DAQ-2024-004688

DAQE-AN105100011-24

{{$d1 }}

Lynn Grundvig
Deluxe Manufacturing Operations
5820 West Harold Gatty Drive
Salt Lake City, UT 84116
[e-mail]

Dear Mr. Grundvig:

Re: Approval Order: New Deluxe Manufacturing Operations Printing Facility
Project Number: N105100011

The attached Approval Order (AO) is issued pursuant to the Notice of Intent (NOI) received on June 26,
2023. Deluxe Manufacturing Operations must comply with the requirements of this AO, all applicable
state requirements (R307), and Federal Standards.

The project engineer for this action is Mr. Enqiang He, who can be contacted at [phone] or
[e-mail]. Future correspondence on this AO should include the engineer's name as well as the
DAQE number shown on the upper right-hand corner of this letter. No public comments were received
on this action.

Sincerely,

{{$s }}

Bryce C. Bird
Director

BCB:EH:jg

cc: Salt Lake County Health Department

195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144820 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone] • T.D.D. [phone]
www.deq.utah.gov
Printed on 100% recycled paper
State of Utah

SPENCER J. COX
Governor

DEIDRE HENDERSON
Lieutenant Governor

Department of
Environmental Quality

Kimberly D. Shelley
Executive Director

DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
Bryce C. Bird
Director

January 24, 2024

STATE OF UTAH
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality

{{#s=Sig_es_:signer1:signature}}
{{#d1=date1_es_:signer1:date:format(date, "mmmm d, yyyy")}}
{{#d2=date1_es_:signer1:date:format(date, "mmmm d, yyyy"):align(center)}}

APPROVAL ORDER
DAQE-AN105100011-24
New Deluxe Manufacturing Operations Printing Facility

Prepared By
Mr. Enqiang He, Engineer
[phone]
[e-mail]

Issued to
Deluxe Manufacturing Operations - Coldset Printing Presses & Stamping

Issued On
{{$d2 }}

Issued By

{{$s }}

Bryce C. Bird
Director
Division of Air Quality

January 24, 2024
TABLE OF CONTENTS

TITLE/SIGNATURE PAGE ....................................................................................................... 1
GENERAL INFORMATION ...................................................................................................... 3
CONTACT/LOCATION INFORMATION ............................................................................... 3
SOURCE INFORMATION ........................................................................................................ 3
General Description ................................................................................................................ 3
NSR Classification .................................................................................................................. 3
Source Classification .............................................................................................................. 3
Applicable Federal Standards ................................................................................................. 3
Project Description.................................................................................................................. 3
SUMMARY OF EMISSIONS .................................................................................................... 4
SECTION I: GENERAL PROVISIONS .................................................................................... 4
SECTION II: PERMITTED EQUIPMENT .............................................................................. 5
SECTION II: SPECIAL PROVISIONS ..................................................................................... 6
PERMIT HISTORY ..................................................................................................................... 7
ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................. 8

DAQE-AN105100011-24
Page 3

GENERAL INFORMATION

CONTACT/LOCATION INFORMATION

Owner Name Source Name
Deluxe Manufacturing Operations Deluxe Manufacturing Operations - Coldset
Printing Presses & Stamping

Mailing Address Physical Address
5820 West Harold Gatty Drive 5820 West Harold Gatty Drive
Salt Lake City, UT 84116 Salt Lake City, UT 84116

Source Contact UTM Coordinates
Name: Lynn Grundvig 412,890 m Easting
Phone: [phone],515,000 m Northing
Email: [e-mail] Datum NAD83
UTM Zone 12

SIC code 2761 (Manifold Business Forms)

SOURCE INFORMATION
General Description
Deluxe Manufacturing Operations (Deluxe) operates a check printing facility in Salt Lake City. All the
printing processes use the offset lithography technique. Deluxe also operates natural gas combustion
equipment. VOC emissions from the printing operations are limited to 20.42 tpy.

NSR Classification
New Minor Source

Source Classification
Located in Northern Wasatch Front O3 NAA, Salt Lake City UT PM2.5 NAA, Salt Lake County SO2
NAA
Salt Lake County
Airs Source Size: B

Applicable Federal Standards
None
Project Description
Deluxe requested an AO to conduct printing operations. The operations include various printing presses,
natural gas-fired boilers, machine cleaners, and support equipment.

DAQE-AN105100011-24
Page 4

SUMMARY OF EMISSIONS

The emissions listed below are an estimate of the total potential emissions from the source. Some
rounding of emissions is possible.

Criteria Pollutant Change (TPY) Total (TPY)
CO2 Equivalent 317.00
Carbon Monoxide 0.22
Nitrogen Oxides 0.13
Particulate Matter - PM10 0.02
Particulate Matter - PM2.5 0.02
Sulfur Dioxide 0.00
Volatile Organic Compounds 20.43

SECTION I: GENERAL PROVISIONS

I.1 All definitions, terms, abbreviations, and references used in this AO conform to those used in
the UAC R307 and 40 CFR. Unless noted otherwise, references cited in these AO conditions
refer to those rules. [R307-101]

I.2 The limits set forth in this AO shall not be exceeded without prior approval. [R307-401]

I.3 Modifications to the equipment or processes approved by this AO that could affect the
emissions covered by this AO must be reviewed and approved. [R307-401-1]

I.4 All records referenced in this AO or in other applicable rules, which are required to be kept by
the owner/operator, shall be made available to the Director or Director's representative upon
request, and the records shall include the two-year period prior to the date of the request.
Unless otherwise specified in this AO or in other applicable state and federal rules, records
shall be kept for a minimum of two (2) years. [R307-401-8]

I.5 At all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, owners and operators
shall, to the extent practicable, maintain and operate any equipment approved under this AO,
including associated air pollution control equipment, in a manner consistent with good air
pollution control practice for minimizing emissions. Determination of whether acceptable
operating and maintenance procedures are being used will be based on information available to
the Director which may include, but is not limited to, monitoring results, opacity observations,
review of operating and maintenance procedures, and inspection of the source. All
maintenance performed on equipment authorized by this AO shall be recorded. [R307-401-4]

I.6 The owner/operator shall comply with UAC R307-107. General Requirements: Breakdowns.
[R307-107]

I.7 The owner/operator shall comply with UAC R307-150 Series. Emission Inventories.
[R307-150]

I.8 The owner/operator shall submit documentation of the status of construction or modification to
the Director within 18 months from the date of this AO. This AO may become invalid if
construction is not commenced within 18 months from the date of this AO or if construction is
discontinued for 18 months or more. To ensure proper credit when notifying the Director, send
the documentation to the Director, attn.: NSR Section. [R307-401-18]

DAQE-AN105100011-24
Page 5

SECTION II: PERMITTED EQUIPMENT

II.A THE APPROVED EQUIPMENT

II.A.1 Deluxe Manufacturing Operations
Printing operations

II.A.2 Digital Offset Press
Two (2) HP 100K digital offset presses

II.A.3 Digital Press
One (1) HP 7900 digital press

II.A.4 Printing Press
One (1) HP T250 thermal inkjet printing press

II.A.5 Printing Presses
Five (5) two-color Heidelberg GTO 52 presses

II.A.6 Printing Presses
Nineteen (19) DCOP presses

II.A.7 Printing Presses
One (1) Heidelberg 6-color speedmaster printing press

II.A.8 Printing Presses
Two (2) Ryobi presses

II.A.9 Printing Presses
Three (3) Halm jet presses

II.A.10 Machine Cleaners/Oilers
Three (3) numbering machine cleaners/oilers

II.A.11 Printing Press
One (1) six-color Didde press

II.A.12 Printing Press
One (1) four-color Didde press

II.A.13 Printing Press
One (1) four-color Heidelberg GTO 52 press

II.A.14 Printing Press
One (1) two-color super jet press

II.A.15 Support Equipment
One (1) folder

II.A.16 Support Equipment
One (1) collator

DAQE-AN105100011-24
Page 6

II.A.17 Support Equipment
One (1) Kodak plate maker

II.A.18 Various Boilers
Rating: < 5 MMBtu/hr each
Fuel: Natural gas
(Exempt equipment; for information only)

II.A.19 Finishing Area
One (1) finishing operation area

II.A.20 UV Curing Units
Six (6) electrical UV curing units (for information only)

SECTION II: SPECIAL PROVISIONS

II.B REQUIREMENTS AND LIMITATIONS

II.B.1 Site-Wide Requirements and Limitations
II.B.1.a The owner/operator shall not allow visible emissions from any emission point to exceed 20%
opacity. [R307-401-8]

II.B.1.a.1 Opacity observations of emissions from stationary sources shall be conducted according to 40
CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 9. [R307-401-8]

II.B.2 VOC and HAP Limitations
II.B.2.a The owner/operator shall not emit more than 20.42 tons of VOCs per rolling 12-month period
from the printer presses, cleaning solvents, and associated operations. [R307-401-8]

II.B.2.a.1 The owner/operator shall calculate a new 12-month total by the 20th day of each month using
data from the previous 12 months. The owner/operator shall use a mass-balance method to
calculate emissions from evaporative sources. The owner/operator may use the following
equations with applicable units to comply with the mass-balance method:

VOCs = [% VOCs by Weight/100] x [Density] x [Volume Consumed]

[R307-401-8]

II.B.2.a.2 The owner/operator shall use a mass-balance method to quantify any amount of VOCs reclaimed.
The owner/operator shall subtract the amount of VOCs reclaimed from the quantities calculated
above to provide the monthly total VOC emissions. [R307-401-8]

DAQE-AN105100011-24
Page 7

II.B.2.a.3 The owner/operator shall keep records each month of the following:

A. The name (as per SDS) of the VOC-emitting material

B. The maximum percent by weight of VOCs in each material used

C. The density of each material used

D. The volume of each VOC-emitting material used

E. The amount of VOCs emitted from each material

F. The amount of VOCs reclaimed and/or controlled from
each material

G. The total amount of VOCs emitted from all materials (in tons).

[R307-401-8]

II.B.2.b The owner/operator shall not use any material containing HAPs in inks, fountain solution, and
cleaning solvents. [R307-401-8]

II.B.2.c The owner/operator shall comply with the applicable requirements in UAC R307-325, Ozone
Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas: General Requirements, and R307-351, Graphic Arts.
[R307-325, R307-351]

PERMIT HISTORY

This Approval Order shall supersede (if a modification) or will be based on the following documents:

Is Derived From NOI dated June 26, 2023
Incorporates Additional information dated July 12, 2023
Incorporates Additional information dated October 16, 2023
Incorporates Additional information dated December 5, 2023

DAQE-AN105100011-24
Page 8

ACRONYMS

The following lists commonly used acronyms and associated translations as they apply to this document:

40 CFR Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations
AO Approval Order
BACT Best Available Control Technology
CAA Clean Air Act
CAAA Clean Air Act Amendments
CDS Classification Data System (used by Environmental Protection Agency to classify
sources by size/type)
CEM Continuous emissions monitor
CEMS Continuous emissions monitoring system
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CMS Continuous monitoring system
CO Carbon monoxide
CO2 Carbon Dioxide
CO2e Carbon Dioxide Equivalent - Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 98,
Subpart A, Table A-1
COM Continuous opacity monitor
DAQ/UDAQ Division of Air Quality
DAQE This is a document tracking code for internal Division of Air Quality use
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
FDCP Fugitive dust control plan
GHG Greenhouse Gas(es) - Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations 52.21 (b)(49)(i)
GWP Global Warming Potential - Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 86.1818-
12(a)
HAP or HAPs Hazardous air pollutant(s)
ITA Intent to Approve
LB/YR Pounds per year
MACT Maximum Achievable Control Technology
MMBTU Million British Thermal Units
NAA Nonattainment Area
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NESHAP National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
NOI Notice of Intent
NOx Oxides of nitrogen
NSPS New Source Performance Standard
NSR New Source Review
PM10 Particulate matter less than 10 microns in size
PM2.5 Particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size
PSD Prevention of Significant Deterioration
PTE Potential to Emit
R307 Rules Series 307
R307-401 Rules Series 307 - Section 401
SO2 Sulfur dioxide
Title IV Title IV of the Clean Air Act
Title V Title V of the Clean Air Act
TPY Tons per year
UAC Utah Administrative Code
VOC Volatile organic compounds

DAQE-IN105100011-23

December 14, 2023

Lynn Grundvig
Deluxe Manufacturing Operations
5820 West Harold Gatty Drive
Salt Lake City, UT 84116
[e-mail]

Dear Mr. Grundvig:

Re: Intent to Approve: New Deluxe Manufacturing Operations Printing Facility
Project Number: N105100011

The attached document is the Intent to Approve (ITA) for the above-referenced project. The ITA is
subject to public review. Any comments received shall be considered before an Approval Order (AO) is
issued. The Division of Air Quality is authorized to charge a fee for reimbursement of the actual costs
incurred in the issuance of an AO. An invoice will follow upon issuance of the final AO.

Future correspondence on this ITA should include the engineer's name, Mr. Enqiang He, as well as the
DAQE number as shown on the upper right-hand corner of this letter. Mr. Enqiang He, can be reached at
[phone] or [e-mail], if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

{{$s }}

Alan D. Humpherys, Manager
New Source Review Section

ADH:EH:jg

cc: Salt Lake County Health Department

195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144820 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone] • T.D.D. [phone]
www.deq.utah.gov
Printed on 100% recycled paper
State of Utah

SPENCER J. COX
Governor

DEIDRE HENDERSON
Lieutenant Governor

Department of
Environmental Quality

Kimberly D. Shelley
Executive Director

DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
Bryce C. Bird
Director

STATE OF UTAH
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality

INTENT TO APPROVE
DAQE-IN105100011-23
New Deluxe Manufacturing Operations Printing Facility

Prepared By
Mr. Enqiang He, Engineer
[phone]
[e-mail]

Issued to
Deluxe Manufacturing Operations - Coldset Printing Presses & Stamping

Issued On
December 14, 2023

{{$s }}

New Source Review Section Manager
Alan D. Humpherys
{{#s=Sig_es_:signer1:signature}}

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TITLE/SIGNATURE PAGE ....................................................................................................... 1
GENERAL INFORMATION ...................................................................................................... 3
CONTACT/LOCATION INFORMATION ............................................................................... 3
SOURCE INFORMATION ........................................................................................................ 3
General Description ................................................................................................................ 3
NSR Classification .................................................................................................................. 3
Source Classification .............................................................................................................. 3
Applicable Federal Standards ................................................................................................. 3
Project Description.................................................................................................................. 3
SUMMARY OF EMISSIONS .................................................................................................... 4
PUBLIC NOTICE STATEMENT............................................................................................... 4
SECTION I: GENERAL PROVISIONS .................................................................................... 4
SECTION II: PERMITTED EQUIPMENT .............................................................................. 5
SECTION II: SPECIAL PROVISIONS ..................................................................................... 6
PERMIT HISTORY ..................................................................................................................... 7
ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................. 8

DAQE-IN105100011-23
Page 3

GENERAL INFORMATION

CONTACT/LOCATION INFORMATION

Owner Name Source Name
Deluxe Manufacturing Operations Deluxe Manufacturing Operations - Coldset
Printing Presses & Stamping

Mailing Address Physical Address
5820 West Harold Gatty Drive 5820 West Harold Gatty Drive
Salt Lake City, UT 84116 Salt Lake City, UT 84116

Source Contact UTM Coordinates
Name Lynn Grundvig 412,890 m Easting
Phone [phone],515,000 m Northing
Email [e-mail] Datum NAD83
UTM Zone 12

SIC code 2761 (Manifold Business Forms)

SOURCE INFORMATION
General Description
Deluxe Manufacturing Operations (Deluxe) operates a check printing facility in Salt Lake City. All the
printing processes use the offset lithography technique. Deluxe also operates natural gas combustion
equipment. VOC emissions from the printing operations are limited to 20.42 tpy.
NSR Classification
New Minor Source

Source Classification
Located in Northern Wasatch Front O3 NAA, Salt Lake City UT PM2.5 NAA, Salt Lake County SO2
NAA
Salt Lake County
Airs Source Size: B

Applicable Federal Standards
None
Project Description
Deluxe has requested an AO to conduct printing operations. The operations include various printing
presses, natural gas-fired boilers, machine cleaners, and support equipment.

DAQE-IN105100011-23
Page 4

SUMMARY OF EMISSIONS

The emissions listed below are an estimate of the total potential emissions from the source. Some
rounding of emissions is possible.

Criteria Pollutant Change (TPY) Total (TPY)
CO2 Equivalent 317.00
Carbon Monoxide 0.22
Nitrogen Oxides 0.13
Particulate Matter - PM10 0.02
Particulate Matter - PM2.5 0.02
Sulfur Dioxide 0.00
Volatile Organic Compounds 20.43

PUBLIC NOTICE STATEMENT

The NOI for the above-referenced project has been evaluated and has been found to be consistent with the
requirements of UAC R307. Air pollution producing sources and/or their air control facilities may not be
constructed, installed, established, or modified prior to the issuance of an AO by the Director.

A 30-day public comment period will be held in accordance with UAC R307-401-7. A notification of the
intent to approve will be published in the Salt Lake Tribune and Deseret News on December 17, 2023.
During the public comment period the proposal and the evaluation of its impact on air quality will be
available for the public to review and provide comment. If anyone so requests a public hearing within 15
days of publication, it will be held in accordance with UAC R307-401-7. The hearing will be held as
close as practicable to the location of the source. Any comments received during the public comment
period and the hearing will be evaluated. The proposed conditions of the AO may be changed as a result
of the comments received.

SECTION I: GENERAL PROVISIONS

The intent is to issue an air quality AO authorizing the project with the following recommended
conditions and that failure to comply with any of the conditions may constitute a violation of the AO.

I.1 All definitions, terms, abbreviations, and references used in this AO conform to those used in
the UAC R307 and 40 CFR. Unless noted otherwise, references cited in these AO conditions
refer to those rules. [R307-101]

I.2 The limits set forth in this AO shall not be exceeded without prior approval. [R307-401]

I.3 Modifications to the equipment or processes approved by this AO that could affect the
emissions covered by this AO must be reviewed and approved. [R307-401-1]

I.4 All records referenced in this AO or in other applicable rules, which are required to be kept by
the owner/operator, shall be made available to the Director or Director's representative upon
request, and the records shall include the two-year period prior to the date of the request.
Unless otherwise specified in this AO or in other applicable state and federal rules, records
shall be kept for a minimum of two (2) years. [R307-401-8]

DAQE-IN105100011-23
Page 5

I.5 At all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, owners and operators
shall, to the extent practicable, maintain and operate any equipment approved under this AO,
including associated air pollution control equipment, in a manner consistent with good air
pollution control practice for minimizing emissions. Determination of whether acceptable
operating and maintenance procedures are being used will be based on information available to
the Director which may include, but is not limited to, monitoring results, opacity observations,
review of operating and maintenance procedures, and inspection of the source. All
maintenance performed on equipment authorized by this AO shall be recorded. [R307-401-4]

I.6 The owner/operator shall comply with UAC R307-107. General Requirements: Breakdowns.
[R307-107]

I.7 The owner/operator shall comply with UAC R307-150 Series. Emission Inventories.
[R307-150]

I.8 The owner/operator shall submit documentation of the status of construction or modification to
the Director within 18 months from the date of this AO. This AO may become invalid if
construction is not commenced within 18 months from the date of this AO or if construction is
discontinued for 18 months or more. To ensure proper credit when notifying the Director, send
the documentation to the Director, attn.: NSR Section. [R307-401-18]

SECTION II: PERMITTED EQUIPMENT

The intent is to issue an air quality AO authorizing the project with the following recommended
conditions and that failure to comply with any of the conditions may constitute a violation of the AO.

II.A THE APPROVED EQUIPMENT

II.A.1 Deluxe Manufacturing Operations
Printing operations

II.A.2 Digital Offset Press
Two (2) HP 100K digital offset presses

II.A.3 Digital Press
One (1) HP 7900 digital press

II.A.4 Printing Press
One (1) HP T250 thermal inkjet printing press

II.A.5 Printing Presses
Five (5) two-color Heidelberg GTO 52 presses

II.A.6 Printing Presses
Nineteen (19) DCOP presses

II.A.7 Printing Presses
One (1) Heidelberg 6-color speedmaster printing press

II.A.8 Printing Presses
Two (2) Ryobi presses

DAQE-IN105100011-23
Page 6

II.A.9 Printing Presses
Three (3) Halm jet presses

II.A.10 Machine Cleaners/Oilers
Three (3) numbering machine cleaners/oilers

II.A.11 Printing Press
One (1) six-color Didde press

II.A.12 Printing Press
One (1) four-color Didde press

II.A.13 Printing Press
One (1) four-color Heidelberg GTO 52 press

II.A.14 Printing Press
One (1) two-color super jet press

II.A.15 Support Equipment
One (1) folder

II.A.16 Support Equipment
One (1) collator

II.A.17 Support Equipment
One (1) Kodak plate maker

II.A.18 Various Boilers
Rating: < 5 MMBtu/hr each
Fuel: Natural gas
(Exempt equipment; for information only)

II.A.19 Finishing Area
One (1) finishing operation area

II.A.20 UV Curing Units
Six (6) electrical UV curing units (for information only)

SECTION II: SPECIAL PROVISIONS

The intent is to issue an air quality AO authorizing the project with the following recommended
conditions and that failure to comply with any of the conditions may constitute a violation of the AO.

II.B REQUIREMENTS AND LIMITATIONS

II.B.1 Site-Wide Requirements and Limitations
II.B.1.a The owner/operator shall not allow visible emissions from any emission point to exceed 20%
opacity. [R307-401-8]

II.B.1.a.1 Opacity observations of emissions from stationary sources shall be conducted according to 40
CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 9. [R307-401-8]

DAQE-IN105100011-23
Page 7

II.B.2 VOC and HAP Limitations
II.B.2.a The owner/operator shall not emit more than 20.42 tons of VOCs per rolling 12-month period
from the printer presses, cleaning solvents, and associated operations. [R307-401-8]

II.B.2.a.1 The owner/operator shall calculate a new 12-month total by the 20th day of each month using
data from the previous 12 months. The owner/operator shall use a mass-balance method to
calculate emissions from evaporative sources. The owner/operator may use the following
equations with applicable units to comply with the mass-balance method:

VOCs = [% VOCs by Weight/100] x [Density] x [Volume Consumed]

[R307-401-8]

II.B.2.a.2 The owner/operator shall use a mass-balance method to quantify any amount of VOCs reclaimed.
The owner/operator shall subtract the amount of VOCs reclaimed from the quantities calculated
above to provide the monthly total VOC emissions. [R307-401-8]

II.B.2.a.3 The owner/operator shall keep records each month of the following:

A. The name (as per SDS) of the VOC-emitting material

B. The maximum percent by weight of VOCs in each material used

C. The density of each material used

D. The volume of each VOC-emitting material used

E. The amount of VOCs emitted from each material

F. The amount of VOCs reclaimed and/or controlled from each material

G. The total amount of VOCs emitted from all materials (in tons).

[R307-401-8]

II.B.2.b The owner/operator shall not use any material containing HAPs in inks, fountain solution, and
cleaning solvents. [R307-401-8]

II.B.2.c The owner/operator shall comply with the applicable requirements in UAC R307-325, Ozone
Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas: General Requirements, and R307-351, Graphic Arts.
[R307-325, R307-351]

PERMIT HISTORY

This Approval Order shall supersede (if a modification) or will be based on the following documents:

Is Derived From NOI dated June 26, 2023
Incorporates Additional information dated July 12, 2023
Incorporates Additional information dated October 16, 2023
Incorporates Additional information dated December 5, 2023

DAQE-IN105100011-23
Page 8

ACRONYMS

The following lists commonly used acronyms and associated translations as they apply to this document:

40 CFR Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations
AO Approval Order
BACT Best Available Control Technology
CAA Clean Air Act
CAAA Clean Air Act Amendments
CDS Classification Data System (used by Environmental Protection Agency to classify
sources by size/type)
CEM Continuous emissions monitor
CEMS Continuous emissions monitoring system
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CMS Continuous monitoring system
CO Carbon monoxide
CO2 Carbon Dioxide
CO2e Carbon Dioxide Equivalent - Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 98,
Subpart A, Table A-1
COM Continuous opacity monitor
DAQ/UDAQ Division of Air Quality
DAQE This is a document tracking code for internal Division of Air Quality use
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
FDCP Fugitive dust control plan
GHG Greenhouse Gas(es) - Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations 52.21 (b)(49)(i)
GWP Global Warming Potential - Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 86.1818-
12(a)
HAP or HAPs Hazardous air pollutant(s)
ITA Intent to Approve
LB/YR Pounds per year
MACT Maximum Achievable Control Technology
MMBTU Million British Thermal Units
NAA Nonattainment Area
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NESHAP National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
NOI Notice of Intent
NOx Oxides of nitrogen
NSPS New Source Performance Standard
NSR New Source Review
PM10 Particulate matter less than 10 microns in size
PM2.5 Particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size
PSD Prevention of Significant Deterioration
PTE Potential to Emit
R307 Rules Series 307
R307-401 Rules Series 307 - Section 401
SO2 Sulfur dioxide
Title IV Title IV of the Clean Air Act
Title V Title V of the Clean Air Act
TPY Tons per year
UAC Utah Administrative Code
VOC Volatile organic compounds

12/14/23, 8:19 AM State of Utah Mail - Legal Notice to be published December 17, 2023
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=b4fd0e1085&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-9220651698261362782&simpl=msg-a:r25958039126008…1/1
Jeree Greenwood <[e-mail]>
Legal Notice to be published December 17, 2023
2 messages
Jeree Greenwood <[e-mail]>Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 8:00 AM
To: "Salt Lake Tribune LaRee Whitmar - [e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
Please publish the following notice on December 17, 2023.
If you can, please reply to this email for my confirmation records.
Jeree
--
Jeree Greenwood
Office Technician II | Minor NSR Section
M: [phone]
airquality.utah.gov
DAQE-NN105100011-23.pdf
334K
Rylie Stegman <[e-mail]>Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 8:17 AM
To: Jeree Greenwood <[e-mail]>
Good morning! You are all set with ad number SLT0025493!
[Quoted text hidden]
--
Rylie Stegman (She/Her)
Advertising Account Executive
M: [phone]
90 S. 400 W. SLC, UT. 84101 STE. 600
Support The Tribune | Subscribe Today!

DAQE-NN105100011-23

December 14, 2023

Salt Lake Tribune and Deseret News
Legal Advertising Dept.
P.O. Box 704055
West Valley City, UT 84170
Acct #9001399880

RE: Legal Notice of Intent to Approve

This letter will confirm the authorization to publish the attached NOTICE in the Salt Lake Tribune and
Deseret News on December 17, 2023.

Please mail the invoice and affidavit of publication to the Utah State Department of Environmental
Quality, Division of Air Quality, P.O. Box 144820, Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4820. If you have any
questions, contact Jeree Greenwood, who may be reached at [phone].

Sincerely,

{{$s }}

Jeree Greenwood
Office Technician

Enclosure

cc: Salt Lake County
cc: Wasatch Front Regional Council

195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144820 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone] • T.D.D. [phone]
www.deq.utah.gov
Printed on 100% recycled paper
State of Utah

SPENCER J. COX
Governor

DEIDRE HENDERSON
Lieutenant Governor

Department of
Environmental Quality

Kimberly D. Shelley
Executive Director

DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
Bryce C. Bird
Director

DAQE-NN105100011-23
Page 2
NOTICE

A Notice of Intent for the following project submitted in accordance with R307-401-1, Utah
Administrative Code (UAC), has been received for consideration by the Director:

Company Name: Deluxe Manufacturing Operations
Location: Deluxe Manufacturing Operations- Coldset Printing Presses & Stamping – 5820
West Harold Gatty Drive, Salt Lake City, UT
Project Description: Deluxe Manufacturing Operations has requested an Approval Order to operate
the printing operations. The operations include various printing presses, natural
gas-fired boilers, machine cleaners, and support equipment. All the printing
processes use the offset lithography technique. Volatile organic compounds
emissions from the printing operations are limited to 20.42 tpy.

The completed engineering evaluation and air quality impact analysis showed the proposed project meets
the requirements of federal air quality regulations and the State air quality rules. The Director intends to
issue an Approval Order pending a 30-day public comment period. The project proposal, estimate of the
effect on local air quality and draft Approval Order are available for public inspection and comment at the
Utah Division of Air Quality, 195 North 1950 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116. Written comments
received by the Division at this same address on or before January 16, 2024 will be considered in making
the final decision on the approval/disapproval of the proposed project. Email comments will also be
accepted at [e-mail]. If anyone so requests to the Director in writing within 15 days of publication
of this notice, a hearing will be held in accordance with R307-401-7, UAC.

Under Section 19-1-301.5, a person who wishes to challenge a Permit Order may only raise an issue or
argument during an adjudicatory proceeding that was raised during the public comment period and was
supported with sufficient information or documentation to enable the Director to fully consider the
substance and significance of the issue.

Date of Notice: December 17, 2023

{{#s=Sig_es_:signer1:signature}}

DAQE-

RN105100011
December 6, 2023

Lynn Grundvig
Deluxe Manufacturing Operations
5820 West Harold Gatty Drive
Salt Lake City, UT 84116
[e-mail]

Dear Lynn Grundvig,

Re: Engineer Review:
New Deluxe Manufacturing Operations Printing Facility
Project Number: N105100011

The DAQ requests a company representative review and sign the attached Engineer Review (ER). This
ER identifies all applicable elements of the New Source Review permitting program. Deluxe
Manufacturing Operations should complete this review within 10 business days of receipt.

Deluxe Manufacturing Operations should contact Mr. Enqiang He at [phone] if there are
questions or concerns with the review of the draft permit conditions. Upon resolution of your concerns,
please email Mr. Enqiang He at [e-mail] the signed cover letter. Upon receipt of the signed cover
letter, the DAQ will prepare an ITA for a 30-day public comment period. At the completion of the
comment period, the DAQ will address any comments and will prepare an Approval Order (AO) for
signature by the DAQ Director.

If Deluxe Manufacturing Operations does not respond to this letter within 10 business days, the project
will move forward without source concurrence. If Deluxe Manufacturing Operations has concerns that
cannot be resolved and the project becomes stagnant, the DAQ Director may issue an Order prohibiting
construction.

Approval Signature _____________________________________________________________
(Signature & Date)

195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144820 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone] • T.D.D. [phone]
www.deq.utah.gov
Printed on 100% recycled paper
Department of
Environmental Quality

Kimberly D. Shelley Executive Director

DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
Bryce C. Bird Director

State of Utah

SPENCER J. COX
Governor

DEIDRE HENDERSON
Lieutenant Governor

Engineer Review N105100011: Deluxe Manufacturing Operations- Coldset Printing Presses & Stamping
December 6, 2023
Page 1
UTAH DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
ENGINEER REVIEW

SOURCE INFORMATION

Project Number N105100011
Owner Name Deluxe Manufacturing Operations
Mailing Address 5820 West Harold Gatty Drive
Salt Lake City, UT 84116

Source Name Deluxe Manufacturing Operations - Coldset Printing Presses &
Stamping
Source Location 5820 West Harold Gatty Dr.
Salt Lake City, UT 84116

UTM Projection 412,890 m Easting, 4,515,000 m Northing
UTM Datum NAD83
UTM Zone UTM Zone 12
SIC Code 2761 (Manifold Business Forms)

Source Contact Lynn Grundvig
Phone Number [phone]
Email [e-mail]

Billing Contact Lynn Grundvig
Phone Number [phone]
Email [e-mail]

Project Engineer Mr. Enqiang He, Engineer
Phone Number [phone]
Email [e-mail]

Notice of Intent (NOI) Submitted June 26, 2023
Date of Accepted Application December 6, 2023

Engineer Review N105100011: Deluxe Manufacturing Operations- Coldset Printing Presses & Stamping
December 6, 2023
Page 2
SOURCE DESCRIPTION

General Description
Deluxe Manufacturing Operations (Deluxe) operates a check printing facility in Salt Lake City.
All the printing processes use the offset lithography technique. Deluxe also operates natural gas
combustion equipment. VOC emissions from the printing operations are limited to 20.42 tpy.

NSR Classification:
New Minor Source

Source Classification
Located in Northern Wasatch Front O3 NAA, Salt Lake City UT PM2.5 NAA, Salt Lake County
SO2 NAA
Salt Lake County
Airs Source Size: B

Applicable Federal Standards
None

Project Proposal
New Deluxe Manufacturing Operations Printing Facility

Project Description
Deluxe Manufacturing Operations has requested an AO to conduct printing operations. The
operations include various printing presses, natural gas-fired boilers, machine cleaners, and
support equipment.

EMISSION IMPACT ANALYSIS
All criteria pollutant emissions are either below their respective modeling thresholds, or the area is
nonattainment for the pollutants including PM2.5 and SO2; therefore, modeling is not required. [Last updated
October 23, 2023]

Engineer Review N105100011: Deluxe Manufacturing Operations- Coldset Printing Presses & Stamping
December 6, 2023
Page 3
SUMMARY OF EMISSIONS

The emissions listed below are an estimate of the total potential emissions from the source. Some
rounding of emissions is possible.

Criteria Pollutant Change (TPY) Total (TPY)
CO2 Equivalent 317.00
Carbon Monoxide 0.22
Nitrogen Oxides 0.13
Particulate Matter - PM10 0.02
Particulate Matter - PM2.5 0.02
Sulfur Dioxide 0.00
Volatile Organic Compounds 20.43

Note: Change in emissions indicates the difference between previous AO and proposed modification.

Engineer Review N105100011: Deluxe Manufacturing Operations- Coldset Printing Presses & Stamping
December 6, 2023
Page 4
Review of BACT for New/Modified Emission Units

1. BACT review regarding VOC emitting equipment
Deluxe Manufacturing Operations operates heatset web offset lithographic printers in Salt Lake
City, Salt Lake County. Available control technologies include thermal/catalytic oxidizers, chiller
condensers, low VOC substitute materials, and work practices. The US EPA conducted cost
analysis on the add-on controls including oxidizers and condensers, and found that the add-on
controls were not cost effective for an individual press emitting less than 25 tpy of VOCs. The
agency, therefore, would not recommend any add-on control be used if an individual press emits
less than 25 tpy of VOCs (Control Techniques Guidelines for Offset Lithographic printing and
Letterpress Printing, EPA-453/R06-002). Deluxe Manufacturing Operations' highest VOC-
emission units, HP 100K and HP 7900 printing presses, will emit 4.68 tpy each. Other presses will
emit much less. Therefore, it would be economically infeasible to install and operate any add-on
control technology to control VOC emissions from the presses on site.

The source is located in a nonattainment area for ozone, therefore, it is subject to the requirements
in UAC R307-351. The requirements include applicable VOC content limits and work practices
including keeping cleaning materials, used shop towel, and solvent wiping cloths in closed
containers.

In addition, the source shall also be subject to UAC R307-325. These are general provisions that
require sources in an ozone nonattainment area not to spill, discard, or store any VOC containing
materials in any other manner that could results in greater VOC emissions.

The minor NSR Section considers the above applicable RACT as BACT. [Last updated November
17, 2023]

SECTION I: GENERAL PROVISIONS

The intent is to issue an air quality AO authorizing the project with the following recommended
conditions and that failure to comply with any of the conditions may constitute a violation of the
AO. (New or Modified conditions are indicated as “New” in the Outline Label):

I.1 All definitions, terms, abbreviations, and references used in this AO conform to those used in
the UAC R307 and 40 CFR. Unless noted otherwise, references cited in these AO conditions
refer to those rules. [R307-101]

I.2 The limits set forth in this AO shall not be exceeded without prior approval. [R307-401]

I.3 Modifications to the equipment or processes approved by this AO that could affect the
emissions covered by this AO must be reviewed and approved. [R307-401-1]

I.4 All records referenced in this AO or in other applicable rules, which are required to be kept by
the owner/operator, shall be made available to the Director or Director's representative upon
request, and the records shall include the two-year period prior to the date of the request.
Unless otherwise specified in this AO or in other applicable state and federal rules, records
shall be kept for a minimum of two (2) years. [R307-401-8]

Engineer Review N105100011: Deluxe Manufacturing Operations- Coldset Printing Presses & Stamping
December 6, 2023
Page 5
I.5 At all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, owners and operators
shall, to the extent practicable, maintain and operate any equipment approved under this AO,
including associated air pollution control equipment, in a manner consistent with good air
pollution control practice for minimizing emissions. Determination of whether acceptable
operating and maintenance procedures are being used will be based on information available
to the Director which may include, but is not limited to, monitoring results, opacity
observations, review of operating and maintenance procedures, and inspection of the source.
All maintenance performed on equipment authorized by this AO shall be recorded. [R307-
401-4]

I.6 The owner/operator shall comply with UAC R307-107. General Requirements: Breakdowns.
[R307-107]

I.7 The owner/operator shall comply with UAC R307-150 Series. Emission Inventories. [R307-
150]

I.8 The owner/operator shall submit documentation of the status of construction or modification
to the Director within 18 months from the date of this AO. This AO may become invalid if
construction is not commenced within 18 months from the date of this AO or if construction is
discontinued for 18 months or more. To ensure proper credit when notifying the Director,
send the documentation to the Director, attn.: NSR Section. [R307-401-18]

SECTION II: PERMITTED EQUIPMENT
The intent is to issue an air quality AO authorizing the project with the following recommended
conditions and that failure to comply with any of the conditions may constitute a violation of the
AO. (New or Modified conditions are indicated as “New” in the Outline Label):

II.A THE APPROVED EQUIPMENT

II.A.1 Deluxe Manufacturing Operations
Printing operations

II.A.2
NEW
Digital Offset Press
Two (2) HP 100K digital offset presses

II.A.3
NEW
Digital Press
One (1) HP 7900 digital press

II.A.4
NEW
Printing Press
One (1) HP T250 thermal inkjet printing press

II.A.5
NEW
Printing Presses
Five (5) two-color Heidelberg GTO 52 presses

II.A.6
NEW
Printing Presses
Nineteen (19) DCOP presses

Engineer Review N105100011: Deluxe Manufacturing Operations- Coldset Printing Presses & Stamping
December 6, 2023
Page 6
II.A.7
NEW
Printing Presses
One (1) Heidelberg 6-color speedmaster printing press

II.A.8
NEW
Printing Presses
Two (2) Ryobi presses

II.A.9
NEW
Printing Presses
Three (3) Halm jet presses

II.A.10
NEW
Machine Cleaners/Oilers
Three (3) numbering machine cleaners/oilers

II.A.11
NEW
Printing Press
One (1) six-color Didde press

II.A.12
NEW
Printing Press
One (1) four-color Didde press

II.A.13
NEW
Printing Press
One (1) four-color Heidelberg GTO 52 press

II.A.14
NEW
Printing Press
One (1) two-color super jet press

II.A.15
NEW
Support Equipment
One (1) folder

II.A.16
NEW
Support Equipment
One (1) collator

II.A.17
NEW
Support Equipment
One (1) Kodak plate maker

II.A.18
NEW
Various Boilers
Rating: < 5 MMBtu/hr each
Fuel: Natural gas
(Exempt equipment; for information only)

II.A.19
NEW
Finishing Area
One (1) finishing operation area

II.A.20
NEW
UV Curing Units
Six (6) electrical UV curing units (for information only)

Engineer Review N105100011: Deluxe Manufacturing Operations- Coldset Printing Presses & Stamping
December 6, 2023
Page 7
SECTION II: SPECIAL PROVISIONS
The intent is to issue an air quality AO authorizing the project with the following recommended
conditions and that failure to comply with any of the conditions may constitute a violation of the
AO. (New or Modified conditions are indicated as “New” in the Outline Label):

II.B REQUIREMENTS AND LIMITATIONS

II.B.1 Site-Wide Requirements and Limitations
II.B.1.a
NEW
The owner/operator shall not allow visible emissions from any emission point to exceed 20%
opacity. [R307-401-8]

II.B.1.a.1 Opacity observations of emissions from stationary sources shall be conducted according to 40
CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 9. [R307-401-8]

II.B.2 VOC and HAP Limitations
II.B.2.a
NEW
The owner/operator shall not emit more than 20.42 tons of VOCs per rolling 12-month period
from the printer presses, cleaning solvents, and associated operations. [R307-401-8]

II.B.2.a.1
NEW
The owner/operator shall calculate a new 12-month total by the 20th day of each month using
data from the previous 12 months. The owner/operator shall use a mass-balance method to
calculate emissions from evaporative sources. The owner/operator may use the following
equations with applicable units to comply with the mass-balance method:

VOCs = [% VOCs by Weight/100] x [Density] x [Volume Consumed]

[R307-401-8]

II.B.2.a.2
NEW
The owner/operator shall use a mass-balance method to quantify any amount of VOCs
reclaimed. The owner/operator shall subtract the amount of VOCs reclaimed from the
quantities calculated above to provide the monthly total VOC emissions. [R307-401-8]

II.B.2.a.3
NEW
The owner/operator shall keep records each month of the following:

A. The name (as per SDS) of the VOC-emitting material

B. The maximum percent by weight of VOCs in each material used

C. The density of each material used

D. The volume of each VOC-emitting material used

E. The amount of VOCs emitted from each material

F. The amount of VOCs reclaimed and/or controlled from
each material

G. The total amount of VOCs emitted from all materials (in tons)

[R307-401-8]

Engineer Review N105100011: Deluxe Manufacturing Operations- Coldset Printing Presses & Stamping
December 6, 2023
Page 8
II.B.2.b
NEW
The owner/operator shall not use any material containing HAPs in inks, fountain solution, and
cleaning solvents. [R307-401-8]

II.B.2.c
NEW
The owner/operator shall comply with the applicable requirements in UAC R307-325, Ozone
Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas: General Requirements, and R307-351, Graphic Arts.
[R307-325, R307-351]

Engineer Review N105100011: Deluxe Manufacturing Operations- Coldset Printing Presses & Stamping
December 6, 2023
Page 9
PERMIT HISTORY

When issued, the approval order shall supersede (if a modification) or will be based on the
following documents:

Is Derived From NOI dated June 26, 2023
Incorporates Additional information dated July 12, 2023
Incorporates Additional information dated October 16, 2023
Incorporates Additional information dated December 5, 2023

REVIEWER COMMENTS

1. Comment regarding source history:
The source was issued AO DAQE-AN105100008-18 dated October 10, 2018, to operate various
printing presses. The source submitted a request dated June 30, 2021, to revoke its AO due to the
fact that the source emitted below the small source thresholds per R307-401-9, Small Source
Exemption. Therefore, the AO was revoked on September 27, 2021. The source continued to
operate as an exempted small source after the AO was revoked. On June 26, 2023, the DAQ
received an NOI from the source, requesting an AO to operate the majority equipment in the 2018
AO. In addition, the source has requested to install and operate five (5) new presses. The NOI
shows that the source will emit more than the small source thresholds; therefore, the NOI was
reviewed in accordance with the current State air quality rules and Federal regulations. All
equipment is treated as new. [Last updated October 30, 2023]

2. Comment regarding Federal Standard and Title V Applicability:
40 CFR Part 60, Subpart QQ - Standards of Performance for the Graphic Arts Industry:
Publication Rotogravure Printing The source does not have rotogravure process. Therefore, this
standard does not apply.

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart KK - National Emission Standards for the Printing and Publishing
Industry Deluxe Manufacturing Operations is not a major HAP source; therefore, this rule does not
apply.

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJ - National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Paper
and Other Web Coating The source does not produce any of the listed products, therefore, it does not
apply to this source.

Deluxe Manufacturing Operations is not a major source, is not subject to any federal standards, and
is not a Title IV source; therefore, it is not a Title V source.

[Last updated October 23, 2023]

3. Comment regarding emission calculations:
The source will operate the HP 100K, HP T250, and HP 7900 presses for no more than 6,240 hours
per year. Emission factors for these three types of presses are 1.5 lbs VOC/hr, 0.63 lbs VOC/hr, and
1.5 lbs VOC/hr, respectively. Emissions from existing equipment are based on average emissions
over the two-year period prior to the NOI submittal. Emissions from natural gas combustion are
derived using 5.28 MMscf annual natural gas consumption and the emission factors from AP-42
Section 1.4. [Last updated October 23, 2023]

Engineer Review N105100011: Deluxe Manufacturing Operations- Coldset Printing Presses & Stamping
December 6, 2023
Page 10

Engineer Review N105100011: Deluxe Manufacturing Operations- Coldset Printing Presses & Stamping
December 6, 2023
Page 11
ACRONYMS
The following lists commonly used acronyms and associated translations as they apply to this
document:
40 CFR Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations
AO Approval Order
BACT Best Available Control Technology
CAA Clean Air Act
CAAA Clean Air Act Amendments
CDS Classification Data System (used by EPA to classify sources by size/type)
CEM Continuous emissions monitor
CEMS Continuous emissions monitoring system
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CMS Continuous monitoring system
CO Carbon monoxide
CO2 Carbon Dioxide
CO2e Carbon Dioxide Equivalent - 40 CFR Part 98, Subpart A, Table A-1
COM Continuous opacity monitor
DAQ/UDAQ Division of Air Quality
DAQE This is a document tracking code for internal UDAQ use
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
FDCP Fugitive dust control plan
GHG Greenhouse Gas(es) - 40 CFR 52.21 (b)(49)(i)
GWP Global Warming Potential - 40 CFR Part 86.1818-12(a)
HAP or HAPs Hazardous air pollutant(s)
ITA Intent to Approve
LB/HR Pounds per hour
LB/YR Pounds per year
MACT Maximum Achievable Control Technology
MMBTU Million British Thermal Units
NAA Nonattainment Area
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NESHAP National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
NOI Notice of Intent
NOx Oxides of nitrogen
NSPS New Source Performance Standard
NSR New Source Review
PM10 Particulate matter less than 10 microns in size
PM2.5 Particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size
PSD Prevention of Significant Deterioration
PTE Potential to Emit
R307 Rules Series 307
R307-401 Rules Series 307 - Section 401
SO2 Sulfur dioxide
Title IV Title IV of the Clean Air Act
Title V Title V of the Clean Air Act
TPY Tons per year
UAC Utah Administrative Code
VOC Volatile organic compounds

DAQE-

RN105100011
December 6, 2023
Lynn Grundvig
Deluxe Manufacturing Operations
5820 West Harold Gatty Drive
Salt Lake City, UT 84116
[e-mail]
Dear Lynn Grundvig,
Re: Engineer Review:
New Deluxe Manufacturing Operations Printing Facility
Project Number: N105100011
The DAQ requests a company representative review and sign the attached Engineer Review (ER). This
ER identifies all applicable elements of the New Source Review permitting program. Deluxe
Manufacturing Operations should complete this review within 10 business days of receipt.
Deluxe Manufacturing Operations should contact Mr. Enqiang He at [phone] if there are
questions or concerns with the review of the draft permit conditions. Upon resolution of your concerns,
please email Mr. Enqiang He at [e-mail] the signed cover letter. Upon receipt of the signed cover
letter, the DAQ will prepare an ITA for a 30-day public comment period. At the completion of the
comment period, the DAQ will address any comments and will prepare an Approval Order (AO) for
signature by the DAQ Director.
If Deluxe Manufacturing Operations does not respond to this letter within 10 business days, the project
will move forward without source concurrence. If Deluxe Manufacturing Operations has concerns that
cannot be resolved and the project becomes stagnant, the DAQ Director may issue an Order prohibiting
construction.
Approval Signature _____________________________________________________________
(Signature & Date)
195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144820 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone] • T.D.D. [phone]
www.deq.utah.gov
Printed on 100% recycled paper
Department of
Environmental Quality
Kimberly D. Shelley
Executive Director
DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
Bryce C. Bird
Director
State of Utah
SPENCER J. COX
Governor
DEIDRE HENDERSON
Lieutenant Governor
12/8/2023
Page 1 of 1
Company___________________________
Site _____________________________
Form 5
Emissions Information
Criteria/GHGs/ HAP’s
Utah Division of Air Quality
New Source Review Section
Potential to Emit* Criteria Pollutants & GHGs
Criteria Pollutants Permitted Emissions
(tons/yr)
Emissions Increases
(tons/yr)
Proposed Emissions
(tons/yr)
PM10 Total
PM10 Fugitive
PM2.5
NOx
SO2
CO
VOC
VOC Fugitive
NH3
Greenhouse Gases CO2e CO2e CO2e
CO2
CH4
N2O
HFCs
PFCs
SF6
Total CO2e
*Potential to emit to include pollution control equipment as defined by R307-401-2.
Hazardous Air Pollutants** (**Defined in Section 112(b) of the Clean Air Act )
Hazardous Air
Pollutant***
Permitted Emissions
(tons/yr)
Emission Increase
(tons/yr)
Proposed
Emission (tons/yr)
Emission Increase
(lbs/hr)
Total HAP
*** Use additional sheets for pollutants if needed
Emissions Calculations
Boilers
Deluxe Manufacturing Operations
Salt Lake City Facility
5820 West Harold Gatty Drive
Salt Lake City, Utah 84116
Project B2300672
Emission Unit Capacity
(MMBtu/Hr)
Heat Content of
Natural Gas
(Btu/Ft3)
Pollutant of
Concern
Emission
Factor AP-421 Units
Emission
Factor
(Lb/DTH)2
PM 7.6 lb/MMscf 7.45E-03
SO2 0.6 lb/MMscf 5.88E-04
NOx 50 lb/MMscf 4.90E-02
VOC 5.5 lb/MMscf 5.39E-03
CO 84 lb/MMscf 8.23E-02
1Emissions factors based on USEPA AP-42 guidance (1.4 Natural Gas Combustion). Used factors for wall fired or low NOx burners.
6,240 annual operating hours (hrs/year)
lb/hr tons/yr lb/hr tons/yr lb/hr tons/yr lb/hr tons/yr lb/hr tons/yr
445 0.01 0.02 5.03E-04 1.57E-03 0.04 0.13 4.61E-03 0.01 0.07 0.22
1Annual emissions calculated using max monthly natural gas usage over last 2 years. This usage number includes both boilers.
Example Calculations:
VOC CO
Pollutant of Concern Emissions
2PM (total, condensible, and filterable) is assumed to be less than 1.0 micrometer in diameter. Therefore, the PM emission factors presented
here may be used to estimate PM10, PM2.5 or PM
Natural Gas Boiler
(2, Units Rated at 4.00 MMBTU/HR)4.00 1,020
Natural Gas Consumption1
(Max MMBtu/Month)PM SO2 NOx
ସସହ ௠௠௕௧௨/௠௢
ଵ,଴ଶ଴ ௕௧௨/௙௧ଷ ∗଻.଺ ௟௕
௠௠௦௖௙ ∗ 12 𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑡ℎ𝑠 ∗ଵ ௧௢௡
ଶ଴଴଴ ௟௕ =0.02 tons/yr PM
଴.଴ଶ ௧௢௡௦
௬௘௔௥ ∗ଶ଴଴଴ ௟௕
௧௢௡ ∗ଵ
଺,ଶସ଴ ௛௥௦ =0.01 lbs/hr PM
Table 1
Emissions Calculations
Deluxe Manufacturing Operations
Salt Lake City Facility
5820 West Harold Gatty Drive
Salt Lake City, Utah 84116
Project B2300672
Actual Operating Hours 6,240 hrs/year
lb/hour tons/yr lb/hour
1 tons/yr lb/hour
1 tons/yr lb/hour
1 tons/yr lb/hour
1 tons/yr
5.05 20.43 0.00 0.002 0.04 0.13 0.01 0.02 0.07 0.22
lb/hour tons/yr
Electro ink
Imaging Oil
Imaging Agent
Recycling Agent
Notes:
1Emissions information provided by manufacturer.
lb/hour tons/yr
Electro ink
Imaging Oil
Imaging Agent
Recycling Agent
Notes:
1Emissions information provided by manufacturer.
lb/hour tons/yr
Electro ink
Imaging Oil
Imaging Agent
Recycling Agent
Notes:
9.361.5
Proposed Site Wide Emissions
VOC SO2 NOx PM CO
Increased Emissions 1
Equipment
# of
Equipment Material
VOM Emissions
HP 7900 Digital
Printing Press 1 1.50 4.68
T250 Thermal Inkjet
Printing Press 1 0.63 1.97
Increased Emissions 1
Equipment
# of
Equipment Material
VOM Emissions
HP 100K Digital
Printing Press 2
Increased Emissions 1
Equipment
# of
Equipment Material
VOM Emissions
Table 1
Emissions Calculations
Deluxe Manufacturing Operations
Salt Lake City Facility
5820 West Harold Gatty Drive
Salt Lake City, Utah 84116
Project B2300672
lb/hour1 tons/yr
5
19
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
3
3
1
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Notes
1Hourly emissions calculated by averaging annual emissions over year.
3Emissions represent the highest rolling 12 month average from previous two years of operations of listed eqiupment.
lb/hour tons/yr
1 lb/hour tons/yr
1 lb/hour tons/yr
1 lb/hour tons/yr
1 lb/hour tons/yr
1
2 0.01 0.02 5.03E-04 1.57E-03 0.04 0.13 4.61E-03 0.01 0.07 0.22
1Annual emissions calculated using max monthly emissions over last 2 years.
Two Color Heidelberg MOZ Press
Ofcon Continuous Press
DCOP Press
Two Color Heidelberg GTO 52 Press
Equipment
Ryobi Press
Heath Pak-to-Pak Printing Press
Continous Heath Press
Heidelberg 6-color speedmaster
printing press
Concept Press
Current Emissions, Printing Operations 2
# of Equipment
VOM Emissions
1The HP 7900 is a smaller version of the HP100K, and both are HP Indigo Digital
printers. Emissions for the 7900 are conservatively assumed to be equal to the
provided emissions for the 100k.
1.41 4.41
Equipment # of Equipment
PM
Finishing Operations Area
Kodak Plate Maker
Collator
Four-color Didde Press
Support Folder
Two Color Super Jet Press
Four Color Heidelberg GTO 52 Press
Electrical UV Curing Units
Six Color Didde Press
Numbering Machine Cleaner/Oiler
Halm Jet Press
VOC CO
Current Emissions, Boilers
Natural Gas Boilers
SO2 NOx
10/18/23, 12:34 PM State of Utah Mail - Deluxe Corporation N10510 NOI
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=20ff41d2e4&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-2411173410967665948&simpl=msg-a:r80408855619772…1/10
Enqiang He <[e-mail]>
Deluxe Corporation N10510 NOI
6 messages
Enqiang He <[e-mail]>Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 10:05 PM
To: "Grundvig, Lynn" <[e-mail]>
Cc: Alan Humpherys <[e-mail]>
Hello Lynn,
The Division of Air Quality has received your Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted 06/22/23.
I was assigned to review the permit application. I have conducted an administrative
review on the NOI, here are some questions I'd like your help with:
1. BACT analysis for all equipment. Even though the "existing" equipment was
permitted before, the permit was cancelled. Therefore, all emission units are subject to
BACT analysis during this current review. The current BACT analysis as submitted is
inadequate.
2. There may be State rules that have not been evaluated. For example, R307-351.
Please also evaluate other rules that may be applicable to Deluxe.
3. The previously cancelled AO contains HAPs. Please make sure HAP emissions are
estimated, if any.
Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks,
EQ He, CPM
Permitting Engineer, Minor NSR Section, Permitting Branch |
Division of Air Quality
1950 West 195 North, Salt Lake City, UT 84116
Phone: [phone]
[e-mail]
Grundvig, Lynn <[e-mail]>Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 12:27 PM
To: Enqiang He <[e-mail]>
Cc: Alan Humpherys <[e-mail]>
Mr. He,

Thank you for your quick review of our application. I will work on our responses and get back to you shortly.

10/18/23, 12:34 PM State of Utah Mail - Deluxe Corporation N10510 NOI
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=20ff41d2e4&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-2411173410967665948&simpl=msg-a:r80408855619772…2/10
Message originates from outside our organization. Use caution with correspondence, attachments or hyperlinks (URLs).

Lynn Grundvig
Environmental, Safety and Health Manager
5820 W Harold Gatty Dr
Salt Lake City UT 84116
C: 435.830.0590

deluxe.com | NYSE: dlx

From: Enqiang He <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 10:06 PM
To: Grundvig, Lynn <[e-mail]>
Cc: Alan Humpherys <[e-mail]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Deluxe Corporation N10510 NOI

[Quoted text hidden]
Grundvig, Lynn <[e-mail]>Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 12:27 PM
To: Enqiang He <[e-mail]>
Cc: Alan Humpherys <[e-mail]>
Hi EQ,

Please see the attached document. I have worked with my consultant to provide responses to your questions. We would
be glad to meet and discuss any details if needed.

Lynn Grundvig
Environmental, Safety and Health Manager
10/18/23, 12:34 PM State of Utah Mail - Deluxe Corporation N10510 NOI
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=20ff41d2e4&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-2411173410967665948&simpl=msg-a:r80408855619772…3/10
Message originates from outside our organization. Use caution with correspondence, attachments or hyperlinks (URLs).
5820 W Harold Gatty Dr
Salt Lake City UT 84116
C: 435.830.0590

deluxe.com | NYSE: dlx

From: Enqiang He <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 10:06 PM
To: Grundvig, Lynn <[e-mail]>
Cc: Alan Humpherys <[e-mail]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Deluxe Corporation N10510 NOI

Hello Lynn,
[Quoted text hidden]
Response to Comments 2023.07.11.pdf
795K
Enqiang He <[e-mail]>Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 11:19 PM
To: "Grundvig, Lynn" <[e-mail]>
Hi Lynn,
I have finished the technical review of your NOI and additional information submitted. I
have the following questions, most of them are related to emission calculations:
1. For the 100K Digital printing presses, should the VOC emissions be 9.36 tpy
because there are two such presses?
2. What is "VOM" emissions?
3. Can you provide how the current VOC emissions (4.41 tpy) were calculated. You
currently do not have an Approval Order (air quality permit); therefore, any current
emissions are treated as new emissions.
4. Show emission calculations for the two boilers.
10/18/23, 12:34 PM State of Utah Mail - Deluxe Corporation N10510 NOI
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=20ff41d2e4&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-2411173410967665948&simpl=msg-a:r80408855619772…4/10
Please provide the above-requested information within two weeks from today. Thank
you,
EQ He, CPM
Permitting Engineer, Minor NSR Section, Permitting Branch |
Division of Air Quality
1950 West 195 North, Salt Lake City, UT 84116
Phone: [phone]
[e-mail]
[Quoted text hidden]
2 attachments
image001.png
8K
image001.png
8K
Grundvig, Lynn <[e-mail]>Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 7:45 AM
To: Enqiang He <[e-mail]>
Good morning EQ,

Thanks for the correspondence. We will have the needed information delivered to you within the requested timeframe.
[Quoted text hidden]
Grundvig, Lynn <[e-mail]>Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 1:11 PM
To: Enqiang He <[e-mail]>
Cc: "Adams, Jennifer" <[e-mail]>
Hi EQ,

Below is our response as prepared by Jennifer Adams of Braun-Intertec on behalf of Deluxe corporation. I have copied
her on the response. I will be unavailable for the rest of this week. We have authorized Jennifer to respond directly to any
additional questions unless a company representative is required.

Good afternoon! Please see our responses to your questions below. For ease of review, your questions are presented in
italics with our responses below.

10/18/23, 12:34 PM State of Utah Mail - Deluxe Corporation N10510 NOI
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=20ff41d2e4&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-2411173410967665948&simpl=msg-a:r80408855619772…5/10
1. For the 100K Digital printing presses, should the VOC emissions be 9.36 tpy because there are two such presses?
That is correct. The calculations for the site have been updated and attached (Table 1 and Form 5).

2. What is "VOM" emissions?
VOM = Volatile Organic Material, also VOC, so VOM = VOC.

3. Can you provide how the current VOC emissions (4.41 tpy) were calculated. You currently do not have an Approval
Order (air quality permit); therefore, any current emissions are treated as new emissions.
This site previously operated under an Approval Order: DAQE-AN105100008-18. The Site revoked this permit in 2021
because actual emissions fell below the 5 ton per year threshold (DAQE-GN100009-21). We are submitting this NOI due
to the site’s plan to install new equipment. We reached out to the State prior to submitting this NOI to confirm our
emissions calculation approach based on Utah DEQ air quality rules. Since the existing equipment has operated on site in
excess of two years (24 months), we used actual emissions for existing equipment per R307-401-2. Actual emissions are
based on actual quantities of chemicals used and VOC content of the chemicals from SDS data. The highest 12-month
rolling sum in the 24 months preceding application preparation was used as the annual emission estimate. We used
potential-to-emit for the new equipment: the (2) HP 100K presses; the (1) T250 thermal inkjet press, and the (1) HP 7900
digital press. We are attaching the communication with the State for additional detail. We are also attaching the previous
Approval Order and Revocation.

4. Show emission calculations for the two boilers.
The site currently tracks monthly emissions using an emission calculator. This calculator uses AP-42-1.4 Natural Gas
Combustion emission factors for low NOx burners. We conservatively used the highest natural gas consumption in a
single month over the last two years to calculate boiler emissions. We are attaching more detailed boiler calculations.
Additionally, we noticed a minor calculation error for the boilers which has been corrected. The calculations for the site
have been updated and attached (Table 1 and Form 5).
[Quoted text hidden]
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Alan Humpherys <[e-mail]>
To: "Adams, Jennifer" <[e-mail]>
Cc: Joe Thomas <[e-mail]>
Bcc:
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 16:47:59 +0000
Subject: Re: Air Permitting Question
Jennifer,
You can include controls and other reasonable assumptions when you are estimating emissions.
Thanks,
Alan
On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 8:45 AM Adams, Jennifer <[e-mail]> wrote:
Thanks Alan! Sorry- one more clarification question. Based on this part of the definition of “Actual Emissions,” would a
new source expected to have actual emissions below the threshold still have to use PTE for the small source
exemption since it’s a new source? Does it help that the site has the same piece of equipment already on site and are
just adding a second identical one, so technically we have actuals for that type of equipment? The addition of the new
equipment will not push the site over the 5 TPY threshold using true actual emissions.

Thanks for your help on this.

10/18/23, 12:34 PM State of Utah Mail - Deluxe Corporation N10510 NOI
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=20ff41d2e4&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-2411173410967665948&simpl=msg-a:r80408855619772…6/10
You don't often get email from [e-mail]. Learn why this is important

Jennifer Adams
Vice President, Principal Consultant
2105 Donley Drive Suite 400 | Austin, TX 78758
214.886.1982 cell
[e-mail]
braunintertec.com |Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook

From: Alan Humpherys <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2022 10:01 AM
To: Adams, Jennifer <[e-mail]>
Cc: Joe Thomas <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Air Permitting Question

Jennifer,

An emissions unit needs to operate for two years (24 months) to have actual emissions equal
something different than potential emissions. If you have any other questions about this, please
let me know.

Thanks,
Alan

On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 8:55 AM Adams, Jennifer <[e-mail]> wrote:
Alan-
Thank you for this reply. I have a clarification question about the definition of “Actual Emissions.” Part d of that
definitions states that "For any emissions unit that has not begun normal operation on the particular date, actual
emissions shall equal the potential to emit of the unit on that date.”
Again, once the source is operating actual emissions will remain under the small source exemption.

Thanks!
Jennifer

10/18/23, 12:34 PM State of Utah Mail - Deluxe Corporation N10510 NOI
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=20ff41d2e4&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-2411173410967665948&simpl=msg-a:r80408855619772…7/10
You don't often get email from [e-mail]. Learn why this is important
From: Alan Humpherys <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2022 6:09 PM
To: Adams, Jennifer <[e-mail]>
Cc: Joe Thomas <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Air Permitting Question

Jennifer,

I was asked to respond to a question that you had.

R307-401-9 specifies that the small source exemption thresholds apply to "Actual Emissions."
If "Actual Emissions" are below the thresholds in R307-401-9, the source is not required to
submit a notice of intent under R307-401-5. "Actual Emissions" is defined in R307-401-2. If you
have questions about how to calculate your actual emissions or anything else, please let me
know.

Thanks,
Alan

On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 3:31 PM Joe Thomas <[e-mail]> wrote:
Could you prepare a response to this inquiry. Thanks Alan!

Joe Thomas
Assistant Director
Email: [e-mail]
Phone: Office [phone]
Main Office: [phone]
airquality.utah.gov

10/18/23, 12:34 PM State of Utah Mail - Deluxe Corporation N10510 NOI
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=20ff41d2e4&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-2411173410967665948&simpl=msg-a:r80408855619772…8/10
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Adams, Jennifer <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 11:32 AM
Subject: Air Permitting Question
To: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>

Joe-
Good afternoon! I have an air permitting question regarding when to submit an NOI. I have a client that is currently
operating under the small source exemption. They would like to add a source to the site. PTE calculations
potentially show the site exceeding the small source threshold, but actual emissions should not exceed for the
site, even with the addition. They are also removing a similar source at the same time.

My question is, do we need to use PTE and submit an NOI for the new installation, or can they continue to operate
under the small source exemption since actual emission for the site will remain below the small source threshold?

Thank you!

Jennifer Adams
Vice President, Principal Consultant
2105 Donley Drive Suite 400 | Austin, TX 78758
214.886.1982 cell
[e-mail]
braunintertec.com |Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook

--
Alan Humpherys
Manager | Minor NSR Section
P: [phone]
F: [phone]
airquality.utah.gov
10/18/23, 12:34 PM State of Utah Mail - Deluxe Corporation N10510 NOI
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=20ff41d2e4&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-2411173410967665948&simpl=msg-a:r80408855619772…9/10

Emails to and from this email address may be considered public records and thus subject to Utah GRAMA
requirements.

--
Alan Humpherys
Manager | Minor NSR Section
P: [phone]
F: [phone]
airquality.utah.gov
Emails to and from this email address may be considered public records and thus subject to Utah GRAMA
requirements.

--
Alan Humpherys
Manager | Minor NSR Section
P: [phone]
F: [phone]
airquality.utah.gov
Emails to and from this email address may be considered public records and thus subject to Utah GRAMA
requirements.
10/18/23, 12:34 PM State of Utah Mail - Deluxe Corporation N10510 NOI
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=20ff41d2e4&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-2411173410967665948&simpl=msg-a:r8040885561977…10/10
6 attachments
Updated Table 1 Emissions Calculations - SLC NOI 2023.10.16.pdf
446K
DAQE-AN105100008-18.pdf
84K
DAQE-GN105100009-21.pdf
261K
Re: Air Permitting Question.eml
86K
Updated Boiler Calculations - Deluxe SCL NOI 2023.10.16.pdf
729K
Form 5_Emissions Information.pdf
231K

Braun Intertec Corporation 
11001 Hampshire Avenue S 
Minneapolis, MN  55438 
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Web: braunintertec.com
AA/EOE 
July 11, 2023 

Enqiang He  
Permitting Engineer, Minor NSR Section, Permitting Branch  
Division of Air Quality 
1950 West 195 North, Salt Lake City, UT 84116 

RE:  Notice of Intent Application – Response to Questions 
Deluxe Manufacturing Operations
5820 West Harold Gatty Drive
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84116

Dear Mr. Enqiang He: 

Deluxe Manufacturing Operations (Deluxe) received an email from you on June 27, 2023 with questions 
resulting from an administrative review of the notice of intent (NOI) application submitted by Deluxe on 
June 2, 2023 for three (3) new printing presses. Braun Intertec Corporation on behalf of Deluxe provides 
the following responses:  

1.  BACT analysis for all equipment.  Even though the "existing" equipment was permitted before, the 
permit was cancelled.  Therefore, all emission units are subject to BACT analysis during this current 
review.  The current BACT analysis as submitted is inadequate. 

Response to question/comment 1:  
Review of “existing” presses:
No individual press at the facility has a potential to emit (PTE) of 25 tons per year (tpy) or more of VOC 
(Volatile Organic Compound), which is the recommended threshold for requiring a control device for 
heatset web offset lithographic printing operations per Control Techniques Guidelines for Offset 
Lithographic Printing and Letterpress Printing, EPA‐453/R‐06. This reference was previously reviewed for 
the new presses and Braun Intertec believes that it also applies for the existing presses. In addition, it is 
considered infeasible to control VOC emissions from process lines with low VOC PTE and air flow rates. 
Deluxe uses two (2) primary inks in their “existing” presses that contain low VOCs. The VOC contents are 
150.59 grams VOC/L for Veratherm HH Black and 145 grams/L for Deluxe Magnetic Black. 
Review of existing natural gas boilers: 

Deluxe has 2 (two) existing natural gas boilers rated at 2.4 MMBtu/hr, each. Braun Intertec reviewed Best 
Available Control Technology (BACT) Analysis: Ultra‐Low NOx Burners on Natural Gas Fired Boilers 
written by Utah DEQ on 9/27/2022. Pages 6‐7 address boilers in the 2‐5 MMBtu/hr range.  

The review concluded that the use of ultra‐low NOx burners shows to be cost‐effective for both 
categories of boilers (2‐5 MMBtu/hr and >5 MMBtu/hr). The worst‐case scenario costs for boilers 
between 2‐5 MMBtu/hr were between $5,164 and $10,331. The calculated BACT cost for boilers 
between 2‐5 MMBtu/hr was between $2,567 and $7,208. The worst‐case scenario cost of boilers >5 
MMBtu/hr was estimated to be $5,221.95, while the BACT cost for boilers greater than 5 MMBtu/hr was 
Deluxe NOI Response to Questions  
Project B2300672 
July 11, 2023 
Page 2 

calculated to be between $575.26 and $680.51. Additionally, the retrofit cost analysis on a larger boiler 
also showed to be cost‐effective. These numbers show that implementing ultra‐low NOx burners on 
boilers in both size categories is cost‐effective and should be selected as BACT.  

Braun Intertec verified with Deluxe that the existing boilers do not have “ultra‐low NOx burners” and 
investigated the costs associated with potentially replacing the boilers. Deluxe found that this project 
would require ordering completely different boilers with different burners, blowers, and 
recirculation lines with an estimate of an additional $15,000 per boiler or $30,000 total. 

Deluxe also notes they do not have any exterior dimensions and that was one of the key factors in 
choosing the current boilers was size, in addition to steam and btu output. Deluxe would need to make 
renovations to its existing facility in order to be able to accommodate new boilers. Deluxe estimates an 
additional $10,000 to $15,000 for these renovations.  

In addition, you will find a copy of a July 23, 2018 letter from Deluxe to Utah DEQ provided as an 
attachment. This letter addresses boiler replacements at Deluxe. Deluxe replaced its boilers with more 
efficient design as they were replacing 25‐year‐old units. The new units, along with no longer using the 
boilers to control humidity was expected to reduce natural gas usage by approximately 10%, which 
would also reduce air emissions including NOx.  

Based on this information, Braun Intertec does not believe that it is feasible to retrofit the existing boilers 
and not cost‐effective to replace the boilers. 

2.  There may be State rules that have not been evaluated.  For example, R307‐351.  Please also 
evaluate other rules that may be applicable to Deluxe. 

Response to question/comment 2: Braun Intertec evaluated the project for Utah Air Quality Rules and 
includes the following evaluation. 

The purpose of R307‐351 is to limit volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from graphic arts printing 
operations. R307‐351 applies to graphic arts printing operations in Box Elder, Cache, Davis, Salt Lake, 
Utah and Weber counties. Since Deluxe is located in Salt Lake County, R307‐351 is potentially applicable. 

R307‐351‐4 defines "Graphic arts printing" as the application of words and images using the offset 
lithographic, letterpress, rotogravure, or flexographic printing process.  

R307‐351‐5(1) requires Heatset Web Offset Lithographic VOC content for inks at no greater than 400 g/L 
used in presses with potential to emit less than 10 tons per year unless the owner or operator uses an 
add‐on control devices as specified in R307‐351‐6. Note that PTE for the new presses is less than 10 TPY. 
The Safety Data Sheets (SDS) list inks with VOC content ranging from 105 to 159.3 g/L based on US EPA 
method 24. 

R307‐351‐7(1) requires work practices for graphic arts printing. Control techniques and work practices 
shall be implemented to reduce VOC emissions. Control techniques and work practices include: (a) 
Deluxe NOI Response to Questions  
Project B2300672 
July 11, 2023 
Page 3 

Keeping cleaning materials, used shop towels, and solvent wiping cloths in closed containers; and (b) 
Minimizing spills of VOC‐containing cleaning materials.  

R307‐351‐8(1) requires recordkeeping for graphic arts printing. The owner or operator shall maintain 
records of the following: (a) Records that demonstrate compliance with R307‐351. Records must include, 
but are not limited to, inventory and product data sheets of all graphic arts materials and cleaning 
solutions subject to R307‐351. (2) All records shall be maintained for a minimum of 2 years. (3) Records 
shall be made available to the director upon request. 

In addition, Braun Intertec reviewed the Utah Air Quality Rules and includes the following evaluation of 
the applicability of other regulations not addressed in the NOI application. 

R307‐201. Emission Standards: General Emission Standards. 
R307‐201 establishes emission standards for all areas of the state except for sources listed in section IX, 
Part H of the state implementation plan or located in a PM10 nonattainment or maintenance area. 
The facility is located in a PM10 nonattainment area so R307‐201 does not apply. 

R307‐202: Emission Standards: General Burning 
Deluxe does not burn any waste products. 

R307‐205: Emission Standards: Fugitive Emissions and Fugitive Dust 
This rule does not apply to PM10 nonattainment or maintenance areas.  

R307‐220: Emission Standards: Plan for Designated Facilities 
Deluxe’s operation is not in the list of Designated Facilities.  

R307‐305: Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas for PM10: Emission Standards. 
R307‐305‐3(1) limits visible emissions from existing installations except diesel engines to a shade or 
density no darker than 20% opacity. Visible emissions shall be measured using EPA Method 9. 

The new presses are expected to meet the 20% opacity limitation. 

R307‐309: Nonattainment Areas for PM10 and PM2.5: Fugitive Emissions and Fugitive Dust 
Pursuant to R307‐309‐6, any person owning or operating a new or existing source of fugitive dust, 
including storage, hauling or handling operations, clearing or leveling of land one‐quarter acre or greater 
in size, earthmoving, excavation, moving trucks or construction equipment over cleared land one‐quarter 
acre or greater in size or access haul roads, or demolition activities including razing homes, buildings or 
other structures, shall submit a fugitive dust control plan on a form provided by the director or another 
format approved by the director. 

This rule is not applicable to Deluxe’s operation, so a fugitive dust control plan is not addressed. The 
parking lot is paved and there are no storage or handling operations that would cause fugitive dust. In 
addition, all the industrial operations occur within the building. 

R307‐325: Ozone Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas: General Requirements 
Pursuant to R307‐325‐3, no person shall allow or cause volatile organic compounds (VOCs) to be spilled, 
discarded, stored in open containers, or handled in any other manner that would result in greater 
Deluxe NOI Response to Questions  
Project B2300672 
July 11, 2023 
Page 4 

evaporation of VOCs than would have if reasonably available control technology (RACT) had been 
applied.  

Deluxe is subject to R307‐351‐7(1) which requires specific work practices for graphic arts printing. Deluxe 
complies with this requirement by complying with R307‐351‐7(1). 

3.  The previously cancelled AO contains HAPs.  Please make sure HAP emissions are estimated, if any. 

Response to question/comment 3: Braun Intertec revaluated the SDS sheets for the new project. The 
SDS notes: “that the ink supply contains an “aqueous ink formulation” and verified that the inks 
proposed are “water‐based” and do not contain any federal hazardous air pollutants (HAPs).  

Please feel free to contact me at 715‐931‐9855 or [e-mail] should you have 
any questions or if you require additional information regarding this application.  

Sincerely,  

BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION  

John B. Dague, PE      Jennifer Adams 
Senior Engineer       Principal Consultant  

Attachments: Highlighted R307‐351 
July 23, 2018 Letter to Utah DEQ  

CC: Lynn Grundvig – Deluxe (by email [e-mail]) 

R307. Environmental Quality, Air Quality.
R307-351. Graphic Arts.
R307-351-1. Purpose.
The purpose of R307-351 is to limit volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from graphic arts printing operations.
R307-351-2. Applicability.
(1) R307-351 applies to graphic arts printing operations located in Box Elder, Cache, Davis, Salt Lake, Utah, Tooele
and Weber counties.
(2) Before September 1, 2018, R307-351 applies to graphic arts printing operations that emit 2.7 tons or greater per
year of VOC emissions.
(3) Effective September 1, 2018, R307-351 shall apply to graphic arts printing operations that use a combined 450
gallons or more of all VOC-containing materials per year.
R307-351-3. Exemptions.
(1) The provisions of R307-351 shall not apply to graphic arts materials that have a VOC content of less than 25 g/L ,
minus water and exempt VOCs, as applied.
(2) A graphic arts printing operation may use up to 55 gallons of cleaning materials per year that do not comply with
the VOC composite vapor pressure requirement or the VOC content requirement in R307-351-5(4).
(3) The provisions of R307-351 shall not apply to medical devices and their packaging.
R307-351-4. Definitions.
The following additional definitions apply to R307-351:
"Alcohol" means any of the following compounds, when used as a fountain solution additive for offset lithographic
printing: ethanol, n-propanol, and isopropanol.
"Alcohol Substitute" means a non-alcohol additive that contains VOCs and is used in the fountain solution.
"Cleaning materials and solutions" means a liquid solvent or solution used to clean the operating surfaces of a printing
press and its parts. Cleaning materials and solutions include, but are not limited to blanket wash, roller wash, metering roller
cleaner, plate cleaner, impression cylinder washes, rubber rejuvenators, and other cleaners used for cleaning a press, press parts,
or to remove dried ink or coating from areas around the press.
"Blanket" means a synthetic rubber material that is wrapped around a cylinder used in offset lithography to transfer or
"offset" an image from an image carrier.
"Control system" means the combination of capture and control devices used to reduce emissions to the atmosphere.
"Flexographic printing" means the application of words, designs, and pictures to substrate by means of a roll printing
technique in which the pattern to be applied is raised above the printing roll and the image carrier is made of rubber or other
elastomeric materials.
"Fountain solution" means a mixture of water and other volatile and non-volatile chemicals and additives that wets the
non-image area of a lithographic printing plate so that the ink is maintained within the image areas.
"Graphic arts materials" means any inks, coatings, or adhesives, including added thinners or retarders, used in printing
or related coating or laminating processes.
"Graphic arts printing" means the application of words and images using the offset lithographic, letterpress,
rotogravure, or flexographic printing process.
"Heatset" means an offset lithographic printing or letterpress printing operation in which the ink solvents are vaporized
by passing the printed surface through a dryer.
"Letterpress printing" means a method where the image area is raised relative to the non-image area and the ink is
transferred to the substrate directly from the image surface.
"Non-heatset", also called coldset, means an offset lithographic printing or letterpress printing operation in which the
ink dries by oxidation and/or absorption into the substrate without use of heat from dryers. For the purposes of this rule, use of an
infrared heater or printing conducted using ultraviolet-cured or electron beam-cured inks is considered non-heatset.
"Medical device" means an instrument, apparatus, implement, machine, contrivance, implant, in vitro reagent or other
similar article including any component or accessory, that is intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions or in
the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, or is intended to affect the structure or any function of the body. For
the purpose of this rule, a medical device shall also include associated manufacturing or assembly apparatus.
"Offset lithographic printing" means a plane-o-graphic method in which the image and non-image areas are on the
same plane and the ink is offset from a plate to a rubber blanket, and then from the blanket to the substrate.
"Printing operation" means the application of words, designs, or pictures on a substrate. All units in a machine which
have both coating and printing units shall be considered as performing a printing operation.
"Rotogravure printing" means the application of words, designs, and pictures to a substrate by means of a roll printing
technique that involves a recessed image area in the form of cells.
"Web" means a continuous roll of substrate.
R307-351-5. VOC Content Limits.
(1) No owner or operator shall apply graphic arts materials with a VOC content greater than the amounts specified in
Table 1 or Table 2, unless the owner or operator uses an add-on control device as specified in R307-351-6.
TABLE 1
VOC Limits
(values in gram of VOC per liter, minus water and
exempt solvents (compounds not classified as VOC as defined in
R307-101-2)
Graphic Art Material VOC Limit (g/L)
Adhesive 150
Coating 300
Flexographic Fluorescent Ink 300
Flexographic Ink-Non-Porous Substrate 300
Flexographic Ink-Porous Substrate 225
Gravure Ink 300
Letterpress Ink 300
Offset Lithographic Ink 300
Heatset Web Offset Litographic ink 300
Heatset Web Offset Lithographic Ink:
Used on Book Presses and Presses
Less Than 22 Inches in Diameter 400
Used on Presses With Potential to Emit Less
Than 10 Tons/Year 400
(2) No owner or operator shall apply fountain solution, including additives with a VOC content greater than the
amounts specified in Table 2, unless the owner or operator uses an add-on control device as specified in R307-351-6.
TABLE 2
VOC Limits
(values in gram of VOC per liter, minus water and
exempt solvents (compounds not classified as VOC as defined in R307-101-2), as applied
Graphic Art Material VOC Limit (g/L)
Heatset Web-Fed
Alcohol without Refrigerated Chiller 16
Alcohol with Refrigerated Chiller 30
Alcohol Substitute 50
Sheet-Fed
Alcohol without Refrigerated Chiller 50
Alcohol with Refrigerated Chiller 85
Alcohol Substitute 50
Non-Heatset Web-Fed
All Alcohol Substitutes 50
(3) Alcohol containing fountain solutions shall not be used in non-heatset web-fed operations.
(4) Cleaning materials with a VOC composite vapor pressure of less than 10 mm Hg at 68 degrees Fahrenheit or
cleaning materials containing less than 50 percent VOC by weight shall be used.
R307-351-6. Add-on Controls Systems Operations.
(1) If an add-on control system is used, the owner or operator shall install and maintain the add-on emission control
system in accordance with the manufacturer recommendations.
(a) Control devices for individual heatset web offset lithographic printing presses and individual heatset web
letterpress printing press dryers that were installed prior to January 1, 2017, must maintain a 90% or greater control efficiency.
Similar control devices installed after January 1, 2017, must maintain a 95% or greater control efficiency.
(b) Control devices for individual flexographic printing presses and individual rotogravure printing presses shall
comply with a 90% or greater overall control efficiency.
(c) As an alternative to the control efficiency, the control device outlet concentration may be reduced to 20 ppmv as
hexane on a dry basis to accommodate situations where the inlet VOC concentration is low or there is no identifiable measurable
inlet. The control outlet concentration shall be determined using EPA Method 25A.
(d) The capture efficiency of a VOC emission control system's VOC collection device for flexographic and
rotogravure presses shall be determined according to EPA's "Guidelines for Determining Capture Efficiency," January 9, 1995
and 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix M, Methods 204-204F, as applicable.
(e) The capture efficiency of a VOC emission control system's VOC collection device for a heatset web offset press
shall be determined by demonstrating that the airflow in the dryer is negative to the surrounding pressroom during the initial test
using an air flow direction indicator, such as a smoke stick or aluminum ribbons, or differential pressure gauge.
(f) The control efficiency of a VOC emission control system's VOC control device shall be determined using test
methods in Appendices A-1, A-6, and A-7 to 40 CFR Part 60, for measuring flow rates, total gaseous organic concentrations, or
emissions of exempt compounds, as applicable.
(g) An alternative test method may be substituted for the preceding test methods after review and approval by the
EPA Administrator.
R307-351-7. Work Practices.
(1) Control techniques and work practices shall be implemented at all times to reduce VOC emissions. Control
techniques and work practices include:
(a) Keeping cleaning materials, used shop towels, and solvent wiping cloths in closed containers; and
(b) Minimizing spills of VOC-containing cleaning materials.
R307-351-8. Recordkeeping.
(1) The owner or operator shall maintain records of the following:
(a) Records that demonstrate compliance with R307-351. Records must include, but are not limited to, inventory and
product data sheets of all graphic arts materials and cleaning solutions subject to R307-351.
(b) If an add-on control device is used, records of key system parameters necessary to ensure compliance with R307-
351-6. Key system parameters include, but are not limited to, temperature, pressure, flow rates, and an inspection schedule. Key
inspection parameters shall be in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations, and as required to demonstrate that
operations provide continuous emission reduction from the source during all periods that the operations cause emissions from the
source.
(2) All records shall be maintained for a minimum of 2 years.
(3) Records shall be made available to the director upon request.
KEY: air pollution, graphic arts, VOC, printing operations
Date of Last Change: December 6, 2017
Notice of Continuation: February 1, 2023
Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2-104(1)(a)

VIA E‐MAIL: [e-mail]
July 23, 2018
Mr. Enqiang He
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84114
RE: Boiler Replacements – Deluxe Salt Lake Facility
Dear Enqiang,
Deluxe owns and operates a check printing facility located at 5820 Harold Gatty Dr, Salt Lake City, Utah. Deluxe
currently operates under Utah air quality approval order (AO) DAQE‐AN105100006‐17, issued January 9, 2017.
The Deluxe facility is located in Salt Lake County.

Salt Lake County is classified as attainment for all pollutants with exception to the following: (1) particulate
matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5) for which it has been recently classified as a serious
nonattainment area of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS); (2) For the 2015 Ozone Standard,
the Wasatch Front was recently designated as marginal nonattainment; (3) Salt Lake County is nonattainment
area for particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter (PM10); (4) Salt Lake City is a maintenance area for
carbon monoxide (CO); and (5) For sulfur dioxide (SO2) on December 20, 2017, EPA sent a letter to Governor
Herbert informing him that the agency concurs with Utah’s recommendations and is designating all areas of the
state attainment/unclassifiable for SO2.

Deluxe would like to provide written notification to the Utah Department of Air Quality (UDAQ), informing them
that Deluxe will replace the two existing natural gas fired boilers currently permitted in its AO Condition II.A.11
with two new 2.4 MMBtu/hr boilers. As a result of this replacement, Deluxe is proposing to reduce the permitted
natural gas usage by approximately 10%.

In accordance with Utah Administrative Code (UAC) R307‐401‐12, Deluxe is submitting this letter as a reduction
in air contaminants, as all estimated criteria pollutants are calculated as a reduction using U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) AP‐42 emission factors in Section 1.4, Natural Gas Combustion, July 1998. Deluxe is
submitting this notice prior to installation, which is scheduled for the fall of 2018. Deluxe is notifying UDAQ
ahead of installation since it is realizing a reduction in emissions, and this notice is required within 60 days of
installation as specified in R307‐401‐12 (2). Deluxe requests that UDAQ update its approval order to include the
project and make the emission reductions enforceable. Additional information regarding project details can be
seen below in the subsequent sections.
Deluxe – Reduction in Air Pollutants
July 23, 2018
Page 2

PROJECT SUMMARY
Current Boiler Operation
As regulated under Deluxe’s current AO Condition II.A.11, the boilers currently onsite are rated at 4 MMBtu/hr
each and have been used to provide for hot water needs and humidity control at the Salt Lake facility for many
years. Emissions for these units are limited by natural gas usage permitted under Condition II.B.2.b as 9,800
decatherms per rolling twelve months.
New Boiler Operation
In the next few months, Deluxe will replace the two existing 4 MMBtu/hr boilers with two new 2.4 MMBtu/hr
boilers. This replacement allows Deluxe to propose a decrease in air pollution through a reduction in permitted
natural gas consumption. A reduction in natural gas usage is based on the following:
Deluxe will no longer use the boilers to control humidity; and
The replacement units will have a more efficient design, as they are replacing 25 year old units.

Deluxe is proposing a reduction in natural gas usage of approximately 10%, lowering the natural gas usage from
the current permit limit of 9,800 decatherms per rolling 12‐months to 8,900 decatherms per rolling 12‐months.
Deluxe is proposing that the current AO be modified to reflect the new boiler capacities and natural gas usage
reductions in Conditions II.A.11 and II.B.2.b respectively.
EMISSION CALCULATION METHODOLOGY
Since the new and existing boilers have fuel consumption limits, the potential to emit (PTE) is based on the
permitted natural gas usage. The PTE for the existing boilers is based on the current permitted heat input of
9,800 decatherms per year. The PTE emissions for the new boilers were calculated based on the reduced heat
input of 8,900 decatherms per year that is proposed.

The PTE in tons per year (tpy) of each pollutant for the new and existing boilers was calculated by multiplying
the unit specific total potential natural gas usage (NGU) by an appropriate emission factor (EF). The
emission factors used for each pollutant can be found in Attachment 1. Emission rates for all pollutants can be
calculated using the following equation:
Annual Emission ሺtpyሻ ൌEF ൬ lb
MMscf൰ ∗NGU ൬MMscf
yr ൰ ∗൬ ton
2,000 lb൰

The ammonia (NH3) emission factors for the existing and replacement boilers is found in the EPA’s Final
Report titled Development and Selection of Ammonia Emission Factors. The remaining emission factors have
been determined per AP‐42 Section 1.4.

Since Deluxe is proposing approximately a 10% reduction in natural gas usage, the boiler replacements will
result in a reduction in PTE for nitrogen oxides (NOX), carbon monoxide (CO), particulate matter (PM, PM10, and
PM2.5), sulfur dioxide (SO2), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), lead, greenhouse gases (CO2e), NH3, and
hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). The reduction in the PTE associated with the boiler replacements has been
summarized in Table 1 and is detailed in Attachment 1. The specification sheet for the new boilers is included in
Attachment 2.
Deluxe – Reduction in Air Pollutants
July 23, 2018
Page 3

Table 1. PTE Reductions – Boiler Replacements
Pollutant Existing Boilers Proposed Boilers Proposed Decrease
in Emissions
(tpy) (tpy) (tpy)
NOx 4.80E‐01 4.36E‐01 4.41E‐02
CO 4.04E‐01 3.66E‐01 3.71E‐02
PM 3.65E‐02 3.32E‐02 3.35E‐03
PM10 3.65E‐02 3.32E‐02 3.35E‐03
PM2.5 3.65E‐02 3.32E‐02 3.35E‐03
SO2 2.88E‐03 2.62E‐03 2.65E‐04
VOC 2.64E‐02 2.40E‐02 2.43E‐03
Lead 2.40E‐06 2.18E‐06 2.21E‐07
NH3 1.54E‐02 1.40E‐02 1.41E‐03
CO2e 576.43 523.5 52.94
HAPs 9.07E‐03 8.24E‐03 8.33E‐04

As represented by the comparison of the emission rates for the existing and proposed boilers, the new boilers
will result in an actual decrease in emissions.
SUMMARY
Due to the overall reduction in PTE for all criteria pollutants and HAPs, Deluxe would like to notify the state of
the boiler replacements as a reduction in emissions. The boilers and fuel usage limits are currently permitted in
Conditions II.A.11 and II.B.2.b, respectively, of the current AO for the Salt Lake facility. Deluxe is requesting that
UDAQ update their current AO to reflect the change in the rated capacities and fuel consumption limit.
Additionally, Deluxe would like to update the site‐wide PTE to reflect the changes associated with the boiler
replacements, which are summarized in Table 1 and detailed in Attachment 1.
If you have any questions regarding information associated with the boiler replacements, do not hesitate to
contact myself or Chantelle Russell at Trinity Consultants; (805) 444‐8980.
Regards,

Randall Finley 
Director of Manufacturing Operations
Deluxe Manufacturing
5820 Harold Gatty Dr. | Salt Lake City, UT 84116
(801) 238‐3839 (work) | (801) 995‐5087 (cell)
www.deluxe.com

Attachment 1
Potential to Emit – Replacement Boilers

Boiler Calculation Updates
Table 1. Boiler Parameters
Parameter Value Unit
Exsisting Boilers Heat Input1 4.000 MMBtu/hr
Number of Exsisting Boilers1 2‐‐
9,800 Decatherms/yr
9,800 MMbtu/yr
Equivalent Gas Hours3 1,225 hr/yr
Proposed Boilers Heat Input 2.400 MMBtu/hr
Number of Proposed Boilers 2 MMBtu/hr
Proposed Heat Input4 8,900 MMBtu/yr
Equivalent Gas Hours 1,854 hr/yr
Natural Gas Heating Value (HHV)5 1,020 MMBtu/MMscf
2. 1 decatherm = 1 MMbtu
3. Assumed that the natural gas usage limit would not change.
4. Deluxe is proposing to reduce natural gas usage by 10%.
Table 2. Criteria & GHG Emissions
(lb/hr) (tpy) (lb/hr) (tpy) (lb/hr) (tpy)
NOx 100 lb/MMscf 0.7843 0.4804 0.4706 4.36E‐01 0.3137 4.41E‐02
CO 84 lb/MMscf 0.6588 0.4035 0.3953 3.66E‐01 0.2635 3.71E‐02
PM 7.6 lb/MMscf 0.05961 0.03651 0.03576 3.32E‐02 0.02384 3.35E‐03
PM10 7.6 lb/MMscf 0.05961 0.03651 0.03576 3.32E‐02 0.02384 3.35E‐03
PM2.5 7.6 lb/MMscf 0.05961 0.03651 0.03576 3.32E‐02 0.02384 3.35E‐03
SO2 0.6 lb/MMscf 4.71E‐03 2.88E‐03 2.82E‐03 2.62E‐03 1.88E‐03 2.65E‐04
VOC 5.5 lb/MMscf 0.04314 0.02642 0.02588 2.40E‐02 0.01725 2.43E‐03
Lead 0.0005 lb/MMscf 3.92E‐06 2.40E‐06 2.35E‐06 2.18E‐06 1.57E‐06 2.21E‐07
NH3 3.2 lb/MMscf 2.51E‐02 1.54E‐02 1.51E‐02 1.40E‐02 1.00E‐02 1.41E‐03
CO2 116.98 lb/MMBtu 935.82 573.19 561.49 520.55 374.33 52.64
N2O 2.2E‐04 lb/MMBtu 0.00 1.08E‐03 1.06E‐03 9.81E‐04 7.05E‐04 9.92E‐05
CH4 2.20E‐03 lb/MMBtu 0.02 1.08E‐02 1.06E‐02 9.81E‐03 7.05E‐03 9.92E‐04
CO2e 117.64 lb/MMBtu 941.12 576.43 564.67 523.50 376.45 52.94
2. Emission factor for NH3 determined by EPA's Development and Selection of Ammonia Emission Factors final report.
Proposed Decrease in
Emissions
1. Emission factors determined by AP‐42 Section 1.4.
Exisitng Boilers
Proposed Boilers
Permitted Heat Input2
General Information
Existing BoilersPollutantEmission Factor1,2,3,4
1. Per DAQE‐AN105100006‐17 Condition II.A.11
5. HHV obtained from AP‐42, footnote a of Table 1.4‐1
Proposed Boilers
3. Emission factors for greenhouse gas components calculated from 40 CFR Part 98, Subpart C, Tables C‐1 and C‐
4. Emission factor for greenhouse gases calculated from 40 CFR Part 98, Subpart C, Tables C‐1 and C‐2, using the Global
Warming Potentials provided in Subpart A, Table A‐1.
Deluxe Manufacturing Page 1 of 2 Trinity Consultants
Boiler Calculation Updates
Table 3. HAPs Emissions
(lb/hr) (tpy) (lb/hr) (tpy) (lb/hr) (tpy)
2‐Methylnaphthalene 2.40E‐05 lb/MMscf 1.88E‐07 1.15E‐07 1.13E‐07 1.05E‐07 7.53E‐08 1.06E‐08
3‐Methylchloranthrene 1.80E‐06 lb/MMscf 1.41E‐08 8.65E‐09 8.47E‐09 7.85E‐09 5.65E‐09 7.94E‐10
7,12‐Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene 1.60E‐05 lb/MMscf 1.25E‐07 7.69E‐08 7.53E‐08 6.98E‐08 5.02E‐08 7.06E‐09
Acenaphthene 1.80E‐06 lb/MMscf 1.41E‐08 8.65E‐09 8.47E‐09 7.85E‐09 5.65E‐09 7.94E‐10
Acenaphthylene 1.80E‐06 lb/MMscf 1.41E‐08 8.65E‐09 8.47E‐09 7.85E‐09 5.65E‐09 7.94E‐10
Anthracene 2.40E‐06 lb/MMscf 1.88E‐08 1.15E‐08 1.13E‐08 1.05E‐08 7.53E‐09 1.06E‐09
Benz(a)anthracene 1.80E‐06 lb/MMscf 1.41E‐08 8.65E‐09 8.47E‐09 7.85E‐09 5.65E‐09 7.94E‐10
Benzene 2.10E‐03 lb/MMscf 1.65E‐05 1.01E‐05 9.88E‐06 9.16E‐06 6.59E‐06 9.26E‐07
Benzo(a)pyrene 1.20E‐06 lb/MMscf 9.41E‐09 5.76E‐09 5.65E‐09 5.24E‐09 3.76E‐09 5.29E‐10
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1.80E‐06 lb/MMscf 1.41E‐08 8.65E‐09 8.47E‐09 7.85E‐09 5.65E‐09 7.94E‐10
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1.20E‐06 lb/MMscf 9.41E‐09 5.76E‐09 5.65E‐09 5.24E‐09 3.76E‐09 5.29E‐10
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1.80E‐06 lb/MMscf 1.41E‐08 8.65E‐09 8.47E‐09 7.85E‐09 5.65E‐09 7.94E‐10
Chrysene 1.80E‐06 lb/MMscf 1.41E‐08 8.65E‐09 8.47E‐09 7.85E‐09 5.65E‐09 7.94E‐10
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 1.20E‐06 lb/MMscf 9.41E‐09 5.76E‐09 5.65E‐09 5.24E‐09 3.76E‐09 5.29E‐10
Dichlorobenzene 1.20E‐03 lb/MMscf 9.41E‐06 5.76E‐06 5.65E‐06 5.24E‐06 3.76E‐06 5.29E‐07
Fluoranthene 3.00E‐06 lb/MMscf 2.35E‐08 1.44E‐08 1.41E‐08 1.31E‐08 9.41E‐09 1.32E‐09
Fluorene 2.80E‐06 lb/MMscf 2.20E‐08 1.35E‐08 1.32E‐08 1.22E‐08 8.78E‐09 1.24E‐09
Formaldehyde 7.50E‐02 lb/MMscf 5.88E‐04 3.60E‐04 3.53E‐04 3.27E‐04 2.35E‐04 3.31E‐05
Hexane 1.80E+00 lb/MMscf 1.41E‐02 8.65E‐03 8.47E‐03 7.85E‐03 5.65E‐03 7.94E‐04
Indeno(1,2,3‐cd)pyrene 1.80E‐06 lb/MMscf 1.41E‐08 8.65E‐09 8.47E‐09 7.85E‐09 5.65E‐09 7.94E‐10
Naphthalene 6.10E‐04 lb/MMscf 4.78E‐06 2.93E‐06 2.87E‐06 2.66E‐06 1.91E‐06 2.69E‐07
Phenanathrene 1.70E‐05 lb/MMscf 1.33E‐07 8.17E‐08 8.00E‐08 7.42E‐08 5.33E‐08 7.50E‐09
Pyrene 5.00E‐06 lb/MMscf 3.92E‐08 2.40E‐08 2.35E‐08 2.18E‐08 1.57E‐08 2.21E‐09
Toluene 3.40E‐03 lb/MMscf 2.67E‐05 1.63E‐05 1.60E‐05 1.48E‐05 1.07E‐05 1.50E‐06
Arsenic 2.00E‐04 lb/MMscf 1.57E‐06 9.61E‐07 9.41E‐07 8.73E‐07 6.27E‐07 8.82E‐08
Beryllium 1.20E‐05 lb/MMscf 9.41E‐08 5.76E‐08 5.65E‐08 5.24E‐08 3.76E‐08 5.29E‐09
Cadmium 1.10E‐03 lb/MMscf 8.63E‐06 5.28E‐06 5.18E‐06 4.80E‐06 3.45E‐06 4.85E‐07
Chromium 1.40E‐03 lb/MMscf 1.10E‐05 6.73E‐06 6.59E‐06 6.11E‐06 4.39E‐06 6.18E‐07
Cobalt 8.40E‐05 lb/MMscf 6.59E‐07 4.04E‐07 3.95E‐07 3.66E‐07 2.64E‐07 3.71E‐08
Lead 5.00E‐04 lb/MMscf 3.92E‐06 2.40E‐06 2.35E‐06 2.18E‐06 1.57E‐06 2.21E‐07
Manganese 3.80E‐04 lb/MMscf 2.98E‐06 1.83E‐06 1.79E‐06 1.66E‐06 1.19E‐06 1.68E‐07
Mercury 2.60E‐04 lb/MMscf 2.04E‐06 1.25E‐06 1.22E‐06 1.13E‐06 8.16E‐07 1.15E‐07
Nickel 2.10E‐03 lb/MMscf 1.65E‐05 1.01E‐05 9.88E‐06 9.16E‐06 6.59E‐06 9.26E‐07
Selenium 2.40E‐05 lb/MMscf 1.88E‐07 1.15E‐07 1.13E‐07 1.05E‐07 7.53E‐08 1.06E‐08
1.41E‐02 8.65E‐03 8.47E‐03 7.85E‐03 5.65E‐03 7.94E‐04
1.48E‐02 9.07E‐03 8.89E‐03 8.24E‐03 5.92E‐03 8.33E‐04
Pollutant Emission Factor1
Proposed Decrease in
Emissions
Max HAP
1. Lead emission factor from AP‐42 Table 1.4‐2. All other emission factors from AP‐42, Tables 1.4‐3 and 1.4‐4.
Total HAPs
Existing Boilers Proposed Boilers
Deluxe Manufacturing Page 2 of 2 Trinity Consultants

Attachment 2
Replacement Boiler Specification Sheet

1 1/4" (3.18)1 1/4" (3.18)1 1/2" (3.81)1 1/2" (3.81)15 PSI
15 PSI 6" FLG (15.24)6" FLG (15.24)6" FLG (15.24)6" FLG (15.24)
1 1/4" (3.18)
6" FLG (15.24)
1 1/2" (3.81)
6" FLG (15.24)
1 1/2" (3.81)
6" FLG (15.24)
LIFTING LUG
10
783 NORTH CHILI AVE
PERU, INDIANA 46970BRYAN BOILERS
ORDER NO.:
2134FORM NO.:
CLM SERIES FORCED DRAFT 15# & 150#
STEAM BOILERS (CLM120-CLM300)
REAR VIEW
PLAN VIEW
LEFT SIDE VIEW
EFFECTIVE DATE:
REPLACES:
FRONT VIEW
5. ALL FLANGES ARE 150# DESIGN
UNLESS NOTED.
TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE.
CERTIFIED DIMENSIONS.
CONSULT FACTORY FOR
SPECIFICATIONS & CONDITIONS.
VARY DEPENDING ON JOB
BURNER CONFIGURATION WILL
3. GAS TRAIN, CONTROL AND
2. LOCATION DIMENSIONS
INCHES. THOSE IN PARENTHESES
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN
4. DIMENSIONS ARE SUBJECT
ARE ALL ±1/2".
ARE CENTIMETERS.
NOTES:
X-BLOWDOWN
ORDER REV. NO.:
CONNECTION
12. FLAME OBSERVATION PORT
14. 1 1/2" (3.81) FEED
13. 1" NPT (2.54) SURFACE
1. FLOAT TYPE L.W.C.O.
3. RELIEF VALVE
A-LENGTH OVER JACKET
5. PRESSURE GAUGE
4. TUBE ACCESS PANEL
B-FLUE LOCATION
BOILER MODEL
2. FORCED DRAFT BURNER
9. OIL PUMP LOCATION
8. PRESSURETROLS
7. ELEC. ENCLOSURE
6. CLNOUT./INSP. OPNG-2"NPT(5.08)
C-FLUE DIAMETER
G-SUPPLY NOZZLE
9/16/03
16. WIDTH OVER MTG LUGS
15. PROBE TYPE AUX L.W.C.O
CLM120 CLM150 CLM210 CLM270
50 11/16"
(128.74)
25 11/32"
(64.37)
10"
(25.40)
59 11/16"
(151.60)
29 27/32"
(75.80)
12"
(30.48)
78 3/8"
(199.07)
39 3/16"
(99.53)
14"
(35.56)
97"
(246.38)
48 1/2"
(123.19)
16"
(40.64)
1" (2.54)1" (2.54)1" (2.54)1" (2.54)
10.
CONNECTION 150 PSI
150 PSI 3" NPT (7.62)3" NPT (7.62)3" NPT (7.62)3" NPT (7.62)
BLOWOFF CONNECTION
11. CLNOUT./INSP OPNG-1 1/2" (3.81)
SEE NOTE 5
D-LENGTH OVER BASE 43 1/8"
(109.53)
52 3/8"
(133.03)
70 7/8"
(180.02)
89 7/16"
(227.16)
H- BURNER EXTENSION CONSULT FACTORY FOR BURNER EXTENSION APPLICATIONS
2
1
9
7
15 8
5
X
G3
4
McDONNELLREMOTE SENSOR
H (91.44)
AREA
SERVICE
BURNER
36"
8 15/16"
(76.2)
30"
TUBE REMOVAL
MIN
CLEARANCE
16
12
11
6
13
61 5/8"
(156.52)
1" (2.54)
3" NPT (7.62)
14"
(35.56)
34 9/16"
(87.78)
69 1/8"
(175.57)
CLM180
80 1/8"
(203.51)
1" (2.54)
3" NPT (7.62)
(40.64)
16"
(111.76
44"
(223.52)
88"
CLM240
(251.61)
99 1/16"
(40.64)
1" (2.54)
3" NPT (7.62)
16"
106 5/8"
(270.82)
53 5/16
(135.41)
CLM300
38 3/8"
11 3/16"
B
A
8 15/16"
(201.76)
30 5/8"
(167.79)
D
35 3/8"
(163.83)
(82.86)
82 5/8"
C
64 1/2"
32 5/8"
(77.78)
66 1/16"
79 7/16"
(89.85)
(22.69)
(209.86)
(97.47)
(28.41)
(22.69)
LEVEL
WATER
14
K
15"270-300
12"120-240
MODEL K
7/22/03
MAX
17
17. ASME NAME PLATE
BRYAN BOILERS CLM SERIES FORCED DRAFT
STEAM BOILERS
Form # >> 2134
Date >> 9/2/2003
BOILER MODEL CLM120 CLM150 CLM180 CLM210 CLM240 CLM270 CLM300
MBH 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 2,400 2,700 3,000
(KW)351.6 439.5 527.4 615.3 703.2 791.1 879.0
MBH 960 1,200 1,440 1,680 1,920 2,160 2,400
(KW)281.3 351.6 421.9 492.2 562.6 632.9 703.2
HP 29 36 43 50 57 64 72
(KW)284 353 421 490 559 627 706
INCHES 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
(CM)2.54 2.54 2.54 2.54 2.54 2.54 2.54
NUMBER OF TUBES 36 45 54 63 72 81 90
PRESSURE VESSEL
GAL 66 79 93 106 120 133 147
(L)249.8 299.0 352.0 401.2 454.2 503.4 556.4
SQ FT 145 180 215 251 287 322 360
(SQ M)13.5 16.7 20.0 23.3 26.7 29.9 33.5
LBS/HR 990 1,237 1,485 1,732 1,979 2,227 2,474
(KG/HR)449.1 561.1 673.6 785.6 897.7 1,010.2 1,122.2
LBS 3,000 3,510 4,025 4,535 5,050 6,010 6,150
(KG)1,360.8 1,592.1 1,825.7 2,057.1 2,290.7 2,726.1 2,789.6
LBS 2,450 2,850 3,250 3,650 4,050 4,900 4,925
(KG)1,111.3 1,292.8 1,474.2 1,655.6 1,837.1 2,222.6 2,234.0
RELIEF VALVE TYPICAL - 15 PSIG (103.4 KPA)
QUANTITY (1) 13-214 (1) 13-214 (1) 13-214 (2) 13-214 (2) 13-214 (2) 13-214 (2) 13-214
INCHES 1½ x 2 1½ x 2 1½ x 2 1½ x 2 1½ x 2 1½ x 2 1½ x 2
(CM)3.81 x 5.08 3.81 x 5.08 3.81 x 5.09 3.81 x 5.08 3.81 x 5.09 3.81 x 5.08 3.81 x 5.09
MBH 1,900 1,900 1,900 3,800 3,800 3,800 3,800
(KW)556.7 556.7 556.7 1,113.4 1,113.4 1,113.4 1,113.4
RELIEF VALVE TYPICAL - 150 PSIG (1,034.2 KPA)
QUANTITY (1) 6021ED (1) 6021ED (1) 6021ED (1) 6021FE (1) 6021FE (1) 6021FE (1) 6021FE
INCHES 3/4 x 1 3/4 x 1 3/4 x 1 1 x 1¼1 x 1¼1 x 1¼1 x 1¼
(CM)1.90 x 2.54 1.90 x 2.54 1.90 x 2.55 2.54 x 3.17 2.54 x 3.18 2.54 x 3.17 2.54 x 3.18
MBH 1,651 1,651 1,651 2,583 2,583 2,583 2,583
(KW)483.7 483.7 483.7 756.8 756.8 756.8 756.8
CAPACITY-TOTAL
SHIPPING WEIGHT
SIZE
CAPACITY-TOTAL
SIZE
VOLUME
HEATING SURFACE
STEAM OUTPUT*
OPERATING WEIGHT
INPUT
OUTPUT*
BOILER HORSEPOWER
TUBE DIAMETER
* Output based on nominal 80% of input. Actual combustion efficiencies will vary and are fuel dependant.

Notice of Intent Application
Deluxe Manufacturing Operations

Prepared For

Deluxe Manufacturing Operations
5820 West Harold Gatty Drive
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84116

Prepared By:

Braun Intertec Corporation
June 2, 2023

Project B2300672

Table of Contents
Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 1
1.0 Source Identification Information .................................................................................................... 1
2.0 Process Description .......................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 HP 100K ............................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 HP 7900 ................................................................................................................................ 2
1.3 HP T250 ................................................................................................................................ 2
2.0 Emissions Calculations ...................................................................................................................... 2
3.0 State and Federal Requirements ...................................................................................................... 3
3.1 State Regulatory Applicability ............................................................................................. 3
3.2 Federal Regulatory Applicability .......................................................................................... 4
4.0 Permit Fee Basis ................................................................................................................................ 5

Appendices
Appendix A Utah Application Forms
Appendix B Emissions Calculations
Appendix C Equipment Specifications

Executive Summary

Deluxe Manufacturing Operations (Deluxe) owns and operates a check printing facility located at
5820 West Harold Gatty Drive in Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County Utah (Site). Deluxe operations have
historically been authorized by permit DAQE-AN105100007-18; however, the authorization was
voluntarily cancelled at the request of Deluxe because actual Site emissions were below the small
source threshold per R307-401-9. The Site currently operates under the Small Source Exemption. With
this Notice of Intent application Deluxe seeks to authorize the addition of two HP 100K Digital Offset
Presses, one HP 7900 Digital Offset Press, and one HP T250 Thermal Inkjet Printing Press.

The existing and proposed sources are detailed in table below.

Site Emission Sources
Source Number of Units New or Existing
HP 100K Digital Offset
Press 2 New
HP 7900 Digital Press 1 New
HP T250 Thermal Inkjet
Printing Press 1 New
Two Color Heidelberg GTO
52 Press 4 Existing
DCOP Press 12 Existing
Heidelberg 6-color
speedmaster printing
press
1 Existing
Ryobi Press 2 Existing
Natural Gas Boilers (2.4
MMBtu/hr) 2 Existing
Halm Jet Press 3 Existing
Numbering Machine
Cleaner/Oiler 2 Existing
Six Color Didde Press 1 Existing
Electrical UV Curing Units 6 Existing
Four-color Didde Press 1 Existing

Source Number of Units New or Existing
Four Color Heidelberg
GTO 52 Press 1 Existing
Two Color Super Jet Press 1 Existing
Support Folder 1 Existing
Collator 1 Existing
Kodak Plate Maker 1 Existing
Finishing Operations Area 1 Existing

The Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality (DAQ) forms demonstrating
compliance with the requirements are presented in Appendix A. Emissions calculations are presented in
Appendix B.

1.0 Source Identification Information

Deluxe Manufacturing Operations (Deluxe) is located at 5820 West Harold Gatty Drive in Salt Lake City,
Utah. The company contact is Lynn Grundvig, who may be reached at 435.830.0590 or
[e-mail].

The UTM coordinates are 412,890 m Easting, 4,515,000 m Northing, UTM Zone 12 UTM Datum: NAD27.
The SIC code for the facility is 2761 (manifold Business Forms).

The Site is located in Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, which is a Nonattainment Area (NAA) for
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for PM10, PM2.5, ozone, and sulfur dioxide (SO2), and is
a maintenance area for carbon monoxide (CO). The Site is a minor source under New Source Review
(NSR). New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP), and Maximum Available Control Technology (MACT) regulations do not apply to
this source. Title V of the 1990 Clean Air Act (CAA) does not apply to this source. Air emissions at the Site
are currently authorized by a Small Source Exemption.

2.0 Process Description

Sources previously authorized by AO DAQE-AN10510000718, dated October 10, 2018, have not changed
in specification or operation. New sources are discussed in detail in the subsections below. Process
information for new equipment is provided in Utah Division of Air Quality Form 3 in Appendix A.

2.1 HP 100K

The proposed HP Indigo 100K digital printing presses are sheet-fed digital presses. The presses will use
ink, imaging oil, imaging agent, and recycling agent, each of which contain volatile organic compounds
(VOCs). The usage rates of each of these materials is protected as confidential business information;
however, the vendor has specified a total hourly VOC emission rate of 1.5 pounds per hour (lb/hr) from
all materials based on testing under worst-case operating conditions. The HP 100K printing presses will
not use any fountain solution or cleaning materials.

Inks used in the HP 100K presses are supplied at a concentration of approximately 35% solids. While in
operation, the presses automatically add imaging oil to the inks to dilute them to approximately 3%
solids. The ink properties presented in the application forms are reflective of as-supplied materials

contents because the dilution of ink with imaging oil is an automated process, and because imaging oil is
captured and recycled by the press as discussed below.

The HP 100K presses utilize an onboard vapor hood and product recovery condenser, which recovers
and recycles volatilized imaging oil for reuse in the presses. VOC contained in consumed printing
materials is assumed to be emitted.

2.2 HP 7900

The proposed HP Indigo 7900 press is a digital offset printing press. This press will use imaging oil and
water-based inkjet inks, and will not use any fountain solution or cleaning materials. The HP 7900 press
utilizes an onboard vapor hood and product recovery condenser, which recovers and recycles volatilized
imaging oil for reuse in the press. VOC contained in consumed printing materials is assumed to be
emitted.

2.3 HP T250

The proposed HP T250 press is a thermal inkjet printing press. This press will use water-based inkjet inks
and will not use any fountain solution or cleaning materials. VOC contained in consumed printing
materials is assumed to be emitted.
The usage rates of each of these materials is protected as confidential business information; however,
the vendor has specified a total hourly VOC emission rate of 0.63 pounds per hour (lb/hr) from all
materials based on testing under worst-case operating conditions.

The Site operates 24 hours a day, five days per week, 52 weeks per year.

2.0 Emissions Calculations

The potential emission rates from the proposed printing operations are presented in this section by
pollutant type, along with descriptions of the calculation methods. Emission rates for the HP 100K
printing press were estimated based on emissions data provided by the manufacturer (1.5 lb VOC/hour)
and 6,240 hours of operation per year (24 hours per day, 5 days per week, 52 weeks/year). Emission
rates for the HP T250 printing press were estimated based on emissions data provided by the
manufacturer (0.63 lb VOC/hour) and 6,240 hours of operation per year. Emission rates for the HP 7900
Digital Offset press were estimated based on maximum ink usage rates and 6,240 hours of operation per
year.

Emissions from existing equipment is based on the actual emissions from two-year period which
precedes this application. The emissions calculations are provided in Appendix B, and the emissions
data provided by the vendor is included in Appendix C.

3.0 Best Available Control Technology (BACT ) Analysis

The HP 100K and HP 7900 presses utilize an onboard vapor hood and product recovery condenser,
which recovers and recycles volatilized imaging oil for reuse in the press. The HP 7900 and HP T250
presses utilize water-based inks with minimal VOC content. No individual press at the facility has a
potential to emit of 25 tons per year (tpy) or more of VOC, which is the recommended threshold for
requiring a control device for heatset web offset lithographic printing operations per Control Techniques
Guidelines for Offset Lithographic Printing and Letterpress Printing, EPA-453/R-06.

4.0 State and Federal Requirements

4.1 State Regulatory Applicability

This section discusses the following potentially applicable State of Utah regulations.

Utah Office of Administrative Rules – R307-107 General Requirements: Breakdowns
The Site will report breakdowns to the director within 24 hours of the incident.

Utah Office of Administrative Rules – R307-150 Emission Inventories
This section applies to stationary sources with actual emissions of 100 tons or more per year of SO2,
Deluxe does not exceed the 100 tons per year threshold for SO2 emissions and is not required to submit
an emissions inventory report.

Utah Office of Administrative Rules – R307-325 Ozone Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas:
General Requirements
This section states that no person shall allow or cause VOCs to be spilled, discarded, stored in open
containers, or handled in any other manner that would result in greater evaporation of VOCs than would
have if reasonably available control technology (RACT) had been applied. Deluxe currently complies with
this section and will continue to comply upon installation of new equipment.

Utah Office of Administrative Rules – R307-401 Permit: New and Modified Sources.
This application is in compliance with R307-401-5 Notice of Intent.

Utah Office of Administrative Rules – R307-403 Permits: New and Modified Sources in Nontattainment
Areas and Maintenance Areas
The requirements of R307-403 do not apply because the source is not a new major source or
modification.

Utah Office of Administrative Rules – R307-405 Permits: Major Sources in Attainment or Unclassified
Areas (PSD)
The requirements of R307-405 do not apply because the source is not a new major source or
modification.

Utah Office of Administrative Rules – R307-406 Permits: Visibility
The requirements of R307-406 do not apply because the source is not a new major source or
modification.

Utah Office of Administrative Rules – R307-410 Permits: Emissions Impact Analysis
The source is not required to conduct modeling of criteria pollutants because the emission are below
the thresholds contained in Table 1 of R307-410-4. [PLACE HOLDER for discussion of HAPs]

Utah Office of Administrative Rules – R307-420 Permits: Ozone Offset Requirements in Davis and Salt
Lake Counties
The requirements of R307-420 do not apply because the source is not a new major source or
modification and total VOC emissions are less than 50 tpy..

Utah Office of Administrative Rules – R307-421 Permits: PM10 Offset Requirements in Salt Lake and
Utah Counties
The requirements of R307-421 do not apply because the source is not a new major source or
modification and increase in NOx, SO2 and PM10 is less than 25 tpy combined.

4.2 Federal Regulatory Applicability

New Source Review (NSR) – 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 52
The Site is located in Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, which is a NAA for NAAQS PM10, PM2.5,
ozone, and SO2, and is a maintenance area for CO. The Site is a minor source for for Non-Attainment
(NA) NSR and the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) program. The proposed change does not
constitute construction of a major stationary source or major modification under NA NSR , or PSD
regulations.

New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) – 40 CFR Part 60
The Site does not have any affected sources subject to NSPS subparts in 40 CFR Part 60.

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) – 40 CFR Part 61
The Site is not subject to any applicable NESHAP subparts in 40 CFR Part 61.

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) – 40 CFR Part 63
The Site is not subject to any applicable NESHAP subparts in 40 CFR Part 63.
5.0 Permit Fee Basis
Deluxe will pre-pay the $2,700 fee for new minor sources with the submission of this application.

Appendix A

Utah Application Forms
Form 1 Date __________________
Notice of Intent (NOI) Application Checklist
Company __________________
Utah Division of Air Quality
New Source Review Section
Source Identification Information [R307-401-5]
1. Company name, mailing address, physical address and telephone number 
2. Company contact (Name, mailing address, and telephone number)
3.Name and contact of person submitting NOI application (if different than 2)
4.Source Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates 
5. Source Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code 
6.Area designation (attainment, maintenance, or nonattainment)
7.Federal/State requirement applicability (NAAQS, NSPS, MACT, SIP, etc.)
8.Source size determination (Major, Minor, PSD)
9. Current Approval Order(s) and/or Title V Permit numbers 
NOI Application Information: [R307-401]










N/A 
N/A 
A.Air quality analysis (air model, met data, background data, source impact analysis) N/A 
1.Detailed description of the project and source process
2.Discussion of fuels, raw materials, and products consumed/produced
3.Description of equipment used in the process and operating schedule
4.Description of changes to the process, production rates, etc.
5.Site plan of source with building dimensions, stack parameters, etc.
6.Best Available Control Technology (BACT) Analysis [R307-401-8]
A.BACT analysis for all new and modified equipment
7.Emissions Related Information: [R307-401-2(b)]
A.Emission calculations for each new/modified unit and site-wide
(Include PM10, PM2.5, NOx, SO2, CO, VOCs, HAPs, and GHGs)
B.References/assumptions, SDS, for each calculation and pollutant
C.All speciated HAP emissions (list in lbs/hr)
8.Emissions Impact Analysis – Approved Modeling Protocol [R307-410]
A.Composition and physical characteristics of effluent
(emission rates, temperature, volume, pollutant types and concentrations)
9.Nonattainment/Maintenance Areas – Major NSR/Minor (offsetting only) [R307-403]
A.NAAQS demonstration, Lowest Achievable Emission Rate, Offset requirements
B.Alternative site analysis, Major source ownership compliance certification
10.Major Sources in Attainment or Unclassified Areas (PSD) [R307-405, R307-406]
B.Visibility impact analysis, Class I area impact
11.Signature on Application
N/A 
Note: The Division of Air Quality will not accept documents containing confidential information or data.
Documents containing confidential information will be returned to the Source submitting the application.
1 of 1
Form 2 Date ____________
Company Information/Notice of Intent (NOI)
Utah Division of Air Quality
New Source Review Section
Application for: □ Initial Approval Order □Approval Order Modification
General Owner and Source Information
1.Company name and mailing address:
____________________________
____________________________
____________________________
Phone No.: ( )
Fax No.: ( )
2.Company** contact for environmental matters:
____________________________
Phone no.: ( )
Email: _______________________
** Company contact only; consultant or independent contractor contact
information can be provided in a cover letter
3.Source name and physical address (if different from
above):____________________________
____________________________
____________________________
Phone no.: ( )
Fax no.: ( )
4.Source Property Universal Transverse Mercator
coordinates (UTM), including System and Datum:
UTM:_________________________
X:____________________________
Y:____________________________
5.The Source is located in:__________________ County 6.Standard Industrial Classification Code (SIC)
__ __ __ __
7.If request for modification, AO# to be modified: DAQE #__________________ DATED: ____/____/____
8.Brief (50 words or less) description of process.
Electronic NOI
9.A complete and accurate electronic NOI submitted to DAQ Permitting Mangers Jon Black ([e-mail]) or Alan
Humpherys ([e-mail]) can expedite review process. Please mark application type.
Hard Copy Submittal Electronic Copy Submittal □ Both
Authorization/Signature
I hereby certify that the information and data submitted in and with this application is completely true, accurate and
complete, based on reasonable inquiry made by me and to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Signature: Title:
_______________________________________
Name (Type or print)
Telephone Number:
( )
Email:
Date:
Page 1 of 1
Form 3 Company____________________
Process Information Site________________________
Utah Division of Air Quality
New Source Review Section
Process Information - For New Permit ONLY
1.Name of process:2.End product of this process:
3.Process Description*:
Operating Data
4.Maximum operating schedule:
__________ hrs/day
__________days/week
__________weeks/year
5.Percent annual production by quarter:
Winter ________ Spring _______
Summer ________ Fall _______
6.Maximum Hourly production (indicate units.):
_____________
7.Maximum annual production (indicate units):
________________
8.Type of operation:
Continuous Batch Intermittent
9.If batch, indicate minutes per cycle ________
Minutes between cycles ________
10. Materials and quantities used in process.*
Material Maximum Annual Quantity (indicate units)
11.Process-Emitting Units with pollution control equipment*
Emitting Unit(s) Capacity(s) Manufacture Date(s)
*If additional space is required, please create a spreadsheet or Word processing document and attach to form.
Page 1 of 1
Company___________________________
Site _____________________________
Form 5
Emissions Information
Criteria/GHGs/ HAP’s
Utah Division of Air Quality
New Source Review Section
Potential to Emit* Criteria Pollutants & GHGs
Criteria Pollutants Permitted Emissions
(tons/yr)
Emissions Increases
(tons/yr)
Proposed Emissions
(tons/yr)
PM10 Total
PM10 Fugitive
PM2.5
NOx
SO2
CO
VOC
VOC Fugitive
NH3
Greenhouse Gases CO2e CO2e CO2e
CO2
CH4
N2O
HFCs
PFCs
SF6
Total CO2e
*Potential to emit to include pollution control equipment as defined by R307-401-2.
Hazardous Air Pollutants** (**Defined in Section 112(b) of the Clean Air Act )
Hazardous Air
Pollutant***
Permitted Emissions
(tons/yr)
Emission Increase
(tons/yr)
Proposed
Emission (tons/yr)
Emission Increase
(lbs/hr)
Total HAP
*** Use additional sheets for pollutants if needed

Appendix B

Emissions Calculations
Table 1
Emissions Calculations
Deluxe Manufacturing Operations
Salt Lake City Facility
5820 West Harold Gatty Drive
Salt Lake City, Utah 84116
Project B2300672
Actual Operating Hours 6,240 hrs/year
lb/hour tons/yr lb/hour1 tons/yr lb/hour1 tons/yr lb/hour1 tons/yr lb/hour1 tons/yr
5.05 15.75 0.00 0.001 0.04 0.11 0.01 0.02 0.06 0.18
lb/hour tons/yr
Electro ink
Imaging Oil
Imaging Agent
Recycling Agent
Notes:
1Emissions information provided by manufacturer.
lb/hour tons/yr
Electro ink
Imaging Oil
Imaging Agent
Recycling Agent
Notes:
1Emissions information provided by manufacturer.
lb/hour tons/yr
Electro ink
Imaging Oil
Imaging Agent
Recycling Agent
Notes:
4.681.5
Proposed Site Wide Emissions
VOC SO2 NOx PM CO
Increased Emissions 1
Equipment
# of
Equipment Material
VOM Emissions
HP 7900 Digital
Printing Press 1 1.50 4.68
T250 Thermal Inkjet
Printing Press 1 0.63 1.97
Increased Emissions 1
Equipment
# of
Equipment Material
VOM Emissions
HP 100K Digital
Printing Press 2
Increased Emissions 1
Equipment
# of
Equipment Material
VOM Emissions
Table 1
Emissions Calculations
Deluxe Manufacturing Operations
Salt Lake City Facility
5820 West Harold Gatty Drive
Salt Lake City, Utah 84116
Project B2300672
lb/hour1 tons/yr
5
19
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
3
3
1
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Notes
1Hourly emissions calculated by averaging annual emissions over year.
3Emissions represent the highest rolling 12 month average from previous two years of operations of listed eqiupment.
lb/hour tons/yr1 lb/hour tons/yr1 lb/hour tons/yr1 lb/hour tons/yr1 lb/hour tons/yr1
2 0.01 0.02 4.22E-04 0.001 0.04 0.11 3.87E-03 0.01 0.06 0.18
1Annual emissions calculated using max monthly emissions over last 2 years.
Two Color Heidelberg MOZ Press
Ofcon Continuous Press
DCOP Press
Two Color Heidelberg GTO 52 Press
Equipment
Ryobi Press
Heath Pak-to-Pak Printing Press
Continous Heath Press
Heidelberg 6-color speedmaster
printing press
Concept Press
Current Emissions, Printing Operations 2
# of Equipment
VOM Emissions
1The HP 7900 is a smaller version of the HP100K, and both are HP Indigo Digital
printers. Emissions for the 7900 are conservativley assumed to be equal to the
provided emissions for the 100k.
1.41 4.41
Equipment # of Equipment
PM
Finishing Operations Area
Kodak Plate Maker
Collator
Four-color Didde Press
Support Folder
Two Color Super Jet Press
Four Color Heidelberg GTO 52 Press
Electrical UV Curing Units
Six Color Didde Press
Numbering Machine Cleaner/Oiler
Halm Jet Press
VOC CO
Current Emissions, Boilers
Natural Gas Boilers
SO2 NOx

Appendix C

Equipment Specifications

LOS ANGELES/ORANGE COUNTY/RIVERSIDE/VENTURA/FRESNO/OAKLAND/BAKERSFIELD
31726 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 218 ▼ San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 ▼ Tel: [phone] ▼ Fax: [phone]

June 24, 2021
Lynn Grundvig
Deluxe Corporation
Senior Environmental Safety and Health Specialist
5820 W Harold Gatty Drive
Salt Lake City UT 84116
Direct: 801-238-3819
Cell: 435-830-0590
E-mail: [e-mail]

Subject: Emissions Profile for HP Indigo 100K Digital Press

Dear Lynn Grunvig:
The following information is being provided by Yorke Engineering LLC (Yorke) working on
behalf of HP Indigo Ltd. (HP Indigo), which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of HP Inc. Please be
advised that this is subject to a Confidential Disclosure Agreement (CDA) between HP Indigo and
Deluxe Corporation (Deluxe). The information provided is intended to assist Deluxe in evaluating
the HP Indigo 100K Digital Press. Specifically volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions
estimates to support air quality permitting at the Salt Lake City facility. The information in this
letter can be provided to the Utah Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). Please note,
however, this information is based on a mass balance emission test document that contains HP
Indigo Confidential Business Information. Providing specific test data to the Utah DEQ if
necessary, would require Trade Secret protection.
It is the responsibility of Deluxe and others working on behalf of Deluxe, to provide complete
emissions reporting and permit applications when required in accordance with governing rules,
regulations, and policies. This may require consideration of other air pollutant emission sources
at the location where the digital press is installed.
This letter summarizes the operation of the HP Indigo 100K Digital Press, which is different from
conventional printing and may help with interpretation of air quality rules and compliance
procedures that reflect conventional printing technologies. Then, information is provided on VOC
emissions from the HP Indigo 100K from the test data.
SUMMARY – HP INDIGO 100K
The HP Indigo 100K is a sheet-fed digital press. The press operates by producing images by laying
down impressions of each color separately on the photo imaging plate. A maximum of four colors
are used at a time which typically are cyan (C), magenta (M), yellow (Y) and black (K). The HP
Indigo 100K digital press operates at a constant 18,000 impressions per hour printing 4,500 B2
CMYK single-sided sheets per hour (750 mm x 530 mm), a 30% increase over the fourth
generation HP Indigo 12000.
The press functions by using ElectroInk consisting of color pigments, binders, and other additives
suspended in a non-polar oil (Imaging Oil) which is critical to the operation of the Indigo digital
Lynn Grundvig, Deluxe
June 24, 2021
Page 2 of 5

press. The ink in the cartridges contain approximately 35% solids with the remainder comprised
of Imaging Oil. ElectroInks are diluted to 3% solids in the ink tanks through the addition of
recovered Imaging Oil, supplemented by new Imaging Oil if needed. Imaging Oil is a non-polar,
narrow cut petroleum distillate with a low vapor pressure of 0.3 mm Hg at 20°C and an initial
boiling point of 372oF. This material is specifically used for its dielectric properties.
After digitally writing an electrostatic image for each color separation on the photo imaging plate,
the Binary Image Developer (BID) applies the ink particles suspended in Imaging Oil from the ink
tanks. Imaging Oil is flashed off via external heating elements when the image is transferred to a
heated blanket roller. The evaporated Imaging Oil is collected by an internal vapor hood and
routed to an onboard condenser to recover the material for reuse on the press. The ink resins
coalesce into a thin, cohesive ink film on the blanket roller, and when the image is then transferred
to the print media, the inks immediately solidify and bond to the lower-temperature substrate.
Excess Imaging Oil that cannot be reused on the press is collected and placed by press operators
into suitable containers for appropriate transfer off site as a waste stream. Although most Imaging
Oil evaporated is recovered, a small fraction of the Imaging Oil routed to the BID is emitted as a
volatile organic compound (VOC), which is considered an air pollutant because it is an ozone
precursor that contributes to the formation of photochemical smog, monitored as ambient ozone
concentrations.
Since digital printers lay down impressions of one color at a time, each color typically covers a
portion of the substrate. Print jobs may require low ink coverage for those with significant text or
high coverage for photo-based print jobs. Average coverage is always well below 100 percent,
since 100 percent coverage of each ink color would result in a solid black rectangle of no
commercial value.
The VOC material handing within the HP Indigo 100K is depicted in Figure 1.
AIR EMISSIONS – HP INDIGO 100K
HP Indigo has performed emissions testing over the past several years on some of their digital
press models by using a mass balance testing approach that was developed in concert with an
environmental consulting firm for use in supporting air permit applications. A mass balance
emissions test was performed on an HP Indigo 100K digital press by HP Indigo R&D engineers
from June 29 through July 6, 2020, at HP Indigo’s test center in Kyriat Gat, Israel.
The HP Indigo 100K is a sheet-fed digital press that produces images by laying down impressions
of each color separately on the photo imaging plate. Four colors are used at a time which typically
are cyan (C), magenta (M), yellow (Y) and black (K). The HP Indigo 100K digital press operates
at a constant 18,000 impressions per hour printing 4,500 B2 CMYK single-sided sheets per hour
(750 mm x 530 mm).
The inputs and outputs measured during testing of the HP Indigo 100K digital press is shown in
Figure 1. Emissions were estimated from measurements of all inlet liquid VOC materials minus
the total measured recovered liquid VOC materials.
Lynn Grundvig, Deluxe
June 24, 2021
Page 3 of 5

Figure 1: VOC Material Handling

Several test runs were made on the HP Indigo 100K with varying ink coverages on the page.
Maximum VOC emissions were estimated from an operating scenario that used high ink coverage.
The high coverage scenario was determined from review of customer data by HP Indigo where
about 98.5% of all print jobs are at or below that level. In other mass balance testing, such an
operating scenario resulted in the highest hourly VOC. The test was run for about 3 hours with all
the VOC inputs and outputs carefully weighed or measured volumetrically. The press remained
operating over the testing period.
The information in Table 1 summarizes the air emissions estimates for the HP Indigo 100K. This
assumes that the digital press is installed and operated in accordance with the instructions provided
by HP Indigo, which include: operating with press doors closed; providing chilled water to the
press at the required flow rate and temperature; and providing adequate ventilation as described in
the site preparation manual for this press.
Lynn Grundvig, Deluxe
June 24, 2021
Page 4 of 5

Table 1: Air Emissions for the HP Indigo 100K Digital Press
Pollutant: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) – an ozone precursor
Estimated Maximum
Emission Rate from
the Press:
1.50 pounds per hour (lbs./hr.)
36.00 pounds per day at 24 hours per day
13,140 pounds per year at 8,760 hours per year (no downtime)
(13,140 lbs./yr) / (2000 lbs./ton) = 6.57 tons per year
Basis: June-July 2020 Mass Balance Emission Test performed on HP Indigo 100K
press at maximum ink coverage seen on customer data - this was based on
laydown of four-process color separations at maximum ink coverage seen on
customer jobs.
Toxic Emissions: The ElectroInks, Imaging Oils, Imaging Agent and Recycling Agent do not
contain any materials that contain or would cause emission of a toxic air
contaminant (TAC) or hazardous air pollutant (HAP).
On Board Capture
and Control:
The mass balance emission test on the 100K press documented that at least
86.5 percent of the VOCs were captured for reuse in the machine or collected
for liquid waste disposal (if excess). The internal capture rate within the
condenser is in excess of 95 percent.
Estimated Annual
Raw Material
Usages:
177,180 pounds for HP ElectroInks, HP Imaging Agent, HP Recycling Agent
and Imaging Oil combined.
HP Imaging Oil – 90 gallons (maintenance uses only-estimated)1
Additional Notes: The emissions and material usage estimates assume continuous operation
(8,760 hrs/year) at a high coverage scenario. Digital presses typically require
down times for maintenance, replacement of consumables, clearing paper jams,
etc., and less than 100% continuous operation is maintained in practice.
To account for such downtimes or other reduced operations, the estimated
emissions and raw materials used can be prorated for actual operating times.
However, a permit application may be needed to increase usage beyond a
permitted (or exempted) level, so any such limitations agreed to should be a
carefully considered business decision.
Others have permitted such presses based on the potential continuous operation
of 24 hours per day and 8,760 hours per year. Where such emissions are within
BACT or other applicable thresholds contained in the federal and state air
permitting jurisdiction, it provides a conservative emissions estimate that is not
likely to restrict future operations on a short term or annual basis. Thus, this
maximum emission scenario is a preferred approach in many circumstances.

1 May differ by individual customer practices; to be adjusted accordingly.
Lynn Grundvig, Deluxe
June 24, 2021
Page 5 of 5

CONCLUSION
Should you have any additional questions on the above, please contact me at [phone] or
Michael Dudasko at [phone] or through the email addresses below.

Sincerely,

John Koehler, Sc.D.
Senior Engineer
Yorke Engineering, LLC
2880 Zanker Road, Suite 203
San Jose, CA 95134
Email: [e-mail]

cc. Dr. Jeffrey Belson, HP Indigo Ltd.
Eve Alcoulombre, HP Indigo, Ltd.
Michael Dudasko, Yorke Engineering, LLC, [e-mail]