DAQ-2024-004277

1

DAQC-045-24
Site ID 10335 (B4)

MEMORANDUM

TO: STACK TEST FILE – TESORO REFINING AND MARKETING COMPANY –
Salt Lake City Refinery

THROUGH: Harold Burge, Major Source Compliance Section Manager

FROM: Paul Morris, Environmental Scientist

DATE: January 12, 2024

SUBJECT: Source: FCCU WGS
Contact: Crystal Beffa – 606-369-4370
Location: 474 West 900 North, SLC, Salt Lake County, Utah
Test Contractor: Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Permit/AO#: AO DAQE-AN103350075-18, dated January 11, 2018
FRS ID# UT000000493500004
Action Code: TR
Subject: Review of revised stack test report received January 12, 2024

On January 12, 2024, Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) received a revised report for the FCCU wet
gas scrubber. A three-run test was performed on October 24, 2023, to demonstrate compliance with
emission limits as defined in condition II.B.8.a. The test results are as follow:

Source Test Date Pollutant DAQ Result Test Result Limit

FCCU 10/24/2023 PM 10 0.65 lbs/hr 0.65 lbs/hr Na

DEVIATIONS: No deviations reported.

CONCLUSION: The FCCU PM10 emission factor appears to be acceptable.

RECOMMENDATION: None

HPV: No

ATTACHMENTS: Revised stack test report received January 12, 2024, and DAQ generated
spreadsheets.

6 , 3

Source Test Report

Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company
Salt Lake City Refinery
474 West 900 North
Salt Lake City, UT 84103

Source Tested: Wet Gas Scrubber
Test Date: October 24, 2023

Project No. AST-2023-2130-003R1

Prepared By
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley City, UT 84120

Source Test Report
Test Program Summary

AST-2023-2130-003R1 MPC – Salt Lake City, UT Page i

Regulatory Information

Permit No. DAQE-AN103350075-18

Source Information

Source Name Source ID Target Parameters
FCCU WGS PS#4 PM, PM2.5, PM10

Contact Information

Test Location Test Company Analytical Laboratories
Tesoro Refining and Marketing
Company
Salt Lake City Refinery
474 West 900 North
Salt Lake City, UT 84103

Crystal Beffa
[e-mail]
[phone]

Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley City, UT 84120

Project Manager/Field Team Leader
Charles Horton
[e-mail]
[phone]

QA/QC Manager
Kathleen Shonk
[e-mail]
[phone]

Report Coordinator
Sarah Perry
[e-mail]

Alliance Technical Group, LLC
5530 Marshall Street
Arvada, CO 80002
Eric Grosjean
[e-mail]
[phone]

Particle Technology Labs
555 Rogers St. #4
Downers Grove, IL 60515
Aubrey Montana
[e-mail]
[phone]
2 of 84

Source Test Report
Certification Statement

AST-2023-2130-003R1 MPC – Salt Lake City, UT Page ii

Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) has completed the source testing as described in this report. Results
apply only to the source(s) tested and operating condition(s) for the specific test date(s) and time(s) identified within
this report. All results are intended to be considered in their entirety, and Alliance is not responsible for use of less
than the complete test report without written consent. This report shall not be reproduced in full or in part without
written approval from the customer.

To the best of my knowledge and abilities, all information, facts and test data are correct. Data presented in this
report has been checked for completeness and is accurate, error-free and legible. Onsite testing was conducted in
accordance with approved internal Standard Operating Procedures. Any deviations or problems are detailed in the
relevant sections in the test report.

This report is only considered valid once an authorized representative of Alliance has signed in the space provided
below; any other version is considered draft. This document was prepared in portable document format (.pdf) and
contains pages as identified in the bottom footer of this document.

Charles Horton, QSTI
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Date

3 of 84

Source Test Report
Table of Contents

AST-2023-2130-003R1 MPC – Salt Lake City, UT Page iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1-1
1.1 Process/Control System Descriptions ...................................................................................................... 1-1
1.2 Project Team ............................................................................................................................................ 1-1
1.3 Site-Specific Test Plan & Notification ..................................................................................................... 1-1
1.4 Report Revision Notes ............................................................................................................................. 1-1
2.0 Summary of Results ..................................................................................................................................... 2-1
3.0 Testing Methodology .................................................................................................................................... 3-1
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 1 and 2 – Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate ..... 3-1
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3/3A – Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide ........................................................ 3-1
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 – Moisture Content ......................................................................... 3-1
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 5 and 202 – Total Particulate Matter ................................................ 3-1
3.5 Quality Assurance/Quality Control – U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3/3A ....................................... 3-2

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1-1: Project Team ........................................................................................................................................... 1-1
Table 2-1: Summary of Results ................................................................................................................................ 2-1
Table 3-1: Source Testing Methodology .................................................................................................................. 3-1

APPENDICES

Appendix A Sample Calculations
Appendix B Field Data
Appendix C Laboratory Data
Appendix D Quality Assurance/Quality Control Data
Appendix E Process Operating/Control System Data

4 of 84

Introduction

5 of 84

Source Test Report
Introduction

AST-2023-2130-003R1 MPC – Salt Lake City, UT Page 1-1

1.0 Introduction
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) to conduct
compliance testing at the Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company (Tesoro) Salt Lake City, Utah refinery. Portions
of the facility are subject to provisions of the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Air Quality
(UDAQ) Permit No. DAQE-AN103350075-18. Testing was conducted to determine the emission rates of particulate
matter (PM), particulate matter less than 10 microns (PM10) and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns (PM2.5)
from the exhaust of the Fluidized Catalytic Cracking Unit (FCCU) Belco Wet Gas Scrubber (WGS) Electrostatic
Precipitator (ESP) for the PM10 Cap calculation per the annual requirement detailed in the UDAQ permit.

Following the gravimetric analysis, the Method 5 front half PM samples were analyzed for particle size distribution
(PSD) by Particle Technology Labs (PTL) in Downers Grove, Illinois. PM mass emission rates are reported as
filterable PM2.5, filterable PM10 and total PM (filterable plus condensable PM).
1.1 Process/Control System Descriptions
The FCCU Regenerator / Carbon Monoxide Boiler (Heat Recovery Unit) is equipped with CONOx oxygen
injection, ammonia injection, and an ESP/LoTOx (WGS) system for emission controls. Emissions are exhausted
through one (1) stack designated as PS#4.
1.2 Project Team
Personnel involved in this project are identified in the following table.

Table 1-1: Project Team

MPC Personnel Crystal Beffa
Alliance Personnel
Charles Horton
Xander Krahn
Supilani Mailei
1.3 Site-Specific Test Plan & Notification
Testing was conducted in accordance with the Site-Specific Test Plan (SSTP) submitted to UDAQ by MPC.
1.4 Report Revision Notes
This report was revised on January 12, 2024 (R1). On January 8, 2024, UDEQ contacted Alliance regarding a
discrepancy in the filterable PM10 percentage calculations. Alliance investigated and discovered a miscalculation in
the determination of the filterable PM10 emission results. This report revision corrects those calculations and
updates results shown in Table 2-1 and included in Appendix B. No other changes were made.

6 of 84

Summary of Results

7 of 84

Source Test Report
Summary of Results

AST-2023-2130-003R1 MPC – Salt Lake City, UT Page 2-1

2.0 Summary of Results
Alliance conducted compliance testing at the Tesoro Salt Lake City, Utah refinery on October 24, 2023. Testing
consisted of determining the emission rates of PM, PM10 and PM2.5 from the exhaust of the FCCU Belco WGS
ESP.

Table 2-1 provides a summary of the emission testing results. Any difference between the summary results listed in
the following table and the detailed results contained in appendices is due to rounding for presentation.

Table 2-1: Summary of Results

Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 10/24/23 10/24/23 10/24/23 --
Filterable Particulate Matter 2.5 Data
Concentration, grain/dscf 0.00030 0.00010 0.00016 0.00019
Emission Rate, lb/hr 0.21 0.073 0.11 0.13
Filterable Particulate Matter 10 Data
Concentration, grain/dscf 0.0016 0.00061 0.00061 0.00093
Emission Rate, lb/hr 1.07 0.44 0.43 0.65
Total Particulate Matter 2.5 Data
Concentration, grain/dscf 0.0028 0.0025 0.0013 0.0022
Emission Rate, lb/hr 2.1 2.0 1.0 1.7
Total Particulate Matter 10 Data
Concentration, grain/dscf 0.0041 0.0030 0.0017 0.0029
Emission Rate, lb/hr 2.8 2.2 1.2 2.1

8 of 84

Testing Methodology

9 of 84

Source Test Report
Testing Methodology

AST-2023-2130-003R1 MPC – Salt Lake City, UT Page 3-1

3.0 Testing Methodology
The emission testing program was conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3-1. Method
descriptions are provided below while quality assurance/quality control data is provided in Appendix D.

Table 3-1: Source Testing Methodology

Parameter U.S. EPA Reference
Test Methods Notes/Remarks
Volumetric Flow Rate 1 & 2 Full Velocity Traverses
Oxygen / Carbon Dioxide 3 / 3A Integrated Bag / Instrumental Analysis
Moisture Content 4 Gravimetric Analysis
Total Particulate Matter 5 / 202 Isokinetic Sampling
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 1 and 2 – Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate
The sampling location and number of traverse (sampling) points were selected in accordance with U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method 1. To determine the minimum number of traverse points, the upstream and downstream
distances were equated into equivalent diameters and compared to Figure 1-1 in U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 1.

Full velocity traverses were conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 to determine the
average stack gas velocity pressure, static pressure and temperature. The velocity and static pressure measurement
system consisted of a pitot tube and inclined manometer. The stack gas temperature was measured with a K-type
thermocouple and pyrometer.

Stack gas velocity pressure and temperature readings were recorded during each test run. The data collected was
utilized to calculate the volumetric flow rate in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2.
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3/3A – Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide
The oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test
Method 3/3A. One (1) integrated Tedlar bag sample was collected during each test run. The bag samples were
analyzed on site with a gas analyzer. The remaining stack gas constituent was assumed to be nitrogen for the stack
gas molecular weight determination. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.5.
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 – Moisture Content
The stack gas moisture content (BWS) was determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4. The
gas conditioning train consisted of a series of chilled impingers. Prior to testing, each impinger was filled with a
known quantity of water or silica gel. Each impinger was analyzed gravimetrically before and after each test run on
the same balance to determine the amount of moisture condensed.
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 5 and 202 – Total Particulate Matter
The total particulate matter (filterable and condensable PM) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA
Reference Test Methods 5 and 202. The complete sampling system consisted of a stainless steel nozzle, glass-lined
probe, pre-weighed quartz filter, coil condenser, un-weighed Teflon filter, gas conditioning train, pump and
calibrated dry gas meter. The gas conditioning train consisted of a coiled condenser and four (4) chilled impingers.
The first, and second impingers were initially empty, the third contained 100 mL of de-ionized water and the last
10 of 84

Source Test Report
Testing Methodology

AST-2023-2130-003R1 MPC – Salt Lake City, UT Page 3-2

impinger contained 200-300 grams of silica gel. The un-weighed 90 mm Teflon filter was placed between the
second and third impingers. The probe liner heating system was maintained at a temperature of 248 ±25°F, and the
impinger temperature was maintained at 68°F or less throughout testing. The temperature of the Teflon filter was
maintained greater than 65°F but less than or equal to 85°F.

Following the completion of each test run, the sampling train was leak checked at a vacuum pressure greater than or
equal to the highest vacuum pressure observed during the run. Condensate was collected in the first dry impinger,
therefore the front-half of the sample train (the nozzle, probe, and heated pre-weighed filter) was removed in order
to purge the back-half of the sample train (coil condenser, first and second impingers and CPM filter). A glass
bubbler was inserted into the first impinger. If needed, de-ionized ultra-filtered (DIUF) water was added to the first
impinger to raise the water level above the bubbler, then the coil condenser was replaced. Zero nitrogen was
connected to the condenser, and a 60-minute purge at 14 liters per minute was conducted. After the completion of
the nitrogen purge the impinger contents were measured for moisture gain.

The pre-weighed quartz filter was carefully removed and placed in container 1. The probe, nozzle and front half of
the filter holder were rinsed six (6) and three (3) times with acetone to remove any adhering particulate matter and
these rinses were recovered in container 2. All containers were sealed, labeled and liquid levels marked for
transport to the identified laboratory for filterable particulate matter analysis.

The contents of impingers 1 and 2 were recovered in container CPM Cont. #1. The back half of the filterable PM
filter holder, the coil condenser, impingers 1 and 2 and all connecting glassware were rinsed with DIUF water and
then rinsed with acetone, followed by hexane. The water rinses were added to container CPM Cont. #1 while the
solvent rinses were recovered in container CPM Cont. #2. The Teflon filter was removed from the filter holder and
placed in container CPM Cont. #3. The front half of the condensable PM filter holder was rinsed with DIUF water
and then with acetone, followed by hexane. The water rinse was added to container CPM Cont. #1 while the solvent
rinses were added to container CPM Cont. #2. All containers were sealed, labeled and liquid levels marked for
transport to the identified laboratory for condensable particulate matter analysis.
3.5 Quality Assurance/Quality Control – U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3/3A
Cylinder calibration gases used met EPA Protocol 1 (+/- 2%) standards. Copies of all calibration gas certificates can
be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix.

Low-Level gas was introduced directly to the analyzer. After adjusting the analyzer to the Low-Level gas
concentration and once the analyzer reading was stable, the analyzer value was recorded. This process was repeated
for the High-Level gas. For the Calibration Error Test, Low, Mid, and High-Level calibration gases were
sequentially introduced directly to the analyzer. All values were within 2.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5%
absolute difference.

At the completion of testing, the data was also saved to the Alliance server. All data was reviewed by the Field
Team Leader before leaving the facility. Once arriving at Alliance’s office, all written and electronic data was
relinquished to the report coordinator and then a final review was performed by the Project Manager.

11 of 84

Appendix A

12 of 84
Appendix A
Example Calculations
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Run No.:
Parameter:
Meter Pressure (Pm), in. Hg
where,
Pb 25.57 = barometric pressure, in. Hg
ΔH 2.388 = pressure differential of orifice, in H2O
Pm 25.75 = in. Hg
Absolute Stack Gas Pressure (Ps), in. Hg
where,
Pb 25.57 = barometric pressure, in. Hg
Pg -0.01 = static pressure, in. H2O
Ps 25.57 = in. Hg
Standard Meter Volume (Vmstd), dscf
where,
Y 1 = meter correction factor
Vm 52.267 = meter volume, cf
Pm 25.75 = absolute meter pressure, in. Hg
Tm 517.1 = absolute meter temperature, oR
Vmstd 45.891 = dscf
Standard Wet Volume (Vwstd), scf
where,
Vlc 402.9 = weight of H2O collected, g
Vwstd 19.001 = scf
Moisture Fraction (BWSsat), dimensionless (theoretical at saturated conditions)
where,
Ts 145.0 = stack temperature, °F
Ps 25.57 = absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
BWSsat 0.259 = dimensionless
Moisture Fraction (BWS), dimensionless (measured)
where,
Vwstd 19.001 = standard wet volume, scf
Vmstd 45.891 = standard meter volume, dscf
BWS 0.293 = dimensionless
MPC-Tesoro - Salt Lake City Refinery
FCCU Wet Gas Scrubber
AST-2023-2130
1
PM
Pm ൌ Pb ൅ Δ H
13.6
Ps ൌ Pb ൅ Pg
13.6
𝑉𝑚𝑠𝑡𝑑 ൌ 17.636 ൈ Y ൈ Vm ൈ Pm
𝑇𝑚
Vwstd ൌ 0.04716 ൈ Vlc
BWSsat ൌ 10଺.ଷ଻ି ଶ,଼ଶ଻
୘ୱାଷ଺ହ
Ps
BWS ൌ Vwstd
ሺVwstd ൅ Vmstdሻ
13 of 84
Appendix A
Example Calculations
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Run No.:
Parameter:
MPC-Tesoro - Salt Lake City Refinery
FCCU Wet Gas Scrubber
AST-2023-2130
1
PM
Moisture Fraction (BWS), dimensionless
where,
BWSsat 0.259 = moisture fraction (theoretical at saturated conditions)
BWSmsd 0.293 = moisture fraction (measured)
BWS 0.259
Molecular Weight (DRY) (Md), lb/lb-mole
where,
CO2 14.8 = carbon dioxide concentration, %
O2 5.1 = oxygen concentration, %
Md 30.57 = lb/lb mol
Molecular Weight (WET) (Ms), lb/lb-mole
where,
Md 30.57 = molecular weight (DRY), lb/lb mol
BWS 0.259 = moisture fraction, dimensionless
Ms 27.32 = lb/lb mol
Average Velocity (Vs), ft/sec
where,
Cp 0.840 = pitot tube coefficient
Δ P1/2 0.722 = velocity head of stack gas, (in. H2O)1/2
Ts 604.7 = absolute stack temperature, °R
Ps 25.57 = absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
Ms 27.32 = molecular weight of stack gas, lb/lb mol
Vs 48.3 = ft/sec
Average Stack Gas Flow at Stack Conditions (Qa), acfm
where,
Vs 48.3 = stack gas velocity, ft/sec
As 50.27 = cross-sectional area of stack, ft2
Qa 145,582 = acfm
Average Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions (Qs), dscfm
where,
Qa 145,582 = average stack gas flow at stack conditions, acfm
BWS 0.259 = moisture fraction, dimensionless
Ps 25.57 = absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
Ts 604.7 = absolute stack temperature, °R
Qs 80,445 = dscfm
Md ൌ ሺ0.44 ൈ % COଶ ሻ ൅ ሺ0.32 ൈ % O2ሻ ൅ ሺ0.28 ሺ100 െ % COଶ െ % O2ሻሻ
Ms ൌ Md ሺ1 െ BWSሻ ൅ 18.015 ሺBWSሻ
Qa ൌ 60 ൈ Vs ൈ As
Qs ൌ 17.636 ൈ Qa ൈ ሺ1 െ BWSሻ ൈ Ps
Ts
Vs ൌ 85.49 ൈ Cp ൈ ሺΔ P ଵ/ଶ ሻ avg ൈ Ts
Ps x Ms
BWS ൌ BWSmsd unless BWSsat ൏ BWSmsd
14 of 84
Appendix A
Example Calculations
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Run No.:
Parameter:
MPC-Tesoro - Salt Lake City Refinery
FCCU Wet Gas Scrubber
AST-2023-2130
1
PM
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Check (Yqa), dimensionless
where,
Y 1 = meter correction factor, dimensionless
Θ 60 = run time, min.
Vm 52.267 = total meter volume, dcf
Tm 517.1 = absolute meter temperature, °R
ΔH@ 1.922 = orifice meter calibration coefficient, in. H2O
Pb 25.57 = barometric pressure, in. Hg
ΔH avg 2.388 = average pressure differential of orifice, in H2O
Md 30.57 = molecular weight (DRY), lb/lb mol
(Δ H)1/2 1.534 = average squareroot pressure differential of orifice, (in. H2O)1/2
Yqa 0.9 = percent
Volume of Nozzle (Vn), ft3
where,
Ts 604.7 = absolute stack temperature, °R
Ps 25.57 = absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
Vlc 402.9 = volume of H2O collected, ml
Vm 52.267 = meter volume, cf
Pm 25.75 = absolute meter pressure, in. Hg
Y 1.000 = meter correction factor, unitless
Tm 517.1 = absolute meter temperature, oR
Vn 86.966 = volume of nozzle, ft3
Isokinetic Sampling Rate (I), %
where,*
Vn 86.966 = nozzle volume, ft3
θ 60.0 = run time, minutes
An 0.00044 = area of nozzle, ft2
Vs 48.3 = average velocity, ft/sec
I 107.9 = %
Filterable PM Concentration (Cs), grain/dscf
where,
Mn 20.2 = filterable PM mass, mg
Vmstd 45.891 = standard meter volume, dscf
Cs 0.0068 = grain/dscf
C௦ ൌ M୬ ൈ 0.0154
Vmstd
Yqa ൌ
Y െ Θ
Vm 0.0319 ൈ Tm ൈ 29
Δ𝐻@ ൈ Pb ൅ Δ Havg.
13.6 ൈ𝑀𝑑
ΔH avg.
𝑌 ൈ 100
Vn ൌ 𝑇𝑠
𝑃𝑠 0.002669 ൈ𝑉𝑙𝑐൅Vm ൈ𝑃𝑚ൈ𝑌
𝑇𝑚
15 of 84
Appendix A
Example Calculations
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Run No.:
Parameter:
MPC-Tesoro - Salt Lake City Refinery
FCCU Wet Gas Scrubber
AST-2023-2130
1
PM
Filterable PM Emission Rate (PMR), lb/hr
where,
Cs 0.0068 = filterable PM concentration, grain/dscf
Qs 80,445 = average stack gas flow at standard conditions, dscfm
PMR 4.7 = lb/hr
Filterable PM Emission Rate (ERPMTPY), ton/yr
where,
PMR 4.7 = filterable PM emission rate, lb/hr
ERPMTPY 20.5 = ton/yr
Condensable PM Concentration (CCPM), grain/dscf
where,
MCPM 7.5 = condensable PM mass, mg
Vmstd 45.891 = standard meter volume, dscf
CCPM 0.0025 = grain/dscf
Condensable PM Emission Rate (ERCPM), lb/hr
where,
CCPM 0.0025 = condensable PM concentration, grain/dscf
Qs 80,445 = average stack gas flow at standard conditions, dscfm
ERCPM 1.7 = lb/hr
Condensable PM Emission Rate (ERCPMTPY), ton/yr
where,
ERCPM 1.7 = condensable PM emission rate, lb/hr
ERCPMTPY 7.6 = ton/yr
Total PM Concentration (CTPM), grain/dscf
where,
Cs 0.0068 = filterable PM concentration, grain/dscf
CCPM 0.0025 = condensable PM concentration, grain/dscf
CTPM 0.0093 = grain/dscf
PMR ൌ Cୱ ൈ Qs ൈ 60
7.0E ൅ 03
Cେ୔୑ ൌ Mେ୔୑ ൈ 0.0154
Vmstd
ERେ୔୑  ൌ Cେ୔୑ ൈ Qs ൈ 60 𝑚𝑖𝑛
ℎ𝑟
7.0E ൅ 03
𝐸𝑅஼௉ெ்௉௒ ൌ
𝐸𝑅஼௉ெ ൈ 8,760 ℎ𝑟
𝑦𝑟
2.0𝐸൅03
𝐶்௉ெ ൌ𝐶ௌ ൅𝐶஼௉ெ
ER ୔୑୘୔ଢ଼ ൌ PMR ൈ 8,760
2.0E ൅ 03
16 of 84
Appendix A
Example Calculations
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Run No.:
Parameter:
MPC-Tesoro - Salt Lake City Refinery
FCCU Wet Gas Scrubber
AST-2023-2130
1
PM
Total PM Emission Rate (ERTPM), lb/hr
where,
PMR 4.7 = filterable PM emission rate, lb/hr
ERCPM 1.7 = condensable PM emission rate, lb/hr
ERTPM 6.4 = lb/hr
Total PM Emission Rate (ERTPMTPY), ton/yr
where,
ERPMTPY 20.5 = filterable PM emission rate, ton/yr
ERCPMTPY 7.6 = condensable PM emission rate, ton/yr
ERTPMTPY 28.1 = ton/yr
𝐸𝑅்௉ெ ൌ𝑃𝑀𝑅൅𝐸𝑅஼௉ெ
𝐸𝑅்௉ெ்௉௒ ൌ𝐸𝑅௉ெ்௉௒ ൅𝐸𝑅஼௉ெ்௉௒
17 of 84

Appendix B

18 of 84
Emission Calculations
Location
Source
Project No.
Parameter
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 10/24/23 10/24/23 10/24/23 --
Start Time 9:45 12:00 14:12 --
Stop Time 10:55 13:20 15:26 --
Run Time, min (θ)60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0
Coke Burn Rate, lb/hr (FR)29,101 29,097 29,103 29,100
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (Pb)25.57 25.62 25.62 25.60
Meter Correction Factor (Y)1 1 1 1
Orifice Calibration Value (ΔH @)1.922 1.922 1.922 1.922
Meter Volume, ft3 (Vm)52.267 53.688 47.295 51.083
Meter Temperature, °F (Tm)57.5 67.5 67.8 64.3
Meter Temperature, °R (Tm)517.1 527.1 527.5 523.9
Meter Orifice Pressure, in. WC (ΔH)2.388 2.492 1.888 2.256
Volume H2O Collected, mL (Vlc)402.9 282.0 172.2 285.7
Nozzle Diameter, in (Dn)0.285 0.285 0.285 0.285
Area of Nozzle, ft2 (An)0.0004 0.0004 0.0004 0.0004
Filterable PM Mass, mg (Mn)20.2 11.7 6.9 12.9
Condensable PM Mass, mg (MCPM)7.5 7.2 3.0 5.9
PM2.5 PSD Results, % of Total Filterable PM (PSDPM2.5)4.4 2.6 6.0 4.3
PM10 PSD Results, % of Total Filterable PM (PSDPM10)22.9 15.7 23.3 20.6
Filterable PM2.5 Mass, mg (MPM2.5)0.9 0.3 0.4 0.5
Filterable PM10 Mass, mg (MPM10)4.6 1.8 1.6 2.7
Standard Meter Volume, ft3 (Vmstd)45.891 46.348 40.730 44.323
Standard Water Volume, ft3 (Vwstd)19.001 13.299 8.121 13.474
Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd)0.293 0.223 0.166 0.227
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat)0.259 0.277 0.351 0.296
Moisture Fraction (BWS)0.259 0.223 0.166 0.216
Meter Pressure, in Hg (Pm)25.75 25.80 25.76 25.77
Volume at Nozzle, ft3 (Vn)86.966 80.166 66.712 77.95
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, (%)(I)107.9 104.1 93.2 101.7
DGM Calibration Check Value, (+/- 5%)(Yqa)0.9 0.6 1.2 0.9
Filterable PM Concentration, grain/dscf (Cs)0.0068 0.0039 0.0026 0.0044
Filterable PM Emission Rate, lb/hr (PMR)4.7 2.8 1.9 3.1
Filterable PM Emission Rate, ton/yr (ERFPM)20.5 12.3 8.1 13.6
Condensable PM Concentration, grain/dscf (CCPM)0.0025 0.0024 0.0011 0.0020
Condensable PM Emission Rate, lb/hr (ERCPM)1.7 1.7 0.8 1.4
Condensable PM Emission Rate, ton/yr (ERCPM)7.6 7.6 3.5 6.2
Total PM Concentration, grain/dscf (CTPM)0.0093 0.0063 0.0038 0.0065
Total PM Emission Rate, lb/hr (ERTPM)6.4 4.5 2.7 4.5
Total PM Emission Rate, ton/yr (ERTPM)28.1 19.9 11.6 19.9
Filterable PM2.5 Concentration, grain/dscf (CPM2.5)0.00030 0.00010 0.00016 0.00019
Filterable PM2.5 Emission Rate, lb/hr (ERPM2.5)0.21 0.073 0.11 0.13
Filterable PM2.5 Emission Rate, ton/yr (ERPM2.5)0.90 0.32 0.49 0.57
Filterable PM10 Concentration, grain/dscf (CPM10)0.00156 0.00061 0.00061 0.00093
Filterable PM10 Emission Rate, lb/hr (ERPM10)1.07 0.44 0.43 0.65
Filterable PM10 Emission Rate, ton/yr (ERPM10)4.7 1.9 1.89 2.8
Total PM2.5 Concentration, grain/dscf (CTPM2.5)0.0028 0.0025 0.0013 0.0022
Total PM2.5 Emission Rate, lb/hr (ERTPM2.5)2.8 2.2 1.2 2.1
Total PM2.5 Emission Rate, ton/yr (ERTPM2.5)8.5 7.9 4.0 6.8
Total PM10 Concentration, grain/dscf (CTPM10)0.0041 0.0030 0.0017 0.0029
Total PM10 Emission Rate, lb/hr (ERTPM10)2.8 2.2 1.2 2.1
Total PM10 Emission Rate, ton/yr (ERTPM10)12.3 9.5 5.4 9.1
MPC-Tesoro - Salt Lake City Refinery
FCCU Wet Gas Scrubber
AST-2023-2130
EMISSION CALCULATIONS
ISOKINETIC DATA
INPUT DATA
PM
19 of 84
Emission Calculations
Location
Source
Project No.
Parameter
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 10/24/23 10/24/23 10/24/23 --
Start Time 9:45 12:00 14:12 --
Stop Time 10:55 13:20 15:26 --
Run Time, min 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0
Point 1 0.70 0.77 0.42 0.63
Point 2 0.55 0.81 0.40 0.59
Point 3 0.50 0.71 0.46 0.56
Point 4 0.51 0.48 0.41 0.47
Point 5 0.49 0.45 0.48 0.47
Point 6 0.46 0.68 0.51 0.55
Point 7 0.41 0.65 0.54 0.53
Point 8 0.44 0.58 0.59 0.54
Point 9 0.37 0.56 0.56 0.50
Point 10 0.38 0.61 0.49 0.49
Point 11 0.39 0.60 0.43 0.47
Point 12 0.40 0.62 0.46 0.49
Point 13 0.65 0.48 0.45 0.53
Point 14 0.57 0.40 0.50 0.49
Point 15 0.55 0.43 0.49 0.49
Point 16 0.67 0.44 0.40 0.50
Point 17 0.90 0.45 0.51 0.62
Point 18 0.81 0.41 0.49 0.57
Point 19 0.55 0.39 0.45 0.46
Point 20 0.57 0.36 0.41 0.45
Point 21 0.49 0.40 0.45 0.45
Point 22 0.50 0.54 0.40 0.48
Point 23 0.46 0.55 0.42 0.48
Point 24 0.39 0.50 0.40 0.43
Square Root of ΔP, (in. WC)1/2 (ΔP) 0.722 0.728 0.680 0.710
Pitot Tube Coefficient (Cp) 0.840 0.840 0.840 0.840
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (Pb) 25.57 25.62 25.62 25.60
Static Pressure, in. WC (Pg) -0.01 -0.01 -0.01 -0.01
Stack Pressure, in. Hg (Ps) 25.57 25.62 25.62 25.60
Stack Cross-sectional Area, ft2 (As) 50.27 50.27 50.27 50.27
Temperature, °F (Ts) 145.0 147.8 157.5 150.1
Temperature, °R (Ts) 604.7 607.5 617.2 609.8
Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.293 0.223 0.166 0.227
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat) 0.259 0.277 0.351 0.296
Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.259 0.223 0.166 0.216
O2 Concentration, %(O2) 5.1 5.3 4.9 5.10
CO2 Concentration, %(CO2) 14.8 14.7 14.9 14.80
Molecular Weight, lb/lb-mole (dry) (Md) 30.57 30.56 30.58 30.57
Molecular Weight, lb/lb-mole (wet) (Ms) 27.32 27.77 28.49 27.86
Velocity, ft/sec (Vs) 48.3 48.3 44.9 47.1
At Stack Conditions, acfm (Qa) 145,582 145,637 135,350 142,190
At Standard Conditions, scfm (Qsw) 108,570 108,315 99,081 105,322
At Standard Conditions, dscfm (Qs) 80,445 84,165 82,610 82,407
MPC-Tesoro - Salt Lake City Refinery
FCCU Wet Gas Scrubber
AST-2023-2130
VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE
CALCULATED DATA
VELOCITY HEAD, in. WC
PM
20 of 84
Method 1 Data
Location
Source
Project No.
Date:
Vertical
Circular
105.00 in
9.00 in
96.00 in
50.27 ft2
2
35.0 ft
4.4 (must be ≥ 0.5)
20.0 ft
2.5 (must be ≥ 2)
24
24
1
Measurer (Initial and Date):XGK 10/24
Reviewer (Initial and Date):SPR 10/24
23456789101112
1 14.6 -- 6.7 -- 4.4 -- 3.2 -- 2.6 -- 2.1 1 2.1 2.02 11
2 85.4 -- 25.0 -- 14.6 -- 10.5 -- 8.2 -- 6.7 2 6.7 6.43 15 7/16
3 -- -- 75.0 -- 29.6 -- 19.4 -- 14.6 -- 11.8 3 11.8 11.33 20 5/16
4 -- -- 93.3 -- 70.4 -- 32.3 -- 22.6 -- 17.7 4 17.7 16.99 26
5 -- -- -- -- 85.4 -- 67.7 -- 34.2 -- 25.0 5 25.0 24.00 33
6 -- -- -- -- 95.6 -- 80.6 -- 65.8 -- 35.6 6 35.6 34.18 43 3/16
7 -- -- -- -- -- -- 89.5 -- 77.4 -- 64.4 7 64.4 61.82 70 13/16
8 -- -- -- -- -- -- 96.8 -- 85.4 -- 75.0 8 75.0 72.00 81
9 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 91.8 -- 82.3 9 82.3 79.01 88
10 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 97.4 -- 88.2 10 88.2 84.67 93 11/16
11 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 93.3 11 93.3 89.57 98 9/16
12 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 97.9 12 97.9 93.98 103
*Percent of stack diameter from inside wall to traverse point.
A = 35 ft.
B = 20 ft.
Depth of Duct = 96 in.
Duct Orientation:
MPC-Tesoro - Salt Lake City Refinery
FCCU Wet Gas Scrubber
AST-2023-2130
10/24/23
Stack Parameters
Duct Design:
Nipple Length:
Depth of Duct:
Cross Sectional Area of Duct:
Distance from Far Wall to Outside of Port:
No. of Test Ports:
Number of Readings per Point:
Distance A:
Distance A Duct Diameters:
Distance B:
Distance B Duct Diameters:
Minimum Number of Traverse Points:
Actual Number of Traverse Points:
CIRCULAR DUCT
Number of traverse points on a diameter
Stack Diagram
Cross Sectional Area
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS
Traverse
Point
% of
Diameter
Distance
from inside
wall
Distance
from
outside of
port
Upstream
Disturbance
Downstream
Disturbance
B
A
21 of 84
Cyclonic Flow Check
Location MPC-Tesoro - Salt Lake City Refinery
Source FCCU Wet Gas Scrubber
Project No. AST-2023-2130
Date 10/24/23
Sample Point Angle (ΔP=0)
1 6
2 2
3 1
4 1
5 1
6 0
7 0
8 1
9 2
10 3
11 3
12 4
13 7
14 5
15 8
16 2
17 1
18 1
19 0
20 1
21 0
22 2
23 5
24 5
Average 3
22 of 84
Method 4 Data
Location
Source
Project No.
Parameter
Analysis
Run 1 Date:10/24/23
Impinger No.1234Total
Contents Empty Empty H2O Silica --
Initial Mass, g 497.0 631.4 699.5 936.7 2764.6
Final Mass, g 883.0 634.5 700.8 949.2 3167.5
Gain 386.0 3.1 1.3 12.5 402.9
Run 2 Date:10/24/23
Impinger No.1234Total
Contents Empty Empty H2O Silica --
Initial Mass, g 762.1 640.1 640.0 961.7 3003.9
Final Mass, g 1019.5 648.1 642.1 976.2 3285.9
Gain 257.4 8.0 2.1 14.5 282.0
Run 3 Date:10/24/23
Impinger No.1234Total
Contents Empty Empty H2O Silica --
Initial Mass, g 753.3 631.4 700.8 938.5 3024.0
Final Mass, g 909.5 631.7 703.0 952.0 3196.2
Gain 156.2 0.3 2.2 13.5 172.2
MPC-Tesoro - Salt Lake City Refinery
FCCU Wet Gas Scrubber
AST-2023-2130
PM
Gravimetric
23 of 84
Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Start Time:Source:
Date: VALID End Time:Project No.:AST-2023-2130 PM
Moisture: 20.0 % est.Est. Tm: 141 °F Pb: 25.57 in. Hg
Barometric: 25.62 in. Hg Est. Ts: 142 °F Pg: -0.01 in. WC
Static Press: -0.10 in. WC Est. ΔP: 0.58 in. WC O2:5.1 %
Stack Press: 25.61 in. Hg Est. Dn: 0.240 in.CO2:14.8 %
CO2:14.0 %Target Rate: 0.75 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
O2:5.0 %LEAK CHECKS Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1 (cf)--
N2/CO:81.0 %0.840 S-type Leak Rate (cfm):0.002 -- -- -- 0.001 Mid 2 (cf)--
Md: 30.44 lb/lb-mole SS282 SS Vacuum (in Hg):15 -- -- -- 13 Mid 3 (cf)--
Ms: 27.95 lb/lb-mole Pitot Tube:Pass -- -- -- Pass --
Stack Probe Filter Imp Exit Aux
Amb.Amb. Amb. Amb.
Amb.
Begin End 61 Ideal Actual 62 61 61 61
1 0.00 2.50 0.70 141 3.11 3.10 7 253 244 49 63 102.2
55.03
2 2.50 5.00 0.55 144 2.43 2.40 8 263 258 63 73 100.5
48.90
3 5.00 7.50 0.50 146 2.22 2.20 7 268 266 63 74 101.3
46.71
4 7.50 10.00 0.51 145 2.27 2.30 7 268 267 59 74 101.7
47.13
5 10.00 12.50 0.49 145 2.18 2.20 7 268 271 57 76 101.8
46.20
6 12.50 15.00 0.46 146 2.05 2.10 5 267 269 55 77 101.4
44.80
7 15.00 17.50 0.41 146 1.83 1.80 5 269 267 53 76 100.4
42.29
8 17.50 20.00 0.44 146 1.96 2.00 5 269 269 55 77 101.3
43.81
9 20.00 22.50 0.37 146 1.65 1.70 5 266 263 55 78 101.1
40.18
10 22.50 25.00 0.38 145 1.71 1.70 5 262 269 51 79 100.9
40.68
11 25.00 27.50 0.39 144 1.76 1.80 5 265 271 54 78 100.7
41.18
12 27.50 30.00 0.40 143 1.80 1.80 5 265 264 54 74 100.1
41.67
13 30.00 32.50 0.65 145 2.92 2.90 8 258 255 64 81 100.4
53.21
14 32.50 35.00 0.57 145 2.56 2.60 8 254 250 64 80 102.2
49.83
15 35.00 37.50 0.55 145 2.47 2.50 8 247 255 67 81 101.8
48.94
16 37.50 40.00 0.67 146 3.00 3.00 10 248 256 67 81 101.2
54.07
17 40.00 42.50 0.90 146 4.03 4.00 12 267 272 59 79 99.1
62.66
18 42.50 45.00 0.81 144 3.65 3.70 11 268 268 58 75 102.7
59.35
19 45.00 47.50 0.55 145 2.48 2.50 7 267 269 59 73 102.1
48.94
20 47.50 50.00 0.57 146 2.57 2.60 7 270 270 59 78 101.3
49.87
21 50.00 52.50 0.49 145 2.22 2.20 7 271 268 59 77 101.2
46.20
22 52.50 55.00 0.50 146 2.26 2.30 7 271 262 61 80 101.0
46.71
23 55.00 57.50 0.46 145 2.08 2.10 6 269 262 61 81 100.5
44.76
24 57.50 60.00 0.39 145 1.77 1.80 5 271 267 62 81 101.2 41.21
Final DGM:
Max
Vac %ISO BWS
60.0 min 52.267 ft3 0.53 in. WC 57.5 °F 145.0 °F 12 2.388 in. WC 107.9 0.259
Gas Temperatures (°F)
61
62
62
62
5.243
54
56
61
54
60
59
61
59
59
Vs
(fps)
Pump
Vac
(in. Hg)
Orifice Press.
ΔH
(in. WC)
Sa
m
p
l
e

Pt
.
Gas Temperatures (°F)
DGM Average
Amb.
Sample Time
(minutes)
Dry Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
59
57
58
58
881.645
50
50
53
865.320
862.806
875.920
FCCU Wet Gas Scrubber
STACK DATA (EST)
MB706
Run 1
9:45
10:55
MPC-Tesoro - Salt Lake City Refinery
STACK DATA (EST) EQUIPMENT MOIST. DATA
Vlc (ml)
402.9
K-FACTOR
STACK DATA (FINAL)FILTER NO.
Parameter:
16729-C
10/24/23
1
1.922
Meter Box ID:
Y:
0.9
YqaΔHTsΔPTm
RE
S
U
L
T
S
915.073
VmRun Time
ΔH @ (in.WC):
Probe ID:
Nozzle ID:
Nozzle Dn (in.):
902.285
Liner Material:
873.885
Pitot
Tube
ΔP
(in WC)
891.995
899.520
877.825
867.510
887.274
869.625
896.720
879.815
Pitot ID:
894.250
889.690
885.380
glass
Pr702-9
908.975
911.120
Mid-Point Leak Check Vol (cf):0.285
54
883.500
906.845
61
% ISO
913.170
62
904.555
Pr702-9
Pitot Cp/Type:
871.775 54
54
24 of 84
Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Start Time:Source:
Date: VALID End Time:Project No.:AST-2023-2130 PM
Moisture: 20.0 % est.Est. Tm: 57 °F Pb: 25.62 in. Hg
Barometric: 25.62 in. Hg Est. Ts: 145 °F Pg: -0.01 in. WC
Static Press: -0.10 in. WC Est. ΔP: 0.53 in. WC O2:5.3 %
Stack Press: 25.61 in. Hg Est. Dn: 0.265 in.CO2:14.7 %
CO2:14.0 %Target Rate: 0.75 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
O2:5.0 %LEAK CHECKS Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1 (cf)--
N2/CO:81.0 %0.840 S-type Leak Rate (cfm):0.010 -- -- -- 0.010 Mid 2 (cf)--
Md: 30.44 lb/lb-mole SS282 SS Vacuum (in Hg):17 -- -- -- 15 Mid 3 (cf)--
Ms: 27.95 lb/lb-mole Pitot Tube:Pass -- -- -- Pass --
Stack Probe Filter Imp Exit Aux
Amb.Amb. Amb. Amb.
Amb.
Begin End -- Ideal Actual -- -- -- --
1 0.00 2.50 0.77 145 3.49 3.50 10 258 261 61 65 100.8
57.91
2 2.50 5.00 0.81 145 3.66 3.70 11 259 258 60 65 101.3
59.40
3 5.00 7.50 0.71 146 3.21 3.20 10 261 264 58 66 101.0
55.66
4 7.50 10.00 0.48 145 2.17 3.10 10 261 265 59 66 102.8
45.72
5 10.00 12.50 0.45 145 2.05 2.10 7 261 264 59 66 101.5
44.27
6 12.50 15.00 0.68 145 3.09 3.10 9 266 262 60 68 102.7
54.42
7 15.00 17.50 0.65 145 2.96 3.00 10 265 271 62 68 103.0
53.21
8 17.50 20.00 0.58 145 2.64 2.60 8 266 270 62 68 102.4
50.26
9 20.00 22.50 0.56 144 2.57 2.60 8 266 272 63 69 100.5
49.35
10 22.50 25.00 0.61 144 2.79 2.80 8 266 271 63 70 100.7
51.50
11 25.00 27.50 0.60 145 2.75 2.80 8 267 272 65 71 101.0
51.12
12 27.50 30.00 0.62 145 2.84 2.80 8 267 268 65 72 101.4
51.97
13 30.00 32.50 0.48 144 2.20 2.20 6 270 269 66 70 100.8
45.69
14 32.50 35.00 0.40 151 1.82 1.80 5 265 268 66 74 101.0
41.95
15 35.00 37.50 0.43 151 1.95 2.00 6 268 270 64 74 101.7
43.49
16 37.50 40.00 0.44 151 2.00 2.00 6 265 268 64 75 100.1
43.99
17 40.00 42.50 0.45 150 2.04 2.00 6 267 265 63 77 101.6
44.45
18 42.50 45.00 0.41 152 1.86 1.90 6 267 267 66 77 100.9
42.50
19 45.00 47.50 0.39 152 1.77 1.80 6 260 266 66 77 102.7
41.45
20 47.50 50.00 0.36 152 1.63 1.60 5 261 267 61 72 101.0
39.83
21 50.00 52.50 0.40 152 1.82 1.90 6 262 269 60 72 100.9
41.98
22 52.50 55.00 0.54 151 2.45 2.50 7 263 271 61 72 103.5
48.74
23 55.00 57.50 0.55 151 2.50 2.50 7 268 269 62 73 102.6
49.19
24 57.50 60.00 0.50 152 2.27 2.30 7 269 270 63 75 100.3 46.94
Final DGM:
Max
Vac %ISO BWS
60.0 min 53.688 ft3 0.54 in. WC 67.5 °F 147.8 °F 11 2.492 in. WC 104.1 0.223
940.865
945.635
948.065
950.190
943.255
956.155
952.125
954.145
958.220
960.175
962.120
69
64
69
70
69
68
68
68
68
68
69
69
69
918.975
933.700
929.080
931.140
921.635
926.935
924.375
963.960
968.200
965.895
ΔP
972.663
970.510
65
64
64
938.570
936.210
70
70
12:00
K-FACTOR
16937-c
STACK DATA (EST)
Dry Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
EQUIPMENT
FCCU Wet Gas Scrubber
Vs
(fps)
MPC-Tesoro - Salt Lake City Refinery
10/24/23
STACK DATA (EST)
MB706
Sample Time
(minutes)
Nozzle Dn (in.):
% ISO
Nozzle ID:
13:20
STACK DATA (FINAL)
Mid-Point Leak Check Vol (cf):
Run 2 Parameter:
Meter Box ID:
Sa
m
p
l
e

Pt
.
RE
S
U
L
T
S
Run Time
0.6
Vm ΔH Yqa
Pump
Vac
(in. Hg)
Gas Temperatures (°F)
66
66
64
66
TsTm
68
68
Liner Material:
Gas Temperatures (°F)
4.49
Pitot ID:
Pitot Cp/Type:
0.285
Pr702-9
Pitot
Tube
ΔP
(in WC)
Pr702-9
glass
Orifice Press.
ΔH
(in. WC)
DGM Average
Amb.
--
MOIST. DATA
Vlc (ml)
282.0
FILTER NO.
Y:
ΔH @ (in.WC):
Probe ID:
1
1.922
25 of 84
Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Start Time:Source:
Date: VALID End Time:Project No.:AST-2023-2130 PM
Moisture: 25.0 % est.Est. Tm: 67 °F Pb: 25.62 in. Hg
Barometric: 25.62 in. Hg Est. Ts: 148 °F Pg: -0.01 in. WC
Static Press: -0.10 in. WC Est. ΔP: 0.54 in. WC O2:4.9 %
Stack Press: 25.61 in. Hg Est. Dn: 0.269 in.CO2:14.9 %
CO2:14.0 %Target Rate: 0.75 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
O2:5.0 %LEAK CHECKS Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1 (cf)--
N2/CO:81.0 %0.840 S-type Leak Rate (cfm):0.001 -- -- -- 0.001 Mid 2 (cf)--
Md: 30.44 lb/lb-mole SS282 SS Vacuum (in Hg):20 -- -- -- 10 Mid 3 (cf)--
Ms: 27.33 lb/lb-mole Pitot Tube:Pass -- -- -- Pass --
Stack Probe Filter Imp Exit Aux
Amb.Amb. Amb. Amb.
Amb.
Begin End -- Ideal Actual -- -- -- --
1 0.00 2.50 0.42 162 1.68 1.90 5 270 250 58 66 102.1
43.86
2 2.50 5.00 0.40 165 1.59 1.60 5 267 271 59 66 101.5
42.90
3 5.00 7.50 0.46 163 1.83 1.80 5 267 270 59 67 105.3
45.94
4 7.50 10.00 0.41 159 1.64 1.70 5 269 271 60 68 101.0
43.23
5 10.00 12.50 0.48 159 1.92 1.90 5 269 272 60 67 101.8
46.77
6 12.50 15.00 0.51 156 2.06 2.10 6 271 261 61 68 100.4
48.10
7 15.00 17.50 0.54 157 2.17 2.20 6 269 262 61 68 100.7
49.53
8 17.50 20.00 0.59 156 2.38 2.40 7 269 253 62 69 100.9
51.73
9 20.00 22.50 0.56 155 2.25 2.30 6 269 271 62 66 101.0
50.36
10 22.50 25.00 0.49 156 1.97 2.00 5 269 270 62 67 101.5
47.14
11 25.00 27.50 0.43 156 1.73 1.70 5 269 272 62 67 100.7
44.16
12 27.50 30.00 0.46 152 1.87 1.90 5 269 264 63 68 101.5
45.53
13 30.00 32.50 0.45 151 1.84 1.80 5 268 265 65 68 99.6
44.99
14 32.50 35.00 0.50 159 2.02 2.00 5 270 261 55 67 101.9
47.74
15 35.00 37.50 0.49 158 1.97 2.00 5 264 266 56 67 103.8
47.22
16 37.50 40.00 0.40 158 1.61 1.60 3 269 264 58 68 102.6
42.66
17 40.00 42.50 0.51 159 2.05 2.10 5 267 266 58 68 100.9
48.21
18 42.50 45.00 0.49 157 1.98 2.00 5 264 264 59 68 101.1
47.18
19 45.00 47.50 0.45 157 1.82 1.80 4 262 268 59 67 101.0
45.21
20 47.50 50.00 0.41 157 1.67 1.70 4 264 262 61 67 103.7
43.16
21 50.00 52.50 0.45 157 1.83 1.80 4 264 262 61 68 100.8
45.21
22 52.50 55.00 0.40 157 1.63 1.70 4 266 264 61 68 101.4
42.63
23 55.00 57.50 0.42 158 1.70 1.70 4 267 269 62 69 101.1
43.72
24 57.50 60.00 0.40 157 1.63 1.60 4 268 269 62 71 100.3 42.63
Final DGM:
Max
Vac %ISO BWS
60.0 min 47.295 ft3 0.46 in. WC 67.8 °F 157.5 °F 7 1.888 in. WC 93.2 0.166
68
65
1004.965
1007.020
1001.035
1009.045
991.180
998.975
1003.110
997.055
995.080
993.200 65
1010.990
1012.900
974.980
67
66
67
1018.570
1016.690
Pump
Vac
(in. Hg)
STACK DATA (FINAL)
4.095
FILTER NO.
Mid-Point Leak Check Vol (cf):
69
% ISO
68
Vs
(fps)
Orifice Press.
ΔH
(in. WC)
Gas Temperatures (°F)
65
Gas Temperatures (°F)
Pr702-9
1.922
glass
Pr702-9
65
67
67
66
66
MPC-Tesoro - Salt Lake City Refinery
10/24/23 Run 3
STACK DATA (EST)
MB706
Nozzle ID:
Nozzle Dn (in.):
Sa
m
p
l
e

Pt
.
Sample Time
(minutes)
Dry Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)--
0.285
EQUIPMENT
Meter Box ID:
Y:
ΔH @ (in.WC):
Probe ID:
Liner Material:
Pitot ID:
Pitot Cp/Type:
1
DGM Average
Amb.
Pitot
Tube
ΔP
(in WC)
15:26
K-FACTOR
MOIST. DATA
Vlc (ml)
172.2
FCCU Wet Gas Scrubber
16735-C
STACK DATA (EST)
Parameter:
14:12
973.100
986.820
984.710
980.660
982.665
978.820
989.030
976.795
1014.845
1.2
ΔHVm YqaΔPTmTs
68
68
71
70
71
71
71
RE
S
U
L
T
S
Run Time
70
68
69
1020.395
26 of 84

Appendix C

27 of 84
Version No. LT 2020-00_20.0
Project No. AST-2023-2130
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Analytical Services
5530 Marshall St.
Arvada, CO 80002
[phone]
www.alliancetg.com
Analytical Laboratory Report
474 West 900 North
Salt Lake City, UT 84103
Marathon Petroleum (Salt Lake City Refinery) - Tesoro
1 of 21
28 of 84
Quality Associate
Date
Certification Statement
Alliance Source Testing, LLC (AST) has completed the analysis as described in this report. Results
apply only to the source(s) tested and operating condition(s) for the specific test date(s) and
time(s) identified within this report. All results are intended to be considered in their entirety,
and AST is not responsible for use of less than the complete test report without written consent.
This report shall not be reproduced in full or in part without written approval from the customer.
To the best of my knowledge and abilities, all information, facts and test data are correct.
Data presented in this report has been checked for completeness and is accurate, error-free
and legible. Any deviations or problems are detailed in the relevant sections on the test report.
This document was prepared in portable document format (.pdf) and contains pages as
identified in the bottom footer of this document.
Validation Signature
The analytical data and all QC contained within this report was reviewed and validated by the
following individual.
James Davidson
2 of 21
Digitally signed by James Davidson
DN: C=US, CN=James Davidson, E=[e-mail]
Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Location: your signing location here
Date: 2023.11.22 17:00:40-06'00'
Foxit PDF Editor Version: 11.2.7
James Davidson
29 of 84
Project Narrative
Analytical Method(s):Method 5 - Determination of Particulate Matter Emissions From Stationary Sources
Method 202 - Dry Impinger Method for Determining Condensable Particulate Matter
Emissions From Stationary Sources
Filterable The filter(s) were either oven dried and/or desiccated per the method until a final
weight was obtained. The liquid fractions were extracted if required, evaporated and
cooled until a final weight was obtained. These fractions were summed together to
provide the total Particulate Matter collected.
Condensable The filter(s) were extracted per the method. The organic extract was added to the
organic rinse, and the inorganic extract was added to the inorganic rinse. The
inorganic fraction was extracted with solvent per the method. Extracts were
combined with the organic rinse. The organic and inorganic fractions were
evaporated and desiccated until a final weight was obtained.
MDL The Minimum Detection Level (MDL) is 0.5 mg per fraction. If the measured result for a
fraction is less than the MDL, the MDL was used in ensuing calculations.
Blank Correction If blank correction is performed, only blank values returned higher than the MDL are
used. If a blank returns a value less than the MDL, no correction is included.
Custody:The samples were received by Cory Manshack on 11/8/2023 in Arvada, CO. The
samples were received in good condition with proper Chain-of-Custody
documentation. No apparent container problems were noted upon receipt. Prior to
analysis, the samples were kept secure with access limited to authorized personnel of
AST.
Number of Samples:23 (2 on Hold)
Labeling: Acceptable
Analyst:Eric Grosjean - Laboratory Manager
Cory Manshack-Laboratory Analyst II
Ryan Gillett-Laboratory Analyst II
Carson Williamson-Laboratory Analyst I
Equipment:Mettler Toledo Balance ML-104, SN B217893065. This scale was used for analytical
determinations of filters and rinse vessels.
Denver Instruments Balance TB-6201, SN 17904189. This scale was used to measure the
total mass of rinse collected for blank correction.
Analysis was performed on the same balance as the associated tare.
Quincy Lab Inc oven, 30CG, SN G3-012673.
Lab Reagents:Acetone Lot Number: 216612
Hexane Lot Number: 224521
QC Notes:The samples met the minimum criteria established by the relevant method.
A blank correction was applied per the method.
Reporting Notes:none
3 of 21
30 of 84
Client
City, State
Project No.
Method
Lab ID
Field ID
Filter ID 16729 - C 16937 - C 16735 - C
Filter Tare Weight, g
Date - Desiccator
Time - Desiccator
Date of Weighing 11/7/23 11/8/23 11/7/23 11/8/23 11/7/23 11/8/23
Time of Weighing 14:37 8:46 14:37 8:46 14:37 8:46
Filter Weight, g 0.4883 0.4887 0.5171 0.5174 0.4871 0.4871
Filter PM Mass, mg*
Lab ID
Field ID
Beaker ID
Beaker tare, g
Beaker with Acetone, g
Acetone Mass, g
Date - Desiccator
Time - Desiccator
Date of Weighing 11/10/23 11/13/23 11/10/23 11/13/23 11/10/23 11/13/23
Time of Weighing 12:50 8:17 12:50 8:17 12:50 8:17
Weight, g 3.9826 3.9826 4.0044 4.0047 3.9379 3.9379
Measured Rinse Mass, mg
Blank Corrected
Total PM Mass, mg
*All fractions were analyzed and returned values greater than the MDL of 0.5 mg.
D38238
M5/202-WGS-Run 1 Cont. 1 M5/202-WGS-Run 2 Cont. 1 M5/202-WGS-Run 3 Cont. 1
D38228 D38233
Marathon Petroleum (Salt Lake City Refinery) - Tesoro
Salt Lake City, UT 84103
AST-2023-2130
EPA Method 5
Front Half Filter
13:45 13:45 13:45
11/6/23 11/6/23 11/6/23
5.2 3.7 4.5
Front Half Rinse
M5/202-WGS-Run 1 Cont. 2 M5/202-WGS-Run 2 Cont. 2 M5/202-WGS-Run 3 Cont. 2
32382 32391 32402
D38229 D38234 D38239
3.9676 3.9967 3.9355
109.7 78.3 70.4
105.7 74.3 66.5
11/9/23 11/9/23 11/9/23
12:30
15.0 7.9 2.4
20.2 11.7 6.9
0.4834 0.5135 0.4826
No
12:30 12:30
4 of 21
31 of 84
Client
City, State
Project No.
Method
Lab ID
Field ID
Beaker ID
Beaker tare, g
Beaker with Acetone, g
Acetone Mass, g
Date - Desiccator
Time - Desiccator
Date of Weighing 11/13/23 11/14/23
Time of Weighing 14:32 4:43
Weight, g 3.9401 3.9400
Blank Mass, mg*
Salt Lake City, UT 84103
Marathon Petroleum (Salt Lake City Refinery) - Tesoro
157.74
M5 Acetone Blank
32405
3.9397
D38248
Acetone Blank
EPA Method 5
AST-2023-2130
0.0
12:30
153.80
11/9/23
5 of 21
32 of 84
Client
City, State
Project No.
Method
Lab ID
Field ID
Lab ID
Field ID
Beaker ID
Beaker tare, g
Beaker Solvent, g
Solvent Mass, g
Date - Desiccator
Time - Desiccator
Date of Weighing 11/10/23 11/13/23 11/10/23 11/13/23 11/10/23 11/13/23
Time of Weighing 14:26 8:10 14:26 8:10 14:26 8:10
Weight, g 4.0036 4.0038 4.0492 4.0492 3.8616 3.8619
Measured Organic Mass, mg
Lab ID
Field ID
Beaker ID
Beaker tare, g
Beaker Water, g
Water Mass, g
Date - Desiccator
Time - Desiccator
Date of Weighing 11/10/23 11/13/23 11/10/23 11/13/23 11/10/23 11/13/23
Time of Weighing 13:31 8:00 13:31 8:00 13:31 8:00
Weight, g 49.8781 49.8784 49.9986 49.9984 50.8284 50.8285
Inorganic Mass, mg*
Blank Corrected
Total PM Mass, mg
*All fractions were analyzed and returned values greater than the MDL of 0.5 mg.
328.3 376.8 328.6
D38241
M5/202-WGS-Run 1 Cont. 4 M5/202-WGS-Run 2 Cont. 4 M5/202-WGS-Run 3 Cont. 4
31596 31598
49.8744 49.9935 50.8254
426.8378.2 379.4
D38231 D38236
11/9/23 11/9/23 11/9/23
12:30 12:30 12:30
5.0 3.1
Yes
195.1 166.1 75.9
31595
5.7 4.2 1.9
191.1 162.1 72.0
Teflon Filter
Organic Fraction
Marathon Petroleum (Salt Lake City Refinery) - Tesoro
11/9/23 11/9/23 11/9/23
13:29 13:29 13:29
3.9
D38230 D38235 D38240
M5/202-WGS-Run 1 Cont. 3 M5/202-WGS-Run 2 Cont. 3 M5/202-WGS-Run 3 Cont. 3
Salt Lake City, UT 84103
AST-2023-2130
EPA Method 202
Inorganic Fraction
3.9981 4.0450 3.8599
M5/202-WGS-Run 1 Cont. 5 M5/202-WGS-Run 2 Cont. 5 M5/202-WGS-Run 3 Cont. 5
32394 32482 32480
D38242D38237D38232
7.5 7.2 3.0
6 of 21
33 of 84
Client
City, State
Project No.
Method
Lab ID
Field ID
Lab ID
Field ID
Beaker ID
Beaker tare, g
Beaker Solvent, g
Solvent Mass, g
Date - Desiccator
Time - Desiccator
Date of Weighing 11/10/23 11/13/23 11/10/23 11/13/23
Time of Weighing 14:26 8:10 12:50 8:17
Weight, g 3.9407 3.9408 3.9446 3.9446
Organic Mass, mg*
Lab ID
Field ID
Beaker ID
Beaker tare, g
Beaker Water g
Water Mass, g
Date - Desiccator
Time - Desiccator
Date of Weighing 11/10/23 11/13/23 11/10/23 11/13/23
Time of Weighing 14:26 8:00 14:26 8:00
Weight, g 50.8643 50.8641 51.2866 51.2862
Inorganic Mass, mg*
Marathon Petroleum (Salt Lake City Refinery) - Tesoro
Salt Lake City, UT 84103
AST-2023-2130
EPA Method 202
116.8 100.1
3.9387
M202-FT Proof Recovery Blank Cont. 3 N/A
Field Train Blank
Field Train Blank Proof Blank
D38245 N/A
Teflon Filter Blanks
D38244
32400 32401
M202-FT Proof Recovery Blank Cont. 5 M202-FT Proof Blank-Cont. 5
D38247
Field Train Blank Proof Blank
3.9426
11/9/23 11/9/23
2.02.0
120.7
Organic Fraction Blanks
M202-FT Proof Recovery Blank Cont. 4 M202-FT Proof Blank-Cont. 4
D38246
Inorganic Fraction Blanks
11/9/23
283.5 164.0
Proof Blank
14:23 12:30
104.0
D38243
31599
50.8620 51.2851
31594
334.4 215.3
14:23 14:23
11/9/23
2.0 1.4
7 of 21
34 of 84
8 of 21
35

o
f

8
4
9 of 21
36 of 84
10 of 21
37 of 84
11 of 21
38 of 84
12 of 21
39 of 84
13 of 21
40 of 84
14 of 21
41 of 84
15 of 21
42 of 84
16 of 21
43 of 84
17 of 21
44 of 84
18 of 21
45 of 84
19 of 21
46 of 84
20 of 21
47 of 84
21 of 21
48 of 84
49 of 84
50 of 84
51 of 84
52 of 84
53 of 84
54 of 84
55 of 84
56 of 84
57 of 84
58 of 84
59 of 84
60 of 84
61 of 84
62 of 84
63 of 84
64 of 84
65 of 84
66 of 84
67 of 84
68 of 84
69 of 84
70 of 84
71 of 84
72 of 84
73 of 84
74 of 84
75 of 84

Appendix D

76 of 84
Method 3/3A Data
Location
Source
Project No.
Date/Time 10/24/23 13:45 Date/Time 10/24/23 13:45
Make/Model/SN Servomex 1440D 14150/3279 Servomex 1440D 14200/3279
Parameter Cylinder ID
Cylinder
Concentration, %
Analyzer
Concentration, %Cylinder ID Cylinder
Concentration, %
Analyzer
Concentration, %
Zero Gas 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
High Range Gas EB0078994 24.00 23.80 EB0078994 23.90 23.90
Mid Range Gas RR04251 10.99 11.10 RR04251 11.10 11.10
Concentration Span, %
Required Accuracy, %
Run No.
Analysis Date/Time 10/24/2023 16:45 10/24/2023 17:15 10/24/2023 17:45
Parameter O2 %CO2 %O2 %CO2 %O2 %CO2 %
Analysis #1 5.10 14.80 5.30 14.80 4.90 14.90
Analysis #2 5.10 14.80 5.30 14.70 4.90 14.90
Analysis #3 5.10 14.80 5.30 14.70 4.90 14.90
Average 5.1 14.8 5.3 14.7 4.9 14.9
The remaining consistuent is assumed to be nitrogen.
Run 1 Run 2 Run 3
MPC-Tesoro - Salt Lake City Refinery
FCCU Wet Gas Scrubber
AST-2023-2130
0.48 0.48
24.0
O2 Data CO2 Data
23.9
77 of 84
Balance
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71107
800-551-8150
Accreditation #62754 PGVP Vendor ID # G12021
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:EB0078994 Certification Date:04/29/2021
Product ID Number:127907 Expiration Date:04/27/2029
Cylinder Pressure:1900 PSIG MFG Facility: - Shreveport - LA
COA #EB0078994.20210414-0 Lot Number:EB0078994.20210414
Customer PO. NO.:Tracking Number:084269913
Customer:Previous Certification Dates:
This calibration standard has been certified per the May 2012 EPA Traceability Protocol, Document EPA-600/R-12/531,
using procedure G2.
Do Not Use This Cylinder Below 100 psig (0.7 Megapascal).
Certified Concentration(s)
Component Concentration Uncertainty Analytical Principle Assayed On
Carbon Dioxide 23.9 %±0.16 %NDIR 04/29/2021
Oxygen 24.0 %±0.13 %MPA 04/27/2021
Nitrogen
Analytical Measurement Data Available Online.
Reference Standard(s)
Serial Number Lot Expiration Type Balance Component Concentration Uncertainty(%)NIST Reference
CC729793 CC729793.20201022 04/06/2029 GMIS N2 O2 20.01 %0.115 SRM 2659a
EB0007615 EB0007615.20190610 11/24/2027 GMIS N2 CO2 24.71 %0.274 C1579010.02
EB0041474 EB0041474.20180504 07/21/2026 GMIS N2 O2 24 %0.497 071001
EB0097757 EB0097757.20190610 11/24/2027 GMIS N2 CO2 19.58 %0.306 C1579010.02
Analytical Instrumentation SMART-CERT
Component Principle Make MPC Date
O2 MPA Thermo 04/20/2021
CO2 NDIR Thermo 04/09/2021
Serial
1162980025
1162980025
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifications. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the International System of Units (SI). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confidence level of the measurement, unless otherwise noted. This calibration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Services. If not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
Anthony Cyr
Assistant Operations Manager
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Version 02-J, Revised on 2018-09-17
Model
410i
410i
78 of 84
Balance
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71107
800-551-8150
Accreditation #62754 PGVP Vendor ID # G12023
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:RR04251 Certification Date:09/21/2023
Product ID Number:125371 Expiration Date:09/19/2031
Cylinder Pressure:1900 PSIG MFG Facility: - Shreveport - LA
COA #RR04251.20230831-0 Lot Number:RR04251.20230831
Customer PO. NO.:Tracking Number:107549718
Customer:Previous Certification Dates:
This calibration standard has been certified per the May 2012 EPA Traceability Protocol, Document EPA-600/R-12/531,
using procedure G1.
Do Not Use This Cylinder Below 100 psig (0.7 Megapascal).
Certified Concentration(s)
Component Concentration Uncertainty Analytical Principle Assayed On
Carbon Dioxide 11.1 %±0.11 %FTIR 09/21/2023
Oxygen 10.99 %±0.03 %MPA 09/18/2023
Nitrogen
Analytical Measurement Data Available Online.
Reference Standard(s)
Serial Number Lot Expiration Type Balance Component Concentration Uncertainty(%)NIST Reference
CC737012 CC737012.20230228 07/09/2031 GMIS N2 O2 20 %0.112 SRM 2659a
EB0022021 EB0022021.20180323 07/15/2026 GMIS N2 CO2 14.9 %0.777 101001
Analytical Instrumentation SMART-CERT
Component Principle Make MPC Date
O2 MPA Thermo 09/18/2023
CO2 FTIR MKS 09/21/2023
Serial
1162980025
017146467
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifications. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the International System of Units (SI). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confidence level of the measurement, unless otherwise noted. This calibration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Services. If not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
Jasmine Godfrey
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Version 02-J, Revised on 2018-09-17
Model
410i
MKS 2031DJG2EKVS13T
79 of 84
QA/QC Data
Location
Source
Project No.
Parameter
#1 #2 #3 Dn (Average)Difference
10/24/23 SS282 0.285 0.284 0.285 0.285 0.001 SS
10/24/23 Pr710-9 no no no
Date Probe or
Thermocouple ID
Reference
Temp. (°F)
Indicated
Temp. (°F)Difference Criteria Probe Length
10/24/23 Pr710-9 68.4 68.2 0.0%10 '
Date 10/24/23
Balance ID:B304743079
Certified Weight ID:SLC-1KG-2
Certified Weight (g):1000.0
Measured Weight (g):1000.0
Weight Difference (g):0.0 ----------
10/24/23 Weather Station No Yes No
10/24/23 MB706
Acetone 216543 No NA NA NA
Hexane 218359 No NA NA NA
DI H2O 230440 No NA NA NA
Flow Rate (lpm):14 Flow Rate (lpm):14 Flow Rate (lpm):14
Clock Time Temperature Clock Time Temperature Clock Time Temperature
11:30 75.0 13:45 75.0 15:45 76.0
11:40 75.0 13:55 75.0 15:55 76.0
11:50 75.0 14:05 75.0 16:05 76.0
12:00 75.0 14:15 75.0 16:15 76.0
12:10 75.0 14:25 75.0 16:25 76.0
± 1.5 % (absolute)
Reagent ByDateField LotField Prep
performedLot#
Date Barometric
Pressure
Evidence of
damage?Reading Verified Calibration or
Repair required?
Posttest Purge
Run 1 Run 2 Run 3
Material
Date Meter Box ID Positive Pressure Leak Check
Pass
≤ 0.004 in.
Date Pitot ID
Evidence of
damage?
Weather Station Location
Salt Lake City UT
Evidence of
mis-alignment?
Calibration or
Repair required?
Field Balance Check
MPC-Tesoro - Salt Lake City Refinery
FCCU Wet Gas Scrubber
AST-2023-2130
Nozzle Diameter (in.)
Date Nozzle ID Criteria
PM
80 of 84
Document ID 620.004
Revision 22.3
Effective Date 12/16/22
Issuing Department Page 1 of 1
Console ID:
Meter S/N:
Critical Orifice S/N:
(PbI)
(PbF)
(Pb)
(Y)1330-31 1330-31 1330-25 1330-25 1330-19 1330-19
(K')0.8429 0.8429 0.6728 0.673 0.5186 0.519
(VP)15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 17.0 17.0
Initial DGM Volume, ft3 (VmI)423.941 434.737 449.922 458.683 474.495 481.430
Final DGM Volume, ft3 (VmF)434.837 445.698 458.683 467.443 481.430 488.317
Total DGM Volume, ft3 (Vm)10.896 10.961 8.761 8.760 6.935 6.887
Ambient Temperature, °F (Ta)83 84 84 84 85 86
Initial DGM Temperature, °F (TmI)81 81 82 83 84 85
Final DGM Temperature, °F (TmF)81 82 83 84 85 85
Average DGM Temperature, °F ( Tm)81 82 83 84 85 85
Elapsed Time (Θ)10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Meter Orifice Pressure, in. WC (ΔH)3.30 3.30 2.20 2.20 1.40 1.40
Standard Meter volume, ft3 (Vmstd)9.1653 9.2114 7.3259 7.3116 5.7645 5.7194
Standard Critical Orifice Volume, ft3 (Vcr)9.2410 9.2325 7.3694 7.3694 5.6752 5.670
Meter Correction Factor (Y)1.008 1.002 1.006 1.008 0.985 0.991
Tolerance --0.008 0.002 0.006 0.008 0.016 0.009
Orifice Calibration Value (ΔH @)1.828 1.830 1.905 1.902 2.032 2.034
Tolerance --0.094 0.092 0.017 0.020 0.110 0.112
Orifice Cal Check --
Meter Correction Factor (Y)
Orifice Calibration Value (ΔH @)
Accuracy Difference
oF oR oF oR %oF
0 460 0 460 0.0 0
68 528 66 526 0.4 2
100 560 98 558 0.4 2
223 683 223 683 0.0 0
248 708 248 708 0.0 0
273 733 273 733 0.0 0
300 760 300 760 0.0 0
400 860 398 858 0.2 2
500 960 498 958 0.2 2
600 1,060 599 1,059 0.1 1
700 1,160 701 1,161 -0.1 1
800 1,260 801 1,261 -0.1 1
900 1,360 901 1,361 -0.1 1
1,000 1,460 1,002 1,462 -0.1 2
1,100 1,560 1,102 1,562 -0.1 2
1,200 1,660 1,202 1,662 -0.1 2
Calibration Date:
Amos OmerCalibration By:
9/7/2023
Equipment Detail - Thermocouple Sensor
Reference Temp.Display Temp.
OMEGA
T-197207
Personnel
Reference Calibrator Make:
Reference Calibrator Model:
Reference Calibrator S/N:
Calibration Detail
K' Factor, ft3·R1/2 / in. WC·min
CL23A
Vacuum Pressure, in. Hg
Initial Barometric Pressure, in. Hg
Final Barometric Pressure, in. Hg
Average Barometric Pressure, in. Hg
Critifcal Orifice ID
Calibration Detail
MB-706
283355
1330
Positive Pressure Leak Check
Equipment Detail - Dry Gas Meter
1.000
1.922
Yes
1.76 1.92 1.89
DGM Calibration-Orifices
Tech Services
25.54
25.54
25.54
81 of 84

Appendix E

82 of 84
Start Time Finish Time FCU FRESH FEED TO RX
F100202.pv
BPD
Run #1 10/24/23 9:45 AM 10/24/23 10:55 AM 29101
Run #2 10/24/23 12:00 PM 10/24/23 1:20 PM 29,097
Run #3 10/24/23 2:12 PM 10/24/23 3:26 PM 29,103
AVERAGE:29,100
FCU FRESH FEED TO RX
83 of 84
Last Page of Report
84 of 84
Source Information
Division of Air Quality
Compliance Demonstration
Source Information
Company Name Tesouro - FCCU WGS
Company Contact:Morgan Sites
Contact Phone No.385-306-4615
Source Designation:FCCU WGS
Test & Review Dates
Test Date: 10/24/2023
Review Date: 1/12/2024 Tabs Are Shown
Observer:
Reviewer:Paul Morris
Particulate Emission Limits
ton/yr lbs/hr gr/dscf
- - -
Emission Rates - "Front Half"
ton/yr lbs/hr gr/dscf
0.6528 0.0009
Test Information
Stack_I.D._inches As ft^2 Y Dl H @ Cp Pbar Pq (static)Dn
96.00 50.27 1.0000 1.922 0.84 25.6 -0.01 0.285
Contractor Information
Contracting Company: Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Contact: Shamit Nakra
Phone No.: 385-252-7553
Project No.:
Circular
10100
9780
9860
9190
8710
8710
8710
10540
10640
11950
320
10610
10200
10390
1970
1800
1910
1420
1040
1190
1250
F factor usedF factors for Coal, Oil, and Gas
Anthrocite 2
Lignite
Natural
Propane
Butane
COAL
OIL
GAS
Bituminous 2
Fd Fw Fc
scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu
O2
CO2
lbs/MMBtu
Page 1
Summary
Division of Air Quality
Reference Methods 5 - TSP
Compliance Demonstration of
Tesouro - FCCU WGS
Testing Results Lab Data - grams collected
Test Date 10/24/2023 10/24/2023 10/24/2023 10/24/2023 Lab Data Probe Filter Back
Circular Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Run 1 0.015 0.0052 0.0075 22.9%
As ft^2 50.27 50.27 50.27 Run 2 0.0079 0.0037 0.0072 15.7%
Pbar 25.60 25.60 25.60 Run 3 0.0024 0.0045 0.003 23.3%
Pq (static)-0.01 -0.01 -0.01 Run 4
Ps 25.60 25.60 25.60
Avg. Ts F 145.00 147.83 157.54 Front Half Emissions Summary
CO2 - FCO2 14.80 14.70 14.90 Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Avg.
O2 5.10 5.30 4.90 gr./dscf 0.0016 0.0006 0.0006 0.00093
N2+C 80.10 80.00 80.20 lbs/hr 1.0917 0.4376 0.4292 0.65
Md 30.57 30.56 30.58 ton/yr 4.78 1.92 1.88 2.86
Ms 27.29 27.77 28.50
Y 1.00 1.00 1.00
Cp 0.84 0.84 0.84 Total Emissions Summary w/back half condensable
Vm cf 52.27 53.69 47.30 Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Avg.
Vlc 402.90 282.00 172.20 gr./dscf 0.0042 0.0030 0.0017 0.0030
AVG. Tm F 67.79 66.69 63.94 lbs/hr 2.8617 2.1676 1.2301 2.0865
Vm std 45.03 46.36 40.98 ton/yr 12.53 9.49 5.39 9.14
Vw std 18.96 13.27 8.11
Bws 0.30 0.22 0.17
S Bws 0.26 0.28 0.36
Avg. Sqrt
Dlp 0.72 0.73 0.68
Vs 48.28 48.32 44.90 F factor used
scfm wet 108737.25 108308.66 99057.79
acfm 145623.97 145729.30 135411.03
Qsd dscfh 4819211.07 5052071.26 4962120.93
# Sample
Points 24.00 24.00 24.00
Dn 0.285 0.285 0.285
An 4.43E-04 4.43E-04 4.43E-04
Start Time 0:00 0:00 0:00
End Time 0:00 0:00 0:00
Total Test
time 60.00 60.00 60.00
Time @ point 2.50 2.50 2.50
Fraction PM 10
80.00
90.00
100.00
110.00
120.00
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47
%
I
s
o
k
i
n
e
t
i
c
Points
Run 1 PxP Isokinetic
80.00
90.00
100.00
110.00
120.00
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47
%
I
s
o
k
i
n
e
t
i
c
Sample Points
Run 2 PxP Isokinetic
80.00
90.00
100.00
110.00
120.00
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47
%
I
s
o
k
i
n
e
t
i
c
Sample Points
Run 3 PxP Isokinetic
O2
CO2
lbs/MMBtu
80.00
90.00
100.00
110.00
120.00
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47
Sample Points
Run 4 PxP Isokinetic
Page 1
Run 1
Tesouro - FCCU WGS Flow & Moisture Test Date 10/24/2023
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg. Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
50.27 25.60 -0.01 25.60 145 14.80 5.10 80.10 30.57 27.29
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc Avg. Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 0.2613
1.0000 0.84 52.267 402.90 67.79 45.027 18.965 0.2964 0.2613 0.999
Avg. Sqrt
Dlp Vs scfm wet acfm Qsd dscfh
# Sample
Points Dn
Total Test
time (minutes)
Time @ point
(minutes)Avg. Dlh
0.722 48.28 108,737 145,624 4.82E+06 24 0.285 60 2.50 2.387500
TRUE
Point No.Meter (cf) dl "p" dl "h" ts F tm F (in) tm F (out) Imp. Liquid Collected
1 862.806 0.70 3.10 141 49 63 Wt. (Final) Wt. (Initial) lc
2 865.320 0.55 2.40 144 63 73 883.00 497.00 386.0
3 867.510 0.50 2.20 146 63 74 634.50 631.40 3.1
4 869.625 0.51 2.30 145 59 74 700.80 699.50 1.3
5 871.775 0.49 2.20 145 57 76 949.20 936.70 12.5
6 873.885 0.46 2.10 146 55 77 0.0
7 875.920 0.41 1.80 146 53 76
8 877.825 0.44 2.00 146 55 77 Isokinetics 111.3
9 879.815 0.37 1.70 146 55 78 Test Date 10/24/2023
10 881.645 0.38 1.70 145 51 79 Start Time enter
11 883.500 0.39 1.80 144 54 78 End Time
12 885.380 0.40 1.80 143 54 74 Run 1
13 887.274 0.65 2.90 145 64 81
14 889.690 0.57 2.60 145 64 80
15 891.995 0.55 2.50 145 67 81
16 894.250 0.67 3.00 146 67 81
17 896.720 0.90 4.00 146 59 79
18 899.520 0.81 3.70 144 58 75
19 902.285 0.55 2.50 145 59 73
20 904.555 0.57 2.60 146 59 78
21 906.845 0.49 2.20 145 59 77
22 908.975 0.50 2.30 146 61 80
23 911.120 0.46 2.10 145 61 81
24 913.170 0.39 1.80 145 62 81
25 915.073
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Page 1
Run 2
Tesouro - FCCU WGS Flow & Moisture Test Date 10/24/2023
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg. Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
50.27 25.60 -0.01 25.60 148 14.70 5.30 80.00 30.56 27.77
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc Avg. Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 0.2806
1.0000 0.84 53.688 282.00 67 46.362 13.274 0.2226 0.2806 0.999
Avg. Sqrt
Dlp Vs scfm wet acfm Qsd dscfh
# Sample
Points Dn
Total Test
time (minutes)
Time @ point
(minutes)Avg. Dlh
0.728 48.32 108,309 145,729 5.05E+06 24 0.285 60 2.50 2.49
TRUE
Point No.Meter (cf) dl "p" dl "h" ts F tm F (in) tm F (out) Imp. Liquid Collected
1 918.975 0.77 3.50 145.0 61.0 65.0 Wt. (Final) Wt. (Initial) lc
2 921.635 0.81 3.70 145.0 60.0 65.0 1019.50 762.10 257.4
3 924.375 0.71 3.20 146.0 58.0 66.0 648.10 640.10 8.0
4 926.935 0.48 3.10 145.0 59.0 66.0 642.10 640.00 2.1
5 929.080 0.45 2.10 145.0 59.0 66.0 976.20 961.70 14.5
6 931.140 0.68 3.10 145.0 60.0 68.0 0.0
7 933.700 0.65 3.00 145.0 62.0 68.0
8 936.210 0.58 2.60 145.0 62.0 68.0 Isokinetics 104.2
9 938.570 0.56 2.60 144.0 63.0 69.0 Test Date 10/24/2023
10 940.865 0.61 2.80 144.0 63.0 70.0 Start Time
11 943.255 0.60 2.80 145.0 65.0 71.0 End Time
12 945.635 0.62 2.80 145.0 65.0 72.0 Run 2
13 948.065 0.48 2.20 144.0 66.0 70.0
14 950.190 0.40 1.80 151.0 66.0 74.0
15 952.125 0.43 2.00 151.0 64.0 74.0
16 954.145 0.44 2.00 151.0 64.0 75.0
17 956.155 0.45 2.00 150.0 63.0 77.0
18 958.220 0.41 1.90 152.0 66.0 77.0
19 960.175 0.39 1.80 152.0 66.0 77.0
20 962.120 0.36 1.60 152.0 61.0 72.0
21 963.960 0.40 1.90 152.0 60.0 72.0
22 965.895 0.54 2.50 151.0 61.0 72.0
23 968.200 0.55 2.50 151.0 62.0 73.0
24 970.510 0.50 2.30 152.0 63.0 75.0
25 972.663
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Page 1
Run 3
Tesouro - FCCU WGS Flow & Moisture Test Date 10/24/2023
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg. Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
50.27 25.60 -0.01 25.60 158 14.90 4.90 80.20 30.58 28.50
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc Avg. Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 0.3559
1.0000 0.84 47.295 172.20 64 40.985 8.105 0.1651 0.3559 0.999
Avg. Sqrt
Dlp Vs scfm wet acfm Qsd dscfh
# Sample
Points Dn
Total Test
time (minutes)
Time @ point
(minutes)Avg. Dlh
0.680 44.90 99,058 135,411 4.96E+06 24 0.285 60 2.50 1.89
TRUE
Point No.Meter (cf) dl "p" dl "h" ts F tm F (in) tm F (out) Imp. Liquid Collected
1 973.100 0.42 1.90 162.0 58.0 66 Wt. (Final) Wt. (Initial) lc
2 974.980 0.40 1.60 165.0 59.0 66 909.5 753.3 156.2
3 976.795 0.46 1.80 163.0 59.0 67 631.7 631.4 0.3
4 978.820 0.41 1.70 159.0 60.0 68 703.0 700.8 2.2
5 980.660 0.48 1.90 159.0 60.0 67 952.0 938.5 13.5
6 982.665 0.51 2.10 156.0 61.0 68 0.0
7 984.710 0.54 2.20 157.0 61.0 68
8 986.820 0.59 2.40 156.0 62.0 69 Isokinetics 93.8
9 989.030 0.56 2.30 155.0 62.0 66 Test Date 10/24/2023
10 991.180 0.49 2.00 156.0 62.0 67 Start Time
11 993.200 0.43 1.70 156.0 62.0 67 End Time
12 995.080 0.46 1.90 152.0 63.0 68 Run 3
13 997.055 0.45 1.80 151.0 65.0 68
14 998.975 0.50 2.00 159.0 55.0 67
15 1001.035 0.49 2.00 158.0 56.0 67
16 1003.110 0.40 1.60 158.0 58.0 68
17 1004.965 0.51 2.10 159.0 58.0 68
18 1007.020 0.49 2.00 157.0 59.0 68
19 1009.045 0.45 1.80 157.0 59.0 67
20 1010.990 0.41 1.70 157.0 61.0 67
21 1012.900 0.45 1.80 157.0 61.0 68
22 1014.845 0.40 1.70 157.0 61.0 68
23 1016.690 0.42 1.70 158.0 62.0 69
24 1018.570 0.40 1.60 157.0 62.0 71
25 1020.395
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Page 1