HomeMy WebLinkAboutDRC-2017-010802 - 0901a068807b3270Craig C. Coburn [0688]
Lincoln Harris [8196]
Brian D. Bolinder [11032]
RICHARDS BRANDT MILLER NELSON
Wells Fargo Center, 15th Floor
299 South Main Street (84111)
P. O. Box 2465
Salt Lake City, Utah 84110-2465
Telephone: (801)531-2000
Facsimile: (801)532-5506
craig-coburn@rbmn.com
lincoln-harris@rbmn.com
brian-bolinder@rbmn.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
IN THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
IN AND FOR SAN JUAN COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH
DENISON MINES (USA) CORP., a Delaware
corporation; et al.,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
KGL Associates, Inc., a Colorado corporation,
Defendant.
ORDER:
CONFIRMING ARBITRATION AWARD
[Proposed]
Case No. 100700151
Hon. Lyle R. Anderson
Plaintiffs Denison Mines (USA) Corp.’s and Denison White Mesa, LLC’s (“Denison”)
Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award and defendant KGL, Inc.’s (“KGL”) Motion to Vacate
Arbitration Award came on for hearing before the Court, sitting in Grand County, on July 15, 2014
at 1:00 p.m., with the parties being represented by their respective counsel of record. The Court,
The Order of Court is stated below:
Dated:August 27, 2014 /s/Lyle R. Anderson
04:12:28 PM District Court Judge
August 27, 2014 04:12 PM 1 of 5
having read the parties’ memoranda and heard the arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing
therefore, hereby makes the following findings of fact, reaches the following conclusion of law, and
orders as follows:
Findings of Fact
1. The parties’ arbitration agreement as modified by the parties during the process
contemplated that the Arbitrator would issue a brief reasoned interim award on the merits, not to
exceed five pages, on or before January 10, 2014.
2. At the conclusion of the evidentiary hearing, the Arbitrator advised that, due to the
complexity of the issues presented, his interim award may exceed five pages and he did not know
how long the interim award would be. Neither party objected.
3. On the evening of January 10, 2014, the Arbitrator advised the parties that he was
experiencing technical difficulties issuing the Interim Award and that he would issue the Interim
Award on January 11, 2014.
4. Neither party objected to this proposal.
5. On January 11, 2014, the Arbitrator issued an 18-page Interim Award..
6. The Interim Award awarded damages to Denison, subject to Denison submitting verified
statements confirming “that the costs in the records total said amounts and that they do not arise
from other causes.”
7. KGL objected to the Interim Award and the Arbitrator’s request, and asked the Arbitrator
to modify the Interim Award to, inter alia, reject Denison’s claims.
8. Denison responded to the Arbitrator’s request by submitting a Verification Statement in
which it maintained that the damages evidence it had presented at the evidentiary hearing was
August 27, 2014 04:12 PM 2 of 5
sufficient and to which it attached three declarations from three individuals who had testified at the
evidentiary hearing.
9. The Arbitrator, on February 28, 2015 at 2:15 PM, issued a document titled “Arbitrator
Ruling on KGL Objections and Other Considerations.” In this document the Arbitrator stated that he
“reconsidered the Interim Award” and based upon his reconsideration of the record, decided not to
consider Denison’s verifications.
10. KGL renewed its objections based upon the document titled “Arbitrator Ruling on KGL
Objections and Other Considerations” prior to the issuance of the document titled “Final Award.”
11. The Arbitrator subsequently issued a Final Award on February 28, 2014, that finalized
his decision in favor of Denison, including his finding that Denison was the prevailing party under
Utah Code Ann. 38-1a-707.
12. Thereafter Denison and KGL filed motions to confirm and vacate the Final Award,
respectively.
13. KGL has not demonstrated that the arbitration process was at any time anything other
than fair and honest or that the Arbitrator in any manner did not respect and protect the parties’
substantial rights.
14. KGL has not been prejudiced by the Arbitrator or his conduct.
Conclusions of Law
1. KGL’s objection to the timeliness of the Interim Award under Utah Code Ann. § 78B-11-
120 does not warrant vacatur of the Final Award.
2. The Arbitrator did not exceed his authority.
3. The Arbitrator did not exhibit evident partiality in favor of Denison.
August 27, 2014 04:12 PM 3 of 5
4. The Arbitrator conducted the arbitration process fairly and honestly and in a manner that
respected and did not prejudice the substantial rights of either KGL or Denison.
ORDER
Based on the foregoing and good cause appearing therefore:
1. Denison’s Motion to Confirm the Arbitrator’s Final Award is granted;
2. KGL’s Motion to Vacate the Arbitrator’s Final Award is denied; and
3. Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. 78B-11-126(2), Denison is further awarded its attorneys’ fees
and costs incurred in conjunction with its Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award and in opposing
KGL’s Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award, to be established by a supplemental affidavit of such
fees and costs.
Signed after reading defendant's objection. LRA
END OF ORDER
OFFICIAL SIGNATURE APPEARS AT THE TOP OF THE FIRST PAGE
Approved as to form:
_______________________________
James J. Hartnett
Faegre Baker Daniels LLP
Attorneys for KGL Associates, Inc.
August 27, 2014 04:12 PM 4 of 5
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 8th day of August, 2014, I electronically filed the foregoing
ORDER: CONFIRMING ARBITRATION AWARD (PROPOSED) with the Clerk of the Court
and notification of such filing was sent to the following by the means indicated below:
Mark L. Poulsen
NELSON SNUFFER DAHLE & POULSEN
10885 South State Street
Sandy, UT 84070-4104
mlpoulsen@nsdplaw.com
Attorneys for Defendant KGL
¨ U.S. Mail – Postage Prepaid
¨ Overnight Mail - Postage Prepaid
¨ Hand Delivery
¨ Facsimile
þ Electronic Mail
James J. Hartnett
Michael B. Lapicola
FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP
2200 Wells Fargo Center
90 South Seventh Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402-3901
James.Hartnett@FaegreBD.com
Mike.Lapicola@FaegreBD.com
Attorneys for Defendant KGL
¨ U.S. Mail – Postage Prepaid
¨ Overnight Mail - Postage Prepaid
¨ Hand Delivery
¨ Facsimile
þ Electronic Mail
/s/ Lenora G. Spencer
G:\EDSI\DOCS\18647\0002\1163275.DOCX
August 27, 2014 04:12 PM 5 of 5