DDW-2024-006333

195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144830 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4830
Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone] • T.D.D. [phone]
www.deq.utah.gov
Printed on 100% recycled paper
State of Utah

Drinking Water Board
Kristi Bell, Chair
Eric Franson, P.E., Vice-Chair
Dawn Ramsey
Justin Maughan
Corinna Harris
Jeff Coombs
David O. Pitcher
Blake Tullis, Ph.D.
Kimberly D. Shelley
Nathan Lunstad
Executive Secretary
SPENCER J. COX
Governor
DEIDRE HENDERSON
Lieutenant Governor
Department of
Environmental Quality
Kimberly D. Shelley
Executive Director
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
Nathan Lunstad, P.E.
Director
DRINKING WATER BOARD MEETING
February 29, 9:00 AM
Via Zoom Webinar & In Person:
Dixie Convention Center
1835 S Convention Center Dr,
St. George, UT 84790
Nathan Lunstad Cell # 385-239-5974
AGENDA
1.Call to Order
2.Roll Call – Nathan Lunstad
3.Approval of Meeting Minutes
A.January 9, 2024
4.Disclosure for Conflict of Interest
5.Directors Report – Nathan Lunstad
A.Drinking Water Board Member Recognition of Service; David Pitcher
B.New Board Member; Shazelle Terry
C.New Employees; Russell Seeley, Atie Amirgol, John Steffan, Marisa Mathie
D.Enforcement Report (Board Packet Item Only)
E.Other
6.Rural Water Association – Dale Pierson
A.Report
B.Rural Water Finance Agency (RWFA)
7.Rule Making
A.R309-515 - Source Protection – Deidre Beck
B.R309-600 - Sewers in Source Protection Zones – Deidre Beck
C.R309-540 - Pump Rule – Michael Newberry
8.Financial Assistance Committee Report
A.Status Report – Wayne Boyce
B.Cashflow – Wayne Boyce
Page 2
C.Project Priority List – Michael Grange
D.SRF Applications
i.Federal
a.Salt Lake City - LSL/Federal - Andrea Thurlow
b.Big Plains Water SSD - Michael Grange
c.Wilson Arch - Additional Funding - Heather Pattee
ii.State
a.Holden Town - Extension - Heather Pattee
b.Johnson WID - Extension - Heather Pattee
c.Austin Special Service District - Additional Funding
iii.Deauthorizations
a.Hidden Lake Association - Allyson Spevak
iv.Other Business
a.Disposition of Remaining ARPA Emergency Funds
9.Public Comment Period
10.Open Board Discussion
11.Other
A.Financial Assistance Committee
12.Next Board Meeting
Date: April 30, 2024
Time: 1:00 PM
Place: Multi-Agency State Office Building
195 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84116
13.Adjourn
Agenda Item
3(A)

195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144830 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4830
Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone] • T.D.D. [phone]
www.deq.utah.gov
Printed on 100% recycled paper
State of Utah

Drinking Water Board
Kristi Bell, Chair
Eric Franson, P.E., Vice-Chair
Dawn Ramsey
Justin Maughan
Corinna Harris
Jeff Coombs
David O. Pitcher
Blake Tullis, Ph.D.
Kimberly D. Shelley
Nathan Lunstad
Executive Secretary
SPENCER J. COX
Governor

DEIDRE HENDERSON
Lieutenant Governor
Department of
Environmental Quality

Kimberly D. Shelley
Executive Director

DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
Nathan Lunstad, P.E.
Director

DRINKING WATER BOARD MEETING
January 9, 2024, 1:00 PM
Via Zoom Webinar & In Person:
Multi-Agency State Office Building
195 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84116

DRAFT MINUTES
1. Call to Order

Kristi Bell, Chair, called the Drinking Water Board (Board, DWB) meeting to order at 1:01 PM.

2. Roll Call – Nathan Lunstad

Board Members Present at Roll Call: Kristi Bell, Eric Franson, Justin Maughan, Dawn Ramsey,
Corinna Harris, Blake Tullis, Jeff Coombs, David Pitcher.

Division of Drinking Water (DDW, Division) Staff Present: Nathan Lunstad, Michael Grange,
Jessica Fitzgerald, Wayne Boyce, Rebecca Yoo, Michelle Deras, Allyson Spevak, Linda Ross

3. Approval of Meeting Minutes
A. November 7, 2023

● Eric Franson moved to approve the November 7, 2023, Drinking Water meeting minutes. Jeff
Coombs seconded. The motion was carried unanimously by the Board.

4. Disclosure for Conflict of Interest

None.

5. Director Report – Nathan Lunstad

A. New Employees; Rebecca Yoo

Rebecca Yoo has joined the Permitting section as an Environmental Engineer.

B. Enforcement Report (Board Packet Item Only)

Page 2
The Enforcement Report can be found in the Drinking Water Board Packet.

C. Other

Nathan Lunstad updated the Board on his appointment as Director of the Division of Drinking
Water, announced Friday, January 5, 2024.

6. Rural Water Association Report – Dale Pierson

Dale Pierson, Rural Water Association of Utah (RWAU) Executive Director, noted that the two
(2) contracted RWAU staff reports are available in the packet. He mentioned the absence of a
Development Contract report due to the current pause in that contract, however, it is expected to
resume at the next meeting following its accepted contract proposal.

Dale also informed the Board about the next meeting, which will coincide with the RWAU
Annual Conference in St. George, and extended an invitation to all Board members to attend the
full conference.

7. Financial Assistance Committee Report
A. Status Report – Wayne Boyce

Federal SRF

Wayne Boyce, DDW Financial Manager, highlighted the improved financial position due to
recording another year of grants, resulting in a negative projection of approximately $14 million.
He noted that there have been no other significant changes.

Wayne clarified that the current availability is $103 million in the primary account and $3.7
million in the hardship fund. Accounting for authorizations, closed projects, and considering
Fiscal Year 2024 (FY24) grants, principal and interest payments, and interest earnings, the
authorizations, and commitments exceed expected resources by about $14 million. Wayne
mentioned that the fund balance, approximately $75 million, resides in Fund 5210, the primary
federal account.

ARPA

Approximately $480,000 is available for emergency funding requests, and this allocation must be
utilized by December 31, 2025.

LEAD ARPA

Wayne informed the Board that the available funds for Lead ARPA have changed, and the current
amount is approximately $536,000.

Lead Service Line

Page 3
Wayne directed the Board to page 33 of the Board Packet and highlighted that not much has
changed since the last Board meeting.

Emerging Contaminants

The alignment on Emerging Contaminants funding has changed. After reviewing the projects, the
availability remains approximately the same, with the new grant year contributing up to about $7
million, and an additional $7 million projected for FY24.

State SRF Program

Approximately, the State SRF program has a balance of $26 million, and after authorizations has
an uncommitted balance of approximately $5.5 million.

B. Cashflow – Wayne Boyce

Wayne reported an improvement in the forecast. Where previously, Fiscal Year 2025 (FY25)
showed a balance of less than $5,000, the current projection is up to $13 million available, thanks
to additional grants.

C. SRF Applications
i. Federal
a. Skyline Mountain SSD - extension (Allyson Spevak)

Representing Skyline Mountain SSD was Craig Godwin, Board Chairman.

Allyson reported to the Board an extension request for Skyline Mountain SSD. On January 11,
2022, the Drinking Water Board authorized Skyline Mountain SSD a loan of $3,123,000 for 30
years at 2.09% interest/fee to construct a new 41,000-gallon tank, well house, and to refinance
their existing loan.

The project initially went out to bid in June 2022 and received two bids, both of which were
approximately $2 million, far exceeding the project estimate of $466,000. The project was sent
out to bid once more at the beginning of 2023 and received one bid from a previous 2022
contractor/bidder with a price tag in the same range as their 2022 bid.

The District is taking several steps to mitigate the problems this issue has caused. They are
working to increase rates to meet their current bond obligation and plan for the future. They’re
working with their engineers to find a local Sanpete County contractor to take the project with a
significantly reduced scope. The District believes that with the reduced scope it can complete the
project for far less than the original cost estimate provided to the Drinking Water Board.

The reduced scope will be a 30,000-gallon cement storage tank connected to a very basic fill
station on Thad’s Peak. The tank would also provide significantly improved fire mitigation where
brush trucks could fill, and helicopters could fill from a deployed “pumpkin” tank should there be
a fire emergency.

Page 4
Division of Drinking Water Staff recommended that the Drinking Water Board authorize a one-
year extension to Skyline Mountain SSD.

Craig Godwin, Chairman of the Board at Skyline Mountain SSD, updated the Board, stating
they've reached out to contractors in Sanpete County. Currently, two contractors are bidding on
the project, expressing confidence that they will find contractors who understand the project's
requirements.

● Eric Franson moved that the Drinking Water Board authorize a one-year extension to Skyline
Mountain SSD. Dawn Ramsey seconded. The motion was carried unanimously by the Board.

8. Public Comment Period

None.

9. Open Board Discussion

Eric Franson inquired about the recent email discussing the restart of the SRF funding process,
seeking clarification on this timeframe. He also mentioned the time constraints of ARPA funds.

Michael Grange, Infrastructure Funding Section Manager, clarified that the decision to lift the
moratorium was made with the expectation that applications would be prepared for the June
meeting. Consequently, Drinking Water SRF applications will be accepted for the June meeting
until May 8th, which aligns with the 60-day timeframe before the June meeting. This information
will be communicated to engineers, the Rural Water Users Association, and other relevant parties.

Eric Franson inquired about the potential backlog of projects due to the moratorium being lifted
and ongoing staff communications with entities that plan to request funds. He questioned whether
there might be more requests than funds available, resulting in a need to sift through them.
Michael explained that they anticipate a significant influx of projects. The strategy is to employ
the Project Priority list calculations and use it to prioritize projects to be presented before the
Board. Only those projects with sufficiently high scores will be brought before the Board. This
process will continue until they reach a point, considering a reserve fund, where they limit the
number of applications accepted based on Congressional allocations. This ensures that the funds
are not depleted.

Eric reiterated that the intention is for DDW staff to screen projects before they come to the Board
meeting, rather than having all projects presented directly to the Board. This screening process
helps manage the influx of projects and ensures that only prioritized ones reach the Board for
consideration.

Michael updated the Board on the remaining ARPA funds, indicating that approximately
$479,000 is still available in the emergency funds established with the Board's approval. These
funds need to be obligated with signed agreements with entities by December 31, 2024. As per the
agreement with the Legislature, these funds are intended for small disadvantaged rural
communities.

Page 5
Kristi Bell made a note that David Pitcher left the meeting at 1:25 PM.

Eric inquired about the Lead Service Line funds and expressed concern about the continued
accumulation, emphasizing that this funding shouldn't be used solely for inventories. He wanted to
know if there was a timeframe for spending this money.

Michael explained that, according to the legislation Bi-Partisan Infrastructure Law (BIL), the
funds are allocated until spent. Although there's a desire to spend it promptly, there isn't an exact
timeframe specified. Michael mentioned an application from Salt Lake City for a lead service line
replacement project, requesting $35-40 million. They are considering a programmatic/portfolio
finance option to utilize the funds over a 5-year period. This application will likely be presented to
the Board at the February 29th meeting, potentially allocating funds from FY22 to FY24 under the
BIL.

Michael emphasized the need to reconstitute the Financial Assistance Committee (FAC). With
David Pitcher's retirement, the committee seeks a fourth member from the Board to volunteer. The
FAC meets 3-4 weeks before the Drinking Water Board meeting to review projects, follows staff
recommendations, and decides whether to table, request more information, or pass a project to the
Board without a recommendation. Currently, Eric Franson, Jeff Coombs, and Justin Maughan are
on the FAC. The next meeting is scheduled for February 7, 2024, and will discuss the Salt Lake
City application.

Nathan Lunstad added that discussions with Dave Pitcher indicate he plans to attend the next
Board meeting and may still be available for the FAC meeting. Kristi Bell, the Chair, suggested
determining Dave Pitcher's availability for the last FAC meeting before his final Board meeting
and deciding on the FAC composition for the future afterward.

Eric Franson proposed adding a discussion topic for the next board meeting to determine the
needs of the Financial Assistance Committee.

10. Other

None.

11. Next Board Meeting

Date: February 29, 2024
Time: 9:00 AM
Place: Dixie Convention Center
1835 S Convention Center Dr,
St. George, UT 84790

12. Adjourn

● Eric Franson moved to adjourn the meeting. Justin Maughan seconded. The motion was
carried unanimously by the Board.
Agenda Item
5(D)
Board Report As of February 15, 2024
PWS ID PWS Name PWS Type Pop Served IPS Pts Rating Rating Date
Corrective Action Systems
Not Approved Systems
UTAH13001 ALTON TOWN WATER SYSTEM Community 136 230 Correcve Acon 6/24/2021
UTAH06008 WEBER BASIN JOB CORPS Community 230 75 Correcve Acon 5/9/2023
UTAH22114 BULL MOOSE WATERWORKS Transient Non-Community 136 330 Correcve Acon 1/2/2024
UTAH29092 COLE CANYON WATER COMPANY Community 39 45 Correcve Acon 10/17/2023
UTAH26033 DEER CREEK PARK Transient Non-Community 150 190 Correcve Acon 7/8/2020
UTAH14051 DESERET - OASIS SSD Community 490 270 Correcve Acon 1/3/2024
UTAH02010 EAST GROUSE CREEK PIPELINE CO Community 70 135 Correcve Acon 9/9/2020
UTAH22003 ECHO MUTUAL WATER SYSTEM Community 70 115 Correcve Acon 2/24/2023
UTAH20056 ESCAPE RV RESORTS - MT PLEASANT Transient Non-Community 144 125 Correcve Acon 9/29/2023
UTAH29053 GREEN HILLS COUNTRY ESTATES Community 237 525 Correcve Acon 1/2/2024
UTAH14004 HINCKLEY TOWN WATER SYSTEM Community 675 290 Correcve Acon 1/10/2024
UTAH14013 HOLDEN TOWN WATER SYSTEM Community 475 45 Correcve Acon 2/1/2024
UTAH18055 MT HAVEN OWNERS ASSOCIATION Transient Non-Community 85 15 Correcve Acon 4/12/2023
UTAH08034 PACIFICORP HUNTINGTON PLANT Non-Transient 175 30 Correcve Acon 4/24/2023
UTAH23075 PENNEYS GRILL LLC Transient Non-Community 27 85 Correcve Acon 3/10/2023
UTAH27089 BIG PLAINS WATER SSD - CEDAR POINT Community 232 255 Correcve Acon 10/17/2023
UTAH17023 RENDEZVOUS BEACH Transient Non-Community 200 240 Correcve Acon 3/29/2023
UTAH07067 SOUTH DUCHESNE CULINARY WATER Community 286 175 Correcve Acon 5/25/2022
UTAH29046 VALLEY VIEW STAKE CAMP Transient Non-Community 300 0 Correcve Acon 7/20/2022
UTAH26059 WASATCH MOBILE HOME PARK Community 31 275 Correcve Acon 10/16/2020
UTAH17001 BRIDGERLAND WATER CO Community 240 0 Correcve Acon 2/22/2023
UTAH03002 AMALGA TOWN WATER SYSTEM Community 495 180 Not Approved 01/19/2024
UTAH24051 DESERT SAGE HOA Community 55 820 Not Approved 01/12/2022
UTAH11099 FOOTHILL WATER USERS ASSOCIATION Community 28 760 Not Approved 03/27/2023
UTAH25184 BATEMANS MOSIDA FARMS Community 90 975 Not Approved 10/30/2023
UTAH02078 M & J TRAILER HOME COMMUNITY Community 27 670 Not Approved 08/20/2018
UTAH15015 MOUNTAIN GREEN WATER ASSOCIATION Community 47 120 Not Approved 10/23/2023
UTAH29107 POLE PATCH WATER SYSTEM Community 68 180 Not Approved 10/23/2023
UTAH25077 RIVERBEND GROVE INC Transient Non-Community 25 215 Not Approved 02/10/2021
Agenda Item
6(A)
Rural Water Association Report
Presented to the Drinking Water Board
February 29, 2024
DRINKING WATER BOARD PACKET
Rural Water Association Report
Table of Contents
Terry Smith - Compliance Specialist – ............................................................................................... 2
Janell Braithwaite –Management Technician .................................................................................... 5
Curt Ludvigson – Management Technician .................................................................................... 10
Water is Life
Rural Water Association - DWB Report
Report Period: January, 2024
Terry Smith - Compliance Circuit Rider
Contract Goal Titles
Hours,
Current
Month
Contract
YTD Hours
Achieved
Contract
YTD Goal
Hours
Annual
Contract
Goals
Asset Management/Evaluation 0 0 7 80
Board/Council Training 0 0 2 26
Budget Planning/Evaluation 0 0 2 26
Capacity Development/Master Planning 0 0 5 64
Classroom Instruction/Training 34 34 4 48
Compliance/Rules Assistance 47 47 23 272
DDW Interaction/Meetings/Reports 11 11 4 48
Emergency Response 0 0 2 18
Energy Efficiency Study 0 0 1 12
Funding Procurement 0 0 2 24
O&M Training & Assistance 5 5 1 14
Off-Site Assistance 0 0 8 96
Ordinance, Resolutions, By-Laws Development 0 0 0 4
RWAU Conference 0 0 5 64
Training Received 0 0 3 36
Water Loss/Auditing 0 0 6 72
Water Rate Development/Analysis 0 0 3 32
Totals:97 97 78 936
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
As
s
e
t

M
a
n
a
g
e
…
Bo
a
r
d
/
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
…
Bu
d
g
e
t

P
l
a
n
n
i
…
Ca
p
a
c
i
t
y

D
e
v
…
Cla
s
s
r
o
o
m

I
n
s
…
Co
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
/
R
…
DD
W

I
n
t
e
r
a
c
t
i
…
Em
e
r
g
e
n
c
y

R
…
En
e
r
g
y

E
f
fic
i
e
…
Fu
n
d
i
n
g

P
r
o
c
…
O&
M

T
rai
n
i
n
g
…
Of
f-S
i
t
e

A
s
s
i
s
t
…
Or
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
,

R
e
…
RWAU

C
o
n
f
e
r
…
Trai
n
i
n
g

R
e
c
e
i
…
Wate
r

L
o
s
s
/
A
…
Wate
r

R
a
t
e

D
…
(hours worked in blue)
Program Hours Worked vs Goals to Date
Water is Life
Report Period: January, 2024
Notable Assistance & Work Performed
System Description:
ANGELL SPRINGS SSD Met with Shawn to instruct him on a hazard CC survey
ENOCH CITY Discussion with Hayden pertaining to failure to install treatement
MOUNT AIR SUB. (18134)Helping Freddie with a SOP for disinfection of lines/tanks
PEOA PIPELINE CO Discussion with Lloyd about operator cert - offer support, etc.
COVE SSD Assisting Randy with annual water usage report
HOLDEN TOWN Discussion with Rod about failed exam review policy & options
BRIAN HEAD TOWN Presenting - Preparing for Natural Disasters
BRIAN HEAD TOWN Presenting - Distribution Care and Maintenance
CENTRAL UT WCD-DUCH VLY Email explanation of the DRC rule to Mike and Jesse
MOUNT AIR SUB. (18134)Talked to Freddie about rule related to backup power for well
ENTERPRISE CITY Training - annual water usage report with Clint
PORTAGE TOWN Working on Portage Town assistance request
WASATCH WING/CLAY (25180)Working on DDW request for assistance - coodinating with Biz
MARYSVALE TOWN Proctor exam & training on altitude valve O&M
HARMONY FARMS WTR USRS Advisin Eric on potable water hauling and resources
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
0
10
20
30
40
50
ss
e
t

M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
/
E
…
Bo
a
r
d
/
C
o
u
n
c
i
l

T
rai
n
i
n
g
Bu
d
g
e
t

P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
/
E
v
a
l
…
Ca
p
a
c
i
t
y

D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
…
Cla
s
s
r
o
o
m

I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
/
…
Co
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
/
R
u
l
e
s

A
s
…
DD
W

I
n
t
e
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
/
M
e
e
t
i
…
Em
e
r
g
e
n
c
y

R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
En
e
r
g
y

E
f
fic
i
e
n
c
y

S
t
u
d
y
Fu
n
d
i
n
g

P
r
o
c
u
r
e
m
e
n
t
O&
M

T
rai
n
i
n
g

&

A
s
s
i
s
t
…
Of
f-S
i
t
e

A
s
s
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
Or
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
,

R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
…
RWAU

C
o
n
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
Trai
n
i
n
g

R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
Wate
r

L
o
s
s
/
A
u
d
i
t
i
n
g
Wate
r

R
a
t
e

D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
…
(hours worked in blue)
Hours Worked vs Goal for Month
Water is Life
Rural Water Association of Utah
Water System Assistance Report
Report Month:
Contract
Employee:
January
Terry Smith 47.5
Direct System Assistance Percentage:33%
1/5/2024 Coodinating date/time with Marie to proctor exams ST GEORGE CITY 1.00
1/5/2024 Working with Mike on disinfection violation, sent email to Jen FRUITLAND SSD 1.00
1/5/2024 Met with Shawn to instruct him on a hazard CC survey ANGELL SPRINGS SSD 1.50
1/5/2024 Discussion with Hayden pertaining to failure to install treatement ENOCH CITY 0.50
1/10/2024 Reaching out to Mr. Johnson to offer assistance BOULDER MTN GUEST RANCH 0.50
1/10/2024 Reaching out to Mr. Hill & Mr Ulanch to offer assistance - TC sample HIDDEN LAKE ASSOC 1.00
1/10/2024 Helping Freddie with a SOP for disinfection of lines/tanks MOUNT AIR SUB. (18134)1.00
1/10/2024 Proctor exam - Barry Marshell MINERSVILLE TOWN WATER 2.00
1/11/2024 Proctor exam - Patrick Warner KANE COUNTY WCD 2.25
1/11/2024 Discussion with Lloyd about operator cert - offer support, etc.PEOA PIPELINE CO 0.50
1/11/2024 Assisting Randy with annual water usage report COVE SSD 0.50
1/12/2024 Proctor exam WASHINGTON CITY 2.50
1/12/2024 Discussion with Rod about failed exam review policy & options HOLDEN TOWN 0.50
1/16/2024 Presenting - Preparing for Natural Disasters BRIAN HEAD TOWN 2.00
1/16/2024 Presenting - Distribution Care and Maintenance BRIAN HEAD TOWN 1.50
1/17/2024 Email explanation of the DRC rule to Mike and Jesse CENTRAL UT WCD-DUCH VLY 1.00
1/17/2024 Helped Nathan with rule requiring respirator/chlorine. Sent email.MARYSVALE TOWN 1.00
1/17/2024 Talked to Freddie about rule related to backup power for well MOUNT AIR SUB. (18134)1.00
1/17/2024 Helped Terry with annual water report - how to calculate numbers MOUNTAIN VLY WTR (18162)1.00
1/19/2024 Proctor SS exam - Raymond Coombs PINE VALLEY MTN FARMS 2.75
1/19/2024 Training - annual water usage report with Clint ENTERPRISE CITY 0.50
1/22/2024 Meeting with Chad BEAVER CITY 1.50
1/23/2024 Proctor CC Admin exam - Travis Batty NEW HARMONY TOWN 2.50
1/25/2024 Helping Marty get registered to take CC Admin exam ANGELL SPRINGS SSD 0.50
1/25/2024 Proctoring - Tyler Mendenhall, CC Admin HATCH TOWN 3.00
1/25/2024 Advising Matt concerning Cross Connection rules FILLMORE CITY 0.50
1/25/2024 Working on Portage Town assistance request PORTAGE TOWN 1.00
1/26/2024 Proctoring exams ST GEORGE CITY 3.75
1/26/2024 Contacting Matt to set up date/time for exam CEDAR CITY 0.50
1/29/2024 Working on DDW request for assistance - coodinating with Biz WASATCH WING/CLAY (25180)1.00
1/29/2024 Exam review preparation FREDONIA 2.00
1/31/2024 Proctor exam & training on altitude valve O&M MARYSVALE TOWN 5.25
1/31/2024 Advisin Eric on potable water hauling and resources HARMONY FARMS WTR USRS 0.50
Water is Life
Rural Water Association - DWB Report
Report Period: January, 2024
Janell Braithwaite - Management Technician
Contract Goal Titles
Hours,
Current
Month
Contract
YTD Hours
Achieved
Contract
YTD Goal
Hours
Annual
Contract
Goals
Capacity Development/Master Planning 6 6 5 64
Water Rate Development & Fee Analysis 7 7 7 87
Asset Management/Evaluation 2 2 7 80
Budget Planning/Evaluation 5 5 4 48
RWAU Conference 8 8 5 64
Training Received 25 25 5 56
Classroom Instruction/Training 6 6 3 36
DDW Interaction/Meetings/Reports 4 4 4 48
Funding Procurement 4 4 2 24
Water Loss/Auditing 1 1 6 72
Locating and Securing Engineering 0 0 1 10
Ordinance, Resolution, By-Law Development 5 5 0 4
Energy Efficiency Study 0 0 1 12
Board/Council Training 2 2 2 26
Emergency Response 1 1 1 12
Onsite O&M Training 5 5 2 20
Compliance/Rules Assistance, CCC, Water Monitor 23 23 15 185
Totals:100 100 71 848
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
Ca
p
a
c
i
t
y

D
e
v
…
Wate
r

R
a
t
e

D
…
As
s
e
t

M
a
n
a
g
e
…
Bu
d
g
e
t

P
l
a
n
n
i
…
RWAU

C
o
n
f
e
r
…
Trai
n
i
n
g

R
e
c
e
i
…
Cla
s
s
r
o
o
m

I
n
s
…
DD
W

I
n
t
e
r
a
c
t
i
…
Fu
n
d
i
n
g

P
r
o
c
…
Wate
r

L
o
s
s
/
A
…
Lo
c
a
t
i
n
g

a
n
d
…
Or
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
,

R
e
…
En
e
r
g
y

E
f
fic
i
e
…
Bo
a
r
d
/
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
…
Em
e
r
g
e
n
c
y

R
…
On
s
i
t
e

O
&
M

T
…
Co
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
/
R
…
(hours worked in blue)
Program Hours Worked vs Goals to Date
Water is Life
Report Period: January, 2024
Notable Assistance & Work Performed
System Description:
TRAPPERS CROSSING Prepare for and meet online w/Melissa & Brenda, Board members
BLANDING CITY
Attend online DWB mtg.
WALES TOWN Attend Wales council meeting, discuss rates, capacity development
FREMONT WATER WORKS Call from Kaitlyn re: ceus for water op, CCC and conference help
ANGELL SPRINGS SSD Call from Karen Blankenship re: funding, RFP for project
GREEN RIVER CITY Contacted by Tyler re: impact fees, rules, ordinance, send Tyler info
SPRINGVILLE CITY Meet w/Tyson to review rate study for any corrections, budget, etc.
BIG WATER MUNICIPAL Call from Peggy re: SSD questions on public hearings and noticing
Meet w/Curt and Michael Grange to review DWB funding
DANIEL DOMESTIC WATER
STORM HAVEN WATER CO
MAYFIELD TOWN Call from Jake re: LCRR questions, info given
GENOLA TOWN Meet w/Lucinda re: rates and budget, need rates updated for bond
SUMMIT CO SERV AREA #3 Prepare for and meet online w/Vincent, Chris Bullock & John O'Brian
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Meet online w/Trent, City Manager, re: budget and rates, send info ne
Meet w/Kim and Erik to review rate study and make needed correction
Meet w/Kim and Erik to review rate study and make needed correction
0
5
10
15
20
25
pa
c
i
t
y

D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
…
Wate
r

R
a
t
e

D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
…
As
s
e
t

M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
/
E
…
Bu
d
g
e
t

P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
/
E
v
a
l
…
RWAU

C
o
n
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
Trai
n
i
n
g

R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
Cla
s
s
r
o
o
m

I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
/
…
DD
W

I
n
t
e
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
/
M
e
e
t
i
…
Fu
n
d
i
n
g

P
r
o
c
u
r
e
m
e
n
t
Wate
r

L
o
s
s
/
A
u
d
i
t
i
n
g
Lo
c
a
t
i
n
g

a
n
d

S
e
c
u
r
i
n
g
…
Or
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
,

R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
…
En
e
r
g
y

E
f
fic
i
e
n
c
y

S
t
u
d
y
Bo
a
r
d
/
C
o
u
n
c
i
l

T
rai
n
i
n
g
Em
e
r
g
e
n
c
y

R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
On
s
i
t
e

O
&
M

T
rai
n
i
n
g
Co
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
/
R
u
l
e
s

A
s
…
(hours worked in blue)
Hours Worked vs Goal for Month
Water is Life
Rural Water Association of Utah
Water System Assistance Report
Report Month:
Contract
Employee:
January
Janell Braithwaite 98.75
Direct System Assistance Percentage:61%
1/2/2024
Finish Daniel rate study as far as I can until I get more
information DANIEL DOMESTIC WATER 1.50
1/2/2024
Finish Storm Haven rate study as far as I can until
more info received STORM HAVEN WATER CO 2.00
1/2/2024 Contacted by Melissa re: rate study, set up meeting TRAPPERS CROSSING 0.50
1/2/2024
Contacted by Marlena, Recorder, to get water rate
study, info sent MANILA TOWN 0.50
1/2/2024 Call Helper re: water rate study requested HELPER CITY 0.25
1/2/2024
Call Wes re: water rate study requested, info sent of
what is needed JOHNSON WATER DIST 0.25
1/2/2024
Call from Delora, council member re: cross
connection program LAKETOWN CITY 0.50
1/2/2024 Received final info needed-work on rate study DANIEL DOMESTIC WATER 1.75
1/3/2024 Received final info needed-work on rate study STORM HAVEN WATER CO 2.00
1/3/2024 Work on Springville water rate study SPRINGVILLE CITY 3.00
1/4/2024 Contact Melissa to reschedule meeting TRAPPERS CROSSING 0.25
1/4/2024
Prepare for and meet online w/Melissa & Brenda,
Board members TRAPPERS CROSSING 2.25
1/4/2024 Contacted by Jordon re: taking op cert exam FAYETTE TOWN 0.25
1/4/2024 Work on rate study for Springville SPRINGVILLE CITY 1.75
1/4/2024
Meet online w/Trent, City Manager, re: budget and
rates, send info needed BLANDING CITY 1.25
1/4/2024 Work on rate study for Springville SPRINGVILLE CITY 0.75
1/5/2024
Review billing info received from Janet in Springville
for wrs SPRINGVILLE CITY 0.25
1/5/2024 Contacted by Karen re: funding application HURRICANE CITY 0.50
1/5/2024 Work on rate study for Springville SPRINGVILLE CITY 3.00
1/5/2024 Work on rate study for Springville HURRICANE CITY 3.75
1/8/2024 Work on Springville water rate study SPRINGVILLE CITY 1.75
1/8/2024 Work on Springville water rate study SPRINGVILLE CITY 3.75
1/8/2024
Work on info for Wales council meeting tomorrow
night WALES TOWN 0.25
1/9/2024 Review Rule R309 for Wales mtg. tonight WALES TOWN 2.25
1/9/2024 Call from Curt re: funding available from DWB MANDERFIELD CUL WTR 0.50
1/9/2024 Call Mike D. and Justin Atkinson re: Wales new well WALES TOWN 0.50
1/9/2024 Work on rate study for Springville SPRINGVILLE CITY 2.25
1/9/2024
Attend Wales council meeting, discuss rates, capacity
development WALES TOWN 1.50
1/10/2024 Work on rate study for Springville SPRINGVILLE CITY 2.25
1/10/2024 Call from Mike re: rate study for Hanna HANNA WTR/SWR DIST 0.25
1/10/2024 Work on rate study for Springville SPRINGVILLE CITY 2.75
1/11/2024 Work on rate study for Springville SPRINGVILLE CITY 3.75
1/11/2024 Work on rate study for Springville SPRINGVILLE CITY 1.75
1/11/2024
Call from Kaitlyn re: ceus for water op, CCC and
conference help FREMONT WATER WORKS 0.25
1/11/2024 Work on rate study for Springville SPRINGVILLE CITY 0.75
Water is Life
1/12/2024 Work on rate study for Springville SPRINGVILLE CITY 4.00
1/12/2024 Work on rate study for Springville SPRINGVILLE CITY 2.50
1/12/2024
Call from Karen Blankenship re: funding, RFP for
project ANGELL SPRINGS SSD 0.50
1/12/2024 Work on rate study for Springville SPRINGVILLE CITY 1.25
1/16/2024
Call from Kaitlyn re: how to renew CCC administrator,
sent link FREMONT WATER WORKS 0.25
1/16/2024
Call from Curt re: rate study for Henrieville, resent to
Curt and Marie HENRIEVILLE TOWN 0.25
1/16/2024 Need more info from Janet for rate study, sent request SPRINGVILLE CITY 0.25
1/16/2024 Work on Daniel water rate study DANIEL DOMESTIC WATER 1.00
1/18/2024 Call Mike D. re: Mountain Regional funding progress MOUNTAIN REGNL WTR SSD 0.25
1/18/2024 Work on Springville rate study, set up mtg. w/system SPRINGVILLE CITY 3.00
1/19/2024 Call from Mayor Bruce re: funding, income survey HONEYVILLE CITY 0.50
1/19/2024
Work on Springville's rate study, call Tiffany to set up
meeting SPRINGVILLE CITY 1.50
1/19/2024
Contacted by Tyler re: impact fees, rules, ordinance,
send Tyler info GREEN RIVER CITY 1.25
1/19/2024
Contact Janet, need more info for usage, she will
work on, rate study SPRINGVILLE CITY 2.50
1/22/2024 Work on updated info for water rate study SPRINGVILLE CITY 2.25
1/22/2024 Work on updated info for water rate study SPRINGVILLE CITY 2.00
1/22/2024
Work on updated info for rate study, meeting
tomorrow morning SPRINGVILLE CITY 1.25
1/23/2024
Meet w/Tyson to review rate study for any corrections,
budget, etc.SPRINGVILLE CITY 2.25
1/23/2024
Call from Peggy re: SSD questions on public hearings
and noticing BIG WATER MUNICIPAL 0.50
1/23/2024 Work on updating rate study for meeting tonight STORM HAVEN WATER CO 0.75
1/23/2024
Call from Scott A. re: emergency funding possibility,
will talk to M.Grange GARLAND CITY 0.25
1/23/2024 Work on SSD information for Katie BIG WATER MUNICIPAL 0.50
1/23/2024
Meet w/Kim and Erik to review rate study and make
needed corrections DANIEL DOMESTIC WATER 0.75
1/23/2024
Meet w/Kim and Erik to review rate study and make
needed corrections STORM HAVEN WATER CO 0.75
1/24/2024 Work on updating Storm Haven rate study STORM HAVEN WATER CO 0.25
1/24/2024
Call from Scott A. re: funding info from Michael
Grange, DDW 0.25
1/24/2024
Called Mike Davis-needed disadvantaged/population
info, sent him MOUNTAIN REGNL WTR SSD 0.25
1/24/2024 Call Peggy and Curt re: SSD meeting/compliance info BIG WATER MUNICIPAL 0.50
1/24/2024 Call from Jake re: LCRR questions, info given MAYFIELD TOWN 0.25
1/24/2024 Work on updating Storm Haven rate study STORM HAVEN WATER CO 0.50
1/24/2024
Meet w/Lucinda re: rates and budget, need rates
updated for bond GENOLA TOWN 1.00
1/25/2024 Work on updating Daniel rate study DANIEL DOMESTIC WATER 1.25
1/25/2024 Discuss ARPA funding w/Tyler, projects needed GREEN RIVER CITY 0.50
1/25/2024 Finish updates to rate study DANIEL DOMESTIC WATER 1.00
1/26/2024 Call Jake N., water op, back re: LCRR info requested MAYFIELD TOWN 0.25
1/26/2024
Work on funding info for Vincent, new well/tank
project SUMMIT CO SERV AREA #3 1.00
1/26/2024
Work on funding info for Vincent, new well/tank
project SUMMIT CO SERV AREA #3 0.75
1/26/2024 Call Dalton B. re: funding info for new tank MANDERFIELD CUL WTR 0.50
BIG PLAINS/APPLE VLY (27069)
Water is Life
1/26/2024 Call from Mike Davis re: update on Daniel visit DANIEL DOMESTIC WATER 0.25
1/29/2024
Contact Helper re: rate study requested, not in a big
hurry, Brittany HELPER CITY 0.25
1/29/2024
Call from Shilo re: rate study requested, info sent to
get started FRUITLAND SSD 0.50
1/29/2024
Reach out to Scofield for rate study as requested by
USDA SCOFIELD TOWN 0.25
1/29/2024 Set up mtg. w/Vincent for tomorrow SUMMIT CO SERV AREA #3 0.25
1/29/2024 Review more funding for Summit #3 mtg. tomorrow SUMMIT CO SERV AREA #3 0.25
1/29/2024
Send Scott A. info from rate study done for system he
may work with LAKE ROCKPORT EST 0.25
1/29/2024
Contact Wendi re: update on rate study that was
requested per: Mike HANNA WTR/SWR DIST 0.25
1/30/2024
Prepare for and meet online w/Vincent, Chris Bullock
& John O'Brian SUMMIT CO SERV AREA #3 2.50
1/30/2024 Contacted by Jennie re: water op cert proctoring CLEARFIELD CITY 0.25
1/30/2024
Contacted by Mayor Meli re: funding acquired & RFP
needed STOCKTON TOWN 0.25
1/30/2024
Read loan docs sent by Mayor Meli, call from Mayor
re: RFP STOCKTON TOWN 2.00
1/30/2024 Call Curt re: RFP and grant for Stockton STOCKTON TOWN 0.25
1/30/2024 Review project info sent by Mayor Meli STOCKTON TOWN 1.25
Water is Life
Rural Water Association - DWB Report
Report Period: January, 2024
Curt Ludvigson - Development Specialist
Contract Goal Titles
Hours,
Current
Month
YTD Goal
Hours
Achieved
YTD Goal
Hours
Annual
Program
Goals
Agency Meetings 4 4 1 10
Aging Infrastructure Planning 2 2 1 10
Boards/Councils 12 12 5 64
Capacity Development Planning 5 5 2 24
Classroom Training 2 2 6 72
Compliance (Capacity Development)0 0 5 60
County Plannners 4 4 5 56
DDW & DE 5 5 6 71
DDW Interaction/Meetings 2 2 5 60
Finance (Capacity Development)31 31 23 272
Health Departments 7 7 5 64
HR/Cust Service (Capacity Development)2 2 3 30
Long Range Planning 0 0 3 36
Planning/Assets (Capacity Development)5 5 20 240
PWS Definition Training 0 0 0 4
Rules/Policies (Capacity Development)31 31 5 60
RWAU Conferences 0 0 3 36
Training Received 0 0 2 24
Totals:111 111 99 1,193
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
Ag
e
n
c
y

M
e
e
t
i
…
Ag
i
n
g

I
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
…
Bo
a
r
d
s
/
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
s
Ca
p
a
c
i
t
y

D
e
v
…
Cla
s
s
r
o
o
m

T
r…
Co
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e

(
…
Co
u
n
t
y

P
l
a
n
n
…
DD
W

&

D
E
DD
W

I
n
t
e
r
a
c
t
i
…
Fin
a
n
c
e

(
C
a
p
…
He
a
l
t
h

D
e
p
a
r
t
…
HR
/
C
u
s
t

S
e
r
v
i
…
Lo
n
g

R
a
n
g
e

P
…
Pla
n
n
i
n
g
/
A
s
s
e
…
PW
S

D
e
f
i
n
i
t
i
o
…
Ru
l
e
s
/
P
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
…
RWAU

C
o
n
f
e
r
…
Trai
n
i
n
g

R
e
c
e
i
…
(hours worked in blue)
Program Hours Worked vs Goals to Date
Water is Life
Report Period: January, 2024
Notable Assistance & Work Performed
System Description:
PIUTE-SEVIER/DEER CR WTR Working on By-Laws for Piute/Sevier Deer Creek
LOA WATERWORKS
BICKNELL TOWN
Bicknell Bottoms Proctor a test for Riley Taylor from Bicknell Bottoms
BIG WATER MUNICIPAL Reviewing Ordinances for Big Water Town
MYTON CITY I met with Myton City and discussed putting in new meters
JOHNSON WATER DIST
TROPIC TOWN
HENRIEVILLE TOWN
MARYSVALE TOWN
ELWOOD TOWN Working on a rate study for Elwood
HATCH TOWN Continued working on rate study for Hatch Town
FAIRVIEW CITY
EPHRAIM CITY
DESERET OASIS SSD
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
I met with the Town Clerk and Treasurer of Loa Town and discussed O
I met with Scott Woolsey from Bicknell Town and discussed the needs
I met with the New Manager of Johnson Water and discussed system
I met with the Mayor, Clerk and Operator of TRopic and took pictures
I met with the Henrieville Town Clerk and went over their budget. I've
I met with the Marysvale Town Council and discussed projects they ar
Attended Fairview City Council Meeting and discussed the funding op
I met with the Ephraim City Manager and discussed ongoing projects
I met with the Secretary and President of Deseret Oasis and went thro
0
10
20
30
40
Ag
e
n
c
y

M
e
e
t
i
n
g
s
Ag
i
n
g

I
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
…
Bo
a
r
d
s
/
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
s
Ca
p
a
c
i
t
y

D
e
v
e
l
o
p
…
Cla
s
s
r
o
o
m

T
rai
n
i
n
g
Co
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e

(
C
a
p
a
…
Co
u
n
t
y

P
l
a
n
n
n
e
r
s
DD
W

&

D
E
DD
W

I
n
t
e
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
/
M
…
Fin
a
n
c
e

(
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
…
He
a
l
t
h

D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
s
HR
/
C
u
s
t

S
e
r
v
i
c
e

(
…
Lo
n
g

R
a
n
g
e

P
l
a
n
n
i
…
Pla
n
n
i
n
g
/
A
s
s
e
t
s

(
C
…
PW
S

D
e
f
i
n
i
t
i
o
n

T
ra…
Ru
l
e
s
/
P
o
l
i
c
i
e
s

(
C
a
…
RWAU

C
o
n
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
Trai
n
i
n
g

R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
(hours worked in blue)
Hours Worked vs Goal for Month
Water is Life
Rural Water Association of Utah
Water System Assistance Report
Report Month:
Contract
Employee:
January
Curt Ludvigson 113
Direct System Assistance Percentage:67%
1/2/2024 Working on By-Laws for Piute/Sevier Deer Creek PIUTE-SEVIER/DEER CR WTR 4.00
1/3/2024
Meeting with John Chartier discussing the issues of
Puite/Sevier Deer Creek and other systems District Engineers 2.50
1/3/2024
I met with the Annbella Town Clerk and discussed
their rates and budget. They asked me to review this
each year for them ANNABELLA 1.50
1/3/2024
I met with the Town Clerk of Central Valley Town and
discussed their rates. They will have us do a rate
study for them soon.Central Valley Town 1.25
1/3/2024
I met with the Mayor of Redmond and discussed a
project they are considering and how they would pay
for it REDMOND TOWN 1.25
1/4/2024
I met with the Town Clerk and Treasurer of Loa Town
and discussed Ordinance and Resolution updates
they need to have done. We reviewed some of them
and I made some recommendations. I will prepare a
Land Use Ordinance for them for dealing with
subdividers, etc.LOA WATERWORKS 2.00
1/4/2024
I met with Scott Woolsey from Bicknell Town and
discussed the needs of their system. Things are
going pretty good for now, but he's worrying about the
lack of snow in the mountains.BICKNELL TOWN 1.25
1/4/2024 Proctor a test for Riley Taylor from Bicknell Bottoms Bicknell Bottoms 3.00
1/5/2024
Phone Call with Big Water Town discussing their
Agreements with the Big Water SSD BIG WATER MUNICIPAL 1.00
1/5/2024 Reviewing Ordinances for Big Water Town BIG WATER MUNICIPAL 4.00
1/8/2024
I met with Clyde Watkins of the Duchesne County
WCD and discussed the growth issues he is dealing
with and also the difficulty of dealing with the Tribe Duchesne County WCD 1.50
1/9/2024
I met with Myton City and discussed putting in new
meters MYTON CITY 2.00
1/9/2024
I met with the New Manager of Johnson Water and
discussed system expansion that is being considered,
and also discussed conflicts with some of the Board
Members JOHNSON WATER DIST 1.75
1/10/2024
I met with the Mayor and Town clerk of TAbiona and
discussed issues they are having in finishing up their
project because of the Tribe now allowing them to
cross Tribal ground with the pipeline TABIONA TOWN 2.25
1/10/2024
I met with the Wasatch County Health Department
and discussed some updates they want to do with
their subdivision Ordinance, and I will work on that Wasatch Health Dept.1.50
1/10/2024
I met with the Town Council in a work meeting
discussing their development Ordinances and
updates that need to be made. They are starting to
have developers wanting to come into the area and
they don't know how to deal with it.WALLSBURG TOWN 1.50
1/11/2024 Working on Development Ordinance for WAllsburg WALLSBURG TOWN 4.00
1/11/2024
I met with the Genola Town Clerk and reviewed thier
budget and rates GENOLA TOWN 2.25
Water is Life
1/12/2024 Working on developing an Ordinance for Wallsburg WALLSBURG TOWN 4.00
1/12/2024
Working on an Ordinance update for Wasatch County
Health Dept Wasatch Health Dept.4.00
1/16/2024
I met with the Mayor, Clerk and Operator of TRopic
and took pictures for our awards at the Conference.
We also discussed their budget and rates TROPIC TOWN 2.00
1/16/2024
I met with the Henrieville Town Clerk and went over
their budget. I've been working on thier rates, but I
needed more information and clarification as to their
finances HENRIEVILLE TOWN 1.75
1/16/2024
I met with the Hatch Town Clerk and got information I
need in order to do a rate study for the town HATCH TOWN 1.50
1/17/2024
I met with the City Manager of Panguitch and
discussed more projects they want to do. We
discussed funding options and their MAGI PANGUITCH CITY 1.75
1/17/2024
I met with the Board of Puite/Sevier Deer Creek for a
very long meeting. We went over all the changes
being proposed to their By-Laws. We discussed the
possiblility of expansion of the system and we
discussed issues of conflict between Board members PIUTE-SEVIER/DEER CR WTR 4.00
1/17/2024
I met with the Marysvale Town Council and discussed
projects they are planning, engineering, funding, and
their budget and rates MARYSVALE TOWN 2.50
1/18/2024
Meeting with the Juab County Economic
Development Director. We toured the areas in the
County where significant development is taking place
and discussed plans they have for future development
and how I might be able to assist them with
Ordinances and securing funding.3.50
1/18/2024
I met with the Levan Public Works Director and
discussed the project they are working on and a few
snags they have run into LEVAN TOWN 1.25
1/19/2024 Working on a rate study for Elwood ELWOOD TOWN 4.00
1/19/2024 Working on a rate study for Henrieville HENRIEVILLE TOWN 4.00
1/22/2024 Working on rate study for Hatch HATCH TOWN 2.00
1/22/2024 Continued working on rate study for Hatch Town HATCH TOWN 4.25
1/23/2024
I met with the President of the Board of Covered
Bridge and discussed Personel Policies COVERED BRIDGE CANYON 2.50
1/24/2024
I met with the Summit County Health Department and
discussed the development that is going on there and
issues they have with ongoing enforcement Summit County Health Dept 1.75
1/24/2024
I met with the Secretary of Wanship Water and went
over their budget with her and discussed the need for
a rate study and increase.WANSHIP MUTUAL WTR CO 2.00
1/24/2024
I met with the City recorder of Oakley and discussed
their budget and loan payments from their most
recent project OAKLEY CITY 1.25
1/24/2024
I met with the City Engineer and the City Recorder
and discussed a project they are contimplating and
the funding that may be available KAMAS CITY 1.25
1/25/2024
I met with the City Recorder of Eureka and went over
their budget and rates. They need to have a rate
study done and I will see if the Council is agreeable EUREKA CITY 2.00
1/25/2024
I met with the Division of Public Utilities and
discussed the issues in Puite/Sevier Deer Creek and
what jurisdiction the DPU has over them. We
discussed their need to increase rates and fees and
getting propared for the area to develop and expand.2.50
Juab County Planning Commissio
Division of Public Utilities (Public
Water is Life
1/25/2024
Attended Fairview City Council Meeting and
discussed the funding options for the spring
redevelopment project that they need to do.FAIRVIEW CITY 1.75
1/29/2024 Working on reviewing Eureka's budget EUREKA CITY 2.50
1/29/2024
Meeting with Karl Larsen of USDA discussing the
upcoming conference and also the status of their
funding availability USDA RURAL DEVELOPMENT 1.50
1/29/2024
I met with the Ephraim City Manager and discussed
ongoing projects they are doing and the massive
growth they are experiencing.EPHRAIM CITY 1.50
1/30/2024
I met with the Secretary and President of Deseret
Oasis and went through boxes of paperwork and
meeting minutes trying to figure out what they're latest
policies acutally are. I will try to help them write some
new By-Laws based on what we found.DESERET OASIS SSD 4.00
1/30/2024
I met with the Mayor of Scipio and discussed a project
they are working on and we discussed engineering
issues they are having.SCIPIO TOWN 1.50
1/31/2024 Working on By-Laws for Deseret Oasis DESERET OASIS SSD 4.00
1/31/2024 Continued working on By-Laws for Deseret Oasis DESERET OASIS SSD 4.00
Agenda Item
7(A)
DRINKING WATER BOARD PACKET
(Request to Begin Rulemaking)

R309-515 Facility Design and Operation: Source Development
Presented to the Drinking Water Board
February 29, 2024

PROPOSAL:
The Division of Drinking Water proposes to make nonsubstantive changes to R309-515-5(5)(f),
R309-515-6(13), and R309-515-6(13)(e) to delete references to parts of R309-540, which will no
longer be accurate when R309-540 is revised by a separate rulemaking proposal.

The Division proposes to make substantive changes to R309-515-6(4) to delete special
construction requirements for sewer mains, laterals, and maintenance holes located in Source
Protection Zone 2.

HISTORY/CONTEXT:
The proposed amendment to R309-515-6(4) deletes special construction requirements for sewer
mains, laterals, and maintenance holes located in Source Protection Zone 2 but retains them for
Source Protection Zone 1. The current requirements can rarely be met, and the division
frequently must issue exceptions to the rule requirements, which the division believes are
unnecessary to provide protection of groundwater sources in Zone 2.

The proposed amendment to R309-515-6(4) also clarifies that the special construction
requirements apply to sewer mains and laterals carrying wastewater from a building to a public
sewer, septic system, or wastewater dispersal system and clarifies that the special construction
requirements don’t apply to floor drains.

The proposed amendment deletes Subsection R309-515-6(4)(h), which currently requires, as a
special construction requirement, an impermeable cutoff wall along the upgradient edge of sewer
trenches in Source Protection Zone 1 for protected aquifers and in Source Protection Zone 2 for
unprotected aquifers. The requirement would no longer apply to sewer lines and laterals in Zone
2 because all special construction requirements are being deleted. The division also believes this
requirement is overly restrictive and unnecessary for the protection of groundwater sources in
Zone 1.

The proposed rule has been distributed within the division and to public water systems,
consultants, and others for review. The division has considered all comments received and
revised the rule as necessary. The proposed rule has also been pre-filed with the Office of
Administrative Rules for review as required by Executive Order 2021-12, Establishing Effective
Oversight Over State Agency Rulemaking, issued by Governor Cox on May 6, 2021.

DIVISION STAFF/DIRECTOR RECOMMENDATION:
The Division recommends that the Drinking Water Board approve filing the amendment to
R309-515-5 and -6 with the Office of Administrative Rules (OAR) to begin the rulemaking
process and making the reenacted rule effective on May 8, 2024, if no comments are received
during the comment period. The Division plans to make other nonsubstantive changes in the
existing rule language throughout the rule to conform the Rulewriting Manual for Utah. The
Division will share the final version of the rule to the Board on June 25, 2024 when the Division
returns to request the Board approval to adopt the rule if no comments are received during the
public comment period.

IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
Request Drinking Water Board Approval to File Proposed Rule: 02/29/2024
Deadline to File Proposed Rule with OAR: 03/15/2024
Publication of Proposed Rule in Utah State Bulletin: 04/01/2024
End of 30-Day Comment Period: 05/01/2024
File Notice of Effective Date with OAR (if no comments received): 05/08/2024
Anticipated Effective Date of Proposed Rule (if no comments received): 05/08/2024
Return to Request Board Approval to Adopt Rule (if no comments received): 06/25/2024

COST ESTIMATE:
The Division anticipates that the proposed rule amendment will have no aggregate cost or
savings to the state budget, local governments, small businesses, non-small businesses, or other
persons.

The proposed rule amendment is expected to have no compliance costs for affected persons,
which are public water suppliers that plan to construct a groundwater source in which sewer lines
or laterals are present in Source Protection Zones 1 or 2, because the amendment does not
impose any new requirements.

R309. Environmental Quality, Drinking Water.
R309-515. Facility Design and Operation: Source Development.
R309-515-1. Purpose.
This rule specifies requirements for public drinking water sources. It is intended to be
applied in conjunction with R309-500 through R309-550. Collectively, these rules govern the
design, construction, operation and maintenance of public drinking water system facilities.
These rules are intended to assure that such facilities are reliably capable of supplying adequate
quantities of water that consistently meet applicable drinking water quality requirements and do
not pose a threat to general public health.

R309-515-2. Authority.
This rule is promulgated by the Drinking Water Board as authorized by Title 19,
Environmental Quality Code, Chapter 4, Safe Drinking Water Act, Subsection 104(1)(a)(ii) of
the Utah Code Annotated and in accordance with 63G-3 of the same, known as the
Administrative Rulemaking Act.

R309-515-3. Definitions.
Definitions for certain terms used in this rule are given in R309-110 but may be further
clarified herein.

R309-515-4. General.
(1) Issues to be Considered.
The selection, development, and operation of a public drinking water source must be
done in a manner that will protect public health and assure that all required water quality
standards, as described in R309-200, are met.
(2) Communication with the Division.
Because of the issues described above in (1), engineers are advised to work closely with
the Division to help assure that sources are properly sited, developed, and operated.
(3) Number of Sources and Quantity Requirements.
Community water systems serving more than 100 connections shall have a minimum of
two sources, except where served by a surface water treatment plant. For all systems, the total
developed source capacity shall equal or exceed the peak day demand of the system. Refer to
R309-510-7 of these rules for procedure to estimate the peak day demand.
(4) Quality Requirements.
In selecting a source of water for development, the designing engineer shall demonstrate
to the satisfaction of the Director that the source(s) selected for use in public water systems are
of satisfactory quality, or can be treated in a manner so that the quality requirements of R309-200
can be met.
(5) Initial Analyses.
All new drinking water sources, unless otherwise noted below, shall be analyzed for the
following:
(a) all the primary and secondary inorganic contaminants listed in R309-200, Table 200-
1 and Table 200-5 (excluding Asbestos unless it would be required by R309-205-5(2));
(b) Ammonia as N; Boron; Calcium; Copper; Lead; Magnesium; Potassium; Turbidity,
as NTU; Specific Conductivity at 25 degrees Celsius, micro mhos/cm; Bicarbonate; Carbon
Dioxide; Carbonate; Hydroxide; Phosphorous, Ortho as P; Silica, dissolved as SiO2; Surfactant
as MBAS; Total Hardness as CaCO3; and Alkalinity as CaCO3;
(c) pesticides, PCBs and SOCs as listed in R309-200-5(3)(a), Table 200-2 unless the
system is a transient non-community PWS or, if a community PWS or non-transient non-
community PWS, has received waivers in accordance with R309-205-6(1)(f). The following six
constituents have been excused from monitoring in the State by the EPA, dibromochloropropane,
ethylene dibromide, Diquat, Endothall, glyphosate and Dioxin;
(d) VOCs as listed in R309-200-5(3)(b), Table 200-3 unless the system is a transient non-
community PWS; and,
(e) radiologic chemicals as listed in R309-200-5(4) unless the system is a non-transient
non-community PWS or a transient non-community PWS.
All analyses shall be performed by a certified laboratory as required by R309-205-4
(Specially prepared sample bottles are required),
(6) Source Classification.
Subsection R309-505-7(1)(a)(i) provides information on the classification of water
sources. The Director shall classify all existing or new sources as either:
(a) surface water or ground water under direct influence of surface water which requires
conventional surface water treatment or an approved equivalent; or as,
(b) ground water not under the direct influence of surface water.
(7) Latitude and Longitude.
The latitude and longitude, to at least the nearest second, or the location by section,
township, range, and course and distance from an established outside section corner or quarter
corner of each point of diversion shall be submitted to the Director prior to source approval.

R309-515-5. Surface Water Sources.
(1) Definition.
A surface water source, as is defined in R309-110, shall include, but not be limited, to tributary
systems, drainage basins, natural lakes, artificial reservoirs, impoundments and springs or wells
that have been classified as being directly influenced by surface water. Surface water sources
will not be considered for culinary use unless they can be rendered acceptable by conventional
surface water treatment or other equivalent treatment techniques acceptable to the Director.
(2) Pre-design Submittal.
The following information must be submitted to the Director and approved in writing before
commencement of design of diversion structures and/or water treatment facilities:
(a) a copy of the chemical analyses required by R309-200 and described in R309-515-4(5)
above; and,
(b) a survey of the watershed tributary to the watercourse along which diversion structures are
proposed. The survey shall include, but not be limited to:
(i) determining possible future uses of impoundments or reservoirs;
(ii) the present stream classification by the Division of Water Quality, any obstacles to having
stream(s) reclassified 1C, and determining degree of watershed control by owner or other
agencies;
(iii) assessing degree of hazard to the supply by accidental spillage of materials that may be
toxic, harmful or detrimental to treatment processes;
(iv) obtaining samples over a sufficient period of time to assess the microbiological, physical,
chemical and radiological characteristics and variations of the water;
(v) assessing the capability of the proposed treatment process to reduce contaminants to
applicable standards; and,
(vi) consideration of currents, wind and ice conditions, and the effect of tributary streams at their
confluence.
(3) Pre-construction Submittal.
Following approval of a surface water source, the following additional information must be
submitted for review and approval prior to commencement of construction:
(a) acceptable evidence that the water system has a legal right to divert water for the proposed
uses from the proposed sources;
(b) minimum quantity that the surface water source is capable of producing (see R309-515-
5(4)(a) below); and
(c) complete plans and specifications and supporting documentation for the proposed treatment
facilities to ascertain compliance with R309-525 or R309-530.
(4) Quantity.
The quantity of water from surface sources shall:
(a) be assumed to be no greater than the low flow of a 25-year recurrence interval or the low
flow of record for these sources when 25 years of records are not available;
(b) meet or exceed the anticipated peak day demand for water as estimated in R309-510-7 and
provide a reasonable surplus for anticipated growth; and,
(c) be adequate to compensate for all losses such as silting, evaporation, seepage, and sludge
disposal, which would be anticipated in the normal operation of the treatment facility.
(5) Diversion Structures.
Design of intake structures shall provide for:
(a) withdrawal of water from more than one level if quality varies with depth;
(b) intake of lowest withdrawal elevation located at sufficient depth to be kept submerged at the
low water elevation of the reservoir;
(c) separate facilities for release of less desirable water held in storage;
(d) occasional cleaning of the inlet line;
(e) a diversion device capable of keeping large quantities of fish or debris from entering an
intake structure; and,
(f) suitable protection of pumps where used to transfer diverted water[ (refer to R309-540-5)].
(6) Impoundments.
The design of an impoundment reservoir shall provide for, where applicable:
(a) removal of brush and trees to the high water level;
(b) protection from floods during construction;
(c) abandonment of all wells, which may be inundated (refer to applicable requirements of the
Division of Water Rights); and,
(d) adequate precautions to limit nutrient loads.

R309-515-6. Ground Water - Wells.
(1) Required Treatment.
If properly developed, water from wells may be suitable for culinary use without
treatment. A determination concerning whether treatment may be required can only be made after
the source has been developed and evaluated.
(2) Standby Power.
Water suppliers shall assess the capability of their system in the event of a power outage.
If a community water system has no naturally flowing water sources such as springs or flowing
wells, one or more of the system's sources shall be equipped for operation during power outages.
In this event:
(a) to ensure continuous service when the primary power has been interrupted, a
redundant power supply shall be provided. A redundant power supply may include a transfer
switch for auxiliary power such as a generator or a power supply service with coverage from two
independent substations.
(b) when automatic pre-lubrication of pump bearings is necessary, and an auxiliary
power supply is provided, the pre-lubrication line shall be provided with a valved by-pass around
the automatic control, or the automatic control shall be wired to the emergency power source.
(3) The Utah Division of Water Rights.
The Utah Division of Water Rights (State Engineer's Office) regulates the drilling of
water wells. Before the drilling of a well commences, the well driller must receive a start card
from the State Engineer's Office. For public drinking water supply wells, the rules of R655-4
apply and shall be followed in addition to these rules.
(4) Source Protection.
Public drinking water systems are responsible for protecting their sources from
contamination. The selection of a well location shall only be made after consideration of the
requirements of Rule R309-600. Sources shall be located in an area that will minimize threats
from existing or potential sources of pollution.
[Generally, sewer lines may not be located within zone one and zone two of a public
drinking water system's source protection zones. However, if the following precautions are
taken, sewer lines may be permitted within a public drinking water system's source protection
zone one and zone two. Sewer lines shall meet the conditions identified in R309-600-13(3), and
shall be specially constructed as follows throughout zone one in aquifers classified as protected,
and zones one and two, if the aquifer is classified as unprotected]
(a) [Sewer lines shall be constructed to remain watertight. The lines shall be deflection-
tested in accordance with the Division of Water Quality Rule R317-3. The lines shall be video-
inspected for any defect following completion of construction and before being placed in service.
The sewer pipe material shall be:] A public water system shall not develop a new groundwater
source if existing sewer infrastructure, including sewer lines, sewer laterals, or sewer
maintenance holes, exist within the boundaries of source protection zone one. For purposes of
this section, floor drains are not considered to be applicable sewer infrastructure.
(b) The Director may approve, as a permit order under Section 19-1-301.5, new
groundwater sources if the conditions identified in Subsection R309-600-13(3) are met and each
applicable sewer infrastructure, carrying wastewater from a building or home to a public sewer
or an onsite wastewater system, located within source protection zone one is specially
constructed as follows:
(i) [high density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe with a PE3408 or PE4710 rating from the
Plastic Pipe Institute and have a Dimension Ratio (DR) of 17 or less, and all joints shall be
fusion-welded; or,] Sewer lines shall be constructed to remain watertight. The lines shall be
deflection-tested in accordance with Rule R317-3. The lines shall be video-inspected for any
defect after completion of construction and before being placed in service. The sewer pipe
material shall be:
(A) high density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe with a PE3408 or PE4710 rating from the
Plastic Pipe Institute and have a Standard Dimension Ratio (SDR) of 17 or less, and each joint
shall be fusion-welded; or,
[(ii)] (B) polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe meeting AWWA Specification C900 or C905
and have a DR of 18 or less. PVC pipe shall be either restrained gasketed joints or shall be
fusion-welded. Solvent cement joints shall not be acceptable. The PVC pipe shall be clearly
identified when installed, by marking tape or other means as a sanitary sewer line; or,
[(iii)] (C) ductile iron pipe with ceramic epoxy lining, polyethylene encasement,
restrained joints, and a minimum pressure class of 200.
[(b)] (ii) Procedures for leakage tests shall be [specified] named and comply with
[Division of Water Quality] Rule R317-3.
[(c)] (iii) Lateral to [main] sewer line connection shall be fusion-welded, shop-
fabricated, or saddled with a mechanical clamping watertight device designed for the specific
pipe.
[(d)] (iiii) Inlet and outlet sewer pipes shall be joined to a [manhole] maintenance hole
with a gasketed flexible watertight connection.
[(e)] (v) The sewer pipe shall be laid with no greater than 2% [percent] deflection at any
joint.
[(f)] (vi) Backfill shall be compacted to not less than 95% [percent] of maximum
laboratory density as determined in accordance with ASTM Standard D-690.
[(g)] (vii) Sewer [manholes] maintenance hole shall meet the [following] Subsections
R309-515-6(4)(b)(vii)(A) through (C) requirements.
[(i)] (A) The [manholes] maintenance hole shall be constructed of reinforced concrete[.],
HDPE, or approved equivalent.
[(ii)] (B) [Manhole] Maintenance hole base and walls, up to a point at least 12 inches
above the top of the upper most sewer pipe entering the [manhole] maintenance hole, shall be
fabricated in a single concrete pour without joints.
[(iii)] (C) The [manholes] maintenance hole shall be air pressure tested after installation.
(h) In unprotected aquifers, an impermeable cutoff wall shall be constructed in all sewer
trenches on the up-gradient edge of zone two. In protected aquifers, an impermeable cutoff wall
shall be constructed in all sewer trenches on the up-gradient edge of zone one.
(5) Outline of Well Approval Process.
(a) Well drilling shall not commence until both of the following items are submitted and
receive a favorable review:
(i) a Preliminary Evaluation Report on source protection issues as required by R309-600-
13, and
(ii) engineering plans and specifications governing the well drilling, prepared by a
licensed well driller holding a current Utah Well Drillers License or prepared, signed, and
stamped by a licensed professional engineer or professional geologist licensed to practice in
Utah.
(b) Inspection of Well Sealing During Construction.
(i) Authorized Individuals
(A) The following individuals are authorized to witness the well sealing procedure for a
public drinking water well:
(I) an engineer or a geologist from the Division of Drinking Water;
(II) a district engineer of the Department of Environmental Quality;
(III) an authorized representative of the Division of Water Rights; or,
(IV) an individual having written authorization from the Director and meeting the below
listed criteria.
(B) At the time of the well sealing an individual, who is authorized per (i)(A)(IV), shall
present to the well driller a copy of the letter authorizing him or her to witness a well sealing on
behalf of the Division of Drinking Water. A copy of this letter shall be appended to the witness
certification letter.
(C) At least three days before the anticipated well sealing, the well driller shall arrange
for an authorized witness listed in (i)(A) above to witness the procedure. (See R309-515-
6(6)(i)).
(ii) Obtaining Authorization
(A) To be authorized per (i)(A)(IV) above to witness a well sealing procedure, an
individual must have no relationship to the driller or the well's owner. The individual must have
at least five years professional experience designing wells, supervising well drilling or other
equivalent experience associated with well drilling or well sealing that is acceptable to the
Director.
(B) Individuals, desiring the Director's authorization to witness a well sealing procedure,
shall provide the following information to the Director for review over his or her signature
attesting to the correctness of the information:
(I) a detailed description of the applicant's experience with well drilling projects,
including number of years of experience and type of work. Three references confirming this
professional experience are required.
(II) evidence of licensure as a professional engineer or professional geologist in Utah.
(III) no relationship may exist between a person authorized to witness well sealings and
a well driller that would serve as the basis for suspicion of favoritism, leniency, or punitive
action in the performance of this task. Examples of such relationships would be family; former
long-term employment associations; business partnerships, either formal or informal; etc. The
Director's decision, with right of appeal as provided in R305-7, shall be accepted relative to what
constitutes a conflict of interest or a relationship sufficient to disqualify an applicant from all or
specific witness opportunities.
(IV) An acknowledgement that he/she would not be acting as an agent or employee of
the State of Utah and any losses incurred while acting as a witness would not be covered by
governmental immunity or Utah's insurance.
(VI) Willingness to follow established protocols and attend such training events as may
be required by the Director.
(VII) Complete with a minimum 75 percent passing grade, an examination on water well
drilling rules, as offered by the Division of Water Rights.
(C) The Director may rescind the authorization if an individual fails to comply with the
criteria or conditions of authorization listed above.
(iii) Well Seal Certification
The individual witnessing the well sealing procedure shall provide a signed letter,
including the following information, to the Director within 30 days of the well sealing:
(A) certification that the well sealing procedure met all the requirements of Rule R309-
515-6(6)(i);
(B) the water right under which the well was drilled and the well driller's license
number;
(C) the public water system name (if applicable);
(D) the latitude and longitude of the well and method used for its determination;
(E) the well head's approximate elevation;
(F) casing diameter(s), length(s), and material(s);
(G) the size of the annulus between the borehole and casing;
(H) a description of the sealing process including the sealing material used, its volume,
density, method of placement, and depth from surface; and,
(I) the names and company affiliations of other individuals observing the sealing
procedure including, but not limited to, the well driller, the well owner, and/or a consultant.
(c) After completion of the well drilling, the following information shall be submitted
and receive a favorable review before water from the well can be introduced into a public water
system:
(i) a copy of the "Report of Well Driller" as required by the State Engineer's Office
which is complete in all aspects and has been stamped as received by the same;
(ii) a copy of the letter from the authorized individual described in R309-515-6(5)(b)
above, indicating inspection and confirmation that the well was grouted in accordance with the
well drilling specifications and the requirements of this rule;
(iii) a copy of the aquifer drawdown test data, as a minimum, including the yield versus
drawdown test data, as described in R309-515-6(10)(b) along with comments and interpretation
by a licensed professional engineer or licensed professional geologist of the graphic drawdown
information required by R309-515-6(10)(b)(vi)(E);
(iv) a copy of the chemical analyses required by R309-515-4(5);
(v) acceptable evidence that the water system owner has a legal right to divert water for
the proposed use(s) from the well source(s);
(vi) a copy of complete plans and specifications prepared, signed, and stamped by a
licensed professional engineer covering the well housing, equipment, and diversion piping
necessary to introduce water from the well into the distribution system; and
(vii) a bacteriological analysis of water obtained from the well after installation of
permanent equipment, disinfection, and flushing.
(d) An Operation Permit shall be obtained in accordance with R309-500-9 before any
water from the well is introduced into a public water system.
(6) Well Materials, Design, and Construction.
(a) ANSI/NSF Standards 60 and 61 Certification.
All interior surfaces must consist of products complying with ANSI/NSF Standard 61.
This requirement applies to drop pipes, well screens, coatings, adhesives, solders, fluxes, pumps,
switches, electrical wire, sensors, and all other equipment or surfaces which may contact the
drinking water.
All substances introduced into the well during construction or development shall be
certified to comply with ANSI/NSF Standard 60. This requirement applies to drilling fluids
(biocides, clay thinners, defoamers, foamers, loss circulation materials, lubricants, oxygen
scavengers, viscosifiers, weighting agents) and regenerants.
(b) Permanent Steel Casing Pipe shall:
(i) be new single steel casing pipe meeting AWWA Standard A-100, ASTM or API
specifications and having a minimum weight and thickness as given in Table 6 found in R655-4-
11.2.3 of the Utah Administrative Code (Administrative Rules for Water Well Drillers, adopted
April 11, 2011, Division of Water Rights);
(ii) have additional thickness and weight, if minimum thickness is not considered
sufficient to assure reasonable life expectancy of the well;
(iii) be capable of withstanding forces to which it is subjected;
(iv) be equipped with a drive shoe when driven;
(v) have full circumferential welds or threaded coupling joints; and
(vi) project at least 18 inches above the anticipated final ground surface and at least 12
inches above the anticipated pump house floor level. At sites subject to flooding, the top of the
well casing shall terminate at least three feet above the 100-year flood level or the highest known
flood elevation, whichever is higher.
(c) Non-Ferrous Casing Material.
The use of any non-ferrous material for a well casing shall receive prior approval of the
Director based on the ability of the material to perform its desired function. Thermoplastic water
well casing pipe shall meet AWWA Standard A100-06 and shall bear the logo NSF-wc indicating
compliance with NSF Standard 14 for use as well casing.
(d) Disposal of Cuttings.
Cuttings and waste from well drilling operations shall not be discharged into a waterway,
lake, or reservoir. The rules of the Utah Division of Water Quality must be observed with respect
to these discharges.
(e) Packers.
Packers, if used, shall be of material that will not impart taste, odor, toxic substances, or
bacterial contamination to the well water. Lead or partial lead packers are specifically
prohibited.
(f) Screens.
The use of well screens is recommended where appropriate and, if used, they shall:
(i) be constructed of material resistant to damage by chemical action of groundwater or
cleaning operations;
(ii) have size of openings based on sieve analysis of formations or gravel pack materials;
(iii) have sufficient diameter to provide adequate specific capacity and low aperture
entrance velocities;
(iv) be installed so that the operating water level remains above the screen under all
pumping conditions; and,
(v) be provided with a bottom plate or wash-down bottom fitting of the same material as
the screen.
(g) Plumbness and Alignment Requirements.
Every well shall be tested for plumbness and vertical alignment in accordance with
AWWA Standard A100. Plans and specifications submitted for review shall:
(i) have the test method and allowable tolerances clearly stated in the specifications; and,
(ii) clearly indicate any options the design engineer may have if the well fails to meet the
requirements. Generally, wells may be accepted if the misalignment does not interfere with the
installation or operation of the pump or uniform placement of grout.
(h) Casing Perforations.
The placement of perforations in the well casing shall:
(i) be located, as far as practical, to permit the uniform collection of water around the
circumference of the well casing; and,
(ii) be of dimensions and size to restrain the water bearing soils from entrance into the
well.
(i) Well Sealing Techniques and Requirements.
For all public drinking water wells, the annulus between the outermost well casing and
the borehole wall shall be sealed with grout to a depth of at least 100 feet below the ground
surface unless an "exception" is issued by the Director (see R309-500-4(1)). If more than one
casing is used, including a conductor casing, the annulus between the outermost casing and the
next inner casing shall be sealed with grout (meeting the sealing materials requirements of R309-
515-6(i)(ii) herein) or with a water tight steel ring having a thickness equal to that of the
permanent well casing and continuously welded to both casings. If a public drinking water well
will be equipped with a pitless adapter or unit, a well seal shall be installed to a minimum depth
of 110 feet to take into account the top 10 feet of compromised seal interval.
The following shall apply to all drinking water wells:
(i) Consideration During Well Construction.
(A) Sufficient annular opening shall be provided to permit a minimum of two inches of
grout between the outermost permanent casing and the drilled hole, taking into consideration any
joint couplings.
(B) The casing(s) must be placed to permit unobstructed flow and uniform thickness of
grout.
(ii) Sealing Materials.
(A) Neat Cement Grout.
Cement, conforming to ASTM Standard C150, and water, with no more than six gallons
of water per sack of cement, shall be used for two-inch openings. Additives may be used to
increase fluidity subject to approval by the Director.
(B) Concrete Grout.
Equal parts of cement conforming to ASTM Standard C150, and sand, with not more than
six gallons of water per sack of cement, may be used for openings larger than two inches.
(C) Clay Seal.
Where an annular opening greater than six inches is available, a seal of swelling
bentonite meeting the requirements of R655-4-11.4.2 may be used when approved by the
Director.
(iii) Application.
(A) When the annular opening is less than four inches, grout shall be installed under
pressure, by means of a positive displacement grout pump, from the bottom of the annular
opening to be filled.
(B) When the annular opening is four or more inches and 100 feet or less in depth, and
concrete grout is used, it may be placed by gravity through a grout pipe installed to the bottom of
the annular opening in one continuous operation until the annular opening is filled.
(C) All temporary construction casings shall be removed prior to or during the well
sealing operation. Any exceptions shall be approved by the State Engineer's Office, and
evidence of State Engineer's Office's approval shall be submitted to the Director (see R655-4-
11.4.3.1 for conditions concerning leaving temporary surface casing in place). A temporary
construction casing is a casing not intended to be part of the permanent well.
(D) When a "well in a protected aquifer" classification is desired, the grout seal shall
extend from the ground surface down to at least 100 feet below the surface, and through the
protective clay layer (see R309-600-6(1)(x)).
(E) After cement grouting is applied, work on the well shall be discontinued until the
cement or concrete grout has properly set, usually a period of 72 hours.
(j) Water Entered Into Well During Construction.
Any water entering a well during construction shall not be contaminated and should be
obtained from a chlorinated municipal system. Where this is not possible, the water must be
treated to produce a 100 mg/l free chlorine residual in accordance with R655-4-11.6.5.
(k) Gravel Pack Wells.
The following shall apply to gravel packed wells:
(i) the gravel pack material shall be of well-rounded particles, at least 90 percent siliceous
material, no more than five percent acid solubility, smooth and uniform, free of foreign material,
properly sized, washed, and then disinfected immediately prior to or during placement;
(ii) the gravel pack shall be placed in one uniform continuous operation;
(iii) refill pipes, when used, shall be Schedule 40 steel pipe incorporated within the pump
foundation and terminated with screwed or welded caps at least 12 inches above the pump house
floor or concrete apron;
(iv) refill pipes located in the grouted annular opening shall be surrounded by a
minimum of 1.5 inches of grout;
(v) protection shall be provided to prevent leakage of grout into the gravel pack or
screen; and,
(vi) any casings not withdrawn entirely shall meet requirements of R309-515-6(6)(b) or
R309-515-6(6)(c).
(7) Well Development.
(a) Every well shall be developed to remove the native silts and clays, drilling mud, or
finer fraction of the gravel pack.
(b) Development should continue until the maximum specific capacity is obtained from
the completed well.
(c) Where chemical conditioning is required, the specifications shall include provisions
for the method, equipment, chemicals, testing for residual chemicals, and disposal of waste and
inhibitors.
(d) Where blasting procedures may be used, the specifications shall include the
provisions for blasting and cleaning. Special attention shall be given to assure that the grouting
and casing are not damaged by the blasting.
(8) Capping Requirements.
(a) The well shall be securely capped in accordance with R655-4-14.1 until permanent
equipment can be installed.
(b) At all times during the progress of work, the contractor shall provide protection to
prevent tampering with the well or entrance of foreign materials.
(9) Well Abandonment.
(a) Test wells and groundwater sources, which will be permanently abandoned shall be
abandoned in accordance with R655-4-14.
(b) Wells to be abandoned shall be sealed to prevent undesirable exchange of water from
one aquifer to another. Preference shall be given to using a neat cement grout. Where fill
materials are used, which are other than cement grout or concrete, they shall be disinfected and
free of foreign materials. When an abandoned well is filled with cement-grout or concrete, these
materials shall be applied to the well- hole through a pipe, tremie, or bailer.
(10) Well Assessment.
(a) Step Drawdown Test.
Preliminary to the constant-rate test required below, it is recommended that a step-
drawdown test (uniform increases in pumping rates over uniform time intervals with single
drawdown measurements taken at the end of the intervals) be conducted to determine the
maximum pumping rate for the desired intake setting.
(b) Constant-Rate Test.
A "constant-rate" yield and drawdown test shall:
(i) be performed on every production well after well development and prior to placement
of the permanent pump;
(ii) have the test methods clearly indicated in the specifications;
(iii) have a test pump with sufficient capacity that when pumped against the maximum
anticipated drawdown, it will be capable of pumping in excess of the desired design discharge
rate;
(iv) provide for continuous pumping for at least 24 hours or until stabilized drawdown
has continued for at least six hours when test pumped at a "constant-rate" equal to the desired
design discharge rate;
(v) provide the following data:
(A) capacity vs. head characteristics for the test pump (manufacturer's pump curve);
(B) static water level (in feet to the nearest tenth, as measured from an identified datum;
usually the top of casing);
(C) depth of test pump intake; and,
(D) time and date of starting and ending test(s);
(vi) For the "constant-rate" test, provide the following at time intervals sufficient for at
least ten essentially uniform intervals for each log cycle of the graphic evaluation required
below:
(A) record the time since starting test (in minutes);
(B) record the actual pumping rate;
(C) record the pumping water level (in feet to the nearest tenth, as measured from the
same datum used for the static water level);
(D) record the drawdown (pumping water level minus static water level in feet to the
nearest tenth);
(E) provide graphic evaluation on semi-logarithmic graph paper by plotting the
drawdown measurements on the arithmetic scale at locations corresponding to time since starting
test on the logarithmic scale; and,
(vii) Immediately after termination of the constant-rate test, and for a period of time until
there are no changes in depth to water level measurements for at least six hours, record the
following at time intervals similar to those used during the constant-rate pump test:
(A) time since stopping pump test (in minutes),
(B) depth to water level (in feet to the nearest tenth, as measured from the same datum
used for the pumping water level).
(c) Safe Yield.
If the aquifer drawdown test data show that the drawdown has stabilized, the Director
will consider 2/3 of the pumping rate used in the constant-rate test as the safe yield of the well.
The safe yield is used to determine the number of permanent residential connections or ERCs
that a well source can support.
(11) Well Disinfection.
Every new, modified, or reconditioned well including pumping equipment shall be
disinfected before being placed into service for drinking water use. These shall be disinfected
according to AWWA Standards C654-03 and A100-06 as modified to incorporate the following
as a minimum standard:
(i) the well shall be disinfected with a chlorine solution of sufficient volume and strength
and so applied that a concentration of at least 50 parts per million is obtained in all parts of the
well and the equipment installed in the well. This solution shall remain in the well for a period
of at least eight hours; and,
(ii) a satisfactory bacteriologic water sample analysis shall be obtained prior to the use of
water from the well in a public water system.
(12) Well Equipping.
(a) Naturally Flowing Wells.
Naturally flowing wells shall:
(i) have the discharge controlled by valves;
(ii) be provided with permanent casing and sealed by grout; and,
(iii) if erosion of the confining bed adjacent to the well appears likely, special protective
construction may be required by the Director.
(b) Well Pumps.
(i) The design discharge rate of the well pump shall not exceed the rate used during the
constant-rate aquifer drawdown test.
(ii) Wells equipped with line shaft pumps shall:
(A) have the casing firmly connected to the pump structure or have the casing inserted
into the recess extending at least 0.5 inches into the pump base;
(B) have the pump foundation and base designed to prevent fluids from coming into
contact with joints between the pump base and the casing;
(C) be designed such that the intake of the well pump is at least ten feet below the
maximum anticipated drawdown elevation; and,
(D) avoid the use of oil lubrication for pumps with intake screens set at depths less than
400 feet (see R309-105-10(7) and/or R309-515-8(2)for additional requirements of lubricants).
(iii) Where a submersible pump is used:
(A) the top of the casing shall be effectively sealed against the entrance of water under
all conditions of vibration or movement of conductors or cables;
(B) the electrical cable shall be firmly attached to the riser pipe at 20-foot intervals or
less; and,
(C) the intake of the well pump must be at least ten feet below the maximum anticipated
drawdown elevation.
(c) Pitless Well Units and Adapters.
If the excavation surrounding the well casing allowing installation of the pitless unit
compromises the surface seal, the competency of the surface seal shall be restored. Torch-cut
holes in the well casing shall be to neat lines closely following the outline of the pitless adapter
and completely filled with a competent weld with burrs and fins removed prior to the installation
of the pitless unit and adapter.
Pitless well units and adapters shall:
(i) be used to make a connection to a water well casing that is made below the ground. A
below-the-ground connection shall not be submerged in water during installation;
(ii) terminate at least 18 inches above final ground elevation or three feet above the
highest known flood elevation, whichever is greater;
(iii) contain a label or have a certification indicating compliance with the Water Systems
Council Pitless Adapter Standard (PAS-97);
(iv) have suitable access to the interior of the casing in order to disinfect the well;
(v) have a suitable sanitary seal or cover at the upper terminal of the casing that will
prevent the entrance of any fluids or contamination, especially at the connection point of the
electrical cables;
(vi) have suitable access so that measurements of static and pumped water levels in the
well can be obtained;
(vii) allow at least one check valve within the well casing;
(viii) be furnished with a cover that is lockable or otherwise protected against vandalism
or sabotage;
(ix) be shop-fabricated from the point of connection with the well casing to the unit cap
or cover;
(x) be of watertight construction throughout;
(xi) be constructed of materials at least equivalent to and having wall thickness
compatible to the casing;
(xii) have field connection to the lateral discharge from the pitless unit of threaded,
flanged, or mechanical joint connection;
(xiii) be threaded or welded to the well casing. If the connection to the casing is by field
weld, the shop-assembled unit must be designed specifically for field welding to the casing. The
only field welding permitted on the pitless unit is to connect the pitless unit to the casing; and,
(xiv) have an inside diameter as great as that of the well casing, up to and including
casing diameters of 12 inches, to facilitate work and repair on the well, pump, or well screen.
(d) Well Discharge Piping.
The discharge piping shall:
(i) be designed so that the friction loss will be low;
(ii) have control valves and appurtenances located above the pump house floor when an
above-ground discharge is provided;
(iii) be protected against the entrance of contamination;
(iv) be equipped with a smooth-nosed sampling tap, a check valve, a pressure gauge, a
means of measuring flow, and a shutoff valve (with the smooth-nosed sampling tap being the
first item from the well head and the shut-off valve as the last item), unless it is a naturally
flowing well which may need an alternative design;
(v) where a well pumps directly into a distribution system, be equipped with an air
release vacuum relief valve located upstream from the check valve, with exhaust/relief piping
terminating in a down-turned position at least six inches above the well house floor and covered
with a No. 14 mesh corrosion resistant screen. An air release vacuum relief valve is not required
if the specific proposed well head valve and piping design includes provisions for pumping to
waste all trapped air before water is introduced into the distribution system;
(vi) have all exposed piping valves and appurtenances protected against physical damage
and freezing;
(vii) be properly anchored to prevent movement;
(viii) be properly protected against surge or water hammer; and,
(ix) if a pump to waste line exists, it shall not be connected to a sewer/storm drain
without a minimum 12-inch clearance to the flood rim, and the discharge end of the pump-to-
waste line shall be downturned and covered with a No. 4 mesh corrosion resistant screen (refer to
R309-545-10(1)).
(e) Water Level Measurement.
(i) Provisions shall be made to permit periodic measurement of water levels in the
completed well.
(ii) Where permanent water level measuring equipment is installed, it shall be made
using corrosion resistant materials attached firmly to the drop pipe or pump column and installed
to prevent entrance of foreign materials.
(f) Observation Wells.
Observation wells shall be:
(i) constructed in accordance with the requirements for permanent wells if they are to
remain in service after completion of a water supply well; and,
(ii) protected at the upper terminal to preclude entrance of foreign materials.
(g) Electrical Protection.
Sufficient electrical controls shall be placed on all pump motors to eliminate electrical
problems due to phase shifts, surges, lightning, etc.
(13) Well House Construction.
The use of a well house is strongly recommended, particularly in installations utilizing above
ground motors.
[In addition to applicable provisions of R309-540, w]Well pump houses shall conform to the
following:
(a) Casing Projection Above Floor.
The permanent casing for all ground water wells shall project at least 12 inches above the pump
house floor or concrete apron surface and at least 18 inches above the final ground surface.
However, casings terminated in underground vaults may be permitted if the vault is provided
with a "drain-to-daylight" sized to handle in excess of the well flow and surface runoff is
directed away from the vault access.
(b) Floor Drain.
Where a well house is constructed, the floor surface shall be at least six inches above the final
ground elevation and shall be sloped to provide drainage. A "drain-to-daylight" shall be
provided unless highly impractical.
(c) Earth Berm.
Sites subject to flooding shall be provided with an earth berm terminating at an elevation at least
two feet above the highest known flood elevation or other suitable protection as determined by
the Director.
(d) Well Casing Termination at Flood Sites.
The top of the well casing at sites subject to flooding shall terminate at least three feet above the
100-year flood level or the highest known flood elevation, whichever is higher (refer to R309-
515-6(6)(b)(vi)).
(e) Miscellaneous.
The well house shall be ventilated, heated, and lighted in such a manner as to assure adequate
[protection]operation of the equipment [(refer to R309-540-5(2) (a) through (h))].
(f) Fencing.
Where necessary to protect the quality of the well water, the Director may require that
certain wells be fenced in a manner similar to fencing required around spring areas.
(g) Access.
An access shall be provided either through the well house roof or sidewalls in the event
the pump must be pulled for replacement or servicing the well.

R309-515-7. Ground Water - Springs.
(1) General.
Springs vary greatly in their characteristics and they should be observed for some time
prior to development to determine any flow and quality variations. Springs determined to be
under the direct influence of surface water shall comply with surface water treatment
requirements.
(2) Source Protection.
Public drinking water systems are responsible for protecting their spring sources from
contamination. The selection of a spring shall only be made after consideration of the
requirements of R309-515-4. Springs must be located in an area that shall minimize threats from
existing or potential sources of pollution. A Preliminary Evaluation Report on source protection
issues is required by R309-600-13(2). If certain precautions are taken, sewer lines may be
permitted within a public drinking water system's source protection zones at the discretion of the
Director. When sewer lines are permitted in protection zones both sewer lines and manholes
shall be specially constructed as described in R309-515-6(4).
(3) Surface Water Influence.
Some springs yield water that has been filtered underground for years; other springs yield
water that has been filtered underground only a matter of hours. Even with proper development,
the untreated water from certain springs may exhibit turbidity and high coliform counts. This
indicates that the spring water is not being sufficiently filtered in underground travel. If a spring
is determined to be under the direct influence of surface water, it shall be treated to meet the
surface water treatment requirements specified in R309-505-6.p
(4) Pre-construction Submittal
Before beginning spring development construction, the following information shall be
submitted to the Director and approved in writing:
(a) detailed plans and specifications covering the development work;
(b) if available, a copy of an engineer's or geologist's statement indicating:
(i) the historical record of spring flow variation;
(ii) expected minimum flow and the time of year it will occur;
(iii) expected maximum flow and the time of year it will occur;
(iv) expected average flow and,
(v) the behavior of the spring during drought conditions;
(c) acceptable evidence that the water system has a legal right to divert water for the
proposed use(s) from the spring source(s);
(d) a Preliminary Evaluation Report on source protection issues as required by R309-
600-13;
(e) a copy of the chemical analyses required by R309-515-4(5) ; and,
(f) an assessment of whether the spring is under the direct influence of surface
water(refer to R309-505-7(1)(a)).
(5) Information Required after Spring Development.
After development of a spring as a drinking water source, the following information shall
be submitted to the Director for review.
(a) proof of satisfactory bacteriologic quality;
(b) information on the rate of flow developed from the spring.
Immediately after spring development, the water system shall collect monthly spring flow
data during operating seasons when the spring is reasonably accessible, as a minimum, for three
years, and submit spring flow data to the Director for determination of spring yield. After
evaluating the spring flow information including seasonal and annual variations, the Director
will determine a spring yield, which will be used in assessing the number of and type of
connections that can be served by the spring. The spring yield typically is set at the 25th
percentile of the spring flow data. If the spring exhibits significant seasonal or annual variations,
the spring yield may be assessed on a case-by-case basis.
(c) Record drawings of spring development.
(6) Operating Permit Required.
Water from the spring can be introduced into a public water system only after it has been
approved for use, in writing, as evidenced by the issuance of an Operating Permit by the Director
(see R309-500-9).
(7) Spring Development.
The development of springs for drinking water purposes shall comply with the following
requirements.
(a) The spring collection device, whether it be collection tile, perforated pipe, imported
gravel, infiltration boxes, or tunnels must be covered with a minimum of 10 feet of relatively
impervious soil cover. Such cover must extend a minimum of 15 feet in all horizontal directions
from the spring collection device. Clean, inert, non-organic material shall be placed in the
vicinity of the collection device(s).
(b) Where it is impossible to achieve the 10 feet of relatively impervious soil cover, an
acceptable alternate will be the use of an impermeable liner provided that:
(i) the liner has a minimum thickness of at least 40 mils;
(ii) all seams in the liner are folded or welded to prevent leakage;
(iii) the liner is certified as complying with ANSI/NSF Standard 61. This requirement is
waived if certain that the drinking water will not contact the liner;
(iv) the liner is installed in such a manner as to assure its integrity. No stones, two inch
or larger or sharp edged, shall be located within two inches of the liner;
(v) a minimum of two feet of relatively impervious soil cover is placed over the
impermeable liner; and,
(vi) the soil and liner cover are extended a minimum of 15 feet in all horizontal
directions from the collection devices.
(c) Each spring collection area shall be provided with at least one collection box to
permit spring inspection and testing.
(d) All junction boxes and collection boxes, must comply with R309-545 with respect to
access openings, venting, and tank overflow. Lids for these spring boxes shall be gasketed and
the box adequately vented.
(e) The spring collection area shall be surrounded by a fence located a distance of 50 feet
(preferably 100 feet if conditions allow) from all collection devices on land at an elevation equal
to or higher than the collection device, and a distance of 15 feet from all collection devices on
land at an elevation lower than the collection device. The elevation datum to be used is the
surface elevation at the point of collection. The fence shall be at least "stock tight" (see R309-
110). In remote areas where no grazing or public access is possible, an exception to the fencing
requirement may be granted by the Director. In populated areas, a six-foot high chain link fence
with three strands of barbed wire may be required.
(f) Within the fenced area all vegetation having deep roots shall be removed by a means
not negatively affecting water quality.
(g) A diversion channel, or berm, capable of diverting all anticipated surface water runoff
away from the spring collection area shall be constructed immediately inside the fenced area.
(h) A permanent flow-measuring device shall be installed. Flow measurement devices
such as critical depth meters or weirs shall be properly housed and otherwise protected.
(i) The spring shall be developed as thoroughly as possible to minimize the possibility of
excess spring water ponding within the collection area. Where the ponding of spring water is
unavoidable, the excess shall be collected by shallow piping or french drain, and be routed
beyond and down grade of the fenced area required above, whether or not a fence is in place.

R309-515-8. Operation and Maintenance.
(1) Spring Collection Area Maintenance.
(a) Spring collection areas shall be periodically (preferably annually) cleared of deep-
rooted vegetation to prevent root growth from clogging collection lines. Frequent hand or
mechanical clearing of spring collection areas and diversion channel is strongly recommended.
It is advantageous to encourage the growth of grasses and other shallow rooted vegetation for
erosion control and to inhibit the growth of more detrimental flora.
(b) No pesticide (e.g., herbicide) may be applied on a spring collection area without the
prior written approval of the Director. Such approval can be granted only when:
(i) acceptable pesticides are proposed
(ii) the pesticide product manufacturer certifies that no harmful substance will be
imparted to the water and,
(iii) spring development construction meets the requirements of these rules.
(2) Pump Lubricants.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved propylene glycol and
certain types of mineral oil for occasional contact with or for addition to food products. These
oils are commonly referred to as "food-grade mineral oils". All oil lubricated pumps shall utilize
food grade mineral oil suitable for human consumption as determined by the Director.
(3) Algicide Treatment.
No algicide shall be applied to a drinking water source unless specific approval is
obtained from the Director. Such approval will be given only if the algicide is certified as
meeting the requirements of ANSI/NSF Standard 60, Water Treatment Chemicals - Health
Effects.

KEY: drinking water, source development, source maintenance
Date of Last Change: January 21, 2014
Notice of Continuation: March 12, 2020
Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-4-104
Agenda Item
7(B)
DRINKING WATER BOARD PACKET
(Request to Begin Rulemaking)

R309-600. Source Protection: Drinking Water Source Protection For Ground-Water
Sources.
Presented to the Drinking Water Board
February 29, 2029

PROPOSAL:
The Division of Drinking Water proposes to make changes to R309-600-13(3) to delete special
construction criteria for sewer mains, laterals, and maintenance holes when locating new
groundwater sources in Source Protection Zone 2.

HISTORY/CONTEXT:
The proposed amendment to R309-600-13(3) deletes special construction criteria for sewer
mains, laterals, and manholes when locating new groundwater sources in Source Protection Zone
2 because the criteria can rarely be met, and the division frequently must issue exceptions to the
rule requirements. The Division believes the special construction criteria are unnecessary to
provide protection of groundwater sources in Zone 2.

The proposed amendment also deletes the requirement that the Preliminary Evaluation Report
(PER) for the new source demonstrate that the special construction requirements have been met
for sewer mains, laterals, and maintenance holes located in Source Protection Zone 2.

Sewer maintenance holes have been added to the list of facilities that must meet special
construction requirements and a minimum isolation distance from a wellhead or collection area
margin when locating a new groundwater source in Zone 1 for protected aquifers.

The proposed rule has been distributed within the Division and to public water systems,
consultants, and others for review. The Division has considered all comments received and
revised the rule as necessary. The proposed rule has also been pre-filed with the Office of
Administrative Rules for review as required by Executive Order 2021-12, Establishing Effective
Oversight Over State Agency Rulemaking, issued by Governor Cox on May 6, 2021.

DIVISION STAFF/DIRECTOR RECOMMENDATION:
The Division recommends that the Drinking Water Board approve filing the amendment to
R309-600-13(3) with the Office of Administrative Rules (OAR) to begin the rulemaking process
and making the reenacted rule effective on May 8, 2024, if no comments are received during the
comment period. The Division plans to make other nonsubstantive changes in the existing rule
language throughout the rule to conform the Rulewriiting Manual for Utah. The Division will
share the final version of the rule to the Board on June 25, 2024 when the Division returns to
request the Board approval to adopt the rule if no comments are received during the public
comment period.

IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
Request Drinking Water Board Approval to File Proposed Rule: 02/29/2024
Deadline to File Proposed Rule with OAR: 03/15/2024
Publication of Proposed Rule in Utah State Bulletin: 04/01/2024
End of 30-Day Comment Period: 05/01/2024
File Notice of Effective Date with OAR (if no comments received): 05/08/2024
Anticipated Effective Date of Proposed Rule (if no comments received): 05/08/2024
Return to Request Board Approval to Adopt Rule (if no comments received): 06/25/2024

COST ESTIMATE:
The Division anticipates that the proposed rule amendment will have no aggregate cost or
savings to the state budget, local governments, small businesses, non-small businesses, or other
persons.

The proposed rule amendment is expected to have no compliance costs for affected persons,
which are public water suppliers that plan to construct a groundwater source in which sewer
mains, laterals, or maintenance holes are present in Source Protection Zone 2, because the
amendment does not impose new requirements.

R309. Environmental Quality, Drinking Water.
R309-600. Source Protection: Drinking Water Source Protection For Ground-Water
Sources.
R309-600-1. Authority.
Under authority of Section 19-4-104(1)(a)(iv), the Drinking Water Board adopts this rule
which governs the protection of ground-water sources of drinking water.

R309-600-2. Purpose.
Public Water Systems (PWSs) are responsible for protecting their sources of drinking water
from contamination. R309-600 sets forth minimum requirements to establish a uniform, statewide
program for implementation by PWSs to protect their ground-water sources of drinking water.
PWSs are encouraged to enact more stringent programs to protect their sources of drinking water if
they decide they are necessary.
R309-600 applies to ground-water sources and to ground-water sources which are under the
direct influence of surface water which are used by PWSs to supply their systems with drinking
water. However, compliance with this rule is voluntary for existing ground-water sources of
drinking water which are used by public (transient) non-community water systems.

R309-600-3. Implementation.
(1) New Ground-Water Sources - Each PWS shall submit a Preliminary Evaluation Report
(PER) in accordance with R309-600-13(2) for each of its new ground-water sources to the Division
of Drinking Water (DDW). A PWS shall not begin construction of a new source until the Director
concurs with its PER.
(2) Existing Ground-Water Sources - Each PWS shall submit a Drinking Water Source
Protection (DWSP) Plan in accordance with R309-600-7(1) for each of its existing ground-water
sources to DDW according to the following schedule. Well fields or groups of springs may be
considered to be a single source.

TABLE 1

Population Served Percent Of DWSP Plans
By PWS: Sources: Due By:

Over 10,000 50% of wells December 31, 1995
Over 10,000 100% of wells December 31, 1996
3,300-10,000 100% of wells December 31, 1997
Less than 3,300 100% of wells December 31, 1998
Springs and
other sources 100% December 31, 1999

(3) DWSP for existing ground-water sources under the direct influence of surface water
shall be accomplished through delineation of both the ground water and surface water contribution
areas. The requirements of R309-600-7(1) apply to the ground water portion and the requirements
of R309-605 apply to the surface water portion, except that the schedule for submitting these DWSP
plans to DDW is based on the schedule in R309-605-3(1).
(4) PWSs shall maintain all land use agreements which were established under previous
rules to protect their ground-water sources of drinking water from contamination.

R309-600-4. Exceptions.
(1) Exceptions to the requirements of R309-600 or parts thereof may be granted by the
Director to PWSs if: due to compelling factors (which may include economic factors), a PWS is
unable to comply with these requirements, and the granting of an exception will not result in an
unreasonable risk to health.
(2) The Director may prescribe a schedule by which the PWS must come into compliance
with the requirements of R309-600.

R309-600-5. Designated Person.
(1) A designated person shall be appointed and reported in writing to the Director by each
PWS within 180 days of the effective date of R309-600. The designated person's address and
telephone number shall be included in the written correspondence. Additionally, the above
information must be included in each DWSP Plan and PER that is submitted to DDW.
(2) Each PWS shall notify the Director in writing within 30 days of any changes in the
appointment of a designated person.

R309-600-6. Definitions.
(1) The following terms are defined for the purposes of this rule:
(a) "Collection area" means the area surrounding a ground-water source which is underlain
by collection pipes, tile, tunnels, infiltration boxes, or other ground-water collection devices.
(b) "Controls" means the codes, ordinances, rules, and regulations currently in effect to
regulate a potential contamination source. "Controls" also means physical controls which may
prevent contaminants from migrating off of a site and into surface or ground water. "Controls" also
means negligible quantities of contaminants.
(c) "Criteria" means the conceptual standards that form the basis for DWSP area delineation
to include distance, ground-water time of travel, aquifer boundaries, and ground-water divides.
(d) "Criteria threshold" means a value or set of values selected to represent the limits above
or below which a given criterion will cease to provide the desired degree of protection.
(e) "DDW" means Division of Drinking Water.
(f) "DWSP Program" means the program to protect drinking water source protection zones
and management areas from contaminants that may have an adverse effect on the health of persons.
(g) "DWSP Zone" means the surface and subsurface area surrounding a ground-water
source of drinking water supplying a PWS, through which contaminants are reasonably likely to
move toward and reach such ground-water source.
(h) "Designated person" means the person appointed by a PWS to ensure that the
requirements of R309-600 are met.
(i) "Director" means the Director of the Division of Drinking Water.
(j) "Engineer" means a person licensed under the Professional Engineers and Land
Surveyors Licensing Act, 58-22 of the Utah Code, as a "professional engineer" as defined therein.
(k) "Existing ground-water source of drinking water" means a public supply ground-water
source for which plans and specifications were submitted to DDW on or before July 26, 1993.
(l) "Geologist" means a person licensed under the Professional Geologist Licensing Act, 58-
76 of the Utah Code, as a "professional geologist" as defined therein.
(m) "Ground-water Source" means any well, spring, tunnel, adit, or other underground
opening from or through which ground-water flows or is pumped from subsurface water-bearing
formations.
(n) "Hydrogeologic methods" means the techniques used to translate selected criteria and
criteria thresholds into mappable delineation boundaries. These methods include, but are not
limited to, arbitrary fixed radii, analytical calculations and models, hydrogeologic mapping, and
numerical flow models.
(o) "Land management strategies" means zoning and non-zoning strategies which include,
but are not limited to, the following: zoning and subdivision ordinances, site plan reviews, design
and operating standards, source prohibitions, purchase of property and development rights, public
education programs, ground-water monitoring, household hazardous waste collection programs,
water conservation programs, memoranda of understanding, written contracts and agreements, and
so forth.
(p) "Land use agreement" means a written agreement wherein the owner(s) agrees not to
locate or allow the location of uncontrolled potential contamination sources or pollution sources
within zone one of new wells in protected aquifers. The owner(s) must also agree not to locate or
allow the location of pollution sources within zone two of new wells in unprotected aquifers and
new springs unless the pollution source agrees to install design standards which prevent
contaminated discharges to ground water. This restriction must be binding on all heirs, successors,
and assigns. Land use agreements must be recorded with the property description in the local
county recorder's office. Refer to R309-600-13(2)(d).
Land use agreements for protection areas on publicly owned lands need not be recorded in
the local county recorder office. However, a letter must be obtained from the Administrator of the
land in question and meet the requirements described above.
(q) "Management area" means the area outside of zone one and within a two-mile radius
where the Optional Two-mile Radius Delineation Procedure has been used to identify a protection
area.
For wells, land may be excluded from the DWSP management area at locations where it is
more than 100 feet lower in elevation than the total drilled depth of the well.
For springs and tunnels, the DWSP management area is all land at elevation equal to or
higher than, and within a two-mile radius, of the spring or tunnel collection area. The DWSP
management area also includes all land lower in elevation than, and within 100 horizontal feet, of
the spring or tunnel collection area. The elevation datum to be used is the point of water collection.
Land may also be excluded from the DWSP management area at locations where it is separated
from the ground-water source by a surface drainage which is lower in elevation than the spring or
tunnel collection area.
(r) "New ground-water source of drinking water" means a public supply ground-water
source of drinking water for which plans and specifications are submitted to DDW after July 26,
1993.
(s) "Nonpoint source" means any diffuse source of pollutants or contaminants not otherwise
defined as a point source.
(t) "PWS" means public water system.
(u) "Point source" means any discernible, confined, and discrete source of pollutants or
contaminants, including but not limited to any site, pipe, ditch, channel, tunnel, conduit, well,
discrete fissure, container, rolling stock, animal feeding operation with more than ten animal units,
landfill, or vessel or other floating craft, from which pollutants are or may be discharged.
(v) "Pollution source" means point source discharges of contaminants to ground water or
potential discharges of the liquid forms of "extremely hazardous substances" which are stored in
containers in excess of "applicable threshold planning quantities" as specified in SARA Title III.
Examples of possible pollution sources include, but are not limited to, the following: storage
facilities that store the liquid forms of extremely hazardous substances, septic tanks, drain fields,
class V underground injection wells, landfills, open dumps, landfilling of sludge and septage,
manure piles, salt piles, pit privies, drain lines, and animal feeding operations with more than ten
animal units.
The following definitions are part of R309-600 and clarify the meaning of "pollution
source:"
(i) "Animal feeding operation" means a lot or facility where the following conditions are
met: animals have been or will be stabled or confined and fed or maintained for a total of 45 days
or more in any 12 month period, and crops, vegetation forage growth, or post-harvest residues are
not sustained in the normal growing season over any portion of the lot or facility. Two or more
animal feeding operations under common ownership are considered to be a single feeding operation
if they adjoin each other, if they use a common area, or if they use a common system for the
disposal of wastes.
(ii) "Animal unit" means a unit of measurement for any animal feeding operation calculated
by adding the following numbers; the number of slaughter and feeder cattle multiplied by 1.0, plus
the number of mature dairy cattle multiplied by 1.4, plus the number of swine weighing over 55
pounds multiplied by 0.4, plus the number of sheep multiplied by 0.1, plus the number of horses
multiplied by 2.0.
(iii) "Extremely hazardous substances" means those substances which are identified in the
Sec. 302(EHS) column of the "Title III List of Lists: Consolidated List of Chemicals Subject to the
Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) and Section 112(R) of the
Clean Air Act, As Amended," (550B98017). A copy of this document may be obtained from:
NCEPI, PO Box 42419, Cincinnati, OH 45202. Online ordering is also available at
http://www.epa.gov/ncepihom/orderpub.html.
(w) "Potential contamination source" means any facility or site which employs an activity
or procedure which may potentially contaminate ground water. A pollution source is also a
potential contamination source.
(x) "Protected aquifer" means a producing aquifer in which the following conditions are
met:
(i) A naturally protective layer of clay, at least 30 feet in thickness, is present above the
aquifer;
(ii) the PWS provides data to indicate the lateral continuity of the clay layer to the extent of
zone two; and
(iii) the public-supply well is grouted with a grout seal that extends from the ground surface
down to at least 100 feet below the surface, and for a thickness of at least 30 feet through the
protective clay layer.
(y) "Replacement well" means a public-supply well drilled for the sole purpose of replacing
an existing public-supply well which is impaired or made useless by structural difficulties and in
which the following conditions are met:
(i) the proposed well location shall be within a radius of 150 feet from an existing ground-
water supply well, as defined in R309-600-6(1)(k); and
(ii) the PWS provides a copy of the replacement application approved by the State Engineer
(refer to Section 73-3-28 of the Utah Code Annotated).
(z) "Time of travel" means the time required for a particle of water to move in the
producing aquifer from a specific point to a ground-water source of drinking water.
(aa) "Unprotected aquifer" means any aquifer that does not meet the definition of a
protected aquifer.
(bb) "Wellhead" means the physical structure, facility, or device at the land surface from or
through which ground-water flows or is pumped from subsurface, water-bearing formations.

R309-600-7. DWSP Plans.
(1) Each PWS shall develop, submit, and implement a DWSP Plan for each of its ground-
water sources of drinking water.
Required Sections for DWSP Plans - DWSP Plans should be developed in accordance with
the "Standard Report Format for Existing Wells and Springs." This document may be obtained
from DDW. DWSP Plans must include the following seven sections:
(a) DWSP Delineation Report - A DWSP Delineation Report in accordance with R309-
600-9(6) is the first section of a DWSP Plan.
(b) Potential Contamination Source Inventory and Assessment of Controls - A Prioritized
Inventory of Potential Contamination Sources and an assessment of their controls in accordance
with R309-600-10 is the second section of a DWSP Plan.
(c) Management Program to Control Each Preexisting Potential Contamination Source - A
Management Program to Control Each Preexisting Potential Contamination Source in accordance
with R309-600-11 is the third section of a DWSP Plan.
(d) Management Program to Control or Prohibit Future Potential Contamination Sources -
A Plan for Controlling or Prohibiting Future Potential Contamination Sources is the fourth section
of a DWSP Plan. This must be in accordance with R309-600-12, consistent with the general
provisions of this rule, and implemented to an extent allowed under the PWS's authority and
jurisdiction.
(e) Implementation Schedule - Each PWS shall develop a step-by-step implementation
schedule which lists each of its proposed land management strategies with an implementation date
for each strategy.
(f) Resource Evaluation - Each PWS shall assess the financial and other resources which
may be required for it to implement each of its DWSP Plans and determine how these resources
may be acquired.
(g) Recordkeeping - Each PWS shall document changes in each of its DWSP Plans as they
are continuously updated to show current conditions in the protection zones and management areas.
As a DWSP Plan is executed, the PWS shall document any land management strategies that are
implemented. These documents may include any of the following: ordinances, codes, permits,
memoranda of understanding, public education programs, public notifications, and so forth.
(2) DWSP Plan Administration - DWSP Plans shall be submitted, corrected, retained,
implemented, updated, and revised according to the following:
(a) Submitting DWSP Plans - Each PWS shall submit a DWSP Plan to DDW in accordance
with the schedule in R309-600-3 for each of its ground-water sources of drinking water.
(b) Correcting Deficiencies - Each PWS shall correct any deficiencies in a disapproved
DWSP Plan and resubmit it to DDW within 90 days of the disapproval date.
(c) Retaining DWSP Plans - Each PWS shall retain on its premises a current copy of each
of its DWSP Plans.
(d) Implementing DWSP Plans - Each PWS shall begin implementing each of its DWSP
Plans in accordance with its schedule in R309-600-7(1)(e), within 180 days after submittal if they
are not disapproved by the Director.
(e) Updating and Resubmitting DWSP Plans - Each PWS shall update its DWSP Plans as
often as necessary to ensure they show current conditions in the DWSP zones and management
areas. Updated plans also document the implementation of land management strategies in the
recordkeeping section. Actual copies of any ordinances, codes, permits, memoranda of
understanding, public education programs, bill stuffers, newsletters, training session agendas,
minutes of meetings, memoranda for file, etc. must be submitted with the recordkeeping section of
updated plans. DWSP Plans are initially due according to the schedule in R309-600-3. Thereafter,
updated DWSP Plans are due every six years from their original due date. This applies even though
a PWS may have been granted an extension beyond the original due date.
(f) Revising DWSP Plans - Each PWS shall submit a revised DWSP Plan to DDW within
180 days after the reconstruction or redevelopment of any ground-water source of drinking water
which addresses changes in source construction, source development, hydrogeology, delineation,
potential contamination sources, and proposed land management strategies.

R309-600-8. DWSP Plan Review.
(1) The Director shall review each DWSP Plan submitted by PWSs and "concur," "concur
with recommendations," "conditionally concur" or "disapprove" the plan. The Director may also
authorize the designated DDW Source Protection Manager to issue the following actions: "concur"
and "concur with recommendations."
(2) The Director may "disapprove" DWSP Plans for any of the following reasons:
(a) An inaccurate DWSP Delineation Report, a report that uses a non-applicable delineation
method, or a DWSP Plan that is missing this report or any of the information and data required in it
(refer to R309-600-9(6));
(b) an inaccurate Prioritized Inventory of Potential Contamination Sources or a DWSP Plan
that is missing this report or any of the information required in it (refer to R309-600-10(1));
(c) an inaccurate assessment of current controls (refer to R309-600-10(2));
(d) a missing Management Program to Control Each Preexisting Potential Contamination
Source which has been assessed as "not adequately controlled" by the PWS (refer to R309-600-
11(1));
(e) a missing Management Program to Control or Prohibit Future Potential Contamination
Sources (refer to R309-600-12);
(f) a missing or incomplete Implementation Schedule, Resource Evaluation, Recordkeeping
Section, Contingency Plan, or Public Notification Plan (refer to R309-600-7(1)(e)-(g), R309-600-
14, and R309-600-15).
(3) The Director may "concur with recommendations" when PWSs propose management
programs to control preexisting potential contamination sources or management programs to control
or prohibit future potential contamination sources for existing or new drinking water sources which
appear inadequate or ineffective.
(4) The Director may "conditionally concur" with a DWSP Plan or PER. The PWS must
implement the conditions and report compliance the next time the DWSP Plan is due and submitted
to DDW.

R309-600-9. Delineation of Protection Zones and Management Areas.
(1) PWSs shall delineate protection zones or a management area around each of their
ground-water sources of drinking water using the Preferred Delineation Procedure or the Optional
Two-mile Radius Delineation Procedure. The hydrogeologic method used by PWSs shall produce
protection zones or a management area in accordance with the criteria thresholds below. PWSs may
also choose to verify protected aquifer conditions to reduce the level of management controls
applied in applicable protection areas.
(2) Reports must be prepared by a qualified licensed professional - A submitted report
which addresses any of the following sections shall be stamped and signed by a professional
geologist or professional engineer:
(a) A Delineation Report for Estimated DWSP Zones produced using the Preferred
Delineation Procedure, as explained in R309-600-13(2)(a);
(b) a DWSP Delineation Report produced using the Preferred Delineation Procedure, as
explained in R309-600-9(3)(a) and (6)(a);
(c) a report to verify protected aquifer conditions, as explained in R309-600-9(4) and (7);
(d) a report which addresses special conditions, as explained in R309-600-9(5); or
(e) a Hydrogeologic Report to Exclude a Potential Contamination Source, as explained in
R309-600-9(6)(b)(ii).
(3) Criteria Thresholds for Ground-water Sources of Drinking Water:
(a) Preferred Delineation Procedure - Four zones are delineated for management purposes:
(i) Zone one is the area within a 100-foot radius from the wellhead or margin of the
collection area.
(ii) Zone two is the area within a 250-day ground-water time of travel to the wellhead or
margin of the collection area, the boundary of the aquifer(s) which supplies water to the ground-
water source, or the ground-water divide, whichever is closer. If the available data indicate a zone
of increased ground-water velocity within the producing aquifer(s), then time-of-travel calculations
shall be based on this data.
(iii) Zone three (waiver criteria zone) is the area within a 3-year ground-water time of travel
to the wellhead or margin of the collection area, the boundary of the aquifer(s) which supplies water
to the ground-water source, or the ground-water divide, whichever is closer. If the available data
indicate a zone of increased ground-water velocity within the producing aquifer(s), then time-of-
travel calculations shall be based on this data.
(iv) Zone four is the area within a 15-year ground-water time of travel to the wellhead or
margin of the collection area, the boundary of the aquifer(s) which supplies water to the ground-
water source, or the ground-water divide, whichever is closer. If the available data indicate a zone
of increased ground-water velocity within the producing aquifer(s), then time-of-travel calculation
shall be based on this data.
(b) Optional Two-mile Radius Delineation Procedure - In place of the Preferred Delineation
Procedure, PWSs may choose to use the Optional Two-mile Radius Delineation Procedure to
delineate a management area. This procedure is best applied in remote areas where few if any
potential contamination sources are located. Refer to R309-600-6(1)(q) for the definition of a
management area.
(4) Protected Aquifer Classification - PWSs may choose to verify protected aquifer
conditions to reduce the level of management controls for a public-supply well which produces
water from a protected aquifer(s) or to meet one of the requirements of a VOC or pesticide
susceptibility waiver (R309-600-16(4)). Refer to R309-600-6(1)(x) for the definition of a
"protected aquifer."
(5) Special Conditions - Special scientific or engineering studies may be conducted to
support a request for an exception (refer to R309-600-4) due to special conditions. These studies
must be approved by the Director before the PWS begins the study. Special studies may include
confined aquifer conditions, ground-water movement through protective layers, wastewater
transport and fate, etc.
(6) DWSP Delineation Report - Each PWS shall submit a DWSP Delineation Report to
DDW for each of its ground-water sources using the Preferred Delineation Procedure or the
Optional Two-mile Radius Delineation Procedure.
(a) Preferred Delineation Procedure - Delineation reports for protection zones delineated
using the Preferred Delineation Procedure shall include the following information and a list of all
sources or references for this information:
(i) Geologic Data - A brief description of geologic features and aquifer characteristics
observed in the well and area of the potential protection zones. This should include the formal or
informal stratigraphic name(s), lithology of the aquifer(s) and confining unit(s), and description of
fractures and solution cavities (size, abundance, spacing, orientation) and faults (brief description of
location in or near the well, and orientation). Lithologic descriptions can be obtained from surface
hand samples or well cuttings; core samples and laboratory analyses are not necessary. Fractures,
solution cavities, and faults may be described from surface outcrops or drill logs.
(ii) Well Construction Data - If the source is a well, the report shall include the well drillers
log, elevation of the wellhead, borehole radius, casing radius, total depth of the well, depth and
length of the screened or perforated interval(s), well screen or perforation type, casing type, method
of well construction, type of pump, location of pump in the well, and the maximum projected
pumping rate of the well. The maximum pumping rate of the well must be used in the delineation
calculations. Averaged pumping rate values shall not be used.
(iii) Spring Construction Data - If the source is a spring or tunnel the report shall include a
description or diagram of the collection area and method of ground-water collection.
(iv) Aquifer Data for New Wells - A summary report including the calculated hydraulic
conductivity of the aquifer, transmissivity, hydraulic gradient, direction of ground-water flow,
estimated effective porosity, and saturated thickness of the producing aquifer(s). The PWS shall
obtain the hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer from a constant-rate aquifer test and provide the
data as described in R309-515-6(10)(b). Estimated effective porosity must be between 1% and
30%. Clay layers shall not be included in calculations of aquifer thickness or estimated effective
porosity. This report shall include graphs, data, or printouts showing the interpretation of the
aquifer test.
(v) Aquifer Data for Existing Wells - A summary report including the calculated hydraulic
conductivity of the aquifer, transmissivity, hydraulic gradient, direction of ground-water flow,
estimated effective porosity, and saturated thickness of the producing aquifer(s). The PWS shall
obtain the hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer from a constant-rate aquifer test using the existing
pumping equipment. Aquifer tests using observation wells are encouraged, but are not required. If
a previously performed aquifer test is available and includes the required data described below, data
from that test may be used instead. Estimated effective porosity must be between 1% and 30%.
Clay layers shall not be included in calculations of aquifer thickness or estimated effective porosity.
This report shall include graphs, data, or printouts showing the interpretation of the aquifer test.
If a constant-rate aquifer test is not practical, then the PWS shall obtain hydraulic
conductivity of the aquifer using another appropriate method, such as data from a nearby well in the
same aquifer, specific capacity of the well, published hydrogeologic studies of the same aquifer, or
local or regional ground-water models. A constant-rate test may not be practical for such reasons as
insufficient drawdown in the well, inaccessibility of the well for water-level measurements, or
insufficient overflow capacity for the pumped water.
The constant-rate test shall:
(A) Provide for continuous pumping for at least 24 hours or until stabilized drawdown has
continued for at least six hours. Stabilized drawdown is achieved when there is less than one foot of
change of ground-water level in the well within a six-hour period.
(B) Provide data as described in R309-515-6(10)(b)(v) through (vii).
(vi) Additional Data for Observation Wells - If the aquifer test is conducted using
observation wells, the report shall include the following information for each observation well:
location and surface elevation; total depth; depth and length of the screened or perforated intervals;
radius, casing type, screen or perforation type, and method of construction; prepumping ground-
water level; the time-drawdown or distance-drawdown data and curve; and the total drawdown.
(vii) Hydrogeologic Methods and Calculations - These include the ground-water model or
other hydrogeologic method used to delineate the protection zones, all applicable equations, values,
and the calculations which determine the delineated boundaries of zones two, three, and four. The
hydrogeologic method or ground-water model must be reasonably applicable for the aquifer setting.
For wells, the hydrogeologic method or ground-water model must include the effects of drawdown
(increased hydraulic gradient near the well) and interference from other wells.
(viii) Map Showing Boundaries of the DWSP Zones - A map showing the location of the
ground-water source of drinking water and the boundary for each DWSP zone. The base map shall
be a 1:24,000-scale (7.5-minute series) topographic map, such as is published by the U.S.
Geological Survey. Although zone one (100-foot radius around the well or margin of the collection
area) need not be on the map, the complete boundaries for zones two, three, and four must be drawn
and labeled. More detailed maps are optional and may be submitted in addition to the map required
above.
The PWS shall also include a written description of the distances which define the
delineated boundaries of zones two, three, and four. These written descriptions must include the
maximum distances upgradient from the well, the maximum distances downgradient from the well,
and the maximum widths of each protection zone.
(b) Optional Two-Mile Radius Delineation Procedure - Delineation Reports for protection
areas delineated using the Optional Two-mile Radius Delineation Procedure shall include the
following information:
(i) Map Showing Boundaries of the DWSP Management Area - A map showing the
location of the ground-water source of drinking water and the DWSP management area boundary.
The base map shall be a 1:24,000-scale (7.5-minute series) topographic map, such as is published by
the U.S. Geological Survey. Although zone one (100-foot radius around the well or margin of the
collection area) need not be on the map, the complete two-mile radius must be drawn and labeled.
More detailed maps are optional and may be submitted in addition to the map required above.
(ii) Hydrogeologic Report to Exclude a Potential Contamination Source - To exclude a
potential contamination source from the inventory which is required in R309-600-10(1), a
hydrogeologic report is required which clearly demonstrates that the potential contamination source
has no capacity to contaminate the source.
(7) Protected Aquifer Conditions - If a PWS chooses to verify protected aquifer conditions,
it shall submit the following additional data to DDW for each of its ground-water sources for which
the protected aquifer conditions apply. The report must state that the aquifer meets the definition of
a protected aquifer based on the following information:
(a) thickness, depth, and lithology of the protective clay layer;
(b) data to indicate the lateral continuity of the protective clay layer over the extent of zone
two. This may include such data as correlation of beds in multiple wells, published hydrogeologic
studies, stratigraphic studies, potentiometric surface studies, and so forth; and
(c) evidence that the well has been grouted or otherwise sealed from the ground surface to a
depth of at least 100 feet and for a thickness of at least 30 feet through the protective clay layer in
accordance with R309-600-6(1)(x) and R309-515-6(6)(i).

R309-600-10. Potential Contamination Source Inventory and Identification and Assessment
of Controls.
(1) Prioritized Inventory of Potential Contamination Sources - Each PWS shall list all
potential contamination sources within each DWSP zone or management area in priority order and
state the basis for this order. This priority ranking shall be according to relative risk to the drinking
water source. The name and address of each commercial and industrial potential contamination
source is required. Additional information should include the name and phone number of a contact
person and a list of the chemical, biological, and/or radiological hazards associated with each
potential contamination source. Additionally, each PWS shall identify each potential contamination
source as to its location in zone one, two, three, four or in a management area and plot it on the map
required in R309-600-9(6)(a)(viii) or R309-600-9(6)(b)(i).
(a) List of Potential Contamination Sources - A List of Potential Contamination Sources is
found in the "Source Protection User's Guide for Ground-Water Sources." This document may be
obtained from DDW. This list may be used by PWSs as a guide to inventorying potential
contamination sources within their DWSP zones and management areas.
(b) Refining, Expanding, Updating, and Verifying Potential Contamination Sources - Each
PWS shall update its list of potential contamination sources to show current conditions within
DWSP zones or management areas. This includes adding potential contamination sources which
have moved into DWSP zones or management areas, deleting potential contamination sources
which have moved out, improving available data about potential contamination sources, and all
other appropriate refinements.
(2) Identification and Assessment of Current Controls - PWSs are not required to plan and
implement land management strategies for potential contamination source hazards that are assessed
as "adequately controlled." If controls are not identified, the potential contamination source will be
considered to be "not adequately controlled." Additionally, if the hazards at a potential
contamination source cannot be identified, the potential contamination source must be assessed as
"not adequately controlled." Identification and assessment should be limited to one of the following
controls for each applicable hazard: regulatory, best management/pollution prevention, physical, or
negligible quantity. Each of the following topics for a control must be addressed before
identification and assessment will be considered to be complete. Refer to the "Source Protection
User's Guide for Ground-Water Sources" for a list of government agencies and the programs they
administer to control potential contamination sources. This guide may be obtained from DDW.
(a) Regulatory Controls - Identify the enforcement agency and verify that the hazard is
being regulated by them; cite and/or quote applicable references in the regulation, rule or ordinance
which pertain to controlling the hazard; explain how the regulatory control prevents ground-water
contamination; assess the hazard; and set a date to reassess the hazard.
(b) Best Management/Pollution Prevention Practice Controls - List the specific best
management/pollution prevention practices which have been implemented by potential
contamination source management to control the hazard and indicate that they are willing to
continue the use of these practices; explain how these practices prevent ground-water
contamination; assess the hazard; and set a date to reassess the hazard.
(c) Physical Controls - Describe the physical control(s) which have been constructed to
control the hazard; explain how these controls prevent contamination; assess the hazard; and set a
date to reassess the hazard.
(d) Negligible Quantity Control - Identify the quantity of the hazard that is being used,
disposed, stored, manufactured, and/or transported; explain why this amount should be considered a
negligible quantity; assess the hazard; and set a date to reassess the hazard.
(3) For the purpose of meeting the requirements of R309-600, the Director will consider a
PWS's assessment that a potential contamination source which is covered by a permit or approval
under one of the regulatory programs listed below sufficient to demonstrate that the source is
adequately controlled unless otherwise determined by the Director. For all other state programs, the
PWS's assessment is subject to review by the Director; as a result, a PWS's DWSP Plan may be
disapproved if the Director does not concur with its assessment(s).
(a) The Utah Ground-Water Quality Protection program established by Section 19-5-104
and R317-6;
(b) closure plans or Part B permits under authority of the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1984 regarding the monitoring and treatment of ground water;
(c) the Utah Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (UPDES) established by Section 19-5-
104 and R317-8;
(d) the Underground Storage Tank Program established by Section 19-6-403 and R311-200
through R311-208; and
(e) the Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program for classes I-IV established by
Sections 19-5-104 and 40-6-5 and R317-7 and R649-5.

R309-600-11. Management Program to Control Each Preexisting Potential Contamination
Source.
(1) PWSs shall plan land management strategies to control each preexisting potential
contamination source in accordance with their authority and jurisdiction. Land management
strategies must be consistent with the provisions of R309-600, designed to control potential
contamination, and may be regulatory or non-regulatory. Each potential contamination source listed
on the inventory required in R309-600-10(1) and assessed as "not adequately controlled" must be
addressed. Land management strategies must be implemented according to the schedule required in
R309-600-7(1)(e).
(2) PWSs with overlapping protection zones and management areas may cooperate in
controlling a particular preexisting potential contamination source if one PWS will agree to take the
lead in planning and implementing land management strategies and the remaining PWS(s) will
assess the preexisting potential contamination source as "adequately controlled."

R309-600-12. Management Program to Control or Prohibit Future Potential Contamination
Sources for Existing Drinking Water Sources.
(1) PWSs shall plan land management strategies to control or prohibit future potential
contamination sources within each of its DWSP zones or management areas consistent with the
provisions of R309-600 and to an extent allowed under its authority and jurisdiction. Land
management strategies must be designed to control potential contamination and may be regulatory
or non-regulatory. Additionally land management strategies must be implemented according to the
schedule required in R309-600-7(1)(e).
(2) Protection areas may extend into neighboring cities, towns, and counties. Since it may
not be possible for some PWSs to enact regulatory land management strategies outside of their
jurisdiction, except as described below, it is recommended that these PWSs contact their
neighboring cities, towns, and counties to see if they are willing to implement protective ordinances
to prevent ground-water contamination under joint management agreements.
(3) Cities and towns have extraterritorial jurisdiction in accordance with Section 10-8-15 of
the Utah Code Annotated to enact ordinances to protect a stream or "source" from which their water
is taken... "for 15 miles above the point from which it is taken and for a distance of 300 feet on each
side of such stream..." Section 10-8-15 includes ground-water sources.
(4) Zoning ordinances are an effective means to control potential contamination sources
that may want to move into protection areas. They allow PWSs to prohibit facilities that would
discharge contaminants directly to ground water. They also allow PWSs to review plans from
potential contamination sources to ensure there will be adequate spill protection and waste disposal
procedures, etc. If zoning ordinances are not used, PWSs must establish a plan to contact potential
contamination sources individually as they move into protection areas, identify and assess their
controls, and plan land management strategies if they are not adequately controlled.

R309-600-13. New Ground-water Sources of Drinking Water.
(1) Prior to constructing a new ground-water source of drinking water, each PWS shall
develop a PER which demonstrates whether the source meets the requirements of this section and
submit it to DDW. Additionally, engineering information in accordance with R309-515-6(5)(a) or
R309-515-7(4) must be submitted to DDW. The Director will not grant plan approval until both
source protection and engineering requirements are met. Construction standards relating to
protection zones and management areas (fencing, diversion channels, sewer line construction, and
grouting, etc.) are found in R309-515. After the source is constructed a DWSP Plan must be
developed, submitted, and implemented accordingly.
(2) Preliminary Evaluation Report for New Sources of Drinking Water - PERs shall cover
all four zones or the entire management area. PERs should be developed in accordance with the
"Standard Report Format for New Wells and Springs." This document may be obtained from
DDW. PWSs shall include the following four sections in each PER:
(a) Delineation Report for Estimated DWSP Zones - The same requirements apply as in
R309-600-9(6), except that the hydrogeologic data for the PER must be developed using the best
available data which may be obtained from: surrounding wells, published information, or surface
geologic mapping. PWSs must use the Preferred Delineation Procedure to delineate protection
zones for new wells. The Delineation Report for Estimated DWSP Zones shall be stamped and
signed by a professional geologist or professional engineer unless the Optional Two-Mile Radius
Delineation Procedure is used for a new spring.
(b) Inventory of Potential Contamination Sources and Identification and Assessment of
Controls - The same requirements apply as in R309-600-10(1) and (2). Additionally, the PER must
demonstrate that the source meets the following requirements:
(i) Protection Areas Delineated using the Preferred Delineation Procedure in Protected
Aquifers - A PWS shall not locate a new ground-water source of drinking water where an
uncontrolled potential contamination source or a pollution source exists within zone one.
(ii) Protection Areas Delineated using the Preferred Delineation Procedure in Unprotected
Aquifers - A PWS shall not locate a new ground-water source of drinking water where an
uncontrolled potential contamination source or an uncontrolled pollution source exists within zone
one. Additionally, a new ground-water source of drinking water may not be located where a
pollution source exists within zone two unless the pollution source implements design standards
which prevent contaminated discharges to ground water.
(iii) Management Areas Delineated using the Optional Two-Mile Radius Delineation
Procedure - A PWS shall not locate a new spring where an uncontrolled potential contamination
source or a pollution source exists within zone one. Additionally, a new spring may not be located
where a pollution source exist within the management area unless: a hydrogeologic report in
accordance with R309-600-9(6)(b)(ii) which verifies that it does not impact the spring; or the
pollution source implements design standards which prevent contaminated discharges to ground
water.
(c) Land Ownership Map - A land ownership map which includes all land within zones one
and two or the entire management area. Additionally, include a list which exclusively identifies the
land owners in zones one and two or the management area, the parcel(s) of land which they own,
and the zone in which they own land. A land ownership map and list are not required if ordinances
are used to protect these areas.
(d) Land Use Agreements, Letters of Intent, or Zoning Ordinances - Land use agreements
which meet the requirements of the definition in R309-600-6(1)(p). Zoning ordinances which are
already in effect or letters of intent may be substituted for land use agreements; however, they must
accomplish the same level of protection that is required in a land use agreement. Letters of intent
must be notarized, include the same language that is required in land use agreements, and contain
the statement that "the owner agrees to record the land use agreement in the county recorder's office,
if the source proves to be an acceptable drinking water source." The PWS shall not introduce a new
source into its system until copies of all applicable recorded land use agreements are submitted to
DDW.
(3) Sewers Within DWSP Zones One and [Management Areas] – [Sewer lines may not
be located within zones one and two or a management area unless the criteria identified below
are met]. A new groundwater source shall not be located where a sanitary sewer line, sewer
lateral, or sewer maintenance hole exists within zone one unless the criteria identified in
Subsections R309-600-13(3)(a) or R309-600-13(3)(b) are met. If sewer lines, sewer laterals, or
sewer maintenance holes are located or planned to be located within zone[s] one [and two or a
management area], the PER must demonstrate that they comply with these criteria. Sewer lines
that comply with these criteria may be assessed as adequately controlled potential contamination
sources.
(a) Unprotected Aquifers - In zone one, each sewer line, sewer lateral, and sewer
maintenance hole shall be constructed in accordance with Subsection R309-515-6(4) and shall be
at least 50 feet from the wellhead or margin of the collection area.
[ (i) Zone one- all sewer lines and laterals shall be at least 50 feet from the wellhead or
margin of the collection area, and be constructed in accordance to R309-515-6.]
[ (ii) Zone two- all sewer lines and laterals within zone two or a management area shall be
constructed in accordance with R309-515-6.]
(b) Protected Aquifers - in zone one. [all] each sewer line[s], sewer lateral, and [laterals]
sewer maintenance hole shall be constructed in accordance with Subsection R309-515-6(4), and
shall be at least 10 feet from the wellhead or margin of the collection area.
(4) Use waivers for the VOC and pesticide parameter groups may be issued if the inventory
of potential contamination sources indicates that the chemicals within these parameter groups are
not used, disposed, stored, transported, or manufactured within zones one, two, and three or the
management area.
(5) Replacement Wells - A PER is not required for proposed wells, if the PWS receives
written notification from the Director that the well is classified as a replacement well. The PWS
must submit a letter requesting that the well be classified as a replacement well and include
documentation to show that the conditions required in R309-600-6(1)(y) are met. If a proposed well
is classified as a replacement well, the PWS is still required to submit and obtain written approval
for all other information as required in:
(a) DWSP Plan for New Sources of Drinking Water (refer to R309-600-13(6), and
(b) the Outline of Well Approval Process (refer to R309-515-6(5)).
(6) DWSP Plan for New Sources of Drinking Water - The PWS shall submit a DWSP Plan
in accordance with R309-600-7(1) for any new ground-water source of drinking water within one
year after the date of the Director's concurrence letter for the PER. In developing this DWSP Plan,
PWSs shall refine the information in the PER by applying any new, as-constructed characteristics of
the source (i.e., pumping rate, aquifer test, etc.).

R309-600-14. Contingency Plans.
PWSs shall submit a Contingency Plan which includes all sources of drinking water for their
entire water system to DDW concurrently with the submission of their first DWSP Plan. Guidance
for developing Contingency Plans may be found in the "Source Protection User's Guide for Ground-
Water Sources." This document may be obtained from DDW.

R309-600-15. Public Notification.
A PWSs consumers must be notified that its DWSP plans are available for their review.
This notification must be released to the public by December 31, 2003. Public notifications shall
address all of the PWS's sources and include the following:
(a) A discussion of the general types of potential contamination sources within the
protection zones;
(b) an analysis that rates the system's susceptibility to contamination as low, medium, or
high; and
(c) a statement that the system's complete DWSP plans are available to the public upon
request.
Examples of means of notifying the public and examples of public notification material are
discussed in the "Source Protection User's Guide for Ground-Water Sources" which may be
obtained from DDW.

R309-600-16. Monitoring Reduction Waivers.
(1) Three types of monitoring waivers are available to PWSs. They are: a) reliably and
consistently, b) use, and c) susceptibility. The criteria for establishing a reliably and consistently
waiver is set forth in R309-205. The criteria for use and susceptibility waivers follow.
(2) If a source's DWSP plan is due according to the schedule in R309-600-3, and is not
submitted to DDW, its use and susceptibility waivers for the VOC and pesticide parameter groups
(refer to R309-205-6(1)(e) and (f); and (R309-205-6(2)(h) and (i)) will expire unless an exception
(refer to R309-600-4) for a new due date has been granted. Additionally, current use and
susceptibility waivers for the VOC, pesticide and unregulated parameter groups will expire upon
review of a DWSP plan, if these waivers are not addressed in the plan. Monitoring reduction
waivers must be renewed every six years at the time the PWSs Updated DWSP Plans are due and be
addressed therein.
(3) Use Waivers - If the chemicals within the VOC and/or pesticide parameter group(s)
(refer to R309-200 table 200-3 and 200-2) have not been used, disposed, stored, transported, or
manufactured within the past five years within zones one, two, and three, the source may be eligible
for a use waiver. To qualify for a VOC and/or pesticide use waiver, a PWS must complete the
following two steps:
(a) List the chemicals which are used, disposed, stored, transported, and manufactured at
each potential contamination source within zones one, two, and three where the use of the chemicals
within the VOC and pesticide parameter groups are likely; and
(b) submit a dated statement which is signed by the system's designated person that none of
the VOCs and pesticides within these respective parameter groups have been used, disposed, stored,
transported, or manufactured within the past five years within zones one, two, and three.
(4) Susceptibility Waivers - If a source does not qualify for use waivers, and if reliably and
consistently waivers have not been issued, it may be eligible for susceptibility waivers.
Susceptibility waivers tolerate the use, disposal, storage, transport, and manufacture of chemicals
within zones one, two, and three as long as the PWS can demonstrate that the source is not
susceptible to contamination from them. To qualify for a VOC and/or pesticide susceptibility
waiver, a PWS must complete the following steps:'
(a) Submit the monitoring results of at least one applicable sample from the VOC and/or
pesticide parameter group(s) that has been taken within the past six years. A non-detectable
analysis for each chemical within the parameter group(s) is required;
(b) submit a dated statement from the designated person verifying that the PWS is confident
that a susceptibility waiver for the VOC and/or pesticide parameter group(s) will not threaten public
health; and
(c) verify that the source is developed in a protected aquifer, as defined in R309-600-
6(1)(x), and have a public education program which addresses proper use and disposal practices for
pesticides and VOCs which is described in the management sections of the DWSP plan.
(5) Special Waiver Conditions - Special scientific or engineering studies or best
management practices may be developed to support a request for an exception to paragraph R309-
600-16(4)(c) due to special conditions. These studies must be approved by the Director before the
PWS begins the study. Special waiver condition studies may include:
(a) geology and construction/grout seal of the well to demonstrate geologic protection;
(b) memoranda of agreement which addresses best management practices for VOCs and/or
pesticides with industrial, agricultural, and commercial facilities which use, store, transport,
manufacture, or dispose of the chemicals within these parameter groups;
(c) public education programs which address best management practices for VOCs and/or
pesticides;
(d) contaminant quantities;
(e) affected land area; and/or
(f) fate and transport studies of the VOCs and/or pesticides which are listed as hazards at
the PCSs within zones one, two, and three, and any other conditions which may be identified by the
PWS and approved by the Director.

KEY: drinking water, environmental health
Date of Last Change: November 6, 2017
Notice of Continuation: March 12, 2020
Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-4-104(1)(a)(iv)

Agenda Item
7(C)
DRINKING WATER BOARD PACKET
(Request to Begin Rulemaking)

R309-540
Facility Design and Operation: Pump Stations
Presented to the Drinking Water Board
February 29, 2024

PROPOSAL:
The Division of Drinking Water proposes to repeal R309-540, Pump Stations, and to reenact a
new rule in its place. The division is taking this action to make the requirements for design and
construction of pump facilities and hydropneumatic pressure facilities clearer and easier to
follow for public water suppliers. The title of the reenacted rule will be changed from Pump
Stations to Pump and Hydropneumatic Pressure Facilities. Also, the Division made other
nonsubstantive changes in the rule to conform to the Rulewriting Manual for Utah.

HISTORY/CONTEXT:
R309-540, Pump Stations, was adopted in its current form on February 15, 2009. Most of the
requirements of the current rule have been retained in the proposed rule in a reformatted and
reorganized form. Some of the requirements of the current rule are unnecessary to support the
purpose of the rule and have not been carried over to the proposed rule. The division would also
like to add new requirements to the rule primarily to provide greater clarity.

Because of the substantial rearrangement of the requirements of the rule, the division is
proposing to repeal the current rule and reenact a new rule in its place. In this case, the repeal
and reenactment process is less complicated than amending the current rule. A list is attached of
the major differences between the current rule and the proposed rule.

The proposed rule has been distributed within the division and to public water systems,
consultants, and others for review. The division has considered all comments received and
revised the proposed rule when necessary. The proposed rule has also been pre-filed with the
Office of Administrative Rules for review as required by Executive Order 2021-12, Establishing
Effective Oversight Over State Agency Rulemaking, issued by Governor Cox on May 6, 2021.

DIVISION STAFF/DIRECTOR RECOMMENDATION:
The Division recommends that the Drinking Water Board approve filing to repeal and reenact
R309-540 with the Office of Administrative Rules (OAR) to begin the rulemaking process and
making the reenacted rule effective on May 08, 2024, if no comments are received during the
comment period.

IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
Request Drinking Water Board Approval to File Proposed Rule: 02/29/2024
Deadline to File Proposed Rule with OAR: 03/15/2024
Publication of Proposed Rule in Utah State Bulletin: 04/01/2024
End of 30-Day Comment Period: 05/01/2024
File Notice of Effective Date with OAR (if no comments received): 05/08/2024
Anticipated Effective Date of Proposed Rule (if no comments received): 05/08/2024
Return to Request Board Approval to Adopt Rule (if no comments received): 06/25/2024

COST ESTIMATE:
The Division anticipates that the proposed rule will have no aggregate costs or savings to the
state budget, local governments, small businesses, non-small businesses, or other persons.
The proposed rule only applies to affected persons that own or operate a public water system that
either has or plans to construct pump or hydropneumatic pressure facilities. The proposed rule
amendment is anticipated to have no compliance costs for affected persons because it does not
impose new requirements.

R309. Environmental Quality, Drinking Water.
[R309-540. Facility Design and Operation: Pump Stations.
R309-540-1. Purpose.
The purpose of this rule is to provide specific requirements for pump stations utilized to
deliver drinking water to facilities of public water systems. It is intended to be applied in
conjunction with rules R309-500 through R309-550. Collectively, these rules govern the design,
construction, operation and maintenance of public drinking water system facilities. These rules are
intended to assure that such facilities are reliably capable of supplying adequate quantities of water
which consistently meet applicable drinking water quality requirements and do not pose a threat to
general public health.

R309-540-2. Authority.
This rule is promulgated by the Drinking Water Board as authorized by Title 19,
Environmental Quality Code, Chapter 4, Safe Drinking Water Act, Subsection 104(1)(a)(ii) of the
Utah Code and in accordance with 63G-3 of the same, known as the Administrative Rulemaking
Act.

R309-540-3. Definitions.
Definitions for certain terms used in this rule are given in R309-110 but may be further
clarified herein.

R309-540-4. General.
Pumping stations shall be designed to maintain the sanitary quality of water and to provide
ample quantities of water at sufficient pressure.

R309-540-5. Pumping Facilities.
(1) Location.
(a) The pumping station shall be designed such that:
(i) the proposed site will meet the requirements for sanitary protection of water quality,
hydraulics of the system, and protection against interruption of service by fire, flood or any other
hazard;
(ii) the access to the pump station shall be six inches above the surrounding ground and the
station located at an elevation which is a minimum of three feet above the 100-year flood elevation,
or three feet above the highest recorded flood elevation, which ever is higher, or protected to such
elevations;
(iii) the station is readily accessible at all times unless permitted to be out of service for the
period of inaccessibility;
(iv) surrounding ground is graded so as to lead surface drainage away from the station; and
(v) the station is protected to prevent vandalism and entrance by animals or unauthorized
persons.
(2) Pumping Stations.
(a) Building structures for both raw and drinking water shall:
(i) have adequate space for the installation of additional pumping units if needed, and for
the safe servicing of all equipment;
(ii) be of durable construction, fire and weather resistant, with outward-opening doors;
(iii) have an interior floor elevation at least six inches above the exterior finished grade;
(iv) have any underground facilities, especially wet wells, waterproofed;
(v) have all interior floors drained in such a manner that the quality of drinking water
contained in any wet wells will not be endangered. All floors shall slope at least one percent (one
foot every 100 feet) to a suitable drain; and
(vi) provide a suitable outlet for drainage from pump glands without discharging onto the
floor.
(b) Suction wells shall:
(i) be watertight;
(ii) have floors sloped to permit removal of water and entrained solids;
(iii) be covered or otherwise protected against contamination; and
(iv) have two pumping compartments or other means to allow the suction well to be taken
out of service for inspection, maintenance, or repair.
(c) Servicing equipment shall consist of:
(i) crane-ways, hoist beams, eyebolts, or other adequate facilities for servicing or removal
of pumps, motors or other heavy equipment;
(ii) openings in floors, roofs or wherever else needed for removal of heavy or bulky
equipment; and
(iii) a convenient tool board, or other facilities as needed, for proper maintenance of the
equipment.
(d) Stairways and ladders shall:
(i) be provided between all floors, and in pits or compartments which must be entered; and
(ii) have handrails on both sides, and treads of non-slip material. They shall have risers not
exceeding nine inches and treads wide enough for safety.
(e) Heating provisions shall be adequate for:
(i) the comfort of the operator; and
(ii) the safe and efficient operation of the equipment.
(f) Ventilation shall:
(i) conform to existing local and/or state codes; and
(ii) forced ventilation of at least six changes of air per hour shall be provided for all rooms,
compartments, pits and other enclosures below ground floor, and any area where unsafe atmosphere
may develop or where excessive heat may be built up.
(g) Lighting.
Pump stations shall be adequately lighted throughout. All electrical work shall conform to
the requirements of the relevant state and/or local building codes.
(h) Sanitary and other conveniences.
Plumbing shall be so installed as to prevent contamination of a public water supply. Wastes
shall be discharged in accordance with the plumbing code, R317-4, or R317-1-3.
(3) Pumps.
(a) Capacity.
Capacity shall be provided such that the pump or pumps shall be capable of providing the
peak day demand of the system or the specific portion of the system serviced.
The pumping units shall:
(i) have ample capacity to supply the peak day demand against the required distribution
system pressure without dangerous overloading;
(ii) be driven by prime movers able to meet the maximum horsepower condition of the
pumps without use of service factors;
(iii) be provided readily available spare parts and tools; and
(iv) be served by control equipment that has proper heater and overload protection for air
temperature encountered.
(b) Suction Lift.
Suction lift, where possible, shall be avoided. If suction lift is necessary, the required lift
shall be within the pump manufacturer's recommended limits and provision shall be made for
priming the pumps.
(c) Priming.
Prime water shall not be of lesser sanitary quality than that of the water being pumped.
Means shall be provided to prevent back siphonage. When an air-operated ejector is used, the
screened intake shall draw clean air from a point at least 10 feet above the ground or other source.
(4) Booster Pumps.
(a) Booster pumps shall be located or controlled so that:
(i) they will not produce negative pressure in their suction lines;
(ii) automatic cutoff pressure shall be at least 10 psi in the suction line;
(iii) automatic or remote control devices shall have a range between the start and cutoff
pressure which will prevent excessive cycling; and
(iv) a bypass is available.
(b) Inline booster pumps (pumps withdrawing water directly from distribution lines without
the benefit of storage and feeding such water directly into other distribution lines rather than
storage), in addition to the other requirements of this section, shall have at least two pumping units
(such that with any one pump out of service, the remaining pump or pumps shall be capable of
providing the peak day demand of the specific portion of the system serviced), shall be accessible
for servicing and repair and located or controlled so that the intake pressure shall be at least 20 psi
when the pump or pumps are in normal operation.
(c) Individual home booster pumps shall not be allowed for any individual service from the
public water supply main.
(5) Automatic and remote controlled stations.
All remote controlled stations shall be electrically operated and controlled and shall have
signaling apparatus of proven performance. Installation of electrical equipment shall conform with
the applicable state and local electrical codes and the National Electrical Code.
(6) Appurtenances.
(a) Valves.
Valves shall be used to permit satisfactory operation, maintenance, and repair of the
equipment. If foot valves are necessary, they shall have a net valve area of at least 2 1/2 times the
area of the suction pipe and they shall have a positive-acting check valve on the discharge side
between the pump and the shut-off valve.
(b) Piping.
Piping within and near pumping stations shall:
(i) be designed so that the friction losses will be minimized;
(ii) not be subject to contamination;
(iii) have watertight joints;
(iv) be protected against surge or water hammer; and
(v) be such that each pump has an individual suction line or that the lines shall be so
manifolded that they will insure similar hydraulic and operating conditions.
(c) Gauges and Meters.
Each pump shall:
(i) have a standard pressure gauge on its discharge line;
(ii) have a compound gauge (capable of indicating negative pressure or vacuum as well as
positive pressure) on its suction line; and
(iii) have recording gauges in the larger stations.
(d) Water Seal.
Where pumps utilize water seals, the seals shall:
(i) not be supplied with water of a lesser sanitary quality than that of the water being
pumped; and
(ii) when pumps are sealed with potable water and are pumping water of lesser sanitary
quality, the seal shall be provided with a break tank open to atmospheric pressure, and have an air
gap of at least six inches or two pipe diameters, whichever is greater, between the feeder line and
the spill line of the tank.
(e) Controls.
Controls shall be designed in such a manner that they will operate their prime movers, and
accessories, at the rated capacity without dangerous overload. Where two or more pumps are
installed, provision shall be made for alternation. Provision shall be made to prevent energizing the
motor in the event of a backspin cycle. Electrical controls shall be protected against flooding.
Equipment shall be provided or other arrangements made to prevent surge pressures from activating
controls which switch on pumps or activate other equipment outside the normal design cycle of
operation.
(f) Standby Power.
Standby power, to ensure continuous service when the primary power has been interrupted,
shall be provided from at least two independent sources or a standby or an auxiliary source shall be
provided. If standby power is provided by onsite generators or engines, the fuel storage and fuel
line must be designed to protect the water supply from contamination.
(g) Water Pre-Lubrication.
When automatic pre-lubrication of pump bearings is necessary and an auxiliary direct drive
power supply is provided, the pre-lubrication line shall be provided with a valved bypass around the
automatic control so that the bearings can, if necessary, be lubricated manually before the pump is
started or the pre-lubrication controls shall be wired to the auxiliary power supply.

R309-540-6. Hydropneumatic Systems.
(1) General.
Hydropneumatic systems shall comply with all appropriate sections of R309-540-5 except
as otherwise indicated herein.
Unpressurized ground level or elevated storage, designed in accordance with R309-545,
shall be provided for community type public water systems or non-transient non-community
systems where a demand in excess of the capacity of the source(s) is required, in addition to the
diaphragm or air tanks. Diaphragm or air pressure tank storage shall not be considered for fire
protection purposes or effective system storage for community type systems.
(2) Location.
If diaphragm or air tanks and appurtenances are located below ground, adequate provisions
for drainage, ventilation, maintenance, and flood protection shall be made and the electrical controls
shall be located above grade so as to be protected from flooding as required by R309-540-5(6)(e).
Any discharge piping from combination air release/vacuum relief valves(air/vac's) or pressure relief
valves located in below ground chambers shall comply with all the pertinent requirements of R309-
550-6(6).
(3) Operating Pressures.
The system shall be designed to provide minimum pressures in R309-105-9 at all points in
the distribution system. A pressure gauge shall be installed on the pressure tank inlet line.
(4) Piping.
In addition to the bypass required by R309-540-5(4)(iv) on the pumps, the diaphragm or air
tanks shall have sufficient bypass piping to permit operation of the hydropneumatic system while
one or more of the tanks are being repaired, replaced or painted.
(5) Pumps.
At least two pumping units shall be provided except for those type systems not requiring
unpressurized storage in R309-540-6(1); they may use the pump within their groundwater source to
pressurize the diaphragm or air tanks. With any pump out of service the remaining pump or pumps
shall be capable of providing the peak instantaneous demand of the system as described in R309-
510-9(2), while recharging the pressure tank at 115 percent of the upper pressure setting. Pump
cycling shall not exceed 15 starts per hour, with a maximum of ten starts per hour preferred.
(6) Pressure Tanks.
(a) Pressure tanks shall meet the requirement of state and local laws and regulations for the
manufacture and installation of unfired pressure vessels. Interior coatings or diaphragms used in
pressure tanks that will come into contact with the drinking water shall comply with ANSI/NSF
Standard 61. Non diaphragm pressure tanks shall have an access manhole, a drain, control
equipment consisting of pressure gauge, water sight glass, automatic or manual air blow-off, means
for adding air, and pressure operated start-stop controls for the pumps.
(b) The minimum volume of the pressure tank or combination of tanks shall be greater than
or equal to the sum of S and the value of CX divided by 4W.
where the following values are used in the equation above:
C = minutes per operating cycle, four minutes to meet the requirements of R309-540-6(5)
above or preferably six minutes, and is equal to pump ON time plus pump OFF time.
X = output capacity rating of the pump(s) at the high pressure condition in the tank(s), in
gpm.
W = percent of volume withdrawn during a given drop in tank pressure: specifically,
between Ph and Pl. W = 100(Ph- Pl)/Ph where Ph = high pressure in tank in psia (high absolute
pressure) and Pl = low pressure in tank is psia (low absolute pressure). Values of W range typically
from 0.26 to 0.31 for pressure differentials of 15 to 30 psi and high system pressures of 45 to 85 psi
at elevations of approximately 5,000 feet.
S = water seal volume in gallons, the volume of inactive water remaining in tank at low
pressure condition.
(7) Air Volume.
The method of adjusting the air volume shall be acceptable to the Director. Air delivered by
compressors to the pressure tank shall be adequately filtered, oil free, and be of adequate volume.
Any intake shall be screened and draw clean air from a point at least 10 feet above the ground or
other source of possible contamination, unless the air is filtered by an apparatus approved by the
Director. Discharge piping from air relief valves shall be designed and installed with screens to
eliminate the possibility of contamination from this source.
(8) Water Seal.
For air pressure tanks without an internal diaphragm the volume of water remaining in a air
pressure tank at the lower pressure setting shall be sufficient to provide an adequate water seal at the
outlet to prevent the leakage of air.
The following water seal depths shall be considered as minimum requirements.
(a) Horizontal outlets shall maintain sufficient depth, as measured from the centerline of the
horizontal outlet pipe, such that the depth is greater than or equal to the sum of d and twice the value
v2 divided by 2G.
(b) Vertical outlets, if unbaffled, the depth shall be the same as in (a) except measured from
the pipe outlet; if baffled, the depth shall be greater than or equal to the value v2 divided by 2G.
where the following values are used in the equations above:
v = the axial velocity in the pipe outlet for the peak instantaneous demand flow rate of the
system.
d = the diameter of the outlet pipe in ft.
G = the gravitational constant of 32.2 ft/sec/sec.
(9) Standby Power Supply.
Where a hydropneumatic system is intended to serve a public water system, categorized as a
community water system as defined in R309-110, a standby source of power shall be provided.]

R309-540. Facility Design and Operation: Pump and Hydropneumatic Pressure Facilities.
R309-540-1. Purpose.
The purpose of this rule is to provide specific requirements for pump stations utilized to
deliver drinking water to facilities of public water systems. It is intended to be applied in
conjunction with Rules R309-500 through R309-550. Collectively, these rules govern the design,
construction, operation, and maintenance of public drinking water system facilities. These rules
are intended to assure that facilities are reliably capable of supplying quantities of water which
consistently meet applicable drinking water quality requirements of Rules R309-510 and R309-
200 and do not pose a threat to general public health.

R309-540-2. Authority.
This rule is promulgated by the Drinking Water Board as authorized by Title 19, Chapter
4, Safe Drinking Water Act, Subsection 104(1)(a)(ii), and in accordance with Title 63G, Chapter
3 Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act.

R309-540-3. Definitions.
Definitions for certain terms used in this rule are given in Rule R309-110. Terms not
defined in Rule R309-100 but used in Rule R309-540 include those defined in Subsections
R309-540-3(1) through (8).
(1) "Air-Over-Water Hydropneumatic Tank" means a pressure tank with a single
chamber in which air and water are in direct contact. Water pumped into the tank compresses the
air above it.
(2) “Bladder Hydropneumatic Tank” means a pressure tank that has a bladder in the
bottom section of the tank that holds water under pressure. Water pumped into the bladder
compresses the air in the upper section of the tank.
(3) “Booster Pump” means a pump that increases pressure in a water distribution system
or supplies water to an elevated storage tank. The water supplying a booster pump is provided by
a water storage tank or a water distribution line.
(4) “Diaphragm Hydropneumatic Tank” means a pressure tank with a fixed, flexible
diaphragm that separates water in the lower section of the tank from air in the upper section.
Water pumped into the lower section compresses the air in the upper section of the tank.
(5) “NSF/ANSI 60” - the joint National Sanitation Foundation/American National
Standards Institute 60, Drinking Water Treatment Chemicals - Health Effects
(6) “NSF/ANSI 61” - the joint National Sanitation Foundation/American National
Standards Institute 60, Drinking Water System Components - Health Effects
(7) “Pump Station” means a structure housing pumps and associated piping, valves, and
auxiliary equipment.
(8) “Service Factor” - A multiplier which, when applied to rated power, indicates a
permissible power loading that may be carried under the conditions specified for the service
factor.

R309-540-4. Applicability.
Rule R309-540 applies to a pump, other than a well pump, that pumps drinking water for
distribution or storage by a public water system.

R309-540-5. Pump Stations.
(1) Location. The location for a pump station shall be compatible with the hydraulics of
the water system.
(2) Flood Protection and Site Drainage.
(a) A pump station shall be located at, or protected from, flooding to an elevation of at
least three feet above either the 100 year flood or highest recorded flood, whichever is higher.
(b) The site for a pump station shall be graded to direct surface water drainage away
from the pump station.
(3) Pump Station Drainage and Flooding Prohibition. A pump station:
(a) may not be subject to flooding,
(b) shall be drained to prevent water from collecting on the floor; and
(c) shall provide an outlet for drainage from pump glands, air release valves, and other
equipment without allowing water to flow across the floor to reach the outlet. See Subsection
R309-550-6(6) for clearance requirements for air release vent pipes discharging to floor drains.
(4) Access .
(a) A pump station shall be accessible.
(b) Access to a pump station in an underground vault or compartment or between floors
of a pump station shall be provided by a permanent stairway, ladder, or ramp.
(5) Construction, Security, and Layout. A pump station shall be:
(a) weatherproof,
(b) constructed and maintained to exclude animals;
(c) locked to prevent unauthorized entry and vandalism; and
(d) sized, configured, and equipped to allow for:
(i) operation and maintenance; and
(ii) installation and removal of pumps and other equipment.
(6) Heating. Heating shall be provided if needed:
(a) for the safe and efficient operation of equipment; and
(b) to prevent equipment from freezing.
(7) Lighting. Lighting shall be provided to allow for operation and maintenance of
equipment.
(8) Ventilation.
(a) Ventilation shall be provided for a pump station.
(b) Forced ventilation of at least six air-changes per hour shall be provided for a pump
station:
(i) in a confined space;
(ii) in a subsurface compartment or vault;
(iii) if an unsafe atmosphere may develop.
(9) Wet Wells. A Finished water wet well at a pump station shall:
(a) be waterproof;
(b) allow for the removal of water and sediment;
(c) be covered to protect the water from contamination; and
(d) have an access opening and a lid that meet the requirements for a water storage tank
in Section R309-545-14.
(10) Return of Used Water to the Drinking Water System Prohibited. Water withdrawn
from a public drinking water system for any use may not be returned to the system.
(11) Automatic and Remote-Controlled Stations.
(a) An automatically operated pump station shall have an automatic signaling apparatus
that immediately notifies a water system operator when the station is out of service.
(b) A remote-controlled pump station shall be:
(i) electrically operated and controlled; and
(ii) have an automatic signaling apparatus that immediately notifies a water system
operator when the station is out of service.

R309-540-6. Pumps.
(1) Capacity and Minimum Distribution System Pressure. A pump used to provide
minimum distribution system pressure shall:
(a) have the capacity to meet the maximum demand of the specific portion of the
distribution system served; and
(b) be capable of providing the minimum pressures required by Section R309-105-9.
(2) Number of Pumps.
(a) A water supplier shall have at least two pumps installed and in operation at a booster
pump facility that provides the only means available to meet the minimum distribution system
pressure requirements of Section R309-105-9 for the water distribution pipeline served by the
facility.
(b) A booster pump facility that requires at least two pumps shall meet the maximum
demand of the water distribution pipeline served by the facility with the largest pump out of
service.
(3) Booster Pumps.
(a) A booster pump shall be equipped with an automatic shutoff or low-pressure
controller as recommended by the pump manufacturer.
(b) A booster pump withdrawing water from a distribution line shall maintain an intake
pressure of at least 20 psi when the pump is in normal operation.
(c) A booster pump withdrawing water directly from a water storage tank shall be
provided with net positive suction head.
(4) Pump Motor. A pump motor shall:
(a) be sized to meet operating conditions without overloading; and
(b) provide the maximum horsepower required by the pump without the use of a service
factor.
(5) Certification of Drinking Water Treatment Chemicals and System Components.
(a) Chemicals added to drinking water at pump facilities shall be certified to meet
NSF/ANSI 60.
(b) Products, components, and materials used in pump facilities that may impart
chemical contaminants or impurities to drinking water shall be certified to meet NSF/ANSI 61.
(6) Suction Lift. When a pump provides suction lift:
(a) the . maximum lift shall be within the pump manufacturer's recommended limits; and
(b) tanks priming shall be provided for the pump.
(7) Priming.
(a) When a pump requires priming, the priming system shall:
(i) use water of at least the same quality as the water being pumped; and
(ii) include a means to prevent back siphoning.
(b) When an air-operated ejector is used for vacuum priming, it shall draw clean air
through a screened intake:
(i) at least ten feet above the ground; and
(ii) at least ten feet away from a point of contamination.
(8) Water Seal.
(a) Water used as a seal for a pump shall be of at least the same quality of the water
being pumped.
(b) A water line supplying drinking water used as a seal for a pump that pumps non-
potable water shall be protected from backflow.
(9) Individual Home Booster Pumps. Individual home booster pumps shall not be
allowed for any individual service from the public water supply main. Exceptions to the rule may
be granted by the Director if it can be shown that the granting of an exception will not jeopardize
public health.

R309-540-7 Pump Appurtenances.
(1) Valves.
(a) Valves shall be provided to allow satisfactory operation and maintenance of a pump
facility.
(b) Each pump shall have an isolation valve:
(i) on the intake side of the pump; and
(ii) on the discharge side of the pump.
(c) An air release valve shall:
(i) be provided where needed to allow the release of accumulated air in pump facility
piping; and
(ii) meet the requirements of Subsection R309-550-6(6).
(d) If used, a foot valve shall be sized according to the manufacturer's recommendation.
(2) Piping. Piping for a pump shall:
(a) have watertight joints; and
(b) be protected against surge or water hammer
(3) Controls. Controls for a pump shall:
(a) be protected from flooding;
(b) allow a pump motor to operate at rated capacity without overloading;
(c) have proper overload protection for the air temperature encountered;
(d) provide for alternate operation of pumps where two or more pumps are installed;
(e) prevent the pump motor from starting during pump backspin;
(f) set start and cutoff pressures to prevent continuous on-off cycling;
(g) follow manufacturer’s requirements for automatic cutoff pressure; and
(h) prevent surge pressures from activating controls that turn on pumps or other
equipment outside the normal design cycle of operation.
(4) Water Pre-Lubrication of Pump Bearings. If water is used for automatic pre-
lubrication of pump bearings, and an auxiliary direct-drive power supply is provided:
(a) the pre-lubrication line shall have a valved bypass around the automatic control so
that the bearings can be lubricated manually before the pump is started; or
(5) Pressure Measurement. A pump or group of pumps operating together shall have a
means of measuring pressure:
(a) on the discharge line; and
(b) on the intake line capable of indicating positive and negative pressure. (b) the pre-
lubrication controls shall be wired to the auxiliary power supply.
(6) Standby Power Supply.
(a) A community water system that relies solely on a pump facility to supply water to a
service area shall be provided with standby power, power using a permanent or portable
generator or electrical service from two independent substations.
(b) If a fuel-operated generator provides standby power:
(i) the water supply shall be protected from contamination from the fuel supply and fuel
line; and
(ii) a carbon monoxide detector shall be installed if the generator is located indoors.

R309-540-8. Hydropneumatic Facilities for Maintaining Distribution System Pressure.
(1) Applicability.
(a) Section R309-540-8 applies to a hydropneumatic facility that maintains distribution
system pressure for a public water system.
(b) Sections R309-540-5 through R309-540-7 apply to a pump, other than a well pump,
that supplies water under pressure to a hydropneumatic pressure tank.
(c) Section R309-540-8 applies to air-over-water, diaphragm, and bladder
hydropneumatic pressure tanks.
(d) Section R309-540-8 does not apply to:
(i) a surge protection tank;
(ii) pressure relief equipment; or
(iii) a pressure tank dedicated solely to fire suppression
(2) Number of Pumps. A public water system using a hydropneumatic facility to meet
the minimum distribution system pressure requirements of Section R309-105-9 shall have at
least two pumps installed and in operation at the hydropneumatic facility, unless the
hydropneumatic facility is supplied solely by a well pump.
(3) Pressure Tank Certification. A hydropneumatic pressure tank shall have:
(a) NSF/ANSI 61 certification; and
(b) ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code certification.
(4) Use of Pressure Tank Volume for Water Storage Sizing. A community water system
may not use the volume of a hydropneumatic pressure tank to meet the water storage sizing
requirements in Section R309-510-8.
(5) Pressure Tank Located Below Ground.
(a) A below-ground location for a hydropneumatic pressure tank and appurtenances shall
meet the requirements of:
(i) Subsection R309-540-5(2) for flood protection and site drainage;
(ii) Subsection R309-540-5(3) for pump station drainage and flooding prohibition;
(iii) Subsection R309-540-5(4)(b) for access; and
(iv) Subsection R309-540-5(8) for ventilation.
(b) Electrical controls for a hydropneumatic pressure tank located below ground shall be:
(i) located above grade; and
(ii) protected from flooding.
(6) Operating Pressure Measurement. A means to measure the operating pressures of a
hydropneumatic facility shall be provided.
(7) Bypass Piping. Each hydropneumatic tank shall have bypass piping and isolation
valves to allow the tank to be removed from service without disruption of water distribution.
(8) Pressure Tank Sizing. The minimum volume of a hydropneumatic tank shall be sized
to avoid continuous pump cycling as recommended by the manufacturer.
(9) Air-Over-Water Pressure Tanks.
(a) An air-over-water pressure tank shall have:
(i) an access opening;
(ii) a drain;
(iii) a means to measure pressure;
(iv) a means to measure the water level in the tank;
(v) an automatic or manual air blow-off;
(vi) a means for adding air; and
(vii) pressure operated start-stop controls for a pump.
(b) Air delivered by a compressor to an air-over-water pressure tank shall be:
(i) drawn from a point above ground;
(ii) free of contamination;
(iii) filtered; and
(iv) oil free.
(c) The volume of water remaining in an air-over-water pressure tank at the lowest
pressure setting shall provide a water seal at the water outlet to prevent the leakage of air.

KEY: drinking water, pumps, hydropneumatic systems, individual home booster pumps
Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: February 15, 2009
Notice of Continuation: March 12, 2020
Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-4-104
Agenda Item
8(A)
Net Federal SRF Grants: $240,270,701 Principal (P): $41,470,245 Total:$3,344,295 Total:$2,653,151
Total State Matches: $50,999,400 Interest (I): $25,898,165
Closed Loans: -$255,489,761 Total P & I:$67,368,410
Total Grant Dollars:$35,780,340
Total Federal State Revolving Fund: $106,493,045
Total Federal Hardship Fund: $2,653,151
Subtotal: $109,146,196
Less:
Authorized & Partially Disbursed Closed Loans: $149,741,417
Authorized Federal Hardship: $799,339
Subtotal: $150,540,756
Proposed Federal Project(s): $0
Proposed Federal Hardship Project(s): $0
Subtotal: $0
AS OF:-$43,248,372
$1,853,812
Total Balance of ALL Funds after deducting proposed actions: -$41,394,559
Projected Receipts thru January 31, 2025
2023 Fed SRF Supplemental and Base grant & State Match $0
2024 Fed SRF Supplemental Grant & State Match $19,666,900
Interest on Investments $1,314,000
Principal Payments $8,582,603
Interest on loans $782,409
Hardship & Technical Assistance fees $924,342
Fund 5215 principal & int payments $111,200
Total: $31,381,454
01/31/25 Total Estimated Federal SRF Funds Available through: 01/31/2025 -$10,013,106
See "DDW Cash Flow Forecast" file for additional information
Minimum Closed Subsidy Status
$2,200,200 $2,200,200 COMPLETE
$6,500,000 $4,223,002 INCOMPLETE
$2,200,200 $2,200,200
2021
Total:
$4,143,586
Receive 60% in January
2022
SRF Subsidization Requirements - Base & Supplemental Grants
Grant Year Maximum Authorized/Not Closed Subsidy
$5,390,490
$5,390,490
$12,640,606
$12,640,606
$12,250,000
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
FEDERAL SRF
as of January 31, 2024
1997 thru 2023 SRF Grants Principal Repayments Earnings on Invested Cash Balance
FEDERAL SECOND ROUND FUNDFIRST ROUND FUND
Hardship Fund
SUMMARY
TOTAL REMAINING HARDSHIP FUNDS:
TOTAL REMAINING LOAN FUNDS:January 31, 2024
PROPOSED
LESS
AUTHORIZED &
PARTIALLY
DISBURSED
2/15/2024 2:55 PM Federal SRF - STATUS REPORT - DWB Status Report
Total Project Terms Loan #Loan Forgiveness Total
Cornish Town - pws 03005 $ 1,704,922 0%, 30 yrs 3F1812 02-Nov-21 Feb 2024 $ 754,000 750,922$ 1,504,922$
Bristlecone - pws 09077 $ 93,500 100% PF 3F1822 11-Jan-22 now state grant -$
Skyline Mountain SSD - pws 20043 $ 3,123,000 2.09% HGA Fee 30yrs 3F1831 11-Jan-22 3,123,000$ 3,123,000$
M & J Trailer Home Community - pws 02078 $ 768,000 0%, 40 yrs 3F1848 16-May-23 $ 438,000 270,000$ $ 708,000
Ukon Water Co. $ 1,530,000 3F2002 16-May-23 1,530,000$ $ 1,530,000
Roosevelt City - pws 07004 $ 2,951,400 100% PF 3F1854 08-Jun-22 2,841,400$ 2,841,400$
Henefer Town - pws 22005 $ 2,100,000 1% HGA 30 yrs lof $21k 3F1843 07-Jun-22 2,100,000$ 2,100,000$
Henefer Town - pws 22005 (add'l funds) $ 6,573,000 1% HGA 30 yrs lof $21k 3F1843 16-May-23 $ 1,100,000 $ 1,100,000
Johnson WID - pws 07006 $ 2,452,000 100% PF 3F1862 21-Jul-22 $ 2,352,000 $ 2,352,000
Holden Town - pws 14013 $ 8,841,000 0%, 40 yrs 3F1847 21-Jul-22 $ 5,191,000 $ 3,100,000 $ 8,291,000
San Juan County - NTUA Westwater #2 - PWS 19000 $ 4,355,105 100% PF 3F1821P 11-Jan-22 457,000$ 457,000$
San Juan County La Sal pws 19000 $ 60,000 100% PF 3F1871P 07-Jun-22 60,000$ 60,000$
Brian Head Town - PWS 11001 $ 1,761,920 0%, 40 yrs 3F1861 16-May-23 $ 632,000 271,934$ $ 903,934
Brian Head Town - PWS 11001 $ 6,769,206 0%, 40 yrs 3F1910 16-May-23 $ 3,838,000 1,645,748$ $ 5,483,748
Wallsburg Town - pws 26009 $ 6,933,000 0%, 40 yrs 3F1889 31-Aug-22 $ 3,433,000 $ 3,261,000 $ 6,694,000
Leeds Domestic Users Assn - pws
27010 $ 7,797,500 0%, 40 yrs; refi existing $273K loan 3F1892 31-Aug-22 Feb 2024 $ 4,293,000 $ 3,009,500 $ 7,302,500
Hanna Water & Sewer ID - pws 07062 $ 3,483,838 0%, 40 yrs 3F1883 31-Aug-22 $ 860,000 $ 2,623,838 $ 3,483,838
Ballard WID - pws 24001 $ 7,287,000 0%, 40 yrs 3F1896 31-Aug-22 $ 3,600,000 $ 3,050,000 $ 6,650,000
Ballard (design advance + test well)3F1896 07-Nov-23 $ 450,000 $ 450,000
Timber Lakes Water SSD - pws 26057 $ 3,295,630 0%, 40 yrs 3F1877 31-Aug-22 $ 3,263,000 $ 3,263,000
Upper Whittemore Water Co-PWS 25136 $ 500,000 0%, 20 yrs 3F1900 01-Nov-22 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 500,000
Wilson Arch Wtr & Swr Co PWS 19069 $ 1,138,000 0% int/hgf 30 yrs 3F1904 01-Nov-22 $ 569,000 $ 569,000 $ 1,138,000
South Duchesne Culinary Water - PWS
07067 $ 1,992,500 2%, 30 yrs 3F1879A 21-Jul-22 -$ 482,000$
Hidden Lake Assn - PWS 22029 $ 3,838,040 0%, 40 yrs 3F1911 10-Jan-23 $ 3,838,040 $ 3,838,040
Ogden City - PWS 29011 $ 87,000,000 1% 30 years 3F1908 10-Jan-23 $ 34,370,000 $ 34,370,000
Virgin Town - PWS 27020 $ 3,470,489 0%, 40 yrs 3F1909 16-May-23 $ 2,140,000 930,489$ $ 3,070,489
Paragonah $ 7,452,100 0%, 40 yrs 3F1913 16-May-23 $ 5,110,000 1,890,000$ $ 7,000,000
Green River (see Emerging Contam. tab for P/F) $ 5,575,000 3.16%, 30 yrs 3F1925E 16-May-23 $ 2,045,000 $ 2,045,000
Spring City $ 5,932,000 1%, 40 yrs 3F1926 16-May-23 $ 4,338,000 1,494,000$ $ 5,832,000
Stockton Town (Add'l $$ & Design Advance)1%, 40 yrs 3F1928 27-Jun-23 $ 2,240,000 960,000$ $ 3,200,000
Green Hills Estates WSID $ 2,067,000 1%, 30 yrs 3F1930E 16-May-23 $ 926,000 1,121,000$ $ 2,047,000
Genola (add'l funds & refinance 1732)2,849,400$ 0%, 40yrs 3F2001 16-May-23 $ 265,000 $ 265,000 $ 530,000
Payson City - Christian Life Assembly 343,000 100% PF 3F2003 27-Jun-23 $ - $ 343,000 $ 343,000
Irontown - new project, Additional $106,100 0%, 30 yrs 3F2015 30-Aug-23 1/29/2024 $ 85,000 $ 21,100 $ 106,100
Fremont Waterworks Company 1,425,000 1%, 30 yrs 3F2016 30-Aug-23 $ 997,000 $ 428,000 $ 1,425,000
Foothill Water Users Assoc - $ 603,030 0%, 40yrs 3F2006 07-Nov-23 $ 422,000 $ 181,030 $ 603,030
Holiday Hills HOA $ 250,000 0%, 20yrs 07-Nov-23 $ 175,000 $ 75,000 $ 250,000
$ 90,395,040 $ 34,200,961 $ 124,596,001 $ 482,000
Date Closed Loan PF Fund 5215
-$ $ -
Rural Water Assn of Utah 676,000$ 5 yr contract for Development SpecialistOngoing 07-Jan-18 6/5/2018 -$ $ 2,600
Rural Water Assn of Utah CONTRACT # 21-6428
Hyde Park City 5,994,000$ 2.91% HGF 20 yrs 3F1744 14-Jan-20 4/15/2021 1,500,000$ 1,500,000$
Bicknell 2,278,000$ 1% 30 yrs HGA?3F1786 08-Jun-21 8/18/2022 408,000$ 270,000$ 678,000$
East Carbon City - pws 04012 5,099,000$ 1% int/hgf 30 yrs (increased pf amount)3F1792 01-Nov-22 3/30/2023 $ 650,000 $ 650,000 $ 1,300,000
Blanding City - West Water PWS 19001 40,000$ 100% PF 3F1816P 22-Sep-21 3/29/2022 $ 4,503
Cornish Town - pws 03005 40,000$ 100% PF 3F1826P 22-Nov-21 1/18/2022 $ 40,000
High Valley Water Company - pws 22021 0%, 30 yrs 3F1835 03-Mar-22 6/6/2023 755,000$ 754,000$ 1,509,000$
High Valley Water Company - pws 22021 4,009,000$ 0%, 30 yrs (add'l funds for longer term?)3F1835 16-May-23 6/6/2023 $ 350,000 350,000$ $ 700,000
Timber Lakes Water SSD - pws 26057 40,000$ 100% PF 3F1840P 25-Feb-22 4/14/2022 $ 19,584
Pine Valley Mt Farms - pws 27061 12,000$ 100% PF 3F1868P 18-Jul-22 8/15/2022 $ 520
Panguitch City - pws 09007 $ 1,629,000 50/50 2.0% 20 yrs HGA 3F1855 09-Jun-22 8/10/2023 423,000$ 423,000$ 846,000$
Granger-Hunter Improve District - pws 1800713,811,820$ .5% hga fee 30 yrs 3F1850 21-Jul-22 5/9/2023 $ 9,480,000 $ 2,432,620 $ 11,912,620
Ouray Park WID 40,000$ 100% PF 3F1865P 31-Aug-22 6/12/2023 20$ 20$
Beaver City - pws 01001 $ 2,829,146 0%, 40 yrs 3F1874 21-Jul-22 8/17/2023 $ 797,000 $ 805,620 $ 1,602,620
Pine Valley Mt Farms - pws 27061 700,000$ 100% PF 3F1890 31-Aug-22 4/4/2023 $ 630,015 $ 630,015
Leeds Domestic Users Assn - pws 27010 -$ planning advance 100% pf 3F1892 31-Aug-22 5/17/2023 $ - $ -
Beaver Dam Village SSD $ 32,900 100% PF 3F1921P 18-Apr-23 5/23/2023 $ - $ 16,642
Paragonah (advance) $ 300,000 0%, 40 yrs 3F1913 16-May-23 9/11/2023 300,000$ $ 300,000
Spring City P/F planning/design Advance 3F1926 16-May-23 6/12/2023 -$ $ -
Wales Town $ 80,000 100% PF 3F1929 16-May-23 7/3/2023 3,406$ $ 3,406
Henrieville Town $ 49,000 100% PF 3F1914P 25-May-23 6/20/2023 $ - $ 44,000
Price Municipal Corporation $ 85,890 100% PF 3F2000P 14-Jun-23 7/3/2023 $ - $ 85,890
Highlands Water Company $ 40,000 0%, 5 years 3F1917P 15-Jun-23 7/3/2023 40,000$ $ 40,000
Big Plains Water SSD $ 35,200 100% PF 3F2007P 20-Jun-23 7/5/2023 $ 35,200 $ 35,200
Hinckley Town $ 39,000 100% PF 3F1999P 14-Jun-23 7/11/2023 $ 39,000
Weber Meadowview Ranch - pws 22009 $ 2,258,400 0%, 40 yrs 3F1815 18-Nov-21 7/19/2023 $ 560,000 560,000$
Bridgerland Village Water Co - pws 17001 $ 1,350,000 1.7% 30yrs LOF $13,500 3F1837 03-Mar-22 7/26/2023 1,350,000$ 1,350,000$
Wanship Mutual Water Company $ 61,500 0%, 5 years 3F1916P 23-Jan-23 9/12/2023 37,485$ 37,485$
LaVerkin City $ 64,600 100% PF 3F2012P 10-Aug-23 10/2/2023 -$ $ 64,600
Wallsburg Town - pws 26009 $ 239,000 planning advance 100% pf 3F1889 31-Aug-22 10/2/2023 $ - $ -
Neola Water & Sewer District $ 75,000 100% PF 3F1918P 14-Jun-23 10/2/2023 $ 75,000 $ 75,000
Levan Town - pws 12001 $ 2,895,000 2%, 30 yrs 3F1856 21-Jul-22 11/6/2023 1,033,000$ 1,033,050$ 2,066,050$
$ -
$ 17,383,485 $ 7,761,931 $ 25,145,416 $ 317,339
$ 149,741,417 $ 799,339
AVAILABLE PROJECT FUNDS:(43,248,372)$
Legend: Items newer than 11/30/2023 or needing resolution highlighted yellow = AVAILABLE HARDSHIP FUNDS:1,853,812$
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
FEDERAL STATE REVOVING FUND
PROJECTS AUTHORIZED BUT NOT YET CLOSED
as of January 31, 2024
Hardship Fund
5215
Authorized From Fund 5210
(1st or 2nd Round)PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM Project Closing Date
Scheduled or
Estimated
Authorized
Date
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION & PLANNING:
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED:
TOTAL PLANNING AUTHORIZED:
COMMITTED ADVANCES / AGREEMENTS or PARTIALLY DISBURSED CLOSED 2ND ROUND AGREEMENTS:
FY21 ARPA Appropriation: $25,000,000
FY22 ARPA Appropriation: $21,500,000
Subtotal: $46,500,000
Less:
Authorized Grants & Closed Grants in Construction: $46,020,616
Subtotal: $46,020,616
Total available after Authorized deducted $479,384
Proposed Loan Project(s):$0
Subtotal:$0
AS OF:
$479,384
Total Balance of Funds:$479,384
Projected Receipts Next Twelve Months:
FY2023 Appropriation and Federal Funding
Total Projections $0
January 31, 2025 Total Estimated ARPA Funds Available through 01-31-2025 $479,384
LESS AUTHORIZED (see Page 2 for
details)
PROPOSED (see Page 2 for
details)
January 31, 2024 TOTAL REMAINING ARPA GRANT FUNDS:
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
ARPA Grant FUNDS
AS OF January 31, 2024
SUMMARY
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
ARPA Grant FUNDS
PROJECTS AUTHORIZED
AS OF January 31, 2024
Date Date Signed/
Community Grant # Authorized Closed/Anticipated Grant Total
Brian Head Town - PWS 11001 3F1861 Jun-22 507,870 507,870
Austin SSD - PWS 21003 3S1803 Jun-22 2,269,000 2,269,000
Desert Sage HOA - PWS 24051 3F1859 Jun-22 578,460 578,460
South Duchesne Culinary Water - PWS 07067 3F1879 Jul-22 1,500,500 1,500,500
North Emery SSD - pws 08007 3S1863 Jun-22 14-Feb-24 1,538,000 1,538,000
Cedarview Montwell SSD - PWS 07072 3S1869 Jul-22 3,324,000 3,324,000
Helper - PWS 04004 3F1880 Aug-22 3,016,000 3,016,000
Bicknell Town - emergency spring line repairs 3F2019A Aug-23 100,000 100,000
0
Subtotal Loans and Grants Authorized 12,833,830 12,833,830
COMMITTED GRANT AGREEMENTS W/ CONSTRUCTION IN PROCESS
Church Wells SSD - PWS 13002 3F1824 Jan-22 13-Apr-22 2,252,000 2,252,000
Circleville Town - PWS 16002 3S1825 Jan-22 11-Jul-23 3,500,000 3,500,000
Tridell Lapoint SSD - PWS 24009 3S1836 Mar-22 30-Mar-23 3,500,000 3,500,000
Cannonville Town - PWS 09003 3F1838 Mar-22 01-Jul-22 2,360,676 2,360,676
Pinion Forrest SSD - PWS 07073 3F1844 Jun-22 16-Nov-23 299,000 299,000
Axtell Community Service Dist - PWS 20051 3F1845 Jun-22 11-Oct-22 3,255,110 3,255,110
Kane Co WCD - New Paria Subdivision -PWS 13037 3F1852 Jun-22 14-Oct-22 3,359,000 3,379,000
Kane Co WCD - Clark Bench Wtr Co - PWS 13060 3F1853 Jun-22 01-Nov-22 3,444,000 3,464,000
Daggett Co - Dutch John - PWS 05001 planning advance 3F1857 Jun-22 16-Mar-23 135,000 135,000
Daggett Co - Dutch John - PWS 05001 3F1857 Jun-22 06-Nov-23 3,365,000 3,365,000
Escalante City - 09004 - redevelop spring, emergency 3F1860 Jun-22 29-Jul-22 40,000 40,000
Myton City - pws 07002 3S1864 Jun-22 22-Nov-22 650,000 650,000
Ouray Park WID - PWS 24014 3F1866A Jun-22 16-Mar-23 2,871,000 2,871,000
Cedarview Montwell SSD - planning advance PWS 07072 3S1869 Jul-22 21-Sep-22 176,000 176,000
Helper - PWS 04004 planning advance 3F1880 Mar-23 17-Mar-23 400,000 400,000
Blanding - West Water Community - PWS 19001 3F1897 Aug-22 19-Sep-23 3,500,000 3,500,000
Echo Mutual Water Co - emergency 3F1907 Oct-22 13-Feb-23 40,000 40,000
Thompson SSD - 10004 - emergency, flooding 3F1919 Sep-22 17-Jan-23 40,000 40,000
TOTAL AUTHORIZED Grant/OR CLOSED; Some are Partially FUNDED $46,020,616 $46,060,616
PROPOSED PROJECTS FOR NOVEMBER 2023
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Proposed Projects 0 0
Fund 5215
FY22 ARPA Appropriation:$3,500,000
Subtotal:$3,500,000
Less:
Authorized Grants & Closed Grants in Construction:$2,965,462
Subtotal:$2,965,462
Total available after Authorized deducted $534,538
Proposed Loan Project(s):$0
Subtotal:$0
AS OF:
$534,538
Total Balance of Funds:$534,538
Projected Receipts Next Twelve Months:
FY2023 Appropriation and Federal Funding
Total Projections $0
January 31, 2025 Total Estimated ARPA Funds Available through 01-31-2025 $534,538
LESS AUTHORIZED (see Page 2 for
details)
PROPOSED (see Page 2 for
details)
January 31, 2024 TOTAL REMAINING ARPA GRANT FUNDS:
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
LEAD ARPA Grant FUNDS
AS OF January 31, 2024
SUMMARY
Date Date
Community Grant # Authorized Closed/Anticipated Grant Total
Alpine School District 304,816.18 304,816
Cache District 86,177.92 86,178
Canyons District 199,999.68 200,000
Carbon District 31,874.03 31,874
ChemTech-Ford Laboratories 236194 Jan-23 Jan-23 1,150,000 1,150,000
Cocoon Daycare 393.51 394
Creekside Kids Park City 393.51 394
Davis District 208,141.79 208,142
Emery District 232009 Feb-23 Feb-23 37,776.62 37,777
Grand District 1,500.00 1,500
Iron District 103,413.51 103,414
Just For Kids Adventures 3,000.00 3,000
Kane District 8,307.36 8,307
Little Orchard Preschool 1,574.03 1,574
Logan City District 28,857.14 28,857
Morgan District 11,411.69 11,412
Our Lady of Lourdes 393.51 394
Salt Lake District 176,990.48 176,990
Smart Start Learning Center 9,837.66 9,838
South Summit District 232010 Apr-23 Apr-23 73,192.21 73,192
Time for Families 1,967.53 1,968
Tooele District 30,431.17 30,431
Uintah District 232011 Apr-23 Apr-23 11,936.36 11,936
Utah Catholic Schools 9,050.65 9,051
Utah Community Action 16,133.77 16,134
Washington District 23,684.64 23,685
Weber District 425,206.64 425,207
Lollipops 3,000.00 3,000
Progressive Preschool 3,000.00 3,000
Thomas Edison 1,500.00 1,500
Wee Friends Preschool 1,500.00 1,500
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Subtotal Loans and Grants Authorized 2,965,461.59 2,965,461.59
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
TOTAL AUTHORIZED Grant/OR CLOSED BUT NOT YET FUNDED 2,965,461.59 2,965,461.59
Total Proposed Projects
GRANTS IN PROCESS
PROPOSED PROJECTS FOR NOVEMBER 2023
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
LEAD ARPA Grant FUNDS
PROJECTS AUTHORIZED BUT NOT YET CLOSED
AS OF January 31, 2024
FY22 LSL Grant Loan Portion $26,248,000
Subtotal: $26,248,000
Less:
Authorized Grants & Closed Grants and Loans: $5,862,600
Subtotal: $5,862,600
Total available after Authorized deducted $20,385,400
Proposed Loan Project(s):$39,525,000
Subtotal:$39,525,000
AS OF:
-$19,139,600
Total Balance of Funds:-$19,139,600
Projected Receipts Next Twelve Months:
FY2023 Appropriation and Federal Funding
Total Projections $26,248,000
January 31, 2025 Total Estimated LSLR Funds Available through 01-31-2025 $7,108,400
PROPOSED (see Page 2 for
details)
January 31, 2024 TOTAL REMAINING LSLR LOAN/GRANT FUNDS:
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
Lead Service Line Grant Funds
as of January 31, 2024
SUMMARY
LESS AUTHORIZED (see Page 2 for
details)
As Of: 1/31/2024
Community Grant #
Date
Authorized
Date Agreement
Executed Loan Grant & P/F Total
Subtotal Construction Loans and Grants Authorized $0 $0 $0
Marysvale Town 3F1931PL 23-Apr-23 12-Jun-23 100,000$ 100,000
South Salt Lake Water System 3F1933PL 13-Apr-23 20-Jun-23 100,000$ 100,000
Corinne City Corp 3F1939PL 21-Jul-23 31-Aug-23 100,000$ 100,000
LaVerkin City 3F1948PL 18-Jul-23 31-Aug-23 100,000$ 100,000
Orderville Town 3F1950PL 25-Apr-23 31-Jul-23 87,000$ 87,000
Antimony Town 3F1951PL 03-Jul-23 14-Aug-23 37,000$ 37,000
Tridell Lapoint Water Improvement District 3F1957PL 25-Apr-23 25-Jul-23 100,000$ 100,000
Escalante City Water System 3F1958PL 12-May-23 03-Jul-23 41,000$ 41,000
Daggett Co-Dutch John Town 3F1959PL 18-Jul-23 31-Jul-23 80,000$ 80,000
Joseph Municipal Water System 3F1960PL 21-Jul-23 31-Jul-23 36,000$ 36,000
Cedar City Waterworks 3F1961PL 28-Apr-23 11-Jul-23 100,000$ 100,000
Neola Water & Sewer District 3F1963PL 18-Jul-23 15-Aug-23 100,000$ 100,000
Fremont Water Works 3F1964PL 21-Jul-23 31-Jul-23 88,000$ 88,000
Rockville Pipeline Company 3F1966PL 21-Jul-23 11-Sep-23 69,000$ 69,000
Ballard Water Improvement District 3F1970PL 20-Jul-23 11-Sep-23 85,000$ 85,000
Kearns Improvement District 3F1972PL 03-May-23 06-Jul-23 100,000$ 100,000
Magna Water District.3F1973PL 05-May-23 17-Jul-23 100,000$ 100,000
Granger-Hunter Improvement District 3F1975PL 03-May-23 03-Jul-23 100,000$ 100,000
City of Moab 3F1977PL 15-May-23 12-Jun-23 100,000$ 100,000
Green River City 3F1978PL 12-May-23 31-Jul-23 96,000$ 96,000
Cedarview Montwell SSD 3F1979PL 25-Jul-23 15-Aug-23 100,000$ 100,000
Wellington City 3F1981PL 22-May-23 31-Aug-23 100,000$ 100,000
Jensen Water Improvement District 3F1988PL 21-Jul-23 11-Sep-23 96,000$ 96,000
Sandy City - amended 3F1991PL 03-May-23 31-Aug-23 100,000$ 100,000
Holden Town Water System 3F1992PL 04-Aug-23 15-Aug-23 73,000$ 73,000
Price Municipal Corporation 3F1996PL 25-Jul-23 31-Aug-23 100,000$ 100,000
Kane County Water Conservancy District 3F2008PL 27-Jun-23 25-Jul-23 389,300$ 389,300
Cannonville Town 3F2011PL 25-Jul-23 31-Aug-23 78,000$ 78,000
Circleville Town Water System 3F1945PL 03-Jul-23 19-Jul-23 83,000$ 83,000
West Corinne Water Company 3F1983PL 20-Jul-23 19-Jul-23 60,000$ 60,000
Springdale Town Water System 3F1965PL 20-Jul-23 02-Oct-23 94,000$ 94,000
Church Wells Special Service District 3F1943P 21-Jul-23 02-Oct-23 37,000$ 37,000
Myton City 3F1980P 18-Jun-23 02-Oct-23 100,000$ 100,000
Junction Town 3F1942P 03-Jul-23 04-Oct-23 53,000$ 53,000
Provo City 3F1934P 13-Jun-23 18-Oct-23 100,000$ 100,000
City of Logan 3F1997P 05-May-23 100,000$ 100,000
North Village Special Service District 3F1953P Jul-23 Jan-24 $ 8,300 8,300
Jordanelle Special Service District 3F1954P Jul-23 Jan-24 $ 15,500 15,500
Twin Creeks Special Service District 3F1955P Jul-23 Jan-24 $ 17,500 17,500
Charleston Water Conservancy District 3F1967P Jul-23 Feb-24 $ 25,000 25,000
Cedar Fort W.S.3F1945P Jul-23 $ 35,000 35,000
Lyman W.S.3F1941P Jul-23 72,000$ 72,000
Axtell Community Special Service District 3F1989P Jul-23 75,000$ 75,000
Glen Canyon Special Service District 3F1976P Jul-23 Jan-24 78,000$ 78,000
Panguitch City 3F1962P Jul-23 Dec-23 $86,000 86,000
Milford W.S.3F1998P May-23 Jan-24 90,000$ 90,000
Lead Service Line Grant Funds
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
Fund 5210
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AUTHORIZED, NOT CLOSED
PLANNING PROJECTS AUTHORIZED, IN PROCESS
Torrey Town W.S.3F1944P Jul-23 Jan-24 91,000$ 91,000
Ouray Park Water Improvement District 3F1969P Jul-23 Jan-24 93,000$ 93,000
Brian Head Town 3F2010P Jul-23 $99,000 99,000
Helper Municipal 3F1935P Apr-23 Jan-24 $100,000 100,000
Salt Lake City 3F1972P Apr-23 $100,000 100,000
Moroni City 3F1990P May-23 Jan-24 100,000$ 100,000
Gunnison City 3F1946P Apr-23 Jan-24 100,000$ 100,000
City of St. George 3F1986P May-23 Feb-24 100,000$ 100,000
Sunset City W.S.3F1994P May-23 Feb-24 100,000$ 100,000
East Carbon and Sunnyside 3F1995P Jul-23 100,000$ 100,000
Johnson Water Improvement District 3F1956P Jul-23 100,000$ 100,000
Sigurd Town 3F1940P Aug-23 Oct-23 70,000$ 70,000
Green Hills Country Estates Water Sewer
Improvement District 3F1985P Aug-23 Dec-23 70,000$ 70,000
Scipio Town 3F1932P Aug-23 $98,000 98,000
Salina City 3F1971P Aug-23 $100,000 100,000
Manti City 3F1952P Aug-23 Jan-24 $100,000 100,000
Wellsville City 3F1982P Aug-23 $110,000 110,000
Highland City 3F1936P Aug-23 $110,000 110,000
Boulder Farmstead Water Company 3F1923P Jun-23 Nov-23 37,000$ 37,000
Midvale City 3F2020P Nov-23 Jan-24 100,000$ 100,000
0
Subtotal Planning Loans and Grants Authorized $318,000 $5,444,600 $5,762,600
Community Grant #
Date
Authorized
Date Agreement
Executed
Funds Pending Fund
Dispursed Total Funds
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Subtotal Grants and Loans Partially Disbursed -$ $0 $0
TOTALS
Total Authorized Not Closed $5,762,600
Total Closed Partially Dispursed $0
Pending Dispursment Total -$
Total Proposed Projects 39,525,000.00$
Total Closed Current FY $100,000
Salt Lake City DPU 20,175,000 19,350,000 39,525,000
0
0
0
0
0
Total Proposed Projects 20,175,000 19,350,000 39,525,000
CLOSED PROJECTS PARTIALLY DISBURSED
PROPOSED PROJECTS FOR JANUARY 2023
FY22 EC Grant (excludes set-asides): $6,797,600
Subtotal: $6,797,600
Less:
Authorized Grants & Closed Grants in Construction: $6,530,000
Subtotal: $6,530,000
Total available after Authorized deducted $267,600
Proposed Loan Project(s):$0
Subtotal:$0
AS OF:
$267,600
Total Balance of Funds:$267,600
Projected Receipts Next Twelve Months:
FY2023 Appropriation and Federal Funding
Total Projections $6,800,000
January 31, 2025 Total Estimated EC Funds Available through 01-31-2025 $7,067,600
PROPOSED (see Page 2 for
details)
January 31, 2024 TOTAL REMAINING EC GRANT FUNDS:
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
Emerging Contaminants Grant Funds
as of January 31, 2024
SUMMARY
LESS AUTHORIZED (see Page 2 for
details)
As Of: 1/31/2024
Date Date Signed/
Community Grant # Authorized Closed/Anticipated Grant Total
Green River (for loan see SRF Commitments tab)3F1925E 16-May-23 3,530,000$ 3,530,000
Green Hills WSID (for loan see SRF Commits tab)3F1930E 16-May-23 22-Dec-23 500,000$ 500,000
Granger-Hunter ID 3F2017E 30-Aug-23 20-Dec-23 2,500,000$ 2,500,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Subtotal Loans and Grants Authorized 6,530,000 6,530,000
TOTAL AUTHORIZED Grant/OR CLOSED; Some are Partially FUNDED $6,530,000 $6,530,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Proposed Projects 0 0
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
PROJECTS AUTHORIZED BUT NOT YET CLOSED
Emerging Contaminants Grant Funds
Fund 2510
COMMITTED GRANT AGREEMENTS W/ CONSTRUCTION IN PROCESS
PROPOSED PROJECTS FOR JANUARY 2023
Loan
Funds Hardship
1st Round Principal Interest Fund TOTAL
Federal Capitalization Grants and State 20% match $291,270,101
Earnings on Invested 1st Round Funds 3,344,295
Repayments (including interest earnings on 2nd round receipts) 41,470,245 25,898,165 2,653,151 364,635,957
Less:
Closed loans and grants -255,489,761 -255,489,761
SUBTOTAL of Funds Available $35,780,340 $41,470,245 $29,242,460 $2,653,151 $109,146,196
Loans & Grants authorized but not yet closed or fully disbursed -121,816,001 -20,163,485 -7,761,931 -799,339 -150,540,756
SUBTOTAL of Funds Available less Authorized -$86,035,661 $21,306,760 $21,480,530 $1,853,812 -$41,429,759
Future Estimates:
Proposed Loans/Grants for current board package 0 0 0
SUBTOTAL of Funds Available less Proposed Loans & Grants -$86,035,661 $21,306,760 $21,480,530 $1,853,812 -$41,429,759
PROJECTIONS THRU January-2025
2023 BIL Supplemental & Match
2023 FED Base SRF Grant & State Match 0
2024 BIL Supplemental & Match 19,666,900
Projected repayments & revenue during the next twelve months 8,693,803 782,409 924,342 10,400,554
Projected annual investment earnings on invested cash balance 1,200,000 84,000 30,000 1,314,000
TOTAL -$66,368,761 $31,200,562 $22,346,939 $2,808,154 -$10,048,306
2nd Round
Loan Payments
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
FEDERAL SRF LOAN FUNDS
as of January 31, 2024
2/15/2024 2:55 PM Federal SRF - STATUS REPORT - SRF Available Cash
Total Project Terms Loan #Loan Forgiveness Total
Cornish Town - pws 03005 $ 1,704,922 0%, 30 yrs 3F1812 02-Nov-21 Feb 2024 $ 754,000 750,922$ 1,504,922$
Bristlecone - pws 09077 $ 93,500 100% PF 3F1822 11-Jan-22 now state grant -$
Skyline Mountain SSD - pws 20043 $ 3,123,000 2.09% HGA Fee 30yrs 3F1831 11-Jan-22 3,123,000$ 3,123,000$
M & J Trailer Home Community - pws 02078 $ 768,000 0%, 40 yrs 3F1848 16-May-23 $ 438,000 270,000$ $ 708,000
Ukon Water Co. $ 1,530,000 3F2002 16-May-23 1,530,000$ $ 1,530,000
Roosevelt City - pws 07004 $ 2,951,400 100% PF 3F1854 08-Jun-22 2,841,400$ 2,841,400$
Henefer Town - pws 22005 $ 2,100,000 1% HGA 30 yrs lof $21k 3F1843 07-Jun-22 2,100,000$ 2,100,000$
Henefer Town - pws 22005 (add'l funds) $ 6,573,000 1% HGA 30 yrs lof $21k 3F1843 16-May-23 $ 1,100,000 $ 1,100,000
Johnson WID - pws 07006 $ 2,452,000 100% PF 3F1862 21-Jul-22 $ 2,352,000 $ 2,352,000
Holden Town - pws 14013 $ 8,841,000 0%, 40 yrs 3F1847 21-Jul-22 $ 5,191,000 $ 3,100,000 $ 8,291,000
San Juan County - NTUA Westwater #2 - PWS 19000 $ 4,355,105 100% PF 3F1821P 11-Jan-22 457,000$ 457,000$
San Juan County La Sal pws 19000 $ 60,000 100% PF 3F1871P 07-Jun-22 60,000$ 60,000$
Brian Head Town - PWS 11001 $ 1,761,920 0%, 40 yrs 3F1861 16-May-23 $ 632,000 271,934$ $ 903,934
Brian Head Town - PWS 11001 $ 6,769,206 0%, 40 yrs 3F1910 16-May-23 $ 3,838,000 1,645,748$ $ 5,483,748
Wallsburg Town - pws 26009 $ 6,933,000 0%, 40 yrs 3F1889 31-Aug-22 $ 3,433,000 $ 3,261,000 $ 6,694,000
Leeds Domestic Users Assn - pws
27010 $ 7,797,500 0%, 40 yrs; refi existing $273K loan 3F1892 31-Aug-22 Feb 2024 $ 4,293,000 $ 3,009,500 $ 7,302,500
Hanna Water & Sewer ID - pws 07062 $ 3,483,838 0%, 40 yrs 3F1883 31-Aug-22 $ 860,000 $ 2,623,838 $ 3,483,838
Ballard WID - pws 24001 $ 7,287,000 0%, 40 yrs 3F1896 31-Aug-22 $ 3,600,000 $ 3,050,000 $ 6,650,000
Ballard (design advance + test well)3F1896 07-Nov-23 $ 450,000 $ 450,000
Timber Lakes Water SSD - pws 26057 $ 3,295,630 0%, 40 yrs 3F1877 31-Aug-22 $ 3,263,000 $ 3,263,000
Upper Whittemore Water Co-PWS 25136 $ 500,000 0%, 20 yrs 3F1900 01-Nov-22 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 500,000
Wilson Arch Wtr & Swr Co PWS 19069 $ 1,138,000 0% int/hgf 30 yrs 3F1904 01-Nov-22 $ 569,000 $ 569,000 $ 1,138,000
South Duchesne Culinary Water - PWS
07067 $ 1,992,500 2%, 30 yrs 3F1879A 21-Jul-22 -$ 482,000$
Hidden Lake Assn - PWS 22029 $ 3,838,040 0%, 40 yrs 3F1911 10-Jan-23 $ 3,838,040 $ 3,838,040
Ogden City - PWS 29011 $ 87,000,000 1% 30 years 3F1908 10-Jan-23 $ 34,370,000 $ 34,370,000
Virgin Town - PWS 27020 $ 3,470,489 0%, 40 yrs 3F1909 16-May-23 $ 2,140,000 930,489$ $ 3,070,489
Paragonah $ 7,452,100 0%, 40 yrs 3F1913 16-May-23 $ 5,110,000 1,890,000$ $ 7,000,000
Green River (see Emerging Contam. tab for P/F) $ 5,575,000 3.16%, 30 yrs 3F1925E 16-May-23 $ 2,045,000 $ 2,045,000
Spring City $ 5,932,000 1%, 40 yrs 3F1926 16-May-23 $ 4,338,000 1,494,000$ $ 5,832,000
Stockton Town (Add'l $$ & Design Advance)1%, 40 yrs 3F1928 27-Jun-23 $ 2,240,000 960,000$ $ 3,200,000
Green Hills Estates WSID $ 2,067,000 1%, 30 yrs 3F1930E 16-May-23 $ 926,000 1,121,000$ $ 2,047,000
Genola (add'l funds & refinance 1732)2,849,400$ 0%, 40yrs 3F2001 16-May-23 $ 265,000 $ 265,000 $ 530,000
Payson City - Christian Life Assembly 343,000 100% PF 3F2003 27-Jun-23 $ - $ 343,000 $ 343,000
Irontown - new project, Additional $106,100 0%, 30 yrs 3F2015 30-Aug-23 1/29/2024 $ 85,000 $ 21,100 $ 106,100
Fremont Waterworks Company 1,425,000 1%, 30 yrs 3F2016 30-Aug-23 $ 997,000 $ 428,000 $ 1,425,000
Foothill Water Users Assoc - $ 603,030 0%, 40yrs 3F2006 07-Nov-23 $ 422,000 $ 181,030 $ 603,030
Holiday Hills HOA $ 250,000 0%, 20yrs 07-Nov-23 $ 175,000 $ 75,000 $ 250,000
$ 90,395,040 $ 34,200,961 $ 124,596,001 $ 482,000
Date Closed Loan PF Fund 5215
-$ $ -
Rural Water Assn of Utah 676,000$ 5 yr contract for Development SpecialistOngoing 07-Jan-18 6/5/2018 -$ $ 2,600
Rural Water Assn of Utah CONTRACT # 21-6428
Hyde Park City 5,994,000$ 2.91% HGF 20 yrs 3F1744 14-Jan-20 4/15/2021 1,500,000$ 1,500,000$
Bicknell 2,278,000$ 1% 30 yrs HGA?3F1786 08-Jun-21 8/18/2022 408,000$ 270,000$ 678,000$
East Carbon City - pws 04012 5,099,000$ 1% int/hgf 30 yrs (increased pf amount)3F1792 01-Nov-22 3/30/2023 $ 650,000 $ 650,000 $ 1,300,000
Blanding City - West Water PWS 19001 40,000$ 100% PF 3F1816P 22-Sep-21 3/29/2022 $ 4,503
Cornish Town - pws 03005 40,000$ 100% PF 3F1826P 22-Nov-21 1/18/2022 $ 40,000
High Valley Water Company - pws 22021 0%, 30 yrs 3F1835 03-Mar-22 6/6/2023 755,000$ 754,000$ 1,509,000$
High Valley Water Company - pws 22021 4,009,000$ 0%, 30 yrs (add'l funds for longer term?)3F1835 16-May-23 6/6/2023 $ 350,000 350,000$ $ 700,000
Timber Lakes Water SSD - pws 26057 40,000$ 100% PF 3F1840P 25-Feb-22 4/14/2022 $ 19,584
Pine Valley Mt Farms - pws 27061 12,000$ 100% PF 3F1868P 18-Jul-22 8/15/2022 $ 520
Panguitch City - pws 09007 $ 1,629,000 50/50 2.0% 20 yrs HGA 3F1855 09-Jun-22 8/10/2023 423,000$ 423,000$ 846,000$
Granger-Hunter Improve District - pws 1800713,811,820$ .5% hga fee 30 yrs 3F1850 21-Jul-22 5/9/2023 $ 9,480,000 $ 2,432,620 $ 11,912,620
Ouray Park WID 40,000$ 100% PF 3F1865P 31-Aug-22 6/12/2023 20$ 20$
Beaver City - pws 01001 $ 2,829,146 0%, 40 yrs 3F1874 21-Jul-22 8/17/2023 $ 797,000 $ 805,620 $ 1,602,620
Pine Valley Mt Farms - pws 27061 700,000$ 100% PF 3F1890 31-Aug-22 4/4/2023 $ 630,015 $ 630,015
Leeds Domestic Users Assn - pws 27010 -$ planning advance 100% pf 3F1892 31-Aug-22 5/17/2023 $ - $ -
Beaver Dam Village SSD $ 32,900 100% PF 3F1921P 18-Apr-23 5/23/2023 $ - $ 16,642
Paragonah (advance) $ 300,000 0%, 40 yrs 3F1913 16-May-23 9/11/2023 300,000$ $ 300,000
Spring City P/F planning/design Advance 3F1926 16-May-23 6/12/2023 -$ $ -
Wales Town $ 80,000 100% PF 3F1929 16-May-23 7/3/2023 3,406$ $ 3,406
Henrieville Town $ 49,000 100% PF 3F1914P 25-May-23 6/20/2023 $ - $ 44,000
Price Municipal Corporation $ 85,890 100% PF 3F2000P 14-Jun-23 7/3/2023 $ - $ 85,890
Highlands Water Company $ 40,000 0%, 5 years 3F1917P 15-Jun-23 7/3/2023 40,000$ $ 40,000
Big Plains Water SSD $ 35,200 100% PF 3F2007P 20-Jun-23 7/5/2023 $ 35,200 $ 35,200
Hinckley Town $ 39,000 100% PF 3F1999P 14-Jun-23 7/11/2023 $ 39,000
Weber Meadowview Ranch - pws 22009 $ 2,258,400 0%, 40 yrs 3F1815 18-Nov-21 7/19/2023 $ 560,000 560,000$
Bridgerland Village Water Co - pws 17001 $ 1,350,000 1.7% 30yrs LOF $13,500 3F1837 03-Mar-22 7/26/2023 1,350,000$ 1,350,000$
Wanship Mutual Water Company $ 61,500 0%, 5 years 3F1916P 23-Jan-23 9/12/2023 37,485$ 37,485$
LaVerkin City $ 64,600 100% PF 3F2012P 10-Aug-23 10/2/2023 -$ $ 64,600
Wallsburg Town - pws 26009 $ 239,000 planning advance 100% pf 3F1889 31-Aug-22 10/2/2023 $ - $ -
Neola Water & Sewer District $ 75,000 100% PF 3F1918P 14-Jun-23 10/2/2023 $ 75,000 $ 75,000
Levan Town - pws 12001 $ 2,895,000 2%, 30 yrs 3F1856 21-Jul-22 11/6/2023 1,033,000$ 1,033,050$ 2,066,050$
$ -
$ 17,383,485 $ 7,761,931 $ 25,145,416 $ 317,339
$ 149,741,417 $ 799,339
AVAILABLE PROJECT FUNDS:(43,248,372)$
Legend: Items newer than 11/30/2023 or needing resolution highlighted yellow = AVAILABLE HARDSHIP FUNDS:1,853,812$
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
FEDERAL STATE REVOVING FUND
PROJECTS AUTHORIZED BUT NOT YET CLOSED
as of January 31, 2024
Hardship Fund
5215
Authorized From Fund 5210
(1st or 2nd Round)PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM Project Closing Date
Scheduled or
Estimated
Authorized
Date
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION & PLANNING:
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED:
TOTAL PLANNING AUTHORIZED:
COMMITTED ADVANCES / AGREEMENTS or PARTIALLY DISBURSED CLOSED 2ND ROUND AGREEMENTS:
Loan
Funds Hardship
1st Round Principal Interest Fund TOTAL
Federal Capitalization Grants and State 20% match $291,270,101
Earnings on Invested 1st Round Funds 3,344,295
Repayments (including interest earnings on 2nd round receipts) 41,470,245 25,898,165 2,653,151 364,635,957
Less:
Closed loans and grants -255,489,761 -255,489,761
SUBTOTAL of Funds Available $35,780,340 $41,470,245 $29,242,460 $2,653,151 $109,146,196
Loans & Grants authorized but not yet closed or fully disbursed -121,816,001 -20,163,485 -7,761,931 -799,339 -150,540,756
SUBTOTAL of Funds Available less Authorized -$86,035,661 $21,306,760 $21,480,530 $1,853,812 -$41,429,759
Future Estimates:
Proposed Loans/Grants for current board package 0 0 0
SUBTOTAL of Funds Available less Proposed Loans & Grants -$86,035,661 $21,306,760 $21,480,530 $1,853,812 -$41,429,759
PROJECTIONS THRU January-2025
2023 BIL Supplemental & Match
2023 FED Base SRF Grant & State Match 0
2024 BIL Supplemental & Match 19,666,900
Projected repayments & revenue during the next twelve months 8,693,803 782,409 924,342 10,400,554
Projected annual investment earnings on invested cash balance 1,200,000 84,000 30,000 1,314,000
TOTAL -$66,368,761 $31,200,562 $22,346,939 $2,808,154 -$10,048,306
2nd Round
Loan Payments
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
FEDERAL SRF LOAN FUNDS
as of January 31, 2024
2/15/2024 2:55 PM Federal SRF - STATUS REPORT - SRF Available Cash
FY21 ARPA Appropriation: $25,000,000
FY22 ARPA Appropriation: $21,500,000
Subtotal: $46,500,000
Less:
Authorized Grants & Closed Grants in Construction: $46,020,616
Subtotal: $46,020,616
Total available after Authorized deducted $479,384
Proposed Loan Project(s):$0
Subtotal:$0
AS OF:
$479,384
Total Balance of Funds:$479,384
Projected Receipts Next Twelve Months:
FY2023 Appropriation and Federal Funding
Total Projections $0
January 31, 2025 Total Estimated ARPA Funds Available through 01-31-2025 $479,384
LESS AUTHORIZED (see Page 2 for
details)
PROPOSED (see Page 2 for
details)
January 31, 2024 TOTAL REMAINING ARPA GRANT FUNDS:
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
ARPA Grant FUNDS
AS OF January 31, 2024
SUMMARY
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
ARPA Grant FUNDS
PROJECTS AUTHORIZED
AS OF January 31, 2024
Date Date Signed/
Community Grant # Authorized Closed/Anticipated Grant Total
Brian Head Town - PWS 11001 3F1861 Jun-22 507,870 507,870
Austin SSD - PWS 21003 3S1803 Jun-22 2,269,000 2,269,000
Desert Sage HOA - PWS 24051 3F1859 Jun-22 578,460 578,460
South Duchesne Culinary Water - PWS 07067 3F1879 Jul-22 1,500,500 1,500,500
North Emery SSD - pws 08007 3S1863 Jun-22 14-Feb-24 1,538,000 1,538,000
Cedarview Montwell SSD - PWS 07072 3S1869 Jul-22 3,324,000 3,324,000
Helper - PWS 04004 3F1880 Aug-22 3,016,000 3,016,000
Bicknell Town - emergency spring line repairs 3F2019A Aug-23 100,000 100,000
0
Subtotal Loans and Grants Authorized 12,833,830 12,833,830
COMMITTED GRANT AGREEMENTS W/ CONSTRUCTION IN PROCESS
Church Wells SSD - PWS 13002 3F1824 Jan-22 13-Apr-22 2,252,000 2,252,000
Circleville Town - PWS 16002 3S1825 Jan-22 11-Jul-23 3,500,000 3,500,000
Tridell Lapoint SSD - PWS 24009 3S1836 Mar-22 30-Mar-23 3,500,000 3,500,000
Cannonville Town - PWS 09003 3F1838 Mar-22 01-Jul-22 2,360,676 2,360,676
Pinion Forrest SSD - PWS 07073 3F1844 Jun-22 16-Nov-23 299,000 299,000
Axtell Community Service Dist - PWS 20051 3F1845 Jun-22 11-Oct-22 3,255,110 3,255,110
Kane Co WCD - New Paria Subdivision -PWS 13037 3F1852 Jun-22 14-Oct-22 3,359,000 3,379,000
Kane Co WCD - Clark Bench Wtr Co - PWS 13060 3F1853 Jun-22 01-Nov-22 3,444,000 3,464,000
Daggett Co - Dutch John - PWS 05001 planning advance 3F1857 Jun-22 16-Mar-23 135,000 135,000
Daggett Co - Dutch John - PWS 05001 3F1857 Jun-22 06-Nov-23 3,365,000 3,365,000
Escalante City - 09004 - redevelop spring, emergency 3F1860 Jun-22 29-Jul-22 40,000 40,000
Myton City - pws 07002 3S1864 Jun-22 22-Nov-22 650,000 650,000
Ouray Park WID - PWS 24014 3F1866A Jun-22 16-Mar-23 2,871,000 2,871,000
Cedarview Montwell SSD - planning advance PWS 07072 3S1869 Jul-22 21-Sep-22 176,000 176,000
Helper - PWS 04004 planning advance 3F1880 Mar-23 17-Mar-23 400,000 400,000
Blanding - West Water Community - PWS 19001 3F1897 Aug-22 19-Sep-23 3,500,000 3,500,000
Echo Mutual Water Co - emergency 3F1907 Oct-22 13-Feb-23 40,000 40,000
Thompson SSD - 10004 - emergency, flooding 3F1919 Sep-22 17-Jan-23 40,000 40,000
TOTAL AUTHORIZED Grant/OR CLOSED; Some are Partially FUNDED $46,020,616 $46,060,616
PROPOSED PROJECTS FOR NOVEMBER 2023
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Proposed Projects 0 0
Fund 5215
FY22 ARPA Appropriation:$3,500,000
Subtotal:$3,500,000
Less:
Authorized Grants & Closed Grants in Construction:$2,965,462
Subtotal:$2,965,462
Total available after Authorized deducted $534,538
Proposed Loan Project(s):$0
Subtotal:$0
AS OF:
$534,538
Total Balance of Funds:$534,538
Projected Receipts Next Twelve Months:
FY2023 Appropriation and Federal Funding
Total Projections $0
January 31, 2025 Total Estimated ARPA Funds Available through 01-31-2025 $534,538
LESS AUTHORIZED (see Page 2 for
details)
PROPOSED (see Page 2 for
details)
January 31, 2024 TOTAL REMAINING ARPA GRANT FUNDS:
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
LEAD ARPA Grant FUNDS
AS OF January 31, 2024
SUMMARY
Date Date
Community Grant # Authorized Closed/Anticipated Grant Total
Alpine School District 304,816.18 304,816
Cache District 86,177.92 86,178
Canyons District 199,999.68 200,000
Carbon District 31,874.03 31,874
ChemTech-Ford Laboratories 236194 Jan-23 Jan-23 1,150,000 1,150,000
Cocoon Daycare 393.51 394
Creekside Kids Park City 393.51 394
Davis District 208,141.79 208,142
Emery District 232009 Feb-23 Feb-23 37,776.62 37,777
Grand District 1,500.00 1,500
Iron District 103,413.51 103,414
Just For Kids Adventures 3,000.00 3,000
Kane District 8,307.36 8,307
Little Orchard Preschool 1,574.03 1,574
Logan City District 28,857.14 28,857
Morgan District 11,411.69 11,412
Our Lady of Lourdes 393.51 394
Salt Lake District 176,990.48 176,990
Smart Start Learning Center 9,837.66 9,838
South Summit District 232010 Apr-23 Apr-23 73,192.21 73,192
Time for Families 1,967.53 1,968
Tooele District 30,431.17 30,431
Uintah District 232011 Apr-23 Apr-23 11,936.36 11,936
Utah Catholic Schools 9,050.65 9,051
Utah Community Action 16,133.77 16,134
Washington District 23,684.64 23,685
Weber District 425,206.64 425,207
Lollipops 3,000.00 3,000
Progressive Preschool 3,000.00 3,000
Thomas Edison 1,500.00 1,500
Wee Friends Preschool 1,500.00 1,500
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Subtotal Loans and Grants Authorized 2,965,461.59 2,965,461.59
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
TOTAL AUTHORIZED Grant/OR CLOSED BUT NOT YET FUNDED 2,965,461.59 2,965,461.59
Total Proposed Projects
GRANTS IN PROCESS
PROPOSED PROJECTS FOR NOVEMBER 2023
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
LEAD ARPA Grant FUNDS
PROJECTS AUTHORIZED BUT NOT YET CLOSED
AS OF January 31, 2024
FY22 LSL Grant Loan Portion $26,248,000
Subtotal: $26,248,000
Less:
Authorized Grants & Closed Grants and Loans: $5,862,600
Subtotal: $5,862,600
Total available after Authorized deducted $20,385,400
Proposed Loan Project(s):$39,525,000
Subtotal:$39,525,000
AS OF:
-$19,139,600
Total Balance of Funds:-$19,139,600
Projected Receipts Next Twelve Months:
FY2023 Appropriation and Federal Funding
Total Projections $26,248,000
January 31, 2025 Total Estimated LSLR Funds Available through 01-31-2025 $7,108,400
PROPOSED (see Page 2 for
details)
January 31, 2024 TOTAL REMAINING LSLR LOAN/GRANT FUNDS:
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
Lead Service Line Grant Funds
as of January 31, 2024
SUMMARY
LESS AUTHORIZED (see Page 2 for
details)
As Of: 1/31/2024
Community Grant #
Date
Authorized
Date Agreement
Executed Loan Grant & P/F Total
Subtotal Construction Loans and Grants Authorized $0 $0 $0
Marysvale Town 3F1931PL 23-Apr-23 12-Jun-23 100,000$ 100,000
South Salt Lake Water System 3F1933PL 13-Apr-23 20-Jun-23 100,000$ 100,000
Corinne City Corp 3F1939PL 21-Jul-23 31-Aug-23 100,000$ 100,000
LaVerkin City 3F1948PL 18-Jul-23 31-Aug-23 100,000$ 100,000
Orderville Town 3F1950PL 25-Apr-23 31-Jul-23 87,000$ 87,000
Antimony Town 3F1951PL 03-Jul-23 14-Aug-23 37,000$ 37,000
Tridell Lapoint Water Improvement District 3F1957PL 25-Apr-23 25-Jul-23 100,000$ 100,000
Escalante City Water System 3F1958PL 12-May-23 03-Jul-23 41,000$ 41,000
Daggett Co-Dutch John Town 3F1959PL 18-Jul-23 31-Jul-23 80,000$ 80,000
Joseph Municipal Water System 3F1960PL 21-Jul-23 31-Jul-23 36,000$ 36,000
Cedar City Waterworks 3F1961PL 28-Apr-23 11-Jul-23 100,000$ 100,000
Neola Water & Sewer District 3F1963PL 18-Jul-23 15-Aug-23 100,000$ 100,000
Fremont Water Works 3F1964PL 21-Jul-23 31-Jul-23 88,000$ 88,000
Rockville Pipeline Company 3F1966PL 21-Jul-23 11-Sep-23 69,000$ 69,000
Ballard Water Improvement District 3F1970PL 20-Jul-23 11-Sep-23 85,000$ 85,000
Kearns Improvement District 3F1972PL 03-May-23 06-Jul-23 100,000$ 100,000
Magna Water District.3F1973PL 05-May-23 17-Jul-23 100,000$ 100,000
Granger-Hunter Improvement District 3F1975PL 03-May-23 03-Jul-23 100,000$ 100,000
City of Moab 3F1977PL 15-May-23 12-Jun-23 100,000$ 100,000
Green River City 3F1978PL 12-May-23 31-Jul-23 96,000$ 96,000
Cedarview Montwell SSD 3F1979PL 25-Jul-23 15-Aug-23 100,000$ 100,000
Wellington City 3F1981PL 22-May-23 31-Aug-23 100,000$ 100,000
Jensen Water Improvement District 3F1988PL 21-Jul-23 11-Sep-23 96,000$ 96,000
Sandy City - amended 3F1991PL 03-May-23 31-Aug-23 100,000$ 100,000
Holden Town Water System 3F1992PL 04-Aug-23 15-Aug-23 73,000$ 73,000
Price Municipal Corporation 3F1996PL 25-Jul-23 31-Aug-23 100,000$ 100,000
Kane County Water Conservancy District 3F2008PL 27-Jun-23 25-Jul-23 389,300$ 389,300
Cannonville Town 3F2011PL 25-Jul-23 31-Aug-23 78,000$ 78,000
Circleville Town Water System 3F1945PL 03-Jul-23 19-Jul-23 83,000$ 83,000
West Corinne Water Company 3F1983PL 20-Jul-23 19-Jul-23 60,000$ 60,000
Springdale Town Water System 3F1965PL 20-Jul-23 02-Oct-23 94,000$ 94,000
Church Wells Special Service District 3F1943P 21-Jul-23 02-Oct-23 37,000$ 37,000
Myton City 3F1980P 18-Jun-23 02-Oct-23 100,000$ 100,000
Junction Town 3F1942P 03-Jul-23 04-Oct-23 53,000$ 53,000
Provo City 3F1934P 13-Jun-23 18-Oct-23 100,000$ 100,000
City of Logan 3F1997P 05-May-23 100,000$ 100,000
North Village Special Service District 3F1953P Jul-23 Jan-24 $ 8,300 8,300
Jordanelle Special Service District 3F1954P Jul-23 Jan-24 $ 15,500 15,500
Twin Creeks Special Service District 3F1955P Jul-23 Jan-24 $ 17,500 17,500
Charleston Water Conservancy District 3F1967P Jul-23 Feb-24 $ 25,000 25,000
Cedar Fort W.S.3F1945P Jul-23 $ 35,000 35,000
Lyman W.S.3F1941P Jul-23 72,000$ 72,000
Axtell Community Special Service District 3F1989P Jul-23 75,000$ 75,000
Glen Canyon Special Service District 3F1976P Jul-23 Jan-24 78,000$ 78,000
Panguitch City 3F1962P Jul-23 Dec-23 $86,000 86,000
Milford W.S.3F1998P May-23 Jan-24 90,000$ 90,000
Lead Service Line Grant Funds
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
Fund 5210
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AUTHORIZED, NOT CLOSED
PLANNING PROJECTS AUTHORIZED, IN PROCESS
Torrey Town W.S.3F1944P Jul-23 Jan-24 91,000$ 91,000
Ouray Park Water Improvement District 3F1969P Jul-23 Jan-24 93,000$ 93,000
Brian Head Town 3F2010P Jul-23 $99,000 99,000
Helper Municipal 3F1935P Apr-23 Jan-24 $100,000 100,000
Salt Lake City 3F1972P Apr-23 $100,000 100,000
Moroni City 3F1990P May-23 Jan-24 100,000$ 100,000
Gunnison City 3F1946P Apr-23 Jan-24 100,000$ 100,000
City of St. George 3F1986P May-23 Feb-24 100,000$ 100,000
Sunset City W.S.3F1994P May-23 Feb-24 100,000$ 100,000
East Carbon and Sunnyside 3F1995P Jul-23 100,000$ 100,000
Johnson Water Improvement District 3F1956P Jul-23 100,000$ 100,000
Sigurd Town 3F1940P Aug-23 Oct-23 70,000$ 70,000
Green Hills Country Estates Water Sewer
Improvement District 3F1985P Aug-23 Dec-23 70,000$ 70,000
Scipio Town 3F1932P Aug-23 $98,000 98,000
Salina City 3F1971P Aug-23 $100,000 100,000
Manti City 3F1952P Aug-23 Jan-24 $100,000 100,000
Wellsville City 3F1982P Aug-23 $110,000 110,000
Highland City 3F1936P Aug-23 $110,000 110,000
Boulder Farmstead Water Company 3F1923P Jun-23 Nov-23 37,000$ 37,000
Midvale City 3F2020P Nov-23 Jan-24 100,000$ 100,000
0
Subtotal Planning Loans and Grants Authorized $318,000 $5,444,600 $5,762,600
Community Grant #
Date
Authorized
Date Agreement
Executed
Funds Pending Fund
Dispursed Total Funds
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Subtotal Grants and Loans Partially Disbursed -$ $0 $0
TOTALS
Total Authorized Not Closed $5,762,600
Total Closed Partially Dispursed $0
Pending Dispursment Total -$
Total Proposed Projects 39,525,000.00$
Total Closed Current FY $100,000
Salt Lake City DPU 20,175,000 19,350,000 39,525,000
0
0
0
0
0
Total Proposed Projects 20,175,000 19,350,000 39,525,000
CLOSED PROJECTS PARTIALLY DISBURSED
PROPOSED PROJECTS FOR JANUARY 2023
FY22 EC Grant (excludes set-asides): $6,797,600
Subtotal: $6,797,600
Less:
Authorized Grants & Closed Grants in Construction: $6,530,000
Subtotal: $6,530,000
Total available after Authorized deducted $267,600
Proposed Loan Project(s):$0
Subtotal:$0
AS OF:
$267,600
Total Balance of Funds:$267,600
Projected Receipts Next Twelve Months:
FY2023 Appropriation and Federal Funding
Total Projections $6,800,000
January 31, 2025 Total Estimated EC Funds Available through 01-31-2025 $7,067,600
PROPOSED (see Page 2 for
details)
January 31, 2024 TOTAL REMAINING EC GRANT FUNDS:
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
Emerging Contaminants Grant Funds
as of January 31, 2024
SUMMARY
LESS AUTHORIZED (see Page 2 for
details)
As Of: 1/31/2024
Date Date Signed/
Community Grant # Authorized Closed/Anticipated Grant Total
Green River (for loan see SRF Commitments tab)3F1925E 16-May-23 3,530,000$ 3,530,000
Green Hills WSID (for loan see SRF Commits tab)3F1930E 16-May-23 22-Dec-23 500,000$ 500,000
Granger-Hunter ID 3F2017E 30-Aug-23 20-Dec-23 2,500,000$ 2,500,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Subtotal Loans and Grants Authorized 6,530,000 6,530,000
TOTAL AUTHORIZED Grant/OR CLOSED; Some are Partially FUNDED $6,530,000 $6,530,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Proposed Projects 0 0
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
PROJECTS AUTHORIZED BUT NOT YET CLOSED
Emerging Contaminants Grant Funds
Fund 2510
COMMITTED GRANT AGREEMENTS W/ CONSTRUCTION IN PROCESS
PROPOSED PROJECTS FOR JANUARY 2023
Total State Fund: $26,638,797
Total State Hardship Fund: $4,153,072
Subtotal: $30,791,870
Less:
Authorized Loans & Closed loans in construction: $18,643,000
Authorized Hardship: $2,574,501
Subtotal: $21,217,501
Total available after Authorized deducted $9,574,369
Proposed Loan Project(s):$0
Proposed Hardship Project(s):$0
Subtotal:$0
AS OF:
$7,995,797
$1,578,572
Total Balance of ALL Funds:$9,574,369
Projected Receipts Next Twelve Months:
Annual Maximum Sales Tax Projection $3,587,500
Less Seven County Infrastructure Coalition ($363,009)
+ Less State Match for 2024 Base/BIL Grants ($3,057,600)
Less Appropriation to DDW Operating Budget ($1,286,500)
SUBTOTAL Sales Tax Revenue including adjustments:-$1,119,609
Payment:
Interest on Investments (Both Loan and Hardship Accounts) $600,000
Principal payments $2,731,000
Interest payments $612,417
Total Projections:$2,823,808
Total Estimated State SRF Funds Available through 01-31-2025 $12,398,177
January 31, 2025
and Sales Tax Revenue
January 31, 2024
SUMMARY
TOTAL UNCOMMITTED STATE HARDSHIP FUNDS:
TOTAL UNCOMMITTED STATE LOAN FUNDS:
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
STATE LOAN FUNDS
as of January 31, 2024
PROPOSED
LESS AUTHORIZED
(see Page 2 for
details)
(see Page 2 for
details)
2/15/20243:04 PM State SRF - STATUS REPORT - DWB Status Report
Cost Date Date
Community Terms Loan #Estimate Authorized Closed/Anticipated Loan (5235)Grant (5240)Total
Austin SSD 1.88%, 30 yrs 3S1803 3,210,000 Jun-22 436,000 0 436,000
Lynndyl Town 0%, 30 yrs 3S1858 2,048,000 Jun-22 436,000 1,610,000 2,046,000
Bristlecone - pws 09077 100% PF 3S1822 93,500 Jan-22 Feb-24 (Est.)0 93,500 93,500
Cedarview Montwell SSD 0%, 40 yrs 3S1869A 4,715,000 Jul-22 1,165,000 0 1,165,000
Bear River WCD-HARPER WARD (#2068)1%, 20 yrs 3S1849 6,251,400 Jun-22 May-24 (Est)2,840,000 0 2,840,000
Ephraim City 1%, 20 yrs 3S1828 2,560,000 Jan-22 May-24 (Est)500,000 0 500,000
Fruitland Wtr SSD - PWS 07058 2.64%, 30 yrs 3S1891 289,769 Aug-22 Dec-23 (Est.)287,000 0 287,000
Junction Town Water System 1%, 30 yrs 3S1915 1,854,611 May-23 480,000 120,000 600,000
North Emery SSD 0%, 30 yrs 3S1863 2,550,000 Jun-22 Feb-24 512,000 0 512,000
Enoch City 1%, 20 yrs 3S1834 1,546,823 Mar-22 Dec-23 645,000 0 645,000
Oak City - PWS 14010, 50% loan 2.62%, 20 yrs 3S1902 275,000 Nov-22 245,000 0 245,000
Manti (irrigation)0%, 40 yrs 3S1924 7,687,000 May-23 7,687,000 0 7,687,000
Subtotal Loans and Grants Authorized 15,233,000 1,823,500 17,056,500
Stockton Town 0%3S1870P 40000 May-22 40,000 0 40,000
Glen Canyon SSD of Big Water 3S1801P 39,300 May-21 Jul-21 0 39,300 39,300
Price Municpal Corp 3S1895P 280,000 Aug-22 Oct-22 0 100,000 100,000
Axtell Community Service Distribution 2%, 20 yrs 3S1765P 103,000 Sep-20 Jun-21 0 103,000 103,000
Fayette Town 3S2018P 42,000 Sep-23 0 32,000 32,000
Manti City 3S2013P 250,000 Jun-23 0 100,000 100,000
Subtotal Planning in Process 40,000 374,300 414,300
Seven County Infrastructure Coalition Legis. Pass thru 232043 400,000 Jul-22 May-23 0 371,895 371,895
Powder Mountain WSID 2.54%, 30 yrs 3S1830 1,895,000 Jan-22 Jun-22 300,000 0 300,000
Pleasant Grove City 1.6%, 20 yrs 3S1796 5,400,000 Jun-21 Feb-22 2,300,000 0 2,300,000
Uintah Town (#29020)3S1810P 39,500 Aug-21 Dec-22 0 830 830
Circleville Town 0.5%, 30 yrs 3S1825A 4,270,000 Jan-22 Jul-23 470,000 0 470,000
Tridell Lapoint SSD PWS #24009 0%, 40 yrs 3S1836 4,420,000 Mar-22 Mar-23 300,000 0 300,000
Thompson SSD 3S1747P 29,500 Jan-20 Feb-20 0 3,975 3,975
Subtotal Closed Loans Partially Disbursed 3,370,000 376,701 3,746,701
TOTAL AUTHORIZED/PLANNING/OR CLOSED BUT NOT YET FUNDED $18,643,000 $2,574,501 $21,217,501
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Proposed Projects 0 0 0
PROPOSED PROJECTS FOR NOVEMBER 2023
Authorized Funding
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
PROJECTS AUTHORIZED BUT NOT YET CLOSED
AS OF January 31, 2024
STATE LOAN FUNDS
CLOSED LOANS (partially disbursed)
PLANNING LOANS / GRANTS IN PROCESS
2/15/20243:04 PM State SRF - STATUS REPORT - Commitments
Agenda Item
8(B)
DW SRF LOAN FUNDS
CASH FLOW FORECAST REPORT
January 31, 2024
State Fiscal Year State Fiscal Year State Fiscal Year State Fiscal Year State Fiscal Year State Fiscal Year State Fiscal Year
FEDERAL STATE REVOLVING FUND (FSRF - 5210)2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Funds Available
Supplemental 2022 Grant not disbursed 11,636,920
Base Grant 2023 (est w/o inc & less set-asides)5,020,920 - - - - - -
Future Base Grant State Match (est @ 20%)- - - - - -
BIL SRF-Capitalization Grants 2023 (est)*16,091,100 16,716,600 18,107,800 18,107,800 - - -
Future BIL State Match (est)4,518,000 4,894,000 4,894,000 - - -
SRF - 2nd Round 67,686,739 40,092,244 13,324,519 28,417,934 58,289,926 70,609,601 83,682,847
Interest Earnings at 2%1,353,735 801,845 266,490 568,359 1,165,799 1,412,192 1,673,657
Interest Payments (5210)782,409 766,761 751,426 736,397 721,669 707,236 693,091
Loan Repayments 8,582,603 9,011,733 9,462,320 9,935,436 10,432,208 10,953,818 11,501,509
Total Funds Available 111,154,426 71,907,183 46,806,555 62,659,926 70,609,601 83,682,847 97,551,103
PROJECT OBLIGATIONS
Granger Hunter ImpDist: 3F1708 & 3F1850 (3,400,000) (5,000,000) (4,512,620)
Hyde Park City (1,500,000)
Moroni - 3F1878 (400,000)
Bicknell (678,000)
East Carbon (1,300,000)
High Valley Water Company - pws 22021 (1,509,000)
High Valley Water Company - pws 22021 (700,000)
Pine Valley Mt Farms - pws 27061 (630,015)
Spring City (366,000)
Wales Town (5,976)
Highlands Water Company (40,000)
Big Plains Water SSD (35,200)
Panguitch City 3F1855 (846,000)
Beaver City 3F1874 (1,602,620)
Leeds Domestic 3F1892 -
Paragonah (300,000)
Weber Meadowview 3F1815 (560,000)
Bridgerland Village 3F1837 (1,350,000)
Wanship Mutual 3F1916P (37,485)
Wallsburg Town 3F1889 -
Neola Water 3F1918P (75,000)
PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS
Authorized Projects Under 2 Million (5,217,228) (4,935,258)
Skyline Mountain SSD (2,883,000) (240,000)
Roosevelt City (840,000) (2,001,400)
Henefer Secondary Water (2,100,000) (1,100,000)
Johnson WID (2,352,000)
Levan (1,171,050) (1,695,000)
Holden Town (4,345,500) (3,945,500)
Wallsburg Town (2,284,000) (4,410,000)
Leeds Domestic Users Assn (1,708,696) (3,633,494) (1,960,310)
Hanna Water & Sewer (167,254) (2,695,893) (620,691)
TimberLakes SSD 3F1877 (3,263,000)
Ballard Water ID 3F1896 (305,000) (5,500,000) (1,295,000)
Hidden Lake Assn (3,838,040)
Ogden City (10,000,000) (10,000,000) (10,000,000) (4,370,000)
Virgin Town (1,535,244) (1,535,245)
Brian Head Town (2,741,874) (2,741,874)
Paragonah (3,650,000) (3,350,000)
Leamington Town - -
Green River (EC portion excluded)(1,045,000) (1,000,000)
Spring City (2,733,000) (3,099,000)
Stockton Town (1,500,000) (1,700,000)
Green Hills Estates WSID (2,047,000)
Proposed Projects
Est Total Outflow (71,062,182) (58,582,664) (18,388,621) (4,370,000) - - -
Est Fund Balance Available 40,092,244$ 13,324,519$ 28,417,934$ 58,289,926$ 70,609,601$ 83,682,847$ 97,551,103$
*EPA grant awards are usually delayed until the following state fiscal year: e.g. GY22 was received in Sept 2022.
State Fiscal Year State Fiscal Year State Fiscal Year State Fiscal Year State Fiscal Year State Fiscal Year State Fiscal Year
UTAH SRF FUND (STATE SRF FUND 5235)2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Funds Available
Water Development Security Fund 23,684,899$ 21,845,399$ 18,405,899$ 17,873,399$ 17,954,899$ 25,153,299$ 32,532,599$
Sales Tax Revenue 3,587,500 3,587,500 3,587,500 3,587,500 3,587,500 3,587,500 3,587,500
Loan Repayments 3,000,000 3,150,000 3,308,000 3,473,000 3,647,000 3,829,000 4,020,000
Total Funds Available 30,272,399 28,582,899 25,301,399 24,933,899 25,189,399 32,569,799 40,140,099
General Obligations
State Match Transfers - (4,518,000) (4,894,000) (4,894,000) - - -
DDW Administrative Expenses est inc of 3%- (33,000) (34,000) (35,000) (36,100) (37,200) (38,300)
Project Obligations
Pleasant Grove City (2,300,000)
Powder Mtn WSID (300,000)
Tridell Lapoint SSD 0% 40 yrs (300,000) - - - - - -
Circleville Town 470k loan .5% 30yrs (470,000)
DW SRF LOAN FUNDS
CASH FLOW FORECAST REPORT
January 31, 2024
-
Loan Authorizations
Bear River WCD-HARPER WARD 1% 20yrs (1,400,000) (1,440,000)
North Emery SSD 0% int 30 yrs (262,000) (250,000)
Austin SSD 1.88% 30yrs (186,000) (250,000)
Ephraim City 1% 20yrs (250,000) (250,000)
Enoch City 1% 20yrs (145,000) (500,000)
Cedarview Montwell SSD 0% int 40 yrs (1,165,000)
Fruitland SSD (287,000)
Oak City (245,000)
Junction Town Water System (480,000)
Manti (irrigation)(637,000) (2,500,000) (2,500,000) (2,050,000)
Lynndyl Town (436,000)
-
Planned Projects
Total Obligations (8,427,000) (10,177,000) (7,428,000) (6,979,000) (36,100) (37,200) (38,300)
WDSF Unobligated Funds 21,845,399$ 18,405,899$ 17,873,399$ 17,954,899$ 25,153,299$ 32,532,599$ 40,101,799$
Total SRF Funds 61,937,643 31,730,418 46,291,333 76,244,825 95,762,900 116,215,446 137,652,902
Agenda Item
8(C)
Project Priority List
Presented to the Drinking Water Board
February 29,2024
DRINKING WATER BOARD
BOARD PACKET FOR PROJECT PRIORITY LIST
PRESENTED TO THE DRINKING WATER BOARD
There are two new projects being added to the project priority list:
Big Plains Water SSD scored 100 priority rating points as an emergency funding request.Big
Plains Water Special Service District is seeking emergency funds to address critical needs with
aging infrastructure and water source issues.The District is requesting emergency funding to add
an interconnecting service line,consisting of a 4.5-mile pipeline,between the Apple Valley
Water System and the Cedar Point Water System.The District has this project as a top priority in
the master plan that was completed in July 2023.The emergency source capacity conditions in
the Cedar Point System have further increased the need to complete this connection as quickly as
possible.
Salt Lake City DPU scored 20.3 priority rating points.Their project will coordinate both
planning and construction efforts for lead service line inventory and replacements,identify lead
services through records review,public outreach,and verification methods (including but not
limited to field investigations,customer provided data,and test pitting),and develop a targeted
approach for service line removal throughout the system.The construction component of the
program will include public and private lead service line removal,as well as to potentially
replace aging water mains to facilitate the service line replacements where large quantities of
lead are present.
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
The Drinking Water Board approve the updated Project Priority List.
February 8, 2024 Project Priority List
Authorized
Total Unmet Needs:Total Needs, incl. Recent funding $573,239,171 19,893,650$
da
t
e
BI
L

$
ty
p
e
%Green System Name County Pop.ProjectTitle Project Total SRF Assistance BIL funds
authorized Funds Authorized Source Treat.Stor.Dist.fire-eligiblegrowth-eligsecond hoother-eligi Principal Forgiveness
N 100 Big Plains - Apple Valley Washingto 763 Emergency Project-Connect Apple Valley to Ced $3,370,000.00 $3,370,000 $3,370,000 $81.29 $38,600 1,350,000$
N 20.3 Salt Lake City DPU Salt Lake 364,982 Planning & Construction for LSL Inventory & Rep $39,525,000.00 $39,525,000 $39,525,000 $95.83 $46,500 19,350,000$
A 99.3 M&J Trailer Home Box Elder 27 New well, tank, dist line, arsenic tmnt $1,660,000 $1,540,000 $1,540,000 85 65 20 40 $24,596
A 77.1 Brian Head Town Iron New Well drilling and equipping, replace main lin $6,427,292 $5,141,834 $5,483,748 $77.69 $24,900
A 65.8 Brian Head Town Iron 165 Install new transmission line/fire hydrants along $857,986 $507,870 $507,870 20 $82.92 $24,900
A 64.4 Johnson WID Uintah 1,880 upgrading 24,000 ft undersized waterlines $2,452,000 $2,352,000 $2,352,000 40 $58.80 $36,120 2,352,000$
A 63.6 Roosevelt City Duchesne 6,800 pipeline replacement, lining of DI pipe, new pipe $2,951,400 $2,841,400 $2,841,400 25 35 $87.92 $41,000
A 55.9 Ballard Water ID Uintah 1,367 800,000 gal tank, well; 3.5 miles of 12" trans line $7,287,000 $7,100,000 $7,100,000 20 15 30 $113.10 $44,100 3,500,000$
A 53.5 Virgin Town Washington New 500,000 gal water tank and waterline $2,248,000 $1,848,000 $1,848,000 $51.00 $42,700
A 48.9 Roosevelt City Duchesne 8,461 12000 ft of 12" transmission line, 2 PRV stations $2,418,600.00 $2,300,000 $2,300,000
A 48.5 Pinion Forest SSD Duchesne 640 Water treatement improvements: chlorination an $300,000 $300,000 $299,000 50 $43.35 $44,160
A 47.2 Pine Valley Mountain Farms Washingto 144 Tank reburshment, trans line replacement, solar $418,485 $348,500 $630,015 25 30 $92.51 $53,300
A 43.9 Wilson Arch San Juan 27 New water lines, water meters, booster pump, a $1,138,000 $1,138,000 $1,138,000 20 $85.00 $38,300 569,000$
A 40.7 GrangerHunter ID - Emerging CSalt Lake 132,887 WTP to treat manganese on Wells 16& 18 $11,457,840.00 $2,500,000 $13,957,840
A 39.2 Ogden City Davis 88,221 Replace the transmission line that runs down Og $87,000,000 $34,370,000 $34,370,000 $40.78 $$38,700 3,500,000$
A 36.3 Cornish Town Cache 270 well house, RO/Chlorine Treatment, Booster, 25 $1,704,922 $1,504,922 $1,504,922 10 25 25 $71.44 $39,500
A 31.4 Stockton Town Tooele New Well $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $41.51 $50,576
A 29 Hanna Water and Sewer Distric Duchesne 742 200,000 gallon tank, booster pump station, dist l $3,483,838 $3,483,838 $3,483,838 20 $44.14 $30,100
A 28.1 Upper Whittemore Utah 128 chlorinator $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 10 25 $75.00 $46,200 250,000$
A 28 Payson City Utah 22,725 Connect Church to City water system $346,430.00 $346,430 $346,430 $27.33 $45,100
A 28 Leeds Domestic Water Washingto 797 New well, chloirinator, main line and dist line rep $7,524,500 $7,519,500 $7,792,500 20 5 40 $52.30 $40,100
A 27.4 Wallsburg Town Wasatch 300 500,000 gallon tank, new pipeline, PRV $6,933,000 $6,933,000 50 30 $36.06 $52,100
A 27.2 Green Hills Estates WSID Weber New pump house $2,085,287 $1,921,076 $2,047,000 $69,500
A 26.7 North Emery SSD Emery 1,500 new 250,000-gallon tank, replace PRV vaults, re $2,550,000 $2,050,000 $2,050,000 1,538,000$
A 23.7 Foothill WAU Iron 30 250,000 tank, meters, hydrants;wellhouse, well & $603,030.00 $603,030
A 21 Skyline Mountain SSD Sanpete 225 41K tank and well house, impact fee study, loan $3,123,000 $3,123,000
A 16.5 Paragonah Iron Waterlines, new well, 250,000 gallon tank $7,452,000 $7,300,000 $7,300,000 $31.22 $40,500
A 15.3 Fremont Waterworks Company Wayne 320 3100 ft. line: new master meters, 6 hydrants, rad $1,429,250.00 $1,425,000
A 13.8 Spring City Sanpete Install of a new 12” pipeline, replace other old pi $6,359,770 $6,198,000 $6,198,000 $37.58 $40,400
A 13.5 Desert Sage AVWID Uintah 55 Watermain replacement, hydrants, meters, serv $598,460 $578,460 $578,000
A 11.5 Bristlecone Garfield 180 SCADA, drainage and overflow relocation $93,500 $93,500 $93,500 8 15 $153.24 $40,100
A 10.4 Myton Town Duchesne 590 New waterline and connections, hydrants.$650,000 $650,000 $650,000
A 10.4 Panguitch Garfield 1,730 9000 lf 10-in mainline, valves, hydrants, connect $1,629,000 $1,609,000 $1,609,000 10 $36.46 $34,600
A 9.8 Holden Town Millard 450 New well, tank, dist lines, meters, chlorination up $8,841,000 $8,691,000 $8,691,000 20 5 15 20 $29.51 $44,500
A 8.5 Hidden Lake Association Summit 364 New well, distribution line, 50,800 gal concrete t $3,838,040 $3,838,040 $29.17 $68,800
A 7.5 Enoch City Iron 6,500 New 2M Gallon steel tank $1,639,440 $645,000 $645,000
A 0 Henefer (Secondary Irrigation)Summit 1,025 Secondary irrigation $2,100,000 $2,100,000 $2,100,000
N =New Application E=Energy Efficiency
A =Authorized W= Water Efficiency
P = Potential Project- no G= Green Infrastructure
I= Environmentally Innovative
Me
d
i
a
n

A
G
I

Av
g
.

M
o
n
t
h
l
y

W
a
t
e
r

B
i
l
l
Av
g
.

o
f

A
p
p
.

P
r
o
j
.

S
e
g
'
s
.
Utah Federal SRF Program
Pr
i
o
r
i
t
y

P
o
i
n
t
s
Project Segments
Pa
r
t
i
a
l

E
l
i
g
i
b
i
l
i
t
y

Q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
$965,768,289 $877,830,537

Agenda Item
8(D)(i)(a)
Salt Lake City
Presented to the Drinking Water Board
February 29,2024
DRINKING WATER BOARD
BOARD PACKET FOR CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE
APPLICANT’S REQUEST:
Salt Lake City is requesting financial assistance for a 5-year planning and construction
project for lead service line inventory and replacement.
This project will coordinate both planning and construction efforts for lead service line
inventory and replacements.They will identify lead services through records review,
public outreach,and verification methods (including but not limited to field
investigations,customer provided data,and test pitting),and will develop a targeted
approach for removals throughout the system.The construction component of the
program will include public and private lead service line removals,as well as potential
replacement of aging water mains to facilitate these service line replacements where large
quantities of lead are present.Estimated LSLs for replacement range from 9,402 to
14,457 and will be updated in the inventory as LSLs are replaced and unknowns are
identified.
This project scored 20.3 points on the Project Priority List.
The total project cost is $39,525,000.They are requesting the full amount from the
Drinking Water Board.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The local MAGI for Salt Lake City is $46,500 which is 90%of the State MAGI.The
current average water bill is $95.83,which is 2.47%of the local MAGI.The estimated
after project water bill at full loan would be $91.96 or 2.37%of the local MAGI.Based
on the after project water bill,Salt Lake City qualifies to be considered for additional
subsidy.
Option Loan /Grant
Principal
Forgiveness Loan Term
Interest
Rate
(HGA)
Water
Bill
%Local
MAGI
1 51 /49 $19,350,000 $20,175,000 20 yrs 1.50%$91.96 2.37%
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
The Drinking Water Board authorize a construction loan of up to $39,525,000 with
$19,350,000 in principal forgiveness to Salt Lake City,for a repayable loan amount
of $20,175,000 at 1.50%hardship grant assessment fee for up to 39 years.
Salt Lake City
February 29,2024
Page 2
APPLICANT’S LOCATION:
Salt Lake City is located in Salt Lake County.
MAP OF APPLICANT’S LOCATION:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Construction work will include removal and replacement of both public services and
private services that are currently either lead or galvanized requiring replacement.New
copper services will be installed in place of the lead or GRR services.This work may also
include removal and replacement of aging water mains in order to facilitate service line
replacements where large quantities of lead services are present.Additionally,this project
will include all work associated with both service line and water main replacements
inclusive of valve,fitting,and hydrant replacements,temporary bypass,and site
restoration.Construction may include new copper piping for service lines,new curbstops,
and new connections to existing water mains,as well as connections to existing water
meters on the customer side.Items that are not lead service line replacements will be
reimbursed from the base SRF program.
Salt Lake City
February 29,2024
Page 3
POPULATION GROWTH:
Population growth is based on Salt Lake City’s service area.
Year Population Connections
Current 364,982 92,374
2030 376,438 95,273
2040 400,439 101,348
COST ESTIMATE:
Legal/Bonding/Admin $1,581,000
Engineering -Design $1,844,500
Engineering -CMS $4,479,500
Construction -$26,350,000
Contingency (~10%)$5,270,000
Total $39,525,000
COST ALLOCATION:
Funding Source Cost Sharing Percent of Project
DWB Loan (1.5 %,20-yr)$20,175,000 51%
DWB PF $19,350,000 49%
Total $39,525,000 100%
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
DWB Funding Authorization:Feb 2024
Advertise for Bids:May 2024
Bid Opening:June 2024
Loan Closing:July 2024
Begin Construction:August 2024
Complete Construction:August 2029
IPS SUMMARY:
Code Description Physical
Facilities
Quality
&
Monitoring
Significant
Deficiency
Violations
PS33 PUMP FACILITY NOT PROTECTED FROM
VANDALISM OR UNAUTHORIZED ENTRY (PF010)
15
V004 STORAGE TANK LADDERS IN EXCESS OF 20 FEET
LACK SAFETY FEATURE SUCH AS CAGE,HARNESS
OR PLATFORM (ST029)
15
Total =30
Salt Lake City
February 29,2024
Page 4
CONTACT INFORMATION:
APPLICANT:Salt Lake City Water System
1530 S West Temple Street
Salt Lake City,UT 84115
PRESIDING OFFICIAL &
CONTACT PERSON:Laura Briefer
1530 S West Temple
Salt Lake City,UT 84115
801-483-6700
[e-mail]
TREASURER/RECORDER:Lisa Tarufelli
801-483-6755
[e-mail]
CONSULTING ENGINEER:Emma McGowan
Jacobs
6440 S.Millrock Drive,Suite 300
Salt Lake City,UT 84121
413-522-7768
[e-mail]
BOND ATTORNEY:Bradley Patterson
Gilmore &Bell
15 West South Temple,Suite 1450
Salt Lake City,UT 84101
801-258-2724
[e-mail]
WATER QUALITY &Teresa Gray
TREATMENT 801-483-6744
ADMINISTRATOR [e-mail]
PROGRAM MANAGER Dustin White
801-483-6867
[e-mail]
DRINKING WATER BOARD FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE EVALUATION
SYSTEM NAME: Salt Lake City FUNDING SOURCE: Federal SRF
COUNTY: UT
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

51 % Loan & 49 % P.F.
ESTIMATED POPULATION: 364,982 NO. OF CONNECTIONS: 76127 * SYSTEM RATING: APPROVED
CURRENT AVG WATER BILL: $95.83 * PROJECT TOTAL: $39,525,000
CURRENT % OF AGI: 2.47% FINANCIAL PTS: 55 LOAN AMOUNT: $20,175,000
ESTIMATED MEDIAN AGI: $46,500 PRINC. FORGIVE.: $19,350,000
STATE AGI: $51,600 TOTAL REQUEST: $39,525,000
SYSTEM % OF STATE AGI: 90%
@ ZERO % @ RBBI EQUIVALENT @ CALCULATED
RATE MKT RATE ANNUAL PAYMENT INTEREST RATE
0% 3.54%#REF! **1.59%
SYSTEM
ASSUMED LENGTH OF DEBT, YRS: 20 20 20 20
ASSUMED NET EFFECTIVE INT. RATE: 0.00% 3.54%#REF!1.59%
REQUIRED DEBT SERVICE: $1,008,750.00 $1,424,677.39 #REF!$1,185,559.63
*PARTIAL COVERAGE (15%): $0.00 $0.00 #REF!$0.00
*ADD. COVERAGE AND RESERVE (10%): $100,875.00 $142,467.74 #REF!$118,555.96
$14.58 $20.59 #REF!$17.13

O & M + FUNDED DEPRECIATION: $69,425,909.00 $69,425,909.00 $69,425,909.00 $69,425,909.00
OTHER DEBT + COVERAGE: $9,375,000.00 $9,375,000.00 $9,375,000.00 $9,375,000.00
REPLACEMENT RESERVE ACCOUNT: $3,896,732.95 $3,917,529.32 #REF!$3,905,573.43
ANNUAL EXPENSES PER CONNECTION:$1,086.31 $1,086.58 #REF!$1,086.43
$83,807,266.95 $84,285,583.45 #REF! $84,010,598.03
TAX REVENUE: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
RESIDENCE
MONTHLY NEEDED WATER BILL:$91.74 $92.26 #REF!$91.96
% OF ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME:2.37% 2.38% #REF!2.37%

$0
Lsl Inventory and replacement
$0.00
ANNUAL NEW DEBT PER CONNECTION:
TOTAL SYSTEM EXPENSES

Agenda Item
8(D)(i)(b)
Big Plains Water Special Service District
Presented to the Drinking Water Board
February 29, 2024

DRINKING WATER BOARD
BOARD PACKET FOR CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE

APPLICANT’S REQUEST:

The Big Plains Water Special Service District (BPWSSD) is requesting emergency
financial assistance to install a 4.5-mile transmission line to connect the Apple Valley
Water System with the Cedar Point Water System and resolve a source capacity issue in
the Cedar Point system. Both systems are currently managed by the District but are not
physically connected. Total project cost is estimated at $3,370,000 and the District is
requesting the full amount from the Board.

As an emergency request, this project scored 100 points on the Project Priority List.

STAFF COMMENTS:

The local MAGI for the District is $38,300, which is 74.2% of the State MAGI. The current
average water bill is $81.29/ERC, which is 2.55% of the local MAGI. The estimated after
project water bill at full loan would be $115.58/ERC or 3.62% of the local MAGI. Based
on the local MAGI and after project water bill, Big Plains Water SSD qualifies to be
considered for additional subsidy.

Option Loan / Grant
Principal
Forgiveness Loan Term
Interest
Rate
Water
Bill
% Local
MAGI
1 100 / 0 $0 $3,370,000 30 yrs 1.62% $115.58 3.62%
2 60 / 40 $1,350,000 $2,020,000 39 yrs 1.62% $100.01 3.13%
3 70 / 30 $1,000,000 $2,370,000 39 yrs 0.0% $97.97 3.07%
4 60 / 40 $1,350,000 $2,020,000 39 yrs 0.0% $96.04 3.01%

FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:

The Financial Assistance Committee moved this project to the Drinking Water Board
for discussion without a specific funding recommendation.

Big Plains Water SSD
February 29, 2024
Page 2

APPLICANT’S LOCATION:

Big Plains Water SSD serves Apple Valley Town and is located in Washington County
approximately 26 miles west of St. George. The District’s service area lies within the
Town’s municipal boundary.

MAP OF APPLICANT’S LOCATION:

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

The District is requesting emergency funding to add an interconnecting service line,
consisting of a 4.5-mile pipeline, between the Apple Valley Water System and the Cedar
Point Water System. The District has this project as a top priority in the master plan that
was completed in July 2023. The emergency source capacity conditions in the Cedar
Point System have further increased the need to complete this connection as quickly as
possible.

This improvement uses the excess capacity in the Apple Valley System’s wells to
supplement the Cedar Point System’s capacity requirements. The line will provide
enough water to be the sole source for Cedar Point if Cedar Point’s wells were to go
down.

The Apple Valley System has historically had very low levels of radium. Therefore, this
interconnection will potentially allow the District to continue to operate the Cedar Point
System’s wells by blending the water received from the Apple Valley System, enabling
the distribution water to meet the regulatory requirements for radium.
Big Plains Water SSD
Big Plains Water SSD
February 29, 2024
Page 3

POPULATION GROWTH:
The District estimates growth over the next several years as follows.

Year Population Connections
Current 763 371
2030 1,211 484
2040 1,973 789
2050 3,148 1,596

COST ESTIMATE:

Legal/Bonding/Admin $26,600
Engineering - Planning $45,500
Engineering - Design $157,500
Engineering - CMS $227,800
Construction - $2,476,200
Other (land, etc.) $65,000
Contingency (~15%) $371,000
1% Loan Origination Fee $0
Total $3,370,000

COST ALLOCATION:

Funding Source Cost Sharing
Percent
of Project
DWB Loan (0.0%, 39-yrs) $2,020,000 60%
DWB Grant $1,350,000 40%
Local Contribution
Total $3,370,000 100%

IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
(Estimated completion dates for major milestones – add or delete rows as needed)

DWB Funding Authorization: Feb 2024
Complete Design Feb 2024
DDW Plan Approval: July 2024
Advertise for Bids: July 2024
Bid Opening: Aug 2024
Loan Closing: Aug 2024
Begin Construction: Sep 2024
Complete Construction: Feb 2025

IPS SUMMARY:

See attached reports.
Big Plains Water SSD
February 29, 2024
Page 4

CONTACT INFORMATION:

APPLICANT: Big Plains Water Special Service District
1777 N Meadowlark Ln.
Apple Valley, UT 84737
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

PRESIDING OFFICIAL &
CONTACT PERSON: Barrat Nielson
Board Chair
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

TREASURER/RECORDER: Jenna Vizcardo
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

CONSULTING ENGINEER: Nathan Wallentine
Sunrise Engineering, Inc.
11 North 300 West
Washington, UT 84780
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

CITY ATTORNEY: Ben Ruesch
Ruesch & Reeve
86 North 3400 West
Hurricane, UT 84737
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
DRINKING WATER BOARD FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE EVALUATION
SYSTEM NAME:Big Plains Water SSD FUNDING SOURCE:Federal SRF
COUNTY:Washington
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

60% Loan / 40% Grant
ESTIMATED POPULATION:763 NO. OF CONNECTIONS:446 * SYSTEM RATING:APPROVED
CURRENT AVG WATER BILL:$81.29 *PROJECT TOTAL:$3,370,000
CURRENT % OF AGI:2.55%FINANCIAL PTS:55 LOAN AMOUNT:$2,020,000
ESTIMATED MEDIAN AGI:$38,300 PRINC. FORGIVE.:$1,350,000
STATE AGI:$51,600 TOTAL REQUEST:$3,370,000
SYSTEM % OF STATE AGI:74.2%
@ ZERO % @ RBBI EQUIVALENT @ CALCULATED
RATE MKT RATE ANNUAL PAYMENT INTEREST RATE
0%3.59%#REF!**0.00%
SYSTEM
ASSUMED LENGTH OF DEBT, YRS:39 39 39 39
ASSUMED NET EFFECTIVE INT. RATE:0.00%3.59%#REF!0.00%
REQUIRED DEBT SERVICE:$51,794.87 $97,039.96 #REF!$51,794.87
*PARTIAL COVERAGE (15%):$0.00 $0.00 #REF!$0.00
*ADD. COVERAGE AND RESERVE (10%):$5,179.49 $9,704.00 #REF!$5,179.49
$127.75 $239.34 #REF!$127.75

O & M + FUNDED DEPRECIATION:$258,295.00 $258,295.00 $258,295.00 $258,295.00
OTHER DEBT + COVERAGE:$176,188.75 $176,188.75 $176,188.75 $176,188.75
REPLACEMENT RESERVE ACCOUNT:$22,552.04 $24,814.30 #REF!$22,552.04
ANNUAL EXPENSES PER CONNECTION:$1,024.74 $1,029.82 #REF!$1,024.74
$514,010.15 $566,042.00 #REF! $514,010.15
TAX REVENUE:$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
RESIDENCE
MONTHLY NEEDED WATER BILL:$96.04 $105.76 #REF!$96.04
% OF ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME:3.01% 3.31% #REF!3.01%

$0
4.5-mile Transmission Line
$0.00
ANNUAL NEW DEBT PER CONNECTION:
TOTAL SYSTEM EXPENSES
https://waterlink.utah.gov/reports.html?systemId=40 1/4
Contacts
Type: Administrative Contact
Name: BARRATT NIELSON
Office: 435-375-9270
Emergency:
Email:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Site Information
Legal Contact: BIG PLAINS SPECIAL
SERVICE DISTRICT
Address: 1777 N Meadowlark Dr ,
APPLE VALLEY, UT 84737
Phone: [phone]
County: WASHINGTON COUNTY
System Type: Community
Certification Required: SS
Total Population: 450
Site Updates
Last Inventory Update: 10/25/2023
Last Surveyor Update: 09/23/2021
Surveyor: JEREMY ROBERTS
Operating Period: 1/1 - 12/31
Last IPS Update: 02/01/2024 14:10:00
Political Districts
Representative: 71
Senate: 71
Water Usage Information per ERC
Total Ips Points: 120
Public Water System IPS ReportDEQ | Drinking Water
Big Plains Water Ssd - Apple Valley PWS ID: UTAH27069 Rating: Approved 03/12/2021 Status: Active

IPS SUMMARY Total IPS Points: 120
Admin & Physical Facilities Quality & Monitoring Significant Deficiency Violations
70 50 0
https://waterlink.utah.gov/reports.html?systemId=40 2/4
PHYSICAL FACILITY POINTS Total Pts: 70
Facility Facility Name Status Points Effective Details
DS001 UTAH27069 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM A 30 Hide Details ( 2 )
Code Description Severity Comments Determined
Date Pending Assessed
M007
CCC-LACKS ON-
GOING
ENFORCEMENT
IMPLEMENTATION
MIN CCC information is in the Apple Valley City Offices and
operator does not have access to records.09/23/2021 0 15
M006
CCC-LACKS WRITTEN
RECORDS OF CCC
ACTIVITIES
MIN CCC information is in the Apple Valley City Offices and
operator does not have access to records.09/23/2021 0 15
ST001 STORAGE FACILITY ST001 A 15 Hide Details ( 1 )
Code Description Severity Comments Determined
Date Pending Assessed
V021
STORAGE TANK ROOF
OR SIDEWALLS SHOW
SIGNS OF MILD OR
MODERATE
DETERIORATION
MIN The inside of the tank is deteriorating.09/23/2021 0 15
ST002 STORAGE FACILITY ST002 A 15 Hide Details ( 1 )
Code Description Severity Comments Determined
Date Pending Assessed
V021
STORAGE TANK ROOF
OR SIDEWALLS SHOW
SIGNS OF MILD OR
MODERATE
DETERIORATION
MIN The inside of the tank is deteriorating.09/23/2021 0 15
WS002 APPLE VALLEY WELL #2 A 5 Hide Details ( 1 )
Code Description Severity Comments Determined
Date Pending Assessed
SP04
ACTIVE SOURCE
LACKS APPROVED
UPDATES TO DWSP
PLAN
MIN 10/01/2018 0 5
WS003 WELL #1 REPLACEMENT A 5 Hide Details ( 1 )
Code Description Severity Comments Determined
Date Pending Assessed
SP04
ACTIVE SOURCE
LACKS APPROVED
UPDATES TO DWSP
PLAN
MIN 10/01/2018 0 5
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY VIOLATIONS Total Pts: 0
ID Violation Code Deficiency Determined Points Effective
https://waterlink.utah.gov/reports.html?systemId=40 3/4
LEAD COPPER MONITORING AND QUALITY VIOLATIONS Total Pts: 0
Violation No.Period Code Description/Name Points Effective
CHEMICAL MONITORING RULE VIOLATIONS Total Pts: 0
Facility Violation No Period Code Violation Type Analyte Group Determined Seasonality Points Effective
TREATMENT VIOLATIONS Total Pts: 0
Facility Violation No Period Code Violation Type Analyte Group Determined Points Effective
MICROBIAL RULE VIOLATIONS
Date Range Start: 01/01/2023
Total Pts: 50
Determine Date Compliance Period Code Violation Type Return To Compliance Points Effective
06/22/2023 04/01/2023 - 04/30/2023 3A MONITORING, ROUTINE, MAJOR (RTCR)N 25
01/21/2024 12/01/2023 - 12/31/2023 3A MONITORING, ROUTINE, MAJOR (RTCR)N 25
OPERATOR CERTIFICATION
Type Level Required Highest Certificate
Distribution Small System
Treatment
CONSUMER CONFIDENCE REPORT Total Effective Points: 0
Violation No.Period Code Description/Name Points Effective
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION VIOLATIONS Total Pts: 0
Violation No.Date Code Description/Name Points Effective
https://waterlink.utah.gov/reports.html?systemId=40 4/4
IPS COMPLIANCE SCHEDULES
Type Required Activities Severity Created Due
CCR SCHEDULES Submit Consumer Confidence Report 01/01/2024 07/01/2024
CCR SCHEDULES Submit CCR Certification Letter 01/01/2024 10/01/2024
Lead Copper Rule Revisions COMPLETE INITIAL LSL INVENTORY 12/16/2021 10/16/2024
Lead Copper Rule Revisions SUBMIT LEAD SERVICE LINE INVENTORY 12/16/2021 10/16/2024
https://waterlink.utah.gov/reports.html?systemId=251 1/3
Contacts
Type: Administrative Contact
Name: BARRATT NIELSON
Office: 435-375-9270
Emergency:
Email:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Site Information
Legal Contact: BIG PLAINS SPECIAL
SERVICE DISTRICT
Address: 1777 N Meadowlark Dr ,
APPLE VALLEY, UT 84737
Phone: [phone]
County: WASHINGTON COUNTY
System Type: Community
Certification Required: SS
Total Population: 62
Site Updates
Last Inventory Update: 10/25/2023
Last Surveyor Update: 09/19/2022
Surveyor: PAUL WRIGHT
Operating Period: 1/1 - 12/31
Last IPS Update: 02/01/2024 14:10:00
Political Districts
Representative: 0
Senate: 0
Water Usage Information per ERC
Total Ips Points: 125
Public Water System IPS ReportDEQ | Drinking Water
Big Plains Water Ssd - Canaan Ranch PWS ID: UTAH27093 Rating: Approved 03/14/2023 Status: Active

IPS SUMMARY Total IPS Points: 125
Admin & Physical Facilities Quality & Monitoring Significant Deficiency Violations
75 50 0
PHYSICAL FACILITY POINTS Total Pts: 75
Facility Facility Name Status Points Effective Details
DS001 UTAH27093 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM A 60 Hide Details ( 4 )
Code Description Severity Comments Determined
Date Pending Assessed
M003 CCC-LACKS LOCAL
AUTHORITY MIN 09/21/2007 0 15
M006
CCC-LACKS WRITTEN
RECORDS OF CCC
ACTIVITIES
MIN 12/11/2019 0 15
M007
CCC-LACKS ON-
GOING
ENFORCEMENT
IMPLEMENTATION
MIN 09/21/2007 0 15
VF34
SYSTEM LACKS
REQUIRED STORAGE
CAPACITY DUE TO
FIRE DEMAND BUT
HAS SOP FOR
FOLLOWING FIRE
INCIDENT
MIN 67% based on fire suppression 12/11/2019 0 15
WS001 CANAAN SPRINGS A 15 Hide Details ( 1 )
Code Description Severity Comments Determined
Date Pending Assessed
SS02 SPRING COLLECTION
AREA NOT FENCED MIN 09/21/2007 0 15
https://waterlink.utah.gov/reports.html?systemId=251 2/3
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY VIOLATIONS Total Pts: 0
ID Violation Code Deficiency Determined Points Effective
LEAD COPPER MONITORING AND QUALITY VIOLATIONS Total Pts: 0
Violation No.Period Code Description/Name Points Effective
CHEMICAL MONITORING RULE VIOLATIONS Total Pts: 0
Facility Violation No Period Code Violation Type Analyte Group Determined Seasonality Points Effective
TREATMENT VIOLATIONS Total Pts: 0
Facility Violation No Period Code Violation Type Analyte Group Determined Points Effective
MICROBIAL RULE VIOLATIONS
Date Range Start: 01/01/2023
Total Pts: 50
Determine Date Compliance Period Code Violation Type Return To Compliance Points Effective
06/22/2023 04/01/2023 - 04/30/2023 3A MONITORING, ROUTINE, MAJOR (RTCR)N 25
01/21/2024 12/01/2023 - 12/31/2023 3A MONITORING, ROUTINE, MAJOR (RTCR)N 25
OPERATOR CERTIFICATION
Type Level Required Highest Certificate
Distribution Small System
Treatment
CONSUMER CONFIDENCE REPORT Total Effective Points: 0
Violation No.Period Code Description/Name Points Effective
https://waterlink.utah.gov/reports.html?systemId=251 3/3
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION VIOLATIONS Total Pts: 0
Violation No.Date Code Description/Name Points Effective
IPS COMPLIANCE SCHEDULES
Type Required Activities Severity Created Due
CCR SCHEDULES Submit Consumer Confidence Report 01/01/2024 07/01/2024
CCR SCHEDULES Submit CCR Certification Letter 01/01/2024 10/01/2024
Revised Total Coliform Rule LVL1 TTT TC+/EC- WO RPTS 05/25/2023 06/25/2023
Lead Copper Rule Revisions COMPLETE INITIAL LSL INVENTORY 12/16/2021 10/16/2024
Lead Copper Rule Revisions SUBMIT LEAD SERVICE LINE INVENTORY 12/16/2021 10/16/2024
Lead Consumer Notice SUBMIT LCN CERTIFICATE 01/01/2021 09/28/2021
https://waterlink.utah.gov/reports.html?systemId=289 1/4
Contacts
Type: Administrative Contact
Name: BARRATT NIELSON
Office: 435-375-9270
Emergency:
Email:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Site Information
Legal Contact: BIG PLAINS SPECIAL
SERVICE DISTRICT
Address: 1777 N Meadowlark Dr ,
APPLE VALLEY, UT 84737
Phone: [phone]
County: WASHINGTON COUNTY
System Type: Community
Certification Required: SS
Total Population: 232
Site Updates
Last Inventory Update: 10/25/2023
Last Surveyor Update: 09/23/2021
Surveyor: JEREMY ROBERTS
Operating Period: 1/1 - 12/31
Last IPS Update: 02/01/2024 14:10:00
Political Districts
Representative: 71
Senate: 28
Water Usage Information per ERC
Total Ips Points: 255
Public Water System IPS ReportDEQ | Drinking Water
Big Plains Water Ssd - Cedar Point PWS ID: UTAH27089 Rating: Corrective Action 10/17/2023 Status: Active

IPS SUMMARY Total IPS Points: 255
Admin & Physical Facilities Quality & Monitoring Significant Deficiency Violations
30 175 50
https://waterlink.utah.gov/reports.html?systemId=289 2/4
PHYSICAL FACILITY POINTS Total Pts: 30
Facility Facility Name Status Points Effective Details
DS001 UTAH27089 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM A 30 Hide Details ( 3 )
Code Description Severity Comments Determined
Date Pending Assessed
M007
CCC-LACKS ON-
GOING
ENFORCEMENT
IMPLEMENTATION
MIN Not Provided 09/23/2021 0 15
M006
CCC-LACKS WRITTEN
RECORDS OF CCC
ACTIVITIES
MIN Not Provided 09/23/2021 0 15
S094
SYSTEM LACKS MORE
THAN 20% OF
REQUIRED SOURCE
CAPACITY
SIG Based on capacity calc worksheet the existing % is
42.9%.09/23/2021 50 0
WS004 WELL NO. 4 A 0 Hide Details ( 1 )
Code Description Severity Comments Determined
Date Pending Assessed
S001 UNAPPROVED
SOURCE IN SERVICE SIG SYSTEM LACK AN OPERATING PERMIT.07/05/2023 200 0
WS006 STOUT WELL P 0 Hide Details ( 1 )
Code Description Severity Comments Determined
Date Pending Assessed
SP06
NEW WATER
SOURCE LACKS
APPROVED PER
SIG 03/19/2019 0
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY VIOLATIONS Total Pts: 50
ID Violation Code Deficiency Determined
Points
Effective
DS001
45 FAILURE ADDRESS DEFICIENCY
(GWR)
S094
SYSTEM LACKS MORE THAN 20% OF REQUIRED
SOURCE CAPACITY
05/03/2023 50
LEAD COPPER MONITORING AND QUALITY VIOLATIONS Total Pts: 0
Violation No.Period Code Description/Name Points Effective
https://waterlink.utah.gov/reports.html?systemId=289 3/4
CHEMICAL MONITORING RULE VIOLATIONS Total Pts: 150
Facility
Violation
No
Period Code Violation Type
Analyte
Group
Determined Seasonality
Points
Effective
WS004
2024-
26535
10/01/2023 -
12/31/2023
02 MCL, AVERAGE RRAD 01/23/2024 P 50
WS002
2024-
26534
10/01/2023 -
12/31/2023
02 MCL, AVERAGE RRAD 01/23/2024 P 50
WS004
2024-
26533
10/01/2023 -
12/31/2023
03
MONITORING, ROUTINE
MAJOR
RRAD 01/23/2024 P 25
WS002
2024-
26532
10/01/2023 -
12/31/2023
03
MONITORING, ROUTINE
MAJOR
RRAD 01/23/2024 P 25
TREATMENT VIOLATIONS Total Pts: 0
Facility Violation No Period Code Violation Type Analyte Group Determined Points Effective
MICROBIAL RULE VIOLATIONS
Date Range Start: 01/01/2023
Total Pts: 25
Determine Date Compliance Period Code Violation Type Return To Compliance Points Effective
06/22/2023 04/01/2023 - 04/30/2023 3A MONITORING, ROUTINE, MAJOR (RTCR)N 25
OPERATOR CERTIFICATION
Type Level Required Highest Certificate
Distribution Small System
Treatment
CONSUMER CONFIDENCE REPORT Total Effective Points: 0
Violation No.Period Code Description/Name Points Effective
https://waterlink.utah.gov/reports.html?systemId=289 4/4
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION VIOLATIONS Total Pts: 0
Violation No.Date Code Description/Name Points Effective
IPS COMPLIANCE SCHEDULES
Type Required Activities Severity Created Due
CCR SCHEDULES Submit CCR Certification Letter 01/01/2024 10/01/2024
CCR SCHEDULES Submit Consumer Confidence Report 01/01/2024 07/01/2024
BCA COMPLIANCE SCHEDULES COLLECT AND SUBMIT TCR SAMPLE RESULTS 10/17/2023 04/01/2024
BCA COMPLIANCE SCHEDULES GWR CORRECT DEFICIENCY 30 DAYS SIG 10/17/2023 03/31/2024
BCA COMPLIANCE SCHEDULES GWR CORRECT DEFICIENCY 120 DAYS SIG 10/16/2023 03/31/2024
BCA COMPLIANCE SCHEDULES GWR CORRECT DEFICIENCY 120 DAYS SIG 10/16/2023 07/19/2019
Lead Consumer Notice SUBMIT LCN CERTIFICATE 06/01/2023 12/29/2023
Lead Copper Rule Revisions SUBMIT LEAD SERVICE LINE INVENTORY 12/16/2021 10/16/2024
Lead Copper Rule Revisions COMPLETE INITIAL LSL INVENTORY 12/16/2021 10/16/2024
Lead Consumer Notice SUBMIT LCN CERTIFICATE 06/01/2021 12/29/2021
Lead Consumer Notice SUBMIT LCN CERTIFICATE 01/01/2021 03/31/2022
Lead Consumer Notice SUBMIT LCN CERTIFICATE 06/01/2020 12/29/2020
Revised Total Coliform Rule SAMPLING SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL 01/01/2017 09/30/2017

Agenda Item
8(D)(i)(c)
Wilson Arch WSSSD
Presented to the Drinking Water Board
February 29,2024
DRINKING WATER BOARD
BOARD PACKET FOR CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE
APPLICANT’S REQUEST
Wilson Arch Water and Sewer Special Service District was authorized financial
assistance to replace and add new water lines,water meters,a booster pump,and new
30,000-gallon storage tank in the amount of $1,138,000.
This project scored 43.9 points on the Project Priority List.
STAFF COMMENTS
Wilson Arch WSSSD opened bids in January 2024 and the low bidder came in higher
than anticipated,so they would like to request additional funds in the amount of $360,000
to cover the increased cost of completing the project.
Based on both the current and estimated after-project after bill,the system qualifies to be
considered for additional subsidy.
Option
Loan/
PF Loan
Principal
Forgiveness Term
Interest/
HGA
Water
Bill
%Local
MAGI
Base 100 /0 $1,138,000 $0 30 yrs 3.02%$281.94 8.83%
Authorized
amount 50 /50 $569,000 $569,000 30 yrs 0%$161.25 5.05%
Additional
funding 50 /50 $749,000 $749,000 30 yrs 0%$179.34 5.62%
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Drinking Water Board authorize an increase in funding in the amount of
$360,000 for a total of a construction loan of $1,498,000 with $749,000 in principal
forgiveness to Wilson Arch Water and Sewer Special Service District,for a
repayable loan amount of $749,000 at 0%interest for 30 years for new water lines,
water meters,booster pump,and storage tank.
Wilson Arch WSSSD
February 29,2024
Page 2
APPLICANT’S LOCATION
Wilson Arch is in San Juan County,approximately 26 miles south of Moab.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The district recently had a water master plan and impact fee study completed by Sunrise
Engineering.The master plan report recommends that Wilson Arch SSD take immediate
action to increase fire flow on the east side of the system to meet requirements set forth
by the San Juan County Fire Marshal.To address this deficiency,the following would be
added:1000'of new 8"water distribution line;600'of new 4"water distribution line;
replace 1100'of existing 6"line with 8"distribution line;install a new booster pump.
Low booster pump capacity is the most significant factor limiting the system.
Wilson Arch WSSSD
February 29,2024
Page 3
The addition of an 8-inch diameter line that connects the west and east sides will have a
large impact on fire flow.Connecting the two sides will allow the large pumps on the
west side to help the east side.It will also make the water storage on the west side
available to the east side,which is important.Other improvements include adding water
meters on existing and new connections and installing new fire hydrants.One of the
proposed distribution lines will cross State Highway 191.The other lines,and pump will
be constructed on easements owned by the SSD.
Additionally,the master plan noted that Wilson Arch SSD will need to add 25,600
gallons (minimum)of culinary water storage by the year 2032 to accommodate projected
growth of Phase 1 development.The report recommended that Wilson Arch SSD add an
additional 30,000-gallon fiberglass storage tank and connect it to the current
30,000-gallon fiberglass tanks on the west side.Burying the tank will incur added cost
but will add a degree of security and will fall best in line with the community’s goal to
preserve scenery.If Wilson Arch SSD chooses to increase capacity by more than
30,000-gallons,the report recommends a concrete tank.
To meet fire storage requirements on its own,the east side would need a total of 60,000
gallons when it currently only has 20,000 gallons.By connecting the two sides,the
60,000 gallons of storage on the west side will become available to the east.Connecting
the two sides will also create greater redundancy,which adds a factor of safety should a
pump fail.
The estimated design life of the project components are as follows:
●New storage tank (fiberglass):30 years
●Waterlines:100 years
●Water meters:20 years
●New booster pump:15 years
POPULATION GROWTH
Projected population and connections for Wilson Arch over the next 20 years is based on
a 6.8%annual growth rate estimated in their application.
Year Population Connections
2022 27 19
2042 100 98
Wilson Arch WSSSD
February 29,2024
Page 4
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
DWB Authorization February 2024
Begin Design November 2022
DDW Plan Approval March 2023
Advertise for Bids April 2023
Bid Opening May 2023
Loan Closing April 2024
Begin Construction April 2024
Complete Construction/DDW Permit February 2025
COST ESTIMATE
Legal/Bonding $50,000
Engineering –Design/Pre-Project $97,400
Engineering –CMS $86,500
Construction -Mobilization $1,194,575
Contingency $69,525
Total Project Cost $1,498,000
COST ALLOCATION
Funding Source Cost Sharing Percent of Project
DWB Loan (30 yrs,0%)$749,000 50%
DWB Principal Forgiveness $749,000 50%
Total Amount $1,498,000 100%
IPS SUMMARY
Code Description Physical
Facilities
Quality
&
Monitoring
Significant
Deficiency
Violations
G001 Unapproved facility (West Side Pump)in ser vice Note:
final operating permit currently under review by DEQ
50
Total =50
Wilson Arch WSSSD
February 29,2024
Page 5
CONTACT INFORMATION
APPLICANT:Wilson Arch Water and Sewer Special
Service District
131 South Joe Wilson Drive
La Sal,UT 84530
PRESIDING OFFICIAL &Eric Linscheid
CONTACT PERSON:Chair
Telephone:[phone]
[e-mail]
CONSULTING ENGINEER:Devan Shields
Sunrise Engineering
25 East 500 North
Fillmore,UT 84631
[phone]
[e-mail]
TREASURER/RECORDER:Craig Simpson
Telephone:[phone]
[e-mail]
BOND ATTORNEY:TBD
DRINKING WATER BOARD FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE EVALUATION
SYSTEM NAME:Wilson Arch FUNDING SOURCE:Federal SRF
COUNTY:San Juan
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

50 % Loan & 50 % P.F.
ESTIMATED POPULATION:27 NO. OF CONNECTIONS:34 * SYSTEM RATING:APPROVED
CURRENT AVG WATER BILL:$85.00 *(ERC-R)PROJECT TOTAL:$1,498,000
CURRENT % OF AGI:2.66%FINANCIAL PTS:35 LOAN AMOUNT:$749,000
ESTIMATED MEDIAN AGI:$38,300 PRINC. FORGIVE.:$749,000
STATE AGI:$46,500 TOTAL REQUEST:$1,498,000
SYSTEM % OF STATE AGI:82%
@ ZERO % @ RBBI EQUIVALENT AFTER REPAYMENT
RATE MKT RATE ANNUAL PAYMENT PENALTY & POINTS
0%3.87%0.00%**0.00%
SYSTEM
ASSUMED LENGTH OF DEBT, YRS:30 30 30 30
ASSUMED NET EFFECTIVE INT. RATE:0.00%3.87%0.00%0.00%
REQUIRED DEBT SERVICE:$24,966.67 $42,633.66 $49,933.33 $24,966.67
*PARTIAL COVERAGE (15%):$3,745.00 $6,395.05 $7,490.00 $3,745.00
*ADD. COVERAGE AND RESERVE (10%):$2,496.67 $4,263.37 $4,993.33 $2,496.67
$924.69 $1,579.02 $1,849.38 $924.69

O & M + FUNDED DEPRECIATION:$41,425.00 $41,425.00 $41,425.00 $41,425.00
OTHER DEBT + COVERAGE:$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
REPLACEMENT RESERVE ACCOUNT:$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
ANNUAL EXPENSES PER CONNECTION:$1,227.41 $1,227.41 $1,227.41 $1,227.41
$72,633.33 $94,717.08 $41,425.00 $72,633.33
TAX REVENUE:$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
RESIDENCE
MONTHLY NEEDED WATER BILL:$179.34 $233.87 $256.40 $179.34
% OF ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME:5.62% 7.33% 8.03%5.62%

New tank, meters, booster pump, waterlines
ANNUAL NEW DEBT PER CONNECTION:
TOTAL SYSTEM EXPENSES
Agenda Item
7(D)(ii)(a)
Holden Town
Presented to the Drinking Water Board
February 29,2024
DRINKING WATER BOARD
BOARD PACKET FOR CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE
APPLICANT’S REQUEST:
Holden Town was authorized financial assistance on July 21,2022,to drill a new well,
install a transmission line,construct a new 500,000 gallon tank,redundant tank
distribution line,meter upgrades and upgrades to the chlorination.
This project scored 9.8 points on the Project Priority List.
The total project cost is $8,841,00.Holden Town will be contributing $150,000 towards
the project and is requesting the balance of $8,691,000 from the Drinking Water Board.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Holden Town has been working diligently to locate an alternate well site that would be
more favorable to drilling a new well.They are in talks with a property owner on either
purchasing or leasing the property for the well site.They are at 60%design for the
project,pending the finalization of the well site and would like to formally request an
extension of authorization while they work out the details.
Option Loan /PF
Principal
Forgiveness Loan Term
Interest
Rate
(HGA)
Water
Bill
%Local
MAGI
1 100%loan $0 $8,691,000 40 yrs 0%$119.20 3.21%
2 50/50 $4,341,000 $4,350,000 40 yrs 0%$77.18 2.08%
3 47/53 $3,500,000 $5,191,000 40 yrs 0%$85.32 2.30%
4 47/53 $3,500,000 $5,191,000 30 yrs 0%$102.07 2.75%
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
The Drinking Water Board authorize a one-year extension to the authorization to
Holden Town.
Holden Town
February 29,2024
Page 2
CONTACT INFORMATION:
APPLICANT:Holden Town
PO Box 127
56 North Main
Holden,Utah 84636
Telephone:[phone]
PRESIDING OFFICIAL &
CONTACT PERSON:Darren Fox,Mayor
56 North Main
Holden,Utah 84636
Telephone:[phone]
[e-mail]
TREASURER/RECORDER:Tyler Teuscher
801-669-1248
[e-mail]
CONSULTING ENGINEER:Jesse Ralphs
Sunrise Engineering
25 East 500 North
Fillmore,Utah 84631
Telephone:[phone]
[e-mail]
BOND ATTORNEY:Richard Chamberlain
Olsen &Chamberlain
225 North 100 East
Richfield,Utah 84701
435-896-4461

Agenda Item
8(D)(ii)(b)
Johnson Water Improvement District
Presented to the Drinking Water Board
February 29,2024
DRINKING WATER BOARD
BOARD PACKET FOR CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE
APPLICANT’S REQUEST:
Johnson Water Improvement District was authorized funding on July 21,2022,to install a
main line and upgrade water lines for the Independence area of the District.This project
addresses a public health issue and compliance issue.This project scored 4.8 points on
the Project Priority List.
The total project cost is estimated at $2,452,000.The District is contributing $100,000
towards this project and requests the full balance of $2,352,000 from the Drinking Water
Board.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Johnson Water ID and their engineer have been working on the environmental portion of
the project and have had some difficulty obtaining the rights-of-way and easements
through tribal land to complete the environmental work.They plan to have everything in
place so they can go out to bid this spring and therefore request an extension of
authorization while they complete the final requirements for SRF funding.
Option Loan /Grant
Principal
Forgiveness Loan Term
Interest
Rate/
HGA
Water
Bill
%Local
MAGI
1 0/100 $2,352,000 $0 yrs %$69.29 2.30%
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
The Drinking Water Board authorize a one year extension of funding to Johnson
Water Improvement District.
Johnson Water Improvement District
February 29,2024
Page 2
CONTACT INFORMATION:
APPLICANT:Johnson water Improvement District
3758 West UT-87
Roosevelt,Utah 84066
435-722-2620
PRESIDING OFFICIAL &
CONTACT PERSON:Dusty Monks,Chairman
3758 West UT-87
Roosevelt,Utah 84066
435-722-2620
[e-mail]
TREASURER/RECORDER:Karen Ashby
435-722-2620
CONSULTING ENGINEER:Jason Blankenagel
Sunrise Engineering
363 East Main,Suite 201
Vernal,Utah 84078
435-789-7364
[e-mail]

Agenda Item
8(D)(iii)(a)
Hidden Lake Association
Presented to the Drinking Water Board
February 29,2024
DRINKING WATER BOARD
BOARD PACKET FOR DEAUTHORIZATION
APPLICANT’S REQUEST:
On January 10,2023,the Drinking Water Board authorized a loan of $3,838,040 for 40
years at 0%interest to Hidden Lake Association to drill a new well,install approximately
18,000 feet of 4-inch distribution line and 600 feet of 8-inch distribution line,and to
install a 50,800-gallon concrete tank.
On January 22,2024,staff received an email from Hidden Lake Association indicating
that the system is not ready to move forward with a project at this time and requested that
the funding be deauthorized.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Drinking Water Board de-authorize the $3,838,040 loan for 40 years at 0%
interest to Hidden Lake Association.
1/29/24, 8:01 AM State of Utah Mail - Re: Hidden Lake SRF Project #3F1911 - Update Request
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c575030d0d&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-5430461617956448641%7Cmsg-f:17888335359732050…1/1
Allyson Spevak <[e-mail]>
Re: Hidden Lake SRF Project #3F1911 - Update Request
1 message
JoElla Horrocks <[e-mail]>Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 4:03 PM
To: Allyson Spevak <[e-mail]>
Cc: Terry Ulanch <[e-mail]>, Letizia Wetzel <[e-mail]>, Clark Hill <[e-mail]>, Michael
Grange <[e-mail]>, NORMAN and LINDA WILLIAMSON <[e-mail]>
Hi Allyson,
Thank you for the follow up.
Yes, the board did meet and we discussed de authorizing the loan and water project this year so that you can use it
elsewhere within the state.
We are not in a position to use it this year, but may want to in the future.
Thank you for staying in touch.
JoElla
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 22, 2024, at 8:12 AM, Allyson Spevak <[e-mail]> wrote:
Hi JoElla,
I am following up on our January 8 Zoom Meeting, wherein Letizia said that the HLA Board would discuss
deauthorizing the SRF Project at their January 13 meeting. As discussed during the January 8 meeting, it is
the Division's recommendation to deauthorize the funding at this time and reapply when Hidden Lake has
gathered the necessary water use data.
Was the project discussed? Did the Board decide on how to proceed?
Thank you,
--
Allyson Spevak
Environmental Scientist II-DWSRF Project Manager
Infrastructure Funding Section
Office: [phone]
Cell: [phone]
drinkingwater.utah.gov
Emails to and from this email address may be considered public records and thus subject to Utah GRAMA
requirements.

Agenda Item
8(D)(iv)(a)
American Rescue Plan Act –Disposition of Remaining Funds
Presented to the Drinking Water Board
February 29,2024
DRINKING WATER BOARD
BOARD PACKET FOR THE DISPOSITION
OF REMAINING ARPA ASSISTANCE FUNDS
STAFF COMMENTS:
On August 31,2022,the Drinking Water Board set aside $699,384 of remaining
American Rescue Plan Act funds appropriated to the Board by the state legislature.
These remaining funds were set aside as small grants for drinking water systems that
needed quick access to financial assistance to repair or replace infrastructure on an
emergency basis.As of the January 9,2024 Board meeting,$479,384 remains of the
initial $699,384.
As a reminder,Congress imposed strict time constraints on the ARPA funds,which are
that those funds must be obligated by December 31,2024,and fully spent by December
31,2026.“Obligated”is defined as the state has entered into a signed agreement with
the assistance recipient by December 31,2024,and we are interpreting “spent”to mean
that final reimbursement requests shall be submitted to the state no later than November
30,2026.
Based on these constraints,Staff is proposing that the remaining $479,384 be released
from its emergency set-aside status and be returned to the construction fund.The
funding returned will only be available to water systems that meet the criteria initially
established for ARPA funding,namely small,rural,disadvantaged systems.
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE COMMITTEE PROPOSAL:
The Drinking Water Board release the remaining $479,384 in American Rescue
Plan Act appropriation from the emergency set aside action of August 31,2022 and
return it to the Construction fund to be used for projects for eligible small,rural,
disadvantaged drinking water systems.