DRC-2020-001382 - 0901a06880bc5cb5

DI3C-202,0- 001381
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Blvd. Suite 600
Lakewood, CO, US, 80228
303 974 2140
www.energyfuels.corn it 'ENERGY FUELS
VIA Express Delivery
January 14, 2020
Div of Waste Management
and Radiation Control
JAN 1 7 2020
Mr. Ty L. Howard
Director of Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144880
Salt Lake City, UT 84116
Re: Transmittal of Annual Seeps and Springs Monitoring Report
Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit UGW370004 White Mesa Uranium Mill
Dear Mr. Howard:
Enclosed are two copies of the White Mesa Uranium Mill Annual Seeps and Springs Monitoring
Report for 2019 as required by the Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit UGW370004, as well as
two CDs that contain a word searchable electronic copy of this report.
If you should have any questions regarding this report please contact me at 303-389-4134.
Yours very truly,
ENERGY FUELS RESOU CES (USA) INC.
Kathy Weinel
Quality Assurance Manager
CC: David Frydenlund
Scott Bakken
Paul Goranson
Terry Slade
VIA Express Delivery
January 14, 2020
Mr. Ty L. Howard
Director of Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144880
Salt Lake City, UT 84116
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Blvd. Suite 600
Lakewood, CO, US, 80228
303 974 2140
www.encrgyfu I . m
Re: Transmittal of Annual Seeps and Springs Monitoring Report
Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit UGW370004 White Mesa Uranium Mill
Dear Mr. Howard:
Enclosed are two copies of the White Mesa Uranium Mill Annual Seeps and Springs Monitoring
Report for 2019 as required by the Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit UGW370004, as well as
two CDs that contain a word searchable electronic copy of this report.
If you should have any questions regarding this report please contact me at 303-389-4134.
Yours very truly,
ENERGY FUELS REsou CE (USA) INC.
Kathy Weinel
Quality Assurance Manager
CC: David Frydenlund
Scott Bakken
Paul Goranson
Terry Slade
White Mesa Uranium Mill
2019 Annual Seeps and Springs Sampling Report
State of Utah
Groundwater Discharge Permit No. UGW370004
Prepared by:
~RGYFUELS
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Blvd., Suite 600
Lakewood, CO 80228
January 4, 2020
Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. I
2.0 SAMPLING EVENTS ............................................................................................................................. I
2.1 March 2019 Sampling ......................................................................................................................... I
2.2 June 2019 Sampling ............................................................................................................................ I
2.3 Repeat Visits to Dry Seeps and Springs .............................................................................................. 1
2.4 Sampling Procedures .......................................................................................................................... 2
2.5 Field Data ............................................................................................................................................ 3
2.6 Field QC Samples ............................................................................................................................... 3
3.0 SEEPS AND SPRINGS SURVEY AND CONTOUR MAP ................................................................. 3
4.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL ..................................................................... .4
4.1 Laboratory Results .............................................................................................................................. 4
4.2 DATA EVALUATION ...................................................................................................................... 4
4.3 Adherence to Sampling Plan and Permit Requirements ..................................................................... 5
4.4 Analyte Completeness Review ........................................................................................................... 5
4.5 Data Validation ................................................................................................................................... 5
4.5 .1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation ..................................................................................................... 5
4.5.2 Holding Time Evaluation ............................................................................................................. 5
4.5.3 Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check ...................................................................................... 5
4.5.4 Analytical Method Check ............................................................................................................ 6
4.5.5 Reporting Limit Evaluation ........................................................................................................... 6
4.5.6 Trip Blank Evaluation .................................................................................................................. 6
4.5.7 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates .................................................................................. 6
4.5.8 Radiologies Counting Error ......................................................................................................... 7
4.5.9 Laboratory Matrix QC Evaluation ............................................................................................... 7
5.0 EVALUATION OF ANALYTICAL DATA .......................................................................................... 8
5.1 Evaluation of Analytical Results ......................................................................................................... 9
5.1.1 RuinSpring .................................................................................................................................. 9
5 .1.2 Cottonwood Spring ...................................................................................................................... 9
5 .1.3 Westwater Seep .............................................................................. ·-· ............................................ 9
5.1.4 Entrance Spring .......................................................................................................................... 10
6.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT ..................................................................................................... 10
6.1 Assessment of Corrective Actions from Previous Period ................................................................. 10
7.0 ELECTRONIC DATA FILES AND FORMAT ................................................................................... 10
8.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION ............................................................................................... 12
ii
Table 1
Table 2A
Table 2B
Table 2C
Table 2D
LIST OF TABLES
Summary of Seeps and Springs Sampling
Detected Constituents and Comparison to Historic Values and Mill Site
Monitoring Wells -Ruin Spring
Detected Constituents and Comparison to Historic Values and Mill Site
Monitoring Wells -Cottonwood Seep
Detected Constituents and Comparison to Historic Values and Mill Site
Monitoring Wells -Westwater Seep
Detected Constituents and Comparison to Historic Values and Mill Site
Monitoring Wells -Entrance Spring
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Seeps and Springs Field Data Sheets and Photographic Documentation
Tab B Field Parameter Measurement Data
Tab C Survey Data and Contour Map
Tab D Analytical Laboratory Data
Tab E Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
E-1 Holding Time Evaluation
E-2 Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check
E-3 Analytical Method Check
E-4 Reporting Limit Evaluation
E-5 Trip Blank Evaluation
E-6 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
E-7 Radiologies Counting Error
E-8 Laboratory Matrix QC Evaluation
Tab F Comma Separated Values Transmittal
111
AWAL
DR
DWMRC
EFRI
GEL
GWQS
LCS
Mill
MS
MSD
Permit
QA
QAP
QC
RPD
TDS
voes
ACRONYM LIST
American West Analytical Laboratory
Dry Ridge Piezometers
Utah Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
GEL Laboratories, Inc.
Groundwater Quality Standard
Laboratory Control Spike
White Mesa Mill
Matrix Spike
Matrix Spike Duplicate
State of Utah Groundwater Discharge Permit No. UGW370004
Quality Assurance
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan
Quality Control
Relative Percent Difference
Total Dissolved Solids
Volatile Organic Compounds
iv
ANNUAL SEEPS AND SPRINGS SAMPLING REPORT
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This is the 2019 Annual Seeps and Springs Sampling Report for the Energy Fuels Resources
(USA) Inc. ("EFRI") White Mesa Mill (the "Mill"), as required under Part I.F.7 of the Mill's
State of Utah Groundwater Discharge Permit No. UGW370004 (the "Permit") and the Mill's
Sampling and Analysis Plan for Seeps and Springs, Revision: 2, July 8, 2016 (the "Sampling
Plan").
The Sampling Plan for Seeps and Springs was revised in July 2016 to incorporate changes
requested by the Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control ("DWMRC"). The
Sampling Plan for Seeps and Springs, Revision: 2, July 8, 2016 was approved by DWMRC by
letter dated August 8, 2016.
2.0 SAMPLING EVENTS
Seeps and springs which were identified near the Mill in the 1978 Environmental Report (Plate
2.6-10, Dames and Moore, January 30, 1978) are to be sampled annually in accordance with the
Sampling Plan and Part 1.E.6 of the Permit. The Sampling Plan specifies the following sample
locations: Corral Canyon Seep, Corral Springs, Ruin Spring, Cottonwood Seep, Westwater Seep
and Entrance Spring (also referred to as Entrance Seep).
2.1 March 2019 Sampling
In accordance with the DWMRC-approved Sampling Plan, once per calendar quarter, Westwater Seep,
Corral Canyon Seep and Corral Springs are visited to determine if there is any water for sampling. If
sufficient water is present, a sample is collected and no further visits are completed for the year.
Westwater Seep, Corral Canyon Seep and Corral Springs were visited on March 20, 2019. No water was
present for sampling during the March 20, 2019 site visit. On March 27, water was noted at Westwater
seep and a sample was collected. Per the DWMRC-approved Sampling Plan, no further visits were
made to Westwater seep in 2019.
2.2 June 2019 Sampling
In accordance with the Permit and the Sampling Plan, DWMRC was notified of the sampling.
The DWMRC representative was present for this sampling event. On June 11, 2019, EFRI
collected seeps and springs samples from Cottonwood Seep, Ruin Spring, Entrance Seep, and
Back Spring (duplicate of Ruin Spring). The DWMRC representative collected a "split" sample
on June 11, 2019 from the EFRI sampling equipment, using sample containers he provided.
Corral Canyon Seep and Corral Springs were dry throughout 2019.
2.3 Repeat Visits to Dry Seeps and Springs.
The initial 2019 visit of Corral Canyon Seep and Corral Springs, was conducted in March 2019.
Corral Canyon Seep and Corral Springs, were dry during the March 2019 visit, could not be
sampled, and did not warrant development attempts with limited hand tool excavation at that
time. During the June 11, 2019 sampling event, Corral Canyon Seep and Corral Springs were
dry, could not be sampled, and did not warrant development attempts with limited hand tool
excavation at that time. Additional visits were made to Corral Canyon Seep and Corral Springs
in August 2019 and October 2019. The additional two visits to Corral Canyon Seep and Corral
Springs did not indicate any changes; i.e., there was no indication that development attempts
would be successful. As previously noted, a sample was collected from Westwater Seep on on
March 27, 2019 because water was present. The data from the March and June sampling events
are included as Attachment D in this report.
2.4 Sampling Procedures
Samples were collected and analyzed for the parameters listed in Table 2 of the Permit.
Samples were collected from the locations indicated in Table 1. Sampling procedures for each
seep or spring are determined by the site location and access.
The DWMRC-approved sampling procedures for seeps and springs at the Mill are contained in
the Sampling Plan. Samples collected under this plan were collected either by direct collection
which involves collecting the sample directly into the sample container from the surface water
feature or from spring out-flow, or by using a stainless steel ladle to collect water until a
sufficient volume is contained in the ladle for transfer to the sample bottle. Filtered parameters
are pumped through a 0.45 micron filter prior to delivery to the sample bottle.
Ruin Spring
In the case of Ruin Spring, sample bottles for the analytes collected during the June sampling
event (except gross alpha and heavy metals) were filled directly from the spring out-flow which
is a pipe. Samples for heavy metals and gross alpha were collected by means of a peristaltic
pump and delivered directly to the sample containers through a 0.45 micron filter. The
appropriate preservatives for the analytical technique were added to the samples.
Westwater Seep
For Westwater Seep, all of the sample containers were filled by means of a peristaltic pump and
delivered directly to the sample containers. Samples for heavy metals and gross alpha were
collected by means of a peristaltic pump and delivered directly to the sample containers through
a 0.45 micron filter. The appropriate preservatives for the analytical technique were added to the
samples.
Cottonwood Seep and Entrance Spring
Cottonwood Seep and Entrance Spring were "developed" prior to the sampling event by Field
Personnel. Development was completed by removing surrounding vegetation and clearing the
sampling location in the spring or seep area. The sample containers were filled by means of a
peristaltic pump and delivered directly to the sample containers. In the case of the samples for
heavy metals and gross alpha, the samples were delivered by a peristaltic pump directly to the
2
sample containers through a 0.45 micron filter. The samples were preserved by the addition of
the appropriate preservative for the analytical technique.
The tubing on the peristaltic pump that comes into contact with the sample water was disposed of
between each sampling. As a result, no equipment required decontamination, and no rinsate
samples were collected.
2.5 Field Data
Attached under Tab A are copies of the field data sheets recorded in association with the June
and October seeps and springs monitoring events. Photographic documentation of the sampling
sites is also included in Tab A. Sampling dates are listed in Table 1 and field parameters
collected during the sampling program are included in Tab B.
2.6 Field QC Samples
The field Quality Control ("QC") samples generated during this sampling event included one
duplicate per sampling event and one trip blank per shipment to each laboratory which received
samples for VOCs. The duplicate samples (Back Spring) were submitted blind to the analytical
laboratory. As previously stated, no rinsate blanks were collected during this sampling event as
only disposable equipment was used for sample collection.
3.0 SEEPS AND SPRINGS SURVEY AND CONTOUR MAP
Part I.F.7(c) of the Permit requires that a water table contour map that includes the elevations for
each well at the facility and the elevations of the phreatic surfaces observed for each of the seeps
and springs sampled be submitted with this annual report. Tab C includes two contour maps.
The contour map labeled C-1 shows the water table without the water level data associated with
the dry ridge ("DR") investigation piezometers. The contour map labeled C-2 shows the water
table with the water level data associated with the DR investigation piezometers. It is important
to note that Cottonwood Seep is not included in any of the perched water level contouring,
because there is no evidence to establish a hydraulic connection between Cottonwood Seep and
the perched water system. Cottonwood Seep is located near the Brushy Basin
Member/Westwater Canyon Member contact, approximately 230 feet below the base of the
perched water system defined by the Burro Canyon Formation/Brushy Basin Member contact.
The stratigraphic position of Cottonwood Seep indicates that its elevation is not representative of
the perched potentiometric surface. Exclusion of the Cottonwood Seep from water level
contouring is consistent with previous submissions. The contour map includes the corrected
survey data from December 2009 as discussed below.
Part I.F.7 (g) of the Permit requires that survey data for the seeps and springs be collected prior
to the collection of samples. DRC previously clarified that the requirement to submit survey data
applies only to the first sampling event and not on an annual basis. The December 2009 and July
2010 seeps and springs survey data shown in Tab C will be used for reporting where seeps and
springs locations and elevations are relevant.
3
A full discussion of the survey data and the hydrogeology of seeps and springs at the margins of
White Mesa in the vicinity of the Mill and the relationship of these seeps and springs to the
hydrogeology of the site, in particular to the occurrence of a relatively shallow perched
groundwater zone beneath the site, is contained in Hydrogeology of the Perched Groundwater
Zone and Associated Seeps and Springs Near the White Mesa Uranium Mill Site, dated
November 12, 2010, prepared by Hydro Geo Chem, Inc. and submitted to the Director on
November 15, 2010. Additional information is also contained in the Second Revision
Hydrogeology of the Perched Groundwater Zone in the Area Southwest of the Tailings Cells
White Mesa Mill Site, dated November 7, 2012, prepared by Hydro Geo Chem, Inc. and
submitted to the Director on November 7, 2012.
4.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL
4.1 Laboratory Results
Analytical results are provided by the Mill's two contract analytical laboratories GEL
Laboratories, Inc., ("GEL") and American West Analytical Laboratory ("AW AL").
The laboratories utilized during this investigation were certified under the Environmental Lab
Certification Program administered by UDEQ Bureau of Lab Improvement for the analyses they
completed.
The analytical data as well as the laboratory Quality Assurance ("QA")/QC summaries are
included under Tab D.
4.2 DATA EVALUATION
The Permit requires that the annual seeps and springs sampling program be conducted in
compliance with the requirements specified in the Mill's approved White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan ("QAP"), the approved Sampling Plan and the
Permit. To meet this requirement, the data validation completed for the seeps and springs
sampling program verified that the program met the requirements outlined in the QAP, the
Permit and the approved Sampling Plan. The Mill QA Manager performed a QA/QC review to
confirm compliance of the monitoring program with requirements of the Permit and the QAP.
As required in the QAP, data QA includes preparation and analysis of QC samples in the field,
review of field procedures, an analyte completeness review, and quality control review of
laboratory data methods and data. Identification of field QC samples collected and analyzed is
provided in Section 4.5.1. Discussion of adherence to the Sampling Plan is provided in Section
4.3. Analytical completeness review results are provided in Section 4.4. The steps and tests
applied to check laboratory data QA/QC are discussed in Sections 4.5.1 through 4.5.9 below.
The analytical laboratories have provided summary reports of the analytical QA/QC
measurements necessary to maintain conformance with National Environmental Laboratory
Accreditation Conference certification and reporting protocol. The analytical laboratory QA/QC
Summary Reports, including copies of the Mill's Chain of Custody and Analytical Request
Record forms for each set of analytical results, follow the analytical results under Tab D. Results
4
of the review of the laboratory QA/QC information are provided under Tab E and discussed in
Section 4.5 below.
4.3 Adherence to Sampling Plan and Permit Requirements
On a review of adherence by Mill personnel to the Permit, the QA Manager observed that
QA/QC requirements established in the Permit and the QAP were met and that the requirements
were implemented as required except, as noted below.
The Permit only requires the measurement of the field parameters pH, conductivity and
temperature. Field parameter measurements collected during this sampling event included pH,
conductivity, temperature, redox potential, and turbidity.
4.4 Analyte Completeness Review
The analyses required by the Permit Table 2 were completed.
4.5 Data Validation
The QAP and the Permit identify the data validation steps and data quality control checks
required for the seeps and springs monitoring program. Consistent with these requirements, the
QA Manager performed the following evaluations: a field data QA/QC evaluation, a receipt
temperature check, a holding time check, an analytical method check, a reporting limit check, a
trip blank check, a QA/QC evaluation of sample duplicates, a gross alpha counting error
evaluation and a review of each laboratory's reported QA/QC information. Each evaluation is
discussed in the following sections. Data check tables indicating the results of each test are
provided under Tab E.
4.5.1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation
The QA Manager performs a review of field recorded parameters to assess their adherence with
QAP and Permit requirements. The assessment involved review of the Field Data sheets. Review
of the Field Data Sheets noted that the requirements for field data collection were met.
4.5.2 Holding Time Evaluation
QAP Table 1 identifies the method holding times for each suite of parameters. Sample holding
time checks are provided under Tab E. The samples were received and analyzed within the
required holding time.
4.5.3 Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check
Chain of Custody sheets were reviewed to confirm compliance with the sample receipt
requirements specified in the QAP. Sample receipt temperature checks are provided under Tab
E. The samples were received within the QAP required temperature limit.
5
4.5.4 Analytical Method Check
The analytical methods reported by both laboratories were checked against the required methods
specified in Table 1 of the QAP. Analytical method check results are provided in Tab E.
4.5.5 Reporting Limit Evaluation
Reporting limits utilized by the laboratory were required to be equal to or lower than the GWQSs
set out in Table 2 of the Permit. For Total Dissolved Solids ("TDS"), sulfate and chloride, for
which Ground Water Quality Standards are not set out in Table 2 of the Permit, reporting limits
specified in Part 1.E.6.e).(l) were used. Those reporting limits are 10 mg/L for TDS, and 1 mg/L
for Sulfate and Chloride. The analytical method reporting limits reported by both laboratories
were checked against the reporting limits specified in the Permit. Reporting limit evaluations are
provided in Tab E. All analytes were measured and reported to the required reporting limits
except the sample results that had the reporting limit raised due to sample dilution necessary to
accommodate the analyte concentrations in the samples. In all cases the reported value for the
analyte was higher than the increased detection limit.
4.5.6 Trip Blank Evaluation
The trip blank results were reviewed to identify any blank contamination. Trip blank evaluation
is provided in Tab E. The trip blank results associated with the samples were less than reporting
limit for the voes.
4.5. 7 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
Section 9 .1.4 a) of the QAP states that the Relative Percent Difference ("RPD") will be
calculated for the comparison of duplicate and original field samples. The QAP acceptance limits
for RPDs between the duplicate and original field sample is less than or equal to 20% unless the
measured results (described as activities in the QAP) are less than 5 times the required detection
limit. This standard is based on the United Stated Environmental Protection Agency Contract
Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review, February 1994,
9240.1-05-01 as cited in the QAP. The RPDs are calculated for duplicate pairs for the anal ytes
regardless of whether or not the reported concentrations are greater than 5 times the required
detection limits; however, data will be considered noncompliant only when the results are greater
than 5 times the required detection limit and the RPO is greater than 20%. RPDs are also only
calculated when both the sample and the duplicate report a detection for any given analyte. If
only one of the pair reports a detection, the RPD cannot be calculated. The additional duplicate
information is provided for information purposes.
All duplicate results were within 20% RPD except for magnesium in the duplicate pair Ruin
Spring/Back Spring. The magnesium RPD was greater than 20%, however the sample and
duplicate results reported for Ruin Spring/Back Spring were not five times greater than the RLs,
and, as such, the deviation from the 20% RPD requirement is acceptable.
The duplicate evaluation is provided in Tab E.
6
4.5.8 Radiologies Counting Error
Section 9.14 of the QAP requires that all gross alpha analysis reported with an activity equal to
or greater than the Groundwater Compliance Limits set out in the Permit (for the seeps and
springs samples the Groundwater Quality Standards ["GWQS"] will be used), shall have a
counting variance that is equal to or less than 20% of the reported activity concentration. An
error term may be greater than 20% of the reported activity concentration when the sum of the
activity concentration and error term is less than or equal to the GWQS.
Section 9.4 of the QAP also requires a comparability check between the sample and field
duplicate sample results utilizing the formula provided in the text.
All radiological results were reported were within acceptance limits. Results of routine
radiologic sample QC are provided under Tab E.
4.5.9 Laboratory Matrix QC Evaluation
Section 9.2 of the QAP requires that the laboratory's QA/QC Manager check the following items
in developing data reports: (1) sample preparation information is correct and complete, (2)
analysis information is correct and complete, (3) appropriate analytical laboratory procedures are
followed, (4) analytical results are correct and complete, (5) QC samples are within established
control limits, (6) blanks are within QC limits, (7) special sample preparation and analytical
requirements have been met, and (8) documentation is complete. In addition to other laboratory
checks described above, EFRI's QA Manager rechecks QC samples and blanks (items (5) and
(6)) to confirm that the percent recovery for spikes and the relative percent difference for spike
duplicates are within the method-specific required limits, or that the case narrative sufficiently
explains any deviation from these limits. Results of this quantitative check are provided under
Tab E. The lab QA/QC results from both GEL and AW AL met these requirements except as
described below.
A number of the seeps and springs samples had the reporting limit raised due to matrix
interference and/or sample dilution. In all cases where the detection limit was increased, the
concentration for the analyte was higher than the increased detection limit.
The check samples included at least the following: a method blank, a laboratory control spike
("LCS"), a matrix spike ("MS") and a matrix spike duplicate ("MSD"), or the equivalent, where
applicable. It should be noted that:
• Laboratory fortified blanks are equivalent to LCSs.
• Laboratory reagent blanks are equivalent to method blanks.
• Post digestion spikes are equivalent to MSs.
• Post digestion spike duplicates are equivalent to MSDs.
• For method E900.1, used to determine gross alpha, a sample duplicate was used instead
ofaMSD.
7
The qualifiers, and the corresponding explanations reported in the QA/QC Summary Reports for
any of the check samples for any of the analytical methods, were reviewed by the QA Manager.
The QAP Section 8.1.2 requires that a MS/MSD pair be analyzed with each analytical batch.
The QAP does not specify acceptance limits for the MS/MSD pair, and the QAP does not specify
that the MS/MSD pair be prepared on EFRI samples only. Acceptance limits for MS/MSDs are
set by the laboratories. The review of the information provided by the laboratories in the data
packages verified that the QAP requirement to analyze a MS/MSD pair with each analytical
batch was met. While the QAP does not require it, the recoveries were reviewed for compliance
with each laboratory's established acceptance limits. The QAP does not require this level of
review and the results of this review are provided for information only.
The information from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports indicates that the MS/MSD
recoveries and the associated RPDs for the seeps and springs samples were within acceptable
laboratory limits except as noted in Tab E. The MS/MSD recoveries that were outside the
laboratory established acceptance limits do not affect the quality or usability of the data, because
the recoveries and RPDs above or below the acceptance limits are indicative of matrix
interference most likely caused by other constituents in the samples. Matrix interferences are
applicable to the individual sample results only. The requirement in the QAPs to analyze a
MS/MSD pair with each analytical batch was met and as such the data are compliant with the
QAP.
The QAP specifies that surrogate compounds shall be employed for all organic analyses, but the
QAP does not specify acceptance limits for surrogate recoveries. The analytical data associated
with the routine quarterly sampling met the requirement specified in the QAP. The information
from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports indicates that the surrogate recoveries for the
seeps and springs samples were within acceptable laboratory limits for all surrogate compounds.
The QAP Section 8.1.2 requires that each analytical batch shall be accompanied by a reagent
blank. Contamination detected in analysis of reagent blanks/method blanks will be used to
evaluate any analytical laboratory contamination of environmental samples. The QAP specified
process for evaluation of reagent/method blanks states that nonconformance will exist when
blanks are within an order of magnitude of the sample results. The information from the
Laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports indicates that the reagent (method) blanks for the seeps
and springs samples were non-detect and were therefore within the acceptance criteria specified
in the QAP.
Laboratory duplicates are completed by the analytical laboratories as required by the analytical
method specifications. Acceptance limits for laboratory duplicates are set by the laboratories.
The QAP does not require the completion of laboratory duplicates or the completion of a QA
assessment of them. EFRI reviews the QC data provided by the laboratories for completeness
and to assess the overall quality of the data provided. Laboratory duplicate results are provided
in Tab D.
5.0 EVALUATION OF ANALYTICAL DATA
8
As previously stated, the samples were analyzed for the groundwater compliance parameters
found on Table 2 of the Permit. In addition to these laboratory parameters, the pH, temperature,
conductivity, (and although not required, redox and turbidity) were measured and recorded in the
field.
5.1 Evaluation of Analytical Results
The results of the March and June sampling events shows no evidence of Mill influence in the
water produced by the seeps and springs sampled. The lack of Mill influence on seeps and
springs is indicated by the fact that the parameters detected are within the ranges of
concentrations for the on-site monitoring wells and for available historic data for the seeps and
springs themselves. For those detected analytes, concentrations are shown in Tables 2A, 2B, 2C,
and 2D. The data are compared to available historic data for each seep and spring as well as to
on-site monitoring well data. Specific discussions about each seep or spring are included below.
5.1.1 Ruin Spring
No VOCs or radiologies were detected. Metals and major ions were the only analytes detected.
The metals detections were minimal with only molybdenum, selenium and uranium having
positive detections. A comparison of the 2009 through 2018 data to the 2019 data shows that the
concentrations of most detected analytes remained approximately the same with only minor
changes within the limits of normal analytical deviation. The reported values for calcium,
fluoride, magnesium, nitrate, and molybdenum, increased from the 2018 sample results, but they
are below the upper range of historic background values (where available) for the on-site
monitoring wells. The differences are not significant and are most likely due to normal
fluctuations due to flow rates or seasonal variations due to annual precipitation. Overall, the data
reported for Ruin Spring are typical for a surface water sample with no indication of Mill
influence.
5.1.2 Cottonwood Spring
No VOCs or radiologies were detected. Metals and major ions were the only analytes detected.
The metals detections were minimal with only uranium having a positive detection. A
comparison of the 2009 through 2018 data to the 2019 data shows that the concentrations of most
detected analytes remained approximately the same with only minor changes within the limits of
normal analytical deviation. The reported values for bicarbonate, calcium, magnesium,
potassium, and sodium increased from the 2018 sample results, but they are below the upper
range of historic background values (where available) for the on-site monitoring wells. The
differences are not significant and are most likely due to normal fluctuations due to flow rates or
seasonal variations due to annual precipitation. Overall, the data reported for Cottonwood
Spring are typical for a surface water sample with no indication of Mill influence.
5.1.3 Westwater Seep
No radiologies or VOCs were detected. Metals and major ions were detected. The metals
detections were minimal with only manganese, and uranium having positive detections. A
comparison of the historic data to the 2019 data shows that the concentrations of most detected
9
analytes remained approximately the same with only minor changes within the limits of normal
analytical deviation. The reported values for bicarbonate, chloride, potassium, and manganese
increased from the 2018 sample results, but they are below the upper range of historic
background values (where available) for the on-site monitoring wells. The differences are not
significant and are most likely due to normal fluctuations due to flow rates or seasonal variations
due to annual precipitation. Overall, the data reported for Westwater Seep are typical for a
surface water sample with no indication of Mill influence.
5.1.4 Entrance Spring
Gross Alpha, toluene, metals, and major ions were the only analytes detected. The metals
detections were minimal with only arsenic, iron, manganese, molybdenum and uranium having
positive detections. A comparison of the 2009 through 2018 data to the 2019 data shows that the
concentrations of most detected analytes remained approximately the same with only minor
changes within the limits of normal analytical deviation. The reported values for bicarbonate,
calcium, chloride, fluoride, magnesium, ammonia, potassium, sodium and total dissolved solids
("TDS") increased from the 2018 sample results. The detected concentrations are below the
upper range of historic background values (were available) for the on-site monitoring wells. The
differences are not significant and are most likely due to normal fluctuations due to flow rates or
seasonal variations due to annual precipitation. In addition, the presence of livestock and
livestock feces has likely affected the analytical results. Overall, the data reported for Entrance
Spring are typical for a surface water sample with no indication of Mill influence.
6.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT
No corrective action reports are required for the 2019 annual sampling event.
6.1 Assessment of Corrective Actions from Previous Period
No corrective action reports were required for the 2018 annual sampling event.
7.0 ELECTRONIC DATA FILES AND FORMAT
EFRI has provided to the Director electronic copies of the laboratory results as part of the annual
seeps and springs monitoring in Comma Separated Values, from the laboratory. A copy of the
transmittal e-mail is included under Tab F.
10
11
8.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION
This document was prepared by Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
By:
Scott A. Bakken
Senior Director Regulatory Affairs
12
Certification
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel
properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or
persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,
and c'omplete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.
~b~~ .....
Scott A. Bakken
Senior Director, Regulatory Affairs
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
13
Tables
Table 1: Summary of Seeps and Springs Sampling
Work Order -
Location Sample Date No.lLab Set ID Dare of Lab Report
Cottonwood Spring 6/11/2019 AWAL = 1906343 AWAL = 7/05/2019
GEL= 481772 GEL= 7/10/2019
Entrance Seep 6/11/2019 AWAL = 1906343 AWAL = 7/05/2019
GEL= 481772 GEL= 7/10/2019
Back Spring (Duplicate of 6/11/2019 AW AL= 1906343 AWAL = 7/05/2019
Ruin Spring) GEL= 481772 GEL= 7/10/2019
Ruin Spring 6/11/2019 AW AL= 1906343 AW AL= 7/05/2019
GEL= 481772 GEL= 7/10/2019
Corral Spring Not Sampled -Dry Not Sampled -Dry Not Sampled -Dry
Corral Canyon Seep Not Sampled -Dry Not Sampled-Dry Not Sampled-Dry
Westwater Seep 3/27/2019 AWAL= 1903737 AWAL = 04/11/2019
GEL =475027 GEL = 04/26/2019
Notes: Multiple dates shown for a single laboratory depict resubmission dates for the data.
Resubmissions were required to correct reporting errors. When multiple dates are shown for a
single laboratory, the final submission date is shown in italics.
Table 2A Detected Constituents and Comparison to Historic Values and Mill Site Monitoring Wells
-. Ruin Spring . --. ---. : Range of
Average
2011 2011 2018 Historic Avg2003
Constituent 2009 2010 May July 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2019 Values for 20042
: Monitoring
Wells 1 * -.. ··---.. --.. -
Major Ions (mg/I) .
Carbonate <l <l <l l <1 <l <l <1 <1 <l <l <l " ---
Bicarbonate 233 254 241 239 237 208 204 200 193 208 202 202 ~ : --
Calcium 151 136 145 148 147 149 150 162 138 145 158 165 --
Chloride 28 23 25 44 28 26.3 27.1 27.4 24.4 27.4 29.9 23.9 ND-213 27
Fluoride 0.5 0.53 0.45 0.5 0.52 0.538 <1 0.445 0.541 0.5 0.414 0.505 ND-1.3 0.6
Magnesium 32.3 29.7 30.6 31.1 31.9 32.1 35.4 31.8 31.1 30.2 33.9 45.6 ---
Nitrogen-Ammonia 0.09 <0.05 ND <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 --:;_ I
Nitrogen-Nitrate 1.4 1.7 1.7 1.6 l.6 1.56 1.54 1.31 1.64 1.55 1.35 1.56 ---.
Potassium 3.3 3.07 3.2 3.3 3.5 3.46 3.24 3.14 3.18 3.07 3.58 3.31 ··-· -..
. --· Sodium 104 93.4 110 111 115 118 119 126 105 113 128 128 ---
Sulfate 528 447 486 484 464 553 553 528 490 476 547 474 ND-3455 521
TDS 1010 903 942 905 1000 952 984 1000 916 972 1000 900 1019-5548 1053
Metals (ug/1)
Arsenic <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 --;-
Beryllium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 -..
Cadmium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ND -4.78 0.01
Chromium <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 --
Cobalt <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 ' ---.
Copper <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 ---
Iron <30 <30 <30 <30 <30 <30 <30 <30 <30 <30 <30 <30 ND-7942 25
Lead <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 ----
Manganese <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 ND-34,550 5
Mercury <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.S <0.S <0.5 <0.S <0.5 <0.S <0.S <0.5 <0.S ----
Molybdenum 17 17 16 17 16 16.1 16.0 18.3 17.8 17.2 18 20.2 ---
Nickel <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 ND-61 0.05
Table 2A Detected Constituents and Comparison to Historic Values and Mill Site Monitoring Wells .. Ruin Spring . ---'" ---• -I Range of -I
I Average
Constituent 2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Historic Avg 2003
May July Values for 20042
. I Monitoring
Wells 1 * ·-'
Selenium 12.2 10 11.8 10.2 10.8 10.2 12 10 10 10.5 12.2 10.8 ND-106.5 12.1
Silver <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 -· -
Thallium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ---
Tin <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 -' -
Uranium 9.11 8.47 9.35 8.63 8.68 9.12 9.61 9.03 8.38 8.49 9.35 9.02 ND-59.8 IO
Vanadium <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 ---
Zinc <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 --· --
Radiologies (pCi/1)
Gross Alpha <0.2 <0.2 <-0.3 <-0.05 <-0.09 <1.0 <l <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.57 <1.0 ND-36 0.28
voes (ug/L)
Acetone <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 --
Benzene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 <l.0 ---
Carbon tetrachloride <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <LO <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 ---
Chloroform <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 <1.0 <LO <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 --.. -
Chloromethane <1.0 <1.0 <LO <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 ---
MEK <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 ---
Methylene Chloride <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 --: '•:-·-
Naphthalene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 ----
Tetrahydrofuran <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 --·
Toluene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 --
Xylenes <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 --
1 From Figure 3, Table 10 and Appendix B of the Revised Addendum, Background Groundwater Quality Report: New Wells.for Denison Mines (USA) Corp 's White Mesa Mill Site, San Juan County.
Utah. April 30, 2008, prepared by INTERA, Inc. and Table 16 and Appendix D of the Revised Background Groundwater Quality Report: Existing Wells fc,r Denison Mines (USA) Corp. 's White Mesa
Uranium Mill Site, San Juan County, Utah, October 2007, prepared by INTERA, Inc.
2 From Figure 9 of the Revised Addendum, Evaluation of Available Pre-Operational and Regional Background Data, Background Groundwater Quality Report: Existing Wells.for Denison Mines (USA)
Corp. 's White Mesa Mill Site. San Juan Couinty, Utah, November 16, 2007, prepared by INTERA. Inc.
.
*Range of average historic values for On-Site Monitoring Wells as reported on April 30, 2008 (MW-I, MW-2, MW-3, MW-3A, MW-4, MW-5, MW-I I, MW-12, MW-14, MW-15, MW-17. MW-I 8, MW-
19, MW-20, MW-22, MW-23, MW-24, MW-25, MW-26, MW-27, MW-28, MW-29, MW-30, MW-31 and MW-32)2
Table 2B Detected Constituents and Comparison to Historic Values and Mill Site Monitoring Wells
-Cottonwood Spring .,. . ' ,. . --Range of . ' .
-Average
2011 2011 Historic Avg 1977
Constituent 2009 2010 May July 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Values for 1982 I
Monitoring
I Wells1* . "
. > Major Ions (mg/I) I
Carbonate <1 <1 <1 6 <1 <1 <1 <1 <l <l <1 <1 ---,1 -.... . -Bicarbonate 316 340 330 316 326 280 251 271 256 280 283 286 ---
Calcium 90.3 92.2 95.4 94.2 101 87.9 99.7 Ill 102 99.6 109 122 --
Chloride 124 112 113 134 149 118 128 133 138 129 153 138 ND -213 31
Fluoride 0.4 0.38 0.34 0.38 0.38 0.417 <l 0.318 0.466 0.344 0.282 0.249 ND -1.3 0.8
Magnesium 25 24.8 25 .2 25 .2 27.7 23.6 29.0 27.5 29.5 27.1 30.2 35.3 -., --..
Nitrogen-. ..
<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.0512 <0.05 <0.05 ' <0.05 <0.05 . -..
Ammonia I
Nitrogen-Nitrate 0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.124 0.108 <0.1 , -.--'
Potassium 5.7 5.77 6 5.9 6.2 5.53 6.18 5.91 6.11 5.72 6.35 6.78 -i --
Sodium 205 214 229 227 247 217 227 251 221 213 234 268 --
Sulfate 383 389 394 389 256 403 417 442 443 409 428 423 ND-3455 230
TDS 1010 900 1030 978 1040 996 968 1020 1070 1080 1080 1010 1019-5548 811
. .., Metals (ug/1)
Arsenic <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 -· -·
Beryllium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 -..
Cadmium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ND-4.78 ... .
Chromium <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 ---
Cobalt <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 --· --
Copper <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 ~ <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 ---
Iron <30 <30 53 <30 <30 <30 <30 <30 <30 <30 <30 <30 ND-7942 150
Lead <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -..
Manganese <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 ND-34,550 580
Mercury <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ~ ---
Molybdenum <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 ----
Nickel <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 ND-61 -
Selenium <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 ND -106.5 -
Table 2B Detected Constituents and Comparison to Historic Values and Mill Site Monitoring Wells
-. Cottonwood Spring --. -------. --I I
I Range of
I Average
Constituent 2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Historic Avg 1977
May July Values for 1982 1
I
Monitoring
I Wells1* .. ·-
Silver <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 -.;_ '· . -Thallium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <5 <5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ---
Tin <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 --
Uranium 8.42 8.24 7.87 8.68 8.17 8.95 9.62 9.12 8.84 9.17 10.3 10.1 ND-59.8 --
Vanadium <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 ----
Zinc <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 ---.. -
Radiologies (pCi/1)
Gross Alpha <0.2 <0.2 <0.1 <-0.1 <-0.2 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <LO <1.0 ND-36 7.2
-voes (ug/L)
Acetone <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 -· -
Benzene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 --
Carbon <LO <1.0 <1.0 <LO <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 tetrachloride ---
Chloroform <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 ' ' --.. --
Chloromethane <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 ' -.. . -.
MEK <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 i -.. , .
Methylene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Chloride --,--
Naphthalene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <LO <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 . ---
Tetrahydrofuran <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 ----
Toluene <1.0 <1.0 <LO <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <LO <1.0 <LO I I .. ! -.. Xylenes <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 ' <LO <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 .. I -:
1 From Figure 3, Table IO and Appendix B of the Revised Addendum, Background Groundwater Quality Report: New Wells for Denison Mines (USA ) Corp's White Mesa Mill Site. San Juan
County, Utah , April 30, 2008. prepared by INTERA, Inc. and Table I 6 and Appendix D of the Revised Backxround Groundwater Quality Report: Existinx Wells f or Denison Mines ( USA) Corp. 's
White Mesa Uranium Mill Site. San Juan County, Utah, October 2007, prepared by INTERA, Inc.
*Range of average historic values for On-Site Monitoring Wells as reported on April 30, 2008 (MW-I , MW-2, MW-3, MW-3A. MW-4, MW-5, MW-I I, MW-1 2, MW-14, MW-15, MW-17, MW-
18, MW-19, MW-20, MW-22, MW-23. MW-24. MW-25, MW-26. MW-27, MW-28, MW-29, MW-30, MW-3 land MW-32)
I
Table 2C Detected Constituents and Com_J)_arison to Historic Values and Mill Site Monitoring_ Wells .. Westwater S~p . -. -. ----·----Range of · i I I I Average
Constituent 2009 2010 2011 May 2011 July 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 -2019 Historic
Values for
I --~ • 1-~ --., Monitoring
Wells1 * . ' ---.. ---MajQr Ions (m2'1) --. ------
Carbonate <l <I <l <1 <I <I <l <I -
Bicarbonate 465 450 371 359 399 369 444 450 --Calcium 191 179 247 150 176 125 204 185 -
Chloride 41 40 21 32.6 38.0 27.5 36.2 41.6 ND -213
Fluoride 0.7 0.6 0.54 0.424 0.618 0.574 0.659 0.505 ND-1.3
Magnesium 45.9 44.7 34.7 Not Sampled Not Sampled Not Sampled Not Sampled 34 47.3 31.7 56.6 43.7 -
Nitrogen-Ammonia <0.05 0.5 0.06 Dry Dry Dry Dry 0.123 <0.05 <0.05 0.0832 <0.05 --
Nitrogen-Nitrate 0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 -
Potassium 1.19 6.57 3.9 1.98 2.32 2.33 2.94 3.99 -
Sodium 196 160 112 139 185 133 218 152 -
Sulfate 646 607 354 392 573 318 580 436 ND-3455
TDS 1370 1270 853 896 1060 820 1220 1110 1019 -5548
-Metals (.ue./1) -
Arsenic <5 <5 12.3 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 .-
Beryllium <0.5 <0.5 0.91 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 -
Cadmium <0.5 <0.5 0.9 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ND-4.78
Chromium <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 --Cobalt <10 <IO <IO <IO <10 <10 <10 <10 ----
Copper <10 <10 16 <10 <10 <10 <IO <10 -
Iron 89 56 4540 <30 40.1 181 575 1.20 ND-7942
Lead <1.0 <1.0 41.4 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -
Manganese 37 87 268 171 55.5 144 312 528 ND-34,550
Mercury <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Not Sampled Not Sampled Not Sampled Not Sampled <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Dry Dry Dry Dry -
Molybdenum 29 29 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 -
Nickel <20 <20 29 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 ND-61
Selenium <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 ND-106.5
Silver <10 <IO <IO <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 ---
Thallium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --
Tin <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 --
Uranium 15.1 46.6 6.64 2.1 19.0 5.17 13.2 4.92 NP-59.8
Vanadium <15 <15 34 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 -
Zinc <10 <10 28 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 . --
Table 2C Detected Constituents and Comparison to Historic Values and Mill Site Monitoring_ Wells
-·-------. ---Westwater Seep --Range of
Average
Constituent 2009 2010 2011 May 2011 July 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Historic
Values for
Monitoring
' Wells1 * ---r~ --,J': ------.. '
Radiolc Irie$ (1>Ci/J) ----·· -----
Gross Alpha < -0.1 <0.3 0.5 Not Sampled Not Sampled Not Sampled Not Sampled <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 ND-36 Dry Dry Dry Dry
VOCS{ufdL) ---· ---Acetone <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 23.1 <20 <20 -----
Benzene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -
Carbon tetrachloride <LO <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -
Chloroform <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 --Chloromethane <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -
MEK <20 <20 <20 Not Sampled Not Sampled Not Sampled Not Sampled <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 Dry Dry Dry Dry --
-Methylene Chloride <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 -
Naphthalene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 -,
Tetrahydrofuran <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -
Toluene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -
Xylenes <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 -
From Figure 3, Table IO and Appendix B of the Revised Addendum. Background Groundwater Qua/ii)' Report: New Wells for Denison Mines (USA) Corp 's Whire Mesa Mill Site, San Juan
Counry, Utah, April 30, 2008, prepared by INT ERA, Inc. and Table 16 and Appendix D of the Revised Background Groundwater Quality Report: Existing Wells for Denison Mines ( USA)
Corp. 's White Mesa Uranium Mill Site, San Juan County, Utah, October 2007, prepared by INTERA, Inc.
*Range of average historic values for On-Site Monitoring Wells as reported on April 30, 2008 (MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, MW-3A, MW-4, MW-5, MW-I I, MW-I 2, MW-14, MW-15, MW-17,
MW-18, MW-19, MW-20, MW-22, MW-23, MW-24, MW-25, MW-26, MW-27, MW-28, MW-29, MW-30, MW-31 and MW-32)
Table 20 Detected Constituents and Comparison to Historic Values and Mill Site Monitorin,g Wells
Entrance Spring -.
' ---·. ----. ---. -.. ----..
-I
Range of Average
Constituent 2009 2010 2011 May 2011 July 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Historic Values
for Monitoring
I Wells1*
cl --... -. ---
Major Ions (mg/I) . --
Carbonate <1 <1 <1 7 <l <l <l <l <l <I <I <I I .I ; -l .... "'-_:J \ _,
Bicarbonate 292 332 270 299 298 292 247 324 340 402 236 480 -• -~:ii~ \
Calcium 90.8 96.5 88.8 96.6 105 121 103 131 131 129 116 155
Chloride 60 63 49 64 78 139 76.8 75.6 75 84.6 75.9 104 ND-213
Fluoride 0.7 0.73 0.58 0.58 0.64 0.71 <1 0.606 0.668 0.615 0.454 0.912 ND -1.3
Magnesium 26.6 28.9 26.4 28.4 32.7 43 34.9 33.3 38.6 36.4 42.4 48.0 -
Nitrogen-Ammonia 0.28 <0.05 <0.05 0.32 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.202 0.0962 0.247 0.102 0.168 --:-
Nitrogen-Nitrate 1.4 1 1.4 0.5 2.8 2.06 3.65 <0.1 0.403 <1 2.34 <1 -
Potassium 2.4 2.74 2.6 2.9 2 3.83 1.56 1.62 <1.0 3.88 3.64 4.66 -
Sodium 61.4 62.7 62.5 68.6 77.4 127 78.9 93.1 90.8 90.3 96 126 -
Sulfate 178 179 166 171 171 394 219 210 245 187 243 160 ND-3455
TDS 605 661 571 582 660 828 688 680 828 752 820 892 1019 -5548 -Metals (ug/.1) -
Arsenic <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 5.02 <5 9.16 <5 8.94 " --
Beryllium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --
Cadmium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ND -4.78
Chromium <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 -
Cobalt <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 .. -
Coover <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 ..
Iron <30 <30 37 55 34 162 37.2 295 94.4 371 <30 453 ND-7942
Lead <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -·
Manganese 54 11 47 84 <10 259 16.1 367 210 913 405 587 ND-34,550
Mercury <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --
Molvbdenum <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 14.30 --
Nickel <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 ND-61
Selenium 12.1 9.2 13.1 5.5 13.2 11.2 15.9 <5 <5 <5 15.3 <5 ND -106.5
Silver <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 -
Thallium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 -
Tin <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 -
Uranium 15.2 17.8 18.8 15.3 21.1 38.8 23.2 36 22.0 14.6 27.6 70.1 ND-59.8
Vanadium <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 -.,
Zinc <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 -
Table 20 Detected Constituents and Comparison to Historic Values and Mill Site Monitori ng Wells -.. --Entrance Sptiog .. -----.
-'. -
; I
Range of Average
Historic V aloes
Constituent 2009 2010 2011 May 2011 July 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 for Monitoring
-Wells1*
I ------·-. ---
--Radiologies (pCi/1)
Gross Alpha 0.9 <0.5 I 1.5 1.6 0.5 2.3 <I 3.05 <I 2.53 <1 2.63 ND-36
VOCS{ug/L) '
Acetone <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 --
Benzene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 --
Carbon tetrachloride <1.0 <l.0 <l.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 --
Chloroform <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 --.
Chloromethane <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 ----
MEK <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 -
Methylene Chloride <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -
Naphthalene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -
Tetrahydrofuran <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 <1.0 <l.0 -
Toluene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <LO 1.32 <1.0 <1.0 13.1 <1.0 5.59 --
Xvlenes <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 --
1 From Figure 3, Table l O and Appendix B of the Revised Addendum, Background Groundwater Quality Report: New Wells for Denison Mines ( USA) Corp 's White Mesa Mill Site, San
Juan County, Utah, April 30, 2008, prepared by INTERA, Inc. and Table 16 and Appendix D of the Revised Background Groundwater Quality Report: Existing Wells for Denison Mines
(USA) Corp. 's White Mesa Uranium Mill Site, San Juan County, Utah, October 2007, prepared by INTERA, Inc.
*Range of average historic values for On-Site Monitoring Wells as reported on April 30, 2008 (MW-I, MW-2, MW-3, MW-3A, MW-4, MW-5, MW-I 1, MW-12, MW-14, MW-15, MW-
17, MW-18, MW-19, MW-20, MW-22, MW-23, MW-24, MW-25, MW-26, MW-27, MW-28, MW-29, MW-30, MW-31 and MW-32)
-
':
-
. '
I
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Seeps and Springs Field Data Sheets and Photographic Documentation
Tab B Field Parameter Measurement Data
Tab C Survey Data and Contour Map
Tab D Analytical Laboratory Data
Tab E Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
E-1 Holding Time Evaluation
E-2 Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check
E-3 Analytical Method Check
E-4 Reporting Limit Evaluation
E-5 Trip Blank Evaluation
E-6 QNQC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
E-7 Radiologic Counting Error
E-8 Laboratory Matrix QC Evaluation
Tab F CSV Transmittal
Tab A
Seeps and Springs Field Data Sheets and Photographic Documentation
Field Data Record-Seeps and Springs Sampling
Seep or Spring Location: .....:C:-...o ..... +"'-· ii"""'< ..... )tl ........... L,>, ..... ).._.Q.,_O .... d __ .s"'""pr-,_._1 Q..,_:J=t----------
Date For Initial Sampling Visit: C;,/ 11 / :l O I q Time:_~O_'i.......:S ...... a ______ _
Sample Collected: 111 Yes o No
Date For Second Sampling Visit: ________ Time: _________ _
Sample Collected: o Yes o No
Date For Third Sampling Visit: _______ Time: .. ----------
Sample Collected: o Yes D No
Sampling Personnel: "'-oaer Holl ;d~ , Deea L~~aa , Deoo W,odecs OQ
Weather Conditions at Time of Sampling: __ :;i ..... ,_:1,o ..... a ..... ,..,~------------
Estimated Seep or Spring Flow Rate: • 5 0 0 6-P M --------'~__....__ _______ _
Field Parameter Measurements:
-pH
-Temperature (°C) _---'-t 5.._.,._q.._7 __________ _
-Conductivity µMHOC/cm --i~1-Q~(---------
-Turbidity (NfU) (if measured). ________ _
-Redox Potential Eh (mV) (if measured) _J..t ..... -Z ........... O ___ _
Analytical P.arameters/Sample Collection Method:
Iii Yes oNo oYes mNo D ijll
Metals fiJ Yes oNo Iii Yes oNo D l!l
Nutrients Iii Yes ONo oYes lil No 0 ril
OtherNon WYes i;:iNo oYes ~No D ~ Radiofo ·cs
Gross Alpha l3J Yes oNo Yes oNo D ~
QC Samples Associated with this Location:
o Rinsate Blank
o Duplicate
Duplicate Sample Name: __________ _
D
D
D
D
D
Notes: Accipea aa ~;±c o..+ D4'io So,mpks '-Dlleckd o,.± 0950
wo..±«:c w)a s c: I eo.c.
D
D
0
0
Field Data Record-Seeps and Springs Sampllne
Seep or Spring Location: "F-n+r~n ce Seep
Date For Infdal Sampling Visit: C..,/ 11 / J,O I q
Sample Collected: ij1J Yes p No
Time: 0 'i> IS
Date For Second Sampling Visit: ________ Time: ________ _
Sample Collected: o Yes o No
Date For Third Sampllng Visit: _______ Time: _________ _
Sample Collected: D Yes D No
Sampling Personnel: ~aaec Non;Jt3 I Dee() L~Wlq./)' Dean H,ndec.soq
Weather Condidons at Time of Sampllng:_s~· \A-"--,...-::-j~------------
Esdmated Seep or Spring Flow Rate: wer ! ,)c.. '> llijO o.rd: I f1D \?;.S, b4 l -How
FJeld Parameter Measurements:
-pH
-Temperature (°C) _.........,~~-----------
-Conductivity µMHOC/cm _,_, ~-'-"-';z.....,;: ________ _
-Turbidity (NTU) (ifmeasured) __ fo~3', ..... $._ _____ _
-Redox Potential Eh (mV) (if measured) _:5.__.-, ..... z ____ _
Analytical P.arameters/Sample Collection Method:
Iii Yes oNo DYes o!1 No D ti!! D D
Metals OOYes oNo ~Yes oNo D ~ D D
Nutrients Ill Yes oNo oYes ijJ No D lJI D 0
Other Non ~Yes oNo oYes [)I No D ijl D D Radiofo ·cs
Gross Alpha [ii Yes DNo ~Yes oNo D 11} D D
QC Samples Associated with this Location:
o Rinsate Blank
o Duplicate
Duplicate Sample Name:
Field Data Record-Seeps and Springs Sampling
Seep or Spring Location: ---:.cB ..... tA.___c.k----""_s. ..... • pr-r_i n ............. ji-----------------
Date For Initial Sampling Visit: b / 11 / 2. 0 I q
Sample Collected: ~ Yes o No
Time: 0 850
Date For Second Sampling Visit: ________ Time: _________ _
Sample Collected: o Yes o No
Date For Third Sampling Visit: ________ Time: _________ _
Sample Collected: o Yes o No
Sampling Personnel: ~.;..xO.,...tl...._(l .... eC---'~--'o=H,....; l~~~t-1 ..... D...,,.,;;.o.e .... o ........... L...,,~~{""-W)""'Afl:......;-1-D .... e ..... o ..... o-'--lUJ..l,e,d.01'J.e..!.e..Lc ..... s~o,!./.q.!,.__
Weather Conditions at Time of Sampling: ___ s_· ~"'-o .... o ..... jr-------------
Estimated Seep or Spring Flow Rate: __ ...._J ...... 0...._--G-,__.f ..... t'\'-+----------
Field Parameter Measurements:
-pH
-Temperature (°C) __.1._3 ......... e, ..... C:.___ _________ _
-Conductivity µMHOC/~ __._l~ .......... s·:1-+----------
-Turbidity (NTU) (if measured)~D=---------
-Redox Potential Eh (m V) (if measured) _,3 .... 8 ...... 7 ____ _
Analytical Parameters/Sample Collection Method:
rsnYes oNo oYes 1!1 No
Metals Iii Yes oNo ljl Yes DNo
Nutrients Iii Yes oNo OYes l¥l No
Other Non ~Yes DNo oYes MNo
Radiofo 'cs
Gross Alpha [ii Yes oNo Yes oNo
QC Samples Associated with this Location:
o Rinsate Blank
181 Duplicate
ll!I
D
B:l
Iii
D
D
D
D
Bl
Duplicate Sample Name: ___________ _
D
D
D
D
D
Notes: Ar ri11ea D(\ 5 ,±, a-.± 0$,j () So.mplcs c..olledc:d 0:-± bX{b O
Wo.t«: l,,,)Gi."'> C-leCX::::
D
D
D
D
Field Data Record-Seeps and Springs Sampli.n.&
Seep or Spring Location: -'-'R=-=u..-=;-'-'i\_S--+p_r_; "-:~:::r-------------
Date For Initial Sampling Visit: (,.._./ 11 /:J., 0 I q Time: 085D . __,......,.......: _____ _
Sample Collected: ~ Yes o No
Date For Second Sampling Visit: Time: ---------
Sample Collected: o Yes D No t,
Date For Third Sampling Visit: Time: ---------
Sample Collected: D Yes o No
Sampling Personnel: ---r;_ooer ~on ;J't3 , Deeo L~t11) , Deao ~endec.s.oq
~eather Conditions at Time of Samplin.g: 5 ..... (\"1-
Estimated Seep or Spring Flow Rate: ___.}-'-. =O_ ..... (,: ..... P_.9b1___._ __________ _
Field Parameter Measurements:
-pH 7, i.iO
-Temperature (°C) __ 1~---'''-=<..=~'-----------
-Conductivity µMHOC/cm ~l?..~5 -'1 _______ _
-Turbidity (NTU) (if measured) ___ ...___ ___ 9
___ _
-Redox Potential Eh (mV) (if measured) _3"-&'"""'"'----
Analytical Parameters/Sample Collection Method:
voes Iii Yes oNo oYes 111 No ti 0 D D
Metals Iii Yes oNo Iii Yes DNo D Ill D D
Nutrients 111 Yes oNo oYes ljl No ii 0 D 0
OtherNon ~Yes oNo oYes Iii No ~ D D D
Radiolo ·cs
Gross Alpha !:ii Yes oNo ~Yes oNo D Ci!I D D
QC Samples Associated with this Location: ~ .
o Rinsate Blank ,.
o Duplicate
Duplicate Sample Name: __________ _
Notes: Acd\)ea DQ s;+, d-0 kjo So..mpks (..olleded o± o gso
Wo..±ec luci.5 Glel).[.
Field Data Record-Seeps and Springs Sampling
Seep or Spring Location: LJe~+4)<X.+er S~~p
Date For Initial Sampling Visit: 3 /f)..l) /~D I'\
Sample Collected: D Yes !J No
Date For Second Sampling Visit: 3 /:;_7 /;2.01'1
Sample Collected: WY es o No
Time: 0913
Time: 0 q3Q
Date For Third Sampling Visit: _______ Time: ________ _
Sample Collected: o Yes o No
SamplingPersonnel: ~MCI""' Uoll i'kj I Do-n L~r1c..n
Weather Conditions at Time of Sampling:__,,e,c...l'""'c, ...... v .... J:j .... ~-----------
Estimated Seep or Spring Flow Rate: Lou ~I ow . -~~~~------------
Field Parameter Measurements:
-pH
-Temperature (°C) __.l ...... l ....... 7 ...... 2. _________ _
-Conductivity µMHOC/cm _l ..... '1 ..... ;1..-=5<....._ _______ _
-Turbidity (NTU) (if measured)__.._,.,..:.....,.,_ ______ _
-Redox Potential Eh (mV) (if measured) ,3$S ~ ----
Analytical Parameten/Sample Collection Method:
voes MYes DNo oYes Q9 No D L!I
Metals ~Yes ONo i;g Yes DNo D Bl
Nutrients Bl Yes DNo oYes Bl No D Bl
Other Non ~Yes oNo DYes Ii No D ~
Radiolo cs
Gross Alpha BJ Yes oNo !JI Yes DNo D IY1
QC Samples Associated with this Location:
o Rinsate Blank
o Duplicate
Duplicate Sample Name:
Notes: Arri\lcd on ~i'tc ~+ 09:i.s s .. Mf>lt'.'C, c:olledeJ
p;d·ul"(. t..)<t:<:, + Gt \C C,l'I • Lc:£:1 s.; ..... o.+ O'f 'iO .
D D
D D
D D
D D
D D
"'+ D9.3D .
(
Field Data Record~Seeps and Springs Sampling
Seep or Spring Location: C. oro-. \ {,C\O ~on Seep
G. \ Date For Initial Sampling Visit: 3/2-,0 /2-[) !q Time: __ Q~9_L.j..._fo ____ _
Sample Collected: o Yes ~ No
G.::2.._ Date For Second Sampling Visit: b / 11 / 2,() IC\ Time: l.?...3 i
Sample Collected: o Yes 1iJ No
G(3 Date For Third Sampling Visit: g, / r I ~O 19 Time: }M :S
Sample Collected: o Yes ~ No
Sampling Personnel:
Weather Conditions at Time of Sampling: ----------------
Estimated Seep or Spring Flow Rate: -----------------
Field Parameter Measurements:
-pH
-Temperature (°C) ______________ _
-Conductivity µMHOC/cm ___________ _
-Turbidity (NTU) (if measured) _________ _
-Redox Potential Eh (mV) (if measured) ______ _
Analytical Parameters/Sample Collection Method:
Parameter , Sample Taken Filtered II ,SaJlipling M"lhojJ,
I
Direct 11 Peristaltic 'Ladle Other
'
11 ,, Pump ( describe in
anotes section)
voes oYes oNo o Yes ONo D D 0 D
Metals oYes oNo oYes oNo 0 D 0 D
Nutrients oYes oNo oYes oNo D 0 0 0
Other Non oYes oNo oYes oNo D D D D
Radiologies
Gross Alpha oYes oNo oYes oNo D 0 0 0
QC Samples Associated with this Location:
o Rinsate Blank
o Duplicate
Duplicate Sample Name: __________ _
Notes: Gr-\ pi(. 1,.)~S,, ±<)\ken ,j-08 .SY'
Field Data Record-Seeps and Springs Sampling
Seep or Spring Location: _ .. C~o~CC~P..~/ ~.S~p~r-~Qg--1.---------------
Q l Date For Initial Sampling Visit: 3,/ :LOI AA l~
Sample CoJlected: D Yes ~ No
Qd... Date For Second Sampling Visit: C, /t l /2.019
Sample Collected: D Yes ~ No
Q3 Date For Third Sampling Visit: g/ 7/:)..01q
Sample Collected: o Yes lWNo
Sampling Personnel:
Time: 0·933
Time: I Z 1 t-/
Time: t;LD1
Weather Conditions at Time of Sampling: ______________ _
Estimated Seep or Spring Flow Rate: -----------------
Field Parameter Measurements:
-pH
-Temperature (°C) _____________ _
-Conductivity µMHOC/cm -----------
-Turbidity (NTU) (if measured) -----------Redo x Potential Eh (m V) (if measured) ______ _
Analytical Parameters/Sample Collection Method:
voes DYes DNo oYes DNo D D
Metals oYes oNo oYes oNo D D
Nutrients DYes DNo oYes DNo D D
Other Non oYes DNo oYes oNo D D
Radiolo ·cs
Gross Alpha DYes DNo oYes DNo D D
QC Samples Associated with this Location:
o Rinsate Blank
o Duplicate
Duplicate Sample Name:
D
D
D
D
D
Notes: QL{ ' +"' Uen °'-t o ~~O . ~ ~ ~a&Jrd· f?ll:.';:;, S cp r'"j
D
D
D
D
D
TabB
Field Parameter Measurement Data
Field parameter . Date
Location Saml)led pH C_onductivity Turbidity Redox Temperature
Cottonwood Spring 6/11/2019 7.09 1701 0 470 15.97
Entrance Seep 6/11/2019 7.09 1425 63.8 517 14.02
Back Spring
(Duplicate of Ruin
Spring) 6/11/2019 7.40 1254 0 387 13.66
Ruin Spring 6/11/2019 7.40 1254 0 387 13.66
Westwater Seep 3/27/2019 7.14 1628 11.7 355 11.72
TabC
Survey Data and Contour Map
Seeps and Springs Survey Locations
Mid-December 2009 Survey
Location Latitude (N) Longitude (W) Elevation
FROG POND 37°33'03.5358" 109°29'04.9552" 5589.56
CORRAL CANYON 37°33'07.1392" 109°29'12.3907" 5623.97
ENTRANCE SPRING 37°32'01.6487" 109°29'33.7005" 5559.71
CORRAL SPRINGS 37°29'37.9192" 109°29'35.8201" 5383.35
RUIN SPRING 37°30'06.0448" 109°31'23.4300" 5380.03
COTTONWOOD 37°3 l '21.7002" 109°32'14.7923" 5234.33
WESTWATER 37°31'58.5020" 109°31 '25.7345" 5468.23
Verification Survey July 2010
RUIN SPRING 37°30'06.0456" 109°31 '23.4181" 5380.01
COTTONWOOD 37°3 l '21.6987" 109°32'14.7927" 5234.27
WESTWATER 37°31'58.5013" 109°31 '25.7357" 5468.32
@ estimated dry area
TW4-42 temporary perched monitoring well
¢ 5528 installed April, 2019 showing
elevation in feet amsl
MW-38 perched monitoring well
"9-5462 installed February, 2018 showing
elevation in feet amsl
TW4-40 temporary perched monitoring well
-+,5527 installed February, 2018 showing
elevation in feet amsl
M:';5
503 perched monitoring well showing
elevation in feet amsl
TW4-12 . . 0 5571 temporary perched momtonng well
showing elevation in feet amsl
TWN-7 d . . . <>5567 temporary perche nitrate momtonng
well showing elevation in feet amsl
PIEZ-1 perched piezometer showing
-1 5589 elevation in feet amsl
RUIN SPRING o 5380 seep or spring showing
elevation in feet amsl
NOTES: MW-4, MW-26, TW4-1, TW4-2, TW4-4, TW4-11, TW4-19, TW4-20, TW4-21, TW4-37, TW4-39, TW4-40 and TW4-41 are chloroform pumping wells;
TW4-2.2, TW4-24, TW4-25 and TWN-2 are nitrate pumpin.9. wells; TW4-11 water level is below the base of the Burro Canyon Formation
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM, INC.
KRIGED 3rd QUARTER, 2019 WATER LEVELS
{DR PIEZOMETERS NOT INCLUDED)
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE REFERENCE
H:/718000/nov19/WL/Uwl0919nodr.srf
FIGURE
C-1
@
TW4-42
¢5528
MW-38
-<?-5462
estimated dry area
temporary perched monitoring well
installed April, 2019 showing
elevation in feet amsl
perched monitoring well
installed February, 2018 showing
elevation in feet amsl
TW-440 temporary perched monitoring well
-+-5527 installed February, 2018 showing
elevation in feet amsl
M:55
503 perched monitoring well showing
elevation in feet amsl
TW4-12 0 5571 temporary perched monitoring well
showing elevation in feet amsl
TWN-7 t h d ·1 . . .A.5567 emporary perc e m rate monitoring
V well showing elevation in feet amsl
PIEZ-1 perched piezometer showing
g 5589 elevation in feet amsl
RUIN SPRING & 5380 seep or spring showing
elevation in feet amsl
NOTES: MW-4, MW-26, TW4-1 , TW4-2, lW4-4, TW4-11, TW4-19, TW4-20, lW4-21, TW4-37, TW4-39, TW4-40 and TW4-41 are chloroform pumping wells;
TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25 and lWN-2 are nitrate p_umpin!I_ wells; lW4-11 water level is below the base of the Burro Canyon Formation
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
KRIGED 3rd QUARTER, 2019 WATER LEVELS
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE REfERENCE
H:/718000/nov19/WUUwl0919dr.srf
FIGURE
C-2
TabD
Analytical Laboratory Data
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Project: Annual Seeps and Springs 2019
Lab Sample ID: 1903737-001
Client Sample ID: Westwater Seep
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES Collection Date: 3/27/2019 930h
Received Date: 3/29/2019 1000h
Analytical Results DISSOLVED METALS
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
3440 South 700 West Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qua)
;;alt Lake City, UT 84119 Arsenic mg/L 4/5/2019 I 023h 4/8/2019 1225h £200.8 0.00500 < 0.00500
Beryllium mg/L 4/5/2019 I 023h 4/9/2019 1737h £200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Cadmium mg/L 4/5/2019 1023h 4/8/2019 1225h £200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Calcium mg/L 4/5/2019 1023h 4/10/2019 1316h £200.7 10.0 185 Phone:[phone]
Chromium mg/L 4/5/2019 1023h 4/8/2019 1225h £200.8 0.0250 < 0.0250
Toll Free: [phone] Cobalt mg/L 4/5/2019 1023h 4/8/2019 1225h £200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Fax: (80 I) 263-8687 Copper mg/L 4/5/2019 I 023h 4/8/2019 1225h £200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
!-mail: [e-mail] Iron mg/L 4/5/2019 1023h 4/10/2019 1523h £200.8 0.100 1.20
Lead mg/L 4/5/2019 I 023h 4/9/2019 1737h £200.8 0.00100 < 0.00100
web: www.awal-labs.com Magnesium mg/L 4/5/2019 1023h 4/10/2019 1316h £200.7 10.0 43.7
Manganese mg/L 4/5/2019 1023h 4/8/2019 1225h £200.8 0.0100 0.528 B
Mercury mg/L 4/4/2019 1830h 4/10/2019 830h £245.1 0.000500 < 0.000500
Kyle F. Gross Molybdenum mg/L 4/5/2019 1023h 4/8/2019 1225h £200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Laboratory Director Nickel mg/L 4/5/2019 I 023h 4/9/2019 1728h £200.8 0.0200 < 0.0200
Potassium mg/L 4/5/2019 1023h 4/10/2019 1329h £200.7 1.00 3.99
Jose Rocha Selenium mg/L 4/5/2019 1023h 4/8/2019 1225h £200.8 0.00500 < 0.00500
QA Officer Silver mg/L 4/5/2019 I 023h 4/9/2019 1728h £200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Sodium mg/L 4/5/2019 I 023h 4/10/2019 1316h £200.7 10.0 152
Thallium mg/L 4/5/2019 1023h 4/9/2019 1737h £200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Tin mg/L 4/5/2019 I 023h 4/8/2019 1225h £200.8 0.100 < 0.100
Uranium mg/L 4/5/2019 1023h 4/9/2019 1741h £200.8 0.000300 0.00492
Vanadium mg/L 4/5/2019 1023h 4/10/2019 1329h £200.7 0.0150 < 0.0150
Zinc mg/L 4/5/2019 1023h 4/9/2019 1728h £200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100 t
f -Analyte(s) were observed above the reporting limit in the filter blank. The filter blank was acceptable, as any associated samples do not
have results above the reporting limit/PQL.
2 -Analyte concentration is too high for accurate matrix spike recovery and/or RPD.
B -The filter blank was acceptable, as the method blank result is less than 10% of the lowest reported sample concentration.
Report Date: 4/11/2019 Page 5 of26
All analyses applicable lo lhe CWA. SOWA. and RCRA are performed m accordance to NELAC protocols Per1inent sampling information is located on the au:,ched COC Confidenlial Business Information: This repon is pro\'ided for the exclusi\ e use of the
~ddressee Pri, ile~>es o~ sub~seq~nt ~,~e of the ~:u:i1e of this .co1~pany or .in~ 1~mbe1 of its stafC, or reproduc1io~ ~f 1h1s repo~ in ~on~u:clion,. \\ith lhe u~~ertisement p~omolio.n 01 sale of ?1!~ ~rodL~cl or p,.ocess, ~r in ~onn~~ion \\ !•h lh~ r~-publication of 1his report
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Project: Annual Seeps and Springs 20 I 9
Lab Sample ID: 1903737-001
American West Client Sample ID: Westwater Seep
ANALYTICAL LABORATOR IES Collection Date: 3/27/2019 930h
Received Date: 3/29/2019 1000h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
3440 South 700 West Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
,alt Lake City, UT 84 I I 9 Ammonia (as N) mg/L 4/9/201 9 1235h 4/9/2019 1649h E350.I 0.0500 < 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mg/L 4/2/2019 749h SM2320B 1.00 450
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 4/2/2019 749h SM2320B 1.00 < 1.00
Phone: (80 I) 263-8686 Chloride mg/L 4/10/2019 2248h E300.0 5.00 41.6
Toll Free: [phone] Fluoride mg/L 4/11/2019 227h E300.0 0.100 0.505
Fax: [phone] Ion Balance % 4/10/2019 1356h Cale. -100 0.902
~-mail: [e-mail] Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L 3/29/2019 1326h E353.2 0.100 < 0.100
Sulfate mg/L 4/10/2019 2248h E300.0 37.5 436
web: www.awal-labs.com Total Anions, Measured meq/L 4/10/2019 1356h Cale. 19.3
Total Cations, meq/L 4/10/2019 1356h Cale. 19.6
Measured
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 3/29/2019 1145h SM2540C 20.0 1,110 Kyle F. Gross Total Dissolved Solids 4/10/2019 1356h Cale. 0.981
Laboratory Director Ratio,
Measured/Calculated
Jose Rocha Total Dissolved Solids, mg/L 4/10/2019 1356h Cale. 1,130
Calculated
QA Officer
Report Date: 4/11/2019 Page 6 of 26
All anal~ses applic.1ble to the CWA. SOWA. and RCRA we perfom1ed in accordance to NE LAC prolocols Pertinen1 sampling informa1ion is localed on tJ,e al1ached COC Confidential Business Information: This repor1 is provided for the e.~clusi\ e use or1he
~ddressee. P1i \ ile~es o.f su~seq~1enl ~~e of lhe ~'.'1;1e or this .crn~pan~ or rm.\ t~mbe1 of its slnff, or reproducl1~ ~f this repo~ in ~on~ection~ \\ith the a~, er1isemenl. P~?molio.n or sale of ::U!~ ~· od~cl or p1:ocess, ~r in ~onn~c~irn, \\!lh th~ r~·publicotion of this report
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
3440 South 700 West
;alt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: (80 I) 263-8686
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
!-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Annual Seeps and Springs 2019
1903737-00lA
Client Sample ID: Westwater Seep
Collection Date: 3/27/2019 930h
Received Date: 3/29/2019 1000h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 3/29/2019 1207h
Units: µg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Dilution Factor:
Contact: Tanner Holliday
Test Code: 8260-W-DENlOO
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
Method: SW8260C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
78-93-3 20.0 <20.0
67-64-1 20.0 <20.0
71-43-2 1.00 < 1.00
56-23-5 1.00 < 1.00
67-66-3 1.00 < 1.00
74-87-3 1.00 < 1.00
75-09-2 1.00 < 1.00
91-20-3 1.00 < 1.00
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
108-88-3 1.00 < 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00 < 1.00
Surrogate Units: µg/L CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 17060-07-0 47.8 50.00 95.5 72-151
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 460-00-4 51.3 50.00 103 80-152
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1868-53-7 50.6 50.00 IOI 72-135
Surr: Toluene-d8 2037-26-5 50.8 50.00 102 80-124
Report Date: 4/1 1/2019 Page 7 of 26
All anal~ ses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA me perfom1ed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinenl sampling information is located on the aliached COC Confidenlial Business. lnfonmuion: This repon is pro, ided for lhe exclusi\ e use oCthe
~ddressee Pri, ile~es o! su~se<f~tenl !'~e of the ~~1e of this .co1~pWl) or .Ul)' ·~~be1 of its slnff or reproducti~ ~f 1h1s repo~ in ~on~eclion_ \\ilh the a~, er1isement p~omotio.n or sale of?'!) ~1odl~CI OJ p,.ocess, ~r in ~onn~c!ion w!lh lh? r~-publication of this report
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: April 26, 2019
Company :
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Analytical forAnnual Seeps and Spring 2019 -------
Parameter
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Westwater Seep
475027001
Ground Water
27-MAR-19 09:30
Ol-APR-19
Client
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
lad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
3FPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
}ross Radium Alpha U 0.232 +/-0.270
The following Analytical Methods were perfonned:
MDC RL
0.982 1.00
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00106
DNMI001
Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCi/L JXC9 04/05/19 1228 1863376
----------------------\1 et hod DescriQ_ti_on _________ _ Analyst Comments
EPA 903.0
;urrogate/Tracer Recovery Test Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits ---------Result
3arium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received" 95 . l (25%-125%)
~otes:
:::ounting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (I-sigma).
;RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Column headers are defined as follows:
DF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Project: Seeps and Springs 2019
Lab Sample ID: 1906343-002
Client Sample ID: Ruin Spring
Collection Date: 6/11/2019 850h
Received Date: 6/13/2019 1054h
Analytical Results DISSOLVED METALS
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
3440 South 700 West Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
;alt Lake City, UT 84119 Arsenic mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/201 9 1351h E200.8 0.00500 < 0.00500
Be1yllium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 153511 E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Cadmium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1351h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Calcium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/28/201 9 1518h E200.7 10.0 165 Phone: (80 I) 263-8686 Chromium mg/L 6/14/201 9 1410h 6/17/2019 1351h E200.8 0.0250 < 0.0250
Toll Free: [phone] Cobalt mg/L 6/14/2019 141011 6/17/2019 1351h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Fax: (80 l) 263-8687 Copper mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/201 9 1351h E200.8 0.0100 <0.0100
!-mail: [e-mail] Iron mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1535h E200.8 0.0300 < 0.0300
Lead mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1535h E200.8 0.00100 < 0.00100
web: www.awal-labs.com Magnesium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/28/2019 1518h E200.7 10.0 45.6
Manganese mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1351h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Mercury mg/L 6/21/2019 1450h 6/24/2019 752h E245.J 0.000500 < 0.000500
Kyle F. Gross Molybdenum mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1351h E200.8 0.0100 0.0202
LaboratOJ)' Director Nickel mg/L 6/14/2019 141 Oh 6/17/2019 1351h E200.8 0.0200 < 0.0200
Potassium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/28/2019 1705h E200.7 1.00 3.31
Jose Rocha Selenium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1351h E200.8 0.00500 0.0108
QA Officer Silver mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1351h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Sodium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/28/2019 1518h E200.7 10.0 128
Thallium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1535h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Tin mg/L 6/14/2019 14 lOh 6/17/2019 1351h E200.8 0.100 < 0.100
Uranium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1550h E200.8 0.000300 0.00902
Vanadium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/28/2019 1705h E200.7 0.0150 < 0.0150
Zinc mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1930h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Report Date: 7/5/2019 Page 7 of35
All anal~ses applicnl>le 10 the CWA. SOWA. and RCRA rue perfom1ed in accordance to NELAC p1otocols Pertinent sampling i11formalio11 is located on the attached COC C'onl'idenlial Business Information: This 1epor1 is pro, ided for1he e'-.clusi, e use of the
~ddressee Pri,·ile~es or suh~seq~ent ~1;e or lhe ~~e of lhis
0
coi~p1m~ or M) 1~mbe1 of its staff. or reµroductio~ ~'. this repo~ in ~011~ec1ion~ ,, ith the n~\'er1isement p~omo1io.n or sale of ?J!~ ~1 odl~CL or P•.ocess, ~r in :onn:,c~ion w!th th: r:-publication of 1his report
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Project: Seeps and Springs 2019
Lab Sample ID: I 906343-002
Client Sample ID: Ruin Spring
Collection Date: 6/11/2019 850h
Received Date: 6/13/2019 1054h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
3440 South 700 West Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qua)
,alt Lake City, UT 84119 Ammonia (as N) mg/L 6/23/2019 2000h 6/24/2019 l 127h E350.I 0.0500 < 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mg/L 6/1712019 739h SM2320B 1.00 202
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 6/17/2019 739h SM2320B 1.00 < 1.00
Phone: (80 I) 263-8686 Chloride mg/L 6/28/2019 043h E300.0 1.00 23.9
Toll Free: [phone] Fluoride mg/L 6/28/2019 256h E300.0 0.100 0.505
Fax: (80 I) 263-8687 Ion Balance % 6/28/2019 1847h Cale. -100 9.31
!-mail: [e-mail] Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L 611412019 1048h E353.2 0.100 1.56
Sulfate mg/L 6/27/2019 2139h E300.0 37.5 474
web: www.awal-labs.com Total Anions, Measured meq/L 6/28/2019 1847h Cale. 14.6
Total Cations, meq/L 612812019 1847h Cale. 17.6
Measured
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 6/1412019 I 100h SM2540C 20.0 900 Kyle F. Gross Total Dissolved Solids 6/28/2019 1847h Cale. 0.935
Laboratory Director Ratio,
Measured/Calculated
Jose Rocha Total Dissolved Solids, mg/L 612812019 I 847h Cale. 962
Calculated
QA Officer
Report Date: 7/5/2019 Page 11 of35
All anal) ses applicable to lhe CWA. SOW A. and RCRA are perfom1ed in accordance to NELAC prolocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the aUached COC Conftctenlinl Business Information: This report is pro,•ided for lhe exclusiYe use of lhe
~ddressee Pri, ile~es o.r su~seq~enl ~·~e of 1he ~?1:ne of this .co1~pan) or any 1~'!1be1 of its staff, or reproducli~ ~f this repo~ in ~on~teclion~ wilh the o~, ertisemenl. 11~omoli<>;t1 or sale (lf :11!~ ~rodl~cl or p,.ocess, ~r in ~m1~c~ion ''(th lh~ r~-publication of I his repor1
3440 South 700 West
~alt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: (80 I) 263-8686
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
!-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laborato1y Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Seeps and Springs 2019
Lab Sample ID: l 906343-002A
Client Sample ID: Ruin Spring
Collection Date: 6/11/2019 850h
Received Date: 6/13/2019 I 054h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 6/13/2019 1437h
Units: µg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorofonn
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Dilution Factor:
Contact: Tanner Holliday
Test Code: 8260-W-DENIOO
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
Method: SW8260C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
78-93-3 20.0 <20.0
67-64-1 20.0 <20.0
71-43-2 1.00 < 1.00
56-23-5 1.00 < 1.00
67-66-3 1.00 < l.00
74-87-3 1.00 < 1.00
75-09-2 1.00 < 1.00
91-20-3 1.00 < 1.00
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
I 08-88-3 1.00 < 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00 < 1.00
Surrogate Units: µg/L CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
Surr: l ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
17060-07-0
460-00-4
1868-53-7
2037-26-5
51.3
64.8
45.2
51.7
50.00 103 72-151
50.00 130 80-152
50.00 90.3 72-135
50.00 103 80-124
Report Date: 7/5/2019 Page 15 of35
All an.ti) ses applicable Lo lhe CWA. SOWA. and RCRA tue performed in accordance lo NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on tile attached COC C'onfidenLinl Business lnformnrion: This report is p1cn·tded for lhe exclusire use of the
~ddressee Pt i, ile~es o,r sub,..5eq~enl ~·~e or the ~?',lle of lhis .co1~pan~ or M) 1~7mbe1 or ils staff, or reproduclio~ ~f Lh1s repo~ in ~011~1eclion~ "ilh the a~, er1isemenl p~omolio.n or sale of ru!~ ~1odt~cl or P•.ocess, ~r in ~onn:_c~ion "~th 1h; r:-publica1io11 of this report
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: July 8, 2019
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: Analytical forSeeps and Springs 2019
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Ruin Spring
481772002
Ground Water
l l-JUN-19 08:50
13-JUN-l 9
Client
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty
lad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
}FPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
}ross Radium Alpha U -0.116 +/-0.106
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
MDC
0.642
RL
1.00
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00106
DNMI001
Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCi/L LXB3 06/28/19 1148 1888588
\.f~e~th~o~d _______ D_e_sc_r_.i _t_io_n _____________________ A~n~a~l st Co~m=m~e=nt~s __________ _
EPA 903.0
iurrogate/Tracer Recovery Test Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
3arium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received" 90.6 (25%-125%)
lfotes:
:ounting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (I-sigma).
iRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Column headers are defined as follows:
DF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Project: Seeps and Springs 2019
Lab Sample ID: 1906343-001
American West Client Sample ID: Entrance Seep
ANALYTICAL LABORATOR I ES Collection Date: 6/11/2019 815h
Received Date: 6/13/2019 1054h
Analytical Results DISSOLVED METALS
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
3440 South 700 West Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
,alt Lake City, UT 84119 Arsenic mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1342h E200.8 0.00500 0.00894
Beryllium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1448h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Cadmium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1342h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Calcium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/28/2019 1507h E200.7 10.0 155 Phone: [phone] Chromium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1342h E200.8 0.0250 < 0.0250
Toll Free: [phone] Cobalt mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1342h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Fax: (80 I) 263-8687 Copper mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1342h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
!-mail: [e-mail] Iron mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1448h E200.8 0.0300 0.453
Lead mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1448h E200.8 0.00100 < 0.00100
web: www.awal-labs.com Magnesium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/28/2019 1507h E200.7 10.0 48.0
Manganese mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/J 7/2019 1342h E200.8 0.0100 0.587
Mercury mg/L 6/21/2019 1450h 6/24/2019 758h E245.l 0.000500 < 0.000500
Kyle F. Gross Molybdenum mg/L 6/14/2019 14 JOh 6/17/2019 1342h E200.8 0.0100 0.01.43
Laboratory Director Nickel mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1342h E200.8 0.0200 < 0.0200
Potassium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/28/2019 1703h E200.7 1.00 4.66
Jose Rocha Selenium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1342h E200.8 0.00500 < 0.00500
QA Officer Silver mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1342h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Sodium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/28/2019 1507h E200.7 10.0 126
Thallium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1448h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Tin mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1342h E200.8 0.100 <0.100
Uranium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1547h E200.8 0.000300 0.0701
Vanadium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/28/2019 1703h E200.7 0.0150 < 0.0150
Zinc mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1927h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
2 -Analyte concentration is too high/or accurate matrix spike recovery and/or RPD.
Report Date: 7/5/2019 Page 6 of 35
All anal~ses applicable lo the CWA. SOWA. and RCRA are perfomled in accordance Lo NELAC protocols Pe11inent sampling information is located on lhe atlached COC Confidential Business Information: This report is pro, ided for lhe exclusiYe use of 1he
~ddressee Pri, ile~es o~ subpsec1~1ent ~,~e of the ~~1e of this .co1~pan~ or M) 1~mbe1 of its slaff, or reproduclio!~ ~f this repo~ in ~on~1ecli01~ \\ith 1he n~,enisemenL P~?moti~n 01 sale of?'!) ~1odL~CI or P•.ocess, ~1 in ~onn~c!ion '''!th lh~ r~·publication of this repcirl
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Project: Seeps and Springs 2019
Lab Sample ID: 1906343-00 I
American West Client Sample ID: Entrance Seep
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES Collection Date: 6/11/2019 815h
Received Date: 6/13/2019 1054h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
3440 South 700 West Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
,alt Lake City, UT 84 I 19 Ammonia (as N) mg/L 6/23/2019 2000h 6/24/2019 1120h E350.l 0.0500 0.168
Bicarbonate (as mg/L 6/17/2019 739h SM2320B 1.00 480
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 6/J 7/2019 739h SM2320B 1.00 < 1.00
Phone: [phone] Chloride mg/L 6/27/2019 2016h E300.0 1.00 104
Toll Free: [phone] Fluoride mg/L 6/28/2019 346h E300.0 0.100 0.912
fax: (80 I) 263-8687 Ion Balance % 6/28/2019 1847h Cale. -100 4.46
!-mail : [e-mail] Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L 6/J 4/2019 1110h E353.2 0.100 < 0.100
Sulfate mg/L 6/27/2019 2016h E300.0 7.50 160
web: www.awal-labs.com Total Anions, Measured meq/L 6/28/2019 1847h Cale. 15.9
Total Cations, meq/L 6/28/2019 1847h Cale. 17.4
Measured
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 6/14/2019 I JOOh SM2540C 20.0 892 @ Kyle F. Gross Total Dissolved Solids 6/28/2019 1847h Cale. 1.01
Laboratory Director Ratio,
Measured/Calculated
Jose Rocha Total Dissolved Solids, mg/L 6/28/2019 1847h Cale. 887
Calculated
QA Officer @ -High RPD due to suspected sample non-homogeneity or matrix interference.
1 -Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
Report Date: 7/5/2019 Page 10 of35
All anal~ ses applicnllle lo lhe CW A. SOWA and RCRA a1e perfomted in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling informal ion is located on Lhe attached COC Conlidentiol Business lnformalion: This repon is pro\'ided for the exclusi, e use of the
~cldressee Pri, ile~es or su~se<1~1en1 ~,~e or lhe ~~1e of this .co1~pan~ 01 an~ 1~~mber or its slaff, or re1>roducti~ ~r this repo~ in _con~eclion .. ,,i1h the a~, ertisement. P~?moti~n o, sale of?'!~ ~rod~cl or p~ocess, ~r in ~onn':~ion "!'h th~ r~-publication of this repor1
3440 South 700 West
,alt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: (80 I) 263-8686
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
!-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle f. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Seeps and Springs 2019
Lab Sample ID: l 906343-00 I A
Client Sample ID: Entrance Seep
Collection Date: 6/ 11/2019 815h
Received Date: 6/13/2019 1054h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 6/13/2019 1417h
Units: µg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Dilution Factor:
Contact: Tanner Holliday
Test Code: 8260-W-DENlOO
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
Method: SW8260C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
78-93-3 20.0 <20.0
67-64-1 20.0 <20.0
71-43-2 1.00 < 1.00
56-23-5 1.00 < 1.00
67-66-3 1.00 < 1.00
74-87-3 1.00 < 1.00
75-09-2 1.00 < 1.00
91-20-3 1.00 < 1.00
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
108-88-3 1.00 5.59
1330-20-7 1.00 < 1.00
Surrogate Units: µg/L CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
Surr: I ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
J 7060-07-0
460-00-4
1868-53-7
2037-26-5
56.3
53.1
51.1
50.6
50.00 113 72-151
50.00 106 80-152
50.00 102 72-135
50.00 101 80-124
Report Date: 7/5/2019 Page 14 of35
All annl~ses ap1>licable to the CWA. SOWA. and RCRA ,ue flerformed in accordance lo NELAC protocols Pertinenl srunpling information is located on the nUached COC Confidenlml Business Information: TI1is report is 1>ro, 1ded for the exclusi, e use of the
~ddressee Pri, ile~es o~ sub__seq~ent ~,~e or the ~~1e of I his .co11_1pnny or an~ ~mbet of ils sl:tIT. or reproduc1i~ ~f this repo~ in ~on~1eclion .. ,,ith the u~, ertisement. p~omoti~n 01 sale of?'!~ ~1odl~CI or p1.ocess. ~r in ~onn~~ion \\'!th lh~ r~-publicalion or this report
Company:
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Analytical forSeeps and Springs 2019 ----------Entrance Seep
481772001
Ground Water
11-JUN-19 08:15
13-JUN-19
Client
Project:
Client ID:
Report Date:
DNMI00106
DNMIOOl
July 8, 2019
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC RL Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
lad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
:iFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
}ross Radium Alpha 2.63 +/-0.455 0.947 1.00 pCi/L LXB3 06/28/19 1148 1888588
The following Analytical Methods were performed: -----------------\1 et hod Descri tion Anal st Comments
EPA 903.0
;urrogate/Tracer Recovery Test Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits ---------------------------~----'-----3 a r i um Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received" 89.9 (25%-125%)
'fotes:
=:ounting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (I-sigma).
;RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Column headers are defined as follows:
DF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Project: Seeps and Springs 2019
Lab Sample ID: l 906343-003
Client Sample ID: Cottonwood Spring
Collection Date: 6/11/2019 950h
Received Date: 6/13/2019 1054h
Analytical Results DISSOLVED METALS
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
3440 South 700 West Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
:;alt Lake City, UT 84119 Arsenic mg/L 6/14/2019 141 Oh 6/17/2019 1401h E200.8 0.00500 < 0.00500
Beryllium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1454h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Cadmium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1401h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Calcium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/28/2019 1527h E200.7 10.0 122 Phone: (80 I) 263 -8686
Chromium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1401h E200.8 0.0250 < 0.0250
Toll Free: [phone] Cobalt mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1401h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Fax: [phone] Copper mg/L 6/14/2019 141 Oh 6/17/2019 1401h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
~-mail: [e-mail] Iron mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1454h E200.8 0.0300 < 0.0300
Lead mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1454h E200.8 0.00100 < 0.00100
web: www.awal-labs.com Magnesium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/28/2019 1527h E200.7 10.0 35.3
Manganese mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6117/2019 1401h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Mercury mg/L 6/21/2019 1450h 6/24/2019 800h E245.l 0.000500 < 0.000500
Kyle F. Gross Molybdenum mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1401h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Laboratory Director Nickel mg/L 6/14/2019 14 IOh 6/17/2019 1401h E200.8 0.0200 < 0.0200
Potassium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/28/2019 1712h E200.7 1.00 6.78
Jose Rocha Selenium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1401h E200.8 0.00500 < 0.00500
QA Officer Silver mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1401h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Sodium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/28/2019 1527h E200.7 10.0 268
Thallium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1454h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Tin mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1401h E200.8 0.100 < 0.100
Uranium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1553h E200.8 0.000300 0.0101
Vanadium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/28/2019 1712h E200.7 0.0150 < 0.0150
Zinc mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1939h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Report Date: 7/5/2019 Page 8 of35
All Mal~ses applicable lo the CWA, SOWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC prolocols Pe11inent sampling information is located on 1he allached COC Conlidenlial Business lnfounalion: This report is provided for theexdusi,e use of the
~ddressee Pri, ile~es o~su~seq~enl ~J~e or the ~~1e of this .co1~pa11:,. or .in) ~mbet ofils sc:iff, or reproductio~ ~f this repo~ in .con~1eclion~ \\ilh the n~,erlisement. p~omoli~n or sale of~!~ ~todL~cl or p1.ocess, ~r in ~nm;c!ion "'.th 1h~ r~-publication of this repor1
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Project: Seeps and Springs 2019
Lab Sample ID: 1906343-003
American West Client Sample ID: Cottonwood Spring
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES Collection Date: 6/11/2019 950h
Received Date: 6/13/2019 1054h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
3440 South 700 West Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
falt Lake City, UT 84119 Ammonia (as N) mg/L 6/23/2019 2000h 6/24/2019 1128h E350.l 0.0500 < 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mg/L 6/17/2019 739h SM23208 1.00 286
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 6/17/2019 739h SM23208 1.00 < 1.00
Phone: (80 I) 263 -8686 Chloride mg/L 6/27/2019 2156h E300.0 5.00 138
Toll Free: [phone] Fluoride mg/L 6/28/2019 403h E300.0 0.100 0.249
Fax: (80 I) 263-8687 Ion Balance % 6/28/2019 1847h Cale. -100 6.19
~-mail: [e-mail] Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L 6/14/2019 llllh E353.2 0.100 < 0.100
Sulfate mg/L 6/27/2019 2156h E300.0 37.5 423
web: www.awal-labs.com Total Anions, Measured meq/L 6/28/2019 1847h Cale. 18.4
Total Cations, meq/L 6/28/2019 1847h Cale. 20.9
Measured
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 6/14/2019 1100h SM2540C 20.0 1,010 Kyle F. Gross Total Dissolved Solids 6/28/2019 1847h Cale. 0.868
Laboratory Director Ratio,
Measured/Calculated
Jose Rocha Total Dissolved Solids, mg/L 6/28/2019 1847h Cale. 1,170
Calculated
QA Officer
Report Date: 7/5/2019 Page 12 of35
All analyses a1>plicable lo lhe CW A. SDWA. and RCRA are perfom1ed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnalion is locnted on the attached COC C'onlidentiol Business Information: This 1epor1 is plO\ ided for lhe exclusi, e use of the
~ddressee Pri, ile~es of su~seq~1enl ~~e ol"the ~~1e of this .con:1pnn~ or an~ ~mbe1 of its stMT. or reproductio~ ~f this repo~ in ~01~1eclion~ \\ith then~, ertisemen1 p~omolio.n 01 sale of :11!~ ~1odl~CI or p1.ocess, ~r in ~nn~c!ion w!lh 1h~ r~-publication of this 1eporl
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
3440 South 700 West
;alt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: (80 I) 263-8686
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: (80 I) 263-8687
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Seeps and Springs 2019
Lab Sample ID: l 906343-003A
Client Sample ID: Cottonwood Spring
Collection Date: 6/11/2019 950h
Received Date: 6/13/2019 1054h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 6/13/2019 1457h
Units: µg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Dilution Factor:
Contact: Tanner Holliday
Test Code: 8260-W-DENIOO
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
Method: SW8260C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
78-93-3 20.0 <20.0
67-64-1 20.0 <20.0
71-43-2 1.00 < 1.00
56-23-5 1.00 < 1.00
67-66-3 1.00 < 1.00
74-87-3 1.00 < 1.00
75-09-2 1.00 < 1.00
91-20-3 1.00 < 1.00
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
108-88-3 1.00 < 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00 < 1.00
Surrogate Units: µg/L CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
Surr: l ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
17060-07-0
460-00-4
1868-53-7
2037-26-5
51.2
54.5
45.5
50.6
50.00 102 72-151
50.00 109 80-152
50.00 91.0 72-135
50.00 101 80-124
Report Date: 7/5/2019 Page 16 of35
All analyses applicable Lo lhe CWA. SOWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is localed on Lhe allached COC ConfidenLiul Business Information: This report is prm ided for lhe exclusi, e use or the
~ddressee. P1i, ile~es o.r sub...5eq~ent ~·~e of Lhe ~~1e of [his .co11:1pan~ or an~ 1~mbe1 of its slaff. or reproduclio~ ~f Lhis repo1; in .con?ection~ ,,ith then~, ertisement. P~?moli~n 01 sale of~!) rrod~cl or p1.ocess, ~r in ~onn1;_c~Lon '''!th lh~ r~-publicalion of Lhis report
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: Analytical forSeeps and Springs 2019 ------------Client Sample ID: Cottonwood Spring
Sample ID: 481772003
Matrix: Ground Water
Collect Date: l l-JUN-19 09:50
Receive Date: 13-JUN-19
Collector: Client
Project:
Client ID:
Report Date:
DNMI00106
DNMI001
July 8, 2019
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC RL Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method ----------------~--------------lad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
}FPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
}ross Radium Alpha U 0.393 +/-0.257 0.833 1.00 pCi/L LXB3 06/28/19 1149 1888588
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
\1ethod Description Analyst Comments
EPA 903.0
;urrogate/Tracer Recovery Test Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits ---------------3arium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received" 76. 6 (25%-125%)
llotes:
:::ounting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (I-sigma).
;RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Column headers are defined as follows:
OF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Project: Seeps and Springs 2019
Lab Sample ID: 1906343-004
Client Sample ID: Back Spring
Collection Date: 6/11/2019 850h
Received Date: 6/13/2019 1054h
Analytical Results DISSOLVED METALS
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
3440 South 700 West Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
;alt Lake City, UT 84119 Arsenic mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1404h E200.8 0.00500 < 0.00500
Beryllium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1508h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Cadmium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1404h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Calcium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/28/2019 1529h E200.7 10.0 157 Phone: (80 I) 263-8686 Chromium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1404h E200.8 0.0250 < 0.0250
Toll Free: [phone] Cobalt mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1404h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Fax: [phone] Copper mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1404h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
~-mail: [e-mail] Iron mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1508h E200.8 0.0300 < 0.0300
Lead mg/L 6/14/2019 141 Oh 6/17/2019 1508h E200.8 0.00100 < 0.00100
web: www.awal-labs.com Magnesium mg/L 6/14/2019 14 !Oh 6/28/2019 1529h E200.7 10.0 35.7
Manganese mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1404h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Mercury mg/L 6/21/2019 1450h 6/24/2019 802h E245.l 0.000500 < 0.000500
Kyle F. Gross Molybdenum mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1404h E200.8 0.0100 0.0187
Laboratory Director Nickel mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1404h E200.8 0.0200 < 0.0200
Potassium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/28/2019 1715h E200.7 1.00 3.30
Jose Rocha Selenium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1404h E200.8 0.00500 0.00961
QA Officer Silver mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1404h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Sodium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/28/2019 1529h E200.7 10.0 119
Thallium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1508h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Tin mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1404h E200.8 0.100 < 0.100
Uranium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1557h E200.8 0.000300 0.00901
Vanadium mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/28/2019 1715h E200.7 0.0150 < 0.0150
Zinc mg/L 6/14/2019 1410h 6/17/2019 1943h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Report Date: 7/5/2019 Page 9 of35
All anal~ses applicable Lo lhe CWA. SOWA. and RCRA are performed m accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the allached COC Confidential Business Information: TI1is report is prm ided for the exclusi, e use of lhe
~ddressee Pri\ ile~es o.r sub}eq~enl ~~e of the ~~1e of lhis .co1~pan~ or an~ 1~mbe1 of its slaff, or reproductio~ ~f I his repm; in .con~tection~ \\ilh the a~, ertisement p~omotio.n OI saJe of ?1!). rrodL!CL or p~ocess. ~r in :onm~c~ion \\ !lh lh~ rr::-publication or this repor1
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Project: Seeps and Springs 2019
Lab Sample ID: 1906343-004
Client Sample ID: Back Spring
Collection Date: 6/11/2019 850h
Received Date: 6/13/2019 1054h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
3440 South 700 West Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
~alt Lake City, UT 84119 Ammonia (as N) mg/L 6/23/2019 2000h 6/24/2019 1129h E350.J 0.0500 < 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mg/L 6/17/2019 739h SM2320B 1.00 202
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 6/17/2019 739h SM2320B 1.00 < 1.00
Phone:[phone] Chloride mg/L 6/28/2019 100h E300.0 1.00 23.7
Toll Free: [phone] Fluoride mg/L 6/28/2019 420h E300.0 0.100 0.460
Fax: (80 I) 263-8687 Ion Balance % 6/28/2019 1847h Cale. -100 6.06
~-mail: [e-mail] Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L 6/14/2019 1051h E353.2 0.100 1.65
Sulfate mg/L 6/27/2019 2213h E300.0 37.5 455
web: www.awal-labs.com Total Anions, Measured meq/L 6/28/2019 1847h Cale. 14.2
Total Cations, meq/L 6/28/2019 1847h Cale. 16.1
Measured
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 6/14/2019 1100h SM2540C 20.0 816 Kyle F. Gross Total Dissolved Solids 6/28/2019 1847h Cale. 0.889
Laboratory Director Ratio,
Measured/Calculated
Jose Rocha Total Dissolved Solids, mg/L 6/28/2019 1847h Cale. 918
Calculated
QA Officer
Report Date: 7/5/2019 Page 13 of35
All anal~ses applicable to lhe (WA. SDWA. and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC p1olocols Pertinenl sampliny informulion is located on lhe aU.iched COC C'onfidentinl Business lnformulion: This repor1 is provided for the exclusi\e use of lhe
~ddressee P1i, ile~es of su~seq~1enl ~'!e of the ~:11;1e of this .con_,p•m~ or rtn} r~mbe1 or its slnff. or reproduclio~ ~r this repo~ in ~on~t~lion .. \\ith lhe ll~\ ertisement P~?motio.n or sale of ~lY ~tOdl~CI or p1
0
ocess, ?r in ;0nm;.c~ion ,\ }th 1h~ r~·publicotion of this 1eport
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Seeps and Springs 2019
l 906343-004A
American West Client Sample ID:
ANALvT1cAL LAeoRAToR1Es Collection Date:
Back Spring
6/11/2019 850h
3440 South 700 West
~alt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: (80 I) 263-8686
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax:[phone]
~-mail : [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Received Date: 6/13/2019 1054h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 6/13/2019 1517h
Units: µg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate Units: µg/L
Surr: l,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-dB
Dilution Factor:
CAS
17060-07-0
460-00-4
1868-53-7
2037-26-5
Contact: Tanner Holliday
Test Code: 8260-W-DENlOO
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
Method: SW8260C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
78-93-3 20.0 <20.0
67-64-1 20.0 <20.0
71-43-2 1.00 < 1.00
56-23-5 1.00 < 1.00
67-66-3 1.00 < 1.00
74-87-3 1.00 < 1.00
75-09-2 1.00 < 1.00
91-20-3 1.00 < 1.00
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
108-88-3 1.00 < 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00 < 1.00
Result Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
51.4 50.00 103 72-151
55.2 50.00 110 80-152
45.6 50.00 91.3 72-135
51.5 50.00 103 80-124
Report Date: 7/5/2019 Page 17 of35
All anal~ ses a1>i,licrible 10 lhe CWA. SOWA~ and RCRA me perlom1ed in accordRnce to NELAC prolocols Pertmenl sampling information is located on Ll1e auached COC Conl'identinl Business Information: This re1>0r1 is provided for the e.xcluSi\e use or the
~ddressee Pri, i le~es o: sub .. seq~ent ~~e of lhe ~~e of lhis .co':1prm~ or nny 1~mbe1 of its slafT. or reproduclio~ ~f this repo~ in .con~lec11on .. " ilh lhe n~, ertisement p~omotio.n or sale or~!~ ~rod~cl or p1.ocess, ~1 in ~nn:_c!ion w~th th; r:-publicotion of this 1eporl
Company:
Address:
Contact:
Project:
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Analytical forSeeps and Springs 2019
Report Date: July 8, 2019
----------------------Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Back Spring
481772004
Ground Water
1 l-JUN-19 08:50
13-JUN-19
Client
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00106
DNMI001
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC RL Units PF DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method "--------------lad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
}FPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
}ross Radium Alpha U 0.201 +/-0.158 0.545 1.00 pCi/L LXB3 07/02/19 0613 1888588
The following Analytical Methods were perfonned:
\1ethod Description Analyst Comments
EPA 903.0
;urrogate/Tracer Recovery Test Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
3arium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received" 91.3 (25%-125%)
lfotes:
:ounting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (I-sigma).
;RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Column headers are defined as follows:
DF: Dilution Factor
DL: Detection Limit
MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity
MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration
Le/LC: Critical Level
PF: Prep Factor
RL: Reporting Limit
SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Annual Seeps and Springs 2019
1903737-002A
Client Sample ID: Trip Blank
ANALYTICAL LAB0RAT0R1Es Collection Date: 3/27/2019 930h
3440 South 700 West
;alt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: (80 I) 263-8687
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Received Date: 3/29/2019 1000h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 3/29/2019 1227h
Units: µg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Dilution Factor:
Contact: Tanner Holliday
Test Code: 8260-W-DENIOO
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
Method: SW8260C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
78-93-3 20.0 <20.0
67-64-1 20.0 <20.0
71-43-2 1.00 < 1.00
56-23-5 1.00 < 1.00
67-66-3 1.00 < 1.00
74-87-3 1.00 < 1.00
75-09-2 1.00 < 1.00
91-20-3 1.00 < 1.00
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
108-88-3 1.00 < 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00 < 1.00
Surrogate Units: µg/L CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Surr: l,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromotluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromotluoromethane
Surr: Toluenc-d8
17060-07-0
460-00-4
1868-53-7
2037-26-5
48.5
52.2
50.5
51.2
50.00 97.0 72-151
50.00 104 80-152
50.00 IOI 72-135
50.00 102 80-124
Report Date: 4/11/2019 Page 8 of26
All anal~ses applicnble to the CWA. SOWA. and RCRA me perfom,ed in accordance to NELAC prolocols, Pe1tinenl sampling i1,ronnDlion is locr1ted on lhe altached COC. Confidential Business Jnfonnation: This repor1 is pro, ided for the exclush e use oflhe
~ddressee P1i\ ile~es o.f sub .. sec,~enl ~1~e or lhe ~~e or this
0
co1~po.n~ or M) 1~mbe1 or its slaff, or reproducti~ ~f this repo~ in .con~1ec11on~ ,\11h the <I~\ er1isement. p~omo1i~ or sale of~!~ ~rodllCl or p~ocess, ?r in ~nn~c~ion \\ !'h lh~ r~-publica1ion of this repor1
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Seeps and Springs 2019
1906343-005A
American West Client Sample ID: Trip Blank
ANALYTICAL LAeoRAToA1es Collection Date: 6/11/2019 815h
3440 South 700 West
,alt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: (801 ) 263-8686
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: (80 I) 263-8687
!-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Received Date: 6/13/2019
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 6/13/2019 1357h
Units: µg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate Units: µg/L
Surr: l ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
1054h
Dilution Factor:
CAS
17060-07-0
460-00-4
1868-53-7
2037-26-5
Contact: Tanner Holliday
Test Code: 8260-W-DENIOO
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
Method: SW8260C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
78-93-3 20.0 <20.0
67-64-1 20.0 <20.0
71-43-2 1.00 < 1.00
56-23-5 1.00 < 1.00
67-66-3 1.00 < 1.00
74-87-3 1.00 < 1.00
75-09-2 1.00 < 1.00
91-20-3 1.00 < 1.00
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
108-88-3 1.00 < 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00 < 1.00
Result Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
50.9 50.00 102 72-151
53.9 50.00 108 80-152
45.4 50.00 90.9 72-135
50.2 50.00 100 80-124
Report Date: 7/5/2019 Page 18 of35
All annl~ ses applicnble to lhe C'WA. SOWA_ Md RCRA are perfom,ed in accordance 10 NELAC protocols. Peninent sampling infonnation is Jocnted on tJ1e altached COC Coniiden1inl Business Information: This report is provided for 1he exclusi\e use of the
~ddressee Pri, ile~es o: sub .. seq~enl ~·~e or Lhe ~:'1.'1e of this .con,ipnn~ or M) 1~mbe1 of ils slalT. or reproductio1~ ~: lh1s repm; in .cot)?tction ... \\ilh the a~, er1iseme111 p~omoti~n ~r sale of~!~. ~rod~cl or P•.?cess, ~r in ~nn:_c~ion w!th th~ r1;-publicutio11 of this repor1
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
3440 South 700 West
;alt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: (80 I) 263-8686
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail : [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Tanner Holliday
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 South Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
TEL: [phone]
RE: Annual Seeps and Springs 2019
Dear Tanner Holliday: Lab Set ID: 1903737
American West Analytical Laboratories received sample(s) on 3/29/2019 for the analyses
presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AW AL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) in Utah and Texas; and is
state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, Wyoming, and Missouri.
All analyses were performed in accordance to the NELAP protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation scope documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
Thank You,
Approved by:
K I F Digitally signed y e . by Kyle F. Gross
Date:
Gross 2019.04.11
15:39:22 -06'00'
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 4/11/2019 Page I of26
All anal~ ses applicnble to lhe CWA. SOWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance lo NELAC protocols Per1inent sampling informolion is locnled on lhe allached COC Conridenliol Business lnformalion: This report is pro,ided for lhe exclusiH use oflhe
~ddressee Pri, ile~es of sub .. seq~1enl ~~e or lhe ~~i:: or this .co1~pan~ or an~ 1~:mbe1 of ils staff. or reproduclio~ ~~ this repo~ in
0
C011)1ection~ \\ilh the a~, e11isemenl. P~?motio.n or sale or :U!> ~rodi~t or p~ocess, ~r in ~nm~.c!ion w~lh th~ r~·publication or 1his report
3440 South 700 West
;alt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: (80 I) 263-8686
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
!-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Client:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Annual Seeps and Springs 2019
1903737
Date Received: 3/29/2019 1 OOOh
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected
1903737-00lA Westwater Seep 3/27/2019 930h
1903737-00IB Westwater Seep 3/27/2019 930h
1903737-00lB Westwater Seep 3/27/2019 930h
1903737-00lC Westwater Seep 3/27/2019 930h
1903737-00ID Westwater Seep 3/27/2019 930h
1903737-00ID Westwater Seep 3/27/2019 930h
1903737-00lE Westwater Seep 3/27/2019 930h
1903737-00IE Westwater Seep 3/27/2019 930h
1903737-00lE Westwater Seep 3/27/2019 930h
1903737-00 IE Westwater Seep 3/27/2019 930h
l 903737-002A Trip Blank 3/27/2019 930h
Contact: Tanner Holliday
Matrix Analysis
Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Aqueous Alkalinity/ Bicarbonate/
Carbonate, Low Level
Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Aqueous Mercury, Drinking Water
Dissolved
Aqueous ICPMS Metals, Dissolved
Aqueous ICP Metals, Dissolved
Aqueous Ion Balance
Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Report Date: 4/11/2019 Page 2 of 26
All anal~ ses applicnble lo lhe CWA. SOWA. and RCRA are perfom1ed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinenl sampling informalion is located 011 Lhe allached COC Confidential Business Jnformaliotr This repor1 is prO\'ided for lhe exclusirn use of 1he
~ddressee Pri, ile~es o~ su~seq~enl ~·~e of the ~~ne of lhis .co,~p:m~ or an~ 1~mber of its slafT. or reproduclior~ ~f I his repo~ in ~on~1ec1ion~ \\ith the a~, ertisemenl p~~moli<>;" or sale of :1'!~ ~roch~I or p~ocess, ~r in ~nn~c!ion "!'h lh~ r~-publication of lhis r~port
3440 South 700 West
;aft Lake City, UT 84 I 19
Phone:[phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: (80 I) 263-8687
~-mail : [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Inorganic Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Tanner Holliday
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
Annual Seeps and Springs 2019
1903737
3/29/2019
3/27/2019
Intact
See Chain of Custody
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation for the
samples were performed within the method holding times. The samples were properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPO, DUP:
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination, with the following
exceptions: Zinc and Manganese were observed above the reporting limit in the
filter blank MB-FIL TER-61769. The blank was acceptable, as any associated
samples do not have results above the reporting limits.
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike / Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, with the
following exceptions:
Sam le ID Anal e QC
1903737-00lE Sodium MSD
Duplicate (DUP): The parameters that required a duplicate analysis had RPDs
within the control limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 4/11/2019 Page 3 of 26
All annl~ses applicable lo the CWA SOWA. and RCRA are perfom1ed in accordance to NELAC prolocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the all:iched COC Confidential Business lnfornuilion: This repon is pro,·ided for 1he exclusi\e use ofthl"
~ddressee Pri, ile~es of sub .. seci~1ent ~;e or the ~:":'le of lhis .co,~puny or an~ t~mber of ils st:1ff. or reproduclio~ ~( this repo~ in ~on~1ec1ion ... with the a~, ertisemenL P~?mori~n or sale of?'!) ~rodL~cl or p~oces~, ~r in ~onn~c~ion \\ !th 1h~ r~-publication of this reporl
3440 South 700 West
~alt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: (80 I) 263-8686
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: (80 I) 263-8687
!-mail : [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Volatile Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Tanner Holliday
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
Method:
Analysis:
Annual Seeps and Springs 2019
1903737
3/29/2019
3/27/2019
Intact
See Chain of Custody
SW-846 8260C/5030C
Volatile Organic Compounds
General Set Comments: No target analytes were observed above reporting limits.
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: All samples were received in appropriate
containers and properly preserved. The analysis and preparation of all samples were
performed within the method holding times following the methods stated on the analytical
reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPO, and Surrogates:
Method Blanks (MBs): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCSs): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike / Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Surrogates: All surrogate recoveries were within established limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 4/11/2019 Page 4 of26
All an:il) ses applicable to the CW A4 SOW A. and RCRA are per(om1ed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinenl sampling information is located on the auached COC Confidential Business lnformalion: This report is pro\ ided for lhe exclusi\e use or lhe
~ddressee Pri, ile~es or su~seq~enl ~1;e or lhe ~~e of lhis .cm~pan~ or an) ~mber of ils starr. or reproducli~ ~f lhis repo~ in ~Ol~leclion~ \\ith lhe :)~vertisemenl. p~~moli°!1 or sale of ?'!Y ~rodL~CI or p~ocess, ~· in ~onn~c!ion \\'!th th~ r~-publication of lhis ,~port
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
LabSetlD: 1903737
Project: Annual Seeps and Springs 2019
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: LCS-61799 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.7-DIS Date Prepared: -
Calcium 11.0
Magnesium 11.2
Potassium I I.I
Sodium I I.I
Vanadium 0.218
Lab Sample ID: LCS-61800 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared:
Arsenic 0.198
Beryllium 0.198
Cadmium 0.192
Chromium 0.200
Cobalt 0.195
Copper 0.196
Iron 0.992
Lead 0.180
Manganese 0.200
Molybdenum 0.191
Selenium 0.197
Thallium 0.177
Tin 0.967
Uranium 0.196
Lab Sample ID: LCS-61800 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared:
Nickel 0.189
Silver 0.194
Zinc 0.961
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Units Method
04/10/20191314h
04/05/2019 I 023h
mg/L E200.7
mg/L E200 7
mg/L E200.7
mg/L E200.7
mg/L E200.7
04/08/2019 1221h
04/05/2019 1023h
mg/L E200.8
mg/L E200.8
mg/L E200.8
mg/L E200 8
mg/L E200 8
mg/L E200.8
mg/L E200 8
mg/L E200.8
mg/L E200,8
mg/L E200.8
mg/L E200.8
mg/L E200.8
mg/L E200,8
mg/L E200.8
04/09/2019 1725h
04/05/2019 1023h
mg/L E200.8
mg/L E200.8
mg/L E200,8
MDL
0.0937
0.0439
0.134
0.187
0.00138
0.000298
0.000198
0.0000858
0.00191
0.000300
0.00282
0.0496
0.000448
0.00108
0.000652
0.000574
0.000154
0.00116
0.000176
0.00148
0.000232
0.00418
Reporting
Limit
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.00500
0.00200
0.00200
0.000500
0.00200
0.00400
0.00200
0.100
0.00200
0.00200
0.00200
0.00200
0.00200
0.00400
0.00200
0.00200
0.00200
0.00600
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Amount
Spiked
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
0.2000
0.2000
0.2000
0.2000
0.2000
0.2000
0.2000
1.000
0.2000
0.2000
0.2000
0.2000
0.2000
1.000
0.2000
0.2000
0.2000
1.000
Tanner Holliday
ME
LCS
Spike Ref.
Amount
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
%REC
110
112
Ill
Ill
109
98.8
99.2
96.2
99.9
97.4
97.9
99.2
90.1
99.8
95.6
98.5
88.7
96.7
97.8
94.6
97.0
96.1
Limits
85 -115
85 -115
85 -115
85 -115
85 -115
85 -115
85 -115
85 -115
85 -115
85 -115
85 -115
85 -115
85 -l l 5
85 -115
85 -115
85 -115
85 -115
85 -115
85 • 115
85 • 115
85 • 115
85 • 115
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 4/11/2019 Page 9 of 26
analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infom,ation is located on the attached COC Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use of tl-
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee \\rill be granted only on contact. This
American West ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1903737
Project: Annual Seeps and Springs 2019
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: LCs-61789 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: HG-DW-DIS-245.1 Date Prepared:
Mercury 0.00361
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone]. Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awai-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked
04/10/2019 824h
04/04/2019 1830h
mg/L E245.I 0.0000396 0.0000900 0.003330 -
Tanner Holliday
ME
LCS
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
0 108 -
Limits
85 -115
----
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Report Date: 4/11/2019 Page 10 of26
analyses applicable to the CWA. SOWA, and RCRA are perfom,ed in accordance to NE LAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC Confidential Business Information· This report is provided for the exe-\usive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use of ti-
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose olher than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
ANALYT ICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
LabSetID: 1903737
Project: Annual Seeps and Springs 2019
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: MB-61799 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.7-DIS Date Prepared: ---
Calcium < 1.00
Magnesium < 1.00
Potassium < 1.00
Sodium < 1.00
Vanadium < 0.00500
Lab Sample ID: MB-61800 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared: -
Arsenic < 0.000200
Beryllium < 0.000200
Cadmium < 0.0000500
Chromium < 0.000200
Cobalt < 0.000400
Copper < 0.000200
Iron < 0.0100
Lead < 0.000200
Manganese < 0.000200
Molybdenum < 0.000200
Selenium < 0.000200
Thallium < 0.000200
Tin < 0.000400
Uranium < 0.000200
Lab Sample ID: MB-FILTER-61769 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared:
Arsenic < 0.00200
Cadmium < 0.000500
Chromium < 0.00200
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone]. Fax: (801 ) 263-8687
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
_QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked
04/10/2019 131 lh
04/05/2019 1023h -
mg/L E200 7 0.0937 1.00
mg/L E200.7 0.0439 1.00
mg/L E200 7 0.134 1.00
mg/L E200.7 0.187 1.00
mg/L E200.7 0.00138 0.00500
04/08/2019 1218h
04/05/2019 1023h
mg/L E200.8 0.0000298 0.000200
mg/L E200.8 0.0000198 0.000200
mg/L E200.8 0.00000858 0.0000500
mg/L E200 8 0.000191 0.000200
mg/L E200.8 0.0000300 0.000400
mg/L E200.8 0.000282 0.000200
mg/L E200.8 0.00496 0.0100
mg/L E200.8 0.0000448 0.000200
mg/L E200.8 0.000108 0.000200
mg/L E200.8 0.0000652 0.000200
mg/L E200.8 0.0000574 0.000200
mg/L E200.8 0.0000154 0.000200
mg/L E200.8 0.000116 0.000400
mg/L E200.8 0.0000176 0.000200
04/08/2019 124 7h
04/05/2019 I 023h
mg/L E200.8 0.000298 0.00200
mg/L E200.8 0.0000858 0.000500
mg/L E200 8 0.00191 0.00200
Tanner Holliday
ME
MBLK
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPO Ref. RPD
Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Report Date: 4/11/2019 Page 11 of 26
analyses applicable to the CWA. SOWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infom,ation is located on the attached COC Confidential Business lnfonnation: This report is provided for the e:'<clusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use of ti-
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be ,grnnted only on contact This
American West
AN,6.LYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
LabSetID: 1903737
Project: Annual Seeps and Springs 2019
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: MB-FIL TER-61769 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared:
Cobalt < 0.00400
Copper < 0.00200
Manganese 0.00538
Molybdenum < 0.00200
Selenium < 0.00200
Tin < 0.00400
Lab Sample ID: MB-61800 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared:
Nickel < 0.00200
Silver < 0.00200
Zinc < 0.00600
Lab Sample ID: MB-FILTER-61769 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared: -
Beryllium < 0.000200
Lead < 0.000200
Nickel < 0.000200
Silver < 0,000200
Thallium < 0.000200
Uranium < 0.000200
Zinc 0.000800
Lab Sample ID: MB-FILTER-61769 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared:
Iron < 0.100
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: ( 888) 263-8686, fax: ( 801) 263-8687
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
_QC SUMMARY. REPQRT
Units Method
04/08/2019 124 7h
04/05/2019 1023h
mg/L E200.8
mg/L E200.8
mg/L E200,8
mg/L E200.8
mg/L E200.8
mg/L E200.8
04/09/2019 1722h
04/05/2019 1023h
mg/L E200 8
mg/L E200.8
mg/L E200.8 -04/09/2019 1744h
04/05/2019 I 023h
mg/L E200.8
mg/L E200.8
mg/L E200.8
mg/L E200.8
mg/L E200.8
mg/L E200.8
mg/L E200.8
04/10/2019 1533h
04/05/2019 1023h
mg/L E200.8
MDL
0.000300
0.00282
0.00108
0.000652
0.000574
0.00116
0.00148
0.000232
0.00418
0.0000198
0.0000448
0.000148
0.0000232
0.0000154
0.0000176
0.000418
0.0496
Reporting
Limit
0.00400
0.00200
0.00200
0.00200
0.00200
0.00400
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Amount
Spiked
------
0.00200
0.00200
0.00600
0.000200
0.000200
0.000200
0.000200
0.000200
0.000200
0.000600
0.100
Tanner Holliday
ME
MBLK
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
8
Bt
Report Date: 4/11/2019 Page 12 of26
cmalyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infom1atio11 is located on the attached COC Confidential Business lnfom1ation: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of tr
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
ANALYTICAL
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1903737
Project: Annual Seeps and Springs 2019
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: MB-61789 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: HG-DW-DIS-245.1 ___ _ __ Date Prepared:
Mercury < 0.0000900
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
_QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked
04/10/2019 822h
04/04/2019 1830h --
mg/L E245.l 0.0000396 0.0000900
Tanner Holliday
ME
MBLK
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC Limits
t -Analyte(s) were observed above the reporting limit in the jilter blank. The filter blank was acceptable, as any associated samples do not have results above the reporting limit!PQL.
B -The filter blank was acceptable, as the method blank result is less than I 0% of the lowest reported sample concentration.
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD Ref. RPD
Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Report Date: 4/11/2019 Page 13 of26
analyses applicable to the CWA. SOWA, and RCRA are perfom1ed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infom1ation is located on the attached COC Confidential Business Information: This repon is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use oft~
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement_ promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone]. fax: [phone] Laboratory Director
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
American West QC SUMMARY REPORT ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
LabSetID: 1903737 Dept: ME
Project: Annual Seeps and Springs 2019 QC Type: MS
---
Reporting Amount Spike Ref. RPDRef. RPO
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC Limits Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Lab Sample ID: 1903737-00IEMS Date Analyzed: 04/10/2019 1318h
Test Code: 200.7-DIS Date Prepared: 04/05/2019 I 023h ---
Calcium 194 mg/L E200.7 0.937 10.0 10.00 185 85.4 70 -130
Magnesium 53.6 mg/L E200,7 0.439 10.0 10.00 43.7 99.7 70 -130
Sodium 162 mg/L E200,7 1.87 10.0 10.00 152 103 70 -130
Lab Sample ID: 1903737-00lEMS Date Analyzed: 04/10/2019 1336h
Test Code: 200.7-DIS Date Prepared: 04/05/2019 1023h ----
Potassium 15.5 mg/L E200.7 0.134 1.00 10.00 3.99 115 70 -130
Vanadium 0.213 mg/L E200.7 0.00138 0.00500 0.2000 0 107 70 -130
Lab Sample ID: 1903737-00lEMS Date Analyzed: 04/08/2019 1234h
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared: 04/05/2019 I 023h --
Arsenic 0.208 mg/L E200.8 0.000298 0.00200 0.2000 0.00262 103 75 -125
Cadmium 0.191 mg/L E200 8 0.0000858 0.000500 0.2000 0.0000868 95.5 75 -125
Chromium 0.196 mg/L E200 8 0.00191 0.00200 0.2000 0 97.8 75 -125
Cobalt 0.192 mg/L E200.8 0.000300 0.00400 0.2000 0.00128 95 .3 75 -125
Copper 0.192 mg/L E200.8 0.00282 0.00200 0.2000 0 95.8 75 -125
Manganese 0.711 mg/L E200.8 0.00108 0.00200 0.2000 0.528 91.6 75 -125
Molybdenum 0.201 mg/L E200.8 0.000652 0.00200 0.2000 0.003 98.9 75 -125
Selenium 0.200 mg/L E200.8 0.000574 0.00200 0.2000 0.000832 99.5 75 -125
Tin 0.986 mg/L E200,8 0.00116 0.00400 1.000 0 98.6 75 -125
Lab Sample ID: 1903737-00lEMS Date Analyzed: 04/09/2019173lh
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared: 04/05/2019 I 023h
Beryllium 0.200 mg/L E200.8 0.000198 0.00200 0.2000 0 100 75 -125
Lead 0.187 mg/L E200 8 0.000448 0.00200 0.2000 0 93 .5 75 -125
Nickel 0.190 mg/L E200 8 0.00148 0.00200 0.2000 0 95.0 75 -125
Silver 0.189 mg/L E200 8 0.000232 0.00200 0.2000 0.000388 94.2 75 -125
Thallium 0.183 mg/L E200 8 0.000154 0.00200 0.2000 0 91.4 75 -125
Report Date: 4/11/2019 Page 14 of26
analyses applicable to the CWA. SOWA, and RCRA are perfom1ed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infom1ation is located on the attached COC Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use of tt
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any pu1'pose other than for the addressee ,-vill be granted only on contact This
ANALYTICAL
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1903737
Project: Annual Seeps and Springs 2019
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: 1903737-00lEMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared:
Uranium 0.202
Zinc 0.977
Lab Sample ID: 1903737-00IEMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared:
Iron 2.25
Lab Sample ID: 1903737-00lEMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: HG-DW-DIS-245.1 Date Prepared:
Mercury 0.00364
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
_Q_C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
Tanner Holliday
ME
QC Type: MS
Reporting Amount Spike Ref.
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC
04/09/2019 1731h
04/05/2019 I 023h --
mg/L E200.8 0.000176 0.00200 0.2000 0.00491 98.5
mg/L E200.8 0.00418 0.00600 1.000 0 97.7
04/10/2019 1526h
04/05/2019 I 023h ------
mg/L E200.8 0.0992 0.200 1.000 1.2 105
04/10/2019 832h
04/04/2019 1830h --
mg/L E245.I 0.0000396 0.0000900 0.003330 0 109 --
Limits
75 -125
75 -125
75 -125
-
85 -115
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD Ref. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit
------
Qual
Report Date: 4/11/2019 Page 15 of26
analyses applicable to the CWA. SOWA, and RCRA are perfom1ed in accordance to NE LAC protocols Pertinent samphng infom1ation is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business lnfom,ation: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use of tr
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone]. Fax: [phone] Laboratory Director
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
American West QC SUMMARY REPORT ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Lab Set ID: 1903737 Dept: ME
Project: Annual Seeps and Springs 2019 QC Type: MSD
---
Reporting Amount Spike Ref. RPO Ref. RPO
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC Limits Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Lab Sample ID: 1903737-00IEMSD Date Analyzed: 04/10/2019 1320h
Test Code: 200.7-DIS Date Prepared: 04/05/2019 1023h --
Calcium 198 mg/L E200,7 0.937 10.0 10.00 185 123 70 -130 194 1.93 20
Magnesium 55.3 mg/L E200,7 0.439 10.0 10.00 43.7 116 70 -130 53.6 3.06 20
Sodium 165 mg/L E200,7 1.87 10.0 10.00 152 134 70 -130 162 1.91 20
Lab Sample ID: 1903737-00IEMSD Date Analyzed: 04/10/2019 1338h
Test Code: 200.7-DIS Date Prepared: 04/05/2019 1023h ---
Potassium 15.3 mg/L E200 7 0.134 1.00 10.00 3.99 113 70 -130 15.5 1.42 20
Vanadium 0.211 mg/L E200.7 0.00138 0.00500 0.2000 0 106 70 -130 0.213 1.06 20 -Lab Sample ID: 1903737-00IEMSD Date Analyzed: 04/08/2019 1237h
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared: 04/05/2019 1023h ----------
Arsenic 0.209 mg/L E200.8 0.000298 0.00200 0.2000 0.00262 103 75 -125 0.208 0.495 20
Cadmium 0.188 mg/L E200 8 0.0000858 0.000500 0.2000 0.0000868 94.2 75 -125 0.191 1.46 20
Chromium 0.192 mg/L E200.8 0.00191 0.00200 0.2000 0 96.0 75 -125 0.196 1.91 20
Cobalt 0.189 mg/L E200,8 0.000300 0.00400 0.2000 0.00128 93 .6 75 -125 0.192 1.77 20
Copper 0.190 mg/L E200.8 0.00282 0.00200 0.2000 0 94.8 75 -125 0.192 1.02 20
Manganese 0.702 mg/L E200.8 0.00108 0.00200 0.2000 0.528 87.l 75 -125 0.711 1.28 20
Molybdenum 0.200 mg/L E200.8 0.000652 0.00200 0.2000 0.003 98.3 75 -125 0.201 0.529 20
Selenium 0.199 mg/L E200.8 0.000574 0.00200 0.2000 0.000832 99.0 75 -125 0.2 0.451 20
Tin 0.988 mg/L E200.8 0.00116 0.00400 1.000 0 98.8 75 -125 0.986 0.166 20
Lab Sample ID: 1903737-00IEMSD Date Analyzed: 04/09/2019 1734h
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared: 04/05/20[9 1023h
Beryllium 0.199 mg/L E200.8 0.000198 0.00200 0.2000 0 99.4 75 -125 0.2 0.823 20
Lead 0.182 mg/L E200.8 0.000448 0.00200 0.2000 0 90.9 75 -125 0.187 2.81 20
Nickel 0.187 mg/L E200.8 0.00148 0.00200 0.2000 0 93.7 75 -125 0.19 1.31 20
Silver 0.189 mg/L E200 8 0.000232 0.00200 0.2000 0.000388 94.l 75 -125 0.189 0.0912 20
Thallium 0.177 mg/L E200 8 0.000154 0.00200 0.2000 0 88.6 75 -125 0.183 3.14 20
Report Date: 4/11/2019 Page 16 of26
analyses applicable to the CWA, SOWA, and RCRA are perfom1ed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use of tJ-
ne of this company or any member of its stafl: or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1903737
Project: Annual Seeps and Springs 2019
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: 1903737-00lEMSD Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared: -----
Uranium 0.196
Zinc 0.984
Lab Sample ID: 1903737-00IEMSD Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared:
Iron 2.22
Lab Sample ID: 1903737-00lEMSD Date Analyzed:
Test Code: HG-DW-DIS-245.1 Date Prepared:
Mercury 0.00374
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
_QC SUMMARY REPORT
Units Method
04/09/2019 1734h
04/05/2019 1023h
mg/L E200.8
mg/L E200.8
04/10/2019 1530h
04/05/2019 1023h
mg/L E200.8
04/10/2019 834h
04/04/2019 1830h
mg/L E245.1
MDL
0.000176
0.00418
0.0992
0.0000396
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount
Limit Spiked
0.00200 0.2000
0.00600 1.000
0.200 1.000
0.0000900 0.003330
Tanner Holliday
ME
MSD
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
0.00491 95.5
0 98.4
1.2 102
0 112
2 -Analyte concentration is too high for accurate matrix spike recovery and/or RPD.
Limits
75 -125
75 -125
75 -125
85 -115
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPO Ref.
Amt %RPO
---
0.202 3.04
0.977 0.741
2.25 1.35
0.00364 2.67
RPD
Limit
20
20
20
20
Qual
Report Date: 4/11/2019 Page 17 of26
analyses applicable to the CWA, SOWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NE LAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnat1011 is located on the attached COC Confidential Business Information: TI1is report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use of tt
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be ,bTfanted only on contact This
ANALYTICAL
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1903737
Project: Annual Seeps and Springs 2019
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: 1903737-00ICDUP Date Analyzed:
Test Code: TDS-W-2540C
Total Dissolved Solids 1,110
Units
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone]. Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount
Method MDL Limit Spiked
Tanner Holliday
WC
DUP
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
03/29/2019 1145h
----
mg/L SM2540C 16.0 20.0
Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD Ref. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit
1110 0.360 5
Qual
Report Date: 4/11/2019 Page 18 of26
analyses applicable to the CWA. SOWA, and RCRA are perfom1ed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC Confidential Business lnfom1ation: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privlleges of subsequent use oft~
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1903737
Project: Annual Seeps and Springs 2019
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: LCS-Rl24526 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.74
Fluoride 4.97
Sulfate 5.11
Lab Sample ID: LCS-Rl24168 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: ALK-W-23208-LL
Alkalinity (as CaC03) 250
Lab Sample ID: LCS-61874 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: NH3-W-350. l Date Prepared: -----
Ammonia (as N) 10.8
Lab Sample ID: LCS-Rl24079 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.03
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone]. Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked
04/10/2019 1943h
--
mg/L E300.0 0.0386 0.100 5.000
mg/L E300.0 0.0240 0.100 5.000
mg/L E300.0 0.0557 0.750 5.000
04/02/2019 749h
mg/L SM2320B 0.781 1.00 250.0
04/09/2019 1646h
04/09/2019 123 5h -
mg/L E350,1 0.0492 0.0500 10.00
03/29/2019 1312h
--· --
mg/L E353.2 0.00363 0.0100 1.000
Tanner Holliday
WC
LCS
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
0 94.7
0 99.3
0 102
0 100
0 108
0 103
Lab Sample ID: LCS-RI24148 Date Analyzed: 03/29/2019 1145h
Test Code: TDS-W-2540C
Total Dissolved Solids 180 mg/L SM2540C 8.00 10.0 205.0 0 87.8
Limits
90 -110
90 -110
90 -110
90 -110
90 -110
90 -110
80 -120
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPO Ref. RPO
Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Report Date: 4/11/2019 Page 19 of 26
analyses applicable to the CWA. SOWA, and RCRA are perfom1ed in accordance to N ELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC Confidential Business Information: This repon is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use of ti·
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any pull)ose other than for the addressee \Vill be granted only on contact This
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1903737
Project: Arumal Seeps and Springs 2019
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: MB-Rl24526 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride < 0.100
Fluoride <0.100
Sulfate < 0.750
Lab Sample ID: MB-Rl24168 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: ALK-W-2320B-LL
Bicarbonate (as CaC03) < 1.00
Carbonate (as CaC03) < 1.00
Lab Sample ID: MB-61874 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: NH3-W-350. l Date Prepared:
Ammonia (as N) < 0.0500
Lab Sample ID: MB-R124079 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2 ------
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) < 0.0100
Lab Sample ID: MB-Rl24148 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: TDS-W-2540C
Total Dissolved Solids < 10.0
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone]. fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
_QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked
04/10/2019 1926h
-
mg.IL E300.0 0.0386 0.100
mg/L E300.0 0.0240 0.100
mg/L E300.0 0.0557 0.750
04/02/2019 749h
mg.IL SM2320B 0.781 1.00
mg.IL SM2320B 0.781 1.00
04/09/2019 1645h
04/09/2019 123 5h -
mg/L E350,l 0.0492 0.0500
03/29/2019 1310h
mg.IL E353.2 0.00363 0.0100
03/29/2019 1145h
mg/L SM2540C 8.00 10.0
Tanner Holliday
WC
MBLK
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Report Date: 4/11/2019 Page 20 of26
analyses applicable to the CWA. SOWA, and RCRA are perfom1ed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent samphng informat10n is located on the attached CO(' Confidential Busines~ lnfom1ation: This report is provided for the exclusive me of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use oft~
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of thls report in connection with the adve1tisement. promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1903737
Project: Arumal Seeps and Springs 2019
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: 1903737-00lBMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 502
Fluoride 480
Sulfate 947
Lab Sample ID: 1903737-00lBMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: ALK-W-23208-LL
Alkalinity (as CaC03) 1,450
Lab Sample ID: 1903737-00lDMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: NH3-W-350.I Date Prepared:
Ammonia (as N) 10.8
Lab Sample ID: 1903737-00lDMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2 ----
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 11.0
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone]. Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked
04/10/2019 2305h
---
mg/L E300.0 3.86 10.0 500.0
mg/L E300.0 2.40 10.0 500.0
mg/L E300.0 5.57 75.0 500.0
04/02/2019 749h
~
mg/L SM2320B 0.781 1.00 1,000
04/09/2019 1650h
04/09/2019 1235h -
mg/L E350.I 0.0492 0.0500 10.00
03/29/2019 1314h
----
mg/L E353.2 0.0363 0.100 10.00
Tanner Holliday
WC
MS
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
41.6 92.1
0 96.1
436 102
450 100
-
0 108
0 110
§ -QC limits are set with an accuracy of two significant figures, therefore the recovery rounds to an acceptable value within the control limits.
Limits
90 -110
90 -110
90 -110
80 -120
90-110
90 -110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD Ref. RPD
Amt %RPO Limit Qual
§
Report Date: 4/11 /2019 Page 21 of26
analyses applicable to the CWA. SOWA, and RCRA are perfom1ed in acco,d:mc.e to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infom1ation is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use oft~
TIC of this company or any member of its staft: or reproduction of this report in connection with the adve1'tisement promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone] Laboratory Director
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES _QC SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Lab Set ID: 1903737 Dept: WC
Project: Annual Seeps and Springs 2019 QC Type: MSD
----
Reporting Amount Spike Ref. RPO Ref. RPD
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC Limits Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Lab Sample ID: 1903737-00lBMSD Date Analyzed: 04/10/2019 2322h
Test Code: 300.0-W ---
Chloride 509 mg/L E300.0 3.86 10.0 500.0 41.6 93.5 90 -110 502 1.36 20
Fluoride 486 mg/L E300.0 2.40 10.0 500.0 0 97.2 90 -110 480 1.16 20
Sulfate 945 mg/L E300,0 5.57 75.0 500.0 436 102 90 -110 947 0.234 20
Lab Sample ID: 1903737-00lBMSO Date Analyzed: 04/02/2019 749h
Test Code: ALK-W-2320B-LL --
Alkalinity (as CaC03) 1,460 mg/L SM2320B 0.781 1.00 1,000 450 IOI 80 -120 1450 0.275 10
Lab Sample ID: 1903737-00IDMSO Date Analyzed: 04/09/2019 1651 h
Test Code: NH3-W-350.1 Date Prepared: 04/09/2019 1235h ------
Ammonia (as N) 10.7 mg/L E350.1 0.0492 0.0500 10.00 0 107 90 -110 10.8 0.929 10
Lab Sample ID: 1903737-00IDMSO Date Analyzed: 03/29/2019 1316h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2 -------
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10.6 mg/L E353.2 0.0363 0.100 10.00 0 106 90 -110 11 3.70 10
Report Date: 4/11/2019 Page 22 of26
analyses applicable to the CWA. SOWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infom1at1on is located on the attached COC Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the e;,,;clusive use of the addressee, Privileges of subsequent use of tl-
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1903737
Project: Annual Seeps and Springs 2019
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: LCS VOC-2 032919A Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 8260-W-DENIOO --
Benzene 20.7
Chlorofonn 19.8
Methylene chloride 20.0
Naphthalene 16.6
Tetrahydrofuran 16.1
Toluene 20.8
Xylenes, Total 66.9
Surr: l ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 46.6
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 49.5
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 50.2
Surr: Toluene-dB 51.8
Units
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone]. Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount
Method MDL Limit Spiked
Tanner Holliday
MSVOA
LCS
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
03/29/2019 743h
µg/L SW8260C 0.147 1.00 20.00 0 104
µg/L SW8260C 0.166 1.00 20.00 0 99.2
µg/L SW8260C 0.448 1.00 20.00 0 99.8
µg/L SW8260C 0.704 1.00 20.00 0 83.3
µg/L SW8260C 0.436 1.00 20.00 0 80.4
µg/L SW8260C 0.177 1.00 20.00 0 104
µg/L SW8260C 1.00 60.00 0 111
µg/L SW8260C 50.00 93.3
µg/L SW8260C 50.00 99.0
µg/L SW8260C 50.00 100
µg/L SW8260C 50.00 104
Limits
82 -132
85 -124
65 -154
63 -129
59 -125
69 -129
66 -124
80 -136
85 -121
78 -132
81 -123
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPO Ref. RPO
Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Report Date: 4/11/2019 Page 23 of26
analyses applicable to the CWA. SOWA, and RCRA are perfonned m accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infom1ation is located on the attached COC Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use of tt
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1903737
Project: Annual Seeps and Springs 2019
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: MB VOC-2 032919A Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 8260-W-DENJOO
2-Butanone <20.0
Acetone <20.0
Benzene < 1.00
Carbon tetrachloride < 1.00
Chloroform < 1.00
Chloromethane < 1.00
Methylene chloride < 1.00
Naphthalene < 1.00
Tetrahydrofuran < 1.00
Toluene < 1.00
Xylenes, Total < 1.00
Surr: l ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 47.9
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 53.4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 49.0
Surr: Toluene-d8 51.0 ---
Units
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone]. Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount
Method MDL Limit Spiked
Tanner Holliday
MSVOA
MBLK
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
03/29/2019 823h
µg/L SW8260C 1.31 20.0
µg/L SW8260C 2.87 20.0
µg/L SW8260C 0.147 1.00
µg/L SW8260C 0.262 1.00
µg/L SW8260C 0.166 1.00
µg/L SW8260C 0.832 1.00
µg/L SW8260C 0.448 1.00
µg/L SW8260C 0.704 1.00
µg/L SW8260C 0.436 1.00
µg/L SW8260C 0.177 1.00
µg/L SW8260C 1.00
µg/L SW8260C 50.00 95.9
µg/L SW8260C 50.00 107
µg/L SW8260C 50.00 98.0
µg/L SW8260C 50.00 102
Limits
80 -136
85 • 121
78 • 132
81 -123
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Report Date: 4/11/2019 Page 24 of26
analyses applicable to the CWA. SOWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infom1ation is located on the attached COC Confidential Business lnfom1ation: TI1is report is provlded for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of 5ubsequent use oft~
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1903737
Project: Annual Seeps and Springs 2019
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: 1903737-00lAMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 8260-W-DENIOO --
Benzene 21.3
Chloroform 20.5
Methylene chloride 20.5
Naphthalene 16.4
Tetrahydrofuran I 7.8
Toluene 21.5
Xylenes, Total 68.8
Surr: I ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 47.8
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 50.2
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 51.5
Surr: Toluene-d8 51.l
Units
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone]. fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount
Method MDL Limit Spiked
Tanner Holliday
MSVOA
MS
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
03/29/2019 1319h
~ --
µg/L SW8260C 0.147 1.00 20.00 0 107
µg/L SW8260C 0.166 1.00 20.00 0 103
µg/L SW8260C 0.448 1.00 20.00 0 103
µg/L SW8260C 0.704 1.00 20.00 0 81.8
µg/L SW8260C 0.436 100 20.00 0 89.2
µg/L SW8260C 0.177 1.00 20.00 0 108
µg/L SW8260C 1.00 60.00 0 115
µg/L SW8260C 50.00 95.7
µg/L SW8260C 50.00 100
µg/L SW8260C 50.00 103
µg/L SW8260C 50.00 102
Limits
66 -145
50 -146
30 -192
41 -131
43 -146
18 -192
42 -167
72-151
80 -152
72 -135
80-124 ----
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPO Ref. RPO
Amt %RPO Limit Qual
ReportDate: 4/11/2019 Page25of26
analyses applicable to the CWA. SOWA, and RCRA are perfom1ed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached CO(' Confidential Business lnfom1ation: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use oft~
ne of this company or any member of its stat{ or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
LabSetID: 1903737
Project: Annual Seeps and Springs 2019
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: 1903737-00IAMSD Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 8260-W-DENIOO
Benzene 20.8
Chloroform 20.0
Methylene chloride 20.0
Naphthalene 15.9
Tetrahydrofuran 18.7
Toluene 20.8
Xylenes, Total 66.5
Surr: I ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 47.3
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 49.5
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 50.4
Surr: Toluene-d8 50.5
Units
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84 I 19
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT_
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount
Method MDL Limit Spiked
Tanner Holliday
MSVOA
MSD
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
03/29/2019 1339h
----
µg/L SW8260C 0.147 1.00 20.00 0 104
µg/L SW8260C 0.166 1.00 20.00 0 100
µg/L SW8260C 0.448 1.00 20.00 0 100
µg/L SW826DC 0.704 1.00 20.00 0 79.4
µg/L SW8260C 0.436 1.00 20.00 0 93.5
µg/L SW8260C 0.177 1.00 20.00 0 104
µg/L SW8260C 1.00 60.00 0 111
µg/L SW8260C 50.00 94.6
µg/L SW8260C 50.00 99.0
µg/L SW826DC 50.00 101
µg/L SW826DC 50.00 IOI
Limits
66 -145
50 -146
30 -192
41 -131
43 -146
18 -192
42 -167
72 -151
80 -152
72 -135
80 -124
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPO Ref. RPO
Amt %RPO Limit
21.3 2.42 25
20.5 2.52 25
20.5 2.32 25
16.4 3.10 25
17.8 4.71 25
21.5 3.26 25
68.8 3.36 25
Qual
Report Date: 4/11 /2019 Page 26 of26
analyses applicable to the CWA. SOWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent samphng infomiation is located on the attached COC Confidential Business lnfonnation: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use of tt
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with there-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
American West Analytical Laboratories
WORK ORDER Summary
Client:
Client ID:
Project:
Comments:
Sample ID
1903737-00lA
1903737-00lB
1903737-00lC
1903737-00lD
1903737-00IE
1903737-002A
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
ENE300 Contact:
Annual Seeps and Springs 2019 QC Level:
QC 3 (no chromatograms). EDD-Denison. CC [e-mail].;
Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date
Westwater Seep 3/27/2019 0930h 3/29/2019 1000h
Trip Blank 3/27/2019 0930h 3/29/2019 1 OOOh
Tanner Holliday
III
Rpt Emailed:
WorkOrder: 1903737
Due Date: 4/12/2019
WO Type: Project
UL
Denison
Page 1 of 1
~
Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
8260-W-DENlOO Aqueous VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-DENJOO; # of Analytes: 11 I# ojSurr: 4
300.0-W df-wc
3 SEL Analytes: CL F S04
ALK-W-2320B-LL df-wc
2 SEL Analytes: ALKB ALKC
TDS-W-2540C df-tds
1 SEL Analytes: TDS
NHJ-W-350.1 df -no2/no3 & nh3
1 SEL Analytes: NH3N
NH3-W-PR df -no2/no3 & nh3
N02/N03-W-353.2 df -no2/no3 & nh3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
200.7-DIS df-met
5 SEL Analytes: CA MG K NA V
200. 7-DIS-PR df-met
200.8-DIS df-met
17 SEL Analytes: AS BE CD CR CO CU FE PB MN MO NJ SE AG
TLSNUZN
200.8-DIS-PR df-met
HG-DW-DIS-245.1 df-met
1 SEL Analytes: HG
HG-DW-DIS-PR df-met
IONBALANCE df-met
5 SEL Analytes: BALANCE Anions Cations TDS-Balance TDS-Calc
8260-W-DENlOO Aqueous VOCFridge 3
Test Group_: 8260-W-DENJOO; # of Analytes: 11 I# ojSurr: 4
Printed: 03/29/19 11:14 LABORATORY CHECK: %M O RT D CN O TAT O QC O LUO 0 HOK ___ HOK __ _ HOK___ COG Emailed:.._ ___ _
3 :
5
6
i
i
8
9
10 I
12 :
Address:
Contact:
Phone#:
Email:
Project Name:
Project#:
PO#:
Sampler Name:
Westwater Seep
Trip Blank
American West
Analytical Laboratories
463 W. 3600 S. Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone# [phone] Toll Free# [phone]
6425 S. Hwy. 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Tanner Holliday
[phone] Cell#:
[e-mail]; [e-mail];
thollidaEne!lllfuels.com
Annual Seeps and Springs 2019
Tanner Holliday
Date
Sample ID: Sampled
1
3/27/2019
3/27/2019
Rollnq\.ts!)ed oy:
~,1/11')1,.-~~f Dale!
Sl!lnalln 3128120H u Timre
PmtNilme: TaMer Holffri>v ,,ao
Re!lrqtdshed by. Date; --[Tm,e:
PrtnlN""""
Relinquished by: Date:
'""'nalu-e
Time:
Print Name:
Relinquished by: Date:
L~nnalU'e
Time:
PrintN.arne:
Time
Sampled
930
930
Received by:
Sia nature
Prin!Name:
Received by:
Slanature
Print Name:
Recehled by:
Sionature
PrlnlName:
ReceiVe<lby:
Slanalure .,
PriatName·-
I
CHAIN OF CUSTODY 190~?61
All analysis will be comlucted using NELAP accre<lted methods aml all data wlll be reported using AWAL's standard analyte lists and
reporting limilS {PQL) ooless specifically requested olherwise oo this Chain or Custody and/or attac!led docm,entatlon.
AWAL Lab Sample Set#
Page 1 of 1
QC Level: I Tum Around Time: Unless other arrangements have been made, 1°"11' I -z-\ \ 9 I signed reports will be emailed by 5:00 pm on
3 Standard the day they are due.
X Include EDD: Laboratory Use Only
0 LOCUS UPLOAD
ISam~~w~~ ~ ::;: al u EXCEL on bD X Field Filtered For: -... tt: ::;: Dissolved Metals 1 ~ hand <ID!lVe<ed .... i:::· v:i ::;: :i
2 Amblenlo~ 'I-C"l .0 ci ~ p.. z For Compliance With: a TemperallJre Or3 c:; ci j 0 NELAP 'C 0 0 RCRA o' C"l ;:i ::,.· D CWA 4 Received Broken/leaking C) ~ 0 c:; u :i' 0 SOWA {Improperly Seal~ -... "l a 0 0 El.AP / A2LA y N .... ... ~ i:::· c:i tl. u 0 a (/J 0 NLLAP c;-lJ) a C"l .. .... 0 Non-Compliance 5 0""Y Preserved "l a "l ] u ~:: l;j ... 1/) tl. ,d 0 Other: . y N 0 :::t. 4D i D' ~ !2.. \J D' ,e :.: u cu a Checked at bench
)( a """ a "' Cl IO y N C: ·c: (') 0 0 ;Ji Cl '1::1 .; .; ; C'l ~ iu 0 1/) fll a cu C!l (/J ~ Known Hazards 6 Received Within ::;; Ii!; :::t. tl. .:: .; 0 " ...... 0 ...... 0 rti i ~ .. g~nmes u C. 8 (') fll = .. < u & 0 E = s ~ .!l II 0 N ., 0 Samele Comments "" en Ii!; I!'; u 1:1 ... >
7 w X ; .;;: X" X X X X X X
ft \ ' \">'.:v~ 3 w X ~w:,-J""' . . N
2&er, on Outer P y N I
3 Present on Sample 0
Y N NA
·"
4 Unbroken on sample ·A
Y N , NA
-
Discrepancies Between Sample
y N Labels and COC Recc<~
Dale: Special Instructions:
lme:
Sample containers for metals were field filtered. See the Date: Analytical Scope of Work for Reporting Limits and voe analyte
Time: list.
Dale:
Time: -A .
)o AL o'.f\~ ~~>,. 1AJ D~lz_ql \9
--:)(?'->-j{\\tgz_ -g.('( 1\.) .. 'C"°I rnmel ff\ :'co
Analysis
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
N02/N03
O&G
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TP04
CrVI+
Procedure:
Frequency:
Preservation Check Sheet
s amo le Set E
Preservative f-OOl
pH<2 H2S04 "o~ pH <2H2S04
pH>12NaOH
pH<2HN03 ,'P4
pH<2H2S04 ·, R,.J
pH<2HCL
pH<2 H2S04
pH>9NaOH,
Zn Acetate
pH<2H2S04
pl-1<2 H2S04
pH>9
(NH4)iSQ4
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
doH
l)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
If sample is not preserved, properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag COC, notify client ifrequested
Place client conversation on COC
Samples may be adjusted
All samples requiring preservation
*
+
•
#
•
The sample required additional preservative upon receipt.
The sample was received unpreserved.
The sample was received unpreserved and therefore preserved upon receipt.
The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH < 2 due to the sample matrix.
The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH> __ due to the sample matrix interference .
Lab Set ID:
pH Lot#:
\ qo3J~]
59,ID
l!;l 4 • Labo rato ries LLc
a member of The GEL Group INC
PO Box 3'0712 Cria~ e,wn SC 29417
2040 Smg~ Road Cha~eston SC 29407
P 843.556.8171
P 84'.l.766.1178
April 26, 2019
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Re: Analytical for Annual Seeps and Spring 2019
Work Order: 475027
Dear Ms. Weinel:
GEL Laboratories, LLC (GEL) appreciates the opportunity to provide the enclosed analytical results for the
sample(s) we received on April 01 , 2019. This revised data report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance
with GEL's standard operating procedures. This package has been revised to show correct method.
Test results for NELAP or ISO 17025 accredited tests are verified to meet the requirements of those standards,
with any exceptions noted. The results reported relate only to the items tested and to the sample as received by
the laboratory. These results may not be reproduced except as full reports without approval by the laboratory.
Copies ofGEL's accreditations and certifications can be found on our website at www.gel.com.
Our policy is to provide high quality, personalized analytical services to enable you to meet your analytical needs
on time every time. We trust that you will find everything in order and to your satisfaction. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 4289.
Purchase Order: DW16138
Enclosures
Sincerely,
~~~
Juli.e Robin on
Project Manager
mt 1111111 1m~ 11111111 !' 1111111111
gel.co m
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Analytical for
SDG: 475027
This package has been revised to show correct method.
April 26, 2019
Laboratory Identification:
GEL Laboratories LLC
2040 Savage Road
Charleston, South Carolina 29407
[phone]
Summary:
Receipt Narrative
for
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
SDG: 475027
Sample receipt: The sample arrived at GEL Laboratories LLC, Charleston, South Carolina on April 01, 2019
for analysis. The sample was delivered with proper chain of custody documentation and signatures. All sample
containers arrived without any visible signs of tampering or breakage. There are no additional comments
concerning sample receipt.
Sample Identification: The laboratory received the following sample:
Laboratory ID Client ID
475027001 Westwater Seep
Case Narrative:
Sample analyses were conducted using methodology as outlined in GEL's Standard Operating Procedures. Any
technical or administrative problems during analysis, data review, and reduction are contained in the analytical
case narratives in the enclosed data package.
The enclosed data package contains the following sections: Case Narrative, Chain of Custody, Cooler Receipt
Checklist, Data Package Qualifier Definitions and data from the following fractions: Radiochemistry.
~~S;-
Julie Robinson
Project Manager
Sheet 1 of 1
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Samples Shipped to: _G_e_l _La_b_o_ra_t_o_rie_s _________ Contact: Tanner Holliday
2040 Savage Road Ph: 435 678 4115
Charleston, SC 29407 [e-mail]
Chain of Custody/Sampling Analysis Request
p . t ro1ec s amp ers N ame s amp ers Si 1gnature
Annual Seeps and Spring L \,, 12.nJJ, . .JUl-:1. 1 2019 Tanner Holliday
,./
Time
Sample ID Date Collected Collected Laboratory Analysis Requested
Westwater seep 3/27/2019 930 Gross Alpha
Comments:
A..JJ/,fa
Relinquished By:(Signature) Datemme Received By:(Signature) Daterr e
~~niJ.~-1
3/28/2019 ~ .8i{a~ 1130
Relinquished By:(Signature) V Date/Time Receive~ignature) Date/Time
r.:r.:1'111 i "t)nr::1'torio" ' ' ,. ~ Ld v1\.l ,,v0 1!..'.._.
Cllcqt:
Received By: ZKW
Carrier and Tracking Number
Sus1>cctcd I-lazord Information
A)Ship ed as a DOT Hazardous'/
B) Did the client designate the samples are lo be
received as radioactive?
C) Did the RSO classil)' the samples as
radioactive?
D) Did the client designate samples arc
hazardons?
E) Did the RSO identi fv ossiblc hazards'/
Sample Receipt Criteria
Shipping containers received intact and
scaled?
2 Chain of custody documents included
with shi mcnt?
3 Samples requiring cold preservation
within (0 5 6 deg. C)?*
4 Daily check performed and passed on IR
tcmperoture gun'
5 Sample containers intact and scaled?
6 Samples requiring chemical preservation
i1t proper pH?
7 Do any samples require Volatile
Analysis?
8 Snm1ilcs received within holding time?
9 Sample ID's on COC match ID's on
boulcs?
10 Date & time on COC match date & time
on bottles?
11 Number of containers received match
nu111bcr indicated on COC?
12
13 COC form is properly signed in
rcllnquishcd/rccoivccl sections?
Comments (Use Con1inu:,1ion Fann if needed):
SAMPLE RECEIPT & REVlEW FORM
SDG/AIUCOC/WorkOr er: '-/ 1 c= D~ l
Date Received:
FedEx Express
Circ~lo:
FedEx Ground e;Field Services Courier Other
tc
~ -:_ •JrNct Counts > IOOcpm on samples not marked "radioactive". contact the Radiation Safety Group for funher investigation.
Hnwrd Class Shipped: UN#:
fUN2910, Is the Radioactive Shipment Survey Compliant? Yes_ No_
RCRA Asbestos Beryllium Other:
Comments/Qualifiers (Required for Non-Conforming Items)
Cude Applicable: ScoJs broken Dmm1yc<l (:Ontniucr L\lnL:in~ container 01hc.r (dll!Stlriba)
Ciro!c ,\pplicoblc: Client comactcd ,nd provided COC
Prcservntion Method: Wet Ice Ice Packs Dry ice
•all lcmpcratures are recorded in Celsius
Tcm11cr11turc De\'icc Serini II: IR3-1B
Secondary Temperature Device Serial II (If Applicable):
COC <r<>tcd upon r«cipt
Cir-c:h,: Applicable: Sc"b brok~n DamiJgcd Cl1nlaincr Lc:1krng conrniner Other {describe)
Somrtc ID'~ ond Conto1ncrs Alf<o1od:
TEMP: L-/ ., L.
Do liquid VOA vials conrnin ncid preservation? Yes __ No_ NA __ (lfunknown, select No)
1 re liquid VOA vials free ofhcnd~1incc? Yes_ No_ NA_
10·~ nnd tests ~ncctcd:
ID's nnd containers nffcctctl:
Circle Applicable: 'o dntcs on containers No times on containers COC missing info Other (describe)
Circle Af)plicnblc: No container count on COC Other (describe)
Circle Applicable: 'nt relinquished Other (dw:ribc)
GL-CHL-SR-001 Rev 6
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
GEL Work Order/SDG: 475027
Client SDG: 475027
Annual Seeps and Spring 2019
Project Manager:
Project Name:
Purchase Order:
Package Level:
EDD Format:
Julie Robinson
DNMI00106 Analytical for
DW16138
LEVEL3
EIM_DNMI
GELID Client Sample ID Client Sample Desc.
Collect
Date & Time
Work Order Due Date: 29-APR-19
Package Due Date: 27-APR-19
EDD Due Date:
QA Due Date:
tJAtitt>ate:
Receive Time # of
Date & Time Zone Cont.
29-APR-19
29-APR-19
30-APR-19
Lab
Matrix
Report Date: 26-APR-19
Work Order: 475027
Page 1 of 2
Collector: C
Prelogin #: 20190486669
Project Workdef ID: 1329132
SDG Status: Closed
Logged by:
Fax Days to
Due Date Process CofC#
Prelog Lab Field
Group QC QC
475027001 Westwater Seep 27-MAR-19 09:30 01-APR-19 08:55 -2 GROUND WATER 20
Client Sample ID
-001 Westwater Seep
Status Tests/Methods
REVW GFPC, Total Alpha Radium,
Liquid
Product
Reference
Gross Alpha
Fax Date PM Comments Aux Data
Product: GFCTORAL Workdef ID: 1461303 In Product Group? No Group Name: Group Reference:
Method: EPA 903.0
Product Description: GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid
Samples: 001
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS#
Contingent
Tests
Parmname
Gross Radium Alpha
Action Product Name
Login Requirements:
Requirement
Description
Path: Drinking Water (903.0 or 9315)
Product Reference: Gross Alpha
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Client RDL or
PQL & Unit
Reporting Parm Included Included Custom
Units Function in Sample? in QC? List?
pCi/L REG y y No
Samples
Include? Comments
Receive
Codes
(
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
Peer Review by:, ___________ _ Work Order (SDG#), PO# Checked? ____ _
Report Date: 26-APR-19
Work Order:475027
Page 2 of 2
C of C signed in receiver location? _____ _
List of current GEL Certifications as of 26 April 2019
State Certification
Alaska 17-018
Arkansas 88-0651
CLIA 42D0904046
California 2940
Colorado SC00012
Connecticut PH-0169
DoD ELAP/ ISOl 7025 A2LA 2567.01
Florida NELAP E87156
Foreign Soils Pennit P330-15-00283,P330-15-00253
Georgia SC00012
Georgia SDWA 967
Hawaii SC00012
Idaho SC00012
Illinois NELAP 200029
Indiana C-SC-01
Kansas NELAP E-10332
Kentucky SDWA 90129
Kentucky Wastewater 90129
Louisiana NELAP 03046 (AI33904)
Louisiana SDWA LA024
Maryland 270
Massachusetts M-SC012
Michigan 9976
Mississippi SC00012
Nebraska NE-OS-26-13
Nevada scooo 122019-3
New Hampshire NELAP 2054
New Jersey NELAP SC002
New Mexico SC00012
New York NELAP 11501
North Carolina 233
North Carolina SDWA 45709
North Dakota R-158
Oklahoma 9904
Pennsylvania NELAP 68-00485
Puerto Rico SC00012
S. Carolina Radiochem 10120002
South Carolina Chemistry 10120001
Tennessee TN 02934
TexasNELAP Tl04704235-19-15
UtahNELAP SC000122018-27
Vermont VT87156
Virginia NELAP 460202
Washington C780
Radiochemistry
Technical Case Narrative
Energy Fuels Resources (DNMI)
SDG #: 475027
Product: GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid
Analytical Method: EPA 903.0
Analytical Procedure: GL-RAD-A-044 REV# IO
Analytical Batch: 1863376
The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s).
GEL Sample ID#
475027001
1204251123
1204251124
1204251125
1204251126
1204251127
Client Sam pie Identification
Westwater Seep
Method Blank (MB)
47502700l(Westwater Seep) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
47502700l(Westwater Seep) Matrix Spike (MS)
47502700l(Westwater Seep) Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.
Data Summary:
All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and
procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where
applicable, with the following exceptions.
Preparation Information
Aliquot Reduced
Aliquots were reduced due to limited sample volume.
Miscellaneous Information
Additional Comments
The matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate, 1204251125 (Westwater SeepMS) and 1204251126 (Westwater
SeepMSD), aliquots were reduced to conserve sample volume.
Certification Statement
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Qualifier Definition Report
for
DNMI001 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Client SDG: 475027 GEL Work Order: 475027
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria ** Analyte is a surrogate compound
U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
Review/Validation
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data reviewer. In addition, all CLP-like deliverables
receive a third level review of the fractional data package.
The following data validator verified the information presented in this data report:
Signature: J~ ~
Date: 26 APR 2019
Name: Theresa Austin
Title: Group Leader
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Workorder:
Parmname
Rad Gas Flow
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado
Ms. Kathy Weinel
475027
3atch 1863376
QC1204251124 475027001 DUP
Gross Radium Alpha
QC1204251127 LCS
Gross Radium Alpha
QCl204251123 MB
Gross Radium Alpha
QC1204251125 475027001 MS
Gross Radium Alpha
QC1204251126 475027001 MSD
Gross Radium Alpha
Notes:
NOM
u
Uncertainty
887
Uncertainty
Uncertainty
4450 u
Uncertainty
4450 u
Uncertainty
Sam le
0.232 U
+/-0.270
0.232
+/-0.270
0.232
+/-0.270
u
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (I-sigma).
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
**
<
>
Analyte is a surrogate compound
Result is less than value reported
Result is greater than value reported
The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product
0.721
+/-0.313
780
+/-10.1
0.249
+/-0.282
3780
+/-52.1
3720
+/-50.7
pCi/L NIA
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L 1.45
A
B
BO
C
D
F
H
K
L
M
For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank.
Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low
Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis
Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample
Estimated Value
Analytical holding time was exceeded
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actual value is expected to be lower.
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low. Actual value is expected to be higher.
M if above MDC and less than LLD
Reoort Date: April 26, 2019
Page 1 of
REC% Ran e Anlst -----" Date Time
NIA JXC9 04/05/19 12:2
87.9 (75%-125%) 04/05/19 12:2
04/05/19 12:2
84.8 (75%-125%) 04/05/19 12:2
83.5 (0%-20%) 04/05/19 12:2
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 475027
Parmname NOM RPO% REC%_----'RC..Ca"'-nge Anlst
M Matrix Related Failure
NIA RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.
NI
ND
NJ
Q
R
u
UI
UJ
UL
X
y
I\
h
See case narrative
Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER.
Sample results are rejected
Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification
Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification
Not considered detected. The associated number is the reported concentration, which may be inaccurate due to a low bias.
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
QC Samples were not spiked with this compound
RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +I-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.
Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded
Page 2 of
Date Time
NIA indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike cone. by a factor of 4 or more or %RPO not applicable.
/\ The Relative Percent Difference (RPO) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater than
five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is Jess than 5X the RL, a control limit of +I-the
RL is used to evaluate the DUP result.
* Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.
For PS, PSD, and SDIL T results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.
Tanner Holliday
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 South Hwy 191
American West Blanding, UT 84511
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
3440 South 700 West
;;alt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone:[phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: (80 I) 263-8687
~-mail : [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Jabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
TEL: ( 435) 678-2221
RE: Seeps and Springs 2019
Dear Tanner Holliday: Lab Set ID: 1906343
American West Analytical Laboratories received sample(s) on 6/13/2019 for the analyses
presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AW AL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) in Utah and Texas; and is
state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, Wyoming, and Missouri.
All analyses were performed in accordance to the NELAP protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation scope documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation '1Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The ''Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
Thank You,
Digitally signed by Jose G.
J OS e G ~~c~~=Jose G. Rocha,
• o=American West Analytical
Laboratories, ou, RO Ch a ~:~[e-mail],
Date: 2019.07.05 14:33:52 Approved by: -os·oo·
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 7/5/2019 Page I of35
All annl~ ses applicable lo lhe CWA. SOWA. and RCRA me perfom,ed in accordance to NELAC p1otocols Pertinent sampling i11forrnn1ion is locnted on Lhe attached COC Confide1111al Business Information: This repor1 is prm 1ded for 1he exclusi\"e use of the
~ddressee Pri, ile~es o: sub~seq~enl ~1~e or the ~~e of this .coi~pm1~ or M) 1~mbe1 of its slaff. or reproduclio~ ~! ll1is I epo~ in ,co11~1ec1ion~ \\ill1 lhe a~, ertisemenl p~omolio.n 01 sale of :U!~ ~1odl~L or p1,ocess, ~r in ~onn;c!im1 w!lh th; r;:publicntio11 of this report
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Project: Seeps and Springs 2019
Lab Set ID: 1906343
Date Received: 6/13/2019 1054h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
3440 South 700 West
1906343-00 IA Entrance Seep 6/11/2019 815h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
,altLakeCity,UT 84119 8260C/5030C
1906343-001B Entrance Seep 6/11/2019 815h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1906343-001B Entrance Seep 6/11/2019 815h Aqueous Alkalinity/ Bicarbonate/
Carbonate, Low Level
Phone: [phone] 1906343-001 C Entrance Seep 6/11/2019 815h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
Toll Free: [phone] 1906343-001 D Entrance Seep 6/11/2019 815h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Fax: [phone] 1906343-001D Entrance Seep 6/11/2019 815h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
~-mail: [e-mail] 1906343-00 lE Entrance Seep 6/11/2019 815h Aqueous Mercury, Drinking Water
Dissolved
web: www.awal-labs.com 1906343-00 lE Entrance Seep 6/11/2019 815h Aqueous Ion Balance
1906343-00 lE Entrance Seep 6/11/2019 815h Aqueous ICP Metals, Dissolved
1906343-00lE Entrance Seep 6/11/2019 815h Aqueous ICPMS Metals, Dissolved
Kyle F. Gross l 906343-002A Ruin Spring 6/11/2019 850h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Laboratory Director 1906343-0028 Ruin Spring 6/11/2019 850h Aqueous Alkalinity/ Bicarbonate/
Carbonate, Low Level
Jose Rocha 1906343-0028 Ruin Spring 6/11/2019 850h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
QA Officer l 906343-002C Ruin Spring 6/11/2019 850h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
l 906343-002D Ruin Spring 6/11/2019 850h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
l 906343-002D Ruin Spring 6/11/2019 850h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
l 906343-002E Ruin Spring 6/11/2019 850h Aqueous Mercury, Drinking Water
Dissolved
l 906343-002E Ruin Spring 6/11/2019 850h Aqueous Ion Balance
l 906343-002E Ruin Spring 6/11/2019 850h Aqueous ICP Metals, Dissolved
l 906343-002E Ruin Spring 6/11/2019 850h Aqueous ICPMS Metals, Dissolved
l 906343-003A Cottonwood Spring 6/11/2019 950h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1906343-0038 Cottonwood Spring 6/11/2019 950h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1906343-0038 Cottonwood Spring 6/11/2019 950h Aqueous Alkalinity/ Bicarbonate/
Carbonate, Low Level
l 906343-003C Cottonwood Spring 6/11/2019 950h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
l 906343-003D Cottonwood Spring 6/11/2019 950h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
l 906343-003D Cottonwood Spring 6/11/2019 950h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
l 906343-003E Cottonwood Spring 6/11/2019 950h Aqueous Mercury, Drinking Water
Dissolved
l 906343-003E Cottonwood Spring 6/11/2019 950h Aqueous Ion Balance
Report Date: 7/5/2019 Page 2 of35
All analyses applicnble Lo lhe CWA. SDWA and RCRA we performed in accordance Lo NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling inrormalion is located on the allnched COC Confidential Business Information: This 1epor1 is provided for lhe exclusi,-e use of the
~ddressee P1i, ile~es o.r sub~seq~ent ~1~e of the ~~e of 1his
0
cm~pan)· or ffil)" 1~mbe1 of its stnff. or re1)roductio1~ ~f this repo~ in ~011~1eclion~ \\ilh the a~, ertisement p~omolio.n 4:r sale of !"l). ~1 od~cl or p1:ocess, ~r in ~onn:_c~ion "~lh lh~ r:-publication or this report
3440 South 700 West
;alt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: (80 I) 263-8687
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Client:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Date Received:
Lab Sample ID
l 906343-003E
l 906343-003E
1906343-004A
l 906343-004B
l 906343-004B
1906343-004C
l 906343-004D
1906343-004D
l 906343-004E
l 906343-004E
1906343-004E
1906343-004E
1906343-00SA
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Seeps and Springs 2019
1906343
6/13/2019 1054h
Client Sample ID
Cottonwood Spring
Cottonwood Spring
Back Spring
Back Spring
Back Spring
Back Spring
Back Spring
Back Spring
Back Spring
Back Spring
Back Spring
Back Spring
Trip Blank
Contact: Tanner Holliday
Date Collected Matrix Analysis
6/11/2019 950h Aqueous ICP Metals, Dissolved
6/11/2019 950h Aqueous ICPMS Metals, Dissolved
6/11/2019 850h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
6/11/2019 850h Aqueous Alkalinity/ Bicarbonate/
Carbonate, Low Level
6/11/2019 850h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
6/11/2019 850h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
6/11/2019 850h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
6/11/2019 850h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
6/11/2019 850h Aqueous Ion Balance
6/11/2019 850h Aqueous ICP Metals, Dissolved
6/11/2019 850h Aqueous ICPMS Metals, Dissolved
6/11/2019 850h Aqueous Mercury, Drinking Water
Dissolved
6/11/2019 815h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Report Date: 7/5/2019 Page 3 of35
All nnnl)ses applicoble lo the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA ate performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling i11for111ation is located on Lhe attached COC Confidential Business Information: This report is prmided for lhe exclusi\e use or the
~ddressee P1i\ ile~es o.f sub .. seq~enl ~~e of the ~?1:"e of this.co1~pa11y or M) 1~mbe1 of its stnfT, or reproducti~ ~f1his repo~ in ~on!'echon~ \\ilh the o.~, ertisemenl, p~omo1io
0
n or sale of~!~ ~rod1!cl or p1
0
ocess, ?r in ~ru1~~ion "!lh lh~ r:-publicntion of lhis 1eporl
3440 South 700 West
,alt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone:[phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: (80 I) 263-8687
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Inorganic Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Tanner Holliday
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
Seeps and Springs 2019
1906343
6/13/2019
6/11/2019
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation of all
samples were performed within the method holding times. All samples were properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, DUP:
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike / Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, with the
following exceptions:
Sample ID Analyte QC Explanation
190343-002E Calcium MS/MSD High analyte concentrations
190343-002E Magnesium MS/MSD High analyte concentrations
190343-002E Sodium MS/MSD High analyte concentrations
1906343-000lD Ammonia MS/MSD Sample matrix interference
Duplicate (DUP): The parameters that required a duplicate analysis had RPDs
within the control limits, with the following exception: The RPD for TDS on
sample 1906343-00lC was outside of control limits due to suspected sample non-
homogeneity or matrix interference.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 7/5/2019 Page 4 of35
All an.ti) ses applicable to lhe CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance Lo NELAC protocols Peninenl sampling information is localed on the atlached CDC Confidential Business Information: This report is prm ided for the exclLLSi\ e use of the
~cldressee P1i, ile~es o.r sub,_seq~enl ~1~e ol the ~'.":'1e of this
0
COJ~pan) or ru1) 1~mber of its slaff. or reproductio1~ ~r 1his repo~ in .con~ecl,on~ \\ilh 1he n~, ertisement. p~omolio.n m sale or ?1~) ~· od~cl or p1.ocess, ~r in ~onn~c.Lion \\'(th 1h~ r~·publicalion or this report
Volatile Case Narrative
American West Client: ANALYTICAL LA80RATORIE8 Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Tanner Holliday
3440 South 700 West
;alt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: (80 I) 263-8686
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax : [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Contact:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
Method:
Analysis:
Seeps and Springs 2019
1906343
6/13/2019
6/11/2019
Intact
None
SW-846 8260C/5030C
Volatile Organic Compounds
General Set Comments: One target analyte was observed above its reporting limit.
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: All samples were received in appropriate
containers and properly preserved. The analysis and preparation of all samples were
performed within the method holding times following the methods stated on the analytical
reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPO, and Surrogates:
Method Blanks (MBs): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCSs): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike/ Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Surrogates: All surrogate recoveries were within established limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 7/5/2019 Page 5 of 35
All anol~·ses applicable lo the CWA_ SDWA. and RCRA are perfom1ed in accordance to NELAC p1olocols Pertinenl sampling informnt,on is located on the attached COC Conlidentinl Business Jnformalion: This report is provided for the exclusi\e use or the
~ddressee Pri\ ile~es o_f sub..5eq~nl ~1~e of Lhe ~~e of lh1s .con_1pcm~ or M~ n.2_7mbe1 or its slnff, or reµroductio.~ ~rthis repo~ in ~ot~lection,. \\ilh the~' ertiseme11L. p~omotio.n ~r sale or:"!~ ~rod~ct or p1.ocess, ~fin 7°nn~c~ion w!lh 1h~ r~-publiciltion or !his repor1
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone]. Fax: [phone] Laboratory Director
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
American West _QC SUMMARY REPORT ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Lab Set ID: 1906343 Dept: ME
Project: Seeps and Springs 2019 QC Type: LCS ----------
Reporting Amount Spike Ref. RPD Ref. RPD
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC Limits Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Lab Sample ID: LCS-63253 Date Analyzed: 06/28/2019 1505h
Test Code: 200.7-DIS Date Prepared: 06/14/2019 1410h
Calcium 10.7 mg/L E200.7 0.0937 1.00 10.00 0 107 85 • 115
Magnesium 11.2 mg/L E200.7 0.0439 1.00 10.00 0 112 85 -115
Potassium 10.9 mg/L E200.7 0.134 1.00 10.00 0 109 85 -115
Sodium 11.3 mg/L E200.7 0.187 1.00 10.00 0 113 85 -115
Vanadium 0.220 mg/L E200.7 0.00138 0.00500 0.2000 0 110 85 • 115
Lab Sample ID: LCS-63254 Date Analyzed: 06/17/2019 1339h
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared: 06/14/20191410h
Arsenic 0.211 mg/L E200.8 0.000298 0.00200 0.2000 0 106 85 -115
Beryllium 0.209 mg/L E200.8 0.000198 0.00200 0.2000 0 105 85 -115
Cadmium 0.207 mg/L E200.8 0.0000858 0.000500 0.2000 0 103 85 -115
Chromium 0.213 mg/L E200.8 0.00191 0.00200 0.2000 0 107 85 -115
Cobalt 0.210 mg/L E200.8 0.000300 0.00400 0.2000 0 105 85 -115
Copper 0.214 mg/L E200.8 0.00282 0.00200 0.2000 0 107 85 -115
Iron 1.05 mg/L E200.8 0.0496 0.100 1.000 0 105 85 -115
Lead 0.199 mg/L E200 8 0.000448 0.00200 0.2000 0 99.3 85 -115
Manganese 0.215 mg/L E200.8 0.00108 0.00200 0.2000 0 108 85 -115
Molybdenum 0.213 mg/L E200.8 0.000652 0.00200 0.2000 0 106 85 -115
Nickel 0.211 mg/L E200.8 0.00148 0.00200 0.2000 0 105 85 -115
Selenium 0.220 mg/L E200.8 0.000574 0.00200 0.2000 0 110 85 -115
Silver 0.201 mg/L E200.8 0.000232 0.00200 0.2000 0 100 85 -115
Thallium 0.197 mg/L E200.8 0.000154 0.00200 0.2000 0 98.6 85 -115
Tin 1.05 mg/L E200.8 0.00116 0.00400 1.000 0 105 85 -115
Uranium 0.211 mg/L E200.8 0.000176 0.00200 0.2000 0 105 85 -115 -Lab Sample ID: LCS-63254 Date Analyzed: 06/17/2019 1924h
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared: 06/14/2019 1410h
Zinc 1.02 mg/L E200.8 0.00418 0.00600 1.000 0 102 85 -115
Report Date: 7/5/2019 Page 19 of35
analyses applicable to the CWA. SOWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NE LAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC Confidential Business lnfonnation: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use of tl-
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be blfanted only on contact This
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1906343
Project: Seeps and Springs 20 I 9
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: LCS-63387 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: HG-DW-DIS-245.1 Date Prepared:
Mercury 0.00317
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone]. Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
_QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked
06/24/2019 746h
06/21 /2019 1450h
mg/L E245.l 0.0000396 0.0000900 0.003330
Tanner Holliday
ME
LCS
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
0 95.2
Limits
85 -115
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPO Ref. RPO
Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Report Date: 7/5/201 9 Page 20 of35
analyses applicable to the CWA. SOWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infom1ation is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business [nfonnation: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use of tt
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process_ or in connection wlth the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be b>Tanted only on contact This
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1906343
Project: Seeps and Springs 2019
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: MB-63253 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.7-DIS Date Prepared:
Calcium < 1.00
Magnesium < 1.00
Potassium < 1.00
Sodium < 1.00
Vanadium < 0.00500
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone]. Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Tanner Holliday
Dept: ME
QC Type: MBLK
Reporting Amount Spike Ref.
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC
06/28/2019 1501h
06/14/2019 1410h
mg/L E200.7 0.0937 1.00
mg/L E200.7 0.0439 1.00
mg/L E200.7 0.134 1.00
mg/L E200.7 0.187 1.00
mg/L E200 7 0.00138 0.00500 -Lab Sample ID: MB-63254 Date Analyzed: 06/17/2019 1336h
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared: 06/14/2019 1410h
Arsenic < 0.000200 mg/L E200.8 0.0000298 0.000200
Beryllium < 0.000200 mg/L E200.8 0.0000198 0.000200
Cadmium < 0.0000500 mg/L E200.8 0.00000858 0.0000500
Chromium < 0.000200 mg/L E200.8 0.000191 0.000200
Cobalt < 0.000400 mg/L E200.8 0.0000300 0.000400
Copper < 0.000200 mg/L E200.8 0.000282 0.000200
Iron < 0.0100 mg/L E200.8 0.00496 0.0100
Lead < 0.000200 mg/L E200.8 0.0000448 0.000200
Manganese < 0.000200 mg/L E200.8 0.000108 0.000200
Molybdenum < 0.000200 mg/L E200.8 0.0000652 0.000200
Nickel < 0.000200 mg/L E200 8 0.000148 0.000200
Selenium < 0.000200 mg/L E200.8 0.0000574 0.000200
Silver < 0.000200 mg/L E200.8 0.0000232 0.000200
Thallium < 0.000200 mg/L E200.8 0.0000154 0.000200
Tin < 0.000400 mg/L E200.8 0.000116 0.000400
Uranium < 0.000200 mg/L E200.8 0.0000176 0.000200
Lab Sample ID: MB-63254 Date Analyzed: 06/17/2019 1921h
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared: 06/14/2019 1410h
Zinc < 0.000600 mg/L E200 8 0.000418 0.000600
Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD Ref. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 7/5/2019 Page 21 of35
analyses applicable to the CWA. SOWA, and RCRA are perfom,ed in accordance to NE LAC protocols Pertinent sampling infom1ation is located on the attached COC Confidential Business [nformation: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of ti-
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1906343
Project: Seeps and Springs 2019
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: MB-63387 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: HG-DW-DIS-245.1 Date Prepared:
Mercury < 0.0000900
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked
06/24/2019 744h
06/21/2019 1450h
mg/L E245.l 0.0000396 0.0000900
Tanner Holliday
ME
MBLK
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD Ref. RPD
Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Report Date: 7/5/2019 Page 22 of35
analyses applicable to the CWA, SOWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business rnformation: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use oft~
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone]. Fax: [phone] Laboratory Director
e-mail: awal@ awal-labs.com, web: www.awal-labs.com
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
American West _QC SUMMARY REPORT ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Lab Set ID: 1906343 Dept: ME
Project: Seeps and Springs 2019 QC Type: MS
Reporting Amount Spike Ref. RPD Ref. RPD
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC Limits Amt 0/o RPD Limit Qual
Lab Sample ID: 1906343-00ZEMS Date Analyzed: 06/28/2019 1514h
Test Code: 200.7-DIS Date Prepared: 06/14/2019 1410h
Calcium 161 mg/L E200.7 0.937 10.0 10.00 165 -31.5 70 • 130
Magnesium 43.8 mg/L E200 7 0.439 10.0 10.00 45.6 -17.7 70 • 130
Sodium 127 mg/L E200.7 1.87 10.0 10.00 128 -5.56 70 • 130
Lab Sample ID: 1906343-00ZEMS Date Analyzed: 06/28/2019 1710h
Test Code: 200.7-DIS Date Prepared: 06/14/2019 1410h
Potassium 14.1 mg/L E200.7 0.134 1.00 10.00 3.31 108 70 • 130
Vanadium 0.217 mg/L E200.7 0.00138 0.00500 0.2000 0 108 70 • 130
Lab Sample ID: 1906343-00ZEMS Date Analyzed: 06/17/20191354h
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared: 06/14/2019 1410h
Arsenic 0.208 mg/L E200.8 0.000298 0.00200 0.2000 0.000569 104 75 • 125
Beryllium 0.203 mg/L E200.8 0.000198 0.00200 0.2000 0 101 75 • 125
Cadmium 0.200 mg/L E200,8 0.0000858 0.000500 0.2000 0 99.9 75 • 125
Chromium 0.206 mg/L E200.8 0.00191 0.00200 0.2000 0 103 75 • 125
Cobalt 0.201 mg/L E200,8 0.000300 0.00400 0.2000 0 101 75 • 125
Copper 0.204 mg/L E200.8 0.00282 0.00200 0.2000 0 102 75 • 125
Iron 1.02 mg/L E200.8 0.0496 0.100 1.000 0 102 75 • 125
Lead 0.193 mg/L E200.8 0.000448 0.00200 0.2000 0 96.3 75 • 125
Manganese 0.209 mg/L E200.8 0.00108 0.00200 0.2000 0 105 75 -125
Molybdenum 0.231 mg/L E200.8 0.000652 0.00200 0.2000 0.0202 105 75 • 125
Nickel 0.202 mg/L E200.8 0.00148 0.00200 0.2000 0 101 75 • 125
Selenium 0.227 mg/L E200.8 0.000574 0.00200 0.2000 0.0108 108 75 • 125
Silver 0.190 mg/L E200 8 0.000232 0.00200 0.2000 0.00114 94.2 75 • 125
Thallium 0.192 mg/L E200.8 0.000154 0.00200 0.2000 0 96.0 75 • 125
Tin 1.05 mg/L E200.8 0.00116 0.00400 1.000 0 105 75 • 125
Uranium 0.216 mg/L E200 8 0.000176 0.00200 0.2000 0.00904 104 75 -125
Report Date: 7/5/2019 Page 23 of 35
analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are performed ln accordance to NE LAC protocols Pertinent sampling infom1ation is located on the attached COC Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use of tt-
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with there-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1906343
Project: Seeps and Springs 2019
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: 1906343-002EMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared:
Zinc 1.02
Lab Sample ID: I906343-002EMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: HG-DW-DIS-245.1 Date Prepared:
Mercury 0.00327
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone]. Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked
06/17/20191933h
06/14/2019 1410h
mg/L E200.8 0.00418 0.00600 1.000
06/24/2019 7 54h
06/21/2019 1450h
mg/L E245.l 0.0000396 0.0000900 0.003330
Tanner Holliday
ME
MS
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
0.0068 101
0 98.2
2 -Analyte concentration is too high for accurate matrix spike recovery and/or RPD.
Limits
75 -125
85 -115
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD Ref. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit Qua!
Report Date: 7/5/2019 Page 24 of35
analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NE LAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use of ti-
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone]. Fax: [phone] Laboratory Director
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES _QC SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Lab Set ID: 1906343 Dept: ME
Project: Seeps and Springs 2019 QC Type: MSD
----
Reporting Amount Spike Ref. RPD Ref. RPD
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC Limits Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Lab Sample ID: 1906343-002EMSD Date Analyzed: 06/28/2019 1516h
Test Code: 200.7-DIS Date Prepared: 06/14/2019 1410h
Calcium 164 mg/L E200.7 0.937 10.0 10.00 165 -8.21 70 -130 161 1.43 20 2
Magnesium 46.4 mg/L E200.7 0.439 10.0 10.00 45.6 8.40 70 -130 43.8 5.79 20
Sodium 128 mg/L E200.7 1.87 10.0 10.00 128 0.626 70 • 130 127 0.485 20
Lab Sample ID: 1906343-002EMSD Date Analyzed: 06/28/2019 1708h
Test Code: 200.7-DIS Date Prepared: 06/14/2019 1410h
Potassium 14.3 mg/L E200.7 0.134 1.00 10.00 3.31 110 70 • 130 14.1 1.09 20
Vanadium 0.214 mg/L E200,7 0.00138 0.00500 0.2000 0 107 70 • 130 0.217 1.54 20
Lab Sample ID: 1906343-002EMSD Date Analyzed: 06/17/2019 1358h
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared: 06/14/2019 1410h
Arsenic 0.206 mg/L E200.8 0.000298 0.00200 0.2000 0.000569 103 75 • 125 0.208 1.21 20
Beryllium 0.201 mg/L E200.8 0.000198 0.00200 0.2000 0 100 75 -125 0.203 0.927 20
Cadmium 0.196 mg/L E200.8 0.0000858 0.000500 0.2000 0 98.1 75 • I 25 0.2 1.80 20
Chromium 0.208 mg/L E200.8 0.00191 0.00200 0.2000 0 104 75 • 125 0.206 1.17 20
Cobalt 0.201 mg/L E200.8 0.000300 0.00400 0.2000 0 101 75 -125 0.201 0.118 20
Copper 0.203 mg/L E200.8 0.00282 0.00200 0.2000 0 102 75 • 125 0.204 0.150 20
Iron 1.02 mg/L E200.8 0.0496 0.100 1.000 0 102 75 • 125 1.02 0.367 20
Lead 0.190 mg/L E200.8 0.000448 0.00200 0.2000 0 95.1 75 -125 0.193 1.27 20
Manganese 0.209 mg/L E200.8 0.00108 0.00200 0.2000 0 104 75 -125 0.209 0.313 20
Molybdenum 0.228 mg/L E200.8 0.000652 0.00200 0.2000 0.0202 104 75 -125 0.231 1.15 20
Nickel 0.204 mg/L E200,8 0.00148 0.00200 0.2000 0 102 75 • 125 0.202 0.659 20
Selenium 0,224 mg/L E200.8 0.000574 0.00200 0.2000 0.0108 106 75 -125 0.227 1.38 20
Silver 0.189 mg/L E200 8 0.000232 0.00200 0.2000 0.00114 94.1 75 -125 0.19 0.157 20
Thallium 0.191 mg/L E200.8 0.000154 0.00200 0.2000 0 95.4 75 -125 0.192 0.603 20
Tin 1.04 mg/L E200.8 0.00116 0.00400 1.000 0 104 75 • 125 1.05 1.31 20
Uranium 0.215 mg/L E200.8 0.000176 0.00200 0.2000 0.00904 103 75 -125 0.216 0.417 20
Report Date: 7/5/2019 Page 25 of 35
analyses applicable to the CWA. SOWA, and RCRA are perfom,ed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling mfonnation is located on the attached COC Confidential Business Information This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use of tt-
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report In connection with the advertisement promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1906343
Project: Seeps and Springs 2019
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: l 906343-002 EMSD Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared:
Zinc 1.02
Lab Sample ID: 1906343-002EMSD Date Analyzed:
Test Code: HG-DW-DIS-245.1 Date Prepared:
Mercury 0.00324
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84 I I 9
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone]. Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked
06/17/2019 1936h
06/14/2019 1410h
mg/L E200.8 0.00418 0.00600 1.000
06/24/2019 756h
06/21/2019 1450h
mg/L E245.l 0.0000396 0.0000900 0.003330
Tanner Holliday
ME
MSD
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
0.0068 102
0 97.1
2 -Analyte concentration is too high for accurate matrix spike recovery and/or RPD.
Limits
75 -125
85 -115
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt %RPO Limit
1.02 0.744 20
0.00327 1.08 20
Qual
Report Date: 7/5/2019 Page 26 of35
analyses applicable to the CWA. SOWA, and RCRA are perfom1ed in accordance to NE LAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use oft~
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-pub] ication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
ANALYTICAL
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1906343
Project: Seeps and Springs 2019
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: 1906343-00ICDUP Date Analyzed:
Test Code: TDS-W-2540C
Total Dissolved Solids 1,010
Units
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
_QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount
Method MDL Limit Spiked
Tanner Holliday
WC
DUP
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
06/14/2019 1100h
mg/L SM2540C 16.0 20.0
@ -High RPD due to suspected sample non-homogeneity or matrix interference.
Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPO Ref. RPO
Amt %RPO Limit
892 12.2 5
Qual
@
Report Date: 7/5/2019 Page 27 of35
analyses applicable to the CWA. SOWA, and RCRA are perfom1ed in accordance to NE LAC protocols Pertinent sampling infom1ation is located on the attached COC Confidential Business lnfonnat1on: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use of tl"
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any producl or process. or in connection with there-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1906343
Project: Seeps and Springs 2019
Analyte
Lab Sample ID: LCS-RI27501
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride
Fluoride
Sulfate
Lab Sample ID: LCS-Rl27013
Test Code: ALK-W-23208-LL
Alkalinity (as CaC03)
Lab Sample ID: LCS-63399
Test Code: NH3-W-350. l
Ammonia (as N)
Lab Sample ID: LCS-Rl26960
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N)
Lab Sample ID: LCS-Rl27047
Test Code: TDS-W-2540C
Total Dissolved Solids
Result
Date Analyzed:
4.94
4.96
5.31
Date Analyzed:
250
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
IO.I
Date Analyzed:
1.07
Date Analyzed:
182
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone]. Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked
06/27/2019 1959h
mg/L E300 0 0.0386 0.100 5.000
mg/L E300.0 0.0240 0.100 5.000
mg/L E300.0 0.174 0.750 5.000
06/17/2019 739h
mg/L SM2320B 0.781 1.00 250.0
06/24/2019 l !Olh
06/23/2019 2000h
mg/L E350.l 0.0492 0.0500 10.00
06/14/2019 1028h
mg/L E353,2 0.00363 0.0100 1.000
06/14/2019 1100h
mg/L SM2540C 8.00 10.0 205.0
Tanner Holliday
WC
LCS
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
0 98.8
0 99.1
0 106
0 99.8
0 101
0 107
0 88.8
Limits
90 -110
90 -110
90 -110
90 -110
90 -110
90-110
80 -120
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD Ref. RPD
Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Report Date: 7/5/2019 Page 28 of35
analyses applicable to the CWA, SOWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infomiation is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business lnformation: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of ti-
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re~publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1906343
Project: Seeps and Springs 2019
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: MB-Rl27501 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride < 0.100
Fluoride < 0.100
Sulfate < 0.750
Lab Sample ID: MB-Rl27013 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: ALK-W-23208-LL
Bicarbonate (as CaC03) < 1.00
Carbonate (as CaC03) < 1.00
Lab Sample ID: MB-63399 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: NH3-W-350. l Date Prepared:
Ammonia (as N) < 0.0500
Lab Sample ID: MB-R126960 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) < 0.0100
Lab Sample ID: MB-Rl27047 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: TDS-W-2540C
Total Dissolved Solids < 10.0
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked
06/27/2019 1942h
mg/L E300.0 0.0386 0.100
mg/L E300.0 0.0240 0.100
mg/L E300.0 0.174 0.750
06/17/2019 739h
mg/L SM2320B 0.781 1.00
mg/L SM2320B 0.781 1.00
06/24/2019 1100h
06/23/2019 2000h
mg/L E350 l 0.0492 0.0500
06/14/2019 1027h
mg/L E353 2 0.00363 0.0100
06/14/2019 1100h
mg/L SM2540C 8.00 10.0
Tanner Holliday
WC
MBLK
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD Ref. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 7/5/2019 Page 29 of 35
analyses applicable to the CWA. SOWA, and RCRA are perfom1ed in accordance to N ELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infom,ation is located on the attached COC' Confidential Business Information: This repon is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use of ti-
ne of thls company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1906343
Project: Seeps and Springs 2019
Analyte Result Units
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone]. Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Method MDL
Reporting
Limit
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Amount
Spiked
Tanner Holliday
WC
MS
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
Lab Sample ID: 1906343-00IBMS Date Analyzed: 06/27/2019 2033h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride
Fluoride
Sulfate
Lab Sample ID: 1906343-00IBMS
Test Code: ALK-W-2320B-LL
Alkalinity (as CaC03)
Lab Sample ID: 1906343-00lDMS
Test Code: NH3-W-350.l
Ammonia (as N)
Lab Sample ID: 1906343-00lDMS
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N)
209
98.6
262
Date Analyzed:
1,480
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
12.1
Date Analyzed:
1.02
mg/L E300.0 0.772
mg/L E300.0 0.480
mg/L E300.0 3.48
06/17/2019 739h
mg/L SM2320B 0.781
06/24/2019 1120h
06/23/2019 2000h
mg/L E350 I 0.0492
06/14/2019 1120h
mg/L E353.2 0.00363
1 -Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
2.00
2.00
15.0
1.00
0.0500
0.0100
100.0
100.0
100.0
1,000
10.00
1.000
104
0.912
160
480
0.168
0.0125
105
97.7
102
99.6
120
101
Limits
90 -110
90 -110
90 -110
80 -120
90 -110
90 -110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 7/5/2019 Page 30 of 35
analyses applicable to the CWA. SOWA, and RCR.A are performed in accordance to NE LAC protocols Pertinent sampling infom,ation is located on the attached COC Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use of tl-
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 841 I 9 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone]. Fax: [phone] Laboratory Director
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
_QC SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Tanner Holliday
Lab Set ID: 1906343 Dept: WC
Project: Seeps and Springs 2019 QC Type: MSD
-----
Reporting Amount Spike Ref. RPD Ref. RPD
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC Limits Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Lab Sample ID: l 906343-00 lBMSD Date Analyzed: 06/27/2019 2049h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 207 mg/L E300.0 0.772 2.00 100.0 104 103 90 -110 209 0.907 20
Fluoride 97.3 mg/L E300.0 0.480 2.00 100.0 0.912 96.4 90 -110 98.6 1.29 20
Sulfate 269 mg/L E300 0 3.48 15.0 100.0 160 109 90 -110 262 2.79 20
Lab Sample ID: 1906343-00lBMSD Date Analyzed: 06/17/2019 739h
Test Code: ALK-W-2320B-LL
Alkalinity (as CaC03) 1,480 mg/L SM2320B 0.781 1.00 1,000 480 100 80 -120 1480 0.406 IO
Lab Sample ID: l 906343-00 l DMSD Date Analyzed: 06/24/2019 1126h
Test Code: NH3-W-350. I Date Prepared: 06/23/2019 2000h
Ammonia (as N) 12.7 mg/L E350 l 0.0492 0.0500 10.00 0.168 125 90 -110 12.1 4.67 IO
Lab Sample ID: 1906343-00lDMSD Date Analyzed: 06/14/2019 1121h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.06 mg/L E353.2 0.00363 0.0100 1.000 0.0125 104 90-110 1.02 3.28 10
' -Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
Report Date: 7/5/2019 Page 31 of 3 5
analyses applicable to the CWA. SOWA, and RCRA are perforn1ed in accordance to NE LAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the e:'Cclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use oft~
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1906343
Project: Seeps and Springs 2019
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: LCS VOC-3 061319A Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 8260-W-DENIOO
Benzene 20.5
Chloroform 19.3
Methylene chloride 20.1
Naphthalene 18.2
Tetrahydrofuran 15.6
Toluene 20.2
Xylenes, Total 63.0
Surr: l ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 52.0
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 51.3
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 48.0
Surr: Toluene-dB 49.1
Units
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount
Method MDL Limit Spiked
Tanner Holliday
MSVOA
LCS
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
06/13/2019 742h
µg/L SW8260C 0.147 1.00 20.00 0 103
µg/L SW8260C 0.166 1.00 20.00 0 96.6
µg/L SW8260C 0.448 1.00 20.00 0 IOI
µg/L SW8260C 0.704 LOO 20.00 0 91.2
µg/L SW8260C 0.436 LOO 20.00 0 77.9
µg/L SW8260C 0.177 1.00 20.00 0 IOI
µg/L SW8260C 0.253 1.00 60.00 0 105
µg/L SW8260C 50.00 104
µg/L SW8260C 50.00 103
µg/L SW8260C 50.00 95.9
µg/L SW8260C 50.00 98.3
Limits
82 -132
85 -124
65 -154
63 -129
59 -125
69 -129
66 -124
80 -136
85 -121
78 -132
81 -123
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPO Ref. RPO
Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Report Date: 7/5/2019 Page 32 of35
analyses applicable to the CWA. SOWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NE LAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC' Confidential Business Information: This report ls provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privlleges of subsequent use oft~
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1906343
Project: Seeps and Springs 2019
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: MB VOC-3 061319A Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 8260-W-DENIOO
2-Butanone <20.0
Acetone <20.0
Benzene < 1.00
Carbon tetrachloride < 1.00
Chloroform < 1.00
Chloromethane < 1.00
Methylene chloride < 1.00
Naphthalene < 1.00
Tetrahydrofuran < 1.00
Toluene < 1.00
Xylenes, Total < 1.00
Surr: l ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 49.0
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 53.9
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 44.1
Surr: Toluene-d8 50.5
Units
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount
Method MDL Limit Spiked
Tanner Holliday
MSVOA
MBLK
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
06/13/2019 802h
µg/L SW8260C 1.31 20.0
µg/L SW8260C 2.87 20.0
µg/L SW8260C 0.147 1.00
µg/L SW8260C 0.262 1.00
µg/L SW8260C 0.166 1.00
µg/L SW8260C 0.832 1.00
µg/L SW8260C 0.448 1.00
µg/L SW8260C 0.704 1.00
µg/L SW8260C 0.436 1.00
µg/L SW8260C 0.177 1.00
µg/L SW8260C 0.253 1.00
µg/L SW8260C 50.00 98.1
µg/L SW8260C 50.00 108
µg/L SW8260C 50.00 88.2
µg/L SW8260C 50.00 IOI
Limits
80 -136
85 -121
78 -132
81 -123
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPO
Amt %RPO Limit Qual
Report Date: 7/5/2019 Page 33 of35
analyses applicable to the CWA, SOWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NE LAC protocols Pertinent sampling infom,ation is located on the attached COC Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use of tl-
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact_ This
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1906343
Project: Seeps and Springs 2019
Analyte
Lab Sample ID: 1906343-00IAMS
Test Code: 8260-W-DENIOO
Benzene
Chloroform
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
Result
Date Analyzed:
19.4
18.2
18.9
17.6
12.1
22.0
56.3
53.5
51.2
48.5
44.1
Units
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
_QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount
Method MDL Limit Spiked
Tanner Holliday
MSVOA
MS
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
06/13/2019 1540h
µg/L SW8260C 0.147 1.00 20.00 0 97.0
µg/L SW8260C 0.166 1.00 20.00 0 90.9
µg/L SW8260C 0.448 1.00 20.00 0 94.4
µg/L SW8260C 0.704 1.00 20.00 0 88.2
µg/L SW8260C 0436 1.00 20.00 0 60.4
µg/L SW8260C 0.177 1.00 20.00 5.59 82.0
µg/L SW8260C 0.253 1.00 60.00 0 93.9
µg/L SW8260C 50.00 107
µg/L SW8260C 50.00 102
µg/L SW8260C 50.00 97.0
µg/L SW8260C 50.00 88.2
Limits
66 -145
so -146
30 -192
41 -131
43 -146
18 -192
42 -167
72 -151
80 -152
72 -135
80 -124
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD Ref. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 7/5/2019 Page 34 of35
analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NE LAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This repon is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use of tt-
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1906343
Project: Seeps and Springs 2019
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: 1906343-00 lAMSD Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 8260-W-DENlOO
Benzene 21.7
Chloroform 19.5
Methylene chloride 18.5
Naphthalene 18.5
Tetrahydrofuran 14.5
Toluene 24.5
Xylenes, Total 58.6
Surr: l ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 55.2
Surr: 4-Bromotluorobenzene 50.8
Surr: Dibromotluoromethane 52.3
Surr: Toluene-d8 48.4
Units
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone]. Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
_Q!:_SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount
Method MDL Limit Spiked
Tanner Holliday
MSVOA
MSD
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
06/13/2019 1600h
µg/L SW8260C 0.147 1.00 20.00 0 108
µg/L SW8260C 0.166 1.00 20.00 0 97.5
µg/L SW8260C 0.448 1.00 20.00 0 92.3
µg/L SW8260C 0.704 1.00 20.00 0 92.4
µg/L SW8260C 0.436 1.00 20.00 0 72.4
µg/L SW8260C 0.177 1.00 20.00 5.59 94.8
µg/L SW8260C 0.253 1.00 60.00 0 97.7
µg/L SW8260C 50.00 110
µg/L SW8260C 50.00 102
µg/L SW8260C 50.00 105
µg/L SW8260C 50.00 96.8
Limits
66 -145
50 -146
30 -192
41 -131
43 -146
18 -192
42 -167
72 -151
80 -152
72 -135
80 -124
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD Ref. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit
19.4 11.1 25
18.2 7.06 25
18.9 2.30 25
17.6 4.71 25
12.1 18.0 25
22 10.9 25
56.3 4.04 25
Qual
Report Date: 7/5/2019 Page 35 of35
analyses applicable to the CWA. SOWA, and RCRA are perfom1ed in accordance to NE LAC protocols Pertinent sampling infom1ation is located on the attached COC Confidential Business fnfom,ation: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use of tt-
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
American West Analytical Laboratories Rpt Emailed: UL
Denison
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1906343
Due Date: 6/27/2019
Page 1 of3
Client:
Client ID:
Project:
Comments:
Sample ID
1906343-00IA
1906343-00IB
1906343-00lC
1906343-00ID
1906343-00IE
1906343-002A
1906343-002B
1906343-002C
Printed: 06/14/19 17:12
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
ENE300
Seeps and Springs 2019
Contact: Tanner Holliday
QC Level: III WO Type: Project
QC 3 (no chromatograms). EDD-Denison. CC [e-mail]; (USE PROJECT for special DLs). Do not use "*R_" samples as MS/MSD.;
Client Sample ID
Entrance Seep
Ruin Spring
Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
6/11/2019 0815h 6/13/2019 1054h 8260-W-DENlOO Aqueous VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-DENlOO; #of Analytes: 11 /# of Su": 4
300.0-W df-wc
3 SEL Analytes: CL F S04
ALK-W-2320B-LL df-wc
2 SEL Analytes: ALKB ALKC
TDS-W-2540C df-tds
1 SEL Anal)'tes: TDS
NH3-W-350.l df -no2/no3 & nh3
I SEL Analytes: NH3N
NH3-W-PR df -no2/no3 & nh3
N02/N03-W-353.2 df -no2/no3 & nh3
1 SELAnal)'tes: N03N02N
200.7-DIS df-met
5 SEL Analytes: CA MG K NA V
200.7-DIS-PR df-met
200.8-DIS df-met
17 SELAnalytes: AS BE CD CR CO CU FE PB MN MO NI SE AG
TLSNUZN
200.8-DIS-PR df-met
HG-DW-DIS-245.1 df-met
1 SEL Analytes: HG
HG-DW-DIS-PR df-met
IONBALANCE df-met
5 SEL Analytes: BALANCE Anions Cations TDS-Balance TDS-Calc
6/11/2019 0850h 6/13/2019 1054h 8260-W-DENIOO Aqueous VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-DENIOO; # of Analytes: JI I# of Surr: 4
300.0-W df-wc
3 SEL AnalJ,_tes: CL F S04
ALK-W-2320B-LL df-wc
2 SEL Analytes: ALKB ALKC
TDS-W-2540C df-tds
I SEL Analytes: TDS
wQ7
3
3
LABORATORY CHECK: %M D RT D CN D TAT D QC D LUO D HOK ___ HOK __ _ HOK___ COC Emailed. ____ _
WORK ORDER Summary
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Sample ID Client Sample ID
1906343-002D Ruin Spring
l906343-002E
1906343-003A Cottonwood Spring
1906343-003B
1906343-003C
1906343-003D
1906343-003E
WorkOrder: 1906343
Due Date: 6/27/2019
Page2of3
Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Set Storage
6/11/2019 0850h 6/13/2019 1054h NHJ-W-350.1 Aqueous
6/11/2019 0950h
I SEL Analytes: NH3N
NH3-W-PR
N02/N03-W-353.2
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
200.7-DIS
5 SEL Ana/ytes: CA MG K NA V
200.7-DIS-PR
200.8-DIS
17 SEL Ana/ytes: AS BE CD CR CO CU FE PB MN MO NI SE AG
TLSNUZN
200.8-DIS-PR
HG-DW-DIS-245.1
I SEL Analytes: HG
HG-DW-DIS-PR
IONBALANCE
5 SEL Analytes: BALANCE Anions Cations TDS-Balance TDS-Calc
6/13/2019 1054h 8260-W-DENlOO Aqueous
Test Gruup: 8260-W-DENIOO; # of A_!lalytes: II/# ofSurr: 4
300.0-W
3 SEL Analytes: CL F S04
ALK-W-2320B-LL
2 SEL Analytes: ALKB ALKC
TDS-W-2540C
1 SEL Analytes: TDS
NH3-W-350.l
l SEL Analytes: NH3N
NB3-W-PR
N02/N03-W-353.2
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
200.7-DIS
5 SEL Analytes: CA MG K NA V
200.7-DIS-PR
200.8-DIS
17 SEL Analytes: AS BE CD CR CO CU FE PB MN MO NI SE AG
TLSNUZN
200.8-DIS-PR
HG-DW-DIS-245.1
1 SEL Analy_tes: HG
df -no2/no3 & nb3
df -no2/no3 & nb3
df -no2/no3 & nb3
df-met
df-met
df-met
df-met
df-met
df-met
df-met
VOCFridge
df-wc
df-wc
df-tds
df -no2/no3 & nh3
df -no2/no3 & nb3
df -no2/no3 & nh3
df-met
df-met
elf-met
df-met
df-met
Printed: 06/14/19 17:12 LABORATORY CHECK: %M O RT O CN O TAT O QC O LUO 0 HOK ___ HOK __ _ HOK___ COC Emailed,__ ___ _
3
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1906343 Page 3 of3
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 6/27/2019
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1906343-00JE Cottonwood Spring 6/11/2019 0950h 6/13/2019 1054h HG-DW-DIS-PR Aqueous df-met
IONBALANCE df-met
5 SEL Ana[ytes: BALANCE Anions Cations TDS-Balance TDS-Calc
1906343-004A Back Spring 6/11/2019 0850h 6/13/2019 1054h 8260-W-DENlOO Aqueous VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-DENIOO; # of Analytes: 11 /#ofSurr: 4
1906343-004B 300.0-W df-wc
3 SEL Analytes: CL F S04
ALK-W-2320B-LL df-wc
2 SEL Analytes: ALKB ALKC
1906343-004C TDS-W-2540C df-tds
I SEL Analytes: TDS
1906343-004D NHJ-W-350.1 df -no2/no3 & nh3
1 SEL Analytes: NH3N
NHJ-W-PR df -no2/no3 & nh3
N02/N03-W-353.2 df -no2/no3 & nh3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1906343-004E 200.7-DIS df-met
5 SEL Analytes: CA MG K NA V
200.7-DIS-PR df-met
200.8-DIS df-met
17 SELAnalytes: AS BE CD CR CO CU FE PB MN MO NI SE AG
TLSNUZN
200.8-DIS-PR df-met
HG-DW-DIS-245.1 df-met
1 SEL Analytes: HG
HG-DW-DIS-PR df-met
IONBALANCE df-met
5 SEL Analytes: BALANCE Anions Cations TDS-Balance TDS-Calc
1906343-00SA Trip Blank 6/11/2019 0815h 6/13/2019 1054h 8260-W-DENlOO Aqueous VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-DENJOO; # of A~)l_tes: 11 I # of Su": 4
Printed: 06/14/19 17:12 LABORATORY CHECK: %M D RT D CN O TAT O QC D LUO D HOK ___ HOK~--HOK___ COC Emailed. ____ _
2
3
4
5
6
7
I
I
)
I
!
American West
Analytical Laboratories
463 W. 3600 S. Salt lake City, UT 84115
Phone# [phone] Toll Free# [phone]
~ Fax# [phone] Email awal@awal~abs.com
www.awal-labs.com
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Address: 6425 S. Hwy. 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Contact: Tanner Holliday
Phone#: [phone] Cell#:
gpalmc:r@e:ae:rgyftlels.com; [e-mail];
Email: thoDida~DCJ,a,fucls.com
Project Name: Seeps and Springs 2019
Project#:
PO#:
Sampler Name: Tanner Holliday
Date
Samole ID: Samoled
Entrance Seep 6/11/2019
Ruin Spring 6/11/2019
Cottonwood Spring 6/11/2019
Back Spring 6/11/2019
Trip Blank 6/11/2019
RollnQUSl>8d by: . --\ J:j_/ ~ _,,,.,-Date:
1""1oati.re • . hA >fb,_,. 6112/20ll ..____, ~ ,&,' rnme:
PrinlName: T-~m~. 1130
Relinqashod by: UBII}:
""'=tl.Jm
11rne:
Print Name:
Rellnqulsl)<!dby: '1a!e:
IS1ona11.<e -il°"lffle:
Print Name:
Relinq<ilsllCdby.
-----
i,-ate;
1--
/ 111me:
Prtnj Namo: -' ..
I
Time
Samoled
815
850
950
850
815
Received by:
Slanature
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
All analysis will be conducted using NELAP accredited methods and all data will be reported using AWAL's standard analyte lists and
reporting llmlts (POL) unless specifically recuested otherwise on this Chain or Custody and/or attached documentation.
QC Level: I Tum Around Time: Unless other arrangements have been made,
signed repoos wlll be emailed by 5:00 pm on
3 Standard the day l,ey are due.
X Include EDD: 0 LOCUS UPLOAD ::el «l C) EXCEL tiii tiii X Reid Fitered For: --:i:: ::el Dissolved Metals ...... i:: Vi :;E :.f '<!" t'l ~ oi ~ z For Compliance With:
c::i & ~ D NELAP c:, D RCRA o' t'l
c::i ;:::-;5 >-D CWA
c:, ci C) ;:::i D SOWA --O') 0 D ELAP/A2LA ...... ~ c:, g .. Q C) cf 0 r:n D NLLAP ~ c:, ~ .!l k O') c:, C) e:i D Non-Compliance f;j .. ls) Q • D Other: ... 0 ~ 0 -0 t CT' I" l"2. c., CT' = :II C) CII c:, ., f c:, .... c:, u IC C C'> c:, 0 ;J; u 'U ,.; ,.; = t'l ... .. 0 ls) Ill CQ "E ::. fl.I iii .e: r:n .; ~ Known Hazards 0 Ii!: ~ a a ...... ri :i Q) ...... 0 IQ .. u C. cq l'l f1J ~ .. < u & 0 E 0 = ~ ~ .. Q g "' Ii!: Ii!: u i5 0 Samole Comments .. en ..
7 w X x-·x X X X X X X X
7 w X X X X X X X X X X
7 w X X X X X X X X X X
7 w X X X X X X X X X X
3 w X
Cate: Special Instructions: -~
Time:
\30Co3t!3
AWAL 1..!b Sample Set#
Page 1 of 1
1°
00 ""'(a 1-i:i I\,
Laboratory Use Only
SamplesWere: l,l.f5 ~ ·~-, .. \•'
2 Amb!lihl Ctilled
3 Temperature D • ~·c
4 Received Brn~ (lmprnperfy
y N
c:i:Preserved N
at bench
y N
6 Received Within
Qjnmes N
lroc Tape Was:
G"ent on outer Package
N NA
~broken on Outer Package
N NA
3 PresentonSample G
Y N NA
4 UnbrokenonSample ~) Y N NA
Discrepancies Between Sample
y N Labels and CCC R~
-----Print Name: Sample containers for metals were field filtered. See the Recetvecl by. Date:
Signau.,, ~ Analytical Scope of Work for Reporting Limits and voe analyte
Prim Nam~...,...........
nrne: list.
cedby: Date:
~nature
rnme:
Print Name: .-. ,, . '
Received by:K:.b, A ti~';» ) Slanature 1 .Al\ 1 I 1 _A Dat~h~ ,C(
Print Name, [:::}..e> .,.-,u':-.-~ 'BrtA.u..A\ t'1 111me: \O~_d
I
Analysis
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
N02&
N03
O&G
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TP04
Procedure:
Frequency:
Preservation Check Sheet
s le Set Ext,
Preservative -001 -OffL -oo~ ... oolf
oH<2H2S04 11\JO IA//.1 (A,//.} 1/1,(/)
oH<2H2S04 0 q , V
pH>12NaOH
oH<2HN03 vUO l/\,W (M,(} vxa
q ~ V V
pH<2H2S04 ~ ~ vf,O
pH<2HCL
0H<2H2S04
pH>9NaOH,
Zn Acetate
0H<2H2S04
pH<2H2S04
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
doll
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
If sample is not preserved, properly"list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag COC, notify client if requested
Place client conversation on COC
Samples may be adjusted
All samples requiring preservation
*
+ ...
#
•
The sample required additional preservative upon receipt.
The sample was received unpreserved.
The sample was received unpreserved and therefore preserved upon receipt.
The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH < 2 due to the sample matrix.
Tl,c, c,n...--1.a. -n.U 'IU"'1t'I n,n.-,,-1;,,c,+n1"lo +" n -ll ......,_ Ano +" +ka. ll"'lnm .... lo """"" ...... ;"' ;...,,..,,... ... l'.o..,o .... ,..o
Lab Set ID: I qoto~4~
pH Lot#: t5q Vl .. ------
0 [§'Jij• I Laboratories LLc
a member of The GEL Group INC
PO Box 30712 Cr1art est on. SC 29417
2040 Savage Road Charteston. SC 29407
P 843.556.8171
F 843 766.1178
July 10, 2019
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Re: Analytical for Seeps and Springs 2019
Work Order: 481772
Dear Ms. Weinel:
GEL Laboratories, LLC (GEL) appreciates the opportunity to provide the enclosed analytical results for the
sample(s) we received on June 13, 2019. This original data report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance
with GEL's standard operating procedures.
Test results for NELAP or ISO 17025 accredited tests are verified to meet the requirements of those standards,
with any exceptions noted. The results reported relate only to the items tested and to the sample as received by
the laboratory. These results may not be reproduced except as full reports without approval by the laboratory.
Copies of GEL's accreditations and certifications can be found on our website at www.gel.com.
Our policy is to provide high quality, personalized analytical services to enable you to meet your analytical needs
on time every time. We trust that you will find everything in order and to your satisfaction. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 4289.
Purchase Order: DWI6138
Enclosures
Sincerely,
Julie Robinson
Project Manager
11111m1 HI u~m 11111111111 t 11111
ge l.co rn
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Analytical for
SDG: 481772
July 10, 2019
Laboratory Identification:
GEL Laboratories LLC
2040 Savage Road
Charleston, South Carolina 29407
[phone]
Summary:
Receipt Narrative
for
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
SDG: 481772
Sample receipt: The samples arrived at GEL Laboratories LLC, Charleston, South Carolina on June 13, 2019
for analysis. The samples were delivered with proper chain of custody documentation and signatures. All sample
containers arrived without any visible signs of tampering or breakage. There are no additional comments
concerning sample receipt.
Sample Identification: The laboratory received the following samples:
Case Narrative:
Laboratory ID
481772001
481772002
481772003
481772004
Client ID
Entrance Seep
Ruin Spring
Cottonwood Spring
Back Spring
Sample analyses were conducted using methodology as outlined in GEL's Standard Operating Procedures. Any
technical or administrative problems during analysis, data review, and reduction are contained in the analytical
case narratives in the enclosed data package.
The enclosed data package contains the following sections: Case Narrative, Chain of Custody, Cooler Receipt
Checklist, Data Package Qualifier Definitions and data from the following fractions: Radiochemistry.
Julie Robinson
Project Manager
~~l,1~
I Sheet1 of 1
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Samples Shipped to: Gel Laboratories Contact: Tanner Hollie ay
2040 Sava9e Road Ph: 435 678 115
Charleston, SC 29407 thollidavtmen ernvfue!s.com
Chain of Custody/Sampling Analysis Request
Project Samplers Name Sampl ers Signature
Seeps and SprinQs 2019 Tanner Holliday I ..=·_)11 Ann 11 jj;//~/
/
Time
Sample ID Date Collected Collected Laboratory Analysis Re ~uested
Entrance Seep 6/11/2019 815 Gross Alpha
Ruin Spring 6/11/2019 850 Gross Alpha I
Cottonwood Spring 6/11/2019 950 Gross Alpha
Back Spring 6/11/2019 850 Gross Alpha
I
I
Comments:
Relinquished By:( Signature) Date/Time Received By:(Signature) Date/Time
~ TannJtiJ~-6/12/2019 ~ u2/r3j~q; v ......... ,iJ A ,!On"' -, K-"~ 1130 -Relinquished By:( Signaturef Date/Time Recei~ignature) Date/Time
~. -~~~
.,... ___
g I Laboratories i LC SAMPLE RECEIPT & REVIEW FORM
Client: .Ol~tu \ SDG/AR/COC/Work Order: l..\~1112
Recch•ed Bv: ZKW Date Received: to\,~h~ I
FedEx Express
Circ~c,ble:
FedEx Ground • Field Services Courier Other
Carrier and Tracking Number
t ::;? I 9., -:+ '/'-Ii./ hi q lf1-4Zw~
Suspected lh11.ard Information t 0 *If Nel Counls > I OOcpm on samples not marked "radioaclive", contacl lhe Radial ion S, fc1y Group for further investigation. > 2
Hazard Class Shipped: UNI/:
A)Shippcd as a DOT Hazardous? ....... If UN2910, Is lhc Radioactive Shipment Survey Compliant? Yes_ No_
eT ~ ·,if.fi .'. •1r$:~ , r: . . -, !!~ ,t).~.~.:ft:iJl B) Did the client designalc lhe samples arc to be V" OC notn11on,oll;1'liilib.,c11vo.shcil(!ir ·OI\\C,l!nl, ~lOJ'S ct111n J.i/' 11 ffcsfgnu11 n, '
rccei ved as radioacli ve? .,JI'. ·., ~".:."' ""' , . i;, ~ i,, ~ . 'l ' -
C) Did 1hc RSO classify 1hc smnples as Maximum Ncl Counls Observed• (Observed Counts -Area Background Counls): ~ ~mRJ•lr
radioaclive? ....... Classified as: Rad I Rad 2 Rad 3
~ ··-=-,
-;:.~·. ,\\! ~frfcJ .~ ~~: .1· 1'[ '" 'it,,· D) Did the client designate samples are ~f!re'nQlA . or,hlt7,11(jll(!i . ls J! .,nu cµ-~1\uli)l:h :.j mi lJll~llPI! .,f ~z~ ·~ . . •:ii. ~Ii . hazardous? ...,. j_-• ., a ~ ~i:_,, ~ .... ,,_;:;,·~"-1$!'-_i' ' M.:;
lfD or Eis yes, select Ha,.ards below.
E) Did lhe RSO identify possible hazards? v h'CB's Flammable Foreign Soil RCRA Asbes1os Beryllium 01her:
Sample Rccci11t Criteria ~ < 0 Comment,/Qualilicrs (Required for Non-Conformi g Items) ;;.. z z
Shipping containers received imact and Circle Applicable: Seals broken Damaged conlaincr Leaking co111aincr Other (dcsc ibe)
I scaled?
2 Chain or custody documenls included Circle Applicable: Client contaclcd and provided COC COC created upon receipt
with shipment? --Samples requiring cold preservation Preservation Method: Wet Ice Ice Packs Dry ice ~Other:
I TEMP: "Z-S ('.'._ 3 •all tempcralures arc recorded in Celsius within (0 < 6 deg. C)?*
Daily check performed and passed on JR Temperature Device Serial II; IR3-18
4 temperature gun? Secondary Te111pcra1ure Device Serial II (If Applicable):
Circle Applicoble: Seals broken Damaged conrnincr Lcaki11g c.on1niner Oihcr (dcsc ibc)
5 Sample conlainers intact and scaled?
Samples requiring chemical preservation Sample ID's and Containers Affeclcd: I 6 at proper pH? tr p,.. ..... ,.: .... .1., •• , L.nr#•
Ir Yes, are Encores or Soil Kits presertl for solids? Yes No -NA (lfyes, lqke to VOA Frcc1.cr)
Do any samples require Volatile Do liquid VOA vials contain acid preservation? Yes No NA (lfunknmyn, select No)
7 Analysis? ..... -Krc liquid VOA vials free ol'headspace'! Yes_ No_ NA __
Sample ID's and conlnincrs nffe:ctcd:
!D's and tesls affecled:
I 8 Samples received within holding time?
Sample ID's on COC match ID's on !D's and conlaincrs affeclcd:
I 9 boules?
Date & time on COC match date & lime Circle Applicable: No dates on containers No times on containers COCmissin • info Other (describe)
10 on bottles?
N limber of containers received match Circle Applicable: No con1aincr counl on COC Olher (describe)
II number indicated on COC?
12 Are sample containers identifiable as I lr,i:;_1 . nrnv;.1~.1?
13 COC form is properly signed in Circle Applicable: Nol relinquished Other (describe)
relinquished/received sections?
Commenls (Use Conlinuation Fonn if needed):
PM (or PMA) review: lnilials ---1"'-'-'l'y\---"(_~-Dale~ /14.,1-I ~! q~--"'' ::L_ ,r I GL-CHL-SR-001 Rev 6
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
GEL Work Order/SDG: 481772
Client SDG: 481772
Seeps and Springs 2019
Project Manager:
Project Name:
Purchase Order:
Package Level:
EDD Format:
Julie Robinson
DNMI00106 Analytical for
DW16138
LEVEL3
EIM_DNMI
GELID Client Sample ID Client Sample Desc.
481772001 Entrance Seep
481772002 Ruin Spring
481772003 Cottonwood Spring
481772004 Back Spring
Collect
Date & Time
11-JUN-19 08:15
11-JUN-19 08:50
11-JUN-19 09:50
11-JUN-19 08:50
Work Order Due Date: 11-JUL-19
Package Due Date:
EDD Due Date:
QA Due Date:
IPKe~ate:
Receive Time # of
Date & Time Zone Cont.
13-JUN-19 09:50 -2 1
13-JUN-19 09:50 -2 1
13-JUN-19 09:50 -2 1
13-JUN-19 09:50 -2 1
09-JUL-19
11-JUL-19
11-JUL-19
12-JUL-19
Lab
Matrix
GROUND WATER
GROUND WATER
GROUND WATER
GROUND WATER
Report Date: 10-JUL-19
Work Order:481772
Page 1 of 2
Collector: C
Prelogin #: 20190486669
Project Workdef ID: 1329132
SDG Status: Closed
Logged by:
Fax Days to Prelog Lab Field
Due Date Process CofC# Group QC QC
19
19
19
19
Client Sample ID Status Tests/Methods
Product
Reference Fax Date PM Comments Aux Data
Receive
Codes
-001 Entrance Seep
-002 Ruin Spring
-003 Cottonwood Spring
-004 Back Spring
REVW GFPC, Total Alpha Radium,
Liquid
REVW GFPC, Total Alpha Radium,
Liquid
REVW GFPC, Total Alpha Radium,
Liquid
REVW GFPC, Total Alpha Radium,
Liquid
Product: GFCTORAL Workdef ID: 1461303
Method: EPA 903.0
Product Description: GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid
Samples: 001, 002, 003, 004
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS# Parmname
Gross Radium Alpha
Gross Alpha
Gross Alpha
Gross Alpha
Gross Alpha
In Product Group? No
Action Product Name Description
Contingent
Tests
Group Name:
Client RDL or
PQL & Unit
Samples
Reporting
Units
pCi/L
Group Reference:
Path: Drinking Water (903.0 or 9315)
Product Reference: Gross Alpha
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
REG y y No
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
Login Requirements:
Requirement Include? Comments
Peer Review by: ___________ _ Work Order (SDG#), PO# Checked? ____ _
Report Date: 10-JUL -19
Work Order:481772
Page 2 of 2
C of C signed in receiver location? _____ _
List of current GEL Certifications as of IO July 2019
State Certification
Alaska 17-018
Arkansas 88-0651
CLIA 42D0904046
California 2940
Colorado SCOOOl2
Connecticut PH-0169
DoD ELAP/ ISO 17025 A2LA 2567.01
Florida NELAP E87156
Foreign Soils Permit P330-15-00283,P330-15-00253
Georgia SC00012
Georgia SDWA 967
Hawaii SC00012
Idaho SC00012
Illinois NELAP 200029
Indiana C-SC-01
Kansas NELAP E-10332
Kentucky SDWA 90129
Kentucky Wastewater 90129
Louisiana Drinking Water LA024
Louisiana NELAP 03046 (AI33904)
Maine 2019020
Maryland 270
Massachusetts M-SC012
Michigan 9976
Mississippi SC00012
Nebraska NE-OS-26-13
Nevada scooo 122019-3
New Hampshire NELAP 2054
New Jersey NELAP SC002
New Mexico SCOOOl2
New York NELAP 11501
North Carolina 233
North Carolina SDWA 45709
North Dakota R-158
Oklahoma 9904
Pennsylvania NELAP 68-00485
Puerto Rico SCOOOl2
S. Carolina Radiochem 10120002
South Carolina Chemistry 10120001
Tennessee TN 02934
TexasNELAP Tl04704235-19-15
UtahNELAP SC000122018-27
Vermont VT87156
Virginia NELAP 460202
Washington C780
Radiochemistry
Technical Case Narrative
Energy Fuels Resources
SDG #: 481772
Product: GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid
Analytical Method: EPA 903.0
Analytical Procedure: GL-RAD-A-044 REV# 10
Analytical Batch: 1888588
The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s).
GEL Sample ID#
481772001
481772002
481772003
481772004
1204312433
1204312434
1204312435
1204312436
1204312437
Client Sample rdentification
Entrance Seep
Ruin Spring
Cottonwood Spring
Back Spring
Method Blank (MB)
48 l 772004(Back Spring) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
48 l 772004(Back Spring) Matrix Spike (MS)
481772004(Back Spring) Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.
Data Summary:
All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and
procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where
applicable, with the following exceptions.
Preparation Information
Aliquot Reduced
aliquots were reduced due to limited sample volume.
Technical Information
Recounts
Samples 1204312435 (Back SpringMS), 1204312436 (Back SpringMSD) and 1204312437 (LCS) were
recounted due to low recovery. The recounts are reported. Samples 1204312434 (Back SpringDUP) and
481772004 (Back Spring) were recounted due to high MDCs. The recounts are reported.
Miscellaneous Information
Additional Comments
The matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate, 1204312435 (Back SpringMS) and 1204312436 (Back
SpringMSD), aliquots were reduced to conserve sample volume.
Certification Statement
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Qualifier Definition Report
for
DNMI001 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Client SDG: 481772 GEL Work Order: 481772
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria ** Analyte is a surrogate compound
U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
Review/Validation
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data reviewer. In addition, all CLP-like deliverables
receive a third level review of the fractional data package.
The following data validator verified the information presented in this data report:
Signature: j~ ~
Date: 08 JUL 2019
Name: Theresa Austin
Title: Group Leader
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Workorder: 481772
Parmname NOM Sam le Qual _ C
R.ad Gas Flow
3atch 1888588
QC1204312434 481772004 DUP
Gross Radium Alpha u 0.201 u
Uncertainty +l-0.158
QC1204312437 LCS
Gross Radium Alpha 555
Uncertainty
QC1204312433 MB
Gross Radium Alpha u
Uncertainty
QCJ204312435 481772004 MS
Gross Radium Alpha 4470 u 0.201
Uncertainty +l-0.158
QC1204312436 481772004 MSD
Gross Radium Alpha 4470 u 0.201
Uncertainty +l-0.158
Notes:
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (I-sigma).
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
**
<
>
Analyte is a surrogate compound
Result is less than value reported
Result is greater than value reported
The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product
0.478
+l-0.212
505
+l-5 .IO
0.824
+l-0.357
3690
+l-45.0
3640
+l-40.5
Units
pCilL
pCi/L
pCilL
pCilL
pCilL
RPD%
NIA
1.41
A
B
BD
C
D
F
H
K
L
M
For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank.
Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low
Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis
Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample
Estimated Value
Analytical holding time was exceeded
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actual value is expected to be lower.
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low. Actual value is expected to be higher.
M if above MDC and less than LLD
Reoort Date: July 8, 2019
REC% Rane Anlst
NIA LXB3
91.l (75%-125%)
82.5 (75%-125%)
81.4 (0%-20%)
Page 1 of
Date Time
07102/19 06:1
07101/19 09:4•
06128/19 11 :4·
07101119 09:4
07101/19 09:4
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 481772
Parmname NOM Sam le Units RPD% REC% Ran e Anlst
M Matrix Related Failure
NIA RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.
NI
ND
NJ
Q
R
u
UI
UJ
UL
X
y
I\
h
See case narrative
Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER.
Sample results are rejected
Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification
Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification
Not considered detected. The associated number is the reported concentration, which may be inaccurate due to a low bias.
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
QC Samples were not spiked with this compound
RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +I-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.
Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded
Page 2 of ----Date Time
NI A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike cone. by a factor of 4 or more or %RPO not applicable.
/\ The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater than
five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of +I-the
RL is used to evaluate the DUP result.
* Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.
For PS, PSD, and SDIL T results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.
TabE
Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
Table E-1 Holding Time Evaluation
•· .. -
I: Cottonwood Entrance Back Spring West Water Required Holding Time (duplicate of Ruin Spring I', Spring Seep Ruin Spring) Seep
Carbonate 14 days OK OK OK OK OK
Bicarbonate 14 days OK OK OK OK OK
Calcium 6 months OK OK OK OK OK
Chloride 28 days OK OK OK OK OK
Fluoride 28 days OK OK OK OK OK
Magnesium 6 months OK OK OK OK OK
Nitrogen-Ammonia 28 days OK OK OK OK OK
Nitrogen-Nitrate 28 days OK OK OK OK OK
Potassium 6 months OK OK OK OK OK
Sodium 6 months OK OK OK OK OK
Sulfate 28 days OK OK OK OK OK
pH (s.u.) NIA OK OK OK OK OK
TDS 7 days OK OK OK OK OK
6 months (except
mercury which is 28
Metals days) OK OK OK OK OK
Radiologies 6 months OK OK OK OK OK
voes (including THF) 14 days OK OK OK OK OK
* -Corral Spring, and Corral Canyon were all dry and no samples were collected.
E-2 Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check
W~,, Ji 01tGit:{1 ~,cul!!b ~. t, s~ ID Rece~pt Temp
AWAL-1906343 o.3°c
GEL-481772 NIA
AW AL -1903737 0.3°C
GEL-475027 NIA
NIA= These shipments contained samples for the
analysis of Gross Alpha only. Per Table 1 in the
approved QAP, samples submitted for Gross Alpha
analyses do not have a sample temperature requirement.
E-3: Ana lytical Method Check -Routine Samples
Parameter QAP/Permit: Method Method li,Jsed by Lab
Ammonia ( as N) A4500-NH3 G or E350.1 E350.l
Nitrate+ Nitrite (as N) E 353.1 or E353.2 E353.2
Metals E 200.7 or E200.8 E200.7, E200.8
Mercury E200.7 or E200.8 or E245.l I;:245.1
Gross Alpha E900.0 or E900.1 or E903.0 E903.0
voes SW8260B or SW8260C SW8260C
Chloride A4500-Cl B, A4500-Cl E, or E300.0 E300.0
Fluoride A4500-F C or E300.0 E300.0
Sulfate A4500-S04 E or E300.0 E300.0
TDS A2540C A2540C
Carbonate as C03, Bicarbonate as HC03 A2320B A2320B
Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium, Sodium E200.7 E200.7
E-4 Reporting Limit Evaluation
Piu,ameter P~D\it-Specilied RL
Ammonia (as N) 25 mg/L
Nitrate+ Nitrite (as N) 10 mg/L
Metals ug/L
Arsenic 50
Beryllium 4
Cadmium 5
Chromium 100
Cobalt 730
Copper 1300.
Iron 11000
Lead 15 ·
Manganese 800
Mercury 2
Molybdenum 40
Nickel 100
Selenium 50
Silver 100
Thallium 2
Tin 17000
Uranium 30
Vanadium 60
Zinc 5000
Gross Alpha 15
VOCsug/L
Acetone 700
Benzene 5
Carbon tetrachloride 5
Chloroform 70
Chloromethane 30
MEK 4000
Methylene Chloride 5
Naphthalene 100
Tetrahydrofuran 46
Toluene 1000
Xylenes 10000
Major Ions mg/L
Chloride 1
Fluoride 4
Sulfate 1
IDS 10
Carbonate as C03, Bicarbonate as HC03 Not Specified
Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium, Sodium Not Specified
All analyses were reported to the required RLs unless noted in the text.
E-5: Trip Blank Evaluation
The trip blanks for the 2019 sampling program were nondetect.
Dlank .Sample Date Laboratory
1906343 6/11/2019 AWAL
1903737 3/27/2019 AWAL
E-6 Duplicate Sample Relative Percent Difference
Back Spring
Major Ions (mg/I) Ruin Spring (Duplicate of Ruin RPO%
Spring)
Carbonate <1.0 <l.0 N/C
Bicarbonate 202 202 0.0
Calcium 165 157 5.0
Chloride 23.9 23.7 0.8
Fluoride 0.505 0.46 9.3
Magnesium 45.6 35.7 24.4
Nitrogen-Ammonia <0.05 <0.05 N/C
Nitrogen-Nitrate 1.56 1.65 5.6
Potassium 3.31 3.30 0.3
Sodium 128 119 7.3
Sulfate 474 455 4.1
TDS 900 816 9.8
Metals (ug/1)
Arsenic <5.0 <5.0 N/C
Beryllium <0.5 <0.5 N/C
Cadmium <0.5 <0.5 N/C
Chromium <25 <25 N/C
Cobalt <10 <10 N/C
Copper <10 <10 NIC
Iron <30 <30 N/C
Lead <1.0 <1.0 N/C
Manganese <10 <10 N/C
Mercury <0.5 <0.5 N/C
Molybdenum 20.2 18.7 7.7
Nickel <20 <20 N/C
Selenium 10.8 9.61 11.7
Silver <10 <10 N/C
Thallium <0.5 <0.5 N/C
Tin <100 <100 N/C
Uranium 9.02 9.01 0.1
Vanadium <15 <15 N/C
Zinc <10 <10 N/C
Radiologies (pCi/1)
Gross Alpha <1.00 <1.00 N/C -voes (ug/L) ,~
Acetone <20.0 <20.0 N/C
Benzene <1.00 <l.00 N/C
Carbon tetrachloride <1.00 <1 .00 N/C
Chloroform <l.00 <i.00 N/C
Chloromethane <1.00 <1.00 N/C
MEK <20.0 <20.0 N/C
Methylene Chloride <1.00 <1.00 N/C
E-6 Duplicate Sample Relative Percent Difference
1, Back :Pring
tylajor Ions (mg/I) Ruin (!Ding (Duplicate of Ruin RPO%
11 pring)
Naphthalene <1.00 <1.00 N/C
Tetrahydrofuran <1.00 <1.00 N/C
Toluene <1.00 <1.00 N/C
Xylenes <1.00 <1.00 N/C
N/C = Not Calculated
Per the approved QAP, an RPO greater than 20% is acceptable if the reported re ult · are les
than 5 times the RL. The ere. ults are provided for information only.
* Duplicate eheck reported fer g(O alpha minu RN and U are net %RPO. Caleulated 'lalue
rare eased Gn th:e formula ill the appi;c:>'ved GWDP and QAP.
E-7 Radiologies Counting Error
I Gro AlRha ~bunting
Gro Alpha minu Rn & U Error~ Within
Sample ID minus Rn & hl Precision (±) 20% GWQS GWQS
Cotton,w0od
Sprin,g <1.0 0.257 NIA 15 NIA
Entrance Seep 2.63 0.455 y 15 NIA
Back Spring.
~duplicate of Ruin
Sp.ring) <1.0 0.158 NIA 15 NIA
Ruin Spiing <1.0 0.106 NIA 15 NIA
Wes~wa:ter Seep <1.0 0.270 NIA 15 NIA
NIA -The sample results are non-detect and the QAP required checks are not applicable.
E-8: Laboratory Matrix QC
Matrix Spike % Recovery Comparison
MS MSD REC
Lab Report Well Analyte %REC %REC Range RPD
1906343 Ruin Spring Calcium* NC NC 70 -130 NC
1906343 Ruin Spring Magnesium* NC NC 70-130 NC
1906343 Ruin Spring Sodium* NC NC 70 -130 NC
1906343 Entrance Seep Ammonia (as N) 120 125 90-110 12.]
1903737 Westwater Seep Sodium* NC NC 70 -130 NC
* Recovery was not calculated as the analyte level in the sample was greater than 4 times the spike amount.
NA = QC was not performed on an EFRI sample.
Laboratory Duplicate % Recovery Comparison
Lao
II Sample Duplicar~ I
' Re ult R-esull
Lab.Repe11t We11 Analyte (,mglL) (mg/L) RPli> % Rl?DRange n
1906343 Entrance Seep TDS 1010 892 12.2 5
Surrogate % Recovery
All surrogate recoveries were within the laboratory established acceptance limits.
Method/Laboratory Reagent Blank detections
All method blank results were within the laboratory established acceptance limits.
RPD
LIMIT
20
20
20
IO
20
TabF
CSV Transmittal
Kathy Weinel
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Dear Mr. Goble,
Kathy Weinel
Tuesday, January 14, 2020 12:43 PM
Phillip Goble
'Dean Henderson'; Paul Goranson; David Frydenlund; Terry Slade; Logan Shumway; Scott
Bakken
Transmittal of CSV Files White Mesa Mill 2019 Annual Seeps and Springs Monitoring
475027.csv; 481772.csv; 1903737-report-EDD.csv; 1906343-report-EDD.csv
Attached to this e-mail are the electronic copies of laboratory results for the annual seeps and springs monitoring
conducted at the White Mesa Mill during 2019, in Comma Separated Value (CSV) format.
Please contact me at 303-389-4134 if you have any questions on this transmittal.
Yours Truly
Kathy Weinel
eF --· Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
Kathy Weiner
Quality Assurance Manager
t: 303.389.4134 It: 303.389.4125
225 Union Blvd., Suite 600
Lakewood, CO 80228
http://www.energyfuels.com
This e-mail is intended for the exclusive use of person(s) mentioned as the recipient(s). This message and any attached files with it are confidential and may
contain privileged or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient(s) please delete this message and notify the sender. You may not use, distribute
print or copy this message if you are not the intended recipient(s).
1