DAQ-2024-007750

1

DAQC-421-24
Site ID 10238 (B4)
MEMORANDUM

TO: STACK TEST FILE – PACIFICORP ENERGY – Huntington Power Plant

THROUGH: Harold Burge, Major Source Compliance Section Manager

FROM: Paul Morris, Environmental Scientist

DATE: May 2, 2024

SUBJECT: Location: Huntington Power Plant, Huntington, Carbon County, UT
Contact: Tom Wiscomb, – [phone]
Tester: Montrose Air Quality Resources, LLC
Source: Unit #1
FRS ID#: UT0000004901501001
Permit# Title V permit 1501001005 dated January 22, 2020, revised
August 26, 2021
Action Code: 3A
Subject: Review of Stack Test Reports dated April 16, 2024

On April 23, 2024, the DAQ received a stack test report for the PacifiCorp Energy Huntington Power
Plant Unit #1 located in Castle Dale, UT. Testing was performed on March 19, 2024, to determine
compliance with Conditions II.B.2.c, II.B.2.g, and 40 CFR 63, Subpart UUUUU for PM10 and PM
emissions. The DAQ calculated results are:

Source Test Date RM/Pollutant DAQ Result Test Result Limit
Unit #1 3/19/2024 RM 5/PM10, PM 0.013 lbs/MMBtu 0.013 lbs/MMBtu 0.030lbs/MMBtu
59 lbs/hr 58 lbs/hr 74 lbs/hr

DEVIATIONS: The emission limit references PM10. However, PM10 sampling
cannot be performed on the stack due to the presence of water
droplets. The total PM concentration was used to show
compliance with the PM10 limit. Furthermore, Unit #2 was
originally intended to be tested alongside the Unit #1. However,
due to the failure of the stack elevator, the test was postponed.
See attached Deviation Report.

CONCLUSION: The PacifiCorp Energy Huntington Power Plant stack emissions
test report for PM/PM10 emissions appears to be acceptable.

RECOMMENDATION: Unit #1 should be considered to have been in compliance with
the applicable PM/PM10 emission limits at the time of testing.

HPV: No.

ATTACHMENTS: PacifiCorp Energy – Huntington Plant test report received
April 23, 2024, Deviation Report received April 8, 2024, and
DAQ generated Excel spreadsheets.

6 , 3
YnLqlago,3P
Huntlngton Power Plant
6 mlles vve$ of Huntlngton, lltah on Hwy. 31
P.O. bx680
Huntinglon, Utah 84528
April16,2024
Mr. Brycc BirdDrcctor
Utah Dcpartmst of Environmenhl Quality
Divisionof Airauatty
195 North 1950 WGst
P.O. Box 144820
Saltlake City, IrT 84ll'l-{820
Attu Robletrhmu
SubJect: Ilree-Yeer Perdculete ltfletten @M) Performmce Tcrtl'g and the 2024 Atrtrud PM Tert
Report for thc Huntington Phnt Untt 1.
DearMr. Bird:
P$ifiCorp is subnnitting thc results of thc thrco-yoor Mersury md Air Toxios (MATS) Irw Eniuing Electric
GencratingUnit (LI?F) PMpqfonmanoc tcstinged&e 2024 AtrrilalPMTestReportfortheHuntingtonPower
Plant - Unit l. Thc tcsts werc con&rcted on lvlarch 19,2024, and mot thc requirments of40 CTR Part 63 Subpd
Uut UU along with the anmml tosting for filtciablc PM as requiredby tbe Huntington Porcr Plant Title V Pcrmit
#150100r005.
Thc tcst r€srlb indicae &c PM conissions for Unit I are loss than 50 pcrccot of the 0.030 lb/nnBtr MATS
e-rnissions limit u&ich dcmonsfatcs tbc unit continros to Enlify for PM r.F:F. stans. PacifiCorp rcquests the Utah
Depcment of Environmental Qualiry - Divisioo of Ah Quality, aoo€pt the rcsults of this tsst and grant the
Huutingtm Plmt's Unit I lvlATS I.Ft $atrs for thc ncxt throo years.
As was addresscd in a dodation rcpo,rt lefrc oft,mittod to yor office April5, 2$24,fuVrrrt2 - Thrcc-Year LEE
PM Performance Tcst, as well as thc aonual TVPM Test, was delayodduoto elwatoroperation issu€s. The Unit2
PM testing vas conplaed on April 9 aod tho rlsutb of tbos€ tosts will bo nrbmired prior to lvlay 9.
I am authorizod to make this srbndssion oobchalf of the ownsrs and opcrators for the affected sourcc oraffected
unite for which thc submission is mado. I ccrti$ udcr pcnalty of the law that I have pcrsonatty exminc4 and mfemiliu'vi[ thc statcmcnts and information submitr€d in ftis document and its auacheirts. Based m my inqu8
of thoee indivi&als with primary rcspmsibility for obtaining tho inform*ion, I cdti8r thd th€ stat€m€oE aod
information are to the best of my knowledgc ad bctisvc Eu€, acq[atr, and complao. I m awaro that there are
sipificantparalties for submiting falec statcmmts and information or omiting rcquircd statmcnB and
informatio, inchding the possibility of fne m imprisonmcor
Shouldyor have my qucstionsrcgadiag this report, ploaso do nothosiatc to call TerryGuthrie, Huntcr and
Envimnmental Mmager at 43 5-68743y or Tom Wiscomb at (801) 22G2373.
Huotington Plant
Encloancs: 'Sotuce Test Rcport for 2024 Conpliance Testing - Unit 1"
@i Tom lViscmb-NTOdo cnclorurr
Scarla Jacksm -NTO w/o cnclosur€
Rues Willsu. - Hutinglon Plmt Veaclosnc
UTAH DEPABTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL OUAUTY
l,r,:i ?3 ,:,,)\
DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
)
Managing Dircctor=
Source Test Repoft for 2O24 Compliance Testing
Unit 1
PacifiCorp
Huntington Power Plant
Huntington, Utah
Prepared For:
PacifiCorp
L4O7 W North Temple, Suite 210
Salt Lake City, Utah 84116
Prepared By:
Montrose Air Quality Services,
990 West 43rd Avenue
Denver, Colorado 80211
TITAH DEPAH|IMENT OF
EWIRONMENTAL OUATITY
APR ?,i, ii7ir
DIVISION OF AIR QUALITV
LLC
For Submission To:
Utah Division of Air Quality
195 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84116
Document Number: GPO43AS-O36878-RT- L557
Test Date: March L9, 2024
Submittal Date: April 19,2024
MT,}?N,I+g[H fthrffih-a
'*?#,?*
o ra
Review and Ceftification
All work, calculations, and other activities and tasks performed and presented in this
document were carried out by me or under my direction and supervision. I hereby certify
that, to the best of my knowledge, Montrose operated in conformance with the
requirements of the Montrose Quality Management System and ASTM D7036-04 during this
test project.
Date:
Title:
April4,2024
Name:David Smith Project Manager
I have reviewed, technically and editorially, details, calculations, results, conclusions, and
other appropriate written materials contained herein. I hereby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge, the presented material is authentic, accurate, and conforms to the requirements
of the Montrose Quality Management System and ASTM D7036-O4.
Signature:
Name:
April 4,2024
QA/QC Specialist
G P043AS-036878-RT- 1 557 Page 2 ot 70
ro
Table of Contents
1.0
2.0
3.0
Paqe
Introduction ............. .................. 5
1.1 Summary of Test Program .......5
1.2 KeyPersonnel..... ..................6
Plant and Sampling Location Descriptions...,......... ....... 8
2.L Process Description, Operation, and Control Equipment,.... .....,.8
2.2 Flue Gas Sampling Location .............,....8
2.3 Operating Conditions and Process Data...... .............8
Sampling and Analytical Procedures,.... ....,..,.,,.9
3.1 Test Methods..... ................... 9
3.1.1 EPA Method 3A......... ..............9
3.1.2 EPA Methods 5 and 2O2.. .....11
3.2 Process Test Methods..... .......12
4.0 Test Discussion and Results......... ...................13
4.1 Field Test Deviations and Exceptions.. ...,.13
4.2 Presentation of Results......... ,.......13
5.0 Internal QA/QC Activities ...... 13
5.1 QA/QC Audits .....,...........13
5.2 QA/QC Discussion. .....13
5.3 Quality Statement ........13
List of Appendices
Section
B
B.1
C
D
Field Data and Calculations.. ...........15
A.1 Sampling Locations.. ..........16
A.2 Particulate Matter Results and Data Sheets ............18
A.2.1 Unit 1....... ..........19
A.3 Example Calculations.....,..,.... ......,27
Facility Process Data....... ......31
Unit 1....... ........32
Laboratory Analysis Data ........ ......45
C.l Gravimetric Analyses .......46
Quality Assurance/Quality Control ..,..........51
D,1 Units and Abbreviations............ .............52
D.2 Manual Test Method QA/QC Data..... ...................60
D.3 Instrumental Test Method QA/QC Data., ......,............63
D.4 Accreditation Information/Certifications ......67
a/
GP043AS-036878-RT- 1 557
a a 'a ' '
Page 3 of 70
,,rii ,i; li,,i
'-i.rf.
O, il ...t
,,\ [i iaL.l r\ i l ' \ ii,[iV i(. lr: i,
List of Tables
Table 1-1 Summary of Test Pro9ram............. ................ 5
Table 1-2 Summary of Average Compliance Results ........ 6
Table 1-3 Test Perconnel and Observers........... .............7
Table 2-1 Sampling Locations........... ............ g
List of Figures
Figure 3-1 EPA Method 3 Sampltng Train........ ...............10
Figure 3-2 EPA Methods 5 and 202 Sampltng Tratn .,.......L2
Pa ciiiC. rp
2t24 CrIlrplranae Test Reprrt. Hurlinr:]lon P.wer Planl
GP043AS-036878-RT- 1 557 Page 4 of 70
rl
1.O Introduction
1.1 Summary of Test Program
PacifiCorp contracted Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC (Montrose) to perform a
compliance test program at Huntington Power Plant located near Huntington, Utah. The
tests are conducted to determine compliance with the applicable UDEQ permit.
The specific objectives were to:
. Perform annual Particulate Matter (PM) emissions testing on the exhaust
stacks of Unit 1 and Unit 2
. Perform diagnostic Condensable Particulate Matter (CPM) emissions testing on
the exhaust stacks of Unit 1 and Unit 2
. Conduct the test program with a focus on safety.
Montrose performed the tests to measure the emission parameters listed in Table 1-1.
Table 1-1
Summary of Test Program
To simplify this report, a list of Units and Abbreviations is included in Appendix D.1.
Throughout this report, chemical nomenclature, acronyms, and reporting units are not
defined. Please refer to the list for specific details.
This report presents the test results and supporting data, descriptions of the testing
procedures, descriptions of the facility and sampling locations, and a summary of the quality
assurance procedures used by Montrose. The average emission test results are summarized
and compared to their respective permit limits in Table 1-2. Detailed results for individual
test runs and all supporting data can be found in the appendices.
The testing was conducted by the Montrose personnel listed in Table 1-3. The tests were
conducted according to the test plan (protocol) that was submitted to and approved by
UDEQ.
Page 5 of 70G P043AS-036878-RT- 1 557
t I 'a : ',
rl
Table 1-2
Summary of Average Compliance Results
March 19,2024
A list of project participants is included below:
Facility fnformation
Source Location: PacifiCorp
Huntington Plant
8 Miles West of Huntington on Hwy 3l
Huntington, Utah 84528
Project Contact: Tom Wiscomb
Role: Sr. Environmental Advisor
Company: PacifiCorp
Telephone: [phone]
Email : [e-mail]
Agency Information
Regulatory Agency: Utah Depaftment of Air euality
Agency Contact: Rob Leishman
Telephone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Testing Company Information
Testing Firm: Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC
Contact: Craig Kormylo
Title: DistrictManager
Telephone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
' I I .t ,.. I
GP043AS-036878-RT- 1 ss7
Russell Willson
Senior Environmental Analyst
PacifiCorp
(43s) 687-433L
Russel l. Wi I lson @ PacifiCorp. com
a_
I . ''- I i-.. ,i:ia
Page 6 of 70
Particulate Matter (PM)
40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUUUU
Operating Permit 1501001004
*Note: The Unit 1 emission
presence of water droplets.
10. However, PM10 sampling cannot be on the stack due to the
The total PM concentration is used to show compliance with the PM10 limit
1.2 Key Personnel
ro
Test personnel and obselvers are summarized in Table 1-3.
Table 1-3
Test Personnel and Obselvers
Project Manager
Qualified Individual (QI)
Trailer operator
Test Coordinator
Plant Representative
.- tlr ,
' I I i_\ra .!-. :.a|f,i -irir-.lti.1,r,.,. ri,l
GP043AS-036878-RT-1557 PageT otTO
I 1l
2.O Plant and Sampling Location Descriptions
2.1 Process Description, Operation, and Control
Equipment
Huntington Power Plant comprises two pulverized coal-fired boilers.
2.2 Flue Gas Sampling Location
Information regarding the sampling location is presented in Table 2-1.
Table 2-1
Sampling Locations
Sample location(s) were verified in the field to conform to EPA Method 1. See Appendix A.1
for more information.
2.3 Operating Conditions and Process Data
Emission tests were performed while the source/units and air pollution control devices were
operating at the conditions required by the permit. The unit(s) were tested when operating
normally.
Plant personnel were responsible for establishing the test conditions and collecting all
applicable unit-operating data. The process data that was provided is presented in Appendix
B, Data collected includes the following parameters:
o Unit Load (MW)
o Relevant CEMS Parameters
'. lr ,.
,1 . I : .' t'
GP043AS-036878-RT- 1557
a at . r
Page 8 of 70
o ro
3,O Sampling and Analytical Procedures
3,1 Test Methods
The test methods for this test program have been presented in Table 1-1. Additional
information regarding specific applications or modifications to standard procedures is
presented below.
3.1.1 EPA Method 3A, Determination of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide
in Emissions from Stationary Sources (Instrumental Analyzer
Procedure)
EPA Method 3A is an instrumental test method used to measure the concentration of Oz and
COz in stack gas. The effluent gas is continuously or intermittently sampled and conveyed to
analyzers that measure the concentrations of Oz and COz. The performance requirements of
the method must be met to validate data.
Peftinent information regarding the peformance of the method is presented below:
o Method Options:
o Single-point sampling is performed if Oz and COz m€?surements are for
molecular weight calculations only
. Method Exceptions:
o Samples are collected in a Tedlar bag and analyzed on-site.
The typical sampling system is detailed in Figure 3-1.
a
l a I ri a :a .a -..
GP043AS-035878-RT- 1 557 Page 9 of 70
[' i."lr.,,o,
"., tt
Il"/ llr[: iiYLil-l: I
FIGURE 3.1
US EPA ITIETHOD 3 (TEDLAR BAG) SAITIPLING TRAIN
SOUEEZE BULB
hcrfiClr-trr
2124 Crnrpliance Test Reprrt. l-luniritqtrn Prwer Flani
GP043AS-036878-RT-1557 Page 10 of 70
o 10
3.1".2 EPA Methods 5 and 2O2
Determination of Particulate Matter from Stationary Sources and Dry
Impinger Method for Determining Condensable Particulate Emissions from
Stationary Sources
EPA Methods 5 and 2O2 are manual, isokinetic methods used to measure FPM and CPM
emissions. The methods are performed in conjunction with EPA Methods 1 through 4. The
stack gas is sampled through a nozzle, probe, heated filter, unheated CPM filter, condenser,
and impinger train. FPM is collected from the probe and heater filter. CPM is collected from
the unheated CPM filter and the impinger train. The samples are analyzed gravimetrically.
The sum of FPM and CPM represents TPM. The FPM, CPM, and TPM results are reported in
emission concentration and emission rate units.
Pertinent information regarding the performance of the method is presented below:
o Condensed water is measured gravimetrically
o The post-test nitrogen purge is performed by passing nitrogen through the
train under pressure
o To simplify shipping arrangements to remote locations, stainless steel
probe liners and nozzles are used, After each run, the nozzle and probe
liner are brushed and washed a total of six times with reagent-grade
acetone to assure complete recovery of all particulate matter. The brush is
given a final rinse with acetone and the nozzle and probe liner are given a
final rinse with acetone and all rinsate is collected into the appropriate
sample container
The typical sampling system is detailed in Figure 3-2.
aa
a , a . !i a- t I .a -
G P043AS-036878-RT- 1 557 Page 11 of 70
I rl
Figure 3-2
EPA Methods 5 and 2O2 Sampling Train
3.2 Process Test Methods
The test plan did not require that process samples be collected during this test program;
therefore, no process sample data are presented in this test report.
]HERMOCOUPLE
FILIER HOLDER r ITHERMOCOUPLE
TYPE'S'
PITOT
100 ml ILO
(modnsd, no tl!)ga'pty @lodled/ Ntb)
tnNtdtmtp)Slllca Gel
(mdltdlttotg)
THERMOCOUPLESJJ
BY.PASS VALVE(bTC,q VACUUM GAUGE
VALVE
6ffi.@d,
ta
a ta a
GP043AS-036878-RT-1557 Page 12 of 70
I ro
4.O Test Discussion and Results
4.L Field Test Deviations and Exceptions
Unit 2 was not operating during this mobilization and will be tested at a later date.
No further field deviations or exceptions from the test plan or test methods were identified
by the Project Manager.
4.2 Presentation of Results
The average results are compared to the permit limits in Table 1-2. Emissions are reported
in units consistent with those in the applicable regulations. Additional information is included
in the appendices as presented in the Table of Contents.
5.O Internal QA/QC Activities
5.1 QA/QC Audits
The meter box and sampling trains used during sampling performed within the requirements
of their respective methods. All post-test leak checks, minimum metered volumes, minimum
sample durations, and percent isokinetics met the applicable QA/QC criteria, except where
noted in Section 5.2.
EPA Method 5 analytical QA/QC results are included in the laboratory report. The method
QA/QC criteria were met, except if noted in Section 5.2. An EPA Method 5 reagent blank
was analyzed. The maximum allowable amount that can be subtracted is 0.001% of the
weight of the acetone used. The blank did not exceed the maximum residue allowed, except
where noted in Section 5.2.
EPA Method 202 analytical QA/QC results are included in the laboratory report, The method
QA/QC criteria were met, except where noted in Section 5.2. An EPA Method 202 Field Train
Recovery Blank (FTRB) was performed for each source category. The maximum allowable
amount that can be subtracted is 0.002 g (2.0 mg).
5.2 QA/QC Discussion
All QA/QC criteria were met during this test program.
5.3 Quality Statement
Montrose is qualified to conduct this test program and has established a quality
management system that led to accreditation with ASTM Standard D7036-04 (Standard
Practice for Competence of Air Emission Testing Bodies). Montrose pafticipates in annual
functional assessments for conformance with D7O36-04 which are conducted by the
American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA). All testing performed by Montrose
is supervised on site by at least one Qualified Individual (QI) as defined in D7036-04
Section 8.3.2. Data quality objectives for estimating measurement uncertainty within the
a / - t- a r a .a - ..
GP043AS-036878-RT-1557 Page 13 of 70
It-l
l-:r
ii l'r
documented limits !n the test methods are met by uslng approved test protocols for each
project as deflned in D7036-04 Sections 7.2.t and 12.10. Additlonal quality assurance
lnformatlon is included in the report appendices. The content of this report ls modeled after
the EPA Emisslon Measurement Center Guidellne Document (GD-043).
Pe cif iCo rp
21124 Crnrllrartce Test R.e1;ort HUntinlltail Prvver plant
L
GP043AS-036878-RT- 1 557 Page 14 of 70
o rl
Appendix A
Field Data and Calculations
GP043AS-036878-RT- 1 557 Page 15 of 70
a rl
Appendix A.1
Sampling Locations
!.
I / t . , ! O a a .l -
GP043AS-036878-RT- 1 557 Page 16 of 70
f,,,i ,l,l it'i: lt
ti i t,l. i.i-r.l r'l I il rr
gi ..., i1
li: il:'!/ l: ,i- l]r 1;
:i
PacifiCorp Huntington Power Plant Sampling Locations
Unlt
Diameter (D)
Upstrcam Distance (A)
Traverse Point 1
Traverse Point 2
Traverse Point 3
323.3" 32?,.7"
>220', >220',
t4,L' 14.L',47.3', 47.3',95.7" 95.5"
Downstream Distance (B) >266' >266'
Srmplc Point Dlrtrncs from Stack Wall
Particulate Matter Sampling Points
DH
Stack Cross Section (A-A)
Fa c rf rCr r-1;
ll2,{ Crrrplrarrce Tesl lR.epoit. HuntnUtrn Frtryer Plant
GP043AS-036878-Rr- 1557 Page L7 ot 7O
o lt
Appendix A.2
Particulate Matter Results and Data Sheets
! : ..t ,
).:l -l r- r.,? ar ,:rl; . .. i-rt..tr I I
GP043AS-036878-RT-1557 Page 18 of 70
t ro
Appendix A.2.1
Unit 1
| . a r a 'a - '
GP043AS-036878-RT-1557 Page 19 of 70
PRol{36' t
PadfCorp
Hundnttd Unlt 1
{le1202.ffr MUN I RUSL
Vr Volume ofwat!. Condensed (mL)
vn voluee ofstack Gas Collected lda0
Y MeterC.llbrationf.dor(unttle$)
AH Prcssur. Oifferenti.l Ac.o$ Orificc ("HrO)
Tn Temperatlra atGas Meter ('F)
Cakul.doB
P. Absolute Pressure at Gas Meter ("Ht)
T. Absolute Tempe..tore at Gas Mder ('R)
Vq*) Volume ofW.ter Cond€nsed (scf)
Vdo Samplecasvolume(d$o
8.,* Obseryed Stack cas Moisture Content (96/100)
B*,., Saturated Moisture Content (%/lml
S- Moiiure Content Us.d (%/100)
3
14:30
16:4s
120
32!.3 32t.3
2?.19 Zr.8
4.2 L2
0.84 0.84
0.8649 0.86n
110 U0
570.084 sm.g
{.31 {.31
30.16 30.13
28.85 2A.a2
23.48 23,48
570 570
57.0 5r.t
75,836,864 76,trr,5$
L,263,94A t\69,5A
22r.9
tto.247
0.990s
2.2
74
23.9s
534
10.44
86.m
0.108
0.111
0.1m
2L5
109.317
0.s005
2.2
7l
23.95
931,0
10.5,
t6.13
0.109
0.110
0.iff
0.245 0.245
4.7 6.3
14.6 r9.0
0.4 0.4
5.5 4.5
2.1 2.3
7.6 6.9
2.O 2.0
5.6 4,9
1840 l8ilo
1.27E4 3.27E{a
99.3 98.5
18.9 25.0
0.003 0.8
4.82E-O7 6.39E-07
36.6 4.4
466 475
0.08 0,10
0.008 0.010
150.2 211,5
0.001 0.001
1.43E{7 LEaO
10.8 9.5
0.002 0.002
47-S 41.5
o.ru 0,005
5.25E47 7,6,,E4'
41.4 58.2
s5 175
0.10 0.12
0.010 0,013
207.7 255.0
Run I
Sbd Tlm.
Sbp Tlm.
$mpleTln. (nln.l
2
l2t02
14r10
120
323.3
23.79
4.2
0.84
0,8586
110
570.084
{.31
30.03
2A.70
23.48
570
55.7
75,249,|m
1,254,tsz
238
109.081
0.9905
2.1
73
23.*
533
7L20
85.62
0.116
o.111
0.111
o.245
6.5
18.8
0.4
4.9
2.6
7.5
2.O
5.5
18,10
3.27E-O4
99.1
24.9
0.004
6.41E{7
4.2
&
0.10
0.011
211.3
0.001
1.42E-O7
10.7
0.m2
46.7
0.m5
7.83E{7
58.9
480
0.L2
0.014
2S8.0
1
8:56
11:08
120
EPAM.dbd2D.b L 2 ! a@t.
tnpuB
0. SE(kDiameter(inches)
P* Barometric Pressure {"Hg}
P. Stackstatic Pre$ore ("HrO)
q p[otTube Co.fficient (unitless]
VAp{ Avg. V€locity Head ofStackGai V("HIO)
T,
323.3
23.79
-4.2
0.84
0.8801
10!,
s70.0u
{.31
30.19
24.92
23.48
569
57.9
77,&7,0&
,"290,785
214.O
108.624
0.990s
2.2
56
23.95
s26
10.07
45.42
0.104
0.107
0.ls
0.245
7.8
23.6
0.3
3.4
2.1
s.s
2.0
3.5
1840
3.27E44
97.2
31.1
0.006
7.93E47
61.4
480
0.13
0.012
269.1
0.m1
8.93E-08
5.9
0.001
30.3
0.m5
8.83E{7
68.4
rl80
0.14
0.014
299.4
ShckGas TempeEtu.e l'F)
Caldlatlont
A SbckArea (ftz)
P. Sbck Static Pressure ('Hg)
Md S€cl Gas Mol.cular Welght, dry basi5 (lbllb-mole)
M' Stack Ges Mol.cular Weight, wet basts (lb/lb-mol.l
P, Absolute Stack Pre$uc ("H8)
Tg.q Absolute Stack Gas TEmperature ('R )
V, Stack G.s Vdelw {fv*cl
Q StackG.s Dryvolumetric Flow Rate (dscf/hr)
Q Stack Gas DryVolumetrl. Flow Rate (d*f/mtnl
uluentD* 1 2 3 awrata
Oz (Xvd) 7 .g a,7 8.0 &2
CO, (%vd) 11.7 lo.s 11.S tt.2
D.
c1
c2
Nozle diameter (")
Ma$ ofPM colleded on filter{mf)
l{ass ot Plil collected ln ilnse (n8)
Massof a.etone blank (n8)
Mass of lnorganic Condensible PM (mg)
Mass ofOryanlc Condensible PM (m8)
Total CPM Mei. (mg)
Mass oftrain blank (mtl
Tobl CPM Massle$ Bla6k (m8)
€hlslon Cal@hdon.
Fuel F-F.ctor (scflmmBtu)
Crcs$sadlonel araa ofnozle (Itr)
lskinetic variation (%)
Total Filterable PM mass less blank (mg)
Fllterebla Panbulate concentratlon {gr/dsco
Filte6ble Particul.te concentration (lb/dscf)
Filtenbh Paniculate ma$ emi$ion Ete (lb/hr)
Boller Load (MW)
Fllterable Paniculate ma$ emision ht! {lb/Mw-hr}
Filte6ble Pafriculate ma$ emission rate (lb/mmBtu)
EPA Mdhod 202 D.t. t 2 3 Av.r.!.
tnpd
I
q
q
q
q
A76ohtslyt Fllterable Partlculate mass emlssion r.te (tons/yearl
Condensible Particulate concentratlon (grldsao
Co.densible Paticulate concenhtion llb/dsfl
Eru' Condensible Perticulate mass emissaon rate (lblhr)
Condenslble Paticulat. mass emi$ion Ete (lb/mmBtu)
87Oh6/f Condensible Paniaulate mass efrission rate (tons/year)
Total Pafrhulat. concentBtlon l8r/dsco
Total Pafticulate concentration (lb/d$fl
Total Partiaulate massemission rate (lb/hr)
tuiler Load (MW)
Total Padiculate mass emission rate (lb/Mw-hr)
Total Pati.ulete msr emission rate {lb/mmBtu)
Total Padiculate ma$ emisslon rate (tons/vear)
GP043AS-036878-RT- 1 557 Page 20 of 70
E? A rlrr5/LoUrd,u:to.t'il *lr-l
rr!.hlto AnfifmP,'f 5
ilnhlt LS.?9 u.arin*o N/o3/l.7t2t= 'l,(,at -!_;jF
o,oc crrtD0+tl!lU!!!r€41.#D-
-Cll.dEY
ntbHrrn, rr }h 2l-&t- il. &ql*o -[-]
03/ {r/ l{ P',q.d, Pt0.1- 0 3 (6 a
-e'ft
$.?1'
A,1\ MONTROSEUJt elt et auillrvrctt
elA * rlr,, ardtl..trrerrrt h.-oa-
o^rac chGfdpgslUrtlra,rltlt$-m.q- Ep.dl*r
-clror-
By-rar L&
-.q.2 &*rr.n+r
,"n, l3.:}2--R-.gmr*D
PrEldt egqa: Pl!t-?-t
OnXrO
O tr HzO
carEH,cp ' f 1
rrmt.H YF.
@1A!.OlFll"zE
Page 23 of 70
ld..rtlficdon
Thcrnanrbr
fF.ft
lD/SrmploLoc$nJ-opcrm IJJ-f \,Iughb c\rv
0d t$gNrt?,p"t tdrod 3rmplo Rrcowry t Cr[brdon GNrcl
Dthh..t l*
}Iro tdtr(Fhld brLnc. ilirtba u,Urh ote.dohrd( wdom trlrr)
Dd. Wtj ,),.s..thrtrtrc.,g Stt, A t/r/
Fcdunccrnll,; rrT{f
-
a
corld0ol. ltoblhL.b)
humldU, !,9
.F
bb* T-
E
'ill
6 (Utlrloc}oaff,rra rU uo mitlllsnitt3OJIL s1 ?,2t1-1 m
nol Dll Illdl
ldhmdil
2dtsnrhlt
Awr{D
Avuago
Avmgr
D2
D2
B Ct.2t5
o3
3dlrmFa _Dl
LblJ trSn]! trrllr O hconrl
E lk€dcd O r/Ydr.oooLd
tr tsd E/7dh1 o otrcr
./ryp. ll trllu tr udrrod
Llrr oqltfi oCls
o othc
O dr.r
Hrh o qurullbc dry'llloO B Tdlon O Tdlon/qulrE .tr drq
^-Nurbc
^un','
106'l *** \ 0 15 ^*", I 61T-*-
lnlblttrdon
H.lt o qu.rtznbr tr ghr.[b.r B Tcllql ct Tdlm&uart B cdrt
OA/OC Ch.dc
Ch.d<cdhf
Conpbbnct! lrglilW_ Acancy_ Sp.dtladont
Drh Curtodrn:0014s{Ms#1f230
GP043AS-036878-RT- 1 557 Page 24 of 70
ltfirmelo E rtltloruon
ruld*PRo.l T?r.rrmmcbr
/FrdU
thlt lDrSrmCs Lmdar Bdan6 (){&,
Op.rru hbEhn cw
r 0,|3.CPR-
0d *[QIlIlp"[E Plec ot
lnlbmdor
Hrn n$nrtttb.rtrgh..tlb.r tr Tsion OTcnon/qurrE trohcr
Nrfirb€r: Runl:_ Run2: _Run3: _ Run
Hdt Bquartfibcr trghlrf,b.r O Tdlon trTdlon&ErE trdrc
001As{M8+ttr230
tdrod Sempb Rccorry & Cdlbrdon Chrcl
D.trrh.ct
Aff.(ruL b*ncr rtrtb tfrrh o.ft
Deb
mt!.)Conddom (Iob0. L.b)
huridlty, %
€hnd.dnr.s.g
Flcld ldencc r0ar, g
.F
lsil T-
aly wo ma.alrunfil! muat ml ba moll
t dhmstE Ol _02 _Ds _Awrace
2dhtri,t _Dl D2 _Ixl_A\,.r.9.
dh.nrF! B,l _O2 _Dlt_Avcraec
x.a61 Oqrltr trCrit tr{!.| tr tiEnlum O Incond trdtcr
lyp. o hxtd tr.u{ra$d o lir.oooLd tr u,at.-ooobd o dlcr
Uer Oerrtz aC.l! tr.brl o Tdlon tr o&.r
ldlollndon
Lotttrrt t
GP043AS-036878-RT- 1 557
DaE CLBtodhn:
Actrlllcr_ Sp.dncdonr
Page 25 of 70
d0 t*gN,I*g[H EPA XeOrcd 202 Purye lnfonnatlon Pase I "/T-
Prqf€dr o1b
'
lD/Samplc Locatbn UA: t
Irlcntficaton/yl
lle lDs
Run I
sreilTlmo: lL:20
Elapoed
Tlme mln
Nltogcn
Fbu, Rlb
t,PM
CPM Flbr
EfrTcmp.F
lmplngar
BdtTanp
OF
0 6 -7cs DLI
15 l'.7o oi
30 fo,Jo Q5
15 l*!1t 6b
EO lr 7r oo
SbpTlmc: l\',? I
lYfrraddcd brpurgc? Ytr u Btl
Run q
Sta,tTlme: lbl', 5 (/
Ntuogon
FlowRab
tPM
CPM Fllbr
BdtTemp.F
lmdng€r
EdtTemp
OF
Iel a50 GO
T b8 oz
I.75 bJ
ilry 1a b5
e 1',-05
SbpTlme: t5,,5C)
/tiralerartdedftrpryc? Dd Ntr
Run
SttailTImo:
Mfogon
FhRaE
LPM
CPMFIh
EdTernp
OF
lmffiger
EfiTemp
NF
SbpTlme:
Mabraddedbrpu]!B? Ytr Ntr
Run
Sbtt'nmo:
MfoSsr
FlilRato
tPM
CPM Flltsr
EdtTqlD.F
lmdryor
EdtTenrp
OF
SopTlme:
/Vatraddedhrpurye? Ytr N tr
Was mbr sdd€d b dropout lmphqpr
puEe: dlod(yes orno
lf wabrms added, lnputamounton
Reoovsry Shee[ br [llohfrr'€
00lAs4M$FrL220
Flow mebr rangc must bc at loast 14
CPM Fmor Edt bmp must be
65 {!i'F
lmplngu E dt bmp must be <88'F
EitUnp ls not r€qulr€d f
Yre(g w€lgh€d prlor b purCe
addedlbrpuDe? Ytr N tr
QA/QCChed<:Complebnese _
Ched<ed by:
l€Slblll$_ Amrracy_ Speclficatons_
Dafta Cuslodlan:00rAsoM$FM-227
Page 26 of 70GP043AS-036878-RT- 1 5 57
Appendix A.3
Example Calculations
PROJ-036878
Pacificorp
Huntln8ton Unit 1
Run #l Sample Calculations
EPA Method 5: Determination of Particulate Matter Emissions (flt CFR part EO, Appendix A-11
/av\tu|\)lt$ti\lsli
Variable Value )eflnltlon Unlt of Measurement
D5 323.3 ;tack Diameter i nches
A 570.08 :ross-Sectional Area of the Stack ft2
P -4.20 ;tack Static Pressure in. H20
P -0.31 itack Static Pressure in. Hg
%co2 rL.7 :oncentration of Carbon Dioxide Dry Volume Percent (%vd)
%Qz 7.9 :oncentration of Oxygen Dry Volume Percent (%vd)
Md 30.19 )ry Molecular Weight of the Stack Gas (default)lbllb-mole
Pt.,23.79 larometric Pressure in. Hg
AH 2.20 ,ressure Differential across Orifice in. H2O
Pm 23.9s \bsolute Pressure at Gas Meter in.Hg
tm 65 femperature at Gas Meter "F
T-526 Absolute Temperature at Gas Meter .R
K1 0.04706 Conversion Factor ft'lmL
2L4.0 Volume of Water Condensed c
10.07 y'olume of Water Condensed scf
K4 L7.64 :onstant "R/in.Hc
0.9905 Meter Calibration Factor Unitless
108.624 y'olume of Stack Gas Collected dcf
86.423 ;ample Gas Volume dscf
B*,0.104 itack Gas Moisture Content %1100
M.28.92 \ctual Molecular Weight of the Stack Gas lb/lb-mole
P,23.48 \bsolute Stack Pressure in. Hg
T5 109 \verage Stack Temperature I
T s69 Verage Absolute Stack Temperature .R
Kp 85.49 :onversion Factor (ft/sec) x v(((lbllb-mole)(in.Hg))/(("R)(in.Hro)))
ce 0.84 ,itot Coefficient Dimensionless
AveYAp 0.8801 Nerage Square Root of Velocity Head Readings in. H2O
57.85 \verage Stack Gas Velocity ft/sec
T,u s28 itandard Absolute Temperature .R
P*a 29.92 ;tandard Absolute Pressure in. Hg
o 77,447,080 )rv Volumetric Flow Rate Corrected to Standard Conditions dscf/hr
D"0.245 {ozzle Diameter inches
3.27E-04 :ross-Sectional Area of the Nozzle tt'
m.34.60 total PM and CPM Mass mg
q 8.83E-07 ,articulate Concentration lb/dscf
64.4 ,M Mass Emission Rate pounds per hour
t 1840 LFactor from EPA Method 19 scflmmBtu
Erb/mmBtu 0.014 ,M Mass Emission Rate pounds per million Btu
Etonslvr 299.4 ,M Mass Emission Rate tons per vear
K5 0.094s ionstant (in.Hg. min) / ('R.sec)
e t20 iample Time minutes
97.2%sokinetic variation percent
GP043AS-036878-RT- 1 557 Page 28 of 70
PROr-035878
Pacificorp
Huntlngton Unlt I
Run fl Sample Calculations
EPA Method 5: Determination of Particulate Matter Emissions (4{l CFR Part 60, Appendix A-1}
A= 1r(DJ74l2
n1323.31241^2
= 570.08 ft^2
\= pJlt.a
= 4.2h3.6
= -0.31in. Ht
Mo = (0.114 x %co2) + (0.32 x %orl + 0.281100-%co2-o/oo2l
= (0.rt4 x 11.7) + (0.32 x 7.9) + 0.28(100 - Lt.1 -7.91
= 30.19lb/lb-mole
P.= Pu*+(AH/13.6)
= 23.79 + 12.2h3.51
= 23.95 in. Ht
T'= 460+t.
= 450+55
=526R
Vsqsl: K1xV6
= 0.04705 x 214
= 10.07 scf (Eq. 4-1)
Vm(ot=KaxYxVnxPm
Tm
=17.64 x 0.9905 x 108.624 x 23.95
576
= 86.42 dscf
Bs= v
Vwdnd) + Vft(std)
= rO.O7
10.07 + 86.42
= 0.10a (x/l(x)l
M.= Mox (1-B*") + (18.0x Bws)
1sq. a-a)
= (0.44 x 11.7) + (0.32 x 7.91 + 0.28(100 -
= 2t.92lb/lb-mole
P,= Pb.r + Pg
= 23.79 + C0.31)
= 23.tl8ln. Ht
Te*r= 460+T"
= 460 + 109
=569R
11.7 - 7.9) x (1 - 0.104) + (18.0x 0.104)
(8q.2-6)
6rr $!lN l, \.tlll
(Eq.4-3)
G P04 3AS-036878 - RT- 1 5 5 7 Page 29 of 70
PROJ-Oit6878
PaclfiCorp
Huntln$on Unlt 1
Run *1 Sample Cak{lrtloni
EPA M.thod 5: Detcrmlnation of Partlculate M.ttcr Eml3slons (40 CFR psrt 60, Apprndix A-U
(Eq.2-7)
(T,u x PJ
(T.f"urt x P*a)
(528 x 23./t8l
(569 x 29.92)
(8q.2-8)
mnq=
E-
v. = Kpx CpxAvgvApx \ (p,x MJ
= 85.49 x 0.84 x 0.8801x
= 57.9ft/sec
Q = 36oo x (1-s*) x (v.) x (A) x
= 3600 x (1 - 0.104) x (s7.85)x (570.08) x
= 7?,4E'l,g8/Jds.ilht
A = r(0,/z+)r
ftla.245l}4l^2
= 3.27E-{Xft^2
(mg/e) (e/lb) (v.ra)l
34.6
(10001 (4s3.ss2) (86.4231
= 8.83E.07 lbldscf
Errh,- qxq
= 8.83E{7 x 77447080
= 68.a lb/hr
Erymu=qxFcx100
(COr%vd)
= 0.014|b/mmBtu
E5"7r= Errn. x(Hrs/yr)
(lbs/ton)
= 68.36x8,760
2000
= 299,4tons/year
K5xT"hb,)xV.r#tx100
P.1.51 x V.x A" x € x (1-B*o)
0.0945 x 559 x 86.423 x 10O
23.tl8 x 57.85 x 3.3E{4x 120 x (1 - 0.104)
= 97.2%
GP043AS-036878-RT-1 557
(Ee. s-7)
Page 30 of 70
Appendix B
Facility Process Data
Appendix 8.1
Unit 1
Sorrce
03l1Sn1 08:56
Average Data - Run 1
Plant: HUNTINGTON PI-ANT
lnterval: 1 Minute
Type: Block
Report Period: 03/192024 08:56 Through OA19|2O24 11:OB
23.753 1.4 107.53 474
Time Online Criteria: 1 minute(s)
UNIT,I
BARPRESS
IINHG}
co2
/PCTI
OPACITY
IpcT'l
STICEMP
TDEGFT
UNITLOAD
(tn n
0U1Sn1 08:57 23.753 4741.410.2 107.17
O3l19D1 08:58 23.752
Osngn1 08:59 23.752 '10.3 1.4 106.87 482
OA19n1 Og:0O 23.752
03119124 09:01 23.752 10.4 't.4 107.01 490
Og19n1 O9:O2 23.752
Ogl19l24 09:03 23.751 10.5 1.4 1W.1'l 494
O3l19i24 08:(X 23.752 r0.5 107.13
Og19n4 09:05 23.751 10.5 4911.4 107.03
03119124 O9:Oo 23.751 10.5 1.4 107.05 488
O3l19m 00:07 23.751 10.5 1.4 107.53 482
OA1g21 00:08 23.751 1.110.5 107.09
Og1Sl24 09:09 23.751 1.410.4 107.40 473
Ogl1gl24 09:10 23.752 1.110.4 107_68
O3ngn4 09:11 23.752 10.3 4711.4 107.74
O3t1Sl21 09:'12 23.752 1.110.2 107.77
Og19n4 09:13 23.752 10.2 1.4 107 _71 475
OU19n4 09:14 23.752 1.1 r07.33 479
O3l19n4 09:15 23.752 10,2 1.4 106.92 152
03119124 G):16 23.753 10.3 1.4 104.72 485
03119n4 09:17 ?.3.752 4871.110.3
OU1Sa4 09:18 23.752 10.4 1.1 107.55 486
03119124 09:19 23.752 1.410.4 107.38 483
03/19n4 09:20 23.752 4751.510.4 1o7.u
og19n1 09,.21 t_5 107-3/t
03l1ffl4 09:22 23.752 4761.510.3 107.22
$119n4 09:23 23.751 4771.510.3 107.26
o3t1sl21 09:21 23.752 1.410.3 107.5 479
O3l19n4 00:25 1.110.3 107.58 482
03115124 09:28 23.751 1.410.3 107.58 4U
oil19n1 09..27 10.3 1.1 107.41 484
Og19n4 09:28 23.7fi 1.410.3 107.33 483
Ogl19l24 09:29 23.750 10.3 1.4 107.48 181
Ogt19l24 09:30 23.750 1.510.3 107.50 179
O3l1Sl21 09:31 1.110.3 107.23 477
OU19l24 09:32 23.750 1.410.3 107.O2 475
OSl19,l21 09:38 23.750 1.1 47510.3 '107.40
Page 33 of 70
F = UnIl (,Illtno
E = Exceedance
M = Maintenance
T = Out Of Control
Report Generatedl. O4|OSl24 72:35
GP043AS-036878-RT- 1 5 5 7
C = Calibration
S = Substituted
* = Suspect
03t19t24
Average Data - Run 1
Plant: HUNTINGTON PLANT
lnterval: 1 Minute
Type: Block
Report Period : 031 1 I I 2024 08 : 56 Th rou g h 031 1 9 I 2024 1 1 :08
Time Online Criteria: 1 minute(s)
23.749 '10.3 1.1 107.94
o3t19t24 09:35 '10.3 1.4 108.30 476
o3l1st24 09:36 23.749 10.3 't.4 108.23 478
03t19t24 09:37 23.749 10.3 1.4 107.89 482
o3t19124 09:38 23.748 10_3 1.4 107.47 485
03t19t24 09:39 23.744 10.4 1.4 107.09 486
09:40o3t19t24 23.748 10.4 1.5 483
o3t19t24 23.748 'to.4 1.6 107.3"1
03t19124 09:42 23.748 10.3 1.5 107.51 480
03t19t24 23.748 107.55
03t19t24 09:44 25.744 48210.3 '1.5 't07.76
03119t24 09:45 23.747 10.3 1.5 1 07.93 485
o3119t24 09:47 23.747 1.4
o3l1sl24 23.747 1.4 108.31
23.747 10.3 1.4 108.24 481
10.3
o3119t24 09:49
03t19t24 '10.3 108.00
o3119t24 09:51 23.747 10.3 1.4 107.80 475
oa19t24 23.746 10.3 't.4 107.86 474
03t19t24 09:53
o3t'tsl24 23.746 10.3 '1.4 108.91 476
031't9t24 09:55 1.410.3 '108.80
o3t19t24 09:56
osh9t24 09:58 23.745
03t
03t19t24 10:00 23.745 .t0.3 1.4 108.82 41
o3t19t24 10:01 23.744 10.3 1.4 108.88
o3t19t24 10:02 23.744 10.3 1.4 108.78 482
'10:03
o3119t24 10:04 23.743 10.3 1.4 .t 08.95 4a1
o3t19t24 23.743 '10.3 1.4 109.21 47s
o3t19124 10:06 23.743 t0.3 109.00 479
o3t19124 23.743 1.4 108.48
03119124 10:08 23.743 1.4 108.68
o3t19t24 23.743 10.3 t09.04
Ogl19l24 10:10
03t19t24
23.743 10.3 1.4 109.30 478
10.3 109.32
o3119124 10:12
03119124 10:14 23.742
F = Unit Offline
E = Exceedance
M = Maintenance
T = Out Of Control
Report Generated: O4/O5124 12:35
GP043AS-036878-RT-1557
C = Calibration
S = Substituted
* = Suspect
Page 34 of 70
03119t24 10:15
Average Data - Run 1
Plant: HUNTINGTON PLANT
lnterval: 1 Minute
Type: Block
Report Peri od : 03 I 1 I I 2024 08: 56 Th roug h O3l 1 9 I 2024 1 1 :08
Time Online Criteria: 1 minute(s)
23.741 10.3 1.4 I 09.14 477
o3t19124 '10:16 23.742 10.3 1.5 't09_14
03119124 10:17 23.742 10.3 109.23 473
o3t19t24 10:18 23.741 10.2 1.5 1 09.1 0
03119124 10:19 23.741 10.2 109.17 474
o3t19t24 10:20 23.742 10.2 1.5
03119124 10:21 23.742 1.5 109.42 479
03115124 'lO:22 25.742 10.2 1.4 109.73
03t19t24 'lO:23 23.742 48310.2 't.4 1og.71
03119124 10:24 23.742 10.3 4821.4 109.31
o3t19124 '10:25 23.742 10.3 1.4 109.02
03t19124 23.742 10.3 4811.4 108.96
03t19t24 lO:27 23.742 10.4 1.4 109.20 479
03t19t21 10.4 l4 109.58
o3l't9t24 1.4't0.310:29 23.741 109.49
03t19t24 1.4'10:30 109.08 475
03t19t24 1.410.310:31 23.740 109.13
03t't9124 1O:32 23.740 1.410.3 109.83 475
o3119t24 23.740 10.3 1.4 109.76
o3t19t24 10:34 23.740 10.3 4771.4 109.76
03119124 10:3s 23.739 10.3 1.4 109.50
109.341.410.3o3t1912423.735
03t't9t24 10:37 23.738 10.3 4811.5 '109.31
o3t19124 10:38 23.738 10.4 '1.5 109.20
o3t19t24 1.510:39 23.737 109.23 4A'l
o3t19t24 23.737 10.4 1.5 109.50
03119124 10:41 23.737 1.4 109.60 442
03t19124 10i42 23.736 1.410.5
o3t19124 10:43 23.736 1.4 109.36 484
o3l't9t24 23.735 1.410.5 109.26
o3t19t24 10:45 23.7U 1.4 109.44 487
o3119t24 10:46 23.7U 10.5 1.4 109.40
03119124 10:47 23.735 4911.4
03t19t24 10:48 23.7U 10.5 1.4 109.59
o1t't9t24 1.410:49 109.84 489
o3t19t24 t0:50 23.734 l410.6 109.71
o3t't9124 10.6 1.4 109.59 €3
03t19t24 l0:52 23.733 10.5 14
o3t19124 10.5 4811.4 109.69
03t19t24 10:54 23.733 1.410.5 109.99
Page 35 of 70
03t19t24 23.732 1.4 477
F = Unit Offline
E = Exceedance
M = Maintenance
T = Out Of Control
Report Generated: 04/ 05 / 24 12:35
GP043AS-036878-RT-1557
C = Calibration
S = Substituted
* = Suspect
03t19t24
Average Data - Run 1
Plant: HUNTINGTON PLANT
lnterval: 1 Minute
Iype: Block
Report Period: 0311912024 08:56 Through 03t19t202411:OB
Time Online Criteria: 1 minute(s)23.732 10.4 1.4 109.89
10:57
'10:58
23.731
23.731
1.5 .109.70 476
1.4
03t19t24 10:59 23.731 1.4 qs
1 1:00 23.730
'11:oz 23.729
1
o3l19n1 1 1:04
o3t19t24
03t19t24 I l:08
A\rerage
Minimum
Maximum
Summation
Geometric Mean
lncluded Data Points
Total number of Data
Pdate
23.743
23.724
23.753
3,157.883
10.3
10.2
10.6
1,375.8
1.4
1.4
1.6
188.9
C = Calibration
5 = Substituted
* = Suspect
108.55
1@.72
1 10.15
14,43tt.56
480
471
494
63,839
133
'133
133
'133
133
13!t
138
133
133
133
F = Unit Offline
E = Exceedance
M = Maintenance
T = Out Of Control
Report Generatedl. 04/05 /24 72:35
G P043AS-036878-RT- 1 5 57 Page 36 of 70
Sorce
OU1S|24 '12:02
Average Data - Run 2
P|ant: HUNTINGTON PISNT
lnterval: 1 Minute
Type: Block
Report Period : O3l 19 I 2024 1 2: 02 Th roug h O3l 1 9 I 2024' 1 4: 1 O
25.716 10.4 I '1.5 110.52
Time Online Criteria: 1 minute(s)
UNITl
EARPRESS
(rNHG)
co2
(PCT)
OPACITY
(PCr)
s'I KI EMH
(DEGF)
UNII LL,AU(rw
ou19t21 12..05 23.715 I 10.86 476
03119n4 12:U 23_715 1.4 r 10.84
o3119ru 12:05 23.7',t4 4791O-/t 110.8't
O3l1gl24 12:@ 23.711 11o.a2 $1
og1gl24 12:07 23.714 10.4 110.61 /[83
03119124 12108 23.713 1.4 110.70
03119n1 12:09 23.7'.t3 48210.4 1 1 0.6!t
0(//19124 12:10 23.711 1.4 110./18 ta1
O3l1gl24 12:11 23.713 1.4r0.4 110.17
Ogl19l21 12:12 23_711 1.4 1'10.52 479
03115124 12i13 23_713 1.110.4 110.47 tao
OA19n4 12:14 1.423.713 1 I 0./t6 81
o3t'19t21 12..15 ?.3.712 10.4 1.4 110.82
03,19ru 12:.16 23.712 1.4 110.78 483
03119121 12:17 23.712 10.4 1.4 110.77 482
VJl19n4 12:18 23.712 1.410.4 'l lO.5rl 482
03119124 12:19 23.712 1.110.4 110.24 ta3
O3hSn4 12:20 23.712 10.4 1.5 110.49
03119n4 12:21 23.712 ,.5 110.26 479
OSl1Sl24 12:22 23.711 10.4 1.6 1 10.39
O3l1gl21 12:23 23.711 1.5 110.88 479
03119124 12'.21 23.711 10.4 1.4 111.1'l
OSngnl 12:25 23.710 4811.4 111.O2
23.711 10.3 1.4 111.22
03l1Sn4 12127 23.710 1.4 1 1 1.30 479
03ngn1 12:28 23.709 t0.3 1.4 111.12
O3l19lZ4 '12:29 23.708 1 10.91 471
Ogl19l21 12:30 23.708 10.2 1.4 110.95
OA19l24 12i31 23.707 10.2 110.93 473
03119124 12:32 23.707 1.410.2 11o.a2
03119124 12:33 4741.4 1 10.52
OA19n4 12:34 23.705 1.410.3 1 10.55
Ogl19l24 12:35 23.705 1.4 I 10.68 474
03l'19124 12:36 23.705 1.410.3 1 10.58
OU19n4 12137 1.4 110.37 177
OU1S|24 12138 23.705 1.4 47810.3 1 1 0..18
Page 37 of 70
03119124 12:39 23.705
E = Exceedance
M = Maintenance
T = Out Of Control
Report Generated: 04 / OS / 24 L2:36
GP043AS-036878-RT-1 557
1.1 481
C = Calibration
S = Substituted
* = Suspect
03t'19t24 12:4O
Average Data - Run 2
Plant: HUNTINGTON PLANT
lnterval: 1 Minute
Type: Block
Report Period: 031 1912024 1 2:02 Through 03t 19t2024 1 4:10
Time Online Criteria: 1 minute(s)
23.705 10.3 1.4 1 10.16 4W
o3t19t24 12:41 23.74!,!0.3 1.5 110.35
o3t't9t24 12:42 23.7U 1.4 1 t0_58 484
03t19t24 23.7U 1.4 1 10.55 482
03t19t24 t2'.44 23.704 10.3 1.4 1'10.5't
o3t19t24 23.705 1.4 110.42 478
o3t19124 12:46 23.704 1.4 1 1 0.30
10.4 1.4 110.25 490
10.4 110.28
10.4
03t19t24
03t19t24
23.7U
ost't9124 12:49 23.703 1.4 110.29 488
03t19t24 12:5O 23.703 1 10.31
29;02 10.4 M 1fi.a2 ----*-70---
481
03119t24 '12:52
o3t19124 12:54 23.702 10.3 1.4 110.6rt 475
o3t'tsl24 12:55 23_701 10.3 1.4 110.40
o3t19t24 12156 23.701 1.4 '110.5'l 475
03t19t24 '12i57 23.701 10.3 1.4 110.28
o1t19t24 12:58
1 2:59
23.700
23.700
10.3 1.4 110.40
o3t19124 13:00 23.700 10.3 1.4 1't0.62 442
03t19t24 13:01 23.699 1.5 110.76 480
o3t19t24 l3'.o2 110.87
23.698 10.3 1.4 .110.94 468
10.3
03119124 13:03
o3t't9t24 l3:04 23.698 10.3 1.5 111.17
o3119t24 13:05
o3119t24
23.697
23.698
'1o.3 1.5 't11.52
o3t19124 13:07 23.697 10.2 1.5 't I 1.61 442
03t19124 23.696 10.3 1.5 11 1.05
o3119124 13:09 23.696 10.3 I .4 1 'l 1.00 488
03t'tsl24 23.696 1',t1.41
23.695
o3t19t24 13:'13 23.695
o3t'19124 'l.3:14 23.694
o3t't9t24
o3t19t24
23.694 111.31 480
o3t19124 13:17
o3t19t24 13:19 23.693
03119t24 23.492
F = Unit Offline
E = Exceedance
M = Maintenance
T = Out Of Control
Report Generated: O4/O5/24 72:36
GP043AS-036878-RT-1557
G = Calibration
S = Substituted
* = Suspect
Page 38 of 70
o3119t24 13:21
Average Data - Run 2
Plant: HUNTINGTON PLANT
lnterval: 1 Minute
Type: Block
Report Period: 031191202412:02 Through 0311912024 14:10
Time Online Criteria: I minute(s)
23.692 10.3 1.4 1'10.90 4U
o3t't9t24 13:22 23.692 10.3 1.4 110.85 485
o3119t24 13'.23 23.69't 10.3 1.4 't't0.60
o3t19t24 13:24 23.690 1.410.3 110.32 484
o1t1sl24 13:25 23.689 1.410.3 1 10.31
o3t19124 13:26 23.690 82't.410.3 r'10.33
o3t19124 13'.27 23.690 10.3 1.4 1'10.06
o3t19t24 13:28 10.3 1.4 110.23 482
o3t'19124 13:29 23.689 10.3 1.4 110.24
o3119124 13:30 10.3 1.4 1 10.30 480
03119124 13:31 23.689 10.3 1.4 110.2'.1 478
o3119t24 13:32 1.4 110.51 477
03t19t24 13:33 23.688 10.2 1.4 110.47
o3t19124 13:34 1.4 1'10.33 477
o3t19t24 13:35 23.686 10.2 1.4 110.06
o3t19t24 13:36 1.4 109.74 477
oa1st24 1 3:37 23.686 1.410.2 109.74 477
03119124 13:38 23.686 1.4
03t19t24 13:39 23.685 10.2 1.4 109.86 476
o3t19t24
o3t'19t24 '1.410_113:41 23.684 1 '10. 16
o3t19124 23.6U 1.4 109.89 481
03119124 13:43 23.6U 1.410.2
03t19t24 13i44 23.683 1.410.2 1 10.07 483
o3t19t24 1.4 '109.90
03119t24 4821.4lo.213:46 23.682 109.73
o3119t24 '10.3 1.4 '109.97
03t19t24 l3:48 23.681 10.2 1.6 110.31 479
o3t19t24 1.4 '110.32
03t19t24 l3:50 23.681 10.2 1.4 110.29 477
o3t't9124 23.682 1.410.1 109.95
o3t19124 l3:52 23.682 1.410.1 109.71 479
o3t19t24 1 3:53 1.410.'l
03t19t24 1 3:54 23.680 1.410.1 110.00 482
o3t19124 I 3:55 1.4'10.1 1'10.01
03119t24 1 3:56 23.680 1.410.1 1'1o.24 4U
olt't9t24 13:57 1.4't0.1 1',to.28
03t't9t24 13:58 23.674 1.410.1 110.34 480
03119t24 13:59 1.410.1 1 10.66
03t19t24 14:00 23.678 1.410.1 1't 0.84 477
03t19t24 14:O'l 1.410.1 110.86
Page 39 of 70
F = Unit Offline
E = Exceedance
M = Maintenance
T = Out Of Control
Report Generated: 04/O5 / 24 12:36
GP043AS-036878-RT-1 557
C = Calibration
S = Substituted
* = Suspect
03t19t24
Average Data - Run 2
Plant: HUNTINGTON PLANT
lnterval: 1 Minute
Type: Block
Report Period: 031191202412:02 Through 03t19t2024 14:10
Time Online Criteria: 1 minute(s)
23.677 10.1 1.4 110.81
o3t19t24 1.4 110.71 478
o3t't9124 14:05 1.410.0 110.32
t'10.641.4't0.0
't0.0 1.4 1 10.84
110.82 478
23.674
Average
Minimum
Maximum
Summation
Geometric Mean
lncluded Data Points
Total number of Data
P^i.la
23.696
23.674
23.716
3,056.821
10.3
10.0
10.4
1,294.0
1.4
'1.4
1.6
142.1
110.56
109.71
111.75
14,261.79
480
468
490
61.881
129
125
129
129
129
129
126
'129
129
1?9
F = Unit Offline
E = Exceedance
M = Maintenance
T = Out Of Control
Report Generated: 04105 I 24 12:36
GP043AS-036878-RT- 1 55 7
C = Galibration
S = Substatuted
* = Suspect
Page 40 of 70
Source
O3ngn4 14:30
Average Data - Run 3
Plant: HUNTINGTON PI-ANT
lnterval: 1 Minute
Type: Block
Report Period: 03/191202414:30 Through 0311912024 16:45
23.608 1.410.0 1 10.59
Time Online Criteria: 1 minute(s)
UNITl
BARPRESS
(INHG)
co2
/PCT'l
OPAClTY
lPCT}
STKTEMP
(DEGF)
UNITLOAT)
(lvfW)
031191i21 14:3'l 't.4 110.61 475
0nn9n1 1+32 23.667 10.0 1.4 110.90
VJ|1U24 14:33 23.668 1.4 110.87 176
VJl19l24 14:31 23.668 10.0 1.4 110.62
O3l1Sl24 14:35 23.ffi7 't.1 110.69 479
03l'19124 14:36 23.O67 10.1 1.4 '| 10.81 479
Og1Sn4 {137 23.666 l0.t 1.3 111.O2 478
03l1Sn4 14:38 23.606 10.1 1.4 1 I 0.92
$hSnl 14:39 23.665 to_'l 1.1 I 1't.10 475
O3t1Sl24 14:40 23.666 10.1 1.4 111.04 174
o3l1Sl24 14i41 23.665 10.1 '1.1 110.87 475
0U19n4 fi:42 23.666 't0.1 1.3 110.91 476
Ogl19l24 14:43 23.665 10.1 1.4 111.O7
osh9l21 11..4 23.668 10.1 1.3 1 10.80 €0
OU1S|24 14:15 23.060 10.1 1.3 '110.52
03119121 11:8 23.666 10.1 1.3 110.24 179
o3l1sn4 ft"47 23.685 10.1 1't 0.60 177
OU1S|21 14:48 23.665 10.1 1.3 110.68 475
O3ngn21 14:49 10.1 1.3 110.48 474
O3l1U24 14:50 23.665 47510.0 1.3 110.44
03119121 14:51 1.3 110.43 475
o3t19t21 11..52 23.664 10.0 1.3 1 1 0.57
O3l'lSllU 14:53 474110.411.4
Og19n4 14:54 23.O62 10.0 '1.3 1 10.09
O3/1el21 1.[:55 10.0 1.3 I 10.1 7 472
03119n4 14:56 23.663 10.1 1.3 110.17 172
$l1Sn1 ft:57 23.482 10.0 't.3 110.52 472
03115124 14:58 23.682 10.1 1.3 1 10.rt5 472
03119124 '14:59 t0.t 1.3 110.?1 171
03119124 15:00 23.ffiz 10.1 1.3 110.21 175
Og19n1 15:01 't0.1 1.3 1 1 0.05 474
0919n4 15:02 23.661 10.1 1.4 109.93 474
O3/19n1 15:03 23.660 10.1 1.3 110.18 471
03119n4 15:Od 23.461 10.1 1.4 110.49 171
O3ngn1 15:05 10.'l 1.3 110.42 475
Vil19n1 15:06 23.660 10.1 1.3 477
10.1
109.94
Page 41 of 70
Og19n1 15:07 1.3
r = frntf vrfllnE
E = Erceedance
M = Maintenance
T = Out Of Control
Report Generatedl. O4IOS 124 t2:37
GP043AS-036878- RT- 1 5 57
G = Calibration
S = Substituted
* = Suspect
03119124 15:08
Average Data - Run 3
Plant: HUNTINGTON PLANT
lnterval: 1 Minute
Type: Block
Report Period: 0311912024 14:30 Through 0311912024 16:45
Time Online Criteria: 1 minute(s)
23.659 10.1 't.4 110.09 479
o3t't9t24 15:09 23.658 10.1 1.3 110.12 479
03119124 15:10 1_3 't10.27
03119124 15:11 23.658 1.410.2 1 10.39
O3l'lSl24 15:'12 23_658 10.2 476'1.4 110.24
o3t19124 15:13 't.4 't10.17
03119124 15:'14 23.658 10.2 4751.4 '109.64
oa19t24 15:15 23.659 10.2 4771.4 '110.00
03/19t24 15:16 23.660 10.2 '110.36
03t19n4 15:17 23.661 4751.310.1 1 10.95
o3119t24 l5:18 '1.410.1 110.47
03t19124 15:19 23.661 4731.410.1 109.98
o3t19t24 15:2O 1.410.1
o\t19t24 15i21 23.661 4751.4't0.1 '109.99
o3t19124 15:22 23.661 4751.410.1 1 10.37
o3t'19t24 'l.5:23 23.660 1.4'10.1 1 10.50
o3t19t24 15:24 23.660 4771.410.1 '110.3s
o3t't9124 15:25 23.659 1.410.1
o3t19t24 15:26 23.660 4771.310.1 '109.43
03t19t24 15:27 23.660 1.4
o3t'19t24 15:28 23.660 4741.410.2 109.71
03t19t24 15:29 1.4 109.65
03t19t24 15:30 23.660 10.2 1.4 10s.77 473
03t1st24 15:31 1.3 110.17 474
03t19t24 15:32 23.660 10.2 1.4 110.12 474
olt19t24 1 5:33 10.2 47514109.96
03119124 15:34 23.659 1.410.2 109.73
o3119124 15:35 4791.3 109.81
03119124 15:36 23.659 1.410.2 109.74
Ogl19l24 15:37 23.659 480't.410.2 109.82
o3119t24 '15:38 23.659 1.4 109.97
o3119124 '15:39 23.659 't.410.3 1'10.21 476
O3l19n4 15:40 23.659 1.3 110.29 474
1.310.2o3119124 15:41 110.46 174
03119t24 15:42 23.660 1.310.2 110.30 475
1.310.2o!19n4 15:43 1 1 0.30 475
o3t19t24 15..44 23.658 t.3'1o.2 110.24 475
1.3olt19t2415:45 109.83 475
03119t24 15:46 23.658 t.310.2 109.56 475
o3t19t24 15:47 1.3 '109.73
03119124 15:48 23.658 1.4 47410.2 110.01
Page 42 of 70
F = Unit Offline
E = Exceedance
M = Maintenance
T = Out Of Control
Report Generated: O4/O5/24 t2:37
GP043AS-036878-RT- 1 5 57
C = Calibration
S = Substituted
* = Suspect
o3t1gt24 15:49
Average Data - Run 3
Plant: HUNTINGTON PI-ANT
lnterval: 1 Minute
Type: Block
Report Period: 431191202414:30 Through 0311912024 16:45
Time Online Criteria: 1 minute(s)
23.658 10.3 1.4 110.05 473
oa1gn1 15:50 10.3 1.4 ! r0.13 473
o3t1sl24 l5:5'l 23.658 10.2 'I10.36 473
o3t19t21 15:52 10.2 1.1 1'.to.42 175
0u19n4 l5:53 23.658 10.2 1.1 110.08 474
og19n4 15:54 10.2 1.4 110.00
o3l1sn4 15:55 23.658 10.3 1.3 110.09 478
o3t19n4 15:56 23.658 10.3 1.3 1 1 0.39
oglsru l5:57 23,058 1.3 1 10.90 477
03t19124 '15:58 23.658 10.3 1.3 1 1't.39
oa1g24 l5:59 23.658 1.4 1 11.66 477
o3l19l2a 23.657 10.3 1.3 111.70
03/19n4 16:0't 23.657 4.6 I 1.3 111.97 qa
o3t19t21 23.657 '10.3 I 1.4 11 1.81
ou19ti24 l6:03 23.657 10.3 I 1.4 1't 1.83 477
o3t19124 23.657 10.3 r 1.4 111.42
o3119t24 l8:05 23.658 1.3 't11.82 475
ost19t24 16:06 23.658 10.2 1.4 1 I 1.89 474
o3,t1sl21 16:07 23.058 1.4 111.72 471
og19n1 23.658 10.3 1.4 fi1.74 409
osh9t24 10:09 23.657 10.3 't.1 1'11.79 1169
03119t24 16:10 '10.3 1.4 1 I 1.88
03119124 't0:11 23.457 447'10.3 1.3 112.24
o3t19t24 1A:.12 23.657 10.2 1.3 1 12.60
Oil19l21 16:13 23.656 lo.2 1.3 112.27 4U
o3t19t24 16:14 10.2 1.3 112.43 &
ost19t21 l0:'15 23.656 112.2110.1 1.3 4il
03119t24 16:16 23.656 10.1 1.3 112.O5 M
03t19t21 16:17 23.656 t0.1 1.3 112.15 4A2
o3t19n4 16;18 23.657 11?.25
ou't9124 16:20 23.656 10.1 1.3 111.U 4il
o3t19t24 23.656 10.1 1.3 111.71 451
ou1sn4 16:22 23.657 10.1 1.3 r1.74 w
03,19n4 10.2 1.3 111.70 446
o3hsl24 1A:24 23.67 1.3 111.7A
o3119t24 16:25 10.2 1.4 111.75 439
03l1sn+16:28 23.658 10.1 1.4 t 11.50
ou19n4 16i27 10.1 1 .3 11 1.30 425
03/1gn4 10:28 23.658 10.1 1.4
10.0
111.64
Page 43 of 70
o3119124 16:29 23.A57
F = Unit Offline
E = Exceedance
M = Malntenance
T = Out Of Control
Report Generated: O4/O5124 72:37
GP043AS-036878-RT- 1 557
C = Calibration
S = Substituted
* = Suspect
03119124 16:30
Average Data - Run 3
Plant: HUNTINGTON PIANT
lnterval: 1 Minute
Type: Block
Report Period: 031191202414:30 Through 0311912024 16:45
Time Online Criteria: 1 minute(s)23.657 10.0 14 4U
03t19t24 16:31 23.656 oo 1.3 111.04
OU19l24 16:32 10.0 1.3 I 10.97 403
03t19t24 16:33 23.656 1.3 110.67
41810.0o3t19124l6:34 23.656 1.3 110.65
o3t'tst24 16:35 23.656 10.1 1.3
03t19t24 16:36 23.656 10.2 1.3 I 10.04
o3t19124 16:37 1.4 1t0.31
03119t24 16:38 23.655
o3t19n4 16:39 1.4 't11.72
ost19t24 23.655 1.4 112.31
o3t19t24 16:4'l 10.3 1.4 1't2.80 438
o3t19124 16:42 23.654 'I.3 113.06
Ogl19l24 '16:43 10.'l 1.3 113.52 431
o3t'tst24 16:44 23.654 1.3 1 13.69
03t19t24 9.9 1.3 1',t3.52 418
Average
Minimum
Maximum
Summation
Geometric Mean
lncluded Data Poinls
Total number of Data
p^inte
F = Unit Offline
E = Exceedance
M = Maintenance
T = Out Of Control
Report Generated 04/05/24 t2:37
GP043AS-036878-RT-1557
1.3
1.3
1.4
t83.5
C = Calibration
S = Substituted
* = Suspect
23.660
23.654
23.668
3.2't7.703
10.1
9.9
10.4
1,339.5
1 1 0.83
109.43
1t3.69
15,072.58
466
401
480
63,372
136
136
'136
136
136
136
132
136
136
'136
Page 44 of 70
Appendix C
Laboratory Analysis Data
Appendix C.1
Gravimetric Analyses
GP043AS-036878-RT- 1557 Page 46 of 70
#h m?f l,\H)!
Proiect Code:
EPA Method5l2O2 Gravimetric Analysis Report
PROJ-036878
Date Finalized:41212024
Analyst:T. Woitach
Analytical Narrative
Filters were dessicated and tared to a constant weight in the MAQS laboratory prior to sampling. Following testing,
the filters were dessicated for at least 24 hours, then weighed to a constant weight (10.5 mg). The acetone rinses
were measured to the nearest milliliter, transferred to tared aluminum weighing dishes, taken to dryness under a
fume hood, dessicated for at least 24 hours, then weighed to a constant weight (t0.5 mg), Each result above
represents total filterable particulate matter for each test run (acetone rinse + filter catch), with no blank correction
performed unless otherwise indicated.
Teflon CPM filters were extracted in a sonicator three times with water and three times with hexane. The extraction
water was added to the back-half impinger contents and extracted with hexane three times in a separatory funnel.
The inorganic fraction was transferred to a tared Teflon baggie, baked at 105C until 10 mL remained, taken to dryness
under a fume hood, dessicated for at least 24 hours, then weighed to a constant weight (t0.5 mg). The organic
fraction was combined with the acetone and hexane field rinses, measured to the nearest milliliter, transferred to a
tared aluminum weighing dish, taken to dryness under a fume hood, dessicated for at least 24 hours, then weighed
to a constant weight (t0.5 mg). No blank correction was performed unless otherwise indicated.
lnstrumentation
All measurements were taken using a Torbal Model AGCN200 Analytical Balance under laboratory conditions. The
instrument is auto-calibrated and challanged with three NIST-traceable reference weights daily.
Detection timit / Sensitivity
All measurements are recorded to 0.00019 (0.1mg).
Notes
No deviations from the analytical procedures from EPA Method 5 were noted. All samples were received in good
condition. After analysis, all samples are archived for a period of one year.
Attachments
Gravimetric Analysis Logs
Sample Chain of Custody
Laboratory Results Summary
Sample lD Filterable Particulate Matter (ms)
Huntington Unit 1, Run #1 31.1
Huntington Unit 1, Run #2 24.9
Huntington Unit 1, Run #3 18.9
Sample !D Condensable Particulate Matter (msl
Huntington Unit 1, Run #1 3.5
Huntington Unit 1, Run #2 5.5
Huntington Unit 1, Run #3 5.5
'Blank corrections were performed in accordance with EPA Method 5.
:PM value includes a field blank correction.
GP043AS-036878-RT- 1 557 Page 47 of 70
flft\ mqN l, +,H)! EPAMethod5GravimetricAnatvsisLog
Project Code: PROJ-035878
Unit lD: Huntington Unit 1
Front-Half Particulate Matter Filter Catch
Run #1
Filterfi 1664
Final Filter weight fl1 (gl
Final Filter Weight fl2 (gl
Filter Tare Weight #1 (g)
Filter Tare Weight f2 (g)
Fiher Catch (g)
Front-Half Particulate Matter Acetone Rlnse Catch
Run #2
L673
Run S3
1899
Blank
1895
Date Weight (s)0ate weisht (s)Date Date weisht (g)
3127124 0.3810 3/27124 0.3818 31271)4 o.3794 3/27/24 o.3728
3/28/24 0.3811 3/28/24 0.3819 3/28/24 o.3794 3/28124 0.3727
Ll27/22 0.3730 Ll27l22 0.3753 9/Lsl23 0.374s s/Ls/23 0.3730
7/LU22 0.3735 7lLLl22 0.3755 e/2s/23 0.3749 sl2s/23 0.3728
0.0078 0.fi,55 0.m47 -0.m01
Run #1
Rinse Volume (mll 106.4
Rinse Mass (g) 83.5
Run #2
98.7
Run#3 Blank
L25.7 125.0 99.7
98.1 78.3
Final Dish Weight #1 (g)
Final Dish Weight #2 (Sl
Dish Tare Weight (g)
Dlsh Tare Welght (g)
Total Rinse Catch (g)
Acetone Blank Correction
Tin # 844L 8442 84/,3 g44O
Date weight (d Date weiSht (8) Date weight (g) Date weight (8)
3/27/24 6.3497 3127124 6.4202 3127124 6.4s24 3/27124 6.4142
3/28/24 6.3497 3/28124 6.420t 3/28127 rl6/L900 3128/24 6.4t4t
218/24 5.3259 218124 6.40L2 218124 6.4377 218/24 6.4L36
2lsl24 6.3262 2/e124 5.4016 zle/24 6.4378 219/24 6.4t4L
0.0236 0.0188 0.0146 0.flr03
EPA Method 5 972.6: Acetone Blonk Concentrotion
Where:
C o = Acetone blank residue concentrotion (mS/mS)
m o = Moss of residue of ocetone ofter evoporation (mg)
V o = Volume of ocetone blonk (mL)
p o = Density of acetone (785 mg/mL)
EPA Method 5 572.7: Acetone Wosh Blonk
w" = C"%*p. Eq. s-s)
Where:
W o = Weight of residue in ocetone wosh (mg)
C o = Acetone blank residue concentrotion (mS/mS)
V o* = Volume of ocetone wosh (mL)
p o = Density of ocetone (785 mg/mL)
Run #7: (3.83E-06)(106.4)(785) = 0.j mg
Run #2: (3.83E-06)(12s.7)(78s) = 0.4 ms
Run #3: (3.83E-06)(125.0)(785) = 0.4 mg
Total Particulate Catch
- me 0.3- V"p, Gq. s-4) " (1oox78s)= 3.83E-O5 mg/mg
Moximum Allowoble Blonk lmo)
0.8
7.0
7.O
Run fl
Filter Catch (g) 0.0078
+ Rinse Catch (g) 0.0236
- Acetone Blank (g) 0.0003
Run S2
0.0065
0.0188
0.0004
Run #3
0.0047
0.0146
0.0004
rotal PM (g) 0.0311
G P043AS-036878-RT- 1 557
0.0189
Page 48 of 70
r#r\ mYN l,*H)!EPA Method2O2 Gravimetric Analysis Log
Proiect Code:PROJ-036878
Unit lD:Huntington Unit 1
Back-Half Organic Particulate Matter Catch
Tin f
Final Weight fl (g)
FinalWeight fl2 (g)
Tare Weight #1 (g)
Tare Weight #2 (g)
Organic CPM Catch (g)
Back-Half lnorganic Particulate Matter Catch
Run f1
8453
Date Weight (g)
Run f2
8405
Date Weight (g)
Run #3
8404
Date Weight (g)
Blank
8454
Date Weight (g)
4lLl24 6.4t94 4h124 6.32s8 4lL/24 5.3s68 4ltl24 6.3312
4/L124 6.4ts4 4/t124 6.3256 4/1124 6.3966 417/24 5.3308
218124 6.417L 2lsl24 6.3229 2/s124 6.3946 218/24 5.3285
2lel24 6.4!74 216t24 6.3233 2/6124 0304s 219/24 i 6.3289
0.0021 0.0026 0.0021 0.0023
Teflon Baggie f
FinalWeight #1 (g)
FinalWeight f2 (g)
Tare Weight #1 (g)
Tare Weight #2 (g)
lnorganic CPM Catch (g)
Condensable Particulate Catch
Run fl
1848
Date Weight (g)
4ltl24 3.8509
411124
2/81
Run f2
1837
Date Weight (8)
4ltl24
4lLl24
Run f3
18s6
BIank
1838
24 3,8474 218/24 4.07e8
0.0049
Weight (g)Weight (g)
4/t/24 3.8624
4/2124 3.9781 i.eers
2/7/24 3.9727 ?/xlzL 1186f7
0.0055
l
Date
4.0846 4ltl24
3.9728 217/24 3.8617
Organic CPM Catch (g)
+ lnorganic CPM Catch (g)
- CPM Blank (e)
Run fi1
0.0021
0.0034
0.0020
Run fl2
0.0025
0.0049
0.0020
Run f3
0.0021
0.0055
0.0020
Total cPM (8)0.0035 0.0055 0.0056
GP043AS-035878-RT- 1 557 Page 49 of 70
ffiM?NTryOPE
Laboratory Chain of Custody Record
ProJect Gode:t eoJ - rtZ LTTY
Cllent:Pn.t k, . aA P
Faclllty:f1v,'Ttr,tb fa ,t, V f-
Unlt:I
Sample Date(s):> ln )cq
ProJec't Manager:J),5r.^.,M
Sample lD / Run # Fllter lD
Front y,
Acetone Back % Hexane Back YzWaler
TIn ID Volume
trlzf.o Tln lD Volume@rt
Eaggl
6
ID
Volume
IJt,,G
[L',*l ) /,c't t'lu 1
q3 -S fius3 l6t-3 tgY.t )"t1- t-
{l,,PZ l6T3 SVL{ I "tt.?Z\O,139,3 tt7?3?7.I
ILv rt\l81e tL(,t3 fr. I t4ou l2,l.z l65L 7r2.1
IJ La"rt/)we 8Y Yo 7tJ ?'t5I Itz-z tgb{lzt.7
Rerinquished by: GW IV Wn " ,Date: j /Lz /r't
Received bv:
-Ztaf
Date ,,/;u/r+
GP043AS-035878-RT-1ss7 Page 50 of 70
Appendix D
Quality Assurance/Quality Control
Appendix D.1
Units and Abbreviations
60 tt?Nr*gp.H
UNITS AND ABBREVIATIONS
@Xo/o 02 corrected to X% oxygen (corrected for dilution air)
lCCl absolute value of the confidence coefficient
ldl absolute value of the mean differencesoC degrees CelsiusoF degrees FahrenheitoR degrees Rankine
" HzO inches of water column
13.6 specific gravity of mercury
AH pressure drop across orifice meter, inches H2O
AP velocity head of stack gas, inches H2O
0 total sampling time, minutes
Ug microgram
9^ density of acetone, mg/ml
pw density of water, 0.9982 g/ml or 0.002201 lb/ml
acfm actual cubic feet of gas per minute at stack conditions
An cross-sectional area of nozzle, ft'
A. cross-sectional area of stack, square feet (ft')
Btu British thermal unit
B*" proportion by volume of water vapor in gas stream
C" particulate matter concentration in stack gas, gr/acf
Crrs average unadjusted gas concentration, ppmv
Coi, measured concentration of calibration gas, ppmv
cf or ft3 cubic feet
cfrn cubic feet per minute
CG". average gas concentration adjusted for bias, ppmv
CM average of initial and final system bias check responses from upscale calibration gas, ppmv
cm or m3 cubic meters
Cr',rr actual concentration of the upscale calibration gas, ppmv
Co average of initial and final system bias check responses from lowJevel calibration gas, ppmv
Cp pitot tube coefficient
C. particulate matter concentration in stack gas, gr/dscf
CS calibration span, % or ppmv
Cs measured concentration of calibration gas, ppmv
Cv manufactured certified concentration of calibration gas, ppmv
D drift assessment, % of span
dcf dry cublc feet
dcm dry cubic meters
Dn diameter of nozzle, inches
Ds diameter of stack, inches
dscf dry standard cubic feet
dscfm dry standard cubic feet per minute
dscm dry standard cubic meters
Fd F-factor, dscf/MMBtu of heat input
fpm feet per minutefps feet per second
feet
square feet
gram
gallonsgr grains (7000 grains per pound)gr/dscf grains per dry standard cubic feet
hour
ft
f(
s
gal
GP043AS-036878-RT-1557 Page 53 of 70
A/i\ MONTROSE
- I AIR qUALITY SERVICES
UNITS AND ABBREVIATIONS
I percent of isokinetic samplingin inch
k kilo or thousand (metric units, multiply by 103)K kelvin (temperature)
K3 conversion factor 0.0154 gr/mg
& conversion factor 0.002668 ((in. HgXft"))/((mtX'R))
kg kilogram
$ pitot tube constant (85.49 fUsec)
kwscfh thousand wet standard cubic feet per hourI literslb/hr pounds per hourlb/MMBtu pounds per million Btulpm liters per minutem meter or milliM thousand (English units) or mega (million, metric units)
m3 cubic meters
ma mass of residue of acetone after evaporation, mg
Md molecular weight of stack gas; dry basis, lb/lb-mole
meq milliequivalentmg milligram
Mg megagram (106 grams)
min minute
ml or mL millilitermm millimeterMM million (English units)MMBtu/hr million Btu per hour
mn total amount of particulate matter collected, mg
mol mole
mol. wt. or MW molecular weight
Ms molecular weight of stack gas; wet basis, lb/lb-mole
MW molecular weight or megawattn number of data points
ng nanogramnm nanometer
Po", barometric pressure, inches Hg
pg picogram
Ps stack static pressure, inches H2O
Pm barometric pressure of dry gas meter, inches Hg
ppb parts per billionppbv parts per billion, by volumeppbvd parts per billion by volume, dry basisppm parts per millionppmv parts per million, by volumeppmvd parts per million by volume, dry basisppmvw parts per million by volume, wet basisPs absolute stack gas pressure, inches Hg
psi pounds per square inchpsia pounds per square inch absolutepsig pounds per square inch gauge
Psro standard absolute pressure, 29.92 inches Hg
Qa volumetric flow rate, actual conditions, acfrn
Q" volumetric flow rate, standard conditions, scfrn
Qsto volumetric flow rate, dry standard conditions, dscfm
R ideat gas constant 21.85 ((in. Hg) (ft3)y((.R) (tbmote))
GP043AS-036878-RT- 1 557 Page 54 of 70
64\ It?N,T+P.,s.E-
UNITS AND ABBREVIATIONS
SBnna post-run system bias check, % ofspan
SBi pre-run system bias check, % ofspan
scf standard cubic feet
scfh standard cubic feet per hour
scfrn standard cubic feet per minute
scm standard cubic meters
scmh standard cubic meters per hour
sec second
sf, sq. ft., or ft2 square feet
std standard
t metric ton (1000 kg)
T o.szs t-value
Ta absolute average ambient temperature, oR (+459.67 for English)
Tm absolute average dry gas meter temperature, oR (+459.67 for English)
ton ort ton = 2000 pounds
tph ortons/hr tons per hour
tpy ortons/yr tons peryear
Ts absolute average stack gas meter temperature, oR (+459.67 for English)
Tsto absolute temperature at standard conditions
volt
Va volume of acetone blank, ml
V"* volume of acetone used in wash, ml
V6 total volume H2O collected in impingers and silica gel, grams
Vm volume of gas sampled through dry gas meter, ft"
Vm(srd) volume of gas measured by the dry gas meter, corrected to standard conditions, dscf
Vm" stack gas volume sampled, acf
Vn volume collected at stack conditions through nozzle, act
Vs average stack gas velocity, feet per second
Vwclstol volume of water vapor condensed, corrected to standard conditions, scf
V*i(.to) volume of water vapor in gas sampled from impingers, scf
Vwss(std) volume of water vapor in gas sampled from silica gel, scf
W watt
Wa weight of residue in acetone wash, mg
Wirp total weight of impingers, grams
Wss total weight of silica gel, grams
Y dry gas meter calibration factor, dimensionless
GP043AS-036878-RT- 1557 Page 55 of 70
6O AA?N,ISST.H
ACRONYMS
AAS atomic absorption spectroscopyACDP air contaminant discharge permit
ACE analyzer calibration error, percent of spanAD absolute differenceADL above detection limitAETB Air Emissions Testing BodyAS applicable standard (emission limit)ASTM American Society For Testing And MaterialsBACT best achievable control technologyBDL below detection limitBHP brake horsepower
BIF boiler and industrial furnaceBLS black liquor solidsCC confidence coefficientCD calibration driftCE calibration errorCEM continuous emissions monitorCEMS continuous emissions monitoring systemCERMS continuous emissions rate monitoring systemCET calibration error testCFR Code of Federal RegulationsCGA cylinder gas auditCHNOS elemental analysis for determination of C, H, N, O, and S content in fuelsCNCG concentrated non-condensable gas
CO catalytic oxidizerCOC chain of custodyCOMS continuous opacity monitoring systemCPM condensible particulate matterCPMS continuous parameter monitoring systemCT combustion turbineCTM conditional test methodCTO catalytic thermal oxidizerCVAAS cold vapor atomic absorption spectroscopy
D" equivalent diameter
DE destruction efficiencyDioxins polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (pcdd's)DLL detection level limitedDNCG dilute non-condensable gas
ECD electron capture detectorEIT Engineer ln TrainingELCD electoconductivity detector (hall detector)EMPC estimated maximum possible concentrationEPA US Environmental Protection AgencyEPRI Electric Power Research lnstituteES emission standard (applicable limit)ESP electrostatic precipitator
EU emission unitFCCU fluid catalytic cracking unitFGD flue gas desulfurizationFl flame ionizationFIA flame ionization analyzerFID flame ionization detectorFPD flame photometric detectorFPM filterable particulate matterFTIR Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopyFTPB field train proof blankFTRB field train recovery blankFurans polychlorinated dibenzofurans (pcdfs)
GC gas chromatography
GP043AS-036878-RT- 1 5 57 Page 56 of 70
,6d l'lgN,I+gP.H
ACRONYMS
GC/MS gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy
GFAAS graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy
GFC gas filter correlation
GHG greenhouse gas
HAP hazardous air pollutant
HC hydrocarbons
HHV higher heating value
HPLC high performance liquid chromatography
HRGC/HRMS high-resolution gas chromatography/high-resolution mass spectroscopy
HRSG heat recovery steam generator
lC ion chromatography
ICAP inductively-coupled argon plasmography
ICPCR ion chromatography with a post-column reactor
ICP-MS inductively coupled plasma-mass spectroscopy
lR infrared radiation
ISO lnternational Standards Organization
kW kilowatts
LFG landfill gas
LHV lower heating value
LPG liquified petroleum gas
MACT maximum achievable control technology
MDI methylene diphyenyldiisocyanate
MDL method detection limit
MNOC maximum normal operating conditions
MRL method reporting limit
MS mass spectrometry
NA not applicable or not available
NCASI National Council For Air And Steam lmprovement
NCG non-condensable gases
ND not detected
NDIR nondispersive infrared
NESHAP National Emissions Standards For Hazardous Air Pollutants
NG natural gas
NIOSH National lnstitute For Occupational Safety And Health
NIST National lnstitute Of Standards And Technology
NMC non-methane cutter
NMOC non-methane organic compounds
NMVOC non-methane volatile organic compounds
NPD nitrogen phosphorus detector
NSPS New Source Performance Standards
OSHA Occupational Safety And Health Administration
PAH polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
PCB polychlorinated biphenyl compounds
PCWP plywood and composite wood products
PE Professional Engineer
PFAS per- and polyfluoroalkylsubstances (PFAS)
Pl photoionization
PID photoionization detector
PM particulate matter
PMro particulate matter less than 10 microns in aerodynamic diameter
PMz.s particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in aerodynamic diameter
POM polycyclic organic matterPS performance specification
PSD particle size distribution
PSEL plant site emission limits
PST performance specification testPTE permanent total enclosure
PTM performance test method
GP043AS-036878-RT- 1 557 Page 57 of 70
64\ lt?NT+P.p.H
ACRONYMS
QA/QC quality assurance and quality controlQl Qualified lndividual
QSTI Qualified Source Testing lndividualRA relative accuracyRAA relative accuracy auditRACT reasonably available control technologyRATA relative accuracy test auditRCTO rotary concentrator thermal oxidizerRICE stationary reciprocating internal combustion engineRM reference method
RTO regenerative thermal oxidizer
SAM sulturic acid mist
SCD sulfur chemiluminescent detectorSCR selective catalytic reduction systemSD standard deviationSemi-VOST semivolatile organic compounds sample trainSRM standard reference materialTAP toxic air pollutant
TBD to be determinedTCA thermal conductivity analyzerTCD thermal conductivity detectorTGNENMOC total gaseous non-ethane non-methane organic compoundsTGNMOC total gaseous non-methane organic compoundsTGOC total gaseous organic compoundsTHC total hydrocarbonsTIC tentatively identified compoundTO thermal oxidizerTO toxic organic (as in EPA Method TO-15)TPM total particulate matter
TSP total suspended particulate matterTTE temporary total enclosureULSD ultraJow sulfur dieselUV ultraviolet radiation rangeVE visible emissionsVOC volatile organic compoundsVOST volatile organic sample trainWC water columnWWTP waste watertreatment plant
GP043AS-036878-RT- 1 557 Page 58 of 70
60 l+?N,I+p.p.I
silver
arsenic
barium
beryllium
carbon
Cd cadmium
CdS cadmium sulfide
CH2O formaldehyde
CH3CHO acetaldehyde
CH3OH methanol
CHo methane
C2H4O ethylene oxide
CzHo ethane
CaH4O acrolein
CaH6O propionaldehyde
CgHa
C.H.OH phenol
Cl, chlorine
CHEMICAL NOMENCLATURE
Ag
As
Ba
Be
c
Se selenium
SOz sulfur dioxide
SO. sulfur trioxide
SO, sulfur oxides
TCDD tetrachlorodibenzodioxinTCDF tetrachlorodibenzofuran
TGOC total gaseous organic concentration
THC total hydrocarbons
Tl thallium
TRS total reduced sulfur compounds
Zn zinc
cl02
co
Co
Coz
Cr
Cu
Eto
chlorine dioxide
carbon monoxide
cobalt
carbon dioxide
chromium
copper
ethylene oxide
Hzo
EtOH ethylalcohol(ethanol)
H2 hydrogen
HzOz hydrogen peroxide
HzS hydrogen sulfide
HzSO4 sulfuric acid
HCI hydrogen chlorideHg mercuryIPA isopropyl alcoholMDI methylene diphyenyl diisocyanate
MeCl2 methylene chloride
MEK methyl ethyl ketone
MeOH methanolMn manganese
nitrogen
ammonia
nickel
nitric oxide
nitrogen dioxide
nitrogen oxides
oxygen
P phosphorus
Pb lead
PCDD polychlorinated dibenzo-pdioxinsPCDF polychlorinated dibenzofurans
antimony
N2
NHg
Ni
NO
Noz
Nq
o2
GP043AS-036878-RT-1557 Page 59 of 70
Appendix D.2
Manual Test Method QA/QC Data
EPA Method 5
Meter Box Calibration by Calibrated Critical Orifice,
Leak Check, and Thermocouple Calibration Check
English Meter Box Units, English K' Factor
Yd:0.9905
AH@:1.765
11.50 in.Hg
Meter Box Orlrlce Callbratlon
IMPORTNT For v.lid l.d r.suk,lh. kudV.cuum thould b. 1 lo 2 in. Hg gr.abrtEn lh tuordbl Cro€lVlaum tun.bow
IMPoRTNT tu cri6lonfre Co.fti.nl, K'. mud b..il.r.d in Eng[.h unn.. (n)^3'(d.g R)tt((in.H9)'(min)).
a@.plabl6ld6Ene of idMdulwlurliom th.Br4o b +rc.@.
For Orfro Calibnlbn F.dor aHO.lh. offi€ difeGdElpr.$uG an intu.ot Hrchd quatealo0.T5dm ol ii
d A F and A.P inch$olH9,.@.pl.bl.ldo€ne olhdMdulnlu.. ftom tb.w6ge ir +rc.2.
QA Criteria:
os 10m DASB 59t4 so go so 15 14 0 6/
Meter Box Pre$uro Leak Check Meter Box Vacuum Leak Check
EtPt lhmffil
ld b. E7 in. HrO
b.26rc (mrromd, l.v.l ltablofor 1 mind6)
23
hlhtfit:
adjud wV.fullyop.n, frn. rdjudfullydoed, empb inbl pluggd
zlro (m31ff dial 3tabl. for 1 minut )
Meter Box Thermocouple Readout Callbretlon Check
rnpu!High
12D I 11 129
25U
334
20 aao
GP043AS-035878-RT- 1557 Ebr bor honh aribnpurydltft 6r)rb
METHOD 5 GRITICAL ORIFICE CAUBRANON
GETIC^LOilHCf Uf fn:@
urlffi]llmrctil{m**[El*r--**l7l *.r-.|E-l
Supply Company, lnc.
il rc N tu It
il ,a.l ru ru ,ul;l'[-_r"l-@l-ffi-'l .-
l_J t I r. I f I lr,raI l$..r.0 lrt..r. l c..
lT] ' I rT'il l-ffiiTEill cr,r| - l I ,!-I=-l lE-l [.orgTiii.ro--]'allr
fj;l ,l.oT;-l-@16l .'.
l_J t I r. I r. I I,r''rl l.rCtol.8t...0 lr.!
fi'EEl
-
@1*-'l ,,.i
l_J r I r I r. I lr... l l.2r,r.rl.s!.ro. 1 1..r
lT] ' I r.-T-]i-l fGTffil .,.| " I, t,.1--l la6l FrrlrTEI ro
rl.
7t0c
?to
?(G
?air
,,alo
,att
,{rt
?(S
til,a
T.- I T.- If-ro I I .r-l
AlBrlrcllRrT-il-] T.- If- r---'l I 1n 1
AtOrF glot.
--r I fr;lI .-- f r- I
AvB r ttClDR.T-ffi-l T,;lf-'",--l fT.;-]
att K ?rglfi.
Ttl.o] T.-If-]'o-l I r!. 1
A\B T FAgIOi.
,.tttaEaa
0m, crltt ,.tlItaa
ttc{a
o..ttt o.ttl ttcEaa
altatt..
0J0tt ot1l,at!zE{a
Itmlaa
O.tt,,.oSrtl artEaa
'.rur{a
0lraa o2't6 a70E{a
f . qtlc.l odfr. co.6Lld.
fiflrilrtrU(ln.ttcxmtn.tt - Engf,.tr Untt
fitltrltlfl(trtrD[mmHoxmln.ll . LAb.{-]br!UnIr
[mlcnfuttnn xsx]tfi.U - f,rllc lhttr
0.!
{.c
OG
{.0t
{.o
0.r
{.ra
ota
ota
{.tt
COlLl.-r.
Page 62 of 70
DI 7U ,al ru
,Lt ,at 7aa ,tt It
,&!?aa t&ro
lZO ,at ,L'7B ru
7U ,a-t It
,1,,43 ,u ru Il
ru ,u ,u zt [o
,2,,L',a-t ,t.,t-r
'i
L
Efr,r!@raittarco,lB . lBE.CLtld,,Dnrri.l{C 27104 . elt$Ua . ffi.cilnfrt.d
GP043AS-036878-RT- 1557
Appendix D.3
Instrumental Test Method QA/QC Data
GP043AS-036878-RT- 1 5 57 Page 63 of 70
,e"r\ AIY,HI+H[H
Prolsct Number
Cllcm/redhv
SourccAocetlm
2out/o3r4
O1 Cellbntlon Cyllndcr lD Ges Velu.Rcrponse %Enorlt2%l
zf,,to
g. e1t/o,ol
Mld rt4t L'|'lo,\c lol1.1
' Span I Qo 5rr3(Zo,et O '1P. nb
CO2 Callbratlon Cyllnder tD GrVafue Rreponco %Enorl*2%l
Zero O,*Ctoo
Mrd tltlte 1l 1,a5*7,9
Span 4ttu57151,11, bq t1.7 0
G P043AS-036878-RT- 1 557 Page 64 of 70
AiIgas.
an AirLiquido company
Airgas Specialty Gases
Airgas USA LLC
525 North Industrial Ioop Road
Tooele, UT 84o74
Airgas.com
Part Number:
Cylinder Number:
Laboratory:
PGVP Number:
Gas Code:
1s3402396222-1
151.0 CF
2015 PS|G
590
Apr 05,2022
Certification performed in accordance with "EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards (May 20'12)" document EPA
600/R-12/531, using the assay procedures listed. Analytical Methodology does not require correclion for analytical interference. This cylinder has a total analytical
uncertainty as stated below with a confidence level of 95%. There are no significant impurities which affscl the use of this calibration mixture. All concentrations are on a
mole/mole basis unless otheMise noted. The results relat€ only to the items tested. The report shall not be reproduced except in full without approval of the laboratory. Do
Triad Data Available Upon Request
Sioneftrra an fila
Approved for Release
GP043AS-036878-RT- 1557
Page 1 of 'l
Page 65 of 70
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Grade of Product: EPA PROTOCOL STAMARI)
E03N180E15A63W3
cc741675
124 -Tooele (SAP) - UT
872022
CO2,02,BALN
Expiration Date:
Reference Number:
Cylinder Volume:
Cylinder Pressure:
Valve Outlet:
Certification Date:
Apr 05.2030
NOt USe I nrs (;ylrnder below 100 Le.
Component Requested
Concentration
ANALITICAL RESULTS
Actual ProtocolGoncentration Method
TotalRelative
Uncertainty
Assay
Dates
CARBON DIOXIDE
OXYGEN
NITROGEN
9.500 7o
10.50 %
Balance
9.658 o/o
10.36 o/o
G1
G1
+l- 0.7o/o NIST Traceable
+l- 0.8o/o NIST Traceable
03t29t2022
04t05t2022
CALIBRATION STAIVDARDS
Type Lot lD Cyllnder No Concentration Uncertainty Expiration Date
NTRM
NTRM
1 9060404
98051010
6162650Y
SG9161286BAL
1 1.105 Yo CARBON DIOXIDE/NITROGEN
12.05 o/o OXYGEN/N ITROGEN
0.6%
O.7o/"
Dec04,2025
Dec 14,2023
I nstrumenUMakeliiodel
ANALYTICAL EQTIIPMENT
Analytical Principle Last Multipoint Calibration
Nicolet iS50 AUP2010228 CO2 HCO2
Horiba MPA-510 W603MM58 02
FTIR
02 Paramaqnetic (Mason)
Mu 09,2022
Mar 28,2O22
Airgas.
an Air Uquide company
Airgas Specialty Gases
Airgas USA LLC
525 North Industrial loop Road
Tooele, I/I 84o74
Airgas.com
Part Number:
Cylinder Number:
Laboratory:
PGVP Number:
Gas Code:
Reference Number:
Cylinder Volume:
Cylinder Pressure:
Valve Outlet:
Certification Date:
153402833621-1
158.0 CF
2015 PS|G
590
Sep 07, 2023
Expiration Date: Sep 07.203i
Certification performed in accordance with 'EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards (May 2012)" document EPA
600/R-12/531, using the assay procedures listad. Analytical Methodology does not require correction for analytical interference. This cylinder has a total analytical
uncertainty as stated below with a confidence level of 95%. There are no significant impurities which affect the use of this calibration mixture. All concentrations are on a
mole/mole basis unless otheMise noted. The results relate only to the items tested. The report shall not be reproduced except in full without approval of the laboratory. Do
Not Use This Cylinder belo\il 100 osio. i.e. 0.7 meoaDascals.
Triad Data Available Upon Request
Sionature on file
Approved for Release
GP043AS-036878-RT- 1 5 57
Page I of I
Page 66 of 70
CERTIFICATE OF AIYALYSIS
Grade of Product: EPA PROTOCOL STAIYDARD
E03Nt61E15A0287
xc0057138
124 - Tooele (SAP) - UT
872023
CO2,02,BALN
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Actual ProtocolConcentration Method
CARBON DIOXIDE
OXYGEN
NITROGEN
18.00 7o
21.00 Yo
Balance
17 .64 o/o
20.96 o/o
+l- 0.9o/o NIST Traceable
+l- 0.5o/o NIST Traceable
G1
G1
09t0712023
09t07t2023
CALIBRATION STAIVDARDS
Lot !D Cylinder No Concentration Uncertainty Expiration Date
24.04 olo CARBON DIOXIDE/NITROGEN
22.53 o/o OXYGEN/N ITROGEN
0.6%
0.40/o
NTRM
NTRM
1 3060802
09061434
cc415397
cc282492
ANALYTICAL EQINPMENT
Horiba VIA-510 SV4MEUTJ CO2
Horiba MPA-510 W603MM58 02
Appendix D.4
Accred itation I nformation / Certifications
$Ae
Accredited Air Emission Testing Body
A2LA hos occrediled
MONTROSE AIR QUALITY SERVICES
ln recognilion of the successful completion of the joini A2LA ond Stock Tesiing Accrediiotion Council (STAC)
evoluotion process, this loborotory is occredited to perform testing octivities in complionce with
ASTM D7036:2004 - Stondord Proctice for Competence of Air Emission Testing Bodies.
Presented this 27th doy of Februory 2024.
Vice President, Accrediiotion Services
For the Accredilotion Council
Certificote Number 3925.0 I
Volid to Februory 28,2026
This accreditation program is not includ.ed undcr the A2LA ILAC Mutual Recognitian Arrangenent.
GP043A5-036878-RT-1557
Americon Associofio n f or Loborotory Accreditofion
Page 68 of 70
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
David Smith
This document certifies that this individual has passed a comprehensive examination and is now a
Qualified lndividual (Ql) as defined in Section 8.3 of ASTM D7036-04 for the following method(s):
Source Evaluation Society Group 1: EPA Manual Gas Volume and Flow Measurements and lsokinetic
P afticul ate Sa m pl i ng Method s
Certificate N umber: 043-2020-2
4*/r*lz DATE OF ISSUE: 10116120
Tate Strickler, VP - Quality Systems
DATE OFEXPIMTION: 10115125
mmgNTmpJ
Page 69 of 70
This is the Last Page of This Document
If you have any questions, please contact one of the following
individuals by email or phone.
Name: Craig Kormylo
Title: District Manager
Region: USA - Stack - Great PIains - Operations
Email: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
Name: Glen Capra
Title: Vice President
Region: USA - Stack
Email : [e-mail]
Phone: (5t2) 772-6450
_s.lH DEPARTMET.IT oFENVIRONMENTAT QUAUTY
APR 2 3 '2024
DIVISION OF AIR QUALITV
GP043AS-036878-RT- 1557 Page 70 of 70
Yr*sl'flF_gs"r
Huntington Power Plant
6 miles west of Huntington, Utah on Hwy. j I
P.O. Box 680
Huntington, utqh 84528
March 27,2024
Mr. Bryce Bird, Director
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quali$
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144820
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
UTAH DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ilivtstoN
- : ,) '1
OF AIR QUALITY'
RE: Pacificorp, Huntington Plant - MATS PM LEE 3-Year Gompliance Demonstration Deviation
Report, Boiler Unit 2, Operating Permit 1501001005
Attn: Harold Burge
ln response to the March 26,2024, phone call notification made to Mr. Harold Burge by Tom \Mscomb
and RussellWillson, and in accordance with Operating Permit 1501001005 - provision 1.S.2.c, and Utah
Administrative Code (UAC) R307-41s€a(3)(c)(ii), the following deviation report is submitted:
1. List the dates that the deviation occurred/will occur:
Start: April 1, 2024. End: April 11, 2024.
2. Permit condition for which deviation occurred:
Title V Permit 11.8.3.f.1(dX1\. "Filterable PM: The permittee shallconduct a peiormance test at
least once every 36 calendar months to demonstrate continued LEE sfafus." 40 CFR 63.10006
(b) " For the affected units meeting the LEE requirements of 63.1 0005(h), you must repeat the
performance test once every 3 years (once every year for Hg) according to Table 5 and
63.10007. Should subsequent emr.ssions testing resu/fs show the unit does not meet the LEE
eligibiltty requirements, LEE sfafus is /osf. lf this should occur:"
3. Describe the deviation that occurred:
The MATS LEE PM 3-year recertification demonstration for Unit 2 at the Huntington Plant was
scheduled for March 20,2024. However, due to the failure of the stack elevator, the test was
postponed. The elevator failed to operate safely to the 300' level of the stack where testing is
required. The elevator has since been repaired but efforts to re-schedule the test by the end of
March were unsuccessful. The previous MATS PM LEE demonstration was complete on March
10,2021.
4. Was the deviation due to an "upset condition" as defined in Section ll of the permit?
"Upset Conditions" are not defined in Operating Permit 1501001005.
5. Describe the probable cause of deviation:
The deviation will be due to not completing the Unit 2 - 3-year recertification test for MATS LEE
PM before 36 months as required by the Title V Permit condition 11.8.3.f.1(d)(1) and 40 CFR
62.10006(b). The compliance deadline date is March 31,2024. Due to the postponement of the
scheduled test, the requirement will not be met until April 11, 2024.
6. Describe any corrective actions or preventive measures taken:
The Huntington Plant contracts with McDonough Elevator to maintain the stack elevators on a
quarterly schedule. The Quarter 1, 2024 maintenance was performed in January 2024 as per
McDonough's schedule availability. There were no major repairs made during that visit and the
elevator was fully operational until the day of the stack test. We have requested that McDonough
Elevator try to schedule the Q1 maintenance work to be completed in February, as opposed to
January, to have the maintenance work completed closer to the beginning of stack testing
operations and improve the odds of having the elevators operational and available.
I am authorized to make this submission on behalf of the owners and operators of the affected source or
affected units for which the submission is made. I certify under penal$ of law that I have personally
examined, and am familiar with, the statements and information submitted in this document and all its
attachments. Based on my inquiry of those individuals with primary responsibility for obtaining the
information, I certify that the statements and information are to the best of my knowledge and belief true,
accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false statements
and information, or omitting statements and information, including the possibility of fine or imprisonment.
Should you have any questions regarding this information, please contact Terry Guthrie, Environmental
Manager Hunter, and Huntington Power Plants at [phone].
Managing Director Hunter and Huntington Power Plants
cc: Terry Guthrie - Environmental Manager, Hunter and Huntington Plants
Scarlet Jackson - NTO 210
Tom Wiscomb - NTO 210
Brett Shakespear - NTO 210
Russ Willson - Huntington Plant Files
Source Information
Division of Air Quality
Compliance Demonstration
Source Information
Company Name PacifiCorp Huntington - Unit No. 1
Company Contact:Tom Wiscomb
Contact Phone No.801-220-2373
Source Designation:Unit No. 1
Test & Review Dates
Test Date: 3/19/2024
Review Date: 5/1/2024 Tabs Are Shown
Observer:
Reviewer:Paul Morris
Particulate Emission Limits
lbs/MMBtu lbs/hr gr/dscf
0.030 74.000
Emission Rates - "Front Half"
lbs/MMBtu lbs/hr gr/dscf
0.0106 49.4797 0.0045
Test Information
Stack_I.D._inches As ft^2 Y Dl H @ Cp Pbar Pq (static)Dn
323.30 570.08 0.9905 1.7651 0.84 23.79 -4.2 0.245
Contractor Information
Contracting Company: Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC
Contact: Cheyney Guymon
Phone No.: 801-794-2950
Project No.:
1840
Circular
10100
9780
9860
9190
8710
8710
8710
10540
10640
11950
320
10610
10200
10390
1970
1800
1910
1420
1040
1190
1250
F factor usedF factors for Coal, Oil, and Gas
Anthrocite 2
Lignite
Natural
Propane
Butane
COAL
OIL
GAS
Bituminous 2
Fd Fw Fc
scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu
O2
CO2
lbs/MMBtu
Page 1
Summary
Division of Air Quality
Reference Methods 5 - TSP
Compliance Demonstration of
PacifiCorp Huntington - Unit No. 1
Testing Results Lab Data - grams collected
Test Date 3/19/2024 3/19/2024 3/19/2024 3/19/2024 Lab Data Probe Filter Back
Circular Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Run 1 0.0236 0.0078 0.0035
As ft^2 570.08 570.08 570.08 Run 2 0.0188 0.0065 0.0055
Pbar 23.79 23.79 23.79 Run 3 0.0146 0.0047 0.0056
Pq (static)-4.20 -4.20 -4.20 Run 4
Ps 23.48 23.48 23.48
Avg. Ts F 108.50 110.33 109.58 Front Half Emissions Summary
CO2 - FCO2 11.70 10.50 11.50 Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Avg.
O2 7.90 8.70 8.00 gr./dscf 0.0056 0.0046 0.0034 0.0045
N2+C 80.40 80.80 80.50 lbs/hr 62.1223 48.9494 37.3673 49.4797
Md 30.19 30.03 30.16 lbs/MMBtu 1.261E-02 1.141E-02 7.880E-03 0.0106
Ms 28.91 28.68 28.85
Y 0.99 0.99 0.99
Cp 0.84 0.84 0.84 Total Emissions Summary w/back half condensable
Vm cf 108.62 109.08 110.25 Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Avg.
Vlc 214.00 238.00 221.90 gr./dscf 0.0062 0.0056 0.0044 0.0054
AVG. Tm F 66.42 73.00 73.96 lbs/hr 69.0468 59.5906 48.2097 58.9490
Vm std 86.35 85.63 86.40 lbs/MMBtu 1.401E-02 1.390E-02 1.017E-02 0.0127
Vw std 10.07 11.20 10.44
Bws 0.10 0.12 0.11
S Bws 0.11 0.11 0.11
Avg. Sqrt
Dlp 0.88 0.86 0.86
Vs 57.83 56.74 56.95 F factor used
scfm wet 1441851.72 1410144.32 1417242.13 1840
acfm 1978143.85 1940881.94 1948086.01
Qsd dscfh 77473209.66 75134986.73 75863296.20
# Sample
Points 12.00 12.00 12.00
Dn 0.245 0.245 0.245
An 3.27E-04 3.27E-04 3.27E-04
Start Time 0:00 0:00 0:00
End Time 0:00 0:00 0:00
Total Test
time 120.00 120.00 120.00
Time @ point 10.00 10.00 10.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
110.00
120.00
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47
%
I
s
o
k
i
n
e
t
i
c
Points
Run 1 PxP Isokinetic
80.00
90.00
100.00
110.00
120.00
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47
%
I
s
o
k
i
n
e
t
i
c
Sample Points
Run 2 PxP Isokinetic
80.00
90.00
100.00
110.00
120.00
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47
%
I
s
o
k
i
n
e
t
i
c
Sample Points
Run 3 PxP Isokinetic
O2
CO2
lbs/MMBtu
80.00
90.00
100.00
110.00
120.00
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47
Sample Points
Run 4 PxP Isokinetic
Page 1
Run 1
PacifiCorp Huntington - Unit No. 1 Flow & Moisture Test Date 3/19/2024
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg. Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
570.08 23.79 -4.20 23.48 109 11.70 7.90 80.40 30.19 28.91
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc Avg. Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 0.1062
0.9905 0.84 108.624 214.00 66.42 86.346 10.073 0.1045 0.1062 0.999
Avg. Sqrt
Dlp Vs scfm wet acfm Qsd dscfh
# Sample
Points Dn
Total Test
time (minutes)
Time @ point
(minutes)Avg. Dlh
0.880 57.83 1,441,852 1,978,144 7.75E+07 12 0.245 120 10.00 2.166667
TRUE
Point No.Meter (cf) dl "p" dl "h" ts F tm F (in) tm F (out) Imp. Liquid Collected
1 247.693 0.75 2.10 108 60 58 Wt. (Final) Wt. (Initial) lc
2 257.850 0.76 2.10 108 64 60 439.10 355.80 83.3
3 265.270 0.83 2.30 108 67 62 664.80 599.10 65.7
4 274.446 0.75 2.10 109 65 63 783.80 747.40 36.4
5 283.500 0.83 2.30 108 68 66 961.70 933.10 28.6
6 292.820 0.81 2.30 109 70 67 0.0
7 302.153 0.74 2.00 110 69 65
8 311.060 0.77 2.20 108 69 66 Isokinetics 97.1
9 320.100 0.80 2.20 108 73 66 Test Date 3/19/2024
10 329.244 0.70 2.00 108 69 67 Start Time enter
11 338.020 0.78 2.20 108 71 70 End Time
12 347.155 0.78 2.20 110 71 68 Run 1
13 356.317
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Page 1
Run 2
PacifiCorp Huntington - Unit No. 1 Flow & Moisture Test Date 3/19/2024
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg. Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
570.08 23.79 -4.20 23.48 110 10.50 8.70 80.80 30.03 28.68
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc Avg. Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 0.1120
0.9905 0.84 109.081 238.00 73 85.630 11.203 0.1157 0.1120 0.999
Avg. Sqrt
Dlp Vs scfm wet acfm Qsd dscfh
# Sample
Points Dn
Total Test
time (minutes)
Time @ point
(minutes)Avg. Dlh
0.859 56.74 1,410,144 1,940,882 7.51E+07 12 0.245 120 10.00 2.13
TRUE
Point No.Meter (cf) dl "p" dl "h" ts F tm F (in) tm F (out) Imp. Liquid Collected
1 360.082 0.68 2.00 112.0 66.0 69.0 Wt. (Final) Wt. (Initial) lc
2 368.860 0.71 2.00 110.0 72.0 74.0 603.40 493.90 109.5
3 377.570 0.74 2.10 111.0 75.0 79.0 657.60 605.10 52.5
4 386.525 0.72 2.10 110.0 75.0 71.0 749.40 707.40 42.0
5 395.280 0.74 2.10 110.0 75.0 69.0 971.30 937.30 34.0
6 404.460 0.75 2.20 110.0 77.0 70.0 0.0
7 413.900 0.72 2.10 110.0 74.0 69.0
8 422.860 0.74 2.10 110.0 75.0 71.0 Isokinetics 99.7
9 432.005 0.78 2.30 111.0 77.0 70.0 Test Date 3/19/2024
10 441.451 0.74 2.10 110.0 76.0 73.0 Start Time
11 450.420 0.75 2.20 110.0 75.0 71.0 End Time
12 459.660 0.78 2.30 110.0 76.0 73.0 Run 2
13 469.163
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Page 1
Run 3
PacifiCorp Huntington - Unit No. 1 Flow & Moisture Test Date 3/19/2024
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg. Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
570.08 23.79 -4.20 23.48 110 11.50 8.00 80.50 30.16 28.85
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc Avg. Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 0.1096
0.9905 0.84 110.247 221.90 74 86.398 10.445 0.1079 0.1096 0.999
Avg. Sqrt
Dlp Vs scfm wet acfm Qsd dscfh
# Sample
Points Dn
Total Test
time (minutes)
Time @ point
(minutes)Avg. Dlh
0.865 56.95 1,417,242 1,948,086 7.59E+07 12 0.245 120 10.00 2.17
TRUE
Point No.Meter (cf) dl "p" dl "h" ts F tm F (in) tm F (out) Imp. Liquid Collected
1 469.425 0.74 2.10 109.0 69.0 70.0 Wt. (Final) Wt. (Initial) lc
2 478.500 0.73 2.10 109.0 74.0 72.0 445.2 355.8 89.4
3 487.490 0.76 2.20 110.0 76.0 70.0 645.6 600.0 45.6
4 496.660 0.71 2.10 109.0 76.0 78.0 838.4 782.1 56.3
5 506.050 0.78 2.30 111.0 75.0 76.0 927.8 897.2 30.6
6 515.510 0.79 2.30 111.0 77.0 73.0 0.0
7 525.055 0.71 2.10 109.0 74.0 70.0
8 534.080 0.75 2.20 109.0 76.0 71.0 Isokinetics 99.2
9 543.390 0.77 2.20 109.0 78.0 71.0 Test Date 3/19/2024
10 552.656 0.70 2.00 110.0 78.0 71.0 Start Time
11 561.620 0.77 2.20 110.0 77.0 72.0 End Time
12 570.540 0.77 2.20 109.0 78.0 73.0 Run 3
13 579.672
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Page 1