Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
DRC-2021-020683 - 0901a06880fbe66d
November 29, 2021 ENERGY FUELS Div of INR;z.!e Mr2nagement and Radotion Control NOV s) C 20,21 Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. 225 Union Blvd. Suite 600 Lakewood, CO, US, 80228 303 974 2140 P RC -202 I — OZO683 www.energyfuels.com Sent VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY Mr. Doug Hansen Director Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control Utah Department of Environmental Quality 195 North 1950 West Salt Lake City, UT 84116 Re: Transmittal of Annual Tailings System Wastewater Monitoring Report Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit UGW370004 White Mesa Uranium Mill Dear Mr. Howard: Enclosed are two copies of the White Mesa Uranium Mill Annual Tailings System Wastewater Monitoring Report for 2021 as required by the Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit UGW370004, as well as two CDs each containing a word searchable electronic copy of the report. If you should have any questions regarding this report please contact me. Yours very truly, '1e4 / 444:1?ti ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC. Kathy Weinel Quality Assurance Manager cc: Scott A. Bakken Garrin Palmer Dave Frydenlund Logan Shumway November 29, 2021 Sent VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY Mr. Doug Hansen Director Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control Utah Department of Environmental Quality 195 North 1950 West Salt Lake City, UT 84116 Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. 225 Union Blvd. Suite 600 Lakewood, CO, US, 80228 303 974 2140 www .energyfuels.com Re: Transmittal of Annual Tailings System Wastewater Monitoring Report Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit UGW370004 White Mesa Uranium Mill Dear Mr. Howard: Enclosed are two copies of the White Mesa Uranium Mill Annual Tailings System Wastewater Monitoring Report for 2021 as required by the Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit UGW370004, as well as two CDs each containing a word searchable electronic copy of the report. If you should have any questions regarding this report please contact me. Yours very truly, i(aa;_;Jrr~ ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC. Kathy Weinel Quality Assurance Manager cc: Scott A. Bakken Garrin Palmer Dave Frydenlund Logan Shumway White Mesa Uranium Mill 2021 Annual Tailings System Wastewater Sampling Report State of Utah Groundwater Discharge Permit No. UGW370004 Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. 225 Union Boulevard, Suite 600 Lakewood, CO 80228 November 29, 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 SUMMARY OF MILL TAILINGS SYSTEM ACTIVITIES IN 2021.. .................................. 1 2.1 Cell 1 ..................................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Cell 2 ..................................................................................................................................... 2 2.3 Cell 3 ..................................................................................................................................... 2 2.4 Cell 4A .................................................................................................................................. 2 2.5 Cell 4B .................................................................................................................................. 2 3.0 SAMPLING EVENTS AND SAMPLING METHODOLOGY .............................................. 2 3.1 Sampling Events ................................................................................................................... 2 3.2 Field Data .............................................................................................................................. 3 3.3 Sampling Methodology, Equipment and Decontamination Procedures ............................... 3 3.3.1 Cells ............................................................................................................................... 3 3.3.2 Cell 2 Slimes Drain ........................................................................................................ 3 3.3.3 Cell 4A Leak Detection Systems ................................................................................... 4 3.3.4 Cell 4B Leak Detection Systems ................................................................................... 4 3.3.5 Cells 1, 2, 3, ................................................................................................................... 4 3.4 Field QC Samples ................................................................................................................. 4 3.5 Laboratory Results ................................................................................................................ 4 4.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND DATA EVALUATION ....................................................... 5 4.1 Adherence to Sampling Plan and Permit Requirements ....................................................... 5 4.2 Analyte Completeness Review ............................................................................................. 5 4.3 Data Validation ..................................................................................................................... 5 4.3.1 Field Data QNQC Evaluation ....................................................................................... 6 4.3.2 Holding Time Evaluation ............................................................................................... 6 4.3.3 Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check ........................................................................ 6 4.3.4 Analytical Method Check .............................................................................................. 6 4.3.5 Reporting Limit Evaluation ........................................................................................... 7 4.3.6 Trip Blank Evaluation .................................................................................................... 8 4.3.7 QNQC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates .................................................................... 8 4.3.8 Radiologic Counting Error ............................................................................................. 9 4.3.9 Laboratory Matrix QC Evaluation ............................................................................... 10 1 5.0HISTORICDATA .................................................................................................................. 11 6.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................... 12 6.1 Cell 1 ................................................................................................................................... 12 6.2 Cell 3 ................................................................................................................................... 12 6.3 Cell 4A ................................................................................................................................ 13 6.4 Cell 4B ................................................................................................................................ 13 6.5 Cell 2 Slimes Drain ............................................................................................................. 14 6.6 Cells 3, 4A and 4B Slimes Drain ........................................................................................ 14 6.7 Cells 1, 2, and 3 Leak Detection Systems ........................................................................... 14 6.8 Cell 4A Leak Detection System .......................................................................................... 14 6.9 Cell 4B Leak Detection System .......................................................................................... 15 6.10 Summary and Conclusions of Analytical Results ............................................................. 15 7.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT ....................................................................................... 16 7.1 Assessment of Corrective Actions from Previous Period ................................................... 16 8.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION ................................................................................. 17 11 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Summary of Tailings System Wastewater Monitoring INDEX OF TABS Tab A Tailings and Slimes Drain Field Sheets Tab B Sample Location Figures Tab C Laboratory Analytical Reports Tab D Chemical and Radiological Summary Tables Tab E Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables E-1 Holding Time Evaluation E-2 Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check E-3 Analytical Method Check E-4 Reporting Limit Evaluation E-5 Trip Blank Evaluation E-6 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates E-7 Radiologic Counting Error E-8 Laboratory Matrix QC Evaluation iii 2021 ANNUAL TAILINGS SYSTEM WASTEWATER SAMPLING REPORT 1.0 INTRODUCTION This is the 2021 Annual Tailings System Wastewater Sampling Report for the Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. ("EFRI") White Mesa Mill (the "Mill"), as required under Part I.F.9 of the Mill's State of Utah Groundwater Discharge Permit No. UGW370004 (the "Permit") and Section 6.0 of the Mill's Sampling and Analysis Plan for The Tailings Management System, Leak Detection Systems and Slimes Drains, Revision: 3.0, dated July 8, 2016 (the "Sampling Plan") and approved by the State of Utah Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control ("DWMRC") on August 8, 2016. Cell solution and slimes drain sampling is required under the Sampling Plan and Part I.E.10 of the Permit to be conducted on an annual basis in August of each year for the solutions in Cells 1, 3, 4A, and 4B, the solutions in the slimes drains in Cells 2, 3, 4A, and 4B (for Cells 3, 4A and 4B after the commencement of dewatering), the solutions in the leak detection system ("LDS") in Cell 4A and 4B and any detected solutions in the LDS in Cells 1, 2, and 3 at the time of the August Sampling event. The results of the sampling event are required to be reported to the DWMRC with the Mill's Third Quarter Groundwater Monitoring Report due December 1, of each year. The 2021 sampling event was conducted September 1, 2021 at DWMRC's request to accommodate their schedule. 2.0 SUMMARY OF MILL TAILINGS SYSTEM ACTIVITIES IN 2021 This section provides a brief description of the Mill's tailings management system, and any changes that were made as a result of Mill activities during the reporting year. A description of which systems were sampled is provided in Section 3.0. The Mill is designed not to discharge to groundwater or surface waters. Instead, the Mill tailings system utilizes tailings and evaporation cells for disposal, evaporation, and management of Mill tailings, effluents, and other wastes as indicated below: • Cell 1: dedicated to evaporation of Mill waste solutions; • Cell 2: contains Mill tailings and has been closed to tailings disposal since 1995 and 1 le.(2) byproduct materials since 2000. Cell 2 Phase 1 cover placement commenced in April 2016; • Cell 3: contains Mill tailings and is in the final stages of filling. It also accepts other Mill wastes and 1 le.(2) material from in-situ recovery ("ISR") operations; • Cell 4A: receives Mill tailings and is used for evaporation of Mill solutions; and • Cell 4B: is used for evaporation of Mill solutions. 1 2.1 Cell 1 Cell 1 is a 55-acre impoundment built in June of 1981. It operates as an evaporation pond which receives solutions only. Cell 1 is equipped with a LDS. In 2021, Cell 1 received fluid from the Mill process, storm water run-off, and Mill laboratory waste. The LDS in Cell 1 was dry in 2021. 2.2 Cell 2 Cell 2 is a 67-acre impoundment built in May of 1980. Cell 2 contains Mill tailings and has been closed to tailings disposal since 1995 and lle.(2) byproduct materials since 2000. Cell 2 Phase 1 cover placement commenced in April 2016. Cell 2 is equipped with a LDS and a slimes drain. The LDS was dry in 2021. As part of closure activities, EFRI began monitoring the slimes drain system in 2008. The fluid from the slimes drain is pumped to Cell 4A. Cell 2 no longer receives any solutions or solids. 2.3 Cell 3 Cell 3 is a 71-acre impoundment built in September 1982. Cell 3 is nearly full of solids. This cell is equipped with a LDS and a slimes drain. The LDS was dry in 2021 and the slimes drain system will be monitored once dewatering begins. In 2021, Cell 3 received solid Mill waste, some process solutions, and solid 1 le.2 byproduct material from in situ recovery ("ISR") facilities. 2.4 Cell 4A Cell 4A is a 40-acre impoundment built in 2008. This cell is equipped with a LDS and a slimes drain. The slimes drain system will be monitored once dewatering begins. The LDS in Cell 4A was sampled in 2021, as described below. In 2021, Cell 4A received solutions from the Mill process, and some solid tailings sands. 2.5 Cell 4B Cell 4B is a 40-acre impoundment built in 2011. It operates as an evaporation pond which receives solutions only. No process fluids were sent to Cell 4B from the Mill in 2021.The LOS in Cell 4B was sampled in 2021, as described below. 3.0 SAMPLING EVENTS AND SAMPLING METHODOLOGY 3.1 Sampling Events Samples of solutions from Cells 1, 3, 4A, and 4B, the Cell 2 slimes drain and the Cell 4A and Cell 4B LDSs were collected on September 1, 2021. In accordance with the Permit, DWMRC was notified of the sampling event, and a DWMRC representative was present for a part of the sampling. The DWMRC representative collected split sample aliquots at Cell 2 slimes drain. 2 Maps showing the locations of the solution and slimes drain and, when applicable, LDS sampling locations are attached under Tab B. Table 1, included in the Tables Tab, provides an overview of all solution monitoring samples collected during the current period and includes the sampling date, laboratory report date, and the work order/lab set ID associated with the analytical data. The Permit requires that the samples be analyzed for the water quality parameters listed in Table 2 of the Permit and SVOCs. Additionally, in order to further characterize the radiological constituents and physical properties of the solution, EFRI conducted voluntary analyses on the September 1, 2021 samples for radium- 226, thorium-228, thorium-230, thorium-232, uranium-233/234, uranium-235/236, uranium-238, and specific gravity. The additional data from the September 1, 2021 sampling event are included in separate data tables in Tab D. The gross alpha results have been evaluated and are included as required. These additional data are included in this report for informational purposes only. EFRI may or may not choose to continue these analyses in future sampling events. 3.2 Field Data Attached under Tab A are copies of all of the field data sheets recorded in association with the annual tailings system monitoring program. Sampling dates are listed in Table 1. 3.3 Sampling Methodology, Equipment and Decontamination Procedures As noted in the DWMRC-approved Sampling Plan, Revision 3.0, dated July 8, 2016, field filtering and preservation of metals and gross alpha sample aliquots was not completed due to safety concerns associated with the filtering apparatus and the backpressure created by the increased viscosity of these samples. The gross alpha and metals aliquots were filtered and preserved as necessary by the analytical laboratory. It is important to note that field preservation of the samples is to preclude biological growth and prevent the inorganic analytes from precipitating. Based on past field data, the cell solutions (except Cell 3) and LDS and slimes drain samples are at a low pH at the time of collection without additional preservative. The addition of acidic preservatives in the field would add minimal if any protection from biological growth or precipitation. 3.3.1 Cells Cell solution samples were collected as noted above, at the cell sampling stations shown on the Figures in Tab B, using approved procedures described in the DWMRC-approved Sampling Plan, Section 3.1.2. Disposable or dedicated sampling equipment was used during this sampling event and, as such, rinsate samples were not required. 3.3.2 Cell 2 Slimes Drain Once a tailings cell has started the dewatering procedures, a sample will be collected from the slimes drain system. At this time, Cell 2 is the only slimes drain that requires sampling. The 3 location of the slimes drain for Cell 2 is shown in Tab B. While Cells 3, 4A and 4B are equipped with slimes drain sample locations, Cells 3 and 4A are still active and Cell 4B is being used as an evaporation pond, and the slimes drains will not be pumped (and/or sampled) until dewatering operations have commenced. The Cell 2 slimes drain, shown on the Figures in Tab B, was sampled using a disposable bailer as noted in the DWMRC-approved Sampling Plan, Section 3.1.3. Due to the use of a disposable bailer, a rinsate sample was not required. 3.3.3 Cell 4A Leak Detection Systems The Cell 4A LDS sample was collected from the sampling station shown on the Figures in Tab B using a dedicated stainless steel bucket and ladle as noted in the DWMRC-approved Sampling Plan, Section 3.2.2. 3.3.4 Cell 4B Leak Detection Systems The Cell 4B LDS sample was collected from the sampling station shown on the Figures in Tab B using a dedicated stainless steel bucket and ladle as noted in the DWMRC-approved Sampling Plan, Section 3.2.2. 3.3.5 Cells 1, 2, 3, The Cells 1, 2, and 3 LDSs were not sampled during the 2021 sampling event because the systems were dry. 3.4 Field QC Samples The field Quality Control ("QC") samples generated during this sampling event included one duplicate and one trip blank per shipment to each laboratory which received samples for Volatile Organic Compounds ("VOCs"). The duplicate sample (Cell 65) was submitted blind to the analytical laboratory. As previously stated, no rinsate blanks were collected during this sampling event as only dedicated or disposable equipment was used for sample collection. 3.5 Laboratory Results All analytical results were provided by one of the Mill's two contract analytical laboratories, GEL Laboratories ("GEL") or Energy Laboratories ("EL"). The analytical data as well as the laboratory Quality Assurance ("QA")/QC summanes are included under Tab C. 4 4.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND DATA EVALUATION The Permit requires that the annual tailings system wastewater sampling program be conducted in compliance with the requirements specified in the Mill's approved White Mesa Uranium Mill Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan ("QAP"), the approved Sampling Plan and the Permit itself. To meet these requirements, the data validation completed for the tailings system wastewater sampling program and discussed in this Section utilized the requirements outlined in the QAP, the Permit and the approved Sampling Plan as necessary. The Mill Quality Assurance Manager ("QAM") performed a QA/QC review to confirm compliance of the monitoring program with the requirements of the Permit, the QAP, and the Sampling Plan. As required, data QA includes preparation and analysis of QC samples in the field, review of field procedures, an analyte completeness review, and quality control review of laboratory data methods and data. Identification of field QC samples that were collected and analyzed is provided in Section 3.4 and 4.3.1. Discussion of adherence to the Sampling Plan is provided in Section 4.1. Analytical completeness review results are provided in Section 4.2. The steps and tests applied to check laboratory data QA/QC are discussed in Section 4.3. The analytical laboratories have provided summary reports of the analytical QA/QC measurements necessary to maintain conformance with National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference ("NELAC") certification and reporting protocol. The analytical laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports, including copies of the Chain of Custody forms for each set of Analytical Results, follow the analytical results under Tab C. Results of review of the laboratory QA/QC information are provided under Tab E and discussed in Section 4.3, below. 4.1 Adherence to Sampling Plan and Permit Requirements On a review of adherence by Mill personnel to the QA/QC requirements, the QAM observed that QA/QC requirements established in the Permit, the QAP, and the Sampling Plan were met, as discussed below. 4.2 Analyte Completeness Review All analyses required by the Permit Table 2 were completed. In addition, all cell solution samples were analyzed for SVOCs as required by the Permit. It is important to note that the SVOC analyses include Tentatively Identified Compounds ("TICs"). The SVOC compound 4-chlorophenol would be reported in the TIC data list if detected. 4- chlorophenol was not detected. 4.3 Data Validation The QAP and the Permit identify the data validation steps and data quality control checks required for the tailings system wastewater monitoring program. Consistent with these requirements, the QAM performed the following evaluations: a field data QA/QC evaluation, a receipt temperature check, a holding time check, an analytical method check, a reporting limit check, a trip blank 5 check, a QA/QC evaluation of sample duplicates, a gross alpha counting error evaluation and a review of each laboratory's reported QA/QC information. Each evaluation is discussed in the following sections. Data check tables indicating the results of each test are provided under Tab E. 4.3.1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation The QAM performs a review of all field recorded data to assess adherence with QAP, Permit, and Sampling Plan requirements. The assessment involved review of the Field Data sheets. Review of the Field Data Sheets noted that all requirements for field data collection were met. 4.3.2 Holding Time Evaluation QAP Table 1 identifies the method holding times for each suite of parameters. Sample holding time checks are provided under Tab E. All samples were analyzed within the required holding time. EL reported two results for Total Dissolved Solids ("TDS") for Cell 1, Cell 4B and Cell 65 (duplicate sample of Cell 1). One analysis was completed within holding time and one was completed beyond the holding time. The laboratory noted that there were potential issues with the analyses completed within the holding time due to the sample matrix interferences. The results of both analyses appeared to be comparable and within analytical laboratory error. Comparison of the two TDS results indicates a 2% or less difference between the in holding time sample and the out of holding time sample and therefore the initial results are acceptable for use. It is important to note that pH is analyzed by the laboratory and is not measured in the field because the acidic nature of the samples requires a more robust meter than what is available for field use. In most circumstances pH is measured at the time of sample collection and a holding time is not assessed. If pH is not measured at the time of collection, a 15-minute time limit is set. EL flagged the pH results with an "H" flag because the pH was measured beyond the 15-minute limit. This does not affect the usability of the data, as the sample matrices are stable and pH is collected for informational purposes only and there are no compliance criteria for pH measurements. 4.3.3 Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check Chain of Custody sheets were reviewed to confirm compliance with the Permit. Sample receipt temperature checks are provided under Tab E. All samples were received within the required temperature limit. 4.3.4 Analytical Method Check All analytical methods reported by both laboratories were checked against the required methods specified in Table 1 of the QAP. It is important to note that neither the QAP nor the Permit specify a method for laboratory pH or conductivity. The QAM verified that the laboratory pH and conductivity methods used by the laboratory were appropriate and provided accurate data. 6 Table 1 of the QAP does not specify a method for SVOCs because SVOCs are not routinely collected in the Mill groundwater samples. The GWDP requires that tailings and slimes drain samples shall include the SVOCs identified in EPA Method 8270D. The GWDP does not specify that EPA Method 8270D be used for analysis, only that the compounds specified in that method be included in the analytical list. All of the SVOCs in the GWDP-specified list were included in the analytical data The analytical data are included in Tab C. Analytical method check results are provided in Tab E. 4.3.5 Reporting Limit Evaluation All analytical method reporting limits reported by both laboratories were checked against the reporting limits specified in the Permit. Section I.E.4 of the Permit requires the following Reporting Limits: "all water quality analyses reported shall have a minimum detection limit or reporting limit that is less than or equal to the respective: i. Ground Water Quality Standards ("GWQS") concentrations defined in Table 2 of this Permit, ii. For TDS, Sulfate, and Chloride, the Minimum Detection Limit for those constituents for Cell solution monitoring will be as follows: 1,000 mg/L, 1,000 mg/L, and 1 mg/L, respectively, and iii. Lower limits of quantitation for groundwater for semi-volatile organic compounds listed in Table 2 of EPA Method 8270D, Revision 4, dated February, 2007." Reporting limits are provided in Tab E. There are several constituents that do not have specified reporting limits in either the Permit or EPA Method 8270D. The reporting limits established by the laboratory are reported in the data packages. The reporting limits are comparable to other analytes in the same method based on the same matrix. The reporting limits used by the laboratory are considered acceptable based on the matrix and known difficulties caused by the sample matrix. The VOCs and all of the SVOCs had reporting limits that exceeded the reporting limits listed in the permit or the method respectively. The VOCs that had reporting limits that exceeded the reporting limits are: • Methylene chloride in Cell 1, Cell 2 Slimes, Cell 3, Cell 4A, Cell 4A LDS, Cell 4B, Cell 4B LDS -2021 reporting limit= 25 ug/L All samples had methylene chloride RLs above the permit required RL of 5 ug/L. These exceedances were likely the result of dilutions necessary to address the matrix interferences inherent in these samples. The exceedances do not affect the quality or usability of the data 7 because the results of this sampling provide an "inventory" of cell composition and are not used for comparison to regulatory limits. The reporting limits for the SVOCs exceeded the recommended RLs in Method 8270D. GEL provided both a method detection limit ("DL") and RL. The DL is based on the sample composition and other sample-specific variables such as TDS and pH. Method 8270D provides "recommended" quantitation limits for water samples. The tailings solution matrix is not comparable to routine groundwater samples and require dilutions to address these matrix interferences. The laboratory will report detections to the DL and therefore that is the lowest limit for reporting (i.e. the RL). These RL exceedances were likely the result of dilutions necessary to address the matrix interferences inherent in these samples. The exceedances do not affect the quality or usability of the data because the results of this sampling provide an "inventory" of cell composition and are not used for comparison to regulatory limits. In addition, several sets of sample results had the reporting limit raised for at least one analyte due to sample dilution. In all cases the reported value for the analyte was higher than the increased detection limit. In the case of Cell 1/Cell 65, thallium and lead results, EL reported results at too high a dilution, therefore EFRI requested EL reanalyze those two analytes at a lower dilution. Thallium was also reanalyzed for Cell 3, Cell 4A, Cell 4A LDS, and Cell 4B LDS. 4.3.6 Trip Blank Evaluation All trip blank results were reviewed to identify any blank contamination. Trip blank evaluations are provided in Tab E. All trip blank results associated with the samples were less than the reporting limit for the VOCs. 4.3. 7 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates Section 9.1.4 a) of the QAP states that the relative percent difference (the "RPD") will be calculated for the comparison of duplicate and original field samples. The QAP acceptance limits for RPDs between the duplicate and original field sample is less than or equal to 20% unless the measured results are less than 5 times the required detection limit. This standard is based on the EPA Contract Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review, February 1994, 9240.1-05-01 as cited in the QAP. The RPDs are calculated for all duplicate pairs for all analytes regardless of whether or not the reported concentrations are greater than 5 times the required detection limits; however, data will be considered noncompliant only when the results are greater than 5 times the required detection limit and the RPD is greater than 20%. RPDs are also only calculated when both the sample and the duplicate report a detection for any given analyte. If only one of the pair reports a detection the RPD cannot be calculated. The additional duplicate information is provided for information purposes. All duplicate results were within 20% RPD except for pH, arsenic, beryllium, cobalt, copper, manganese, molybdenum, selenium, uranium, and vanadium in the duplicate pair Cell 1/Cell 65. The pH results were greater than 20% RPD, however, the sample and duplicate results were not greater than 5 times the RL and as such are acceptable. Per the approved QAP, and in response to requests from DWMRC, a separate corrective action for duplicate RPDs outside of acceptance 8 limits has been developed. The revised procedure for duplicate results outside of acceptance limits was implemented. The corrective actions that were taken in accordance with the revised procedure are as follows: the QAM contacted the Analytical Laboratory and requested a review of the raw data to assure that there were no transcription errors and the data were accurately reported. The laboratory noted that the data were accurate and reported correctly. Reanalysis was not completed as the RPDs above the limit are likely due to interferences caused by the matrix, as discussed below. There is no effect on the usability of the data due to the duplicate results exceeding the comparability criteria because the matrix of the sample solution caused the noncompliance. Results of the RPD test are provided under Tab E. The radiologic duplicates are discussed in Section 4.3.8 below. 4.3.8 Radiologic Counting Error Section 9.14 of the QAP requires that all gross alpha analysis reported with an activity equal to or greater than the Groundwater Compliance Limit (the "GWCL") (for the tailings system wastewater samples the GWQS will be used), shall have a counting variance that is equal to or less than 20% of the reported activity concentration. An error term may be greater than 20% of the reported activity concentration when the sum of the activity concentration and error term is less than or equal to the GWQS. Results of routine radiologic sample QC are provided under Tab E. All tailings system wastewater radiologic sample results, except for Cell 3, met the counting error requirement. The error term in Cell 3 was greater than 20% caused by matrix interference due to the nature of the tailings solution. Section 9.1.4 of the QAP also requires a comparability check between the sample and field duplicate sample results utilizing the formula provided below: The original and duplicate sample did not meet the duplicate comparability check specified in the QAP for gross alpha. Results of the RPD test are provided under Tab E. Per the approved QAP, and in response to requests from DWMRC, a separate corrective action for duplicate RPDs outside of acceptance limits has been developed and is documented in the revised QAP. The revised procedure for duplicate results outside of acceptance limits was implemented for the gross alpha results in duplicate pair Cell 1/Cell 65. The corrective actions that were taken in accordance with the revised procedure are as follows: the QA Manager contacted the Analytical Laboratory and requested a review of the raw data to assure that there were no transcription errors and the data were accurately reported. The laboratory noted that the data were accurate and reported correctly. Reanalysis was not completed as the RPDs above the limit are likely due to interferences caused by the matrix as discussed below. The lack of comparability of the gross alpha results is indicative of a matrix interference and does not affect the usability of the data. Matrix interference is most likely caused by high concentrations of TDS and other constituents in the sample. 9 4.3.9 Laboratory Matrix QC Evaluation Section 9.2 of the QAP requires that the laboratory's QA/QC Manager check the following items in developing data reports: (1) sample preparation information is correct and complete, (2) analysis information is correct and complete, (3) appropriate analytical laboratory procedures are followed, (4) analytical results are correct and complete, (5) QC samples are within established control limits, (6) blanks are within QC limits, (7) special sample preparation and analytical requirements have been met, and (8) documentation is complete. In addition to other laboratory checks described above, EFRI's QAM rechecks QC samples and blanks (items (5) and (6)) to confirm that the percent recovery for spikes and the relative percent difference for spike duplicates are within the method-specific required limits, or that the case narrative sufficiently explains any deviation from these limits. Results of this quantitative check are provided under Tab E. All lab QA/QC results from both EL and GEL met these requirements. There were QC results which did not meet laboratory established acceptance limits, as identified in Tab E and described below. A significant number of the tailings system wastewater samples had the RL raised for multiple analytes due to matrix interference and/or sample dilution. RL evaluations are discussed in Section 4.3.5. The check samples included at least the following: a method blank, a laboratory control spike ("LCS"), a matrix spike ("MS") and a matrix spike duplicate ("MSD"), or the equivalent, where applicable. All qualifiers, and the corresponding explanations reported in the QA/QC Summary Reports for any of the check samples for any of the analytical methods were reviewed by the QAM. The QAP Section 8.1.2 requires that a MS/MSD pair be analyzed with each analytical batch, depending upon the analytical method requirements and/or method limitations. The QAP does not specify acceptance limits for the MS/MSD pair, and the QAP does not specify that the MS/MSD pair be prepared on EFRI samples only. Acceptance limits for MS/MSDs are set by the laboratories. The review of the information provided by the laboratories in the data packages verified that the QAP requirement to analyze a MS/MSD pair with each analytical batch was met. While the QAP does not require it, the recoveries were reviewed for compliance with the laboratory established acceptance limits. The QAP does not require this level of review, and the results of this review are provided for information only. The information from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports indicates that the MS/MSDs recoveries and the associated RPDs for the samples were within acceptable laboratory limits except as indicated in Tab E. The data recoveries and RPDs which are outside the laboratory established acceptance limits do not affect the quality or usability of the data because the recoveries and RPDs above or below the acceptance limits are indicative of matrix interference most likely caused by other constituents in the samples. Matrix interferences are applicable to the individual sample results only. The requirement in the QAP to analyze a MS/MSD pair with each analytical batch was met and as such the data are compliant with the QAP. 10 The QAP specifies that surrogate compounds shall be employed for all organic analyses, but the QAP does not specify acceptance limits for surrogate recoveries. The analytical data associated with the routine quarterly sampling met the requirement specified in the QAP. The information from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports indicates that the surrogate recoveries for the samples were within acceptable laboratory limits for the surrogate compounds. The requirement in the QAP to analyze surrogate compounds was met and the data are compliant with the QAP. Furthermore, there are no QAP requirements for surrogate recoveries. The information from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports indicates that the LCS/LCSD recoveries for the samples were within acceptable laboratory limits for all LCS/LCSD compounds except as noted in Tab E. The compounds noted with LCS/LCSD recoveries outside of acceptance limits are noted for low recovery and the surrogate recoveries associated with the LCS/LCSD indicate that the analytical system was operating within acceptable limits and the data are acceptable as reported and there is no effect on the usability of the data. The QAP, Section 8.1.2 requires that each analytical batch shall be accompanied by a method blank. The analytical batches routinely contain a blank, which is a blank sample made and carried through all analytical steps. For the Mill samples, a method blank was prepared for the analytical methods. Per the approved QAP, contamination detected in analysis of method blanks will be used to evaluate any analytical laboratory contamination of environmental samples. The QAP states that non-conformance conditions will exist when contaminant levels in the samples(s) are not an order of magnitude greater than the blank result. Molybdenum, tin, uranium, and copper were reported the method blank from EL. The QAP criteria were not met for tin in the Cell 2 slimes, Cell 4A LDS, and Cell 3 samples because the method blank detections were not less than an order of magnitude of the sample results. The method blank detection indicates false positive results or high biased for tin in the samples, however, since the Cell 2 slimes, Cell 4A LDS, and Cell 3 were all nondetect there is no effect on the sample results. No specific corrective actions are specified in the QAP. The QAP requirement to analyze a method blank with each batch and evaluate the results has been completed as required. Method blank results are included in Tab E. The EL data packages noted low recoveries in the initial calibration verification ("ICV") samples for manganese, cobalt and thallium. Low recoveries in the ICV sample could indicate a low bias to the sample results. The low ICV recoveries do not affect the quality or usability of the data because the results of this sampling provide an "inventory" of cell composition and are not used for comparison to regulatory limits. 5.0 HISTORIC DATA The historic analytical data for the tailings system wastewater sampling program are included in Tab D. In addition, the average concentrations for Cell 3, compiled in the DWMRC GWDP, Statement of Basis for a Uranium Mining Facility at White Mesa, South of Blanding, Utah, dated December 1, 2004 are included in Tab D. 11 6.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 6.1 Cell 1 Cell 1 solutions were acidic in nature with a laboratory pH of 0.4. As expected, the solutions contained gross alpha, major ions, metals, and VOCs. SVOCs, except pyridine, were not detected. Regarding major ions, chloride, fluoride, magnesium, ammonia, potassium, sodium and sulfate were one or more orders of magnitude greater in concentration than the other major ions. Metals exhibiting the greatest concentration by at least one order of magnitude higher than the other metals analyzed included arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, lead, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, selenium, silver, thallium, tin, uranium, vanadium and zinc. A decrease was noted in the gross alpha concentration in the September 2021 sample. The variable gross alpha results are being caused by matrix interference due to the nature of the tailings solution and are not representative of gross alpha from radium concentrations in the solution. This is evidenced by the results of the voluntary additional analyses. The results of the voluntary analyses are shown in Tab D. The majority of the concentrations reported in the 2021 sample remained within historic ranges. Nitrate, pH mercury, fluoride, sodium, sulfate, TDS, arsenic, beryllium, lead, manganese, selenium, thallium and vanadium had reported concentration outside of the historic ranges. Both increases and decreases were noted. The concentrations which fall outside of the historic ranges are due to effects from the severe local drought, routine sampling and analytical error, and matrix interferences during the analyses caused by the inherent composition of the fluids. It is important to note that not all constituents present in the tailings fluids will exhibit the same behavior as a result of concentration of the tailings fluids and any increases or decreases in constituent results will not be linear. The individual constituent results are greatly affected by the matrix of the tailings fluids and each constituent will behave differently based on the matrix interactions and the differing solubility properties of the constituent. Comparison of Cell 1 fluids to those of Cells 4A, and 4B reveals that Cell 1 1s similar in concentration ratios to the fluids in Cells 4A and 4B. 6.2 Cell 3 Cell 3 solutions were basic in nature, with a laboratory pH of 10. As expected, the solutions contained major ions, metals, and VOCs (acetone only). SVOCs were not detected. Regarding major ions, carbonate and bicarbonate, chloride, ammonia, sodium and sulfate were generally one or more orders of magnitude greater in concentration than the other major ions. Metals exhibiting the greatest concentration by at least one order of magnitude greater than the other metals analyzed included arsenic, copper, iron, molybdenum, selenium, uranium, vanadium and zinc. A decrease in the gross alpha and many metals and ions concentrations was noted in the September 2021 sample while an increase was noted in pH, carbonate, bicarbonate and molybdenum. The reason for the changes in many constituent concentrations was due to nature of the process solutions that flowed into Cell 3. 12 The analyte concentrations reported in the 2021 sample decreased overall relative to the 2019 results. The changes in concentrations are likely due to the pH change noted in 2021. The pH change is the result of the process solutions that were added in 2021. It is important to note that not all constituents present in the tailings fluids will exhibit the same behavior as a result of concentration of the tailings fluids and any increases or decreases in constituent results will not be linear. The individual constituent results are greatly affected by the matrix of the tailings fluids and each constituent will behave differently based on the matrix interactions and the differing solubility properties of the constituent. 6.3 Cell 4A Cell 4A solutions were acidic in nature, with a laboratory pH of 2.2. As expected, the solutions contained gross alpha, major ions, metals. VOCs and SVOCs were not detected. Cell 4A fluid exhibited the highest major ion concentrations for chloride, fluoride, magnesium, ammonia, potassium, sodium and sulfate. The metals arsenic, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, lead, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, selenium, uranium, vanadium and zinc were one or more orders of magnitude greater than the other metals analyzed. An increase in the gross alpha concentration of the 2021 sample was noted. The variable gross alpha results are being caused by matrix interference due to the nature of the tailings solution and are not representative of gross alpha from radium concentrations in the solution. This is evidenced by the results of the voluntary additional analyses which are shown in Tab D. Overall, the concentrations reported in the 2021 sample remained approximately the same as the 2020 sample. Chloride, fluoride nitrate, sodium, and TDS reported concentration slightly above the historic ranges. Concentration changes noted are within the analytical accuracy of the methods used for analysis. It is important to note that not all constituents present in the tailings fluids will exhibit the same behavior as a result of concentration of the tailings fluids and the increases in constituent results will not be linear. The individual constituent results are greatly affected by the matrix of the tailings fluids and each constituent will behave differently based on the matrix interactions and the differing solubility properties of the constituent. Comparison of Cell 4A fluids to those of Cells 1 and 4B reveals that Cell 4A is similar in concentration ratios to the fluids in Cells 1 and 4B. 6.4 Cell 4B Cell 4B solutions were acidic in nature, with a laboratory pH of 1.2. As expected, the solutions contained gross alpha, major ions, metals, and VOCs. SVOCs, except pyridine were not detected. Cell 4B fluid exhibited the highest major ion concentrations for chloride, fluoride, magnesium, ammonia, potassium, sodium and sulfate. The metals arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, lead, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, selenium, thallium, uranium, vanadium and zinc were one or more orders of magnitude greater than the other metals analyzed. An increase in the gross alpha concentration of the 2021 sample was noted. The variable gross alpha results are being caused by matrix interference due to the nature of the tailings solution and are not representative of gross alpha from radium concentrations in the solution. This is evidenced by the results of the voluntary additional analyses which are shown in Tab D. 13 The concentrations reported in the 2021 sample are above previous results due to the cell liquid pool shrinking due to reprocessing and severe drought conditions which concentrated the constituents. It is important to note that not all constituents present in the tailings fluids will exhibit the same behavior as a result of concentration of the tailings fluids and the increases in constituent results will not be linear. The individual constituent results are greatly affected by the matrix of the tailings fluids and each constituent will behave differently based on the matrix interactions and the differing solubility properties of the constituent. Comparison of Cell 4B fluids to those of Cells 1 and 4A reveals that Cell 4B is similar in concentration ratios to the fluids in Cells 1 and 4A. 6.5 Cell 2 Slimes Drain Cell 2 Slimes drain fluid was acidic in nature, with a laboratory pH of 3.0. As expected, the solutions contained gross alpha, major ions, metals, and VOCs. Two SVOCs were detected. Major ions that were highest in concentration by one or more orders of magnitude included chloride, magnesium, ammonia, sodium and sulfate. For metals, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, thallium, uranium, vanadium and zinc were at least one order of magnitude greater in concentration than other metals analyzed. The 2021 gross alpha concentration remained similar to the 2020 sample result. The gross alpha result remains in the same order of magnitude of the historic data. It is important to note that gross alpha results affected by matrix interference due to the nature of the tailings solution and are not representative of gross alpha from radium concentrations in the solution. This is evidenced by the results of the voluntary additional analyses which are shown in Tab D. The concentrations reported in the 2021 sample remained within historic ranges. Concentration changes noted are within the analytical accuracy of the methods used for analysis. 6.6 Cells 3, 4A and 4B Slimes Drain In accordance with the Permit, the slimes drains for Cell 3, 4A and 4B are not required to be sampled until dewatering operations have begun. Cell 1 was designed to be used solely as an evaporation pond and does not have a slimes drain. 6.7 Cells 1, 2, and 3 Leak Detection Systems Consistent with the Permit, the Cells 1, 2, and 3 LDSs were not sampled during the 2021 sampling event. The Cells 1, 2, and 3 LDSs were dry. 6.8 Cell 4A Leak Detection System Cell 4A LDS solutions were acidic in nature, with a laboratory pH of 2.4. As expected, the solutions contained gross alpha, major ions, metals and VOCs. No SVOCs were detected. Cell 4A LDS fluid exhibited the highest major ion concentrations for chloride, fluoride, magnesium, ammonia, sodium, and sulfate. The metals arsenic, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, lead, 14 manganese, molybdenum, nickel, selenium, uranium, vanadium, and zinc were one or more orders of magnitude greater than the other metals analyzed. A slight increase in the gross alpha concentration, compared to the 2020 sample was noted. The variable gross alpha results are being caused by matrix interference due to the nature of the tailings solution and are not representative of gross alpha from radium concentrations in the solution. This is evidenced by the results of the voluntary additional analyses which are shown in Tab D. The majority of the concentrations reported in the 2021 sample remained within historic ranges. Fluoride, cobalt, acetone and methyl ethyl ketone had reported concentration above the historic ranges. The concentrations which fall outside of the historic ranges are due to effects from the severe local drought, routine sampling and analytical error, and matrix interferences during the analyses caused by the inherent composition of the fluids. 6.9 Cell 4B Leak Detection System Cell 4B LDS solutions were acidic in nature, with a laboratory pH of 2.0. As expected, the solutions contained gross alpha, major ions, and metals. No VOCs were detected. Two SVOCs was detected. Cell 4B LDS fluid exhibited the highest major ion concentrations for chloride, fluoride, magnesium, ammonia, potassium, sodium, and sulfate. The metals arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, lead, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, selenium, uranium, vanadium and zinc were one or more orders of magnitude greater than the other metals analyzed. An increase in the gross alpha concentration was noted in the 2021 sample. The variable gross alpha results are being caused by matrix interference due to the nature of the tailings solution and are not representative of gross alpha from radium concentrations in the solution. This is evidenced by the results of the voluntary additional analyses which are shown in Tab D. The majority of the concentrations reported in the 2021 sample remained within historic ranges. Fluoride, nitrate, cobalt, lead, molybdenum and uranium had reported concentration outside of the historic ranges. Both increases and decreases were noted. The concentrations which fall outside of the historic ranges are due to changes in the Cell 4B solutions caused by effects from the severe local drought, routine sampling and analytical error, and matrix interferences during the analyses caused by the inherent composition of the fluids. 6.10 Summary and Conclusions of Analytical Results The metals arsenic, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, selenium, uranium, vanadium and zinc were generally present in greatest concentration for all samples. For major ions, chloride, fluoride, magnesium, ammonia, sodium, and sulfate were predominant. Both increases and decreases were noted for several metals and major anions. Concentrations are variable and are driven by Mill operations. EFRI conducted additional voluntary analyses (not required by the GWDP) in order to further characterize the radiological and physical properties of the tailings solution, as discussed Section 3.1 above. The results of the additional voluntary analyses for radium-226, thorium-228, thorium-230, thorium-232, uranium- 233/234, uranium-235/236, uranium-238, and specific gravity show that the variability in gross alpha results are being caused by matrix interference due to the nature of the tailings solution and are not representative of gross alpha from radium concentrations in the solution. EFRI may or may 15 not choose to continue these additional analyses in the future. The changes in concentrations of metals and major ions are reflective of Mill operations and are driven by the addition/movement of fluids during periods of operation. The individual constituent results are greatly affected by the matrix of the tailings fluids and each constituent will behave differently based on the matrix interactions and the differing solubility properties of the constituent. Overall, the results of the 2021 tailings solutions are within historic, expected ranges except as noted above. 7.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT No corrective action reports are required for the 2021 annual sampling event. 7.1 Assessment of Corrective Actions from Previous Period No corrective action reports were required for the 2020 annual sampling event and as such there is no assessment of previous actions necessary. 16 8.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION This document was prepared by Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. By: Scott A. Bakken Vice President, Regulatory Affairs 17 Certification: I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. Scott A. Bakken Vice President, Regulatory Affairs Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. 18 TABLES Table 1 Summary of Tailings System Wastewater Monitoring Location Sample Date Cell 1 Solutions 9/1/2021 Cell 2 Slimes Drain 9/1/2021 Cell 3 Solutions 9/1/2021 Cell 4A Solutions 9/1/2021 Cell4ALDS 9/1/2021 Cell 4B Solutions 9/1/2021 Cell 4B LDS 9/1/2021 Cell 65 -Duplicate of 9/1/2021 Cell 1 Notes: GEL = GEL Laboratories, LLC EL = Energy Labs Date of Laboratory Report Work Order Number/Lab Set ID GEL-10/4/2021, 11/1/2021 GEL-554861 EL -10/15/2021, 10/29/2021, 11/11/2021 EL-C21090172 GEL-10/4/2021, 11/1/2021 GEL-554861 EL -10/15/2021, 10/29/2021, 11/11/2021 EL-C21090172 GEL-10/4/2021, 11/1/2021 GEL-554861 EL -10/15/2021, 10/29/2021, 11/11/2021 EL -C21090172 GEL-10/4/2021, 11/1/2021 GEL-554861 EL -10/15/2021, 10/29/2021, 11/11/2021 EL -C21090172 GEL-10/4/2021, 11/1/2021 GEL-554861 EL -10/15/2021, 10/29/2021, 11/11/2021 EL-C21090172 GEL-10/4/2021, 11/1/2021 GEL-554861 EL -10/15/2021, 10/29/2021, 11/11/2021 EL-C21090172 GEL-10/4/2021, 11/1/2021 GEL-554861 EL -10/15/2021, 10/29/2021, 11/11/2021 EL-C21090172 GEL-10/4/2021, 11/1/2021 GEL-554861 EL -10/15/2021, 10/29/2021, 11/11/2021 EL-C21090172 *EFRI conducted the annual sampling event in September 2021. EFRI collected additional samples aliquots for specific gravity and additional radiological constituents. I INDEX OF TABS Tab A Tailings System Monitoring Field Sheets Tab B Sample Location Figures Tab C Laboratory Analytical Reports Tab D Chemical and Radiological Summary Tables Tab E Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables E-1 Holding Time Evaluation E-2 Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check E-3 Analytical Method Check E-4 Reporting Limit Evaluation E-5 Trip Blank Evaluation E-6 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates E-7 Radiologic Counting Error E-8 Laboratory Matrix QC Evaluation Tab A Tailings System Monitoring Field Sheets Field Data Record-Tailings Solutions, LDS and Slimes Drain Sampling Location: ..,.C.-c...,_1.:....1 -..LI _____ Sampling Personnel: ,;.no«: l:JoH;~, C.-en L~,,_. ... ,.. Is this a Slimes Drain? □ Yes 1' No If this is a Slimes Drain, measure depth to wastewater immediately before sampling, DTW immediately before sampling (slimes only):~~-'tl~~~--------- Weather Conditions at Time of Sampli~g:__,.c..=l ..... o ... w\......,'3,.... +-• ~E....,,.6--:=o~~~-r-------- AnalyticaJ Parameters/Sample Collection Method: Metals ~ Yes □ No □ Yes 111 No o □ ~ .J:"c,:ql.f Nutrients Iii Yes □ No □ Yes Iii No □ □ Iii , ~e~ ~ Other Non BJ Yes-' □ No □ Yes ~ No o o [j Radiologies t.-,u·~. Gross Alpha !Iii Yes □ No □ Yes ll No D □ lV,l C,.EL. SVOCs Si Yes o No o Yes l'll No o □ !f.l &EL Conductivity ffiJ Yes □ No □ Yes Ii No D □ ~ enUO..'-' QC Samples Associated with this Location: □ Rinsate Blank 17i Duplicate Duplicate Sample Narne:~G~•-11~'-.5~------- Notes: Ar ... ~\led-00 s.,~ ~+ 0 800 . Se:epk~ 4>11eJt:J. "'=} 0&; 10 . ~; .... ; ,;a "-\-+:,..,(, 0~ C.olle.d:,'cto LefJ· ~:te ,J· oga.,5 Field Data Record-Tailings Solutions, LDS and Slimes Drain Sampling Location: ~ 1; 1!'.JC.S -# 2-,. Is this a Slimes Drain? Sampling Personnel: ---r.:fl11t!r J.l.11.JJ • Dect1 L~""'"Yl IJl Yes □ No If this is a Slimes Drain, measure depth to wastewater immediately before sampling. DTW immediately before sampling (slimes only):_....,3. __ 4-"-. ..-5 .... K~------- Weather Conditions at Time of Sampling:--=G::;..Jl .... o""'u ..... d=~r+l-.,_;R,...a.'"'"'; a....,;"'-'~"1--------- Analytical Parameters/Sample Collection Method: _J voes Metals Nutrients Other Non Radiologies ~ Yes □ No D Yes ~No ~ Yes □ No D Yes ~ Yes D No D Yes IJI No ~Yes □No □Yes ~No D 111 D D l'1 D D D □ 1'$1 D Gross Alpha ~ Yes □ No o Yes D D &EL SVOCs ~ Yes □ No D Yes D J;p D Conductivity ig Yes D No D Yes D D QC Samples Associated with this Location: D Rinsate Blank D Duplicate Duplicate Sample Name: ___________ _ Notes: A, .... ~\JC~ OQ !);tc "'-+ og~7 5>\;,,,c.s a.~<>,;t\. L¢-t\: s:tG cd: o~s;i, . S°"""p'e.l. l..>«G ~: \el {;I),... ~c.. P '-"? M ltC ~ p1•"+-.S "-nplc:J. ~ li..-,~~ .# ~ ..._, Field Data Record-Tailings Solutions, LDS and Slimes Drain Sampling Location: _c ... c. ..... 11'---=3=-------Sampling Personnel: :fe.ancc Hou:½ , Deeo L~...---" Is this a Slimes Drain? □ Yes ~ No If this is a Slimes Drain, measure depth to wastewater immediately before sampling~ DTW immediately before sampling (slimes only):~M ..... il~jQ~--------- Weather Conditions at Time of Sampli~g:~C..~l-0-~___,'3,..... t-l _.R~o.-:~o~;~oj,,_ _______ _ Analytical Parameters/Sample Collection Method: voes 5Yes □No □Yes rt No Metals ~Yes □No □Yes !II No Nutrients !i!Yes □No □Yes al No Other Non lilYes-· □No D Yes ~No Radiolo2ics Gross Alpha ~ Yes □No □Yes Ill No SVOCs Bl Yes □No □Yes lil!No Conductivity 1'1Yes □No □Yes IS No QC Samples Associated with this Location: □ Rinsate Blank D Duplicate D D D D D D D D D D □ D o D Duplicate Sample Name: ___________ _ Notes: A ... r;\JeJ. oo s)h: 9':+ ogs, s."r!f>l~ c.ou~d~~ ,-.t 0«10$ L«~ s,'fc ~+ 010, ~ 6-EL r, J:I\CI'"_(\~ iii ~e'"°'"\ ~ ~t:"~- !VJ CrEL. ~ f.,.E.L ft] Ene~'-' "'.J ( Field Data Record-Tailings Solutions, LOS and Slimes Drain Sampling Location: ..-G~c.=1_,_l _':\__..A,___,___ _____ Sampling Personnel: ,:;..noec HoU;J~, D-ea L~..,..,"' Is this a Slimes Drain? □ Yes fil No If this is a Slimes Drain, measure depth to wastewater immediately before sampling~ DTW immediately before sampling (slimes only):_,f'-l=tJ='A'-------------- Weather Conditions at Time of Sampling:~c..~1~0....,w\..,....=~~-T~ _R~6'~· n~;{)~--,1~-------- Analytical Parameters/Sample Collection Method: Metals ~ Yes o No o Yes [JI No D D ~ rt\c-:_C\'-4 Nutrients El!Yes □No □ Yes SI No D D " Other Non , □No □Yes ~No ljl Yes· □ □ ~ Radioloj?;ics Gross Alpha ll!I Yes □No □ Yes !:! No D □ ~ (.,-EL. SVOCs 131 Yes □No □ Yes $No □ D ~ Conductivity "'Yes □No □Yes IE No □ D fl] QC Samples Associated with this Location: □ Rinsate Blank □ Duplicate Duplicate Sample Name: Notes· . o s.;+~ a-.+ 0'115. So.-p l~_,. coll~c.fea ~.t O'l:tO. Le~ A: Field Data Record-Tailings Solutions, LDS and Slimes Drain Sampling Location: C.c:,11 YA LOS Sampling Personnel: -r;..nnc:c l:loU;~, Deea L~"" .. " Is this a Slimes Drain? D Yes ijl No If this is a Slimes Drain, measure depth to wastewater immediately before sampling~ DTW immediately before sampling (slimes only):.-#.6 ..... ~~--------- Weather Conditions at Time of Sampling:____..G-~J ... 0...,iJ-....=6~-.... ,-R.~°"-; .,_;_"',1t---------- Analytical Parameters/Sample Collection Method: VOCs Iii Yes D No D Yes ~ No D D El,l 6-El Metals ~ Yes D No D Yes IE No D D ~ Nutrients Iii Yes o No □ Yes SI No □ □ Iii Other Non !SJ Yes-o No o Yes ~ No D o ijl Radiologies Gross Alpha lli!Yes □No □Yes ~No □ D l!f.l CrEL.. SVOCs BJ Yes D No D Yes ISl!No D D Pp Conductivity !!;I Yes D No D Yes IE No ci □ ~ "..J QC Samples Associated with this Location: □ Rinsate Blank □ Duplicate Duplicate Sample Name:. ___________ _ Notes: A,.r;\Jeli on si+e e-,+ OC\!11 . ~.,,.,..ple~ c.olltc.~-'~ a--t O'\,$ , Le{::}-.sif, o.t 09 Y1 Field Data Record-Tailings Solutions, LDS and Slimes Drain Sampling Location: ..,..c .... c. .... l..,_I _L.f-=..o..BL-----Sampling Personnel: -rMOCC Hou;~ ' Deen L~M&.I\ Is this a Slimes Drain? o Yes ~ No If this is a Slimes Drain, measure depth to wastewater immediately before sampling~ DTW immediately before sampling (slimes only):....ea=------------ Weather Conditions at Time of Sampling:__,.c..C.Jl ..... 0""w\_6..,.. +1....aR""'"=-·-· ,. __ ;fl.__~--------- Analytical Parameters/Sample Collection Method: voes Metals Nutrients Other Non Radiologies t,i Yes □No ~Yes □No SI Yes □No [ii Yes:·• □ No □Yes ~No □Yes [II No □Yes SI No □ Yes Gross Alpha ~ Yes o No □ Yes [ll No SVOCs fil Yes o No o Yes !Sil No Conductivity ~ Yes o No □ Yes IE No QC Samples Associated with this Location: □ Rinsate Blank o Duplicate D D □ □ D D D D □ D D D D □ Duplicate Sample Name:. ___________ _ Ell f,.E L r, f=t1C":._C\~ ~ .~~"~-1. -Iii ~t:<~. If.I 6-EL. ~ (.,.EL fl) En~ro.'--\ "..J Field Data Record-Tailings Solutions, LDS and Slimes Drain Sampling Location: Ced I LIB LD..S Sampling Personnel: ,:;.nncr Hou;~, Dua L~"""'" Is this a Slimes Drain? □ Yes ijl No If this is a Slimes Drain, measure depth to wastewater immediately before sampling1 DTW immediately before sampling (slimes only):__.M~'tl""':4'----------- Weather Conditions at Time of Sampling:__.,C.c.l ..... o-o.d""'-"'1'3..-· +l _,t'--... _; .,,_,_, nj-r-------- Analytical Parameters/Sample Collection Method: Metals $ Yes □ No □ Yes Ill No □ D ~ f'nc,:q'-f Nutrients EJ! Yes o No o Yes 91 No o □ i, ~c~~ Other Non Bl Yes-. D No D Yes ~ No D D Ii! Radiologies e-it<~. Gross Alpha IQ Yes o No o Yes CJ No □ □ ~ C,-EL SVOCs 1!1 Yes o No o Yes 1511 No o D rfJ &El- Conductivity !Iii Yes o No o Yes IE No □ □ ll.1 EncrQ.~ "..J QC Samples Associated with this Location: □ Rinsate Blank □ Duplicate Duplicate Sample Name:. ___________ _ Notes: A,.r;\Jed. oo c)tc ~+ 0.,.50 l ~~mp\~~ c..ol 1 e.c.+,A o...t Q't S.S. L& . ~~I--IOO Field Data Record-Tailings Solutions, LDS and Slimes Drain Sampling Location: ..,..,...._l.,_l _.,.,,'25,,,,,.__ ____ Sampling Personnel: :::r;.nncc Holl;J~, Deen L~f'lla.t\ Is this a Slimes Drain? □ Yes J¥l No If this is a Slimes Drain, measure depth to wastewater immediately before sampling, DTW immediately before sampling (slimes only): ....... M=t'l'""~'---------- W eather Conditions at Time of Sampling:,__,.kCJl,....o-w\.......,,,--t,.,.,. ,r---=-R..=1-"..;.al"_,.,'ti,.__ _______ _ o V . Analytical Parameters/Sample Collection Method: voes Iii Yes □No □Yes !:!No □ □ SI 6-El Metals ~ Yes □No □Yes Iii No Nutrients ijl Yes □No □Yes SJ No Other Non l!I Yes -· oNo □Yes ~No Radiologies Gross Alpha llilYes □No □Yes IJ No SVOCs Bl Yes □No □Yes ISIINO Conductivity l'J;IYes □No □ Yes IE No QC Samples Associated with this Location: o Rinsate Blank ~ Duplicate □ □ □ □ □ D □ □ □ □ □ □ Duplicate Sample Name:,__..C.""'e.""'"l.._l ....,t,._5.,__ ______ _ ~ l'1 Iii l!Jl ff.I &EL ~ Notes: A.-r;'1e,). oo s.;k °'=+ 08'.06, S...rp)A Colled'J. ~ o«IO-t..ct+ site:.,....). 0~65, Dao Het\4e!'5on d Ph.I &oblc on $;+, +o obserQC s-.mpli5 ~\1c.nf. "...J TabB Sample Location Figures V MW-02 • 32 MW-03 • CELL 1 LEAK DETECTION SAMPLE LOCATION MW-17 • MW-27 ♦ CELL 2 33 PIEZ•2 • PIEZ-3 • M -26 TW4•1cflTW4-0 o OTW4-3 OIW4-12 OTW4•1lbTW4•11 OTW4-13 1W4•.,.·8 OTW4•1 OTW4"'brw4-14 OTW4-6 PIEZ-4 • PIEZ•S • W, Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. White Mesa MIii : utah T37S, R22E Annual Tailings System Sllmes and Leak Detection Sample Locadons ..!! ii! " • c,, l. I ii, i.: 1! 0 A. ~ di i!! a :I C ~ • s r a :I g C -i!! 1 :i tC .. I I ... ! f j / Iii MW-02 • 32 MW-03 • CELL 1 -,. -,.- MW-17 • MW-27 ♦ CELL 2 33 PIEZ-2 • PIEZ-3 • 1W4-20 OTW4-5 ·26 TW4•1 rfJTW4•9 O OTW4-3 OfW4-12 OTW4•1fbTW4-11 01W4-13 PIEZ-5 • TW4-~-8 OTW4-1 OTW4-40fW4-14 OTW'1•G W, Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. on 10/11/1 11/2♦/1 White Mesa MDI San Juan : utah on: TJ75, R22E Annual Talllngs System, Cell Solution Sample Locations : 11 24 15 TabC Laboratory Analytical Reports EN:RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 866.686.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 11/11/21 Report Date: 10/15/21 Collection Date: 09/01/21 08:10 DateReceived: 09/03/21 Matrix: Aqueous Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Project: Annual Tailings 2021 Lab 10: C21090172-001 Client Sample ID: Cell 1 MCL/ Analyses Result Units Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date / By MAJOR IONS Carbonate as CO3 ND mg/L 5 A2320 B 09/07/21 13:45 / kjp Bicarbonate as HCO3 ND mg/L 5 A2320 B 09/07/21 13:45 / kjp Chloride 74700 mg/L D 100 E300.0 09/08/21 17:53 / dmb Fluoride 14900 mg/L D 200 A4500-F C 09/14/21 13:52 / dmb Sulfate 351000 mg/L D 400 E300.0 09/08/21 17:53 / dmb Calcium 234 mg/L D 30 E200.7 09/21/21 05:12 I jcg Magnesium 19800 mg/L E200.7 09/16/21 12:34 / jcg Potassium 4030 mg/L D 200 E200.7 09/21/21 05:00 I jcg Sodium 91900 mg/L D 500 E200.7 09/21/21 05:00 I jcg PHYSICAL PROPERTIES Conductivity @ 25 C 76000 umhos/cm E 5 A2510 B 09/07/21 13: 11 / kjp pH 0.4 s.u. H 0.1 A4500-H B 09/07/2113:11 / kjp pH Measurement Temp 16.3 oc A4500-H B 09/07/21 13: 11 / kjp Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 584000 mg/L DE 1000 A2540 C 09/07/21 13:52 / kjp Solids, Total Dissolved TDS@ 180 C 576000 mg/L DH 5000 A2540 C 09/08/21 15:59 / kjp -E -TDS residue exceeded the 200 mg limit per method. The sample was re-analyzed with a lower volume to obtain a valid result. The E qualifed data is reported at client request. -H -Original analysis was done within hold time. Data is from recheck analysis. NUTRIENTS Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N Nitrogen, Ammonia as N METALS, DISSOLVED Arsenic Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Manganese Mercury Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Tin Uranium Vanadium Zinc Report Definitions: RL -Analyte Reporting Limit QCL -Quality Control Limit 27 mg/L 5850 mg/L 1040000 ug/L 3660 ug/L 21300 ug/L 29600 ug/L 59500 ug/L 3760000 ug/L 6680000 ug/L 91200 ug/L 1630000 ug/L 0.035 mg/L 418000 ug/L 18400 ug/L 21800 ug/L 2640 ug/L 1680 ug/L 1820 ug/L 655000 ug/L 4410000 ug/L 905000 ug/L D -Reporting Limit (RL) increased due to sample matrix H -Analysis performed past the method holding time D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D E353.2 09/13/21 14:46 / nts 200 E350.1 09/11/21 13:04 / dmb 600 E200.7 09/16/21 12:34 / jcg 20 E200.7 09/22/21 02:21 / jcg 600 E200.7 09/16/21 12:34 / jcg 600 E200.7 09/16/21 12:34 / jcg 600 E200.7 09/22/21 02:21 I jcg 20000 E200.7 09/21/21 05:00 I jcg 60000 E200.7 09/21/21 05:00 I jcg 20 E200.8 11/05/21 14:56 / srm 1000 E200.7 09/21/21 05:00 I jcg 0.001 E245.1 09/17/21 18:48 / etad 20000 E200.7 09/21/21 05:00 I jcg 600 E200.7 09/22/21 02:21 I jcg 600 E200.7 09/16/21 12:34 / jcg 4 E200.8 09/26/21 07: 14 / jcg 20 E200.8 11/05/21 14:56 / srm 50 E200.8 09/26/21 07:14 I jcg 20 E200.8 11/05/21 14:56 / srm 20000 E200.7 09/21/21 05:00 I jcg 600 E200.7 09/16/21 12:34 / jcg MCL -Maximum Contaminant Level ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) E -Estimated value -result exceeds the instrument upper quantitation limit Page 4 of 56 Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com BIiiings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 868.888.7175 • Helene, MT 877.472.0711 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 11/11/21 Report Date: 10/15/21 Collection Date: 09/01/21 08:10 DateReceived: 09/03/21 Matrix: Aqueous Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Project: Annual Tailings 2021 Lab ID: C21090172-001 Client Sample ID: Cell 1 Analyses DATA QUALITY Solids, Total Dissolved -Calculated A/C Balance Anions Cations Report Definitions: RL -Analyte Reporting Limit QCL -Quality Control Limit Result Units 557000 mg/L -4.79 % 10200 meq/L 9260 meq/L MCL/ Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date / By 1.00 A1030 E 09/21/21 19:15 / tlf A1030 E 09/21/21 19:15 / tlf A1030 E 09/21/21 19:15 / tlf A1030 E 09/21/21 19: 15 / tlf MCL -Maximum Contaminant Level ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) Page 5 of 56 Company: Address: GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Report Date: November 1, 2021 Contact: Project: Tailings Characterization ---------------- Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector: Cell I 554861001 Water 0l-SEP-21 08:10 03-SEP-21 Client Proiect: DNMIO0 107 Client ID: DNMIO0 l ------ 'ammeter ualifier Result DL nits PF OF Anal Date Time Batch Meth(!!!_ volatile Organics ;wB46 8260 Volatiles "As Received" 2-Butanone u Acetone Benzene u Carbon tetrachloride u Chloroform Chloromethane u Methylene chloride u Naphthalene u Tetrahydrofuran u Toluene u Xylenes (total) u Surrogatellracer recovery Bromofluorobenzene Toluene-d8 l ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 ND 152 ND ND 46.2 ND ND ND ND ND ND Result 243 ug/L 265 ug/L 313 ug/L Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) CAS No. No Tentatively Identified Compounds Found 8.34 25.0 ug/L 5 8.72 25.0 ug/L 5 1.67 5.00 ug/L 5 1.67 5.00 ug/L 5 1.67 5.00 ug/L 5 1.67 5.00 ug/L 5 2.50 25.0 ug/L 5 1.67 5.00 ug/L 5 8.34 25.0 ug/L 5 1.67 5.00 ug/L 5 5.00 15.0 ug/L 5 Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits 50.0 97 (72%-125%) 50.0 106 (75%-123%) 50.0 125 (73%-129%) RT Esl Concentration Fit Qual The following Analytical Methods were pe_rt_or_m_e_d ____ --~-------------- Method Description Analyst Comments SW846 8260D JEB 09/09/21 1310 2171666 Date Time: 09109/21 13 10 Date Time: 09/09/2113 JO SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. Notes: Column headers are defined as follows: OF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 20 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Le/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Address : 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: September 24, 2021 Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel Project: Tailings Characterization ----- Client Sample ID: Cell l Proiect: DNMI00107 Sample ID: 554861001 Client ID: DNMIOOJ Matrix: Water Collect Date: OI-SEP-21 08:10 Receive Date: 03-SEP-21 Collector: Client •aramcter ualifier Result DL RL nits PF DF Analyytl)ate Time Batch Method ,em i-Volatile-GC/MS ,W846 3510C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) "As Received" 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene u ND 37.5 125 ug/L 0.0125 NMI 09/09/21 1939 2171562 1,2-Dichlorobenzene u ND 37.5 125 ug/L 0.0125 I ,2-Diphenylhydrazine u ND 37.5 125 ug/L 0.0125 1,3-Dichlorobenzene u ND 37.5 125 ug/L 0.0125 I, 4-D ichlorobenzene u ND 37.5 125 ug/L 0.0125 1-Methylnaphthalene u ND 3.75 12.5 ug/L 0.0125 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol u ND 37.5 125 ug/L 0.0125 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol u ND 37.5 125 ug/L 0.0125 2,4-Dichlorophenol u ND 37.5 125 ug/L 0.0125 2,4-Dimethylphenol u ND 37.5 125 ug/L 0.0125 2,4-Dinitrophenol u ND 62.5 250 ug/L 0.0125 2,4-Dinitrotoluene u ND 37.5 125 ug/L 0.0125 2,6-Dinitrotoluene u ND 37.5 125 ug/L 0.0125 2-Chloronaphthalene u ND 5.13 12.5 ug/L 0.0125 2-Chlorophenol u ND 37.5 125 ug/L 0.0125 2-Methyl-4,6-u ND 37.5 125 ug/L 0.0125 dinitrophenol 2-Methy )naphthalene u ND 3.75 12.5 ug/L 0.0125 2-Nitrophenol u ND 37.5 125 ug/L 0.0125 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine u ND 41.3 125 ug/L 0.0125 4-u ND 37.5 125 ug/L 0.0125 Bromophenylphenylethe r 4-Chloro-3-u ND 37.5 125 ug/L 0.0125 methylphenol 4-u ND 37.5 125 ug/L 0.0125 Chlorophenylphenylethe r 4-Nitrophenol u ND 37.5 125 ug/L 0.0125 Acenaphthene u ND 3.75 12.5 ug/L 0.0125 Acenaphthylene u ND 3.75 12.5 ug/L 0.0125 Anthracene u ND 3.75 12.5 ug/L 0.0125 Benzi dine u ND 48.8 125 ug/L 0.0125 Benzo( a )anthracene u ND 3.75 12.5 ug/L 0.0125 Benzo( a )pyrene u ND 3.75 12.5 ug/L 0.0125 Benzo(b )fluoranthene u ND 3.75 12.5 ug/L 0.0125 Page 39 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Address : 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: September 24, 2021 Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel Project: Tailings Characterization Client Sample ID: Cell l Proiect: DNMI00107 Sample ID: 554861001 Client ID: DNMIO0I ---------- >arameter ____ Qualifier Re ult DL RL Units PF _ DF Analvst____lliit..L_Iime Batch Method ;emi-Volatile-GC/MS ,W846 35J0C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) "As Received" Benzo(ghi)perylene u ND 3.75 12.5 ug/L 0.0125 Benzo(k)fluoranthene u ND 3.75 12.5 ug/L 0.0125 Buty lbenzylphthalate u ND 3.75 125 ug/L 0.0125 Chrysene u ND 3.75 12.5 ug/L 0.0125 Di-n-butylphthalate u ND 3.75 125 ug/L 0.0125 Di-n-octylphthalate u ND 3.75 125 ug/L 0.0125 Di benzo( a,h )anthracene u ND 3.75 12.5 ug/L 0.0125 Diethy lphthalate u ND 3.75 125 ug/L 0.0125 Dimethylphthalate u ND 3.75 125 ug/L 0.0125 Diphenylamine u ND 37.5 125 ug/L 0.0125 Fluoranthene u ND 3.75 12.5 ug/L 0.0125 Fluorene u ND 3.75 12.5 ug/L 0.0125 Hexachlorobenzene u ND 37.5 125 ug/L 0.0125 Hexachlorobutadiene u ND 37.5 125 ug/L 0.0125 Hexachlorocyclopentadi u ND 37.5 125 ug/L 0.0125 ene Hexachloroethane u ND 37.5 125 ug/L 0.0125 Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene u ND 3.75 12.5 ug/L 0.0125 Isophorone u ND 43.8 125 ug/L 0.0125 N-Methyl-N-u ND 37.5 125 ug/L 0.0125 nitrosomethy ]amine N-u ND 37.5 125 ug/L 0.0125 Nitrosodipropylamine Naphthalene u ND 3.75 12.5 ug/L 0.0125 Nitro benzene u ND 37.5 125 ug/L 0.0125 Pentachlorophenol u ND 37.5 125 ug/L 0.0125 Phenanthrene u ND 3.75 12.5 ug/L 0.0125 Phenol u ND 37.5 125 ug/L 0.0125 Pyrene u ND 3.75 12.5 ug/L 0.0125 Pyridine 146 37.5 125 ug/L 0.0125 bis(2-Chloro-I-u ND 37.5 125 ug/L 0.0125 methylethyl)ether bis(2-u ND 37.5 125 ug/L 0.0125 Chloroethoxy )methane bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether u ND 37.5 125 ug/L 0.0125 bis(2-u ND 3.75 12.5 ug/L 0.0125 Ethy lhexy I )phthalate m,p-Cresols u ND 46.3 125 ug/L 0.0125 o-Cresol u ND 37.5 125 ug/L 0.0125 Page 40 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Address : 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Report Date: September 24, 2021 Contact: Project: Tailings Characterization Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Cell 1 Proiect: DNMIO0 107 554861001 Client ID: DNMIO0I ~aramcter ___ Qualifier R~e~u=l~t _____ D~ ___ ___Rk _nit _ PF _ DF Analy_g_ Date Time Batch Method ;emi-Volatile-GC/MS ,W846 3510C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) "As Received" Surrogate/Tracer recovery Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits p-Terphenyl-d 14 266 ug/L 625 43 (24%-129%) Nitrobenzene-d5 381 ug/L 625 61 (39%-112%) 2-Fluorobiphenyl 404 ug/L 625 65 (39%-112%) Phenol-d5 481 ug/L 1250 38 (15%-85%) 2-Fluorophenol 508 ug/L 1250 41 (11%-79%) 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 936 ug/L 1250 75 (37%-132%) Tentatively /<lentified Compound (TIC) CASNo. RT Est. Concentration Fit Qua/ No Tentatively Identified Compounds Found The following Pre Methods were performed ________ _ Method Description Analyst Date Time SW846 3510C SW8463510C 3510C BNA Liq. Prep-8270 Analysis 3510C BNA Liq. Prep-8270 Analysis ----LWl SG2 The followin Analytical Methods w_er_e~e_rfi_o_r_m_ed ___________ _ 09/22/21 09/08/21 Method Description Analyst Comments 1120 1228 Date Time: Date Time: Prep Batch 2176674 2171561 09/09/2119 39 09/09121 19 39 -------------SW846 351 0C/8270D SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. Notes: Column headers are defined as follows: Df: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 41 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Le/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Company: Address: Contact: Project: Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector: GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Tailings Characterization Cell I 554861001 Water 0 l-SEP-21 08: JO 03-SEP-21 Client Project: Client ID: Report Date: October 4, 2021 DNMI00107 DNMIO0l ----Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC RL Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method High Rad Testing Alphaspec Th, Liquid "As Received" Thorium-228 469 +/-66.1 84.4 Thorium-230 l.74E+05 +/-1200 79.4 Thorium-232 1060 +/-93.8 33.7 GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received" Gross Radium Alpha 24600 +/-255 20.9 Lucas Cell, Ra226, liquid "As Received" Radium-226 424 +/-29.8 19.6 U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 "As Received" Uranium-233/234 2.18E+05 +/-4910 1020 Uranium-235/236 11800 +/-1280 653 Uranium-238 2.2JE+05 +/-4940 773 The following Prep Methods were performed: Method Description G -RAD-A-026 Laboratory Composi~ The following Analytical Methods were performed: ----Method Descri tion I DOE EML HASL-300, Th-OJ-RC Modified 2 EPA 903.0 3 EPA 903.1 Modified 4 DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified Surrogate/Tracer Reco_v_e_ry~_T_es_t ___________ _ Thorium-229 Tracer Barium Carrier Uranium-232 Tracer Notes: Alphaspec Th, Liquid "As Received" GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received" U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 "As Received" 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Analyst Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (I-sigma). -- pCi/L TCl 09/25/21 1004 2177500 pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L TC! 09/28/21 0931 2177508 2 pCi/L LXPI 10/03/21 0722 2177509 3 pCi/L TC! 09/28/21 0926 2178805 4 pCi/L pCi/L ----Date Time Prep Batch 2171222 Anal st Comments Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits ---__,, ___ __, ____ _ 91.7 (15%-125%) 99.8 (25%-125%) 69 (15%-125%) SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. Page 97 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Report Date: October 4, 2021 Company: Address: Contact: Project: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Tailings Characterization --------Client Sample ID: Ce 111 Sample ID: 554861001 Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC RL Column headers are defined as follows: DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 98 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Le/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Project: Client ID: DNMI00107 DNMIO0l Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Company: Address: Contact: Project: Certificate of Analysis Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Tailings Characterization Report Date: September 24, 2021 ---------------Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector: Cell l 554861001 Water 0l-SEP-21 08:10 03-SEP-21 Client -------- Parameter Qualifier Result DL Hazardous Waste ASTM D 5057 Specific Gravity "As Received" Specific Gravity 1.38 0.0100 The following Analytical Methods were performed: RL 0.100 Project: Client ID: DNMI00107 DNMIO0l Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method ---- none I VHI 09/14/21 0853 2173276 Method _ __ ""D-'e..C..sc=r"""i =ti=·o=n _________________ _ ASTMD 5057 Analyst Comments"----------- Notes: SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. Column headers are defined as follows: DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 80 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Le/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit EN:RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.ener!Jylab.com Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 866.686.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 11/11/21 Report Date: 10/15/21 Collection Date: 09/01/21 08:35 DateReceived: 09/03/21 Matrix: Aqueous Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Project: Annual Tailings 2021 Lab ID: C21090172-002 Client Sample ID: Slimes #2 MCL/ Analyses Result Units Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date / By MAJOR IONS Carbonate as CO3 ND mg/L 5 A2320 B 09/07/21 13:49 / kjp Bicarbonate as HCO3 ND mg/L 5 A2320 B 09/07/21 13:49 / kjp Chloride 4200 mg/L D 50 E300.0 09/08/21 18:12 / dmb Fluoride 130 mg/L D 50 A4500-F C 09/14/21 10:35 / dmb Sulfate 68500 mg/L D 200 E300.0 09/08/21 18:12 / dmb Calcium 463 mg/L D 30 E200.7 09/21/21 05:17 / jcg Magnesium 3950 mg/L E200.7 09/16/21 12:51 / jcg Potassium 661 mg/L D 20 E200.7 09/21/21 05:17 / jcg Sodium 4520 mg/L D 50 E200.7 09/21/21 05:17 / jcg PHYSICAL PROPERTIES Conductivity @ 25 C 53200 umhos/cm E 5 A2510 B 09/07/21 13:19 / kjp pH 3.0 s.u. H 0.1 A4500-H B 09/07/21 13: 19 / kjp pH Measurement Temp 24 .3 oc A4500-H B 09/07/21 13:19 / kjp Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 95700 mg/L D 1000 A2540 C 09/07/21 13:53 / kjp NUTRIENTS Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 48.0 mg/L D 0.2 E353.2 09/13/21 14:47 / nts Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 2950 mg/L D 100 E350.1 09/11 /21 11 :35 / dmb METALS, DISSOLVED Arsenic 19300 ug/L D 10 E200.8 09/26/21 07:29 I jcg Beryllium 217 ug/L D 20 E200.7 09/22/21 02:25 I jcg Cadmium 5890 ug/L D 10 E200.8 09/26/21 07:29 I jcg Chromium 1810 ug/L D 10 E200.8 09/26/21 07:29 I jcg Cobalt 42700 ug/L D 2000 E200.7 09/21/21 05: 17 / jcg Copper 139000 ug/L D 2000 E200.7 09/21/21 05:17 / jcg Iron 2840000 ug/L D 6000 E200.7 09/21/21 05: 17 / jcg Lead 562 ug/L D 10 E200.8 09/26/21 07:29 / jcg Manganese 138000 ug/L D 100 E200.7 09/21/21 05:17 / jcg Mercury ND mg/L 0.0002 E245.1 09/17/21 18:52 / etad Molybdenum 3090 ug/L D 10 E200.8 09/26/21 07:29 I jcg Nickel 119000 ug/L D 2000 E200.7 09/21/21 05:17 I jcg Selenium 657 ug/L D 20 E200.8 09/26/21 07:29 I jcg Silver 5 ug/L D 4 E200.8 09/26/21 07:29 I jcg Thallium 1580 ug/L D 1000 E200.8 09/28/21 09:17 / srm Tin ND ug/L 50 E200.8 09/26/21 07:29 I jcg Uranium 24300 ug/L D 10 E200.8 09/26/21 07:29 I jcg Vanadium 450000 ug/L D 2000 E200.7 09/21/21 05:17 I jcg Zinc 674000 ug/L D 600 E200.7 09/22/21 02:25 I jcg DATA QUALITY Solids, Total Dissolved -Calculated 82600 mg/L 1.00 A1030 E 09/21/21 19:15 / !If A/C Balance 0.49 % A1030 E 09/21/21 19:15 / tlf Report RL -Analyte Reporting Limit MCL -Maximum Contaminant Level Definitions: QCL -Quality Control Limit ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) D -Reporting Limit (RL) increased due to sample matrix E -Estimated value -result exceeds the instrument upper quantitation limit H -Analysis performed past the method holding time Page 6 of 56 EN:RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 888.686.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 11/11/21 Report Date: 10/15/21 Collection Date: 09/01/21 08:35 DateReceived: 09/03/21 Matrix: Aqueous Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Project: Annual Tailings 2021 Lab ID: C21090172-002 Client Sample ID: Slimes #2 Analyses DATA QUALITY Anions Cations Report Definitions: RL -Analyte Reporting Limit QCL -Quality Control Limit Result Units 1550 meq/L 1570 meq/L MCL/ Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date / By A1030 E 09/21/2119:15 /tlf A1030 E 09/21/2119:15/tlf MCL -Maximum Contaminant Level ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) Page 7 of 56 GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Address : 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Contact: Project: Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Tailings Characterization Report Date: November 1, 2021 -------- Client Sample ID: Slimes #2 554861002 Water 0l-SEP-21 08:35 03-SEP-21 Client Proiect: DNMI00107 Sample ID: Client ID: DNMIO0 l Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector: •aramete_r ____ _ volatile Organics ,W846 8260 Volatiles "As Received" 2-Butanone Acetone Benzene u Carbon tetrachloride u Chloroform Chloromethane u Methylene chloride u Naphthalene Tetrahydrofuran u Toluene u Xylenes (total) u Surrogate/Tracer recovery Bromofluorobenzene Toluene-d8 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 Result 89.9 522 ND ND 15.9 ND ND 7.15 ND ND ND Result 239 ug/L 265 ug/L 283 ug/L Te11tatively Identified Compound (TIC) CAS No. Hexanal, 2-ethyl-000123-05-7 ___ RL __ __!Lnits PF 8.34 25.0 ug/L 8.72 25.0 ug/L 1.67 5.00 ug/L 1.67 5.00 ug/L 1.67 5.00 ug/L 1.67 5.00 ug/L 2.50 25.0 ug/L 1.67 5.00 ug/L 8.34 25.0 ug/L 1.67 5.00 ug/L 5.00 15.0 ug/L Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits 50.0 95 (72%-125%) 50.0 106 (75%-123%) 50.0 113 (73%-129%) RT Est. Concentration Fit 14.252 56 ug/L 91 The followin Analytical Methods were erform_ed ___________ _ OF Anal st Date Time Batch Mctho_!! 5 JEB 09/08/21 1733 2171666 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Date Time: 09/08/21 17 33 Qua/ Date Time: 09/08/2117 33 NJ Method Description Analyst Comments SW846 8260D SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. Notes: Column headers are defined as follows: DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 21 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Le/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Address : 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Contact: Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Project: Tailings Characterization Client Sample ID: Slimes #2 Sample ID: 554861002 Matrix: Water Collect Date: OI-SEP-21 08:35 Receive Date: 03-SEP-21 Collector: Client ---- •arameter Qualificr __ JtcsuJt DL RL __ ,emi-Volatile-GC/MS ,W846 35J0C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) "As Received" 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 1,2-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine u ND 30.0 100 1,3-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 1,4-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 1-Methylnaphthalene 11.6 3.00 10.0 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 2,4-Dichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 2,4-Dimethylphenol u ND 30.0 100 2,4-Dinitrophenol u ND 50.0 200 2,4-Dinitrotoluene u ND 30.0 JOO 2,6-Dinitrotoluene u ND 30.0 100 2-Chloronaphthalene u ND 4.10 10.0 2-Chlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 2-Methyl-4,6-u ND 30.0 100 dinitrophenol 2-Methylnaphthalene 10.4 3.00 10.0 2-Nitrophenol u ND 30.0 100 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine u ND 33.0 100 4-u ND 30.0 100 Bromophenylphenylethe r 4-Chloro-3-u ND 30.0 100 methylphenol 4-u ND 30.0 100 Chlorophenylphenylethe r 4-Nitrophenol u ND 30.0 100 Acenaphthene u ND 3.00 10.0 Acenaphthylene u ND 3.00 10.0 Anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 Benzi dine u ND 39.0 100 Benzo( a )anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 Benzo( a )pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 Benzo(b )fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 Page 42 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Report Date: September 24, 2021 Proiect: DNMI00107 Client ID: DNMIOOl ---- nits PF OF Anal• t J a~ Time Batch Method ug/L 0.0100 NMI 09/09/21 2007 2171562 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Address: 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: September 24, 2021 Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel Project: Tailings Characterization Client Sample ID: Slimes #2 Proiect: DNMI00107 ~ample ID:_ 554861002 Client ID: DNMIOOI ----- 'aramek!:__ ualifier Result DL RL Uni~--DF _A!!al st Date Time Batch Method ,emi-Volatile-GC/MS iW846 35J0C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) "As Received" Benzo(ghi)perylene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Benzo(k)fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Butylbenzylphthalate u ND 3.00 JOO ug/L 0.0100 Chrysene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Di-n-butylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 Di-n-octylphthalate u ND 3.00 JOO ug/L 0.0100 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Diethy lphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 Dimethylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 Diphenylamine u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Fluorene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Hexachlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Hexachlorobutadiene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Hexachlorocyclopentadi u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 ene Hexachloroethane u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Indeno(l ,2,3-cd)pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Isophorone u ND 35.0 JOO ug/L 0.0100 N-Methyl-N-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 nitrosomethylamine N-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Nitrosodipropylamine Naphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 l Nitrobenzene u ND 30.0 JOO ug/L 0.0100 l Pentachlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 l Phenanthrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 l Phenol u ND 30.0 JOO ug/L 0.0100 l Pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 1 Pyridine u ND 30.0 JOO ug/L 0.0100 l bis(2-Chloro-l-u ND 30.0 JOO ug/L 0.0100 1 methylethyl)ether bis(2-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Chloroethoxy )methane bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 bis(2-u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Ethylhexyl)phthalate m,p-Cresols u ND 37.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 o-Cresol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Page 43 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Address : 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Report Date: September 24, 2021 Contact: Project: Tailings Characterization Client Sample ID: Sample ID_:_ _ Slimes #2 554861002 Project: DNMIO0 I 07 Client ID: DNMIO0I ua lifl&.L_ Res=u=lt ____ --=D"-'L=------=R=L=----=nii_PF __ -=DF Analy t Date Time Batch Method ,emi-Volatile-GC/MS ,W846 3510C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) "As Received" Surrogatellracer recovery Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits Date Time: 09/09/21 20 07 p-Terphenyl-d14 224 ug/L 500 45 (24%-129%) Phenol-d5 281 ug/L 1000 28 (15%-85%) Nitrobenzene-d5 308 ug/L 500 62 (39%-112%) 2-Fluorobiphenyl 321 ug/L 500 64 (39%-112%) 2-Fluorophenol 364 ug/L 1000 36 (11%-79%) 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 792 ug/L 1000 79 (37%-132%) Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) CASNo. RT Est. Concentration Fit Qua/ Date Time: 09/09/2120 07 No Tentatively Identified Compounds Found The followin Pre Methods were erformed ----------------Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch ------------ SW846 35JOC 3510C BNA Liq. Prep-8270 Analysis SG2 09/08/21 1228 2171561 The following Analytical Methods were erformed --------------------------- Method Description Analyst Comments SW846 3510C/8270D SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. Notes: Column headers are defined as follows : DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 44 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Le/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Report Date: October 4, 2021 Company: Address: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Contact: Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Project: Tailings Characterization ---Client Sample ID: Slimes #2 Sample ID: 554861002 Matrix: Water Collect Date: 0l-SEP-21 08:35 Receive Date: 03-SEP-21 Collector: Client Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty High Rad Testing Alphaspec Th, Liquid "As Received" Thorium-228 u -24.3 +/-15.3 Thorium-230 2780 +/-142 Thorium-232 u 13.7 +/-14.8 GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received" Gross Radium Alpha 1920 +/-67. 7 Lucas Cell, Ra226, liquid "As Received" Radium-226 63.0 +/-12.5 U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 "As Received" Uranium-233/234 9210 +/-285 Uranium-235/236 582 +/-81.1 Uranium-238 9040 +/-282 The following Prep Methods were performed: Method Description GL-RAD-A-026 Laboratory Composi,-c- The following Analytical Methods were performed: MDC 83.9 68.5 48.5 21.2 25.6 99.3 75.8 70.6 ---Method Descri tion I DOE EML HASL-300, Th-01-RC Modified 2 EPA 903.0 3 EPA 903.1 Modified 4 DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Test Thorium-229 Tracer Alphaspec Th, Liquid "As Received" Barium Carrier GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received" Uranium-232 Tracer U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 "As Received" Notes: RL 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Analyst Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (I-sigma). Project: Client ID: DNMI00107 DNMIO0I Units PF DF Analyst Date pCi/L TCl 09/25/21 pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L TCl 09/28/21 pCi/L LXPI 10/03/21 pCi/L TCI 09/28/21 pCi/L pCi/L Date Time Prep Batch 2171222 Anal st Comments Result Nominal Recovery% 102 95.9 85.3 Time Batch Method 1004 2177500 0931 2177508 2 0722 2177509 3 0926 2178805 4 Acceptable Limits (15%-125%) (25%-125%) (15%-125%) SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. Page 99 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Report Date: October 4, 2021 Company: Address: Contact: Project: Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Tailings Characterization -------Slimes #2 554861002 Parameter ______ Q_u_alifier Result Uncertainty __ MDC ___ RL_ Column headers are defined as follows: DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 100 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Le/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Project: Client ID: DNMI00107 DNMI00l ------- ------------------ Units PF OF Analyst Date Time Batch Method GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Report Date: September 24, 2021 Company: Address: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. 225 Union Boulevard Contact: Project: Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector: Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Tailings Characterization Slimes #2 554861002 Water 0 l-SEP-21 08:35 03-SEP-21 Client ---------------------- Parameter Qualifier Result ------ Hazardous Waste ASTM D 5057 Specific Gravity "As Received" Specific Gravity 1.07 The following Analytical Methods were performed: DL 0.0100 RL 0.100 Project: Client ID: DNMI00107 DNMIO0I Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method none 1 VHI 09/14/21 0855 2173276 -------------------Method ___ De;.;;;s..:;.;cr~i=t=io=n:._ __________________ .....:A'-==n"-'l~0s=t'-'C"-'o=m=m=en=t=-s _________ _ ASTM D 5057 Notes: SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. Column headers are defined as follows: DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 81 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Le/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 888.888.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 11/11/21 Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Report Date: 10/15/21 Project: Annual Tailings 2021 Collection Date: 09/01/21 09:05 Lab ID: C21090172-008 Date Received: 09/03/21 Client Sample ID: Cell 3 Matrix: Aqueous MCL/ Analyses Result Units Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date / By MAJOR IONS Carbonate as CO3 236 mg/L 5 A2320 B 09/07/21 14:18 / kjp Bicarbonate as HCO3 175 mg/L 5 A2320 B 09/07/21 14: 18 / kjp Chloride 500 mg/L D 2 E300.0 09/08/21 20:46 / dmb Fluoride 2.2 mg/L 0.1 A4500-F C 09/14/21 14:07 / dmb Sulfate 1630 mg/L D 8 E300.0 09/08/21 20:46 I dmb Calcium 3 mg/L E200.7 09/16/21 13:54 / jcg Magnesium 11 mg/L E200.7 09/16/21 13:54 / jcg Potassium 20 mg/L E200.7 09/16/21 13:54 / jcg Sodium 1210 mg/L E200.7 09/16/21 13:54 / jcg PHYSICAL PROPERTIES Conductivity @ 25 C 5870 umhos/cm 5 A2510 B 09/07/21 13:40 / kjp pH 10 s.u. H 0.1 A4500-H B 09/07/21 13:40 / kjp pH Measurement Temp 17.1 ·c A4500-H B 09/07/21 13:40 / kjp Solids, Total Dissolved TDS@ 180 C 3930 mg/L D 40 A2540 C 09/07/21 13:57 / kjp NUTRIENTS Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 12.2 mg/L D 0.2 E353.2 09/13/21 14:54 / nts Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 278 mg/L D 100 E350.1 09/11/21 11 :42 / dmb METALS, DISSOLVED Arsenic 170 ug/L E200.8 09/26/21 08:11 / jcg Beryllium ND ug/L E200.7 09/16/21 13:54 / jcg Cadmium 2 ug/L 1 E200.8 09/26/21 08: 11 / jcg Chromium ND ug/L 5 E200.8 09/26/21 08: 11 / jcg Cobalt ND ug/L D 100 E200.8 09/28/21 11 :06 I srm Copper 454 ug/L D 100 E200.8 10/11/21 15:36 / srm Iron 519 ug/L D 100 E200.7 09/16/21 13:54 / jcg Lead 2 ug/L E200.8 09/26/21 08:11 / jcg Manganese 47 ug/L E200.8 09/26/21 08:11 / jcg Mercury ND mg/L 0.001 E245.1 09/17/21 19:08 / etad Molybdenum 759 ug/L E200.8 09/26/21 08: 11 / jcg Nickel 33 ug/L 5 E200.8 09/26/21 08:11 / jcg Selenium 135 ug/L D 50 E200.7 09/16/21 13:54 / jcg Silver ND ug/L 1 E200.8 09/26/21 08:11 / jcg Thallium 1.6 ug/L 0.5 E200.8 11/09/21 13:23 / srm Tin ND ug/L 50 E200.8 09/26/21 08:11 / jcg Uranium 533 ug/L D E200.8 09/26/21 08:11 / jcg Vanadium 6740 ug/L D 50 E200.7 09/16/21 13:54 I jcg Zinc 114 ug/L D 50 E200.7 09/16/21 13:54 / jcg DATA QUALITY Solids, Total Dissolved -Calculated 3750 mg/L 1.00 A1030 E 09/17/21 14:18 / jlw A/C Balance -4.90 % A1030 E 09/17/21 14: 18 / jlw Report RL -Analyte Reporting Limit MCL -Maximum Contaminant Level Definitions: QCL -Quality Control Limit ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) D -Reporting Limit (RL) increased due to sample matrix H -Analysis performed past the method holding time Page 18 of 56 El'\ERGY Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com Blllln1s, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 888.888.1175 • Helena, MT 871.472.0711 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 11/11/21 Report Date: 10/15/21 Collection Date: 09/01/21 09:05 DateReceived: 09/03/21 Matrix: Aqueous Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Project: Annual Tailings 2021 Lab ID: C21090172-008 Client Sample ID: Cell 3 Analyses DATA QUALITY Anions Cations Report Definitions: RL -Analyte Reporting Limit QCL -Quality Control Limit Result Units 59.7 meq/L 54.2 meq/L MCL/ Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date / By A1030 E 09/17/2114:18 I jlw A1030 E 09/17/21 14:18 / jlw MCL -Maximum Contaminant Level ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) Page 19 of 56 GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Address : 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Report Date: November 1, 2021 Contact: Project: Tailings Characterization --------------- Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector: ---------- Cell 3 554861008 Water 0 l-SEP-21 09:05 03-SEP-21 Client -------------- Proiect: DNMIO0 l 07 Client ID: DNMIO0l •arameter ____ Qualifier Re~ult O-=L,__ ___ --=R.:..:L=---~---=U..cc.c.nits PF OF_ AnalyJiL Date T ime Ba_trh Method volatile Organics 1W846 8260 Volatiles "As Received" 2-Butanone u Acetone Benzene u Carbon tetrachloride u Chloroform u Chloromethane u Methylene chloride u Naphthalene u Tetrahydrofuran u Toluene u Xylenes (total) u Surrogate/Tracer recovery Bromofluorobenzene Toluene-d8 l ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 ND 46.6 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Result 245 ug/L 269 ug/L 319 ug/L Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) CAS No. No Tentatively Identified Compounds Found The followin Anal tical Methods were erformed 8.34 25.0 ug/L 5 8.72 25.0 ug/L 5 1.67 5.00 ug/L 5 1.67 5.00 ug/L 5 1.67 5.00 ug/L 5 1.67 5.00 ug/L 5 2.50 25.0 ug/L 5 1.67 5.00 ug/L 5 8.34 25.0 ug/L 5 1.67 5.00 ug/L 5 5.00 15.0 ug/L 5 Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits 50.0 98 (72%-125%) 50.0 l08 (75%-123%) 50.0 128 (73%-129%) RT Est. Concentration Fit Qua/ -------------Method Description Analyst Comments SW846 8260D JEB 09/08/21 2002 21 71666 Date Time: 09/08/2120 02 Date Time: 09/08/2120 02 SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. Notes: Column headers are defined as follows: DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 27 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Le/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Address: 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: September 24, 2021 Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel Project: Tailings Characterization ---------- Client Sample ID: Cell 3 Proiect: DNMI00107 Sample ID: 554861008 Client ID: DNMIOOI Matrix: Water Collect Date: Ol-SEP-21 09:05 Receive Date: 03-SEP-21 Collector: Client ---- •arameter ualifier Result DL RL Units PF OF Analy.fil__Date Time Batch Method iemi-Volatile-GC/MS ,W846 35J0C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) ''As Received" 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 NMI 09/09/21 2253 2171562 1,2-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1,2-Dipheny !hydrazine u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1,3-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1,4-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1-Methylnaphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 2,4-Dichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 2,4-Dimethylphenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 2,4-Dinitrophenol u ND 50.0 200 ug/L 0.0100 2,4-Dinitrotoluene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 2,6-Dinitrotoluene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 2-Chloronaphthalene u ND 4.10 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 2-Chlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 2-Methyl-4,6-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 dinitropheno I 2-Methylnaphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 2-Nitrophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine u ND 33.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 4-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Bromophenylphenylethe r 4-Chloro-3-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 methylphenol 4-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Chlorophenylpheny lethe r 4-Nitrophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1 Acenaphthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 1 Acenaphthylene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 1 Anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 1 Benzi dine u ND 39.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 l Benzo( a )anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 I Benzo( a )pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 1 Benzo(b )fl uoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 1 Page 60 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Address: 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: September 24, 2021 Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel Project: Tailings Characterization Client Sample ID: Cell 3 Proiect: DNMI00107 Sample ID: __ 554861008 Client ID: DNMIO0I ------------ •arameter ualifier Result DL RL Units PF -DF Analy.n_Date Time Batch Method ,em i-Volatile-GC/MS 1W846 35J0C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) ''As Received" Benzo(ghi )pery Jene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Benzo(k}fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Butylbenzylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 Chrysene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Di-n-butylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 Di-n-octylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Diethylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 Dimethy lphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 Diphenylamine u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Fluorene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Hexachlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Hexachlorobutadiene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Hexachlorocyclopentadi u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 ene Hexachloroethane u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Jndeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Isophorone u ND 35.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 N-Methyl-N-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 nitrosomethy lam i ne N-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Nitrosodipropylamine Naphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Nitrobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Pentachlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Phenanthrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Phenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Pyridine u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 bis(2-Chloro-1-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 methylethyl)ether bis(2-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Chloroethoxy)methane bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 bis(2-u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Ethylhexyl)phthalate m,p-Cresols u ND 37.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 o-Cresol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Page 61 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Address : 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Report Date: September 24, 2021 Contact: Project: Tailings Characterization Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Cell 3 554861008 Proiect: DNMI00107 Client ID: DNMIO0l 'aramet~ Qualifier Result DL RL _ Units P:F ___ D~F~_ Anal st Date Time Batch Method lem i-Volatile-GC/MS 1W846 35J0C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) ''As Received" Surrogatellracer recovery Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits Date Time: 09/09/21 22 53 Phenol-d5 263 ug/L 1000 26 (15%-85%) p-Terphenyl-d14 310 ug/L 500 62 (24%-129%) Nitrobenzene-d5 330 ug/L 500 66 (39%-112%) 2-Fluorobiphenyl 346 ug/L 500 69 (39%-112%) 2-Fluorophenol 354 ug/L 1000 35 (11%-79%) 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 585 ug/L 1000 58 (37%-132%) Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) CASNo. RT Est. Concentration Fit Qua/ Date Time: 09/09/2122 53 No Tentatively Identified Compounds Found ----~-~Methods were pe_ri_o_rm_ed _____________________ _ Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch SW846 3510C 3510C BNA Liq. Prep-8270 Analysis SG2 09/08/21 1228 2171561 The following Analytical Methods were erformed Method Description Analyst Comments SW846 3510C/8270D SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. Notes: Column headers are defined as follows: DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 62 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Le/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Company : Address: Contact: Project: Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector: GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Tailings Characterization Cell 3 554861008 Water 0l-SEP-21 09:05 03-SEP-21 Client Project: Client ID: Report Date: October 4, 2021 DNMI00107 DNMIO0I Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC RL Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method -------- High Rad Testing Alphaspec Th, Liquid "As Received" Thorium-228 U Thorium-230 15.7 31.2 Thorium-232 U 14.4 GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received" Gross Radium Alpha U 18.5 Lucas Cell, Ra226, liquid "As Received" Radium-226 U 2.06 U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 "As Received" Uranium-233/234 144 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 u -7.14 209 +/-8.08 +/-9.l 0 +/-6.86 +/-7.69 +/-3.57 +/-43.8 +/-16.5 +/-46.4 The foll~wing Pre Methods were perfonned: ·---------Method Description GL-RAD-A-026 Laboratory Composite The following Analytical Methods were performed: Method Descri tion 2 3 DOE EML HASL-300, Th-01-RC Modified EPA 903.0 EPA 903.1 Modified 4 DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified 24.3 22.7 19.4 19.8 15.8 107 81.3 82.5 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Analyst pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L Date TC! 10/02/21 2103 2179693 TC! 09/28/21 0932 2177508 LXPI 10/03/21 0755 2177509 TC! 09/28/21 0926 2178805 Time Prep Batch -------2171222 ----'Analxst Comments Result Nominal Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Test ~--------Recovery% Acceptable Limits -----------------------"---Thorium-229 Tracer Barium Carrier Uranium-232 Tracer Notes: Alphaspec Th, Liquid "As Received" GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received" U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 "As Received" Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (I-sigma). 92. 8 (15%-125%) 90.6 (25%-125%) 88.4 (15%-125%) 2 3 4 SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. Page 111 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Report Date: October 4, 2021 Company : Address: Contact: Project: ---Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Tailings Characterization Cell 3 554861008 Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC Column headers are defined as follows: DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit --- Le/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit RL MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Page 112 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Project: Client ID: DNMI00107 DNMIOOI Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method ----- GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Report Date: September 24, 2021 Company : Address: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. 225 Union Boulevard Contact: Project: Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector: Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Tailings Characterization Cell 3 554861008 Water 01-SEP-21 09:05 03-SEP-21 Client ------------------~ Parameter Qualifier Result ----Hazardous Waste ASTM D 5057 Specific Gravity "As Received" Specific Gravity 0.984 The following Analytical Methods were performed: Method __ D_escri tion ASTMD 5057 Notes: DL 0.0100 RL 0.100 Project: Client ID: DNMI00107 DNMIO0l Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method none I VHI 09/14/21 0904 2173276 Anal st Comments __ ~~------ SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. Column headers are defined as follows: DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 87 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Le/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit EI\ERGY Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 888.886.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 11/11/21 Report Date: 10/15/21 Collection Date: 09/01/21 09:20 DateReceived: 09/03/21 Matrix: Aqueous Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Project: Annual Tailings 2021 Lab ID: C21090172-003 Client Sample ID: Cell 4A MCU Analyses Result Units Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date / By MAJOR IONS Carbonate as CO3 ND mg/L 5 A2320 B 09/07/21 13:53 / kjp Bicarbonate as HCO3 ND mg/L 5 A2320 8 09/07/21 13:53 / kjp Chloride 12700 mg/L D 50 E300.0 09/08/21 18:32 / dmb Fluoride 3190 mg/L D 50 A4500-F C 09/14/21 10:42 / dmb Sulfate 110000 mg/L D 200 E300.0 09/08/21 18:32 / dmb Calcium 637 mg/L D 6 E200.7 09/16/21 13:33 / jcg Magnesium 5020 mg/L 1 E200.7 09/16/21 13:33 / jcg Potassium 1730 mg/L D 6 E200.7 09/16/21 13:33 / jcg Sodium 18800 mg/L D 10 E200.7 09/16/21 13:33 / jcg PHYSICAL PROPERTIES Conductivity @ 25 C 91300 umhos/cm E 5 A2510 B 09/07/21 13:23 / kjp pH 2.2 s.u. H 0.1 A4500-H B 09/07/21 13:23 / kjp pH Measurement Temp 17.3 oc A4500-H B 09/07/21 13:23 / kjp Solids, Total Dissolved TDS@ 180 C 162000 mg/L D 2000 A2540 C 09/07/21 13:53 / kjp NUTRIENTS Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 112 mg/L D 0.5 E353.2 09/13/21 14:48 / nts Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 7250 mg/L D 200 E350.1 09/11/21 13:05 / dmb METALS, DISSOLVED Arsenic 68600 ug/L D 600 E200.7 09/16/21 13:33 / jcg Beryllium 448 ug/L D 20 E200.7 09/16/21 13:33 / jcg Cadmium 3540 ug/L D 600 E200.7 09/16/21 13:33 / jcg Chromium 8820 ug/L D 10 E200.8 09/26/21 07:33 / jcg Cobalt 30600 ug/L D 10 E200.8 09/26/21 07:33 / jcg Copper 557000 ug/L D 600 E200.7 09/16/21 13:33 / jcg Iron 3810000 ug/L D 500 E200.8 09/26/21 07:33 / jcg Lead 8380 ug/L D 2000 E200.7 09/16/21 13:33 / jcg Manganese 214000 ug/L D 30 E200.7 09/16/21 13:33 / jcg Mercury 0.0037 mg/L 0.0002 E245.1 09/17/21 18:54 / etad Molybdenum 32600 ug/L D 600 E200.7 09/16/21 13:33 / jcg Nickel 57100 ug/L D 30 E200.8 09/26/21 07:33 / jcg Selenium 3740 ug/L D 600 E200.7 09/16/21 13:33 / jcg Silver 466 ug/L D 4 E200.8 09/26/21 07:33 / jcg Thallium 185 ug/L D 10 E200.8 11/08/2112:17 / srm Tin 105 ug/L 50 E200.8 09/26/21 07:33 / jcg Uranium 43300 ug/L D 10 E200.8 09/26/21 07:33 / jcg Vanadium 237000 ug/L D 600 E200.7 09/16/21 13:33 / jcg Zinc 307000 ug/L D 600 E200.7 09/16/21 13:33 / jcg DATA QUALITY Solids, Total Dissolved -Calculated 152000 mg/L 1.00 A1030 E 09/17/21 14:12 / jlw A/C Balance -3.75 % A1030 E 09/17/21 14:12 / jlw Report RL -Analyte Reporting Limit MCL -Maximum Contaminant Level Definitions: QCL -Quality Control Limit ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) D -Reporting Limit (RL) increased due to sample matrix E -Estimated value -result exceeds the instrument upper quantitation limit H -Analysis performed past the method holding time Page 8 of 56 EN:RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 868.886.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 11/11/21 Report Date: 10/15/21 Collection Date: 09/01/21 09:20 DateReceived: 09/03/21 Matrix: Aqueous Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Project: Annual Tailings 2021 Lab ID: C21090172-003 Client Sample ID: Cell 4A Analyses DATA QUALITY Anions Cations Report Definitions: RL -Analyte Reporting Limit QCL -Quality Control Limit Result Units 2820 meq/L 2620 meq/L MCU Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date / By A1030 E 09/17/21 14:12 / jlw A1030 E 09/17/21 14:12 / jlw MCL -Maximum Contaminant Level ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) Page 9 of 56 GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Address : 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Report Date: November 1, 2021 Contact: Project: Tailings Characterization Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector: Cell 4A 554861003 Water 0I-SEP-21 09:20 03-SEP-21 Client Proi ect: DNMIO0 I 07 Client ID: DNMIO0l 1arameter Qualifier Result ____ _..D--=L=-------=RL=-----'U"-'n=i=ts----=-P-=-F ___ -'D==---F--A=naly!L_ Date Time Batch Method {olatile Organics ,W846 8260 Volatiles "As Received" 2-Butanone Acetone Benzene Carbon tetrachloride Chloroform Chloromethane Methylene chloride Naphthalene Tetrahydrofuran Toluene Xylenes (total) u u u u u u u u u u u Surrogatellracer recovery Bromofluorobenzene Toluene-d8 l ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Result 240 ug/L 261 ug/L 296 ug/L Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) CAS No. No Tentatively Identified Compounds Found The followin Analvtical Methods were erformed Method Description SW846 8260D 8.34 8.72 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 2.50 1.67 8.34 1.67 5.00 Nominal 50.0 50.0 50.0 RT 25.0 ug/L 5 JEB 09/08/21 1758 2171666 25.0 ug/L 5 5.00 ug/L 5 5.00 ug/L 5 5.00 ug/L 5 5.00 ug/L 5 25.0 ug/L 5 5.00 ug/L 5 25.0 ug/L 5 5.00 ug/L 5 15.0 ug/L 5 Recovery% Acceptable Limits Date Time: 09/08121 17 58 96 (72%-125%) 104 (75%-123%) 118 (73%-129%) Est. Concentration Fit Qua/ Date Time: 09/08/21 17 58 Analyst Comments SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. Notes: Column headers are defined as follows: DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 22 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Le/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Address: 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: September 24, 2021 Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel Project: Tailings Characterization -------- Client Sample ID: Cell 4A Proiect: DNMI00107 Sample ID: 554861003 Client ID: DNMIOOJ Matrix: Water Collect Date: 0 l-SEP-21 09:20 Receive Date: 03-SEP-21 Collector: Client -------- >arameter QuaJifier Result DL RL Unjts PF _ _pF _Analyst Date Time Batch Method ,em i-Volatile-GC/MS >W846 3510C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) "As Received" 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 NMI 09/09/21 2035 2171562 1,2-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1,2-Dipheny !hydrazine u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1,3-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1,4-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1-Methylnaphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 2,4-Dichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 2,4-Dimethylphenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 2,4-Dinitrophenol u ND 50.0 200 ug/L 0.0100 2,4-Dinitrotoluene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 2,6-Dinitrotoluene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 2-Chloronaphthalene u ND 4.10 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 2-Chlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 2-Methyl-4,6-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 dinitrophenol 2-Methylnaphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 1 2-Nitrophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine u ND 33.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 I 4-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1 Bromophenylphenylethe r 4-Chloro-3-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 methylphenol 4-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Chlorophenylphenylethe r 4-Nitrophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Acenaphthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Acenaphthylene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Benzidine u ND 39.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Benzo( a )anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Benzo( a )pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Benzo(b )fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Page 45 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Address: 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: September 24, 2021 Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel Project: Tailings Characterization ------------~ -- Client Sample ID: Cell 4A Proiect: DNMIO0J07 Samele ID: 554861003 Client ID: DNMIO0I >aramcter _Qualifier Result DL RL U!!J!s PF _!)F Anal st Dllte Time Batch Method lem i-Volatile-GC/MS ,W846 35J0C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) ''As Received" Benzo(ghi)perylene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Benzo(k)fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Butylbenzylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 Chrysene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Di-n-butylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 Di-n-octylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 Dibenzo( a,h )anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Diethylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 Dimethylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 Diphenylamine u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Fluorene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Hexachlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Hexachlorobutadiene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Hexachlorocyclopentadi u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 ene Hexachloroethane u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 lsophorone u ND 35.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 N-Methyl-N-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 nitrosomethy !amine N-u ND 30.0 JOO ug/L 0.0100 N itrosodi propy !amine Naphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Nitro benzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Pentachlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Phenanthrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Phenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Pyridine u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 bis(2-Chloro-1-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 methylethyl)ether bis(2-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Chloroethoxy)methane bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 bis(2-u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Ethy lhexy I )phthalate m,p-Cresols u ND 37.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 o-Cresol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Page 46 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Address : 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Report Date: September 24, 2021 Contact: Project: Tailings Characterization Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Cell 4A 554861003 Proiect: DNMI00107 Client ID: DNMIO0J >aram=-=e=te'-'---r __ _Qualifier Rem!!_ ___ ~D_L ___ _ RL __ Units PF __ DF Analy§t Dl!!L Time Batch Method ,emi-Volatile-GC/MS >W846 3510C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) ''As Received" Surrogate/Tracer recovery p-Terphenyl-d14 Phenol-d5 Nitrobenzene-d5 2-Fluorobiphenyl 2-Fluorophenol 2,4,6-Tribromophenol Result Nominal 255 ug/L 350 ug/L 350 ug/L 364 ug/L 399 ug/L 723 ug/L Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) CAS No. No Tentatively Identified Compounds Found The followin Prep Methods were erformed Method Description SW846 3510C SW846 3510C 3510C BNA Liq. Prep-8270 Analysis 3510C BNA Liq. Prep-8270 Analysis The followin Anal tical Methods were erformed Method Description SW846 3510C/8270D 500 1000 500 500 1000 1000 RT Recovery% Acceptable Limits 51 (24%-129%) 35 (15%-85%) 70 (39%-112%) 73 (39%-112%) 40 (11%-79%) 72 (37%-132%) Est. Concentration Fit Qua/ Analyst LWl SG2 Date 09/22/21 09/08/21 Time 1120 1228 Analyst Comments Date Time: Date Time: Prep Batch 2176674 2171561 09/09121 20 35 09/09/21 20 35 SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. Notes: Column headers are defined as follows: DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 47 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Le/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Company: Address : Contact: Project: ---Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector: GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Tailings Characterization Cell 4A 554861003 Water 0l-SEP-21 09:20 03-SEP-21 Client Report Date: October 4, 2021 Project: DNMIO0 107 Client ID: DNMIO0 1 Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC RL Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method High Rad Testing Alphaspec Th, Liquid "As Received" Thorium-228 Thorium-230 1000 6.62E+05 Thorium-232 6240 GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received" Gross Radium Alpha 1.22E+05 Lucas Cell, Ra226, liquid "As Received" Radium-226 686 U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 "As Received" Uranium-233/234 18000 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 1150 17900 +/-89.9 +/-2270 +/-220 +/-507 +/-37.1 +/-438 +/-125 +/-437 The following Prep Methods were erfonned: _____ _ --- 48.8 1.00 pCi/L 67.0 1.00 pCi/L 48.8 1.00 pCi/L 22.0 1.00 pCi/L 15.3 1.00 pCi/L 118 1.00 pCi/L 102 1.00 pCi/L 86.0 1.00 pCi/L Method Description AnalyE_ Date GL-RAD-A-026 Laboratory Composite The following Analytical Methods were perfonned: ----~ Method Descri tfon DOE EML HASL-300, Th-01-RC Modified 2 EPA 903.0 3 EPA 903.1 Modified 4 DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified ~urrogate/Tracer Recovery Test Thorium-229 Tracer Barium Carrier Uranium-232 Tracer Notes: Alphaspec Th, Liquid "As Received" GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received" U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 "As Received" Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (I-sigma). Result TC! 09/25/21 1004 2177500 TC! 09/28/21 0932 2177508 LXPI 10/03/21 0722 2177509 TCI 09/28/21 0926 2178805 Time Prep Batch 2171222 2 3 4 Analyst Com=m'-"e=n=ts---_________ _ Nominal Recovery% 93.4 95.2 70.1 Acceptable Limits (15%-125%) (25%-125%) (15%-125%) SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. Page 101 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Company: Address: Contact: Project: Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Certificate of Analysis Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Tailings Characterization ---Cell 4A 554861003 Project: Client ID: Report Date: October 4, 2021 DNMIO0I07 DNMIO0I Parameter Qualifier Resu_!!_ Uncertainty __ M_D_C ___ RL __ U_nits PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method Column headers are defined as follows: DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 102 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Le/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Report Date: September 24, 2021 Company: Address: Contact: Project: Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Tailings Characterization Cell4A 554861003 Water ------ 0 l-SEP-21 09:20 03-SEP-21 Client Parameter Qualifier Result DL --------Hazardous Waste ASTM D 5057 Specific Gravity "As Received" RL Specific Gravity 1. I I 0.0100 0.100 The following Analytical Methods were performed: Project: Client ID: DNMI00107 DNMIO0I ----------- Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method -- none I VHI 09/14/21 0857 2173276 -----------------Method Descri tion Anal st Comments _________ _ ASTMD5057 Notes: SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. olumn headers are defined as follows: DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 82 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Le/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit EN:RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 886.886.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 11/11/21 Report Date: 10/15/21 Collection Date: 09/01/21 09:35 DateReceived: 09/03/21 Matrix: Aqueous Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Project: Annual Tailings 2021 Lab ID: C21090172-004 Client Sample ID: Cell 4A LOS MCL/ Analyses Result Units Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date/ By MAJOR IONS Carbonate as CO3 ND mg/L 5 A2320 B 09/07/21 13:59 / kjp Bicarbonate as HCO3 ND mg/L 5 A2320 B 09/07/21 13:59 / kjp Chloride 6510 mg/L D 50 E300.0 09/08/21 18:51 / dmb Fluoride 2240 mg/L D 50 A4500-F C 09/14/21 10:48 I dmb Sulfate 72900 mg/L D 200 E300.0 09/08/21 18:51 / dmb Calcium 500 mg/L D 6 E200.7 09/16/21 13:37 / jcg Magnesium 3780 mg/L D 2 E200.8 09/26/21 07:52 / jcg Potassium 635 mg/L D 6 E200.7 09/16/21 13:37 / jcg Sodium 9550 mg/L D 10 E200.7 09/16/21 13:37 / jcg PHYSICAL PROPERTIES Conductivity @ 25 C 65900 umhos/cm E 5 A2510 B 09/07/21 13:26 / kjp pH 2.4 s.u. H 0.1 A4500-H B 09/07/21 13:26 / kjp pH Measurement Temp 16.7 ·c A4500-H B 09/07/21 13:26 / kjp Solids, Total Dissolved TDS@ 180 C 105000 mg/L D 1000 A2540 C 09/07/21 13:54 / kjp NUTRIENTS Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 161 mg/L D 0.5 E353.2 09/13/21 14:50 I nts Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 3680 mg/L D 100 E350.1 09/11/21 11 :37 / dmb METALS, DISSOLVED Arsenic 32300 ug/L D 600 E200.7 09/16/21 13:37 / jcg Beryllium 323 ug/L D 20 E200.7 09/16/21 13:37 / jcg Cadmium 4220 ug/L D 600 E200.7 09/16/21 13:37 / jcg Chromium 5200 ug/L D 10 E200.8 09/26/21 07:52 / jcg Cobalt 73400 ug/L D 100 E200.8 09/28/21 09:48 I srm Copper 322000 ug/L D 600 E200.7 09/16/21 13:37 / jcg Iron 1370000 ug/L D 500 E200.8 09/26/21 07:52 / jcg Lead 1120 ug/L D 10 E200.8 09/26/21 07:52 I jcg Manganese 195000 ug/L D 30 E200.7 09/16/21 13:37 / jcg Mercury 0.0003 mg/L 0.0002 E245.1 09/17/21 18:57 / etad Molybdenum 4090 ug/L D 600 E200.7 09/16/21 13:37 / jcg Nickel 67700 ug/L D 30 E200.8 09/26/21 07:52 I jcg Selenium 1960 ug/L D 20 E200.8 09/26/21 07:52 / jcg Silver 212 ug/L D 4 E200.8 09/26/21 07:52 / jcg Thallium 245 ug/L D 20 E200.8 11/05/2115:16 / srm Tin ND ug/L 50 E200.8 09/26/21 07:52 I jcg Uranium 76000 ug/L D 10 E200.8 09/26/21 07:52 I jcg Vanadium 458000 ug/L D 600 E200.7 09/16/21 13:37 / jcg Zinc 380000 ug/L D 600 E200.7 09/16/21 13:37 / jcg DATA QUALITY Solids, Total Dissolved -Calculated 97800 mg/L 1.00 A1030 E 09/17/2114:12 / jlw NC Balance -0.15 % A1030 E 09/17/2114:12 / jlw Report RL -Analyte Reporting Limit MCL -Maximum Contaminant Level Definitions: QCL -Quality Control Limit ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) D -Reporting Limit (RL) increased due to sample matrix E -Estimated value -result exceeds the instrument upper quantitation limit H -Analysis performed past the method holding time Page 10 of 56 EN:RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 868.886.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 11/11/21 Report Date: 10/15/21 Collection Date: 09/01/21 09:35 DateReceived: 09/03/21 Matrix: Aqueous Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Project: Annual Tailings 2021 Lab ID: C21090172-004 Client Sample ID: Cell 4A LOS Analyses DATA QUALITY Anions Cations Report Definitions: Rl -Analyte Reporting Limit QCL -Quality Control Limit Result Units 1830 meq/L 1820 meq/L MCL/ Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date / By A1030 E 09/17/21 14:12 / jlw A1030 E 09/17/21 14:12 / jlw MCL -Maximum Contaminant Level ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) Page 11 of 56 GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Address : 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Report Date: November I, 2021 Contact: Project: Tailings Characterization Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector: Cell 4A LDS 554861004 Water 0 l-SEP-21 09:35 03-SEP-21 Client ---- Proiect: DNMI00107 Client ID: DNMIO0I 'a=r=a=m=et=e"--r ____ --"'--ualifier Res=ul"'-t ____ --=D"-"L"-RL _ Units PF__ DF Anal t Da!L._Jime Batch Method (olatile Organics >W846 8260 Volatiles "As Received" 2-Butanone Acetone Benzene Carbon tetrachloride Chloroform Chloromethane Methylene chloride Naphthalene Tetrahydrofuran Toluene Xylenes (total) u u u u u u u u Surrogate/Tracer recovery Bromofluorobenzene Toluene-d8 l ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 92.2 262 ND ND 47.2 ND ND ND ND ND ND Result 244 ug/L 267 ug/L 286 ug/L Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) CAS No. 8.34 8.72 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 2.50 1.67 8.34 1.67 5.00 Nominal 50.0 50.0 50.0 RT 25.0 ug/L 25.0 ug/L 5.00 ug/L 5.00 ug/L 5.00 ug/L 5.00 ug/L 25.0 ug/L 5.00 ug/L 25.0 ug/L 5.00 ug/L 15.0 ug/L Recovery% Acceptable limits 98 (72%-125%) 107 (75%-123%) 114 (73%-129%) Est. Concentration Fit The followin Anal)'tical Methods were e_r_fo_r_m_e_d ___________ _ 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Qua/ Method Description Analyst Comments ------------------------------ SW846 8260D JEB 09/08/21 1823 2171666 Date Time: 09/08121 18 23 Date Time: 09/08/2118 23 SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. Notes: Column headers are defined as follows: DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 23 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Le/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Address: 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: September 24, 202 I Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel Project: Tailings Characterization ---~ Client Sample ID: Cell 4A LDS Proiect: DNMIOOI07 Sample ID: 554861004 Client ID: DNMIOOI Matrix: Water Collect Date: Ol-SEP-21 09:35 Receive Date: 03-SEP-21 Collector: Client -- 'arameter ualifier Result DL RL __ _!L nits PF DF Analvst Date Time Batch Method ,em i-Volatile-GC/MS )W846 35/0Cl8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) ''As Received" I ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 NMI 09/09/21 2102 2171562 1,2-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1,2-Dipheny I hydrazine u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1,3-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1,4-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1-Methy !naphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 2,4-Dichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 2,4-Dimethylphenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 2,4-Dinitrophenol u ND 50.0 200 ug/L 0.0100 2,4-Dinitrotoluene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 2,6-Dinitrotoluene u ND 30.0 JOO ug/L 0.0100 2-Chloronaphthalene u ND 4.10 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 2-Chlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 2-Methyl-4,6-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 dinitrophenol 2-Methy !naphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 2-Nitrophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine u ND 33.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 4-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Bromophenylphenylethe r 4-Chloro-3-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 methylphenol 4-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Chlorophenylphenylethe r 4-Nitrophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Acenaphthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Acenaphthylene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Benzidine u ND 39.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Benzo( a )anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Benzo( a )pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Benzo(b )fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Page 48 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Address: 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: September 24, 2021 Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel Project: Tailings Characterization ---- Client Sample ID: Cell 4A LDS Proiect: DNMI00107 Sample ID: 554861004 Client ID: DNMIOOI -- >arameter _Qmllifier Result DL -RL __ nlli_ PF DF Annly L D?te Time Batch Met~od ;emi-Volatile-GC/MS ,W846 3510C/8270D SVOA (Separato,y Funnel) "As Received" Benzo(ghi )pery Jene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 I Benzo(k)fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 I Butylbenzylphthalate u ND 3.00 JOO ug/L 0.0100 1 Chrysene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 I Di-n-butylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 I Di-n-octy lphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 I Dibenzo( a,h )anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 I Diethylphthalate u ND 3.00 JOO ug/L 0.0100 1 Dimethylphthalate u ND 3.00 JOO ug/L 0.0100 I Diphenylamine u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1 Fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 1 Fluorene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 1 Hexachlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 I Hexachlorobutadiene u ND 30.0 JOO ug/L 0.0100 1 Hexachlorocyclopentadi u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1 ene Hexachloroethane u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 lsophorone u ND 35.0 JOO ug/L 0.0100 N-Methyl-N-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 nitrosomethy lamine N-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Nitrosodipropy I amine Naphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 I Nitro benzene u ND 30.0 JOO ug/L 0.0100 I Pentachlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 I Phenanthrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 1 Phenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1 Pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 1 Pyridine u ND 30.0 JOO ug/L 0.0100 I bis(2-Chloro-1-u ND 30.0 JOO ug/L 0.0100 1 methylethyl)ether bis(2-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Chloroethoxy)methane bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 bis(2-u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Ethy lhexy 1 )phthalate m,p-Cresols u ND 37.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 o-Cresol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Page 49 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Address : 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Report Date: September 24, 2021 Contact: Project: Tailings Characterization ---------------- Client Sample ID: Sample I_D_: __ Cell 4A LDS 554861004 Proiect: DNMI00107 Client ID: DNMIO0 1 >aramc=t=er'------ualifier Result DL JlL__ Units _fF ___ DF Anal st Date Time Bat h _lethod ,emi-Volatile-GC/MS ,W846 3510C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) "As Received" Surrogate/Tracer recovery p-Terphenyl-d14 Phenol-d5 Result Nominal N itrobenzene-d5 2-Fluorobiphenyl 2-Fluorophenol 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 225 ug/L 297 ug/L 322 ug/L 334 ug/L 393 ug/L 831 ug/L Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) CAS No. The followin Prep Methods were erformed Method Description SW846 3510C 3510C BNA Liq. Prep-8270 Analysis 500 1000 500 500 1000 1000 RT Recovery% Acceptable Limits Date Time: 09/09/2121 02 45 (24%-129%) 30 (15%-85%) 64 (39%-112%) 67 (39%-112%) 39 (11%-79%) 83 (37%-132%) Est. Concentration Fit Qua/ Date Time: 09/09/2121 02 Analyst Date Time Prep Batch -----------------SG2 09/08/21 1228 2171561 The followin _Analytical Methods were erfo_r_m_e_d _______________________________ _ Method Description Analyst Comments ---SW846 3510C/8270D SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. Notes: Column headers are defined as follows: DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 50 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Le/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Company: Address: Contact: Project: Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector: GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Tailings Characterization -------------Cell 4A LDS Project: 554861004 Client ID: Water 0l-SEP-21 09:35 03-SEP-21 Client Report Date: October 4, 2021 DNMI00107 DNMIO0l Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC RL Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method High Rad Testing Alphaspec Th, Liquid "As Received" Thorium-228 462 +/-61.1 54.5 1.00 pCi/L TC! 09/25/21 1004 2177500 Thorium-230 I.OIE+05 +/-872 73.5 1.00 pCi/L Thorium-232 731 +/-74.7 31.2 1.00 pCi/L GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received" Gross Radium Alpha 23700 +/-226 18.4 1.00 pCi/L TC! 09/28/21 0932 2177508 Lucas Cell, Ra226, liquid "As Received" Radium-226 33.4 +/-8.06 13.5 1.00 pCi/L LXPI 10/03/21 0722 2177509 U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 "As Received" Uranium-233/234 38200 +/-810 187 1.00 pCi/L TC! 09/28/21 0926 2178805 Uranium-235/236 1720 +/-193 140 1.00 pCi/L Uranium-238 37500 +/-802 162 1.00 pCi/L The following Prep Methods were performed: -----Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch GL-RAD-A-026 Laboratory Composite 2171222 The following Analytical Methods were performed: ----------------Method Descri tion Anal st Comments I DOE EML HASL-300, Th-01-RC Modified 2 EPA 903.0 3 EPA 903.1 Modified 4 DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Test Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits -~------------------------------~--Thorium-229 Tracer Barium Carrier Uranium-232 Tracer Notes: Alphaspec Th, Liquid "As Received" GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received" U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 "As Received" Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (I-sigma). 97. 9 (15%-125%) 96.3 (25%-125%) 43.5 (15%-125%) 2 3 4 SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. Page 103 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Address : 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel Project: Tailings Characterization ----------------Client Sample ID: Cell 4A LDS Project: Sample ID: 554861004 Client ID: ------------------------ Report Date: October 4, 2021 DNMI00107 DNMIO0l Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC RL Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method Column headers are defined as follows: DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 104 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Le/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Report Date: September 24, 2021 Company: Address: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel Project: Tailings Characterization -------------Client Sample ID: Cell 4A LDS Sample ID: 554861004 Matrix: Water Collect Date: 0l-SEP-21 09:35 Receive Date: 03-SEP-21 Collector: Client ----------- Project: Client ID: -----------DNMI00107 DNMIO0I ---------------Parameter Qualifier Result DL RL Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method ------Hazardous Waste ASTM D 5057 Specific Gravity "As Received" Specific Gravity 1.08 0.0100 0.100 none I VHI 09/14/21 0858 2173276 The following Analytical Methods were performed: --'----------Method Descri tion Anal st Comments I ASTM D 5057 Notes: SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. Column headers are defined as follows: DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 83 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Le/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit EN:RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 866.686.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 11 /11 /21 Report Date: 10/15/21 Collection Date: 09/01/21 09:45 DateReceived: 09/03/21 Matrix: Aqueous Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Project: Annual Tailings 2021 Lab ID: C21090172-005 Client Sample ID: Cell 48 MCL/ Analyses Result Units Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date / By MAJOR IONS Carbonate as CO3 ND mg/L 5 A2320 B 09/07/21 14:02 / kjp Bicarbonate as HCO3 ND mg/L 5 A2320 B 09/07/21 14:02 I kjp Chloride 44800 mg/L D 50 E300.0 09/08/21 19:10 / dmb Fluoride 7000 mg/L D 200 A4500-F C 09/14/21 13:58 / dmb Sulfate 259000 mg/L D 800 E300.0 09/09/21 21 :44 / dmb Calcium 534 mg/L D 300 E200.7 09/21/21 05:21 / jcg Magnesium 8200 mg/L D 2 E200.8 09/26/21 07:57 I jcg Potassium 3540 mg/L D 6 E200.7 09/16/21 13:42 / jcg Sodium 54000 mg/L D 500 E200.7 09/21/21 05:21 / jcg PHYSICAL PROPERTIES Conductivity @ 25 C 109000 umhos/cm E 5 A2510 B 09/07/21 13:29 / kjp pH 1.2 s.u. H 0.1 A4500-H B 09/07/21 13:29 / kjp pH Measurement Temp 19.0 oc A4500-H B 09/07/21 13:29 / kjp Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 423000 mg/L DE 2000 A2540 C 09/07/21 13:54 / kjp Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 433000 mg/L DH 5000 A2540 C 09/08/21 15:59 / kjp -E -TDS residue exceeded the 200 mg limit per method. The sample was re-analyzed with a lower volume to obtain a valid result. The E qualifed data is reported at client request. -H -Original analysis was done within hold time. Data is from recheck analysls. NUTRIENTS Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N Nitrogen, Ammonia as N METALS, DISSOLVED Arsenic Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Manganese Mercury Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Tin Uranium Vanadium Zinc Report Definitions: RL -Analyte Reporting Limit QCL -Quality Control Limit 286 mg/L 9100 mg/L 307000 ug/L 1280 ug/L 6760 ug/L 16600 ug/L 39700 ug/L 1170000 ug/L 7610000 ug/L 26000 ug/L 602000 ug/L 0.0086 mg/L 95600 ug/L 48900 ug/L 9080 ug/L 741 ug/L 2160 ug/L 879 ug/L 279000 ug/L 1060000 ug/L 475000 ug/L D -Reporting Limit (RL) increased due to sample matrix H -Analysis performed past the method holding time D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D 1 E353.2 09/13/21 14:51 / nts 200 E350.1 09/11 /21 13:07 / dmb 600 E200.7 09/16/21 13:42 / jcg 20 E200.7 09/16/21 13:42 / jcg 600 E200.7 09/16/21 13:42 / jcg 600 E200.7 09/16/21 13:42 / jcg 20000 E200.7 09/21/21 05:21 I jcg 600 E200.7 09/16/21 13:42 / jcg 60000 E200.7 09/21/21 05:21 / jcg 2000 E200.7 09/16/21 13:42 / jcg 30 E200.7 09/16/21 13:42 / jcg 0.0002 E245.1 09/17/21 18:59 / etad 20000 E200.7 09/21/21 05:21 / jcg 30 E200.8 09/26/21 07:57 I jcg 600 E200.7 09/16/21 13:42 / jcg 4 E200.8 09/26/21 07:57 I jcg 1000 E200.8 09/28/21 10:04 I srm 50 E200.8 09/26/21 07:57 I jcg 100 E200.8 09/28/21 10:04 I srm 600 E200.7 09/16/21 13:42 / jcg 20000 E200.7 09/21/21 05:21 I jcg MCL -Maximum Contaminant Level ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) E -Estimated value -result exceeds the instrument upper quantitation limit Page 12 of 56 EI\ERGY Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 866.886.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 11/11/21 Report Date: 10/15/21 Collection Date: 09/01/21 09:45 DateReceived: 09/03/21 Matrix: Aqueous Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Project: Annual Tailings 2021 Lab ID: C21090172-005 Client Sample ID: Cell 48 Analyses DATA QUALITY Solids, Total Dissolved -Calculated A/C Balance Anions Cations Cation/Anion Balance includes selected metals Report Definitions: RL -Analyte Reporting Limit QCL -Quality Control Limit Result Units 379000 mg/L -1 .18 % 7040 meq/L 6880 meq/L MCL/ Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date / By 1.00 A1030 E 09/22/21 11 :27 / jlw A1030 E 09/22/21 11 :27 I jlw A1030 E 09/22/21 11 :27 / jlw A1030 E 09/22/21 11 :27 / jlw MCL -Maximum Contaminant Level ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) Page 13 of 56 GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Address : 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Report Date: November I, 2021 Contact: Project: Tailings Characterization Client Sample ID: Cell 4B 554861005 Water Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector: __ Qualifier Result (olatile Organics >W846 8260 Volatiles "As Received" 2-Butanone Acetone Benzene Carbon tetrachloride Chloroform Chloromethane Methylene chloride Naphthalene Tetrahydrofuran Toluene Xylenes (total) u u u u u u u u Surrogate/Tracer recovery Bromofluorobenzene Toluene-d8 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 57.0 97.6 ND ND ND ND ND ND 164 ND ND 0 I-SEP-2 I 09:45 03-SEP-21 Client Result 244 ug/L 265 ug/L 295 ug/L --~- DL 8.34 8.72 l.67 1.67 l.67 1.67 2.50 1.67 8.34 l.67 5.00 Nominal 50.0 50.0 50.0 Proiect: DNMIO0 I 07 Client ID: DNMIO0I RL Units ~PF~• __ DE_ !_\na!y.tl_ Date Time Bntch Method 25.0 ug/L 5 JEB 09/08/21 1847 2171666 25.0 ug/L 5 5.00 ug/L 5 5.00 ug/L 5 5.00 ug/L 5 5.00 ug/L 5 25.0 ug/L 5 5.00 ug/L 5 25.0 ug/L 5 5.00 ug/L 5 15.0 ug/L 5 Recovery% Acceptable Limits Date Time: 09/08/2118 47 98 (72%-125%) 106 (75%-123%) 118 (73%-129%) Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) CAS No. RT Est. Concentration Fit Qua/ Date Time: 09/08/21 18 47 The followin Analytical Methods were ~_e_ri_o_rm_ed ________________ _ Method Description Analyst Comments SW846 8260D SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. Notes: Column headers are defined as follows: DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 24 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Le/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Address : 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Contact: Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Project: Tailings Characterization Client Sample ID: Cell 48 Sample ID: 554861005 Matrix: Water Collect Date: Ol-SEP-21 09:45 Receive Date: 03-SEP-21 Collector: Client ------ •arameter Qua lifiei_:_____B.esu It DL RL ,emi-Volatile-GC/MS ,W846 3510C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) "As Received" 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 1,2-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 1,2-Dipheny !hydrazine u ND 30.0 100 1,3-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 1,4-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 1-Methy I naphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 2,4-Dichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 2,4-Dimethylphenol u ND 30.0 100 2,4-Dinitrophenol u ND 50.0 200 2,4-Dinitrotoluene u ND 30.0 100 2,6-Dinitrotoluene u ND 30.0 100 2-Chloronaphthalene u ND 4.10 10.0 2-Chlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 2-Methyl-4,6-u ND 30.0 100 dinitrophenol 2-Methylnaphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 2-Nitrophenol u ND 30.0 100 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine u ND 33.0 100 4-u ND 30.0 100 Bromophenylphenylethe r 4-Chloro-3-u ND 30.0 100 methylphenol 4-u ND 30.0 100 Chlorophenylphenylethe r 4-Nitrophenol u ND 30.0 100 Acenaphthene u ND 3.00 10.0 Acenaphthylene u ND 3.00 10.0 Anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 Benzi dine u ND 39.0 100 Benzo( a )anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 Benzo( a)pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 Benzo(b )fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 Page 51 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Report Date: September 24, 2021 ------ Proiect: DNMI00107 Client ID: DNMIOOl __ .-!!lts PF DF nal t Date Time Batch Method ug/L 0.0100 NMI 09/09/2 I 2130 2171562 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 ug/L 0.0100 GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Address: 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: September 24, 2021 Contact: Ms. Kathy Weine1 Project: Tailings Characterization ---- Client Sample ID: Cell 4B Proiect: DNMI00107 Sample ID: 554861005 Client ID: DNMIO0l 'arameter ualifier Result DL RL _ __1J n it.!._f F _ DF Analyst~Date Time Batch Method ,emi-Volatile-GC/MS ,W846 35J0C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) "As Received" Benzo(ghi )pery Jene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Benzo(k)fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Buty lbenzylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 Chrysene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Di-n-buty lphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 Di-n-octylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 Dibenzo( a,h)anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Diethylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 Dimethylphtha1ate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 Diphenylamine u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Fluorene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Hexachlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Hexachlorobutadiene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Hexachlorocyclopentadi u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 ene Hexachloroethane u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 lndeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Isophorone u ND 35.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 N-Methyl-N-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 nitrosomethylamine N-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Nitrosodipropylamine Naphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Nitro benzene u ND 30.0 JOO ug/L 0.0100 Pentachlorophenol u ND 30.0 JOO ug/L 0.0100 Phenanthrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Phenol u ND 30.0 JOO ug/L 0.0100 Pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Pyridine 118 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 bis(2-Chloro-1-u ND 30.0 JOO ug/L 0.0100 methylethyl)ether bis(2-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Chloroethoxy)methane bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether u ND 30.0 JOO ug/L 0.0100 bis(2-u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Ethylhexy l)phthalate m,p-Cresols u ND 37.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 o-Cresol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Page 52 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Address : 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Report Date: September 24, 2021 Contact: Project: Tailings Characterization Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Cell 4B 554861005 Proiect: DNMIO0 l 07 Client ID: DNMIO0 I ualifier Re!!!!.. ____ DL ____ RL __ Uoi.~ts~~P~F ___ ~D~F_l\!l!IJY~L__J)ate Time Batch Method ,emi-Volatile-GC/MS ,W846 35J0C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) ''As Received" Surrogatellracer recovery Result Nominal p-Terpheny 1-d 14 185 ug/L Nitrobenzene-d5 315 ug/L Phenol-d5 331 ug/L 2-Fluorobiphenyl 345 ug/L 2-Fluorophenol 347 ug/L 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 663 ug/L Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) CASNo. No Tentatively Identified Compounds Found The fo llowin Pre Methods were erformed Method Description SW846 3510C SW846 3510C 3510C BNA Liq. Prep-8270 Analysis 3510C BNA Liq. Prep-8270 Analysis The followin Analytical Methods were 11erformed Method Description ---- SW846 35\0C/8270D 500 500 1000 500 1000 1000 RT Recovery% Acceptable Limits 37 (24%-129%) 63 (39%-112%) 33 (15%-85%) 69 (39%-112%) 35 (11%-79%) 66 (37%-132%) Esl Concentration Fit Analyst LWl SG2 Date 09/22/21 09/08/21 Date Time: Qua/ Date Time: Time Prep Batch 1120 1228 2176674 2171561 Analyst Comments 09/09/21 21 30 09/09/21 21 30 SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. Notes: Column headers are defined as follows: DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 53 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Le/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Report Date: October 4, 2021 Company: Address : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Contact: Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Project: Tailings Characterization Client Sample ID: Cell 4B Sample ID: 554861005 Matrix: Water Collect Date: 01-SEP-2I 09:45 Receive Date: 03-SEP-21 Collector: Client Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty ------- High Rad Testing Alphaspec Th, Liquid "As Received" Thorium-228 1590 +/-108 Thorium-230 5.23E+05 +/-1920 Thorium-232 3240 +/-152 GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received" Gross Radium Alpha 87400 +/-448 Lucas Cell, Ra226, liquid "As Received" Radium-226 495 +/-30.3 U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 "As Received" Uranium-233/234 58400 +/-1170 Uranium-235/236 3780 +/-332 Uranium-238 60000 +/-1180 The following Prep Methods were performed: Method Description OL-RAD-A-026 Laboratory Compo ii The following Analytical Methods were performed: Method Descri tion DOE EML HASL-300, Th-01-RC Modified 2 EPA 903.0 3 EPA 903.1 Modified 4 DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified MDC 64.9 75.7 53.2 20.0 24.0 282 189 265 RL 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Analyst Project: Client ID: DNMI00107 DNMIO0I -------- Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method ----- pCi/L TCI 09/25/21 1004 2177500 pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L TCI 09/28/21 0932 2177508 2 pCi/L LXPl 10/03/21 0722 2177509 3 pCi/L TC I 09/28/21 0926 2178805 4 pCi/L pCi/L Date Time Prep Batch ----2171222 Anal st Comments Result Nominal Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Test Recovery% Acceptable Limits -----------------------<-----"-Thorium-229 Tracer Barium Carrier Uranium-232 Tracer Notes: Alphaspec Th, Liquid "As Received" GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received" U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 "As Received" Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (I-sigma). 99. 8 (15%-125%) 94.8 (25%-125%) 31.5 (15%-125%) SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. Page 105 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Report Date: October 4, 2021 Company: Address: Contact: Project: ---Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Tailings Characterization Cell 4B 554861005 -------------- Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC ------------- Column headers are defined as follows : DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit Le/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit RL MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit ' Page 106 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Project: Client ID: DNMI00107 DNMIO0l Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Report Date: September 24, 2021 Parameter Company: Address: Contact: Project: Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Tailings Characterization Cell4B 554861005 Water 0l-SEP-21 09:45 03-SEP-21 Client ----- Qualifier Result DL RL -------------------Hazardous Waste ASTM D 5057 Specific Gravity "As Received" Specific Gravity 1.25 0.0100 0.100 The following Analytical Methods were performed: Project: Client ID: DNMI00107 DNMIO0l ------- Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method none I VHI 09/14/21 0900 2173276 --------------Method Descri tion Analyst Comments ASTMD 5057 Notes: SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. Column headers are defined as follows: DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 84 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Le/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit El'J:RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 886.886.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 11/11/21 Report Date: 10/15/21 Collection Date: 09/01/21 09:55 DateReceived: 09/03/21 Matrix: Aqueous Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Project: Annual Tailings 2021 Lab ID: C21090172-006 Client Sample ID: Cell 48 LOS MCL/ Analyses Result Units Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date / By MAJOR IONS Carbonate as CO3 ND mg/L 5 A2320 B 09/07/21 14:05 / kjp Bicarbonate as HCO3 ND mg/L 5 A2320 B 09/07/21 14:05 / kjp Chloride 9180 mg/L D 50 E300.0 09/08/21 19:29 / dmb Fluoride 1870 mg/L D 50 A4500-F C 09/14/21 11 :01 / dmb Sulfate 99000 mg/L D 200 E300.0 09/08/21 19:29 / dmb Calcium 526 mg/L D 6 E200.7 09/16/21 13:46 / jcg Magnesium 4850 mg/L E200.7 09/16/21 13:46 / jcg Potassium 1240 mg/L D 6 E200.7 09/16/21 13:46 / jcg Sodium 12200 mg/L D 10 E200.7 09/16/21 13:46 / jcg PHYSICAL PROPERTIES Conductivity@ 25 C 78000 umhos/cm E 5 A2510 B 09/07/21 13:33 / kjp pH 2.0 s.u. H 0.1 A4500-H B 09/07/21 13:33 / kjp pH Measurement Temp 17.3 oc A4500-H B 09/07/21 13:33 / kjp Solids, Total Dissolved TDS@ 180 C 132000 mg/L D 1000 A2540 C 09/07/21 13:54 / kjp NUTRIENTS Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 67.5 mg/L D 0.2 E353.2 09/13/21 14:52 / nts Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 4280 mg/L D 200 E350.1 09/11/21 13:08 / dmb METALS, DISSOLVED Arsenic 74800 ug/L D 600 E200.7 09/16/21 13:46 / jcg Beryllium 318 ug/L D 20 E200.7 09/16/21 13:46 / jcg Cadmium 2140 ug/L D 600 E200.7 09/16/21 13:46 / jcg Chromium 8980 ug/L D 10 E200.8 09/26/21 08:01 I jcg Cobalt 60300 ug/L D 100 E200.8 09/28/21 10:35 / srm Copper 423000 ug/L D 600 E200.7 09/16/21 13:46 / jcg Iron 3660000 ug/L D 500 E200.8 09/26/21 08:01 I jcg Lead 1860 ug/L D 10 E200.8 09/26/21 08:01 / jcg Manganese 213000 ug/L D 30 E200.7 09/16/21 13:46 / jcg Mercury ND mg/L 0.0002 E245.1 09/17/21 19:03 / etad Molybdenum 14300 ug/L D 600 E200.7 09/16/21 13:46 / jcg Nickel 52000 ug/L D 30 E200.8 09/26/21 08:01 / jcg Selenium 3870 ug/L D 600 E200.7 09/16/21 13:46 / jcg Silver 142 ug/L D 4 E200.8 09/26/21 08:01 / jcg Thallium 123 ug/L D 10 E200.8 11 /08/21 12:22 I srm Tin 141 ug/L 50 E200.8 09/26/21 08:01 / jcg Uranium 29400 ug/L D 10 E200.8 09/26/21 08:01 I jcg Vanadium 683000 ug/L D 600 E200.7 09/16/21 13:46 / jcg Zinc 244000 ug/L D 600 E200.7 09/16/21 13:46 / jcg DATA QUALITY Solids, Total Dissolved -Calculated 129000 mg/L 1.00 A1030 E 09/17/21 14:17 / jlw A/C Balance -5.35 % A1030 E 09/17/21 14:17 / jlw Report RL -Analyte Reporting Limit MCL -Maximum Contaminant Level Definitions: QCL -Quality Control Limit ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) D -Reporting Limit (RL) increased due to sample matrix E -Estimated value -result exceeds the instrument upper quanlitalion limit H -Analysis performed past the method holding lime Page 14 of 56 EN:RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com Blllln11s, MT 800.7311.4489 • Casper, WY 188.235.0515 GIiiette, WY 888.888.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 11/11/21 Report Date: 10/15/21 Collection Date: 09/01/21 09:55 OateReceived: 09/03/21 Matrix: Aqueous Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Project: Annual Tailings 2021 Lab ID: C21090172-006 Client Sample ID: Cell 48 LOS Analyses DATA QUALITY Anions Cations Report Definitions: RL -Analyte Reporting Limit QCL -Quality Control Limit Result Units 2420 meq/L 2180 meq/L MCL/ Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date / By A1030 E 09/17/21 14:17 / jlw A1030 E 09/17/21 14:17 / jlw MCL -Maximum Contaminant Level ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) Page 15 of 56 GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Address : 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Report Date: November I, 202 I Contact: Project: Tailings Characterization Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector: ----- •aram~ter .Q~lilk_r _Result r'olatile Organics 1W846 8260 Volatiles "As Received" 2-Butanone Acetone Benzene Carbon tetrachloride Chloroform Chloromethane Methylene chloride Naphthalene Tetrahydrofuran Toluene Xylenes (total) u u u u u u u u u u u Surrogate/Tracer recovery Bromofluorobenzene Toluene-d8 l ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Result Cell 4B LDS 554861006 Water 0l-SEP-21 09:55 03-SEP-21 Client DL 8.34 8.72 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 2.50 1.67 8.34 1.67 5.00 247 ug/L 274 ug/L 278 ug/L Nominal 50.0 50.0 50.0 Proiect: DNMI00107 Client ID: DNMIO0 l RL nits ~P~F ___ DF _An_.'!!yst Date Time Batch Melhod 25.0 ug/L 5 JEB 09/08/21 1912 2171666 25.0 ug/L 5 5.00 ug/L 5 5.00 ug/L 5 5.00 ug/L 5 5.00 ug/L 5 25.0 ug/L 5 5.00 ug/L 5 25.0 ug/L 5 5.00 ug/L 5 15.0 ug/L 5 Recovery% Acceptable Limits Date Time: 09/08/21 19 12 99 (72%-125%) 109 (75%-123%) 111 (73%-129%) Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) CAS No. No Tentatively Identified Compounds Found RT Est. Concentration Fit Qua/ Date Time: 09/08/2119 12 The following Analytical Methods were erform_ed _____________________________ _ Method Description Analyst Comments SW846 8260D SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. Notes: Column headers are defined as follows: DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 25 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Le/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Address : 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Report Date: September 24, 2021 Contact: Project: Tailings Characterization --------- Client Sample ID: Cell 4B LDS Proiect: DNMI00107 Sample ID: 554861006 Client ID: DNMIOOI Matrix: Water Collect Date: 0 I-SEP-21 09:55 Receive Date: 03-SEP-21 Collector: Client -------- - •arameter Qualifier Resu lt DL RL Units PF DF Time Batch Method ,em i-Volatile-GC/MS ,W846 3510C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) "As Received" 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 NM! 09/09/21 2158 2171562 1,2-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1;2-Diphenylhydrazine u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1,3-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1,4-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1-Methy ]naphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 2,4-Dichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 2,4-Dimethylphenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 2,4-Dinitrophenol u ND 50.0 200 ug/L 0.0100 2,4-Dinitrotoluene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 2,6-Dinitrotoluene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 2-Chloronaphthalene u ND 4.10 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 2-Chlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 2-Methyl-4,6-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 dinitrophenol 2-Methylnaphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 2-Nitrophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine u ND 33.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 4-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Bromophenylphenylethe r 4-Chloro-3-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 methylphenol 4-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Chlorophenylphenylethe r 4-Nitrophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Acenaphthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Acenaphthylene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Benzi dine u ND 39.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Benzo( a )anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Benzo( a)pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Benzo(b )fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Page 54 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Address: 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: September 24, 2021 Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel Project: Tailings Characterization --- Client Sample ID: Cell4B LDS Proiect: DNMI00107 Sample ID: 554861006 Client ID: DNMIOOI >arameter ualifier Result DL R_L_ _l1_!l it_s _P_F __ DF Anal st Date Time Bat~h Method ,em i-Volatile-GC/MS 1W846 3510C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) "As Received" Benzo(ghi)perylene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Benzo(k)fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Butylbenzylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 Chrysene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Di-n-butylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 Di-n-octylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 Dibenzo( a,h )anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Diethy lphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 Dimethylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 Dipheny !amine u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Fluorene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Hexachlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Hexachlorobutadiene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Hexachlorocyclopentadi u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 ene Hexachloroethane u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 lsophorone u ND 35.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 N-Methyl-N-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 nitrosomethy !amine N-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Nitrosodipropylamine Naphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Nitro benzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Pentachlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Phenanthrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Phenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Pyridine u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 bis(2-Chloro-1-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 methylethyl)ether bis(2-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Chloroethoxy)methane bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 bis(2-43.1 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Ethy lhexy I )phthalate m,p-Cresols u ND 37.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 o-Cresol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Page 55 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Address : 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Report Date: September 24, 2021 Contact: Project: Tailings Characterization Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Cell 4B LDS 554861006 Proiect: DNMIO0I07 Client ID: DNMIO0 1 -------- >ammeter ualifier Re ul~t ___ _ D~L=--------'R=L~ __ Units PF D_.E... ~nalyst Date Time Bntch 1ethod ,em i-Volatile-GC/MS ,W846 35J0C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) ''As Received" Surrogatellracer recovery p-Terpheny 1-d 14 Phenol-d5 Nitrobenzene-d5 2-Fluorobiphenyl 2-Fluorophenol 2,4,6-Tribromophenol Result 204 ug/L 299 ug/L 311 ug/L 325 ug/L 375 ug/L 790 ug/L Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) CAS No. No Tentatively Identified Compounds Found Nominal 500 1000 500 500 1000 1000 RT Recovery% Acceptable Limits 41 (24%-129%) 30 (15%-85%) 62 (39%-112%) 65 (39%-112%) 37 (11%-79%) 79 (37%-132%) Est. Concentration Fit Qual The following Prep Methods were erfor_m_e_d ________ _ Method Description Analyst Date Time SW846 3510C 3510C BNA Liq. Prep-8270 Analysis SG2 09/08/21 1228 The followin Anal tical Methods were erformed Method Description Analyst Comments SW846 3510C/8270D Date Time: 09/09121 21 58 Date Time: 09/09/2121 58 Prep Batch 2171561 SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. Notes: Column headers are defined as follows: DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 56 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Le/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Report Date: October 4, 2021 Company : Address: Contact: Project: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Tailings Characterization ~-------------~ ------ Parameter Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector: Cell 4B LDS 554861006 Water 01-SEP-21 09:55 03-SEP-21 Client Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC ---High Rad Testing Alphaspec Th, Liquid "As Received" Thorium-228 803 +/-76.3 Thorium-230 4.52E+05 +/-1770 Thorium-232 3110 +/-147 GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received" Gross Radium Alpha 1.05E+05 +/-510 Lucas Cell, Ra226, liquid "As Received" Radium-226 174 +/-19.3 U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 "As Received" Uranium-233/234 10700 +/-304 Uranium-235/236 631 +/-83.3 Uranium-238 11400 +/-314 The following Prep Methods were performed: Method Description GL-RAD-A-026 Laboratory Compo ite The following Analytical Methods were performed: ----Method Descri tion 2 3 DOE EML HASL-300, Th-0 !-RC Modified EPA 903.0 EPA 903.1 Modified 4 DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified 52.6 79.7 43.7 24.8 24.1 89.0 65 .0 66.7 RL 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Analyst Project: Client ID: DNMI00107 DNMIO0I Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method pCi/L TC! 09/25/21 1004 2177500 pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L TC I 09/28/21 0932 2177508 2 pCi/L LXP! 10/03/21 0722 2177509 3 pCi/L TC I 09/28/21 0926 2178805 4 pCi/L pCi/L Date Time Prep Batch 2171222 Anal stComme=nt=s ___________ _ Result Nominal Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Test Recovery% Acceptable Limits ---------------------~---~----Thorium-229 Tracer Barium Carrier Uranium-232 Tracer Notes: Alphas p e c Th, Liquid "As Received" 105 (15%-125%) GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received" 94.8 (25%-125%) U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 "As Received" 85.7 (15%-125%) Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (I-sigma). SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. Page 107 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Company: Address: Contact: Project: Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Certificate of Analysis Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Tailings Characterization ---------------Cell4B LDS 554861006 Report Date: October 4, 2021 -------Project: Client ID: DNMIO0I07 DNMIO0I Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC RL Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method Column headers are defined a follows: DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 108 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl ------- Le/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Report Date: September 24, 2021 Company: Address : Contact: Project: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Tailings Characterization --------------------------------Client Sample ID: Cell4B LOS Sample ID: 554861006 Matrix: Water Collect Date: 0l-SEP-21 09:55 Receive Date: 03-SEP-21 Collector: Client Parameter DL RL Qualifier Result _________ .c_ ------------ Hazardous Waste ASTM D 5057 Specific Gravity "As Received" Specific Gravity I.I 0 The following Analytical Methods were performed: Method Descri tion ASTM D 5057 Notes: 0.0100 0.100 Project: DNMIO0 l 07 Client ID: DNMIO0 I Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method ---- none I VHI 09/14/21 0902 2173276 Anal st Comments SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. Column headers are defined as follows: DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 85 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Le/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit EN:RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 868.888.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 11/11/21 Report Date: 10/15/21 Collection Date: 09/01/21 08:10 DateReceived: 09/03/21 Matrix: Aqueous Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Project: Annual Tailings 2021 Lab ID: C21090172-007 Client Sample ID: Cell 65 MCL/ Analyses Result Units Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date I By MAJOR IONS Carbonate as CO3 ND mg/L 5 A2320 B 09/07/21 14:08 / kjp Bicarbonate as HCO3 ND mg/L 5 A2320 B 09/07/21 14:08 / kjp Chloride 67900 mg/L D 200 E300.0 09/09/21 22:03 I dmb Fluoride 12700 mg/L D 200 A4500-F C 09/14/21 14:04 / dmb Sulfate 323000 mg/L D 800 E300.0 09/09/21 22:03 I dmb Calcium 211 mg/L D 6 E200.7 09/16/21 13:50 I jcg Magnesium 17500 mg/L E200.7 09/16/21 13:50 I jcg Potassium 3530 mg/L D 6 E200.7 09/16/21 13:50 I jcg Sodium 70000 mg/L D 30 E200.8 09/26/21 08:06 I jcg PHYSICAL PROPERTIES Conductivity @ 25 C 86800 umhos/cm E 5 A2510 B 09/07/21 13:36 / kjp pH 0.5 s.u. H 0.1 A4500-H B 09/07/21 13:36 / kjp pH Measurement Temp 17.9 oc A4500-H B 09/07/21 13:36 / kjp Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 553000 mg/L DE 2000 A2540 C 09/07/21 13:54 / kjp Solids, Total Dissolved TDS@ 180 C 560000 mg/L DH 5000 A2540 C 09/08/21 15:59 / kjp -E -TDS residue exceeded the 200 mg limit per method. The sample was re-analyzed with a lower volume to obtain a valid result. The E qualifed data is reported at client request. -H -Original analysis was done within hold time. Data is from recheck analysis, NUTRIENTS Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 26.6 mg/L D 0.5 E353.2 09/13/21 14:53 / nts Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 6800 mg/L D 200 E350.1 09/11 /21 13:09 / dmb METALS, DISSOLVED Arsenic 778000 ug/L D 2000 E200.7 09/21/21 05:25 / jcg Beryllium 2820 ug/L D 20 E200.7 09/16/21 13:50 I jcg Cadmium 20900 ug/L D 600 E200.7 09/16/21 13:50 I jcg Chromium 25300 ug/L D 600 E200.7 09/16/21 13:50 I jcg Cobalt 46500 ug/L D 2000 E200.7 09/21/21 05:25 / jcg Copper 2850000 ug/L D 2000 E200.7 09/21/21 05:25 / jcg Iron 6790000 ug/L D 500 E200.8 09/26/21 08:06 / jcg Lead 68500 ug/L D 2000 E200.7 09/16/21 13:50 I jcg Manganese 1250000 ug/L D 30 E200.7 09/16/21 13:50 I jcg Mercury 0.030 mg/L 0.001 E245.1 09/17/21 19:06 / etad Molybdenum 311000 ug/L D 600 E200.7 09/16/21 13:50 I jcg Nickel 17300 ug/L D 1000 E200.7 09/24/21 15:33 I jcg Selenium 16300 ug/L D 600 E200.7 09/22/21 02:29 I jcg Silver 2300 ug/L D 4 E200.8 09/26/21 08:06 / jcg Thallium 2190 ug/L D 1000 E200.8 09/28/21 10:50 I srm Tin 1690 ug/L 50 E200.8 09/26/21 08:06 / jcg Uranium 479000 ug/L D 100 E200.8 10/11/2115:17 / srm Vanadium 3560000 ug/L D 600 E200.7 09/16/21 13:50 I jcg Zinc 755000 ug/L D 600 E200.7 09/16/21 13:50 I jcg Report RL -Analyte Reporting Limit MCL -Maximum Contaminant Level Definitions: QCL -Quality Control Limit ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) D -Reporting Limit (RL) increased due to sample matrix E -Estimated value -result exceeds the instrument upper quantitation limit H -Analysis performed past the method holding time Page 16 of 56 EI\ERGY Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 888.888.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 11/11/21 Report Date: 10/15/21 Collection Date: 09/01/21 08:10 DateReceived: 09/03/21 Matrix: Aqueous Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Project: Annual Tailings 2021 Lab ID: C21090172-007 Client Sample ID: Cell 65 Analyses DATA QUALITY Solids, Total Dissolved -Calculated NC Balance Anions Cations Cation/Anion Balance includes selected metals Report Definitions: RL -Analyte Reporting Limit QCL -Quality Control Limit Result Units 495000 mg/L -5.82 % 9320 meq/L 8290 meq/L Qualifiers MCL/ RL QCL Method 1.00 A1030 E A1030 E A1030 E A1030 E MCL -Maximum Contaminant Level Analysis Date / By 09/27/21 13:53 / jlw 09/27/21 13:53 / jlw 09/27/21 13:53 / jlw 09/27/21 13:53 / jlw ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) Page 17 of 56 GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Address : 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Report Date: November I, 2021 Contact: Project: Tailings Characterization Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector: Cell 65 554861007 Water 0 l-SEP-21 08: IO 03-SEP-21 Client Proiect: DNMI00107 Client ID: DNMIO0I _,,•a"'-r=am=et=e"---r ____ _,.,_=ua=l=ifier Result DL ~---RL _ ~ni~L_ PF DF Anal st Date Time ~!!!~h Method r'olatile Organics iW846 8260 Volatiles ''As Received" 2-Butanone u Acetone Benzene u Carbon tetrachloride u Chloroform Chloromethane u Methylene chloride u Naphthalene u Tetrahydrofuran u Toluene u Xylenes (total) u Surrogate/Tracer recovery Bromofluorobenzene Toluene-d8 l ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 ND 154 ND ND 52.8 ND ND ND ND ND ND Result 248 ug/L 269 ug/L 321 ug/L Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) CAS No. No Tentatively Identified Compounds Found 8.34 8.72 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 2.50 1.67 8.34 1.67 5.00 Nominal 50:0 50.0 50.0 RT 25.0 ug/L 25.0 ug/L 5.00 ug/L 5.00 ug/L 5.00 ug/L 5.00 ug/L 25.0 ug/L 5.00 ug/L 25.0 ug/L 5.00 ug/L 15.0 ug/L Recovery% Acceptable Limits 99 (72%-125%) 108 (75%-123%) 128 (73%-129%) Est. Concentration Fit 5 JEB 09/08/21 1937 2171666 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Date Time: 09/08/21 19 37 Qua/ Date Time: 09/08/21 19 37 The followi'!_g Analytical Methods ~p,~e_r_fo_r_m_e_d _______________________________ _ Method Description Analyst Comments ---------------------------------------SW846 8260D SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. Notes: Column headers are defmed as follows: DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 26 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Le/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Address: 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: September 24, 2021 Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel Project: Tailings Characterization ---- Client Sample ID: Cell 65 Proiect: DNMI00107 Sample ID: 554861007 Client ID: DNMIOOI Matrix: Water Collect Date: OI-SEP-21 08:10 Receive Date: 03-SEP-21 Collector: Client ---- 'arameter u.alifier Result DL RL __ Units PF __ DF Anal st Date Time Batch Method ;em i-V o latile-GC/MS ,W846 35J0C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) "As Received" 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 NM! 09/09/21 2226 2171562 1,2-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1,3-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1,4-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1-Methy I naphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 2,4-Dichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 2,4-Dimethylphenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 2,4-Dinitrophenol u ND 50.0 200 ug/L 0.0100 2,4-Dinitrotoluene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 2,6-Dinitrotoluene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 2-Chloronaphthalene u ND 4.10 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 2-Chlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 2-Methyl-4,6-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 dinitrophenol 2-Methylnaphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 2-Nitrophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine u ND 33.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 4-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Bromophenylphenylethe r 4-Chloro-3-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 methylphenol 4-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Chlorophenylphenylethe r 4-Nitrophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Acenaphthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Acenaphthylene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Benzidine u ND 39.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Benzo(a)anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Benzo( a)pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Benzo(b )fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Page 57 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Address: 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: September 24, 2021 Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel Project: Tailings Characterization Client Sample ID: Cell 65 Proiect: DNMI00107 Sample ID: 554861007 Client ID: DNMIOOI ---- •arameter ualifier Result DL RL Units PF DF Anal)'.'.St Da!L Tl!!Je Batch Method ,emi-Volatile-GC/MS ,W846 35J0C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) ''As Received" Benzo(ghi)perylene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 l Benzo(k)fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 1 B uty lbenzy lphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 l Chrysene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 I Di-n-butylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 l Di-n-octylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 l Dibenzo( a,h )anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 1 Diethy lphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 l Dimethylphthalate u ND 3.00 JOO ug/L 0.0100 l Dipheny !amine u ND 30.0 JOO ug/L 0.0100 l Fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 l Fluorene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 I Hexachlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1 Hexachlorobutadiene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 l Hexachlorocyclopentadi u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1 ene Hexachloroethane u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 lndeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Isophorone u ND 35.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 N-Methyl-N-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 nitrosomethy !amine N-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Nitrosodipropylamine Naphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Nitro benzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Pentachlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Phenanthrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Phenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Pyridine 164 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 bis(2-Chloro-l-u ND 30.0 JOO ug/L 0.0100 methylethyl)ether bis(2-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Chloroethoxy )methane bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 bis(2-u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 Ethylhexyl)phthalate m,p-Cresols u ND 37.0 JOO ug/L 0.0100 o-Cresol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 Page 58 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Address : 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Report Date: September 24, 2021 Contact: Project: Tailings Characterization Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Cell 65 554861007 Proiect: DNMIO0 I 07 Client ID: DNMIO0I >arameter ualitier Result DL Units PF __ D_F Analyst Date Time Batch Method ,em i-Volatile-GC/MS ,W846 3510C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) "As Received" Surrogate/Tracer recovery Result Nominal p-Terphenyl-dl4 279 ug/L Nitrobenzene-d5 377 ug/L 2-Fluorobiphenyl 378 ug/L Phenol-d5 423 ug/L 2-Fluorophenol 501 ug/L 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 942 ug/L Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) CASNo. No Tentatively Identified Compounds Found SW846 35I0C SW846 3510C 351 QC BNA Liq. Prep-8270 Analysis 3510C BNA Liq. Prep-8270 Analysis The followin Anal tical Methods were erformed 500 500 500 1000 1000 1000 RT Recovery% Acceptable Limits 56 (24%-129%) 75 (39%-112%) 76 (39%-112%) 42 (15%-85%) 50 (11%-79%) 94 (37%-132%) Est. Concentration Fit Analyst LWI SG2 Date 09/22/21 09/08/21 Qua/ Time 1120 1228 ---------------------Method _____ Description __________________ A_n_a_ly_s_t_c_omments SW846 3510C/8270D Date Time: 09/09/2122 26 Date Time: 09/09/2122 26 Prep Batch -------2176674 2171561 SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. Notes: Column headers are defined as follows: DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 59 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Le/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Company: Address: Certificate of Analysis Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel Project: Tailings Characterization ------------------------- Report Date: October 4, 2021 Client Sample ID: Cell 65 Project: DNMI00107 DNMIO0l Sample ID: 554861007 Client ID: Matrix: Water Collect Date: 0l-SEP-21 08:10 Receive Date: 03-SEP-2 l Collector: Client Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC RL Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method ---- High Rad Testing Alphaspec Th, Liquid "As Received" Thorium-228 500 +/-67.9 72.7 1.00 pCi/L TC! 09/25/21 1004 2177500 Thorium-230 I.78E+05 +/-1230 92.2 1.00 pCi/L Thorium-232 946 +/-90.2 53.0 1.00 pCi/L GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received" Gross Radium Alpha 25600 +/-247 19.8 1.00 pCi/L TC\ 09/28/21 0932 2177508 2 Lucas Cell, Ra226, liquid "As Received" Radium-226 281 +/-22.9 17.5 1.00 pCi/L LXPI 10/03/21 0722 2177509 3 U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 "As Received" Uranium-233/234 2.12E+05 +/-4470 1160 1.00 pCi/L TC! 09/28/21 0926 2178805 4 Uranium-235/236 10300 +/-1100 706 1.00 pCi/L Uranium-238 2.23E+05 +/-4570 837 1.00 pCi/L The following Prep Methods were performed: Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch GL-RAD-A-026 Laboratory Composite 2171222 The following Analytical Methods were performed: ------~----------Method Descri tion Analyst Comments DOE EML HASL-300, Th-01-RC Modified 2 EPA 903.0 3 EPA 903.1 Modified 4 DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Test Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits ------------------------------'------'------Thorium-229 Tracer Barium Carrier Uranium-232 Tracer Notes: Alphaspec Th, Liquid "As Received" GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received" U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 "As Received" Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (I-sigma). 84. 9 (15%-125%) 94.1 (25%-125%) 76.4 (15%-125%) SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. Page 109 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Report Date: October 4, 2021 Company: Address : Contact: Project: ----Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Tailings Characterization Cell 65 554861007 Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty -----'--MDC Column headers are defined as follows: DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit Le/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit RL MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Page 110 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Project: Client ID: DNMI00107 DNMIO0I Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Report Date: September 24, 2021 Company: Address: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. 225 Union Boulevard Parameter Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel Project: Tailings Characterization ----Client Sample ID: Cell 65 Sample ID: 554861007 Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Water 0l-SEP-21 08:10 03-SEP-21 Client Collector: Qualifier Result Hazardous Waste ASTM D 5057 Specific Gravity "As Received" Specific Gravity 1.33 The following Analytical Methods were performed: ---- DL 0.0100 Method __ D"'"-'-es'-"c-'--riJO.c...li-"-011'""" ____________ _ ASTMD 5057 Notes: Project: Client ID: DNMI00107 DNMIO0I RL Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method ------ 0.100 none I VHI 09/14/21 0903 2173276 Analyst Comments ________ _ SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. Column headers are defined as follows: DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 86 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Le/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Address : 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Contact: Project: (olatile Organics Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Ms. Kathy Weinel Tailings Characterization Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector: Trip Blank 554861009 Water 01-SEP-21 08:10 03-SEP-21 Client DL 1W846 8260 Volatiles "As Received" 2-Butanone u ND 1.67 Acetone u ND 1.74 Benzene u ND 0.333 Carbon tetrachloride u ND 0.333 Chloroform u ND 0.333 Chloromethane u ND 0.333 Methylene chloride u ND 0.500 Naphthalene u ND 0.333 Tetrahydrofuran u ND l.67 Toluene u ND 0.333 Xylenes (total) u ND 1.00 Surrogate/Tracer recovery Result Nominal Bromofluorobenzene 48.5 ug/L 50.0 Toluene-d8 53.7 ug/L 50.0 l ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 55.2 ug/L 50.0 The followin Anal tical Methods were erformed Method Description ---SW846 82600 Report Date: November I, 2021 Proiect: DNMI00107 Client ID: DNMI00I RL Units PF'-• ---=D-=-F__,=n=a=l,~_l_Pate Time Batch Mctho~ 5.00 ug/L 1 JEB 09/08/21 1440 2171666 5.00 ug/L 1 1.00 ug/L l 1.00 ug/L l 1.00 ug/L l 1.00 ug/L I 5.00 ug/L l 1.00 ug/L 1 5.00 ug/L l 1.00 ug/L l 3.00 ug/L l Recovery% Acceptable Limits Date Time: 09/08/2114 40 97 (72%-125%) 107 (75%-123%) llO (73%-129%) Analyst Comments SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. Notes: Column headers are defined as follows: DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 28 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Le/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit EI\ERGY Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com Billings, MT 800. 735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 866.686.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 ANALYTICAL SUMMARY REPORT November 11, 2021 Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc 44 Union Blvd Ste 600 Lakewood, CO 80228-1826 Work Order: C21090172 Project Name: Annual Tailings 2021 Quote ID: C5645 Energy Laboratories, Inc. Casper WY received the following 8 samples for Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc on 9/3/2021 for analysis. Lab ID Client Sample ID C21090172-001 Cell 1 C21090172-002 Slimes #2 C21090172-003 Cell4A C21090172-004 Cell 4A LOS C21090172-005 Cell48 C21090172-006 Cell 4B LOS C21090172-007 Cell 65 C21090172-008 Cell 3 Collect Date Receive Date Matrix Test 09/01/21 8:10 09/03/21 09/01/21 8:35 09/03/21 09/01/21 9:20 09/03/21 09/01/21 9:35 09/03/21 09/01/21 9:45 09/03/21 09/01/21 9:55 09/03/21 09/01/21 8:10 09/03/21 09/01/21 9:05 09/03/21 Aqueous Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved Acidity, Total as CaC03 Alkalinity Aqueous Aqueous Aqueous Aqueous Aqueous Aqueous Aqueous Anion -Cation Balance Conductivity Mercury, Dissolved Extra Bottle Fluoride Anions by Ion Chromatography Nitrogen, Ammonia Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite pH Sample Filtering, Metals Digestion, Mercury by CVM Solids, Total Dissolved Solids, Total Dissolved -Calculated Same As Above Same As Above Same As Above Same As Above Same As Above Same As Above Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved Alkalinity Anion -Cation Balance Conductivity Mercury, Dissolved Extra Bottle Fluoride Anions by Ion Chromatography Nitrogen, Ammonia Nitrogen, Nitrate+ Nitrite pH Sample Filtering, Metals Digestion, Mercury by CVM Solids, Total Dissolved Solids, Total Dissolved -Calculated The analyses presented in this report were performed by Energy Laboratories, Inc., 2393 Salt Creek Hwy., Casper, WY 82601 , unless otherwise noted. Any exceptions or problems with the analyses are noted in the report package. Any issues encountered during sample receipt are documented in the Work Order Receipt Checklist. Page 1 of 56 EI\ERGY Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 888.686.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 ANALYTICAL SUMMARY REPORT The results as reported relate only to the item(s) submitted for testing. This report shall be used or copied only in its entirety. Energy Laboratories, Inc. is not responsible for the consequences arising from the use of a partial report. If you have any questions regarding these test results, please contact your Project Manager . Report Approved By: Digitally signed by Alyson T. Degnan Date: 2021.11.11 10:52:44 -07:00 Page 2 of 56 EN:RGY ~~ Trust our People. Trust our Data. ~ www.energylab.com Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 888.688.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 ========= CLIENT: Project: Work Order: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Annual Tailings 2021 C21090172 Revised 11/11/2021 Revised Date: 11/11/21 Report Date: 10/15/21 CASE NARRATIVE This report has been revised to include lower reporting limits for lead and thallium for sample Cell 1 (C21090172-001), thallium for sample Cell 4A (C21090172-003), thallium for sample Cell 4A LOS (C21090172-004), thallium for sample Cell 8 (C21090172-008). This revised report replaces any previously issued report on 10/29/2021 in its entirety. Revised 10/29/2021 This report has been revised to include Total Dissolved Solids for samples Cell 1 (C21090172-001), Cell 4B (C21090172- 005), and Cell 65 (C21090172-007) as per telephone request from Kathy Weinel on 10/29/2021. Please see results pages for more information. Tests associated with analyst identified as "etad" were subcontracted to Eurofins Test America, 4955 Yarrow St, Arvada, CO 80002, TEL (303) 736-0100. Please see attached data packet for details. ORIGINAL SAMPLE SUBMITTAL(S) All original sample submittals have been returned with the data package. SAMPLE TEMPERATURE COMPLIANCE: 4°C (±2°C) Temperature of samples received may not be considered properly preserved by accepted standards. Samples that are hand delivered immediately after collection shall be considered acceptable if there is evidence that the chilling process has begun. GROSS ALPHA ANALYSIS Method 900.0 for gross alpha and gross beta is intended as a drinking water method for low TDS waters. Data provided by this method for non potable waters should be viewed as inconsistent. RADON IN AIR ANALYSIS The desired exposure time is 48 hours (2 days). The time delay in returning the canister to the laboratory for processing should be as short as possible to avoid excessive decay. Maximum recommended delay between end of exposure to beginning of counting should not exceed 8 days. SOIL/SOLID SAMPLES All samples reported on an as received basis unless otherwise indicated. ATRAZINE, SIMAZINE AND PCB ANALYSIS Data for PCBs, Atrazine and Simazine are reported from EPA 525.2. PCB data reported by ELI reflects the results for seven individual Aroclors. When the results for all seven are ND (not detected), the sample meets EPA compliance criteria for PCB monitoring. SUBCONTRACTING ANALYSIS Subcontracting of sample analyses to an outside laboratory may be required. If so, ENERGY LABORATORIES will utilize its branch laboratories or qualified contract laboratories for this service. Any such laboratories will be indicated within the Laboratory Analytical Report. BRANCH LABORATORY LOCATIONS eli-b -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Billings, MT eli-g -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Gillette, WY eli-h -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Helena, MT ISO 17025 DISCLAIMER: The results of this Analytical Report relate only to the items submitted for analysis. ENERGY LABORATORIES, INC. -CASPER,WY certifies that certain method selections contained in this report meet requirements as set forth by the above accrediting authorities. Some results requested by the client may not be covered under these certifications. All analysis data to be submitted for regulatory enforcement should be certified in the sample state of origin. Please verify ELi's certification coverage by visiting www.energylab.com ELI appreciates the opportunity to provide you with this analytical service. For additional information and services visit our web page Page 3 of 56 . .,. ........... LINKS .......... .. r r Review ¥our project results through TotdAccess l!lave a Question? ~ k Th e Ex ert 1 V1slt us at: www.euroflnsus.com1env =:~ eurofins Environment Testing America ANALYTICAL REPORT Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver 4955 Yarrow Street Arvada, CO 80002 Tel: (303)736-0100 Laboratory Job ID: 280-152688-1 Client Project/Site: 11 (e) Byproduct Material For: Energy Laboratories, Inc. 400 W Boxelder Rd Gillette, Wyoming 82718 Attn: Casper Reporting /£-4-✓-- Authorized for release by: 9/2012021 8:12:36 AM Dylan Bieniulis, Project Manager I (303)736-0138 Dylan.Bieniulis@Eurofinset.com The test results in this report meet a/12003 NELAC, 2009 TNf, end 2016 TNf requirements for accredited parameters, exceptions are noted in this report. This report may not be reproduced except in full, end with written approval from the laboratory. For questions please contact the Project Manager at Ille e-mail address or telephone number listed on this page. This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signature is intended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature. Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory. Page 20 of 56 I Client Energy Laboratories, Inc. Project/Site: 11 (e) Byproduct Material Table of Contents Laboratory Job ID: 280-152688-1 Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Detection Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Client Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 QC Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 QC Association . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 o Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Certification Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Receipt Checklists . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Page 2 of 15 Eurofins TestAmeri~~nver PagBU2~1 I Definitions/Glossary Client: Energy Laboratories, Inc. Project/Site: 11(e) Byproduct Material Qualifiers Metals Qualifier Glossary Abbreviation D ¾R CFL CFU CNF DER Oil Fae DL DL, RA, RE, IN DLC EDL LOO LOQ MCL MDA MDC MDL ML MPN MQL NC ND NEG POS PQL PRES QC RER RL RPO TEF TEQ TNTC Qualifier Description Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value. These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report. ----Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis Percent Recovery Contains Free Liquid Colony Forming Unit Contains No Free Liquid Duplicate Error Ratio (normalized absolute difference) Dilution Factor Detection Limit (DoD/DOE) Indicates a Dilution, Re-analysis, Re-extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample Decision Level Concentration (Radiochemistry) Estimated Detection Limit (Dioxin) Limit of Detection (DoD/DOE) Limit of Quantitation (DoD/DOE) EPA recommended "Maximum Contaminant Level" Minimum Detectable Activity (Radiochemistry) Minimum Detectable Concentration (Radiochemistry) Method Detection Limit Minimum Level (Dioxin) Most Probable Number Method Quantitation Limit Not Calculated Not Detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown) Negative I Absent Positive / Present Practical Quantitation Limit Presumptive Quality Control Relative Error Ratio (Radiochemistry) Reporting Limit or Requested Limit (Radiochemistry) Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin) Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin) Too Numerous To Count Page 3 of 15 Job ID: 280-152688-1 I I Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver Page 25UilWQ021 Client: Energy Laboratories, Inc. ProjecUSite: 11 (e) Byproduct Material Job ID: 280-152688-1 Laboratory: Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver Narrative Receipt Case Narrative Job Narrative 280-152688-1 Job ID: 280-152688-1 The samples were received on 9/8/2021 9:40 AM. Unless otherwise noted below, the samples arrived in good condition, and, where required, properly preserved and on ice. The temperature of the cooler at receipt time was 5.3°C Receipt Exceptions All sample containers for the samples listed on the chain of custody were only approximately 25% full. No corrective action needed as sufficient volume was received to perform the requested analyses. Metals No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/ Glossary page. Page 4 of 15 Eurofins TestAmeric~ Denver Page 29AllWQ021 I Detection Summary Client: Energy Laboratories, Inc. Project/Site: 11(e) Byproduct Material ------- Client SamplE:_J!): C21090172-001 D Analyte Mercury Result Qualifier ---35 Client Sample ID: C21090172-002D --- Analyte Result Qualifier ----Mercury 0.079 J Client Sample ID: C21090172-003D Analyte Result Qualifier ---Mercury 3.7 --- RL 1.0 RL MDL Unit ---0 14 ug/L MDL Unit 0.20 0.027 ug/L RL MDL Unit 0.20 0,027 ug/L Job ID: 280-152688-1 Lab Sample ID: 280-152688-1 Dil Fae D Method ----1 245.1 Prep Type Dissolved Lab Sample ID: 280-152688-2 I Dil Fae D Method ----1 245.1 Prep Type Dissolved Lab Sample ID: 280-152688-3 DII Fae D Method Prep Type -----1 245.1 Dissolved ------Lab Sample ID: 280-152688-4 Clie_nt Sample ID: C21090172-004D --------- Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit DII Fae D Method Prep Type ------Mercury 0.32 0.20 0.027 ug/L 1 245.1 Dissolved ---------Client Sample ID: C21090172-005D Lab Sample ID: 280-152688-5 -------- Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fae D Method Prep Type --------Mercury 8,6 0.20 0.027 ug/L 1 245.1 Dissolved Client Sample ID: C21090172-006D Lab Sample ID: 280-152688-6 ----- Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fae D Method Prep Type ---Mercury 0.12 J 0.20 0,027 ug/L 1 245.1 Dissolved ---Client Sample ID: C21090172-007D Lab Sample ID: 280-152688-7 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit DII Fae D Method Prep Type ----Mercury 30 1.0 0.14 ug/L 1 245.1 Dissolved --Client Sample ID: C21090172-008D Lab Sample ID: 280-152688-8 ------------ Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fae D Method Prep Type ---------Mercury 0.19 J 1.0 0.14 ug/L 245.1 Dissolved This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results. Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver Page 5 of 15 Page 21il.6lWQ021 Client: Energy Laboratories, Inc. Project/Site: 11 (e) Byproduct Material Method 245.1 245.1 Method Description Mercury -Dissolved Preparation, Mercury Protocol References: EPA= US Environmental Protection Agency Laboratory References: Method Summary TAL DEN= Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver, 4955 Yarrow Street, Arvada, CO 80002, TEL (303)736-0100 Page 6 of 15 Protocol EPA EPA Job ID: 280-152688-1 Laboratory TAL DEN TALDEN Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver Page 2!UilW2021 I Client: Energy Laboratories, Inc. Project/Site: 11 ( e) Byproduct Material Lab Sample ID Cllent Sample ID -280-152688-1 C21090172-0010 280-152688-2 C21090172-002D 280-152688-3 C21090172-003D 280-152688-4 C21090172-004D 280-152688-5 C21090172-005D 280-152688-6 C21090172-006D 280-152688-7 C21090172-007D 280-152688-8 C21090172-008D Sample Summary Matrix Collected ---Water 09/01/21 08:10 Water 09/01 /21 08:35 Water 09/01 /21 09:20 water 09/01 /21 09:35 water 09/01 /21 09:45 Water 09/01/21 09:55 Water 09/01/21 08:10 water 09/01/21 09:05 Page 7 of 15 Received 09/08/21 09:40 09/08/21 09:40 09/08/21 09:40 09/08/21 09:40 09/08/21 09:40 09/08/21 09:40 09/08/21 09:40 09/08/21 09:40 Job ID: 280-152688-1 Eurofins TestAmeri'f~ Denver Page 2B.afGIQ021 I Client Sample Results Client: Energy Laboratories, Inc. Job ID: 280-152688-1 ProjecUSite: 11 (e) Byproduct Material ------Method: 245.1 -Mercury -Dissolved -Dissolved --- Client Sample ID: C21090172-001D Lab Sample ID: 280-152688-1 Date Collected: 09/01/21 08:10 Matrix: Water Date Received: 09/08/21 09:40 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fae Mercury 35 1.0 0.14 ug/L 09/17/21 14:40 09/17/21 18:48 Client Sample ID: C21090172-002D Lab Sample ID: 280-152688-2 Date Collected: 09/01/21 08:35 Matrix: Water Date Received: 09/08/21 09:40 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fae I ---Mercury 0.079 J 0.20 0.027 ug/L 09/17/21 14:40 09/17/21 18:52 Client Sample ID: C21090172-003D Lab Sample ID: 280-152688-3 Date Collected: 09/01/21 09:20 Matrix: Water Date Received: 09/08/21 09:40 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Oil Fae ----Mercury 3.7 0.20 0.027 ug/L 09/17/21 14:40 09/17/21 18:54 Client Sample ID: C21090172-004D Lab Sample ID: 280-152688-4 Date Collected: 09/01/21 09:35 Matrix: Water Date Received: 09/08/21 09:40 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Oil Fae Mercury 0.32 0.20 0,027 ug/L 09/17/21 14:40 09/17/21 18:57 Client Sample ID: C21090172-005D Lab Sample ID: 280-152688-5 Date Collected: 09/01/21 09:45 Matrix: Water Date Received: 09/08/21 09:40 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fae -----Mercury 8.6 0.20 0.027 ug/L 09/17/21 14:40 09/17/21 18:59 Client Sample ID: C21090172-006D Lab Sample ID: 280-152688-6 Date Collected: 09/01/21 09:55 Matrix: Water Date Received: 09/08/21 09:40 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Oil Fae ----------Mercury 0.12 J 0.20 0.027 ug/L 09/17/21 14:40 09/17/21 19:03 Client Sample ID: C21090172-007D Lab Sample ID: 280-152688-7 Date Collected: 09/01/21 08:10 Matrix: Water Date Received: 09/08/21 09:40 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fae ---Mercury 30 1.0 0,14 ug/L 09/17/21 14:40 09/17 /21 19:06 1 Client Sample ID: C21090172-008D Lab Sample ID: 280-152688-8 Date Collected: 09/01/21 09:05 Matrix: Water Date Received: 09/08/21 09:40 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Oil Fae Mercury 0.19 J 1,0 0.14 ug/L 09/17/21 14:40 09/17 /21 19:08 Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver Page 8 of 15 Page 2~A2Wl2021 QC Sample Results Client: Energy Laboratories, Inc. Job ID: 280-152688-1 ProjecUSite: 11 ( e) Byproduct Material Method: 245.1 -Mercury -Dissolved -------------------------- Lab Sample ID: MB 280-550187/1-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 550308 ' Analyte Mercury Lab Sample ID: LCS 280-550187/2-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 550308 Analyte Mercury Lab Sample ID: 280-152688-8 MS Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 550308 Analyte -----------Mercury Lab Sample ID: 280-152688-8 MSD Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 550308 Analyte Mercury MB MB Result Qualifier ND Sample Sample Result Qualifier 0.19 J Sample Sample Result Qualifier 0.19 J Spike Added 5.00 Spike Added 25.0 Spike Added 25.0 RL 0.20 MDL Unit ----0.027 ug/L LCS LCS Result Qualifier Unit Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 550187 D Prepared 09/17/21 14:40 Analyzed 09/17/21 18:38 Oil Fae Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 550187 %Rec. D %Rec Limits ----5.02 ug/L MS MS 100 90 -110 Client Sample ID: C21090172-008D Prep Type: Dissolved Prep Batch: 550187 %Rec. Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits ----24.7 ug/L 98 80 -120 MSD MSD Result Qualifier Unit Client Sample ID: C21090172-008D Prep Type: Dissolved Prep Batch: 550187 RPO D RPO Limit ------------%Rec 97 %Rec. Limits 80-120 ----24.4 ug/L 1 10 Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver Page 9 of 15 Page 29.6l~021 I QC Association Summary Client: Energy Laboratories, Inc. Job ID: 280-152688-1 Project/Site: 11(e) Byproduct Material Metals Prep Batch: 550187 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method ~epBatch 280-152688-1 C21090172-0010 Dissolved Water 245.1 280-152688-2 C21090172-0020 Dissolved Water 245.1 280-152688-3 C21090172-0030 Dissolved Water 245_1 280-152688-4 C21090172-0040 Dissolved Water 245.1 280-152688-5 C21090172-0050 Dissolved Water 245 1 280-152688-6 C21090172-0060 Dissolved Water 245.1 280-152688-7 C21090172-0070 Dissolved Water 245_1 280-152688-8 C21090172-0080 Dissolved Water 245.1 MB 280-550187/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Water 245.1 LCS 280-550187/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 245.1 280-152688-8 MS C21090172-008D Dissolved Water 245_1 280-152688-8 MSD C21090172-0080 Dissolved Water 245.1 m Analysis Batch: 550308 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method __ Prep Batch 280-152688-1 C21090172-001D Dissolved Water 245.1 550187 280-152688-2 C21090172-002D Dissolved Water 245.1 550187 280-152688-3 C21090172-0030 Dissolved Water 245.1 550187 280-152688-4 C21090172-0040 Dissolved Water 245.1 550187 280-152688-5 C21090172-0050 Dissolved Water 245.1 550187 280-152688-6 C21090172-0060 Dissolved Water 245.1 550187 280-152688-7 C21090172-0070 Dissolved Water 245.1 550187 280-152688-8 C21090172-0080 Dissolved Water 245.1 550187 MB 280-550187/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Water 245.1 550187 LCS 280-550187/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 245.1 550187 280-152688-8 MS C21090172-008D Dissolved Water 245,1 550187 280-152688-8 MSD C21090172-0080 Dissolved Water 245.1 550187 Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver Page 10 of 15 Page 29.+2~021 Lab Chronicle Client: Energy Laboratories, Inc. Job ID: 280-152688-1 ProjecUSite: 11(e) Byproduct Material ------------------Client Sample ID: C21090172-001D Lab Sample ID: 280-152688-1 Date Collected: 09/01/21 08:10 Matrix: Water Date Received: 09/08/21 09:40 ------------------- Batch Batch DU Initial Final Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab -----Dissolved Prep 245.1 6 ml 50 ml 550187 09/17/21 14:40 NK TAl DEN Dissolved Analysis 245.1 550308 09/17/21 18:48 NK TAl DEN Client Sample ID: C21090172-002D Lab Sample ID: 280-152688-2 Date Collected: 09/01/21 08:35 Matrix: Water Date Received: 09/08/21 09:40 --- Batch Batch D11 Initial Final Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab ----------Dissolved Prep 245.1 30 ml 50 ml 550187 09/17/21 14:40 NK TAl DEN Dissolved Analysis 245.1 550308 09/17/21 18:52 NK TAlDEN ---------Client Sample ID: C21090172-003D Lab Sample ID: 280-152688-3 ~ Date Collected: 09/01/21 09:20 Matrix: Water Date Received: 09/08/21 09:40 ---- Batch Batch Oil Initial Final Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Dissolved Prep 245.1 30 ml 50 ml 550187 09/17/21 14:40 NK TAl DEN Dissolved Analysis 245.1 550308 09/17/21 18:54 NK TAlDEN ----Client Sample ID: C21090172-004D Lab Sample ID: 280-152688-4 Date Collected: 09/01/21 09:35 Matrix: Water Date Received: 09/08/21 09:40 --- Batch Batch D11 Initial Final Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab ----Dissolved Prep 245.1 30 ml 50 ml 550187 09/17/21 14:40 NK TAl DEN Dissolved Analysis 245.1 550308 09/17/21 18:57 NK TAl DEN Client Sample ID: C21090172-005D Lab Sample ID: 280-152688-5 Date Collected: 09/01/21 09:45 Matrix: Water Date Received: 09/08/21 09:40 -------~- Batch Batch D11 Initial Final Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab -----------Dissolved Prep 245.1 30 ml 50 ml 550187 09/17121 14:40 NK TAl DEN Dissolved Analysis 245.1 550308 09/17/21 18:59 NK TAl DEN Client Sample ID: C21090172-006O Lab Sample ID: 280-152688-6 Date Collected: 09/01/21 09:55 Matrix: Water Date Received: 09/08/21 09:40 Batch Batch Oil Initial Final Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab ----Dissolved Prep 245.1 30 ml 50 ml 550187 09/17121 14:40 NK TAl DEN Dissolved Analysis 245.1 550308 09/17/21 19:03 NK TAl DEN Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver Page 11 of 15 Page 39/<ll1M2021 Lab Chronicle Client: Energy Laboratories, Inc. Job ID: 280-152688-1 Project/Site: 11 ( e) Byproduct Material -------- Client Sample ID: C21090172-007D Lab Sample ID: 280-152688-7 Date Collected: 09/01/21 08:10 Matrix: Water Date Received: 09/08/21 09:40 ---- Batch Batch 011 Initial Final Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab ---Dissolved Prep 245.1 6ml 50 mL 550187 09/17/21 14:40 NK TAL DEN Dissolved Analysis 245.1 550308 09/17/21 19:06 NK TAL DEN Client Sample ID: C21090172-008D Lab Sample ID: 280-152688-8 Date Collected: 09/01/21 09:05 Matrix: Water Date Received: 09/08/21 09:40 ------------ Batch Batch 011 Initial Final Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab -----Dissolved Prep 245.1 6 ml 50 ml 550187 09/17/21 14:40 NK TAL DEN Dissolved Analysis 245.1 550308 09/17/21 19:08 NK TALDEN laboratory References: TAL DEN = Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver, 4955 Yarrow Street, Arvada, CO 80002, TEL (303)736-0100 Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver Page 12 of 15 Page 3iASlWQ021 Accreditation/Certification Summary Client: Energy Laboratories, Inc. Project/Site: 11(e) Byproduct Material Laboratory: Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver All accreditations/certifications held by this laboratory are listed. Not all accreditations/certifications are applicable to this report. Authority Progr~ Identification Number ----A2LA Dept. of Defense ELAP 2907,01 A2LA ISO/IEC 17025 2907.01 Alabama State Program 40730 Alaska (UST) State 18-001 Arizona State AZ0713 Arkansas DEQ State 19-047-0 California State 2513 Connecticut State PH-0686 Florida NELAP E87667-57 Georgia State 4025-011 Illinois NELAP 2000172019-1 Iowa State IA#370 Kansas NELAP E-10166 Kentucky (WN) State KY98047 Louisiana NELAP 30785 Louisiana NELAP 30785 Minnesota NELAP 1788752 Nevada State CO000262020-1 New Hampshire NELAP 205319 New Jersey NELAP 190002 New York NELAP 59923 North Carolina (WIN/SW) State 358 North Dakota State R-034 Oklahoma State 2018-006 Oregon NELAP 4025-011 Pennsylvania NELAP 013 South Carolina State 72002001 Texas NELAP TX 104 704183-08-TX Texas NELAP T104704183-20-18 US Fish & Wildlife US Federal Programs 058448 USDA US Federal Programs P330-20-00065 Utah NELAP QUAN5 Utah NELAP CO000262019-11 Virginia NELAP 10490 Washington State C583-19 West Virginia DEP State 354 Wisconsin State 999615430 Wyoming (UST) A2LA 2907.01 • Accreditation/Certification renewal pending -accreditation/certification considered valid. Page 13 of 15 Job ID: 280-152688-1 Expiration Date -11-02-21 11-02-21 09-30-12 * 02-28-22 12-21-21 06-01-21 * 01-08-22 09-30-22 06-30-22 01-08-22 04-30-22 12-02-22 04-30-22 12-31-21 06-30-14 * 06-30-22 12-31-21 07-31-22 04-29-22 07-01-22 04-01-22 12-31-21 01-08-22 09-01-21 * 01-08-22 07-31-22 01-08-22 09-30-09 * 09-30-21 07-31-22 03-06-23 06-30-13 * 07-31-21 * 06-14-22 08-03-22 11-30-21 08-31-22 10-31-21 Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver Page 39.6l!M2021 Energy Laboratories, Inc. 2393 Salt Creek Hwy Casper. WY 82601-9601 307235.0SlS Subcontractor Eurofins TA-Denver 4955 Yarrow St Arvada. CO 80002 TEL 3037360100 FAX. Acct#· 3037360100 Subcontractor's Client -I J C2109D172-0D1D J Aaueous liil llilllll!IIHIRllll\1111 C21090172 PO. ______ _ J 09/01/21 08:10 A I 1 250ML-P-F-HN03 CHAIN-Of--CUSTODY RECORD Earliest HT Expires. Wed, 9/29/2021 0810 Test Codes: CV AA-HG-245-W-D, PRP-HG-1 Earliest Due Date: 245 l # Bus. Days Until Due: Reouested Tests 0 -c < :0 .. ... _ ~ -,:, ,_ . ::t • ! :c G) ·t-t-, .. G'l ~ ;., ... ~ "' -~ 0 j ', 7 .__ ..._ ..._ ..._ .__ -.__ ......... ----._ .__ .__ '-~ .__ '--.__ .__ ._ '--'- Page 1 of 1 07-Sep-21 10/11/2021 24 ,_. ' . '-..._ -'-.._ .._ I C21090172-002D Aaueous [ C21090172-003D Aaueous I C21090172-004D Aaueous I 09/01/21 08:35 A 1, 250ML-P-F-HN03 ncim1n1 ni:nn A l1 ·25orJit-:P~-1-ni103 1-------------1 --···. ----I ITl 11:1 □ □ □ □ □ □ □ C --·-.. ---------1-----·-· ..... -I uJ DJ □□□□□□□ C --·-·· ------1--------. -~~ l ill m □ □ □ D □ □ □ C 09/01/21 09·35 A 11 250ML-P-F-HN03 I I I I I I I Ill I I I ~ I C21090172-00SD Aaueous [ C21090172-006D Aaueous C21090172--0070 L Aaueous~ C21090172-00SD I Comments: QC Level STD Aaueous --·-·· ---··---1---···-·. ----I ill GJ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ C 09/01/21 09:45 A 11 250ML-P-F-HN03 280-152688 Chain of Custody w,-.. ~--~.--nl• -·---·. ·-----I GJ DJ □□□□□□ D □ DU u u u LJ 09/01/21 09:55 A 11 --?'iOt.111':P.C-_1-aJn."!. 09/01/21 08:10 A 11 25DMI -P-F-HN03 -·-.. : ____ : __ ,_ -:: ... _~ ~::::-: I ill ill □□□□□□□□□□□□□□ I 09/01/21 09:05 A 11 250ML-P-F-HN03 1 -----------I -----UIJJD □ □ D □ □ □ □ D □ D □□DD ,.,., , i . I . . . . • I J-1ru \/ :;i'::.) ' .u:;_ vL'Skd r lYl ifw· 1 .,.ia; <Jc;~ fl/li-LIAvd --c-/'✓ /-1/ . ~ Relinquished y-:0",? ~~ Dateflitme Recec~ ~ ar~m;;, 101jl) ctl#?u4 Relinquished by: _____________ _ Shipped By· \ ~ ~ V /I✓ v~ Received by-'1~3 . -U-tf-\'lJJ Cu~tod~al Intact Temp Blank On Ice y N Receipt Temp 4:; "C 0 N 0 N .,... N 0 ~ ~ (8) (") Q) C) n, D.. ID .,... -0 ,;f' .,... Q) Cl ro 0.. Login Sample Receipt Checklist Client: Energy Laboratories, Inc. Login Number: 152688 List Number: 1 Creator: Dubicki, Adam L Question Radioactivity wasn't checked or is </= background as measured by a survey meter. The cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact. Sample custody seals, if present, are intact. The cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or tampered with. Samples were received on ice. Cooler Temperature is acceptable. Cooler Temperature is recorded. COC is present. COC is filled out in ink and legible. COC is filled out with all pertinent information. Is the Field Sampler's name present on COC? There are no discrepancies between the containers received and the COC. Samples are received within Holding Time (excluding tests with immediate HTs) Sample containers have legible labels. Containers are not broken or leaking. Sample collection date/times are provided. Appropriate sample containers are used. Sample bottles are completely filled. Sample Preservation Verified. There is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested MS/MSDs Containers requiring zero headspace have no headspace or bubble is <6mm (1/4"). Multiphasic samples are not present. Samples do not require splitting or compositing. Residual Chlorine Checked. Euroflns TestAmerica, Denver Answer True True True True True True True True True True N/A True True True True True True True True True N/A True True N/A Page 15 of 15 Job Number: 280-152688-1 List Source: Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver Comment Page 3ikil~021 E"-ERGY Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com QA/QC Summary Report Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 888.&86. 7175 • Helena, MT 877 .472.0711 Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Work Order: C21090172 Report Date: 09/15/21 Analyte Method: A2320 B Lab ID: ICV pH Method: A2320 B Lab ID: MBLK Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3 Lab ID: C21090172-003ADUP Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3 Qualifiers: RL -Analyte Reporting Limit Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPDLlmit Qual Initial Calibration Verification Standard 6.86 s.u. 0.010 Method Blank ND mg/L 5 Sample Duplicate ND mg/L 5.0 100 98 Analytical Run: MANTECH_210907A 09/07/21 12:18 102 Run: MANTECH_210907A Batch: R274282 09/07/21 12:22 Run: MANTECH_210907A 09/07/21 13:57 10 ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) Page 35 of 56 EN:RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com QA/QC Summary Report Billlngs, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 868.686.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Work Order: C21090172 Report Date: 09/15/21 Analyte Method: Lab ID: A2510 B SC 100 Conductivity @ 25 C Lab ID: SC 5000 Conductivity @ 25 C Lab ID: SC 20000 Conductivity @ 25 C Method: A2510 B Lab ID: SC 50000 Conductivity @ 25 C Lab ID: MBLK Conductivity @ 25 C Lab ID: C21090172-001 ADUP Conductivity @ 25 C Qualifiers: RL -Analyte Reporting Limit Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD RPDLimit Qual initial Calibration Verification Standard 104 umhos/cm 5.0 Initial Calibration Verification Standard 5010 umhos/cm 5.0 Initial Calibration Verification Standard 20200 umhos/cm 5.0 Initial Calibration Verification Standard 50000 umhos/cm 5.0 Method Blank 2 umhos/cm Sample Duplicate 76300 umhos/cm 5.0 Analytical Run: PHSC_ 101-C_210907A 104 90 110 100 90 110 101 90 110 Run: PHSC_ 101-C_210907A 100 90 110 Run: PHSC_101-C_210907A Run: PHSC_101-C_210907A 0.4 09/07/21 12:32 09/07/21 12:35 09/07/21 12:38 Batch: R274268 09/07/21 12:41 09/07/21 13:05 09/07/2113:15 10 ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) Page 36 of 56 Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 888.886.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 QA/QC Summary Report Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Work Order: C21090172 Report Date: 09/15/21 Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD RPDLimit Qual Method: A2540 C Batch: TDS2109078 Lab ID: MB-1_210907B Method Blank Run: BAL-111_2109078 09/07/21 13:51 Solids, Total Dissolved TDS@ 180 C ND mg/L 5 Lab ID: LCS-2_210907B Laboratory Control Sample Run: BAL-111_2109078 09/07/21 13:52 Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 993 mg/L 10 99 90 110 Lab ID: C21090172-001A DUP Sample Duplicate Run: BAL-111 2109078 09/07/21 13:53 - Solids, Total Dissolved TDS@ 180 C 578000 mg/L 1000 1.1 5 Method: A2540 C Batch: TDS210908A Lab ID: MB-1_210908A Method Blank Run: BAL-111_2109088 09/08/21 15:57 Solids, Total Dissolved TDS@ 180 C ND mg/L 5 Lab ID: LCS-2_210908A Laboratory Control Sample Run: BAL-111_2109088 09/08/21 15:58 Solids, Total Dissolved TDS@ 180 C 1000 mg/L 10 100 90 110 Lab ID: C21090172-001A DUP Sample Duplicate Run: BAL-111 -2109088 09/08/21 15:59 Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 593000 mg/L 5000 3.0 5 Qualifiers: RL -Analyte Reporting Limit ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) Page 37 of 56 El'l:RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 866.686.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 QA/QC Summary Report Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Work Order: C21090172 Report Date: 09/15/21 Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPDLimlt Qual Method: A4500-F C Batch: R274568 Lab ID: LCS Laboratory Control Sample Run: MANTECH_210914A 09/14/21 09:47 Fluoride 2.06 mg/L 0.10 103 90 110 Lab ID: MBLK Method Blank Run: MANTECH_210914A 09/14/21 09:54 Fluoride ND mg/L 0.03 Lab ID: C21090310-001 AMS Sample Matrix Spike Run: MANTECH_210914A 09/14/21 10:16 Fluoride 2.89 mg/L 0.10 107 90 110 Lab ID: C21090313-002AMS Sample Matrix Spike Run: MANTECH_210914A 09/14/21 11 :27 Fluoride 2.46 mg/L 0.10 111 90 110 s Lab ID: C21090313-003AOUP Sample Duplicate Run: MANTECH_210914A 09/14/21 11 :35 Fluoride 0.0500 mg/L 0.10 10 Lab ID: LCS Laboratory Control Sample Run: MANTECH_210914A 09/14/21 12:26 Fluoride 2.15 mg/L 0.10 107 90 110 Lab ID: C21090424-003AMS Sample Matrix Spike Run: MANTECH_210914A 09/14/21 13:30 Fluoride 2.41 mg/L 0.10 108 90 110 Lab ID: C21090424-004ADU P Sample Duplicate Run: MANTECH_210914A 09/14/21 13:37 Fluoride 0.0600 mg/L 0.10 10 Qualifiers: RL -Analyte Reporting Limit ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) S -Spike recovery outside of advisory limits Page 38 of 56 EI\ERGY Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 866.886.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 QA/QC Summary Report Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Work Order: C21090172 Report Date: 09/15/21 Analyte Method: A4500-H B Lab ID: 6.86 ~ pH Measurement Temp Method: Lab ID: pH A4500-H B C21090172-001ADUP pH Measurement Temp Qualifiers: RL -Analyte Reporting Limit Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD RPDLimit Qual 2 Initial Calibration Verification Standard Analytical Run: PHSC_ 101-C_210907 A 09/07/21 12:29 102 6.9 s.u. 18.3 ·c 2 Sample Duplicate 0.4 s.u. 16.4 ·c 0.1 100 0 0 Run: PHSC_101-C_210907A 0.1 ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) 0.0 Batch: R274268 09/07/21 13:15 1.5 Page 39 of 56 Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com QA/QC Summary Report Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 866.886.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Work Order: C21090172 Report Date: 09/15/21 Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPDLimit Qual Method: E300.0 Analytical Run: IC3-C_210908A Lab ID: ICV 2 Initial Calibration Verification Standard 09/08/21 15:01 Chloride 10.3 mg/L 1.0 103 90 110 Sulfate 40.2 mg/L 1.0 100 90 110 Method: E300.0 Batch: R274354 Lab ID: ICB 2 Method Blank Run: IC3-C_210908A 09/08/21 15:20 Chloride ND mg/L 0,06 Sulfate ND mg/L 0.1 Lab ID: LFB 2 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: IC3-C_210908A 09/08/21 15:39 Chloride 10.4 mg/L 1.0 104 90 110 Sulfate 41 .0 mg/L 1.0 102 90 110 Lab ID: C21090151-001AMS 2 Sample Matrix Spike Run: IC3-C_210908A 09/08/21 16:37 Chloride 89.0 mg/L 1.0 99 80 120 Sulfate 212 mg/L 2.1 102 80 120 Lab ID: C21090151-001AMSD 2 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: IC3-C_210908A 09/08/21 16:56 Chloride 88.8 mg/L 1.0 99 80 120 0.3 20 Sulfate 212 mg/L 2.1 102 80 120 0.1 20 Lab ID: C21090172-00BAMS 2 Sample Matrix Spike Run: IC3-C_210908A 09/08/21 21 :05 Chloride 676 mg/L 2.1 88 80 120 Sulfate 2340 mg/L 8.3 89 80 120 Lab ID: C21090172-00BAMSD 2 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: IC3-C_210908A 09/08/21 21 :24 Chloride 691 mg/L 2.1 96 80 120 2.2 20 Sulfate 2400 mg/L 8.3 97 80 120 2.4 20 Qualifiers: RL -Analyte Reporting Limit ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) Page 40 of 56 EI\ERGY Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 866.886.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 QA/QC Summary Report Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Work Order: C21090172 Report Date: 09/15/21 Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPDLimit Qual Method: E300.0 Analytical Run: IC3-C_210909A Lab ID: rev 2 Initial Calibration Verification Standard 09/09/21 14:43 Chloride 10.3 mg/L 1.0 103 90 110 Sulfate 40.1 mg/L 1.0 100 90 110 Method: E300.0 Batch: R274399 Lab ID: ICB 2 Method Blank Run: IC3-C_210909A 09/09/21 15:02 Chloride ND mg/L 0.06 Sulfate ND mg/L 0.1 Lab ID: LFB 2 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: IC3-C_210909A 09/09/21 15:21 Chloride 10.5 mg/L 1.0 105 90 110 Sulfate 41.2 mg/L 1.0 103 90 110 Lab ID: C21090315-001 AMS 2 Sample Matrix Spike Run: IC3-C_210909A 09/09/21 20:46 Chloride 664 mg/L 5.2 102 80 120 Sulfate 4150 mg/L 21 99 80 120 Lab ID: C21090315-001AMSD 2 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: IC3-C_210909A 09/09/21 21 :05 Chloride 670 mg/L 5.2 103 80 120 1 20 Sulfate 4200 mg/L 21 101 80 120 1.2 20 Qualifiers: RL -Analyte Reporting Limit ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) Page 41 of 56 El'ERGY Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com Billings, MT 800. 735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 866.886.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 QA/QC Summary Report Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Work Order: C21090172 Report Date: 09/15/21 Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPDLimit Qual Method: E350.1 Lab ID: ICV Initial Calibration Verification Standard Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 1.01 mg/L 0.050 Method: E350.1 Lab ID: MBLK Method Blank Nitrogen, Ammonia as N ND mg/L 0.01 Lab ID: LFB Laboratory Fortified Blank Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 0.989 mg/L 0.050 Lab ID: C21090127-001CMS Sample Matrix Spike Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 1.03 mg/L 0.050 Lab ID: C21090127-001 CMSD Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 1.10 mg/L 0.050 Method: E350.1 Lab ID: ICV Initial Calibration Verification Standard Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 0.994 mg/L 0.050 Method: E350.1 Lab ID: MBLK Method Blank Nitrogen, Ammonia as N ND mg/L 0.01 Lab ID: LFB Laboratory Fortified Blank Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 0.974 mg/L 0.050 Lab ID: C21090388-001 CMS Sample Matrix Spike Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 0.803 mg/L 0.050 Lab ID: C21090388-001CMSD Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 0.793 mg/L 0.050 Qualifiers: 101 100 74 81 99 98 76 75 90 Analytical Run: FIA201-C_210911A 09/11/21 11 :28 110 Batch: R274450 Run: FIA201-C_210911A 09/11/21 11 :27 Run: FIA201-C_210911A 09/11/21 11 :29 90 110 Run: FIA201-C_210911A 09/11/2111:31 90 110 s Run: FIA201-C_210911A 09/11/21 11 :33 90 110 6.6 10 s 90 Analytical Run: FIA201-C_210911 B 09/11/21 12:58 110 Batch: R274451 Run: FIA201-C_210911B 09/11/2112:57 Run: FIA201-C_210911 B 09/11/21 12:59 90 110 Run: FIA201-C_210911 B 09/11/21 13:02 90 110 s Run: FIA201-C_210911B 09/11/21 13:03 90 110 1.3 10 s RL -Analyte Reporting Limit ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) S -Spike recovery outside of advisory limits Page 42 of 56 Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com QA/QC Summary Report Billings, MT 800. 735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 866.886.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Work Order: C21090172 Report Date: 09/15/21 Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD RPDLimit Qual Method: E353.2 Lab ID: ICV Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N Method: E353.2 Lab ID: MBLK Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N Lab ID: LFB Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N Lab ID: C21090178-001 CMS Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N Lab ID: C21090178-001 CMSD Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N Qualifiers: RL -Analyte Reporting Limit Initial Calibration Verification Standard 1.01 mg/L 0.010 101 Method Blank ND mg/L 0.009 Laboratory Fortified Blank 1.01 mg/L 0.010 102 Sample Matrix Spike 1.54 mg/L 0.010 104 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate 1.57 mg/L 0.010 107 90 Analytical Run : FIA201 -C_210913B 09/13/21 14:41 110 Batch: R274495 Run: FIA201-C_210913B 09/13/21 14:42 Run: FIA201-C_210913B 09/13/21 14:44 90 110 Run: FIA201-C_210913B 09/13/21 14:57 90 110 Run: FIA201-C_210913B 09/13/21 14:58 90 110 2.0 10 ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) Page 43 of 56 EN:RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com QA/QC Summary Report Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 866.686.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Work Order: C21090172 Revised Date: 10/29/21 Report Date: 10/15/21 Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPDLimit Qual Method: E200.7 Analytical Run: ICP4-C_210916A Lab ID: QCS 16 Initial Calibration Verification Standard 09/16/21 09: 13 Arsenic 0.792 mg/L 0.10 99 95 105 Beryllium 0.388 mg/L 0.010 97 95 105 Cadmium 0.389 mg/L 0.010 97 95 105 Calcium 39.2 mg/L 0.50 98 95 105 Chromium 0.760 mg/L 0.050 95 95 105 Copper 0.764 mg/L 0.014 96 95 105 Iron 3.87 mg/L 0.10 97 95 105 Lead 0.769 mg/L 0.050 96 95 105 Magnesium 39.1 mg/L 0.50 98 95 105 Manganese 3.77 mg/L 0.010 94 95 105 s Molybdenum 0.770 mg/L 0.10 96 95 105 Potassium 38.4 mg/L 0.50 96 95 105 Selenium 0.786 mg/L 0.10 98 95 105 Sodium 37.9 mg/L 0.53 95 95 105 Vanadium 0.765 mg/L 0.10 96 95 105 Zinc 0.757 mg/L 0.010 95 95 105 Method: E200.7 Batch: R274625 Lab ID: LFB 16 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: ICP4-C_210916A 09/16/21 09:09 Arsenic 0.968 mg/L 0.10 97 85 115 Beryllium 0.478 mg/L 0.010 96 85 115 Cadmium 0.473 mg/L 0.010 95 85 115 Calcium 48.3 mg/L 0.50 97 85 115 Chromium 0.924 mg/L 0.050 92 85 115 Copper 0.916 mg/L 0.014 92 85 115 Iron 4.77 mg/L 0.10 95 85 115 Lead 0.928 mg/L 0.050 93 85 115 Magnesium 48.4 mg/L 0.50 97 85 115 Manganese 4.64 mg/L 0.010 93 85 115 Molybdenum 0.955 mg/L 0.10 95 85 115 Potassium 47.3 mg/L 0.50 95 85 115 Selenium 0.933 mg/L 0.10 93 85 115 Sodium 47.1 mg/L 0.54 94 85 115 Vanadium 0.940 mg/L 0.10 94 85 115 Zinc 0.921 mg/L 0.010 92 85 115 Lab ID: C21090009-003CMS2 16 Sample Matrix Spike Run: ICP4-C_210916A 09/16/21 09:51 Arsenic 1.03 mg/L 0.014 103 70 130 Beryllium 0.485 mg/L 0.0010 97 70 130 Cadmium 0.491 mg/L 0.0019 98 70 130 Calcium 111 mg/L 1.0 95 70 130 Chromium 0.947 mg/L 0.0050 95 70 130 Copper 0.935 mg/L 0.010 93 70 130 Iron 5.49 mg/L 0.026 97 70 130 Lead 0.949 mg/L 0.021 95 70 130 Qualifiers: RL -Analyte Reporting Limit ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) S -Spike recovery outside of advisory limits Page 44 of 56 Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 866.688.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 QA/QC Summary Report Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Work Order: C21090172 Revised Date: 10/29/21 Report Date: 10/15/21 Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPDLimit Qual Method: E200.7 Batch: R274625 Lab ID: C21090009-003CMS2 16 Sample Matrix Spike Run: ICP4-C_210916A 09/16/21 09:51 Magnesium 67.3 mg/L 1.0 98 70 130 Manganese 4.69 mg/L 0.0010 93 70 130 Molybdenum 0.975 mg/L 0.0051 98 70 130 Potassium 49.9 mg/L 1.0 97 70 130 Selenium 0.986 mg/L 0.050 99 70 130 Sodium 53.0 mg/L 1.0 97 70 130 Vanadium 0.947 mg/L 0.010 95 70 130 Zinc 0.956 mg/L 0.010 94 70 130 Lab ID: C21090009-003CMSD 16 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: ICP4-C_210916A 09/16/21 09:55 Arsenic 1.03 mg/L 0.014 103 70 130 0.1 20 Beryllium 0.486 mg/L 0.0010 97 70 130 0.2 20 Cadmium 0.488 mg/L 0.0019 98 70 130 0.5 20 Calcium 112 mg/L 1.0 98 70 130 1.1 20 Chromium 0.958 mg/L 0.0050 96 70 130 1.2 20 Copper 0.949 mg/L 0.010 95 70 130 1.6 20 Iron 5.51 mg/L 0.026 98 70 130 0.5 20 Lead 0.975 mg/L 0.021 97 70 130 2.6 20 Magnesium 68.4 mg/L 1.0 101 70 130 1.7 20 Manganese 4.72 mg/L 0.0010 94 70 130 0.7 20 Molybdenum 0.982 mg/L 0.0051 98 70 130 0.7 20 Potassium 50.3 mg/L 1.0 98 70 130 0.9 20 Selenium 0.995 mg/L 0.050 99 70 130 0.9 20 Sodium 53.6 mg/L 1.0 98 70 130 1.0 20 Vanadium 0.960 mg/L 0.010 96 70 130 1.4 20 Zinc 0.965 mg/L 0.010 95 70 130 0.9 20 Lab ID: MB-63857 16 Method Blank Run: ICP4-C_210916A 09/16/21 12:30 Arsenic ND mg/L 0.05 Beryllium ND mg/L 0.0003 Cadmium ND mg/L 0.003 Calcium ND mg/L 0.1 Chromium ND mg/L 0.004 Copper ND mg/L 0.02 Iron ND mg/L 0.007 Lead ND mg/L 0.05 Magnesium ND mg/L 0.08 Manganese ND mg/L 0.001 Molybdenum ND mg/L 0.008 Potassium ND mg/L 0.2 Selenium ND mg/L 0.05 Sodium ND mg/L Vanadium ND mg/L 0.006 Zinc ND mg/L 0.003 Qualifiers: RL -Analyte Reporting Limit ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) Page 45 of 56 Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com QA/QC Summary Report Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 866.886.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Work Order: C21090172 Revised Date: 10/29/21 Report Date: 10/15/21 Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPDLlmit Qual Method: E200.7 Analytical Run: ICP4-C_210920A Lab ID: QCS 13 Initial Calibration Verification Standard 09/20/21 21 : 19 Arsenic 0.822 mg/L 0.10 103 90 110 Calcium 40.9 mg/L 0.50 102 90 110 Cobalt 0.764 mg/L 0.020 95 90 110 Copper 0.778 mg/L 0.014 97 90 110 Iron 4.07 mg/L 0.10 102 90 110 Lead 0.780 mg/L 0.050 97 90 110 Manganese 3.96 mg/L 0.010 99 90 110 Molybdenum 0,787 mg/L 0.10 98 90 110 Nickel 0.784 mg/L 0.050 98 90 110 Potassium 40.7 mg/L 0.50 102 90 110 Sodium 40.8 mg/L 0.53 102 90 110 Vanadium 0.802 mg/L 0.10 100 90 110 Zinc 0.772 mg/L 0.010 97 90 110 Method: E200.7 Batch: R274769 Lab ID: LFB 13 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: ICP4-C_210920A 09/20/21 21 : 15 Arsenic 1.02 mg/L 0.10 102 85 115 Calcium 49.8 mg/L 0.50 100 85 115 Cobalt 0.929 mg/L 0.020 93 85 115 Copper 0.942 mg/L 0.014 94 85 115 Iron 4.94 mg/L 0.10 99 85 115 Lead 0.955 mg/L 0.050 95 85 115 Manganese 4.83 mg/L 0.010 97 85 115 Molybdenum 0.985 mg/L 0.10 98 85 115 Nickel 0.949 mg/L 0.050 95 85 115 Potassium 49.7 mg/L 0.50 99 85 115 Sodium 49.6 mg/L 0.54 99 85 115 Vanadium 0.980 mg/L 0.10 98 85 115 Zinc 0.942 mg/L 0.010 94 85 115 Lab ID: MB-63857 13 Method Blank Run: ICP4-C_210920A 09/21/21 04:48 Arsenic ND mg/L 0.05 Calcium ND mg/L 0.1 Cobalt ND mg/L 0.006 Copper ND mg/L 0.02 Iron ND mg/L 0.007 Lead ND mg/L 0.05 Manganese ND mg/L 0.001 Molybdenum ND mg/L 0.008 Nickel ND mg/L 0.01 Potassium ND mg/L 0.2 Sodium ND mg/L Vanadium ND mg/L 0.006 Zinc ND mg/L 0.003 Qualifiers: RL -Analyte Reporting Limit ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) Page 46 of 56 E"-1:RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 866.686.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 QA/QC Summary Report Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Work Order: C21090172 Revised Date: 10/29/21 Report Date: 10/15/21 Analyte Count Result Units Method: E200.7 Lab ID: C21090172-001 BMS2 13 Sample Matrix Spike Arsenic 1940 mg/L Calcium 45700 mg/L Cobalt 894 mg/L Copper 4640 mg/L Iron 10800 mg/L Lead 948 mg/L Manganese 6260 mg/L Molybdenum 1410 mg/L Nickel 938 mg/L Potassium 50500 mg/L Sodium 123000 mg/L Vanadium 5240 mg/L Zinc 1890 mg/L Lab ID: C21090172-001 BMSD 13 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Arsenic 1890 mg/L Calcium 49700 mg/L Cobalt 881 mg/L Copper 4650 mg/L Iron 11000 mg/L Lead 924 mg/L Manganese 6630 mg/L Molybdenum 1430 mg/L Nickel 941 mg/L Potassium 54600 mg/L Sodium 124000 mg/L Vanadium 5280 mg/L Zinc 1890 mg/L Qualifiers: RL -Analyte Reporting Limit ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) RL %REC Low Limit High Limit Run: ICP4-C_210920A 26 95 70 130 260 91 70 130 26 83 70 130 26 88 70 130 61 83 70 130 96 87 70 130 1.3 93 70 130 26 99 70 130 26 91 70 130 260 93 70 130 540 62 70 130 26 70 130 26 85 70 130 Run: ICP4-C_210920A 26 90 70 130 260 99 70 130 26 82 70 130 26 90 70 130 61 87 70 130 96 85 70 130 1.3 100 70 130 26 101 70 130 26 92 70 130 260 101 70 130 540 63 70 130 26 70 130 26 85 70 130 RPO RPDLimit Qual 2.2 8.6 1.4 0.4 1.9 2.5 5.8 1.4 0.4 7.9 0.5 0.6 0.1 Batch: R274769 09/21/21 05:05 s A 09/21/21 05:08 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 s 20 A 20 A -Analyte level was greater than four times the spike level -in accordance with the method, percent recovery is not calculated S -Spike recovery outside of advisory limits Page 47 of 56 EI\ERGY Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.ener9ylab com Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 866.686.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 QA/QC Summary Report Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Work Order: C21090172 Revised Date: 10/29/21 Report Date: 10/15/21 Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPDLimit Qual Method: E200.7 Analytical Run: ICP4-C_210921A Lab ID: QCS 5 Initial Calibration Verification Standard 09/21/21 23:58 Beryllium 0.396 mg/L Cobalt 0.751 mg/L Nickel 0.768 mg/L Selenium 0.788 mg/L Zinc 0.765 mg/L Method: E200.7 Lab ID: LFB 5 Laboratory Fortified Blank Beryllium 0.483 mg/L Cobalt 0.917 mg/L Nickel 0.930 mg/L Selenium 0.952 mg/L Zinc 0.937 mg/L Lab ID: MB-63857 5 Method Blank Beryllium ND mg/L Cobalt ND mg/L Nickel ND mg/L Selenium ND mg/L Zinc ND mg/L Lab ID: C21090172-007BMS2 5 Sample Matrix Spike Beryllium 12.8 mg/L Cobalt 69.7 mg/L Nickel 36.1 mg/L Selenium 43.4 mg/L Zinc 745 mg/L Lab ID: C21090172-007BMSD 5 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Beryllium 13.6 mg/L Cobalt 69.9 mg/L Nickel 37.1 mg/L Selenium 45.1 mg/L Zinc 719 mg/L Qualifiers: RL -Analyte Reporting Limit ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) 0.010 99 95 105 0.020 94 95 105 s 0.050 96 95 105 0.10 98 95 105 0.010 96 95 105 Batch: R274806 Run: ICP4-C_210921A 09/21/21 23:54 0.010 97 85 115 0.020 92 85 115 0.050 93 85 115 0.10 95 85 115 0.010 94 85 115 Run : ICP4-C_210921A 09/22/21 02:16 0.0003 0.006 0.01 0,05 0.003 Run: ICP4-C_210921A 09/22/21 02:37 0.016 79 70 130 0.64 98 70 130 0.64 88 70 130 0.64 109 70 130 0.64 70 130 A Run: ICP4-C_210921A 09/22/21 02:42 0.016 86 70 130 6.6 20 0.64 99 70 130 0.3 20 0.64 92 70 130 2.8 20 0.64 116 70 130 3.9 20 0.64 70 130 3.5 20 A A -Analyte level was greater than four times the spike level -in accordance with the method, percent recovery is not calculated S -Spike recovery outside of advisory limits Page 48 of 56 EN:RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com QA/QC Summary Report Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 866.686.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Work Order: C21090172 Revised Date: 10/29/21 Report Date: 10/15/21 Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPDLimit Qual Method: E200.7 Lab ID: QCS Nickel Method: E200.7 Lab ID: LFB Nickel Lab ID: MB-63857 Nickel Lab ID: C21090172-007BMS2 Nickel Lab ID: C21090172-007BMSD Nickel Qualifiers: RL -Analyte Reporting Limit Initial Calibration Verification Standard 0.772 mg/L 0.050 Laboratory Fortified Blank 0.943 mg/L 0.050 Method Blank ND mg/L 0.01 Sample Matrix Spike 59.3 mg/L 1.3 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate 60.5 mg/L 1.3 97 95 105 Run: ICP4-C_210924A 94 85 115 Run: ICP4-C_210924A Run: ICP4-C_210924A 84 70 130 Run: ICP4-C_210924A 86 70 130 Analytical Run: ICP4-C_210924A 09/24/21 14:46 Batch: R274970 09/24/21 14:42 09/24/21 15:29 09/24/21 15:42 09/24/2115:46 1.9 20 ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) Page 49 of 56 EN:RGY I Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com QA/QC Summary Report Billines, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 866.686.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Work Order: C21090172 Revised Date: 10/29/21 Report Date: 10/15/21 Analyte Method: Lab ID: Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Iron E200.8 QCS Lead Magnesium Manganese Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Silver Sodium Tin Uranium Method: E200.8 Lab ID: LFB Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Silver Sodium Tin Uranium Lab ID: Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Iron MB-63857 Lead Magnesium Manganese Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Silver Sodium Qualifiers: RL -Analyte Reporting Limit Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD RPDLimit Qual Analytical Run: ICPMS5-C_210925A 14 Initial Calibration Verification Standard 09/26/21 00:38 0.0501 mg/L 0.0010 100 90 110 0.0243 mg/L 0.0010 97 90 110 0.0482 mg/L 0.0050 96 90 110 0.244 mg/L 0.020 97 90 110 0.0478 mg/L 0.0010 96 90 110 2.46 mg/L 0.50 98 90 110 0.245 mg/L 0.0010 98 90 110 0.0466 mg/L 0.0010 93 90 110 0.0496 mg/L 0.0050 99 90 110 0.0502 mg/L 0.0010 100 90 110 0.0250 mg/L 0.0010 100 90 110 2.46 mg/L 0.50 98 90 110 0.0477 mg/L 0.050 95 90 110 0.0186 mg/L 0.00030 93 90 110 Batch: R274971 14 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: ICPMS5-C_210925A 09/25/21 21 :35 0.0479 mg/L 0.0010 96 85 115 0.0469 mg/L 0.0010 94 85 115 0.0485 mg/L 0.0050 97 85 115 4.90 mg/L 0.020 98 85 115 0.0476 mg/L 0.0010 95 85 115 48.3 mg/L 0.50 97 85 115 0.0481 mg/L 0.0010 96 85 115 0.0496 mg/L 0.0010 99 85 115 0.0482 mg/L 0.0050 96 85 115 0.0472 mg/L 0.0010 94 85 115 0.0184 mg/L 0.0010 92 85 115 48.6 mg/L 0.50 97 85 115 0.0495 mg/L 0.050 99 85 115 0.0482 mg/L 0.00030 96 85 115 14 Method Blank Run: ICPMS5-C_210925A 09/26/21 07:10 ND mg/L 0.00006 ND mg/L 0.00002 ND mg/L 0.00008 ND mg/L 0.003 ND mg/L 0.00005 ND mg/L 0.02 ND mg/L 0.0001 0.0001 mg/L 0.00005 ND mg/L 0.0002 ND mg/L 0.0001 ND mg/L 0.00001 ND mg/L 0.3 ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) Page 50 of 56 EN:RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 866.686.7175 • Helena, MT877.472.0711 QA/QC Summary Report Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Work Order: C21090172 Revised Date: 10/29/21 Report Date: 10/15/21 Analyte Count Result Units Method: E200.8 Lab ID: MB-63857 14 Method Blank Tin 0.0003 mg/L Uranium ND mg/L Lab ID: C21090172-001 BMS 14 Sample Matrix Spike Arsenic 1090 mg/L Cadmium 25.3 mg/L Chromium 38.6 mg/L Iron 8240 mg/L Lead 31.4 mg/L Magnesium 19000 mg/L Manganese 1670 mg/L Molybdenum 418 mg/L Nickel 28.8 mg/L Selenium 28.9 mg/L Silver 4.48 mg/L Sodium 78900 mg/L Tin 6.64 mg/L Uranium 220 mg/L Lab ID: C21090172-001 BMSD 14 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Arsenic 1110 mg/L Cadmium 25.5 mg/L Chromium 39.0 mg/L Iron 8490 mg/L Lead 31.4 mg/L Magnesium 19100 mg/L Manganese 1700 mg/L Molybdenum 429 mg/L Nickel 28.9 mg/L Selenium 29.8 mg/L Silver 4.45 mg/L Sodium 79900 mg/L Tin 6.64 mg/L Uranium 221 mg/L Qualifiers: RL -Analyte Reporting Limit ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPDLimit Qual Batch: R274971 Run: ICPMS5-C_210925A 09/26/21 07:10 0.0001 0.00001 Run: ICPMS5-C_210925A 09/26/21 07:19 0.010 70 130 AE 0.010 70 130 A 0.010 70 130 A 0.49 70 130 A 0.010 70 130 A 2.6 72 70 130 0.011 70 130 AE 0.010 70 130 A 0.026 70 130 A 0.022 70 130 A 0.0041 92 70 130 E 32 70 130 A 0.050 96 70 130 0.010 70 130 A Run: ICPMS5-C_210925A 09/26/21 07:24 0.010 70 130 1.3 20 AE 0.010 70 130 0.8 20 A 0.010 70 130 1.0 20 A 0.49 70 130 2.9 20 A 0.010 70 130 0.1 20 A 2.6 74 70 130 0.3 20 0.011 70 130 1.7 20 AE 0.010 70 130 2.5 20 A 0.026 70 130 0.5 20 A 0.022 70 130 3.1 20 A 0.0041 91 70 130 0.7 20 E 32 70 130 1.2 20 A 0.050 96 70 130 0.1 20 0.010 70 130 0.4 20 A A -Analyte level was greater than four times the spike level -in accordance with the method, percent recovery is not calculated E -Estimated value -result exceeds the instrument upper quantitation limit Page 51 of 56 Er\ERGY Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 886.888.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 QA/QC Summary Report Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Work Order: C21090172 Revised Date: 10/29/21 Report Date: 10/15/21 Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPDLimit Qual Method: E200.8 Analytical Run: ICPMS5-C_210927A Lab ID: QCS 3 Initial Calibration Verification Standard 09/28/21 07:41 Cobalt 0.0486 mg/L 0.0050 97 90 110 Thallium 0.0435 mg/L 0.00050 87 90 110 s Uranium 0.0186 mg/L 0.00030 93 90 110 Method: E200.8 Batch: R274993 Lab ID: LFB 3 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: ICPMS5-C_210927A 09/27/21 10:43 Cobalt 0.0493 mg/L 0.0050 99 85 115 Thallium 0.0493 mg/L 0.00050 99 85 115 Uranium 0.0507 mg/L 0.00030 101 85 115 Lab ID: C21090516-001 CMS 3 Sample Matrix Spike Run: ICPMS5-C_210927A 09/28/21 08:21 Cobalt 0.103 mg/L 0.0050 103 70 130 Thallium 0.0949 mg/L 0.00050 95 70 130 Uranium 0.134 mg/L 0.00030 108 70 130 Lab ID: C21090516-001CMSD 3 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: ICPMS5-C_210927A 09/28/21 08:26 Cobalt 0.103 mg/L 0.0050 103 70 130 0.0 20 Thallium 0.0994 mg/L 0.00050 99 70 130 4.7 20 Uranium 0.134 mg/L 0.00030 108 70 130 0.0 20 Lab ID: MB-63857 3 Method Blank Run: ICPMS5-C_210927A 09/28/21 08:36 Cobalt ND mg/L 0.00002 Thallium ND mg/L 0.0003 Uranium ND mg/L 0.00001 Qualifiers: RL -Analyte Reporting Limit ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) S -Spike recovery outside of advisory limits Page 52 of 56 EN:RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 866.686.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 QA/QC Summary Report Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Work Order: C21090172 Revised Date: 10/29/21 Report Date: 10/15/21 Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD RPDLlmit Qual Method: E200.8 Analytical Run: ICPMS5-C_211011A Lab ID: QCS 2 Initial Calibration Verification Standard 10/11/21 14:46 Copper 0.0520 mg/L 0.0050 104 90 110 Uranium 0.0190 mg/L 0.00030 95 90 110 Method: E200.8 Batch: R275502 Lab ID: LFB 2 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: ICPMS5-C_211011A 10/11/21 08:03 Copper 0.0534 mg/L 0.0050 107 85 115 Uranium 0.0539 mg/L 0.00030 108 85 115 Lab ID: MB-63857 4 Method Blank Run: ICPMS5-C_211011A 10/11/2115:12 Copper 0.0002 mg/L 0.0002 Lead ND mg/L 0.00005 Thallium ND mg/L 0.0003 Uranium 0.0002 mg/L 0.00001 Lab ID: C21090172-007BMS 2 Sample Matrix Spike Run: ICPMS5-C_211011A 10/11/21 15:26 Copper 3270 mg/L 0.98 70 130 AE Uranium 542 mg/L 0.10 70 130 A Lab ID: C21090172-007BMSD 2 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: ICPMS5-C_211011A 10/11/21 15:31 Copper 3290 mg/L 0.98 70 130 0.5 20 AE Uranium 544 mg/L 0.10 70 130 0.4 20 A Method: E200.8 Analytical Run: ICPMS5-C_211104A Lab ID: QCS 3 Initial Calibration Verification Standard 11/05/21 13:12 Lead 0.0468 mg/L Thallium 0.0501 mg/L Uranium 0.0188 mg/L Method: E200.8 Lab ID: LFB 3 Laboratory Fortified Blank Lead 0.0489 mg/L Thallium 0.0500 mg/L Uranium 0.0501 mg/L Lab ID: C21100671-002BMS 3 Sample Matrix Spike Lead 0.0489 mg/L Thallium 0.0461 mg/L Uranium 0.0557 mg/L Lab ID: C21100671-002BMSD 3 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Lead 0.0492 mg/L Thallium 0.0474 mg/L Uranium 0.0562 mg/L Qualifiers: RL -Analyte Reporting Limit ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) 0.0010 94 90 110 0.00050 100 90 110 0.00030 94 90 110 Batch: R276471 Run: ICPMS5-C_211104A 11/04/21 16:40 0.0010 101 85 115 0.00050 103 85 115 0.00030 103 85 115 Run: ICPMS5-C_211104A 11 /05/21 15:50 0.0010 101 70 130 0.00050 95 70 130 0.00030 102 70 130 Run: ICPMS5-C_211104A 11/05/21 15:55 0.0010 101 70 130 0.7 20 0.00050 98 70 130 2.7 20 0.00030 103 70 130 0.9 20 A -Analyte level was greater than four times the spike level -in accordance with the method, percent recovery is not calculated E -Estimated value -result exceeds the instrument upper quantitation limit Page 53 of 56 EI\ERGY Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 Gillette, WY 866.688.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 QA/QC Summary Report Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Work Order: C21090172 Revised Date: 10/29/21 Report Date: 10/15/21 Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD RPDLimit Qual Method: E200.8 Analytical Run: ICPMS5-C_211107A Lab ID: QCS Initial Calibration Verification Standard 11/08/21 12:03 Thallium 0.0511 mg/L 0.00050 102 90 110 Method: E200.8 Batch: R276540 Lab ID: LFB Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: ICPMS5-C_211107A 11/07/2118:36 Thallium 0.0472 mg/L 0.00050 94 85 115 Lab ID: C21100751-00JAMS Sample Matrix Spike Run: ICPMS5-C_211107A 11/08/21 04:18 Thallium 0.486 mg/L 0.0016 97 70 130 Lab ID: C21100751-00JAMSD Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: ICPMS5-C_211107A 11/08/21 04:23 Thallium 0.496 mg/L 0.0016 99 70 130 2.1 20 Method: E200.8 Analytical Run: ICPMS5-C_211109A Lab ID: QCS Initial Calibration Verification Standard 11/09/21 12:10 Thallium 0.0510 mg/L 0.00050 102 90 110 Method: E200.8 Batch: R276593 Lab ID: LFB Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: ICPMS5-C_211109A 11/09/21 12:52 Thallium 0.0519 mg/L 0.00050 104 85 115 Lab ID: C21100859-001BMS Sample Matrix Spike Run: ICPMS5-C_211109A 11/09/21 14:41 Thallium 0.281 mg/L 0.00052 112 70 130 Lab ID: C21100859-001 BMSD Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: ICPMS5-C_211109A 11/09/21 14:46 Thallium 0.285 mg/L 0.00052 114 70 130 1.3 20 Qualifiers: RL -Analyte Reporting Limit ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) Page 54 of 56 Trust our People. Trust our Data. www.energylab.com Work Order Receipt Checklist Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Login completed by: Kirsten L. Smith Reviewed by: Misty Stephens Reviewed Date: 9/7/2021 Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Custody seals intact on all shipping container(s)/cooler(s)? Custody seals intact on all sample bottles? Chain of custody present? Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received? Chain of custody agrees with sample labels? Samples in proper container/bottle? Sample containers intact? Sufficient sample volume for indicated test? All samples received within holding time? (Exclude analyses that are considered field parameters such as pH, DO, Res Cl, Sulfite, Ferrous Iron, etc.) Temp Blank received in all shipping container(s)/cooler(s)? Container/Temp Blank temperature: Containers requiring zero headspace have no headspace or bubble that is <6mm (1/4"). Water -pH acceptable upon receipt? Yes 0 Yes 0 Yes D Yes 0 Yes 0 Yes 0 Yes 0 Yes 0 Yes 0 Yes 0 Yes D 5.1°C On Ice Yes D Yes D Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515 GIiiette, WY 868.888.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711 C21090172 Date Received: 9/3/2021 Received by: cml Carrier name: NOA No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 Not Present D Not Present D Not Present 0 Not Applicable 0 No VOA vials submitted 0 Not Applicable 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------_::..::.-.:.::.-:.-::.-_-------------------------------------- Standard Reporting Procedures: Lab measurement of analytes considered field parameters that require analysis within 15 minutes of sampling such as pH, Dissolved Oxygen and Residual Chlorine, are qualified as being analyzed outside of recommended holding time. Solid/soil samples are reported on a wet weight basis (as received) unless specifically indicated. If moisture corrected, data units are typically noted as -dry. For agricultural and mining soil parameters/characteristics, all samples are dried and ground prior to sample analysis. Radiochemical precision results represent a 2-sigma Total Measurement Uncertainty. Contact and Corrective Action Comments: Dissolved Metals/Hardness were filtered and preserved to pH <2 with 2 ml of nitric acid per 250 ml in the laboratory. According to 40CFR 136, samples for Dissolved Metals should be filtered and preserved within 15 minutes of collection. Page 55 of 56 - Er\ERGY. ~,a""~~R~O~ m:I Chain of Custody & Analytical Request Record TrustOUTflltoplt.llllstou, Om. www .energylab.com Account Information @ing1nromr.it1Et1l Report Information f! different than Account lnfomrsllon. Company/Name Energy FUels Company/Name Contact Kathy Welnel Contact Phone (303) 389-4134 Phone Ma!lng Address 225 Union Blvd, Suite 600 Manlng Address City. Stale, Zip Lakewood, co 80228 City, State, Zip Eman kweinel@energyfuels.com Emall Receive Invoice OHard Copy ■Eman Receive Report CHard Copy Eman Receive Report CHard Copy DEma! Pu.'thase Order I Quote C5645 BcWeOrdef' Special RepM/Famals: C LEVEt IV D Na.AC C EDD/EDT {cxdllCI laborato,y) C Other. STD EFRI & ~- Project Information Matrix Codes Anal•,sis Requested ProJect Name, PWSIO, Penni!. etc. Annual Tailings 2021 A• PJr IX W-Watm 0 Sampler Name Tanner Holliday SamplerPhone(435)678-4115 S • Solts/ a, 0 Solds 0 Sample Origin State Utah EPA/State Compliance ■ Yes CNo V• v.-i > 0 URANIUM MINING CLIENTS MUST lndlcat8 sample typ•. B• BlollSsay ~ O• O!her D NOT Source ot Byproduct Material It) rJW-~ ~ C Source/Processed Ore (Ground or Reflll8d) ••CALL BEFORE SENDING ■ 11&.(2) Byproduct Malerlal (Can ONLY be Submitted 10 EU Casoer Location) in Oci, Collectlon Matrix ~g Sample Identification Numberof eo,,,._,, ~~ =>> {Name. Local1on. lnteMJI. ete.) Date Time _, Oen 1 Cell 1 9/1/21 8:10 am 4 0 X 2 Slimes#2 9/1/21 8:35am 4 0 X 3 Cell4A 9/1/21 9:20am 4 0 X 4 Cell 4A LOS 9/1/21 9:35am 4 0 X 5 Cell 4B 9/1/21 9:45am 4 0 X a Cell4B LOS 9/1/21 9:55am 4 0 X 1 Cell 65 9/1/21 8:10 am 4 0 X a Cell3 9/1/21 9:05am 4 0 X 9 10 Oat..mne Page _1 __ of _1 __ Comments samples HAVE NOT BEEN FrLTERED All turnaround Umes are standard unless marked as RUSH. Energy Laboratories MUST be contacted prior to RUSH sample submittal for ,, ci, charges and scheduling -J:! u See Instructions Page as i I■ I ~ .. ELI LAB ID u, ~ Use On/'t TAT -';).I rff D /1-;;L --. -~ ---SlgnllU/8 I I Custody Record MUSTj:::(~tlV Hell;A,,, j9/WP!l,! llOQ ~ ~ j j I • 1 bes(gnedRNlnntddlAl'lhulnl'Vl.1\ 'Kr,,.. .... ""--~-_:::z; ... _.._ _ _...., __ ,_ .... _"'riaii:,,ii;l. __Slanatu.N 7 __,,,,. - Shipped By Cooler IO(s) Custody Seals Y N C B Intact y N LABORATORY USE ONL· Receipt Temp I Temp Blanlt I On Ice I Payment Type •c Y N Y N CC Cash Check. ___ _ In certain circumstances, samples submitted lo Energy Laboratories, Inc. may be subcontracted lo other certified lab0ralor1es In order to complete the analysis reque5led. This seives as notice of this possibility. All subcontracted data Will be clear1y notated on your analytical report. EU-COC-10/18 v.3 <D ,n 0 <D ,n Q) OJ 111 C. tc;'t@I Laboratories LLc a member of The GEL Group INC PO Box :I0712 Cha~eston, SC29417 2040 Smge Road Cha~ eston. SC 29407 P 843.556.8171 F 843.766.1178 November 01 , 2021 _./ Ms. Kathy Weinel Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Re: Tailings Characterization Work Order: 554861 Dear Ms. Weinel: GEL Laboratories, LLC (GEL) appreciates the opportunity to provide the enclosed analytical results for the sample(s) we received on September 03, 2021. This revised data report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with GEL's standard operating procedures. Test results for NELAP or ISO 17025 accredited tests are verified to meet the requirements of those standards, with any exceptions noted. The results reported relate only to the items tested and to the sample as received by the laboratory. These results may not be reproduced except as full reports without approval by the laboratory. Copies of GEL' s accreditations and certifications can be found on our website at www .gel.com. Our policy is to provide high quality, personalized analytical services to enable you to meet your analytical needs on time every time. We trust that you will find everything in order and to your satisfaction. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (843) 556-8171, ext. 4289. Purchase Order: DW16l38 Enclosures Sincerely, Julie Robinson Project Manager ilHl~I IIIJlllll~lllllll 111111111 gel.com Page 2 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Tailings Characterization SDG: 554861 November 01, 2021 Laboratory Identification: GEL Laboratories LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, South Carolina 29407 (843) 556-8171 Summary: Receipt Narrative for Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. SDG: 554861 Sample receipt: The samples arrived at GEL Laboratories LLC, Charleston, South Carolina on September 03, 2021 for analysis. The samples were delivered with proper chain of custody documentation and signatures. All sample containers arrived without any visible signs of tampering or breakage. There are no additional comments concerning sample receipt. Sa mple Identification: The laboratory received the following samples: Laboratory ID Client ID 554861001 Cell I 554861002 Slimes #2 554861003 Cell 4A 554861004 Cell 4A LDS 554861005 Cell 4B 554861006 Cell4B LDS 554861007 Cell 65 554861008 Cell 3 554861009 Trip Blank Case Narrative: Sample analyses were conducted using methodology as outlined in GEL's Standard Operating Procedures. Any technical or administrative problems during analysis, data review, and reduction are contained in the analytical case narratives in the enclosed data package. Page 3 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl The enclosed data package contains the following sections: Case Narrative, Chain of Custody, Cooler Receipt Checklist, Data Package Qualifier Definitions and data from the following fractions: GC/MS Semivolatile, GC/MS Volatile, General Chemistry and Radiochemistry. Page 4 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Julie Robinson Project Manager Sheet 1 of 1 CHAIN OF CUSTODY Samples Shipped to: Gel Laboratories Contact: Tanner Holliday ------------- Project Annual Tailings 2021 Sample ID Cell 1 Slimes#2 Cell4A Cell 4A LOS Celf 4B Cell 4B LOS Cell 65 Cell3 2040 Savage Road Ph: 435 678 4115 Charleston, SC 29407 tholliday@enerqyfuels.com Date Collected 9/1/2021 9/1/2021 9/1/2021 9/1/2021 9/1/2021 9/1/2021 9/1/2021 9/1/2021 "\/1 /Ab:Z.l Samplers Name Tanner Holliday Time Collected Laboratory Analysis Requested O'if ID Dissolved Gross Alpha, Thorium (228, 230, 232) Uranium 810 (233/234, 235/236, 238), Ra-226, specific gravity, voes, SVO s Dissolved Gross Alpha, Thorium (228, 230, 232) Uranium 835 (233/234, 235/236, 238), Ra-226, specific gravity, voes, SVO , s Dissolved ~ross Alpha, Thorium (228, 230, 232) Uranium 920 (233/234, 235/236, 238), Ra-226, specific gravity, voes, svo s Dissolved Gross Alpha, Thorium (228, 230, 232) Uranium 1 935 (233/234, 235/236, 238), Ra-226, specific gravity, voes, SVO s Dissolved Gross Alpha, Thorium (228, 230, 232) Uranium 945 (233/234, 235/236, 238}, Ra-226, specific gravity, voes, SVO Dissolved Gross Alpha, Thorium (228, 230, 232) Uranium 955 (233/234, 235/236, 238), Ra-226, specific gravity, voes, SVO Dissolyed Gross Alpha, Thorium (228, 230, 232) Uranium 810 (233/234, 235/236, 238), Ra-226, specific gravity, voes, SVO Dissolved Gross Alpha, Thorium (228, 230, 232) Uranium 905 (233/234, 235/236, 238), Ra-226, specific gravity, voes, SVO Comments: SAMPLES ARE NOT FIELD FILTERED -PLEASE FILTER UPON RECEIPT! SAMPLES ARE NOT PRESERVED -pH is as collected! See Julle Robinson for technical questions. No LOCUS UPLOAD. Methods used = same as 48866.8 Date/Time Re 9/2/20211100 Date/Time { /J/2..o'LI fOoc Relinquished By:(Signature} Date/Time Date/Time Page 5 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl I I LeJE \ Laboratories LLG .. : SAMPLEllECEIPT & REVIEW FORM .. . ;;, .. .. cui:nt: O.L!:1_/V" -z .&;; .. /,/,>rt_ & I ..· \ l SOG/AR/COC/Wor'~ On!tr. .. ... .. CAI ;9/J/ z.; I . . , , · ... Received U;•: Dute nocctvo:i': . ' 1 , ~~ Courier 0~1<r Fcdl:s E.,pri,u FedEx Groun1I S kid Services c~rricr and Tr~ckin: Number 1-:C-1r 7 fl/'/ C-I 9c>5 " 72 (1/ ?\ I Su•r.cctcd Hu10n! ll\fum1~llon ~ C "U Ni:t Couuu :> 100:pm 011 S.:Jnipll!.l 1101 r,uck~tl -r.iJioxUv~.:. CUl\l:.Cl \\\!?. Jt~b\ion s:.ru,, Group for funl1tr invu,is~Uan. u ;.. z 1-lit.-..-d Cl:us Ship(><d: UN::: ,\)Shin~cd "'~ DO! H=~ul!S1 ! ..... If UN2910, IJ 1hc R,~io,::1i1·< Shipn,0111 S""•oyC0111plb1111 Y<5_ No_ D) Oil.I lhc clic1U ~ij11:1i: th-=. u1nplcJ :in: to OI! / COC 1101;1:.io,1 or ~:!10'.!a;vi: s1icl:..:r.s 01"1 Q111~0cr.-cq-.:1' cli~m d,:.,is11:11iu11. /) ,,,-r? tcc.:ivc-J :u: r:tlio~Un? C) Did the RSC cl:,sily lh< ,:mples ,s M:uimum Ne, Coums Q~\5.:rv.:LI· (CJIJ~crv.:d Ceunu -·,\J-::J D;cl.:p~uncJ Cou11u,): !!'7~,/,{n,M{r / Cfouifird :,.it: R::111 1 R:1rl 2 R:ii13 -~Oo:i..-=:.ivc.? D) Ojd 11,c. c\;c•H dl!Jol\!11:11~ ,:1.1nclc.s ::i.~c h:\:!11ilous·1 ~ COC 11ot:ilio11 o:-huz.:LTLI l:ilr..l~ 011 co11t~uc.u cqu:,J clii:111 di!.Sis,1:uinn. .,,, :JI Dor Els )'tS, sc\ca H:i:onls b:lo"'· RCRA El ::lid the JISO it!i:111ify r»:.siblc ha,."\lus0I pea•i Fb.1r11n:.al.>\.: f'oi,:i.~.11 Soil ,,_;t,.!l\Oi _ll<ri,llium ·o,h<r. ::, ~ •0 ... • ~';:,mplc Receipt CrHtri:1 ;:,, z z Con1n,r111S/Q\\olln;r, (R,ijuln:J for No11•Co11fori11Jn: r1,n1s) ... SlJi~pin~ c1'n1ilincrs rccci\'cd lnt:ic,I ::incJ ~51! Che!( ,\pplic:ii'cilc: Sc::ib b,ot-c.n O.:uo:i,cid c-on1:ilnrr l:.tJl:t-t, con1:.i11c·r 01Ji:rfducr,1i,} l icolctl? /ftf .. .. Choin.of custody d,,~umcnl$ included ~~~ i:• ,\p:-~c:bl:: Cl,:n1~,;~,~ COC :, C~'r c.~i,cd \•pcft 1uclp1 -· 2 "'1th !hlpmcot? /t"'li;,;· -.,.:~ . , .. r1<i<-"':1io11 Mc•h~~ Jee P:ck: · D:y i"' Noui: O\J,,r. 2 3 S:implo. rcquirin~ ,.,Id prc;crv,ci-,11 "':JU .Nl11F,!t:lwn:s ?-' •c:t,.rdc1I in Cdsi~ Tll:Ml': I witl,in (0 «: 6 de!!. CJ?• / ? _, -·-kt1,.. Ttn1pc,0111rc Devi« S<rral II:__..(. ' / /A . Doily ehc<k perlorrn:d onc1 possod 011 IR ~T?J:, ~ lcr:,por,~,rc i,un? I _,.iii · S~.:omJ.vy T i:mptnlu1~ Oi:vic:. S.:1faJ ;: (lt A1Jli~bl.:$, 111 r=•"~ ,,r,f<:bl<: S.::.b b11,1h111 O:n11&=d 1:oru;:,'lnc: ~:,t~1c co,,1:incr Olli.:r (\JUCTilsd S.::.n,J>lc c:>nta.inerJ int:u:I :i~d u::ilcd'J ·•"tr,,' s ,l1f: .. : ., S:amplct r-:..quidng chcmic:i:i prc:.1cr-.·:1th:m ·0 . S::111,r,L: ID"J :,,d Ca11Uln;r1 .\ri'ct1cC.:; .. .. G .. 01 pro;,cr pH? . / .. U rC\!,.:n.-.lJori :,,JJ,:d, L:.•JU: ~-• i . ' . l. $a II Yu."'' £11:orc, Qt s';il Kl11 p,os.:111 (or ,olitls? Yes 'No • NAV {lf)..:..s. L"lk.c 10 VO;\ Fn:1.."'t.;;r)·, · I Di.> :iu.{l.::lmpic, rC"luirc:. \l,Jl:11ilc nr~-Oo fir,uW VCA vf:Js u,1u:U11 .:u:itf ff.::S'i:.n•J.11011? Ycs:il:'• N;z_' NA (If u11l:11Q\\1', lckn No) ,. J :~J .,r o 7 At< 1:qul~ \'0,\·vl:ols fo<c or ho:~>i>=«1 Ye,_ No~ ~"--Aiml)•Si,? ~j ,. S,u1111t. IC''1 J.n-! :o,n:ih:..:,, Jlo:,_~ '""~ b\;..L 0 -·~'-\_..__.,.,l...n~c...1.. ~ q~\ l ;:f.,! . .. : .. lD", :.nJ tc.n:i :1ir,c1~d: • .... .., · ~ro~,.~, 8 s~n,pks rccoh•ed wi1hin holding 1im~·1 I✓ 1;.f:..:J .:. ·!,11 ' 1s~mplc !O's on COC rr.:11d1 ID'1 on • ~fJ lO"s :nd t{'l1.L1i,,!r.; »'li:a~J.: ... 9 bonlc.? . iv :'{~ ~,:' '·· \D•I~ & 1ir.x: on COC rn:11eh d,ic & 1imc Clrcl.: A(lplic,.\11~.: No c!.,1t1 on co111:ilncrJ No Unlc.s en C'0111:Um:rs COC·mhsius inro Cil"r(do:.scrib.:) lO on bonlc,? V Number or Cllnt~ocr1 rctcil•cd m:,li:h v , Cir::lc ).pplle>b\~: No co111~iu..:r c0u111 0,1,COC 0,1,., (d«cnb.:) 11 m,mbcr i11dico1cd llD COC'! ~,:~· ll Arc s:omplc tontoinori idooli r.:obln 01 'Y I (LQ}._ ~ '-'¼>~., {ki-¼bl~ c:s,S \)\'J ~.-. GEL o,;,"ldcd bl' 111c ll( GEL lo~i:I;? ~~ COC (.irrn i1 pr1'pcrly 1i~ncd in Chelc ,\ppllciblo: ~ot ~U11'l1"k1hcd C\h<r_(d,,d~) ~ ~- 13 v :~ : rdinquishcd/rcceivcd 1cttion11 Ccmmctus (U.1e Co,ulnu,uou form tr nc~didl: - I. ' PM (or PMA) 11:vi•"~ l11i1i:1Js. N \::( y< D>1~ '-1 l71ZJ _ Po~~ I of _J_ Gl·CHL·SR-O!ll P.ev 7 .. Page 6 of 116 SDG. 554861 Revl GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report GEL Work Order/SDG: 554861 Client SDG: 554861 Annual Tailings 2021 Project Manager: Project Name: Purchase Order: Package Level: EDD Format: Julie Robinson DNMI00107 Tailings Characterization DW16138 LEVEL3 EIM_DNMI Collect GELID Client Sample ID Client Sample Desc. Date & Time 554861001 Cell 1 554861002 Slimes #2 554861003 Cell4A 554861004 Cell 4A LDS 554861005 Ce114B 554861006 Cell4B LDS 554861007 Cell 65 554861008 Cell 3 554861009 Trip Blank Client Sample ID -001 Cell 1 -002 Slimes #2 Status Tests/Methods REVW ASTM D 5057 Specific Gravity REVW Rad 2 Aliquot for distribution throughout the lab REVW Alphaspec Th, Liquid REVW U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 REVW GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Liquid REVW Lucas Cell, Ra226, liquid REVW Laboratory Composite REVW BNA Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) Search REVW SW846 3510C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) REVW VOA Library Search Liquid REVW SW846 8260 Volatiles REVW ASTM D 5057 Specific Gravity REVW Rad 2 Aliquot for distribution throughout the lab REVW Alphaspec Th, Liquid REVW U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 REVW GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, 01-SEP-21 08:10 01-SEP-21 08:35 01-SEP-21 09:20 01-SEP-21 09:35 01-SEP-21 09:45 01-SEP-21 09:55 01-SEP-21 08:10 01-SEP-21 09:05 01-SEP-21 08:10 Product Reference U-233/234,U- 235/236 Gross Alpha RAD2 U-233/234,U- 235/236 Gross Alpha Work Order Due Date: 04-OCT-21 Package Due Date: EDD Due Date: Due Date: JAR1 Receive Time # of Date & Time Zone Cont. 03-SEP-21 10:00 -2 5 03-SEP-21 10:00 -2 5 03-SEP-21 10:00 -2 5 03-SEP-21 10:00 -2 5 03-SEP-21 10:00 -2 5 03-SEP-21 10:00 -2 5 03-SEP-21 10:00 -2 5 03-SEP-21 10:00 -2 5 03-SEP-21 10:00 -2 3 Fax Date PM Comments 01-OCT-21 04-OCT-21 04-OCT-21 Lab Matrix WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER Handle these samples carefully, they are low pH with high metals. Samples are not preserved. Handle these samples carefully, they are low pH with high metals. Samples are not preserved. Report Date: 01-NOV-21 Work Order: 554861 Page 1 of 9 Collector: C Prelogin #: 202008114643 Project Workdef ID: 1330584 SDG Status: Closed Logged by: Fax Days to Due Date Process CofC# Prelog Lab Field Group QC QC 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 2 Aux Data y Receive Codes RAD2 -> ~ -I.O 00 -s:1-lr) Ir) ci Cl RAD2 r.rJ I.O --<+-< 0 t"-- Q) ~ 0... GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report Liquid REVW Lucas Cell, Ra226, liquid REVW Laboratory Composite RAD2 REVW BNA Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) Search REVW SW846 3510C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) REVW VOA Library Search Liquid REVW SW846 8260 Volatiles -003 Cell 4A REVW ASTM D 5057 Specific Gravity REVW Rad 2 Aliquot for distribution throughout the lab REVW Alphaspec Th, Liquid REVW U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 U-233/234,U- 235/236 REVW GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Gross Alpha Liquid REVW Lucas Cell, Ra226, liquid REVW Laboratory Composite RAD2 REVW BNA Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) Search REVW SW846 3510C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) REVW VOA Library Search Liquid REVW SW846 8260 Volatiles -004 Cell 4A LDS REVW ASTM D 5057 Specific Gravity REVW Rad 2 Aliquot for distribution throughout the lab REVW Alphaspec Th, Liquid REVW U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 U-233/234,U- 235/236 REVW GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Gross Alpha Liquid REVW Lucas Cell, Ra226, liquid REVW Laboratory Composite RAD2 REVW BNA Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) Search REVW SW846 3510C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) REVW VOA Library Search Liquid REVW SW846 8260 Volatiles -005 Cell 4B REVW ASTM D 5057 Specific Gravity REVW Rad 2 Aliquot for distribution throughout the lab REVW Alphaspec Th, Liquid REVW u-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 U-233/234,U- 235/236 REVW GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Gross Alpha Liquid REVW Lucas Cell, Ra226, liquid Handle these samples carefully, they are low pH with high metals. Samples are not preserved. Handle these samples carefully, they are low pH with high metals. Samples are not preserved. Handle these samples carefully, they are low pH with high metals. Samples are not preserved. Report Date: 01-NOV-21 Work Order: 554861 Page 2 of 9 RAD2 RAD2 ....... ;;> (I) ~ ....... \0 00 "'1" lr) lr) RAD2 0 0 ifJ \0 ....... ....... 4-< 0 00 (I) O[) ro p.. GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report REVW Laboratory Composite RAD2 REVW BNA Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) Search REVW SW846 3510C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) REVW VOA Library Search Liquid REVW SW846 8260 Volatiles -006 Cell 4B LDS REVW ASTM D 5057 Specific Gravity REVW Rad 2 Aliquot for distribution throughout the lab REVW Alphaspec Th, Liquid REVW U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 U-233/234,U- 235/236 REVW GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Gross Alpha Liquid REVW Lucas Cell, Ra226, liquid REVW Laboratory Composite RAD2 REVW BNA Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) Search REVW SW846 3510C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) REVW VOA Library Search Liquid REVW SW846 8260 Volatiles -007 Cell 65 REVW ASTM D 5057 Specific Gravity REVW Rad 2 Aliquot for distribution throughout the lab REVW Alphaspec Th, Liquid REVW U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 U-233/234,U- 235/236 REVW GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Gross Alpha Liquid REVW Lucas Cell, Ra226, liquid REVW Laboratory Composite RAD2 REVW BNA Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) Search REVW SW846 3510C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) REVW VOA Library Search Liquid REVW SW846 8260 Volatiles -008 Cell 3 REVW ASTM D 5057 Specific Gravity REVW Rad 2 Aliquot for distribution throughout the lab REVW Alphaspec Th, Liquid REVW U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 U-233/234,U- 235/236 REVW GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Gross Alpha Liquid REVW Lucas Cell, Ra226, liquid REVW Laboratory Composite RAD2 REVW BNA Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) Search Handle these samples carefully, they are low pH with high metals. Samples are not preserved. Handle these samples carefully, they are low pH with high metals. Samples are not preserved. Handle these samples carefully, they are low pH with high metals. Samples are not preserved. Report Date: 01-NOV-21 Work Order: 554861 Page 3 of 9 RAD2 RAD2 ...... ;>- Q) ~ ...... \0 RAD2 ~ 1./") 1./") ci Cl CZl \0 ,......, ....... '-H 0 O'\ Q) on e<:$ i:i.. GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report -009 Trip Blank REVW SW846 3510C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) REVW VOA Library Search Liquid REVW SW846 8260 Volatiles REVW SW846 8260 Volatiles Product: VOA8260_L Workdef ID: 1542350 Method: SW846 8260D Product Description: SW846 8260 Volatiles In Product Group? No Samples: 001,002, 003,004,005,006,007, 008,009 Pannname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly CAS# 17060-07-0 3855-82-1 78-93-3 67-64-1 71-43-2 460-00-4 56-23-5 3114-55-4 67-66-3 74-87-3 462-06-6 75-09-2 91-20-3 109-99-9 108-88-3 2037-26-5 1330-20-7 Parmname 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 2-Butanone Acetone Benzene Bromofluorobenzene Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene-d5 Chloroform Chloromethane Fluorobenzene Methylene chloride Naphthalene Tetrahydrofuran Toluene Toluene-dB Xylenes (total) Handle these samples carefully, they are low pH with high metals. Samples are not preserved. Group Name: Client RDL or PQL & Unit 50 ug/L 4000 700 5 50 ug/L 5 70 30 5 100 46 1000 50 ug/L 10000 Reporting Units ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L Report Date: 01-NOV-21 Work Order: 554861 Page 4 of 9 Group Reference: Path: 8260D Unpreserved (7d HT) Product Reference: Moisture Correction: "As Received" Parm Included Included Custom Function in Sample? in QC? List? SURR y y No IS y y REG y y REG y y REG y y SURR y y REG y y IS y y REG y y REG y y IS y y REG y y REG y y REG y y REG y y SURR y y REG y y -> t1) ~ -\0 00 -::t" V) ci Cl 00 \0 --4-, 0 0 -t1) gi p.. GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report Product: MSDTIC_L Workdef ID: 1508377 In Product Group? No Method: Product Description: BNA Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) Search Samples: 001,002, 003,004,005,006,007, 008 Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly CAS# Parmname TIC Product: ASP_ THL WorkdeflD: 1371096 In Product Group? No Method: DOE EML HASL-300, Th-01-RC Modified Product Description: Alphaspec Th, Liquid Samples: 001 , 002, 003, 004, 005, 006, 007, 008 Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly CAS# 14274-82-9 14269-63-7 7440-29-1 Parmname Thorium-228 Thorium-230 Thorium-232 Product: ASP _UUL Workdef ID: 1371097 In Product Group? No Method: DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified Product Description: U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 Samples: 001,002,003, 004,005,006,007, 008 Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly CAS# Parmname 13968-55-3/13966-. Uranium-233/234 15117-96-1/13982-Uranium-235/236 7440-61-1 Uranium-238 Product: GFCTORAL Workdef ID: 1371098 Method: EPA 903.0 Product Description: GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Liquid Samples: 001,002,003,004,005,006,007,008 Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly CAS# Parmname Gross Radium Alpha In Product Group? No Group Name: Client RDL or POL& Unit Group Name: Client RDL or PQL & Unit Group Name: Client RDL or POL& Unit Group Name: Client RDL or POL & Unit Reporting Units ug/L Reporting Units pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L Reporting Units pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L Reporting Units pCi/L Report Date: 01-NOV-21 Work Order: 554861 Page 5 of 9 Group Reference: Path: 8270D EXPIRED Product Reference: Moisture Correction: "As Received" Parm Included Included Custom Function in Sample? in QC? List? IS y y No Group Reference: Path: High Rad Product Reference: Moisture Correction: "As Received" Parm Included Included Custom Function in Sample? in QC? List? REG REG REG y y y y y y No Group Reference: Path: High Rad Product Reference: U-233/234,U-235/236 Moisture Correction: "As Received" Parm Included Included Custom Function in Sample? in QC? List? REG REG REG y y y y y y No Group Reference: Path: High Rad Product Reference: Gross Alpha Moisture Correction: "As Received" Parm Included Included Custom Function in Sample? in QC? List? REG y y No -;:,. ~ \.0 00 -.::I'" tn tn ci a cr.:i \.0 --c..,. ..... ..... (1.) ~ i:i... GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report Product: LUC26RAL WorkdeflO: 1371099 In Product Group? No Group Name: Method: EPA 903.1 Modified Product Description: Lucas Cell, Ra226, liquid Samples: 001 ,002,003,004,005,006,007, 008 Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly Client ROL or CAS# Parmname PQL& Unit 13982-63-3 Radium-226 Product: LABCOMP _L Workdef ID: 1371213 In Product Group? No Group Name: Method: Product Description: Laboratory Composite Samples: 001 ,002,003,004,005,006,007,008 Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly Client ROL or CAS# Parmname PQL & Unit Product: MSD1 0C70DL Workdef 10: 1508378 In Product Group? No Group Name: Method: SW846 3510C/8270D Product Description: SW846 3510C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) Samples: 001,002, 003,004,005,006,007, 008 Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly Client RDL or CAS# Parmname PQL & Unit 120-82-1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 10 ug/L 95-50-1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 10 ug/L 122-66-7 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine 10 ug/L 541-73-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 10 ug/L 106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 10 ug/L 3855-82-1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 90-12-0 1-Methylnaphthalene 1 ug/L 95-95-4 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 10 ug/L 118-79-6 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 10 ug/L 88-06-2 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 10 ug/L 120-83-2 2,4-Dichlorophenol 10 ug/L 105-67-9 2,4-Dimethylphenol 10 ug/L 51-28-5 2,4-Dinitrophenol 20 ug/L 121-14-2 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 10 ug/L Reporting Units pCi/L Reporting Units Reporting Units ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L Report Date: 01-NOV-21 Work Order: 554861 Page 6 of 9 Group Reference: Path: High Rad Product Reference: Moisture Correction: "As Received" Parm Included Included Custom Function in Sample? in QC? List? REG y y No Group Reference: Path: High Rad Product Reference: RAD2 Moisture Correction: "As Received" Parm Included Included Custom Function in Sample? in QC? List? 0 Group Reference: Path: SW846 3510C/8270D EXPIRED Product Reference: Moisture Correction: "As Received" Parm Included Included Custom Function in Sample? in QC? List? REG y y No REG y y REG y y REG y y REG y y IS y y REG y y REG y y SURR y y REG y y REG y y REG y y REG y y REG y y ......, > Cl.> e:::: ,...... \0 00 ,:;t- V) V) C'.J 0 r/) \0 ...... ...... 4-< 0 N ...... Cl.> 00 ro 0.. GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report Report Date: 01-NOV-21 Work Order: 554861 Page 7 of 9 606-20-2 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y 91-58-7 2-Chloronaphthalene 1 ug/L ug/L REG y y 95-57-8 2-Chlorophenol 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y 321-60-8 2-Fluorobiphenyl 10 ug/L ug/L SURR y y 367-12-4 2-Fluorophenol 10 ug/L ug/L SURR y y 534-52-1 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y 91-57-6 2-Methylnaphthalene 1 ug/L ug/L REG y y 88-75-5 2-Nitrophenol 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y 119-93-7 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y 101-55-3 4-Bromophenylphenylether 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y 59-50-7 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y 7005-72-3 4-Chlorophenylphenylether 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y 100-02-7 4-Nitrophenol 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y 83-32-9 Acenaphthene 1 ug/L ug/L REG y y 15067-26-2 Acenaphthene-d10 ug/L IS y y 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene 1 ug/L ug/L REG y y 120-12-7 Anthracene 1 ug/L ug/L REG y y 92-87-5 Benzidine 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y 56-55-3 Benzo(a)anthracene 1 ug/L ug/L REG y y 50-32-8 Benzo(a)pyrene 1 ug/L ug/L REG y y 205-99-2 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 ug/L ug/L REG y y 191-24-2 Benzo(ghi)perylene 1 ug/L ug/L REG y y 207-08-9 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1 ug/L ug/L REG y y 85-68-7 Butylbenzylphthalate 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y 218-01-9 Chrysene 1 ug/L ug/L REG y y ..... > 1719-03-5 Chrysene-d12 ug/L IS y y ~ 84-74-2 Di-n-butylphthalate 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y ..... 117-84-0 Di-n-octylphthalate 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y \0 00 y y "1" 53-70-3 Dibenzo( a, h )anthracene 1 ug/L ug/L REG tr) tr) 84-66-2 Diethylphthalate 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y ci 131-11-3 Dimethylphthalate 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y Q 122-39-4 Diphenylamine 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y 00 206-44-0 Fluoranthene 1 ug/L ug/L REG y y \0 ..... 86-73-7 Fluorene 1 ug/L ug/L REG y y ..... 4--, 118-74-1 Hexachlorobenzene 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y 0 87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y ~ ...... Q) bO c,:j 0-. GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report 77-47-4 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 67-72-1 Hexachloroethane 193-39-5 lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 78-59-1 lsophorone 62-75-9 N-Methyl-N-nitrosomethylamine 621-64-7 N-Nitrosodipropylamine 91-20-3 Naphthalene 1146-65-2 Naphthalene-dB 98-95-3 Nitrobenzene 4165-60-0 Nitrobenzene-d5 87-86-5 Pentachlorophenol 1520-96-3 Perylene-d12 85-01-8 Phenanthrene 1517-22-2 Phenanthrene-d10 108-95-2 Phenol 4165-62-2 Phenol-d5 129-00-0 Pyrene 110-86-1 Pyridine 108-60-1 bis(2-Chloro-1-methylethyl)ether 111-91-1 bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 111-44-4 bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether 117-81-7 bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 65794-96-9 m,p-Cresols 95-48-7 o-Cresol 1718-51-0 p-Terphenyl-d14 Product: MISSGAS_L Workdef ID: 1370067 Method: ASTM D 5057 Product Description: ASTM D 5057 Specific Gravity Samples: 001 , 002,003,004, 005, 006,007,008 Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly CAS# Parmname Specific Gravity In Product Group? No 10 ug/L 10 ug/L 1 ug/L 10 ug/L 10 ug/L 10 ug/L 1 ug/L 10 ug/L 10 ug/L 10 ug/L 1 ug/L 10 ug/L 10 ug/L 1 ug/L 10 ug/L 10 ug/L 10 ug/L 10 ug/L 1 ug/L 10 ug/L 10 ug/L 10 ug/L Group Name: Client RDL or PQL & Unit .1 none Report Date: 01-NOV-21 Work Order: 554861 Page 8 of 9 ug/L REG y y ug/L REG y y ug/L REG y y ug/L REG y y ug/L REG y y ug/L REG y y ug/L REG y y ug/L IS y y ug/L REG y y ug/L SURR y y ug/L REG y y ug/L IS y y ug/L REG y y ug/L IS y y ug/L REG y y ug/L SURR y y ug/L REG y y ug/L REG y y ug/L REG y y ug/L REG y y ug/L REG y y ug/L REG y y ug/L REG y y ug/L REG y y ug/L SURR y y ..... > Group Reference: ~ Path: Standard ..... IO Product Reference: 00 'q" Moisture Correction: "As Received" tr) tr) Reporting Parm Included Included Custom 0 Units Function in Sample? in QC? List? 0 --r:n none REG y y No IO _. ..... '-+--< 0 'q" ..... (J.) co ro 0.., GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report Product: RADALQT_L WorkdeflD: 1371095 In Product Group? No Method: Product Description: Rad 2 Aliquot for distribution throughout the lab Samples: 001 , 002, 003,004, 005,006, 007,008 Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly CAS# Parmname Product: VOATIC_L Workdef ID: 1542348 Method: Product Description: VOA Library Search Liquid Samples: 001 , 002,003,004,005,006,007,008 Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly CAS# Parmname In Product Group? No Action Product Name Description Contingent Tests Login Requirements: Requirement Group Name: Client RDL or PQL& Unit Group Name: Client RDL or PQL & Unit Samples Group Reference: Report Date: 01-NOV-21 Work Order: 554861 Page 9 of 9 Path: Standard Product Reference: Moisture Correction: "As Received" Reporting Parm Included Included Custom Units Function in Sample? in QC? List? Group Reference: 0 Path: TIC 82600 Standard Product Reference: Moisture Correction: "As Received" Reporting Parm Included Included Custom Units Function in Sample? in QC? List? 0 Include? Comments -> 11) ~ - 00 v t.r) V) Peer Review by: ____________ _ Work Order (SDG#), PO# Checked? ____ _ C of C signed in receiver location? ______ g r/) \0 ...... -C...; 0 V) -11) ~ P.. List of current GEL Certifications as ofOl November 2021 State Certification Alabama 42200 Alaska 17-018 Alaska Drinking Water SC00012 Arkansas 88-0651 CUA 4200904046 California 2940 Colorado SC00012 Connecticut PH-0169 DoD ELAP/ JSOl 7025 A2LA 2567.01 Florida NELAP E87156 Foreign Soils Permit P330-15-00283,P330-15-00253 Georgia SC00012 Georgia SOWA 967 Hawaii SC00012 Idaho SC00012 Illinois NELAP 200029 Indiana C-SC-01 Kansas NELAP E-10332 Kentucky SOWA 90129 Kentucky Wastewater 90129 Louisiana Drinking Water LA024 Louisiana NELAP 03046 (AI33904) Maine 2019020 Maryland 270 Massachusetts M-SC0l2 Massachusetts PF AS Approv Letter Michigan 9976 Mississippi SC00012 Nebraska NE-OS-26-13 Nevada SC000 12202 I-I New Hampshire NELAP 2054 New Jersey NELAP SC002 New Mexico SC000l2 New York NELAP 11501 North Carolina 233 North Carolina SOWA 45709 North Dakota R-158 Oklahoma 2019-165 Pennsylvania NELAP 68-00485 Puerto Rico SC00012 S. Carolina Radiochem 10120002 Sanitation Districts of L 9255651 South Carolina Chemistry 10120001 Tennessee TN 02934 TexasNELAP T104704235-21-19 UtahNELAP SC000122021-36 Vermont VT87156 Virginia NELAP 460202 Washington C780 Page 16 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GC/MS Volatile Technical Case Narrative Energy Fuels Resources SDG #: 554861 Product: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) by Gas Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer Analytical Method: SW846 8260D Analvtical Procedure: GL-OA-E-038 REV# 28 Analytical Batch: 2171666 The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s). GEL Sample ID# 554861001 554861002 554861003 554861004 554861005 554861006 554861007 554861008 554861009 1204905488 1204905489 1204905490 1204905491 1204911399 1204911400 Client ample Identification Cell I Slimes #2 Cell 4A Cell 4A LDS Cell 4B Cell 4B LDS Cell 65 Cell 3 Trip Blank Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) Method Blank (MB) 554760004(NonSDG) Post Spike (PS) 554760004(NonSDG) Post Spike Duplicate (PSD) Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) Method Blank (MB) The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis. Data Summary: All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable, with the following exceptions. Technical Information Sample Dilutions/Methanol Dilutions Samples 1204905490 (Non SDG 554760004PS), 1204905491 (Non SDG 554760004PSD), 554861001 (Cell l), 554861002 (Slimes #2), 554861003 (Cell 4A), 554861004 (Cell 4A LDS), 554861005 (Cell 4B), 554861006 (Cell 4B LDS), 554861007 (Cell 65) and 554861008 (Cell 3) were analyzed at 5X dilutions at the request of the client. SS4861 Analyte 001 002 003 004 oos 006 007 008 J ,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 2-Butanone 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X Acetone 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X Benzene 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X Carbon tetrachloride 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X Chlorobenzene-d5 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X Page 17 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Chlorofonn 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X Chloromethane 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X Fluorobenzene 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X Methylene chloride 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X Naphthalene 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X Tetrahydrofuran 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X Toluene 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X Xylenes (total) 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X 5X Sample Re-extraction/Re-analysis Sample 554861001 (Cell I) was re-analyzed due to unacceptable surrogate or internal standard recoveries in the initial analysis. The re-analyses confirmed/and or passed and were reported. Miscellaneous Information TIC Comment Tentatively identified compounds (TIC) may be requested for samples 554861001 (Cell I), 554861002 (Slimes #2), 554861003 (Cell 4A), 554861004 (Cell 4A LDS), 554861005 (Cell 4B), 554861006 (Cell 4B LDS), 554861007 (Cell 65), 554861008 (Cell 3) and 554861009 (Trip Blank) in this delivery group/work order. Please note that non-requested calibrated analytes detected in a client sample may be reported on the Form I/Certificate of Analysis as TICs. TIC data, ifrequested, were included on the Sample Data Summary (Form 1) and included with the sample raw data. Certification tatement Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative. Page 18 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Qualifier Definition Report for DNMIO0l Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Client SDG: 554861 GEL Work Order: 554861 The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows: * A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria ** Analyte is a surrogate compound U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL. DL Indicates that sample is diluted. RA Indicates that sample is re-analyzed without re-extraction. RE Indicates that sample is re-extracted. Review/Validation GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data reviewer. In addition, all CLP-like deliverables receive a third level review of the fractional data package. The following data validator verified the information presented in this data report: Signature: ~ H ~ Name: Erin Haubert Date: 01 NOV 2021 Title: Data Validator Page 19 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com QC Summary Report Date: November 1, 2021 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Page 1 of 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel Workorder: 554861 Parm name NOM S.a_!!!.~ Qua I C Units RPD% REC% Range Anlst Date Time ---- Volatile-GC/MS 3atch 2171666 ------------ QC1204905488 LCS 2-Butanone 250 232 ug/L 93 (58%-138%) JEB 09/08/21 10:0 Acetone 250 229 ug/L 92 (53%-151%) Benzene 50.0 49.l ug/L 98 (74%-118%) Carbon tetrachloride 50.0 55.0 ug/L 110 (73%-140%) Chloroform 50.0 50.0 ug/L 100 (77%-126%) Chloromethane 50.0 49.8 ug/L 100 (60%-139%) Methylene chloride 50.0 48.2 ug/L 96 (69%-120%) Naphthalene 50.0 45.7 ug/L 91 (70%-128%) Toluene 50.0 46.9 ug/L 94 (74%-118%) Xylenes (total) 150 143 ug/L 95 (72%-126%) 1,2-Dich loroethane-d4 50.0 55.3 ug/L 111 (73%-129%) Bromofluorobenzene 50.0 49.3 ug/L 99 (72%-125%) Toluene-d8 50.0 53.2 ug/L 106 (75%-123%) Page 29 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com QC Summar! Workorder: 554861 Page 2 of Parmname NOM SamJ>le Qual QC _ Units RPO% REC% Ran e Anlst Date Time Volatile-GC/MS 3atch 2171666 QC1204911399 LCS 2-Butanone 250 236 ug/L 94 (58%-138%) JEB 09/09/21 09:2 Acetone 250 234 ug/L 94 (53%-151%) Benzene 50.0 51.2 ug/L 102 (74%-118%) Carbon tetrachloride 50.0 58.5 ug/L 117 (73%-140%) Chloroform 50.0 53.7 ug/L 107 (77%-126%) Chloromethane 50.0 62.0 ug/L 124 (60%-139%) Methylene chloride 50.0 51.8 ug/L 104 (69%-120%) Naphthalene 50.0 45.9 ug/L 92 (70%-128%) Toluene 50.0 48.8 ug/L 98 (74%-118%) Xylenes (total) 150 149 ug/L 99 (72%-126%) 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 50.0 54.9 ug/L 110 (73%-129%) Bromofluorobenzene 50.0 47.6 ug/L 95 (72%-125%) Toluene-d8 50.0 52.0 ug/L 104 (75%-123%) QCl204905489 MB 2-Butanone u 1.67 ug/L 09/08/21 11 :4, Acetone u 1.74 ug/L Page 30 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407-(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 554861 Page 3 of ---Parmname NOM Sample ual Q..C Units RPO% REC% Rane Anlst Date Time Volatile-GC/MS 3atch 2171666 Benzene u 0.333 ug/L JEB 09/08/21 11 : 4, Carbon tetrachloride u 0.333 ug/L Chloroform u 0.333 ug/L Chloromethane u 0.333 ug/L Methylene chloride u 0.500 ug/L Naphthalene u 0.333 ug/L Tetrahydrofuran u 1.67 ug/L Toluene u 0.333 ug/L Xylenes (total) u 1.00 ug/L 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 50.0 52.0 ug/L 104 (73%-129%) Bromofluorobenzene 50.0 47.6 ug/L 95 (72%-125%) Toluene-d8 50.0 53.2 ug/L 106 (75%-123%) QCl204911400 MB 2-Butanone u 1.67 ug/L 09/09/21 12:0 Acetone u 1.74 ug/L Benzene u 0.333 ug/L ' Page31 ofl16 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com QC Summarl'. Workorder: 554861 Page 4 of Parmname NOM Sam(lle Q_ual _QC Units RPD% REC% Ran e Anlst Date Time ---- Volatile-GC/MS 3atch 2171666 Carbon tetrachloride u 0.333 ug/L JEB 09/09/21 12:0 Chloroform u 0.333 ug/L Chloromethane u 0.333 ug/L Methylene chloride u 0.500 ug/L Naphthalene u 0.333 ug/L Tetrahydrofuran u 1.67 ug/L Toluene u 0.333 ug/L Xylenes (total) u 1.00 ug/L l ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 50.0 49.9 ug/L 100 (73%-129%) Bromofluorobenzene 50.0 48.2 ug/L 96 (72%-125%) Toluene-d8 50.0 53.5 ug/L 107 (75%-123%) QC1204905490 554760004 PS 2-Butanone 250 u 4000 232 ug/L 93 (38%-137%) 09/08/21 20:2, Acetone 250 u 700 235 ug/L 93 (47%-140%) Benzene 50.0 u 5.00 51.3 ug/L 103 (65%-122%) Carbon tetrachloride 50.0 u 5.00 54.8 ug/L 110 (63%-144%) Page 32 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 554861 Page 5 of -----Parmname NOM Sam C Units RPD% REC% Ran e Anlst Date Time ------- Volatile-GC/MS 3atch 2171666 Chloroform 50.0 u 70.0 53.0 ug/L 106 (69%-133%) JEB 09/08/21 20:2• Chloromethane 50.0 u 30.0 44.7 ug/L 89 (45%-142%) Methylene chloride 50.0 u 5.00 51.3 ug/L 103 (62%-125%) Naphthalene 50.0 u 100 45.9 ug/L 92 (61%-134%) Toluene 50.0 u 1000 48.5 ug/L 97 (63%-121%) Xylenes (total) 150 u 10000 147 ug/L 98 (52%-132%) l ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 50.0 55.3 56.l ug/L 112 (73%-129%) Bromofluorobenzene 50.0 48.3 51.0 ug/L 102 (72%-125%) Toluene-d8 50.0 53.6 53.8 ug/L 108 (75%-123%) QC1204905491 554760004 PSD 2-Butanone 250 u 4000 246 ug/L 6 99 (0%-20%) 09/08/21 20:5 Acetone 250 u 700 249 ug/L 6 99 (0%-20%) Benzene 50.0 u 5.00 54.5 ug/L 6 109 (0%-20%) Carbon tetrachloride 50.0 u 5.00 59.4 ug/L 8 119 (0%-20%) Chloroform 50.0 u 70.0 56.7 ug/L 7 113 (0%-20%) Chloromethane 50.0 u 30.0 51.4 ug/L 14 103 (0%-20%) Page 33 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com QC Summar:y Workorder: 554861 Parmname NOM Sam~Qual ~ Units RPO% Volatile-GC/MS 3atch 2171666 Methylene chloride 50.0 Naphthalene 50.0 Toluene 50.0 Xylenes (total) 150 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 50.0 Bromofluorobenzene 50.0 Toluene-d8 50.0 Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows: ** < > Analyte is a surrogate compound Result is less than value reported Result is greater than value reported V V V V The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product 5.00 55.2 ug/L 100 49.8 ug/L 1000 51.8 ug/L 10000 156 ug/L 55.3 55.3 ug/L 48.3 50.1 ug/L 53.6 53.7 ug/L A B C D E F H For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank. Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample Organics--Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range Estimated Value Analytical holding time was exceeded JNX Non Calibrated Compound M Matrix Related Failure 7 8 6 6 REC% 110 100 104 104 111 100 107 Page 6 of Rang~Anlst Date Time ---- (0%-20%) JEB 09/08/21 20:5 (0%-20%) (0%-20%) (0%-20%) (73%-129%) (72%-125%) (75%-123%) N Organics--Presumptive evidence based on mass spectral library search to make a tentative identification of the analyte (TIC). Quantitation is based on nearest internal standard response factor NIA RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply. NI See case narrative ND Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit Page 34 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com QC Sun1mary Workorder: 554861 Parmname NOM Samp~Qual QC Units RPO% RE~ Ran e Anlst Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier Page 7 of Date Time NJ p Q R u UJ X y Organics--The concentrations between the primary and confirmation columns/detectors is >40% different. For HPLC, difference is also <70% One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER. I\ h Sample results are rejected Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL. Compound cannot be extracted Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier QC Samples were not spiked with this compound RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry. Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded N/A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike cone. by a factor of 4 or more or ¾RPD not applicable. "The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater than five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of+/-the RL is used to evaluate the DUP result. * Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications. For PS, PSD, and SDIL T results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations. Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary. Page 35 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GC/MS Semivolatile Technical Case Narrative Energy Fuels Resources SDG #: 554861 Product: Analysis ofSemivolatile Organic Compounds by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry Analytical Method: SW846 3510C/8270D Analytical Procedure: GL-OA-E-009 REV# 45 Analytical Batch: 2171562 Preparation Method: SW846 3510C Preparation Procedure: GL-OA-E-013 REV# 35 Preparation Batch: 2171561 The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s). Client Sample Identification Cell l Slimes #2 Cell 4A Cell 4A LDS Cell 4B Cell 4B LDS Cell 65 Cell 3 Method Blank (MB) Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) GEL Sample ID# 554861001 554861002 554861003 554861004 554861005 554861006 554861007 554861008 1204905319 1204905320 1204905321 Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate (LCSD) The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis. Data Summary: All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable, with the following exceptions. Quality Control (OC) Information Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate (LCSD) An LCSD was used in place of matrix QC due to limited sample volume. LCS/LCSD Relative Percent Difference (RPD) Statement The RPD values between the LCS and LCSD (See Below) did not meet the acceptance limits for one or more analytes. Since the individual LCS and LCSD recoveries for these analytes were within the established acceptance criteria, the failures did not adversely impact the reported data. Sample Analyte Value 1204905320 (LCS) and 1204905321 (LCSD) Benzidine RPD 46* (0%-30%) Page 36 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Technical Information Sample Re-extraction/Re-analysis Samples 554861001 (Cell I), 554861005 (Cell 4B) and 554861007 (Cell 65) contained detects of Pyridine just above the LOQ. The daily CCV passed acceptance criteria for Pyridine; however, the ICY was biased high for this analyte. The samples were re-extracted out of holding and analyzed on an instrument with passing ICY and CCV. The Pyridine results were confirmed. The initial data results were reported. Miscellaneous Information Additional Comments Diphenylamine Statement Diphenylamine has now superseded N-Nitroso-diphenylamine as a CCC in EPA Method 8270C. Previous versions of EPA Method 8270 (prior to 8270C) listed N-Nitroso-diphenylamine as a CCC. However, as stated in EPA Method 8270C, Revision 3, December, 1996, Section 1.4.5, "N-Nitroso-diphenylamine decomposes in the gas chromatographic inlet and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine." Studies of these two compounds at GEL, both independent of each other and together, show that they not only coelute, but also have similar mass spectra. The GEL Mobile Lab will report N-Nitroso-diphenylamine and Diphenylamine as N-Nitroso-diphenylamine on all reports and forms. Certification Statement Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative. Page 37 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Qualifier Definition Report for DNMIO0l Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Client SDG: 554861 GEL Work Order: 554861 The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows: * A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria ** Analyte is a surrogate compound B For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank. U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL. h Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded DL Indicates that sample is diluted. RA Indicates that sample is re-analyzed without re-extraction. RE Indicates that sample is re-extracted. ReviewNalidation GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data reviewer. In addition, all CLP-like deliverables receive a third level review of the fractional data package. The following data validator verified the information presented in this data report: Signature: QQ.r"'kvtO'l P.:, ~er, Date: 24 SEP 2021 Page 38 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Name: Cameron Bearden Title: Group Leader GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com QC Summary Reoort Date: September 24, 2021 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Page I of 1 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel Workorder: 554861 Parmname NOM Sample C Units RPO% REC% Rang~ Anlst Date Time --- ;;emi-Volatile-GC/MS 3atch 2171562 QC1204905320 LCS 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 50.0 33.0 ug/L 66 (43%-105%) NMl 09/09/21 13:J 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 50.0 31.5 ug/L 63 (40%-92%) 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine 50.0 35.7 ug/L 71 (50%-111%) 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 50.0 30.4 ug/L 61 (40%-89%) 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 50.0 30.7 ug/L 61 (42%-92%) 1-Methylnaphthalene 50.0 38.1 ug/L 76 (50%-11]%) 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 50.0 37.2 ug/L 74 (58%-137%) 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 50.0 36.0 ug/L 72 (60%-127%) 2,4-Dichlorophenol 50.0 34.2 ug/L 68 (58%-119%) 2,4-Dimethylphenol 50.0 27.9 ug/L 56 (46%-99%) 2,4-Dinitrophenol 50.0 59.6 ug/L II9 (28%-151%) 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 50.0 44.1 ug/L 88 (55%-134%) 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 50.0 41.3 ug/L 83 (59%-126%) Page 63 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 554861 Page 2 of 1 ----Parmname NOM Sa!nplc Qual C Units RPO% RE % Ran e Anlst Date Time --- ,emi-Volatile-GC/MS 3atch 2171562 2-Chloronaphthalene 50.0 36.9 ug/L 74 (47%-108%) NM! 09/09/21 13:3 2-Chlorophenol 50.0 30.0 ug/L 60 (46%-107%) 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol 50.0 56.l ug/L ll2 (42%-149%) 2-Methylnaphthalene 50.0 36.l ug/L 72 (48%-104%) 2-Nitrophenol 50.0 35.9 ug/L 72 (56%-115%) 4-Bromopheny lpheny !ether 50.0 38.l ug/L 76 (49%-114%) 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 50.0 36.4 ug/L 73 (56%-118%) 4-Chlorophenylphenylether 50.0 39.1 ug/L 78 (56%-120%) 4-Nitrophenol 50.0 11.3 ug/L 23 (21%-110%) Acenaphthene 50.0 37.7 ug/L 75 (51%-109%) Acenaphthylene 50.0 37.8 ug/L 76 (51%-108%) Anthracene 50.0 39.4 ug/L 79 (56%-110%) Benzi dine 100 56.4 ug/L 56 (13%-141%) Benzo( a)anthracene 50.0 39.8 ug/L 80 (60%-112%) Benzo{a)pyrene 50.0 32.1 ug/L 64 (55%-110%) Page 64 of 116 SDG:· 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com QC Summarr Workorder: 554861 Page 3 of 1 -----Parm name ------NOM Samp~ Q!!!!!_ __ C Units RPD% REC% ~ge Anlst Date Time ~emi-Volatile-GC/MS 3atch 2171562 Benzo(b )fluoranthene 50.0 37.0 ug/L 74 (54%-111%) NM! 09/09/2 l 13:3- Benzo(ghi)perylene 50.0 33.9 ug/L 68 (44%-133%) Benzo(k)fluoranthene 50.0 38.2 ug/L 76 (54%-117%) Buty lbenzylphthalate 50.0 39.7 ug/L 79 (54%-118%) Chrysene 50.0 37.7 ug/L 75 (59%-116%) Di-n-butylphthalate 50.0 B 41.2 ug/L 82 (55%-122%) Di-n-octylphthalate 50.0 35. l ug/L 70 (50%-125%) ' Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 50.0 34.8 ug/L 70 (42%-130%) Diethy lphthalate 50.0 42.5 ug/L 85 (60%-121%) Dimethy lphthalate 50.0 41.6 ug/L 83 (62%-123%) Diphenylamine 50.0 37.2 ug/L 74 (48%-117%) Fluoranthene 50.0 44.8 ug/L 90 (54%-121%) Fluorene 50.0 40.2 ug/L 80 (56%-111%) Hexachlorobenzene 50.0 38.9 ug/L 78 (51%-118%) Hexachlorobutadiene 50.0 31.4 ug/L 63 (39%-103%) Page 65 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 554861 Page 4 of 1 Parmname NQM__ __ Sl!_lllpl~ Ql!l!L C Units RPD% ~C% _!!an e Anlst Date Time ,emi-Volatile-GC/MS 3atch 2171562 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 50.0 23.9 ug/L 48 (30%-95%) NMI 09/09/21 13:3 Hexachloroethane 50.0 28.0 ug/L 56 (36%-90%) Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene 50.0 35.5 ug/L 71 (48%-128%) Isophorone 50.0 39.0 ug/L 78 (58%-113%) N-Methyl-N-nitrosomethylamine 50.0 24.0 ug/L 48 (32%-84%) N-N itrosodipropy I amine 50.0 38.2 ug/L 76 (49%-118%) Naphthalene 50.0 36.1 ug/L 72 (49%-103%) Nitrobenzene 50.0 35.1 ug/L 70 (55%-110%) Pentachlorophenol 50.0 46.8 ug/L 94 (42%-132%) Phenanthrene 50.0 39.5 ug/L 79 (56%-110%) Phenol 50.0 14.7 ug/L 29 (12%-90%) Pyrene 50.0 38.1 ug/L 76 (43%-122%) Pyridine 50.0 26.6 ug/L 53 (25%-90%) bis(2-Chloro-l-methylethyl)ether 50.0 34.1 ug/L 68 (42%-115%) bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 50.0 33.9 ug/L 68 (56%-108%) Page 66 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 554861 Page 5 of 1 ----Parmname NOM am1>I<;_ Qu.!!_I_ C Units RPO% REC% Rane Anlst Date Time ---- ,emi-Volatile-GC/MS 3atch 2171562 bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether 50.0 34.2 ug/L 68 (47%-108%) NM! 09/09/21 13:J bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 50.0 36.5 ug/L 73 (47%-118%) m,p-Cresols 50.0 27.5 ug/L 55 (39%-95%) o-Cresol 50.0 28.4 ug/L 57 (39%-102%) 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 100 85.4 ug/L 85 (37%-132%) 2-Fluorobiphenyl 50.0 33.5 ug/L 67 (39%-112%) 2-Fluorophenol 100 35.7 ug/L 36 (I 1%-79%) ' Nitrobenzene-d5 50.0 32.2 ug/L 64 (39%-112%) Phenol-d5 100 27.8 ug/L 28 (15%-85%) p-Terphenyl-d14 50.0 33.2 ug/L 66 (24%-129%) QCl204905321 LCSD l ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 50.0 37.4 ug/L 13 75 (0%-30%) 09/09/21 14:0: l ,2-Dichlorobenzene 50.0 36.5 ug/L 15 73 (0%-30%) l ,2-Diphenylhydrazine 50.0 42.4 ug/L 17 85 (0%-30%) 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 50.0 34.9 ug/L 14 70 (0%-30%) 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 50.0 35.2 ug/L 13 70 (0%-30%) Page 67 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com QC Summar! Workorder: 554861 Page 6 of 1 ----Parmname NOM Sa_!llple ual C Units RPD% REC% Ran e Anlst Date Time ,emi-Volatile-GC/MS 3atch 2171562 1-Methy I naphthalene 50.0 43.1 ug/L 12 86 (0%-30%) NMl 09/09/21 14:0 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 50.0 43.7 ug/L 16 87 (0%-27%) 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 50.0 41.4 ug/L 14 83 (0%-28%) 2,4-Dichlorophenol 50.0 39.0 ug/L 13 78 (0%-30%) 2,4-Dimethylphenol 50.0 32.8 ug/L 16 66 (0%-30%) 2,4-Dinitrophenol 50.0 65.3 ug/L 9 131 (0%-30%) 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 50.0 50.0 ug/L 13 100 (0%-32%) 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 50.0 48.7 ug/L 16 97 (0%-30%) 2-Chloronaphthalene 50.0 42.2 ug/L 14 84 (0%-30%) 2-Chlorophenol 50.0 34.8 ug/L 15 70 (0%-30%) 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol 50.0 65.7 ug/L 16 131 (0%-30%) 2-Methylnaphthalene 50.0 41.1 ug/L 13 82 (0%-30%) 2-N itrophenol 50.0 41.3 ug/L 14 83 (0%-30%) 4-Bromophenylphenylether 50.0 44.8 ug/L 16 90 (0%-30%) 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 50.0 41.5 ug/L 13 83 (0%-30%) Page 68 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com QC Summar~ Workorder: 554861 Page 7 of I Parmname NOM le ~al C Units RPO% REC% Rang~Anlst Date Time ,emi-Volatile-GC/MS 3atch 2171562 4-Chlorophenylphenylether 50.0 44.5 ug/L 13 89 (0%-30%) NM! 09/09/21 14:0 4-Nitrophenol 50.0 12.1 ug/L 7 24 (0%-30%) Acenaphthene 50.0 43 .0 ug/L 13 86 (0%-30%) Acenaphthylene 50.0 43.3 ug/L 14 87 (0%-30%) Anthracene 50.0 45.4 ug/L 14 91 (0%-30%) Benzi dine 100 90.4 ug/L 46* 90 (0%-30%) Benzo( a)anthracene 50.0 46.9 ug/L 17 94 (0%-30%) Benzo(a)pyrene 50.0 37.4 ug/L 15 75 (0%-30%) Benzo(b )fluoranthene 50.0 41.7 ug/L 12 83 (0%-30%) Benzo(ghi)pery lene 50.0 44.9 ug/L 28 90 , (0%-30%) Benzo(k)fluoranthene 50.0 43.1 ug/L 12 86 (0%-30%) Buty lbenzy lphthalate 50.0 42.9 ug/L 8 86 (0%-30%) Chrysene 50.0 44.4 ug/L 16 89 (0%-30%) Di-n-butylphthalate 50.0 B 47.6 ug/L 14 95 (0%-30%) Di-n-octy lphthalate 50.0 45.9 ug/L 27 92 (0%-30%) Page 69 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 554861 Page 8 of 1 Parmname NOM Sam le Qual QC Units RPD% REC% Ran~e Anlst Date Time ------ ~emi-Volatile-GC/MS 3atch 2171562 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 50.0 47.3 ug/L 30 95 (0%-30%) NMl 09/09/21 14:0 Diethylphthalate 50.0 49.7 ug/L 16 99 (0%-30%) Dimethylphthalate 50.0 48.6 ug/L 16 97 (0%-30%) Dipheny lam ine 50.0 43.6 ug/L 16 87 (0%-30%) Fluoranthene 50.0 51.3 ug/L 14 103 (0%-30%) Fluorene 50.0 46.2 ug/L 14 92 (0%-30%) Hexachlorobenzene 50.0 45.9 ug/L 17 92 (0%-25%) Hexachlorobutadiene 50.0 34.8 ug/L 10 70 (0%-28%) Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 50.0 25.0 ug/L 4 50 (0%-30%) Hexachloroethane 50.0 32.5 ug/L 15 65 (0%-29%) Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene 50.0 47.1 ug/L 28 94 (0%-30%) lsophorone 50.0 45.3 ug/L 15 91 (0%-30%) N-Methyl-N-nitrosomethylamine 50.0 28.5 ug/L 17 57 (0%-30%) N-N itrosodipropy I amine 50.0 44.7 ug/L 16 89 (0%-30%) Naphthalene 50.0 41.0 ug/L 13 82 (0%-30%) Page 70 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com QC SummaJJ::: Workorder: 554861 Page 9 of 1 Parmname NOM Sample ual _Q~ Units RPO% REC% Rane Anlst Date Time ~emi-Volatile-GC/MS 3atch 2171562 Nitro benzene 50.0 40.3 ug/L 14 81 (0%-28%) NMl 09/09/2114:0 Pentachlorophenol 50.0 54.6 ug/L 15 109 (0%-33%) Phenanthrene 50.0 45.9 ug/L 15 92 (0%-30%) Phenol 50.0 17.4 ug/L 17 35 (0%-30%) Pyrene 50.0 39.5 ug/L 4 79 (0%-30%) Pyridine 50.0 28.9 ug/L 8 58 (0%-154%) bis(2-Chloro-1-methylethyl)ether 50.0 39.6 ug/L 15 79 (0%-30%) bis(2-Chloroethoxy )methane 50.0 39.3 ug/L 15 79 (0%-30%) bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether 50.0 39.8 ug/L 15 80 (0%-30%) bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 50.0 40.4 ug/L 10 81 (0%-30%) m,p-Cresols 50.0 31.6 ug/L 14 63 (0%-34%) o-Cresol 50.0 32.6 ug/L 14 65 (0%-36%) 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 100 97.5 ug/L 98 (37%-132%) 2-Fluorobiphenyl 50.0 37.4 ug/L 75 (39%-112%) 2-Fluorophenol 100 41.5 ug/L 42 (11%-79%) Page 71 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 55486) Page 10 of 1 Parmname NOM Sam~Qual Q!2 Units RPO% REC% ~e Anlst Date Time iemi-Volatile-GC/MS 3atch 2171562 N itrobenzene-d5 50.0 36.9 ug/L 74 (39%-112%) NMl 09/09/21 14:0 Phenol-d5 100 32.7 ug/L 33 (15%-85%) p-Terphenyl-d14 50.0 34.5 ug/L 69 (24%-129%) QC1204905319 MB 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene u ND ug/L 09/09/21 13 :O, 1,2-Dichlorobenzene u ND ug/L 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine u ND ug/L 1,3-Dichlorobenzene u ND ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobenzene u ND ug/L 1-Methylnaphthalene u ND ug/L 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol u ND ug/L 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol u ND ug/L 2,4-Dichlorophenol u ND ug/L 2,4-Dimethylphenol u ND ug/L 2,4-Dinitrophenol u ND ug/L 2,4-Dinitrotoluene u ND ug/L Page 72 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 554861 Page 11 of I ---Parmname NOM __ S~_!!lple QC Units RPO% REC% Ran e Anlg Date Time ---- ,emi-Volatile-G C/MS 3atch 2171562 2,6-Dinitrotoluene u ND ug/L NMl 09/09/21 13 :O, 2-Chloronaphthalene u ND ug/L 2-Chlorophenol u ND ug/L 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol u ND ug/L 2-Methylnaphthalene u ND ug/L 2-N itrophenol u ND ug/L 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine u ND ug/L 4-Bromophenylphenylether u ND ug/L 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol u ND ug/L 4-Chlorophenylpheny I ether u ND ug/L 4-Nitrophenol u ND ug/L Acenaphthene u ND ug/L Acenaphthy Jene u ND ug/L Anthracene u ND ug/L Benzi dine u ND ug/L Page 73 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com QC Summar! Workorder: 554861 Page 12 of 1 ------Parmname NOM Sam le ual Units_ RPD% REC% Ran~ Anlst Date Time -- ,emi-Volatile-GC/MS 3atch 2171562 Benzo( a )anthracene u ND ug/L NMI 09/09/21 13:0, Benzo( a)pyrene u ND ug/L Benzo(b )fl uoranthene u ND ug/L Benzo(ghi)pery Jene u ND ug/L Benzo(k)fluoranthene u ND ug/L Butylbenzylphthalate u ND ug/L Chrysene u ND ug/L I Di-n-butylphthalate u ND ug/L Di-n-octylphthalate u ND ug/L Dibenzo( a,h )anthracene u ND ug/L Diethylphthalate u ND ug/L Dimethylphthalate u ND ug/L Diphenylamine u ND ug/L Fluoranthene u ND ug/L Fluorene u ND ug/L Page 74 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 554861 Page 13 of 1 ---Parmname NOM Sam le Q_ual C Units RPO% REC% Rane Anlst Date Time ------- iiemi-Volatile-GC/MS 3atch 2171562 Hexachlorobenzene u ND ug/L NMI 09/09/21 13 :0, Hexachlorobutadiene u ND ug/L Hexachlorocyclopentadiene u ND ug/L Hexachloroethane u ND ug/L Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene u ND ug/L Isophorone u ND ug/L N-Methyl-N-nitrosomethylamine u ND ug/L ' N-Nitrosodipropylamine u ND ug/L Naphthalene u ND ug/L Nitrobenzene u ND ug/L Pentachlorophenol u ND ug/L Phenanthrene u ND ug/L Phenol u ND ug/L Pyrene u ND ug/L Pyridine u ND ug/L Page 75 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Workorder: 554861 Parmname NOM -- Semi-Volatile-GC/MS 3atch 2171562 bis(2-Chloro-l-methylethyl)ether bis(2-Chloroethoxy )methane bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate m,p-Cresols o-Cresol 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 100 2-Fluorobiphenyl 50.0 2-Fluorophenol 100 Nitrobenzene-d5 50.0 Phenol-d5 100 p-Terphenyl-dl4 50.0 Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows: ** < > Analyte is a surrogate compound Result is less than value reported Result is greater than value reported QC Summar_y _Sam~le Q_ual C Units u ND ug/L u ND ug/L u ND ug/L u ND ug/L u ND ug/L u ND ug/L 87.8 ug/L 37.8 ug/L 42.7 ug/L 36.7 ug/L 30.9 ug/L 38.0 ug/L The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product RPO% A B For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank. Page 76 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl REC% 88 76 43 73 31 76 Page 14 of 1 ------Rane Anlst Date Time NM! 09/09/21 13:0, (37%-132%) (39%-112%) (11%-79%) (39%-112%) (15%-85%) (24%-129%) GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 554861 Page 15 of I Parmname NOM __ Sam(l)e QC Units ~D% REC% __ Rang~ ~st Date Time C Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample E Organics--Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range F Estimated Value H Analytical holding time was exceeded JNX Non Calibrated Compound M Matrix Related Failure N Organics--Presumptive evidence based on mass spectral library search to make a tentative identification of the analyte (TIC). Quantitation is based on nearest internal standard response factor NIA RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply. NJ ND NJ p Q R u UJ X y h See case narrative Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier Organics--The concentrations between the primary and confirmation columns/detectors is >40% different. For HPLC, difference is also <70% One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER. Sample results are rejected Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL. Compound cannot be extracted Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier QC Samples were not spiked with this compound RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry. Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded NI A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceed · spike cone. by a factor of 4 or more or %RPI not applkable. "The Relative Percent Difforenc (RPO) obtained from lhe sample duplicate (DU P) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria , hen the ample is greater than live times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In i:a e where ither the ample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of+/-the RL is used to evaluate the DUP result. * Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications. For PS, PSD, and SDIL T results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations. Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary. Page 77 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Product: Specific Gravity General Chemistry Technical Case Narrative Energy Fuels Resources SDG #: 554861 nal tical Me .hod: ASTM D 5057 Analytical Procedure: GL-GC-E-065 REV# 7 Analytical Batch: 2173276 The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s). GEL Sample ID# 554861001 554861002 554861003 554861004 554861005 554861006 554861007 554861008 Slimes #2 Cell 4A Cell 4A LDS Cell 4B Cell 4B LDS Cell 65 Cell 3 le Identification The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis. Data Summary: There are no exceptions, anomalies or deviations from the specified methods. All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable. Certification Statement Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative. Page 78 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Qualifier Definition Report for DNMIOOl Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Client SDG: 554861 GEL Work Order: 554861 The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows: * A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria ** Analyte is a surrogate compound ReviewNalidation GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data reviewer. In addition, all CLP-like deliverables receive a third level review of the fractional data package. The following data validator verified the information presented in this data report: Signature: ~ #,, Name: Aubrey Kingsbury Date: 24 SEP 2021 Title: Data Validator Page 79 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com QC Summary Reoort Date: October 4, 2021 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Page 1 of 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel Workorder: 554861 -----Parmname NOM C Units RPD¾ REC% Rane Anlst Date Time fligh Rad Testing 3atch 2177500 QC1204916258 554861001 DUP Thorium-228 469 361 pCi/L 25.9* (0%-20%) TC! 09/25/21 10:0 Uncertainty +/-66.1 +/-65.4 Thorium-230 l.74E+05 l.81E+05 pCi/L 4.35 (0%-20%) Uncertainty +/-1200 +/-1360 Thorium-232 1060 760 pCi/L 32.6* (0%-20%) Uncertainty +/-93.8 +/-88.9 QC1204916259 LCS Thorium-228 2350 pCi/L 09/25/21 I 0:0 Uncertainty +/-148 Thorium-230 433 pCi/L (75%-125%) Uncertainty +/-68.5 Thorium-232 1990 2230 pCi/L 112 (75%-125%) Uncertainty +/-144 QC1204916257 MB Thorium-228 u 0.101 pCi/L 09/28/21 09:2' Uncertainty +/-10.8 Thorium-230 90.9 pCi/L Uncertainty +/-30.8 Thorium-232 u -6.03 pCi/L Uncertainty +/-7.90 3atch 2177508 QC1204916267 554861001 DUP Gross Radium Alpha 24600 28700 pCi/L 15.4 (0%-20%) TC! 09/28/21 09:3 Uncertainty +/-255 +/-281 QC1204916270 LCS Gross Radium Alpha 22800 19000 pCi/L 83.2 (75%-125%) 09/28/21 09:3 Uncertainty +/-210 Page 113 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 554861 Page 2 of ---Parmname NOM SamP-le Q!.tal C Units RPO% REC% Rang!__Ani!!_ Date Time - High Rad Testing 3atch 2177508 QC1204916266 MB Gross Radium Alpha u 23.1 pCi/L TCl 09/28/21 09:3 Uncertainty +/-9.95 QC1204916268 554861001 MS Gross Radium Alpha 23000 24600 27300 pCi/L 11.7 * (75%-125%) 09/29/21 11 :2 Uncertainty +/-255 +/-229 QC1204916269 554861001 MSD Gross Radium Alpha 23000 24600 31900 pCi/L 15.3 31.3 * (0%-20%) 09/29/2 I 11 :2 Uncertainty +/-255 +/-246 3atch 2177509 QC1204916272 554861001 DUP Radium-226 424 433 pCi/L 2.18 (0%-20%) LXPI 10/03/21 07:5 Uncertainty +/-29.8 +/-27.9 QC1204916274 LCS Radium-226 1350 1380 pCi/L 102 (75%-125%) 10/03/21 07:5 Uncertainty +/-48.9 QC1204916271 MB Radium-226 u 13.3 pCi/L 10/03/21 07 :5 Uncertainty +/-8.27 QC1204916273 554861001 MS Radium-226 1350 424 1440 pCi/L 75.2 (75%-125%) 10/03/21 07:5 Uncertainty +/-29.8 +/-49.4 3atch 2178805 QC1204918845 554861001 DUP Uranium-233/234 2.18E+05 2.43E+05 pCi/L 10.9 (0%-20%) TC! 09/28/21 09:2, Uncertainty +/-4910 +/-5860 Uranium-235/236 11800 12100 pCi/L 1.91 (0%-20%) Uncertainty +/-1280 +/-1460 Uranium-238 2.2IE+05 2.48E+05 pCi/L 11.6 (0%-20%) Uncertainty +/-4940 +/-5930 QC1204918846 LCS Uranium-233/234 3440 pCi/L 09/28/21 09:2, Uncertainty +/-186 Uranium-235/236 204 pCi/L Uncertainty +/-52.8 Page 114 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 554861 Page 3 of Parmname NOM Sample_Q_ual Units RPO% REC% Range_____.A_nlst Date Time ----- High Rad Testing 3atch 2178805 Uranium-238 2720 3410 pCilL 125 (75%-125%) TCl 09128121 09:2, Uncertainty +l-186 QC1204918844 MB Uranium-2331234 u 3.39 pCi/L 09128121 09:2, Uncertainty +l-22.1 Uranium-2351236 u 11.9 pCilL Uncertainty +l-20.7 Uranium-238 u 28.0 pCilL Uncertainty +l-21.2 3atch 2179693 QC1204920652 554861008 DUP Thorium-228 u 15.7 u -2.03 pCi/L NIA NIA TCI 10/0212121:0 Uncertainty +l-8.08 +l-10.3 Thorium-230 31.2 u 8.02 pCi/L 20.6 (0%-100%) Uncertainty +l-9.10 +l-7.59 Thorium-232 u 14.4 u 4.46 pCilL NIA NIA Uncertainty +l-6.86 +l-4.72 QC 1204920653 LCS Thorium-228 2030 pCilL 09130121 13:3' Uncertainty +l-127 Thorium-230 219 pCi/L (75%-125%) Uncertainty +l-45.1 Thorium-232 1990 2010 pCilL 101 (75%-125%) Uncertainty +l-126 QC 1204920651 MB Thorium-228 u 6.19 pCilL I 0102121 21 :0 Uncertainty +l-6.76 Thorium-230 u 21.5 pCi/L Uncertainty +l-10.3 Thorium-232 u -0.897 pCi/L Uncertainty +l-4.48 Notes: Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (I-sigma). Page 115 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 554861 Parmname NOM Sam le Range Anlst The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows: ** < > A B BD C D F H K L M M Analyte is a surrogate compound Result is less than value reported Result is greater than value reported The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank. Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low Analyte has been confirmed by GCIMS analysis Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample Estimated Value Analytical holding time was exceeded Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actual value is expected to be lower. Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low. Actual value is expected to be higher. M if above MDC and less than LLD Matrix Related Failure NIA RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply. NI ND NJ Q R u UI UJ UL X y I\ h See case narrative Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER. Sample results are rejected Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL. Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification Not considered detected. The associated number is the reported concentration, which may be inaccurate due to a low bias. Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier QC Samples were not spiked with this compound RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +I-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry. Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded Page 4 of Date Time NIA indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike cone. by a factor of 4 or more or %RPD not applicable. /\ The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater than five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of +I-the RL is used to evaluate the DUP result. * Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications. For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations. Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary. Page 116 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Contact: Workorder: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. 225 Union Boulevard Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado Ms. Kathy Weinel 554861 QC Summary Reoort Date: September 24, 2021 Parmname'----- Notes: -------"-N--'-O=--=---M=-----=S=a=m=le ual __ Q_C __ U_n_it_s __ R_P_D_¾ REC_0_1/o __ R_a_n~~e Anlst The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows: ** < > A B C D E F H M Analyte is a surrogate compound Result is less than value reported Result is greater than value reported The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank. Analyte has been confirmed by GCIMS analysis Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample General Chemistry--Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range Estimated Value Analytical holding time was exceeded Matrix Related Failure NIA RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply. NI ND NJ Q R u X y z I\ d h See case narrative Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER. Sample results are rejected Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL. Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier QC Samples were not spiked with this compound Paint Filter Test--Particulates passed through the filter, however no free liquids were observed. RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +I-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry. 5-day BOD--The 2: 1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded Page 1 of Date Time NIA indicates that pike recovery limit do not apply when sam1 le concentration exceeds pike cone. by a factor of 4 or more or %RPD not applicable. /\ The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from U1e sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated agai.nst Ule acceptance criteria when the sample is greater than five times (5X) the contract required detecti.on limit (RL). Jn cases where either U,c sample or duplicate value i less than 5X the RL, a control limit of +I-the RL is used to evaluate the DUP result. * Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications. For PS, PSD, and SDIL T results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations. Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary. Page 88 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Radiochemistry Technical Case Narrative Energy Fuels Resources SDG #: 554861 Product: Alphaspec Th, Liquid Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, Th-01-RC Modified Analytical Procedure: GL-RAD-A-038 REV# 18 Analytical Batch: 2177500 Compo ite Preparation Method: GL-RAD-A-026 Compo ite Preparation Procedure: GL-RAD-A-026 REV# 18 Composite Preparation Batch: 2171222 The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s). GEL Sample ID# 554861001 554861002 554861003 554861004 554861005 554861006 554861007 1204916257 1204916258 1204916259 Cli ent Sample Identification Cell 1 Slimes #2 Cell 4A Cell 4A LDS Cell 4B Ce114B LDS Cell 65 Method Blank (MB) 554861001(Cell 1) Sample Duplicate (DUP) Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis. Data Summary: All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable, with the following exceptions. Quality Control (OC) Information Method Blank Criteria The blank (See Below) activity is greater than the MDC but is less than five percent of the lowest activity in the batch. Sample Analyte Value 1204916257 (MB) Thorium-230 Result: 90.9 pCi/L > MDA: 73.3 pCi/L > RDL: 1.00 pCi/L Duplication Criteria between QC Sample and Duplicate Sample The Sample and the Duplicate, (See Below), did not meet the relative percent difference requirement; however, they do meet the relative error ratio requirement with the value listed below. Sample Analyte Value Page 89 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl 1204916258 (Cell lDUP) Thorium-228 RPD 25.9* (0.00%-20.00%) RER 1.05 (0-3) Thorium-232 RPD 32.6* (0.00%-20.00%) RER 1.86 (0-3) RDLMet The blank (See Below) did not meet the detection limit due to keeping the blank volume consistent with the other sample aliquots. Sample Analyte Value 1204916257 (MB) Thorium-228 Result 0.101 < MDA 47.5 > RDL I pCi/L Thorium-232 Result -6.03 < MDA 45 > RDL l pCi/L Sample (See Below) did not meet the detection limit due to the small sample aliquot used. The aliquot was reduced due to the high activity of other isotopes and in attempt to minimize interference. Sample Analyte Value 554861002 (Slimes #2) Thorium-228 Result -24.3 < MDA 83.9 > RDL I pCi/L Thorium-232 Result 13.7 < MDA 48.5 > RDL l pCi/L Technical Information Recounts Sample 1204916257 (MB) was recounted to verify sample results. Recount is reported. Product: U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified Analytical Procedure: GL-RAD-A-011 REV# 28 Analytical Batch: 2178805 Composite Preparation Method: GL-RAD-A-026 Composite Preparation Procedure: GL-RAD-A-026 REV# 18 Composite Preparation Batch: 2171222 The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s). GEL Sample ID# 554861001 554861002 554861003 554861004 554861005 554861006 554861007 554861008 1204918844 Client ample Identification Cell I Slimes #2 Cell 4A Cell4A LDS Cell 4B Cell 4B LDS Cell 65 Cell 3 Method Blank (MB) Page 90 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl 1204918845 1204918846 55486100l(Cell 1) Sample Duplicate (DUP) Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis. Data Summary: All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable, with the following exceptions. Quality Control (OC) Information RDLMet The blank (See Below) did not meet the detection limit due to keeping the blank volume consistent with the other sample aliquots. Sample Analyte Value 1204918844 (MB) Uranium-233/234 Result 3.39 < MDA 90.7 > RDL I pCi/L Uranium-235/236 Result 11.9 < MDA 75.1 > RDL 1 pCi/L Uranium-238 Result 28 < MDA 60.8 > RDL I pCi/L Sample (See Below) did not meet the detection limit due to the small sample aliquot used. The aliquot was reduced due to the high activity of other isotopes and in attempt to minimize interference. Sample Analyte Value 554861008 (Cell 3) Uranium-235/236 Result -7.14 < MDA 81.3 > RDL 1 pCi/L Product: Alphaspec Th, Liquid Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, Th-01-RC Modified Analytical Procedure: GL-RAD-A-038 REV# 18 Analytical Batch: 2179693 Composite Preparation Method: GL-RAD-A-026 Composite Preparation Procedure: GL-RAD-A-026 REV# 18 Composite Preparation Batch: 2171222 The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s). GEL Sample ID# 554861008 1204920651 1204920652 1204920653 Client Sample Identification Cell 3 Method Blank (MB) 554861008(Cell 3) Sample Duplicate (DUP) Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) Page 91 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis. Data Summary: All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable, with the following exceptions. Quality Control (QC} Information RDLMet The blank (See Below) did not meet the detection limit due to keeping the blank volume consistent with the other sample aliquots. Sample Analyte Value 1204920651 (MB) Thorium-228 Result 6.19 < MDA 23 > RDL 1 pCi/L Thorium-230 Result 21.5 < MDA 31. 7 > RDL 1 pCi/L Thorium-232 Result-0.897 < MDA 18.1 > RDL 1 pCi/L Samples (See Below) did not meet the detection limits due to the small sample aliquots used. The aliquots were reduced due to the high activity of other isotopes and in attempt to minimize interference. Sample Analyte Value 1204920652 (Cell 3DUP) Thorium-228 Result -2.03 < MDA 38.8 > RDL I pCi/L Thorium-230 Result 8.02 < MDA 25.4 > RDL 1 pCi/L Thorium-232 Result 4.46 < MDA 14.6 > RDL 1 pCi/L 554861008 (Cell 3) Thorium-228 Result 15.7 < MDA 24.3 > RDL 1 pCi/L Thorium-232 Result 14.4 < MDA 19.4 > RDL 1 pCi/L Technical Information Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis Samples were reprepped due to high blank activity. The re-analysis is being reported. Recounts Samples 1204920651 (MB), 1204920652 (Cell 3DUP) and 554861008 (Cell 3) were recounted due to high MDCs. The recounts are reported. Product; GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Liquid Analytical Method: EPA 903.0 Analytical Procedure: GL-RAD-A-010 REV# 21 Analytical Batch: 2177508 Composite Preparation Method: GL-RAD-A-026 Page 92 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl Composite Preparation Procedure: GL-RAD-A-026 REV# 18 Composite Preparation .Batch: 2171222 The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s). GEL Sample ID# 554861001 554861002 554861003 554861004 554861005 554861006 554861007 554861008 1204916266 1204916267 1204916268 1204916269 1204916270 Client Sample Identification Cell 1 Slimes #2 Cell 4A Cell4ALDS Cell 4B Cell 4B LDS Cell 65 Cell 3 Method Blank (MB) 55486100l(Cell 1) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 55486100l(Cell l) Matrix Spike (MS) 55486100l(Cell 1) Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis. Data Summary: All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable, with the following exceptions. Preparation Jnformation Preparation Information Samples were filtered to remove any solids Quality Control (OC) Information Matrix Spike (MS) Recovery Matrix spike (See Below) recovery requirement not met due to the matrix of the sample. Sample Analyte Value 1204916268 (Cell IMS) Gross Radium Alpha 11.7* (75%-125%) Matrix Spike Duplicate (See Below) recovery requirement not met due to the matrix of the sample. Sample Analyte Value 1204916269 (Cell lMSD) Gross Radium Alpha 31.3* (75%-125%) RDLMet The blank (See Below) did not meet the detection limit due to keeping the blank volume consistent with the other sample aliquots. Sample Analyte Value Page 93 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl 1204916266 (MB) Gross Radium Alpha Result 23 . l < MDA 26.4 > RDL l pCi/L Sample (See Below) did not meet the detection limit due to limited sample volume. Sample Analyte Value 554861008 (Cell 3) Gross Radium Alpha Result 18.5 < MDA 19.8 > RDL 1 pCi/L Technical Information Recounts Samples 1204916268 (Cell lMS) and 1204916269 (Cell lMSD) were recounted due to low recovery. The recounts are reported. Product: Lucas Cell, Ra226, liquid Analytical Method: EPA 903.1 Modified Analytical Procedure: GL-RAD-A-008 REV# 15 Analytical Batch: 2177509 Composite Preparation Method: GL-RAD-A-026 Composite Preparation Procedure: GL-RAD-A-026 REV# 18 Composite Preparation Batch: 2171222 The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s). GEL Sample ID# 554861001 554861002 554861003 554861004 554861005 554861006 554861007 554861008 1204916271 1204916272 1204916273 1204916274 Client Sample Identification Cell l Slimes #2 Cell 4A Cell 4A LDS Cell 4B Cell 4B LDS Cell 65 Cell 3 Method Blank (MB) 55486100l(Cell 1) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 55486100l(Cell 1) Matrix Spike (MS) Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis. Data Summary: All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable, with the following exceptions. Quality Control (QC) Information Page 94 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl RDL Met Samples (See Below) did not meet the detection limits due to the small sample aliquots used. The aliquots were reduced due to the matrix of the samples. The samples were counted the maximum count time in order to achieve the lowest possible MDAs. Sample Analyte Value 1204916271 (MB) Radium-226 Result 13.3 < MDA 27.3 > RDL 1 pCi/L 554861008 (Cell 3) Radium-226 Result 2.06 < MDA 15.8 > RDL 1 pCi/L Certification Statement Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative. Page 95 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Qualifier Definition Report for DNMIO0l Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Client SDG: 554861 GEL Work Order: 554861 The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows: * A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria ** Analyte is a surrogate compound U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL. Review/Validation GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data reviewer. In addition, all CLP-like deliverables receive a third level review of the fractional data package. The following data validator verified the information presented in this data report: Signature: j~ ~ Name: Theresa Austin Date: 04 OCT 2021 Title: Group Leader Page 96 of 116 SDG: 554861 Revl TabD Chemical and Radiological Summary Tables Cell 1 Chemical and Radiological Characteristics Constituent 1987 2003 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2018 2019 2020 2021 -, Resample Resample Major Ions (mg/L) Carbonate <5 <1 ND ND <l <1 <l <1 <1 NS <l <l <l <l <l NS <5 <5 <5 Bicarbonate <5 NA ND ND <1 <l <1 <1 <1 NS <l <l <l <l <1 NS <5 <5 <5 Calcium 630 307 483.8 604 635 711 577 426 "768 NS . 404 573 647 581 518 NS 720 618 234 Chloride 8000 6728 37340 9830 20700 7440 33800 78000 9900 NS 11600 25500 19200 19900 39300 NS 19800 40000 74700 Fluoride <100 3005 31.72 0.3 0.4 28.4 69.2 62.9 4130 NS 2380 5880 2980 4290 5020 NS 3480 7460 14900 Magnesium 7900 5988 21220 6550 16200 5410 14300 16000 4470 NS 5530 12400 9210 93 80 20800 NS 9200 12300 19800 Nitrogen-Ammonia 7800 3353 10628 5250 15200 8120 12900 9750 3900 NS 5700 5.4 7090 1040 9810 NS 10400 10600 5850 Nitrogen-Nitrate <100 41.8 269.4 64.9 142 58 212 556 128 NS 53 192 124 152 328 NS 118 191 27 Potassium NA 647 5698 1880 4140 1840 4510 9750 6580 NS 3010 7330 1970 2700 4790 NS 2600 4580 4030 Sodium 10000 8638 62600 13200 39000 16700 29500 41700 15900 NS 12200 32100 18900 23900 53500 NS 28000 62900 91900 Sulfate 190000 63667 287600 118000 232000 107000 182000 158000 100000 NS 124000 204000 212000 165000 253000 NS 169000 222000 351000 pH (s.u.) 0.70 1.88 0.80 1.53 l.15 2.73 2.23 1.90 2.74 NS 1.30 1.01 <1.00 <l.00 <1.00 NS 1.14 0.92 0.4 TDS 120000 94700 357400 131000 140000 130000 216000 342000 149000 NS 159000 334000 242000 231000 361000 NS 257000 422000 584000 Conductivity (umhos/cm) NA NA NA NA 365000 110000 112000 136000 94200 NS 113000 131000 123000 57600 110000 NS 119000 81500 76000 Metals (ug/L) Arsenic 440000 121267 849000 271000 436000 74400 299000 25500 9800 NS 249000 377000 407000 391000 641000 NS 270000 599000 1040000 Beryllium 780 475 2262 500 410 338 1270 3180 415 NS 448 1290 1030 749 1510 NS 930 1330 3660 Cadmium 6600 3990 29320 8790 9120 2940 13700 30700 2380 NS 3060 7710 6320 6730 14000 NS 5400 9070 21300 Chromium 13000 6365 29940 6760 18700 5620 22700 12100 8350 NS 13200 19600 14000 15900 21100 NS 15000 25700 29600 Cobalt 120000 NA 88240 23500 97500 16200 56000 53100 25500 NS 56500 82000 77200 91400 113000 NS 66000 51400 59500 Copper 740000 196667 881000 360000 168000 125000 483000 885000 544000 NS 3420000 3560000 4730000 3440000 4550000 NS 1700000 2110000 3760000 Iron 3400000 2820000 13480000 3280000 2390000 3400000 8940000 840000 1420000 NS 2520000 6680000 5650000 2300000 12200000 NS 9100000 15400000 6680000 Lead <20000 3393 27420 11200 10600 9240 23600 17000 2810 NS 13500 16800 22500 23000 41000 NS 22000 42400 91200 Manganese 140000 162500 990200 206000 723000 173000 735000 1560000 188000 NS 162000 515000 713000 510000 936000 NS 540000 833000 1630000 Mercury NA NA ND ND 7.61 7.2 61.4 117 6.16 NS 12.5 24.6 8.59 7.86 16.8 NS 3.7 14 0.035 Molybdenum 240000 50550 415600 106000 142000 35300 235000 434000 16800 NS 68800 127000 97100 128000 239000 NS 120000 247000 418000 Nickel 370000 36950 40860 32000 156000 27500 43700 15000 39100 NS 129000 130000 170000 183000 167000 NS 110000 27100 18400 Selenium <20000 1862 15420 13000 14800 5220 11600 8090 2690 NS 3970 7070 3950 5070 10700 NS 10000 16600 21800 Silver <5000 NA 1559.2 449 558 155 1110 4310 329 NS 336 1390 1240 1240 2320 NS 790 1290 2640 Thallium 45000 NA 407.8 165 387 193 560 13 63.3 NS 876 1130 754 155 442 NS <700 <50 1680 Tin <5000 NA 6512 1240 2290 263 1500 <100 <100 NS <17000 <100 <17000 <17000 <17000 NS 540 1220 1820 Uranium 105000 134517 788600 416000 578000 159000 838000 1450000 140000 NS 137000 363000 131000 102000 248000 NS 81000 200000 655000 Vanadium 280000 348000 2208200 1200000 773000 752000 2500000 1940000 98200 NS 485000 1130000 746000 1520000 2440000 NS 1400000 2090000 4410000 Zinc 1300000 NA 642940 476000 229000 171000 398000 811000 228000 NS 229000 638000 448000 515000 948000 NS 550000 396000 905000 Radiologies (pCi!L) 735000 Gross Alpha NA 1693331 29380 21900 16500 11300 3610 12600 32700 NS 331000 (8/4/2015) 420000 191000 550000 NS 326000 83800 24600 73800 (5/28/2015) Cell I Chemical and Radiological Characteristics Constituent 1987 2003 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2018 2019 2020 2021 Resample Resample voes (ug/L) Acetone 35 NA 66.5 110 710 260 80 310 41.1 NS <700 56 40.6 28 50.4 NS 28 32.6 152 Benzene <5 NA ND ND <1 <l <1 <l <l NS <5.0 <I <I <l <l NS <l <l <5 Carbon tetrachloride <5 NA ND ND <1 <l <l <l <1 NS <5.0 <I <I <I <l NS <l <l <5 Chloroform 8 NA 6.7 6.6 16 4.9 13 19 7.62 NS <70.0 5.54 <l 3.42 114 NS 7.5 2.84 46.2 Chloromethane NA NA ND 9.4 11 4.4 3.6 4 5 NS <30.0 1.93 <l 1.13 1.16 NS 2.3 1.49 <5 MEK NA NA ND ND 120 65 <1 200 <20 NS <4000 <20 <20 <20 <20 NS 11 J 6.41 <25 Methylene Chloride 11 NA ND ND 2 <1 <l 2 <1 NS <5.0 1.83 <l 1.09 2.41 NS <1 <5 <25 Naphthalene <10000 NA <10 ND 1.1 5.4 2 3 <l NS <100 <l <l <1 <l NS <l <l <5 Tetrahydrofuran NA NA 150 <20 <100 <10 <500 2.9 <1 NS <46.0 <l <I <l 4.93 NS <35 <5 <25 Toluene <5 NA ND ND <1 <I <1 <1 <1 NS <1000 <l <I <l <1 NS <l <1 <5 Xylenes <5 NA ND ND <l <l <l <l <l NS <10000 <1 <I <1 <I NS <l <3 <15 SVOCS (ug/L) 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30 <37.5 1,2-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30 <37.5 1,3-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30 <37.5 1,4-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30 <37.5 1-Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3.0 <3.75 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30 <37.5 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <IO <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30 <37.5 2,4-Dichlorophenol NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30 <37.5 2,4-Dimethylphenol NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30 <37.5 2,4-Di n i trophenol NA NA NA NA <250 <20 <20 <20 <21.6 <20 <20 <20 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <50 <50 <62.5 2,4-Dinitrotoluene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30 <37.5 2,6-Dinitrotoluene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <IO <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <IO <148 <8.04 <10 <30 <37.5 2-Chloronaphthalene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <4.1 <5.13 2-Chlorophenol NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30 <37.5 2-Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <IO <148 <8.04 <10 <3 <3.75 2-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30 <37.5 2-Nitrophenol NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30 <37.5 3&4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA <22 <10 <IO <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <37 <46.3 3,3-Dichlorobenzidi ne NA NA NA NA <100 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <50 <33 <41.3 4,6-Dinitro-2-NA NA NA NA <250 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <50 <30 <37.5 methyl phenol 4-Bromophenyl phenyl NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <IO <10 <10 <10 <IO <148 <8.04 <10 <30 <37.5 ether 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30 <37.5 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30 <37.5 ether 4-Nitrophenol NA NA NA NA <250 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <50 <30 <37.5 Acenaphthene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3 <3.75 Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3 <3.75 Anthracene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3 <3.75 Azobenzene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30 <37.5 Benz(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8 .04 <10 <3 <3.75 Cell 1 Chemical and Radiological Characteristics Otit tll!utmt J!~87/ am. ., fflOI ®W)! ~ Q ;J lDlfl 2DlU 2013 -4 lffl1fS 2l)'ffi ! ' llbl DlB $Jl9l 3RD 2'.08 Resample ltesmnple Benzidine NA NA NA NA <100 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 41 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <100 <39 <48.8 Benzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3 <3.75 Benzo(b )fluoranthene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3 <3.75 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3 <3.75 Benzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3 <3.75 B is(2-chloroethoxy) NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3 <37.5 methane Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30 <37.5 Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30 <37.5 ether B is(2-ethylhexyl) NA NA NA NA <50 27 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3 <3.75 phthalate Butyl benzyl phthalate NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3 <3.75 Chrysene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3 <3.75 Di benz( a,h )anthracene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3 <3.75 Diethyl phthalate NA NA NA NA 170 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3 <3.75 Dimethyl phthalate NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3 <3.75 Di-n-butyl phthalate NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3 <3.75 Di-n-octyl phthalate NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3 <3.75 Fluoranthene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3 <3.75 Fluorene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3 <3.75 Hexachlorobenzene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30 <37.5 Hexachlorobutadiene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <30 <30 <37.5 Hexachloro -NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 cyclopentadiene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30 <37.5 Hexachloroethane NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <30 <30 <37.5 Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3 <3.75 Isophorone NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <35 <43.8 Naphthalene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3 <3.75 Nitro benzene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30 <37.5 N-Nitrosodimethylamine NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30 <37.5 N-Nitrosodi-n-NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 propylamine <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30 <37.5 N-Nitrosodiphenylamine NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30 <37.5 Pentachlorophenol NA NA NA NA <250 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <50 <30 <37.5 Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3 <3.75 Phenol NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30 <37.5 Pyrene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3 <3.75 Pyridine NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <20 <30 146 1 Historic values reported for Gross Alpha from 1987 and 2003 are total gross alpha reported in pCi/L. All other gross alpha data are reported as Gross Alpha minus Rn & U . Cell 2 Slimes Drain Chemical and Radiological Characteristics Constituents 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Major Ions (mg/L) Carbonate ND ND <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <5 <5 <5 Bicarbonate ND ND <1 <1 <l <1 <1 <1 <l <l <l <1 <5 <5 <5 Calcium 572 528 508 496 474 462 465 322 524 402 477 538 480 513 463 Chloride 3700 3860 2750 3510 3 I 10 3730 3270 3720 3850 4040 3820 4310 3870 4080 4200 Fluoride 3.3 ND <0.1 2.4 2.1 1.32 161 130 204 48.4 110 116 105 130 130 Magnesium 4100 4030 3750 3790 3640 3760 3320 2780 3810 3570 3630 4470 3700 3800 3950 Nitrogen-Ammonia 4020 3620 3240 3820 2940 3540 1880 3500 367 3800 500 5620 4420 7150 2950 Nitrogen-Nitrate 30.9 20.3 38 126 38 27 47.2 35 1.06 12.7 13.7 12.1 33.0 21.6 48.0 Potassium 636 560 689 620 636 611 622 489 659 512 668 774 710 735 661 Sodium 4050 4600 4410 4770 4590 4380 3980 3130 4800 4690 4810 5290 4600 4620 4520 Sulfate 60600 74000 72200 63700 64200 58300 83700 62200 57800 83900 58300 63300 67000 67000 68500 pH (s.u.) 3.18 3.24 3.11 3.39 3.18 3 3.02 3.1 3.1 2.99 3.08 2.89 3.07 3.06 3.0 TDS 84300 74600 84100 79900 80200 83800 92200 87000 88200 93100 85900 99900 94300 89500 95700 Conductivity (umhos/cm) NA NA 88700 60200 51400 52900 51100 54100 58800 44500 52600 58200 55700 53900 53200 Metals (ug/L) Arsenic 26900 19300 14200 23500 17800 19400 21000 19800 13300 16900 21100 19600 23000 18000 19300 Beryllium 298 245 271 267 231 251 262 197 275 259 261 241 280 284 217 Cadmium 5500 5840 5510 6370 5580 5290 5780 6480 6260 6610 6790 6380 6500 5220 5890 Chromium 2750 2450 2230 2510 2380 2350 2290 1630 1840 1630 2290 2100 2100 1860 1810 Cobalt 46500 43800 38700 48200 42500 48700 44900 46700 46000 46100 50600 46900 54000 40800 42700 Copper 106000 154000 170000 148000 132000 138000 137000 126000 143000 156000 148000 136000 160000 93900 139000 Iron 2770000 3310000 3230000 2720000 2960000 2850000 2810000 2180000 3000000 3410000 3430000 3030000 3600000 2420000 2840000 Lead 566 528 403 586 501 619 515 638 268 484 593 589 590 400 562 Manganese 117000 130000 160000 144000 123000 141000 122000 98000 136000 149000 151000 137000 170000 133000 138000 Mercury ND ND <0.5 <4 11. l 1.9 <0.5 <0.0020 <0.5 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 <0.2 0.058 <0.2 Molybdenum 4080 3190 2240 4630 3510 3610 3650 4250 2010 3360 4060 3340 3200 2170 3090 Nickel 123000 122000 108000 126000 111000 125000 108000 127000 120000 134000 133000 121000 140000 104000 119000 Selenium 422 647 726 844 714 711 678 1020 631 615 683 635 1300 585 657 Silver ND ND <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <100 <20 <100 <100 <100 <50 6 5 Thallium 361 703 368 470 371 338 278 402 233 212 373 374 390 2190 1580 Tin ND ND <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <17000 <100 <17000 <17000 <17000 <50 <50 <50 Uranium 23000 29200 29900 30600 27100 33400 22800 26400 27200 27300 28600 25200 29000 18600 24300 Vanadium 409000 463000 536000 469000 454000 475000 452000 497000 513000 497000 534000 516000 500000 345000 450000 Zinc 767000 750000 582000 652000 574000 639000 631000 405000 702000 764000 760000 728000 850000 816000 674000 Radiologies (pCi/LJ Gross Alpha 1290 1570 1580 1000 1230 1370 2270 6890 7210 5660 4570 7520 3790 1630 1920 (2400)* voes (ug/L) Acetone 550 410 570 460 690 600 384 <700 599 473 551 551 449 501 522 Benzene ND ND <1 <l <l <l <l <5.0 <l <1 <1 <1 <1 <5 <5 Carbon tetrachloride ND ND <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <5.0 <1 <l <1 <1 <1 <5 <5 Chloroform 20 17 16 15 20 16 21.4 <70.0 18.6 15 17.1 17.1 16 13.7 15.9 Chloromethane 1.8 ND 2.2 2.3 2 3 2.04 <30.0 <l <1 1.46 1.46 2.2 <5 <5 Cell 2 Slimes Drain Chemical and Radiologkal Characteristics Constituents 2007 21)(18 2009 2010 2011 20)2 zoo 2014 l015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MEK 65 ND 100 83 130 100 95.5 <4000 102 80.3 58.4 58.4 135 74.0 89.9 Methylene Chloride ND ND <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <5.0 <1 <1 1.02 1.02 0.49 J <25 <25 Naphthalene 14 7.5 16 17 13 12 16.8 <100 16.2 11.9 10.1 10.1 13 7.65 7.15 Tetrahydrofuran 15 NA <100 <10 <10 3.2 3.98 <46.0 2.16 <1 2.88 2.88 <10 <25 <25 Toluene 1.7 ND 2.6 2.6 3 2 3.23 <1000 3.74 2.94 3.20 3.20 2.4 <5 <5 Xylenes 1.5 ND <1 2.2 <1 2 5.97 <10000 <1 <1 <1 <1 0.51 J <15 <15 $ViOCS (ug/L) 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30 <30 1,2-Dichlorobenzene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30 <30 1,3-Dichlorobenzene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30 <30 1,4-Dichlorobenzene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30 <30 1-Methylnaphthalene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 11 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 12 <3.0 11.6 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30 <30 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30 <30 2,4-Dichlorophenol NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30 <30 2,4-Dimethylphenol NA NA <51 <20 <20 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30 <30 2,4-Dinitrophenol NA NA <11 <10 <10 <20 <20 <20 <20 <10 <10 <9.03 <50 <50 <50 2,4-Dinitrotoluene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30 <30 2,6-Dinitrotoluene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30 <30 2-Chloronaphthalene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <4.1 <4.10 2-Chlorophenol NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30 <30 2-Methylnaphthalene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 11 <10 11.1 <10 <9.03 11 <3 10.4 2-Methylphenol NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30 <30 2-Nitrophenol NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30 <30 3&4-Methylphenol NA NA <21 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <37 <37 3 ,3 '-Dichlorobenzidine NA NA <51 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <46 <33 <33 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <50 <30 <30 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30 <30 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30 <30 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether NA NA <51 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30 <30 4-Nitrophenol NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <50 <30 <30 Acenaphthene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3 <3 Acenaphthylene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3 <3 Anthracene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3 <3 Azobenzene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30 <30 Benz(a)anthracene NA NA <21 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3 <3 Benzi dine NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <92 <39 <39 Benzo( a)pyrene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3 <3 Benzo(b )fluoranthene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3 <3 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3 <3 Benzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3 <3 B is(2-chloroethoxy )methane NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3 <30 Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30 <30 Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30 <30 Cell 2 Slimes Drain Chemical and Radiological Characteristics Constituents-2007 2008 2009 io10 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015, 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 1.1 <3 <3 Butyl benzyl phthalate NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3 <3 Chrysene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3 <3 Dibenz( a,h )anthracene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3 <3 Diethyl phthalate NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3 <3 Dimethyl phthalate NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 1.5 <3 <3 Di-n-butyl phthalate NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3 <3 Di-n-octyl phthalate NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3 <3 Fluoranthene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3 <3 Fluorene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3 <3 Hexachlorobenzene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30 <30 Hexachlorobutadiene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <28 <30 <30 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30 <30 Hexachloroethane NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <28 <30 <30 lndeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3 <3 Isophorone NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <35 <35 Naphthalene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 5.3 <3 <3 Nitrobenzene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30 <30 N-Nitrosodimethylamine NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30 <30 N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30 <30 N-Nitrosodiphenylamine NA NA <51 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30 <30 Pentachlorophenol NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <50 <30 <30 Phenanthrene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3 <3 Phenol NA NA <11 10.7 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30 <30 Pyrene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3 <3 Pyridine NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <18 <30 <30 * Sample was reanalyzed due to comparability with the duplicate sample. The reanalysis data are in (parenthesis). Cell2 LDS Chemical and Radiological Characteristics Constituent 2009 i010 2011 2012, 2013, 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 202-L Major Ions (mglL) Carbonate <1 <1 Bicarbonate 168 324 Calcium 711 615 Chloride 1750 1360 Fluoride 0.4 0.4 Magnesium 596 454 Nitrogen-Ammonia 32.6 0.7 Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Nitrogen-Nitrate 2.8 2.2 Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Potassium 22 13 Sodium 412 318 Sulfate 2700 1780 pH (s.u.) 6.6 7.36 TDS 6750 5310 Conductivity (umhos/cm) 11000 6500 Metal!> (iiglL) Arsenic <5 <5 Beryllium <0.50 <0.50 Cadmium 33.4 1.1 Chromium <25 <25 Cobalt 314 <10 Copper 59 12 Iron 208 37 Lead <1.0 <1.0 Manganese 1810 395 Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Mercury <0.50 0.52 Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Molybdenum 21 13 Nickel 948 <20 Selenium 7.9 9.4 Silver <10 <10 Thallium 0.92 <0.50 Tin <100 <100 Uranium 83.8 79.6 Vanadium 22 <15 Zinc 4220 78 Cell 2 LOS Chemical and Radiological Characteristics Constitl1enf 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2Q14 '.2015 2016 201:7 2p1s 2019 2020 20.2:1 -}Jadiologjcs ~pGVL) Gross Alpha 13.5 7.3 Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled VOCS(ug/L) Acetone <20 <20 Benzene <1 <l Carbon tetrachloride <1 <1 Chloroform <1 <l Chloromethane <1 <l Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not MEK <20 <20 Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Methylene Chloride <1 <1 Naphthalene <l <l Tetrahydrofuran <100 6.13 Toluene <1 <l Xylenes <1 <1 SVOCS (trg1L) - 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene NA <10 1,2-Dichlorobenzene NA <10 1,3-Dichlorobenzene NA <10 1,4-Dichlorobenzene NA <10 1-Methy !naphthalene NA <10 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol NA <10 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol NA <10 2,4-Dichlorophenol NA <10 2,4-Dimethylphenol NA <10 2,4-Dinitrophenol NA <20 Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not 2,4-Dinitrotoluene NA <10 Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled 2,6-Dinitrotoluene NA <10 2-Chloronaphthalene NA <10 2-Chlorophenol NA <10 2-Methylnaphthalene NA <10 2-Methylphenol NA <10 2-Nitrophenol NA <10 3&4-Methylphenol NA <10 3,3, -Dichlorobenzidine NA <10 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol NA <10 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether NA <10 Cell2 LDS Chemical and Radiological Characteristics Gonst1tu.ent 2009 201,0 %011 20U 2013 2014 2015 2016 20M 2018 2019 2020 BS 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol NA <10 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether NA <10 4-Nitrophenol NA <10 Acenaphthene NA <10 Acenaphthylene NA <10 Anthracene NA <10 Azobenzene NA <10 Benz(a)anthracene NA <10 Benzi dine NA <10 Benzo(a)pyrene NA <10 Benzo(b )fluoranthene NA <10 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene NA <10 Benzo(k)fluoranthene NA <10 Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane NA <10 Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether NA <10 Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether NA <10 Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate NA <10 Butyl benzyl phthalate NA <10 Chrysene NA <10 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene NA <10 Diethyl phthalate NA <10 Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Dimethyl phthalate NA <10 Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Di-n-butyl phthalate NA <10 Di-n-octyl phthalate NA <10 Fluoranthene NA <10 Fluorene NA <10 Hexachlorobenzene NA <10 Hexachlorobutadiene NA <10 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene NA <10 Hexachloroethane NA <10 Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene NA <10 Isophorone NA <10 Naphthalene NA <10 Nitro benzene NA <10 N-Nitrosodimethylamine NA <10 N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine NA <10 N-Nitrosodiphenylamine NA <10 Pentachlorophenol NA <10 Phenanthrene NA <10 Phenol NA <10 Pyrene NA <10 Pyridine NA <10 Cell 3 ermca an a 10 Ol!lC arac eris 1cs Ch . I d R d. I . aJ Ch t . f 2013 .. 2018 ! Constituent i· 1987 2003 (Avg) 2007 (Avg) 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ReSample 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 ReSample 2019 2020 2021 Major Ions (mw'L) Carbonate NA <I ND ND <l <l <I <I <l NS <l <I <LOO <LOO <LOO NS <5 236 Bicarbonate <5 NA ND ND <I <I <I <l <l NS <l <I <LOO <1.00 <LOO NS <5 175 Calcium 300 418 887 478 628 560 200 591 586 NS 294 713 148 526 498 NS 510 3 Chloride NA 2460 15965 15400 17200 3470 40400 8880 38400 NS 7200 22800 115000 2720 55200 NS 15000 500 Fluoride <100 667 42.8 L4 0.6 54.8 64.l 2300 12400 NS 1330 5410 46500 189 7400 NS 1340 2.2 Magnesium 5400 3386 15767 13100 17100 2500 22100 5680 15400 NS 1910 12700 31000 84400 22000 NS 10000 11 Nitrogen-Ammonia 13900 1302 13867 9010 21600 2650 6470 6840 100 NS 3030 8.91 6270 88.5 9490 NS 9000 Not 278 Nitrogell-Nitrate <100 20 102 44 142 26 261 64 277 NS 59.5 26.6 582 107 710 NS 925 Sampled-12.2 Potassium NA 254 6657 4760 3820 782 2590 1190 2110 NS 386 1620 3120 133 1480 NS 630 Dry 20 Sodium 5900 3198 25583 22900 28600 5620 47900 6660 34400 NS 3630 23800 59800 2120 46900 NS 14000 1210 Sulfate 180000 33400 173667 167000 214000 40400 197000 80000 440000 NS 37000 158000 834000 9970 208000 NS 96000 1630 pH (s.u.) 0.82 2.28 1.6 L79 1.4 2.18 L27 2.4 L05 NS 2.2 L72 <1.00 3.63 1.32 NS 3.88 10 TDS 189000 51633 228500 193000 243000 56200 296000 120000 410000 NS 70100 238000 887000 17300 327000 NS 143000 3930 Conductivity (umhos/cm) NA NA NA NA 304000 59800 86400 80300 84300 NS 56200 121000 13600 20300 104000 NS 95500 5870 Metals (ug/L) Arsenic 163000 32867 256500 489000 ND 52900 263000 4340 66000 NS 2920 21500 194000 870 20900 NS 380 170 Beryllium 540 430 913 840 905 206 1570 678 2570 NS 222 1520 12500 590 2950 NS 350 <l Cadmium 2600 1958 9260 15400 ND 1960 12200 3460 24000 NS 2550 14800 41000 1190 52100 NS 7400 2 Chromium 12000 3742 14883 12800 ND 3360 22800 10900 30600 NS 2380 15300 76200 <100 25100 NS 230J <5 Cobalt 48000 NA 82783 57000 ND 13000 76000 76100 99700 NS 20800 72500 74200 4440 120000 NS 64000 <100 Copper 360000 87333 505000 345000 ND 89000 768000 379000 954000 NS 139000 511000 3000000 9720 515000 NS 35000 454 Iron 2100000 1278333 4874500 4400000 5970000 1460000 10200000 3400000 9700000 NS 688000 4570000 15400000 262000 13300000 NS 2500000 519 Lead <20000 2507 9647 16900 ND 17200 16700 1860 14400 NS 1900 9090 4030 15.8 20500 NS <75 2 Mangane-se 82000 144000 496833 313000 ND 101000 587000 3110000 2470000 NS 214000 1270000 5690000 102000 4070000 NS 1000000 Not 47 Mercury ND NA ND 16 ND <4 30.9 9.6 2L6 NS 2.4 7.01 873 <2.00 430 NS 0.20 Sampled -<I Molyhdenum 52000 12250 122167 209000 14 21300 96200 790 56100 NS 2930 12500 133000 70.1 3740 NS 550 Dry 759 Nickel 170000 20917 131833 241000 ND 23800 75800 150000 122000 NS 44900 121000 29200 7220 113000 NS 150000 33 Selenium <2000 910 5856 10200 ND 3080 6900 2460 7060 NS 1370 4330 3170 306 3680 NS 2900 135 Silver <2500 NA 305 1010 ND 101 792 1850 3380 NS 329 1790 6780 <100 3770 NS 110 <I Thallium 4700 NA 446 1200 ND 190 518 1080 694 NS 290 602 2160 21.3 3760 NS 170 l.6 Tin NA NA 1090 1070 ND 155 325 <100 <100 NS <17000 <100 <17000 <17000 <17000 NS <50 <50 Uranium 118000 67833 332333 636000 3690 180000 458000 835000 1200000 NS 134000 530000 5360000 9630 1110000 NS 19000 533 Vanadium 210000 158333 935000 1130000 ND 692000 2370000 836000 3220000 NS 454000 1720000 10300000 5600 2420000 NS 54000 6740 Zinc 590000 NA 748833 515000 ND 134000 726000 652000 1430000 NS 155000 899000 7810000 68100 2100000 NS 950000 114 RadioTo~cs (pCi/L) 94900 Not Gross Alpha NA 1015831 16533 21700 17000 4030 11100 1530 81900 NS 19700 (8/4/2015) 86000 292 19700 NS 3890 Sampled-<18.5 8780 (5/28/2015) Dry Cell 3 enuca an .a 10 oe1ca arac eris 1cs Ch . I d R d' I . I Ch t . f 2013 2018 Constituent 1987 2003 (Avg) 2007 (Avg) 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ReSample 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 ; ReSample 2020 2021 I 2019 11 voes (og/L) Acetone 28 NA 80 100 67 37 330 64 302 159 <700 82.8 <200 48.4 135 NS 135 46.6 Benzene <5 NA ND ND <1 <I <I <I <5 <I <5.0 <I <I <I <l NS <I <5 Carbon tetrachl01ide <5 NA ND ND <l <I <I <l <5 <I <5.0 <I <I <l <I NS <I <5 Chloroform 6 NA ND 11 4.2 2.6 31 2 56.3 21 <70.0 1.75 13.2 <I 5.02 NS 18 <5 Chloromethane NA NA ND ND 1.4 1.8 3.5 I <5 2.58 <30.0 1.03 19.8 <I 5.36 NS 2.8 Not <5 MEK NA NA ND ND <I <I 67 <20 <100 24.5 <4000 <20 <20 <20 <20 NS 34 Sampled -<25 Melbylene Chloride 10 NA ND ND <I <l 7.4 <I 6.95 <I <5.0 <I <l <I I0.4 NS 0.67 J Dry <25 Naphlhalene <10000 NA ND <10 <I 2.1 1.2 <I <5 <I <100 <l <l <I <1 NS 0.57 J <5 Telrahydrofuran NA NA 150 <20 <100 <10 <10 <I <5 <I <46.0 <I <I <l 3.01 NS <35.0 <25 Toluene <5 NA ND ND <I <1 <l <I <5 <I <1000 <I <I <1 <I NS <I <5 Xylenes <5 NA ND ND <l <1 <I <I <5 <I <10000 <I <1 <I <1 NS <I <15 SVOCS (ug/1..) 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA <II <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <IO <10 <1 ,490 <7.78 <10 <30 1,2-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA <II <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 <30 1,3-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA <II <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <IO <10 <IO <1,490 <7.78 <10 <30 1.4-Dichlorobenzenc NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <IO <10 <10 <10 <10 <1 ,490 <7.78 <10 <30 I-Methyl naphthalene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <l0.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <IO <1,490 <7.78 <10 <3 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol NA NA NA NA <II <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <l,490 <7.78 <10 <30 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 <30 2.4-Dichlorophenol NA NA NA NA <11 <IO <10 <10 <10.5 <IO <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 <30 2,4-Di methyl phenol NA NA NA NA <II <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <IO <10 <IO <10 <IO <1,490 <7.78 <IO <30 2,4-Dinitrophenol NA NA NA NA <53 <20 <20 <20 <21.1 <20 <20 <20 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <50 <50 2,4-Dini trotoluene NA NA NA NA <II <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 <30 2,6-Dinitrotoluene NA NA NA NA <II <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <IO <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 Not <30 2-Chloronaphthalene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 Sampled-<4.10 2-Chlorophenol NA NA NA NA <II <10 <10 <IO <10.5 <10 <IO <10 <10 <10 <1 ,490 <7.78 <10 Dry <30 2-Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA <II <IO <10 <10 <l0.5 <10 <IO <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <IO <3 2-Melhylpheuol NA NA NA NA <II <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <IO <10 <10 <IO <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 <30 2-NiLrophenol NA NA NA NA <II <IO <10 <10 <10.5 <IO <10 <10 <IO <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 <30 3&4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA <II <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <IO <IO <10 <IO <10 <1,490 <7.78 <IO <37 3.3 '-Dichlorobenzidine NA NA NA NA <21 <IO <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <IO <IO <10 <1,490 <7.78 <45 <33 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol NA NA NA NA <53 <IO <10 <IO <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <50 <30 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether NA NA NA NA <II <IO <10 <10 <10.5 <IO <10 <IO <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 <30 4-Chloro-3-methyl phenol NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <IO <1,490 <7.78 <10 <30 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1 ,490 <7.78 <10 <30 4-Nitrophenol NA NA NA NA <53 <10 <IO <10 <10.5 <10 <IO <10 <IO <10 <1 ,490 <7.78 <50 <30 Acenaphthene NA NA NA NA <II <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 <3 Cell 3 enuc an o ogica aracterisllcs Ch . al d Radi I . I Ch 2013 2018 I Constituent 1987 2003 (Avg) 2007 (Avg) 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ReSample 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 ReSample 2019 2020 2021 Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA <ll <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 <3 Anthracene NA NA NA NA <ll <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 <3 Azobenzene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 <30 Benz(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.S <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 <3 Benzi dine NA NA NA NA <21 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <IO <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 <39 Benzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA <ll <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <IO <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 <3 Benzo(b )fluoranthene NA NA NA NA <II <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <IO <3 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene NA NA NA NA <II <10 <10 <IO <10.5 <10 <10 <IO <10 <10 <l,490 <7.78 <10 <3 Benzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA <ll <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <IO <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 <3 Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <IO <10 <10 <l,490 <7.78 <10 <30 Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether NA NA NA NA <ll <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 <30 Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether NA NA NA NA <ll <10 <10 <10 <10.S <10 <10 <IO <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 <30 Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate NA NA NA NA <ll 10.6 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 <3 Butyl benzyl phthalate NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 <3 Chrysene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <IO <10 <IO <IO <1,490 <7.78 <10 <3 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <IO <10 <10 <IO <1,490 <7.78 <10 <3 Diethyl phthalate NA NA NA NA <I I <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <IO <10 <10 <l,490 <7.78 <IO <3 Dimethyl phthalate NA NA NA NA <I I <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <IO <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 Not <3 Di-n-butyl phthalate NA NA NA NA <ll <10 <IO <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 Sampled -<3 Di-n-octyl phthalate NA NA NA NA <ll <10 <10 <10 <10.S <IO <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 <3 Fluoranthene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.S <IO <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 Dry <3 Fluorene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1 ,490 <7.78 <10 <3 Hexachlorobenzene NA NA NA NA <ll <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 <30 Hexachlorobutadiene NA NA NA NA <I I <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7 .78 <27 <30 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <l.490 <7.78 <10 <30 Hexachloroethane NA NA NA NA <II <10 <IO <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <l,490 <7.78 <27 <30 Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <IO <1,490 <7.78 <IO <3 Isophorone NA NA NA NA <ll <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <IO <1,490 <7.78 <10 <35 Naphthalene NA NA NA NA <ll <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 <3 Nitrobenzene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <IO <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 <30 N-Nitrosodimethylamine NA NA NA NA <II <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <IO <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 <30 N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine NA NA NA NA <II <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <IO <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 <30 N-Nitrosodiphenylamine NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 <30 Pentachlorophenol NA NA NA NA <53 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <50 <30 Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA <II <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <IO <1,490 <7.78 <10 <3 Phenol NA NA NA NA <II <10 <IO <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <IO <l,490 <7.78 <10 <30 Pyrene NA NA NA NA <ll <10 <10 <IO <10.5 <IO <10 <10 <IO <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 <3 Pyridine NA NA NA NA <l l <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <IO <10 <10 <10 <IO <1,490 <7.78 <18 <30 1 Historic values reported for Gross Alpha from 1987 and 2003 are total gross alpha reported in pCi/L. All other gross alpha data are reported as Gross Alpha minus Rn & U. Cell 4A Chemical and Radiological Characteristics -Constituent 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Major Ions (mg/L) Carbonate <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <l <1 <l <1 <l <5 <5 <5 Bicarbonate <1 <l <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <l <1 <1 <5 <5 <5 Calcium 627 598 558 591 668 445 604 632 607 707 510 641 637 Chloride 4650 7350 5870 4980 4530 5900 6410 7040 8060 10100 8670 9120 12700 Fluoride 0.3 21.6 30.6 43 1130 1290 1660 2030 1420 2000 1650 1700 3190 Magnesi um 3250 4940 4720 2230 3660 2990 3910 3550 4360 7030 4100 4700 5020 Nitrogen-Ammonia 3140 5230 4930 1540 1340 2730 11 4770 924 9060 6700 10000 7250 Nitrogen-Nitrate 28 52 44 27 38.2 39.5 19.9 41.9 53.4 73.4 70.4 84 .8 112 Potassium 980 1440 1450 558 773 724 1020 915 1500 2020 1200 1660 1730 Sodium 5980 11300 11400 7130 6860 7190 9760 9580 12000 17600 15000 17700 18800 Sulfate 67600 87100 267000 64900 83300 64900 77200 126000 77800 116000 81300 85700 110000 pH (s.u.) 1.4 1.99 1.73 1.2 1.47 1.7 1.51 1.59 1.53 1.25 2.40 2.36 2.2 TDS 81400 107000 108000 76000 90000 97000 104000 124000 120000 147000 122000 139000 162000 Conductivity (umhos/cm) 131000 101000 82100 78100 66300 73000 89600 81300 89800 115000 81400 84000 91300 Metals (ug/L) Arsenic 626000 109000 86600 60500 73700 70000 82600 94400 l04000 125000 63000 71300 68600 Beryllium 296 215 323 167 247 190 281 320 440 538 420 485 448 Cadmium 1920 3670 2190 844 1450 1780 2090 2850 3360 3850 2500 3490 3540 Chromium 3220 7500 5900 5990 5220 4620 5460 7920 8520 9350 7200 9050 8820 Cobalt 9440 26500 22500 22900 22900 27500 26100 32800 37900 41000 28000 32800 30600 Copper 99200 168000 181000 433000 540000 556000 477000 566000 578000 683000 580000 617000 557000 Iron 2360000 2920000 3390000 3190000 2620000 2280000 3090000 3850000 4480000 5320000 3200000 3690000 3810000 Lead 5360 11800 11000 5270 11500 14800 11700 14000 15100 16400 9000 8680 8380 Manganese 178000 209000 131000 112000 143000 120000 181000 225000 261000 307000 210000 211000 214000 Mercury 1.19 <4 15.2 2.4 0.786 2.5 0.99 <2 2.30 2.52 2.1 3.4 3.7 Molybdenum 24300 43800 24200 58200 25500 40600 35400 43900 40800 59100 19000 25700 32600 Nickel 17100 40900 43500 41300 43300 54100 48700 61300 66800 71900 50000 58800 57100 Selenium 4620 5810 4460 1310 2080 2000 2400 2820 4450 5870 3700 3660 3740 Silver 78 193 216 127 144 197 186 305 379 521 310 487 466 Thallium 162 350 410 250 256 376 436 568 169 727 90 524 185 Tin 257 378 319 169 118 <17000 142 <17000 <17000 <17000 77 181 105 Uranium 118000 217000 153000 91000 112000 159000 171000 214000 193000 244000 35000 42600 43300 Vanadium 918000 1090000 730000 237000 461000 535000 577000 715000 972000 1080000 150000 205000 237000 Zinc 142000 224000 286000 200000 183000 169000 237000 318000 344000 406000 280000 350000 307000 Radiologies (pCi/L) 176000 Gross Alpha 8910 3400 8290 16300 15800 240000 (8/4/2015) 292000 133000 516000 261000 52400 122000 37800 (5/28/2015) Cell 4A Chemical and Radiological Characteristics Constituent--2009 io10 2011 I 20112 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 voes (u~) . Acetone 60 55 100 25 28.4 <700 42.5 45.1 21.4 42.7 39 J 16.2 <25 Benzene <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <5.0 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2.5 <1 <5 Carbon tetrachloride <1 <1 <1 <l <1 <5.0 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2.5 <1 <5 Chloroform 4 8.5 10 <1 <1 <70.0 <1 <1 <1 1.91 l.9J 1.50 <5 Chloromethane 3.4 5.5 7.9 <1 <1 <30.0 <1 <1 1.35 1.76 1.7 J 1.90 <5 MEK <1 <1 <1 <1 <20 <4000 <20 <20 <20 <20 13 J <5 <25 Methylene Chloride <1 <1 <1 <20 <1 <5.0 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2.5 <5 <25 Naphthalene 1.8 <1 <1 <1 <1 <100 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2.5 <1 <5 Tetrahydrofuran <100 <10 <10 1.36 <1 <46.0 <1 12.6 <1 <1 <35.0 <5 <25 Toluene <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1000 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2.5 <1 <5 Xylenes <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10000 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2.5 <3 <5 SVOCS (ug/L) 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30 <30 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30 <30 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30 <30 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30 <30 1-Methylnaphthalene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3.0 <3 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30 <30 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30 <30 2,4-Dichlorophenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30 <30 2,4-Dimethylphenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30 <30 2,4-Dinitrophenol <53 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <10 <10 <8.57 <50 <50 <50 2,4-Dinitrotoluene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30 <30 2,6-Dinitrotoluene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30 <30 2-Chloronaphthalene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <4.1 <4.10 2-Chlorophenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30 <30 2-Methy !naphthalene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3 <3 2-Methylphenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30 <30 2-Nitrophenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30 <30 3&4-Methylphenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <37 <37 3,3 '-Dichlorobenzidine <21 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <46 <33 <33 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol <53 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <50 <30 <30 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30 <30 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30 <30 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30 <30 4-Nitrophenol <53 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <50 <30 <30 Acenaphthene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3 <3 Acenaphthylene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3 <3 Anthracene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 1.2 <3 <3 Azobenzene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30 <30 Cell 4A Chemical and,Radiological Characteristics ConiStiJ;ue.nt 2Q'Q9 am 2011 2012 W13 2014 2QlS 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Benz( a)anthracene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3 <3 Benzidine <21 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <39 <39 Benzo( a)pyrene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3 <3 Benzo(b )fluoranthene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3 <3 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3 <3 Benzo(k)fluoranthene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3 <3 B is(2-chloroethoxy )methane <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3 <30 Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30 <30 Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30 <30 Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate <11 19.6 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3 <3 Butyl benzyl phthalate <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3 <3 Chrysene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3 <3 Dibenz( a,h)anthracene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3 <3 Diethyl phthalate <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3 <3 Dimethyl phthalate <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3 <3 Di-n-butyl phthalate <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3 <3 Di-n-octyl phthalate <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3 <3 Fluoranthene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3 <3 Fluorene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3 <3 Hexachlorobenzene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30 <30 Hexachlorobutadiene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <28 <30 <30 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30 <30 Hexachloroethane <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <28 <30 <30 Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3 <3 Isophorone <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <35 <35 Naphthalene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3 <3 Nitro benzene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30 <30 N-Nitrosodimethylamine <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30 <30 N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30 <30 N-Nitrosodiphenylamine <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30 <30 Pentachlorophenol <53 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <50 <30 <30 Phenanthrene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3 <3 Phenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30 <30 Pyrene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3 <3 Pyridine <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 34.0 <19 <30 <30 Cell 4A LDS Chemical and Radiological Characteristics Constituent 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 --Major Ions (8'g/L) Carbonate <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <5 <5 <5 Bicarbonate <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <5 <5 <5 Calcium 558 474 470 453 429 336 510 446 542 516 520 496 500 Chloride 7570 4670 6040 2710 1910 4200 2860 5200 8610 4360 7360 3860 6510 Fluoride 0.7 39.4 46 27 1970 1320 282 1150 1370 716 1530 500 2240 Magnesium 6390 3240 5100 2070 1710 2690 2730 3940 4630 3820 3800 3690 3780 Nitrogen-Ammonia 4480 2290 3480 1320 1010 2920 13.4 5050 846 4580 6080 3050 3680 Nitrogen-Nitrate 69 183 94 15 28.9 39 27.4 40.9 63.1 44.0 58.2 60.2 161 Potassium 1960 934 1500 503 305 415 245 675 1710 539 1000 334 635 Sodium 12600 6700 11000 3500 2930 4190 3490 8050 11500 6780 13000 5260 9550 Sulfate 92400 41700 77400 39600 31400 56000 50500 91300 89100 68600 72600 59900 72900 pH (s.u.) 1.98 2.53 2.32 2.1 2.32 2.4 2.29 2.04 1.50 1.88 2.39 2.25 2.4 TDS 117000 56900 93800 55400 49700 81900 65200 95400 142000 75300 112000 83800 105000 Conductivity (umhos/cm) 150000 49000 66600 39600 31300 53600 50200 62200 97900 63400 75600 53200 65900 Metals ( ug/L) Arsenic 133000 54000 74700 44100 35700 51200 10400 43500 117000 42400 52000 16600 32300 Beryllium 536 295 367 180 188 185 199 289 479 298 370 317 323 Cadmium 4010 2650 3160 921 1170 4720 4270 4500 4080 3740 1900 4410 4220 Chromium 9140 3890 5940 3930 2630 2780 1760 4250 9410 3930 6500 2820 5200 Cobalt 37300 15200 21700 22300 44300 41200 33700 32100 42700 30600 25000 45800 73400 Copper 222000 116000 150000 481000 754000 439000 160000 331000 650000 376000 500000 273000 322000 Iron 3940000 1420000 2530000 2460000 1370000 1850000 1320000 2330000 5140000 2090000 2500000 1440000 1370000 Lead 5270 3400 4520 2300 165 991 46.8 797 15500 118 4200 254 1120 Manganese 389000 157000 207000 95200 86300 98600 96700 184000 296000 136000 190000 137000 195000 Mercury 2.66 6.2 14.7 0.7 <0.5 <0.0020 <0.5 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 1.4 0.20 0.30 Molybdenum 49200 23900 29300 10200 1200 3970 278 10700 49900 2350 8400 2190 4090 Nickel 43900 23900 29600 35000 54600 99300 86300 72700 74700 70900 46000 110000 67700 Selenium 5250 2820 3780 1260 1020 2170 649 1590 4940 1550 3100 1230 1960 Silver 204 62 127 44 24.8 <100 25.6 144 312 <100 230 150 212 Thallium 252 194 290 332 171 522 218 439 550 281 55 425 245 Tin 504 180 119 <100 <100 <17000 <100 <17000 <17000 <17000 <70 <500 <50 Uranium 284000 145000 168000 90200 75000 82200 25000 116000 247000 78600 38000 48000 76000 Vanadium 1150000 518000 770000 240000 157000 510000 253000 449000 1090000 475000 130000 374000 458000 Zinc 298000 152000 204000 181000 163000 306000 510000 502000 385000 446000 210000 541000 380000 "' Radiologies (pCi/L) - 17200 Gross Alpha 7020 3230 7440 4730 6930 61800 (8/4/2015) 98700 176000 51000 163000 5450 23700 1670 (5/28/2015) Cell4ALDS Chemical and Radiological Characteristics C;onstituent 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 voes (ugtL) Acetone 240 130 120 55 57 <700 84.7 61.5 79.8 108 84 90.3 262 Benzene <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <5.0 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <5 <5 Carbon tetrachloride <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <5.0 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <5 <5 Chloroform 23 52 26 42 110 95 129 84.5 21.6 33.8 31 120 47.2 Chloromethane 7.9 13 3.8 6 9.93 <30.0 5.35 <1.00 3.00 2.41 3.6 6.90 <5 MEK 78 50 82 36 <20 <4000 <20 <20 <20 <20 43 29.5 92.2 Methylene Chloride <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <5.0 <1 <1 <1 1.05 0.47 J <25 <25 Naphthalene <1 1.5 <1 1 2.35 <100 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <5 <5 Tetrahydrofuran 140 158 102 117 39.1 <46.0 18.5 <1 15.7 19.7 16 <25 <25 Toluene <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1000 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <5 <5 Xylenes <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10000 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <15 <15 SVOCS(~gtL) 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30 <30 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30 <30 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30 <30 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30 <30 1-Methylnaphthalene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3.0 <3 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30 <30 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30 <30 2,4-Dichlorophenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30 <30 2,4-Dimethy lphenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 11.1 <10 <30 <30 2,4-Dinitrophenol <54 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <10 <10 <9.08 <50 <50 <50 2,4-Dinitrotoluene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30 <30 2,6-Dinitrotoluene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30 <30 2-Chloronaphthalene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <4.1 <4.10 2-Chlorophenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30 <30 2-Methylnaphthalene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3 <3 2-Methylphenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30 <30 2-Nitrophenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30 <30 3&4-Methylphenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <37 <37 3,3 '-Dichlorobenzidine <22 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <46 <33 <33 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol <54 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <50 <30 <30 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30 <30 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30 <30 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30 <30 4-Nitrophenol <54 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <50 <30 <30 Acenaphthene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3 <3 Acenaphthylene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3 <3 Anthracene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3 <3 Azobenzene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30 <30 Cell 4A LDS Chemical and Radiological Characteristics ~D'S~:ltu.tm'fi ~ 2009 2Q10 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Benz(a)anthracene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3 <3 Benzidine <22 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <39 <39 Benzo(a)pyrene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3 <3 Benzo(b )fluoranthene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3 <3 Benzo(g,h,i )perylene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3 <3 Benzo(k)fluoranthene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3 <3 Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3 <30 Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30 <30 Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30 <30 Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate <11 54.9 54.9 16.6 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 1.1 <3 <3 Butyl benzyl phthalate <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3 <3 Chrysene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3 <3 Dibenz( a,h)anthracene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3 <3 Diethyl phthalate <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3 <3 Dimethyl phthalate <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3 <3 Di-n-butyl phthalate <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3 <3 Di-n-octyl phthalate <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3 <3 Fluoranthene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3 <3 Fluorene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3 <3 Hexachlorobenzene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30 <30 Hexachlorobutadiene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <28 <30 <30 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30 <30 Hexachloroethane <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <28 <30 <30 Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3 <3 Isophorone <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <35 <35 Naphthalene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3 <3 Nitrobenzene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30 <30 N-Nitrosodimethy !amine <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30 <30 N-N itrosodi-n-propylamine <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30 <30 N-Nitrosodiphenylamine <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30 <30 Pentachlorophenol <54 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <50 <30 <30 Phenanthrene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3 <3 Phenol 33 23.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30 <30 Pyrene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3 <3 Pyridine <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 12.9 <19 <30 <30 Cell 4B Chemical and Radiological Characteristics ,,_ Constituent 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Major Ions (mg/L) Carbonate <l <l <l <l <I <I <l <I <5 <5 <5 Bicarbonate <I <l <I <l <l <1 <l <1 <5 <5 <5 Calcium 570 580 662 366 655 523 473 664 670 628 534 Chloride 8290 8170 4570 7300 8500 12000 6930 7860 10500 10200 44800 Fluoride 26.7 23.3 1050 1150 1210 1780 1170 1410 2300 1730 7000 Magnesium 3910 4500 3560 3310 5530 5780 3550 5790 6500 4520 8200 Nitrogen-Ammonia 5220 5580 2060 5380 1.09 8690 724 7590 8150 6580 9100 Nitrogen-Nitrate 39 42 51.4 47 15.2 64.5 31.3 42.2 38.6 70.0 286 Potassium 1370 1650 1110 989 1700 1710 1230 1660 1900 1680 3540 Sodium 9050 11700 3150 7100 12800 14100 10600 15700 18000 17100 54000 Sulfate 134000 119000 98100 91500 108000 285000 708000 98400 124000 97200 259000 pH (s.u.) 1.87 1.5 1.65 1.6 1.35 1.26 1.41 1.24 1.53 2.24 1.2 TDS 98000 128000 108000 131000 149000 172000 103000 117000 180000 150000 423000 Conducti vity (umhos/cm) 76900 86900 72800 90100 115000 116000 93800 107000 99600 87300 109000 Metals (ug/L) Arsenic 67400 80000 65400 70400 106000 139000 82700 97800 140000 67900 307000 Beryllium 311 356 334 275 430 557 347 407 640 455 1280 Cadmium 1990 2540 1990 2290 2980 4260 2340 2520 2000 1800 6760 Chromium 6860 8280 6390 6940 7450 11900 7800 8630 12000 9350 16600 Cobalt 17800 29300 21300 24600 33700 46700 30300 32900 44000 30900 39700 Coooer 193000 340000 340000 368000 499000 684000 457000 539000 830000 602000 1170000 Iron 2960000 3580000 2830000 2480000 4340000 6340000 3690000 4400000 5800000 3690000 7610000 Lead 9960 11600 9820 10900 13400 17900 12200 12500 16000 8150 26000 Manganese 128000 148000 154000 129000 231000 325000 207000 242000 320000 201000 602000 Mercury 13.7 2.6 1.49 <0.0020 1.72 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 0.46 0.40 8.6 Molybdenum 21400 27600 26100 29000 39800 55400 22600 27400 29000 8110 95600 Nickel 33900 50500 35100 42000 56400 79600 53000 57800 78000 56400 48900 Selenium 4670 4470 3900 5010 5600 7300 3740 4510 6600 3540 9080 Silver 137 169 137 142 195 307 <100 160 170 76 741 Thallium 237 368 243 258 408 559 17.5 33.7 <100 165 2160 Tin 196 215 163 <17000 21 I <17000 <17000 <17000 340 138 879 Uranium 133000 171000 110000 133000 200000 278000 23100 28100 36000 47400 279000 Vanadium 660000 783000 163000 666000 881000 868000 746000 828000 710000 113000 1060000 Zinc 191000 270000 184000 144000 313000 476000 267000 323000 280000 334000 475000 ~ -Radiologies (pCi/L) 267000 Gross Alpha 8590 13600 14600 148000 (8/4/2015) 42500 262000 132000 320000 310000 54500 87400 (5/28/2015) voes (ug/L) Acetone 130 94 43.5 <700 56.2 86.4 38.6 56.8 39 12.7 97.6 Benzene <l <I <l <5 .0 <1 <I <l <I <l <I <5 Carbon tetrachloride <I <1 <l <5.0 <l <l <l <I <1 <I <5 Chloroform 9.4 4 8.06 <70.0 2.34 3.07 2.39 2.17 3.4 <l <5 Chloromethane 8.5 8 7.12 <30.0 3.62 6.01 1.26 1.72 2.1 1.28 <5 MEK <l <I <20 <4000 <20 <20 <20 27.4 15 J <5 57 Cell 4B Chemical and Radiological Characteristics Constituent 2011 2012 i013 2014 2'015 2016 2017 I 2018 2019 2()20 ®21 Methylene Chloride <1 <1 <1 <5.0 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <5 <25 Naphthalene <1 <1 <1 <100 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <5 Tetrahvdrofuran <10 11.1 <1 <46.0 <1 <1 <1 1.87 <35.0 <5 164 Toluene <1 <1 <1 <1000 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <5 Xylenes <1 <1 <1 <10000 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <3 <15 SV©C_ (ug/L) ·- 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30 <30 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30 <30 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30 <30 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30 <30 1-Methylnaphthalene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3.0 <3 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30 <30 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30 <30 2,4-Dichlorophenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <50 <30 <30 2,4-Dimethylphenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30 <30 2,4-Dinitrophenol <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <50 <50 2,4-Dinitrotoluene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30 <30 2,6-Dinitrotoluene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30 <30 2-Chloronaphthalene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <4.1 <4,10 2-Chlorophenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30 <30 2-Methylnaphthalene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3 <3 2-Methylphenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30 <30 2-Nitrophenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30 <30 3&4-Methylphenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <37 <37 3,3 '-Dichlorobenzidine <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <44 <33 <33 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <50 <30 <30 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30 <30 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30 <30 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30 <30 4-Nitrophenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <50 <30 <30 Acenaphthene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3 <3 Acenaphthylene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3 <3 Anthracene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 1.7 <3 <3 Azobenzene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30 <30 Benz( a )anthracene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3 <30 Benzidine <10 <10 <10 26 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <39 <39 Benzo(a)pyrene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3 <30 Benzo(b )fluoranthene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3 <30 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3 <30 Benzo(k)fluoranthene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3 <30 Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3 <30 Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30 <30 Cell 4B Chemical and Radiological Characteristics Constituent" 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30 <30 Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 410 19 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3 <3 Butyl benzyl phthalate <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3 <3 Chrysene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3 <3 Dibenz( a,h )anthracene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3 <3 Diethyl phthalate <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3 <3 Dimethyl phthalate <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3 <3 Di-n-butyl phthalate <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3 <3 Di-n-octyl phthalate <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3 <3 Fluoranthene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3 <3 Fluorene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3 <3 Hexachlorobenzene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30 <30 Hexachlorobutadiene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <26 <30 <30 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30 <30 Hexachloroethane <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <26 <30 <30 Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3 <3 Isophorone <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <35 <35 Naphthalene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3 <3 Nitro benzene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30 <30 N-Nitrosodimethylamine <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30 <30 N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30 <30 N-Nitrosodiphenylamine <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30 <30 Pentachlorophenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <50 <30 <30 Phenanthrene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3 <3 Phenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30 <30 Pyrene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3 <3 Pyridine <10 <10 <10 15 <10 <10 <10 31.7 <18 <30 118 Cell 4B LDS Chemical and Radiological Characteristics Constituent 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Major Ions (mg/L) Carbonate <1 <1 dry <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <5 <5 <5 Bicarbonate <1 <1 dry <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <5 <5 <5 Calcium 486 456 dry 308 538 547 516 592 550 555 526 Chloride 3630 6850 dry 6900 7960 8510 10400 8060 8050 7630 9180 Fluoride 28.4 22 dry 970 1150 1290 1050 1480 1680 1550 1870 Magnesium 3230 3360 dry 3400 5190 4780 5370 5580 4800 4830 4850 Nitrogen-Ammonia 4260 4090 dry 5240 2.43 7540 739 7510 7080 5080 4280 Nitrogen-Nitrate 30 31 dry 43 16.6 49.6 63.9 47.4 41.2 39.5 67.5 Potassium 1130 1060 dry 952 1560 1360 2130 1620 1400 1350 1240 Sodium 8240 8080 dry 6920 11900 10800 13200 14500 13000 12600 12200 Sulfate 59900 99100 dry 82300 104000 163000 117000 100000 89500 88700 99000 pH (s.u.) 2.23 2.4 dry 2.2 1.51 1.88 1.44 1.35 1.73 1.89 2.0 TDS 85800 90200 dry 129000 131000 133000 168000 132000 131000 134000 132000 Conductivity (umhos/cm) 63000 62400 dry 76300 106000 68400 105000 104000 80800 77600 78000 Metals (ug/L) ' Arsenic 54200 41200 drv 67800 98400 98800 135000 94100 89000 84900 74800 Beryllium 274 271 dry 282 411 430 559 416 470 483 318 Cadmium 1670 1740 dry 2290 2790 3250 4500 2610 2000 2060 2140 Chromium 6250 5930 dry 6160 7320 9470 13700 8980 9100 9620 8980 Cobalt 15600 19000 dry 23300 31100 33600 48900 31700 31000 32200 60300 Copper 176000 181000 dry 308000 458000 475000 681000 497000 550000 500000 423000 Iron 2450000 2120000 dry 2590000 4180000 4680000 5910000 4190000 4400000 4180000 3660000 Lead 6060 4420 dry 4120 10100 5860 14000 8770 7800 5110 1860 Manganese 118000 162000 dry 144000 222000 262000 346000 239000 240000 221000 213000 Mercury 12.3 3 dry 0.002 1.47 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 0.1 IJ 0.10 <0.2 Molybdenum 16700 15000 dry 24300 36300 35500 52900 25900 27000 19800 14300 Nickel 30700 33700 dry 40100 52600 58100 84400 56100 59000 57900 52000 Selenium 3710 2880 dry 4080 5080 5310 6860 4500 4700 3950 3870 Silver 111 117 dry 119 179 224 266 156 170 173 142 Thallium 179 175 dry 336 354 414 427 245 87 98 123 Tin 332 <100 dry <17000 198 <17000 <17000 <17000 200 258 141 Uranium 111000 132000 dry 143000 185000 192000 269000 54200 31000 34600 29400 Vanadium 518000 428000 dry 671000 817000 847000 1260000 811000 760000 743000 683000 Zinc 172000 182000 dry 144000 296000 315000 443000 303000 280000 286000 244000 -... Radiologies (pCi/L) 375000 Gross Alpha 6000 7500 dry 181000 (8/4/2015) 185000 165000 305000 226000 54100 105000 52500 (5/28/2015) Cell4B LOS Chemical and Radiological Characteristics Constituent ~2om 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 201~ 2019 2020 2021 'Vi'oes (ng/L) Acetone 390 370 drv <700 218 266 479 147 102 68.5 <25 Benzene <1 <1 dry <5.0 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <5 Carbon tetrachloride <1 <1 dry <5.0 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <5 Chloroform 20 19 dry <70.0 5.03 9.97 9.13 4.74 3.9 1.22 <5 Chloromethane 11 11 dry <30.0 9.72 10.8 7.16 2.4 2.3 <1 <5 MEK 240 180 dry <4000 71.8 53.6 89.4 34.6 71 42.8 <25 Methylene Chloride <1 <1 dry <5.0 <1 <1 1.01 <1 <1 <5 <25 Naphthalene <1 <1 dry <100 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <5 Tetrahydrofuran 198 322 dry 75.6 36.6 75.9 51.2 17.3 53 96.5 <25 Toluene <1 <1 dry <1000 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <5 Xylenes <1 <1 dry <10000 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <3 <15 svocs (ug/L) 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30 <30 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30 <30 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30 <30 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30 <30 1-Methylnaphthalene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3.0 <3 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30 <30 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30 <30 2,4-Dichlorophenol <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30 <30 2,4-Dimethylphenol <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30 <30 2,4-Dinitrophenol <20 <20 dry <20 <20 <20 <10 <8.79 <50 <50 <50 2,4-Dinitrotoluene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30 <30 2,6-Dinitrotoluene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30 <30 2-Chloronaphthalene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <4.1 <4.10 2-Chlorophenol <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30 <30 2-Methylnaphthalene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3 <3 2-Methylphenol <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30 <30 2-Nitrophenol <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30 <30 3&4-Methylphenol <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 0.42 <37 <37 3 ,3 '-Dichlorobenzidine <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <45 <33 <33 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <50 <30 <30 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30 <30 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30 <30 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30 <30 4-Nitrophenol <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <50 <30 <30 Acenaphthene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3 <3 Acenaphthy lene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3 <3 Anthracene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3 <3 Azobenzene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30 <30 Cell4B LDS Chemical and Radiological Characteristics Constjtud 2011 $'.(\q, : a,, 20l4 20lS 8 6' 2017 2018 2019 2020 2"021 Benz(a)anthracene <10 <10 drv <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3 <3 Benzidine <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <39 <39 Benzo(a)pyrene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3 <3 Benzo(b )fluoranthene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3 <3 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3 <3 Benzo(k)fluoranthene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3 <3 Bis(2-chloroethoxy )methane <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3 <30 Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30 <30 Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30 <30 Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 191 191 dry 27 <10 132 145 65.9 16 <3 43.1 Butyl benzyl phthalate <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3 <3 Chrysene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3 <3 Dibenz( a,h )anthracene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3 <3 Diethyl phthalate <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3 <3 Dimethyl phthalate <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3 <3 Di-n-butyl phthalate <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3 <3 Di-n-octyl phthalate <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3 <3 Fluoranthene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3 <3 Fluorene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3 <3 Hexachlorobenzene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30 <30 Hexachlorobutadiene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <27 <30 <30 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30 <30 Hexachloroethane <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <27 <30 <30 Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)ovrene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3 <3 Isophorone <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <35 <35 Naphthalene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3 <3 Nitro benzene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30 <30 N-Nitrosodimethylamine <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30 <30 N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30 <30 N-Nitrosodipheny lamine <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30 <30 Pentachlorophenol <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <50 <30 <30 Phenanthrene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3 <3 Phenol <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30 <30 Pyrene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3 <3 Pyridine <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 29.1 <18 <30 146 Cell 1 Additional Radiological Analyses Thorium-228 Thorium-230 Thorium-232 Radium-226 Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Specific Gravity <oCi/L) (pCi/L) <nCi/L) (pCi/L) (pCi/L) (pCi/L) (pCi/L) 8/4/15 1310 991000 6150 1110 141000 8920 140000 1.21 5/28/15 204 782000 6730 829 96700 5980 100000 1.13 8/30/16 ND 677000 4480 497 2380 45800 1.15 8/29/17 2890 8100000 76000 391 353000 20400 344000 1.17 8/1/18 ND 856000 8410 443 97300 6970 97200 1.16 8/21/19 1380 747000 4780 348 28400 1650 28700 1.15 8/21/2019 (Cell 65 -1500 663000 5720 434 25500 1960 27700 1.15 Duplicate of Cell I) 8/19/20 1090 1030000 6670 801 68300 4020 64600 1.33 9/1/21 469 174000 1060 424 218000 11800 221000 1.38 9/1/2021 (Cell 65 -500 178000 946 281 212000 10300 223000 1.33 Duplicate of Cell I) Thorium-228 Thorium-230 (pCi/L) (pCi/L) 8/4/15 ND 6680 8/30/16 ND 5050 8/29/17 ND 38500 8/1/2018 ND 7390 8/1/2018 (cell 65 - Duplicate ND 6860 of Cell 2 Slimes) 8/21/2019 ND 1750 8/19/2020 ND 5180 9/1/21 ND 2780 Cell 2 Slimes Drain Additional Radiological Analyses Thorium-232 Radium-226 Uranium- (pCi/L) (pCi/L) 233/234 (pCi/L) ND 36.6 11300 ND 52.4 11700 ND 51.2 111000 ND 36.2 14900 ND 29.8 10700 ND 62.5 9300 ND 86.0 8680 ND 63.0 9210 Uranium-Uranium-238 Specific Gravity 235/236 (pCi/L) (pCi/L) 858 10500 1.09 599 10700 1.03 ND 75600 1.07 ND 12500 1.07 3440 12600 1.06 484 9150 1.03 917 8760 1.08 582 9040 1.07 Cell 3 Additional Radiological Analyses Thorium-228 Thorium-230 Thorium-232 Radium-226 Uranium-Uranium-Uranium-238 Specific Gravity (pCi/L) (pCi/L) (pCi/L) (pCi/L) 233/234 (pCi/L) 235/236 (pCi/L) (pCi/L) 8/4/15 ND 123000 1640 448 184000 10300 191000 1.21 5/28/15 798 131000 1290 202 557000 37900 591000 1.29 8/30/16 983 72500 1670 584 1960000 130000 2060000 1.62 ~/jU/10 (cell 65 - Duplicate ND 67000 788 640 2520000 130000 2490000 1.53 of Cell 3) 8/29/17 ND ND ND 101 37600 ND 32800 0.989 8/1/18 ND 28100 2310 79.8 398000 24000 468000 1.21 8/21/19 ND 6610 ND 48.0 6640 ND 5780 1.07 8/19/20 Not Sampled -Dry 9/1/21 ND 31.2 ND ND 144 ND 209 0.984 Cell 4A 1tiona a 10 og1ca na yses Add" . I R d" I . I A I Thorium-228 Thorium-230 Thorium-232 Radium-226 Uranium-Uranium-Uranium-238 Specific Gravity (oCi/L) (oCi/L) (oCi/L) (oC.i/L) 233/234 (oCi/L) 235/236 (oCi/L) (oCi/L) 8/4/15 ND 374000 3490 663 57500 3720 64400 1.11 5/28/15 327 405000 3440 ND 61200 4030 62700 1.07 5/28/2015 (Cell 65 - Duplicate 265 315000 3790 772 58600 3020 58300 NS of Cell 4A) 8/30/16 ND 466000 2870 1050 61100 3320 70900 1.10 8/29/17 ND 4450000 47700 759 637000 30600 692000 1.09 8/29/17 (Cell 65 - Duplicate ND 4080000 11000 822 602000 44900 616000 1.12 of Cell 4A) 8/1/18 1970 539000 8230 59.2 88700 9900 86300 1.10 8/21/19 941 430000 2870 260 9350 674 10900 1.02 8/19/20 1040 521000 4130 395 17200 991 13700 1.10 8/19/2020 (Cell 65 - Duplicate ND 488000 2200 372 14100 1000 14300 1.11 of Cell 4A) 9/1/21 1000 662000 6240 686 18000 1150 17900 1.11 Thorium-228 Thorium-230 (pCi/L) (pCi/L) 8/4/15 ND 25300 5/28/15 ND 25300 8/30/16 ND 134000 8/29/17 ND 5410000 8/1/18 ND 76000 8/21/19 1060 366000 8/19/20 ND 39500 9/1/21 462 101000 Cell 4A LDS Additional Radiological Analyses Thorium-232 Radium-226 Uranium- (pCi/L) (pCi/L) 233/234 (pCi/L) ND 19.3 9380 ND 19.3 9380 1130 51.1 46200 49200 286 852000 ND 38.2 28800 2230 73.4 13500 ND 18.6 19000 731 33.4 38200 Uranium-Uranium-238 Specific Gravity 235/236 (pCi/L) (pCi/L) 504 10800 1.07 504 10800 NS 1900 40400 1.10 66200 851000 1.17 ND 30500 1.05 738 13000 1.02 711 16600 1.07 1720 37500 1.08 Cell 4B Additional Radiological Analyses Thorium-228 Thorium-230 Thorium-232 Radium-226 Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Specific Gravity <oCi/L) (oCi/L) (oCi/L) (oCi/L) (oCi/L) (oCi/L) (oCi/L) 8/4/15 ND 410000 2210 611 63500 3710 67000 1.12 5/28/15 122 346000 3790 544 65000 3870 66100 1.08 8/30/16 ND 595000 3510 715 90200 4090 90100 1.13 8/29/17 ND 3390000 56000 489 76000 8100 92700 1.07 8/1/18 ND 461000 7360 307 13700 ND 8420 1.08 8/21/19 1080 434000 3490 296 11600 563 10800 1.10 8/19/20 1280 606000 4320 360 17000 1080 17700 1.11 9/1/21 1590 523000 3240 495 58400 3780 60000 1.25 Thorium-228 Thorium-230 {oCi/L) foCi/L) 8/4/15 ND 452000 8/4/15 (Cell 65 - Duplicate ND 436000 ofCell 4B LOS) 5/28/15 334 487000 8/30/16 ND 368000 8/29/17 4680 5220000 8/1/18 1520 424000 8/21/19 1030 368000 8/19/20 888 541000 9/1/21 803 452000 Cell 4B LDS Additional Radiological Analyses Thorium-232 Radium-226 Uranium- (oCi/L) (oCi/L) 233/234 ( oCi/L) 3660 161 62600 4000 125 62600 5430 55.2 63500 1010 104 78600 43200 143 846000 5130 88.3 14300 2650 105 8840 4070 153 11700 3110 174 10700 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Specific Gravity (oCi/L) (oCi/L) 3890 60900 1.12 2680 61300 1.12 3900 65500 NS 3820 78900 1.11 64200 894000 1.07 ND 18400 1.09 412 9600 1.05 749 14500 1.11 631 11400 1.10 TabE Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables Table E-1 Holding Time Evaluation** e:ll I Oe<tl :ll Cdll eell4A a.I.I ~lt~B €-ib1l' C~ll lte,Jill!elil .111.@ltdhig "Fin: e JQ'.liililn 'ltme I1tlil!!nJ Soluli ns Ii.as ~e"luli ,ll$. ,,.,, s ~I'll 5.J>aiu Carbonate 14 days OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Bicarbonate 14 days OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Calcium 6 months OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Chloride 28 days OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Fluoride 28 days OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Magnesium 6 months OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Nitrogen-Ammonia 28 days OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Nitrogen-Nitrate 28 days OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Potassium 6 months OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Sodium 6 months OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Sulfate 28 days OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK pH (pH units) Immediately OK* OK* OK* OK* OK* OK* OK* OK* TDS 7 days OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Conductivity (umhos/cm) NIA OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 6 months ( except mercury which is 28 Metals days) OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Radiologies 6 months OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK VOCS (including THF) 14 days OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 7 days to extractton/40 svocs days for analysis OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK * Per the method, pH should be analyzed within 15 minutes· of sample collection. Due to the nature of the solution matrix, sample handling in the field is minimized and pH is measured by the laboratory upon receipt. This procedure change was requested by and approved by DWMRC. ** -The voluntary analyses conducted for specific gravity, thorium isotopes, uranium isotopes, and radium-226 are for informational purposes only. These analyses do not have QAP required holding times, and therefore, are not included in the holding time evaluation. E-2 Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check W@nk CO;J!Ci'er Nl!lmli>~ SetID Re.1>1~it '~'f> GEL-519405 2.0 °C EL -C20080962 5.1 ·c NIA= These shipments contained samples for the analysis of radionuclides only. Samples submitted for radionuclide analyses do not have a sample temperature requirement. E-3: Analytical Method Check -Routine Samples** Parameter QAP/Permit Method Method Used by. Lab Ammonia ( as N) A4500-NH3 G or E350.l E350.l Nitrate+ Nitrite (as N) E353. l or E353.2 E353.2 Metals E200.7 or E200.8 (Hg 245.1) E200.7 and E200.8 and E245.l (Hg) Gross Alpha E900.0 or E900.1 or E903.0 E903.0 voes SW8260B or SW8260C or SW8260D SW8260D Chloride A4500-Cl B or E300.0 E300.0 Fluoride A4500-F C or E300.0 A4500-FC Sulfate A4500-SO4 E or E300.0 E300.0 TDS A2540C A2540C Carbonate as CO3, Bicarbonate as HCO3 A2320B A2320B pH Not Specified A4500-H B Conductivity Not Specified A2510B SVOCs SW8270D SW8270D ** -The voluntary analyses conducted for specific gravity, thorium isotopes, uranium isotopes, and radium-226 are for informational purposes only. These analyses do not have QAP required methods, and therefore, are not included in the analytical method evaluation. E-4 Reporting Limit Evaluation** II Par.ameter ~-SJMfte·d, RL 1 Ammonia (as N) 25 mg/L Nitrate+ Nitrite (as N) 10 mg/L Metals ug/L Arsenic 50 Beryllium 4 Cadmium 5 Chromium 100 Cobalt 730 Copper 1300 Iron 11000 Lead 15 Manganese 800 Mercury 2 Molybdenum 40 Nickel 100 Selenium 50 Silver 100 Thallium 2 Tin 17000 Uranium 30 Vanadium 60 Zinc 5000 Gross Alpha 15 voes ug/L Acetone 700 Benzene 5 Carbon tetrachloride 5 Chloroform 70 Chloromethane 30 MEK (2-Butanone) 4000 Methylene Chloride 5 Naphthalene 100 Tetrahydrofuran 46 Toluene 1000 Xylenes 10000 Major Ions Chloride l.0mg/L Fluoride 4mg/L Sulfate 1000 mg/L TDS 1000 mg/L Carbonate as CO3, Bicarbonate as HCO3 * Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium, Sodium * SVOCs (from the 8270D LLD) ug/L 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 10 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 10 E-4 R porting Limit Evaluation** Parameter Permit-Specified RL 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 10 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 10 1-Methylnaphthalene 10 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 10 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 10 2,4-Dichlorophenol 10 2,4-Dimethylphenol 10 2,4-Dinitrophenol 50 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 10 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 10 2-Chloronaphthalene 10 2-Chlorophenol 10 2-Methylnaphthalene 10 2-Methylphenol 10 2-Nitrophenol 10 3&4-Methylphenol 10 3,3, -Dichlorobenzidine 20 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 50 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 10 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 20 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 10 4-Nitrophenol 50 Acenaphthene 10 Acenaphthylene 10 Anthracene 10 Azobenzene * Benz(a)anthracene 10 Benzidine * Benzo(a)pyrene 10 Benzo(b )fluoranthene 10 Benzo(g,h,i)pery lene 10 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 10 Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 10 Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether 10 Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether 10 Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate * Butyl benzyl phthalate 10 Chrysene 10 Dibenz( a,h)anthracene 10 Diethyl phthalate 10 Dimethyl phthalate 10 Di-n-butyl phthalate 10 Di-n-octyl phthalate 10 Fluoranthene 10 Fluorene 10 E-4 Reporting Limit Evaluation** Pal'amefer Pumirt,,Sp:eeilttm RL Hexachlorobenzene 10 Hexachlorobutadiene 10 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 10 Hexachloroethane 10 Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene 10 Isophorone 10 Naphthalene 10 Nitrobenzene 10 N-Nitrosodimethy lamine * N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 10 N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 10 Pentachlorophenol 50 Phenanthrene 10 Phenol 10 Pyrene 10 Pyridine * All analyses were reported to the required RLs unless noted in the text. * Reporting limits for these analytes are not specified in either the Permit or EPA Method 8270D. ** -The voluntary analyses conducted for specific gravity, thorium isotopes, uranium isotopes, and radium-226 are for informational purposes only. These analyses do not have QAP required reporting limits, and therefore, are not included in the reporting limit evaluation. E-5: Trip Blank Evaluation Lab Report Constituent Result liJnits 2-Butanone ND ug/L Acetone ND ug/L Benzene ND ug/L Carbon tetrachloride ND ug/L Chloroform ND ug/L 554861 Chloromethane ND ug/L Methylene Chloride ND ug/L Naphthalene ND ug/L Tetrahydrofuran ND ug/L Toluene ND ug/L Xylenes ND ug/L -up tea e E6D I' t S amp1e ea ,ve I RI f P ercen t o·rn , erence ** ~bjor lons (mg/1) Cell I ell 65 Rl>D '½ Carbonate <5 <5 NC Bicarbonate <5 <5 NC Calcium 234 211 10.3 Chloride 74700 67900 9.5 Fluoride 14900 12700 15.9 Ma2nesium 19800 17500 12.3 Nitro2en-Ammonia 5850 6800 15.0 Nitro2en-Nitrate 27.0 26.6 1.5 Potassium 4030 3530 13.2 Sodium 91900 70000 27.1 Sulfate 351000 323000 8.3 pH (s.u.) 0.4 0.5 22!2 TDS 584000 553000 5.5 Conductivity (umhos/cm) 76000 86800 13.3 Metals,fmr,m Arsenic 1040000 778000 28.8 Bervllium 3660 2820 25.9 Cadmium 21300 20900 1.9 Chromium 29600 25300 15.7 Cobalt 59500 46500 24.5 Copper 3760000 2850000 27.5 Iron 6680000 6790000 1.6 Lead 91200 68500 28.4 Manganese 1630000 1250000 26.4 Mercury 35 30 15.4 Molybdenum 418000 311000 29.4 Nickel 18400 17300 6.2 Selenium 21800 16300 28.9 Silver 2640 2300 13.8 Thallium 1680 2190 26.4 Tin 1820 1690 7.4 Uranium 655000 479000 31.0 Vanadium 4410000 3560000 21.3 Zinc 905000 755000 18.1 Radiolo2lcs (r,€1/1) Gross Alpha• 24600 25600 2.82 voes (mill,\ Acetone 152 154 1.3 Benzene <5 <5 NC Carbon tetrachloride <5 <5 NC Chloroform 46.2 52.8 13.3 Chloromethane <5 <5 NC MEK <25 <25 NC Methylene Chloride <25 <25 NC Naphthalene <5 <5 NC Tetrahvdrofuran <25 <25 NC Toluene <5 <5 NC Xvlcnes <15 <15 NC s:v.ocs,cu11/f.) -1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <37.5 <30 NC 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <37.5 <30 NC 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <37.5 <30 NC 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <37.5 <30 NC 1-Methylnaphthalene <3.75 <3.0 NC 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol <37.5 <30 NC 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol <37.5 <30 NC 2.4-Dichlorophenol <37.5 <30 NC 2,4-Dimethylphenol <37.5 <30 NC 2,4-Dinitrophenol <62.5 <50 NC 2.4-Dinitrotoluene <37.5 <30 NC 2,6-Dinitrotoluene <37.5 <30 NC 2-Chloronaphthalene <5.13 <4.1 NC E-6 Duplicllle Sample Relative Percent Difference** Majorlons(mg/1) Cell! Cell 65 RPO% 2-Chlorophenol <37.5 <30 NC 2-Methylnaphthalene <3.75 <3 NC 2-Methylphenol <37.5 <30 NC 2-Nitrophenol <37.5 <30 NC 3&4-Methylphenol <46.3 <37 NC 3,3 '-Dichlorobenzidine <41.3 <33 NC 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol <37.5 <30 NC 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether <37.5 <30 NC 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol <37.5 <30 NC 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether <37.5 <30 NC 4-Nitrophenol <37.5 <30 NC Acenaphthene <3.75 <3 NC Acenaphthylene <3.75 <3 NC Anthracene <3.75 <3 NC Azobenzene (1,2-Diphenylhvdrazine) <37.5 <30 NC Benz(a)anthracene <3.75 <3 NC Benzidine <48.8 <39 NC Benzo(a)pyrene <3.75 <3 NC Benzo(b)fluoranthene <3.75 <3 NC Benzo(i?;,h,i )perylene <3.75 <3 NC Benzo(k)fluoranthene <3.75 <3 NC Bi s(2-chloroethox v )methane <37.5 <30 NC Bis(2-chloroethvl) ether <37.5 <30 NC Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether <37.5 <30 NC Bis(2-ethvlhexvl) phthalate <3.75 <3 NC Butyl benzyl phthalate <3.75 <3 NC Chrvsene <3.75 <3 NC Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <3.75 <3 NC Diethyl phthalate <3.75 <3 NC Dimethyl phthalate <3.75 <3 NC Di-n-butyl phthalate <3.75 <3 NC Di-n-octyl phthalate <3.75 <3 NC Fluoranthene <3.75 <3 NC Fluorene <3.75 <3 NC Hexachlorobenzene <37.5 <30 NC Hexachlorobutadiene <37.5 <30 NC Hexachlorocyclopentadiene <37.5 <30 NC Hexachloroethane <37.5 <30 NC Jndeno(l .2.3-cd)pyrene <3.75 <3 NC Isophorone <43.8 <35 NC Naphthalene <3.75 <3 NC Nitrobenzene <37.5 <30 NC N-Nitrosodimethylamine <37.5 <30 NC N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine <37.5 <30 NC N-N itrosodiphenylamine <37.5 <30 NC Pentachlorophenol <37.5 <30 NC Phenanthrene <3.75 <3 NC Phenol <37.5 <30 NC Pvrene <3.75 <3 NC Pyridine 146 164 11.6 Highlighted cells indicate an RPD that exceeded the 20% RPD criteria Per the approved QAP, an RPD greater than 20% is acceptable if the reported results are less than 5 times the RL. These results are provided for information only. * Duplicate checks reported for gross alpha minus RN and U are not %RPO. Calculated values are based on the formula in the approved QAP. ** -The voluntary analyses conducted for specific gravity, thorium isotopes, uranium isotopes, and radium-226 are for informational purposes only. These analyses do not have QAP required duplicate requirements, and therefore, are not included in the duplicate evaluation. NC= Not Calculated. E-7 Radiologies Counting Error Qtio Alfi1~ lililln:tt Ru & COU1iltmg (,Jr, M!1i)fut U l~ei.ci je:rn El1(0r :S Wit,lt~n S•,101e '.l!IJ ~imum~\ ~ & U (:1::) 2'.0% GWQS OWQ.$ Cell I 24600 255 y 15 NA Cell 2 Slimes 1920 67.7 y 15 NA Cell 3 ND NA NC 15 NA Cell 4A 122000 507 y 15 NA Cell 4ALDS 23700 226 y 15 NA Cell 4B 87400 448 y 15 NA Cell 4B LOS 105000 510 y 15 NA Cell 65 (Duplicate of Cell 1) 25600 247 y 15 NA GWQS = Groundwater Quality Standard NA -the counting error is less than 20% of the activity as required by the GWDP and this check column is not applicable. NC= Not calculated. The sample results are nondetect and the check is not applicable. E-8: Laboratory Matrix QC Matrix pike % Recovery Comparison Lab Report Sample ID C21090172 NA C21090172 NA C21090172 NA C21090172 Cell 1 C21090172 Cell 1 C21090172 Cell 65 (Cell 1 duplicate) C21090172 Cell 1 C21090172 Cell 1 C21090172 Cell 1 C21090172 Cell I C21090172 Cell 1 C21090172 Cell l C21090172 Cell 1 C21090172 Cell 1 C21090172 Cell I C21090172 Cell 1 C21090172 Cell 1 C21090172 Cell 65 (Cell 1 duplicate) C21090172 Cell 65 (Cell 1 duplicate) 554861 Cell! NC= Not Calculated Analyte MS %REC Fluoride 11 I Ammonia 74 Ammonia 76 Vanadium* NC Sodium 62 Zinc* NC Arsenic* NC Cadmium* NC Chromium* NC Iron* NC Lead* NC Manganese* NC Molybdenum* NC Nickel* NC Selenium* NC Sodium* NC Uranium* NC Copper* NC Uranium* NC Gross Alpha 11.7 *= Analyte concentration is too high for accurate matrix spike recovery and/or RPO. NI A = QC was not performed on an EFRI sample. MSD %REC NIA 81 75 NC 63 NC NC NC NC NC NC NC NC NC NC NC NC NC NC 31.3 * Recovery was not calculated as the analyte level in the sample was greater than 4 times the spike amount LCS % Recovery [I LCSD Lab Report Sample ID Analyte LCS %REC %REC 554861 NA Benzidine 56 90 Laboratory Duplicate % Recovery Comparison All Laboratory Duplicates were within acceptance limits. Method Blanks Lab Report Lab Sample ID Analyte Blank Result RL C21090172 MB-63857 Molybdenum 0.1 0.05 C21090172 MB-63857 Tin 0.3 0.1 C21090172 MB-63857 Copper 0.2 0.2 C21090172 MB-63857 Uranium 0.2 O.Ql Surrogate % Recovery All surrogate recoveries were within acceptance limits. REC Range RPD 90 -110 NC 90 -110 6.6 90 -110 1.3 70 -J 30 NC 70 -130 0.5 70 -130 NC 70 -130 NC 70 -130 NC 70 -130 NC 70 -130 NC 70 -130 NC 70 -130 NC 70 -130 NC 70 -130 NC 70 -130 NC 70 -130 NC 70 -130 NC 70-130 NC 70 -130 NC 75 -125 15.3 REC Range RPD 13-141 46 Units ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L