DAQ-2024-004273

1

DAQC-041-24
Site ID 10123 (B4)

MEMORANDUM

TO: STACK TEST FILE – HOLLYFRONTIER WOODS CROSS REFINING, LLC

THROUGH: Harold Burge, Major Source Compliance Section Manager

FROM: Robert Sirrine, Environmental Scientist

DATE: January 12, 2024

SUBJECT: Source: Heater 8H2
Location: 1070 West 500 South, West Bountiful, Davis County, Utah
Contact: F. Travis Smith: [phone]
Tester: Alliance Technical Group, LLC, Charles Horton, 352-663-7568
FRS ID #: UT00000049011000013
AO #: DAQE-AN101230057-23, dated November 15, 2023
Action Code: Tr
Subject: Review of stack test report dated December 7, 2023

On December 7, 2023, Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) received a stack test emissions report for the
8H2 Heater located at the HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refinery located in West Bountiful, Davis County,
Utah. Testing was performed November 21, 2023, to determine compliance with the NOx emission limit
found in Condition II.B.6.b. The DAQ calculated results are:

Source Test Date RM/Pollutant DAQ Result Test Result Limit

8H2 11/21/23 7E/NOX 0.038 lb/MMBtu 0.038 lb/MMBtu 0.04 lb/MMBtu

DEVIATIONS: No deviations were noted.

CONCLUSION: The test report appears to be acceptable.

RECOMMENDATION: The determined NOX emissions of 0.038 lb/MMBtu should be
considered to have been in compliance with the applicable emission limit
at the time of testing.

HPV: No.

ATTACHMENTS: Stack test emissions report received December 7, 2023.
DAQ generated excel spreadsheets.

,,tttFsnctor
December 7,2023
Mr. Bryce Bird, Director
Division of Air Quality
Utah Dept. of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, Utah 841l6
RE: 8H2 NOx Performance Test Report
Dear Mr. Bird:
UTAH DEPARTMENT OF
ENV]RONMENTAL OUALITY
DEC - 1 ?i23
Hand Delivered
AXfnf kfWA-- *cr Du9.rh StrnrY,onds') u
Dustin Simmonds
Vice-President and Refinery Manager
c: E. Benson (r)File 2.4.4
HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining LLC
1070 W. 500 S, West Bountiful, UT 84087
801 -299-6600 | HFSinclair.com
Hqn / D* lr wftJ -.olvlsionr oF AIR QUALrrv
ln accordance with Utah Administrative Code R307-165,40 CFR 60.llZaband Conditions tr.B.l.a and tr.B.6.b
of Approval Order AN101230057-23, please find enclosed the results of our recent NOx emissions
performance testing for heater 8H2. The testing was conducted on November 2l't, 2023. Ahardand electronic
copy of the performance test results are included with this cover page.
The test result for NOx emissions was 0.038 lbA/tMBtu at an average excess oxygen concentration of 5.0%
volume wet. These results are in compliance with the limits set forth in 40 CFR 60.102a(g)(2XD@) of 0.040
lb&IMBtu. Ongoing compliance will be demonstrated by use of an Oz CEMS and a maximum excess oxygen
limit of 5.0% volume wet, as determined by this performance test.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact F. Travis Smith at [phone] or
email at [e-mail].
I certifu that:
Testing was conducted while the source was operating at the rate and/or conditions specified in the
applicable approval order, operating permit, or federal regulation;
During testing, the source combusted fuels, used raw materials, and maintained process conditions
representative ofnormal operations, and operated under such other relevant conditions specified by the
Director;
Based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements and information
contained in the report are true, accurate, and complete.
Sincerely,
UTAH DEPAETMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL OUAUW
1A! llare** oF A,R errAlnv
Source Test Report
HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC
1070 West 500 South
West Bountiful, UT 84087
Source Tested: Heater 8H2
Test Date: November 21,2023
Project No. AST-2023-4007
Prepared By
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley City, UT 84120
pdltfu
TECHNICAL GNOUP Source Teil Report
Test Program Sumrnary
Resulatorv Information
Permit No.
Source Information
DAQE-AN10t230057-23
Source Name
Refinery Gas Fired Process
Heater
Contact Information
Source ID
8H2
Target Parameter
NOx
Test Location
HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC
1070 West 500 South
West Bountiful, UT 84087
Eric Benson
[e-mail]
[phone]
F. Travis Smith
ft rav is. sm [e-mail]
(801) 29e-662s
Test Comparry
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W22705, SuiteE
West Valley City, UT 84120
Project Manager
Charles Horton
[e-mail]
(3s2) 663-7s68
Field Team Leader
Tobias Hubbard
[e-mail]
(605) 64s-8s62
QA/QC Manager
Kathleen Shonk
katie.shonk@al I iancetg.com
(812) 4s2-478s
Report Coordinator
Michael Meadows
[e-mail]
HF Sinclair - West Bountiful, UTAST-2023-4007
2 of44
Page i
pulfrirce
Source Tesl Repoil
Ce rl ili cal i on St a t ementTECI-1 NICAL GNOUP
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) has completed the source testing as described in this report Results apply
only to the source(s) tested and operating condition(s) for the specific test date(s) and time(s) identified within this
report. All results are intended to be considered in their entirety, and Alliance is not responsible for use of less than
the complete test report without written consent. This report shall not be reproduced in full or in part without written
approval from the customer.
To the best of my knowledge and abilities, all information, facts, and test data are correct. Data presented in this
report has been checked for completeness and is accurate, error-free, and legible. Onsite testing was conducted in
accordance with approved internal Standard Operating Procedures. Any deviations or problems are detailed in the
relevant sections in the test report.
This report is only considered valid once an authorized representative ofAlliance has signed in the space provided
below; any other version is considered draft. This document was prepared in portable document format (.pdf) and
contains pages as identified in the bottom footer ofthis document.
,r' :J-
l\
t2t4/2023
Charles Horton, QSTI
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Date
,ffi"fir,ffi^t'xJ^t'!"
DEC
^^^^' I L'-i-v
DIVISION OF AIR AUALITY
HF Sinclair - West Bountiful, UTAST-2023-4007
3 of44
Page ii
puahrpe
TEOHNICAL GNOUP Source Test Report
Table ofContents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
l.l Emission Unit and Control Unit Descriptions................. ....................'...... l-l
1.3 Site Specific Test Plan & Notification ......... l-l
3.1 U U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3,A - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide ......... 3- I
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E - Nitrogen Oxides........... ............... 3- l
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method l9- Mass Emission Factors........... .............'.'............ 3-l
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Gas Dilution System Certification... ...............'. 3-l
3.5 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3,{ and 78.............................3-2
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3-l: Source Testing Methodolor ......................3-l
APPENDICES
Appendix A Sample Calculations
Appendix B Field Data
Appendix C Quality Assurance/Quality Control Data
Appendix D Process Operating/Control System Data
HF Sinclair - West Bountiful, UTAST-2023-4007
4 of44
Page iii
5 of44
plltfrlpe
Source Tesl Report
InlroductionTECHNICAL GNOUP
1.0 Introduction
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining,LLC (HF Sinclair)
to conduct compliance testing at the Woods Cross refinery in West Bountiful, Utah. Portions of the facility are
subject to provisions of the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Air Quality (UDAQ) Permit
No. DAQE-AN101230057-23. Testing was conducted to determine the emission rate of nitrogen oxides (NOx) at
the exhaust of Heater 8H2.
1.1 Emission Unit and Control Unit Descriptions
1.2 Project Team
Personnel involved in this project are identified in the following table.
Teble l-l: Project Team
HF Sinclair Personnel F. Travis Smith
Alliance Personnel
Tobias Hubbard
Dillon Brown
l3 Site Specific Test Plan & Notification
Testing was conducted in accordance with the Site-Specific Test Plan (SSTP) submitted to UDAQ by HF Sinclair.
FIF Sinclair - West Bountiful. UT
Unit ID Process Descriotion Air Pollution Contrcls
8H2 Process Heater, 99 MMBtU/hr HHV, fired on plant gas.
Stack temoerature aooroximatelv 640 to 720oF.
Ultra-low NOx bumers
AST-2023-4007
6of44
Page l-l
7 of44
AnfuTECHNICAL GROUP Source Test Report
Sltt rgryo,f neyltt
2.0 Summery of Results
Alliance conducted compliance testing at the HF Sinclair Woods Cross refinery in West Bountiful, Utah on
November 21,2023. Testing consisted of determining the emission rate of NOx at the exhaust of Heater 8H2.
Table 2-l provides a summary of the ernission testing results with comparisons to the applicable UDAQ permit
limit. Any difference between the summary results listed in the following table and ttre detailed results contained in
appendices is due to rounding for presentation.
Teble 2-l: Summery of Rcsults
Concentration, ppmvd
Emission Factor, lb/Ir4MBtu
PermitLimit, lbA,IMBtu
Percent of Limit,Yo
AST-2023-4007
8 of44
Page2-lIIF Sinclair - West Bountifirl, UT
9 of44
pilt6rpe
TECF] NICAL GNOUP Source Tesl Report
Testing Methodologt
3.0 Testing Methodology
The emission testing program was conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3-1. Method
descriptions are provided below while quality assurance/quality control data is provided in Appendix C.
Table 3-1: Source Testing Methodology
3.1 U U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide
The oxygen (Oz) and carbon dioxide (COz) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test
Method 3,A. Data was collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system consisted of a
stainless-steel probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system and the identified gas analyzer. The gas
conditioning system was a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the stack gas. If an unheated Teflon
sample line was used, then a portable non-contact condenser was placed in the system directly after the probe.
Otherwise, a heated Teflon sample line was used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.5.
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E - Nitrogen Oxides
The nitrogen oxides (NOx) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E. Data
was collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system consisted ofa stainless-steel probe,
Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system and the identified gas analyzer. The gas conditioning system was a
non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the stack gas. If an unheated Teflon sample line was used, then
a portable non-contact condenser was placed in the system directly after the probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon
sample line was used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.5.
33 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 19 - Mass Emission Factors
The pollutant concentrations were converted to mass emission factors (lb/IvIMBtu) using procedures outlined in U.S.
EPA Reference Test Method 19. The calculated fuel factor (F-Factor) from a recent fuel gas analysis was used in the
calculations.
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Gas Dilution System Certification
A calibration gas dilution system field check was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Method 205.
Multiple dilution rates and total gas flow rates were utilized to force the dilution system to perform two dilutions on
each mass flow controller. The diluted calibration gtrses were sent directly to the analyzer, and the analyzer response
recorded in an electronic field data sheet. The analyzer response agreed within 2o/o of the actual diluted gas
concentration. A second Protocol I calibration gas, with a cylinder concentration within l0% of one of the gas
divider settings described above, was introduced directly to the analyzer, and the analyzer response recorded in an
electronic freld data sheet. The cylinder concentration and the analyzer response agreed within 2o/o. These steps were
repeated three (3) times. Copies of the Method 205 data can be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control
Appendix.
HF Sinclair - West Bountiful, UT
Oxygen / Carbon Dioxide
Mass Emission Factors
Gas Dilution System Certification
AST-2023-4007
l0 of44
Page 3-l
L \7
Source Test Reporl
7'esting Methodologt
3.5 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3A and 7E
Cylinder calibration gases used met EPA Protocol I (+l- 2%) standards. Copies of all calibration gas certificates can
be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix.
Low Level gas was introduced directly to the analyzer. After adjusting the analyzer to the Low-Level gas
concentration and once the analyzer reading was stable, the analyzer value was recorded. This process was repeated
for the High-Level gas. For the Calibration Error Test, Low, Mid, and High-Level calibration gases were
sequentially introduced directly to the analyzer. All values were within 2.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5
ppmv lo/o absolute difference.
High or Mid Level gas (whichever was closer to the stack gas concentration) was introduced at the probe and the
time required for the analyzer reading to reach 95 percent or 0.5 ppmv/Yo (whichever was less restrictive) of the gas
concentration was recorded. The analyzer reading was observed until it reached a stable value, and this value was
recorded. Next, Low-Level gas was introduced at the probe and the time required for the analyzer reading to
decrease to a value within 5.0 percent or 0.5 ppmv/% (whichever was less restrictive) was recorded. If the Low-
Level gas was zero gas, the response was 0.5 ppmvlYo or 5.0 percent of the upscale gas concentration (whichever
was less restrictive). The analyzer reading was observed until it reached a stable value, and this value was recorded.
The measurement system response time and initial system bias were determined from these data. The System Bias
was within 5.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/7o absolute difference.
High or Mid Level gas (whichever was closer to the stack gas concentration) was introduced at the probe. After the
analyzer response was stable, the value was recorded. Next, Low-Level gas was introduced at the probe, and the
analyzer value recorded once it reached a stable response. The System Bias was within 5.0 percent of the Calibration
Span or 0.5 ppmvl%o absolute difference or the data was invalidated, and the Calibration Error Test and System Bias
were repeated.
Drift between pre- and post-run System Bias was within 3 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/%o absolute
difference. If the drift exceeded 3 percent or 0.5 ppmv/%o, the Calibration Error Test and System Bias were repeated.
To determine the number of sampling points, a gas stratification check was conducted prior to initiating testing. The
pollutant concentrations were measured atthree points (16.7, 50.0 and 83.3 percent of the measurement line). Each
traverse point was sampled for a minimum of twice the system response time.
If the pollutant concentration at each traverse point did not differ more than 5 percent or 0.5 ppmv/0.3% (whichever
was less restrictive) ofthe average pollutant concentration, then single point sampling was conducted during the test
runs. If the pollutant concentration did not meet these specifications but differed less than l0 percent or 1.0
ppmv/0.5% from the average concentration, then ttree (3) point sampling was conducted (stacks less than 7.8 feet in
diameter - 16.7, 50.0 and 83.3 percent of the measurement line; stacks greater than 7.8 feet in diameter - 0.4, 1.0,
and 2.0 meters from the stack wall). If the pollutant concentration differed by more than l0 percent or 1.0
ppmv/0.5% from the average concentration, then sampling was conducted at a minimum of twelve (12) traverse
poinf. Copies of stratification check data can be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix.
An NOz - NO converter check was performed on the analyzer prior to initiating testing. An approximately 50 ppm
nitrogen dioxide cylinder gas was introduced directly to the NOx analyzer and the instrument response was recorded
in an electronic data sheet. The instrument response was within +/- l0 percent of the cylinder concentration.
AST-2023-4007 HF Sinclair - West Bountiful, UT Page3-2
pilt6rpe
TECHNICAL GROUP Source Test Reporl
Testing Methodologt
A Data Acquisition System with battery backup was used to record the instrument response in one (l) minute
averages. The data was continuously stored as a *.CSV file in Excel format on the hard drive of a computer. At the
completion of testing, the data was also saved to the Alliance server. All data was reviewed by the Field Team
Leader before leaving the facility. Once arriving at Alliance's office, all written and electronic data was relinquished
to the report coordinator and then a final review was performed by the Project Manager.
IIF Sinclair - West Bountiful, UTAST-2023-4007
12 of 44
Page 3-3
l3 of44
l
anl6rre.,i"LCHNICAL. (]ROUf)
Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining,LLC - West Bountiful, UT
Source Heater 8H2
Project No.: A.ST-20234047
Run No. /Method Run I / Method 3A
Oz - Outlet Concentration (Cd, % dry
Co: (C*,-Cor,. ({""-&;)
where,
C*"-_ 5$ : average analyzer value duringtest, % dry
Co 0.05 : average ofpretest & posttest zero responsgs,o/o dry
Cro_-!0.!!-= actual concentration of calibration gas,o/o dry
CM 10.95 = average ofpretest & posttest calibration responses, 06 dry
Co, 5,98 : Oz Concentratioryo/odry
14 of44
#AIiarrcE)
.,,';i
Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining,LLC - West Bountiful, UT
Source: Heater 8H2
Project No.: AST-20234007
Run No. /Method Run I / Method 7E
NOx - Outlet Concentration (Cxo,), ppmvd
cNo*: (co6,-cs)x (#t")
where,
C*,A: average analyzer value during test, ppmvd
Co 0.46 : average ofpretest & posttest zero responses, ppmvd
Cr,ae 49.91 : actual concentration of calibration gas, ppmvd
CM 49.15 : average ofpretest & posttest calibration responses, ppmvd
C*6T: Nox Concentration, ppmvd
NOx - Outlet Emission Factor (EFxo,o,o), lb/'lVIMBtu
EFNo*o,a: cNo*xKxFd- (-;53"+;)
where,
C** L: NOx - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
K 1.19482E-07 : constant, lb/dscf ' ppmvd
FdE: fuel factor, dscflMMBtu
Co, 5.98 : oxygen concentration, %o
EFNo*o,a 0.039 : lb/MMBtu
l5 of44
AaaffiiGEI
l.i:irli:i'.1"I { ii(-\iIi
efinire,Llc-w6tBountifur.ur
Source Heater 8H2
Projeca No. AST-2023-4007
Run No. I
P8rameter(s) Moisture
Example Calculations
Meter Pressure (Pm), in. Hg
AHPm = Pb*fS6
where,
?b 26.22 = baometric pressure, in. Hg
AH 1.000 = pressure differential oforifie, in H2O
Y^T=in.ug
Absolute Saack Gas Prosure (Ps), in. Hg
Psps = pb+#
where,
Pb 26.00 = baometric pressure, in. Hg
Pgg: staticpressure, in. H2O
Ps 26.01 = in. Hg
St.ndard Meter Volume (Vmstd), dscf
Vmstd =
l7.636xVmxPmxY
Y 0.970 = meter corrstion frctor
,.@=metervolume, cf
Pm 26.29 = absolute meter presure, in. Hg
r. T6- - absolute meter temperature, "R
v*rtd-l6.il=d."f
Standard !ffet Volume (Vwstd), rcl
Vstd= 0.04716xVlc
where,
Vlc 104.2 = wight of H2O collected, g
v*td.....ffi=r"f
Moisture Fraction (BWSsat), dimensionless (theoreaicol at soturrted conditions)
,Oo.:,-(fffi)
BlVSsat = -------;:-
where, rJ
T._:q9-= stack temperature, "F
Pr-219-=
"brclute
stack gs pressure, in. Hg
BWSsat 0.000 = dimmsionless
Moisture Fraction (BWS), dimensiotrl6s
Vwstd
(Vwstd * Vmstd)
where-
Vrctd 4.914 = stadrd ret volume, sf
Vmstd 30.341 = standad meter volme, dscf
BWS__1[!]!= dimensionles
Moisture Fraction (BWS), dimcnsionless
BWS = BWSmsd unless BWSsat < BWSmsd
where,
BWSer 0.000 = moisture fretion (theoretical at saturated conditions)
BWSmsd 0.139 = moisture frrction (meoured)
BWS 0.139
Tm
16 of 44
d3*ra
..i : r" ,ji
AI'i r {-.: il
Example Calculations
C !:i.i,) i.; i"i
Location HF Sinclair W@ds Cross Refinins, LLC - W6t Bountiful' UT
Source Heater EH2
Project No. AST-2023-4007
Run No. I
Parsmeter(s) Moisture
Molecular rffeight @RY) (Md), lb/lb-nole
Md = (0.44 x o/oCO2) + (0.32 x o/oO2) *
where,
COz-|!- crbon dioxide oncentration, 7o
Or-19-: oxygen @ncentration, %o
Md 2913 = lb/lb mol
Molecular Weight (WET) (Ms), lb/lFmolc
Ms = Md (1 - BWS) + 18.015 (BwS)
wherc,
= molcula wight (DRY), lbnb mol
= moi*ure frrction, dimmsionless
= lb/lb mol
(0.28 (100 - o/oCOz - o/oOz))
Md4
Bws__....9L
Ms 28.10
Average Velocity (Vs), ftlsm
Vs=85.49 x Cp
where,
Cp 0.84
AP,"_t'E
PrA
MrA
Vr-..-
x (A P t/z) avg x
= pitot tube coefficimt
= average pre/post test velocity head ofstrck gas" (in. H2O)l'2
= average prelpost test absolute stek temperature, oR
= ab$lute $ack g6 pressue, in. Hg
= mol@ulil reight of stack ga, lb,4b mol
= ff/rec
Average Stack Gas Flow at Stack Conditioas (Qa), acfm
Qa=50xVsxAs
where,
= strck g6 velocity, ff/s
= cross-srctional aea of stack, fl2
= rcfrn
Average Strck Gas Flow aa Standard Conditions (Qs), dscfm
Qsd = 17.636 x Qa x (l - BWS) x
Q"..'..- = average strck gas flow at stac* @nditions, acfm
BWS jL??_= moisure frction, dimensionless
P.-49.l-= abelute $ack g6 pressue, in. Hg
Ts...'.- = average prelpost test absolute stek temperature, oR
Qs - = dscfm
Dry Gas Meter Calibrstion Check (Yqa), percent
Y_
Yqa =
where,
Vr-..-
As 47 l7
Q"T
Pl
Ts
o
Vm **-)
x 100
Y __!Z_= .eter corection f&tor, dimeroionles
O 60 = m time, min.
Vr...:1!99L= total meter volme, dcf
T-:ll19-= abrclute metertemperature, oR
LH@ 1.898 = orrfice meter calibration wffrcienL in. H2O
Pb 26.22 = barometric pressure, in. Hg
AH avS_L\= average pressue diffoential of orifice, in H2O
Md 29.13 = moleula wight (DRY), lb/lb mol
(A H)' '---]:0;;-= average squde root pressue differential of orifie, (in. H2O)r'2
Yqa 4J = perent
17 of 44
I
I
l8 of44
r-:'xAIiarrce
ti r- if.j,a i:, ,'!a{,,11,,,
Emissions Calculations
Location HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT
Sou.ce
Project No. AST-2023-4007
Run Number Runl Run2 Run3 Average
Date
Start Time
Stop Time
nt2v23 tl2u23 lll2ll23
13,,20 14:41 16:20
14:20 15:41 17:20
Source Data
Fuel Factor (O2 drv). dscfMMBtu Fd 8,333 8,333 8,333 8,333
Calculated Data - Outlet
Jz Concentratio n. %o dry co. 5.98 6.02 6.09 6.03
NOx Concentration, ppmvd
NOx Emission Factor, lb/l\4MBtu (o2d)
C*o*
EFNo* ora
27.72
0.039
27.37
0.038
26.99 27.36
0.038 0.038
19 of 44
Method I Data
hriion HF SimlrirWmds Cmss Refininq, LLC - WBt Bountful, UT
Soorce HertstH2
Projcr No. AST-2023{m7
DNt$ lll2ll23
Dud Orientrthn: Vdical
Duct D6ign: Circultr
Distmce lmm Far W.ll to Outsile of Pon: l0l.m in
Nipple Letrgrh: 8.m in
DepthofDoct: 93.m in
Cmss Sectionrl Arer of Duc! 47. 17 ftr
No. ofT$t Potu: 2
NumtrcrofRedingsperPoint: I
Disme A: 32.0 ft
Di(mcc A Ducr Dhete^, ---i t-1*r U" > u.St
Distmce B: m ft
Distrnce B Ducl Dimctcrs: h (mil bc2 2)
Minimum NumbcrofTrrvere Poinh: 16
Acto.lNumberofTrn'ersPoinis: 3
Meerer(Iiltid sd D.re): DBR
Rcvic*'€r(Initid ad D.te): TCH
Tr$'eM
Point
o/o of
Dimctcr
Distmc€
ouhidcofwr[
I
l
{
5
6
7
E
I
l0
1l
t2
16.1
50.0
83.3
I 5.51
i6.50
71.11
23.53
5r.50
85 {7
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS
Nu"fid oltrrree points on a frandet
I
3
I
5
6
1
8
9
l0
ll
t2
3 {5 6 7 t 9 l0 lt l2
14.6 t6.1 6.1 -- Ll - 3.2 -- 2.6 -- 2-l
s5.l 50 0 25.0 -- 14.6 - 10.5 -- 8.2 - 6.1
- 83 I 75.0 - 29.6 - l9.l -- lt.6 - I I 8: .. "-' .. lll '. l1;i 11: : )1,'"
956 -- 80.6 -- 658 -- 156
E9.5 -- 17.1 - 64 t
i.,, -,,':',;it..;i.i -- 979
rPetent olttack dioneterfrou inside 'all to tNerse Nint
Sbck Diagnm
A= 32 n.
B=20fr.
Dcpth of Duct = 93 in.
Cross SstioMl tue
20 of 44
6AIfarrcE)
i'f.l ii"rAi
Runl-RMData
Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Boutiful, UT
Source: Heater 8l{2
Proiect No.l
Datc:
Tim
Unit
O, - Outlet NOx - Outlet
"/odry ppmvd
Valid Valid
Uncorrccted R@ Average (C"b)
C.l GN Conccntr.tion (CMA)
Prctest Syslan Zaro RespoNe
Posttest Systcm Zero RespoNe
AwragcZ.ro Repotr* (Co)
Pretest System Csl RespN
Posttesa System Crl RGpoM
Average Crl Rcsponse (CM)
Il:20
I3:21
13:22
13:23
l3:24
13,25
l3:26
l3:27
l3:28
l7:29
t3i30
l3:3 I
l3:32
l3:33
l3:34
13i35
l3:36
l3:37
l3:38
l3:39
l3:40
l3:41
13,42
13i43
l3:44
l3:45
l3:46
l1:47
I3:48
l3:49
l3:50
l3:51
13.52
l3:53
l3:54
l3:55
t3:56
l3:57
l3:58
l3:59
l4:00
l4:01
14102
l4:01
l4:04
l4:05
l4:06
l4:07
l4:08
14i09
l4: l0
l4:ll
l4:12
l4rl3
l4:14
l4:1 5
l4: l6
l4:11
l4i l8
l4: l9
5.98
I0.98
0.05
0.05
0.05
10.96
10.93
10.95
5.98
6.04
6.08
6.08
5.96
5.88
5.87
5.98
6.15
6.t4
6.09
6.t2
6.17
6.12
6.t I
6. l3
6.t2
6.08
6.tI
6.10
6. l0
607
6.07
6ll
604
6.09
5.96
5.96
5.92
6.05
6.06
5.94
5.86
5.80
5.87
5.87
5.85
J.99
6.05
6.06
6.03
6.01
5.76
5.72
5.85
5.89
5.93
5.93
5.75
5.72
5.60
5.90
6.01
6.06
6.04
6.01
5.96
5.75
5.85
6.02
608
27 50
49.91
046
0.46
0.46
49. l5
49.14
49.15
7
21.49
27.54
2"t.44
2't.31
27.37
27 36
27 40
27.76
27.76
27.68
27.78
27.74
27.47
27.53
27.75
21.54
27.72
27.77
27.51
21.70
27.55
27.40
27.U
27.69
x7.13
27.70
2'7 65
27.72
27.43
27.62
21.6t
27.21
27.39
27.47
27.66
27.30
27.74
27.59
27.80
27.85
27.50
27.42
27.62
27.35
27.t8
27.32
27.38
27.05
27.t4
27.01
27.31
27.57
27.62
27.52
27.44
27.29
27.05
21.36
27 63
2l of44
piaaffiipe
'riiali I'j,i.r.1:{l il i-r i i il
Run2-RMData
Imation: HF Sinclair
Sourcc:
Project No.:
Drt!:
Tim
Unit
Ststus
O, - Outlct NOx - Outlet
'/"dry ppmvd
Ru Avcr.ge (qb)
Crl Cos Concentrltion (CMA)
Prctest System Zcro Response
Posttest System Z.ro RespoM
Avcrage Zcro Rapom (Co)
Prctcst Syst.m C.l R6pon*
Posttest Syst m C.l RespoN.
Averagc Cal Responsc (Cy)
Comdted Rm
10.92 49.20
l4:41
14.42
14.43
l4:44
l4:45
l4:46
14147
l4:48
14149
l4:50
l4:5 I
l4:52
l4:53
l4:54
l4:55
l4:56
l4:57
l4:58
l4:59
I 5:00
l5:01
l5:02
l5:03
15r04
l5:05
l5:06
l5:07
l5:08
l5:09
l5: l0
l5:ll
l5:12
l5:13
l5:14
l5:15
l5:16
15.17
l5: l8
l5: l9
15:20
l5:21
15.22
l5:23
l5:24
l5:25
15,26
l5:27
I 5r28
l5:29
I 5:30
l5i3l
l5:32
l5:33
l5:34
l5:35
l5:16
15t37
l5:38
l5:39
l5:40
6.00
10.98
0.05
0.05
0.05
10.93
l0 90
6.04
5.01
6.07
6.08
6. l6
6.08
6.09
5.97
6.01
5.95
6.05
6.03
6.08
5.95
5.86
6.00
6.09
6.05
6.09
6.21
6. I3
5.86
5.70
5.68
5.69
6.01
5.98
5.96
5.98
6.07
6.03
6.01
6.09
5.88
5.77
5.80
6. l4
5.91
6.04
6. l0
6.13
6.15
6.13
5.83
6.00
5.93
6.00
6.04
6.05
6.05
6.1 I
6.12
6.09
6.13
6.00
5.95
5.91
6.00
5.99
21.20
49.91
0.46
0.51
0.49
49.t4
49 26
21.39
27lL
27.24
21.54
27.45
21.50
27.41
27.28
21.24
21.09
21.09
27.43
27.45
27.31
27.28
27.t5
27.26
27.22
27.35
27.65
27.56
27.3t
27.M
26.73
26.80
26.81
27.15
26.94
26.43
27.10
26.89
26.97
26.85
27.t2
26.98
27.26
26.84
27.22
27.O2
27.24
27.34
27.33
27.28
27.0t
27.01
27.03
26.91
27.t4
27.33
27.32
27.54
27.52
27.43
27.4t
27.40
27.04
2'7.14
21.26
22 of44
ru16rre-rf(.1 ti N i cn L ()11{i 1., l}
Run3-RMData
l
L*rtion: HF Sinclair Woods Crcs Refininq LLC - West Bouriful, UT
Sourcc:
Project No.:
Drtc:
Tim
Utrit
St tus
Or-Oudct NOt-Otrtlet
Y.tlry ppmvd
Rm Arerage (C.5)
Crl GG Conccrtrrtion (CMA)
Prctest Syst m Zcro Respore
Posttcrt Syst E Zrre RcspoN
Averag. Zcro R6poN (Co)
Prcaest Syrtcm C.l R6pl'e
Posttest System Crl R6pm
Arcragc Cd RerpN (CM)
l6:20
l6:21
16.22
l6:23
16124
l6:25
l6:26
16127
l6:28
l6:29
l6:30
l6:3 I
l6:32
l6:33
l6:34
l6:35
16r36
16t37
16r38
l6:39
l6:40
l6:41
l6:42
l6:43
l6:tA
l6:45
l6:46
l6:47
l6:4t
16:49
l6:50
l6:5 I
l6:52
l6:53
l6:54
l6:55
l6:56
l6:57
l6:58
l6:59
l7:00
l7:01
l7:02
l7:03
17:04
17i05
l7:06
17:07
l7:08
17tO9
l7rl0
l7:ll
l7:12
l7: l3
17:14
l7: l5
l7:16
l7:17
l7: l8
l7: t9
6.07
10.98
0.05
0.06
0.06
10.90
10.90
10.90
6.07
6. l0
6.08
5.08
6.04
5.95
6.04
6. l3
5.09
5.87
594
6.03
6.06
6.47
6.01
5.95
5.90
6.02
6.02
6.t2
6.03
6.09
6.13
5.97
5.98
5.95
6.00
6.12
6.09
6.05
5.98
6.02
6.00
6.03
6.02
6.06
5.98
5.95
6.09
6. t5
6. t5
6.2t
6. l5
6. l5
6.0t
6.09
6.10
6. l5
6.04
6.14
6.13
6. l3
6.07
6.10
6.2t
618
6.27
6.29
6.22
519
26.91
49.9t
0.51
0.69
0.60
49.26
49.27
49 27
27.35
27.09
27.34
21.20
27.41
27.29
21.tO
26,80
27.03
26.80
26.60
26.63
26.82
26.80
26.59
26.s1
26.62
26.44
26.78
26.65
27.t3
26.43
26.52
26.65
26.56
26.58
26.64
26.54
26.63
26.82
26.62
26.78
26.68
26.73
26.86
26.83
26.93
26.86
27.0t
26.80
26.67
26.94
26.14
26.80
26.75
26.t5
27.05
26.80
21.1t
27.37
27.36
27.6
27.45
27.21
27.39
27.49
27.10
27.47
27 37
23 of44
Method 1 Data
Lmrfior HFStuhir Woodr Cmrs LLC - W6t Boun.itul, Ut
Pmret No. AST-202ilm7
Drte llDl/23
Doctodentaiion: ffi
Dkt Deli$: Ciffi
Di.lme fmm F.r w.ll lo tuhide of Pod: m h
Nippb hgthr m h
DeptrofDud: !m h
Crq. $c.lon.l Arc. ofDud: 47 17 tl
No. ofTe.. Poft: 2
NuhbrofRerdiqr p.r Poht I
Dbtee Ar il ft
DliscADE.Dhten: 4l (nu.th>0.5)
Dnirm.a: m n
Dktuce B Ducl Di.ne.cr.: 26 (mBr b > 2)
MhinumNumberofTmteePoint.: re
ActurlNumbe.ofTdaeePolnk: re
Metlurer(lni6rlhdDrt): DR
RctLs.r(Inftid.ndD.le): TCH
CIRCULAR DUM '
LOCATION OF TUVERSE POII'N
Nurta of notrBc pohB on a diorut.,
I
3
1
s
6
7
E
9
l0
I
t2
116 - 6.7 -, 4.4 -' 32 - 26 - Zl
85.4 -- 25.0 -- 14.6 -' lO 5 -- E 2 -- 61
75.0 - 296 -. t9.4 - 146 -" ll8. - 'L' . lil .:. 21i . 11: )1,'"
956 -- 806 -- 65.8 - 156,,iii.ll1l1l ;;: iil
iti
*Peteilt o/strck diateterlroil haide \|all to tMB. Nnil
I
2
3
t
s
5
7
E
9
l0
ll
l2
ll
105
l9 4
323
611
80.6
895
968
2.98
9.77
18.04
30.04
62%
74X
Et 24
s02
ll
t7 3t4
26 t/t6
38 l/16
10 t5^6
82 t5/16
9t t/4
98
Skck Diapm
A=12i
B=20fr.
Depth ofDur = 93 in.
Cross $c!ml tuca
Dinurbance
aaaoaaaa
24 of 44
Method 4Data
lrcrtion
Source
Pmjd No.
Consob Unils / Mcthod
lun No.
)ate
ilrius
;t.d Time
lnd Tthc
lutr Timc, min (0)
I
tU2U23
VALD
ll:20
llrl9
0
M546
nt2v23
VALTD
I{:.lI
l5:J0
60
3
ttnt/21
VALID
l6:20
l 7:19
0
M5-26
[etcr Corretion Frtor (Y)
)rifrce Cdibmttun Vduc .^ll'at
[u Vruum, ir Hg
tn.r I?.L ah!- frl/mi. a"t m,r r* I
0.9?0
1.898
3
omtalS0
0.970
LE98
l
0.970
1.898
3
oimtal50
Volum, frJ
0
5
l0
l5
20
25
$
35s
J5
50
55
tr
torrl Mcrcr Volume. ftJ
530.105
5J2.1 t5
535.128
538.821
5+1.387
51r.1t I
5t7.826
550.527
551.{19
556 128
i59.211
562.126
565.r rl
565.2 l5
568.125
571.3? I
57J.5E{
576.581
519.621
582.187
585.125
588.166
59t 554
594.658
597.515
6m 555
35 3{0
ffi.625
603.852
6{r.781
609.992
6t2.9t7
6 15.891
619.021
623 t12
621 013
610.987
633.874
631.t25
ilo.210
39.585
Tem|fnture, "F
0
5
lo
l5
20
25
30
35
lo
ts
50
SJ
&
Av€ngeTempenture,'F (Tm)
Ar?mge Temp€ntore,'R (Tm)
Minimm Tempenuq'F
M€ter
58
58
58
58
57
59
59
59
60
60
6t
62
62
59
5I9
51
62
Pmb€Filter Imp. Eir
5:i
5l
53
53
53
5l
5{
5{
53
5l
51
54
53
s2
Mder
6l
6l
0
51
51
51
54
5{
5+
5l
53
53
52
56
5r6
52
Prebc rilter Imp. Erit
53
53
53
5t
5l
52
52
52
il
5l
53
5{
55
5l
Metff
52
52
52
52
52
5l
5l
5I
5l
50
50
5t
5t
5l
5ll
50
Prch Filler Imp. Eri
52
52
5l
5l
5l
50
50
.19
19
'19
49
50
50
50
t9
Bammerh Prcssr, in. Hg
Metcr OrificePrssurc, ir WC
Mcter Pr6sure, in. Hg
(Pb)
(^n
em)
26.22
l.m
26.29
30 3{l
26.22
t.m
26.29
30.835
26.22
l.2m
26.31
{ndy!i! TJpe
lmpinger I, Pr.r'Pod TBl, g
lmping€r 2, Prcr'Po3t TBt, g
Impinger3, PrdPosr T6l, g
lmpinger{, PrdPoir T6t, g
Yolure Wrter Colleded, mL (gc)
ihdard Wder Vohme,ft] ry{std)
Uoistoretrmtior Mesur€d (BWS)
srsMohrulewcight,lb^b-mle(dry) (Md)
DGM Crlibnlion CHVdE (Yoa)
Gcviffiric
H20
H20
Ernpl)
t12.1
161.8
3 15.{
012
163
529
i21
20.9
61.3
t2.L
9.9
H20
H20
Ernpty
163.3
529 I
321.5
169.2
537.1
105.8
5.t)
8.0
783
H20
H20
Empr)'
361.8
403.6
115.1
t51.2
406.1
318 {
92.t
2.8
3.0
IO{.2
.{.9 I I
0.139
29.13
96.1
1.560
0.129
29.11
0t
105 7
I 985
0.125
29.13
l4
25 of 44
26 of44
QA Data
Location HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refinins. LLC - West Bountiful, UT
Source Heater 8H2
Project No. AST-2023-4fi)7
Parameter(s) Moisture
Field Balance Check
Date 11t20t23
Balance ID 5a2881026
Certified Weight ID:SLC.IKG.3
Certifi ed Weight Expiration:tu2U24
Certified Weight (g):1000.0
Measured weight (g):999.9
Weight Difference (g):0.1
Dat€Barometric Pressurt Evidence of
dtmtqe2 Reading Verilied Calibration or
Renair reouired?Weather Station Location
tv20t23 Weather Station NA NA NA Woods Cross, UT
Date Meter Box ID Positive Pressure Leak Check
tU20t23 m5-26 Pass
2'l of 44
DGM Calibration-Orifi ces
Do.ument lI 620.004
Revisior 220
Effe€tive Dat(1/2s/23
lssuing Department Tech Services Pag(l of 1
Eouioment Detail - Drv Gas Meter
Console lD: t/5-26
Meter S/Ni 16621844
Critical Orifice S/N. '1330
Calibration Detail
lnitial Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (Pbr)
Final Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (PbF)
Averaqe Barometric Pressure, in. Hq (Pb)
25.65
25.66
25.66
Critifcal Orifice lD (Y)
K' Factor, ft3 RrP / in. wc.min (K)
Vacuum Pressure, in. Hg (V,
lnitial DGM Volume, ft3 (vmr)
Final DGM Volume, ft3 (Vm,
Iotal DGM Volume. ft3 (vm)
1330-3 1
0.8429
14.0
943.576
954.n1
11 195
1330-31 1330-25
0 6728
15.0
968 638
977s23
8.885
1330-25 1330-19
0.5186
17.0
992.375
999.338
6.963
1330-'19
08429 0.673 0.519
14.0
954.771
965 986
11.215
15.0
977.523
986.413
8.890
17.0
999 388
1,006.383
6.995
\mbient Temperature, 'F (Ta)
nitial DGM Temperature,'F (ImJ
:inal DGM Temperature,'F [lmF)
\veraqe DGM Temperature, 'F ( Tm)
67
66
66
66
67
66
61
67
66
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
68
68
68
68
68
68
68
68
Elapsed Time (O)
Meter Orifice Pressure, in. WC (AH)
Standard Meter volume, ft3 (Vmstd)
Standard Critical Orifice Volume, ft3 (Vco
lveter Correction Factor (Y)
Tolerance
Orifice Calibration Value (AH @)
Tolerance
Orifice Cal Check
10.00
3.50
9.7342
9.4226
0 968
0.002
1 928
0.030
10.00
3.50
9.7423
9.4226
0 967
0.003
1.926
0.028
10.00
2.20
7.6825
7.5282
0.980
0.010
1.888
0.010
10.00
2.20
7.6868
7.5211
0 978
0.008
1.892
0.006
10.00
i30
5.9938
5.7918
0.966
0.004
1.876
0 021
10.00
1.30
6.0214
5 7918
0.962
0 008
1.876
0.021
1.18 157 1.54
Meter Correction Factor ff)0.970
3rifice Calibration Value (AH @)t.898
Positive Pressure Leak Check Yes
Equipment Detail - Thermocouple Sensor
Reference Calibrator Make: OMEGA
Reference Calibrator Model: CL234
Reference Calibrator S/N: T-197207
Calibration Detail
Reference Temp.Display Temp Accuracv Difference
r OF %F
0
68
'100
460
528
560
0
67
100
460
527
560
0.0
0.2
0.0
0
1
0
223
248
273
683
708
733
223
247
272
683
707
732
0.0
01
0'l
0
l
1
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
1,100
t20a
760
860
960
1,060
'1,160
1,260
1,360
1,460
1,560
1.660
298
399
498
598
699
799
899
1,000
1,101
1,201
758
859
958
1,058
1,159
1,259
1,359
1,460
1,561
1,661
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.2
01
0.1
0.1
0.0
-0.1
-0.1
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
0
1
1
Personnel
Stacey Cunninqham
28 of 44
Calibration By:
Calibration Date:
Reviewed By:
RYAN LYONS
11/3/2023
#IAAI
I I r.1;..{;ilj'\i i;ti,,i:,r.'
Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT
Project No.: AST-2023-4007
NO2 Converter Check - Outlet
Analyzer Make thermo
Analyzer Model 42i-HL
Serial Number 16453124
Cylinder ID Number eb0033140
Cylinder Exp. Date 09.14.26
Cylinder Concentration, Dpm 50.0
Pre-Test Date lll2ll23 Time 10:59
Pre-Test Concentration, ppm 45.43
Pre-Test Efficiency, 7o 9l
Post-Test Date Time
Post-Test Concentration, ppm
Post-Test Effi ciencv. 7o
*Required Efficiency is > 90 %.
29 of44
-i '.'r ,'.?;
il*fri*
r/a\s
Accreditation #62754
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71107
800-551 -81 50
PGVP Vendor lo # Gl 2023
EPA PROTOGOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:
Product lD Number:
Cylinder Pressure:
coA #
Customer PO. NO.:
Customer:
:800331 40
24731
lCOO PSt(;
.800331 40.20230824-0
Certification Date:
Expiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Certification Dates:
)9t15t2023
)911412026
- Shreveport - LA
:800331 40.20230824
1567600'1 1
is calibration standard has been certified per the 12t531,
G1.
Certified Concentration(s)
SMART.CERT
ponent Concentration Uncertainty Analytical Principle Assayed On
trogen Dioxide 5O.O PPM to.s PPM FTIR 09 t01 t2023. 09 I 1 512023
Balance
E80057301 E80057301.20201020 0510412026 GMIS AIR NO2 96.4 PPM 1.028 C2190301.02
MKS 2O31DJG2EKVSl3T
MKS 2031 DJG2EKVSl 3T
017146467 08/31t2023
017146467 0911512023
This is to certify the gases referen@d have been €librated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifl€tions. This
clibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales lhat are traeable through National lnstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lntemational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% mnlidence level of the measurement, unless otherwise noted. This clibration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other lhan in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Seruices. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into ac@unt
when determining pass or fail.
;'^* Ifuk
i,/ ' '
Jasmine Godfrey
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Version 02-J Revised on 2018-09-17
30 of44
IrcE
r. .1 : i,l,
Location HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining , LLC 'West Bountiful, UT
tr-:.W
IAAI
l' f: r' i I I
QA Data
Source Heater 8H2
Project No. AST-2023-4007
Parameter O, - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Make
Model
S/N
Ooeratins Range
servomex
4900
100269
25
thermo
42i-HL
16453124
100
ylinder ID
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
NA
rr03686
rr03384
NA
NA
eb0097304
cc736761
Cylinder Certifed Values
Zero
Low
Mid
Hieh
NA
NA
10.98
24.0
NA
NA
49.91
99.1
Cylinder Expiration Date
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
NA
09. 19.3 l
10.t9.29
NA
NA
10.20.30
10.28.31
Tvoe of Samole Line Heated Sample Line
3l of 44
pgllffinoEr
-i fi {) il r\.i I CA L. $ R ()iJ F
Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining,LLC - West Bountiful, UT
Response Times
Source: Heater 8H2
Project No.: AST-2023-4007
seconds
Parameter Oz - Outlet NOx - Outlet
7*ro
Low
Mid
Hioh
30
NA
30
30
30
NA
30
30
Average 30.0 30.0
32 of44
ffiAliarpe Calibration Data
Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT
Source: Heater 8H2
Project No.: 4!T292!4992
Date: I ll2ll23
Parameter Ou - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Expected Average Concentration 5.00 20.00
Span Between
Low
High
Desired Soan
5.00
25.00
24.00
20.00
100.00
99.1 0
Low Range Gas
Low
Hioh
NA
NA
NA
NA
Mid Range Gas
Low
Hiqh
9.60
14.40
39.64
59.46
High Range Gas
Low
Hish
NA
NA
NA
NA
Actual Concentration (7o or ppm)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hieh
0.00
NA
10.98
24.00
0.00
NA
49.9r
99. l0
Response Time (seconds)30.00 30.00
Upscale Calibration Gas (Cur)Mid Mid
Instrument Response (% or ppm)
7*ro
Low
Mid
tlioh
0.00
NA
I 1.00
24.01
0.01
NA
49.54
99.14
Performance (7o of Span or Cal. Gas Conc.)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
0.00
NA
0.08
0.04
0.01
NA
0.37
0.04
Status
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
33 of 44
xAliarpe Bias/D rift Determination s
Lo.rtion,
Source: Heater 8H2
Project No.: AST-2023-4007
Perameter Oz - Outlet NOx - Outlel
Run 1 Dete lll2ll23
ipan Value
.nitial Instrument Zero Cal Response
.nitial Instrument Upscale Cal Response
)retest System Zero Response
)osttest System Zero Response
lretest System Upscale Response
losttest Svstem Upscale Response
24.00
0.00
l1 00
00s
0.05
10.96
t0 93
99.10
001
49.54
0.46
0.46
49.15
49.14
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Snan
0.21
021
-0.17
-0.29
0.45
0.45
-0.39
-0.40
)rift (%)
Lero
vlid
0.00
-0. l3
0.00
-0 0l
Run 2 Drte lll2ll23
Span Value
Instrument Zero Cal Response
Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem Uoscale Response
24.00
0.00
l 1.00
0.05
0.05
10 93
10 90
99 10
0.01
49.54
0.46
0.51
49.14
49.26
Bras (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Pnctracf Snan
021
021
-0.29
-0.42
0.45
0.50
-0.40
-0.28
Drift (%)
Zero
Mid
0.00
-0.12
0.05
0.12
Run 3 Date lll2ln3
Span Value
Instrument Zero Cal Response
Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
p^atfeei Sw<tcm I Tnc.ale Resn^n<p
24 00
0.00
11.00
005
0.06
10.90
10.90
99.1 0
0.01
49.54
0.s t
0.69
49.26
49.27
lias (%)
)retest Zero
)osttest Zero
)retest Span
)ostfecf Snan
0.21
0.25
-0.42
-0.42
0.s0
0.69
-0.28
-0.27
)rift (%)
Lero
VTid
0.04
000
0.18
001
34 of 44
* rr'. :,' ,-'-\: i-"--,_
SaeqfuiI -;::--. :
z, n '..s ^e**rils*
Accreditation ,162754
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71'107
800-551 -81 50
PGVP Vendor lD # Gl 2023
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:
Product lD Number:
Cylinder Pressure:
coA #
Customer PO. NO.:
Customer:
tR03686
25371
9OO PSIG
1R03686.20230831 -0
Certification Date:
Expiratlon Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Certification Dates:
)9t2112023
)sh912031
- Shreveport - LA
1R03686.2023083'l
1 07553544
been certified per the May 201 2 EPA 't2t53',t,
G1,
I Do Not Use This Cvlinder Below 100 psig (0.7 Megapascal).
Certif ied Concentration(s)
SMART.CERT
Concentration Uncertainty
!ol1 ,/"
t0.03 o/o
Analytical Principle Assayed On
ogtzu2023
09t18t2023
rbon Di 10.9 0/o
10.98 %
FTIR
MPA
Nitrogen Balance
Analytical Measurement Data Available Online
ccl 37012.20230228
E80022021 .20180323
Analytical lnstrumentation
o2
co2 FTIR
Thermo
MKS
41 0i
i,KS 2031DJG2EKVS13T
1162380025 09t18t2023
011146467 09/2112023
This is to certify the gases referened have been calibrated/tested, and verifled to meet the defined specifications. This
mlibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable thrcugh National lnstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lntemational System of Units (Sl). The basis of @mpliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement paramete6 to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded un@rtainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confidence level of the measurement, unless otherwise noted. This calibration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reprodued other than an full, without written approval from Red Ball
Techniel Gas Services. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
/. t1
4r.n^- ".Irt{n7
Jasmine Godfrey
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
VeEion 02-J. Revised on 2018-09-17
35 of44
.i'r\ Jzl r
Sffi€"t:.X:;i':i?_,'n'..y ^&*,*ris*
Accreditation #62754
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71107
800-551 -81 50
PGVP Vendor lO # Gl 2021
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:
Product lD Number:
Cylinder Pressure:
coA #
Customer PO. NO.:
Customer:
iR03384
127907
IgO{J PSIG
iR03384.2021 't 01 2-0
Certification Date:
Expiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Certif ication Dates :
tot21t2021
10119t2029
?R03384.2021 10'1 2
t03923781
This calibration standard has been certified per the May 201 12t531,
G2.
I
SMART.CERT
ponenl Concentration Uncertainty Analytical Principle Assayed On
!0.18 %
10.13 o/o
cc72771220201022 04tO612029
EA0039149.20190610 11t2412027
EA0078072.20180504 07121t2026
E8O100923 20201022 05119t2029
20.03 vo
24.75 0/o
19 47 vo
1162980025 10101t2021
1162980025 1011912021
This is to certify the gases referenc€d have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifications. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable thrcugh National lnstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lntemational System of Units (Sl). The basis of @mpliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncerlainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confldence level of the measurement, unless otheMise noted. This calibration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Seruies. lf not included, the uncerlainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
fitr jq|tu
Brittany Johnson
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Version 02-J. Revised on 2018-09-17
16 of 44
Airga$"
an Air Liquide company
Airgas Specialty Gases
Airgas USA LLC
525 North Industrial Loop Road
Tooele, UT 84o74
Airtas.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Grade of Product: EPA PROTOCOL STANDARD
Part Number: E03N199E15A01D0
Cylinder Number: E80097304Laboratory: 124 - Tooele (SAP) - UT
PGVP Number: 872022
Gas Code: CO,NO,NOX,BALN
Expiration Date:
Reference Number: 153-402560601-1
Cylinder Volume: 144.0 CF
Cylinder Pressure: 2015 PSIG
Valve Outlet: 660
Certification Date: Oct2O,2022
Oct 20, 2030
Certification performed in accordance with "EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards (May 201 2)" document EPA
6OO/R-1 2/531 , using lhe assay procedures listed. Analytical Methodology does not require coneclion for analytical interference. This cylinder has a total analytical
uncertainty as stated below with a confidence level of 95%. There are no significant impurities which affect the use of this calibration mixture. All concentrations are on a
mole/mole basis unless otheMise noted. The results relate only to the items tested. The report shall not be reproduced except in full without approval of the laboratory. Do
Not Use This Cylinder below '100 psig, i.e. 0.7 megapascals.
Triad Data Available Upon Request
Sianafirre on file
Not Use This Cylinder below '100 e
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Gomponent Assay
Dates
Requested
Concentration
Actual
Concentration
Protocol Total Relative
Method Uncertainty
NOX 50.00 PPM 49.91 PPM
CARBON MONOXIDE 5O.OO PPM 50.39 PPM
NITRIC OXIDE 5O.OO PPM 49.85 PPM
NITROGEN Balance
Gl +l- 1.4o/o NIST Traceable 1011012022. 1Ol2Ol2O22
Gl +l- O.8o/o NIST Traceable 10t10t2022
Gl +l- 1.4o/o NIST Traceable 1011012022, 1012012022
Tvpe Lot lD Uncertainty Expiration Date
CALIBRATION STANDARDS
Cylinder No Concentration
NTRM 12011221
PRM 12386
NTRM 210607-24
PRM 12395
NTRM 21060713
GM|S 401648675102
GM|S 1534002020104
Aug 31,2024
Feb 20, 2o2o
Sep 21 ,2025
Feb 02,2022
Sep 24, 202s
Feb 01, 2023
Apr 30,2024
KALOO4127 49.24 PPM CARBON MONOXIDE/NITROGEN 0.6%
D685025 9 91 PPM NITROGEN DIOXIDE/AIR
cc708080 48.41 PPM NITRIC OXIDE/NITROGEN
D887660 9.91 PPM NITROGEN DIOXIDE/AIR
2.0%
1.20h
2.0%
CC708049 48.41 PPM NITRIC OXIDE/NITROGEN 1.2o/o
CC5OO959 5.074 PPM NITROGEN DIOXIDE/NITROGEN 2.1Oh
EBO13OO55 4.81 PPM NITROGEN DIOXIDE/NITROGEN 2.Oo/"
The SRM, NTRM, PRM, or RGM noted above is only in reference to the GMIS used in the assay and not part of the analysis
lnstrumenUMake/Model
ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT
Analytical Principle Last Multipoint Calibration
Nicolet iS50 AUP21 10269 CO LCO
Nicolet iS50 AUP211O269 NO LNO
Nicolet iS50 AUP2110269 N02 impurity
FTIR
FTIR
FTIR NO2 impurity
oct05,2022
od 13,2022
od 12.2022
Approved for Release
37 of44
Page I of 1
^.
\. . i.?.
-ji_t,j-l-::fldr#{.'.---\-:.'4.'^\ s
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71101
800-551-8't 50
PGVP Vendor lo # Gl 2023
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:
Product lD Number:
Cylinder Pressure:
coA #
Customer PO. NO.:
Customer:
1c736761
23812
1900 PS|G
1c736761.2023101 1-0
Certification Date:
Expiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Certification Dates :
10t30t2023
1ol?t t2u:41
- ShreveDort - LA
101 358901
SMART-CERT
standard has been certified per the May 201 2 EPA l,
Gl.
I Oo Not Use This Cylinder Below 100 psig (0.7 Megapascal).
Certified Concentration(s)
Concentration Uncertainty Analytical Principle Assa)/€d On
tric Oxide 99.1 PPM 10.8 PPM Chemiluminescence 10t16t202X. fit3012023
Total Oxides of Nitrogen 99.5 PPM
Balance
Analytical Measurement Oata Available Online
Analytical lnstrumentation
Chemiluminescence 't 15261001 7 10to2t2023
A1M066143 ALM066143.202301 17 08/28t2031 GM|S N2 NO 280 PPM 0.563 SRI\II 1687b
This is to certify the gases referenced have been Glibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifications. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National lnstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lntemational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
faclor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confidence level of the measurement, unless otheruise noted. This calibration ertificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Services. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
,/ora,, W,rh-
Aaron Varelas
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Version 02-J. Revised on 2018-09-17
38 of44
pl/lffirrcEr
.I f l; I I l.i t i.:, A L. {} Ii1 r.) i.i t:)
Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining LLC - West Bountiful, UT
Source: Heater 8H2
Project No.: AST-20234007
Datez ll/2112023
Traverse Point Time o2
(Y"l
NOx
(oom)
A-1
2
3
I l:34
I l:35
I l:36
3.93
3.90
3.81
3.9
24.00
24.03
23.69
23.9Averase
Criteria Met Sinsle Point Sinele Point
Samoline Method Point Sam
39 of44
40 of44
HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining LLC
NOx Source Testing
8H2
Source Production Data
| _ I rl i:ra::i: rl I
;!,.. r .,,.:aliili,l;: I i..i)
':i!{i:!l?:ii*3ilriirl,'rl;
::a:'l:'r'I t '
:r:ll'.irl.5i:,:li.l i| ,. i:l{i.,)::rillrri:,i.ii,l;is
"::',r,.:., .:. :!:,;.:::. ;a:
K,t&i&,_ r::rrg !,rr . &rrlr..;,sl;r' :
gift .': ir'.- !rr,?:.i: rlF1S1 !r' ,:;,tr:'f ..tl
.:: r.,.,..,,:, : jl,-:;.,1;...,
tno
. | .a i,t:tt1.4....r.i,.. rt.:
iil4$t#iil
,r , ,, i::r11!.r:::. i,:rllltr..llirl
Lu2L/2023 1:20 PM 2:19 PM 1691.04 70.46 1020.81 70.46 7L.93
Lu2Ll2023 2:4tPM 3:40 PM t682.28 70.09 1020.81 70.09 7L.55
LL/2L12023 4:20 PM 5:19 PM 1559.39 69.56 1020.81 69.56 7L.OL
41 of44
8H2 Test Process Data-NOx Testing
Year 2023
Meter: 8F\406.PV
Descriptior Fuel Gos flow to 8H2
Units: mscf/d
Notes:
Testine Process Data
,r;f : :li&igcfli* :.i... i i'
tl:Nffi:t$1691.04
t682.28
ll|l*&i#i$,:i,'1569.39
>90% Production Check
:lt$.*#iryfi iilgriilllri:i ,iliili:fl*f i :,'r,l *:t',?6.:::::*ttffi!:i€
ffi$ffitl
il::S,t 1t,::::$
i,,,,4ffi
.*tria3'
1591.04 1599.88 99.48o/o
t682.28 1699.88 98.96%
1559.39 1699.88 98.2L%
42 of 44
9_--Amarpe
' Locaiion:'HF Siniiaii woodi Cross Refining, LLC - west Bountiful, Ut
Project No.: AST-2023-4007
FUEL FACTOR CALCULATION BASED ON FUEL ANALYSIS
COMPONEN'I MW tr{OLEo/"MOI-ES C MOLES H MOLES O MOLES N MOLES S
HYDROGEN 2.016 35.tn2 70222
HELIIJN 4.003
METHANT 16.043 42.0991 42.099 168.396
WATEF r8 015
CARBON MONOXIDE 28.010
NITROGEN 28.013
ETHYLENE 28.054 4.2966 8.593 1 7.1 86
ETHANE 30.070 8.0208 16.042 48.r2s
OXYGEN 31.999
HYDROGEN SULFIDE 34.076
ARGON 39.948
PROPYLENE 42.08t
CARBON DIOXDE 44.010
PROPANE 44 097 10.3817 3l 145 83.054
BUTENE 56.08 0.0907 0.363 0 726
ISO-BUTANE 58.24
N-BUTANE 58.24
PENTENES 70.35
ISO-PENTANE 72 5l
N.PENTANE 72 5t
BENZENE 78 t4
HEXANI 86,78
TOLUENE 92.4l
HEPTANE 100.205
ETHYLBENZENE 106 168
XYLENE 106 158
TOTAL 100.000 98242 387.709
WEIGHT (LBS)r.179.982 390.772
WEIGHT%75 r22 24.878 0.000 0.000 0.000
LHV (BTU/SCF)916. l6 = SUM [ (MOLEYoi . LHV ) = 100 ]
=SUM[(MOLE%, . HHVi)* 100]
= SUM [ (MOLE %i o DENSITY ) = 100 ]
= DENSITY (LB/SCF) + DENSITYATR P.0763 LB/SCF)
= HHV = DENSITY
= SUM [ (MOLEYoi . MW i) = 100 ]
= 1go . 7 13.64 .%H) + (1.53 .%C) + (0.14 o%N) + (0.57'%S) - (0.46 o%O) 1 * GCV
=196 .715.57.%oH) + (1 .53o%C) + (0.14o%N) + (0.57'%S) - (0.46.%O) l* GCV
= lo6 . (0.321 c%C) + GCV
=0.209oFd+F"
HHV GTU/SCF)r r,020.8 I
DENSITY (LB/SCF)I 0.041
SPECIFIC GRAVITY:0.542
GCV {BTU/LB):24.660
MW (LBILBMOLE):15.708
F6 (DSCF/IvIMBTU):8,333
F* (WSCFMMBTU):10.280
F"(SCF/MMBTU):978
Expected Fol 1.781
43 of 44
,ffi"R[ffitH^lfi''
DEC - 1 ?l[?3
DMSION OF AIR OUALITY
44 of44
HF Sinclair 8H2 heater NOx 11-21-2023 rev
Reference Methods 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, & 19
Source Information
Company Name Holly Frontier
Company Contact:F. Travis Smith
Contact Phone No.801-299-6625
Stack Designation:Heater 8H2
Test & Review Dates
Test Date:11/21/2023
Review Date: 1/12/2024
Observer:none
Reviewer:Robert Sirrine
Emission Limits Emission Rates
SO2 NOX CO SO2 NOX CO
lbs./MMBtu 0.0400 0.038
lbs./hr.
ppm 50.0 27.36
Percent
%O2 Correction as a whole #
Test Information Heat Input
Stack I.D. inches As ft^2 Y Dl H @ Cp Pbar Pq (static)
fuel flow rate
(Btu/hr.)
Heat Input
(Btu/hr.)
93.00 47.173 0.9700 1.898 0.76 25.53 -0.304
Contractor Information
Contact: Charles Horton
Contracting Company: Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Address: 3683 W 2270 S, West Valley, Utah 84120
Phone No.: 352-663-7568
Project No.:
8333

Division of Air Quality
Instrumental Reference Methods - Gaseous Measurements
Round
Method 19 - F factors for Coal, Oil, and Gas
Fd Fw Fc
scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu
Diluent
F factor used
O2
CO2
Anthrocite 2
Bituminous 2
Lignite
Natural
Propane
Butane
10100
COAL
OIL
GAS
9780
9860
9190
8710
8710
8710
10540
10640
11950
320
10610
10200
10390
1970
1800
1910
1420
1040
1190
1250
Wet CEM
Correct For O2
CO2 Interference w/CO
Yes
Yes
Yes
HF Sinclair 8H2 heater NOx 11-21-2023 rev
Division of Air Quality
NSPS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification Test - CEMS Certification
Holly Frontier
Heater 8H2
Average Emission
Dry SO2 NOX CO
lbs./MMbtu 0.038 Average % concentration
lbs./hr.CO2 O2
ppm or % 27.36 6.03
Run 1 Enter O2 or CO2
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)3.86E-02 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 3.311E-06
lbs./hr.#VALUE! 5.98
ppm or %27.72 5.98
Run 2
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)3.82E-02 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 3.269E-06
lbs./hr.#VALUE! 6.01
ppm or %27.37 6.00 Raw Value
Run 3
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)3.79E-02 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 3.223E-06
lbs./hr.#VALUE! 6.09
ppm or %26.98 6.07 Raw Value
Run 4
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm or %Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
O2
CO2
Clear
lbs./MMBTU
HF Sinclair 8H2 heater NOx 11-21-2023 rev
Calibration Error Test
Test Date November 21, 2023 O2
CS - Cal. Span 24.00
Units %
Cylinder No. Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Passed Cal.
Mid-level 10.98 11.00 0.02 0.08% Passed Cal.
High-level 24.00 24.01 0.01 0.04% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of CS - Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 45.75%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date CO2
CS - Cal. Span
Units %
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level
Mid-level
High-level
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level
100% of Cal. Span High-level
Test Date SO2
CS - Cal. Span
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level
Mid-level
High-level
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level
100% of Cal. Span High-level
Test Date November 21, 2023 NOx
CS - Cal. Span 99.10
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.010% Passed Cal.
Mid-level 49.91 49.54 0.37 0.373% Passed Cal.
High-level 99.10 99.14 0.04 0.040% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.36%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date CO
CS - Cal. Span
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level
Mid-level
High-level
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level
100% of Cal. Span High-level
HF Sinclair 8H2 heater NOx 11-21-2023 rev
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
Holly Frontier
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Heater 8H2
CS Calibration Span 99.10 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % % Unprotected
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 49.91 10.98
High-Level 99.10 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.4% 45.8%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CDir CMA 49.91 10.98
Calibration Error Test
Cs - Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.01 0.00
Mid-Level 49.54 11.00
High-Level 99.14 24.01
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 49.54 11.00
Low-Level 0.01% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0.01 0
Status Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.37% 0.08%
ppmdv Difference 0.37 0.02
Status Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.04% 0.04%
ppmdv Difference 0.04 0.01
Status Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.46 0.05 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.45% TRUE TRUE 0.21%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.45 TRUE TRUE 0.05
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 49.15 10.96
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.39% TRUE TRUE 0.17%
Difference TRUE 0.39 TRUE TRUE 0.04
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:11/21/2023 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
27.5 6.0 CO
0.0% 27.7% 0.0% 0.0% 24.9%CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.46 0.05 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.45% TRUE TRUE 0.21%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.5 TRUE TRUE 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 49.14 10.93
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.40% TRUE TRUE 0.29%
Difference TRUE 0.4 TRUE TRUE 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.00% TRUE TRUE 0.00% Drift
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE TRUE 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.01% TRUE TRUE 0.13%
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE TRUE 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass
Heater 8H2 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
47.173 25.53 -0.30 25.51 5.98
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws #VALUE!
0.9700 0.76 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs
(ft/sec.)Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
#VALUE! #VALUE! 71.92625218 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 1.00 1.000
2 1.00 1.000
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
NOTE
These cells scans for the appropriate
Cdir gas after the Cm
entered.
If this scan is incorrect change the
Cdir to the correct gas value.
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
CO Calibration Gas
Failed Bias Dialog
HF Sinclair 8H2 heater NOx 11-21-2023 rev
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
Holly Frontier
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Heater 8H2
CS Calibration Span 99.10 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 49.91 10.98
High-Level 99.10 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.4% 45.8%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 49.91 10.98
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.01 0.00
Mid-Level 49.54 11.00
High-Level 99.14 24.01
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 49.54 11.00
Low-Level 0.01% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0.01 0
Status Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.37% 0.08%
ppmdv Difference 0.37 0.02
Status Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.04% 0.04%
ppmdv Difference 0.04 0.01
Status Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.46 0.05 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.45% TRUE TRUE 0.21%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.45 TRUE TRUE 0.05
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 49.14 10.93
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.40% TRUE TRUE 0.29%
Difference TRUE 0.4 TRUE TRUE 0.07
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:11/21/2023 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
27.2 6.0 CO
0.0% 27.4% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.51 0.05 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.50% TRUE TRUE 0.21%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.5 TRUE TRUE 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 49.26 10.90
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.28% TRUE TRUE 0.42%
Difference TRUE 0.3 TRUE TRUE 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.05% TRUE TRUE 0.00% Response Spec.
Difference TRUE 0.1 TRUE TRUE 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.12% TRUE TRUE 0.12%
Difference TRUE 0.1 TRUE TRUE 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass
Heater 8H2 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
47.17 25.53 -0.30 25.51 6.01
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws
0.9700 0.76 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
#VALUE! #VALUE! 71.54857494 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 1.00 1.000
2 1.00 1.000
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
HF Sinclair 8H2 heater NOx 11-21-2023 rev
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
Holly Frontier
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Heater 8H2
CS Calibration Span 99.10 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 49.91 10.98
High-Level 99.10 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.4% 45.8%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 49.91 10.98
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.01 0.00
Mid-Level 49.54 11.00
High-Level 99.14 24.01
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 49.54 11.00
Low-Level 0.01% 0.00%
ppmv Difference 0.01 0
Status Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.37% 0.08%
ppmv Difference 0.37 0.02
Status Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.04% 0.04%
ppmv Difference 0.04 0.01
Status Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.51 0.05 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.50% TRUE TRUE 0.21%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.5 TRUE TRUE 0.05
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 49.26 10.90
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.28% TRUE TRUE 0.42%
Difference TRUE 0.28 TRUE TRUE 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:11/21/2023 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
26.9 6.1 CO
0.0% 27.2% 0.0% 0.0% 25.3% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.69 0.06 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.69% TRUE TRUE 0.25%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.7 TRUE TRUE 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 49.27 10.90
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.27% TRUE TRUE 0.42%
Difference TRUE 0.3 TRUE TRUE 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.18% TRUE TRUE 0.04% Response Spec.
Difference TRUE 0.2 TRUE TRUE 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.01% TRUE TRUE 0.00%
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE TRUE 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass
Heater 8H2 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
47.17 25.53 -0.30 25.51 6.09
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws
0.9700 0.76 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
#VALUE! #VALUE! 71.00754156 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 1.00 1.000
2 1.00 1.000
3
4
5
6 FT```
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog