DAQ-2024-005024

1
DAQC-072-24
Site ID 10414 (B4)

MEMORANDUM

TO: STACK TEST FILE – CENTRAL VALLEY WATER RECLAMATION

THROUGH: Harold Burge, Major Source Compliance Section Manager

FROM: Paul Morris, Environmental Scientist

DATE: January 25, 2024

SUBJECT: Source: Jenbacher Engine 2 and 4
Contact: Brian Mansell: [phone]
Location: 800 West Central Valley Road
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Test Contractor: Alliance Technical Group, LLC
FRS ID#: UT0000004903500191
Permit#: 3500191001, dated March 16, 2020, Last Revised September 9,
2021
Action Code: TR
Subject: Review of Stack Test Report Received January 11, 2024

On January 11, 2024, DAQ received a test report for Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility’s
Jenbacher engine 2 and 4. Testing was performed on December 14-15, 2024, to determine compliance
with permit condition II.B.2.c. The DAQ-calculated test results are:

Source Test Date Test Method Pollutant Result Limit

Jenbacher 2 12/15/2023 RM 320 NOx 0.40 g/hp-hr 0.55 g/hp-hr

CO 1.89 g/hp-hr 2.50 g/hp-hr

VOC 0.16 g/hp-hr 0.7 g/hp-hr

NMHC 0.27 g/hp-hr 0.3 g/hp-hr

Jenbacher 4 12/14/2023 RM 320 NOx 0.40 g/hp-hr 0.55 g/hp-hr

CO 1.71 g/hp-hr 2.50 g/hp-hr

VOC 0.14 g/hp-hr 0.7 g/hp-hr

NMHC 0.24 g/hp-hr 0.3 g/hp-hr

6 , 3
2
DEVIATIONS: None reported.

CONCLUSION: The test report appears to be acceptable.

RECOMMENDATION: Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility’s Jenbacher engine 2 and 4
should be considered to have been in compliance with the applicable
limits at the time of the test.

HPV: No

ATTACHMENTS: Test report dated January 8, 2024, Email dated January 24, 2024, DAQ
Spreadsheets

:""D
UJ"
Central Valley Water
Recla mation
Fa ci lity
i rl. | ? I l\ !/l
'i i,",i_ Ql.iALlTY
I
,
Board Members
Debra Armstrong, Chair
Don Russell, Vice Chair
Wesley Fisher
Brett Hales
LeAnne Huff
Keith Lord
JeffMonson
General Manager
Phillip Heck, Ph.D., P.E.
.r 1
,!
tr'):.i oF
IIr 2|Jr.r i I-,rl
A:R Ol]ALlTY_l
January 8,2024
Mr. Bryce Bird, Director
Division of Air Quality
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
P.O. Box 144820
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4820
Subject: Stack Emissions Testing Results - Jenbacher 2 & 4
Dear Mr. Bird:
In accordance with the Approval Order dated luly2,202l, and our Title V permit, we procured a
third-party testing contractor to conduct performance testing of our Jenbacher cogeneration
engine 2 & 4 (Jenbacher #2 & #4) prior to reaching the 8,760-hour limit since the previous
emissions testing. The testing protocol was submitted via email to Harold Burge (DAQ, Major
Source Compliance Manager) for approval on October 30,2023. A hard copy was also submitted
to DAQ. A letter was received from Joseph Randolph (DAQ, Environmental Scientist), dated
November 20,2023, indicating approval of the testing protocol. The testing took place on
December 14-15,2023.
The final report from that testing is attached to this letter. I hereby certiff that to the best of my
knowledge:
A.
B,
Testing was conducted while the source was operating at the rate and/or conditions
specified in the applicable approval order, operating permit, or federal regulation.
During testing, the source combusted fuels, used raw materials, and maintained
process conditions representative of normal operations, and operated under such other
relevant conditions specified by the Director.
Based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements and
information contained in the report are true, accurate, and complete.
C.
Should you have any questions or comments please feel free to contact Bryan Mansell of my
office.
800 west central valley Road, Salt Lake city, uT 84119-3379 . [phone] . [phone]
Stack Emissions Testing Results - Jenbacher #2 & #4
January 8, 2024
Page 2 of2
Sincerely,
//r4./hft
Phillip Heck, Ph.D., P.E.
General Manager
cc: Harold Burge, Utah Division of Air Qualrty
Joe Randolph, Utah Division of Air Qualrty
Sharon Bwton, CVWRF
Zack VanWonner, CVWRF
Bryan Mansell, CVWRF
Attachment (l)
1. Engine Test Report - Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility -Jenbacher #2 &#4
Alialpe Tnsr Rrponr SuvrvraRy
Client Information / Test Location
Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility
Wastewater Treatment Plant
800 W Central Valley Road
Salt Lake city, uT 84119.3379
Source Information
Enginefunit ID:
Engine Make/1\4odel:
Jenbacher #2
GE Jenbacher Model JMS
612-F28F02 Generator
Engine
1322416
Compression Ignition
0l-0r-2017
2.509 HP
'-
" 'i-l::'r\r'.,'' ': (l:'
rii:-:rlt\ir ir;I]jxL_Gt JAt_lT_./
i
Enginp Serial Number:
pngirle Type:
Engirf Date of Manufacture:
Ensirle Ratinp:l"lt,
--"hrnt*t Nn.':'rr{)\ oF AtR o,rAt irEst
-023_430t
Reeu latorv Applicabilitv'
40 CFR 60, Subpart JJJJ
DAQE-ANr041400t5-21
CORPORATE OFFICE
p. il,:,t, r :ii :-lr ;
r j t, , .\ i,r l
lun No.Run I Run 2 Run 3 Average
)ate nn5n3 12lt5n3 wEn3
Ingine Load, To *96 96 96 96
{itrogen Oxides Data
Em ission Rate, g/bHP-hr
Emission Limit, g/bHP-hr
Percent of Lim it, 7o
0.41 0.41 0.38 0.40
0.55
72
arbon Monoxide Data
Emission Rare. g/bHP-hr
Emission Limit, g/bHP-hr
Percent of Limit, 7o
1.94 t.88 1.86 r.89
2.5
76
/olatile Organic Compounds Data
Emission Factor, g/bHP-hr
Emission Limit, g/bHP-hr
Percent of Limit, 7o
0. l6 0.15 0. l6 0.r6
1.0
l6
\on-Methane Hydrocarbons Data
Emission Rate, g/bHP-hr
Em ission Limit, g/bHP-hr
Percent of Limit, 7o
0.28 0.27 0.27 0.27
0.3
9l
Vlethane Data
Emission Factor, g/bHP-hr 3.84 3.69 3.73 3.75
F.ormaldehyde Data
Emission Factor, g/bHP-hr 0.23 0.22 0.22 0.22
* Performance testing was conducted while the engine was operating at the highest achievable load at current site conditions.
AI Trsr Rnronr SuvrnnanyI i iliii{ICAI (ll:i()i"iP
Client Information / Test Location Source Information
Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility Enginefunit ID: Jenbacher #4
Wastewater Treatment Plant Engine Make/lvlodel: GE Jenbacher Model JMS
800 W Central Valley Road 612-F28F02 Generator
Salt Lake City, UT 84119-3379 Engine
Engine Serial Number: 1322446
Engine Type: Compression Ignition
Engine Date of Manufacture: 0l-01-2018
Engine Rating: 2,509 HP
Requlatorv Applicability Proiect No.
40 CFR60, SubpartJJJJ AST-2023-4301
Fta
DAOE-ANl04t400l5-21
lngine Load, To *96 96 96 96
{itrogen Oxides Data
Emission Rate, g/bHP-hr
Emission Limit, g/bHP-hr
Percent of Limit, 7o
0.44 0.42 0.33 0.39
0.55
72
arbon Monoxide Data
Emission Rate, g/bHP-hr
Emission Limit, g/bHP-hr
Percent of Limit. To
1.57 1.72 L84 r.7l
2.0
86
[olatile Organic Compounds Data
Emission Factor, g/bHP-hr
Emission Limit, g/bHP-hr
Percent of Limit,7o
0.13 0. l3 0.15 0. l4
1.0
l4
{on-Methane Hydrocarbons Data
Emission Rate, g/bHP-hr
Emission Limit, g/bHP-hr
Percent of Limit,o/o
0.22 0.24 0.27 0.24
0.3
81
Vlethane Data
Emission Factor, g/bHP-hr 3.00 3.38 3.82 3.40
Iormaldehyde Data
Emission Factor, g/bHP-hr 0.19 0.20 0.23 0.21
* Performance testing was conducted while the engine was operating at thc highest achievable load at current site conditions.
CORPORATE OFFICE
255 Grant St SE Surte 600
Decatur AL 35601
256 351 0121
t' ,r,,.i.r 3 i,3::eiecliilaa gTalp coti-
(
^/
f!l,
I 1.-, /l l -'
i
I
I
ril I )r: lr, ! r.. r l, t_., :--YAlllare
Source Test
Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility
800 W Central Valley Road
Salt Lake City, UT 84119-3379
Sources Tested: Jenbacher Engine #2 &
Jenbacher Engine #4
Test Dates: December 14 & 15,2023
Project No. AST-2023 -4301
Prepared By
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley City, UT 84120
pill6rrpE)
I'ECHNICAL GROUP Source Test Report
Source & Contact Infonnation
Resulatory Information
Permit Nos.
Regulatory Cilation
Source Information
Title V 3500191001 and DAQE-ANl04l400l5-21
40 CFR 60, Subpart JJJJ
Source Nane
GE Jenbacher Model JMS 612-
F28F02 Generator Engine
GE Jenbacher Model JMS 612-
F28F02 Generator Engine
Contact Information
Source ID
Jenbacher #2
Jenbacher #4
Target Parameters
NOx" CO, VOC, NMHC
NOx, CO, VOC, NMHC
Test Location
Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility
Wastewater Treatment Plant
800 W Central Valley Road
Salt Lake City, UT 84119-3379
Facility Contact
Zack Vanwormer
[e-mail]
[phone]
Ext. 128
Test Company
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley City, UT 84120
hoject Manager
Charles Horton
charles.horton@lliancetg. com
(3s2) 63-7568
Field Team Leader
Robert Burton
robert. burton@al liancetg.com
[phone]
QA/QC Manager
Kathleen Shonk
katie. [e-mail]
(812) 4s2-4785
Report Coordinator
Delaine Spangler
[e-mail]
Central Valley - Salt Lake City, UTAST-2023-4301
2 of87
Page i
pill6rpEr
Ii'CI_lNICAL GI-]CUP Source Test Report
C ert ifi cat ion St at ement
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (A[iance) has completed the source testing as described in this report. Results
apply only to the source(s) tested and operating condition(s) for the specific test date(s) and time(s) identified within
this report. All results are intended to be considered in their entirety, and Alliance is not responsible for use ofless
than the complete test report without written consent. This report shall not be reproduced in full or in part without
written approval from the customer.
To the best of my knowledge and abilities, all information, facts and test data are correct. Data presented in this
report has been checked for completeness and is accurate, error-free and legible. Onsite testing was conducted in
accordance with approved internal Standard Operating Procedures. Any deviations or problems are detailed in the
relevant sections in the test report.
This report is only considered valid once an authorized representative ofAlliance has sigred in the space provided
below; any other version is considered draft. This document was prepared in portable document format (.pdf) and
contains pages as identified in the bottom footer of this document.
c/J bhb 01t04t2024
Charles Horton, QSTI
Project Manager
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Date
Central Valley - Salt Lake City, UTAST-2023-430r
3 of87
Page ii
AIIATEE)
TECHNICAL GROTJP Source Test Report
Toble ofContents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
l.l Source and Control System Descriptions.. .......................... l-l
1.3 Site Specific Test Plan/Test Protocol & Notification .......... l-l
2.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and 2 - Volumetric Flow Rate...... ......................... 2-l
2.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 34, - Oxyger/Carbon Dioxide .............2-l
2.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 320 - BWS, NOx, CO, VOC, and NMHC........................................ 2-l
2.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Gas Dilution System Certification... .................2-2
2.5 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3,A' ................. .........................2-2
2.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Method 320................ ..........2-3
LIST OF TABLES
APPEI{DICES
Appendix A Sample Calculations
Appendix B Field Data
Appendix C Quality Assurance/Quality Control Data
Appendix D Engine Operating Data
Appendix E Site Specific Test Plan
AST-2023-4301
4 of87
Page iiiCentral Valley - Salt Lake City, UT
N,6rEe
TECIiNICAL GROt]P Source Test Repon
lntroduction
1.0 Introduction
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by Central Valley Wastewater Reclamation Facility
(Central Valley) to conduct compliance testing at the Wastewater Treatment Plant in Salt Lake City, Utah. Portions
of the facility are subject to provisions of the 40 CFR 60, Subpart JJJJ and the Utah Department of Environmental
Quality, Division of Air Quality (UDAQ) Title V Permit No. 3500191001 and Approval Order (AO) DAQE-
AN104140015-21. Testing was conducted to determine the emission rates of nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon
monoxide (CO), volatile organic compounds (VOC), and non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHC) from the exhausts of
two (2) GE Jenbacher Model JSM 612-F28F02 engines designated as Jenbacher #2 and Jenbacher #4. The VOC
emissions do not include formaldehyde.
l.l Source and Control System Descriptions
Central Valley operates two (2) GE Jenbacher Model JMS 612-F28F02 generator engines. Each engine rates at
2,509 horsepower (hp). The engines can be fired on natural gas or digester gas. Testing for Jenbacher #2 and
Jenbacher #4 were conducted while the engines are fired on a mixed gas of blended digester gas and natural gas.
1.2 Project Team
Personnel involved in this project are identified in the following table.
Table l-1: ProjectTeam
1.3 Site Specific Test Plan/Test Protocol & Notification
Testing was conducted in accordance with the Site Specific Test Plan (SSTP) submitted to UDAQ by Central
Valley.
Central Valley - Salt Lake City, UT
Central Valley Personnel Zack Vanwormer
Regulatory Personnel UDAQ
Alliance Personnel Robert Burton
Dillon Brown
AST-2023-4301
6 of87
Page l-l
? of87
put6lpe
T iJ CJ I-i N I C A I G R O U F)
Source Test Report
Testing Methodologt
2.0 Testing Methodology
The emission testing program was conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 2-1. Method
descriptions are provided below while quality assurance/quality control data is provided in Appendix C.
Table 2-l: Source Testing Methodology
2.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and 2 - Volumetric Flow Rate
The sampling location and number of traverse (sampling) points were selected in accordance with U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method l. To determine the minimum number of traverse points, the upstream and downstream
distances were equated into equivalent diameters and compared to Figure I -2 in U.S. EPA Reference Test Method l.
Full velocity traverses were conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 to determine the
average stack gas velocity pressure, static pressure, and temperature. The velocity and static pressure measurement
system consisted of a pitot tube and inclined manometer. The stack gas temperature was measured with a K-type
thermocouple and pyrometer.
Stack gas velocity pressure and temperature readings were recorded during each test run. The data collected was
utilized to calculate the volumetric flow rate in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2.
2.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide
The oxygen (Oz) and carbon dioxide (COz) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test
Method 3A. Data was collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system consisted of a
stainless-steel probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system, and the identified gas analyzer. The gas
conditioning system was a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the stack gas. If an unheated
Teflon sample line was used, then a portable non-contact condenser was placed in the system directly after the
probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon sample line was used. The quality control measures are described in Section 2.5.
2.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 320 - BWS, NO6 CO, VOC, and NMHC
The concenfrations of moisture content (BWS), nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), volatile organic
compounds (VOC) and non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHC) were determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference
Test Method 320. Each source gas steam was extracted at a constant rate through a heated probe, heated filter and
heated sample line and analyzed with a MKS MultiGas 2030 FTIR operated by a portable computer. The computer has
FTIR specfra of calibration gases stored on the hard drive. These single component calibration spectra are used to
analyze the measured sample specta. The measured gas components were selected from the spectra library and
Central Valley - Salt Lake City, UT
Volumetric Flow Rate Full Velocity Traverses
Moisture Content / Nitrogen Oxides / Carbon
Monoxide / Volatile Organic Compounds /
Non-Methane Hydrocarbons
FTIR - Continuous Sampling
Gas Dilution System Certification
AST-2023-4301
8 of87
Page2-l
Source I'est Report
l'esting Methodology
incorporated into the analytical method. The signal amplitude, linearity, and signal to noise ratio were measured and
recorded to document analyzer performance. A leak check was performed on the sarnple cell. The instrument path length
was verified using ethylene as the Calibration Transfer Standard. Dynamic spiking was performed using a certified
standard of the target compound or appropriate surrogate in nitogen with sulfur hexafluoride blended as a tracer to
calculate the dilution factor. All test spectra, interferograms, and analytical method information are recorded and stored
wittr the calculated analytical results. The quality control measures are described in Section 2.6.
2.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Gas Dilution System Certification
A calibration gas dilution system field check was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Method 205.
Multiple dilution rates and total gas flow rates were utilized to force the dilution system to perform two dilutions on
each mass flow controller. The diluted calibration gases were sent directly to the analyzer, and the analyzer response
recorded in an electronic field data sheet. The analyzer response agreed within 2%o of the actual diluted gas
concentration. A second Protocol I calibration gas, with a cylinder concentration within l0% of one of the gas
divider settings described above, was introduced directly to the analyzer, and the analyzer response recorded in an
electronic field data sheet. The cylinder concentration and the analyzer response agreed within 27o. These steps
were repeated three (3) times.
2.5 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A
Cylinder calibration gases met EPA Protocol I (+l- 2%) standards. Copies of all calibration gas certificates are
included in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix of the report.
Low Level gas was introduced directly to the analyzer. After adjusting the analyzer to the Low Level gas
concentration and once the analyzer reading is stable, the analyzer value was recorded. This process was repeated
for the High Level gas. For the Calibration Enor Test, Low, Mid, and High Level calibration gases were
sequentially introduced directly to the analyzer. The Calibration Error for each gas was within 2.0 percent of the
Calibration Span or 0.5%o absolute difference.
High or Mid Level gas (whichever was closer to the stack gas concentration) was introduced at the probe and the
time required for the analyzer reading to reach 95 percent or 0.5% (whichever was less restrictive) of the gas
concentration was recorded. The analyzer reading was observed until it reached a stable value, and this value was
recorded. Next, Low Level gas was introduced at the probe and the time required for the analyzer reading to
decrease to a value within 5.0 percent or 0.5% (whichever was less restrictive) was recorded. If the Low Level gas
was zero gas, the acceptable response was 5.0 percent ofthe upscale gas concentration or 0.5%o (whichever was less
restrictive). The analyzer reading was observed until it reached a stable value and this value was recorded. The
measurement system response time and initial system bias were determined from these data. The System Bias for
each gas were within 5.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5%o absolute difference.
High or Mid Level gas (whichever was closer to the stack gas concentration) were introduced at the probe. After the
analyzer response was stable, the value was recorded. Next, Low Level gas was introduced at the probe, and the
analyzer value was recorded once it reached a stable response. The System Bias for each gas was within 5.0 percent
of the Calibration Span or 0.5Vo absolute difference or the data was invalidated and the Calibration Enor Test and
System Bias were repeated.
Central Valley Salt Lake City, UTAST-2023-4301
9 of87
Page2-2
AI
Source Tesl Repon
Testintz Methodolosv
The Drift between pre- and post-run System Bias were within 3 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5%o absolute
difference or the Calibration Error Test and System Bias was repeated.
To determine the number of sampling points, a gas stratification check was conducted prior to initiating testing. The
pollutant concentrations were measured at twelve traverse points (as described in Method l) or three points (16.7,
50.0 and 83.3 percent of the measurement line). Each traverse point was sampled for a minimum of twice the system
response time.
If the pollutant concentration at each traverse point did not differ more than 5o/o or 0.5 0.3% (whichever was less
restrictive) of the average pollutant concentration, then single point sampling was conducted during the test runs. If
the pollutant concentration did not meet these specifications but differed less than l0%o or 0.5% from the average
concentration, then three (3) point sampling was conducted (stacks less than 7.8 feet in diameter - 16.7,50.0 and
83.3 percent of the measurement line; stacks greater than 7.8 feet in diameter- 0.4, 1.0, and 2.0 meters from the
stack wall). If the pollutant concentration differed by more than l0% or 0.5oh from the average concentration, then
sampling was conducted at a minimum of twelve (12) traverse points. Copies of stratification check data are
included in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix of the report.
A Data Acquisition System with battery backup were used to record the instrument response in one (l) minute
averages. The data was continuously stored as a *.CSV file in Excel format on the hard drive of a computer. At the
completion of testing, the data was also saved to the Alliance server. All data was reviewed by the Field Team
Leader before leaving the facility. Once aniving at Alliance's office, all written and electronic data was
relinquished to the report coordinator and then a final review was performed by the Project Manager.
2.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Method 320
EPA Protocol I Calibration Gases - Cylinder calibration gases used met EPA Protocol I (+l- 2%) standards. Copies
of all calibration gas certificates can be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix.
After providing ample time for the FTIR to reach the desired temperature and to stabilize, zero gas (nitrogen) was
introduced directly to the instrument sample port. While flowing nitrogen the signal amplitude was recorded, a
background spectra was taken, a linearity check was performed and recorded, the peak to peak noise and the root
mean square in the spectral region ofinterest was measured and a screenshot was recorded.
Following the zero gas checks, room air was pulled through the sample chamber and the line width and resolution
was verified to be at 1879 cm-', the peak position was entered and the FWHH was recorded (screenshot). Following
these checks, another background spectra was recorded and the calibration transfer standard (CTS) was introduced
directly to the instrument sample port. The CTS instrument recovery was recorded and the instrument mechanical
response time was measured.
Next, stack gas was introduced to the FTIR through the sampling system and several scans were taken until a stable
reading was achieved. The native concentration of our target spiking analyte was recorded. Spike gas was
introduced to the sampling system at a constant flow rate < l0o/o of the total sample flow rate and a corresponding
dilution ratio was calculated along with a system response time. Matrix spike recovery spectra were recorded and
were within the + 30% of the calculated value of the spike concentration that the method requires.
tr"
TA
.l r . ,ri
Central Valley - Salt Lake City, UTAST-2023-4301
l0 of87
Page 2-3
iill
llil AItfu
TECHNICAL GROUP SourceTest Rqon
Testirtg Mefrpfulopy
The matrix spike recovery was conducted once at ttrc beginning of th€ tcsting and the CTS recovery Focedures
were rcpealed following cach test run. The corresponding values werc recorded.
il
l1
il
;
tl
i-l
'I;t
Ccntral Valley - Salt L*e City, UT
ll of&7
AST-2023430t PaSe24
**-utn.r
Pr-ijan ir,,i'i]T Ci--i
EI.IVI RONMENTAL QUALITY
IVISION OF AIR OUALITY
L J'-La
D
12 ofET
Tf:() il N I CAi., il,:{fl..i i)
Example Calculations
Lo""tion
Source Jenbacher #2
P.oj"., No.
Run No. I
Parameter(s) VFR
Absolute Stack Gas Pressure (Ps), in. Hg
.PgPs : Pb + j?6-
where,
Pb 25.88 _: barometric pressure, in. Hg
19 l--66-= static pressure, in. H2o
Ps 25.95 : in. Hg
Moisture Fraction (BWSsat), dimensionless (theoretical at saturated conditions)
,rf.'3;-(ffi). BWSsat :
where.PsTs@: stack temperature, oF
Pr 4 = absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
BWSsat 1.000 : dimensionless
Molecular Weight (DRY) (Md), lb/lb-mole
Md : (0.44 x o/oCO) + (0.32 x o/oO2) + (0.28(100-
where,
CO,
--.,1!|:
carbon dioxide concentration, 7o
OrA: oxygen concentration, 7o
Md@:lb/lbmol
Molecular Weight (WET) (Ms), lb/lb-mole
Ms = Md (1 - BWS) + 18.015 (BwS)
where,
Md 29.53 : molecular weight (DRY), lb/lb mol
BWS
-d:TO-i-
: moisture fraction, dimensionless
ttts-2EF: lb/lbmol
o/o CO2 - o/o O2))
Average Velocity (Vs), ftlsec
__..-_-Vs = 85.49 x Cp x (Lytlzlavg xwnere,
Cp 0.84 : pitot tube coefficient
a P"' l.03-6-= arerage pre/post test velocity head of stack gas, (in. H2o)r/2
Tr___2!-= average pre/post test absolute stack temp€rature, oR
Ps 25.95 = absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
tvts ---lEE- = molecular weight of stack gas, lb/ib mol
vs.7T-= ft/sec
Average Stack Gas Flow at Stack Conditions (Qa), acfm
Qa=60xVsxAs
where,
Vr__lll: stack gas velocity, ff/sec
As 2.18 : cross-sectional area ofstack, ft2qa@:acrm
Average Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions (Qs), dscfm
Qsd: l7.636xQax(l -BWS)x Ps
Ts
Qa 10,090 : average stack gas flowat stack conditions, acfm
BWS 0.101 : moisture fraction, dimensionlesspsE: absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
rtE: average pre/post test absolute stack temperature, oR
Qs 5,196 = dscfm
where,
l3 of87
rrlIffirrce?*c t-'l N I uA L {t xd}i.J p
Location: Central Valley Water Reclamation (CVWR)
Source: Jenbacher #4
Project No.: AST-2023-4301
Run No. /Method Run I / Method 320
VOC - Outlet Concentration (Cvoc"rs), ppmvd @ lsoh 02
cvoc",s = cvoc. #i|b
where,Cvoc 20.2 : VOC - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
Co,-Tf-: oxygen concentration, %o
cu6",rE:ppmvd @15%o,
VOC - Outlet Emission Rate (ERroj, lb/hr
Cys6 x MW x Qs x 60 +!.28.32 h,nror -
where,Cvoc 20.2 : VOC - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
Mw-aT-: voc molecular weight, g/g-moleqs1-F: stack gas volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, dsctnERuo.-0-6-: lb/hr
VOC - Outlet Emission Rate (ERyscrpy), ton/yr
ERvocrpy: t*"3:#ff-, #
where,ERvoc 0.68 : VOC - Outlet Emission Rate, lb/hr
ERvoc1py-.9-:ton/yr
VOC - Outlet Emission Factor (EFysg), g/hp-hr
EE - ERuoS. aY ,qrrvoc --Bgyy
where,
ERvoc 0.68 : VOC - Outlet Emission Rate, lb/hr
EBW.---I;iffi: engine brake work, HP
EFvoc-:T28-: g/hp-hr
l4 of87
Location: Central Vallev Water Reclamation (CVWR
Project No.: AST-2023-430 I
Run No. /Method Run I / Method 320
NOx - Outlet Concentration (Cxo,"rs), ppmvd @ lsy" O,
C*o*",s: CNo* x 7 20.q-15 1\ 20.9-0, )
C"o* 65.9 : NOx - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
Co,
-TfZ-:
oxygen concentration, o/o
CNo*"rs 40.1 : ppmvd @l5o/o Oz
where,
NOx - Outlet Emission Rate (ERps,), lb/hr
- CNo* x MW x Qs x 60 ff x28.32 #t^No* -
where,
NOx - Outlet Emission Factor (EFyej, g/hp-hr
ED - ERr.ro" xafi.592*",*o__TlF
where,
CNo"65.9 : NOx - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
MW 46.0055 : NOx molecular weight, g/g-mole
qsE:stackgasvolumetricflowrateatstandardconditions,dscftn
ERNo* 2.33 = lb/hr
NOx - Outlet Emission Rate (ERpe,1py), ton/yr
ERNo*rpv: t*-r:#ffi, #
where,
ERNo* 2.33 = NOx - Outlet Emission Rate, lb/hr
ERNo"rpy-T0Jq-: bn/yr
ERNo*
EBW
EF*o'
2,414 : engine brake work, HP
0.437 : grhp-hr
: NOx - Outlet Emission Rate, lb/hr
l5 of87
antffirrce
Tffi&1.,,INIC&L TIR(}U P
Location: Central Valley Water Reclamation (CVWR)
Source: Jenbacher #4
Project No.: AST-2023-4301
Run No. /Method Run I / Method 320
CO - Outlet Concentration (Cco"rr), ppmvd @ l5Yo Oz
where,
where,
28.01
: CO - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
= CO molecular weight, g/g-mole
Qs 4,923 : stack gas volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, dscfmER69-.F:lb/hr
CO - Outlet Emission Rate (ERs6rpy), ton/yr
ER^^*- - sRco l.Q'7oo $_^avrrr 2,000tb
where,
ERco 8.37 : CO - Outlet Emission Rate, lb/hrER.orr"I.[:ton/yr
CO - Outlet Emission Factor (EF6e), g/hp-hr
DD - ERcoxafi.592fi".co-Tffi
ERco
EBW
EFco
8.37 : CO - Outlet Emission Rate, lb/hr
2,414 = engine brake work, HPt.572 : glhp-hr
cco.rs= ccox (:#
Cco 389.3 : CO - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
Co,-ll- : oxygen concentration, o/o
Cco",t 236.9 : ppmvd @llYoOz
CO - Outlet Emission Rate (ER6e), lb/hr
C6e x MW x Qs x 60# x28.32 h
"rtco -
where,
Cco
MW
389.3
l6 of87
anImrpeT6UHNTL;Ar- *;ffi{.}Up
Location: Central Valley Water Reclamation (CVWR)
Source: Jenbacher #4
Project No.: AST-2023-4301
Run No. /Method Run I / Method 3A
Oz - Outlet Concentration (Cs,), 7o dry
Co,: ( Cou, - Co ). ( affi)
where,Coo, ll.2 : average analyzer value during test, %o dry
Co
-O:-:
average of pretest & posttest zero responses , o/o dry
CMA-T2T-: actual concentration of calibration gas, % dry
CM-TZ.-: average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, %o dry
Co,T : Oz Concentration, %o dry
COz - Outlet Concentration (C6s), %o dry
cco,= (cou,-col. ( *-"-;)
where,
Cou, 6.5 : average analyzer value during test, % dry
Co-T-: average of pretest & posttest zero responses,o/o dry
CMA-T73-: actual concentration of calibration gas,o/o dry
CM-TZO-: average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, 7o dry
Cco,-: COz Concentration, %o dry
17 of87
Location Central Valley Water Reclamation (CVWR)
Sou.ce(s)
Project No. AST-2023-4301
Date(s) 8114/2023
CTS Recovery Value (CTSil, %
CTSous x loo
cTScyt
Where,
CTS^,9: average of all CTS calibration gas readings, ppm
CTS"r'Jl_ : CTS bottle certified gas value, ppm
CTSR 101.3% : CTS recovery value,o/o
Spike Dilution Factor (DF), 7o
SF6spiJ., -SF6ror x 100
SF6ai7
Where,
SF6o,.j = average ofdirect tracer gas value readings
SF6n"t 0.01 = average ofnative tracer gas value readings
SF6,o1"@ : average ofdynamic spike tracer gas value readings
DF ll.23yo = spike dilution factor,%o
Calculated Spike (Spike.,r"), ppm
(D F x Analyte o,) + (Analytenos x (1 - DF))
Where,
DF . ll.23yo = spike dilution factor, o/o
Analyte6i. 93.00 : average of direct analyte gas values, ppm
Analyte n"t__1![ = average of native analye gas values, ppm
Spike.ol" 10.89 = calculated spike, ppm value, ppm
Spike Recovery Value (Spikep), 7o
Analltesp*" , rOO
Spike"o7,
Where,
Spike""r"S : calculated spike, ppm value, ppm
Anallteroil" 8150 : average ofspiked analyte gas values, ppm
Spikep 79.00% : spike recovery valte,o/o
l8 of87
l9 ofET
#*-AllatrcGr
: :: . . : I, - , i:
Em issions Calculations
Locxtion Cental Valle]' Water Reclmdion (CVWR)
Source Jenbacher #2
Project No. AST-2023-4301
Run Number Run I Run 2 Run 3 AvcrePc
)ate l2ll5/23 lzllsD3 l2ll5/23
iffi Timc 9:24 10139 12:33
itoDTimc 10:24 ll:39 13:33
Encine Dxt,
lngine Milufacturer GE
lngine Model JMS 612-F28F02
ingine Serial Number 1322416
lnginc Ttp€ Comprcssion lgrilion
lngin€ Date ofManufacturer DOM 2017-01-01
lnqine Hour Motur Readinq EMR 18,480
lngine Exhaust Tempeature- "F 983 9E4 9E3 983
ienemtor Output. Hz Gen OP 60 60 60 60
lngine Speed. RPM ES l-500 1.500 1.500 1.500
lngine Bmkc Work. HP EBW 2.415 2.415 2.415 2,415
vlaximum Bmkc Work. HP Ma\EBW 2-509 7.509 2,509 2,509
lngine Load. % EL 96 96 96 96
\rnbient Tempcrature Tmr 45 45 45 45
leldiv€ Humidit\: o/o RH 30 l0 30 30
larcmeric Pressure- in Hs Pb 25.75 2575 25.15 25.75
InDut Drtr - Outlct
vloi$ure FBction. dimcnsionless BWS 0 l0l 0. l0l 0.098 0.100
y'olumetricFlowRatc(Ml-l).dscfin Qs 5.196 5.081 5.093 5.123
)' ConcentEtion. Todn Co, I L5t 1 1.44 1 1.43 1 1.48
lol Concentntion. To dn C.n,i5 65664668
FTIR Crldlrted Drti
vlethile - Oudet Concentration. ppmvd Ccx. 1512 l7 1548.44 1561.44 t560.6E
vlcthane-Outletconccntration.ppmvlv Ccs.* l4l3.ll 1392-06 1408.74 1404.64
vlcthile - Outlet Conccntration. ppmvd O 15 % O. Ccs.,s 995.66 965.28 972.51 971.82
dethme - Outlet Emission Ratc. Ib/hr E&s. 20.42 19.66 19.88 19.99
vlerhme - Outlet Emissron Rate. ton/tr ERcn.pr E9.43 86 13 t7.06 t7 54
{ethmc - Oudet Emission Factor- e/HP-hr EF"p- 3.84 3.69 3 73 3.75
Ithoo - Outlet Concentation. ppmvd Cc,u. 26.96 26.23 26.14 26.64
Ithdc - Outlct Concent6tion. ppmvd (d C3Ht)* Cc,r. 17 -79 17 -31 11.65 17.58
Ithme - Outlet ConcentBtion. ppmwr Cc&* 24 23 23 58 24.12 23.98
lthue-Outlctconcenhtion.ppnvd 415%O, Cc,s.rs 17.07 16.35 1665 16.69
Ithae - Outlet Emission Ratc. lbihr ERc,s. 0.66 0.61 0.6,1 0.64
Ithme - Outlet Emission Rate. ton/tr ERc,u.mr 2.87 2 74 2.79 2.t0
Ithde-OutletEmissionFactor.q/HP-hr EF.,r. 012 0.12 0.12 0.12
romaldehldo - Outlet ConcentEtion. ppmvd Ccuos 49-66 49-03 4E.30 4E.99
romaldehldc - Outlet ConcentBtion. ppmvN C"rur" 44.63 44.08 43.57 44-09
romaldehldc - OutletConcenmtion. ppmvd @ 15 o/oo, C.rus.,, 31.45 30 56 30.08 30 70
romaldehlde - Outlct Emission Rde. lb/hr ERcsou l.2l l.l7 l.l5 I 17
romaldehide - Outlet Emission Rde. ton/yr ERcsoupr 5.29 5 tl 5.04 5 15
romaldehvdc - Outlet Emission Facbr. c/HP-hr EF.r"r O.23 0.22 O.2X 0.22
lO - Outlet Concentntion. ppmvd Crc 455.13 450.74 446.44 450.17
lo-Outlerconcentntion.ppmvd4 l5%O, Cc*rs 288.23 280.99 278.06 2t243
lO - Outlet Enission Rde. lb/hr ERco 10.32 10.00 9 97 l0 08
lO - Outl€t Emission Rde, ton/\r ERcnnr 45-21 43-78 43-47 44. 15
lO - Outlet Emission Factor. g/HP-hr EFco L94 I 88 L86 L89
{Ox - Outlet Conccntration, ppmvd Cr., 58 l0 59-20 54.88 57.39
{Ox - Outlet Concentntion. ppmvd @ 15 % O, CNo"rs 36.19 36.91 34.18 35.96
,lox - Outlet Emission Rate. lb,4rr ERr.* 2.16 2.16 2.00 2.ll
\lox - Outlet Emission Rato. ton/lr ERro,mr 9.4E 9 45 8.7E 9 23
{ox - Ourlet Emission Factor. s+IP-hr EF.o. 0.41 0.41 0.38 0.40
VOC - Outlet Concenhtion, ppmvd Cu* 23 75 23.42 24.01 23.73
VOC-OutletConcentntion.ppnvd,E15%O' Cvoc.rr 1504 14.60 14.95 14.t6
Voc-OutletEmissionR c,lb^rr ERvm 0.E5 0.E2 0.84 0.E4
VOC - Outlet Emission Rate. tor/lr ERvcmt 3-71 3.58 3 68 3.66
Voc-OutletEmissionFactor.c,/HP-hr EFu* 0.16 0.15 0 16 0.16
,,[e-mail] Cuscr-esrr 4154 40.73 41.65 41.31
,,[e-mail] Crrscr-cusr 31.34 36.62 37.58 37.18
\IMHC-OutletConentmtion.ppmvdra 15%01 Cumcroc:slrs 26-31 25-39 25-94 25.EE
{MHC - Outlet Emission Rate . lbihr ERrurr-..uo l.4E |.42 I 46 1.45
{MHC - Outlet Emi$ion Rate. ton/$ lRNMrc(.,caH&rp 6.50 6.23 6 39 6.37
{MHc-OutlctEmissionFactor.p/HP-hr EFn"u.,-..r" 02t 0.27 0.27 0.27
2l of87
AlffirceYE{:FtNtCAL Sft(}tjp
Runl-RMData
Loa"tioo,
Sourcc: Jenbrcher#2
Projc.t No.:
Drt.:
Tim
Unit
O, - Outl.t COr - Outleto/.dry V.drl
Uncorr.cted Run Avcrag. (C.b)
Crl Grs Com.ntrrtion (CMA)
Pretcst Syltem Zero Rerpon$
P6tt6t Sysaem Zcro R.spoN
Avcmg. mRespoN(Co)
Prcacsa Syslem C.l RespoN
P6tt6t Systcm Cd Responsc
Avcng. Crl R6ponse (CM)
Corecacd Rur
9:24
9.25
9:26
9:27
9:28
9:29
9:30
9:31
9:32
9:33
9:34
9:35
9:36
9137
9i38
9:39
9:40
9:41
9:42
9:43
9:44
9:45
9:46
9:47
9:48
9:49
9:50
9:51
9:52
9:53
9:54
9:55
9:56
9:57
9i58
9:59
l0:00
l0:01
l0:02
l0:03
l0:04
l0:05
l0:06
l0:07
l0:08
l0:09
l0:10
l0:ll
l0:12
l0:13
l0: l4
t0:15
l0: l6
l0:1 7
l0: l8
l0: l9
t0:20
l0:21
l0:22
l0:23
il.44 6.49
12.00 12.00
-0.01 0.02
0.08 "0.020.04 0.00
11.83 |.79
11.88 I 1.68
I t.85 tt.14
u.58 6.64
u.4t
tt.4l
tt.42
I l.4l
il.43
|.42
tr.42
ll.4l
lt.42
1.42
I 1.43
I t.43
I 1.43
I 1.44
I 1.44
ll.45
I 1.45
I 1.46
I I,46
I1.48
11.47
t 1.46
t 1.46
I 1.46
tt.47
t t.46
t 1.46
I1.45
I t.45
u.45
11.44
I 1.45
tt.44
I 1.44
|.44
I 1.44
I 1.43
ll.44
I 1.45
I 1.45
I 1.45
tl.44
I L44
I L44
11.45
I 1.44
1t.44
1t.44
I 1.46
I1.45
I 1.44
11.45
t t.45
l1.45
t t.45
I 1.46
I 1.48
I 1.46
tt.47
6.5 I
6.51
6.50
6.51
6.50
6.50
6.50
6.50
6.49
6.49
6.49
6.50
6.50
6.49
6.49
6.48
6.49
6.48
6.48
6.47
6.47
6.48
6.48
6.48
6.47
6.48
6.49
6.48
6.49
6.49
6.49
6.49
6.48
6.49
6.49
6.49
6.49
6.48
6.48
6.49
6.49
6.50
6.49
6.50
6.49
6.48
6.49
6.49
6.50
6.48
6.49
6.50
6.50
5.50
5.51
6.5 l
6.50
6.49
6.49
6.49
22 of87
Runl-FTIRDatatffiAl
i.ltt 'r!<-;t,'
Projd No.:
Drh:
Tlm
Unil
MDL
Tamp.ntun
'c
kthrre-Odlet Erhrm-Outl.t Fotm.ldehyde-Ourlet CO-Outht
ppmvw ppnvw ppmtr ppdd
0.0r 0.08 0.08 0.13
NOr-O(lGr vOC-Ouht Bws-Outhtppmd ppmvd '/. (\|e.|
0.?{ 0.2t
9:24
9:25
9:26
9:21
9:28
9:29
9:30
9:31
9:J2
9:33
9:34
9:35
9:36
9:J7
9:18
9:39
9:40
9r4l
9:42
9:43
9:44
9:45
9:46
9:41
9:48
9:49
9:50
9:51
9:52
9:53
9:54
9,55
9r56
9r57
9:58
9:59
l0:m
l0:01
l0:02
l0:03
l0:g
lo:05
l0:6
l0:07
l0:08
l0:09
l0r l0
l0rll
l0r l2
l0: l3
l0: I4
l0: l5
l0: l6
l0: i7
l0r I8
l0: I9
I 0:20
I 0r2l
lO:22
I0r23
91.0
91.0
91.0
91.0
91.0
91 0
91 0
91 0
91.0
91.0
91.0
91.0
qt.9
s.9
90.9
90.9
s.9
91.0
91.0
9lo
t91 0
t91 0
I 90.9
t91.0
t91 0
t91.0
t91.0
I91.0
191.0
t91.0
t$.9
t91.0
t91.0
ts.9
t91 0
t91.0ts9
91.0
91.0
91.0
91.0
91.0
91.0
9r.0
91.0
91.0
91.0
91.0
91.0
91.0
91.0
91.0
91.0
91.0
9L0
91.0
91.0
9t.0
91 0
9L0
0 850
0 850
0.860
0.850
0.860
0 8i0
0 850
0 850
0s0
0.850
0 850
0 850
0.850
0.850
0.850
0.850
0.850
0.850
0.850
0.850
0.850
0.850
0.850
0.850
0.s0
0.850
0.850
0.850
0.850
0.850
0.850
0.850
0.850
0.850
0 850
0.850
0 850
0s0
0 8i0
0 850
0 850
0.850
0.850
0.850
0s0
0 850
0 850
0 850
0 850
0 850
0 850
0 850
0 850
0 850
0.850
0 850
0.850
0 850
0 850
0.860
t.399.5
t,412 I
|,426 8
t,406.3
l,419.7
1.415.4
1.06.8
1,385 7
\q2.3
|,412 1
t,408.6
|,440. I
t,42t.J
1,42.5
t,422 9
t.47 4 4
1.69.6
t,4t7.0
1.4i0.7
I,499.4
t.477 8
1.435 4
L460 9
1.414.2
1,484.1
t.44t.2
1.423.6
|.433 2
t.420.5
1.42 t.4
t,4 I 9.2
t.415 7
t.190 4
1.399.4
t,379 8
1.396.6
t.360.6
t.361 .7
l.4t 3.6
1,389.0
t,370 I
t.3641
t.369.6
|,349.2
1.384 4
t.420 4
r,38i.8
t,05.0
1,182.9
r.198.0
l.{5 9
1,380.5
|,313.2
t,311.6
r.186.9
1,390.9
1.392.8
l,4t i.9
|.421.9
t,426.9
23.1
24.3
24.6
245
246
24.5
24.0
23.8
23.9
24.1
24.1
241
245
25.2
24_6
251
25.4
25.6
25.4
26.2
26_l
25.0
259
260
26.5
25.3
25.0
25.1
24.8
24.6
24_9
24.5
24_3
24-l
24.t
23.0
23.6
24.4
23.8
22.9
22_a
23.3
22.6
23.0
24_O
21.6
23.i
23.O
23.3
230
228
22.8
22.8
22_9
23.O
23.3
23.4
24.4
23.8
450
434
418
46.9
44.6
42.6
44.3
45.4
45 I
44.5
6l
43.1
43.6
44.O
466
15.?
457
44.9
463
46 I
463
463
455
450
450
461
45 I
460
44.2
44.7
454
41.9
440
440
44.0
44.1
4l.l
43.5
44t
447
45.3
439
43.2
43.6
44_2
44.9
44.t
44.1
43.1
44.5
44.8
44.1
43.t
43.9
45.7
44_3
14_3
44_O
443
44.5
452.2
451.6
455.4
455.8
455.8
45 1.0
452.2
{9.8
452.9
454.2
455. r
459 4
455 8
460.5
462 4
{594
66.3
550
65.8
416.t
172.O
463. I
461.9
67.4
469. I
464.3
456.8
6t.8
451.4
458.7
456.8
455.2
452.0
454.0
449.0
453 7
{3.5
{38
451 5
4J0 I
e8.2
456
440
u26
476
457.3
448.i
45 1.0
447.4
451 0
453 0
M40
&89
449 9
MA7
497
455 I
457.8
456.2
58.6
58.9
57.1
590
58.1
58.9
58.3
58.9
58.2
584
58.2
582
57.8
s7.o
57 I
55.6
56.8
56.4
56.4
55.r
554
t51
56.4
56.0
55.6
567
51 4
57.4
t1.6
37.6
t7.8
51.6
58.0
58 I
58.9
i8.l
597
583
585
59.2
59.4
595
595
59.9
59.2
58.5
591
594
0.1
58.9
59.2
59.6
t9.5
i8.7
59.0
588
586
58.2
580
s1.6
24.t
22.9
2t _9
23.8
24.t
21.9
23.3
23.7
24.O
219
246
23.8
24.O
24.8
21.a
21.4
24.A
24_t
243
249
25.4
25.1
24.4
25.6
239
238
24_4
24_6
24.1
236
235
248
247
24.5
22.a
23_O
23.6
23.1
22.9
23.2
23.2
22.5
23.4
23.O
23.9
22.4
24.O
23.0
25.2
23.5
23.8
23.9
22.5
21.2
21.6
22.O
232
t0l
9.9
98
t0.6
101
9.1
t0.l
10.3
l0.l
l0.l
10.5
9.8
99
10.0
10.6
l0l
10.0
99
10.3
l0.t
10.2
102
l0t
9.9
10. I
I0.t
I0.l
I0.2
t0.2
l0.l
10.0
l0.l
10.4
10. I
102
100
t0. I
t0. I
10.4
l0 I
104
9.9
100
102
99
10. I
100
l0t
l0t
100
102
l0 t
l0 3
10.5
10.2
l0t
10.2
102
lo2
23 of87
nlImrce?€,*HN!fi&l* *fi$tJp
Run2-RMData
t a"tio.,
Sourcc: Jenbrcher #2
Pruject No.:
Daaci
Tim
Unit
O'-Oudca COr-Outlet
'/.dr! '/"dr!
Uncorrectcd Run Average (C"6)
Cal Gas Concentretion (Cy6)
Prctest Syrtcm Zcro Respons
P6at6t Sysacm Zcro Rcrpw
Av.mg. ZEre Rcspoos (Co)
Prcacst Sysaem Cal Respons
PNtt6l Syst m C.l R.spon$
Aycmgc Cal Response (CM)
l0:19
l0:40
l0:41
l0:42
l0:43
l0:44
l0:45
l0:46
l0:47
l0:48
l0:49
l0:50
l0:5 I
1O.52
l0:53
l0:54
l0:55
l0:56
l0:J7
l0:58
l0:59
I li00
I l:01
I l:02
I lr03
I l:04
I l:05
I l:06
I l:07
I l:08
I l:09
I l:10
ll:ll
I l:12
l l:13
I l:14
I l:15
I l:16
I l:17
l l:18
llrl9
I l:20
ll:21
ll:22
I l:23
ll:24
ll:25
11,26
ll:27
I l:28
1l:29
ll:30
I l:31
tl:32
ll:33
I l:34
I l:35
I l:36
ll:37
I l:38
tt.29
12.00
0.08
0.0i
0.04
I 1.88
t t.8l
11.85
t1 u
6.51
12.00
4.02
0.03
0.01
1 1.68
I l.7l
I1.69
I 1.36
t t.35
I 1.34
I 1.34
u.34
I 1.34
u.34
tl.33
u.34
I 1.34
I 1.35
I 1.35
I 1.35
I 1.36
I l.l5
r 1.34
I 1.35
I l.l4
r 1.34
I 1.34
I 1.34
tt.32
11.32
1t.32
u.31
u.3l
lt.32
11.12
tl.32
11.30
ll.3l
tl.29
I 1.28
11.28
tt.26
11.26
I 1.25
I 1.25
11.25
|.24
t1.24
1.24
1.23
lt.23
1.23
tt.22
1t.22
tl.2t
t1.22
I l.2l
l l.2l
I 1.20
n.22
tt.22
tl.23
tt.25
11.26
11.27
I 1.28
ll30
6.48
6.49
6.50
6.50
6.50
6.49
6.49
6.50
6.49
6.50
6.48
6.50
6.49
6.50
6.51
6.51
6.51
6.50
6.51
6.51
6.51
6.51
6.51
6.50
6.50
6.50
6.50
6.49
6.49
6.50
6.51
6.s2
6.53
6.52
6.52
6.53
6.54
6.54
5.53
6.53
6.54
6.52
6.54
6.54
6.53
6.53
6.53
6.53
6.51
6.52
6.51
6.52
6.52
6.51
6.51
6.51
6.50
6.48
6.48
647
24 of87
4d"Alihrpe
T i, C : I N ] C A L ,: R i]' L A
Run2-FTIRData
lmtbtr:
PrejdNo.:
Tim
Utr
MDL
T.mp.rrtur MethrE-O(lct Ethrm-Odet Formrldehyde-Outtet CO-OutLtppmvw ppmvw ppmrr ppmvd
0.0d 0.0t 0.m 0.13
NOr-Odlct VOC -Od.t BWS- Outlet
ppm d ppwd '/. (*et\
o.11 0.28
,443.6
,41 1.9
,423.1
,454.6
.4t5 2
,45 1.8
,458. I
,422.6
,422.3
,43 t. I
,397.0
.4t6 9
.4t 4. I
,399.i
,4t5.0
.05.1
.383 I
,396.9
,385.9
,387 1
.385.4
,379.t
I I:03
I l:04
I l:05
ll6
I l:07
I I:08
ll:B
l:10
l:l I
l:12
I tl
lr l4
lr15
lr l6
l:17
I l:i8
l l:19
I 1r20
I lr?l
ll:22
I l:21
l0:39
l0:40
l0:41
l0:42
I 0r4l
t04
10i45
l0:6
lO:47
t0 48
l0:49
I 0:i0
l0:51
l0:52
lOr53
l0rY
l0:55
l0:56
l0:57
l0:58
l0:59
ll:m
I l:01
I l:02
191.0
190.9
t91.0
191.0
t91.0
t91 0
l91 0
l9l.0
190.9
l{.9
l9l.0
l9t.0
ls.9
190.9
19t.0
l9t.0
l9t 0
190 9
l9r 0
l9t 0
l9t 0
l9t 0
l9t 0
I9l I
l9l I
l9t I
t91.0
l9l. I
I9t.t
t91.0
!91.0
I9l.l
t91.0
t 9l.l
19t.0
t91 0
t91 0
t91 0
l9l.0
r91.0
19t.0
191.0
0.850
0.850
0 850
0 850
0 850
0.850
0.850
0.850
0 850
0.850
0.850
0.850
0.850
0.850
0.850
0.850
0.850
0.850
0.850
0.850
0.850
0.8i0
0.850
0 850
0.850
0 850
0.s0
0 850
0.&0
0.s0
0 860
0.850
0.s0
0.850
0.s0
0.860
0.850
0 860
0.&0
0.860
0.860
0.860
0.860
0.850
0 860
0 860
0.860
0.860
0.&0
0.860
o 860
0.60
0.60
0.860
0.860
0.860
0.860
0.860
0.s0
0.860
t,51.3
t,46 r.7
t,43.5
t,424.6
1,452 4
252
25.3
25.0
25.O
25.1
25.0
24.2
24.3
24.1
24.2
24.9
25.4
24.6
24.3
25.2
23.9
23.1
14_3
23.8
24.4
24.0
23.4
23.3
23.5
23.5
236
23.2
23.9
240
21.1
236
235
22.8
22.9
22.5
22.t
2t.7
2t.1
22.6
22.5
22_l
22_t
22_t
22.5
23.1
22.8
22.9
220
22.5
223
22.4
22.4
22.6
23.2
23.3
23.8
238
24.5
21.8
26.2
42.3
42.1
41.9
42.2
43.0
44.1
45.5
45.3
44_9
45.3
45.9
44.6
439
483
44.4
441
46.O
44.4
43.8
44.9
45 I
469
45.0
&.1
45.0
45.0
43.9
45.7
44_6
44.2
43_9
44.6
43.8
44.1
41.5
42_6
42.8
426
4l.l
43.t
43.3
43.3
42.8
41.2
435
432
44.0
42.8
43.0
42.9
42.9
42.8
43.5
431
43.5
44.5
44.3
44.1
45.4
46.t
463.1
460.9
457 8
456 0
4&2
6t.3
ffi.8
ffi.3
64_7
45?.8
465.6
463.3
458.5
64.2
459_4
454_9
60.4
457 I
453.4
456 0
45t.1
452.3
45t 6
450 6
450.1
45 1.5
e8.4
4Ji 6
451 8
451 4
448 5
&9t
443.5
445.9
417.6
434 9
436.0
431 1
438.i
440 5
434.3
439 4
433 2
438.1
439 9
41.7
w_o
435.0
42.O
434.0
40.2
439 6
Mt3
M6.O
&9.7
454.0
451.4
63.6
&9.3
480.7
56.9
57.4
57.5
58.2
58.2
.7
s7.2
578
57.5
58.2
56.8
57.5
570
515
586
51.6
57.7
51.9
584
58.6
589
58.6
58.4
58.5
59.1
59.1
58.6
58.8
586
59 I
59.2
59.7
6.2
60.5
60.5
s.8
61.1
62_4
61.3
6t.1
62.O
61.6
62.t
616
61.8
61.8
6t.2
6t.1
61.3
62.6
6t.7
62.2
60.9
@.2
592
58.3
58.0
56. I
55.6
53.8
229
23.0
22.4
2t.4
23.6
23.6
24.0
23.9
23.5
245
24.3
241
238
25.4
23.5
237
11-6
231
21.2
23.4
23.3
2t.3
23.1
21.8
243
218
24.1
22.7
22.8
22.5
240
23t
22.a
235
232
23.8
23.3
22_2
23.1
229
2t7
22.5
22.4
23.3
23_9
23.1
23.t
22.8
22.4
23_3
z3.t
22.5
23.2
24.1
24.O
23.t
250
24.3
25.3
9.5
9.4
9.5
9.6
95
9.9
I 0.2
I 0.2
t0.0
t0 2
t0 t
99
t0.0
t0.9
t0.2
t0.2
l0 4
t0 I
t0.0
I0. I
10.2
10.7
t02
to2
10.3
10.4
l0.l
10.4
10.3
lo I
l9t
l9t
l9l
l9t
191
l9t
l9t
l9l
l9t
l9l
l9l
l9t
t9l
l9t
t9t I
191.0
191.0
l9l.l
t,402.6
t.397.3
1.396.1
r,388 3
t,386.5
t,358 5
t.366 7
t,337.9
t,ll8.l
1,327.8
1,306 0
l,l52.l
1,355.8
1,125 I
1,1374
l,l t4.3
|.342.4
1,355.8
r,37 1.5
|,333_4
1.360 8
1,32t.6
|,347.2
1.346 I
1,349 0
t.37?..1
1,389.9
I,408.5
l,4l 2.8
t,450.6
1,463.8
1,509.8
t0.l
t0. I
I 0.2
t0 I
t0. I
to_2
t0.I
too
t0.I
t0 I
t0.0
t0 t
t0 t
l0
10.
10.
lo
l0
t0
l0
l0
l0
l0
to
lo
l0
l0
l0
l0
t0
I l:24
I l:25
I l:26
ll:27
ll:28
I l:29
I l:10
I l:31
I l:32
ll:33
I l:34
I l:35
I l:36
ll:37
ll:38
25 of 87
nlIffirceTT*i{NICAL GH*UT
Run3-RMData
Lo"rtiont
Sourcc: Jenbrcher #2
No.: AST-2023-4301
Tim
Unit
Or - Outlct COr - Outlct
"/"dry '/.drr
Uncorreclcd Ru Averagc (C"6)
Csl Gas Conccnar.tiotr (CMA)
Prct6t Systcm Zero R.spon$
Posttcst System Zcro RespoM
Avcmg. 2610 Respo@ (Co)
Prctcat Syrtem C.l Respoe
Pcttdt Syst mCd RespoNe
Avcr.g. Cd Rdponse (CM)
l2:33
12,34
12.35
l2:36
l2:37
l2:38
12.39
12.40
12,41
12:42
12:43
12:44
12:45
12:46
l2:47
l2:48
12149
l2:50
l2i5l
12:52
12:53
l2:54
12:55
12:56
12:57
l2:58
12:59
l3:00
l3:01
l3:02
l3:03
l3:04
l3:05
l3:06
l3:07
l3:08
l3:09
l3:10
l3:ll
l3: l2
l 3:13
l3: l4
l3: l5
l3il6
13:17
l3i l8
l3: l9
l3:20
ll:21
l3:22
l3:23
l3:24
l3:25
l3:26
l3:27
l3:28
l3:29
l3:30
l3:31
13:32
11.24
12.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
I l.8l
11.80
I t.8l
I 1.20
I t.2t
I 1.20
I 1.20
lt.19
I l.l8
I l.l9
Il.t9
I l.l9
I l.l9
t l.19
I l.l9
I l.19
I 1.20
I 1.20
l l.19
ll.2l
tt.22
I 1.23
|.22
|.23
11.23
11.23
tt.24
11.24
11.25
Lt.24
11.25
I 1.25
11.25
tt.26
I 1.28
tt.29
1t.29
tl.29
I 1.28
1r.28
I 1.29
I 1.28
I 1.30
|.29
I 1.29
I 1.28
11.26
1.27
|.27
|.25
|.26
I 1.25
tt.26
1t.26
11.25
tt.z5
11.25
11.25
1t.24
tt.24
tt.z2
11.22
11.43
6.49
12.00
0.03
0.00
0.02
I l.7l
I 1.70
I 1.70
6.5 I
6.50
6.50
6.50
6.50
6.5 r
6.50
6.50
6.50
6.50
6.50
6.51
6.5 t
6.5 t
6.50
6.50
6.49
6.50
6.48
6.49
6.5 r
6.50
6.49
6.41
5.48
6.48
6.41
6.47
6.48
6.50
6.48
6.47
6.47
6.47
6.46
6.48
6.49
6.48
6.49
6.47
6.47
6.47
6.47
6.47
6.47
6.48
6.48
6.41
6.47
6.48
6.48
6.48
6.47
6.48
6.48
6.49
6.50
6.50
6.49
6.42
26 of87
Run3-FTIRDataAlmatps
T::(: ii i{ rCl1L {i R* l-l i}
r -"il-.Sntrr.. Imhn.h& {1
Pmid No.: AST-2023J301
Thc
Unlt
MDL
Trhp€r.turc Melhs. - Odlet Etham - Outler Forhdd.hyde - Oull.l CO - Outlet
ppm's ppmvw Ppmw ppmd
0.01 0.08 0.m 0.8
NOr - Od.t VOC - Oubt BWS - Outlcipphrd ppnvd % (vet',
0.7{ 0.28
l2:15
12r36
t2:37
t2 38
l2:39
t2 40
I 2r4l
12:41
l2:u
l2:45
l2:6
12,41
l2:48
l2:49
l2:50
l2r5l
12:52
12r53
l2:54
l2:55
t2:
t2:31
I 2:i8
l2:59
l3rm
l3:01
l3:02
13r03
l3:&
t3 05
l3:06
l3:07
13r08
ll:09
l3rl0
ll:ll
l3r l2
r3 t3
l3:14
t3li
t3 I6
t3 17
l3:18
l3il9
t3 20
l1:21
l3:22
l3:23
l3:24
t3 25
I 3:26
13.21
I 3:28
t1:29
I 3:30
l3:ll
l3:J2
l3:14
l91 0
l9t 0
l9t 0
191.0
l91 0
l91 0
l9r.t
r91 0
l9t I
l9t.t
t9t 0
l9l. t
l9t. t
l9t.0
l9t 0
191.0
191.0
191.0
l9l. r
l9l .l
l9l 0
r91 0
l91 0
l9t 0
l9t I
t91 0
l9t 0
t9t 0
l9t 0
l9t I
l9l I
l9l I
l9t 0
l9t 0
l9t 0
l9t 0
l9l 0
r9t 0
l9t 0
l9t I
l9t 0
l9t 0
l9t.0
l9t 0
l9t 0
l9l 0
l9r.0
l91 0
l9l.l
l9t.l
l9l.l
l9l.0
191.0
191.0
191.0
191.0
l9l.0
l9l. t
l9l.l
l9l I
0.860
0.860
0.850
0 860
0 860
0.860
0 860
0 860
0.860
0.50
0.8i0
0.850
0.860
0.860
0.860
0s0
0.860
0.860
0.s0
0 860
0.860
0.860
0.s0
0.s0
0.s0
0.860
0.860
0.860
0.860
0.860
0.860
0.s0
0.s0
0.50
050
0 860
0.860
0.860
0.860
0.60
0.s0
0.850
0.860
0.860
0.s0
0.s0
0 860
0.860
0 860
0.860
0.860
0.r0
0.b0
0.60
0.860
0.860
0.860
0.860
0.60
0 860
1.384.9
1,194.5
1,390.6
r,392.0
r,395.1
1,399 4
1.388. I
1.393.0
1,385.4
1,02.I
1,396.9
r,389.2
r,388.5
r,387.6
l.4t 3.0
1,433.8
1,438.1
|,431.9
|,M2_3
1,43.8
1.438.4
1,48t 0
1,491.0
1,479.1
1,66.5
1.48 t.8
t.413.9
1.478.0
1.496.5
1.52 t.l
1,519.7
l.5t 7.0
I.S02.2
1,478.6
1.505.2
1.52 t.8
1.495.5
1,529. I
r,531.4
1.539. I
1.541.6
t.490.2
|,415.2
1,490.8
t.496.7
t.497.9
1,480. I
|,84.7
t,470.2
1.490.6
1,484 9
1,504.5
1,473.5
t.61.4
|,443.7
1,438.6
1.40.8
1.30 t.6
l6
2.9
23.6
234
236
215
231
23.9
23t
236
23.t
23_9
23.4
23.4
23.5
214
23.9
24.5
24.5
245
250
24.6
24.3
25.5
252
258
25.0
25.3
25.4
254
25.1
263
26.2
26.6
258
250
264
26.2
268
264
26.4
21 t)
25.5
255
251
257
26.3
25.1
256
25.7
251
251
255
24.6
24.5
246
a.r
0_!
13.8
44.t
456
441
433
44_3
44_t
43.9
44.3
43.0
44.4
45 1
41.4
43.9
44_4
44.0
416
45.2
45.1
44_4
45. I
44.6
450
451
44.9
44.4
45.1
44.5
46 I
46. I
46.4
4i.8
45.O
44.2
44_4
463
44.8
459
465
46.5
45.9
46t
45.9
45.i
44_4
44.8
45.0
46.5
46_O
44_6
44.9
44.9
41.0
45.0
44.9
44.4
44.8
4t.6
9.2
1.9
€48
41 5
M12
418
446 |
447 I
434
u51
&47
469
448 I
446 9
441 5
446 I
452 1
454 1
457 7
460. I
457 6
458 4
459 I
619
469 1
612
614
468. I
6i5
65.1
414 a
416.2
416.2
416.8
472.1
468.0
411 1
479 2
4126
480 9
480.3
480.0
419 5
41 t.7
410 0
41t S
41 t.O
47 t.0
470 0
472 I
664
468.9
468. I
471 9
168 3
462.O
458 4
458 5
455_7
404_2
3.1
l. t
@.2
60.2
60.5
60.5
cn.2
59.9
@1
60.6
&.1
a1
4.1
606
a4
4.2
59.0
58.6
51.9
s1.6
51.2
51.2
569
i58
56 I
i63
5.5
560
56. I
J60
55r
546
54.4
54.0
i4.l
544
542
53 I
544
531
542
51.9
53.8
55.1
54.4
548
54.8
541
55.4
555
53.2
55.2
5i2
55.4
557
57.4
51.6
57.8
58.2
53.1
9f
af,
24_O
21.5
252
245
21.7
244
22.6
230
232
23.1
23_l
23.2
23.3
23.2
23.6
23.6
21.8
23-9
237
231
24.1
24.3
24_a
24.1
24.1
23.9
23.8
24.3
24.2
23.8
24.7
245
246
246
236
245
23 I
24.4
24.5
24.1
23_7
25.0
24.6
230
219
24.1
23.1
230
23.0
24.0
23.4
24t
24.5
21.5
24_4
23.3
225
209
32
55r
l0 I
102
105
to2
10.0
10.3
10. I
l0.l
10.3
9_9
to.2
r0.4
r0.0
r0.0
10.2
10.0
9.9
10.3
10. I
10. I
l0 2
10.0
10.0
I O.l
99
99
to.2
99
10.3
t0.0
10.0
l0 0
9.9
99
98
l0 2
99
10.0
10. I
10.0
9.8
10.2
10.0
100
99
10.0
10.0
I 0.2
r 0.l
9.9
t0.0
10.0
t0.3
10.0
I 0.2
t0.I
I0.0
97
2.9
0.6
27 of87
AImrrcB
TT{:F,i NI$AL ilNNI,':
Method I Data
htion C€ntral Wrhr Reluation
Soure Jqbtfter#2
Prejd No. AST-2023-{301
Dre l2ll5l23
Dud Orietrbrion: Vcfliol
Dud D6ign: Cimlil
DifiM fmE Fs Wdl tu Outtide of Pod: 26.m in
ttipptc tc,gtt: ----6-- h
DepthofDud: 2m in
Crcs Sdiond AEr of Drct: 218 ft'
No of Teil Potu: 2
NuBbcrofRqfingspcrPoint: I
Dillme A. l-l ft
Dinre A Duct Dirmen:----i--1*"t be' 0.5;
,rr,** r,----l]-n
Dinre B Dud Diemt6,--ll-t*"t u' ft
MiddumNumbeofTnveePoink: 16
Acto.l Numbe.ofTilYe* Poifts: 16
MeauE Onitid ed lrate): _-_lE!_
Rcvi.rycr (Idtisl md Dat€): RBB
r mvLGL run r!
Nanbo oltw poina oa a IM
I
3
I
5
6
1
8
9
l0
ll
3 5 6 1 f 9 ll l2lo
t4.6-6_7-t.J-3.2-2.6-2.1
85.4-25.0-l{.6-10.5-8.2-6.7
750 - 29.6 - 19.4 - 14.6 - ll.8
.." 1,lll iit il'tii
.Percentof iack dimeterton inside wall to tMrse Wint
Poina
'/. of
Diretq fmm i[ide
wrll
fmm
oftide of
I
3
I
5
6
7
8
9
l0
ll
t2
1.2
10.5
l9.t
12.1
611
806
89.5
:'
0.6{
2.10
3.88
6.{6
I 3.5.'
16.12
17.90
19.36
6.6J
t.l0
9.88
12.16
19.54
22.12
23.m
25.16
Shck Diagnm
A= 1.1fi.
B=1.1fr.
Deplh ofDucl = 20 in.
Coss Sctioml Area
oaaaaaoa
FIF1AIIalrce
TTfii-I T'lCAL {}il d)IJT
Cyclonic Flow Check
Location Central Valley Water Reclamation (CVWR)
Source Jenbacher#2
Project No. AST-20234301
Date l2ll5l23
Sample Point Angle (AP=O)
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
l0
ll
t2
l3
t4
l5
16
Average
5
4
2
2
0
I
3
5
8
6
2
3
I
8
8
t2
4.4
29 of87
&::tr,
AtIialmEr
l,til]r{
Field Data
Method 2Dila
Location Central Vallev Water Reclamation (CV\trR)
Source Jenbacher #2
Project No. AST-2023-4J01
Run No
Datr
Statur
Start Tim(
Stop Timr
Lsk Checl
t
12fi5/23
YALID
9:50
'10:02
Pass
)
t2^5123
VALID
I l:07
12:12
Pass
3
t2^st23
VALID
13.20
l3:26
Pass
Ave
Traverse Poinl AP
(in. wC)
Ts
fr)
AP
(in. wC)
Ts
cF)
AP
(in. wC)
Ts
cF)
I
a
3
4
5
6
7
8
I
)
3
1
5
6
7
8
95
l0
20
30
30
30
l0
00
88
92
95
00
l0
00
00
95
335
338
339
339
340
340
341
341
336
338
339
340
341
342
342
342
90
00
00
l0
l0
00
00
84
79
85
00
20
30
20
l0
95
337
338
340
340
341
341
341
342
335
340
341
341
342
342
343
343
88
95
00
l0
l0
20
l0
00
96
99
l0
00
l0
l0
82
88
337
338
340
340
341
34t
341
342
335
340
341
341
342
342
343
343
Square Root of AP, (in. WC)t/2 (aP)"'
Average AP, in. WC (AP)
Pitot Tub€ Coefficient (Cp)
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (Pb)
Static Pressure, in. WC (Pg)
Stack Pressur€, in. Hg (Ps)
Average Temperature, oF (Ts)
Average Temperature, oR (Ts)
MeasuredMoistureFraction (BWSmsd)
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat)
Moisture Fraction (BWS)
02 Concentration, 7o (O2)
CO2 Concentration, 7o (CO2)
Iolecular Weight, lb/lb-mole (dry) (Md)
lolmular Weight, lb/lb-mole (wet) (Ms)
Velocity, fvsec (Vs)
VFR at stack conditions, acfm (Qa)
VFR at standard conditions, sclh (Qsw)
VFR at standard conditions, scfm (Qsw)
FR at standard conditions, dscfm (Qsd)
1.030
1.07
0.840
25.88
1.00
25.95
339.4
799.1
0. l0l
1.000
0. l0l
I 1.58
6.64
29.53
28.36
77.1
10,090
346,769
5 119
5,1 96
1.008
1.02
0.840
25.88
l. l0
25 96
340.4
800. l
0.101
L000
0.101
n.44
6.68
29.s3
28.36
75.5
9,877
339,129
5 6t',)
5 081
L007
1.02
0 840
25.88
l.l0
25.96
340.4
800. I
0.098
1.000
0 098
I 1.43
6.64
29 52
28.39
75.4
9,867
338,77'7
5,646
s oo1
1.015
1.03
0.840
25.88
1.07
25.96
340. l
799.7
0.100
1.000
0 100
I 1.5
6.7
29.52
28.37
76.0
9,945
34 1,558
5,693
s.123
30 of87
3l ofET
,4- "^d/AllialpE!
Emissions Calculations
Location Central Valley Water Reclamation (CVWR)
Source Jenbacher #4
Project No. AST-2023-4301
Rrrn Number Run I Run 2 Rnn 3
t2/t4t23 t2/t4/21 12114/21
I I 03 12:25 14:00
1203 ll25 15:00
)ate
itan Time
itop Time
Drt,
lngine Manufactrrer
ingine Model
ingine Serial Number
lngine Type
lngine Date of Manufacturer
lneine Hour Meter Readins
DOM
EMR
GE
JMS 612-F28F02
1322446
Compression lgnition
20 I 8-0 l-0 I
7,931
lngine Exhaust TempeEture, "F
ienerator Output, Hz
ingine Sped, RPM
ingine Brake Work, HP
v,luimum Brake Work. IIP
ingine Load, oZ
\mbient Tempqature
telative Humidity, %
l,romerric Preis'rre in Ho
Gen OP
ES
EBW
MaxEBW
EL
RH
ph
980 975 965 973
60 60 60 60
1,500 1,500 r,500 1,500
2,4t4 2,416 2,415 2,415
2,509 2,509 2,509 2,509
96 96 96 96
50 55 60 55
)5 l5 40 3't
25 92 25.92 25 92 25.92
Input Data - Oudet
vloisture Fraction, dimensionless
y'olumetric Flow Rate (Ml-4), dscfm
BWS
Qs
0.105
d orl
0 lot 0.104 0.103
5.024 4.964 4,969
Calcuhted Data - Outlet
), Concentntion, To dry c", 1120 tt25 ll20 t1.22
lO, Concentration, oz dry cco, 6.50 6.62 6.49 6.54
FTIR Calculated Dat,
vlethane - Outlet Concentmtion, ppmvd
lethane - Outlet Conentmtion, ppmvw
lethane - Outlet ConentEtion, ppmvd @ l5 % O2
'4ethane - Outla Emision Rate, lb/hr
{ethane - Oudet Emission Rate, ton/yr
!,lethane - Outlet Emission Factor, g/HP-hr
Ccr.
C"r.*
Ccs.tr
ER.".
ERcs.rpr
EF.r.
t299 22 1433 87
t162.49 1289. I I
790.55 876.43
15.99 18.01
10.02 78.86
300 338
t64t.07 1458.05
1470.78 t307 46
998.25 888.41
20.36 1812
89.18 '19.36
3 82 3.40
Ithane - Outlet Concentrrion, ppmvd
Ithane - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd (as C3H8)*
Ithane - Outlet Concentrtion, ppmvw
Ithane - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd @ l5 % O,
Ithane - Outlet Emission Rate, lb,/hr
Ithane - Outlet Emission Rate, ton/yr
Ithane - Outlet Emission Factor. e/HP-hr
22.69 24.80
t4.97 t6.3'7
20.30 22.30
t3.80 15.16
0.52 0.58
,ro ,<K
0.10 0.1 1
Cc,s.
c.,r"
C",n.*
C.rr.,,
ERc,a.
ER.mr"r
EF.,H.
28.26 25.25
18.65 t6.67
25.13 22.64
17.19 r5.39
0.66 0.59
2.88 2.58
0.12 0.I I
rormaldehyde - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
romaldehyde - Outlet Concentration, ppmvw
;omaldehyde - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd @ 15 o/o O,
rormaldehyde - Outlet Emission Rate, lb/hr
;ormaldehyde - Outlet Emission Rate, ton/yr
;omaldehyde - Outlet Emission Facbr. c/HP-hr
Cauo,t
Ccrrou*
C"uor.,,
ERcnoa
ER.rorr",
EF.,,^,,
44 67
39.97
27.t8
1.03
4.51
0.19
44.51 51.71 4698
40.01 46.34 42.13
21 24 1 1.45 28 61
1.05 1.20 r.09
4.59 5 26 4.79
0.20 0.23 0.21
)O - Oudet Concenration, ppmvd
lO - Outlet Concenration, ppmvd @ l5 % Ou
lO - Outlet Emission Rate, lb/hr
lO - Outlet Emission Rate, ton/yr
lO - Outlet Emission Factor, g,4lP-hr
C".
C.o",,
ER"o
ERcoer
EFco
349.29
236.88
8.37
36.64
t.57
4t6 64 453 09 4t9.61
254.66 215.61 255.72
9.14 9.82 9lt
40.02 43.00 19.88
t.72 1.84 |.7t
{Ox - Outlet Con@ntEtion, ppmvd
,{Ox - Outla Conentmtion, ppmvd @ l5 % Or
,IOx - Outlet Emission Rate, lb/hr
{Ox - Outlei Emi$ion Rate, ton/yr
{Ox - Outlet Emission Factor. i/HP-hr
58.97
35.94
210
9.20
0.19
65.90 61.56 49.4s
40.10 37.63 30.08
2 33 2.22 t.'76
10.19 9.71 1.71
0.44 0.42 0 33
C*o*
C^*o".r r
ERro.
ERro.*t
EF.,^..
/OC - Outlet Concentmtion, ppmvd
/OC - Outld Conentmtion, ppmvd @ l5 % Oz
/OC - Outlet Emission Rate, lb,&r
r'OC - Outlet Emission Rate, ton/yr
/OC - Outlet Emission Factor, g/HP-hr
Cro"
Cvoc.ts
ERvoc
ERt**t
EFve
20.20 20.64 22.73 2t.t9
t2.29 t2.62 13.82 12.91
0 68 0.7t 0.78 0.72
2.99 3.12 3.40 3.t7
0B 0r3 0t5 0t4
{MHC - Outlet ConcentEtion, ppmvd
,IMHC - Outlet Conentmtion, ppmvd @ l5 % O,
,IMHC - Outlet Emission Rate, lb/hr
,IMHC - Outlet Emission Rate, ton/yr
'IMHC - Outlet Emission Factor- s/HP-hr
cxrurcr*cuo 35.t7 37.01 41 38 3786
CNMrrc('scaHstsri 21.40 22.62 25.17 23.01
ERrunco.ossi l.l9 t.za I 41 129
ERuru"G"cru*)r", 521 5.60 6 18 566
EF".,,,..,"."."", 0.22 0.24 027 0.24
32 of 8'l
RlImrur"rBrJNr r:.&l f::a11ttD
Run 1- RM Data
Locrai@,
(nmrm.IanharherM
Projet No.: AST-20234301
Tim
Unit
Or - Outlet COr - Outleao/..!ry '/.dry
Uncorr.ctcd Run Averagc (C.6)
C.l Grs Con.ertrrtion (CMA)
Preacst Syst.m Zero Response
P6ttcst System Zero Rerpons.
Av.rage Z.ro Response (Co)
Prctesa System Crl R.sponse
P6tt$t Syrtcm Crl R.sporo.
Average Crl R$ponsc (CM)
I l:03
I l:04
I l:05
I l:06
I l:07
I l:08
ll:09
I l:10
ll:ll
l l:12
I l:13
I l:14
I l:15
I l:16
t l:17
llit8
I l:19
I li20
l!:21
l\:22
I l:23
llt24
I l:25
llt26
ll:27
I li28
I l:29
I l:30
I l:31
I l:32
I l:33
I l:34
ll135
I l:36
I l:37
I l:38
I l:39
lli40
I l:41
I l:42
I l:43
I l:44
I l:45
I lr46
I l:47
I l:48
I l:49
I l:50
I l:51
ll:52
ll:53
I l:54
I l:55
I l:56
I l:57
I l:58
I l:59
l2:00
l2:01
l2:02
t1.20
12.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
12.00
t2.00
12.00
6.52
I 1.96
0.00
0.00
0.00
t2.00
12.00
12.00
ll.12
tt.t2
I l.l2
I l.12
I l.12
I l.12
I l.13
I l.13
I l.ll
I l.13
I l.13
I l.14
I l.16
I l.l5
I t.l5
Il.t5
I l.l4
I l.15
I t.l6
I 1.15
I r.t6
I 1.16
I l.l6
I Ll7
I l.l6
I I.t7
I 1.17
I t.t8
I t.t8
I Ll8
I Ll8
I 1.20
I t.20
il.19
I l.2r
I 1.20
I l.2l
tt.22
I l.2l
tt.22
I l.2l
tt.22
I l.2t
I 1.20
I 1.20
11.21
tt.22
tt.26
tt.27
I 1.30
I 1.32
I 1.32
t 1.33
I I.35
I 1.35
I 1.35
I t.36
I 1.36
I 1.37
I 1.36
6.52
6.51
6.51
6.51
6.52
6.52
6.52
6.52
6.52
6.52
6.53
6.53
6.52
6.53
6.53
6.53
6.54
6.53
6.54
6.55
6.54
6.54
6.54
6.53
6.53
6.54
6.54
6.53
6.53
6.52
6.52
6.52
6.54
6.53
6.52
6.53
6.53
6.53
6.54
6.55
6.55
6.55
5.55
6.53
6.51
6.50
6.44
6.47
6.47
6.47
6.47
6.47
6.47
6.46
6.47
6.46
6.41
33 of 87
Runl-FTIRData
AlMT!3*ilSl ff.&L ,:itf il
lraraion:
Source:
Prejet No.:
Datc:
Time
Utrit
MDL
Temperrlurc Proure
'C .tm
Mcthrne - Ortlet Ethene - Outlet Fomrldehyde - Outl€t CO - Outler
ppmvw ppmvw ppml? ppmr'd
0.0t 0.08 0.08 0.13
NOr - Ourl€l VOC - Orrld BWS - Outlet
ppmrd ppmvd o/o (wet\
o.11 0.28
I l:03
I l:0.{
I l:05
ll:ffi
I l:07
I l:08
I l:09
I l:10
ll:ll
ll:12
ll:ll
ll:lt
I I:15
ll:16
I l:17
lIr18
l l:19
ll:20
I l:21
tt-22
ll:23
ll.2l
ll:25
ll:26
ll:21
1l:28
ll:29
ll:30
I l:3I
ll:12
ll:33
ll:34
ll:35
lI:36
lI:37
llr3E
I I:19
I l:.t0
I l:.ll
ll:42
I l:{3
I lr{l
llr{5
I lr+6
llr{7
I l:48
I l:19
I l:50
ll:51
I l:52
ll:51
ll:51
Il:55
ll:56
ll:57
ll:5E
ll:59
t2:m
l2:0I
12:O2
l2:03
191.1
I9I,+
191.1
t9l.i
l9l.{
191.1
191.4
191.1
l9 1.1
191.4
l9t.4
191.1
191.1
l9l.4
l9l.4
191.4
l9l r
l9l 4
l9l I
t9t.t
t9t.1
191.4
191.1
I9l.l
l9l.l
t 9l.t
I9I,]
I9I J
l9l.l
l9l..l
l9t.l
l9l..t
l9l.l
l9l.l
l9l.l
l9l .t
l9l.4
191.4
191.4
191.4
l9l.+
191.4
l9t.t
191.4
191.4
l9 r.r
I9I,{
I9I,{
I9I,{
I9I,{
l9 L3
l9 t.{
l9 L{
l 9L{
l9l.l
t 9t.{
t 9t.J
t 9l.l
l9l.l
t9t.3
19 t.3
0.839
0.838
0.810
0.810
0.8{0
0.816
0.837
0.838
0.837
0.819
0.840
0.83 8
0.836
0.837
0.838
0.E37
O.E3E
0.E17
0.E37
0.835
0.816
0.817
0.816
0.837
0.83E
0.E36
0.E37
0.835
0.838
0.835
0.837
0.837
0.817
0.81 7
0.81 7
0.83 7
0.836
0.836
0.t35
0.E36
0.El+
0.835
0.836
0 836
0.831
0.835
0.835
0.835
0.t35
0.835
0.835
0.831
0.836
0.83t
0.81r
0.835
0.835
0.831
0.83 5
0.835
0.83J
L161.3
t.t73 2
l. I 7.1.5
l.176.9
I,184.1
l.173.1
l. l6{.0
1. ll1.9
t. t{7.8
l.l62.l
t.167. I
t.t55.1
I.166.0
I.169.1
1.160.0
1.165.7
l.t{3.0
1.I36.2
1.142.6
1.141. I
l.l5l.5
1.r53.?
l.l5l.2
1.159.6
l.lJE.3
1.130.6
l.l{7.I
l.l{0.2
1.il9.0
l.130. I
I.t23.l
I. I{8.9
t. r15.9
t.t22.9
I. I 51.9
1.1I l.l
1.115.0
l.l57.l
l.t3t.l
1.137 9
l.i 14.7
l.l2?.0
l.l lt.l
l.106.2
l.l03.l
t.t22.5
t.tzt.1
1.155. I
1.178.8
1.205.0
1.2 16.8
t,230.2
t.2 13.6
t.238.2
1.2t4.0
t.222.t
t.2J7.6
t.236.2
1.235.0
t.221.5
1.230.{
2t.6
2t.3
21.2
2t.3
2t.6
2l.t
2L0
20.3
20.1
20.1
20.E
20.6
20.1
21.0
20.1
20.8
20.5
20.1
20.0
19.8
20.5
20.2
20.5
20.6
20.2
t 9.5
t9.9
20.0
19.l
l9.3
l9.3
19.8
19.7
t92
19.5
18.6
t9.6
t9.1
t 9.3
19.6
t8.8
18.5
1E.8
I8.t
19.1
l9.l
19.8
19.6
20.6
2t.0
21.1
20.7
2t.l
2t.7
2t.l
2t.l
2t.2
2t.5
2t.6
2L0
2Ll
+0.3
41.7
4 1.0
38.7
38.3
38.3
{0.{
{3.1
t2.l
4t_2
,lLl
10.8
399
t0.0
39.8
19.1
39.6
40.5
40.5
+02
{15
{0 I
195
I 8..t
31.1
17.6
31.7
t0.l
39.1
39.5
J{.9
t0.5
39.1
39.1
3E.9
]E,E
40.2
.t0 0
18.8
18.8
39.4
39.8
{0.J
{0.9
+6.0
10..t
19.5
39.6
38.1
39.2
39.1
18.6
39.2
10.1
41.3
39.1
-10.1
39.1
39.{
19.1
19.0
393.6
396.8
l9{.1
392.3
391.9
19 1.5
392_O
347.9
389.1
39 1.8
392.9
389 I
39 1.0
39 1.7
388.3
391.1
385.7
38+.2
38{.0
t85.9
38? 0
3E6, I
3E{. I
3E7. I
384.2
379.8
383.t
381.1
319.1
3a2.9
382.0
fa7.7
386.8
379.5
385.5
3El.{
3E5,J
381.9
380 7
385 6
382.6
383.2
380.0
371.4
37a.1
378.1
380.5
390.1
390.9
t00.{
l9l.{
101.9
19l.l
-109.3
199.5
{06.9
{00.J
398 J
&6{
196.2
407.8
63.1
63.3
6J.0
il,E
64.1
6{.9
64.1
65.8
65.8
65.5
65.0
6.2
65.6
65.t
657
6.t
67.0
61.2
67.O
61.5
61.1
&.6
67 _6
61.t
67.2
68.1
67.9
67.6
67.9
67.8
68.3
61 .3
tr.{
68.5
61.1
61.6
61.6
66.8
68.0
61.1
68.{
68.0
64.2
6t.6
1t.3
69.9
69 _3
6.3
6.7
61.2
62.8
62.9
62.6
6t.2
62_O
6t.2
6L9
6t.r
6t.7
61.8
60.9
2 t.l
20.2
20.1
2r.3
20.8
19.8
20.7
19.8
l9.l
21.9
20.6
t9.8
t9.9
I9.9
20. I
19.1
19.9
19.1
21.0
20.9
l9.l
19.1
t9.2
20.0
l8.l
2r l
19.5
19.9
20.2
20.0
18.5
21. I
l9.l
20.8
20. I
21.2
I8.7
t97
l8.t
18.6
21.2
19.5
20.0
I 8.9
19.3
199
t9.8
70.1
20.9
t9.1
2t.2
2L0
20.8
2t.2
2t.3
201
2 1.0
20.6
20.7
10.7
10.9
10.7
l0 I
10.0
t02
10.6
l l.l
I 1.0
lo.8
10.8
10.7
106
10.7
10.6
t0.6
t0.7
t0.7
t0.6
10.5
10.5
10.3
l0.t
10.1
I0.2
I0.2
10.3
t0.8
10.7
107
I 1.3
10.7
t0.6
10.7
t0.5
10.4
10.{
10.3
10.{
107
t0.E
t0.9
10.9
I l.l
I 1.6
t 0.5
l0.l
l0 5
l0.l
10..1
10.2
10.0
lo.2
10..1
10.6
l0.l
10.1
10.2
10.0
l0.l
9.9
34 of 87
Alffirce
TECHN!CAL GROIJP
Run2-RMData
Locrtion: Central
Tire
Unit
Sartus
12t25
l2:26
l2:21
12t28
l2:29
l2:30
l2:31
12132
l2:13
l2:34
l2:35
l2:36
l2:31
l2:38
12.39
12t40
l2:41
l2:42
l2:43
l2:44
l2:45
l2:46
l2:47
l2:48
l2:49
l2:50
l2:5 I
l2:52
l2:53
l2:54
t2:55
t2:56
17,5'7
l2:58
12,59
l3:00
l3:01
l3:02
l3:03
l3:04
l3:05
l3:06
l3:07
l3:08
l3:09
t3: l0
l3:l I
I3:12
l 3:13
t3: l4
l3:1 5
l3:1 6
l3:17
l3rt8
l3:1 9
l3:20
I3:21
l3:22
l3:23
l3:24
6.58
6.59
6.60
6.62
6.62
6.62
6.60
6.61
6.61
6.62
6.63
6.63
6.6r
6.62
6.65
6.65
6.64
6.63
6.64
6.63
6.63
6.64
6.65
6.62
6.63
6.63
6.65
6.70
6.70
6.72
6.73
6.68
6.62
6.64
6.68
6.69
6.68
6.69
6.71
6.73
6.71
6.13
6.68
6.48
6.53
6.63
6.67
6.64
6.44
6.45
6.39
6.40
6.30
6.28
6.38
6.39
6.36
6.4t
6.31
6.2t
I r.l8
12.00
0.08
000
0.04
I 1.86
12.00
I t.93
1t.25
t t.l6
ll.t5
I r.l5
t l.t3
ll.l4
I L16
r l.l7
I t.t8
ll.l7
I t.l7
I l.16
I l.16
t l.l8
I l.t7
I l.l5
t l.16
I l.t7
I l.l8
I t.l8
I l.t9
I 1.20
I l.19
I l.19
tt.22
I 1.20
u20
I l.l8
ll.ll
I 1.08
I 1.04
r 1.04
I r.08
u. t6
I l.l3
I l.l0
t 1.08
I 1.07
I 1.03
I l.0l
ll.0I
I 1.02
r0.98
I 1.05
I l.3l
tt.z3
r t.09
I 1.04
I 1.07
I t.33
tt.29
I 1.38
I 1.35
I1.49
I 1.49
I 1.36
t 1.34
I 1.36
I l.3t
I 1.43
I t.54
0.08
0.00
0.04
11.72
12.00
I t.86
6.62
S^rra.. I.nhr.h.r &
P.ojcct No.:
D^t , l2/14D3
Or - Outlet CO; - Outlei
'/c .,ry Vo dt!
Valid Valid
Uncorrcctcd Run Av.rrgc (C"b)
Csl Gas Conccntrrtion (CMA)
Prctcst Systcm Zero Respon$
P6ttest System Zaro R$pon$
Averrgc ro RespoM (Co)
PrctestSyltcm Cd Rdpons
P6tteit Syrtcm Cd Rcspoe
Avcrage Cll R.spotr. (CM)
Corrccted Ru
35 of87
anIffirrcefs*r-.{NicAL {ln(}up
Run2-FTIRData
Ircrtiotr: Cenlml Vrlle
Sourcq Jenbach€r #4
Pmj6t No.: AST-2023-.1301
Time
Unil
MDL
Saritrr
TempcratuE Prcsurc MethrBe - Outlel Eihme - Outlet tr'omaldehyde - Outlet CO - Outlat
'c .tm ppmvs ppmvw ppmvw ppmvd
0.0{ 0.08 0.08 0.ll
NOx - Oulht
ppmvd
o-7{
VOC - Olrld BWS - Outler
pp6vd o/r (qetl
0-28
t2.25
12.26
12..27
12:28
t2'.29
l2:30
t2..3t
t2'.32
t2.'.33
l2:3{
l2:15
l2:36
12,r7
l2:3E
12..39
l2:{0
l2:41
l2:12
12:13
12:41
l2:15
12:16
12:11
l2:.18
l2:49
l2:50
l2:51
12:52
12153
12:54
l2iJ5
12156
12:51
l2:58
12t59
l3:m
l3:01
13:O2
l3:03
l3:0{
l3:05
l3:06
l3:07
l3:08
l3:o9
l3:10
l3:ll
l3: ll
l3:u
l3: l5
l3:16
l3:l?
lSrlt
l3: t9
l3:20
l3i2l
13,22
l3:23
I 3 i2.t
13:25
t 91.3
19t.3
t9t.{
l9t.l
19t.3
t9t.l
19 t.3
191.3
l9l.2
l9t.l
l9L t
l 9L2
l9l I
l9l.l
t9l.l
t9t. I
t 9t.l
191.2
l9t.l
l9t.l
t9l.l
l9l.l
l9l.l
l9l.l
l9l.l
191.0
l9l. I
191.2
I 9 l..l
191.1
191.1
191.3
l9t.J
l9l.l
l9l.J
l9l.J
l9l.l
191.2
191.4
l9l_{
191.5
191.5
191.5
191.5
19t.5
191.5
l9I.{
I9I,4
191.4
I9l.{
19I.4
19I.4
I9I,4
I9I,4
191.4
19I.{
19 t.4
191.3
191.3
l9l.3
0.810
0.83 I
0.83t
0.832
0.E30
0.E32
0.E33
0.832
0.E33
0.834
0.833
0.833
0.830
0.831
0.812
0.830
0.830
0.829
0.829
0.830
0.828
0.829
0.830
0.829
0.831
0.832
0.834
0.833
0.832
0.83.t
0.83{
0.835
0.836
0.836
0.83t
0.t39
0.t38
0.t19
0.840
0.83t
0.839
0.84 l
0.810
0.84 t
0.840
0.842
0.t41
0.8,1 1
0.84t
0.8{3
0.841
0.842
0.845
0.842
0.842
0.8{3
0.84{
0.8{3
0.8.12
0.E42
1,230.1
1.226.t
1.2 I6.5
t,206.7
1,205.9
1.194.3
1.2 18.6
L236.6
1.274.2
1,236.2
1.2 I l.,l
1.20t.6
1.210.5
L167.9
I,153.7
1.r69.7
1.157.6
1.178.3
1.175.0
l. l9 l.{
1.199.0
1.197.3
1.180.2
l.2l l.l
1.188.6
1.169.5
1.169.{
t.t22.3
1.085.9
1.048.1
1.056.8
1.09{.1
l.l?8.9
l.l{8.5
l. r 17.3
t.129.1
l.l t6.8
1,0t5.6
1.0t6.8
1.091.2
1.091.8
1.o12.2
l.l1l.9
1.459.3
1.369.,,
1.211.6
I,195.8
1.521.8
1.554.9
l.rJ0.{
1.6 t0.0
1.805.3
l.82t.l
1.690.0
1.599.6
t.7m.5
1.565.5
1,758.3
1,952.8
1.9{5.7
21.9
2L.5
2t.5
2t.3
20.9
20.8
20.9
2t.1
21.1
2t.5
20.9
20.1
20.4
20.2
19.6
19.7
19.5
20. I
205
20.2
20.5
20.1
20.3
20.8
20.3
19.8
20.0
18.3
11.1
t1.0
t1.2
11.9
20.0
t9.1
18.7
r8.3
18.2
t1.6
t1.1
17.8
t1 .1
11.6
t9.1
25.5
24.0
20.3
20.2
21 .1
28.0
29.O
33.4
13.9
30.1
2t.0
30.?
27.t
12.t
35.1
35.E
33.6
3 1.9
32.{
32.O
32.3
36_6
3t.2
33.2
3l.l
32.9
ll.?
31.6
31.8
t3.1
+0.6
t6.1
31.1
38.0
38.2
10.1
38.5
10.1
10.2
39.5
40.6
40.8
38.6
38. t
38.1
11.5
3 8.1
10.2
3 9.0
42.1
39.9
3 9.6
39.9
39.2
{0.0
10.2
12.6
11.3
{ 1.6
4{.3
13.7
{L6
{0.6
13.1
J5. I
{{.5
{5.9
+6.t
t1.3
11.6
{6.4
+1.2
16.1
11.1
49.8
50.1
390.2
391.2
385.6
39 1.9
l9l.l
395.0
395.8
390.8
395.9
389.2
192.9
t9 1.9
,1o2.6
196.5
39 1.6
388.1
388.5
394.0
39 t.7
399.8
398.0
399.3
396.{
403.6
398.0
393.4
390.7
317.8
169.6
360.6
362.1
171.8
391.6
389.6
383.7
38 r.7
380_2
370.7
313.6
,11.1
182.8
31 1.6
389.8
458.{
{10.0
395..1
.t00.0
111.6
411.1
113.5
487.8
531.9
536.8
505.0
.t8{.7
5r3.5
111.0
523.3
58 1.2
511.8
63.1
64.2.
6{.8
6.O
65.6
61.4
6.1.4
63.8
6.1. I
63.9
65.7
65.9
64.5
6.2
61.0
6.9
6.7
&.2
66.6
64.9
65.2
65.1
66.0
63.6
65.1
65.5
6.6
7l.0
11.1
11.5
71.t
72.1
6.t.5
67 .t
67.9
69.0
70.0
73.0
12.8
12.t
69.E
73.8
4.1
t9. t
55.2
62.1
66.0
17.6
47.3
48.5
45.6
39.8
38.5
43.1
45.4
{1.3
6.2
m.6
36.3
36.1
It.3
Ir. I
18.8
18. I
l9.l
t9.1
18.7
18.0
lE.7
19.5
I 7.9
18.0
19.5
19.8
20.4
18.6
18.9
r8.6
20.r
20.9
t9.t
19.6
19.5
20.4
20.5
19.8
l9.l
20.1
19.5
18.?
19.3
It.9
t9.2
19.{
70.5
19.9
18.{
lE.6
19..1
lE.l
2l.l
19.5
18.6
71.t
20.2
t9.1
2,1. t
23.0
24.0
24.0
26.8
26.8
21.5
24.4
24.9
23.4
24.1
21.1
26.8
8.8
t.3
8.7
8.5
8.1
9.6
8.8
8.9
8.6
8.7
8.5
t.5
lo.2
I 1.6
10.6
9.1
10.0
10.0
I0.l
lo.6
l0.l
l0.l
t0.6
l0.l
lo.l
lo.1
to.l
to.l
lo.l
r0.2
t0.{
10.5
t0.3
u.3
10.6
10.4
10.7
I0.6
I0.9
I0.9
I2.0
I I.4
I 1.2
10.9
10.6
t0.5
10.5
10.6
t0.3
10.3
10.2
10.2
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.3
to.2
l0.l
l0.t
10.0
Metrme - Outkt Eftrm - Oufler - Outlet CO - Outl€l
36 of87
alIffirceTr{iilN,cAL *p$t}r
Run3-RMData
Loa"ti-t
Sourm: Jenbacher #4
Prejdt No.:
D.t :
Tim
Unit
0r - Outlct COr - Outlet
'/.d.f 'Adrf
Uncorrecaed Run Avcregc (C.r)
C.l G.s Concenarrtion (CMA)
Prctest System Z€ro Rcspoor
P6ttcst System Zcrc Rclponsc
Avcrrg. Z.ro RespoEG (Co)
Prtcat Syst m Cd Rqponsc
Pcttcrl System Cd Rcsporoe
Avcragc Cal Rcspomc (Cy)
l4:00
l4:01
I4:02
l4:03
t4:04
l4:05
l4:06
l4:07
l4:08
l4:09
l4:10
l4ilt
l4:12
l4ill
l4: l4
l4:15
l4i l6
l4:17
l4:18
l4: l9
l4:20
l4:21
l4:22
l4:23
14,24
l4:25
14,26
14,27
l4:28
14,29
l4:30
l4:3 I
l4:)2
I4:33
l4:34
l4:35
l4:36
l4:37
l4:38
l4:19
l4:40
l4:41
l4:42
l4:43
14144
14145
l4:46
l4:47
l4:48
14149
l4:50
l4:5 I
14152
l4:53
l4:54
l4:55
l4:56
l4:57
l4:58
l4:59
I l.0l 6.43
t2.00 I 1.96
-0.10 0.03
0.00 0.00
-0.05 0.02
1 1.59 1 1.66
12.00 12.00
11.80 11.83
I 1.09
I 1.07
tl.07
I 1.07
I 1.07
I r.06
I 1.06
I 1.05
I 1.05
I 1.05
I 1.03
I t.05
I 1.04
I 1.03
I 1.03
I 1.03
I 1.02
I 1.02
I 1.02
I 1.02
I l.0t
I 1.02
I t.0t
tt.@
t 1.02
I 1.02
l 1.00
I 1.02
I l.0l
10.99
10.98
10.93
10.97
I l.0l
t0.99
t0.97
10.93
10.95
10.96
10.96
10.96
10.96
10.96
t0.97
10.99
I l.0l
10.99
10.98
10.99
r 1.00
I 1.00
10.99
I 1.02
I 1.02
I 1.00
10.98
10.98
10.94
10.94
I 1.00
6.39
6.40
6.41
6.41
6.42
6.42
6.42
6.41
6.42
6.41
6.42
6.42
6.42
6.42
6.43
6.43
6.44
6.44
6.43
6.43
6.43
6.42
6.42
6.43
6.42
6.43
6.43
6.42
6.42
6.44
6.44
6.46
6.45
6.42
6.42
6.41
6.46
6.45
6.45
6.46
6.45
6.45
6.45
6.45
6.42
6.42
6.43
6.43
6.42
6.42
6.42
6.42
6.40
6.40
6.41
6.43
6.43
6.45
6.45
6.41
37 of87
Run3-FTIRData
?**."1N'CAL Gn{}*,3
lrcrtioo:
Sotrfte Jenhacher#J
Pmist No.: AST-2023{
Drte:
Time
Unir
MDL
Straur
Temp.mtuft PBre Methane - Outlct Ethanc - Outl€t Formaldehyde - Outlet CO - Outl€l
rtm ppmvw ppmw ppnw ppmrd
0.0{ 0.08 0.0t 0.13
NOr - Outlct VOC - Outlet BWS - Outlcl
ppmrd ppmvd % (wet)
o-71 o-2E
l+:m
ll:01
li:02
l{:03
l4:04
1.1:05
1.1:06
l4;07
l4roE
l4:09
l4:t0
l4:ll
l{: t2
l{: l3
l.t: ll
l{;1 5
l{: l6
l{:1 7
l4:18
l4:19
ll:20
I{:2I
l1:22
t1:23
ll:2{
l.l:25
l!:26
l1:21
ll:28
l{:29
lJ:30
lli3l
11:32
l4:33
l4r3{
l4 i35
14r36
l4 i37
It r38
l+ i39
l{r40
l4:41
1.1:42
l4:.t3
l4:4{
l+:45
l.t:46
l.t:,17
ll:18
l4:.19
1+:50
ll:51
Ilr52
l{:53
l{:54
l{r55
I{:56
I{:57
I{:58
It:59
l5:m
t9t.2
191.3
l91 4
0.844
0.842
0.842
0.811
0.E{3
0.841
0.t{2
0.E{t
0.6{2
0.8{t
0.8{2
0.812
0.813
0 841
0.8{3
0.84I
0.8,15
0.8{l
0.8{3
0.8{2
0.8{3
0.811
0.8{{
0.840
0.812
0.812
0.842
0.u3
0.843
0.&2
0.813
0.8r1
0.812
0.812
0.8J1
0 8.il
0.813
0.813
0.81.1
0 842
0.8{2
0.8{3
0.8i3
0.8{5
0 8{3
0.t{3
0.E{3
0.t{3
0.8.t3
0.812
0.844
0.8,15
0.841
0.8{3
0.8.11
0.8{{
0.8.t{
0.8{3
0.813
0.8-12
0.843
520.{
501.9
517.8
5l1.6
il8.7
l9{.0
l?3 E
26.3
25.E
26.5
26.2
25.9
25.3
25.E
26.2
25.7
25.9
25.1
26.1)
25.9
25.1
25.2
25.5
21.9
2+.J
25.1
25.t
25.5
25.3
25.6
25.1
219
25.1
25.3
25. I
25.t
23.5
2t.6
25.5
25.6
25.2
23.9
24.1
21.6
21.2
21.9
21.8
217
25.0
25.2
268
25.9
25.1
25.6
26.o
26.0
25.5
26.1
26.1
26.O
u.5
21.7
2J. t
21.1
2.5.1
21.1
+80
47.1
16.1
11.9
18.5
15.9
52.2
50.9
52.0
50.0
{8.1
t5.7
11.7
.t5.8
15.3
{66
l6.l
t8.5
50.+
.l?.8
15.1
15.1
11.1
18.1
17.2
{7.0
J7.8
16.1
15.1
4{.3
+60
t5.{
4i.9
16.1
13.4
12..{
.t6.1
15.2
15.:]
{J.l
t2.l
{5.J
t2_1
t5.1
tl.2
t+_2
t6.8
15.1
t{.6
t3.8
16.8
{+.8
l+.1
{8.3
11.1
,t6.6
45.6
d1.6
11.5
{8.0
%17
+6 1.3
162.O
162.8
464.1
151 9
461.2
463.6
t61.2
16t.6
155 l
159 7
t51 I
r58 8
t52.2
{56 5
{{9.6
{55. r
sl I
{53.3
{51.2
-t53.3
{52.{
+5 1.9
{55.6
{59.1
J5{.0
158.9
J55.9
150.7
111.2
133.2
{{ r.?
{5?.I
+52.I
+15.8
113 I
t10.0
4.ll {
t.t0.l
+12 0
.t38.9
{t7.5
1t2.6
{50.9
{58 9
15 t.8
{J7.1
153.2
r56.5
{55.9
151.5
{60.5
J6l.l
{58.{
450.1
{52.5
ut_7
{19.{
.157.6
98.0
47.8
4E.6
48.3
48.2
J8.0
{9.0
i8.9
19.1
18.2
.t8.5
19.6
t8.6
48.5
48.7
49.4
190
19.6
{9.3
l8.E
r9.3
{9.{
{9.5
49.6
49.9
19.2
{90
19.1
48.0
48.9
49.8
50.3
52.6
50.6
{t.l
{9.{
50.5
52.3
5L6
50.7
5t.2
50.6
5l.l
50.5
50.3
19 I
*8.1
19.3
50.2
19.1
t8.9
,18.5
19.0
18.2
48.6
19.6
49.5
51.3
51.+
+8.7
50.6
22.6
22.8
21.6
27.t
22.1
21.9
tf .6
21.6
2l.o
23.1
21.8
22.2
22.3
22.t
23.1
20.9
23.3
221
235
22.3
22.2
22.5
23.t
22.7
23.1
23.2
23.1
23.t
22.8
2t.3
22.t
22.5
22.4
23.6
22.0
21.2
21.t
21.1
22.6
2 t.5
2t.1
224
221
225
21.t
22.2
23.0
23.5
2t.1
22.9
23.8
22.6
24.0
23.7
22.4
22.4
22.O
2t.9
22.t
2 I.8
10.3
to.2
l0.l
t0.{
t0.l
t02
I2.0
tt.2
I0.9
10.7
10.6
t0.l
lo.2
t0 I
l0.l
10.3
t0.t
u.l
I 1.0
t0.5
t0.2
l0.I
l0.I
10.8
10.5
t0.5
10.6
10.6
10.{
10.2
l0.l
t0.5
t0.{
10.3
10.{
9_9
9_9
I0.5
I0.l
t0.J
t0.2
9_9
10.3
9.9
10.1
10.2
lo.2
10.5
10.3
10.2
t0.l
10.5
l0 I
10.0
10.6
10.3
10.1
l0.J
t0.3
l0.t
t0.5
l9t
l9t
l9r
l9t
l9t
l9t
l9t
l9t
l9t
l9t
t9l
l9l
l9t
t.{87.1
1.486.0
1..195.8
l.{75.0
1.506.9
1..t9 l. I
1.199.1
l.{7{.8
l.{85.5
1.153.2
1.r56.0
1.t11.6
l.{68. r
1.J75.3
1..t78.1
1.175.1
1..15E.9
l.t8l.0
1.t93.5
t.11t.1
1.49{.7
I.186.8
t.{6{.3
I.457.6
I.39L9
t.126.1
l.+E5.1
I.469.0
1,150.6
1.408.9
1,111.9
1,132.9
l.rl2.8
1.t21 .f
l.tt9.5
l.{{9.0
I,{{ t.5
l.16E.9
1.500.2
l.{69.3
l.l{8.1
1.171.5
l,{85.1
l.{89.2
1.476.1
1,5 15..{
1.521 .7
l.l9l.9
l.{6.1.0
1.165.{
l.{13.9
l.lr5.r
l.{95. I
1.15 1.7
191.2
191.2
I9I,2
t9t.l
I9l.l
l9l.t
191.3
l9l.l
191.2
l9l.l
t 9t.{
l9l.l
t9t.3
l9 t.3
191.3
19 r.3
191.3
l9 t.l
l9l.l
191.3
l9l.3
191.3
l9l.3
l9l.3
191.3
191.3
191.3
l9l.l
l9l.4
t9l.{
l9l l
191.3
l9l 3
t 91.3
191.3
191.3
191.3
19 t.3
I91.3
I9 t.3
I91.3
l9l.l
191.3
l9t 2
191.3
Methrne - Oiltl€r Ethane - Outlel - Ourlet CO - Outl€t NOr - Outlet VOC - Ontl€l
38 of87
anlffirpe
lrLrfl,\\i4Lal,1t)l--
Method 1 Data
Imtion Ccotnl
Sourcc Jobxher ,A
Pmid No. AST-2023-{3ol
D^b l2ll1l23
Dud Oridhtioo: Vedcal
Dud Design: Cimlar
IrirhNe fmm F& Wdl to Outside of Pod: 26.00 in
Nipple kngth: 6.m ir
Depthoflrusr 20.m h
Cmlr SdioMl Arcr of Dud,____f_.!!_ft,
No. of Td Pod: 2
NumberofR..dingsperPoirt: I
Di*.reA l.l i
Dinre A ltuct Dierm., ----i-- 1*rr b" ' o.51,,** ,, ----ll-r
Dinre I Dud [lemr6, -----I- 1*rr b" ' 2.y
l6
Actud NumbcrofTnvcM Poitrt!: h
Mesurcr Onitial md D.te): DBR
Revi{Ye. (Inilid md Dd€} RBB
CIRCULAR DUCT
Nurtet of taw* piab on o.limtu
I
3
{
5
6
7
8
9
l0
ll
l,
2 3 a 5 6 T 9 to tl t7
I{.6-6.7-t.4-3.2
85.1-25.0-l{.6-10.5
75.0-29.6-19.J
9J.6 - t0.6
89.5
_ : '-u-'
- 2.6
- 8.2
- 14.6
- 21.6
* 34.2
- 65.8
__ 71.1
- 85.r
- 91.8
- 91.1
2.t
6.1
lI.8
t1.7
25.0
35.6
fl.1
75.O
82.3
88.2
93.1
91.9
*Perceilofstuck didneterlron inside wail to iNerce point
Trrrmc
Point
./o oI
Dimtq
Distme
fmm blide
wrl
fmm
outlidc oI
I
,
I
5
6
1
8
9
l0
tt
12
3.2
10.5
l9.t
32.3
61.1
80.6
E9.5
%.8
0.61
2.10
3,EE
6.S
t3.54
t6.12
l7.s
,r_ra
6.6{
8.10
9.t8
t2.x
19.54
22.t2
23.S,,:,
Suck Diagpm
A= 1.1ft.
B=4.lft.
Depth of Duct = 20 in.
Cmss SctioMl M
aaaaaaaa
Distudanc.
HAliarrce'l-frfii-*N'(:&1" fir]{]{;}Cyclonic Flow Check
Location Central Valley Water Reclamation (C!TV'R)
Source Jenbacher#4
Project No. AST-2023-4301
Date l2ll4l23
Sample Point Angle (AP:O)
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
l0
ll
t2
l3
t4
15
l6
Averase
t2
l5
7
J
3
0
0
10
5
6
9
4
5
5
l0
l2
6.6
40 of 87
)
ffiAtiarrce
I I l: fl f'] : l;.& l-, ri ,"{ l} * q
Field Data
Method 2Data
Locetion Centml Vallev Water Reclamation (CYWR)
Source Jenbacher #4
Project No. AST-2023-4301
I
12il4/23
VALID
I l:30
I l:40
Pass
,
tz^4t23
VALID
l3:06
13:ll
Pass
3
tzn4t23
VALID
l4:20
l4:26
Pass
I
a
3
4
5
6
7
8
I
,
3
4
5
6
7
8
0.87
0.82
0.92
1.30
1.20
1.20
0.95
0.88
l.00
l.l0
1.10
1. l0
0.95
0.88
0.86
0.79
361
361
362
363
363
363
363
362
362
363
363
363
363
364
363
363
1.00
0.99
1.00
l.l0
1.20
1.20
1.00
1.00
0.98
1.00
l. l0
Ll0
1.00
0.95
0.90
0.88
360
360
361
361
362
362
362
362
362
362
363
363
364
364
364
364
0.90
0.92
1.00
1. l0
L00
l. l0
0.99
0.96
0.90
t. t0
l.l0
1.20
L00
L00
0.90
0.92
359
360
360
361
362
362
363
363
361
363
363
364
365
36s
365
365
l.0l I
1.03
0.840
25.80
1.10
25.88
362.4
822.1
0. l0l
1.000
0.101
tt.2s
6.62
29.51
28.35
76.9
10,065
335,285
5,588
1.002
l.0l
0.840
2s.80
1. l0
25.88
362.6
822.2
0.104
1.000
0.t04
I 1.20
6.49
29.49
28.29
76.2
9,979
332,387
5,540
4.964
l.003
L0l
0 840
25.80
1.07
25.88
362.5
822.2
0.103
1.000
0.103
tt_2
6.5
29.49
28.31
76.3
I qRS
332,569
5,543
4,970
Square Root of AP, (in. WC)t/'? (AP)t"
Average AP, in. WC (AP)
Pitot Tube Coeffici€nt (Cp)
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (Pb)
Static Pressure, in. WC (Pg)
Stack Pressure, in. Hg (Ps)
Average Temp€rature, oF Gs)
Average Temperature, oR (Ts)
MeasuredMoistureFraction (BWSmsd)
Moisture Frsction @ Saturation (BWSsat)
Moisture Fraction (BWS)
02 Concentration, To (O2)
CO2Concentration,7o (COz)
rcular Weight, lb/lb-mole (dry) (Md)
rular Weight, lb/lb-mote (wet) (Ms)
Velocity, fUsec (Vs)
VFR at stack conditions, acfm (Qa)
VFR at standard conditions, sclh (Qsw)
VFRatstandardconditions,scfm (Qsw)
rt standard conditions. dscfm
0.995
1.00
0.840
25.80
1.00
25.87
362.6
822.3
0 105
1.000
0 105
11.21
6.s0
29.49
28.28
75.7
9,9t2
330,037
5,501
4l of 87
Di\/iSlON OF AIR QIJALITY
42 of87
Almrrce'T**".1 &, c.4t {!ifi{}up
QA Data
Location Central Valley Water Reclamation (CVWR)
Source Jenbacher #2
Project No. AST-2023-4301
Parameter O, - Outlet CO, - Outlet
Make
Model
S/N
Ooeratins Ranse
Servomex
1400
t420c-2
0-25
Servomex
1400
l4l5c-6
o-25
Cylinder ID
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
NA
cc764364
cc764364
NA
NA
cc764364
cc764364
Cylinder Certifed Values
7*ro
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
NA
23.98
23.98
NA
NA
23.9
23.9
Cylinder Expiration Date
7*ro
Low
Mid
HiPh
NA
NA
9n9/3t
9fi9/31
NA
NA
9n9t3t
9l19t3r
fvne of Sample Line Heated Sample Line
43 of87
ffiqAliatrcEr
1{.! ,\ a z\l- ,..|-.i:t.-Calibration Data
Location: Central Valley Water Reclamation (CVWR)
Source: Jenbacher #2
Project No.: AST-2023-4301
Date: l2ll5l23
Parameter Oz - Outlet COz - Outlet
Exoected Averape Concentration 10.00 8.00
Span Between
Low
High
Desired Snan
10.00
50.00
23.98
8.00
40.00
23.90
Low Range Gas
Low
Hish
NA
NA
NA
NA
Mid Range Gas
Low
Hiph
9.59
t4.39
9.56
14.34
High Range Gas
Low
Hiqh
NA
NA
NA
NA
Actual Concentration (% or ppm)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
0.00
NA
12.00
23.98
0.00
NA
12.00
23.90
Upscale Calibration Gas (Cya)Mid Mid
Instrument Response (% or ppm)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hiqh
0.06
NA
11.97
23.97
-0.04
NA
I 1.87
23.81
Performance (%o of Span or Cal. Gas Conc.)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hiph
0.25
NA
0.13
0.04
0.17
NA
0.54
0.38
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
Alla].lee
TXiltlNlilet {:}fi{}il8
Bias/Drift Determinations
Location: Central Valley Water Reclamation (CVWR)
Source: Jenbacher #2
Project No.: A,ST :2023 -430 I
Parameter Oz - Outlet COz - Outlet
Run I Date 12/15123
Span Value
Initial Instrument Zero Cal Response
Initial Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem l]oscale Resnonse
23.98
0.06
11.97
-0.01
0.08
I1.83
I1.88
23.90
-0.04
I t.87
0.02
-0.02
I t.79
11.68
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Snan
-0.29
0.08
-0.58
-0.39
0.25
0.08
-0.33
-0.79
Drift (%)
Zero
Mid
0.38
0.20
-0. 17
-0.46
Run 2 Date 12115123
Span Value
Instrument Zero Cal Response
Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem Ilnscale Resnonse
23.98
0.06
rr.97
0.08
0.01
I1.88
ll.8l
23.90
-0.04
I 1.87
-0.02
0.03
11.68
11.71
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
hetest Span
Posttest Soan
0.08
-0.22
-0.39
-0.65
0.08
0.31
-0.79
-0.67
Drift (%)
Zero
Mid
-0.30
-0.27
0.23
0.12
Run 3 Date l2llsl23
Span Value
Instrument Zero Cal Response
Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest System Upscale Response
23.98
0.06
lt.97
0.0 r
0.00
I 1.81
1 1.80
23.90
-0.04
I 1.87
0.03
0.00
tt.7 t
I 1.70
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Snan
-0.22
-0.25
-0.65
-0.72
0.31
0. l6
-0.67
-0.7 |
Drift(%)
Zerc
Mid
-0.03
-0 07
-0. l5
-0.04
45 of87
?ECHNICAL {:M$UP
Location: Central Valley Water Reclamation (CVWR)
Source: Jenbacher #2
Project No.: AST-2023-4301
Date: 12/15/2024
Traverse Point Time o2
(o/^l
Cot
(o/ol
A-l
2
3
9:10
9:l I
9:12
tr.2a
tt.23
11.24
tt.2
6.62
6.60
6.60
6.6Averase
Criteria Met Sinsle Point Sinele Point
46 of87
t}'.1AIiatrceTrfic$1rAL Gfi*ll 5
QA Data
Location Central Vallev Water Reclamation (CVWR)
Source Jenbacher #2
Project No. AST-2023-4301
Parameter(s) VFR
Date Pitot ID Evidence of
demase?
Evidence of
mis-alipnment?
Calibration or
Renair reauired?
12t14t23 703-2 no no no
Date Probe or
Thermocouple ID
Reference
Temp. (oF)
Indicated
Temp. (oF)Difference Criteria
t2/14n3 703-2 48.0 48.0 0.OY.+ 1.5 % (absolute)
Date Barometric Evidence of Reading
w^,ifia,l
Calibration or
D6h6ir ra^-irart,Weather Station Location
t2/14/21 Weather Station NA NA NA Salt Lake City, UT
47 of 87
Response Times
YX*r"rrur*AL (jFTOUP
Location: Central Valley Water Reclamation (CVWR)
Source: Jenbacher#2
Project No.: AST-2023-4301
l
Ll
seconds
Parameter Oz - 0utlet COz - Outlet
Zero
Low
Mid
Average
20
NA
20
20
NA
20
20.0 20.0
48 of87
Alffirrce
T E c H N.c n L fi fi * *
?o.",,on central valleywaterReclamation(cvwR)
QA Data
Source Jenbacher #4
Project No. AST-2023-4301
Parameter Or - Outlet COz - Outlet
Make
Model
S/N
Onercfino Rrnoe
Servomex
1400
1420c-2
0-25
Servomex
1400
l4t 5c-6
0-25
Cylinder ID
7*ro
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
NA
cc764364
cc764364
NA
NA
cc764364
cc764364
Cylinder Certifed Values
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
NA
23.98
23.98
NA
NA
23.9
23.9
Cylinder Expiration Date
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
NA
9/t9t3t
9/19t31
NA
NA
9n9t3l
9n9t3t
Ivpe of Sample Line Heated Sample Line
49 of87
AIffirrce
T X{; r'i t,{ I il AL {: f1{}l.i tr Calibration Data
Location: Central Valley Water Reclamation (CVWR)
Source: Jenbacher #4
Project No.: AST-2023-430 I
Date: 12/14/23
Parameter O, - Outlet COz - Outlet
xpected Average Concentration 10.00 10.00
lpan Between
Low
High
Desired Span
10.00
50.00
23.98
10.00
50.00
23.90
Low Range Gas
Low
Hieh
NA
NA
NA
NA
Mid Range Gas
Low
Hish
9.59
14.39
9.56
14.34
fligh Range Gas
Low
Hish
NA
NA
NA
NA
{ctual Concentration (% or ppm)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
0.00
NA
12.00
23.98
0.00
NA
11.96
23.90
Upscale Calibration Gas (Cur)Mid Mid
nstrument Response (% or ppm)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
0.01
NA
I 1.86
23.77
0.07
NA
I1.96
23.78
Performance (7o of Span or Cal. Gas Conc.)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
0.04
NA
0.58
0.88
0.29
NA
0.00
0.50
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
50 of87
#Alhlrce?*sri{!*,qt. i}fi(}u*
Bias/Drift Determinations
Location: Central Valley Water Reclamation (CVWR)
Source: Jenbacher #4
Project No.: 4$Lzl2l 4qt
Parameter O: - Outlet COz - Outlet
Run 1 Date l2ll4l23
Span Value
Initial lnstrument Zero Cal Response
Initial lnstrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem IJoscale Resoonse
23.98
0.01
I1.86
0.00
0.00
12.00
12.00
23.90
0.07
11.96
0.00
0.00
12.00
12.00
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Span
-0.04
-0.04
0.58
0.58
-0.29
-0.29
0.17
017
Drift(%)
Zero
Mid
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Run 2 Date 12/14/23
Span Value
Instrument Zero Cal Response
Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest System Upscale ResDonse
23.98
0.01
I1.86
0.08
0.00
l1.86
12.00
23.90
0.07
I 1.96
0.08
0.00
tt.72
r2.00
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Postlest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Soan
0.29
-0.04
0.00
0.58
0.04
-0.29
- 1.00
0.17
Drift(%)
Zero
Mid
-0.33
0.58
-0.33
t.l7
Run 3 Date l2ll4l23
Span Value
Instrument Zero Cal Response
Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posftest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem IJnscale Resnonse
23.98
0.01
l 1.86
-0.10
0.00
I l.s9
12.00
23.90
0.07
1 1.96
0.03
0.00
1 1.66
12.00
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Soan
-0.46
-0.04
-1.13
0.58
-0.r7
-0.29
-1.26
0.17
Drift(%)
Zero
Mid
0.42
t.7l
-0.13
1.42
5l of87
dAlArEe
T&$!".ll\ltili\'* $fiQUp
Location: Central Valley Water Reclamation (CVWR)
Source: Jenbacher #4
Project No.: AST-2023-4301
Datet 1211412024
Traverse Point Time o2
(%l
Coz
(o/"1
A-l
2
3
l0:50
l0:51
l0:52
n.66
I 1.65
I1.66
tl.7
6.35
6.35
6.35
6.4Averase
Criteria Met Slngle Polnt Sinele Point
52 of87
NAIElrce
THC]ilt"Jt(}AL {ififil,l;:
QA Data
Location Central Vallev Water Reclamation (CVWR)
Source Jenbacher #4
Project No. AST-2023-4301
Parameter(s) VFR
Date Pitot ID Evidence of f,vidence of
mic-qlionmanfj
Calibration or
Flanoir ranrrircd')
t2/14/23 703-2 no no no
Date Probe or
Thermocouple ID
Reference
Temp. (oF)
Indicated
Temp. (oF)Difference Criteria
t2lt4/21 703-2 48.0 48.0 0.0%+ 1.5 % (absolute)
Date Barometric Evidence of Reading
Wa.ifiarl
Calibration or
Ponoir ron-iadt Weflther Station Location
t2t14t23 Weather Station NA NA NA Salt Lake City, UT
53 of87
Response Times
tr*sr,rNtcAL cRor.,P
Location: Central Valley Water Reclamation (CVWR)
Source: Jenbacher#4
Project No.: AST-2023-4301
i
)
I
l'
i
seconds
Parameter Or - Outlet COr - Outlet
Zero
Low
Mid
Averago
25
NA
25
25
NA
25
25.0 25.0
&-,*rilf*Accreditation 1162T54
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71107
800-551 -8150
PGVP Vendor lD # Gl2023
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:
Product lD Number:
Cylinder Pressure:
coA #
Customer PO. NO.:
Customer:
1c764364
1?79O7
1900 PStG
-U /b4Jb4.ZUZJU6JU-U
Certification Date:
Expiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Certif ication Oates:
)912112023
t9t1912031
snreveoon - t A
)c764364.20230830
o8E1 1 EgE
has been per raceability Protocol, Document EPA-600/R-1 2/531,
u
SMART-CERT
Uncertainty Analytical Principle Assayed On
Reference Standard(s)
cc737012 20230228
E80022021.20180323
1162980025 09t13t2023
017146467 09t21r2023
This is to certify the gases referen@d have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the deflned specilications. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National lnstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lntemational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded unertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% @nfidence level of the measurement, unless otherwise noted. This €libration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Techni€l Gas Seruices. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
./^'
Li -
,/zr4 (Ynz
Timothy Davis
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
VeEion 02-J. Revised on 2018-09-17
55 of87
k*j{S-.*
Accredltation #627&{
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Graig Kennedy Way
Shreveporg LA 71107
800-5514150
PGVP Vendor lD f G12021
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:
Product lD Numben
Cylinder Pressure:
coA#
Customer PO. NO.:
Customer:
E80072318
125J71
1900 PSIG
E80072318.20210623-0
Certification Date:
Expiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Certifi cation Dates:
)7t15D021
7t13nO29
snlcvcmr - I a
i8007231 6.2021 0623
)8/-214i74
$andard b€en per the 2 EPA Traceability Protocol, Docriment EPA400/R-12531,
Gl.
SMART.CERT
Concentradon Uncertalnty
10.05 %
10"09 %
AnaMical Principle
NDIR
MPA
AssayEd On
arbon Dioxide 10.75 a7t15no21
07t01t2021{0.s5 %
Balance
Analytical Measuremer* Data Available Online.
EB0046512 E80045512.20190408 12iO3DO27 GMIS M 02 9.31 % 0.2il 2659a
- eeqo:pgzz.--'Eg@280l?201sOso4 Oml1c2n GMls N2 02 24't- ---q.497--*jzfqgl*-E80087520 e40087s2020191Q5 03rcar20ag GM|S N2 COz 9.48 % 0.331 C1847810.09
Analytical lnstrumentation
o2
co2
MPA
NDIR
Make
Them
Th€ru
Model
410i
410
11629E0025 0680J'20?1
1162980@5 6t22DO21
This is to ettiry the gas$ Eferenced have been calibratedlEsted, and verified to meet he defined specifications. This
calibratton'testwas performed using Gases or Scales fiat are Gceable through National hstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lntemAional System of Units (Sl). The basig ot complianc€ stated is a comparison of the
measuremert parameers to fie specfied or required calibratiorvtesting process. The expanded uncertaintes use a coverage
f,actor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confidence level of the mEasuGment, unless otheMise noted. Th'ls calibration certificaie
applies only to he hem described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written appoval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Services. lf not included, the uncertsinty ofcalibrations arc available upon request and were taken into ac€ount
$.hen determining pass or fail.
4y'
Anthony Cyr
Assistant Operations Manager
Assay t"ahraiorlr Red BallTGS
V€rsim eJ, Revired qn 201S0917
56 of87
-.1: ,?"
*ffi*'rl.'.-.,\.s
&
d&"H*ll*h
Accreditation #62754
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71107
800-551 -8150
PGVP Vendor lD # Gl 2023
CERTIFIED GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:
Product lD Number:
Cylinder Pressure:
coA #
Customer PO. NO.:
Customer:
:80038762
125303
g{JO PSIG
:5UUS /OZ.ZUZJUJUO-U
Certification Date:
Expiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Certification Dates:
)3t15t2tJ23
t3t14t?o?5
- Shreveoort - LA
:ts003U /62.202303Ub
)65'156566
SMART-CERTAnalytical tnstrumentation
SF6 flIR MKS MKS 2O31DJG2EKVS13T 017146467
C2H4O FTIR MKS MKS 2O31OJG2EKVS13T 017146467
This mixture is certified in Mole % to be within t2% of the actual n
manufactured bv scale: weiohts traceable to N.l.S.T. Cerlilicete #82426692642.
12olo NIST
! 2% NIST
9.97 PPt\i
98 1 PPM
4011772
4011772
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifictions. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are tEeable through National lnstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lntemational System of Units (Sl). The basis ofcompliance stated is a comparison ofthe
measurement parameters to the specifled or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a
@verage factor of k=2 to apprcximate the 95% confidence level of the measuremenl, unless otheMise noted. This
calibration certificate applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval
from Red Ball Technical Gas Seruies. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were
taken into account when delermining pass or fail.
A.y/
Anthony Cyr
Assistant Operations Manager
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Ve.sion 02-G. Revised on 2O17-07-O2
57 of 87
^&-'*f{*S**oAccreditation #62754
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71107
800-551 -8150
PGVP Vendor lD # Gl 2023
CERTIFIED GAS GERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:
Product lD Number:
Cylinder Pressure:
coA#
Customer PO. NO.:
C u stome r:
:80073902
24434
1900 PStG
:B0U /39U2 2|J23|J 13|J-l)
Certification Date:
Expiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Certification Dates:
)tslo I tzo23
)8t06t2025
JIIIEVEUUIT - LA
ItsOOl3902.20230730
084266022
SMART-CERT
This mixture is for laboratoru use onlv- not for druo- household or olher use
This maxture is certified in Mole % to be within t2% of the actual number reported with a confidence of 95%.
This mixture was manufactured bv scale: weiohts traceable to N.|.S.T. Certificate*8221266926{2.
Do Not use This Cvlinder Below 100 osid a0 7 Meoaoascrll
Analytical lnstrumentation
Make
I,IKS MKS 2O31DJG2EKVSI3T 017146467
Reference Standard(s)
cc722751 07t28t2024 PS N2 c2H4 102 PPM 2 4034426
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifications. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are tEeable through National lnstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lntemational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a @mparison of the
measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a
coverage factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confldence level of the measurement, unless otherwise noted. This
calibration cerliflcate applies only to the item described and shall not be reproducd other than in full, without written approval
from Red Ball Technical Gas Services. lf not included, the uncerlainty of calibrations are available upon request and were
taken into account when determining pass or fail.
,/arrun W"h-
Aaron Varelas
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Vereion 02-G Revised on 2017-07-02
58 of87
Central Valley Water Reclamation (CVWR)
Source(s) Jenbacher #2and#4
Project No. AST-2023-4301
Health Check Parameter Single Beam (Pre-Test)
Instrument ID MKS 7 (Serial #01451609)
t2n4t2023
rtl vista rHasoftrvarc V10,7
Fac Mdh Tmls Help
0
0
ol
o
ll I I I I r I I r I I I I I I I I I I tt
450 Em 8m lom t2m l4m t6m 18m 2000 un 24gJ 26m 29tr ilm 32m 3400 3500 3800 {gut 4200 45m
Dd6 l2,r3l.rt$g Tire' 5:00:01 pt*t
59 of 87
Location
Source(s)
Project No.
Health Check Parameter
Instrument ID
Date
Central Valley Water Reclamation (CVWR)
Jenbacher #2 and#4
AST-2023-4301
Single Beam (Post-Test)
MKS 7 (Serial #01451609)
t2/15t2023
FI vict" FI-tn soft.uc V10.7
Flc M.th Tmls Holp
ttltttltlrtttrtttt8m lom 1200 rlrE 1500 tmo 2un m un 2600 280t1 30m 3200 3400 3600 3800 {m0 1a0
kjifEdiffi i r,i,,"dir tir'Tffi 1
sulT-l ufr-l -ii_s---
E|,IGINE2_05008KG.II4E I Dat€t 12131flS ! Tlrc: em,glE(
J*lamo
60 of87
Location
Source(s)
Project No.
Instrument ID
Date
Jenbacher #2 and#4
Central Valley Water Reclamation (CVWR)
AST-2023-4301
Health Check Parameter Detector Linearity
MKS 7 (Serial #01451609)
12fi4/2023
Il oLT lnltrument Monrtot
N.w Bc{d.e (Fl) Cle* Ch..t} (F3) P*e 9ea (F}
iSiiri;-6e'-'l
cxa El " - "' ---0sHi----nlt
lemtll*P[-
FFtP*pl <F5) S@ g@b* aF7> fl.tun (Fg,
rlIIr'l
Cnlb FT.IF
cuG{I,**
.y,&&
Fd D..r/T@ ll/,ar&, Ot 181? &"-. Immra ':O:f.fO -!J
6l of87
Location
Source(s)
Project No.
Health Check
Instrument ID
Date
Jenbacher #2 and#4
Central Valley Water Reclamation (CVWR)
AST-2023-430r
Parameter PeakAnalysis
MKS 7 (Serial #01451609)
t2/1412023
E',r","""o",**;;
f r,-ff] Dera'r'e,Lod Fef Cor*b FTIB {tr2} Pr}{ Ftrd (fG)ftetun (FB)
r' trr trr' r.r | ' r ' i tr ' ! rt r I r',, rr r, rt r r rr.!,,,lt.,! r,,.,t, r
0.000
0 &55
0,60
0.045
9.040
0.m$
0.030
0 025
0.020
0,015
B-OIO
0,m5
0,00s
€.m5
.B,OTO
3119.0 3-Laitii niEa-nisulii"
1.078
..--*l_19
L JI "ilF"Jl il orbi al*rtoq
il n*acur*tlaralrc
:lAdo Coaected La*r Frcq
ri C:lctl*{ed Losa Freq
3321 0
SAMPLE PEAK EESULTS
I FWHH tm.Il 0.4957
Freq[cm'll S&.tts84
peakldUl A.OSfl
baeiina SlJl 0.{655ii uaqfiE|.a, !.w??
,ialeruada hul 8,S16
mea*uedS
rcfar*n*o f
HETEEE}ICE PEAK RESULIS
R$HH {!r1l , 0.4647
Frcq [cm1] 3SX].852
F.*lAUl 0.2tlll
b.$€&E (AUl 0.m24
rrp|iaudc!{lrl 01380
15?S 3,15-I
3t128.05{6
157S 3853
1s?S.ill25
5e( Lam Fr*q to Calcdated
62 of 87
Location
Source(s)
Project No.
Health Check Parameter
Instrument ID
Date
Central Valley Water Reclamation (CVWR)
Jenbacher #2 and#4
AST-2023-4301
Signal to Noise Ratio
MKS 7 (Serial #01451609)
t211412023
Ifl uts otr signaFto-Noise Analyzer
$NR 5*w Bm SNB Tea Savr Rcpoil Cor{is FTIR {F2)
uno 1m.0 12m.0 11{10.0 rffi.0 1s00.0 2m.0
I
1.m10
xs l"g1ffi etl
Ilv _girx t
Print Fanal <F6>
o
Rettrn (F8>
'*..
Fxs 3
ll*ls,$ * t mt t m cm-l. Rils l.lcise{) .WW4 t0.2nxn$ $lAljl $NH,l SB
I fi mc6' 21 m2m cm-l. BMS Xdrc.0.ffi345Z {0 2{t}S{ rrAul 5]1fi "1 807
f*{FrUc. tm-11**r.r.
Pilgc - Zl(D?an cflIl,
1latac.2SI}3tr0 cm'i.
tiPss g
tlR*rca.10S11&cm-'|.
l:Baga . 2196-2o$'t "*., ,
.fimqE . 2gDilm c'r.1.
ll
i]t'{unBa*s
lRaroe . I fiIll l ffi cnrl . HMS tlriec'{}. (f,-l 225U l02$tr}2 mAUl.
. fi ape . Zl fi)2Ztr crn.l. R MS l,lcisa{. ffi:}3182 ({1231 691 rAU}.
: Eancc . 2gDXm em-1. 8MS Hdss{I t 1 n 2k P.Stl8658 rlAu}.
RMS X.*!*4l.lffi(EBB tU.t8zffi B*U[ 5XF-1538
RMS Ndt"{1.tr2t11ft {0.2263ffi mAU[ S]lR-1319
HMS Nnisr-.{l,llilffiX t0.1S6043 rAUf Sllft --876
RtilS Hdt€=0.S'itSA (0.251 872 mAul
ft MS NcitI{1{H5{P{Z 10.?38:51} tlAUI
RMS Ncis.4,l I 36€'/Z t0.{SS8:} rALJl
SHB=II24
5Nfi=1RI7
5NR4}
Sl,lH-1$tG
SNB.l876
sNH.€58
63 of87
Location
Source(s)
Project No.
Health Check Parameter
Instrument ID
Date
Central Valley Water Reclamation (CVWR)
Jenbacher #2 andl4
AST-2023-4301
Analysis Validation Utility
MKS 7 (Serial #01451609)
12n4t2023
Analysis Validation Report
Sample Filename: C:\2023\23-a301 CVWR\E NG I N E 4_0465. LAB
Filena me for noise: C:\2023\23-4301 CVWR\ENG I N E 4_0035. LAB
lnterferences Filenames: C:\OLT\Analysis Validation Utility\Support spectra\1min 191C LN2\lnterferents H20 10pct C
Reci pe path : C:\OLT\Recipes\NG Engines R3. MGRCP
Gas calibration Name Conc
ACETALDEHYDE 5.110 PPM 3.L2
sF6191C(2) -0.46
NO (350,3000) 191C 10.s1
NO2 (1s0) 191C (1OF2) 3s.0s
NO2 (2000) 191C (2OF2) t6.7s
cH4 (2s0) 191C (1OF2) 933.47
cH4 (3000) 191C (2OF2) L473.99
N2O FULL CAL 191C -5,27
NH3 (300) 1e1C (1OF2) -0.1s
NH3 (3000) 1s1C (2OF2) 1.63
H2O%(2O)I9LC L0.22
coz% (2o) L91C s.99
co (s00) 191c (1oF2) 42L.82
COo/. (Ll 191C (2OF2) 0.04
ETHANE (500) 191C 25.06
ETHYLENE (100,3000) 191C 15.01
ACETYLENE (1000) 191C 2.s2
PROPANE (200) 191C 6.04
PROPYLENE (200,1000) 1911 0.05
BUTANE (200) 191C O.L7
FORMALDEHYDE (AST 4-41) 46.OL
1 MAU FMU*R OCU - DL
2.64 3.13 L5.97 ts.97 0.76
0.01 0.01 0.13 0.13 0.L7
0.99 1.35 24.53 2453 0.87
0.16 0.L7 3.38 3.38 0.15
4.36 5.56 74.67 74.67 0.79
1.32 3.5 723.47 723.47 0.L4
2.76 4.55 234.49 234.49 L.28
10.25 L5.7 45.2 4s.2 L.23
o.27 0.46 7.5t 7.5L 0.18
2.99 5.63 44.18 44.L8 1.33
0.03 0.05 2.47 2.47 -
0.04 0.05 2.16 2.L6 -
0.64 1.39 L79.4 779.4 0.2
0 0 0.04 0.04 0
1.01 L.t2 L3.28 73.28 0.22
o.37 0.65 10.6 10.6 0-57
2.99 4.O1 34.5 34.5 0.33
0.55 0.59 6.57 6.57 0.33
o.97 7.14 15.59 16.59 0.51
0.48 0.57 6.2 6.2 0.29
1.51 1.89 8.09 8.09 0.19
MDC3
13
0.1
L7.97
3.2t
58.61
310.15
158.87
29.s
4.44
23.42
1.24
1.55
91.51
0.02
25.7
5.
L4.L
5.2
MDC2
0.5
0.02
0.1
0.06
o.64
0.04
0.49
0.28
0.04
0.82
64 of 87
Location
Source(s)
Project No.
Spectra (CTS)
Date
Time
Jenbacher #2 and#4
Central Valley Water Reclamation (CVWR)
AST-20234301
ENGINE 4 OO4O.LAB
12n4t2023
8:41:29 AM
E Vitta rr-tn sort'r.rr Yt0.T
Fb Hrlh Tods Hcb
tlttltttttttttIm 12m rrm 16m 1m0 am w il{tr 2600 2str flm mm 3{(n*m
srorl-Tl .rf-i*l {ffi$$
Location
Source(s)
Project No.
Spectra (Native)
Date
Time
Jenbacher #2 and#4
Central Valley Water Reclamation (CVWR)
AST-2023-430r
ENGINE 4 O463.LAB
t2/14/2023
2:54:l2PM
jiX vista Fr-tRsoftware vl0.7
Fila Math Tods Help
7.500
7.m0
6.
5.000-
5.
't.500
4.m0
3.500
3.m0
2.500
1.
1.(I)0
0.500
ffiir;a;619-mmE;ol
66 of87
Location
Source(s)
Project No.
Spectra (Spike)
Date
Time
Jenbacher #2 and#4
Central Valley Water Reclamation (CVWR)
AST-2023-4301
ENGINE 4 O474,LAB
1211412023
3:05:12 PM
I.iI vitt" FT-IR soft rare
Fle Math Took Help
8.m
7.5m
7.m
6.5m
6.m
5.5m
5.m
4.5{10
4.m0
3.500
3.m
2.500
2.m0
L
ttr12m 1400 1600
tr:i i trz'ImEml
slotft I ot:l I,r< ,ll,Meml
IENGINE jl_047'l.tAB
67 of87
latrcc!AI
amrilVellru wailr Recli'miiinn 1a\rwR I[6cdiion:
Source:
Project No.:
Date
vlethod Criteria EPA
'xram€02
Makr
Mode
s/l
Spar
Seruomex
t400
1420c-2
rID
Lero
Mid
qioh
NA
8800723 r 8
cc764364
Certified Values
Zeto
Mid
gioh
0.0
t0 95
23.98
nstrument Resoonse (9/o or Dom)
Zero
Mid
0.01
10.91
23 97
lrlibretion (;es Selection (o oISDan)
t{id
Hish
45 I
100.0
lolibrstion Error Performance o% ofSpan)
Zero
Mid
g:-L
0.0
4.2
(7" ofRrnoel
Analyzer Make
Analyzer Model
Analyzer SN
Environics ID
Component/Balmce Gc
Cylinder C6 ID (Dilution)
02N2
cc764364
Cylinder Go Concentration (Dilution), %: 23.98
Cylindq Gc ID (Mid-Level): E80072318
Cylindo Go Concentration (Mid-Lcvel), %
units the 90% @ Tlpm md 80% @ Tlpm injections will not be conducted
AVerage
Analyzer
Conc6tration
Injection 1
Eror
I + 2./.\
Injection 2
Error
I * 2./.\
Injection 3
Error
l*2o/.\
I9 29 -o 20/^o 20/.o oo/r
209 o oo/.o o./.-o I o/n
4 I Oo/o 4 60/o 4 4"/t
239 o.oyo oo%o.ovo
Mid-Level Suoolv Gas Calibration Direct to An
Calibration
Gas
Conceotration
lnjection I
Analyzer
Conccntration
lnjection 2
Analyzer
Concentration
Injection 3
Analyzer
Conceotration
Average
Aoalyztr
Conccntration Difference
Average
Efior
(r2%l
0.9)10.99 t.00 I .00 t.00 0.05 0.4Yo
68 of87
AIILrrce
STfI,J[:1()F TESTING
Mass Flow Controller Calibration
Note: The mass flow controller's calibration values are used by the dilution system's operating software to improve accuracy. These calibrations are not
necessarily indicative of the systems overall performance. Performance is verified by conducting a Method 205 prior to each field use.
Calibration Performed By Ryan Lyons
Dilution System Make:
Dilution System Model:
Dilution System S/N:
Calibration Equipment Make:
Glibration Equipment Model:
Calibration Equipment S/N:
Flow Cell S/N:
Flow Cell S/N:
callbratlon Gas:
Barometric Pressure, mmHg:
Ambient Temperature,'F:
4040
Scientific
1O5LPD/5MM.D/5M, M-15LPM.D/5I
L97205; 197208
L97208
t97206
25.6
72
Mass Flow controller lD
Size, ccm:
Make:
Model:
S/N:
fiL
10,000
Environics
4040
455242003
*2
10,000
Environics
4040
45524?OO4
fi3
1,000
Environics
4040
4ss242002
Set Flow True Flow Difference
cclmin cclmin
Set Flow True Flow Difference
cclmin cclmin
set Flow True Flow Difference
cclmin cc/min
5%
LO%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
500 502 0.4%
1,000 1,015 t.5%
2,000 2,040 2.0%
3,000 3,060 2.0%
4,000 4,083 2.L%
5,000 5,093 L.9%
5,000 6,110 L.8%
7,000 7,724 t.8%
8,000 8,1s0 t.9%
9,000 9,172 L.9%
10,000 70,2L4 2.L%
500 495 7.0%
1,000 L,ot4 L.4%
2,000 2,037 L.9%
3,000 3,0s7 7.9%
4,000 4,07L r.a%
5,000 5,082 1.6%
5,000 5,100 7.7%
7,000 7,L30 1.9%
8,000 8,150 7.9%
9,000 9,t76 2.0%
10,000 L0,202 2.0%
s0 47 5.8%
100 98 2.4%
200 199 0.3%
300 301 0.4%
400 403 0.6%
500 504 0.7%
600 605 0.9%
700 709 t.2%
800 814 7.7%
900 919 2.2%
1,000 1,028 2.8%
Date 4126123
69 of87
70 of87
NAltatEe
: - .- ,.:
^,
I a'
^
i f,i u /\ ': J
Location Central Valley Water Reclamation (CVWR)
Source Jenbacher #2
Project No. AST-2023-4301
Run Number Run I Run 2 Run 3
Date
Start Time
Stop Time
t2lt5t23
9:24
l0:24
t2lt5l23
l0:39
I l:39
12115123
l2:33
l3:33
Ooerational Data
Engine Exhaust Temperature, oF
Time, 0 min
Time, l5 min
Time, 30 min
Time,45 min
Time, 60 min
Average
982
984
984
986
984
984
984
982
982
984
982
983
984
984
981
981
984
983
Generator Output, Hz (Gen OP)
Time, 0 min
Time, l5 min
Time, 30 min
Time,45 min
,,..;rr:ril:
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
Engine Speed, RPM (ES)
Time, 0 min
Time, l5 min
Time, 30 min
Time,45 min
,tr.;4":rTj:
,500
,500
,500
,500
,500
.500
500
500
500
500
500
500
1,500
1,500
1,500
1,500
1,500
I.500
Engine Brake Work, HP (EBW)
Time, 0 min 2,4
Time, 15 min 2,4
Time, 30 min 2,4
Time,45 min 2,4
Time, 60 min 2,4
Averase 2-4
5 2,4
5 2,4
5 2,4
5 2,4
5 2,4
5 2.4
5 2,415
5 2,415
5 2,415
5 2,415
5 2,415
5 2-415
Fuel Rate, scft (Fo)
Time, 0 min 175
Time, 15 min 175
Time, 30 min 176
Time, 45 min 175
Time, 60 min 174
Averase 175
76
76
77
75
76
76
77
77
78
77
77
77
71 of87
trAIAIEej'&sdnircAL {*r{(}Llry
Location Central Valley Water Reclamation (CVWR)
Source Jenbacher #4
Project No. AST-2023-4301
Run Number Run I Run 2 Run 3
Date
Start Time
Stoo Time
t2n4123
11:03
12:03
t2lt4l23
12:25
t3'.25
t2/14t23
l4:00
l5:00
Operational Data
Engine Exhaust Temperature, "F
Time, 0 min
Time, l5 min
Time, 30 min
Time,45 min
Time, 60 min
Averase
979
981
981
984
977
980
979
982
988
964
961
975
963
964
966
964
966
96s
3enerator Output, Hz (Gen OP)
Time, 0 min
Time, l5 min
Time, 30 min
Time,45 min
Time, 60 min
Average
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
Engine Speed, RPM (ES)
Time, 0 min
Time, l5 min
Time, 30 min
Time,45 min
Time, 60 min
Average
,500
,500
,500
,500
,500
.500
,500
,500
,500
,500
,500
.500
500
500
500
500
500
500
Engine Brake Work, HP (EBW)
Time, 0 min 2,4
Time, 15 min 2,4
Time, 30 min 2,4
Time,45 min 2,4
Time, 60 min 2,4
Averase 2.4
2 2,414 2,4
4 2,414 2,4
4 2,414 2,4
5 2,414 2,4
5 2,42s 2,4
4 2.416 2.4
5
5
4
5
5
5
Fuel Rate, scft (Fp)
Time, 0 min
Time, l5 min
Time,30 min
Time, 45 min
Time, 60 min
Averase
177
177
t75
l8l
180
178
177
175
t76
177
177
176
185
187
184
185
r86
185
72 of 87
73 of 87
#
rrui
$-t h.t I {*i &
Site Specific Test Plan
Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility
800 W Central Valley Road
Salt Lake ciry, uT 84119-3379
Sources to be Tested: Jenbacher Engine #2 8. Jenbacher
Engine #4
Proposed Test Date: December l4-I5,2023
Project No. AST-2023 -4301
Prepared By
Alliance Technical Group, I.LC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley City, UT 84120
N/qF'
AIi-arpe Site Spectfic Test Plan
Test Progrom Summary
Regulatory Information
Permit Nos.
Regulatory Citation
Source Information
Title V 3500191001 and DAQE-ANl04l400l5-21
40 CFR 60, Subpart JJJJ
Source Name
GE Jenbacher Model JMS 612-
F28F02 Generator Engine
GE Jenbacher Model JMS 612-
F28F02 Generator Engine
Contact Information
Source ID
Jenbacher #2
Jenbacher #4
Target Parameters
NOx, CO, VOC, NMHC
NOx, CO, VOC, NMHC
Test Location
Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility
Wastewater Treatment Plant
800 W Central Valley Road
Salt Lake city, uT 84119-3379
Facility Contact
Bryan Mansell
[e-mail]
[phone]
Test Company
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
5757 Genoa Red Bluff Road
Pasaden4 TX77507
Project Manager
Charles Horton
[e-mail]
(352) 663-7s68
Field Team Leader
Alen Jensen
alan j ensen@all iancetg. com
[phone]
(subject to change)
QA/QC Manager
Kathleen Shonk
katie. [e-mail]
(8t2) 452-4785
Test Plan/Report Coordinator
Betzaida Aponte Hernii'ndez
aponte.hernandez@all iancetg.com
(787\ 231-772s
Central Valley - Satt Lake City, UTAST-2023-4301
75 of87
Page i
dAltarrce Site Spectfic Test Plan
Table ofContents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
l.l Process/Control System Descriptions .......... l-l
2.0 Summar of Test Program......... .......................2-l
2.2 Process/Control System Parameters to be Monitored and Recorded .................... ............2-l
2.3 Proposed Test Schedule ........2-l
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and2 - Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate ..... 3-l
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3.A - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide.......... .......................... 3-l
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 320 - BWS, NOx, CO, VOC, and NMHC.......... .......3-2
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Gas Dilution System Certification... .................3-2
3.5 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A ................. .........................3-2
3.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Method 320................ .......... J-J
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-l: Program Outline and Tentative Test Schedule ...................2-2
Central Valley - Salt Lake City, UTAST-2023-4301
76 of87
Page ii
ff:t-w-:Aliancle Site Specrfic'l'est Plan
lntoduction
1.0 Introduction
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by Central Valley Wastewater Reclamation Facility
(Central Valley) to conduct compliance testing at the Wastewater Treatment Plant in Salt Lake City, Utah. Portions
of the facility are subject to provisions of the 40 CFR 60, Subpart JJJJ and the Utah Department of Environmental
Quality, Division of Air Quality (UDAQ) Title V Permit No. 3500191001 and Approval Order (AO) DAQE-
ANl04l40015-21. Testing will be conducted to determine the emission rates of nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon
monoxide (CO), volatile organic compounds (VOC), and non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHC) from the exhausts of
two (2) GE Jenbacher Model JSM 612-F28F02 engines designated as Jenbacher #2 and Jenbacher #4. The VOC
emissions will not include formaldehyde.
This site-specific test plan (SSTP) has been prepared to address the notification and testing requirements of the
UDAQ permit and the NSPS.
1 l Process/ControlSystemDescriptions
Central Valley operates two (2) GE Jenbacher Model JMS 612-F28F02 generator engines. Each engine rates at
2,509 horsepower (hp). The engines can be fired on natural gas or digester gas. Testing for Jenbacher #2 and
Jenbacher #4 will be conducted while the engines are fired on a mixed gas of blended digester gas and natural gas.
1.2 Project Team
Personnel planned to be involved in this project are identified in the following table.
Table 1-l: Project Team
1.3 Safety Requirements
Testing personnel will undergo site-specific safety training for all applicable areas upon arrival at the site. Alliance
personnel will have current OSHA or MSHA safety training and be equipped with hard hats, safety glasses with side
shietds, steel-toed safety shoes, hearing protection, fire resistant ctothing, and fall protection (including shock
corded lanyards and full-body hamesses). Alliance personnel will conduct themselves in a manner consistent with
Client and Alliance's safety policies.
A Job Safety Analysis (JSA) will be completed daily by the Alliance Field Team Leader.
Central Valley Salt Lake City, UT
Central Valley Personnel Bryan Mansell
Regulatory Agency UDAQ
Alliance Personnel Alen Jensen
other field personnel assigned at time of testing event
AST-2023-4301
77 of87
Page l-l
Site Speci/ic Test Plan
Summary ol Tesl Proprams
2.0 Summary of Test Program
To satisfy the requirements of the UDAQ permit and the NSPS, the facility will conduct a performance test program
to determine the compliance status of two (2) GE Jenbacher Model JSM 612-F28F02 engines designated as
Jenbacher #2 and Jenbacher #4.
2.1 General Description
All testing will be performed in accordance with specifications stipulated in U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 1,2,
3,A' and 320. Table 2-1 presents an outline and tentative schedule for the emissions testing program. The following
is a summary of the test objectives.
Testing will be performed to demonstrate compliance with the UDAQ permit and 40 CFR 60, Subpart JJJJ.
Emissions testing will be conducted on the exhaust of Jenbacher #2 and lenbacher #4.
Performance testing for Jenbacher #2 and Jenbacher #4 will be conducted while the engines are fired on
mixed digester gas and natural gas.
. Performance testing for Jenbacher #2 and Jenbacher #4 will be conducted at no less than 90% of the
production rate achieved to date.
Each of the three (3) test runs will be 60 minutes in duration.
The VOC measurements will not include formaldehyde.
Concurrent oxygen (O2), carbon dioxide (COz) and moisture content (BWS) will be collected during each
test run and combined with facility data to calculate emission rates in grams per break horsepower hour
(g/bhp-hr).
2,2 Process/Control System Parameters to be Monitored and Recorded
Plant personnel will collect operational and parametric data at least once every 15 minutes during the testing. The
following list identifies the measurements, observations and records that will be collected during the testing
program:
Ambient Temperature (oF)
Barometric Pressure ("HgA)
Relative Humidity (%)
Compressor Process Conditions
Engine Operating Load
Fuel Consumption
2.3 Proposed Test Schedule
Tabte 2-l presents an outline and tentative schedule for the emissions testing program.
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
Central Valley - Salt Lake City, UTAST-2023-430 I
78 of 87
Page 2-l
Ms'#r
AIlrurpe
Site Specilic T est Plon
Summury ol l'est l>roprams
Table 2-l: Program Outline and Tentative Test Schedule
Parameter
1i].l1l##ti',t1\t':::::::::::::::::::::::::;:,...
Bi
,. :i::, iitr..r:..r:. :.
-,RriDouriiion Est,0nqite
t lme
DAYI-December13.2023
Equipment Setup & Pretest QA/QC Checks 6hr
DAY2-December14.2023
Jenbacher #2
VFR l-2
J 60 min 10 hr
Ozl COz 3A
BWS
320
NOx
CO
VOC '
NMHC
DAY 3 - December 15.2023
Jenbacher #4
VFR t-2
J 60 min l0 hr
Ozl COz 3A
BWS
320
NOx
CO
VOC '
NMHC
'VOC measurements will not include formaldehyde.
2.4 Emission Limits
Emission limits for each pollutant are below.
Table 2-22 Emission Limits
irilllllliilli;ri$ddiib"riiitlitrltlilii'iriilii tr:r:-irillr,1'.1 :,::rf O llutant ",rr:,,,1:iiillii: !l:i.L,,: ::,:t)Clta tiOnl:,:a.:' a:,:, :t :', : "
: t'.: "' t' :::.::
Jenbacher #2
Jenbacher #4
NOx - 0.55 g/bhp-hr
Permit
CO -2.5 g/bhp-hr
VOC - 1.0 g,rbhp-hr
NMHC - 0.3 g/bhp-hr
Central Valley - Salt Lake City, UTAST-2023-430 I
79 of 87
Page 2-2
Site Specfic Test Plan
Summary of Te sl P rosrams
2.5 Test Report
The final test report must be submitted within 60 days of the completion of the performance test and will include the
following information.
o Introduction - Briefdiscussion ofproject scope ofwork and activities.
c Results and Discussion - A summary of test results and procesVcontrol system operational data with
comparison to regulatory requirements or vendor guarantees along with a description ofprocess conditions
and/or testing deviations that may have affected the testing results.
c Methodology- A description of the sampling and analytical methodologies.
. Sample Calculations - Example calculations for each target parameter.
c Field Data - Copies of actual handwritten or electronic field data sheets.
t Quality Control Data - Copies of all instrument calibration data and/or calibration gas certificates.
o Process Operating/Control System Data - Process operating and control system data (as provided by
Central Valley) to support the test results.
Central Valley - Salt Lake City, UTAST-2023-4301
80 of87
Page 2-3
Allialpe Sire Specilic Test Plan
'lesting Methodology
3.0 Testing Methodology
This section provides a description of the sampling and analytical procedures for each test method that witl be
employed during the test program. Al[ equipment, procedures and quality assurance measures necessary for the
completion of the test program meet or exceed the specifications of each relevant test method. The emission testing
program will be conducted in accordance with the test methods tisted in Table 3- 1 .
Table 3-l: Source Testing Methodology
All stack diameters, depths, widths, upstream and downstream disturbance distances and nipple lengths will be
measured on site with a verification measurement provided by the Field Team Leader.
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and 2 - Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate
The sampling location and number of traverse (sampling) points wilt be selected in accordance with U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method l. To determine the minimum number of traverse points, the upstream and downstream
distances will be equated into equivalent diameters and compared to Figure l-2 in U.S. EPA Reference Test Method
l.
Ful[ velocity traverses will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 to determine the
average stack gas velocity pressure, static pressure and temperature. The velocity and static pressure measurement
system wi[[ consist of a pitot tube and inclined manometer. The stack gas temperature will be measured with a K-
type thermocouple and pyrometer.
Stack gas velocity pressure and temperature readings will be recorded during each test run. The data collected will
be utitized to calculate the volumetric flow rate in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2.
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide
The oxygen (Oz) and carbon dioxide (COz) testing will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test
Method 3.A. Data will be collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system will consist
of a stainless-steel probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system and the identified gas analyzer. The gas
conditioning system will be a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the stack gas. If an unheated
Teflon sample line is used, then a portable non-contact condenser will be placed in the system directly after the
probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon sample line will be used. The quality control measures are described in Section
3.5.
Central Valley Salt Lalie City, UT
Parameter U.S. EPA ReferenceI Test Methods
Volumetric Flow Rate t&2 Full Velocitv Traverses
Oxygen / Carbon Dioxide 3A Instrumental Analysis
Moisture Content / Nitrogen Oxides i Carbon
Monoxide / Volatile Organic Compounds /
Non-Methane Hydrocarbons
320 FTIR - Continuous Sampling
Gas Dilution System Certification 205
AST-2023-430 I
8l ol87
Page 3-l
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 320 - BWS, NOx, CO, VOC, and NMHC
The concentrations of moisture content (BWS), nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), volatile organic
compounds (VOC) and non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHC) will be determined in accordance with U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method 320. Each source gas stream will be extracted at a constant rate through a heated probe,
heated filter and heated sample line and analyzed with a MKS MultiGas 2030 FTIR operated by a portable
computer. The computer has FTIR spectra of calibration gases stored on the hard drive. These single component
calibration spectra are used to analyze the measured sample spectra. The gas components to be measured will be
selected from the spectra library and incorporated into the analytical method. The signal amplitude, linearity, and
signal to noise ratio will be measured and recorded to document analyzer performance. A leak check will be
performed on the sample cell. The instrument path tength will be verified using ethylene as the Calibration Transfer
Standard. Dynamic spiking will be performed using a certified standard of the target compound or appropriate
surrogate in nitrogen with sulfur hexafluoride blended as a tracer to calculate the dilution factor. All test spectr4
interferograms, and analytical method information are recorded and stored with the calculated analytical results. The
quality control measures are described in Section 3.6.
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Gas Dilution System Certification
A calibration gas dilution system field check will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Method
205. Multiple dilution rates and total gas flow rates will be utilized to force the dilution system to perform two
dilutions on each mass flow controller. The diluted calibration gases will be sent directly to the analyzer, and the
analyzer response recorded in an electronic field data sheet. The analyzer response must agree within 2% of the
actual diluted gas concentration. A second Protocol I calibration gas, with a cylinder concentration within l0% of
one ofthe gas divider settings described above, will be introduced directly to the analyzer, and the analyzer response
recorded in an electronic field data sheet. The cylinder concentration and the analyzer response must agree within
2%o. These steps will be repeated three (3) times.
3.5 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A
Cylinder calibration gases will meet EPA Protocol | (+l- 2o/o) standards. Copies of all calibration gas certificates
will be included in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix of the report.
Low Level gas will be introduced directly to the analyzer. After adjusting the analyzer to the Low Level gas
concentration and once the analyzer reading is stable, the analyzer value will be recorded. This process will be
repeated for the High Level gas. For the Calibration Error Test, Low, Mid, and High Level calibration gases will be
sequentially introduced directly to the analyzer. The Calibration Error for each gas must be within 2.0 percent of the
Calibration Span or 0.5olo absolute difference.
High or Mid Level gas (whichever is closer to the stack gas concentration) will be introduced at the probe and the
time required for the analyzer reading to reach 95 percent or 0.5Yo (whichever was less restrictive) of the gas
concentration will be recorded. The analyzer reading will be observed until it reaches a stable value, and this value
will be recorded. Next, Low Level gas will be introduced at the probe and the time required for the analyzer reading
to decrease to a value within 5.0 percent or 0.5o/o (whichever was less restrictive) will be recorded. If the Low Level
gas is zero gas, the acceptable response must be 5.0 percent ofthe upscale gas concentration or 0.57o (whichever
was less restrictive). The analyzer reading will be observed until it reaches a stable value and this value will be
recorded. The measurement system response time and initial system bias will be determined from these data. The
System Bias for each gas must be within 5.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5o/o absolute difference.
Central Valley - Salt Lake City, UTAST-2023-4301
82 of87
Page 3-2
Site Specific Test Plan
I'esting Methodology
High or Mid Level gas (whichever is closer to the stack gas concentration) will be introduced at the probe. After the
analyzer response is stable, the value will be recorded. Next, Low Level gas will be introduced at ttre probe, and the
analyzer value will be recorded once it reaches a stable response. The System Bias for each gas must be within 5.0
percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5o/o absolute difference or the data is invalidated and the Calibration Error Test
and System Bias must be repeated.
The Drift between pre- and post-run System Bias must be within 3 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5%o absolute
difference or the Calibration Error Test and System Bias must be repeated.
To determine the number of sampling points, a gas stratification check will be conducted prior to initiating testing.
The pollutant concentrations will be measured at twelve traverse points (as described in Method l) or three points
(16.7, 50.0 and 83.3 percent of the measurement line). Each traverse point will be sampled for a minimum of twice
the system response time.
If the pollutant concentration at each traverse point do not differ more than 5%o or 0.5 0.3% (whichever is less
restrictive) of the average pollutant concentration, then single point sampling will be conducted during the test runs.
If the pollutant concentration does not meet these specifications but differs less than l0o/o or 0.5% from the average
concentration, then three (3) point sampling will be conducted (stacks less than 7.8 feet in diameter - 16.7, 50.0 and
83.3 percent of the measurement line; stacks greater than 7.8 feet in diameter - 0.4, 1.0, and 2.0 meters from the
stack wall). If the pollutant concentration differs by more than l0%o or 0.5% from the average concentration, then
sampling will be conducted at a minimum of twelve ( I 2) traverse points. Copies of stratification check data will be
included in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix of the report.
A Data Acquisition System with battery backup will be used to record the instrument response in one (l) minute
averages. The data will be continuously stored as a *.CSV file in Excel format on the hard drive of a computer. At
the completion of testing, the data will also be saved to the AST server. All data will be reviewed by the Field Team
Leader before leaving the facility. Once arriving at AST's office, all written and electronic data will be relinquished
to the report coordinator and then a final review will be performed by the Project Manager.
3.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Method 320
EPA Protocol I Calibration Gases - Cylinder calibration gases used will meet EPA Protocol I (+l- 2yA standards or
will be certified standards.
After providing ample time for the FTIR to reach the desired temperature and to stabilize, zero gas (nitrogen) will be
introduced directly to the instrument sample port. While flowing nitrogen the signal amplitude will be recorded, a
background spectra will be taken, a linearity check will be performed and recorded, the peak to peak noise and the
root mean square in the spectral region of interest will be measured and a screenshot will be recorded.
Following the zero gas checks, room air will be pulled through the sample chamber and the line width and resolution
will be verified to be at 1879 cm-r, the peak position will be entered and the FWHH will be recorded (screenshot).
Following these checks, another background spectra will be recorded and the calibration transfer standard (CTS)
will be introduced directly to the instrument sample port. The CTS instrument recovery will be recorded and the
instrument mechanical response time will be measured.
Central Valley - Salt Lake City, UTAST-2023-4301
83 of87
Page 3-3
FAlArEe
ii i-t .-) i i i:.)
Site Specilic Test Plan
Testins Metlodolog)
Next, stack gas will be introduced to the FTIR through the sampling system and several scans will be taken until a
stable reading will be achieved. The native concentration of our sunogate or target spiking analyte will be recorded.
Spike gas will be introduced to the sampling system at a constant flow rate < l0% of the total sample flow rate and a
corresponding dilution ratio will be calculated along with a system response time. Matrix spike recovery spectra
will be recorded and will be within the + 30o/o of the calculated value of the spike concentration that the method
requires.
The matrix spike recovery will be conducted once at the beginning of the testing and the CTS recovery procedures
will be repeated following each test run. The corresponding values will be recorded.
Central Valley - Salt Lake City, UTAST-2023-4301
84 of 87
Page 3-4
AII
Site Specilic Test Plan
Oualitv Assurance P ropram
4.0 Quality Assurance Program
Alliance follows the procedures outlined in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Management Plan to ensure the
continuous production of useful and valid data throughout the course of this test program. The QC checks and
procedures described in this section represent an integral part of the overall sampling and analytical scheme.
Adherence to prescribed procedures is quite often the most applicable QC check.
4.1 Equipment
Field test equipment is assigned a unique, permanent identification number. Prior to mobilizing for the test
program, equipment is inspected before being packed to detect equipment problems prior to arriving on site. This
minimizes lost time on the job site due to equipment failure. Occasional equipment failure in the field is
unavoidable despite the most rigorous inspection and maintenance procedures. Therefore, replacements for critical
equipment or components are brought to the job site. Equipment retuming from the field is inspected before it is
returned to storage. During the course of these inspections, items are cleaned, repaired, reconditioned and
recal ibrated where necessary.
Calibrations are conducted in a manner, and at a frequency, which meets or exceeds U.S. EPA specifications. The
calibration procedures outlined in the U.S. EPA Methods, and those recommended within the Quality Assurance
Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems: Volume III (EPA-600/R-941038c, September 1994) are utilized.
When these methods are inapplicable, methods such as those prescribed by the American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM) or other nationally recognized agency may be used. Data obtained during calibrations is checked
for completeness and accuracy. Copies ofcalibration forms are included in the report.
The following sections elaborate on the calibration procedures followed by Alliance for these items of equipment.
r Pitot Tubes and Manometers. Type-S pitot tubes that meet the geometric criteria required by U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method 2 are assigned a coefficient of 0.84 unless a specific coefficient has been
determined from a wind tunnel calibration. If a specific coefficient from a wind tunnel calibration has been
obtained that coefficient will be used in lieu of 0.84. Standard pitot tubes that meet the geometric criteria
required by U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 are assigned a coefficient of 0.99. Any pitot tubes not
meeting the appropriate geometric criteria are discarded and replaced. Manometers are verified to be level
and zeroed prior to each test run and do not require further calibration.
r Temperature Measuring Devices. All thermocouple sensors mounted in Dry Gas Meter Consoles are
calibrated semi-annually with a NlST-traceable thermocouple calibrator (temperature simulator) and
verified during field use using a second NlST-traceable meter. NlST-traceable thermocouple calibrators
are calibrated annually by an outside laboratory.
. Disital Calipers. Calipers are calibrated annually by Alliance by using gage blocks that are calibrated
annually by an outside laboratory.
o Barometer. The barometric pressure is obtained from a nationally recognized agency or a calibrated
barometer. Calibrated barometers are checked prior to each field trip against a mercury barometer. The
barometer is acceptable if the values agree within + 2 percent absolute. Barometers not meeting this
requirement are adjusted or taken out ofservice.
o Other Eouipment. A mass flow controller calibration is conducted on each Environics system annually
following the procedures in the Manufacturer's Operation manual. A methane/ethane penetration factor
check is conducted on the total hydrocarbon analyzers equipped with non-methane cutters every six (6)
.J.*
TA
Central Valley - Salt Lake City, UTAST-2023-430t
85 of87
Page 4- I
l- i: C l'l \l l{i,&.: (i 1"1 C) i.l [::
Site Specific Test Plan
Ouali ty Assurance P rogram
months following the procedures in 40 CFR 60, Subpart JJJJ. Other equipment such as probes, umbilical
lines, cold boxes, etc. are routinely maintained and inspected to ensure that they are in good working order.
They are repaired or replaced as needed.
4.2 Field Sampling
Field sampling will be done in accordance with the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for the applicable test
method(s). General QC measures for the test program include:
. The sampling port will be sealed to prevent air from leaking from the port.
o All raw data will be maintained in organized manner.
o All raw data will be reviewed on a daily basis for completeness and acceptability.
Central Valley - Salt Lake City, UTAST-2023-4301
86 of87
Page 4-2
, **ii,i aa,)ii,[-r.rnli i.ir or
i r''rv!3qi:\i=Nn1g9!3!!I"Yi'--l
JAil 1 1 ?024
DIVISION OF AIR OUALITY
I
_l
I
Jen 2 Nox CO VOC 2024
Reference Methods 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, & 19
Source Information
Company Name Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility
Company Contact:Bryan Mansell
Contact Phone No.[phone]
Stack Designation:Jenbacher #2
Test & Review Dates
Test Date:12/15/2023 &
Review Date: 1/17/2024
Observer:Unobserved
Reviewer:Paul Morris
Emission Limits Emission Rates
VOC NOX CO VOC NOX CO
lbs./MMBtu
g/bHP-hr 0.3 0.6 2.5 0.16 0.396 1.893
ppm
Percent
%O2 Correction as a whole #
Test Information Heat Input
Stack I.D. inches As ft^2 Y Dl H @ Cp Pbar Pq (static)
fuel flow rate
(Btu/hr.)
Heat Input
(Btu/hr.)
20.00 2.182 0.84 25.88 1
Contractor Information
Contact: Charles Horton
Contracting Company: Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Address: 3683 W 2270 S, Suite E West Valley City, UT 84120
Phone No.: [phone]
Project No.:

Division of Air Quality
Instrumental Reference Methods - Gaseous Measurements
Round
Method 19 - F factors for Coal, Oil, and Gas
Fd Fw Fc
scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu
Diluent
F factor used
O2
CO2
Anthrocite 2
Bituminous 2
Lignite
Natural
Propane
Butane
10100
COAL
OIL
GAS
9780
9860
9190
8710
8710
8710
10540
10640
11950
320
10610
10200
10390
1970
1800
1910
1420
1040
1190
1250
Wet CEM
Correct For O2
CO2 Interference w/CO
Yes
Yes
Yes
Jen 2 Nox CO VOC 2024
Division of Air Quality
NSPS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification Test - CEMS Certification
Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility
Jenbacher #2
Average Emission
Dry VOC NOX CO
lbs./MMbtu Average % concentration
lbs./hr.0.83 2.11 10.08 CO2 O2
ppm or % 23.73 57.40 450.73 6.65 11.48
0.16 0.40 1.89
Run 1 Enter O2 or CO2
Dry VOC
NOX CO CO2 O2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)EBW, HP 2415 E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 2.719E-06 6.940E-06 3.309E-05
lbs./hr.0.85 2.16 10.32 6.64 11.58
ppm or %23.80 58.10 455.10 6.49 11.44
Run 2
Dry VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)EBW, HP 2415 E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 2.674E-06 7.071E-06 3.277E-05
lbs./hr.0.82 2.16 9.99 6.68 11.44
ppm or %23.40 59.20 450.70 6.49 11.29 Raw Value
Run 3
Dry VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)EBW, HP 2415 E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 2.742E-06 6.558E-06 3.246E-05
lbs./hr.0.84 2.00 9.92 6.65 11.43
ppm or %24.00 54.90 446.400 6.49 11.24 Raw Value
Run 4
Dry VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm or %Raw Value
Run 5
Dry VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm or %Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
Raw Value
g/bHP-hr
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
O2
CO2
Clear
lbs./MMBTU
Jen 2 Nox CO VOC 2024
Calibration Error Test
Test Date December 15, 2023 O2
CS - Cal. Span 23.98
Units %
Cylinder No. Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.25% Passed Cal.
CC764364 09/19/31 Mid-level 12.00 11.97 0.03 0.13% Passed Cal.
High-level 23.98 23.97 0.01 0.04% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of CS - Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.04%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date December 15, 2023 CO2
CS - Cal. Span 23.90
Units %
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 -0.04 0.04 0.167% Passed Cal.
CC764364 09/19/31 Mid-level 12.00 11.87 0.13 0.544% Passed Cal.
High-level 23.90 23.81 0.09 0.377% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.21%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date December 15, 2023 VOC
CS - Cal. Span 50.00
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
Mid-level 25.00 25.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
High-level 50.00 50.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.00%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date December 15, 2023 NOx
CS - Cal. Span 100.00
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
Mid-level 50.00 50.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
High-level 100.00 100.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.00%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date December 15, 2023 CO
2.5 CS - Cal. Span 500.00
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
Mid-level 250.00 250.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
High-level 500.00 500.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.00%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Jen 2 Nox CO VOC 2024
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility
VOC NOX CO CO2 O2 Jenbacher #2
CS Calibration Span 50.00 100.00 500.00 23.90 23.98
Units ppm ppm ppm % % Unprotected
CV - Cylinder Value: VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 25.00 50.00 250.00 12.00 12.00
High-Level 50.00 100.00 500.00 23.90 23.98
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.2% 50.0%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CDir CMA 50.00 100.00 500.00 12.00 12.00
Calibration Error Test
Cs - Measured Concentration VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.04 0.06
Mid-Level 25.00 50.00 250.00 11.87 11.97
High-Level 50.00 100.00 500.00 23.81 23.97
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 50.00 100.00 500.00 11.87 11.97
Low-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.17% 0.25%
ppmdv Difference 0 0 0 0.04 0.06
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.54% 0.13%
ppmdv Difference 0 0 0 0.13 0.03
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.38% 0.04%
ppmdv Difference 0 0 0 0.09 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 -0.01 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.25% 0.29%± 5% of Span
Difference 0 0 0 0.06 0.07
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 50.00 100.00 500.00 11.79 11.83
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.33% 0.58%
Difference 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.14
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:12/15/2023 SO2
VOC NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
23.8 58.1 455.10 6.5 11.4 CO
47.6% 58.1% 91.0% 27.2% 47.7% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.02 0.08 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.08% 0.08%± 5% of Span
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 50.00 100.00 500.00 11.68 11.88
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.79% 0.38%
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.17% 0.21% Drift
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.46% 0.21%
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass
Jenbacher #2 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
2.182 25.88 1.00 25.95 340 6.64 11.58 81.78 29.53 28.37
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 9.4052
0.0000 0.84 0.1010 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs
(ft/sec.)Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
1.0303 77.100 346,920 10,094 311,880.82 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.95 0.975 335
2 1.10 1.049 338
3 1.20 1.095 339
4 1.30 1.140 339
5 1.30 1.140 340
6 1.30 1.140 340
7 1.10 1.049 341
8 1.00 1.000 341
9 0.88 0.938 336
10 0.92 0.959 338
11 0.95 0.975 339
12 1.00 1.000 340
13 1.10 1.049 341
14 1.00 1.000 342
15 1.00 1.000 342
16 0.95 0.975 342
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
CO Calibration Gas
Failed Bias Dialog
Jen 2 Nox CO VOC 2024
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility
VOC NOX CO CO2 O2 Jenbacher #2
CS Calibration Span 50.00 100.00 500.00 23.90 23.98
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value: VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 25.00 50.00 250.00 12.00 12.00
High-Level 50.00 100.00 500.00 23.90 23.98
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.2% 50.0%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 50.00 100.00 500.00 12.00 12.00
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.04 0.06
Mid-Level 25.00 50.00 250.00 11.87 11.97
High-Level 50.00 100.00 500.00 23.81 23.97
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 50.00 100.00 500.00 11.87 11.97
Low-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.17% 0.25%
ppmdv Difference 0 0 0 0.04 0.06
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.54% 0.13%
ppmdv Difference 0 0 0 0.13 0.03
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.38% 0.04%
ppmdv Difference 0 0 0 0.09 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.02 0.08 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.08% 0.08%± 5% of Span
Difference 0 0 0 0.02 0.02
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 50.00 100.00 500.00 11.68 11.88
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.79% 0.38%
Difference 0 0 0 0.19 0.09
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:12/15/2023 SO2
VOC NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
23.4 59.2 450.70 6.5 11.3 CO
46.8% 59.2% 90.1% 27.2% 47.1% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.01 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.29% 0.21%± 5% of Span
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 50.00 100.00 500.00 11.71 11.81
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.67% 0.67%
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.21% 0.13% Response Spec.
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.13% 0.29%
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass
Jenbacher #2 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
2.18 25.88 1.00 25.95 340 6.68 11.44 81.88 29.53 28.37
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws
0.0000 0.84 0.1010 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
1.0081 75.48 339,259 9,882 304,993.92 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.90 0.949 337
2 1.00 1.000 338
3 1.00 1.000 340
4 1.10 1.049 340
5 1.10 1.049 341
6 1.00 1.000 341
7 1.00 1.000 341
8 0.84 0.917 342
9 0.79 0.889 335
10 0.85 0.922 340
11 1.00 1.000 341
12 1.20 1.095 341
13 1.30 1.140 342
14 1.20 1.095 342
15 1.10 1.049 343
16 0.95 0.975 343
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
Jen 2 Nox CO VOC 2024
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility
VOC NOX CO CO2 O2 Jenbacher #2
CS Calibration Span 50.00 100.00 500.00 23.90 23.98
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value: VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 25.00 50.00 250.00 12.00 12.00
High-Level 50.00 100.00 500.00 23.90 23.98
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.2% 50.0%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 50.00 100.00 500.00 12.00 12.00
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.04 0.06
Mid-Level 25.00 50.00 250.00 11.87 11.97
High-Level 50.00 100.00 500.00 23.81 23.97
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 50.00 100.00 500.00 11.87 11.97
Low-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.17% 0.25%
ppmv Difference 0 0 0 0.04 0.06
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.54% 0.13%
ppmv Difference 0 0 0 0.13 0.03
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.38% 0.04%
ppmv Difference 0 0 0 0.09 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.01 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.29% 0.21%± 5% of Span
Difference 0 0 0 0.07 0.05
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 50.00 100.00 500.00 11.71 11.81
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.67% 0.67%
Difference 0 0 0 0.16 0.16
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:12/15/2023 SO2
VOC NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
24.0 54.9 446.40 6.5 11.2 CO
48.0% 54.9% 89.3% 27.2% 46.9% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.17% 0.25%± 5% of Span
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 50.00 100.00 500.00 11.70 11.80
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.71% 0.71%
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.13% 0.04% Response Spec.
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.04% 0.04%
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass
Jenbacher #2 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
2.18 25.88 1.00 25.95 340 6.65 11.43 81.92 29.52 28.39
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws
0.0000 0.84 0.0980 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
1.0076 75.41 338,944 9,873 305,727.90 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.88 0.938 337
2 0.95 0.975 338
3 1.00 1.000 340
4 1.10 1.049 340
5 1.10 1.049 341
6 1.20 1.095 341 FT```
7 1.10 1.049 341
8 1.00 1.000 342
9 0.96 0.980 335
10 0.99 0.995 340
11 1.10 1.049 341
12 1.00 1.000 341
13 1.10 1.049 342
14 1.10 1.049 342
15 0.82 0.906 343
16 0.88 0.938 343
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
Jen 2 NMHC 2024
Reference Methods 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, & 19
Source Information
Company Name Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility
Company Contact:Bryan Mansell
Contact Phone No.[phone]
Stack Designation:Jenbacher #2
Test & Review Dates
Test Date:12/15/2023 &
Review Date: 1/25/2024
Observer:Unobserved
Reviewer:Paul Morris
Emission Limits Emission Rates
NMHC NOX CO NMHC NOX CO
lbs./MMBtu
g/bHP-hr 0.3 0.6 2.5 0.27 0.000 0.000
ppm
Percent
%O2 Correction as a whole #
Test Information Heat Input
Stack I.D. inches As ft^2 Y Dl H @ Cp Pbar Pq (static)
fuel flow rate
(Btu/hr.)
Heat Input
(Btu/hr.)
20.00 2.182 0.84 25.88 1
Contractor Information
Contact: Charles Horton
Contracting Company: Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Address: 3683 W 2270 S, Suite E West Valley City, UT 84120
Phone No.: [phone]
Project No.:

Division of Air Quality
Instrumental Reference Methods - Gaseous Measurements
Round
Method 19 - F factors for Coal, Oil, and Gas
Fd Fw Fc
scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu
Diluent
F factor used
O2
CO2
Anthrocite 2
Bituminous 2
Lignite
Natural
Propane
Butane
10100
COAL
OIL
GAS
9780
9860
9190
8710
8710
8710
10540
10640
11950
320
10610
10200
10390
1970
1800
1910
1420
1040
1190
1250
Wet CEM
Correct For O2
CO2 Interference w/CO
Yes
Yes
Yes
Jen 2 NMHC 2024
Division of Air Quality
NSPS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification Test - CEMS Certification
Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility
Jenbacher #2
Average Emission
Dry NMHC NOX CO
lbs./MMbtu Average % concentration
lbs./hr.1.45 CO2 O2
ppm or % 41.19 6.65 11.48
0.27
Run 1 Enter O2 or CO2
Dry NMHC
NOX CO CO2 O2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)EBW, HP 2415 E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 4.746E-06
lbs./hr.1.48 6.64 11.58
ppm or %41.54 6.49 11.44
Run 2
Dry NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)EBW, HP 2415 E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 4.654E-06
lbs./hr.1.42 6.68 11.44
ppm or %40.73 6.49 11.29 Raw Value
Run 3
Dry NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)EBW, HP 2415 E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 4.720E-06
lbs./hr.1.44 6.65 11.43
ppm or %41.31 6.49 11.24 Raw Value
Run 4
Dry NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm or %Raw Value
Run 5
Dry NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm or %Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
Raw Value
g/bHP-hr
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
O2
CO2
Clear
lbs./MMBTU
Jen 2 NMHC 2024
Calibration Error Test
Test Date December 15, 2023 O2
CS - Cal. Span 23.98
Units %
Cylinder No. Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.25% Passed Cal.
CC764364 09/19/31 Mid-level 12.00 11.97 0.03 0.13% Passed Cal.
High-level 23.98 23.97 0.01 0.04% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of CS - Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.04%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date December 15, 2023 CO2
CS - Cal. Span 23.90
Units %
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 -0.04 0.04 0.167% Passed Cal.
CC764364 09/19/31 Mid-level 12.00 11.87 0.13 0.544% Passed Cal.
High-level 23.90 23.81 0.09 0.377% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.21%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date December 15, 2023 NMHC
CS - Cal. Span 100.00
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
Mid-level 50.00 50.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
High-level 100.00 100.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.00%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date December 15, 2023 NOx
CS - Cal. Span 100.00
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
Mid-level 50.00 50.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
High-level 100.00 100.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.00%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date December 15, 2023 CO
2.5 CS - Cal. Span 500.00
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
Mid-level 250.00 250.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
High-level 500.00 500.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.00%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Jen 2 NMHC 2024
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility
NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2 Jenbacher #2
CS Calibration Span 100.00 100.00 500.00 23.90 23.98
Units ppm ppm ppm % % Unprotected
CV - Cylinder Value: NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 50.00 50.00 250.00 12.00 12.00
High-Level 100.00 100.00 500.00 23.90 23.98
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.2% 50.0%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CDir CMA 100.00 100.00 500.00 12.00 12.00
Calibration Error Test
Cs - Measured Concentration NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.04 0.06
Mid-Level 50.00 50.00 250.00 11.87 11.97
High-Level 100.00 100.00 500.00 23.81 23.97
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 100.00 100.00 500.00 11.87 11.97
Low-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.17% 0.25%
ppmdv Difference 0 0 0 0.04 0.06
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.54% 0.13%
ppmdv Difference 0 0 0 0.13 0.03
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.38% 0.04%
ppmdv Difference 0 0 0 0.09 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 -0.01 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.25% 0.29%± 5% of Span
Difference 0 0 0 0.06 0.07
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 100.00 100.00 500.00 11.79 11.83
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.33% 0.58%
Difference 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.14
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:12/15/2023 SO2
NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
41.5 6.5 11.4 CO
41.5% 0.0% 0.0% 27.2% 47.7% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.02 0.08 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.08% 0.08%± 5% of Span
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 100.00 100.00 500.00 11.68 11.88
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.79% 0.38%
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.17% 0.21% Drift
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.46% 0.21%
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass
Jenbacher #2 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
2.182 25.88 1.00 25.95 340 6.64 11.58 81.78 29.53 28.37
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 9.4052
0.0000 0.84 0.1010 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs
(ft/sec.)Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
1.0303 77.100 346,920 10,094 311,880.82 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.95 0.975 335
2 1.10 1.049 338
3 1.20 1.095 339
4 1.30 1.140 339
5 1.30 1.140 340
6 1.30 1.140 340
7 1.10 1.049 341
8 1.00 1.000 341
9 0.88 0.938 336
10 0.92 0.959 338
11 0.95 0.975 339
12 1.00 1.000 340
13 1.10 1.049 341
14 1.00 1.000 342
15 1.00 1.000 342
16 0.95 0.975 342
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
CO Calibration Gas
Failed Bias Dialog
Jen 2 NMHC 2024
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility
NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2 Jenbacher #2
CS Calibration Span 100.00 100.00 500.00 23.90 23.98
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value: NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 50.00 50.00 250.00 12.00 12.00
High-Level 100.00 100.00 500.00 23.90 23.98
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.2% 50.0%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 100.00 100.00 500.00 12.00 12.00
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.04 0.06
Mid-Level 50.00 50.00 250.00 11.87 11.97
High-Level 100.00 100.00 500.00 23.81 23.97
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 100.00 100.00 500.00 11.87 11.97
Low-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.17% 0.25%
ppmdv Difference 0 0 0 0.04 0.06
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.54% 0.13%
ppmdv Difference 0 0 0 0.13 0.03
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.38% 0.04%
ppmdv Difference 0 0 0 0.09 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.02 0.08 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.08% 0.08%± 5% of Span
Difference 0 0 0 0.02 0.02
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 100.00 100.00 500.00 11.68 11.88
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.79% 0.38%
Difference 0 0 0 0.19 0.09
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:12/15/2023 SO2
NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
40.7 6.5 11.3 CO
40.7% 0.0% 0.0% 27.2% 47.1% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.01 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.29% 0.21%± 5% of Span
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 100.00 100.00 500.00 11.71 11.81
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.67% 0.67%
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.21% 0.13% Response Spec.
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.13% 0.29%
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass
Jenbacher #2 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
2.18 25.88 1.00 25.95 340 6.68 11.44 81.88 29.53 28.37
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws
0.0000 0.84 0.1010 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
1.0081 75.48 339,259 9,882 304,993.92 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.90 0.949 337
2 1.00 1.000 338
3 1.00 1.000 340
4 1.10 1.049 340
5 1.10 1.049 341
6 1.00 1.000 341
7 1.00 1.000 341
8 0.84 0.917 342
9 0.79 0.889 335
10 0.85 0.922 340
11 1.00 1.000 341
12 1.20 1.095 341
13 1.30 1.140 342
14 1.20 1.095 342
15 1.10 1.049 343
16 0.95 0.975 343
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
Jen 2 NMHC 2024
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility
NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2 Jenbacher #2
CS Calibration Span 100.00 100.00 500.00 23.90 23.98
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value: NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 50.00 50.00 250.00 12.00 12.00
High-Level 100.00 100.00 500.00 23.90 23.98
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.2% 50.0%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 100.00 100.00 500.00 12.00 12.00
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.04 0.06
Mid-Level 50.00 50.00 250.00 11.87 11.97
High-Level 100.00 100.00 500.00 23.81 23.97
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 100.00 100.00 500.00 11.87 11.97
Low-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.17% 0.25%
ppmv Difference 0 0 0 0.04 0.06
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.54% 0.13%
ppmv Difference 0 0 0 0.13 0.03
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.38% 0.04%
ppmv Difference 0 0 0 0.09 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.01 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.29% 0.21%± 5% of Span
Difference 0 0 0 0.07 0.05
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 100.00 100.00 500.00 11.71 11.81
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.67% 0.67%
Difference 0 0 0 0.16 0.16
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:12/15/2023 SO2
NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
41.3 6.5 11.2 CO
41.3% 0.0% 0.0% 27.2% 46.9% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.17% 0.25%± 5% of Span
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 100.00 100.00 500.00 11.70 11.80
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.71% 0.71%
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.13% 0.04% Response Spec.
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.04% 0.04%
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass
Jenbacher #2 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
2.18 25.88 1.00 25.95 340 6.65 11.43 81.92 29.52 28.39
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws
0.0000 0.84 0.0980 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
1.0076 75.41 338,944 9,873 305,727.90 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.88 0.938 337
2 0.95 0.975 338
3 1.00 1.000 340
4 1.10 1.049 340
5 1.10 1.049 341
6 1.20 1.095 341 FT```
7 1.10 1.049 341
8 1.00 1.000 342
9 0.96 0.980 335
10 0.99 0.995 340
11 1.10 1.049 341
12 1.00 1.000 341
13 1.10 1.049 342
14 1.10 1.049 342
15 0.82 0.906 343
16 0.88 0.938 343
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
Jen 4 Nox CO VOC 2024
Reference Methods 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, & 19
Source Information
Company Name Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility
Company Contact:Bryan Mansell
Contact Phone No.[phone]
Stack Designation:Jenbacher Engine #4
Test & Review Dates
Test Date:12/14/2023 &
Review Date: 1/17/2024
Observer:Unobserved
Reviewer:Paul Morris
Emission Limits Emission Rates
VOC NOX CO VOC NOX CO
lbs./MMBtu
g/bHP-hr 0.3 0.6 2.0 0.14 0.395 1.711
ppm
Percent
%O2 Correction as a whole #
Test Information Heat Input
Stack I.D. inches As ft^2 Y Dl H @ Cp Pbar Pq (static)
fuel flow rate
(Btu/hr.)
Heat Input
(Btu/hr.)
20.00 2.182 0.84 25.80 1.07
Contractor Information
Contact: Charles Horton
Contracting Company: Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Address: 3683 W 2270 S, Suite E West Valley City, UT 84120
Phone No.: [phone]
Project No.:

Round
Division of Air Quality
Instrumental Reference Methods - Gaseous Measurements
Method 19 - F factors for Coal, Oil, and Gas
Fd Fw Fc
scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu
Diluent
F factor used
O2
CO2
Anthrocite 2
Bituminous 2
Lignite
Natural
Propane
Butane
10100
COAL
OIL
GAS
9780
9860
9190
8710
8710
8710
10540
10640
11950
320
10610
10200
10390
1970
1800
1910
1420
1040
1190
1250
Wet CEM
Correct For O2
CO2 Interference w/CO
Yes
Yes
Yes
Jen 4 Nox CO VOC 2024
Division of Air Quality
NSPS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification Test - CEMS Certification
Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility
Jenbacher Engine #4
Average Emission
Dry VOC NOX CO
lbs./MMbtu Average % concentration
lbs./hr.0.72 2.10 9.11 CO2 O2
ppm or % 21.17 59.00 419.67 6.56 11.24
0.14 0.40 1.71
Run 1 Enter O2 or CO2
Dry VOC
NOX CO CO2 O2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)EBW, HP 2414 E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 2.308E-06 7.872E-06 2.831E-05
lbs./hr.0.68 2.33 8.37 6.49 11.20
ppm or %20.20 65.90 389.30 6.52 11.20
Run 2
Dry VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)EBW, HP 2416 E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 2.354E-06 7.358E-06 3.029E-05
lbs./hr.0.71 2.22 9.14 6.63 11.24
ppm or %20.60 61.60 416.60 6.52 11.18 Raw Value
Run 3
Dry VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)EBW, HP 2415 E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 2.594E-06 5.913E-06 3.294E-05
lbs./hr.0.77 1.76 9.82 6.55 11.27
ppm or %22.70 49.50 453.100 6.43 11.01 Raw Value
Run 4
Dry VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm or %Raw Value
Run 5
Dry VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm or %Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
Raw Value
g/bHP-hr
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
O2
CO2
Clear
lbs./MMBTU
Jen 4 Nox CO VOC 2024
Calibration Error Test
Test Date December 14, 2023 O2
CS - Cal. Span 23.98
Units %
Cylinder No. Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Passed Cal.
CC764364 09/19/31 Mid-level 12.00 11.86 0.14 0.58% Passed Cal.
High-level 23.98 23.98 0.00 0.00% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of CS - Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.04%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date December 14, 2023 CO2
CS - Cal. Span 23.90
Units %
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.293% Passed Cal.
CC764364 09/19/31 Mid-level 11.96 11.96 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
High-level 23.90 23.78 0.12 0.502% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.04%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date December 14, 2023 VOC
CS - Cal. Span 50.00
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
Mid-level 25.00 25.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
High-level 50.00 50.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.00%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date December 14, 2023 NOx
CS - Cal. Span 100.00
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
Mid-level 50.00 50.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
High-level 100.00 100.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.00%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date December 14, 2023 CO
2 CS - Cal. Span 500.00
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
Mid-level 250.00 250.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
High-level 500.00 500.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.00%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Jen 4 Nox CO VOC 2024
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility
VOC NOX CO CO2 O2 Jenbacher Engine #4
CS Calibration Span 50.00 100.00 500.00 23.90 23.98
Units ppm ppm ppm % % Unprotected
CV - Cylinder Value: VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 25.00 50.00 250.00 11.96 12.00
High-Level 50.00 100.00 500.00 23.90 23.98
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CDir CMA 50.00 100.00 500.00 11.96 12.00
Calibration Error Test
Cs - Measured Concentration VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00
Mid-Level 25.00 50.00 250.00 11.96 11.86
High-Level 50.00 100.00 500.00 23.78 23.98
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 50.00 100.00 500.00 11.96 11.86
Low-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.29% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0 0 0 0.07 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.58%
ppmdv Difference 0 0 0 0 0.14
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.50% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0 0 0 0.12 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.21% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference 0 0 0 0.05 0
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 50.00 100.00 500.00 12.00 12.00
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.17% 0.58%
Difference 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.14
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:12/14/2023 SO2
VOC NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
20.2 65.9 389.30 6.5 11.2 CO
40.4% 65.9% 77.9% 27.3% 46.7% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.29% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 50.00 100.00 500.00 12.00 12.00
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.17% 0.58%
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.08% 0.00% Drift
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass
Jenbacher Engine #4 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
2.182 25.80 1.07 25.88 363 6.49 11.20 82.31 29.49 28.28
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 12.7739
0.0000 0.84 0.1050 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs
(ft/sec.)Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
0.9948 75.740 330,290 9,916 295,609.98 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.87 0.933 361
2 0.82 0.906 361
3 0.92 0.959 362
4 1.30 1.140 363
5 1.20 1.095 363
6 1.20 1.095 363
7 0.95 0.975 363
8 0.88 0.938 362
9 1.00 1.000 362
10 1.10 1.049 363
11 1.10 1.049 363
12 1.10 1.049 363
13 0.95 0.975 363
14 0.88 0.938 364
15 0.86 0.927 363
16 0.79 0.889 363
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
CO Calibration Gas
Failed Bias Dialog
Jen 4 Nox CO VOC 2024
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility
VOC NOX CO CO2 O2 Jenbacher Engine #4
CS Calibration Span 50.00 100.00 500.00 23.90 23.98
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value: VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 25.00 50.00 250.00 11.96 12.00
High-Level 50.00 100.00 500.00 23.90 23.98
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 50.00 100.00 500.00 11.96 12.00
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00
Mid-Level 25.00 50.00 250.00 11.96 11.86
High-Level 50.00 100.00 500.00 23.78 23.98
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 50.00 100.00 500.00 11.96 11.86
Low-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.29% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0 0 0 0.07 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.58%
ppmdv Difference 0 0 0 0 0.14
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.50% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0 0 0 0.12 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.29% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference 0 0 0 0.07 0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 50.00 100.00 500.00 12.00 12.00
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.17% 0.58%
Difference 0 0 0 0.04 0.14
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:12/14/2023 SO2
VOC NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
20.6 61.6 416.60 6.6 11.2 CO
41.2% 61.6% 83.3% 27.6% 46.6% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.04% 0.33%± 5% of Span
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 50.00 100.00 500.00 11.72 11.86
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1.00% 0.00%
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.25% 0.33% Response Spec.
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.84% 0.58%
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass
Jenbacher Engine #4 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
2.18 25.80 1.07 25.88 362 6.63 11.24 82.13 29.51 28.35
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws
0.0000 0.84 0.1010 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
1.0115 76.90 335,502 10,068 301,616.30 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 1.00 1.000 360
2 0.99 0.995 360
3 1.00 1.000 361
4 1.10 1.049 361
5 1.20 1.095 362
6 1.20 1.095 362
7 1.00 1.000 362
8 1.00 1.000 362
9 0.98 0.990 362
10 1.00 1.000 362
11 1.10 1.049 363
12 1.10 1.049 363
13 1.00 1.000 364
14 0.95 0.975 364
15 0.90 0.949 364
16 0.88 0.938 364
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
Jen 4 Nox CO VOC 2024
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility
VOC NOX CO CO2 O2 Jenbacher Engine #4
CS Calibration Span 50.00 100.00 500.00 23.90 23.98
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value: VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 25.00 50.00 250.00 11.96 12.00
High-Level 50.00 100.00 500.00 23.90 23.98
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 50.00 100.00 500.00 11.96 12.00
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00
Mid-Level 25.00 50.00 250.00 11.96 11.86
High-Level 50.00 100.00 500.00 23.78 23.98
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 50.00 100.00 500.00 11.96 11.86
Low-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.29% 0.00%
ppmv Difference 0 0 0 0.07 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.58%
ppmv Difference 0 0 0 0 0.14
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.50% 0.00%
ppmv Difference 0 0 0 0.12 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.04% 0.33%± 5% of Span
Difference 0 0 0 0.01 0.08
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 50.00 100.00 500.00 11.72 11.86
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1.00% 0.00%
Difference 0 0 0 0.24 0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:12/14/2023 SO2
VOC NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
22.7 49.5 453.10 6.4 11.0 CO
45.4% 49.5% 90.6% 26.9% 45.9% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 -0.10 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.17% 0.42%± 5% of Span
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 50.00 100.00 500.00 11.66 11.59
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1.26% 1.13%
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.13% 0.08% Response Spec.
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.25% 1.13%
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass
Jenbacher Engine #4 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
2.18 25.80 1.07 25.88 363 6.55 11.27 82.18 29.50 28.30
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws
0.0000 0.84 0.1040 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
1.0019 76.25 332,540 9,983 297,955.64 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.90 0.949 359
2 0.92 0.959 360
3 1.00 1.000 360
4 1.10 1.049 361
5 1.00 1.000 362
6 1.10 1.049 362 FT```
7 0.99 0.995 363
8 0.96 0.980 363
9 0.90 0.949 361
10 1.10 1.049 363
11 1.10 1.049 363
12 1.20 1.095 364
13 1.00 1.000 365
14 1.00 1.000 365
15 0.90 0.949 365
16 0.92 0.959 365
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
Jen 4 NMHC 2024
Reference Methods 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, & 19
Source Information
Company Name Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility
Company Contact:Bryan Mansell
Contact Phone No.[phone]
Stack Designation:Jenbacher Engine #4
Test & Review Dates
Test Date:12/14/2023 &
Review Date: 1/25/2024
Observer:Unobserved
Reviewer:Paul Morris
Emission Limits Emission Rates
NMHC NOX CO NMHC NOX CO
lbs./MMBtu
g/bHP-hr 0.3 0.6 2.0 0.24 0.000 0.000
ppm
Percent
%O2 Correction as a whole #
Test Information Heat Input
Stack I.D. inches As ft^2 Y Dl H @ Cp Pbar Pq (static)
fuel flow rate
(Btu/hr.)
Heat Input
(Btu/hr.)
20.00 2.182 0.84 25.80 1.07
Contractor Information
Contact: Charles Horton
Contracting Company: Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Address: 3683 W 2270 S, Suite E West Valley City, UT 84120
Phone No.: [phone]
Project No.:

Division of Air Quality
Instrumental Reference Methods - Gaseous Measurements
Round
Method 19 - F factors for Coal, Oil, and Gas
Fd Fw Fc
scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu
Diluent
F factor used
O2
CO2
Anthrocite 2
Bituminous 2
Lignite
Natural
Propane
Butane
10100
COAL
OIL
GAS
9780
9860
9190
8710
8710
8710
10540
10640
11950
320
10610
10200
10390
1970
1800
1910
1420
1040
1190
1250
Wet CEM
Correct For O2
CO2 Interference w/CO
Yes
Yes
Yes
Jen 4 NMHC 2024
Division of Air Quality
NSPS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification Test - CEMS Certification
Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility
Jenbacher Engine #4
Average Emission
Dry NMHC NOX CO
lbs./MMbtu Average % concentration
lbs./hr.1.30 CO2 O2
ppm or % 38.01 6.56 11.24
0.24
Run 1 Enter O2 or CO2
Dry NMHC
NOX CO CO2 O2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)EBW, HP 2414 E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 4.018E-06
lbs./hr.1.19 6.49 11.20
ppm or %35.17 6.52 11.20
Run 2
Dry NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)EBW, HP 2416 E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 4.229E-06
lbs./hr.1.28 6.63 11.24
ppm or %37.01 6.52 11.18 Raw Value
Run 3
Dry NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)EBW, HP 2415 E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 4.783E-06
lbs./hr.1.43 6.55 11.27
ppm or %41.86 6.43 11.01 Raw Value
Run 4
Dry NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm or %Raw Value
Run 5
Dry NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm or %Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
Raw Value
g/bHP-hr
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
O2
CO2
Clear
lbs./MMBTU
Jen 4 NMHC 2024
Calibration Error Test
Test Date December 14, 2023 O2
CS - Cal. Span 23.98
Units %
Cylinder No. Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Passed Cal.
CC764364 09/19/31 Mid-level 12.00 11.86 0.14 0.58% Passed Cal.
High-level 23.98 23.98 0.00 0.00% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of CS - Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.04%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date December 14, 2023 CO2
CS - Cal. Span 23.90
Units %
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.293% Passed Cal.
CC764364 09/19/31 Mid-level 11.96 11.96 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
High-level 23.90 23.78 0.12 0.502% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.04%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date December 14, 2023 NMHC
CS - Cal. Span 50.00
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
Mid-level 25.00 25.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
High-level 50.00 50.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.00%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date December 14, 2023 NOx
CS - Cal. Span 100.00
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
Mid-level 50.00 50.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
High-level 100.00 100.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.00%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date December 14, 2023 CO
2 CS - Cal. Span 500.00
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
Mid-level 250.00 250.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
High-level 500.00 500.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.00%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Jen 4 NMHC 2024
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility
NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2 Jenbacher Engine #4
CS Calibration Span 50.00 100.00 500.00 23.90 23.98
Units ppm ppm ppm % % Unprotected
CV - Cylinder Value: NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 25.00 50.00 250.00 11.96 12.00
High-Level 50.00 100.00 500.00 23.90 23.98
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CDir CMA 50.00 100.00 500.00 11.96 12.00
Calibration Error Test
Cs - Measured Concentration NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00
Mid-Level 25.00 50.00 250.00 11.96 11.86
High-Level 50.00 100.00 500.00 23.78 23.98
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 50.00 100.00 500.00 11.96 11.86
Low-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.29% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0 0 0 0.07 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.58%
ppmdv Difference 0 0 0 0 0.14
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.50% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0 0 0 0.12 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.21% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference 0 0 0 0.05 0
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 50.00 100.00 500.00 12.00 12.00
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.17% 0.58%
Difference 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.14
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:12/14/2023 SO2
NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
35.2 6.5 11.2 CO
70.3% 0.0% 0.0% 27.3% 46.7% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.29% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 50.00 100.00 500.00 12.00 12.00
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.17% 0.58%
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.08% 0.00% Drift
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass
Jenbacher Engine #4 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
2.182 25.80 1.07 25.88 363 6.49 11.20 82.31 29.49 28.28
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 12.7739
0.0000 0.84 0.1050 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs
(ft/sec.)Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
0.9948 75.740 330,290 9,916 295,609.98 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.87 0.933 361
2 0.82 0.906 361
3 0.92 0.959 362
4 1.30 1.140 363
5 1.20 1.095 363
6 1.20 1.095 363
7 0.95 0.975 363
8 0.88 0.938 362
9 1.00 1.000 362
10 1.10 1.049 363
11 1.10 1.049 363
12 1.10 1.049 363
13 0.95 0.975 363
14 0.88 0.938 364
15 0.86 0.927 363
16 0.79 0.889 363
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
CO Calibration Gas
Failed Bias Dialog
Jen 4 NMHC 2024
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility
NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2 Jenbacher Engine #4
CS Calibration Span 50.00 100.00 500.00 23.90 23.98
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value: NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 25.00 50.00 250.00 11.96 12.00
High-Level 50.00 100.00 500.00 23.90 23.98
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 50.00 100.00 500.00 11.96 12.00
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00
Mid-Level 25.00 50.00 250.00 11.96 11.86
High-Level 50.00 100.00 500.00 23.78 23.98
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 50.00 100.00 500.00 11.96 11.86
Low-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.29% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0 0 0 0.07 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.58%
ppmdv Difference 0 0 0 0 0.14
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.50% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0 0 0 0.12 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.29% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference 0 0 0 0.07 0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 50.00 100.00 500.00 12.00 12.00
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.17% 0.58%
Difference 0 0 0 0.04 0.14
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:12/14/2023 SO2
NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
37.0 6.6 11.2 CO
74.0% 0.0% 0.0% 27.6% 46.6% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.04% 0.33%± 5% of Span
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 50.00 100.00 500.00 11.72 11.86
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1.00% 0.00%
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.25% 0.33% Response Spec.
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.84% 0.58%
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass
Jenbacher Engine #4 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
2.18 25.80 1.07 25.88 362 6.63 11.24 82.13 29.51 28.35
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws
0.0000 0.84 0.1010 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
1.0115 76.90 335,502 10,068 301,616.30 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 1.00 1.000 360
2 0.99 0.995 360
3 1.00 1.000 361
4 1.10 1.049 361
5 1.20 1.095 362
6 1.20 1.095 362
7 1.00 1.000 362
8 1.00 1.000 362
9 0.98 0.990 362
10 1.00 1.000 362
11 1.10 1.049 363
12 1.10 1.049 363
13 1.00 1.000 364
14 0.95 0.975 364
15 0.90 0.949 364
16 0.88 0.938 364
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
Jen 4 NMHC 2024
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility
NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2 Jenbacher Engine #4
CS Calibration Span 50.00 100.00 500.00 23.90 23.98
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value: NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 25.00 50.00 250.00 11.96 12.00
High-Level 50.00 100.00 500.00 23.90 23.98
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 50.00 100.00 500.00 11.96 12.00
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00
Mid-Level 25.00 50.00 250.00 11.96 11.86
High-Level 50.00 100.00 500.00 23.78 23.98
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 50.00 100.00 500.00 11.96 11.86
Low-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.29% 0.00%
ppmv Difference 0 0 0 0.07 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.58%
ppmv Difference 0 0 0 0 0.14
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.50% 0.00%
ppmv Difference 0 0 0 0.12 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.04% 0.33%± 5% of Span
Difference 0 0 0 0.01 0.08
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 50.00 100.00 500.00 11.72 11.86
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1.00% 0.00%
Difference 0 0 0 0.24 0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:12/14/2023 SO2
NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
41.9 6.4 11.0 CO
83.7% 0.0% 0.0% 26.9% 45.9% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values NMHC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 -0.10 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.17% 0.42%± 5% of Span
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 50.00 100.00 500.00 11.66 11.59
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1.26% 1.13%
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.13% 0.08% Response Spec.
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.25% 1.13%
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass
Jenbacher Engine #4 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
2.18 25.80 1.07 25.88 363 6.55 11.27 82.18 29.50 28.30
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws
0.0000 0.84 0.1040 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
1.0019 76.25 332,540 9,983 297,955.64 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.90 0.949 359
2 0.92 0.959 360
3 1.00 1.000 360
4 1.10 1.049 361
5 1.00 1.000 362
6 1.10 1.049 362 FT```
7 0.99 0.995 363
8 0.96 0.980 363
9 0.90 0.949 361
10 1.10 1.049 363
11 1.10 1.049 363
12 1.20 1.095 364
13 1.00 1.000 365
14 1.00 1.000 365
15 0.90 0.949 365
16 0.92 0.959 365
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog