DERR-2024-007751

Results for Method Development and Analytical Services for Water Samples from the Great Salt Lake
Prepared for Bill Adams
Kennecott
Magna, UT
[e-mail]

Prepared by M.B. Miller, IV
Frontier Geosciences Inc.
Seattle, Washington
[phone]
[e-mail]

SECTION 1
DETERMINATION OF Al AND OTHER TRACE ELEMENTS IN GREAT SALT LAKE
USING ICP-DRC-MS

We have designed an experiment to determine the concentration of Al in Great Salt Lake using
our state-of-the-art Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer instrument equipped with a
dynamic reaction cell. This device can eliminate matrix interferences and therefore provide
lower detection limits than conventional instruments. This reaction cell between the ion optics
and the mass analyzer quadrupole is filled wit h a reactive gas such as NH3 during analysis. Since
the reaction gas reacts only with the interfering species, most interferences are eliminated with
no loss in analyte signal. In our lab, we have been using NH3 and O2 for the determination of a
suite of trace elements but since this project focused on Al mostly, we have decided to use only
NH3.

In addition to Al, we have monitored other trace elements that could be determined in seawaters
using NH3 as the reaction gas. These elements were Pb, Se, Cr, Fe, Zn, Cu, Co, and Ni. In
addition to these elements, Cd and As could also be determined with this technique (also with
much lower detection limits) but they require the use of O2 and therefore not included in this
short study.

The common interferences in the determination of Al by ICP-MS is due to the formation of
various isotopic combinations of CN+ species. In addition, inductively coupled plasmas are
obtained at atmospheric pressure, and there is always the tail of the highly abundant N2 peak. In
this pro ject we have conducted the same set of experiments using two different conditions, one
conventional plasma conditions, and the other at high oxide conditions in the plasma. In
conventional ICP-MS analysis, formation of oxides in the plasma causes false signals for some
elements such as Cd (due to MoO), and Ni, Zn, Co (due to CaO). For some elements that do not
form oxides or are not affected by them somewhat increased sensitivity can be achieved by
running at high oxide levels due to higher sample introduct ion efficiencies. We have conducted
the same set of experiments at two different nebulizer gas flows representing two different oxide
levels and therefore different sensitivities.

In order to determine the best analysis scheme for Al, we have analyzed the provided GSL
sample at 3 different dilutions (1:10, 1:25, and 1:50). For each dilution, matrix spikes were also
prepared. All results including Reference Materials (NIST 1640 and TMDW) are presented in
the below tables.

Because of the much higher dissolved solids content of the Great Salt Lake sample, signal
depression was observed at all dilutions. The signal depression was much more evident at the
1:10 level (~50%). The signal depression requires the choice of the right internal standard in
order to co rrect for this effect. We have reprocessed the data with three different internal
standards: Rh, Ga, and Y. It was found that Ga is a more appropriate internal standard that
produced better recoveries for the spikes. As a result, Ga was used as the internal for all analytes
measured except Pb and Se for which Y was used.

It was also determined that higher sensitivity at higher nebulizer gas flow produced better
sensitivity without causing interference issues as determined by similar results for all analytes at
each dilution.

At 25 and 50 fold dilutions, the concentrations of most analytes including Al were very close to
the detection limits which resulted in high relative standard deviations. On the other hand, at the
10 fold dilution level, the recoveries of the spikes were not 100% but still within our general
QA/QC limits of ±25% even for a difficult matrix like the Great Salt Lake water. This could be
due to the fact that the spike concentration was too close to the native concentration. Even
though the 10-fold dilution is harsh to the instrument, for a small batch of samples, it should be a
suitable for the suite of elements monitored in this research study.

I would like to add that in this study, we didn’t look at As and Cd since they require the use of
O2 as the reaction gas. For seawaters (1:10 dilution), we have determined MDL values of 130
and 5 ng/L for As and Cd, respectively. Therefore, these elements could be added to the suite if
requested.

Table 1 Results of the Reference Materials with ICP-DRC-MS.
Analyte m/z Average %RSD TV %Recovery
Al 27 55.6 4 52.0 107
Pb 208 29.2 2 27.9 105
Se 82 23.9 2 22.0 109
Cr 52 39.5 1 38.6 102
Fe 54 35.5 2 34.3 103
Cu 65 91.3 0.5 85.2 107
Co 59 21.8 0.1 20.3 107
Ni 58 28.8 0.3 27.4 105
Zn 64 55.8 2 53.2 105
n=3
Analyte m/z Average %RSD TV %Recovery
Al 27 129 1 120 107
Pb 208 39.5 1 40.0 99
Se 82 9.4 1 10.0 94
Cr 52 20.4 1 20.0 102
Fe 54 99.4 0.3 100.0 99
Cu 65 19.8 2 20.0 99
Co 59 25.1 1 25.0 100
Ni 58 58.8 1 60.0 98
Zn 64 72.2 1 70.0 103
n=3
NIST 1640 (mg/L)
TMDW (mg/L)

Table 2 Method detection limits for GSL waters
MDL (in mg/L)
No Dil. 10X 25X 50X
Al 27 0.030 0.300 0.751 1.502
Pb 208 0.006 0.056 0.141 0.282
Se 82 0.011 0.113 0.282 0.564
Cr 52 0.016 0.164 0.410 0.819
Fe 54 0.010 0.097 0.243 0.486
Cu 65 0.014 0.135 0.338 0.676
Co 59 0.003 0.034 0.086 0.171
Ni 58 0.002 0.023 0.057 0.113
Zn 64 0.002 0.021 0.053 0.106

Table 3 Analytical Results and Spike Recoveries for GSL water

Analyte m/z Average %RSD Spike Measured %RSD % Recovery
Al 27 3.088 13 12.5 15.29 9 98
Pb 208 1.163 2 12.5 12.60 7 91
Se 82 0.773 11 12.5 12.58 3 94
Cr 52 0.350 28 12.5 13.20 1 103
Fe 54 3.944 13 12.5 16.59 1 101
Cu 65 4.850 2 12.5 15.44 2 85
Co 59 0.871 8 12.5 13.54 3 101
Ni 58 1.472 11 12.5 12.73 2 90
1:
5
0

Zn 64 2.240 12 12.5 12.17 4 79
n=3 n=3

Analyte m/z Average %RSD Spike Measured %RSD % Recovery
Al 27 2.684 55 6.25 7.491 7 77
Pb 208 1.250 8 6.25 6.410 1 83
Se 82 1.096 10 6.25 6.041 2 79
Cr 52 0.255 5 6.25 6.052 1 93
Fe 54 2.954 19 6.25 8.133 5 83
Cu 65 5.508 14 6.25 9.543 1 65
Co 59 0.837 3 6.25 6.697 2 94
Ni 58 1.366 11 6.25 6.258 2 78
1:
2
5

Zn 64 2.626 26 6.25 6.105 3 56
n=3 n=3

Analyte m/z Average %RSD Spike Measured %RSD % Recovery
Al 27 2.390 1 2.5 4.346 10 78
Pb 208 0.995 6 2.5 3.554 4 102
Se 82 0.970 11 2.5 2.941 4 79
Cr 52 0.177 3 2.5 2.228 2 82
Fe 54 1.739 9 2.5 4.329 15 104
Cu 65 4.341 2 2.5 6.138 3 72
Co 59 0.820 3 2.5 2.892 2 83
Ni 58 1.074 3 2.5 2.737 3 67
1:
1
0

Zn 64 2.020 2 2.5 3.394 10 55
n=3 n=3

Section 2
Method Development for Reductive Precipitation of Great Salt Lake water samples

The reductive precipitation technique was applied to this matrix specifically for the
determination of zinc. The method does not work for aluminum and Frontier Geosciences has
other standard methods in place for the determination of the other metals requested by the client.
Other metals were simultaneously determined by this method, and the data for all applicable
metals are included in this report for comparison.

The samples were composited, filtered, split, and preserved to 0.099% nitric acid. Aliquots of
the preserved sample were prepared by reductive precipitation. The reductive precipitation
procedure entails the concentration of the metals of interest through selective precipitation, co-
precipitation, and chelation, followed by separation from the matrix by filtration. The aqueous
matrix is disposed of while the metals that were collected on the filter are redissolved in a
relatively simple acidic matrix that is amenable to analysis by standard methodologies. This
procedure serves not only to eliminate the prohibitive sample matrix, but it also lowers detection
limits by concentrating the analytes into a smaller volume than that of the original sample.

Three sample sizes (200 mL, 100 mL, and 50 mL) were tested in anticipation of any difficulties
that might result from the very high dissolved solids content of the water. Samples and matrix
spikes were prepared in triplicate for each sample size. The spiking concentrations were tailored
to the samples in order to verify the ability to quantitate at the levels indigenous to the matrix.
The sample batch also included three preparation blanks, three spiked blanks, and a Certified
Reference Material (CASS-4). The prepared samples were analyzed by ICP-MS. Table 4
summarizes the QC data for the analytical batch.

Table 4. QC data for Great Salt Lake sample batch

Analyte Isotope MDL Preparation CASS-4 Spike Blanks
Blanks Spike Recovery
Mean* T.V. Measured Recovery Mean* RSD
µg/L µg/L µg/L %R µg/L %R %
Zinc 66Zn 0.076 0.097 0.381 0.28 72.8% 2.5 74.7% 20.1%
Arsenic 75As 0.009 <0.009 1.110 0.89 79.9% 25.0 78.9% 1.2%
Cadmium 114Cd 0.004 <0.004 0.026 0.034 129% § 0.10 82.2% 6.2%
Copper 65Cu 0.064 0.069 0.592 0.51 85.5% 5.0 76.9% 2.5%
Lead 206,207,208Pb 0.013 0.043 0.010 <0.013 1.0 96.1% 3.4%
Nickel 60Ni 0.033 <0.033 0.314 0.26 82.7% 1.0 76.3% 1.7%
Selenium 77Se 0.022 <0.022 NC <0.022 0.50 68.7% 5.6%
* n=3 § Mo interference on Cd NC = not certified

As noted in the table, the high recovery for cadmium in CASS-4 may be due to an interference
from molybdenum. The reductive precipitation sample matrix makes it difficult to compensate
for this interference through the use of standard ICP-MS interelement corrections. Molybdenum
was found to be in the Great Salt Lake (>100 µg/L in the concentrate) in sufficient quantities to
warrant concern about a positive bias on the cadmium data.

Tables 5 through 7 show the analytical and QC results for the three sizes of Great Salt Lake
samples employed in this study.

Table 5. QC data for Great Salt Lake samples (50 mL sample)
Analyte Isotope MDL Great Salt Lake
Sample Concentration Matrix Spikes
Mean* RSD Spike Mean Recovery* RSD
µg/L % µg/L %R %
Zinc 66Zn 0.30 2.70 27.9% 0.75 42.7% 5.2%
Arsenic 75As 0.038 80.9 4.6% 7.5 54.0% 20.0%
Cadmium 114Cd 0.015 0.081 7.2% 0.030 79.1% 5.2%
Copper 65Cu 0.25 5.41 24.5% 1.5 63.6% 4.7%
Lead 206,207,208Pb 0.050 1.13 9.6% 0.30 87.6% 6.0%
Nickel 60Ni 0.13 1.02 7.0% 0.30 76.7% 2.2%
Selenium 77Se 0.090 <0.090 3.3% 0.15 70.2% 2.2%
Arsenic over range * n=3

Table 6. QC data for Great Salt Lake samples (100 mL sample)
Analyte Isotope MDL Great Salt Lake
Sample Concentration Matrix Spikes
Mean* RSD Spike Mean Recovery* RSD
µg/L % µg/L %R %
Zinc 66Zn 0.15 1.84 2.9% 1.3 75.3% 8.0%
Arsenic 75As 0.019 70.9 2.8% 12.5 93.4% 3.5%
Cadmium 114Cd 0.007 0.081 1.1% 0.05 79.8% 4.7%
Copper 65Cu 0.13 4.32 1.5% 12.5 76.4% 1.9%
Lead 206,207,208Pb 0.025 1.05 2.4% 0.5 96.5% 3.3%
Nickel 60Ni 0.067 0.93 1.5% 0.5 76.3% 0.4%
Selenium 77Se 0.045 0.079 4.5% 0.25 67.3% 4.2%
Arsenic over range * n=3

Table 7. QC data for Great Salt Lake samples (200 mL sample)
Analyte Isotope MDL Great Salt Lake
Sample Concentration Matrix Spikes
Mean* RSD Spike Mean Recovery* RSD
µg/L % µg/L %R %
Zinc 66Zn 0.076 2.10 0.5% 2.5 67.4% 3.0%
Arsenic 75As 0.009 75.4 2.7% 25.0 68.5% 3.7%
Cadmium 114Cd 0.004 0.072 3.8% 0.10 83.6% 2.5%
Copper 65Cu 0.064 4.29 2.6% 5.0 76.3% 2.9%
Lead 206,207,208Pb 0.013 1.09 2.5% 1.0 97.7% 3.4%
Nickel 60Ni 0.033 0.91 2.6% 1.0 73.6% 2.7%
Selenium 77Se 0.022 0.046 16.1% 0.50 40.8% 38.5%
Arsenic over range * n=3
The smallest sample size (50 mL) exhibited some of the poorest precision. While the aliquot
size was adequate to detect zinc and most of the other elements presented in Table 2, the low

concentrations were evidently susceptible to contamination. The effect is only exaggerated with
the use of large correction factors used to account for sample pre-concentration.

The intermediate sample size (100 mL) presented no particular difficulties. The data in Table 3
illustrate the overall best performance of this method for most of the metals of interest.

The largest sample size (200 mL) presented a number of experimental difficulties due to the high
level of dissolved solids in the samples. While the analytical performance (Table 4) was not
gravely affected, there were physical problems in the preparation and analysis. There was a
great deal of precipitate. This in itself suggests that calcium and magnesium were precipitating
in some great quantity. This reduces the degree of separation of analytes from matrix and it
slows the filtration. Furthermore, extra rinsing becomes necessary in order to eliminate as much
of the precipitated matrix as possible. However the filters become so thoroughly clogged with
these samples that rinsing becomes impractical. Furthermore, some of the precipitate was
always lost through adherence to the walls and neck of the filter funnel.

The sheer quantity of precipitate caused problems for the digestion step as well. A good deal of
undissolved matter remained after the digestion procedure was completed. The method
performance for this sample size is comparable to that achieved with the intermediate sample
size, but the presence of undissolved material in the digest poses a hazard to the analytical
system because of the possibility that particulate matter may clog the ICP-MS sample
introduction system.

Section 3
Analysis of Great Salt Lake samples by ICP-MS following extraction of
Cd, Cu, Pb and Ni by Co-APDC Co- precipitation.

A sample of water from the Great Salt Lake Utah was received and filtered through a
0.45um Gelman type in-line filter. The filt rate was then preserved to 0.099% nitric acid.
The sample was prepared for analysis on a Perkin-Elmer ELAN 6000 ICP-MS system
using a quantitative extraction/ preconcentration technique which allows for the
simultaneous co-precipitation of lead, copper, cadmium and nickel from seawater and
other difficult matrices. This procedure serves not only to eliminate the prohibitive
sample matrix, but it also lowers detection limits by concentrating the analytes into a
smaller volume than that of the original sample

The sample was prepared in duplicate using a variety of aliquot sizes in anticipation of
any possible issues arising from the high dissolved solid in the sample. Matrix spikes
were prepared at the same time at three different concentrations allowing for spike
recoveries and a method of standard additions to be calculated, for each aliquot size.
The digestion batch (in addition to matrix QC) included:

· Four preparation blanks
· One blank spike
· Two certified reference materials (including CASS-4, a seawater CRM)

The maximum volume of sample which can be concentrated, by the method, is 200ml.
When less sample volume is used, the final volume is raised to 200ml by the addition of
ultra pure milli-Q (reagent water). This method is particularly prone to fluctuations in the
pH of the sample. The final aliquot should have a pH of 1.9 for maximum extraction
efficiency. Samples have their pH adjusted to reflect this requirement.

The sample in question was prepared using the following aliquot sizes: 200ml, 100ml,
50ml, 25ml, 10ml, and 5ml. Once the samples have been brought to 200ml (if using less
than 200ml sample) and pH adjusted, 1ml of both cobalt (II) solution and APDC (the
complexing agent) was added. This forms a precipitate. The sample was capped and left
overnight. The precipitate was collected the following day by filtration and re-dissolved
in concentrated nitric acid, then diluted in 5.0 % HNO3. Analysis is performed by ICP-
MS using online internal standardization and robust plasma conditions.

A number of issues arose with this digestion batch. The 200ml and 100ml aliquots proved
difficult to filter due to the clogging of the filters by a large amount of precipitate.
Recovery in the blank spikes and reference materials also proved unreliable. The poor
recoveries are possibly the result of using a partly degraded complexing agent or the
presence of organics in the water supply. These issues were addressed and a second
digestion was performed.

The second batch comprised:

· Four preparation blanks
· One blank spike
· Two certified reference materials (including CASS-4, a seawater CRM)
· The sample prepared in duplicate using two aliquot sizes (50ml and 25ml)
· Matrix spike and spike duplicates for each aliquot size

Results for both digestion batches are given below.

Table 8 QC Data for Digestion Batch 1
Analyte Isotope MDL Preparation CASS-4 Blank Spike
Blanks Spike
Mean T.V. Measured Recovery Mean*
µg/L µg/L µg/L %Rec µg/L %Rec
Cadmium 114Cd 0.0133 0.0049 0.026 0.048 184.7% 0.250 3809%
Copper 65Cu 0.0402 0.1635 0.592 0.495 83.6% 3.125 96.8%
Lead 208Pb 0.0174 0.0174 0.010 4.936 50367 0.625 66.5%
Nickel 60Ni 0.0412 0.1730 0.314 0.2658 84.6% 3.125 66.5%

Table 9. QC data for Great Salt Lake samples (200 mL sample). Batch 1
Analyte Isotope MDL Great Salt Lake
Sample Concentration Matrix Spikes
Mean (mg/L) %RSD
Slope
(av % rec)
Correlation
coefficient Intercept
Cadmium 114Cd 0.0027 0.1299 15.1 0.4047 0.9991 0.3635
Copper 65Cu 0.0080 5.178 2.5 0.8072 0.9998 5.838
Lead 208Pb 0.0035 0.6165 1.1 0.5103 0.9605 0.6404
Nickel 60Ni 0.0082 1.238 6.3 0.6552 0.9999 1.348

Table 10. QC data for Great Salt Lake samples (100 mL sample). Batch1
Analyte Isotope MDL Great Salt Lake
Sample Concentration Matrix Spikes
Mean (mg/L) %RSD
Slope
(av % rec)
Correlation
coefficient Intercept
Cadmium 114Cd 0.0053 0.1399 6.8 0.5108 0.9960 0.2698
Copper 65Cu 0.0161 4.830 10.3 0.9397 0.9992 5.114
Lead 208Pb 0.0070 0.7388 6.8 0.7274 0.9944 1.002
Nickel 60Ni 0.0165 1.207 29.2 0.6959 0.9994 1.473

Table 11. QC data for Great Salt Lake samples (50 mL sample). Batch 1
Analyte Isotope MDL Great Salt Lake
Sample Concentration Matrix Spikes
Mean (mg/L) %RSD Slope
Correlation
coefficient Intercept
Cadmium 114Cd 0.0106 0.1502 0.7 0.6739 0.994 0.2387
Copper 65Cu 0.0322 5.319 4.8 0.8893 0.9987 6.329
Lead 208Pb 0.014 0.8286 4.0 0.7091 0.9603 1.222
Nickel 60Ni 0.0330 1.739 0.8 0.7371 0.999 2.525

Table 12. QC data for Great Salt Lake samples (25 mL sample). Batch 1
Analyte Isotope MDL Great Salt Lake
Sample Concentration Matrix Spikes
Mean (mg/L)) %RSD
Slope
(av % rec)
Correlation
coefficient Intercept
Cadmium 114Cd 0.0177 0.1310 11.1 0.5272 0.9974 0.2551
Copper 65Cu 0.0536 5.204 6.7 0.7907 0.9969 6.1763
Lead 208Pb 0.0233 0.8624 3.9 0.4695 0.8291 1.762
Nickel 60Ni 0.0550 2.432 7.2 0.5762 0.9999 4.014

Table 13. QC data for Great Salt Lake samples (10 mL sample). Batch 1
Analyte Isotope MDL Great Salt Lake
Sample Concentration Matrix Spikes
Mean (mg/L) %RSD
Slope
(av % rec)
Correlation
coefficient Intercept
Cadmium 114Cd 0.0531 0.1540 5.6 0.5967 0.9855 0.3146
Copper 65Cu 0.1609 9.251 4.2 0.8895 0.9989 11.08
Lead 208Pb 0.0698 1.333 2.0 0.5476 0.8203 2.642
Nickel 60Ni 0.1650 6.017 2.6 0.6305 0.9995 9.966

Table 14. QC data for Great Salt Lake samples (5 mL sample). Batch 1
Analyte Isotope MDL Great Salt Lake
Sample Concentration Matrix Spikes
Mean (mg/L) %RSD
Slope
(av % rec)
Correlation
coefficient Intercept
Cadmium 114Cd 0.1062 0.1824 2.2 0.7850 0.998 0.2210
Copper 65Cu 0.3218 12.92 12.1 0.6323 0.3092 28.80
Lead 208Pb 0.1395 1.996 6.6 0.6254 0.7332 3.146
Nickel 60Ni 0.3299 12.07 0.8 0.5418 0.3633 29.55

Table 15 QC Data for Digestion Batch 2
Analyte Isotope MDL Preparation CASS-4 Blank Spike
Blanks Spike
Mean T.V. Measured Recovery Mean*
µg/L µg/L µg/L %R µg/L %R
Cadmium 114Cd 0.006 0.006 0.026 0.0386 148.6 0.25 66.2
Copper 65Cu 0.0910 0.1226 0.592 0.4551 76.9 3.125 78.1
Lead 208Pb 0.0149 0.0122 0.0154 0.0081 53.3 0.625 74.9
Nickel 60Ni 0.0512 0.0929 0.314 0.2294 73.0 3.125 56.6

Table 16. QC data for Great Salt Lake samples (50 mL sample). Batch 2
Analyte Isotope MDL Great Salt Lake
Sample Concentration Matrix Spikes
Mean (ug/L) % RPD
Spike
(mg/L) Mean Recovery % %RPD
Cadmium 114Cd 0.0091 0.0525 66.2 1 77.1 3.7
Copper 65Cu 1.4555 3.4312 88.8 10 83.0 4.1
Lead 208Pb 0.2382 0.6118 88.6 2 99.6 1.8
Nickel 60Ni 0.8184 2.2631 20.4 10 83.2 6.6

Table 17. QC data for Great Salt Lake samples (25 mL sample). Batch2
Analyte Isotope MDL Great Salt Lake
Sample Concentration Matrix Spikes
Mean (mg/L) % RPD
Spike
(mg/L) Mean Recovery % %RPD
Cadmium 114Cd 0.0182 0.0820 2.5 1 107.8 5.5
Copper 65Cu 2.9110 4.4539 7.8 10 153.4 2.6
Lead 208Pb 0.4763 0.9673 0.7 2 146.8 0.9
Nickel 60Ni 1.6368 1.8138 37.9 10 130.4 8.4

The results suggest that the best aliquot size to use for the extraction and analysis of this
type of sample would be 50 mLs.

Section 4
ANALYSIS OF GREAT SALT LAKE WATER FOR Se BY HYDRIDE
GENERATION ATOMIC FLOURESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY

A sample of water from the Great Salt Lake Utah was received and filtered through a
0.45um Gelman type in-line filter. The filtrate was then preserved to 0.099% nitric acid.
The sample was prepared for analysis on a PSA Millennium Excalibur atomic
fluorescence spectroscopy system. The sample preparation involves the conversion of all
selenium present in the samples to selenium IV. Selenium IV forms a volatile hydride,
which can be quantitatively measured in the low part per trillion range.

The sample was run in duplicate using two aliquot sizes 2ml (10x) and 4ml (5x) to
determine the most suitable dilution factor and thus detection limit. Matrix spikes were
prepared at the same time at three different concentrations allowing for spike recoveries
and a method of standard additions to be calculated, for each aliquot size.
The digestion batch (in addition to matrix QC) included:

· Four digestion blanks
· Two laboratory controlled water standards
· Two certified reference materials

It was decided to not run the samples less than 5x because of the physical effects of the
high salt concentration on the instruments capabilities.

The results with a five fold dilution are acceptable and within all QA requirements. I
suggest that samples analyzed by this method be run at this dilution.

Results for all aliquot sizes are given below.

Table 16 - Sample Results for Se in GSL Waters
Sample Total Se
ID (ng/L)
Great salt lake water 575.7

Table 17 - QC Sample Summary for Se in GSL Waters

Method Total Se
Blanks (ng/L)
DBW1 16.66
DBW2 12.68
DBW3 26.66
DBW4 7.741
Mean 15.93
Std. Dev. 8.025
Est. MDL 24.08

Table 18 - QC Sample Summary for Se in GSL Waters (continued)

Standard Total Se
Ref. Material (ng/L)
Source HP CRM-SW
Cert. Value 4000
Obs. Value 4238
% Rec. 106.0%

Matrix Total Se Matrix Total Se
QC Sample (ng/L) QC Sample (ng/L)
Sample ID Great salt lake
water
Sample ID Great salt
lake water
Dilution 10 Dilution 5
Sample Conc. 742.3 Sample Conc. 575.7
MD Conc. 722.8 MD Conc. 630.3
RPD 2.7 RPD 9.1
MS Spiking Level 1250 MS Spiking Level 625
MS Conc. 1831 MS Conc. 1230
MS % Rec. 87.9 MS % Rec. 100.4
MSD Spiking Level 2500 MSD Spiking Level 1250
MSD Conc. 3083 MSD Conc. 1788
MSD % Rec. 94.0 MSD % Rec. 94.8
MST Spiking Level 3750 MST Spiking Level 1875
MST Conc. 3932 MST Conc. 2332
MST % Rec. 85.3 MST % Rec. 92.2
MSA Slope 0.868 MSA Slope 0.919
MSA Correlation coefficient 0.997 MSA Correlation coefficient 0.999