DRC-2020-018921 - 0901a06880d8d729

ENERGY FUELS DKC-20 Z0-010 9z
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Blvd. Suite 600
Lakewood, CO, US, 80228
303 974 2140
www.energyfuels.com
biv of Waste Management
and Radiation Control
November 17, 2020
Sent VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
Mr. Ty L. Howard
Director
Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144850
Salt Lake City, UT 84116
NOV 2 0 2020

Re: Transmittal of Annual Tailings System Wastewater Monitoring Report
Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit UGW370004 White Mesa Uranium Mill
Dear Mr. Howard:
Enclosed are two copies of the White Mesa Uranium Mill Annual Tailings System Wastewater
Monitoring Report for 2020 as required by the Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit UGW370004,
as well as two CDs each containing a word searchable electronic copy of the report.
If you should have any questions regarding this report please contact me.
Yours very truly,
Çve
ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC.
Kathy Weinel
Quality Assurance Manager

cc: Scott A. Bakken
Terry Slade
Dave Frydenlund
Logan Shumway
November 17, 2020
Sent VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
Mr. Ty L. Howard
Director
Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144850
Salt Lake City, UT 84116
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Blvd. Suite 600
Lakewood, CO, US, 80228
303 974 2140
www.energyfuel .com
Re: Transmittal of Annual Tailings System Wastewater Monitoring Report
Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit UGW370004 White Mesa Uranium Mill
Dear Mr. Howard:
Enclosed are two copies of the White Mesa Uranium Mill Annual Tailings System Wastewater
Monitoring Report for 2020 as required by the Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit UGW370004,
as well as two CDs each containing a word searchable electronic copy of the report.
If you should have any questions regarding this report please contact me.
Yours very truly,
-!(~iv-~
ENERGY FUEL RESOURCES (USA) INC.
Kathy Weinel
Quality Assurance Manager
cc: Scott A. Bakken
Terry Slade
Dave Frydenlund
Logan Shumway
White Mesa Uranium Mill
2020 Annual Tailings System Wastewater Sampling
Report
State of Utah
Groundwater Discharge Permit No. UGW370004
Prepared by:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Boulevard, Suite 600
Lakewood, CO 80228
November 17, 2020
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1
2.0 SUMMARY OF MILL TAILINGS SYSTEM ACTIVITIES IN 2020 .................................... 1
2.1 Cell 1 ..................................................................................................................................... 1
2.2 Cell 2 ..................................................................................................................................... 2
2.3 Cell 3 ..................................................................................................................................... 2
2.4 Cell 4A .................................................................................................................................. 2
2.5 Cell 4B .................................................................................................................................. 2
3.0 SAMPLING EVENTS AND SAMPLING METHODOLOGY .............................................. 2
3.1 Sampling Events ................................................................................................................... 2
3.2 Field Data .............................................................................................................................. 3
3.3 Sampling Methodology, Equipment and Decontamination Procedures ............................... 3
3.3.1 Cells ............................................................................................................................... 3
3.3.2 Cell 2 Slimes Drain ........................................................................................................ 3
3.3.3 Cell 4A Leak Detection Systems ................................................................................... 4
3.3.4 Cell 4B Leak Detection Systems ................................................................................... 4
3.3.5 Cells 1, 2, 3, ................................................................................................................... 4
3.4 Field QC Samples ................................................................................................................. 4
3.5 Laboratory Results ................................................................................................................ 4
4.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND DATA EVALUATION ....................................................... 5
4.1 Adherence to Sampling Plan and Permit Requirements ....................................................... 5
4.2 Analyte Completeness Review ............................................................................................. 5
4.3 Data Validation ..................................................................................................................... 5
4.3.1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation ....................................................................................... 6
4.3.2 Holding Time Evaluation ............................................................................................... 6
4.3.3 Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check ........................................................................ 6
4.3.4 Analytical Method Check .............................................................................................. 6
4.3.5 Reporting Limit Evaluation ........................................................................................... 7
4.3.6 Trip Blank Evaluation .................................................................................................... 8
4.3.7 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates .................................................................... 8
4.3.8 Radiologic Counting Error ............................................................................................. 9
4.3.9 Laboratory Matrix QC Evaluation ................................................................................. 9
5.0 HISTORIC DATA .................................................................................................................. 11
6.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................... 11
6.1 Cell 1 ................................................................................................................................... 11
6.2 Cell 3 ................................................................................................................................... 11
6.3 Cell 4A ................................................................................................................................ 11
6.4 Cell 4B ................................................................................................................................ 12
6.5 Cell 2 Slimes Drain ............................................................................................................. 13
6.6 Cells 3, 4A and 4B Slimes Drain ........................................................................................ 13
6.7 Cells 1, 2, and 3 Leak Detection Systems ........................................................................... 13
6.8 Cell 4A Leak Detection System .......................................................................................... 13
6.9 Cell 4B Leak Detection System .......................................................................................... 13
6.10 Summary and Conclusions of Analytical Results ............................................................. 14
7 .0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT ....................................................................................... 14
7.1 Assessment of Corrective Actions from Previous Period ................................................... 14
8.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION ................................................................................. 15
11
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Summary of Tailings System Wastewater Monitoring
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Tailings and Slimes Drain Field Sheets
Tab B Sample Location Figures
Tab C Laboratory Analytical Reports
Tab D Chemical and Radiological Summary Tables
Tab E Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
E-1 Holding Time Evaluation
E-2 Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check
E-3 Analytical Method Check
E-4 Reporting Limit Evaluation
E-5 Trip Blank Evaluation
E-6 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
E-7 Radiologic Counting Error
E-8 Laboratory Matrix QC Evaluation
iii
2020 ANNUAL TAILINGS SYSTEM WASTEWATER SAMPLING REPORT
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This is the 2020 Annual Tailings System Wastewater Sampling Report for the Energy Fuels
Resources (USA) Inc. ("EFRI") White Mesa Mill (the "Mill"), as required under Part I.F.9 of the
Mill's State of Utah Groundwater Discharge Permit No. UGW370004 (the "Permit") and Section
6.0 of the Mill's Sampling and Analysis Plan for The Tailings Management System, Leak
Detection Systems and Slimes Drains, Revision: 3.0, dated July 8, 2016 (the "Sampling Plan")
and approved by the State of Utah Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control
("DWMRC") on August 8, 2016.
Cell solution and slimes drain sampling is required under the Sampling Plan and Part I.E.10 of
the Permit to be conducted on an annual basis in August of each year for the solutions in Cells 1,
3, 4A, and 4B, the solutions in the slimes drains in Cells 2, 3, 4A, and 4B (for Cells 3, 4A and 4B
after the commencement of dewatering), the solutions in the leak detection system ("LDS") in
Cell 4A and 4B and any detected solutions in the LDS in Cells 1, 2, and 3 at the time of the
August Sampling event. The results of the sampling event are required to be reported to the
DWMRC with the Mill's Third Quarter Groundwater Monitoring Report due December 1, of
each year.
2.0 SUMMARY OF MILL TAILINGS SYSTEM ACTIVITIES IN 2020
This section provides a brief description of the Mill's tailings management system, and any
changes that were made as a result of Mill activities during the reporting year. A description of
which systems were sampled is provided in Section 3.0.
The Mill is designed not to discharge to groundwater or surface waters. Instead, the Mill tailings
system utilizes tailings and evaporation cells for disposal, evaporation, and management of Mill
tailings, effluents, and other wastes as indicated below:
• Cell 1: dedicated to evaporation of Mill waste solutions;
• Cell 2: contains Mill tailings and has been closed to tailings disposal since 1995 and
l le.(2) byproduct materials since 2000. Cell 2 Phase 1 cover placement commenced in
April 2016;
• Cell 3: contains Mill tailings and is in the final stages of filling. It also accepts other
Mill wastes and 1 le.(2) material from in-situ recovery ("ISR") operations;
• Cell 4A: receives Mill tailings and is used for evaporation of Mill solutions; and
• Cell 4B: is used for evaporation of Mill solutions.
2.1 Cell 1
Cell 1 is a 55-acre impoundment built in June of 1981. It operates as an evaporation pond which
receives solutions only. Cell 1 is equipped with a LDS. In 2020, Cell 1 received fluid from the
Mill process, storm water run-off, and Mill laboratory waste. The LDS in Cell 1 was dry in 2020.
1
2.2 Cell 2
Cell 2 is a 67-acre impoundment built in May of 1980. Cell 2 contains Mill tailings and has been
closed to tailing disposal since 1995 and 1 le.(2) byproduct materials since 2000. Cell 2 Phase 1
cover placement commenced in April 2016. Cell 2 is equipped with a LDS and a slimes drain.
The LDS was dry in 2020. As part of closure activities, EFRI began monitoring the slimes drain
system in 2008. The fluid from the slimes drain is pumped to Cell 4A. Cell 2 no longer receives
any solutions or solids.
2.3 Cell 3
Cell 3 is a 71-acre impoundment built in September 1982. Cell 3 is nearly full of solids. This cell
is equipped with a LDS and a slimes drain. The LDS was dry in 2020 and the slimes drain
system will be monitored once dewatering begin, . In 2020, Cell 3 received solid Mill waste and
solid l le.2 byproduct material from in situ recovery ("ISR") facilities.
2.4 Cell 4A
Cell 4A is a 40-acre impoundment built in 2008. This cell is equipped with a LDS and a slimes
drain. The slimes drain system will be monitored once dewatering begins. The LDS in Cell 4A
was sampled in 2020, as described below. In 2020, Cell 4A received solutions from the Mill
process, and solid tailings sands.
2.5 Cell 4B
Cell 4B is a 40-acre impoundment built in 2011. It operates as an evaporation pond which
receives solutions only. Cell 4B is equipped with a LDS. In 2020, Cell 4B received fluid from
the Mill process. The LDS in Cell 4B wa sampled in 2020, as described below.
3.0 SAMPLING EVENTS AND SAMPLING METHODOLOGY
3.1 Sampling Events
Samples of solutions from Cells 1, 4A, and 4B, the Cell 2 slimes drain and the Cell 4A and Cell
4B LDSs were collected on August 19, 2020. Cell 3 was dry in 2020 and no solution samples
were collected.
In accordance with the Permit, DWMRC was notified of the sampling event, and a DWMRC
representative was present for a part of the sampling. The DWMRC representative collected
split sample aliquots.
Maps showing the locations of the solution and slimes drain and, when applicable, LDS
sampling locations are attached under Tab B. Table 1, included in the Tables Tab, provides an
overview of all solution monitoring samples collected during the current period and includes the
sampling date, laboratory report date, and the work order/lab set ID associated with the analytical
data.
2
The Permit requires that the samples be analyzed for the water quality parameters listed in Table
2 of the Permit and SVOCs.
Additionally, in order to further characterize the radiological constituents and physical properties
of the solution, EFRI conducted voluntary analyses on the August 19, 2020 samples for radium-
226, thorium-228, thorium-230, thorium-232, uranium-233/234, uranium-235/236, uranium-238,
and specific gravity. The additional data from the August 19, 2020 sampling event are included
in separate data tables in Tab D. The gross alpha results have been evaluated and are included as
required. These additional data are included in this report for informational purposes only. EFRI
may or may not choose to continue these analyses in future sampling events.
3.2 Field Data
Attached under Tab A are copies of all of the field data sheets recorded in association with the
annual tailings system monitoring program. Sampling dates are listed in Table 1.
3.3 Sampling Methodology, Equipment and Decontamination Procedures
As noted in the DWMRC-approved Sampling Plan, Revision 3.0, dated July 8, 2016, field
filtering and preservation of metals and gross alpha sample aliquots was not completed due to
safety concerns associated with the filtering apparatus and the backpressure created by the
increased viscosity of these samples. The gross alpha and metals aliquots were filtered and
preserved as necessary by the analytical laboratory. It is important to note that field preservation
of the samples is to preclude biological growth and prevent the inorganic analytes from
precipitating. Based on past field data, the cell solutions and LDS and slimes drain samples are
at a pH of 3.06 or less at the time of collection without additional preservative. The addition of
acidic preservatives in the field would add minimal if any protection from biological growth or
precipitation. The VOC sample aliquots were preserved in the field.
3.3.1 Cells
Cell solution samples were collected as noted above, at the cell sampling stations shown on the
Figures in Tab B, using approved procedures described in the DWMRC-approved Sampling
Plan, Section 3.1.2.
Disposable or dedicated sampling equipment was used during this sampling event and, as such,
rinsate samples were not required.
3.3.2 Cell 2 Slimes Drain
Once a tailings cell has started the dewatering procedures, a sample will be collected from the
slimes drain system. At this time Cell 2 is the only slimes drain that requires sampling. The
location of the slimes drain for Cell 2 is shown in Tab B. While Cells 3, 4A and 4B are equipped
with slimes drain sample locations, Cells 3 and 4A are still active and Cell 4B is being used as an
3
evaporation pond, and the slimes drains will not be pumped (and/or sampled) until dewatering
operations have commenced.
The Cell 2 slimes drain, shown on the Figures in Tab B, was sampled using a disposable bailer as
noted in the DWMRC-approved Sampling Plan, Section 3.1.3.
Due to the use of a disposable bailer, a rinsate sample was not required.
3.3.3 Cell 4A Leak Detection Systems
The Cell 4A LDS sample was collected from the sampling station shown on the Figures in Tab B
using a dedicated stainless steel bucket and ladle as noted in the DWMRC-approved Sampling
Plan, Section 3.2.2.
3.3.4 Cell 4B Leak Detection Systems
The Cell 4B LDS sample was collected from the sampling station shown on the Figures in Tab B
using a dedicated stainless steel bucket and ladle as noted in the DWMRC-approved Sampling
Plan, Section 3.2.2.
3.3.5 Cells 1, 2, 3,
The Cells 1, 2, 3 LDSs were not sampled during the 2020 sampling event because the systems
were dry.
3.4 Field QC Samples
The field Quality Control ("QC") samples generated during this sampling event included one
duplicate and one trip blank per shipment to each laboratory which received samples for VOCs.
The duplicate sample (Cell 65) was submitted blind to the analytical laboratory. As previously
stated, no rinsate blanks were collected during this sampling event as only dedicated or
disposable equipment was used for sample collection.
3.5 Laboratory Results
All analytical results were provided by one of the Mill's two contract analytical laboratories,
GEL Laboratories ("GEL") or Energy Laboratories ("EL").
The laboratories utilized during this investigation were certified under the Environmental Lab
Certification Program administered by the UDEQ Bureau of Lab Improvement for the analyses
they completed.
The analytical data as well as the laboratory Quality Assurance ("QA")/QC summaries are
included under Tab C.
4
4.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND DATA EVALUATION
The Permit requires that the annual tailings system wastewater sampling program be conducted
in compliance with the requirements specified in the Mill's approved White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan ("QAP"), the approved Sampling Plan and the
Permit itself. To meet these requirements, the data validation completed for the tailings system
wastewater sampling program and discussed in this Section utilized the requirements outlined in
the QAP, the Permit and the approved Sampling Plan as necessary. The Mill Quality Assurance
Manager ("QAM") performed a QA/QC review to confirm compliance of the monitoring
program with the requirements of the Permit, the QAP, and the Sampling Plan. As required, data
QA includes preparation and analysis of QC samples in the field, review of field procedures, an
analyte completeness review, and quality control review of laboratory data methods and data.
Identification of field QC samples that were collected and analyzed is provided in Section 3.4
and 4.3.1. Discussion of adherence to the Sampling Plan is provided in Section 4.1. Analytical
completeness review results are provided in Section 4.2. The steps and tests applied to check
laboratory data QA/QC are discussed in Section 4.3.
The analytical laboratories have provided summary reports of the analytical QA/QC
measurements necessary to maintain conformance with National Environmental Laboratory
Accreditation Conference ("NELAC") certification and reporting protocol. The analytical
laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports, including copies of the Chain of Custody forms for each
set of Analytical Results, follow the analytical results under Tab C. Results of review of the
laboratory QA/QC information are provided under Tab E and discussed in Section 4.3, below.
4.1 Adherence to Sampling Plan and Permit Requirements
On a review of adherence by Mill personnel to the QA/QC requirements, the QAM observed that
QA/QC requirements established in the Permit, the QAP, and the Sampling Plan were met, as
discussed below.
4.2 Analyte Completeness Review
All analyses required by the Permit Table 2 were completed. In addition, all cell solution
samples were analyzed for SVOCs as required by the Permit.
It is important to note that the SVOC analyses include Tentatively Identified Compounds
("TICs"). The SVOC compound 4-chlorophenol would be reported in the TIC data list if
detected. 4-chlorophenol was not detected.
4.3 Data Validation
The QAP and the Permit identify the data validation steps and data quality control checks
required for the tailings system wastewater monitoring program. Consistent with these
requirements, the QAM performed the following evaluations: a field data QA/QC evaluation, a
receipt temperature check, a holding time check, an analytical method check, a reporting limit
5
check, a trip blank check, a QA/QC evaluation of sample duplicates, a gross alpha counting error
evaluation and a review of each laboratory's reported QA/QC information. Each evaluation is
discussed in the following sections. Data check tables indicating the results of each test are
provided under Tab E.
4.3.1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation
The QAM performs a review of all field recorded data to assess adherence with QAP, Permit,
and Sampling Plan requirements. The assessment involved review of the Field Data sheets.
Review of the Field Data Sheets noted that all requirements for field data collection were met.
4.3.2 Holding Time Evaluation
QAP Table 1 identifies the method holding times for each suite of parameters. Sample holding
time checks are provided under Tab E. All samples were analyzed within the required holding
time.
It is important to note that pH is analyzed by the laboratory and is not measured in the field
because the acidic nature of the samples requires a more robust meter than what is available for
field use. In most circumstances pH is measured at the time of sample collection and a holding
time is not assessed. If pH is not measured at the time of collection, a 15-minute time limit is
set. EL flagged the pH results with an "H" flag because the pH was measured beyond the 15-
minute limit. This does not affect the usability of the data, as the sample matrices are stable and
pH is collected for informational purposes only and there are no compliance criteria for pH
measurements.
4.3.3 Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check
Chain of Custody sheets were reviewed to confirm compliance with the Permit. Sample receipt
temperature checks are provided under Tab E. All samples were received within the required
temperature limit.
4.3.4 Analytical Method Check
All analytical methods reported by both laboratories were checked against the required methods
specified in Table 1 of the QAP. It is important to note that neither the QAP nor the Permit
specify a method for laboratory pH or conductivity. The QAM verified that the laboratory pH
and conductivity methods used by the laboratory were appropriate and provided accurate data.
Table 1 of the QAP does not specify a method for SVOCs because SVOCs are not routinely
collected in the Mill groundwater samples. The GWDP requires that tailings and slimes drain
samples shall include the SVOCs identified in EPA Method 8270D. The GWDP does not
specify that EPA Method 8270D be used for analysis, only that the compounds specified in that
method be included in the analytical list. All of the SVOCs in the GWDP-specified list were
included in the analytical data however EPA Method 8270B, rather than 8270D, was used to
complete the analyses. The analytical data are included in Tab C.
6
Analytical method check results are provided in Tab E.
4.3.5 Reporting Limit Evaluation
All analytical method reporting limits reported by both laboratories were checked against the
reporting limits specified in the Permit. Section I.E.4 of the Permit requires the following
Reporting Limits:
"all water quality analyses reported shall have a minimum detection limit or reporting limit
that is less than or equal to the respective:
i. Ground Water Quality Standards ("GWQS") concentrations defined in Table 2 of
this Permit,
ii. For TDS, Sulfate, and Chloride, the Minimum Detection Limit for those
constituents for Cell solution monitoring will be as follows: 1,000 mg/L, 1,000 mg/L,
and 1 mg/L, respectively, and
iii. Lower limits of quantitation for groundwater for semi-volatile organic compounds
listed in Table 2 of EPA Method 8270D, Revision 4, dated February, 2007."
Reporting limits are provided in Tab E. There are several constituents that do not have specified
reporting limits in either the Permit or EPA Method 8270D. The reporting limits established by
the laboratory are reported in the data packages. The reporting limits are comparable to other
analytes in the same method based on the same matrix. The reporting limits used by the
laboratory are considered acceptable based on the matrix and known difficulties caused by the
sample matrix.
One metal, two VOCs and all of the SVOCs had reporting limits that exceeded the reporting
limits listed in the permit or the method respectively.
The metal and VOCs that had reporting limits that exceeded the reporting limits are:
• Silver in Cell 4A LDS -2020 reporting limit= 200 ug/L
• Methylene chloride in Cell 2 Slimes -2020 reporting limit = 25 ug/L
• Methylene chloride in Cell 4A LDS -2020 repmting limit= 25 ug/L
The laboratory reported a silver result (150 ug/L) in Cell 4A LDS below the RL. The laboratory
reported the data and qualified the result with a "J". The raised silver RL has no effect on the
usability of the data because the reported concentration of silver in the Cell 4A LDS sample is
above the permit required RL of 100 ug/L.
The Cell 2 slimes drain and Cell 4A LDS samples had methylene chloride RLs above the permit
required RL of 5 ug/L. These exceedances were likely the result of dilutions necessary to
7
address the matrix interferences inherent in these samples. The exceedances do not affect the
quality or usability of the data because the results of this sampling provide an "inventory" of cell
composition and are not used for comparison to regulatory limits.
The reporting limits for the SVOCs exceeded the recommended RLs in Method 8270D. GEL
provided both a method detection limit ("DL") and RL. The DL is based on the sample
composition and other sample-specific variables such as TDS and pH. Method 8270D provides
"recommended" quantitation limits for water samples. The tailings solution matrix is not
comparable to routine groundwater samples and require dilutions to address these matrix
interferences. The laboratory will report detections to the DL and therefore that is the lowest
limit for reporting (i.e. the RL). These RL exceedances were likely the result of dilutions
necessary to address the matrix interferences inherent in these samples. The exceedances do not
affect the quality or usability of the data because the results of this sampling provide an
"inventory" of cell composition and are not used for comparison to regulatory limits.
In addition, several sets of sample results had the reporting limit raised for at least one analyte
due to sample dilution. In all cases the reported value for the analyte was higher than the
increased detection limit.
4.3.6 Trip Blank Evaluation
All trip blank results were reviewed to identify any blank contamination. Trip blank evaluations
are provided in Tab E. All trip blank results associated with the samples were less than the
reporting limit for the VOCs except acetone. Acetone was reported at 5.80 ug/L in the trip
blank.
All of the tailings solution results were more than an order of magnitude greater than the trip
blank acetone result. The data are usable for the intended purpose because trip blank detection is
indicative of a high bias to the sample results. A high bias results in a more conservative data
application. EFRI does not believe the data quality has been affected.
4.3.7 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
Section 9.1.4 a) of the QAP states that the relative percent difference (the "RPD") will be
calculated for the comparison of duplicate and original field samples. The QAP acceptance limits
for RPDs between the duplicate and original field sample is less than or equal to 20% unless the
measured results are less than 5 times the required detection limit. This standard is based on the
EPA Contract Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review,
February 1994, 9240.1-05-01 as cited in the QAP. The RPDs are calculated for all duplicate
pairs for all analytes regardless of whether or not the reported concentrations are greater than 5
times the required detection limits; however, data will be considered noncompliant only when
the results are greater than 5 times the required detection limit and the RPD is greater than 20%.
RPDs are also only calculated when both the sample and the duplicate report a detection for any
given analyte. If only one of the pair reports a detection the RPD cannot be calculated. The
additional duplicate information is provided for information purposes.
8
All duplicate results were within 20% RPD. Results of the RPD test are provided under Tab E.
The radiologic duplicates are discussed in Section 4.3.8 below.
4.3.8 Radiologic Counting Error
Section 9.14 of the QAP requires that all gross alpha analysis reported with an activity equal to
or greater than the Groundwater Compliance Limit (the "GWCL") (for the tailings system
wastewater samples the GWQS will be used), shall have a counting variance that is equal to or
less than 20% of the reported activity concentration. An error term may be greater than 20% of
the reported activity concentration when the sum of the activity concentration and error term is
less than or equal to the GWQS.
Results of routine radiologic sample QC are provided under Tab E. All tailings system
wastewater radiologic sample results met the counting error requirement.
Section 9.1.4 of the QAP also requires a comparability check between the sample and field
duplicate sample results utilizing the formula provided below:
The original and duplicate sample met the duplicate comparability check specified in the QAP
for gross alpha. Results of the RPD test are provided under Tab E.
4.3.9 Laboratory Matrix QC Evaluation
Section 9.2 of the QAP requires that the laboratory's QA/QC Manager check the following items
in developing data reports: (1) sample preparation information is correct and complete, (2)
analysis information is correct and complete, (3) appropriate analytical laboratory procedures are
followed, (4) analytical results are correct and complete, (5) QC samples are within established
control limits, (6) blanks are within QC limits, (7) special sample preparation and analytical
requirements have been met, and (8) documentation is complete. In addition to other laboratory
checks described above, EFRI's QAM rechecks QC samples and blanks (items (5) and (6)) to
confirm that the percent recovery for spikes and the relative percent difference for spike
duplicates are within the method-specific required limits, or that the case narrative sufficiently
explains any deviation from these limits. Results of this quantitative check are provided under
Tab E. All lab QA/QC results from both EL and GEL met these requirements. There were QC
results which did not meet laboratory established acceptance limits, as identified in Tab E and
described below.
A significant number of the tailings system wastewater samples had the RL raised for multiple
analytes due to matrix interference and/or sample dilution. RL evaluations are discussed in
Section 4.3.5.
9
The check samples included at least the following: a method blank, a laboratory control spike
("LCS"), a matrix spike ("MS") and a matrix spike duplicate ("MSD"), or the equivalent, where
applicable.
All qualifiers, and the corresponding explanations reported in the QA/QC Summary Reports for
any of the check samples for any of the analytical methods were reviewed by the QAM.
The QAP Section 8.1.2 requires that a MS/MSD pair be analyzed with each analytical batch,
depending upon the analytical method requirements and/or method limitations. The QAP does
not specify acceptance limits for the MS/MSD pair, and the QAP does not specify that the
MS/MSD pair be prepared on EFRI samples only. Acceptance limits for MS/MSDs are set by
the laboratories. The review of the information provided by the laboratories in the data packages
verified that the QAP requirement to analyze a MS/MSD pair with each analytical batch was
met. While the QAP does not require it, the recoveries were reviewed for compliance with the
laboratory established acceptance limits. The QAP does not require this level of review, and the
results of this review are provided for information only.
The information from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports indicates that the MS/MSDs
recoveries and the associated RPDs for the samples were within acceptable laboratory limits
except as indicated in Tab E. The data recoveries and RPDs which are outside the laboratory
established acceptance limits do not affect the quality or usability of the data because the
recoveries and RPDs above or below the acceptance limits are indicative of matrix interference
most likely caused by other constituents in the samples. Matrix interferences are applicable to
the individual sample results only. The requirement in the QAP to analyze a MS/MSD pair with
each analytical batch was met and as such the data are compliant with the QAP.
The QAP specifies that surrogate compounds shall be employed for all organic analyses, but the
QAP does not specify acceptance limits for surrogate recoveries. The analytical data associated
with the routine quarterly sampling met the requirement specified in the QAP. The information
from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports indicates that the surrogate recoveries for the
samples were within acceptable laboratory limits for the surrogate compounds. The requirement
in the QAP to analyze surrogate compounds was met and the data are compliant with the QAP.
Furthermore, there are no QAP requirements for surrogate recoveries.
The information from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports indicates that the LCS/LCSD
recoveries for the samples were within acceptable laboratory limits for all LCS/LCSD
compounds except as noted in Tab E. The compounds noted with LCS/LCSD recoveries outside
of acceptance limits are noted for low recovery and the surrogate recoveries associated with the
LCS/LCSD indicate that the analytical system was operating within acceptable limits and the
data are acceptable as reported and there is no effect on the usability of the data.
The QAP, Section 8.1.2 requires that each analytical batch shall be accompanied by a method
blank. The analytical batches routinely contain a blank, which is a blank sample made and
carried through all analytical steps. For the Mill samples, a method blank was prepared for the
analytical methods. Per the approved QAP, contamination detected in analysis of method blanks
will be used to evaluate any analytical laboratory contamination of environmental samples. The
10
QAP states that non-conformance conditions will exist when contaminant levels in the
samples(s) are not an order of magnitude greater than the blank result. There were no detections
in the method blanks in this quarter. Method blank results are included in Tab E.
5.0 HISTORIC DATA
The historic analytical data for the tailings system wastewater sampling program are included in
Tab D. In addition, the minimum and maximum concentrations compiled in the DWMRC
GWDP, Statement of Basis for a Uranium Mining Facility at White Mesa, South of Blanding,
Utah, dated December 1, 2004 are included in Tab D.
6.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
6.1 Cell 1
Cell 1 solutions were acidic in nature with a laboratory pH of 0.92. As expected, the solutions
contained gross alpha, major ions, metals, and Volatile Organic Compounds ("VOCs"). SVOCs
were not detected. Regarding major ions, chloride, fluoride, magnesium, ammonia, potassium,
sodium and sulfate were one or more orders of magnitude greater in concentration than the other
major ions. Metals exhibiting the greatest concentration by at least one order of magnitude
higher than the other metals analyzed included arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt,
copper, iron, lead, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, selenium, silver, tin, uranium, vanadium
and zinc. A decrease was noted in the gross alpha concentration in the August 2020 sample. The
variable gross alpha results are being caused by matrix interference due to the nature of the
tailings solution and are not representative of gross alpha from radium concentrations in the
solution. This is evidenced by the results of the voluntary additional analyses. The results of the
voluntary analyses are shown in Tab D.
The concentrations reported in the 2020 sample remained within historic ranges. It is important
to note that not all constituents present in the tailings fluids will exhibit the same behavior as a
result of concentration of the tailings fluids and any increases or decreases in constituent results
will not be linear. The individual constituent results are greatly affected by the matrix of the
tailings fluids and each constituent will behave differently based on the matrix interactions and
the differing solubility properties of the constituent.
Comparison of Cell 1 fluids to those of Cells 4A, and 4B reveals that Cell 1 1s similar in
composition and concentration ratios to the fluids in Cells 4A and 4B.
6.2 Cell 3
Cell 3 was dry in 2020 and was therefore not sampled.
6.3 Cell 4A
Cell 4A solutions were acidic in nature, with a laboratory pH of 2.36. As expected, the solutions
contained gross alpha, major ions, metals, and VOCs. SVOCs were not detected. Cell 4A fluid
11
exhibited the highest major ion concentrations for chloride, fluoride, magnesium, ammonia,
potassium, sodium and sulfate. The metals arsenic, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron,
lead, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, selenium, uranium, vanadium and zinc were one or more
orders of magnitude greater than the other metals analyzed. A decrease in the gross alpha
concentration was noted in the 2020 sample. The variable and decreased gross alpha results are
being caused by matrix interference due to the nature of the tailings solution and are not
representative of gross alpha from radium concentrations in the solution. This is evidenced by
the results of the voluntary additional analyses which are shown in Tab D.
Overall, the concentrations reported in the 2020 sample remained approximately the same as the
2019 sample. Concentration changes noted are within the analytical accuracy of the methods
used for analysis. It is important to note that not all constituents present in the tailings fluids
will exhibit the same behavior as a result of concentration of the tailings fluids and the increases
in constituent results will not be linear. The individual constituent results are greatly affected by
the matrix of the tailings fluids and each constituent will behave differently based on the matrix
interactions and the differing solubility properties of the constituent.
Comparison of Cell 4A fluids to those of Cells 1, and 4B reveals that Cell 4A is similar in
composition and concentration ratios to the fluids in Cells 1, and 4B.
6.4 Cell 4B
Cell 4B solutions were acidic in nature, with a laboratory pH of 2.24. As expected, the solutions
contained gross alpha, major ions, metals and VOCs. SVOCs were not detected. Cell 4B fluid
exhibited the highest major ion concentrations for chloride, fluoride, magnesium, ammonia,
potassium, sodium and sulfate. The metals arsenic, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron,
lead, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, selenium, uranium, vanadium and zinc were one or more
orders of magnitude greater than the other metals analyzed. A decrease in the gross alpha
concentration was noted in the 2020 sample. The variable gross alpha results are being caused by
matrix interference due to the nature of the tailings solution and are not representative of gross
alpha from radium concentrations in the solution. This is evidenced by the results of the
voluntary additional analyses which are shown in Tab D.
The concentrations reported in the 2020 sample remained approximately the same as the 2019
sample. Concentration changes noted are within the analytical accuracy of the methods used for
analysis. It is important to note that not all constituents present in the tailings fluids will exhibit
the same behavior as a result of concentration of the tailings fluids and the increases in
constituent results will not be linear. The individual constituent results are greatly affected by
the matrix of the tailings fluids and each constituent will behave differently based on the matrix
interactions and the differing solubility properties of the constituent.
Comparison of Cell 4B fluids to those of Cells 1, and 4A reveals that Cell 4B is similar in
composition and concentration ratios to the fluids in Cells 1, and 4A.
12
6.5 Cell 2 Slimes Drain
Cell 2 Slimes drain fluid was acidic in nature, with a laboratory pH of 3.06. As expected, the
solutions contained gross alpha, major ions, metals, and VOCs. No SVOCs were detected.
Major ions that were highest in concentration by one or more orders of magnitude included
chloride, magnesium, ammonia, sodium and sulfate. For metals, arsenic, cadmium, chromium,
cobalt, copper, iron, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, selenium, thallium, uranium, vanadium
and zinc were at least one order of magnitude greater in concentration than other metals
analyzed. A slight decrease in the gross alpha concentration was noted in the 2020 sample. The
gross alpha result decreased but is the same order of magnitude of the historic data. Overall, the
concentrations reported in the 2020 sample remained approximately the same as the 2019
sample. Concentration changes noted are within the analytical accuracy of the methods used for
analysis.
6.6 Cells 3, 4A and 4B Slimes Drain
In accordance with the Permit, the slimes drains for Cell 3, 4A and 4B are not required to be
sampled until dewatering operations have begun. Cell 1 was designed to be used solely as an
evaporation pond and does not have a slimes drain.
6.7 Cells 1, 2, and 3 Leak Detection Systems
Consistent with the Permit, the Cells 1, 2, and 3 LDSs were not sampled during the 2020
sampling event. The Cells 1, 2, and 3 LDSs were dry.
6.8 Cell 4A Leak Detection System
Cell 4A LDS solutions were acidic in nature, with a laboratory pH of 2.39. As expected, the
solutions contained gross alpha, major ions, metals and VOCs. No SVOCs were detected. Cell
4A LDS fluid exhibited the highest major ion concentrations for chloride, magnesium, ammonia,
sodium, and sulfate. The metals arsenic, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, manganese,
molybdenum, nickel, selenium, uranium, vanadium, and zinc were one or more orders of
magnitude greater than the other metals analyzed. A decrease in the gross alpha concentration
was noted in the 2020 sample. The variable gross alpha results are being caused by matrix
interference due to the nature of the tailings solution and are not representative of gross alpha
from radium concentrations in the solution. This is evidenced by the results of the voluntary
additional analyses which are shown in Tab D.
Overall, the concentrations reported in the 2020 Cell 4A LDS sample remained within historic
ranges.
6.9 Cell 4B Leak Detection System
Cell 4B LDS solutions were acidic in nature, with a laboratory pH of 1.89. As expected, the
solutions contained gross alpha, major ions, metals, VOCs. No SVOCs were detected. Cell 4B
13
LDS fluid exhibited the highest major ion concentrations for chloride, fluoride, magnesium,
ammonia, potassium, sodium, and sulfate. The metals arsenic, cadmium, chromium, cobalt,
copper, iron, lead, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, selenium, uranium, vanadium and zinc were
one or more orders of magnitude greater than the other metals analyzed. A decrease in the gross
alpha concentration was noted in the 2020 sample. The variable gross alpha results are being
caused by matrix interference due to the nature of the tailings solution and are not representative
of gross alpha from radium concentrations in the solution. This is evidenced by the results of the
voluntary additional analyses which are shown in Tab D.
Overall, the concentrations reported in the 2020 Cell 4B LDS sample are within historic ranges.
6.10 Summary and Conclusions of Analytical Results
The metals arsenic, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, manganese, molybdenum, nickel,
selenium, uranium, vanadium and zinc were generally present in greatest concentration for all
samples. For major ions, chloride, fluoride, magnesium, ammonia, sodium, and sulfate were
predominant. Both increases and decreases were noted for several metals and major anions.
Concentrations are variable and are driven by Mill operations. EFRI conducted additional
volunt~ry analyses (not required by the GWDP) in order to further characterize the radiological
and physical properties of the tailings solution, as discussed Section 3.1 above. The results of the
additional voluntary analyses for radium-226, thorium-228, thorium-230, thorium-232, uranium-
233/234, uranium-235/236, uranium-238, and specific gravity show that the variability in gross
alpha results are being caused by matrix interference due to the nature of the tailings solution and
are not representative of gross alpha from radium concentrations in the solution. EFRI may or
may not choose to continue these additional analyses in the future. The changes in
concentrations of metals and major ions are reflective of Mill operations and are driven by the
addition/movement of fluids during periods of operation. The individual constituent results are
greatly affected by the matrix of the tailings fluids and each constituent will behave differently
based on the matrix interactions and the differing solubility properties of the constituent. Overall,
the results of the 2020 tailings solutions are within historic, expected ranges.
7.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT
No corrective action reports are required for the 2020 annual sampling event.
7 .1 Assessment of Corrective Actions from Previous Period
No corrective action reports were required for the 2019 annual sampling event and as such there
is no assessment of previous actions necessary.
14
8.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION
This document was prepared by Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
By:
Scott Bakken, Digitally signed by Scott Bakken
'E>ate: 2020.11.17 14:27:08 -07'00'
Scott A. Bakken Date
Vice President, Regulatory Affairs
15
Certification:
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared
under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified
personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the
person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,
and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Scott Bakken' Digitally signed by Scott Bakken
Date: 2020.11.17 14:27:29 -07'00'
Scott A. Bakken
Vice President, Regulatory Affairs
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
16
TABLES
Table 1
Summary of Tailings System Wastewater Monitoring
Location Sample Date
Cell 1 Solutions 8/19/2020
Cell 2 Slimes Drain 8/19/2020
Cell 3 Solutions 8/19/2020
Cell 4A Solutions 8/19/2020
Cell4ALDS 8/19/2020
Cell 4B Solutions 8/19/2020
Cell 4B LDS 8/19/2020
Cell 65 -Duplicate of 8/19/2020 Cell 1
Notes:
GEL = GEL Laboratories, LLC
EL = Energy Labs
Date of Laboratory Report Work Order Number/Lab Set ID
GEL-09/30/2020 GEL-519405
EL -9/9/2020 EL -C20080962
GEL-09/30/2020 GEL-519405
EL -9/9/2020 EL -C20080962
Not Sampled -Dry NA
Not Sampled -Dry NA
GEL-09/30/2020 GEL-519405
EL -9/9/2020 EL -C20080962
GEL-09/30/2020 GEL-519405
EL -9/9/2020 EL -C20080962
GEL-09/30/2020 GEL-519405
EL -9/9/2020 EL -C20080962
GEL-09/30/2020 GEL-519405
EL -9/9/2020 EL -C20080962
GEL-09/30/2020 GEL-519405
EL -9/9/2020 EL -C20080962
*EFRI conducted the annual sampling event in August 2020. EFRI collected additional samples aliquots for specific
gravity and additional radiological constituents.
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Tailings System Monitoring Field Sheets
Tab B Sample Location Figures
Tab C Laboratory Analytical Reports
Tab D Chemical and Radiological Summary Tables
Tab E Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
E-1 Holding Time Evaluation
E-2 Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check
E-3 Analytical Method Check
E-4 Reporting Limit Evaluation
E-5 Trip Blank Evaluation
E-6 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
E-7 Radiologic Counting Error
E-8 Laboratory Matrix QC Evaluation
Tab A
Tailings System Monitoring Field Sheets
Field Data Record-Tailings Solutions, LDS and Slimes Orain Sampling
Is this a Slimes Drain?
If this is a Slimes Drain, measure depth to wastewater immediately before sampling.
DTW immediately before sampling (slimes only):_._;v._'/._lj ________ _
Weather Conditions at Time of Sampling:--=5;...;;;...,=o=n~"r---------------
Analytical Parameters/Sample Collection Method:
voes
Metals
Nutrients
Other Non
Radi0Io2ics
Gross Alpha
SVOCs
Conductivity
!Sil Yes
Ill Yes
f¥J Yes
Ill Yes
~ Yes
IJI Yes
~ Yes
oNo oYes 1j1 No
D No D Yes !JI No
D No D Yes 111 No
oNo DYes r, No
D No D Yes ~No
oNo oYes ijl No
ONO oYes f¥ No
QC Samples Associated with this Location:
D ·runsate Blank
o Duplicate
D D
D D
D D
D D
D D
0 D
0 D
Duplicate Sample Name:. __________ _
r;Lali
·"' YN~w.e
,, ~ ., ....
v-El..
(rE.L
Notes: A,rivea on ~i+~ I).+ O f<b'S. s,.wi ple ~ c.oll~c.+c:J. \.u.-th °' lo-Jl~ A+ C>B30 ..
Le.il ~,~e "'-i Q8'i'f .
Field Data Record-Tailings Solutions, LDS and Slimes Drain Sampling
C.el\ l 5, 1:M~~
Location: ~l~mG '*11 SamplingPersonnel:-1';.r"t'.le< HolJiA~. Deef'I 1..$'"'A"
~ Yes O No Oe~~ He ,,Jersa"' lDWMRC.) Is this a Slimes Drain?
If this is a Slimes Drain, measure depth to wastewater immediately before sampling.
DTW immediately before sampling (slimes only):_""""'3~'1~· &={( ______ _
Weather Conditions at Time of Sampling:. __ ;;_ ..... _n"'_:'.J,......_ ___________ _
Analytical Parameters/Sample Collection Method:
voes
Metals
Nutrients
Other Non
Radiologies
Gross Alpha
SVOCs
Conductivity
Ell Yes
ill Yes
$ Yes
ijl Yes
~ Yes
Ill Yes
CB-Yes
oNo oYes ISZI No
oNo DYes IE No
oNo oYes ~No
oNo D Yes ~No
oNo D Yes Iii No
oNo D Yes LJ1 No
oNo oYes [!I No
QC Samples Associated with this Location:
o Rinsate Blank
o Duplicate
D Isa
D ~
D
D 111
D
D
D
Duplicate Sample Name: __________ _
D &EL
D
D
D
D &EL
D (.,.J:L
D
Notes: A<rivel op ~~+e. o • .t ogi:1.5 , ..s-.,....pl~~ b111;}ea e--,A t;.olle.c.+c:J. !4t <>85o ,
Le:\3 ~,re o-1 O~DQ.
Field Data Record-Tailings Solutions, LDS and Slimes Drain Sampling
Location: C el l '-iA
Is this a Slimes Drain?
If this is a Slimes Drain, measure depth to wastewater immediately before sampling.
DTW immediately before sampling (slimes only):,--L:.tv,~%'...:...A.,___ _______ _
Weather Conditions at Time of Sampling:,---=S;..;:"'ll.Jt'lLUltl~'!I--------------
Analytical Parameters/Sample Collection Method:
-p.~r~t(~r · . ·· . r T~k( ·· '~Ji!~--:: . ,S,~-yn,p -.~ . 4 ~J.1 .. ~ · .. · ' : ,;; . ! . 1' .• : . ,_. ~ ·{ ., ... ":, ..-:·:.': '.: .. J r. ·~ • ';f • ,_:;
!,•
voes !Sil Yes DNo oYes fil No
Metals IE Yes oNo o Yes !JI No
Nutrients f¥J Yes oNo oYes 1!1 No
Other Non Iii Yes oNo oYes ~No
Radiolo9:ics
Gross Alpha 6iJ Yes ONO oYes lll No
SVOCs [j Yes oNo oYes lll No
Conductivity ~Yes oNo oYes &l No
QC Samples Associated with this Location:
D Rinsate Blank
D Duplicate
:· v, ··. ·. · :·Samiiiiiii!.M -'th ·4 .", , .,', , r. _, .. " . c l~ 0 , , < ~Peµ,'j'ffittlt: ~-Biil~i·('\ -:.,~~, .. ;.· t a'iflf
.... l ·., •.• ·1 ••. '1L :.·. • ----'P.giQr, . : .. . .
D D ~
D D Ci
D D I'll
D D 1!I
D D II
0 D (!I
0 D ~
Duplicate Sample Name:. __________ _
" \1lJa~. , .
'Naibe .
•""' f'" • I
,
6-EL
i:'lfl ... f'I'• u
~-'U :t1,ra \.l
~
f"ler~~
(r E. L.
f1' E. L
~ nen\'-.t
\J,_)
No~Aff;y,AY' ~,-+('. ..... + 090K . ~,..,..,ples. c.otli!L+e J. w;#,"" lq.J.J<. A+ oqL5. ·
L.~ s_tte ~ D'1.J8 .
Field Data Record-Tailings Solutions, LDS and Slimes Drain Sampling
Location: Cc.11 'iA 1-.D.S Sampling Personnel: :1ia.nncr 1-t. 11,,k't, Df!et'l L~m°"'
D~o..n ~c.,tJ.erso\>\ ( ot,,)M R.c..) Is this a Slimes Drain? D Yes ll9 No
If this is a Slimes Drain, measure depth to wastewater immediately before sampling.
DTW immediately before sampling (slimes only):,__._Mc.-,.'f.c..c.it\...__ _______ _
Weather Conditions at Time of Sampling:.---=S"'-'"'"""o ..... n""~-------------
Analytical Parameters/Sample Collection Method:
voes
Metals
Nutrients
Other Non
Radiologies
Gross Alpha
SVOCs
Conductivity
!Sil Yes
Ill Yes
ijl Yes
Ill Yes
ijJ Yes
131 Yes
~Yes
Fil~t~d .· :,,, ..
oNo oYes [ij No
oNo oYes !JI No
DNo oYes l!l No
oNo oYes c,i No
oNo oYes ~No
oNo D Yes l!l No
oNo oYes (¥No
QC Samples ~ssoclated with this Location:
o Rinsate Blank
o Duplicate
D D
D D
D 0
0 D
0 0
D D
0 0
Duplicate Sample Name:, __________ _
6-EL
r,. EL
Field Data Record-Tailings Solutions, LDS and Slimes Drain Sampling
Location: Cc. I I L.f B
Is this a Slimes Drain?
Sampling Personnel: 1'.'o,ntu!r Hco n;,k~, D-eet) L~n,OA
Dc.o." He." O.Gf:So ( 0 &..'>i'\ R,C.) o Yes ll9 No
If this is a Slimes Drain, measure depth to wastewater immediately before sampling.
DTW immediately before sampling (slimes only):----"-'M'-1-Z:-'-~..__ _______ _
Weather Conditions at Time of Sampling:.--=.S:..:"i:wOl!.I.Jt)o~-------------
Analytical Parameters/Sample Collection Method :
P.3taineter
.·~:: .. r',t. -:1·)/ . Sa'nip)e T:ake_n .. : : .. -~· .... :~· ': .... . . ·; '.' :..
'.Filterea· .
~J • ;'·;;~ •• ~, ··.··~1-#:
' , ..
voes !'\ii Yes DNo o Yes !ii1 No
Metals Ill Yes oNo oYes !JI No
Nutrients ijl Yes oNo oYes 1!1 No
Other Non Ill Yes oNo oYes c, No
Radiolo~ics
Gross Alpha ij Yes oNo D Yes Ill No
SVOCs [jJ Yes DNo oYes [:fl No
Conductivity NJ Yes oNo oYes ~No
QC Samples Associated with this Location:
o ·Rinsate Blank
D Duplicate
·• *""" • .:_ ;S.~biinrl_'.&.lithod. ~ ·: .... ' ' .( : . ... .
·:Pej1'>'Q1tit· tt.i)illif ·~. . / \, ,-.. ·IJ;t_lll~· ... J§ .. , -· -~ ····-··-,:-~ . PiJmn ' ·'
D 0 [ii
D D [J
D D ~
D D !!I
D D !JI
D D ~
D D ill
Duplicate Sample Name:. __________ _
Notes:
L-e,.
,. .,.U.-),,.
Name .. .. • t •
6-EL
i:: ....... f''• u
~.A~-:tl
~-
f.11er~"\
(rE.L
r,.E.L
~ 11erA\J
'lJ
Field Data Record· Tailings Solutions, LDS and Slimes Drain Sampling
Location: C.c.11 LIB !..PS Sampling Personnel: ::fl!onocr ~oJl;J.o.~. O~e" L.::,mer.n
De.~" J.lc."\ o.er:so',\i ( oc..,"4. A.C.) Is this a Slimes Drain? D Yes 09 No
If this is a Slimes Drain, measure depth to wastewater immediately before sampling.
DTW immediately before sampling (slimes only):--<.;t'!,:...o.'f...:....A.___ _______ _
Weather Conditions at Time of Sampling:.--=S'-""'=o ..... n~,,,__ ____________ _
Analytical Parameters/Sample Collection Method:
Pfl]anieter Sam'pte Takt ··, .:,u, .. ~ .. -..... #i':·. ~. )P,-~ ... ~. ,,· •.. <l'J:: ,I ,. ' •• .... ,·, ,. . . :-·. . . . ·:~~) . ). ,' .:: H 0 .. I .. ,t . I,•
voes !Sil Yes oNo oYes ~No
Metals Ill Yes DNo DYes II No
Nutrients ij Yes DNo oYes IJl No
Other Non Iii Yes oNo oYes c, No
Radiologies
Gross Alpha ij Yes oNo oYes ijl No
SVOCs ~ Yes oNo DYes l!l No
Conductivity Ill Yes oNo oYes 51 No
QC Samples Associated with this Location:
D Rinsate Blank
o Duplicate
¥,' :s~timifM 1· d . .. ...... -. . · ... .. .. . .e.bQ. .... ... ·p~·-~\ ~ti~ :-IJij~l~J ~: ""°YF J; aj. . :~=6"· ,. .. .. _a, ~. .
·.!:" •••
D D Iii
0 D [j
D D ~
D D !JI
D D !JI
D D ijJ
D D Ill
Duplicate Sample Name:. __________ _
,J;a).; •• t' ••• ..y-·N~~e-•'
6-El..
s::,,,~f'h ....
~ .... r:'cl
~
ft1er'~"\
(,. E. L
f,.EL
fnerd...a
'-U
Field Data Record-Tailings Solutions, LDS and Slimes Drain Sampling
Location: Cc.11 f..5
Is this a Slimes Drain?
If this is a Slimes Drain, measure depth to wastewater immediately before sampling.
DTW immediately before sampling (slimes only):.~;v.;..,,,Z,....;..:4...._ _______ _
Weather Conditions at Time of Sampling:.--=5'""".,.....,n..,,.n~.,..._-------------
Analytical Parameters/Sample Collection Method:
voes
Metals
Nutrients
Other Non
RadioloJ:rics
Gross Alpha
SVOCs
Conductivity
!Sil Yes
Ill Yes
ij Yes
Iii Yes
ij Yes
(Jl Yes
a, Yes
oNo oYes 191 No
ONO oYes ~No
oNo oYes lJJ No
ONo oYes ~No
DNo oYes ~No
oNa oYes rfJ No
oNo oYes ii No
QC Samples Associated with this Location:
D Rinsate Blank
0§ Duplicate
0 D
D D
0 D
D D
0 D
D D
0 D
Duplicate Sample Name:. __________ _
6-EL
IYJ
Notes: Arri vr& oo ~t'-tc o.+ O'tOI{. s""~ple s. c.ollcc..+eJ. w ;~ ~ L,.A1c:. o.+ ()~L5 ·
Le fi ~ Ct~ o-t O<J.18 .
TabB
Sample Location Figures
1 C:
{
E r i
MW-02 •
32
MW-03 •
II
II
(I
~
CELL 1
MW-17 •
MW-27 •
CELL 2
33
PIEZ-2 •
PIEZ-3 •
M •26 TW4-1cfl1W4•9 o OTW4-3 OTW4·12
0TW4·1(brw4-11 C1W4-13
TW4-~-8
OTW4•1
PIEZ•S •
OTW4-40TW4·14
01W4·6
t _____________________________________ ___
;,;
i!! 1:
I f 0 -1,«IO'
I IICl!U:,.. ,.-
.. Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
White M888 MIii
San Juan Utah
": TJ7S, R22E
.Aulhol: ----
Annual TaHlnga Syatem,
Cell Solution
Sample Locations
'11 24 15
• I:: lil
'i if
r ~ ~ ::, l
t I
.!! ~
1 " t g, Ii! :I
II, ~ ~ f :I ~ :i I ! / ~ ,.
~ c',!
~1
MW•OZ •
MW•2 •
32
MW-03 •
0 IOO' l,IICIII'
ICIM.i: 1" • 1,000'
CELL 1
LEAK
DETECTION
SAMPLE
LOCATION
MW-17 •
MW•27 ...
CELL 2
33
PIEZ•2 •
PIEZ-3 •
M ·28 TW4•1tfJIW4•0
O OTW4•3 CTW4•12
OTW4•1lbrw4-11 OTW4·13
TW4-,._8
OTW4•1
OTW4"'mw4.14
OTW4-6
PIEZ-5 •
., Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
White Maaa Mill
San Juan : utah
in: T37S, R22E
Annual Talllngs System
Slimes and Leak Detection
Sample Locations
Author: ___ _ Ill: 11 24 15
TabC
Laboratory Analytical Reports
EN:RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data.
www.energylab.com
Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515
Gillette, WY 866.686. 7175 • Helena, MT 877 .472.0711
LABO RA TORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Report Date: 09/09/20
Project: Annual Tailings 2020 Collection Date: 08/19/20 08:30
Lab ID: C20080962-001 DateReceived: 08/21/20
Client Sample ID: Cell 1 Matrix: Aqueous
MCL/
Analyses Result Units Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date / By
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03 ND mg/L 5 A2320 B 08/24/20 20: 18 / dmb
Bicarbonate as HC03 ND mg/L 5 A2320 B 08/24/20 20: 18 / dmb
Chloride 40000 mg/L D 100 E300.0 08/24/20 18: 13 / dmb
Fluoride 7460 mg/L D 100 A4500-F C 08/24/20 11 :43 / dmb
Sulfate 222000 mg/L D 400 E300.0 08/24/20 18: 13 / dmb
Calcium 618 mg/L D 30 E200.7 08/24/20 15:33 / meh
Magnesium 12300 mg/L E200.7 08/24/20 15:33 / meh
Potassium 4580 mg/L D 20 E200.7 08/24/20 15:33 / meh
Sodium 62900 mg/L D 50 E200.7 08/24/20 15:33 / meh
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Conductivity@ 25 C 81500 umhos/cm E 5 A2510 B 08/21/20 13:54 / kjp
pH 0.92 s.u. H 0.01 A4500-H B 08/21/20 13:54 / kjp
pH Measurement Temp 13 ·c A4500-H B 08/21/20 13:54 / kjp
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS@ 180 C 422000 mg/L D 5000 A2540 C 08/24/20 14:34 / kjp
NUTRIENTS
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 191 mg/L D 0.5 E353.2 08/24/20 16:21 / dmb
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 10600 mg/L D 1000 E350.1 08/26/20 09:55 I hat
METALS, DISSOLVED
Arsenic 599000 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08/25/20 18:44 I jcg
Beryllium 1330 ug/L D 30 E200.8 09/01/20 22:19 / jcg
Cadmium 9070 ug/L D 10 E200.8 08/25/20 12:42 I jcg
Chromium 25700 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08/25/20 12:42 I jcg
Cobalt 51400 ug/L D 10 E200.8 08/25/20 12:42 I jcg
Copper 2110000 ug/L D 1000 E200.8 08/25/20 18:44 / jcg
Iron 1.54E+07 ug/L D 5000 E200.8 08/25/20 18:44 I jcg
Lead 42400 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08/25/20 18:44 I jcg
Manganese 833000 ug/L D 100 E200.7 08/24/20 15:33 / meh
Mercury 14 ug/L 1 E245.1 09/03/20 12:20 I eet-d
Molybdenum 247000 ug/L D 10 E200.8 08/25/20 12:42 I jcg
Nickel 27100 ug/L D 30 E200.8 08/25/20 12:42 / jcg
Selenium 16600 ug/L D 20 E200.8 08/25/20 12:42 / jcg
Silver 1290 ug/L D 4 E200.8 08/25/20 12:42 I jcg
Thallium ND ug/L D 50 E200.8 09/02/20 15:02 / jcg
Tin 1220 ug/L 50 E200.8 08/25/20 12:42 I jcg
Uranium 200000 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08/25/20 18:44 I jcg
Vanadium 2090000 ug/L D 1000 E200.8 08/25/20 18:44 / jcg
Zinc 396000 ug/L D 3000 E200.8 08/25/20 18:44 I jcg
••• Dissolved Mercury subbed to Test America.
DATA QUALITY
Solids, Total Dissolved -Calculated 350000 mg/L A1030 E 08/26/20 10:07 I jlw
Report RL -Analyte Reporting Limit MCL -Maximum Contaminant Level
Definitions: QCL -Quality Control Limit ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL)
D -Reporting Limit (RL) increased due to sample matrix E -Estimated value -result exceeds the instrument upper
quantitation limit
H -Analysis performed past the method holding time
Page 3 of 54
El'ERGY Trust our People. Trust our Data.
www.energylab.com
Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515
Gillette, WY 886.688.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: Annual Tailings 2020
Lab ID: C20080962-001
Client Sample ID: Cell 1
Analyses
DATA QUALITY
A/C Balance
Anions
Cations
Calion/Anion Balance includes selected metals
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte Reporting Limit
QCL -Quality Control Limit
Result Units
4.20 %
6150 meq/L
6690 meq/L
Qualifiers RL
MCU
Report Date: 09/09/20
Collection Date: 08/19/20 08:30
DateReceived: 08/21/20
Matrix: Aqueous
QCL Method Analysis Date / By
A1030 E
A1030 E
A1030 E
08/26/20 10:07 I jlw
08/26/20 10:07 I jlw
08/26/20 10:07 / jlw
MCL -Maximum Contaminant Level
ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL)
Page 4 of 54
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: September 14, 2020
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Contact: Ms. Kathy W einel
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization ----------Client Sample ID: Cell l
Sample ID: 519405001
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Water
19-AUG-20 08:30
21-AUG-20
Client
Parameter Qualifier Result DL RL ------------~---------.; olatile Organics
;ws46 8260B Volatiles "As Received"
'.-Butanone 6.41
\cetone 32.6
lenzene u ND
:arbon tetrachloride u ND
:hloroform 2.84
:hloromethane 1.49
v1ethylene chloride U ND
~aphthalene U ND
:etrahydrofuran U ND
:oluene U ND
(ylenes (total) U ND
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
\1ethod Descri tion
SW846 82608
,urrogate/Tracer Recovery
,2-Dichloroethane-d4
lromofl uorobenzene
roluene-d8
'iotes:
Test
SW846 82608 Volatiles "As Received"
SW846 82608 Volatiles "As Received"
SW846 82608 Volatiles "As Received"
1.67 5.00
1.74 5.00
0.333 1.00
0.333 1.00
0.333 1.00
0.333 1.00
1.67 5.00
0.333 1.00
1.67 5.00
0.333 1.00
1.00 3.00
Project:
Client ID:
------------DNMI00107
DNMI001
Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
Result
58.2 ug/L
49.8 ug/L
50.0 ug/L
------
MXL2 08/26/20 1116 2033589
An!!]yst Commen=ts=------------
Nominal
50.0
50.0
50.0
Recovery% Acceptable Limits ·---~~----
116 (7lo/o-134%)
100 (70%-131%)
100 (74%-124%)
;RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Column headers are defined as follows:
OF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Page 19 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Tailings 2020 Characterization
Client Sample ID: Cell 1
Sample ID: 519405001
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Water
19-AUG-20 08:30
21-AUG-20
Client
'arameter .Qmtlifier Result DL
,em i-Volatile-GC/MS
,W846 35JOC/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) "As Received"
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene u ND 30.0
1,2-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine u ND 30.0
1,3-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0
l, 4-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0
1-Methy !naphthalene u ND 3.00
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol u ND 30.0
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol u ND 30.0
2,4-Dichlorophenol u ND 30.0
2,4-Dimethylphenol u ND 30.0
2,4-Dinitrophenol u ND 50.0
2,4-Dinitrotoluene u ND 30.0
2,6-Dinitrotoluene u ND 30.0
2-Chloronaphthalene u ND 4.10
2-Chlorophenol u ND 30.0
2-Methyl-4,6-u ND 30.0
dinitrophenol
2-Methy !naphthalene u ND 3.00
2-Nitrophenol u ND 30.0
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine u ND 33.0
4-u ND 30.0
Bromophenylphenylethe
r
4-Chloro-3-u ND 30.0
methyl phenol
4-u ND 30.0
Chlorophenylphenylethe
r
4-Nitrophenol u ND 30.0
Acenaphthene u ND 3.00
Acenaphthylene u ND 3.00
Anthracene u ND 3.00
Benzi dine u ND 39.0
Benzo(a)anthracene u ND 3.00
Benzo( a )pyrene u ND 3.00
Benzo(b )fluoranthene u ND 3.00
Page 39 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Report Date: September 29, 2020
Proiect: DNMI00107
Client ID: DNMI001
------------
1.!k__ Units PF ___ OF Analy~t Date Time Batch Method
100 ug/L 0.0100 AGSI 08/26/20 2252 2033648
100 ug/L 0.0100
100 ug/L 0.0100
100 ug/L 0.0100
100 ug/L 0.0100
10.0 ug/L 0.0100
100 ug/L 0.0100
100 ug/L 0.0100
100 ug/L 0.0100
100 ug/L 0.0100
200 ug/L 0.0100
100 ug/L 0.0100
100 ug/L 0.0100
10.0 ug/L 0.0100
100 ug/L 0.0100
100 ug/L 0.0100
10.0 ug/L 0.0100
100 ug/L 0.0100
100 ug/L 0.0100
100 ug/L 0.0100
100 ug/L 0.0100
100 ug/L 0.0100
100 ug/L 0.0100
10.0 ug/L 0.0100
10.0 ug/L 0.0100
10.0 ug/L 0.0100
100 ug/L 0.0100
10.0 ug/L 0.0100
10.0 ug/L 0.0100
10.0 ug/L 0.0100
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: September 29, 2020
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization
----
Client Sample ID: Cell 1 Proiect: DNMI00107
Sample I~ 519405001 Client ID: DNMI001 ---
>arameter ualifier Result DL RL Units PF DF Analrst Date Time Batch Method
,em i-Volatile-GC/MS
,W846 35JOC/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) "As Received"
Benzo(ghi)perylene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 1
Benzo(k )fl uoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 1
Butylbenzylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
Chrysene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 1
Di-n-buty lphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
Di-n-octylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 I
Dibenzo( a,h )anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 1
Diethylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
Dimethy lphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
Diphenylamine u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
Fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 1
Fluorene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 1
Hexachlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
Hexachlorobutadiene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
Hexachlorocyclopentadi u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
ene
Hexachloroethane u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
lsophorone u ND 35.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
N-Methyl-N-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
nitrosomethylamine
N-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Nitrosodipropylamine
Naphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Nitro benzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Pentachlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Phenanthrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Phenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Pyridine u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
bis(2-Chloro-1-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
methy lethy I )ether
bis(2-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Chloroethoxy )methane
bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
bis(2-u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Ethy lhexy l)phthalate
m,p-Cresols u ND 37.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
o-Cresol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
Page 40 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Report Date: September 29, 2020
Contact:
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Cell I
519405001 -----
Proiect: DNMIOO I 07
Client ID: DNMIOOI
•arameter ualilier Re=s=ul:..:.t ____ --'D=L'-____ RL -----=U~n=its.,____,Pe,.,F,___ __ -=O'--"F--'-'A=nal st Date Time Batch Method
,em i-Volatile-GC/MS
,W846 35JOC/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) "As Received"
Surrogate/Tracer recovery
2 4,6-Tribromophcnol
2-Fluorobiphenyl
Result
1090 ug/L
397 ug/L
397 ug/L
399 ug/L.
402 ug/L
533 ug/L
Nominal
itrobenzene-d5
Phcnol-d5
p-Terphenyl-d 14
2-Fluorophenol
Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) CAS No.
unknown
Butyrolactone
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
I (3H)-Isobenzofuranone
unknown
1,4-Benzenediamine, N,N-diethyl-
1 H-Isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
000096-48-0
000087-41-2
000093-05-0
000085-41-6
Page 41 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
IOOO
500
500
IOOO
500
IOOO
RT
1.981
4.302
5.682
5.751
5.778
5.848
5.944
6.094
7.062
7.618
7.677
8.1
8.618
9.18
9.394
9.442
9.875
9.977
10.207
10.25
13.261
13.352
13.555
13.865
13 .892
Recovery% Acceptable Limits Date Time: 08/16/20 11 51
109 (32%-122%)
79 (31%-107%)
79 (35%-113%)
40 (15%-91%)
80 (35%-134%)
53 (15%-88%)
Est. Concentration Fit Qua/ Date Time: 08116/20 12 51
1490 ug/L 0 J
134 ug/L 90 NJ
152 ug/L 0 J
313 ug/L 0 J
80.4 ug/L 0 J
2750 ug/L 0 J
89.7 ug/L 0 J
54.7 ug/L 0 J
42.6 ug/L 0 J
43.5 ug/L 0 J
43 .5 ug/L 0 J
57.1 ug/L 0 J
54.2 ug/L 97 NJ
64.2 ug/L 0 J
65 .2 ug/L 98 NJ
54.4 ug/L 98 NJ
57.6 ug/L 0 J
63.9 ug/L 0 J
76.5 ug/L 0 J
47.8 ug/L 0 J
43.7ug/L 0 J
209 ug/L 0 J
107 ug/L 0 J
142 ug/L 0 J
92.6ug/L 0 J
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Tailings 2020 Characterization
Client Sample ID:
Same!e ID:
Cell 1
519405001
Report Date: September 29, 2020
Proiect: DNMI00107
Client ID: DNMI001
~>a~ra=m=et=e~r _____ ...._u=a=lifi=· =te-=-r R=e=s=ul=t____ DL ___ __,RL=----=U=n=it=s _P::..cF=------=D=F,_ Analyst Date Time Batch Method
,em i-Volatile-GC/MS
,W846 35JOC/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) "As Received"
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
14.325
14.47
15.149
15.705
16.572
47.8 ug/L
57.8 ug/L
42.8 ug/L
42.5 ug/L
90.6 ug/L
The following Pre Methods were__,p_e_rfi_o_rm_ed __________ _
Method Description Analyst
SW846 35IOC 3510C BNA Liq. Prep-8270 Analysis AS2
The followin Analytical Methods were erformed
Method Description
SW846 3 51 OC/8270D
0 J
0 J
0 J
0 J
0 J
Date Time Prep Batch
08/26/20 0205 2033647
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Notes:
Column headers are defined as follows:
DF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Page 42 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: September 18, 2020
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization -------------Client Sample ID: Cell I
Sample ID: 51940500 I
Matrix: Water
Collect Date: l 9-AUG-20 08:30
Receive Date: 21-AUG-20
Collector: Client
Parameter Qualifier Result Unc_e_rt_a1_· n_ty ___ M_DC
-Iigh Rad Testing
\lphaspec Th, Liquid "As Received"
:horium-228 1090 +/-263 413
:horium-230 l.03E+06 +/-7530 459
:horium-232 6670 +/-607 214
]FPC,Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
}ross Radium Alpha 83800 +/-890 107
Jucas Cell, Ra226, liquid "As Received"
ladium-226 801 +/-29.1 12.9
J-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 "As Received"
Jranium-233/234 68300 +/-2160 534
Jranium-235/236 4020 +/-589 403
Jranium-238 64600 +/-2100 549
fhe following Prep Methods were performed:
viethod Description
3L-RAD-A-026 Laboratory omposi.tc
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
RL
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Analyst
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00107
DNMIOOI
Units _!!__DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCi/L JXB7 09/03/20 0717 2033149
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L AXM6 09/10/20 0702 2033151 2
pCi/L MXH8 09/10/20 0902 2033152 3
pCi/L JXB7 09/02/20 1134 2033150 4
pCi/L
pCi/L
Date Time Prep Batch --------2032694
--------------\1ethod__ Descri tion _________________ An~ al st Comments
DOE EML HASL-300, Th-01-RC Modified
EPA 903.0
EPA 903.1 Modified
DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified
;urrogate/Tracer Recovery Test
rhorium-229 Tracer
3arium Carrier
Jranium-232 Tracer
'lotes:
Alphaspec Th, Liquid "As Received"
GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 "As Received"
:::ounting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (I-sigma).
Result Nominal Recovery% Acee table Limits ___ _._ ____ _
120 (15%-125%)
99.7 (25%-125%)
103 (15%-125%)
iRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. ·
Page 102 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: September 18, 2020
Company :
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization ---------Client Sample ID: Cell 1
Sample ID: 51940500 I
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC
Column headers are defined as follows:
DF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
RL
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
Page 103 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00107
DNMI001
Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: September 15, 2020
Company:
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Katky Weinel
Tailings 2020 Characterization ------------------Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Ce 11 l
519405001
Water
19-AUG-20 08:30
21-AUG-20
Client
Parameter Qualifier Result
fazardous Waste
\STM D 5057 Specific Gravity "As Received"
,pecific Gravity 1.33
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
DL
0.0100
Method DescriQ_ti_on ___________ _
ASTMD 5057
~otes:
RL
0.100
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00107
DNMI001
Units PF OF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
none I VHI 08/26/20 1015 2033728
Anal st Comments
,RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
· he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Column headers are defined as follows:
DF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Page 88 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
Er\ERGY Trust our People. Trust our Data.
www.energylab.com
Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515
Gillette, WY 866.688.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Report Date: 09/09/20
Project: Annual Tailings 2020 Collection Date: 08/19/20 08:50
Lab ID: C20080962-002 DateReceived: 08/21/20
Client Sample ID: Cell 2 Slimes Matrix: Aqueous
MCL/
Analyses Result Units Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date / By
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03 ND mg/L 5 A2320 B 08/24/20 20:21 I dmb
Bicarbonate as HC03 ND mg/L 5 A2320 B 08/24/20 20:21 I dmb
Chloride 4080 mg/L D 50 E300.0 08/24/20 20:08 I dmb
Fluoride 130 mg/L D 50 A4500-F C 08/24/20 11 :47 / dmb
Sulfate 67000 mg/L D 200 E300.0 08/24/20 20:08 I dmb
Calcium 513 mg/L D 30 E200.7 08/24/20 15:37 / meh
Magnesium 3800 mg/L E200.7 08/24/20 15:37 / meh
Potassium 735 mg/L D 20 E200.7 08/24/20 15:37 / meh
Sodium 4620 mg/L D 50 E200.7 08/24/20 15:37 / meh
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Conductivity @ 25 C 53900 umhos/cm E 5 A2510 B 08/21/20 13:59 / kjp
pH 3.06 s.u. H 0.01 A4500-H B 08/21/20 13:59 / kjp
pH Measurement Temp 15 oc A4500-H B 08/21/20 13:59 / kjp
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS@ 180 C 89500 mg/L D 1000 A2540 C 08/21/20 12:15 / kjp
NUTRIENTS
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 21.6 mg/L D 0.05 E353.2 08/24/20 16:22 / dmb
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 7150 mg/L D 1000 E350.1 08/26/20 09:57 I hat
METALS, DISSOLVED
Arsenic 18000 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08/25/20 19:00 I jcg
Beryllium 284 ug/L D 60 E200.7 08/24/20 15:37 / meh
Cadmium 5220 ug/L D 100 E200.B 08/25/20 19:00 I jcg
Chromium 1860 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08/25/20 19:00 I jcg
Cobalt 40800 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08/25/20 19:00 I jcg
Copper 93900 ug/L D 1000 E200.8 08/25/20 19:00 I jcg
Iron 2420000 ug/L D 5000 E200.8 08/25/20 19:00 / jcg
Lead 400 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08/25/20 19:00 I jcg
Manganese 133000 ug/L D 100 E200.7 08/24/20 15:37 / meh
Mercury 0.058 ug/L 0.2 E245.1 09/03/20 15:58 / eet-d
Molybdenum 2170 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08/25/20 19:00 I jcg
Nickel 104000 ug/L D 300 E200.8 08/25/20 19:00 I jcg
Selenium 585 ug/L D 200 E200.8 08/25/20 19:00 I jcg
Silver 6 ug/L D 4 E200.8 08/28/20 15:4 7 I jcg
Thallium 2190 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08/25/20 19:00 I jcg
Tin ND ug/L 50 E200.8 08/28/20 15:47 I jcg
Uranium 18600 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08/25/20 19:00 I jcg
Vanadium 345000 ug/L D 1000 E200.8 08/25/20 19:00 I jcg
Zinc 816000 ug/L D 10000 E200.8 08/28/20 15:42 / jcg
••• Dissolved Mercury subbed to Test America.
DATA QUALITY
Solids, Total Dissolved -Calculated 81000 mg/L A1030 E 08/28/20 16:10 / jlw
Report RL -Analyte Reporting Limit MCL -Maximum Contaminant Level
Definitions: QCL -Quality Control Limit ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL)
D -Reporting Limit (RL) increased due to sample matrix E -Estimated value -result exceeds the instrument upper
quantitation limit
H -Analysis performed past the method holding time
Page 5 of 54
EN:RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data.
www.energylab.com
Billings, MT 800.135.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515
Gillette, WY 868.888.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: Annual Tailings 2020
Lab ID: C20080962-002
Client Sample ID: Cell 2 Slimes
Analyses
DATA QUALITY
A/C Balance
Anions
Cations
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte Reporting Limit
QCL -Quality Control Limit
Result Units
4.04 %
1520 meq/L
1650 meq/L
Qualifiers
MCU
RL QCL
Report Date: 09/09/20
Collection Date: 08/19/20 08:50
DateReceived: 08/21/20
Matrix: Aqueous
Method Analysis Date I By
A1030 E 08/28/20 16:10 / jlw
A1030 E 08/28/20 16:10 / jlw
A1030 E 08/28/20 16:10 / jlw
MCL -Maximum Contaminant Level
ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL)
Page 6 of 54
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Company:
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Certificate of Analysis
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy W einel
Tailings 2020 Characterization
Cell2 Slimes
519405002
Water
19-AUG-20 08:50
21-AUG-20
Client
--------
------------
Project:
Client ID:
Report Date: September 14, 2020
DNMI00107
DNMIOOI
Parameter Qualifier Result DL RL Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method ----------------------,/ olatile Organics
;;w846 8260B Volatiles "As Received"
'.-Butanone
\cetone
3enzene
:arbon tetrachloride
:hloroform
u
u
74.0
501
ND
ND
13.7
:hloromethane U ND
vlethylene chloride U ND
~aphthalene 7 .65
:etrahydrofuran U ND
'.oluene U ND
{ylenes (total) U ND
8.34 25.0 ug/L
8.72 25.0 ug/L
1.67 5.00 ug/L
1.67 5.00 ug/L
1.67 5.00 ug/L
1.67 5.00 ug/L
8.34 25.0 ug/L
1.67 5.00 ug/L
8.34 25.0 ug/L
1.67 5.00 ug/L
5.00 15.0 ug/L
The following Analytical Methods were performed: --=----------------------
5 MXL2 08/26/20 0236 2033589
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
\.1 et hod Descri tion ----~--------------------Anal st Com~m_e=n=ts~----------
SW846 8260B
;;urrogate/Tracer Recovery Test _ _,._ _______ _ Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits ._ __ __,,__ ___ _
,2-Dichloroethane-d4 SW846 8260B Volatiles "As Received" 249 ug/L 50.0 99 (71%-134%)
3romofluorobenzene SW846 8260B Volatiles "As Received" 238 ug/L 50.0 95 (70%-131%)
1oluene-d8 SW846 8260B Volatiles "As Received" 257 ug/L 50.0 103 (74%-124%)
lfotes:
;;RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Column headers are defined as follows:
DF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Page 20 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company; Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address; 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: September 29, 2020
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization
Client Sample ID: Cell 2 Slimes Proiect: DNMI00107
Sample ID: 519405002 Client ID: DNMI001
Matrix: Water
Collect Date: 19-AUG-20 08:50
Receive Date: 21-AUG-20
Collector: Client -----
>arameter ualifier Result DL RL Units PF DF Anal sL Date Time Batch Method
,em i-V olatile-GC/MS
>W846 3510C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) ''As Received"
l ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 I AGSl 08/26/20 2321 2033648
l,2-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
1,2-Dipheny !hydrazine u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 I
1-Methylnaphthalene 11.9 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 1
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
2,4-Dichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
2,4-Dimethylphenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 I
2,4-Dinitrophenol u ND 50.0 200 ug/L 0.0100 1
2,4-Dinitrotoluene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
2,6-Dinitrotoluene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
2-Chloronaphthalene u ND 4.10 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 1
2-Chlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
2-Methyl-4,6-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
dinitrophenol
2-Methylnaphthalene 11.3 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
2-Nitrophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine u ND 33.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
4-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Bromophenylphenylethe
r
4-Chloro-3-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
methyl phenol
4-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Ch\orophenylphenylethe
r
4-Nitrophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Acenaphthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Acenaphthylene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Benzi dine u ND 39.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Benzo( a )anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Benzo( a )pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Benzo(b )fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Page 43 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: September 29, 2020
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization
--------
Client Sample ID: Cell 2 Slimes Proiect: DNMI00107
Sample ID: 519405002 Client ID: DNMIOOl ---
>arameter Qualifier Result DL RL Units PF OF AnaJyst Date Time Batch Method
lem i-Volatile-GC/MS
,W846 3510C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) ''As Received"
Benzo(ghi )pery lene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Benzo(k)fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Butylbenzylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100
Chrysene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Di-n-butylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100
Di-n-octylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100
Dibenzo( a,h )anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Diethy lphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100
Dimethylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100
Diphenylamine u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Fluorene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Hexachlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Hexachlorobutadiene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Hexachlorocyclopentadi u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
ene
Hexachloroethane u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
lndeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Isophorone u ND 35.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
N-Methyl-N-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
nitrosomethylamine
N-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
N itrosodipropy I amine
Naphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Nitro benzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Pentachlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Phenanthrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Phenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Pyridine u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
bis(2-Chloro-l-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
methy lethy I )ether
bis(2-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Chloroethoxy)methane
bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
bis(2-u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Ethylhexy l)phthalate
m,p-Cresols u ND 37.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
o-Cresol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Page 44 of 119 SDG: 519405 Rev 1
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Report Date: September 29, 2020
Contact:
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Cell 2 Slimes
519405002
>a=r~a=m=e=te=r _____ ~lifier Result DL
,em i-Volatile-GC/MS
,W846 35JOC/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) ''As Received"
Surrogllte!Tracer recovery
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Phenol-d5
2-Fluorobiphenyl
Nitrobenzene-d5
2-Fluorophenol
p-Terpheny 1-d 14
Result
1120 ug/L
341 ug/L
378 ug/L
404 ug/L
461 ug/L
513 ug/L
Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) CAS No.
unknown
3-Heptanone
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-methyl-
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
Hexanoic acid, 2-ethyl-
unknown
Octanoic Acid
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
1,4-Benzenediamine, N,N-diethyl-
unknown
unknown
unknown
000106-35-4
000108-29-2
000149-57-5
000124-07-2
000093-05-0
The following Pre Methods were erformed
Method Description
Nominal
1000
1000
500
500
1000
500
RT
l.981
4.003
4.773
5.126
5.629
5.757
6.099
6.549
6.912
7.057
7.164
7.201
7.255
7.661
7.859
7.95
7.993
9.399
9.522
9.865
l l.892
SW846 3510C 3510C BNA Liq. Prep-8270 Analysis
Page 45 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Proiect: DNMI00107
Client ID: DNMIOO 1
RL Units PF DF Anal st Date Time Batch Method
Recovery% Acceptable Limits Date Time: 08/26/2023 21
112 (32%-122%)
34 (15%-91%)
76 (31%-107%)
81 (35%-113%)
46 (15%-88%)
103 (35%-134%)
Est. Concentration Fit Qua/ Date Time: 08/26/2023 21
1370 ug/L 0 J
48.8 ug/L 91 NJ
49.7 ug/L 91 NJ
98.7 ug/L 0 J
1300 ug/L 0 J
121 ug/L 0 J
190 ug/L 0 J
145 ug/L 90 NJ
42.3 ug/L 0 J
127 ug/L 91 NJ
108 ug/L 0 J
44.9 ug/L 0 J
44.2 ug/L 0 J
48.8 ug/L 0 J
147 ug/L 0 J
44.4 ug/L 0 J
95.6 ug/L 0 J
608 ug/L 98 NJ
43. l ug/L 0 J
74.7 ug/L 0 J
45.2 ug/L 0 J
Analyst Date Time Prep Batch
AS2 08/26/20 0205 2033647
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Tailings 2020 Characterization
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Cell 2 Slimes
519405002
1arameter ualifier Result DL
The following Anal tical Methods were erformed
Method Description
Report Date: September 29, 2020
Proiect: DNMI00107
Client ID: DNMI001
RL Units PF DF Anal st Date Time Batch Method
Analyst Comments -----------------------SW846 3510C/8270D
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Notes:
Column headers are defined as follows:
DF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Page 46 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: September 18, 2020
Company :
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization --------Client Sample ID: Cell 2 Slimes
Sample ID: 519405002
Matrix: Water
Collect Date: 19-AUG-20 08:50
Receive Date: 21-AUG-20
Collector: Client
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC ------
1igh Rad Testing
\lphaspec Th, Liquid "As Received"
:horium-228 u 62.9 +/-137
:horium-230 5180 +/-560
'.horium-232 u 226 +/-155
3FPC,Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
}ross Radium Alpha 1630 +/-132
Jucas Cell, Ra226, liquid "As Received"
ladium-226 86.0 +/-9.86
J-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 "As Received"
Jranium-233/234 8680 +/-711
Jranium-235/236 917 +/-275
Jranium-238 8760 +/-711
fhe following Prep Methods were performed:
IAethod Description
,L·RAD-A-026 Laboratory Composite
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
\tlethod Description
DOE EML HASL-300, Th-OJ-RC Modified
EPA 903.0
EPA 903.1 Modified
DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified
;urrogate/Tracer Recovery Test
Alphaspec Th, Liquid "As Received"
529
598
460
98.3
8.44
476
463
375
rhorium-229 Tracer
3arium Carrier
Jranium-232 Tracer
GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 "As Received"
~otes:
RL
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Analyst
=:ounting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (I-sigma).
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00107
DNMIOOI
Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
Date
Result
JXB7 09/03/20 0717 2033149
AXM6 09/10/20 0702 2033151 2
MXH8 09/10/20 0902 2033152 3
JXB7 09/02/20 1134 2033150 4
Time Prep Batch
2032694
Anal st Comments
Nominal Recovery%
103
IOI
102
Acceptable Limits
(15%-125%)
(25%-125%)
(15%-125%)
iRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Page 104 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: September 18, 2020
Company:
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Tailings 2020 Characterization
Cell 2 Slimes
519405002
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC
Column headers are defined as follows:
DF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
RL
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
Page 105 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00107
DNMIOOI
Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: September 15, 2020
Company :
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization -------------------Client Sample ID: Cell 2 Slimes
Sample ID: 519405002
Matrix: Water
Collect Date: 19-AUG-20 08:50
Receive Date: 21-AUG-20
Collector: Client
Qualifier Result ----------'-----------Parameter
-Iazardous Waste
\STM D 5057 Specific Gravity "As Received"
,pecific Gravity 1.08
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
DL RL
0.0100 0.100
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00107
DNMI001
Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
none I VHI 08/26/20 1015 2033728
\.fethod De.::...sc:..::.rc:.o;i =ti=o=n-------------------~A=n=a"'l·'""'s"'-t -=-C-=-o=m=m=e=n=ts ____________ _
ASTMD 5057
llotes:
;RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Column headers are defined as follows:
DF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Page 89 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
EN:RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data.
www.energylab.com
Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515
Gillette, WY 866.686.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Report Date: 09/09/20
Project: Annual Tailings 2020 Collection Date: 08/19/20 09: 15
Lab ID: C20080962-003 DateReceived: 08/21/20
Client Sample ID: Cell4A Matrix: Aqueous
MCL/
Analyses Result Units Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date / By
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03 ND mg/L 5 A2320 B 08/24/20 20:23 I dmb
Bicarbonate as HC03 ND mg/L 5 A2320 B 08/24/20 20:23 I dmb
Chloride 9120 mg/L D 100 E300.0 08/24/20 20:27 I dmb
Fluoride 1700 mg/L D 50 A4500-F C 08/24/20 11 :52 / dmb
Sulfate 85700 mg/L D 400 E300.0 08/24/20 20:27 I dmb
Calcium 641 mg/L D 30 E200.7 08/24/20 15:49 / meh
Magnesium 4700 mg/L E200.7 08/24/20 15:49 I meh
Potassium 1660 mg/L D 20 E200.7 08/24/20 15:49 / meh
Sodium 17700 mg/L D 50 E200.7 08/24/20 15:49 / meh
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Conductivity@ 25 C 84000 umhos/cm E 5 A2510 B 08/21/20 14:11 / kjp
pH 2.36 s.u. H 0.01 A4500-H B 08/21/20 14:11 / kjp
pH Measurement Temp 16 oc A4500-H B 08/21/20 14:11 / kjp
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 139000 mg/L D 2000 A2540 C 08/21 /20 12: 15 / kjp
NUTRIENTS
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 84.8 mg/L D 0.2 E353.2 08/24/20 16:23 / dmb
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 10000 mg/L D 1000 E350.1 08/26/20 09:58 I hat
METALS, DISSOLVED
Arsenic 71300 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08/25/20 19:05 I jcg
Beryllium 485 ug/L D 60 E200.7 08/24/20 15:49 / meh
Cadmium 3490 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08/25/20 19:05 I jcg
Chromium 9050 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08/25/20 19:05 / jcg
Cobalt 32800 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08/25/20 19:05 / jcg
Copper 617000 ug/L D 1000 E200.8 08/25/20 19:05 I jcg
Iron 3690000 ug/L D 5000 E200.8 08/25/20 19:05 I jcg
Lead 8680 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08/25/20 19:05 I jcg
Manganese 211000 ug/L D 100 E200.7 08/24/20 15:49 I meh
Mercury 3.4 ug/L 0.2 E245.1 09/03/20 16:00 / eet-d
Molybdenum 25700 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08/25/20 19:05 / jcg
Nickel 58800 ug/L D 300 E200.8 08/25/20 19:05 I jcg
Selenium 3660 ug/L D 200 E200.8 08/25/20 19:05 I jcg
Silver 487 ug/L D 40 E200.8 08/25/20 19:05 I jcg
Thallium 524 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08/25/20 19:05 / jcg
Tin 181 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08/25/20 19:05 I jcg
Uranium 42600 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08/25/20 19:05 I jcg
Vanadium 205000 ug/L D 1000 E200.8 08/25/20 19:05 / jcg
Zinc 350000 ug/L D 3000 E200.8 08/25/20 19:05 I jcg
••• Dissolved Mercury subbed to Test America
DATA QUALITY
Solids, Total Dissolved -Calculated 120000 mg/L A1030 E 08/26/20 10:09 / jlw
Report RL -Analyte Reporting Limit MCL -Maximum Contaminant Level
Definitions: QCL -Quality Control Limit ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL)
D -Reporting Limit (RL) increased due to sample matrix E -Estimated value -result exceeds the instrument upper
quantitation limit
H -Analysis performed past the method holding time
Page 7 of 54
,EN:RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data.
www.energylab.com
Billings, MT 800.135.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515
Gillette, WY 868.688.7175 • Helena, MT877.472.0711
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: Annual Tailings 2020
Lab ID: C20080962-003
Client Sample ID: Cell 4A
Analyses
DATA QUALITY
NC Balance
Anions
Cations
Cation/Anion Balance includes selected metals
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte Reporting Limit
QCL -Quality Control Limit
Result Units
-5.12 %
2140 meq/L
1930 meq/L
Qualifiers RL
MCU
Report Date: 09/09/20
Collection Date: 08/19/20 09: 15
DateReceived: 08/21/20
Matrix: Aqueous
QCL Method Analysis Date / By
A1030 E
A1030 E
A1030 E
08/26/20 10:09 / jlw
08/26/20 10:09 I jlw
08/26/20 10:09 I jlw
MCL -Maximum Contaminant Level
ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL)
Page 8 of 54
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: September 14, 2020
Company :
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Tailings 2020 Characterization --~-~ Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Cell 4A
519405003
Water
19-AUG-20 09:15
21-AUG-20
Client
---------
Parameter Qualifier Result ------------------volatile Organics
;W846 8260B Volatiles "As Received"
'.-Butanone U ND
\cetone 16.2
lenzene
:arbon tetrachloride
V
V
ND
ND
:hloroform 1.50
:hloromethane 1.90
Jethylene chloride U ND
~aphthalene U ND
:etrahydrofuran U ND
:oluene U ND
{ylenes (total) U ND
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
\1ethod Descri tion
DL RL
1.67 5.00
1.74 5.00
0.333 1.00
0.333 1.00
0.333 1.00
0.333 1.00
1.67 5.00
0.333 1.00
1.67 5.00
0.333 1.00
1.00 3.00
Project:
Client ID:
Units PF
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
DNMI00107
DNMIOOl
DF Analyst Date
MXL2 08/26/20
Anal st Commenls --~---------------------~~~ SW846 8260B
;urrogate/Tracer Recovery Test Result Nominal Recovery%
,2-Dichloroethane-d4 SW846 82608 Volatiles "As Received" 55.0 ug/L 50.0 110
lromofluorobenzene SW846 82608 Volatiles "As Received" 48.3 ug/L 50.0 97
roJuene-d8 SW846 82608 Volatiles "As Received" 51.1 ug/L 50.0 102
~otes:
Time Batch Method
1142 2033589
Acceptable Limits
(71%-134%)
(70%-131%)
(74%-124%)
;RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Column headers are defined as follows:
OF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Page 21 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: September 29, 2020
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization
Client Sample ID: Cell 4A Proiect: DNMI00107
Sample ID: 519405003 Client ID: DNMI001
Matrix: Water
Collect Date: l 9-AUG-20 09: 15
Receive Date: 21-AUG-20
Collector: Client
'arameter _Qualifier ResuJt DL RL Units PF DF Anall,'st Date Time Batch Method
;em i-V o latile-GC/MS
,W846 3510C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) "As Received"
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1 AGS1 08/26/20 2349 2033648
1,2-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
1-Methylnaphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 1
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
2, 4,6-Trichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
2, 4-Dichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
2,4-Dimethylphenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
2, 4-Dinitrophenol u ND 50.0 200 ug/L 0.0100 1
2,4-Dinitrotoluene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
2,6-Dinitrotoluene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
2-Chloronaphthalene u ND 4.10 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 1
2-Chlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
2-Methyl-4,6-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
dinitropheno I
2-Methylnaphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
2-Nitrophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine u ND 33 .0 100 ug/L 0.0100
4-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Bromopheny lpheny lethe
r
4-Chloro-3-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
methylphenol
4-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Chlorophenylphenylethe
r
4-Nitrophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Acenaphthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Acenaphthylene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Benzi dine u ND 39.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Benzo( a )anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Benzo( a )pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Benzo(b )fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Page 47 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: September 29, 2020
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization
---
Client Sample ID: Cell 4A Proiect: DNMI00107
Sample ID: 519405003 Client ID: DNMI001 ----
>arameter Qualifier Result __ _.!!k RL Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
iem i-Volatile-GC/MS
,W846 35JOC/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) "As Received"
Benzo(ghi )pery Jene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Benzo(k)fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Butylbenzylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100
Chrysene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Di-n-butylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100
Di-n-octylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100
Dibenzo( a,h)anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Diethy lphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100
Dimethy lphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100
Diphenylamine u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Fluorene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Hexachlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Hexachlorobutadiene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Hexachlorocyclopentadi u ND 30.0 JOO ug/L 0.0100
ene
Hexachloroethane u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd}pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Isophorone u ND 35.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
N-Methyl-N-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
nitrosomethylamine
N-u ND 30.0 JOO ug/L 0.0100
Nitrosodipropylamine
Naphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 I
Nitro benzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 I
Pentachlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
Phenanthrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 1
Phenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 I
Pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 I
Pyridine u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
bis(2-Chloro-1-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
methylethyl}ether
bis(2-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Chloroethoxy)methane
bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
bis(2-u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Ethylhexy I )phthalate
m,p-Cresols u ND 37.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
o-Cresol u ND 30.0 JOO ug/L 0.0100 l
Page 48 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Report Date: September 29, 2020
Contact:
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Cell 4A
519405003 ------
~rameter ualifier Result DL
,em i-Volatile-GC/MS
,W846 35JOC/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) "As Received"
Surrogatellracer recovery
Phenol-d5
2-Fluorophenol
Nitrobenzene-d5
2-Fluorobiphenyl
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
p-Terphenyl-dl4
Result
298 ug/L
316 ug/L
321 ug/L
325 ug/L
384 ug/L
457 ug/L
Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) CAS No.
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
2(3H)-Furanone, 5-ethyldihydro-
unknown
Heptanoic acid
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-propyl-
Octanoic Acid
1 (3H)-Isobenzofuranone
unknown
Formamide, N-octyl-
Tributyl phosphate
1-Hexanamine, 2-ethyl-N-(2-ethylhe
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
000695-06-7
000 I 11-14-8
000105-21-5
000124-07-2
000087-41-2
006282-06-0
000126-73-8
000106-20-7
Nominal
1000
1000
500
500
1000
500
RT
1.981
5.115
5.698
5.757
5.826
5.923
5.998
6.254
6.918
7.121
8.613
9.1
9.185
10.448
11.132
11.336
12.197
12.272
12.32
13.352
14.235
14.342
16.16
Proiect: DNMI00107
Client ID: DNMIOOI
RL Units PF --~D~F~ _Anal st Date Time Batch Method
Recovery% Acceptable Limits Date Time: 08126/20 23 49
30 (15%-91%)
32 (15%-88%)
64 (35%-113%)
65 (31 o/o-107%)
38 (32%-122%)
91 (35%-134%)
Est. Concentration Fit Qua/ Date Time: 08/26/2023 49
717 ug/L 0 J
63.3 ug/L 0 J
40.5 ug/L 0 J
111 ug/L 0 J
728 ug/L 0 J
94.7 ug/L 91 NJ
139ug/L 0 J
333 ug/L 90 NJ
63.2 ug/L 91 NJ
245 ug/L 91 NJ
59.4 ug/L 95 NJ
41.3 ug/L 0 J
83.1 ug/L 90 NJ
140ug/L 91 NJ
62.5 ug/L 90 NJ
46.7 ug/L 0 J
42.6 ug/L 0 J
42.1 ug/L 0 J
42.2 ug/L 0 J
45.8 ug/L 0 J
75 ug/L 0 J
81 ug/L 0 J
223 ug/L 0 J
The following Pre Meth_o_d_s_w_e_r_e .._pe_r_fo_r_m_e_d ___________________ _
Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch
Page 49 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization
-------------------
Client Sample ID:
______ Sample ID:
Cell 4A
519405003 ------------
Report Date: September 29, 2020
-----------
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00107
DNMI001
~.l!!TIC~te~r _____ ,~~~~R~efil!.!L ____ DI., RL Units _P~F_• ___ D_F_~A~nal:r._t_· _Date Time Batch Method
The followin erformed
Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch ---------SW846 3510C 3510C BNA Liq. Prep-8270 Analysis AS2 08/26/20 0205 2033647
The followin Anal tical Methods were erformed
Method Description Analyst Comments
SW846 35IOC/8270D
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Notes:
Column headers are defined as follows:
DF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Page 50 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: September 18, 2020
Company :
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization ----Client Sample ID: Cell 4A
Sample ID: 519405003
Matrix: Water
Collect Date: 19-AUG-20 09:15
Receive Date: 21-AUG-20
Collector: Client
-------Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty
-Iigh Rad Testing
\lphaspec Th, Liquid "As Received"
:horium-228 1040 +/-263
:horium-230 5.21E+05 +/-5340
:horium-232 4130 +/-483
]FPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
3ross Radium Alpha 52400 +/-755
Jucas Cell, Ra226, liquid "As Received"
tadium-226 395 +/-23.5
J-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 "As Received"
Jranium-233/234 17200 +/.] 040
Jranium-23 5/236 991 +/-292
Jranium-238 13700 +/-930
rhe following Prep Methods were performed:
vtethod Description
}L-RAD-A-026 Laboratory Composite
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
MDC
466
543
388
79.9
10.7
478
372
301
RL
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Analyst
Project:
Client ID:
Units PF
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
DNMI00107
DNMI001
DF Analyst Date
JXB7 09/03/20
AXM6 09/10/20
MXH8 09/10/20
JXB7 09/02/20
Date Time Prep Batch
2032694
---------------\1 et hod Descri tion
DOE EML HASL-300, Th-01-RC Modified
EPA903.0
EPA 903.1 Modified
DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified
Time Batch Method
0717 2033149
0737 2033151 2
0902 2033152 3
1134 2033150 4
;;urrogate/Tracer Recovery Test Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits _......,'--------"------------------------------------1horium-229 Tracer Alphaspec Th, Liquid "As Received" 103 (15%-125%)
3arium Carrier GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received" 102 (25o/.-125%)
Jranium-232 Tracer U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 "As Received" 95 (15%-125%)
~otes:
::ounting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (}-sigma).
;;RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Page 106 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: September 18, 2020
Company :
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
---------
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Tailings 2020 Characterization
Cell 4A
519405003
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC
Column headers are defined as follows:
DF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
RL
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
Page 107 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00107
DNMI001
Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: September 15, 2020
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy W einel
Tailings 2020 Characterization --~~ -------Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Cell4A
519405003
Water
19-AUG-20 09:15
21-AUG-20
Client
Parameter Qualifier Result
-Iazardous Waste
\.STM D 5057 Specific Gravity "As Received"
,pecific Gravity I.I 0
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
DL
0.0100
RL
0.100
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00107
DNMI001
Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
none I VHI 08/26/20 1015 2033728
---------------\1 __ e t_h_o_d ______ D_e_s _c r~i p~t_i o_n __ ~----------------~A~n=a l y st Comments __________ _
ASTMD 5057
~otes:
;RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Column headers are defined as follows:
DF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Page 90 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
Er\ERGY Trust our People. Trust our Data.
www.energylab.com
Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515
Gillette, WY 866.686.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: Annual Tailings 2020
Lab ID: C20080962-004
Client Sample ID: Cell 4A LOS
Analyses Result Units Qualifiers
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03 ND mg/L
Bicarbonate as HC03 ND mg/L
Chloride 3860 mg/L D
Fluoride 500 mg/L D
Sulfate 59900 mg/L D
Calcium 496 mg/L D
Magnesium 3690 mg/L
Potassium 334 mg/L D
Sodium 5260 mg/L D
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Conductivity @ 25 C 53200 umhos/cm E
pH 2.25 s.u. H
pH Measurement Temp 16 oc
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS@ 180 C 83800 mg/L D
NUTRIENTS
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 60.2 mg/L D
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 3050 mg/L D
METALS, DISSOLVED
Arsenic 16600 ug/L D
Beryllium 317 ug/L D
Cadmium 4410 ug/L D
Chromium 2820 ug/L D
Cobalt 45800 ug/L D
Copper 273000 ug/L D
Iron 1440000 ug/L D
Lead 254 ug/L D
Manganese 137000 ug/L D
Mercury 0.20 ug/L
Molybdenum 2190 ug/L D
Nickel 110000 ug/L D
Selenium 1230 ug/L D
Silver 150 ug/L DJ
Thallium 425 ug/L D
Tin ND ug/L D
Uranium 48000 ug/L D
Vanadium 374000 ug/L D
Zinc 541000 ug/L D
••• Dissolved Mercury subbed to Test America.
DATA QUALITY
Solids, Total Dissolved -Calculated 74000 mg/L
Report RL -Analyte Reporting Limit
Definitions: QCL -Quality Control Limit
D -Reporting Limit (RL) increased due to sample matrix
H -Analysis performed past the method holding time
MCU
RL QCL
5
5
100
50
400
30
1
20
50
5
0.01
1000
0.2
1000
500
60
500
100
100
1000
6000
100
100
0.2
500
300
1000
200
100
500
100
1000
10000
Report Date: 09/09/20
Collection Date: 08/19/20 09:35
OateReceived: 08/21/20
Matrix: Aqueous
Method Analysis Date / By
A2320 B 08/24/20 20:26 I dmb
A2320 B 08/24/20 20:26 I dmb
E300.0 08/24/20 20:47 I dmb
A4500-F C 08/24/20 11 :56 / dmb
E300.0 08/24/20 20:47 I dmb
E200.7 08/24/20 15:53 / meh
E200.7 08/24/20 15:53 / meh
E200.7 08/24/20 15:53 / meh
E200.7 08/24/20 15:53 / meh
A2510 B 08/21 /20 14: 18 / kjp
A4500-H B 08/21/20 14:18 / kjp
A4500-H B 08/21 /20 14: 18 / kjp
A2540 C 08/21/2012:15 / kjp
E353.2 08/24/20 16:24 / dmb
E350.1 08/26/20 09:59 / hat
E200.8 08/28/20 16:00 I jcg
E200.7 08/24/20 15:53 / meh
E200.8 08/28/20 16:00 I jcg
E200.8 08/25/20 19:32 / jcg
E200.8 08/25/20 19:32 / jcg
E200.8 08/25/20 19:32 / jcg
E200.7 08/24/20 15:53 / meh
E200.8 08/25/20 19:32 / jcg
E200.7 08/24/20 15:53 / meh
E245.1 09/03/20 16:02 I eet-d
E200.8 08/28/20 16:00 I jcg
E200.8 08/25/20 19:32 / jcg
E200.8 08/28/20 16:00 / jcg
E200.8 08/28/20 16:00 I jcg
E200.8 08/25/20 19:32 / jcg
E200.8 08/28/20 16:00 I jcg
E200.8 08/25/20 19:32 / jcg
E200.8 08/25/20 19:32 / jcg
E200.8 08/28/20 16:00 / jcg
A1030 E 08/26/20 10:12 / jlw
MCL -Maximum Contaminant Level
ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL)
E -Estimated value -result exceeds the instrument upper
quantitation limit
J -Estimated value -analyte was present but less than the
Reporting Limit (RL)
Page 9 of 54
E~RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data.
www.energylab.com
Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515
Gillette, WY BBB.BBB. 7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: Annual Tailings 2020
Lab ID: C20080962-004
Client Sample ID: Cell 4A LDS
Analyses
DATA QUALITY
A/C Balance
Anions
Cations
Cation/Anion Balance includes selected metals
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte Reporting Limit
QCL -Quality Control Limit
Result Units
-8.99 %
1390 meq/L
1160 meq/L
Qualifiers RL
MCU
Report Date: 09/09/20
Collection Date: 08/19/20 09:35
DateReceived: 08/21/20
Matrix: Aqueous
QCL Method Analysis Date / By
A1030 E
A1030 E
A1030 E
08/26/20 10:12 / jlw
08/26/20 10:12 / jlw
08/26/20 10:12 / jlw
MCL -Maximum Contaminant Level
ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL)
Page 10 of 54
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: September 14, 2020
Company :
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Tailings 2020 Characterization
Cell 4A LDS
519405004
Water
19-AUG-20 09:35
21-AUG-20
Client
Parameter Qualifier Result DL RL ------------{ o lat i le Organics
,W846 8260B Volatiles "As Received"
1-Butanone 29.5 8.34 25.0
~cetone 90.3 8.72 25.0
3enzene u ND 1.67 5.00
:arbon tetrachloride u ND 1.67 5.00
:hloroform 120 1.67 5.00
:hloromethane 6.90 1.67 5.00
vlethylene chloride U ND 8.34 25.0
~aphthalene U ND 1.67 5.00
'.etrahydrofuran U ND 8.34 25.0
'.oluene U ND 1.67 5.00
(ylenes (total) U ND 5.00 15.0
The following Analytical Methods were performed: ----"---------------vt et bod Descri tion
SW846 8260B
,urrogate/Tracer R_e_c_o_ve_ry~ __ T_e_st ______ _
,2-Dichloroethane-d4 SW846 8260B Volatiles "As Received"
3romofluorobenzene SW846 8260B Volatiles "As Received"
roluene-d8 SW846 8260B Volatiles "As Received"
'lfotes:
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00107
DNMI001
---
Units PF DF Analyst Date
ug/L 5 MXL2 08/26/20
ug/L 5
ug/L 5
ug/L 5
ug/L 5
ug/L 5
ug/L 5
ug/L 5
ug/L 5
ug/L 5
ug/L 5
--Anal st Comments
Result Nominal Recovery%
257 ug/L 50.0 103
241 ug/L 50.0 96
249 ug/L 50.0 99
Time Batch Method
0327 2033589
Acceptable Limits
(71%-134%)
(70%-l31%)
(74%-124%)
,RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Column headers are defined as follows:
DF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Page 22 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: September 29, 2020
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization
Client Sample ID: Cell 4A LDS Proiect: DNMI00107
Sample ID: 519405004 Client ID: DNMI001
Matrix: Water
Collect Date: 19-AUG-20 09:35
Receive Date: 21-AUG-20
Collector: Client -----
>arameter ualifier Result DL RL Units PF DF Anal st Date Time Batch Method
,em i-Volatile-GC/MS
,W846 35/0C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) "As Received"
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 AGSl 08/27/20 0018 2033648
1,2-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
1,3-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
1,4-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
1-Methy lnaphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
2,4-Dichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
2,4-Dimethylphenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
2,4-Dinitrophenol u ND 50.0 200 ug/L 0.0100
2,4-Dinitrotoluene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
2,6-Dinitrotoluene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
2-Chloronaphthalene u ND 4.10 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
2-Chlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
2-Methyl-4,6-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
dinitrophenol
2-Methy !naphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
2-Nitrophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine u ND 33.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
4-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Bromophenylphenylethe
r
4-Chloro-3-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
methylphenol
4-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Chlorophenylphenylethe
r
4-Nitrophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Acenaphthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Acenaphthylene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Benzi dine u ND 39.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Benzo( a )anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Benzo(a)pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Benzo(b )fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Page 51 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: September 29, 2020
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization
Client Sample ID: Cell 4A LDS Proiect: DNMI00107
Samp~ ID: 519405004 Client ID: DNMI001
yameter Q_y_11 Ii fl er Result DL RL !!.i!L.._PF DF Anal st Date Time Batch Method
;em i-Volatile-GC/MS
,W846 3510C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) ''As Received"
Benzo(ghi )pery Jene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 I
Benzo(k)fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 I
Butylbenzylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 I
Chrysene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 I
Di-n-butylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 I
Di-n-octylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 I
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 I
Diethylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 I
Dimethylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100 I
Dipheny !amine u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
Fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 I
Fluorene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 I
Hexachlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 I
Hexachlorobutadiene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 I
Hexachlorocyclopentadi u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 J
ene
Hexachloroethane u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Isophorone u ND 35.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
N-Methyl-N-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
nitrosomethy !amine
N-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Nitrosodipropy I amine
Naphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Nitro benzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Pentachlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Phenanthrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Phenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Pyridine u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
bis(2-Chloro-l-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
methylethyl)ether
bis(2-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Chloroethoxy)methane
bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
bis(2-u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Ethylhexy l)phthalate
m,p-Cresols u ND 37.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
o-Cresol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Page 52 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Report Date: September 29, 2020
Contact:
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Cell 4A LDS
519405004
Proiect: DNMI00107
Client ID: DNMIOO I
>arameter ualifier Result _____ =D~L~---~R=L~---~U-n-it~s _P~F~-DF Anal t Date Time Batch Method
,em i-Volatile-GC/MS
,W846 3510C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) "As Received"
Surrogatellracer recovery
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Phenol-d5
2-Fluorobiphenyl
Nitrobenzene-d5
2-Fluorophenol
p-Terphenyl-d 14
Result
1090 ug/L
321 ug/L
371 ug/L
393 ug/L
445 ug/L
476 ug/L
Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) CAS No.
unknown
unknown
unknown
Tributyl phosphate 000126-73-8
1-Hexanamine, 2-ethyl-N-(2-ethylhe 000106-20-7
Nominal
1000
1000
500
500
1000
500
RT
1.981
5.618
9.859
10.448
11.127
Recovery% Acceptable Limits
109 (32%-122%)
32 (15%-91%)
74 (31%-107%)
79 (35%-113%)
44 (15%-88%)
95 (35%-134%)
Est. Concentration Fit
1370 ug/L 0
128 ug/L 0
41.7 ug/L 0
41 ug/L 91
42 ug/L 91
The following Pre Methods were erform_ec_l _________________ _
Method Description Analyst Date
SW846 3510C 3510C BNA Liq. Prep-8270 Analysis AS2 08/26/20
The followin Anal tical Methods were erformed
Qua[
J
J
J
NJ
NJ
Time
0205
Method Description Analyst Comments ---------------SW846 3510C/8270D
Date Time: 08127/200018
Date Time: 08/27/200018
Prep Batch
2033647
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Notes:
Column headers are defined as follows:
DF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Page 53 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: September 18, 2020
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Tailings 2020 Characterization ----
Parameter
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Cell4A LDS
519405004
Water
19-AUG-20 09:35
21-AUG-20
Client
Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC ----------Iigh Rad Testing
\lphaspec Th, Liquid "As Received"
:horium-228 U -27.1
:horium-230 39500
'.horium-232 U 317
JFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
}ross Radium Alpha 5450
Jucas Cell, Ra226, liquid "As Received"
tadium-226 18.6
J-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 "As Received"
Jranium-233/234
Jranium-235/236
Jranium-238
19000
711
16600
rhe following Prep Methods were performed:
+/-158 696
+/-1680 652
+/-192 526
+/-227 80.0
+/-5.64 12.7
+/-1110 658
+/-251 237
+/-1030 421
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00107
DNMI001
RL Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method ---
1.00 pCi/L
1.00 pCi/L
1.00 pCi/L
1.00 pCi/L
1.00 pCi/L
1.00 pCi/L
1.00 pCi/L
1.00 pCi/L
JXB7 09/03/20 0717 2033149
AXM6 09/10/20 0737 2033151
MXH8 09/10/20 0902 2033152
JXB7 09/02/20 1134 2033150
2
3
4
\1ethod Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch
,L-RAD-A-026 Laboratory Composite 2032694
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
\1ethod Descri tion _________________ A_n~a'---1 st Comments ----------
DOE EML HASL-300, Th-01-RC Modified
EPA 903.0
EPA 903.1 Modified
DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified
,urrogate/Tracer Recovery Test
rhorium-229 Tracer
3arium Carrier
Jranium-232 Tracer
llotes:
Alphaspec Th, Liquid "As Received"
GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 "As Received"
=ounting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (I-sigma).
Result Nominal Recovery%
91.9
102
96.7
Acceptable Limits
(15%-125%)
(25%-125%)
(15%-125%)
,RL = Sample Reporting Limi.t. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adju ted MDL or the CRDL.
Page 108 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Company :
Address:
Contact:
Project: -----Client Sample ID :
Sample ID:
Certificate of Analysis
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Tailings 2020 Characterization ---Cell4A LDS
519405004
Project:
Client ID :
Report Date: September 18, 2020
DNMJ00107
DNMJOOl
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty ----------'-_M_D_C ___ RL ____ U_n_i_ts_ PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
Column headers are defined as follows:
OF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Page 109 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: September 15, 2020
Company:
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Tailings 2020 Characterization -----· Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Cell4A LDS
519405004
Water
19-AUG-20 09:35
21-AUG-20
Client
Parameter Qualifier Result ----
-Iazardous Waste
\STM D 5057 Specific Gravity "As Received"
ipecific Gravity 1.07
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
DL RL
0.0100 0.100
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00107
DNMI001
Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
none I VHI 08/26/20 1015 2033728
------------------------------\.1 et hod ~D_e_s_cr_i,;..t_io'-n ___________________ ~Ac...c=na=l'"'y_=st'""""'C=-.co=m=m=en=t~s __________ _
ASTMD 5057
"Jotes:
;RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Column headers are defined as follows:
DF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Page 91 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
EN:RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data.
www.energylab.com
Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515
Gillette, WY 866.686.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Report Date: 09/09/20
Project: Annual Tailings 2020 Collection Date: 08/19/20 10:00
Lab ID: C20080962-005 Date Received: 08/21/20
Client Sample ID: Cell 48 Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
Analyses Result Units Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date / By
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03 ND mg/L 5 A2320 B 08/24/20 20:29 I dmb
Bicarbonate as HC03 ND mg/L 5 A2320 B 08/24/20 20:29 I dmb
Chloride 10200 mg/L D 100 E300.0 08/24/2021 :06 / dmb
Fluoride 1730 mg/L D 50 A4500-F C 08/24/20 12:01 / dmb
Sulfate 97200 mg/L D 400 E300.0 08/24/20 21 :06 / dmb
Calcium 628 mg/L D 30 E200.7 08/24/20 15:57 I meh
Magnesium 4520 mg/L E200.7 08/24/20 15:57 / meh
Potassium 1680 mg/L D 20 E200.7 08/24/20 15:57 I meh
Sodium 17100 mg/L D 50 E200.7 08124120 15:57 I meh
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Conductivity@ 25 C 87300 umhos/cm E 5 A2510 B 08/21120 14:21 / kjp
pH 2.24 s.u. H 0.01 A4500-H B 08121/20 14:21 I kjp
pH Measurement Temp 16 ·c A4500-H B 08/21/20 14:21 / kjp
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS@ 180 C 150000 mg/L D 2000 A2540 C 08121/20 12:161 kjp
NUTRIENTS
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 70.0 mg/L D 0.2 E353.2 08124/20 16:25 / dmb
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 6580 mg/L D 1000 E350.1 08126120 10:00 I hat
METALS, DISSOLVED
Arsenic 67900 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08/25/20 19:38 I jcg
Beryllium 455 ug/L D 60 E200.7 08/24120 15:57 I meh
Cadmium 1800 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08125/20 19:38 / jcg
Chromium 9350 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08/25/20 19:38 I jcg
Cobalt 30900 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08125/20 19:38 I jcg
Copper 602000 ug/L D 1000 E200.8 08125120 19:38 / jcg
Iron 3690000 ug/L D 5000 E200.8 08/25120 19:38 / jcg
Lead 8150 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08/25120 19:38 / jcg
Manganese 201000 ug/L D 100 E200.7 08/24120 15:57 I meh
Mercury 0.40 ug/L 0.2 E245.1 09/03/20 16:05 / eet-d
Molybdenum 8110 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08125120 19:38 I jcg
Nickel 56400 ug/L D 300 E200.8 08/25/20 19:38 I jcg
Selenium 3540 ug/L D 200 E200.8 08/25120 19:38 / jcg
Silver 76 ug/L D 40 E200.8 08/25/20 19:38 / jcg
Thallium 165 ug/L D 10 E200.8 09/01120 22:36 I jcg
Tin 138 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08/25120 19:38 I jcg
Uranium 47400 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08/25/20 19:38 I jcg
Vanadium 113000 ug/L D 1000 E200.8 08125/20 19:38 I jcg
Zinc 334000 ug/L D 3000 E200.8 08125/20 19:38 / jcg
*** Dissolved Mercury subbed to Test America.
DATA QUALITY
Solids, Total Dissolved -Calculated 130000 mg/L A1030 E 08/26/20 10:141 jlw
Report RL -Analyte Reporting Limit MCL -Maximum Contaminant Level
Definitions: QCL -Quality Control Limit ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL)
D -Reporting Limit (RL) increased due to sample matrix E -Estimated value -result exceeds the instrument upper
quantitation limit
H -Analysis performed past the method holding time
Page 11 of 54
EN:RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data.
www.energylab.com
Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515
GIiiette, WY 866.888.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: Annual Tailings 2020
Lab ID: C20080962-005
Client Sample ID: Cell 48
Analyses
DATA QUALITY
A/C Balance
Anions
Cations
Cation/Anion Balance includes selected metals
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte Reporting Limit
QCL -Quality Control Limit
Result Units
-10.7 %
2410 meq/L
1950 meq/L
Qualifiers RL
MCL/
Report Date: 09/09/20
Collection Date: 08/19/20 10:00
DateReceived: 08/21/20
Matrix: Aqueous
QCL Method Analysis Date / By
A1030 E
A1030 E
A1030 E
08/26/20 10:14 / jlw
08/26/20 10:14 / jlw
08/26/20 10:14 / jlw
MCL -Maximum Contaminant Level
ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL)
Page 12 of 54
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: September 14, 2020
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization -------------------Client Sample ID: Cell 4B
Sample ID: 519405005
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Water
19-AUG-20 10:00
21-AUG-20
Client
Project: DNMI00107
Client ID: DNMI001
Parameter Qualifier Result DL RL Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method ---------v'olatile Organics
;w846 8260B Volatiles "As Received"
:-Butanone U ND
~cetone 12.7
lenzene
:arbon tetrachloride
:hloroform
u
u
u
ND
ND
ND
:J1loromethane 1.28
v1ethylene chloride U ND
~aphthalene U ND
:etrahydrofuran U ND
:oluene U ND
<ylenes (total) U ND
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
1.67
1.74
0.333
0.333
0.333
0.333
l.67
0.333
1.67
0.333
1.00
----
5.00 ug/L MXL2 08/26/20
5.00 ug/L
1.00 ug/L
1.00 ug/L
1.00 ug/L
1.00 ug/L
5.00 ug/L
1.00 ug/L
5.00 ug/L
1.00 ug/L
3.00 ug/L
\1ethod Descri tion -------------------=An=ah::st Comments
SW846 82608
,wi-ogaterrracer Recover)'_ Test_______ _ ________ R_e_s_ult
,2-Dichloroethane-d4 SW846 82608 Volatiles "As Received"
3romofl uorobenzene
roluene-d8
lfotes:
SW846 8260B Volatiles "As Received"
SW846 8260B Volatiles "As Received"
56.4 ug/L
45.1 ug/L
50.5 ug/L
Nominal
50.0
50.0
50.0
Recove %
113
90
101
1207 2033589
Acceptable Limits
(71%-134%)
(70%-131%)
(74%-124%)
,RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Column headers are defined as follows:
OF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Page 23 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: September 29, 2020
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization
Client Sample ID: Cell 4B Proiect: DNMI00107
Sample ID: 519405005 Client ID: DNMI001
Matrix: Water
Collect Date: 19-AUG-20 10:00
Receive Date: 21-AUG-20
Collector: Client
•ammeter ualifier Result DL RL Units PF DF Anal st Date Time Batch Method
iem i-V olatile-GC/MS
!W846 35JOC/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) ''As Received"
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 AGSl 08/27/20 0046 2033648
1,2-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
I ,2-Diphenylhydrazine u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
I ,3-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
1,4-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
1-Methy !naphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
2,4-Dichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
2,4-Dimethylphenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
2,4-Dinitrophenol u ND 50.0 200 ug/L 0.0100
2,4-Dinitrotoluene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
2,6-Dinitrotoluene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
2-Chloronaphthalene u ND 4.10 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
2-Chlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
2-Methyl-4,6-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
dinitrophenol
2-Methy !naphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
2-Nitrophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine u ND 33.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
4-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Bromophenylphenylethe
r
4-Chloro-3-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
methylphenol
4-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Chlorophenylphenylethe
r
4-Nitrophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Acenaphthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Acenaphthylene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Benzi dine u ND 39.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Benzo( a )anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Benzo(a)pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Benzo(b )fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Page 54 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: September 29, 2020
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization
Client Sample ID: Cell 4B Proiect: DNMI00107
Sample ID: 519405005 Client ID: DNMI001
'ariuneter ualili~esult DL RL Units PF OF Anal t Date Time Batch Method
,emi-Volatile-GC/MS
1W846 35JOC/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) "As Received"
Benzo(ghi)perylene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Benzo(k)fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Butylbenzylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100
Chrysene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Di-n-butylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100
Di-n-octylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Diethylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100
Dimethylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100
Diphenylamine u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Fluorene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Hexachlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Hexachlorobutadiene u ND 30.0 JOO ug/L 0.0100
Hexachlorocyclopentadi u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
ene
Hexachloroethane u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Isophorone u ND 35.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
N-Methyl-N-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
nitrosomethy !amine
N-u ND 30.0 JOO ug/L 0.0100
Nitrosodipropy lamine
Naphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Nitro benzene u ND 30.0 JOO ug/L 0.0100
Pentachlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Phenanthrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Phenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Pyridine u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
bis(2-Chloro-1-u ND 30.0 JOO ug/L o.oioo
methylethyl)ether
bis(2-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Chloroethoxy )methane
bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
bis(2-u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Ethy lhexy I )phthalate
m,p-Cresols u ND 37.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
o-Cresol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Page 55 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Report Date: September 29, 2020
Contact:
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
>aramet=er~ ____ Qualilier R~
;em i-Volatile-GC/MS
Cell 4B
519405005
DL
iW846 35JOC/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) "As Received"
Surrogate/Tracer recovery
Phenol-d5
2-Fluorobiphenyl
Nitrobenzene-d5
2-Fluorophenol
p-Terphenyl-dl4
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Result
338 ug/L
362 ug/L
388 ug/L
427 ug/L
458 ug/L
840 ug/L
Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) CAS No.
Butane, 2-methoxy-2-rnethyl-000994-05-8
unknown
unknown
unknown
2(3H)-Furanone, 5-ethyldihydro-
unknown
unknown
Undecane
unknown
unknown
Undecane, 3,6-dimethyl-
unknown
unknown
Tridecane
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
Tetradecane
unknown
unknown
000695-06-7
001120-21-4
017301-28-9
000629-50-5
000629-59-4
Pentadecane 000629-62-9
Hexadecane 000544-76-3
Tributyl phosphate 000126-73-8
Heptadecane 000629-78-7
Page 56 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Nominal
1000
500
500
1000
500
1000
RT
1.981
5.688
5.752
5.832
5.928
6.089
6.196
6.383
6.42
6.912
7.426
7.757
7.811
8.143
8.266
8.517
8.619
8.672
8.886
9.185
9.292
9.56
10.196
10.448
10.79
Project: DNMI00107
Client ID: DNMIOO I
RL Units PF DF Anal st Date Time Batch Method
Recovery% Acceptable Limits Date Time: 08/27/2000 46
34 (15%-91%)
72 (31%-107%)
78 (35%-113%)
43 (15%-88%)
92 (35%-134%)
84 (32%-122%)
Est. Concentration Fit Qua/ Date Time: 08/27120 00 46
1320 ug/L 74 J
60.7 ug/L 0 J
95.3 ug/L 0 J
1180 ug/L 0 J
76.4 ug/L 86 NJ
64.5 ug/L 0 J
188 ug/L 0 J
158 ug/L 95 NJ
114 ug/L 0 J
67.6 ug/L 0 J
74.2 ug/L 94 NJ
89.7 ug/L 0 J
89.9 ug/L 0 J
243 ug/L 96 NJ
59.3 ug/L 0 J
165 ug/L 0 J
85.2 ug/L 0 J
59 ug/L 0 J
202 ug/L 98 NJ
109ug/L 0 J
97.3 ug/L 0 J
135 ug/L 95 NJ
146ug/L 98 NJ
143 ug/L 91 NJ
170 ug/L 98 NJ
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Tailings 2020 Characterization
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Cell 4B
519405005
'arameter __ Qualifier ResuJt DL
,em i-Volatile-GC/MS
>W846 35JOC/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) "As Received"
1-Hexanamine, 2-ethyl-N-(2-ethylhe
unknown
1-0ctanamine, N,N-dioctyl-
unknown
unknown
000106-20-7
001116-76-3
The followin Methods were erformed
11.159
12.186
13.732
14.652
16.16
-~-·-----~------------Method Description
SW846 3510C 3510C BNA Liq. Prep-8270 Analysis
Report Date: September 29, 2020
Proiect: DNMI00107
Client ID: DNMIOO 1
RL __ _,U"'"n.its PF DF Analrst Date Time Batch Method
295 ug/L 90 NJ
113 ug/L 0 J
83.8 ug/L 87 NJ
81.7 ug/L 0 J
92.7 ug/L 0 J
Analyst Date Time Prep Batch
AS2 08/26/20 0205 2033647
The followin Anal tical Methods were p_e_ri_o_rrn_ed _______________ _
Method Description Analyst Comments
SW846 3510C/8270D
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Notes:
Column headers are defined as follows:
DF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Page 57 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: September 18, 2020
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization -------Client Sample ID: Cell 4B
Sample ID: 519405005
Matrix: Water
Collect Date: 19-AUG-20 10:00
Receive Date:
Collector:
21-AUG-20
Client
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty
1igh Rad Testing
\lphaspec Th, Liquid "As Received"
:horium-228
:horium-230
1280
6.06E+05
:horium-232 4320
JFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
}ross Radium Alpha 54500
.ucas Cell, Ra226, liquid "As Received"
tadium-226 360
J. 233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 "As Received"
Jranium-233/234
Jranium-235/236
17000
1080
Jranium-238 17700
rhe following Prep Methods were performed:
+/-302
+/-5790
+/-498
+/-702
+/-19.7
+/-1020
+/-300
+/-1040
MDC
584
522
432
104
15.9
611
413
289
RL
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00107
DNMI001
-------------------
Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
JX87 09/03/20 0717 2033149
AXM6 09/10/20 0737 2033151
MXH8 09/10/20 0902 2033152
JXB7 09/02/20 1134 2033150
2
3
4
---------------vf e tho d Descdption Analyst Date Time Prep Batch
,L-RAD-A-026 Laboratory Composite 2032694
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method Descri tion --------------------~A~n~aly.st Comme11 ..... ts __________ _
DOE EML HASL-300, Th-OJ-RC Modified
EPA 903.0
EPA 903.1 Modified
DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified
,urrogate/Tracer Recovery Test
rhorium-229 Tracer
3arium Carrier
Jranium-232 Tracer
~otes:
Alphaspec Th, Liquid "As Received"
GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 "As Received"
::ounting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (I-sigma).
Result Nominal Recovery%
99.2
104
99.6
Acceptable Limits
(15%-125%)
(25%-125%)
(15%-125%)
,RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Page 110 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: September 18, 2020
Company:
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Tailings 2020 Characterization
Cell 4B
519405005
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC RL -------"---------
Column headers are defined as follows:
DF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Page 111 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00107
DNMIOOI
Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: September 15, 2020
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization --------------Client Sample ID: Cell 4B
Sample ID: 519405005
Matrix: Water
Collect Date: 19-AUG-20 10:00
Receive Date: 21-AUG-20
Collector: Client
Parameter Qualifier Result DL RL
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00107
DNMI001
Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method -------------fazardous Waste
\STM D 5057 Specific Gravity "As Received"
,pecific Gravity 1.11 0.0100 0.100 none 1 VHI 08/26/20 1015 2033728
The following Analytical Methods were performed: -----------------------------------------\1 et hod Description Analyst Comments
ASTMD 5057
'ifotes:
iRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Column headers are defined as follows:
DF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Page 92 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
EN:RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data.
www.energylab.com
Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515
Gillette, WY 866.686.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: Annual Tailings 2020
Lab ID: C20080962-006
Client Sample ID: Cell 48 LOS
Analyses Result Units Qualifiers
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03 ND mg/L
Bicarbonate as HC03 ND mg/L
Chloride 7630 mg/L D
Fluoride 1550 mg/L D
Sulfate 88700 mg/L D
Calcium 555 mg/L D
Magnesium 4830 mg/L
Potassium 1350 mg/L D
Sodium 12600 mg/L D
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Conductivity @ 25 C 77600 umhos/cm E
pH 1.89 s.u. H
pH Measurement Temp 17 oc
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS@ 180 C 134000 mg/L D
NUTRIENTS
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 39.5 mg/L D
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 5080 mg/L D
METALS, DISSOLVED
Arsenic 84900 ug/L D
Beryllium 483 ug/L D
Cadmium 2060 ug/L D
Chromium 9620 ug/L D
Cobalt 32200 ug/L D
Copper 500000 ug/L D
Iron 4180000 ug/L D
Lead 5110 ug/L D
Manganese 221000 ug/L D
Mercury 0.10 ug/L
Molybdenum 19800 ug/L D
Nickel 57900 ug/L D
Selenium 3950 ug/L D
Silver 173 ug/L D
Thallium 98 ug/L D
Tin 258 ug/L D
Uranium 34600 ug/L D
Vanadium 743000 ug/L D
Zinc 286000 ug/L D
*** Dissolved Mercury subbed to Test America.
DAT A QUALITY
Solids, Total Dissolved -Calculated 120000 mg/L
Report RL -Analyte Reporting Limit
Definitions: QCL -Quality Control Limit
D -Reporting Limit (RL) increased due to sample matrix
H -Analysis performed past the method holding time
MCU
RL QCL
5
5
100
50
400
30
20
50
5
0.01
1000
0.2
1000
100
60
100
100
100
1000
5000
100
100
0.2
100
300
200
40
10
200
100
1000
3000
Report Date: 09/09/20
Collection Date: 08/19/20 09:45
DateReceived: 08/21/20
Matrix: Aqueous
Method Analysis Date I By
A2320 B 08/24/20 20:34 I dmb
A2320 B 08/24/20 20:34 I dmb
E300.0 08/24/2021 :25 / dmb
A4500-F C 08/24/20 12:29 / dmb
E300.0 08/24/20 21 :25 / dmb
E200.7 08/24/20 16:01 / meh
E200.7 08/24/20 16:01 / meh
E200.7 08/24/20 16:01 / meh
E200.7 08/24/20 16:01 / meh
A2510 B 08/21 /20 14:24 / kjp
A4500-H B 08/21/20 14:24 / kjp
A4500-H B 08/21/20 14:24 / kjp
A2540 C 08/21/20 12:16 / kjp
E353.2 08/24/20 16:29 / dmb
E350.1 08/26/20 10:01 / hat
E200.8 08/25/20 19:43 I jcg
E200.7 08/24/20 16:01 / meh
E200.8 08/25/20 19:43 I jcg
E200.8 08/25/20 19:43 I jcg
E200.8 08/25/20 19:43 I jcg
E200.8 08/25/20 19:43 I jcg
E200.8 08/25/20 19:43 / jcg
E200.8 08/25/20 19:43 I jcg
E200.7 08/24/20 16:01 / meh
E245.1 09/03/20 16:07 / eet-d
E200.8 08/25/20 19:43 I jcg
E200.8 08/25/20 19:43 / jcg
E200.8 08/25/20 19:43 / jcg
E200.8 08/25/20 19:43 / jcg
E200.8 09/01/20 22:58 / jcg
E200.8 08/25/20 19:43 I jcg
E200.8 08/25/20 19:43 / jcg
E200.8 08/25/20 19:43 I jcg
E200.8 08/25/20 19:43 / jcg
A1030 E 08/26/20 10: 17 / jlw
MCL -Maximum Contaminant Level
ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL)
E -Estimated value -result exceeds the instrument upper
quantitation limit
Page 13 of 54
EN:RGY
'
Trust our People. Trust our Data.
www.energylab.com
BIiiings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515
Gillette, WY 886.688. 7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711
LABO RA TORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper. WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: Annual Tailings 2020
Lab ID: C20080962-006
Client Sample ID: Cell 48 LOS
Analyses
DATA QUALITY
A/C Balance
Anions
Cations
Cation/Anion Balance includes selected metals
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte Reporting Limit
QCL -Quality Control Limit
Result Units
-5.69 %
2150 meq/L
1920 meq/L
Qualifiers RL
MCU
Report Date: 09/09/20
Collection Date: 08/19/20 09:45
DateReceived: 08/21/20
Matrix: Aqueous
QCL Method Analysis Date / By
A1030 E
A1030 E
A1030 E
08/26/20 10:17 / jlw
08/26/20 10:17 I jlw
08/26/20 10:17 / jlw
MCL -Maximum Contaminant Level
ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL)
Page 14 of 54
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: September 14, 2020
Company :
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Tailings 2020 Characterization
Ce114B LDS
519405006
Water
19-AUG-20 09:45
21-AUG-20
Client
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00107
DNMI001
Parameter Qualifier Result DL RL Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method --------------------
volatile Organics
;w846 8260B Volatiles "As Received"
!-8utanone 42.8 1.67 5.00 ug/L MXL2 08/26/20
l.cetone 68.5 1.74 5.00 ug/L
lenzene u ND 0.333 1.00 ug/L
'.arbon tetrachloride u ND 0.333 1.00 ug/L
'.hloroform 1.22 0.333 1.00 ug/L
'.hloromethane u ND 0.333 1.00 ug/L
Jethylene chloride U ND 1.67 5.00 ug/L
~aphthalene U ND 0.333 1.00 ug/L
:etrahydrofuran 96.5 1.67 5.00 ug/L
:oluene U ND 0.333 1.00 ug/L
(ylenes (total) U ND 1.00 3.00 ug/L
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
_\1""'"e"'"'th~o~d'------~D=---.c.e.c...sc=r=i """t"'io=n=----------------------~A=n=al).'.st Comments
SW846 82608
;urrogate/Tracer Recovery
,2-Dichloroethane-d4
lromofluorobenzene
[oluene-d8
'ifotes:
Test
SW846 82608 Volatiles "As Received"
SW846 82608 Volatiles "As Received"
SW846 82608 Volatiles "As Received"
Result
54.l ug/L
49.8 ug/L
50.l ug/L
Nominal
50.0
50.0
50.0
Recovery%
108
100
JOO
1233 2033589
Acceptable Limits
(71%-134%)
(70%-131%)
(74%-124%)
;RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Column headers are defined as follows:
DF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Page 24 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: September 29, 2020
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization
Client Sample ID: Cell4B LDS Proiect: DNMI00107
Sample ID: 519405006 Client ID: DNMI001
Matrix: Water
Collect Date: 19-AUG-20 09:45
Receive Date: 21-AUG-20
Collector: Client
'arameter ualifier Result DL RL Units PF DF Anal st Date Time Batch Method
iem i-Volatile-GC/MS
1W846 351OC/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) ''As Received"
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 AGSl 08/27/20 0115 2033648
1,2-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
1,2-Dipheny !hydrazine u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
1,3-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
1,4-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
1-Methy !naphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
2,4-Dichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
2,4-Dimethy !phenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
2,4-Dinitrophenol u ND 50.0 200 ug/L 0.0100
2,4-Dinitrotoluene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
2,6-Dinitrotoluene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
2-Chloronaphthalene u ND 4.10 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
2-Chlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
2-Methyl-4,6-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
dinitrophenol
2-Methy !naphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
2-Nitrophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine u ND 33.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
4-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Bromopheny lphenylethe
r
4-Chloro-3-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
methylphenol
4-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Chloropheny lpheny lethe
r
4-Nitrophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 J
Acenaphthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 I
Acenaphthy Jene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 I
Anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 I.
Benzidine u ND 39.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 I
Benzo( a )anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 I
Benzo( a )pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 I
Benzo(b )fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 I
Page 58 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: September 29, 2020
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization
Client Sample ID: Cell 4B LDS Proiect: DNMI00107
Sample ID: 519405006 Client ID: DNMI001
'arameter Qualifier Result DL RL Units PF DF Ana!YJt Date Time Batch Method
,emi-Volatile-GC/MS
iW846 3510C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) ''.As Received"
Benzo(ghi)pery Jene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Benzo(k)fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Butylbenzylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100
Chrysene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Di-n-butylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100
Di-n-octylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100
Dibenzo( a,h )anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Diethylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100
Dimethylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100
Dipheny !amine u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Fluorene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Hexachlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Hexachlorobutadiene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Hexachlorocyclopentadi u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
ene
Hexachloroethane u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Isophorone u ND 35.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
N-Methyl-N-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
nitrosomethylamine
N-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Nitrosodipropylamine
Naphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Nitrobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Pentachlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Phenanthrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Phenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Pyridine u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
bis(2-Chloro-1-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
methy lethy I )ether
bis(2-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Chloroethoxy )methane
bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
bis(2-30.4 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Ethy lhexy I )phthalate
m,p-Cresols u ND 37.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
o-Cresol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Page 59 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Report Date: September 29, 2020
Contact:
Project:
>arameter
lem i-Volatile-GC/MS
Tailings 2020 Characterization
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
ualifier Result
Cell 4B LDS
519405006
DL
iW846 35JOC/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) ''As Received"
Surrogate/Tracer recovery
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Phenol-d5
2-Fluorobiphenyl
Nitrobenzene-d5
2-Fluorophenol
p-Terphenyl-dl4
Result
1050 ug/L
305 ug/L
357 ug/L
378 ug/L
421 ug/L
458 ug/L
Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) CAS No.
unknown
unknown
unknown
1 (3H)-Isobenzofuranone
1,4-Benzenediamine, N ,N-diethy !-
unknown
unknown
1-Hexanamine, 2-ethyl-N-(2-ethylhe
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
000087-41-2
000093-05-0
000106-20-7
The followin Methods were erformed
Method Description
Nominal
1000
1000
500
500
1000
500
RT
1.981
5.757
5.816
8.613
9.389
10.282
11.057
11.132
11.32
11.737
12.074
13.02
SW846 3510C 3510C BNA Liq. Prep-8270 Analysis
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
SW846 3510C/8270D
Proiect: DNMI00107
Client ID: DNMI001
RL Units PF DF Anal st Date Time Batch Method
Recovery% Acceptable Limits Date Time: 08/27/20 0115
105 (32%-122%)
31 (15%-91%)
71 (31%-107%)
76 (35%-113%)
42 (15%-88%)
92 (35%-134%)
Est. Concentration Fit Qua/ Date Time: 08/27/2001 15
1190 ug/L 0 J
74.6 ug/L 0 J
300 ug/L 0 J
60.8 ug/L 97 NJ
276 ug/L 98 NJ
l lOug/L 0 J
43.8 ug/L 0 J
104 ug/L 90 NJ
51 ug/L 0 J
58.2 ug/L 0 J
78.8 ug/L 0 J
40.5 ug/L 0 J
Analyst Date Time Prep Batch
AS2 08/26/20 0205 2033647
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Notes:
Page 60 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Report Date: September 29, 2020
Contact:
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
>aramctcr ualifier Result
Column headers are defined as follows:
DF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Page 61 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Cell 4B LDS
519405006
DL
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
RL
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
Proiect: DNMI00107
Client ID: DNMIOO 1
Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Cell4B LDS
519405006
Water
19-AUG-20 09:45
21-AUG-20
Client
Parameter Qualifier ----------"-Result Uncertainty
-Iigh Rad Testing
\lphaspec Th, Liquid "As Received"
:horium-228 888 +/-249
:horium-230 5.41E+05 +/-5570
'horium-232 4070 +/-493
]FPC,Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
}ross Radium Alpha 54100 +/-680
.ucas Cell, Ra226, liquid "As Received"
tadium-226 153 +/-12. 7
J-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 "As Received"
Jranium-233/234 11700 +/-861
Jranium-235/236 749 +/-256
Jranium-238 14500 +/-954
[he following Prep Methods were performed:
v1ethod Description
}L-RAD-A-026 Laboratory Composite
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method Description
DOE EML HASL-300, Th-01-RC Modified
EPA 903.0
EPA 903.1 Modified
DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified
;urrogate/Tracer Recovery Test
Alphaspec Th, Liquid "As Received"
MDC
451
553
447
86.6
9.87
582
368
481
rhorium-229 Tracer
3arium Carrier
Jranium-232 Tracer
GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 "As Received"
~otes:
RL
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Analyst
:ounting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (}-sigma).
Project:
Client ID:
Report Date: September 18, 2020
DNMI00107
DNMI001
Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
Date
Result
JXB7 09/03/20 0717 2033149
AXM6 09/10/20 0740 2033151 2
MXH8 09/10/20 0902 2033152 3
JXB7 09/02/20 1134 2033150 4
Time Prep Batch
2032694
Analyst Comments
Nominal Recovery%
94
104
103
------~
Acceptable Limits
(15%-125%)
(25%-125%)
(15%-125%)
;RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Page 112 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: September 18, 2020
Company:
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Tailings 2020 Characterization
Cell4B LDS
519405006
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC ---------------
Column headers are defined as follows:
DF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00107
DNMI001
-------------
RL Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method --------
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
Page 113 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Company :
Address:
Certificate of Analysis
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization -------------------------Client Sample ID: Cell 4B LDS Project:
Sample ID: 519405006 Client ID:
Matrix: Water
Collect Date: l 9-AUG-20 09:45
Receive Date: 21-AUG-20
Collector: Client
Report Date: September 15, 2020
DNMI00107
DNMIOOI
----------------------
Parameter Qualifier Result DL RL Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method ---------------Iazardous Waste
\.STM D 5057 Specific Gravity "As Received"
,pecific Gravity 1.11 0.0100 0.100 none I VHI 08/26/20 IO 15 2033 728
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method Descri tion
ASTMD 5057
'fotes:
iRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Column headers are defined as foJlows :
OF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Page 93 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
EN:RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data.
www.energylab.com
Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515
Gillette, WY 866.686.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Report Date: 09/09/20
Project: Annual Tailings 2020 Collection Date: 08/19/20 09: 15
Lab ID: C20080962-007 DateReceived: 08/21/20
Client Sample ID: Cell 65 Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
Analyses Result Units Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date / By
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03 ND mg/L 5 A2320 B 08/24/20 20:37 I dmb
Bicarbonate as HC03 ND mg/L 5 A2320 B 08/24/20 20:37 I dmb
Chloride 8670 mg/L D 100 E300.0 08/24/2021 :44 I dmb
Fluoride 1640 mg/L D 50 A4500-F C 08/24/20 12:34 / dmb
Sulfate 81900 mg/L D 400 E300.0 08/24/20 21 :44 I dmb
Calcium 594 mg/L D 30 E200.7 08/24/20 16:05 I meh
Magnesium 4330 mg/L E200.7 08/24/20 16:05 / meh
Potassium 1540 mg/L D 20 E200.7 08/24/20 16:05 / meh
Sodium 16300 mg/L D 50 E200.7 08/24/20 16:05 / meh
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Conductivity @ 25 C 83300 umhos/cm E 5 A2510 B 08/21/2014:27 / kjp
pH 2.28 s.u. H 0.01 A4500-H B 08/21/20 14:27 / kjp
pH Measurement Temp 18 oc A4500-H B 08/21/20 14:27 / kjp
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS@ 180 C 137000 mg/L D 2000 A2540 C 08/21/20 12:17 / kjp
NUTRIENTS
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 81.0 mg/L D 0.5 E353.2 08/24/20 16:32 / dmb
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 10800 mg/L D 1000 E350.1 08/26/20 10:03 / hat
METALS, DISSOLVED
Arsenic 61900 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08/25/20 19:49 / jcg
Beryllium 441 ug/L D 60 E200.7 08/24/20 16:05 I meh
Cadmium 3060 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08/25/20 19:49 / jcg
Chromium 7990 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08/25/20 19:49 / jcg
Cobalt 28700 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08/25/20 19:49 / jcg
Copper 543000 ug/L D 1000 E200.8 08/25/20 19:49 / jcg
Iron 3250000 ug/L D 5000 E200.8 08/25/20 19:49 / jcg
Lead 7780 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08/25/20 19:49 / jcg
Manganese 193000 ug/L D 100 E200.7 08/24/20 16:05 I meh
Mercury 3.4 ug/L 0.2 E245.1 09/03/20 16:14 / eet-d
Molybdenum 26200 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08/25/20 19:49 / jcg
Nickel 51500 ug/L D 300 E200.8 08/25/20 19:49 / jcg
Selenium 3200 ug/L D 200 E200.8 08/25/20 19:49 I jcg
Silver 424 ug/L D 40 E200.8 08/25/20 19:49 / jcg
Thallium 104 ug/L D 10 E200.8 09/01/20 23:02 I jcg
Tin ND ug/L D 200 E200.8 08/25/20 19:49 / jcg
Uranium 38800 ug/L D 100 E200.8 08/25/20 19:49 I jcg
Vanadium 183000 ug/L D 1000 E200.8 08/25/20 19:49 / jcg
Zinc 310000 ug/L D 3000 E200.8 08/25/20 19:49 / jcg
••• Dissolved Mercury subbed to Test America.
DATA QUALITY
Solids, Total Dissolved -Calculated 120000 mg/L A1030 E 08/26/20 10:09 I jlw
Report RL -Analyte Reporting Limit MCL -Maximum Contaminant Level
Definitions: QCL -Quality Control Limit ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL)
D -Reporting Limit (RL) increased due to sample matrix E -Estimated value -result exceeds the instrument upper
quantitation limit
H -Analysis performed past the method holding time
Page 15 of 54
EN:RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data.
www.energylab.com
Billlngs, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515
Gillette, WY 888.688.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: Annual Tailings 2020
Lab ID: C20080962-007
Client Sample ID: Cell 65
Analyses
DATA QUALITY
A/C Balance
Anions
Cations
Cation/Anion Balance includes selected metals
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte Reporting Limit
QCL -Quality Control Limit
Result Units
-5.94 %
2040 meq/L
1820 meq/L
Qualifiers RL
MCU
Report Date: 09/09/20
Collection Date: 08/19/20 09: 15
DateReceived: 08/21/20
Matrix: Aqueous
QCL Method Analysis Date / By
A1030 E
A1030 E
A1030 E
08/26/20 10:09 / jlw
08/26/20 10:09 / jlw
08/26/20 10:09 / jlw
MCL -Maximum Contaminant Level
ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL)
Page 16 of 54
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: September 14, 2020
Company:
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy W einel
Tailings 2020 Characterization ------~------Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Cell65
519405007
Water
19-AUG-20 09:15
21-AUG-20
Client
Parameter Qualifier Result ---------to I at i I e Organics
;w846 8260B Volatiles "As Received"
'.-8utanone U ND
\cetone 14.7
lenzene
:arbon tetrachloride
u
u
ND
ND
:hloroform 1.53
'.hloromethane 1.86
v1ethylene chloride U ND
~aphthalene U ND
:etrahydrofuran U ND
:oluene U ND
(ylenes (total) U ND
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
DL RL
1.67 5.00
1.74 5.00
0.333 1.00
0.333 1.00
0.333 1.00
0.333 1.00
1.67 5.00
0.333 1.00
1.67 5.00
0.333 1.00
1.00 3.00
Project:
Client ID:
Units PF
DNMI00107
DNMI001
OF Analyst Date ----
ug/L MXL2 08/26/20
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
------------------\1 et hod Descri tion Anal st Comments
SW846 82608
;urrogate/Tracer Recovery Test Result Nominal Recovery%
,2-Dichloroethane-d4 SW846 82608 Volatiles "As Received" 54.0 ug/L 50.0 108
lromofluorobenzene SW846 8260B Volatiles "As Received" 48.9 ug/L 50.0 98
roluene-d8 SW846 8260B Volatiles "As Received" 49.5 ug/L 50.0 99
~otes:
Time Batch Method
1259 2033589
Acceptable Limits
(71%-134%)
(70%-131%)
(74%-124%)
;RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Column headers are defined as follows:
DF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Page 25 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: September 29, 2020
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization
Client Sample ID: Cell 65 Proiect: DNMI00107
Sample ID: 519405007 Client ID: DNMIOOI
Matrix: Water
Collect Date: 19-AUG-20 09:15
Receive Date: 21-AUG-20
Collector: Client
>arameter ualifier Result DL RL Units PF DF Anal st Date Time Batch Method
,em i-Volatile-GC/MS
,W846 35JOC/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) ''As Received"
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 AGSl 08/27/20 0144 2033648
1,2-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
1,3-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
1,4-Dichlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
1-Methylnaphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
2,4-Dichlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
2,4-Dimethylphenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
2,4-Dinitrophenol u ND 50.0 200 ug/L 0.0100
2,4-Dinitrotoluene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
2,6-Dinitrotoluene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
2-Chloronaphthalene u ND 4.10 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
2-Chlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
2-Methyl-4,6-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
dinitrophenol
2-Methy !naphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
2-Nitrophenol ·U ND 30.0 ·100 ug/L 0.0100
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine u ND 33.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
4-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Bromophenylphenylethe
r
4-Chloro-3-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
methyl phenol
4-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Chlorophenylphenylethe
r
4-Nitrophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Acenaphthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Acenaphthylene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Benzi dine u ND 39.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Benzo( a )anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Benzo( a )pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Benzo(b )fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Page 62 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: September 29, 2020
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization
Client Sample ID: Cell 65 Proiect: DNMI00107
Sample ID: 519405007 Client ID: DNMI001
•arameter Qualifier Result DL RL Units PF DF Anal st Date Time Batch Method
,emi-Volatile-GC/MS
,W846 35JOC/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) "As Received"
Benzo(ghi)perylene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Benzo(k)fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
B utylbenzyl phthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100
Chrysene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Di-n-butylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100
Di-n-octylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100
Di benzo( a,h )anthracene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Diethylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100
Dimethylphthalate u ND 3.00 100 ug/L 0.0100
Diphenylamine u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Fluoranthene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Fluorene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Hexachlorobenzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Hexachlorobutadiene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Hexachlorocyclopentadi u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
ene
Hexachloroethane u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Isophorone u ND 35.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
N-Methyl-N-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
nitrosomethy )amine
N-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Nitrosodipropylamine
Naphthalene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 1
Nitro benzene u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
Pentachlorophenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
Phenanthrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 1
Phenol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
Pyrene u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100 1
Pyridine u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
bis(2-Chloro-l-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100 1
methylethyl)ether
bis(2-u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Chloroethoxy )methane
bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
bis(2-u ND 3.00 10.0 ug/L 0.0100
Ethy lhexy I )phthalate
m,p-Cresols u ND 37.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
o-Cresol u ND 30.0 100 ug/L 0.0100
Page 63 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Report Date: September 29, 2020
Contact:
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Cell 65
519405007 -------
Proiect: DNMI00107
Client ID: DNMIOO I -----------
'arameter _____ ualifier Result -----=D""L"-------'R=L __ __,Ue.:n:.::its=--___,_P..e._F __ _,D=F,,___,Ace.n,.,.,a,.__,I st Date Time Batch Method
,em i-Vo latile-GC/MS
1W846 3510C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) "As Received"
Surrogate/Tracer recovery
Phenol-d5
2-Fluorobiphenyl
Nitrobenzene-d5
2-Fluorophenol
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
p-Terphenyl-d14
Result
334 ug/L
360 ug/L
362 ug/L
400 ug/L
424 ug/L
482 ug/L
Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) CAS No.
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
Heptanoic acid
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-propyl-
Octanoic Acid
2(3H)-Furanone, 5-butyldihydro-
l (3H)-lsobenzofuranone
unknown
Formamide, N-octyl-
Tributyl phosphate
I -Hexanamine,N-(2,2-dimethy lhexy I)
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
OOOll l-14-8
000105-21-5
000124-07-2
000104-50-7
000087-41-2
006282-06-0
000126-73-8
1000146-38-2
The followin Methods were erformed
Method Description
Page 64 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Nominal
1000
500
500
1000
1000
500
RT
1.981
5.693
5.757
5.826
5.928
6.008
6.26
6.918
7.121
7.832
8.618
9.1
9.185
10.448
ll.116
12.272
12.32
13.261
13.352
13.694
14.235
14.342
16.16
Recovery% Acceptable Limits Date Time: 08/27120 OJ 44
33 (15%-91%)
72 (31%-107%)
72 (35%-113%)
40 (15%-88%)
42 (32%-122%)
96 (35%-134%)
Est. Concentration Fit Qual Date Time: 08/27/2001 44
892 ug/L 0 J
49.8 ug/L 0 J
140 ug/L 0 J
874 ug/L 0 J
115 ug/L 0 J
166ug/L 0 J
454 ug/L 90 NJ
68.8 ug/L 91 NJ
242 ug/L 91 NJ
55.5 ug/L 91 NJ
69.2 ug/L 93 NJ
40.4 ug/L 0 J
94.6 ug/L 90 NJ
150ug/L 91 NJ
40.1 ug/L 91 NJ
50.3 ug/L 0 J
48.8 ug/L 0 J
48.8 ug/L 0 J
45.7 ug/L 0 J
72.2 ug/L 0 J
63.I ug/L 0 J
55.9 ug/L 0 J
220ug/L 0 J
Analyst Date Time Prep Batch
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), lnc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Tailings 2020 Characterization
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
CelJ 65
519405007
Report Date: September 29, 2020
Proiect: DNMI00107
Client ID: DNMIOO 1
>arameter Result DL _,R=L=-__ ..:,Uc..:cn=it=s-=-P=-F __ -.cDc...aF=--"A=n=alyst Date Time Batch Method
The followi'!g,,,_P_re_,_ ____ _._e_rfi_o_rm_ed ____________ _
Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch -----------------SW846 351 OC 351 OC BNA Liq. Prep-8270 Analysis AS2 08/26/20 0205 2033647
The followin Anal tical Methods were erformed ---'------------------------------------Method Description Analyst Comments
SW846 3510C/8270D
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Notes:
Column headers are defined as follows:
DF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Page 65 of 119 SDG: 519405 Rev 1
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: September 18, 2020
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization -------------Client Sample ID: Cell 65
Sample ID: 519405007
Matrix: Water
Collect Date: 19-AUG-20 09:15
Receive Date: 21-AUG-20
Collector: Client
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC
-iigh Rad Testing
\lphaspec Th, Liquid "As Received"
:horium-228 u 562 +/-254 707
:horium-230 4.88E+05 +/-5500 563
.'horium-232 2200 +/-390 541
]FPC,Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
]ross Radium Alpha 53700 +/-713 69.7
.ucas Cell, Ra226, liquid "As Received"
tadium-226 372 +/-23.0 10.8
J-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 "As Received"
Jranium-233/234 14100 +/-880 527
Jranium-235/236 1000 +/-277 440
Jranium-238 14300 +/-887 483
[he following Prep Methods were performed:
vtethod Description
]L-RAD-A-026 Laboratory Comp0sitc
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
\1ethod Descri tion
DOE EML HASL-300, Th-01-RC Modified
EPA 903.0
EPA 903.1 Modified
DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified
;urrogate/Tracer Recovery Test
rhorium-229 Tracer Alphaspec Th, Liquid "As Received"
3arium Carrier GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
Jranium-232 Tracer U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 "As Received"
IJotes:
RL
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Analyst
::ounting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (I-sigma).
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00107
DNMIOOI
Units PF DF Analyst Date
pCi/L JXB7 09/03/20
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L AXM6 09/10/20
pCi/L MXH8 09/10/20
pCi/L JXB7 09/02/20
pCi/L
pCi/L
Date Time Prep Batch
2032694
Anal st Comments
Result Nominal Recovery%
102
104
102
Time Batch Method
0717 2033149
0740 2033151 2
0902 2033152 3
1134 2033150 4
Acceptable Limits
(15%-125%)
(25%-125%)
(15%-125%)
;RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Page 114 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 5~6-8171 -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: September 18, 2020
Company :
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Contact: Ms. Kathy W einel
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization --------------Client Sample ID: Cell 65
Sample ID: 519405007
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC
Column headers are defined as follows:
DF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
---
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
RL
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
Page 115 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00107
DNMIOOI
Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: September 15, 2020
Company:
Address:
Contact:
Project: -----Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Tailings 2020 Characterization
Cell65
519405007
Water
19-AUG-20 09:15
21-AUG-20
Client
----
Parameter Qualifier Result DL RL
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00107
DNMI001
Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method ----------------fazardous Waste
\STM D 5057 Specific Gravity "As Received"
ipecific Gravity 1.11 0.0100 0.100 none 1 VHI 08/26/20 101 S 2033728
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method --=D=-e=s=c;..:;ric..t=io=n~ ___________________ An0-==--al st Comme=nt=s __________ _
ASTMD 5057
'fotes:
' ,RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Column headers are defined as follows:
DF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Page 94 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: September 14, 2020
Company :
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: Tailings 2020 Characterization ------------------Client Sample ID: Trip Blank
Sample ID: 519405008
Matrix: Water
Collect Date: 19-AUG-20 08:30
Receive Date: 21-AUG-20
Collector: Client
Parameter Qualifier Result DL -----
volatile Organics
iW846 8260B Volatiles "As Received"
'.-Butanone u ND 1.67
\cetone 5.80 1.74
lenzene u ND 0.333
:arbon tetrachloride u ND 0.333
:hloroform u ND 0.333
:hloromethane u ND 0.333
viethylene chloride u ND 1.67
faphthalene u ND 0.333
.'etrahydrofuran u ND l.67
:oluene U ND 0.333
(ylenes (total) U ND l.00
The following Analytical Methods were perfonned:
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00107
DNMI001
RL Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method ---------
5.00 ug/L MXL2 08/26/20 0510 2033589
5.00 ug/L
1.00 ug/L
1.00 ug/L
1.00 ug/L
1.00 ug/L
5.00 ug/L
1.00 ug/L
5.00 ug/L
1.00 ug/L
3.00 ug/L
-----~---------------\1 et hod Descri tion Anal st Comments
SW846 82608
iurrogate/Tracer Recovery Test ·-----Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits --------------------------~--,2-Dichloroethane-d4 SW846 82608 Volatiles "As Received" 50. 6 ug/L 50.0 101 (71%-134%)
lromofluorobenzene SW846 82608 Volatiles "As Received" SI.I ug/L 50.0 102 (70o/o-131%)
1oluene-d8 SW846 82608 Volatiles "As Received" 50.7 ug/L 50.0 101 (74%-124%)
'fotes:
iRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Column headers are defined as follows:
DF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Page 26 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
EI\ERGY Trust our People. Trust our Data.
www.energylab.com
Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.051
Gillette, WY 866.686.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.071
ANALYTICAL SUMMARY REPORT
September 09, 2020
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
225 Union Blvd Ste 600
Lakewood, CO 80228-1826
Work Order: C20080962
Project Name: Annual Tailings 2020
Quote ID: C5645
Energy Laboratories, Inc. Casper WY received the following 7 samples for Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc on 8/21/2020 for
analysis.
Lab ID Client Sample ID Collect Date Receive Date Matrix Test
C20080962-001 Cell 1 08/19/20 08:30 08/21/20 Aqueous Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
Acidity, Total as CaC03
Alkalinity
Anion -Cation Balance
Conductivity
Mercury, Dissolved
Fluoride
Anions by Ion Chromatography
pH Check for H2S04 Preserved
lnorganics
Metals pH check by the Laboratory
FIRST
Nitrogen, Ammonia
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
pH
Sample Filtering, Metals
Digestion, Mercury by CVAA
Solids, Total Dissolved
Solids, Total Dissolved -Calculated
C20080962-002 Cell 2 Slimes 08/19/20 08:50 08/21/20 Aqueous Same As Above
C20080962-003 Cell4A 08/19/20 09:15 08/21/20 Aqueous Same As Above
C20080962-004 Cell4A LOS 08/19/20 09:35 08/21/20 Aqueous Same As Above
C20080962-005 Cell48 08/19/20 10:00 08/21/20 Aqueous Same As Above
C20080962-006 Cell 48 LOS 08/19/20 09:45 08/21/20 Aqueous Same As Above
C20080962-007 Cell 65 08/19/20 09: 15 08/21/20 Aqueous Same As Above
The analyses presented in this report were performed by Energy Laboratories, Inc., 2393 Salt Creek Hwy., Casper, WY 82601,
unless otherwise noted. Any exceptions or problems with the analyses are noted in the Laboratory Analytical Report, the QA/QC
Summary Report, or the Case Narrative. Any issues encountered during sample receipt are documented in the Work Order Receipt
Checklist.
The results as reported relate only to the item(s) submitted for testing. This report shall be used or copied only in its entirety. Energy
Laboratories, Inc. is not responsible for the consequences arising from the use of a partial report.
If you have any questions regarding these test results, please contact your Project Manager .
Report Approved By:
Digitally signed by
Tracey Archer
Date: 2020.09.09 09:51 :48 -06:00
Page 1 of 54
EN:RGY ~ . Trust our People. Trust our Data.
www.energylab.com
Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515
Gillette, WY 866.686.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711
CLIENT:
Project:
Work Order:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Annual Tailings 2020
C20080962
ORIGINAL SAMPLE SUBMITIAL(S)
All original sample submittals have been returned with the data package.
SAMPLE TEMPERATURE COMPLIANCE: 4°C (±2°C)
Report Date: 09/09/20
CASE NARRATIVE
Temperature of samples received may not be considered properly preserved by accepted standards. Samples that are hand
delivered immediately after collection shall be considered acceptable if there is evidence that the chilling process has begun.
GROSS ALPHA ANALYSIS
Method 900.0 for gross alpha and gross beta is intended as a drinking water method for low TDS waters. Data provided by
this method for non potable waters should be viewed as inconsistent.
RADON IN AIR ANALYSIS
The desired exposure time is 48 hours (2 days). The time delay in returning the canister to the laboratory for processing
should be as short as possible to avoid excessive decay. Maximum recommended delay between end of exposure to
beginning of counting should not exceed 8 days.
SOIUSOLID SAMPLES
All samples reported on an as received basis unless otherwise indicated.
ATRAZINE, SIMAZINE AND PCB ANALYSIS
Data for PCBs, Atrazine and Simazine are reported from EPA 525.2. PCB data reported by ELI reflects the results for seven
individual Aroclors. When the results for all seven are ND (not detected), the sample meets EPA compliance criteria for
PCB monitoring.
SUBCONTRACTING ANALYSIS
Subcontracting of sample analyses to an outside laboratory may be required. If so, ENERGY LABORATORIES will utilize its
branch laboratories or qualified contract laboratories for this service. Any such laboratories will be indicated within the
Laboratory Analytical Report.
BRANCH LABORATORY LOCATIONS
eli-b -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Billings, MT
eli-g -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Gillette, WY
eli-h -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Helena, MT
ISO 17025 DISCLAIMER:
The results of this Analytical Report relate only to the items submitted for analysis.
ENERGY LABORATORIES, INC. -CASPER.WY certifies that certain method selections contained in this report meet
requirements as set forth by the above accrediting authorities. Some results requested by the client may not be covered
under these certifications. All analysis data to be submitted for regulatory enforcement should be certified in the sample
state of origin. Please verify ELi's certification coverage by visiting www.energylab.com
ELI appreciates the opportunity to provide you with this analytical service. For additional information and services visit our
web page www.energylab.com.
All "J" qualified analyte concentrations are below the laboratory minimum recommended Reporting Limit (RL) and above the
calculated method detection limit (MDL). Inorganic analytes reported with "J" qualifiers should be verified against the
corresponding method blank and continuing calibration blanks. Inorganic "J" quantitations near the MDL may be suspect
due to possible method background levels, sample matrix effects, and/or daily variability in instrument signal-to-noise levels.
Page 2 of 54
.............. LINKS ••••r-«••••
,
r
Review :yo11r project
results through 1
Totd ,Access
Have a Question 7
~
k
The
Ex ert
l Visit us at:
www.eurofinsus.com/Env
.;~ eu rofi ns Environment Testing
America
ANALYTICAL REPORT
Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver
4955 Yarrow Street
Arvada, CO 80002
Tel: [phone]
Laboratory Job ID: 280-139789-1
Client Project/Site: 11(e) Byproduct Material
For:
Energy Laboratories, Inc.
400 W Boxelder Rd
Gillette, Wyoming 82718
Attn: Ms. Alyson Degnan p.-4-/-.
Authorized for release by:
9/4/2020 2:18:24 PM
Dylan Bieniulis, Project Manager I
[phone]
[e-mail]
The test results in this report meet a/12003 NELAC, 2009 TN/, end 2016 TN/ requirements for
accredited parameters, exceptions are noted in this report. This report may not be reproduced
except in full, and with written approval from the laboratory. For questions please contact the
Project Manager at the e-mail address or telephone number listed on this page.
This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signature is
intended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traciitionally handwritten signature.
Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory.
Page 17 of 54
I
Client: Energy Laboratories, Inc.
ProjecUSite: 11(e) Byproduct Material
Table of Contents
Laboratory Job ID: 280-139789-1
Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Detection Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Client Sample Results...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
QC Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
QC Association . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 o
Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Certification Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Receipt Checklists . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Page 2 of 16
Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver
Page~O
I
I
Client: Energy Laboratories, Inc.
Project/Site: 11 ( e) Byproduct Material
Definitions/Glossary
Job ID: 280-139789-1 I
Qualifiers
Metals
Qualifier
J
Glossary_
Abbreviation
C
%R
CFL
CFU
CNF
DER
Dil Fae
DL
DL, RA, RE, IN
DLC
EDL
LOD
LOQ
MCL
MDA
MDC
MDL
ML
MPN
MQL
NC
ND
NEG
POS
PQL
PRES
QC
RER
RL
RPD
TEF
TEQ
TNTC
Qualifier Description
Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.
These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report. ---'--------'----------------------Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis
Percent Recovery
Contains Free Liquid
Colony Forming Unit
Contains No Free Liquid
Duplicate Error Ratio (normalized absolute difference)
Dilution Factor
Detection Limit (DoD/DOE)
Indicates a Dilution, Re-analysis, Re-extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample
Decision Level Concentration (Radiochemistry)
Estimated Detection Limit (Dioxin)
Limit of Detection (DoD/DOE)
Limit of Quantitation (DoD/DOE)
EPA recommended "Maximum Contaminant Level"
Minimum Detectable Activity (Radiochemistry)
Minimum Detectable Concentration (Radiochemistry)
Method Detection Limit
Minimum Level (Dioxin)
Most Probable Number
Method Quantitation Limit
Not Calculated
Not Detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown)
Negative / Absent
Positive / Present
Practical Quantitation Limit
Presumptive
Quality Control
Relative Error Ratio (Radiochemistry)
Reporting Limit or Requested Limit (Radiochemistry)
Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points
Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin)
Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin)
Too Numerous To Count
Page 3 of 16
Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver
Page 199/"412020
I
Client: Energy Laboratories, Inc.
Project/Site: 11(e) Byproduct Material
Job ID: 280-139789-1
Case Narrative
Laboratory: Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver
Narrative
CASE NARRATIVE
Client: Energy Laboratories, Inc.
Project: 11(e) Byproduct Material
Report Number: 280-139789-1
Job ID: 280-139789-1
With the exceptions noted as flags or footnotes, standard analytical protocols were followed in the analysis of the samples and no
problems were encountered or anomalies observed. In addition all laboratory quality control samples were within established control
limits, with any exceptions noted below. Each sample was analyzed to achieve the lowest possible reporting limit within the constraints of
the method. In some cases, due to interference or analytes present at high concentrations, samples were diluted. For diluted samples,
the reporting limits are adjusted relative to the dilution required.
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results.
All holding times were met and proper preservation noted for the methods performed on these samples, unless otherwise detailed in the
individual sections below.
RECEIPT
The samples were received on 08/25/2020; the samples arrived in good condition and properly preserved The temperature of the coolers
at receipt was 27.0 C.
Each 250ml plastic bottle of nitric acid preserved volume for the following samples was only approximately 100ml full. Sufficient sample
volume was received to perform the requested analysis and no corrective action was needed: C20080962-001 D (280-139789-1),
C20080962-002D (280-139789-2), C20080962-003D (280-139789-3), C20080962-004D (280-139789-4), C20080962-005D
(280-139789-5), C20080962-006D (280-139789-6) and C20080962-007D (280-139789-7).
DISSOLVED MERCURY (CVAA)
Samples C20080962-001D (280-139789-1), C20080962-002D (280-139789-2), C20080962-003D (280-139789-3), C20080962-004D
(280-139789-4), C20080962-005D (280-139789-5), C20080962-006D (280-139789-6) and C20080962-007D (280-139789-7) were
analyzed for dissolved mercury (CVAA) in accordance with EPA Method 245.1 . The samples were prepared and analyzed on 09/03/2020.
A deviation from the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) occurred. Details are as follows: Insufficient sample remained for a full
preparation of C20080962-001D (280-139789-1 ), (280-139789-A-1 MS) and (280-139789-A-1 MSD) for method 245.1 (Hg). The
remaining volume 6ml was poured, diluted to 30ml starting volume with 1% nitric acid, and will be prepared as normal.
No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page.
Page 4 of 16
Eurofins TestAmerica,,. Denver
Page 20 ~14'2020
I
Detection Summary
Client: Energy Laboratories, Inc. Job ID: 280-139789-1
Project/Site: 11(e) Byproduct Material
Client Sample ID: C20080962-001 D Lab Sample ID: 2~0-139789-1
Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fae D Method Prep Type
Mercury --0.14 ug/L ---Dissolved 14 1.0 1 245.1
Client Sample ID: C20080962-002D Lab Sample I_!): 280-139789-2 I
Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fae D Method Prep Type
--0.058 --------Dissolved Mercury J 0.20 0.027 ug/L 1 245.1
Client Sample ID: C20080962-003D Lab Sample ID: 280-13978~-3
Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fae D Method Prep Type -----Mercury 3.4 0.20 0.027 ug/L 1 245.1 Dissolved
Client Sample ID: C20080962-004D Lab Sample I~: 280-139789-4
Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Oil Fae D Method Prep Type --------Mercury 0.20 0.20 0.027 ug/L 1 245.1 Dissolved
Client Sample ID: C20080962-005D Lab Sample ID: 280-139789-5 --------------------
Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fae D Method Prep Type ---Mercury 0.40 0.20 0.027 ug/L 1 245.1 Dissolved
Client Sample ID: C20080962-006D Lab Sample ID: 280-139789-6
Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fae D Method Prep Type --------Mercury 0.10 J 0.20 0.027 ug/L 1 245.1 Dissolved
--Clien!~amp le ID: C20080962-007D Lab Sample ID: 280-139789-7
Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fae D Method Prep Type ---Mercury 3.4 0.20 0.027 ug/L 1 245.1 Dissolved
This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.
Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver
Page 5 of 16 Page 21 9/4i.'!2020
Client: Energy Laboratories, Inc.
Project/Site: 11 ( e) Byproduct Material
Method
245.1
245.1
Method Description
Mercury -Dissolved
Preparation, Mercury
Protocol References:
EPA= US Environmental Protection Agency
Laboratory References:
Method Summary
TAL DEN= Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver, 4955 Yarrow Street, Arvada, CO 80002, TEL [phone]
Page 6 of 16
Job ID: 280-139789-1
Protocol
EPA ----
EPA
Laboratory
TALDEN --
TALDEN
Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver
Page 22 9/..W020
I
Client: Energy Laboratories, Inc.
Project/Site: 11 (e) Byproduct Material
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID
280-139789-1 C20080962-001 D
280-139789-2 C20080962-0020
280-139789-3 C20080962-0030
280-139789-4 C20080962-004D
280-139789-5 C20080962-0050
280-139789-6 C20080962-0060
280-139789-7 C20080962-0070
Sample Summary
Job ID: 280-139789-1
-~ -~-
Matrix
---Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Page 7 of 16
Collected
08/19/20 08:30
08/19/20 08:50
08/19/20 09:15
08/19/20 09:35
08/19/20 10:00
08/19/20 09:45
08/19/20 09:15
---
Received Asset ID
08/25/20 09:45
08/25/20 09:45
08/25/20 09:45
08/25/20 09:45
08/25/20 09:45
08/25/20 09:45
08/25/20 09:45
Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver
Page 239/"42020
I
Client Sample Results
Client: Energy Laboratories, Inc. Job ID: 280-139789-1
ProjecUSite: 11(e) Byproduct Material
---Meth~d: 245.1 -Mercury -Dissolved -Dissolve«!_
Client Sample ID: C20080962-001 D Lab Sample ID: 280-139789-1
Date Collected: 08/19/20 08:30 Matrix: Water
Date Received: 08/25/20 09:45
Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fae
Mercury 14 1.0 0.14 ug/L 09/03/20 12:20 09/03/20 15:51 1
Client Sample ID: C20080962-002D Lab Sample ID: 280-139789-2
Date Collected: 08/19/20 08:50 Matrix: Water
Date Received: 08/25/20 09:45
Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fae I Mercury ---0.058 J 0.20 0.027 ug/L 09/03/20 12:20 09/03/20 15:58 1
Client Sample ID: C20080962-003D Lab Sample ID: 280-139789-3
Date Collected: 08/19/20 09:15 Matrix: Water
Date Received: 08/25/20 09:45
Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fae
Mercury ug/L----3.4 0.20 0.027 09/03/20 12:20 09/03/20 16:00 1
Client Sample ID: C20080962-004D Lab Sample ID: 280-139789-4
Date Collected: 08/19/20 09:35 Matrix: Water
Date Received: 08/25/20 09:45
Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fae
Mercury 0.20 0.20 0.027 ug/L 09/03/20 12:20 09103120 16:02 1
Client Sample ID: C20080962-005D Lab Sample ID: 280-139789-5
Date Collected: 08/19/20 10:00 Matrix: Water
Date Received: 08/25/20 09:45
Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fae
Mercury 0.40 0.20 0.027 ug/L 09103/20 12:20 09/03/20 16:05 1
Client Sample ID: C20080962-006D Lab Sample ID: 280-139789-6
Date Collected: 08/19/20 09:45 Matrix: Water
Date Received: 08/25/20 09:45
Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fae
Mercury 0.10 J 0.20 0.027 ug/L 09/03/20 12:20 09/03/20 16:07 1
Client Sample ID: C20080962-007D Lab Sample ID: 280-139789-7
Date Collected: 08/19/20 09:15 Matrix: Water
Date Received: 08/25/20 09:45
1 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fae
Mercury -----~ 09/03/20 16:14 3.4 0.027 ug/L 09/03/20 12:20 1
Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver
Page 8 of 16 Page 249/4ile020
QC Sample Results
Client: Energy Laboratories, Inc.
ProjecUSite: 11 (e) Byproduct Material
Method: 245.1 -Mercury -Dissolved
Lab Sample ID: MB 280-507863/1-A
Matrix: Water
Analysis Batch: 507983
MB MB
Analyte
Mercury __ _
Result Qualifier
ND
Lab Sample ID: LCS 280-507863/2-A
Matrix: Water
Analysis Batch: 507983
Analyte
Mercury
Lab Sample ID: 280-139789-1 MS
Matrix: Water
Analysis Batch: 507983
Analyte
Mercury
Sample
Result
14
Lab Sample ID: 280-139789-1 MSD
Matrix: Water
Analysis Batch: 507983
Analyte
Mercury
Sample
Result
14
Sample
Qualifier
Sample
Qualifier
RL MDL Unit -----------0.20 0.027 ug/L
Job ID: 280-139789-1
Client Sample ID: Method Blank
Prep Type: Total/NA
Prep Batch: 507863
D Prepared Analyzed Oil Fae ---09/03/20 12:20 09/03/20 15:47 1
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample
Prep Type: Total/NA
Prep Batch: 507863
Spike LCS LCS
Added Result Qualifier Unit ----5.00 5.06 ug/L
Spike MS MS
Added Result Qualifier Unit
25.0 38.7 ug/L
Spike MSO MSO
Added Result Qualifier Unit ---25.0 39.1 ug/L
Page 9 of 16
D %Rec
101
%Rec.
Limits __ ___ I
90-110
Client Sample ID: C20080962-001 D
Prep Type: Dissolved
Prep Batch: 507863
%Rec.
0 %Rec Limits -----98 80-120
Client Sample ID: C20080962-001 D
Prep Type: Dissolved
Prep Batch: 507863
%Rec. RPO
0 %Rec Limits RPO Limit -------99 80-120 1 10
Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver
Page 25 9/4JQ020
QC Association Summary
Client: Energy Laboratories, Inc. Job ID: 280-139789-1
ProjecUSite: 11(e) Byproduct Material
Metals
Prep Batch: 507863
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
280-139789-1 C20080962-001 D Dissolved Water 245.1
280-139789-2 C20080962-002D Dissolved Water 245.1
280-139789-3 C20080962-003D Dissolved Water 245.1
280-139789-4 C20080962-004D Dissolved Water 245.1
280-139789-5 C20080962-005D Dissolved Water 245.1
280-139789-6 C20080962-006D Dissolved Water 245.1
280-139789-7 C20080962-007D Dissolved Water 245.1
MB 280-507863/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Water 245.1
LCS 280-507863/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 245.1
280-139789-1 MS C20080962-001D Dissolved Water 245.1
280-139789-1 MSD C20080962-001 D Dissolved Water 245.1
Analysis Batch: 507983 m
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
280-139789-1 C20080962-001 D Dissolved Water 245.-1--507863
280-139789-2 C20080962-002D Dissolved Water 245.1 507863
280-139789-3 C20080962-003D Dissolved Water 245.1 507863
280-139789-4 C20080962-004D Dissolved Water 245.1 507863
280-139789-5 C20080962-005D Dissolved Water 245.1 507863
280-139789-6 C20080962-006D Dissolved Water 245.1 507863
280-139789-7 C20080962-007D Dissolved Water 245.1 507863
MB 280-507863/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Water 245.1 507863
LCS 280-507863/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 245.1 507863
280-139789-1 MS C20080962-001 D Dissolved Water 245.1 507863
280-139789-1 MSD C20080962-001 D Dissolved Water 245.1 507863
Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver
Page 10 of 16 Page 26 9/4,12020
Lab Chronicle
Client: Energy Laboratories, Inc. Job ID: 280-139789-1
ProjecUSite: 11 (e) Byproduct Material
-----Client Sample ID: C20080962-001 D Lab Sample ID: 280-139789-1
Date Collected: 08/19/20 08:30 Matrix: Water
Date Received: 08/25/20 09:45
Batch Batch Dil Initial Final Batch Prepared
Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab
Dissolved Prep 245.1 6mL 50ml 507863 09/03/20 12:20 AL TALDEN
Dissolved Analysis 245.1 507983 09/03/20 15:51 AL TAL DEN -------Client Sample ID: C20080962-002D Lab Sample ID: 280-139789-2
Date Collected: 08/19/20 08:50 Matrix: Water
Date Received: 08/25/20 09:45 ---
Batch Batch Dil Initial Final Batch Prepared
Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab
Dissolved Prep 245.1 30 ml 50 ml 507863 09/03/20 12:20 AL TAL DEN
Dissolved Analysis 245.1 507983 09/03/20 15:58 AL TAL DEN
Client Sample ID: C20080962-003D Lab Sample ID: 280-139789-3 m Date Collected: 08/19/20 09:15 Matrix: Water
Date Received: 08/25/20 09:45
Batch Batch Dil Initial Final Batch Prepared
Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab ----Dissolved Prep 245.1 30 ml 50 ml 507863 09/03/20 12:20 AL TAL DEN
Dissolved Analysis 245.1 507983 09/03/20 16:00 AL TAL DEN
---Client Sample ID: C20080962-004D Lab Sample ID: 280-139789-4
Date Collected: 08/19/20 09:35 Matrix: Water
Date Received: 08/25/20 09:45
Batch Batch Dil Initial Final Batch Prepared
Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab --------Dissolved Prep 245.1 30 ml 50 ml 507863 09/03/20 12:20 AL TAL DEN
Dissolved Analysis 245.1 507983 09/03/20 16:02 AL TAL DEN
--Client Sample ID: C20080962-005D Lab Sample ID: 280-139789-5
Date Collected: 08/19/20 10:00 Matrix: Water
Date Received: 08/25/20 09:45 ---
Batch Batch Dil Initial Final Batch Prepared
Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab
Dissolved Prep 245.1 30 ml 50 ml 507863 09/03/20 12:20 AL TAL DEN
Dissolved Analysis 245.1 507983 09/03/20 16:05 AL TALDEN
Client Sample ID: C20080962-006D Lab Sample ID: 280-139789-6
Date Collected: 08/19/20 09:45 Matrix: Water
Date Received: 08/25/20 09:45
Batch Batch Dil Initial Final Batch Prepared
Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab -----Dissolved Prep 245.1 30ml 50 ml 507863 09/03/20 12:20 AL TAL DEN
Dissolved Analysis 245.1 507983 09/03/20 16:07 AL TAL DEN
Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver
Page 11 of 16 Page 27 9/4.le020
Client: Energy Laboratories, Inc.
ProjecUSite: 11(e) Byproduct Material
Client Sample ID: C20080962-007D
Date Collected: 08/19/20 09:15
Date Received: 08/25/20 09:45
Prep Type
Dissolved
Dissolved
Batch
Type
Prep
Analysis
Laboratory References:
Batch
Method
245.1
245.1
Lab Chronicle
Dil
Run Factor
Initial
Amount
30mL
Final
Amount
50mL
TAL DEN= Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver, 4955 Yarrow Street, Arvada, CO 80002, TEL [phone]
Page 12 of 16
Job ID: 280-139789-1
Lab Sample ID: 280-139789-7
Matrix: Water
Batch
Number
507863
Prepared
or Analyzed Analyst ---09/03/20 12:20 AL
Lab
507983 09/03/20 16:14 AL
TALDEN
TAL DEN
Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver
Page 28 9/""2020
Ace red itation/Ce rtification Summary
Client: Energy Laboratories, Inc.
ProjecUSite: 11 (e) Byproduct Material
Laboratory: Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver
Job ID: 280-139789-1
All accreditations/certifications held by this laboratory are listed. Not all accreditations/certifications are applicable to this report.
Authority Program Identification Number Expiration Date
A2LA Dept. of Defense ELAP 2907.01 10-31-21
, A2LA ISO/IEC 17025 2907.01 10-31-21
Alabama State Program 40730 09-30-12 •
Alaska (UST) State 18-001 02-08-21
Alaska (UST) State 18-001 02-08-21
Arizona State AZ0713 12-20-20
Arkansas DEQ State 19-047-0 06-01-21
California State 2513 01-08-21
Connecticut State PH-0686 09-30-20
Florida NELAP E87667-57 07-01-21
Georgia State 4025-011 01-09-21
Illinois NELAP 2000172019-1 04-30-21
Iowa State IA#370 12-01-20
Kansas NELAP E-10166 04-30-21
Louisiana NELAP 30785 06-30-14 *
Louisiana NELAP 30785 06-30-21
Maine State 2019011 [phone]
Minnesota NELAP 1788752 12-31-20
New Hampshire NELAP 205319 04-29-21
New Jersey NELAP 190002 06-30-21
New York NELAP 59923 04-01-21
North Carolina (WW/SW) State 358 12-31-20
North Dakota State R-034 01-08-21
Oklahoma State 2018-006 09-01-21
Oregon NELAP 4025-011 01-08-21
Pennsylvania NELAP 013 07-31-21
South Carolina State 72002001 01-08-21
Texas NELAP T104704183-19-17 09-30-20
US Fish & Wildlife US Federal Programs 058448 08-01-21
USDA US Federal Programs P330-18-00099 03-26-21
Utah NELAP QUAN5 06-30-13 •
Utah NELAP C0000262019-11 07-31-21
Virginia NELAP 10490 06-14-21
Washington State C583-19 08-03-21
West Virginia DEP State 354 11-30-20
Wyoming (UST) A2LA 2907.01 10-31-21
* Accreditation/Certification renewal pending -accreditation/certification considered valid.
Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver
Page 13 of 16 Page 299/4"J2020
"'U Ql (0
CD .....
~
0 -.....
0)
"'tl II> (C
(1)
w 0
I 0 N 0
· '""Enet2)' Laboratories, Inc.
2393 Salt Crailc Hwy
Casper, WY 82601-9601
307.llS.OS 15
SUbcullladlr.
Test America
4955 Yam:NI St
Arvada. CO 80002
TEL: [phone]
FAX:
Acct#: 3037360100
SUbcontraclor's Cllllnt
-I C20080962-0010
I C20080962-002D
I C200&0962--003D
C20080962-004D
C20080962--005D
C20080962-006D
C20080962-0070
Comments:
QC Level: I
STD
Aaueous
Aaueous
Aaueous
Aoueous
.AQueous
Aoueous
Aouecus
111[11111111111111
C20080962
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD Page 1 of 1
21-Aug-20
PO: __ Earliest HT Expires: Wed, 9/16/2020 0830
Test Codes: CVAA-HG-245-W-D, PRP-HG-1 Earliest Due Date:
24S. l # Bus. Days Uatil Due:
9/28/2020
25
R8Questad TN111
0 "'O -
~ :u "'O
:i: :r C) f ~ ... c.n ~ :..
0
1---~ ~ 1--
...!... J... ....._ LJ I._ ~ ....._ 1--....._ 1--....._ ....._
....._ '--
1--....._ 1--1--
....._ ....._ '--1.-....._ ....._ ,___ ...._ ,__ 08/1912008:30A l1 -250ML-P-F-HN03
08/19/20 08:50 A f 1 -2.'iOML-P..F-HN0'.3
MJ1Qi,n M-1!'i A 11 • ,!'il'IMI •. P.~.J.INO'l.
l\ll/1Q1'n na•'l.'i .a I 1 _ ,,;nu1 JU:'.1-!Nn'l.
nA11onn 1n•M A J1 . ,.o;nu1 .PS.J.INn'l.
I--------·--··,. --··-·. ····--I [TI [I) DD DD DD DD DD DD DD
,--·-·----..... ,. -···-··· .. ·--,ITJITJDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
I--·-----·---·····---.. -······--I OJ OJ DD DD DD DD DD DD DD , --·---·-·----,···--···-·--· .. ·--, rum o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
08/19n0 09·'5 A J1 -250Ml-P-F-HNO'.l • ---------·-·· 1· ---··-·. ····--I IT1 IT1 DD DODD DD DD DD DD
D8119/20 09:15 A 11 · ?!iOMI-P.i:.HNO'l. _ -·----··-·· ,--------..... __ • DJ moo o o o o o o o o o o o o
280-139789 Chain of Custody ------
-J ~~
""hq•mhodby, ~ ~0
~·t,me Date/Time
<!J.~t:j?-;:, OC\'-\5 ~~ \~33 Received by: ;'l1¢f> e:J).Dfu
Relinquished by: Received by:
Custody Seal Intact Temp Blank On Ice
Shipped By: y N y N Receipt Temp: ·c y N y ®
1!!11
~RE.P BATCH REPORT Page 1 of 1
iJ !ll (0
CD ......
01
0 -......
0)
"O Ql co CD
(;) _.
I 0 I\.)
0
Prep Batch 59035
Prep Code: PRP-FIL T-MET
Prep Temp NA ec
Technician: Sheri R. Mathews
Batch Units: ML
Prep Start Date: 8/21/2020 15:07:39
Prep End Date: 8/21/2020 15:20:00 -----------~------=·----~-'--'°' =----------------=--==c
Sample ID Matrix pH
MB-59035 7
Initial
SampAmt
100
Sol Sol
Added Recovered
0 -----------------
C200S0962-001D Aqueous <2 100 o o
==== -s-=~--s,=-~a~,.------. ·
Final
Vol (ml)
100
100
Factor Balance
-The sample fraction s~milted for Dis~olved Metals Analysis was received in the laboratory unfiltered. -------·----
C20080962-002D Aqueous <2 100 O O 100
Prep Prep
Start Date End Date
8121/2020 8/21/2020 -·----~-----~··· -
8/21/2020 8/21/2020
--
8121/2020 8121/2020
__ _ -The sample fraction submitted for Dissolved _Metals Analysis was received in the laboratory unfiltered _ -------------------------C20080962--003D Aqueous <2 100 0 o 100
-The sample fraction submitted for Dissolved Metals Analysis was received in the laboratory unfiltered. ___ _
C20080962-004D Aqueous <2 100 0 O
_____ -_T_h_e_sa_m __ p_le_ fraction submitted _for Dissolved Metals Analysis was received in the laboratory unfiltered.
C20080962-00SD Aqueous <2 100 0 0
-The sample_fraction submitted for Dissolved _Metals Analysis_was received in the laboratory unfiltered.
C20080962-006D Aqueous <2 100 O o
__________ -The sample fraction submitted for Dissolved Metals Analysis was received in the laboratory unfiltered.
C20080962-007D Aqueous <2 100 0 0
100
100 1
100
100
____ • The sample fraction submitted for Dissolved Met!I~ :6-'!~si~~-r':~ived in_!he l~c>_~atory unfiltered ___ _
ExoDate I
8/21/2020 8/2112020
--
8/21/2020 8/2112020
----
8/21/2020 8/21/2020
----
8/21/2020 8/21/2020
----
8/21/2020 8/21/2020
------
Number Reaaent Name T l
10719 pH Paper-204518 2/15/2021 I ISRM AO PRP-Flt.jSRM AQ PRP-FILT-MET DOC 0421jD0C 11 I 3121/2021 _J
Spk ID 1 Splke Name SampType_ i AmlAdd
11191 Nilric Acid 50% -J270-19 1om2021
1119E FllpMate 50-90530751-9295-AM 10129/202! I
l!!!I
Login Sample Receipt Checklist
Client: Energy Laboratories, Inc.
Login Number: 139789
List Number: 1
Creator: Bentley, Beau J
Question Answer
Radioactivity wasn't checked or is </= background as measured by a survey True
meter.
The cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact. True
Sample custody seals, if present, are intact. True
The cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or True
tampered with.
Samples were received on ice.
Cooler Temperature is acceptable.
False
True
Cooler Temperature is recorded. True
COC is present. True
COC is filled out in ink and legible. True
COC is filled out with all pertinent information. True
Is the Field Sampler's name present on COC? True
There are no discrepancies between the containers received and the COC. True
Samples are received within Holding Time (excluding tests with immediate True
HTs)
Sample containers have legible labels. True
Containers are not broken or leaking. True
Sample collection date/times are provided. True
Appropriate sample containers are used.
Sample bottles are completely filled.
True
False
Sample Preservation Verified. NIA
There is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested True
MS/MSDs
Containers requiring zero headspace have no headspace or bubble is NIA
<6mm (1/4").
Multiphasic samples are not present. True
Samples do not require splitting or compositing. True
Residual Chlorine Checked. NIA
Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver
Page 16 of 16
Job Number: 280-139789-1
List Source: Eurofins TestAmerica, Denver
Comment
Thermal preservation not required.
Limited volume received.
Page 32 914Jf2020
EN:RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data.
www.energylab.com
QA/QC Summary Report
Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515
Gillette, WY 888.688.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Work Order: C20080962 Report Date: 08/28/20
Analyte
Method: A2320 B
Lab ID: rev
pH
Method: A2320 B
Lab ID: MBLK
Alkalinity, Total as CaC03
Lab ID: LCS
Alkalinity, Total as CaC03
Lab ID: C20080962-005ADUP
Alkalinity, Total as CaC03
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte Reporting Limit
Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPDLimit
Initial Calibration Verification Standard
6.90 s.u. 0.010
Method Blank
ND mg/L 5
Laboratory Control Sample
263 mg/L 5.0
Sample Duplicate
ND mg/L 5.0
101 98
Analytical Run: MANTECH_2008248
08/24/20 15:32
102
Run: MANTECH_2008248
Batch: R261826
08/24/20 19: 15
Run: MANTECH_200824B 08/24/20 19:22
105 90 110
Run: MANTECH_2008248 08/24/20 20:32
10
ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL)
Page 33 of 54
EN:RGY
I
Trust our People. Trust our Data.
www.energylab.com
QA/QC Summary Report
Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WV 888.235.0515
Gillette, WV 866.686. 7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Work Order: C20080962 Report Date: 08/28/20
Analyte
Method: A2510 B
Lab ID: SC 100
Conductivity@ 25 C
Lab ID: SC 5000
Conductivity @ 25 C
Lab ID: SC 20000
Conductivity @ 25 C
Method: A2510 B
Lab ID: SC 50000
Conductivity @ 25 C
Lab ID: MBLK
Conductivity @ 25 C
Lab ID: C20080962-003ADUP
Conductivity @ 25 C
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte Reporting Limit
Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD RPDLimlt Qual
Initial Calibration Verification Standard
100 umhos/cm 5.0
Initial Calibration Verification Standard
5000 umhos/cm 5.0
Initial Calibration Verification Standard
20200 umhos/cm 5.0
Initial Calibration Verification Standard
49200 umhos/cm 5.0
Method Blank
0.7 umhos/cm
Sample Duplicate
84200 umhos/cm 5.0
Analytical Run: PHSC_ 101-C_200821A
100 90 110
100 90 110
101 90 110
Run: PHSC_ 101-C_200821A
98 90 110
Run: PHSC_101-C_200821A
Run: PHSC_ 101-C_200821A
0.2
08/21/20 11 :02
08/21/20 11 :06
08/21/20 11 :09
Batch: R261749
08/21/20 11: 12
08/21/20 14:08
08/21/20 14:15
10
ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL)
Page .34 of 54
EN:RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data.
www.energylab.com
Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515
Gillette, WY 868.688.7175 • Helena, MT 877 .472.0711
QA/QC Summary Report
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Work Order: C20080962 Report Date: 08/28/20
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD RPDLimit Qual
Method: A2540 C Batch: TDS2008218
Lab ID: MB-25_200821 B Method Blank Run: BAL-111_2008218 08/21/20 12:14
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS@ 180 C ND mg/L 6
Lab ID: LCS-26_200821 B Laboratory Control Sample Run: BAL-111_200821B 08/21 /20 12:14
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS@ 180 C 998 mg/L 10 100 90 110
Lab ID: C20080962-001A DUP Sample Duplicate Run: BAL-111 _200821B 08/21/20 12:15
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS@ 180 C 405000 mg/L 2000 0.3 5
Method: A2540 C Batch: TDS200824A
Lab ID: MB-1_200824A Method Blank Run: BAL-111_200824A 08/24/20 14:31
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS@ 180 C ND mg/L 6
Lab ID: LCS-2_200824A Laboratory Control Sample Run: BAL-111_200824A 08/24/20 14:31
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS@ 180 C 999 mg/L 10 100 90 110
Lab ID: C20080914-006A DUP Sample Duplicate Run: BAL-111 200824A 08/24/20 14:32 -
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS@ 180 C 2770 mg/L 20 0.2 5
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte Reporting Limit ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL)
Page 35 of 54
E"-ERGY Trust our People. Trust our Data.
www.energylab.com
Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515
Gillette, WY 886.686.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711
QA/QC Summary Report
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Work Order: C20080962 Report Date: 08/28/20
Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPDLimlt Qual
Method: A4500-F C Batch: R261801
Lab ID: LCS Laboratory Control Sample Run: MANTECH_200824A 08/24/20 10:53
Fluoride 2.11 mg/L 0.10 106 90 110
Lab ID: MBLK Method Blank Run: MANTECH_200824A 08/24/20 11 :00
Fluoride ND mg/L 0.02
Lab ID: C20080889-001 AMS Sample Matrix Spike Run: MANTECH_200824A 08/24/2011 :18
Fluoride 2.37 mg/L 0.10 112 90 110 s
Lab ID: C200S0941-001ADUP Sample Duplicate Run: MANTECH_200824A 08/24/20 11 :24
Fluoride 0.120 mg/L 0.10 8.0 10
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte Reporting Limit ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL)
S -Spike recovery outside of advisory limits
Page 36 of 54
E~RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data.
www.energylab.com
Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515
Gillette, WY 868.886.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711
QA/QC Summary Report
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Work Order: C20080962 Report Date: 08/28/20
Analyte
Method:
Lab ID:
pH
A4500-H B
6.86
pH Measurement Temp
Method:
Lab ID:
pH
A4500-H B
C20080962-003ADUP
pH Measurement Temp
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte Reporting Limit
Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPDLimit Qual
2 Initial Calibration Verification Standard
Analytical Run: PHSC_101-C_200821A
08/21 /20 10:59
102 6.89 s.u.
21.1 ·c
2 Sample Duplicate
2.30 s.u.
15.7 ·c
0.010 100
0.010
98
0 0
Run: PHSC_101-C_200821A
ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL)
2.6
Batch: R261749
08/21/20 14:15
1.5
Page 37 of 54
EI\ERGY Trust our People. Trust our Data.
www.energylab.com
Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515
Gillette, WY 866.686.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711
QA/QC Summary Report
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Work Order: C20080962 Report Date: 08/28/20 -----------
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPDLimit Qual
Method: E300.0 Analytical Run: IC3-C_200824A
Lab ID: ICV 2 Initial Calibration Verification Standard 08/24/20 13:26
Chloride 10.1 mg/L 1.0 101 90 110
Sulfate 42.5 mg/L 1.0 106 90 110
Method: E300.0 Batch: R261829
Lab ID: ICB 2 Method Blank Run: IC3-C_200824A 08/24/20 13:45
Chloride ND mg/L 0.06
Sulfate ND mg/L 0.2
Lab ID: LFB 2 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: IC3-C_200824A 08/24/20 14:04
Chloride 10.3 mg/L 1.0 103 90 110
Sulfate 43.5 mg/L 1.0 109 90 110
Lab ID: C20080965-001 AMS 2 Sample Matrix Spike Run: IC3-C_200824A 08/24/20 19:30
Chloride 12.8 mg/L 1.0 107 80 120
Sulfate 80.6 mg/L 1.0 112 80 120
Lab ID: C20080965-001 AMSD 2 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: IC3-C_200824A 08/24/20 19:49
Chloride 12.9 mg/L 1.0 108 80 120 0.2 20
Sulfate 80.8 mg/L 1.0 112 80 120 0.3 20
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte Reporting Limit ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL)
Page 38 of 54
E~RGY ,, Trust our People. Trust our Data.
www.energylab.com
QA/QC Summary Report
Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515
Gillette, WY 888.886.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Work Order: C20080962 Report Date: 08/28/20
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD RPDLimit Qual
Method: E350.1
Lab ID: ICV Initial Calibration Verification Standard
Analytical Run: FIA201-C_200826A
08/26/20 09:53
110 Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 1.04 mg/L 0.050 104 90
Method: E350.1 Batch: R261895
Lab ID: MBLK Method Blank Run: FIA201-C_200826A 08/26/20 09:52
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N ND mg/L 0.02
Lab ID: LFB Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: FIA201-C_200826A 08/26/20 09:54
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 1.03 mg/L 0.050 104 90 110
Lab ID: C20080975-001 CMS Sample Matrix Spike Run: FIA201-C_200826A 08/26/20 10:05
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 0.958 mg/L 0.050 84 90 110 s
Lab ID: C20080975-001 CMSD Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: FIA201-C_200826A 08/26/20 10:06
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 0.930 mg/L 0.050 82 90 110 3.0 10 s
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte Reporting Limit ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL)
S -Spike recovery outside of advisory limits
Page 39 of 54
EN:RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data.
www.energylab.com
Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515
Gillette, WY 866.686.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711
QA/QC Summary Report
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Work Order: C20080962 Report Date: 08/28/20
Analyte
Method: E353.2
Lab ID: rev
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Method: E353.2
Lab ID: MBLK
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Lab ID: LFB
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Lab ID: C20080962-006CMS
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Lab ID: C20080962-006CM5D
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte Reporting Limit
Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD RPDLimlt
Initial Calibration Verification Standard
1.02 mg/L 0.010
Method Blank
ND mg/L 0.008
Laboratory Fortified Blank
1.03 mg/L 0.010
Sample Matrix Spike
52.3 mg/L 0.25
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
51.5 mg/L 0.25
102
104
51
48
90
Analytical Run: FIA201-C_2008248
08/24/20 14:44
110
Batch: R261816
Run: FIA201-C_200824B 08/24/20 14:45
Run: FIA201-C_2008248 08/24/20 14:46
90 110
Run: FIA201-C_2008248 08/24/20 16:30
90 110 s
Run: FIA201-C_200824B 08/24/20 16:31
90 110 1.5 10 s
ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL)
S -Spike recovery outside of advisory limits
Page 40 of 54
El'\ERGY Trust our People. Trust our Data.
www.energylab.com
Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515
Gillette, WY 866.686.7175 • Helena, MT 877 .472.0711
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Work Order: C20080962 Report Date: 09/04/20 ---
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPDLimit Qual
Method: E200.7 Analytical Run: ICP4-C_200824A
Lab ID: QCS 7 Initial Calibration Verification Standard 08/24/20 13:44
Beryllium 0.399 mg/L 0.010 100 90 110
Calcium 40.1 mg/L 0.50 100 90 110
Iron 4.11 mg/L 0.10 103 90 110
Magnesium 39.6 mg/L 0.50 99 90 110
Manganese 3.90 mg/L 0.010 98 90 110
Potassium 40.0 mg/L 0.50 100 90 110
Sodium 39.6 mg/L 0.53 99 90 110
Method: E200.7 Batch: R261803
Lab ID: LFB-6300DIS200824A 7 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: ICP4-C_200824A 08/24/20 13:40
Beryllium 0.485 mg/L 0.010 97 85 115
Calcium 48.6 mg/L 0.50 97 85 115
Iron 5.00 mg/L 0.10 100 85 115
Magnesium 48.4 mg/L 0.50 97 85 115
Manganese 4.72 mg/L 0.010 94 85 115
Potassium 49.0 mg/L 0.50 98 85 115
Sodium 48.2 mg/L 0.54 96 85 115
Lab ID: MB-59028 7 Method Blank Run: ICP4-C_200824A 08/24/20 15:29
Beryllium ND mg/L 0.0001
Calcium ND mg/L 0.3
Iron ND mg/L 0.06
Magnesium ND mg/L 0.03
Manganese ND mg/L 0.001
Potassium ND mg/L 0.2
Sodium ND mg/L 0.5
Lab ID: C20080962-0078DIL 7 Serial Dilution Run: ICP4-C_200824A 08/24/20 16:09
Beryllium 0.403 mg/L 0.32 10 N
Calcium 648 mg/L 130 10 N
Iron 3550 mg/L 30 2.6 10
Magnesium 4310 mg/L 6.2 0.4 10
Manganese 196 mg/L 0.62 1.6 10
Potassium 1590 mg/L 120 3.1 10
Sodium 16400 mg/L 260 0.9 10
Lab ID: C20080962-007BMS2 7 Sample Matrix Spike Run: ICP4-C_200824A 08/24/20 16:13
Beryllium 48.5 mg/L 0.065 96 70 130
Calcium 5410 mg/L 26 96 70 130
Iron 3750 mg/L 6.1 70 130 A
Magnesium 9000 mg/L 1.3 93 70 130
Manganese 649 mg/L 0.13 91 70 130
Potassium 6430 mg/L 26 98 70 130
Sodium 20400 mg/L 54 82 70 130
Lab ID: C20080962-007BMSD 7 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: ICP4-C_200824A 08/24/20 16:16
Beryllium 48.1 mg/L 0.065 95 70 130 1.0 20
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte Reporting Limit A -Analyte level was greater than four times the spike level -in
accordance with the method, percent recovery is not calculated
ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL) N -Analyte concentration was not sufficiently high to calculate a
Relative Percent Difference (RPO) for the serial dilution test
Page 41 of 54
EN:RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data.
www.energylab.com
Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515
Gillette, WY 868.888.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711
QA/QC Summary Report
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Analyte Count Result
Method: E200.7
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Work Order: C20080962 Report Date: 09/04/20
Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPDLimit Qual
Batch: R261803
Lab ID: C20080962-007BMSD 7 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: ICP4-C_200824A 08/24/20 16:16
Calcium 5420 mg/L
Iron 4060 mg/L
Magnesium 9370 mg/L
Manganese 662 mg/L
Potassium 6520 mg/L
Sodium 21900 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte Reporting Limit
ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL)
26 96 70 130 0.2 20
6.1 70 130 8.0 20
1.3 101 70 130 4.0 20
0.13 94 70 130 2.1 20
26 100 70 130 1.4 20
54 113 70 130 7.2 20
A -Analyte level was greater than four times the spike level -in
accordance with the method, percent recovery is not calculated
A
Page 42 of 54
Er\ERGY Trust our People. Trust our Data.
www.energylab.com
QA/QC Summary Report
Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515
Gillette, WY 866.686.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Work Order: C20080962 Report Date: 09/04/20
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD RPDLimit Qual
Method: E200.8 Analytical Run: ICPMS5-C_200824A
Lab ID: QCS 16 Initial Calibration Verification Standard 08/25/20 12:12
Arsenic 0.0488 mg/L 0.0010 98 90 110
Cadmium 0.0251 mg/L 0.0010 100 90 110
Chromium 0.0483 mg/L 0.0050 97 90 110
Cobalt 0.0510 mg/L 0.0050 102 90 110
Copper 0.0499 mg/L 0.0050 100 90 110
Iron 0.252 mg/L 0.020 101 90 110
Lead 0.0480 mg/L 0.0010 96 90 110
Molybdenum 0.0477 mg/L 0.0010 95 90 110
Nickel 0.0496 mg/L 0.0050 99 90 110
Selenium 0.0511 mg/L 0.0010 102 90 110
Silver 0.0253 mg/L 0.0010 101 90 110
Thallium 0.0525 mg/L 0.00050 105 90 110
Tin 0.0484 mg/L 0.050 97 90 110
Uranium 0.0192 mg/L 0.00030 96 90 110
Vanadium 0.0479 mg/L 0.010 96 90 110
Zinc 0.0513 mg/L 0.010 103 90 110
Method: E200.8 Batch: R261804
Lab ID: LFB 16 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: ICPMS5-C_200824A 08/24/20 13:36
Arsenic 0.0501 mg/L 0.0010 100 85 115
Cadmium 0.0492 mg/L 0.0010 98 85 115
Chromium 0.0506 mg/L 0.0050 101 85 115
Cobalt 0.0511 mg/L 0.0050 102 85 115
Copper 0.0502 mg/L 0.0050 100 85 115
Iron 5.01 mg/L 0.020 100 85 115
Lead 0.0503 mg/L 0.0010 101 85 115
Molybdenum 0.0499 mg/L 0.0010 100 85 115
Nickel 0.0504 mg/L 0.0050 101 85 115
Selenium 0.0497 mg/L 0.0010 99 85 115
Silver 0.0202 mg/L 0.0010 101 85 115
Thallium 0.0502 mg/L 0.00050 100 85 115
Tin 0.0494 mg/L 0.050 99 85 115
Uranium 0.0518 mg/L 0.00030 104 85 115
Vanadium 0.0508 mg/L 0.010 102 85 115
Zinc 0.0492 mg/L 0.010 98 85 115
Lab ID: MB-59028 16 Method Blank Run: ICPMS5-C_200824A 08/25/20 12:32
Arsenic ND mg/L 8E-05
Cadmium ND mg/L 2E-05
Chromium ND mg/L 8E-05
Cobalt ND mg/L 5E-05
Copper ND mg/L 0.0010
Iron ND mg/L 0.005
Lead ND mg/L 7E-05
Molybdenum ND mg/L 0.0001
Nickel ND mg/L 0.0003
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte Reporting Limit ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL)
Page 43 of 54
El'ERGY Trust our People. Trust our Data.
www.energylab.com
Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515
Gillette, WY 866.686. 7175 • Helena, MT 877 .472.0711
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Work Order: C20080962 Report Date: 09/04/20
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD RPDLimit Qual
Method: E200.8 Batch: R261804
Lab ID: MB-59028 16 Method Blank Run: ICPMS5-C_200824A 08/25/20 12:32
Selenium ND mg/L 0.0002
Silver ND mg/L 2E-05
Thallium 9E-05 mg/L 5E-05
Tin ND mg/L 0.0002
Uranium ND mg/L 3E-05
Vanadium ND mg/L 0.0007
Zinc ND mg/L 0.003
Lab ID: C20080962-001 BMS 16 Sample Matrix Spike Run: ICPMS5-C_200824A 08/25/20 18:49
Arsenic 636 mg/L 0.10 70 130 A
Cadmium 56.5 mg/L 0.10 93 70 130
Chromium 75.6 mg/L 0.10 95 70 130
Cobalt 103 mg/L 0.10 88 70 130
Copper 2060 mg/L 0.98 70 130 AE
Iron 19500 mg/L 4.9 81 70 130
Lead 88.3 mg/L 0.10 92 70 130
Molybdenum 289 mg/L 0.11 70 130 A
Nickel 77.4 mg/L 0.26 95 70 130
Selenium 62.0 mg/L 0.22 92 70 130
Silver 20.5 mg/L 0.041 96 70 130
Thallium 41.6 mg/L 0.10 83 70 130
Tin 51 .5 mg/L 0.25 101 70 130
Uranium 245 mg/L 0.10 90 70 130
Vanadium 2140 mg/L 1.0 70 130 AE
Zinc 410 mg/L 2.9 70 130 A
Lab ID: C20080962-001 BMSD 16 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: ICPMS5-C_200824A 08/25/20 18:55
Arsenic 631 mg/L
Cadmium 57.8 mg/L
Chromium 76.1 mg/L
Cobalt 104 mg/L
Copper 2050 mg/L
Iron 19400 mg/L
Lead 89.2 mg/L
Molybdenum 291 mg/L
Nickel 77.3 mg/L
Selenium 62.7 mg/L
Silver 21 .1 mg/L
Thallium 43.7 mg/L
Tin 52.3 mg/L
Uranium 248 mg/L
Vanadium 2120 mg/L
Zinc 404 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte Reporting Limit
ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL)
0.10 70 130 0.8 20
0.10 96 70 130 2.4 20
0.10 97 70 130 0.7 20
0.10 90 70 130 1.0 20
0.98 70 130 0.5 20
4.9 78 70 130 0.7 20
0.10 94 70 130 1.0 20
0.11 70 130 0.6 20
0.26 94 70 130 0.2 20
0.22 93 70 130 1.2 20
0.041 99 70 130 2.8 20
0.10 87 70 130 4.9 20
0.25 102 70 130 1.5 20
0.10 97 70 130 1.4 20
1.0 70 130 0.8 20
2.9 70 130 1.5 20
A -Analyte level was greater than four times the spike level -in
accordance with the method, percent recovery is not calculated
E -Estimated value -result exceeds the instrument upper
quantitation limit
A
AE
A
AE
A
Page 44 of 54
EN:RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data.
www.energylab.com
Billings, MT BOD.735.4489 • Casper, WY BBB.235.0515
Gillette, WY B&&.&B&.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Work Order: C20080962 Report Date: 09/04/20 ---
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPDLimit Qual
Method: E200.8 Analytical Run: ICPMS5-C_200827A
Lab ID: QCS 7 Initial Calibration Verification Standard 08/28/20 10:53
Arsenic 0.0497 mg/L
Cadmium 0.0240 mg/L
Molybdenum 0.0469 mg/L
Selenium 0.0526 mg/L
Silver 0.0244 mg/L
Tin 0.0500 mg/L
Zinc 0.0525 mg/L
Method: E200.8
Lab ID: LFB 7 Laboratory Fortified Blank
Arsenic 0.0525 mg/L
Cadmium 0.0520 mg/L
Molybdenum 0.0536 mg/L
Selenium 0.0518 mg/L
Silver 0.0212 mg/L
Tin 0.0526 mg/L
Zinc 0.0529 mg/L
Lab ID: MB-59028 7 Method Blank
Arsenic ND mg/L
Cadmium ND mg/L
Molybdenum ND mg/L
Selenium ND mg/L
Silver ND mg/L
Tin ND mg/L
Zinc ND mg/L
Lab ID: C20080962-002BMS 7 Sample Matrix Spike
Arsenic 26.6 mg/L
Cadmium 10.5 mg/L
Molybdenum 7.11 mg/L
Selenium 5.76 mg/L
Silver 1.86 mg/L
Tin 5.18 mg/L
Zinc 719 mg/L
Lab ID: C20080962-002BMSD 7 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Arsenic 27.2 mg/L
Cadmium 10.8 mg/L
Molybdenum 7.26 mg/L
Selenium 5.77 mg/L
Silver 1.89 mg/L
Tin 5.02 mg/L
Zinc 745 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte Reporting Limit
ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL)
0.0010 99 90 110
0.0010 96 90 110
0.0010 94 90 110
0.0010 105 90 110
0.0010 98 90 110
0.050 100 90 110
0.010 105 90 110
Batch: R261951
Run: ICPMS5-C_200827A 08/27/20 20:14
0.0010 105 85 115
0.0010 104 85 115
0.0010 107 85 115
0.0010 104 85 115
0.0010 106 85 115
0.050 105 85 115
0.010 106 85 115
Run: ICPMS5-C_200827A 08/28/20 15:34
8E-05
2E-05
0.0001
0.0002
2E-05
0.0002
0.003
Run: ICPMS5-C_200827A 08/28/20 15:51
0.010 70 130 A
0.010 85 70 130
0.011 -212 70 130 s
0.022 115 70 130
0.0041 93 70 130
0.050 104 70 130
0.29 70 130 AE
Run: ICPMS5-C_200827A 08/28/20 15:56
0.010 70 130 2.0 20 A
0.010 91 70 130 2.9 20
0.011 -209 70 130 2.1 20 s
0.0.22 115 70 130 0.2 20
0.0041 95 70 130 2.1 20
0.050 100 70 130 3.2 20
0.29 70 130 3.6 20 AE
A -Analyte level was greater than four times the spike level -in
accordance with the method, percent recovery is not calculated
E -Estimated value -result exceeds the instrument upper
quantitation limit
Page 45 of 54
EN:RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data.
www.energylab.com
Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515
Gillette, WY 866.686.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711
QA/QC Summary Report
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Work Order: C20080962 Report Date: 09/04/20
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD RPDLimit
Method: E200.8 Analytical Run: ICPMS5-C_200901A
Lab ID: QCS 2 Initial Calibration Verification Standard 09/01/2021 :36
Beryllium 0.0244 mg/L 0.0010 98 90 110
Thallium 0.0480 mg/L 0.00050 96 90 110
Method: E200.8 Batch: R262093
Lab ID: LFB 2 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: ICPMS5-C_200901A 09/01/20 13:18
Beryllium 0.0485 mg/L 0.0010 97 85 115
Thallium 0.0479 mg/L 0.00050 96 85 115
Lab ID: MB-59028 2 Method Blank Run: ICPMS5-C_200901A 09/01 /20 22: 15
Beryllium ND mg/L 0.0002
Thallium ND mg/L 5E-05
Lab ID: C20080962-001 BMS 2 Sample Matrix Spike Run: ICPMS5-C_200901A 09/01/20 22:28
Beryllium 7.04 mg/L 0.032 57 70 130 s
Thallium 5.64 mg/L 0.021 56 70 130 s
Lab ID: C20080962-001 BMSD 2 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: ICPMS5-C_200901A 09/01/20 22:32
Beryllium 6.94 mg/L 0.032 56 70 130 1.4 20 s
Thallium 5.59 mg/L 0.021 56 70 130 1.0 20 s
Method: E200.8 Analytical Run: ICPMS5-C_200902A
Lab ID: QCS Initial Calibration Verification Standard 09/02/20 11 :37
Thallium 0.0498 mg/L 0.00050 100 90 110
Method: E200.8 Batch: R262117
Lab ID: LFB Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: 1CPMS5-C_200902A 09/02/20 12:39
Thallium 0.0495 mg/L 0.00050 99 85 115
Lab ID: MB-59028 Method Blank Run: ICPMS5-C_200902A 09/02/20 14:58
Thallium 6E-05 mg/L 5E-05
Lab ID: C20080962-001 BMS Sample Matrix Spike Run: 1CPMS5-C_200902A 09/02/20 15: 11
Thallium 18.6 mg/L 0.052 74 70 130
Lab ID: C20080962-001 BMSD Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: ICPMS5-C_200902A 09/02/20 15: 15
Thallium 19.6 mg/L 0.052 78 70 130 5.0 20
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte Reporting Limit ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit (RL)
S -Spike recovery outside of advisory limits
Page 46 of 54
EI\ERGY Trust our People. Trust our Data.
www.energylab.com
Work Order Receipt Checklist
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Login completed by: Tracy L. Baughman
Reviewed by: Misty Stephens
Reviewed Date: 8/21/2020
Shipping container/cooler in good condition?
Custody seals intact on all shipping container(s)/cooler(s)?
Custody seals intact on all sample bottles?
Chain of custody present?
Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received?
Chain of custody agrees with sample labels?
Samples in proper container/bottle?
Sample containers intact?
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test?
All samples received within holding time?
(Exclude analyses that are considered field parameters
such as pH, DO, Res Cl, Sulfite, Ferrous Iron, etc.)
Temp Blank received in all shipping container(s)/cooler(s)?
Container/Temp Blank temperature:
Water -VOA vials have zero headspace?
Water -pH acceptable upon receipt?
Standard Reporting Procedures:
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes D
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
2.4°C Melted Ice
Yes D
Yes D
Billings, MT 800.735.4489 • Casper, WY 888.235.0515
Gillette, WY 888.686.7175 • Helena, MT 877.472.0711
C20080962
Date Received: 8/21/2020
Received by: kag
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No [{J
Carrier name: Next Day Air
Not Present D
Not Present D
Not Present 0
Not Applicable D
No VOA vials submitted 0
Not Applicable D
Lab measurement of analytes considered field parameters that require analysis within 15 minutes of sampling such as
pH, Dissolved Oxygen and Residual Chlorine, are qualified as being analyzed outside of recommended holding time.
Solid/soil samples are reported on a wet weight basis (as received) unless specifically indicated. If moisture corrected,
data units are typically noted as -dry. For agricultural and mining soil parameters/characteristics, all samples are dried
and ground prior to sample analysis.
Radiochemical precision results represent a 2-sigma Total Measurement Uncertainty.
Contact and Corrective Action Comments:
Dissolved Metals/Hardness were subsampled, filtered and preserved to pH <2 with 2 ml of nitric acid per 250 ml in the
laboratory. According to 40CFR136, samples for Dissolved Metals should be filtered and preserved within 15 minutes of
collection.
Page 47 of 54
EN:RGY m· Chain of Custody & Analytical Request Record
lMlturl'lapll.lnlslCIIIIDaill. www.energylab.com Page _1 __ of _1 __
--------.. -···-·--·------, --·o-··-··· -·•, --·---· ------..... ---· --·--···-·-··--· . . . -----.... -.. ,
COmpany/Name Energy Fuels CompanylNarM Energy Fuels Samples HAVE NOT BEEN
Canted Kathy Weinel Contact Kathy Wienel FIL TEREO or PRESERVED
Phone [phone] Phone [phone]
MaUing Addn,ss 225 Union Blvd, Suite 600 Malling Addr9U 225 Union Blvd, Suite 600
City, State.Zip Lakewood, CO 80228 City, State, Zip Lakewood, CO 80228
Email [e-mail] EmaH [e-mail]
Receive Invoice CIHard Copy •Email I Reoaive Report DHard Copy aEmall Rec:elve Report DHwd COpy CIEmal
Purchase Order IQuote rottle Onler Special~
C5645 a LEVEL IV a NElAC a EDDIEDT (f>lllllact latJonlby) a Otllar STD EFRI
Project Information IIM!b:Codn Analysis Reauested
Project Name, PWSID, Penni!, etc. Annual Tailings 2020 A-Air Al turnaround times are a; standard unless marked as W-W-0
SamplerName Tanner Holliday Sampler Phone [phone] Soils/ • RUSH.
s -Sollcla 0 0 Energy Laboratories
Sample Origin State Utah EPA/State Compliance • Yes IJNo V • Vegollllon > MUST be oontacted prior 1o 0
URANIUII IIINING CLIENTS IIUST lftdlc:at9 umpl• type. B-Bloaaay ~ 1 RUSH sample submittal for
0-Olher charges and scheduling -Cl NOT Soorce or Byproduct Mat«III IQ .c
C Source/Processed On! (Ground or Refined) .. CALL BEFORE SENDING OW-~ i u See Instructions Page • • 11e.12l Bvoroduct Material ccan ONLY be Submll!ed to ELI r.-.-1...oca11on1
.,, i • o-.
Sample Identification Collection Matrix .!!O I .. -d og EULAelD
(Name. I.OC8IIDn. lmnia/, /lfe.J Date Tme ~ ~~ C,u, ct) TAT 1MllllllD)' u.. Only
1 Cell 1 8/19/20 8:30am 3 Ww X () ~~l\q\o~
2 Cell 2 Slimes 8119/20 8:50 am 3 WW X
3 Cell4A 8/19/20 9:15am 3 w\,J X
4 Cell4A LDS 8119/20 9:35am 3 WW X
s Cell 4B 8/19/20 10:00am 3 WW X
a Cell 4B LDS 8/19/20 9:45am 3 WW X
1 Cell 65 8/19/20 9:15 am 3 WW X
8
9
10
Custody o.remne
RecordMUST12e-ooer Holl•(b>~ IS/.:2.D/2:Q..:.W IIUOrs-~aMfX:.d!"~ I l a I
be signed Relinqulaned by (print) oaterrme SignalUl9 "fil'WN,by-~ ~ ~----Ml\ .~ -~a\ "t-f _ D
Shipped By Cooler IO(s) Custody Seals
Y N C B
Intact y N Receipt Temp ·c Payment Type
Cash Check'-----
In certain circumstances, samples submitted to Energy Laboratories, Inc. may be subcontracted to other certified laboratories in order to complete the analysis requested.
This serves as notice of this possibility. All subcontracted data wffl be clea,ty notated on your analytical report. Eu-coc-10/18 v.3
'St ll)
0
<X) 'St
Q)
Cl m Cl.
EN::RGY Trust our People. Trust our Data.
www energylab.com
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
225 Union Blvd Ste 600
Lakewood, CO 80228-1826
Analytical Quote
Billings, MT 100.735.4419 • Casper, WY 198.235.0515
Gillette, WY 111.888.1175 • Helena, MT 817.472.0711
Quote #: C5645
Project Manager: Tessa Parke
Expires: 8/11/2020
TAT: 25 days
QC Level: STD
Project Name: Annual Tailings Program
Schedule: Annual Tailings Samples
Comments:
Alkallnlty
Alkalinity, Total as cacoJ A2320 B
Bicarbonate as HC03 A2320 B
carbonate as C03 A2320 B
** Induded In Alkallnlty Price
Anions by Ion Olromatography
Chloride E300.0
Sulfate E300.0
** Induded In Anions by Ion Chromatography Price
Fluoride
Fluoride A4S00-FC
** Included In Fluoride Price
Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
calclum E200.7_8
Magnesium E200.7_8
Potassium E200.7_8
Sodium E200.7_8
** Included in Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved Price
~-·~':iliiii'·· -~ ~' ~ .. ·. ····-:Adt1~·:~l?···ir,·,
Conductivity
Conductivity @ 25 C
** Included In Conductivity Price
pH
pH
A2510 B.
A4500-H B
Matrix: Aqueous
$10.00
5 mg/L **
5 mg/L **
5 mg/L **
$20.00
l mg/L **
1 mg/L **
$15.00
0.1 mg/L **
$220.00
1 mg/L **
l mg/L **
1 mg/l **
1 mg/L **
$10.00
. 5 umhos/cm **
$10.00
0.01 s.u. **
Page 1
Page 49 of 54
pH Measurement Temp
** Included In pH Price
Solids, Total Dlssolved
A4SOO-H B
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ A2540 C
180C
** Included In Solids, Total Olssolved Price
Nitrogen, Ammonia
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N E350.1
** Included In Nitrogen, Ammonia Price
Nitrogen, Nitrate+ Nlb"ite
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nlbite as N E353.2
** Induded In Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nlb1te Price
E245.1
** Included In Mercury, Dissolved Price
Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
Arsenic
Berylllum
cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Molybdenum
Nickel
selenium
Sliver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
E200.7_8
E200.7_8
E200.7_8
E200.7_8
E200.7_8
E200.7_8
E200.7_8
E200.7_8
E200.7_8
E200.7_8
E200.7_8
E200.7_8
E200.7_8
E200.7_8
E200.7_8
E200.7_8
E200.7_8
Zinc E200.7_8
** Included In Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved Price
--Included in Major Ions Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved Price
A1030 E
Solids, Total Dissolved -Calculated A1030 E
10 mg/L
0.05 mg/L
0.01 mg/L
0.0001 mg/L
1 ug/L
1 ug/L
1 ug/L
5 ug/L
5 ug/L
5 ug/L
20 ug/L
1 ug/L
1 ug/L
1 ug/L
5 ug/L
1 ug/L
1 ug/L
0.5 ug/L
SO ug/L
0.3 ug/L
10 ug/L
10 ug/L
-250.01
-250.01 mg/L
**
$20.00
**
$30.00
**
$50.00
**
$25.00
**
"'"' **
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
$0.00
$0.00
• \ • •I~ : • ~ f . :-..·. :· .. · .~~
Page2
Page 50 of 54
8260-Volatlle Organic Compounds-$250.00
Extended List
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane SW8260B 1 ug/L **
1,1,1-Tr1chloroethane SW8260B 1 ug/L **
1,1,2,2-Tetrac:hloroethane SW8260B 1 ug/L **
1,1,2-Trichloroethane SW8260B 1 ug/L **
1,1-Dlchloroethane SW8260B 1 ug/L **
1,1-Dlchloroethene SW8260B 1 ug/L **
1, 1-Dlchloropropene SW8260B 1 ug/L **
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene SW8260B 1 ug/L **
1,2,3-Trlchloropropane SW8260B 1 ug/L **
1,2,4-Trlchlorobenzene SW82608 1 ug/L **
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene SW8260B 1 ug/L **
1,2-Dlbrorno-3-chloropropane SW8260B 1 ug/L **
1,2-Dlbrornoethane SW8260B 1 ug/L **
1,2-Dlchlorobenzene SW82608 1 ug/L **
1,2-Dlchloroethane SW8260B 1 ug/L **
1,2-Dlchloropropane SW82608 1 ug/L **
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene SW82608 1 ug/L **
1,3-Dlchlorobenzene SW82608 1 ug/L **
1,3-Dlchloropropane SW8260B 1 ug/L **
1,4-Dlchlorobenzene SW8260B 1 ug/L **
2,2-Dlchloropropane SW8260B 1 ug/l **
2-chloroethyl vlnyl ether SW8260B 1 ug/L **
2-Chlorotoluene SW8260B 1 ug/L **
2-Hexanone SW8260B 20 ug/L **
4-Chlorotoluene SW8260B 1 ug/L **
Acetone SW8260B 20 ug/L **
Acetonlb11e SW8260B 20 ug/L **
Aaoleln SW8260B 20 ug/L **
Acrylonlb11e SW8260B 20 ug/L **
Benzene SW8260B 1 ug/L **
Bromobenzene SW8260B 1 ug/L **
Bromochloromethane SW82608 1 ug/L **
Bromodlchloromethane SW8260B 1 ug/L **
Bromoform SW8260B 1 ug/L **
Bromomethane SW8260B 1 ug/L **
carbon dlsulflde SW8260B 1 ug/L **
carbon tetrachloride SW8260B 1 ug/L **
Chlorobenzene SW8260B 1 ug/L **
Chlorodlbromomethane SW8260B 1 ug/l **
Chloroethane SW8260B 1 ug/L **
Chlorofonn SW82608 1 ug/L **
Chloromethane SW8260B 1 ug/l **
cis-1,2-Dlchloroethene SW8260B 1 ug/L **
ds-1,3-Dlchloropropene SW8260B 1 ug/L **
Dibromomethane SW8260B 1 ug/L **
Dichlorodlfluoromethane SW8260B 1 ug/L **
Ethyl benzene SW8260B 1 ug/L **
Hexachlorobutadiene SW8260B 1 ug/L **
Ioclomethane SW8260B 1 ug/L **
Page3
Page 51 of 54
Isopropytbenzene SW8260B 1 ug/L **
m+p-Xytenes SW8260B 1 ug/L **
Methyl ethyl ketone SW8260B 20 ug/L **
Methyl lsobutyl ketone SW8260B 20 ug/L **
Methyl tert-butyl ether SW8260B 1 ug/L **
(MT13E)
Methylene dlloride SW8260B 1 ug/L **
Naphthalene SW8260B 1 ug/L **
n-Butylbenzene SW8260B 1 ug/L **
n-Propylbenzene SW8260B 1 ug/L **
o-Xylene SW8260B 1 ug/L **
p-Isopropyltoluene SW8260B 1 ug/L **
sec-Butyl benzene SW8260B 1 ug/L **
Styrene SW8260B 1 ug/L **
tert-Butylbenzene SW8260B 1 ug/L **
Tetrachloroethene SW8260B 1 ug/L **
Toluene SW8260B 1 ug/L **
b"ans-1,2-Dlchloroethene SW8260B 1 ug/L **
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene SW8260B 1 ug/L **
Tr1chloroethene SW8260B 1 ug/L **
Trichlorofluoromethane SW82608 1 ug/L **
Vlnyl acetate SW8260B 1 ug/L **
Vinyl chloride SW8260B 1 ug/L **
Xylenes, Total SW8260B 0 ug/L **
** Inducted In 8260-VolatJle Organic Compounds-Extended List Price
8260-Volattle Organic Compounds-$130.00
Short List
Tetrahyclrofuran SW8260B 10 ug/L **
•• Included In 8260-Volattle Organic Compounds-Short List Price
~---·iM1'·(tllrPl~'.4.''·.'·~~:~z:)ti,;Ji:\~},,ii~t:a'-( ·,::·,,:i~}&,~\~~·j :·~~ . .';}·,,,:'i':\,t,·.'.1f ·:,:.0~),t~::~~~1.};..:/;.\ ..r,t 9.:•}>•:1;-.;:,·{)>, :r,.,, \~ ~I!'~~. \ ,~~1111'!.~~,~~-,~{.~~~~ -~~ ~~~~~t:~~~~:~-~~·=~~ ~.~~'); ~ ~: '1 ~·\;· ·; '~·:~{f~"$r,t':!)~ , ~~~\\/,'~~:'4~.\~.'''..'.~-~. ·~: •\:\~.)>!\!~~ .. , !-.),~\;: .~-'~ttr~Y ' ,' ,·~;: ... •,'.,. ~·; .. ~,',rS;:~;-:','./ ',.' ·"\'~~~-' .,'::,~:·~:.>,:,' ··'::' '
5eml-Volattle Organic Compaunds $350.00
1,2,+ Trichlorobenzene SW8270C 10 ug/L **
1,2-Dlchlorobenzene SW8270C 10 ug/L **
1,3-otchlorobenzene SW8270C 10 ug/L **
1,4-Dlchlorobenzene SW8270C 10 ug/L **
1-Methylnaphthalene SW8270C 10 ug/L ••
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol SW8270C 10 ug/L **
2,4,6-Tr1chlorophenol SW8270C 10 ug/L **
2,4-Dlchlorophenol SW8270C 10 ug/L **
2,4-Dlmethylphenol SW8270C 10 ug/L **
2,4-Dlnltrophenol SW8270C 50 ug/L **
2,4-Dlnltrotoluene SW8270C 10 ug/L **
2,6-Dinltrotoluene SW8270C 10 ug/L **
2-Chloronaphthalene SW8270C 10 ug/L **
2-0llorophenol SW8270C 10 ug/L **
2-Methylnaphthalene SW8270C 10 ug/L **
2-Nitrophenol SW8270C 10 ug/L **
3,3 • -Dlchlorobenzldine SW8270C 10 ug/L **
4,6-Dinltro-2-methylphenol SW8270C 50 ug/L **
Page4
Page 52 of 54
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether SW8270C 10 ug/L **
4-0,loro-3-methylphenol SW8270C 10 ug/L **
4-Chlorophenol SW8270C 10 ug/L **
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether SW8270C 10 ug/L **
4-Nitrophenol SW8270C SO ug/L **
Acenaphthene SW8270C 10 ug/L **
Acenaphthylene SW8270C 10 ug/L **
Anthracene SW8270C 10 ug/L **
Azobenzene SW8270C 10 ug/L **
Benzidine SW8270C 10 ug/L **
Benzo(a)anthracene SW8270C 10 ug/L **
Benzo(a)pyrene SW8270C 10 ug/L **
Benzo(b)fluoranthene SW8270C 10 ug/L **
Benzo(g,h,l)perylene SW8270C 10 ug/L **
Benzo(k)fluoranthene SW8270C 10 ug/L **
bls(-2-chloroethoxy)Methane SW8270C 10 ug/L **
bls(-2-chloroethyl)Ether SW8270C 10 ug/L **
bls(2-chlorolsopropyl)Ether SW8270C 10 ug/L **
bls(2-ethylhexyl)Phthalate SW8270C 10 ug/L **
Butylbenzylphthalate SW8270C 10 ug/L **
Chrysene SW8270C 10 ug/L **
Dlbenzo{a,h)anthracene SW8270C 10 ug/L **
Diethyl phthalate SW8270C 10 ug/L **
Dimethyl phthalate SW8270C 10 ug/L **
Dl-n·butyl phthalate SW8270C 10 ug/L **
01-n-octyl phthalate SW8270C 10 ug/L **
Fluoranthene SW8270C 10 ug/L **
Ruorene SW8270C 10 ug/L **
Hexachlorobenzene SW8270C 10 ug/L **
Hexachlorobutadlene SW8270C 10 ug/L **
Hexachlorocydopentadlene SW8270C 10 ug/L **
Hexachloroethane SW8270C 10 ug/L **
Indeno(l,2,3-c:d)pyrene SW8270C 10 ug/L **
Isophorone SW8270C 10 ug/L **
m+p-Oesols SW8270C 10 ug/L *"'
Naphthalene SW8270C 10 ug/L **
Nltrobenzene SW8270C 10 ug/L **
n·Nltrosodlmethylamlne SW8270C 10 ug/L *"'
n-Nltroso-di-n-propylamlne SW8270C 10 ug/L "'*
n-Nltrosodiphenylamlne SW8270C 10 ug/L **
o-Cresol SW8270C 10 ug/L **
Pentachlorophenol SW8270C 50 ug/L **
Phenanthrene SW8270C 10 ug/L **
Phenol SW8270C 10 ug/L **
Pyrene SW8270C 10 ug/L **
Pyridine SW8270C 10 ug/L **
** Inducled In Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds Price
Page5
Page 53 of 54
Digestion, Mercury by Ct/AA E245.1
Sample Filtering, Metals
Separatory Funnel Liquid-Liquid Ext. SW3510C
Schedule Price/Sample:
$0.00
$20.00
$0.00
$1160.00
1 • • 1•. l, · ·, ' •, :.-
Annual Tailings Samples
Quote Sub Total:
Discount:
Misc Charges:
Quote Total:
1 ··J .•I
$1160.00
$1160.00
0.00%
$0.00
$1160.00
Comments: As of January 1st, 2012 ELI will begin charging a $2.00 per sample surcharge for sample management. This fee
will be applied to all solid and aqueous samples.
Quoted prices are based on net 30 days payment of invoices. Discounts will not apply if terms are not met.
Quoted prices reflect standard tum around time of-25 working days. Additional charges may apply for accelerated TAT.
Please advise ELI as to your project specific requirements.
SUBCONTRACT LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Any discounts would not apply for analysis that is subcontracted to a laboratory outside of an Energy Laboratories, Inc.
facility. Subcontract laboratory prices are subject to change without prior notification.
URANIUM MINE SAMPLES
Any 11e(2) or source material samples are subject to a sample management/handling fee of $50 per work order.
SAMPLE CLEAN UP
Additional charges will apply for any sample with atypical clean up. This will Include, but ls not limited to additional filters
and/or increased analyst time.
Shipping charges are subject to change based off current UPS prices.
To aaaun, that the quoted analyala and pricing apeclflcatJona are provided, pleaaa Include the Quote ID number
referenced above on the Chain of Custody or sample aubmlttal documents.
Page6
Page 54 of 54
teJ =II Laboratories LLc
a member of The GEL Group INC
PO Box 50712 Char1estorL SC 29417
2040 Sayage Road Charleston. SC 29407
P 843.556.8171
F 84$.706. 1178
September 30, 2020
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Re: Tailings 2020 Characterization
Work Order: 519405
Dear Ms. Weinel:
GEL Laboratories, LLC (GEL) appreciates the opportunity to provide the enclosed analytical results for the
sample(s) we received on August 21, 2020. This revised data report has been prepared and reviewed in
accordance with GEL's standard operating procedures. This package was revised to include additional SVOC
compounds.
Test results for NELAP or ISO 17025 accredited tests are verified to meet the requirements of those standards,
with any exceptions noted. The results reported relate only to the items tested and to the sample as received by
the laboratory. These results may not be reproduced except as full reports without approval by the laboratory.
Copies ofGEL's accreditations and certifications can be found on our website at www.gel.com.
Our policy is to provide high quality, personalized analytical services to enable you to meet your analytical needs
on time every time. We trust that you will find everything in order and to your satisfaction. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 4289.
Purchase Order: DW16138
Enclosures
Sincerely,
Julie Robinson
Project Manager
gel.com
Page 2 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Tailings 2020 Characterization
SDG: 519405
This package was revised to include additional SVOC compounds.
September 30, 2020
Laboratory Identification:
GEL Laboratories LLC
2040 Savage Road
Charleston, South Carolina 29407
[phone]
Summary:
Receipt Narrative
for
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
SDG: 519405
Sam pie receipt: The samples arrived at GEL Laboratories LLC, Charleston, South Carolina on August 21, 2020
for analysis. The samples were delivered with proper chain of custody documentation and signatures. All sample
containers arrived without any visible signs of tampering or breakage. There are no additional comments
concerning sample receipt.
Sample Identification: The laboratory received the following samples:
Laboratory ID Client ID
519405001 Cell l
519405002 Cell 2 Slimes
519405003 Cell 4A
519405004 Cell 4A LOS
519405005 Cell 4B
519405006 Cell 4B LOS
519405007 Cell 65
519405008 Trip Blank
Case Narrative:
Sample analyses were conducted using methodology as outlined in GEL's Standard Operating Procedures. Any
technical or administrative problems during analysis, data review, and reduction are contained in the analytical
case narratives in the enclosed data package.
Page 3 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
The enclosed data package contains the following sections: Case Narrative, Chain of Custody, Cooler Receipt
Checklist, Data Package Qualifier Definitions and data from the following fractions: GC/MS Semivolatile,
GC/MS Volatile, General Chemistry and Radiochemistry.
Page 4 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Julie Robinson
Project Manager
5JC\L!05
Samples Shipped to:
Project
Annual Tailings 2020
Sample ID
Cell 1
eell 2 Slimes
eell4A
eell 4A LOS
eeU4B
Cell 4B LOS
eell65
Sheet 1 of 1
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Gel Laboratories Contact: Tanner Holliday ------------2040 Savage Road Ph: 435 678 4115
Charleston, SC 29407 [e-mail]
Samplers Name
Tanner Holliday
Date Time
Collected Collected Laboratory Analysis Requested
8/19/2020
8/19/2020
8/19/2020
8/19/2020
8/19/2020
8/19/2020
8/19/2020
Dissolved Gross Alpha, Thorium (228, 230, 232) Uranium
830 (233/234, 235/236, 238), Ra-226, specific gravity, voes, SVOCs
Dissolved Gross Alpha, Thorium (228, 230, 232) Uranium
850 (233/234, 235/236, 238), Ra-226, specific gravity, voes, SVOCs
Dissolved Gross Alpha, Thorium (228, 230, 232) Uranium
915 (233/234, 235/236, 238), Ra-226, specific gravity, voes, svoes
Dissolved Gross Alpha, Thorium (228, 230, 232) Uranium
935 (233/234, 235/236, 238), Ra-226, specific gravity, voes, svoes
Dissolved Gross Alpha, Thorium (228, 230, 232) Uranium
1000 (233/234, 235/236, 238), Ra-226, specific gravity, voes, SVOCs
Dissolved Gross Alpha, Thorium (228, 230, 232) Uranium
945 (233/234, 235/236, 238), Ra-226, specific gravity, voes, SVOCs
Dissolved Gross Alpha, Thorium (228, 230, 232) Uranium
915 (233/234, 235/236, 238), Ra-226, specific gravity, voes, svocs
Comments: SAMPLES ARE NOT FIELD FILTERED -PLEASE FILTER UPON RECEIPT! SAMPLES ARE NOT
PRESERVED -pH is as collected! See Julie Robinson for technical questions. No LOCUS UPLOAD,. Methods·usad
= same as 488668
Page 5 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Date/'9me Received By:(Signature) il,/J..b,~1:>
100
Date/Time Received By:(Signature)
lm"!I i L 'Ji°Knlor·Ps 1 • ,. I cl 1 '" .1,. I SAMPLE RECEIPT & REVIEW FORM
Client: 1 JN\V\\ SDGIARICOC/Work 011kr: "'/L/ l..JCb
Received By: /7:,.. Jl ____
61-Dute Received: 'nA .. Af 2/ 2020
/ I' Cittlc Appij:,blr.
FedEx fapress FedEx Grllund UPS Field Servi<·es Clluricr 01hcr -Carrier and Tracking Number IQ1 V'4Y 01 'IS46 , 312. ' [Z. -3e
• IZ 187 V,4\/ 01 q1,o 4q~2 -3 c:.
Susprctcd Hu7.ilnl l11fonnallon l'.l C ~If Ne, CounL, > IOOcpm on s.,mples 1101 n"11i;cd "mdiooc1ive", contact tlic R:uliation Safety Group for rWlher inl'estigalion. ... 2:
,I'
H.lzard Class Shipped: UNff:
i\lShllH>old as, DOT li.u,rdous? If UN2910. ls tho Radioactiv.: Shipmcm SurvcyCompliam'/ Yes_ No_
B) Did 1h• clie111 deslgn,ne 1hc samples on: 10 ho II" ~ notation or radiooaivc stickers on containers equ:d clicnl U:csigmnion.
received as r.idiooc\i,•c?
C) Did the RSO classify the samples as / Ma.,imum Net Coums Obse"•cd•~d Coums -An:a Bocksround Counts!: _l![___CJ>M I mR/Hr
radlo:Jaivc? C\osslRcd as: I~ Rnrl 2 Rad 3 -
D) Did 1he client desienate samoles are hoz.lnlous? ,,.. ~ noullion or hazard labels on cuntuiuers i::quul client di:si111a.tiou.
If Dor Eis )'!S, sclca H:nonls below.
E) Did the RSO ido111ify oossiblc hnzartls?
,, PCB's Flammable Forcil!n Soil RCRA Asbestos Beryllium Other.
Sample Receipt Critcrln :a < " Commcnts/Quolincrs (Requln,d for Nou-Confom,ing Items) ;.. z 2:
Shipping conwiners received inrncl and Ciro!< Ap11~<0bk; Seals broken 0.1ru:JtcJ cnn1:ilnC!r Leaking con1~hu:t 0~1cr (d«cn'bc>
l sealed?
2 Chain of cush.xly documen1s ioclu<led Clrcl< Applieobk: CEtnl conl:,c\cd ond flfOildcd COC COC cn:al<d upon rc«lpl
wi~, shipmen!?
1'1e~""'1iou Mc1b0tt Wet la, kt Poc!;s Dry ice None Oll,cr.
3 Samples requiring cold preservation •all tcmpcr.ilures ore reronl<d In Celsius -TEMP:
within (0 ,,;, 6 de>:-C)?•
Daily check pcrforn-ed and passed on IR Tempcrutun, Device Scrlnl H: I liil • :1n
4 1cmpera1urc gun? Seco11d:uy Tcmpcr:11ure Device Sena!# (If Applicable):
Circle Applit>blo: S.ols broken D.101"3C("d tollf::i.inc-r f . ..c.ol.ini:conr:tincr Olhcr ldcmibt) s Sample containers intact and scaled?
Samples requiring chemical preservation Somp!i: ID'.s i1nd Con1a[neu A.ff'C"C'ttd:
6 al prnper pH? .,,.
I( l)N.Jcr-..""Jaion :uldc~.1D1I:
If Yes, ore Encores or Soil Kils p1cse111 for solids? Y cs No __ NA__(lr )'CS, Ulke to VOA Fn::cur)
Do any sampiesrequire Volatile Do liquid VO,\ ,•ials co11t:iin acid pccsc:r,ntion? Yes NoL N1\_(lfunlmow11, sclce1 No)
7 Analysis? ,. An: liguM VOA yjoJs free ofhoallsp.ice? Yes~ No_ NA __
Si1;1plc ID's .ind conl3iners ;iCfoclcJ:
10'J nnd lCSls :iffCClCd!
ll Samples received within holding time?
Sample JD's on COC match ID's lln / lD's ru,d co11l.Ql11ors Qffoctcd:
9 b.lules?
Dote & time lln COC match date & lime Cin::k i\(ljliic:iblc: No dates 011 co,uolncrs No limes on cont:1it,crs COC mlssl11g info Other (describe)
10 on bollles?
Number of containers recei"ed match J Cin::lc i\ppllC>hk: No conlninor cou111 011 COC Other (ckscrib<l
11 number indicated on COC'!
12 Are Sllmple containers idenlifiable as
GEL orovided bv use of GEL labels?
COC fonn is properly signed in Cin::lc Applicnble: NOi t\!U1,quishcd Other (dt$ailx)
13 relinquished/received sectillns?
Con1me111s (Use Con1inualion Fonn if needed):
.
r l "1 1i7 '14\/ Ol q2,57 •H,Oi-2\C
. PM (<H' PMA) ,~vie,~: lnitials\1',..I V-(.J' Date ~ \ 'LY \ 1J.) Pai,oe _l_ or-\--
'
GL-CHL-SR-001 Rev7
Page6 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
GEL Work Order/SDG: 519405
Client SDG: 519405
Annual Tailings 2020
Project Manager:
Project Name:
Purchase Order:
Package Level:
EDD Format:
Julie Robinson
DNMI00107 Tailings 2020 Characterization
DW16138
LEVEL3
EIM_DNMI
Collect
GELID Client Sample ID Client Sample Desc. Date & Time
519405001 Cell 1
519405002 Cell 2 Slimes
519405003 Cell4A
519405004 Cell 4A LDS
519405005 Cell4B
519405006 Cell4B LDS
519405007 Cell65
519405008 Trip Blank
Client Sample ID
-001 Cell 1
-002 Cell 2 Slimes
Status Tests/Methods
REVW ASTM D 5057 Specific Gravity
REVW Rad 2 Aliquot for distribution
throughout the lab
REVW Alphaspec Th, Liquid
19-AUG-20 08:30
19-AUG-20 08:50
19-AUG-20 09:15
19-AUG-20 09:35
19-AUG-20 10:00
19-AUG-20 09:45
19-AUG-20 09:15
19-AUG-20 08:30
Product
Reference
REVW U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 U-233/234,U-
235/236
REVW GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Gross Alpha
Liquid
REVW Lucas Cell, Ra226, liquid
REVW Laboratory Composite
REVW SW846 8260B Volatiles
REVW BNA Tentatively Identified
Compound (TIC) Search
REVW SW846 3510C/8270D SVOA
(Separatory Funnel)
REVW ASTM D 5057 Specific Gravity
REVW Rad 2 Aliquot for distribution
throughout the lab
REVW Alphaspec Th, Liquid
RAD2
REVW U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 U-233/234,U-
235/236
REVW GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Gross Alpha
Liquid
REVW Lucas Cell, Ra226, liquid
Work Order Due Date: 21-SEP-20
Package Due Date: 18-SEP-20
EDD Due Date:
Due Date:
JAR1
Receive Time # of
Date & Time Zone Cont.
21-AUG-20 09:50 -2 7
21-AUG-20 09:50 -2 6
21-AUG-20 09:50 -2 7
21-AUG-20 09:50 -2 7
21-AUG-20 09:50 -2 7
21-AUG-20 09:50 -2 7
21-AUG-20 09:50 -2 7
21-AUG-20 09:50 -2 3
Fax Date PM Comments
21-SEP-20
21-SEP-20
Lab
Matrix
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
Handle these samples carefully,
they are low pH with high
metals. Use container .02 for all
analyse
Handle these samples carefully,
they are low pH with high
metals. Use container .02 for all
analyse
Report Date: 30-SEP-20
Work Order: 519405
Page 1 of 8
Collector: C
Prelogin #: 202008114643
Project Workdef ID: 1330584
SDG Status: Closed
Logged by:
Fax Days to
Due Date Process CofC#
Prelog Lab Field
Group QC QC
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
Aux Data
2 y
Receive
Codes
RAD2
....... ~
or. 0 "" O', .......
or.
RAD2 d
Q
r:/).
O', ....... .......
~
r--
11)
~ A,..
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
REVW Laboratory Composite RAD2
REVW SW846 82608 Volatiles
REVW 8NA Tentatively Identified
Compound (TIC) Search
REVW SW846 3510C/8270D SVOA
(Separatory Funnel)
-003 Cell 4A REVW ASTM D 5057 Specific Gravity
REVW Rad 2 Aliquot for distribution
throughout the lab
REVW Alphaspec Th, Liquid
REVW U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 U-233/234,U-
235/236
REVW GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Gross Alpha
Liquid
REVW Lucas Cell, Ra226, liquid
REVW Laboratory Composite RAD2
REVW SW846 82608 Volatiles
REVW 8NA Tentatively Identified
Compound (TIC) Search
REVW SW846 3510C/8270D SVOA
(Separatory Funnel)
-004 Cell 4A LDS REVW ASTM D 5057 Specific Gravity
REVW Rad 2 Aliquot for distribution
throughout the lab
REVW Alphaspec Th, Liquid
REVW U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 U-233/234,U-
235/236
REVW GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Gross Alpha
Liquid
REVW Lucas Cell, Ra226, liquid
REVW Laboratory Composite RAD2
REVW SW846 82608 Volatiles
REVW 8NA Tentatively Identified
Compound (TIC) Search
REVW SW846 3510C/82700 SVOA
(Separatory Funnel)
-005 Cell 48 REVW ASTM D 5057 Specific Gravity
REVW Rad 2 Aliquot for distribution
throughout the lab
REVW Alphaspec Th, Liquid
REVW U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238 U-233/234,U-
235/236
REVW GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Gross Alpha
Liquid
REVW Lucas Cell, Ra226, liquid
REVW Laboratory Composite RAD2
REVW SW846 82608 Volatiles
REVW 8NA Tentatively Identified
Compound (TIC) Search
REVW SW846 3510C/8270D SVOA
(Separatory Funnel)
Handle these samples carefully,
they are low pH with high
metals. Use container .02 for all
analyse
Handle these samples carefully,
they are low pH with high
metals. Use container .02 for all
analyse
Handle these samples carefully,
they are low pH with high
metals. Use container .02 for all
analyse
Report Date: 30-SEP-20
Work Order: 519405
Page 2 of 8
RAD2
RAD2
RAD2 >
(I) ~
lr)
0 "q"
a'\ ......
lr)
ci
Cl r;/1
a'\ ...... ......
(+-,<
0
00
(I)
b1) c,::S
~
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
-006 Cell 48 LDS REVW ASTM D 5057 Specific Gravity
REVW Rad 2 Aliquot for distribution
throughout the lab
REVW Alphaspec Th, Liquid
REVW U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238
REVW GFPC,Total Alpha Radium,
Liquid
REVW Lucas Cell, Ra226, liquid
REVW Laboratory Composite
REVW SW846 8260B Volatiles
REVW BNA Tentatively Identified
Compound (TIC) Search
REVW SW846 3510C/8270D SVOA
(Separatory Funnel)
-007 Cell 65 REVW ASTM D 5057 Specific Gravity
REVW Rad 2 Aliquot for distribution
throughout the lab
REVW Alphaspec Th, Liquid
REVW U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238
REVW GFPC, Total Alpha Radium,
Liquid
REVW Lucas Cell, Ra226, liquid
REVW Laboratory Composite
REVW SW846 8260B Volatiles
REVW BNA Tentatively Identified
Compound (TIC) Search
REVW SW846 3510C/8270D SVOA
(Separatory Funnel)
-008 Trip Blank REVW SW846 8260B Volatiles
U-233/234,U-
235/236
Gross Alpha
RAD2
U-233/234,U-
235/236
Gross Alpha
RAD2
Product: MSDTIC_L Workdef ID: 1508377 In Product Group? No
Method:
Product Description: BNA Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) Search
Samples: 001, 002, 003, 004, 005, 006, 007
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS# Parmname
TIC
Handle these samples carefully,
they are low pH with high
metals. Use container .02 for all
analyse
Handle these samples carefully,
they are low pH with high
metals. Use container .02 for all
analyse
Group Name:
Client RDL or
PQL & Unit
Reporting
Units
ug/L
Group Reference:
Report Date: 30-SEP-20
Work Order: 519405
Path: 8270D
Product Reference:
Page 3 of 8
RAD2
RAD2
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
IS y y No
...... ;>-
~
tr)
0
'<:t °' ......
tr)
C)
Cl r:/1
°' ...... ......
4-;
0
°' (!)
~ p..
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
Product: ASP_ THL Workdef ID: 1371096 In Product Group? No
Method: DOE EML HASL-300, Th-01-RC Modified
Product Description: Alphaspec Th , Liquid
Samples: 001, 002, 003, 004, 005, 006, 007
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS#
14274-82-9
14269-63-7
7440-29-1
Product: ASP _UUL
Parmname
Thorium-228
Thorium-230
Thorium-232
Workdef ID: 1371097 In Product Group? No
Method: DOE EML HASL -300, U-02-RC Modified
Product Description: U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238
Samples: 001, 002, 003, 004, 005, 006, 007
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS# Parmname
13968-55-3/13966-Uranium-233/234
15117-96-1/13982-Uranium-235/236
7440-61-1 Uranium-238
Product: GFCTORAL Workdef ID: 1371098
Method: EPA 903.0
Product Description: GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Liquid
Samples: 001, 002, 003, 004, 005, 006, 007
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS# Parmname
Gross Radium Alpha
Product: LUC26RAL WorkdeflD: 1371099
Method: EPA 903.1 Modified
Product Description: Lucas Cell, Ra226, liquid
Samples: 001,002, 003, 004,005,006, 007
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS# Parmname
13982-63-3 Radium-226
In Product Group? No
In Product Group? No
Group Name:
Client RDL or
PQL&Unit
Group Name:
Client RDL or
PQL & Unit
Group Name:
Client RDL or
PQL& Unit
Group Name:
Client RDL or
PQL & Unit
Reporting
Units
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
Reporting
Units
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
Reporting
Units
pCi/L
Report Date: 30-SEP-20
Work Order: 519405
Page 4 of 8
Group Reference:
Path: High Rad
Product Reference:
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
REG
REG
REG
y
y
y
y
y
y
No
Group Reference:
Path: High Rad
Product Reference: U-233/234,U-235/236
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
REG
REG
REG
y
y
y
y
y
y
No
Group Reference:
Path: High Rad
Product Reference: Gross Alpha
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
REG y y No
Group Reference:
Path: High Rad
Product Reference:
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Reporting Parm Included Included Custom
Units Function in Sample? in QC? List?
pCi/L REG y y No
...... > (l.)
lr)
0 -st" °' ......
lr)
0 0 r./)
°' ...... -4-<
0 -(l.)
oJ) ell 0....
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report Report Date: 30-SEP-20
Work Order: 519405
Page 5 of 8
Product: LABCOMP _L WorkdeflD: 1371213 In Product Group? No Group Name: Group Reference:
Method: Path: High Rad
Product Description: Laboratory Composite Product Reference: RAD2
Samples: 001, 002, 003, 004, 005, 006, 007 Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly Client RDL or Reporting Parm Included Included Custom
CAS# Parmname PQL & Unit Units Function in Sample? in QC? List?
0
Product: MSD1 OC70DL Workdef ID: 1508378 In Product Group? No Group Name: Group Reference:
Method: SW846 3510C/8270D Path: SW846 351 OC/8270D
Product Description: SW846 3510C/8270D SVOA (Separatory Funnel) Product Reference:
Samples: 001, 002, 003, 004, 005, 006, 007 Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly Client RDL or Reporting Parm Included Included Custom
CAS# Parmname PQL & Unit Units Function in Sample? in QC? List?
120-82-1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y No
95-50-1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y
122-66-7 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y
541-73-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y
106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y
3855-82-1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 ug/L IS y y
90-12-0 1-Methylnaphthalene 1 ug/L ug/L REG y y
95-95-4 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y
118-79-6 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 10 ug/L ug/L SURR y y
88-06-2 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y
120-83-2 2,4-Dichlorophenol 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y ......
105-67-9 2,4-Dimethylphenol 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y :>
51-28-5 2,4-Dinitrophenol 20 ug/L ug/L REG y y ~
121-14-2 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y V)
0 v 606-20-2 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y °' ....
91-58-7 2-Chloronaphthalene 1 ug/L ug/L REG y y V)
95-57-8 2-Chlorophenol 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y 0
321-60-8 2-Fluorobiphenyl 10 ug/L ug/L SURR y y 0 (/)
367-12-4 2-Fluorophenol 10 ug/L ug/L SURR y y
°' 534-52-1 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y ---,
91-57-6 2-Methylnaphthalene 1 ug/L ug/L REG y y '-'--' 0
88-75-5 2-Nitrophenol 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y --119-93-7 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y (I)
bl)
(,::I
P-1
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report Report Date: 30-SEP-20
Work Order:519405
Page 6 of 8
101-55-3 4-Bromophenylphenylether 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y
59-50-7 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y
7005-72-3 4-Chlorophenylphenylether 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y
100-02-7 4-Nitrophenol 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y
83-32-9 Acenaphthene 1 ug/L ug/L REG y y
15067-26-2 Acenaphthene-d 10 ug/L IS y y
208-96-8 Acenaphthylene 1 ug/L ug/L REG y y
120-12-7 Anthracene 1 ug/L ug/L REG y y
92-87-5 Benzidine 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y
56-55-3 Benzo(a)anthracene 1 ug/L ug/L REG y y
50-32-8 Benzo(a)pyrene 1 ug/L ug/L REG y y
205-99-2 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 ug/L ug/L REG y y
191-24-2 Benzo(ghi)perylene 1 ug/L ug/L REG y y
207-08-9 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1 ug/L ug/L REG y y
85-68-7 Butylbenzylphthalate 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y
218-01-9 Chrysene 1 ug/L ug/L REG y y
1719-03-5 Chrysene-d 12 ug/L IS y y
84-74-2 Di-n-butylphthalate 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y
117-84-0 Di-n-octylphthalate 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y
53-70-3 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 1 ug/L ug/L REG y y
84-66-2 Diethylphthalate 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y
131-11-3 Dimethylphthalate 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y
122-39-4 Diphenylamine 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y
206-44-0 Fluoranthene 1 ug/L ug/L REG y y
86-73-7 Fluorene 1 ug/L ug/L REG y y ......
118-74-1 Hexachlorobenzene 10 ug/L REG y y > ug/L ~ 87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y V)
77-47-4 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y 0 s::t
67-72-1 Hexachloroethane 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y O's ......
V)
193-39-5 lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1 ug/L ug/L REG y y ci 78-59-1 lsophorone 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y 0
62-75-9 N-Methyl-N-nitrosomethylamine 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y 00
621-64-7 N-Nitrosodipropylamine 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y O's ......
91-20-3 Naphthalene -· 1 ug/L ug/L REG y y ......
4-;
1146-65-2 Naphthalene-dB ug/L IS y y 0
98-95-3 Nitrobenzene 10 ug/L ug/L REG y y N ......
(l)
00 ro 0...
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
4165-60--0 Nitrobenzene-d5
87-86-5 Pentachlorophenol
1520-96-3 Perylene-d12
85-01-8 Phenanthrene
1517-22-2 Phenanthrene-d10
108-95-2 Phenol
4165-62-2 Phenol-d5
129-00-0 Pyrene
110-86-1 Pyridine
108-60-1 bis(2-Chloro-1-methylethyl)ether
111-91-1 bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
111-44-4 bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether
117-81-7 bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
65794-96-9 m,p-Cresols
95-48-7 o-Cresol
1718-51--0 p-Terphenyl-d14
Product: MISSGAS_L Workdef ID: 1370067
Method: ASTM D 5057
Product Description: ASTM D 5057 Specific Gravity
Samples: 001,002,003,004,005,006,007
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS# Parmname
Specific Gravity
Product: RADALQT _L Workdef ID: 1371095
Method:
In Product Group? No
In Product Group? No
Product Description: Rad 2 Aliquot for distribution throughout the lab
~amples: 001, 002, 003, 004, 005, 006, 007
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS# Parmname
10 ug/L
10 ug/L
1 ug/L
10 ug/L
10 ug/L
1 ug/L
10 ug/L
10 ug/L
10 ug/L
10 ug/L
1 ug/L
10 ug/L
10 ug/L
10 ug/L
Group Name:
Client RDL or
PQL & Unit
.1 none
Group Name:
Client RDL or
PQL & Unit
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
Reporting
Units
none
Report Date: 30-SEP-20
Work Order:519405
Page 7 of 8
SURR y y
REG y y
IS y y
REG y y
IS y y
REG y y
SURR y y
REG y y
REG y y
REG y y
REG y y
REG y y
REG y y
REG y y
REG y y
SURR y y
Group Reference:
Path: Standard
Product Reference:
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
REG y y No
Group Reference:
Path: Standard
Product Reference:
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Reporting Parm Included Included Custom
Units Function in Sample? in QC? List?
0
...... ;;.. ~
V)
0 s:::t" 0-, ......
V)
0 Q
r:/J.
0-, ...... ......
4-t 0
~ ......
(l)
bl)
ell p.,
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
Product: VOA8260BL Workdef ID: 1508375 In Product Group? No
Method: SW846 82608
Product Description: SW846 82608 Volatiles
Samples: 001, 002, 003, 004, 005, 006, 007, 008
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS# Parmname
17060-07-0 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
3855-82-1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4
78-93-3 2-Butanone
67-64-1 Acetone
71-43-2 Benzene
460-00-4 Bromofluorobenzene
56-23-5 Carbon tetrachloride
3114-55-4 Chlorobenzene-d5
67-66-3 Chloroform
74-87-3 Chloromethane
462-06-6 Fluorobenzene
75-09-2 Methylene chloride
91-20-3 Naphthalene
109-99-9 Tetrahydrofuran
108-88-3 Toluene
2037-26-5 Toluene-dB
1330-20-7 Xylenes (total)
Action Product Name Description
Contingent
Tests
Login Requirements:
Requirement
Group Name:
Client RDL or Reporting
PQL & Unit Units
50 ug/L ug/L
ug/L
4000 ug/L
700 ug/L
5 ug/L
50 ug/L ug/L
5 ug/L
ug/L
70 ug/L
30 ug/L
ug/L
5 ug/L
100 ug/L
46 ug/L
1000 ug/L
50 ug/L ug/L
10000 ug/L
Samples
Include? Comments
Peer Review by: ___________ _ Work Order (SDG#), PO# Checked? ____ _
Report Date: 30-SEP-20
Work Order: 519405
Page 8 of 8
Group Reference:
Path: Unpreserved
Product Reference:
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
SURR y y No
IS y y
REG y y
REG y y
REG y y
SURR y y
REG y y
IS y y
REG y y
REG y y
IS y y
REG y y
REG y y
REG y y
REG y y
SURR y y
REG y y
...... :>
~
lr)
0 s:::I" °' ......
lr)
r_
Cl a)
°' ......
4-< 0
s:::I" ......
C of C signed in receiver location? ~
p..
List of current GEL Certifications as of 30 September 2020
State Certification
Alabama 42200
Alaska 17-018
Alaska Drinking Water SCOOOI2
Arkansas 88-0651
CLIA 42D0904046
California 2940
Colorado SC00012
Connecticut PH-0169
DoD ELAP/ ISO 17025 A2LA 2567.01
Florida NELAP E87156
Foreign Soils Permit P330-15-00283,P330-15-00253
Georgia SC00012
Georgia SDWA 967
Hawaii SC00012
Idaho SC00012
Illinois NELAP 200029
Indiana C-SC-01
Kansas NELAP E-I0332
Kentucky SDWA 90129
Kentucky Wastewater 90129
Louisiana Drinking Water LA024
Louisiana NELAP 03046 (AI33904)
Maine 2019020
Maryland 270
Massachusetts M-SC012
Massachusetts PF AS Approv Letter
Michigan 9976
Mississippi SC00012
Nebraska NE-OS-26-13
Nevada scooo 122020-1
New Hampshire NELAP 2054
New Jersey NELAP SC002
New Mexico SC00012
New York NELAP 11501
North Carolina 233
North Carolina SDWA 45709
North Dakota R-158
Oklahoma 2019-165
Pennsylvania NELAP 68-00485
Puerto Rico SC00012
S. Carolina Radiochem 10120002
Sanitation Districts ofL 9255651
South Carolina Chemistry 10120001
Tennessee TN 02934
TexasNELAP Tl04704235-20-17
UtahNELAP SC000122020-32
Vermont VT87156
Virginia NELAP 460202
Washington C780
Page 15 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GC/MS Volatile
Technical Case Narrative
Energy Fuels Resources
SDG #: 519405
Product: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) by Gas Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer
Analytical Method: SW846 8260B
Analytical Procedure: GL-OA-E-038 REV# 28
Analytic.al Batch: 2033589
The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s).
GEL Sample ID#
519405001
519405002
519405003
519405004
519405005
519405006
519405007
519405008
1204627897
1204627898
1204627899
1204627900
1204631025
1204631026
1204631037
1204631038
Client Sample ldentil1cation
Cell I
Cell 2 Slimes
Cell 4A
Cell 4A LDS
Cell 4B
Cell 4B LDS
Cell 65
Trip Blank
Method Blank (MB)
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
518889001 (NonSDG) Post Spike (PS)
5 l 888900l(NonSDG) Post Spike Duplicate (PSD)
Method Blank (MB)
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
Method Blank (MB)
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.
Data Summary:
All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and
procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where
applicable, with the following exceptions.
Technical Information
Sample Dilutions/Methanol Dilutions
Samples 519405002 (Cell 2 Slimes) and 519405004 (Cell 4A LDS) in this SDG were analyzed at a dilution. The
samples were not analyzed at a lower dilution. There were positive results for target analytes within the middle
to upper range of the calibration curve.
519405
Analyte
002 004
l,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 5X 5X
2-Butanone 5X 5X
Acetone 5X 5X
Benzene 5X 5X
Carbon tetrachloride 5X 5X
Chlorobenzene-d5 5X 5X
Page 16 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Chlorofonn 5X 5X
Chloromethane 5X 5X
Fluorobenzene 5X 5X
Methylene chloride 5X 5X
Naphthalene 5X 5X
Tetrahydrofuran 5X 5X
Toluene 5X 5X
Xylenes (total) 5X 5X
Sample Re-extraction/Re-analysis
Samples 519405001 (Cell l), 519405003 (Cell 4A), 519405005 (Cell 4B), 519405006 (Cell 4B LDS) and
5 l 9405007 (Cell 65) were re-analyzed and reported because they were over diluted in the initial analysis.
Certification Statement
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.
Page 17 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Qualifier Definition Report
for
DNMIOOl Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Client SDG: 519405 GEL Work Order: 519405
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
* * Analyte is a surrogate compound
U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
DL Indicates that sample is diluted.
RA Indicates that sample is re-analyzed without re-extraction.
RE Indicates that sample is re-extracted.
ReviewNalidation
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data reviewer. In addition, all CLP-like deliverables
receive a third level review of the fractional data package.
The following data validator verified the information presented in this data report:
Signature: ~ ti~ Name: Erin Haubert
Date: 15 SEP 2020 Title: Data Validator
Page 18 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summar:y Reoort Date: September 14, 2020 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Page 1 of
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Workorder: 519405
----Parmname NOM Saml!le C Units RPD% REC% __ Ran _e Anlst Date Time
Volatile-GC/MS
3atch 2033589
QC 120462 7898 LCS
2-Butanone 250 212 ug/L 85 (55%-141%) MXL2 08/25/20 09:3
Acetone 250 222 ug/L 89 (43%-164%)
Benzene 50.0 45.1 ug/L 90 (73%-120%)
Carbon tetrachloride 50.0 44.8 ug/L 90 (74%-145%)
Chloroform 50.0 46.8 ug/L 94 (76%-126%)
Chloromethane 50.0 41.1 ug/L 82 (62%-131%)
Methylene chloride 50.0 43.5 ug/L 87 (68%-123%)
Naphthalene 50.0 51.9 ug/L 104 (71%-132%)
Toluene 50.0 44.4 ug/L 89 (74%-120%)
Xylenes (total) 150 137 ug/L 91 (66%-128%)
l ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 50.0 47.7 ug/L 95 (71%-134%)
Bromofluorobenzene 50.0 47.3 ug/L 95 (70%-131%)
Toluene-d8 50.0 48.9 ug/L 98 (74%-124%)
Page 27 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GELLABORATO~ESLLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summarl:
Workorder: 519405 Page 2 of
Parmname NOM Sam C Units RPO% REC% Ran e Anlst Date Time
Volatile-GC/MS
3atch 2033589
QCI204631026 LCS
2-Butanone 250 236 ug/L 94 (55%-141%) MXL2 08/25/20 21 :2'
Acetone 250 239 ug/L 96 (43%-164%)
Benzene 50.0 51.4 ug/L 103 (73%-120%)
Carbon tetrachloride 50.0 51.0 ug/L 102 (74o/o-145%)
Chloroform 50.0 53.4 ug/L 107 (76%-126%)
Chloromethane 50.0 51.0 ug/L 102 (62%-131%)
Methylene chloride 50.0 50.9 ug/L 102 (68%-123%)
Naphthalene 50.0 55.2 ug/L 110 (71%-132%)
Toluene 50.0 50.9 ug/L 102 (74o/o-120%)
Xylenes (total) 150 156 ug/L 104 (66%-128%)
l ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 50.0 46.2 ug/L 92 (71%-134%)
Bromotluorobenzene 50.0 48.3 ug/L 97 (70%-131%)
Toluene-d8 50.0 48.5 ug/L 97 (74%-124%)
QCI204631038 LCS
2-Butanone 250 246 ug/L 99 (55%-141%) 08/26/20 08:4
Acetone 250 251 ug/L 100 (43%-164%)
Page 28 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GELLABORATO~ESLLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summar!
Workorder: 519405 Page 3 of ------Parmname ---NOM C Uf!ili__ RPO% REC% Ran e Anlst __ Date Time --
Volatile-GC/MS
3atch 2033589
Benzene 50.0 51.2 ug/L 102 (73%-120%) MXL2 08/26/20 08:4
Carbon tetrachloride 50.0 47.9 ug/L 96 (74%-145%)
Chloroform 50.0 51.9 ug/L 104 (76%-126%)
Chloromethane 50.0 55.3 ug/L 111 (62%-131%)
Methylene chloride 50.0 48.4 ug/L 97 (68%-123%)
Naphthalene 50.0 55.0 ug/L 110 (71%-132%)
Toluene 50.0 50.6 ug/L 101 (74%-120%)
Xylenes (total) 150 157 ug/L 104 (66%-128%)
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 50.0 48.0 ug/L 96 (71%-134%)
Bromofluorobenzene 50.0 49.0 ug/L 98 (70%-131%)
Toluene-d8 50.0 49.8 ug/L 100 (74%-124%)
QC1204627897 MB
2-Butanone u ND ug/L 08/25/20 11 :3·
Acetone u ND ug/L
Benzene u ND ug/L
Carbon tetrachloride u ND ug/L
Page 29 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www .gel.com
QC Summar,Y
Workorder: 519405 Page 4 of ------------Parmname NOM Sami:1le ual _Q(2_ Units RPD% REC% _R_ang!_ Anls_t __ Date Time ---
Volatile-GC/MS
3atch 2033589
Chlorofonn u ND ug/L MXL2 08/25/20 11 :3'
Chloromethane u ND ug/L
Methylene chloride u ND ug/L
Naphthalene u ND ug/L
Tetrahydrofuran u ND ug/L
Toluene u ND ug/L
Xylenes (total) u ND ug/L
l,2-Dichloroethane-d4 50.0 49.1 ug/L 98 (71%-134%)
Bromofluorobenzene 50.0 49.6 ug/L 99 (70%-131%)
Toluene-d8 50.0 49.7 ug/L 99 (74%-124%)
QC1204631025 MB
2-Butanone u ND ug/L 08/25/20 22:4
Acetone u ND ug/L
Benzene u ND ug/L
Carbon tetrachloride u ND ug/L
Chlorofonn u ND ug/L
Page 30 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Sun1mary
Workorder: 519405 Page 5 of ------------
Parmname NOM Units RPO% REC% Ran e Anlst Date Time --
Volatile-GC/MS
3atch 2033589
Chloromethane u ND ug/L MXL2 08/25/20 22:4
Methylene chloride u ND ug/L
Naphthalene u ND ug/L
Tetrahydrofuran u ND ug/L
Toluene u ND ug/L
Xylenes (total) u ND ug/L
1,2-D ichloroethane-d4 50.0 47.7 ug/L 95 (71%-134%)
Bromotluorobenzene 50.0 48.7 ug/L 97 (70%-131%)
Toluene-d8 50.0 49.8 ug/L 100 (74%-124%)
QC1204631037 MB
2-Butanone u ND ug/L 08/26/20 10:5,
Acetone u ND ug/L
Benzene u ND ug/L
Carbon tetrachloride u ND ug/L
Chloroform u ND ug/L
Chloromethane u ND ug/L
Page 31 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summar:y
Workorder: 519405 Page 6 of -------------Parm name NOM Sam le Qu!!__ __ QC Units RPD% REC% Range Anlst Date Time
Volatile-GC/MS
3atch 2033589
Methylene chloride u ND ug/L MXL2 08/26/20 10:5•
Naphthalene u ND ug/L
Tetrahydrofuran u ND ug/L
Toluene u ND ug/L
Xylenes (total) u ND ug/L
l ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 50.0 49.9 ug/L 100 (71%-134%)
Bromofluorobenzene 50.0 50.4 ug/L IOI (70%-131%)
Toluene-d8 50.0 50.6 ug/L 101 (74%-124%)
QC1204627899 518889001 PS
2-Butanone 250 u 4000 236 ug/L 94 (25%-143%) 08/25/20 19:4
Acetone 250 u 700 246 ug/L 98 (35%-148%)
Benzene 50.0 u 5.00 50.9 ug/L 102 (63%-124%)
Carbon tetrachloride 50.0 u 5.00 50.4 ug/L 101 (63%-146%)
Chloroform 50.0 u 70.0 53.3 ug/L 107 (66%-133%)
Chloromethane 50.0 u 30.0 54.6 ug/L 109 (50%-138%)
Methylene chloride 50.0 u 5.00 50.9 ug/L 102 (62%-129%)
Page 32 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summar!
Workorder: 519405 Page 7 of
Parmname NOM Sam Units RPD% REC% Ran e Anlst Date Time
Volatile-GC/MS
3atch 2033589
Naphthalene 50.0 u 100 54.4 ug/L 109 (57%-137%) MXL2 08/25/20 19:4
Toluene 50.0 u 1000 50.7 ug/L 101 (60%-122%)
Xylenes (total) 150 154 ug/L 103 (48%-137%)
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 50.0 48.3 47.2 ug/L 94 (71%-134%)
Bromofluorobenzene 50.0 47.3 48.1 ug/L 96 (70%-131%)
Toluene-d8 50.0 49.0 49.3 ug/L 99 (74%-124%)
QC1204627900 51888900 I PSD
2-Butanone 250 u 4000 214 ug/L 9 86 (0%-20%) 08/25/20 20: I
Acetone 250 u 700 227 ug/L 8 91 (0%-20%)
Benzene 50.0 u 5.00 49.3 ug/L 3 99 (0%-20%)
Carbon tetrachloride 50.0 u 5.00 49.0 ug/L 3 98 (0%-20%)
Chloroform 50.0 u 70.0 51.3 ug/L 4 103 (0%-20%)
Ch loromethane 50.0 u 30.0 52.7 ug/L 4 105 (0%-20%)
Methylene chloride 50.0 u 5.00 48.1 ug/L 6 96 (0%-20%)
Naphthalene 50.0 u 100 55.5 ug/L 2 111 (Oo/o-20%)
Toluene 50.0 u 1000 49.l ug/L 3 98 (0%-20%)
Page 33 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summar:y
Workorder: 519405
Parmname NOM -~am le ual ~ Units RPD%
Volatile-GC/MS
3atch 2033589
Xylenes (total) 150
l,2-Dichloroethane-d4 50.0
Bromofluorobenzene 50.0
Toluene-d8 50.0
Notes:
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
**
<
>
Analyte is a surrogate compound
Result is less than value reported
Result is greater than value reported
The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product
151 ug/L
48.3 46.1 ug/L
47.3 48.7 ug/L
49.0 49.5 ug/L
A
B
C
D
E
F
H
For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank.
Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis
Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample
Organics--Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range
Estimated Value
Analytical holding time was exceeded
JNX Non Calibrated Compound
M Matrix Related Failure
2
REC%
100
92
97
99
Page 8 of
Rang_e Anlst Date Time
(0%-20%) MXL2 08/25/2020: 1
(71%-134%)
(70%-131%)
(74%-124%)
N Organic --Presumptive evidence based on mass spectral library search to make a tentative identification of the analyte (TIC). Quantitation is based
on nearest internal standard response factor
NIA RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.
NI See case narrative
ND Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit
NJ Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
P Organics--The concentrations between the primary and confirmation columns/detectors is >40% different. For HPLC, difference is also <70%
Q One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER.
R Sample results are rejected
U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
UJ Compound cannot be extracted
X Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
Page 34 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 519405 Page 9 of
----=N~O.=....c.cM-=--------=S~a=m=,Ple QuaJ__ ~ __ U-'--n--'-its-'---=R=P-"'D'--0'--'Vo'---_R_E_C_°!._o __ R_a_n~e __ A_n_ls_t __ D_a_t_e_T_im_e Parmnam~e ___ _
y
/\
h
QC Samples were not spiked with this compound
RPO of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.
Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded
NIA indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike cone. by a factor of 4 or more or %RPO not applicable.
"The Relative Percent Difference (RPO) obtained from the sample duplicate (OUP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater than
five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of+/-the
RL is used to evaluate the OUP result.
* Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.
For PS, PSO, and SOILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.
Page 35 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GC/MS Semivolatile
Technical Case Narrative
Energy Fuels Resources
SDG #: 519405
Product: Analysis of Semivolatile Organic Compounds by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry
Analytical Method: SW846 3510C/8270D
Analytical Procedure: GL-OA-E-009 REV# 45
Analytical Batch: 2033648
Preparation Method: SW846 3510C
Preparation Procedure: GL-OA-E-013 REV# 34
Preparation Batch: 2033647
The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s).
GEL Sample ID#
519405001
519405002
519405003
519405004
519405005
519405006
519405007
1204628037
1204628038
1204628039
1204628040
Client Sample Identification
Cell I
Cell 2 Slimes
Cell 4A
Cell 4A LDS
Cell 4B
Cell 4B LDS
Cell 65
Method Blank (MB)
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
5 l 9544004(NonSDG) Matrix Spike (MS)
519544004(NonSDG) Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.
Data Summary:
All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and
procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where
applicable, with the following exceptions.
Mi cellaneous Information
Manual Integrations
Samples (See Below) required manual integration in order to properly identify one or more peaks and/or to
correctly position the baseline as set in the calibration standard injections.
Sample Analyte Value
1204628038 (LCS) 4-Nitrophenol Result 12.5ug/L
519405001 (Cell I) 2-F1uorophenol Result 533ug/L
Phenol-d5 Result 399ug/L
519405003 (Cell 4A) Phenol-d5 Result 298ug/L
519405005 (Cell 4B) 2-Fluorophenol Result 427ug/L
Page 36 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Phenol-d5 Result 338ug/L
519405007 (Cell 65) 2-Fluorophenol Result 400ug/L
Phenol-d5 Result 334ug/L
TIC Comment
TIC searches were performed on samples 519405001 (Cell 1), 519405002 (Cell 2 Slimes), 519405003 (Cell 4A),
519405004 (Cell 4A LDS), 519405005 (Cell 4B), 519405006 (Cell 4B LDS) and 519405007 (Cell 65) in this
SDG. The software searches the 30 most abundant unidentified peaks and searches a NIST library in order to try
and identify them. Peaks with quality matches above 80% are reported.
Certification Statement
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.
Page 37 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Qualifier Definition Report
for
DNMI001 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Client SDG: 519405 GEL Work Order: 519405
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria ** Analyte is a surrogate compound
U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
DL Indicates that sample is diluted.
RA Indicates that sample is re-analyzed without re-extraction.
RE Indicates that sample is re-extracted.
ReviewNalidation
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data reviewer. In addition, all CLP-like deliverables
receive a third level review of the fractional data package.
The following data validator verified the information presented in this data report:
Signature: ~~
Date: 29 SEP 2020
Page 38 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Name: Barbara Bailey
Title: Data Validator
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summar1: Revort Date: September 29, 2020 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Page I of 2
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Workorder: 519405
Parmname NOM C Units RPO% REC% Ran~ Anlst Date Time
,emi-Volatile-GC/MS
3atch 2033648
QC1204628038 LCS
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 50.0 34.6 ug/L 69 (39%-94%) AGS1 08/26/20 22:2
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 50.0 31.9 ug/L 64 (37%-94%)
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine 50.0 35.7 ug/L 71 (51%-108%)
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 50.0 30.1 ug/L 60 (35%-90%)
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 50.0 29.9 ug/L 60 (35%-91%)
1-Methylnaphthalene 50.0 40.0 ug/L 80 (45%-100%)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 50.0 41.4 ug/L 83 (58%-115%)
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 50.0 39.0 ug/L 78 (53%-111%)
2,4-Dichlorophenol 50.0 38.8 ug/L 78 (56%-112%)
2,4-Dimethylphenol 50.0 33.3 ug/L 67 (44%-99%)
2,4-Dinitrophenol 50.0 28.7 ug/L 57 (30%-126%)
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 50.0 50.3 ug/L 101 (54%-119%)
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 50.0 46.2 ug/L 92 (55%-118%)
Page 66 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summarr
Workorder: 519405 Page 2 of 2
Parmname NOM Samp_!! Qual C Units RPO% REC% Range Anlst Date Time ---
,em i-Volatile-GC/MS
3atch 2033648
2-Ch1oronaphthalene 50.0 35.5 ug/L 71 (43%-103%) AGSl 08/26/20 22:2
2-Chlorophenol 50.0 34.2 ug/L 68 (51%-101%)
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol 50.0 37.5 ug/L 75 (43%-127%)
2-Methylnaphthalene 50.0 38.4 ug/L 77 (43%-97%)
2-Nitrophenol 50.0 38.2 ug/L 76 (54%-105%)
4-Bromopheny lpheny tether 50.0 43.0 ug/L 86 (52%-106%)
4-Ch1oro-3-methylphenol 50.0 42.5 ug/L 85 (55%-107%)
4-Ch1oropheny lpheny !ether 50.0 41.7 ug/L 83 (56%-115%)
4-Nitrophenol 50.0 12.5 ug/L 25 (21%-110%)
Acenaphthene 50.0 38.0 ug/L 76 (52%-103%)
Acenaphthy Jene 50.0 38.1 ug/L 76 (51%-101%)
Anthracene 50.0 40.8 ug/L 82 (54%-107%)
Benzi dine 100 50.8 ug/L 51 (16%-139%)
Benzo(a)anthracene 50.0 42.8 ug/L 86 (56%-107%)
Benzo( a)pyrene 50.0 45.1 ug/L 90 (47%-110%)
Page 67 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 519405 Page 3 of 2
Parmname NOM Sam le Qual QC Units RPD% REC% Rane Anlst Date Time
,em i-Volatile-GC/MS
3atch 2033648
Benzo(b )fluoranthene 50.0 43.2 ug/L 86 (52%-106%) AGSl 08/26/20 22:2
Benzo(ghi)pery Jene 50.0 37.4 ug/L 75 (38%-126%)
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 50.0 41.8 ug/L 84 (48%-115%)
Buty lbenzy lphthalate 50.0 49.4 ug/L 99 (50%-118%)
Chrysene 50.0 40.5 ug/L 81 (57%-112%)
Di-n-buty lphthalate 50.0 49.8 ug/L 100 (56%-120%)
Di-n-octylphthalate 50.0 41.9 ug/L 84 (44%-124%)
Dibenzo( a,h )anthracene 50.0 39.9 ug/L 80 (47%-119%)
Diethylphthalate 50.0 49.5 ug/L 99 (59%-113%)
Dimethylphthalate 50.0 46.8 ug/L 94 (61%-118%)
Diphenylamine 50.0 39.0 ug/L 78 (51%-107%)
Fluoranthene 50.0 47.4 ug/L 95 (52%-112%)
Fluorene 50.0 41.4 ug/L 83 (54%-101%)
Hexachlorobenzene 50.0 44.1 ug/L 88 (52%-108%)
Hexachlorobutadiene 50.0 33.4 ug/L 67 (33%-91%)
Page 68 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 519405 Page 4 of 2
Parmname NOM Sample Qual _QC Units RPO% REC% Ran .e Anlst Date Time
,emi-Volatile-GC/MS
3atch 2033648
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 50.0 19.5 ug/L 39 (22%-85%) AGS I 08/26/20 22:2
Hexachloroethane 50.0 27.3 ug/L 55 (33%-91%)
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene 50.0 38.2 ug/L 76 (40%-117%)
Isophorone 50.0 41.6 ug/L 83 (50%-110%)
N-Methyl-N-nitrosomethylamine 50.0 24.1 ug/L 48 (28%-78%)
N-Nitrosodipropylamine 50.0 38.8 ug/L 78 (54%-110%)
Naphthalene 50.0 34.4 ug/L 69 (44%-98%)
Nitro benzene 50.0 35.9 ug/L 72 (51%-110%)
Pentachlorophenol 50.0 34.7 ug/L 69 (48%-121%)
Phenanthrene 50.0 41.5 ug/L 83 (55%-102%)
Phenol 50.0 17.4 ug/L 35 (12%-90%)
Pyrene 50.0 45.7 ug/L 91 (45%-126%)
Pyridine 50.0 21.0 ug/L 42 (25%-81%)
bis(2-Chloro-l-methylethyl)ether 50.0 34.5 ug/L 69 (45%-113%)
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 50.0 35.2 ug/L 70 (50%-110%)
Page 69 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 519405 Page 5 of 2
Parmname NOM Sample C Units RPO% REC% Ran e Anlst Date Time
~emi-Volatile-GC/MS
3atch 2033648
bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether 50.0 33.4 ug/L 67 (52%-109%) AGSl 08/26/20 22:2
bis(2-Ethy lhexyl)phthalate 50.0 44.2 ug/L 88 (46%-121%)
m,p-Cresols 50.0 31.0 ug/L 62 (42%-96%)
o-Cresol 50.0 32.0 ug/L 64 (44%-97%)
2,4,6-Tribromophenol 100 99.5 ug/L 100 (32%-122%)
2-Fluorobiphenyl 50.0 36.8 ug/L 74 (31%-107%)
2-Fluorophenol 100 45.6 ug/L 46 (15%-88%)
Nitrobenzene-d5 50.0 36.5 ug/L 73 (35%-113%)
Phenol-d5 100 39.1 ug/L 39 (15%-91%)
p-Terphenyl-d14 50.0 48.5 ug/L 97 (35%-134%)
QC1204628037 MB
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene u ND ug/L 08/26/20 21:5
1,2-Dichlorobenzene u ND ug/L
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine u ND ug/L
1,3-Dichlorobenzene u ND ug/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene u ND ug/L
Page 70 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 519405 Page 6 of 2
Parmname NOM Sam C Units RPO% REC% Rane Anlst Date Time
,emi-Volatile-GC/MS
3atch 2033648
1-Methylnaphthalene u ND ug/L AGSI 08/26/20 21:5
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol u ND ug/L
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol u ND ug/L
2,4-Dichlorophenol u ND ug/L
2,4-Dimethylphenol u ND ug/L
2,4-Dinitrophenol u ND ug/L
2,4-Dinitrotoluene u ND ug/L
2,6-Dinitrotoluene u ND ug/L
2-Chloronaphthalene u ND ug/L
2-Chlorophenol u ND ug/L
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol u ND ug/L
2-Methy !naphthalene u ND ug/L
2-Nitrophenol u ND ug/L
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine u ND ug/L
4-Bromophenylphenylether u ND ug/L
Page 71 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 519405 Page 7 of 2
Parmname NOM Sample QuaJ QC Units RPD% REC% Rane Anlst Date Time
~emi-Volatile-GC/MS
3atch 2033648
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol u ND ug/L AGSI 08/26/2021 :5
4-Chlorophenylphenylether u ND ug/L
4-Nitrophenol u ND ug/L
Acenaphthene u ND ug/L
Acenaphthylene u ND ug/L
Anthracene u ND ug/L
Benzidine u ND ug/L
Benzo(a)anthracene u ND ug/L
Benzo( a)pyrene u ND ug/L
Benzo(b )fluoranthene u ND ug/L
Benzo(ghi)pery Jene u ND ug/L
Benzo(k)fluoranthene u ND ug/L
Buty lbenzy lphthalate u ND ug/L
Chrysene u ND ug/L
Di-n-butylphthalate u ND ug/L
Page 72 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summar1:
Workorder: 519405 Page 8 of 2
Parmname NOM SamP.!_e Qual C Units RPO% REC% ---1!!!!ge_ Anlst Date Time
~emi-Volatile-GC/MS
3atch 2033648
Di-n-octylphthalate u ND ug/L AGSI 08/26/2021 :5
Dibenzo( a,h )anthracene u ND ug/L
Diethylphthalate u ND ug/L
Dimethylphthalate u ND ug/L
Diphenylamine u ND ug/L
Fluoranthene u ND ug/L
Fluorene u ND ug/L
Hexachlorobenzene u ND ug/L
Hexachlorobutadiene u ND ug/L
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene u ND ug/L
Hexachloroethane u ND ug/L
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene u ND ug/L
Isophorone u ND ug/L
N-Methyl-N-nitrosomethylamine u ND ug/L
N-Nitrosodipropylamine u ND ug/L
Page 73 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 519405 Page 9 of 2
Parmname NOM Sam C Units RPD% REC% Ran e Anlst Date Time
,em i-Volatile-GC/MS
3atch 2033648
Naphthalene u ND ug/L AGSl 08/26/20 21 :5
Nitro benzene u ND ug/L
Pentachlorophenol u ND ug/L
Phenanthrene u ND ug/L
Phenol u ND ug/L
Pyrene u ND ug/L
Pyridine u ND ug/L
bis(2-Chloro-l-methylethyl)ether u ND ug/L
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane u ND ug/L
bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether u ND ug/L
bis(2-Ethy lhexy I )phthalate u ND ug/L
m,p-Cresols u ND ug/L
o-Cresol u ND ug/L
2,4,6-Tribromophenol 100 97.8 ug/L 98 (32%-122%)
2-Fluorobiphenyl 50.0 36.9 ug/L 74 (31%-107%)
Page 74 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summar:y
Workorder: 519405 Page 10 of 2
Parmname NOM SamJ!le Qual C Units RPO% REC% Rane Anlst Date Time
,emi-Volatile-GC/MS
3atch 2033648
2-Fluorophenol 100 40.9 ug/L 41 (15%-88%) AGSI 08/26/2021 :5
Nitrobenzene-d5 50.0 37.6 ug/L 75 (35%-113%)
Phenol-d5 100 28.4 ug/L 28 (15%-91%)
p-Terphenyl-d14 50.0 47.6 ug/L 95 (35%-134%)
QCI204628039 519544004 MS
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 100 u 20.0 74.7 ug/L 75 (32%-87%) 08/27/20 02:4
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 100 u 20.0 73.1 ug/L 73 (29%-90%)
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine 100 u 20.0 73.2 ug/L 73 (38%-113%)
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 100 u 20.0 68.7 ug/L 69 (31%-82%)
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 100 u 20.0 68.4 ug/L 68 (31%-84%)
1-Methylnaphthalene 100 u 2.00 85.9 ug/L 86 (31%-99%)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 100 u 20.0 86.6 ug/L 87 (37%-114%)
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 100 u 20.0 83.9 ug/L 84 (38%-113%)
2,4-Dichlorophenol 100 u 20.0 87.8 ug/L 88 (40%-109%)
2,4-Dimethylphenol 100 u 20.0 75.6 ug/L 76 (35%-100%)
2,4-Dinitrophenol 100 u 40.0 61.9 ug/L 62 (20%-131%)
Page 75 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summarl:
Workorder: 519405 Page 11 of 2 -Parmname NOM Units RPO% REC% Date Time
,emi-Volatile-GC/MS
3atch 2033648
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 100 u 20.0 104 ug/L 104 (43%-116%) AGS1 08/27/20 02:4
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 100 u 20.0 95.5 ug/L 96 (43%-112%)
2-Chloronaphthalene 100 u 2.00 74.3 ug/L 74 (34%-105%)
2-Chlorophenol 100 u 20.0 83.2 ug/L 83 (37%-104%)
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol 100 u 20.0 71.9 ug/L 72 (30%-128%)
2-Methylnaphthalene 100 u 2.00 82.9 ug/L 83 (30%-101%)
2-N itrophenol 100 u 20.0 91.4 ug/L 91 (38%-113%)
4-Bromophenylphenylether 100 u 20.0 87.l ug/L 87 (39%-116%)
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 100 u 20.0 92.8 ug/L 93 (38%-115%)
4-Chloropheny lpheny ]ether 100 u 20.0 86.4 ug/L 86 (41%-116%)
4-Nitrophenol 100 u 20.0 38.8 ug/L 39 (16%-83%)
Acenaphthene 100 u 2.00 79.1 ug/L 79 (39%-112%)
Acenaphthylene 100 u 2.00 80.6 ug/L 81 (37%-111%)
Anthracene 100 u 2.00 82.7 ug/L 83 (39%-112%)
Benzo( a)anthracene 100 u 2.00 86.3 ug/L 86 (42%-114%)
Page 76 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GELLABORATOruESLLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summarr
Workorder: 519405 Page 12 of 2 -----Parmname NOM Sam ual Units RPO% REC% Ran e Anlst Date Time
~emi-Volatile-GC/MS
3atch 2033648
Benzo(a)pyrene 100 u 2.00 92.2 ug/L 92 (41%-109%) AGSI 08/27/20 02:4
Benzo(b )fl uoranthene 100 u 2.00 88.6 ug/L 89 (41%-109%)
Benzo(ghi)perylene 100 u 2.00 71.8 ug/L 72 (31%-118%)
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 100 u 2.00 85.7 ug/L 86 (41%-113%)
Buty lbenzy lphthalate 100 u 20.0 98.7 ug/L 99 (40%-121%)
Cbrysene JOO u 2.00 81.3 ug/L 81 (42%-118%)
Di-n-butylphthalate 100 u 20.0 102 ug/L 102 (44%-119%)
Di-n-octy lphthalate 100 u 20.0 91.5 ug/L 92 (31%-129%)
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 100 u 2.00 77.8 ug/L 78 (33%-122%)
Diethylphthalate 100 u 20.0 102 ug/L 102 (46%-117%)
Dimethylphthalate JOO u 20.0 96.4 ug/L 96 (45%-123%)
Diphenylamine 100 u 20.0 72.4 ug/L 72 (37%-109%)
Fluoranthene 100 u 2.00 95.0 ug/L 95 (42%-113%)
Fluorene 100 u 2.00 86.0 ug/L 86 (39%-108%)
Hexachlorobenzene 100 u 20.0 90.2 ug/L 90 (40%-111%)
Page 77 of 119 SDG: 519405 Rev 1
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summarr
Workorder: 519405 Page 13 of 2
Parmname NOM Sam~le ual C Units RPO% REC% Ran e Anlst Date Time
,emi-Volatile-GC/MS
3atch 2033648
Hexachlorobutadiene 100 u 20.0 70.0 ug/L 70 (24%-92%) AGS1 08/27/20 02:4
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 100 u 20.0 32.3 ug/L 32 (19%-77%)
Hexachloroethane 100 u 20.0 61.3 ug/L 61 (29%-88%)
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene 100 u 2.00 74.1 ug/L 74 (34%-121%)
Isophorone 100 u 20.0 91.0 ug/L 91 (38%-110%)
N-Methyl-N-nitrosomethylamine 100 u 20.0 67.6 ug/L 68 (24%-96%)
N-N itrosodipropy Iamine 100 u 20.0 90.3 ug/L 90 (38%-119%)
Naphthalene 100 u 2.00 77.3 ug/L 77 (32%-98%)
Nitrobenzene 100 u 20.0 84.3 ug/L 84 (37%-115%)
Pentachlorophenol 100 u 20.0 64.5 ug/L 65 (33%-130%)
Phenanthrene 100 u 2.00 84.3 ug/L 84 ( 41o/o-108%)
Phenol 100 u 20.0 52.9 ug/L 53 (19%-78%)
Pyrene 100 u 2.00 87.0 ug/L 87 (33%-121%)
Pyridine 100 u 20.0 60.3 ug/L 60 (22%-88%)
bis(2-Chloro-l-methy lethyl)ether 100 u 20.0 84.0 ug/L 84 (35%-121%)
Page 78 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summan::
Workorder: 519405 Page 14 of 2
Parm name NOM SI!!!! le C Units RPO% REC% Ran~e Anlst Date Time
~em i-Volatile-GC/MS
3atch 2033648
bis(2-Chloroethoxy )methane 100 u 20.0 79.2 ug/L 79 (41%-110%) AGSI 08/27/20 02 :4
bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether 100 u 20.0 81.7 ug/L 82 (41%-112%)
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 100 u 2.00 92.2 ug/L 92 (33%-126%)
m,p-Cresols JOO u 20.0 77.8 ug/L 78 (30%-113%)
o-Cresol 100 u 20.0 79.2 ug/L 79 (32%-102%)
2,4,6-Tribromophenol 200 78.5 202 ug/L IOI (32%-122%)
2-Fluorobiphenyl JOO 32.3 77.9 ug/L 78 (31%-107%)
2-Fluorophenol 200 36.5 125 ug/L 62 (15%-88%)
Nitrobenzene-d5 100 35.2 87.0 ug/L 87 (35%-113%)
Phenol-d5 200 24.8 109 ug/L 55 (15%-91%)
p-Terpheny 1-d 14 100 45.2 96.4 ug/L 96 (35%-134%)
QC1204628040 519544004 MSD
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 100 u 20.0 75.9 ug/L 2 76 (Oo/o-30%) 08/27/20 03:0·
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 100 u 20.0 72.2 ug/L 72 (0%-30%)
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine 100 u 20.0 80.7 ug/L IO 81 (0%-30%)
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 100 u 20.0 67.6 ug/L 2 68 (Oo/o-30%)
Page 79 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 519405 Page 15 of 2
Parmname NOM Sample Qual C Units RPD% REC% Ran e Anlst Date Time
,emi-Volatile-GC/MS
3atch 2033648
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 100 u 20.0 68.2 ug/L 0 68 (0%-30%) AGSI 08/27/20 03:0'
1-Methylnaphthalene 100 u 2.00 85.8 ug/L 0 86 (0%-30%)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 100 u 20.0 86.4 ug/L 0 86 (0%-30%)
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 100 u 20.0 85.9 ug/L 2 86 (0%-30%)
2,4-Dichlorophenol 100 u 20.0 89.7 ug/L 2 90 (0%-30%)
2,4-Dimethylphenol 100 u 20.0 78.7 ug/L 4 79 (Oo/o-30%)
2,4-Dinitrophenol 100 u 40.0 57.0 ug/L 8 57 (0%-30%)
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 100 u 20.0 94.7 ug/L 9 95 (0%-30%)
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 100 u 20.0 92.6 ug/L 3 93 (0%-30%)
2-Chloronaphthalene 100 u 2.00 76.6 ug/L 3 77 (0%-30%)
2-Chlorophenol 100 u 20.0 83.3 ug/L 0 83 (Oo/o-30%)
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol 100 u 20.0 76.6 ug/L 6 77 (0%-30%)
2-Methylnaphthalene 100 u 2.00 83.5 ug/L 84 (Oo/o-30%)
2-Nitrophenol 100 u 20.0 92.9 ug/L 2 93 (0%-30%)
4-Bromophenylphenylether 100 u 20.0 92.8 ug/L 6 93 (Oo/o-30%)
Page 80 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 519405 Page 16 of 2
Parm name NOM Sa'!!ple Q!!_al C Units RPD% REC% Range Anlst Date Time
~emi-Volatile-GC/MS
3atch 2033648
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 100 u 20.0 92.2 ug/L 92 (0%-30%) AGS1 08/27/20 03:0·
4-Chlorophenylphenylether 100 u 20.0 82.4 ug/L 5 82 (0%-30%)
4-Nitrophenol 100 u 20.0 31.l ug/L 22 31 (0%-30%)
Acenaphthene 100 u 2.00 79.2 ug/L 0 79 (0%-30%)
Acenaphthy Jene 100 u 2.00 81.1 ug/L 81 (0%-30%)
Anthracene 100 u 2.00 84.7 ug/L 2 85 (0%-30%)
Benzi dine 200 u 20.0 121 ug/L 26 60 (0%-30%)
Benzo( a )anthracene 100 u 2.00 87.4 ug/L 87 (0%-30%)
Benzo(a)pyrene 100 u 2.00 94.9 ug/L 3 95 (0%-30%)
Benzo(b )fluoranthene 100 u 2.00 90.l ug/L 2 90 (0%-30%)
Benzo(ghi)pery Jene 100 u 2.00 78.7 ug/L 9 79 (0%-30%)
Benzo(k)tluoranthene 100 u 2.00 87.3 ug/L 2 87 (0%-30%)
Buty lbenzylphthalate 100 u 20.0 93.5 ug/L 5 94 (0%-30%)
Chrysene 100 u 2.00 84.6 ug/L 4 85 (0%-30%)
Di-n-butylphthalate 100 u 20.0 98.3 ug/L 4 98 (0%-30%)
Page 81 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summar!
Workorder: 519405 Page 17 of 2
Parmname NOM Sam le C Units RPO% REC% Ran e Anlst Date Time --
,emi-Volatile-GC/MS
3atch 2033648
Di-n-octy lphthalate 100 u 20.0 93.2 ug/L 2 93 (0%-30%) AGS1 08/27/20 03:0·
Dibenzo( a,h)anthracene 100 u 2.00 83.2 ug/L 7 83 (0%-30%)
Diethylphthalate 100 u 20.0 95.7 ug/L 6 96 (0%-30%)
Dimethylphthalate 100 u 20.0 95.0 ug/L 95 (0%-30%)
Diphenylamine 100 u 20.0 84.0 ug/L 15 84 (0%-30%)
Fluoranthene 100 u 2.00 91.5 ug/L 4 91 (0%-30%)
Fluorene 100 u 2.00 82.2 ug/L 4 82 (0%-30%)
Hexachlorobenzene 100 u 20.0 95.9 ug/L 6 96 (0%-30%)
Hexachlorobutadiene 100 u 20.0 71.1 ug/L 71 (0%-30%)
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 100 u 20.0 34.7 ug/L 7 35 (0%-30%)
Hexachloroethane 100 u 20.0 60.0 ug/L 2 60 (0%-30%)
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene 100 u 2.00 80.7 ug/L 9 81 (Oo/o-30%)
Isophorone 100 u 20.0 93.5 ug/L 3 94 (Oo/o-30%)
N-Methyl-N-nitrosomethylamine 100 u 20.0 65.8 ug/L 3 66 (0%-30%)
N-Nitrosodipropylamine 100 u 20.0 90.4 ug/L 0 90 (0%-30%)
Page 82 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summar:y
Workorder: 519405 Page 18 of 2
Parmname NOM Q_C Units RPO% REC% Rane Anlst Date Time
,emi-Volatile-GC/MS
3atch 2033648
Naphthalene 100 u 2.00 79.l ug/L 2 79 (0%-30%) AGSI 08/27/20 03:0'
Nitro benzene 100 u 20.0 86.3 ug/L 2 86 (0%-30%)
Pentachlorophenol 100 u 20.0 65.8 ug/L 2 66 (0%-30%)
Phenanthrene 100 u 2.00 86.4 ug/L 2 86 (0%-30%)
Phenol 100 u 20.0 51.0 ug/L 4 51 (0%-30%)
Pyrene 100 u 2.00 81.4 ug/L 7 81 (0%-30%)
Pyridine 100 u 20.0 60.7 ug/L 61 (0%-30%)
bis(2-Chloro-1-methylethyl)ether 100 u 20.0 83.2 ug/L 83 (0%-30%)
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 100 u 20.0 81.3 ug/L 3 81 (0%-30%)
bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether 100 u 20.0 81.9 ug/L 0 82 (0%-30%)
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 100 u 2.00 86.9 ug/L 6 87 (0%-30%)
m,p-Cresols 100 u 20.0 77.7 ug/L 0 78 (Oo/o-30%)
o-Cresol 100 u 20.0 79.5 ug/L 0 79 (Oo/o-30%)
2,4,6-Tribromophenol 200 78.5 181 ug/L 91 (32%-122%)
2-Fluorobiphenyl 100 32.3 81.1 ug/L 81 (31%-107%)
Page 83 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Workorder: 519405
Parm name NOM ---
,emi-Volatile-GC/MS
3atch 2033648
2-FI uorophenol 200
Nitrobenzene-d5 100
Phenol-d5 200
p-Terphenyl-d14 100
Notes:
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
**
<
>
Analyte is a surrogate compound
Result is less than value reported
Result is greater than value reported
The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product
QC Summar!
Sam Units RPD%
36.5 120 ug/L
35.2 88.9 ug/L
24.8 107 ug/L
45.2 86.4 ug/L
A
B
C
D
E
F
H
For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank.
Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis
Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample
Organics--Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range
Estimated Value
Analytical holding time was exceeded
JNX Non Calibrated Compound
M Matrix Related Failure
REC%
60
89
53
86
Page 19 of 2
Ran e Anlst Date Time
(15%-88%) AGSI 08/27/20 03:0'
(35%-113%)
(15%-91%)
(35%-134%)
N Organics--Presumptive evidence based on mass spectral library search to make a tentative identification of the analyte (TIC). Quantitation is based
on nearest internal standard response factor
NIA RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.
NI See case narrative
ND Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit
NJ Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
P Organics--The concentrations between the primary and confirmation columns/detectors is >40% different. For HPLC, difference is also <70%
Q One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER.
R Sample results are rejected
U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
UJ Compound cannot be extracted
X Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
Page 84 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 519405
i>armname NOM Sam le C Units RPD% REC% Ran e Anlst
y
I\
h
QC Samples were not spiked with this compound
RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.
Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded
Page 20 of 2
Date Time
NI A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike cone. by a factor of 4 or more or %RPD not applicable.
/\ The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater than
five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of+/-the
RL is used to evaluate the DUP result.
* Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.
For PS, PSD, and SDIL T results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.
Page 85 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Product: Specific Gravity
General Chemistry
Technical Case Narrative
Energy Fuels Resources
SDG #: 519405
Analytical Method: ASTM O 5057
Analytical Procedure: GL-GC-E-065 REV# 7
Analytical Batch: 2033728
The folJowing samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s).
GEL Sample ID#
519405001
519405002
519405003
519405004
519405005
519405006
519405007
Client Sample Identification
CelJ l
Cell 2 Slimes
Cell 4A
Cell 4A LOS
Cell 4B
Cell 4B LOS
Cell 65
The samples in this SOG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.
Data Summary:
There are no exceptions, anomalies or deviations from the specified methods. All sample data provided in this report
met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration, continuing
calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable.
Certification Statement
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.
Page 86 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Qualifier Definition Report
for
DNMI001 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Client SDG: 519405 GEL Work Order: 519405
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
** Analyte is a surrogate compound
ReviewNalidation
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data reviewer. In addition, all CLP-like deliverables
receive a third level review of the fractional data package.
The following data validator verified the information presented in this data report:
Signature:}~ M ~ Name: Kristen Mizzell
Date: 15 SEP 2020 Title: Team Leader
Page 87 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado
Ms. Kathy Weinel
QC Summary
Workorder: 519405
Parmname ____ N--'-O_M ___ ----'S-"a_mple _Qual Q_C Units RPD%
Notes:
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
**
<
>
A
B
C
D
E
F
H
M
Analyte is a surrogate compound
Result is less than value reported
Result is greater than value reported
The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product
For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank.
Analyte has been confirmed by GCIMS analysis
Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample
General Chemistry--Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range
Estimated Value
Analytical holding time was exceeded
Matrix Related Failure
NIA RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.
NI
ND
NJ
Q
R
u
X
y
z
See case narrative
Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER.
Sample results are rejected
Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
QC Samples were not spiked with this compound
Paint Filter Test--Particulates passed through the filter, however no free liquids were observed.
Reoort Date: September 15, 2020
REC% Ran e Anlst
I\
d
h
RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +I-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.
5-day BOD--The 2: I depletion requirement was not met for this sample
Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded
Page 1 of
Date Time
NIA indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike cone. by a factor of 4 or more or %RPD not applicable.
/\ The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater than
five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of +I-the
RL is used to evaluate the DUP result.
* Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.
For PS, PSD, and SDIL T results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.
Page 95 of 119 SDG: 519405 Rev 1
Product: Alphaspec Th, Liquid
Radiochemistry
Technical Case Narrative
Energy Fuels Resources
SDG #: 519405
Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, Th-01-RC Modified
Analytical Procedure: GL-RAD-A-038 REV# 18
Analytical Batch: 2033149
Composite Preparation Method: GL-RAD-A-026
Composite Preparation Procedure: GL-RAD-A-026 REV# 18
Composite Preparation Batch: 2032694
The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s).
GEL Sample ID#
519405001
519405002
519405003
519405004
519405005
519405006
519405007
1204626950
1204626951
1204626952
Client Sample Identification
Cell 1
Cell 2 Slimes
Cell 4A
Cell 4A LDS
Cell 4B
Cell 4B LDS
Cell 65
Method Blank (MB)
519405001(Cell l) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.
Data Summary:
All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and
procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where
applicable, with the following exceptions.
Quality Control (OC) Information
Duplication Criteria between QC Sample and Duplicate Sample
The Sample and the Duplicate, (See Below), did not meet the relative percent difference requirement; however,
they do meet the relative error ratio requirement with the value listed below.
Sample Analyte Value
1204626951 (Cell lDUP) Thorium-230 RPD 24* (0.00%-20.00%) RER 2.03 (0-3)
RDLMet
The blank (See Below) did not meet the detection limit due to keeping the blank volume consistent with the
other sample aliquots.
Sample Analyte Value
Page 96 of 119 SDG: 519405 Rev 1
1204626950 (MB) Thorium-228 Result-102 < MDA 553 > RDL 1 pCi/L
Thorium-230 Result 143 < MDA 606 > RDL 1 pCi/L
Thorium-232 Result -31.3 < MDA 460 > RDL l pCi/L
Samples (See Below) did not meet the detection limits due to the small sample aliquots used. The aliquots were
reduced due to the high activity of other isotopes and in attempt to minimize interference.
Sample Analyte Value
519405002 (Cell 2 Slimes) Thorium-228 Result 62.9 < MDA 529 > RDL 1 pCi/L
Thorium-232 Result 226 < MDA 460 > RDL 1 pCi/L
519405004 (Cell 4A LOS) Thorium-228 Result-27.1 < MDA 696 > RDL I pCi/L
Thorium-232 Result 317 < MDA 526 > RDL 1 pCi/L
519405007 (Cell 65) Thorium-228 Result 562 < MDA 707 > RDL 1 pCi/L
Technical Information
Recounts
Sample 1204626952 (LCS) was recounted due to high carrier/tracer yield. The recount is reported.
Miscellaneous Information
Manual Integration
Manual integrations of alpha spectroscopy spectra 1204626951 (Cell IDUP), 519405001 (Cell l), 519405005
(Cell 4B) and 519405006 (Cell 4B LOS) were performed to fully separate counts in Regions oflnterest which
would have been biased.
Product: U-233/234,U-235/236 and U-238
Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified
Analytical Procedure: GL-RAD-A-011 REV# 28
Analytical Batch: 2033150
Composite Preparation Method: GL-RAD-A-026
Composite Preparation Procedure: GL-RAD-A-026 REV# 18
Compo ite Preparation Batch: 2032694
The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s).
GEL Sample ID#
519405001
519405002
519405003
519405004
519405005
519405006
519405007
Client Sample lden1ification
Cell I
Cell 2 Slimes
Cell 4A
Cell 4A LOS
Cell 4B
Cell 4B LOS
Cell 65
Page 97 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
1204626953
1204626954
1204626955
Method Blank (MB)
51940500l(Cell l) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.
Data Summary:
All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and
procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where
applicable, with the following exceptions.
Quality Control (QC) Information
RDLMet
The blank (See Below) did not meet the detection limit due to keeping the blank volume consistent with the
other sample aliquots.
Sample Analyte Value
1204626953 (MB) Uranium-23 3/234 Result 177 < MDA 482 > RDL 1 pCi/L
Uranium-235/236 Result -14.9 < MDA 523 > RDL 1 pCi/L
Uranium-238 Result 3 I 9 < MDA 369 > RDL 1 pCi/L
Product: GFPC,Total Alpha Radium, Liquid
Analytical Method: EPA 903.0
Analytical Procedure: GL-RAD-A-010 REV# 20
Analytical Batch: 2033151
Composite Preparation Method: GL-RAD-A-026
Composite Preparation Procedure: GL-RAD-A-026 REV# 18
Composite Preparation Batch: 2032694
The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s).
GEL Sample ID#
519405001
519405002
519405003
519405004
519405005
519405006
519405007
1204626956
1204626957
1204626958
1204626959
1204626960
Client Sample Identification
Cell 1
Cell 2 Slimes
Cell 4A
Cell4A LDS
Cell 4B
Cell 4B LDS
Cell 65
Method Blank (MB)
519405002(Cell 2 Slimes) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
519405002(Cell 2 Slimes) Matrix Spike (MS)
5 l 9405002(Cell 2 Slimes) Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
Page 98 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.
Data Summary:
All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and
procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where
applicable, with the following exceptions.
Quality Control (QC) Information
RDLMet
The blank (See Below) did not meet the detection limit due to keeping the blank volume consistent with the
other sample aliquots.
Sample Analyte Value
1204626956 (MB) Gross Radium Alpha Result 26.4 < MDA 104 > RDL 1 pCi/L
Technical Information
Recounts
Samples were recounted to verify sample results. Recounts are reported.
Product: Lucas Cell, Ra226, liquid
Analytical Method: EPA 903.1 Modified
Analytical Procedure: GL-RAD-A-008 REV# 15
Analytical Batch: 2033152
Composite Preparation Method: GL-RAD-A-026
Composite Preparation Procedure: GL-RAD-A-026 REV# 18
Composite Preparation Batch: 2032694
The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s).
GEL Sample ID#
519405001
519405002
519405003
519405004
519405005
519405006
519405007
1204626961
1204626962
1204626963
1204626964
Client Sample Identification
Cell l
Cell 2 Slimes
Cell 4A
Cell4A LDS
Cell 4B
Cell 4B LDS
Cell 65
Method Blank (MB)
51940500l(Cell l) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
51940500l(Cell l) Matrix Spike (MS)
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.
Page 99 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Data Summary:
All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and
procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where
applicable, with the following exceptions.
Qualicy Control (QC} Information
RDLMet
The blank (See Below) did not meet the detection limit due to keeping the blank volume consistent with the
other sample aliquots.
Sample Analyte Value
1204626961 (MB) Radium-226 Result 4.96 < MDA 12.2 > RDL 1 pCi/L
Product: Laboratory Composite
Composite Preparation Method: GL-RAD-A-026
Composite Preparation Procedure: GL-RAD-A-026 REV# 18
Composite Preparation Batch: 2032694
The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s).
GEL Sample ID#
519405001
519405002
519405003
519405004
519405005
519405006
519405007
Client Sample Identification
Cell 1
Cell 2 Slimes
Cell 4A
Cell 4A LDS
Cell 4B
Cell4B LDS
Cell 65
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.
Data Summary:
There are no exceptions, anomalies or deviations from the specified methods. All sample data provided in this
report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration,
continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable.
Certification Statement
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.
Page 100 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Qualifier Definition Report
for
DNMI001 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Client SDG: 519405 GEL Work Order: 519405
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
** Analyte is a surrogate compound
U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
Review/Validation
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data reviewer. In addition, all CLP-like deliverables
receive a third level review of the fractional data package.
The following data validator verified the information presented in this data report:
Signature:
Date: 18 SEP 2020
Page 101 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
Name: Kate Gellatly
Title: Analyst I
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC SummarI Reoort Date: September 18, 2020 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Page 1 of
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Workorder: 519405
Parmname NOM Sam le Qual C Units RPO% REC% Rane Anlst Date Time
fligh Rad Testing
3atch 2033149
QC1204626951 519405001 DUP
Thorium-228 1090 1990 pCi/L 58.8 (0%-100%) JXB7 09/03/20 07:l
Uncertainty +/-263 +/-370
Thorium-230 l.03E+06 l .32E+06 pCi/L 24* (0%-20%)
Uncertainty +/-7530 +/-8980
Thorium-232 6670 7290 pCi/L 8.89 (Oo/o-20%)
Uncertainty +/-607 +/-677
QC1204626952 LCS
Thorium-228 20400 pCi/L 09/03/20 15 :3·
Uncertainty +/-1310
Thorium-230 3580 pCi/L (75%-125%)
Uncertainty +/-560
Thorium-232 19900 20500 pCi/L 103 (75%-125%)
Uncertainty +/-1300
QC1204626950 MB
Thorium-228 u -102 pCi/L 09/03/20 07:l
Uncertainty +/-101
Thorium-230 u 143 pCi/L
Uncertainty +/-171
Thorium-232 u -31.3 pCi/L
Uncertainty +/-95.3
3atch 2033150
QC1204626954 519405001 DUP
Uranium-233/234 68300 63200 pCi/L 7.79 (0%-20%) JXB7 09/02/20 11 :J
Uncertainty +/-2160 +/-1850
Uranium-235/236 4020 3490 pCi/L 13.9 (Oo/o-20%)
Uncertainty +/-589 +/-492
Uranium-238 64600 67100 pCi/L 3.72 (0%-20%)
Uncertainty +/-2100 +/-1910
Page 116 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summar1:
Workorder: 519405 Page 2 of
Parmname NOM Units RPD% REC% Rang~ Anlst Date Time
fligh Rad Testing
3atch 2033150
QCl204626955 LCS
Uranium-233/234 25100 pCi/L JXB7 09/02/20 11 :3
Uncertainty +/-1240
Uranium-235/236 1360 pCi/L
Uncertainty +/-330
Uranium-238 27300 26900 pCi/L 98.5 (75%-125%)
Uncertainty +/-1280
QC1204626953 MB
Uranium-233/234 u 177 pCi/L 09/02/20 11 :3
Uncertainty +/-151
Uranium-235/236 u -14.9 pCi/L
Uncertainty +/-114
Uranium-238 u 319 pCi/L
Uncertainty +/-162
3atch 2033151
QC1204626957 519405002 DUP
Gross Radium Alpha 1630 1940 pCi/L 17.5 (0%-20%) AXM6 09/10/20 07:3·
Uncertainty +/-132 +/-149
QC 1204626960 LCS
Gross Radium Alpha l.14E+05 l.12E+05 pCi/L 97.9 (75%-125%) 09/10/20 07:5
Uncertainty +/-1010
QC1204626956 MB
Gross Radium Alpha u 26.4 pCi/L 09/10/20 07:3'
Uncertainty +/-27.4
QC1204626958 519405002 MS
Gross Radium Alpha l.15E+05 1630 l.15E+05 pCi/L 98.6 (75%-125%) 09/10/20 07:3'
Uncertainty +/-132 +/-1120
QC1204626959 519405002 MSD
Gross Radium Alpha l.15E+05 1630 l.17E+05 pCi/L 1.82 100 (0%-20%) 09/10/20 07:3·
Uncertainty +/-132 +/-1120
3atch 2033152
QC 1204626962 519405001 DUP
Radium-226 801 8,11 pCi/L 4.86 (0%-20%) MXH8 09/10/20 09:3,
Uncertainty +/-29.1 +/-30.4
Page 117 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 519405
Parm name
fligh Rad Testing
3atch 2033152
QC1204626964
Radium-226
QC 1204626961
Radium-226
LCS
MB
QC1204626963 519405001 MS
Radium-226
Notes:
NOM Sam
1350
Uncertainty
u
Uncertainty
1350 801
Uncertainty +/-29.1
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (I-sigma).
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
**
<
>
Analyte is a surrogate compound
Result is less than value reported
Result is greater than value reported
The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product
Units
1330 pCi/L
+/-40.4
4.96 pCi/L
+/-3.58
2460 pCi/L
+/-59.2
RPO%
A
B
BD
C
D
F
H
K
L
M
M
For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank.
Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low
Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis
Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample
Estimated Value
Analytical holding time was exceeded
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actual value is expected to be lower.
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low. Actual value is expected to be higher.
M if above MDC and less than LLD
Matrix Related Failure
NIA RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.
NI See case narrative
ND Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit
NJ Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
Q One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER.
R Sample results are rejected
U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
UI Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification
UJ Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification
Page 118 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
REC% Range Anlst
Page 3 of
Date Time
98.6 (75%-125%) MXH8 09/10/20 09:3,
09/10/20 09:3,
123 (75%-125%) 09/10/20 09:3,
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 519405
Parmname NOM Units RPO% REC% Ran e Anlst
UL
X
y
/\
h
Not considered detected. The associated number is the reported concentration, which may be inaccurate due to a low bias.
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
QC Samples were not spiked with this compound
RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.
Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded
Page 4 of
Date Time
NIA indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike cone. by a factor of 4 or more or %RPD not applicable.
/\ The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater than
five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of+/-the
RL is used to evaluate the DUP result.
* Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.
For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.
Page 119 of 119 SDG: 519405 Revl
TabD
Chemical and Radiological Summary Tables
Cell I
Chemical and Radiological Characteristics
Constituent 1987 2003 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2018 2019 2020 Resample Resample
Majo,r Ions (mg/L)
Carbonate <5 <l ND ND <1 <I <1 <1 <l NS <l <l <1 <1 <1 NS <5 <5
Bicarbonate <5 NA ND ND <1 <I <l <1 <1 NS <1 <l <l <l <1 NS <5 <5
Calcium 630 307 483.8 604 635 711 577 426 768 NS 404 573 647 581 518 NS 720 618
Chloride 8000 6728 37340 9830 20700 7440 33800 78000 9900 NS 11600 25500 19200 19900 39300 NS 19800 40000
Fluoride <100 3005 31.72 0.3 0.4 28.4 69.2 62.9 4130 NS 2380 5880 2980 4290 5020 NS 3480 7460
Magnesium 7900 5988 21220 6550 16200 5410 14300 16000 4470 NS 5530 12400 9210 9380 20800 NS 9200 12300
Nitrogen-Ammonia 7800 3353 10628 5250 15200 8120 12900 9750 3900 NS 5700 5.4 7090 1040 9810 NS 10400 10600
Nitrogen-Nitrate <100 41.8 269.4 64.9 142 58 212 556 128 NS 53 192 124 152 328 NS 118 191
Potassium NA 647 5698 1880 4140 1840 4510 9750 6580 NS 3010 7330 1970 2700 4790 NS 2600 4580
Sodium 10000 8638 62600 13200 39000 16700 29500 41700 15900 NS 12200 32100 18900 23900 53500 NS 28000 62900
Sulfate 190000 63667 287600 118000 232000 107000 182000 158000 100000 NS 124000 204000 212000 165000 253000 NS 169000 222000
pH (s.u.) 0.70 1.88 0.80 1.53 1.15 2.73 2.23 1.90 2.74 NS 1.30 1.01 <1.00 <l.00 <l.00 NS 1.14 0.92
TDS 120000 94700 357400 131000 140000 130000 216000 342000 149000 NS 159000 334000 242000 231000 361000 NS 257000 422000
Conductivity (umhos/cm) NA NA NA NA 365000 110000 112000 136000 94200 NS 113000 131000 123000 57600 110000 NS 119000 81500
Metals (ug/L)
Arsenic 440000 121267 849000 271000 436000 74400 299000 25500 9800 NS 249000 377000 407000 391000 641000 NS 270000 599000
Beryllium 780 475 2262 500 410 338 1270 3180 415 NS 448 1290 1030 749 1510 NS 930 1330
Cadmium 6600 3990 29320 8790 9120 2940 13700 30700 2380 NS 3060 7710 6320 6730 14000 NS 5400 9070
Chromium 13000 6365 29940 6760 18700 5620 22700 12100 8350 NS 13200 19600 14000 15900 21100 NS 15000 25700
Cobalt 120000 NA 88240 23500 97500 16200 56000 53100 25500 NS 56500 82000 77200 91400 113000 NS 66000 51400
Copper 740000 196667 881000 360000 168000 125000 483000 885000 544000 NS 3420000 3560000 4730000 3440000 4550000 NS 1700000 2110000
Iron 3400000 2820000 13480000 3280000 2390000 3400000 8940000 840000 1420000 NS 2520000 6680000 5650000 2300000 12200000 NS 9100000 15400000
Lead <20000 3393 27420 11200 10600 9240 23600 17000 2810 NS 13500 16800 22500 23000 41000 NS 22000 42400
Manganese 140000 162500 990200 206000 723000 173000 735000 1560000 188000 NS 162000 515000 713000 510000 936000 NS 540000 833000
Mercury NA NA ND ND 7.61 7.2 61.4 117 6.16 NS 12.5 24.6 8.59 7.86 16.8 NS 3.7 14
Molybdenum 240000 50550 415600 106000 142000 35300 235000 434000 16800 NS 68800 127000 97100 128000 239000 NS 120000 247000
Nickel 370000 36950 40860 32000 156000 27500 43700 15000 39100 NS 129000 130000 170000 183000 167000 NS 110000 27100
Selenium <20000 1862 15420 13000 14800 5220 11600 8090 2690 NS 3970 7070 3950 5070 10700 NS 10000 16600
Silver <5000 NA 1559.2 449 558 155 1110 4310 329 NS 336 1390 1240 1240 2320 NS 790 1290
Thallium 45000 NA 407.8 165 387 193 560 13 63.3 NS 876 1130 754 155 442 NS <700 <50
Tin <5000 NA 6512 1240 2290 263 1500 <100 <100 NS <17000 <100 <17000 <17000 <17000 NS 540 1220
Uranium 105000 134517 788600 416000 578000 159000 838000 1450000 140000 NS 137000 363000 131000 102000 248000 NS 81000 200000
Vanadium 280000 348000 2208200 1200000 773000 752000 2500000 1940000 98200 NS 485000 1130000 746000 1520000 2440000 NS 1400000 2090000
Zinc 1300000 NA 642940 476000 229000 171000 398000 811000 228000 NS 229000 638000 448000 515000 948000 NS 550000 396000
Radiologies (pCi/L)
735000
Gross Alpha NA 1693331 29380 21900 16500 11300 3610 12600 32700 NS 331000 (8/4/2015) 420000 191000 550000 NS 326000 83800 73800
(5/28/2015)
Cell 1
Chemical and Radiological Characteristics
Constituent 1987 2003 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2018 2019 2020 Resample Resample
voes (ug:/L,)
Acetone 35 NA 66.5 110 710 260 80 310 41.1 NS <700 56 40.6 28 50.4 NS 28 32.6
Benzene <5 NA ND ND <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 NS <5.0 <1 <l <l <l NS <l <l
Carbon tetrachloride <5 NA ND ND <1 <l <l <1 <1 NS <5.0 <1 <1 <1 <l NS <l <l
Chloroform 8 NA 6.7 6.6 16 4.9 13 19 7.62 NS <70.0 5.54 <l 3.42 114 NS 7.5 2.84
Chloromethane NA NA ND 9.4 11 4.4 3.6 4 5 NS <30.0 1.93 <1 1.13 1.16 NS 2.3 1.49
MEK NA NA ND ND 120 65 <l 200 <20 NS <4000 <20 <20 <20 <20 NS 11 J 6.41
Methylene Chloride 11 NA ND ND 2 <l <I 2 <I NS <5.0 1.83 <I 1.09 2.41 NS <l <5
Naphlhalene <JOOOO NA <10 ND I. I 5.4 2 3 <1 NS <100 <I <L <I <I NS <1 <I
Tetrahydrofuran NA NA 150 <20 <100 <lO <500 2.9 <I NS <46.0 <I <I <l 4.93 NS <35 <5
Toluene <5 NA ND ND <I <I <I <l <I NS <1000 <1 <I <I <I NS <I <I
Xylenes <5 NA ND ND <I <I <I <I <l NS <10000 <I <I <I <I NS <I <3
svocs (ug(L)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <LO <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <IO <148 <8.04 <10 <30
L ,2-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <L0.8 <LO <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30
1,3-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <LO <10 <10.8 <lO <10 <10 <JO <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30
1,4-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <L0.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30
1-Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA <50 <LO <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3.0
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <lO <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <LO <30
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol NA NA NA NA <50 <IO <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30
2,4-Dichlorophenol NA NA NA NA <50 <JO <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30
2,4-Dimethylphenol NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <JO <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30
2,4-Dioitropheno.l NA NA NA NA <250 <20 <20 <20 <21.6 <20 <20 <20 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <50 <50
2,4-Dinitrotoluene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <lO <30
2,6-Dinitrotoluene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30
2-Chloronaphthaleue NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <4.1
2-Chlorophenol NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30
2-Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <IO <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3
2-MethylphenoJ NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <IO <30
2-Ni Lrophenol NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <lO <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30
3&4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA <22 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <IO <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <37
3 ,3-Dichlorobenzidi ne NA NA NA NA <100 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <50 <33
4,6-Dinitro-2-NA NA NA NA <250 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <50 <30 methylphenol
4-Bromophenyl phenyl NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <IO <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30 ether
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30 ether
4-Nitrophenol NA NA NA NA <250 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <IO <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <50 <30
Acenaphthene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <IO <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3
Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA <50 <IO <10 <10 <I0.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <IO <3
Anthracene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <IO <I0.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3
Azobenzenc NA NA NA NA <50 <IO <10 <IO <10.8 <10 <10 <IO <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30
Benz(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <IO <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3
Cell 1
Chemical and Radiological Characteristics
I :2013 2018 Constituent 1987 0003 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20i13 llesample 2014 201,5 2016 2017 :2018 Resample 2019 202.0
Benzidine NA NA NA NA <100 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 41 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <100 <39
Benzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3
Benzo(b )fluoranthene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3
Benzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3
Bis(2-chloroethoxy) NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3 methane
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30 ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) NA NA NA NA <50 27 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3 phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3
Chrysene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3
Dibenz(a,h)anthracenc NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3
l)iethyl phthalate NA NA NA NA 170 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3
l)imethyl phthalate NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3
l)i-n-butyl phthalate NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3
l)i-n-octyl phthalate NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3
Fluoranthene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3
Fluorene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3
Hexachlorobenzene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30
Hexachlorobutadiene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <30 <30
Hexachloro -NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30 cyclopentadiene
Hexachloroethane NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <30 <30
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3
Isophorone NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <35
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3
Nitrobenzene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30
N-Nitrosodimethylamine NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30
N-Nitrosodi-n-NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30 propylamine
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30
Pentachlorophenol NA NA NA NA <250 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <50 <30
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3
Phenol NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <30
Pyrene NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <10 <3
Pyridine NA NA NA NA <50 <10 <10 <10 <10.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <148 <8.04 <20 <30
1 Historic values reported for Gross Alpha from 1987 and 2003 are total gross alpha reported in pCi/L. All other gross alpha data are reported as Gross Alpha minus Rn & U.
Cell 2 Slimes Drain
Chemical and Radiological Characteristics
Constituents 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Major Ions (mg/L)
Carbonate ND ND <1 <l <l <l <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <5 <5
Bicarbonate ND ND <l <1 <1 <1 <1 <l <1 <1 <1 <l <5 <5
Calcium 572 528 508 496 474 462 465 322 524 402 477 538 480 513
Chloride 3700 3860 2750 3510 3110 3730 3270 3720 3850 4040 3820 4310 3870 4080
Fluoride 3.3 ND <0.1 2.4 2.1 1.32 161 130 204 48.4 110 116 105 130
Magnesium 4100 4030 3750 3790 3640 3760 3320 2780 3810 3570 3630 4470 3700 3800
Nitrogen-Ammonia 4020 3620 3240 3820 2940 3540 1880 3500 367 3800 500 5620 4420 7150
Nitrogen-Nitrate 30.9 20.3 38 126 38 27 47.2 35 1.06 12.7 13.7 12.1 33.0 21.6
Potassium 636 560 689 620 636 611 622 489 659 512 668 774 710 735
Sodium 4050 4600 4410 4770 4590 4380 3980 3130 4800 4690 4810 5290 4600 4620
Sulfate 60600 74000 72200 63700 64200 58300 83700 62200 57800 83900 58300 63300 67000 67000
pH (s.u.) 3.18 3.24 3.11 3.39 3.18 3 3.02 3.1 3.1 2.99 3.08 2.89 3.07 3.06
TDS 84300 74600 84100 79900 80200 83800 92200 87000 88200 93100 85900 99900 94300 89500
Conductivity (umhos/cm) NA NA 88700 60200 51400 52900 51100 54100 58800 44500 52600 58200 55700 53900
Metals (ug/L)
Arsenic 26900 19300 14200 23500 17800 19400 21000 19800 13300 16900 21100 19600 23000 18000
Beryllium 298 245 271 267 231 251 262 197 275 259 261 241 280 284
Cadmium 5500 5840 5510 6370 5580 5290 5780 6480 6260 6610 6790 6380 6500 5220
Chromium 2750 2450 2230 2510 2380 2350 2290 1630 1840 1630 2290 2100 2100 1860
Cobalt 46500 43800 38700 48200 42500 48700 44900 46700 46000 46100 50600 46900 54000 40800
Copper 106000 154000 170000 148000 132000 138000 137000 126000 143000 156000 148000 136000 160000 93900
Iron 2770000 3310000 3230000 2720000 2960000 2850000 2810000 2180000 3000000 3410000 3430000 3030000 3600000 2420000
Lead 566 528 403 586 501 619 515 638 268 484 593 589 590 400
Manganese 117000 130000 160000 144000 123000 141000 122000 98000 136000 149000 151000 137000 170000 133000
Mercury ND ND <0.5 <4 11.1 1.9 <0.5 <0.0020 <0.5 <2 .00 <2.00 <2.00 <0.2 0.058
Molybdenum 4080 3190 2240 4630 3510 3610 3650 4250 2010 3360 4060 3340 3200 2170
Nickel 123000 122000 108000 126000 111000 125000 108000 127000 120000 134000 133000 121000 140000 104000
Selenium 422 647 726 844 714 711 678 1020 631 615 683 635 1300 585
Silver ND ND <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <100 <20 <100 <100 <100 <50 6
Thallium 361 703 368 470 371 338 278 402 233 212 373 374 390 2190
Tin ND ND <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <17000 <100 <17000 <17000 <17000 <50 <50
Uranium 23000 29200 29900 30600 27100 33400 22800 26400 27200 27300 28600 25200 29000 18600
Vanadium 409000 463000 536000 469000 454000 475000 452000 497000 513000 497000 534000 516000 500000 345000
Zinc 767000 750000 582000 652000 574000 639000 631000 405000 702000 764000 760000 728000 850000 816000
Radiologies (pCi/L),
Gross Alpha 1290 1570 1580 1000 1230 1370 2270 6890 7210 5660 4570 7520 3790 1630 (2400)*
voes '(ug/L)
Acetone 550 410 570 460 690 600 384 <700 599 473 551 551 449 501
Benzene ND ND <l <l <l <l <l <5.0 <1 <1 <l <1 <1 <5
Carbon tetrachloride ND ND <1 <I <l <1 <I <5.0 <l <1 <l <1 <1 <5
Chloroform 20 17 16 15 20 16 21.4 <70.0 18.6 15 17.1 17.1 16 13.7
Chloromethane 1.8 ND 2.2 2.3 2 3 2.04 <30.0 <l <1 1.46 1.46 2.2 <5
Cell 2 Slimes Drain
Chemical and Radiological Characteristics
Constituents 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
MEK 65 ND 100 83 130 100 95.5 <4000 102 80.3 58.4 58.4 135 74.0
Methylene Chloride ND ND <1 <1 <l <l <l <5.0 <1 <l 1.02 1.02 0.49 J <25
Naphthalene 14 7.5 16 17 13 12 16.8 <100 16.2 11.9 10.1 10.1 13 7.65
Tetrahydrofuran 15 NA <100 <10 <10 3.2 3.98 <46.0 2.16 <l 2.88 2.88 <10 <25
Toluene 1.7 ND 2.6 2.6 3 2 3.23 <1000 3.74 2.94 3.20 3.20 2.4 <5
Xylenes 1.5 ND <l 2.2 <l 2 5.97 <10000 <l <l <1 <1 0.51 J <15
SVOCS (ug/J.,) -·
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30
1,2-Dichlorobenzene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30
1,3-Dichlorobenzene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30
1,4-Dichlorobenzene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30
1-Methylnaphthalene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 11 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 12 <3.0
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30
2,4-Dichlorophenol NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30
2,4-Dimethylphenol NA NA <51 <20 <20 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30
2,4-Dinitrophenol NA NA <11 <10 <10 <20 <20 <20 <20 <10 <10 <9.03 <50 <50
2,4-Dinitrotoluene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30
2,6-Dinitrotoluene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30
2-Chloronaphthalene NA NA <I 1 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <4.1
2-Chlorophenol NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30
2-Methylnaphthalene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 11 <10 11.1 <10 <9.03 11 <3
2-Methylphenol NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30
2-Nitrophenol NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30
3&4-Methylphenol NA NA <21 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <37
3,3, -Dichlorobenzidine NA NA <51 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <46 <33
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <50 <30
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether NA NA <51 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30
4-Nitrophenol NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <50 <30
Acenaphthene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3
Acenaphthylene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3
Anthracene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3
Azobenzene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30
Benz(a)anthracene NA NA <21 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3
Benzi dine NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <92 <39
Benzo(a)pyrene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3
Benzo(b )fluoranthene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3
Benzo(g,h ,i )pery lene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3
Benzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane NA NA <l l <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30
Cell 2 Slimes Drain
Chemical and Radiological Characteristics
Constituents 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 1.1 <3
Butyl benzyl phthalate NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3
Chrysene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3
Dibenz(a,h)amhracene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3
Diethyl phthalate NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3
Dimethyl phthalate NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 1.5 <3
Di-n-butyl phthalate NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3
Di-n-octyl phthalate NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3
Fluoranthene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3
Fluorene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3
Hexachlorobenzene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30
Hexachlorobutadiene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <28 <30
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30
Hexachloroethane NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <28 <30
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3
Isophorone NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <35
Naphthalene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 5.3 <3
Nitro benzene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30
N-Nitrosodimethylamine NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine NA NA <51 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30
Pentachloropheno I NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <50 <30
Phenanthrene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3
Phenol NA NA <11 10.7 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <30
Pyrene NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <10 <3
Pyridine NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.03 <18 <30
* Sample was reanalyzed due to comparability with the duplicate sample. The reanalysis data are in (parenthesis).
Ce112LDS
Chemical and Radiological Characteristics
Constituent 2009 2010 2011 20.12 2013 2014 -2015 2016 201~ 2018 .2019 2020
Major Ions (mglL)
Carbonate <1 <1
Bicarbonate 168 324
Calcium 711 615
Chloride 1750 1360
Fluoride 0.4 0.4
Magnesium 596 454
Nitrogen-Ammonia 32.6 0.7 Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not
Nitrogen-Nitrate 2.8 2.2 Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled
Potassium 22 13
Sodium 412 318
Sulfate 2700 1780
pH (s.u.) 6.6 7.36
TDS 6750 5310
Conductivily (umhos/cm) 11000 6500
Metals (ug/L)
Arsenic <5 <5
Beryllium <0.50 <0.50
Cadmium 33.4 1.1
Chromium <25 <25
Cobalt 314 <10
Copper 59 12
Iron 208 37
Lead <1.0 <1.0
Manganese 1810 395 Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Mercury <0.50 0.52 Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Molybdenum 21 13
Nickel 948 <20
Selenium 7.9 9.4
Silver <10 <10
Thallium 0.92 <0.50
Tin <100 <100
Uranium 83.8 79.6
Vanadium 22 <15
Zinc 4220 78
Ce112 LDS
Chemical and Radiological Characteristics
Constituent -2009 2010 2011 ~012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
~diologics (pCillb}
Gross Alpha 13.5 7.3 Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not
Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampl.ed Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled
voes {ug/L)
Acetone <20 <20
Benzene <1 <1
Carbon tetrachloride <1 <1
Chloroform <1 <1
Chloromethane <1 <1 Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not MEK <20 <20
Methylene Chloride <1 <1 Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled
Naphthalene <1 <1
Tetrahydrofuran <100 6.13
Toluene <1 <1
Xylenes <1 <1
SVOCS (ug/L)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene NA <10
1,2-Dichlorobenzene NA <10
1,3-Dichlorobenzene NA <10
1,4-Dichlorobenzene NA <10
1-Methylnaphthalene NA <10
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol NA <10
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol NA <10
2,4-Dichlorophenol NA <10
2,4-Dimethylphenol NA <10
2,4-Dinitrophenol NA <20 Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not 2,4-Dinit:rotoluene NA <10 Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled
2,6-Dinitrotoluene NA <10
2-Chloronaphthalene NA <10
2-Chlorophenol NA <10
2-Methy !naphthalene NA <10
2-Methylphenol NA <10
2-Nitrophenol NA <10
3&4-Methylphenol NA <10
3,3 '-Dichlorobenzidine NA <10
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol NA <10
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether NA <10
Cell 2 LOS
Chemical and Radiological Characteristics
C<mstituenf 200J) 2010 '2011 ,201'2 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 II 2020
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol NA <10
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether NA <10
4-Nitrophenol NA <10
Acenaphthene NA <10
Acenaphthylene NA <10
Anthracene NA <10
Azobenzene NA <10
Benz(a)anthracene NA <10
Benzi dine NA <10
Benzo(a)pyrene NA <10
Benzo(b )fluoranthene NA <10
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene NA <10
Benzo(k)fluoranthene NA <10
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane NA <10
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether NA <10
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether NA <10
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate NA <10
Butyl benzyl phthalate NA <10
Chrysene NA <10
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene NA <10
Diethyl phthalate NA <10 Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not
Dimethyl phthalate NA <10 Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled Sampled
Di-n-butyl phthalate NA <10
Di-n-octyl phthalate NA <10
Fluoranthene NA <10
Fluorene NA <10
Hexachlorobenzene NA <10
Hexachlorobutadiene NA <10
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene NA <10
Hexachloroethane NA <10
lndeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene NA <10
Isophorone NA <10
Naphthalene NA <10
Nitrobenzene NA <10
N-Nitrosodimethylamine NA <10
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine NA <10
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine NA <10
Pentachlorophenol NA <10
Phenanthrene NA <10
Phenol NA <10
Pyrene NA <10
Pyridine NA <10
Cell 3
em1ca an a 10 oeaca 1aracteristics Ch . I d R d. I . I Cl
2013 2018 2019 Constituent 1987 2003 (Avg) 2007 (Avg) 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ReSample 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 ReSample 2020
Major Ions (mg/L)
Carbonate NA <l ND ND <l <1 <1 <1 <1 NS <1 <1 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 NS <5
Bicarbonate <5 NA ND ND <l <1 <1 <l <l NS <1 <1 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 NS <5
Calcium 300 418 887 478 628 560 200 591 586 NS 294 713 148 526 498 NS 510
Chloride NA 2460 15965 15400 17200 3470 40400 8880 38400 NS 7200 22800 115000 2720 55200 NS 15000
Fluoride <100 667 42.8 1.4 0.6 54.8 64.1 2300 12400 NS 1330 5410 46500 189 7400 NS 1340
Magnesium 5400 3386 15767 13100 17100 2500 22100 5680 15400 NS 1910 12700 31000 84400 22000 NS 10000
Nitrogen-Ammonia 13900 1302 13867 9010 21600 2650 6470 6840 100 NS 3030 8.91 6270 88.5 9490 NS 9000 Not
Nitrogen-Nitrate <100 20 102 44 142 26 261 64 277 NS 59 .5 26.6 582 107 710 NS 925 Sampled-
Potassium NA 254 6657 4760 3820 782 2590 1190 2110 NS 386 1620 3120 133 1480 NS 630 Dry
Sodium 5900 3198 25583 22900 28600 5620 47900 6660 34400 NS 3630 23800 59800 2120 46900 NS 14000
Sulfate 180000 33400 173667 167000 214000 40400 197000 80000 440000 NS 37000 158000 834000 9970 208000 NS 96000
pH (s.u.) 0.82 2.28 1.6 1.79 1.4 2.18 1.27 2.4 1.05 NS 2.2 1.72 <1.00 3.63 1.32 NS 3.88
TDS 189000 51633 228500 193000 243000 56200 296000 120000 410000 NS 70100 238000 887000 17300 327000 NS 143000
Conductivity (umhos/cm) NA NA NA NA 304000 59800 86400 80300 84300 NS 56200 121000 13600 20300 104000 NS 95500
Metals (ug/L),
Arsenic 163000 32867 256500 489000 ND 52900 263000 4340 66000 NS 2920 21500 194000 870 20900 NS 380
Beryllium 540 430 913 840 905 206 1570 678 2570 NS 222 1520 12500 590 2950 NS 350
Cadmium 2600 1958 9260 15400 ND 1960 12200 3460 24000 NS 2550 14800 41000 1190 52100 NS 7400
Chromium 12000 3742 14883 12800 ND 3360 22800 10900 30600 NS 2380 15300 76200 <100 25100 NS 2301
Cobalt 48000 NA 82783 57000 ND 13000 76000 76100 99700 NS 20800 72500 74200 4440 120000 NS 64000
Copper 360000 87333 505000 345000 ND 89000 768000 379000 954000 NS 139000 511000 3000000 9720 515000 NS 35000
Iron 2100000 1278333 4874500 4400000 5970000 1460000 10200000 3400000 9700000 NS 688000 4570000 15400000 262000 13300000 NS 2500000
Lead <20000 2507 9647 16900 ND 17200 16700 1860 14400 NS 1900 9090 4030 15.8 20500 NS <75
Manganese 82000 144000 496833 313000 ND 101000 587000 3110000 2470000 NS 214000 1270000 5690000 102000 4070000 NS 1000000 Not
Mercury ND NA ND 16 ND <4 30.9 9.6 21.6 NS 2.4 7.01 873 <2.00 430 NS 0.20 Sampled -
Molybdenum 52000 12250 122167 209000 14 21300 96200 790 56100 NS 2930 12500 133000 70.1 3740 NS 550 Dry
Nickel 170000 20917 131833 241000 ND 23800 75800 150000 122000 NS 44900 121000 29200 7220 113000 NS 150000
Selenium <2000 910 5856 10200 ND 3080 6900 2460 7060 NS 1370 4330 3170 306 3680 NS 2900
Silver <2500 NA 305 1010 ND 101 792 1850 3380 NS 329 1790 6780 <100 3770 NS 110
Thallium 4700 NA 446 1200 ND 190 518 1080 694 NS 290 602 2160 21.3 3760 NS 170
Tin NA NA 1090 1070 ND 155 325 <100 <100 NS <17000 <100 <17000 <17000 <17000 NS <50
Uranium 118000 67833 332333 636000 3690 180000 458000 835000 1200000 NS 134000 530000 5360000 9630 1110000 NS 19000
Vanadium 210000 158333 935000 1130000 ND 692000 2370000 836000 3220000 NS 454000 1720000 10300000 5600 2420000 NS 54000
Zinc 590000 NA 748833 515000 ND 134000 726000 652000 1430000 NS 155000 899000 7810000 68100 2100000 NS 950000
Cell 3
cm,ca an a IO Oil 1ca Ch . I d R d" I . I Ch aracter1sttcs
i 2013 2018 2019 Constituent 1987 2003 (Avg) 2007 (Avg) 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ReSample 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 ReSample 2020
-Radiologies (pCi/L)
94900 Not
Gross Alpha NA 1015831 16533 21700 17000 4030 11100 1530 81900 NS 19700 (8/4/2015) 86000 292 19700 NS 3890 Sampled-8780 Dry (5/28/2015)
voes (ug/L)
Acetone 28 NA 80 100 67 37 330 64 302 159 <700 82.8 <200 48.4 135 NS 135
Benzene <5 NA ND ND <1 <1 <l <1 <5 <1 <5 .0 <1 <1 <l <l NS <l
Carbon tetrachloride <5 NA ND ND <1 <l <l <1 <5 <l <5.0 <l <l <l <l NS <1
Chloroform 6 NA ND 11 4.2 2.6 31 2 56.3 21 <70.0 1.75 13.2 <1 5.02 NS 18
Chloromethane NA NA ND ND 1.4 1.8 3.5 l <5 2.58 <30.0 1.03 19.8 <l 5.36 NS 2.8 Not
MEK NA NA ND ND <1 <l 67 <20 <100 24.5 <4000 <20 <20 <20 <20 NS 34 Sampled -
Methylene Chloride 10 NA ND ND <l <l 7.4 <1 6.95 <1 <5.0 <1 <1 <1 10.4 NS 0.67 J Dry
Naphthalene <10000 NA ND <10 <l 2.1 1.2 <1 <5 <1 <100 <l <1 <l <1 NS 0.57 J
Tetrahydrofuran NA NA 150 <20 <100 <10 <10 <1 <5 <1 <46.0 <l <l <l 3.01 NS <35.0
Toluene <5 NA ND ND <1 <1 <l <1 <5 <l <1000 <l <1 <1 <l NS <1
Xylenes <5 NA ND ND <1 <l <l <1 <5 <1 <10000 <1 <1 <l <1 NS <1
SVOCS1 ug/L)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
1,2-Dich lorn benzene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
1,3-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
1,4-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <l,490 <7.78 <10
1-Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1 ,490 <7.78 <10
2,4-Dichlorophenol NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
2,4-Dimethylphenol NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
2,4-Dinitrophenol NA NA NA NA <53 <20 <20 <20 <21.1 <20 <20 <20 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <50
2,4-Di ni trotoluene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
2,6-Dinitrotoluene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 Not
2-Chloronaphthalene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 Sampled -
2-Chlorophenol NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 Dry
2-Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
2-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
2-Nitrophenol NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7 .78 <10
3&4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
3,3, -Dichlorobenzidine NA NA NA NA <21 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <45
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol NA NA NA NA <53 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1 ,490 <7.78 <50
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl eth er NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
4-Nitrophenol NA NA NA NA <53 <10 <10 <LO <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1 ,490 <7.78 <50
Acenaphthene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7 .78 <10
Cell 3
em1ca an a 10 oe ,ca Ch . I d R d. I . I Ch aracter1stacs -2013 2018 2019 Constituent 1987 2003 (Avg) 2007 (Avg) 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ReSample 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 ReSample 2020
Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
Anthracene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
Azobenzene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
Benz(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
Benzi dine NA NA NA NA <21 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
Benzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7 .78 <10
Benzo(b )fluoranthene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
Benzo(k)tluoranthene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7 .78 <10
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate NA NA NA NA <11 10.6 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
Butyl benzyl phthalate NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
Chrysene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <l ,490 <7 .78 <10
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
Diethyl phthalate NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
Dimethyl phthalate NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1 ,490 <7.78 <10 Not Di-n-butyl phthalate NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 Sampled -Di-n-octyl phthalate NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
Fluoranthene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10 Dry
Fluorene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
Hexachlorobenzene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7 .78 <10
Hexachlorobutadiene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <27
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
Hexachloroethane NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <27
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
Isophorone NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
Nitrobenzene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
N-Nitrosodimethylamine NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
Pentachlorophenol NA NA NA NA <53 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <50
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
Phenol NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
Pyrene NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <10
Pyridine NA NA NA NA <11 <10 <10 <10 <10.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <1,490 <7.78 <18
1 Historic values reported for Gross Alpha from 1987 and 2003 are total gross alpha reported in pCi/L. All other gross alpha data are reported as Gross Alpha minus Rn & U.
Cell 4A
Chemical and Radiological Characteristics
Constituent 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Major Ions (mg/L)
Carbonate <1 <l <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <l <l <5 <5
Bicarbonate <1 <l <l <l <l <l <l <1 <1 <1 <5 <5
Calcium 627 598 558 591 668 445 604 632 607 707 510 641
Chloride 4650 7350 5870 4980 4530 5900 6410 7040 8060 10100 8670 9120
Fluoride 0.3 21.6 30.6 43 1130 1290 1660 2030 1420 2000 1650 1700
Magnesium 3250 4940 4720 2230 3660 2990 3910 3550 4360 7030 4100 4700
Nitrogen-Ammonia 3140 5230 4930 1540 1340 2730 11 4770 924 9060 6700 10000
Nitrogen-Nitrate 28 52 44 27 38.2 39.5 19.9 41.9 53.4 73.4 70.4 84.8
Potassium 980 1440 1450 558 773 724 1020 915 1500 2020 1200 1660
Sodium 5980 11300 11400 7130 6860 7190 9760 9580 12000 17600 15000 17700
Sulfate 67600 87100 267000 64900 83300 64900 77200 126000 77800 116000 81300 85700
pH (s.u.) 1.4 1.99 1.73 1.2 1.47 1.7 1.51 1.59 1.53 1.25 2.40 2.36
TDS 81400 107000 108000 76000 90000 97000 104000 124000 120000 147000 122000 139000
Conductivity (umhos/cm) 131000 101000 82100 78100 66300 73000 89600 81300 89800 115000 81400 84000
Metals (ug/L)
Arsenic 626000 109000 86600 60500 73700 70000 82600 94400 104000 125000 63000 71300
Beryllium 296 215 323 167 247 190 281 320 440 538 420 485
Cadmium 1920 3670 2190 844 1450 1780 2090 2850 3360 3850 2500 3490
Chromium 3220 7500 5900 5990 5220 4620 5460 7920 8520 9350 7200 9050
Cobalt 9440 26500 22500 22900 22900 27500 26100 32800 37900 41000 28000 32800
Copper 99200 168000 181000 433000 540000 556000 477000 566000 578000 683000 580000 617000
Iron 2360000 2920000 3390000 3190000 2620000 2280000 3090000 3850000 4480000 5320000 3200000 3690000
Lead 5360 11800 11000 5270 11500 14800 11700 14000 15100 16400 9000 8680
Manganese 178000 209000 131000 112000 143000 120000 181000 225000 261000 307000 210000 211000
Mercury 1.19 <4 15.2 2.4 0.786 2.5 0.99 <2 2.30 2.52 2.1 3.4
Molybdenum 24300 43800 24200 58200 25500 40600 35400 43900 40800 59100 19000 25700
Nickel 17100 40900 43500 41300 43300 54100 48700 61300 66800 71900 50000 58800
Selenium 4620 5810 4460 1310 2080 2000 2400 2820 4450 5870 3700 3660
Silver 78 193 216 127 144 197 186 305 379 521 310 487
Thallium 162 350 410 250 256 376 436 568 169 727 90 524
Tin 257 378 319 169 118 <17000 142 <17000 <17000 <17000 77 181
Uranium 118000 217000 153000 91000 112000 159000 171000 214000 193000 244000 35000 42600
Vanadium 918000 1090000 730000 237000 461000 535000 577000 715000 972000 1080000 150000 205000
Zinc 142000 224000 286000 200000 183000 169000 237000 318000 344000 406000 280000 350000
Cell 4A
Chemical and Radiological Characteristics
Constituent 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Radiologies (:pCi/LJ
176000
Gross Alpha 8910 3400 8290 16300 15800 240000 (8/4/2015) 292000 133000 516000 261000 52400 37800
(5/28/2015)
-voes (ug/L)
Acetone 60 55 100 25 28.4 <700 42.5 45.1 21.4 42.7 39 J 16.2
Benzene <l <l <l <l <l <5.0 <1 <1 <1 <l <2.5 <l
Carbon tetrachloride <l <l <1 <1 <1 <5.0 <1 <1 <l <l <2.5 <1
Chloroform 4 8.5 10 <l <l <70.0 <1 <l <l 1.91 1.9 J 1.50
Chloromethane 3.4 5.5 7.9 <l <l <30.0 <1 <l 1.35 1.76 1.7 J 1.90
MEK <1 <l <1 <1 <20 <4000 <20 <20 <20 <20 13 J <5
Methylene Chloride <l <1 <l <20 <1 <5.0 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2.5 <5
Naphthalene 1.8 <1 <1 <l <l <100 <1 <l <l <l <2.5 <1
Tetrahydrofuran <100 <10 <10 1.36 <1 <46.0 <l 12.6 <1 <l <35.0 <5
Toluene <1 <l <1 <1 <1 <1000 <l <l <1 <1 <2.5 <l
Xylenes <l <1 <l <l <l <10000 <l <1 <1 <l <2.5 <3
SVOCS (ug/L)
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30
1,2-Dichlorobenzene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30
1,3-Dichlorobenzene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30
1,4-Dichlorobenzene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30
1-Methylnaphthalene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3.0
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30
2,4-Dichlorophenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30
2,4-Dimethylphenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30
2,4-Dinitrophenol <53 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <10 <10 <8.57 <50 <50
2,4-Dinitrotoluene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30
2,6-Dinitrotoluene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30
2-Chloronaphthalene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <4.1
2-Chlorophenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30
2-Methy !naphthalene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3
2-Methylphenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30
2-Nitrophenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30
3&4-Methylphenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <37
3 ,3, -Dichlorobenzidine <21 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <46 <33
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol <53 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <50 <30
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30
4-Nitrophenol <53 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <50 <30
Acenaphthene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3
Acenaphthylene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3
Cell 4A
Chemical and Radiological Characteristics
Constituent 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Anthracene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 1.2 <3
Azobenzene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30
Benz(a)anthracene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3
Benzi dine <21 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <39
Benzo(a)pyrene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3
Benzo(b )fluoran thene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3
Benzo(k)flu oranthene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate <11 19.6 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3
Butyl benzyl phthalate <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3
Chrysene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3
Di benz( a, h )anthracene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3
Diethyl phthalate <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3
Dimethyl phthalate <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3
Di-n-butyl phthalate <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3
Di-n-octyl phthalate <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3
Fluoranthene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3
Fluorene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3
Hexachlorobenzene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30
Hexachlorobu tadiene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <28 <30
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30
Hexachloroethane <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <28 <30
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3
Isophorone <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <35
Naphthalene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3
Nitro benzene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30
N-Nitrosodimethylamine <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30
Pentachlorophenol <53 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <50 <30
Phenanthrene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3
Phenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <30
Pyrene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.57 <10 <3
Pyridine <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 34.0 <19 <30
Cell4A LDS
Chemical and Radiological Characteristics
Constituent 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Major Ions (mg/L)
Carbonate <1 <l <l <l <1 <1 <1 <l <l <l <5 <5
Bicarbonate <l <l <1 <l <1 <l <l <1 <l <l <5 <5
Calcium 558 474 470 453 429 336 510 446 542 516 520 496
Chloride 7570 4670 6040 2710 1910 4200 2860 5200 8610 4360 7360 3860
Fluoride 0.7 39.4 46 27 1970 1320 282 1150 1370 716 1530 500
Magnesium 6390 3240 5100 2070 1710 2690 2730 3940 4630 3820 3800 3690
Nitrogen-Ammonia 4480 2290 3480 1320 1010 2920 13.4 5050 846 4580 6080 3050
Nitrogen-Nitrate 69 183 94 15 28.9 39 27.4 40.9 63.l 44.0 58.2 60.2
Potassium 1960 934 1500 503 305 415 245 675 1710 539 1000 334
Sodium 12600 6700 11000 3500 2930 4190 3490 8050 11500 6780 13000 5260
Sulfate 92400 41700 77400 39600 31400 56000 50500 91300 89100 68600 72600 59900
pH (s.u.) 1.98 2.53 2.32 2.1 2.32 2.4 2.29 2.04 1.50 1.88 2.39 2.25
TDS 117000 56900 93800 55400 49700 81900 65200 95400 142000 75300 112000 83800
Conductivity (umhos/cm) 150000 49000 66600 39600 31300 53600 50200 62200 97900 63400 75600 53200
Metals {ug/L)
Arsenic 133000 54000 74700 44100 35700 51200 10400 43500 117000 42400 52000 16600
Beryllium 536 295 367 180 188 185 199 289 479 298 370 317
Cadmium 4010 2650 3160 921 1170 4720 4270 4500 4080 3740 1900 4410
Chromium 9140 3890 5940 3930 2630 2780 1760 4250 9410 3930 6500 2820
Cobalt 37300 15200 21700 22300 44300 41200 33700 32100 42700 30600 25000 45800
Copper 222000 116000 150000 481000 754000 439000 160000 331000 650000 376000 500000 273000
Iron 3940000 1420000 2530000 2460000 1370000 1850000 1320000 2330000 5140000 2090000 2500000 1440000
Lead 5270 3400 4520 2300 165 991 46.8 797 15500 118 4200 254
Manganese 389000 157000 207000 95200 86300 98600 96700 184000 296000 136000 190000 137000
Mercury 2.66 6.2 14.7 0.7 <0.5 <0.0020 <0.5 <2.00 <2.00 <2 .00 1.4 0.20
Molybdenum 49200 23900 29300 10200 1200 3970 278 10700 49900 2350 8400 2190
Nickel 43900 23900 29600 35000 54600 99300 86300 72700 74700 70900 46000 110000
Selenium 5250 2820 3780 1260 1020 2170 649 1590 4940 1550 3100 1230
Silver 204 62 127 44 24.8 <100 25.6 144 312 <100 230 150
Thallium 252 194 290 332 171 522 218 439 550 281 55 425
Tin 504 180 119 <100 <100 <17000 <100 <17000 <17000 <17000 <70 <500
Uranium 284000 145000 168000 90200 75000 82200 25000 116000 247000 78600 38000 48000
Vanadium 1150000 518000 770000 240000 157000 510000 253000 449000 1090000 475000 130000 374000
Zinc 298000 152000 204000 181000 163000 306000 510000 502000 385000 446000 210000 541000
Cell 4A LDS
Chemical and Radiological Characteristics
Constituent 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Radiolog!cs (pCJ/L)
17200
Gross Alpha 7020 3230 7440 4730 6930 61800 (8/4/2015) 98700 176000 51000 163000 5450 1670
(5/28/2015)
voes (ug/L)
Acetone 240 130 120 55 57 <700 84.7 61.5 79.8 108 84 90.3
Benzene <l <l <1 <l <l <5.0 <1 <1 <l <l <1 <5
Carbon tetrachloride <l <1 <l <1 <l <5.0 <l <1 <l <1 <1 <5
Chloroform 23 52 26 42 110 95 129 84.5 21.6 33.8 31 120
Chloromethane 7.9 13 3.8 6 9.93 <30.0 5.35 <1.00 3.00 2.41 3.6 6.90
MEK 78 50 82 36 <20 <4000 <20 <20 <20 <20 43 29.5
Methylene Chloride <l <l <l <l <l <5.0 <l <l <l 1.05 0.47 J <25
Naphthalene <l 1.5 <l I 2.35 <100 <1 <l <l <l <l <5
Tetrahydrofuran 140 158 102 117 39.1 <46.0 18.5 <l 15.7 19.7 16 <25
Toluene <l <l <I <l <l <1000 <l <l <l <l <l <5
Xylenes <l <l <l <l <l <10000 <l <1 <1 <l <l <15
SVOCS (ug/L)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30
1,2-Dichlorobenzene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30
1,3-Dichlorobenzene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30
1,4-Dichlorobenzene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30
1-Methylnaphthalene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3.0
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30
2,4-Dichlorophenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30
2,4-Dimethylphenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 11.1 <10 <30
2,4-Dinitrophenol <54 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <10 <10 <9.08 <50 <50
2,4-Dinitrotoluene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9 .08 <10 <30
2,6-Dinitrotoluene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30
2-Chloronaphthalene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <4.1
2-Chlorophenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30
2-Methylnaphthalene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3
2-Methylphenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30
2-Nitrophenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30
3&4-Methylphenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <37
3 ,3 , -Dichlorobenzidine <22 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <46 <33
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol <54 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <50 <30
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30
4-N i tro_pheno I <54 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <50 <30
Acenaphthene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3
Acenaphthylene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3
Cell 4A LDS
Chemical and Radiological Characteristics
Constituent 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Anthracene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3
Azobenzene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30
Benz(a)anthracene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3
Benzi dine <22 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <39
Benzo(a)pyrene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3
Benzo(b )tluoranthene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3
Benzo(k)tluoranthene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3
Bis(2-chl oroethoxy)meth ane <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3
Bis(2-cbloroethyl ) ether <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate <11 54.9 54.9 16.6 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 1.1 <3
Butyl benzyl phthalate <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3
Chrysene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3
Dibenz( a,h )anthracene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3
Diethyl phthalate <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3
Dimethyl phthalate <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3
Di-n-butyl phthalate <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3
Di-n-octyl phthalate <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3
Fluoranthene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3
Fluorene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3
Hexachlorobenzene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30
Hexachlorobutadiene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <28 <30
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30
Hexachloroethane <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <28 <30
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3
Isophorone <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <35
Naphthalene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3
Nitro benzene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30
N-Nitrosodimethylamine <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30
Pentachlorophenol <54 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <50 <30
Phenanthrene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3
Phenol 33 23.5 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <30
Pyrene <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <9.08 <10 <3
Pyridine <11 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 12.9 <19 <30
Cell 4B
Chemical and Radiological Characteristics
Co_nstituent 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Major Ions (mg/L)
Carbonate <l <I <I <l <l <l <1 <l <5 <5
Bicarbonate <l <l <l <l <l <1 <1 <l <5 <5
Calcium 570 580 662 366 655 523 473 664 670 628
Chloride 8290 8170 4570 7300 8500 12000 6930 7860 10500 10200
Fluoride 26.7 23.3 1050 1150 1210 1780 1170 1410 2300 1730
Magnesium 3910 4500 3560 3310 5530 5780 3550 5790 6500 4520
Nitrogen-Ammonia 5220 5580 2060 5380 1.09 8690 724 7590 8150 6580
Nitrogen-Nitrate 39 42 51.4 47 15.2 64.5 31.3 42.2 38.6 70.0
Potassium 1370 1650 1110 989 1700 1710 1230 1660 1900 1680
Sodium 9050 11700 3150 7100 12800 14100 10600 15700 18000 17100
Sulfate 134000 119000 98100 91500 108000 285000 708000 98400 124000 97200
pH (s.u.) 1.87 1.5 1.65 1.6 1.35 1.26 1.41 1.24 1.53 2.24
IDS 98000 128000 108000 131000 149000 172000 103000 117000 180000 150000
Conductivity (umhos/cm) 76900 86900 72800 90100 115000 116000 93800 107000 99600 87300
Metals (ug/L)
Arsenic 67400 80000 65400 70400 106000 139000 82700 97800 140000 67900
Beryllium 311 356 334 275 430 557 347 407 640 455
Cadmium 1990 2540 1990 2290 2980 4260 2340 2520 2000 1800
Chromium 6860 8280 6390 6940 7450 11900 7800 8630 12000 9350
Cobalt 17800 29300 21300 24600 33700 46700 30300 32900 44000 30900
Copper 193000 340000 340000 368000 499000 684000 457000 539000 830000 602000
Iron 2960000 3580000 2830000 2480000 4340000 6340000 3690000 4400000 5800000 3690000
Lead 9960 11600 9820 10900 13400 17900 12200 12500 16000 8150
Manganese 128000 148000 154000 129000 231000 325000 207000 242000 320000 201000
Mercury 13.7 2.6 1.49 <0.0020 1.72 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 0.46 0.40
Molybdenum 21400 27600 26100 29000 39800 55400 22600 27400 29000 81 JO
Nickel 33900 50500 35100 42000 56400 79600 53000 57800 78000 56400
Selenium 4670 4470 3900 5010 5600 7300 3740 4510 6600 3540
Silver 137 169 137 142 195 307 <100 160 170 76
Thallium 237 368 243 258 408 559 17.5 33.7 <100 165
Tin 196 215 163 <17000 211 <17000 <17000 <17000 340 138
Uranium 133000 171000 110000 133000 200000 278000 23100 28100 36000 47400
Vanadium 660000 783000 163000 666000 881000 868000 746000 828000 710000 113000
Zinc 191000 270000 184000 144000 313000 476000 267000 323000 280000 334000
Cell 4B
Chemical and Radiological Characteristics
Constituent 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Radiologies (pCi/(i) --
267000
Gross Alpha 8590 13600 14600 148000 (8/4/2015) 42500 262000 132000 320000 310000 54500
(5/28/2015)
voes (ug/L)
Acetone 130 94 43.5 <700 56.2 86.4 38.6 56.8 39 12.7
Benzene <l <l <I <5.0 <l <l <l <I <l <I
Carbon tetrachloride <1 <l <l <5 .0 <l <l <1 <l <I <I
Chloroform 9.4 4 8.06 <70.0 2.34 3.07 2.39 2.17 3.4 <l
Chloromethane 8.5 8 7.12 <30.0 3.62 6.01 1.26 1.72 2.1 1.28
MEK <l <l <20 <4000 <20 <20 <20 27.4 15 J <5
Methylene Chloride <l <l <l <5 .0 <l <1 <l <l <l <5
Naphthalene <I <1 <1 <100 <I <1 <l <l <l <l
Tetrahydrofuran <10 11.l <l <46.0 <I <1 <l 1.87 <35.0 <5
Toluene <l <l <l <1000 <l <1 <l <l <l <l
Xvlenes <l <l <l <10000 <1 <l <1 <1 <l <3
SVOCS (ug/L)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30
1,2-Dichlorobenzene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30
1,3-Dichlorobenzene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30
1,4-Dich lorobenzene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30
1-Methylnaphthalene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3.0
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30
2,4-Dichlorophenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <50 <30
2,4-Dimethylphenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30
2,4-Di nitrophenol <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <50
2,4-Dinitrotoluene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30
2,6-Dinitrotoluene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30
2-Chloronaphthalene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <4.1
2-Chlorophenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <LO <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30
2-Methylnaphthalene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3
2-Methylphenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30
2-Nitrophenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30
3&4-Methylphenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <37
3,3 '-Dichlorobenzidine <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <44 <33
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <50 <30
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether <10 <10 <10 <10 <LO <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30
4-Nitrophenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <50 <30
Acenaphthene <10 <LO <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3
Acenaphthylene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3
Anthracene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <IO <10 <8.72 1.7 <3
Azobenzene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <LO <10 <8.72 <10 <30
Cell 4B
Chemical and Radiological Characteristics
Constituent 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Benz( a )anthracene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3
Benzi dine <10 <10 <10 26 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <39
Benzo(a)pyrene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3
Benzo(b )fluoranthene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3
Benzo(g,h,i }perylene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3
Benzo(k)fluoramhene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 410 19 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <IO <3
Butyl benzyl phthalate <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8 .72 <10 <3
Chrysene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3
Di benz( a, h )anthracene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3
Diethyl phthalate <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3
Dimethyl phthalate <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3
Di-n-butyl phthalate <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3
Di-n-octyl phthalate <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3
Auoranthene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3
Auorene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3
Hexachlorobenzene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30
Hexachlorobutadiene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <26 <30
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30
Hexachloroethane <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <26 <30
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3
lsophorone <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <35
Naphthalene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3
Nitro benzene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30
N-Nitrosodimethylamine <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30
Pentachlorophenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <50 <30
Phenanthrene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3
Phenol <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <30
Pyrene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.72 <10 <3
Pyridine <LO <10 <10 15 <10 <10 <10 31.7 <18 <30
Cell 4B LDS
Chemical and Radiological Characteristics
Constituent 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
-Major Ions (mg/L) -
Carbonate <l <1 dry <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <5 <5
Bicarbonate <1 <1 dry <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <5 <5
Calcium 486 456 dry 308 538 547 516 592 550 555
Chloride 3630 6850 dry 6900 7960 8510 10400 8060 8050 7630
Fluoride 28.4 22 dry 970 1150 1290 1050 1480 1680 1550
Magnesium 3230 3360 dry 3400 5190 4780 5370 5580 4800 4830
Nitrogen-Ammonia 4260 4090 dry 5240 2.43 7540 739 7510 7080 5080
Nitrogen-Nitrate 30 31 dry 43 16.6 49.6 63.9 47.4 41.2 39.5
Potassium 1130 1060 dry 952 1560 1360 2130 1620 1400 1350
Sodium 8240 8080 dry 6920 11900 10800 13200 14500 13000 12600
Sulfate 59900 99100 dry 82300 104000 163000 117000 100000 89500 88700
pH (s.u.) 2.23 2.4 dry 2.2 1.51 1.88 1.44 1.35 1.73 1.89
TDS 85800 90200 dry 129000 131000 133000 168000 132000 131000 134000
Conductivity (umhos/cm) 63000 62400 dry 76300 106000 68400 105000 104000 80800 77600
Metals (ug/L)
Arsenic 54200 41200 dry 67800 98400 98800 135000 94100 89000 84900
Beryllium 274 271 dry 282 411 430 559 416 470 483
Cadmium 1670 1740 dry 2290 2790 3250 4500 2610 2000 2060
Chromium 6250 5930 dry 6160 7320 9470 13700 8980 9100 9620
Cobalt 15600 19000 dry 23300 31100 33600 48900 31700 31000 32200
Copper 176000 181000 dry 308000 458000 475000 681000 497000 550000 500000
Iron 2450000 2120000 dry 2590000 4180000 4680000 5910000 4190000 4400000 4180000
Lead 6060 4420 dry 4120 10100 5860 14000 8770 7800 5110
Manganese 118000 162000 dry 144000 222000 262000 346000 239000 240000 221000
Mercury 12.3 3 dry 0.002 1.47 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 0.111 0.10
Molybdenum 16700 15000 dry 24300 36300 35500 52900 25900 27000 19800
Nickel 30700 33700 dry 40100 52600 58100 84400 56100 59000 57900
Selenium 3710 2880 dry 4080 5080 5310 6860 4500 4700 3950
Silver 111 117 dry 119 179 224 266 156 170 173
Thallium 179 175 dry 336 354 414 427 245 87 98
Tin 332 <100 dry <17000 198 <17000 <17000 <17000 200 258
Uranium 111000 132000 dry 143000 185000 192000 269000 54200 31000 34600
Vanadium 518000 428000 dry 671000 817000 847000 1260000 811000 760000 743000
Zinc 172000 182000 dry 144000 296000 315000 443000 303000 280000 286000
Cell 4B LDS
Chemical and Radiological Characteristics
Constituent 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Radiologies (pCi/L)
375000
Gross Alpha 6000 7500 dry 181000 (8/4/2015) 185000 165000 305000 226000 54100 52500
(5/28/2015)
voes (ug/L)
Acetone 390 370 dry <700 218 266 479 147 102 68.5
Benzene <1 <1 dry <5 .0 <l <1 <1 <l <1 <l
Carbon tetrachloride <l <l dry <5.0 <l <1 <1 <l <1 <l
Chloroform 20 19 dry <70.0 5.03 9.97 9.13 4.74 3.9 1.22
Chloromethane 11 11 dry <30.0 9.72 10.8 7.16 2.4 2.3 <l
MEK 240 180 dry <4000 71.8 53.6 89.4 34.6 71 42.8
Methylene Chloride <l <l dry <5.0 <l <l 1.01 <l <l <5
Naphthalene <1 <l dry <100 <l <1 <l <l <1 <l
Tetrahydrofuran 198 322 dry 75.6 36.6 75.9 51.2 17.3 53 96.5
Toluene <l <l dry <1000 <l <1 <l <l <1 <1
Xylenes <1 <l dry <10000 <l <1 <1 <l <1 <3
SVOCS (ug/L)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30
1,2-Dichlorobenzene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30
1,3-Dichlorobenzene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30
1,4-Dichlorobenzene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30
1-Methylnaphthalene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3.0
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8 .79 <10 <30
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30
2,4-Dichlorophenol <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30
2,4-Dimethylphenol <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8 .79 <10 <30
2,4-Dinitrophenol <20 <20 dry <20 <20 <20 <10 <8 .79 <50 <50
2,4-Dini trotoluene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30
2,6-Dinitrotoluene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30
2-Chloronaphthalene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <4.1
2-Chlorophenol <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30
2-Methylnaphthalene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3
2-Methylphenol <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30
2-Nitrophenol <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30
3&4-Methylphenol <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 0.42 <37
3,3, -Dichlorobenzidine <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <45 <33
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <50 <30
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30
4-Nitrophenol <10 <10 Jry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <50 <30
Acenaphthene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3
Acenaphthylene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3
Cell 4B LDS
Chemical and Radiological Characteristics
Constituent 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Anthracene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3
Azobenzene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30
Benz( a)anthracene <10 <10 drv <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3
Benzi dine <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <39
Benzo(a)pyrene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3
Benzo(b )fluoranthene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3
Benzo(k)fluoranthene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 191 191 dry 27 <10 132 145 65.9 16 <3
Butyl benzyl phthalate <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3
Chrysene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3
Dibenz(a,h)a nthracene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3
Diethyl phthalate <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3
Dimethyl phthalate <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3
Di-n-butyl phthalate <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3
Di-n-octyl phthalate <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3
Fluoranthene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3
Fluorene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3
Hexachlorobenzene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30
Hexachlorobutadiene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <27 <30
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30
Hexachloroethane <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <27 <30
lndeno(l ,2,3-cd)ovrene <10 <10 drv <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3
Isophorone <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <35
Naphthalene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3
Nitrobenzene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30
N-Nitrosodimethylamine <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30
Pentachlorophenol <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <50 <30
Phenanthrene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3
Phenol <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <30
Pyrene <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 <8.79 <10 <3
Pyridine <10 <10 dry <10 <10 <10 <10 29.1 <18 <30
Cell I
Additional Radiological Analyses
Thorium-228 Thorium-230 Thorium-232 Radium-226 Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Specific Gravity (nCi/L) (nCi/L) <nCi/L) (nCi/L) (nCi/L) (nCi/L) (nCi/L)
8/4/15 1310 991000 6150 1110 141000 8920 140000 1.21
5/28/15 204 782000 6730 829 96700 5980 100000 1.13
8/30/16 ND 677000 4480 497 2380 45800 1.15
8/29/17 2890 8100000 76000 391 353000 20400 344000 1.17
8/1/18 ND 856000 8410 443 97300 6970 97200 1.16
8/21/19 1380 747000 4780 348 28400 1650 28700 1.15
8/21/2019
(Cell 65 -1500 663000 5720 434 25500 1960 27700 1.15 Duplicate
of Cell 1)
8/19/20 1090 1030000 6670 801 68300 4020 64600 1.33
Cell 2 Slimes Drain
1 mna a 10 og1ca Add'f I R d' I • I A na yses
Thorium-228 Thorium-230 Thorium-232 Radium-226 Uranium-Uranium-Uranium-238 Specific Gravity (pCi/L) (pCi/L) (pCi/L) (pCi/L) 233/234 (pCi/L) 235/236 (pCi/L) (pCi/L)
8/4/15 ND 6680 ND 36.6 11300 858 10500 1.09
8/30/16 ND 5050 ND 52.4 11700 599 10700 1.03
8/29/17 ND 38500 ND 51.2 111000 ND 75600 1.07
8/1/2018 ND 7390 ND 36.2 14900 ND 12500 1.07
8/1/2018
(cell 65 -
Duplicate ND 6860 ND 29.8 10700 3440 12600 1.06
of Cell 2
Slimes)
8/21/2019 ND 1750 ND 62.5 9300 484 9150 1.03
8/19/2020 ND 5180 ND 86.0 8680 917 8760 1.08
Cell 3
Additional Radiological Analyses
Thorium-228 Thorium-230 Thorium-232 Radium-226 Uranium-Uranium-Uranium-238 Specific Gravity (pCi/L) (pCi/L) (pCi/L) (pCi/L) 233/234 (pCi/L) 235/236 (pCi/L) (pCi/L)
8/4/15 ND 123000 1640 448 184000 10300 191000 1.21
5/28/15 798 131000 1290 202 557000 37900 591000 1.29
8/30/16 983 72500 1670 584 1960000 130000 2060000 1.62
~/.:SU/ID
(cell 65 -
Duplicate ND 67000 788 640 2520000 130000 2490000 1.53
of Cell 3)
8/29/17 ND ND ND 101 37600 ND 32800 0.989
8/1/18 ND 28100 2310 79.8 398000 24000 468000 1.21
8/21/19 ND 6610 ND 48.0 6640 ND 5780 1.07
8/19/20 Not Sampled -Dry
Cell 4A
Add" . I R d" I . I A I 1bona a 10 og1ca na yses
Thorium-228 Thorium-230 Thorium-232 Radium-226 Uranium-Uranium-Uranium-238 Specific Gravity <nCi/L) (pCi/L) <nCi/L) (pCi/L) 233/234 (oCi/L) 235/236 <nCi/L) <nCi/L)
8/4/15 ND 374000 3490 663 57500 3720 64400 1.11
5/28/15 327 405000 3440 ND 61200 4030 62700 1.07
5/28/2015
(Cell 65 -
Duplicate 265 315000 3790 772 58600 3020 58300 NS
of Cell
4A)
8/30/16 ND 466000 2870 1050 61100 3320 70900 1.10
8/29/17 ND 4450000 47700 759 637000 30600 692000 1.09
8/29/17
(Cell 65 -
Duplicate ND 4080000 11000 822 602000 44900 616000 1.12
of Cell
4A)
8/1/18 1970 539000 8230 59.2 88700 9900 86300 1.10
8/21/19 941 430000 2870 260 9350 674 10900 1.02
8/19/20 1040 521000 4130 395 17200 991 13700 1.10
8/19/2020
(Cell 65 -
Duplicate ND 488000 2200 372 14100 1000 14300 1.11
of Cell
4A)
Cell 4A LDS
Add. . I R d. I . I A al 1ttona a 10 og,ca n yses
Thorium-228 Thorium-230 Thorium-232 Radium-226 Uranium-Uranium-Uranium-238 Specific Gravity (pCi/L) (pCi/L) (pCi/L) (pCi/L) 233/234 (pCi/L) 235/236 (pCi/L) (pCi/L)
8/4/15 ND 25300 ND 19.3 9380 504 10800 1.07
5/28/15 ND 25300 ND 19.3 9380 504 10800 NS
8/30/16 ND 134000 1130 51.1 46200 1900 40400 1.10
8/29/17 ND 5410000 49200 286 852000 66200 851000 1.17
8/1/18 ND 76000 ND 38.2 28800 ND 30500 1.05
8/21/19 1060 366000 2230 73.4 13500 738 13000 1.02
8/19/20 ND 39500 ND 18.6 19000 711 16600 1.07
Cell 4B
Additional Rai.liological Analyses
Thorium-228 Thorium-230 Thorium-232 Radium-226 Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Specific Gravity (nCi/L) <nCi/L) <nCi/L) <nCi/L) <nCi/L) <nCi/L) (nCi/L)
8/4/15 ND 410000 2210 611 63500 3710 67000 1.12
5/28/15 122 346000 3790 544 65000 3870 66100 1.08
8/30/16 ND 595000 3510 715 90200 4090 90100 1.13
8/29/17 ND 3390000 56000 489 76000 8100 92700 1.07
8/1/18 ND 461000 7360 307 13700 ND 8420 1.08
8/21/19 1080 434000 3490 296 11600 563 10800 1.10
8/19/20 1280 606000 4320 360 17000 1080 17700 1.11
Thorium-228 Thorium-230
(oCi/L) (oCi/L)
8/4/15 ND 452000
8/4/15
(Cell 65 -
Duplicate ND 436000
ofCell 4B
LOS)
5/28/15 334 487000
8/30/16 ND 368000
8/29/17 4680 5220000
8/1/18 1520 424000
8/21/19 1030 368000
8/19/20 888 541000
Cell 4B LDS
Additional Radiological Analyses
Thorium-232 Radium-226 Uranium-
(oCi/L) (oCi/L) 233/234 (oCi/L)
3660 161 62600
4000 125 62600
5430 55.2 63500
1010 104 78600
43200 143 846000
5130 88.3 14300
2650 105 8840
4070 153 11700
Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Specific Gravity (oCi/L) CoCi/L)
3890 60900 1.12
2680 61300 1.12
3900 65500 NS
3820 78900 1.11
64200 894000 1.07
ND 18400 1.09
412 9600 1.05
749 14500 1.11
TabE
Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
Table E-1 Holding Time Evaluation**
Cell I €ell ~ Elell 3 Cell4A CeJl4A Cell4B ,CeJl413 ell 65 Required Hi lding Time limes Qlullons lDra.ia olu.tion Solu{Jons LIDS Solu1i0J1S' LO (Cell I
Carbonate 14 days OK OK NS -Dry OK OK OK OK OK
Bicarbonate 14 days OK OK NS -Dry OK OK OK OK OK
Calcium 6 months OK OK NS -Dry OK OK OK OK OK
Chloride 28 days OK OK NS -Dry OK OK OK OK OK
Fluoride 28 days OK *** NS-Dry OK OK OK OK OK
Magnesium 6 months OK OK NS -Dry OK OK OK OK OK
Nitrogen-Ammonia 28 days OK OK NS -Dry OK OK OK OK OK
Nitrogen-Nitrate 28 days OK OK NS -Dry OK OK OK OK OK
Potassium 6 months OK OK NS -Dry OK OK OK OK OK
Sodium 6 months OK OK NS-Dry OK OK OK OK OK
Sulfate 28 days OK OK NS -Dry OK OK OK OK OK
pH (pH units) Immediately OK* OK* NS -Dry OK* OK* OK* OK* OK*
TDS 7 days OK OK NS -Dry OK OK OK OK OK
Conductivity (umhos/cm) NIA OK OK NS -Dry OK OK OK OK OK
6 months (except
mercury which is 28
Metals days) OK OK NS -Dry OK OK OK OK OK
Radiologies 6 months OK OK NS -Dry OK OK OK OK OK
VOCS (including THF) 14 days OK OK NS -Dry OK OK OK OK OK
7 days to extraction/40
svocs days for analysis OK OK NS -Dry OK OK OK OK OK
* Per the method, pH should be analyzed within 15 minutes of sample collection. Due to the nature of the solution matrix, sample handling in the
field is minimized and pH is measured by the laboratory upon receipt. This procedure change was requested by and approved by DWMRC.
** -The voluntary analyses conducted for specific gravity, thorium isotopes, uranium isotopes, and radium-226 are for informational purposes only.
These analyses do not have QAP required holding times, and therefore, are not included in the holding time evaluation.
E-2 Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check
/\"'lil~k 011<lfer ~mn~lil~·,lJ.inli'l
Se.l ID ~ee.etwt Terup
GEL-519405 3.0 °C
EL -C20080962 2.4 ·c
NI A = These shipments contained samples for the analysis of
radionuclides only. Samples submitted for radionuclide
analyses do not have a sample temperature requirement.
E-3: Analytical Method Check -Routine Samples**
ParameJer QAP/PeJ.1mit Method Method Used ~Y Lab
Ammonia (as N) A4500-NH3 G or E350.1 E350.l
Nitrate+ Nitrite (as N) E353.1 or E353.2 E353.2
Metals E200.7 or E200.8 (Hg 245.1) E200.7 and E200.8 and 245.1 (Hg)
Gross Alpha E900.0 or E900.1 or E903.0 E903.0
voes SW8260B or SW8260C SW8260B
Chloride A4500-Cl B or E300.0 E300.0
Fluoride A4500-F C or E300.0 A4500-FC
Sulfate A4500-S04 E or E300.0 E300.0
TDS A2540C SM2540C
Carbonate as C03, Bicarbonate as HC03 A2320 B SM2320B
pH Not Specified A4500-H B
Conductivity Not Specified SM2510B
SVOCs SW8270D SW8270D
** -The volunla ry anal 1ses conducted for s ecifi y p g ravit , lhorium i oto e ', uranium isoto es, and radium-226 are for y p p
informational purposes only. These analyses do not have QAP required methods, and therefore, are not included in the
analytical method evaluation.
E-4 Reporting Limit Evaluation**
Pa~ameter Permit-Specified RL
Ammonia (as N) 25 mg/L
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 10 mg/L
Metals ug/L
Arsenic 50
Beryllium 4
Cadmium 5
Chromium 100
Cobalt 730
Copper 1300
Iron 11000
Lead 15
Manganese 800
Mercury 2
Molybdenum 40
Nickel 100
Selenium 50
Silver 100
Thallium 2
Tin 17000
Uranium 30
Vanadium 60
Zinc 5000
Gross Alpha 15
voes ug/L
Acetone 700
Benzene 5
Carbon tetrachloride 5
Chloroform 70
Chloromethane 30
MEK (2-Butanone) 4000
Methylene Chloride 5
Naphthalene 100
Tetrahydrofuran 46
Toluene 1000
Xylenes 10000
Major Ions
Chloride 1.0 mg/L
Fluoride 4mg/L
Sulfate 1000 mg/L
TDS 1000 mg/L
Carbonate as C03, Bicarbonate as HC03 *
Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium, Sodium *
SVOCs (from the 8270D LLD) ug/L
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 10
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 10
E-4 Reporting Limit Evaluation**
Parameter Permit-Specified RL
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 10
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 10
1-Methy ]naphthalene 10
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 10
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 10
2,4-Dichlorophenol 10
2,4-Dimethylphenol 10
2,4-Dinitrophenol 50
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 10
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 10
2-Chloronaphthalene 10
2-Chlorophenol 10
2-Methy ]naphthalene 10
2-Methylphenol 10
2-Nitrophenol 10
3&4-Methylphenol 10
3,3 '-Dichlorobenzidine 20
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 50
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 10
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 20
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 10
4-Nitrophenol 50
Acenaphthene 10
Acenaphthylene 10
Anthracene 10
Azobenzene *
Benz(a)anthracene 10
Benzi dine *
Benzo(a)pyrene 10
Benzo(b )fluoranthene 10
Benzo(g,h,i)pery Jene 10
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 10
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 10
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether 10
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether 10
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate *
Butyl benzyl phthalate 10
Chrysene 10
Dibenz( a,h)anthracene 10
Diethyl phthalate 10
Dimethyl phthalate 10
Di-n-butyl phthalate 10
Di-n-octyl phthalate 10
Fluoranthene 10
Fluorene 10
E-4 Reporting Limit Evaluation**
Parameter Permit-Specified RL
Hexachlorobenzene 10
Hexachlorobutadiene 10
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 10
Hexachloroethane 10
fudeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene 10
lsophorone 10
Naphthalene 10
Nitrobenzene 10
N-Nitrosodimethylamine *
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 10
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 10
Pentachlorophenol 50
Phenanthrene 10
Phenol 10
Pyrene 10
Pyridine *
All analyses were reported to the required RLs unless noted in the text.
* Reporting limits for these analytes are not specified in either the Permit
or EPA Method 8270D.
** -The voluntary analyses conducted for specific gravity, thorium isotopes, uranium
isotopes, and radium-226 are for informational purposes only. These analyses do not
have QAP required reporting limits, and therefore, are not included in the reporting
limit evaluation.
E-5: Trip Blank Evaluation
Lab Report Constituent Result Units
2-Butanone ND ug/L
Acetone 5.80 ug/L
Benzene ND ug/L
Carbon tetrachloride ND ug/L
Chloroform ND ug/L
519405 Chloromethane ND ug/L
Methylene Chloride ND ug/L
Naphthalene ND ug/L
Tetrahydrofuran ND ug/L
Toluene ND ug/L
Xylenes ND ug/L
. up. re.ate ~ amp e e alive E 6D I' s IR I ' P ercent I ere nee""" D'ff
Majorlons(Ing/1) Cell 4A Cell 65 RPO%
Carbonate <5 <5 NC
Bicarbonate <5 <5 NC
Calcium 641 594 7.6
Chloride 9120 8670 5.1
Fluoride 1700 1640 3.6
Magnesium 4700 4330 8.2
Nitrogen-Ammonia 10000 10800 7.7
Nitrogen-Nitrate 84.8 81.0 4.6
Potassium 1660 1540 7.5
Sodium 17700 16300 8.2
Sulfate 85700 81900 4.5
pH (s.u.) 2.36 2.28 3.4
TDS 139000 137000 1.4
Conductivity (umhos/cm) 84000 83300 0.8
Metals (Inell)
Arsenic 71300 61900 14.1
Bervllium 485.00 441.00 9.5
Cadmium 3490 3060 13.1
Chromium 9050 7990 12.4
Cobalt 32800 28700 13.3
Copper 617000 543000 12.8
Iron 3690000 3250000 12.7
Lead 8680 7780 10.9
Manganese 211000 193000 8.9
Mercury 3.4 3.4 0.0
Molybdenum 25700 26200 1.9
Nickel 58800 51500 13.2
Selenium 3660 3200 13.4
Silver 487 424 13.8
Thallium 524 104 NC
Tin 181 <200 NC
Uranium 42600 38800 9.3
Vanadium 205000 183000 11.3
Zinc 350000 310000 12.1
Radioloe:ics (pCi/1)
Gross Alpha* 52400 53700 1.25
-voes (u!?IL) -
Acetone 16.2 14.7 9.7
Benzene <1.00 <1.00 NC
Carbon tetrachloride <1.00 <1.00 NC
Chloroform 1.50 1.53 2.0
Chloromethane 1.90 1.86 2.1
MEK <5.00 <5.00 NC
Methylene Chloride <5.00 <5.00 NC
Naphthalene <1.00 <1.00 NC
Tetrahvdrofuran <5.00 <5.00 NC
Toluene <1.00 <1.00 NC
Xylenes <3.00 <3.00 NC
SVOCS (u!?IL)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <30 <30 NC
1,2-Dichlorobenzene <30 <30 NC
1.3-Dichlorobenzene <30 <30 NC
1,4-Dichlorobenzene <30 <30 NC
1-Methylnaphthalene <3.0 <3.0 NC
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol <30 <30 NC
2,4.6-Trichlorophenol <30 <30 NC
2,4-Dichlorophenol <30 <30 NC
2,4-Dimethv !phenol <30 <30 NC
2,4-Dinitrophenol <50 <50 NC
2,4-Dinitrotoluene <30 <30 NC
2,6-Dinitrotoluene <30 <30 NC
-up1 ca e E 60 li I S ampe e ative IR I ' P ercent I erence o·n **
Major Ions (mg/I) CeU4A Cell 65 RPD%
2-Chloronaphthalene <4.1 <4.1 NC
2-Chlorophenol <30 <30 NC
2-Methylnaphthalene <3 <3 NC
2-Methylphenol <30 <30 NC
2-Nitrophenol <30 <30 NC
3&4-Methylphenol <37 <37 NC
3,3 '-Dichlorobenzidine <33 <33 NC
4,6-Dinitro-2-methy]phenol <30 <30 NC
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether <30 <30 NC
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol <30 <30 NC
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether <30 <30 NC
4-Nitrophenol <30 <30 NC
Acenaphthene <3 <3 NC
Acenaphthylene <3 <3 NC
Anthracene <3 <3 NC
Azobenzene (1.2-Diphenylhydrazine) <30 <30 NC
Benz(a)anthracene <3 <3 NC
Benzidine <39 <39 NC
Benzo(a)pyrene <3 <3 NC
Benzo(b)fluoranthene <3 <3 NC
Benzo(g,h.i)perylene <3 <3 NC
Benzo(k)fluoranthene <3 <3 NC
Bi s(2-chloroethox y )methane <3 <3 NC
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether <30 <30 NC
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether <30 <30 NC
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate <3 <3 NC
Butyl benzyl phthalate <3 <3 NC
Chrysene <3 <3 NC
Dibenz(a.h)anthracene <3 <3 NC
Diethvl phthalate <3 <3 NC
Dimethyl phthalate <3 <3 NC
Di-n-butvl phthalate <3 <3 NC
Di-n-octyl phthalate <3 <3 NC
Fluoranthene <3 <3 NC
Fluorene <3 <3 NC
Hexachlorobenzene <30 <30 NC
Hexachlorobutadiene <30 <30 NC
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene <30 <30 NC
Hexachloroethane <30 <30 NC
lndeno(l ,2,3-cd)pyrene <3 <3 NC
Isophorone <35 <35 NC
Naphthalene <3 <3 NC
Nitrobenzene <30 <30 NC
N-Nitrosodimethylamine <30 <30 NC
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine <30 <30 NC
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine <30 <30 NC
Pentachlorophenol <30 <30 NC
Phenanthrene <3 <3 NC
Phenol <30 <30 NC
Pyrene <3 <3 NC
Pyridine <30 <30 NC
* Duplicate checks reported for gross alpha minus RN and U are not %RPO. Calculated values are based on the formula in the approved
QAP.
** -The voluntary analyses conducted for specific gravity, thorium isotopes, uranium isotopes, and radium-226 are for informational
purposes only. These analyses do not have QAP required duplicate requirements, and therefore, are not included in the duplicate
evaluation.
NC = Not Calculated.
E-7 Radiologies Counting Error
<3\)ro A.l'P,lha
m:i,Jil11 Rim .,'s! C111uttirag
6,r@:.;.-Al!Jp:lila U Pre-ei_<,,1], n E.1\\ r ~ '¥,iq~
hlpleID l)l.ili1.111l!J!$ _Ri,~ ,& U (±) .dil% OWQS OlWQS
Cell 1 83800 890 y 15 NA
Cell 2 Slimes 1630 132 y 15 NA
Cell 4A 52400 755 y 15 NA
Cell4ALDS 5450 227 y 15 NA
Cell 4B 54500 702 y 15 NA
Cell4B LDS 54100 680 y 15 NA
Cell 65 (Duplicate of Cell 4A) 53700 713 y 15 NA
GWQS = Groundwater Quality Standard
E-8: Laboratory Matrix QC
Matrix Spike % Recovery Comparison
LabRllport Sample ID
C20080962 Cell 1
C20080962 Cell 1
C20080962 Cell 4B LDS
C20080962 Cell 65 (Duplicate of Cell 4A)
C20080962 Cell 1
C20080962 Cell 1
C20080962 Cell 1
C20080962 Cell 1
C20080962 Cell 1
C20080962 Cell 2 Slimes
C20080962 Cell 2 Slimes
C20080962 Cell 2 Slimes
C20080962 Cell 1
C20080962 Cell 1
NC = Not Calculated
.-\nltlyte
Fluoride
Ammonia
Nitrate
Iron*
Arsenic*
Copper*
Molybdenum*
Vanadium*
Zinc*
Arsenic*
Molybdenum
Zinc*
Beryllium
Thallium
~@
MS %'RE€ %RE€
112 NIA
84 82
51 46
NC NC
NC NC
NC NC
NC NC
NC NC
NC NC
NC NC
-212 -209
NC NC
57 56
56 56
* Recovery was not calculated as the analyte level in the sample was greater than 4 times the spike amount
LCS % Recovery
All Laboratory Control Samples were within acceptance limits.
Laboratory Duplicate % Recovery Comparison
All Laboratory Duplicates were within acceptance limits.
Method Blanks
All Method Blanks for the quarter were non-detect.
Surrogate % Recovery
All surrogate recoveries were within acceptance limits.
REC J,tange RPD
90 -110 NC
90 -110 3
90 -110 1.5
70-130 NC
70 -130 NC
70-130 NC
70-130 NC
70 -130 NC
70-130 NC
70 -130 NC
70-130 2.1
70 -130 NC
70 -130 1.4
70-130 1