DAQ-2024-004336

1

DAQC-1347-23
Site ID 10346 (B4)

MEMORANDUM

TO: STACK TEST FILE – KENNECOTT UTAH COPPER – Smelter

THROUGH: Harold Burge, Major Source Compliance Section Manager

FROM: Paul Morris, Environmental Scientist

DATE: December 14, 2023

SUBJECT: Source: Holman Boiler - SME026 and Smelter Auxiliary Superheated
Steam Boiler Stack - SME030
Contact: Sean Daly: 801-204-2563
Location: Kennecott Smelter Facility, Magna, Salt Lake County, UT
Test Contractor: Alliance Technical Group.
FRS ID #: UT0000004903500030
Permit/AO#: Title V Operating Permit 3500030004, dated September 18,
2020, and DAQE-AN103460061-22, dated June 23, 2022
Action Code: 3A
Subject: Review of Stack Test Reports dated December 4, 2023

On December 4, 2023, Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) received a test report for the Kennecott Utah
Copper Holman Boiler and Smelter Auxiliary Superheated Steam Boiler Stacks. Testing was performed
on October 4 and 5, 2023, to demonstrate compliance with the emission limits found in AO Condition
II.B.1.a and Permit Conditions II.B.22.a and II.B.23.c. The DAQ-calculated test results are:

Source Test Date Test Method Pollutant Result Limit

SME026 10/5/2023 M7E NOx 7.2 lb/hr 14.0 lb/hr

SME030 10/4/2023 M7E NOx 2.10 lb/hr 4.94 lb/hr

DEVIATIONS: None reported.

CONCLUSION: Kennecott Utah Copper appears to be in compliance with the applicable
conditions of the Title V operating permit at the time of this test.

RECOMMENDATION: Kennecott Utah Copper should be considered in compliance with the
emission limits listed.

HPV: No violations occurred.

ATTACHMENT: Stack test report dated December 4, 2023, DAQ spreadsheets and email

6 , 3
Holman NOx
Reference Methods 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, & 19
Source Information
Company Name Kennecott
Company Contact:Jenny Esker
Contact Phone No.801-569-6494
Stack Designation:Holman Boiler SME026
Test & Review Dates
Test Date:10/5/2023 &
Review Date: 12/12/2023
Observer:Unobserved
Reviewer:Paul Morris
Emission Limits Emission Rates
SO2 NOX CO SO2 NOX CO
lbs./MMBtu
lbs./hr. 14.0 7.154
ppm
Percent
%O2 Correction as a whole #
Test Information Heat Input
Stack I.D. inches As ft^2 Y Dl H @ Cp Pbar Pq (static)
fuel flow rate
(Btu/hr.)
Heat Input
(Btu/hr.)
84.00 38.485 1.0500 1.685 0.84 25.94 0.02
Contractor Information
Contact: Charles Horton
Contracting Company: Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Address: 3683 W 2270 S, Suite E West Valley City, UT 84120
Phone No.: [phone]
Project No.:

Division of Air Quality
Instrumental Reference Methods - Gaseous Measurements
Round
Method 19 - F factors for Coal, Oil, and Gas
Fd Fw Fc
scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu
Diluent
F factor used
O2
CO2
Anthrocite 2
Bituminous 2
Lignite
Natural
Propane
Butane
10100
COAL
OIL
GAS
9780
9860
9190
8710
8710
8710
10540
10640
11950
320
10610
10200
10390
1970
1800
1910
1420
1040
1190
1250
Wet CEM
Correct For O2
CO2 Interference w/CO
Yes
Yes
Yes
Holman NOx
Division of Air Quality
NSPS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification Test - CEMS Certification
Kennecott
Holman Boiler SME026
Average Emission
Dry SO2 NOX CO
lbs./MMbtu Average % concentration
lbs./hr.7.15 CO2 O2
ppm or % 36.02 9.75 3.40
Run 1 Enter O2 or CO2
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 4.486E-06
lbs./hr.7.61 9.46 3.52
ppm or %37.55 9.45 3.64
Run 2
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 4.230E-06
lbs./hr.6.95 9.86 3.38
ppm or %35.41 9.45 3.52 Raw Value
Run 3
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 4.194E-06
lbs./hr.6.90 9.92 3.28
ppm or %35.11 9.99 3.42 Raw Value
Run 4
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm or %Raw Value
Run 5
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm or %Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
O2
CO2
Clear
lbs./MMBTU
Holman NOx
Calibration Error Test
Test Date October 5, 2023 O2
CS - Cal. Span 24.00
Units %
Cylinder No. Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 -0.01 0.01 0.04% Passed Cal.
EB0093372 07/20/29 Mid-level 12.00 11.99 0.01 0.04% Passed Cal.
RR03252 10/19/29 High-level 24.00 24.01 0.01 0.04% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of CS - Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.00%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date October 5, 2023 CO2
CS - Cal. Span 23.70
Units %
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.380% Passed Cal.
EB0093372 07/20/29 Mid-level 11.85 11.50 0.35 1.477% Passed Cal.
RR03252 10/19/29 High-level 23.70 23.84 0.14 0.591% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.00%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date SO2
CS - Cal. Span
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level
Mid-level
High-level
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level
100% of Cal. Span High-level
Test Date October 5, 2023 NOx
CS - Cal. Span 100.00
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.40 0.40 0.400% Passed Cal.
EB0085549 11/21/24 Mid-level 50.00 51.79 1.79 1.790% Passed Cal.
High-level 100.00 99.97 0.03 0.030% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.00%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date CO
CS - Cal. Span
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level
Mid-level
High-level
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level
100% of Cal. Span High-level
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Holman NOx
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
Kennecott
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Holman Boiler SME026
CS Calibration Span 100.00 23.70 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % % Unprotected
CV - Cylinder Value: SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 50.00 11.85 12.00
High-Level 100.00 23.70 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 50.0%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CDir CMA 50.00 11.85 12.00
Calibration Error Test
Cs - Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.40 0.09 -0.01
Mid-Level 51.79 11.50 11.99
High-Level 99.97 23.84 24.01
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 51.79 11.50 11.99
Low-Level 0.40% 0.38% 0.04%
ppmdv Difference 0.4 0.09 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 1.79% 1.48% 0.04%
ppmdv Difference 1.79 0.35 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.03% 0.59% 0.04%
ppmdv Difference 0.03 0.14 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 1.00 0.20 0.20 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.60% TRUE 0.46% 0.88%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.6 TRUE 0.11 0.21
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 48.10 11.80 11.90
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 3.69% TRUE 1.27% 0.37%
Difference TRUE 3.69 TRUE 0.30 0.09
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:10/5/2023 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
36.6 9.5 3.6 CO
0.0% 36.6% 0.0% 39.9% 15.2% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.90 0.10 0.20 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.50% TRUE 0.04% 0.88%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.5 TRUE 0.0 0.2
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 48.60 11.80 11.90
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 3.19% TRUE 1.27% 0.37%
Difference TRUE 3.2 TRUE 0.3 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.10% TRUE 0.42% 0.00% Drift
Difference TRUE 0.1 TRUE 0.1 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.50% TRUE 0.00% 0.00%
Difference TRUE 0.5 TRUE 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Holman Boiler SME026 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
38.485 25.94 0.02 25.94 366 9.46 3.52 87.02 29.65 27.65
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 13.2167
1.0500 0.84 35.502 144.10 60 32.803 6.783 0.1713 0.9990 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs
(ft/sec.)Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
0.3460 26.650 2,047,586 61,538 1,696,744.10 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.12 0.346 366 62 64 816 697 119.4
2 62 62 730 720 10.1
3 62 60 690 687 3.5
4 63 56 995 984 11.1
5 63 56
6 63 56
7 63 56
8 64 55
9 64 54
10 64 54
11 64 54
12 65 54
13 65 53
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
CO Calibration Gas
Failed Bias Dialog
Holman NOx
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
Kennecott
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Holman Boiler SME026
CS Calibration Span 100.00 23.70 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 50.00 11.85 12.00
High-Level 100.00 23.70 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 50.0%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 50.00 11.85 12.00
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.40 0.09 -0.01
Mid-Level 51.79 11.50 11.99
High-Level 99.97 23.84 24.01
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 51.79 11.50 11.99
Low-Level 0.40% 0.38% 0.04%
ppmdv Difference 0.4 0.09 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 1.79% 1.48% 0.04%
ppmdv Difference 1.79 0.35 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.03% 0.59% 0.04%
ppmdv Difference 0.03 0.14 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.90 0.10 0.20 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.50% TRUE 0.04% 0.88%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.5 TRUE 0.01 0.21
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 48.60 11.80 11.90
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 3.19% TRUE 1.27% 0.37%
Difference TRUE 3.19 TRUE 0.3 0.09
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:10/5/2023 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
34.6 9.9 3.5 CO
0.0% 34.6% 0.0% 41.7% 14.7% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.70 0.20 0.20 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.30% TRUE 0.46% 0.88%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.3 TRUE 0.1 0.2
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 48.40 11.90 12.00
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 3.39% TRUE 1.69% 0.04%
Difference TRUE 3.4 TRUE 0.4 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.20% TRUE 0.42% 0.00% Response Spec.
Difference TRUE 0.2 TRUE 0.1 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.20% TRUE 0.42% 0.33%
Difference TRUE 0.2 TRUE 0.1 0.1
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Holman Boiler SME026 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
38.49 25.94 0.02 25.94 365 9.86 3.38 86.76 29.71 27.81
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 13.1500
1.0500 0.84 36.118 135.80 66 32.991 6.392 0.1623 0.9990 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
0.3320 25.50 1,960,178 58,882 1,642,029.82 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.11 0.332 365 73 62 991 884 106.5
2 73 62 770 760 9.4
3 73 62 643 638 5.3
4 74 59 971 957 14.6
5 74 59
6 74 55
7 74 55
8 75 55
9 75 55
10 75 55
11 76 56
12 76 56
13 76 57
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
Holman NOx
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
Kennecott
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Holman Boiler SME026
CS Calibration Span 100.00 23.70 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 50.00 11.85 12.00
High-Level 100.00 23.70 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 50.0%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 50.00 11.85 12.00
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.40 0.09 -0.01
Mid-Level 51.79 11.50 11.99
High-Level 99.97 23.84 24.01
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 51.79 11.50 11.99
Low-Level 0.40% 0.38% 0.04%
ppmv Difference 0.4 0.09 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 1.79% 1.48% 0.04%
ppmv Difference 1.79 0.35 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.03% 0.59% 0.04%
ppmv Difference 0.03 0.14 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.70 0.20 0.20 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.30% TRUE 0.46% 0.88%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.3 TRUE 0.11 0.21
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 48.40 11.90 12.00
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 3.39% TRUE 1.69% 0.04%
Difference TRUE 3.39 TRUE 0.4 0.01
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:10/5/2023 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
34.4 10.0 3.4 CO
0.0% 34.4% 0.0% 42.2% 14.3% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.90 0.10 0.20 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.50% TRUE 0.04% 0.88%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.5 TRUE 0.0 0.2
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 48.90 11.90 11.90
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 2.89% TRUE 1.69% 0.37%
Difference TRUE 2.9 TRUE 0.4 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.20% TRUE 0.42% 0.00% Response Spec.
Difference TRUE 0.2 TRUE 0.1 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.50% TRUE 0.00% 0.33%
Difference TRUE 0.5 TRUE 0.0 0.1
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Holman Boiler SME026 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
38.49 25.94 0.02 25.94 365 9.92 3.28 86.79 29.72 27.85
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 13.1500
1.0500 0.84 35.724 132.10 64 32.771 6.218 0.1595 0.9990 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
0.3320 25.48 1,958,641 58,836 1,646,277.17 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.11 0.332 365 7l 64 948 827 121.4
2 7l 59 774 770 4.4
3 71 55 645 643 1.2
4 72 55 976 971 5.1
5 72 55
6 73 54 FT```
7 73 54
8 73 54
9 74 54
10 74 55
11 74 55
12 74 56
13 74 56
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
Renetech NOx
Reference Methods 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, & 19
Source Information
Company Name Kennecott
Company Contact:Jenny Esker
Contact Phone No.801-569-6494
Stack Designation:Rentech Boiler SME030
Test & Review Dates
Test Date:10/4/2023 &
Review Date: 12/12/2023
Observer:Unobserved
Reviewer:Paul Morris
Emission Limits Emission Rates
SO2 NOX CO SO2 NOX CO
lbs./MMBtu
lbs./hr. 4.94 2.10
ppm
Percent
%O2 Correction as a whole #
Test Information Heat Input
Stack I.D. inches As ft^2 Y Dl H @ Cp Pbar Pq (static)
fuel flow rate
(Btu/hr.)
Heat Input
(Btu/hr.)
54.00 15.904 1.0500 1.685 0.84 25.81 0.02
Contractor Information
Contact: Charles Horton
Contracting Company: Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Address: 3683 W 2270 S, Suite E West Valley City, UT 84120
Phone No.: [phone]
Project No.:

Round
Division of Air Quality
Instrumental Reference Methods - Gaseous Measurements
Method 19 - F factors for Coal, Oil, and Gas
Fd Fw Fc
scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu
Diluent
F factor used
O2
CO2
Anthrocite 2
Bituminous 2
Lignite
Natural
Propane
Butane
10100
COAL
OIL
GAS
9780
9860
9190
8710
8710
8710
10540
10640
11950
320
10610
10200
10390
1970
1800
1910
1420
1040
1190
1250
Wet CEM
Correct For O2
CO2 Interference w/CO
Yes
Yes
Yes
Renetech NOx
Division of Air Quality
NSPS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification Test - CEMS Certification
Kennecott
Rentech Boiler SME030
Average Emission
Dry SO2 NOX CO
lbs./MMbtu Average % concentration
lbs./hr.2.10 CO2 O2
ppm or % 13.65 9.83 3.31
Run 1 Enter O2 or CO2
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 1.636E-06
lbs./hr.1.78 9.85 3.30
ppm or %13.69 9.86 3.36
Run 2
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 1.636E-06
lbs./hr.2.26 9.80 3.33
ppm or %13.69 9.86 3.39 Raw Value
Run 3
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 1.619E-06
lbs./hr.2.25 9.83 3.31
ppm or %13.56 9.88 3.37 Raw Value
Run 4
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm or %Raw Value
Run 5
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm or %Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
O2
CO2
Clear
lbs./MMBTU
Renetech NOx
Calibration Error Test
Test Date October 4, 2023 O2
CS - Cal. Span 24.00
Units %
Cylinder No. Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 -0.02 0.02 0.08% Passed Cal.
EB0093372 07/20/29 Mid-level 10.98 10.96 0.02 0.08% Passed Cal.
RR03252 10/19/29 High-level 24.00 23.96 0.04 0.17% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of CS - Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 45.75%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date October 4, 2023 CO2
CS - Cal. Span 23.70
Units %
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.591% Passed Cal.
EB0093372 07/20/29 Mid-level 10.76 10.85 0.09 0.380% Passed Cal.
RR03252 10/19/29 High-level 23.70 23.77 0.07 0.295% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 45.40%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date SO2
CS - Cal. Span
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level
Mid-level
High-level
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level
100% of Cal. Span High-level
Test Date October 4, 2023 NOx
CS - Cal. Span 96.20
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.104% Passed Cal.
EB0010852 10/02/29 Mid-level 48.10 48.05 0.05 0.052% Passed Cal.
High-level 96.20 96.37 0.17 0.177% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.00%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date CO
CS - Cal. Span
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level
Mid-level
High-level
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level
100% of Cal. Span High-level
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Renetech NOx
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
Kennecott
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Rentech Boiler SME030
CS Calibration Span 96.20 23.70 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % % Unprotected
CV - Cylinder Value: SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 48.10 10.76 10.98
High-Level 96.20 23.70 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 45.4% 45.8%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CDir CMA 48.10 10.76 10.98
Calibration Error Test
Cs - Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.10 0.14 -0.02
Mid-Level 48.05 10.85 10.96
High-Level 96.37 23.77 23.96
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 48.05 10.85 10.96
Low-Level 0.10% 0.59% 0.08%
ppmdv Difference 0.1 0.14 0.02
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.05% 0.38% 0.08%
ppmdv Difference 0.05 0.09 0.02
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.18% 0.30% 0.17%
ppmdv Difference 0.17 0.07 0.04
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.50 0.20 0.10 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.42% TRUE 0.25% 0.50%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.4 TRUE 0.06 0.12
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 48.90 10.70 10.90
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.88% TRUE 0.63% 0.25%
Difference TRUE 0.85 TRUE 0.15 0.06
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:10/4/2023 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
14.1 9.9 3.4 CO
0.0% 14.7% 0.0% 41.6% 14.0% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.40 0.20 0.10 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.31% TRUE 0.25% 0.50%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.3 TRUE 0.1 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 47.90 10.80 10.90
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.16% TRUE 0.21% 0.25%
Difference TRUE 0.1 TRUE 0.0 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.10% TRUE 0.00% 0.00% Drift
Difference TRUE 0.1 TRUE 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.73% TRUE 0.42% 0.00%
Difference TRUE 1.0 TRUE 0.1 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Rentech Boiler SME030 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
15.904 25.81 0.02 25.81 261 9.85 3.30 86.85 29.71 27.77
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 2.8655
1.0500 0.84 35.205 135.90 61 32.303 6.397 0.1653 0.9990 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs
(ft/sec.)Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
0.5000 36.010 1,302,515 34,362 1,087,218.44 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.25 0.500 261 65 62 872 766 106.4
2 66 59 772 758 14.3
3 66 58 684 678 5.1
4 67 55 975 965 10.1
5 67 53
6 67 53
7 67 52
8 68 51
9 68 51
10 68 51
11 68 51
12 69 52
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
CO Calibration Gas
Failed Bias Dialog
Renetech NOx
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
Kennecott
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Rentech Boiler SME030
CS Calibration Span 96.20 23.70 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 48.10 10.76 10.98
High-Level 96.20 23.70 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 45.4% 45.8%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 48.10 10.76 10.98
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.10 0.14 -0.02
Mid-Level 48.05 10.85 10.96
High-Level 96.37 23.77 23.96
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 48.05 10.85 10.96
Low-Level 0.10% 0.59% 0.08%
ppmdv Difference 0.1 0.14 0.02
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.05% 0.38% 0.08%
ppmdv Difference 0.05 0.09 0.02
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.18% 0.30% 0.17%
ppmdv Difference 0.17 0.07 0.04
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.40 0.20 0.10 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.31% TRUE 0.25% 0.50%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.3 TRUE 0.06 0.12
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 47.90 10.80 10.90
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.16% TRUE 0.21% 0.25%
Difference TRUE 0.15 TRUE 0.05 0.06
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:10/4/2023 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
14.0 9.9 3.4 CO
0.0% 14.6% 0.0% 41.6% 14.1% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.50 0.20 0.10 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.42% TRUE 0.25% 0.50%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.4 TRUE 0.1 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 48.40 10.80 10.90
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.36% TRUE 0.21% 0.25%
Difference TRUE 0.4 TRUE 0.0 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.10% TRUE 0.00% 0.00% Response Spec.
Difference TRUE 0.1 TRUE 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.21% TRUE 0.00% 0.00%
Difference TRUE 0.5 TRUE 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Rentech Boiler SME030 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
15.90 25.81 0.02 25.81 271 9.80 3.33 86.87 29.70 27.77
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 3.3832
1.0500 0.84 35.510 136.20 63 32.449 6.411 0.1650 0.9990 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
0.6400 46.41 1,655,955 44,286 1,382,763.25 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.41 0.640 271 69 65 978 872 105.6
2 69 62 791 772 18.7
3 69 58 687 684 3
4 69 58 984 975 8.9
5 69 55
6 70 55
7 70 54
8 70 54
9 70 54
10 71 53
11 71 54
12 71 55
13 71 56
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
Renetech NOx
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
Kennecott
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Rentech Boiler SME030
CS Calibration Span 96.20 23.70 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 48.10 10.76 10.98
High-Level 96.20 23.70 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 45.4% 45.8%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 48.10 10.76 10.98
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.10 0.14 -0.02
Mid-Level 48.05 10.85 10.96
High-Level 96.37 23.77 23.96
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 48.05 10.85 10.96
Low-Level 0.10% 0.59% 0.08%
ppmv Difference 0.1 0.14 0.02
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.05% 0.38% 0.08%
ppmv Difference 0.05 0.09 0.02
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.18% 0.30% 0.17%
ppmv Difference 0.17 0.07 0.04
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.50 0.20 0.10 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.42% TRUE 0.25% 0.50%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.4 TRUE 0.06 0.12
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 48.40 10.80 10.90
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.36% TRUE 0.21% 0.25%
Difference TRUE 0.35 TRUE 0.05 0.06
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:10/4/2023 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
14.0 9.9 3.4 CO
0.0% 14.5% 0.0% 41.7% 14.0% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.40 0.10 0.10 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.31% TRUE 0.17% 0.50%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.3 TRUE 0.0 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 48.30 10.80 10.90
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.26% TRUE 0.21% 0.25%
Difference TRUE 0.3 TRUE 0.0 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.10% TRUE 0.08% 0.00% Response Spec.
Difference TRUE 0.1 TRUE 0.1 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.10% TRUE 0.00% 0.00%
Difference TRUE 0.1 TRUE 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Rentech Boiler SME030 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
15.90 25.81 0.02 25.81 271 9.83 3.31 86.86 29.71 27.82
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 3.3832
1.0500 0.84 36.987 137.80 63 33.806 6.486 0.1610 0.9990 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
0.6400 46.36 1,654,171 44,239 1,387,882.63 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.41 0.640 271 70 62 884 743 140.7
2 70 60 760 780 -20.3
3 70 55 638 634 4.5
4 70 55 957 944 12.9
5 70 54
6 71 54 FT```
7 71 53
8 71 53
9 71 53
10 72 52
11 72 55
12 72 55
13 72 56
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
R&*T*mrEl trroTire Xsa|Eccaf t.i* Cepf,er, LLC
aToc Daytrsd Pa.lciay t tr t, r ,sorhJddar,Ula4{xts ur'1r I "' ' :ff{-l- OF
.^sl EN\.ilir._,;!rr,,l.i./-ilil eUALiTy
801-569-6331
Dlc _ 1 2C23
^..t-\_^^
rl Do lr usrecl
DIVISION OP AIN QUALITY
Mr. Bryce Bird, Director
Depatsrufi d Erwirmrrentd Or*y
Divisbnof Air(!ldy
P-O- Box144&0
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4820
4Dec2o23 Altt: k Fad lorris
RE: CompfarceTestfuport
Ardtary {nentect} Eofer (Sre030l
TAe V Operalhg Fern*f ilo. 3flIn:Iltr4
lGnnecd lltan Copper- ea# Fdily
Dear Mr, Bird,
Kennecott Utah Copper LLC (Kennecott) performed stack testing on the Rentech
Boiler (SME030) on October 4,2023, as required by Title V Operating Permit No.
3500030003, The testing was conducted following procedures outlined in 40 CFR
60, Appendix A. The summary reporl for the testing procedures test results is
attached for submittal within 60 days of completion of the testing. Results of the
testing demonstrate the Rentech Boiler is in compliance with the permit emission
limits.
Based an hfurmdix ad belef fdrned aflerreaa# iqriy, tre sldenreils
and irformdfrxr ont*pd in fiis dooment ae tsrn, ffirdie, and canpbte
6II}7-frt5d}
Should you have any queslions or need further information regarding the event,
please contact me or Sean Daly at 801-204-2563.
Yors sircerc|y,
0a Lehotf oU
Jerome Dozol
General Manager, Metals
Rjo Tinlo Kenne@tt Utah Coppe( LLC 4700 Daybreak Par}$lay, South Jordan, UT 84009
fll?ECHNISAL GFIOUF
Source Test Report
Rio Tinto Kennecott
4700 Daybreak Parkway
South Jordan, UT 84095
Source Tested: Rentech Boiler SME030
Test Date: October 4,2023
Project No. AST-2023 -3 17 8
Prepared By
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley City, UT 841
UTAH DEPARTMENT OF
ET{\'IRONMENTAL OIJATIW
DEC - 5 2023
DIVISION OF AIR QUALTTY
erffirceTECHNICAL GNSUP Soarce Test Report
Test Program Swnmary
Resulatorv Information
Permil Nos.
Source Information
DAQE-AN103460060-21
Title V Operating Permit 3500030004
Source Name
Rentech Boiler
Contact Information
Source ID
SMEO3O
Target Parameter
NOx
Test Location
Kennecott Utah Copper, LLC
4700 Daybreak Parkway
South Jordan, UT 84009
Jenny Esker
j enny.esker@riotinto. com
(801) s6e-64e4
Sean Daly
sean.daly3 @riotinto.com
(801)204-2s63
Test Company
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley City, UT 84120
Project Manager
Charles Horton
[e-mail]
(3s2) 663-7s68
Field Team Leader
Rob Burton
r [e-mail]
(224)3s8-50ss
QA/QC Manager
Kathleen Shonk
[e-mail]
(8r2) 4s2-478s
Report Coordinator
Sarah Perry
[e-mail]
RTK-Magn4 UT
2 of47
AST-2023-3178 Page i
AIfu Source Tesl Report
C e rt ifi cation StatementTECHNICAL GNOUP
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) has completed the source testing as described in this report. Results
apply only to the source(s) tested and operating condition(s) for the specific test date(s) and time(s) identified within
this report. All results are intended to be considered in their entirety, and Alliance is not responsible for use of less
than the complete test report without written consent. This report shall not be reproduced in full or in part without
written approval from the customer.
To the best of my knowledge and abilities, all information, facts and test data are correct. Data presented in this
report has been checked for completeness and is accurate, error-free and legible. Onsite testing was conducted in
accordance with approved internal Standard Operating Procedures. Any deviations or problems are detailed in the
relevant sections in the test report.
This report is only considered valid once an authorized representative ofAlliance has signed in the space provided
below; any other version is considered draft. This document was prepared in portable document format (.pdf) and
contains pages as identified in the bottom footer of this document.
) ! ;l,7:l* #,.1*r21412023
Charles Horton, QSTI
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
RTK-Magna, UT
3 of47
AST-2023-3 I 78 Page ii
AtfuTECHNICAL GNOUP Source Test Report
Table ofContenu
TABLE OF'CONTENTS
1.3 Site-Specific Test Plan & Notification................... ................ l-l
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and2- Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate..... 3-l
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide.................... ................. 3-1
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 - Moisture Content......... .................... 3-l
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E -Nitrogen Oxides.......... .................. 3-l
3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Gas Dilution System Certification. .................... 3-2
3.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3.{ and 7E................. ............3-2
LIST OF TABLf,S
APPENDICES
Appendix A Sample Calculations
Appendix B Field Data
Appendix C Quality Assurance/Quality Control Data
Appendix D Process Operating/Control System Data
RTK - Magna, UT
4of47
AST-2023-3178 Page iii
5 of47
Atfu Source Test Report
IntroductionTEOHNICAL GNOUP
1.0 Introduction
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by Rio Tinto Kennecott (RTK) to conduct compliance
testing at the Smelter facility located in Magna, Utah. The facility operates under the Utah Department of
Environmental Quality, Division of Air Quality (tlDAQ) Approval Order (AO) DAQE-AN103460060-21 and the
Title V Operating Permit No. 350030004. Testing was conducted to determine the emission rate of nitrogen oxides
(NOx) from the Rentech Boiler designated as SME030.
l.t Facility Description
The smelter facility refines, and processes copper slurry concentrates to produce copper anodes. Many of the
processes involved with the production of copper require steam including the acid plant compressors, the steam
turbine generator, and the anodes refining reduction process.
1.2 Project Team
Personnel involved in this project are identified in the following table.
Table 1-1: ProjectTeam
1.3 Site-Specific Test Plan & Notification
Testing was conducted in accordance with the Site-Specific Test Plan (SSTP) submitted to UDAQ by RTK.
RTK Personnel Sean Daly
Alliance Personnel
Rob Burton
Dillon Brown
Jacob Mclain
RTK-Magna, UT
6of47
AST-2023-3 I 78 Page l-l
7 of47
i_GRCU Source Test Report
Summary ofResults
2.0 Summary of Results
Alliance conducted compliance testing at the Smelter facility located in Magna, Utah on October 4,2023. Testing
consisted of determining the emission rate of NOx from the Rentech Boiler designated as SME030.
Table 2-l provides a summary of the emission testing results with comparisons to the applicable permit limits. Any
difference between the summary results listed in the following table and the detailed results contained in appendices
is due to rounding for presentation.
Table 2-1: Summary of Results
N
itrogen Oxides Data
Concentration, ppmvd
Emission Rate, lb/hr
Permit Limit, lb/hr
Percent of Limit, 7o
13.7t
1.7
t3.71
2.3
13.56
)1
13.66
2.1
4.94
42
RTK-Magna, UT
8of47
AST-2023-3 I 78 Page2-l
9 of47
Affiarce
Source Test Report
Testing Methodology
3.0 Testing Methodology
The enrission testing program was conducted in accordance with the test ntethods listed in Table 3-1. Method
descriptions are provided below while quality assurance/quality control data is provided in Appendix C.
Table 3-I: Source Testing Methodology
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and 2 - Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate
The sarnpling location and number of traverse (sampling) points were selected in accordance with U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method l. To deternrine the rrrinimunr nurnber of traverse points, the upstream and downstream
distances were equated into equivalent diameters and cornpared to Figure l-2 in U.S. EPA Reference Test Method l.
Full velocity traverses were conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 to determine the
average stack gas velocity pressure, static pressure and temperature. The velocity and static pressure Ineasurentent
system consisted of a pitot tube and inclined manorneter. The stack gas temperature was measured with a K-type
thermocouple and pyrometer.
Stack gas velocity pressure and tenrperature readings were recorded during each test run. The data collected was
utilized to calculate the volurnetric flow rate in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2.
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide
The oxygen (Ou) and carbon dioxide (COz) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test
Method 3,A.. Data was collected online and reported in one-rninute avemges. The sarnpling system consisted of a
stainless-steel probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning systern and the identified gas analyzer. The gas
conditioning systern was a non-contact condenser used to relnove moisture frorn the stack gas. If an unheated
Teflon sanrple line was used, then a portable non-contact condensel was placed in the system directly after the
probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon saurple line was used. The quality control nreasures are described in Section 3.6.
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 - Moisture Content
The stack gas moisture conterlt (BWS) was determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4. The
gas conditioning train consisted of a series of chilled impingers. Prior to testing. each inrpinger was filled with a
knownquantityofwaterorsilicagel. Eachimpingerwasanalyzedglavimetricallybeforeandaftereachtestrunon
the sanre balance to deterrnine the anrount ofIrtoisture condensed.
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E - Nitrogen Oxides
The nitrogen oxides (NOx) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E. Data
was collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system consisted of a stainless-steel probe,
RTK - Magna, UT
l0 of47
Parameter U.S. EPA Reference
Test Methods Notes/Remarks
Volumetric Flow Rate t&2 Full Velocity Traverses
Oxygen / Carbon Dioxide 3A Inshumental Analysis
Moisture Content 4 Gravirnetric Analysis
Nitrogen Oxides 7E Instrunrental Analysis
Gas Dilution System Certification 205
AST-2023-3 r 78 Page 3-l
AII
Source Test Report
Testing Methodology
Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system and the identified gas analyzer. The gas conditioning system was a
non-contact condenser used to remove nloisture frorn the stack gas. If an unheated Teflon sanlple line was used,
then a portable non-contact condenser was placed in the systern directly after the probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon
sarnple line was used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.6.
3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Gas Dilution System Ceftification
A calibration gas dilution system field check was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Method 205.
Multiple dilution rates and total gas flow rates were utilized to force the dilution system to perform two dilutions on
each rnass flow controller. The diluted calibration gases were sent directly to the analyzer, and the analyzer response
recorded in an electronic field data sheet. The analyzer respollse agreed within 2o/o of the actual diluted gas
concentration. A second Protocol I calibration gas, with a cylinder concentration within l0% of one of the gas
divider settings described above, was introduced directly to the analyzer, and the analyzer response recorded in an
electronic field data sheet. The cylinder concentration and the analyzer response agreed within 2%o. These steps
were repeated three (3) times. Copies of the Method 205 data can be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality
Control Appendix.
3.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3A and 7E
Cylindercalibration gases used nretEPA Protocol 1(+l-2%) standards. Copies of all calibration gas certificates can
be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix.
Low Level gas was introduced directly to the analyzer. After adjusting the analyzer to the Low-Level gas
concentration and once the analyzer reading was stable, the analyzer value was recorded. This process was repeated
for the High-Level gas. For the Calibration Error Test, Low, Mid, and High Level calibration gases were
sequentially introduced directly to the analyzer. All values were within 2.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5
ppmv l%o absolute difference.
High or Mid Level gas (whichever was closer to the stack gas concentration) was introduced at the probe and the
tinre required for the analyzer reading to reach 95 percent or 0.5 pprnv/%o (whichever was less restrictive) of the gas
concentration rvas recorded. The analyzer reading was observed until it reached a stable value, and this value was
recorded. Next, Low Level gas was introduced at the probe and the tinre required for the analyzt reading to
decrease to a value within 5.0 percent or 0.5 ppmv/7o (whichever was less restrictive) was recorded. If the Low-
Level gas was zero gas, the response was 0.5 ppmvlo/o or 5.0 percent of the upscale gas concentration (whichever
was less restrictive). The analyzer reading was observed until it reached a stable value and this value was recorded.
The measurement system response time and initial system bias were detennined from these data. The System Bias
was within 5.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmvi%o absolute difference.
High or Mid Level gas (whichever was closer to the stack gas concentration) was introduced at the probe. After the
analyzer response was stable, the value was recorded. Next, Low Level gas was introduced at the probe, and the
analyzer value recorded once it reached a stable response. The System Bias was within 5.0 percent of the
Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmvl%o absolute difference or the data was invalidated and the Calibration Error Test and
System Bias were repeated.
Drift between pre- and post-run System Bias was within 3 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/7o absolute
difference. If the dlift exceeded 3 percent or 0.5 ppmv/%o, the Calibration Enor Test and System Bias were repeated.
ffiIA
RTK - Magna, UT
ll of 47
AST-2023-3 I 78 Page 3-2
TECHNICAL GN$LJtr Source Test Report
Testing Methodologt
An NOz - NO converter check was perfonned on the analyzer= prior to initiating testing and at the completion of
testing. An approximately 50 ppm nitrogen dioxide cylinder gas was introduced directly to the NOx analyzer urd
the instrument response was recorded in an electronic data sheet. The instrument response was within +/- l0 percent
of the cylinder concentration.
A Data Acquisition System with battery backup was used to record the instrument response in one (l) minute
averages. The data was continuously stored as a *.CSV file in Excel format on the hard drive of a computer. At the
completion of testing, the data was also saved to the Alliance server. All data was reviewed by the Field Team
Leader before leaving the facility. Once arriving at Alliance's office, all written and electronic data was
relinquished to the report coordinator and then a final review was performed by the Project Manager.
RTK-Magn4 UT
12 of 47
AST-2023-3 I 78 Page 3-3
13 of 47
Appendix A
Example CalculationsTECHNf CAL GFlOUP
Locetion Rio Tinto Kennecott - Meena' UT
Source Rentech Boiler SME030
Project No. AST-202&3178
Run No. I
Parameter(s) VFR
Meter Pressure (Pm), in. Hg
AHPm = Pb+136
where'
PbA: barometric pressure, in. Hg
AH 1.000 : pressure differential oforifice, in H2O
e.@:in.us
Absolute Stack Gas Pressure (Ps), in. Eg
PgPs = Pb *:-
1,3.6
where,
Pb 25.81 : barometric pressure, in. Hg
Pg&: static pressure, in. H2O
P.@:in.Hg
Standrrd Meter Volune (Vmstd), dscf
Vmstd =
17.636xVmxPmxY
where,
Y 1.050 : meter correction factor
v, -...Eos- : meter volume, cf
Prn-F: absolute meter pressure, in. Hg
Tm 527.0 = absolute meter temperature, oR
vr.td-7616-:d."f
Standard Wet Volume (Vwstd), scf
where,
Vwstd: 0.04716 x Mc
Vlc 135.9 : Volume of I{2O collected, mlv*.tdall6il:."f
Vwstd
BWS =(Vwstd * Vmstd)
Vwstd 6.409 : standard wet volume, scf
Vmstd 32.020 : standard meter volume, dscf
BWS 0.167 : dimensionless
Tm
Moisture Fraction (BWSsat), dimensionless (theoretical at saturated conditions)
10ffi?_(ffi)
BWSsat =
-
where, Ps
TrJ3qg-= stack temperatur€, oF
P.4= absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
BWSsat 1.000 : dimensionless
Moisture Fraction (BWS), dimensionless
where,
14 of 47
Appendix A
Example CalculationsTHCHNICAL GFi(}U;:
Locetion Rio Tinto Kennecott - Magn., UT
Source Rentech Boiler SME030
Project No. AST-2023-3178
Run No. I
Parameter(s) VFR
Moisture Fraction (BWS), dimensionless
BWS = BWSmsd unless BWSsat ( BWSmsd
where,
BWSsat 1.000 : moisture fraction (theoretical at saturated conditions)
BWSmsd 0.167 : moisture fiaction (measured)
BWS-OT-
Molecular Weight (DRY) (Md), Ib/lb-mole
Md = (0.44 x o/oCO2) + (0.32 x o/oO2) + (0.28(100- o/oCO2 - o/oO2))
where,
CO:A: carbon dioxide concentration, 0Z
O, .....-].| : oxYgen concentration, Yo
Md 29.70 : lb/lb mol
Molecular Weight (WET) (Ms), lbflb-mole
Ms = Md (1 - BWS) + 18.015 (BWS)
where.
Md29J0
BWS 0.167
Ms 27.75
: molecular weight (DRY), lb/lb mol
: moisture fraction, dimensionless
: lb/lb mol
Average Velocity (Vs), ft/sec
Vs=85.49 x Cp
wherq
Cp 0.84
^Pv2-tril-
x (A P rl2) avg x
= pitot tube coefficient
= average pre/post test velocity head ofstack gas, (in. H2O)'2
Tt ?20.6 _= average pre/post test absolute stack temperature, oR
Pr-]!!.!-= absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
Mr_.-[!= molecular weight of stack gas, lb/lb mol
Vs 34J = ft/sec
Average Stack Gas Flow at Stack Conditions (Qa), acfm
Qa=60xVsxAs
where,
VrA: stack gas velocity, fl/sec
Org: cross-sectional area of stack, ft2
Qa 32,518 : acfm
Average Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions (Qs), dscfm
Qsd = 17.636 x Qa x (1 - BWS) x
Qu_12J.1!_: average stack gas flow at stack conditions, acfm
BWS 0.167 : moisture fraction, dimensionless
p.TIl-: absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
Ts 720.6 : average pre/post test absolute stack temperature, oR
Qs l7,l 15 = dscfm
Ps
Ts
where,
15 of 47
tuTECHNICAL GFIOUF
Location Rio Tinto Kennecott - Maqna, UT
Appendix A
Example Calculations
Source Rentech Boiler SME030
Project No. l! I -ZOn{ll I
Run No. I
Parameter(s) VFR
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Check (Yqa), percent
Yqa =
where,
527.O
AH@ 1.68s
Pb 25.8t
AHavg 1.000
Md 29.70(oD''---@
Yqa_4
= meter correction factor, dimensionless
: run time, min.
35.205 : total meter volume, dcf
: absolute meter temperature, oR
: orifice meter calibration coefticient, in. HrO
= barometric pressure, in. Hg
: average pressure differential oforifice, in H2O
= molecular weight @RY), lb/lb mol
= average square root pressure differential oforifice, (in. I{rO)''
= percent
**.)
x 100
1.0s
6o
Y
o
Vm
Tm
0.0319xTmx29
16 of 47
tuTECH\ICAL GROUP
Location: fuo Tinto Kennecott - Magna, UT
where,
Appendix A
Example Calculations
Source: Rentech Boiler SME030
Project No.: AST-2023-3 17 8
Run No. /lVlethod Run I / Method 3A
Or - Outlet Concentration (CoJ, o/o dry
co,: (cou,-c.)* ( dfq-)
C6,_A: average analyzer value during test, 7o dry
C" 0.13 = average ofpretest & posttest zero responses,o/odry
CM4 10.98 = actual concentration of calibration gas,o/odry
CM 10.93 = average ofpretest & posttest calibration responses, To dry
Co" 3.29 : Oz Concentration,%o dry
17 of47
tuTECH\ICAL GHOUP
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - Magna, UT
Source: Rentech Boiler SME030
Project No.: AST-2023-3 17 8
Run No. /lVlethodRun I / Method 3A
COz - Outlet Concentration (CcoJ, V" dry
cco,: (cou,-c.)* ( #e;-)
Cou, ----1!![ : average analy zer value during test, o/o dry
Co 0.17 = average ofpretest & posttest zero responses, 7o dry
CMA 10.76 : actual concentration ofcalibration gas,o/odry
CM 10.78 : average ofpretest & posttest calibration responses, 7o dry
Cco, 9.83 : COz Concentration,%o dry
Appendix A
Example Calculations
where,
l8 of47
Appendix A
Example Calculations
TEC,i.I\iCAL GRQUP
Location: No Tinto Kennecott - Maena. UT
Source: Rentech Boiler SME030
Project No.: AST-2023-3 178
Run No. /Method Run I / Method 7E
NOx - Outlet Concentration (Cxo,), ppmvd
Cuo*= (cos.-ce)x f ,c*, t\ ccMEI/
where,
CourA: average analyzer value duringtest, ppmvd
Co 0.44 : average of pretest & posttest zero responses, ppmvd
CMA 48.10 : actual concentration ofcalibration gas, ppmvd
CM 48.38 : average ofpretest & posttest calibration responses, ppmvd
CNo* 13.71 : NOx Concentration, ppmvd
NOx - Outlet Emission Rate (ERys,), lb/hr
FD - CNo*xMWxQsx60 ffx28.32 ha^No* -
where,
CNo,
MW
Qs
ERruo"
13.71
46.0055
: NOx - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
= NOx molecular weight, g/g-mole: stack gas volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, dscfm: lb/hr
19 of 47
20 of47
TEGHNiCAL GFIC}U-
Emissions Calculations
Location Rio Tinto Kennecott - Magna, UT
Source Rentech Boiler SME030
Project No. AST-2023-3 178
Run Number Runl Run2 Run3 Average
Date
Start Time
Stop Time
r0t4t23
9:35
l0:35
l0t4t23 t0l4l23
10:50 12:05
1l:50 13:05
Input Data - Outlet
Volumetric Flow Rate (Ml-4), dscfm Qs l7,ll5 22,966 23,049 21,043
Calculated Data - Outlet
Oz Concentration,%o dry co, 3.29 3.32 3.30 3.30
COz Concentration, o/o dry cco, 9.83 9.79 9.83 9.82
NOx Concentration, ppmvd
NOx Emission Rate, lb/hr
Cro*
ERuo*
t3.71
1.7
t3.7 t
2.3
13.56
2.2
13.66
2.1
2l of 47
&TECHNICAL gROI.}P Method I Data
Ier.ioa Rb TiDb lftllr@( - M
Sounc Reilch Boilet SMDoJo
Projst No. AST-20233178
Drtc l0I[/23
DuctorientrtioE Vcdcal
Dr"t D".igo, --Effi-
Diilrmc fron Frr Wall lo Outside of Po(: 60.38 ln
Nipple lingth: 6.38 in
Dcpth ofDuct: 5,[.0O in
Cmssdioul^rc.ofDuct: 15.90 ft
No. of T6i Poru: 2
NumbcrofRcadinsiD.rPoint: I
Di(mGA: 15.0 fr
Di$m. A Duct Dismct..,-iii-1.-r bot 0.5.y
Distrft. B: 253 ft
Distea B Duca Dlrmct.n: 5.6 (must be> 2)
MiBimum Nmbcr of Trrvee Pointr: 16
AaturlNudberofTrrvcEPoi[ta: 16
Mer$rcr (Irilirl rtrd Drt.): _!!E_
R6'isrr (Iritid ud Drh): RBB
LOCATION OT TNAVTNSE FOINTS
Ntmber of t@ov poifr 0 o t iM
I
3
1
6
7
8
9
l0
ll
t7
3 5 6 7 8 9 l0 ll 12
14.6-6.7-4.4-3.2-2.6-2.1
85.4-2J.0-14.6-10.5-8.2-6.7
75.0-29.6-r9.4-t4.6-11.8: : '1' - lll - l\;i - i:i '.-
)i,:l
95.6 - 80.6 - 6J.8 -- 35.6
89.5-11.4-64.4- - l,:" -'-'i'"fi.:
- 979
iAide*oll b E@e$e point.
TrNers
Point
'h oI
Diu€t€r
Di!rm.fon
outridc ofsall
I
3
I
5
6
7
8
9
10
ll
t2
3.2
10.5
19.4
32.3
61.7
80.6
89.5
-'
L13
5.67
10.48
t1.44
36.56
43.52
4E.31
":,
8.tl
12.05
16.86
21.42
42.94
{9.90
5{.71
"i'
:@r&
Shck DiagMr
A= 15ff.
B=25n.
Deillof Dd= 51in
Cr6s SdioMl Area
oaaoaaoa
Up*6m
Dl$urbrrce
22 of 47
tuTECIINiCAL OBOTJF
Cyclonic Flow Check
Location Rio Tinto Kennecott - Masna. UT
Source Rentech Boiler SME030
Project No. AST-2023-3178
Date l0l4l23
Sample Point Angle (AF0)
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
l0
ll
t2
13
t4
15
t6
Average
J
4
7
2
-4
-5
0
2
-J
-7
-5
2
0
6
6
l0
4.1
23 of 47
AI€rce
I i. * ll'^l: fi AL G,q(]ti :3
Method 2 Data
Location Rio Tinto Kennecott - Magna, UT
Source Rentch Boiler SMf,030
Project No. AST-2023-3178
Traverse No.
Date
Status
Start Tim€
Stop Time
Leak Check
I
t0/4/23
VALID
9:35
9:50
P6s
,
t0/4/23
VALID
t0:55
t t:10
Pass
3
t0l4/23
VALID
l2:05
t2.20
Pass
4
t0t4t23
VALID
l2:55
l3:03
Pass
Traverse Point AP
/in tUf t
Ts
/oF\
AP
(in. WC)
Ts
/oF',)
AP Ts
/oEr
AP
/in \flf)
Ts
/.8)
al
7
3
4
5
6
7
8
lrl
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0.07
0.09
0. l0
0.12
0.12
0. l3
0. l3
0. l0
0.06
0.08
0. l0
0. l2
0.13
0.10
0. l0
0.08
235
241
247
25-i
255
257
257
258
235
242
249
255
258
260
261
260
0.31
0.34
0.37
0.38
0.41
0.45
0.4'7
0.43
0.31
0.33
0.38
0.41
0.51
0.45
0.40
0_41
244
260
2',14
278
280
283
283
281
247
244
2s9
270
28r
282
282
280
0.33
0.35
0.41
0.43
0.45
0.46
0.48
0.42
0.33
0.3'7
0.41
0.44
0.47
0.51
0.48
0.43
247
262
268
275
282
285
284
285
245
246
258
269
283
283
284
285
0.31
0.34
0.37
0.38
0.4 t
0.4s
0.47
0.43
0.31
0.33
0.38
0.41
0.5 t
0.45
0.40
0.41
244
260
274
278
280
283
283
281
247
244
2s9
210
281
282
282
280
Run No.I 2 3 Averag€
Square Root of AP, (in. WC)ID (AP)'"
Average AP, in. WC (AP)
Pitot Tube Coefficient (Cp)
Barometric Pressure (Pb)
Static Prssure, in. WC (Pg)
Stack Pressure, in. Hg (P,
Average Temp€rature, oF (Ts)
Av€rage Temperature, oR (Ts)
l\teasuredMoistureFraction (BWSmsd)
Moisture Fraction @ Saturrtion (BWSsat)
MoistureFraction (BWS)
02 Concentration, T" (Or)
CO2 Concentration, 7o (CO,
Molecular Weight, lb/lb-mole (dr]) (Md)
Molecular Weight, Ib/lb-mole (wet) (Ms)
Velocity, ftlsec (Vs)
VFR rt stack conditions, acfm (Qa)
VFR aa saandard conditions, sclh (Qsw)
VFR aa saandard conditions, scfm (Qsw)
VFR at standard conditions, dscfm (Qsd)
0.4'13
0.25
0.840
25.8 I
0.02
25.81
26r.0
'720.6
0.t67
1.000
0. t67
3.29
9.83
29.'t0
27.',l5
34.t
32,5 I 8
t,232,439
20,541
l7.l t5
0.639
0.41
0.840
25.81
0.02
25.81
270.9
730.6
0.167
1.000
0.167
3.32
9.79
29.10
27.',l5
46.3
44,225
1,653,343
21,556
22.966
0.639
0.41
0.840
25.8 I
0.02
25.81
270.9
730.6
0.163
r.000
0.163
3.30
9.83
29.70
27.80
46.3
44,t86
1,65 1,904
)? t1:)
21 049
0.584
0.36
0.840
25.8 I
0.02
25.81
267.6
721.3
0.165
1.000
0.165
3.30
9.82
29.70
27.77
12.2
40,309
|,5t2,562
25,209
21.043
24 of 47
A.*
T€Cri tl:i CAL $F(}UP
Method 4 Dila
Loc{tion
Soure Rmteh Boild SMEoJI
rtuJ(. ro-
D...-"r"/"1
Console tinitr / Method ft3 M{
lun No.
)atc
itrtu!
it.rl Time
ind Time
lun Time, min (0)
I
t0/4/23
VALID
9:35
l0:35
60
M5-30
2
t0t4/23
VALID
l0:50
I l:50
60
MJ.3O
3
t0t1t23
VALID
l2:05
l3:05
60
d€ter Correctio, Flctor (Y)
)rifice Cdibretion Vrlue (lE @)
dar Vacuum, in. Ilg
ro.t lrrk Check- fa/min (xt mri vrc-)
1.050
1.685
l5
0 00lar -1"
1.050
1.685
l5
0 00la 5'
1.050
1.685
l5
lleter Volume, ft3
0
5
IO
l5
20
3{)
35
.10
,15
50
60
50 7.379
5 10.755
ill.876
Jt6.568
519.225
522.125
i25.043
528.214
530.994
533.651
J36.586
J39.675
5.12.5E4
542.il5
545.549
548.587
551.395
5i4.245
557.215
-560.3 l5
563.412
566.124
569.245
5?2.35t
515.421
57t.325
578.485
581.585
584.627
587.121
590.3 t7
593.483
596.314
599.585
603.r2.r
606.287
609.318
6t2.486
6t5.412
36 987
Tcmperrture, oF
0
5
l0
l5
20
25
30
35
40
,t5
50
60
Alersgc TemDerature,6F
Averrge Temperature, oR
Minimum Temperalure, oF
Mxriilum Tmnerrture. oF
(Tm)
(Tm)
Mctrr
65
66
66
67
6?
67
67
68
68
68
68
69
69
6?
527
65
69
Probc Filter !om Imp. Eri
62
59
5E
5i
53
i3
52
5t
5l
5l
5I
52
52
51
5l
Mder
69
69
69
69
69
?0
70
70
70
7t
7t
7t
?t
70
530
69
7t
Probe Filter Vacuum
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
lmp. fxil
65
62
5t
5E
55
55
54
54
54
53
54
55
56
56
53
Metcr
70
70
70
70
70
7t
7t
7t
7t
72
72
12
72
7t
531
70
Probe Filter V!cuum
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
l
Imp. Eril
62
60
55
55
54
54
53
53
53
52
55
55
56
55
52
Baromdric Pressurq in. Hg (Pb)
Metcr Orifice Prglure, in. WC (lH)
Meter Pr6sure, in. Hg (P-)
Srendrrd Met€rvolume.ft3 (Vmstd)
2J.8I
r.000
2i.88
25.8 I
1.000
25.88
25.81
1.000
25.88
Anrly!is Type
Iilpinger I , Pre,iPost Tst, g
lmpitrger 2, Pre/PostTst, g
lmping€r 3, Pre/PostT6t, g
Impirg€r.1, Pre/Post I$t, g
Volumewater Colleded, mL (Vlc)
S(ildrd Wrter Volum€, fl (vNstd)
Moisture Frrction Mesurcd (BWS)
Gas Moleculrr Weight,llr/lll-uolc (dry) (Md)
DGM Calibrrtiotr ChekValu€ (Yoe)
Gmvi
H20
H20
E-pq"
'766.0
758.0
678.4
872.1
772.3
683.5
97t 4
I06.,1
14.3
5.1
H20
H20
Empt]'
172.4
772.3
6t3.5
975 4
978.0
791.0
686.5
984 3
105.6
t8.7
3.0
89
H20
H20
E.pt)
Silica
'143.1
780.4
633.5
943 8
884.1
760.1
63t.0
956 7
140.?
-20.3
4.5
129
135.9
6.409
0.167
29.70
0.4
136.2
6.423
0.t67
79.70
1.0
137.8
6.499
0.1 63
29.70
25 of 47
tuTECT{NIC*"L GFIOUP
Runl-RMData
Location: Rio Tinto Kennmtt - Mma UT
Source: Rentech Boiler SME030
Projsa No: AST-2023-3 178
Dilet lOl4D3
Time
Unit
Shttr.
O,-Outlet CO,-Outlet NOr-Outlet
'/o dry '/o dry ppmvd
9:35
9:36
9:37
9:38
9:39
9:4O
9:41
9:42
9:43
9:44
9:45
9:46
9:4'l
9;48
9:49
9:50
9:51
9:52
9:53
9:54
9:55
9:56
9:57
9:58
9:59
l0:00
l0:01
l0:02
l0:03
l0:M
l0:05
l0:06
l0:07
l0:08
l0:09
l0:10
l0:ll
l0: l2
l0:13
l0: l4
l0:15
l0: l6
l0:17
l0:1 8
l0:19
l0:20
l0:21
lO:22
l0:23
lO:24
l0:25
lO:26
l0:27
l0:28
lO:29
l0:30
l0:31
l0:32
l0:33
l0:34
Uncorrected Rutr Average (C6)
Cal Gs CoDcertration (Crr{)
Pretqt Syrtu Zero RspoBsc
PGtt6t System Zero R6poose
Aversge Zrro R$ponle (Co)
Prctat Syrtem Cel Reponse
PcttBt Systcm Cd Rcporse
Average Cal Respome (Cy)
Or - Outlet COr - Oudet NOr - Outlet
3.33
3.33
3.34
3.34
3.37
3.35
3.36
3.35
3.35
3.26
3.39
3.38
3.35
3.32
3.31
3.36
JJO
3.39
3.34
3.32
3.3 r
3.36
3.34
3.38
3.32
3.35
3.3't
3.39
3.38
3.35
3.40
3.38
3.36
3.32
3.40
3.35
3.32
3.32
3.41
3.37
3.31
3.42
3.38
3.36
3.35
3.36
3.35
3.41
3.38
3.31
3.38
3.39
3.40
3.35
3.40
3.41
3.3',7
3.38
3.41
9.88
9.87
9.86
9.86
9.84
9.86
9.88
9.85
9.85
9.86
9.90
9.83
9.83
9.86
9.88
9.85
9.86
9.85
9.85
9.88
9.89
9.89
9.86
9.86
9.84
9.88
9.85
9.86
9.86
9.84
9.8',1
9.84
9.86
9.87
9.89
9.85
9.87
9.90
9.88
9.84
9.86
9.85
9.82
9.86
9.87
9.90
9.88
9.88
9.84
9.86
9.91
9.86
9.86
9.86
9.89
9.47
9.84
9,89
9.86
9.86
10.76
14.03
14.05
14.o7
14.00
14.06
14.05
t4.ll
14. l5
14.08
t4.07
t4.22
t4.t4
14.03
t4.2t
14.38
t4.29
14.32
14.30
t4.17
t4.t?
14.t3
l4.lt
t4.o2
t4.u
t4.u)
14.03
t4.M
14.06
t4.o2
14.07
14.06
t4.05
l4.M
14.05
t4.t4
14.o't
14.14
t4.t7
t4.27
r4.23
t4.23
14. l9
14.t4
14.08
14.05
14.03
13.99
13.99
14.00
14.02
14,08
14.09
t4.02
14.03
14.08
14.06
r4.o2
14.o4
14.08
t4.o2
48. l0
0.51
0.36
0.44
48.86
47.89
48.38
3.36
10.98
9.86 14.10
o.tz 0.16
0 13 0.18
0. t3 0.r'110.92 10.73
l0 93 10.83
26 of47
10.93 10.78
tu
TE c HN rcAL G Ro t
l*',,on,
Run2-RMData
Project No.: AST-2023-3 I 78
D^tet l0l4l23
Time
Unia
Strttr3
Or - Outlet COr - Outlet NOr - Outlet
'/e dry o/e drf ppmvd
Valid Valid Valid
l0:50
l0:5 I
l0:52
l0:53
l0:54
l0:55
l0:56
10:57
l0:58
10i59
I t:00
I l:01
I t:02
I l:03
I l:04
I t:05
I l:06
I l:0?
I l:08
I l:09
l l:10
ll:ll
ll:12
I l:13
Iti14
1l:15
I l:16
ll:17
I l:18
I l:19
ll:2O
I l:21
ll:22
ll:23
llt24
ll:25
ll:26
ll:27
I l:28
ll:29
ll:30
I l:31
ll:32
I l:33
I l:34
I l:35
I l:36
I l:37
I l:38
I l:39
I l:40
I l:41
ll:42
I l:43
I l:44
I l:45
I l:46
ll:4'1
I l:48
I l:49
Uncorrsted Run Ayerage (C.6)
Cal Gu Concentration (Cy.1)
Pretqt System Zero R$ponse
Psttst System Zero Response
Avcrrgc Zcro RBponse (Co)
Pretqt Syltem Cal RespoNe
PGttelt System Cal RspoNe
Averrg€ Cal R6pome (CM)
Or - Ouiler CO, - Otrtlet NOr - Outlet
3.44
3.42
3.37
3.41
3.43
3.42
3.40
3.31
3.39
3.34
3.42
3.40
3.40
3.41
3.40
3.37
3.38
3.44
3.43
3.42
3.43
3.40
3.35
3.35
3.44
3.42
3.37
3.41
3.31
3.35
3.39
3.39
3.38
3.43
3.40
3.36
3.44
3.41
3.35
3.31
3.43
3.U
3.37
3.37
3.41
3.36
3.44
3.39
3.39
3.41
3.37
3.38
3.35
3.40
3.39
3.35
3.39
3.41
3.33
3.39
10.98
0. l3
0. l2
0.13
10.93
10.93
10.93
9.80
9.81
9.84
9.84
9.83
9.81
9.8t
9.82
9.88
9.85
9.88
9.81
9.84
9.84
9.84
9.83
9.85
9.84
9.82
9.81
9.83
9.8t
9.85
9.88
9.88
9.83
9.83
9.87
9.85
9.91
9.88
9.86
9.85
9.87
9.83
9.85
9.87
9.83
9.83
9.88
9.88
9.84
9.83
9.87
9.47
9.86
9.89
9.85
9.86
9.87
9.85
9.88
9.87
9.88
9.85
9.86
9.89
9.86
9.87
9.9t
9.85
10.76
0. l8
0. l8
0.18
10.83
lo 79
14.08
14. l0
14. l0
t4. l0
14. l0
14.09
l4.ll
r4.12
14. l9
t4.22
14.29
14. l8
14.19
t4.21
t4. l3
14. l0
14.08
14.0E
13.95
13.96
t3.92
13.8E
13.94
13.90
14.03
13.94
r 3.90
14.08
14.05
14.13
14. l3
t4.t2
14.05
14. l0
t3.96
13.95
14.01
I 3.89
t3.93
13.91
I 3.89
I 3.86
13.85
t3.94
t4.o1
14.01
14. l0
14.06
14.03
14.03
13.97
13.99
t4.02
t4.04
14.01
14.01
13.95
r3.90
t3.92
13.96
14.03
48. l0
0.36
0.49
0.43
47.89
48 4t
l5
7t
27 of 47
48.
tu
TECHN ICAL GROU P
Lmrtiotr: Rio Tinto Kaneott - Mua tII
Run3-RMData
Source:
Project No.:AST-2023-3178
D*et lol4l23
Time
Unit
Sirrtr.
Or - Outlet
o/e dry
Valid
COr-Oudet NOr-Oualea
o/o dry ppmvd
Valid Valid
l2:05
l2:O6
l2t0'l
l2:08
l2:O9
l2: l0
l2:ll
l2:12
l2:13
l2:14
12:15
12:16
l2:l'1
l2:1 8
12:19
l2:2O
l2t2l
l2:22
l2:23
l2:24
l2:25
l2:26
l2:27
l2:28
12:29
l2:30
l2:31
12:32
l2:33
l2:34
l2:35
l2:36
l2:37
l2:38
l2:39
l2:4O
l2:41
l2:42
l2:43
l2:44
12145
l2:46
l2:4'l
l2:48
l2:49
l2:5O
t2:51
12:52
l2:53
t2.54
12:55
l2:56
12:57
l2:58
l2:59
t3:00
l3:01
l3:02
l3:03
l3:04
Uncorrst€d Run Averrg€ (C.b)
Cal Gu Concentration (Cuq)
Pret$t Syst€m Zero R6poNe
PosttBt Syst€m Zero Reponse
Av€ng€ Z€ro RBponsc (Co)
Pretst System Cd R6poBe
Pctt6t Syst€m Crl R6porse
Averag€ Cal R$ponse (CM)
Or - Outlet CO, - Outlet NOr - Outlel
3.32
3.32
3.34
3.32
3.40
3.42
3.42
3.42
3.4t
3.39
3.39
3.37
3.36
3.41
3.44
3.4t
3.4t
3.34
3.36
3.41
3.42
3.33
3.39
3.43
3.33
3.39
3.40
3.38
3.35
3.37
3.32
3.32
3.37
3.39
3.38
3.44
3.38
3.33
3.36
3.38
3.29
3.34
3.39
3.38
3.32
J. JU
3.34
3.39
3.40
3.38
3.37
3.43
3.4t
3.40
3.31
3.38
3.38
3.36
3.37
10.98
o.tz
o.t2
o.t2
10.93
10.93
10.93
9.93
9.93
9.90
9.91
9.86
9.86
9.86
9.84
9.86
9.87
9.87
9.89
9.89
9.87
9.84
9.86
9.88
9.91
9.90
9.86
9.84
9.90
9.88
9.84
9.90
9.88
9.86
9.86
9.89
9.87
9.91
9.91
9.89
9.86
9.87
9.90
9.85
9.86
9.90
9.89
9.88
9.85
9.92
9.89
9.86
9.88
9.89
9.92
9.88
9.87
9.86
9.87
9.88
9.84
9.84
9.86
9.90
9.86
9.86
9.88
9.88
10.76
0. l8
0. l4
o. l6
10.79
10.8 I
10.80
14.1 5
14.13
14.05
14.05
t3.94
t3.86
13.87
t3.81
13.85
13.8r
t 3.91
13.95
14.o2
14.01
14.02
t4.02
t4.M
14.0't
14.00
13.90
13.88
13.
13.'18
13.69
13.81
1 3.78
t3.79
t3.76
13.85
t3.94
14.05
14.04
14.08
14.03
t4.o2
14.16
r3.99
r3.93
14.03
t3.99
13.98
I 3.95
r 3.96
t4.07
14.00
14.04
t4.01
14.03
t3.97
t4.a
13.95
13.99
13.92
t3.90
13.88
13.85
I 3.86
13.87
13.96
13.94
48. l0
0.49
o.42
o.46
48.41
48.28
48.35
28 of47
DIVISION OF AIR OUALITY
29 of47
atfu
TECHI,IiCAL GROUtr
QA Data
Location Rio Tinto Kennecott - Magna, UT
Source Rentech Boiler SME030
Project No. AST-2023-3 178
Parameter Or - Outlet COr - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Make
Model
s/N
Oneratins Range
seryomex
1400
t420-4
0-25
seryomex
l4l0
l4l5-c
0-25
Thermo
42C
67858358
0-100
Cylinder ID
7*ro
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
NA
E80093372
RR03252
NA
NA
880093372
RRo3252
NA
NA
880010852
EB0010852
Cylinder Certifed Values
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
NA
10.76
24
NA
NA
10.98
23.7
NA
NA
96.2
96.2
Cylinder Expiration Date
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
NA
7120129
t0lt9l29
NA
NA
7120/29
t0lt9t29
NA
NA
t0l2l29
t0l2129
30 of 47
tuTECHUTCAL {}Ft(fUP
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - Mama, UT
Response Times
Source: Rentech Boiler SME030
Project No.: 4lr-?444?!
seconds
Parameter Oz - Ouflet COr- Ouflet NOx- Ouflet
Zero
Low
Mid
Hieh
l5
NA
:
l5
NA
l5
l5
NA
::
Averase 15.0 15.0 r5.0
3l of 47
tuTECH\iCAL GROI.,'P Calibration Data
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - Magna. UT
Source: Rentech Boiler SME030
Project No.: AST-2023-3 178
Date: 10/4/23
Parameter O: - Outlet COr - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Exoected Averase Concentration 6.00 14.00 20.00
Span Between
Low
High
Desired Snan
6.00
30.00
24.00
14.00
70.00
23.70
20.00
100.00
96.20
Low Range Gas
Low
Hish
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
I{id Range Gas
Low
Hish
9.60
t4.40
9.48
14.22
38.48
57.72
High Range Gas
Low
Hish
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
{ctual Concentration (% or ppm)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
0.00
NA
10.98
24.00
0.00
NA
10.76
23.70
0.00
NA
48.10
96.20
Resoonse Time (seconds)15.00 15.00 r5.00
Uoscale Calibration Gas (C Mid Mid Mid
Instrument Response (7o or ppm)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
-0.02
NA
10.96
23.96
0.14
NA
10.85
23.77
0.10
NA
48.05
96.37
Performance (7o of Span or Cal. Gas Conc.)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hioh
0.08
NA
0.08
0.t7
0.59
NA
0.38
0.30
0.10
NA
0.05.
0.18
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
32 of 47
Bias/Drift Determinations
TECH'.J ICAL GffOU,;)
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - Magna. UT
Source: Rentech Boiler SME030
Project No.: AST-2023-3178
Parameter Or - Outlet COz - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Run I Date l0l4l23
Span Value
Initial Instrurnent Zero Cal Response
Initial Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem l]oscale Resnonse
24.0
0.0
l r.0
0.1
0.1
10.9
t0.9
23.7
0.1
10.9
0.2
0.2
10.'7
r 0.8
96.2
0.1
48. l
0.5
0.4
48.9
47.9
sias (%)
ketest Zero
losttest Zero
?retest Span
hcftecf Snan
0.6
0.6
-0.2
-0 1
0.1
0.2
-0.5
-0.1
0.4
0.3
0.8
-0.2
)rift (%)
Z,ero
\,1id
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.4
-0.2
- 1.0
Run 2 Date l0l4l23
Span Value
Instrument Zero Cal Response
Instrument Upscale Cal Response
hetest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest System Upscale Response
24.0
0.0
l 1.0
0.1
0.1
10.9
10.9
23.7
0.r
10.9
0.2
0.2
10.8
10.8
96.2
0.1
48. I
0.4
0.5
47.9
48.4
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Span
0.6
0.6
-0.1
-0.1
0.2
0.2
-0.1
-0.3
0.3
0.4
-0.2
0.4
Drift(%)
Zero
Mid
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.2
0.1
0.s
Run 3 Date l0l4l23
Span Value
Instrument Zero Cal Response
Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem Uoscale Resoonse
24.0
0.0
I 1.0
0.1
0.1
10.9
r 0.9
23.7
0.1
10.9
0.2
0.1
10.8
r 0.8
96.2
0.1
48. I
0.5
0.4
48.4
48.3
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Span
0.6
0.6
-0.1
-0.1
0.2
0.0
-0.3
-0.2
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.2
Drift(%)
Zero
Mid
0.0
0.0
-0.2
0.1
-0. I
-0. I
33 of 47
/** rult*
Accreditation #62754
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71107
800-551 -81 50
PGVP Vendor lD # G12021
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:
Product lD Number:
Cylinder Pressure:
coA #
Customer PO. NO.:
Customer:
I R03252
127907
1900 PS|G
7RO3252.20211012-O
Certification Date:
Expiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Certifi cation Dates:
10t21t2021
10119t2029
snreveoon - I A
RRO3252.2r)211012
1 0392381 5
standard has been certified p€r the May 2012 EPA Traceability Protocol, Document EPA-600/R-121531,
procedure G2.
Certified Concentration(s)
Concentration
23.7 %
24.0%
Uncertainty Analytical Principle
NDIR
MPA
Assayed On
1U21t2oX
10t20t2021
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
to.'18 0/o
r0.13 %
Nitrogen Balance
Analytical Measurement Data Available Online
SMART.CERT
cc7277A2.20201022
E80039149.20190610
E80078072.20't 80504
E80100923.2020',|022
20.03 vo
24.75 %
24%
19.47 0/a
Analytical lnstrumentation
o2
co2 NDIR
Thermo
Thermo
410i
410i
1't62980025 10t01t2021
1 162980025 10t'19t2021
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifications. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National lnstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lnternational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confidence level of the measurement, unless otherwise noted. This calibration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Services. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
6bj$i;","
Brittany Johnson
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Version 02-J, Revised on 2018-09-17
34 of 47
k.--!r3.r-|crrr.Xr&rffil?lia
Red Bal Teclutical Gc Service
SSCCnig tGrEdyffay
SiIlfo(!,tA 7tlf,
EC&55r4130
F61?l,c&Df Gl2&?r
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF A]TALYSIS
Ctrdrlrc
FrcGdDEdcr:
CF.r.rrttrsrtr
GOA*
GI&FOi,f!:qfficr:
Ctr0lc&E:ryeIErG@lilf&
Tr:liqf*dac
PraireGerffiEeEs:
-tA
TliB cam&r Wr, tG Deert EPATraceeilBro6c8"tkffi
Gl.
GertiEed
M Goctr{an lhrLilf AdrtcdPrfE*lseayeftxt
Darton Dioxide
Dxygpn
{0.7G %
{0-98 %
l{I_05 t6
*o-05%
NTXR
l,PA
wng&1
a7mfz&t
llihomn Bakrce
{,/.,,,,xIlg GrG ia @yw -- q!s-- --- -- l-E-----*--_sp--.*
@G@t s rEl o@
SXART4ERT
ThbbbcerqtEgastsr€frr€ndlrebeenc&!-aEdrH,adyerEedbrrEetttE(tsfiEdspffiirETlis
(*heti'lltsd rE perbfined uSry G6es a S*s that ae fGDlet,rlrgh l{atllrEa flslh.e d$idnd8 rd
fecfm*gy $USf) blhe Enfu SlsEr oaurffE{SD. Tlr ba{sdoompFarce 5aatsrl ba.D.rFissrrf,lle
GElrE rErt farEGrs b l'le $eaified d nrytU c&r$onru6&E pro6s. Ihe €rFatlred lrtaerffis irse a 6,erage
W ei Hi ry.siffi lhe gof oordlrene bd d&e mea*rerner( unEss olErise rE(L Tris*dbr 6flrc*
4$esortrrD[EIE ndescft€!, andsrraardberep(drcedcdsul'r hfi,I,Ei[unrtulaegrl'dfrun REd 8d
Teffi G€r S€nire f notid.deal,tEmoert*Sdcdtrdirr8aearail*r+o,rr€$estaducretarninbffirn
$tren ftgnir*rg gecs q EiL
Is&*dOperlioe ,@a
Assaftdorery RIdBdTGS
fr€rrar @-J, RariE t n?'lol,8-1T
35 of 47
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71107
800-551 -81 50
PGVP Vendor lO # G1202'l
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Gylinder Number:
Product lD Number:
Gylinder Pressure:
coA #
Customer PO. NO.:
Customer:
:8001 0852
123294
900 PsrG
=bVU lU6aZ.ZVZ IUVZU-L
Certification Date:
Expiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Certifi cation Dates:
10104t2021
101o212029
- Shreveoort - LA
E80010852.20210920
01 3071 1 69
This calibration standard has been certified per the May 201 2
G1
SMART-CERT
Goncentration Uncertainty Analytical Principle Assayed On
96.2 PPM 10.6 PPM Chemiluminescence 09t24t2021, 1 0 t04 12021
otal Oxides of Nitrogen 96.2 PPM
cc194349.20191 I 1 5
cc349576.202 1 0305
1152610017 0910412021
1152610017 10t01t2021
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifications. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National lnstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lnternational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testjng process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confidence level of the measurement, unless otheMise noted. This calibration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Services. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
,/arr*, W,rAu
Aaron Varelas
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Version 02-J. Revised on 2018-09-17
36 of 47
TCCIINiCAL GRO{JP
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - Magna, UT
Project No.: AST-2023-3 178
NO2 Converter Check - Outlet
Analyzer Make Thermo
Analyzer Model 42C
Serial Number 67858358
Cytinder ID Number EB005833J
Cylinder Exp. Date llll8l24
Cvlinder Concentration. nDm 48,8
Pre-Test Date 10/4123 Time 7:49
Pre-Test Concentration, ppm 45.15
Pre-Test Efficiency, 7o 93
Post-Test Date l0l4l23 Time 13:20
Post-Test Concentration, ppm 45.29
Post-Test Efficiencv. 7o 93
*Required Efiiciency is > 90 %.
37 of 47
^&*-Il!f,*.
Accreditation #62754
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71107
800-551-8't 50
PGVP Vendor lD # G12021
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:
Product lD Number:
Cylinder Pressure:
coA#
Customer PO. NO.:
Customer:
EB005E339
1 30',t 13
1550 PSIG
EB0058339.2021 0922-0
Certification Date:
Expiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Certifi cation Dates:
11t19t202'l
11t18t2024
snrevenon - I a
E5UUJdJ,'3.ZU11UYZZ
07433081 4
This calibration standard has been certified per the , Document EPA-600/R-12l531,
G2.
SMART.CERT
Concentration Uncertainty Analytical Principle Assayed On
48.8 PPM io.s PPM 10t15t2021 , 11t0512021 , 1111912021
Reference Standard(s)
E80069863.201 91 01 7
E80078072.20180504
Ea0083217 .20161201
EB00E5260.201 90102
EBo't00438.20190102
6.01 %o
24%
28,3 PPM
87.3 PPlil
60.9 PPt
SRM 2659a
071001
c1847810.02
cl847810.02
c1447410 02
Analytical lnstrumentation
410i
MKS 2O31DJG2EKVS13T
MKS 2O31DJG2EKVS13I
MKS 2O31DJG2EKVS13T
1162980025 10tO112021
017146467 09t17t2021
017146467 't0t22t2021
017146467 1111912021
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifications. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National lnstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lnternational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 95yo confidence level of the measurement, unless otherwise noted. This calibration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Services. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
: \. ::- f*. >-
Brandon Theus
Laboratory Supervisor
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Version 02-J, Revised on 2018-09-17
38 of47
NAIiarrce EPA Method 205
Field Calibration of Dilution System
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - Iuagn4 UT
Date
14ethod Criteria EPA
o2
Makr
Mode
s/r
Spar
Servomex
4900
100269
24.0
r Nrmher ID
Zero
Mid
gioh
NA
8B0069887
r Certilied Valu€s
Ttro
Mid
lIioh
0.0
10.96
Resoonse (Yo or oom)
Tcto
Mid
Hioh
0.0
I 1.0
n Gas Selection (7o ofSoan)
Mid
Hioh
45.7
t000
:alibraaion Error Performance (7o ofSpan)
Zero
Mid
0.0
0.0
0.1
Linearitv (o/o ofRanee)
-0. I
Analyzer Make
Analyzer Model: 4900
Analyzer SN: 100269
Environics ID: 841
Componert/BalanceGa: O2N2
Cylinder Go lD (Dilution): CC716358
Cylinder Ga Concentration (Dilution), %: 24
Cylinder Gm ID (Mid-Ievel): E80069887
Cylinder Gas Concentration (Mid-kvel), %
Target Mass Flow
Controllers
Target
Diltrtion farget Flow Rate
Target
Concentration
Actual
Concentration
Injection I
Atralyzer
Concentration
Injection 2
Analyzer
Concentration
lo/"\
lnjection 3
Analyzer
Concentration
Average
Analyzer
Concentration Dilference
Average
Error
( +2%\
IOU5L 80.0 50 t9 193 19.3 19.3 9 002 O lo/r
t0t./51-50.0 5.0 t)o 120 t2.o t2.o t2 02 oo)o 20/^
r ol/t L 200 4.0 4.8 4 48 48 4.8 4 '',17 -0.0 -n 70/"
I OL/t L 100 4.0 2.4 4 4 24 4 2.40 0.00 O.Oo/o
*NotallASTEnvironicsUnitshave2-lOLMassFlowControllers. Fortheseunitsthe90%@7lpmard80%@Tlptuinjectionswillnotbeconducted
Average
Analyzer
Conc€ntraaion
Injection I
Error
I L 2./"\
Injection 2
Error
( t2%\
Injection 3
Error
l+2%\
19.31 -o.t%o $/^o 10/.
12.02 o.oyo 0.\Yo o oo/"
4.77 o.t%-o.tyo t%
), 40 o oo/.-0.40/o 0.4Yo
Mid-Level Gas
Calibration
Gas
Concentration
Injection I
Analyzer
Conceotration
Injection 2
Analyzer
Concentration
Injection 3
Analyzer
Concentration
Average
Analyzer
Concentration Difference
Average
Error
( * 2./.1
r0 96 110 I t.0 I 1.0 1.00 004 o 40/r
39 of 4'1
Mass Flow Contoller Calibration
Document lD 620.009
Revisior 22.0
Effective Datc QA6N2
lssuing Departmenl Tech services Paq€1of1
Dilution S)6tem Make:
Dilution S)rsEm Model:
Dilution S)rsbm S/N:
Calibralion Equipment Make:
Calibration Equiprnent Model:
Calibra0on Equipment S/N:
Flow Cell S/t,l:
Flow Cell SAI:
Calibration Gas:
Barometric Pressure, mmHg:
Ambient Temperature, "F:
Environlcs
4040
8412
Alicat Scientific
MJ0SLPD/sMM-D/5t',4, lV-1SLPM-D/sM
206/208
127208
127206
Nitrogen
25.48
65.5
Mass Flor Confoller lD
Size, ccm:
Make:
Model:
S/N:
#.1
10,000
Environics
EIC2U
0626687006
*2
10,000
Environics
EFC 202
0626687003
'1,000
Environics
EFC 202
0626685003
Set Flow True Flow Diftrence
cdmin cdmin
Set Flow True Flow Difference
cc./mln cdmin
Set Flow True Flow Diftrence
cclmin cclmin
5o/o
10%
20o/o
30o/o
40o/o
50%
60Vo
70o/o
B0o/o
9e/o
100%
500 504 0.8%
1,000 1,024 2.4Vo
2,000 2,067 3.40k
3,000 3,095 3.2Vo
4,000 4,114 2.9"/"
5,000 5,130 2.6"/o
6,000 6,147 2.50h
7,000 7,159 2.3"/"
8,000 8,175 2.2%
9,000 9,184 2.0Yo
10,000 10,202 2.0%
500 508 1.60/0
1,000 1,030 3.u/o
2,000 2,069 3.50/o
3,000 3,104 3.50/0
4,000 4,142 3.60/o
5,000 5,159 3.2%
6,000 6,113 2.90/0
7,000 7,188 2.70k
8,000 8,194 2.4Yo
9,000 9,190 2.1Yo
10,000 10,198 2.00k
50 49 1.20h
100 100 0.470
200 201 0.2%
300 302 0.5o/o
400 403 0.8%
500 504 0.8o/o
600 60s 0.8%
700 707 1.0o/o
800 810 1.2%
900 914 16y"
1,000 1,020 20vo
Note: The mass flow controller's calibration values are used by the dilution system's operating software to improve accuracy. These calibrations are not necessarily
indicative of the systems overall performance. Performance is verifled by conducting a N/ethod 205 prior to each field use.
Calibration Performed By: TCH
Dare. 4/25/2023
40 of 47
.r€}}lxre}r
Red Bal Teclni:al Gas Scrrhe
ssC4Kem*Wr
Shueeort lI 71107
&s{ar58
F6t'PV*D}gUM'
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERNFICATE OF ANALYSIS
QtG!*deeMEllf&r:
q&CrPr€t.rr!:
o0Ar
eEtu*TFtLI(,.:
Hc
EffiIETT
t gl
lgtr!Pstg
:HXEE'AETEX}O
GlrkfEeidmE*
FGE ry]!trbok
TrciAgrhhr:
fuirhEC.r@IIEB
i7t'tENMl
ITEBi&B
sm?-I-a
:8ffi38nfiil3ffi-
stadaKrlE Ee$ erliEed frEEtlef Znz EPATTa@
Cerffied ConcertatinGl
SXART{ERT
Ga.EGtlHi.r$tltocry ldttHPficHe Efed(h
g7n*xr21
CITMIMI
Diodde $-05%
10-(F%
ilDm
lFAlos x
kre
Ar.lttul LstdtrtAt&(E:.
oa@ Grts fi!
atp@ -6r.s-_-_ !e_*"-_
wB Gr0s !e
fi81j, G.i15 SE&
2..e.a ..-_s13,___. s8s:EEg,rlt G.3, c{t{IttEG3
1r@@ 06t-rc1
t*iffi oBEE e,
T!*E is b oertrytE O€ rEftrstced ttre be6r cffif*4 zd tsiE, b rEctlEetled $effiiqt$ nir
c&rSvEGtG FftrEd rdtg G€€es rscaEs tftatarE Aacble [rEoCn ]Aald tls&rle dffi ard
T€cinotogy G6q b g! h&nE srd Wn of t nas (g). Tl3 lasb cacsIpGar slaE ii a cn@ dtE
rEsslr€rratgrarr€E(lbttErpecfiedare$nEd cehrEftrg proces.Tf:eryatd r'sldrrje8 tFaac6,gage
tacbof lF,2b 4{uir# tlE S,a sffiice hd o,UE ttEasr.emeot tx*sserb mlEd nft ffii Effi
4ghs 6fyb [c itsm &sofud ard Ehd rd be !l[ro*rd dErt n h frI, rrilE urer 4pord tur Red Bal
Ted&*dGasSerrits" f ndindded' fiet'|cE taigdcdbralirEaEai&b$oe!€ryeltadffie til(€tri6ur{
rtlrndaemanUPerfd"
%
Adroqlqr
Assaffi.O9.rddE Iaqt'Assayl#ef- RedBdTE
lreiD@J. FrtisloAliEG17
4l of 47
TJI.IIeJlt
Accreditation #62754
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71107
800-551 -81 50
PGVP Vendor lD # G12020
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:
Product lD Number:
Cylinder Pressure:
coA #
Customer PO. NO.:
Customer:
3C716358
127907
1900 PS|G
3C716358.2020081 0-0
Certification Oate:
Expiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Certification Dates:
x8118t2020
)811612028
- Shreveport - LA
3C71 6358.2020081 0
098496541
SMART-CERT
This calibration standard has been certified per the May 2012 EPA Traceability Protocol,-12t531.
G1.
Certified Concentration(s)
Concentration
23-7 %
24.0%
Uncertainty
*ol8 %
r0.12 o/o
Analytical Principle Assayed On
08t1?t2on
08t18t2020
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
NDIR
MPA
Nitrogen Balance
Analytical Measurement Data Available Online.
Reference Standard(s)
E50041474.20180504
E80089906.20190405
E80097897.20'171 01 8
Analytical lnstrumentation
co2
o2
NDIR Thermo
Thermo
410i
410i
1162940025 04t03t2020
'1't62980025 07123t2020
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifications. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National lnstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lnternational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specifled or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confidence level of the measurement, unless otherwise noted. This calibration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Services. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
fu--,*"h
Jasmine Godfrey
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Version 02-J, Revised on 2018"09-17
42 of 47
Atfu
"f EC f.JrC.AL GRCiL,?
Location Rio Tinto Kennecott - Masna. UT
QA Data
Source Rentech Boiler SME030
Project No. AST-2023-3178
Parameter(s) VFR
Dete Pitot ID Evidence of
damase?
Evidence of
mis-elisnment?
Calibration or
Renlir renrrired?
t0/4/23 P-t208 no no no
Date Probe or
Thermocounle ID
Reference
Temn. (oF)
Indicated
Tcmo. (oF)Difference Criteria
1014123 P-t208 250.0 2.50 0 O.0o/o + 1.5 Vo (absolute)
Field Balance Check
Date toto4t23
Balance ID:scale-23
Test Weight ID:SLC-4
Certified Weight (g):1000.0
Measured Weight (g):1000.0
Weiglrt Difference (g):0.0
Date
Barometric
Pressure
Evidence of
damase?
Reading
Verified
Calibration or
Reneir reouired?Weather Station Location
t0/4t23 Weather Station no yes no Salt Lake City, UT
Date Meter Box ID Positive Pressure Leak Check
t0t4/23 M5-30 Pass
43 of 47
DGM Calibration-Orifices
Document lt 6?0 AO4
Revisior 223
Effective Dat(12/16/22
lssuinq Department Tech Seryices Pag(lotl
Equipment Detail - Dry Gas Meter
Console lD: M5-30
Meter s/N M5-30
Critical Orifice S/N: 1330
Calibration Detail
Initial Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (Pbr)
Final Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (PbF)
Averaoe Barometric Pressure, in. Ho (Pb)
25.75
25.79
25.77
Critifcal Orifice lD (Y)
K' Factor, ft'.R'/'/ in. wc.min (K)
Vacuum Pressure, in. Hg (V,
lnitial DGM Volume, ft3 (Vm)
Final DGN,4 Volume, ft3 (Vmr)
Total DGt\,4 Volume, ft3 (Vm)
1330-3 1
0.8429
13.0
423.200
438.910
15710
1330-31 1330-25
0.6728
'15.0
478.440
489.350
10.910
1330-25 1330-19
0.5186
17.0
512.800
522.710
9.910
1330-19
0.8429 0.673 0.519
13.0
438 910
454.625
15.715
15.0
489.350
500.160
10.810
17.0
522.710
532.475
9.765
Ambient Temperature, 'F (Ta)
lnitial DGM Temperature, "F (Tm,)
Final DGM Temperature, 'F (Tm,
Averaqe DGM Temperature, "F ( Tm)
66
72
l4
73
66
74
14
74
66
75
75
75
66
75
75
75
66
74
73
74
66
73
73
73
Elapsed Time (O)
Meter Orifice Pressure, in. WC (AH)
Standard Meter volume, fti (Vmstd)
Standard Critical Orifice Volume, ftr Ncr)
f,.4eter Correction Factor (Y)
Tolerance
Orifice Calibration Value (AH @)
Tolerance
Orifice Cal Check
'15.00
3.10
13.5251
14.2107
1.051
0 001
1.673
0.012
15.00
3.10
13.5040
14.2107
1.052
0.003
1.669
0.015
13.00
2.00
9.3284
9 8306
1.054
0.004
1.682
0.002
13.00
2.00
9.2429
9.8306
1.064
0.014
1.682
0.002
15.00
1.20
8.4779
8.7433
1.031
0.018
1 700
0 0.15
15.00
1.20
8.3617
8.7433
'1.046
0.004
1.701
0.017
1.26 195 i.91
vleter Correction Factor m 1.050
)rifice Calibration Value (AH @)1.685
)ositive Pressure Leak Check Yes
Equipment Detail - Thermocouple Sensor
Reference Calibrator Make: Omega
Reference Calibrator Model. CL23A
Reference Calibrator S/N: T-197207
Calibration Detail
Reference Temp.Display Temp Accuracv Difference
oR oF
0
68
100
460
528
560
2
68
100
462
528
560
-4.4
0.0
0.0
2
0
0
223
248
273
683
708
733
225
250
275
685
710
735
-03
-0.3
-0.3
2
2
2
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
1,100
1,200
760
860
960
1,060
1,160
1,260
1,360
1,460
1,560
1,660
303
401
501
601
703
801
903
i,003
1,101
1,204
763
861
961
1,061
1,163
1,261
1,363
1,463
1,561
1,664
-0.4
-0.1
-0.1
-0.'1
-0.3
-0'1
-0.2
-0.2
-0.1
-0.2
3
1
1
1
3
1
3
3
,]
4
Personnel
5/12/2023
44 of 47
Calibration By:
Calibration Date:
R. Burton
45 of 47
Et
s
ff
8
EzEFc.9oEo.EFe
$6
88
<
NX
E
E
S
S
E
S
f
l
S
S
S
E
E
6S
i
R
S
5
E
f
l
h
f
l
f
r
i
H
3
qq
B
q
E
i
E
E
E
E
E
S
P
=
Bg
3
8
e
E
e
S
9
f
l
B
8
A
<.

e
q
q
Cq
q
q
e
q
q
q
a
f
-
B$
E
T
E
E
$
E
S
$
$
E
i
B
;
gf
i
E
f
,
s
$
B
*
s
E
$
H
$
=
gE
$
$
$
$
3
9
$
$
$
i
s
at
sn
E
qQ
c
xa
t
58
t
8a
F
!
Se
e
E
S
9
S
t
P
E
:
t
xd
a
S
s
&
8
B
E
9
B
€
HE
S
E
B
C
P
g
q
i
l
P
>,
9
:
v
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
t
\{
o
!
o
q
!
t
r
a
q
{
P
d
E
a
ra
E
=
q
a
l
l
SS
H
S
S
S
E
H
S
H
H
::
:
:
i
:
R
l
N
i
p
d
d
d
dN
d
d
d
d
d
d
b
t
i
t
ei
4
q
q
4
O
q
EaE
S
Eq
E
g
S
E
E
E
E
E
E
c
E
:
fr
R
€
B
{
$
q
t
$
E
B
B
$
,
NH
H
H
B
h
S
H
H
H
;
F
H
:
q
e
33
t
r
E
I
a
8
8
9
$
"
fi
E
S
E
E
i
B
g
T
B
E
B
F
!
6
S;
8
E
E
E
8
S
3
8
8
O
dd
d
d
d
N
d
d
d
d
d
N
N
i
ff
f
i
R
E
;
E
E
X
H
:
E
$
E
z
sB
s
B
i
B
E
E
a
i
s
i
B
EIEItP
46

of

47
UTAH DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL OUAUW
n[CI - 5 2C2i
DIVISION OF AIR QUALITV
47 of47
R&*Timto ftio Tir{o l(erxlegottt.Edr Copper, LLC
.t70A0a,frd( Pxtilay
Sc.*rJqda*, Uf SrltrB
USA
801-s69-6331
UTAH DEPABTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DEt; - A ?|,Z3
[{an I b" ( i't eteli,
DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
Mr- ByoeBid, Diredq
Department of Environ mental Quality
Division of Air Quality
P.O. Box 144820
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4820
4lec2o23 Alln: &.Paul Xorris
RE: ComdianceTesteport
]blnan Boler{*l}61
fifib V Operaling Pem*f llo. SlllXXXIXIl4
l(emeod tltdr Coppe - Smelbr Facmy
Dear Mr. Bird,
iGrndtt t*r Copper lLC(iterrco@pernrrca sbd(bslhg ot lhe Hoknan
Boler on Ociober 5, M as re6ied bf Trte V OperafU l:M ib-
36UIXIXXXI- The ECing uas oorftcted tuforhg fredres qfied h /l() CFR
0A nppent A- The srlmtay repod for [E bstrg proetres Est resu]ls is
dacrred for gffil tt ilft 60 days of oorpletin d E e tes{t6- Resl*s of lhe
bs{irg dernssfide tp }bman Boaerb h snffare rfrr the perritenArion
lnls"
Based m lrftrmdixr and beEf fumed afrer rmmabb trq..tLy, Se statements
and hbnrdim cor&dned in 0[s doculpnt ae tue, erate, and coqnete
(Rgn-rl$SO-
Should you have any questions or need further information regarding the evenl,
please conlact me or Sean Daly a|801-2O4-2563.
Yorss-mdy.
L,4 beia){ o"f
Generd Uarag€r, lleids
Rio T'into Kenne@tt Utah Copper, LLC 4700 Daybreak Pad$ray, Soulh Jqdan. UT 84009
AIliffirc
r i { ,: i i 1',,, r , , ; i ;
Source Test Report
Rio Tinto Kennecott
4700 Daybreak Parkway
South Jordan. UT 84095
Source Tested: Holman Boiler SME026
Test Date: October 5,2023
Project No. AST-2023-3 17 6
Prepared By
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2210 S, Suite E
West Valley City, UT 84120
UTAH DEPARTi,'IENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALTTY
:i .l
AIfu
TE*HNICAL GNOUP Sowce Test Report
Test Program Summary
Regulatory Information
Permil Nos.
Source Information
DAQE-AN103460060-21
Title V Operating Permit 3500030004
Source Name
Holman Boiler
Contact Information
Source ID
SMEO26
Target Parameter
NOx
Test Location
Kennecott Utah Copper, LLC
4700 Daybreak Parkway
South Jordan, UT 84009
Jenny Esker
j [e-mail]
(801) s69-6494
Sean Daly
sean.daly3 @riotinto.com
(801) 204-2s63
Test Company
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley City, UT 84120
Project Manager
Charles Horton
charles.horton@al liancetg.com
(3s2) 663-7s68
Field Team Leader
Rob Burton
[e-mail]
(224) 3s8-s0ss
QA/QC Manager
Kathleen Shonk
katie. [e-mail]
(812) 4s2-478s
Report Coordinator
Sarah Perry
sarah.perry@al liancetg.com
AST-2023-3 I 76 RTK-Magn4 UT Page i
Atfu Source Test Report
C e r tifi ca tion State me ntTECHNICAL GNCLJ tr
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) has completed the source testing as described in this report. Results
apply only to the source(s) tested and operating condition(s) for the specific test date(s) and time(s) identified within
this report. All results are intended to be considered in their entirety, and Alliance is not responsible for use of less
than the complete test report without written consent. This report shall not be reproduced in full or in part without
written approval from the customer.
To the best of my knowledge and abilities, all information, facts and test data are corect. Data presented in this
report has been checked for completeness and is accurate, error-free and legible. Onsite testing was conducted in
accordance with approved internal Standard Operating Procedures. Any deviations or problems are detailed in the
relevant sections in the test report.
This report is only considered valid once an authorized representative ofAlliance has signed in the space provided
below; any other version is considered draft. This document was prepared in portable document format (.pdf) and
contains pages as identified in the bottom footer of this document.
Charles Horton, QSTI
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Date
AST-2023-3 l 76 RTK - Magn4 UT Page ii
TECHNICAL GNOUP Source Test Report
Table ofContents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
l I Process/Control System Descriptions .............. l-l
1.3 Site-Specific Test Plan & Notification................... ................ l-l
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and2 - Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate..... 3-l
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide ............... 3-l
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 - Moisture Content......... .................... 3-l
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E - Nitrogen Oxides.......... .................. 3-l
3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Gas Dilution System Certification. ..........,.........3-2
3.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3A' and 7E.............................3-2
LIST OF TABLES
APPENDICES
Appendix A Sample Calculations
Appendix B Field Data
Appendix C Quality Assurance/Quality Control Data
Appendix D Process Operating/Control System Data
AST-2023-3r76 RTK-Magna,UT Page iii
AIIfu Source Test Report
IntroductionT=CF-iNIOAL GNCLP
1.0 Introduction
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by Rio Tinto Kennecott (RTK) to conduct compliance
testing at the Smelter facility located in Magna, Utah. The facility operates under the Utah Department of
Environmental Quality, Division of Air Quality (UDAQ) Approval Order (AO) DAQE-AN103460060-21and the
Title V Operating Permit No. 350030004. Testing was conducted to determine the emission rate of nitrogen oxides
(NOx) from the Holman Boiler designated as SME026.
l.l Process/ControlSystemDescriptions
The smelter facility refines, and processes copper slurry concentrates to produce copper anodes. Many of the
processes involved with the production of copper require steam including the acid plant compressors, the steam
turbine generator, and the anodes refining reduction process. High pressure, superheated steam is supplied to the
process by the smelter powerhouse which includes the Holman Boiler.
1.2 Project Team
Personnel involved in this project are identified in the following table.
Table l-1: Project Team
f 3 Site-Specific Test Plan & Notification
Testing was conducted in accordance with the Site-Specific Test Plan (SSTP) submitted to UDAQ by RTK.
RTK Personnel Sean Daly
Alliance Personnel
Rob Burton
Dillon Brown
Jacob Mclain
AST-2023-3 l 76 RTK - Magna, UT Page l-l
AIfuTECHf-lfSAL GnCL-F Source Test Report
Summary ofResults
2.0 Summary of Results
Alliance conducted compliance testing at the Smelter facility located in Magna, Utah on October 5,2023. Testing
consisted of determining the emission rate of NOx from the Holman Boiler designated as SME026.
Table 2-l provides a summary of the emission testing results with comparisons to the applicable permit limits. Any
difference between the summary results Iisted in the following table and the detailed results contained in appendices
is due to rounding for presentation.
Table 2-1: Summary of Results
itrogen Oxides Data
Concentration, ppmvd
Emission Rate, lb/hr
' Permit Limit, lb/hr
Percent of Limit, 7o
37.53
7.6
3s.39
7.0
35.09
6.9
36.00
7.2
t4
5l
AST-2023-3 I 76 RTK - Magna, UT Page2-l
AIiatrce
Source Test Reporl
'l'esting Me thodologl,
3.0 Testing Methodology
The ernission testing prograrn was conducted in accordance with the test nrethods listed in Table 3-l Method
descriptions are provided below while quality assurance/quality control data is provided in Appendix D.
Table 3-l: Source Testing Methodology
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and 2 - Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate
The sampling location and number of traverse (sampling) points were selected in accordance with U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method l. To deternrine the miniurum number of traverse points, the upstream and downstream
distances were equated into equivalent diarrreters and cornpared to Figure l-2 in U.S. EPA Reference Test Method l.
Full velocity traverses were conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 to determine the
average stack gas velocity pressure, static pressure and temperature. The velocity and static pressure measurenlent
system consisted of a pitot tube and inclined manometer. The stack gas temperature was measured with a K-type
thernrocouple and pyronteter.
Stack gas velocity pressure and tenrperature readings were recorded during each test rur1. The data collected was
utilized to calculate the volumetric flow rate in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2.
3.2 tl.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3.{ - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide
The oxygen (O:) and carbon dioxide (COz) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test
Method 3A,. Data was collected online and reported in one-rninute averages. The sanrpling system consisted of a
stainless-steel probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning systern and the identified gas analyzer. The gas
conditioning systern was a non-contact condenser used to rerxove moisture from the stack gas. If an unheated
Tef'lon sample line was used, then a portable norr-contact condenser was placed in the system directly after the
probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon sanrple line was used. The quality control nreasures are described in Section 3.6.
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 - Moisture Content
The stack gas nroisture content (BWS) was determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4. The
gas conditioning train consisted of a series of chilled irnpingers. Priol to testing, each inrpinger was filled with a
known quantity of water or silica gel. Each inrpinger was analyzed gravimetlically before and after each test run on
the sarne balance to deternrine the anrount ofnroisture condensed.
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E - Nitrogen Oxides
The nitrogen oxides (NOx) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E. Data
was collected online and reporled in one-minute averages. The sampling systern consisted of a stainless-steel probe,
Parameter U.S. EPA Reference
Test Methods Notes/Remarks
Volurrretric Flow Rate l&2 Full Velocity Traverses
Oxygen / Carbon Dioxide 3A Instlurnental Analysis
Moisture Content 4 Gravimetric Analysis
Nitrogen Oxides 7E lnstrunrental Analvsis
Gas Dilution Systenr Cenification 20s
AST-2023-3 I 76 RTK - Magna, UT Pagc 3- I
ffiraAIlEe
i.l
Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning systenr and the identified gas analyzer. The gas conditioning system was a
non-contact condenser used to remove rnoisture frorn the stack gas. If an unheated Teflon sample line was used,
then a portable non-contact condenser was placed in the system directly after the probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon
sample line was used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.6.
3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Gas Dilution System Certification
A calibration gas dilution system field check was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Method 205.
Multiple dilution rates and total gas flow rates were utilized to force the dilution system to perfonn two dilutions on
each rnass flow controller. The diluted calibration gases were sent directly to the analyzer, and the analyzer response
recorded in an electronic field data sheet. The analyzer response agreed withirt 2Yo of the actual diluted gas
concentration. A second Protocol I calibration gas, with a cylinder concentration within 10% of one of the gas
divider settings described above, was introduced directly to the analyzer, and the analyzer response recorded in an
electronic field data sheet. The cylinder concentration and the analyzer response agreed within 27o. These steps
rvere repeated three (3) times. Copies of the Method 205 data can be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality
Control Appendix.
3.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3A and 7E
Cylinder calibration gases used met EPA Protocol I (+l- 2%) standards. Copies of all calibration gas certificates can
be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix.
Low Level gas was introduced directly to the analyzer. After adjusting the analyzer to the Low-Level gas
concentration and once the analyzer reading was stable, the analyzer value was recorded. This process was repeated
for the High-Level gas. For the Calibration Error Test, Low, Mid, and High Level calibration gases were
sequentially introduced directly to the analyzer. All values were within 2.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5
ppnw loh absolute d ifference.
High or Mid Level gas (whichever was closer to the stack gas concentration) was introduced at the probe and the
time required for the analyzer reading to reach 95 percent or 0.5 ppmv/%o (whichever rvas less restrictive) of the gas
concentration was recorded. The analyzer reading was obserued until it reached a stable value, and this value was
recorded. Next, Low Level gas was introduced at the probe and the time required for the analyzer reading to
decrease to a value within 5.0 percent or 0.5 ppnrv/%o (whichever was less restrictive) was recorded. If the Low-
Level gas was zero gas, the response was 0.5 ppnvl%o or 5.0 percent of the upscale gas concentl'ation (whichever
was less restrictive). The analyzer reading was observed until it reached a stable value and this value was recorded.
The measurement system response tirne and initial system bias were determined from these data. The System Bias
was within 5.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 pprnv/%o absolute difference.
High or Mid Level gas (whichever was closer to the stack gas concentration) was introduced at the probe. After the
analyzer response was stable, the value was recorded. Next, Low Level gas was introduced at the probe, and the
analyzer value recorded once it reached a stable response. The System Bias was within 5.0 percent of the
Calibration Span or 0.5 ppnllYo absolute difference or the data was invalidated and the Calibration Error Test and
System Bias were repeated.
Drift between pre- and post-run System Bias was within 3 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/%o absolute
difference. Ifthe drift exceeded 3 percent or 0.5 pprnv/%o, the Calibration Error Test and System Bias were repeated.
Source Test Report
Testing Methodology
AST-2023-3 I 76 RTK- Magna, UT Page 3-2
Atfu
il _ l : ./a n s Source Test Report
Testing MethodoloRy
To determine the number of sampling points, a gas stratification check was conducted prior to initiating testing. The
pollutant concentrations were measured at six traverse points (as described in Method l). Each traverse point was
sampled for a minirnum of twice the system response time.
If the pollutant concentration at eacll traverse point did not differ more than 5 percent or 0.5 ppmv/0.3%o (whichever
was less restrictive) of the average pollutant concentration, then single point sampling was conducted during the test
runs. If the pollutant concentration did not meet these specifications but differed less than l0 percent or 1.0
ppmvl0.5%o frorn the average concentration, then three (3) point sampling was conducted (stacks less than 7.8 feet in
diameter - 16.7, 50.0 and 83.3 percent of the measurement line; stacks greater than 7.8 feet in diameter - 0.4, 1.0,
and 2.0 meters from the stack wall). lf the pollutant concentration differed by more than l0 percent or 1.0
pprnv/0.5% from the average concentration, then sampling was conducted at a minimum of twelve (12) traverse
points. Copies of stratification check data can be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix.
An NOz - NO converter check was performed on the analyzer at the completion of testing. An approximately 50
pprn nitrogen dioxide cylinder gas was introduced directly to the NOx analyzer and the instrument response was
recorded in an electronic data sheet. The instrument response was within +/- l0 percent of the cylinder
concentration.
A Data Acquisition Systern with battery backup was used to record the instrument response in one (l) minute
averages. Thedatawascontinuouslystoredasa*.CSVfileinExcelformatontheharddriveofacomputer. Atthe
completion of testing, the data was also saved to the Alliance server. All data was reviewed by the Field Team
Leader before leaving the facility. Once amiving at Alliance's office, all written and electronic data was
relinquished to the report coordinator and then a final review was performed by the Project Manager.
AST-2023-3 I 76 RTK- Magna, UT Page 3-3
Appendix A
Example CalculationsTECl."f ilt{6AL GHGUP
Location Rio Tinto Kennecott - Magna, UT
Source Holman Boiler (SME026)
Project No. 202,33fi6
Run No. I
Parameter{s) VFR
Meter Pressure (Pm), in. Hg
AHPm: Pb+136-
where,
Pb 25.93 : barometric pressure, in. Hg
AH 1.000 : pressure differential oforifice, in H2O
rrTIS-: in. ug
Absolute Stack Gas Pressure (Ps), in. Hg
PgPs = Pb *-:-;-. t3.6
where,
Pb L: barometric pressure, in. Hg
Pg__L: static pressure, in. H2O
Ps 25.94 : in. Hg
Standard Meter Volume (Vmstd), dscf
l7.636xVmxPmxY
vmsto =-Iil-
where,
Y 1.050 : meter conection factor
Vr@:metervolume, cf
Pm 26.00 : absolute meter pressure, in. Hg
Tm 523.1 _: absolute meter temperature, oR
v.'tdTGiT :d."f
Standard Wet Volume (Vwstd), scf
where,
Vwstd: 0.04716 x Vlc
Mc 144.1 = weight of H2O collected, g
Vwstd 6.796 = scf
Moisture Fraction (BWSsat), dinensionless (lheoretical at saturated conditions)
1063?-(##)
BWSsat :
-where, Pt
Ts 365.5 : stack temperature, oF
pt--1il= absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
BWSsat 1.000 : dimensionless
Moisture Fraction (BWS), dimensionless
Vwstd
BWS =(Vwstd f Vmstd)
Vwstd 6.796 = standard wet volume, scf
v..tdZ83-= standard meter volume, dscf
Bws -d1 72- = dimensionless
where,
tuTgCY"JT{ICAL GRGUP
Location Rio Tinto Kennecott - Masnr. UT
Source Eolman Boiler (SME026)
Project No. 2023-3176
Run No. I
Parameter(s) lTR
Moisture Fraction (BWS), dimensionless
BWS : BWSmsd unless BWSsat < BWSmsd
where,
BWSsat 1.000 : moisture fraction (theoretical at saturated conditions)
BWSmsd 0.172 : moisture fraction (measured)Bws-o..i-
Molecular Weight (DRY) (Md), lb/lb-mole
Md : (0.44 x o/oCO2) + (0.32 x o/oO2) + (0.28(100- o/oCO2 - o/oO2))
where,
COrA: carbon dioxide concentration, %o
O, A : oxygen concentralion, Yo
Md 29.65 : lb/lb mol
Appendix A
Example Calculations
Molecular Weight (WET) (Ms), Ib/lb-mole
Ms = Md (1 - BWS) + 18.015 (BWS)
where,
Md--.LBwsg
Ms 27.65
= molecular weight @RY), lb/lb mol
= moisture fraction, dimensionless
= lb/lb mol
x (A P t/2) avg x
= pitot tube coeflicient
: average pre/post test velocity head ofstack gas, (in. H2O)t/2
= average pre/post test absolute stack temperature, oR
= absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
: molecular weight of stack gas, lb/lb mol
= ft/sec
Average Velocity (Vs), ftlsec
where,
Vs:85.49 x Cp
Cp 0.84
^Pv,--f;iii-XTptT
Mr........lL
Vs 26.8
Average Stack Gas Flow at Stack Conditions (Qa), acfm
Qa=60xVsxAs
where,
Vs 26.8 = stack gas velocity, ff/sec
es ag.48 : cross-sectional area ofstack, ft2
Qal51;798=acfm
Average Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions (Qs), dscfm
Qsd= 17.636xQax(l -BWS)x Ps
Ts
Qa 61,798 : average stack gas flow at stack conditions, acfm
BWS 0.172 : moisture fraction, dimensionless
ptG-: absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
Tt L: average pre/post test absolute stack temperature, oR
Qs 28,363 : dscfm
Appendix A
Example CalculationsTECI"{N!CAL GFIOUF
Location Rio Tinto Kennecott - Maqna, UT
Source Holman Boiler (SME026)
Project No. 2023-3176
Run No. I
Parameter{s) VFR
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Check (Yqa), percent
Yqa =
where,
**.)
x 100
Y 1.05 = meter correction factor, dimensionless
o--06-= run time, min.
Vm 35.502 = total meter volume, dcf
r,n
............F:
absolute meter temperature, oR
AH@ 1.685 : orifice meter calibration coefficient, in. H2O
PbA: barometric pressure, in. Hg
AH urg-]1[= average pressure differential of orifice, in I{2O
Md 29.65 : molecular weight (DRY), lblb mol
(A H)t"--Iii-: average square root pressure differential of orifice, (in. FI2O)r/2
Yqu_&:percent
0.0319xTmx29
tu
TECI-I\.}llSAL G}AOUP
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - Magna, UT
Source: Holman Boiler (SME026)
Project No.z 2023-3176
Run No. /IVlethod Run I / Method 3A
Or - Outlet Concentration (CoJ, %" dry
co.: (co5,_cs)x (dkr)
where,
Cou.A: average analyzer value during test,%o dry
C, 0.21 : average of pretest & posttest zero responses,%o dry
CMA 12.00 =actualconcentrationofcalibrationgas,%odry
CM 1 l.9l : average ofpretest & posttest calibration responses, o/o dry
Co, 3.53 = Oz Concentration,o/o dry
Appendix A
Example Calculations
AppendixA
Example Calculations
Source: Holman Boiler (SME026)
Project No.z 2023-3176
Run No. /lllethod Run I / Method 3,{
COr - Outlet Concentration (CcoJ, o/o dry
cco= (co6,-ce)x ( dhrr)
where,
Co6. 9.45 = average analyzervalue during test, %o dry
C"A= average of pretest & posttest zero responses,o/odry
C"o_ 11.85 =actual concentration ofcalibration gas,%o dry
CM 11.81 = average ofpretest & posttest calibration responses, To dry
Cco 9.46 = COz Concentration, % dry
Appendix A
Example Calculations
TECH\]CAL GRQUs
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - Magna, UT
Source: Holman Boiler (SME026)
Project No.z 2023-3176
Run No. /lVlethod Run I / Method 7E
NOx - Outlet Concentration (CnoJ, ppmvd
C*o*: (Co5,-c6)x / ,C*,, r\ CCTrc'I,,
where,
Cou,_A: average analyzer value during test, ppmvd
Co 0.95 : average ofpretest & posttest zero responses, ppmvd
CMA 50.00 : actual concentration ofcalibration gas, ppmvd
CM 48.38 : average ofpretest & posttest calibration responses, ppmvd
CNo* 37.53 : NOx Concentration, ppmvd
NOx - Outlet Emission Rate (ER16,), lb/hr
oo.^ - CNo.xMWxQsx60#x28.32 #
where,
C*o*-[[: NOx - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
MW 46.0055 : NOx molecularweight, g/g-mole
Qs 28,363 = stack gas volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, dscfm
ERr.no* 7.6 : lb/hr
UTAH DEPARTMENT OF
DEC - 4 ?A23
DIVISION OFAIR OUALITY
tu
TECHNiCAL GR(}[..,Ii3
Emissions Calculations
Location Rio Tinto Kennecott - Magna, UT
Source Holman Boiler (SME026)
Project No. 2023-3 I 76
Run Number Runl Run2 Run3 Average
Date
Start Time
Stop Time
totst23
l0:00
I l:00
tll5123 r0l5123
ll.47 13:10
12:47 14:10
Input Data - Outlet
Volumetric Flow Rate (Ml-4), dscfm Qs 28,363 27,589 27,473 27,808
Calculated Data - Outlet
Oz Concentration, %o dry co, 3.53 3.39 3.32 3.41
COz Concentration, 7o dry cco, 9.46 9.87 9.94 9.76
NOx Concentration, ppmvd
NOx Emission Rate, lb/hr
CNo*
ERuo"
37.53
7.6
35.39
7.0
35.09 36.00
6.9 7.2
&TECHI":1CAL GFOLj.5
Method 1 Data
Is.rion Rio Titrto Kemott - Mr
SNre lldmm Boiler (SME026)
Prejecl No. 2023-3176
Drt.
DuclOriertrtioo: Venical
DuctD6igE Circolil
Disrme frem Frr Wrll to Outsidc of Pod: 86.00 in
Nipple lrngth: 2.00 in
Depth ofDuct: 84.00 in
Coss Secilonrl Arer ofDuct: 38.48 ftr
No. of Ter Pons: -----l-
Numb€rofRcsding!pcrPoitrt: I
DLtmeA: l0O fi
Dbtuc€ A Doct DirmeaeB: 1.4 (Eurt be > 0.5)
Di.r"*" Br----'iJl-fr
Disreme B Ducr Dirmde n:----IJ-1mur bc, 2.y
Midmum liumb€r ofTrrrcre poirt., ----ii-
AchrlNumbcrofTrrverePointl 16
Meesrcr(Initirl sd Drlc): DBR
Reviflrr (Initisl rnd Dst"),____M_
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS
Nufrbet oftarse poing on a diafr*r
I
3
1
5
6
7
8
9
l0
ll
t7
2 3 1 5 6 1 8 9 l0 ll 12
1.t.6-6.7-4.4-3.2-2.6-2.1
85.4 -- 25.O -- rJ.6 -- 10.5 - 8.2 - 6.1
75.0 - 29.6 .- 19.4 - 14.6 - ll.8
95.6-80.6-65.8-35.6
89.5-17.4-61.4:: :. ':' ,, il , i:-i_:_:
- 93.3
- 919
*Petent ofstack diametetftoil inside\|all to tNerse pint
Tnrtm
Point
o/o of Distee from
sdl
I
2
3
4
6
1
8
9
l0
ll
3.2
10.5
19.1
32.3
61.1
80.6
89.5
'1'
.'
2.69
8.82
16.30
27.t3
56.87
67.70
75.18
t,j,
4 t|t6
l0 l3/16
l8 5/16
29 Va
58 7t8
69 t1n6
77 3il6
,,
.!,u
@*tE,
Shck Diagnm
A= l0i.
B = 14.1 ft.
Dcpth of Dud = 84 i[
Crc$ SdioMl Area
oaaaaaoo
Upircah
DIS{rbance
tuTtrCIIt{ ICAL GIFOUP
Cyclonic Flow Check
Location Rio Tinto Kennecott - Masna" UT
Source Holman Boiler (SME026)
Project No. 2023-3176
Date l0l523
Sample Point Angle(AH))
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
n
12
t3
14
15
t6
Averase
8
-5
-4
J
I
-l
2
6
4
2
2
0
4
-7
-7
J
3.7
Method 2 Data
I - r-, I'r i; r{ L rt 5 (.1 i. -
Location Rio Tinto Kennecott - Maena. UT
Source Holman Boiler (SME026)
Project No. 2023-3176
Traverse No.
Date
Status
Start Time
Stop Time
Leak Check
I
t0t5/23
VALID
9:17
9:27
Pass
2
t0/5/23
VALID
l0:29
l0:38
Pass
3
t0/5/23
VALID
I l:55
l2:03
Pass
4
t0/5/23
VALID
l2:36
l2:48
Pass
Traverse Point AP
(in- WC)
Ts
10F)
AP Ts
roF)
AP
rin wr)
Ts
/oF)
AP
1in WC\
Ts
/oF)
al
2
3
4
5
6
7
E
bt
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0.09
0. l3
0.15
0.15
0.19
0.tI
0.10
0.10
0.09
0. l4
0.15
0.16
0.13
0.13
0.t0
0.10
327
365
378
382
386
387
388
389
326
333
340
343
362
371
379
388
0. l0
0.1 I
0. t3
0. l4
0. t4
0. l0
0.1 I
0.1 I
0.09
0.12
0.12
0. l4
0. l5
0. l2
0.1 l
0.09
334
341
355
362
364
370
375
385
345
360
365
372
373
380
385
387
0.08
0.10
0.1 I
0.l l
0. l4
0.t5
0.12
0. t0
0.07
0. t0
0.1 I
0.1 t
0.13
0.1 I
0.1 I
0. l0
320
328
333
34t
352
364
37t
385
364
365
37'7
382
384
387
389
389
0.09
0.12
0.t2
0.1 I
0. r3
0.il
0.l t
0. t0
0. t0
0.tI
0. r3
0. t4
0. l4
0. l0
0.1 I
0.1 I
34s
360
365
372
373
380
385
387
334
341
355
362
364
370
375
385
Run No.2 3 Averag€
Square Root of AP, (in, WC)tn (APt"
Av€rage AP, in. WC (AP)
PitotTubeCoelficicnt (Cp)
Barometric Presure (Pb)
Static Presure, in. lrVC (Pg)
Stack Pre$ure, in. Hg (Ps)
Average Temperature, oF (Ts)
Average Temperature, oR (Ts)
MeasuredMoistureFraction (BWSmsd)
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat)
MoistureFraction (BWS)
02 Concentration, T" (Or)
CO2 Concentration, To (COz)
lltolecular Weight, lb/lb-mole (dry) (Md)
Molecular Weight, lb/lb-mole (wet) (Ms)
Velocity, ftlsec (vs)
VFR at stack conditions, acfm (Qa)
VFR aa saandard conditions, sclh (Qsw)
VFR at standard conditions, scfm (Qsw)
VFR at standard conditions. dscfm (Osd)
0.347
0.t2
0.840
25.94
0.02
25.94
365.5
825.2
0.172
1.000
0.172
3.53
9.46
29.65
2'1.65
26.8
6t,798
2,0ss,636
34,261
)R 161
0.336
0.tt
0.840
25.94
0.02
25.94
365. I
824.8
0.164
1.000
0.164
3.39
9.87
29.71
27.79
25.8
5q 5)?
1,980,940
33,0t 6
27 589
0.333
0.1 I
0.840
25.94
0.02
25.94
365. I
824.8
0.162
1.000
0.162
3.32
9.94
29.72
27.83
25.6
59,|2
I,967,245
32,787
2'r 473
0.339
0.12
0.840
25.94
0.02
25.94
365.3
824.9
0.166
1.000
0.166
3.41
9.76
29.70
27.'76
26.O
60,145
2,001,274
33,355
27.809
tu
T=C*1 l.,l rCAL GfiOUrl
Method 4 Data
lrcation Rio Tinto Kenoftosou.."ffi
Dfni..r N^
'OtLtl?6D"r"-4"n.'
Con3olc UniB / Mdhod ft3 M.l
lun No.
)stc
itatur
ibd Time
ind Timc
lun Timq min (0)
ftder lD
I
t0/5t23
VALID
l0:00
I l:00
60
2
lu5n3
VALID
ll:41
l2:47
60
m5-30
3
t0t5t23
VALID
l3:10
l4:1 0
60
m5-30
lteter CorNtion Fxdo. (Y)
)rifice Calibralioo Vdue (dH @)
lfN Vacuum, in. Hg
>n.r lsk Chp.k fil/min aar nrr Ia..)
I .050
1.685
t5
0 001
t.050
1.685
l5
0.002
1.050
1.685
l5
Volume, ft3
0
t0
t5
20
30
35
,t0
{5
50
60
lotsl Meter 1
616.533
6t9.487
622.2t4
625.545
628.612
631.584
634.827
637.584
640.529
643.214
646.578
649.545
652.035
652.299
655.125
658.452
66r.314
664.287
667.829
670.428
673.546
676.485
679.538
682.547
685.487
688.41 7
688.925
691.524
694.678
697.825
700.t29
103.482
706 384
709.4t6
7t2.289
715.376
718.684
722.425
724.649
35 774
femperrlure,
0
s
l0
l5
20
25
30
35
.t0
{5
50
5a
60
lverage Tmperaturq "F Gm)
lverrge Temperature, "P CIm)
!titrimum Temperaturq "F
trrrimnm Tcmnerrrurc- oF
Mder
62
62
62
63
63
63
63
64
64
64
64
65
65
63
523
62
65
Probe Filter Vlcuum
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Imp. Exi
64
60
56
56
56
56
55
54
54
54
54
53
56
53
64
Meter
73
73
73
74
74
74
74
75
75
75
76
76
76
74
534
73
76
Protre Filter Vtcuum
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Imp. Eri
62
62
62
59
59
55
55
55
55
55
56
56
57
58
55
Metcr
7l
7l
7t
72
72
73
73
73
74
74
74
74
74
73
532
7t
74
Probe Filter Vacuum
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Imp. Eri
64
59
55
55
55
5J
54
54
54
55
55
56
56
56
54
Sarometric Pr6strre, in. Hg (Pb)
lteter Orilie Pr6sure, in. WC (AH)
Iteter Pr6sure, in. Hg (Pm)
itandard Mdervolume. ft3 (Vmstd)
25.93
1.000
26.00
25.93
1.000
26.00
25.85
1.000
25.92
32 209
Itrllylis TJpe
.mpitrger I, PrdPost TBt, g
impinger 2, Pre/P6t Test, g
impingcr 3, Pre/Post Test, g
Impidger {, Pre/Post T6t, g
y'olume Water Collected, mL (Vlc)
iundant WaterVolume, d (V$std)
vloisture Froction M@sor€d (BWS)
36 Molsuhr Weight,lbnEmole (drJ) (Md)
trnM adrir,4]:^6 4f,6-L wornA rud.\
Crari
H20
H20
Empty
697.0
7 19.7
686.5
gRi 9
816.4
729.a
690.0
995 0
119.4
t0.l
3.5
H20
H20
EnpI
Silica
884.1
760.t
638.0
956 7
990.6
769.5
643.3
911 3
106.5
9.4
5.3
146
1120
H20
Enpt]
Silica
826.7
769.5
643.3
97 r.3
948.1
773.9
644.5
976.4
121.4
4.4
1.2
5.1
144.1
6.796
0.t72
29.65
l8
135.8
6.40.t
0. I 6.r
29.7 |
2.5
t32.1
6.230
0.162
29.72
t5
tu
TE 6 rtN lcA [- G F*u *^*,o*
Sourcc:
Project No,:
Dste:
RunL-RMData
Time
Unit
Or - Outlet
"/o dry
Valid
3.64
12.00
0.18
o.23
0.2t
I t.90
ll.91
I t.9l
3.5'l
3.54
3.53
3.52
3.52
3.61
3.64
3.54
3.57
3.67
3.66
3.64
3.61
3.60
3.54
3.53
3.58
3.56
3.59
3.61
3.57
3.52
3.49
3.55
3.63
3.63
3.54
3.54
3.60
3.63
3.66
3.60
3.62
3.63
3.65
3.69
3.70
3.67
3.69
3.72
3.78
3.79
3.72
3.',l0
3.73
3.71
3.'13
3.70
3.78
3.77
3.',?3
3.68
3.67
3.66
3.',!5
3.73
3.73
3;t5
3;15
3.73
9.45 36.55
u.85 50.00
0.16 l.0l
0.14 0.88
0.15 0.95
ll.80 48.14
11.82 48.62
n.8l 48.38
CO:-Oudet NOr-Outlct
!. dry ppmd
Valid Valid
Urcorrcled Run Aver.gc (Ce)
Cal Gas Conccntration (Cp1)
Prct6t Systcm Z€ro RepoNe
PsttBt SystcE Zcro R$pome
Averege Zcro Rcpoose (Co)
Prct6t Systcm Cd Repotrse
PGtt6t Systcm Cel Rqponse
Average Cal Reponsc (Cy)
Correted Run
10r00
l0;01
l0:02
l0:03
l0:04
l0:05
l0:06
l0:07
l0:08
l0:09
l0:10
l0:l I
l0:12
l0: l3
l0: l4
l0:15
l0: l6
l0:17
l0:18
l0: l9
l0:20
l0:21
l0:22
l0:23
l0:24
l0:25
l0:26
l0:27
l0;28
l0:29
l0:30
l0:31
l0:32
l0:33
l0:34
l0:35
l0:36
l0:37
lO:38
lO:39
l0:4b
l0:41
lO:42
l0:43
l0:44
l0:45
l0:46
l0:47
l0:48
l0:49
l0:50
l0:51
l0:52
l0:53
l0:54
l0:55
l0:56
l0:57
l0:58
l0:59
9.41
9.45
9.46
9.46
9.47
9.43
9.40
9.45
9.45
9.39
9.41
9.42
9.43
9.45
9.48
9.49
9.46
9.49
9.47
9.45
9.50
9.53
9.55
9.50
9.46
9.46
9.53
9.52
9.49
9.48
9.45
9.49
9.49
9.48
9.46
9.46
9.44
9.45
9.44
9.44
9.4t
9.40
9.43
9.48
9.45
9.44
9.44
9.4?
9.43
9.39
9.42
9.44
9.46
9.48
9.42
9.41
9.44
9.42
9.45
9.44
38.01
37.55
36.77
37.62
36.98
36.93
37.86
37.34
37.07
36.28
36.62
36.80
35.78
36.41
36.33
35.68
37.41
36.00
35.6'1
36.08
35.86
36.60
36.14
36.27
36.1 I
37.55
37.10
36.82
36.53
35.89
36.53
35.90
35.78
36.O4
36.83
36.82
36.26
37. l0
36.02
35.77
35.36
36.11
35.60
38.02
37.00
36.85
36.96
36.53
36.06
36.62
35.63
36.4t
36.41
35.57
35.94
35.78
36.53
36.40
37.06
37.q2
turCG}It*ICAL EFiOUF
Run2-RMData
Iflrtion:
Source:
Proj€ct Nc:
Drac:
Time
Unit
Or-0utlet COr-Outlct NOt-Outl€t
Yodry f"dry ppmvd
Uncorrcted Run Av€rrgc (Cd)
Cel Grs Clmcntntion (Cy1)
Prct6t Slatcm Zcro Response
PGttgt SFtcm ro Rcsponse
Avcrrge Zero RspoNc (Co)
PrctBt System Cd Rdponsc
Pstt6i Systcm Cal Rsponse
Avcrage Cal Reponse (Cy)
ll:47
I l:48
I t:49
ll:50
ll:51
ll:52
I l:53
I l:54
I l:55
ll:56
tt'.5'l
I l:58
I l:59
l2:00
l2:Ol
l2:O2
l2:O3
l2:M
l2:05
12:06
12:07
l2:08
12:09
l2:10
t2:l I
12:12
12:13
l2:14
l2:15
l2: l6
12:17
l2:18
l2tl9
l2:2O
l2:21
12:22
12:23
12:24
l2:25
12:26
12:27
12:28
12:29
l2:3O
l2:31
l2:32
l2:33
l2:34
l2:35
12:36
l2:37
12:38
12:39
12:4O
l2:41
l2:42
12:43
12:44
l2:45
l2:46
3.52 9.88 34.58
12.00
0.23
0.t9
0.2t
I l.9l
I1.95
ll93
3.40
3.42
3.47
3.50
3.47
3.49
3.48
3.41
3.45
3.5r
3.48
3.50
3.53
3.53
3.49
3.51
3.54
3.57
3.54
3.56
3.5'.1
3.55
3.50
3.52
3.54
3.54
3.48
3.51
3.53
3.51
3.52
3.56
3.51
3.60
3.54
3.49
3.50
3.56
3.58
3.5't
3.57
3.56
3.56
3.61
3.60
3.50
3.47
3.49
3.47
3.53
3.56
3.57
3.53
3.55
3.55
3.61
3.56
3.52
3.53
3.57
11.85
0.t4
0.15
0.!5
I 1.82
I 1.85
il84
9.88
9.93
9.91
9.88
9.9t
9.90
9.92
9.94
9.94
9.88
9.90
9.88
9.87
9.88
9.89
9.90
9.85
9.85
9.87
9,85
9.86
9.86
9.90
9.88
9.87
9.88
9.91
9.88
9.87
9.89
9.88
9.86
9.90
9.85
9.88
9.92
9.89
9.85
9.85
9.89
9.89
9.89
9.8?
9.84
9.84
9.90
9.92
qq,
9.92
9.88
9.87
9.84
9.89
9.90
9.88
9.85
9.87
9.90
9.89
9.86
50.00
0.88
o.?2
0.80
44.62
48.44
48 53
35.72
34.46
34.96
35.36
35.66
34.25
34.21
34.29
34.27
34.74
34.7 t
35.37
34.23
34.40
34.81
34.36
34.45
34.54
34.46
34.27
34.76
34.68
35.04
35.27
35.37
35.42
34.31
34.73
34.80
34.35
34.33
35.07
34.54
34.15
34.26
34.33
35.00
34.61
35.30
34.30
34.4t
34.t3
34.23
34.59
34.79
35.3 I
34.66
33.71
32.9t
34.59
34.69
34.40
34.19
34.01
34.06
33.94
34.33
34.63
34.'t2
34.35
tuTf c El N i GA L G ** * ***,o*
Sourcer
Projet No:
Dater
Time
Uria
Or-Outlet CO:-Outlet NOr-Oudet
Yo dry Yo dry ppwd
Uncorretcd Ruo Avcregc (Co5)
Cd Gs Corccotrrtion (Cla)
Preidt Systcm Zero Rdponse
P6ttBt Syrtem Zcro RspoNe
Avcrage Zero Reponse (Co)
Prct6t Systcm Cd R6ponse
P6ttqt System Crl Rdponse
Average Cal Reponsc (Cy)
Correted Run
l3: l0
l3:l I
13:12
l3: l3
l3: l4
l3:l 5
l3:16
l3:17
l3: t8
l3:19
13:2O
l3:21
13..22
13:23
13:24
l3:25
13:26
t3'.2'l
l3:28
13:29
l3:30
l3:31
13:32
l3:33
13:34
l3;35
l3:36
t3.37
l3:38
l3:39
l3:40
l3:41
13:42
t3..43
13t44
l3:45
13.46
13:47
l3:48
l3:49
l3:50
l3:51
13:52
l3:53
l3:54
l3:55
l3:56
13..57
l3:58
l3:59
l4:00
l4:01
t4..02
l4:03
l4:04
l4:05
l4:06
l4:07
l4:08
l4:09
3.42
12.oo
0.19
0, l6
0.18
I 1.95
I 1.88
1.92
3.32
9.99
11.85
0.15
0.13
0.14
I 1.85
|.v2
I 1.89
9.94
9.98
10.02
9.99
10.00
9.9
9.98
9.99
10.02
9.98
9.98
10.00
t0.03
10.02
9.99
10.00
9.9'1
10.01
10,01
10.01
9.99
10.03
10.01
9.99
10.0t
9.98
9.98
9.98
10.01
9.96
9.91
9.96
10.02
9.99
9.9
10.00
t0.00
9.96
o01
9.97
10.00
10.01
9.98
9.99
9.98
9.98
9.97
9.96
10.02
10.02
10.04
to.o2
9.99
9.9'l
9.96
9.98
10.01
10.02
10.01
9.94
9.98
34.40
50.00
o.72
0.90
0.81
48.44
48.91
48.68
35.09
34.'16
34.41
34.63
34.42
34.15
34.33
34.55
34.04
34.67
35.86
35.02
33.93
34.39
34.57
34.31
35.40
34.30
34.73
34.04
34.98
34.46
34.82
34.51
35.03
33.64
35.43
35.06
34.5'1
35.05
34.80
34.60
34.70
34.25
34.65
34.25
33.83
33.78
34.'12
34.60
34.O2
34.13
34.'73
34. l6
33.91
34.57
34.40
34.15
34.58
34.37
33.78
34.03
33.62
33.72
34.75
34.75
33.75
33.71
33.64
33.93
32.23
3.41
3.38
3.40
3.42
3.41
3.43
3.43
3.40
3.45
3.45
3.43
3.40
3.41
3.43
3.43
3.46
3.40
3.40
3.40
3.40
3.39
3.41
3.40
3.41
3.43
3.44
3.40
3.39
3.45
3.45
3.44
3.38
3.43
3.42
3.42
3.38
3.48
3.52
3.46
3.38
3.42
3.44
3.44
3.42
3.44
3.U
3.41
3.37
3.37
3.33
3.36
3.42
3.47
3.48
3.44
3.41
3.37
3.39
3.49
3.11
Run3-RMData
QA Data
I=Ci-l!'.i,CAL GROUP
Location Rio Tinto Kennecott - Magna. UT
Source Holman Boiler (SME026)
Project No. 2023-3176
Parameter Or - Outlet Cfl, - Orrflet NOx - Outlet
Make
Model
SAI
Oneretins Ranse
S€ryOMEX
1400
1420-4
0-25
setvomex
14l0
r4l5-c
0-2s
Thermo
42C
67858358
0-100
Cylinder ID
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
NA
880093372
RR03252
NA
NA
880093372
RR03252
NA
NA
E80085549
E80085549
Cylinder Certifed Values
Z.ero
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
NA
t0.76
24
NA
NA
10.98
23.7
NA
NA
179.2
179.2
Cylinder Expiration Date
7*ro
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
NA
7120129
r0/19t29
NA
NA
7120/29
t0lt9l29
NA
NA
nl2U24
nt2U24
Response Times
TECiI\iCAL GROU!'
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - Maena. UT
Source: Holman Boiler (SME026)
Project No.: 2023-3176
Times, seconds
Parameter Or - Outlet COz - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Zero
Low
Mid
Hieh
20
NA
20
20
20
NA
20
20
l5
NA
l5
l5
Averase 20.0 20.0 15.0
Calibration DataTECq\iCAI- $F'IJ=
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - Maena. UT
Source: Holman Boiler (SME026)
Project No.: 2023-3 I 76
Dile: 10/5123
Parameter Or - Outlet CO: - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Exnected Average Concentration 3.s0 r0.00 50.00
Span Between
Low
High
Desired Span
3.50
20.00
24.00
10.00
s0.00
23.70
50.00
2s0.00
100.00
Low Range Gas
Low
Hioh
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Mid Range Gas
Low
Hish
9.60
14.40
9.48
14.22
40.00
60.00
High Range Gas
Low
Hish
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Actual Concentration (7o or ppm)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
0.00
NA
12.00
24.00
0.00
NA
I 1.85
23.70
0.00
NA
50.00
100.00
Resoonse Time (seconds)20.00 20.00 20.00
Upscale Calibration Gas (Clra)Mid Mid Mid
Instrument Response (o/o or ppm)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
-0.01
NA
I 1.99
24.01
0.09
NA
tl.7 5
23.84
0.40
NA
st.79
99.97
Performance (7o of Span or CaI. Gas Conc.)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hieh
0.04
NA
0.04
0.04
0.38
NA
0.42
0.59
0.40
NA
1.79
0.03
Status
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
r tr - -. \: a I I n c n I I 3
Bias/Drift Determin ations
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - Masna. UT
Source: Holman Boiler (SME026)
Project No.: 2023-3176
Parameter Or - Outlet COz - Outlel NOx - Outlet
Run I Date l0l5/23
Span Value
Initial Instrurnenl Zero Cal Response
Initial Instrurnent Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem Uoscale Resnonse
24.0
0.0
12.0
0.2
0.2
l 1.9
I 1.9
23.7
0.1
I 1.8
0.2
0.1
l 1.8
I t.8
100.0
0.4
51.8
1.0
0.9
48. I
48.6
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
hetest Span
Pncffect Sh4n
0.8
1.0
-0.4
-0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.6
0.5
-J. I
-3.2
)rift(%)
l,ero
\4id
0.2
0.0
-0. I
0.1
-0.1
0.5
Run 2 Date l0l5l23
Span Value
Instrument Zero Cal Response
Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem IJnscale Resnonse
24.0
0.0
12.0
0.2
0.2
I 1.9
12.0
23.7
0.1
11.8
0.1
0.2
l 1.8
l1.9
100.0
0.4
5 1.8
0.9
0.7
48.6
48.4
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Span
1.0
0.8
-0.3
-0.2
n)
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.3
-3.2
-3.4
Drift(%)
Zero
Mid
-0.2
0.2
0.0
0.1
-0.2
-0.2
Run 3 Date l0l5/23
Span Value
lnstrument Zero Cal Response
Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem Uoscale Resoonse
24.0
0.0
12.0
0.2
0.2
12.0
I1.9
23.7
0.1
I 1.8
0.2
0.1
11.9
11.9
100.0
0.4
51.8
0.7
0.9
48.4
48.9
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest SDan
0.8
0.7
-0.2
-0.5
0.3
0.2
0.4
0.7
0.3
0.5
-3.4
-2.9
Drift(%)
Zero
Mid
-0. I
-0.3
-0. I
0.3
0.2
05
"5*\:_i--- --
*i=-rrti*I -,E*.'tt
--314.-Accreditation ,162754
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shrevepod, LA 71107
800-551 -81 50
PGVP Vendor lD # G12021
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:
Product lO Number:
Cylinder Pressure:
coA #
Customer PO. NO.:
Customer:
RR03252
127907
1900 PSIG
<RO3?57 70211012-t)
Certification Date:
Expiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Certifi cation Dates:
10tz'v2021
10t19t2029
-ShreveDori-IA
RR03252.?O211012
'l o:1923415
This calibration standard per the May 20'12 EPA Traceability Protocol, Document EPA-600/R-12/531,
inq procedure G2.
I
Certified
Concentration Uncertainty
LO 18 "/,
r0.13 %
Analytical Principle Assayed On
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
23.7 %
24.0 Yo
NDIR
MPA
1012'U2021
1At2012021
Nitrogen Balance
Analytical Measurement
SMART.CERT
cc727782.20201022
E80039'1 49.201 9061 0
E80078072.201 80504
E8O100923 20201022
20.03 0/"
24.75 0/"
24 o/o
19.47 0/"
SRl,r 2659a
ct579010.02
071001
c1847810.03
1'162980025 11t01t2021
1 162980025 10t19t2021
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifications. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National lnstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lnternational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specifled or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confidence level of the measurement, unless otherwise noted. This calibration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Services. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
Briftany Johnson
Analytical chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Version 02-J, Revised on 20'18-09-17
-ce}!.ffi Red H Tectu{r=d Gee SerrteSetsrmtnrr
$ilf,Dolt'tA ml$,
tE6El{re
PrSr?ktrBtel2ttt
EPA PROTOGOL GAS GERTIFICATE OF AilALYSIS
qEtE:
Froid.DtE:qkPn crrr
eo^*
GsEPo.l0.:
ffi
ruqfiflia
tiEE,Il
lgEPIE
FnorErrrrylffi3o
GE&f
ffiCTE3re@
LotftrTracESlt*:
PnnbO;ff-r:
F Enf,m.ljffin.
Gl-
Th fr
Ger&d
)qod Mr l,h6.d-qr ratHlrlbEnl.kgede
ffin IXq*le
Oggtgl
10.76%
{0s8I
l{Lost6
l{trE9&
lEm,
tPA
wnswl
grfrDEt(I,I
lt[ogen Be
o.cHue3 GG r? @
a@EM GG *' @
trEllEEi d7ry1
tW wl
S'TRT€ERT
IIit bboE f'tC ga!€s'!*[rd h* bcffi'Ests4 edlrffi lo rEAECf:d.p.ffml niE#1JFc Ac,ffi uitEGis3.ra* traEac ffiellrafgh f6sd ffiEof S-grbrd
Tc.$no5ryolsf! tsIE Brrtrt a SI&'Bolf.rc (s,. Tr re<+<f ompfane# ba rytslt.aIEr{Ea6rlrrltentfeE.3E&rF&darEqiedffi*b#tg F G. nE€Fae rrEHdb use a 6crAEW ofEzn ryt*pE E Sf grfu H aa fu rnsre*E t mts36 otlerrire rEGd- Tlts cffim stFr*
#sonUDtr Enrffied zdCr* tlateEpt# o[s{lnr h tl,rilErtrBrapod frrn Rd BdTeffi Ge Senira f didrled.tE.noeltirydc&dolsae adder+s! EqEanat rreEtrn itffir*.
*sr6*fi*ir$rss8otsil vi*t@E"t Mcr2tlSs&l?
Part Number:
Cylinder Number:
Laboratory:
PGVP Number:
Gas Code:
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Grade of Product: EPA Protocol
E02N199E15A0076
EB0085549
124 - Tooele (SAP)- UT
872016
NO,NOX,BALN
Expiration Date:
Reference Number:
Cylinder Volume:
Cylinder Pressure:
Valve Outlet:
Certification Date:
Nov 21,2024
153-124587928-2
144.4 CF
2015 PSIG
660
Nov21,2016
Certification performed in accordance with "EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards (May 2012)" document EPA
600/R-1 2/531 , using the assay procedures listed. Analytical Methodology does not require correction for analytical interference. This cylinder has a total analytical
uncertainty as stated below with a confidence level of 95%. There are no significant impurities which affect the use of this calibration mixture. All concentrations are on a
Triad Data Available Upon Request
Sionature on file
mole/mole basis unless otheMise noted.
Do Not Use This below 10o t.e
Component Requested
Concentration
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Actua! Protocol Total Relative Assay
DatesConcentrationMethod Uncertainty
NOX
NITRIC OXIDE
NITROGEN
180.0 PPM
1BO.O PPM
Balance
179.2 PPM
't79.1 PPM
G1 +l- 1.2o/o NIST Traceable
+l- 1.2o/o NIST Traceable
1 1 I 1 4t201 6, 1',! 121 t2016
1 1 11412016. 1 1 121 t2016G1
CALIBRATION STANDARDS
Type Lot lD Cylinder No Concentration Uncertainty Expiration Date
NTRM 15060323
PRM 12367
GM|S 0315201603
cc448273 241.0 PPM NITRIC OXIDE/NITROGEN 0.5
1.60/o
1.6
Mar 30, 2021
May 29, 2016
Ma||5,2019
APEX1099237 9.B2PPMNITROGENDIOXIDE/NITROGEN
cc502257 4.875 PPM NITROGEN DIOXIDE/NITROGEN
The SRM, PRM or RGM noted above is only in reference to the GMIS used in the assay and not part of the analysis.
InstrumenUMake/Model
ANALYTICAL BQUIPMENT
Analytical Principle Last Multipoint Calibration
Nicolet 6700 AHR0801550 NO MNO
Nicolet 6700 AHR0801550 NO2 impurity
FTIR
FTIR NO2 impuritv
Nov 03, 2016
Nov 04, 2016
Approved for Release Page'l of 1 53-124587928-2
tuTfGTINICAL GROUP
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott -
Project No.: 2023.3176
NO2 Converter Check - Outlet
Analyzer Make Thermo
Analyzer Model 42C
Serial Number 67858358
Cylinder ID Number EB005833,
Cylinder Exp. Date llllS/24
Cvlinder Concentration. DDm 48.8
Pre-Test Date : Time
Pre-Test Concentrationr ppm
Pre-Test Efficiencv. 7o
Post-Test Date 10/5123 Time
Post-Test Concentrationr ppm
Post-Test Efficiencv. 7o
l4:44
43.88
90
*Required Efficiency is > 90 %.
"{ -.'- / '};;::ij-:
-?J,t-[,
--i-!
Accreditation ,162754
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71107
800-551 -81 50
PGVP Vendor lD #G1202'l
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:
Product lD Number:
Cylinder Pressure:
coA#
Gustomer PO. NO.:
Customer:
:80058339
130113
1550 PSIG
t80058339.2021 0922-0
Certification oate:
Expiration Oate:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Gertification Dates:
11t1912021
1111812024
- Shreveoort - LA
:80058339.2021 0922
)74330814
SMART-CERT
has been certified per the May 2012 EPA Traceability 1
usino orocedure G2
I Do Not Use This Cylinder Below 100 psig (0.7 Megapascal). I
Analytical Measurement Data Available Online.
Reference Standard(s)
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined speciflcations. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National lnstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lnternational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specifled or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confldence level of the measurement, unless otheMise noted. This calibration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Services. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
/ g---./ -.. ;'i-z---5+----'"
Brandon Theus
Laboratory Supervisor
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Version 02-J. Revised on 2018-09-17
Certif ied Goncentration(s)
Goncentration Uncertainty Analwcal Principle Assayed On
Nitrogen Dioxide 48.8 PPM *0.5 PPM FTIR 10t1512021 , 11t05t2021 , 1111912021
5.02%t0.04 o/o MPA 10t04t2421
Balance
E80069863.201 91 01 7
E80078072.201 80504
E800832 17.20161 20'l
E80085260.201 901 02
E80100438.20'190102
410i
MKS 2O3lDJG2EKVS13T
MKS 2031 DJG2EKVSl 3T
MKS 2031 DJG2EKVSl 3T
1162980025 1010112021
017146467 0911712021
017146467 1012212021
017146467 11t1912021
tu
l:C{r'1 CAr.- CEC-r :
EPA Method 205
Field Calibration of Dilution System
Localion: Rio Tinto Kennecott - l\{&na- IIT
D*e 9/27123
vlethod Criteria EPA
'arameter o2
Makr
Model
s,ti
c^--
Servomex
4900
100269
)40
lvlinder Number ID
Zero
Mid
Ii^L
NA
EB0069887
lvlinder Certified Values
Zero
Mid
qi-L
0.0
10.96
Instrum€nl Resoonse (7o or oom)
7rcro
Mid
0.0
I 1.0
240
lelihrrtion Grs Saleclinn (o/. nfSnrn)
Mid
Hidh
45.7
100 0
lelihretion Errnr Performance loln ofSnnnl
Zero
Mid
Hidh
0.0
0.0
01
v (o/" ofRanoel
-0.1
Analyzer Make: Seruomex
Analvzer Model: 4900
Analyzer SN
Environics [D: 8412
Component/Balece Gas
Cylinder Gas ID (Dilution): CC716358
Cl linder Gr Concenlration (Dilution). %: 24
Cylinder Gm ID (Mid-l*vel): EB0069887
Cylinder Gas Concentration (Mrd-Lf,vel). %: 10.96
Target Illass Flow
(,-onlrolleK
Target
Dilution Target Flow Rat,
Targct
Concentratioil
Actual
Concentration
Injection I
Analyzer
Conc€ntration
Injection 2
Analyzer
Conc€ntration
Injection 3
Analyzer
Concentration
Average
Analyzer
Concentration Difference
Average
Error
( + 2./.\
toL/5I 800 50 92 lg 3 t9 3 t93 t93 l9 3t o02 o to/^
IOU5L 50.0 5.0 20 2.0 )o )o )o )o)o02 o )o/"
IOL/IL 20.0 4.0 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.'77 .0.03 "0.'tyo
lol-i lL 10.0 4.0 4 2.4 2.4 2.4 4 2.40 0.00 o.0%
+Notafl ASTEnvirooicsUnitshave2-l0LMassFlowControllers. Fortheseunitslhe9OYo@7lpmard80%@Tlpnrinjectionswill notbeconduct€d.
Ayerage
Analyzer
Concetrtration
lo/^\
Injection I
Error
( r 2./.1
Injection 2
Error
(+2%\
Injection 3
Error
( + 2./.\
19.31 -o t%o.u/o O.lYo
l2 02 o oo/"o lo/.o oo/"
477 o to/"-o to/"o to/"
2.40 o oo/"-o 40/"o 40/"
Mid-Level
Calibration
Gas
Concentration
Injection I
Analyzer
Concentration
Injection 2
Analyzer
Concentration
lnjection 3
Analyzer
Concentration
Average
Analyzer
Concentration Difference
Av€rag€
Error
(+2o/.\
t095 il0 il0 lt 0 ll00 o04 o 4r/r
S{r34i liESllEg
Mass Flovu Controller Calibraton
Document lD 520.m9
Revisior 22.0
Effective Dat(12/16t22
lssuing Department Iech Seryices Pao(1of1
Dilution Slntem Make:
Dilution Systsm Model:
Dilution S)rstem S/N:
Calibrafi on Equiprnent Make:
Callbratbn Equipment Model:
Calibratbn Equiprnent S/N:
Flow Cell S/N:
Flow Cell S/N:
Calibraton Gas:
Barornetlc Pressurc, mmHg:
Amblent Temperaure, "F:
Environics
4040
8412
Alicat Scientific
M-10SLPD/sMM-D/5tV, t'/4-1SLPM-D/5M
206/208
127208
127206
Nitrogen
25.48
65.5
Mass Flow Contolbr lD
Size, ccm:
Make:
Model:
S/N:
#'l
i0,000
Environics
ttc 202
0626687006
#2
10,000
Environics
Etc 202
0626687003
#3
1,000
Environics
EFC 202
0626685003
SetFlow TrueFlow Diftrene
cdmin cclmln
Set Flow True Flow Difference
cdmin cdmin
Set Flow True Flow Diftrence
cclmin cdmin
50k
10o/o
20o/o
30%
40%
50%
6tr/o
70%
\trA
90%
100%
500 504 0.8%
1,000 1,024 24!o
2,000 2,067 3.4%
3,000 3,095 3.270
4,000 4,114 2.90/0
s,000 5,130 2.6%
6,000 6,147 2.5!o
7,000 7,159 2.30/o
8,000 8,175 2 2Vo
9,000 9,184 2.0%
10,000 10,202 2.00/o
500 508 1.60/0
1,000 1,030 3.00/0
2,000 2,069 3.50/0
3,000 3,1M 3.50k
4,000 4,142 3.60k
5,000 5,159 3.2%
6,000 6,173 2.9%
7,000 7,188 2.7%
8,000 8,194 2.4%
9,000 9,190 2.1%
10,000 10,198 2.Oo/o
50 49 1.2%
100 100 0A%
200 201 0.2%
300 302 0.5%
400 403 0.8%
500 504 0.8%
600 605 0.8%
700 707 1.00/0
800 810 1.2Yo
900 914 1.60/0
1,000 1,020 2.0vo
Note: The mass flow controller's calibration values are used by the dilution system's operating software to improve accuracy. These calibrations are not necessarily
indicative of the systems overall performance. Performance is verified by conducting a Method 205 prior to each field use.
Calibration Performed By: TCH
Date: 4/25/2023
HBITcffiGtSerrirs6cEt(rretfkr
Sbrgoil,LA TftE&4n$ts
P'ffiVtr&l}*elz@l
EPA PROT(rcOL GAS CERNFIGATE OF AilALYSIS
ffiP=rrMDE:.qrerPlrcr:
ooAi;ffiFtGlll:
ffi
GliEf
E4ift tEErEE ryLofrGTrarfigf*r
MECEqoiD.Ei
Gffi& tIE rtrEr adHlitEFc Ed(r
3ffi F hbd,DcrrttEP*ffiR-!ffi,1,
sAarffir
@,A,IU@@. O*EIE' GI*E teql{F*sf,ctr, -_o!g!ul' .. F."s___- te___._,-
E@ITEJDiSG aflETUC G$6 !E
Tlls ir bcerq E gaie3 *Erc.t ke bcEl G&&OH4 fl5 cro b rrE t IIis
G*rffi E rerhed Enrg Caigi 6Sc*E fiatacfGUe llEgtr llaEd redsErlilbrld
Tedtroaq/0lsr, E & trttrElffil Wn of t rG €S- IhEie d@Ecr stsE aa sl?ais dlc
tE *fid r eqned .a8t{rdoctre#{rg foes T}u cryer# r,rrldEJcs Ge a crrqe
W cf HzbryoirE& gfrf s&ebrdoalicrExreflEn(. lnk3so6sri* r*d, Tlisffii #
a?gts oryb tu ilG dr.gful d rH nd te lt8ro.lrtt &r&ar h t{ dEturEen ryrd tur H H
T€rtraEd Gas ScrriE" lrdid&l tccaoettirydc&&oi* a,# rFan rEqle3ttd*te t*eil hSGrlf
*xrd*m**ryFerscfd-
lffiq.riqEr,*t,lr
Asryt#rffif REdSdTGS
leftk€q{ kt@z$lG@fa
: * \:*jr',- ,:ffi*
_a r'.n \1j'r:?JIT
edf,
Accreditation #52754
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 7'1107
800-551 -81 50
PGVP Vendor lD # G12020
EPA PROTOGOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:
Product lD Number:
Cylinder Pressure:
coA#
Customer PO. NO,:
Customer:
1c716358
127907
1900 PS|G
1c716358.2020081 0-0
Certification oate:
Expiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Certification Dates:
)811812020
18t16t2028
- Shreveport - LA
:c716358 20200810
098496541
standard per the May 201 2 EPA Traceability Protocol, Document -1 1.
using procedure G1.
Certif ied Concentration(s)
Concentration Uncertainty
ilolB"
r0.12%
Analytical Principle Assayed On
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
23.7 %
24.0 Yo
NDIR
MPA
08t17t2020
08t18t2020
Nitrogen Balance
Analytical Measurement Data Available online.
SMART-CERT
07100'1
2659a
c'1309410.01
1'162980025 0AtO3t2020
t'162980025 0712312020
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifications. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National lnstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lnternational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confidence level of the measurement, unless otherwise noted. This calibration c€rtificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Services. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
fu*,:kL
Jasmine Godfrey
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Version 02-J, Revised on 2018-09-17
tuTE C*{N'CAL GFtOt}?
QA Data
Location Rio Tinto Kennecott - Maqnr, UT
Source Holmrn Boiler (SME026)
Project No. 2023-3176
Parameter(s) VFR
Date Pitot ID Evidence of
damasc?
Evidence of
mis-alisnment?
Calibration or
Reneir reouired?
10t5t23 P- I 208 no no no
Dete Probe or
Thermocnnnle ID
Reference
Tahn /on\
Indicated
Temn IoF\Differente Criterir
t0tst23 P- I 208 350.0 350.0 0.0%+ 1.5 % (absolute)
Field Balance Check
Date r0t04t23
Balance ID:scale-23
Certified Weight ID:SLC-4
Certified Weight (g):1000.0
Measured Weight (g):1000.0
Weight Difference (g):0.0
Date Barometric Pressurr Evidence of
t^-^^^t Reading Verilied Calibration or
Renqir rcnrrired?Weather Strtion Location
t0l5l23 Weather Station NA NA NA Salt lake City, UT
Date Meter Box ID Positive Pressure Leak Check
t0l5l23 m5-30 Pass
DGM Calibration-Orifices
Document I 620.044
Revlsior
Eff-".tive Dat(12/16/22
lssuing Department Tech Seryices Paq(l of 1
Equipment Detail - Dry Gas Meter
Console lD: M5-30
Meter S/N: M5-30
Critical Orifice S/N: 1330
Calibration Detail
Initial Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (Pb,)
Final Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (PbF)
Averaoe Barometric Pressure, in. Hq (Pb)
25.75
25.79
25.77
Critifcal Orifice lD (Y)
K' Factor, ft3.R'/2 / in. wc.min (K)
Vacuum Pressure, in. Hg (Vp)
lnitial DGM Volume, ftr (Vmr)
Final DGM Volume, ftr (Vmr)
Total DGM Volume. ftr (vm)
1330-31
0.8429
13.0
423.200
438.910
15.110
1330-31 1330,25
0.6728
15.0
478.440
489.350
10 910
1330-25 1330-19
0.5186
17.0
512.800
522.710
9.910
1330-19
0.8429 0.613 0.519
13.0
438.910
454.625
15 715
15.0
489.350
500.160
10.810
17.0
522.710
532.475
9.765
Ambient Temperature, 'F (Ta)
Initial DGM Temperature, 'F (Tm )
Final DGM Temperature,'F (TmF)
Averaoe DGN,1 Temperature, 'F ( Tm)
66
72
74
73
66
74
74
74
66
75
75
7\
66
75
75
75
66
74
73
74
66
73
73
73
Elapsed Time (O)
Meter Orifice Pressure, in. WC (AH)
Standard Meter volume, ftr (Vmstd)
Standard Critical Orifice Volume, ftr (Vcr)
lveter Correction Factor (Y)
Tolerance
Orifice Calibration Value (AH @)
Tolerance
Orifice Cal Check
15.00
3.10
13.5251
14.2107
"1.05'l
0.001
I6t3
0.012
'15.00
3.10
'13.5040
14.2107
1.052
0.003
1.669
0.015
13.00
2.00
9.3284
9.8306
1.054
0.004
1.682
0.002
13.00
2.00
9.2429
9.8306
1.064
0.014
1.682
0.002
15.00
1.20
8.4779
8.7433
"1.031
0.018
1 700
0.015
15.00
1.20
8.36.17
8.7433
1.046
0.004
1.701
0.017
1.26 1.95 1.91
Meter Correction Factor 01 1.050
3rifice Calibration Value (AH @)1.585
Positive Pressure Leak Check Yes
Equipment Detail - Thermocouple Sensor
Reference Calibrator Make: Omega
Reference Calibrator Model: CL23A
Reference Calibrator S/N: T-197207
Calibration Detail
Reference Temp Disolav Temo Accuracv Difference
oF .R OF .R oF
0
68
100
460
528
560
2
oo
100
462
528
560
-0.4
0.0
0.0
2
0
0
223
248
273
683
708
t 11
225
250
a1t
685
710
735
0.3
0.3
0.3
2
2
2
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
1,100
1,200
760
860
960
1,060
1,160
1,260
1,360
1,460
1,560
1,660
303
401
501
601
703
801
903
1,003
1,101
1,204
763
861
961
1,061
1,163
1,261
1,361
1,463
1,561
1,664
-0.4
-0.'1
-0.'1
-0.1
-0.3
-0.1
-0.2
-0.2
-0"r
-0.2
3
1
1
1
3
1
3
3
1
4
Personnel
Calibration By,
Calibration DaIe. 5 /12/2023
tuTECH\}CAL GFIOUP
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - Maena. UT
Source: Holman Boiler (SME026)
Project No.: 2023-3176
D*e: 101512023
Traverse Point Time o2
(o/"1
CO,
(o/"\
NOx
(nnm)
A-l
2
J
4
5
6
l0:00
l0:01
l0:02
l0:03
l0:04
l0:05
3.57
3.s4
3.53
3.52
3.52
3.61
9.41
9.45
9.46
9.46
9.47
9.43
43.01
42.55
41.77
42.62
41.98
41.93
Averaee 3.5 9.4 42.3
Criteria Met Sinsle Point Sinele Point Sinsle Point
rnNC)N,.
r
iot-o-oo(Jo
C)E
o
o
o
oo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
I
I9

P9
9
9
9
9
e
9
9
9
9
o
to

o
lr
)
o
l
o
o
r
o
o
l
r
)
o
t
(
)
o
l
r
)
O
O
F
FN
N
c
.
)
(
o
\
t
$
t
r
)
t
J
)
O
O
o
o
o
66
6
6
c
t
c
t
o
o
d
:
J
co

(o

(f
)

c.
r
c
o
(
'
)
(
f
)
(
.
)
(
9
(
r
)
(
f
)
(
f
)
(
f
)
c
Q
NN
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
tt
t
t
t
t
t
l
t
l
l
l
l
l
oo
o
o
(
)
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
oo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
tt
t
t
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
lo

tr
)

ro

lr
r
l
r
)
t
r
)
l
r
)
l
o
l
o
l
o
r
o
l
o
l
o
t
o
oo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
xozoc
i
r
o.
\
t
Fo
vc
lHd
Oo
)
-.
.
c
l
U9
L(
i
.g
o
cL

.,
tr
oOa
!
oo
I'6olEE6I
oooE(UL(E
ILLo'6co(UEoI
O,

@
(f
)

Nt
t
l
O
(
r
)
t
N
O
)
*
t
F
O
(
o
(r
)

(O

F-

(f
)
I
r
)
O
)
(
O
F
(
O
(
o
O
r
$
*
t
(
o
o)

o
o
ol
)
c
Q
-
c
o
F
-
t
-
N
F
*
t
F
@
!
N@
N
S
@
-
C
O
O
O
c
r
T
O
)
O
)
F
-
-
5
r.
-

I-
-

rr
)

oo
N
@
o
-
o
$
o
)
a
r
s
5
lO

(f
)

O
O)

f'
-
(
o
l
'
-
(
O
-
@
@
F
-
(
O
r
O
P
$
s
$
ca
c
o
(
f
)
(
o
(
f
)
(
r
)
c
\
t
N
N
N
N
@
-
tO

@N
t
O
O
)
N
(
o
O
r
c
O
(
O
O
C
O
f.
-

N
(O

Ot
.
c
)
o
)
C
D
O
N
(
c
)
-
t
O
O
S
lf
)

O
rl
t

O)
(
O
F
.
-
N
(
O
-
I
f
)
O
\
t
O
T
c
.
)
\o

N
@
(f
)

@S
O
)
l
r
)
O
@
-
F
-
N
F
-
(
9
('
)

(f
)

rl
f

ri
f

rO
u
)
(
O
F
-
I
.
-
@
O
O
r
O
)
O
'
ri

ri

ri

ri
d
d
d
d
r
i
r
t
d
d
d
d
o
o
@
oo
@
c
o
o
@
@
@
@
@
@
':
'
(
o

t
tr
)

@s
r
o
o
(
f
)
(
f
)
o
)
(
o
N
(
o
l
r
)
j|
f
J

-
O)

F-
(
'
)
t
f
,
r
c
D
O
r
O
-
@
F
O
^
N
(O

(O

(O

CD
@
l
f
r
c
O
O
@
N
l
O
(
f
)
O
'
;\

o)

F-

s
o-
(
9
(
o
$
@
o
)
@
@
F
F
,n

a
u?

qa
u
?
a
u
?
n
.
q
n
q
q
q
.
N
N
C!

NN
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
(O

O)

(f
)
O
o
)
@
O
(
o
O
)
O
]
f
)
l
r
)
(
O
(o

|r
)

O)

@$
N
o
(
O
-
\
f
$
c
D
o
@
-
@
(f
)

-N
@
F
-
(
f
)
u
)
(
O
l
-
-
\
t
F
t
r
)
(9

F
O,

Ir
)
S
V
O
(
r
)
O
@
*
t
r
(
r
)
O
)
q
a
\.
:
q
o
?
\
a
q
a
q
u
?
\
q
oN
@
o
o
o
o
)
o
)
o,

o,

o,

or
o
)
o
)
o
r
o
r
o
N
c
!
N
F
F
$
$
$
ss
t
$
s
r
f
)
l
o
t
r
)
l
r
)
l
o
r
o
NN
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
C
\
I
N
=
N
fl
o
r
s
<
o
u
:
t
t
$
.
r
:
$
(
o
N
>.

x;
^

i'
o
r
N
o
)
o
r
o
s
l
f
)
(
f
)
s
@
:
-6

X
U
0i
l
$
3
R
F
g
P
3
6
N
J-

'|
:

s4

\.

!.
o
@
o
l
r
r
o
)
r
o
(
o
@
N
c
.
,
D'

S
!e

P
sc
"
i
6
i
o
i
d
-
d
;

ct
o
N
d
-o

ii

H
E
is
+
E
8
3
b
5
3
5
3
x
x
)-

xo
r
c
o
o
r
@
$
N
N
N
-
o
=
=
=
=o
r
o
o
r
o
r
o
,
o
)
o
r
o
)
o
)
o
,
boCFtnoFo(Jc.go-Eo(JL(uCoE.
L)VFE.
rnNoNrr
ioo-oo{-
,
Io
NtrE
oo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
oo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
N
c.
.
i

N
c.
i

F-

c.
i

r-

c.
i

F-

c.
i

N
cr
i

F-

c.
i
aY
?
Y
?
9
I
:
:
f
l
i
l
C
?
g
?
S
S
Y
?
r-
F
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
(f
,

(o

cD

(f
)

(f
)

c.
)

(f
)

co

(f
)

(f
)

(f
,

(o

(f
)

(f
)
NN
(
\
.
I
N
N
(
\
I
N
N
N
C
!
(
\
I
N
N
(
\
t
tt
t
t
(J
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
oo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
tl
t
t
t
r
r
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
ro

ro

rf
)

lt
r
)

lr
)

ro

lo

lo

to

ro

ro

lo

tl
)

lo
(f
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
I(\
{\
'
lI
l
t:
)
(9NoNdoltoooo(!o
xozIoo.lo(EU'
tr
oLooEgo(Loo)
loooo'6clC(UEoI
t
-
(O

-
s
(O

@
O)

lf
,

r
-
I:

-
O)
!
N
xo
o
o
)
o
(
o
t

or
l
-

$o
r
c
.
r
-
+
OY
r
t
f
r
.
t
@
r
O
r
N
$
(
f
r
(
Y
)
N
(
O
i
C)
u
t
-
(
O
r
O
-
N
r
O
N
(
O
(
f
)
O
I
r
)
h
F*

=@
l
O
L
O
O
r
(
O
(
O
r
l
f
)
-
N

N.
r
f
=
@\
.
s
$
$
o
)
t
N
@
N
(
f
)
N
o
)
t
o
=
c.
i

i.
l

c.
i

c.
i

c.
i

d
+
d
o
ri

c.
i

ot
o
,

-
rr
r
r
r
F
-
-
r
t.
*
.f

N
(O

rO

$
N
r
a
O)

€
l*

(O

S
(f
,

N
a'
i

I-

o)

r
(f
)

rr
,

l.
-

x
o
N
$
@
@
o
N
-'
:

O
('
)

ol
)

$
ot
)

t
X
rO

cl

tr
)

O
rO

r
(O
r,

@
N
ro

o)

N
(o

xi

(o

l-

o
!t

F-

r
.t
.^

-
(O

-
tO

Ot

.(
f

@
l-
\

l-

r
(O

O
$
O)

(f
)
d\

(t
,

O
lI
)

ol
,

CO

@
N,
-

r
(O

O
lO

O)

CO

@
(-

o,

t
o)

ro

o
@
;^

l-

N
@
(f
,

@
$
o,
:i

t
lo

ro

(o

i-

N
q{

@
o,

o)

o
o
r
F
''
'
<
i
@
d
t
o
t
o
<
o
9
<
o
@
c
t
N
N
N
N
.,
.

o
@
@
co

@
@
*
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
i:
.
fo-c(oo(I
)
l(o(,6
6oFEq
UJ

o)u)
co
^.

-
(v
)

tf
)

O
tO

-
(r
l

@
-
N
N
lO

$
r.

\
t:

(r
)

F
(\
I

(Y
)

:^

O
Cl

-
.s
f

(f
,

O,

At
i.
.

)(

\f

@
ol
)

rO

0o

}{

(c
)

O)

(f
)

rr
)

N
O)

(f
)
E
.,
,

><

F-

N
lr
)

-
(f
)

Y,
(

O)

O,

O.
t
f

-
t
O
+
;i
'
'
1

N
O
(o

-
(o

*i

$
(O

$
(o

O,

O
1o
Q'

-.

Q
N
+
d
c.
,

d
:P
c
.
i

ot

d
d
cd

oi

F*
="
'

d6
S
S
S
S
X
S
B
E
P
R
N
E
-i

=
o
@
o
@
r-

:x

$
t-

o
o,

(o

@
N
*@
6
@
@
@
w
@
@
O
r
@
@
@
@
@o
@
l
-
@
c
.
)
@
*
*
O
)
@
t
O
)
(
O
',

(f
)

C\
j

O,

rr
)

O.
s
f

-
]
t
l-

(\
l

(f
)

(o

rC
.
$
N
O)

O)

cO

.\
f

F.
-

=
r
N
O)

rt

t
@
1.

@
N
-
N.
<
f

|r
)

O;
.
,

r
@
lO

O,

O)

(r
)
.^

!
(.
)

O
N
N
6
(O

O
>x

O)

O)

O
Or

-
O
}\

('
-

-
lf
l

O)

N
O
@
l-

:r

N
O
r
@
l-
.

N
.
r.
(
D

O
O
o.
)

rO

N
(o

=
r
l-

rO

-
-
Ol
o(
f
)
N
N
0
0
@
r
r
,
x
(
o
@
o
r
o
r
o
r
@
.-
.

lo

\f

$
lr
t

ro

!t

$'
i

ro

s
$
$
s
$
"'

cr
i

c.
i

c.
i

oi

e.
i

c.
i

c.
i

N
c.
i
c
r
i

c.
i

c.
i

c.
i

c.
i
@
-
$
r
tO

N
r
O)

(O

-
O)

O,

O)

F-
tO

-
Ol

@
O)

O
tO

O)

O
O
O)

@
O)

(f
)
*
$
co

o
lr
)

co

ro

(\
l

o
o,

o)

@
$
(f
)
@
(f
)

(O

lf
)

(O

N
t-

@
O)

F-

(O

cD

rO

@
N(
r
)
-
l
"
-
(
f
)
N
r
t
(
o
S
(
o
@
o
.
,
$
(
o
tf
)

l-

O
l'
-

(f
)

@
O
(A

CO

CO

N
(O

@
@
oi

ci

c,

oi

ci

of

ci

o
o
oi

d
of

d
ci
rN
N
r
N
r
C
\
l
N
N
-
N
r
N
N
ro

l{
)

lo

lj
)

u.
,

rI
)

ro

lo

ro

ro

ro

l(
)

ro

lf
)
NN
N
N
N
N
c
\
I
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
uoC.=tho1-o(JC.gE.EoUt-oCod.
LJ
\Zd.
==o(rlrozIa=o
I"
L

F
o:
FJZdEd
ir

l-
tf
i
uJ
=
oz

i
-o
d=

|
F>
)Z
ul
(r
'
)NoNrnoL(u
-ooP()o
cttr
tr
a,o)oEoo(L
ioG)
ttooo'ococ(5EEI
oo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
99
9
9
9
9
9
C
9
q
2
9
9
9
9
ol
r
)
o
l
o
o
t
o
o
r
o
o
|
r
)
o
r
o
o
L
r
)
::
:
f
l
f
l
c
?
q
?
:
f
:
q
9
9
9
9
r
:
co

(f
)

co

(f
)

(o

cY
)

(o

(o

(o

(f
)
.
t

$
$
$
--
r
r
r
(f
)
c
f
)
(
f
)
(
f
)
(
f
)
c
)
(
f
r
(
e
(
f
r
(
o
(
f
)
o
(
o
(
o
NN
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
tt
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
oo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
oo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
rt
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
r
t
ro
l
o
l
o
r
o
l
o
r
o
l
o
r
o
l
'
r
)
l
f
)
|
f
)
l
r
)
l
r
)
t
r
)
oo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
ei
,No(\
tdo.c
tooo6,Go
xozooFso(!o6)(,c.qCL
tr
ro

cY
)

to

o)

@
$
cf
,

v
o)

@
*
@
(o

-
=
co

tr
)
N

ro
s

oo
N

F
(o
^
\
,

(r
)

$
cr
)
+
sr
i
f

l.
r
)
O
)
N
(
r
)
(
O
r
N
(
f
)
-
O
)
F
-
N
i
(f
)
o
r
t
r
)
(
f
r
!
t

-
r
o)
(
o
c
o
x
$

$
o)
i^

(O
l
.
c
)

+
F-

-
(O

$
N(
O
t
O
)
<
O
(
O
O
)
=
NO
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Y
O
O
O
)
=
c.
i
d
d
d
d
c
;
d
d
d
o
9
o
c
t
o
i
2
NS
$
S
S
$
$
$
r
i
f
$
:
S
!
t
(
f
)
rr
r
f,o-croOJ
^O
)
@
F
-
@
$
(
v
)
N
r
,
n
O
r
@
xi
o
N
t
(
o
6
0
N
$
x
F
.
-
N
"@
c
Q
@
c
o
@
s
o
s
x
i
s
a
o
:^

\t

CO

r
lr
)

6
C\
l

tr
)

O,

l'
:

(O

O
Y
l-

-
(o

O
$
O)

(f
)

l'
-

lJ

(O

d)

o
o
ds
S
h
s
E
R
p
R
*
3
8
-
-
''
l

.\
l

tO

rO

(o

(o

l*

l-

@
*{

or
)

or
)
>r
-
N
r
-
r
-
N
r
-
F
-
t
-
L
N
F
-
w@
c
o
@
o
c
o
o
c
o
o
*
6
o
6
ri
l

^,

@
$
rO

F-

O,

N
(O

N
S
^,

c.
)
.
F
6
^N

6)

O)

(\
t

f.
-

r
(f
)

d)

r
O)

:r

O
(f
)

o
e'

t
(o

cf
)

(9

co

N
N
co

co

r-

s
:
N6
:
r
F
-
$
s
O
r
-
L
O
l
-
(
O
O
X
$
+
@(
o

\.
(
o
(
o

oo
r
(
o
-
(
o
o
)
(
o
v
1
€
)
.4
-

oi

d
99

oi

-
cd

c.
i

ci

ci
o
t

+
N
\
J
-c
l

Nr
]
)
Y
(
f
)

F-

(O
o
r
)

t-

t-
O
F
-
O
I
r
-
t
i-
i

tO

F-

(O

N
O)

(O

(O

(f
)

O
i
S
o,

o)

Y<

O
O)

l-

(O

co

(o

(o

O)

O)

=
F-
66
w
O
)
C
O
O
6
6
@
@
C
O
6
w
6
lr
)

t-

N
@
t(
)

(o

O)

N
@
ti
f

-
(O

1'
-

r
Oc
.
)
(
r
)
O
)
.
\
f
N
6
O
$
N
l
^
r
N
-
$O
(
O
N
$
F
-
O
)
N
r
(
)
(
o
=
N
O
r
r
)
to
r
O
@
-
C
O
(
O
l
r
)
t
l
r
)
N
:
@
O
O
)
^
rO
)
6
c
.
)
(
O
O
)
O
.
+
O
@
l
i
-

(O

tO
d<

O
N
cD

r.
-

@
l.
-

cO

tf
)

\t

N
X
@
Ol

-
o)
@
N
o
(
f
)
(
f
)
r
o
c
o
N
o
r
x
1
r
)
N
F
-
N(
O
(
O
N
F
F
-
@
O
)
N
O
T
H
(
o
N
(
o
-q
q
a
u
?
'
f
|
a
a
$
t
o
$
-
1

sr
o
r
o
c\
j

c\
r

c\
r

c\
r

c\
r

6r

N
c\
i

c\
i

6i

N
6i

c\
i

c\
i
r
N
f'
-

CY
)

(9

CD

CO

(f
)

C.
)

-
O)

N
*
tf
)
F-
O
O
)
(
Y
)
@
@
N
(
o
*
t
'
O
l
-
-
,
X
r
l'
-

(O

F
N
lr
)

(O

6
-
@
l,

6
(o

Xi

@
(f
)

(O

O)

$
N
-
F-

O)

ro

)^

N
rt

:i

S
O)
N
.
s
t
O
)
N
(
O
N
(
v
)
N
X
o
O
l
r
r
,
X
s
tq

u?

c?

q
q
t
q
o,
{

q
Y
N
(o

-1

(o
o)
o
o
o
o
r
o
o
o
o
)
=
o
r
o
t
=
o
,
FN
N
N
T
N
N
N
T
i
A
T
-
)
^
r
1r
)

1r
)

to

lo

1o

ro

l.
o

lr
)

rf
,

xi

to

ro

:.
i

lr
)
NN
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
.
.
N
N
.
.
N
boCv1oo(JC.go-Eo(Jt-oC0)
d.L)
\zFd.