The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDAQ-2024-0042971 DAQC-1299-23 Site ID 10123 (B4) MEMORANDUM TO: STACK TEST FILE – HOLLYFRONTIER WOODS CROSS REFINING, LLC THROUGH: Harold Burge, Major Source Compliance Section Manager FROM: Robert Sirrine, Environmental Scientist DATE: November 27, 2023 SUBJECT: Source: FCCU WGS #2 Unit 25 Location: 1070 West 500 South, West Bountiful, Davis County, Utah Contact: F. Travis Smith: (801) 299-6625 Tester: Alliance Source Testing FRS ID #: UT00000049011000013 AO #: DAQE-AN101230057-23, dated November 15, 2023 Action Code: 3A Subject: Review of stack test report dated October 11, 2022 On October 11, 2023, Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) received stack test reports for testing of the FFCU #25 located at the HollyFrontier refinery in West Bountiful, Davis County, Utah. Testing was performed August 22-23, 2023, to determine the PM10 emission limits found in AO Conditions II.B.1.a and II.B.8.a. The DAQ calculated results are: Source Test Date RM/Pollutant DAQ Result Test Result Limit FCCU #25 8/22-23/23 CTM-039/Total PM10 0.19* 0.19* 0.60* FCCU #25 8/22-23/23 CTM-039/Filterable PM10 0.096* 0.096* 0.50* * lbs/1000 lbs coke burned DEVIATIONS: No deviations were noted. CONCLUSION: The test report appears to be acceptable. RECOMMENDATION: The FCCU #25 PM10 emissions appear to have been in compliance with the applicable limits at the time of testing. HPV: Yes. ATTACHMENTS: Stack testing reports received October 11, 2023 DAQ generated excel spreadsheets October 11,2023 I,TAH DEPARTMENT OF ENVIBONMENTAL OUALITY ,.tttF$nctur Mr. Bryce Bird, Director 0 CT 1 1 ?i?3 Hand Delivered 3ilffi:r::#S*'*entareuarity ^llll4 tr4t \vtr<1L le5 North le50 west DrvtsroN oF ArR ounlrrv Salt Lake City, Utah 84116 RE: Annual PMro Emissions Test Report- Unit 25 FCCU #2Wet Gas Scrubber (25FCC Scrubber) Dear Mr. Bird: ln accordance with Conditions II.B.8.a.l and [I.B.8.a.2 of Approval Order AN101230055-23, please find enclosed the results of HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining LLC's (HFSWCR) recent PMro emissions testing for our Unit 25 FCCU #2Wet Gas Scrubber (25FCC Scrubber). Testing was conducted on August 22-23,2023. The filterable PMro average of the three one-hour test runs was 0.096 lbs/I,000 lbs of coke burned. The condensable PMle averaSe of the three one-hour test runs was 0.095 lbs/I,000 lbs of coke burned. The total PMro (filterable plus condensable) average of the three one-hour test runs was 0.19 lbs/l,000 lbs of coke burned. This data is summarized in the table below: Results from the attached test report were also used to determine HF Sinclair's new limits. o Pressure loss across the filtering modules - 15.0 inH2O o Liquid to gas ratio - 0.19 Enclosed is a copy of the testing report. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact F. Travis Smith at (801) 299- 6625 or email at ftravis.smith@hfsinclair.com. HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining LLC 1070 W. 500 S, West Bountiful, UT 84087 801-299-6600 | HFSinclair.com New Limits Test Result (lbY1,000lbs coke bum) Limit 0bY1,000 lbs coke bum) o/o of Limit Agglo Filter dP (inH2O) Liquid to Gas Ratio fi.tG\ Filterable PMro 0.096 0.5 t9% 15.0 0.19Condensable PMro 0.095 Total PMro 0.19 0.6 32% I certiffthat: Testing was conducted while the source was operating at the rate and/or conditions specified in the applicable approval order, operating permit, or federal regulation; During testing, the source combusted fuels, used raw materials, and maintained proc€ss conditions representative of normal operations, and operated under such other relevant conditions specified by the Director; Based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the state,ments and information contained in the report are tnre, accurate, and complete. Sincenely, Yra\-S,.^.-.----7= Dustin Simmonds Vice President and Refinery Manager c: E. Benson (r) File 2.4.1.1.2.1 K. Anrold J. Barton UTAH DEPARTiVIENT OF EI\NIBONMENTAt OUAUTY nfiffiNt['ilfi%rAL'YAllmre Source Test Report HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC 1070 West 500 South West Bountiful, UT 84087 Source Tested: FCCU WGS Unit25 Test Dates: August 22-23,2023 Project No. AST-2023 -287 8 Prepared By Alliance Technical Group, LLC 3683 W 2270 S, Suite E West Valley City, UT 84120 pulfrrpe .I-EOHNICAL GNOLFi Source Test Reporl Test Program Summary Regulatory Information Permit No. Source Information DAQE-AN101230055-23 Source Name Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit (FCCU) Wet Gas Scrubber (WGS) Contact Information Source ID Unit 25 Target Parameters FPM, CPM Test Location HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC 1070 West 500 South West Bountiful, UT 84087 Eric Benson eric.benson@hfsinclair.com (80t) 299-6623 F. Travis Smith ft ravis. sm ith@hfsinclair.com (801')299-662s Test Company Alliance Technical Group, LLC 3683 W 22705, Suite E West Valley Ciry, UT 84120 Project Manager Charles Horton charles.horton@al liancetg.com (3s2) 663-7s68 Field Team Leader Rob Burton robert.burton@lliancetg.com (224)3s8-50ss QA/QC Manager Kathleen Shonk katie.shonk@alliancetg.com (8t2) 4s2-478s Report Coordinator Sarah Perry sarah.perry@alliancetg.com Analytical Laboratory Alliance Technical Group, LLC 5530 Marshall Street Arvad4 CO 80002 Eric Grosjean eric. grosjean@all iancetg. com (303) 420-se4e F{F Sinclair - West Bountiful, UTAST-2023-2878 2of6O Page i pilrfripe TECi-] NICAL GNOTF Source Tesl Report C er t ilic a t i on Sta I eme n I Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) has completed the source testing as described in this report. Results apply only to the source(s) tested and operating condition(s) for the specific test date(s) and time(s) identified within this report. All results are intended to be considered in their entirety, and Alliance is not responsible for use of less than the complete test report without written consent. This report shall not be reproduced in full or in part without written approval from the customer. To the best of my knowledge and abilities, all information, facts and test data are correct. Data presented in this report has been checked for completeness and is accurate, error-free and legible. Onsite testing was conducted in accordance with approved internal Standard Operating Procedures. Any deviations or problems are detailed in the relevant sections in the test report. This report is only considered valid once an authorized representative ofAlliance has signed in the space provided below; any other version is considered draft. This document was prepared in portable document format (.pdfl and contains pages as identified in the bottom footer ofthis document. r0t5t2023 Charles Horton, QSTI Alliance Technical Group, LLC Date HI Sinclair- West Bountiful, UTAST-2023-2878 3 of60 Page ii pillfripe Source Tesl Report Table ofContentsTECHNICAL GNOLP TABLE OF CONTENTS Ll Process/Control System Descriptions .......... l-l 1.3 Site-Specific Test Plan & Notification... ...... l-l 3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and 2 - Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate..... 3-l 3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3/3A - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide.......... ....................... 3-l 3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 - Moisture Content.......... ................. 3-l 3-4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 5 and202 - Total Particulate Matter............ ............. 3-l 3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Gas Dilution System Certification.. ..................3-2 3.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3/3A....................................... 3-2 LIST OF TABLES APPENDICES Appendix A Sample Calculations Appendix B Field Data Appendix C Laboratory Data Appendix D Quality Assurance/Quality Control Data Appendix E Process Operating/Control System Data IIF Sinclair- West Bountiful, UTAST-2023-2878 4 of50 Page iii 5 of60 pillfripe Source Tesl Reporl lnboduclionTECI-"lNICAL GNCLP 1.0 Introduction Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC (HF Sinclair) to conduct compliance testing at the Woods Cross refinery in West Bountiful, Utah. Portions of the facility are subject to provisions of the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Air Quality (UDAQ) Permit No. DAQE-ANI01230055-23. Testing was conducted to determine the emission rates of filterable particulate matter (FPM) and condensable particulate matter (CPM) at the exhaust of the Fluidized Catalytic Cracking Units (FCCU) Wet Gas Scrubber (WGS) Unit 25. l.l Process/ControlSystemDescriptions The FCCU is a stacked type of UOP technology. Reduced crude from the bottom of the crude tower is pumped to storage or straight to the FCCU. Feed is heated in an exchanger and mixed with recycled (fractionation tower bottoms) and side cut heavy gas oil. The combination is mixed with hot regenerated catalyst and is vaporized in the riser entering the bottom ofthe reactor. As the vapor rise to the reactor, cracking takes place wi*r carbon deposited on the catalyst. Spent catalyst leaves the reactor through a steam shipping leg and flows to the regenerator where air is blown in and the carbon is burned off reactivating the catalyst. Cyclones in the reactor and regenerator separate catalyst from the gases and vapors, Cracked products leave the reactor and go to the fractionator where they are separated into gas, LPF, gasoline, light gas and heavy gas oil. Regenerator off-gases are ducted to a WGS for particulate matter removal before gases are vented to the atmosphere through a vertical 199-foot-tall stack. The WGS is a control device for particulate matter. 1.2 Project Team Personnel involved in this project are identified in the following table. Table l-1: Project Team 13 Site-SpeciIic Test Plan & Notification Testing was conducted in accordance with the Site-Specific Test Plan (SSTP) submitted to UDAQ by HF Sinclair. HF Sinclair - West Bountiful, UT HF Sinclair Personnel Matthew Howes Alliance Personnel Rob Burton Dillon Brown Cael Krahn Jacob Mclain AST-2023-2878 6 of60 Page l-l 7 of60 rl i AltfuTECHNICAL GROUP So*ce Test Report Summary of Results 2.0 Summary of Results Alliance conducted compliance testing at the HF Sinclair Woods Cross refinery in West Bountiful, Utah on August 22-23, 2023. Testing consisted of determining the emission rates of FPM and CPM at the exhaust of the FCCU WGS Unit 25. Table 2-l provides a summary of the emission testing results with comparisons to the applicable I-IDAQ permit limits. Any difference between the summary results listed in the following table and the detailed results contained in appendices is due to rounding for presentation. Table 2-l: Summary of Results 0.003 r 0.s0 0.096 0.5 19 Concentration, grair/dscf Emission Rate, lb/hr Emission Factor, lb/1,000 lbs of coke burned Permit Limit, lb/1,000 lbs of coke burned Percent of Limit, 7o 0.0034 0.50 0.094 0.0027 0.44 0.084 0.0034 0.58 0.1I Concentration, grain/dscf Emission Rate, lb/hr Emission Factor, lb/1,000 lbs of coke burned 0.0040 0.60 0.1I 0.0037 0.61 0.12 0.01I 1.8 0.34 0.0061 1.0 0.19 0.6 32 otal Particulate Matter Data I Concentration, grain/dscf Emission Rate, lb/lr Emission Factor, lb/1,000 lbs of coke bumed Permit Limit, lb/1,000 lbs of coke bumed Percent of Limit, % I Total PM is the summation offilterable PM and condensable PM AST-2023-2878 8 of60 Page2-lIIF Sinclair - West Bountiful, UT 9 of50 s,i '-.' *turce 'l est lleport AII?!Pq ,,,-,,,,,* 3.0 Testing Methodology The emission testing program was conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3-1. Method descriptions are provided below while quality assurance/quality control data is provided in Appendix D. Table 3-l: Source Testing Methodology 3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and 2 - Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate The sampling location and number of traverse (sampling) points were selected in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method l. To determine the minimum number of traverse points, the upstream and downstream distances were equated into equivalent diameters and compared to Figure I - I in U.S. EPA Reference Test Method I . Full velocity traverses were conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 to determine the average stack gas velocity pressure, static pressure and temperature. The velocity and static pressure measurement system consisted of a pitot tube and inclined manometer. The stack gas temperature was measured with a K-type thermocouple and pyrometer. Stack gas velociry- pressure and temperature readings were recorded during each test run. The data collected was utitized to calculate the volumetric flow rate in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2. 3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3/3A - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide The oxygen (Oz) and carbon dioxide (COz) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3/3A. One (l) integrated Tedlar bag sample was collected during each test run. The bag samples were analyzed on site with agas analyzer. The remaining stack gas constituent was assumed to be nitrogen for the stack gas molecular weight determination. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.6. 33 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 - Moisture Content The stack gas moisture content (BWS) was determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4. The gas conditioning train consisted of a series of chilled impingers. Prior to testing, each impinger was filled with a known quantity of water or silica gel. Each impinger was analyzed gravimetrically before and after each test run on the same balance to determine the amount of moisture condensed. 3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 5 and 202 - Total Particulate Matter The total particulate matter (filterable and condensable PM) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 5 and202. The complete sampling system consisted of a glass nozzle, glass-lined probe, pre-weighed quartz filter, coil condenser, un-weighed Teflon filter, gas conditioning train. pump and calibrated dry gas meter. The gas conditioning train consisted of a coiled condenser and four (4) chilled impingers. The first, and HF Sinclair West Bountiful. UT Parameter U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods NoteVRemarks Volumetric Flow Rate t&2 Full Velocity Traverses Oxygen / Carbon Dioxide 3 t3A lntegrated Bag / Instrumental Analysis Moisture Content 4 Gravimetric Analysis Total Particulate Matter 5 t202 Isokinetic Sampling Gas Dilution System Certification 20s AST-2023-2878 l0 of60 Page 3- I Source Tesl Report 7'esting Methodologt second impingers were initially empty, the third contained 100 mL of de-ionized water and the last impinger contained 200-300 grams of silica gel. The un-weighed 90 mm Teflon filter was placed between the second and third impingers. The probe liner heating system was maintained at a temperature of 248 +25"F, and the impinger temperature was maintained at 68"F or less throughout testing. The temperature of the Teflon filter was maintained greater than 65'F but less than or equal to 85oF. Following the completion of each test run, the sampling train was leak checked at a vacuum pressure greater than or equal to the highest vacuum pressure observed during the run. Condensate was collected in the first dry impinger, therefore the front-half of the sample train (the nozzle, probe, and heated pre-weighed filter) was removed in order to purge the back-half of the sample train (coil condenser, first and second impingers and CPM filter). A glass bubbler was inserted into the first impinger. If needed, de-ionized ultra-filtered (DIUF) water was added to the first impinger to raise the water level above the bubbler, then the coil condenser was replaced. Zero nitrogen was connected to the condenser, and a 60-minute purge at 14 liters per minute was conducted. After the completion of the nitrogen purge the impinger contents were measured for moisture gain. The pre-weighed quartz filter was carefully removed and placed in container l. The probe, nozzle md front half of the filter holder were rinsed three (3) times with acetone to remove any adhering particulate matter and these rinses were recovered in container 2. All containers were sealed, labeled and liquid levels marked for transport to the identified laboratory for filterable particulate matter analysis. The contents of impingers I and 2 were recovered in container CPM Cont. #1. The back half of the filterable PM filter holder, the coil condenser, impingers I and 2 and all connecting glassware were rinsed with DIUF water and then rinsed with acetone, followed by hexane. The water rinses were added to container CPM Cont. #l while the solvent rinses were recovered in container CPM Cont. #2. The Teflon filter was removed from the filter holder and placed in container CPM Cont. #3. The front half of the condensable PM filter holder was rinsed with DIUF water and then with acetone, followed by hexane. The water rinse was added to container CPM Cont. # I while the solvent rinses were added to container CPM Cont. #2. All containers were sealed, labeled and liquid levels marked for transport to the identified laboratory for condensable particulate matter analysis. 3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Gas Dilution System Certification A calibration gas dilution system field check was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Method 205. Multiple dilution rates and total gas flow rates were utilized to force the dilution system to perform two dilutions on each mass flow controller. The diluted calibration gases were sent directly to the analyzer, and the analyzer response recorded in an electronic field data sheet. The analyzer response agreed within 2o/o of the actual diluted gas concentration. A second Protocol I calibration gas, with a cylinder concentration within l0% of one of the gas divider settings described above, was introduced directly to the analyzer, and the analyzer response recorded in an electronic field data sheet. The cylinder concentration and the analyzer response agreed within 27o. These steps were repeated three (3) times. Copies of the Method 205 data can be found in the Quatity Assurance/Quality Control Appendix. 3.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3/3A Cylinder calibration gases used met EPA Protocol | (+l- 2%) standards. Copies of all calibration gas certificates can be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix. AsT-2023-2878 HF Sinclair - West Bountiful, UT Page 3-2 Afi6rrce TECI_]NICAL GNOUP Source Tesl Report Testing Methodolofrt Low-Level gas was introduced directly to the analyzer. After adjusting the analyzer to the Low-Level gas concentration and once the analyzer reading was stable, the analyzer value was recorded. This process was repeated for the High-Level gas. For the Calibration Error Test, Low, Mid, and High-Level calibration gases were sequentially introduced directly to the analyzer. All values were within 2.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5o/o absolute difference. At the completion of testing, the data was also saved to the Alliance server. All data was reviewed by the Field Team Leader before leaving the facility. Once arriving at Alliance's office, all written and electronic data was relinquished to the report coordinator and then a final review was performed by the Project Manager. lIF Sinclair - West Bountiful, UTAST-2023-2878 l2 of60 Page 3-3 l3 of60 llllffirrcGr Tr{}r'1 N;*AL *n*LJ i:) Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refinins - West Bountiful. UT Appendix A Example Calculations Source: FCCU WGS Unit 25 Project No.: AST-2023-2878 Run No.: 1 Parameter: PM/CPM Meter Pressure (Pm), in. Hg AHPm = Pb*:--- 13.6 wherc, Pb-[[ = barometric pressure, in. Hg AH 1.450 = pressure differential oforifice, in H2O e*...Tl-:in.ug Absolutc Stack Gas Pressure (Ps), in. Hg Po Ps = Pb+- where, t3'5 Pb__jl!_= barometric pressure, in. Hg Pg;!]!-= static pressure, in. H2O Ps 25.53 : in. Hg Standard Meter Volume (Vmstd), dscf 17.636xYxVmxPmVmstd =Tmwhere. Y 1.05 = meter correction factor Vm 44.200 : meter volume, cf P. -}![_: absolute meter pressure, in. Hg Tm 533.3 = absolute meter temperature, oR Vmstd 39-297 = dscf Standard Wet Volume (Vwstd), scf Vwstd=0.047t6xVlc where, Vlc 180 = volume of H2O collected, ml v*rtd -8.489-: ,.f Moisture Fraction (BWSsat), dimensionless (theor€tical at saturated conditions) LO63?-ffi-6)BWSsat = where, Ts 140.3 : stack temperature, oF Ps 25.53 = absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg BWSsat 0231 = dimensionless Moisture Fraction (BWS), dimensionless (measured) VwstdDIAIC _- (Vwstd * Vmstd) where. Vwstd 8.489 : stmdard wet volume, scf Vmstd 39.297 : standud meter volme, dscf BWS1!.|[= dimensionless Ps l4 of60 anlmrrcEr TSt]il'\i{; Location: Source: Project No.: Run No.: Parameter: AL {;r:1 (}Ll r) HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refinins - West Bountiful, UT FCCU WGS Unit 25 AST-2023-2E78 PM/CPM Appendix A Example Calculations Moisture Fraction (BwS), dimensionless BWS = BWSmsd unless BWSsat < BWSmsd where, BWSsat 0.231 : moisture fraction (theoretical at saturated conditions) BWSmsd 0.178 : moisture fraction (measured) Bws.............9-!L Molecular lVeight (DRY) (Md), lb/lb-mole Md = (0.44 x o/oCO) + (0.32 x o/oO2) + (0.28(100- o/oCOz - o/oO2)) where,CorA orA Md 30.30 = carbon dioxide concentration, 7o = oxygen concentration, 70 = lb/lb mol Ms= where, Molecular Weight (WET) (Ms), lb/lb-mole Md (1 - BWS) + 18.01s (BWS) Md__.-[{_= molecular weight (DRY), lb/lb mol BWS .1!][ = moisture fraction, dimensionless Ms 28.12 : lb/lb mol Average Velocity (Vs), ftlsec Vs = 85.49 x Cp x (lyrtzravg x where,cp& AP,,,Ar'---&P'-A Ms 28.12 Vs 53.3 = pitot tube coefficient = velmity head of stack gas, (in. H2O)r/2 = absolute stack temperature, oR : absolute stack gas pressure. in. Hg = molecular weight ofstack gas, lb/lb mol : ff/sec Average Stack Gas Flow at Stack Conditions (Qa), acfm Qa=60xVsxAs where, Vr€= stackgas velocity, ff/sec As 8.73 = cross-sectional aea ofstack, ft2 Qu____Z!!!_= u.to Average Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions (Qs), dscfm PsQs=17.636x Qa x (1 -BWS) x r, where, Qu_Z!!]_= average stack gas flow at stack conditions, acfin BWS;[]!_= moisture fraction, dimensionless Ps 25.53 : absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg Ts 600.0 : absolute stack temperature, oR Qs 17,206 = dscfin l5 of60 FPWAIEIEe TC{:}-{ ru *AL $p*L, r: Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining - West Bountiful, UT Appendix A Example Calculations Source: FCCU WGS Unit 25 Project No.: AST-2023-2878 Run No-: I Parameter: PM/CPM Dry Gas Meter Calibration Check (Yqa), dimensionlBs Y-(,+**-) Yqa = where. where, x 100 Y 1.05 o60 Vm LA) Tm 533.3 AH@ 1.68sPb-3IIL AH avs I 450 Md 30.30,o")'"]-l:t6- Yqa 4.4 Volume of Nozzle (Vn), ftl 44.200 25.61 533 3 63 560 Isokinetic Sampling Rate (I), 7. : meter conection factor, dimensionless = run time, min. = total meter volume, dcf : absolute meter temperature, "R = orifice meter calibration cmfficient, in. H2O = barometric pressure, in. Hg = average pressure differential oforifice, in HrO = molecular weighi (DRY), lbnb mol = average squareroot pressure differentiat ofonfice, (in. H2O)r/2 = percent IsU, =F;(o.oozoos x vtc *Vm xPmxYr -l Tm) 25.53 r80 0 Ts Ps Vlc Vm Pm Y Tm Vn : absolute stack temperature, oR = absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg : volume of H2O collected, ml = meter volume, cf = absolute meter pressure, in. Hg = meter conectim factor, unitless : absolute meter temperature, oR = volume ofnozzle, ft3 ' - /-----rl-'- \ax60xAnxTs )xroo Vn 0 An Vs I Mn Vmstd C" 63.660 : nozle volume, ft3 60.0 : run time, minutes 0.00034 : area ofnozle, ft2 53.3 = average velocity, ft/sec 97.4 = o/o Filterable PM Concentration (C,), grain/dscf . _Mnx0.0154 " ---Vilil where, = filterable PM mass, mg = standtrd meter volume, dscf = grair/dscf 0.0319xTmx29 39.297 l6 of60 a€wAlAlEGr Tr6i'lNi{]AL fin$ilr Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining - West Bountiful, UT Appendix A Example Calculations Source: FCCU WGS Unit 25 Project No.: AST-2023-2878 Run No.: I Parameter: PM/CPM Filterable PM Emission Rate (PMR), lb/hr C"xOsx60pirrR = ffir- where, C. 0.0034 : filterable PM concentration, grain/dscf Qr _|].]!!_: avtrage stack gas flow at standard conditions, dscftn PMR 0.50 = lb/hr Filterabl€ PM Emission Frctor (EFpM), lb/1000 tbs coke burned PMREFpu = H where, PMR 0.50 : filterable PM emission rate, lb/hr FR 5n2 = process feed rate, lb/In EFpv 0.094 = lb/I,000 [b coke bumed Condensable PM Concentration (Ccpu), grain/dscf ^ Mcpu x 0.0154 LCPM = v,"rtd where, Mcpu L75 = condensable PM mass, mg Vmstd 39.297 : stmdard meter volme, dscf Ccpu 0.00069 : grain/dscf Condensable PM Emission Rate (ERcpM), lb/hr ccpux ar"uow ERcpr.a = -7.0E+03 where, CcpM 0.00069 = condensable PM concentration, grain/dscf Qr_l]r?!E_= average stack gas flow at standtrd conditions, dscfin E&pu 0.10 = lb/hr Condensable PM Emission Factor (EF6py), lb/I000 lbs coke burned E Rcpu bFcpu = E- where, ER{pM 0.10 = condensable PM emissionrate, lb/hr FR 5.272 : process feed rate, lb/hr EFcpu 0.019 = tb/1,000 lb coke bumed Total PM Concentration (C1py), grain/dscf Crpu=Cs+CcpM where, Cs 0.0034 = filterable PM concentration, grain/dscf CcpM 0.00069 = condensable PM concentration, grain/dscf Cw 0.0040 : grain/dscf I 7 of60 Appendix A Example Celculations TECHNICAL GROUP Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining - West Bountiful. UT Source: FCCU WGS Unit 25 Project No.: AST-2023-2878 Run No.: I Parameter: PM/CPM Totrl PM Emission Rate (ERpy), lb/hr ERrpa=PMR+ERcpM where, PMR ERcpu ERm 0.10 0.60 ERrnr FR EFrmr Total PM Emission Rate (ERp6p), lb/Ifi)0 lbs coke burned ERrpuLtrpu = ;u-- where, : filterable PM emission rate, lb/hr : condensable PM emission rate, lb/hr : lb/hr = total PM emission rate, lb/ton = process feed rate, lb/hr = lb/l,000 lb coke bumed 0.50 0.60T 0.1I l8 of60 l9 of60 NAlAlEeTECtf{,(lAL nn()ilr) Emission Calculations Location HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refinine - West Bountiful, UT Source FCCU WGS Unit 25 Project No. AST-2023-2E78 Peremeter PM/CPM lun Number Runl Run2 Run3 Averase )ate itart Time itop Time lun Time. min (e) 8t22t23 l5:50 l6:56 60.0 8t23t23 9:23 l0:26 60.0 8t23t23 14:25 15:29 60.0 60.0 INPUT DATA Coke Burned, 1,000 lb/hr Barometric Pressure, in. Hg Meter Correction Factor Orifice Calibration Value Meter Volume, ft3 Meter Temperature, oF Meter Temperature, oR Meter Orifice Pressure, in. WC Volume H2O Collected, mL Nozde Diameter, in Area ofNozzle, ftz Filterable PM Mass, mg Condensable PM Mass. ms (FR) (Pb) (Y) (^H @) (vm) (rm) (Tm) (AH) (vlc) (Dn) (An) (Mn) (M"o-) 5.272 25.50 1.05 1.685 44.200 73.7 533.3 1.450 180.0 0.250 0.0003 8.5s 1.75 5.23r 2s.50 1.05 r.685 49.075 74.0 533.7 1.95 8 188.9 0.250 0.0003 7.50 3.00 5.1 87 25.50 1.05 1.685 50.845 83.2 542.8 2.100 196.3 0.250 0.0003 9.90 20.65 5.230 25.50 1.05 1.685 48.040 77.0 536.6 1.836 188.4 0.250 0.0003 8.65 8.47 ISOKINETIC DATA Standard Meter Volume, ft' Standard Water Volume, ft3 Moisture Fraction Measured Moisture Fraction @ Saturation Moisture Fraction Meter Pressure, in Hg Volume at Nozzle, ft3 Isokinetic Sampling Rate, (%) DGM Calibration Check Value, (+l- 5o/o) (Vmstd) (Vwstd) (BWSmsd) (BWSsat) (Bws) (Pm) (vn) (r) (Y.,) 39.297 8.489 0.178 0.211 0.178 25.61 63.660 97.4 4.4 43.665 8.909 0.169 0.240 0.169 25.64 70.213 96.3 -0.1 44.497 9.258 0.172 0.233 0.172 25.65 71.662 96.7 -0.8 42.486 8.885 0.173 0.234 0.173 25.64 68.51 96.8 1.2 EMISSION CALCI]LATIONS Filterable PM Concentration, grain/dscf Filterable PM Emission Rate, lb/hr Filterable PM Emission Factor lb/1,000 lb coke burned (c,) (PMR) (EFpv) 0.0031 0.50 0.096 0.0034 0.s0 0.094 0.0027 0.44 0.084 0.0034 0.s8 0.11 londensable PM Concentration, grain/dscf londensable PM Emission Rate, lb/hr londensable PM Emission Factor, lb/1,000 lb coke burned 0.0030 0.49 0.095 (Ccpr"r) (ERcpv) (EFcrr) 0.00069 0.10 0.019 0.0011 0. l8 0.034 0.0072 1.2 0.23 Total PM Concentration, grair/dscf Total PM Emission Rate, lb/hr Total PM Emission Factor, lb/1,000 lb coke burned 0.0061 1.0 0. 19 (Crpr',r) (ERrpu) (EFror) 0.0040 0.60 0.1 I 0.0037 0.61 0.12 0.01I 1.8 0.34 Underlined lab results contained one fraction below the detection limit; the MDL was used in calculations. 20 of60 AIffiIGe'I E fl: f"i ! i {:Al- ai R{)ti I Emission Calculations Location HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining - West Bountiful, UT Source FCCU WGS Unit 25 Project No. AST-2023-2878 Parameter PM/CPM lun Number Runl Run2 Run3 Average )ate itart Time itop Time lun Time, min 8t22t23 l5:50 l6:56 60.0 8/23t23 9:23 l0:26 60.0 8/23/23 l4:25 l5:29 60.0 60.0 VELOCITY HEAD, in. WC loint I loint 2 loint 3 loint 4 loint 5 loint 6 )oint 7 )oint 8 loint 9 loint 10 loint I I )oint l2 0.69 0.64 0.59 0.72 0.72 0.70 0.70 0.58 0.60 0.62 0.60 0.75 0.81 0.84 0.79 0.81 0.81 0.73 0.83 0.88 0.87 0.84 0.81 0.81 0.88 0.95 0.91 0.86 0.81 0.72 0.77 0.83 0.86 0.90 0.88 0.81 0.79 0.81 0.76 0.80 0.78 0.72 0.77 0.76 0.78 0.79 0.76 0.79 CALCULATED DATA iquare Root of AP, (in. WC)"' litot Tube Coefficient larometric Pressure, in. Hg Itatic Pressure, in. WC jtack Pressure, in. Hg Itack Cross-sectional Area, ft2 femperature, oF femperature, oR Vloisture Fraction Measured Vloisture Fraction @ Saturation Moisture Fraction ), Concentration, To JO2 Concentration,o/o Molecular Weight, lb/lb-mole (dry) Molecular Weight, lb/lb-mole (wet) Velocity. ff/sec (^P) (cp) (Pb) (Pe) (Ps) (As) (Ts) (Ts) (BWSmsd) (BWSsaQ (Bws) (or) (Coz) (Md) (Ms) (Vs) 0.81 I 0.840 25.50 0.40 25.53 8.73 140.3 600.0 0.178 0.231 0.178 3.03 t3.62 30.30 28.12 53.3 0.905 0.840 25.50 0.40 25.53 8.73 l4 t.8 601.5 0.169 0.240 0. r69 3.37 13.40 30.28 28.20 59.4 0.920 0.840 25.50 0.40 25.53 8.73 140.8 600.4 0.172 0.233 0.172 3.34 l 3.45 30.29 28.17 60.4 0.879 0.840 25.50 0.40 25.53 8.73 141.0 600.642 0.173 0.234 0.173 3.25 13.49 30.29 28.16 57.7 VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE A,t Stack Conditions, acfm A.t Standard Conditions. dscfm (Qa) (Os) 27,883 17.206 3 1,098 19.3 3 3 31,622 19.628 30,201 18.723 2l of60 Almmlg ' - ::.:.:,::_,:::: I****. * Method I Data $ure FCCL WGS Unlt 25 Pmid No. Dt@t W22B ' SrrI Prnmln Dd Oricilrlbtr: Vdical oxr o.,rp,--tiliii- DLtrrelm FrWr[ to Ootld.ofPod: 48.00 ir Nippt" uogrt, ---lE- rn Dcpahoflrud: 400 th Cro.rSdimrlAE.ofDud: 8.73 fi, m. or rc'r poro, -----i- ort* r,---l6l-n DLI.N A Drt D.trcn, ---!i-1murt lc'0.S1 DtlhN B: 30_0 ft DLrrm 0 Drd Dhmtc., ----i-1nu* U. ' Zy Mituh Neb.r of Tr.r.." pom', ----il-- Adhl Nuhr of Tr.vG." Pott,---]l- Nmbcr of kidhst p.r Point, ----l- Meuu$ Obitid rnd Drb),lEE_gtZz! Rcvb*Gr (Inltid md Drre\ RBB 8/22/23 a5 LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINIS Nqrtil d t@ail ?oii t n d diadq I 2 3 { 5 6 7 8 9 l0 ll 3 5 6 7 8 9 l0 ll l2 146 - 61 - 4.4 - 32 _ 2.6 _ 2.1 85 4 - 25.0 - 14.6 -- l0 5 -- a.2 - 6.7 75.0 -- 29.6 - 194 - 14.6 _ ll.8 .. .. ': ,, fi .. l'i ilil ' llfl 9t8 -- 823 97.4 __ 88.2 aPerunt of stackdioilekllroil inside \9ail to trMtt. pnil %ol DilrrN b hrid. *rll frem I J I 5 6 7 8 9 l0 ll t2 44 146 29.6 10.4 85.4 9i.6 1.76 5.84 I 1.84 28.16 34.16 18.24 916 11.84 I9 84 16. l6 42 t6 624 Shck Diagrm A=30t B= 30ft. Depth of Dur = { in. CGs Sdional ka oaaaaa Oinurbanc. 22 of 60 allmrpe1r:ci-.{xt*AL GR(]il p Cyclonic Flow Check Location HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining - West Bountiful, UT Source FCCU WGS Unit 25 Project No. AST-2023-2878 Date 08124123 Sample Point Angle (AP=0) I I 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 t2 Averaqe 4 23 of 60 #AIlaTEE lr-l :j ': Al- *,":ia)ll: Method 4Data Location HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refinins - West Bountiful, UT Source FCCU WGS Unit 25 Project No. AST-2023-2878 Parameter PIWCPM Analysis Gravimetric Run I Date: 8122123 Impinger No.,3 4 Total Contents Empty Empty H2C]Silica Initial Mass, g 491.3 64t.1 720.6 960.3 2813.3 Final Mass, g 658.0 650.0 719.2 966.1 2993.3 Gain 166.7 8.9 t.4 5.8 180.0 Run 2 Date: 8/23123 Impinger No.2 3 4 Total Contents Empty Empty H20 Silica Initial Mass, g 492.5 633.9 732.6 982.6 2841.6 Final Mass, g 661.3 640.2 733.5 995.5 3030.5 Gain 168.8 6.3 0.9 12.9 188.9 Run 3 Date: 8123123 Impinger No.)3 4 Total Contents Empty Empty H20 Silica Initial Mass, g 479.1 636.2 730.9 930.7 2776.9 Final Mass, g 644.8 651.2 733.0 944.2 2973.2 Gain 165.7 15.0 2.1 l3.5 196.3 24 of 60 fi*rAIlatrce 1' *.{: i4 ru I * A t. ft & t} 1,-; t}Isokinetic Field Data HF Sinclair Woods Cr6s Reiining - West Bountiful, Location: UTPr,",ffi Start Tire: End fire: 15:50 t656 - FCCU wGS Unit 25 AST-2023-2t7t a 6J Srmpl. Tim (minutcs) Dry Gas Meter Rcading 1tt') Pitot Tube AP (itr WC) Grs Tomnarr.urer IoFl Orificc Press. AH (iilWC) Pump V.. (in. Hg) %ISO Vs (fps) D(}M Ave Srr.k Filr.r lmn nrir Begin End lderl {cttrrl o00 500 tt Doo 0.69 72 139 68 30 4 224 211 62 12 958 54.4'7 500 000 RRd t00 73 l4l 55 30 4 233 234 51 71 049 52.54 om 500 RIR 600 0.59 73 43 40 5 219 2ll 6l 75 974 50 45 500 20 00 892 000 o7 73 40 75 70 6 227 226 6l 75 to4 2 55.68 20 00 25 OO RS5 000 n7 73 40 75 40 6 230 227 59 76 t04 I 55.68 6 2t 00 10 00 soo 000 n70 74 70 50 6 246 222 57 76 992 54.95 30 00 :15 00 903 750 o?o 74 40 70 50 6 50 184 58 '72 92.0 54.90 2 35 00 40 00 907 250 oi8 74 40 50 6 27 206 J6 74 106 2 49.98 40 00 45 00 9l 0 920 060 74 40 so 71 67 102.5 50.81 4 45.00 50.00 914 520 o62 74 40 50 (\)?7 58 98.8 5t.67 50.00 55.00 918.050 060 75 4t 46 40 (r )1 lg 5S ooo 50 87 6 55 00 50 00 921 570 075 75 t4l 83 40 6 35 26 60 97.4 56 88 Final DGM: 925100 Moisture: ,0,0 7o est. Baroretric: 2550 in. Hg Static Press: 0,40 in. WC StickPress: 2553 in. Hg CO; 16;0 Yo 02: 23 Vo N,/CO: tl.s % Md: 30.66 lb/lbrole Ms:2E.13 lb/lbaole Est. Tm: 74 Est. Ts: 140 Est. AP: 0.74 in. Est- Dn: 0.240 in. Meter Box ID: M$30 AH@(in.Wc)r 1.685 Probe ID: PR-27-OET Pitot lD: PR-27-OET Pitot Cp/Type: 0.t40 Nozle Dn (in.): 0.250 Mid I (c0 Mid 2 (cf) K CHECKI Pre Mid I Midz Mid 3 Post lzrk Rrte (cfm)r 0.020 - 0,020 rs Y: aH %rso Bws Yq. 25 of60 Isokinetic Field DatarEC-iN CAr '.]Fl(-1 I ) HF Sin l.ir Woods Cross Refining. West Bountiful, locrtion: UTO",.,@ St.rt Tim: End Tift: 9:23 l016 - rCCU wGS Unit 2s Source: AST-2023-2878 AL Sample fim (minuaes) Dry Crs Meter Re.ding (fr') Pitot Tube AP (in wC) Grs /or')Orifice Press. AH (iilWC) Pump Vac (in. Hs) % rsc Vs (rp9 DGM Av.rro.Str.&Filr.r Imn Eril Begin End Iderl Acttrrl 0.00 5.00 941 865 0.81 7t l4l 95 200 E 254 246 55 70 104 I 59.1 1 5.00 t0.00 946 080 0.84 72 l4l 03 200 E 251 252 49 72 999 60.20 3 10.00 15.00 950.210 0.79 72 t42 9t 1.90 7 253 245 73 l0l 0 58.42 I 5.00 20.00 954.256 0.81 74 142 96 190 7 2s5 251 49 72 94.0 59. l6 20m ?5 00 958.078 0.81 74 t42 96 190 8 254 53 75 100 4 59. t6 25.00 30.00 962 t65 0.73 74 142 71 1.80 I 246 253 58 76 100.0 56. l6 oo0 15 00 s66 010 oR3 7 0t 2.00 1 253 62 77 100. I 59 89 5m 40 00 97n I t7 ORR 75 7 to 7lq )so 5t 1\917 6t 66 40 00 a5 00 974 215 1 15 tt)) to )4 ,5 1\qfl,61 3t 4 45 00 50 00 974 421 084 76 147 o4 AM a!5 246 74 sgl 60 25 5 50 00 55 00 982 545 OR 75 147 97 s0 258 2S "l 75 IO0 7 59. r6 6 5l oo 60 00 986.660 0.8 t 77 142 91 L90 I 254 250 5'l 76 I 04.5 59. l6 Finel DGM: 990.940 tnFI =thc Run Tim Vm AP Tm Ts Y"' aH %lso Bws Y..Vrc 60.0 mn 49-075 fc 0.82 in. WC 74.O oF t4l.t ll 1.95E in. WC 96.3 0.169 -0.1 STACK DATA Meter Box lD: M5-30 AH @ (in.WC): 1.6E5 Probe lD: PR-27-OET Pitot ID: PR-27-OET Pitor Cp/Type: 0,t40 Nozle Do (in.): 0.250 Moisturc: 20.0 7o est. Baroreiric: 2550 in. Hg Static Prcss: 0,40 in. wC Stack Prcss: 2553 in. Hg COr: 16.0 7. O2t 25 lo Ny'CO: tr.s % Md: f,0.66 lb/lb-mole Msr 2t.13 lb/lb-mole Pb: 2550 in. Hg Pg: 0.40 in. WC O2t ,31 Yo COr: 13.ll() % Est. Tm: 74 Est. Ts: 140 Est. AP: 0,66 in. WC Esl- Dn: 0-221 in K CHECKI PE Mid t Mid 2 Mid 3 Posl Mid I (cf) Mid 2 (cf)lzrk Rrre (cfn)r 0.010 - 0.0t2 Vrcuum (in Hc): l2 - ll 26 of 60 ffid AlAnoe"r${: H t* i {:,a"1 &$1* L i3 Isokinetic Field Data HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining - W.st Bountiful, Location: UTou,",@ Strrt Tim: End Tim: l4:25 152' - FCCU WGS Unil 25 Project No.: AST-2023'2E7t PM/CPM S.mplc Tim (dinut s) Dry Grs Meter Reading tt'l Pitot Tube AP (ih WC) Grs T.mnerrttrres (oF'l Orificc Prcss. AH (in. wC) Pump Vrc (in. Hs) Grs'lemmratures ("! ) % IS(Vs (fps) DGM Av.rir. Strck Probe nilter Imo Eilt Aux Bcsin End Ideal 000 500 994 400 0.88 8I l4t l6 2.20 1 ,5 t )45 6)74 005 61.61 500 t0 00 994 720 0.95 82 l4l )40 jg )tn 5R 7 05 1 64.02 6 t000 l5 00 001.420 0 9l 82 t4l )A ))n )5 ?)9 sl 7 989 62.65 4 l5 00 20 00 007.750 0.86 83 2 to ,|2S 241 6t 70 971 60.91 5 20 00 25 00 920 0.81 84 4l 00 7m 1 )t 745 62 72 935 59.11 6 25.00 30.00 800 o72 84 to 7R 180 230 245 61 '73 965 55.68 30.00 35.00 9.580 n11 R1 tal 90 r90 9 250 255 65 75 98.3 5't.63 2 35.00 40.00 sso ot1 Rr'4l 05 2lo 9 245 241 66 71 t09 3 59 84 40 00 45 00 o?R I do o86 81 4t 2to 9 250 257 64 79 98.2 60 9t 500 50 00 2 130 ogo AA 40 223 220 9 245 266 63 80 965 57 26 50 00 55 00 035 550 0fl8 84 4t 217 220 9 236 263 64 80 06.4 6l 6l 6 55.00 60.00 t04t 150 0.81 84 40 0l 2.00 8 237 256 66 83 986 59 06 Fin,l DGM: 1045.245 aFJ q El Run Tim Vm AP Tm rs U: aH %rso Bws Yo, 60.0 50.845 ft'o-ts in- WC t3.2 oF r40, oF 9 2.100 in. WC 96.1 0.172 -0.8 Est. Tm: 74 Est. Ts: 142 Est AP: 0.62 in. WC Est Dn: 0.209 in. Meter Bor ID: M930 AH @ (in.wc): r.6t5 Probc ID: PR-27-OET Pitot lD: PR-27-OET Pitot Cp/Type: 0.E40 Nozzle Dn (in.): 0.250 Moisture : 20.0 oZ est B.roretrici 25.50 in. Hg Static Press: 0.40 in. WC Stack Pressi 25.53 in. Hg CO2t 16.0 Yo o2: 25 Yo Ny'CO: El.s % Md: 30.56 lb/lb-mole Ms: 2E.ll lb/lb-mole Pb: 2550 in Hg Pg: 0.40 in WC Or: 3.34 '/o Mid I (c0 Mid 2 (cf) Mid 3 (cf) L.k Rrt€ (cfm)r 0.010 - 0.005 V.cuum (in Hs): l0 - I I 27 of 60 28 of60 Allionce Technicol Group, LLC Anolyticol Services 5530 Morsholl St. Arvodo, CO 80002 (720) 457-e s04 www.ollioncetg.com Anolyticol Loborotory Report HF Sincloir Woods Cross Refining. LLC 1070 West 500 South West Bountiful, UT 84087 Project No. AST-2023-287 B t*T,,llruliudd1;r ErlYll)tZl"l:-'"'r::i-:-:---'_--''l'rl i^li ciT 1 1 ".ir3 t' __ll ,,r,t,o* oF AIR qlya- i wre 'i:.'li tii;.i: 1 ot21 Certificotion Stotement Allionce Source Testing, LLC (AST) hos completed the onolysis os described in this report. Results opply only to the source(s) tested ond operoting condition(s) for the specific lest dote(s) ond time(s) identified within this report. All resulls ore inlended lo be considered in their entirely, ond AST is nol responsible for use of less thon the complete test repori without written conseni. This report sholl not be reproduced in full or in port without written opprovol from the customer. To the best of my knowledge ond obilities, oll informotion, focts ond tesl doto ore conect. Doto presented in this report hos been checked for completeness ond is occurote, error-free ond legible. Any deviolions or problems ore detoiled in the relevont seclions on the test report. This document wos prepored in portoble document formot (.pdf) ond contoins poges os identified in the bottom footer of this document. Volidotion Signoture The onolyticoldoto ond ollQC contoined within this report wos reviewed ond volidoted by the following individuol. James Davidson Jomes Dovidson Quolity Assuronce Associote qlbry i$.d by J.m.. D.vBon Df, ig-Us, CN-J.ft3 frv*.n, Eai m.3d.ve.@*cb*@m i..an: l.(.nt. tu.@r.cy.nd inqrry olhl. dodmnl b*.: your *nins bdrion h.,. sL:)o809a 17:a7tGosm',Db: 2023.09.4 17:{hGosqfttrbF Edior V.Eion:11 2.7 Dote 30 of 60 2ot21 MDL Proiect Nonotive Anolyticol Method(s): Method 5 - Determinolion of Porticulote Motter Emissions From Stotionory Sources Method 2O2 - Dry lmpinger Method for Determining Condensoble Porticulote Motter Emissions From Stotionory Sources Filleroble The filier(s) were either oven dried qnd/or desiccoted per the method until o finol weight wos obtoined. The liquid froctions were extrocted if required, evoporoied ond cooled until o finol weight wos obtoined. These froctions were summed together to provide the totol Poriiculote Motter collected. Condensoble The filter(s) were extrocted per the melhod. The orgonic extroct wos odded to the orgonic rinse, ond the inorgonic extroct wos odded to the inorgonic rinse. The inorgonic froction wos extrocted with solvent per the method. Extrocts were combined with the orgonic rinse. The orgonic ond inorgonic froctions were evoporoted ond desiccoted until o finol weight wos obioined. The Minimum Detection Level (MDL) is 0.5 mg per froction. lf the meosured result for o froction is less ihon the MDL, the MDL wos used in ensuing colculotions. Blonk Conection lf blonk correction is performed, only blonk volues returned higher thon the MDL qre used. lf o blonk returns o volue less thon the MDL, no correction is included. Custody: The somples were received by Cory Monshock on9l612023 in Arvodo, CO. The somples were received in good condition with proper Choin-of-Custody documentolion. No opporent contoiner problems were noted upon receipt. Prior to onolysis, the somples were kept secure with occess limited lo outhorized personnel of AST. Number of Somples: 26 Lobeling: Acceptoble Anolyst: Ryon Gilleti - Loborolory Anolyst ll Cory Monshock - Loborotory Anolyst ll Eric Grosieon - Technicol Director Equipment: Metiler Toledo Bolonce ML-I04, SN B2l 7893065. Ihis scole wos used for onqlyticol deierminotions of filters ond rinse vessels. Denver lnstruments Bolonce T8-6201, SN I 7904189. This scole wos used to meosure the totol moss of rinse collected for blonk correction. Anolysis wos performed on ihe some bolonce os the ossocioted tore. Quincy Lob lnc oven, 30CG, SN G3-01 2673. Lob Reogents: Acetone Lot Number: 224472 Hexone Lot Number: 221219 QC Notes: The somples met the minimum criterio estoblished by the relevont method. A blonk correction wos opplied per the method. Reporting Notes: M5l2O2 - Unit 25 - Run I Cont. I wos torn ond missing pieces upon receipt possibV occouniing for the slightly negotive volue 3l of60 3of21 Cllent Alialrce cilY stote raailN:.i^r onouF PaojeclNo. lielhod HF Sincloi w@ds Cross Refining, LLC west Eountiful, UT 84087 AST-2023-2878 EPA Method 5 Fronl Holf Rller Lob lD D36069 036074 D36079 tlcld lI M5/202 - Unit 25 - Run I Cont. l M5/202 - Unit 25 - Run 2 Cont. I M5/2O2 - unil 25 - Run 3 Conl. l tllle, ll t6566 - C 16602 - C t6744 - C tlll., Tore Wolghl, g 0.5t3t 5 0.5r r35 0.47 400 Dole - Detlccolor 9t5t23 9/5t23 9/s/23 Ilmo . Dorlccolo 4:40 4140 4:40 Dol. ol Welghlng 9/6t23 9 I 6t23 9 t6t23 9t6/23 9t6/23 9t6/23 nme ol welghlhg 4143 ll:07 43 ll:07 4:43 I l:05 tllter Welght, !0.51 25 0.5r 25 0.5r 65 0.5r 57 0.4803 0.4802 Flller PItl M6s. mg'0.50 5.3)6.25 trohl Holl Rlnre Lob lD D36070 D36075 D36080 field ll M5/202 - tjnit 25 - Run I Cont. 2 M5/202 - Unit 25 - Run 2 Conl.2 M5/202 - Unit 25 - Run 3 Conl.2 Sedker ll 320r8 3201 9 32022 Eeoker rore, g 3.86960 3.874r0 3.93265 Eeoker wllh Acelone, !125.0 I 15.6 29.5 Ac.lon. rtlorr, r t2l.t ]] 1.7 25.6 Dole - Derlccolo 9t7 t23 9t7 t23 917t23 Ilme - Darlccqlor 3r57 3:57 3t57 Dqte ol lY.lghlng 9t8t23 9 t8t23 9t8/23 9/8/23 9/8/23 9t8t23 llm. ol lY.lghlhg 4r33 l0:40 4:33 l0:40 4:33 l0:40 Welshl. s 3.a776 3.a777 3.8761 3.8765 3.9363 Rlnr. PM ,tlorr, mg'8.05 2"n 3.6S gqnk Co.r.cl.d No Iolol Prri Mo.3, m!8.55 7.n 9.90 *The lolol resulls hove been colculoted bosed on MDL volues for ony somple lrociions which were below lhe MDL. 32 of 60 4of21 lF Sincloi w@dr Crcss Refining, LLC ilest Bountiful, UT 84087 A$-n23-2878 EPA Melhod 5 Ac.loh. Sldhk tqb ll D36@4 Fl.ld ll MS Acetone Blonk B.ok.r ll 31 984 Baqkar lqra. (3.9791 B.ok rwllhAcaton..r I 64.88 Ac.lon. Mq3t, I I 60.90 Ddle . Dalccolo ,t7n3 Ilino - Deiqcdtoi 3:57 Ooi. of Wdghlng 9t8123 9t8tB Ilm. of W.lghlng 4:33 l0:,lO W.lght, g 3.9794 3.9796 Elqnk Mc$, mg'0.0 33 of60 5ot21 Clien mffirm,J"',:: Melho( HF Sincloir w@ds Cross Refining. LLC wesl Eounliful. uT 84087 ASt-20232878 EPA Melhod 202 Iellon tllter Lob ll D3607r D36076 D36@r Fl.ld lt M5/202 - Unil 25 - Run I Conl.3 M5/202 - Unil 25 - Run 2 Cont. 3 M5/202 - Unit 25 - Run 3 Cont. 3 Orgonic Frocllon Lob lt D36073 D36078 D36@3 flcld lt M5/202 - Unit 25 - Run 1 Conl. 5 M5/202 - Unit 25 - Run 2 Conl. 5 M5/n2 - Vnil 25 - Run 3 Conl. 5 Beok.r l(320t I 3201 3 320r6 B.ok.r lqrc. (3.94660 3.89735 3.88525 g.qkar SolYanl. (38.6 300 Solv.nl Morr, r 21.3 u.7 26.1 Dql.. Derlccqlo 9 t7 123 9 t7t23 9 t7 t23 TIm.. De.lccdlo 12t51 l2:51 l2:51 Oolc otWCghlnt 9tat23 9t11 t 9ta/23 9/11123 9tat23 9t11t nme ol welohln(12156 5:06 l2:56 5:06 12i56 5:06 welghl, {3.9493 3.9492 3.9000 3.900r 3.&384 3.888s Orgonlc PM Mq$, mg 2.65 2.70 3.20 lnorgqnlc frqcllon Lqb lI D36072 036077 D36082 ti.ld lI M5/202 - Unil 25 - Run I Conl.4 M5l2O2 - Unil 25 - Run 2 Conf. 4 M5/202 - Unit 25 - Run 3 Conl- 4 Baqkar ll 3r 345 3r 390 31385 8eok.r lor., t 73. tm60 77.04045 78.7m35 Bcoker Wolcr. .28€.2 357.9 465.3 Wqlcr Motr, (215.1 280.9 386.6 Dqle. Derlccolo 9t7 t23 9 t7 t23 9/7123 TImc -I 5:35 l5:35 l5:35 Dolc ol w.lohln(9/t | /23 9/1v 9^ I t23 9^1t23 9t12t23 9 I 12t23 Ilmr ot Wclqhln(5i12 I t28 5:12 I l:28 4:33 I 100 lvclght, a 73.1049 73.1045 77.0429 77.0426 78.7196 78.72@ gqnlc Mor3, mg't.'t0 2.30 t 9.45 Blohk Cor.clec Yes Ioiol PM Mqis. m(1.75 3.00 20.55 'All frqctions were onolyzed ond relumed volues greoterlhon the MDL of 0.5 mg 34 of60 6of21 Clty, Siote Pro.l.ct No. Mclhod 1F Sinclqir w@ds Cross Retining, LLC rye* Bounliful, UI 84087 \sT-2023-2878 :PA Melhod 202 Tcton tlller Blonkr Flcld Troln Elqnk Proot Bldnk Lob lt D36087 N/A Hcld ll M202 FI Recovery Blonk Cont.3 Orgqnlc frocllon Blonkt Fl.ld Troln Blohk P.@t Blqnk Lob lt D36089 D36086 Field ll M202 FI Recovery Blqnk Cont. 5 M2O2 FT Pr@f Blonk Conl. 5 Beqker lI 3r999 31977 Beok r lore, (3.90430 3.96045 Scokar Solvenl, r 20.0 Solvcnl Moss, 1 29.6 r 6.0 Dolc. ocalccdlo 9/7t23 9t6t nm. - Detlccql,o I 2:51 I 5:46 Dqle ol W.lqhlnr 9/8t23 9lll 123 9/7 t23 9 t8/23 Tlm. of Wclqhln(12i56 506 16i27 4:30 W.lght, i 3.906r 3.9062 3.9623 3.9623 Orgqnlc Mq$. mg'1.85 't.85 lnorgqnic trqcllon llonk3 R.ld Troln Blonk Prool Blqnk Lqb lt D36088 D36085 Fl.ld lE M202 FI Recovery Blqnk Cont.4 M202 FI Pr@f Blonk Cont. 4 B.ok.r lI 3r 378 31380 B.qk.r lqrc, G 89.86200 75.58395 Bcoker Woler c 205.9 172.5 Wqle. Mor3, !I t6.0 96.9 Dqle - Desiccolor 9 t7 t23 9t6/n Iime - Deslccqlor I 5:45 Ddla ot weldhln.9/12/X 9/12/23 9/7t23 9tat23 Tlm. ot Weldhlh.4:33 r ro0 16i27 4:30 Welghl c 492627 89.8627 75.5447 75.fi45 lnorqonlc Mqi!. mqr 0.70 0.65 35 of60 7 ot21 o .l ' )L i l , r . ) l l/ 3 u ( ) 1 . 1 ) v .) i r r l l li l i ) A l ( ) Z4$, \ <{ r FI : tt - qIa,l ILtttt ,hIlr II 'i r I i{t6.- tJrlrl* I$B, 2i fl ; :l !#t' ,+ i Iil it ' l jl r .l l . ) l \ r J nl ( l l( r , i r I {. 1 - l i u 1 tr ., il l , r y\ ( l c )[ i r : , ) ) v :l s r J r ] . ! ;; r l l au o t e l , V )i u r u 0t -: i f\ ( J )t i a r j a : ; \ / - ,i i l l H t) l .: ,^ { /l , r , r i i . ) uJ L U l t , ra [ . r n f . ] rl r l , ;' J ( ) l i ) . : V ;) S U l ) l rl 1 . : 0 N l J{ : a ra q u . r { ra g ra t l l 2 a( r c l l a . i v - ai r , r r i l i) l / 7 o 1 . zl J e n ) ru r i J 1: li ! : l r L r n f l Je . l : !I), Jr ^ ) 1 , , . ) V O: U l / l i) l l l r . r l ! .) t l i c ro l ti , :, . al ,, i- ! i: ! ir.a i aJ it l f. l i, I i' ; i' , 't_la: ,l )a ,! , *_a: p ,! (: ) ). I!l !-1 I DoiPE. 2? Sr ia .t F: :.!! l !oOe Oo J5 t- t F t.Os -C(6 g U[' ii i 0 . . r$ l Ii l(' 36 of 60 Callbraton Cer$frcab !D NA1 548-038-030823-ACC-USL MetUerToledo, LLC 1900 Polaris Parkway Columbus, OH43240 l.8OO.METTLER Customer -*]V?, Accredited by the American Association ffi 1& n forLaboraroryAccreditarion(MlA) -'ri.- l.-i f AEenffi p:l cAL I B RArl oN cE Rr #'r 788.0 I 'rr.t.ild' METTLTR TOLEOO ISO 17025Accredited ANSUNCSL 254G,1 Accredited Accuracy Calibration Certifi cate Company: Alliance Source Testing Address: ctv: Welghlng Device 5530 Marshall St Arvada Contact Eric Grosjean .* Zp, Pcbl: 80002-3108 Stab / Prwlnce: Colorado Manuf;ecfur6c Metder Toledo lvlodel:ML104/03 Sedal No.: 8217893065 lnsttment Typ€: weighing lnstrument Ass€tNumb€n N/A Termlnal Model: N/A Terminal Sorial l,lo.: N/A TerminalAasot No.: N/A Building: Floor Room: 5520 1 120 g 0.0001 g Prccedure Calibralbn Guldellno: METILER TOLEDO Work lnatuc{on: ASTM E898.20 30260953 v1.61 This calibration certificate including procedures and uncertainty estimation also c-mplies with EURAMET cgF18 v 4.0. This calibration certificate contains measurements for As Found and As L€ft calibrations. The sensitivity/span of the weighing instrument was adjusted before As Left calibration with a built-in weight. ln accordance with EURAMET cg-18 (1nU5'), the test loads were selected to reflect the specific use of the weighing device or to accommodate specific calibration conditions. As Found Star[ 21.1 'C End:20.9'C Start: 21 .0 % End: 21 .0 o/o As Left Star[20.8'C End:20.7'C Start 21.0 % End:20.0 o/o Environmental @nditions have been verified to ensure the accuracy of the calibrat!on. This certificate is issued in accordance with the conditions of accreditation granted by A2LA, which is based on ISO/IEC 17025. A2LA has assessed the measurement capability of the laboratory and its traceability to recognized national standards. As Found Callbratbn Im: 08-Mar2023 As L€ft Calibralion Dato: lssue Date: 08-Mar-2023 08-Mar-2023 R€qu€sbd Noxt Callbration Oab: 31-Mar-2024 Authodzed A2tA Slgnabry: Chris Carson Soft\rde VeBion: 1.23.1.70 Repod VeEion: 2.16.32 Fom Numberi AF1702111.0 O METTLER TOLEDO This is an original d@ument and may not be parlially roproduced without the written permission ofth€ issuing elibration laboratory. Page 1 of 5 I ot 2'l 17 of60 Calibration C€rtificato lD NA1 548-038-030823-ACC-USL MTTTLER TOLTDO $i*rvi** Measurement Results Repeatability T€st Load: 100 g l 2 i roo.ooozg _|,-*,*loo,ggggl_-;i--.--l-'- looroors -1"-- ,ofiooo;- 1 i_,0,,i _19,0:9991-s- I to_q,9900q_ ii s I roo.ooorn I 1oo.ooo1n ] ;r As Found ]''''@oAslen Poi999"e_*_,j 99.9999 s , I {lestPoinll:& 2d- ..1&-l a 4d 3d 1 00.0002 g ..t '. ',.?' l.-'1r , 1..ll ,... r il 6 The "d" in the graph represenb the readability of the range,/intorval in which the test was perfomed. The results of this graph are based upon lhe absolute values of the differen@s from the mean value. Eccentidty Test Load:50 g I I ! Max[num I Irevlalbn : 0.0001 g The "d" in the graph represents the readability of the Gnge/interual in which the test was performed. As Found As Lffi Software Ve6ion: 1.23.1.70 Report Ve6ion: 2.16.32 Fom Number: AF1702Lil.0 @ METTLER TOLEDO This is an original document and may not be pa.tially reproduced without lhe written permission of th6 issuing €libration laboratory. Page 2 of 5 10 ol2'l 38 of60 Calibrdion C€rlificab lD NAI 548-038-030823-ACC-USL METTTER TOTEDO S*rw*** Enorof lndlca0on As Found 1 N/A 0.0000 g 0.0000 g 0.0000 g 0.18 mg 2 2 N/A 20.0000 g 20.0002 g 0.0002 g 0.22 mg 2 3 2os 20.0000 s 20.0002 g 0.0002 s 0.22m9 2 4 40s 20.0000 g 20.0001 g 0.0001 g 0.22 mg 2 5 60s 20.0000 g 20.0001 g 0.0001 g 0.22m9 2 6 80g 20.0000 g 20.0001 s 0.0001 s 0.22m9 2 7 N/A 60.0000 g 60.0001 g 0.0001 g 0.35 mg 2 8 N/A 100.0000 g 100.0003 g 0.0003 g 0.49 mg 2 I N/A 1 19.9999 s 120.0002 s 0.0003 g 0.59 mg 2 As Ld 1 NiA 0.0000 g 0.0000 g 0.0000 g 0.18 mg 2 2 NiA 20.0000 g 20.0000 g 0.0000 g 0.20 mg 2 3 2og 20.0000 g 20.0000 g 0.0000 s 0.20 mg 2 4 40g 20.0000 g 20.0000 g 0.0000 g 0.20 mg 2 5 60g 20.0000 g 20.0000 g 0.0000 g 0.20 mg 2 6 80g 20.0000 s 20.0000 s 0.0000 s 0.20 mg 2 7 N/A 60.0000 g 60.0000 g 0.0000 s 0.24 mg 2 8 NiA 100.0000 g 100.0001 g 0.0001 g 0.27 mg 2 I N/A 1 19.9999 s 120.0001 s 0.0002 g 0.32 mg 2 I 'r o E c o.9p -s o o ru c 5; $-i i 5'' i; As Found a Ast'eft For improved legibility of the graphis only inoeasing m€asurement points are shown and measurement points close to zero are not displayed. 6l Calibrstion Points [gl The uncertainty stated is the expanded uncertainty at calibration obtained by multiplying the standard combined uncertainty by the coverage factor k - which can be larger than 2 according to ASTM E898 and EURAMET cg-18. The value oflhe measurand lies within the assigned range of values with a probability of approximately 957o. The user is responsible for maintaining environmental conditions and the settings of the weighing instrument when it was calibrated. Sofrwde VeBion: 1.23.1.70 Report Ve6ion: 2.16.32 Fom Number: AF'1702tr1.O @ METTLER TOLEDO This is an original d@ument and may not be pa.tially rEproduced without the writtEn pgrmi$ion of thg issuing €libration laboEtory. Page 3 of 5 11 of21 39 of60 Calibration C€dficat€ lD NA1 s48-038-030823-ACC-USL MffnER TOTEDO $*rvi** Test Equlpment All weights used for metrological testing are traceable to national or international standards. The weights were calibrated and certilied by an accredited calibration laboratory. Welght Set 1: OIML E2 Weight Set No.: Certificate Number Remarks 421 Date of lssue:07-Dee2O22 Calibration Oue Date: 31-Decr20232206353/.$1 Value of the built-in weight adjusted Performed a linearity adjusbnent End ot Accr€dlted Socdon The information below and any attachments to this calibration certificate are not part of the accredited calibration. Software VeBion: 1.23.1.70 Report VeEion: 2.16.32 Fom Numb€r: AF1702Lrl.0 O METTLER TOLEOO This is an original document and may not be partially reproduced w(hout the writt€n permission ol lh€ issuing calibration laboEtory. Page 4 of 5 12 ot 21 40 of60 Callbraton Cedfcab lD NA1 548-038-030823-ACC-USL METTHR TOLEDO Servic* Measurcment Uncertainty of the Welghlng lnstument ln Use Stated is the expanded uncertainty with k=2 in use. The formula shall be used for the estimation of the uncertainty under consideration of the errors of indication. The value R represents the net load indication in the unit of measure of the device. Temperature coefficient for the evaluation of th6 measurement uncertainty in use: Temperature range on site for the evaluation of the measurement uncertainty in use: LhearLaton of Uncortilnty Equatbn 2.0. 10-6 tK To optimize the stabilaty of the linearization, besides of the zero load only increasing measurement points with a test load of 5% of the measurement range or larger are taken for the calculation of the linear equation. Abeofub and Rebihro Moasurrmont UncsrElnty ln Use br Varbus N€t lrdhador|s (Examplos) 4K E > .6 8) ,! r*-- I I i : i.-.. .....: I Wlrgh,ng Range na} As Fouard Ar k{t *1 1 Re.ding tgl 3 *1 Software V€Bion: 'l .23. 1 .70 Report Vecion: 2. I 6.32 Fom Numberi AF1702111,0 O METTLER TOLEDO fhis is an original dGument and may not be pariially reproduced without the writtsn psrmlsslon of th€ issuing calibration laboEtory. Page 5 of 5 13 ot 21 4l of60 Atiechrnent b Cellbretbn C€ftfi caig: NA,I Manufacturer Tolerance Assessmenl METTTER TOLE0O $*rv*nm Man ufactu rer Tolerance Assessment Assessment done without considering measurement uncertainty. The measurements from the attached calibration certificate were assessed against METTLER TOLEDO tolerances defined in SOP'Test and Measurement Procedures for METTLER TOLEDO balances, Oocument: 10000018502. Overall As Left ./ { { ./ ,l Measurement Results Repeatability As Found { ,/ { { N/A Repeatability Eccentricity Linearity Sensitivity Tolt Load: l0O g S-brdad Ilada[on 0.00000 g 0.qXD8 g Tolerarrce o.om10 g {0.000109 { Software Ve6ion: I 23.'1.70 Rgport VgBion:2.16,32 Fom Number AF1702111.0 O METTLER TOLEDO This is an original document and may not be !6dally rGprodu@d without the written p€mi$ion oI th€ issuing €libration laboElory. Page 1 of 2 14 ol2'l 42 of6o Altachment b Calibrafon Cert'ficab: NA1 548-038-030823-ACC-USL Manufacturer Tolerance Assessment METilER TOTEDO $*nvirs Eccentricity Tost Load:50 g The maximum deviation is determined as the absolute value of the largest deviation from the center. Llnearity - Difierental Method As Found The As Found Sensitivity Tolerance is only valid if the device has been adjusted before the tesl As Lelt .lnearity Devlatlon 0.00012 o -lnearlty Tol€rance o.ooo2s { -lnearlty Devlauon 0.00000 o -lnearlty Tolo.anca o.ooo2s { The values in column 'Deviation' and the "Linearity Deviation" . This point was used to satisfy the sensitivity requirement. lensitivity Oevieuon 0.0003 s l.nslflvlly To16ranc6 N/A !anrltlvlty Devlaton 0.0001 s S.nrltivlty Tolerance o.oooss { are zero point offset and s6nsitivity enor compensated. Softwars Vo.sion: t.23.1.70 Rspod VeBlon:2.16.32 Fom Numbq: AF1702I/1,0 6 METTLER TOLEOO This is an odginal d@urent and may rct be partially ,eprodu@d without the written pomission of th€ issuing €lib.ation laboratory. Page 2 ot 2 15 of 21 43 of60 CallbraUon Cedfrcab lD NA1 548-039-030823-ACC-USL M6t[orTol6do, LLC 1900 Polaris Parkway Columbus, OH 43240 l.8OO.METTLER Customer .*'.*SZ1r, Accredited by the American Association |P| n :. forLaboratoryAccreditation (A2LA) -zi.a},.s cALlBRArloN cERr#1788.01 'rt.t,ilr' MffTtTR TOTEDO ISO 17025 Accredited ANSUNCSL 254G.1 Accredited Accu racy Gal i bration Gertificate Company: Addrees: Clty: ZjplPorfotr,: Slab / Pmvlnce: Welghlng Devlce Alliance Source Testing 5530 Marshall St Arvada Contact Eric Grosjean 80002-3108 Colorado Manuhctrec luodel: Sedal No.: Building: Floot: Room: Denver T84201 lnstumentType: Asset Number Terminal Modal: Terminal Serial No.: TerminalAssot No.: Weighing lns{yAet N/A 17904189 N/A 5520 Lab Prccedure Calibratbn Guldeline: METIIER TOTEDO Work lmtucdon: ASTM E898.20 30260953 v1.61 This calibration certificate including procedures and uncertainty estimation also complies with EURAMET cgF18 v 4.0. This calibration cerlificate contains measurements for As Found and As Left calibrations. The sensitivity/span of the weighing instrument was adjusted before As Left calibration with a built-in weight. ln accordance with EUMMET cg-18 (11/2015), the test loads were selected to rellect the specific use of the weighing device or to accommodate specific calibration conditions. As Found Start20.8'C End:20.5'C Start 20.0 o/o End: 2'1.0 o/o As Lefl Start 20.1 'C End:20.1 'C Start: 20.9 o/o End:21.0 % Environmental conditions have been verified to ensure the accuracy of the calibration. This certificate is issued in accordance with the conditions of accreditation granted by A2[A, which is based on ISO/IEC 17025. paLA has assessed the measurement capability of the laboratory and its traceability to recognized national standards. AB Found Callbratbn Oato: As Left Calibraton Dab: lssue Date: Roquesbd i{ext Callbra0on Dab: 08-Mar-2023 Autlodzod A2LA Slgnabry:/:r;'z::---\08-Mar-2023 08-Mar-2023 Chds Carson 31-Mar-2O24 Sofrwee Ve6ionr 1.23.1.70 Report Ve6ion: 2.16.32 Fom Numb6r: 4F1702t 1.0 € METTLER TOLEDO fhis is an original d@urent and may mt be partially reproducod without the wrltton p€mission ol th€ issuing calibration hboratory. Page 1 of 4 16 ot 21 44 of 60 Callbrdm Certificate lD NAI s48-039430823-ACC-USL METTTER TOTEDO $*rvi** Measurement Resulb Repeatability Test Load:20q) g 1 1999.9 g 2000.0 g 2 1999.9 g 2000.0 9 3 1999.9 s 2000.0 s 4 1999.9 g 2000.0 g E 1999.9 g 2000.0 g 6 1999.9 s 2000.0 s # As Found o As Left J 4 Th6'd'ln the graph represents the readability ofthe rang€/interval in which th€ test was perfomed. The results of this graph are based upon the abslute values of the differen€s faom the mean value- Eccenkiclty T€st l-oad:2000 g Maxlnumiffi;'l 0.,s I o.1s The "d" in the graph represents the readability of the €nge/interual in which the test was performed. Enor of lndication As Found A3t'ft As Found 1 o.o g o.o g o.o g 0.06 g 2 2 't000.0 g 999.9 g -0.1 s 0.09 g 2 3 3000.0 g 2999.9 g -0.1 g 0.12 g 2 4 4000.0 s 3999.8 s -o'2 g 0.14 g 2 5 6000.0 g 5999.8 g 4.29 0.19 g 2 45 of60 Soft\f,are Ve6ion: r,23.1.70 Repon VeFion: 2.16.32 Fom Numb€r: AF1702111.0 @ METTLER TOLEOO This b an original d@ument and may not be partially reproduced without the written p€rmission of th6 issuing alibratioh laboaiory. Page 2 ol 4 17 ot 21 Calibration C€rlificato lD NAI 548-039{30823-ACC-USL METTTER TOLEDO S*nvr** As L6fr 1_ ! 5 0.06 g 0.09 g 3000.0 g 0.12 g 4000.0 g 4000.0 g 0.14 g 6000.0 9 6000.1 g 0.19 g i3 As Found o esut For improved legibility of the graphi6 only increasing measuremenl points are shown and measurement points close lo zero are not displayed. -j (-i rcr, 30iir {.ce --;i;;-''- Calibration Points lgl The uncertainty stated is the expanded uncertainty at calibration obtained by multiplying the standard combined uncertainty by the coverage factor k - which can be larger than 2 according to ASTM E898 and EURAMET cg-'18. The value of the measurand lies within the assigned range of values with a probability of approximately 95o/o. The user is responsible for maintaining environmental conditions and the settings of the weighing instrument when it was calibrated. Test Equipment All weights used for metrological testing ar6 traceable to national or international standards. The weights were calibrated and certified by an accredited calibration laboratory. v .9 a p .,- o o U '',r- Weight S€t 1: OIML F'l Weight Set No.: Certificate Number: Remarks 685 Date of lssue: Calibration Due Date: 12-Jan-2023 2206/.2893-1 31-Jan-2025 N/A End of Accr€dltsd Socdon The information below and any attachments to this calibration certiticate are not part of the accredited calibration. Sofrwae VeEion: 1.23.1.70 Report VeEion: 2.16.32 Fom Number: AF1702u1.0 @ METTLER TOLEDO fhis is an original d@ument and may not be partially reproduced without the written permission ot the issuing calibration laboratory. Page 3 of 4 18 ot 21 46 of60 Calbratbn Certfcate lD NA'l s48-039{)30823-ACC-USL MffnER TOLTDO $ervi** Measurcment Uncertalnty of the Welghlng lnshrment ln Use Stated is the expanded uncertainty with k=2 in use. The formula shall be used for the estimation of the uncertainty under consideration of the errors of indication. The value R represents the net load indication in the unit of measure of the device. Temperature coefiicient for the evaluation of th€ measurement uncertainty in use: Temperature range on site for the evaluadon of the measurement uncertainty in use: Un€arEatm of Un6rtalnty Equato.r 6.0.106/K 6K To optimize the stabilaty of the linearization, besides of the zero load only increasing measurement points with a test load of 5% of the measurement range or larger are taken for the calculation of the linear equation. Absolub and Rehtlve Meaaurcrnent Uncarhlnty ln Use for Varbw Nd lrdhatlons (Examples) l:l Bar 5t75 wergt$o Rr.g3 [t{l ; "'- iit , ! i I ..,q:, ' I ) a t cf, r u il As Found a1 As bfr Sofiware Vedo: 1.23.,l.70 Report VeBbn: 2.'16.32 Fom Number: AF1702Lr1.0 O METTLER TOLEDO This is an original deument and may not be parlially .gp.oduced withoul the written p€mission of the issuinq €libration laboratory. Page 4 of 4 19 of 21 47 of 60 AtrhdrrEnt b CalibrEtbn C€rtficab: NAI 548-039{30823-ACC-USL Cuslom Tolerance Assessment M$THR TOLEDO $mrurl** Custom Toleran@ Assessment Assessment done without considering measurement uncertainty. One or more of the measurements from the attached calibration certificate were assessed against customer-defined tolerances. As Found { As Left { { { { "/ ,/ n Overall Repeatability Eccentricity Error of lndication Measurcment Resulb Repeatablllty Teet l-oad:2(XD 9 Sterdard Devlaton 0.00 g 0.00 g Toleram 0.109 if 0.109 ,/ Eccentidty Teet Load:2fi10 g Ma,*num D6rla0on o.'l c o.l c Tohlanoe 0.3g {O.3S ./ Softwaro VeEion:'t 23.1.70 Reporl vsBio:2.1632 Fom Numbd AF1702LI1.0 @ METTLER TOLEDO This is an original d@ument and may not be pa.tially reprcduced without the writt6n pomision of th€ issuing 6lib6tion laboEtory. Page 1 ol 2 20 of21 48 of60 Alhc*mont b Caliuatbn C€rtficato: NA1 548-039{30823.ACC-USL Custom Tolerance Assessment MHITLER TOLEDO $srvirs Eror of lndicaton As Found As Lgf, Software Ve6ion: 123.1.70 Report VeBim:2.'!6.32 Fom Number: AFI 702Lr1.0 @ METTLER TOLEDO fhis i9 an otiginal d@ument and may nol be partially @produ@d wilhoul the writtsn p€rmission of th6 issuing alibration laboEtory. 49 of60 21 of21 Page 2 of 2 50 of60 AlmrEB 1 a (-.r , I i.d : i.) A L_ {-: 1 r,} {_l ,} Method 3/3A Data Location HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refinins - West Bountiful. UT Source FCCU WGS Unit 25 Project No. AST-2023-2878 ()2 Data COz Data Date/Time Et22D3 7: 18 Date/Time ana23 7: l8 Make/ModeUSN Sewomex t420c t420c-2 Servomex 1420c l4l5c-6 Parameter Cylinder ID Cylinder Concentration, 7o Analyzer Concentration, %io Cylinder ID Cylinder Concentration. o/o Analyzer Concentration. 7o Zero Gas 0.00 0.06 0.00 -0.04 High Range Gas RR03252 6.00 5.99 RR03252 ll85 ll 93 Mid Range Gas RR03252 12 00 1 1.98 RR03252 23.70 23.83 Concentration Span, 7o 6.0 I 1.9 Required Accuracy, 7o 0.12 0.24 Run No.Run I Run 2 Run 3 Analysis Date/Time 8/24D023 7:08 8/2412023 7:10 8/24t2023 7.12 Parameter 02o/o CO2o/o Ozo/o COzVo OtVo CO2o/o Analysis #l Analysis #2 Analysis #3 Average 321 13 48 3.s2 13.28 3.30 13.46 3.01 t3.62 3.30 13.44 3.28 13.49 2.88 t3.75 3.30 t3 49 3.45 13.39 3.03 t3.62 3.37 13.40 3.34 t3.45 51 of60 .+-\'-/.'.w5 Red Ball Technical Gas Service 555 Craig Kennedy Way Shreveport, LA 71107 800-551 -8150 PGVP Vendor lD # Gl2021 EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Cylinder Number: Product lD Number: Cylinder Pressure: coA# Customer PO. NO.: Customer: iH03252 127907 gOU PSIG 7R03252.202',t'1O12-0 Certification Oate: Expiration Date: MFG Facillty: Lot Number: Tracking Number: Previous Certification Dates: 10t21t2021 tol19l2r)29 - Shreveoort - LA <RO3?5? ?O211r)1? '103923815 This calibration standard has been certified per the May 201 1? t5?',1 G2 SMART-CERT Concentration Uncertainty Analytical Principle Assayed On !0.18 o/o 10.13 o/o cc1 277A2 .20201022 E80039149.201 9061 0 EB0078072.201 80504 E8O100923 20201022 Mto6t2029 GMIS 11/24/2027 GM|S 07t21/2026 GM|S 05t19t2029 GM|S 20.03 vo 24.75 v6 24 vo 19.47 Vo This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specific€tions. This calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National lnstitute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to the lntemational System of Units (Sl). The basis ofcompliance stated is a comparison ofthe measurement parameteE to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded un@rtainties use a coverage factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confidene level of the measurement, unless otheruise noted. This Glibration cerlificate applies only to the item described and shall not be reprodu@d other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball Technical Gas Seruices. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account when detemining pass or fail. Brittany Johnson Analytical Chemist Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS Ve6ion 02-J. Revised on 2018-09-17 fi@$i,,"^ 52 of 60 ffirlla ::!"d Location: !Lq!9!4L!l{994!lqlg!lBgq!ing. LLC - west Bountiful. UT Prdi..l \. ,0l l-,17R Dete 8/25123 EPA Method 205 Field Calibration of Dilution System Uethod Criteri,EPA :aramter 02 Mak Model s,^ servomex 1400 1120c-2 75 0 :vlinder Number ID Zeao Mid ui-L NA E80093372 :vlinder Cefrified Vrlues Zero Mid 0.0 10.98 74 000 nstrumnt Resoonse (70 or Zeto Mid 0.2 lt I lalibration Cas Seleciion (9/o ofSoanl Mid 43.9 960 l,Iihmrion tr.rror P.rform,n.. rol^ afSnan) Zero Mid 0.1 0.,1 05 inerritv ('/" of Rrns.l -0 I Analyzer Make: sewomex Analyzer Model Analyzer SN: 1420C-2 Environics ID Component/Balance Gas Cylinder Cas ID (Dilution) RR03252 Cylinder Gas Concentiation (Dilution), 7. 24.0 Cylinder Cas ID (Mid-Level) Cylinder Gas Concentration (Mid-Level), 7. Target Mass Flow Trrget Dilution Target Flow Rate Target Conrentration Actual Concentration lnjection I Analyzer Conceotaation Inj€.aion 2 Analyzer Concentrrtion Injection 3 Analyzer Concentration Average Analyzer Concentration Differeme Average Error l0L/5L 800 50 192 t9 2.t9 2 9 9 19)0.02 0 tyo I 0I./5t.500 50 10 12.0 t2.t 12.0 t2t l2 06 006 o 50/" l0L/l L 20.0 40 48 49 49 49 49)oo) I 0I./r t.too 40 2.4 24 239 "00t -o 60/" 'NotallASTEnvironicsUnitshave2-l0LMmsFlowControllers. Forth6emitsdte90To@7lpmMd80%@Tlpminlectionswillnotbeconducted Average Aorlyzer Coocentrrtion lnjection I f,rror Injection 2 Error Injecaion 3 Error t9.22 0 tyo 0.10/o -0.2% 1206 o to/"-o 20/"o lo/" 4S)I 40/^0.5yo 0.90/. 239 o to/"-o'70/"o 60/" Gas Crlibration Dirst to Calibration Gas Concentrrtion Injection I Analyar Concentratioo lnjection 2 An{lyzer Concentraaion lnj€ction 3 Analyzer C@centrrtion Average AMlyzer Concentration Differcnce Average Error l0 98 ll0 il0 t0 t 0r oo o )o/" 53 of60 r:rAilirm tr:qii rigitrc Mass Flov, Controller Calibration Document lI 620 009 Revisior 220 Effective Dat(Pn6t22 lssuing Department T(h SeMces Pao(1of1 Dilution SysEm Make: Dilutbn System Model: Dilution System S/N: Calibration Equiprnent Make: Calibration Equipment Model: Calibration Equipment S/N: Flow Cell S/l.l: Flow Cell S/N: Calibration Gas: Barometric PressuG mmHg: Ambient Temperature,'F: Environics 4040 8028 Alicat Scientific M-10SLPD/5MM-D/5M, M-15LPM-D/5M -197208/197206 197208 197206 Nitrogen 25.13 53.5 Mass Flcw CoF/troller lD Size, ccm: Make: Model: S/N: #1 10,000 Environics EFC 202 0455242015 *2 10,000 Environics Etc 202 0455242016 #3 1,000 Environics EFC 202 0455238008 Set Fbw True Flow Difference cclmin cdmin Set Flow True Flovy Difference cq/min cclmin Set Flow True Flow Difference cahin cq/min 5% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 500 502 0 40/" 1,000 1,013 1.3% 2,000 2,039 2.0% 3,000 3,059 2.0% 4000 4,080 2.0% 5.000 5,'100 2.0% 6,000 6,118 2.00,6 7,000 7,148 2.1% 8,000 8,'181 2.3% 9,000 9,207 2.3% 10.000 10.242 24% 500 499 0.2% 1,000 1,016 1.6Vo 2,000 2,037 '1.90k 3,000 3,062 2.10/0 4,000 4,086 2.2% 5,000 5,104 2.1q. 6,000 6,122 2.0% 7,000 7,146 21% &000 8,173 2.2% 9,000 9,199 2.2% 10,000 10,235 24% 50 48.4 3.2y. 100 98.5 1.5Vo 200 199.8 0.1% 300 300.s 0.2% 400 401.4 0.3% 500 502.3 0.5% 600 604.3 0.70k 700 706.2 0.9% 800 809.1 1.1% 900 I'14.1 1.6% 1,000 1020.5 2.1% Note: Themassflowcontroller'scalibrationvaluesareusedbythedilutionsystem'soperatingsoftwaretoimproveaccuracy. Thesecalibrationsarenotnecessarily indicative of the systems overall performance. Performance is verified by conducting a Method 205 prior to each field use. Calibration Performed By: TCH Date:3/27/2023 54 of60 ^&-.*f,I!$**Accreditation t#6279 Red Ball Technical Gas Service 555 Craig Kennedy Way Shrevepo( LA 71147 800-5st -8{ s0 PGVP Vendor lD # Gt202l EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Cylinder Number: Product lD Number: Cylinder Pressure: coA# Customer PO, NO,: Customer: E80093372 1?337 1 1900 PstG E80093372.2021 0623-0 Cerffficaton Date: Expiration Oate: MFG Facility: Lot Number: Tracking Number: Previous Certifi cation Dates: per the 1U531. 1. SMART.CERT Concentration Uncertairty Analy{cal Prlnclple Assayed On 10.76 o/o 10.98 % umnozg GM|S N2 02 0107/2028 GM|S N2 A2 03,08/2029 GMIS N2 CO2 Analytical lnstrumentation c02 02 NDIR MPA ]heono Them 410i 410i 1162980tr25 6n2DO21 1162960025 C6E5DO21 This is to certiry the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet he defined specifications. This calibrationneal was Performed using Gases or Scales that are t-aceable through National hstitute of StandsEs and Technology (NIST) to the lntemational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the measurement parameters to the speeitled or requked calibration^esting process. The expanded uncerbinties use a coverage facior of k=2 to approximate tfie 9570 Con{idence level of the measuremenl unless otheMise noted. This calibction certificate applies only to the item described and shall not be reprodued otherlhan in tull, wi0routMitten approval trom Red Ba[ Technical Gas SeNices. tf not induded, the unertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken inio account wlten determining pess or fail. Assistant Operations Manager AEsay Laboratou Red Ball TGS Vmion @-J, Revi$d 6 2018{9,17 55 of60 4€AlAtGe 1 ': {:, l1 r'.i ; il &,"- fi fi o L.r rl Locetion HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining - West Bountiful, UT QA/QC Data source FCCU wGS Unit 25 Project No. AST-2023-2E76 Prr.meter PM/CPM TD Nozzle Diem€t€r (in.) ill *2 *3 Dn (Averrse) Diflercnce Criterix Msterirl t/22t23 .250 o 150 0 250 0 250 0.250 0.000 0 004 in glass Drte Pitot lD Evidence of drmrse? Evidence of u{xbrahon or Dr-.i..,^-irap aD2/23 PR-27-OET DO no no Drte Probe or Reference lndicated Diflerence Criterir Probe Length 8/22/23 PR.2?OET 65.0 65.0 0 00/.1.5 % (absolute)5', Field Brlan.e Chcck Det.,Jat23t23 oat24l23 Balace lD 55155 55155 Test Weight ID slcr Kc4 slcIKC4 Certified Weigh! (g)| 000.0 tm.o M6ured Weight G)lm0.t | 000. I Weight Differcnce (g)-o. I -0.1 Drtc Bsrometric Prcslure Evid€nce of Rerding Verified Wuther St.tion Locrtioo u22t23 Weather Shtion No NA No SLC Utah Drt€Meter Bor ID Positivc Pressurc Leek Check t/22/23 M5-30 P6s Reegent Lot#Field Pr€D Ficld Lor Date By Acetone 224472 221719 Posttest Purrc Run 2 Rnn 3 FIo\r Rate (lDm): l4 Flow l(ate (lDm): l4 Clock llme Clock Timc T Clock Time l6: l5 l6:30 l6:45 l7:00 lT ll 74.0 750 75.0 76.0 75.0 45 00 l5 30 45 69.0 69.0 70.0 72.0 740 l5:45 I 6:00 l6: l5 16 30 t6 45 73.0 14.O 73.0 56 of60 DGM Calibration-Orifices Doclment l[620 004 Revisior ?21 Effectve Dat( 12/16/22 l5s!ing Department Tech Setuices Pag(lofl Equipment Detail - Dry Gas Meter Console lD: M5-30 Nleter S/N: tu5-30 Critacal Orafice S/N: 1330 Calibration Detail nitial Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (pb) :inal Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (pbr) \verage Barometric Pressure, in. Hq (Pb) 25.75 25.79 25.77 Critifcal Orifice lD (Y) K' Factor, ftr.Rr/2 / in. WC min (K) Vacuum Pressure, in. Hg (VP) lnitial DGM Volume, ftr (Vm) Final DGM Volume, ftr (Vmr) Total DGt\,4 Volume. frr (Vm) 1330-31 0.8429 13.0 48.204 438 910 15.110 1330-31 1330-25 0.6728 15.0 478.440 489.350 10 910 1330-25 1330-19 0.5186 fl.a 512 800 522710 9.910 1330-19 08429 0 673 0.519 130 438.910 454.625 15.715 150 489 350 500.160 10.810 170 522.710 532.475 9 765 Ambient Temperature, 'F Oa) lnitial DGM Temperature, "F (Tm) Final DGM Temperature, "F (Im, Average DGM Temperature, 'F ( Tm) 66 72 74 73 66 74 74 74 66 15 75 75 66 75 75 75 66 74 73 74 66 73 73 73 Elapsed Time (O) Meter Orifice Pressure, in. WC (AH) Standard Meter volume, ftl (Vmstd) Standard Critical Orifice Volume, ft: (Vcr) [,4eter Correction Factor (Y) Tolerance Orifice Calibration Value (AH @) Toler ance 3ri'ce Cal Chec< 15 00 3.10 13.5251 14.2107 1 051 0 001 1.673 0.012 15.00 3.10 13.5040 14 2107 1.052 0.003 1 669 0 015 13.00 2.00 9.3284 9.8306 1.054 0.004 1 682 0.002 13 00 200 9.2429 9 8306 1 064 0.014 1.682 0 002 15.00 1.20 8 4779 8.1433 1 031 0 018 1 700 0 015 15 00 1.20 8.3617 81433 1 046 0 004 1.701 0.017 1.26 195 1.91 vleter Correction Factor m '1.050 )rifice Calibration Value IAH (a)1.685 )ositive Pressure Leak Check Yes Equipment Detail - Thermocouple Sensor Reference Calibrator Make: Omega Reference Calibrator Model: CL23A Reference Calibrator S/N: T197207 Calibration Detail Reterence Temp.Display Temp Accurac! Difference OF OR I 0 68 100 460 528 560 2 68 100 462 528 560 -0.4 0.0 00 2 0 0 ))1 248 273 683 708 733 225 250 275 685 710 135 -0.3 -0.3 -0.3 2 2 2 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,240 760 860 960 1,060 1,160 1,260 1,360 1,460 1,560 1,660 303 401 501 601 703 801 903 1,003 1,101 1,204 763 86',l 961 1,061 1,163 1,261 1,363 1,463 1,561 1,6U -0.4 -0.1 -0 1 -0 1 -0.3 -0.1 -0.2 -0.2 -0 1 -0.2 3 1 1 1 3 1 3 3 1 4 Personnel 5/12/2023 57 of 60 Calibration By Calibration Date: R. Burton 58 of60 % % lbs/hr % % lbs/hr % % lbs/hr Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Start Time 812212023 L5:50 End Time 8/22/2023 L6:56 CO2 CEMs averase L4.O 02 CEMs average 1.8 Coke Burn 5272.7 Start Time 8123/20239:23 End Time 812312023 Lo:26 CO2 CEMs average 13.7 02 CEMs averase 2.2 Coke Burn 523L.L Start Time 812312023 La:25 End Time 812312023 L5:29 CO2 CEMs average 13.5 02 CEMs average 2.2 Coke Burn 5187.8 59 of 60 --u44fl513'.-ffi[[ 60 of60 0c1 1 1 ?023 Source Information Division of Air Quality Compliance Demonstration Source Information Company Name Holly Refinery - FCCU #25 Company Contact:Travis Smith Contact Phone No.801-299-6625 Source Designation:FCCU #25 Test & Review Dates Test Date: 8/22-23/23 Review Date: 11/27/2023 Observer:Robert Sirrine Reviewer:Robert Sirrine Particulate Emission Limits lbs/1K lbs Coke lbs/hr lbs/MW-hr 0.6000 1.000 Emission Rates - "Front Half" lbs/1K lbs coke lbs/hr lbs/MW-hr 0.1910 0.5034 0.0963 Test Information Stack_I.D._inches As ft^2 Y Dl H @ Cp Pbar Pq (static)Dn 40.00 8.73 1.0500 1.685 0.84 25.5 0.40 0.250 Contractor Information Contracting Company: Alliance Source Testing Contact: Guy Grebe Phone No.: 907-518-1897 Project No.: 8406 Circular 10100 9780 9860 9190 8710 8710 8710 10540 10640 11950 320 10610 10200 10390 1970 1800 1910 1420 1040 1190 1250 F factor used F factors for Coal, Oil, and Gas Anthrocite 2 Lignite Natural Propane Butane COAL OIL GAS Bituminous 2 Fd Fw Fc scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu O2 CO2 lbs/MMBtu Page 1 Summary Division of Air Quality Reference Methods 5 - TSP Compliance Demonstration of Holly Refinery - FCCU #25 Testing Results Lab Data - grams collected Test Date 8/22-23/23 8/22-23/23 8/22-23/23 8/22-23/23 Lab Data Probe Filter Back Circular Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Run 1 0.00805 0.0005 0.00175 As ft^2 8.73 8.73 8.73 Run 2 0.0022 0.0053 0.003 Pbar 25.50 25.50 25.77 Run 3 0.00365 0.00625 0.02062 Pq (static)0.40 0.40 0.39 Run 4 Ps 25.53 25.80 25.80 Avg. Ts F 140.33 141.83 140.75 Front Half Emissions Summary CO2 - FCO2 13.62 13.40 13.45 Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Avg. O2 3.03 3.37 3.34 gr./dscf 0.0034 0.00262 0.0034 0.0031 N2+C 83.35 83.23 83.21 lbs/hr 0.4958 0.4382 0.5762 0.5034 lbs/1K lbs Coal 0.0940 0.0838 0.1111 0.0963 Md 30.30 30.28 30.29 lbs/MMBtu 0.00472 0.00376 0.00486 0.0044 Ms 28.12 28.22 28.19 Y 1.0500 1.0500 1.0500 Cp 0.84 0.84 0.84 Total Emissions Summary w/back half condensable Vm cf 44.20 49.08 50.84 Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Avg. Vlc 180.00 188.90 196.30 gr./dscf 0.0040 0.0037 0.0105 0.0061 AVG. Tm F 73.67 74.08 83.17 lbs/hr 0.5973 0.6134 1.7762 0.9956 lbs/1K lbs Coal 0.1133 0.1173 0.3424 0.191 Vm std 39.28 44.10 44.95 lbs/MMBtu 0.0057 0.00526 0.01498 0.0086 Vw std 8.47 8.89 9.24 Bws 0.18 0.17 0.17 S Bws 0.23 0.24 0.23 Avg. Sqrt Dlp 0.81 0.90 0.92 Vs 53.27 59.08 60.07 F factor used scfm wet 2.09E+04 2.34E+04 2.38E+04 8406 acfm 2.79E+04 3.09E+04 3.15E+04 Qsd dscfh 1.03E+06 1.17E+06 1.19E+06 # Sample Points 12.00 12.00 12.00 Dn 0.250 0.250 0.250 An 3.41E-04 3.41E-04 3.41E-04 Start Time End Time Total Test time 60.00 60.00 60.00 Time @ point 5.00 5.00 5.00 O2 CO2 lbs/M Page 1 Summary 80.00 90.00 100.00 110.00 120.00 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 % I s o k i n e t i c Points Run 1 PxP Isokinetic 80.00 90.00 100.00 110.00 120.00 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 % I s o k i n e t i c Sample Points Run 2 PxP Isokinetic 80.00 90.00 100.00 110.00 120.00 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 % I s o k i n e t i c Sample Points Run 3 PxP Isokinetic 80.00 90.00 100.00 110.00 120.00 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 Sample Points Run 4 PxP Isokinetic Page 2 Run 1 Holly Refinery - FCCU #25 Flow & Moisture Test Date 8/22-23/23 As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg. Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms 8.73 25.50 0.40 25.53 140 13.62 3.03 83.35 30.30 28.12 Y Cp Vm cf Vlc Avg. Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 0.2327 1.0500 0.84 44.200 180.00 73.67 39.282 8.473 0.1774 0.2327 0.999 Avg. Sqrt Dlp Vs scfm wet acfm Qsd dscfh # Sample Points Dn Total Test time (minutes) Time @ point (minutes)Avg. Dlh 0.811 53.27 20,930 27,891 1.03E+06 12 0.25 60 5.00 1.450000 TRUE Point No.Meter (cf) dl "p" dl "h" ts F tm F (in) tm F (out) Imp. Liquid Collected 1 881.200 0.690 1.30 139 72 Wt. (Final) Wt. (Initial) lc 2 884.800 0.640 1.30 141 73 658.0 491.3 166.7 3 888.600 0.590 1.40 141 73 650.0 641.1 8.9 4 892.000 0.720 1.70 140 73 719.2 720.6 -1.4 5 896.000 0.720 1.40 140 73 966.1 960.3 5.8 6 900.000 0.700 1.50 141 74 0.0 7 903.760 0.700 1.50 140 74 8 907.250 0.580 1.50 140 74 Isokinetics 97.4 9 910.920 0.600 1.50 140 74 Test Date 8/22-23/23 10 914.520 0.620 1.50 140 74 Start Time enter enter 11 918.050 0.600 1.40 141 75 0.2330 enter 12 921.570 0.750 1.40 141 75 13 925.400 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 Page 1 Run 2 Holly Refinery - FCCU #25 Flow & Moisture Test Date 5/13/2009 As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg. Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms 8.73 25.77 0.43 25.80 142 13.40 3.37 83.23 30.28 28.22 Y Cp Vm cf Vlc Avg. Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 0.2393 1.0500 0.84 49.075 188.90 74 44.104 8.892 0.1678 0.2393 0.999 Avg. Sqrt Dlp Vs scfm wet acfm Qsd dscfh # Sample Points Dn Total Test time (minutes) Time @ point (minutes)Avg. Dlh 0.905 59.08 23,402 30,932 1.17E+06 12 0.25 60 5.00 1.96 TRUE Point No.Meter (cf) dl "p" dl "h" ts F tm F (in) tm F (out) Imp. Liquid Collected 1 941.865 0.81 2.00 141 71 Wt. (Final) Wt. (Initial) lc 2 946.080 0.84 2.00 141 72 661.3 492.5 168.8 3 950.210 0.79 1.90 142 72 640.2 633.9 6.3 4 954.256 0.81 1.90 142 74 733.5 732.6 0.9 5 958.078 0.81 1.90 142 74 995.5 982.6 12.9 6 962.165 0.73 1.80 142 74 0.0 7 966.030 0.83 2.00 142 73 8 970.147 0.88 2.10 142 75 Isokinetics 96.7 9 974.275 0.87 2.10 142 75 Test Date 8/22-23/23 10 978.423 0.84 2.00 142 76 Start Time enter 11 982.545 0.81 1.90 142 76 0.2330 enter 12 986.660 0.81 1.90 142 77 13 990.940 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 Page 1 Run 3 Holly Refinery - FCCU #25 Flow & Moisture Test Date 5/13/2009 As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg. Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms 8.727 25.77 0.39 25.80 141 13.45 3.34 83.21 30.29 28.19 Y Cp Vm cf Vlc Avg. Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 0.2328 1.0500 0.84 50.845 196.30 83 44.948 9.240 0.1705 0.2328 0.999 Avg. Sqrt Dlp Vs scfm wet acfm Qsd dscfh # Sample Points Dn Total Test time (minutes) Time @ point (minutes)Avg. Dlh 0.920 60.07 23,837 31,455 1.19E+06 12 0.25 60 5.00 2.10 TRUE Point No.Meter (cf) dl "p" dl "h" ts F tm F (in) tm F (out) Imp. Liquid Collected 1 994.400 0.88 2.20 141 81 Wt. (Final) Wt. (Initial) lc 2 998.720 0.95 2.40 141 82 644.8 479.1 165.7 3 1003.420 0.91 2.20 141 82 651.2 636.2 15.0 4 1007.750 0.86 2.10 141 83 733.0 730.9 2.1 5 1011.920 0.81 2.00 141 84 944.2 930.7 13.5 6 1015.800 0.72 1.80 140 84 0.0 7 1019.580 0.77 1.90 141 83 8 1023.550 0.83 2.10 141 84 Isokinetics 97.0 9 1028.140 0.86 2.10 141 83 Test Date 8/22-23/23 10 1032.330 0.90 2.20 140 84 Start Time enter 11 1036.550 0.88 2.20 141 84 0.2330 enter 12 1041.150 0.81 2.00 140 84 13 1045.245 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 Page 1