DAQ-2024-004342

1

DAQC-1354-23
Site ID 10237 (B4)

MEMORANDUM

TO: STACK TEST FILE – PAFICIFICORP ENERGY – Hunter Power Plant

THROUGH: Harold Burge, Major Source Compliance Section Manager

FROM: Paul Morris, Environmental Scientist

DATE: December 18, 2023

SUBJECT: Location: Hunter Power Plant, Castle Dale, Carbon County, Utah
Contact: Jay Howard: 435-748-6519
Tester: Montrose Air Quality Services: 303-495-3936
Source: Units 1-3
FRS ID #: UT0000004901500101
Permit# Title V operating permit 1500101004 dated September 4, 2020, revised
November 19, 2021
Subject: Review of Pretest Protocol dated December 15, 2023

On December 15, 2023 (email), the Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) received a protocol for testing of
the PacifiCorp Energy Hunter Power Plant Units 1-3, located in Castle Dale, Utah. Testing will be
performed February 13-15, 2024, to determine PM emission rates of Units 1-3 in accordance with Title V
Permit Conditions II.B.2.a, II.B.2.j, II.B.3.a, and II.B.3.h.

PROTOCOL CONDITIONS:

1. RM 1 used to determine sample velocity traverses; OK
2. RM 2 used to determine stack gas velocity and volumetric flow rate; OK
3. RM 3A/B used to determine dry molecular weight of the gas stream; OK
4. RM 4 used to determine moisture content; OK
5. RM 5 used to determine particulate emissions; OK
6. RM 202 used to determine CPM emissions; OK
DEVIATIONS: No deviations were noted.

CONCLUSION: The protocol appears to be acceptable.

RECOMMENDATION: Send protocol review and test date confirmation notice.

ATTACHMENT: Test protocol dated December 15, 2023.

6 , 3


Source Test Plan for
Annual 2024 Compliance Testing
Units 1, 2 and 3
PacifiCorp
Hunter Power Plant
Castle Dale, Utah
Prepared For:
PacifiCorp
1407 W North Temple, Suite 210
Salt Lake City, Utah 84116
Prepared By:
Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC
990 West 43rd Avenue
Denver, CO 80211
For Submission To:
Utah Division of Air Quality
195 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84116
Document Number: GP043AS-023437-PP-772
Proposed Test Dates: February 13 - 15, 2024
Submittal Date: January 13, 2024
PacifiCorp
2024 Compliance Source Test Plan
I certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the information contained in this document is
complete and accurate and conforms to the requirements of the Montrose Quality
Management System and ASTM D7036-04.
Signature: Date:12/1/2023
Name:Matthew Parks Title:QA/QC Analyst
I have reviewed, technically and editorially, details and other appropriate written materials
contained herein. I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge the presented material
is authentic and accurate and conforms to the requirements of the Montrose Quality
Management System and ASTM D7036-04.
Signature:Date:12/1/2023
Name:Tim Wojtach Title:Account Manager
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 2 of 43
PacifiCorp
2024 Compliance Source Test Plan
Table of Contents
Section Page
1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................5
1.1 Summary of Test Program.............................................................................5
1.2 Applicable Regulations and Emission Limits......................................................6
1.3 Key Personnel..............................................................................................7
2.0 Plant and Sampling Location Descriptions................................................................8
2.1 Process Description, Operation, and Control Equipment.....................................8
2.2 Flue Gas Sampling Locations..........................................................................8
2.3 Operating Conditions and Process Data ...........................................................8
2.4 Plant Safety................................................................................................. 9
2.4.1 Safety Responsibilities..........................................................................9
2.4.2 Safety Program and Requirements.......................................................10
3.0 Sampling and Analytical Procedures .....................................................................12
3.1 Test Methods .............................................................................................12
3.1.1 EPA Methods 5 and 202 ......................................................................12
3.2 Process Test Methods..................................................................................13
4.0 Quality Assurance and Reporting..........................................................................14
4.1 QA Audits..................................................................................................14
4.2 Quality Control Procedures ..........................................................................14
4.2.1 Equipment Inspection and Maintenance................................................14
4.2.2 Audit Samples...................................................................................14
4.3 Data Analysis and Validation........................................................................14
4.4 Sample Identification and Custody................................................................15
4.5 Quality Statement ......................................................................................15
4.6 Reporting ..................................................................................................15
4.6.1 Example Report Format......................................................................16
4.6.2 Example Presentation of Test Results...................................................17
List of Appendices
Appendix A Supporting Information...........................................................................18
Appendix A.1 Units and Abbreviations..................................................................19
Appendix A.2 Accreditation Information/Certifications............................................
Appendix “S” Field Work Safety Plan..........................................................................2
List of Tables
Table 1-1 Summary of Test Program and Proposed Schedule..........................................5
Proposed Test Date ....................................................................................................5
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 3 of 43
PacifiCorp
2024 Compliance Source Test Plan
Table 1-2 Reporting Units and Emission Limits..............................................................6
Table 1-3 Test Personnel and Responsibilities ...............................................................7
Table 2-1 Sampling Location(s)...................................................................................8
Table 4-1 Example <Parameter> Emissions Results - Unit Name...................................17
List of Figures
Figure 3-1 EPA Methods 5 and 202 Sampling Train.......................................................13
Figure 4-1 Typical Report Format ..............................................................................16
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 4 of 43
PacifiCorp
2024 Compliance Source Test Plan
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Summary of Test Program
PacifiCorp contracted Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC (Montrose) to perform an
emissions test program at the Hunter Power Plant located in Castle Dale, Utah. The tests
are conducted to determine compliance with the applicable UDEQ permitDQG1(6+$3
6XESDUW88888.
The specific objectives are to:
x Perform annual Particulate Matter (PM) emissions testing on the exhaust
stacks of Units 1, 2 and 3.
x Perform diagnostic Condensable Particulate Matter (CPM) emissions testing
on the exhaust stacks of Units 1, 2 and 3.
x Conduct the test program with a focus on safety
Montrose will provide the test personnel and the necessary equipment to measure emissions
as outlined in this test plan. Facility personnel will provide the process and production data
to be included in the final report. A summary of the test program and proposed schedule is
presented in Table 1-1.
Table 1-1
Summary of Test Program and Proposed Schedule
Proposed
Test Date
Unit ID/
Source Name Activity/Parameters Test Methods
No. of
Runs
Duration
(Minutes)
2/13/2024 Unit 1 PM, CPM EPA M5, 202 3 120
2/14/2024 Unit 2 PM, CPM EPA M5, 202 3 120
2/15/2024 Unit 3 PM, CPM EPA M5, 202 3 120
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 5 of 43
PacifiCorp
2024 Compliance Source Test Plan
To simplify this test plan, a list of Units and Abbreviations is included in Appendix A.
Throughout this test plan, chemical nomenclature, acronyms, and reporting units are not
defined. Please refer to the list for specific details.
1.2 Applicable Regulations and Emission Limits
The results from this test program are presented in units consistent with those listed in the
applicable regulations or requirements. The reporting units and emission limits are
presented in Table 1-2.
Table 1-2
Reporting Units and Emission Limits
Unit ID/
Source Name Parameter Reporting Units Emission Limit Emission Limit Reference
Units 1 - 3 PM lb/mmBtu 0.030 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUUUU
Unit 1 - 2 PM lb/mmBtu 0.015 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart D
Unit 3 PM lb/mmBtu 0.02 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Da
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 6 of 43
PacifiCorp
2024 Compliance Source Test Plan
1.3 Key Personnel
A list of project participants is included below:
Facility Information
Source Location: PacifiCorp Hunter Power Plant
State Highway 10
Castle Dale, Utah 84513
Project Contact: Tom Wiscomb Jay Howard
Role: Sr. Environmental Advisor Sr. Environmental Analyst
Company: PacifiCorp PacifiCorp
Telephone: [phone] [phone]
Email: [e-mail] [e-mail]
Agency Information
Regulatory Agency: Utah Department of Air Quality
Agency Contact: Rob Leishman
Telephone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Testing Company Information
Testing Firm: Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC
Contact: Craig Kormylo
Title: District Manager
Telephone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Table 1-3 details the roles and responsibilities of the test team.
Table 1-3
Test Personnel and Responsibilities
Role Primary Assignment Additional Responsibilities
Field Project Manager Operate mobile lab Facility interface, test crew coordination
Technician Execute stack platform
responsibilities Preparation, support PM
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 7 of 43
PacifiCorp
2024 Compliance Source Test Plan
2.0 Plant and Sampling Location Descriptions
2.1 Process Description, Operation, and Control
Equipment
The Hunter Plant comprises three pulverized coal-fired boilers. Hunter Unit #1 is a dry-
bottom, tangentially-fired boiler rated at 480 gross megawatts (GMW) and equipped with a
fabric-filter baghouse for particulate matter (PM) control and a flue gas desulfurization
(FGD) scrubber for sulfur dioxide (SO2) control. Hunter Unit #2 is a dry-bottom,
tangentially-fired boiler rated at 480 GMW and equipped with low-NOx burners and overfire
air for nitrogen oxides (NOx) control, a fabric filter baghouse for PM control and an FGD
scrubber for SO2 control. Hunter Unit #3 is a dry-bottom, wall-fired boiler rated at 495
GMW and equipped with low-NOx burners and overfire air for NOx control, a fabric filter
baghouse for PM control and an FGD scrubber for SO2 control. In accordance with
Conditions II.B.2 and II.B.3 of Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ)
Operating Permit 150010100, the Unit #1, Unit #2 and Unit #3 exhaust stacks are
equipped with Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems (CEMS) to quantify carbon dioxide
(CO2), SO2 and NOx emissions. Units 1, 2 and 3 are equipped with CEMS to quantify carbon
monoxide (CO) emissions for comparison to UDEQ permit limits.
2.2 Flue Gas Sampling Locations
Actual stack measurements, number of traverse points, and location of traverse points will
be evaluated in the field as part of the test program. Table 2-1 presents the anticipated
stack measurements and traverse points for the sampling locations listed.
Table 2-1
Sampling Location(s)
Sampling
Location
Stack Inside
Diameter
(in.)
Distance from Nearest
Disturbance
Number of Traverse
Points
Downstream
EPA “B”
(in./dia.)
Upstream EPA
“A” (in./dia.)
Unit 1 322.6 3228 / 10.0 2388 / 7.4 Isokinetic: 12 (3/port)
Unit 2 340.7 3240 / 9.5 2484 / 7.3 Isokinetic: 12 (3/port)
Unit 2 307.4 3228 / 10.5 2616 / 8.5 Isokinetic: 12 (3/port)
Sample location(s) are verified in the field to conform to EPA Method 1. Acceptable cyclonic
flow conditions are confirmed prior to testing using EPA Method 1, Section 11.4.
2.3 Operating Conditions and Process Data
Emission tests are performed while the source/units and air pollution control devices are
operating at the conditions required by the applicable regulation. The units are tested when
operating normally.
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 8 of 43
PacifiCorp
2024 Compliance Source Test Plan
Plant personnel are responsible for establishing the test conditions and collecting all
applicable unit-operating data. Data collected includes the following parameters:
x Unit load (MW)
x Relevant CEMS data
2.4 Plant Safety
Montrose will comply with all safety requirements at the facility. The facility Client Sponsor,
or designated point of contact, is responsible for ensuring routine compliance with plant
entry, health, and safety requirements. The Client Sponsor has the authority to impose or
waive facility restrictions. The Montrose test team leader has the authority to negotiate any
deviations from the facility restrictions with the Client Sponsor. Any deviations must be
documented.
2.4.1 Safety Responsibilities
Planning
x Montrose must complete a field review with the Client Sponsor prior to the
project date. The purpose of the review is to develop a scope of work that
identifies the conditions, equipment, methods, and physical locations that will
be utilized along with any policies or procedures that will affect our work
x We must reach an agreement on the proper use of client emergency services
and ensure that proper response personnel are available, as needed
x The potential for chemical exposure and actions to be taken in case of
exposure must be communicated to Montrose. This information must include
expected concentrations of the chemicals and the equipment used to identify
the substances.
x Montrose will provide a list of equipment being brought to the site, if required
by the client
Project Day
x Montrose personnel will arrive with the appropriate training and credentials
for the activities they will be performing and the equipment that they will
operate
x Our team will meet daily to review the Project Scope, Job Hazard Assessment,
and Work Permits. The Client Sponsor and Operations Team are invited to
participate.
x Montrose will provide equipment that can interface with the client utilities
previously identified in the planning phase and only work with equipment that
our client has made ready and prepared for connection
x We will follow client direction regarding driving safety, safe work permitting,
staging of equipment, and other crafts or work in the area
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 9 of 43
PacifiCorp
2024 Compliance Source Test Plan
x As per 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart A, Section 60.8, the facility must provide the
following provisions at each sample location:
o Sampling ports, which meet EPA minimum requirements for testing. The
caps should be removed or be hand-tight.
o Safe sampling platforms
o Safe access to the platforms and test ports, including any scaffolding or
man lifts
o Sufficient utilities to perform all necessary testing
x Montrose will use the client communication system, as directed, in case of
plant or project emergency
x Any adverse conditions, unplanned shutdowns or other deviations to the
agreed scope and project plan must be reviewed with the Client Sponsor prior
to continuing work. This will include any safe work permit and hazard
assessment updates.
Completion
x Montrose personnel will report any process concerns, incidents or near misses
to the Client Sponsor prior to leaving the site
x Montrose will clean up our work area to the same condition as it was prior to
our arrival
x We will ensure that all utilities, connection points or equipment have been
returned to the pre-project condition or as stated in the safe work permit. In
addition, we will walk out the job completion with Operations and the Client
Sponsor if required by the facility.
2.4.2 Safety Program and Requirements
Montrose has a comprehensive health and safety program that satisfies State and Federal
OSHA requirements. The program includes an Illness and Injury Prevention Program, site-
specific safety meetings, and training in safety awareness and procedures. The basic
elements include:
x All regulatory required policies/procedures and training for OSHA, EPA,
FMCSA, and MSHA
x Medical monitoring, as necessary
x Use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and chemical detection equipment
x Hazard communication
x Pre-test and daily toolbox meetings
x Continued evaluation of work and potential hazards
x Near-miss and incident reporting procedures as required by Montrose and the
Client
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 10 of 43
PacifiCorp
2024 Compliance Source Test Plan
Montrose will provide standard PPE to employees. The PPE will include but is not limited to;
hard hats, safety shoes, glasses with side shields or goggles, hearing protection, hand
protections, and fall protection. In addition, our trailers are equipped with four gas detectors
to ensure that workspace has no unexpected equipment leaks or other ambient hazards.
The detailed Site Safety Plan for this project is attached to this test plan in Appendix “S”.
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 11 of 43
PacifiCorp
2024 Compliance Source Test Plan
3.0 Sampling and Analytical Procedures
3.1 Test Methods
The test methods for this test program have been presented in Table 1-1. Additional
information regarding specific applications or modifications to standard procedures is
presented below.
3.1.1 EPA Methods 5 and 202
Determination of Particulate Matter from Stationary Sources and Dry
Impinger Method for Determining Condensable Particulate Emissions from
Stationary Sources
EPA Methods 5 and 202 are manual, isokinetic methods used to measure FPM and CPM
emissions. The methods are performed in conjunction with EPA Methods 1 through 4. The
stack gas is sampled through a nozzle, probe, heated filter, unheated CPM filter, condenser,
and impinger train. FPM is collected from the probe and heater filter. CPM is collected from
the unheated CPM filter and the impinger train. The samples are analyzed gravimetrically.
The sum of FPM and CPM represents TPM. The FPM, CPM, and TPM results are reported in
emission concentration and emission rate units.
Pertinent information regarding the performance of the method is presented below:
o Condensed water is measured gravimetrically
o The post-test nitrogen purge is performed by passing nitrogen through the
train under pressure
o To simplify shipping arrangements to remote locations, stainless steel
probe liners and nozzles are used. After each run, the nozzle and probe
liner are brushed and washed a total of six times with reagent-grade
acetone to assure complete recovery of all particulate matter. The brush is
given a final rinse with acetone and the nozzle and probe liner are given a
final rinse with acetone and all rinsate is collected into the appropriate
sample container
The typical sampling system is detailed in Figure 3-1.
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 12 of 43
PacifiCorp
2024 Compliance Source Test Plan
Figure 3-1
EPA Methods 5 and 202 Sampling Train
3.2 Process Test Methods
The applicable regulations do not require process samples to be collected during this test
program.
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 13 of 43
PacifiCorp
2024 Compliance Source Test Plan
4.0 Quality Assurance and Reporting
4.1 QA Audits
Montrose has instituted a rigorous QA/QC program for its air quality testing. Quality
assurance audits are performed as part of the test program to ensure that the results are
calculated using the highest quality data available. This program ensures that the emissions
data we report are as accurate as possible. The procedures included in the cited reference
methods are followed during preparation, sampling, calibration, and analysis. Montrose is
responsible for preparation, calibration, and cleaning of the sampling apparatus. Montrose
will also perform the sampling, sample recovery, storage, and shipping. Approved contract
laboratories may perform some of the preparation and sample analyses, as needed.
4.2 Quality Control Procedures
Montrose calibrates and maintains equipment as required by the methods performed and
applicable regulatory guidance. Montrose follows internal procedures to prevent the use of
malfunctioning or inoperable equipment in test programs. All equipment is operated by
trained personnel. Any incidence of nonconforming work encountered during testing is
reported and addressed through the corrective action system.
4.2.1 Equipment Inspection and Maintenance
Each piece of field equipment that requires calibration is assigned a unique identification
number to allow tracking of its calibration history. All field equipment is visually inspected
prior to testing and includes pre-test calibration checks as required by the test method or
regulatory agency.
4.2.2 Audit Samples
When required by the test method and available, Montrose obtains EPA TNI SSAS audit
samples from an accredited provider for analysis along with the samples. Currently, the
SSAS program has been suspended pending the availability of a second accredited audit
sample provider. If the program is reinstated, the audit samples will be ordered. If required
as part of the test program, the audit samples are stored, shipped, and analyzed along with
the emissions samples collected during the test program. The audit sample results are
reported along with the emissions sample results.
4.3 Data Analysis and Validation
Montrose converts the raw field, laboratory, and process data to reporting units consistent
with the permit or subpart. Calculations are made using proprietary computer spreadsheets
or data acquisition systems. One run of each test method is also verified using a separate
example calculation. The example calculations are checked against the spreadsheet results
and are included in the final report. The “Standard Conditions” for this project are 29.92
inches of mercury and 68 °F.
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 14 of 43
PacifiCorp
2024 Compliance Source Test Plan
4.4 Sample Identification and Custody
The on-site Field Project Manager will assume or assign the role of sample and data
custodian until relinquishing custody. The sample custodian will follow proper custody
procedures before departing from the test site including:
x Assign the unique sample identification number to each sample
x Attach sample labels and integrity seals to all samples
x Complete COC form(s), ensuring that the sample identification numbers on
the samples match the sample identification numbers on the COC
x Pack and store samples in accordance with the test method requirements in
appropriate transport containers for protection from breakage, contamination,
or loss
x Keep samples in a secure locked area if not in the direct presence of Montrose
staff
The sample custodian will follow proper custody procedures upon arriving at the Montrose
office including:
x Remove samples and COC documents from vehicles and check into
designated secure sample holding areas
x Store samples requiring additional measures such as refrigeration or dry ice
appropriately
4.5 Quality Statement
Montrose is qualified to conduct this test program and has established a quality
management system that led to accreditation with ASTM Standard D7036-04 (Standard
Practice for Competence of Air Emission Testing Bodies). Montrose participates in annual
functional assessments for conformance with D7036-04 which are conducted by the
American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA). All testing performed by Montrose
is supervised on site by at least one Qualified Individual (QI) as defined in D7036-04
Section 8.3.2. Data quality objectives for estimating measurement uncertainty within the
documented limits in the test methods are met by using approved test protocols for each
project as defined in D7036-04 Sections 7.2.1 and 12.10. Additional quality assurance
information is included in the appendices. The content of this test plan is modeled after the
EPA Emission Measurement Center Guideline Document (GD-042).
4.6 Reporting
Montrose will prepare a final report to present the test data, calculations/equations,
descriptions, and results. Prior to release by Montrose, each report is reviewed and certified
by the project manager and their supervisor, or a peer. Source test reports will be
submitted to the facility or appropriate regulatory agency (upon customer approval) within
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 15 of 43
PacifiCorp
2024 Compliance Source Test Plan
25 days of the completion of the field work. The report will include a series of appendices to
present copies of the intermediate calculations and example calculations, raw field data,
laboratory analysis data, process data, and equipment calibration data.
4.6.1 Example Report Format
The report is divided into various sections describing the different aspects of the source
testing program. Figure 4-1 presents a typical Table of Contents for the final report.
Figure 4-1
Typical Report Format
Cover Page
Certification of Report
Table of Contents
Section
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Plant and Sampling Location Descriptions
3.0 Sampling and Analytical Procedures
4.0 Test Discussion and Results
5.0 Internal QA/QC Activities
Appendices
A Field Data and Calculations
B Facility Process Data
C Laboratory Analysis Data
D Quality Assurance/Quality Control
E Regulatory Information
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 16 of 43
PacifiCorp
2024 Compliance Source Test Plan
4.6.2 Example Presentation of Test Results
Table 4-1 presents the typical tabular format that is used to summarize the results in the
final source test report. Separate tables will outline the results for each target analyte and
compare them to their respective emissions limits.
Table 4-1
Example <Parameter> Emissions Results -
Unit Name
Parameter/Units Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date XX XX XX XX
Time XX XX XX XX
Process Data
parameter 1, units XX XX XX XX
parameter 2, units XX XX XX XX
Sampling & Flue Gas Parameters
sample duration, minutes XX XX XX XX
O2, % volume dry XX XX XX XX
CO2, % volume dry XX XX XX XX
flue gas temperature, °F XX XX XX XX
moisture content, % volume XX XX XX XX
volumetric flow rate, dscfm XX XX XX XX
<Parameter>
ppmvd XX XX XX XX
ppmvd @ 15% O2 XX XX XX XX
lb/hr XX XX XX XX
tons/yr XX XX XX XX
lb/MMBtu XX XX XX XX
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 17 of 43
PacifiCorp
2024 Compliance Source Test Plan
Appendix A
Supporting Information
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 18 of 43
PacifiCorp
2024 Compliance Source Test Plan
Appendix A.1
Units and Abbreviations
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 19 of 43







  
























 


!


!"

#$
%

&'()*
 
 
+$*

 *  


,
$
+-

",
$
.*
,

/  
0


,1
0%
%
,2(3341 2(222&1


*

"
5 6

77
,
5 6

",8



99 

9%* * 
%
* 

* 


 ", 1
5

:

 ,**
; 


  ,**
 '



*


<


 :
 ,**
=



"
*
 *
 ,**
 '


=5 
 
*
 ,**




"
*
 %6

 ,**
**



* 


 ", 1
> *, **
>


  ,**
?



  ,**
; 

,*
 

 


;

77
,

;

",

  

  

*


  


 6 ,1==9
*
*

*


*

*




8


 

  @222 *
*
 1 *
  

 




GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 20 of 43




A*

"
*

" " 
 ,*&2
'
B "

*


B'
 2(2&CD 1
BD 
 2(22))4($'1E!
"" 
B**
4C(D31

"%%
 

*



1 **

1==9**
9
*
*


 
=F 
,
 
'








* ,
=
 %
"G ,16

8 
8

 
= 
 &2
) 


 H 



==F
==91 9*

* 



,


(%( =I 
 %

=
 %
"G%
,16

=I 
 %
 
%

*
 


-  
 *

,
$
** 
-"*

,
$
- 
 *

 

,
$
*** *

*** *
,

*** *

, 
*** *

*** *
,

*** *

, 
**%* *

,%

-
"*

,
$
***
8

***
8


***
8


- 
*

,3(3
$
J
 % 
,,
J
 % 
, ,
J
 % 
,  ,
! 
&(4C($
'1E!

GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 21 of 43




>9*6 

",*
>9*
6 

",*
 

 

*

 

*


 


 

*




,8((, 8


 

 &222"
K2(3@C 6

K




*

,!LDC3()@ F
K


 


*

,!LDC3()@ F
 M222*
* 1 *

* 1 *


K


"


*

,!LDC3()@ F
K

*

 
?
?


",
?%



%,
?
$

*

, 
?
*
  

,'
?



 

,

 ,
?"
*
,
?


" 77
,
?

"
,

*


?%
%
* 

,

 ,
?%
%
* *
 *
,
?%
%
* *
 
,
I %
I%




%,
I*%
*
, 
I%

, 
N  

  ,


GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 22 of 43
55> **
 *
5;-  
*

5F 7
 
 ,*

*
5;




5;H 



5FK9 5 FK
9
5>**
 

5>K=5
>
  K
5=

95K 


 

9;H 
%


9$- "
 
*%

9A 
  

9H>"8 





;  
F  

F=

F=>
 

F!=>
 
 

FK  
 

 !


!

<5 

$O>


 

,$,O,,>


O<
 
6



7


=>* 

-=

* 


-=>* 

 

K  

K=


K

7

?55>*  **
 *
;

8


;F 
 


;
* 

76*6
*P
;HH 





;O<
6


F;

 *



FAK F

AK 
FH;



 

 
F=-


*

 
F-5 Q>F 
- 
5

F-!A F
 -%
!

 A

F>
 **

F>-

 *
*
FQ

Q  "
<;

 7
A 
7
A5 
77

A;
7


-;
*
 


-=

* 


KA!  
6   
*
 *
K-9 
 * "
K!9 
 

"
 * 

7 *P
<  *



GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 23 of 43



<1=>  *1*
 *
< 55> *
 
 **
 *
< 


<$<



$5-7  *
$  
$$?



$-H*
 
8  *
$!<1$!=>6
  *16
*
 *
$!><






A  *
A5-
6*
 * *
A-!  *%*6

A-6=>
*
*6*
 *
A! 
 
A>A
>  7
"I "%
H <
H$?%



H-<8
*
 

=5K 


 

=;A 


*


=;H 



=O
 *

=!H 

* 
=>*
 
 
O5 **
 

O5>A O  5 5>
A* 


O<6



O;



O;A!6*

 

OF>$5-OF>   $7 5 -
O< 
OA>$OA
  *>
5$

OA>K OA
> 5K

O=6



O=6

 *
O=?6


 *
O-; 
** 


O>->O
%> 
-
 
> 
>$5 *>
5$
5 
-5$*   
-9 * 
*
*
-I-*%*
%* 
-F - 
F

- 5>*
6* "
- 5>
-A*7
-A;*7


-=* 


-=&2 * 


&2 


-=(C * 


(C 


-=* 

->*
 
*

->;* 
7
 
->FH *


->K *
 
*


-KF *




-K=*
 



GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 24 of 43



J51J8 
8 
JA J
A
J>KA J
> 
K
A
!5

 
!55

 
!5K

 

!5K5

 

!K  
  

7

!AF  
* 



!=





!K





7

>5= 
>; 





>!





>; 

>
6?>K 

 **
 
>!= 





K5-
 *
K9;




K5 
7

K;



K<OFO=
6

6

 *
K<O=
6

 *
K<
 *
K$  
KA



*
K

7

K
 F-5=
K6&C
K-=* 


K>-*

* 


KKF 
*  


QH>; 6% 


Q? 
  

?F 


?
 *
?>K 
 *
 
I%

IIK-%
%


*
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 25 of 43
5
>



5  

> 


9  
>'  


9


>
 


 K;;
  
7

K; 
  
7 
>
K<
 
 
$ 

K$   
$'$


K 
$'$
 K!> 

 *
$D 

R 7
$D





$)


'$D 

'$)* *


'$4 * *

)$C$*

 

 



 



 


  
**

F





F$


$ 

$%

$ 
*



$> 


$>D  
$ 
 

$
 
A-5 * *
=;A 


*


=



 

=FB 

"


=
$

=


O 

O$'
O"

O 


O 



O
 






-** 
-

-;;* 

76*6

-; * 

7 
>



GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 26 of 43
PacifiCorp
2024 Compliance Source Test Plan
Appendix A.2
Accreditation Information/Certifications
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 27 of 43

Accredited Air Emission Testing Body

A2LA has accredited
MONTROSE AIR QUALITY SERVICES

In recognition of the successful completion of the joint A2LA and Stack Testing Accreditation Council (STAC)
evaluation process, this laboratory is accredited to perform testing activities in compliance with
ASTM D7036:2004 - Standard Practice for Competence of Air Emission Testing Bodies.

Presented this 4th day of February 2022.

_______________________
Vice President, Accreditation Services
For the Accreditation Council
Certificate Number 3925.01
Valid to February 29, 2024

This accreditation program is not included under the A2LA ILAC Mutual Recognition Arrangement.
A merican Association for Laboratory Accreditation
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 28 of 43
PacifiCorp
2024 Compliance Source Test Plan
Appendix “S”
Field Work Safety Plan
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 29 of 43

SITE SAFETY PLAN BOOKLET

Project: _____________________
Customer: ___________________
Location: ____________________
Units: _______________________
Client Project Manager: ______________________
Revision Date:January 21, 2022
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 30 of 43
Page 1 of 2

Site Safety Plan and JHA Purpose and Instructions

Purpose
Employee safety is the top priority of Montrose Environmental Group. All employees must be
trained to assess and mitigate hazards. The District Manager and Project Manager are
responsible to ensure all hazards have been properly identified and managed. All employees
have Stop Work Authority in all situations where an employee feels they or their co-worker
cannot perform a job safely or if there is a task for which they have not been adequately trained.
The Site Safety Plan (SSP) has been developed to help assist Montrose test crews with
identifying physical and health hazards and determining how the hazards will be managed.
Additionally, the SSP will help each crew manage the safety of the employees by providing
emergency procedures and information. The booklet contains a several safety forms that may
be required in the field.
Instructions
The SSP consists of the following:

communicated to all employees, signed, and posted.
Supervisor/ CPM will ensure that this Emergency Action Plan Form is completed,
CPM will maintain a roster and be responsible for accounting for all employees. The Job
to work commencing. In the event of an emergency situation/ evacuation, the Job Supervisor/
emergency and evacuation procedures, assembly/ rally points, alert systems, and signals prior
the Emergency Action Plan form and ensure that all employees are familiar with the facility
4. Emergency Action Plan -The Job Supervisor/ Client Project Manager (CPM) will complete
observed plus applicable PPE that may be required.
administrative controls that a crew can use to reduce or eliminate the hazards they have
3. Hazard Control Matrix - contains useful information on both engineering and
with the toolbox topic and signatures can be added to the SSP packet.
the hazard analysis is required daily for the duration of the test. An additional sheet of paper
modified when conditions change. A toolbox meeting with a daily topic in addition to a review of
sign on the Job Hazard Analysis form in agreement and sign in Section 10. The JHA is to be
Each team member has the option to discuss making changes or adding to the JHA and must
Section 9 will require at least three tasks, hazards and controls be identified for the project.
form for accuracy, making any corrections required and complete the remainder of the JHA.
complete the JHA form through section 8. Upon arrival at the test site, the team will review the
daily hazard review with sign off by the team.The client Project Manager is responsible to
task/site’s particular hazards and controls. The form also includes a daily toolbox topic and
2. A Job Hazard Analysis is a standardized, two-page, fillable form that is used to evaluated the
prior to the test.
1. A Pre-Mobilization Test Plan – To be completed in it’s entirety by the client project Manager
AQS-FRM-1.13R1
Extended Hours Formc.
Heat Stress Prevention Form Based on Heat Indexb.
MEWP Lift Inspection Forma.
Additional Forms, as applicable5.
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 31 of 43
Page 2 of 2

Site Safety Plan and JHA Purpose and Instructions

The SSP is a living document. The Project Manager should continually update their SSPs as
new information and conditions change or if new hazards are presented.
Each completed SSP should be maintained with the Test Plan in the office for a period of 3
years. There will be an audit process developed for the Site Safety Plans.

AQS-FRM-1.13R1
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 32 of 43
Page 1 of 2
PRE-MOBILIZATION TEST INFORMATION

Source Type: New Source: ____ Revisit: ____ Prj#/Date/Tech: __________________________
Coal Fired Electric Utility: ____ Ethanol Plant: ____ Chemical Mfg. of _________________________
Cement/Lime Kiln Plant: ____ Specialty Mfg. of: ___________ Other: _______________

Anticipated Effluent Composition – check all that apply and fill in expected concentration in ppm/%

CO NOX SO2 VOC other
If other, explain: _______________________________________________________

Flammable: _______ Toxic: ________ Corrosive: _______ Dust: __________
Engineering Controls to be Implemented:
______________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
Additional Safety Equipment Required:
Personal gas monitors: ____
Respiratory Protection:
Half Face____ Full Face____ HEPA Filters____ Supplied Air: _____ (Safety Dept. Approval)
Approximate Flue Gas Temperatures, (F)

below 210 210 to 450 450 to 950 above 950 other
If other, explain: _______________________________________________________
Approximate Duct Pressure, (iwg):

below -3 -3 to +3 +3 to +7 above +7 other
If other, explain: _______________________________________________________

PROJECT NAME/LOCATION: ______________________ PROJECT #: ____________________
TEST DATE: ______________________ PROJECT MANAGER: ___________________
TEST SCOPE: _________________________________________________________________
SITE CONTACT: Name: _____________________ Contact Phone: _________________________
AQS-FRM-1.17
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 33 of 43
Page 2 of 2
PRE-MOBILIZATION TEST INFORMATION

Sampling Location: Stack Port ____ Duct Port ____
Approximate Sampling Platform Height, (ft)

Effluent Chemical Regulatory Limits

Gas Name Chemical
Formula
Cal OSHA PEL1
(ppm)
Cal OSHA
STEL2
(ppm)
NIOSH REL
TWA3 (ppm)
Cal OSHA
Ceiling
(ppm)
IDLH4
(ppm)
Carbon Monoxide CO 25 200 35 200 1,200
Nitric Oxide NOx 25 ND5 25 ND 100
Sulfur Dioxide SO2 2 5 2 ND 100
Hydrogen Chloride HCl 0.3 2 ND 2 50
Hydrogen Sulfide H2S 10 15 10 (10 min.)C 50 100
California Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) based on an 8 -hour shift;
2: Cal OSHA Short-term Exposure Limit (STEL) based on a 15-minute period;
3: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Recommended Exposure Limit (REL) Time-weighted Average (TWA) based
on an 8-hour shift;
4: Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health (IDLH);
5: Not Defined (ND);
C: Ceiling Limit - Maximum allowable human exposure limit for an airborne or gaseous substance, which is not to be exceeded, even
momentarily.

Prepared by: Date:
Reviewed by: Date:

______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Additional Information:
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Describe how equipment will be mobilized to the sampling location:
Other:_____________________________________________________________________________
Guardrails: ____ Toe plate: ____ Engineered Tie Off Points: ____ Heat Shield: ____
Elevators: ____ Ladders: ____ MEWP Lift: ____ Scaffold: ____ Equipment Hoist: ____
Access and Protection:
If other, explain: _______________________________________________________
below 6 6 to 50 50 to 100 above 100 other
AQS-FRM-1.17
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 34 of 43
Job Hazard Analysis 1 of 3
1.
Client Rep
Job Preparation
Job Site Walk Through Completed Site Specific Training Complete
Safe Work Permit Received from Client
2.Facility Information/Emergency Preparedness
If non-emergency medical attention is needed, call: AXIOM #: 877-502-9466.
Plant Emergency # Certified First Aid Person:
EMS Location Evacuation Routes Rally Point
Severe Weather Shelter Location Eye Wash & Safety Shower Location
Operational: Yes No
Source Information: (list type):
Stack Gas Temp. (oF)Stack Gas Press. ("H2O)Stack Gas Components:
Stack Gas Inhalation Potential?Yes No If yes, see List of Hazard Chemicals.
3.Error Risk
Time Pressure Remote Work Location > 12 hr shift Working > 8 consecutive days
Lack of procedures Extreme temps, wind >30mph Personal illness/fatigue Vague work guidance
Monotonous Activity First day back after time off Multiple job locations Other:
4.Physical Hazards Hazard Controls
Dust Hazards Dust Mask Goggles Other:
Thermal Burn Hot Gloves Heat Shields Other Protective Clothing:
Electrical Hazards Connections Protected from Elements External GFCI Other:
XP Rating Requirement Intrinsically Safe Requirement
Inadequate Lighting Install Temporary Lighting Headlamps
Slip and Trip Housekeeping Barricade Area Other:
Hand Protection Cut Resistant Gloves Pinch Pts. General Electrical Impact Resistant
Other:
Potential Hazards for Consideration
Secondary Permits Hot Work Confined Space
Excavation
Working from Heights Falling objects Fall protection Drop zone protection Platform load ratings
See also Sect. 7 Scaffold inspection Ladder inspection Barricades for equipment
Electrical Exposed wire/connector Verify equipment grounding Arc Flash
Lifting Crane lift plan Rigging inspection Tag lines used Hoists in place
Respiratory Unexpected exposure Chemical Dust (combustible) PEL provided
See also Sect. 8 Cartridges or supplied air available Gas detection equipment
5.Required PPE Hard Hats Safety Glasses Safety Toe Shoe/Boot Hearing Protection Safety Spotter
Hi-Vis Vests Harness/Lanyard*Goggles Personal Monitor Type:
Metatarsal Guards Hot Gloves Face Shield Respirator Type:
Nomex/FRC Other PPE:
Client Contact Name Date
Facility SSP Writer PM
If the heat index is expected to be above 91°, fill out the Heat Stress Prevention Form.
All hazards and mitigation steps must be documented.
If this JHA does not cover all the hazards identified,
use Section 9 to document that information.
AQS-FRM-1.18
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 35 of 43
Job Hazard Analysis 2 of 3
Additional Work Place Hazards
6.Critical Procedures – check all that apply – *indicates additional form must be completed or collected from client
Heat Stress Prevention* Confined Space* Roof Work Scaffold
Cold Weather Work Hazardous Energy Control* Other:
7.Working From Heights
Fall Protection Fixed Guardrails/Toe boards Fall Prevention PPE Warning Line System
Falling Objects Protection Barricading Netting House Keeping Tethered Tools Catch Blanket or Tarp
Fall Hazard Communication Adjacent/Overhead Workers Contractor Contact Client Contact
8.Other Considerations
Environmental Hazards - Weather Forecast
Heat/Cold Lightning Rain Snow Ice Tornado Wind Speed
Steps for Mitigation:
Electrical Safety Planning
Plant Hook up:110V 220/240V 480V Generator Hard wired into panel
Electrical Classified Area: Yes No Trailer Grounded: Yes No Plug Type
Electrical Hook Up Responsibility:
List of Hazardous Chemicals Other Chemicals:
Acetone Nitric Acid Hydrogen Peroxide Compressed Gases
Hexane Sulfuric Acid Isopropyl Alcohol Flammable Gas
Toluene Hydrochloric Acid Liquid Nitrogen Non-Flammable Gas
H2S Carbon Monoxide
Steps for Mitigation:
Wildlife/Fauna in Area
Poison Ivy Poison Oak Insects: Wildlife:
Personnel w/ known allergies to bees stings or other allergens?Yes No
9.Observed Hazards and Mitigation Steps
Task Potential Hazard(s) Steps for Mitigation
● 11
22
33
● 11
22
33
● 11
22
33
● 11
22
33
Exposure Monitoring
MEWP*
AQS-FRM-1.18
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 36 of 43
Job Hazard Analysis 3 of 3
10.JHA REVIEW: Crew Names & Signatures
11.Daily JHA Meeting & Review
Items to review:
● Change in conditions ● Extended work hours ● Daily Safety Topic
● New workers or contractors ● Occurrence of near misses or injuries
Printed Name Signature
2
Discussion TopicDay
Initialing demonstrates that site conditions and hazards have not changed from the original SSP. If changes did occur, make the
necessary updates to this JHA and add notes as applicable in Section 9.
Initials
9
8
7
6
3
Date Printed Name Signature Date
5
4
11
10
AQS-FRM-1.18
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 37 of 43
1
2
3
4
5
6 Local Hospital/ Clinic Telephone Number:
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
MEG Job Supervisor/ CPM's Telephone Number:
Plant's #1 Contact Person's Name:
Plant's #1 Contact Person's Telephone Number:
MEG Job Safety Supervisor's Telephone Number:
Plant's Emergency Telephone Number:
Emergency Ops Radio Channel:
The Fire Extinguisher is Located:
Eye Wash and Safety Shower Location:
The First Aid Kit is Located:
Page 1 of 2
The Job Supervisor/ Client Project Manager (CPM) will ensure that all employees are familiar with the facility emergency and evacuation
procedures, assembly/ rally points, alert systems, and signals prior to work commencing. In the event of an emergency situation/
evacuation, the Job Supervisor/ CPM will maintain a roster and be responsible for accounting for all employees. The Job Supervisor/
CPM will ensure that this Emergency Action Plan Form is completed, communicated to all employees, and posted.
• You must follow the client’s emergency action plan first, and notify your Supervisor immediately.
•If incident is life threatening, CALL 911 IMMEDIATELLY
• If non-emergency medical attention is needed, call AXIOM Medical number: 877-502-9466.
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN FORM
MEG Job Supervisor/ CPM's Name:
MEG Job Safety Supervisor (if applicable):
Evacuation Routes:
Severe Weather Shelter Location:
Plant's #2 Contact Person's Name:
Plant's #2 Contact Person's Telephone Number:
Designated Assembly Point Location:
AQS-FRM-1.11
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 38 of 43
1
2
4
5
Signature: Date: Printed Name: Signature: Date:
EVACUATE:____________________________________;
OTHER:_______________________________________;
Alarm Tones:
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN FORM AND EVACUATION ASSEMBLY MAP REVIEW: Crew Names and Signatures
Printed Name:
Draw the evacuation and assembly map here
Page 2 of 2
EMERGENCY EVACUATION AND ASSEMBLY MAP
3
Designated Shelter(s) Description:
Designated Assembly Point(s) Description:
YES or NO
Facility Name:
Facility Alarm (Circle):
FIRE:_________________________________________;
CHEMICAL/ GAS:_______________________________;
SHELTER-IN-PLACE:_____________________________;
AQS-FRM-1.11
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 39 of 43

Serial Number:
Make: Rented or Owned:

x Check “Yes” if an item is adequate, operational, and safe.
x Check “No” to indicate that a repair or other corrective action is required prior to use.
x Check “N/A” to indicate “Not Applicable.”
Yes No N/A

܆ ܆ ܆
2. Hydraulic fluid level is sufficient, with the platform fully lowered ܆ ܆ ܆
3. Hydraulic system pressure (see manufacturer specs) is acceptable.
If the pressure is low, determine cause and repair in accordance with accepted procedures
as outlined in service manual.
܆ ܆ ܆
4. Tires and wheel lug nuts (for tightness) ܆ ܆ ܆
5. Hoses and cables (i.e. worn areas or chafing) ܆ ܆ ܆
6. Platform rails and safety gate (no damage present) ܆ ܆ ܆
7. Pivot pins secure ܆ ܆ ܆
8. Welds are not cracked and structural members are not bent or broken ܆ ܆ ܆
9. Warning and instructional labels are legible and secure, and load capacity is clearly marked. ܆ ܆ ܆
10. Manufacturer’s Instruction Manual is present inside the bucket ܆ ܆ ܆
11. Base controls (switches and push buttons) can be properly operated ܆ ܆ ܆
12. Platform conditions are safe (i.e. not slippery) ܆ ܆ ܆
13. Fire extinguisher is present, mounted and fully charged, located inside the bucket ܆ ܆ ܆
14. Headlights, safety strobe light and back-up alarm are functional ܆ ܆ ܆
15. Workplace is free of hazards (overhead powerlines, obstructions, level surface, high winds,
etc.) *Do not operate if winds are 20 mph, unless otherwise specified by manufacturer
recommendations.
܆ ܆ ܆

Operator Name & Signature Location Date

Ground Control Name & Signature Location Date

Harness Inspections:

Printed Name Signature Date

Printed Name Signature Date

Printed Name Signature Date
Daily MEWP Lift Inspection Form
Page 1 of 1
atthe beginning of each shift or following 6 to 8 hours of use.
All checks must be completed prior to each work shift, before operation of the MEWP lift. This checklist must be used
MEWP Lift Model #:
loose hoses, etc.) – if something can be easily loosened by hand then it is not sufficient.
1.All MEWP lift components are in working condition (i.e. no loose or missing parts, torn or
Items to be Inspected
AQS-FRM-1.16
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 40 of 43
Page 1 of 1
001AS-SAFETY-FM-3
Extended Hours Safety Audit
Project Number: Date: Time:
When a project is expected to extend past a 14-hour work day, this form must be completed to evaluate
the condition of the crew, and the safety of the work environment.
Permission to proceed into extended work hours must come from a District Manager (DM) or Regional Vice
President (RVP). Technical RVPs can authorize moving forward, if they are in the field or if they are
managing the project.
1.Hold test crew meeting Test crew initials:
The test leader should look for signs of the following in their crews:
x Irritability
x Lack of motivation
x Headaches
x Giddiness
x Fatigue
x Depression
x Reduced alertness, lack of concentration and
memory
The test leader should assess the environmental and hazardous concerns:
x Temperature and weather
x Lighting
x Working from Heights
x Hoisting
x PPE (i.e. respirators, etc.)
x Pollutant concentration in ambient air (SO2,
H2S, ect.)
x Reason for extended hours
x Reason for delay
ƒProduction limitations
x Impending Weather
3.Contact the client
The PM, DM or RVP must discuss with client any identified safety concerns, the client’s needs and
mutually agree on how to proceed. Discussion should also include the appropriate rest period
needed before the next day’s work shift can begin. The DM and/or a RVP must be informed on the
final decision.
Final Outcome:
Approver:
During this time, they can come to an agreement on how to proceed. Itemsto discuss include:
extended work period. If the DM is the acting PM on the job site, they must contact the RVP.
The PM must contact either the DM or RVP to discuss the safety issues that may arise due to the
Notify DM or RVP2.
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 41 of 43
Page 1 of 1

001AS-SAFETY-FM-5

Heat Stress Prevention Form

This form is to be used when the Expected Heat Index is above 91° F, and is to be kept with project
documentation.

Project Manager (PM): Expected High Temp:
Date(s): Expected Heat Index:

1. Review the signs of Heat Exhaustion and Heat Stroke

2. If Heat Index is above 91° F:
x Provide cold water and/or sports drinks to all field staff (avoid caffeinated drinks and energy
drinks which can increase core temperature).
o Bring no less than one gallon of water per employee
x If employee(s) are dehydrated, on blood pressure medication or not acclimated to heat,
ensure they are aware of the heightened risk for heat illness
x Provide cool head bands/vests/etc.
x Have ice available to employees
x Implement work shift rotations and breaks, particularly for employees working in direct
sunlight.
x Provide as much shade at the jobsite as possible, including tarps, tents or other acceptable
temporary structures.
x PM should interview each field staff periodically to evaluate for signs of heat illness

3. If Heat Index is above 103° F:
x Employees must stop for drinks and breaks every hour (about 4 cups/hour)
x Employees are not permitted to work alone for more than one hour at a time without a
break offering shade and drinks
x Employees should wear cool bands and vests if working outside more than one hour at a
time
x PM should interview each field staff every 2 hours to evaluate for signs of heat illness

GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 42 of 43
PacifiCorp
2024 Compliance Source Test Plan
This is the Last Page of This Document
If you have any questions, please contact one of the following
individuals by email or phone.
Name: Craig Kormylo
Title: District Manager
Region: USA - Stack - Great Plains - Operations
Email: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
Name: Glen Capra
Title: Vice President
Region: USA – Stack
Email: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
GP043AS-023437-PP-772 Page 43 of 43