HomeMy WebLinkAboutDERR-2024-007841Kennecott South Facilities Kennecott South Facilities
Groundwater RemediationGroundwater Remediation
ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT 2005ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT 2005
Kelly Payne, Kennecott Utah CopperKelly Payne, Kennecott Utah Copper
August 2, 2006August 2, 2006
TonightTonight’’s Discussions Discussion
Zone A Water Quality MonitoringZone A Water Quality Monitoring
––SulfateSulfate
––AluminumAluminum
Water Level MonitoringWater Level Monitoring
Subsidence MonitoringSubsidence Monitoring
Annual Groundwater Annual Groundwater
ExtractionExtraction
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Ac
r
e
-
F
e
e
t
P
e
r
Y
e
a
r
Acid Plume
Zone A Sulfate Plume
2005 Sulfate Map2005 Sulfate Map
Sulfate: Plume InteriorSulfate: Plume Interior
Continued decreases in sulfate Continued decreases in sulfate
concentrationsconcentrations
Continued contraction of 20,000 and Continued contraction of 20,000 and
10,000 mg/l isoconcentration contours10,000 mg/l isoconcentration contours
Some expansion of 5,000 mg/l Some expansion of 5,000 mg/l
isoconcentration contour on eastisoconcentration contour on east
<Plot 1146><Plot 1146>
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
S
O
42-
(m
g
/
L
)
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
ECG1124A
ECG1124B
ECG1124C
ECG1146
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
A
B
C
E
Sulfate: KUCC Deep Well Sulfate: KUCC Deep Well
FieldField
Extraction well sulfate essentially Extraction well sulfate essentially
constantconstant
Steady to increasing sulfate Steady to increasing sulfate
concentrations adjacent to extraction concentrations adjacent to extraction
wellswells
Steady to decreasing sulfate Steady to decreasing sulfate
concentrations in surrounding wellsconcentrations in surrounding wells
Southeast MarginSoutheast Margin
Sulfate concentrations increasing in Sulfate concentrations increasing in
wells adjacent to plume interiorwells adjacent to plume interior
Wells on outer margin have essentially Wells on outer margin have essentially
steady sulfate concentrationssteady sulfate concentrations
ModellingModelling suggests some water with suggests some water with
elevated sulfate may not be captured elevated sulfate may not be captured
by existing barrier well networkby existing barrier well network
<Plot><Plot>
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
S
O
42-
(m
g
/
L
)
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
BSG1133A
BSG1133B
BSG1133C
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
A
B
C
<Plot><Plot>
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
S
O
42-
(m
g
/
L
)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
BSG1132A
BSG1132B
BSG1132C
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
A
B
C
Southeast Margin Southeast Margin
ResponseResponse
Better understandingBetter understanding
––GeophysicsGeophysics
––Additional Monitoring WellsAdditional Monitoring Wells
––Update flow and transport modelsUpdate flow and transport models
Possible MitigationPossible Mitigation
––New acid wellNew acid well
––New barrier wellNew barrier well
––Natural AttenuationNatural Attenuation
Sulfate: West Jordan Well Sulfate: West Jordan Well
FieldField
Steady to decreasing sulfate Steady to decreasing sulfate
concentrations in monitor wellsconcentrations in monitor wells
Overall concentration in West Jordan Overall concentration in West Jordan
Production well W363 appears to be Production well W363 appears to be
decreasingdecreasing
<Plot><Plot>
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
S
O
42-
(m
g
/
L
)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
WJG1169A
WJG1169B
WJG1169C
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
A
B
C
<Plot><Plot>
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
S
O
42-
(m
g
/
L
)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
WJG1170A
WJG1170B
WJG1170C
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
A
B
C
<Plot><Plot>
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
S
O
42-
(m
g
/
L
)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
WJG1154A
WJG1154B
WJG1154C
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
A
B
C
<Plot><Plot>
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
S
O
42-
(m
g
/
L
)
0
50
100
150
200
W363
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
AluminumAluminum
Overall decrease in aluminum Overall decrease in aluminum
concentration in core of plumeconcentration in core of plume
Aluminum mass balance calculations Aluminum mass balance calculations
indicate substantial progressindicate substantial progress
Aluminum Mass RemovalAluminum Mass Removal
Modeled Mass and Volume EstimatesModeled Mass and Volume Estimates
Year Soil Volume
(cubic feet)
Annual
change
Chemical Mass*
(kg)
Annual
change
1996 13,166,000,000 20,293,000
1997 13,249,000,000 0.6% 21,324,000 5.1%
1998 13,931,000,000 5.1% 21,643,000 1.5%
1999 14,285,000,000 2.5% 19,995,000 -7.6%
2000 13,774,000,000 -3.6% 18,018,000 -9.9%
2001 13,753,000,000 -0.2% 17,157,000 -4.8%
2002 13,935,000,000 1.3% 14,097,000 -18%
2003 13,194,000,000 -5.3% 12,149,000 -14%
2004 12,867,000,000 -2.5% 10,392,000 -14%
2005 12,444,000,000 -3.3% 8,810,000 -15%
Total -722,000,000 -5.5% -11,483,000 -57%
¾¾Pumping data indicate 12.5 million kg aluminum Pumping data indicate 12.5 million kg aluminum
removed 1996removed 1996 --20052005
Aluminum Mass RemovalAluminum Mass Removal
-2,000,000
0
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
14,000,000
16,000,000
18,000,000
20,000,000
22,000,000
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Al
M
a
s
s
(
k
g
)
Al Removed by Extraction Wells
Cumulative Decrease in Al Mass in Plume
Total Dissolved Al Mass in Plume
SubsidenceSubsidence
0.066---4944.0134943.947---1/4 Section 13/14
0.095---5205.4285205.333---1973 West
0.0940.0465342.095341.9965341.95K105
0.0220.0055078.0325078.015078.004BSG1180
0.103-0.154968.1194968.0164968.166WJG1170
0.0690.0134997.3444997.2754997.262BFG1156A
0.075-0.0414941.6244941.5494941.591BSG1137
0.107-0.0165251.0765250.9695250.985ECG1124
0.075-0.0015318.5935318.5185318.519ECG1116
4/5/05
Survey
2004-05
Difference
(ft)
2002-04
Difference
(ft)
3/11/04
Survey
12/19/02
SurveySurvey Site
Subsidence Survey Data (Elevation Feet AMSL)