mill building has very large rooms and a few small offices or rooms,
all having a height of approximately 15 m. Table G-4 shows that the TEDE for workers
in the large rooms (approximately 100 m * 100 m * 15 m) is almost identical to that for
workers in small rooms (3 m * 3 m * 15 m) as long as the ceiling height remains the
same. It is likely that work areas will be 10 m * 10 m in size or larger and the desirable
ceiling height of 15 m would be retained. If a false ceiling were added to allow for more
efficient air conditioning, a minimum ceiling height of 5 m would be expected. One or
more of the smaller rooms might be used as an office where occupancy is a consideration.
While the current height is approximately 15 m, the ceiling might be lowered to as low as
3 m. A floor covering would probably be added thus limiting the airborne radioactive
particulate. This suggests that the most conservative room model would be a room with
dimensions of 10 m * 10 m * 5 m high for industrial workers and 3 m * 3 m * 3 m for
clerical or management personnel. The results shown in Table G-4 show that the TEDE
remains constant as the area of room shrinks to the size of a small office (3 m * 3 m) and
depends primarily on the ceiling height. It also shows that the most limiting model (3 m
* 3 m * 3 m) results in a TEDE of approximately 35 mrem/y for a contamination level of
1,000 dpm/100 cm2, for either yellowcake contamination or uranium ore. Thus, an
average gross alpha surface contamination level of 1,000 dpm would expect to result in a
maximum TEDE of 35 mrem/y.

The RESRAD-Build output shows that more than 99 percent of the TEDE arises from the
inhalation pathway. Therefore the TEDE is proportional to the average contamination on
the floor. Multiplying the contamination level of 1,000 dpm/100 cm2 by 25 mrem/35
mrem, an average gross alpha surface contamination of 700 dpm/100 cm2 should limit the
TEDE to 25 mrem/y. The RESRAD-Build modeling assumed a removable fraction of
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005

G - 7
0.2, resulting in a removable limit of 140 dpm/100 cm2. Using the Benchmark Dose of
34 mrem/y, the limits could be significantly higher. However because of ALARA
considerations, it is proposed to use 700 and 140 dpm/100 cm2 for the total and
removable gross alpha limits, respectively.

G.5 Conservatism and ALARA

RESRAD-Build uses conservative dose conversation factors taken from Federal
Guidance Report No. 11 (EPA, 1998). There is no user option for changing these factors.
For uranium, the chemical form for inhalation is assumed by RESRAD-Build to be very
insoluble (Class Y) rather than the more soluble form (Class W) or the highly soluble
(Class D) chemical form. While no data are available for this site, it is probable that a
large percentage of the uranium is Class W and Class D, which would reduce the TEDE
significantly. Other parameters chosen conservatively include ceiling height, loose
fraction removal time, and building air exchange rate.

G.6 References

ANL, 1994. RESRAD-Build: A Computer Model for Analyzing the Radiological Doses
Resulting from the Remediation and Occupancy of Buildings Contaminated with
Radioactive Material. ANL/EAD/LD-3. Environmental Assessment Division, Argonne
National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, Illinois 60439.

EPA, 1988. Limiting Values of Radionuclide Intake and Air Concentration and Dose
Conversion Factors for Inhalation, Submersion, and Ingestion. Federal Guidance Report
No. 11. 1988. Office of Radiation Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, D.C. 20460

NRC, 1992. Residual Radioactive Contamination from Decommissioning. NUREG/CR-
5512 Vol. 1. 1992. U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555.

NRC, 1999. Residual Radioactive Contamination from Decommissioning. Parameter
Analysis. Draft Report for Comment. October 1999. U. S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

NRC, 2000. Development of Probabilistic RESRAD 6.0 and RESRAD-Build 3.0
Computer Codes. November 2000. Prepared by Argonne National Laboratory for U. S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix G.pdfDecember 2005
APPENDIX J.5
BUILDING CONTAMINATION SURVEY AND
SAMPLING PLAN (HYDRO-ENGINEERING, 2005B)

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\AppH-TOC.doc
December 2005
APPENDIX H

BUILDING CONTAMINATION SURVEY AND SAMPLING PLAN

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\AppH-TOC.doc
December 2005
H - i
APPENDIX H
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page Number
H.0 Introduction...............................................................................................................H-1
H.1 Area Classification and Survey Unit Sizes...............................................................H-1
H.2 Equipment.................................................................................................................H-3
H.3 Scanning Surveys and Decontamination ..................................................................H-4
H.3.1 Class 1 Areas.............................................................................................................H-4
H.3.2 Class 2 Areas.............................................................................................................H-5
H.3.3 Class 3 Areas.............................................................................................................H-6
H.4 Final Verification (Status) Survey............................................................................H-7
H.4.1 Class 1 Areas.............................................................................................................H-7
H.4.2 Class 2 and Class 3 Areas.........................................................................................H-8
H.5 Measurement and Grid Construction........................................................................H-8
H.6 Data Evaluation.........................................................................................................H-9
H.7 References.................................................................................................................H-9

TABLES
H-1 Survey Classification of Areas..................................................................................H-2
H-2 MDA for Measurement of Uranium Surface Contamination Using
a One-Minute Count .................................................................................................H-4

ATTACHMENTS
H-1 Detection Probabilities............................................................................................H-10

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix H .doc
December 2005
H - 1
Appendix H

Building Contamination Survey and Sampling Plan

H.0 Introduction

The procedures for conducting gross alpha surface contamination surveys follow
guidance prepared by the Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual
(MARSSIM) guidance (NUREG-1575). The instrumentation performance calculations
assume that all contamination is yellowcake. This is a conservative assumption since the
average energy of the alpha particles from yellowcake is less than for uranium ore. This
will be conservative since it will underestimate the efficiency of the detectors when ore is
present, thus increasing the estimated MDA, reducing the allowable scanning speed, and
overestimating the uranium ore contamination level.

At this time, it is believed that once the process equipment has been removed from the
buildings and the structure has been washed, the walls and ceilings will be
uncontaminated. At this time, PRL is not permitted to discharge water to the tailings
area and thus cannot wash the surfaces. The data in Section 3.3 indicate relatively low
levels of contamination in the mill building (excluding the yellowcake processing area)
which is consistent with a facility that has had limited use as a uranium mill.

The gross alpha contamination limit for the floors of structures was calculated to be 700
dpm/100 cm2. The walls and ceilings of the rooms were assumed to be uncontaminated.
If significant contamination is found on the walls and ceiling, the contamination limits
may have to be adjusted. The limit was found to be independent of the room. Since the
exposure pathway was almost exclusively due to inhalation (See Appendix G), there is no
maximum limit and thus no area factor.

It will be shown that as a part of ALARA, the scanning technique will have a high
probability of identifying all areas of contamination at, or above the DGCL. These areas
will be further decontaminated resulting in an average surface contamination for each
survey area that is significantly less than the DGCL. In MARSSIM terminology, the 700
dpm/100 cm2 gross alpha limit is the derived concentration guideline level (DCGL).

H.1 Area Classification and Survey Unit Sizes

For most of the structures within the radiological restricted area, the floors and walls up
to a height of 3 feet are made of concrete and classified as Class 1 or 2. The walls above
three feet high and ceiling are metal and normally classified as Class 2 or 3, depending on
site knowledge. Table H-1 provides a complete listing of the affected structures and the
classification.

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix H .doc
December 2005
H - 2
Table H-1. Survey Classification of Areas
Area/Location Classification Source
Office floor Class 3
Guard station floor Class 3
Scales Class 2 Ore
Scale house floor Class 2 Ore
Walls/ceiling Class 3
Sample preparation building floor/walls up 3' Class 2 Ore
Ore hopper/grizzly Class 2 Ore
Conveyor feeder Class 2 Ore
Conveyor belt line only belt Class 1 Ore
Structure Class 2 Ore
Temporary generators area Class 3
Pump/fire house floor Class 3
Main fresh water tanks Class 3
Acid tank Class 3
Diesel fuel tank Class 3
Power house control room floor Class 3
Power house gensets floor Class 3
Air compressors floor Class 3
Dry floor/ walls up 3' Class 2 Ore/Yellowcake
Switch gear room floor Class 3
SAG mill floor Class 1 Ore/Yellowcake
Walls up 3' Class 1 Ore/Yellowcake
Wall/ceiling Class 2 Ore/Yellowcake Process
Leach floor Class 1 Yellowcake
Walls up 3' Class 1 Yellowcake
Wall/ceiling Class 2 Yellowcake
Control room floor Class 1 Ore/Yellowcake
Walls up 3' Class 1 Ore/Yellowcake
Wall/ceiling Class 2 Ore/Yellowcake
Water tank outside near leach walls up 3' Class 2 Yellowcake
Mill offices floors Class 2 Ore/Yellowcake
Wall/ceiling Class 2 Ore/Yellowcake
Reagent room floor Class 2 Yellowcake
Wall/ceiling Class 2 Yellowcake Process
Solvent extraction floor Class 1 Mill process
Wall up 3' Class 1 Mill process
Wall/ceiling Class 2 Mill process
Yellowcake precip/drying area floor Class 1 Yellowcake
Walls up 10' Class 1 Yellowcake
Lab floor Class 2 Ore/Yellowcake
Walls up 3 ' Class 2 Ore/Yellowcake
Wall/ceilings Class 3 Ore/Yellowcake
Maintenance shop floor Class 2 Ore/Yellowcake
Wall/ceilings Class 3 Ore/Yellowcake
Warehouse floor Class 2 Ore/Yellowcake
Wall/ceilings Class 3 Ore/Yellowcake
Definitions:
Ore - Natural uranium ore mined from the ground with no enrichment and in natural equilibrium. For this table, it includes
Yellowcake - Uranium oxide or yellow cake is a liquid or solid in which the uranium has been concentrated and decay products
Class 1 - Direct contact with 11e(2) material, possibly above DCGL.
Class 2 - Indirect contact defined as possible transport of 11e(2) material to item in question and possibly some low level of
Class 3 - No contact with 11e(2) material and activity below DCGL or no activity.

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix H .doc
December 2005
H - 3
The size of the Class 1 area is limited to the area of the floor plus lower wall of each
room. MARSSIM suggests that Class 1 areas for structures be limited to 100 m2 unless
justified. For many of the buildings, the area associated with a classification will be
small and thus survey units will be on the order of 100 m2. This includes the Office,
Guard Station, Scale house, Sample Preparation Building, and Control Room. The Mill
Building, however, has rooms up to 10,000 m2 in size. Future use of this building is
expected to be by an industry desiring high ceilings (15 m) and large room sizes.
Therefore it is unlikely that partitions will be placed in the rooms and thus the TEDE to
occupants will be a function of average contamination on the floor and the ceiling height
(See Appendix G). It will be demonstrated that the proposed scanning method will be
able to identify very small areas contaminated at or above the DCGL. For Class 1 areas,
a 100 percent scan will be performed and areas approaching the DCGL will be further
decontaminated. This will assure that contamination within the entire Class 1 area is
uniformly low. We propose that the survey unit size within the mill building be limited
to 2,500 m2. We anticipate that this will still result in more than 100 sampling points for
the Class 1 areas in each of the large rooms within the mill building. For the Class 2
areas, approximately 10 percent of the area will be scanned using a biased sampling
approach. If contamination above the DCGL is found, the area will be reclassified as
Class 1. A sampling strategy similar to the Class 1 strategy will be used for the Class 2
areas in the buildings. This will result in additional samples taken in each room.
Therefore, the total number of sampling points will be excess of one hundred for each of
the large rooms.

H.2 Equipment

The gross alpha scanning surveys will be conducted on floor surfaces using a Ludlum
Model 239-1F Floor Monitor (or equivalent). The floor monitor has a Ludlum Model 43-
37 gas proportional detector with an active area of 582 cm2. The detector window active
area is 43.8-cm wide and 13.3-cm long. The alpha background for this detector is
typically less than 5 cpm. For difficult to access areas, smaller gas proportional counters
or alpha ZnS detectors will be used. The scanning speeds will be determined by detector
size, the measured background count rate, and the detector efficiency. MARSSIM
methods for calculating scanning speeds have been used.

Static measurements (measurements at a single point) will also be made using the floor
monitor or other gas proportional or ZnS detectors. The counting time will be adjusted to
assure a minimum detectable activity (MDA) of less than 25 percent of the DCGL of 700
dpm/cm2.

Detector efficiency measurements were made for the Model 43-90 and Model 43-37
detectors using an NIST-traceable depleted uranium source. While it is true that the
efficiency will be slightly higher for a natural uranium source due to the higher average
alpha energy, the use of the efficiency from depleted uranium is conservative and thus
should overestimate the level of contamination when surveying ore areas. The Model
43-90 had an alpha efficiency of 13 percent when the detector was in contact with the

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix H .doc
December 2005
H - 4
surface while only 5.5 percent when the detector was placed at 11 mm from the surface.
The Model 43-37 had an alpha efficiency of 9 percent at a height of 11 mm from the
surface. The Models 43-20 and 43-68 should have similar efficiencies as the Model 43-
37. The background count rates for the detectors were measured but may have to be
adjusted for specific site conditions. Estimates of the gross-alpha MDA for a one-minute
static count are provided in Table H-2 using Equation 6-7 from MARSSIM.

Table H-2. MDA for Measurement of Uranium Surface Contamination Using a
One-Minute Count
Manufacturer Model Background
(cpm)
Active Area
(cm2)
Alpha
Efficiency
MDA
(dpm/100 cm2)
Ludlum 43-37 4 582 0.09 26
Ludlum 43-20 2 181 0.09 59
Ludlum 43-68 1 126 0.09 67
Ludlum 43-90 1 126 0.055 111

The MDAs will be evaluated at the site and may be changed slightly when actual
background count rates for the facility are used. The counting times will be changed to
obtain an MDC of less than 25 percent of the DCGL (175 dpm/100 cm2) for gross alpha
measurements, based on the background count rate in the facility.

The critical level, Lc, is defined as the net response level, in counts, at which the detector
output can be considered above background. For this project, a 5 percent error rate has
been assumed for both the Type 1 and Type 2 errors where Equation 6-6 is used to
calculate both the critical levels and detection limit. For static one-minute counts, the
floor monitor has an Lc = 5 counts, the Ludlum 43-20 has an Lc = 3 counts, and the
Ludlum 43-90 and Ludlum 43-68 have an Lc = 2 counts. Therefore, any area where the
net counts (after subtracting background counts) exceed these levels is considered above
background. Again, this may change as the background changes at the facility.

H.3 Scanning Surveys and Decontamination

H.3.1 Class 1 Areas

A scanning survey will be conducted on all surfaces using a floor monitor. The detector
may be removed from the floor monitor and manually placed on wall surfaces. With a
low background count rate, the technician will consider stopping upon hearing a count to
determine whether the count was from contamination or a spurious background count.
The maximum scanning speed for an instrument was calculated using Equation 6-12 in
MARSSIM and the detector parameters noted above. The result shows that in order to
have a probability of at least 95 percent of observing at least one count while passing
over an area the size of the detector contaminated at 700 dpm/100 cm2, the scanning
speed has to be 27 cm/sec or less. This is a very fast scanning speed and shows that the

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix H .doc
December 2005
H - 5
instrumentation is adequate for the task. Application of equation 6-13 shows that if one
stops for a minimum of 0.4 seconds after hearing a count, there is a 90 percent probability
that an additional count will be observed within the 0.4 seconds, providing the area is
contaminated at the DCGL level of 700 dpm/100 cm2 level or higher. These and other
calculations using the formulae referenced above are shown in Attachment H-1.

A more practical approach is for the technician to stop after hearing 2 counts in 1 second.
Applying equation 6-14 shows that there is a 98.5 percent probability that 2 or more
counts will be registered in 1 second while traversing an area contaminated at the limit of
700 dpm/100 cm2. If the technician stops when he/she hears 2 counts within a 1 second
period and investigates further, the calculations indicate that areas greater than 0.18 m2
contaminated at or above the limit will be investigated. In order to arrive at that number,
since the detector is 43.8-cm wide and 13.3-cm long, the area covered in the 1 second at
the rate of 27 cm/sec will be equal to:

Area covered = (w * l) + (w * v * t)

Where: detector width = w = 43.8 cm, detector length = l = 13.3 cm, scanning speed = v =
27 cm/sec, and time = t = 1 seconds.

Area covered = (43.8 * 13.3) + (43.8 * 27 * 1) = 1765 cm2, or approximately 0.18 m2.

Areas identified as exceeding the 700 dpm/100 cm2 action level will be delineated and
investigated further by static-point measurements. Further attempts at decontamination
will be made to assure compliance with the ALARA goal of reducing the levels as low as
reasonably achievable.

The dose assessment (see Appendix G) was based on a floor area of 100 m2 with uniform
contamination. The dose calculations show that the principal dose pathway is via
inhalation of resuspended contaminated dust. The direct gamma exposure pathway was
not significant and therefore no “hot spot” criteria are proposed for these buildings.
However, the proposed scanning method should specifically identify all but a very
insignificant percentage of the 0.18-m2 areas having contamination above the criterion.
Larger areas contaminated at the DCGL will, with almost certainty, be detected and
decontaminated to ALARA levels. The ALARA efforts at reducing the contamination
levels in these special areas should result in an average contamination level that is
considerably less than the DCGL.

H.3.2 Class 2 Areas

A minimum of twenty-five percent of the Class 2 area will be scanned using the Ludlum
Model 43-37 detector (or equivalent) taken from the floor monitor at a speed of not more
than 27 cm/s. This includes 100 percent of floor areas. The performance criteria and
method of scanning will be the same as calculated for the Class 1 area presented above.

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix H .doc
December 2005
H - 6
Smaller detectors, coupled to a ratemeter/scaler may be used in small or difficult to
access areas. Applying Equations 6-12 and 6-13 to the Model 43-90 detector shows that
in order to have a 95 percent probability of detecting at least one count while passing
over an area the size of the detector contaminated at the 700 dpm/100 cm2 level, a
maximum scanning speed of 2 cm/sec should be used. If one stops for 3 seconds, there is
a 90 percent probability of at least one other count if the contamination limit of 700
dpm/100 cm2 is exceeded (from Equation 6-13).

Another option for scanning walls or hard to access areas is to use a smaller detector,
such as the Ludlum 43-20. This gas proportional detector is approximately 10.2-cm wide
and 17.8-cm long with an active area of 181 cm2. It is expected to have the same
efficiency (9 percent) for uranium alpha particles as the Ludlum 43-37 detector on the
floor monitor. The background would be expected to be 2 cpm. Applying Equations 6-
12, 6-13, and 6-14 from MARSSIM to the Model 43-20 detector shows that in order to
have a 95 percent probability of detecting at least one count while passing over an area
the size of the detector contaminated at the 700 dpm/100 cm2 level, a maximum scanning
speed of 6 cm/sec should be used. If one stops for 1.2 seconds, there is a 90 percent
probability of at least one other count. The calculations show that two or more counts
should be recorded within a time period of 2.5 seconds more than 95 percent of the time
while scanning an area at the DCGL of 700 dpm/1002. At a scanning speed of 6 cm/sec,
the corresponding area traversed, using the same equation used in Section H.3.1, in 2.5
seconds is (10.2 * 17.8) + (17.8 * 2.5 * 6) = 448 cm2. This would imply that smaller
spots contaminated at the DCGL would not be identified if the 2 counts/2.5 second
criteria were applied while scanning. The 2-count criterion using this detector is
considered acceptable since missing isolated “hot spots” will not result in a significant
TEDE to future occupants.

Should areas of contamination be found in Class 2 areas that exceed 700 dpm/100 cm2,
the area will be reclassified as Class 1 and Class 1 survey and verification procedures will
be followed.

H.3.3 Class 3 Areas

The floors of rooms or buildings classified as Class 3 will be scanned using the same
scanning technique as for Class 1 and Class 2. Biased static surface-contamination
measurements will be made near floor drains, horizontal ledges, and HVAC systems
using one of the detectors described in previous sections. Counting times will typically
be one minute but adjusted, if necessary, to assure an MDA of less than 25 percent of the
DCGL of 700 dpm/100 cm2. Biased static-point measurements will be made at a
minimum of 30 locations within each building. One or more measurements will be made
in all areas where site specific knowledge indicates a potential for contamination.
Potential sampling points include horizontal ledges, surfaces, and beams where dust may
have collected as well as in and around HVAC and other ducts.

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix H .doc
December 2005
H - 7
Measurements results from Class 3 areas that exceed 25 percent of the limit of 700
dpm/100 cm2 will indicate a need to reclassify at least a portion of the Class 3 area as
Class 2. A scan of at least 25 percent of this Class 2 area will be done according to Class
2 procedures.

H.4 Final Verification (Status) Survey

The MARSSIM guidance for developing a final status survey is based on the existing
data and professional judgment. The method recognizes that small changes may be
required as additional data are gathered.

H.4.1 Class 1 Areas

In order to determine that the Class 1 areas meet the DCGL, the areas will be divided into
survey units of 2500 m2 or less, using a grid system appropriate for each structure. The
purpose of the Final Verification Survey is to demonstrate that each survey unit meets the
cleanup criteria. In this case, the result of the dose modeling effort showed that a surface
contamination limit of 700 dpm/100 cm2, averaged over the entire area, would not result
in a TEDE of more than 25 mrem/y to the occupant.

Historical surface contamination data show that the background contamination levels are
a very small fraction of the DCGL value of 700 dpm/100 cm2 and thus the background
level may be ignored (assumed to be zero).

The null hypothesis, Ho, is that the survey unit exceeds the release criterion. Therefore it
will be necessary to demonstrate that the null hypothesis can be rejected prior to release
of the survey unit. A Type 1 decision error (α) would release the unit containing activity
that exceeds the limit. A Type 2 decision error (β) is to incorrectly accept the null
hypothesis, resulting in unnecessary work. For this project, we will accept 5 percent for
both α and β decision errors.

The next task is to calculate the relative shift parameter as defined in MARSSIM by the
equation:
(DCGL-LBGR)/σ

Where: DCGL is 700 dpm/100 cm2, the Lower Bound of the Gray Region (LBGR) is to
be defined, and σ is the standard deviation of the measurements.

In Section H.3, it was shown that the scanning capability of the proposed instrumentation
is very good and that significantly large hot spots will be identified and investigated
further. Where practical, these areas will be further cleaned to ALARA levels. Since all
Class 1 surfaces will be scanned, this reduces the probability that a significant fraction of
the survey unit will exceed the cleanup criterion. In addition, further cleaning will result
in reducing the levels and thus result in reducing the standard deviation of the
measurements in the final verification survey. It is reasonable to expect a standard

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix H .doc
December 2005
H - 8
deviation of 300dpm/100 cm2 for the verification data for each Class 1 survey unit.
Assuming a LBGR of 350dpm/100 cm2, the relative shift is 1.2. Substituting into the
equation 5-2 of MARSSIM, the number of fixed point measurements in each survey
area, N, is calculated to be

N = (Z1-α + Z1-β)2 / 4(Sign P - 0.5)2
= 18
Where: Z1-α = Z1-β = 1.645 from Table 5.2 and Sign P = 0.885 from Table 5.4

Using the equations in MARSSIM, the number of data points to demonstrate compliance
is calculated to be 18. Increasing this by 20 percent, as recommended, brings the total
measurements per survey area to 22.

H.4.2 Class 2 and Class 3 Areas

Class 2 and Class 3 areas are not anticipated to be contaminated and therefore the
contaminant distribution should be near background levels. We have assumed that the
background levels are insignificant and that the one-sample Sign test applies. It is
estimated that the standard deviation of the areas will be approximately 100 dpm/100 cm2
Assuming a LBER of 350 dpm/100 cm2 would still result in a relative shift of 3.5, where
the Sign P is equal to 1. Type 1 errors are not as significant in Class 2 and Class 3 areas
since the potential for exposure is much less from the lower walls and ceiling than for the
floor (The floors will be scanned). Therefore we have chosen α = 0.2. We have limited
Type 2 errors to 0.1 since this type of error would necessarily involve further unnecessary
remediation or further sampling. Type 2 errors set β = 0.1.

It is reasonable to expect a standard deviation of 100dpm/100 cm2 for these areas.
Assuming a LBGR of 350dpm/100 cm2, the relative shift is 3.5. Substituting into the
equation 5-2 of MARSSIM, the number of fixed point measurements in each survey
area, N, is calculated to be

N = (Z1-α + Z1-β)2 / 4(Sign P – 0.5)2
= 4.5
Where: Z1-α = 0.842 and Z1-β = 1.282 from Table 5.2 and Sign P = 1 from Table 5.4

Using the equations in MARSSIM, the number of data points to demonstrate compliance
is calculated to be 5. Increasing this by 20 percent, as recommended, brings the total
measurements per survey area to 6.

H.5 Measurement and Grid Construction

A grid will be established across all survey units according to guidance in MARSSIM.
Twenty-two static point measurements will be made in Class 1 survey units and 6
measurements will be made in Class 2 and Class 3 survey units. Data normally will be

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix H .doc
December 2005
H - 9
collected for one minute using standard operating procedures. A drawing of the grid and
sampling points will be prepared and documented.

H.6 Data Evaluation

With the assumption that the background can be ignored, the data are evaluated using the
MARSSIM guidance. If all values within a survey unit are below the criterion, the
survey unit passes. If individual values exceed the criterion, the Sign Test will be applied
to the data and the result used to determine whether the unit passes or fails.

H.7 References

NUREG-1575. Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual
(MARSSIM). Published jointly by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, U. S.
Environmental Protection Agency, U. S. Department of Energy, and the U. S.
Department of Defense. August, 2000.

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix H .doc
December 2005
H - 10
ATTACHMENT H-1

DETECTION PROBABILITIES

P1 GEd v Parameter
1.000 4074 0.09 13.3 10
0.983 4074 0.09 13.3 20
0.951 4074 0.09 13.3 27
0.934 4074 0.09 13.3 30
0.870 4074 0.09 13.3 40 G Contamination activity(dpm)
0.804 4074 0.09 13.3 50 E Detector efficiency (4π)
d Width of detector in direction of scan (cm)
v Scan speed (cm/s)
P2 GE t B t Time (sec)
0.985 4074 0.09 1 4 B Instrument background counts (cpm)
0.975 4074 0.09 0.9 4
0.958 4074 0.09 0.8 4
0.929 4074 0.09 0.7 4
0.884 4074 0.09 0.6 4
0.814 4074 0.09 0.5 4
P1 GEd v
0.998 882 0.055 7.5 1
0.952 882 0.055 7.5 2
0.868 882 0.055 7.5 3
0.780 882 0.055 7.5 4
0.703 882 0.055 7.5 5
P2 GE t B
0.990 882 0.055 8 1
0.979 882 0.055 7 1
0.958 882 0.055 6 1
0.917 882 0.055 5 1
0.841 882 0.055 4 1
P1 GEd v
0.998 1267 0.09 10.2 3
0.979 1267 0.09 10.2 5
0.960 1267 0.09 10.2 6
0.937 1267 0.09 10.2 7
0.911 1267 0.09 10.2 8
P2 GE t B
0.979 1267 0.09 3 2
0.954 1267 0.09 2.5 2
0.898 1267 0.09 2 2
0.786 1267 0.09 1.5 2
P1
Probability of observing a single count in time
interval t. MARSSIM Eq. 6-12
P2
Probability of observing two or more counts in
time interval t. MARSSIM Eq. 6-14
Lu
d
l
u
m

M
o
d
e
l

4
3
-
2
0
Probability of Detecting One Count at Scanning Speed v
Probability of Two Counts Detected in Time t
Probability of Detecting One Count at Scanning Speed v
Probability of Two Counts Detected in Time t
Probability of Two Counts Detected in Time t
Probability of Detecting One Count at Scanning Speed v
Attachment H-1. Detection Probabilities
Lu
d
l
u
m

M
o
d
e
l

4
3
-
3
7
Lu
d
l
u
m
M
o
d
e
l

4
3
-
9
0
H - 11
C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\AppH-Attach1.xlsDecember 2005
APPENDIX J.6
TITLES OF STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
(HYDRO-ENGINEERING, 2005B)

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix I.doc
December 2005
APPENDIX I

TITLES OF STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix I.Doc
December 2005
I-i
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Titles only does not include SOP Details

RADIATION SAFETY PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROCEDURES

Reference Appendix D of the Tailings Management Plan, 2005 Tables 5.5 – 7 and 5.5 – 8

EP-1 GROUND WATER SAMPLING

EP-2 NOT IN USE

EP-3 VEGETATION SAMPLING

EP-4 HIGH-VOLUME AIR SAMPLER CALIBRATION

EP-5 METEOROLOGICAL STATION CALIBRATION

EP-6 FIELD PROCEDURE FOR DETERMINING THE SIUTABILITY OF COARSE
ROCK MATERIAL FOR USE AS RIPRAP

EP-7 HIGH-VOLUME AIR SAMPLING

EP-8 SEEP WATER SAMPLING

TABLE OF CONTENTS

RADIATION SAFETY PROGRAM
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND FORMS

AP-1 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCIES

AP-2 SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PANEL

AP-3 FORMS, PROCEDURE MODIFICATION AND RECORD RETENTION
INDEX OF FORMS

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix I.Doc
December 2005
I-ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

RADIATION SAFETY PROGRAM
RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION PROCEEDURES

HP-1 PERSONNEL AIR SAMPLING

HP-2 OCCUPATIONAL AIR SAMPLING PROCEDURE
HP-3 RADIATION DOSE CALCULATIONS

HP-4 NOT IN USE

HP-5 RADON PROGENY SAMPLING

HP-6 INSPECTION OF THE MILL, TAILINGS DAM/AREA, AND ORE
STOCKPILES

HP-7 ALPHA PERSONNEL MONITORING

HP-8 DECONTAMINATION OF PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT

HP-9 RADIATION MONITORING OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS

HP-10 BIOASSAYS

HP-11 LOW-VOLUME AIR SAMPLER CALIBRATION

HP-12 RADIATION DETECTOR CALIBRATION

HP-13 CALIBRATION OF INSTRUMENT USED FOR CALIBRATION

HP-14 RADIATION WORK PROCEDURE

HP-15 GAMMA MONITORING

HP-16 RADIATION PROTECTION TRAINING

HP-17 AS LOW AS REASONABLY ACHIEVABLE

HP-18 RESPIRATORY PROTECTION

C:\Projects\2005-50\REC PLAN 12-05\Appendix I.Doc
December 2005
I-iii
HP-19 AUDITS AND TREND ANALYSES

HP-20 FENCE AND SIGN INSPECTION

HP-21 FUNCTION CHECK OF EQUIPMENT FOR RADIATION SURVEYS

HP-22 CLEANUP OF CONTAMINATED SURFACE SOILS

HP-23 CLEANUP OF SUBSURFACE SOILS

HP-24 SOIL SCREENING METHOD FOR TH-230 IN SOIL

APPENDIX K
DECOMMISSIONING AND RECLAMATION COST
ESTIMATE
Estimated Cost
Building/Structure Demolition
A) Truck Scale and Building $12,816
B) Ore Hopper and Feed Conveyor $67,885
C) Tankage and Miscellaneous Piping, Fixtures, and Small Structures $98,913
D) Mill Building $417,837
E) Warehouse/Shop $42,621
F) Lab Building $15,309
$655,381
Earthworks, Decontamination, Clean-up, and Revegetation
G) Removal of Ore Stockpiles $246,023
H) Decontamination of Ore Stockpile Pads $83,502
I) Equipment Containment Area Cleanup $22,758
J) Decontamination of Mill Yard $74,944
K) Regrading and Revegetation $75,040
L) Water Management Pond Removal $302,820
$805,087
Subtotal $1,460,468
Mill Site Demolition Materials
A) Mill Site Demolition/Decontamination Materials $459,248
$459,248
Borrow Excavation
B) Clay Borrow Excavation and Haul $1,169,093
C) Clay Borrow Haul Road Culvert Replacement $57,505
D) Sand Borrow Excavation $807,109
E) Pediment Borrow Excavation $864,658
F) Rock Borrow Excavation $1,252,263
$4,150,627
Regrading / Channel Construction
G) North Regrading (120,700 CY cut, 191,800 fill/regrading)* $1,701,896
H) Drainage Channel Construction, North Grading (19,000 CY cut, 53,000 CY rock fill)* $453,484
I) Drainage Channel Construction, South Grading (169,000 CY fill) $332,555
J) Tailings Cell Regrading $401,563
$2,889,498
Interim Cover Construction
K) Interim Sand Cover Material (97,000 CY)* $376,129
$376,129
Final Cover Construction
L) Additional Interim Sand Cover Material for Camber Adjustment (78,2000 CY)* $376,129
M) Clay Cover Material (65,000 CY)* $807,904
N) Final Sand Cover Material (64,000 CY)* $256,452
O) Pediment Soil Cover Material (274,300 CY)* $1,060,000
P) Rock Mulch Cover Placement (20,500 CY)* $83,181
Q) Rock Mulch and Riprap Production* $82,628
R) Windblown Contamination & General Regrading $706,775
$3,373,068
Subtotal $11,248,571
Management and Miscellaneous Subtotal $4,652,593
Total Direct Costs $17,361,631
Pre-bid/Bid-phase Engineering and Redesign 2.25%$390,637
Profit Allowance 10%$1,736,163
Contingency 25%$4,340,408
Licensing and Bonding 2%$347,233
Long Term Care Fund $1,222,858
TOTAL RECLAMATION $25,398,929
Mill Site Decommissioning
Tailings Reclamation
SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM MILL RECLAMATION COST ESTIMATE
March 2024
A)Truck Scale and Building Task Duration (days)2
1 Excavator w/ Shear & Operator (PC 300) 1 hrs $138.39 16 $2,214
2 Excavator w/ Thumb & Operator (Cat 325B L) 1 hrs $141.60 16 $2,266
3 Front-End Loader & Operator (Cat 980C) 1 hrs $124.03 16 $1,984
4 Front-End Loader & Operator(Cat 988B) 0 hrs $232.73 0 $0
5 35-ton Articulated Haul Truck 1 hrs $151.31 16 $2,421
6 6,000-gal Water Truck & Driver 1 hrs $100.74 16 $1,612
7 55-Ton Crane & Operator 0 hrs $301.87 0 $0
8 Towable Welder 1 hrs $11.17 16 $179
9 Demolition Mechanic/Welder 1 hrs $37.83 16 $605
# Laborer 2 hrs $27.63 32 $884
# Small Tools/Misc. Equipment & Expendables 4.5 hrs $9.04 72 $651
Task Subtotal $12,816
Description: Disassembly of scale building for disposal in tailings cell, and cleaning of the scale for release
RS Means Production Rates
Line Number Title Crew Unit Labor Hours Daily Output
24113304450 B11A CY 0.069 232 16.008
24116130500 B3 CF 0.003 14800 44.4
B)Ore Hopper and Feed Conveyor Task Duration (days)6
1 Excavator w/ Shear & Operator (PC 300) 1 hrs $138.39 48 $6,643
2 Excavator w/ Thumb & Operator (Cat 325B L) 1 hrs $141.60 48 $6,797
3 Front-End Loader & Operator (Cat 980C) 0 hrs $124.03 0 $0
4 Front-End Loader & Operator(Cat 988B) 1 hrs $232.73 48 $11,171
5 35-ton Articulated Haul Truck 2 hrs $151.31 96 $14,526
6 6,000-gal Water Truck & Driver 1 hrs $100.74 48 $4,835
7 55-Ton Crane & Operator 1 hrs $301.87 48 $14,490
8 Towable Welder 1 hrs $11.17 48 $536
9 Demolition Mechanic/Welder 2 hrs $37.83 96 $3,632
# Laborer 2 hrs $27.63 96 $2,653
# Small Tools/Misc. Equipment & Expendables 6 hrs $9.04 288 $2,603
Task Subtotal $67,885
Description: Remove grizzly and wet scrubber and place into the tailings impoundment. Requires disassembly and backfilling of ore dump pocket.
RS Means Production Rates
Line Number Title Crew Unit Labor Hours Daily Output
24116130500 B3 CF 0.003 14800
Minor site demolition, for disposal on site exludes
hauling, add
Building demolition, small buildings or single
buildings, steel, includes 20 mile haul, excludes
salvage, foundation demolition or dump fees
Building demolition, small buildings or single
buildings, steel, includes 20 mile haul, excludes
salvage, foundation demolition or dump fees
Unit Cost Total CostQuantity
MILL SITE DECOMMISIONING
Building/Structure Demolition
Equipment/Personnel Units Total
Units
Equipment/Personnel
Unit CostQuantity
Units
Total Cost
Total
Units
C)Tankage and Misc Piping, Fixtures*Task Duration (days)10
1 Excavator w/ Shear & Operator (PC 300) 1 hrs $138.39 80 $11,071
2 Excavator w/ Thumb & Operator (Cat 325B L) 1 hrs $141.60 80 $11,328
3 Front-End Loader & Operator (Cat 980C) 1 hrs $124.03 80 $9,922
4 Front-End Loader & Operator(Cat 988B) 1 hrs $232.73 80 $18,619
5 35-ton Articulated Haul Truck 2 hrs $151.31 160 $24,210
6 6,000-gal Water Truck & Driver 1 hrs $100.74 80 $8,059
7 55-Ton Crane & Operator 0 hrs $301.87 0 $0
8 Towable Welder 1 hrs $11.17 80 $893
9 Demolition Mechanic/Welder 2 hrs $37.83 160 $6,053
# Laborer 2 hrs $27.63 160 $4,421
# Small Tools/Misc. Equipment & Expendables 6 hrs $9.04 480 $4,338
Task Subtotal $98,913
*Includes:
Ammonia Tank
Acid Tank
Remainder of CCD (piping & fittings)
Tanks East of Mill Building
Sodium Chlorate Tank
Tailings Slurry Pipeline
Diesel Tank Foundations and Concrete Elements for above
Removal of fuel/chemical contaminated soils included under Task J of Mill Site Decommisioning
RS Means Production Rates
Line Number Title Crew Unit Labor Hours Daily Output
130505750620 B34P Ea. 12 2
24113232900 B6 L.F. 0.137 175
D)Mill Building Task Duration (days)30
1 Excavator w/ Shear & Operator (PC 300) 1 hrs $138.39 240 $33,213
2 Excavator w/ Thumb & Operator (Cat 325B L) 1 hrs $141.60 240 $33,984
3 Front-End Loader & Operator (Cat 980C) 1 hrs $124.03 240 $29,766
4 Front-End Loader & Operator(Cat 988B) 1 hrs $232.73 240 $55,856
5 35-ton Articulated Haul Truck 3 hrs $151.31 720 $108,943
6 6,000-gal Water Truck & Driver 1 hrs $100.74 240 $24,177
7 55-Ton Crane & Operator 1 hrs $301.87 240 $72,450
8 Towable Welder 1 hrs $11.17 240 $2,680
9 Demolition Mechanic/Welder 3 hrs $37.83 720 $27,237
# Laborer 2 hrs $27.63 480 $13,263
# Small Tools/Misc. Equipment & Expendables 7.5 hrs $9.04 1,800 $16,267
Task Subtotal $417,837
Description: Remove equipment for placement into the tailings impoundment.
RS Means Production Rates
Line Number Title Crew Unit Labor Hours Daily Output
24116130500 B3 CF 0.003 14800
Total
UnitsUnits Unit CostEquipment/Personnel Quantity Total Cost
Steel tank, double wall, above ground, 500 thru 2,000
gallon, selective demolition, excluding foundation,
pumps & piping
Pipe removal, sewer/water, no excavation, 12"
diameter
Equipment/Personnel Units Total
UnitsQuantity Unit Cost Total Cost
Building/Structure Demolition (con't)
Building demolition, small buildings or single
buildings, steel, includes 20 mile haul, excludes
salvage, foundation demolition or dump fees
MILL SITE DECOMMISIONING
Description: Remove and dispose of any fluids per state and federal laws. Clean tank and foundation for release. Vent tank, remove all present fittings,
and connect propane fittings.
Description: Remove and dispose of any fluids in tanks per state and federal laws. Remove and crush tanks and foundations for placement into the tailings
impoundment.
Description: Remove tanks and foundations for placement into the tailings impoundment. Remove and dispose of top 1 foot of soil beneath the foundation.
Description: Remove and dispose of any fluids in tanks per state and federal laws. Remove and crush tanks, sand filters and foundations for placement
into the tailings impoundment.
Description: Remove and dispose of any fluids in tanks per state and federal laws. Remove and crush tanks and foundations for placement into the tailings
impoundment.
Description: Remove and dispose of any fluids in tanks per state and federal laws. Remove and crush tanks and foundations for placement into the tailings
impoundment.
E)Warehouse/Shop Building Task Duration (days)5
1 Excavator w/ Shear & Operator (PC 300) 1 hrs $138.39 40 $5,535
2 Excavator w/ Thumb & Operator (Cat 325B L) 1 hrs $141.60 40 $5,664
3 Front-End Loader & Operator (Cat 980C) 0 hrs $124.03 0 $0
4 Front-End Loader & Operator(Cat 988B) 1 hrs $232.73 40 $9,309
5 35-ton Articulated Haul Truck 2 hrs $151.31 80 $12,105
6 6,000-gal Water Truck & Driver 1 hrs $100.74 40 $4,029
7 55-Ton Crane & Operator 0 hrs $301.87 0 $0
8 Towable Welder 1 hrs $11.17 40 $447
9 Demolition Mechanic/Welder 1 hrs $37.83 40 $1,513
# Laborer 2 hrs $27.63 80 $2,211
# Small Tools/Misc. Equipment & Expendables 5 hrs $9.04 200 $1,807
Task Subtotal $42,621
RS Means Production Rates
Line Number Title Crew Unit Labor Hours Daily Output
24116130500 B3 CF 0.003 14800
F)Lab Building Task Duration (days)2
1 Excavator w/ Shear & Operator (PC 300) 1 hrs $138.39 16 $2,214
2 Excavator w/ Thumb & Operator (Cat 325B L) 1 hrs $141.60 16 $2,266
3 Front-End Loader & Operator (Cat 980C) 1 hrs $124.03 16 $1,984
4 Front-End Loader & Operator(Cat 988B) 0 hrs $232.73 0 $0
5 35-ton Articulated Haul Truck 2 hrs $151.31 32 $4,842
6 6,000-gal Water Truck & Driver 1 hrs $100.74 16 $1,612
7 55-Ton Crane & Operator 0 hrs $301.87 0 $0
8 Towable Welder 1 hrs $11.17 16 $179
9 Demolition Mechanic/Welder 1 hrs $37.83 16 $605
# Laborer 2 hrs $27.63 32 $884
# Small Tools/Misc. Equipment & Expendables 5 hrs $9.04 80 $723
Task Subtotal $15,309
RS Means Production Rates
Line Number Title Crew Unit Labor Hours Daily Output
24116130500 B3 CF 0.003 14800
Total Building/Structure Demolition Duration (days) 55
Total Building/Structure Demolition Cost $655,381
Total CostTotal
Units
MILL SITE DECOMMISIONING
Building/Structure Demolition (con't)
Units
Unit Cost Total Cost
Total
Units
Building demolition, small buildings or single
buildings, steel, includes 20 mile haul, excludes
salvage, foundation demolition or dump fees
Unit Cost
Quantity UnitsEquipment/Personnel
Equipment/Personnel
Building demolition, small buildings or single
buildings, steel, includes 20 mile haul, excludes
salvage, foundation demolition or dump fees
Quantity
G)Removal of Ore Stockpiles (65,000 CY)Task Duration (days)23
0.003 14800
1 Excavator w/ Thumb & Operator (Cat 325B L) 0 hrs $141.60 0 $0
2 Front-End Loader & Operator (Cat 980C) 1 hrs $124.03 184 $22,821
3 Front-End Loader & Operator(Cat 988B) 1 hrs $232.73 184 $42,823
4 Motor Grader (Cat 14H) 1 hrs $135.36 184 $24,907
5 Dozer (Cat D7E) 0 hrs $137.08 0 $0
6 35-ton Articulated Haul Truck 4 hrs $151.31 736 $111,364
7 Scraper (Cat 631D) 0 hrs $240.46 0 $0
8 Water Wagon (651) 1 hrs $138.98 184 $25,572
9 6,000-gal Water Truck & Driver 1 hrs $100.74 184 $18,536
Task Subtotal $246,023
Assume:
90,000 tons of ore @ 1.4 tons/cy = 64,285 cy
30 cy/load; 3 loads/hr; 8 hrs/day:
65,000/(30x3x8x4) = 22.6 days
RS Means Production Rates
Line Number Title Crew Unit Labor Hours Daily Output
24116130500 B3 CF 0.003 14800
H)Decontamination of Ore Stockpile Pads (216,000 SF)Task Duration (days)6
1 Excavator w/ Thumb & Operator (Cat 325B L) 1 hrs $141.60 48 $6,797
2 Front-End Loader & Operator (Cat 980C) 1 hrs $124.03 48 $5,953
3 Front-End Loader & Operator(Cat 988B) 0 hrs $232.73 0 $0
4 Motor Grader (Cat 14H) 1 hrs $135.36 48 $6,497
5 Dozer (Cat D7E) 1 hrs $137.08 48 $6,580
6 35-ton Articulated Haul Truck 0 hrs $151.31 0 $0
7 Scraper (Cat 631D) 4 hrs $240.46 192 $46,168
8 Water Wagon (651) 1 hrs $138.98 48 $6,671
9 6,000-gal Water Truck & Driver 1 hrs $100.74 48 $4,835
Task Subtotal $83,502
Assume:
Removal of 2 feet (1' clay pad + 1' subgrade soil)
216,000x2/27 = 16,000 CY
28 cy/load; 3 loads/hr; 8 hrs/day:
16,000/(28x3x8x4) = 5.95 days
RS Means Production Rates
Line Number Title Crew Unit Labor Hours Daily Output
24116130500 B3 CF 0.003 14800
I)Equipment Containment Area Cleanup (49,500 SF)Task Duration (days)2
1 Excavator w/ Thumb & Operator (Cat 325B L) 1 hrs $141.60 16 $2,266
2 Front-End Loader & Operator (Cat 980C) 1 hrs $124.03 16 $1,984
3 Front-End Loader & Operator(Cat 988B) 0 hrs $232.73 0 $0
4 Motor Grader (Cat 14H) 1 hrs $135.36 16 $2,166
5 Dozer (Cat D7E) 1 hrs $137.08 16 $2,193
6 35-ton Articulated Haul Truck 2 hrs $151.31 32 $4,842
7 Scraper (Cat 631D) 2 hrs $240.46 32 $7,695
8 Water Wagon (651) 0 hrs $138.98 0 $0
9 6,000-gal Water Truck & Driver 1 hrs $100.74 16 $1,612
Task Subtotal $22,758
Assume:
Haul trucks used for removal of equipment
Scrapers used for soil removal with removal of 1 foot of soil
49,500x1/27 = 1,833 CY
28 cy/load; 3 loads/hr; 8 hrs/day:
1,850/(28x3x8x2) = 1.38 days
RS Means Production Rates
Line Number Title Crew Unit Labor Hours Daily Output
24116130500 B3 CF 0.003 14800
Unit Cost
Units Unit CostQuantity
Equipment/Personnel
Equipment/Personnel Quantity Units
Units
Total
UnitsEquipment/Personnel
Quantity Unit Cost
Total
Units
Total
Units
Total Cost
Total Cost
Total Cost
MILL SITE DECOMMISIONING
Earthworks, Decontamination, Clean-up, and Revegetation
Building demolition, small buildings or single
buildings, steel, includes 20 mile haul, excludes
salvage, foundation demolition or dump fees
Building demolition, small buildings or single
buildings, steel, includes 20 mile haul, excludes
salvage, foundation demolition or dump fees
Building demolition, small buildings or single
buildings, steel, includes 20 mile haul, excludes
salvage, foundation demolition or dump fees
J) Decontamination of Mill Yard (454,000 SF) Task Duration (days) 6
1 Excavator w/ Thumb & Operator (Cat 325B L) 1 hrs $141.60 48 $6,797
2 Front-End Loader & Operator (Cat 980C) 1 hrs $124.03 48 $5,953
3 Front-End Loader & Operator(Cat 988B) 0 hrs $232.73 0 $0
4 Motor Grader (Cat 14H) 1 hrs $135.36 48 $6,497
5 Dozer (Cat D7E) 1 hrs $137.08 48 $6,580
6 35-ton Articulated Haul Truck 2 hrs $151.31 96 $14,526
7 Scraper (Cat 631D) 2 hrs $240.46 96 $23,084
8 Water Wagon (651) 1 hrs $138.98 48 $6,671
9 6,000-gal Water Truck & Driver 1 hrs $100.74 48 $4,835
Task Subtotal $74,944
Assume:
Mill yard area equals total fenced area (670,000 SF) less area of ore stockpile pads (216,000 SF)
Deduct areas of larger buildings/structures:
Mill 25,900
Power House 7,200
Shop/Warehouse 13,300
Lab 4,500
CCD Pad 4,800
Diesel contaminated soils 4,800
Acid impacted soils 4,800
Total 65,300 SF
Net mill yard area for decontamination 398,300 SF
1 foot of soil removed from 50 % of net area
Includes removal of diesell/chemical contaminated soils identified under Task C of Mill Site Decommisioning
Diesel contaminated soils under building from 3/07 legacy spill: 50' x 100' x 10'/27 = 1852 cy
Acid impacted soils from legacy acid tank leak: 50' x 50' x 10'/27=926 cy
398,300x1x0.5/27 = 7,375 CY + 1852 CY + 926 CY = 10,153 CY
28 cy/load; 2 loads/hr; 8 hrs/day:
10,153/(28x2x8x4) = 5.66 days
K) Regrading and Revegetation Task Duration (days) 3
1 Excavator w/ Thumb & Operator (Cat 325B L) 0 hrs $141.60 0 $0
2 Front-End Loader & Operator (Cat 980C) 1 hrs $124.03 24 $2,977
3 Front-End Loader & Operator(Cat 988B) 0 hrs $232.73 0 $0
4 Motor Grader (Cat 14H) 2 hrs $135.36 48 $6,497
5 Dozer (Cat D7E) 1 hrs $137.08 24 $3,290
6 35-ton Articulated Haul Truck 1 hrs $151.31 24 $3,631
7 Scraper (Cat 631D) 2 hrs $240.46 48 $11,542
8 Water Wagon (651) 1 hrs $138.98 24 $3,336
9 6,000-gal Water Truck & Driver 0 hrs $100.74 0 $0
# Farm Tractor w/ accessories & Operator 1 hrs $136.14 24 $3,267
# Seed, Fertilizer, Mulch/Growth Media 27 ac $1,500.00 27 $40,500
Task Subtotal $75,040
Description: Grade site to match surrounding area. Place soils and seeding where required for establishment of plant growth.
Assume:
Includes total area of the mill plateau (i.e., mill yard, ore stockpiles/pads, equipment containment and borrow areas)
Add 20 % for adjacent roads and any other misc. identified areas == 1,223,000*1.2 = 1,467,600 SF (33.7 acres)
Regrading requires soils moved over relatively short distances to match contour(s) with existing topography.
Use motor grader production rate calculated from Caterpillar Performance Handbook with:
S = 5 mph; Le = 12.1 ft, Lo = 1.5 ft; E = 0.75 == A = 5*(12.1 - 1.5)*5,280*0.75 = 209,880 SF/hr (4.82 ac/hr)
33.7/4.82 = 6.99 hrs == use 1 day
6 inches of growth media required for 80 % of total regraded area, placed and processed at 50 % of regrading
production rate == use 2 days
Revegetation area = 33.7*0.8 = 26.96 ac @ $1500/ac (cost estimate from Arnolds Custom Seeding by phone on 12/14/2023).
Total Cost
Equipment/Personnel Quantity Units Unit Cost
Total
UnitsUnits Unit CostEquipment/Personnel Quantity
Total
Units
MILL SITE DECOMMISIONING
Earthworks, Decontamination, Clean-up, and Revegetation (con't)
Total Cost
Also refer to gamma scan locations and values on Figures 3-2 and 3-3 in Tailings Reclamation and Decommisioning Plan (Plateau Resources, 2002 and
2005)
L) Water Management Pond Removal Task Duration (days) 20
1 Excavator w/ Thumb & Operator (Cat 325B L) 1 hrs $141.60 160 $22,656
2 Front-End Loader & Operator (Cat 980C)0 hrs $124.03 0 $0
3 Front-End Loader & Operator(Cat 988B)0 hrs $232.73 0 $0
4 Motor Grader (Cat 14H)1 hrs $135.36 80 $10,829
5 Dozer (Cat D7E)1 hrs $137.08 80 $10,967
6 35-ton Articulated Haul Truck 1 hrs $151.31 40 $6,052
7 Scraper (Cat 631D)1 hrs $240.46 80 $19,237
8 Water Wagon (651)1 hrs $138.98 80 $11,118
9 6,000-gal Water Truck & Driver 1 hrs $100.74 80 $8,059
# 30 C.Y. Roll-off Dumpster 2 hrs $19.09 320 $6,109
#Landfill Disposal(1)150 ton $50.00 150 $207,793
Task Subtotal $302,820
Notes:
(1) Landfill disposal rates from Carbon Co Landfill by phone on 12/12/2023
Assume:
Infrastructure Outside Restricted Area Infrastructure Inside Restricted Area
Pond Liner Surface Area 12,650 SF 250k gallon raw water steel tank
Pond Liner Side Slope 2H:1V 10k water treatment steel tank
110k gallon steel tank Chlorine treatment building
Pump House
2 water wells (1300 ft and 900 ft)2200 FT
Fill Station
2000 CYVolume of Material for Removal
Wt of Landfill Materials 150 TON
M) Debris Stockpile Removal Task Duration (days)30
1 hrs $141.60 240 $33,984
0 hrs $124.03 0 $0
0 hrs $232.73 0 $0
1 hrs $135.36 240 $32,487
1 hrs $137.08 60 $8,225
1 hrs $151.31 60 $9,079
1 hrs $240.46 60 $14,427
1 hrs $138.98 60 $8,339
0 hrs $100.74 0 $0
2 hrs $19.09 480 $9,164
2 hrs $51.87 480 $24,899
16 ton $80.00 16 $31,344
1 Excavator w/ Thumb & Operator (Cat 325B L)
2 Front-End Loader & Operator (Cat 980C)
3 Front-End Loader & Operator(Cat 988B)
4 Motor Grader (Cat 14H)
5 Dozer (Cat D7E)
6 35-ton Articulated Haul Truck
7 Scraper (Cat 631D)
8 Water Wagon (651)
9 6,000-gal Water Truck & Driver
# 30 C.Y. Roll-off Dumpster
# RSO Staff
# Metal Recycling(1)
# Landfill Disposal(2)44 ton $50.00 44 $202,487
Task Subtotal $374,434
Notes:
(1)Metal recycling rates from Stephensons Metal Recycling in Price, Utah by phone on 12/13/2023.
(2)Landfill disposal rates from Carbon Co Landfill by phone on 12/12/2023
Dimensions Amounts of Metal and General Debris for Recycling/Disposal
Main Debris Stockpile Area (approx. 50 ft x 100 ft) 5,000 SF Total Volume of non-11e.(2) Material (Assume 50%)650 CY Per 30 CY
Dumpster
Main Debris Stockpile Side slope 2H:1V 65 CY 3.0
Main Debris Stockpile Height 13 FT 16 TON 6.0
Main Debris Stockpile Volume 32,500 CF 585 CY 20.0
Volume of Metals (Assume 10% of Non-11e.(2))
Wt of Metals
Volume of General Landfill Materials (Assume 90% of Non-11e.(2))
Wt of General Landfill Materials 44 TON 2
620 FT
2 FT
Length of Debris Around Boundary
Width of Debris Around Boundary
Height of Debris Around Boundary 2 FT
Volume of Debris Around Boundary 2,480 CF
Total Volume of Debris for Removal 34,980 CF
1,300 CY
Total Earthworks, Decontamination, Clean-up, & Revegetation Duration (days) 60
Total Earthworks, Decontamination, Clean-up, & Revegetation Cost $805,087
Total Mill Decommisioning Duration (days) 115
Total Mill Decommisioning Cost $1,460,468
Total CostEquipment/Personnel Quantity Units Unit Cost Total
Units
Equipment/Personnel
Assume:
Includes removal of debris stockpile to the west of the former mill site buildings. Remove all debris and place 11e.(2) material into tailing impoundment. Process non-11e.(2) material for
disposal in landfill or metal recycling. Remove 6-inches of soil and place into tailings impoundment. Grade site to match surrounding area. Assume 50% of debris pile is non-11e.(2)
material.
Demolish existing water management pond. Drain pond and remove existing soil within the pond. Remove pond liner. Haul all material outside of the restricted area offsite and dispose in
landfill. Includes costs to abandon 2 water wells place all debris and waste into the tailings impoundment. Grade site to match surrounding area.
MILL SITE DECOMMISIONING
Earthworks, Decontamination, Clean-up, and Revegetation (con't)
Quantity Units Unit Cost
Total
Units Total Cost
A)Mill Site Demolition/Decontamination Materials Task Duration (days)90
1 Excavator w/ Thumb & Operator (Cat 325B L) 0 hrs $141.60 0 0
2 Front-End Loader & Operator (Cat 980C)0 hrs $124.03 0 0
3 Front-End Loader & Operator(Cat 988B)0 hrs $232.73 0 0
4 Motor Grader (Cat 14H)1 hrs $135.36 720 97,462
5 Dozer (Cat D7E)0 hrs $137.08 0 0
6 Dozer (Cat D8K)1 hrs $187.47 720 134,977
7 Compactor (Cat 825B)1 hrs $176.03 720 126,744
8 35-ton Articulated Haul Truck 0 hrs $151.31 0 0
9 Scraper (Cat 631D)0 hrs $240.46 0 0
10 Water Wagon (651)1 hrs $138.98 720 100,066
11 6,000-gal Water Truck & Driver 0 hrs $100.74 0 0
Task Subtotal $459,248
Assume:
RS Means Production Rates
Line Number Title Crew Unit Labor Hours Daily Output
24116130500 B3 CF 0.003 14800
B)Clay Borrow Excavation and Haul Task Duration (days)55
1 Excavator w/ Thumb & Operator (Cat 325B L) 1 hrs $141.60 440 $62,304
2 Front-End Loader & Operator (Cat 980C)1 hrs $124.03 440 $54,572
3 Front-End Loader & Operator(Cat 988B)0 hrs $232.73 0 $0
4 Motor Grader (Cat 14H)1 hrs $135.36 440 $59,560
5 Dozer (Cat D7E)0 hrs $137.08 0 $0
6 Dozer (Cat D8K)1 hrs $187.47 440 $82,486
7 Compactor (Cat 825B)1 hrs $176.03 440 $77,455
8 35-ton Articulated Haul Truck 10 hrs $151.31 4,400 $665,764
9 Scraper (Cat 631D)1 hrs $240.46 440 $105,801
10 Water Wagon (651)1 hrs $138.98 440 $61,151
11 6,000-gal Water Truck & Driver 0 hrs $100.74 0 $0
Task Subtotal $1,169,093
Assume:
300 CY/hr; 8 hrs/day = 2,400 CY/day 65,000 CY
65,000/(2,400)= 31 days 31 days
120 CY/day (hauling) * 10 trucks 54 days
RS Means Production Rates
Line Number Title Crew Unit Labor Hours Daily Output
312316421305 B12D BCY 0.007 2400
312323204068 B34B LCY 0.067 120
TAILINGS RECLAMATION
hauling Units Total
UnitsQuantityUnit Cost
Equipment/Personnel Units Total
UnitsUnit CostQuantity
Building demolition, small buildings or single buildings, steel, includes 20
Total Cost
Total Cost
Description: The mill area demolition is all to be placed in the tailings impoundment. Cost includes placement only. The total volume for disposal from the Mill Demo and Mill
soil cleanup is 26,000 C.Y., all of which is to be disposed of in the tailings cell. To prevent settlement after placement of the mill demo material, all voids will be filled with a
flowable fill.
Includes operations (e.g., placement, compaction, consolidation, etc) within disposal cell for materials from mill site decommisioning. Duration equal to mill site
decommisisioning
Description: Excavate approximately 65,000 C.Y. of clay from the Clay Borrow Area for use in the tailings cover system. Includes hauling costs (Assume 20 miles round trip)
Cycle hauling(wait, load, travel, unload or dump & return) time per cycle,
excavated or borrow, loose cubic yards, 15 min load/wait/unload, 12
C.Y. truck, cycle 20 miles, 35 MPH, excludes loading equipment
Mill Site Demolition Materials
Borrow Excavation
Excavating, bulk bank measure, 5 CY capacity = 300 CY/hour, backhoe,
crawler mounted, excluding truck loading
C)Clay Borrow Haul Road Culvert Replacement Task Duration (days)10
1 Excavator w/ Thumb & Operator (Cat 325B L) 1 hrs $141.60 80 $11,328
2 Front-End Loader & Operator (Cat 980C)1 hrs $124.03 80 $9,922
3 Front-End Loader & Operator(Cat 988B)0 hrs $232.73 0 $0
4 Motor Grader (Cat 14H)0 hrs $135.36 0 $0
5 Dozer (Cat D7E)0 hrs $137.08 0 $0
6 Dozer (Cat D8K)0 hrs $187.47 0 $0
7 Compactor (Cat 825B)0 hrs $176.03 0 $0
8 35-ton Articulated Haul Truck 1 hrs $151.31 80 $12,105
9 Scraper (Cat 631D)0 hrs $240.46 0 $0
10 Water Wagon (651)0 hrs $138.98 0 $0
11 6,000-gal Water Truck & Driver 0 hrs $100.74 0 $0
12 55-Ton Crane 1 hrs $301.87 80 $24,150
Task Subtotal $57,505
Assume:
RS Means Production Rates
Line Number Title Crew Unit Labor Hours Daily Output
24113400100 B69 LF 0.16 300
334211600200 B69 LF 0.425 113
D)Sand Borrow Excavation Task Duration (days)58
1 Excavator w/ Thumb & Operator (Cat 325B L) 2 hrs $141.60 928 $131,405
2 Front-End Loader & Operator (Cat 980C)1 hrs $124.03 464 $57,548
3 Front-End Loader & Operator(Cat 988B)0 hrs $232.73 0 $0
4 Motor Grader (Cat 14H)1 hrs $135.36 464 $62,809
5 Dozer (Cat D7E)0 hrs $137.08 0 $0
6 Dozer (Cat D8K)1 hrs $187.47 464 $86,985
7 Compactor (Cat 825B)1 hrs $176.03 464 $81,679
8 35-ton Articulated Haul Truck 3 hrs $151.31 1,392 $210,623
9 Scraper (Cat 631D)1 hrs $240.46 464 $111,572
10 Water Wagon (651)1 hrs $138.98 464 $64,487
11 6,000-gal Water Truck & Driver 0 hrs $100.74 0 $0
Task Subtotal $807,109
Assume:
300 CY/hr; 8 hrs/day = 2,400 CY/day 240,200 CY
240,200/(2*2,400)= 34 days 58 days
RS Means Production Rates
Line Number Title Crew Unit Labor Hours Daily Output
312316421305 B12D BCY 0.007 2400
Unit Cost Total
Units Total Cost
Description: Replace 36" diameter culvert on clay borrow haul road with 4'x8' reinforced concrete box culvert
Selective demolition, box culvert, precast, 8'x6'x3' to 8'x8'x8', excludes
excavation
Public storm utility drainage piping, concrete, box culvert, precast, base
price, 8' long 8' x3', excludes excavation or backfill
Excavating, bulk bank measure, 5 CY capacity = 300 CY/hour, backhoe,
crawler mounted, excluding truck loading
Description: Excavate approximately 240,200 C.Y. of sand from the Sand Borrow Area for use in the tailings cover system
Total Cost
Equipment/Personnel Quantity Units
Equipment/Personnel Quantity Units
Total
UnitsUnit Cost
E)Pediment Borrow Excavation Task Duration (days)66
1 Excavator w/ Thumb & Operator (Cat 325B L) 2 hrs $141.60 928 $131,405
2 Front-End Loader & Operator (Cat 980C)2 hrs $124.03 928 $115,097
3 Front-End Loader & Operator(Cat 988B)0 hrs $232.73 0 $0
4 Motor Grader (Cat 14H)1 hrs $135.36 464 $62,809
5 Dozer (Cat D7E)0 hrs $137.08 0 $0
6 Dozer (Cat D8K)1 hrs $187.47 464 $86,985
7 Compactor (Cat 825B)1 hrs $176.03 464 $81,679
8 35-ton Articulated Haul Truck 3 hrs $151.31 1,392 $210,623
9 Scraper (Cat 631D)1 hrs $240.46 464 $111,572
10 Water Wagon (651)1 hrs $138.98 464 $64,487
11 6,000-gal Water Truck & Driver 0 hrs $100.74 0 $0
Task Subtotal $864,658
Assume:
300 CY/hr; 8 hrs/day = 2,400 CY/day 274,300 CY
274,300/(2*2,400)= 66 days 66 days
RS Means Production Rates
Line Number Title Crew Unit Labor Hours Daily Output
312316421305 B12D BCY 0.007 2400
F)Rock Borrow Excavation Task Duration (days)84
1 Excavator w/ Thumb & Operator (Cat 325B L) 2 hrs $141.60 1,344 $190,310
2 Front-End Loader & Operator (Cat 980C)2 hrs $124.03 1,344 $166,692
3 Front-End Loader & Operator(Cat 988B)0 hrs $232.73 0 $0
4 Motor Grader (Cat 14H)1 hrs $135.36 672 $90,964
5 Dozer (Cat D7E)0 hrs $137.08 0 $0
6 Dozer (Cat D8K)1 hrs $187.47 672 $125,978
7 Compactor (Cat 825B)1 hrs $176.03 672 $118,294
8 35-ton Articulated Haul Truck 3 hrs $151.31 2,016 $305,041
9 Scraper (Cat 631D)1 hrs $240.46 672 $161,588
10 Water Wagon (651)1 hrs $138.98 672 $93,395
11 6,000-gal Water Truck & Driver 0 hrs $100.74 0 $0
Task Subtotal $1,252,263
Assume:
300 CY/hr; 8 hrs/day = 2,400 CY/day 350,000 CY
350,000/(2*2,400)= 84 days 84 days
RS Means Production Rates
Line Number Title Crew Unit Labor Hours Daily Output
312316421305 B12D BCY 0.007 2400
TAILINGS RECLAMATION
Equipment/Personnel Quantity Units Unit Cost
Total
Units Total Cost
Description: Excavate approximately 274,300 C.Y. of pediment soils from the Pediment Borrow Area for use in the tailings cover system
Excavating, bulk bank measure, 5 CY capacity = 300 CY/hour, backhoe,
crawler mounted, excluding truck loading
Equipment/Personnel Quantity
Borrow Excavation (cont.)
Total
Units Total Cost
Description: Excavate approximately 350,000 C.Y. of rock from the Rock Borrow Area for use in the tailings cover system and drainage channels
Excavating, bulk bank measure, 5 CY capacity = 300 CY/hour, backhoe,
crawler mounted, excluding truck loading
Units Unit Cost
G)North Regrading (120,700 CY cut, 191,800 fill/regrading)*Task Duration (days)100
1 Excavator w/ Thumb & Operator (Cat 325B L) 0 hrs $141.60 0 $0
2 Front-End Loader & Operator (Cat 980C)0 hrs $124.03 0 $0
3 Front-End Loader & Operator(Cat 988B)1 hrs $232.73 800 $186,188
4 Motor Grader (Cat 14H)1 hrs $135.36 800 $108,291
5 Dozer (Cat D7E)0 hrs $137.08 0 $0
6 Dozer (Cat D8K)4 hrs $187.47 3,200 $599,897
7 Compactor (Cat 825B)1 hrs $176.03 800 $140,826
8 35-ton Articulated Haul Truck 3 hrs $151.31 2,400 $363,144
9 Scraper (Cat 631D)1 hrs $240.46 800 $192,366
10 Water Wagon (651)1 hrs $138.98 800 $111,184
11 6,000-gal Water Truck & Driver 0 hrs $100.74 0 0
Task Subtotal $1,701,896
Assume:
* Quantity from Section 11.2.5 of Tailings Reclamation and Decommisioning Plan (Plateau Resources, 2002)
625 CY/hr; 8 hrs/day = 5,000 CY/day
30,000/5,000 = 6.0 days
Excavation/Cut 120,700 CY
120,700/1,280 = 94.3 days 94.3 days
Fill 191,800 CY
191,800/2400 = 80 days 79.9 days
Grading
360,000 SF
3.60
1.30
RS Means Production Rates
Line Number Title Crew Unit Labor Hours Daily Output
312316421350 B10Q BCY 0.006 1280
312323170190 B10M LCY 0.013 600
312213200280 B11L ea 0.36
H)Task Duration (days)30
1 Excavator w/ Thumb & Operator (Cat 325B L) 0 hrs $141.60 0 $0
2 Front-End Loader & Operator (Cat 980C)0 hrs $124.03 0 $0
3 Front-End Loader & Operator(Cat 988B)1 hrs $232.73 240 $55,856
4 Motor Grader (Cat 14H)1 hrs $135.36 240 $32,487
5 Dozer (Cat D7E)1 hrs $137.08 240 $32,900
6 Dozer (Cat D8K)2 hrs $187.47 480 $89,985
7 Compactor (Cat 825B)1 hrs $176.03 240 $42,248
8 35-ton Articulated Haul Truck 3 hrs $151.31 720 $108,943
9 Scraper (Cat 631D)1 hrs $240.46 240 $57,710
10 Water Wagon (651)1 hrs $138.98 240 $33,355
11 6,000-gal Water Truck & Driver 0 hrs $100.74 0 0
Task Subtotal $453,484
Assume:
Countouring/ Cut 19,000 CY
19,000 CY/(2*1,280) CY/day = 7.4 days 7.4 days
Place 53,000 CY rock for riprap 53,000 CY
53,000 CY/ 2400 CY/day = 16.2 days 22 days
RS Means Production Rates
Line Number Title Crew Unit Labor Hours Daily Output
312316421350 B10Q BCY 0.006 1280
312323170190 B10M LCY 0.013 600
312213200280 B11L ea 0.36
313713100300 B11A LCY 0.02 800
TAILINGS RECLAMATION
Contour drainage channel in North Grading area. Assume 19,000 CY cut and 53,000 CY rock fill for rip rap
Riprap and rock lining, random, broken stone, 50 lb average, dumped
General fill, Spread fill, from stockpile with 2-1/2 C.Y. F.E. loader, with
Rough grading sites, open, 75,100-100,00 S.F. grader
Total
Units
Equipment/Personnel Quantity Units
Rough grading sites, open, 75,100-100,00 S.F. grader
General fill, Spread fill, from stockpile with 2-1/2 C.Y. F.E. loader, with
Excavating, bulk bank measure, 5 CY capacity = 160 CY/hour, front end
Excavating, bulk bank measure, 5 CY capacity = 160 CY/hour, front end
Total Cost
Total Cost
Regrading / Channel Construction
Drainage Channel Construction, North Grading (19,000
CY cut, 53,000 CY rock fill)*
Equipment/Personnel Quantity Units
Description: The contouring of the cross valley berm and the north and east dikes consists of a cut volume of 30,000 C.Y.
Unit Cost Total
Units
Unit Cost
I)Drainage Channel Construction, South Grading (169,000 CY fill)Task Duration (days)22
1 Excavator w/ Thumb & Operator (Cat 325B L) 0 hrs $141.60 0 $0
2 Front-End Loader & Operator (Cat 980C)0 hrs $124.03 0 $0
3 Front-End Loader & Operator(Cat 988B)1 hrs $232.73 176 $40,961
4 Motor Grader (Cat 14H)1 hrs $135.36 176 $23,824
5 Dozer (Cat D7E)1 hrs $137.08 176 $24,126
6 Dozer (Cat D8K)2 hrs $187.47 352 $65,989
7 Compactor (Cat 825B)1 hrs $176.03 176 $30,982
8 35-ton Articulated Haul Truck 3 hrs $151.31 528 $79,892
9 Scraper (Cat 631D)1 hrs $240.46 176 $42,321
10 Water Wagon (651)1 hrs $138.98 176 $24,461
11 6,000-gal Water Truck & Driver 0 hrs $100.74 0 0
Task Subtotal $332,555
Assume:
Place 53,000 CY rock for riprap 53,000 CY
53,000 CY/ 2400 CY/day = 16.2 days 22 days
RS Means Production Rates
Line Number Title Crew Unit Labor Hours Daily Output
312316421350 B10Q BCY 0.006 1280
312323170190 B10M LCY 0.013 600
312213200280 B11L ea 0.36
313713100300 B11A LCY 0.02 800
J)Tailings Cell Regrading Task Duration (days)42
1 Excavator w/ Thumb & Operator (Cat 325B L) 0 hrs $141.60 0 $0
2 Front-End Loader & Operator (Cat 980C)0 hrs $124.03 0 $0
3 Front-End Loader & Operator(Cat 988B)1 hrs $232.73 336 $78,199
4 Motor Grader (Cat 14H)1 hrs $135.36 336 $45,482
5 Dozer (Cat D7E)1 hrs $137.08 336 $46,059
6 Dozer (Cat D8K)2 hrs $187.47 672 $125,978
7 Compactor (Cat 825B)1 hrs $176.03 336 $59,147
8 35-ton Articulated Haul Truck 0 hrs $151.31 0 $0
9 Scraper (Cat 631D)0 hrs $240.46 0 $0
10 Water Wagon (651)1 hrs $138.98 336 $46,697
11 6,000-gal Water Truck & Driver 0 hrs $100.74 0 0
Task Subtotal $401,563
Assume:
General Fill 10,000 CY
10,000 CY / 1200 8.3 days
Rough Grading 30 ac 1,306,800 SQ FT
30 ac * 0.36 /100,000 SF = 5 days 5 days 13.07
Fine Grading 30 ac 145,200 SQ YD
30 ac / 5000 SY/day = 29 days 29 days
42 days
RS Means Production Rates
Line Number Title Crew Unit Labor Hours Daily Output
312323170190 General fill, B10M LCY 0.013 600
312213200280 B11L ea 0.36
312216101020 B32C SY 0.01 5000
Contour drainage channel in North Grading area. Assume 19,000 CY cut and 53,000 CY rock fill for rip rap
Riprap and rock lining, random, broken stone, 50 lb average, dumped
TAILINGS RECLAMATION
General fill, Spread fill, from stockpile with 2-1/2 C.Y. F.E. loader, with
Rough grading sites, open, 75,100-100,00 S.F. grader
Equipment/Personnel Quantity Units Unit Cost
Total
Units Total Cost
Final grading of tailings cell after dewatering is complete. Assume 44,700 CY cut and 80,400 CY fill. 35,700 CY Net fill (incl. 26,000 CY of mill debris)
Equipment/Personnel Quantity Units Unit Cost
Total
Units
Regrading / Channel Construction (cont.)
Excavating, bulk bank measure, 5 CY capacity = 160 CY/hour, front end
Total Cost
Rough grading sites, open, 75,100-100,00 S.F. grader
Fine grading, loam or topsoil fine grade for large area, 15,000 SY or
K)Interim Sand Cover Material (97,000 CY)*Task Duration (days)22
1 Excavator w/ Thumb & Operator (Cat 325B L) 1 hrs $141.60 176 $24,922
2 Front-End Loader & Operator (Cat 980C) 0 hrs $124.03 0 $0
3 Front-End Loader & Operator(Cat 988B) 1 hrs $232.73 176 $40,961
4 Motor Grader (Cat 14H) 1 hrs $135.36 176 $23,824
5 Dozer (Cat D7E) 1 hrs $137.08 176 $24,126
6 Dozer (Cat D8K) 0 hrs $187.47 0 $0
7 Compactor (Cat 825B) 1 hrs $176.03 176 $30,982
8 35-ton Articulated Haul Truck 3 hrs $151.31 528 $79,892
9 Scraper (Cat 631D) 3 hrs $240.46 528 $126,962
10 Water Wagon (651) 1 hrs $138.98 176 $24,461
11 6,000-gal Water Truck & Driver 0 hrs $100.74 0 $0
Task Subtotal $376,129
Assume:
Assume loading hauling, and placing of 97,000 CY sand for interim cover
550 CY/hr; 8 hrs/day = 4,400 CY/day
97,000/4,400 = 22 days 22
RS Means Production Rates
Line Number Title Crew Unit Labor Hours Daily Output
312316421350 B10Q BCY 0.006 1280
L) Task Duration (days) 18
1 Excavator w/ Thumb & Operator (Cat 325B L) 1 hrs $141.60 176 $24,922
2 Front-End Loader & Operator (Cat 980C) 0 hrs $124.03 0 $0
3 Front-End Loader & Operator(Cat 988B) 1 hrs $232.73 176 $40,961
4 Motor Grader (Cat 14H) 1 hrs $135.36 176 $23,824
5 Dozer (Cat D7E) 1 hrs $137.08 176 $24,126
6 Dozer (Cat D8K) 0 hrs $187.47 0 $0
7 Compactor (Cat 825B) 1 hrs $176.03 176 $30,982
8 35-ton Articulated Haul Truck 3 hrs $151.31 528 $79,892
9 Scraper (Cat 631D) 3 hrs $240.46 528 $126,962
10 Water Wagon (651) 1 hrs $138.98 176 $24,461
11 6,000-gal Water Truck & Driver 0 hrs $100.74 0 $0
Task Subtotal $376,129
Assume:
Assume loading hauling, and placing of 78,200 CY sand for interim cover
550 CY/hr; 8 hrs/day = 4,400 CY/day
78,200/4,400 = 22 days 18
RS Means Production Rates
Line Number Title Crew Unit Labor Hours Daily Output
312316421350 B10Q BCY 0.006 1280
Equipment/Personnel Quantity Units Unit Cost
Total
Units Total Cost
Interim Cover Construction
Final Cover Construction
Total
Units Total Cost
Excavating, bulk bank measure, 5 CY capacity = 160 CY/hour, front end
loader, track mounted, excluding truck loading
Quantity Units Unit Cost
TAILINGS RECLAMATION
Equipment/Personnel
Excavating, bulk bank measure, 5 CY capacity = 160 CY/hour, front end
loader, track mounted, excluding truck loading
Additional Interim Sand Cover Material for Camber Adjustment
(78,200 CY)*
M)Clay Cover Material (65,000 CY)*Task Duration (days)41
1 Excavator w/ Thumb & Operator (Cat 325B L) 1 hrs $141.60 328 $46,445
2 Front-End Loader & Operator (Cat 980C) 0 hrs $124.03 0 $0
3 Front-End Loader & Operator(Cat 988B) 1 hrs $232.73 328 $76,337
4 Motor Grader (Cat 14H) 1 hrs $135.36 328 $44,399
5 Dozer (Cat D7E) 1 hrs $137.08 328 $44,963
6 Dozer (Cat D8K) 0 hrs $187.47 0 $0
7 Compactor (Cat 825B) 1 hrs $176.03 328 $57,739
8 35-ton Articulated Haul Truck 2 hrs $151.31 656 $99,259
9 Scraper (Cat 631D) 4 hrs $240.46 1,312 $315,481
10 Water Wagon (651) 1 hrs $138.98 328 $45,586
11 6,000-gal Water Truck & Driver 1 hrs $100.74 328 $33,042
12 Farm Tractor w/ accessories 1 hrs 136.14051 328 $44,654
Task Subtotal $807,904
Assume:
Assume loading hauling, and placing of 65,000 CY clay for cover
200 CY/hr; 8 hrs/day = 1,600 CY/day
65,000/1,600 = 41 days 41
RS Means Production Rates
Line Number Title Crew Unit Labor Hours Daily Output
312316421350 B10Q BCY 0.006 1280
N)Final Sand Cover Material (64,000 CY)*Task Duration (days)15
1 Excavator w/ Thumb & Operator (Cat 325B L) 1 hrs $141.60 120 $16,992
2 Front-End Loader & Operator (Cat 980C) 0 hrs $124.03 0 $0
3 Front-End Loader & Operator(Cat 988B) 1 hrs $232.73 120 $27,928
4 Motor Grader (Cat 14H) 1 hrs $135.36 120 $16,244
5 Dozer (Cat D7E) 1 hrs $137.08 120 $16,450
6 Dozer (Cat D8K) 0 hrs $187.47 0 $0
7 Compactor (Cat 825B) 1 hrs $176.03 120 $21,124
8 35-ton Articulated Haul Truck 3 hrs $151.31 360 $54,472
9 Scraper (Cat 631D) 3 hrs $240.46 360 $86,565
10 Water Wagon (651) 1 hrs $138.98 120 $16,678
11 6,000-gal Water Truck & Driver 0 hrs $100.74 0 $0
Task Subtotal $256,452
Assume:
Assume loading hauling, and placing of 64,000 CY sand for final cover
550 CY/hr; 8 hrs/day = 4,400 CY/day
64,000/4,400 = 15 days 15
O)Pediment Soil Cover Material (274,300 CY)*Task Duration (days)62
1 Excavator w/ Thumb & Operator (Cat 325B L) 1 hrs $141.60 496 $70,234
2 Front-End Loader & Operator (Cat 980C) 0 hrs $124.03 0 $0
3 Front-End Loader & Operator(Cat 988B) 1 hrs $232.73 496 $115,436
4 Motor Grader (Cat 14H) 1 hrs $135.36 496 $67,140
5 Dozer (Cat D7E) 1 hrs $137.08 496 $67,992
6 Dozer (Cat D8K) 0 hrs $187.47 0 $0
7 Compactor (Cat 825B) 1 hrs $176.03 496 $87,312
8 35-ton Articulated Haul Truck 3 hrs $151.31 1,488 $225,149
9 Scraper (Cat 631D) 3 hrs $240.46 1,488 $357,801
10 Water Wagon (651) 1 hrs $138.98 496 $68,934
11 6,000-gal Water Truck & Driver 0 hrs $100.74 0 $0
Task Subtotal $1,060,000
Assume:
Assume loading hauling, and placing of 274,300 CY pediment soil for cover
550 CY/hr; 8 hrs/day = 4,400 CY/day
274,300/4,400 = 62 days 62
RS Means Production Rates
Line Number Title Crew Unit Labor Hours Daily Output
312316421350 B10Q BCY 0.006 1280
Total
UnitsUnits
Equipment/Personnel Quantity Units Unit Cost
Total
Units Total Cost
Quantity Units
Equipment/Personnel
Excavating, bulk bank measure, 5 CY capacity = 160 CY/hour, front end
loader, track mounted, excluding truck loading
Excavating, bulk bank measure, 5 CY capacity = 160 CY/hour, front end
loader, track mounted, excluding truck loading
Total
UnitsUnit Cost Total CostEquipment/Personnel
Total CostQuantity Unit Cost
TAILINGS RECLAMATION
Final Cover Construction (cont.)
P) Rock Mulch Cover Placement (20,500 CY)* Task Duration (days) 10
1 Excavator w/ Thumb & Operator (Cat 325B L) 0 hrs $141.60 0 $0
2 Front-End Loader & Operator (Cat 980C) 1 hrs $124.03 80 $9,922
3 Front-End Loader & Operator(Cat 988B) 0 hrs $232.73 0 $0
4 Motor Grader (Cat 14H) 1 hrs $135.36 80 $10,829
5 Dozer (Cat D7E) 0 hrs $137.08 0 $0
6 Dozer (Cat D8K) 1 hrs $187.47 80 $14,997
7 Compactor (Cat 825B) 0 hrs $176.03 0 $0
8 35-ton Articulated Haul Truck 3 hrs $151.31 240 $36,314
9 Scraper (Cat 631D) 0 hrs $240.46 0 $0
10 Water Wagon (651) 1 hrs $138.98 80 $11,118
11 6,000-gal Water Truck & Driver 0 hrs $100.74 0 $0
Task Subtotal $83,181
Assume:
Assume loading hauling, and placing of 20,500 CY rock mulch for cover
30 cy/load; 3 loads/hr; 8 hrs/day:
20,500/(30x3x8x3) = 9.5 days 9.5
RS Means Production Rates
Line Number Title Crew Unit Labor Hours Daily Output
312316421350 B10Q BCY 0.006 1280
Q) Rock Mulch and Riprap Production* Task Duration (days) 26
1 Excavator w/ Thumb & Operator (Cat 325B L) 0 hrs $141.60 0 $0
2 Front-End Loader & Operator (Cat 980C) 1 hrs $124.03 208 $25,798
3 Front-End Loader & Operator(Cat 988B) 0 hrs $232.73 0 $0
4 Motor Grader (Cat 14H) 0 hrs $135.36 0 $0
5 Dozer (Cat D7E) 1 hrs $137.08 208 $28,513
6 Dozer (Cat D8K) 0 hrs $187.47 0 $0
7 Compactor (Cat 825B) 0 hrs $176.03 0 $0
8 35-ton Articulated Haul Truck 0 hrs $151.31 0 $0
9 Scraper (Cat 631D) 0 hrs $240.46 0 $0
10 Screen Plants/Generator 1 hrs $136.14 208 $28,317
11 6,000-gal Water Truck & Driver 0 hrs $100.74 0 $0
Task Subtotal $82,628
Cost per CY $2.33
Assume:
Screen plant production = 125 CY/hr with 25% reject rate
20,500*1.25 = 25,625/125 = 205 hrs (25.6 days) 25.6
RS Means Production Rates
Line Number Title Crew Unit Labor Hours Daily Output
313713100100 B12G LCY 0.258 62
Final Cover Construction (cont.)
Units Unit Cost Total Cost
Total
UnitsEquipment/Personnel Quantity Units Unit Cost
Total
Units
Rip-rap and rock lining, random, broken stone, machine placed for slope
protection
Total Cost
Excavating, bulk bank measure, 5 CY capacity = 160 CY/hour, front end
loader, track mounted, excluding truck loading
Equipment/Personnel Quantity
TAILINGS RECLAMATION
R) Windblown Contamination & General Regrading Task Duration (days)40
1 Excavator w/ Thumb & Operator (Cat 325B L) 0 hrs $141.60 0 $0
2 Front-End Loader & Operator (Cat 980C)1 hrs $124.03 320 $39,689
3 Front-End Loader & Operator(Cat 988B)1 hrs $232.73 320 $74,475
4 Motor Grader (Cat 14H)1 hrs $135.36 320 $43,316
5 Dozer (Cat D7E)1 hrs $137.08 320 $43,866
6 Dozer (Cat D8K)0 hrs $187.47 0 $0
7 Compactor (Cat 825B)1 hrs $176.03 320 $56,331
8 35-ton Articulated Haul Truck 2 hrs $151.31 640 $96,838
9 Scraper (Cat 631D)4 hrs $240.46 1,280 $307,786
10 Water Wagon (651)1 hrs $138.98 320 $44,474
11 6,000-gal Water Truck & Driver 0 hrs $100.74 0 $0
Task Subtotal $706,775
Assume:
Required for 20 % of the site less the mill plateau and covered tailings cell areas
Total Site: 640 ac
- Mill Plateau: 30 ac
- Covered Tailings Cell: 30 ac
Net Total: 580 ac
20% 116 ac
116*43,560*1 = 187,147 CY with 50 % windblown contaminated soils and 50 % general/random regrading.
Windblown contaminated soils average 1' depth to be placed in tailings cell: 94,000 CY
500 CY/hr; 8 hrs/day = 4,000 CY/day
94,000/4,000 = 24.0 days
Random/General regrading soils depth of 1' or less moved over short distances: 94,000 CY
750 CY/hr; 8 hrs/day = 6,000 CY/day
94,000/6,000 = 16.0 days
RS Means Production Rates
Line Number Title Crew Unit Labor Hours Daily Output
312213200280 B11L EA 44.44 0.36
312216101020 B32C SY 0.01 5000
Total Tailings Reclamation Duration (days)791
Total Tailings Reclamation Cost $11,248,571
TAILINGS RECLAMATION
Final Cover Construction (cont.)
Rough grading sites, open 75,000-100,000 SF, grader
Fine grading, loam or topsoil fine grade for large area, 15,000 SY or
Unit Cost Total CostTotal
UnitsEquipment/Personnel Quantity Units
A) Management, Monitoring, and Miscellaneous Items
Task
Duration
(days)
320 hrs/day
8
1 Project Manager/Engineer 1 hrs $70.45 2,560 $180,340
2 Secretary 1 hrs $24.67 2,560 $63,164
3 Clerk 1 hrs $25.78 2,560 $65,994
4 Radiation Safety Officer/Engineer 2 hrs $51.87 5,120 $265,584
5 Superintendent/Foreman 1 hrs $27.50 2,560 $70,396
6 Equipment Maintenance Mechanic 1 hrs $37.83 2,560 $96,843
7 Fuel/Lube Truck 1 hrs $96.04 2,560 $245,869
8 Lab/Field Technicians (rad, soils, etc)2 hrs $30.43 5,120 $155,815
9 Senior Lab/Field Technician (rad, soils, etc)2 hrs $36.15 5,120 $185,091
10 Security 2 hrs $21.99 5,120 $112,564
11 Field Office Mob/Demob, Setup, Rent(1)1 LS $10,565 1 $10,565
12 Field Office Power(1)(2)1 mo $2,642 12 $31,701
13 Field Office Fuel(3)1 wk $116 48 $5,581
14 Office Supplies(1)1 mo $685 12 $8,220
15 Personnel Living Expenses(4)28 day $280 8,960 $2,508,800
16 Final Decommissioning and As-Built Report 1 LS $75,000 1 $75,000
17 Radiological Scan/Survey Equipment Expenses(5)1 LS $66,240 1 $66,240
18 Analytical Radiological Test Samples (Ra, U)(6)1 ea $391 200 $78,200
19 Analytical Environmental Test Samples(6)1 ea $322 100 $32,200
20 Radon Flux Testing(7)1 ea $125 100 $12,500
21 Equipment Mobilization/Demobilization(8)1 LS $381,923 1 $381,923
Task Subtotal $4,652,593
Notes:
Total Management and Miscellaneous Duration (days)320
Total Management and Miscellaneous Cost $4,652,593
Radiological Scan/Survey Equipment Expenses
Year CPI-U CPI-U Increase Cost
2013 --42,924$
2014 1.37% 586.35$ 43,510$
2015 0.30%129.85$ 43,640$
2016 1.46% 637.85$ 44,278$
2017 2.10% 931.61$ 45,209$
2018 2.33% 1,053.31$ 46,263$
2019 1.92% 890.24$ 47,153$
2020 1.19% 559.31$ 47,712$
2021 4.76% 2,269.71$ 49,982$
2022 8.43% 4,215.21$ 54,197$
2023 3.45% 1,868.15$ 56,065$
(3) Generator fuel use based on the equipment fuel capacity consumed over a week (50 gal/wk). Unit cost of fuel determined as the 36-month
average of Producer Price Index - Commodities, Fuels and related products and power (Series ID: WPU05).
(4) Living expenses at 2024 GSA Standard per diem rate.
(5) Based on equipment rental pricing from Environmental Resource Group obtained 1/9/2024.
Management and Miscellaneous
Equipment/Personnel/Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Total Units Total Cost
(1) Montly Costs derived from RSMeans data on 10/30/2023, Heavy Construction. Assume an 8-hr mob/demob time except for equipment
weighing over 40-tons.
(2) Power provided by a Wacker 54 KW generator
(6) Based on cost estimate from ACZ Laboratories obtained on 12/15/2023.
(7) Based on cost estimate from Environmental Resource Group obtained on 12/15/2023.
(8) Mobilization/Demobilization costs outlined in Equipment table.
Monthly Hourly(1)Use (gal/hr) Cost ($/hr)
$8,894 $44.47 $52,672 $2.22 12.7 $29.53 $35.10 $124.03
$25,737 $128.68 $52,672 $6.43 18.8 $43.72 $35.10 $232.73
$10,864 $54.32 $16,523 $2.72 13.0 $30.23 $35.10 $135.36
$11,381 $56.90 $13,353 $2.85 12.7 $29.53 $35.10 $137.08
$18,571 $92.86 $16,523 $4.64 16.5 $38.37 $35.10 $187.47
$12,636 $63.18 $16,523 $3.16 14.8 $34.42 $35.75 $151.31
$25,497 $127.49 $52,672 $6.37 21.5 $50.00 $35.10 $240.46
$16,647 $83.23 $16,523 $4.16 16.1 $37.44 $35.10 $176.03
$8,894 $44.47 $13,353 $2.22 17.0 $39.53 $35.75 $138.98
$8,894 $44.47 $13,353 $2.22 5.5 $12.79 $35.75 $100.74
$27,319 $170.74 $8,502 $8.54 25.0 $58.14 $39.46 $301.87
$8,000 $40.00 included $2.00 5.5 $12.79 $35.75 $96.04
$734 $3.67 $13,353 $0.18 2.2 $5.12 --- $11.17
$2,019 $10.10 $13,353 $0.50 27.0 $62.79 $35.75 $136.14
$10,072.37 $57.23 $13,353 $2.86 14.0 $32.56 --- $106.65
$3,200.00 $18.18 $10,015 $0.91 0.0 $0.00 --- $19.09
$400.00 $2.27 $0 $0.11 2.0 $4.65 --- $9.04
Notes:
Nov-20 151.00 Aug-22 286.9
Dec-20 157.00 Sep-22 283.9
Jan-21 163.1 Oct-22 275.2
Feb-21 179.0 Nov-22 263.4
Mar-21 185.5 Dec-22 242.8
Apr-21 181.4 Jan-23 250.8
May-21 191.9 Feb-23 244.5
Jun-21 198.7 Mar-23 236.2
Jul-21 208.0 Apr-23 233.7
Aug-21 207.0 May-23 222.9
Sep-21 212.7 Jun-23 225.6
Oct-21 227.2 Jul-23 230.0
Nov-21 229.9 Aug-23 248.7
Dec-21 216.9 Sep-23 254.5
Jan-22 226.8 Oct-23 241.3
Feb-22 244.9
Mar-22 261.6
Apr-22 271.0
May-22 296.4
Jun-22 326.0
Jul-22 295.3
Equipment Description
$29.07 $35.10 $138.39Excavator w/ Shear (PC 300)(5)$11,756 $58.78 $16,523 $2.94
$35.10
Rental Cost ($)Operator
($/hr)
Mob/Demob
(both ways)(2)
Expendables
($/hr)(3)
Fuel(4)
$58.04 13.7 $31.86
Total Cost
($/hr)
ESTIMATED EQUIPMENT COSTS
12.5
Excavator w/ Thumb (Cat 325B L)(5)$52,672 $2.90 $141.60
55-Ton Crane(5)
Water Wagon (Cat 651)(5)
6,000-gal Water Truck(5)
Dozer (Cat D8K)(5)
Scraper (Cat 631D)(65
Compactor (Cat 825B)(5)
Front-End Loader (Cat 980C)(5)
Front-End Loader (Cat 988B)(5)
Dozer (Cat D7E)(5)
35-ton Articulated Haul Truck(5)
Motor Grader (Cat 14H)(5)
$11,608
2.325
Fuel/Lube Truck(5)
Towable Welder(5)
Screen Plants/Generators(5)
(3) Estimated at 5% of hourly cost. Includes any items that would not be covered under rental costs (e.g., tire and ground engaging tool wear, and fluids,
excluding fuel).
(4) Fuel use based on the equipment fuel capacity consumed over a design operating period of 10 hrs. Unit cost of fuel determined as the 36-month average
of Producer Price Index - Commodities, Fuels and related products and power (Series ID: WPU05).
(5) Montly Rental Cost and Mob/Demob derived from RSMeans data on 10/30/2023, Heavy Construction. Assume an 8-hr mob/demob time except for
equipment weighing over 40-tons.
Producer Price Index - Commodities, Fuels and related products and power (Series ID: WPU05)
(1) Hourly rates for cranes based on 160 hrs/month, 176 hrs/month for screen plants, and 200 hrs/month for all other equipment.
(2) Mobilization/Demobilization costs for the indicated equipment are not factored into total hourly costs.
Farm Tractor w/ accessories(5)
36-Month Average
30 C.Y. Roll-off Dumpster(6)
Small Tools/Misc. Equipment & Expendables
(6) Montly Rental Cost and Mob/Demob derived from RSMeans data on 12/13/2023, Heavy Construction. Assume an 8-hr mob/demob time except for
Specified Wages - Bureau of Labor Statistics
Legally
Required(3)All Other(4)
$21.35 $1.60 $4.67 $27.63
Power Equipment Operators
$27.13 $2.04 $5.94 $35.10
$30.50 $2.29 $6.67 $39.46
$27.13 $2.04 $5.94 $35.10
$27.13 $2.04 $5.94 $35.10
$27.13 $2.04 $5.94 $35.10
$27.13 $2.04 $5.94 $35.10
$27.63 $2.07 $6.05 $35.75
Notes:
Bureau of Labor Statistics
(1) Base rates derived from mean wages reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the Central Utah Nonmetropolitan Area
from May 2022. Includes a cost of living increase of 14.3% from May 2022 thru October 2023.
(2) Base rates derived from mean wages reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the Utah from May 2021. Includes a
cost of living increase of of 14.3% from May 2022 thru October 2023.
(3) 8.35% of base rate for all labor classifications. Includes: FICA, Medicare, FUI, SUI, & Workers Compensation. (BLS ECEC
Table 6).
(4) 25.19% of base rate for labor classifications w/o mandated fringes. Includes: Paid leave, Supplemental pay, Insurances, &
Retirement/savings. (BLS ECEC Table 6).
(5) Total cost per hour does not include living expenses. A separate line item has been included in the Management and
Miscellaneous table to account for living expenses.
ESTIMATED LABOR COSTS
Scrapers(1)
Benefits
Mandated Total Cost per
Hour(5)
Backhoes\Excavator(1)
Laborer(1)
Cranes(2)
Labor Classification
Dozers(1)
Graders(1)
Truck Drivers(1)
Loaders(1)
Non-specified Wages
Legally
Required(3)All Other(4)
$19.89 $1.57 $4.32 $25.78
$27.89 $2.20 $6.06 $36.15
$21.22 $1.67 $4.61 $27.50
$54.36 $4.28 $11.81 $70.45
$29.19 $2.30 $6.34 $37.83
$40.02 $3.15 $8.70 $51.87
$23.48 $1.85 $5.10 $30.43
$19.04 $1.50 $4.14 $24.67
$16.96 $1.34 $3.69 $21.99
ESTIMATED LABOR COSTS
(1) Base rates derived from mean wages reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the Central Utah Nonmetropolitan Area
from May 2022. Includes a cost of living increase of 14.3% from May 2022 thru October 2023.
(2) Base rates derived from mean wages reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the Utah from May 2021. Includes a
cost of living increase of of 14.3% from May 2022 thru October 2023.
(3) 8.13% of base rate for all labor classifications. Includes: FICA, Medicare, FUI, SUI, & Workers Compensation. (BLS ECEC
Table 5).
(4) 20.24% of base rate for all labor classifications. Includes: Paid leave, Supplemental pay, Insurances, & Retirement/savings.
(BLS ECEC Table 5).
(5) Total cost per hour does not include living expenses. A separate line item has been included in the Management and
Miscellaneous table to account for living expenses.
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Clerk(1)
Environmental Technician(1)
Mandated
Benefits Total Cost per
Hour(5)
Mechanic(1)
Labor Classification
Maintenance Foreman(1)
Manager/Engineer(1)
Radiation Safety Officer(1)
Sample Crew Member(2)
Secretary(2)
Security Personnel(2)
Employer Costs for Employee Compensation (ECEC), June 2023 - Table 5
Cost Percent Cost Percent Cost Percent Cost Percent
$55.57 100 $39.75 100 $47.32 100 $22.45 100 100
$22.02 39.63 $11.18 28.13 $14.65 30.96 $4.42 19.69 29.60
$4.08 7.34 $2.99 7.52 $3.40 7.19 $2.12 9.44 7.87
$17.94 32.28 $8.19 20.60 $11.25 23.77 $2.30 10.24 21.73
Employer Costs for Employee Compensation (ECEC), June 2023 - Table 6
Cost Percent
$41.03 100
$12.06 29.4
$3.08 7.5
$8.98 21.9
Base Wage/Salary
4
Group
1 2 3Component Average
Percent
Base Wage/Salary
Total Benefits:
Legally Required
All Other
Component
Total Benefits:
Legally Required
All Other
Consumer Price Index - All Urban Consumers (Series ID: CUUR0000SA0)
CPI CPI
212.193 216.741
212.709 217.631
213.240 218.009
213.856 218.178
215.693 217.965
215.351 218.011
215.834 218.312
215.969 218.439
216.177 218.711
216.330 218.803
215.949 219.179
216.687 220.223
216.741 221.309
215.133 218.578
CPI
221.309
223.467
224.906
225.964
225.722
225.922
226.545
226.889
226.421
226.230
225.672
226.665
227.663
225.644
CPI
227.663
229.392
230.085
229.815
229.478
229.104
230.379
231.407
231.317
230.221
229.601
230.280
232.166
230.070
Month-Year
May-10
June-10
July-10
February-10
March-10
April-10
August-09 August-10
September-09 September-10
October-10
February-12
March-12
Cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) based on 12-month average CPI for periods February 2011 - February 2012 and
February 2012 - February 2013.
November-12
December-12
January-13
February-13
12-month average
August-12
1.60%215.133
Cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) based on 12-month average CPI for periods February 2010 - February 2011 and
February 2011 - February 2012.
February-11
12-month average 12-month average
November-10
December-10
January-11
September-12
October-12
Cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) based on 12-month average CPI for periods February 2009 - February 2010 and
February 2010 - February 2011.
Month-Year
February-09
March-09
April-09
May-09
June-09
July-09
October-09
November-09
December-09
January-10
February-10
January-12
February-12
12-month average
Month-Year
April-12
May-12
June-12 COLA =230.070 - 225.644 =1.96%July-12 225.644
COLA =218.578 - 215.133 =
Month-Year
February-11
March-11
April-11
May-11
June-11 COLA =225.644 - 218.578 =3.23%July-11 225.644
August-11
September-11
October-11
November-11
December-11
CPI
232.166
232.773
232.531
232.945
233.504
233.596
233.877
234.149
233.546
233.069
233.049
233.916
234.781
233.377
CPI
234.781
236.293
237.072
237.900
238.343
238.250
237.852
238.031
237.433
236.151
234.812
233.707
234.722
236.565
CPI
234.722
236.119
236.599
237.805
238.638
238.654
238.316
237.945
237.838
237.336
236.525
236.916
237.111
237.271
Cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) based on 12-month average CPI for periods February 2012 - February 2013 and
February 2013 - February 2014.
1.44%July-13 COLA =233.377 - 230.070 =230.070
Month-Year
February-13
March-13
April-13
May-13
June-13
February-14
12-month average
Month-Year
February-14
March-14
Cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) based on 12-month average CPI for periods February 2013 - February 2014 and
February 2014 - February 2015.
1.37%July-14
August-13
September-13
October-13
November-13
December-13
January-14
COLA =236.565 - 233.377 =233.377
March-15
April-15
May-15
June-15
Month-Year
February-15
April-14
May-14
June-14
November-14
December-14
January-15
February-15
12-month average
Cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) based on 12-month average CPI for periods February 2014 - February 2015 and
February 2015 - February 2016.
August-14
September-14
October-14
February-16
12-month average
August-15
September-15
October-15
November-15
December-15
January-16
0.30%July-15 COLA =237.271 - 236.565 =236.565
CPI
237.111
238.132
239.261
240.229
241.018
240.628
240.849
241.428
241.729
241.353
241.432
242.839
243.603
240.739
CPI
243.603
243.801
244.524
244.733
244.955
244.786
245.519
246.819
246.663
246.669
246.524
247.867
248.991
245.804
CPI
248.991
249.554
250.546
251.588
251.989
252.006
252.146
252.439
252.885
252.038
251.233
251.712
252.776
251.531
Month-Year
February-16
March-16
Cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) based on 12-month average CPI for periods February 2015 - February 2016 and
February 2016 - February 2017.
1.46%July-16 COLA =240.739 - 237.271 =237.271
May-16
June-16
12-month average
June-18 COLA =251.531 - 245.804
August-18
September-18
July-17 240.739
August-17
September-17
October-17
November-17
December-17
July-18 245.804
January-18
February-18
12-month average
Cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) based on 12-month average CPI for periods February 2017 - February 2018 and
February 2018 - February 2019.
Month-Year
February-18
March-18
April-18
May-18
October-18
=2.33%
2.10%
April-16
November-18
December-18
January-19
February-19
August-16
September-16
October-16
November-16
December-16
January-17
February-17
12-month average
Cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) based on 12-month average CPI for periods February 2016 - February 2017 and
February 2017 - February 2018.
Month-Year
February-17
March-17
April-17
May-17
June-17 COLA =245.804 - 240.739 =
CPI
252.776
254.202
255.548
256.092
256.143
256.571
256.558
256.759
257.346
257.208
256.974
257.971
258.678
256.371
CPI
258.678
258.115
256.389
256.394
257.797
259.101
259.918
260.280
260.388
260.229
260.474
261.582
263.014
259.412
CPI
263.014
264.877
267.054
269.195
271.696
273.003
273.567
274.310
276.589
277.948
278.802
261.582
281.148
271.75312-month average
259.412
July-21
August-21
September-21
October-21
November-21
December-21
January-22
February-22
January-21
February-21
Cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) based on 12-month average CPI for between February 2021 and Feburary 2022
Month-Year
February-21
March-21
April-21
COLA ==
Cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) based on 12-month average CPI for between February 2020 and Feburary 2021
Month-Year
February-20
March-20
April-20
July-20 COLA ==1.19%
May-20
259.412 - 256.371
12-month average
June-20
August-20
September-20
October-20
November-20
December-20
256.371
4.76%May-21 271.753 - 259.412
June-21
August-19
September-19
October-19
November-19
December-19
January-20
February-20
12-month average
Cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) based on 12-month average CPI for periods February 2018 - February 2019 and
February 2019 - February 2020
Month-Year
February-19
March-19
April-19
May-19
June-19 COLA =256.371 - 251.531 =1.92%July-19 251.531
CPI
283.716
287.504
289.109
292.296
296.311
296.276
296.171
296.808
298.012
297.711
296.797
299.17
300.84
294.671
CPI
300.84
301.836
303.363
304.127
305.109
305.691
307.026
307.789
307.671
304.828
Long Term Care Fund based on a base of $250,000 adjusted by:
307.671
62.9
Cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) based on 12-month average CPI for between February 2022 and Feburary 2023
CPI-U October 2023
Month-Year
February-22
March-22
April-22
COLA ==8.43%May-22 294.671 - 271.753
June-22 271.753
July-22
August-22
September-22
October-22
November-22
December-22
January-23
February-23
12-month average
Month-Year
CPI-U February 1978
= $250,000 * 4.891= $1,223,858$250,000 *
COLA ==3.45%304.473 - 294.671
294.671March-23
April-23
May-23
June-23
July-23
August-23
September-23
9-month average
February-23
October-23
Cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) based on 8-month average CPI for between February 2023 and September 2023
Data extracted on: October 30, 2023
CPI-All Urban Consumers (Current Series)
Series Id: CUUR0000SA0
Not Seasonally Adjusted
Area: U.S. city average
Item: All items
Base Period: 1982-84=100
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2007 202.416 203.499 205.352 206.686 207.949 208.352 208.299 207.917 208.49 208.936 210.177 210.036
2008 211.08 211.693 213.528 214.823 216.632 218.815 219.964 219.086 218.783 216.573 212.425 210.228
2009 211.143 212.193 212.709 213.24 213.856 215.693 215.351 215.834 215.969 216.177 216.33 215.949
2010 216.687 216.741 217.631 218.009 218.178 217.965 218.011 218.312 218.439 218.711 218.803 219.179
2011 220.223 221.309 223.467 224.906 225.964 225.722 225.922 226.545 226.889 226.421 226.23 225.672
2012 226.665 227.663 229.392 230.085 229.815 229.478 229.104 230.379 231.407 231.317 230.221 229.601
2013 230.28 232.166 232.773 232.531 232.945 233.504 233.596 233.877 234.149 233.546 233.069 233.049
2014 233.916 234.781 236.293 237.072 237.9 238.343 238.25 237.852 238.031 237.433 236.151 234.812
2015 233.707 234.722 236.119 236.599 237.805 238.638 238.654 238.316 237.945 237.838 237.336 236.525
2016 236.916 237.111 238.132 239.261 240.229 241.018 240.628 240.849 241.428 241.729 241.353 241.432
2017 242.839 243.603 243.801 244.524 244.733 244.955 244.786 245.519 246.819 246.663 246.669 246.524
2018 247.867 248.991 249.554 250.546 251.588 251.989 252.006 252.146 252.439 252.885 252.038 251.233
2019 251.712 252.776 254.202 255.548 256.092 256.143 256.571 256.558 256.759 257.346 257.208 256.974
2020 257.971 258.678 258.115 256.389 256.394 257.797 259.101 259.918 260.28 260.388 260.229 260.474
2021 261.582 263.014 264.877 267.054 269.195 271.696 273.003 273.567 274.31 276.589 277.948 278.802
2022 281.148 283.716 287.504 289.109 292.296 296.311 296.276 296.171 296.808 298.012 297.711 296.797
2023 299.17 300.84 301.836 303.363 304.127 305.109 305.691 307.026 307.789 307.671
Data extracted on: October 30, 2023
PPI Commodity Data
PPI Commodity data for Fuels and related products and power, not seasonally adjusted
Series Id: WPU05
Not Seasonally Adjusted
Group: Fuels and related products and power
Item: Fuels and related products and power
Base Date: 198200
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2014 209.8 216.4 218.9 219.6 219.1 220.9 218.6 215.4 212.2 199.7 190.3 177.2
2015 158.8 159.8 162.6 160.5 170.1 174.4 172.1 166.1 158.2 153.4 148.4 141.9
2016 136.4 130.9 134.1 137.7 144.3 152.1 153.8 150.8 153.4 154.0 149.3 154.8
2017 161.2 161.1 157.1 160.9 159.7 161.2 161.7 164.3 169.2 167.2 169.6 170.9
2018 174.4 177.2 172.0 176.0 184.5 188.0 189.4 187.3 188.4 190.0 179.4 172.7
2019 163.9 164.6 170.8 175.4 175.6 169.9 172.3 168.9 167.6 164.8 165.4 165.2
2020 164.0 155.0 143.2 117.4 125.4 137.3 144.4 147.5 147.7 146.4 151.0 157.0
2021 163.1 179.0 185.5 181.4 191.9 198.7 208.0 207.0 212.7 227.2 229.9 216.9
2022 226.8 244.9 261.6 271.0 296.4 326.0 295.3 286.9 283.9 275.2 263.4 242.8
2023 250.8 244.5 236.2 233.7 222.9 225.6 230.0 248.7 254.5 241.3
P : Preliminary. All indexes are subject to revision four months after original publication.
RADIATION SCAN SURVEY EQUIPMENT
Number Instrument
Instrument
Cost ea.
Rental
Cost (per
month)1
Annual
Rental Cost Probe
Probe Cost
ea.
Rental Cost
(per
month)1
Annual
Rental Cost Rental Total
Purchase
total
3 Model 3 582.00$ 115.00$ 4,140.00$ 44-9 231.00$ 30.00$ 1,080.00$ 5,220.00$ 2,439.00$ Measurement of total contamination alpha, beta, and gamma
2 Model 19 1,371.00$ 100.00$ 2,400.00$ NA NA NA 2,400.00$ 2,742.00$ Gamma µR/hr survey meter
2 Model 2221 2,389.00$ 190.00$ 4,560.00$ 44-10 1,039.00$ 100.00$ 2,400.00$ 6,960.00$ 6,856.00$ Scaler/Ratemeter with gamma scintillation detector/probe
3 Model 177 1,156.00$ 75.00$ 2,700.00$ 43-5 758.00$ 60.00$ 2,160.00$ 4,860.00$ 5,742.00$ Personnel frisking devisces for alpha contamination
1 Model 3030 (3000)3,602.00$ 190.00$ 2,280.00$ NA NA NA 2,280.00$ 3,602.00$ Sample Counter dual channel for alpha and beta/gamma
1 Model 2000 (2360)1,513.00$ 140.00$ 1,680.00$ 43-10 1,231.00$ 100.00$ 1,200.00$ 2,880.00$ 2,744.00$ Back-up for the Model 3030 with alpha sample counter
4 Personnel sample pumps 1,200.00$ 200.00$ 9,600.00$ NA NA NA 9,600.00$ 4,800.00$ Air sampling pumps for Breathing zone samples
3 Check sources 1,500.00$ 450.00$ 16,200.00$ NA NA NA 16,200.00$ 4,500.00$ Radiological instrument checks sources Th-230, Sr-90 and Cs-137
1 Pump Calibrator 1,500.00$ 200.00$ 2,400.00$ NA NA NA 2,400.00$ 1,500.00$ Calibration device for the personnel air sampling pumps
1 Calibrations 2,400.00$ 400.00$ 4,800.00$ NA NA NA 4,800.00$ 2,400.00$ Calibration of 12 radiation detection instruments at $200 each 1/yr
1 Misc 5,598.75$ 8,640.00$ NA NA NA 8,640.00$ 5,598.75$ Includes a 15% contigency for supplies and repairs per year
-$
TOTAL 66,240.00$ 42,923.75$
Instrument Description

SHOOTARING CANYON
URANIUM MILLING FACILITY
GROUNDWATER MONITORING
SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN

UTAH GROUNDWATER QUALITY DISCHARGE PERMIT UGW170003
UTAH RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS LICENSE UT 0900480

10808 S. River Front Parkway
Suite 321
South Jordan, Utah 84095

March 2024
Revision 2

Prepared By
Wright Environmental Services, Inc.
226 Peterson Street
Fort Collins, CO 80524

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

i | ii pages Groundwater Monitoring SAP, Rev. 1
March 2024

SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM MILL FACILITY
GROUNDWATER MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN
Revision Summary

Revision Date Status
Original May, 2013 Draft
Revision 1 October, 2014 Revised Draft
Revision 1 June 2017 Revised
Revision 2 March 2024 Revised Draft

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

ii | ii pages Groundwater Monitoring SAP, Rev. 1
March 2024

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................1
1.1 Regulatory Basis ........................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Purpose and Objective .................................................................................................. 1
2.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING .................................................................................3
2.1 Monitoring Wells .......................................................................................................... 3
2.2 Sample Procedures ........................................................................................................ 4
2.3 Sample Frequency ......................................................................................................... 4
2.4 Field Parameters............................................................................................................ 4
2.4 Groundwater Quality Parameters .................................................................................. 5
2.5 Data Reduction, Validation and Documentation .......................................................... 6
3.0 REPORTING ......................................................................................................................7
3.1 Reporting Schedule ............................................................................................................. 7
3.2 Routine Reporting Requirements ........................................................................................ 7
3.3 Non-Routine Reporting Requirements ............................................................................... 8
3.3.1 Possible Out-of-Compliance Status Reporting ................................................. 8
3.3.2 Confirmed Out-of-Compliance Status Reporting ............................................. 8
4.0 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................9

TABLES

Table 2-1 Summary of Compliance Monitoring Wells and Data Collection .............................. 11
Table 2-2 Facility Well Construction Summary ......................................................................... 12
Table 2-3 Compliance Monitoring Program Groundwater Analyses ......................................... 13

FIGURES
Figure 2-1 Groundwater Monitoring Wells - Operations
Figure 2-2 Groundwater Monitoring Wells - Post-Operations
Figure 3-1 Groundwater Monitoring Compliance Decision Flow Chart

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment A Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan
Attachment B Groundwater Sampling Data Form
Attachment C Field Instrument Calibration Form

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

1 | 8 pages Groundwater Monitoring SAP, Rev. 1
March 2024

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This sampling and analysis plan (SAP) addresses current and potential future post-closure
groundwater monitoring at the Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility (Facility). It should be
recognized that post-closure groundwater monitoring will be established by the State of Utah in
consultation with the long-term custodian for this Facility under Title II of the Uranium Mill Tailings
Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) of 1978.

1.1 Regulatory Basis

The conditions of Utah Ground Water Quality Discharge Permit UGW170003 (Permit) require routine
groundwater compliance monitoring including sampling and water level measurements from
groundwater monitoring wells in accordance with the Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance
Plan (QAP), which is included as Attachment A to this Sampling and Analysis Plan.

1.2 Purpose and Objective

The purpose of this groundwater monitoring Sampling and Analysis Plan is to identify the operating
and post-closure groundwater monitoring program for the Facility. This Sampling and Analysis Plan
identifies the following:

• the wells to be sampled;
• the field parameters to be measured;
• the analytes to be measured; and
• the sampling frequency.

This Sampling and Analysis Plan incorporates quality assurance (QA) elements derived from the
approved QAP and describes the following:

• field sample collection methods
• sample handling
• analytical methods

The objective of this Sampling and Analysis Plan is to ensure sample collection and handling actions
for the samples to reach the laboratory such that the data produced are valid, reliable and accurately
represent the existing chemical and physical conditions of the Entrada Sandstone aquifer beneath the
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

2 | 8 pages Groundwater Monitoring SAP, Rev. 1
March 2024

Facility. Laboratory and internal QA processes are addressed in the QAP, included as A ttachment A
to this Sampling and Analysis Plan.

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

3 | 8 pages Groundwater Monitoring SAP, Rev. 1
March 2024

2.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING

2.1 Monitoring Wells

Table 2-1 summarizes the wells to be monitored for the Facility compliance groundwater monitoring
program and the sampling frequency as per Groundwater Discharge Permit UGW170003. Point of
Compliance (POC) groundwater monitoring wells for the period of operations as follows (see Figure
2-1):

• POC 1 through POC 5 for the tailings storage facility
• POC 6 through POC 8 for the process ponds

Upon Facility decommissioning and reclamation, the process ponds will be removed, and wells POC
6 through POC 8 will be abandoned. The tailings embankment will be regraded to a 5 horizontal:1
vertical slope as outlined the approved Decomissioning and Reclamation Plan, which will require the
abandonment of wells POC 3 and POC 4. Two additional POC groundwater monitoring wells (POC
9 and POC 10) are proposed for the post-operations period prior to Utah Radioactive Materials License
UT 0900480 (License) termination to be placed just beyond the limits of the reclaimed tailings
embankment (see Figure 2-2). Wells POC 9 and POC 10 would be installed prior to abandonment of
wells POC 3 and POC 4 to allow for overlapping groundwater quality data from all POC wells. RM2R
will be abandoned after operations.

All POC wells are screened in the uppermost aquifer, which is hosted by the Entrada Sandstone. These
wells include:

• upgradient groundwater well to act as an observation point for large scale upgradient
groundwater quality trends that are not related to Facility activities but that could potentially
impact site groundwater quality over time; and
• point of compliance (POC) groundwater monitoring points for assessing the tailings storage
facility performance for protecting groundwater quality with respect to groundwater compliance
limits; and
• operational groundwater monitoring wells for assessment of groundwater quality with respect to
potential operational sources (e.g., ore stockpile).

Table 2-2 summarizes the location and well construction details of each well in the monitoring
program. Generally, the POC wells will have 50 feet long screens that span the groundwater table in
the uppermost aquifer. Following Facility decommissioning and reclamation it is anticipated that the
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

4 | 8 pages Groundwater Monitoring SAP, Rev. 1
March 2024

operational monitoring point, RM2R, will be removed from the program as the ore stockpile and all
contaminated soil will have been removed. It is anticipated that background groundwater monitoring
location RM1 will remain in the groundwater monitoring program.

2.2 Sample Procedures

The Permit compliance groundwater monitoring program will consist of groundwater depth
measurement and sample collection semi-annually for a short list of parameters and sampled annually
for the long list of parameters (Table 2-3) from ten wells and annually from the Tailings Sump (Table
2-2).

All wells will be sampled according to the procedures in the QAP and Standard Operating Procedure
(SOP) EP-1 (Groundwater Sampling). All sampling will be with dedicated submersible pumps, unless
mechanical failure requires an alternate sampling method, such as manual bailing. All purging and
sampling equipment that comes in contact with the sampled groundwater will either be dedicated to a
particular well or used only once (disposable). The submersible pumps will all be dedicated to a single
well and single-use filters will be used for each sample for each well. The wetted materials (materials
that come into direct contact with the purge or sample water) used will be PVC, polyethylene,
polypropylene, Teflon, Noryl, nylon, rubber, rubber, stainless steel, nickel, or aluminum.

2.3 Sample Frequency

Table 2-1 presents the sampling frequency for each location. Based on calculated groundwater flow
velocities for the Entrada Sandstone, which are on average for the Facility on the order of 5 to 10
feet/year (WES, 2013), a semi-annual sampling frequency for all wells will be adequate to promptly
identify water quality changes without sampling too frequently and sampling the same water as the
previous event.

Wells and locations identified in Table 2-1 are to be sampled semi-annually for a short list of
parameters (chloride, selenium, sulfate, and uranium) and sampled annually for the long list of
parameters (Table 2-3).

2.4 Field Parameters

The required field parameters for measurement prior to and during sampling are identified in Table 2-
3 and include static groundwater levels, pH, temperature, and conductivity. All field measurements
and field sampling activities, including anomalous or upset conditions, will be recorded on the
Groundwater Sampling Data Form (Attachment B). Static groundwater levels will be measured in all
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

5 | 8 pages Groundwater Monitoring SAP, Rev. 1
March 2024

program wells prior to well purging and sampling. The depth to groundwater from the marked and
surveyed measurement point on each well will be recorded to the nearest 1/100 th of a foot.

The pH, temperature, and conductivity meter will be calibrated as per the manufacturer’s directions
and the calibration documented on the Field Instrument Calibration Form (Attachment C). A function
check of the field meters will be performed immediately prior to sampling each well to verify meter
function as per the SOP.

To ensure that groundwater samples are representative of the aquifer, specific conductivity and pH
will be monitored during presampling purging using a flow cell inserted into the flow line from the
well pumping device to measure the field stabilization parameters for all pumped wells. Temperature
readings will also be recorded, but not used as a stabilization criterion due to the influence of heat
from the submersible pumps. To show that the groundwater is stable, three consecutive sets of
groundwater stabilization parameters must met the following criteria:

• pH = ± 0.1 units
• Specific conductivity = ± 10 percent

From the measured groundwater level, a casing volume will be calculated as outlined in the standard
operating procedure EP-1 to ensure that the amount for minimal well purging is known prior to sample
collection. If possible, at least one well casing volume will be purged and field parameters recorded
for stability. If the stabilization parameters have not been met after one casing volume has been
removed and it is possible to continue pumping, the purging should continue until stabilization is
demonstrated or it is no longer possible to continue purging. If it is not possible to continue pumping
and stabilization has not occurred, or if stabilization criteria have been met, but the well is pumped
dry before a complete sample can be collected, the process described in the EPA RCRA Groundwater
Monitoring Technical Enforcement Guidance Document (September 1986), Section 4.2.3 will be
followed. This requires that the well should be evacuated to dryness once. Stabilization parameter
readings should be recorded during this purging and then the well(s) should be sampled as soon as the
well recovers sufficiently to provide adequate sample volume. Additional detail for this process is
provided in the groundwater sampling standard operating procedure EP-1.

2.4 Groundwater Quality Parameters

Groundwater quality samples shall be collected after adequate purging is completed and field
parameters measured. Wells and locations identified in Table 2-1 are to be sampled semi-annually for
a short list of parameters and sampled annually for the long list of parameters (Table 2-3). Table 2-3
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

6 | 8 pages Groundwater Monitoring SAP, Rev. 1
March 2024

identifies the water quality parameters, the appropriate analytical methods and reporting limits, as well
as the groundwater compliance limits set forth in the Permit, sample holding times, and sample
preservation methods. The laboratory performing the analysis will follow their procedures for
precision, accuracy, representativeness, comparability , and completeness as per State of Utah and/or
National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference (NELAC ) Certification.

All samples will be field filtered to 0.45µm with single-use disposable filters. Sample containers, will
be labeled, filled, preserved and handled as outlined in standard operating proceudre EP-1. A blind
field duplicate will be collected at least once per sampling event as a QA/Q uality Control (QC) sample.
Samples will be packed into coolers having ice, ice packs , or both as well as completed laboratory
chain-of-custody forms. A custody seal will be applied to each cooler prior to release from the sampler
to a shipping service. Seals are not required for individual bottles. All samples will be shipped with
overnight express to ensure samples that have temperature requirements remain below 6oC and holding
times are met or hand delivered to the laboratory.

2.5 Data Reduction, Validation and Documentation

All data generated during this program will be reviewed under the direction of Anfield’s Radiation
Safety Officer or designee (RSO). All laboratory data will be validated as per the QAP and assessed
for completeness and anomalies by tabulating and plotting the data. Communications with the
laboratory regarding problems or errors and associated remedies and/or corrective actions will be
documented. Field QA issues, such as improper chain-of-custody issues, missed holding times, or
lab QA/QC failures, such as lab QA failure (e.g., blank samples with detected values, relative percent
differences or percent recovery values for QC samples outside of performance ranges, etc.) will be
addressed on a case by case basis consistent with the QAP.

Groundwater Compliance
Monitoring System Design
Shootaring Canyon Mill
Tailings Disposal Facility

Prepared For:

3346 West Guadalupe Road
Apache Junction, AZ 85120

Prepared By:

155 E. Boardwalk Drive #537
Fort Collins, CO 80525

May 19, 2017

ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Tables ............................................................................................................................................. iii
Figures............................................................................................................................................ iv
Appendices ..................................................................................................................................... iv
1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1
2.0 Site HYDROGEOLOGIC Conceptual Model ..................................................................... 3
2.1 Hydrogeology ................................................................................................................... 3
2.1.1 Regional Geologic discussion ................................................................................... 3
2.1.2 Site Hydrogeology .................................................................................................... 3
2.2 Groundwater flow ............................................................................................................ 6
3.0 Groundwater Model ............................................................................................................. 8
3.1 Model Design ................................................................................................................... 8
3.2 Hydrogeologic Parameters ............................................................................................... 8
3.2.1 Hydraulic Conductivity (K) ...................................................................................... 8
3.2.2 Specific Yield............................................................................................................ 9
3.2.3 Recharge ................................................................................................................. 10
3.2.4 General Head Boundary Conditions (GHB) ........................................................... 10
3.2.5 Dispersivity ............................................................................................................. 10
3.3 Flow Model Calibration ................................................................................................. 10
3.4 Calibrated Parameters .................................................................................................... 11
3.5 Model Calibration Results .............................................................................................. 12
3.6 MT3D Modeling ............................................................................................................ 12
3.7 Stochastic Model ............................................................................................................ 14
3.7.1 Stochastic Groundwater Modeling Results ............................................................. 15
3.8 Particle Tracking Model ................................................................................................. 15
4.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM ............................................................. 17
5.0 References .......................................................................................................................... 18
6.0 Figures................................................................................................................................ 19
7.0 Appendix I Perched water table Flux Calculations............................................................ 20
8.0 Appendix II GHB Parameters ........................................................................................... 23

iii

TABLES
Table 2-1 Data used for EVS Conceptual Model ........................................................................... 4
Table 3-1 Aquifer Test Results from RM15 Multi-Well Pump Test and Single
Well Pump Tests ....................................................................................................................... 9
Table 3-2 Comparison of 2003, 2008 and 2017 Groundwater Elevations .................................. 11
Table 3-3 Calibrated Model Parameters ....................................................................................... 12
Table 3-4 Flow Model Calibration Statistics ................................................................................ 13
Table 3-5 Parameters Used in the Stochastic Flow and Transport Model .................................... 14
Table 4-1 Monitoring Well Locations .......................................................................................... 17
iv

FIGURES
Figure 1 General Site Location
Figure 2 Site Location Map
Figure 3 Local Site Location Geologic Map
Figure 4 Monitoring Well and Cross-Section Location Map
Figure 5 Tailings Pond Liner Detail
Figure 6 Geologic Type Section of Colorado Plateau Sediments
Figure 7 Geologic Cross-Section 1-1’
Figure 8 Geologic Cross-Section 2-2’
Figure 9 Geologic Cross-Section 3-3’
Figure 10 EVS Model Top of Model Showing Uppermost Entrada
Figure 11 EVS Model - Uppermost Low Conductivity Zone
Figure 12 EVS Model – Uppermost Low Conductivity Zone Removed
Figure 13 EVS Model – Deep Lower Conductivity Zone
Figure 14 EVS Model- Deep Lower Conductivity Zone Removed
Figure 15 North – South Cross Section of Conceptual Model
Figure 16 2003 Measured Groundwater Elevations
Figure 17 Perched Groundwater Table
Figure 18 Model Domain
Figure 19 Dispersion Estimation
Figure 20 Model Layer 4 Hydraulic Conductivity
Figure 21 Model Layers 5 Through 10 Hydraulic Conductivity
Figure 22 General Head Boundary Locations
Figure 23 Calibrated Modeling Results
Figure 24 Cross Sectional View of Modeled Plume – Column 48
Figure 25 Modeled Versus Measured Heads
Figure 26 Stochastic Modeling Results
Figure 27 Probability of Exceeding 1.0 µg/L After 100 Years
Figure 28 Proposed Groundwater Monitoring Wells
Figure 29 Particle Tracking Results

APPENDICES
Appendix I Perched Water Table Flux Calculations

Appendix II General Head Boundary Data

Appendix III Groundwater Flow and Transport Modeling Electronic Files (DVD)
1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This report presents the design basis for a proposed groundwater compliance monitoring system
at the Shootaring Canyon Mill Site (Site) located 48 miles south of Hanksville, Utah, and just
north of Ticaboo, UT. The site location map is displayed in Figures 1 through 3. The principal
purpose of this report is to provide the technical basis for a groundwater compliance monitoring
system for the proposed new tailings disposal facility at the Site. The objective of this
groundwater compliance monitoring system is to provide prompt detection of potential changes
in groundwater quality in the event that the primary groundwater protection system, the tailings
facility multiple liner and monitoring systems to perform as designed. This groundwater
protection monitoring system will be used to evaluate compliance with State groundwater
protection requirements as stated in the Ground Water Quality Discharge Permit UGW170003
and to ensure that the uppermost aquifer is protected to the maximum extent feasible, as
stipulated in UAC R317-6-4.

The mill was commissioned and operated for four months in 1982 before being mothballed due
to declining uranium prices. It has been on care and maintenance since that time. Permitting is
currently underway to restart the mill. As part of the process, a new tailings disposal facility is
proposed. The new proposed tailings disposal facility, consisting of two 40 acre cells, will be
located directly west of the Shootaring Canyon Mill as shown on Figure 4. Figure 4 also defines
three cross-sections locations that will be discussed later in this report. The new tailings disposal
facility has been designed and, once the design and associated license amendment to return to
operations is approved, will be constructed and operated according to the approved best
management practices. The southern tailings cell would be constructed first, allowing placement
of the limited existing tailings and contaminated soils, currently located in the northern tailings
impoundment area, into the southern cell. The northern tailings cell would be constructed later in
the project. The tailings disposal facility liner consists of a triple lined system with three major
components, a) a leachate collection system that limits tailings fluid head on the primary
geosynthetic membrane liner, b) the leak detection system underlies the leachate collection
system which allows for prompt detection of potential leakage and removal of the leachate to
maintain minimal head on the secondary geosynthetic membrane liner and c) a third liner of
compacted clay that underlies the leak detection system and secondary liner that has low
permeability and self-healing characteristics to supplement the primary and secondary liners.
Figure 5 illustrates the proposed liner configuration.

The system of multiple liners, with the associated operation and monitoring programs in leachate
collection and leak detection system comprises the primary groundwater protection system for
operation of the tailings disposal facility. The complete discussion of the design and leak
detection monitoring system for the proposed tailings disposal facility, is presented in (Uranium
One, 2008).

The design of the groundwater monitoring system has relied on data collected from previous
investigations, primarily the Ground-water Monitoring of Shootaring Canyon Tailings, Hydro-
2

Engineering, 2006 and Ground-water Hydrology of Shootaring Canyon Tailings, Hydro-
Engineering, 1998. The data analysis included evaluation of monitoring wells at the site.
Driller’s logs alone were insufficient to make detailed geologic picks; therefore, only wells with
geophysical neutron logs were used in the interpretation. Neutron logs respond primarily to the
amount of hydrogen in the formation. Hydrogen is contained in oil, natural gas, and water, and
is used to identify zones of differing porosity. In sediments of the same relative age and
depositional environment, the interpreted porosity can be used to infer grain size. Coarse grained
deposits typically contain more effective interconnected pore space whereas finer grained
deposits have more total porosity but much less of the porosity is interconnected pore space and
therefore there is less effective porosity. The greater response on the neutron density log
indicates higher water content. In general, this greater neutron density at this facility response
indicates a sandstone unit. The interpreted logs were used to develop a three-dimensional
geologic model that could be used with confidence to evaluate the groundwater flow at the
facility.

This monitoring plan describes the site hydrogeologic conceptual model based on interpretation
of existing site data. Using these data and the site conceptual model, a numerical groundwater
flow and transport model has been developed. This model is used to evaluate the flow and
transport of potential tailings fluids as a basis for the design of the groundwater monitoring
network. In addition, this modeling has been used to assess the need for additional
characterization of the site hydrogeologic conditions to confirm or supplement the existing
hydrogeologic conceptual model.

3

2.0 SITE HYDROGEOLOGIC CONCEPTUAL MODEL
Conceptual models form the basis for investigation of field observations and laboratory data.
Further, the conceptual model will be used to develop a groundwater flow and transport model.
The characteristics of the site hydrogeologic conceptual model are described in Sections 2.1
through 2.3.
2.1 Hydrogeology
2.1.1 Regional Geologic discussion
The Shootaring Mill Site is located in the Colorado Plateau physiographic province. The
geologic column for the Province is illustrated in Figure 6. The Entrada Sandstone and
underlying Carmel Formation are middle Jurassic in age. The Navajo Sandstone, which under
lies the Carmel Formation, is early Jurassic in age. The average surface elevation of the site is
approximately 4,400 feet above mean sea level (amsl). The site is underlain by unconsolidated
alluvium and indurated sedimentary rocks consisting primarily of sandstone and shale. The
indurated rocks are relatively flat lying with dips generally less than 3°. The alluvial materials
consist mostly of aeolian silts and fine-grained aeolian sands with a thickness varying from a few
feet to as much as 25 to 30 feet across the site. The alluvium is underlain by the Entrada
Sandstone and Carmel Formation. The Entrada Sandstone typically consists of both marine and
windblown, moderately to well indurated sediments.

At the Site, the Entrada Sandstone is about 400 feet thick. Below the Entrada Sandstone lies the
Carmel Formation consisting of interbedded limestones, sandstones, siltstones and mudstones.
The Carmel Formation was deposited in a near shore marine environment that typically ranges
from 200 to 1,000 feet thick. The Navajo Sandstone is situated beneath the Carmel Formation
and is considered isolated from the overlying Entrada by the thickness and low conductivity of
the Carmel Formation (Hydro Engineering, 1998, 2006).

2.1.2 Site Hydrogeology
The site hydrogeologic conceptual model is based upon geologic and geophysical logs collected
during previous site investigations (Hydro Engineering, 1998, 2006). Seventeen groundwater
monitoring wells with accompanying geophysical logs from the following wells were used to
develop the conceptual geologic model. These wells include RM16, RM11, RM4, RM5, RM15,
RM6, RM13, RM-3, RM-14, RM-19, RM7, RM18, RM12, RM9, RM20, RM1 and RM12 (See
Figure 4). Table 2-1 summarized the interpreted bottom elevations of each hydrogeologic unit or
subunit. Figures 7, 8 and 9 present geologic cross sections originally presented in Hydro-
Engineering, 2006, and include well and geophysical log details.

The Shootaring Canyon Mill tailings disposal facility will be located on either exposed Entrada
Sandstone or a thin veneer of loose fluvial and aeolian sediments lying directly on Entrada
Sandstone. The unconsolidated sediments are comprised of sands derived from weathered
Entrada Sandstone and unconsolidated to poorly consolidated windblown sediments. These
sediments are situated well above the first encountered groundwater and are not part of the
Entrada Sandstone.
4

Table 2-1 Data used for EVS Conceptual Model
Well Eastin Northing Surface Entrada1 Upper Entrada2 Lower Entrada3
Name g Elevation Low K Low K
RM4 61099 56472 4395.5 4365.5 4343.5 4235.5 4155.5 3995.5
RM9 61363 56767 4369.31 4288.31 4284.31 4248.31 4189.31 3969.31
RM20 61592 57208 4380.83 4290.83 4286.83 4220.83 pinched out 3980.83
RM2 63040 57731 4519.76 4399.76 4369.76 4311.76 4219.76 4119.76
RM1 61827 59307 4449.2 4303.2 4285.2 4257.2 4225.2 4049.2
RM11 60769 56594 4436.14 4356.14 pinched out 4256.14 4206.14 4036.14
RM13 61996 56648 4434.81 4334.81 pinched out 4234.81 pinched out 4034.81
RM14 61368 58419 4450.84 4400.84 pinched out 4260.84 pinched out 4050.84
RM15 61354 56311 4343.75 4283.75 pinched out 4235.75 4059.75 3943.75
RM19 61524 58077 4409.5 4379.5 pinched out 4261.5 pinched out 4009.5
RM3 60647 57193 4461.32 4361.32 pinched out 4245.32 pinched out 4061.32
RM5 61286 56416 4379.12 4359.12 pinched out 4273.12 4189.12 3979.12
RM6 61481 56348 4374.57 4339.57 pinched out 4234.57 4174.57 3974.57
RM7 61645 57904 4395.86 4379.86 pinched out 4255.86 pinched out 3995.86
RM18 61851 57833 4421.56 4381.56 pinched out 4261.56 pinched out 4021.56
Notes:
Elevations are for the bottom of the surface
Low K = Low Permeability

These unconsolidated sediments are underlain by the Entrada Sandstone. The Entrada Sandstone,
which underlies all of the mill facilities and the tailings disposal facility, is a member of the San
Rafael Group and contains the first occurrence of groundwater and the uppermost aquifer at the
site. The Entrada Sandstone consists primarily of uniform fine-grained sandstone with occasional
interbeds of shale and siltstone.

The measured variability of the Entrada Sandstone hydraulic conductivity is exhibited in Table
3-1. Pumping tests at the site have demonstrated hydraulic conductivities that range from 0.02 to
6.28 feet per day. In the vicinity of the mill and tailings disposal cell, the Entrada Sandstone
exhibits two localized lower permeability sandstone subunits of the Entrada (Hydro Engineering,
1998). These localized subunits are discontinuous across the site domain and are important
because the lower permeability may influence the local groundwater flow beneath the site.
These localized and discontinuous subunits of the Entrada Sandstone appear to have lower
permeability relative to the bulk of the Entrada Sandstone based on the interpretation of the
neutron logs (Hydro Engineering 2006). Although these subunits have a slightly different
geophysical character than the bulk of the Entrada Sandstone, they are believed to have been
produced by small variations in depositional environment that resulted in a finer grain size
distribution and are considered as part of the Entrada Sandstone.

The presence of finer grained sandstone subunits has been interpreted principally from the
character of the geophysical neutron logs and the results of a limited number of single well
pumping tests. The hydrogeologic character of the finer grained unit is apparently variable
5

within the subunit as interpreted by the range of hydraulic conductivity values (0.02 feet per day
to 0.06 feet per day) as measured from the single well pumping tests (Hydro Engineering, 2006).
The data from RM9 represent the best available estimation of the hydraulic conductivity for the
upper subunit, 0.06 feet per day, because the well is screened only in the upper low permeability
sandstone subunit. No pump test data isolating only the lower sandstone subunit is available.
The lower permeability nature of the lower subunit is assumed to be based on interpretation of
similar neutron geophysical log signatures with the upper low permeability subunit.

Figure 4 defines the locations for three cross-sections developed by Hydro Engineering (Hydro
Engineering, 1998; 2006). Figure 7 represents the geologic cross-section 1-1’. The cross-section
is located south of the tailings storage facility dam and is oriented in an east-west direction. The
cross-section illustrates the presence of both the upper and lower low permeability sandstone
subunits in this area. Although present, the upper sandstone subunit is not saturated at this
location, is limited in extent and is observed and only two wells, RM4 and RM5. The lower low
permeability sandstone subunit is present in RM11, RM4, RM5 and RM15 but is absent in RM6
and RM13. This subunit is saturated or nearly saturated in the four wells where it was
encountered.

Figure 8 depicts the cross-section 2-2’. The cross-section extends along the western side of the
tailings ponds to RM14. The cross-section then is extended eastward to the east side of the
tailings impoundment. No low permeability sandstone subunits, either in the upper and lower
portions of the Entrada Sandstone were identified on this cross-section.

Figure 9 presents the geologic cross-section 3-3’ (see Figure 4 for location of this cross section)
which runs from the Shootaring Dam through the cross valley berm to the two upgradient wells,
RM1 and RM12. This cross-section is also presented in Figure 15 as a fence diagram through the
EVS conceptual model. Interpretation of the site geophysical logs indicates a localized lower
permeability subunit or zone in the upper portion (above the water table of the uppermost
aquifer) of the Entrada Sandstone with limited lateral extent in the area of the Shootaring Canyon
Dam. These geophysical logs and cross sections demonstrate that the low permeability zone
forms a localized perched water condition identified in wells RM8 and RM9.

Well and geophysical data show this upper low permeability zone and perched water condition
does not have significant lateral extent. Specifically, the shallow low permeability zone and
perched water condition identified in locations RM8/RM20, RM4, RM5 and RM9 is not present
in the following locations.

• On the Western margins of the tailings impoundment area:
Locations RM3 and RM14 as shown in Figure 8
Location RM11 as shown in Figure 7

• To the North along the Cross Valley Berm:
Locations RM14, RM19, RM7, RM18 and RM2 as shown on Figure 8

• On the Eastern margins of the tailings impoundment area:
Location RM13 as shown in Figure 7
6

Location RM2 as shown in Figure 8

• At or below the Shootaring Dam:
Locations RM11, RM15, RM6 as shown on Figure 7

Figures 10 through 16 show the resulting geologic conceptual model. Figures 11 and 13 illustrate
the limited location and extent of these low permeability sandstone subunits. These subunits are
identified in this report as the upper and lower low permeability zones. Where the upper subunit
is identified in locations RM4 and RM5 near the Shootaring Dam, it is not saturated. The dip of
the localized upper subunit is to the north with the top elevation approximately 4380 feet above
mean sea level (AMSL) near the embankment and approximately 4290 feet AMSL in locations
RM8 and RM9. It should also be noted that the extension of the low permeability zone identified
in locations RM4 and RM5 near the Shootaring Dam is very near the pre-embankment ground
surface while the Entrada aquifer water table surface is more than 100 feet below the ground
surface, therefore, data from locations RM8 and RM9 and the geophysical log of RM20
represent a distinct and localized condition, both hydro geologically and geochemically from that
of the main Entrada aquifer.

The Carmel Formation is present beneath the Entrada Sandstone and consists of interbedded
limestones, sandstones, siltstones and mudstones. The Carmel Formation is approximately 160
feet thick beneath the Shootaring Canyon Mill site and acts as an aquitard between the overlying
Entrada Sandstone aquifer and the underlying Navajo Sandstone aquifer. The top of the Carmel
Formation is considered the base of the uppermost aquifer system at the Site. Although the
Navajo Sandstone underlies the Carmel Formation, it is considered isolated form site activities
by the Carmel Formation because of the great difference (200 feet) between water levels in the
Entrada and Navajo sandstones. The Carmel Formation is interpreted to be greater than 200 feet
thick (Gregory, 1938) and exhibits very low hydraulic permeability Carmel Formation (Hydro-
Engineering, 1998). These factors maintain a significant isolation of the two sandstone aquifers.

As mentioned previously, 17 wells were used to generate the conceptual geologic model. Data
from these wells were interpreted and entered into the three-dimensional modeling software
called EVS. EVS allows the data to be interpreted between the monitoring wells and presented
in a block three-dimensional model. The model can be viewed in section and the conceptual
model data checked to ensure agreement with geologic concepts. The resulting conceptual
model as rendered by EVS is illustrated in Figures 10 through 16. These figures show the
resulting hydrogeologic unit surfaces at the Mill site. Figure 10 illustrates the entire three-
dimensional conceptual model. Each subsequent figure has a geologic layer removed, beginning
with removal of the uppermost layer. Figure 15 is a cross-sectional cut through the middle of the
model from north to south along cross-section 1-1’, illustrating the location of the low
permeability sandstone subunits.

2.2 Groundwater flow
The groundwater flow at Shootaring Mill was evaluated using well data collected during March
2003 because this period contained the most complete groundwater elevation data set. Many
wells that were geophysically logged and had recorded water levels were abandoned soon after
7

March 2003. However, groundwater elevations have remained relatively stable over the past 10
years and the March 2003 data are considered as reasonably representative of current conditions.
Table 3-2 summarizes the 2003 groundwater data and provides available 2008 and 2017data for
comparison. Figure 4 shows the monitoring well locations.

The 2003 groundwater elevation data in Table 3-2 have been contoured and the results shown in
Figure 16. The groundwater flow system in the uppermost aquifer at the Shootaring Canyon
Mill is relatively simple. Groundwater flow in the Entrada is generally from north to south,
following the footprint of the canyon floor. The notable exception to this flow regime is the
southeast component of flow in the eastern portion of the mill area. Evaluation of multi-well
permeability tests indicates a potential boundary condition or flow restriction east of the tailings
pond and south of the mill (Hydro Engineering, 2006). This restriction to flow is possibly a low
permeability zone in the sediments at that area.

The localized upper low permeability subunit of the Entrada Sandstone (Figure 11) creates the
perched water zone observed in wells RM8 and RM9 in the southern portion of the site at a depth
of approximately 75 feet below grade (fbg). Figure 17 depicts the extent of the upper low
permeability sandstone subunit as well as the elevation and location of the perched water.

Infiltration of meteoric waters from direct precipitation and infiltration of a portion of infrequent
surface flows down the drainage migrate vertically through the vadose zone or unsaturated
alluvial sediments and unsaturated Entrada Sandstone until it encounters the localized low
permeability sandstone subunit. Approximately 5.67 inches of precipitation per year fall at
Ticaboo, Utah (http://www.usclimatedata.com/climate/hanksville/utah/united-states/usut0101).
Experience has shown that about 10 to 20 percent of the rainfall or about 0.0001 to 0.0002 feet
per day is a reasonable approximation of recharge to the aquifer in southern Utah. The subunit
transmits water slower than the infiltration rate, which creates a perched saturated condition
above the uppermost aquifer water table.

This upper low permeability zone is interpreted to be lower in elevation at the limits of its
northern extent, south of wells RM7, RM14, RM 18, and RM19, than in its southern extent, in
Wells RM4 and RM5. The northern dip of this subunit allows much of the perched groundwater
to drain to the north from perched groundwater and subsequently vertically downward to the
main Entrada aquifer. Some groundwater flow is also expected to move vertically through the
siltstone at a low rate until it also reaches the main Entrada aquifer directly below this localized
low permeability zone. Figure 17 shows the interpreted upper low permeability zone and
associated perched groundwater elevations.

The Entrada aquifer is the uppermost aquifer beneath the mill and tailings disposal facility.
Within the Entrada Sandstone Aquifer is deeper, low permeability sandstone subunit located
toward the southern portion of the site a depth of 125 feet below ground level (Figure 11, Figure
13, and Figure 20). Although the subunit is described in the geologic logs and is confirmed in
the geophysical logs as a silty sandstone or siltstone, the lower permeability of the subunit does
not appear to significantly affect groundwater elevations.

8

3.0 GROUNDWATER MODEL
Groundwater Vistas, a graphical user interface (GUI) used to create MODFLOW and MT3DMS
model input files, was used to design the groundwater monitoring network, a simple three-
dimensional groundwater flow and transport model. The GUI used to generate the model files
was Groundwater Vistas (Rumbaugh and Rumbaugh, 2004). The groundwater model consists of
169 row and 129 columns spaced 25 feet apart. The model contains 10 layers each 50 feet thick.
Although the model simulates the conditions from surface to the base of the Entrada,
MODFLOW is incapable of simulating unsaturated flow (Harbaugh and MacDonald, 1994). The
perched groundwater was, therefore, not simulated in this model. The deeper, low permeability
sandstone subunit was simulated as saturated.

This model is used to develop a basis for designing the groundwater monitoring lateral well
spacing and vertical screen depths to ensure prompt detection of changes in groundwater quality
in the unlikely event that the multiple liner systems fail to perform as designed. No further
attempts were made to adjust the hydrogeologic parameters to obtain a better fit to observed data
than the adjustment to the constant heads.

The electronic Groundwater Vistas Files, MODFLOW-2000 files and the MT3DMS files for
calibration, transport estimates, stochastic modeling and MODPATH (simulations in this report
are contained on a DVD in Appendix III.

3.1 Model Design
The conceptual model described in section 2 was converted into a Modflow model. The model
domain was divided into 10 model layers each 50 foot thick. The top surface of the model was
assigned a value of 4400 feet above mean sea level on the bottom surface of the model was
assigned a value of 3900 feet above mean sea level. The domain was also subdivided into 169
rows and 129 columns each measuring 25 feet in length and width. The model domain is
provided in Figure 18.

3.2 Hydrogeologic Parameters
The following sections describe the model parameters used in the model and the basis for the
parameter value selection.
3.2.1 Hydraulic Conductivity (K)
Hydrogeologic parameters were estimated from pumping test collected during the Ground-water
Hydrology of Shootaring Canyon Tailings report data collection (Hydro-Engineering, 1998).
Table 3-1 is a summary of the pumping test results collected during the project. The hydraulic
conductivity values determined from the pumping tests ranged from a low of 0.08 feet per day to
a high of 0.21 feet per day with an average of 0.17 feet per day. Hydraulic conductivity was
estimated to be 0.2 feet per day from the bulk of the Entrada Sandstone.

Monitoring well RM-4 is completed primarily in the lower low permeability sandstone subunit in
the uppermost aquifer and single well pumping test result for this well indicates a result of 0.08
9

feet per day. Single well pumping test results for monitoring well RM8 was 0.02 feet per day. It
should be noted that because of well inefficiency, single well tests results are generally
considered less precise estimates of hydraulic conductivity than multiple well tests. The
hydraulic conductivity was adjusted during the calibration process. The final calibrated values
are shown in Figure 20 and 21 for layer 4 and layers 5 through 10, respectively.

Table 3-1 Aquifer Test Results from RM15 Multi-Well Pump Test and Single
Well Pump Tests
Transmissivity Distance
Well Drawdown Straight Theis Recovery Hydraulic Storage Coefficient From
No. @end Line Early Late Method Permeability Theis Early Jacobs’ Well
(ft) (GPD/ft) Time Time (GPD/ft) Time Method RM15
(GPD/ft) (GPD/ft) (ft/day) (DARCY) Dimensionless Dimensionless (ft)
RM 15 Multi-Well Test Entrada Sandstone
RM15 79.2 360 -- -- -- 0.14 0.04 -- -- --
RM1 0.6 -- -- 420 -- 0.16 0.05 6.0E-04 -- 3032
RM2 0.9 -- -- 420 -- 0.16 0.05 8.0E-04 -- 2204
RM3 3.4 -- 560 560 -- 0.21 0.06 4.6E-04 -- 1130
RM4 11.5 560 440 520 -- 0.20 0.06 3.7E-04 -- 302
RM5 12.2 600 650 560 -- 0.21 0.06 9.6E-04 -- 125
RM6 17.5 480 470 490 -- 0.19 0.06 3.3E-04 -- 125
RM7 0.2 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1619
OW1A 0.9 -- -- 210 -- 0.08 0.02 4.9E-04 -- 2461
Single Well Tests Entrada Sandstone
RM1 14.9 63 -- -- -- 0.14 0.04 -- -- --
RM4 -- -- -- -- 230 0.08 0.02 -- -- --
RM7 57.7 13 -- -- -- 0.02 0.01 -- -- --
RM12 -- 130 -- -- -- 0.05 0.02 -- 8E-05 --
WW1 -- 130 -- -- -- 0.05 0.02 -- 8E-05 --
Single Well Tests Perched Entrada
RM8 14.1 5 -- -- -- 0.02 0.01 -- -- --
RM9 14.1 11 -- -- -- 0.06 0.02 -- -- --
Multi-Well Test Navajo Sandstone
WW1 -- 15800 15700 -- 17000 5.28 1.60 -- -- --
OW1B -- 22600 21300 -- 19800 7.55 2.29 5.6E-03 4.2E-03 53
OW3 -- 18800 -- -- 19800 6.28 1.91 -- 5.0E-03 98.8

3.2.2 Specific Yield
Specific yield can be close to effective porosity. For water table aquifers, the storage coefficient
is the same as the specific yield. The storage coefficient estimate from pumping tests at the site
ranged from 4.2x10-3 to 3.3 x 10-5 indicating a partially confined aquifer. The aquifer could not,
therefore, be considered to be a water table aquifer and the effective porosity could not be
estimated using this technique. Effective porosity was therefore estimated from literature values
to be 0.1 (Freeze & Cherry, 1979). It should be noted, however, that the groundwater model was
executed in steady-state mode, which does not simulate changes in groundwater storage and
therefore specific yield and storage values were not used.
10

3.2.3 Recharge
As stated previously, a reasonable estimate for groundwater recharge is between 0.0001 and
0.0002 feet per day or between 10 to 20 percent of the 5.67 inches per year average precipitation.
This value was adjusted to 0.0001 feet per day (8 percent of 5.67 inches/year) during model
calibration.

3.2.4 General Head Boundary Conditions (GHB)
Boundary conditions were set as constant head cells along the boundaries of the model Figure
22). The constant heads were set to achieve the approximate groundwater elevations and
gradients in the observed data. The general head boundary conditions were computed by
estimating the potentiometric surface in all model layers. The point of constant head at a distance
of 1000 feet outside of the model domain was established for each general head boundary cell.
The model was constructed using constant thicknesses of intermediate cells equal to 50 feet in
the vertical direction. The model domain was also divided into columns and rows of equal sizes
of 25 feet in both the X and Y directions. Hydraulic conductivity used in the general head
boundary calculations was 0.2 feet per day, the same as the Entrada Sandstone. These data were
entered into the graphical user interface (GUI) Groundwater Vistas that automatically calculated
the conductance of the GHB cell. The specific data used in the GHB package of MODFLOW
for model layer 4 is included in Appendix II. Layer 4 GHB data were also used in model layers
5 through 10 but to reduce the size of Appendix II, those data were not included in the Appendix.

3.2.5 Dispersivity
The range of dispersivity used in the model was derived from the Gelhar field-scale evaluation
(Gelhar, 1974). . The transport distance in this model in 100 years, without dispersion, is about
500 to 750 feet. This relationship between the model scale and longitudinal dispersivity is
summarized in Figure 19 and shows the variation of dispersion with the scale of the plume.
Longitudinal dispersivity (DL) was estimated to be 10 feet. Transverse dispersivity (DT) was
estimated to be 10 percent of the longitudinal dispersivity or 1 foot. Similarly the vertical
dispersivity (DV) was estimated to be 10 percent of the transverse dispersivity or 0.1 foot.

3.3 Flow Model Calibration
The model was calibrated using the groundwater elevations collected in 2003. This period was
used because it contained many more measured groundwater elevations than subsequent
monitoring periods. These values are summarized in Table 3-2 below. In addition, the data in
Table 3-2 indicate that the overall gradients at the site have not significantly changed since 2003,
and only minor decreases in overall groundwater table elevations have occurred since that time.

The model was executed in steady-state model. Model parameters were adjusted until sufficient
agreement between the modeled and measured groundwater elevations at the monitoring wells
was achieved. The calibrated value of horizontal hydraulic conductivity for the main Entrada
11

Sandstone was 0.21 feet per day. Vertical hydraulic conductivity calibrated value was 0.1 feet
per day, roughly half the horizontal hydraulic conductivity. Horizontal hydraulic conductivity
value for the lower low conductivity sediments was 0.046 feet per day; vertical hydraulic
conductivity for the lower low conductivity sediments was assigned a value of 0.01 feet per day,
roughly one fifth the horizontal hydraulic conductivity. Recharge was 0.0001 feet per day.

Table 3-2 Comparison of 2003, 2008 and 2017 Groundwater Elevations
Well Easting Northing 2003 2008 2017 Difference Difference Difference
Groundwater Groundwater Groundwater 2003-2008 2003-2017 2008-2017
Elevation Elevation Elevation
OW1A 63730 57140 4243.33
OW2 63667 57094 4247.80
RM1 61827 59307 4273.40 4271.38 4271.07 -2.02 -2.33 -0.31
RM10 61272 56286 4248.47
RM12 61791 59477 4273.45 4272.35 4271.70 -1.10 -1.75 -0.65
RM15 61354 56311 4238.65
RM16 60772 56615 4241.20
RM17 61993 56636 4246.18
RM18 61851 57833 4257.15 4255.98 4255.54 -1.17 -1.61 -0.44
RM19 61524 58077 4256.90 4256.26 4255.70 -0.64 -1.20 -0.56
RM2 63040 57731 4261.51 4261.94

0.43
RM20 61592 57208 4251.63 4249.26 4248.61 -2.37 -3.02 -0.65
RM2R 63142 57924 4265.16 4259.06 4258.56 -6.10 -6.60 -0.50
RM3 60647 57193 4246.66
RM4 61099 56472 4240.10
RM4R 61086 56358 4240.32
RM5 61286 56416 4239.72
RM6 61481 56348 4239.17
RM7 61645 57904 4255.96 4254.86 4254.06 -1.10 -1.90 -0.80

3.4 Calibrated Parameters
Model parameters that were varied during calibration included the horizontal hydraulic
conductivity, the vertical hydraulic conductivity and recharge. The model values were varied
over the range of expected values until the modeled heads at the monitoring wells reasonably
matched those measured in 2003. Table 3-3 summarizes the calibrated model parameters.

12

Table 3-3 Calibrated Model Parameters
Calibrated Calibrated
Parameter Value Value Units
Horizontal Hydraulic Kx, Ky Kz
Conductivity Entrada 0.21 0.1 Feet/Day
Hydraulic Conductivity
Lower Low Permeability Kx, Ky Kz
Zone 0.046 0.01 Feet/Day
Recharge 0.0001

Feet/Day
Longitudinal Dispersivity 10

Feet
Transverse Dispersivity 1

Feet
Vertical Dispersivity 0.1

Feet

3.5 Model Calibration Results
The calibrated flow and transport model results are presented in Figure 23. The greatest recorded
error occurs in monitoring well RM 20. This well was on the boundary of the upper low
permeability zone were the perched water occurs. The final calibrated model contained 0.005
percent mass balance errors. This value represents a very low mass balance error is considered
acceptable. The flow model calibration was evaluated by comparing the modeled and measured
heads up monitoring well locations. The model calibration statistics are summarized below in
Table 3-4. A comparison of the measured heads and the modeled heads is illustrated in Figure
25. The results indicate that the model is well calibrated. The residual mean is less than 0.5 feet.
The scaled root mean squared (RMS) value is 0.075 or less than 8 percent error over the whole
modeled domain. The calibration results indicate that the model is well calibrated. The absolute
residual mean is slightly over two feet. Scaled residual mean contains less than two percent error.

3.6 MT3D Modeling
The results of the calibrated flow model were used to generate the transport model using the
model code MT3DMS. The transport model is uncalibrated since there are no actual released to
be matched. The MT3DMS model was used to assess appropriate point of compliance well
spacing and screen depth by simulating transport and dispersion of a potential groundwater
impact for different locations within the tailings cells. No particular constituent was simulated
during the transport modeling exercise. The constituent is assumed to be non-retarded and
conservative in transport meaning that there are no chemical reactions available to reduce the
constituent to another compound (e.g. biodegradation) nor are there sorption–desorption
mechanisms for slowing the solute velocity.

The transport model results at the end of 100 years of simulation are presented in Figure 23. A
cross-sectional view of the modeled plume along model column 48 is presented in Figure 24.
Two wells were placed into the flow model, one in the north cell, and one in the south cell to
introduce a contaminant into the groundwater. MODFLOW-2000 does not simulate unsaturated
13

flow and the first encountered groundwater occurs in model layer 3. The models injected fluid
into the model at a rate of 0.25 gallons per minute in model layer 3. The concentration of the
fluid was 1,000 µg/L, or one ppm. The model location for the northern well is row 57, column 48
and layer 3. The southern well location is row 113, column 30 and layer 3.

Table 3-4 Flow Model Calibration Statistics
Name X Y Layer Observed Computed Residual
OW2 63667 57094 4 4247.80 4246.55 1.25
RM1 61827 59307 4 4273.40 4273.32 0.08
RM10 61275 56285 4 4248.47 4241.69 6.78
RM12 61791 59477 4 4273.45 4274.48 -1.03
RM15 61354 56311 4 4238.65 4241.97 -3.32
RM16 60772 56615 4 4241.20 4243.24 -2.04
RM17 61993 56636 4 4246.18 4245.86 0.32
RM18 61851 57833 4 4257.15 4258.09 -0.94
RM19 61524 58077 4 4256.90 4259.09 -2.19
RM2 63040 57731 4 4261.51 4259.03 2.48
RM20 61592 57208 4 4251.63 4251.52 0.11
RM2R 63142 57924 4 4265.16 4262.13 3.03
RM3 60647 57193 4 4246.66 4246.83 -0.17
RM4 61096 56472 4 4240.10 4243.06 -2.96
RM4R 61086 56358 4 4240.32 4241.77 -1.45
RM5 61286 56416 4 4239.72 4243.00 -3.28
RM6 61481 56348 4 4239.17 4242.51 -3.34
RM7 61645 57903 4 4255.96 4257.96 -2.00
Residual Mean -0.483
Absolute Residual Mean 2.042
Residual Std. Deviation 2.555
Sum of Squares 121.658
RMS Error 2.600
Min. Residual -3.343
Max. Residual 6.781
Number of Observations 18
Range in Observations (Feet) 34.80
Scaled Residual Std. Deviation 0.073
Scaled Absolute Residual Mean 0.059
Scaled RMS Error 0.075
Scaled Residual Mean -0.014

14

The model was then simulated for a period of 100 years. The results of the simulation are
illustrated in Figure 23. The figure summarizes all model layers by displaying the highest
concentration found in any model layer. The minimum concentration of the displayed plume is
1.0 µg/L (0.001 mg/L). The resulting northern plume is elongated in the north-south direction
due to the flow field in that area. In the northern portion of the site, flow is from north to south.
The northern plume, at the 0.001 mg/L concentration, has dispersed to a width of 675 feet and
has moved downgradient 575 feet. The modeled southern plume has a much wider character and
shows greater dispersion than the northern plume. The southern plume has dispersed to a width
of 1,000 feet and had traveled a distance of 750 feet downgradient of the injection point.

These results indicated very low solute velocities that result in very long travel times. Even after
100 years, the solute representing the southern liner tear has not traveled a great enough distance
to be detected by any proposed groundwater monitoring well. In order to detect any potential tear
in the tailings facility liner, monitoring wells would be required within the proposed disposal cell
footprint. This would undoubtedly help form a lining failure.
3.7 Stochastic Model
Stoichiometric methods were used in lieu of more rigorous calibration efforts to obtain the most
likely spread of potential plumes. The stochastic model used Monte Carlo techniques to vary the
hydrogeologic parameters over the range of expected values. The parameters and ranges are
provided in Table 3-5. These values were obtained from Table 3-1. The mean piezometric head
distribution resulting from the stochastic modeling is illustrated in Figure 23. Permeability values
were varied one order of magnitude above and below the mean value for each hydrostratigraphic
unit.

The calibrated flow and transport were implemented as the basis for the stochastic model.
Parameters were varied automatically over the ranges specified in Table 3-5. The permeability
was varied over the range observed in the data. Porosity values were obtained from a literature
review (Freeze and Cherry, 1979). The values used for porosity were varied over a large range
of values in the stochastic model to account for the wide variation in reported values. Dispersion
was varied from a low value of 5 feet to a high of 25 feet. Both the flow and transport models
were executed for 100 realizations or individual unique runs varying the parameters within the
ranges in Table 3-5 for a period of 100 years.

Table 3-5 Parameters Used in the Stochastic Flow and Transport Model
Parameter Distribution Parameter Standard Minimum Maximum
Value Deviation Parameter Parameter
Value Value
Entrada LogNormal 0.2 2 0.05 0.21
Permeability
Sandstone LogNormal 0.02 2 0.05 0.21
Subunit
Permeability
Porosity Normal 0.1 2 .01 0.15
Dispersivity Normal 10 2 5 25

15

3.7.1 Stochastic Groundwater Modeling Results
The stochastic groundwater flow and transport modeling results confirm that the groundwater
flow velocity is very low. At the conclusion of the stochastic simulations, the mean plume
extents were calculated using Groundwater Vistas. Figure 26 summarizes the results of the
modeling effort. The figure shows the footprints of both plumes. As with the calibrated plume,
the highest concentration in any model layer is displayed. The resulting plume emanating from
the northern source had developed sufficient width to be detected by monitoring wells spaced of
500 feet apart. Although the plume extended to a depth 4 feet (250 feet below groundwater
surface) at the proposed monitoring well network, the highest concentrations and greatest mass
was located between the water table and 100 feet below the water table (Figure 24).
Groundwater is encountered at depths of approximately 120 feet to 150 feet below ground level
and the base of the planned tailings pond. To ensure detection of this modeled plume,
monitoring wells will require approximately 500 feet spacing between wells that are screened to
a depth of 50 to 100 feet below the groundwater surface (approximately 170 to 220 feet deep).

The plume from the source term placed approximately 500 feet from the monitoring network that
passes through the lower low permeability zone in the uppermost aquifer barely had sufficient
time to reach the monitoring well network within the 100 year simulation. This source was
placed about 100 feet north of the base of the tailings dam. The plume was approximately1,000
feet in width and the highest concentrations and greatest mass was located at depths between the
groundwater surface and 50 feet (Figure 21) To ensure detection of this simulated plume,
monitoring wells will need to be spaced 500 feet apart and be screened from the water table to a
depth of 100 feet below the water table or approximately 120 to 170 feet below ground surface.
The results of the stochastic modeling also include the ability to calculate the probability of
exceeding a certain concentration. Figure 27 illustrates the probability that any location will
exceed concentrations greater than 1.0 µg/L within 100 years of transport.

To be certain of detecting any possible contamination released from the tailings pond, the more
restrictive well design of the two release points should be implemented. Maximum monitor well
spacing should be 500 feet to detect potential releases from the nearest point within the tailings
pond. The wells should be screened from approximately 5 feet above the groundwater surface to
100 feet below the groundwater surface (120 to 220 feet below ground surface). Figures 28 and
29 illustrate the proposed locations for the groundwater monitoring wells.

3.8 Particle Tracking Model
In addition to the stochastic modeling, MODPATH (Polluck, 1994) was also used to evaluate
the transport of potential releases from the tailings pond. The advantage of the MODPATH
model is that it takes relatively less time to compute the particle path lines. The model is
incapable of computing actual concentrations but is useful in determining potential monitoring
well locations.

MODPATH particles were placed around the perimeter of the tailings pond, at the top of the
water table. The particles were allowed to run until they exited the model at the southern end of
the model. Figure 29 indicates that the particles substantially remain within the foot print of the
16

valley floor. There is some excursion from the monitoring well network to the west by particles
that were release in the extreme northwestern portion of the tailings pond.

17

4.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM
This section describes the basis for design of the proposed groundwater monitoring network of
wells for the Shootaring Canyon Mill. The monitoring well network is based on the results of a
stochastic groundwater model developed from site specific data and based on the current
hydrogeologic conceptual model. The modeling effort was used to support location, well spacing
and depth of the groundwater monitoring well network required to detect potential releases from
the tailing pond. The monitoring plan also includes well constituent lists and sampling
frequency. The monitoring well network included in the modeling exercise included one up-
gradient well and seven down-gradient wells that are used for statistical evaluations. The
modeled dispersion of the solute produced plumes 650 and 1,000 feet in width. The seven
monitoring wells should be placed at the base of the tailings pond dam and near the edge of the
Proposed Disposal Cell as illustrated in Figure 26. The monitoring well locations are specified
in Table 4-1.

Table 4-1 Monitoring Well Locations
Easting Northing Well Name
60623.65 57135.12 POC-1
60617.71 56683.79 POC-2
61027.47 56297.78 POC-3
61526.31 56333.41 POC-4
62007.33 56464.06 POC-5
62221.12 57230.13 POC-6
62607.12 57901.19 POC-7

Well spacing should be on the order of 400 feet to ensure detection of potential releases close to
the monitoring well network. This distance is considered conservative as the plume minimum
modeled plume width is 800 feet. The wells should be screened from approximately five feet
above the groundwater surface to a depth of 100 feet below the groundwater surface or
approximately 120 to 170 feet below ground surface.

The sampling interval for the monitoring well system should be at no more frequent than one
year. As presented earlier, the expected groundwater velocity is less than 7 feet per year.
Potential releases from anywhere in the tailing pond footprint will require almost 100 years to
reach a monitoring well, without considering the effect of retardation on solute transport.

Low flow sampling methods should be employed to reduce the analytical costs for the
groundwater monitoring program. Standard practices for low flow purging and sampling of
groundwater monitoring wells allow for sampling at multiple intervals with a monitoring well
screen (U.S. EPA, 1996 and ATTM D6771). Implementing multiple sampling points with the
low flow sampling protocol will allow for a significant reduction in laboratory costs over the
lifetime of the mill and subsequent closure sampling.
18

5.0 REFERENCES
ASTM D6771. Standard Practice for Low Flow Purging and Sampling for Wells and
Devices Used for Ground-Water Quality Investigations. ASTM International.

Gelhar, Lynn W., C. Welty and K.R. Rehfeldt . 1974. A Critical Review of Field-Scale
Dispersion in Aquifers. Water Resources Research.

Freeze, R. and J. Cherry, 1979, Groundwater, Prentice-Hall

Gregory, Herbert E. and Thorpe, M.E. Rutherford. 1938. The San Juan Country: a
Geographic and Geologic Reconnaissance of Southeastern Utah,
Washington: U. S. Govt. Printing Office

Harbaugh, A. and M. McDonald, 1994. User’s Documentation for MODFLOW-96, an
update to the U.S. Geological Survey Modular Finite-Difference Ground-Water Flow
Model, Open-File Report 96-485

Hydro-Engineering. 2006. Ground-water Monitoring of Shootaring Canyon Tailings

Hydro-Engineering. 1998. Ground-water Hydrology of Shootaring Canyon Tailings.

Pollock, D. 1994. User’s Guide for MODPATH/MODPATH-PLOT, Version 3: A
particle tracking post-processing package for MODFLOW, the U. S. Geological Survey
finite-difference ground-water flow model. U.S. Geological Survey.

Rumbaugh, J. and D. Rumbaugh. 2004. A Guide to Using Groundwater Vistas.
Environmental Simulations, Inc.

Uranium One USA, Inc. “Shootaring Canyon Uranium Mill Tailings Storage
Facility Design Report, May 27, 2008”.

U.S. EPA. 1996. Low-Flow (Minimal Drawdown) Ground-Water Sampling Procedures
EPA/540/S-95/504. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, D.C.

U.S. Climate Data Web Site
(http://www.usclimatedata.com/climate/hanksville/utah/united-states/usut0101)

Zheng, C., and P. Wang, 1999. MT3DMS: A Modular Three-Dimensional Multispecies
Transport Model for Simulation of Advection, Dispersion, and Chemical Reactions of
Contaminants in Groundwater Systems; Documentation and User’s Guide.
19

6.0 FIGURES

Figure 1 General Site Location
AquiferTek

AquiferTek
Figure 2 Site Location Map
l I {t _,,_,,
H auksvill(''

AquiferTek
Figure
3 Local Site Geologic Map
naron ro~lllion
CANVON /C£0.0.R BREAKS
S lt1J J lll O.ffs
Formauon f(hsl)
No•o.io S.ndJI~n <
ZION NATIOHI\L PAR I<:
MU&:n!JY\: Form;.tiun
~~"""~6111 l'annauon
I roo
Sprin&>
f <n
o(
c.dol Cuy
t\1~
---------------------·
s

AquiferTek
Figure 4 Monitoring Well and Cross-Section
Location Map

AquiferTek
Figure 5 Tailings Pond Liner Detail
.d · •• .. ..
4" .. .. "<I ..

AquiferTek
Figure 6 Geologic Section of Colorado Plateau
Sediments

AquiferTek
Figure 7 Geologic Cross-Section 1-1’
"""
""' ....
'""
....
;;l :.:
,!. "''' ...
z s ... ,
~
G;
;:;l 11::10
.,,.
'"'
... ,
"""
,,.,
\
\JELL
RM11
400 0 2 00 400 600
wnL LOCIIITICN, TOTAL DD"TH, AND
SLDTTED 0F1 OPEN Hot..E .-TERVAL
CARid EL FOR id i\TION
L--~-'---'400
350 700
2004 \lATER LEVEL
ELEVA TDN
ENTRADA SANDSTONE
\IELL
RM13
1'
400 0 200 400 600
a 21!1 DID 10D :ZOO •• AnER tn'D~-ENGINEERINrW 200&

AquiferTek
Figure 8 Geologic Cross-Section 2-2’
2'
2
4811 .. 'w'ELL Rf13
VELL RM14
W'ELL RM2
N:l.IT~ON CAf'D
~(I'IPI>
N£UTRDN <JR) \JEL L
0 900 l 900 2100
0 SlOG lSOO 2700
_!.' 900 1000
"""' RM2R
·-1-0 F:
OlU! ......
~ '::'!LL ~~~? l..CUMiiJIIJII $EIMCE WELL RMIS
-
• NCUT~ON (Af"D -::e:--1--1r
·~· 1-.--r-~ ~ ...a_ ~~~.~.~ 0 ~ -' -....4...., 9DQ 1900
L TOP r1 eu.v UMUI
~
2700
BEI.OW T""IUN05
... 1-'"' 1.5 ' ;r~!t~~~~~I:JfiiiM
!DO ~
9 lOO lw-~o:r&-~
<mo I-
b ~ 1. I ~ !OJRF.o%
1-<
u ~ .i lOO ~I J L .. "'
~ ·~ r
~ _j ttll.ot VATI:R LCY E:o..
i'"
H ~ .. "!:.
100
E:U:VI\TION l§ l
~ ~
t {
~
~
il
200
l ,~~I f I r -8-~
1m l r
' ~ ~ 1-t
~ ~> b ZDD
~ il II lJ ; 200]l rt ·-~ II t· ~ . ""
d ""' 1-... I ~ L • ~ ""' ~ :,: .
SDO
·~ I-... 300
·~· 1-4oG0
""'
.000 ' ,.~.
6;
400 6DO
&II
'" • ... 1-
zoa ·H•o eo o
n •o
000 D
W'tU. ~N, TOTAL CU"Ot .... D ~
ENTRADA 5AN DSTOHE
200 400 'DO ..oo
i2DJ -'IIJJ 600 UmP 0~ OPtN IKII.I: llfllW,.Ir&.
0 200 100 600
.
'""I-!; r
J~~:~• L
CAR~EL FOR~.tTION D SO 101)
llc.la.DW'I'""'l ,.. ""' ••
~

AquiferTek
Figure 9 Geologic Cross-Section 3-3’
3
"'"
"'"
Cr:Ll2 OGIGN
Ptt....,..,liON 'tRVICl
ENTRA DA S AN DSTONE
CARME L rORMATION
2104 \/" 1Ut LE:VE:L
I:LEVATDJN
E NTRAOA SAtl DSTOH[
0 200
'Wll LOC411DH, lCJAL. OEP'TH, AND
SLOniD 0 1! OP£M HOU ltm:JNAL.
3'
J:::ID 7to

AquiferTek
Figure 10 EVS Model Top of Model Showing
Uppermost Entrada
Geo_Layer

AquiferTek
Figure 11 EVS Model - Uppermost Low
Conductivity Zone
Oe o_Layer ..

AquiferTek
Figure 12 EVS Model – Uppermost Low
Conductivity Zone Removed
Oeo_Layer
En lra da 3

AquiferTek
Figure 13 EVS Model – Deep Lower Conductivity
Zone
Geo_Layer

AquiferTek
Figure 14 EVS Model- Deep Lower Conductivity
Zone Removed
Ge o_LayE!r
En trada3

AquiferTek
Figure 15 North – South Cross Section of
Conceptual Model
Geo_La~er
En1rad a2
Low-erl..owt<
En1rad aJ

AquiferTek
Figure 16 2003 Measured Groundwater Elevations

AquiferTek
Figure 17 Perched Groundwater Table
s
60500 61000 61500 62000 62500

AquiferTek
Figure 18 Model Domain
s

AquiferTek
Figure 19 Dispersion Estimate
• •• o• 4 • 0 ... 0 ....
0
•
-1 o2 e -
~ ·::;
·~ 1 01
§.
0
Ci 10° c:
~
.~
t:D r:::
1 o-1 0
...J
co "i ... ::::ll ::::ll e j • 8.
tracer • 0 tests
contam. ... A • events
en vir. .I 01
tracers
10~~~~~~~~~~~~8L-L~~~~~~~~
1 o-1 1 o0 1 0 1 1 o2 1 o3 1 o4 1 o5 1 o6
Scale (m)

AquiferTek
Figure 20 Model Layer 4 Hydraulic Conductivity
(ft./d)

Legend
Hydrauli c Co nductivity (ft/d)
Zone Va lue s
2 0.05
1 0 .21
2000 feet

AquiferTek
Figure 21 Model Layers 5 through 10 Hydraulic
Conductivity (ft./d)
N
Legen d * Hydrau lic Conductivity (ft/d) w E
Zone Va lue
2 0.05 s
0.21
2000 feet

AquiferTek
Figure 22 General Head Boundary Locations
Legend
GHB
s

AquiferTek
Figure 23 Calibrated Flow and Transport
Modeling Results
Minimum Concentration 1.0 µg/L

AquiferTek
Figure 24 Cross-Sectional View of Modeled Plume
Column 48
South North
50’ 1

AquiferTek
Figure 25 Modeled Versus Measured Heads
4235
4240
4245
4250
4255
4260
4265
4270
4275
4280
4235 4240 4245 4250 4255 4260 4265 4270 4275 4280
Mo
d
e
l
e
d

D
a
t
a

Observed Data
Measured Heads
Equal to Modeled
± 10% Error

AquiferTek
Figure 26 Stochastic Plumes at 100 Years
Minimum Concentration 1.0 µg/L
1700 FEET

AquiferTek
Figure 27 Probability of Exceeding 1.0 µg/L After
100 Years

AquiferTek
Figure 28

Proposed Groundwater Monitoring Well
Locations

AquiferTek
Figure 29 Particle Tracking Results
20

7.0 APPENDIX I PERCHED WATER TABLE FLUX CALCULATIONS
21

ProJect ~:.!.::O:..J.±a..::..;;..:,r...:..:../'\:.;;.;t .. =:-----
--'
Dale 4/"J~
AquiferTek
L. J..l --1-
?,-4 ,Of..._ ~-\ '-z .c~ I L'.f-.
"26
_,..,
jC, rro&V ct 'tl'lj fH'C.4-V
L 130 (4. 5_1'1-l. iti •Hl'~· -CJ ~ "' C'. I C;t. A = 13""' ~ c)d -13 fll-2.
3 1-(-0.2 "1-/d
4 & K~A ;;:-Q 2.. ~ I Z2 """-13 -::: 1?8f1 :1 t!..
22

~~:..:::::.;::......:____:___;_;....;..;;;.:...;:;.:..:........;;;;.."';......; h.tl\.5 fa..i t r
Page_of _1 _
AquiferTek
r -0 00 0 2.. ~-t /d.
7.. A tA c-&:= pc c e.t.l ' q -=lO, OBB (-f"t
~r n Ct.. • k"{), t~ /~to Ct /J
I" ~A Yc ~~ I ()r (I tA.p;
Jn.~ . 1~--" ~ Is r(/ 4-a.I...W:V ,
I ?6 .f-1 ;fct
23

8.0 APPENDIX II GHB PARAMETERS
24

Row Column Layer Head
Cell
Width
Saturated
Thickness
GHB
Distance K
169 129 4 4224.549 25 10 1000 0.21
169 125 4 4226.179 25 10 1000 0.21
169 126 4 4225.721 25 10 1000 0.21
169 127 4 4225.252 25 10 1000 0.21
168 129 4 4224.277 25 10 1000 0.21
169 121 4 4228.092 25 10 1000 0.21
169 122 4 4227.683 25 10 1000 0.21
169 123 4 4227.264 25 10 1000 0.21
169 124 4 4226.833 25 10 1000 0.21
167 129 4 4224.506 25 10 1000 0.21
169 117 4 4229.798 25 10 1000 0.21
169 118 4 4229.437 25 10 1000 0.21
169 119 4 4229.065 25 10 1000 0.21
169 120 4 4228.683 25 10 1000 0.21
166 129 4 4224.739 25 10 1000 0.21
169 113 4 4231.311 25 10 1000 0.21
169 114 4 4230.994 25 10 1000 0.21
169 115 4 4230.667 25 10 1000 0.21
169 116 4 4230.331 25 10 1000 0.21
165 129 4 4224.975 25 10 1000 0.21
169 110 4 4232.365 25 10 1000 0.21
169 111 4 4232.081 25 10 1000 0.21
169 112 4 4231.787 25 10 1000 0.21
164 129 4 4224.728 25 10 1000 0.21
169 106 4 4233.561 25 10 1000 0.21
169 107 4 4233.317 25 10 1000 0.21
169 108 4 4233.064 25 10 1000 0.21
169 109 4 4232.802 25 10 1000 0.21
163 129 4 4224.976 25 10 1000 0.21
169 102 4 4234.592 25 10 1000 0.21
169 103 4 4234.386 25 10 1000 0.21
169 104 4 4234.171 25 10 1000 0.21
169 105 4 4233.947 25 10 1000 0.21
162 129 4 4225.227 25 10 1000 0.21
169 99 4 4235.299 25 10 1000 0.21
169 100 4 4235.119 25 10 1000 0.21
161 129 4 4225.482 25 10 1000 0.21
169 94 4 4236.067 25 10 1000 0.21
169 95 4 4235.92 25 10 1000 0.21
169 96 4 4235.766 25 10 1000 0.21
169 97 4 4235.605 25 10 1000 0.21
160 129 4 4225.259 25 10 1000 0.21
25

169 90 4 4236.701 25 10 1000 0.21
169 91 4 4236.585 25 10 1000 0.21
169 92 4 4236.462 25 10 1000 0.21
169 93 4 4236.332 25 10 1000 0.21
159 129 4 4225.525 25 10 1000 0.21
169 86 4 4237.212 25 10 1000 0.21
169 87 4 4237.124 25 10 1000 0.21
169 88 4 4237.029 25 10 1000 0.21
169 89 4 4236.928 25 10 1000 0.21
158 129 4 4225.795 25 10 1000 0.21
169 83 4 4237.548 25 10 1000 0.21
169 84 4 4237.479 25 10 1000 0.21
169 85 4 4237.404 25 10 1000 0.21
157 129 4 4225.588 25 10 1000 0.21
169 79 4 4237.868 25 10 1000 0.21
169 80 4 4237.822 25 10 1000 0.21
169 81 4 4237.772 25 10 1000 0.21
169 82 4 4237.716 25 10 1000 0.21
156 129 4 4225.869 25 10 1000 0.21
169 75 4 4238.095 25 10 1000 0.21
169 76 4 4238.07 25 10 1000 0.21
169 77 4 4238.041 25 10 1000 0.21
169 78 4 4238.007 25 10 1000 0.21
155 129 4 4226.152 25 10 1000 0.21
169 71 4 4238.24 25 10 1000 0.21
169 72 4 4238.233 25 10 1000 0.21
169 73 4 4238.223 25 10 1000 0.21
169 74 4 4238.208 25 10 1000 0.21
154 129 4 4226.44 25 10 1000 0.21
169 68 4 4238.323 25 10 1000 0.21
169 69 4 4238.33 25 10 1000 0.21
169 70 4 4238.329 25 10 1000 0.21
153 129 4 4226.256 25 10 1000 0.21
169 63 4 4237.349 25 10 1000 0.21
169 64 4 4237.368 25 10 1000 0.21
169 65 4 4237.385 25 10 1000 0.21
169 66 4 4237.398 25 10 1000 0.21
152 129 4 4226.554 25 10 1000 0.21
169 59 4 4237.324 25 10 1000 0.21
169 60 4 4237.354 25 10 1000 0.21
169 61 4 4237.382 25 10 1000 0.21
169 62 4 4237.408 25 10 1000 0.21
151 129 4 4226.855 25 10 1000 0.21
169 55 4 4237.258 25 10 1000 0.21
169 56 4 4237.296 25 10 1000 0.21
26

169 57 4 4237.333 25 10 1000 0.21
169 58 4 4237.369 25 10 1000 0.21
150 129 4 4227.16 25 10 1000 0.21
169 52 4 4237.206 25 10 1000 0.21
169 53 4 4237.249 25 10 1000 0.21
169 54 4 4237.292 25 10 1000 0.21
149 129 4 4226.999 25 10 1000 0.21
169 48 4 4237.093 25 10 1000 0.21
169 49 4 4237.141 25 10 1000 0.21
169 50 4 4237.188 25 10 1000 0.21
169 51 4 4237.234 25 10 1000 0.21
148 129 4 4227.314 25 10 1000 0.21
169 44 4 4236.97 25 10 1000 0.21
169 45 4 4237.019 25 10 1000 0.21
169 46 4 4237.068 25 10 1000 0.21
169 47 4 4237.117 25 10 1000 0.21
147 129 4 4227.632 25 10 1000 0.21
169 41 4 4236.895 25 10 1000 0.21
169 42 4 4236.943 25 10 1000 0.21
169 43 4 4236.992 25 10 1000 0.21
145 129 4 4227.487 25 10 1000 0.21
169 36 4 4236.779 25 10 1000 0.21
169 37 4 4236.824 25 10 1000 0.21
169 38 4 4236.871 25 10 1000 0.21
169 39 4 4236.918 25 10 1000 0.21
144 129 4 4227.815 25 10 1000 0.21
169 32 4 4236.682 25 10 1000 0.21
169 33 4 4236.722 25 10 1000 0.21
169 34 4 4236.763 25 10 1000 0.21
169 35 4 4236.806 25 10 1000 0.21
169 28 4 4236.616 25 10 1000 0.21
169 29 4 4236.647 25 10 1000 0.21
169 30 4 4236.681 25 10 1000 0.21
169 31 4 4236.717 25 10 1000 0.21
143 129 4 4228.48 25 10 1000 0.21
169 25 4 4236.611 25 10 1000 0.21
169 26 4 4236.635 25 10 1000 0.21
169 27 4 4236.661 25 10 1000 0.21
141 129 4 4228.358 25 10 1000 0.21
169 21 4 4236.625 25 10 1000 0.21
169 22 4 4236.635 25 10 1000 0.21
169 23 4 4236.649 25 10 1000 0.21
169 24 4 4236.666 25 10 1000 0.21
140 129 4 4228.702 25 10 1000 0.21
169 17 4 4236.698 25 10 1000 0.21
27

169 18 4 4236.694 25 10 1000 0.21
169 19 4 4236.693 25 10 1000 0.21
169 20 4 4236.696 25 10 1000 0.21
139 129 4 4229.049 25 10 1000 0.21
169 13 4 4237.844 25 10 1000 0.21
169 14 4 4237.821 25 10 1000 0.21
169 15 4 4237.803 25 10 1000 0.21
169 16 4 4237.789 25 10 1000 0.21
138 129 4 4229.398 25 10 1000 0.21
169 10 4 4238.027 25 10 1000 0.21
169 11 4 4237.989 25 10 1000 0.21
169 12 4 4237.929 25 10 1000 0.21
137 129 4 4229.298 25 10 1000 0.21
169 5 4 4238.325 25 10 1000 0.21
169 6 4 4238.264 25 10 1000 0.21
169 7 4 4238.209 25 10 1000 0.21
169 8 4 4238.16 25 10 1000 0.21
136 129 4 4229.658 25 10 1000 0.21
169 1 4 4238.723 25 10 1000 0.21
169 2 4 4238.638 25 10 1000 0.21
169 3 4 4238.559 25 10 1000 0.21
169 4 4 4238.486 25 10 1000 0.21
135 129 4 4230.02 25 10 1000 0.21
168 1 4 4238.823 25 10 1000 0.21
134 129 4 4230.384 25 10 1000 0.21
167 1 4 4238.926 25 10 1000 0.21
133 129 4 4230.306 25 10 1000 0.21
166 1 4 4238.944 25 10 1000 0.21
132 129 4 4230.68 25 10 1000 0.21
165 1 4 4239.052 25 10 1000 0.21
131 129 4 4231.057 25 10 1000 0.21
164 1 4 4239.164 25 10 1000 0.21
130 129 4 4230.992 25 10 1000 0.21
163 1 4 4239.279 25 10 1000 0.21
129 129 4 4231.379 25 10 1000 0.21
162 1 4 4239.313 25 10 1000 0.21
128 129 4 4231.767 25 10 1000 0.21
161 1 4 4239.433 25 10 1000 0.21
127 129 4 4232.158 25 10 1000 0.21
160 1 4 4239.557 25 10 1000 0.21
126 129 4 4232.115 25 10 1000 0.21
159 1 4 4239.683 25 10 1000 0.21
125 129 4 4232.515 25 10 1000 0.21
158 1 4 4239.733 25 10 1000 0.21
124 129 4 4232.917 25 10 1000 0.21
28

157 1 4 4239.865 25 10 1000 0.21
123 129 4 4233.322 25 10 1000 0.21
156 1 4 4239.999 25 10 1000 0.21
122 129 4 4233.299 25 10 1000 0.21
155 1 4 4240.137 25 10 1000 0.21
121 129 4 4233.712 25 10 1000 0.21
154 1 4 4240.202 25 10 1000 0.21
120 129 4 4234.128 25 10 1000 0.21
153 1 4 4240.344 25 10 1000 0.21
119 129 4 4234.546 25 10 1000 0.21
152 1 4 4240.489 25 10 1000 0.21
118 129 4 4234.543 25 10 1000 0.21
151 1 4 4240.567 25 10 1000 0.21
117 129 4 4234.969 25 10 1000 0.21
150 1 4 4240.717 25 10 1000 0.21
116 129 4 4235.398 25 10 1000 0.21
149 1 4 4240.87 25 10 1000 0.21
114 129 4 4235.408 25 10 1000 0.21
148 1 4 4241.025 25 10 1000 0.21
113 129 4 4235.845 25 10 1000 0.21
147 1 4 4241.117 25 10 1000 0.21
112 129 4 4236.284 25 10 1000 0.21
146 1 4 4241.277 25 10 1000 0.21
111 129 4 4236.724 25 10 1000 0.21
145 1 4 4241.44 25 10 1000 0.21
110 129 4 4236.754 25 10 1000 0.21
144 1 4 4241.605 25 10 1000 0.21
109 129 4 4237.203 25 10 1000 0.21
142 1 4 4241.711 25 10 1000 0.21
108 129 4 4237.653 25 10 1000 0.21
107 129 4 4238.106 25 10 1000 0.21
141 1 4 4242.052 25 10 1000 0.21
106 129 4 4238.154 25 10 1000 0.21
140 1 4 4242.226 25 10 1000 0.21
105 129 4 4238.614 25 10 1000 0.21
138 1 4 4242.346 25 10 1000 0.21
104 129 4 4239.076 25 10 1000 0.21
137 1 4 4242.524 25 10 1000 0.21
103 129 4 4239.136 25 10 1000 0.21
136 1 4 4242.704 25 10 1000 0.21
102 129 4 4239.606 25 10 1000 0.21
135 1 4 4242.835 25 10 1000 0.21
101 129 4 4240.078 25 10 1000 0.21
134 1 4 4243.019 25 10 1000 0.21
100 129 4 4240.551 25 10 1000 0.21
29

133 1 4 4243.206 25 10 1000 0.21
99 129 4 4240.629 25 10 1000 0.21
132 1 4 4243.394 25 10 1000 0.21
98 129 4 4241.11 25 10 1000 0.21
131 1 4 4243.539 25 10 1000 0.21
97 129 4 4241.591 25 10 1000 0.21
130 1 4 4243.731 25 10 1000 0.21
96 129 4 4242.075 25 10 1000 0.21
129 1 4 4243.925 25 10 1000 0.21
95 129 4 4242.171 25 10 1000 0.21
128 1 4 4244.121 25 10 1000 0.21
94 129 4 4242.661 25 10 1000 0.21
127 1 4 4244.278 25 10 1000 0.21
93 129 4 4243.153 25 10 1000 0.21
126 1 4 4244.477 25 10 1000 0.21
92 129 4 4243.646 25 10 1000 0.21
125 1 4 4244.679 25 10 1000 0.21
91 129 4 4243.759 25 10 1000 0.21
124 1 4 4244.882 25 10 1000 0.21
90 129 4 4244.259 25 10 1000 0.21
123 1 4 4245.051 25 10 1000 0.21
89 129 4 4244.76 25 10 1000 0.21
122 1 4 4245.257 25 10 1000 0.21
87 129 4 4244.885 25 10 1000 0.21
121 1 4 4245.465 25 10 1000 0.21
86 129 4 4245.393 25 10 1000 0.21
120 1 4 4245.644 25 10 1000 0.21
119 1 4 4245.855 25 10 1000 0.21
85 129 4 4246.412 25 10 1000 0.21
118 1 4 4246.068 25 10 1000 0.21
83 129 4 4246.552 25 10 1000 0.21
117 1 4 4246.283 25 10 1000 0.21
82 129 4 4247.069 25 10 1000 0.21
116 1 4 4246.473 25 10 1000 0.21
81 129 4 4247.587 25 10 1000 0.21
115 1 4 4246.69 25 10 1000 0.21
80 129 4 4248.105 25 10 1000 0.21
114 1 4 4246.909 25 10 1000 0.21
79 129 4 4248.262 25 10 1000 0.21
113 1 4 4247.129 25 10 1000 0.21
78 129 4 4248.787 25 10 1000 0.21
111 1 4 4247.33 25 10 1000 0.21
77 129 4 4249.312 25 10 1000 0.21
110 1 4 4247.552 25 10 1000 0.21
76 129 4 4249.838 25 10 1000 0.21
30

75 129 4 4250.011 25 10 1000 0.21
109 1 4 4248.002 25 10 1000 0.21
108 1 4 4247.987 25 10 1000 0.21
74 129 4 4250.543 25 10 1000 0.21
107 1 4 4248.213 25 10 1000 0.21
73 129 4 4251.076 25 10 1000 0.21
106 1 4 4248.441 25 10 1000 0.21
72 129 4 4251.258 25 10 1000 0.21
105 1 4 4248.67 25 10 1000 0.21
71 129 4 4251.797 25 10 1000 0.21
104 1 4 4248.89 25 10 1000 0.21
70 129 4 4252.337 25 10 1000 0.21
103 1 4 4249.121 25 10 1000 0.21
69 129 4 4252.877 25 10 1000 0.21
102 1 4 4249.353 25 10 1000 0.21
68 129 4 4253.074 25 10 1000 0.21
101 1 4 4249.586 25 10 1000 0.21
67 129 4 4253.619 25 10 1000 0.21
100 1 4 4249.816 25 10 1000 0.21
66 129 4 4254.165 25 10 1000 0.21
99 1 4 4250.051 25 10 1000 0.21
65 129 4 4254.712 25 10 1000 0.21
98 1 4 4250.287 25 10 1000 0.21
64 129 4 4254.923 25 10 1000 0.21
97 1 4 4250.524 25 10 1000 0.21
63 129 4 4255.475 25 10 1000 0.21
96 1 4 4250.763 25 10 1000 0.21
62 129 4 4256.027 25 10 1000 0.21
95 1 4 4251.001 25 10 1000 0.21
61 129 4 4256.579 25 10 1000 0.21
94 1 4 4251.241 25 10 1000 0.21
93 1 4 4251.488 25 10 1000 0.21
92 1 4 4251.729 25 10 1000 0.21
91 1 4 4251.97 25 10 1000 0.21
90 1 4 4252.212 25 10 1000 0.21
89 1 4 4252.468 25 10 1000 0.21
88 1 4 4252.711 25 10 1000 0.21
87 1 4 4252.955 25 10 1000 0.21
86 1 4 4253.2 25 10 1000 0.21
85 1 4 4253.464 25 10 1000 0.21
84 1 4 4253.709 25 10 1000 0.21
83 1 4 4253.955 25 10 1000 0.21
82 1 4 4254.202 25 10 1000 0.21
80 1 4 4254.473 25 10 1000 0.21
79 1 4 4254.72 25 10 1000 0.21
31

78 1 4 4254.967 25 10 1000 0.21
77 1 4 4255.246 25 10 1000 0.21
76 1 4 4255.493 25 10 1000 0.21
75 1 4 4255.741 25 10 1000 0.21
74 1 4 4255.99 25 10 1000 0.21
73 1 4 4256.275 25 10 1000 0.21
72 1 4 4256.523 25 10 1000 0.21
71 1 4 4256.772 25 10 1000 0.21
70 1 4 4257.021 25 10 1000 0.21
69 1 4 4257.312 25 10 1000 0.21
68 1 4 4257.561 25 10 1000 0.21
67 1 4 4257.81 25 10 1000 0.21
66 1 4 4258.058 25 10 1000 0.21
65 1 4 4258.356 25 10 1000 0.21
64 1 4 4258.604 25 10 1000 0.21
63 1 4 4258.852 25 10 1000 0.21
62 1 4 4259.156 25 10 1000 0.21
61 1 4 4259.403 25 10 1000 0.21
60 1 4 4259.651 25 10 1000 0.21
59 1 4 4259.898 25 10 1000 0.21
58 1 4 4260.207 25 10 1000 0.21
57 1 4 4260.453 25 10 1000 0.21
56 1 4 4260.699 25 10 1000 0.21
55 1 4 4260.944 25 10 1000 0.21
53 1 4 4261.258 25 10 1000 0.21
52 1 4 4261.746 25 10 1000 0.21
51 1 4 4261.99 25 10 1000 0.21
50 1 4 4262.065 25 10 1000 0.21
49 1 4 4262.308 25 10 1000 0.21
48 1 4 4262.55 25 10 1000 0.21
47 1 4 4262.792 25 10 1000 0.21
46 1 4 4263.114 25 10 1000 0.21
45 1 4 4263.354 25 10 1000 0.21
44 1 4 4263.594 25 10 1000 0.21
43 1 4 4263.832 25 10 1000 0.21
42 1 4 4264.159 25 10 1000 0.21
41 1 4 4264.396 25 10 1000 0.21
40 1 4 4264.632 25 10 1000 0.21
39 1 4 4264.867 25 10 1000 0.21
38 1 4 4265.196 25 10 1000 0.21
37 1 4 4265.429 25 10 1000 0.21
36 1 4 4265.661 25 10 1000 0.21
35 1 4 4265.995 25 10 1000 0.21
34 1 4 4266.225 25 10 1000 0.21
33 1 4 4266.454 25 10 1000 0.21
32

32 1 4 4266.681 25 10 1000 0.21
31 1 4 4267.017 25 10 1000 0.21
1 111 4 4289.816 25 10 1000 0.21
1 112 4 4289.804 25 10 1000 0.21
30 1 4 4267.243 25 10 1000 0.21
1 106 4 4290.243 25 10 1000 0.21
1 107 4 4290.271 25 10 1000 0.21
1 108 4 4290.291 25 10 1000 0.21
1 109 4 4290.302 25 10 1000 0.21
29 1 4 4267.467 25 10 1000 0.21
1 103 4 4290.565 25 10 1000 0.21
1 104 4 4290.622 25 10 1000 0.21
1 105 4 4290.671 25 10 1000 0.21
28 1 4 4267.689 25 10 1000 0.21
1 99 4 4290.695 25 10 1000 0.21
1 100 4 4290.787 25 10 1000 0.21
1 101 4 4290.872 25 10 1000 0.21
1 102 4 4290.949 25 10 1000 0.21
27 1 4 4268.027 25 10 1000 0.21
1 95 4 4290.674 25 10 1000 0.21
1 96 4 4290.799 25 10 1000 0.21
1 97 4 4290.916 25 10 1000 0.21
1 98 4 4291.027 25 10 1000 0.21
26 1 4 4268.248 25 10 1000 0.21
1 92 4 4290.666 25 10 1000 0.21
1 93 4 4290.814 25 10 1000 0.21
1 94 4 4290.956 25 10 1000 0.21
25 1 4 4268.466 25 10 1000 0.21
1 88 4 4290.402 25 10 1000 0.21
1 89 4 4290.577 25 10 1000 0.21
1 90 4 4290.747 25 10 1000 0.21
1 91 4 4290.911 25 10 1000 0.21
24 1 4 4268.684 25 10 1000 0.21
1 84 4 4290.015 25 10 1000 0.21
1 85 4 4290.216 25 10 1000 0.21
1 86 4 4290.412 25 10 1000 0.21
1 87 4 4290.602 25 10 1000 0.21
22 1 4 4269.023 25 10 1000 0.21
1 79 4 4289.518 25 10 1000 0.21
1 80 4 4289.742 25 10 1000 0.21
1 81 4 4289.961 25 10 1000 0.21
1 82 4 4290.175 25 10 1000 0.21
21 1 4 4269.238 25 10 1000 0.21
1 76 4 4289.165 25 10 1000 0.21
1 77 4 4289.404 25 10 1000 0.21
33

1 78 4 4289.64 25 10 1000 0.21
20 1 4 4269.45 25 10 1000 0.21
1 72 4 4288.496 25 10 1000 0.21
1 73 4 4288.754 25 10 1000 0.21
1 74 4 4289.009 25 10 1000 0.21
1 75 4 4289.26 25 10 1000 0.21
19 1 4 4269.793 25 10 1000 0.21
1 68 4 4287.747 25 10 1000 0.21
1 69 4 4288.021 25 10 1000 0.21
1 70 4 4288.292 25 10 1000 0.21
1 71 4 4288.559 25 10 1000 0.21
18 1 4 4270.003 25 10 1000 0.21
1 64 4 4286.929 25 10 1000 0.21
1 65 4 4287.215 25 10 1000 0.21
1 66 4 4287.5 25 10 1000 0.21
1 67 4 4287.782 25 10 1000 0.21
17 1 4 4270.211 25 10 1000 0.21
1 61 4 4286.348 25 10 1000 0.21
1 62 4 4286.644 25 10 1000 0.21
1 63 4 4286.937 25 10 1000 0.21
16 1 4 4270.417 25 10 1000 0.21
1 57 4 4285.431 25 10 1000 0.21
1 58 4 4285.735 25 10 1000 0.21
1 59 4 4286.038 25 10 1000 0.21
1 60 4 4286.339 25 10 1000 0.21
15 1 4 4270.761 25 10 1000 0.21
1 53 4 4284.474 25 10 1000 0.21
1 54 4 4284.784 25 10 1000 0.21
1 55 4 4285.402 25 10 1000 0.21
14 1 4 4270.964 25 10 1000 0.21
1 48 4 4283.489 25 10 1000 0.21
1 49 4 4283.802 25 10 1000 0.21
1 50 4 4284.115 25 10 1000 0.21
1 51 4 4284.428 25 10 1000 0.21
13 1 4 4271.165 25 10 1000 0.21
1 45 4 4282.8 25 10 1000 0.21
1 46 4 4283.114 25 10 1000 0.21
1 47 4 4283.429 25 10 1000 0.21
12 1 4 4271.365 25 10 1000 0.21
1 41 4 4281.788 25 10 1000 0.21
1 42 4 4282.102 25 10 1000 0.21
1 43 4 4282.416 25 10 1000 0.21
1 44 4 4282.731 25 10 1000 0.21
11 1 4 4271.709 25 10 1000 0.21
1 37 4 4280.778 25 10 1000 0.21
34

1 38 4 4281.088 25 10 1000 0.21
1 39 4 4281.399 25 10 1000 0.21
1 40 4 4281.712 25 10 1000 0.21
10 1 4 4271.905 25 10 1000 0.21
1 34 4 4280.084 25 10 1000 0.21
1 35 4 4280.39 25 10 1000 0.21
1 36 4 4280.697 25 10 1000 0.21
9 1 4 4272.099 25 10 1000 0.21
1 30 4 4279.101 25 10 1000 0.21
1 31 4 4279.398 25 10 1000 0.21
1 32 4 4279.698 25 10 1000 0.21
1 33 4 4280.001 25 10 1000 0.21
8 1 4 4272.291 25 10 1000 0.21
1 26 4 4278.149 25 10 1000 0.21
1 27 4 4278.436 25 10 1000 0.21
1 28 4 4278.726 25 10 1000 0.21
1 29 4 4279.019 25 10 1000 0.21
7 1 4 4272.635 25 10 1000 0.21
1 22 4 4277.24 25 10 1000 0.21
1 23 4 4277.791 25 10 1000 0.21
1 24 4 4278.072 25 10 1000 0.21
6 1 4 4272.823 25 10 1000 0.21
1 18 4 4276.643 25 10 1000 0.21
1 19 4 4276.905 25 10 1000 0.21
1 20 4 4277.171 25 10 1000 0.21
1 21 4 4277.441 25 10 1000 0.21
5 1 4 4273.01 25 10 1000 0.21
1 14 4 4275.833 25 10 1000 0.21
1 15 4 4276.077 25 10 1000 0.21
1 16 4 4276.326 25 10 1000 0.21
1 17 4 4276.58 25 10 1000 0.21
4 1 4 4273.355 25 10 1000 0.21
1 10 4 4275.097 25 10 1000 0.21
1 11 4 4275.32 25 10 1000 0.21
1 12 4 4275.55 25 10 1000 0.21
1 13 4 4275.784 25 10 1000 0.21
3 1 4 4273.537 25 10 1000 0.21
1 6 4 4274.444 25 10 1000 0.21
1 7 4 4274.645 25 10 1000 0.21
1 8 4 4274.851 25 10 1000 0.21
1 9 4 4275.064 25 10 1000 0.21
2 1 4 4273.717 25 10 1000 0.21
1 3 4 4274.061 25 10 1000 0.21
1 4 4 4274.243 25 10 1000 0.21
1 5 4 4274.431 25 10 1000 0.21
35

1 1 4 4273.896 25 10 1000 0.21
1 2 4 4274.064 25 10 1000 0.21
1 113 4 4289.772 25 10 1000 0.21
1 114 4 4289.747 25 10 1000 0.21
1 115 4 4289.697 25 10 1000 0.21
1 116 4 4289.647 25 10 1000 0.21
1 117 4 4289.597 25 10 1000 0.21
1 118 4 4289.547 25 10 1000 0.21
1 119 4 4289.497 25 10 1000 0.21
1 120 4 4289.447 25 10 1000 0.21
1 121 4 4289.397 25 10 1000 0.21
1 122 4 4289.347 25 10 1000 0.21
1 123 4 4289.297 25 10 1000 0.21
1 124 4 4289.247 25 10 1000 0.21
1 125 4 4289.197 25 10 1000 0.21
1 126 4 4289.147 25 10 1000 0.21
1 127 4 4289.097 25 10 1000 0.21
1 128 4 4289.047 25 10 1000 0.21
1 129 4 4289.011 25 10 1000 0.21
2 129 4 4288.508 25 10 1000 0.21
3 129 4 4287.958 25 10 1000 0.21
4 129 4 4287.408 25 10 1000 0.21
5 129 4 4286.858 25 10 1000 0.21
6 129 4 4286.308 25 10 1000 0.21
7 129 4 4285.759 25 10 1000 0.21
8 129 4 4285.209 25 10 1000 0.21
9 129 4 4284.659 25 10 1000 0.21
10 129 4 4284.109 25 10 1000 0.21
11 129 4 4283.559 25 10 1000 0.21
12 129 4 4283.009 25 10 1000 0.21
13 129 4 4282.459 25 10 1000 0.21
14 129 4 4281.91 25 10 1000 0.21
15 129 4 4281.36 25 10 1000 0.21
16 129 4 4280.81 25 10 1000 0.21
17 129 4 4280.26 25 10 1000 0.21
18 129 4 4279.71 25 10 1000 0.21
19 129 4 4279.16 25 10 1000 0.21
20 129 4 4278.611 25 10 1000 0.21
21 129 4 4278.061 25 10 1000 0.21
22 129 4 4277.511 25 10 1000 0.21
23 129 4 4276.961 25 10 1000 0.21
24 129 4 4276.411 25 10 1000 0.21
25 129 4 4275.861 25 10 1000 0.21
26 129 4 4275.311 25 10 1000 0.21
27 129 4 4274.762 25 10 1000 0.21
36

28 129 4 4274.212 25 10 1000 0.21
29 129 4 4273.662 25 10 1000 0.21
30 129 4 4273.112 25 10 1000 0.21
31 129 4 4272.562 25 10 1000 0.21
32 129 4 4272.012 25 10 1000 0.21
33 129 4 4271.462 25 10 1000 0.21
34 129 4 4270.913 25 10 1000 0.21
35 129 4 4270.363 25 10 1000 0.21
36 129 4 4269.813 25 10 1000 0.21
37 129 4 4269.263 25 10 1000 0.21
38 129 4 4268.713 25 10 1000 0.21
39 129 4 4268.163 25 10 1000 0.21
40 129 4 4267.613 25 10 1000 0.21
41 129 4 4267.064 25 10 1000 0.21
42 129 4 4266.514 25 10 1000 0.21
43 129 4 4265.964 25 10 1000 0.21
44 129 4 4265.414 25 10 1000 0.21
45 129 4 4264.864 25 10 1000 0.21
46 129 4 4264.314 25 10 1000 0.21
47 129 4 4263.764 25 10 1000 0.21
48 129 4 4263.215 25 10 1000 0.21
49 129 4 4262.665 25 10 1000 0.21
50 129 4 4262.115 25 10 1000 0.21
51 129 4 4261.565 25 10 1000 0.21
52 129 4 4261.015 25 10 1000 0.21
53 129 4 4260.465 25 10 1000 0.21
54 129 4 4259.915 25 10 1000 0.21
55 129 4 4259.366 25 10 1000 0.21
56 129 4 4258.816 25 10 1000 0.21
57 129 4 4258.266 25 10 1000 0.21
58 129 4 4257.716 25 10 1000 0.21
59 129 4 4257.166 25 10 1000 0.21
60 129 4 4256.696 25 10 1000 0.21

37

Appendix III

Groundwater Flow and Transport Modeling Electronic Files (DVD)

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

7 | 8 pages Groundwater Monitoring SAP, Rev. 1
March 2024

3.0 REPORTING

In addition to prompt notification of any upset conditions required by the License and the Permit, all
analytical data collected during the Facility groundwater monitoring program will be presented in
semi-annual reports. Reports shall be sent to:

State of Utah
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4810

3.1 Reporting Schedule
Routine Groundwater Monitoring Reports will be submitted semi-annually on the following Schedule.

Period Report Due on
1st (January through June) August 30
2nd (July through December) February 28

The decision flow chart identified in Figure 3-1 should be used to assess compliance monitoring
results. This decision flow chart is designed to be consistent with the requirements of the Permit for
assessment of monitoring results and notification of a confirmed exceedance of groundwater
compliance limits (GWCL).

3.2 Routine Reporting Requirements
All reporting requirements identified in the Permit shall be included in the semi-annual reports.
Regardless of the Permit reporting requirements, the following information will be included in the
semi-annual reports.

• Field Groundwater Sampling Data Forms and Instrument Calibration Forms from the monitoring
period.
• Measured groundwater level and elevation data from the monitoring period and a current
groundwater potentiometric surface map.
• All laboratory data reports.
• Description of QA and data validation results, performed in accordance with the approved QAP,
verifying the data quality and validity, including any corrective actions taken.
• Summary of the sampling event, noting any anomalous conditions or deviations from the Sampling
and Analysis Plan.
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

8 | 8 pages Groundwater Monitoring SAP, Rev. 1
March 2024

• Compliance analysis, addressing compliance with groundwater compliance limits (GWCL)
identified in the Permit.

3.3 Non-Routine Reporting Requirements
Non-routine reporting is required anytime the decision flow chart step 2D is not “yes”.

3.3.1 Possible Out-of-Compliance Status Reporting

If data review identifies that a compliance parameter from a point of compliance (POC) well exceeds
its respective GWCL, the following actions shall be taken as per the Permit.
• The laboratory should assess if there is an analytical or data reporting error.
o If not, the laboratory should determine if there is adequate sample volume that remains
within hold time limits for the relevant analyses.
▪ If so, the sample should be re-analyzed for the relevant parameters.
▪ If not, then a Probable Out-of-Compliance status condition exists
• Promptly resample the relevant wells for the relevant analyte(s).
• Immediately implement quarterly groundwater monitoring.
• Analyze the parameters that exceeded the GWCL.
• Notify the Executive Secretary of the possible out-of-compliance status
within 30 days of the initial detection, include the sampling results and
analytical reports.
• Report results of accelerated quarterly sampling as soon as they are
available, but not later than 30 days from the date the analytical data are
received from the laboratory.

3.3.2 Confirmed Out-of-Compliance Status Reporting

Out-of-Compliance status is confirmed by two consecutive valid analyses from POC well(s) above
the respective GWCL. If this condition occurs, the following actions shall be taken as per the Permit.
• Verbally notify the Executive Secretary of the Out-of-Compliance status within 24 hours of
receipt of data;
• Provide written notice within 5 days of the determination;
• Continue an accelerated schedule of ground water monitoring for the parameters that exceeded
GWCLs for at least two quarters or until the facility is brought into compliance.

Continue to report results of quarterly sampling as soon as they are available, but no later than 30 days
from the date the analytical data are received from the laboratory.

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

9 | 8 pages Groundwater Monitoring SAP, Rev. 1
March 2024

4.0 REFERENCES

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 1986. RCRA Groundwater Monitoring Technical
Enforcement Guidance Document. September.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 1992. EPA Test Methods for Evaluating Solid
Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, SW-846, Third Edition.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 1994. EPA Contract Laboratory Program National
Functional Guidelines for Organic and Inorganic Data Review.

Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Divisions of Radiation Control and Water Quality,
1999. Plateau Resources Limited Ground Water Quality Discharge Permit No. UGW170003.
Renewal dated January 14, 2004.

Wright Environmental Services, Inc. (WESI), 2013. Hydrogeologic Report 2013 Update
Shootaring Canyon Mill, Ticaboo, Utah. May.
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

Groundwater Monitoring SAP, Rev. 1
March 2024

TABLES
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

Groundwater Monitoring SAP, Rev. 1
March 2024
Table 2-1 Summary of Compliance Monitoring Wells and Data Collection
Well
Name
Data
Type
Record
Field
Parameters
(a)
Record
Stabilized
Field
Parameters
(b)
Sample
Method Well Purpose Frequency
RM1 L, S Yes Yes Submersible Upgradient of Facility Semi-Annual
RM2R L, S Yes Yes Submersible Operational (Ore Stockpile) Semi-Annual
POC 1 L, S Yes Yes Submersible POC-Tailings /Operations Semi-Annual
POC 2 L, S Yes Yes Submersible POC-Tailings /Operations Semi-Annual
POC 3 L, S Yes Yes Submersible POC-Tailings /Operations Semi-Annual
POC 4 L, S Yes Yes Submersible POC-Tailings /Operations Semi-Annual
POC 5 L, S Yes Yes Submersible POC-Tailings /Operations Semi-Annual
POC 6 L, S Yes Yes Submersible POC–Process Pond/Operations Semi-Annual
POC 7 L, S Yes Yes Submersible POC–Process Pond/Operations Semi-Annual
POC 8 L, S Yes Yes Submersible POC–Process Pond/Operations Semi-Annual
POC 9 L, S Yes Yes Submersible POC-Tailings/Post-Operations Semi-Annual
POC 10 L, S Yes Yes Submersible POC-Tailings/Post-Operations Semi-Annual
L - Groundwater level measurement
S – Groundwater quality sample collection and analysis
(a) Field parameters are static water level, pH, temperature and conductivity
(b) Stabilized field parameters are pH and conductivity

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

Groundwater Monitoring SAP, Rev. 1
March 2024

Table 2-2 Facility Well Construction Summary
Well Name
North
Coord.
South
Coord.
Casing
Diam.
(in)
Well
Total Depth
(ft) MP
Stick
up
(ft)
Measuring Point
Elev.
ft (MSL)
Slotted
Casing
ft (LSD)
Sand
Pack
ft (LSD)
Pump
Intake
ft (LSD)
RMl 59306.5 61826.7 3 487 2.3 4449.40 220-480 157-487 225
RM2R 57924.0 63142.4 5 300 1.2 4504.86 250-300 242-300 273
POC 1 * * 4* * 2* * (a) * *
POC 2 * * 4* * 2* * (a) * *
POC 3 * * 4* * 2* * (a) * *
POC 4 * * 4* * 2* * (a) * *
POC 5 * * 4* * 2* * (a) * *
POC 6 * * 4* * 2* * (a) * *
POC 7 * * 4* * 2* * (a) * *
POC 8 * * 4* * 2* * (a) * *
POC 9 * * 4* * 2* * (a) * *
POC 10 * * 4* * 2* * (a) * *
MP = from measuring point;
LSD = depth below land surface datum;
MSL = above mean sea level;
* = to be verified after installation of wells
Above data compiled from physical measurements, records and site surveys
(a) 50 ft screen length spanning the groundwater table in the uppermost aquifer
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

Groundwater Monitoring SAP, Rev. 1
March 2024

Table 2-3 Compliance Monitoring Program Groundwater Analyses

Parameter
Analysis
Frequency (a)

Laboratory Method (b)
Reporting
Limit (c)
Holding Time
(days)

Preservation Method
COMPLIANCE PARAMETERS
Ammonia as N Annual A4500-NH3 G, A4500-NH3 H, 350.1 0.1 28 H2SO4
Nitrate+Nitrite as N Annual E353.2, 9056 0.1 28 H2SO4
Arsenic, dissolved Annual E200.8, E200.7, 6010B 0.003 180 HNO3
Barium, dissolved Annual E200.8, E200.7, 6010B 0.1 180 HNO3
Cadmium, dissolved Annual E200.8, E200.7, 6010B 0.001 180 HNO3
Chromium, dissolved Annual E200.8, E200.7, 6010B 0.01 180 HNO3
Copper, dissolved Annual E200.8, E200.7, 6010B 0.01 180 HNO3
Lead, dissolved Annual E200.8, E200.7, 6010B 0.002 180 HNO3
Mercury, dissolved Annual E200.8, 7470A, E245.1 0.0002 28 HNO3
Molybdenum, dissolved Annual E200.8, E200.7, 6010B 0.005 180 HNO3
Selenium, dissolved Semi-Annual E200.8, E200.7, 6010B, 3114B 0.005 180 HNO3
Silver, dissolved Annual E200.8, E200.7, 6010B 0.005 180 HNO3
Uranium, dissolved Semi-Annual E200.8, 6020 0.0003 180 HNO3
Zinc, dissolved Annual E200.8, E200.7, 6010B 0.01 180 HNO3
Adjusted Gross Alpha, dissolved Annual E900.0, E903.1 3 pCi/L 180 HNO3
pH Semi-Annual N/A 0.1 s.u. Field None
Chloride Semi-Annual A4500-Cl B, A4500-Cl E, E300.0 1 28 Cool (d)
Fluoride Annual A4500-F C, E340.2, 9056, 9214, E300.0 0.1 28 Cool (d)
Sulfate Semi-Annual A4500-SO4 E, A4500-SO4 D, E375.4, 9056, E300.0 1 28 Cool (d)
Total Dissolved Solids Annual A2540-C 20 7 Cool (d)
Radium 226, dissolved Annual E903.0, E903.1 0.2 pCi/l N/A HNO3
NON-COMPLIANCE GROUNDWATER QUALITY PARAMETERS
Conductivity Semi-Annual N/A 1 µS/cm Field None
Temperature Semi-Annual N/A 1oC Field None
Bicarbonate Annual A2320 B, E310.1, E310.2 2 14 Cool (d)
Carbonate Annual A2320 B, E310.1, E310.2 2 14 Cool (d)
Calcium Annual E200.7, E200.8 1 180 HNO3
Magnesium Annual E200.7, E200.8 1 180 HNO3
Potassium Annual E200.7, E200.8 1 180 HNO3
Sodium Annual E200.7, E200.8 1 180 HNO3

(a)Laboratory Methods should be current USEPA methods, other methods for which the laboratory maintains current certification wi th the State of Utah and that meet the required reporting limits are acceptable. Prefix “A” notes Standard Methods and “E” notes USEPA laboratory method.
(b) Units are milligrams per liter (mg/l) except pH, conductivity, gross alpha and Ra 226.
(c) GWCL means Ground Water Compliance Limit in the Groundwater Discharge Permit, units are mg/l or pCi/L, as above.
(d) Cool means stored in an iced cooler to maintain 4ºC ± 2 ºC.
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

Groundwater Monitoring SAP, Rev. 1
March 2024

FIGURES

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

Groundwater Monitoring SAP, Rev. 1
March 2024

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

Groundwater Monitoring SAP, Rev. 1
March 2024

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

Groundwater Monitoring SAP, Rev. 1
March 2024

Figure 3-1 Groundwater Monitoring Compliance Decision Flow Chart

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

Groundwater Monitoring SAP, Rev. 1
March 2024

ATTACHMENT A
GROUNDWATER MONITORING QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN

SHOOTARING CANYON
URANIUM MILLING FACILITY
GROUNDWATER MONITORING
QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN

UTAH GROUND WATER QUALITY DISCHARGE PERMIT UGW170003
UTAH RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS LICENSE UT0900480

ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.

10808 S. River Front Parkway
Suite 321
South Jordan, Utah 84095

March 2024
Revision 4

Prepared By:
Wright Environmental Services Inc.

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

i | iii pages Groundwater Monitoring QAP, Rev 4
March 2024

SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM FACILITY
GROUNDWATER MONITORING QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN
Revision Summary

Revision Date Status
Original August 2006 Superseded
Rev 1 August 2009 Superseded
Rev 2 July 2010 Superseded
Rev 3 December 2011 Superseded
Rev 4 August 2014 Draft
Rev 4 June 2017 Draft
Rev 4 September 2018 Draft
Rev 4 May 2019 Draft
Rev 4 March 2024 Current
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

ii | iii pages Groundwater Monitoring QAP, Rev 4
March 2024

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................4
1.1 Regulatory Basis ............................................................................................................4
1.2 Purpose and Objective ...................................................................................................4
2.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE OBJECTIVES ..............................................................................5
2.1 Data Quality Objectives .................................................................................................5
2.2 Analytical Control Levels ..............................................................................................5
2.3 Data Quality Definition and Measurement ....................................................................5
2.3.1 Precision ............................................................................................................ 6
2.3.2 Accuracy ........................................................................................................... 7
2.3.3 Representativeness ............................................................................................ 7
2.3.4 Comparability ................................................................................................... 8
2.3.5 Completeness .................................................................................................... 8
3.0 SAMPLE PROCEDURES .......................................................................................................9
4.0 DATA REDUCTION, VALIDATION, AND REPORTING ..............................................10
4.1 Field Measurements .....................................................................................................10
4.2 Laboratory Data ...........................................................................................................10
4.3 Data Validation ............................................................................................................10
4.3.1 Field Sampling Validation ................................................................................ 10
4.3.2 Laboratory Data Package Validation ................................................................ 11
4.5 Data Reporting .............................................................................................................12
5.0 INTERNAL QUALITY CONTROL ....................................................................................13
5.1 Field Programs .............................................................................................................13
5.2 Laboratory Analysis .....................................................................................................13
6.0 PERFORMANCE SYSTEM AUDITS .................................................................................15
6.1 Field Programs .............................................................................................................15
6.2 Laboratory Audits ........................................................................................................15
7.0 CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ....................................................................................................16
7.1 Field Corrective Action................................................................................................16
7.2 Laboratory Corrective Action ......................................................................................17
7.3 Data Validation Corrective Action ..............................................................................17
9.0 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................19

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

iii | iii pages Groundwater Monitoring QAP, Rev 4
March 2024

TABLES

Table 2-1 Field Program Descriptions, Data Quality Objectives, and Analytical Levels
Table 3-1 Summary of Monitoring Wells and Data Collection
Table 3-2 Summary of Groundwater Monitoring Program Groundwater Analyses

FIGURES

Figure 1 Quality Assurance Plan Data Validation Decision Flow Chart
Figure 2 Groundwater Monitoring Compliance Decision Flow Chart

EXHIBITS

Exhibit 1 Data Validation Checklists
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

4 | 19 pages Groundwater Monitoring QAP, Rev 4
March 2024

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Anfield Resources Holding Corporation (Anfield) owns the Shootaring Canyon uranium milling
facility (Facility) near Ticaboo, Utah. This Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
is a required document as per Utah Ground Water Quality Discharge Permit UGW170003 (Permit)
and provides supporting information to the Shootaring Canyon Uranium Facility Groundwater
Monitoring Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP).

1.1 Regulatory Basis

The conditions of the Permit require routine groundwater compliance monitoring including sampling
and water level measurements from groundwater monitoring wells. This QAP must comply with the
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) publication titled RCRA Groundwater
Monitoring Technical Enforcement Guidance Document (September 1986). After Executive
Secretary approval, this QAP will become an enforceable document to the Permit.

1.2 Purpose and Objective

The purpose of this QAP is to describe the field collection and analytical methodology to be used for
existing groundwater monitoring and future compliance groundwater monitoring at the Facility as
outlined in the license amendment application. The objective of this QAP is to guide and control
sample collection actions and laboratory analyses such that the data produced are valid and reliable
and accurately represent the existing chemical and physical conditions of the Entrada aquifer beneath
the Facility.

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

5 | 19 pages Groundwater Monitoring QAP, Rev 4
March 2024

2.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE OBJECTIVES

2.1 Data Quality Objectives

The overall quality assurance objective for the groundwater monitoring program is to develop and
implement sampling, sample handling, and analytical procedures that will provide data that can be
used to fulfill the data quality objectives. Data quality objectives are qualitative and quantitative
statements that specify the field and laboratory data quality necessary to support specific decisions or
regulatory actions. The data quality objectives also establish numeric limits for the data to allow the
data user (or reviewers) to determine whether the data collected are of sufficient quality for their
intended use. A summary of the individual tasks and their associated data quality objectives for the
Facility compliance groundwater monitoring program are provided in Table 2-1.

2.2 Analytical Control Levels

Currently, five levels of analytical control are described in the EPA (1987) document Data Quality
Objectives for Remedial Response Activities Development Process. These levels are based on the type
of site, the project Data Quality Objectives, the end use of the analytical data, and the level of the
documentation. Two levels of documentation will be collected during compliance groundwater
monitoring at the Facility:

• Level I and Level II: data are qualitative or semi-qualitative data obtained by use of approved field
equipment such as groundwater quality parameter meters.
• Level III: data are quantitative, have known precision and accuracy, and are produced under
controlled conditions using laboratory-grade instrumentation. Should use EPA-accepted methods
or equivalent standard method under Level III.

Practical quantitation limits (PQLs) are based on the extent to which the equipment, laboratory or
field, or analytical process can provide accurate measurements of a reliable quality for specific
constituents in field samples. The PQL for a given analysis will vary depending on the laboratory
instrument sensitivity and matrix effects.

2.3 Data Quality Definition and Measurement

The effectiveness of a quality assurance (QA) program is measured by the quality of the data generated
in the field and by the laboratory. For compliance groundwater monitoring at the Facility, data quality
will be assessed in terms of its precision, accuracy, representativeness, comparability, and
completeness (the PARCC parameters). The laboratory performing the analysis will follow their
procedures for precision, accuracy, representativeness, comparability and completeness as per State
of Utah and/or National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference (NELAC) Certification.
These terms are described in the following subsections.
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

6 | 19 pages Groundwater Monitoring QAP, Rev 4
March 2024

2.3.1 Precision

Precision is the reproducibility of measurements under a given set of conditions. For large data sets,
precision is expressed as the variability of a group of measurements compared to their average value
(i.e., standard deviation). For duplicate measurements, precision is expressed as the relative percent
difference (RPD) of a data pair when the analytical results are greater than or equal to five times the
reporting limit and will be calculated using the following equation:

RPD = |𝐴−𝐵|
(𝐴+𝐵)
2
× 100

where A and B are the reported concentrations for primary and field duplicate analyses
or matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate samples, respectively

The relative difference (RD) of a data pair will be used to determine precision when the analytical
results of the primary sample and its field duplicate are less than five times the reporting limit. The
RD will be calculated using the following equation:

RD = |D1−D2|
DL

where: RD = Relative Difference
D1 = Sample value
D2 = Duplicate sample value
DL = Detection Limit or Reporting Limit

For radionuclide laboratory results, if a duplicated sample measurement has an activity that is less than
five times the radionuclide detection limit, and exceeds 20 percent RPD when compared to the first
measurement for the sample, it may be evaluated using replicate error ratio (RER) of the two
measurements. For radionuclide field duplicates, precision will be evaluated using the RER of the
two measurement. The RER of two measurements is an assessment of whether they are within two
standard deviations of their aggregate measurement uncertainty of each other. The RER is calculated
using the following formula:

RER = ()22
BASS
BA
+
−

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

7 | 19 pages Groundwater Monitoring QAP, Rev 4
March 2024

where;
A = Net Activity of primary sample
B = Net Activity of the field duplicate sample.

sA = The uncertainty of the primary sample
sB = The uncertainty of the field duplicate sample

(Manual for the Certification of Laboratories Analyzing Drinking Water; Criteria and Procedures
Quality Assurance. Fifth Edition, EPA 815-R-05-004. January 2005, section 7.7.1, p. VI-9). If the
RER is less than or equal to two, then the two measurements are within two standard deviations of
each other, and so are acceptable. If the RER exceeds two, it is unacceptable since it means there is
greater than two standard deviations of difference between the two measurements (see Section 4.3).

2.3.2 Accuracy

Accuracy is the degree of agreement of a measurement or an average of measurements with an
accepted reference or “true” value, and is a measure of bias in the system. The accuracy of a
measurement system is impacted by errors introduced through the sampling process, field
contamination, preservation, handling, sample matrix, sample preparation, and analytical techniques.

Accuracy will be evaluated by the following equation:

Percent Recovery = 100−
C
BA

where: A is the concentration of analyte in a spiked sample
B is the concentration of analyte in an unspiked sample
C is the concentration of spike added.

False positive or high-biased sample results will be assessed by evaluating results from equipment
rinsate samples, if applicable. A range of 80% to 120% recovery will typically be the criteria for
acceptable accuracy, unless justified by the laboratory or analytical method.

2.3.3 Sensitivity
Sensitivity is a quantitative metric representing minimum concentration that can be reliably
measured or reported. Instrument and method sensitivities must be below the groundwater
protection standards to allow reliable assessment of groundwater compliance. The maximum
sensitivity requirements for this plan are identified Table 3-2 as the Reporting Limits.

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

8 | 19 pages Groundwater Monitoring QAP, Rev 4
March 2024

2.3.4 Representativeness

Representativeness is a qualitative expression of the degree to which sample data accurately and
precisely represent a characteristic of a population, a sampling point, or an environmental condition.
Representativeness is maximized by ensuring that, for a given project, the number and location of
sampling points and the sample collection and analysis techniques are appropriate for the specific
investigation, and that the sampling and analysis program will provide information that reflects “true”
site conditions. No numerical criteria for representativeness are proposed, best professional judgement
will be applied when assessing if data are representative of a data population, a sampling point, or an
environmental condition.

2.3.5 Comparability

Comparability is a qualitative parameter that expresses the confidence with which one data set may be
compared to another. Comparability is dependent on similar objectives and is achieved through the
use of standardized methods for sample collection and analysis, and the use of standardized units of
measure. Data sets will contain the same variables of interest. Measuring devices will have similar
detection limits. To the extent practicable, the number of observations will be the same order of
magnitude for each monitoring location and each monitoring period. No numerical criteria for
comparability are proposed, best professional judgement will be applied when comparing individual
values and data sets.

2.3.6 Completeness

Completeness is defined as the percentage of valid data relative to the total number of measurements.
Completeness for this project will be calculated using the following equation:

Completeness =

Where the number of valid measurements is the total number of valid analytical measurements based
on the precision, accuracy, and holding time evaluation. Project completeness is determined at the
conclusion of the data validation and is calculated by dividing the number of valid sample resul ts by
the total number of sample analyses listed in the QAP. No numerical criteria for minimum
completeness is proposed, the goal is for 100% data completeness.

100tsmeasuremenofnumbertotal
tsmeasuremenvalidofNumber
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

9 | 19 pages Groundwater Monitoring QAP, Rev 4
March 2024

3.0 SAMPLE PROCEDURES

The current monitoring network and the future compliance groundwater monitoring program will
consist of water depth measurement and sample collection semi-annually for a short list of parameters
(chloride, selenium, sulfate, and uranium) and sampled annually for the long list of parameters (Table
3-2) from nine wells. Table 3-1 below presents a synopsis of the sampling points included in the
monitoring program.

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

10 | 19 pages Groundwater Monitoring QAP, Rev 4
March 2024

4.0 DATA REDUCTION, VALIDATION, AND REPORTING

4.1 Field Measurements

Raw data from the field measurements and sample collection activities will be recorded in the field
logbook and the appropriate forms. All field data generated during this program will be reviewed
under the direction of Anfield’s Corporate Radiation Safety Officer or designee (CRSO). The dates,
corresponding water depths and measuring point elevations will be used to calculate measured
groundwater elevations.

4.2 Laboratory Data

Data will be reduced as specified by the analytical methods and the laboratory QAP and SOPs before
data are released to Anfield. The laboratory QAP and SOPs can be reviewed in the laboratory office.
The Utah certified laboratory performing the analyses will follow its approved laboratory QAP and
applicable SOPs.

In order to allow maximum flexibility in selecting the most appropriate and cost-effective laboratory
and minimal burden for modifying this QAP when changing laboratories, a specific laboratory is not
identified and the related laboratory QAP is not appended to this document. A copy of the laboratory
QAP for the certified laboratory selected for a given sampling event will be submitted once to Utah
Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) for review no less than 30 days prior to sampling. The
laboratory QAP will not be re-submitted for subsequent sampling events using the same laboratory.
If a different laboratory is used, a new laboratory QAP will be provided to DEQ. Only laboratories
with current Utah certification for all the required parameters will be used.

The laboratory is also responsible for assessing the data quality and qualifying any data that may be
unreliable. The laboratory will prepare and retain full analytical and QC documentation. During the
Laboratory data reduction and review the laboratory shall notify Anfield if they find excess holding
time or precision or accuracy problems demonstrated by spike duplicates or matrix spikes.

4.3 Data Validation
Data validation will follow the process described below and as illustrated in the data validation
decision flow chart presented in Figure 1. The data validation results will be documented on the QAP
checklists included as Exhibit 1.

4.3.1 Field Sampling Validation
The first step in data validation assesses the adequacy of sample collection (Step 1 of Data Validation
Decision Flow Chart in Figure 1). This includes verifying the following information from the field
sampling data sheets, and documenting this review on the QAP Field Sampling Checklist (Exhibit 1).
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

11 | 19 pages Groundwater Monitoring QAP, Rev 4
March 2024

• Field water quality parameter meter field function checks were performed.
• Meter field function check was documented.
• Meter function was field verified to be within the SAP limits.
• Water level was recorded to nearest 0.01 feet.
• Well casing volume was correctly calculated based on well construction data and measured
water level.
• The well pumping rate and the total purge volume pumped during well purging were
correctly calculated and documented.
• The well purge water stabilization parameters were recorded at or above the appropriate
minimum frequency interval.
• The well purge water stabilization parameters met the stability criteria as per the SAP.
• Sufficient minimum well purge volume was pumped.
• The appropriate sample bottles were filled and the appropriate preservatives used.

If any errors or omissions in the Groundwater Sampling Data Forms that can be corrected
administratively and which, when corrected, do not result in the failure of any other QAP sampling
requirement (e.g., adequate purge volumes, purge water stability testing frequency or stability criteria
being met), shall be corrected on the field forms and initialed by the QA/QC reviewer.

If any errors or omissions in the Groundwater Sampling Data Forms that can be corrected
administratively and which, when corrected, do result in the failure of any other QAP sampling
requirement, the affected sample data are to be rejected and the appropriate wells re-sampled. If the
sampling period has ended before re-sampling is accomplished, the DEQ shall be notified within 30
days of determining the status of the results.

4.3.2 Laboratory Data Package Validation
Laboratory data validation includes assessing the data package for completeness and assessing the
quality of the data itself. These validation steps are guided by and documented using the Data
Completeness and Data Package QA/QC Checklist (see Exhibit 1). The laboratory will be contacted
regarding accurate reporting of the data before implementing any corrective action.

Data Package Completeness (Steps 2 through 7 of data validation decision flow chart):
The data package completeness validation includes verification of the following items and
implementation of the appropriate action as per the validation decision flow chart.
• Step 2: Verify current laboratory certification.
• Step 3: Verify complete chain-of-custody.
• Step 4: Verify appropriate sample temperature, ≤ 6 degrees C.
• Step 5: Verify dates of all analysis within holding times.
• Step 6: Verify laboratory QA\QC summary report present.
• Step 7: Verify all samples sent have a complete set of reported analyses (Table 3-2).
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

12 | 19 pages Groundwater Monitoring QAP, Rev 4
March 2024

If identified errors or omissions can be corrected administratively and without impact to sample
integrity and quality then they should be corrected and the corrections noted in the sample file.

If identified errors or omissions cannot be corrected administratively and without impact to sample
integrity and quality the affected sample data are to be rejected and the appropriate wells re-sampled.

Lab Data QA/QC (Steps 8 through 13 of data validation decision flow chart):
The lab data QA/QC validation includes verification of the following items and implementation of the
appropriate action as per the validation decision flow chart.
• Step 8: All methods as identified in Table 3-2.
• Step 9: All lab blank results below lab reporting limits in Table 3-2 or less than 5 times compliance
sample reported concentrations.
• Step 10: Lab QA criteria met.
• Step 11: Reporting limits less than approved Table 3-2 or less than compliance sample
reported concentrations.
• Step 12: Non-radionuclides; blind field duplicate measure of precision.
o Blind field duplicate/primary sample RPD values <20%; or, if one or more of the
sample results are < 5 times the Table 3-2 reporting limit, then primary/duplicate RD
less than 1.
o If one or both results are below the approved Table 3-2 reporting limit then no RPD is
calculated.
• Step 13: Radionuclides; Blind field duplicate measure of precision.
o Blind field duplicate/primary sample RER values <2.
o If both results are below the approved Table 3-2 minimum detectable concentration
(MDC) then no RER is calculated.

If re-sampling is required but not possible within the reporting period and data are rejected, the DEQ
shall be notified within 30 days of determining status of analytical results.

4.5 Data Reporting

The field forms and the chain-of-custody copy will be placed in the correct files. When the data report
is received from the laboratory, evaluate the data package using the checklists included in Exhibit 1.
Review all information received for anomalies, errors or problems. Communicate with the laboratory
if problems or errors are encountered.

All QA/QC issues and associated corrective actions shall be documented in the semi-annual reports as
required in the Permit.

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

13 | 19 pages Groundwater Monitoring QAP, Rev 4
March 2024

5.0 INTERNAL QUALITY CONTROL

5.1 Field Programs

Internal quality control evaluates whether a method is performing within acceptable limits of precision
and accuracy. On the sampling level, quality control samples used to assess field-sampling techniques
and environmental conditions during sample collection and transportation include blind duplicates.

Blind duplicate samples will be used to assess variability in the sample media and to assess sampling
and analytical precision. One blind duplicate sample will be collected per sample event.

5.2 Laboratory Analysis
Laboratory quality control consists of two distinct components: a laboratory component and media
component. The laboratory components measure the performance of the laboratory analytical
processes during sample analyses. Laboratory components include holding time, method blanks, and
laboratory control samples. Media components measure the effects of a specific media (i.e., water)
on the method performance and include matrix spikes, matrix spike duplicates, and surrogate spikes.

The general objectives of the QC program are to:

• Ensure that all analytical procedures are documented, including any changes in
administrative and/or technical procedures. A file containing memoranda describing all
changes in administrative and/or technical procedures will be maintained.
• Ensure that all analytical procedures are validated and conducted according to method
guidelines and status of laboratory certification for analytical methods used. To satisfy this
objective, the continued laboratory certification will be confirmed prior to each sampling
event, and the reporting of the results reviewed to insure the correct methods are used.
• Monitor the performance of the laboratory using a systematic inspection program. In addition
to reliance on the Utah laboratory certification, the data will be reviewed after each sampling
event to detect anomalies or unlikely trends.
• Ensure that all data are properly archived. Paper copies of the sampling results will be
maintained at the Facility and electronic copies will be maintained in a water quality
database.
• Ensure holding times are met. See corrective actions below in the event of an exceedance.
• Prevent excessive minimum detection limits (MDL). See corrective action below in the
event of unsatisfactory MDL.
• Groundwater data will be compared with groundwater compliance limit (GWCL) identified
in the Permit.
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

14 | 19 pages Groundwater Monitoring QAP, Rev 4
March 2024

Corrective actions that will be taken by Anfield in the event that one or more of the cited QC objectives
is not met are identified in the validation flow chart (Figure 1) and as follows:

• If the laboratory is not certified in Utah then locate a second laboratory that is certified and
that can perform the required analysis at an acceptable cost.
• Should the laboratory not utilize an analytical method for which it is certified, then request analysis
utilizing an approved analytical method identified in the SAP for which it is certified.
• Should poor comparability occur with field duplicates, then review field notes, laboratory
procedures and handling of sample to determine the reason for the difference.
• Should the reporting limit be greater than specified in Table 3-2 and the analytical result is
reported below the Table 3-2 reporting limit then request the laboratory run another analysis
at the correct reporting limit, or alternatively, resample the well and have the analysis
performed at the correct reporting limit.
• If a laboratory fails on repeated instances to meet one or more of the stated laboratory
analysis QC objectives, a second laboratory that is certified in Utah to perform the required
analysis will be used. The second laboratory will be used either in lieu of or in combination
with the first laboratory, as a means of verifying or refuting results from the first laboratory,
for certain sample analyses, and until any required corrective actions are undertaken and
successfully implemented at the first laboratory. If results for the same sampling event for
any constituent from two Utah certified labs have a RPD of greater than 30% or RER of
greater than two, DEQ will be notified and consulted regarding how to proceed with
groundwater analyses.
• Any results from split or duplicate samples collected by Facility staff from a Utah certified
laboratory that meet the reporting limit requirements in Table 3-2, the QA\QC requirements
of this QAP and the QA\QC requirements of the laboratory QAP, shall be deemed acceptable
for the purposes of meeting the requirements of the Ground Water Discharge Permit as valid
data.

All contract laboratories will conduct internal quality control for analytical services in accordance to
NELAC standards.

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

15 | 19 pages Groundwater Monitoring QAP, Rev 4
March 2024

6.0 PERFORMANCE SYSTEM AUDITS

6.1 Field Programs

Oversight of the field procedures will be the direct responsibility of the CRSO who will review all
elements of the QAP to ensure that the objectives of the monitoring are met. In addition to an initial
review, the sampling procedures will be reviewed regularly so that any necessary modifications can
be made.

The CRSO will conduct internal audits of field activities (sampling and measurements). The audits
will include examining field measurement records, field equipment calibration records, field sampling
records, field instrument operation records, sample collection procedures, sample handling and
shipping procedures, and chain-of-custody procedures. The audit will also include a check on the
accuracy of data transfer from the laboratory records into the required reports. Field activities will be
audited immediately after the approval of this QAP to verify that all the procedures in the QAP are
being followed. Follow-up audits will be conducted on a periodic basis to correct deficiencies, and to
verify that QA procedures are maintained throughout the project. A report of the audit will be kept in
the files at the Facility.

The regulatory agencies such as Utah DEQ, may conduct external field audits. Field audits may be
conducted at any time during the field operations and will be based upon the information present in
the QAP. The audits may or may not be announced at the discretion of the regulatory agencies.

6.2 Laboratory Audits

In-house and regulatory agency audits of laboratory systems and performance are a regular part of a
laboratory QC program and are outlined in the laboratory’s QA/QC plan. The audits consist of a
review of the entire laboratory system and at a minimum, include examination of sample receiving;
sample log-in; sample storage; sample chain-of-custody documentation procedures; sample
preparation and analysis; and instrumentation procedures.

External audits may be performed by regulatory agency or Anfield personnel prior to or during field
activities to verify proper implementation of laboratory procedures and adherence to this QAP. These
audits may or may not be announced and are conducted at the discretion of the auditing agency.
External audits may include but are not limited to review of laboratory analytical procedures,
laboratory on-site audits, and/or submission of performance evaluation samples to the laboratory for
analysis.

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

16 | 19 pages Groundwater Monitoring QAP, Rev 4
March 2024

7.0 CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

Corrective action is the process of identifying, recommending, approving, and implementing measures
to counter unacceptable procedures or out-of-quality-control performance that may affect the data
quality. All proposed and implemented corrective action will be documented as part of the data
validation to the appropriate project management. The CRSO will implement corrective actions only
after concurrence from the DEQ. If immediate corrective action is required, approvals secured by
telephone from the CRSO will be documented in an additional memorandum to the DWMRC.

For each noncompliance, a formal corrective action program will be established and implemented at
the time the problem is identified. The person who identifies the problem will be responsible for
notifying the CRSO, who in turn will notify the DEQ Project Manager. Implementation of the
corrective action will be confirmed in writing as described previously.

Any nonconformance with the established QC procedures specified in this QAP will be identified and
corrected in accordance with the QAP. Field corrective actions will be implemented and documented
in the field logbook. No Anfield staff member will initiate a corrective action without prior
communication of findings through the proper communication channels. If corrective actions are
determined to be insufficient, the appropriate personnel may issue a stop work order until the problem
can be resolved.

7.1 Field Corrective Action

During any field activity, the field staff will be responsible for documenting and reporting all suspected
technical and QA non-conformances and suspected deficiencies. The non-conformances and/or
deficiencies will be documented in the field logbook and reported to the CRSO. If the problem is
associated with the field measurements or sampling equipment, the field staff will take the appropriate
steps to correct the problem. Typical field procedures to correct problems include the following:

• Repeating the measurement to check for error.
• Making sure the meters or instruments are adjusted properly for the ambient conditions, such as
temperature.
• Checking, recharging, or replacing batteries.
• Re-calibrating instruments.
• Replacing the meters or instruments used to measure field parameters.
• Stopping the work until the problem is corrected (if necessary).

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

17 | 19 pages Groundwater Monitoring QAP, Rev 4
March 2024

If a non-conformance or problem requires a major adjustment to the field procedures as outlined in
this QAP (e.g., changing sampling methodology), the CRSO, in conjunction with the DEQ Project
Manager, will be responsible for initiating corrective actions. Modification to or replacement of the
QAP to address major changes in field procedures will be done with concurrence by CRSO and DEQ
project manager.

7.2 Laboratory Corrective Action

Corrective actions are required whenever unreliable analytical results prevent the quality control as
specified by the method or the laboratory QAP from being met. The corrective action that is taken
depends on the analysis and the nonconformance. The NELAC provides an outline of the corrective
actions that will be taken for problems associated with specific laboratory analyses.

7.3 Data Validation Corrective Action
Corrective actions may be initiated during data validation or data assessment as identified in the data
validation decision flow chart (Figure 1). Always check with the laboratory regarding accurate
reporting of the data before implementing any corrective action.

Potential corrective actions may include requesting re-sampling by the field team or reanalysis of
samples by the laboratory. These actions are dependent upon the ability to mobilize the field team,
how critical the data are to the project data quality objectives, or whether the samples are still within
holding time. When data validation identifies a situation requiring corrective action, the CRSO will
be notified and has final responsibility for authorizing the implementation of the corrective action,
including re-sampling. The CRSO will document and notify the DEQ of all corrective actions of this
type in the semi-annual reports.

The groundwater compliance decision tree identified in Figure 2 is designed to be consistent with the
requirements of the Permit for assessment of monitoring results and notification of a probable and
confirmed GWCL exceedance. The decision tree identified in Figure 2 should be used to assess
validated monitoring results.
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

18 | 19 pages Groundwater Monitoring QAP, Rev 4
March 2024

8.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORTS

All of the analytical data collected during the Facility groundwater compliance program, which starts
after the supplemental background data collection, will be presented in semi -annual reports by the
required reporting dates, as required by the Ground Water Quality Discharge Permit. Semi-annual
reports summarizing results obtained will be submitted. All information required by the Groundwater
Quality Discharge Permit including laboratory analytical data reports will be included in the
semi-annual reports.

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

19 | 19 pages Groundwater Monitoring QAP, Rev 4
March 2024

`
9.0 REFERENCES

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 1986. RCRA Ground Water Monitoring Technical
Enforcement Guidance Document.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 1992. EPA Test Methods for Evaluating Solid
Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, SW-846, Third Edition.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 1994. EPA Contract Laboratory Program National
Functional Guidelines for Organic and Inorganic Data Review.

Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Divisions of Radiation Control and Water Quality,
1999. Plateau Resources Limited Ground Water Quality Discharge Permit No. UGW170003.
Renewal dated January 14, 2004.
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

Groundwater Monitoring QAP, Rev 4
March 2024

TABLES

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

Groundwater Monitoring QAP, Rev 4
March 2024

Table 2-1 Field Program Descriptions, Data Quality Objectives, and Analytical Levels
Field Program Description Data Quality Objective Analytical Level(a)
Groundwater Elevation Measurements
(feet above NGVD (e))
Assess groundwater flow paths,
calculate hydraulic gradients for
modeling purposes, and calculate
pre-sample purge volumes.
Level I
Groundwater Sampling Assess water quality of specific
parameters in Entrada groundwater
to determine background
concentrations, set or revise
GWCLs, assess geochemical and
hydrogeologic conditions at the
facility, and monitor compliance of
GWCLs.
Level II(b) to assess stability of
groundwater prior to sampling
and assess groundwater
characteristics over time.

Level III(c) to supplement
existing background
concentrations, GWCL(d)s, and
compliance monitoring of
GWCLs.
(a) Data Levels I and II indicate field measurements; Level III indicates EPA approved methods and protocol will be used for analysis.
(b) pH and specific conductivity.
(c) EPA test methods for evaluating solid waste, physical/chemical methods.
(d) GWCL = groundwater compliance limit.
(e) NGVD = National Geodetic Vertical Datum.

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

Groundwater Monitoring QAP, Rev 4
March 2024

Table 3-1 Summary of Monitoring Wells and Data Collection
Well
Name
Data
Type
Record
Field
Parameters
(a)
Record
Stabilized
Field
Parameters
(b)
Sample
Method Well Purpose Frequency
Existing Monitoring Locations
RM1 L, S Yes Yes Submersible Upgradient Quarterly
RM2R L, S Yes Yes Submersible Ore Stockpile Quarterly
RM7 L, S Yes Yes Submersible Monitoring Quarterly
RM12 L No No Submersible Monitoring Quarterly
RM14 L, S Yes Yes Submersible Monitoring Quarterly
RM18 L, S Yes Yes Submersible Monitoring Quarterly
RM19 L, S Yes Yes Submersible Monitoring Quarterly
Tailings
Sump
S No No Grab Source Annual
Future Monitoring Locations
RM1 L, S Yes Yes Submersible Up Gradient Semi-Annual
RM2R L, S Yes Yes Submersible Operational (Ore Stockpile) Semi-Annual
POC 1 L, S Yes Yes Submersible POC-Tailings /Operations Semi-Annual
POC 2 L, S Yes Yes Submersible POC-Tailings /Operations Semi-Annual
POC 3 L, S Yes Yes Submersible POC-Tailings /Operations Semi-Annual
POC 4 L, S Yes Yes Submersible POC-Tailings /Operations Semi-Annual
POC 5 L, S Yes Yes Submersible POC-Tailings /Operations Semi-Annual
POC 6 L, S Yes Yes Submersible POC–Process Pond/Operations Semi-Annual
POC 7 L, S Yes Yes Submersible POC–Process Pond/Operations Semi-Annual
POC 8 L, S Yes Yes Submersible POC–Process Pond/Operations Semi-Annual
POC 9 L, S Yes Yes Submersible POC-Tailings/Post-Operations Semi-Annual
POC 10 L, S Yes Yes Submersible POC-Tailings/Post-Operations Semi-Annual
L - Groundwater level measurement
S – Water quality sample collection and analysis
(a) Field parameters are static water level, pH, temperature and conductivity
(b) Stabilized field parameters are pH and conductivity
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

Groundwater Monitoring QAP, Rev 4
March 2024

Table 3-2 Summary of Groundwater Monitoring Analyses

Parameter
Analysis
Frequency (a)

Laboratory Method (b)
Reporting
Limit (c)
Holding Time
(days)

Preservation Method
COMPLIANCE PARAMETERS
Ammonia as N Annual A4500-NH3 G, A4500-NH3 H, 350.1 0.10 28 H2SO4
Nitrate+Nitrite as N Annual E353.2, 9056 0.1 28 H2SO4
Arsenic, dissolved Annual E200.8, E200.7, 6010B 0.003 180 HNO3
Barium, dissolved Annual E200.8, E200.7, 6010B 0.1 180 HNO3
Cadmium, dissolved Annual E200.8, E200.7, 6010B 0.001 180 HNO3
Chromium, dissolved Annual E200.8, E200.7, 6010B 0.01 180 HNO3
Copper, dissolved Annual E200.8, E200.7, 6010B 0.01 180 HNO3
Lead, dissolved Annual E200.8, E200.7, 6010B 0.002 180 HNO3
Mercury, dissolved Annual E200.8, 7470A, E245.1 0.0002 28 HNO3
Molybdenum, dissolved Annual E200.8, E200.7, 6010B 0.005 180 HNO3
Selenium, dissolved Semi-Annual E200.8, E200.7, 6010B, 3114B 0.005 180 HNO3
Silver, dissolved Annual E200.8, E200.7, 6010B 0.005 180 HNO3
Uranium, dissolved Semi-Annual E200.8, 6020 0.0003 180 HNO3
Zinc, dissolved Annual E200.8, E200.7, 6010B 0.01 180 HNO3
Adjusted Gross Alpha, dissolved Annual E900.0, E903.1 3 pCi/L 180 HNO3
pH Semi-Annual N/A 0.1 s.u. Field None
Chloride Semi-Annual A4500-Cl B, A4500-Cl E, E300.0 1 28 Cool (d)
Fluoride Annual A4500-F C, E340.2, 9056, 9214, E300.0 0.1 28 Cool (d)
Sulfate Semi-Annual A4500-SO4 E, A4500-SO4 D, E375.4, 9056, E300.0 1 28 Cool (d)
Total Dissolved Solids Annual A2540-C 20 7 Cool (d)
Radium 226, dissolved Annual E903.0, E903.1 0.2 pCi/l N/A HNO3
NON-COMPLIANCE GROUNDWATER QUALITY PARAMETERS
Conductivity Semi-Annual N/A 1 µS/cm Field None
Temperature Semi-Annual N/A 1oC Field None
Bicarbonate Annual A2320 B, E310.1, E310.2 2 14 Cool (d)
Carbonate Annual A2320 B, E310.1, E310.2 2 14 Cool (d)
Calcium Annual E200.7, E200.8 1 180 HNO3
Magnesium Annual E200.7, E200.8 1 180 HNO3
Potassium Annual E200.7, E200.8 1 180 HNO3
Sodium Annual E200.7, E200.8 1 180 HNO3
(a) Annual sampling and analysis shall include all parameters identified as annual and semi-annual.
(b)Laboratory Methods should be current USEPA methods, other methods for which the laboratory maintains current certification with the State of Utah and that meet the required reporting limits are acceptable.
Prefix “A” notes Standard Methods and “E” notes USEPA laboratory method.
(c) Units are milligrams per liter (mg/l) except pH, conductivity, gross alpha and Ra 226.(d) Cool means stored in an iced cooler to maintain < 6ºC.
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

Groundwater Monitoring QAP, Rev 4
March 2024

FIGURES

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

Groundwater Monitoring QAP, Rev 4
March 2024

Figure 1 Groundwater Monitoring Data Validation Flow Chart

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

Groundwater Monitoring QAP, Rev 4
March 2024

Figure 2 Groundwater Monitoring Compliance Decision Flow Chart

Groundwater Monitoring QAP, Rev 4
March 2024

EXHIBIT

Groundwater Monitoring QAP, Rev 4
March 2024

EXHIBIT 1
DATA VALIDATION CHECKLISTS
SHOOTARING CANYON MILL GROUND WATER MONITORING PROGRAM
QAP PRE-SAMPLING AND SHIPPING CHECKLIST
Sample Collection Date:
Reviewer\Date:
Pre-Sampling YES NO
Lab certification still current?
Calibration standards within expiration?
Meter Calibration adequate & documented?
Shipping YES NO
Chain of Custody complete? (retain pink copy)
Request for analyses complete?
All forms in sealed zip lock bag?
All samples labeled appropriately (info & non-run ink?)
All labels taped w/clear tape?
Samples maintained @ 4oC ± 2oC since sampling?
Sufficient ice\ice packs in cooler?
Custody Seal on coolers?
SHOOTARING CANYON MILL GROUND WATER MONITORING PROGRAM
QAP FIELD SAMPLING CHECKLIST
Sample Collection Date:
Reviewer\Date:
RM-100
Field Sampling YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO
Meter function check OK & Recorded?
Water level recorded to 0.01 feet?
Well casing volume correctly calculated?
Pumping rate determined and recorded?
Field Parameter Stabilization
Minimum interval achieved?
3 readings with pH ± 0.1 s.u.; Conductivity ± 10% ?
Sufficient minumum well volume pumped?
Sample bottles & preservatives correct and recorded?
COMMENTS
RM-1
RM-2R
RM-7
RM-8
RM-12
RM-14
RM-18
RM-19 Blind Field Dup as RM-100
RM-20
DUP
Tails
RM-1 RM-2R RM-7 RM-8 RM-20 Blind DupRM-12 RM-14 RM-18 RM-19 Tails Sump
Z:\public\Uranium One\Shootaring\Permit licenses etc\Groundwater\2013 Renewal\Revisions\QAP\QA sheets Generic Field QA 1
SHOOTARING CANYON MILL GROUND WATER MONITORING PROGRAM
QAP DATA COMPLETENESS & DATA PACKAGE QA/QC CHECKLIST
Sample Collection Date: Report Date\Work Order No.:
Reviewer\Date:
Data Completeness YES NO YES NO
Lab certification still current?Is Lab QA\QC summary report present?
Is receipt temperature, between 0.1 and 6 degrees C? Do all samples sent have reported analyses (QAP Table 3)?
Chain of Custody complete and intact as per approved QAP? Were all analytes requested reported (QAP Table 3)?
Received w/ custody seals intact?Are all field forms present from field site?
RM-100
Data Package QA\QC YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO
Are all reporting limits ≤ QAP Table 3?
Are all methods as per QAP Table 3?
Are dates of all analysis within holding times?
COMMENTS
RM-1
RM-2R
RM-7
RM-8
RM-12
RM-14
RM-18
Blind DupRM-1 RM-2R RM-7 RM-8 RM-12 RM-14 RM-18 RM-19 RM-20 Tails Sump
Z:\public\Uranium One\Shootaring\Permit licenses etc\Groundwater\2013 Renewal\Revisions\QAP\QA sheets Generic QA 1
SHOOTARING CANYON MILL GROUND WATER MONITORING PROGRAM
QAP DATA COMPLETENESS & DATA PACKAGE QA/QC CHECKLIST
Sample Collection Date: Report Date\Work Order No.:
Reviewer\Date:
RM-19
RM-20
DUP
(RM-100); duplicate of RM-
Tails
YES NO Notes
Are Method Blanks < Lab Reporting Limits? (QAP Table 5)
Are Lab Fortified Blanks (LFB) within %Rec range?
Are Lab Control Sample (LCS) %Rec within range? (QAP Table 5)
Are MS & MSD %Rec within range? (QAP Table 5)
Are MS\MSD RPD within range? (QAP Table 5)
Are Blind Field Duplicate RPD's acceptable for all analytes?
Z:\public\Uranium One\Shootaring\Permit licenses etc\Groundwater\2013 Renewal\Revisions\QAP\QA sheets Generic QA 1
SHOOTARING CANYON MILL GROUND WATER MONITORING PROGRAM
QAP BLIND DUPLICATE SAMPLE COMNPARISON CHECKLIST
Sample Collection Date:
Reviewer\Date:
Report Date\Work Order No.:
Primary
Sample
Duplicate
Sample
RM- RM-100
Analyte Units CRL
Primary
Sample
Duplicate
Sample
RPD
(%)
Major Ions Carbonate as CaCO3 mg/L 2
Bicarbonate as CaCO3 mg/L 2
Calcium (Ca) mg/L 1
Chloride (Cl) mg/L 1
Fluoride (F) mg/L 0.1
Magnesium (Mg) mg/L 1
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N mg/L 0.1
Nitrogen, Nitrite + Nitrate as N mg/L 0.1
Potassium (K) mg/L 1
Sodium (Na) mg/L 1
Sulfate (SO4) mg/L 1
Physical Properties TDS mg/L 20
Metals - Dissolved Arsenic (As) mg/L 0.003
Barium (Ba) mg/L 0.1
Cadmium (Cd) mg/L 0.001
Chromium (Cr) mg/L 0.01
Copper (Cu) mg/L 0.01
Lead (Pb) mg/L 0.002
Mercury (Hg) mg/L 0.001
Molybdenum (Mo) mg/L 0.005
Selenium (Se) mg/L 0.005
Silver (Ag) mg/L 0.005
Uranium (U) mg/L 0.0003
Zinc (Zn) mg/L 0.01
Radionuclides - Dissolved Gross Alpha minus Rn & U pCi/L
precision (±) pCi/L
Gross Alpha MDC pCi/L 3 RER
Radium-226 (Ra-226) pCi/L
precision (±) pCi/L
Radium-226 MDC pCi/L 0.2 RER
NA = Not Applicable
ND = Non-Detection at Reporting Limit or MDC
MDC = Lab reported Minimum Detectable Quantity
RER = Replicate Error Ratio = absolute value (original value - dup value)/sqrt[(orig sample error)^2 +(dup error)^2), should be <2
QA sheets Generic Field Dup RPD 1
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

Groundwater Monitoring SAP, Rev. 1
March 2024

ATTACHMENT B
GROUND WATER SAMPLING DATA FORM
GROUND WATER SAMPLING DATA FORM
Sample Identification: Description: Monitor Well
Date Sampled: Samplers:
Depth to water from top of casing (to 0.01 ft):
Sampling Method: Dedicated Pump Flow Rate of Pump:
Time Start: Time Stop: Purge Time:
Volume Purged, gal: Purged water Appearance:

Casing Volume Calculation Water Volume above Pump
Well Depth, ft Pump Depth, ft
Depth to Water, ft Depth to Water, ft
Feet of Water, ft Feet of Water, ft

Well Size - Description Factor,
gal/ft Calc. Feet of Water - Water Casing
Volume, gal1
3 Inch Diam. – Well casing 0.37 x =
5 Inch Diam. – Well casing 1.00 x =
3 Inch Diam. – Above pump 0.37 x =
5 Inch Diam. – Above pump 1.00 x =
Gallons pumped ÷ Casing Vol.1 = Vol. Purged
Ground Water Field Parameters
Time Specific Cond. @25°C µmhos/cm pH Temperature

Function Check on pH/Conductivity/Temperature Meter
Parameter Reading Stand. Soln. Variance Range Approval
pH 7.00 ±0.2
pH 10.00 ±0.2
Conductivity 1413 µS/cm ±10%
Temperature NA
Sample Analytes, Containers, and Chemical Preservatives Verification
Analytes Sample container Preservative Correct Preservative in Correct
Container?
Metals One≥250 ml plastic HNO₃ (nitric acid) Red Label Yes / No
Major Ions One≥250 ml plastic None White label Yes / No
Nutrients One≥250 ml plastic H₂SO₄ (sulfuric acid) Yellow Label Yes / No
Radionuclides One 2 qt. plastic HNO₃ (nitric acid) Red Label Yes / No

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

Groundwater Monitoring SAP, Rev. 1
March 2024

ATTACHMENT C
FIELD INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION FORM
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT0900480

Groundwater Monitoring SAP, Rev. 1
March 2024

FIELD INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION FORM

Date: ___________________ Time: _____________ Sampler: ____________________

pH\CND\Temp Meter Make: __________________ Model\SN: __________________
Water Level Meter Make: __________________ Model\SN: __________________

Reading Standard
Soln.
Std.
Expiration
Variance Range Approval
pH 7.00 ±0.1
pH 10.00 ±0.1
Conductivity 1413 ±10%
Temperature N/A N/A N/A N/A
Water Level Responds [circle one]: (Yes) (No)

Date: ___________________ Time: _____________ Sampler: ____________________

pH\CND\Temp Meter Make: __________________ Model\SN: __________________
Water Level Meter Make: __________________ Model\SN: __________________

Reading Standard
Soln.
Std.
Expiration
Variance Range Approval
pH 7.00 ±0.1
pH 10.00 ±0.1
Conductivity 1413 ±10%
Temperature N/A N/A N/A N/A
Water Level Responds [circle one]: (Yes) (No)

Date: ___________________ Time: _____________ Sampler: ____________________

pH\CND\Temp Meter Make: __________________ Model\SN: __________________
Water Level Meter Make: __________________ Model\SN: __________________

Reading Standard
Soln.
Std.
Expiration
Variance Range Approval
pH 7.00 ±0.1
pH 10.00 ±0.1
Conductivity 1413 ±10%
Temperature N/A N/A N/A N/A
Water Level Responds [circle one]: (Yes) (No)

ANFIELD RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.

RADIOLOGICAL DOSE EVALUATION
FOR
SHOOTARING CANYON URANIUM MILLING FACILITY
MARCH 2024

Prepared by

H3 Environmental, LLC
3810 Osuna Road NE
Albuquerque, NM 87109
and
Wright Environmental Services, Inc.
226 Peterson Street
Fort Collins, CO 80525

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

i | i pages Radiological Dose Evaluation
March 2024

1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 1
2 MILDOS OVERVIEW ....................................................................................................................... 1
3 MILDOS MODELS ............................................................................................................................ 2
3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL MODEL ............................................................................................................. 2
3.1.1 Inputs ..................................................................................................................................... 2
3.1.1.1 Source Terms ..................................................................................................................................................... 3
3.1.1.2 Receptors ........................................................................................................................................................... 3
3.1.1.3 Meteorology ...................................................................................................................................................... 4
3.1.1.4 Food and Water ................................................................................................................................................. 4
3.1.2 Outputs .................................................................................................................................. 4
3.2 ACCIDENT MODELS ....................................................................................................................... 5
3.2.1 Fire or Explosion .................................................................................................................. 5
3.2.1.1 Source Term ...................................................................................................................................................... 5
3.2.1.2 Receptor Parameters .......................................................................................................................................... 5
3.2.1.3 Meteorology ...................................................................................................................................................... 6
3.2.1.4 Output ................................................................................................................................................................ 6
3.2.2 Tornado ................................................................................................................................. 6
3.2.2.1 Source Term ...................................................................................................................................................... 6
3.2.2.2 Receptor Parameters .......................................................................................................................................... 6
3.2.2.3 Meteorology ...................................................................................................................................................... 6
3.2.2.4 Outputs .............................................................................................................................................................. 6
3.2.3 Transportation Accident ........................................................................................................ 7
3.2.3.1 Source Term ...................................................................................................................................................... 7
3.2.3.2 Receptor Parameters .......................................................................................................................................... 7
3.2.3.3 Meteorology ...................................................................................................................................................... 7
3.2.3.4 Outputs .............................................................................................................................................................. 7
4 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................... 7

TABLES

Table 1 Parameters for Radiological Assessment - Environmental MILDOS Model
Table 2 Radiological Dose to Specific Receptors - Environmental MILDOS Model

FIGURE

Figure 1 Potential On Site and Offsite Receptors
Figure 2 Isodose Contours for Source Conditions with Existing Ore Stockpile
Figure 3 Isodose Contours for Source Conditions with Proposed Ore Stockpile
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

1 | 7 pages Radiological Dose Evaluation
March 2024

1 INTRODUCTION
The basis for environmental monitoring programs for radionuclides was developed using the MILDOS-
AREA modeling code (MILDOS).1 MILDOS was designed as a primary licensing and evaluation tool to
provide an accurate analysis of uranium facilities for critical licensing and regulatory decisions. It is used
to perform compliance evaluations and routine radiological impact analyses for various uranium recovery
operations. MILDOS adopts many assumptions in conjunction with input parameters detailed in United
States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) guidance.
This Exhibit details the use of MILDOS for the Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility (Facility) for
the purpose of evaluating potential radiological dose impacts for the 2024 License renewal application
addressing uranium and vanadium milling operations for up to 1,000 tons per day processing capacity.
2 MILDOS OVERVIEW
MILDOS can consider nine environmental pathways: external radiation, inhalation of particulates and
radon; and ingestion of soil, plant foods, meat, milk, aquatic foods, and water.
Models can involve both point sources (stacks, vents) and area sources (ore pads, tailing areas). Particulate
releases considered in the uranium-238 natural decay series are limited to uranium-238, thorium-230,
radium-226, and lead-210; releases of associated decay products assume secular equilibrium with the parent
radionuclide2. Gaseous releases are limited to consideration of radon-222 plus ingrowth of decay products.
The physical mechanisms controlling dispersion of these releases are influenced by wind speed and
direction, particulate sizes, distance, food, and water parameters.
A sector-average Gaussian plume-dispersion model is assumed in the calculation of airborne concentrations
of radioactive materials from fixed-point sources. For area sources, either a virtual-point method or finite-
element integration method is used. The latter method considers a composite of several point sources with
distributed dispersion. For vertical-dispersion, either Briggs dispersion coefficients or Martin-Tickvart
coefficients are used. Briggs dispersion coefficients are appropriate for tall sources such as a uranium mill
stack, while the Martin-Tickvart coefficients are more appropriate for near-ground level sources such as
ore piles and tailings piles (NRC, 2019b).

1 MILDOS-AREA code, version 4.21 developed by Argonne National Laboratory
2 Secular equilibrium occurs when the parent radionuclide has a much longer half-life than its progeny, and a
sufficiently long time has elapsed for in-growth of the progeny such that all members or portions of a decay chain
have approximately the same activity.
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

2 | 7 pages Radiological Dose Evaluation
March 2024

MILDOS offers customization of receptor parameters within this system; individual receptors can be
defined in terms of indoor and outdoor occupancy fractions (hours per year), shielding factors for external
and internal exposures, and specific food and water pathway intake parameters.
The radiation dose to exposed individuals is calculated for planning purposes or for comparison with
regulatory requirements or site-specific action levels. Doses are calculated as total effective dose equivalent
(TEDE) in milliroentgen equivalent man (mrem) to the whole body.
3 MILDOS MODELS
Four MILDOS models were developed to evaluate radiological dose potential from the Facility as described
in the following subsections:
1. An environmental model used to estimate doses to potential public receptors and to generate an
isodose map for planning purposes;
2. Three accident models evaluating potential impacts from a fire or explosion in the yellowcake
drying process, a tornado striking the yellowcake processing area, and a transportation accident
involving a yellowcake shipment.
3.1 Environmental Model
The environmental MILDOS model was designed to represent average conditions for the operating facility
consistent with the 2024 License renewal application, which accounts for 1,000 tons per day processing
capacity with ores having an average annual uranium concentration of 0.25 percent. Parameters were
selected to represent a conservative scenario (i.e., estimating higher radiological doses than anticipated in
reality), and protective factors such as covers on source terms and shielding were not included. The outputs
of this model were used to validate the selection of environmental sampling locations.
MILDOS can interface with the geographic information system tool, ArcGIS Pro3, and the source terms
and receptors in the environmental model were plotted using site-specific coordinates to achieve accurate
spatial and distance information.
3.1.1 Inputs
Table 1 presents MILDOS inputs for the environmental model developed using site-specific information
and guidance and described in the following subsections.

3 ESRI, 2024
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

3 | 7 pages Radiological Dose Evaluation
March 2024

3.1.1.1 Source Terms
Two point source terms (stacks S-1 [Ore Dump Pocket] and S-7 [Yellowcake Centrifuge and Calciner
Product Drumming] identified in Table 3.4-1 of the 2024 License renewal application) and three area source
terms (the current and proposed ore stockpile areas and the proposed tailings storage facility) were modeled
(Table 1).
The operating plan for the Facility as of 2024 includes a transition from use of the existing ore stockpiles
to a new ore stockpile area; this transition was modeled using two different area sources with the existing
configuration in year 1 and the proposed configuration in year 2. No cover material was modeled for either
of the ore stockpiles.
The tailings disposal facility was conservatively modeled in both years as an area source with an
approximately 10-acre area in the center of the proposed final configuration; 10 acres is the maximum dry
tailings area allowed under National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (40 CFR 61, Subpart
W) and represents a worst-case scenario for potential radiological exposure to radon-222. No cover material
was modeled for the tailings disposal facility, and the tailings material was conservatively modeled to be
dry rather than saturated. Parameters retained as MILDOS defaults included tailings mass less than 20
micrometers (3 percent), surface roughness height, particle density, water content, and saltating particle
diameter.
3.1.1.2 Receptors
Four specific potential receptors were modeled in the environmental MILDOS model and are defined in
Table 2. These are (1) office worker, (2) nearest resident, (3) cowboy camp, and (4) nearest Ticaboo
resident (Figure 1; See Section 2.3 of the 2024 License renewal application).
Because public doses from uranium milling are typically dominated by the inhalation pathway, it is possible
to generalize the model for the vicinity of the facility using a grid of hypothetical receptors to show
variability in potential inhalation dose based on location, which is primarily a function of wind speed and
direction. In ArcGIS Pro, a one-quarter mile grid system was created around the mill area extending 2.5
miles to the south, 1.75 miles to the north, and 2.25 miles to the east and west. Receptors were then placed
at each of the grid intersections resulting in approximately 340 individual receptors. Each receptor was
assigned 10 percent outdoor occupancy which represents a generic exposure case of a person spending
approximately one month in the surrounding area, or a conservative recreational use scenario.
The MILDOS model was run with the same source inputs from the known receptor model and doses were
calculated for each receptor. Dose information for year 1 and year 2 was then exported in .csv format,
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

4 | 7 pages Radiological Dose Evaluation
March 2024

imported into ArcGIS Pro, and TEDE information was then joined to each receptor. The Natural Neighbors
interpolation method was then used to build an interpolated plume model for display.
Shielding factors were not included for indoor exposures, meaning that no credit was taken for building
materials or ventilation systems. Radon-222 decay product equilibrium ratios were set to NRC’s
recommended factors of 0.7 for outdoor exposures and 0.5 for indoor exposures (NRC, 2019a). These
equilibrium ratios are assumed to be conservative because most of the radon-222 from the facility will be
“fresh” radon-222 emanated from the area sources without significant ingrowth time.
3.1.1.3 Meteorology
The meteorological data used in the environmental model represent the 1979-1980 measured values (see
Table 2.4-1 of the License renewal application). These data are the most complete measurements of stability
class, wind speed in miles per hour, and the direction of the wind for the facility and represent an annual
average for wind characteristics.
3.1.1.4 Food and Water
Two of the receptors (nearest resident and nearest Ticaboo resident) were modeled to have a potential
exposure to radioactive contamination in food (locally grown produce, meat, and milk). The model assumed
that locally sourced cattle graze on pasture near the facility for 30 percent of the year, and that cattle eat
stored feed during the off-grazing season with less than 1 percent of the stored feed grown locally. Default
values were retained for vegetable, meat, and milk consumption rates and all soil and food transfer factors.
3.1.2 Outputs
Table 2 presents outputs of the MILDOS model for hypothetical receptors located around the facility.
The member of the public likely to receive the highest dose from the licensed operation is a hypothetical
office worker who spends 2000 hours per year working in the administrative building, which is outside of
the current and proposed restricted area but near the current and proposed ore stockpile areas. The modeled
dose to this individual was a maximum TEDE of 84 mrem per year (mrem year-1). This dose was primarily
due to radon-222 emanation from the current long ore pile. Due to the conservatism built into this estimate,
it is unlikely that any member of the public will have the potential to exceed 100 mrem year-1.
In addition to modeling doses to specific potential receptors, MILDOS outputs were paired with spatial
interpolation using ArcGIS Pro to generate potential dose maps around the Facility. Figure 2 and Figure 3
present the results of this modeling as isodose contours. During operations, any individual working within
the restricted area for several days or more will be trained and managed as a radiation worker. Therefore, it
is most appropriate to compare potential doses nearest the sources to occupational radiation dose limits
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

5 | 7 pages Radiological Dose Evaluation
March 2024

(5,000 mrem year-1 TEDE consistent with Utah Administrative Code R313-15-301(1) (a)). Dose estimates
distant from the Facility are well below the public dose limit (less than 5 mrem year-1 TEDE in all occupied
areas).
3.2 Accident Models
Three models were developed to estimate potential radiological impacts from accident scenarios:
1. A fire or explosion in the yellowcake drying process,
2. A tornado striking the yellowcake processing area, and
3. A transportation accident involving a yellowcake shipment.
MILDOS inputs for the accident models were developed using site-specific information and guidance and
described in the following subsections. The results are considered to be represent bounding conditions for
radiological doses in accident scenarios involving both small and large releases of radioactivity.
3.2.1 Fire or Explosion
During the drying process, the water remaining in the yellowcake slurry after the filter wash operation is
removed using a diesel-fuel-fired furnace. The furnace has several large, enclosed cylinders with connecting
fuel piping where an explosion could occur causing the release of yellowcake into the air. The effects of a
fire or explosion are limited by the concentration of heavy material that can be maintained in the air which
is estimated to be approximately 100 milligrams per cubic meter (mg m-3). A room with a volume of
roughly 1000 m3 could therefore release approximately 1000 grams (g) of yellowcake into the air.
3.2.1.1 Source Term
A release of 1240 kilogram (kg) of yellowcake was modeled for the fire/explosion scenario. Because
MILDOS is coded to estimate doses over the course of a year, the source term for the fire scenario was
adjusted to a release rate of 3.4 kg per day (spreading the estimated release of 1240 kg over 365 days.
Further conservative assumptions included that (1) all of the material would be swept out into the
environment when the room is vented, and (2) that 100 percent of the insoluble particles are in the respirable
size range of one micrometer. Associated activity fractions of 0.3 percent thorium-230, 0.2 percent radium-
226, and 0.4 percent of other radionuclides relative to uranium-238 were modeled based on site-specific
estimates.
3.2.1.2 Receptor Parameters
The office worker receptor (Figure 1) was modeled for the fire/explosion scenario. Inhalation and direct
exposure were the only pathways considered, and occupancy was modeled to be 100 percent.
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

6 | 7 pages Radiological Dose Evaluation
March 2024

3.2.1.3 Meteorology
In the fire/explosion analysis, MILDOS wind data were adjusted to blow directly northeast toward the office
receptor and was based on an average of the wind speed and stability class.
3.2.1.4 Output
For the fire/explosion scenario, the effective dose to the office worker receptor was calculated to be 0.3
mrem, well below the allowable public dose for operating conditions of 100 mrem year-1.
3.2.2 Tornado
Although it is impossible to predict the actual characteristics of a tornado, the wind speed approximates
240 miles per hour (mph) in a typical tornado in which approximately 190 mph is rotational and 50 mph is
translational. The mill structures are not designed to withstand a tornado of this intensity. The nature of the
milling operation is such that little could be done to secure the facility even with advance tornado warnings.
3.2.2.1 Source Term
Based on a conservative approach, it was assumed that two days’ production of yellowcake (2,480 kg) is
in the process piping/has not been containerized and 100% of it will become airborne when the tornado
hits. In addition, it was assumed that 48 drums containing 16 metric tons (18 tons) of yellowcake are onsite
when the tornado strikes; and that all of the unpackaged and 15% of the containerized material is released.
Thus, the tornado is assumed to cause about 4,880 kg (2480+16000*0.15) of yellowcake (equivalent to the
contents of 14, 55-gallon drums containing approximately 750 pounds or 340 kg each) to become airborne.
Under the same circumstances of an instantaneous event such as a tornado, the MILDOS yellowcake release
was modeled as 13.37 kg per day (4880/365).
3.2.2.2 Receptor Parameters
The nearest Ticaboo resident (see Figure 1) was modeled for the tornado scenario. Inhalation and direct
exposure were the only pathways considered.
3.2.2.3 Meteorology
In the tornado scenario, the wind was adjusted to blow in a 45-degree cone south toward Ticaboo.
3.2.2.4 Outputs
For the tornado scenario, the nearest Ticaboo resident receptor was calculated to receive a TEDE of 38
mrem.
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

7 | 7 pages Radiological Dose Evaluation
March 2024

3.2.3 Transportation Accident
The refined yellowcake product is placed in 55-gallon drums, classified by the Department of
Transportation as Type A packaging. It is reasonable to assume a small probability of accidents during
shipment with the potential for yellowcake release. The average truck shipment contains approximately 48
drums, or 16,300 kg of yellowcake.
3.2.3.1 Source Term
This scenario assumed a vehicle accident involving 48 drums of yellowcake and an environmental release
fraction of 0.009 (NRC, 1980). All released particles were assumed to be in the respirable size range.
3.2.3.2 Receptor Parameters
This scenario was modeled as a collective effective dose commitment to the nearby general population,
which was modeled with a population density of 7.5 persons per square mile.
3.2.3.3 Meteorology
Wind speed was assumed to be 5 meters per second.
3.2.3.4 Outputs
The 50-year collective dose commitment to the lungs of the nearby general population was calculated to be
0.7 person rems.
4 REFERENCES
NRC. September 1980. Final Generic Environmental Impact Statement on Uranium Milling. NUREG-
0706. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML032751663 (Vol. 1),
ML032751667 (Vol. 2), ML032751669 (Vol. 3)).
---. June 2019a. Evaluations of Uranium Recovery Facility Surveys of Radon and Radon Progeny in Air
and Demonstrations of Compliance with 10 CFR 20.1301. Interim Staff Guidance DUWP-ISG-
01. Uranium Recovery Division of Decommissioning, and Waste Programs, US Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (ADAMS Accession No. ML15051A002).
https://adamswebsearch2.nrc.gov/webSearch2/main.jsp?AccessionNumber=ML15051A002.
---. November 2019b. Technical Manula and User's Guide for MILDOS, Version 4.1. NUREG/CR-7258.
Environmental Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory (US Nuclear Regulatory
Commission).
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

Radiological Dose Evaluation
March 2024

TABLES
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

Radiological Dose Evaluation
March 2024

Table 1. Parameters for Radiological Assessment - Environmental MILDOS Model
Parameter Condition Value Unit Source
Uranium facility operation parameters
Operating time Operating days per year 350 days year-1 Engineering estimate - LRA section 1.3
Plant factor 96 % Calculated by dividing operating days by 365
Ore parameters
Ore quality average,
projected feed
Ore average grade, U308 0.25 % Engineering estimate
Ore radioactivity concentration assumed: U-238, Th-
230, Ra-226, Pb-210 703 pCi g-1 Calculated from % grade using RG 3.64 Table 1
conversion 2812 pCi g-1 per %U308
Ore quality average,
stockpiled feed
Ore average grade, U308 0.13 % Engineering estimate
Ore radioactivity concentration assumed: U-238, Th-
230, Ra-226, Pb-210 366 pCi g-1 Calculated from % grade using RG 3.64 Table 1
conversion 2812 pCi g-1 per %U308
Ore pad dimensions
(existing stockpile)
Ore pad area 14313 m2 MILDOS calculation for georeferenced features
Ore pile height average 2 m Engineering estimate
Rn-222 emanation 703 pCi m-2 s-1 Equal to ore concentration of Ra-226 using RG 3.59
assumption Ore pad dimensions
(proposed)
Ore pad area 8101 m2 MILDOS calculation for georeferenced features
Ore pile height average 2 m Engineering estimate
Rn-222 emanation 366 pCi m-2 s-1 Equal to ore concentration of Ra-226 using RG 3.59
assumption
Stack S-1 (ore dump
pocket) parameters
Stack exit flow rate 2.8 m3 s-1 Converted from LRA Table 3.2-1 6000 cubic feet per
minute 8.56E+07 m3 year-1 Calculated based on operating days per year
Stack diameter 0.46 m Converted from LRA Table 3.2-1 18 inches
Stack height 30 m Converted from LRA Table 3.2-1 100 feet
Stack area 0.16 m2 Calculated
Stack velocity 2 m s-1 Engineering estimate
Stack release rate 0.05 g m-2 Engineering estimate LRA Table 3.2-1
6.58E-03 Ci year-1 Calculated from volume and projected grade
Product parameters

Production rate 1148 kg day-1 Engineering estimate
Fraction released to stack 0.2 % Engineering estimate
Th-230 fraction assumed 0.275 % Engineering estimate
Ra-226 fraction assumed 0.25 % Engineering estimate
Po-210 fraction assumed 0.5 % Engineering estimate
Stack S-7
(yellowcake dryer)
parameters
Stack exit flow rate 1.4 m3 s-1 Converted from LRA Table 3.2-1 3000 cubic feet per
minute 4.23E+07 m3 year-1 Calculated based on operating days per year
Stack diameter 0.46 m Converted from LRA Table 3.2-1 18 inches
Stack height 27 m Converted from LRA Table 3.2-1 90 feet
Stack area 0.16 m2 Calculated
Stack velocity 8.5 m s-1 Calculated by dividing exit flow rate by stack area
Stack release rate 0.02 pound hr-2 Engineering estimate LRA Table 3.2-1
Tailings parameters
Tailings radioactivity
concentration
U-238 concentration assumed (0.02%) 68 pCi g-1 Calculated from 0.02% assumed grade
Tailings radioactivity concentration assumed: Th-230,
Ra-226, Pb-210
703 pCi g-1 Equal to projected feed concentration
Tailings area source
parameters
Active dry tailings area estimate 40532 m2 Limited to 10 acres by NESHAPs standards
Tailings height relative to receptor -30 m Estimated based on change in elevation
Rn-222 emanation 703 pCi m-2 s-1 Equal to tailings concentration of Ra-226 using RG 3.59
assumption Food pathway parameters
Local food pathway
fractions
Cattle grazed locally 30 % Site-specific estimate
Stored feed grown locally < 1 % Site-specific estimate
Note: highlighted values input directly into MILDOS model

< - less than m3 year-1 - cubic meters per year
% - percent NESHAP - National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants µm - micrometers pCi g-1 - picoCuries per gram
Ci g-1 - Curies per gram Pb-210 - lead-210
Ci year-1 - Curies per year Ra-226 - radium-226
days year-1 - days per year Rn-222 - radon-222
g m-2 - gallons per square meter RG - Regulatory Guide
gallons min-1 - gallons per minute Th-230 - throium-230
hours day-1 - hours per day ton day-1 - ton per day
kg year-1 km-2 - kilograms per year per square meter ton truckload-1 - ton per truckload
LRA - license renewal application ton year-1 - ton per year
m - meters truck day-1 - truck per day
m s-1 - meters per second truck week -1 - truck per week
m2 - square meters U-238 - uranium-238
m3 s-1 - cubic meters per second U308 - triuranium octoxide
m3 year-1 - cubic meters per year U-nat - natural uranium

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

Radiological Dose Evaluation
March 2024

Table 2 Radiological Dose to Specific Receptors - Environmental MILDOS Model
Receptor
TEDE Current
Configuration
(mrem yr-1)
TEDE Proposed
Configuration
(mrem yr-1)
Distance
from Facility
(mi)
Maximum
Occupancy
(hr yr-1)
Indoor/Outdoor
Occupancy
Fraction
Predominant
Wind Direction
(blowing from)
Wind Speed
(kts) and
Frequency
Nearest Ticaboo residence 12 12 1.40 6,570 0.50/0.25 West Northwest >21 at 2%
Cowboy Camp 2 3 1.20 4,380 0.00/0.50 Northwest >21 at 1%
Nearest Residence 3 3 2.00 6,570 0.50/0.25 North Northeast >21 at 10%
Office Worker 84 59 0.02 2,000 0.23/0.00 South Southwest >21 at 16%
% - percent mi - miles
> - greater than mrem yr-1 - millirem per year
hr yr-1 - hours per year TEDE - total effective dose equivalent
kts - knots

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

Radiological Dose Evaluation
March 2024

FIGURES
Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

Radiological Dose Evaluation
March 2024

Figure 1 Potential On Site and Offsite Receptors

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

Radiological Dose Evaluation
March 2024

Figure 2 Isodose Contours for Source Conditions with Existing Ore Stockpile

Anfield Resources Holding Corp.
Shootaring Canyon Uranium Milling Facility
Radioactive Materials License UT 0900480

Radiological Dose Evaluation
March 2024

Figure 3 Isodose Contours for Source Conditions with Proposed Ore Stockpile