DRC-2021-002283 - 0901a06880e0f070

Div of Waste Management
and Radiation Control
FEB 1 6 2021 Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. 225 Union Blvd. Suite 600 Lakewood, CO, US, 80228
ENERGYFUELS 303 974 2140
DI3C-Zo2(-002.2_6 3 www.energyfuels.com
VIA Expedited Delivery
February 10, 2021
Mr. Ty L. Howard
Director of Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144880
Salt Lake City, UT 84116
Re: Transmittal of Annual Seeps and Springs Monitoring Report
Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit UGW3700)4 White Mesa Uranium Mill
Dear Mr. Howard:
Enclosed are two copies of the White Mesa Uranium Mill Annual Seeps and Springs Monitoring
Report for 2020 as required by the Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit UGW370004, as well as
two CDs that contain a word searchable electronic copy of this report.
If you should have any questions regarding this report please contact me at 303-389-4134.
Yours very, truly,
ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC.
Kathy Weinel
Quality Assurance Manager
CC: David Frydenlund
Scott Bakken
Logan Shumway
Terry Slade
Garrin Palmer
VIA Expedited Delivery
February 10, 2021
Mr. Ty L. Howard
Director of Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144880
Salt Lake City, UT 84116
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Blvd. Suite 600
Lakewood, CO, US, 80228
303 974 2140
www.energyfuel. .c m
Re: Transmittal of Annual Seeps and Springs Monitoring Report
Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit UGW370004 White Mesa Uranium Mill
Dear Mr. Howard:
Enclosed are two copies of the White Mesa Uranium Mill Annual Seeps and Springs Monitoring
Report for 2020 as required by the Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit UGW370004, as well as
two CDs that contain a word searchable electronic copy of this report.
If you should have any questions regarding this report please contact me at 303-389-4134.
Yours very truly,
-f!~'Jr~
ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC.
Kathy Weinel
Quality Assurance Manager
CC: David Frydenlund
Scott Bakken
Logan Shumway
Terry Slade
Garrin Palmer
White Mesa Uranium Mill
2020 Annual Seeps and Springs Sampling Report
State of Utah
Groundwater Discharge Permit No. UGW370004
Prepared by:
'Z'l!!I ENERGYFUELS
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Blvd., Suite 600
Lakewood, CO 80228
February 10, 2021
Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 1
2.0 SAMPLING EVENTS ............................................................................................................................ 1
2.1 March 2020 Sampling ......................................................................................................................... 1
2.2 June 2020 Sampling ............................................................................................................................ 1
2.3 Repeat Visits to Dry Seeps and Springs .............................................................................................. 2
2.4 Sampling Procedures .......................................................................................................................... 2
2.5 Field Data ............................................................................................................................................ 3
2.6 Field QC Samples ............................................................................................................................... 3
3.0 SEEPS AND SPRINGS SURVEY AND CONTOUR MAP ................................................................. 3
4.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL. ..................................................................... 4
4.1 Laboratory Results ............................................................................................................................... 4
4.2 DATA EVALUATION ...................................................................................................................... 4
4.3 Adherence to Sampling Plan and Permit Requirements ..................................................................... 5
4.4 Analyte Completeness Review ........................................................................................................... 5
4.5 Data Validation ................................................................................................................................... 5
4.5.1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation ..................................................................................................... 5
4.5.2 Holding Time Evaluation ............................................................................................................. 5
4.5.3 Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check ...................................................................................... 5
4.5.4 Analytical Method Check ............................................................................................................ 6
4.5.5 Reporting Limit Evaluation ......................................................................................................... 6
4.5 .6 Trip Blank Evaluation .................................................................................................................. 6
4.5.7 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates .................................................................................. 6
4.5.8 Radiologies Counting Error ......................................................................................................... 7
4.5.9 Laboratory Matrix QC Evaluation ............................................................................................... 7
5.0 EVALUATION OF ANALYTICAL DATA .......................................................................................... 9
5.1 Evaluation of Analytical Results ......................................................................................................... 9
5.1. l Ruin Spring .................................................................................................................................. 9
5 .1.2 Cotton wood Spring ...................................................................................................................... 9
5.1.3 Westwater Seep .......................................................................................................................... 10
5.1.4 Entrance Spring .......................................................................................................................... 10
6.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT ..................................................................................................... 10
6.1 Assessment of Corrective Actions from Previous Period ................................................................. 10
7 .0 ELECTRONIC DATA FILES AND FORMAT ................................................................................... 11
8.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION ............................................................................................... 12
II
Table 1
Table 2A
Table 2B
Table 2C
Table 2D
LIST OF TABLES
Summary of Seeps and Springs Sampling
Detected Constituents and Comparison to Historic Values and Mill Site
Monitoring Wells -Ruin Spring
Detected Constituents and Comparison to Historic Values and Mill Site
Monitoring Wells -Cottonwood Seep
Detected Constituents and Comparison to Historic Values and Mill Site
Monitoring Wells -Westwater Seep
Detected Constituents and Comparison to Historic Values and Mill Site
Monitoring Wells -Entrance Spring
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Seeps and Springs Field Data Sheets and Photographic Documentation
Tab B Field Parameter Measurement Data
Tab C Survey Data and Contour Map
Tab D Analytical Laboratory Data
Tab E Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
E-1 Holding Time Evaluation
E-2 Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check
E-3 Analytical Method Check
E-4 Reporting Limit Evaluation
E-5 Trip Blank Evaluation
E-6 QNQC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
E-7 Radiologies Counting Error
E-8 Laboratory Matrix QC Evaluation
Tab F Comma Separated Values Transmittal
1l1
AWAL
DR
DWMRC
EFRI
GEL
GWQS
LCS
Mill
MS
MSD
Permit
QA
QAP
QC
RPD
TDS
voes
ACRONYM LIST
American West Analytical Laboratory
Dry Ridge Piezometers
Utah Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
GEL Laboratories, Inc.
Groundwater Quality Standard
Laboratory Control Spike
White Mesa Mill
Matrix Spike
Matrix Spike Duplicate
State of Utah Groundwater Discharge Permit No. UGW370004
Quality Assurance
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan
Quality Control
Relative Percent Difference
Total Dissolved Solids
Volatile Organic Compounds
lV
ANNUAL SEEPS AND SPRINGS SAMPLING REPORT
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This is the 2020 Annual Seeps and Springs Sampling Report for the Energy Fuels Resources
(USA) Inc. ("EFRI") White Mesa Mill (the "Mill"), as required under Part I.F.7 of the Mill's
State of Utah Groundwater Discharge Permit No. UGW370004 (the "Permit") and the Mill's
Sampling and Analysis Plan for Seeps and Springs, Revision: 2, July 8, 2016 (the "Sampling
Plan").
The Sampling Plan for Seeps and Springs was revised in July 2016 to incorporate changes
requested by the Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control ("DWMRC"). The
Sampling Plan for Seeps and Springs, Revision: 2, July 8, 2016 was approved by DWMRC by
letter dated August 8, 2016.
2.0 SAMPLING EVENTS
Seeps and springs which were identified near the Mill in the 1978 Environmental Report (Plate
2.6-10, Dames and Moore, January 30, 1978) are to be sampled annually in accordance with the
Sampling Plan and Part I.E.6 of the Permit. The Sampling Plan specifies the following sample
locations: Corral Canyon Seep, Corral Springs, Ruin Spring, Cottonwood Seep, Westwater Seep
and Entrance Spring (also referred to as Entrance Seep).
2.1 March 2020 Sampling
In accordance with the DWMRC-approved Sampling Plan, once per calendar quarter, Westwater
Seep, Corral Canyon Seep and Corral Springs are visited to determine if there is any water for
sampling. If sufficient water is present, a sample is collected and no further visits are required
for the remainder of the year. Westwater Seep, was visited in mid-March 2020 and water was
present. DWMRC informed EFRI that if water was noted in Westwater Seep during the first
quarter, they would travel to the site in order to collect a split sample. EFRI notified DWMRC
of the presence of water, however, due to COVID-19 travel restrictions, DWMRC was precluded
from traveling to the Mill. EFRI collected a sample on March 25, 2020. Corral Canyon Seep
and Corral Springs are discussed below.
2.2 June 2020 Sampling
In accordance with the Permit and the Sampling Plan, DWMRC was notified of the annual
sampling event. The DWMRC representative was present for this sampling event. On June 16,
2020, EFRI collected seeps and springs samples from Cottonwood Seep, Ruin Spring, Entrance
Seep, Westwater Seep and Back Spring (duplicate of Cottonwood Seep). The DWMRC
representative collected a "split" sample on June 16, 2020 from the EFRI sampling equipment,
using sample containers he provided. Corral Canyon Seep and Corral Springs were dry during
the annual sampling event.
1
2.3 Repeat Visits to Dry Seeps and Springs.
Corral Canyon Seep and Corral Springs, were visited once per calendar quarter in 2020. The
visits were conducted in February, May, July and October 2020. Corral Canyon Seep and Corral
Springs, were dry during all of the visits, could not be sampled, and did not warrant development
attempts with limited hand tool excavation at that time. In addition, during the June 16, 2020
sampling event, Corral Canyon Seep and Corral Springs were visited and were dry, could not be
sampled, and did not warrant development attempts with limited hand tool excavation at that
time.
2.4 Sampling Procedures
Samples were collected and analyzed for the parameters listed in Table 2 of the Permit.
Samples were collected from the locations indicated in Table 1. Sampling procedures for each
seep or spring are determined by the site location and access.
The DWMRC-approved sampling procedures for seeps and springs at the Mill are contained in
the Sampling Plan. Samples collected under this plan were collected either by direct collection
which involves collecting the sample directly into the sample container from the surface water
feature or from spring out-flow, or by using a stainless steel ladle to collect water until a
sufficient volume is contained in the ladle for transfer to the sample bottle. Filtered parameters
are pumped through a 0.45 micron filter prior to delivery to the sample bottle.
Ruin Spring
In the case of Ruin Spring, sample bottles for the analytes collected during the June sampling
event (except gross alpha and heavy metals) were filled directly from the spring out-flow which
is a pipe. Samples for heavy metals and gross alpha were collected by means of a peristaltic
pump and delivered directly to the sample containers through a 0.45 micron filter. The
appropriate preservatives for the analytical technique were added to the samples.
Westwater Seep
For Westwater Seep, all of the sample containers were filled by means of a peristaltic pump and
delivered directly to the sample containers. Samples for heavy metals and gross alpha were
collected by means of a peristaltic pump and delivered directly to the sample containers through
a 0.45 micron filter. The appropriate preservatives for the analytical technique were added to the
samples.
Cottonwood Seep and Entrance Spring
Cottonwood Seep and Entrance Spring were "developed" prior to the sampling event by Field
Personnel. Development was completed by removing surrounding vegetation and clearing the
sampling location in the spring or seep area. The sample containers were filled by means of a
peristaltic pump and delivered directly to the sample containers. In the case of the samples for
heavy metals and gross alpha, the samples were delivered by a peristaltic pump directly to the
2
sample containers through a 0.45 micron filter. The samples were preserved by the addition of
the appropriate preservative for the analytical technique.
The tubing on the peristaltic pump that comes into contact with the sample water was disposed of
between each sampling. As a result, no equipment required decontamination, and no rinsate
samples were collected.
2.5 Field Data
Attached under Tab A are copies of the field data sheets recorded in association with the March
and June seeps and springs monitoring events. Photographic documentation of the sampling
sites is also included in Tab A. Sampling dates are listed in Table 1 and field parameters
collected during the sampling program are included in Tab B.
2.6 Field QC Samples
The field Quality Control ("QC") samples generated during this sampling event included one
duplicate per sampling event and one trip blank per shipment to each laboratory which received
samples for VOCs. The duplicate samples (Back Spring) were submitted blind to the analytical
laboratory. As previously stated, no rinsate blanks were collected during this sampling event as
only disposable equipment was used for sample collection.
3.0 SEEPS AND SPRINGS SURVEY AND CONTOUR MAP
Part I.F.7(c) of the Permit requires that a water table contour map that includes the elevations for
each well at the facility and the elevations of the phreatic surfaces observed for each of the seeps
and springs sampled be submitted with this annual repo1t. Tab C includes two contour maps.
The contour map labeled C-1 shows the water table without the water level data associated with
the dry ridge ("DR") investigation piezometers. The contour map labeled C-2 shows the water
table with the water level data associated with the DR investigation piezometers. It is important
to note that Cottonwood Seep is not included in any of the perched water level contouring,
because there is no evidence to establish a hydraulic connection between Cottonwood Seep and
the perched water system. Cottonwood Seep is located near the Brushy Basin
Member/Westwater Canyon Member contact, approximately 230 feet below the base of the
perched water system defined by the Burro Canyon Formation/Brushy Basin Member contact.
The stratigraphic position of Cottonwood Seep indicates that its elevation is not representative of
the perched potentiometric surface. Exclusion of the Cottonwood Seep from water level
contouring is consistent with previous submissions. The contour map includes the corrected
survey data from December 2009 as discussed below.
Part I.F.7 (g) of the Permit requires that survey data for the seeps and springs be collected prior
to the collection of samples. DRC previously clarified that the requirement to submit survey data
applies only to the first sampling event and not on an annual basis. The December 2009 and July
2010 seeps and springs survey data shown in Tab C will be used for reporting where seeps and
springs locations and elevations are relevant.
3
A full discussion of the survey data and the hydro geology of seeps and springs at the margins of
White Mesa in the vicinity of the Mill and the relationship of these seeps and springs to the
hydrogeology of the site, in particular to the occurrence of a relatively shallow perched
groundwater zone beneath the site, is contained in Hydrogeology of the Perched Groundwater
Zone and Associated Seeps and Springs Near the White Mesa Uranium Mill Site, dated
November 12, 2010, prepared by Hydro Geo Chem, Inc. and submitted to the Director on
November 15, 2010. Additional information is also contained in the Second Revision
Hydrogeology of the Perched Groundwater Zone in the Area Southwest of the Tailings Cells
White Mesa Mill Site, dated November 7, 2012, prepared by Hydro Geo Chem, Inc. and
submitted to the Director on November 7, 2012.
4.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL
4.1 Laboratory Results
Analytical results are provided by the Mill's two contract analytical laboratories GEL
Laboratories, Inc., ("GEL") and American West Analytical Laboratory ("AWAL").
The laboratories utilized during this investigation were certified under the Environmental Lab
Certification Program administered by UDEQ Bureau of Lab Improvement for the analyses they
completed.
The analytical data as well as the laboratory Quality Assurance ("QA")/QC summaries are
included under Tab D.
4.2 DATA EVALUATION
The Permit requires that the annual seeps and springs sampling program be conducted in
compliance with the requirements specified in the Mill's approved White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan ("QAP"), the approved Sampling Plan and the
Permit. To meet this requirement, the data validation completed for the seeps and springs
sampling program verified that the program met the requirements outlined in the QAP, the
Permit and the approved Sampling Plan. The Mill QA Manager performed a QA/QC review to
confirm compliance of the monitoring program with requirements of the Permit and the QAP.
As required in the QAP, data QA includes preparation and analysis of QC samples in the field,
review of field procedures, an analyte completeness review, and quality control review of
laboratory data methods and data. Identification of field QC samples collected and analyzed is
provided in Section 4.5.1. Discussion of adherence to the Sampling Plan is provided in Section
4.3. Analytical completeness review results are provided in Section 4.4. The steps and tests
applied to check laboratory data QA/QC are discussed in Sections 4.5.1 through 4.5.9 below.
The analytical laboratories have provided summary reports of the analytical QA/QC
measurements necessary to maintain conformance with National Environmental Laboratory
Accreditation Conference certification and reporting protocol. The analytical laboratory QA/QC
Summary Reports, including copies of the Mill's Chain of Custody and Analytical Request
Record forms for each set of analytical results, follow the analytical results under Tab D. Results
4
of the review of the laboratory QA/QC information are provided under Tab E and discussed in
Section 4.5 below.
4.3 Adherence to Sampling Plan and Permit Requirements
On a review of adherence by Mill personnel to the Permit, the QA Manager observed that
QA/QC requirements established in the Permit and the QAP were met and that the requirements
were implemented as required except, as noted below.
The Permit only requires the measurement of the field parameters pH, conductivity and
temperature. Field parameter measurements collected during this sampling event included pH,
conductivity, temperature, redox potential, and turbidity.
4.4 Analyte Completeness Review
The analyses required by the Permit Table 2 were completed.
4.5 Data Validation
The QAP and the Permit identify the data validation steps and data quality control checks
required for the seeps and springs monitoring program. Consistent with these requirements, the
QA Manager performed the following evaluations: a field data QA/QC evaluation, a receipt
temperature check, a holding time check, an analytical method check, a reporting limit check, a
trip blank check, a QA/QC evaluation of sample duplicates, a gross alpha counting error
evaluation and a review of each laboratory's reported QA/QC information. Each evaluation is
discussed in the following sections. Data check tables indicating the results of each test are
provided under Tab E.
4.5.1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation
The QA Manager performs a review of field recorded parameters to assess their adherence with
QAP and Permit requirements. The assessment involved review of the Field Data sheets. Review
of the Field Data Sheets noted that the requirements for field data collection were met.
4.5.2 Holding Time Evaluation
QAP Table 1 identifies the method holding times for each suite of parameters. Sample holding
time checks are provided under Tab E. The samples were received and analyzed within the
required holding time.
4.5.3 Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check
Chain of Custody sheets were reviewed to confirm compliance with the sample receipt
requirements specified in the QAP. Sample receipt temperature checks are provided under Tab
E. The samples were received within the QAP required temperature limit.
5
4.5.4 Analytical Method Check
The analytical methods reported by both laboratories were checked against the required methods
specified in Table 1 of the QAP. Analytical method check results are provided in Tab E.
4.5.5 Reporting Limit Evaluation
Reporting limits utilized by the laboratory were required to be equal to or lower than the GWQSs
set out in Table 2 of the Permit. For Total Dissolved Solids ("TDS"), sulfate and chloride, for
which Ground Water Quality Standards are not set out in Table 2 of the Permit, reporting limits
specified in Part l.E.6.e).(l) were used. Those reporting limits are 10 mg/L for TDS, and 1 mg/L
for Sulfate and Chloride. The analytical method reporting limits reported by both laboratories
were checked against the reporting limits specified in the Permit. Reporting limit evaluations are
provided in Tab E. All analytes were measured and reported to the required reporting limits
except the sample results that had the reporting limit raised due to sample dilution necessary to
accommodate the analyte concentrations in the samples. In all cases the reported value for the
analyte was higher than the increased detection limit.
4.5.6 Trip Blank Evaluation
The trip blank results were reviewed to identify any VOC sample contamination which is the
result of sample handling and shipment. Trip blank evaluation is provided in Tab E. The trip
blank results associated with the samples were less than reporting limit for the VOCs except for
the June 16, 2020 trip blank which had a detection of 3.83 ug/L of tetrahydrofuran ("THF"). All
of the samples associated with the trip blanks were nondetect for THF. The reported detections
of THF in the trip blanks, but not in the associated samples indicates that the trip blanks were
contaminated at the laboratory when they were made and the results are not indicative of
contamination of the samples during shipping. As such, the data are usable for the intended
purpose and there is no effect on the sample analytical results.
4.5.7 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
Section 9.1.4 a) of the QAP states that the Relative Percent Difference ("RPD") will be
calculated for the comparison of duplicate and original field samples. The QAP acceptance limits
for RPDs between the duplicate and original field sample is less than or equal to 20% unless the
measured results ( described as activities in the QAP) are less than 5 times the required detection
limit. This standard is based on the United Stated Environmental Protection Agency Contract
Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review, February 1994,
9240.1-05-01 as cited in the QAP. The RPDs are calculated for duplicate pairs for the analytes
regardless of whether or not the reported concentrations are greater than 5 times the required
detection limits; however, data will be considered noncompliant only when the results are greater
than 5 times the required detection limit and the RPD is greater than 20%. RPDs are also only
calculated when both the sample and the duplicate report a detection for any given analyte. If
only one of the pair reports a detection, the RPD cannot be calculated. The additional duplicate
information is provided for information purposes.
6
All duplicate results were within 20% RPD except for TDS in the duplicate pair Cottonwood
Seep/Back Spring. The TDS RPD was greater than 20%, and the sample and duplicate results
reported for Ruin Spring/Back Spring were five times greater than the RLs. The approved QAP
specifies a separate corrective action for duplicate RPDs outside of acceptance limits. The
revised procedure for duplicate results outside of acceptance limits was implemented for the
results outside of the acceptance limits. The corrective actions that were taken in accordance
with the QAP procedure are as follows: the QA Manager contacted the Analytical Laboratory
and requested a review of the raw data to assure that there were no transcription errors and the
data were accurately repo11ed. The laboratory noted that the data were accurate and reported
correctly. Reanalysis was not completed as the samples were out of holding time.
The duplicate evaluation is provided in Tab E.
4.5.8 Radiologies Counting Error
Section 9.14 of the QAP requires that all gross alpha analysis reported with an activity equal to
or greater than the Groundwater Compliance Limits set out in the Permit (for the seeps and
springs samples the Groundwater Quality Standards ["GWQS"] will be used), shall have a
counting variance that is equal to or less than 20% of the reported activity concentration. An
error term may be greater than 20% of the reported activity concentration when the sum of the
activity concentration and error term is less than or equal to the GWQS.
Section 9.4 of the QAP also requires a comparability check between the sample and field
duplicate sample results utilizing the formula provided in the text.
All radiological results were reported were non-detect and therefore within acceptance limits.
Results of routine radiologic sample QC are provided under Tab E.
4.5.9 Laboratory Matrix QC Evaluation
Section 9.2 of the QAP requires that the laboratory's QA/QC Manager check the following items
in developing data reports: (1) sample preparation information is correct and complete, (2)
analysis information is correct and complete, (3) appropriate analytical laboratory procedures are
followed, (4) analytical results are correct and complete, (5) QC samples are within established
control limits, (6) blanks are within QC limits, (7) special sample preparation and analytical
requirements have been met, and (8) documentation is complete. In addition to other laboratory
checks described above, EFRI's QA Manager rechecks QC samples and blanks (items (5) and
(6)) to confirm that the percent recovery for spikes and the relative percent difference for spike
duplicates are within the method-specific required limits, or that the case narrative sufficiently
explains any deviation from these limits. Results of this quantitative check are provided under
Tab E. The lab QA/QC results from both GEL and AW AL met these requirements except as
described below.
A number of the seeps and springs samples had the reporting limit raised due to matrix
interference and/or sample dilution. In all cases where the detection limit was increased, the
concentration for the analyte was higher than the increased detection limit.
7
The check samples included at least the following: a method blank, a laboratory control spike
("LCS"), a matrix spike ("MS") and a matrix spike duplicate ("MSD"), or the equivalent, where
applicable. It should be noted that:
• Laboratory fortified blanks are equivalent to LCSs.
• Laboratory reagent blanks are equivalent to method blanks.
• Post digestion spikes are equivalent to MSs.
• Post digestion spike duplicates are equivalent to MSDs.
• For method E900.l, used to determine gross alpha, a sample duplicate was used instead
of aMSD.
The qualifiers, and the corresponding explanations reported in the QA/QC Summary Reports for
any of the check samples for any of the analytical methods, were reviewed by the QA Manager.
The QAP Section 8.1.2 requires that a MS/MSD pair be analyzed with each analytical batch.
The QAP does not specify acceptance limits for the MS/MSD pair, and the QAP does not specify
that the MS/MSD pair be prepared on EFRI samples only. Acceptance limits for MS/MSDs are
set by the laboratories. The review of the information provided by the laboratories in the data
packages verified that the QAP requirement to analyze a MS/MSD pair with each analytical
batch was met. While the QAP does not require it, the recoveries were reviewed for compliance
with each laboratory's established acceptance limits. The QAP does not require this level of
review and the results of this review are provided for information only.
The information from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports indicates that the MS/MSD
recoveries and the associated RPDs for the seeps and springs samples were within acceptable
laboratory limits except as noted in Tab E. The MS/MSD recoveries that were outside the
laboratory established acceptance limits do not affect the quality or usability of the data, because
the recoveries and RPDs above or below the acceptance limits are indicative of matrix
interference most likely caused by other constituents in the samples. Matrix interferences are
applicable to the individual sample results only. The requirement in the QAPs to analyze a
MS/MSD pair with each analytical batch was met and as such the data are compliant with the
QAP.
The QAP specifies that surrogate compounds shall be employed for all organic analyses, but the
QAP does not specify acceptance limits for surrogate recoveries. The analytical data associated
with the routine quarterly sampling met the requirement specified in the QAP. The information
from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports indicates that the surrogate recoveries for the
seeps and springs samples were within acceptable laboratory limits for all surrogate compounds.
The QAP Section 8.1.2 requires that each analytical batch shall be accompanied by a reagent
blank. Contamination detected in analysis of reagent blanks/method blanks will be used to
evaluate any analytical laboratory contamination of environmental samples. The QAP specified
process for evaluation of reagent/method blanks states that nonconformance will exist when
blanks are within an order of magnitude of the sample results. The information from the
Laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports indicates that the reagent (method) blanks for the seeps
8
and springs samples were non-detect and were therefore within the acceptance criteria specified
in the QAP.
Laboratory duplicates are completed by the analytical laboratories as required by the analytical
method specifications. Acceptance limits for laboratory duplicates are set by the laboratories.
The QAP does not require the completion of laboratory duplicates or the completion of a QA
assessment of them. EFRI reviews the QC data provided by the laboratories for completeness
and to assess the overall quality of the data provided. Laboratory duplicate results are provided
in Tab D.
5.0 EVALUATION OF ANALYTICAL DATA
As previously stated, the samples were analyzed for the groundwater compliance parameters
found on Table 2 of the Permit. In addition to these laboratory parameters, the pH, temperature,
conductivity, (and although not required, redox, dissolved oxygen ["DO"] and turbidity) were
measured and recorded in the field.
5.1 Evaluation of Analytical Results
The results of the March and June sampling events shows no evidence of Mill influence in the
water produced by the seeps and springs sampled. The lack of Mill influence on seeps and
springs is indicated by the fact that the parameters detected are within the ranges of
concentrations for the on-site monitoring wells and for available historic data for the seeps and
springs themselves. For those detected analytes, concentrations are shown in Tables 2A, 2B, 2C,
and 2D. The data are compared to available historic data for each seep and spring as well as to
on-site monitoring well data. Specific discussions about each seep or spring are included below.
5.1.1 Ruin Spring
No VOCs or radiologies were detected. Metals and major ions were the only analytes detected.
The metals detections were minimal with only molybdenum, selenium and uranium having
positive detections. A comparison of the 2009 through 2019 data to the 2020 data shows that the
concentrations of most detected analytes remained approximately the same with only minor
changes within the limits of normal analytical deviation. The reported values for uranium,
calcium, chloride, potassium, sodium, and TDS, increased from the 2019 sample results, but they
are below the upper range of historic background values (where available) for the on-site
monitoring wells. The differences are not significant and are most likely due to normal
fluctuations due to flow rates or seasonal variations due to annual precipitation. Overall, the data
reported for Ruin Spring are typical for a surface water sample with no indication of Mill
influence.
5.1.2 Cottonwood Spring
No VOCs or radiologies were detected. Metals and major ions were the only analytes detected.
The metals detections were minimal with only uranium having a positive detection. A
comparison of the 2009 through 2019 data to the 2020 data shows that the concentrations of most
detected analytes remained approximately the same with only minor changes within the limits of
9
normal analytical deviation. The reported values for uranium, chloride, potassium, and sodium
increased from the 2019 sample results, but they are below the upper range of historic
background values (where available) for the on-site monitoring wells. The differences are not
significant and are most likely due to normal fluctuations due to flow rates or seasonal variations
due to annual precipitation. Overall, the data reported for Cottonwood Spring are typical for a
surface water sample with no indication of Mill influence.
5.1.3 Westwater Seep
No radiologies or VOCs were detected in either the March or June sample. Metals and major
ions were detected in both the March and June samples. In the March sample, the metals
detections were minimal with only iron, manganese, and uranium having positive detections. In
the June sample, the metals detections were minimal with only manganese and uranium having
positive detections. A comparison of the historic data to the 2020 data shows that the
concentrations of most detected analytes remained approximately the same with only minor
changes within the limits of normal analytical deviation. In the March sample, the reported
values for fluoride, ammonia and TDS increased from the 2019 sample results, but they are
below the upper range of historic background values (where available) for the on-site monitoring
wells. In the June sample, the reported values for calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium,
sulfate, TDS and uranium increased from the 2019 sample results, but they are below the upper
range of historic background values (where available) for the on-site monitoring wells. The
differences are not significant and are most likely due to normal fluctuations due to flow rates or
seasonal variations due to annual precipitation. Overall, the data reported for Westwater Seep
are typical for a surface water sample with no indication of Mill influence.
5.1.4 Entrance Spring
No VOCs or radiologies were detected. Metals and major ions were the only analytes detected.
The metals detections were minimal with only uranium, manganese and selenium having
positive detections. A comparison of the 2009 through 2019 data to the 2020 data shows that the
concentrations of most detected analytes remained approximately the same with only minor
changes within the limits of normal analytical deviation. The reported values for selenium,
nitrate, sulfate and TDS increased from the 2019 sample results. The detected concentrations are
below the upper range of historic background values (were available) for the on-site monitoring
wells. The differences are not significant and are most likely due to normal fluctuations due to
flow rates or seasonal variations due to annual precipitation. Overall, the data reported for
Entrance Spring are typical for a surface water sample with no indication of Mill influence.
6.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT
No corrective action reports are required for the 2020 annual sampling event.
6.1 Assessment of Corrective Actions from Previous Period
No corrective action reports were required for the 2019 annual sampling event.
10
7.0 ELECTRONIC DATA FILES AND FORMAT
EFRI has provided to the Director electronic copies of the laboratory results as part of the annual
seeps and springs monitoring in Comma Separated Values, from the laboratory. A copy of the
transmittal e-mail is included under Tab F.
11
8.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION
This document was prepared by Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
By:
Scott A. Bakken
Vice President, Regulatory Affairs
12
Certification
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel
properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or
persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,
and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.
~~~
Scott A. Bakken
Vice President, Regulatory Affairs
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
13
Tables
Table 1: Summary of Seeps and Springs Sampling
·w.0dt OrdeF
Lo~.attcm Sa11qrle Dat.ec @.wLal Sie1! J!D Dllt 0:t''la}b D9:011;
Cottonwood Spring 6/16/2020 AW AL = 2006528 AW AL = 7/06/2020
GEL= 514075 GEL = 7/09/2020
Entrance Seep 6/16/2020 AW AL = 2006528 AW AL = 7/06/2020
GEL= 514075 GEL = 7/09/2020
Back Spring (Duplicate of 6/16/2020 AW AL = 2006528 AW AL = 7/06/2020
Cottonwood Spring) GEL= 514075 GEL = 7/09/2020
Ruin Spring 6/16/2020 AW AL = 2006528 AW AL = 7/06/2020
GEL= 514075 GEL = 7/09/2020
Corral Spring Not Sampled -Dry Not Sampled -Dry Not Sampled -Dry
Corral Canyon Seep Not Sampled-Dry Not Sampled -Dry Not Sampled-Dry
AW AL = 2003627 AWAL = 4/10/2020
Westwater Seep 3/25/20 GEL= 508151 AWAL GEL = 4/14/2020 AW AL
6/16/20 = 2006528 GEL = = 7/06/2020
514075 GEL = 7/09/2020
Table 2A Detected Constituents and Comparison to Historic Values and Mill Site Monitoring Wells
--Ruin Spring
-Range of -
Average
Constituent 2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Historic Avg2003
May July 2020 Values for 20042
Monitoring
I
Wells 1 * --. ----, -,-.. ----
Major Ions (mg/1)
Carbonate <l <l <l l <I <I <l <I <l <l <I <l <l --..
-Bicarbonate 233 254 241 239 237 208 204 200 193 208 202 202 186 ----..
Calcium 151 136 145 148 147 149 150 162 138 145 158 165 169 ---
Chloride 28 23 25 44 28 26.3 27.1 27.4 24.4 27 .4 29.9 23.9 25.8 ND -213 27
Fluoride 0.5 0.53 0.45 0.5 0.52 0.538 <I 0.445 0.541 0.5 0.414 0.505 0.473 ND-1.3 0.6
Magnesium 32.3 29.7 30.6 31.1 31.9 32.1 35.4 31.8 31.1 30.2 33.9 45.6 36.9 ·--
Nitrogen-Ammonia 0.09 <0.05 ND <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 ---~ .. Nitrogen-Nitrate 1.4 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.56 1.54 1.31 1.64 1.55 1.35 1.56 1.39 --
Potassium 3.3 3.07 3.2 3.3 3.5 3.46 3.24 3.14 3.18 3.07 3.58 3.31 4.09 --
Sodium 104 93.4 110 111 115 118 119 126 105 113 128 128 139 --
Sulfate 528 447 486 484 464 553 553 528 490 476 547 474 469 ND-3455 521
TDS 1010 903 942 905 1000 952 984 1000 916 972 IOOO 900 1240 IOl9-5548 I053
Metals (ug/1)
Arsenic <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 --
-Beryllium < 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 < 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --
Cadmium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ND-4.78 0.01
Chromium <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 -~
Cobalt <10 <10 <IO <10 <10 <10 <10 <IO <IO <10 <IO <IO <10 ---
Copper <10 <IO <IO <10 <IO <IO <10 <10 <10 <IO <IO <10 <10 --
Iron <30 <30 <30 <30 <30 <30 <30 <30 <30 <30 <30 <30 <30 ND-7942 25
Lead <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 --
Manganese <IO <IO <IO <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 ND-34,550 5
Mercury <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --
Molybdenum 17 17 16 17 16 16.1 16.0 18.3 17.8 17.2 18 20.2 18.7 --
Nickel <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 ND-61 0.05
Table 2A Detected Constituents and Comparison to Historic Values and Mill Site Monitoring Wells
·---.. ---Ruin Spring
. . . Range of ..
Average
I Constituent 2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Historic Avg2003
May July Values for 20042
Monitoring
-Wells 1 *
Selenium 12.2 10 11.8 10.2 10.8 10.2 12 10 10 10.5 12.2 10.8 10.5 'ND · I D!i'S~ 12.1
. Silver <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <IO <10 <10 <10 <10 <IO <10 ---
Thallium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 -· ..
Tin <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <!00 <100 <100 --
Uranium 9.11 8.47 9.35 8.63 8.68 9.12 9.61 9.03 8.38 8.49 9.35 9.02 9.32 Nt5 ,§9.8 JO.
Vanadium <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 --" -Zinc <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <IO <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 --
Radiologies (pCi/1)
Gross Alpha <0.2 <0.2 <-0.3 <-0.05 <-0.09 <l.0 <l <l.0 <1.0 <LO <l.57 <1.0 <1.0 ND-3~ 0.18
voes (ug/L)
Acetone <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 --
Benzene <l.0 <l.0 <l.0 <l.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 --..
Carbon tetrachloride <l.0 <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 _, -
Chloroform <l.0 <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 <LO <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -· ..
Chloromethane <1.0 <1.0 <LO <l.0 <l.0 <LO <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 .. --
MEK <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 .. ·--
Methylene Chloride <LO <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 ---
Naphthalene <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 <LO <LO <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 <1.0 ----Tetrahydrofuran <1.0 <1.0 <LO <LO <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <LO <1.0 <LO <LO <1.0 <1.0 ---
Toluene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 <LO <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -· -
Xylenes <LO <LO <l.0 <l.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <LO <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <LO <1.0 ---
1 From Figure 3, Table 10 and Appendix B of the Revised Addendum, Back1:mund Growzdwater Quality Report: New Wells.for Denison Mines (USA) Carp's White Mesa Mill Site, San Juan County, Utah , April 30,
2008. prepared by INTERA, Inc. and Table 16 and Appendix D of the Ruvised Background Grou11d11>ater Quality Report: Existing Wells.fc,r Denison Mines ( USA) CJ1p. 's White Mesa Uranium Mill Site, San Juan
County, Utah, October 2007, prepared by INTERA, Inc.
2 From Figure 9 of the Revised Addendum, Evaluation of Available Pre-Operational and Regional Background Data, Background Groundwater Quality Report: Existing Wells for Denison Mines (USA) Corp. 's White
Mesa Mill Site, San Juan Couinty. Utah, November 16, 2007, prepared by INTERA, Inc.
*Range of average historic values for On-Site Monitoring Wells as reported on April 30, 2008 (MW-!, MW-2, MW-3, MW-3A, MW-4, MW-5, MW-11, MW-12, MW-14, MW-15, MW-17, MW-18, MW-19, MW-20,
MW-22, MW-23, MW-24, MW-25, MW-26, MW-27, MW-28, MW-29, MW-30, MW-31 and MW-32)2
-
Table 2B Detected Constituents and Comparison to Historic Values and Mill Site Monitoring Wells
-Cottonwood Spring
.. ! Range of
Average
Constituent 2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Historic Avg 1977
May July Values for 1982 1
I Monitoring
I Wells1* -. -~;;·· ~ --.. -
' --Major Ions (mg/I) -
Carbonate <1 <1 <1 6 <1 <1 <l <1 <1 <l <1 <l <1 --
Bicarbonate 316 340 330 316 326 280 251 271 256 280 283 286 280 :---
Calcium 90.3 92.2 95.4 94.2 101 87.9 99.7 111 102 99.6 109 122 120 ---
Chloride 124 112 113 134 149 118 128 133 138 129 153 138 146 ND-213 31
Fluoride 0.4 0.38 0.34 0.38 0.38 0.417 <l 0.318 0.466 0.344 0.282 0.249 0.233 ND-1.3 0.8
Magnesium 25 24.8 25.2 25 .2 27.7 23.6 29.0 27.5 29.5 27.1 30.2 35.3 32.9 ----
Nitrogen-<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.0512 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Ammonia ---
Nitrogen-Nitrate 0.1 <0.l 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.l <0.1 <0.1 0.124 0.108 <0.1 <0.1 ---
Potassium 5.7 5.77 6 5.9 6.2 5.53 6.18 5.91 6.11 5.72 6.35 6.78 7.14 --
Sodium 205 214 229 227 247 217 227 251 221 213 234 268 273 --
Sulfate 383 389 394 389 256 403 417 442 443 409 428 423 417 ND-3455 ' 230
TDS 1010 900 1030 978 1040 996 968 1020 1070 1080 1080 1010 860 1019-5548 811
Metals (ug/1)
Arsenic <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 ---
Beryllium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --
Cadmium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ND -4.78 -
Chromium <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 -= --Cobalt <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 -----Copper <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 --
Iron <30 <30 53 <30 <30 <30 <30 <30 <30 <30 <30 <30 <30 ND-7942 150
Lead <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 --
Manganese <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 ND-34,550 580
Mercury <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --
Molybdenum <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 ---
Nickel <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 ND-61 -
Selenium <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 ND-106.5 -
Table 2B Detected Constituents and Comparison to Historic Values and Mill Site Monitoring Wells
Cottonwood Spring ---
I Range of
: Average
Constituent 2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Historic Avg 1971
May July Values for 1982 1
Monitoring
' Wells1*
-Silver <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 ~ -
Thallium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <5 <5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --
Tin <100 <100 <100 <]00 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 --
Uranium 8.42 8.24 7.87 8.68 8.17 8.95 9.62 9.12 8.84 9.17 10.3 10.1 10.5 ND-59.8 -
Vanadium <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 --
Zinc <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 , I ---
Radiologies (pCi/1)
Gross Alpha <0.2 <0.2 <0.1 <-0.1 <-0.2 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 ND-36 7.2
voes (ug/L)
Acetone <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 "
Benzene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -
Carbon <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -
tetrachloride -,.
Chloroform <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 "'---
Chloromethane <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 ---
MEK <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 --I -..
Methylene ;
Chloride <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 --
Naphthalene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 ----
Tetrahydrofuran <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 ----..
Toluene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 --· I --
~~ . . Xylenes <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 ---
1 From Figure 3, Table 10 and Appendix B of the Revised Addendum, Background Groundwater Quality Report: New Wellsji1r Denison Mines (USA) Corp 's White Mesa Mill Site, San Juan County. Utah ,
April 30, 2008, prepared by INTERA, Inc. and Table 16 and Appendix D of the Revised Background Groundwater Quality Report: Existing Wells for Denison Mines (USA) Corp. 's White Mesa Uranium Mill
Site, San Juan County, Utah, October 2007, prepared by INTERA, Inc.
*Range of average historic values for On-Site Monitoring Wells as reported on April 30, 2008 (MW-l, MW-2, MW-3, MW-3A, MW-4, MW-5, MW-1 l, MW-12, MW-14, MW-15, MW-17, MW-18, MW-19,
MW-20, MW-22, MW-23, MW-24, MW-25, MW-26, MW-27, MW-28, MW-29, MW-30, MW-31 and MW-32)
-
I
Table 2C Detected Constituents and Comparison to Historic Values and Mill Site Monitorin_e Wells
Westwater.Seep -----. ' --· -Range of
Average
Constituent 2009 2010 2011 May 2011 July 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2020 Historic
• (March) (June) Values for
I Monitoring I
-J ---Wells1 *
·--~ Major Ions (m!!/1)
Carbonate <l <1 <1 <l <I <I <I <l <l <l --
Bicarbonate 465 450 371 359 399 369 444 450 270 450 ---
Calcium 191 179 247 150 176 125 204 185 118 204 --
Chloride 41 40 21 32.6 38.0 27.5 36.2 41.6 26.6 40.6 ND-213
Fluoride 0.7 0.6 0.54 0.424 0.618 0.574 0.659 0.505 0.555 0.429 ND-1.3
Magnesium 45.9 44.7 34.7 Not Sampled Not Sampled Not Sampled Not Sampled 34 47.3 31.7 56.6 43.7 30.8 54.6 -
Nitrogen-Ammonia <0.05 0.5 0.06 Dry Dry Dry Dry 0.123 <0.05 <0.05 0.0832 <0.05 0.0593 <0.05 -
Nitrogen-Nitrate 0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 ..
Potassium 1.19 6.57 3.9 1.98 2.32 2.33 2.94 3.99 1.76 5.28 --
Sodium 196 160 112 139 185 133 218 152 117 245 ..
Sulfate 646 607 354 392 573 318 580 436 307 460 ND-3455
TDS 1370 1270 853 896 1060 820 1220 1110 1200 1480 1019 · 5548
Metals(u~)
Arsenic <5 <5 12.3 <5.0 <5 .0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 ..
Beryllium <0.5 <0.5 0.91 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 -
Cadmium <0.5 <0.5 0.9 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ND-4.78
Chromium <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 -.. -
Cobalt <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 -
Copper <10 <10 16 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 -
Iron 89 56 4540 • <30 40.1 181 575 1200 401 <30 ND-7942
Lead <1.0 <l.0 41.4 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -
Manganese 37 87 268 171 55.5 144 312 528 369 35.4 ND-34,550
Mercury <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Not Sampled Not Sampled Not Sampled Not Sampled <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Dry Dry Dry Dry ---Molybdenum 29 29 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 -
Nickel <20 <20 29 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 ND-61
Selenium <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 ND· 106.5
Silver <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <IO <10 -
Thallium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 -
Tin <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 -
Uranium 15.l 46.6 6.64 2.1 19.0 5.17 13.2 4.92 2.34 12.90 ND -59.8
Vanadium <15 <15 34 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 --
Zinc <10 <10 28 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 .-
Table 2C Detected Constituents and Comparison to Historic Values and Mill Site Monitorin_g Wells
-----Westwater Seep -.. -·-Range of
Average
Constituent 2009 2010 2011 May 2011 July 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2020 2020 Historic 2019 (March) (June) Values for
! Monitoring
:.. : -· Wells1 *
RadiollH!ics (pCi/1) ----
Gross Alpha < -0.l <0.3 0.5 Not Sampled Not Sampled Not Sampled Not Sampled <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 ND-36 Dry Dry Dry Dry
VQ~(ugll,)
Acetone <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 23.1 <20 <20 <20 <20 -
Benzene <1.0 <LO <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -
Carbon tetrachloride <l.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 ---. Chloroform <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 --
Chloromethane <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 --
MEK <20 <20 <20 Nor Sampled Not Sampled Not Sampled Not Sampled <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 Dry Dry Dry Dry --
Methylene Chloride <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 <1.0 --
Naphthalene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 <1.0 --
Terrahydrofuran <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 <l.0 <l.0 <1.0 --
Toluene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 --
Xylenes <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 --
From Figure 3, Table 10 and Appendix B of the Revised Addendum. Background Groundwater Quality Report: New Well.tfor Denison Mines (USA ) Corp's White Mesa Mill Site, San Juan County, Utah , April
30, 2008, prepared by INTERA, Inc. and Table 16 and Appendix D of the Revised Background Groundwater Quality Report: Existing Wells for Denison Mines (USA) Corp. 's White Mesa Uranium Mill Site, San
Juan County, Utah, October 2007, prepared by INTERA, Inc.
*Range of average historic values for On-Site Monitoring Wells as reported on April 30, 2008 (MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, MW-3A, MW-4, MW-5, MW-11, MW-12, MW-14, MW-15, MW-I 7, MW-18, MW-19,
MW-20, MW-22, MW-23, MW-24, MW-25, MW-26, MW-27, MW-28, MW-29, MW-30, MW-31 and MW-32)
Table 20 Detected Constituents and Comparison to Historic Values and Mill Site Monitoria~ Wells --. Entrance Sp~ . ---
Range of Average
Constituent 2009 2010 2011 May 2011 July 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Historic Values
I for Monitoring
Wells1 *
---. --· -l -~ -
Major Ions (mg/I) --
Carbonate <l <l <l 7 <1 <I <1 <l <I <I <I <1 <I --
Bicarbonate 292 332 270 299 298 292 247 324 340 402 236 480 242 -
Calcium 90.8 96.5 88.8 96.6 105 121 103 131 131 129 116 155 144 -
Chloride 60 63 49 64 78 139 76.8 75.6 75 84.6 75.9 104 76.7 ND-213
Fluoride 0.7 0.73 0.58 0.58 0.64 0.71 <1 0.606 0.668 0.615 0.454 0.912 0.638 ND-1.3
Magnesium 26.6 28.9 26.4 28.4 32.7 43 34.9 33.3 38.6 36.4 42.4 48.0 45.1 -
Nitrogen-Ammonia 0.28 <0.05 <0.05 0.32 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.202 0.0962 0.247 0.102 0.168 <0.05 .. .
Nitrogen-Nitrate 1.4 1 1.4 0.5 2.8 2.06 3.65 <0.1 0.403 <I 2.34 <l 2.46 --
Potassium 2.4 2.74 2.6 2.9 2 3.83 1.56 l.62 <1.0 3.88 3.64 4.66 4.31 ..
Sodium 61.4 62.7 62.5 68.6 77.4 127 78.9 93.1 90.8 90.3 96 126 108 --
Sulfate 178 179 166 171 171 394 219 210 245 187 243 160 317 ND-3455
TDS 605 661 571 582 660 828 688 680 828 752 820 892 964 1019 -5548
Me,~(ug/1)
Arsenic <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 5.02 <5 9.16 <5 8.94 <5 --
Beryllium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --
Cadmium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ND-4.78
Chromium <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 --
Cobalt <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 -
Conner <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 -
Iron <30 <30 37 55 34 162 37.2 295 94.4 371 <30 453 <30 ND-7942
Lead <1.0 <l.0 <l.0 <l.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 <l.0 <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 <l.0 -
Manganese 54 11 47 84 <10 259 16.1 367 210 913 405 587 56.3 ND-34,550
Mercury <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 -
Molybdenum <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 14.30 <10 I -
Nickel <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 ND-61
Selenium 12.1 9.2 13.1 5.5 13.2 11.2 15.9 <5 <5 <5 15.3 <5 15 ND-106.5
Silver <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 -
Thallium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --::
Tin <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 -
Uranium 15.2 17.8 18.8 15.3 21.1 38.8 23.2 36 22.0 14.6 27.6 70.1 24.7 ND-59.8
Vanadium <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 --
Zinc <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 -
Table 20 Detected Constituents and Comparison to Historic Values and Mill Site Monitorine;_ Wells -Entrance Spring --..
Range of Average
Constituent 2009 2010 2011 May 2011 July 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Historic Values
for Monitoring
Wells1*
·--
Radiologjcs (pCiil) -
Gross Aloha 0.9 <0.5 1.5 1.6 0.5 I 2.3 <I I 3.05 <I 2.53 <l 2.63 <1 ND-36
VOCS(ue/L)
Acetone <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 -
Benzene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 --
Carbon tetrachloride <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 --
Chloroform <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 --
Chloromethane <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -
MEK <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 -
Methylene Chloride <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -
Naphthalene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -
Tetrahydrofuran <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -
Toluene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.32 <1.0 <1.0 13.1 <1.0 5.59 <1.0 --
Xylenes <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 --
1 From Figure 3, Table 10 and Appendix B of the Revised Addendum, Background Groundwater Quality Report: New Wells for Denison Mines (USA) Carp's White Mesa Mill Site, San Juan County,
Utah, April 30, 2008, prepared by INTERA, Inc. and Table 16 and Appendix D of the Revised Background Groundwater Quality Report: Existing Wells for Denison Mines (USA) Corp. 's White Mesa
Uranium Mill Site, San Juan County, Utah, October 2007, prepared by INTERA, Inc.
*Range of average historic values for On-Site Monitoring Wells as reported on April 30, 2008 (MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, MW-3A, MW-4, MW-5, MW-11 , MW-12, MW-14, MW-15, MW-17, MW-18,
MW-19, MW-20, MW-22, MW-23, MW-24, MW-25, MW-26, MW-27, MW-28, MW-29, MW-30, MW-31 and MW-32)
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Seeps and Springs Field Data Sheets and Photographic Documentation
Tab B Field Parameter Measurement Data
Tab C Survey Data and Contour Map
Tab D Analytical Laboratory Data
Tab E Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
E-1 Holding Time Evaluation
E-2 Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check
E-3 Analytical Method Check
E-4 Reporting Limit Evaluation
E-5 Trip Blank Evaluation
E-6 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
E-7 Radiologic Counting Error
E-8 Laboratory Matrix QC Evaluation
Tab F CSV Transmittal
Tab A
Seeps and Springs Field Data Sheets and Photographic Documentation
~ ...... d Data Record-Seeps and Springs S~1.a.1pling
Seep or Spring Location: {.. o±±al\ tN ...... OoLL.W.ti..___S....,..p .... c-'-'i Cl ...... j.>C\-------------
09'-15 Date For Initial Sampling Visit: C:./ )b/ :)...o;2.t) Time: ----------
Sample Collected: ~ Yes o No
Date For Second Sampling Visit: Time: ----------------
Sample Collected: o Yes D No
Date For Third Sampling Visit: ____ _ Time: ----------
Sample Collected: o Yes D No
Date For Fourth Sampling Visit: ________ Time: _________ _
Sample Collected: o Yes D No (?wM R.C)
Deen L'j~M, Dc"l.11 ~~11Jer..son , Pl-.:1 6-o.b/-(. Sampling Personnel: ....r;_
Weather Conditions at Time of Sampling: _________ _
Estimated Seep or Spring Flow Rate: ,)~ (rP M O . 2:-5
Field Parameter Measurements:
-pH 7.0
-Temperature (°C) _.l,__b~· :S.....__b _________ _
-Conductivity µMHOC/cm -"-'l b._7,_~...__ _______ _
-Turbidity (NTU) (if measured)_l,_. -'--l --------·
-Redox Potential Eh (mV) (if measured) _)=7 ...... 7..___ ____ _
Do 5D
Analytical Parameters/Sample Collection Method:
Parameter Sample Taken Filtered Sam0Un2 Method
-
voes ~Yes D No oYes ~No
Metals lll Yes oNo ~Yes DNo
Nutrients 4l Yes oNo oYes ~ No
Other Non eµ Yes DNo o Yes Ill No
Radiologies
Gross Alpha ~ Yes oNo fi.l Yes DNo
QC Samples Associated with this Location:
o Rinsate Blank
D Duplicate
Duplicate Sample Name:
Direct Peristaltic Ladle
Pump
0 ~ D
D ~ D
D III D
D [$ 0
D 1¥] D
s.~tc ~+ 0'/.3j ~(llM pl~s co/lec.+e; ,,.+ D'-1 '-J.5
Other
( describe in
notes section)
D
D
D
D
D
FL .... Data Record-Seeps and Springs SaL.Ain g
Seep or Spring Location: __ 8 __ =..,,~"k~-~~P-"~':j~--------------
Date For Initial Sampling Visit: Co/ I c; I )..D ;l.C)
Sample Collected: ~ Yes o No
Time: 0 q !.f.-5
Date For Second Sampling Visit: ________ Time: _________ _
Samp1e Collected: D Yes D No
Date For Third Sampling Visit: __ _ Time: ------------
Sample Collected: D Yes D No
Date For Fourth Sampling Visit: ________ Time: __________ _
Sample Collected: D Yes o No
Sampling Personnel: ~en,,.. YolFJ~,
LDlc)M RL-)
Dee,11 L:_f1 A" 1 Dc0" J.Jc11deoo 1\1 Pl-I ; I &ob le..
Weather Conditions at Time of Sampling: _______________ _
Estimated Seep or Spring Flow Rate: _ _.,~""'·WJ,_=-· _ __.(_,_·2 ...... ~'.l..._5-L,__G--_P_M _____ _
Field Parameter Measurements:
-pH
-Temperature (°C) ______________ _
-Conductivity µMHOC/cm ------------
-Turbidity (NTU) (if measured) __________ _
-Redox Potential Eh (mV) (if measured) _______ _
Analytical Parameters/Sample Collection Method:
Parameter Sample Taken Filtered SampUng Method
voes ~ Yes DNo oYes ·~No
Metals IE Yes DNo ~Yes DNo
Nutrients Ii;') Yes DNo o Yes ~ No
Other Non ~ Yes DNo IJ Yes !pl No
Radiologies
Gross Alpha ~ Yes oNo ~Yes DNo
QC Samples Associated with this Location:
o Rinsate Blank
~ Duplicate
Duplicate Sample Name: __
Direct Peristaltic Ladle Other
Pump (describe in
notes section)
D Iii D D
D rn D D
D Iii D D
D Ill D D
D ~ 0 D
I . I F ._ .. d Data Record~Seeps and Springs Sa~wling
Seep or Spring Location: -=~CLf\::..i.}_,_c"""'a ..... o.,_,c..,.,.e __ .S _____ , ... ~ ... P ____________ _
Date For Initial Sampling Visit: (;./lC:,/:).DJ...0
Sample Collected: 1211 Yes D No
Time: _ ___._.! l'---'0=--5'--------
Date For Second Sampling Visit: ____________ Time: _________ _
Sample Collected: o Yes o No
Date For Third Sampling Visit: ________ Time: _________ _
Sample Collected: o Yes o No
Date For Fourth Sampling Visit: ________ Time: _________ _
Sample Collected: o Yes o No
Sampling Personnel: ~aocr-Hel/,'t4j ,
(Dwfll~C.J
De.en L::Jrv'IM , 0<!''"-1'1 He1dec4 Ph,'l &obi.::
Weather Conditions at Time of Sampling: _______________ _
Estimated Seep or Spring Flow Rate: ~ &PM Q 05
Field Parameter Measurements:
-pH 7-,
-Temperature (°C) -·"-'H,.a...a.,.-5._.'f __________ _
-Conductivity µMHOC/cm _...._t :U..=....:;..,~D _________ _
-Turbidity (NTU) (if measured)~'i~· "'---------
-Redox Potential Eh (m V) (if measured) _3-'~""""'1 _____ _
, D~ 77.,,,C
Analytical Parameters/Sample Collection Method:
Parameter Sample Taken Filtered Samplioe. Method
Direct Peristaltic Ladle Other
Pwnp ( describe in
notes section)
voes 111 Yes oNo o Yes r;; No D ljl D D
Metals Iii) Yes oNo gi Yes oNo D l'j] D D
Nutrients Iii Yes oNo oYes ~No D 1¥) D D
Other Non ~Yes oNo oYes ell No D l¥'l D D
Radiolocics
Gross Alpha 00 Yes oNo ~Yes oNo D ~ D D
QC Samples Associated with this Location:
o Rinsate Blank
o Duplicate
Duplicate Sample Name: ___________ _
, t
Fa..ad Data Record-Seeps and Springs Sa1upling
Seep or Spring Location: _R~!A~;~O~_s-iPt-'-i-'=5--,---------------
Date For Initial Sampling Visit: b/ If,/ ~0;20
Sample Collected: i;zi Yes o No
Time: !6~
Time: Date For Second Sampling Visit:_ ·----------------
Sample Collected: o Yes o No
Date For Third Sampling Visit: ________ Time: _________ _
Sample Collected: o Yes o No
Time: Date For Fourth Sampling Visit: __ _ ----------------
Sample Collected: D Yes o No (._D w M ft.<...)
Sampling Personnel: -"knnc.r ~,, II: Jt>.j l Dt:e11 Lj""l IA.I'\ 1 De"-"' ~et1Jcrso '1 , Pli,1 &ob le
Weather Conditions at Time of Sampling: __
Estimated Seep or Spring Flow Rate: ~ & PM O . 7 0
Field Parameter Measurements:
-pH Cj
-Temperature (°C) __.l_.5 ............ 4_1 ___________ _
-Conductivity µMHOC/cm 132 I -~~----------Turbidity (NTU) (if measured) ()=------------
-Redox Potential Eh (mV) (if measured) -3~17~-----
Do I.fl
Analytical Parameters/Sample Collection Method:
Parameter Sample Taken Filtered Samp~2 Method
voes SJ Yes DNo o Yes ·~No
Metals !Jl Yes oNo W Yes oNo
Nutrients Bl Yes oNo o Yes Iii No
Other Non ~ Yes DNo oYes i¥J No
Radiologies
Gross Alpha ~Yes oNo ~ Yes DNo
QC Samples Associated with this Location:
D Rinsate Blank
o Duplicate
Duplicate Sample Name: ---
Notes: Au-:'l)d Qf'I ~;te. o.: I o
LeH ::i d-c. rJ I
Direct Peristaltic Ladle Other
Pump (describe in
notes section)
&] D D D
D Iii D D
Iii D D D
fl) D D 0
D 1¥) D D
FieL ~ata Record-Seeps and Sp·rings San. ...ng
Seep or Spring Location: j) e ~t I »·l o..te c
Date For Initial Sampling ')sit: 3/ [).:5 / :J..D;LO
Sample Collected: dYes o No
SP '' ~e£P----
Time: ~ 1 ·~ob
Date For Second Sampling Visit: ________ Time: _________ _
Sample Collected: o Yes D No
Date For Third Sampling Visit: ________ Time: _________ _
Sample Collected: D Yes D No
Date For Fourth Sampling Visit: ________ Time: _________ _
Sample Collected: _o Yes D No
Sampling Personnel: --r;; ooe,..-Won I ck I &o..q<(\ Po-.l mer
Weather Conditions at Time of Sampling: !;>....,anj w .th ~me lt;,..,J
Estimated Seep or Spring Flow Rate: ---=D;.._,:....,l~O.__-__.,[,.L-r: ..... P---'--M__.__ ________ _
Field Parameter Measurements:
-pH
-Temperature (°C) _..ul )_,_, __..qo,,.,_ ___________ _
-Conductivity µMHOC/cm ...11.1h'-----------
-Turbidity (NTU) (if measured)___.O...___
-Redox Potential Eh (mV) (if measured) --...r.:~D;;t=""------
DD bl.'2.
Analytical Parameters/Sample Collection Method:
Parameter Sample Taken Filtered Samplin2 Method
Direct Peristaltic Ladle Other
Pump ( describe in
notes section)
voes ~Yes DNo D Yes fjl No D 00 D D
Metals ~ Yes DNo Ei Yes oNo D 00 D D
Nutrients ~Yes oNo oYes !Sil No D ~ D D
Other Non fll Yes oNo oYes ~No D I'll D D
Radiolocics
Gross Alpha ~ Yes DNo 1;1;1 Yes oNo D ~ D D
QC Samples Associated with this Location:
o Rinsate Blank
o Duplicate
Duplicate Sample Name: _______________ _
noo
,h.~d Data Record-Seeps and Springs S~.tupling
Seep or Spring Location: w~~+wQ\.+er See,p / 5 p(':"'j
Date For Initial Sampling Visit: 6 //(,,/,)..D2 D Time:_0~8~L..~;l.5=-------
Sample Collected: IJ Yes o No
Date For Second Sampling Visit: __ ,----______ Time: _________ _
Sample Collected: o Yes o No
Date For Third Sampling Visit: ________ Time: _________ _
Sample Collected: o Yes o No
Date For Fourth Sampling Visit: ________ Time: _________ _
Sample Collected: o Yes D No
Sampling Personnel: "iMf\cr Wo//;J:j ,
Weather Conditions at Time of Sampling:
Estimated Seep or Spring Flow Rate: __,(H@""""·=· '--'. :___~..>...L.--'--="""-''----..... 0.e....,..,, Q,5-==-.,__ ____ _
Field Parameter Measurements:
-pH (, .'iO
-Temperature (°C) __._l_,._<._,_.1_;).. ____________ _
-Conductivity µMHOC/cm _I b_'1~'i _________ _
-Turbidity (NTU) (ifmeasured)_7-'-.~'---------
-Redox Potential Eh (mV) (if measured) _,,,3'-"K=5 _____ _
DO i'. b't.~
Analytical Parameters/Sample Collection Method:
Parameter Sample Taken Filtered SampUni Method
voes Ii! Yes oNo D Yes -~No
Metals ra Yes oNo rn Yes DNo
Nutrients oo Yes oNo oYes rE No
Other Non l!ll Yes oNo oYes ~No
Radiologies
Gross Alpha ~Yes oNo ~Yes o No
QC Samples Associated with this Location:
D Rinsate Blank
o Duplicate
Direct Peristaltic
Pump
D Iii
D ~
D CB
D [fl
D [jJ
Duplicate Sample Name: ___________ _
Ladle Other
(describe in
notes section)
D D
D D
D D
D D
D D
., ~
' ..
FiJ~ Jlata Record~Seeps and Springs Sarl. ...mg
Date For Initial Sampling Visit: ;-l4 -ol--0
Sample Collected: o Yes ~o
Date For Second Sampling Visit:____ S -l:'.;)-'J-0
Sample Collected: D Yes aJ No
Date For Third Sampling Visit: 7 / 17 /;J.fJ ?..a
Sample Collected: o Yes cy1. No
Date For Fourth Sampling Visit: \0 /93/0-DJ...{)
j
Sample Collected: o Yes o No
Sampling Personnel:
Time:
Time:
Time:
Time:
Weather Conditions at Time of Sampling: ______ _
130~-
I~ L\1
11~'1
03~1
Estimated Seep or Spring Flow Rate: ------------------
Field Parameter Measurements:
-pH
-Temperature (°C) ______________ _
-Conductivity µMHOC/cm ___________ _
-Turbidity (NTU) (if measured) _________ _
-Redox Potential Eh (m V) (if measured) ______ _
Analytical Parameters/Sample Collection Method:
Parameter Sample Taken Filtered Samplin2 Method
voes oYes D No o Yes DNo
Metals o Yes o No o Yes oNo
Nutrients oYes o No o Yes oNo
Other Non oYes oNo o Yes DNo
Radiologies
Gross Alpha D Yes oNo o Yes oNo
QC Samples Associated with this Location:
D Rinsate Blank
o Duplicate
Direct Peristaltic
Pump
D 0
D 0
0 0
D D
D D
Duplicate Sample Name: ___________ _
Notes:
Ladle Other
( describe in
notes section)
D D
D D
D D
D D
0 D
-------------------------------
Fil.. Data Record-Seeps and Springs Sari.r..ing
Date For Initial Sampling Visit: a.-1 'i-u, Time: _ _. __________ _
Sample Collected: D Yes ~o
Date For Second Sampling Visit: :;, I 13 /.2..0 .. J1:!,/:J.JJ Time: __ I ~'2>~1 ............. 9, _____ _
Sample Collected: D Yes ~ No
Date For Third Sampling Visit: 7 / J7 / ;1...0;1....0
Sample Collected: D Yes ~ No
Date For Fourth Sampling Visit: IQ /;).3/p..o2.0
Sample Collected: D Yes atNo
Sampling Personnel:
Time: 0916
Time: 683/
Weather Conditions at Time of Sampling: ____ _
Estimated Seep or Spring Flow Rate: ------------------
Field Parameter Measurements:
-pH
-Temperature (°C) ---------------
-Conductivity µMHOC/cm ___________ _
-Turbidity (NTU) (if measured) _________ _
-Redox Potential Eh (mV) (if measured) ______ _
Analytical Parameters/Sample Collection Method:
Parameter Sample Taken Filtered Samplin,t Method
voes D Yes DNo oYes DNo
Metals D Yes DNo oYes DNo
Nutrients D Yes DNo oYes oNo
Other Non D Yes DNo o Yes DNo
Radiologies
Gross Alpha D Yes DNo DYes oNo
QC Samples Associated with this Location:
D Rinsate Blank
o Duplicate
Direct Peristaltic
Pump
D D
D D
D D
D D
D D
Duplicate Sample Name: -----------
Notes:
Ladle Other
( describe in
notes section)
D D
D D
D D
D D
D D
-------------------------------
TabB
Field Parameter Measurement Data
Field parameters
Ij3~
Location SampJea pH Conductivity Turbidity, Redox Temperature DO
Cottonwood Spring 6/16/2020 7.09 1679 1.1 277 16.36 50
Entrance Seep 6/16/2020 7.73 1220 4.6 334 16.59 77
Back Spring
(Duplicate of
Cottonwood Spring) 6/16/2020 7.09 1679 1.1 277 16.36 50
Ruin Spring 6/16/2020 7.19 1321 0 317 15.91 41
Westwater Seep 3/25/2020 7.32 1176 0.0 302 11.90 61.2
Westwater Seep 6/16/2020 6.40 1644 7.7 385 16.72 64.2
TabC
Survey Data and Contour Map
Seeps and Springs Survey Locations
Mid-December 2009 Survey
Location Latitude (N) Longitude (W) Elevation
FROG POND 37°33'03.5358" 109°29'04.9552 II 5589.56
CORRAL CANYON 37°33'07.1392" 109°29'12.3907" 5623.97
ENTRANCE SPRING 37°32'01.6487" 109°29'33.7005" 5559.71
CORRAL SPRINGS 37°29'37.9192" 109°29'35.8201" 5383 .35
RUIN SPRING 37°30'06.0448" 109°31'23.4300" 5380.03
COTTONWOOD 37°3 l '21.7002" 109°32'14.7923" 5234.33
WESTWATER 37°31 '58.5020" 109°31 '25.7345" 5468.23
Verification Survey July 2010
RUIN SPRING 37°30'06.0456" 109°31 '23.4181" 5380.01
COTTONWOOD 37°3 l '21.6987" 109°32'14.7927" 5234.27
WESTWATER 37°31'58.5013" 109°31'25.7357" 5468.32
@ estimated dry area
TW442 temporary perched monitoring well
¢5526 installed April, 2019 showing
elevation in feet amsl
MW-38 perched monitoring well
-Q-5463 installed February, 2018 showing
elevation in feet amsl
TW4-40 temporary perched monitoring well
+5526 installed February, 2018 showing
elevation in feet amsl
M;'5~03 perched monitoring well showing
elevation in feet amsl
TW4-12 . .
0 5569 temporary perched monitoring well
showing elevation in feet amsl
TWN-7 h d ·t ·t . <>5568 temporary perc e m rate mom onng
well showing elevation in feet amsl
PIEZ-1 perched piezometer showing
'-' 5588 elevation in feet amsl
RUIN SPRING & 5380 seep or spring showing
elevation in feet amsl
NOTES: MW-4, MW-26, TW4-1., TW4-2, TW4-4, TW4-11, TW4-19, TW4-21, TW4-37, TW4-39, TW4-40 and TW4-41 are chloroform pumping wells;
TW4-22! TW4-24, TW4-25 and TWN-2 are nitrate pumping wells; TW4-11 water level is below the base of the Burro Canyon Formation
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM, INC.
KRIGED 3rd QUARTER, 2020 WATER LEVELS
(DR PIEZOMETERS NOT INCLUDED)
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE REFERENCE H :/718000/nov20/
seeps_springs/Uwl0920nodr.srf
FIGURE
C-1
@ estimated dry area
TW4-42 temporary perched monitoring well
¢ 5526 installed April, 2019 showing
elevation in feet amsl
MW-38 perched monitoring well
-<?"5463 installed February, 2018 showing
elevation in feet amsl
TW4-40 temporary perched monitoring well
-+-5526 installed February, 2018 showing
elevation in feet amsl
M:'s5so3 perched monitoring well showing
elevation in feet amsl
TW4-12 0 5569 temporary perched monitoring well
showing elevation in feet amsl
TWN-7 h d . . . .A.5568 temporary perc e nitrate monitoring
V well showing elevation in feet amsl
PIEZ-1 perched piezometer showing
-1 5588 elevation in feet amsl
RUIN SPRING & 5380 seep or spring showing
elevation in feet amsl
NOTES: MW-4, MW-26, TW4-1, TW4-2, TW4-4, TW4-11, TW4-19, TW4-21, TW4-37, TW4-39, TW4-40 and TW4-41 are chloroform pumping wells;
TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25 and TWN-2 are nitrate pumpl119 wells; TW4-11 water level is below the base of the Burro Canyon Formation
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
KRIGED 3rd QUARTER, 2020 WATER LEVELS
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE REFERENCE H:/718000/nov20/
seeps_springs/Uwl0920dr.srf
FIGURE
C-2
TabD
Analytical Laboratory Data
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Lab Sample ID: 2006528-002
Client Sample ID: Ruin Spring
ANAi VTICAl l ARORATORIFS Collection Date: 6/16/2020 1035h
Received Date: 6/18/2020 1100h
Analytical Results DISSOLVED METALS
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
3440 South 700 West Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
;alt Lake City, UT 84119 Arsenic mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1327h E200.8 0.00500 < 0.00500
Beryllium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1351 h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Cadmium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1327h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Phone:[phone] Calcium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1905h E200.7 10.0 169
Chromium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1327h E200.8 0.0250 < 0.0250
Toll Free: [phone] Cobalt mg/L 6/19/2020 13 13h 7/1/2020 1327h E200.8 0.0100 <0.0100
Fax: [phone] Copper mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1327h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
!-mail: [e-mail] Iron mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1351 h E200.8 0.0300 < 0.0300
Lead mg/L 6/19/2020 13l3h 7/1/2020 1351h E200.8 0.00100 < 0.00100
web: www.awal-labs.com Magnesium mg/L 6/19/2020 13 13h 7/1/2020 1905h E200.7 10.0 36.9
Manganese mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1327h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Mercury mg/L 6/24/2020 1313h 6/25/2020 912h E245.I 0.000500 < 0.000500
Kyle F. Gross Molybdenum mg/L 6/19/2020 13 13h 7/1/2020 1327h E200.8 0.0100 0.0187
Laboratory Director Nickel mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1327h E200.8 0.0200 < 0.0200
Potassium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/3/2020 1206h E200.7 1.00 4.09
Jose Rocha Selenium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1327h E200.8 0.00500 0.0105
QA Officer Silver mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1327h E200.8 0.0100 <0.0100
Sodium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1905h E200.7 10.0 139
Thallium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 135th E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Tin mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1327h E200.8 0.100 <0.100
Uranium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1427h E200.8 0.000300 0.00932
Vanadium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/3/2020 1206h E200.7 0.0150 < 0.0150
Zinc mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1327h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page 7 of 38
All anal) ses applicable lo lhe CWA, SOWA. and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the allached COC Confidential Business lnforrm:ition: This report is provided for lhe exclusi, e use of the
~ddressee Pri, ile~es o~ su~eq~enl ~~e of the ~?'?1e of this _con_ipany or .tn) ~mber of ils slafT. or reproducli~ ~f lhis repo~ in ~on~eclion~ wilh Lhe ~vertise~enl, P~?motio.n ~r sale of~) ~rod~cl or p~ocess, ~r in ~onn~c~ion w~Lh th~ r~-publicalion of !his report
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Lab Sample ID: 2006528-002
Client Sample ID: Ruin Spring
Collection Date: 6/16/2020 1035h
Received Date: 6/18/2020 1100h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
3440 South 700 West Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
;alt Lake City, UT 84119 Ammonia (as N) mg/L 6/25/2020 1035h 6/25/2020 2054h E350,l 0.0500 < 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mg/L 6/19/2020 808h SM2320B 1.00 186
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 6/19/2020 808h SM2320B 1.00 < 1.00
Phone: [phone] Chloride mg/L 6/25/2020 1926h E300.0 4.00 25.8
Toll Free: [phone] Fluoride mg/L 6/25/2020 2156h E300.0 0.100 0.473
Fax:[phone] Ion Balance % 7/2/2020 858h Cale. -100 10.6
!-mail: [e-mail] Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L 6/25/2020 1243h E353.2 0.100 1.39
Sulfate mg/L 6/25/2020 1926h E300.0 30.0 469
web: www.awal-labs.com Total Anions, Measured meq/L 7/2/2020 858h Cale. 14.2
Total Cations, meq/L 7/2/2020 858h Cale. 17.6
Measured
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 6/19/2020 1209h SM2540C 20.0 1,240 Kyle F. Gross Total Dissolved Solids Cale. 1.30 7/2/2020 858h
Laboratory Director Ratio,
Measured/Calculated
Jose Rocha Total Dissolved Solids, mg/L 7/2/2020 858h Cale. 957
Calculated
QA Officer ' -Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page l 2 of 38
All anaJyses applicable to lhe CWA SOWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC prolocols Pertinent sampling informolion is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for lhe exclusi,·e use of lhe
~ddressee Pri, ile~es or sub~seq~ent ~~e or the ~:u:ne of !his .con,1pany or any ~mber of its slafT, or reproductio~ ~~ this repo~ in fon~ection~ with the ~,,ertise~nt, p~~moLio.n or sale of ?'!Y ~rod~cl or p~ocess, ~r in ~nn~c~ion w(lh th~ r~-publication of Lhis report
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
2006528-002A
Contact: Tanner Holliday
Client Sample ID: Ruin Spring
ANAi vr,c., , •ao a•roa11 s Collection Date: 6/16/2020 1035h
3440 South 700 West
,alt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone:[phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
!-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Received Date: 6/18/2020 11 OOh
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 6/19/2020 809h
Units: µg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Ch loromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Extracted:
Dilution Factor:
Test Code: 82600-W-DENlOO
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260D/5030C
Method: SW8260D
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
78-93-3 20.0 <20.0
67-64-1 20.0 <20.0
71-43-2 1.00 < 1.00
56-23-5 1.00 < 1.00
67-66-3 1.00 < 1.00
74-87-3 1.00 < 1.00
75-09-2 1.00 < 1.00
91-20-3 1.00 < 1.00
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
108-88-3 1.00 < 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00 < 1.00
Surrogate Units: µg/L CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
Surr: I ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
17060-07-0
460-00-4
1868-53-7
2037-26-5
47.7
51.9
47.1
52.7
50.00 95.5 72-151
50.00 104 80-152
50.00 94.2 72-135
50.00 105 80-124
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page 17 of38
All anal) ses applicable lo the CWA. SOWA. and RCRA ilf'e perfonned in accordance to NE LAC protocols Pertinent stimpling information is located on Lhe aUached COC Conridenti.:il Business lnformalion: This repon is pro\'ided for !he exclusi, e use of the
~ddressee Pri \ ile~es o.f sub~seq~nt ~~e of the !~~e of Lhis .con.1pany or an, ~mber of ils staff, or reproduclio~ ~f Lhis repo~ in ~on~1eclion~ ,,·iLll lhe ™!' ertisement, P~?motio.n or sale of~;~. ~rod~cl or p~ocess, ~r in ~onn:_c~ion w~Lh th~ r~-publicalion of this report
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: July 13, 2020
Company :
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Analytical for Annual Seeps & Springs 2020 ---Client Sample ID : Ruin Spring
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
514075002
Ground Water
16-JUN-20 10:35
19-JUN-20
Client
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00106
DNMI001
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty -----'---MDC RL Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method --------
lad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
]FPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
}ross Radium Alpha U 0.423 +/-0.231 0.741 1.00 pCi/L JXK3 07/01/20 1247 2013767
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
\1ethod Descri tion Anal st Comments
EPA903.0
;urrogate/Tracer Recovery Test Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
3arium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received" 95.5 (25%-125%)
~otes:
:::ounting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (I-sigma).
;RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Column headers are defined as follows:
DF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Page 13 of 18 SDG: 514075
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Lab Sample ID: 2006528-003
Client Sample ID: Cottonwood Spring
ANA l VTICAl LABORATORIES Collection Date: 6/16/2020 945h
Received Date: 6/18/2020 1100h
Analytical Results DISSOLVED METALS
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
3440 South 700 West Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
falt Lake City, UT 84119 Arsenic mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1330h E200.8 0.00500 < 0.00500
Beryllium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1356h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Cadmium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1330h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Calcium mg/L 6/19/2020 I 3 I 3h 7/1/2020 1908h E200.7 10.0 120 Phone:[phone] Chromium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1330h E200.8 0.0250 < 0.0250
Toll Free: [phone] Cobalt mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1330h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Fax: [phone] Copper mg/L 6/19/2020 13 I 3h 7/1/2020 1330h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
!-mail: [e-mail] Iron mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1356h E200.8 0.0300 < 0.0300
Lead mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1 /2020 1356h E200.8 0.00100 < 0.00100
web: www.awal-labs.com Magnesium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1908h E200.7 10.0 32.9
Manganese mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7 /l /2020 1330h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Mercury mg/L 6/24/2020 1313h 6/25/2020 923h E245.I 0.000500 < 0.000500
Kyle F. Gross Molybdenum mg/L 6/19/2020 13 l Jh 7/1/2020 1330h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Laboratory Director Nickel mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1330h E200.8 0.0200 < 0.0200
Potassium mg/L 6/19/2020 I 3 I 3h 7/3/2020 I 208h E200.7 1.00 7.14
Jose Rocha Selenium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1330h E200.8 0.00500 < 0.00500
QA Officer Silver mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1330h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Sodium mg/L 6/19/2020 13 13h 7/1/2020 1908h E200.7 10.0 273
Thallium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1356h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Tin mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1330h E200.8 0.100 < 0.100
Uranium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1430h E200.8 0.000300 0.0105
Vanadium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/3/2020 1208h E200.7 0.0150 < 0.0150
Zinc mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7 /I /2020 1330h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page 8 of38
All analyses applicable lo the CWA. SOWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols, Pertinent sampling information is located on the auached COC Confidential Business Cnformation: This report is pro,•ided for the exclush e use or the
~ddressee Pri, ile~es o~ sub .. seq~ent ~~e or lhe ~?':"e of this .co~puny or any ~rnber of ils staIT. or reproduclio~ ~f this repo~ in ~o~eclion~ wilh the a<!vertisement, P~?molio.n or sale or ?'!Y ~rod~ct or p~ocess, ~r in ~onni;c!ion w~lh lh~ r~-publication of lhis report
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Lab Sample ID: 2006528-003
Client Sample ID: Cottonwood Spring
A>I" Yf lCIIC I AOO~ATOR lf S Collection Date: 6/16/2020 945h
Received Date: 6/18/2020 1100h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
3440 South 700 West Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
,alt Lake City, UT 84119 Ammonia (as N) mg/L 6/25/2020 1035h 6/25/2020 2056h E350.l 0.0500 < 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mg/L 6/19/2020 808h SM2320B 1.00 280
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 6/19/2020 808h SM2320B 1.00 < 1.00
Phone:[phone] Chloride mg/L 6/25/2020 2050h E300.0 5.00 146
Toll Free: [phone] Fluoride mg/L 6/25/2020 22 l Jh E300.0 0.100 0.233
Fax: [phone] [on Balance % 7/2/2020 858h Cale. -100 5.98
!-mail: [e-mail] Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L 6/25/2020 1245h E353.2 0.100 < 0.100
Sulfate mg/L 6/25/2020 2050h E300.0 37.5 417
web: www.awal-labs.com Total Anions, Measured meq/L 7/2/2020 858h Cale. 18.4
Total Cations, meq/L 7/2/2020 858h Cale. 20.8
Measured
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 6/19/2020 1209h SM2540C 20.0 860 Kyle F. Gross Total Dissolved Solids 7/2/2020 858h Cale. 0.738
Laboratory Director Ratio,
Measured/Calculated
Jose Rocha Total Dissolved Solids, mg/L 7/2/2020 858h Cale. 1,160
Calculated
QA Officer
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page 13 of 38
All anal~ ses applicnble lo lhe CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are performed m accordance lo NELAC protocols Pertinent sompling informolion is loculed on the auached COC, Confidential Business Information: This report is prO\ ided for the exclusi, e use of the
~ddressee Pri\ ile~es oF sub ... seq~1enl ~~e of lhe ~~e of this .con:ipany or an~ ~mber of its slaff, or reproductio~ ~r this repo~ in ~on~eclion~ \\ ith the a~, ertisemenl. P~?motio.n or sale of ~!Y ~rod~ct or p~ocess, ~r in ':°"nt;c~ion ,v~lh lh~ r!-publicalion or this report
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
2006528-003A
Client Sample ID: Cottonwood Spring
ANAi vr,c•, , •0oa•roa1Fs Collection Date: 6/16/2020 945h
3440 South 700 West
,alt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax:[phone]
!-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Received Date: 6/18/2020 1100h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 6/19/2020 829h
Units: µg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Extracted:
Dilution Factor:
Contact: Tanner Holliday
Test Code: 8260D-W-DENIOO
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260D/5030C
Method: SW8260D
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
78-93-3 20.0 <20.0
67-64-1 20.0 <20.0
71-43-2 1.00 < 1.00
56-23-5 1.00 < 1.00
67-66-3 1.00 < 1.00
74-87-3 1.00 < 1.00
75-09-2 1.00 < 1.00
91-20-3 1.00 < 1.00
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
108-88-3 1.00 < 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00 < 1.00
Surrogate Units: µg/L CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Surr: l ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromotluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
17060-07-0
460-00-4
1868-53-7
2037-26-5
47.8
53.2
46.2
53.2
50.00 95.5 72-151
50.00 106 80-152
50.00 92.3 72-135
50.00 106 80-124
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page 18 of38
All analyses applicable lo the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are perfom1ed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is localed on Lhe attached COC Confidenliol Business Information: This report is pro\·ided for lhe e:xclusi\ e use of the
~ddressee. Pri, ile~es or sub .. seq~enl ~e or the ~?'.11e of this .co";pany or an~ ~mber or ils staII or reproducti~ ~r this repo~ in ~o~ecLion~ with lhe n~~·ertisemenl, P~?molio.n or saJe or ~y ~rod~cl or p~ocess, ~r in ~onn~!ion \\'!Lh 1h~ r:·publication or lhis report
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: July 13, 2020
Company:
Address:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: Analytical forAnnual Seeps & Springs 2020
Client Sample ID: Cottonwood Spring
Sample ID: 514075003
Matrix: Ground Water
Collect Date: 16-JUN-20 09:45
Receive Date: 19-JUN-20
Collector: Client
Parameter Qualifier Result ~ncertainty MDC RL
{ad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
]FPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
}ross Radium Alpha U 0.256 +/-0.209 0.721 1.00
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00106
DNMI001
Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCi/L JXK3 07/01/20 1247 2013767
~---------------vlethod Descri tion
EPA 903.0
;urrogate/Tracer Recovery Test ~------------3 ar i um Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
~otes:
:ounting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (I-sigma).
Anal st Comments
Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
97.4 (25%-125%)
;RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Column headers are defined as follows:
OF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Page 14 of 18 SDG: 514075
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Lab Sample ID: 2003627-001
Client Sample ID: Westwater Spring
Collection Date: 3/25/2020 1300h
Received Date: 3/27/2020 I IOOh
Analytical Results DISSOLVED METALS
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
3440 South 700 West Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
ialt Lake City, UT 841 19 Arsenic mg/L 4/5/2020 1039h 4/7/2020 1612h E200.8 0.00500 < 0.00500
Beryllium mg/L 4/5/2020 1039h 4/7/2020 1658h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Cadmium mg/L 4/5/2020 1039h 4/7/2020 1612h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Calcium mg/L 4/5/2020 I 039h 4/6/2020 1523h E200.7 10.0 118 Phone: [phone]
Chromium mg/L 4/5/2020 I 039h 4/7/2020 1612h E200.8 0.0250 < 0.0250
Toll Free: [phone] Cobalt mg/L 4/5/2020 I 039h 4/7/2020 1612h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Fax:[phone] Copper mg/L 4/5/2020 I 039h 4/7/2020 1612h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
:-mail: awal@ awal-labs.com Iron mg/L 4/5/2020 I 039h 4/7/2020 1658h E200.8 0.0300 0.401
Lead mg/L 4/5/2020 I039h 4/7/2020 1658h E200.8 0.00100 < 0.00100
web: www.awal-labs.com Magnesium mg/L 4/5/2020 I 039h 4/6/2020 1549h E200.7 1.00 30.8
Manganese mg/L 4/5/2020 I 039h 4/7/2020 1612h E200.8 0.0100 0.369
Mercury mg/L 3/27/2020 1335h 3/30/2020 I 003h E245.I 0.000500 < 0.000500
Kyle F. Gross Molybdenum mg/L 4/5/2020 I 039h 4/7/2020 1612h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Laboratory Director Nickel mg/L 4/5/2020 I 039h 4/7/2020 1612h E200.8 0.0200 < 0.0200
Potassium mg/L 4/5/2020 I 039h 4/6/2020 1549h E200.7 1.00 1.76
Jose Rocha Selenium mg/L 4/5/2020 I 039h 4/7/2020 1612h E200.8 0.00500 < 0.00500
QA Officer Silver mg/L 4/5/2020 I 039h 4/7/2020 1612h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Sodium mg/L 4/5/2020 I 039h 4/6/2020 1523h E200.7 10.0 117
Thallium mg/L 4/5/2020 I 039h 4/7/2020 1658h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Tin mg/L 4/5/2020 I 039h 4/7/2020 1612h E200.8 0.100 < 0.100
Uranium mg/L 4/5/2020 I 039h 4/7/2020 1712h E200.8 0.000300 0.00234
Vanadium mg/L 4/5/2020 I 039h 4/7/2020 1612h E200.8 0.0150 < 0.0150
Zinc mg/L 4/5/2020 I 039h 4/7/2020 1612h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Report Date: 4/10/2020 Page 5 of 26
All ano.l) ses applicable to 1he CW A. SOW A. and RCRA are perfom1ed in accordance to NELAC protocols, Per1inen1 samplin1: information is located on Lhe attached COC Confidential Business Information: This report is pro\'ided for the exclush e use of the
~ddrcssee Pri,•ile~es or su~seq~enl ~~e of lhe ~~e of this .co1~pany or Mr 1~mber of ils slnIT, or reproductio~ ~r this repo~ in .con?eclion .. with lhe ~vertisemenl, P~?motio.n ~r sale or ?1!Y ~rod1~ct or p~ocess, ~r in ~nn:c!ion w!th th~ r:-publicalion or this report
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Lab Sample ID: 2003627-001
American West Client Sample ID: Westwater Spring
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES Collection Date: 3/25/2020 1300h
Received Date: 3/27/2020 1100h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
3440 South 700 West Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
;alt Lake City, UT 84119 Ammonia ( as N) mg/L 4/1/2020 846h 4/2/2020 143 lh E350.1 0.0500 0.0593 '@
Bicarbonate (as mg/L 3/31/2020 729h SM2320B 1.00 270
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 3/31/2020 729h SM2320B 1.00 < 1.00
Phone: [phone] Chloride mg/L 4/1/2020 732h E300.0 2.00 26.6
Toll Free: [phone] Fluoride mg/L 4/1/2020 914h E300.0 0.100 0.555
Fax: [phone] Ion Balance % 4/6/2020 1631h Cale. -100 4.06
:-mail: [e-mail] Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L 4/2/2020 1028h E353.2 0.100 < 0.100
Sulfate mg/L 4/1/2020 732h E300.0 15.0 307
web: www.awal-labs.com Total Anions, Measured meq/L 4/6/2020 1631h Cale. 12.6
Total Cations, meq/L 4/6/2020 1631h Cale. 13.6
Measured
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 3/30/2020 1140h SM2540C 20.0 1,200 @ Kyle F. Gross Total Dissolved Solids 4/6/2020 1631h Cale. 1.57
Laboratory Director Ratio,
Measured/Calculated
Jose Rocha Total Dissolved Solids, mg/L 4/6/2020 163 \h Cale. 764
Calculated
QA Officer @ -High RPD due to suspected sample non-homogeneity or malrix interference.
1 -Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in con/rol as indicated by the LCS.
Report Date: 4/10/2020 Page 6 of 26
All analyses applicable to lhe CW A. SDW A. and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols, Pertinent sampling information is localed on the altached COC. Confidential Business Information: This report is pr°'•ided for the exclLLSive use or lhe
~ddressee Pri, ile~es or sub ... seq~ent ~~e of the ~~e of this .con_1pany or nny 1~~be1 of its staff, or reproductio~ ~f this repo~ in .co~1eclion ... ,1,,ilh lhe u~\•enisemenl, P~?motio.n ':r sale of ~!Y ~rod~cl or p1;ocess, ~r in ~nn:_c~ion w!lh th~ r~-publication of 1his report
3440 South 700 West
;alt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax:[phone]
:-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
2003627-00lA
Client Sample ID: Westwater Spring
Collection Date: 3/25/2020 1300h
Received Date: 3/27/2020 11 OOh
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 3/27/2020 1339h
Units: µg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate Units: µg/L
Surr: l,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
Extracted:
Dilution Factor:
CAS
17060-07-0
460-00-4
1868-53-7
2037-26-5
$ -This compound exceeded (low) the control limit for the CCV.
Contact: Tanner Holliday
Test Code: 8260D-W-DEN100
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260D/5030C
Method: SW8260D
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
78-93-3 20.0 <20.0
67-64-1 20.0 <20.0
71-43-2 1.00 < 1.00
56-23-5 1.00 < 1.00
67-66-3 1.00 < 1.00
74-87-3 1.00 < 1.00 $
75-09-2 1.00 < 1.00
91-20-3 1.00 < 1.00
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
108-88-3 1.00 < 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00 < 1.00
Result Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
51.5 50.00 103 72-151
50.5 50.00 101 80-152
48.3 50.00 96.5 72-135
48.9 50.00 97.8 80-124
Report Date: 4/10/2020 Page 7 of26
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols, Per1inent sampling information is located on the auached COC. Confidential Business Information: This repor1 is provided for the exclusive use of1he
~ddressee Pridle~es of sub .. seq~ent ~~e of lhe ~~e of I his .co1~pa11y or any ~mber of its staff, or reproductio.~ ?,f this repo~ in .co~eclion,, '"'ilh lhe ~' er1isemenl P~?moti~n ~r sale of ~r ~rod~cl or p~ocess, ~r in ~nni;c~ion w!lh 1h~ r1;-p~blicnlion or lhis report
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Company :
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID: _
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Certificate of Analysis
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Analytical forAnnual Seeps and Spring 2020
Westwater Spring
508151001
Ground Water
25-MAR-20 13:00
31-MAR-20
Client
Project:
Client ID:
Report Date: April 14, 2020
DNMI00106
DNMIOOI
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC RL Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method --------------------------------
lad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
]FPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
}ross Radium Alpha U 0.559 +/-0.300 0.926 LOO pCi/L JXK3 04/13/20 1310 1987404
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
\1ethod Description Anal st Comments
EPA 903.0
,urrogate/Tracer Recovery Test Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits ---='-----------=---------------------------3a r i um Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received" 101 (25%-125%)
"Jotes:
:ounting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (I-sigma).
,RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Column headers are defined as follows:
DF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Page 11 of 13 SDG: 508151
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Lab Sample ID: 2006528-00 I
Client Sample ID: Westwater Seep
0,41 H C•l I ~001U.TO!tl [8 Collection Date: 6/16/2020 845h
Received Date: 6/18/2020 1100h
Analytical Results DISSOLVED METALS
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
3440 South 700 West Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
;alt Lake City, UT 84119 Arsenic mg/L 6/19/2020 131 Jh 7/1/2020 1314h E200.8 0.00500 < 0.00500
Beryllium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1348h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Cadmium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1314h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Calcium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1851h E200.7 10.0 204 Phone: [phone] Chromium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1314h E200.8 0.0250 < 0.0250
Toll Free: [phone] Cobalt mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1314h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Fax: (80 I) 263-8687 Copper mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1314h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
!-mail: [e-mail] Iron mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1348h E200.8 0.0300 < 0.0300
Lead mg/L 6/19/2020 131 Jh 7/1/2020 1348h E200.8 0.00100 < 0.00100
web: www.awal-labs.com Magnesium mg/L 6/19/2020 131 Jh 7/1/2020 1851 h E200.7 10.0 54.6
Manganese mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 6/22/2020 1135h E200.8 0.0100 0.0354
Mercury mg/L 6/2412020 1313h 6125/2020 910h E245.l 0.000500 < 0.000500
Kyle F. Gross Molybdenum mg/L 6/1912020 1313h 711/2020 1314h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Laboratory Director Nickel mg/L 6/1912020 1313h 7/1/2020 1314h E200.8 0.0200 < 0.0200
Potassium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/3/2020 1158h E200.7 1.00 5.28
Jose Rocha Selenium mg/L 6119/2020 1313h 7/112020 1314h £200.8 0.00500 < 0.00500
QA Officer Silver mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/112020 1314h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Sodium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1851h E200.7 10.0 245
Thallium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/112020 1348h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Tin mg/L 6/1912020 131 Jh 71112020 1314h E200.8 0.100 <0.100
Uranium mg/L 6/1912020 1313h 7/112020 1424h E200.8 0.000300 0.0129
Vanadium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/3/2020 1158h E200.7 0.0150 < 0.0150
Zinc mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1314h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
1 -Analyte concentralion is too high for accurate matrix spike recovery and/or RPD.
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page 6 of 38
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance Lo NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling informalion is localed on the allached COC Confidential Business Information: This repon is pro\'ided for the exclusi,e use or the
~ddressee Pri, ile~es o~ sub .. seq~enl ~1~e of the ~~e of this .con:1pan~ or an~ ~mber of its staff, or reproductio~ ~f lhis repo~ in ~on~ection .. ,\ilh the n~rertise~enl, P~?motio.n ~r sale of ~y ~rod~cl or p~ocess, ~r in 7onn:c~ion w~Lh th~ r:·publicution or lhis report
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Lab Sample ID: 2006528-00 I
Client Sample ID: Westwater Seep
",J,111,1 VTICAI I AbO A,'1,tOlHf S Collection Date: 6/16/2020 845h
Received Date: 6/18/2020 1100h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
3440 South 700 West Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
)alt Lake City, UT 84119 Ammonia (as N) mg/L 6/25/2020 I 035h 6/25/2020 2048h E350.l 0.0500 < 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mg/L 6/19/2020 808h SM23208 1.00 450
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 6/19/2020 808h SM23208 1.00 < 1.00
Phone:[phone] Chloride mg/L 6/25/2020 1909h E300.0 4.00 40.6
Toll Free: [phone] Fluoride mg/L 6/25/2020 2 l 40h E300.0 0.100 0.429
Fax: [phone] Ion Balance % 7/2/2020 858h Cale. -100 12.7
!-mail: [e-mail] Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L 6/25/2020 l 242h E353.2 0.100 < 0.100
Sulfate mg/L 6/25/2020 1909h E300.0 30.0 460
web: www.awal-labs.com Total Anions, Measured meq/L 7/2/2020 858h Cale. 19.7
Total Cations, meq/L 7/2/2020 858h Cale. 25.5
Measured
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 6/19/2020 1209h SM2540C 20.0 1,480 Kyle F. Gross Total Dissolved Solids 7/2/2020 858h Cale. 1.16
Laboratory Director Ratio,
Measured/Calculated
Jose Rocha Total Dissolved Solids, mg/L 7/2/2020 858h Cale. 1,280
Calculated
QA Officer
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page 11 of38
All anal) ses applicable Lo the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on Lhe auached COC. Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusi,e use of the
!ddressee Pri, ile~es o_f sub,;eq~ent ~~e of !he ~~e or I his .co"!pany or an) ~mber or ils staff. or reproduclio~ ~f this repo~ in ~on~ectio~ \\ilh the a~vertisemenl, P~?motio
1
n or sale or~) rrod~cl or P~?cess, ?r in ~onn:c~ion "!lh th; r~-publicalion of this report
3440 South 700 West
;alt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone:[phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
2006528-00IA
Client Sample ID: Westwater Seep
Collection Date: 6/16/2020 845h
Received Date: 6/18/2020 11 OOh
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 6/19/2020 749h
Units: µg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Extracted:
Dilution Factor:
Contact: Tanner Holliday
Test Code: 8260D-W-DEN100
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260D/5030C
Method: SW8260D
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
78-93-3 20.0 <20.0
67-64-1 20.0 <20.0
7 l-43-2 1.00 < 1.00
56-23-5 1.00 < 1.00
67-66-3 1.00 < 1.00
74-87-3 1.00 < 1.00
75-09-2 1.00 < 1.00
91-20-3 1.00 < 1.00
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
108-88-3 1.00 < 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00 < 1.00
Surrogate Units: µg/L CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
Surr: l,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
17060-07-0
460-00-4
1868-53-7
2037-26-5
46.7
51.4
46.4
52.0
50.00 93.4 72-151
50.00 103 80-152
50.00 92.8 72-135
50.00 104 80-124
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page 16 of38
All analyses applicable lo the CWA, SOWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance Lo NELAC protocols. Per1inenl sampling information is localed on lhe altached COC Confidential Business rnformalion: This report is prO\'ided for the exclusi\ e use or the
!ddressee. Pri, ile~es o_fsub~seq~enl ~e or the ~~e of this .con:ipany or anr ~mber of its staff, or reproduclio~ ~f lhis repo~ in ~o~ection,, wilh lhe ~vertisemenl, P~?molio.n or sale of ~y ~rod~cl or P~?cess. ~r in ~onn~c!ion w~th th~ r:-publication of this report
Company:
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Analytical forAnnual Seeps & Springs 2020
Westwater Seep
514075001
Ground Water
16-JUN-20 08:45
19-JUN-20
Client
----Project:
Client ID:
Report Date:
DNMI00106
DNMIOOI
July 13, 2020
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC RL Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method -----------{ad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
3FPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
}rossRadiumAlpha U 0.119 +/-0.191 0.721 1.00 pCi/L JXK3 07/01/20 1247 2013767
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
\1ethod Descri tion ____________________ An~al.Y.st Comm~nts
EPA 903.0
1urrogate/Tracer Recovery Test Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
3arium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received" 87.9 (25%-125%)
~otes:
:ounting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (I-sigma).
1RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Column headers are defined as follows:
DF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Page 12 of 18 SDG: 514075
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Lab Sample ID: 2006528-004
Client Sample ID: Entrance Seep
u a L~11c At 1 ~ooq .. ron 11 s Collection Date: 6/16/2020 1105h
Received Date: 6/18/2020 1100h
Analytical Results DISSOLVED METALS
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
3440 South 700 West Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
,alt Lake City, UT 84119 Arsenic mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1333h E200.8 0.00500 < 0.00500
Beryllium mg/L 6/19/2020 I 3 I 3h 7/1/2020 1359h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Cadmium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1333h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Phone: [phone] Calcium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1910h E200.7 10.0 144
Chromium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1333h E200.8 0.0250 < 0.0250
foll Free: [phone] Cobalt mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1333h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Fax: [phone] Copper mg/L 6/19/2020 13 I 3h 7/1/2020 I 333h E200.8 0.0100 <0.0100
~-mail: [e-mail] Iron mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1359h E200.8 0.0300 < 0.0300
Lead mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1359h E200.8 0.00100 < 0.00100
web: www.awal-labs.com Magnesium mg/L 6/19/2020 131 Jh 7/1/2020 1910h E200.7 10.0 45.1
Manganese mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1333h E200.8 0.0100 0.0563
Mercury mg/L 6/24/2020 1313h 6/25/2020 925h E245.I 0.000500 < 0.000500
Kyle F. Gross Molybdenum mg/L 6/19/2020 13 I 3h 7/1/2020 1333h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Laboratory Director Nickel mg/L 6/19/2020 131 Jh 7/1/2020 1333h E200.8 0.0200 < 0.0200
Potassium mg/L 6/19/2020 I 3 I 3h 7/3/2020 121 lh E200.7 l.00 4.31
Jose Rocha Selenium mg/L 6/19/2020 13 I 3h 7/1/2020 1333h E200.8 0.00500 0.0150
QA Officer Silver mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1333h E200.8 0.0100 <0.0100
Sodium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1910h E200.7 10.0 108
Thallium mg/L 6/19/2020 I 313h 7/1/2020 1359h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Tin mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1333h E200.8 0.100 < 0.100
Uranium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1433h E200.8 0.000300 0.0247
Vanadium mg/L 6/19/2020 I 3 I 3h 7/3/2020 121 lh E200.7 0.0150 < 0.0150
Zinc mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1333h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page 9 of38
All analyses applicable to Lhe CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on Lhe attached COC Confidenlinl Business Information: This repon is pro\'ided for the exclusi\e use of the
~ddressee Pri, ile~es o:sub~seq~tenl ~e of the ~~e of lhis _co~pan~ or an~ ~mber of iLs slaIT. or reproduclio~ ~f lhis repo~ in .con~ection~ with lhe a~vertisemenl. P~?moli°:" or sale or~~ ~rod~cl or p~ocess. ~r in ~onn:c!ion \\!th lh~ r:-publication of this report
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Lab Sample ID: 2006528-004
Client Sample ID: Entrance Seep
Collection Date: 6/16/2020 1105h
Received Date: 6/18/2020 l lOOh
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
3440 South 700 West Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
;alt Lake City, UT 84119 Ammonia (as N) mg/L 6/25/2020 I 035h 6/25/2020 2057h E350.l 0.0500 < 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mg/L 6/19/2020 808h SM2320B 1.00 242
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 6/19/2020 808h SM2320B 1.00 < 1.00
Phone: [phone] Chloride mg/L 6/25/2020 2 !06h E300.0 2.00 76.7
Toll Free: [phone] Fluoride mg/L 6/25/2020 2247h E300.0 0.100 0.638
Fax: (80 I) 263-8687 Ion Balance % 7/2/2020 858h Cale. -100 7.00
!-mail: [e-mail] Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L 6/25/2020 1359h E353.2 0.100 2.46
Sulfate mg/L 6/25/2020 2106h E300.0 15.0 317
web: www.awa1-labs.com Total Anions, Measured meq/L 7/2/2020 858h Cale. 13.7
Total Cations, meq/L 7/2/2020 858h Cale. 15.7
Measured
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 6/19/2020 1209h SM2540C 20.0 964 Kyle F. Gross Total Dissolved Solids 7/2/2020 858h Cale. 1.14
Laboratory Director Ratio,
Measured/Calculated
Jose Rocha Total Dissolved Solids, mg/L 7/2/2020 858h Cale. 843
Calculated
QA Officer
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page 14 of 38
All anal~ses applicable to lhe CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are perfom,ed in accordonce lo NELAC prolocols Pertinent sampling informal ion is located on 1he attached COC Conridentinl Business Information: This report is prO\'ided for the exclusive use or the
~ddressee. Pri, i\e~es o:sub,.seq~enl ~e or1he ~~,e of this .co"'}pany or an~ ~'?1ber of ils staff. or reproducti~ ~~this repo~ in ~on~eclion~ with the n~,er1isemenl, P~?moti~n or sale of~~·. ~rod~cl or p~ocess, ~r in 7onn:_c~ion 1v!Lh th~ r:_-publicalion or this report
3440 South 700 West
;alt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
foll Free: [phone]
Fax: (80 I) 263-8687
!-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
2006528-004A
Client Sample ID: Entrance Seep
Collection Date: 6/16/2020 1105h
Received Date: 6/18/2020 11 OOh
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 6/19/2020 850h
Units: µg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Extracted:
Dilution Factor:
Contact: Tanner Holliday
Test Code: 8260D-W-DENIOO
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260D/5030C
Method: SW8260D
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
78-93-3 20.0 <20.0
67-64-1 20.0 <20.0
71-43-2 1.00 < 1.00
56-23-5 1.00 < 1.00
67-66-3 1.00 < 1.00
74-87-3 1.00 < 1.00
75-09-2 1.00 < 1.00
91-20-3 1.00 < 1.00
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
108-88-3 1.00 < 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00 < 1.00
Surrogate Units: µg/L CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
17060-07-0
460-00-4
1868-53-7
2037-26-5
47.4 50.00
52.7 50.00
46.2 50.00
52.9 50.00
94.8 72-151
105 80-152
92.5 72-135
106 80-124
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page 19 of38
All analyses applicable 10 lhe CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC prolocols Per1inenL sampling inrormation is located on the auached COC Confidential Business Informalion: This report is provided for !he exclusi,e use of lhe
~ddressee Pri,·ile~es o~ sub ... seq~nl ~e of the ~~e of this .con_ipnny or M) ~mber or its staff, or reproductio~ ~! this repo~ in :on~eclion ... \\ilh the ~\'ertisement, P~?moli°:'1 or saJe of :1'2.Y ~rod~ct or pi;ocess, ~r in ~onn:_cfion \\'!lh th~ r~-publication of this report
Company:
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Analytical for Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Entrance Seep
514075004
Ground Water
l 6-JUN-20 11 :05
19-JUN-20
Client
----Project:
Client ID:
Report Date:
DNMI00106
DNMIOOI
July 13, 2020
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC RL Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method -"---------------
lad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
}FPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
}ross Radium Alpha U 0.453 +/-0.229 0.722 1.00 pCi/L JXK3 07/01/20 1247 2013767
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
\1ethod ----------------~A~n~~,Jyst Comments
;urrogate/Tracer Recovery Test ___________ R_e_s_u_lt __ N_o_m_in_a_l __ R_e_c_o_v_ery,% Acceptable Limits
3arium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received" 95.5 (25%-125%)
'lotes:
:ounting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (I-sigma).
;RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Column headers are defined as follows:
DF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Page 15 of 18 SDG: 514075
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Lab Sample ID: 2006528-005
Client Sample ID: Back Spring
ANAl'Vf tC A I I AO O RATORIFS Collection Date: 6/16/2020 945h
Received Date: 6/18/2020 1100h
Analytical Results DISSOLVED METALS
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
3440 South 700 West Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
,alt Lake City, UT 84119 Arsenic mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1336h E200.8 0.00500 < 0.00500
Beryllium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1402h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Cadmium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1336h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Phone: [phone] Calcium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1921h E200.7 10.0 124
Chromium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7 /I /2020 1336h E200.8 0.0250 < 0.0250
foll Free: [phone] Cobalt mg/L 6/19/2020 13 13h 7/1/2020 1336h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Fax: [phone] Copper mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1336h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
!-mail: [e-mail] Iron mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7 / l/2020 1402h E200.8 0.0300 < 0.0300
Lead mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1402h E200.8 0.00100 < 0.00100
web: www.awal-labs.com Magnesium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1921 h E200.7 10.0 33.7
Manganese mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1336h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Mercury mg/L 6/24/2020 1313h 6/25/2020 932h E245.l 0.000500 < 0.000500
Kyle F. Gross Molybdenum mg/L 6/19/2020 l 3 l 3h 7/1/2020 1336h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Laboratory Director Nickel mg/L 6/19/2020 13 13h 7/1/2020 1336h E200.8 0.0200 < 0.0200
Potassium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/3/2020 1214h E200.7 1.00 7.23
Jose Rocha Selenium mg/L 6/19/2020 131 Jh 7/1/2020 1336h E200.8 0.00500 < 0.00500
QA Officer Silver mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1336h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Sodium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1921h E200.7 10.0 282
Thallium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1402h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Tin mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7 /I /2020 1336h E200.8 0.100 <0.100
Uranium mg/L 6/19/2020 131 3h 7/1 /2020 1436h E200.8 0.000300 0.0107
Vanadium mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/3/2020 1214h E200.7 0.0150 < 0.0150
Zinc mg/L 6/19/2020 1313h 7/1/2020 1336h E200.8 0.0100 <0.0100
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page IO of 38
All anal~ ses api,licable to [he CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are perfom1ed in accordance Lo NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling inrormalion is localed on Lhe attached COC Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for1he exclusive use of the
~ddressee Pri, ile~es o! sub.seq~nl .~e of Lhe ~~e of this _con:1pany or an~ ~mber of its staJI or reproductio~ ~f Lhis repo~ in ~~eel ion~ \Vilh the ~:ertise~en(.. P~?moli~ or saJe of~~: ~rod~cl or p~ocess, ~r in 7onn:c!ion w!lh lh~ r:-publication of this report
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Lab Sample ID: 2006528-005
Client Sample ID: Back Spring
t.H AI 'fTICA I I An011.AT0 Rlt:S Collection Date: 6/16/2020 945h
Received Date: 6/18/2020 l lOOh
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
3440 South 700 West Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
falt Lake City, UT 84119 Ammonia (as N) mg/L 6/25/2020 1035h 6/25/2020 2058h E350.1 0.0500 < 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mg/L 6/19/2020 808h SM2320B 1.00 284
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 6/19/2020 808h SM2320B 1.00 < 1.00
Phone: [phone] Chloride mg/L 6/25/2020 2123h E300.0 5.00 147
Toll Free: [phone] Fluoride mg/L 6/25/2020 2230h E300.0 0.100 0.240
Fax: (80 I) 263-8687 Ion Balance % 7/2/2020 858h Cale. -100 6.85
!-mail: [e-mail] Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L 6/25/2020 t 249h E353.2 0.100 <0.100
Sulfate mg/L 6/25/2020 2123h E300.0 37.5 424
web: www.awal-labs.com Total Anions, Measured meq/L 7/2/2020 858h Cale. 18.7
Total Cations, meq/L 7/2/2020 858h Cale. 21.4
Measured
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 6/19/2020 t 209h SM2540C 20.0 1,280 Kyle F. Gross Total Dissolved Solids Cale. 1.07 7/2/2020 858h
Laboratory Director Ratio,
Measured/Calculated
Jose Rocha Total Dissolved Solids, mg/L 7/2/2020 858h Cale. 1,190
Calculated
QA Officer
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page 15 of38
All analyses applicable lo the CWA. SOWA. and RCRA are performed m accordance lo NELAC prolocols Pertinenl sampling information is located on the allad1ed COC Conlidential Business Information: This report is provided for lhe exclusi\ e use oflhe
~ddressee Pri, ile~es o~ sub .. seq~ent .u!e or lhe ~~e or this .con.1pany or an~· ~mber of iLs staff or reproduclio~ ~f lhis repo~ in ~on'.1eclion~ \dth lhe .,~, ertisement. P~?mo1io0n or sale of~!) ~rod~cl or p~ocess, ~r in ~onn~c~ion "~th th~ r~-publicalion of this report
3440 South 700 West
,alt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone:[phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: (80 I) 263-8687
!-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
2006528-005A
Client Sample ID: Back Spring
Collection Date: 6/16/2020 945h
Received Date: 6/18/2020 1100h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 6/19/2020 910h
Units: µg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorofonn
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Extracted:
Dilution Factor:
Contact: Tanner Holliday
Test Code: 82600-W-DENlOO
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260D/5030C
Method: SW8260D
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
78-93-3 20.0 <20.0
67-64-1 20.0 <20.0
71-43-2 1.00 < 1.00
56-23-5 1.00 < 1.00
67-66-3 1.00 < 1.00
74-87-3 1.00 < 1.00
75-09-2 1.00 < 1.00
91-20-3 1.00 < 1.00
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
108-88-3 1.00 < 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00 < 1.00
Surrogate Units: µg/L CAS Result Amount piked %REC Limits Qual
Surr: I ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
17060-07-0
460-00-4
1868-53-7
2037-26-5
47.3
52.1
46.7
52.9
50.00 94.6 72-151
50.00 104 80-152
50.00 93.3 72-135
50.00 106 80-124
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page 20 of38
All analyses applicable lo lhe CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance lo NE LAC prolocols Pertinent sampling informalion is located on the altached COC. Confidential Business Information: This report is pro,·ided for lhe exclusive use of the
~ddressee Pri \ ilc~es o_f sub__seq~enl ~e of the ~~e of I his .con_1pany or any ~mber of its stllff, or reproducli~ ~f I his repo~ in ~on~ection" with the ~,,ertisemenl, P~?molio.n or saJe of~~ ~rod~ct or p~ocess, ~r in ~onn:'~ion ,,·~th lh~ r:-publicalion of lhis report
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: July I 3, 2020
Company :
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: Analytical for Annual Seeps & Springs 2020 -------Client Sample ID: Back Spring
Sample ID: 514075005
Matrix: Ground Water
Collect Date: 16-JUN-20 09:45
Receive Date: l 9-JUN-20
Collector: Client
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty
lad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
]FPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
,ross Radium Alpha U -0.00212 +/-0.191
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
\1ethod Descri tion
EPA 903.0
Test
MDC
0.739
~rrogate/Tracer Recovery
3arium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
1fotes:
:ounting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (I-sigma).
RL
1.00
---~-------------
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00106
DNMIOOI
Units PF OF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCi/L JXK3 07/01/20 1247 2013767
Result
Analvst Comments
Nominal Recovery%
95.9
Acceptable Limits
(25%-125%)
iRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Column headers are defined as follows:
DF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Page 16 of 18 SDG: 514075
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
3440 South 700 West
,alt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
:-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
2003627-002A
Client Sample ID: Trip Blank
Collection Date: 3/25/2020 1300h
Received Date: 3/27/2020 1100h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 3/27/2020 1418h
Units: µg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate Units: µg/L
Surr: l ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
Extracted:
Dilution Factor:
CAS
17060-07-0
460-00-4
1868-53-7
2037-26-5
1
Contact: Tanner Holliday
Test Code: 82600-W-DENlOO
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260D/5030C
Method: SW8260D
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
78-93-3 20.0 <20.0
67-64-1 20.0 <20.0
71-43-2 1.00 < 1.00
56-23-5 1.00 < 1.00
67-66-3 1.00 < 1.00
74-87-3 1.00 < 1.00
75-09-2 1.00 < 1.00
91-20-3 1.00 < 1.00
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
108-88-3 1.00 < 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00 < 1.00
Result Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
53.0 50.00 106 72-151
50.8 50.00 102 80-152
49.0 50.00 98.0 72-135
49.3 50.00 98.6 80-124
Report Date: 4/10/2020 Page 8 of26
All analyses applicable lo lhe CWA. SOWA. and RCRA nre perfo,rned in accordance 10 NELAC protocols_ Pertinenl sampling information is localed on the attnched COC Confidenlial Business Jnfonnotion: This repon is pro\•ided for lhe e.~clush e use of lhe
~ddressee Prhile~es o.fsub,_seq~nl ~;e of lhe ~?':'1e of this .con;ipany or nnr ~mber of its st:irT, or reproducli~ ~~this repo~ in .c~teclion .. "~lh the a~vertise~nt, P~?motio.n ~r ~ale of~!Y ~rod~cl or pi:ocess, ~r in 7°nn~c!ion "'!'h th~ r~-p~blication of I.his report
/INo\t'W f lCA( I Afl ORAJOJJ IEi
3440 South 700 West
,alt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone:[phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
!-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, [nc.
Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
2006528-006A
Client Sample ID: Trip Blank
Collection Date: 6/16/2020
Received Date: 6/18/2020
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 6/19/2020 930h
Units: µg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate Units: µg/L
Surr: l ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
845h
1100h
Extracted:
Dilution Factor:
CAS
17060-07-0
460-00-4
1868-53-7
2037-26-5
Contact: Tanner Holliday
Test Code: 8260D-W-DEN100
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260D/5030C
Method: SW8260D
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qua!
78-93-3 20.0 <20.0
67-64-1 20.0 <20.0
71-43-2 1.00 < 1.00
56-23-5 1.00 < 1.00
67-66-3 1.00 < 1.00
74-87-3 1.00 < 1.00
75-09-2 1.00 < 1.00
91-20-3 1.00 < 1.00
109-99-9 1.00 3.83
108-88-3 1.00 < 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00 < 1.00
Result Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
48.0 50.00 96.1 72-151
53.1 50.00 106 80-152
46.1 50.00 92.3 72-135
52.8 50.00 106 80-124
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page 21 of38
All anal)ses applicable lo lhe CWA, SDWA. and RCRA are perfom1ed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Per1inent sampling inrormaLion is located on the allached COC, Confidential Business lnformulion: This report is pr°' ided for lhe excJUSi\ e use of !he
~ddressee. Pri\ ile~es of sub.5eq~enl ~e of the ~~e of this _co~pnn~· or anr ~mber of its staIT. or reproduclio~ ~~ Lhis repo~ in .con~1ection~ wilh the~' ertisemenL p~~motio.n or saJe of :u!Y ~rod~ct or p~ocess, ~r in ~onn:c~ion w~lh th~ r:-publication of this report
3440 South 700 West
;alt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone:[phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
:-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Tanner Holliday
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 South Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
TEL: [phone]
RE: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Dear Tanner Holliday: Lab Set ID: 2003627
American West Analytical Laboratories received sample(s) on 3/27/2020 for the analyses
presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AWAL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) in Utah and Texas; and is
state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, Wyoming, and Missouri.
All analyses were performed in accordance to the NELAP protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation scope documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
Thank You,
Digitally signed by Jose G.
J OS e G ~~~~~=Jose G. Rocha,
• o=American West Analytical
Laboratories, ou=UT00031, RO Ch a ~:[e-mail],
Date: 2020.04.10 16:38:50
Approved by: -os·oo·
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 4/10/2020 Page I of 26
All analyses applicable to lhe CW A. SOWA and RCRA are perfom1ed in accordance lo NELAC protocols. Pertinen1 sampling information is localed on lhe attached COC. (lf1tidi:nliul Business Informal ion: This report is provided for the bS.Clt~\"'<! I.do of the
!ddressee Pri,-ile~es o! su~seq~t ~;e of the ~~ne of this .con:ipany or M) ~mbei of its s1arr, or reproducli~ ~~this repo~ in ~on~eclion~ ,vilh the a~Yertise~nl, P~?moliO:,' ~r~c: or?'~: ~rod~ct or P~?Cess, ~r in ~nn~c!ion w!th th~ r~-p~blicntlan of lhis reporl
American West Client:
ANALYTICAL lABORATORIE6 Project:
Lab Set ID:
Date Received:
Lab Sample ID
3440 South 700 West
2003627-00IA
,alt Lake City, UT 84119
2003627-0018
2003627-0018
Phone: [phone] 2003627-00lC
Toll Free: [phone] 2003627-00JD
Fax:[phone] 2003627-001 D
:-mail : [e-mail] 2003627-00IE
web: www.awal-labs.com 2003627-00 IE
2003627-00lE
2003627-00IE
Kyle F. Gross 2003627-002A
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
2003627
Contact: Tanner Holliday
3/27/2020 1100h
Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
Westwater Spring 3/25/2020 1300h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260D/5030C
Westwater Spring 3/25/2020 1300h Aqueous Alkalinity/ Bicarbonate/
Carbonate, Low Level
Westwater Spring 3/25/2020 1300h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Westwater Spring 3/25/2020 1300h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
Westwater Spring 3/25/2020 1300h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
Westwater Spring 3/25/2020 1300h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Westwater Spring 3/25 /2020 1300h Aqueous Mercury, Drinking Water
Dissolved
Westwater Spring 3/25/2020 1300h Aqueous ICPMS Metals, Dissolved
Westwater Spring 3/25/2020 1300h Aqueous ICP Metals, Dissolved
Westwater Spring 3/25/2020 1300h Aqueous Ion Balance
Trip Blank 3/25/2020 1300h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260D/5030C
Report Date: 4/10/2020 Page 2 of 26
All analyses applicable to lhe CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling informiltion is Jocuted on lhe attached COC. Confidentiol Business Jnformation: This repon is prO\•ided for the e.xclush e use of the
~ddressee Pri\ ile~es of sub .. seq~enl ~~e or the ~?':"e of this .con_ipany or nn} ~';'ber or its slaff, or reproducti~ ~f this repo~ in ~on~lection .. v.,i1h lhe o~,•enisement, P~?motio.n ~r ~aJe of~!)~ ~rod~cl or P~?cess, ~r in ~nn:_c~ion w!lh th~ r~-publicruion of this repon
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
3440 South 700 West
;alt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone:[phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax:[phone]
!-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Inorganic Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Tanner Holliday
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
2003627
3/27/2020
3/25/2020
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation of all
samples were performed within the method holding times. All samples were properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPO:
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in contr?l.
Matrix Spike / Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, with the
following exception: the MS percent recovery, MSD percent recovery, and RPO for
Ammonia on sample 2003627-001 were outside of the control limits due to sample
non-homogeneity and/or sample matrix interference.
Duplicate (DUP): The RPO for Total Dissolved Solids on sample 2003627-001
was outside of the control limits due to sample non-homogeneity or sample matrix
interference.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 4/10/2020 Page 3 of 26
All anal)ses applicable to lhe CWA SOWA, and RCRA are perfomied in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinenl sampling infonnation is located on the etlached COC Confidential Business lnfonno1ion: This reporl is pro,ided ror 1he exclusi, e use 0C1he
~ddressee Pri,·ile~es o_r sub,_seq~eni ~~e or the ~~e of this .co1~pany or MY ~mber of its staff, or reproductio~ ~f this repo~ in fOl~eclioo .. "~th the a~vertisement. p~~motio,n ~r saJe of~!~: ~rodl~l or p~~cess, ~r in ~nn~~ion w!th lh~ r~-publication of lhis report
American West
ANALYTICAL LAB0RAT0Rlf6
3440 South 700 West
~alt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
:-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Volatile Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Tanner Holliday
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
Method:
Analysis:
Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
2003627
3/27/2020
3/25/2020
Intact
None
SW-846 8260D/5030C
Volatile Organic Compounds
General Set Comments: No target analytes were observed above reporting limits.
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: All samples were received in appropriate
containers and properly preserved. The analysis and preparation of all samples were
performed within the method holding times following the methods stated on the analytical
reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met, with CCV exceptions noted on the reports. All internal standard
recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, and Surrogates:
Method Blanks (MBs): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCSs): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike / Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Surrogates: All surrogate recoveries were within established limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 4/10/2020 Page 4 of 26
All annlyses applicable to the CWA. SOWA. and RCRA nre perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Peninenl sampJin1:, informa1ion is located on the attached COC. Confidenlial Business Jnformation: This repon is pro,•ided for the exclusi, e use of the
~ddressec Privile~es o_f sub .. seq~enl ~1;e of the ~~e of !his .co"?pony or nnr ~mber of its s13IT, or reproduclio~ ~f this repo~ in .con?eclion .. \\~th the n~, ertisemenl, P~?moli~ or sale of?'!): ~rod~ct or p~ocess, ~r in ~onn~c!ion w(th lh~ r~-publication of this report
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone] Laboratory Director
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES , C SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Lab Set ID: 2003627 Dept: ME
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020 QC Type: LCS -~-
Reporting Amount Spiked Spike Ref. RPO Ref. RPO
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Amount %REC Limits Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Lab Sample ID: LCS-69049 Date Analyzed: 04/06/2020 1518h
Test Code: 200.7-DIS Date Prepared: 04/05/2020 l 039h
Calcium 9.89 mg/L E200.7 0.211 1.00 10.00 0 98.9 85 -115
Magnesium 10.4 mg/L E200.7 0.0654 1.00 10.00 0 104 85 -115
Potassium 10.6 mg/L E200.7 0.246 1.00 10.00 0 106 85 -115
Sodium 10.5 mg/L E200.7 0.123 1.00 10.00 0 105 85 -115
Lab Sample ID: LCS-69050 Date Analyzed: 04/07/2020 1333h
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared: 04/05/2020 1039h
Arsenic 0.200 mg/L E200.8 0.000298 0.00200 0.2000 0 100 85 -115
Beryllium 0.203 mg/L E200.8 0.000198 0.00200 0.2000 0 101 85 -115
Cadmium 0.201 mg/L E200.8 0.0000742 0.000500 0.2000 0 100 85 -115
Chromium 0.197 mg/L E200.8 0.00191 0.00200 0.2000 0 98.4 85 -115
Cobalt 0.203 mg/L E200.8 0.000300 0.00400 0.2000 0 101 85 -115
Copper 0.199 mg/L E200.8 0.00166 0.00200 0.2000 0 99.3 85 -115
Iron 0.984 mg/L E200.8 0.0328 0.100 1.000 0 98.4 85 -115
Lead 0.200 mg/L E200.8 0.000448 0.00200 0.2000 0 JOO 85 -115
Manganese 0.197 mg/L E200.8 0.000766 0.00200 0.2000 0 98.3 85 -115
Molybdenum 0.204 mg/L E200 8 0.000652 0.00200 0.2000 0 102 85 -115
Nickel 0.200 mg/L E200.8 0.000728 0.00200 0.2000 0 99.8 85 -115
Selenium 0.192 mg/L E200,8 0.000508 0.00200 0.2000 0 95.9 85 -115
Silver 0.201 mg/L E200.8 0.000232 0.00200 0.2000 0 100 85 -115
Thallium 0.198 mg/L E200.8 0.000390 0.00200 0.2000 0 99.0 85 -115
Tin 1.03 mg/L E200,8 0.00115 0.00400 1.000 0 103 85 -115
Uranium 0.214 mg/L E200,8 0.000176 0.00200 0.2000 0 107 85 -115
Zinc 0.982 mg/L E200,8 0.00418 0.00600 1.000 0 98.2 85 -115
Lab Sample ID: LCS-69050 Date Analyzed: 04/08/2020 1252h
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared: 04/05/2020 1039h
Vanadium 0.208 mg/L E200.8 0.00152 0.00440 0.2000 0 104 85 -115
Report Date: 4/10/2020 Page 9 of26
analyses applicable to the CWA. SOWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use of ti-
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement_ promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 2003627
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: LCS-68916 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: HG-DW-DIS-245.1 Date Prepared:
Mercury 0.00358
Units
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Tanner Holliday
Dept: ME
QC Type: LCS
Reporting Amount Spiked Spike Ref.
Method MDL Limit Amount %REC
03/30/2020 IOO!h
03/27/2020 1335h
mg/L E245.I 0.0000396 0.0000900 0.003330 0 107
Limits
85 -115
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPO Ref. RPO
Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Report Date: 4/10/2020 Page IO of 26
analyses applicable to the CW A. SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC Confidential Business lnfonnation: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privile<>,,es of subsequent use of It
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
American West
APULYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 2003627
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: MB-69049 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.7-DIS Date Prepared:
Calcium < 1.00
Magnesium < l.00
Potassium < 1.00
Sodium < l.00
Lab Sample ID: MB-FIL TER-68854 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.7-DJS Date Prepared:
Calcium < l.00
Magnesium < l.00
Potassium < 1.00
Sodium < 1.00
Lab Sample ID: MB-69050 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared:
Beryllium < 0.000200
Iron < 0.0100
Lead < 0.000200
Thallium < 0.000200
Uranium < 0.000200
Lab Sample ID: MB-69050 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared:
Arsenic < 0.00200
Cadmium < 0.000500
Chromium < 0.00200
Cobalt < 0.00400
Copper < 0.00200
Manganese < 0.00200
Molybdenum < 0.00200
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 841 I 9
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount Spiked
Units Method MDL Limit
04/06/2020 1515h
04/05/2020 1039h
mg/L E200.7 0.211 1.00
mg/L E200.7 0.0654 1.00
mg/L E200.7 0.246 1.00
mg/L E200.7 0.123 1.00
04/06/2020 1536h
04/05/2020 I 039h
mg/L E200.7 0.211 1.00
mg/L E200.7 0.0654 1.00
mg/L E200.7 0.246 1.00
mg/L E200.7 0.123 1.00
04/07/2020 1327h
04/05/2020 1039h
mg/L E200.8 0.0000198 0.000200
mg/L E200 8 0.00328 0.0100
mg/L E200.8 0.0000448 0.000200
mg/L E200.8 0.0000390 0.000200
mg/L E200.8 0.0000176 0.000200
04/07/2020 1330h
04/05/2020 1039h
mg/L E200.8 0.000298 0.00200
mg/L E200.8 0.0000742 0.000500
mg/L E200.8 0.00191 0.00200
mg/L E200.8 0.000300 0.00400
mg/L E200.8 0.00166 0.00200
mg/L E200.8 0.000766 0.00200
mg/L E200.8 0.000652 0.00200
Tanner Holliday
ME
MBLK
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPO Ref. RPO
Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Report Date: 4/10/2020 Page 11 of26
analyses applicable to the CWA. SOWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Priv~eges of subsequent use of ti-
ne of this company or any member of its staff. or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement,. promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact.. This
ANALYTIC AL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 2003627
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: MB-69050 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared:
Nickel < 0.00200
Selenium < 0.00200
Silver < 0.00200
Tin < 0.00400
Zinc < 0.00600
Lab Sample ID: MB-FIL TER-68854 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared:
Arsenic < 0.00200
Beryllium < 0.00200
Cadmium < 0.000500
Chromium < 0.00200
Cobalt < 0.00400
Copper < 0.00200
Iron < 0.100
Lead < 0.00200
Manganese < 0.00200
Molybdenum < 0.00200
Nickel < 0.00200
Selenium < 0.00200
Silver < 0.00200
Thallium < 0.00200
Tin < 0.00400
Uranium < 0.00200
Zinc < 0.00600
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount Spiked
Units Method MDL Limit
04/07/2020 1330h
04/05/2020 1039h
mg/L E200.8 0.000728 0.00200
mg/L E200.8 0.000508 0.00200
mg/L E200.8 0.000232 0.00200
mg/L E200.8 0.00115 0.00400
mg/L E200.8 0.00418 0.00600
04/07/2020 1343h
04/05/2020 1039h
mg/L E200.8 0.000298 0.00200
mg/L E200.8 0.000198 0.00200
mg/L E200.8 0.0000742 0.000500
mg/L E200.8 0.00191 0.00200
mg/L E200.8 0.000300 0.00400
mg/L E200.8 0.00166 0.00200
mg/L E200 8 0.0328 0.100
mg/L E200,8 0.000448 0.00200
mg/L E200.8 0.000766 0.00200
mg/L E200.8 0.000652 0.00200
mg/L E200.8 0.000728 0.00200
mg/L E200.8 0.000508 0.00200
mg/L E200.8 0.000232 0.00200
mg/L E200.8 0.000390 0.00200
mg/L E200 8 0.00115 0.00400
mg/L E200.8 0.000176 0.00200
mg/L E200.8 0.00418 0.00600
Tanner Holliday
ME
MBLK
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD Ref. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 4/10/2020 Page 12 of26
analyses applicable to the CWA. SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use of ti-
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 2003627
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: MB-FILTER-69023 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared:
Arsenic < 0.00200
Lab Sample ID: MB-69050 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared:
Vanadium < 0.00440
Lab Sample ID: MB-FILTER-68854 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared:
Vanadium < 0.00440
Lab Sample ID: MB-68916 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: HG-DW-DIS-245.1 Date Prepared:
Mercury < 0.0000900
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84 I I 9
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount Spiked
Units Method MDL Limit
04/07/2020 1426h
04/05/2020 1039h
mg/L E200.8 0.000298 0.00200
04/08/2020 1248h
04/05/2020 1039h
mg/L E200.8 0.00152 0.00440
04/08/2020 1308h
04/05/2020 1039h
mg/L E200.8 0.00152 0.00440
03/30/2020 959h
03/27/2020 1335h
mg/L E245.l 0.0000396 0.0000900
Tanner Holliday
ME
MBLK
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Report Date: 4/10/2020 Page 13 of26
analyses applicable to the CWA. SOWA, aod RCRA are perl"onned in accordance to N ELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business lnfonnation: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of tt
ne of this company or any member of its staff~ or reproduction of this report io connection with the advertisement:,. promotion or sale of any product or process~ or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee wi11 be granted only on contact. This
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone] Laboratory Director
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Al>IALYTICAL LABORATORIES ""C SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Lab Set ID: 2003627 Dept: ME
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020 QC Type: MS
Reporting Amount Spiked Spike Ref. RPDRef. RPO
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Amount %REC Limits Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Lab Sample ID: 2003627-00IEMS Date Analyzed: 04/06/2020 1530h
Test Code: 200.7-DIS Date Prepared: 04/05/2020 1039h
Calcium 213 mg/L E200.7 2.11 10.0 100.0 118 94.3 70 -130
Magnesium 137 mg/L E200,7 0.654 10.0 100.0 30.8 106 70 -130
Potassium 110 mg/L E200,7 2.46 10.0 100.0 0 110 70 -130
Sodium 218 mg/L E200.7 1.23 10.0 100.0 117 101 70 -130
Lab Sample ID: 2003627-00IEMS Date Analyzed: 04/07/2020 1615h
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared: 04/05/2020 I 039h
Arsenic 1.95 mg/L E200.8 0.00298 0.0200 2.000 0.00137 97.2 75 -125
Beryllium 2.01 mg/L E200.8 0.00198 0.0200 2.000 0 100 75 -125
Cadmium 1.99 mg/L E200.8 0.000742 0.00500 2.000 0 99.7 75 -125
Chromium 2.01 mg/L E200.8 0.0191 0.0200 2.000 0 101 75 -125
Cobalt 2.06 mg/L E200.8 0.00300 0.0400 2.000 0.000745 103 75 -125
Copper 2.02 mg/L E200.8 0.0166 0.0200 2.000 0 101 75 -125
Iron 10.4 mg/L E200.8 0.328 1.00 10.00 0.401 99.8 75 -125
Lead 1.99 mg/L E200 8 0.00448 0.0200 2.000 0 99.4 75 -125
Manganese 2.31 mg/L E200.8 0.00766 0.0200 2.000 0.369 97.1 75 -125
Molybdenum 2.06 mg/L E200,8 0.00652 0.0200 2.000 0.00177 103 75 -125
Nickel 2.06 mg/L E200.8 0.00728 0.0200 2.000 0 103 75 -125
Selenium 1.91 mg/L E200.8 0.00508 0.0200 2.000 0 95.5 75 -125
Silver 1.97 mg/L E200.8 0.00232 0.0200 2.000 0 98.4 75 -125
Thallium 2.01 mg/L E200.8 0.00390 0.0200 2.000 0 100 75 -125
Tin 10.7 mg/L E200.8 0.0115 0.0400 10.00 0 107 75 -125
Uranium 2.13 mg/L E200.8 0.00176 0.0200 2.000 0.00234 106 75 -125
Vanadium 2.03 mg/L E200.8 0.0152 0.0440 2.000 0 102 75 -125
Zinc 9.88 mg/L E200.8 0.0418 0.0600 10.00 0 98.8 75 -125
Report Date: 4/10/2020 Page 14 of 26
analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accor<lance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use oft~
ne ofthjs company or any member of its staff~ or reprochJction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other-than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 2003627
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Analyte Result Units
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84 I I 9
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Tanner Holliday
Dept: ME
Method MDL
Reporting
Limit
QCType: MS
Amount Spiked Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
Lab Sample ID: 2003627-00IEMS
Test Code: HG-DW-DIS-245.1
Date Analyzed: 03/30/2020 IOI Oh
Date Prepared: 03/27/2020 1335h
Mercury 0.00342 mg/L E245.l 0.0000396 0.0000900 0.003330 0 103
Limits
85 -115
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD Ref. RPD
Limit Amt %RPD Qual
Report Date: 4/10/2020 Page 15 of26
analyses applicable to the CWA, SOWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use oftt
ne of this company or any member of its staff~ or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement promotion or sa1e of any product or process~ or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone] Laboratory Director
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
American West QC SUMMARY REPORT ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Lab Set ID: 2003627 Dept: ME
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020 QC Type: MSD
Reporting Amount Spiked Spike Ref. RPD Ref. RPD
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Amount %REC Limits Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Lab Sample ID: 2003627-00IEMSD Date Analyzed: 04/06/2020 1533h
Test Code: 200.7-DIS Date Prepared: 04/05/2020 1039h
Calcium 201 mg/L E200.7 2.11 10.0 100.0 118 83.0 70 -130 213 5.45 20
Magnesium 130 mg/L E200.7 0.654 10.0 100.0 30.8 99.6 70 -130 137 4.71 20
Potassium 110 mg/L E200 7 2.46 10.0 100.0 0 110 70 -130 110 0.124 20
Sodium 207 mg/L E200.7 1.23 10.0 100.0 117 89.4 70 -130 218 5.34 20
Lab Sample ID: 2003627-00IEMSD Date Analyzed: 04/07/2020 1618h
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared: 04/05/2020 1039h
Arsenic 1.96 mg/L E200,8 0.00298 0.0200 2.000 0.00137 98.1 75 -125 1.95 0.944 20
Beryllium 2.03 mg/L E200.8 0.00198 0.0200 2.000 0 IOI 75 -125 2.01 1.16 20
Cadmium 1.99 mg/L E200,8 0.000742 0.00500 2.000 0 99.7 75 -125 1.99 0.0411 20
Chromium 1.99 mg/L E200.8 0.0191 0.0200 2.000 0 99.6 75 -125 2.01 0.888 20
Cobalt 2.05 mg/L E200.8 0.00300 0.0400 2.000 0.000745 102 75 -125 2.06 0.395 20
Copper 2.03 mg/L E200.8 0.0166 0.0200 2.000 0 101 75 -125 2.02 0.142 20
Iron 10.3 mg/L E200.8 0.328 1.00 10.00 0.401 99.3 75 -125 10.4 0.458 20
Lead 2.02 mg/L E200.8 0.00448 0.0200 2.000 0 101 75 -125 1.99 1.42 20
Manganese 2.34 mg/L E200.8 0.00766 0.0200 2.000 0.369 98.6 75 -125 2.31 1.32 20
Molybdenum 2.03 mg/L E200.8 0.00652 0.0200 2.000 0.00177 101 75 -125 2.06 1.81 20
Nickel 2.04 mg/L E200.8 0.00728 0.0200 2.000 0 102 75 -125 2.06 0.979 20
Selenium 1.90 mg/L E200,8 0.00508 0.0200 2.000 0 95.1 75 -125 1.91 0.415 20
Silver 1.98 mg/L E200.8 0.00232 0.0200 2.000 0 99.1 75 -125 1.97 0.797 20
Thallium 1.98 mg/L E200.8 0.00390 0.0200 2.000 0 99.0 75 -125 2.01 1.45 20
Tin 10.3 mg/L E200.8 0.0115 0.0400 10.00 0 103 75 -125 10.7 4.09 20
Uranium 2.16 mg/L E200 8 0.00176 0.0200 2.000 0.00234 108 75 -125 2.13 1.40 20
Vanadium 2.03 mg/L E200,8 0.0152 0.0440 2.000 0 102 75 -125 2.03 0.00256 20
Zinc 9.99 mg/L E200.8 0.0418 0.0600 10.00 0 99.9 75 -125 9.88 1.09 20
Report Date: 4/10/2020 Page 16 of26
analyses applicable to the CWA, SOWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols, Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: TI1is report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of ti-
ne of this company or any member of its staff~ or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sa1e of any product or process. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any pwpose other than for the addressee wi11 be granted only on contact This
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 2003627
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Analyte Result Units
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
Tanner Holliday
ME
Method MDL
Reporting
Limit
QC Type: MSD
Amount Spiked Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
Lab Sample ID: 2003627-00IEMSD
Test Code: HG-DW-DIS-245.l
Date Analyzed: 03/30/2020 1012h
Date Prepared: 03/27/2020 1335h
Mercury 0.00342 mg/L E245.l 0.0000396 0.0000900 0.003330 0 103
Limits
85 -115
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef.
Amt %RPO
0.00342 0.0487
RPD
Limit
20
Qual
Report Date: 4/10/2020 Page 17 of26
analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This repon is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of ti-
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, oc in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only oo conlaet. This
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 2003627
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: 2003627-001 CDUP Date Analyzed:
Test Code: TDS-W-2540C
Total Dissolved Solids 1,070
Units
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount Spiked
Method MDL Limit
Tanner Holliday
WC
DUP
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
03/30/2020 1140h
mg/L SM2540C 16.0 20.0
@ -High RPD due to suspected sample non-homogeneity or matrix interference.
Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt %RPO Limit
1200 11.3 5
Qual
@
Report Date: 4/10/2020 Page 18 of26
analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of ti-
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisemenl promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 2003627
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Analyte Result Units
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: (80 I) 263-8686, Toll Free: ( 888) 263-8686, Fax: ( 801) 263-8687
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
_QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Tanner Holliday
Dept: WC
Method MDL
Reporting
Limit
QCType: LCS
Amount Spiked Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
Lab Sample ID: LCS-Rl37196 Date Analyzed: 03/31/2020 2344h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride
Fluoride
Sulfate
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R137118
Test Code: ALK-W-2320B-LL
Alkalinity (as CaC03)
Lab Sample ID: LCS-68969
Test Code: NH3-W-350.l
Ammonia (as N)
Lab Sample ID: LCS-Rl37224
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N)
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R137131
Test Code: TDS-W-2540C
Total Dissolved Solids
5.12 mg/L E300.0
5.09 mg/L E300,0
5.05 mg/L E300.0
Date Analyzed: 03/31/2020 729h
250 mg/L SM2320B
Date Analyzed: 04/02/2020 1441h
Date Prepared: 04/01/2020 846h
1.85 mg/L E350.l -Date Analyzed: 04/02/2020 1022h
1.10 mg/L E353,2
Date Analyzed: 03/30/2020 1140h
208 mg/L SM2540C
0.0565 0.100
0.0240 0.100
0.136 0.750
0.369 1.00
0.0473 0.0500
0.00494 0.0100
8.00 10.0
5.000
5.000
5.000
250.0
2.000
1.000
205.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
102
102
101
100
92.4
llO
IOI
Limits
90 -110
90 -110
90 -110
90 -110
90 -110
90 -110
80 -120
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Limit Amt %RPO Qual
Report Date: 4/1 0/2020 Page 19 of 26
analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NE LAC protocols Pertinent sampling infom1ation is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use of ti-
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee wil1 be granted only on contact. This
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 2003627
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: MB-R137196 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride < 0.100
Fluoride <0.100
Sulfate < 0.750
Lab Sample ID: MB-RI37118 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: ALK-W-23208-LL
Bicarbonate (as CaC03) < 1.00
Carbonate (as CaC03) < 1.00
Lab Sample ID: MB-68969 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: NH3-W-350.l Date Prepared:
Ammonia (as N) < 0.0500
Lab Sample ID: MB-R137224 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) < 0.0100
Lab Sample ID: MB-R137131 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: TDS-W-2540C
Total Dissolved Solids < 10.0
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount Spiked
Units Method MDL Limit
03/31/2020 2327h
mg/L E300.0 0.0565 0.100
mg/L E300.0 0.0240 0.100
mg/L E300.0 0.136 0.750
03/31/2020 729h
mg/L SM2320B 0.369 1.00
mg/L SM2320B 0.369 1.00
04/02/2020 1408h
04/01/2020 846h
mg/L E350.l 0.0473 0.0500
04/02/2020 1021h
mg/L E353.2 0.00494 0.0100
03/30/2020 1140h
mg/L SM2540C 8.00 10.0
Tanner Holliday
WC
MBLK
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPO
Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Report Date: 4/10/2020 Page 20 of 26
analyses applicable to the CWA. SOW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NE LAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of ti-
ne of this company or any member of its staff, oc reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement promotion or sa1e of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contacL This
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 2003627
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: 2003627-00IBMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 273
Fluoride 256
Sulfate 544
Lab Sample ID: 2003627-00lBMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: ALK-W-2320B-LL
Alkalinity (as CaC03) 366
Lab Sample ID: 2003627-00IDMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: NH3-W-350.l Date Prepared:
Ammonia (as N) 1.73
Lab Sample ID: 2003627-00IDMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.08
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount Spiked
Units Method MDL Limit
04/01/2020 749h
mg/L E300.0 2.82 5.00 250.0
mg/L E300.0 1.20 5.00 250.0
mg/L E300.0 6.80 37.5 250.0
03/31/2020 729h
mg/L SM23208 0.369 1.00 100.0
04/02/2020 1432h
04/01/2020 846h
mg/L E350.1 0.0473 0.0500 2.000
04/02/2020 1029h
mg/L E353.2 0.00494 0.0100 1.000
Tanner Holliday
WC
MS
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
26.6 98.4
0.555 102
307 94.5
270 96.0
0.0593 83.6
0.00555 107
1 -Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
Limits
90 -110
90 -110
90 -110
80 -120
90 -110
90 -110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPO Ref. RPO
Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 4/10/2020 Page 21 of26
analyses applicable to the CWA. SOWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business lnfomiation: T11is report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of ti-
ne of this company or any member of its staff. or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement,. promotion or sa1e of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any pwpose other than for the addressee wi11 be granted only on contact. This
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84 I I 9 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone] Laboratory Director
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Jose Rocha
American West
QA Officer
_QC SUMMARY REPORT ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Lab Set ID: 2003627 Dept: WC
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020 QC Type: MSD
Reporting Amount Spiked Spike Ref. RPD Ref. RPD
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Amount %REC Limits Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Lab Sample ID: 2003627-00IBMSD Date Analyzed: 04/01/2020 806h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 277 mg/L E300 0 2.82 5.00 250.0 26.6 100 90 -110 273 1.52 20
Fluoride 257 mg/L E300.0 1.20 5.00 250.0 0.555 103 90 -110 256 0.348 20
Sulfate 549 mg/L E300.0 6.80 37.5 250.0 307 96.9 90 -110 544 1.08 20
Lab Sample ID: 2003627-00IBMSD Date Analyzed: 03/31/2020 729h
Test Code: ALK-W-23208-LL
Alkalinity (as CaC03) 366 mg/L SM2320B 0.369 1.00 100.0 270 96.0 80 -120 366 0 10
Lab Sample ID: 2003627-00IDMSD Date Analyzed: 04/02/2020 1433h
Test Code: NH3-W-350.l Date Prepared: 04/01/2020 846h
Ammonia (as N) 1.42 mg/L E350.1 0.0473 0.0500 2.000 0.0593 67.8 90-110 1.73 20.0 IO '@
Lab Sample ID: 2003627-00IDMSD Date Analyzed: 04/02/2020 1030h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.03 mg/L E353.2 0.00494 0.0100 1.000 0.00555 102 90 -110 1.08 5.23 10
@ -High RPD due to suspected sample non-homogeneity or matrix interference.
' -Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
Report Date: 4/10/2020 Page 22 of26
analyses applicable to the CWA. SOWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This repon is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use oft~
ne of this company or any member of its staff~ or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement promotion or sa1e of any product or process~ or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any pwpose othcr than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 2003627
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: LCS VOC-1 0327208 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 8260D-W-DENIOO
2-Butanone 27.9
Acetone 37.5
Benzene 18.7
Carbon tetrachloride 18.8
Chloroform 19.5
Chloromethane 9.51
Methylene chloride 19.0
Naphthalene 18.3
Tetrahydrofuran 19.2
Toluene 18.0
Xylenes, Total 54.9
Surr: l ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 50.0
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 47.0
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 48.5
Surr: Toluene-d8 47.5
Units
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
_QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount Spiked
Method MDL Limit
Tanner Holliday
MSVOA
LCS
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
03/27/2020 1259h
µg/L SW82600 1.22 20.0 20.00 0 139
µg/L SW82600 2.76 20.0 20.00 0 188
µg/L SW8260D 0.147 1.00 20.00 0 93.7
µg/L SW82600 0.859 1.00 20.00 0 93 .8
µg/L SW82600 0.166 1.00 20.00 0 97.6
µg/L SW8260D 0.802 1.00 20.00 0 47.6
µg/L SW8260D 0.381 1.00 20.00 0 95.2
µg/L SW8260D 0.704 1.00 20.00 0 91.7
µg/L SW8260D 0.436 1.00 20.00 0 96.2
µg/L SW8260D 0.285 1.00 20.00 0 90.0
µg/L SW8260D 0.575 1.00 60.00 0 91.5
µg/L SW8260D 50.00 100
µg/L SW8260D 50.00 94.0
µg/L SW8260D 50.00 97.l
µg/L SW8260D 50.00 94.9
Limits
74 -236
70 -350
80 -127
66 -143
85 -124
30 -149
65 -154
55 -128
59 -135
69 -129
66 -124
80 -136
85 -121
78 -132
81 -123
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD Ref. RPD
Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Report Date: 4/10/2020 Page 23 of 26
analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA ar-c perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of tt
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This
American West ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 2003627
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: MB VOC-1 032720B Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 82600-W-DENlOO
2-Butanone <20.0
Acetone <20.0
Benzene < 1.00
Carbon tetrachloride < 1.00
Chloroform < 1.00
Chloromethane < 1.00
Methylene chloride < 1.00
Naphthalene < 1.00
Tetrah ydrofuran < 1.00
Toluene < 1.00
Xylenes, Total < 1.00
Surr: l ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 52.2
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 50.6
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 48.7
Surr: Toluene-d8 49.3
Units
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 841 I 9
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount Spiked
Method MDL Limit
Tanner Holliday
MSVOA
MBLK
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
03/27/2020 1319h
µg/L SW8260D 1.22 20.0
µg/L SW8260D 2.76 20.0
µg/L SW8260D 0.147 1.00
µg/L SW8260D 0.859 1.00
µg/L SW8260D 0.166 1.00
µg/L SW8260D 0.802 1.00
µg/L SW8260D 0.381 1.00
µg/L SW8260D 0.704 1.00
µg/L SW8260D 0.436 1.00
µg/L SW8260D 0.285 1.00
µg/L SW8260D 0.575 1.00
µg/L SW8260D 50.00 104
µg/L SW8260D 50.00 101
µg/L SW8260D 50.00 97.4
µg/L SW8260D 50.00 98.6
Limits
80 -136
85 -121
78 -132
81 -123
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Report Date: 4/10/2020 Page 24 of 26
analyses applicable to the CWA. SOWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infom1ation is located on the attached COC Confidential Business Information: TI1is report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use oftt
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement., promotion or saJe of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any pwpose other than for the addressee wi11 be granted only on contact. This
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 2003627
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: 2003627-00IAMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 8260D-W-DEN100
2-Butanone 21.3
Acetone 18.4
Benzene 18.6
Carbon tetrachloride 18.7
Chloroform 19.2
Chloromethane 10.2
Methylene chloride 19.1
Naphthalene 17.2
Tetrahydrofuran 18.7
Toluene 17.9
Xylenes, Total 53.9
Surr: l ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 51.0
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 47.9
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 48.3
Surr: Toluene-d8 48.0
Units
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount Spiked
Method MDL Limit
Tanner Holliday
MSVOA
MS
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
03/27/2020 1438h
µg/L SW8260D 1.22 20.0 20.00 0 106
µg/L SW8260D 2.76 20.0 20.00 0 92.2
µg/L SW8260D 0.147 1.00 20.00 0 93.2
µg/L SW8260D 0.859 1.00 20.00 0 93.3
µg/L SW8260D 0.166 1.00 20.00 0 96.1
µg/L SW8260D 0.802 1.00 20.00 0 51.2
µg/L SW8260D 0.381 1.00 20.00 0 95.6
µg/L SW8260D 0.704 1.00 20.00 0 86.1
µg/L SW8260D 0.436 1.00 20.00 0 93.4
µg/L SW8260D 0.285 1.00 20.00 0 89.4
µg/L SW8260D 0.575 1.00 60.00 0 89.9
µg/L SW8260D 50.00 102
µg/L SW8260D 50.00 95.9
µg/L SW8260D 50.00 96.6
µg/L SW8260D 50.00 96.1
Limits
74 -236
70 -350
80 -127
66 -143
85 -124
30 -149
65 -154
55 -128
59 -135
69 -129
66 -124
80 -136
85 -121
78 -132
81 -123
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Report Date: 4/10/2020 Page 25 of26
analyses applicable to the CW A. SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business lnfonnation: TI1is report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use oftJ-
ne of this company or any member of its staff~ or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement,. promotion or sa1e of any product or process~ or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee wi11 be granted only on contact. This
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone] Laboratory Director
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
American West _QC SUMMARY REPORT ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Lab Set ID: 2003627 Dept: MSVOA
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020 QC Type: MSD
--
Reporting Amount Spiked Spike Ref. RPDRef. RPO
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Amount %REC Limits Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Lab Sample ID: 2003627-00IAMSD Date Analyzed: 03/27/2020 1458h
Test Code: 8260D-W-DENIOO
2-Butanone 25.0 µg/L SW8260D 1.22 20.0 20.00 0 125 74 -236 21.3 16.2 35
Acetone 21.2 µg/L SW8260D 2.76 20.0 20.00 0 106 70 -350 18.4 13.9 35
Benzene 21.3 µg/L SW8260D 0.147 1.00 20.00 0 106 80 -127 18.6 13.4 35
Carbon tetrachloride 21.6 µg/L SW8260D 0.859 1.00 20.00 0 108 66 -143 18.7 14.6 35
Chloroform 21.4 µg/L SW8260D 0.166 1.00 20.00 0 107 85 -124 19.2 10.5 35
Chloromethane 11.3 µg/L SW8260D 0.802 1.00 20.00 0 56.6 30 -149 10.2 IO.I 35
Methylene chloride 22.1 µg/L SW8260D 0.381 1.00 20.00 0 110 65 -154 19.1 14.3 35
Naphthalene 20.2 µg/L SW8260D 0.704 1.00 20.00 0 101 55 -128 17.2 15.7 35
Tetrahydrofuran 22.3 µg/L SW8260D 0.436 1.00 20.00 0 112 59 -135 18.7 17.7 35
Toluene 20.5 µg/L SW8260D 0.285 1.00 20.00 0 102 69 -129 17.9 13.5 35
Xylenes, Total 61.4 µg/L SW8260D 0.575 1.00 60.00 0 102 66-124 53.9 13.0 35
Surr: l,2-Dichloroethane-d4 51.9 µg/L SW8260D 50.00 104 80 -136
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 48.8 µg/L SW8260D 50.00 97.7 85 -121
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 49.5 µg/L SW8260D 50.00 99.0 78 -132
Surr: Toluene-d8 48.5 µg/L SW8260D 50.00 96.9 81 -123
Report Date: 4/10/2020 Page 26 of26
analyses apphcable to the CW A. SOW A. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent~ of tt
ne of this company or any member of its staff~ or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact, This
American West Analytical Laboratories Rpt Emailed: UL
Denison
WORK ORDER Summary WorkOrder: 2003627
Due Date: 4/10/2020
Page I of I
Client:
Client ID:
Project:
Comments:
Sample ID
2003627-00IA
2003627-001 B
2003627-00IC
2003627-00ID
2003627-00IE
2003627-002A
Printed: 03/27 /20 12:45
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
ENE300 Contact: Tanner Holliday
Annual Seeps & Springs 2020 QC Level: III WO Type: Project
QC 3 (no chromatograms). EDD-Denison. CC [e-mail]; Samples were field filtered for metals; ~
Client Sample ID Collected Date
Westwater Spring 3/25/2020 1300h
Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
3/27/2020 1100h 82600-W-DENIOO Aqueous [;,J VOCFridge
____ Te~t_G!:_oup: 8260D:_W-DENJOO; _# of. Analytes: l_lj__#_ o/~ur!.~_4__ .. ·-
300.0-W [v'J df -WC
_., ·----3 SEL Analyre.s: CL F S04
ALK-W-23208-LL [,jj df-wc
-· ·----·-··----·----·--·-____ -·· -·---_ _2SELAnalytes:ALKBALKC
---------·· .. --. -
---·-----4 ----------. ____ ,,_ __ .. ·-----
---·---------
TDS-W-2540C ~] df-tds
______ I SELAnalyie.s: TDS
NHJ-W-350.1
_____ I Sf}L An<!!J.tes:!jH3N_
NH3-W-PR
·-------------·---.
N02/N03-W-353.2
___ _ _ I 8_EL Anatytes: NC?_3N02!:f __ _
200.7-DIS
-------·-__ 4.SEL Analyt~: CA ~G_§._N_'.4 _______ _
200.7-DIS-PR ------------------200.8-DIS
J;;,J df -no2/no3 & nh3
~~-no:f_n~nh3
r;,1 df -no2/no3 & nh3
J,tJ df-met
~
J,tj
df-met
df-met
18 SEL Analytes: AS BE CD CR CO CU FE PB MN MO NI SE AG
TLSNUVZN
200.8-DIS-PR ----·--·-·--. ----··---·-----
HG-DW-DIS-245.1
··-·-___ J,;,L
[~j
df-met
df-met
---------· .. --. _ -------·----------__ .. ____ . ______ ISEL Analyte.s:HG _______ _
___ ----· ___ -----·---·--•·---------· ---·-·-· -· .. HG-OW-DIS-PR -·-··-.. _______________ ['ll] df-met
IONBALANCE J..tJ df-met
5 S§J:.1..'!!!/;:(es: 1!._A_L_ANCE Anions_ Cations TDS-Jla'EFI!!!. '!!l_S:..Cal~
Trip Blank 3/25/2020 1300h 3/27/2020 1100h 8260D-W-DEN100 Aqueous [;,] VOCFridge
7:est_~'21Uf:..f!J_60D-W-Df!!'!_IO~;_#~f A_n_qq;tes: 111# of ~u:;: 4
LABORATORY CHECK: %M [] RT [l CN O TAT[] QC [J LUO[] HOK ___ HOK __ _ HOK___ COC Emailed~----
3
3
5
8
'
10 )
I
!
Address:
Contact:
Phone#:
Email:
Project Name:
Project#:
PO#:
Sampler Name:
Westwater Spring
Trip Blank
American West
Analytical Laboratories
463 W. 3600 S. Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone# [phone] Toll Free# [phone]
6425 S. Hwy. 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Tanner Holliday
(4351678-2221 Cell#:
[e-mail]; [e-mail];
tholllda!J!l!ne!lllfuels.com
Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Tanner Holliday
Date
Samele ID: Samoled
I
3/25/2020
3/25/2020
Date: Rel!llqlJlslled by.~. $lnl\3!Urn '-,I ~ r> A ~././£_/ = C,/ mme:
"ml Name: Tanner Hol~-· 110C
Retnqulshed by. Dale:
~ ........ _
Time:
"""'Narno:
Roltlquisned by: Date:
"""natU'e Tim&:
Ptlnl Name:
Relmqulshed by. ,.,,,,_ Dale:
Time:
Pl1n1Name:
Time
Sampled
1300
1300
Rec,,l\oedby.
Si<lnahlre
Print N""'e:
Received by:
Si<lnanre
Print Name:
Received by:
lslQnature
Print Name:
Received by:
!~nature
Print Name:
I
-........
CHAIN OF CUSTQDY
All analysis will be conducted using NELAP accredited met:,ods and all data will be reported using AWAL's standard analyte lls!S and
reporting limits (POL) unless specifically requested otherwise on tt,is Chain of Custody and/or attached documentaUon.
QC Level: I Tum Around Time: Unless other arrangements have been made,
signed repor1s wil be emailed by 5;00 pm on
3 Standard Ille day they an, duo.
X Include EDD: 0 LOCUS UPLOAD ;:;; as u EXCEL bD bD X Reid FIitered For: ..... :i:: ;:;; Diasolved Metals .... cl' lti ;:;; :,,:·
'I" C'I .0 as· ~ 0.. z For Compliance With:
c:i Cl) ~-0 NELAP
0 i:t. 0 RCRA o' C'I >" c:i ~ ::i 0 CWA
0 c:i u ::i 0 SDWA ..... "' 0 0 ELAP/A2LA .... w 0 c:i ... t'!. C) ci' 0 0 NLLAP IJ) rn ~ 0 ~ .. ,: 0 Non-Compliance "' 0 iii C) ¢ ~ ... IJ) t'!. ... 0 Other: 0 :t. GI 'd. i D' II! ~ c:, D' '5 :El u i 0 " f 0 ""' 0 \0 i:: (I) 0 i ;,:; .!:! 'II Cl) Cl) C'I ]j "' 0 IJ) GI co rn ~ i:: ::;; Ii!; :t. t'!. Ill .e Known Hazards 0 ~ -cf -0 "' i Ill • u a. Ci I Ill '5 • < 0 & 0 E 0 &: ~ • R g .. 2: {,) iS 0 Samole Comments .. Cl) ...
7 w X X X X X X X X X X
3 w X
J..bo3LRd:7
AWAL Lab Sample Set#
Page 1 of 1
Due Date:
4 \tb \1t>
Laboratory Use Only
Samples Were: ~
:~•\>''
3 Temperature ;).. Q •c
4 Recelvedv (Im property '
y
5~N
~;~ c;ngTI-N
Ir.cc Tape Was:
1 Present z::;, Pacl<.lge
Y N NA
2 Unbroken on OUter!"~
Y N NA
3 PresentonB Y N NA
4 Unbroken on Sample A
Y N NA -Discrepancies Between Sample
y N abels and COC R~
.:::..,,r~-~< ./, Dal',~ ,I 3-0 Special Instructions:
.J~ n4"1("".{(. 1-, +" ., .. e, \\.00 Sample containers for metals were field filtered. See the Date: Analytical Scope of Work for Reporting Limits and voe analyte
rnme: list.
Date:
·nme:
Date:
nme:
Analysis
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
N02/N03
O&G
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TP04
CrVI+
Procedure:
Frequency:
Preservation Check Sheet
s am le SetE Pl
Preservative \
pH<2H2S04 "~ oH<2H2S04
oH>l2NaOH
pH<2HN03 " "'"' oH<2H2S04 '{ t<:.
pH<2HCL
oH<2H2S04
pH>9NaOH,
Zn Acetate
pH<2 H2S04
oH<2 H2S04
pH>9
(NH4)2S04
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
d pH .
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
If sample is not preserved, properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag COC, notify client if requested
Place client conversation on COC
Samples may be adjusted
All samples requiring preservation
*
+
•
#
•
The sample required additional preservative upon receipt.
The sample was received unpreserved.
The sample was received unpreserved and therefore preserved upon receipt.
The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH < 2 due to the sample matrix.
The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH> __ due to the sample matrix interference .
Lab Set ID:
pH Lot#:
~oc3ud-1
u,li ~
le;t ~ I I Laboratories LLc
a member of The GEL Group INC
PO Bo,30712 Cha~eston.SC29417
2040 Sa•1age Road Cha~eston. SC 29407
P 843 556.8171
F 8437661178
April 14, 2020
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Re: Analytical for Annual Seeps and Spring 2020
Work Order: 508151
Dear Ms. Weinel:
GEL Laboratories, LLC (GEL) appreciates the opportunity to provide the enclosed analytical results for the
sample(s) we received on March 31, 2020. This original data report has been prepared and reviewed in
accordance with GEL's standard operating procedures.
Test results for NELAP or ISO 17025 accredited tests are verified to meet the requirements of those standards,
with any exceptions noted. The results reported relate only to the items tested and to the sample as received by
the laboratory. These results may not be reproduced except as full reports without approval by the laboratory.
Copies of GEL' s accreditations and certifications can be found on our website at www .gel.com.
Our policy is to provide high quality, personalized analytical services to enable you to meet your analytical needs
on time every time. We trust that you will find everything in order and to your satisfaction. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 4289.
Purchase Order: DW16138
Enclosures
Sincerely,
~ j,tJ
Samuel Hogan for
Julie Robinson
Project Manager
ilH UHlll 1111111111111111 U II
gel.com
Page 2 of 13 SDG: 508151
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Analytical for
SDG: 508151
April 14, 2020
Laboratory Identification:
GEL Laboratories LLC
2040 Savage Road
Charleston, South Carolina 29407
[phone]
Summary:
Receipt Narrative
for
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
SDG: 508151
Sam pie receipt: The sample arrived at GEL Laboratories LLC, Charleston, South Carolina on March 31, 2020
for analysis. The sample was delivered with proper chain of custody documentation and signatures. All sample
containers arrived without any visible signs of tampering or breakage. There are no additional comments
concerning sample receipt.
Sample Identification: The laboratory received the following sample:
Laboratory ID Client ID
508151001 Westwater Spring
Case Narrative:
Sample analyses were conducted using methodology as outlined in GEL's Standard Operating Procedures. Any
technical or administrative problems during analysis, data review, and reduction are contained in the analytical
case narratives in the enclosed data package.
The enclosed data package contains the following sections: Case Narrative, Chain of Custody, Cooler Receipt
Checklist, Data Package Qualifier Definitions and data from the following fractions: Radiochemistry.
Page 3 of 13 SDG: 508151
~~
Samuel Hogan for
Julie Robinson
Project Manager
~-/~~~
s:;;i-,;NERGYFUELS RESOURCES
Sheet 1 of 1
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Samples Shipped to: GEL Laboratories, LLC Contact: Tanner Holliday -2-04_0__,...S-av_a_g_e_R_o_a_d________ Ph : 435 678 2221
Charleston, SC 29407 [e-mail]
[phone]
Chain of Custody/Sampling Analysis Request
p . t roJec s amp1ers N ame s amp1ers s· t 1gna ure
Annual Seeps & Springs L-· )r,\ A 11 iJ ...-)/~/-,/ 2020 Tanner Holliday
/
Time
Sample ID Date Collected Collected Laboratory Analysis Requested
Westwater Spring 3/25/2020 1300 Gross Alpha
Comments: Please send report to Kathv Weinel at [e-mail]
Relinquished By:(Signature)
Page 4 of 13 SDG: 508151
Date/Time Received By:(Signature)
3/26/2020
1100
~ i l ,:n'.~a:o:;e:). ;; r& SI ... MPfL.~ t~!ECE.tPT _&_l_l_£_v_r_E_~_;_-t_·~-R_M_1~~-~-"--':....!=-_ ....;'l)__;(.....;.;;;....:...._;......:.=:....·-:..;.~-~i_l'._i~'.·
~'.fcn,:.--......,.--..l ... D. .... W.....,.W.~:i;____-_ --. _·_· -·~}.l~C?0;;,?::~~-. 1 · ·' ... . . .: ~ .... ::·~ • :'._":' _I
f, I , i"': ' 1 • I
1'! ·,;·•1;
R~cciv ~ti lly: _ P.al•! ~~ 3' §_lp.i_.....:_...:..;.:.....;....:......:.. __ -'·;_,_·_--....:.-"--..:.......;;c.....: __ =·'-:-', -· :...;.:._' ;.:;· '.;..........;-=---1
-* • .. -• Cir.::k~..ibk: f
Fcdtx Express l'cdEx Ground & l'icld Services Courier Other
17-ttt'f Ylf.YtJ;·f%.z <i5tf7 Cn~rlcr nr,:: Tniclling Number ! , ., 1----------------------1-------·--··· _._ ________ .:.....;:....._ ...... _.....::..... __ .....:;.::. __ ..;.;..__;:,.:_...:.._~::,:c=.....:::........::---1
S11s11ec1cd Mn>.ard. lnfo,·nrn1ion ;. I_ • If Net Cn1111s > •. ! OOcp,n on-samples not nrnrkcd "rndionc1ive''.'cci1i1act ilii: Radintio11 Safety Group fclr h,rihcr i11vc':;li!falion. 1-----------------+--,-,--+----·-·---------------·---·--....:..-----=----'-· ... i.. ---.
,\JShi111ed as a DOT Hnz~rdous'!
B) Did the clicnl desib~1.nlc the samples arc 10 be
roccivc<l as r.adivacti ve''
C) Did the RSO classify the samples as
'"' rndioncrivc'f
D) Did the client designate samples nre
hn'1,1rdous'!
EJ Diu ihc RSO ide111/fv ossiblc hn1.nrds'/
S11m11I" Ucccipt Crllcrln
Shipping containers received i111acl and
sealed?
2 Chain or custody documents included
with shipm.c_•1_ll_? _________ -+·
3 Samples requiring cold preservation
within (0 :: 6 deg. C)?•
'
Dnil); check performed and passed on IR 4 t~mpernture gun?
5 S0111plc containers intact a,;d scaled'!
Sump cs rcquirfng chemical pri:~cn~ntion ~ 111 ,,roper pH?
Do uny snmples require Volniilc
Analysis?
E S,11nplcs recciwd within holding lime?
9 Sample ID's on COC match ID's on
boltles'?
10 Dale & lime on COC match date &,iime
oi1 llonles~
11 N uml>.:r of conrainers received nm1ch
number indicated on COC''
12 A're smnpl.: containers identifiable as ·
C:E r v' l•t!·•
13 COC form is properly signed in
n:linquishcd/roccivcd scc1ions'!
Commcil\s ( Use Co11ti111m1io11 l'onn if needed):
Hn,.,rd Class Shi11ptd: UN#:
If UN2910, I~ the Radioncti1·0 Shi11111ent Sun·cy Cnmpl ant? ,Yes_ .No_
COC notation or rndio3crivc :slickers on contafoc.rs c'qiml clic'nr dcs t1nntio11.
Masi,mun Net Counts Observed• (Obsen•ed Counts• /\rcn llackgro1111d Counls): ~cr~l / mRll·f r
Clr.ssifkd ns: a.ml I R:ui 2 Rntl J . 1 •
COC' notnt/on nr ha111rd ln\,eis 011 cnmainers cqunt clic0n1 dl!Signntioi'r.
l'lammablc foreign Soil RCR;\ Asbestos llcrylli11111 01her:
Commenrs/Quali,liers (ncr1uirct1 for Non-Conforn.1ing Items): rirclc ,lpplicablc: Lcaki11y contoiner. Other (describe)
'Chclc Applicublo:: Client co11tnctcd nnd prO\'ideJ C.'OC COC:'e1co1cd """" rocclp1
l'rcservaiimi;\.lctl!od:We, It: Ice Packs· . Dry ice No11c Other:
fall tcmpcrn1urcs arc recorded in Celsius
'l'cm11crnh1re Dc,ice Serfn"iil:_.,o.;..J!;l.:"j...;.:::.ld:2..
Secondary Temperature De1·ice Serial Ji (If Applicable):
Circ.lt: Ap1;!ic!1hlc:: Sc,,ls hrot.:,m O.inuiscd conuuncr Lt:aking co1uai,1cr Other (dderiUC)
S:unptt lD's 3nd Cont;tincrs .-\tTcc1cd·
. '~
·, -~ .. •
~_J
·~
I Do liquid VO,\ \·ials ~1.11nin acid prc,ervatio11?:Ycs_ .'lo...:_ NA,.._(frunknown. select ~ol 1
.-\re liquid VOA vinl.< fre~ ofh•;ads1111ce0 Ye.,_ No __ , NA_ · :
Smnplt;! Ill's .1nd co111m11crs affl!cl~d ~· I
!O's nnd tcsrs nffoc1c.l:
IO's and contniilcr~ ~t'fc~1cd·-:------------------------'--.;._. ---.-.
Circhl A11plic,1ble: No dates Oil contniilcrs No limes on c0111ni11c1~ COC 111issi11~ in lo. Otl,cr (describe)
' . ,.1
Crrctc Applic,,blc: No co111aiilcr coun1 Oil COC 01hcr (describe)
Circle :\ppl!callk Nfll dinc1uishcd 01he1.'(dcscribc) .. ,
PM (or PMA) review: Initials .~. _____ Date -· -·· Page J_ ol' -~-GL-CHL-SR-001 Rev 6
Page 5 of 13 SDG: 508151
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
GEL Work Order/SDG: 508151
Client SDG: 508151
Annual Seeps and Spring 2020
Project Manager:
Project Name:
Purchase Order:
Package Level:
EDD Format:
Julie Robinson
DNMI00106 Analytical for
DW16138
LEVEL3
EIM_DNMI
GELID Client Sample ID Client Sample Desc.
Collect
Date& Time
Work Order Due Date: 27-APR-20
Package Due Date:
EDD Due Date:
QA Due Date:
IAQJ!I Date:
Receive Time # of
Date & Time Zone Cont.
25-APR-20
27-APR-20
27-APR-20
28-APR-20
Lab
Matrix
Report Date: 14-APR-20
Work Order:508151
Page 1 of 2
Collector: C
Prelogin #: 20190486669
Project Workdef ID: 1329132
SDG Status: Closed
Logged by:
Fax Days to
Due Date Process CofC#
Prelog Lab Field
Group QC QC
508151001 Westwater Spring 25-MAR-20 13:00 31-MAR-20 10:45 -2 GROUND WATER 19
Client Sample ID
-001 Westwater Spring
Status Tests/Methods
REVW GFPC, Total Alpha Radium,
Liquid
Product
Reference
Gross Alpha
Fax Date PM Comments Aux Data
Product: GFCTORAL Workdef ID: 1461303 In Product Group? No Group Name: Group Reference:
Method: EPA 903.0
Product Description: GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid
Samples: 001
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS#
Contingent
Tests
Parmname
Gross Radium Alpha
Action Product Name
Login Requirements:
Requirement
Description
Path: Drinking Water (903.0 or 9315)
Product Reference: Gross Alpha
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Client RDL or
PQL& Unit
Reporting Parm Included Included Custom
Units Function in Sample? in QC? List?
pCi/L REG y y No
Samples
Include? Comments
Receive
Codes
......
lf) ......
00 0
lf)
c:,
Cl r./)
(")
'+-< 0
\0
~ ~ 0....
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
Peer Review by: ____________ _ Work Order (SDG#), PO# Checked? ____ _
Report Date: 14-APR-20
Work Order: 508151
Page 2 of 2
C of C signed in receiver location? _____ _
......
V) ......
00 0
V)
0 0 rJJ.
("<") ......
(+-,
0
t"--
(1) ~ ~
List of current GEL Certifications as of 14 April 2020
State Certification
Alaska 17-018
Alaska Drinking Water SC00012
Arkansas 88-0651
CUA 4200904046
California 2940
Colorado SC00012
Connecticut PH-0169
DoD ELAP/ ISOl 7025 A2LA 2567.01
Florida NELAP E87156
Foreign Soils Permit P330-15-00283,P330-15-00253
Georgia SC00012
Georgia SOWA 967
Hawaii SCOOOJ2
Idaho SCOOOJ2
Illinois NELAP 200029
Indiana C-SC-01
Kansas NELAP E-10332
Kentucky SOWA 90129
Kentucky Wastewater 90129
Louisiana Drinking Water LA024
Louisiana NELAP 03046 (AI33904)
Maine 2019020
Maryland 270
Massachusetts M-SC012
Massachusetts PF AS Approv Letter
Michigan 9976
Mississippi SC00012
Nebraska NE-OS-26-13
Nevada scooo 122020-1
New Hampshire NELAP 2054
New Jersey NELAP SC002
New Mexico SC00012
New York NELAP 11501
North Carolina 233
North Carolina SDWA 45709
North Dakota R-158
Oklahoma 2019-165
Pennsylvania NELAP 68-00485
Puerto Rico SC00012
S. Carolina Radiochem 10120002
Sanitation Districts of L 9255651
South Carolina Chemistry 10120001
Tennessee TN 02934
TexasNELAP TI04704235-20-16
UtahNELAP SCOOOI22020-32
Vermont VT87156
Virginia NELAP 460202
Washington C780
Page 8 of 13 SDG: 508151
Radiochemistry
Technical Case Narrative
Energy Fuels Resources
SDG #: 508151
Product: GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid
Analytical Method: EPA 903.0
Analytical Procedure: GL-RAD-A-044 REV# 10
Analytical Batch: 1987404
The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s).
GEL Sample ID#
508151001
1204540495
1204540496
1204540497
1204540498
1204540499
Client Sam pie Identification
Westwater Spring
Method Blank (MB)
50815100 I (Westwater Spring) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
50815100l(Westwater Spring) Matrix Spike (MS)
508151001(Westwater Spring) Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.
Data Summary:
All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and
procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where
applicable, with the following exceptions.
Preparation Information
Aliquot Reduced
aliquots were reduced due to limited sample volume.
Miscellaneous Information
Additional Comments
The matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate, 1204540497 (Westwater SpringMS) and 1204540498 (Westwater
SpringMSD), aliquots were reduced to conserve sample volume.
Certification Statement
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.
Page 9 of 13 SDG: 508151
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Qualifier Definition Report
for
DNMIOOI Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Client SDG: 508151 GEL Work Order: 508151
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
** Analyte is a surrogate compound
U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
ReviewN alidation
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data reviewer. In addition, all CLP-like deliverables
receive a third level review of the fractional data package.
The following data validator verified the information presented in this data report:
Signature: j~ ~ Name: Theresa Austin
Date: 16 APR 2020 Title: Group Leader
Page 10 of 13 SDG: 508151
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summarr
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Workorder: 508151
Parm name NOM
Rad Gas Flow
3atch 1987404
QC1204540496 508151001 DUP
Gross Radium Alpha u 0.559 u
Uncertainty +l-0.300
QC1204540499 LCS
Gross Radium Alpha 739
Uncertainty
QC1204540495 MB
Gross Radium Alpha u
Uncertainty
QC 1204540497 508151001 MS
Gross Radium Alpha 4470 u 0.559
Uncertainty +l-0.300
QC 1204540498 508151001 MSD
Gross Radium Alpha 4470 u 0.559
Uncertainty +l-0.300
Notes:
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (]-sigma).
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
**
<
>
Analyte is a surrogate compound
Result is less than value reported
Result is greater than value reported
The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product
C Units
-0.0904 pCilL
+l-0.198
766 pCilL
+l-9.24
0.310 pCilL
+l-0.261
5060 pCilL
+l-56.2
5090 pCi/L
+l-55.5
RPO%
NIA
0.764
A
B
BD
C
D
F
H
K
L
M
For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank.
Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low
Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis
Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample
Estimated Value
Analytical holding time was exceeded
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actual value is expected to be lower.
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low. Actual value is expected to be higher.
M if above MDC and less than LLD
Page 12 of 13 SDG: 508151
Report Date: April 14, 2020
REC% Rane Anlst
NIA JXK3
104 (75%-125%)
113 (75%-125%)
114 (0%-20%)
Page 1 of
Date Time
04113120 13: 1,
04113120 13: 1,
04113120 13: l 1
04113120 13: I•
04113120 13 :1,
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 508151
Parmname NOM Sam ual QG __ U~nc..cit-'-s _--=.cR=PD% REC% Rang~Anlst
M Matrix Related Failure
NIA RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.
NI
ND
NJ
Q
R
u
UI
UJ
UL
X
y
I\
h
See case narrative
Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER.
Sample results are rejected
Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification
Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification
Not considered detected. The associated number is the reported concentration, which may be inaccurate due to a low bias.
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
QC Samples were not spiked with this compound
RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +I-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.
Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded
Page 2 of
Date Time
NI A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike cone. by a factor of 4 or more or %RPD not applicable.
"The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater than
five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of +I-the
RL is used to evaluate the DUP result.
* Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.
For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.
Page 13 of 13 SDG: 508151
3440 South 700 West
,alt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
:-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Tanner Holliday
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 South Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
TEL: [phone]
RE: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Dear Tanner Holliday: Lab Set ID: 2006528
American West Analytical Laboratories received sample( s) on 6/18/2020 for the analyses
presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AW AL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) in Utah and Texas; and is
state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, Wyoming, and Missouri.
All analyses were performed in accordance to the NELAP protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation scope documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
Thank You,
Approved by:
J G Digitally signed 058 . by Jose G.
Rocha Rocha Date: 2020.07.06
16:35:43 -06'00'
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page I of38
All analyses applicable to lhe CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance lo NELAC prolocols Per1inent sampling information is localed on lhe allached COC. Confidenlial Business Information: This report is provided for lhe exclusi\·e use or Lhe
~ddressee Pri, ile~es o.f sub,.5eq~ent ~~e of lhe ~~e of lhis.co~pnny or an) ~mber of its stnIT. or reproduclio~ ~f this repo~ in ~on~eclion .. with the a~ver1isemenl, P~?motio.n or sale of ?1!)~ ~rod~cl or P~?cess, ~r in ~onm~c!ion w!lh lh~ r~-publication of Lhis repon
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
AN"lYrtCAL I AflORATORIFS Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Lab Set ID: 2006528
Date Received: 6/18/2020 llOOh
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
3440 South 700 West
2006528-00 I A Westwater Seep 6/16/2020 845h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method ;alt Lake City, UT 84119 8260D/5030C
2006528-001 B Westwater Seep 6/16/2020 845h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
2006528-0018 Westwater Seep 6/16/2020 845h Aqueous Alkalinity/ Bicarbonate/
Carbonate, Low Level
Phone: [phone] 2006528-00 l C Westwater Seep 6/16/2020 845h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
Toll Free: [phone] 2006528-001 D Westwater Seep 6/16/2020 845h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Fax: [phone] 2006528-001 D Westwater Seep 6/16/2020 845h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
!-mail: [e-mail] 2006528-00 l E Westwater Seep 6/16/2020 845h Aqueous Ion Balance
2006528-00 l E Westwater Seep 6/16/2020 845h Aqueous ICP Metals, Dissolved
web: www.awal-labs.com 2006528-00 l E Westwater Seep 6/16/2020 845h Aqueous ICPMS Metals, Dissolved
2006528-001 E Westwater Seep 6/16/2020 845h Aqueous Mercury, Drinking Water
Dissolved
Kyle F. Gross 2006528-002A Ruin Spring 6/16/2020 1035h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260D/5030C
Laboratory Director 2006528-0028 Ruin Spring 6/16/2020 1035h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
2006528-0028 Ruin Spring 6/16/2020 1035h Aqueous Alkalinity/ Bicarbonate/
Jose Rocha Carbonate, Low Level
QA Officer 2006528-002C Ruin Spring 6/16/2020 1035h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
2006528-002D Ruin Spring 6/16/2020 1035h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
2006528-002D Ruin Spring 6/16/2020 1035h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
2006528-002E Ruin Spring 6/16/2020 1035h Aqueous Ion Balance
2006528-002E Ruin Spring 6/16/2020 1035h Aqueous ICP Metals, Dissolved
2006528-002E Ruin Spring 6/16/2020 1035h Aqueous ICPMS Metals, Dissolved
2006528-002E Ruin Spring 6/16/2020 1035h Aqueous Mercury, Drinking Water
Dissolved
2006528-003A Cottonwood Spring 6/16/2020 945h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260D/5030C
2006528-0038 Cottonwood Spring 6/16/2020 945h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
2006528-0038 Cottonwood Spring 6/16/2020 945h Aqueous Alkalinity/ Bicarbonate/
Carbonate, Low Level
2006528-003C Cottonwood Spring 6/16/2020 945h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
2006528-003D Cottonwood Spring 6/16/2020 945h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
2006528-003D Cottonwood Spring 6/16/2020 945h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
2006528-003E Cottonwood Spring 6/16/2020 945h Aqueous Ion Balance
2006528-003E Cottonwood Spring 6/16/2020 945h Aqueous ICP Metals, Dissolved
2006528-003E Cottonwood Spring 6/16/2020 945h Aqueous ICPMS Metals, Dissolved
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page 2 of38
All analyses .ipplicable to lhe CWA. SOWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NE LAC protocols, Peninenl sampling infonnalion is located on lhe attached COC Confidential Business lnformalion: This report is pro,•ided for the exclush e use of \he
~ddressee Pri, ile~es o.f sub~seq~cnt ~~e of Lhe ~~e of this .con:ipany or nny ~mber of ils Slaff, or reproductio~ ~r lhis repo~ in ~o~eclion~ with Lhe a~~ertise~nl, P~?motio.n or sale or ~y ~rod~ct or P~?Cess, ~r in ~onn:_c!ion ,, !th Lh? r~-publicaLion of Lhis report
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Lab Set ID: 2006528
ANA i VT ICAL I AFlORATOR1rs Date Received: 6/18/2020 1100h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
2006528-003E Cottonwood Spring 6/16/2020 945h Aqueous Mercury, Drinking Water
3440 South 700 West 2006528-004A Entrance Seep 6/16/2020
Dissolved
1105h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
;alt Lake City, UT 84119 8260D/5030C
2006528-0048 Entrance Seep 6/16/2020 1105h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
2006528-004B Entrance Seep 6/16/2020 1105h Aqueous Alkalinity/ Bicarbonate/
Carbonate, Low Level
Phone: [phone] 2006528-004C Entrance Seep 6/16/2020 1105h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
Toll Free: [phone] 2006528-004D Entrance Seep 6/16/2020 1105h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Fax: [phone] 2006528-004D Entrance Seep 6/16/2020 1105h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
!-mail: [e-mail] 2006528-004E Entrance Seep 6/16/2020 1105h Aqueous ICP Metals, Dissolved
2006528-004E Entrance Seep 6/16/2020 1105h Aqueous ICPMS Metals, Dissolved
web: www.awal-labs.com 2006528-004E Entrance Seep 6/16/2020 1105h Aqueous Ion Balance
2006528-004E Entrance Seep 6/16/2020 1105h Aqueous Mercury, Drinking Water
Dissolved
2006528-005A Back Spring 6/16/2020 945h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method Kyle F. Gross 8260D/5030C
Laboratory Director 2006528-0058 Back Spring 6/16/2020 945h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
2006528-005B Back Spring 6/16/2020 945h Aqueous Alkalinity/ Bicarbonate/
Jose Rocha Carbonate, Low Level
QA Officer 2006528-005C Back Spring 6/16/2020 945h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
2006528-005D Back Spring 6/16/2020 945h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
2006528-005D Back Spring 6/16/2020 945h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
2006528-005E Back Spring 6/16/2020 945h Aqueous Ion Balance
2006528-005E Back Spring 6/16/2020 945h Aqueous ICP Metals, Dissolved
2006528-005E Back Spring 6/16/2020 945h Aqueous ICPMS Metals, Dissolved
2006528-005E Back Spring 6/16/2020 945h Aqueous Mercury, Drinking Water
Dissolved
2006528-006A Trip Blank 6/16/2020 845h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260D/5030C
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page 3 of38
All anal~ses applicable lo lhe CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC prolocols. Pertinent sampling informalion is located on the allached COC Confidential Business lnformalion: This report is provided for the e'.';Clusi\·e use of [he
~ddressee Pririle~es orsub.seq~en\ ~;ie of the n ... ~e of this .co~pany or an~· ~mber of ils slaff, or reproductio~ ~r1his repo~ in .co~eclion~ with the a~~ertisement, P~?motio;n or sale of~~ ~rodl~I or P~?cess, ~r in ~onn:_c!ion w~lh lh~ r~-publication or this report
3440 South 700 West
;alt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
!-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Inorganic Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Tanner Holliday
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
2006528
6/18/2020
6/16/2020
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation of all
samples were performed within the method holding times. All samples were properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD:
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike / Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, with the
following exceptions:
Sample ID Analyte QC Explanation
2006528-00 IE Calcium MS/MSD High analyte concentration
2006528-001 E Sodium MS/MSD High analyte concentration
2006528-002D Ammonia MS/MSD Sarni ematrix interference
Duplicate (DUP): The parameters that required a duplicate analysis had RPDs
within the control limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page 4 of38
All analyses applicable lo the CWA, SOWA. and RCRA are perfom1ed in accordance to NELAC prolocols, Pertinent sampling information is located on the anached COC Confidenti.il Business fnformalion: This report is pro,•ided for the exclusiYe use oflhe
~ddressee Pri, ile~es o_f sub~seq~nl ~~e of lhe ~~e of this .con:ipany or nny ~mber of its staff, or reproductio~ ~~ this repo~ in ~~ecLion~ with the ~vertisement, P~?motio.n or sale of ?-1!Y. ~rod~ct or p~~cess. ~r in ~11ni;c~ion "~lh lh~ ri;-publication of this report
3440 South 700 West
,alt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone:[phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
!-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Volatile Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Tanner Holliday
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
Method:
Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
2006528
6/18/2020
6/16/2020
Intact
None
SW-846 8260D/5030C
Analysis: Volatile Organic Compounds
General Set Comments: One or more target analytes were observed above reporting
limits.
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: All samples were received in appropriate
containers and properly preserved. The analysis and preparation of all samples were
performed within the method holding times following the methods stated on the analytical
reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, and Surrogates:
Method Blanks (MBs): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCSs): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike / Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Surrogates: All surrogate recoveries were within established limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page 5 of38
All anaJyses applicable LO the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are perfom1ed in accordance lo NELAC protocols Pertinenl sampling informotion is located on Lhe altached COC Conlidenliol Business Information: This report is provided for lhe exclusi,e use of the
~ddressee Pri\·ile~es o[su~eq~nt ~e of the ?_~e of Lhis .co~pany or M)' '!:mber of its sta1T, or reproduclio~ ~fthis repo~ in ~on~eclion~ with the ~~ertise~ent, P~?moli°:'1 or sale of ~Y. ~rod~ct or p~ocess, ~r in ~nn~~ion w~Lh th? r:-p~blicalion of lhis report
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone] Laboratory Director
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
American West QCSUMM_A.RY REPORT ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Lab Set ID: 2006528 Dept: ME
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020 QC Type: LCS
Reporting Amount Spiked Spike Ref. RPDRef. RPD
Aoalyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Amount %REC Limits Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Lab Sample ID: LCS-70574 Date Analyzed: 07/01/2020 1849h
Test Code: 200.7-DIS Date Prepared: 06/19/2020 1313h
Calcium 9.94 mg/L E200.7 0.211 1.00 10.00 0 99.4 85 -115
Magnesium 10.0 mg/L E200.7 0.0654 1.00 10.00 0 100 85 -115
Potassium 10.4 mg/L E200.7 0.246 1.00 10.00 0 104 85 -115
Sodium 10.5 mg/L E200,7 0.123 1.00 10.00 0 105 85 -115
Lab Sample ID: LCS-70574 Date Analyzed: 07/03/2020 1155h
Test Code: 200.7-DIS Date Prepared: 06/19/2020 1313h
Vanadium 0.212 mg/L E200.7 0.00252 0.00500 0.2000 0 106 85 -115
Lab Sample ID: LCS-70576 Date Analyzed: 06/22/2020 1128h
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared: 06/19/2020 1313h
Manganese 0.191 mg/L E200 8 0.000766 0.00200 0.2000 0 95,6 85 -115
Lab Sample ID: LCS-70576 Date Analyzed: 07/01/2020 1311 h
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared: 06/19/2020 1313h
Arsenic 0.188 mg/L E200.8 0.000298 0.00200 0.2000 0 93.9 85 -115
Beryllium 0.206 mg/L E200.8 0.000198 0.00200 0.2000 0 103 85 -115
Cadmium 0.189 mg/L E200.8 0.0000742 0.000500 0.2000 0 94.6 85 -115
Chromium 0.197 mg/L E200.8 0.00191 0.00200 0.2000 0 98.3 85 -115
Cobalt 0.199 mg/L E200,8 0.000300 0.00400 0.2000 0 99.3 85 -115
Copper 0.202 mg/L E200.8 0.00166 0.00200 0.2000 0 101 85 -115
Iron 0.974 mg/L E200.8 0.0328 0.100 1.000 0 97.4 85 -115
Lead 0.198 mg/L E200,8 0.000448 0.00200 0.2000 0 99.0 85 -115
Molybdenum 0.195 mg/L E200,8 0.000652 0.00200 0.2000 0 97.6 85 -115
Nickel 0.198 mg/L E200.8 0.000728 0.00200 0.2000 0 98.9 85 -115
Selenium 0.184 mg/L E200.8 0.000508 0.00200 0.2000 0 92.0 85 -115
Silver 0.190 mg/L E200.8 0.000232 0.00200 0.2000 0 94.9 85 -II 5
Thallium 0.195 mg/L E200 8 0.000390 0.00200 0.2000 0 97.6 85 -115
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page 22 of38
analyses applicable to the CWA, SOWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use oftf
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re•publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact, This
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 2006528
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: LCS-70576 Date Anal y,:.ed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared:
Tin 0.989
Uranium 0204
inc 0.994
Lab Sample ID: LCS-70662 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: HG-DW-DIS-245.1 Date Prepared:
Mercury 0.00339
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QCS1)_MMA&YJIBPO_RT
Contact:
Dept:
Tanner Holliday
ME
Units Method
07/01/2020 1311h
06/19/2020 1313h
mg/L E200,8
mg/L E200.8
mg/L E200.8 -06/25/2020 908h
06/24/2020 1313h
mg/L E245.I
MDL
0.00115
0.000176
0.00418
0.0000396
Reporting
Limit
0.00400
0.00200
0.00600
0.0000900
QC Type: LCS
Amount Spiked Spike Ref.
1.000
0.2000
1.000
0.003330
Amount
0
0
0
0
%REC
98.9
102
99.4
102
Limits
85 -115
85 -115
85 -115
85 -115
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Limit Amt %RPO Qua!
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page 23 of38
analyses applicable to the CWA, SOWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of fr
ne of th.is company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
A.merican West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 2006528
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: MB-70574 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.7-DIS Date Prepared:
Calcium < 1.00
Magnesium < 1.00
Potassium < 1.00
Sodium < 1.00
Lab Sample ID: MB-70574 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.7-DIS Date Prepared:
Vanadium < 0.00500
Lab Sample ID: MB-70576 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared:
Manganese < 0.00200 -Lab Sample ID: MB-FILTER-70557 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared:
Manganese < 0.00200
Lab Sample ID: MB-70576 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared:
Arsenic < 0.000200
Beryllium < 0.000200
Cadmium < 0.0000500
Chromium < 0.000200
Cobalt < 0.000400
Copper < 0.000200
Iron < 0.0100
Lead < 0.000200
Molybdenum < 0.000200
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARYREPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount Spiked
Units Method MDL Limit
07/01/2020 1846h
06/19/2020 1313h
mg/L E200.7 0.211 1.00
mg/L E200.7 0.0654 1.00
mg/L E200.7 0.246 1.00
mg/L E200.7 0.123 1.00 -07/03/2020 1152h
06/19/2020 1313h
mg/L E200.7 0.00252 0.00500
06/22/2020 1124h
06/19/2020 13 I Jh
n:ig;IL E200.8 0.000766 0.00200 -06/22/2020 1152h
06/19/2020 1313h
mg/L E200.8 0.000766 0.00200 -07/01/2020 1308h
06/19/2020 1313h
mg/L E200.8 0.0000298 0.000200
mg/L E200.8 0.0000198 0.000200
mg/L E200.8 0.00000742 0.0000500
mg/L E200.8 0.000191 0.000200
mg/L E200.8 0.0000300 0.000400
mg/L E200.8 0.000166 0.000200
mg/L E200.8 0.00328 0.0100
mg/L E200.8 0.0000448 0.000200
mg/L E200.8 0.0000652 0.000200
Tanner Holliday
ME
MBLK
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPO Ref. RPO
Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page 24 of38
analyses applicable to the CWA, SOWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols, Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use oftl-
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
Am,erican West
ANALYTICAL LABORATOAtES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 2006528
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: MB-70576 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared:
Nickel < 0.000200
Selenium < 0.000200
Silver < 0.000200
Thallium < 0.000200
Tin < 0.000400
Uranium < 0.000200
Zinc < 0.000600
Lab Sample ID: MB-70662 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: HG-DW-DIS-245.1 Date Prepared:
Mercury < 0.0000900
Lab Sample ID: MB-FILTER-70655 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: HG-DW-DIS-245.1 Date Prepared:
Mercury < 0.0000900
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount Spiked
Units Method MDL Limit
07/01/2020 1308h
06/19/2020 1313h
mg/L E200.8 0.0000728 0.000200
mg/L E200 8 0.0000508 0.000200
mg/L E200.8 0.0000232 0.000200
mg/L E200.8 0.0000390 0.000200
mg/L E200 8 0.000115 0.000400
mg/L E200.8 0.0000176 0.000200
mg/L E200.8 0.000418 0.000600 -06/25/2020 906h
06/24/2020 1313 h
mg/L E245.l 0.0000396 0.0000900
06/25/2020 936h
06/24/2020 1313h
mg/L E245 .l 0.0000396 0.0000900
Tanner Holliday
ME
MBLK
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page 25 of38
analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NE LAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC Confidential Business lnfonnation: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of ti-
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee wi11 be granted only on contact Thls
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone] Laboratory Director
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
American West QC SUMMARY REPORT ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Lab Set ID: 2006528 Dept: ME
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020 QC Type: MS
Reporting Amount Spiked Spike Ref. RPO Ref. RPO
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Amount %REC Limits Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Lab Sample ID: 2006528-00 lEMS Date Analyzed: 07/01/2020 1859h
Test Code: 200.7-DIS Date Prepared: 06/19/2020 1313h
Calcium 218 mg/L E200.7 2.11 10.0 10.00 204 146 70 -130
Magnesium 65.6 mg/L E200,7 0.654 10.0 10.00 54.6 109 70 -130
Sodium 262 mg/L E200.7 1.23 10.0 10.00 245 166 70 -130
Lab Sample ID: 2006528-00IEMS Date Analyzed: 07/03/2020 1200h
Tes1 Code: 200.7-DIS Date Prepared: 06/19/2020 1313h
Potassium 16.7 mg/L E200.7 0.246 LOO 10.00 5.28 114 70 -130
Vanadium 0.230 mg/L E200,7 0.00252 0.00500 0.2000 0 115 70 -130
Lab Sample ID: 2006528-00IEMS Date Analyzed: 06/22/2020 1145h
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared: 06/19/2020 1313h
Manganese 0.231 mg/L E200.8 0.000766 0.00200 0.2000 0.0354 97.7 75 -125
Lab Sample ID: 2006528-00IEMS Date Analyzed: 07/01/2020 1317h
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared: 06/19/2020 1313h
Arsenic 0.206 mg/L E200,8 0.000298 0.00200 0.2000 0.00157 102 75 -125
Beryllium 0.220 mg/L E200,8 0.000198 0.00200 0.2000 0 110 75 -125
Cadmium 0.199 mg/L E200.8 0.0000742 0.000500 0.2000 0 99.4 75 -125
Chromium 0.206 mg/L E200.8 0.00191 0.00200 0.2000 0 103 75 -125
Cobalt 0.207 mg/L E200.8 0.000300 0.00400 0.2000 0.00046 103 75 -125
Copper 0.211 mg/L E200.8 0.00166 0.00200 0.2000 0 105 75 -125
Iron 1.04 mg/L E200.8 0.0328 0.100 1.000 0 104 75 -125
Lead 0.209 mg/L E200,8 0.000448 0.00200 0.2000 0 104 75 -125
Molybdenum 0.218 mg/L E200.8 0.000652 0.00200 0.2000 0.00933 105 75 -125
Nickel 0.207 mg/L E200.8 0.000728 0.00200 0.2000 0.000968 103 75 -125
Selenium 0.197 mg/L E200.8 0.000508 0.00200 0.2000 0.00121 97.8 75 -125
Silver 0.196 mg/L E200.8 0.000232 0.00200 0.2000 0 98.1 75 -125
Thallium 0.206 mg/L E200.8 0.000390 0.00200 0.2000 0 103 75 -125
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page 26 of38
analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee, Privileges of subsequent use oftt
ne of trus company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee wi11 be granted only on contact This
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 2006528
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: 2006528-00 I EMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared:
Tin 1.06
Uranium 0.233
Zinc 1.05
Lab Sample ID: 2006528-002EMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: HG-DW-DIS-245.1 Date Prepared:
Mercury 0.00348
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMA.RY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount Spiked
Units Method MDL Limit
07/01/2020 131 7h
06/19/2020 1313h
mg/L E200.8 0.00115 0.00400 1.000
mg/L E200.8 0.000176 0.00200 0.2000
mg/L E200.8 0.00418 0.00600 1.000 -06/25/2020 918h
06/24/2020 1313h
mg/L E245.I 0.0000396 0.0000900 0.003330
Tanner Holliday
ME
MS
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
0 106
0.0129 110
0 105
0 105
2 -Analyte concentration is too high for accurate matrix spike recovery and/or RPD.
Limits
75 -125
75 -125
75 -125
85 -I I 5
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD Ref. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page 27 of38
analyses applicable to the CWA, SOWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use oftl-
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re·publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone] Laboratory Director
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
American West QC SUMMA.RY REPORT ANALVTJCAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Lab Set ID: 2006528 Dept: ME
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020 QC Type: MSD
Reporting Amount Spiked Spike Ref. RPD Ref. RPD
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Amount %REC Limits Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Lab Sample ID: 2006528-001 EMSD Date Analyzed: 07 /0 I /2020 1902h
Test Code: 200.7-DIS Date Prepared: 06/19/2020 1313h
Calcium 217 mg/L E200,7 2.11 10.0 10.00 204 135 70 -130 218 0.504 20
Magnesium 67.0 mg/L E200.7 0.654 10.0 10.00 54.6 124 70 -130 65 .6 2.13 20
Sodium 262 mg/L E200.7 1.23 10.0 10.00 245 164 70 -130 262 0.0685 20
Lab Sample ID: 2006528-001 EMSD Date Analyzed: 07/03/2020 1203h
Test Code: 200.7-DIS Date Prepared: 06/19/2020 1313h
Potassium 16.6 mg/L E200,7 0.246 1.00 10.00 5.28 114 70 -130 16.7 0.303 20
Vanadium 0.219 mg/L E200.7 0.00252 0.00500 0.2000 0 109 70 -130 0.23 4.88 20
Lab Sample ID: 2006528-00IEMSD Date Analyzed: 06/22/2020 1148h
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared: 06/19/2020 1313h
Manganese 0.227 mg/L E200.8 0.000766 0.00200 0.2000 0.0354 95.6 75 -125 0.231 1.79 20
Lab Sample ID: 2006528-00IEMSD Date Analyzed: 07/01/2020 1324h
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared: 06/19/2020 1313h
Arsenic 0.196 mg/L E200.8 0.000298 0.00200 0,2000 0.00157 97.1 75 -125 0.206 5.24 20
Beryllium 0.218 mg/L E200,8 0.000198 0.00200 0.2000 0 109 75 -125 0.22 0.925 20
Cadmium 0.201 mg/L E200.8 0.0000742 0.000500 0.2000 0 100 75 -125 0.199 0.910 20
Chromium 0.198 mg/L E200,8 0.00191 0.00200 0.2000 0 99.1 75 -125 0.206 3.66 20
Cobalt 0.200 mg/L E200.8 0.000300 0.00400 0.2000 0.00046 99.9 75 -125 0.207 3.17 20
Copper 0.203 mg/L E200,8 0.00166 0.00200 0.2000 0 102 75 -125 0.211 3.43 20
Iron 0.998 mg/L E200.8 0.0328 0.100 1.000 0 99.8 75 -125 1.04 3.77 20
Lead 0.201 mg/L E200.8 0.000448 0.00200 0.2000 0 IOI 75 -125 0.209 3.82 20
Molybdenum 0.216 mg/L E200.8 0.000652 0.00200 0.2000 0.00933 103 75 -125 0.218 1.12 20
Nickel 0.200 mg/L E200.8 0.000728 0.00200 0.2000 0.000968 99.6 75 -125 0.207 3.11 20
Selenium 0.188 mg/L E200 8 0.000508 0.00200 0.2000 0.00121 93.4 75 -125 0.197 4.56 20
Silver 0.197 mg/L E200.8 0.000232 0.00200 0.2000 0 98.7 75 -125 0.196 0.637 20
Thallium 0.195 mg/L E200.8 0.000390 0.00200 0.2000 0 97.4 75 -125 0.206 5.56 20
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page 28 of 38
analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use of tr
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re•pub}ication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee wiB be granted only on contact This
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 2006528
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Analyte Result -Lab Sample ID: 2006528-00IEMSD Dme Analy-Led:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Dale Prepared:
Tin 103
Uranium 0.225
Zinc 1.02
Lab Sample ID: 2006528-002EMSD Date Analyzed:
Test Code: HG-DW-DIS-245.1 Date Prepared:
Mercury 0.00344
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount Spiked
Units Method MDL Limit
07/01/2020 1324h
06/19/2020 1313h
mg/L E200.8 0.00115 0.00400 1.000
mg/L E200.8 0.000176 0.00200 0.2000
mg/L E200,8 0.00418 0.00600 1.000
06/25/2020 92 lh
06/24/2020 1313h
mg/L E245.I 0.0000396 0.0000900 0.003330
Tanner Holliday
ME
MSD
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
0 103
0.0129 106
0 102
0 103
2 -Analyte concentration is loo high for accurate matrix spike recovery and/or RPD.
Limits
75 -125
75 -125
75 -125
85 -115
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt %RPO Limit
1.06 2.59 20
0.233 3.69 20
1.05 2.38 20
0.00349 I.JO 20
Qual
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page 29 of38
analyses applicable to the CWA, SOWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee, Privileges of subsequent use of ti-
ne of trus company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact, This
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 2006528
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: 2006528-001 CDUP Date Analyzed:
Test Code: TDS-W-2540C
Total Dissolved Solids 1,450
Units
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
_QC SUMMARY REPORl'
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount Spiked
Method MDL Limit
Tanner Holliday
WC
DUP
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
06/19/2020 1209h
mg/L SM2540C 16.0 20.0
Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD Ref. RPD
Amt %RPO Limit
1480 2.18 5
Qua)
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page 30 of38
analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee, Privileges of subsequent use oftt
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee wi11 be granted only on contact. This
.Arne.dean W est
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 2006528
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Analyte Result Units
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
Tanner Holliday
WC
Method MDL
Reporting
Limit
QC Type: LCS
Amount Spiked Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
Lab Sample ID: LCS-RI40263 Date Analyzed: 06/25/2020 1058h
Test Code:
Chloride
Fluoride
Sulfate
300.0-W
Lab Sample ID: LCS-Rl40020
Test Code: ALK-W-23208-LL
Alkalinity (as CaC03)
Lab Sample ID: LCS-70682
Test Code: NH3-W-350.l
Ammonia (as N)
Lab Sample ID: LCS-140246
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N)
Lab Sample ID: LCS-Rl40103
Test Code: TDS-W-2540C
Total Dissolved Solids
5.08
5.17
4.93
Date Analyzed:
250
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
1.87
Date Analyzed:
0.930
Date Analyzed:
186
mg/L E300.0 0.0565
mg/L E300.0 0.0240
mg/L E300.0 0.136
06/19/2020 808h
mg/L SM2320B 0.369
06/25/2020 20 I Sh
06/25/2020 I 035h
mg/L E350.l 0.0473
06/25/2020 1227h
mg/L E353.2 0.00494
06/19/2020 1209h
mg/L SM2540C 8.00
0.100 5.000
0.100 5.000
0.750 5.000
1.00 250.0
0.0500 2.000
0.0100 1.000
10.0 205.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
102
103
98.6
100
93.6
93.0
90.7
Limits
90 -110
90 -110
90-110
90 -110
90 -110
90 -110
80 -120
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPO
Limit Amt %RPO Qual
ReportDate: 7/6/2020 Page3lof38
analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC Confidential Business lnfonnation: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use oftt
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
ANALYT:CAL LABORATOR1i::S
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 2006528
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: MB-Rl40263 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride < 0.100
Fluoride < 0.100
Sulfate < 0.750
Lab Sample ID: MB-Rl40020 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: ALK-W-23208-LL
Bicarbonate (as CaC03) < 1.00
Carbonate (as CaC03) < 1.00
Lab Sample ID: MB-70682 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: NH3-W-350. l Date Prepared:
Ammonia (as N) < 0.0500
Lab Sample ID: MB-140246 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) < 0.0100
Lab Sample ID: MB-Rl40103 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: TDS-W-2540C
Total Dissolved Solids < 10.0
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount Spiked
Units Method MDL Limit
06/25/2020 104th
mg/L E300.0 0.0565 0.100
mg/L E300,0 0.0240 0.100
mg/L E300,0 0.136 0.750
06/19/2020 808h
mg/L SM2320B 0.369 1.00
mg/L SM2320B 0.369 1.00
06/25/2020 2009h
06/25/2020 1035h
mg/L E350.l 0.0473 0.0500
06/25/2020 1225h
mg/L E353 ,2 0.00494 0.0100
06/19/2020 1209h
mg/L SM2540C 8.00 10.0
Tanner Holliday
WC
MBLK
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPO Ref. RPO
Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page 32 of38
analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NE LAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use of tJ-
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact, This
Ame.rican West ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QCSUMMARX _REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 2006528
Contact: Tanner Holliday
Dept: WC
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Analyte
Lab Sample ID: 2006528-002BMS
Test Code:
Chloride
Fluoride
Sulfate
300.0-W
Lab Sample ID: 2006528-00lBMS
Test Code: ALK-W-23208-LL
Alkalinity (as CaC03)
Lab Sample ID: 2006528-002DMS
Test Code: NH3-W-350.1
Ammonia (as N)
Lab Sample ID: 2006528-00JDMS
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N)
Result Units Method
Date Analyzed: 06/25/2020 1943h
430 mg/L E300.0
412 mg/L E300,0
848 mg/L E300.0
Date Analyzed: 06/19/2020 808h
2,940 mg/L SM2320B
Date Analyzed: 06/25/2020 2055h
Date Prepared: 06/25/2020 1035h
1.60 mg/L E350,l
Date Analyzed: 06/25/2020 1246h
1.08 mg/L E353 .2
MDL
4.52
1.92
10.9
0.369
0.0473
0.00494
1 -Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
QCType: MS
Reporting Amount Spiked Spike Ref.
Limit Amount %REC
8.00 400.0 25.8 IOI
8.00 400.0 0 103
60.0 400.0 469 94.7
1.00 2,500 450 99.8
0.0500 2.000 0 80.1
0.0100 1.000 0.0978 97.7
Limits
90 -110
90 -110
90 -110
80 -120
90 -110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD Ref. RPD
Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page 33 of38
analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use ofti"
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone] Laboratory Director
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
American West QC SUMMARY REPORT ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Lab Set ID: 2006528 Dept: WC
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020 QC Type: MSD
Reporting Amount Spiked Spike Ref. RPDRef. RPD
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Amount %REC Limits Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Lab Sample ID: 2006528-002BMSD Date Analyzed: 06/25/2020 1959h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 431 mg/L E300.0 4.52 8.00 400.0 25.8 IOI 90 -110 430 0.257 20
Fluoride 426 mg/L E300.0 1.92 8.00 400.0 0 106 90 -110 412 3.21 20
Sulfate 898 mg/L E300.0 10.9 60.0 400.0 469 107 90 -110 848 5.73 20
Lab Sample ID: 2006528-001 BMSD Date Analyzed: 06/19/2020 808h
Test Code: ALK-W-23208-LL
Alkalinity (as CaC03) 2,950 mg/L SM2320B 0.369 1.00 2,500 450 100 80 -120 2950 0.170 10
Lab Sample ID: 2006528-002DMSD Date Analyzed: 06/25/2020 2055h
Test Code: NH3-W-350. I Date Prepared: 06/25/2020 I 035h
Ammonia (as N) 1.63 mg/L E350.l 0.0473 0.0500 2.000 0 81.6 90 -110 1.6 1.79 10
Lab Sample ID: 2006528-00JDMSD Date Analyzed: 06/25/2020 1247h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.08 mg/L E353.2 0.00494 0.0100 1.000 0.0978 98.6 90 -110 1.08 0.834 IO
1 -Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page 34 of38
analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols, Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use oft~
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 2006528
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: LCS VOC-2 061920A Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 8260D-W-DEN100
2-Butanone 23.6
Acetone 19.2
Benzene 20.3
Carbon tetrachloride 21.8
Chloroform 20.0
Chloromethane 14.4
Methylene chloride 18.1
Naphthalene 18.0
Tetrahydrofuran 18.6
Toluene 21.3
Xylenes, Total 65.8
Surr: l,2-Dichloroethane-d4 48.5
Surr: 4-Bromotluorobenzene 52.2
Surr: Dibromotluoromethane 52.2
Surr: Toluene-d8 52.7
Units
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount Spiked
Method MDL Limit
Tanner Holliday
MSVOA
LCS
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
06/19/2020 709h
µg/L SW8260D 1.22 20.0 20.00 0 118
µg/L SW8260D 2.76 20.0 20.00 0 96.2
µg/L SW8260D 0.147 1.00 20.00 0 102
µg/L SW8260D 0.859 1.00 20.00 0 109
µg/L SW8260D 0.166 1.00 20.00 0 99.9
µg/L SW8260D 0.802 1.00 20.00 0 72.2
µg/L SW8260D 0.381 1.00 20.00 0 90.3
µg/L SW8260D 0.704 1.00 20.00 0 90.2
µg/L SW8260D 0.436 1.00 20.00 0 92.8
µg/L SW8260D 0.285 1.00 20.00 0 106
µg/L SW8260D 0.575 1.00 60.00 0 110
µg/L SW8260D 50.00 97.0
µg/L SW8260D 50.00 104
µg/L SW8260D 50.00 104
µg/L SW8260D 50.00 105
Limits
74 -236
70 -350
80 -127
66 -143
79 -124
30 -149
65 -154
55 -128
59 -135
69 -129
66 -124
80 -136
85 -121
78 -132
81 -123
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page 35 of38
analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee, Privileges of subsequent use oftr
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee wi1l be granted only on contact This
American 'West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 2006528
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: MB VOC-2 061920A Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 8260D-W-DEN100
2-Butanone <20.0
Acetone <20.0
Benzene < 1.00
Carbon tetrachloride < 1.00
Chloroform < 1.00
Chloromethane < 1.00
Methylene chloride < 1.00
Naphthalene < 1.00
Tetrahydrofuran < 1.00
Toluene < 1.00
Xylenes, Total < 1.00
Surr: l,2-Dichloroethane-d4 47.0
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 54.1
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 46.2
Surr: Toluene-d8 53.2
Units
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC _SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount Spiked
Method MDL Limit
Tanner Holliday
MSVOA
MBLK
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
06/19/2020 729h
µg/L SW8260D 1.22 20.0
µg/L SW8260D 2.76 20.0
µg/L SW82600 0.147 1.00
µg/L SW8260D 0.859 1.00
µg/L SW8260D 0.166 1.00
µg/L SW8260D 0.802 1.00
µg/L SW8260D 0.381 1.00
µg/L SW8260D 0.704 1.00
µg/L SW82600 0.436 1.00
µg/L SW8260D 0.285 1.00
µg/L SW82600 0.575 1.00
µg/L SW8260D 50.00 94.0
µg/L SW8260D 50.00 108
µg/L SW8260D 50.00 92.3
µg/L SW8260D 50.00 106
Limits
80 -136
85 -121
78 -132
81 -123
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD Ref. RPD
Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page 36 of38
analyses applicable to the CWA, SOWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee, Privileges of subsequent use oftt
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted on1y on contact This
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 2006528
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: 2006528-00IAMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 8260D-W-DEN100
2-Butanone 24.0
Acetone 20.0
Benzene 19.5
Carbon tetrachloride 20.9
Chloroform 19.6
Chloromethane 13.5
Methylene chloride 17.5
Naphthalene 19.8
Tetrahydrofuran 16.1
Toluene 20.6
Xylenes, Total 65.8
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 47.9
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 52.4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 51.8
Surr: Toluene-d8 53.0
Units
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMML'\:R\7 REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount Spiked
Method MDL Limit
Tanner Holliday
MSVOA
MS
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
06/19/2020 950h
µg/L SW8260D 1.22 20.0 20.00 0 120
µg/L SW8260D 2.76 20.0 20.00 0 100
µg/L SW8260D 0.147 1.00 20.00 0 97.5
µg/L SW8260D 0.859 1.00 20.00 0 105
µg/L SW8260D 0.166 1.00 20.00 0 97.9
µg/L SW8260D 0.802 1.00 20.00 0 67.6
µg/L SW8260D 0.381 1.00 20.00 0 87.4
µg/L SW8260D 0.704 1.00 20.00 0 99.1
µg/L SW8260D 0.436 1.00 20.00 0 80.6
µg/L SW8260D 0.285 1.00 20.00 0 103
µg/L SW8260D 0.575 1.00 60.00 0 110
µg/L SW8260D 50.00 95.8
µg/L SW8260D 50.00 105
µg/L SW8260D 50.00 104
µg/L SW8260D 50.00 I06
Limits
74 -236
70 -350
80 -127
66 -143
79 -124
30 -149
65 -154
55 -128
59 -135
69 -129
66 -124
80 -136
85 -121
78 -132
81 -123
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPO Ref. RPO
Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page 37 of38
analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use of tr
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in cormection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 2006528
Project: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: 2006528-00IAMSD Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 8260D-W-DEN100
2-Butanone 24.7
Acetone 21.3
Benzene 19.8
Carbon tetrachloride 22.1
Chloroform 20.1
Chloromethane 13.5
Methylene chloride 17.5
Naphthalene 20.5
Tetrahydrofuran 18.1
Toluene 21.3
Xylenes, Total 66.9
Surr: l ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 48.4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 51.5
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 52.0
Surr: Toluene-d8 52.9
Units
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMM~~YllE_PORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount Spiked
Method MDL Limit
Tanner Holliday
MSVOA
MSD
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
06/19/2020 101 lh
µg/L SW8260D 1.22 20.0 20.00 0 124
µg/L SW8260D 2.76 20.0 20.00 0 106
µg/L SW8260D 0.147 1.00 20.00 0 99.1
µg/L SW8260D 0.859 1.00 20.00 0 110
µg/L SW8260D 0.166 1.00 20.00 0 100
µg/L SW8260D 0.802 1.00 20.00 0 67.4
µg/L SW8260D 0.381 1.00 20.00 0 87.4
µg/L SW8260D 0.704 1.00 20.00 0 102
µg/L SW8260D 0.436 1.00 20.00 0 90.3
µg/L SW8260D 0.285 1.00 20.00 0 106
µg/L SW8260D 0.575 1.00 60.00 0 112
µg/L SW8260D 50.00 96.9
µg/L SW8260D 50.00 103
µg/L SW8260D 50.00 104
µg/L SW8260D 50.00 106
Limits
74 -236
70 -350
80 -127
66 -143
79 -124
30 -149
65 -154
55 -128
59 -135
69 -129
66 -124
80 -136
85 -121
78 -132
81 -123
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPO Ref. RPO
Amt %RPO Limit
24 3.12 35
20 6.10 35
19.5 1.63 35
20.9 5.39 35
19.6 2.42 35
13.5 0.297 35
17.5 0 35
19.8 3.23 35
16.1 11.4 35
20.6 3.40 35
65.8 1.63 35
Qual
Report Date: 7/6/2020 Page 38 of38
analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use of tr
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee wi11 be granted only on contact This
American West Analytical Laboratories Rpt Emailed: UL
Denison
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 2006528
Due Date: 7/2/2020
Page 1 of 4
Client:
Client ID:
Project:
Comments:
Sample ID
2006528-00IA
2006528-0018
2006528-001 C
2006528-00ID
2006528-00lE
2006528-002A
2006528-002B
2006528-002C
Printed: 06/18/20 13:25
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
ENE300
Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Contact: Tanner Holliday
QC Level: III WO Type: Project
QC 3 (no chromatograms). EDD-Denison. Email Group; Do not use "*R_" samples as MS/MSD.;
Client Sample ID
Westwater Seep
.: .... ,
Ruin Spring
Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
6/16/2020 0845h
6/16/2020 1035h
6/18/2020 1100h 8260D-W-DENIOO Aqueous
Test Group: 8260D-W-DEN 100; # of Analytes: 11 I# of Surr: 4
300.0-W
3 SEL Analytes: CL F S04
ALK-W-2320B-LL
2 SEL Ana[ytes: ALKB ALKC
TDS-W-2540C
1 SEL Analytes: TDS
NID-W-350.1
1 SEL Ana_lytes: NH3N
NH3-W-PR
N02/N03°W~353.2
1 S~L Analytes: N03N02N
200.7-DIS -
5 SEL Anolyres: CA MG K NA V
200.7-DIS-PR
200.8-DIS
17 SEL Analytes: AS BE CD CR CO CU FE PB MN MO NI SE AG
TLSNUZN
200.8-DIS-PR
HG-DW-DIS-245.1
1 SEL Anolytes: HG
HG-DW-DIS-PR
IONBALANCE
5 SEL Analytes: BALANCE Anions Cations TDS-Balance TDS-Calc
6/18/2020 1100h 8260D-W-DENIOO Aqueous
Test Group: 8260D-W-DENJOO; # of Analytes: 11 I # ofSurr: 4
300.0-W
3 SEL Analytes: CL F S04
ALK-W-2320B-LL
2 SEL Analytes: ALKB ALKC
TDS-W-2540C
1 SEL Anolytes: TDS
VOCFridge
df-wc
df-wc
df-tds
df -no2/no3 & nh3
df -no2/no3 & nh3
df -no2/no3 &.-nb3
df-met
df-met
df-rnet
df-met
df-rnet
df-rnet
df-met
VOCFridge
df-wc
df-wc
df-tds
LABORATORY CHECK: %M O RT O CN O TAT O QC O LUO 0 HOK___ HOK __ _ HOK___ COC Emailed ____ _
3
3
WORK ORDER Summary
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date
2006528-002D Ruin Spring 6/16/2020 103 Sh
2006528-002E
2006528-00JA Cottonwood Spring 6/16/2020 0945h
2006528-00JB
2006528-00JC
2006528-00JD
2006528-00JE
Work Order: 2006528
Due Date: 7/2/2020
Page2 of4
Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
6/18/2020 I IOOh NH3-W-350.I Aqueous
1 SEL Analytes: NH3N
NH3-W-PR
N02/N03-W-353.2
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
200.7-DIS
5 SEL Analytes: CA MG K NA V
200.7-DIS-PR
200.8-DIS
17 SEL Analytes: AS BE CD CR CO CU FE PB MN MO NI SE AG
TLSNUZN
200.8-DIS-PR
HG-DW-DIS-245.1
1 SEL Analytes: HG
HG-DW-DIS-PR
IONBALANCE
5 SEL Analytes: BALANCE Anions Cations TDS-Balance TDS-Calc
6/18/2020 1100h 8260D-W-DENIOO Aqueous
-Test Group: 8260D-W-DENJQO; # of Ana/ytes: 11 I # o/Surr: 4
300.0-W
3 SEL Analytes: CL F S04
ALK-W-2320B-LL
2 SEL Analytes: ALKB ALKC
TDS-W-2540C
I SEL Analytes: TDS
NH3-W-350.l
1 SEL Analyte~: NH3N
NH3-W-PR
N02/N03-W-353.i
I SEL Ana~tes: N03N02N
200.7-DIS
5 SEL Analytes: CA MG K NA V
200.7-DIS-PR
200.8-DIS
I 7 SEL Analytes: AS BE CD CR CO CU FE PB MN MO NI SE AG
TLSNUZN
200.8-DIS-PR
HG-DW-DIS-245.1
I SEL A11alytes: HG
df -no2/no3 & nh3
df -no2/no3 & nh3
df -no2/no3 & nh3
df-met
df-met
df-met
df-met
df-met
df-met
df-met
VOCFridge
df-wc
df-wc
df-tds
df -no2/no3 & nh3
df -no2/no3 & nh3
df -no2/no3 & nh3
df-met
df-met
df-met
df-met
df-met
3
Printed: 06/18/20 13:25 LABORATORY CHECK: %M O RT O CN O TAT O QC O LUO 0 HOK ___ HOK __ _ HOK___ COC Emailed _____ _
WORK ORDER Summary
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date
2006528-003E Cottonwood Spring 6/16/2020 094 Sh
2006528-004A Entrance Seep 6/16/2020 11 OSh
2006528-004B
2006528-004C
2006528-004D
. · •· 2006528-004E •-. '*. ·"' .... :r , ..;,.-. • .;.-
2006528-00SA Back Spring 6/16/2020 0945h
2006528-00SB
2006528-00SC
2006528-00SD
Work Order: 2006528
Due Date: 7/2/2020
Page3 of4
Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
6/18/2020 1100h HG-DW-DIS-PR Aqueous df-met
IONBALANCE df-met
5 SEL Analytes: BALANCE Anions Cations TDS-Balance TDS-Calc
6/18/2020 1100h 8260D-W-DEN100 Aqueous VOCFridge
Test Group_: 8260D-W-DEN100; # of Analytes: 11 1# ofSurr: 4
300.0-W df-wc
3 SEL Analytes: CL F S04
ALK-W-2320B-LL df-wc
2 SEL Analytes: ALKB ALKC
TD8-W-2540C df-tds
1 SEL Analytes: TDS
NH3-W-3SO.l df -no2/no3 & nh3
1 SEL Analytes: NH3N
NH3-W-PR df -no2/no3 & nh3
N02/N03-W-353.2 df -no2/no3 & nh3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
,, _,.., ... 0200.7-DIS ' · .. ~1·-~., .... · .. ,:;,.. df~met,.
5 SEL Analytes: CA MG K NA V
200.7-DIS:PR
200.8-DIS
17 SEL Analytes: AS BE CD CR CO CU FE PB MN MO NJ SE AG
TLSNUZN
200.8-DIS-PR
HG-DW-DIS-245.1
1 SEL Analytes: HG
HG-DW-DIS-PR
IONBALANCE
5 SEL Analytes: BALANCE Anions Cations TDS-Balance TDS-Calc
6/18/2020 1100h 8260D-W-DEN100 Aqueous
Test Group: 8260D-W-DENJOO; # of Analytes: 11 I# ofSurr: 4
300.0-W
3 SEL Analytes: CL F S04
ALK-W-2320B-LL
2 SEL Analytes: ALKB ALKC
TDS-W-2540C
1 SEL Analytes: TDS
NH3-W-3S0.1
1 SEL Analytes: NH3N
df-met
df-met
df-met
df-met
df-met
df-met
VOCFridge
df-wc
df-wc
df-tds
df -no2/no3 & nh3
3
Printed: 06/18/20 13:25 LABORATORY CHECK: %M O RT O CN O TAT O QC O LUO 0 HOK ___ HOK __ _ HOK___ COC Emailed~----
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 2006528 Page 4 of 4
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 7/2/2020
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
2006528-00SD Back Spring 6/16/2020 0945h 6/18/2020 1100h NH3-W-PR Aqueous df -no2/no3 & nh3
N02/N03-W-353.2 df -no2/no3 & nh3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
2006528-00SE 200.7-DIS df-met
5 SEL Analytes: CA MG K NA V
200.7-DIS-PR df-met
200.8-DIS df-met
17 SEL Analytes: AS BE CD CR CO CU FE PB MN MO NI SE AG
TLSNUZN
200.8-DIS-PR df-met
HG-DW-DIS-245.1 df-met
1 SEL Analytes: HG
HG-DW-DIS-PR df-met
IONBALANCE df-met
5 SEL Analytes: BALANCE Anions Cations TDS-Balance TDS-Calc
2006528-006A Trip Blank 6/16/2020 0845h 6/18/2020 11 OOh 8260D-W-DEN100 Aqueous VOCFridge 3 ... , Test Group: 8260D-W-DENJOO; # of Analytes: 11 I# o[Surr: 4
Printed: 06/18/20 13 :25 LABORATORY CHECK: %M O RT 0 CN O TAT D QC O LUO 0 HOK ___ HOK __ _ HOK___ COC Emailed'-------
American West
Analytical Laboratories
463 W. 3600 S. Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone# [phone] Toll Free# [phone] L-~ Fax# [phone] Email [e-mail]
www.awal-labs.com
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Address: 6425 S. Hwy. 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Contact: Tanner Holliday
Phone#: [phone] Cell#:
Email: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Project Name: Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Project#:
PO#:
Sampler Name: Tanner Holliday
Date
Samole ID: Samoled
Westwater Seep 6/16/2020
Ruin Spring 6/16/2020
Cottonwood Spring 6/16/2020
Entrance Seep 6/16/2020
5 ; Back spring 6/16/2020
6 I Trip Blank
I
I
8
8
(I
I
!
Relinquished oy..:...:J .1L. / /-_/_ A
""'('61urc ~ "'" •
V
0nntNllrna: Tanner Hot""-·
Re!inqulst,ed D)r.
Slgnabn
'nn1Name:
~ellnqolsliedby:
!Slnnatun:,
P11/11Name:
Relinqulsne4Dy.
""'naue
"r1ntName:
6/16/2020
Dale;
61V/21l21
mme:
1100
Dale:
ilmo:
Dale:
ilme:
0311)::
,tme:
I
Time
Samoled
845
1035
945
1105
945
845
Rece1ve<1 Dy:
Signature
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
All analysis will be conducted using NELAP accredited mett10ds and all dala will be reported using AWAL's slandard analyte lists and
reporting limi1'1 (POL) unless specifK:aJly requested otherwise on this Chain or Custody and/or attached documenlatkm.
QC Level: I Tum Around Time: Unless other arrangements have been made,
signed reports will be emailed by 5:00 pm on
3 Standard lhe day they are due.
X Include EDD: 0 LOCUS UPLOAD ::E c,j u EXCEL bQ bQ X Field Filtered For: ....,. ::r: ::E Dissolved Metals .... i:f Ii) ::E ~-"" C'l s:· cd ~ z For Compliance With:
c::i &. ~-D NELAP
0 D RCRA o' C'l ;:i" > D CWA c::i ~ C c::i u ;::i 0 SOWA ....,. l') 0 -§' C) D ELAP/A2lA
C) ... ~ u ~-C, 0 NLLAP ~ IJ) C) ~ Ill k rn
(') C) 'iii u ~-D Non-Compliance t;j ... IJ) ~ °i D other: C, :t. •cf i t3' ~ !:2. C!:J t3' = Ill u 41 C) .. ·i:! 0 ~ 0 II IO C: <ii !') C) 0 ;)'; iii ,a .,· Cl) ~ C'l s 0 IJ) Ul OI ~ ~ :::; .ii rn Known Hazards C: II:; :t. d ~ rll 0 .!!! ... ... 0 :i IQ .. u a_ N ~ Ul i Ill < 0 & 0 E 0 ii a • "' 0 ., II:; 0 iS 0 > Samole Comments "' "' ...
7 w X X X X X X X X X X
7 w X X X X X X X X X X
7 w X X X X X X X X X X
7 w X X X X X X X X X X
7 w X X X X X X X X X X
3 w X
Date: Special Instructions:
ITime:
2-..aoCo S-~?
AWAL Lab Sample Set#
Page 1 of 1 r= ""·
Laboratory Use Only
Samples Wete; (A ;?S ,e~-
2 Amblento8
3 Temperatll'f> 0 · (JI ·c
4 Received Brokervleaking
(Improperly SealG y N
5 <!J:J'ty PresGM!d
y N
Checke<I at bench
y N
6 Rl!Cdvod Wlllin
Holding Times
() N
Ir.cc Tape Was:
1 Preseol on Outer Package C) N NA '
2 <'.!)""''"'" on Out..-Package Y N NA
3 Present on Sam pie G y N \
4 Un!Jroken on Sample 0 Y N NA~
Dlscrepancles Between Sample
Labels and COC Record?
y C9
'"'ntName: Sample containers for metals were field filtered. See the R--~ .( c.Li . ().~Ir 'fir Ii_,, Analytical Scope of Work for Reporting Limits and voe analyte ~null.n --l~ ...d -1-7.:. . "I . ~ Time: list. ~-;; / I 0(\ Print Natr\O: ? IA-<.. /L..l -
Recelvea Dy: { Date:
Slanalute
Time:
Print Name:
Received by: Date:
Signature
Time:
Print Name:
I
Analysis
Ammonia
COD
Cvanide
Metals
N02/N03
O&G
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TP04
Cr VI+
Procedure:
Frequency:
Preservation Check Sheet
s le Set Ext amp:
Preservative f 2 J 4-s
pH <2 H2S04 \/_,-~5 V,,-1/ C ,/c.
oH <2 H2S04 /' , I' , r r ,
oH>12NaOH
_pH<2 HN03 i,.7 Yrs y:'.'..5 )~s Xi' 5
oH<2 H2S04 I/ '< v',., 1/ '7 '/.i..S Yes
oH<2HCL I I I r I
oH <2 H2S04
pH>9NaOH,
Zn Acetate
oH <2 H2S04
oH<2 H2S04
pH>9
<NRi)2S04
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
doH
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
If sample is not preserved, properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag COC, notify client if requested
Place client conversation on COC
Samples may be adjusted
All samples requiring preservation
*
+
A
#
•
The sample required additional preservative upon receipt.
The sample was received unpreserved.
The sample was received unpreserved and therefore preserved upon receipt.
The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH < 2 due to the sample matrix.
The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH> __ due to the sample matrix interference .
Lab Set ID:
pH Lot#:
260lr~.z?
Ctj8"']_
m~-1 Laboratories LLC
a member of The GEL Group INC
PO Boxi0712 Ctm1estor1.SC29417
2040 Savage Road Cha~e$1on SC 29407
P 84~ 556.8171
F 84'.l766.1178
July 09, 2020
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Re: Analytical for Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Work Order: 514075
Dear Ms. Weinel:
GEL Laboratories, LLC (GEL) appreciates the opportunity to provide the enclosed analytical results for the
sample(s) we received on June 19, 2020. This original data report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance
with GEL's standard operating procedures.
Test results for NELAP or ISO 17025 accredited tests are verified to meet the requirements of those standards,
with any exceptions noted. The results reported relate only to the items tested and to the sample as received by
the laboratory. These results may not be reproduced except as full reports without approval by the laboratory.
Copies ofGEL's accreditations and certifications can be found on our website at www.gel.com.
Our policy is to provide high quality, personalized analytical services to enable you to meet your analytical needs
on time every time. We trust that you will find everything in order and to your satisfaction. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 4289.
Purchase Order: DW16138
Enclosures
Page 1 of 18 SDG: 514075
_ .. ...,L,,..1--.......... 1 ............
Sincerely,
~~
Samuel Hogan for
Julie Robinson
Project Manager
gel.com
Page 2 of 18 SDG: 514075
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Analytical for
SDG: 514075
July 09, 2020
Laboratory Identification:
GEL Laboratories LLC
2040 Savage Road
Charleston, South Carolina 29407
[phone]
Summary:
Receipt Narrative
for
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
SDG: 514075
Sample receipt: The samples arrived at GEL Laboratories LLC, Charleston, South Carolina on June 19, 2020
for analysis. The samples were delivered with proper chain of custody documentation and signatures. All sample
containers arrived without any visible signs of tampering or breakage. There are no additional comments
concerning sample receipt.
Sample Identification: The laboratory received the following samples:
Case Narrative:
Laboratory ID
514075001
514075002
514075003
514075004
514075005
Client ID
Wastewater Seep
Ruin Spring
Cottonwood Spring
Entrance Seep
Back Spring
Sample analyses were conducted using methodology as outlined in GEL's Standard Operating Procedures. Any
technical or administrative problems during analysis, data review, and reduction are contained in the analytical
case narratives in the enclosed data package.
Page 3 of 18 SDG: 514075
The enclosed data package contains the following sections: Case Narrative, Chain of Custody, Cooler Receipt
Checklist, Data Package Qualifier Definitions and data from the following fractions: Radiochemistry.
Page 4 of 18 SDG: 514075
~~
Samuel Hogan for
Julie Robinson
Project Manager
5\4b15
. .
r <".:: ·, >~~~~ .
-· -.:-reNERGYFUELS RESOURCES
Sheet 1 of 1
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Samples Shipped to: GEL Laboratories, LLC Contact: Tanner Holliday -=2-:-0-40~S-av_a_g_e-=R,....o __ a..,.d________ Ph: 435 678 2221
Charleston, SC 29407 [e-mail]
[phone]
Chain of Custody/Sampling Analysis Request
p . ro1ect Samp1ers N ame s amp ers s· 1gnature
Annual Seeps & Springs L \11M1/J(, J!trf~-/(1 2020 Tanner Holliday
V
Time
Sample ID Date Collected Collected Laboratory Analysis Requested
Westwater Seep 6/16/2020 845 Gross Aloha
Ruin Spring 6/16/2020 1035 Gross Alpha
Cottonwood Sprina 6/16/2020 945 Gross Aloha
Entrance Seep 6/16/2020 1105 Gross Alpha
Back Sorlna 6/16/2020 945 Gross Aloha
Comments: Please send report to Kathy Weinel at kweinel@.energyfuels.com
Relinquished B :(Signature)
.:J~ Tanner Holliday
Relinquished By:(Signature)
Page 5 of 18 SDG: 514075
Date/Time Received By:(Signature)
6/17/2020 /. / ~a,;,,,
1100 /A
Date/Time Received By:(Signature)
Date/Time c:. /l'l/2.o
q'iS
Date/Time
I r.t:rm I l (·::!)()' s'i(J1 ·1oc: , ' , . ~ .11.IU,•.,u,;.;1,
SAMPLE RECEIPT & REVIEW FORM
Client: h~Ml SOG/Alt/COC/Wort, Order: h \4 o,c:.;
Recci\'ctl By: Rl°lrlfJ.I; C:. Onie nccch·ccJ: &. • I q . 2.C · . -.\0 . Circkl •\11pli~bl~
Fed Ex Express FedEx Ground UPS Field Scn•ices Courier Other -
Carrier anti Trncking Number
IZ ll7 Y4V 12 qq5{) '-il7f
Suspc.ctcd Hnurd lnformntion ~ C> 'IC Net Counts> IOOcpm on samples 1101 marked "rndioaetivc", co11tact the Radiation Safety Group for further investigation. > z
Hazard Class Shipped: UNI/:
A)Shio1x:d as a DOT Ma211rdous? .,,.. IH llN2910, Is the Rndioactivc Shijlment Sur,•cy Compliant? Yes Nn
B) Did the client designate the samples are to be / COC nota'tiori or ra,Ho3i:tivc stickers <111 com3incrs e,1unl olicnt rtc~sun1ion.
received as radioac.ti,·c?
C) Did the RSO classify the samples as .,, Maximum Net Counts Obsct\·cd' (Obsc,.·cd Counts . Arca Bnckground Counts); _j2(_.cPi\l / mR/Mr
rndionc1ivc? Cln.ssificd "" Rnll I Rud 2 Rad 3
D) Did the client designate samples ore lcoc lllll31 ion or hnZlird labels 011 containers cqiial client dc.,;ignntion . haz~rdons? .,,
/ U/ Dor E is yes, sclccl Hu211rds below.
E) Did tho RSO idcntiJv oossible hn1.ards? PCB's Flammable Foreign Soil RCRA 1\sbcslos llcrylli11111 Olhcr:
s~m11lc Rccci11t Criteria i'.l < 0 Conuncnls/Qunlificrs (Required for Non-Conforming Items) ;. z z
1 Shipping containers received intact and Circlo Applbbto. Scols brokon Dnm:i~ conu:iinct LC':,~inS containu Olhcr (do..,tibo)
seol~d? /'
2 Cho in or custody documenls included / ~~i,\ ,t,'liooblo; Clicnl conwctcd ond provided COC COC crc.11cd upon rccciipt
with shipment?
3 Samples requiring cold preservation ·y flrescrvntion Melhod: Wet Ice Ice Pucks Dry ice None Other: l r·v ~nll lcmperatnres arc rc~ordcd in Celsius -within (0 .5 6 deg. en• TEMP:
4 Daily check performed and passed on IR Tcm1tcrnturc Device Serial#: 'TR. L• Lq
lemperniurc gun? ..,,, Sceondnry Tempen,ture Device Serial# (If Applicable):
/' Circle ApplicQblc: Seols broken Dam:,.std con1ainct 1.c:iking. conlaincr Olhcr (Jc,c:ribo)
5 Sample containers intact and scaled?
6 Samples requiring chemical preservation / Sompto ID's ond l'on101nors Mfcclcd,
at proper pH? If P,,..~,•r\-1! ... n ... .1 .. LJ I n•ll•
If Y cs, are Encores or Soil Kits present for solic!s? Yes No NA (If i•cs, tnkc to VOA Freezer)
Donny samples require Volatile Do liquid \101\ 1•ials contain acid prcscn·otion? Yes No NA (If unknown, select No)
7 Analysis? / /\re liquid VOA 1>iols free ofhcndspacc? Yes_ No_ N,\_
S:imp)c IO's and co111ni11crs nffcc1~d:
ID's nnd tests affected:
8 Samples received within holding time? .;I#
Sample ID's on COC match ID's on ID's nnd contnincrs nffcc1cd:
9 bottles? ./'
10 Dale & time on COC match date & time Circle /\ppticnblc: No doles on contnincrs No times on ~ontuiners COC missing info Other (describe)
on bottles?
Number of containers received match Circle Applicnblc: No contni11cr count on COC 01her (describe)
11 number indicated on COC?
12 Are sample containers idcntifioblc as
CiEL ftrAv;.tA.t?
13 COC fonn is properly signed in Circle Applicable: Nol relinquished Other (dcscrirn:)
relinauished/receivcd sections?
Comments (Use Conlinunlion Fom, ifnccclcd): " '·
PM (or PMA) review: lnitinls t\..\lZlv Dale {R/7.-Z, I 70 Pose _J_ of _L . GL-CHL-SR-001 Rev 6
Page 6 of 18 SDG: 514075
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
GEL Work Order/SDG: 514075
Client SDG: 514075
Annual Seeps & Springs 2020
Project Manager:
Project Name:
Purchase Order:
Package Level:
EDD Format:
Julie Robinson
DNMI00106 Analytical for
DW16138
LEVEL3
EIM_DNMI
GELID Client Sample ID Client Sample Desc.
514075001 Wastewater Seep
514075002 Ruin Spring
514075003 Cottonwood Spring
514075004 Entrance Seep
514075005 Back Spring
Collect
Date & Time
16-JUN-20 08:45
16-JUN-20 10:35
16-JUN-20 09:45
16-JUN-20 11 :05
16-JUN-20 09:45
Work Order Due Date: 17-JUL-20
Package Due Date: 15-JUL-20
EDD Due Date:
QA Due Date:
IA®'Date:
Receive Time # of
Date & Time Zone Cont.
19-JUN-20 09:45 -2 1
19-JUN-20 09:45 -2 1
19-JUN-20 09:45 -2 1
19-JUN-20 09:45 -2 1
19-JUN-20 09:45 -2 1
17-JUL-20
17-JUL-20
18-JUL-20
Lab
Matrix
GROUND WATER
GROUND WATER
GROUND WATER
GROUND WATER
GROUND WATER
Report Date: 09-JUL -20
Work Order: 514075
Page 1 of 2
Collector: C
Prelogin #: 20190486669
Project Workdef ID: 1329132
SDG Status: Closed
Logged by:
Fax Daysto Prelog Lab Field
Due Date Process CofC# Group QC QC
19
19
19
19
19
Client Sample ID Status Tests/Methods
Product
Reference Fax Date PM Comments Aux Data
Receive
Codes
-001 Wastewater Seep
-002 Ruin Spring
-003 Cottonwood Spring
-004 Entrance Seep
-005 Back Spring
REVW GFPC, Total Alpha Radium,
Liquid
REVW GFPC, Total Alpha Radium,
Liquid
REVW GFPC, Total Alpha Radium,
Liquid
REVW GFPC, Total Alpha Radium,
Liquid
REVW GFPC, Total Alpha Radium,
Liquid
Product: GFCTORAL Workdef ID: 1461303
Method: EPA 903.0
Product Description: GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid
Samples: 001, 002, 003, 004, 005
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS# Parmname
Gross Radium Alpha
Gross Alpha
Gross Alpha
Gross Alpha
Gross Alpha
Gross Alpha
In Product Group? No Group Name:
Client RDL or
PQL & Unit
Reporting
Units
pCi/L
Group Reference:
Path: Drinking Water (903.0 or 9315)
Product Reference: Gross Alpha
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
REG y y No
\r) r---0 -.:::t" ......
0 Cl r:/1
00 ......
4-< 0
r---
(1)
00 ~ p...
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
Contingent
Tests
Action
Login Requirements:
Product Name Description
Requirement
Samples
Include? Comments
Peer Review by:. ___________ _ Work Order (SDG#), PO# Checked? ____ _
Report Date: 09-JUL-20
Work Order: 514075
Page 2 of 2
C of C signed in receiver location? _____ _
If) r--0 s::t" -If)
ci Q
00
00 -4-4 0
00
ll.) ~ 0...
List of current GEL Certifications as of 09 July 2020
State Certification
Alabama 42200
Alaska 17-018
Alaska Drinking Water SC00012
Arkansas 88-0651
CLIA 42D0904046
California 2940
Colorado SC00012
Connecticut PH-0169
DoD ELAP/ ISO 17025 A2LA 2567.01
Florida NELAP E87156
Foreign Soils Permit P330-15-00283,P330-15-00253
Georgia SC00012
Georgia SDWA 967
Hawaii SC00012
Idaho SC00012
Illinois NELAP 200029
Indiana C-SC-01
Kansas NELAP E-10332
Kentucky SOW A 90129
Kentucky Wastewater 90129
Louisiana Drinking Water LA024
Louisiana NELAP 03046 (AI33904)
Maine 2019020
Maryland 270
Massachusetts M-SC012
Massachusetts PF AS Approv Letter
Michigan 9976
Mississippi SC00012
Nebraska NE-OS-26-13
Nevada scooo 122020-1
New Hampshire NELAP 2054
New Jersey NELAP SC002
New Mexico SC00012
New York NELAP 11501
North Carolina 233
North Carolina SDWA 45709
North Dakota R-158
Oklahoma 2019-165
Pennsylvania NELAP 68-00485
Puerto Rico SCOOOl2
S. Carolina Radiochem 10120002
Sanitation Districts of L 9255651
South Carolina Chemistry 10120001
Tennessee TN 02934
TexasNELAP Tl04704235-20-17
UtahNELAP SCOOOl22020-32
Vermont VT87156
Virginia NELAP 460202
Washington C780
Page 9 of 18 SDG: 514075
Radiochemistry
Technical Case Narrative
Energy Fuels Resources
SDG #: 514075
Product: GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid
Analytical Method: EPA 903.0
Analytical Procedure: GL-RAD-A-044 REV# 10
Analytical Batch: 2013767
The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s).
GEL Sample ID#
514075001
514075002
514075003
514075004
514075005
1204583696
1204583697
1204583698
1204583699
1204583700
Client Sample rdentification
Westwater Seep
Ruin Spring
Cottonwood Spring
Entrance Seep
Back Spring
Method Blank (MB)
514075005(Back Spring) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
514075005(Back Spring) Matrix Spike (MS)
514075005(Back Spring) Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.
Data Summary:
All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and
procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where
applicable, with the following exceptions.
Miscellaneous Information
Additional Comments
The matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate, 1204583698 (Back SpringMS) and 1204583699 (Back
SpringMSD), aliquots were reduced to conserve sample volume.
Certification Statement
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.
Page 10 of 18 SDG: 514075
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Qualifier Definition Report
for
DNMI001 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Client SDG: 514075 GEL Work Order: 514075
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria ** Analyte is a surrogate compound
U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
ReviewNalidation
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data reviewer. In addition, all CLP-like deliverables
receive a third level review of the fractional data package.
The following data validator verified the information presented in this data report:
Signature: j~ ~ Name: Theresa Austin
Date: 13 JUL 2020 Title: Group Leader
Page 11 of 18 SDG: 514075
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QCSumma rl:'.
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Workorder: 514075
Parmname NOM Sample Qual
Rad Gas Flow
3atch 2013767
QC!204583697 514075005 DUP
Gross Radium Alpha u -0.00212 u
Uncertainty +l-0.191
QC1204583700 LCS
Gross Radium Alpha 570
Uncertainty
QC 1204583696 MB
Gross Radium Alpha u
Uncertainty
QC1204583698 514075005 MS
Gross Radium Alpha 2300 u -0.00212
Uncertainty +l-0.191
QC1204583699 514075005 MSD
Gross Radium Alpha 2300 u -0.00212
Uncertainty +l-0.191
Notes:
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (I-sigma).
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
**
<
>
Analyte is a surrogate compound
Result is less than value reported
Result is greater than value reported
The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product
QC Units
-0.0109 pCilL
+l-0.189
635 pCi/L
+I-7.47
-0.223 pCi/L
+l-0.134
2360 pCilL
+l-28.6
2130 pCi/L
+l-27.3
RPO%
NIA
10.4
A
B
BO
C
D
F
H
K
L
M
For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank.
Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low
Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis
Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample
Estimated Value
Analytical holding time was exceeded
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actual value is expected to be lower.
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low. Actual value is expected to be higher.
M if above MDC and less than LLD
Page 17 of 18 SDG: 514075
Reoort Date: July 13, 2020
REC% Rane Anlst
NIA JXK3
111 (75%-125%)
103 (75%-125%)
92.8 (0%-20%)
Page 1 of
Date Time
07101/20 12:4
07101/20 12:4
07101/20 12:4,
07101/20 12:4
07101/20 12:4
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 514075
Parmname NOM Sam__pJe Qual __ QC Units RPO% __ R_E_C_"A_o __ R_a_nge Anlst
M Matrix Related Failure
NIA RPO or %Recovery limits do not apply.
Nl
ND
NJ
Q
R
u
UI
UJ
UL
X
y
/\
h
See case narrative
Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER.
Sample results are rejected
Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification
Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification
Not considered detected. The associated number is the reported concentration, which may be inaccurate due to a low bias.
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
QC Samples were not spiked with this compound
RPO of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.
Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded
Page 2 of
Date Time
NI A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike cone. by a factor of 4 or more or %RPO not applicable.
I\ The Relative Percent Difference (RPO) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater than
five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of+/-the
RL is used to evaluate the DUP result.
* Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.
For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.
Page 18 of 18 SDG: 514075
TabE
Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
Table E-1 Holding Time Evaluation
Cottonwood Entrance Back Spring West Water Required Holding Time Spring Seep (duplicate of Ruin Spring Seep Ruin Spring)
Carbonate 14 days OK OK OK OK OK
Bicarbonate 14 days OK OK OK OK OK
Calcium 6 months OK OK OK OK OK
Chloride 28 days OK OK OK OK OK
Fluoride 28 days OK OK OK OK OK
Magnesium 6 months OK OK OK OK OK
Nitrogen-Ammonia 28 days OK OK OK OK OK
Nitrogen-Nitrate 28 days OK OK OK OK OK
Potassium 6 months OK OK OK OK OK
Sodium 6 months OK OK OK OK OK
Sulfate 28 days OK OK OK OK OK
pH (s.u.) NIA OK OK OK OK OK
TDS 7 days OK OK OK OK OK
6 months (except
mercury which is 28
Metals days) OK OK OK OK OK
Radiologies 6 months OK OK OK OK OK
VOCS (including THF) 14 days OK OK OK OK OK
* -Corral Spring, and Corral Canyon were all dry and no samples were collected.
E-2 Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check
'.\\\1 ork 0Fcl :r Nw,nhel'hLmri Se1 Jll) tl@e-i!J)l~ 'Femp
2003627 2.0°c
GEL -508151 NIA
AW AL -2006528 0.6°C
GEL-514075 NIA
NI A = These shipments contained samples for the
analysis of Gross Alpha only. Per Table 1 in the
approved QAP, samples submitted for Gross Alpha
analyses do not have a sample temperature requirement.
E-3: Analytical Method Check -Routine Samples
Parameter QAP/Pevmit Method Method Used by Lab
Ammonia ( as N) A4500-NH3 G or E350. l E350.l
Nitrate+ Nitrite (as N) E 353.1 or E353.2 E353.2
Metals E 200.7 or E200.8 E200.7, E200.8
Mercury E200.7 or E200.8 or E245.l E245.l
Gross Alpha E900.0 or E900. l or E903.0 E903.0
voes SW8260B or SW8260C or SW8260D SW8260D
Chloride A4500-Cl B, A4500-Cl E, or E300.0 E300.0
Fluoride A4500-F C or E300.0 E300.0
Sulfate A4500-S04 E or E300.0 E300.0
TDS A2540C A2540C
Carbonate as C03, Bicarbonate as HC03 A2320B A2320B
Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium, Sodium E200.7 E200.7
E-4 Reporting Limit Evaluation
Parameter Permit-Specified RL
Ammonia (as N) 25 mg/L
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 10 mg/L
Metals ug/L
Arsenic 50
Beryllium 4
Cadmium 5
Chromium 100
Cobalt 730
Copper 1300
Iron 11000
Lead 15
Manganese 800
Mercury 2
Molybdenum 40
Nickel 100
Selenium 50
Silver 100
Thallium 2
Tin 17000
Uranium 30
Vanadium 60
Zinc 5000
Gross Alpha 15
VOCsug/L
Acetone 700
Benzene 5
Carbon tetrachloride 5
Chloroform 70
Chloromethane 30
MEK 4000
Methylene Chloride 5
Naphthalene 100
Tetrahydrofuran 46
Toluene 1000
Xylenes 10000
Major Ions mg/L
Chloride l
Fluoride 4
Sulfate 1
TDS 10
Carbonate as C03, Bicarbonate as HC03 Not Specified
Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium, Sodium Not Specified
All analyses were reported to the required RLs unless noted in the text.
E-5: Trip Blank Evaluation
Blank Sample Date Analyte Re.suit {ug/L)
2-Butanone ND
Acetone ND
Benzene ND
Carbon tetrachloride ND
Chloroform ND
2003627 3/25/2020 Chloromethane ND
Methylene chloride ND
Naphthalene ND
Tetrahydrofuran ND
Toluene ND
Xylenes, Total ND
2-Butanone ND
Acetone ND
Benzene ND
Carbon tetrachloride ND
Chloroform ND
2006528 6/16/2020 Chloromethane ND
Methylene chloride ND
Naphthalene ND
Tetrahydrofuran 3.83
Toluene ND
Xylenes, Total ND
E-6 Duplicate Sample Relative Percent Difference
Back Spring
Major Ions (mg/I) Cottonwood Spring (Duplicate of RPD%
Cottonwood Spring)
Carbonate <1.00 <1.00 N/C
Bicarbonate 280 284 1.4
Calcium 120 124 3.3
Chloride 146 147 0.7
Fluoride 0.233 0.240 3.0
Magnesium 32.9 33.7 2.4
Nitrogen-Ammonia <0.0500 <0.0500 N/C
Nitrogen-Nitrate <0.100 <0.100 N/C
Potassium 7.14 7.23 1.3
Sodium 273 282 3.2
Sulfate 417 424 1.7
TDS 860 1280 39.3
Metals (ug/1)
Arsenic <5.0 <5.0 N/C
Beryllium <0.5 <0.5 N/C
Cadmium <0.5 <0.5 NIC
Chromium <25 <25 N/C
Cobalt <10 <10 NIC
Copper <10 <10 N/C
Iron <30 <30 NIC
Lead <1.0 <1.0 N/C
Manganese <10 <10 N/C
Mercury <0.5 <0.5 N/C
Molybdenum <10 <10 N/C
Nickel <20 <20 N/C
Selenium <10 <10 N/C
Silver <10 <10 NIC
Thallium <0.5 <0.5 N/C
Tin <100 <100 N/C
Uranium 10.5 10.7 1.9
Vanadium <15 <15 NIC
Zinc <10 <10 N/C
Radiologies (pCi/1)
Gross Alpha <1.00 <1.00 NIC
voes (ug/L)
Acetone <20.0 <20.0 N/C
Benzene <1.00 <1.00 N/C
Carbon tetrachloride <1.00 <1.00 NIC
Chloroform <1.00 <1.00 N/C
Chloromethane <1.00 <1.00 N/C
MEK <20.0 <20.0 NIC
Methylene Chloride <1.00 <1.00 N/C
E-6 Duplicate Sample Relative Percent Difference
11 Bnek >Ping
M}ljl)11 !funs, (mg,il~ Cottou:wr;iod Sprilng ~uulicate of RFD ~
otrto11~'\lootl Spring)
Naphthalene <1.00 <1.00 N/C
Tetrahydrofuran <1.00 <1.00 N/C
Toluene <1.00 <1.00 N/C
Xylenes <1.00 <1.00 N/C
N/C = Not Calculated
Per Lhe approved QAP, an RPO greater than 20% is acceplable if the reponed results are less
than 5 times the RL. These results are provided for informalion only.
* Duplieate ehec.k repo.-ted for gr-0s alpha minus 'RN and U are not %RPO. ~aleulated values
are based on the fonml.ila in the appr<:>ved OWDP and QA:.P.
RPD exceed. the QAP Umit of20%.
E-7 Radiologies Counting Error
Gress Alpha C0unting
Gi:0s Alpha minu Rn&U Er.r0r·$; Within
Sample ID minu Rn&U PJJecision (±) 20% GWQS GWQS
Gottonwcmd
Spring <1.0 0.209 NIA 15 NIA
EntFance See~ <1.0 0.453 NIA 15 NIA
Back Spring
( auplicate of
Cottonwodd
Spring) <1.0 0.191 NIA 15 NIA
Ruin Spring <1.0 0.231 NIA 15 NIA
Westwater Seep <1.0 0.191 NIA 15 NIA
Westwater Seep <1.0 0.300 NIA 15 NIA
NI A -The sample results are non-detect and the QAP required checks are not applicable.
E-8: Laboratory Matrix QC
Matrix Spike % Recovery Comparison
MS MSO REC RPO
Lab Report Well Analyte %REC %REC Range RPO LIMIT
2003627 Westwater Seep Ammonia (as N) 83.6 67.8 90-110 20 IO
2006528 Westwater Seep Calcium* NC NC 70 -130 NC 20
2006528 Westwater Seep Sodium* NC NC 70 -130 NC 20
2006528 Ruin Spring Ammonia (as N) 80.1 81.6 90-110 1.6 IO
* Recovery was not calculated as the analyte level in the sample was greater than 4 times the spike amount.
Laboratory Duplicate % Recovery Comparison
Lat>
ample Duplieale II
Result Result
LabRegQrt Well Analyte (mg/L) (mg/L) RPil> % RPD Range o/o
2003627 Westwater Seep TDS 1070 1200 11.3 5
Surrogate % Recovery
All surrogate recoveries were within the laboratory established acceptance limits.
Method/Laboratory Reagent Blank detections
All method blank results were within the laboratory established acceptance limits.
TabF
CSV Transmittal
Kathy Weinel
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Dear Mr. Goble,
Kathy Weinel
Thursday, February 11, 2021 11 :08 AM
Phillip Goble
'Dean Henderson'; David Frydenlund; Terry Slade; Logan Shumway; Scott Bakken
Transmittal of CSV Files White Mesa Mill 2020 Annual Seeps and Springs Monitoring
508151.csv; 514075.csv; 2003627-report-EDD.csv; 2006528-report-EDD.csv
Attached to this e-mail are the electronic copies of laboratory results for the annual seeps and springs monitoring
conducted at the White Mesa Mill during 2020, in Comma Separated Value (CSV) format.
Please contact me at 303-389-4134 if you have any questions on this transmittal.
Yours Truly
Kathy Weinel
'eF
-·-Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
Kathy Weinel
Quality Assurance M: nager
t: 303.389.4134 I t: 303.389.4125
225 Union Blvd., Suite 600
Lakewood, CO 80228
http://www.energyfuels.com
This e-mail is intended for the exclusive use of person(s) mentioned as the recipient(s). This message and any attached files with it are confidential and may
contain privileged or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient(s) please delete this message and notify the sender. You may not use, distribute
print or copy this message if you are not the intended recipient(s).
1