The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDAQ-2024-004199DRAFTBeehiveEmissionReductionPlan:Draft Priority Measures DRAFTTableofContents Priority Measures...........................................................................................................................4 Appendix A -Priority Measures.................................................................................................12 Transportation.................................................................................................................................12 Measure #1:Light-Duty Zero-Emission Vehicle Incentives..............................................12 Project #1 -Electric Vehicle Replacement Assistance Program (EVRAP).................12 Project #2 -Electric Vehicle Incentive Program............................................................15 Project #3 -Electric Fleet Program...................................................................................17 Measure #2 -Medium-and-Heavy-Duty Zero-Emission Vehicle Incentives.................20 Project #1 -Electric Delivery Vehicle Incentive Program............................................20 Project #2 -Electric Refuse Hauler Incentive Program................................................22 Project #3 -Electric School Bus Ready Program...........................................................25 Project #4 -Electric School Bus Pilot Program..............................................................27 Measure #3 -Light-Duty Zero-Emission Vehicle Charging /Refueling Incentives......31 Project #1:Electric Fleet Chargers....................................................................................31 Project #2 -Charging Alternatives (Workplace and Multi-Family Dwelling Electric Vehicle Chargers)..................................................................................................................33 Measure #4:Mode-Shifting /Reducing Vehicle Miles Traveled........................................37 Project #1 -E-Bike Incentive.............................................................................................37 Project #2 -Trail Development for Active Transportation..........................................39 Measure #5:Zero-Emission Non-Road Incentives..............................................................42 Project #1 -Electric Non-Road Equipment.....................................................................42 Project #2 -Electric Locomotives.....................................................................................44 Buildings............................................................................................................................................47 Measure #6:Energy Efficiency and Zero-Emission Technology......................................47 Project #1 -Whole Home Retrots Program...................................................................47 Project #2 -Residential Pre-Weatherization Program..................................................49 Project #3 -Residential Heat Pump Program.................................................................52 Project #4 -K-12 School/Public Building Program.......................................................55 Industrial...........................................................................................................................................56 Measure #7 -Facility Energy Efficiency................................................................................56 Project #1 -StepWise Industrial Assessment Program................................................56 Measure #8 -Oil/Gas Methane Emission Reductions........................................................58 Project #1 -Uinta Basin Oil/Gas Electrication Program............................................58 Project #2 -Uinta Basin Energy Recovery and Infrastructure Improvements........60 Project #3 -Uinta Basin Oil/Gas Thief Hatch Replacement Program.......................64 Project #4 -Uinta Basin Oil/Gas Flyover Program for Leak Detection.....................67 Electric Power...................................................................................................................................68 BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 2 of 83 DRAFTMeasure#9 -Renewable Energy.............................................................................................68 Project #1 -Community Choice Renewable Program..................................................68 Project #2 -Rooftop Solar Residential Incentive Program..........................................71 Natural and Working Lands..........................................................................................................73 Measure #10 -Promote Healthy and Resilient Forests......................................................74 Project #1 -Supporting Forest Management and Wildre Mitigation......................74 Cross-Cutting...................................................................................................................................76 Measure #11 -Energy Outreach,Education,and Workforce............................................76 Project #1 -Energy Demonstration and Assistance Program (One-Stop Shop).....76 Project #2 -Workforce Training........................................................................................79 Measure #12 -Carbon Sequestration and Storage..............................................................79 Project #1 -Utah Carbon Sequestration and Storage Survey.....................................79 BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 3 of 83 DRAFTPriorityMeasures The measures in this section have been identied as “priority measures”for which to pursue funding through the EPA Climate Pollution Reduction Grant (CPRG)program implementation grants.This list is not exhaustive of Utah’s priorities.Instead,the selected priority measures included in this Priority Plan meet the following criteria: ●The measure is implementation-ready,meaning that the design work for the policy, program,or project is complete enough that a full scope of work and budget can be included in a CPRG implementation grant application. ●The measure can be completed in the near term,meaning that all funds will be expended,and the project completed,within the ve-year performance period for the CPRG implementation grants (approximately October 2024 through October 2029). ●The measure has a broad level of stakeholder support. ●The measure advances or is otherwise consistent with state of Utah priorities as identied in past climate,energy,and natural resource planning efforts ,including:1 o Any-of-the-above approach o Market-based o Innovative o Cost-effective o Reliable and affordable energy o Incentives over mandates o Involve local leaders/decision-makers The Table below summarizes Utah’s list of 12 priority measures from the following sectors: transportation,buildings,industrial,electric power,natural and working lands,and cross-cutting.Each of these measures includes one or more implementation-ready example projects that would help achieve the objectives of the broader measure in question.Example projects were developed based on assumptions regarding the total estimated budget request,incentive or deployment funding levels,projected number of units deployed,and other key parameters in order to estimate emission reductions, facilitate general and LIDAC benets analyses,and assess other required plan elements. The lists of example projects for each measure are illustrative in nature and 1 Examples of such planning initiatives include: ●Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategies in Utah:An Economic and Policy Analysis -Utah Office of Energy and Resource Planning (2000) ●Governor’s Blue Ribbon Advisory Council on Climate Change (2007) ●The Utah Roadmap:Positive solutions on climate and air quality -Kem C.Gardner Policy Institute (2020) ●One Utah Roadmap -Governor Cox (January 19,2021) ●State and County Resource Management Plans (January 9,2023) ●Utah Energy and Innovation Plan -Utah Office of Energy Development (May 10,2022) BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 4 of 83 DRAFTnon-exhaustive and,as such,entities eligible to pursue implementation grants for measures that stem from this Priority Plan may develop their own unique projects that would help achieve the objectives of each measure. BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 5 of 83 Utah Priority Plan Measures Priority Measure/Project Cumulative GHG emission reductions MMT CO2e) Potential Implementing Agencies Potential Partners Geographic Scope 2025–2030 2025–2050 Transportation Measure #1:Light-Duty Zero-Emission Vehicle Incentives Project #1 -Electric Vehicle Replacement Assistance Program EVRAP 8,886.8 26,660.4 UDAQ,Local Health Departments/ counties Local Health Departments/ counties, dealerships, vehicle recyclers Salt Lake, Davis,Weber, Cache,Utah counties Project #2 -Electric Vehicle Incentive Program 23,136.8 69,410.5 UDAQ other agencies State Project #3 -Electric Fleet Program 2,024.5 6,941.1 UDAQ municipalities and other public/govern ment entities State Measure #2 -Medium-and-Heavy-Duty Zero-Emission Vehicle Incentives Project #1 -Electric Delivery Vehicle Incentive Program 1,528.0 4,365.7 UDAQ other private and government entities State Project #2 -Electric Refuse Hauler Incentive Program 335.4 1,006.3 UDAQ other private and government entities State Project #3 -Electric School Bus Ready Program 701.1 4,006.1 UDAQ School Districts State Project #4 -Electric School Bus Pilot Program 467.4 2,670.8 UDAQ School Districts State Measure #3 -Light-Duty Zero-Emission Vehicle Charging/Refueling Incentives Project #1:Electric Fleet Chargers 4,000.5 11,429.9 UDAQ, municipalities, Local Health Departments/ counties other private and government entities State DRAFTBEEHIVEEMISSIONREDUCTIONPLAN•PRIORITY PLAN 6 of 83 Utah Priority Plan Measures Priority Measure/Project Cumulative GHG emission reductions MMT CO2e) Potential Implementing Agencies Potential Partners Geographic Scope 2025–2030 2025–2050 Project #2 - Charging Alternatives (Workplace and Multi-Family Dwelling Electric Vehicle Chargers) 8,504.8 24,299.5 UDAQ UCAIR, municipalities and/or relevant stakeholders State Measure #4:Mode-Shifting/Reducing Vehicle Miles Traveled Project #1 -EBike Incentive 1,188.0 2,969.9 UDAQ UCAIR State Project #2 -Trail Development for Active Transportation 940.9 10,349.4 UDOT Washington and Kane counties Measure #5:Zero-Emission Non-Road Incentives Project #1 -Electric Non-Road Equipment More information needed More information needed UDAQ equipment operators State Project #2 -Electric Locomotives More information needed More information needed UDAQ locomotive operators Buildings Measure #6:Energy Eiciency and Zero-Emission Technology Project #1 -Whole Home Retrofits Program 6,560.8 37,490.0 Utah Oice of Energy Development UOED State Project #2 - Residential Pre-Weatherization Program 492.6 2,463.0 Utah Department of Workforce Services UDWS State Project #3 - Residential Heat Pump Program 5,059.3 28,910.0 UDWS RMP State Project #4 -K-12 School/Public Building Program More information needed More information needed UDAQ,UOED School Districts State Industrial Measure #7 -Facility Energy Eiciency DRAFTBEEHIVEEMISSIONREDUCTIONPLAN•PRIORITY PLAN 7 of 83 Utah Priority Plan Measures Priority Measure/Project Cumulative GHG emission reductions MMT CO2e) Potential Implementing Agencies Potential Partners Geographic Scope 2025–2030 2025–2050 Project #1 - StepWise Industrial Assessment Program 101,457.0 202,914.0 University of Utah IIAC Facility owners/ operators State Measure #8 -Oil/Gas Methane Emission Reductions Project #1 -Uinta Basin Oil/Gas Electrification Program More information needed More information needed UDAQ Moon Lake Electric, operators Uinta Basin Project #2 -Uinta Basin Energy Recovery and Infrastructure Improvements More information needed More information needed EGI Operators Uinta Basin Project #3 -Uinta Basin Oil/Gas Thief Hatch Replacement Program Oil:51,875.3; Gas:33,939.2 Oil:148,215.0; Gas:96,969.0 UDAQ Tank owners/ operators Uinta Basin Project #4 -Uinta Basin Oil/Gas Flyover Program for Leak Detection More information needed More information needed UDAQ Aerial monitoring services,USU Uinta Basin Electric Power Measure #9 -Renewable Energy Project #1 - Community Choice Renewable Program More information needed More information needed Salt Lake City, Utah Renewable Communities RMP, renewable project developers 18 communi- ties throughout Utah Project #2 -Rooftop Solar Residential Incentive Program 146,093.1 730,465.4 UOED homeowners State Natural and Working Lands Measure #10 -Promote Healthy and Resilient Forests Project #1 -Forest Management and Wildfire Mitigation Program More information needed More information needed UDAQ,UDFFSL Other western states More information needed, potentially Western States Coalition Cross-Cuing Measure #11 -Energy Outreach,Education,and Workforce DRAFTPleasenotethat,to the extent possible,estimated emission reductions for measure example projects included in this Priority Plan are net of any increases in emissions that may be associated with a given measure.For example,emission reductions for projects that replace direct fossil fuel combustion with equipment electrication (e.g.,electric vehicles,EV chargers,and heat pumps)have been adjusted or “netted”to account for the increase in electricity generation emissions associated with the project in question using recognized quantication tools such as AVERT or eGRID.However,because these tools use emissions associated with the recent/actual electric generation mix,such net emissions reduction estimates are inherently conservative,since the electricity grid is slated to become increasingly clean over the Priority Plan planning period (i.e.,2025-2050).This anticipated change in electricity sector CO2e emissions is reected in the U.S.Department of Energy,Energy Information Administration (EIA)AEO2023 Issues in Focus:Ination Reduction Act Cases in the AEO2023 ,which estimates a 57-75%reduction in electricity2 sector emissions between 2005 and 2050 depending on the level of uptake for Ination Reduction Act provisions,as shown in the gure below. 2 Source:https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/IIF_IRA/pdf/IRA_IIF.pdf BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 8 of 83 Utah Priority Plan Measures Priority Measure/Project Cumulative GHG emission reductions MMT CO2e) Potential Implementing Agencies Potential Partners Geographic Scope 2025–2030 2025–2050 Project #1 -Energy Demonstration and Assistance Program (One-Stop Shop) More information needed More information needed UDAQ,State colleges and universities third-party organizations State Project #2 - Workforce Training More information needed More information needed UDAQ State Measure #12 -Carbon Sequestration and Storage Project #1 -Utah Carbon Sequestration and Storage Survey More information needed More information needed UDAQ,EGI Emiing facilities, direct air capture projects Iron and Beaver counties DRAFTEvenmoredramaticistheprojectedincreaseinwindandsolarcapacityandassociated decrease in GHG emissions from PaciCorp’s 2023 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP),as3 illustrated in the charts below. 3 Source: https://www.pacicorp.com/content/dam/pcorp/documents/en/pacicorp/energy/integrated-resource-plan /2023-irp/2023_IRP_Volume_I.pdf BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 9 of 83 DRAFTActualnetemissionreductionsforelectrication measures are,therefore,likely to be larger than the estimates shown in this Priority Plan. BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 10 of 83 DRAFTDetailedwrite-ups for each measure and its example projects can be found in Appendix A of this Priority Plan.These write-ups include measure-specic assessments related to several required plan elements,including benets analysis (i.e.,co-pollutant emission reductions),LIDAC benets analysis,review of authority to implement,and intersection with other funding. BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 11 of 83 DRAFTAppendixA-Priority Measures Transportation Measure #1:Light-Duty Zero-Emission Vehicle Incentives This measure aims to voluntarily increase adoption of light-duty zero-emission vehicles in use in Utah.Potential nancial incentives could include point of sale rebates,ongoing grants,and technical assistance navigating incentives and could be scaled and/or otherwise qualied based on income .Below are specic examples of types of projects that4 could advance this measure. Project #1 -Electric Vehicle Replacement Assistance Program (EVRAP) 1.Project Description Use CPRG funds to create a proposed light-duty income-qualied incentive,EVRAP (Electric Vehicle Replacement Assistance Program),for individuals.The Vehicle Repair and Replacement Assistance Program (VRRAP)is currently administered in the State of Utah through the Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ),Division of Air Quality (UDAQ)and Local Health Departments to help repair or replace internal combustion engine (ICE)vehicles that fail inspection and maintenance (I/M)program emissions tests.Unlike the existing VRRAP program,the implementation of a new Electric Vehicle Replacement Assistance Program (EVRAP)in Utah would exclusively focus on replacing high-polluting vehicles with new or used electric vehicles for income-qualied Utahns in I/M Counties:Salt Lake,Davis,Weber,Cache,and Utah.Such incentives could potentially be extended to all counties throughout the state through an income-based mechanism similar to that employed by the Vehicle Exchange Colorado (VXC)program. 2.Estimate of GHG and criteria pollutant emissions reductions UDAQ estimated GHG and criteria pollutant emission reductions based on assumptions made for an example program that would incentivize and deploy 1,000 vehicles.Actual emissions reductions will vary depending on selected program parameters. GHG and Criteria Emissions Reductions (metric tons) NOx SO2 PM2.5 VOCs NH3 CO2e By 2030 8.0 -0.2 0.1 10.3 1.7 8,886.8 4 Examples of similar programs include:Texas,Colorado,and California. BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 12 of 83 DRAFTBy205024.1 -0.5 0.4 30.8 5.2 26,660.4 Quantication tool(s)utilized:AVERT 3.Implementing agency or agencies As envisioned,UDAQ would be the lead agency and would sub-contract/partner with Local Health Departments,although other eligible entities in Utah could apply for and administer a similar income-qualied program not tied directly to I/M testing (see Vehicle Exchange Colorado (VXC)for an example). 4.Review of authority to implement Under Utah Code 19-1-201,the department [UDEQ]may perform the administrative functions of the boards established by Section 19-1-106,including the acceptance and administration of grants from the federal government and from other sources,public or private,to carry out the board's functions.Also under Utah Code 19-1-202,the [UDEQ] executive director may,with the approval of the governor,participate in the distribution, disbursement,or administration of any fund or service,advanced,offered,or contributed by the federal government for purposes consistent with the powers and duties of the department. Utah Code 19-1-105,creates the Utah Division of Air Quality to administer 19-2,Air Conservation Act.Under Utah Code 19-2-107,the [UDAQ]director may accept,receive,and administer grants or other funds or gifts from public and private agencies,including the federal government,for the purpose of carrying out any of the functions of the Air Conservation Act.Furthermore,UDAQ is eligible to apply for assistance under this solicitation,in accordance with 42 U.S.C.16131 and CFDA 66.039. Under this authority,UDAQ has administered clean vehicle and equipment incentive programs for over two decades. 5.Implementation schedule and milestones Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 200 units 200 units 200 units 200 units 200 units 6.Geographic location Implementation in Salt Lake,Davis,Weber,Cache,Utah counties. 7.Funding sources a.Funding needed to implement:$5,750,000 b.Complementary Funding: ●IRA 13401:Qualied Clean Vehicle Credit ●IRA 13402:Used Clean Vehicle Credit BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 13 of 83 DRAFT●IRA 60103 -Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund -Clean Communities Investment Accelerator ●EPA Targeted Airshed Grant (TAG)funding for VRRAP in Cache,Salt Lake, Davis,and Weber counties c.Funding pursued by state or secured for implementation of this project: ●EPA TAG funding for VRRAP in Cache,Salt Lake,Davis,and Weber counties d.How additional implementation grant dollars are necessary to fund the measure: ●EPA Targeted Airshed Grant funding is nearly expended in Cache County,and Utah County did not qualify for TAG VRRAP support;the remaining counties’ programs could be extended with CPRG support. ●Specic criteria of the existing Qualied Clean Vehicle Credit and Used Clean Vehicle Credit may keep individuals from purchasing. ●EVs are too expensive and tax credits are not as accessible for most low-income households,so this program provides additional support to extend EVs to LIDAC communities. 8.Metrics for tracking progress For this measure,we use the following metrics to track progress:number of vehicles replaced/deployed,vehicle life,and number of performance years for implementation in order to quantify emissions reductions. 9.Quantitative cost estimates UDAQ assumed total deployment of 1,000 units at an incentive level of $5,000/unit,for a total incentive budget of $5,000,000,to which 15%in administrative expenses were added, for a total project budget of $5,750,000.Future implementation grant proposals from eligible entities,including UDAQ,may vary depending on selected project parameters. 10.LIDAC Benets/Analysis A new EVRAP program would be for low-income residents who live in I/M counties of Utah (Salt Lake,Davis,Weber,Cache,Utah counties).All of these I/M counties include disadvantaged areas according to the IRA Disadvantaged Communities map.As an income-qualied program,EVRAP intends to target the low-income population in Utah that is typically less nancially able to purchase EVs. In addition to the general LIDAC benets associated with measures (see the LIDAC Analysis section of this Priority Plan)potential benets unique to this measure accrue to Utah’s I/M counties,including: ●Reduced level of NOx,PM2.5,VOCs,NH3 shown in this project’s Section 2 table; ●Increased access to transportation options for LIDAC individuals; ●Lower cost of maintenance and cost of charging (compared to an ICE vehicle’s maintenance and cost of gasoline)for LIDAC individuals; ●Reduced noise pollution. BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 14 of 83 DRAFTApotentialuniquedisbenet (identied by LIDAC stakeholders)is the high initial cost of an EV/lack of ability for low-income families to access EVs.This program intends to mitigate this by providing an additional nancial incentive and allowing the purchase of both new or used EVs.For detailed information about UDAQ LIDAC engagement,see the Outreach and Coordination section of this Priority Plan. Project #2 -Electric Vehicle Incentive Program 1.Project Description Use CPRG funds to create a general EV incentive program for the public.Potential nancial incentives could include point-of-sale rebates,ongoing grants,and technical assistance navigating incentives.The new general EV incentive program would be open to all state of Utah residents. 2.Estimate of GHG and criteria pollutant emissions reductions UDAQ estimated GHG and criteria pollutant emission reductions based on assumptions made for an example program that would incentivize and deploy 4,000 units.Actual emissions reductions will vary depending on selected program parameters. GHG and Criteria Emissions Reductions (metric tons) NOx SO2 PM2.5 VOCs NH3 CO2e By 2030 1.0 -0.7 0.1 9.4 2.8 23,136.8 By 2050 3.0 -2.1 0.3 28.2 8.4 69,410.5 Quantication tool(s)utilized:AVERT 3.Implementing agency or agencies As envisioned,UDAQ would be the lead agency and could sub-contract/partner with other agencies to administer the program,although other eligible entities in Utah could apply for and administer this or a similar program. 4.Review of authority to implement Under Utah Code 19-1-201,the department [UDEQ]may perform the administrative functions of the boards established by Section 19-1-106,including the acceptance and administration of grants from the federal government and from other sources,public or private,to carry out the board's functions.Also under Utah Code 19-1-202,the [UDEQ] executive director may,with the approval of the governor,participate in the distribution, disbursement,or administration of any fund or service,advanced,offered,or contributed by the federal government for purposes consistent with the powers and duties of the department. Utah Code 19-1-105,creates the Utah Division of Air Quality to administer 19-2,Air Conservation Act.Under Utah Code 19-2-107,the [UDAQ]director may accept,receive,and BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 15 of 83 DRAFTadministergrantsorotherfundsorgiftsfrompublicandprivateagencies,including the federal government,for the purpose of carrying out any of the functions of the Air Conservation Act.Furthermore,UDAQ is eligible to apply for assistance under this solicitation,in accordance with 42 U.S.C.16131 and CFDA 66.039. Under this authority,UDAQ has administered clean vehicle and equipment incentive programs for over two decades. 5.Implementation schedule and milestones Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 800 units 800 units 800 units 800 units 800 units 6.Geographic location Statewide implementation. 7.Funding sources a.Funding needed to implement:$11,500,000 b.Complementary Funding: ●IRA 13401:Qualied Clean Vehicle Credit ●IRA 13402:Qualied Used Clean Vehicle Credit ●IRA 60103 -Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund -Clean Communities Investment Accelerator c.Funding pursued by state or secured for implementation of this project: ●None. d.How additional implementation grant dollars are necessary to fund the measure: ●There is no existing state-specic funding for this project. ●Specic criteria of existing Qualied Clean Vehicle Credit and Used Clean Vehicle Credit may keep individuals from purchasing. ●EVs are too expensive for most individuals,and this program may lighten the burden for individuals otherwise unable to purchase an EV. 8.Metrics for tracking progress For this measure,we use the following metrics to track progress:number of vehicles deployed,vehicle life,and number of performance years for implementation in order to quantify emissions reductions. 9.Quantitative cost estimates UDAQ assumed total deployment of 4,000 units at an incentive level of $2,500/unit,for a total incentive budget of $10,000,000,to which 15%in administrative expenses were added,for a total project budget of $11,500,000.Future implementation grant proposals from eligible entities,including UDAQ,may vary depending on selected project parameters. BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 16 of 83 DRAFT10.LIDAC Benets/Analysis A new general EV incentive program would be open to all Utah residents.Funding could be prioritized to moderate-income households,who may not be eligible for the EVRAP program.Many parts of Utah include disadvantaged areas according to the IRA Disadvantaged Communities map. In addition to the general LIDAC benets associated with measures (see the LIDAC Analysis section of this Priority Plan)potential benets unique to this measure include: ●Reduced level of NOx,PM2.5,VOCs,NH3 shown in this project’s Section 2 table; ●Increased access to transportation options for Utah residents; ●Lower cost of maintenance and cost of charging,compared to an ICE vehicle’s maintenance and cost of gasoline,for individuals; ●Reduced noise pollution. Potential unique disbenets (identied by LIDAC stakeholders)include the high initial cost of an EV and the lack of practical vehicle alternatives for rural applications,i.e.,the need for larger trucks/vehicles for agricultural activities in those areas.This program intends to mitigate the former,by providing an additional nancial incentive for EVs.For detailed information about UDAQ LIDAC engagement,see the Outreach and Coordination section of this Priority Plan. Project #3 -Electric Fleet Program 1.Project Description Use CPRG funds to create a proposed EV incentive program for incremental cost incentives for commercial and government light-duty eets.Potential nancial incentives could include ongoing grants and technical assistance navigating incentives. This could be developed as a new program or could build upon/scale up the existing Clean Fuels and Emission Reduction Technology Program (CFERT),which among other provisions provides incentives for clean vehicles and vehicle refueling /charging infrastructure for commercial and government eets. 2.Estimate of GHG and criteria pollutant emissions reductions UDAQ estimated GHG and criteria pollutant emission reductions based on assumptions made for an example program that would incentivize and deploy 400 vehicles.Actual emissions reductions will vary depending on selected program parameters. GHG and Criteria Emissions Reductions (metric tons) NOx SO2 PM2.5 VOCs NH3 CO2e By 2030 0.1 -0.1 0.0 0.8 0.2 2,024.5 BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 17 of 83 DRAFTBy20500.3 -0.2 0.0 -2.8 0.8 6,941.1 Quantication tool(s)utilized:AVERT 3.Implementing agency or agencies As envisioned,UDAQ would be the lead agency and would subcontract/partner with municipalities and other public/government entities in the state,although other eligible entities in Utah could apply for and administer this or a similar program. 4.Review of authority to implement Under Utah Code 19-1-201,the department [UDEQ]may perform the administrative functions of the boards established by Section 19-1-106,including the acceptance and administration of grants from the federal government and from other sources,public or private,to carry out the board's functions.Also under Utah Code 19-1-202,the [UDEQ] executive director may,with the approval of the governor,participate in the distribution, disbursement,or administration of any fund or service,advanced,offered,or contributed by the federal government for purposes consistent with the powers and duties of the department. Utah Code 19-1-105,creates the Utah Division of Air Quality to administer 19-2,Air Conservation Act.Under Utah Code 19-2-107,the [UDAQ]director may accept,receive,and administer grants or other funds or gifts from public and private agencies,including the federal government,for the purpose of carrying out any of the functions of the Air Conservation Act.Furthermore,UDAQ is eligible to apply for assistance under this solicitation,in accordance with 42 U.S.C.16131 and CFDA 66.039. Under this authority,UDAQ has administered clean vehicle and equipment incentive programs for over two decades. 5.Implementation schedule and milestones Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Project development 100 units 100 units 100 units 100 units 6.Geographic location Statewide implementation. 7.Funding sources a.Funding needed to implement:$2,300,000 b.Complementary Funding: ●IIJA 40109 -State Energy Program ●IRA 70002 -U.S.Postal Service Clean Fleets ●IRA 13403:Qualied Commercial Clean Vehicle Credit BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 18 of 83 DRAFTc.Funding pursued by state or secured for implementation of this project: ●UDAQ Conversion to Alternative Fuel Grant Program ●IRA 13403:Qualied Commercial Clean Vehicle Credit d.How additional implementation grant dollars are necessary to fund the measure: ●The CFERT program’s Conversion to Alternative Fuel Grant Program Fund has been expended,but the program could be extended and potentially augmented through CPRG funding. ●Specic criteria of existing Qualied Commercial Clean Vehicle Credit may keep individuals from purchasing. 8.Metrics for tracking progress For this measure,we use the following metrics to track progress:number of government eet electric vehicles deployed,vehicle life,and number of performance years for implementation in order to quantify emissions reductions. 9.Quantitative cost estimates UDAQ assumed total deployment of 400 units at an incentive level of $5,000/unit,for a total incentive budget of $2,000,000,to which 15%in administrative expenses were added, for a total project budget of $2,300,000.Future implementation grant proposals from eligible entities,including UDAQ,may vary depending on selected project parameters. 10.LIDAC Benets/Analysis This new light-duty EV incentive program would be for government eets within Utah, including those of municipalities.Many municipalities in Utah include disadvantaged areas according to the IRA Disadvantaged Communities map. In addition to the general LIDAC benets associated with measures (see the LIDAC Analysis section of this Priority Plan)potential benets unique to this measure include: ●Reduced level of NOx,VOCs,NH3 shown in this project’s Section 2 table; ●Lower cost of maintenance and cost of charging,compared to an ICE vehicle’s maintenance and cost of gasoline,for government eets; ●Reduced noise pollution. For detailed information about UDAQ LIDAC engagement,see the Outreach and Coordination section of this Priority Plan. BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 19 of 83 DRAFTMeasure#2 -Medium-and-Heavy-Duty Zero-Emission Vehicle Incentives This measure intends to voluntarily increase eet adoption of medium-duty and heavy-duty Zero-Emission Vehicles in Utah.Potential formats of the program include vouchers,grants,and technical assistance navigating incentives.Below are specic examples of types of projects for this measure. Project #1 -Electric Delivery Vehicle Incentive Program 1.Project Description Use CPRG funds to create an incentive program for electric Class 5 delivery vehicles for commercial and government eets.Potential formats of the program include vouchers,tax credits/exemptions,grants,and technical assistance for navigating incentives. 2.Estimate of GHG and criteria pollutant emissions reductions UDAQ estimated GHG and criteria pollutant emission reductions based on assumptions made for an example program that would incentivize and deploy 40 Medium-Duty vehicles.Actual emissions reductions will vary depending on selected program parameters. GHG and Criteria Emissions Reductions (metric tons) NOx SO2 PM2.5 VOCs NH3 CO2e By 2030 0.1 -0.2 1,528.0 By 2050 0.8 -0.9 4,365.7 Quantication tool(s)utilized:Diesel Emission Quantier,eGRID 3.Implementing agency or agencies As envisioned,UDAQ would be the lead agency and would establish an incentive program for commercial and government entities in the state,although other eligible entities in Utah could apply for and administer this or a similar program. 4.Review of authority to implement Under Utah Code 19-1-201,the department [UDEQ]may perform the administrative functions of the boards established by Section 19-1-106,including the acceptance and administration of grants from the federal government and from other sources,public or private,to carry out the board's functions.Also under Utah Code 19-1-202,the [UDEQ] executive director may,with the approval of the governor,participate in the distribution, disbursement,or administration of any fund or service,advanced,offered,or contributed by the federal government for purposes consistent with the powers and duties of the department. BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 20 of 83 DRAFTUtahCode19-1-105,creates the Utah Division of Air Quality to administer 19-2,Air Conservation Act.Under Utah Code 19-2-107,the [UDAQ]director may accept,receive,and administer grants or other funds or gifts from public and private agencies,including the federal government,for the purpose of carrying out any of the functions of the Air Conservation Act.Furthermore,UDAQ is eligible to apply for assistance under this solicitation,in accordance with 42 U.S.C.16131 and CFDA 66.039. Under this authority,UDAQ has administered clean vehicle and equipment incentive programs for over two decades. 5.Implementation schedule and milestones Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Program development 10 units 10 units 10 units 10 units 6.Geographic location Statewide implementation. 7.Funding sources a.Funding needed to implement:$2,300,000 b.Complementary Funding: ●IRA 60101 -Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicle Program ●IIJA 21202 -Local and Regional Project Assistance Grants (RAISE) ●IRA 13403 -Commercial Clean Vehicle Tax Credit (45W ) ●IRA 60103 -Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund -Clean Communities Investment Accelerator ●IIJA 40552 -Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program (EECBG) ●IRA 60201 -Environmental and Climate Justice Block Grants -Change Grants ●IIJA 40109 -State Energy Program ●IIJA 40401 -Department of Energy Loan Programs ●IIJA Division J Title VIII -Port Infrastructure Development Program Grants ●IRA 70002 -U.S.Postal Service Clean Fleets ●IRA 60104 -EPA Diesel Emissions Reduction Act (DERA)funding ●EPA Targeted Airshed Grants (TAG) c.Funding pursued by state or secured for implementation of this project: ●IRA 60104 -EPA Diesel Emissions Reduction Act (DERA)funding ●EPA Targeted Airshed Grants ●Alternative Fuel Heavy-Duty Vehicle Tax Credit d.How additional implementation grant dollars are necessary to fund the measure: ●Over saturation ●Scrappage requirements deter BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 21 of 83 DRAFT●EMY/other eligibility requirements deter ●Extend existing programs (Clean Fuels) 8.Metrics for tracking progress For this measure,we use the following metrics to track progress:number of Class 5 vehicles deployed,vehicle life,and number of performance years for implementation in order to quantify emissions reductions. 9.Quantitative cost estimates UDAQ assumed total deployment of 40 units at an incentive level of $50,000/unit,for a total incentive budget of $2,000,000,to which 15%in administrative expenses were added, for a total project budget of $2,300,000.Future implementation grant proposals from eligible entities,including UDAQ,may vary depending on selected project parameters. 10.LIDAC Benets/Analysis Many parts of Utah include disadvantaged areas according to the IRA Disadvantaged Communities map.This medium-duty electric vehicle incentive program could prioritize funding in LIDAC areas of Utah,which are often also non-attainment areas. In addition to the general LIDAC benets associated with measures (see the LIDAC Analysis section of this Priority Plan)potential benets unique to this measure include: ●Reduced level of NOx,shown in this project’s Section 2 table; ●Lower cost of maintenance and cost of charging,compared to an ICE vehicle’s maintenance and cost of gasoline,for eets; ●Reduced noise pollution. For detailed information about UDAQ LIDAC engagement,see the Outreach and Coordination section of this Priority Plan. Project #2 -Electric Refuse Hauler Incentive Program 1.Project Description Use CPRG funds to create an incentive program for Class 8 refuse haulers for commercial and government eets.Potential formats of the program include vouchers,tax credits/ exemptions,grants,and technical assistance for navigating incentives. 2.Estimate of GHG and criteria pollutant emissions reductions UDAQ estimated GHG and criteria pollutant emission reductions based on assumptions made for an example program that would incentivize and deploy six Class 8 EV refuse haulers.Actual emissions reductions will vary depending on selected program parameters. GHG and Criteria Emissions Reductions (metric tons) NOx SO2 PM2.5 VOCs NH3 CO2e BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 22 of 83 DRAFTBy20300.5 -0.1 0.0 335.4 By 2050 1.5 -0.4 0.0 1,006.3 Quantication tool(s)utilized:Diesel Emission Quantier,eGRID,Oregon Clean Fuels 3.Implementing agency or agencies As envisioned,UDAQ would be the lead agency and would sub-contract/partner with municipalities and eet operators,although other eligible entities in Utah could apply for and administer this or a similar program. 4.Review of authority to implement Under Utah Code 19-1-201,the department [UDEQ]may perform the administrative functions of the boards established by Section 19-1-106,including the acceptance and administration of grants from the federal government and from other sources,public or private,to carry out the board's functions.Also under Utah Code 19-1-202,the [UDEQ] executive director may,with the approval of the governor,participate in the distribution, disbursement,or administration of any fund or service,advanced,offered,or contributed by the federal government for purposes consistent with the powers and duties of the department. Utah Code 19-1-105,creates the Utah Division of Air Quality to administer 19-2,Air Conservation Act.Under Utah Code 19-2-107,the [UDAQ]director may accept,receive,and administer grants or other funds or gifts from public and private agencies,including the federal government,for the purpose of carrying out any of the functions of the Air Conservation Act.Furthermore,UDAQ is eligible to apply for assistance under this solicitation,in accordance with 42 U.S.C.16131 and CFDA 66.039. Under this authority,UDAQ has administered clean vehicle and equipment incentive programs for over two decades. 5.Implementation schedule and milestones Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Program development 6 units Program assessment Program closed Program closed 6.Geographic location Statewide implementation. 7.Funding sources a.Funding needed to implement:$1,725,000 b.Complementary Funding: ●IIJA 40552 -Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG)Program ●IRA 60101 -Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicle Program BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 23 of 83 DRAFT●IIJA 21202 -Local and Regional Project Assistance Grants (RAISE) ●IRA 13403 -Commercial Clean Vehicle Tax Credit (45W ) ●IRA 60103 -Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund -Clean Communities Investment Accelerator ●IRA 60201 -Environmental and Climate Justice Block Grants -Change Grants ●IIJA 40109 -State Energy Program ●IIJA 40401 -Department of Energy Loan Programs ●IIJA Division J Title VIII -Port Infrastructure Development Program Grants ●IRA 60104 -EPA Diesel Emissions Reduction Act (DERA)funding ●EPA Targeted Airshed Grants c.Funding pursued by state or secured for implementation of this project: ●IRA 60104 -EPA Diesel Emissions Reduction Act (DERA)funding ●EPA Targeted Airshed Grants ●Alternative Fuel Heavy-Duty Vehicle Tax Credit d.How additional implementation grant dollars are necessary to fund the measure: ●This would be a new state program but would complement or replenish funding for the state’s existing Heavy-Duty tax credit,Clean Fuels and Emission Reduction Technology Program (CFERT),and CARROT Program. 8.Metrics for tracking progress For this measure,we use the following metrics to track progress:number of electric Class 8 refuse haulers deployed,vehicle life,and number of performance years for implementation in order to quantify emissions reductions. 9.Quantitative cost estimates UDAQ assumed total deployment of six units at an incentive level of $250,000/unit,for a total incentive budget of $1,500,000,to which 15%in administrative expenses were added, for a total project budget of $1,725,000.Future implementation grant proposals from eligible entities,including UDAQ,may vary depending on selected project parameters. 10.LIDAC Benets/Analysis Many parts of Utah include disadvantaged areas according to the IRA Disadvantaged Communities map.This heavy-duty electric vehicle incentive program could prioritize funding in LIDAC areas of Utah,which are often also non-attainment areas. In addition to the general LIDAC benets associated with measures (see the LIDAC Analysis section of this Priority Plan)potential benets unique to this measure include: ●Reduced level of NOx,shown in this project’s Section 2 table; ●Lower cost of maintenance and cost of charging,compared to an ICE vehicle’s maintenance and cost of gasoline,for eets; ●Reduced noise pollution. BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 24 of 83 DRAFTFordetailedinformationaboutUDAQLIDACengagement,see the Outreach and Coordination section of this Priority Plan. Project #3 -Electric School Bus Ready Program 1.Project Description Use CPRG funds to create a proposed voluntary School Bus Ready Program.This program would not fund school buses,but would instead provide gap funding for complementary items like electrical/utility work,site preparation,and other supporting costs that may not be directly eligible for other funding sources (e.g.,EPA’s Clean School Bus Program,DERA , and TAG).This program would help school districts across the state,enabling more schools to acquire electric school buses. 2.Estimate of GHG and criteria pollutant emissions reductions UDAQ estimated GHG and criteria pollutant emission reductions based on assumptions made for an example program that would incentivize and deploy 60 units.Actual emissions reductions will vary depending on selected program parameters. GHG and Criteria Emissions Reductions (metric tons) NOx SO2 PM2.5 VOCs NH3 CO2e By 2030 2.7 -0.1 -0.001 0.2 0.2 701.1 By 2050 15.2 -0.5 -0.005 1.3 1.0 4,006.1 Quantication tool(s)utilized:AVERT,Uinta Basin School Bus Program 3.Implementing agency or agencies As envisioned,UDAQ would be the lead agency and would sub-contract/partner with school districts,although other eligible entities in Utah could apply for and administer this or a similar program. 4.Review of authority to implement Under Utah Code 19-1-201,the department [UDEQ]may perform the administrative functions of the boards established by Section 19-1-106,including the acceptance and administration of grants from the federal government and from other sources,public or private,to carry out the board's functions.Also under Utah Code 19-1-202,the [UDEQ] executive director may,with the approval of the governor,participate in the distribution, disbursement,or administration of any fund or service,advanced,offered,or contributed by the federal government for purposes consistent with the powers and duties of the department. Utah Code 19-1-105,creates the Utah Division of Air Quality to administer 19-2,Air Conservation Act.Under Utah Code 19-2-107,the [UDAQ]director may accept,receive,and administer grants or other funds or gifts from public and private agencies,including the BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 25 of 83 DRAFTfederalgovernment,for the purpose of carrying out any of the functions of the Air Conservation Act.Furthermore,UDAQ is eligible to apply for assistance under this solicitation,in accordance with 42 U.S.C.16131 and CFDA 66.039. Under this authority,UDAQ has administered clean vehicle and equipment incentive programs for over two decades. 5.Implementation schedule and milestones Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Program development 15 15 15 15 6.Geographic location Statewide implementation. 7.Funding sources a.Funding needed to implement:$4,140,000 a.Complementary Funding: ●IIJA 40552-Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) Program ●IIJA 40431 -Consideration of Measures to Promote Greater Electrication of the Transportation Sector ●IRA 40541 -Grants for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Improvements at Public Schools (Renew America's Schools) ●IRA 60103 -Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund -Clean Communities Investment Accelerator ●IRA 60201 -Environmental and Climate Justice Block Grants -Change Grants ●IIJA 40109 -State Energy Program ●IIJA 40401 -Department of Energy Loan Programs ●IIJA 71101 -Clean School Bus Program ●Diesel Emission Reduction Act (DERA) ●EPA Targeted Airshed Grants (TAG) b.Funding pursued by state or secured for implementation of this project: ●IIJA 71101 -Clean School Bus Program c.How additional implementation grant dollars are necessary to fund the measure: ●Schools don't have the budget to purchase EV and infrastructure ●EPA Clean School Bus program,DERA,and TAG do not account for some infrastructure requirements (e.g.,front-of-meter expenses). ●Requirements for eligibility/criteria of other programs make it difficult for some districts to apply (e.g.,EPA Clean School Bus minimum school bus requirement). BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 26 of 83 DRAFT8.Metrics for tracking progress For this measure,we use the following metrics to track progress:number of school buses deployed,school bus life,and number of performance years for implementation in order to quantify emissions reductions. 9.Quantitative cost estimates UDAQ assumed total deployment of 60 units at an incentive level of $60,000/unit,for a total incentive budget of $3,600,000,to which 15%in administrative expenses were added, for a total project budget of $4,140,000.Future implementation grant proposals from eligible entities,including UDAQ,may vary depending on selected project parameters. 10.LIDAC Benets/Analysis Many parts of Utah include disadvantaged areas according to the IRA Disadvantaged Communities map.UDAQ could prioritize funding for school districts in the state’s LIDAC areas that do not yet have an electric school bus. In addition to the general LIDAC benets associated with measures (see the LIDAC Analysis section of this Priority Plan)potential benets unique to this measure include: ●Reduced level of NOx,VOCs,NH3 shown in this project’s Section 2 table; ●Lower cost of maintenance and cost of charging,compared to maintenance and cost of fuel for diesel/gasoline school buses; ●Reduced noise pollution. For detailed information about UDAQ LIDAC engagement,see the Outreach and Coordination section of this Priority Plan. Project #4 -Electric School Bus Pilot Program 1.Project Description Use CPRG funds to create a new Electric School Bus (ESB)program,which would be a new, voluntary pilot program for school districts across the state. While a few school districts in Utah have accessed federal funding for electric school buses,the majority have experienced barriers in accessing funding for this new technology.UDAQ would be the lead agency and would sub-contract/partner with school districts to administer the program.There would be no minimum unit requirement and no scrappage requirement. Various ESB measures could be implemented by multiple states in a coalition.For instance, a technical assistance center and a workforce development program could be scaled up and made regional rather than state-specic.Many of the measures could be bid out to a third-party administrator (or at least major portions of work).For instance,a technical BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 27 of 83 DRAFTassistancecenterorworkforcedevelopmentprogramcouldbealmostentirely implemented by a third-party administrator via contractors. 2.Estimate of GHG and criteria pollutant emissions reductions UDAQ estimated GHG and criteria pollutant emission reductions based on assumptions made for an example program that would incentivize and deploy 40 electric school buses. Actual emissions reductions will vary depending on selected program parameters. GHG and Criteria Emissions Reductions (metric tons) NOx SO2 PM2.5 VOCs NH3 CO2e By 2030 1.8 -0.1 -0.001 0.1 0.1 467.4 By 2050 10.1 -0.3 -0.004 0.8 0.7 2,670.8 Quantication tool(s)utilized:AVERT 3.Implementing agency or agencies As envisioned,UDAQ would be the lead agency and would sub-contract/partner with school districts,although other eligible entities in Utah could apply for and administer this or a similar program. 4.Review of authority to implement Under Utah Code 19-1-201,the department [UDEQ]may perform the administrative functions of the boards established by Section 19-1-106,including the acceptance and administration of grants from the federal government and from other sources,public or private,to carry out the board's functions.Also under Utah Code 19-1-202,the [UDEQ] executive director may,with the approval of the governor,participate in the distribution, disbursement,or administration of any fund or service,advanced,offered,or contributed by the federal government for purposes consistent with the powers and duties of the department. Utah Code 19-1-105,creates the Utah Division of Air Quality to administer 19-2,Air Conservation Act.Under Utah Code 19-2-107,the [UDAQ]director may accept,receive,and administer grants or other funds or gifts from public and private agencies,including the federal government,for the purpose of carrying out any of the functions of the Air Conservation Act.Furthermore,UDAQ is eligible to apply for assistance under this solicitation,in accordance with 42 U.S.C.16131 and CFDA 66.039. Under this authority,UDAQ has administered clean vehicle and equipment incentive programs for over two decades. 5.Implementation schedule and milestones Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 28 of 83 DRAFTProgramdevelopment10units10units10units10units 6.Geographic location Statewide implementation. 7.Funding sources a.Funding needed to implement:$15,870,000 b.Complementary Funding: ●IIJA 40552 -Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) Program ●IIJA 40431 -Consideration of Measures to Promote Greater Electrication of the Transportation Sector ●IRA 40541 -Grants for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Improvements at Public Schools (Renew America's Schools) ●IRA 60101 -Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicle Program ●IRA 60103 -Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund -Clean Communities Investment Accelerator ●IIJA 40109 -State Energy Program ●IRA 60104 -EPA Diesel Emissions Reduction Act (DERA)funding ●EPA Targeted Airshed Grants ●The EPA’s Clean School Bus (CSB)program c.Funding pursued by state or secured for implementation of this project: ●IRA 60104 -EPA Diesel Emissions Reduction Act (DERA)funding ●EPA Targeted Airshed Grants ●The EPA’s Clean School Bus (CSB)program d.How additional implementation grant dollars are necessary to fund the measure: ●UDAQhas been told that the application process and requirements of this program often make it difficult for other Utah school districts to access.Requirements for eligibility/criteria of other programs (EPA Clean School Bus)make it difficult for some districts to apply. ●The logistical challenge with adopting new technology (ie electric school buses)often is a hurdle in itself. ●Increase adoption among the School Districts that do not yet have one. ●DERA program scrappage requirements. ●Schools don't have the budget to purchase EV and infrastructure ●EPA clean school bus,DERA,and TAG don't account for utilities 8.Metrics for tracking progress For this measure,we use the following metrics to track progress:number of electric school buses deployed,vehicle life,and number of performance years for implementation in order to quantify emissions reductions. BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 29 of 83 DRAFT9.Quantitative cost estimates UDAQ assumed total deployment of 40 units at an incentive level of $345,000/unit (approximate incremental cost),for a total incentive budget of $13,800,000,to which 15% in administrative expenses were added,for a total project budget of $15,870,000.Future implementation grant proposals from eligible entities,including UDAQ,may vary depending on selected project parameters. 10.LIDAC Benets/Analysis Many parts of Utah include disadvantaged areas according to the IRA Disadvantaged Communities map.UDAQ could prioritize,but not limit,funding for school districts in the state’s LIDAC areas that do not yet have an electric school bus. In addition to the general LIDAC benets associated with measures (see the LIDAC Analysis section of this Priority Plan)potential benets unique to this measure include: ●Reduced level of NOx,VOCs,NH3 shown in this project’s Section 2 table; ●Lower cost of maintenance and cost of charging,compared to maintenance and cost of fuel for diesel/gasoline school buses; ●Reduced noise pollution. For detailed information about UDAQ LIDAC engagement,see the Outreach and Coordination section of this Priority Plan. BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 30 of 83 DRAFTMeasure#3 -Light-Duty Zero-Emission Vehicle Charging/Refueling Incentives This measure intends to voluntarily increase adoption/use of light-duty zero-emission vehicles in Utah through enabling more vehicle charging /refueling.Potential nancial incentives could include ongoing grants and technical assistance navigating incentives. Below are specic examples of types of projects for this measure. Project #1:Electric Fleet Chargers 1.Project Description Use CPRG funds to create a proposed Electric Fleet Charger incentive program for the full cost of Level 2 chargers for government and commercial eets.Potential nancial incentives could include ongoing grants and technical assistance navigating incentives. UDAQ would be the lead agency and would sub-contract/partner with municipalities and other public/government entities in the state. 2.Estimate of GHG and criteria pollutant emissions reductions UDAQ estimated GHG and criteria pollutant emission reductions based on assumptions made for an example program that would incentivize and deploy 400 EV chargers.Actual emissions reductions will vary depending on selected program parameters. GHG and Criteria Emissions Reductions (metric tons) NOx SO2 PM2.5 VOCs NH3 CO2e By 2030 1.4 -0.7 0.0 4.0 4,000.5 By 2050 4.0 -2.0 0.1 11.4 11,429.9 Quantication tool(s)utilized:BTS MOVES emission factors,eGRID,SLC eet charger data 3.Implementing agency or agencies As envisioned,UDAQ would be the lead agency and would sub-contract/partner with municipalities and other public/government entities in the state,although other eligible entities in Utah could apply for and administer this a or a similar program. 4.Review of authority to implement Under Utah Code 19-1-201,the department [UDEQ]may perform the administrative functions of the boards established by Section 19-1-106,including the acceptance and administration of grants from the federal government and from other sources,public or private,to carry out the board's functions.Also under Utah Code 19-1-202,the [UDEQ] executive director may,with the approval of the governor,participate in the distribution, disbursement,or administration of any fund or service,advanced,offered,or contributed BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 31 of 83 DRAFTbythefederalgovernmentforpurposesconsistentwiththepowersanddutiesofthe department. Utah Code 19-1-105,creates the Utah Division of Air Quality to administer 19-2,Air Conservation Act.Under Utah Code 19-2-107,the [UDAQ]director may accept,receive,and administer grants or other funds or gifts from public and private agencies,including the federal government,for the purpose of carrying out any of the functions of the Air Conservation Act.Furthermore,UDAQ is eligible to apply for assistance under this solicitation,in accordance with 42 U.S.C.16131 and CFDA 66.039. 5.Implementation schedule and milestones Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Program development 100 units 100 units 100 units 100 units 6.Geographic location Statewide implementation. 7.Funding sources a.Funding needed to implement:$3,220,000 b.Complementary Funding: ●IRA 13404 -Alternative Fuel Refueling Property Credit (30C) ●IIJA 11129 -Grants for Charging and Fueling Infrastructure ●IRA 60101 -Clean Heavy Duty Vehicles ●IIJA 11401 -Charging and Fueling Infrastructure Grants (Community Charging /Corridor Charging) ●IIJA 40431 -Consideration of Measures to Promote Greater Electrication of the Transportation Sector ●IIJA Division J -Title VIII -NEVI Program ●IIJA 40103 -Program Upgrading Our Electric Grid and Ensuring Reliability and Resiliency ●IIJA 40552 -Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG)Program c.Funding pursued by state or secured for implementation of this project: ●IIJA Division J -Title VIII -NEVI Program ●Utah’s Workplace Electric Vehicle Charging Funding Assistance (EVSE) Program d.How additional implementation grant dollars are necessary to fund the measure: ●Leading by example ●Would these be available for public use too when not gov hours? ●No existing funding for this currently? 8.Metrics for tracking progress BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 32 of 83 DRAFTForthismeasure,we use the following metrics to track progress:number of government and/or commercial EV Chargers deployed,EV charger life,and number of performance years for implementation in order to quantify emissions reductions. 9.Quantitative cost estimates UDAQ assumed total deployment of 400 units at an incentive level of $7,000/unit,for a total incentive budget of $2,800,000,to which 15%in administrative expenses were added, for a total project budget of $3,220,000.Future implementation grant proposals from eligible entities,including UDAQ,may vary depending on selected project parameters. 10.LIDAC Benets/Analysis A new EV charger incentive program would be available to government and commercial eets within Utah,including eets of municipalities.Many municipalities in Utah include disadvantaged areas according to the IRA Disadvantaged Communities map. In addition to the general LIDAC benets associated with measures (see the LIDAC Analysis section of this Priority Plan)potential benets unique to this measure (enabling greater use of EVs)include: ●Reduced level of NOx and VOCs,shown in this project’s Section 2 table; ●Lower cost of maintenance and cost of charging,compared to an ICE vehicle’s maintenance and cost of gasoline,for government eets; ●Reduced noise pollution. For detailed information about UDAQ LIDAC engagement,see the Outreach and Coordination section of this Priority Plan. Project #2 -Charging Alternatives (Workplace and Multi-Family Dwelling Electric Vehicle Chargers) 1.Project Description Use CPRG funds for the full cost of Level 2 chargers at multi-family dwellings and workplaces throughout the state.Potential nancial incentives could include one-time grants and technical assistance navigating incentives. This new program would build upon/scale up the success of Utah’s existing Workplace Electric Vehicle Charging Funding Assistance (EVSE)Program and Rocky Mountain Power’s EV Make-Ready Program.Funding for EVSE was expended in 2023.UDAQ would be the lead agency and would sub-contract/partner with municipalities,other public/government entities,and NGOs in the state. 2.Estimate of GHG and criteria pollutant emissions reductions UDAQ estimated GHG and criteria pollutant emission reductions based on assumptions made for an example program that would incentivize and deploy 400 EV chargers.Actual emissions reductions will vary depending on selected program parameters. BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 33 of 83 DRAFTGHGandCriteriaEmissionsReductions(metric tons) NOx SO2 PM2.5 VOCs NH3 CO2e By 2030 2.9 -1.5 0.1 8.5 8,504.8 By 2050 8.3 -4.4 0.2 24.3 24,299.5 Quantication tool(s)utilized:BTS MOVES emission factors,eGRID,SLC public charger data 3.Implementing agency or agencies As envisioned,UDAQ would be the lead agency and would sub-contract/partner with UCAIR,municipalities and/or relevant stakeholders like housing providers and multi-family building developers in the state,although other eligible entities in Utah could apply for and administer this a or a similar program. 4.Review of authority to implement Under Utah Code 19-1-201,the department [UDEQ]may perform the administrative functions of the boards established by Section 19-1-106,including the acceptance and administration of grants from the federal government and from other sources,public or private,to carry out the board's functions.Also under Utah Code 19-1-202,the [UDEQ] executive director may,with the approval of the governor,participate in the distribution, disbursement,or administration of any fund or service,advanced,offered,or contributed by the federal government for purposes consistent with the powers and duties of the department. Utah Code 19-1-105,creates the Utah Division of Air Quality to administer 19-2,Air Conservation Act.Under Utah Code 19-2-107,the [UDAQ]director may accept,receive,and administer grants or other funds or gifts from public and private agencies,including the federal government,for the purpose of carrying out any of the functions of the Air Conservation Act.Furthermore,UDAQ is eligible to apply for assistance under this solicitation,in accordance with 42 U.S.C.16131 and CFDA 66.039. 5.Implementation schedule and milestones Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Program development 100 units 100 units 100 units 100 units 6.Geographic location Statewide implementation. 7.Funding sources a.Funding needed to implement:$3,220,000 b.Complementary Funding: ●IRA 13404 -Alternative fuel refueling property credit (30C) BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 34 of 83 DRAFT●IIJA 11129 -Grants for Charging and Fueling Infrastructure ●IRA 60101 -Clean Heavy Duty Vehicles ●IIJA 11401 -Charging and Fueling Infrastructure Grants (Community Charging /Corridor Charging) ●IIJA 40431 -Consideration of Measures to Promote Greater Electrication of the Transportation Sector ●IIJA Division J -Title VIII -NEVI Program ●IIJA 40552 -Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG)Program ●Rocky Mountain Power ’s EV Make-Ready Program c.Funding pursued by state or secured for implementation of this project: ●IIJA Division J -Title VIII -NEVI Program ●Utah Workplace Electric Vehicle Charging Funding Assistance (EVSE)Program ●Rocky Mountain Power ’s EV Make-Ready Program d.How additional implementation grant dollars are necessary to fund the measure: ●Need for greater charging network to incentive people to buy EV ●Utah Workplace Electric Vehicle Charging Funding Assistance Program has been depleted ●The U.S.Department of Energy reports that more than 80 percent of electric vehicle (EV)charging occurs at home.Approximately 30 percent of U.S. households are multi-family dwellings (MFDs)such as apartments and condos and almost 75 percent of MFD households have at least one vehicle.For the EV market to reach the entire driving population,EV charging must be made available to MFD residents. ●The US Department of Energy reports that around 80%of EV charging happens at home.Unfortunately,that means that renters and those who don’t live in single-family homes are unlikely to be able to charge at home,presenting a signicant barrier to EV adoption. 8.Metrics for tracking progress For this measure,we use the following metrics to track progress:number of EV chargers deployed,EV charger life,and number of performance years for implementation in order to quantify emissions reductions. 9.Quantitative cost estimates UDAQ assumed total deployment of 400 units at an incentive level of $7,000/unit,for a total incentive budget of $2,800,000,to which 15%in administrative expenses were added, for a total project budget of $3,220,000.Future implementation grant proposals from eligible entities,including UDAQ,may vary depending on selected project parameters. 10.LIDAC Benets/Analysis According to the U.S.Department of Energy,low-income households (earning 80%or less of the area median income)reside in approximately 60%of MFD housing units.A new EV BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 35 of 83 DRAFTchargerincentiveprogramwouldbeforMFDslocatedinUtah.Many parts in Utah include disadvantaged areas according to the IRA Disadvantaged Communities map. In addition to the general LIDAC benets associated with measures (see the LIDAC Analysis section of this Priority Plan)potential benets unique to this measure (enabling greater use of EVs)include: ●Reduced level of NOx and VOCs,shown in this project’s Section 2 table; ●Greater access to EV charging for residents of MFDs; ●Lower cost of maintenance and cost of charging,compared to an ICE vehicle’s maintenance and cost of gasoline,for residents of MFDs; ●Reduced noise pollution. A potential unique disbenet (identied by LIDAC stakeholders)is lack of interest/need for EV chargers since many LIDAC members/MFD residents do not currently own EVs;this can be mitigated through incentive programs to increase ownership of EVs among LIDAC members/MFD residents.For detailed information about UDAQ LIDAC engagement,see the Outreach and Coordination section of this Priority Plan. BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 36 of 83 DRAFTMeasure#4:Mode-Shifting/Reducing Vehicle Miles Traveled This measure intends to voluntarily increase mode-shifting and reduce vehicle miles traveled (i.e.,individuals adopting modes of transportation other than personal vehicles)in Utah.Mode shifting /reduction of VMT can be achieved through actions like transportation demand management programs,programs that support/incentivize active transportation (such as biking,walking,and public transit),and,more holistically,by ensuring that land use and transportation planning are considered together.Potential nancial incentives could include ongoing grants and technical assistance navigating incentives.Below are specic examples of types of projects for this measure. Project #1 -E-Bike Incentive 1.Project Description Use CPRG funds to create an additional cost incentive for e-bikes for individuals in Utah, including those in LIDAC households.Potential nancial incentives could include ongoing grants and outreach and technical assistance navigating incentives. This project could scale up an existing statewide e-bike incentive program,in order to increase adoption of e-bikes among individuals in Utah.Several states currently or have previously implemented this type of program,including Colorado.A research study for the Bureau of Transportation Statistics focused on the number of daily trips taken in the United States.In 2021,52%of all trips,including all modes of transportation,were less than three miles,with 28%of trips less than one mile.E-bikes can provide an accessible alternative mode of transportation for short daily trips (those less than 3 miles). 2.Estimate of GHG and criteria pollutant emissions reductions UDAQ estimated GHG and criteria pollutant emission reductions based on assumptions made for an example program that would incentivize and deploy 1000 E-bikes.Actual emissions reductions will vary depending on selected program parameters. GHG and Criteria Emissions Reductions (metric tons) NOx SO2 PM2.5 VOCs NH3 CO2e By 2030 0.6 -0.0 0.0 0.9 1,188.0 By 2050 1.4 -0.1 0.0 2.3 2,969.9 Quantication tool(s)utilized:BTS MOVES emission factors,eGRID,DEQ assumptions 3.Implementing agency or agencies UDAQ would be the lead agency and could sub-contract/partner with Utah Clean Air Partnership (UCAIR)to administer the program. BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 37 of 83 DRAFT4.Review of authority to implement Under Utah Code 19-1-201,the department [UDEQ]may perform the administrative functions of the boards established by Section 19-1-106,including the acceptance and administration of grants from the federal government and from other sources,public or private,to carry out the board's functions.Also under Utah Code 19-1-202,the [UDEQ] executive director may,with the approval of the governor,participate in the distribution, disbursement,or administration of any fund or service,advanced,offered,or contributed by the federal government for purposes consistent with the powers and duties of the department. Utah Code 19-1-105,creates the Utah Division of Air Quality to administer 19-2,Air Conservation Act.Under Utah Code 19-2-107,the [UDAQ]director may accept,receive,and administer grants or other funds or gifts from public and private agencies,including the federal government,for the purpose of carrying out any of the functions of the Air Conservation Act.Furthermore,UDAQ is eligible to apply for assistance under this solicitation,in accordance with 42 U.S.C.16131 and CFDA 66.039. 5.Implementation schedule and milestones Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 200 units 200 units 200 units 200 units 200 units 6.Geographic location Statewide implementation. 7.Funding sources a.Funding needed to implement:$690,000 b.Complementary Funding: ●There is currently no federal or State of Utah funding allocated for e-bike incentives. c.Funding pursued by state or secured for implementation of this project: ●There is currently no federal or State of Utah funding allocated for e-bike incentives. d.How additional implementation grant dollars are necessary to fund the measure: ●Need for state-specic program ●More cost-effective than EV for many individuals/families 8.Metrics for tracking progress For this measure,we use the following metrics to track progress:number of e-bikes deployed,e-bike life,and number of performance years for implementation in order to quantify emissions reductions. BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 38 of 83 DRAFT9.Quantitative cost estimates UDAQ assumed total deployment of 1,000 units at an incentive level of $600/unit,for a total incentive budget of $600,000,to which 15%in administrative expenses were added, for a total project budget of $690,000.Future implementation grant proposals from eligible entities,including UDAQ,may vary depending on selected project parameters. 10.LIDAC Benets/Analysis A new e-bike incentive program could be open to all residents of Utah,and funding could be prioritized for low-income residents/LIDAC areas.Many parts of Utah include disadvantaged areas according to the IRA Disadvantaged Communities map.As a program with an income-qualied component,this incentive intends to target the population that is typically less nancially able to purchase e-bikes. In addition to the general LIDAC benets associated with measures (see the LIDAC Analysis section of this Priority Plan)potential benets unique to this measure include: ●Reduced level of NOx and VOCs,shown in this project’s Section 2 table; ●Increased access to transportation alternatives/options for Utah residents and LIDAC individuals; ●Lower up-front cost and lower cost of maintenance (compared to a vehicle’s up-front cost and cost of maintenance),for LIDAC individuals; ●Increased physical activity/health benets; ●Reduced traffic; ●Reduced noise pollution. Potential unique disbenets include the initial cost of an e-bike and lack of carrying capacity compared to a car.This program intends to mitigate the cost concerns,by providing an additional nancial incentive for e-bikes;also,there could be a greater incentive amount for cargo e-bikes with larger carrying capacity.For detailed information about UDAQ LIDAC engagement,see the Coordination and Outreach section of this Priority Plan. Project #2 -Trail Development for Active Transportation 1.Project Description Use CPRG funds to fund trail development for increased use of active transportation (like walking and biking).This project would support ongoing efforts related to the Utah Trail Network.This is a vision of a network of paved trails throughout the state that connects Utahns of all ages and abilities to their destinations and communities.Specically,CPRG funding would be utilized to develop one trail project along SR-9 and US-89 in Kane County and another along SR-7 in Washington County. 2.Estimate of GHG and criteria pollutant emissions reductions BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 39 of 83 DRAFTUDAQestimatedGHGandcriteriapollutantemissionreductionsbasedonassumptionsmade for an example program that would complete two trail projects in Kane and Washington counties.Actual emissions reductions will vary depending on selected program parameters. GHG and Criteria Emissions Reductions (metric tons) NOx SO2 PM2.5 VOCs NH3 CO2e By 2030 0.5 0.0 0.7 940.9 By 2050 5.0 0.1 7.8 10,349.4 Quantication tool(s)utilized:BTS MOVES emission factors,UDOT assumptions 3.Implementing agency or agencies UDOT would implement this measure. 4.Review of authority to implement UDOT is a State entity established by Utah Code 17-1-2 which has “the general responsibility for planning,research,design,construction,maintenance,security,and safety of state transportation systems”in the state of Utah.UDOT routinely receives federal funding for transportation investments,including trail development. 5.Implementation schedule and milestones Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Trails to be completed before the end of the performance period. 6.Geographic location Kane County and Washington County. 7.Funding sources a.Funding needed to implement: b.Complementary Funding: c.Funding pursued by state or secured for implementation of this project: ●More information needed. d.How additional implementation grant dollars are necessary to fund the measure: ●More information needed. 8.Metrics for tracking progress For this measure,we use the following metrics to track progress:completion of trails projects on a timely basis,measurement of trail use via surveys,tracking services,and related metrics. 9.Quantitative cost estimates BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 40 of 83 DRAFTBasedonassumptionsmadeforanexampleprogramthatwouldincentivizetwotrail projects.UDAQ estimates total project costs of $40,000,000.Future implementation grant proposals from eligible entities may vary depending on selected project parameters. 10.LIDAC Benets/Analysis Public trails would be open to all residents of Utah,and funding could be prioritized for LIDAC areas.Many parts of Utah include disadvantaged areas according to the IRA Disadvantaged Communities map. In addition to the general LIDAC benets associated with measures (see the LIDAC Analysis section of this Priority Plan)potential benets unique to this measure include: ●Reduced level of NOx,PM2.5,VOCs,shown in this project’s Section 2 table; ●Increased access to transportation alternatives/options for Utah residents and LIDAC individuals; ●Reduced traffic; ●Reduced noise pollution. For detailed information about UDAQ LIDAC engagement,see the Coordination and Outreach section of this Priority Plan. BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 41 of 83 DRAFTMeasure#5:Zero-Emission Non-Road Incentives This measure intends to voluntarily increase adoption of zero-emission nonroad equipment and locomotives in Utah.Potential formats of the program include vouchers, grants,and technical assistance navigating incentives.Below are specic examples of types of projects for this measure. Project #1 -Electric Non-Road Equipment 1.Project Description: Use CPRG funds to create a proposed zero-emission nonroad program for nonroad equipment incentives for government and commercial eets.Potential formats of the program include vouchers,grants,and technical assistance navigating incentives. This project was identied by one or more stakeholders and/or UDAQ staff.UDAQ is seeking feedback on program design and quantication of costs,emission reductions,and other program parameters. 2.Estimate of GHG and criteria pollutant emissions reductions More information needed. 3.Implementing agency or agencies As envisioned,UDAQ would be the lead agency and would sub-contract/partner with municipalities and other public/government entities in the state. 4.Review of authority to implement Under Utah Code 19-1-201,the department [UDEQ]may perform the administrative functions of the boards established by Section 19-1-106,including the acceptance and administration of grants from the federal government and from other sources,public or private,to carry out the board's functions.Also under Utah Code 19-1-202,the [UDEQ] executive director may,with the approval of the governor,participate in the distribution, disbursement,or administration of any fund or service,advanced,offered,or contributed by the federal government for purposes consistent with the powers and duties of the department. Utah Code 19-1-105,creates the Utah Division of Air Quality to administer 19-2,Air Conservation Act.Under Utah Code 19-2-107,the [UDAQ]director may accept,receive,and administer grants or other funds or gifts from public and private agencies,including the federal government,for the purpose of carrying out any of the functions of the Air Conservation Act.Furthermore,UDAQ is eligible to apply for assistance under this solicitation,in accordance with 42 U.S.C.16131 and CFDA 66.039. BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 42 of 83 DRAFT5.Implementation schedule and milestones More information needed. 6.Geographic location Statewide implementation. 7.Funding sources a.Funding needed to implement:More information needed. b.Complementary Funding: ●IIJA 40552 -Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) Program ●IRA 60101 -Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicle Program ●IIJA 21202 -Local and Regional Project Assistance Grants (RAISE) ●IRA 13403 -Commercial Clean Vehicle Tax Credit (45W ) ●IRA 22002 -Rural Energy for America Program (REAP) ●IRA 60101 -Grants to Reduce Air Pollution at Ports ●IRA -Clean Ports Program ●IIJA Division J Title VII -Port Infrastructure Development Program Grants ●IRA 60103 -Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund -Clean Communities Investment Accelerator ●IRA 60201 -Environmental and Climate Justice Block Grants -Change Grants ●IIJA 40109 -State Energy Program ●IIJA 40401 -Department of Energy Loan Programs ●IIJA Division J Title VIII -Port Infrastructure Development Program Grants ●IRA 60104 -EPA Diesel Emissions Reduction Act (DERA)funding c.Funding pursued by state or secured for implementation of this project: ●IRA 60104 -EPA Diesel Emissions Reduction Act (DERA)funding d.How additional implementation grant dollars are necessary to fund the measure: ●This would be a new state program but would complement the state’s existing DERA grant. ●Scrappage requirements in DERA make the existing funds less enticing. ●Eligibility requirements in DERA have been a stopping point for some interested parties. 8.Metrics for tracking progress More information needed. 9.Quantitative cost estimates More information needed. BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 43 of 83 DRAFT10.LIDAC Benets/Analysis More information needed. Project #2 -Electric Locomotives 1.Project Description: Use CPRG funds to create a proposed zero-emission switcher locomotive pilot grant program for smaller rail operators to explore zero-emission switcher locomotives that operate outside of the Utah Inland Port Authority (UIPA)jurisdiction. This project was identied by one or more stakeholders and/or UDAQ staff.UDAQ is seeking feedback on program design and quantication of costs,emission reductions,and other program parameters. 2.Estimate of GHG and criteria pollutant emissions reductions More information needed. 3.Implementing agency or agencies As envisioned,UDAQ would be the lead agency and would sub-contract/partner with other entities in the state. 4.Review of authority to implement Under Utah Code 19-1-201,the department [UDEQ]may perform the administrative functions of the boards established by Section 19-1-106,including the acceptance and administration of grants from the federal government and from other sources,public or private,to carry out the board's functions.Also under Utah Code 19-1-202,the [UDEQ] executive director may,with the approval of the governor,participate in the distribution, disbursement,or administration of any fund or service,advanced,offered,or contributed by the federal government for purposes consistent with the powers and duties of the department. Utah Code 19-1-105,creates the Utah Division of Air Quality to administer 19-2,Air Conservation Act.Under Utah Code 19-2-107,the [UDAQ]director may accept,receive,and administer grants or other funds or gifts from public and private agencies,including the federal government,for the purpose of carrying out any of the functions of the Air Conservation Act.Furthermore,UDAQ is eligible to apply for assistance under this solicitation,in accordance with 42 U.S.C.16131 and CFDA 66.039. 5.Implementation schedule and milestones More information needed. 6.Geographic location BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 44 of 83 DRAFTStatewideimplementation. 7.Funding sources a.Funding needed to implement:More information needed. b.Complementary Funding: ●IRA 22002 -Rural Energy for America Program (REAP) ●IRA 60101 -Grants to Reduce Air Pollution at Ports ●IRA -Clean Ports Program ●IIJA Division J Title VII -Port Infrastructure Development Program Grants ●IIJA 21201 -National Infrastructure Project Assistance ●IIJA 40552 -Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) Program ●IRA 60101 -Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicle Program ●IIJA 21202 -Local and Regional Project Assistance Grants (RAISE) ●IRA 13403 -Commercial Clean Vehicle Tax Credit (45W ) ●IRA 60103 -Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund -Clean Communities Investment Accelerator ●IRA 60201 -Environmental and Climate Justice Block Grants -Change Grants ●IRA 22103 -Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvement Grants (CRISI) ●IIJA -Rail Vehicle Replacement Grants ●IIJA -National Highway Freight Program (NHFP)through the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST)Act ●IIJA -Transportation Infrastructure Finance &Assistance (TIFIA) ●Railroad Rehabilitation Improvement Finance (RRIF) ●Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG)Program (previously the Surface Transportation Program) ●Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ)Improvement Program through Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST)Act ●IIJA 40109 -State Energy Program ●IIJA 40401 -Department of Energy Loan Programs ●IIJA Division J Title VIII -Port Infrastructure Development Program Grants ●IRA 60104 -EPA Diesel Emissions Reduction Act (DERA)funding ●EPA Targeted Airshed Grants c.Funding pursued by state or secured for implementation of this project: ●IRA 60104 -EPA Diesel Emissions Reduction Act (DERA)funding ●EPA Targeted Airshed Grants d.How additional implementation grant dollars are necessary to fund the measure: BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 45 of 83 DRAFT●This is too expensive of a commitment for people to make without a large incentive. ●It is often too large of a project for our existing funds (Targeted Airshed and DERA)and the scrappage requirement is not likely to work for participants. 8.Metrics for tracking progress More information needed. 9.Quantitative cost estimates More information needed. 10.LIDAC Benets/Analysis More information needed. BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 46 of 83 DRAFTBuildings Measure #6:Energy Eiciency and Zero-Emission Technology This measure intends to voluntarily increase efforts related to building energy efficiency and zero-emission technology in Utah.Potential nancial incentives could include point of sale rebates,ongoing grants,and technical assistance navigating incentives.Below are specic examples of types of projects for this measure. Project #1 -Whole Home Retrofits Program 1.Project Description: Use CPRG funds to expand nancial incentives to ensure that whole home energy upgrades/retrots continue after the Home Energy Rebate (HER)federal funds are expended.Potential nancial incentives could include ongoing grants,new nancing or lending programs,including credit enhancements to make it more attractive for lenders to provide nancing for home energy upgrades. This new program proposal is meant to ensure that Utah’s HER program does not end after the state’s federal allocation for the home energy rebate program is expended.In addition to serving many more households after HER funds are expended,this proposal can potentially help support more Utah jobs in the home energy improvement market into the future. 2.Estimate of GHG and criteria pollutant emissions reductions UDAQ estimated GHG and criteria pollutant emission reductions based on assumptions made for an example program that would incentivize and deploy 500 units.Actual emissions reductions will vary depending on selected program parameters. GHG and Criteria Emissions Reductions (metric tons) NOx SO2 PM2.5 VOCs NH3 CO2e By 2030 3.3 6,560.8 By 2050 18.8 37,490.0 Quantication tool(s)utilized:ResStock Detailed Annual Total Savings per Dwelling Unit 3.Implementing agency or agencies The program could potentially be administered by UDAQ and/or UOED,although other eligible entities in Utah could apply for and administer this or a similar program. 4.Review of authority to implement BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 47 of 83 DRAFTUnderUtahCode19-1-201,the department [UDEQ]may perform the administrative functions of the boards established by Section 19-1-106,including the acceptance and administration of grants from the federal government and from other sources,public or private,to carry out the board's functions.Also under Utah Code 19-1-202,the [UDEQ] executive director may,with the approval of the governor,participate in the distribution, disbursement,or administration of any fund or service,advanced,offered,or contributed by the federal government for purposes consistent with the powers and duties of the department. Utah Code 19-1-105,creates the Utah Division of Air Quality to administer 19-2,Air Conservation Act.Under Utah Code 19-2-107,the [UDAQ]director may accept,receive,and administer grants or other funds or gifts from public and private agencies,including the federal government,for the purpose of carrying out any of the functions of the Air Conservation Act.Furthermore,UDAQ is eligible to apply for assistance under this solicitation,in accordance with 42 U.S.C.16131 and CFDA 66.039. Under Utah Code 79-6-401,by following the procedures and requirements of Title 63J, Chapter 5,Federal Funds Procedures Act,the office [Office of Energy Development]may seek federal grants or loans,seek to participate in federal programs,and,in accordance with applicable federal program guidelines,administer federally funded state energy programs. Under this authority OED administers building efficiency programs in Utah. 5.Implementation schedule and milestones Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Program development 125 units 125 units 125 units 125 units 6.Geographic location Statewide implementation. 7.Funding sources a.Funding needed to implement:$2,875,000 b.Complementary Funding: ●IIJA Division J Title VII -Home Energy Rebate (HER)program ●IRA 50121 -Home Energy Performance Based Whole-House Rebates ●IRA 13301 -Extension,Increase,and Modication of Nonbusiness Energy Property Credit (25C) ●IRA 50122 -High-Efficiency Electric Home Rebate Program ●IRA -Clean Energy Tax Credit BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 48 of 83 DRAFT●IRA -Energy Efficiency Home Improvement Credit ●Additionally,other current energy efficiency programs exist in Utah that are administered by Rocky Mountain Power and Dominion Energy. ●IIJA 40552 -Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) Program ●Rocky Mountain Power ’s WattSmart Home Programs c.Funding pursued by state or secured for implementation of this project: ●IIJA Division J Title VII -Home Energy Rebate (HER)program d.How additional implementation grant dollars are necessary to fund the measure: ●HER program:this funding must be spent within 10 years and some experts/stakeholders have stated that funds are likely to be exhausted within only 3 to 5 years. 8.Metrics for tracking progress For this measure,we use the following metrics to track progress:number of homes that received retrots,life of the houses/units retrotted,and number of performance years for implementation in order to quantify emissions reductions. 9.Quantitative cost estimates UDAQ assumed total deployment of 500 units at an incentive level of $5,000/unit,for a total incentive budget of $2,500,000,to which 15%in administrative expenses were added, for a total project budget of $2,875,000.Future implementation grant proposals from eligible entities,including UDAQ,may vary depending on selected project parameters. 10.LIDAC Benets/Analysis A new whole home retrots program would be open to all residents of Utah,and funding could be prioritized to low-income and moderate-income households and/or LIDAC areas in the state.Many parts of Utah include disadvantaged areas according to the IRA Disadvantaged Communities map. In addition to the general LIDAC benets associated with measures (see the LIDAC Analysis section of this Priority Plan)potential benets unique to this measure include: ●Reduced level of NOx,shown in this project’s Section 2 table; ●Improved energy efficiency. A potential unique disbenet is the high nancial cost of retrots.This program intends to mitigate the cost concerns,by providing an additional nancial incentive for retrots.For detailed information about UDAQ LIDAC engagement,see the Coordination and Outreach section of this Priority Plan. Project #2 -Residential Pre-Weatherization Program 1.Project Description: BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 49 of 83 DRAFTUseCPRGfundstocreateanewPre-Weatherization (or “Pre-WAP”)Program in Utah that addresses severe conditions in low-income homes that would cause a home to be deferred from the Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP).Potential nancial incentives could include ongoing grants and technical assistance navigating incentives. This would be a new standalone program for Utah,but it would make existing measures such as Utah’s WAP more effective.These repairs will enable otherwise deferred low-income homes to access incentives for weatherization,as well as efficiency, electrication,and renewables.Other states currently or have previously implemented this type of program.5 2.Estimate of GHG and criteria pollutant emissions reductions UDAQ estimated GHG and criteria pollutant emission reductions based on assumptions made for an example program that would incentivize and deploy 75 units.Actual emissions reductions will vary depending on selected program parameters. GHG and Criteria Emissions Reductions (metric tons) NOx SO2 PM2.5 VOCs NH3 CO2e By 2030 0.3 492.6 By 2050 1.5 2,463.0 Quantication tool(s)utilized:DWS program data,EIA natural gas consumption data 3.Implementing agency or agencies As envisioned,the Pre-WAP program would be administered by UDWS.They could also issue a competitive Request for Proposal (RFP)for a third-party to administer the program in conjunction with the state’s WAP program.Other eligible entities in Utah could apply for and administer this or a similar program. Multiple states could jointly issue an RFP for a single third-party program administrator.A shared third-party administrator could make efficient use of limited capacity and expertise,and there could be economies of scale in the administration of these programs. Multiple states in a coalition could also use separate administrators but share market research,marketing materials and digital strategies to increase buy-in and trust within a region.These states could also share workforce training or standards to increase the pool of labor performing these services. 4.Review of authority to implement 5 Examples of similar programs include:Connecticut through their Residential Energy Preparation Services (REPs)and Delaware through their Pre-Weatherization Program.Both Connecticut and Delaware use third-party administrators. BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 50 of 83 DRAFTUnderUtahCode35A-8-202,the division [Utah Division of Workforce Services (DWS)]shall support economic development activities through grants,loans,and direct programs nancial assistance. The division may,by following the procedures and requirements of Title 63J,Chapter 5, Federal Funds Procedures Act,seek federal grants,loans,or participation in federal programs.Additionally,if any federal program requires the expenditure of state funds as a condition to participation by the state in any fund,property,or service,with the governor's approval,[the division may]expend whatever funds are necessary out of the money provided by the Legislature for the use of the department. Under this authority,DWS administers Utah's Weatherization Assistance Program. 5.Implementation schedule and milestones Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 15 units 15 units 15 units 15 units 15 units 6.Geographic location Statewide implementation. 7.Funding sources a.Funding needed to implement:$862,500 b.Complementary Funding: ●American Rescue Plan Act ●IIJA 40551 -Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP) ●IIJA Division J Title VII -Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program ●Rocky Mountain Power ’s WattSmart Home Programs c.Funding pursued by state or secured for implementation of this project: ●American Rescue Plan Act ●IIJA 40551 -Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP) d.How additional implementation grant dollars are necessary to fund the measure: ●While Utah currently has used some existing funding sources (ARPA,WAP)for pre-weatherization,the need for Utah’s low-income households is much greater than these existing funding sources.CPRG funds could greatly extend the reach of the existing program. 8.Metrics for tracking progress For this measure,we use the following metrics to track progress:number of houses/residential units pre-weatherized,life of the houses/units pre-weatherized,and number of performance years for implementation in order to quantify emissions reductions. BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 51 of 83 DRAFT9.Quantitative cost estimates UDAQ assumed total deployment of 75 units at an incentive level of $10,000/unit,for a total incentive budget of $750,000,to which 15%in administrative expenses were added, for a total project budget of $862,500.Future implementation grant proposals from eligible entities,including UDAQ,may vary depending on selected project parameters. 10.LIDAC Benets/Analysis The Pre-WAP program would help low-income families across the state.Many parts of Utah include disadvantaged areas according to the IRA Disadvantaged Communities map. As an income-qualied program,Pre-WAP intends to target the population that is typically less nancially able to make critical home repairs themselves and less likely to access funding that could help. In addition to the general LIDAC benets associated with measures (see the LIDAC Analysis section of this Priority Plan)potential benets unique to this measure include: ●Reduced level of NOx,shown in this project’s Section 2 table; ●Directly improved health of residents (e.g.,removing issues such as mold,asbestos, vermiculite,and other conditions,which improves air quality,prevents disease and injury,and protects vulnerable individuals such as people with asthma,children,the elderly,and immunocompromised individuals) ●Directly improved housing quality,comfort,and safety; ●Indirect benets include: ○Reduced utility bills (reducing energy burden allows individuals to spend more on groceries and medicine); ○Decreased electricity generation and resulting pollution (improves local air quality and reduces adverse health effects,particularly asthma); ○Enabled solar generation development on roofs,which reduces electricity generation and utility bills. Potential disbenets include the need for additional outreach/staffing for pre-weatherization to LIDAC households;this can be mitigated through allocating funding specically for outreach/staffing purposes.For detailed information about UDAQ LIDAC engagement,see the Coordination and Outreach section. Project #3 -Residential Heat Pump Program 1.Project Description: Use CPRG funds to create a new heat pump incentive program in Utah for low-income households.For residents that live in low-income housing and/or meet other income-qualied criteria,the state will buy-down or otherwise augment existing utility program subsidies to reduce the cost of heat pumps. BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 52 of 83 DRAFTElectrifyingbuildingheatingandcoolingreducesfossilfuelconsumption,and heat pumps are efficient two-way electric appliances that heat and cool by moving heat into and out of a building.To encourage heat pump adoption,DWS can create a program (or revise their existing weatherization program)to incentivize residents to replace fully natural gas-fueled heating with primarily electric heat pumps that have natural gas as a backup. There are potential models for this type of program from other states.6 2.Estimate of GHG and criteria pollutant emissions reductions UDAQ estimated GHG and criteria pollutant emission reductions based on assumptions made for an example program that would incentivize and deploy 500 units.Actual emissions reductions will vary depending on selected program parameters. GHG and Criteria Emissions Reductions (metric tons) NOx SO2 PM2.5 VOCs NH3 CO2e By 2030 2.6 5,059.3 By 2050 14.8 28,910.0 Quantication tool(s)utilized:ResStock Detailed Annual Total Savings per Dwelling Unit 3.Implementing agency or agencies As envisioned,the program would be administered by Utah DWS.They could also issue a competitive Request for Proposal (RFP)for a third-party to administer the program in conjunction with the state’s WAP program.Other eligible entities in Utah could apply for and administer this or a similar program. 4.Review of authority to implement Under Utah Code 35A-8-202,the division [UDWS]shall support economic development activities through grants,loans,and direct programs nancial assistance. The division may,by following the procedures and requirements of Title 63J,Chapter 5, Federal Funds Procedures Act,seek federal grants,loans,or participation in federal programs.Additionally,if any federal program requires the expenditure of state funds as a condition to participation by the state in any fund,property,or service,with the governor's approval,[the division may]expend whatever funds are necessary out of the money provided by the Legislature for the use of the department. Under this authority,DWS administers Utah's Weatherization Assistance Program. 5.Implementation schedule and milestones 6 Examples include: ●Efficiency Trust Maine ●Colorado provides tax credit exemptions for heat pumps. ●Rhode Island also delivers heat pump incentives. BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 53 of 83 DRAFTYear1Year2Year3Year4Year5 Program development 125 units 125 units 125 units 125 units 6.Geographic location Statewide implementation. 7.Funding sources a.Funding needed to implement:$2,875,000 b.Complementary Funding: ●IIJA Division J Title VII -Home Energy Rebate (HER)program ●IRA 50121 -Home Energy Performance Based Whole-House Rebates ●IRA 13301 -Extension,Increase,and Modication of Nonbusiness Energy Property Credit (25C) ●IRA 13302 -Residential Clean Energy Credit (25D) ●IRA 50122 -High-Efficiency Electric Home Rebate Program ●IRA -Clean Energy Tax Credit ●IRA -Energy Efficiency Home Improvement Credit ●Additionally,other current energy efficiency programs exist in Utah that are administered by Rocky Mountain Power and Dominion Energy. ●IIJA 40552 -Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG)Program ●Rocky Mountain Power ’s WattSmart Home Programs c.Funding pursued by state or secured for implementation of this project: ●IIJA Division J Title VII -Home Energy Rebate (HER)program d.How additional implementation grant dollars are necessary to fund the measure: ●There is other federal funding available for heat pumps;however,existing funding will not be enough for Utah households.UOED is applying for funding under the High Efficiency Electric Home Rebate Act (HEEHRA)program,but we believe that the $4.275 billion that will be distributed among several states will not allow us to deploy enough heat pumps to meet demand. ●Additionally,there is currently a lack of adequate funding /resources for heat pumps targeted to low-income households in Utah specically.DWS experiences challenges with current federal funding sources from DOE due to requirements related to energy savings ratios and the inability to buy down the cost of equipment .CPRG funding can help ll this gap,in order for more LIDAC households in Utah to access heat pumps. 8.Metrics for tracking progress For this measure,we use the following metrics to track progress:number of heat pumps deployed,heat pump life,number of performance years for implementation and weatherization program data in order to quantify emissions reductions. BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 54 of 83 DRAFT9.Quantitative cost estimates UDAQ assumed total deployment of 500 units at an incentive level of $5,000/unit,for a total incentive budget of $2,500,000,to which 15%in administrative expenses were added, for a total project budget of $2,875,000.Future implementation grant proposals from eligible entities,including UDAQ,may vary depending on selected project parameters. 10.LIDAC Benets/Analysis Electric heat pumps are two-way electric appliances that heat and cool by moving heat into and out of a building.Heat pumps are more efficient per unit of energy input than other kinds of heating equipment.The Heat Pump program would help low-income households across the state by producing energy cost savings and improving comfort. Many parts of Utah include disadvantaged areas according to the IRA Disadvantaged Communities map. In addition to the general LIDAC benets associated with measures (see the LIDAC Analysis section of this Priority Plan)potential benets unique to this measure include: ●Reduced level of NOx,shown in this project’s Section 2 table; ●Directly improved indoor air quality and reduced criteria pollutants,so heat pumps can have direct health benets in LIDAC communities that typically have higher rates of asthma and other respiratory illnesses; ●Reduced energy costs/energy burden,since heat pumps are efficient and can help consumers save money every year on their energy bills.A high-energy burden is associated with additional health ailments,and reducing energy costs could have additional health benets for LIDAC communities. Potential disbenets include the need for additional education and training about how to operate/maintain the heat pumps with LIDAC households;this can be mitigated through allocating funding specically for education/training purposes.For detailed information about UDAQ LIDAC engagement,see the Coordination and Outreach section. Project #4 -K-12 School/Public Building Program 1.Project Description: a.Brief description Use CPRG funds to create a new heat pump/other efficient equipment incentive program in Utah for K-12 schools and other public community buildings such as libraries, community/recreation centers,etc.The program would cover incremental costs for new heat pumps/equipment and/or retrots. This project was identied by one or more stakeholders and/or UDAQ staff.UDAQ is seeking feedback on program design and quantication of costs,emission reductions,and other program parameters. BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 55 of 83 DRAFTIndustrial Measure #7 -Facility Energy Eiciency This measure intends to voluntarily increase industrial/commercial energy efficiency efforts in Utah.Below is a specic example of a type of project for this measure. Project #1 -StepWise Industrial Assessment Program 1.Project Description: Use CPRG funds to continue the Intermountain Industrial Assessment Center (IIAC) StepWise Program which involves eligible commercial and industrial customers receiving a no-cost energy efficiency assessment that will identify measures for reducing energy usage and emissions.Customers receive a customized report that shows where improvements can be made,approximately how much those improvements will cost ,how long it will take for the improvements to pay back,and project ongoing savings. Several states currently or have previously implemented this type of program through the U.S.Department of Energy's Industrial Assessment Centers Program.This would build upon/scale up the existing Utah StepWise Program,currently administered by the University of Utah’s Intermountain Industrial Assessment Center. 2.Estimate of GHG and criteria pollutant emissions reductions The IIAC utilized both AVERT and eGRID and data collected from the program and only counted emissions reductions from recommended measures that were actually implemented (or under implementation). GHG and Criteria Emissions Reductions (metric tons) NOx SO2 PM2.5 VOCs NH3 CO2e By 2030 179.4 19.1 5.8 3.6 0.2 101,457.0 By 2050 358.8 38.1 11.5 7.3 0.4 202,914.0 Quantication tool(s)utilized:AVERT and eGRID,U of U IIAC program data 3.Implementing agency or agencies As envisioned,the University of Utah IACC would be the lead agency with student training assistance from Weber State University. 4.Review of authority to implement Under Utah Code 53B-7-103,the board [Utah Board of Higher Education]is the designated state educational agency authorized to negotiate and contract with the federal government and to accept nancial or other assistance from the federal government or any of its BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 56 of 83 DRAFTagenciesinthenameofandinbehalfofthestateofUtah,under terms and conditions as may be prescribed by congressional enactment designed to further higher education. Subject to policies and procedures established by the board,an institution of higher education and the institution of higher education's employees may apply for and receive grants or research and development contracts within the educational role of the recipient institution.A program [as described above]may be conducted by and through the institution,or by and through any foundation or organization that is established for the purpose of assisting the institution in the accomplishment of the institution's purposes. An institution or the institution's foundation or organization engaged in a program authorized by the board may enter into contracts with federal,state,or local governments or their subsidiary agencies or departments,with private organizations,companies,rms, or industries,or with individuals for conducting the authorized programs.One may also accept contributions,grants,or gifts from,and enter into contracts and cooperative agreements with,any private organization,company,rm,industry,or individual,or any governmental agency or department ,for support of authorized programs within the educational role of the recipient institution,and may agree to provide matching funds with respect to those programs from resources available to the institution. Under this authority,the University of Utah IIAC currently administers the state of Utah’s existing weatherization assistance program for which it receives funding from DOE.The StepWise program ratepayer funding was established through Utah Code 54-20-105,but will no longer be available after February 2024. 5.Implementation schedule and milestones Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Extend existing StepWise Program for ve years 6.Geographic location Statewide implementation. 7.Funding sources a.Funding needed to implement:$2,500,000 b.Complementary Funding: ●IIJA 40521 -Industrial Research and Assessment Centers ●IRA 60107 -Low Emissions Electricity Program c.Funding pursued by state or secured for implementation of this project: ●IIJA 40521 -Industrial Research and Assessment Centers d.How additional implementation grant dollars are necessary to fund the measure: BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 57 of 83 DRAFT●Dominion Energy funding for a portion of this existing program is no longer available,signicantly limiting the reach and efficacy of the program. 8.Metrics for tracking progress For this measure,we use the following metrics to track progress:number of facilities assessed,energy efficiency savings,and number of performance years for implementation in order to quantify emissions reductions. 9.Quantitative cost estimates UDAQ assumed extending the existing Dominion Energy-funded StepWise program for ve years at a cost of $500,000 per year for a total budget of $2,500,000.Future implementation grant proposals from eligible entities,including the University of Utah or UDAQ,may vary depending on selected project parameters. 10.LIDAC Benets/Analysis The extended energy assessment program would be open to commercial and industrial entities throughout Utah,including facilities in LIDAC areas.Many parts of Utah include disadvantaged areas according to the IRA Disadvantaged Communities map. In addition to the general LIDAC benets associated with measures (see the LIDAC Analysis section of this Priority Plan)potential benets unique to this measure include: ●Reduced level of NOx,SO2,PM2.5,VOCs,NH3 shown in this project’s Section 2 table. For detailed information about UDAQ LIDAC engagement,see the Coordination and Outreach section of this Priority Plan. Measure #8 -Oil/Gas Methane Emission Reductions This measure intends to voluntarily reduce methane emissions related to the Oil/Gas industry. Project #1 -Uinta Basin Oil/Gas Electrification Program 1.Project Description: Use CPRG funds to create a new Uinta Basin Electrication program which would fund microgrids,solar farms,site solar,highline/shoreline for pumpjack engines with the Oil/Gas industry. BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 58 of 83 DRAFTThisprojectwasidentied by one or more stakeholders and/or UDAQ staff.UDAQ is seeking feedback on program design and quantication of costs,emission reductions,and other program parameters. 2.Estimate of GHG and criteria pollutant emissions reductions More information needed. 3.Implementing agency or agencies As envisioned,UDAQ would be the lead agency,although other eligible entities in Utah could apply for and administer this or a similar program. 4.Review of authority to implement Under Utah Code 19-1-201,the department [UDEQ]may perform the administrative functions of the boards established by Section 19-1-106,including the acceptance and administration of grants from the federal government and from other sources,public or private,to carry out the board's functions.Also under Utah Code 19-1-202,the [UDEQ] executive director may,with the approval of the governor,participate in the distribution, disbursement,or administration of any fund or service,advanced,offered,or contributed by the federal government for purposes consistent with the powers and duties of the department. Utah Code 19-1-105,creates the Utah Division of Air Quality to administer 19-2,Air Conservation Act.Under Utah Code 19-2-107,the [UDAQ]director may accept,receive,and administer grants or other funds or gifts from public and private agencies,including the federal government,for the purpose of carrying out any of the functions of the Air Conservation Act.Furthermore,UDAQ is eligible to apply for assistance under this solicitation,in accordance with 42 U.S.C.16131 and CFDA 66.039. 5.Implementation schedule and milestones More information needed. 6.Geographic location Implementation in the Uinta Basin. 7.Funding sources a.Funding needed to implement:More information needed. b.Complementary Funding: ●IRA 22004 -USDA Assistance for Rural Electric Cooperatives ●IRA 60105 -Funding to Address Air Pollution:Methane Monitoring ●IRA 60113 -Methane Emissions Reduction Program BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 59 of 83 DRAFT●IIJA 40552 -Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) Program ●IIJA 40601 -Funding to Support Orphan Well Plugging c.Funding pursued by state or secured for implementation of this project: ●IRA 60113 -Methane Emissions Reduction Program d.How additional implementation grant dollars are necessary to fund the measure: ●Options to electrify oil and gas operations extend beyond regulatorily required equipment such as pneumatics to non-required equipment such as pump jack and other engines which have been identied as large emitters of methane and VOCs.The co-pollutant VOC reductions associated with this program are particularly important in Utah’s Uinta Basin,which is a marginal nonattainment area for ozone.While additional program funding may become available under the Methane Emissions Reduction Program,it is critical to begin reducing emissions in this sector immediately to address climate and ozone challenges. 8.Metrics for tracking progress More information needed. 9.Quantitative cost estimates More information needed. 10.LIDAC Benets/Analysis A new Uinta Basin Electrication program would be open to oil/gas entities in that region of Utah.Many parts of Utah’s Uinta Basin include disadvantaged areas according to the IRA Disadvantaged Communities map. In addition to the general LIDAC benets associated with measures (see the LIDAC Analysis section of this Priority Plan)potential benets unique to this measure include: ●Reduced level of VOCs,shown in this project’s Section 2 table; ●By reducing methane,co-pollutants which contribute to ground-level ozone can be reduced.In recent years,concentrations of wintertime ozone in the Uinta Basin have reached or exceeded the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS),raising concerns about the health and environmental impacts of elevated ozone levels in the Basin.Reducing the concentration of methane in the Basin is an important health and environmental goal of this project. For detailed information about UDAQ LIDAC engagement,see the Coordination and Outreach section of this Priority Plan. Project #2 -Uinta Basin Energy Recovery and Infrastructure Improvements 1.Project Description: BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 60 of 83 DRAFTThisprojectseekstoreduceGHGemissionsbyleveragingCPRGfundingtoacceleratethe electrication of oil and gas production sites located within the Uinta Basin by working with technology partners and oil and gas operators to develop and deploy an optimized power grid.This project has the potential to enable rapid and scalable technologies in remote oil and gas elds,which could result in the realization of huge amounts of future CH4 emissions both within and beyond the state of Utah. The University of Utah Energy and Geoscience Institute (EGI)has proposed a demonstration project which will develop optimized electric powered microgrids allowing for the electrication of substantial portions of oil and gas operations.This process will allow for substantial emission reductions at the production sites,eliminating the need for fossil fuel powered infrastructure like pump jacks which have been shown to be a major source of CH4 emissions.This process would work by converting excess or waste eld gas into electricity resulting in signicantly decreased emissions.As the Uinta Basin is not the only remote oil and gas eld where remote electrication could result in large scale emission reductions,this project could scale to other production elds beyond Utah. This project was identied by one or more stakeholders and/or UDAQ staff.UDAQ is seeking feedback on program design and quantication of costs,emission reductions,and other program parameters. 2.Estimate of GHG and criteria pollutant emissions reductions The UDAQ is seeking additional feedback from stakeholders on what the potential emission reductions associated with this enabling measure could be.The total CO2e emissions associated with gas equipment at production sites in the Uinta Basin that could be electried is 13,129 metric tons per year,showing the high ceiling of this transformative measure just within the Uinta Basin. 3.Implementing agency or agencies EGI has proposed this project,and therefore the University of Utah in collaboration with EGI would be the implementing agency,with the UDEQ providing assistance where appropriate. 4.Review of authority to implement Under Utah Code 19-1-201,the department [UDEQ]may perform the administrative functions of the boards established by Section 19-1-106,including the acceptance and administration of grants from the federal government and from other sources,public or private,to carry out the board's functions.Also under Utah Code 19-1-202,the [UDEQ] executive director may,with the approval of the governor,participate in the distribution, disbursement,or administration of any fund or service,advanced,offered,or contributed by the federal government for purposes consistent with the powers and duties of the department. BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 61 of 83 DRAFTUtahCode19-1-105,creates the Utah Division of Air Quality to administer 19-2,Air Conservation Act.Under Utah Code 19-2-107,the [UDAQ]director may accept,receive,and administer grants or other funds or gifts from public and private agencies,including the federal government,for the purpose of carrying out any of the functions of the Air Conservation Act.Furthermore,UDAQ is eligible to apply for assistance under this solicitation,in accordance with 42 U.S.C.16131 and CFDA 66.039. Under Utah Code 53B-7-103,the board [Utah Board of Higher Education]is the designated state educational agency authorized to negotiate and contract with the federal government and to accept nancial or other assistance from the federal government or any of its agencies in the name of and in behalf of the state of Utah,under terms and conditions as may be prescribed by congressional enactment designed to further higher education. Subject to policies and procedures established by the board,an institution of higher education and the institution of higher education's employees may apply for and receive grants or research and development contracts within the educational role of the recipient institution.A program [as described above]may be conducted by and through the institution,or by and through any foundation or organization that is established for the purpose of assisting the institution in the accomplishment of the institution's purposes. An institution or the institution's foundation or organization engaged in a program authorized by the board may enter into contracts with federal,state,or local governments or their subsidiary agencies or departments,with private organizations,companies,rms, or industries,or with individuals for conducting the authorized programs.One may also accept contributions,grants,or gifts from,and enter into contracts and cooperative agreements with,any private organization,company,rm,industry,or individual,or any governmental agency or department ,for support of authorized programs within the educational role of the recipient institution,and may agree to provide matching funds with respect to those programs from resources available to the institution. 5.Implementation schedule and milestones UDAQ is seeking additional feedback from stakeholders on what the implementation schedule could be for this project. Milestones for this project include ve distinct processes: 1)Perform a thorough evaluation of needs and possible solutions including analysis of electrication pathways and identication of possible constraints,including access, regulatory and supply-chain issues. 2)Study the applicability of implementation of promising technology including emission reductions and economic evaluation. BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 62 of 83 DRAFT3)Identify auxiliary and/or complementary technologies which further accelerate electrication. 4)Create and execute an implementation plan. 5)Conduct a detailed analysis on the effectiveness of implementation and identify other areas of electrication and associated emissions reductions. 6.Geographic location The Uinta Basin oil and gas eld is located in Uintah and Duchesne counties,which are located in eastern rural Utah. 7.Funding sources a.Funding needed to implement: The UDAQ is seeking additional feedback from stakeholders on what the level of funding would be required for this project. b.Complementary Funding: ●IIJA 40209 -Advanced Energy Manufacturing and Recycling Grants ●IRA 60113 -Methane Emissions Reduction Program ●IRA 21001 -Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) ●IRA 50144 -Energy Infrastructure Reinvestment Financing c.Funding pursued by state or secured for implementation of this project: ●More information needed. d.How additional implementation grant dollars are necessary to fund the measure: ■More information needed. 8.Metrics for tracking progress The primary metric for tracking progress would be the number of pieces of equipment electried at oil and/or gas production sites. For this project,the following metrics to track progress were utilized:type and number of pieces of equipment electried,and number of performance years for equipment in order to quantify emissions reductions. 9.Quantitative cost estimates More information needed. 10.LIDAC Benets/Analysis A Uinta Basin Energy Recovery and Infrastructure Improvement project would be conducted in parallel with,and would benet,oil and gas entities operating within the Uinta Basin of Utah.Many parts of Utah’s Uinta Basin include disadvantaged areas according to the IRA Disadvantaged Communities map. In addition to the general benets associated with measures (see the LIDAC Analysis section of this Priority Plan)potential benets unique to this measure include: BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 63 of 83 DRAFT●Reduced level of VOCs,shown in this project’s Section 2 table; ●By reducing methane,co-pollutants which contribute to ground-level ozone can be reduced.In recent years,concentrations of wintertime ozone in the Uinta Basin have reached or exceeded the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS),raising concerns about the health and environmental impacts of elevated ozone levels in the Basin.Reducing the concentration of methane in the Basin is an important health and environmental goal of this project. Project #3 -Uinta Basin Oil/Gas Thief Hatch Replacement Program 1.Project Description: Use CPRG funds to create a new Uinta Basin program which would fund Thief Hatch Replacements for the Oil/Gas industry.Current state rules require that storage tank thief hatches remain closed unless removing liquids or maintenance or operating activities however the rules do not have an engineering standard specied.Through many years of inspections by compliance staff approximately 80%of identied fugitive emissions via infrared camera observations are located at the thief hatches on storage tanks.This is due to under engineered pieces of equipment that do not wear well with the vapor pressure levels inside of the storage tank,frequent gauging of tank levels,dirt and debris buildup, failed gaskets and also the lack of proper closure after liquid unloading.The program would encourage the replacement of the current thief hatches with well designed thief hatches that can better withstand the tank vapor pressures,gaskets that will not be damaged by gauging and also be combined with remote tank tilt sensors that can notify operators that the thief hatch has been left open.Operators that have upgraded their thief hatches have seen reductions in mechanical issues and as such reduced emissions.The program would also encourage the combination of better designed thief hatches with remote sensors that can inform the operators if a thief hatch has been left open and can close the thief hatch in a rapid manner.This program would be open to all operators in the Uinta Basin and cover the full cost of the equipment required. 2.Estimate of GHG and criteria pollutant emissions reductions The emissions reductions are based off of the gap lling line items for the tank control effectiveness adjustment for Utah’s 2017 oil and gas inventory.These estimates were made using a monte carlo simulation,and were based on studies showing that about 30%of the time controlled tanks experience emissions not making it to their intended control device. Utah compliance inspections showed that when emissions weren’t making it to the combustor that about 58%it was due to an open or leaking thief hatch.We in turn applied 58%of the tank control effectiveness emissions to thief hatch failures.There is also the understanding that thief hatch seals may still fail and that thief hatches may still be left open.To account for that we estimate that the replacement will reduce the existing thief hatch emissions by 50%.The emissions were then apportioned to oil and gas facilities to get a per facility reduction estimate.A CH4/VOC ratio was developed using Uinta Basin BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 64 of 83 DRAFTCompositionStudydatatoestimatemethaneemissions.On oil facilities the 2017 Utah oil and gas emissions inventory showed an average of 3.4 tanks on oil facilities and an average of 2.0 tanks on gas facilities.To effectively mitigate thief hatch emissions on a facility it's recommended to replace all thief hatches at the facility.At a given facility it was estimated that 49.405 metric tons/yr of CO2e at an oil facility and 96.96 metric tons/yr of CO2e at a gas facility could be eliminated.This is under the assumption that replacing old thief hatches with good seals and potential monitors that notify the operators when open would reduce all failed thief hatch emissions.Thief hatch replacement would also have a co-pollutant reduction for VOCs of 3.83 metric tons/yr for oil facilities and 0.83 tons/yr for gas facilities. UDAQ estimated GHG and criteria pollutant emission reductions based on assumptions made for an example program that would incentivize and deploy X units.Actual emissions reductions will vary depending on selected program parameters. Table 1.Oil Facility GHG and Criteria Emissions Reductions (metric tons) NOx SO2 PM2.5 VOCs NH3 CO2e By 2030 8,053 51,875 By 2050 23,010 148,215 Table 2.Gas Facility GHG and Criteria Emissions Reductions (metric tons) NOx SO2 PM2.5 VOCs NH3 CO2e By 2030 581 33,939 By 2050 1,660 96,969 Quantication tool(s)utilized:See detailed quantication narrative above 3.Implementing agency or agencies As envisioned,UDAQ would be the lead agency,although other eligible entities in Utah could apply for and administer this or a similar program. 4.Review of authority to implement Under Utah Code 19-1-201,the department [UDEQ]may perform the administrative functions of the boards established by Section 19-1-106,including the acceptance and administration of grants from the federal government and from other sources,public or private,to carry out the board's functions.Also under Utah Code 19-1-202,the [UDEQ] executive director may,with the approval of the governor,participate in the distribution, disbursement,or administration of any fund or service,advanced,offered,or contributed BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 65 of 83 DRAFTbythefederalgovernmentforpurposesconsistentwiththepowersanddutiesofthe department. Utah Code 19-1-105,creates the Utah Division of Air Quality to administer 19-2,Air Conservation Act.Under Utah Code 19-2-107,the [UDAQ]director may accept,receive,and administer grants or other funds or gifts from public and private agencies,including the federal government,for the purpose of carrying out any of the functions of the Air Conservation Act.Furthermore,UDAQ is eligible to apply for assistance under this solicitation,in accordance with 42 U.S.C.16131 and CFDA 66.039. 5.Implementation schedule and milestones We anticipate that 70 oil and gas facilities could be switched out per year starting in year two. Oil Facility -Performance Period Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Program Development 150 150 150 150 Gas Facility -Performance Period Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Program Development 50 50 50 50 6.Geographic location Implementation in the Uinta Basin;potential to expand to other oil and gas producing regions of the state. 7.Funding sources a.Funding needed to implement:$2,815,200 (oil);$552,000 (gas);$3,367,200 (combined) b.Complementary Funding: ●IRA 21001 -Environmental Quality Incentives Program ●IRA 60113 -Methane Emissions Reduction Program ●IIJA 40552 -Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) Program c.Funding pursued by state or secured for implementation of this project: ●IRA 60113 -Methane Emissions Reduction Program d.How additional implementation grant dollars are necessary to fund the measure: ●More information needed. BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 66 of 83 DRAFT8.Metrics for tracking progress We have given the thief hatches a useful life of 10 years and a cost of $1200 to replace one thief hatch.We would like to implement 150 oil facilities per year and 50 gas facilities per year.The average number of thief hatches to be replaced would be 3.4 at an oil facility and 2 at a gas facility. 9.Quantitative cost estimates At an oil facility,the cost would be $4,080 to reduce 24.70 metric tons of CO2e (3.83 metric tons VOC)annually.At a gas facility,the cost would be $2,400 to reduce 48.48 metric tons of CO2e (0.83 metric tons VOC)annually.Importantly,the above estimates conservatively assume that the replacement thief hatches reduce 50 percent of total historical emissions at controlled facilities (i.e.,those with ares). Future implementation grant proposals from eligible entities will vary depending on selected program parameters. 10.LIDAC Benets/Analysis A new Uinta Basin Thief Hatch Replacement program would be open to oil/gas entities in that region of Utah.Many parts of Utah’s Uinta Basin include disadvantaged areas according to the IRA Disadvantaged Communities map. In addition to the general LIDAC benets associated with measures (see the LIDAC Analysis section of this Priority Plan)potential benets unique to this measure include: ●Reduced level of VOCs,shown in this project’s Section 2 table; ●By reducing methane,co-pollutants which contribute to ground-level ozone can be reduced.In recent years,concentrations of wintertime ozone in the Uinta Basin have reached or exceeded the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS),raising concerns about the health and environmental impacts of elevated ozone levels in the Basin.Reducing the concentration of methane in the Basin is an important health and environmental goal of this project. For detailed information about UDAQ LIDAC engagement,see the Coordination and Outreach section of this Priority Plan. Project #4 -Uinta Basin Oil/Gas Flyover Program for Leak Detection 1.Project Description: This project would establish a Utah yover and leak detection and repair program (LDAR) similar to the Colorado Ongoing Basin Emissions (COBE)program,which is led by Colorado State University (CSU)in coordination with the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment and aerospace sensing companies.A similar program could be developed for BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 67 of 83 DRAFTUtah’s Uinta Basin,potentially with the assistance of Utah State University and other partners. This project was identied by one or more stakeholders and/or UDAQ staff.UDAQ is seeking feedback on program design and quantication of costs,emission reductions,and other program parameters. 2.Estimate of GHG and criteria pollutant emissions reductions Estimates from aerospace operators suggest the potential to reduce emissions of over 1,800,000 MCF from upstream production-related assets and pipelines per survey. More information is needed to put this potential project into context with other measures/projects in this Priority Plan. Electric Power Measure #9 -Renewable Energy This measure intends to voluntarily increase the deployment of renewable energy in Utah through incentives and/or direct deployment efforts.Below are specic examples of types of projects for this measure. Project #1 -Community Choice Renewable Program 1.Project Description: Use CPRG funds to support a Community Choice Renewable Program in Utah.Utah Renewable Communities (URC)aims to offer customers a choice to supplement their current energy mix with renewable energy at a minimal cost increase. The Utah Community Renewable Energy Act,which was enacted by the Utah Legislature in 2019,allows for the creation of a Program to enable eligible Utah communities to acquire renewable energy resources to serve participating customers.All costs of the Program must be paid for by the customers within the communities who participate in the Program, and customers may elect to leave the Program at any time.The URC Program would seek to use an EPA CPRG implementation grant to build a nancial reserve fund for renewable energy resources acquired to serve participating customers.This reserve fund would be used to satisfy the legal requirement that “non-participating customers and the utility will not be subject to any program liabilities or costs,”even if participation in this voluntary program drops to zero.An EPA CPRG Implementation Grant request to support the URC program can also be tailored to support a smaller initial renewable energy resource BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 68 of 83 DRAFTacquisition–for example,pairing the initial acquisition down from 400 MW of combined solar and wind to only 200 MW of solar or less (with correspondingly smaller initial emissions reductions).As the Program pays down an initial resource,a corresponding portion of the reserve fund will be freed up to backstop another renewable energy resource. This project was identied by one or more stakeholders and/or UDAQ staff.UDAQ is seeking feedback on quantication of costs and other program parameters. 2.Estimate of GHG and criteria pollutant emissions reductions The following emissions reductions reect an illustrative case in which the URC program fully meets its net-100%renewable electricity goal by acquiring energy from a new 200 MW solar project and a new 200 MW wind project.Actual emissions reductions will vary depending on selected program parameters. Estimate of emission reductions received from URC stakeholders:636,000 metric tons of CO2e annually 3.Implementing agency or agencies The participating municipalities in the URC program,including Salt Lake City,would lead and administer this program. 4.Review of authority to implement Utah Code 54-17-9,Utah Community Renewable Energy Act,allows for the creation of a Program to enable eligible Utah communities to acquire renewable energy resources to serve participating customers.Final implementation of this program requires the approval of an application submitted by a qualied utility by the Utah Public Service Commission (PSC).Of 23 eligible communities,18 joined by the participation deadline,paving the way for application submittal to the PSC. 5.Implementation schedule and milestones More information needed. 6.Geographic location The following municipalities/communities in Utah have signed on to participate in this program: ●Town of Castle Valley ●Moab ●Grand County ●Springdale ●Kearns ●Salt Lake City ●Millcreek ●Cottonwood Heights ●Holladay ●Emigration Canyon ●Alta ●Salt Lake County BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 69 of 83 DRAFT●Ogden ●Park City ●Francis ●Oakley ●Coalville ●Summit County 7.Funding sources a.Funding needed to implement:More information needed. b.Complementary Funding: ●IRA 13801 -Elective Payment for Energy Property and Electricity Produced from Certain Renewable Resources,etc. ●IRA 22001 -Electric Loans for Renewable Energy ●IRA 22002 -Rural Energy for America Program ●IIJA 40552 -Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) Program ●IIJA -Pumped Storage Hydropower Wind and Solar Integration and System Reliability Initiative ●IRA 60103 -GHG Reduction Fund zero-emission Technologies Grant Program ●IRA 60107 -Low Emissions Electricity Program ●IIJA Division J Title VII -Home Energy Rebate (HER)program ●IRA 50121 -Home Energy Performance Based Whole-House Rebates ●IRA 13301 -Extension,Increase,and Modication of Nonbusiness Energy Property Credit (25C) ●IRA 13302 -Residential Clean Energy Credit (25D) ●IRA 50122 -High-Efficiency Electric Home Rebate Program ●IRA -Clean Energy Tax Credit ●IRA -Energy Efficiency Home Improvement Credit c.Funding pursued by state or secured for implementation of this project: ●Ratepayers in participating URC communities would pay for the bulk of this program under the provisions of the Utah Community Renewable Energy Act. d.How additional implementation grant dollars are necessary to fund the measure: Because all costs of the Program must be paid for by the customers within the communities who participate in the Program,and customers may elect to leave the Program at any time.The URC Program would seek to use an EPA CPRG implementation grant to build a nancial reserve fund for renewable energy resources acquired to serve participating customers.This reserve fund would be used to satisfy the legal requirement that “non-participating customers and the utility will not be subject to any program liabilities or costs,”even if participation in this voluntary program drops to zero. 8.Metrics for tracking progress For this measure,we use the following metrics to track progress:number of households served by renewable energy,renewable energy system life,and number of performance years for implementation in order to quantify emissions reductions. BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 70 of 83 DRAFT9.Quantitative cost estimates While emission estimates reect an illustrative case in which the URC program fully meets its net-100%renewable electricity goal by acquiring energy from a new 200 MW solar project and a new 200 MW wind project,total project costs at this time are to be determined.Future implementation grant proposals from eligible entities will vary depending on selected program parameters. 10.LIDAC Benets/Analysis A new Community Choice Renewable program would be open to eligible Utah communities and eligible participating customers.Many parts of Utah include disadvantaged areas according to the IRA Disadvantaged Communities map. In addition to the general LIDAC benets associated with measures (see the LIDAC Analysis section of this Priority Plan)potential benets unique to this measure include: ●Reduced levels of co-pollutants; ●Increased energy options for Utahns. Potential disbenets include the need for additional education and training to LIDACs about the Community Choice Renewable program;this can be mitigated through allocating funding specically for education/training purposes.For detailed information about UDAQ LIDAC engagement,see the Coordination and Outreach section. Project #2 -Rooftop Solar Residential Incentive Program 1.Project Description: Use CPRG funds to provide a general incentive program for onsite residential solar for qualifying residents in Utah.Potential nancial incentives could include point of sale rebates,ongoing grants,and technical assistance navigating incentives.This program intends to supplement anticipated funds from Solar for All for low-income households. This incentive will help continue to support solar since Utah’s residential Solar PV Tax Credit ended on December 31,2023. For installations completed in 2023,the residential Solar PV tax credit was calculated as 25 percent of the eligible system cost or $400,whichever was less for installations on residential dwelling units. 2.Estimate of GHG and criteria pollutant emissions reductions UDAQ estimated GHG and criteria pollutant emission reductions based on assumptions made for an example program that would incentivize and deploy X units.Actual emissions reductions will vary depending on selected program parameters. GHG and Criteria Emissions Reductions (metric tons) BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 71 of 83 DRAFTNOxSO2PM2.5 VOCs NH3 CO2e By 2030 77.5 42.6 8.3 2.8 2.8 146,093.1 By 2050 387.4 213.1 41.5 13.8 13.8 730,465.4 Quantication tool(s)utilized:AVERT 3.Implementing agency or agencies The program could potentially be administered by UDAQ and/or UOED. 4.Review of authority to implement Under Utah Code 19-1-201,the department [UDEQ]may perform the administrative functions of the boards established by Section 19-1-106,including the acceptance and administration of grants from the federal government and from other sources,public or private,to carry out the board's functions.Also under Utah Code 19-1-202,the [UDEQ] executive director may,with the approval of the governor,participate in the distribution, disbursement,or administration of any fund or service,advanced,offered,or contributed by the federal government for purposes consistent with the powers and duties of the department. Utah Code 19-1-105,creates the Utah Division of Air Quality to administer 19-2,Air Conservation Act.Under Utah Code 19-2-107,the [UDAQ]director may accept,receive,and administer grants or other funds or gifts from public and private agencies,including the federal government,for the purpose of carrying out any of the functions of the Air Conservation Act.Furthermore,UDAQ is eligible to apply for assistance under this solicitation,in accordance with 42 U.S.C.16131 and CFDA 66.039. Under Utah Code 79-6-401,by following the procedures and requirements of Title 63J, Chapter 5,Federal Funds Procedures Act,the office [OED]may seek federal grants or loans, seek to participate in federal programs,and,in accordance with applicable federal program guidelines,administer federally funded state energy programs. Under this authority,OED administers the Utah Renewable Energy Systems Tax Credit program which until recently included residential solar tax credits.7 5.Implementation schedule and milestones Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6.Geographic location Statewide implementation. 7.Funding sources 7 https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title59/Chapter7/59-7-S614.html BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 72 of 83 DRAFTa.Funding needed to implement:$5,750,000 b.Complementary Funding: ●IRA 60103 Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund -Zero-Emission Technologies Grant Program (Solar for All) c.Funding pursued by state or secured for implementation of this project: ●IRA 60103 Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund -Zero-Emission Technologies Grant Program (Solar for All) d.How additional implementation grant dollars are necessary to fund the measure: ■Since Utah’s residential Solar PV Tax Credit ended on December 31,2023, additional funds are needed to incentivize households to pursue residential solar.Even if Utah is awarded Solar for All funds,many households still may not qualify. 8.Metrics for tracking progress For this measure,we use the following metrics to track progress:number of residential solar PV systems deployed,PV system life,and number of performance years for implementation in order to quantify emissions reductions. 9.Quantitative cost estimates UDAQ assumed total deployment of 5,000 units at an incentive level of $1,000/unit,for a total incentive budget of $5,000,000,to which 15%in administrative expenses were added, for a total project budget of $5,750,000.Future implementation grant proposals from eligible entities,including UDAQ,may vary depending on selected project parameters. 10.LIDAC Benets/Analysis A new residential solar incentive program would be open to all Utahns.Funding could be prioritized to moderate-income households,who might not be eligible for the Solar for All program.Many parts of Utah include disadvantaged areas according to the IRA Disadvantaged Communities map. In addition to the general LIDAC benets associated with measures (see the LIDAC Analysis section of this Priority Plan)potential benets unique to this measure include: ●Reduced level of NOx,SO2,PM2.5,VOCs,NH3,shown in this project’s Section 2 table; ●Increased energy options for residents. Potential disbenets include the need for additional education and training about the solar program to Utah residents,including those in LIDACs;this can be mitigated through allocating funding specically for education/training purposes.For detailed information about UDAQ LIDAC engagement,see the Coordination and Outreach section. Natural and Working Lands BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 73 of 83 DRAFTMeasure#10 -Promote Healthy and Resilient Forests This measure intends to voluntarily improve forest management in Utah with the goal of promoting healthy and resilient forests and reducing wildre risk as essential to addressing GHG emissions through collaboration on landscape-scale forest health and fuels reduction projects.Below are examples of project types related to this measure. Project #1 -Supporting Forest Management and Wildfire Mitigation 1.Project Description: Use CPRG funds for projects that support forest management and wildre mitigation.The Utah Division of Forestry,Fire and State Lands (UDFFSL)would be a key partner in ensuring that projects directly align with the Utah Forest Action Plan and other relevant laws and guidelines.Projects could be implemented within state boundaries only or implemented with neighboring Western states. UDAQ is seeking more information on specic projects that support the following goals: ●Promote forest restoration activities on private lands with forest conservation and stewardship practices that include climate benets; ●Engage local communities in planning and implementing Urban &Community Forestry projects focused on climate benets; ●Encourage activities on private forest lands focusing on improving forest health and resilience,reducing the potential for land fragmentation,and addressing wildre risk reduction; ●Support program integration between UDFFSL programs in forestry and hazardous fuels reduction treatments in the common goal of pre-re vegetation management; ●Educate landowners,logging contractors,and others on forest stewardship; ●Support the Utah Forest Legacy Program strategies and objectives. 2.Estimate of GHG and criteria pollutant emissions reductions More information needed. 3.Implementing agency or agencies As envisioned,funding for this program could be secured through the CPRG implementation grant program by UDAQ with the Utah Division of Forestry,Fire,and State Lands (UDFFSL)as a sub-awardee.DFFSL would administer the program and/or work with similar entities in neighboring Western states as part of a coalition.Other eligible entities in Utah could apply for and administer this or a similar program. 4.Review of authority to implement Under Utah Code 19-1-201,the department [UDEQ]may perform the administrative functions of the boards established by Section 19-1-106,including the acceptance and BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 74 of 83 DRAFTadministrationofgrantsfromthefederalgovernmentandfromothersources,public or private,to carry out the board's functions.Also under Utah Code 19-1-202,the [UDEQ] executive director may,with the approval of the governor,participate in the distribution, disbursement,or administration of any fund or service,advanced,offered,or contributed by the federal government for purposes consistent with the powers and duties of the department. Utah Code 19-1-105,creates the Utah Division of Air Quality to administer 19-2,Air Conservation Act.Under Utah Code 19-2-107,the [UDAQ]director may accept,receive,and administer grants or other funds or gifts from public and private agencies,including the federal government,for the purpose of carrying out any of the functions of the Air Conservation Act.Furthermore,UDAQ is eligible to apply for assistance under this solicitation,in accordance with 42 U.S.C.16131 and CFDA 66.039. UDFFSL is established by Utah Code 65A-1-4 and “is the executive authority for the management of sovereign lands,and the state's mineral estates on lands other than school and institutional trust lands,and shall provide for forestry and re control activities as required in Section 65A-8-101.” 5.Implementation schedule and milestones More information needed. 6.Geographic location More information needed. 7.Funding sources a.Funding needed to implement: b.Complementary Funding: ●IIJA 40806 -Fuel Breaks ●IRA 23001 -Develop and Implement Activities and Tactics for Old Growth ●IRA 23003 -Urban and Community Forestry Assistance Program ●IIJA -Forest Health Management on Federal Lands Programs ●IIJA -Joint Chiefs Landscape Restoration Partnership Program ●IIJA -Reforestation Trust Fund ●IIJA -State Fire Assistance ●IIJA -State Forest Action Plans ●IIJA 40803 -Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program ●IIJA 40804 -Recreation Sites ●IRA 60201 -Environmental and Climate Justice Block Grants -Change Grants ●IIJA -Department of Interior Wildre Management ●IIJA -State Fire Assistance BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 75 of 83 DRAFT●IIJA 40101 -Preventing Outages and Enhancing the Resilience of the Electric Grid Formula Grants ●IIJA Division J Title VI -Wildre Management c.Funding pursued by state or secured for implementation of this project: More information needed. d.How additional implementation grant dollars are necessary to fund the measure: More information needed. 8.Metrics for tracking progress More information needed. 9.Quantitative cost estimates More information needed. 10.LIDAC Benets/Analysis In addition to the general LIDAC benets associated with measures (see the LIDAC Analysis section of this Priority Plan)potential benets unique to this measure include: ●Reduced community wildre risk and improved water quality; ●Reduced levels of co-pollutants; ●In areas across the state,this measure could result in more resilient communities through green infrastructure,storm buffers,and storm water mitigation.It could also result in more access to open space and the corresponding positive physical and mental health effects. For detailed information about UDAQ LIDAC engagement,see the Coordination and Outreach section. Cross-Cuing Measure #11 -Energy Outreach,Education,and Workforce This measure intends to increase outreach,education,and workforce-focused efforts related to energy efficiency and zero-emission technology in Utah.Below are specic examples of types of projects for this measure. Project #1 -Energy Demonstration and Assistance Program (One-Stop Shop) 1.Project Description: Use CPRG funds for staffing an Energy Demonstration and Assistance program in Utah. This program could include demonstration facilities and/or staff who would serve as a BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 76 of 83 DRAFTcost-free “one-stop shop,”a trusted resource providing information in various formats about efficiency and clean energy measures (energy efficiency,renewable energy, zero-emission transportation/technology,etc.),nancing options (incentives,vouchers, etc.),and resiliency (for wildre,oods,drought,etc.)for individual residents and entities like small businesses. This program could issue competitive grants to third-party organizations (such as universities,nonprots,etc)who would use their staff to oversee customized work in their communities.Program staff would support outreach and education throughout the state. This could include steps like utilizing sustainable living demonstration “show homes.” Programming could include tours,workshops,one-to-one assistance (over the phone,in person,etc),and annual community programs aimed at lowering the cost of equipment upgrades for all households,and providing heavily subsidized/free options for moderate-income and LIDAC households.The program would support Utah residents and small entities in making the change to net-zero,resilient living on their timeline and budget. Other states/municipalities currently or have previously implemented this type of program.8 This project was identied by one or more stakeholders and/or UDAQ staff.UDAQ is seeking feedback on program design and quantication of costs,emission reductions,and other program parameters. 2.Estimate of GHG and criteria pollutant emissions reductions More information needed. 3.Implementing agency or agencies As envisioned,the program would be administered by UDAQ and/or third parties in Utah through a competitive RFP process.Other eligible entities in Utah could apply for and administer this or a similar program. 4.Review of authority to implement Under Utah Code 19-1-201,the department [UDEQ]may perform the administrative functions of the boards established by Section 19-1-106,including the acceptance and administration of grants from the federal government and from other sources,public or private,to carry out the board's functions.Also under Utah Code 19-1-202,the [UDEQ] executive director may,with the approval of the governor,participate in the distribution, disbursement,or administration of any fund or service,advanced,offered,or contributed 8 Examples include the I Heart My Home CT program and a City of Ann Arbor pilot program. BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 77 of 83 DRAFTbythefederalgovernmentforpurposesconsistentwiththepowersanddutiesofthe department. Utah Code 19-1-105,creates the Utah Division of Air Quality to administer 19-2,Air Conservation Act.Under Utah Code 19-2-107,the [UDAQ]director may accept,receive,and administer grants or other funds or gifts from public and private agencies,including the federal government,for the purpose of carrying out any of the functions of the Air Conservation Act.Furthermore,UDAQ is eligible to apply for assistance under this solicitation,in accordance with 42 U.S.C.16131 and CFDA 66.039. 5.Implementation schedule and milestones More information needed. 6.Geographic location Statewide implementation. 7.Funding sources a.Funding needed to implement:Approximately $3,000,000 b.Complementary Funding: ●IIJA 41007 -Wind Energy Technology Program ●IRA 60107 -Low Emissions Electricity Program ●IIJA -Solar Improvement Research and Development ●IIJA -Technology and Innovation Deployment Program ●IRA 60201 -Environmental and Climate Justice Block Grants -Change Grants c.Funding pursued by state or secured for implementation of this project: ■More information needed. d.How additional implementation grant dollars are necessary to fund the measure: ■More information needed. 8.Metrics for tracking progress For this measure,we use the following metrics to track progress:number of individuals and entities receiving assistance,vehicle or piece of technology life,and number of performance years for implementation in order to quantify emissions reductions. 9.Quantitative cost estimates Based on stakeholder input,UDAQ assumed staffing /programming costs for a total project budget of approximately $3,000,000.Future implementation grant proposals from eligible entities,including UDAQ,may vary depending on selected project parameters. 10.LIDAC Benets/Analysis BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 78 of 83 DRAFTManyifnotalloftheemissionreductionstrategiesfocusedonenergyefficiencyand zero-emission technology will not be fully realized without trusted staff that engage in outreach and education directly with community members and small entities to implement programs and projects.Multiple LIDAC stakeholders expressed support for an Energy Assistance-type program. By enabling greater adoption of the other strategies,this program catalyzes the general benets associated with other projects (see the LIDAC Analysis section of this Priority Plan). For detailed information about UDAQ LIDAC engagement,see the Coordination and Outreach section of this Priority Plan. Project #2 -Workforce Training 1.Project Description: Many if not all of the emission reduction strategies focused on energy efficiency,zero- emission technology,and more will not be fully realized without a Utah workforce that is trained with the skills needed to implement the programs and projects.UDAQ could work with stakeholders like industry,other state agencies,state universities,colleges and technical colleges,businesses,nonprots,and others to help identify funding to support workforce training and development for lower-carbon industries.Emissions reduction strategies can be job creators,with opportunities in elds like electricians,HVAC work, construction,auto maintenance,forestry,water conservation,and others that can offer career opportunities and may not require a 4-year college degree. This project was identied by one or more stakeholders and/or UDAQ staff.UDAQ is seeking feedback on program design and quantication of costs,emission reductions,and other program parameters. Measure #12 -Carbon Sequestration and Storage This measure intends to leverage CPRG funds to develop Carbon Sequestration and Storage (CSS)resources including a CSS resource survey,or a Utah specic characterization,of potential CCS storage resources available within the state. Additionally,this measure intends to leverage available funding for potential CSS projects that utilize these resources. Project #1 -Utah Carbon Sequestration and Storage Survey 1.Project Description: BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 79 of 83 DRAFTThisprojectwouldcharacterizepotentialCSSstorageresourcesforthelongtermstorage and sequestration of CO2 within the Basin and Range formation located in Milford,Beaver and Iron counties.With the resources identied through the survey,this project aims to capture and store CO2 emissions from a Direct Reduced Iron (DRI)processing facility that is currently under construction,as well as the CO2 emissions captured as part of the Red Rock Direct Air Capture (DAC)hub,both of which are located in the survey region. The University of Utah Energy and Geoscience Institute (EGI)has identied the need for the cataloging of potential CSS resources within the state of Utah and has further identied several,either ongoing or under construction,sources of CO2 that could benet from the utilization of such resources.Therefore the program represents the development of new,scalable,CSS resources that could result in the direct capture and reduction of emissions from ongoing projects. Funds received from CPRG would be utilized to develop site assessments,characterization, and permitting of Class VI injection wells and necessary monitoring wells to ensure success of the CSS project.Funds would also be utilized to assist in the cost assessment, permitting and construction of the infrastructure necessary to pipe captured CO2 emissions from the facilities to the sequestration storage site. This project was identied by one or more stakeholders and/or UDAQ staff.UDAQ is seeking feedback on program design and quantication of costs,emission reductions,and other program parameters. 2.Estimate of GHG and criteria pollutant emissions reductions The stakeholder estimated GHG emission reductions based on assumptions made for an example program that would incentivize and deploy carbon capture from two facilities within the survey region.The stakeholder estimates an annual sequestration of 800,000 metric tons of CO2 per year once operational.Actual emissions reductions will vary depending on selected program parameters and the start date of operations,the accumulated 2030 and 2050 emissions identied in the table below assuming the beginning of CSS operations from both facilities in the calendar year of 2028. GHG and Criteria Emissions Reductions (metric tons) NOx SO2 PM2.5 VOCs NH3 CO2e By 2030 2,400,000 By 2050 18,400,000 EGI estimates of total indirect emission reduction potential;project is for characterization of storage 3.Implementing agency or agencies BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 80 of 83 DRAFTEGIhasproposedthisproject,and therefore the University of Utah in collaboration with EGI would be the implementing agency,with the UDEQ providing assistance where appropriate. 4.Review of authority to implement Under Utah Code 19-1-201,the department [UDEQ]may perform the administrative functions of the boards established by Section 19-1-106,including the acceptance and administration of grants from the federal government and from other sources,public or private,to carry out the board's functions.Also under Utah Code 19-1-202,the [UDEQ] executive director may,with the approval of the governor,participate in the distribution, disbursement,or administration of any fund or service,advanced,offered,or contributed by the federal government for purposes consistent with the powers and duties of the department. Utah Code 19-1-105,creates the Utah Division of Air Quality to administer 19-2,Air Conservation Act.Under Utah Code 19-2-107,the [UDAQ]director may accept,receive,and administer grants or other funds or gifts from public and private agencies,including the federal government,for the purpose of carrying out any of the functions of the Air Conservation Act.Furthermore,UDAQ is eligible to apply for assistance under this solicitation,in accordance with 42 U.S.C.16131 and CFDA 66.039. Under Utah Code 53B-7-103,the board [Utah Board of Higher Education]is the designated state educational agency authorized to negotiate and contract with the federal government and to accept nancial or other assistance from the federal government or any of its agencies in the name of and in behalf of the state of Utah,under terms and conditions as may be prescribed by congressional enactment designed to further higher education. Subject to policies and procedures established by the board,an institution of higher education and the institution of higher education's employees may apply for and receive grants or research and development contracts within the educational role of the recipient institution.A program [as described above]may be conducted by and through the institution,or by and through any foundation or organization that is established for the purpose of assisting the institution in the accomplishment of the institution's purposes. An institution or the institution's foundation or organization engaged in a program authorized by the board may enter into contracts with federal,state,or local governments or their subsidiary agencies or departments,with private organizations,companies,rms, or industries,or with individuals for conducting the authorized programs.One may also accept contributions,grants,or gifts from,and enter into contracts and cooperative agreements with,any private organization,company,rm,industry,or individual,or any governmental agency or department ,for support of authorized programs within the BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 81 of 83 DRAFTeducationalroleoftherecipientinstitution,and may agree to provide matching funds with respect to those programs from resources available to the institution. 5.Implementation schedule and milestones The project has three distinct phases with specic deliverables: Deliverable #1:CSS survey of the proposed region. Deliverable #2:Construction of necessary infrastructure for CSS operations. Deliverable #3:Start of CSS operations. Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 CSS Survey More information needed. More information needed. More information needed. More information needed. 6.Geographic location The three counties to be included in the initial CSS survey,Milford,Beaver,and Iron counties,are located in central western rural Utah.Therefore,the three deliverables that are part of the proposed project would be deployed and developed within these rural counties. 7.Funding sources Funds necessary to supplement the implementation of the CSS resources survey would be $2.25 million,representing 20%of the total necessary funding.Funds necessary from CPRG to implement the remaining deliverables,including the construction of necessary infrastructure,would be an additional $9.0 million,resulting in a total of $11.25 million. a.Complementary Funding: ●IIJA 40209 -Advanced Energy Manufacturing and Recycling Grants ●IIJA 40303 -Front-End Engineering and Design Program Out Activities Under Carbon Capture Tech Program 962 of EPA (Sec 40303) ●IIJA 40342 -Clean Energy Demonstration on Current and Former Mine Land ●IIJA 41004 -Carbon Capture Demonstration Projects Program ●IIJA 41004 -Carbon Capture Large-Scale Pilot Programs ●IRA 13104 -Extension and Modication of Credit for Carbon Oxide Sequestration (45Q) ●IIJA 41005 b -Commercial Direct Air Capture Hub Technology Prize Competition (41005,b) b.Funding pursued by state or secured for implementation of this project: ●More information needed. c.How additional implementation grant dollars are necessary to fund the measure: ●More information needed. BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 82 of 83 DRAFT8.Metrics for tracking progress For this project,the following metrics to track progress could be utilized:number of sources utilizing the CSS resources,lifetime of CSS infrastructure,and number of performance years for implementation in order to quantify emissions reductions. 9.Quantitative cost estimates The stakeholder reported a need for a total budget of $11.25 million,of which $2.25 million would be utilized to assist in the development of the CSS survey,and the remaining $9.0 million used to help develop the infrastructure needed for CSS operations at the two participating facilities. 10.LIDAC Benets/Analysis More information needed. BEEHIVE EMISSION REDUCTION PLAN •PRIORITY PLAN 83 of 83