DRC-2015-002150 - 0901a0688051df0c

Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Blvd. Suite 600
Lakewood, CO, US, 80228
303 974 2140
www.energyfuels.com DRC-2015-002150
April 6, 2015
VIA EXPRESS DELIVERY
Mr. Rusty Lundberg
Director of the Utah Division of Radiation Control
State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144850
Salt Lake City, UT 84116-4850
Dear Mr. Lundberg:
Re: Utah Ground Water Discharge Permit No. UGW3700004
White Mesa Uranium Mill - Roberts Pond Excavation Report
Reference is made to the Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. ("EFRI") Action Plan for Roberts Pond
Impacted Soils dated May 12, 2014 and the associated Division of Radiation Control ("DRC") approval
letter dated June 16, 2014. Pursuant to the Action Plan, EFRI is submitting this report which documents
the EFRI excavation activities completed at Roberts Pond at the White Mesa Mill (the "Mill").
As noted in the attached report, Roberts Pond is considered clean and no further clean up actions are
required and because no impacted soils remain, no additional changes will be required in the surety
estimate.
A final grading plan for the Roberts Pond area will be submitted under separate cover for DRC review
and approval.
Please contact me if you have any additional questions or require any further information.
Yours very truly,
ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC.
Kathy Weinel
Quality Assurance Manager
cc: David C Frydenlund
Dan Hillsten
Harold R. Roberts
David E. Turk
Ryan Ellis
April 6, 2015
VIA EXPRESS DELIVERY
Mr. Rusty Lundberg
Director of the Utah Division of Radiation Control
State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144850
Salt Lake City, UT 84116-4850
Dear Mr. Lundberg:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Blvd. Suite 600
Lakewood, CO, US, 80228
303 974 2140
www.energyfuels.com
Re: Utah Ground Water Discharge Permit No. UGW3700004
White Mesa Uranium Mill-Roberts Pond Excavation Report
Reference is made to the Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. ("EFRI") Action Plan for Roberts Pond
Impacted Soils dated May 12, 2014 and the associated Division of Radiation Control ("DRC") approval
letter dated June 16, 2014. Pursuant to the Action Plan, EFRI is submitting this report which documents
the EFRI excavation activities completed at Roberts Pond at the White Mesa Mill (the "Mill").
As noted in the attached report, Roberts Pond is considered clean and no further clean up actions are
required and because no impacted soils remain, no additional changes will be required in the surety
estimate.
A final grading plan for the Roberts Pond area will be submitted under separate cover for DRC review
and approval.
Please contact me if you have any additional questions or require any further information.
Kathy Weinel
Quality Assurance Manager
cc: David C. Frydenlund
Dan Hillsten
Harold R. Roberts
David E. Turk
Ryan Ellis
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Roberts Pond Excavation Report
State of Utah
Groundwater Discharge Permit No. UGW370004
Prepared by:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Boulevard, Suite 600
Lakewood, CO 80228
April 6, 2015
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 IN"TRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Regulatory Requirements ..................................................................................... 1
1.2 Notifications ......................................................................................................... 1
1.3 Incident History ..................................................................................................... 2
1.4 Containment Procedures ...................................................................................... 2
1.3 Action Plan ............................................................................................................ 3
2.0 EXCAVATION AND FIELD ACTIVITIES .......................................................... 3
2.1 Field and Excavation Activities ........................................................................... 3
2.2 Background and Cleanup Limits .......................................................................... 4
2.2.1 Gamma Background ........................................................................................... 4
2.2.2 Uranium Cleanup Limit ........................................................ ;· ............................. 4
2.2.3 Radium-226 Background and Cleanup Limit.. .................................................. 4
2.3 Samples and Measurements ................................................................................. 5
2.3.1 Gamma Measurements ................................................................................. _ ...... 5
2.3.2 Uranium Analyses .............................................................................................. 5
2.3.3 Radium 226 Analyses ..... _ .................................................................... _ ............... 5
3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW ...................................................................... 6
3.1 Adherence to Action Plan .................................................................................... 6
3.3 Analyte Completeness Review ............................................................................. 6
3.4 Data Review ......................................................................................................... 6
3.4.1 Off-Site Laboratory QA/QC ......................................................................... 7
3.4.2 Miscellaneous Reviews ................................................................................. 7
4.0 RESULTS ................................................................................................................ 8
4.1 Gamma Results ......................................................................................................... 8
4.2 Uranium Results ........................................................................................................ 8
4.3 Ra-226 Results .......................................................................................................... 9
5.0 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................ 9
i
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Figure 1
Tab A
TabB
LIST OF TABLES
Gamma Background Measurements
Radium 226 Background Data
Final Gamma Results
Uranium and Ra-226 Confirmatory Soil Data
LIST OF FIGURES
Roberts Pond Gamma Measurement Grid
INDEX OF TABS
GEL Analytical Data
On-site Laboratory analytical Data
ii
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report documents the Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. ("EFRI") excavation
activities completed at Roberts Pond at the White Mesa Mill (the "Mill"). The
excavation activities described herein were conducted pursuant to the Roberts Pond
Action Plan. The Action Plan was approved by the Utah Division of Radiation Control
("DRC") by letter dated June 16, 2014.
1.1 Regulatory Requirements
a) Part I.E. 7 f) of the Permit requires that the licensee conduct daily inspections for
each of the tailings cells and weekly inspections of Roberts Pond. According to
Part I.E. 7 f):
"In the event that any liner defect or damage is identified during a liner
system inspection, the Permittee shall: 1) report and repair said defect
or damage pursuant to Part I.G.3 by implementation of the currently
approved Liner Maintenance Provisions, and 2) report all repairs made
pursuant to Part I.F.2."
b) Although Part l.G.3 of the Permit is stated to apply to circumstances where the
Permittee fails to maintain Discharge Minimization Technology ("DMT") or
Best Available Technology ("BAT") standards, Part I.E.7 f) requires that the
notification provisions of Part I.G.3 also apply to liner defects or damage,
regardless of whether or not the liner defect or damage constitutes a failure of
DMT or BAT. Under Part I.G.3, the Permittee is required to submit to the
Director a notification and description of the defect or damage orally within 24-
hours of the Permittee's discovery, followed by written notification within five
calendar days.
1.2 Notifications
Mill operations notified the EFRI Quality Assurance Manager on Thursday, March 13,
2014 at 12:30 pm, of liner damage to Roberts Pond that was noted, during routine
operations, apart from routine inspections. As contemplated by Parts I.E.7f) and I.G.3 of
the Mill's State of Utah Groundwater Discharge Permit No. UGW370004 (the "Permit"),
EFRI provided telephone notification to Mr. Thomas Rushing of the DRC at 2:45 pm and
again to Mr. Russ Topham at 3:35pm on March 13, 2014, within 24 hours of the Quality
Assurance Manager receiving information from Mill personnel regarding the incident.
Written notification was provided to the Director of the Utah Division of Radiation
Control ("Director") on March 18, 2014.
1
1.3 Incident History
a) Roberts Pond was empty and out of service in June 2012 for routine
maintenance and preparation for Mill startup. Roberts Pond underwent
cleanout of accumulated sediment during the month of July 2012. The long-
arm bucket excavator used for solids removal created a tear in the flexible
membrane liner ("FML") of Roberts Pond at approximately 1:30pm on July 5,
2012. Reference is made to the EFRI letter dated August 6, 2012. Roberts Pond
was empty at the time of the July 2012 incident, and remained empty, due to the
maintenance outage until August 2012.
b) Repairs to the liner were performed and completed during the weeks of July 5
and July 12, 2012, in accordance with the Mill's Liner Maintenance Provisions.
The Mill returned Roberts Pond to service during the week of August 6, 2012,
and it received process fluids, as necessary, thereafter.
c) EFRI estimates that the liner damage in March 2014 most likely was caused by
heavy equipment contact with the liner itself during the July 2012 maintenance
outage or was a result of stresses to the liner caused by the maintenance
activities in July 2012. The July 2012 maintenance activities are believed to be
the source of the liner damage because no other maintenance activities,
involving the use of heavy equipment, have been performed in the interim.
d) The liner damage or liner stress was not noted at the time of the July 2012
maintenance outage because residual sediments, several inches thick, were left
in place by the heavy equipment used during the July 2012 maintenance
activities.
e) The weekly liner inspections and freeboard measurements specified by the
GWDP were conducted as required. The weekly inspections did not note the
liner damage due to the residual sediments left after the 2012 maintenance
activities and because additional sediments have accumulated during use.
1.4 Containment Procedures
Upon receipt of the initial identification, the Mill's Environmental Coordinator notified
the Mill Manager immediately. The following plan of action was immediately put into
place:
a) Removal of residual fluids in Roberts Pond was immediately implemented by
pumping the fluids to the Cell 1.
b) Mill staffing was increased by 12 for manual removal of the sediments in
Roberts Pond to allow for a thorough inspection of the liner in Roberts Pond.
Initially, sediment removal was completed using only hand equipment to
prevent fmther liner damage in anticipation of repairing the liner. EFRI
2
Management subsequently determined that the liner was not salvageable and
mechanical sediment removal using a long-arm bucket excavator was
employed.
c) Damage caused by the 2012 clean out activities was documented. New damage
resulting from the use of a long-arm bucket excavator in 2014 was also
documented.
1.3 Action Plan
The EFRI letter dated March 18, 2014 which provided notice pursuant to Parts I.E.7 f)
and I.G.3 of the Permit, committed to submitting an Action Plan in response to the liner
damage in Roberts Pond. The Action Plan was submitted to DRC on May 12, 2014 and
was approved by DRC by letter dated June 16, 2014.
2.0 EXCAVATION AND FIELD ACTIVITIES
The clean out of sediments on the liner in Roberts Pond was completed initially by
manual methods (shovels). EFRI Management determined that the liner was not
salvageable and mechanical sediment removal using a long-arm bucket excavator was
employed. After sediment removal, damage to the Roberts Pond Liner was thoroughly
documented. Damage caused by the 2012 clean out activities was documented and is
shown in the Action Plan. New damage resulting from the use of a long-arm bucket
excavator in 2014 was also documented. Newly caused damage was not included in the
Action Plan. The field conditions documented during the sediment removal activities
were used to design the Action Plan in order to address any impacted soils resulting from
the Roberts Pond liner tears. Field and excavation activities are described below.
Because the solutions historically present in the pond were process fluids, it is very
unlikely that there would be other chemical constituents present in the Roberts Pond
subsoil unless they were accompanied by significantly higher uranium values; therefore,
uranium was chosen as the indicator for final clean up of the impacted soils.
DRC approved the use of uranium as the indicator for final clean up, but in a June 21,
2014 teleconference; DRC requested radium-226 ("Ra-226") analyses be completed on
the final verification samples that were sent for off-site analysis. EFRI agreed to analyze
the final verification samples for Ra-226. Only those samples submitted to an off-site
laboratory for uranium verification analyses were analyzed for Ra-226.
2.1 Field and Excavation Activities
The Roberts Pond Liner System was removed. The soils underneath the liner were
visually inspected for staining or other indications that they were impacted by the
solutions. Visually stained soils were removed. Soils removed during cleanup activities
were disposed of in one of the on-site cells.
3
After the visual contamination was removed, a grid pattern of 1Oft. by 1Oft. was
established, extending up beyond the liner anchor trench as shown in Figure 1. Each
point on the grid was surveyed with a Ludlum Model 19 microR meter. An area was
deemed clean when the gamma measurements were within 10% of background.
Background was established as described in Section 2.2.1. Any area with a gamma
measurement greater than 10% of background was re-excavated until the grid point
measurement was within 10% of background.
After all impacted soils were removed based on the gamma measurements, soil samples
were collected and analyzed on site for uranium. Soil samples were collected at 5% of
the grid points used for the microR measurements for verification by analysis for
uranium. Archived soil samples were stored in accordance with the analytical method
requirements for sample preservation and storage until analysis and/or disposal.
2.2 Background and Cleanup Limits
2.2.1 Gamma Background
The gamma measurement background referenced in Section 2.1 above was determined by
averaging gamma measurements collected from the four cardinal directions one mile
from the Mill Restricted Area. Gamma background measurements are included in Table
1.
2.2.2 Uranium Cleanup Limit
The 5% soil verification samples were compared to the EPA Regional Screening Level
(formerly Preliminary Remediation Goals) for uranium as published in the "Regional
Screening Levels (RSL)for Chemical Contaminants at Supeifund Sites"(EPA 2013). The
MCL-based Protection of Groundwater limit of 14 mg/kg was used for the cleanup and
excavation of potentially impacted soils under Roberts Pond. The excavation was
considered complete if the verification soil samples were at or below 14 mg/kg.
2.2.3 Radium-226 Background and Cleanup Limit
As noted in Section 2.0 above, DRC requested Ra-226 analyses be completed on the final
verification samples. No cleanup limits were established for Ra-226 in the Action Plan,
because as previously stated, it is very unlikely that there would be other chemical
constituents present in the Roberts Pond subsoil unless they were accompanied by
significantly higher uranium values; therefore, uranium was chosen as the indicator for
final clean up of the impacted soils. In order to assess the Ra-226 data, EFRI applied
Criterion 6(6) of 10 CFR 40 Appendix A. Criterion 6(6) of 10 CFR 40 Appendix A
states that Ra-226 concentrations must be less than 5 pCi/g over background, averaged
over areas of 100 square meters ("m2") and the first 15 centimeters ("em") of depth.
Background samples for Ra-226 were collected at the same locations as the background
gamma measurements, that is, the four cardinal directions one mile from the Mill
4
Restricted Area. Ra-226 background data are shown in Table 2. Analytical data for the
Ra-226 background samples are included in Tab A.
2.3 Samples and Measurements
2.3.1 Gamma Measurements
As noted above, gamma measurements were collected after visually stained soils were
removed. A grid pattern of 1Oft. by 1Oft. was established within the footprint of Roberts
Pond and up to and including the anchor trench. Grid locations are shown on Figure 1.
Gamma measurements were collected at each grid point. Any area with a gamma
measurement greater than 10% of background, was re-excavated and re-measured until
the grid point measurement was within 10% of background. The final gamma
measurements that are less than background plus 10% are presented in Table 3. Interim
gamma measurements that were greater than background plus 10% are not presented in
Table 3. If the measurement was greater than background plus 10% the measurement
was disregarded after additional excavation was completed. A total of 326 final gamma
measurements were collected.
It is important to note that if an area was re-excavated as a result of a uranium or Ra-226
result being over the clean up criteria for those constituents, the gamma was re-measured
to assure that the gamma clean up criteria were still met.
2.3.2 Uranium Analyses
As noted above, after impacted soils were removed based on the gamma measurements,
soil samples were collected and analyzed on site for uranium. Soil samples were planned
at 5% of the grid points used for the microR measurements for verification by analysis
for uranium. Soil samples were collected at 21 locations, which is 6.4% of the gamma
locations, and exceeds the 5% requirement in the Action Plan.
Uranium analyses were initially completed in the on-site laboratory. Duplicate soil
samples for each location were collected and archived on site. When a location was
deemed clean based on the on-site laboratory results as compared to the uranium limits
described in Section 2.2.2, the archived sample was sent to an off-site laboratory for
verification of uranium results and Ra-226 analysis. If an on-site uranium analysis
exceeded the criteria, the duplicate sample was discarded and re-excavation and re-
analysis was completed. The uranium results from both the on-site and off-site
laboratories are included in Table 4. Copies of laboratory Quality Assurance/Quality
Control ("QA/QC") Summaries for the off-site laboratory are included with the reported
data in Tab A.
2.3.3 Radium 226 Analyses
As noted in Section 2.0 above, DRC requested Ra-226 analyses be completed on the final
soil verification samples that were sent for off-site analysis. Soil samples were collected
5
at 21 locations, which is 6.4% of the gamma locations, and exceeds the 5% requirement
in the Action Plan. The Ra-226 results from the off-site laboratory are included in Table
4. Copies of laboratory QA/QC Summaries are included with the reported data in Tab A.
3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
The QA Manager performed a QA/QC review. The QA included a review of field
procedures, an analyte completeness review, and QC review of laboratory data.
Discussion of adherence to the Action Plan, analytical completeness review and the steps
and tests applied to check laboratory data QA/QC are discussed below.
3.1 Adherence to Action Plan
On a review of adherence by Mill personnel to the Action Plan, the QA Manager
observed that the soil sampling requirements established in the Action Plan were met and
were implemented as required.
3.3 Analyte Completeness Review
Analyses required by the Action Plan were performed. Soil samples were collected at 21
locations, which is 6.4% of the gamma locations, and exceeds the 5% requirement in the
Action Plan.
3.4 Data Review
Data generated during the implementation of the Action Plan included gamma
measurements, on and off-site uranium analytical data, and off-site Ra-226 analytical
data.
Gamma measurements were reviewed for compliance with the Mill Standard Operating
Procedures ("SOPs") for calibration and instrument maintenance. The Mill SOPs were
followed and the gamma measurements were acceptable and usable for the intended
purpose.
The on-site laboratory employed standard QC procedures and analyzed routine QC
samples during their uranium analyses. The on-site laboratory data were used as a
screening tool, and final verification of the clean up was based on the off-site laboratory
data. Because the on-site laboratory data were not used for final decision making, the
data were reviewed for usability and overall quality, however, no further discussion is
included herein. The QC samples were found to be within the laboratory acceptance
ranges and are therefore acceptable for screening. The on-site laboratory data are shown
on Table 4 and are included in Tab B.
For the off-site laboratory data, the QA Manager completed a QC review of the
laboratory data. The results of that review are included below.
6
3.4.1 Off-Site Laboratory QA/QC
The check samples for uranium analyses included at least the following: a method blank,
a laboratory control spike ("LCS"), a matrix spike ("MS") and a matrix spike duplicate
("MSD"), or a serial dilution and/or sample duplicate for the assessment of precision.
The check samples for Ra-226 included at least the following: a method blank, an LCS,
and a sample duplicate for the assessment of precision.
No qualifiers were reported in the QA/QC Summary Reports for either the uranium or
Ra-226 analyses.
Uranium
The information from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports indicates that the
method blanks did not report any detections above the reporting limit.
The information from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports indicates that the LCS
recoveries were within acceptable laboratory limits.
The information from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports indicates that the MS
recoveries were within acceptable laboratory limits.
The information from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports indicates that the serial
dilution and sample duplicate relative percent differences ("RPDs") were within
acceptable laboratory limits.
Ra-226
The information from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports indicates that the
method blanks did not report any detections above the reporting limit.
The information from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports indicates that the LCS
recoveries were within acceptable laboratory limits.
The information from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports indicates that the sample
duplicate recoveries and RPDs were within acceptable laboratory limits.
3.4.2 Miscellaneous Reviews
The QA Manager reviewed the off-site analytical data for holding time compliance,
sample receipt temperature compliance, chain-of-custody ("COC") documentation and
reporting limit compliance. The Action Plan did not specify any acceptance criteria for
these QC measures; however, the QA Manager assessed the compliance based on data
usability. The following summarizes the results of this review:
• All samples were analyzed within the method-specified holding times.
7
• Samples for metals (uranium) and radiologic analyses (Ra-226) do not require
chilling after collection and during shipment. The sample shipments were
acceptable.
• The COC documentation was complete. One error was noted by the QA Manager
during the review. The error is discussed in detail below.
• The reporting limits were acceptable and the resultant data were usable for the
intended purpose. The reporting limits provided data that were below the
specified action limits.
One COC error was noted. In data package 358744, the field personnel inadvertently
noted the wrong collection date on the COC for some of the samples. The COC has been
hand corrected to reflect the correct collection dates. The error does not affect the data
or usability of the data as COC protocols were followed throughout the collection and
analytical process. The samples were maintained in COC at all times, and the error is the
result of a typographical mistake. EFRI has hand corrected the data sheets in Tab A to
reflect the correct collection dates.
No other issues were identified during the QA reviews.
4.0 RESULTS
The results of the sampling and verification efforts are discussed below.
4.1 Gamma Results
As previously stated 326 gamma measurements were collected. The average background
measurement (background + 10%) used as the clean up criteria established in the Action
Plan was 18 uR/hr. Roberts Pond was excavated until all of the measurements were at or
below the criteria established. The final gamma data are shown in Table 3.
Gamma instruments were calibrated and maintained as described in the Mill SOPs and all
appropriate quality checks were completed. All of the gamma data collected during the
Roberts Pond excavation are usable for the intended purpose.
4.2 Uranium Results
As noted in Section 2.3.2 uranium samples were collected at 21 locations during the
excavation activities. Initial analyses were completed in the on-site laboratory, followed
by verification analyses by an off-site laboratory. If either the on-site or off-site
laboratory data did not meet the 14 mg/kg criteria established in the Action Plan, re-
excavation and re-analysis were completed until the 14 mg/kg criteria was met. The 14
mg/kg criteria were met for all of the locations.
The QC data associated with the off-site laboratory analyses indicate that all of the
verification data are usable for the intended purpose. The on-site laboratory data were
8
also usable for the intended purpose, but the on-site data were used for screening
purposes only.
4.3 Ra-226 Results
As noted in Section 2.0 above, DRC requested Ra-226 analyses be completed on the final
verification samples. No cleanup limits were established for Ra-226 in the Action Plan,
because as previously stated, it is very unlikely that there would be other chemical
constituents present in the Roberts Pond subsoil unless they were accompanied by
significantly higher uranium values; therefore, uranium was chosen as the indicator for
final clean up of the impacted soils. In order to assess the Ra-226 data, EFRI applied
Criterion 6(6) of 10 CPR 40 Appendix A. Criterion 6(6) of 10 CPR 40 Appendix A
states that Ra-226 concentrations must be less than 5 pCi/g over background, averaged
over areas of 100 square meters ("m2") and the first 15 centimeters ("em") of depth.
Ra-226 samples were collected at the same 21 locations used for uranium analyses.
Based on the criterion above and the background analyses the clean up limit for Ra-226
was 6.202 pCi/g. The 6.202 pCi/g criteria were met for all of the locations. It is
important to note that the application of this criterion provides an extra level of
conservatism. The criterion is applicable to concentrations within the top 15 em of depth.
The final Roberts Pond Surface is approximately 20 feet below ground surface, which
provides extra conservatism because the surface will be covered as part of the final
closure of Roberts Pond. Final closure is discussed in Section 5 below.
The QC data associated with the off-site laboratory analyses of Ra-226 indicate that all of
the verification data are usable for the intended purpose.
5.0 CONCLUSIONS
Based on the results presented in Section 4.0 above, all of the clean up criteria for gamma
and uranium, established in the Action Plan, have been met. In addition, the Ra-226
criteria established after the approval of the Action Plan have also been met. Roberts
Pond is considered clean and no further clean up actions are required. Because no
impacted soils remain, no additional changes will be required in the surety estimate.
Roberts Pond will be backfilled with clean fill. A design and final grading plan will be
submitted under separate cover for DRC approval.
9
Table 1 · Gamma Backgr·ound Measurements
Gamma
Measu1:em~nt at Gamma
Waist Height Measuren.1~ml at
Gardinal 9i~ecti0n Sample Date ~u~~hr•) Ctll'jt~Cl (uR1br)
North 8118/2014 15 15
East 8/18/2014 17 17
South 8/18/2014 17 17
West 8118/2014 16 16
Average 16** 16**
Gamma Cleanup Level* 18** 18**
* Average of the Background + 10%
** All calculated values were rounded to the nearest whole number to reflect the accuracy of the
instrumentation used.
Table 2 -Radium 226 Background Data
~~<final Di~:ection ,Sampi~ o~te Rk-226 'JI/alue··(pCilg)
North 1111112014 0.925
East 11/11/2014 1.64
South 1111112014 1.52
West 1111112014 0.723
Average 1.202
Ra-226 Assessment Value* (pCi/g) 6.202
* Ra-226 assessment value was determined as described in Criterion 6(6) of 10 CFR 40 Appendix
A. Criterion 6(6) of 10 CFR 40 Appendix A is background+ 5pCi/g in the top 15 em (6 inches) of
soil.
Grid
Location B I c D E -F G H I J -
2 NA NA 14 12 15 16 16 16 14
3 NA 16 16 12 14 16 18 16 16
4 16 16 18 18 16 18 18 18 16
5 14 16 18 16 16 18 18 18 18
6 16 18 18 18 17 18 18 14 18
7 16 18 18 18 18 18 17 14 18
8 12 15 14 15 16 15 17 18 18
9 16 15 12 18 18 18 18 18 18
10 16 14 12 15 18 18 17 16 18
11 ., 13 14 18 18 18 13 18 17 18
12 11 14 15 18 18 18 18 18 18
13 14 16 14 18 14 18 16 16 18
14 17 13 14 16 16 16 16 16 16
15 13 14 15 12 15 14 14 14 18
16 NA 13 15 14 14 14 15 13 15
17 NA NA NA 16 15 12 13 16 _NA
NA = Location is beyond the anchor trench and outside of the survey area.
Confirmnation Soil sample Location
Table 3 -Final Gamma Results
K L M N 0
18 16 18 14 16
14 16 16 18 18
18 16 18 16 18
16 16 16 16 18
18 16 16 18 18
18 18 16 18 18
18 18 16 17 18
18 18 16 16 18
17 17 18 15 17
18 18 16 17 18
18 18 18 18 17
15 18 18 16 18
16 18 18 16 16
18 18 18 18 NA
I NA NA NA 1 NA NA
NA NA NA Nb NA
p Q _ R s T u v w X y
18 17 18 14 14 16 15 18 18 18
18 15 16 18 18 18 15 16 16 17
18 18 18 18 18 18 16 18 18 18
18 18 16 18 18 18 16 18 18 18
17 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18
18 18 18 18 18 16 18 18 18 17
18 18 18 18 18 18 16 18 18 18
16 17 18 17 18 18 18 18 18 16
18 17 17 18 17 18 16 18 18 16
18 18 17 18 16 18 16 18 17 NA
18 18 18 17 18 15 16 18 18 NA .
18 18 18 12 18 15 18 NA NA I NA
16 16 18 17 18 18 NA NA ~ NA NA
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA . NA NA NA
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA . -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA -NA I NA NA -
Table 4-Uranium and Ra-226 Confirmatory Soil Data
Uranium Uranium Uranium GEL Uranium Uranium GEL
Grid WMMLab WMMLab WMMLab Uranium Ra226 WMMLab WMMLab Uranium Ra226
Location Sample. Date (riiglkg). Sample Date , Cm&fkg) Sampl(}: Date ~mgt kg) _$(!mp1~ Date (mg!kg) (pCilg) Sample Date (mg/kg) Sample Date '(mg/kg) Sample Date (mglkg) CpGi/g)
B5 8/26/2014 14.8 9/17/2014 10.1 N/A N/A 9/17/2014 5.45 1.25 N/A N/A N/A N/A 11/11/2014 N/A <1.0
D5 8/26/2014 773 9117/2014 5.13 N/A N/A 9/17/2014 2.32 <1.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dll 8/26/2014 365 9/17/2014 8.51 N/A N/A 9/17/2014 5.29 <1.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
E2 8/26/2014 11.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A 8/26/2014 6.53 1.97 N/A N/A N/A N/A 11/11/2014 N/A <1.0
E15 8/26/2014 44.3 9117/2014 128 9/25/2014 7.29 9/25/2014 11.7 <1.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
FlO 8/26/2014 47.6 9/17/2014 12.5 N/A N/A 9/17/2014 14.4 <1.0 11/11/2014 21.16 11124/2014 12.45 11124/2014 7.5 N/A
F13 8/26/2014 21.7 9117/2014 19.2 9/25/2014 ND 9/25/2014 4.71 1.48 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1111112014 N/A 1.58
Gil 8/26/2014 37.84 9117/2014 52.2 9/25/2014 0.28 9/25/2014 2.82 <1.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
H14 8/26/2014 65.5 9/17/2014 8.7 N/A N/A 9/17/2014 7.82 <1.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
H16 8/26/2014 13.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 8/26/2014 5.38 <1.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
I6 8/26/2014 99.3 9/17/2014 18.9 9/25/2014 7.54 9/25/2014 5.60 <1.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
I7 8/26/2014 45.5 9117/2014 35.39 9/25/2014 12.2 9/25/2014 1.93 <1.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
M8 8/26/2014 65.9 9/17/2014 8.5 N/A N/A 9117/2014 6.04 <1.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
08 8/26/2014 26.5 9/17/2014 9.69 N/A N/A 9/17/2014 32.6 1.12 11111/2014 6.75 N/A N/A 1111112014 2.45 3.44
Q12 8/26/2014 52.6 9117/2014 5.83 N/A N/A 9117/2014 3.31 <1.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
R9 8/26/2014 31.5 9117/2014 11.96 N/A N/A 9/17/2014 15.2 1.09 1111112014 39.82 11/24/2014 10.15 11124/2014 4.94 4.63
S13 8/26/2014 44.8 9/17/2014 17.34 9/25/2014 4.09 9/25/2014 2.95 <1.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
T8 8/26/2014 66.9 9117/2014 3.30 N/A N/A 9/17/2014 2.74 <1.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
TlO 8/26/2014 18.6 9/17/2014 7.27 N/A N/A 9117/2014 7.98 <1.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
V7 8/26/2014 6.24 N/A N/A N/A N/A 8/26/2014 8.81 5.28 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1111112014 4.86
X8 8/26/2014 12.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A 8/26/2014 10.4 <1.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
s: \source\ut\whltemesamlll\data\reclamatlon\roberts pond cleanup 2014\cleanup grid by name.dwg 11x17p rellls
.r-----__._.---~
r
~...X? ~'")(6-~ X5~X4\-:...
l
.x, l.b.tB-~ .\l,f.!~~~.~~w'
I ~v:l-;:g{ \tS-~''-
1
LJ;J-2.-----)c,.J:---U-11~U-10--~U9
~"j:1-2~·T--1 1--@ :r~n. ~T9-@-l'8~T1.-30C-ll
'1<\\(lj. M
I I I l -::« S12 ~ S-1 1-~S1 0-~ ..S9-38( SS---~ S7~--S5·-38( ::iO-E!
~R13-~F!~2 ~ R~"1~-R-~O-@-R9-~RB-~R7-~ F.&
-*~-
1
@ -0·12~~-+-~-01{) ~ Q -~OS ~-07
~Pi2 ~P-4-1 F'--!0·-~B9----J'(-P8.--}g{,·P-:t ~P-E
~ .Q.,_~~ 03. -=.,~_Ql?
" I
~ I -~.oo-A 012 )g(-.012-M Q11~ ~-o1a~o ~1 I ~
x~-N'l-<1 )( N1.3 ~I:>!-1 2-~-N11 ~ N~0-~~9 N8 38(-N?-~L
~ M11J-~-M~~I'.4-1-2-)g{ M1-1-~M:YO--~--M9-,':~>I'·~~ ~·M? )5( M
~US-~L ~!.13--*L~2~L--l-1-~-!...t0 "* !..9 ~ !..8 ~L--?-~--L6-~-L5
I I
)8{ J<15---~K-1 ~--1<..13 ~-Kl2..:_ ~ K11 -~·KlO-~ K9 )5{!<8-3&-K7.-~.K6 -~KS-~~~ \
~ JH-*-J~~-~J12-~ 111-. 38{.J-10 f---J~S-~1-~ J6--~J;
~-!1-6--r ·I1S -~_11>1 -~ !13 ~-11.2~1:1--1-jg( 11 0-~..!9-~-!8'-@J <fD !$.. ~-IS-~-14
H1·7-@.f,i1B--38(-f::l· )~-~-1-2 -~-H9--~-!:!8-)( H7 ~ !,-16--~-!:!S
~--G1-5 ~-G~~-G~ ·)( G~-2-@ G11-3f( G10 ~ GS-~GS--~ G~-*G6-~ G-"-*·G~-Ilfl·• , ,
1
r T'
*f--1S.. -~-F1S ~.F--1-1 @ F13 ~-~12 ~F--.11 ·::) f-<10 --32i F-9-~~ ~"F-1-~..6 ~g_~ F-'1-~ .. f-3
m 51S ---.~--E.:l-4 )8i S--1-3-)8( E-12 J~ S.1·~ ~ E10-):l(-E9-):5(.<8----):li-£? I *66-~li6-
~ 0.1~ ~ D1'i-38( Ct13-~D-12 @ Dl-.1~1
--
® E15 Random Sample Point
38( N2 Gamma Survey Point
~Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
REVISIONS White Mesa Mill
Date I By I County: Son Juan tale: Utah
4/J/15 I RE I ~tian: Roberts Pond
Author: RE
Figure 1
Roberts Pond
Gamma Measurement Grid
ate: 4/6/15 ranedBy:RE
Tab A
GEL Analytical Data
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone]-www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Parameter
Metals Analysis-ICP-MS
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector: Client
Moisture: 10.5%
Qualifier Result
SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium Solid "Dry Weight Corrected"
Uranium 5.45
The following Pre Methods were performed
Method Description
SW846 3050B ICP-MS 3050BS PREP
The following_ Analytical Methods were _eerformed
Method Description
SW846 3050B/6020A
Page 27 of73
SRL
1.00
Analyst
KXP3
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: November 5, 2014
DNMIOOlll
DNMIOOI
358744
CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
1.00 mg/kg 2 BCDI 11/05114 06:52 1426539 I
Date Time Prep Batch
10/14/14 0930 1426537
Analyst Comments
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Company :
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Certificate of Analysis
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
B5
Report Date: November 5, 2014
Project:
Sample ID: 358744007 Client ID:
DNMIOOlll
DNMIOOl
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Solid ~4'0&:oo rl d/trtrtYuJ
09-0CT-14
Client
10.5%
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty
Rad Gamma Spec Analysis
MDC RL
Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-24l,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS "Dry Weight CotTected"
Units
Radium-226 1.25 +/-0.0932 0.116 1.00 pCi/g
The following Prep Methods we~ performed:
Method Description nnl) Date
Dry Soil Prep Dry -oil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 --~-LYTI -----uiil3/14
The following AnalytJ cal Methods were performe~ _
Method DescriP.tiog
DOE HASL 300, 4.5.2.3/Ga-01-R
Notes:
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (1-sigma).
Page 57 of73
DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
MXRI 11/04114 0710 1426803
Time Prep Batch
I 150 1426490
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone]-www.gel.com
Certificate of Analvsis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
D5
358744002
Solid ..:;L~,.g -14 00:'00 r?/n!tt~~
09-0CT-14
Collector: Client
Moisture: 7.06%
Parameter Qualifier Result
Metals Analysis-ICP-MS
SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium Solid "Dry Weight Corrected"
Uranium 2.32
The following Prep Methods were performed _
Method Description
SW846 3050B ICP-MS 3050BS PREP
The f~lowinc. Analytical Methods were ~rformed
Method Description
SW846 3050B/6020A
Page 22 of73
SRL
1.00
Analyst
KXP3
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: November 5, 2014
DNMIOOlll
DNMIOOI
358744
CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
1.00 mg/kg
Date
10/14/14
2 BCDl 11 /05/14 06:22 1426539 I
Time
0930
Prep Batch
1426537
Analyst Comments
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone]-www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: November 5, 2014
Company :
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Parameter
Rad Gamma Spec Analysis
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
D5
358744002
Solid
~::p...j-4 . :00 'i/JJ/ifl~
09-0CT-14
Client
7.06%
MDC RL
Project:
Client ID:
DNMIOOlll
DNMIOOl
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-24l,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS "Dry Weight Conected"
Radium-226 U 0.548 +/-0.0727 0.0896 1.00 pCi/g MXR1 11/04/14 0659 1426803
The following Prep Methods ~ erformed_: _____ _
Method Description
Dry Soil Prep ---Dry ofi Prep GL-RAD-A-021
Analyst Date Time Prep Batch
LYT~l ---10113/14 ---1150-1426490
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method -_l)~cri ~ti n -=-------~~~~-------------
-----__ ___ Anal ~~ ~om~n""'le=n=t ----------
1 DOE HASL 300, 4.5.2.3/Ga-01-R
Notes:
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (1-sigma).
Page 52 of73
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company ; Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
Client Sample ID : Dll
Lab Sample ID : 358744008
Matrix: olid j . , 1
Collect Date: ~t4 9:08 'lht/t 'f(fi1N
Receive Date: 09-0CT-14
Collector: Client
Moisture: 9.33%
Parameter Qualifier Result
Metals Analysis-ICP-MS
SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium Solid "Dry Weight Corrected"
Uranium 5.29
The following Pre Methods were performed
Method Description
SW846 3050B ICP-MS 3050BS PREP
The followin Anal tical Methods were erformed
Method Description
SW846 3050B/6020A
Page 28 of73
SRL
1.00
Analyst
KXP3
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: November 5, 2014
DNMIOOIII
DNMIOOl
358744
CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
1.00 mg/kg
Date
10/14/14
2 BCDl 11/05/14 06:58 1426539 I
Time
0930
Prep Batch
1426537
Analyst Comments
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone]-www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: November 5, 2014
Company :
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
Dll
358744008
Solid ~P-14GCH·Hl 'J/11 fry"{.tH)
09-0CT-14
Client
9.33%
Parameter __ ___gualifi.er_Result Uncertainty MDC
Rad Gamma Spec Analysis
RL
Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-24l,Cs-l37 and Co-60 LCS "Dry Weight Corrected"
Radium-226 U 0.971 +/-0.0993 0.143
The foil wing Prep ~ethods were erformed: __ _
Method De cription
Dry Soil Prep Dry Soi!Prep GL·RAIJ--021-
The following Analytical Methods were performed:_ _ __ _
1.00
Analyst
LYTI
Project:
Client ID:
DNMIOOlll
DNMIOOI
Units
pCi/g
Date
IOf iJ/1-4 -
DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
MXRI 11/04/14 0711 1426803
Time Prep Batch
I j5()" 1426490
Method Descri tion
j -DOE HASL 300, 4.5.2.3/Ga-01-R
______ Analy.§L q_mments
Notes:
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (1-sigma).
Page 58 of73
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone]-www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company :
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
E2
358744009
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Solid . ~5-Sill.2 14-()~QO f'IJ.Wt<f'~
09-0CT-14
Collector: Client
Moisture: 12%
Parameter Qualifier Result SRL
Metals Analysis-JCP-MS
SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium Solid "Dry Weight Corrected"
Uranium 6.53 1.00
The following Pre Methods were performed ----~
Method Description Analyst
SW846 3050B ICP-MS 3050BS PREP KXP3
The follow in~ Analytical Methods were erforme~
Method Description
SW846 3050B/6020A
Page 29 of73
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: November 5, 2014
DNMIOOlll
DNMIOOl
358744
CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
1.00 mg/kg 2 BCD! 11 /05114 07:16 1426539 1
Date Time Prep Batch
10114/14 0930 1426537
---------~ Analyst Comments
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: November 5, 2014
Parameter
Company :
Address :
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
E2
358744009
Solid ~-S>~I ·t~G!ott r/a,lr,,JJAJ
09-0CT-14
Client
Moisture: 12%
Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC
Rad Gamma Spec Analysis
RL
Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-24l ,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS "Dry Weight Corrected"
Radium-226 1.97 +/-0.121 0.158 1.00
The following Prep_Methods wer~performe~ -----
Method Description
Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021
The following Analytical Metho~ were perfom1ed:
Method Description ___ _
DOE HASL 300, 4.5.2.3/Ga-01-R
Notes:
nalyst
LYT C --
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (1-sigrna).
Page 59 of73
Project:
Client ID:
DNMIOOIII
DNMIOOl
Units
pCi!g
Date
l0/13/14
DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method --
MXRI 11/04/14 0852 1426803
Time
I ISO
Prep Batch
1426490
Ana~J'st Comments
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone]-www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Parameter
Company ;
Address :
Contact:
Project:
Metals Analysis-ICP-MS
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
El5
358744021
Solid
25-SEP-14 00:00
09-0CT-14
Client
15.6%
Qualifier Result
SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium Solid "D1y Weight Corrected"
Uranium 11.7
The following Pre Methods were performed
Method Description
SW846 3050B ICP-MS 3050BS PREP
The following Analytical Methods were erformed_
Method Description ---SW846 3050B/6020A
Page 41 of73
SRL
1.00
Analyst
K.XP3
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: November 5, 2014
DNMI00111
DNMIOOl
358744
CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
1.00 mg/kg 2 BCD! 11/05114 03:09 1426541 1
Date Time Prep Batch
1426540 10/14114 0930
Analyst Comments -------
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company :
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
E15
358744021
Solid
25-SEP-14 00:00
09-0CT-14
Client
15.6%
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC
Rad Gamma Spec Analysis
RL
Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-241,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS "Dry Weight Corrected"
Radium-226 U 0.427 +/-0.0673 0.13 I 1.00
The fo.llotving_Prep Methods were _perform~-
Method · Desori t i n
Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-011
The following Analytical Method~ performed:
MeQwQ_ Descri2tion
DOE HASL 300, 4.5.2.3/Ga-01-R
Notes:
naly I
LYTI
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (1-sigma).
Page 71 of73
Report Date: November 5, 2014
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00111
DNMIOOl
Units
pCi/g
Date
10113/14
DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
MXRI 11/04/14 0523 1426814
Time Prep Batch
II~ 1426744-------
Anal :st C mmenl
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone]-www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Matrix:
FlO
358744006
Solid
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
·?5-~ -1~ ~=()· ~/tllt'ltq.J
09-0CT-14
Collector: Client
Moisture: 8.62%
Parameter Qualifier Result
Metals Analysis-ICP-MS
SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium Solid "Dry Weight Corrected"
Uranium 14.4
The following PreP-Methods were p~rformed
Method Description
SW846 305GB ICP-MS 3050BS PREP
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
SW846 3050B/6020A
Page 26 of73
SRL
1.00
Analyst
K.XP3
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: November 5, 2014
DNMIOOlll
DNMIOOl
358744
CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
1.00 mg/kg
Date
10/14114
2 BCDl 11/05/14 06:46 1426539 1
Time
0930
Prep Batch
1426537
Analyst Comments
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: November 5, 2014
Parameter
Company :
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
FlO
358744006
Solid . . , 1 -~-sEP=+4"'0o~oo-ct !tt!tr;.wv
Receive Date: 09-0CT-14
Collector: Client
Moisture: 8.62%
Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC
Rad Gamma Spec Analysis
RL
Gamrnaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-24l,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS "Dry Weight Corrected"
Radium-226 U 0.660 +/-0.079 0.115 1.00
The following Prep Methods were perfonned:
Method De ·cri p1 ion
Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL.ifA 0".:\-Qi I
The following Analytical Methods were performed: __
Method _2)escription
DOE HASL 300, 4.5 .2.3/Ga-01-R
Notes:
Analyst
LYTI
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (1-sigma).
Page 56 of73
Project:
Client ID:
DNMIOOIII
DNMIOOl
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCi/g MXRl 11/04/14 0710 1426803
Date Time Prep Batch
II 13M 1150 1426490
Analyst Con:u11entL __
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone]-www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Parameter
Metals Analysis-ICP-MS
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
Client Sample ID: F 13
Lab Sample ID: 358744020
Matrix: Solid
Collect Date: 25-SEP-14 00:00
Receive Date: 09-0CT -14
Collector: Client
Moisture: 7.61%
Qualitier Result
SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium Solid "Dry Weight Corrected"
Uranium 4.71
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description
SW846 3050B ICP-MS 3050BS PREP
The followin Anal tical Methods were erformed
Method Description
SW846 3050B/6020A
Page 40 of73
SRL
1.00
Analyst
KXP3
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: November 5, 2014
DNMI00111
DNMI001
358744
CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
1.00 mg/kg 2 BCD! 11/05/14 08:35 1426539 1
Date Time Prep Batch
1426537 10114114 0930
---------Analyst Comments
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone]-www.gel.com
Certificate of Analvsis
Company ;
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
Fl3
358744020
Solid
25-SEP-14 00:00
09-0CT-14
Client
7.61%
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC
Rad Gamma Spec Analysis
RL
Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-24l,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS "Dry Weight Corrected"
Radium-226 1.48 +/-0.120 0.180 1.00
The following Prep Methods were performed:
Method Description
Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep-G-:o:L::-_-::::RA-:-:::D-..,-A,.--0=21
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Analyst
LYTl
Project:
Client ID:
Report Date: November 5, 2014
DNMI00111
DNMIOOl
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method ----
pCi/g
Date
10/13/~
MXRl 11 /04/14 0727 1426803
Time Prep Batch
1150 1426490
Method _llisoriptiorL ~-------AJ!~~L ommeu $
I DOE HASL 300, 4.5.2.3/Ga-01-R
Notes:
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (1-sigma).
Page 70 of73
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Parameter
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Gil
358744018
Solid
25-SEP-14 00:00
09-0CT-14
Client
6.38%
Qualifier Result
Metals Analysis-ICP-MS
SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium Solid "Dry Weight Corrected"
Uranium 2.82
SRL CRDL
1.00 1.00
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: November 5, 2014
DNMIOOlll
DNMIOOI
358744
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
mg/kg 2 BCD! 11 /05114 08:23 1426539 1
The following Prep Methods were performed ----------Method Description Analyst Date Time
SW846 3050B ICP-MS 3050BS PREP KXP3 10/14/14 0930
The follow in Analytical Methods were perform::..:e;..:d ________ _
Method Description Analyst Comments
SW846 3050B/6020A
Page 38 of73
Prep Batch
1426537
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone]-www.gel.com
Company :
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Certificate of Analysis
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
Report Date: November 5, 2014
Client Sample ID: Gll Project: DNMI00111
DNMIOOl Sample ID: 358744018 Client ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Solid
25-SEP-14 00:00
09-0CT-14
Client
6.38%
Parameter ___Qualifier Result Uncertainty
Rad Gamma Spec Analysis
MDC RL
Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-241,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS "Dry Weight Corrected"
Radium-226 U 0.612 +/-0.0857 0.116 1.00
The followin~ Prep Methods were performed: __ ~-. __ _
Units
pCi/g
Method De cri(>tion Analyst Date
D~U Prep --Ory Soi1Prep OL-RA@-A-IJ21 ----LYT1 -1 0113114
The following Analytical Methods were perfom1ed: ___ _
Method_ __l>!?Si;ri !i ~~ __ _
DOE HASL 300, 4.5.2.3/Ga-01-R
Notes:
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (!-sigma).
Page 68 of73
DF Analys!_Date Time Batch Method
MXRI 11/04/14 0714 1426803
Time Prep Batch
JTio 1426490
-------
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone]-www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Matrix:
Hl4
358744004
Solid
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
..,ZS-£1W-1400;oo ?tq/,r~J.HJ
09-0CT-14
Collector: Client
Moisture: 6.11%
Parameter Qualifier Result
Metals Analysis-ICP-MS
SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium Solid "Dry Weight Corrected"
Uranium 7.82
The followi_!!g_ Prep Methods were performed
Method Description
SW846 3050B ICP-MS 3050BS PREP
The followin Analytical Methods w~performed __
Method Description
SW846 3050B/6020A
Page 24 of73
SRL
1.00
Analyst
KXP3
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: November 5, 2014
DNMIOOlll
DNMIOOl
358744
CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
1.00 mg/kg 2 BCD! 11/05/14 06:34 1426539 I
Date Time Prep Batch
10/14/14 0930 1426537
Analyst Comments
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Company :
Address :
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Certificate of Analysis
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
Hl4
Report Date: November 5, 2014
Project:
Sample ID: 358744004 Client ID:
DNMI00111
DNMIOOl
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Solid
"2fi-EP-~4-· 9:00 tit tkf~
09-0CT-14
Client
6.11%
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC RL
Rad Gamma Spec Analysis
Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-24l,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS "Dry Weight Corrected"
Radium-226 U 0.948 +/-0.0833 0.118 1.00
The following Pre Methods were erforrned:
Units
pCi/g
Method De crlpliou Analyst Date
Dry Soil l'rt1> Dry Soi1Pfep l-RAI)·A·021 __ _ LYT1 -10/13{14
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Meth.QQ_ __ Description
l DOE HASL 300, 4.5.2.3/Ga-01-R
Notes:
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (1-sigma).
Page 54 of73
DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
MXRI 11/04/14 0700 1426803
Time Prep Batch
11SiJ 1426490
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Hl6
358744015
Solid ~ -l<tOO:flO t"/;;,;./t'i lt+t,/
,09-0 :T-14
Collector: Client
Moisture: 10.1%
Parameter Qualifier Result
Metals Analysis-ICP-MS
SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium Solid "Dry Weight Corrected"
Uranium 5.38
The following Prep Methods were erformed
Method Description
SW846 305GB ICP-MS 3050BS PREP
The following Analytical Methods were performed _____ _
Method Description
SRL
1.00
Analyst
KXP3
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: November 5, 2014
DNMIOOI 1 I
DNMIOOl
358744
CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
1.00 mg/kg 2 BCD! 11/05114 08:05 1426539 1
Date Time Prep Batch
10114/14 0930 1426537
Analyst Comments
~---------SW846 3050B/6020A
Page 35 of73
GEL LA BORA TORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: November 5, 2014
Company :
Address :
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc,
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
Hl6
358744015
Solid
25 8BP 14 80!00 r/~r;/tr
09-0CT-14
Client
10.1%
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC
Rad Gamma Spec Analysis
RL
Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-24l,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS "Dry Weight Corrected"
Radiwn-226 U 0.952 +/-0.0893 0.110 1.00
The following Pre Methods were performed:
Project:
Client ID:
DNMIOOII1
DNMIOOI
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method ----
pCi/g MXR1 11/04/14 0713 1426803
Method Description Analyst Date Time
I ISO
Prep Batch
1426490 Dry Soil Prep D ry Soifhep GL-RAD-A-021 LY'I;l ---10113/14--
The following Analytical Methods were performe'!:_
Method Descripti2!!_ _ru_l3.1.Y Conune~ _
I DOE HASL 300, 4.5.2.3/Ga-01-R
Notes:
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (1-sigma).
Page 65 of73
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Parameter
Metals Analysis-ICP-MS
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
16
358744017
Solid
25-SEP-14 00:00
09-0CT-14
Client
7.59%
Qualifier Result
SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium Solid "Dry Weight Corrected"
Uranium 5.60
,!he following Prep Methods were erformed
Method Description
SW846 3050B ICP-MS 3050BS PREP
The followin Analytical Methods w~performed
Method Description
SW846 3050B/6020A
Page 37 of73
SRL
1.00
Analyst
KXP3
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: November 5, 2014
DNMI00111
DNMI001
358744
CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
1.00 mg/kg
Date
10114114
2 BCDill/05/1408:17 14265391
Time
0930
Prep Batch
1426537
Analyst Comments
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analvsis
Parameter
Company :
Address :
Contact:
Project:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
Client Sample ID: 16
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
358744017
Solid
25-SEP-14 00:00
09-0CT-14
Client
7.59%
Qualifier Result Uncertainty -----MDC
Rad Gamma Spec Analysis
RL
Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-241 ,Cs-13 7 and Co-60 LCS "Dry Weight Corrected"
Radium-226 U 0.547 +/-0.0685 0.109 1.00
The followin Prep Methods were performed_: __
Method De · riplion
Dry SoiJPfeP Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD;.A ... Ol l --~
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Analy l
LYT1-
Project:
Client ID:
Report Date: November 5, 2014
DNMIOOlll
DNMIOOl
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCilg MXR1 11/04/14 0714 1426803
Date Time Prep Batch
1 omc-cn~4,_----,-1 .,..,1s=-=-o 14264!.!=o=--------~
Method __ Descriotion ___________ _
DOE HASL 300, 4.5.2.3/Ga-01-R
A1:taJ Sl Comments
Notes:
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (1-sigma).
Page 67 of73
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone]-www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Parameter
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
17
358744019
Solid
25-SEP-14 00:00
09-0CT-14
Client
10.1%
Qualifier Result
Metals Analysis-ICP-MS
SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium Solid "Dry Weight Corrected"
Uranium 1.93
The following_ Prep Method~e perform __ ed __ _
Method Description
SRL
1.00
Analyst
~----SW846 3050B ICP-MS 3050BS PREP KXP3
The following Analytical Methods were erformed
Method Description
SW846 3050B/6020A
Page 39 of73
Proiect:
Client ID:
ClientSDG:
Report Date: November 5, 2014
DNMI00111
DNMI001
358744
CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
1.00 mg/kg
Date
10114/14
2 BCD! 11/05/14 08:29 1426539 I
Time
0930
Prep Batch
1426537
Analyst Comments
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Company:
Address :
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Certificate of Analysis
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
17
Report Date: November 5, 2014
Project:
Sample ID: 358744019 Client ID:
DNMI00111
DNMIOOI
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Solid
25-SEP-14 00:00
09-0CT-14
Client
10.1%
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty
Rad Gamma Spec Analysis
MDC RL Units
Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-241,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS "Dry Weight Corrected"
Radium-226 U 0.416 +/-0.0792 0.131 1.00 pCi/g
The follow in~ Prep Methods were performe..=d.;_: --~
Method Description Analy t Date
Dry Soil Prep ----Dry S(}il Prep GL-RAD-A-021 -yy.yl---f0/13114
The followin.g Analytical Methods were performed:
MXRI 11/04/14 0715 1426803
Time Prep Batch
!ISO 1426490
Method _____Q_escri tion An~)' 'L Comments
DOE HASL 300, 4.5.2.3/Ga-01-R
Notes:
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (1-sigma).
Page 69 of73
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
M8
358744003
, olid ~:&Po--14-Gf>:OO f/, 1/l'l &td
09-0CT-14
Collector: Client
Moisture: 11.7%
Parameter Qualifier Result SRL
Metals Analysis-ICP-MS
SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium Solid "DIJ' Weight Corrected"
Uranium 6.04 1.00
The followin Prep Methods were erfo_r_m_e_d __
Method Description Analyst
SW846 3050B ICP-MS 3050BS PREP KXP3
The following Analytical Methods were erformed
Method Description
SW846 3050B/6020A
Page 23 of73
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: November 5, 2014
DNMI00111
DNMIOOI
358744
CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
1.00 mg/kg 2 BCDl 11 /05/14 06:28 1426539 I
Date Time Prep Batch
10/14/14 0930 1426537
Analyst Comments
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: November 5, 2014
Company :
Address :
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
M8
35 8744003
Solid
~~J+Oe: e r/,z/tt~!l#)
09-0CT-14
Client
11.7%
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC
Rad Gamma Spec Analysis
RL
Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-24l,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS "Dry Weight Corrected"
Radium-226 U 0.661 +/-0.0727 0.0947 1.00
The ~llowin ' Prep Methods were performed:
Method Description
Dry Soil Prep -Dry Soil Prep OL-RAD-A-021
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method _ __ Descri tion
DOE HASL 300, 4.5.2.3/Ga-01-R
Notes:
Analyst
-LY~
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (1-sigma).
Page 53 of73
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00111
DNMIOOI
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCi/g
Date
10/13114
MXRI 11/04114 0700 1426803
Time Prep Batch
1150 -1426490
-~ __Analvst Comrne_1~ ---------
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analvsis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
08
358744010
Solid
---BEM'41)0;00 'ilr71rrt w
09-Q ;r-14
Collector: Client
Moisture: 10.7%
Parameter Qualifier Result
Metals Analysis-ICP-MS
SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium Solid "Dry Weight Corrected"
Uranium 32.6
The following Pre . Methods were performed
Method Description
SW846 3050B ICP-MS 3050BS PREP
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
SW846 3050B/6020A
Page 30 of73
SRL
1.00
Analyst
KXP3
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: November 5, 2014
DNMIOO!ll
DNMI001
358744
CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
1.00 mg/kg 2 BCDl 11105/14 07:22 1426539 I
Date Time Prep Batch
10114/14 0930 1426537
Analyst Comments
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone]-www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: November 5, 2014
Company :
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
08
358744010
Solid
-HP 1-4 o: o '1 In 1{1! )~H)
09-0CT-14
Client
10.7%
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty_ MDC
Rad Gamma Spec Analysis
RL
Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-24l,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS "Dry Weight Corrected"
Radium-226 1.12 +/-0.0923 0.146 1.00
The foliO\ in Prep Method~ere performed:
Method De! cription
Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep (;CRAi).A·Oll
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method Description
DOE HASL 300, 4.5.2.3/Ga-01-R
Notes:
Ana ly t
I:YTJ
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (1-sigma).
Page 60 of73
Project:
Client ID:
DNMIOOlll
DNMIOOI
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCi/g MXRl 11/04/14 0711 1426803
Date Time Prep Batch
10113114 1150 1426490-
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Matrix:
012
358744013
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Solid . .
25 8-~0:00 '1/r?frt('f'-'t./
09-0CT-14
Collector: Client
Moisture: 10.5%
Parameter Qualifier Result
Metals Analysis-ICP-MS
SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium Solid "Dry Weight Corrected"
Uranium 3.31
_!he following Prep Method~ performed
Method Description
SW846 3050B ICP-MS 3050BS PREP
The follow in Analytical Methods were erformed
Method Description
SW846 3050B/6020A
Page 33 of73
SRL
1.00
Analyst
KXP3
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: November 5, 2014
DNMI00111
DNMI001
358744
CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
1.00 mg/kg 2 BCD! 11/05/14 07:41 1426539 I
Date Time Prep Batch ---10/14/14 0930 1426537
Analyst Comments
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: November 5, 2014
Company :
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
Ql2
358744013
Solid
-2--5-S P-14-0
09-0CT-14
Client
10.5%
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC
Rad Gamma Spec Analysis
RL
Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-24l,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS "Dry Weight Corrected"
Radium-226 U 0.920 +/-0.0924 0.146 1.00
The followin Prry Methods were erforrned:
Method Description
Dry Soil Prep -Dry 'oil Prep GL-RAD-A-021-
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Meth~-__ Des~tion
l DOE HASL 300, 4.5.2.3/Ga-01-R
Notes:
A.nai)'St
LYT1
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (!-sigma).
Page 63 of73
Project:
Client ID:
DNMIOOlll
DNMIOOl
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method ----
pCi/g
Date
iU/13114
MXR1 11/0411 4 0712 1426803
Time Prep Batch
1150 l 426490
_Ao_g!Y$ Comments -~
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Matrix:
R9
358744012
Solid
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
~--~-6:0(:) fhltflll,J
0 -OCT-14
Collector: Client
Moisture: 6.98%
Parameter Qualifier Result SRL
Metals Analysis-ICP-MS
SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium Solid "D1y Weight Corrected"
Uranium 15.2 1.00
The followin Prep Methods were erform:..;;.ed;;;.___
Method Description Analyst
SW846 305GB ICP-MS 3050BS PREP KXP3
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description ------------------SW846 3050B/6020A
Page 32 of73
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: November 5, 2014
DNMIOOlll
DNMIOOl
358744
CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
1.00 mg/kg
Date
I 0/14/14
2 BCD! 11/05114 07:34 1426539 1
Time
0930
Prep Batch
1426537
Analyst Comments
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: November 5, 2014
Company :
Address :
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
R9
358744012
Solid -~~-~~~e-~/tzhrr~
09-0CT-14
Client
6.98%
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC --'---
Rad Gamma Spec Analysis
RL
Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-24l,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS "Dry Weight Corrected"
Radium-226 1.09 +/-0.0831 0.136 1.00
The following Pre ~ethods were performed :
Method Descrip ion Analyst
Dry oil Prep -Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 L YTl
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method Description
DOE HASL 300, 4.5.2.3/Ga-01-R
Notes:
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (1-sigma).
Page 62 of73
Project:
Client ID:
DNMIOOlll
DNMIOOI
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCi/g MXRI 11/04114 0712 1426803
Date Time Prep Batch
10113114 1150 1426490
Anal
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Parameter
Metals Analysis-ICP-MS
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Sl3
358744016
Solid
25-SEP-14 00:00
09-0CT-14
Client
5.74%
Qualifier Result
SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium Solid "Dry Weight Corrected"
Uranium 2.95
The followin Prep Methods were performed
Method Description
SW846 3050B ICP-MS 3050BS PREP
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
SW846 3050B/6020A
Page 36 of73
SRL
1.00
Analyst
KXP3
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: November 5, 2014
DNMI00111
DNMIOOl
358744
CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
1.00 mg/kg 2 BCDI 11/05114 08:1 I 1426539 I
Date Time Prep Batch ----10/14/14 0930 1426537
Analyst Comments
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone]-www.gel.com
Certificate of Analvsis
Company :
Address:
Contact:
Project: ---Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
Sl3
358744016
Solid
25-SEP-14 00:00
09-0CT-14
Client
5.74%
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC
Rad Gamma Spec Analysis
RL
Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-24l,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS "Dry Weight Corrected"
Radium-226 U 0.494 +/-0.0646 0.111 1.00
The following Prep Methods were performed: __
Method Description
Dry Soil Prep Dry oil Prep GL-RAD-A-021
The following Analytical Methods .:!!!!._e performed: ~ _
Method Description
DOE HASL 300, 4.5.2.3/Ga-01-R
Notes:
Analyst LYT_l __
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (!-sigma).
Page 66 of73
Project:
Client ID:
Report Date: November 5, 2014
DNMIOOlll
DNMIOOl
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method ---
pCi/g MXRI 11/04/14 0714 1426803
Date
I 0/13/-14--
Time nso Prep Batch
1426490
Analvst Comme""n"'ts"----
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
Client Sample ID: T8
Lab Sample ID: 358744011
Matrix: Solid .
Collect Date: -2-S-· -!'4-6tH)(}-fh/!t'/r!lt.J
Receive Date: 09-0CT-14
Collector: Client
Moisture: 5.89%
Parameter Qualifier Result SRL
Metals Analysis-ICP-MS
SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium Solid "Dry Weight Corrected"
Uranium 2.74 1.00
The following__Prep Methods ~eerformed ___ __ _ ___ _
Method Description Analyst
SW846 3050B ICP-MS 3050BS PREP KXP3
The following Anal tical Methods were performed
Method Description
SW846 3050B/6020A
Page 31 of73
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: November 5, 2014
DNMI00111
DNMI001
358744
CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
1.00 mg/kg
Date
10/14/14
2 BCD! 11/05114 07:28 1426539 1
Time
0930
Prep Batch
1426537
Analyst Comments
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone]-www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: November 5, 2014
Company :
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
T8
358744011
Solid
-2 --S~I-4-00;00 'ilrll'l #td
09-0CT-14
Clienl
5.89%
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC RL
Rad Gamma Spec Analysis
Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-24l,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS "Dry Weight Corrected"
Radium-226 U 0.897 +/-0.097 0.153 1.00
The following Prep Methods were performed:
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00111
DNMIOOI
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCi/g MXRl 11 /04/14 0711 1426803
Method De ription Analy_st__ Date Time Prep Batch
LYTl !Of] l 14--J150 1426490 Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method Descri tion ~--~
DOE HASL 300, 4.5.2.3/Ga-01-R
_Anal~Comments ---~~----
Notes:
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (1-sigma).
Page 61 of73
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone]-www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
TIO
358744001
Solid ~· t+eG~O ?/,7h'/~
09-0CT-14
Collector: Client
Moisture: 3.62%
Parameter Qualifier Result
Metals Analysis-ICP-MS
SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium Solid "D1y Weight Corrected"
Uranium 7.98
_The following Pre
Method Description
SW846 3050B ICP-MS 3050BS PREP
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
SW846 3050B/6020A
Page 21 of73
SRL
1.00
Analyst
KXP3
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: November 5, 2014
DNMIOOlll
DNMIOOI
358744
CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
1.00 mg/kg
Date
10/14/14
2 BCD1 11/05114 05:40 1426539 1
Time
0930
Prep Batch
1426537
Analyst Comments
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: November 5, 2014
Company :
Address :
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
TlO
358744001
Solid
•25-S£:P..l4i1&:06 f/ !t11r'f ~
09-0CT-14
Client
3.62%
Parameter Qualifier ~esult Uncertainty MDC
Rad Gamma Spec Analysis
RL
Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-24l,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS "Dry Weight Corrected"
Radium-226 U 0.986 +/-0.103 0.109
The f0~ ill1£ Prep Methods were perform~ _____ _
Method Description
Diy oi.l Prep Dry oil Prep GL-RAD-A-021
The following Analytical Methods were performed: -~~~
1.00
Anal.y t
LYTI·~
Method Description __ _ __ __ __ ___ -~
·I DOE HASL 300, 4.5.2.3/Ga-01-R
Notes:
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (1-sigma).
Page 51 of73
Project:
Client ID:
DNMIOOlll
DNMIOOI
Units
pCi/g
Date
10113/14
D_F Analyst Date Time Batch Method
MXRJ 11/04/14 0659 1426803
Time Prep Batch -wo-1426490--
AnaJ st Comments
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company ; Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
V7
358744014
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Solid 1 ~.-li)&P-14-ee:eo "i'f.2r,lry-
09-0CT-14
Collector: Client
Moisture: 12.5%
Parameter Qualifier Result SRL
Metals Analysis-ICP-MS
SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium Solid "Dry Weight Corrected"
Uranium 8.81 1.00
_!he following_ Prep Methods were _performe~
Method Description Analyst
SW846 3050B ICP-MS 3050BS PREP KXP3
The following Analytical Methods were perfo1·mcd
Method Description
SW846 3050B/6020A
Page 34 of73
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: November 5, 2014
DNMI00111
DNMIOOl
358744
CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
1.00 mg/kg 2 BCD! 11/05/14 07:47 1426539 1
Date Time Prep Batch
1426537 10/14/14 0930
---~----~~ Analyst Comments
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: November 5, 2014
Company :
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
V7
358744014
Solid j
---2§ o.:oa. , t.2V11~1.,J
09-0CT-14
Client
12.5%
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC
Rad Gamma Spec Analysis
RL
Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-24l,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS "Dry Weight Corrected"
Radium-226 5.28 +/-0.255 0.308 1.00
The following Prep Methods were performed_:_
Project:
Client ID:
DNMIOOlll
DNMIOOl
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method ----
pCilg MXRJ 11/04/14 0712 1426803
Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch
Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 LYT1 ----'10/1~~--1-426490 ----
The following Analytical Methods ~performed:
Met.!!Q4._ Descriph=·o=n __ __ Analyst Comments
DOE HASL 300, 4.5.2.3/Ga-01-R
Notes:
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (!-sigma).
Page 64 of73
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
X8
358744005
Solid ~~e-..14-()g:go ~/.1,lt1~
09-0CT-14
Collector: Client
Moisture: 13 .2%
Parameter Qualifier Result
Metals Analysis-ICP-MS
SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium Solid "Dry Weight Corrected"
Uranium 10.4
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description
SW846 3050B ICP-MS 3050BS PREP
The following Analytical Methods were erformed
Method Description
SW846 3050B/6020A
Page 25 of73
SRL
1.00
Analyst
KXP3
Proiect:
ClientiD:
Client SDG:
Report Date: November 5, 2014
DNMI00111
DNMIOOl
358744
CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
1.00 mg/kg
Date
10/14/14
2 BCD! 11/05114 06:40 1426539 1
Time
0930
Prep Batch
1426537
Analyst Comments ---------
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone]-www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: November 5, 2014
Company :
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
X8
358744005
Solid ~ r~q,frr lkA)
09-0CT-14
Client
13 .2%
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC RL
Rad Gamma Spec Analysis
Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-24l,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS "Dry Weight Corrected"
Radium-226 U 0.940 +/-0.104 0.161 1.00
The following Pre Methods were performed:
Project:
Client ID:
DNMIOOIII
DNMIOOI
DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method --------------~ Units
pCi/g MXR1 11/04/14 0701 1426803
Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch
Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 L YTI -------,-1.,-01""'13""'17"14· 1150 1426490
The following Analytical Methods were performed: -----------------Method De~s:::.cr!..!i.t:.pt!:!:io:::!n:!..__ ________________________ _ Anal st Comments
DOE HASL 300, 4.5.2.3/Ga-Ol-R
Notes:
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (1-sigma).
Page 55 of73
(ijijll [ Laboratories LLC
a member of The GEL Group INC PO Box 30712 Charleston, SC 29417
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407
P 843.556.8171 F 843.766.1178
November 05, 2014
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Re: Soil Projects
Work Order: 358744
Dear Ms. Weinel:
GEL Laboratories, LLC (GEL) appreciates the opportunity to provide the enclosed analytical results for the
sample(s) we received on October 09, 2014. This original data report has been prepared and reviewed in
accordance with GEL's standard operating procedures.
Our policy is to provide high quality, personalized analytical services to enable you to meet your analytical needs
on time every time. We trust that you will find everything in order and to your satisfaction. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 4487.
Purchase Order: DW16138
Enclosures
Sincerely
Sylainna Rivers
Project Manager
www.gel.com
Page 2 of73
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Soil Projects
SDG: 358744
Page 3 of73
November 05, 2014
Laboratory Identification:
GEL Laboratories LLC
2040 Savage Road
Charleston, South Carolina 29407
[phone]
Summary:
Receipt Narrative
for
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
SDG: 358744
Sample receipt: The samples arrived at GEL Laboratories LLC, Charleston, South Carolina on October 09,
2014 for analysis. The samples were delivered with proper chain of custody documentation and signatures. All
sample containers arrived without any visible signs of tampering or breakage. There are no additional comments
concerning sample receipt.
Sample Identification: The laboratory received the following samples:
Laboratory ID Client ID
358744001 TIO
358744002 D5
358744003 M8
358744004 Hl4
358744005 X8
358744006 FlO
358744007 B5
358744008 Dll
358744009 E2
358744010 08
358744011 T8
358744012 R9
358744013 Q12
358744014 V7
358744015 Hl6
358744016 Sl3
358744017 16
358744018 Gil
358744019 17
358744020 Fl3
358744021 El5
Case Narrative:
Sample analyses were conducted using methodology as outlined in GEL's Standard Operating Procedures. Any
technical or administrative problems during analysis, data review, and reduction are contained in the analytical
case narratives in the enclosed data package.
Page 4 of73
The enclosed data package contains the following sections: Case Narrative, Chain of Custody, Cooler Receipt
Checklist, Data Package Qualifier Definitions and data from the following fractions: Metals and Radiochemistry.
Sylainna Rivers
Project Manager
Sheet 1 of 2
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Samples Shipped to: -::G:;:;e;:.:l L~a==b;;:.o:...:ra:.:.:to:.:..rl=es=--:--------Contact: Kathy Weinel
2040 Savage Road Ph: 303.389.4134
Charleston, sc 29407 kwelnel®eOeroyfuels.cOm
Chain of Custody/Sampling Analysis Request
Project Samplers Name Samplers Signature
Robert's Pond David Turk I iJ Ll/!7 . I
Time
SampleiD Date Collected Coli;tted Laboratory Analysis Requested
T10 d}f25ne1'4 flit. r~t\Wilr *See Attached Quote
D5 9{~/2614 " f1. ;~ fliA *See Attached Quote
M8 ~512014 'f. J-; ~II t!IA *See Attached Quote
H14 --9/26/2B4 4 "' .1. Ul. *See Attached Quote
XB ~iJ.29~ 1. r~ . fJ;, lA *See Attached Quote
F10 Qfi!512e1r!t· ' II 111/i~ A *See Attached Quote
85 ...eli!~14fJ 111. 1.1 vJ ~A *See Attached Quote
011 -Mo!ilaef~. ~ ~,.; 'Jrll ~ ~ ·s·ea Attached Quote
E2 -~&H2Qq~l: ~ ,'#tj A *See Attached Quote
08 .Q.Q~~ ',I) A •see Attached Quote
T8 ·-912m20 121 ...... .A. 111 •see Attached Quote
R9 9125/a014 ((J /, !f'l! " *See Attached Quote
Q12 ~51261'4 ' (1 J'fJ~ ,.., *See Attached Quote
V1 912&12G~4 Iii :~Jd li *See Attached Quote
H16 o91ii,Q9~ 4 I ,~ ·~ " •see Attached Quote
S13 9125/2014 Ill NA •see Attached Quote
16 9/25/2014 NA •see Attached Quote
Comments: Please send report to Kathy Weinel at [e-mail]
lgnature)
Date!Time
Page 5 of73
Sheet 1 of 2
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Samples Shipped to: Gel Laboratories Contact: Kathy Weinel ~~~~~~~--------------2040 Savage Road Ph: 303.389.4134
Charleston, SC 29407 [e-mail]
Chain of Custody/Sampling Analysis Request
p . t rojec s amp1ers N a me s s· al]lplers i.tQnature
Robert's Pond David Turk I /J ll/11 ' ..
Time
Sample ID Date Collected Collected Laboratory Analysis Requested
T10 9/25/2014 NA *See Attached Quote
D5 9/25/2014 NA *See Attached Quote
M8 9/25/2014 NA *See Attached Quote
H14 9/25/2014 NA *See Attached Quote
XB 9/25/2014 NA *See Attached Quote
F10 9/25/2014 NA *See Attached Quote
B5 9/25/2014 NA *See Attached Quote
011 9/25/2014 NA *See Attached Quote
E2 9/25/2014 NA *See Attached Quote
08 9/25/2014 NA *See Attached Quote
TB 9/25/2014 NA *See Attached Quote
R9 9/25/2014 NA *See Attached Quote
Q12 9/25/2014 NA *See Attached Quote
V7 9/25/2014 NA *See Attached Quote
H16 9/25/2014 NA *See Attached Quote
S13 9/25/2014 NA *See Attached Quote
16 9/25/2014 NA *See Attached Quote
Comments: Please send report to Kathy Weinel at [e-mail]
Ref "l~~d By:(Signature) Date/Time
IO!f/~q~~
Relinquished By:(Signature) Date/Time
Page 5 of73
Sheet 2 of 2
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Samples Shipped to: Gel Laboratories Contact: Kathy Weinel -=2-=-04-:-:o=-s::::-a--'v~a-ge--=R~o-ad-:---------Ph: 303.389.4134
Charleston, SC 29407 [e-mail]
Chain of Custody/Sampling Analysis Request
p . t rojec s amp ers N arne s am p ers Si gnature
Robert's Pond David Turk I tllit''l
Time
Sample 10 Date Collected Collected Laboratory Analysis Requested
G11 9/25/2014 NA *See Attached Quote
17 9/25/2014 NA *See Attached Quote
F13 9/25/2014 NA *See Attached Quote
E15 9/25/2014 NA *See Attached Quote
Comments: Please send re_Q_ort to Katl}y_ Weinel at [e-mail]
Relln~litl/(Signature)
Relinquished By:(Signature)
Page 6 of73
Datemme ""1-"!P
0 [ Laboratories LLC SAMPLE RECEIPT & REVIEW FORM
Client: 1 )tJ tv\y SDG/ARICOC/Work Order: 'b 'j ~ 1\ L-\. Y:
Received By: ~ Date Received: w leo 1\L\
Suspected Hazard Information ~ 0 •JfNet Counts> IOOcpm on samples not marked "radioactive", contact the Radiation Safety Group for further
> z investigation,
COC/Samplcs marked as radioactive? v Ml!x'irrtum Net Cowus Observed• (Ob~Qrvcd Counts-Area Rnckground Coun~: {) (.\)'IV\.
Classified Radioactive II or III by RSO? v If yes, Were swipes taken of sample contatiners <action levels?
COC/Samples marked containing PCBs? J
Package, COC, and/or Samples marked as J, beryllium or asbestos containing? If yes, samples oro to be scgregcnted as Sttfcty Controlled Sam_l)los, and opened by the GEL Srullly Group,
Shipped as a DOT Hazardous? J l-luv.ard Class Shin1•~d: UN#:
Samples identified as Foreign Soil? .,/
1mplc Receipt ~ ~ z f'nmm~n• •• (Required· for Nl.n-~uuou• """S Items) ~·
!Shipping containers received intact I./ Circle Applicable:
1 land sealed? Seals broken Damaged contnincr Leaking container Other (describe)
1 Samples requiring cold preservation I 2l~C... Prcser;alion Method: Icc bags Blue ice Dry ic~ C~ Other (describe)
within (0 < 6 deg, C)?* •olltcmperoturcs arc recorded in
Daily check performed and passed on IJ ITcuop-.••••·> Device Serial#: ry} f)3"Z.~
2a !R temperature gun? •. , Temperature Device Serial# (If Applicable):
Chain of custody documents included
lwith shipment? ll
Circle Applicable:
4 Sample containers intact and sealed? Seals broken Damaged container Leaking container Other (describe)
!Samples requiring chemical J !Sample TD's, containers affected and observed pH:
II"~,,,. vauuu at proper pH? lrr -T.olil'
IVOA vials free ofheadspace (defined .; !Sample TD's and contuincrs affected:
las< 6mm bubble)?
I Arc Encore containers present? j ICifycs, immcdi•tcly deliver to Volatiles laboratory)
7
/ !D's and tests affected:
8 !Samples received within holding time~
9 !sample ID's on COC match !D's on
lboltlcs? I/ !Sample !D's and containers affected:
Date & time on COC match date & J 'affected:
10 I time on bottles? ~(I ""(ilc..,."b
Number of containers received match !Sample ID's nfJcctcd:
11 number indicated on COC?
12 Are sample containers identifiable as I GEL provided?
13 COC form is properly signed in
1relinnni• ;ved sections?
FcdEx Air FcdEx Ground ~ Field Services Courier Other .
14 I carrier and tracking number. \ 1; '\£01-i '-\ "{ 03 qQ/flb '5 \ ~ '6
~~v• (Usc Continuation Form if needed):
PM (or PMA) review: Initials .'XJJ Date \DI \0 \1.:i Pagel-r_l GL-CHL-SR-001 , I
Page 7 of73
~E: Robert's Pond chain of custody
1 of2
> •
Subject: RE: Robert's Pond chain of custody
From: Kathy Weinel <[e-mail]>
Date: 10/10/2014 11:25 AM
To: Sylainna Rivers <[e-mail]>
Sylainna,
These are confirmation samples -there are no times. Just use ee:ee for the
times.
If that is a problem let me know
K
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
Kathy Weinel
Quality Assurance Manager
t: 303-389-41341 f: 303-389-4125
225 Union Blvd., Suite 600,
Lakewood, CO, US, 80228
http://www.energyfuels.com
This e-mail is intended for the exclusive use the of persorr(s) mentioned as the
recipient(s). This message and any attached files with it are confidential and
may contain privileged or proprietary information. If you are not the intended
recipient(s) please delete this message and notify the sender. You may not use,
distribute print or copy this message if you are not the intended recipient(s).
-----Original Message-----
From: Sylainna Rivers [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 8:13 AM
To: Kathy Weinel
Subject: Robert's Pond chain of custody
Hey Kathy,
Time collected field on chain of custody is listed as N/A. Can you please send
collect times?
Thanks!
Sylalinna
Sylainna Rivers
Project Manager
GEL Laboratories, LLC
2040 Savage Road
Charleston, SC (USA) 29407
Direct: 843.769.7371
Main: 843.556.8171 xt 4487
Fax: [phone]
10/10/201411:33 AM
Page 8 of73
m: Robert's Pond chain of custody
2 of2
E-mail: [e-mail]
Web: www.gel.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any files transmitted
with it are the property of The GEL Group, Inc. and its
affiliates. All rights, including without limitation copyright,
are reserved. The proprietary information contained in this
e-mail message, and any files transmitted with it, is intended
for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of
this e-mail is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that you have received this e-mail in error and that any
review, distribution or copying of this e-mail or any files
transmitted with it is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and
delete the original message and any files transmitted. The
unauthorized use of this e-mail or any files transmitted with it
is prohibited and disclaimed by The GEL Group, Inc. and its
affiliates.
Page 9 of73
10/10/201411:33 AM
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
GEL Work Order/SDG: 358744 Robert's Pond
Client SDG:
Project Manager:
Project Name:
Purchase Order:
Package Level:
EDD Format:
358744
Sylainna Rivers
DNMI00111 Soil Projects
DW16138
LEVEL3
EIM_DNMI
GELID Client Sample ID Client Sample Desc.
358744001 T10
358744002 D5
358744003 M8
358744004 H14
358744005 X8
358744006 F10
358744007 85
358744008 D11
358744009 E2
358744010 08
358744011 T8
358744012 R9
358744013 012
358744014 V7
358744015 H16
358744016 S13
358744017 16
358744018 G11
358744019 17
358744020 F13
358744021 E15
Client Sample ID
-601 T10
-602 05
-603MB
Status Tests/Methods
REVW Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-
241,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS
REVW SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium
Solid
REVW Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-
241,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS
REVW SW846 30508/6020A Uranium
Solid
REVW Gammas pee Ra-226 w/ Am-
241,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS
Collect
Date & Time
25-SEP-14 00:00
25-SEP-14 00:00
25-SEP-14 00:00
25-SEP-14 00:00
25-SEP-14 00:00
25-SEP-14 00:00
25-SEP-14 00:00
25-SEP-14 00:00
25-SEP-14 00:00
25-SEP-14 00:00
25-SEP-14 00:00
25-SEP-14 00:00
25-SEP-14 00:00
25-SEP-14 00:00
25-SEP-14 00:00
25-SEP-14 00:00
25-SEP-14 00:00
25-SEP-14 00:00
25-SEP-14 00:00
25-SEP-14 00:00
25-SEP-14 00:00
Product
Reference
Work Order Due Date: 06-NOV-14
Package Due Date:
EDD Due Date:
Due Date:
SXK1
Receive Time #of
Date & Time Zone Cont.
09-0CT-14 09:30 -2
09-0CT -14 09:30 -2
09-0CT-14 09:30 -2
09-0CT-14 09:30 -2
09-0CT-14 09:30 -2
09-0CT-14 09:30 -2
09-0CT-14 09:30 -2
09-0CT-14 09:30 -2
09-0CT-14 09:30 -2
09-0CT-14 09:30 -2
09-0CT -14 09:30 -2
09-0CT -14 09:30 -2 1
09-0CT-14 09:30 -2
09-0CT-14 09:30 -2
09-0CT-14 09:30 -2
09-0CT-14 09:30 -2
09-0CT -14 09:30 -2
09-0CT-14 09:30 -2
09-0CT-14 09:30 -2
09-0CT-14 09:30 -2 1
09-0CT-14 09:30 -2
Fax Date PM Comments
03-NOV-14
05-NOV-14
06-NOV-14
Lab
Matrix
SOLID
SOLID
SOLID
SOLID
SOLID
SOLID
SOLID
SOLID
SOLID
SOLID
SOLID
SOLID
SOLID
SOLID
SOLID
SOLID
SOLID
SOLID
SOLID
SOLID
SOLID
Report Date: 05-NOV-14
Work Order: 3587 44
Page 1 of 4
Collector: C
Prelogin #: 20141022417
Project Workdef ID: 1352217
SDG Status: Closed
Logged by:
Fax Days to Prelog Lab Field
Due Date Process Cote# Group QC QC
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
Receive
Aux Data Codes
M r-
4-< 0
0 .......
(L)
~ ll-<
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
REVW SW846 30508/6020A Uranium
Solid
-004 H14 REVW Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-
241,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS
REVW SW846 30508/6020A Uranium
Solid
-005 X8 REVW Gammas pee Ra-226 w/ Am-
241,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS
REVW SW846 30508/6020A Uranium
Solid
-006 F10 REVW Gammas pee Ra-226 w/ Am-
241,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS
REVW SW846 30508/6020A Uranium
Solid
-Q07 BS REVW Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-
241,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS
REVW SW846 30508/6020A Uranium
Solid
-008 011 REVW Gammas pee Ra-226 w/ Am-
241,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS
REVW SW846 30508/6020A Uranium
Solid
-oog e2 REVW Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-
241,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS
REVW SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium
Solid
-010 08 REVW Gammas pee Ra-226 w/ Am-
241,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS
REVW SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium
Solid
-Q11 T8 REVW Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-
241,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS
REVW SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium
Solid
-012 R9 REVW Gammas pee Ra-226 w/ Am-
241,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS
REVW SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium
Solid
-o13 Q12 REVW Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-
241,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS
REVW SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium
Solid
-014 V7 REVW Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-
241,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS
REVW SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium
Solid
-015 H16 REVW Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-
241,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS
REVW SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium
Solid
-016 S13 REVW Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-
241,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS
REVW SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium
Solid
-017 16 REVW Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-
241,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS
REVW SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium
Solid
-018 G11 REVW Gammas pee Ra-226 w/ Am-
241,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS
REVW SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium
Solid
-019 17 REVW Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-
241,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS
Report Date: 05-NOV-14
Work Order: 3587 44
Page 2 of 4
~ r--
'-+-< 0 ...... -~ 01)
C':l ~
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
-020 F13
-621 E15
REVW SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium
Solid
REVW Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-
241,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS
REVW SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium
Solid
REVW Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-
241,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS
REVW SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium
Solid
Product: GSCGAMMS Workdef ID: 1354325
Method: DOE HASL 300, 4.5.2.3/Ga-01-R
In Product Group? No
Product Description: Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-241 ,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS
Group Name:
Samples: 001,002,003,004,005,006,007,008,009,010,011,012,013,014,015,016,017,018,019,020,021
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS#
14596-10-2
10045-97-3
10198-40-0
13982-63-3
Parmname
Americium-241
Cesium-137
Cobalt-60
Radium-226
Product: MIM50B20AUS Workdef ID: 1352219
Method: SW846 3050B/6020A
Product Description: SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium Solid
In Product Group? No
Client RDL or
PQL& Unit
.1
Group Name:
Reporting
Units
pCi/g
pCilg
pCi/g
pCilg
Samples: 001 ,002,003,004,005,006,007,008,009,010,011 ,012,013,014,015,016,017,018,019,020,021
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS#
7440-61-1
Contingent
Tests
Parmname
Uranium
Action Product Name
Login Requirements:
Requirement
Description
Client RDL or
PQL & Unit
Samples
Reporting
Units
mg/kg
Include? Comments
Report Date: 05-NOV-14
Work Order: 3587 44
Page 3 of 4
Group Reference:
Path: Standard
Product Reference:
Moisture Correction: "Dry Weight Corrected"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
SPIKE
SPIKE
SPIKE
REG
N
N
N
y
y
y
y
y
Group Reference:
Path: Standard
Product Reference:
No
Moisture Correction: "Dry Weight Corrected"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
REG y y Yes
M t'-
4-;
0
C'l
Q)
bi)
c:';l
0-.
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
Peer Review by: ____________ _ Work Order (SDG#), PO# Checked? ____ _
Report Date: 05-NOV-14
Work Order: 3587 44
Page 4 of 4
C of C signed in receiver location? _____ _
(") r--
4-< 0
(") ........
llJ Oil ro A..
List of current GEL Certifications as of 05 November 2014 -I I State Certification
Alaska UST-110
Arkansas 88-0651
CLIA 42D0904046
California NELAP 01151CA
Colorado SC00012
Connecticut PH-0169
Delaware SC000122013-10
DoD ELAP/ ISO 17025 A2LA 2567.01
Florida NELAP E87156
1--Foreign Soils Permit P330-12-00283,P330-12-00284
Georgia SC00012
Georgia SDWA 967
Hawaii scooo 122013-10
Idaho Chemistry SC00012
Idaho Radiochemistry SC00012
Illinois NELAP 200029
Indiana C-SC-01
Kansas NELAP E-10332
Kentucky 90129 r-Louisiana NELAP 03046 (AI33904)
Louisiana SDW A LA130005
Maryland 270
Massachusetts M-SC012
Michigan 9976
Mississippi SC000122013-10
Nebraska NE-OS-26-13
Nevada SC000122014-1
New Hampshire NELAP 2054
New Jersey NELAP SC002
New Mexico -f---· SC00012
New York NELAP 11501
North Carolina 233
North Carolina SDWA 45709
Oklahoma 9904
Pennsylvania NELAP 68-00485
Plant Material Permit PDEP-12-00260
South Carolina Chemistry 10120001
South Carolina GVL 23611001
South Carolina Radiochemi 10120002
Tennessee TN02934
TexasNELAP Tl04704235-14-9
UtahNELAP scooo 122014-16
Vermont VT87156 -Virginia NELAP 460202
Washington C780-12
Wisconsin 999887790
Page 14 of73
Sample ID
358744001
358744002
358744003
358744004
358744005
358744006
358744007
358744008
358744009
358744010
-358744011
358744012
358744013
358744014
358744015
358744016
358744017
358744018
358744019
358744020
358744021
1203185618
1203185623
1203185619
1203185624
1203185622
1203185627
1203185620
1203185625
1203185621
1203185626
Sample Analysis
Client ID
TIO
D5
M8
H14
X8
FlO
B5
Dll
E2
08
T8
R9
Ql2
V7
Hl6
Sl3
16
Gil
17
Fl3
El5
Metals Fractional Narrative
Energy Fuels Resources (DNMI)
SDG358744
Method Blank (MB)ICP-MS
Method Blank (MB)ICP-MS
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
35874400l(TIOL) Serial Dilution (SD)
35874402l(E15L) Serial Dilution (SD)
35874400l(TIOD) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
35874402l(El5D) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
35874400l(T10S) Matrix Spike (MS)
35874402l(El5S) Matrix Spike (MS)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on a "dry weight" basis.
Method/ Analysis Information
Page 15 of73
Page 16 of73
Analytical Batch: 1426539 and 1426541
Prep Batch: 1426537 and 1426540
Standard Operating Procedures: GL-MA-E-014 REV# 25 and GL-MA-E-009 REV# 24
Analytical Method: SW846 3050B/6020A
Prep Method : SW846 3050B
Preparation/ Analytical Method Verification
The SOP stated above has been prepared based on technical research and testing conducted by GEL Laboratories,
LLC and with guidance from the regulatory documents listed in this "Method/ Analysis Information" section.
System Confi~:uration
The Metals analysis -ICPMS was perfonned on a Perkin Elmer ELAN DRC-e inductively coupled plasma mass
spectrometer (ICP-MS). The instrument is equipped with a cross-flow nebulizer, quadrupole mass spectrometer, and
dual mode electron multiplier detector, and dynamic reaction cell. The DRC-e uses a dynamic reaction cell to
eliminate polyatomic interferences. Internal standards of scandium, germanium, indium, tantalum, and/or lutetium
were utilized to cover the mass spectrum. Operating conditions are set at 1400W power and combined argon pressures
of360+/-7 kPa for the plasma and auxiliary gases, and 0.85 Llmin carrier gas flow, and an initial lens voltage of 5.2.
Calibration Information
Instrument Calibration
All initial calibration requirements have been met for this sample delivery group (SDG).
CRDL/PQL Requirements
The CRDL/PQL standard recoveries met the referenced advisory control limits.
ICSA/ICSAB Statement
All interference check samples (ICSA and ICSAB) associated with this SDG met the established acceptance criteria.
Continuing Calibration Blanks (CCB) Requirements
All continuing calibration blanks (CCB) bracketing this batch met the established acceptance criteria.
Continuing Calibration Verification (CCV) Requirements
All continuing calibration verifications (CCV) bracketing this SDG met the acceptance criteria.
Ouality Control (QC) Information
Method Blank (MB) Statement
The MBs analyzed with this SDG met the acceptance criteria.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) Recovery
The LCS spike recoveries met the acceptance limits.
Quality Control (QC) Sample Statement
The following samples were selected as the quality control (QC) samples for this SDG: 358744001 (TlO) and
358744021 (E15)-ICP-MS.
Page 17 of73
Matrix Spike (MS) Recovery Statement
The percent recoveries (%R) obtained from the MS analyses are evaluated when the sample concentration is less than
four times (4X) the spike concentration added. All applicable analytes met the acceptance criteria.
Duplicate Relative Percent Difference (RPD) Statement
The RPD obtained from the designated sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated based on acceptance criteria of 20%
when the sample is >5X the contract required reporting limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value
is less than 5X the RL, a control of +/-RL is used to evaluate the DUP results. All applicable analytes met these
requirements.
Serial Dilution % Difference Statement
The serial dilution is used to assess matrix suppression or enhancement. Raw element concentrations 25x the
IDL/MDL for CVAA, 50X the IDL/MDL for ICP and lOOX the IDL/MDL for ICP-MS analyses are applicable for
serial dilution assessment. All applicable analytes met the established acceptance percent difference criteria.
Technical Information
Holding Time Specifications
GEL assigns holding times based on the associated methodology, which assigns the date and time from sample
collection of sample receipt. Those holding times expressed in hours are calculated in the AlphaLIMS system. Those
holding times expressed as days expire at midnight on the day of expiration. All samples in this SDG met the specified
holding time.
Preparation/ Analytical Method Verification
All procedures were petfonned as stated in the SOP. Method SW-846 3050B is not a total digestion technique for
most samples. It is a very strong acid digestion that will dissolve almost all elements that could become
environmentally available. By design, elements bound in silicate structures are not normally dissolved by this
procedure as they are not usually mobile in the environment.
Sample Dilutions
Dilutions are performed to minimize matrix interferences resulting from elevated mineral element concentrations
present in solid samples and/or to bring over range target analyte concentrations into the linear calibration range of the
instrument. The ICPMS solid samples in this SDG were diluted the standard two times. ICP-MS.
Preparation Information
The samples in this SDG were prepared exactly according to the cited SOP.
Miscellaneous Information
Electronic Packaging Comment
This data package was generated using an electronic data processing program referred to as virtual packaging. In an
effort to increase quality and efficiency, the laboratory has developed systems to generate all data packages
electronically. The following change from traditional packages should be noted:
Analyst/peer reviewer initials and dates are not present on the electronic data files. Presently, all initials and dates are
present on the original raw data. These hard copies are temporarily stored in the laboratory. An electronic signature
page inserted after the case narrative will include the data validator's signature and title. The signature page also
includes the data qualifiers used in the fractional package. Data that are not generated electronically, such as hand
written pages, will be scanned and inserted into the electronic package.
Data Exception (DER) Documentation
Data exception reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or
contractual documents. Data exception reports were included behind the Case Narrative or in the Miscellaneous Data
section of this data package. A data exception report was not required for this SDG.
Additional Comments
Additional comments were not required for this SDG.
Page 18 of73
Page 19 of73
Certification Statement
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.
Review Validation:
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data validator. In addition, all data designated for CLP or
CLP-like packaging will receive a third level validation upon completion of the data package.
The following data validator verified the information presented in this case narrative:
Rev;",." nm~~~ Dat"·---=--\\6__:_·1Y __ _
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone]-www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis Report
for
DNMIOO 1 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Client SDG: 358744 GEL Work Order: 358744
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
** Analyte is a surrogate compound
B For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank.
B Metals--Either presence of analyte detected in the associated blank, or MDLIIDL < sample value < PQL
U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
U Metals--Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the greater of either the MDL or the CRDL.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the Certificate of Analysis.
The designation ND, if present, appears in the result column when the analyte concentration is not detected above
the limit as defined in the 'U' qualifier above.
This data report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with GEL Laboratories LLC
standard operating procedures. Please direct any questions to your Project Manager, Sylainna Rivers.
Reviewed by
Page 20 of73
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407-[phone]-www.gel.com
QC Summary Reuort Date: November 5, 2014 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Workorder: 358744
Parmname NOM
Metals Analysis-ICPMS
Batch 1426539
QCI203185620 358744001 DUP
Uranium
QC1203185619 LCS
Uranium 4.90
QC12031 85618 MB
Uranium
QC1203185621 358744001 MS
Uranium 5.15
QC1203185622 358744001 SDILT
Uranium
Batch 1426541
QC12031 85625 358744021 DUP
Uranium
QC1203185624 LCS
Uranium 4.76
QCI203185623 MB
Uranium
QC1203185626 358744021 MS
Uranium 5.76
QC1203185627 358744021 SD!LT
Uranium
Notes:
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
**
<
>
Analyte is a surrogate compound
Result is less than value reported
Result is greater than value reported
__ S_ample Qual
7.98
u
7.98
39.5
11.7
u
11.7
51.2
The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product
QC Units RPD/D%
---
9.75 mg/kg 20.0
4.57 mg/kg
1.00 mg/kg
13.5 mglkg
8.30 ug/L 5.14
10.8 mglkg 8.04
4.99 mg/kg
1.00 mg/kg
18.0 mg/kg
10.6 ug/L 3.94
A
B For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank.
Page 42 of73
REC% Range Anlst
(0%-20%) BCD!
93.2 (80%-120%)
108 (75%-125%)
(0%-10%)
(0%-20%) BCD!
105 (80%-120%)
110 (75%-125%)
(0%-10%)
Page 1 of 2
Date Time
11105/14 05:46
11105/14 05:22
11105114 05:15
11 /05/14 05:52
11105114 06:04
11 /05/14 03:15
11/05/14 02:51
11 /05/14 02:45
11105114 03:21
11/05114 03:27
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 358744
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPD/D% REC%
C Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis
D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample
E Metals--%difference of sample and SD is > 10%. Sample concentration must meet flagging criteria
F Estimated Value
Ran~e Anlst
Page 2 of 2
Date Time
FB Mercury was found present at quantifiable concentrations in field blanks received with these samples. Data associated with the blank are deemed
invalid for reporting to regulatory agencies
H Analytical holding time was exceeded
M Matrix Related Failure
N Metals--The Matrix spike sample recovery is not within specified control limits
N/A RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.
Nl
ND
NJ
Q
R
u
u
X
y
h
See case narrative
Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager conceming this qualifier
One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative orDER.
Sample results are rejected
Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
Metals--Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the greater of either the MDL or the CRDL.
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager conceming this qualifier
QC Samples were not spiked with this compound
RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.
Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded
N/A indicates that 'j)ikc rec very lin1i do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike cone. by a fuct r of 4 or more or %RPD not appli .tblc.
"TI1 Rcbl!ive Percelll DiCfcrcnce (RPD obtained from the sample dupli He (DUP i evaluated 11gain t the a •ceptance criteria v hen the ~ample is greater than
live tim~'S (5X) th conthu.\t I'C<JUirCtl dcwct.iqnlimit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a eontrollinifl. df +/-the
RL i uSl.'<l to evaluate the DUP result. * Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.
For PS, PSD, and SDIL T results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.
Page 43 of73
Page 44 of73
Method/Analysis Information
Radiochemistry Case Narrative
Energy Fuels Resources (DNMI)
SDG 358744
Product: Dry Weight-Percent Moisture
Analytical Method: Dry Soil Prep
Analytical Batch Number: 1426490
Sample ID Client ID
358744001 TIO
358744002 D5
358744003 M8
358744004 Hl4
358744005 X8
358744006 FlO
358744007 B5
358744008 Dll
358744009 E2
358744010 08
358744011 T8
358744012 R9
358744013 Q12
358744014 V7
358744015 Hl6
358744016 S13
358744017 16
358744018 Gil
358744019 17
358744020 Fl3
1203185535 358744001(T10) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.
SOP Reference
Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by GEL Laboratories LLC as
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with
GL-OA-E-020 REV# 10 and GL-RAD-A-021 REV# 20.
Calibration Information:
Quality Control (OC) Information:
Designated QC
The following sample was used for QC: 358744001 (TlO).
Page 45 of73
Technical Information:
Holding Time
All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis
None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Recounts
None ofthe samples in this sample set were recounted.
Miscellaneous Information:
Data Exception (DER) Documentation
Data exception reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced
SOP or contractual documents. A data exception report (DER) was not generated for this SDG.
Additional Comments
Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Qualifier Information
Manual qualifiers were not required.
Method/Analysis Information
Procedure: Dry Weight-Percent Moisture
Analytical Method:
Analytical Batch Number:
ASTM D 2216 (Modified)
1427154
Sample ID
358744021
1203187088
Client ID
E15
358744021(E15) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.
SOP Reference
Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by GEL Laboratories LLC as
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with
GL-OA-E-020 REV# 10.
Calibration Information:
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Designated QC
The following sample was used for QC: 358744021 (E15).
Page 46 of73
Technical Information:
Holding Time
All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis
None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Recounts
None of the samples in this sample set were recounted.
Miscellaneous Information:
Data Exception (DER) Documentation
Data exception reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced
SOP or contractual documents. A data exception report (DER) was not generated for this SDG.
Additional Comments
Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Qualifier Information
Manual qualifiers were not required.
Method/ Analysis Information
Product:
Analytical Method:
Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-241,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS
DOE HASL 300, 4.5.2.3/Ga-01-R
Prep Method: Dry Soil Prep
Analytical Batch Number: 1426803
1426490 Prep Batch Number:
SampleiD
358744001
358744002
358744003
358744004
358744005
358744006
358744007
358744008
358744009
358744010
358744011
358744012
358744013
358744014
Client ID
TlO
D5
M8
H14
X8
FlO
B5
Dll
E2
08
T8
R9
Q12
V7
Page 47 of73
358744015 H16
358744016 S13
358744017 16
358744018 Gll
358744019 17
358744020 F13
1203186197 MB for batch 1426803
1203186199 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
1203186198 35874400l(Tl0) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on a "dry weight" basis.
SOP Reference
Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by GEL Laboratories LLC as
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with
GL-RAD-A-013 REV# 25.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information
All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information
Standard solutions for these analysis are NIST traceable or verified with a NIST traceable standard and used
before the expiration dates.
Sample Geometry
All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Blank Information
The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
Designated QC
The following sample was used for QC: 358744001 (TIO).
QC Information
All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Technical Information:
Holding Time
All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis
None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Recounts
None of the samples in this sample set were recounted.
Miscellaneous Information:
Data Exception (DER) Documentation
Data exception reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced
Page 48 of73
SOP or contractual documents. A data exception report (DER) was not generated for this SDG.
Sample-Specific MDA/MDC
The MD A/MDC reported on the certificate of analysis is a sample-specific MD A/MDC.
Additional Comments
Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Qualifier Information
Manual qualifiers were not required.
Method/Analysis Information
Product: Gammaspec Ra-226 w/ Am-241,Cs-137 and Co-60 LCS
Analytical Method: DOE HASL 300, 4.5.2.3/Ga-01-R
Prep Method: Dry Soil Prep
Analytical Batch Number: 1426814
Prep Batch Number: 1426744
Sample ID
358744021
1203186200
1203186202
1203186201
Client ID
El5
MB for batch 1426814
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
35874402l(El5) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on a "dry weight" basis.
SOP Reference
Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by GEL Laboratories LLC as
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with
GL-RAD-A-013 REV# 25.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information
All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information
Standard solutions for these analysis are NIST traceable or verified with a NIST traceable standard and used
before the expiration dates.
Sample Geometry
All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Page 49 of73
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Blank Information
The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
Designated QC
The following sample was used for QC: 358744021 (E15).
QC Information
All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Technical Information:
Holding Time
All sample procedures for this sample set were perfom1ed within the required holding time.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis
None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Recounts
None of the samples in this sample set were recounted.
Miscellaneous Information:
Data Exception (DER) Documentation
Data exception reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced
SOP or contractual documents. A data exception report (DER) was not generated for this SDG.
Sample-Specific MDA/MDC
The MD A/MDC reported on the certificate of analysis is a sample-specific MD A/MDC.
Additional Comments
Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Qualifier Information
Manual qualifiers were not required.
Certification Statement
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.
Page 50 of73
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone]-www.gel.com
Qualifier Definition Report
for
DNMIOOl Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Client SDG: 358744 GEL Work Order: 358744
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
** Analyte is a surrogate compound
U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
Review/Validation
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data reviewer. In addition, all CLP-like deliverables
receive a third level review of the fractional data package.
The following data validator verified the information presented in this data report:
Signature: r~)d~ Name: Kate Gellatly
Date: 05 NOV 2014 Title: Analyst I
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary Reoort Date: November 5, 2014 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Workorder: 358744
Parmname NOM Sample Qual
Rad Gamma Spec
Batch 1426803
QC1203186198 358744001 DUP
Radium-226 u 0.986
Uncertainty +/-0.1 03
QC1203186199 LCS
Americium-241 491
Uncertainty
Cesium-137 187
Uncertainty
Cobalt-60 208
Uncertainty
Radium-226 u
Uncertainty
QC1203186197 MB
Radium-226 u
Uncertainty
Batch 1426814
QC1203186201 358744021 DUP
Radium-226 u 0.427 u
Uncertainty +/-0.0673
QC 1203186202 LCS
Americium-241 491
Uncertainty
Cesium-137 187
Uncertainty
Cobalt-60 208
Uncertainty
Radium-226 u
Uncertainty
QC 1203186200 MB
Radium-226 u
Uncertainty
Notes:
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (!-sigma).
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
**
<
>
Analyte is a surrogate compound
Result is less than value reported
Result is greater than value reported
The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product
QC Units RPD% ~C%
1.18 pCi/g 17.8
+/-0.0912
510 pCi/g 104
+/-6.61
174 pCi/g 92.8
+/-1.79
191 pCi/g 91.6
+/-2.19
-!.06 pCilg
+/-0.739
0.0166 pCilg
+/-0.0547
~---
0.398 pCilg NIA
+/-0.0749
496 pCi/g 101
+/-6.61
173 pCi/g 92.2
+/-!.83
191 pCi/g 91.9
+/-2.19
-0.224 pCi/g
+/-0.748
0.0216 pCi/g
+/-0.0284
A
B For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank.
Page 72 of73
Page 1 of 2
Range Anlst Date Time
---
(0%-20%) MXR1 11104114 08:41
(75%-125%) 11104/14 06:35
(75%-125%)
(75%-125%)
11/04/14 07:28
---------
N/AMXRl 11/04/14 06:57
(75%-125%) 11104/14 05:24
(75%-125%)
(75%-125%)
11104/14 05:23
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 358744
Parmname NOM Sample Qual c Units RPD%
BD Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low
C Analyte has been continued by GC/MS analysis
D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample
F Estimated Value
H Analytical holding time was exceeded
K Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actual value is expected to be lower.
L Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low. Actual value is expected to be higher.
M M if above MDC and less than LLD
M Matrix Related Failure
N/A RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.
See case narrative
Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative orDER.
Sample results are rejected
Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification
Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification
REC% Range
Nl
ND
NJ
Q
R
u
UI
UJ
UL
X
y
Not considered detected. The associated number is the reported concentration, which may be inaccurate due to a low bias.
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
/\
h
QC Samples were not spiked with this compound
RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.
Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded
Page 2 of 2
nate Time
N/A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike cone. by a factor of 4 or more or %RPD not applicable.
/\The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater than
five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of+/-the
RL is used to evaluate the DUP result.
* Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.
For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.
Page 73 of73
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: December 24,2014
Company :
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
North
362140008
Soil
11-NOV-14 09:15
01-DEC-14
Client
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty
Rad Gamma Spec Analysis
Gammaspec Ra-226 only "Dry Weight Corrected"
Radium-226 U 0.925 +/-0.0975
The followin_g Pre Methods were performed: _____ _
Method Dcscripti n
Dry._o 1 Prep Dry Soil Prep di:::fiAi).A.021
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method DescriptiQg__
I DOE HASL 300, 4.5.2.3/Ga-01-R
Notes:
MDC
0.175
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (1-sigma).
Page 33 of38
RL
1.00
Project:
Client ID:
DNMIOOlll
DNMIOOI
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCi/g MXR1 12/24/14 1052 1440216
Date Time Prep Batch
t2J02114 osos--1440123 ------
Anal st Comments
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone]-www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: December 24, 2014
Company :
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Soil Projects
South
362140009
Soil
11-NOV-14 09:50
01-DEC-14
Client
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty
Rad Gamma Spec Analysis
Gammaspec Ra-226 only "Dry Weight Corrected"
Cesium-13 7 0.136 +/-0.0259
Radium-226 1.52 +/-0.100
The following_ Prep Methods were performed:
Method Description
Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021
The following Analytical Methods were performed: ---
Method Descri""'t::.:io::..::n=----
1 DOE HASL 300, 4.5.2.3/Ga-01-R
Notes:
MDC
0.0618
0.116
RL
0.100
1.00
Analyst
LYTl
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (1-sigma).
Page 34 of38
Project:
Client ID:
DNMIOOlll
DNMIOOl
Units
pCi/g
pCi/g
DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
MXRl 12/24114 1053 1440216
Date Time Prep Batch
12/02/14~----:-:0808 1440123
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: December 24, 2014
Company :
Address :
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
East
362140010
Soil
11-NOV-14 09:30
01-DEC-14
Client
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC --------~----~--
Rad Gamma Spec Analysis
Gammaspec Ra-226 only "Dry Weight Corrected"
Cesium-137 ' 0.537 +/-0.0551 0.0787
Radium-226 1.64 +/-0.0942 0.161
The following Pr~p Methods were performed:
Method Description
Dry Soil Prep Dry oil Pre-p~G~L~-RAo-:-::D--A,..-,-021
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method Description"------
DOE HASL 300, 4.5.2.3/Ga-01-R
Notes:
RL
0.100
1.00
Analyst
L~
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (1-sigma).
Page 35 of38
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00111
DNMI001
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCi/g MXRl 12/24/14 1053 1440216
pCilg
Date Time Prep Batch
12/02/14 0808 1440123
---'An'-= alyst Comments
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone]-www.gel.com
Company :
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Certificate of Analysis
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
West
Report Date: December 24, 2014
Project:
Sample ID: 362140011 Client ID:
DNMIOOlll
DNMIOOl
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Parameter
Rad Gamma Spec Analysis
Soil
11-NOV-14 10:00
01-DEC-14
Client
Result Uncertainty
Gammaspec Ra-226 only "Dry Weight Corrected"
Cesium-137 0.215 +/-0.0294
Radium-226 U 0.723 +/-0.0625
The followin~rer Methods were__performed: ___ _
Method Description
Dry Soil Prep --D1y Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-Q2J
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
MDC
0.0619
0.110
RL
0.100
1.00
Units
pCi/g
pCi/g
Anal st Date
LYT1 --12/02/-14-
DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
MXRl 12/24/14 1053 1440216
Time Prep Batch
08~ 1440123
Method De. cri tlon. __ --~--~­
DOE HASL 300, 4.5 .2.3/Ga-01-R
_ _ An~t Comments _
Notes:
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (!-sigma).
Page 36 of38
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: December 24, 2014
Company :
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project: ---Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
B5
362140004
Soil
11-NOV-14 07:23
01-DEC-14
Client
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty
Rad Gamma Spec Analysis
Gammaspec Ra-226 only "Dry Weight Corrected"
Radium-226 U 0.646 +/-0.0922
The following Prep Methods were_ performed:
MDC
0.127
RL
1.00
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00111
DNMIOOl
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCifg MXRI 12/24114 1050 1440216
Method Description
Dry Soil Prep Dry . oil Prep GL-RAD-A-021
Aual~st Date Time Prep Batch
-Lvn --m oif-J4----=o8o8 1440123
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method Description __ Analyst ~omments_
DOE HASL 300, 4.5.2.3/Ga-01-R
Notes:
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (1-sigma).
Page 29 of38
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: December 24, 2014
Company :
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
E2
362140005
Soil
11-NOV-14 07:20
01-DEC-14
Client
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty
Rad Gamma Spec Analysis
Gammaspec Ra-226 only "Dry Weight Corrected"
Radium-226 U 0.897 +/-0.107
The following Prep Methods were performed:
Method Description
Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
MDC
0.177
RL
1.00
Analyst
LYTI
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00111
DNMI001
Units
pCi/g
Date
12/02114
DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
MXRI 12/24/14 1051 1440216
Time Prep Batch
0808 1440123
Method Descriptio~n~--------------------------------------~An~a~lv~s~t~C~o~mm~~en~t~s ____________________ __
DOE HASL 300, 4.5.2.3/Ga-01-R
Notes:
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (1-sigma).
Page 30 of38
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company :
Address :
Contact:
Project:
Parameter
Metals Analysis-ICP-MS
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
FlO
362140003
Soil
24-NOV-14 12:20
01-DEC-14
Client
6.79%
Qualifier Result ---
SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium Solid "Dry Weight Corrected"
llim~m 7.~
The followin Prep Methods were erformed
Method Description
SW846 3050B ICP-MS 3050BS PREP
Description
SW846 3050B/6020A
Page 17 of38
SRL
1.00
Analyst
KXP3
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: December 22, 2014
DNMIOOlll
DNMIOOI
362140
CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
1.00 mg/kg 2 BCD! 12/10/14 14:52 1439964 1
Date Time Prep Batch
1439963 12/01114 1140
Analyst Comments
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company :
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
Fl3
362140006
Soil
11-NOV-14 07:12
01-DEC-14
Client
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC __ ....;:__
Rad Gamma Spec Analysis
Gamrnaspec Ra-226 only "Dry Weight Con-ected"
RL
Radium-226 1.58 +/-0.117 0.160 1.00
The following Prep Methods were performed: __ _
Method [)e"criplion
Dry .oil Prep Dry Soil Prep G[::::RAi:).;.\-02 1
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method___ Description
I DOE HASL 300, 4.5.2.3/Ga-01-R
Notes:
Analyst
LYTl
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (1-sigma).
Page 31 of38
Report Date: December 24,2014
Project:
Client ID:
DNMIOOlll
DNMIOOl
Units
pCi/g
Date
12/02/1 4
DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
MXR1 12/24/14 1051 1440216
Time Prep Batch
0808 1440123
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company ; Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Matrix:
R9
362140002
Soil
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
24-NOV-14 12:10
01-DEC-14
Collector: Client
Moisture: 7.43% ---
Parameter Qualifier Result
Metals Analysis-ICP-MS
SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium Solid "Dry Weight Corrected"
Uranium 4.94
The following_ Prep Methods were erformed
Method Description
SW846 3050B ICP-MS 3050BS PREP
The following Analytical Methods were erformed
Method Description
SW846 3050B/6020A
Page 16 of38
SRL
1.00
Analyst
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: December 22, 2014
DNMI00111
DNMIOOI
362140
CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
1.00 mg/kg 2 BCD! 12/10/14 14:45 1439964 I
Date Time Prep Batch ------KXP3 12/01/14 1140 1439963
Analyst Comments
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www .gel. com
Certificate of Analysis
Company :
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
R9
362140002
Soil
24-NOV-14 12:10
01-DEC-14
Client
7.43%
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty
Rad Gamma Spec Analysis
Gammaspec Ra-226 only "Dry Weight Corrected"
Radium-226 4.63 +/-0.174
MDC
0.206
The following Pre Methods were {'erformed: ______ _
Method De criplion
Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021
The following Analytical Methods were performed: ------
RL
1.00
Analyst
LYT1
Project:
Client ID:
Report Date: December 24, 2014
DNMIOOlll
DNMIOOl
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCi/g MXR1 12/24/14 1050 1440216
Date Time Prep Batch
12/02/14 0808 1440123
Method Descri~p.!!ti~on~------------------Anl!Jvst Comments
1 DOE HASL 300, 4.5.2.3/Ga-01-R
Notes:
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (1-sigma).
Page 28 of38
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Parameter
Metals Analysis-ICP-MS
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
08
362140001
Soil
11-NOV-14 07:10
01-DEC-14
Client
4.15%
Qualifier Result
SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium Solid "Dry Weight Corrected"
Uranium 2.45
The followin Prep Methods were erform;::ed.::..___ _ __
Method Description
SW846 3050B ICP-MS 3050BS PREP
The followin_,g Analytical Methods were erformed
Method Description
SW846 3050B/6020A
Page 15 of38
SRL
1.00
Analyst
KXP3
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: December 22,2014
DNMI00111
DNMI001
362140
CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
1.00 mg/kg
Date
12/01/14
2 BCD! 12/10/14 13:50 1439964 I
Time
1140
Prep Batch
1439963
Analyst Comments
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Company :
Address :
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Certificate of Analysis
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
08
Report Date: December 24, 2014
Project:
Sample ID: 362140001 Client ID:
DNMIOOlll
DNMIOOI
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
-----
Soil
11-NOV-14 07:10
01-DEC-14
Client
4.15%
Parameter Qualifier __ Result Uncertainty MDC RL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
Rad Gamma Spec Analysis
Gammaspec Ra-226 only "Dry Weight Corrected"
Radium-226 3.44 +/-0.170 0.210 1.00 pCilg MXR1 12/24/14 1050 1440216
The followin£ Prep Methods were erformed: _____ _
Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch
Dry oll Prep Dry oll Prep GL-RAD-A-021 L YTI-----r"02114 0808 1440123
The following Analytical Methods were performed: ___ _
-~~-------------Method Description __ _ __ Anal ~~ Comments
I DOE HASL 300, 4.5.2.3/Ga-01-R
Notes:
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (1-sigma).
Page 27 of38
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone]-www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: December 24, 2014
Company :
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Soil Projects
V7
362140007
Soil
11-NOV-14 07:00
01-DEC-14
Client
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty
Rad Gamma Spec Analysis
Gammaspec Ra-226 only "Dry Weight Corrected"
Radium-226 4.86 +/-0.190
MDC
0.289
The following Prep Methods were }J'-e_r_fo_rm_e_d_: ---------
RL
1.00
Method Description Analyst
Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 LYTl
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00111
DNMI001
Units DF Annl¥St Date Time Batch Method
pCi/g MXR1 12/24/14 1051 1440216
Date Time Prep Batch 12/0~2!'"'"14~---oo'""8""'o8,_-c-147"04.;.o1""'2c=-3--------
Method DescriPtion ------------------'An'""""a::.:..rl st CQ._mments ___ _
DOE HASL 300, 4.5.2.3/Ga-01-R
Notes:
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (1-sigma).
Page 32 of38
[iJijl f Laboratories LLC
a member of The GEL Group INC PO Box 30712 Charleston, SC 29417
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407
P 843.556.8171 F 843.766.1178
December 24,2014
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Re: Soil Projects
Work Order: 362140
Dear Ms. Weinel:
GEL Laboratories, LLC (GEL) appreciates the opportunity to provide the enclosed analytical results for the
sample(s) we received on December 01, 2014. This original data report has been prepared and reviewed in
accordance with GEL's standard operating procedures.
Our policy is to provide high quality, personalized analytical services to enable you to meet your analytical needs
on time every time. We trust that you will find everything in order and to your satisfaction. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 4487.
Enclosures
Sincerely,
Sylainna Rivers
Project Manager
www.gel.com
Page 2 of38
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Soil Projects
SDG: 362140
Page 3 of38
December 24,2014
Laboratory Identification:
GEL Laboratories LLC
2040 Savage Road
Charleston, South Carolina 29407
[phone]
Summary:
Receipt Narrative
for
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
SDG: 362140
Sample receipt: The samples arrived at GEL Laboratories LLC, Charleston, South Carolina on December 01,
2014 for analysis. The samples were delivered with proper chain of custody documentation and signatures. All
sample containers arrived without any visible signs of tampering or breakage. There are no additional comments
concerning sample receipt.
Sample Identification: The laboratory received the following samples:
Laboratory ID Client ID
362140001 08
362140002 R9
362140003 FlO
362140004 B5
362140005 E2
362140006 Fl3
362140007 V7
362140008 North
362140009 South
362140010 East
362140011 West
Case Narrative:
Sample analyses were conducted using methodology as outlined in GEL's Standard Operating Procedures. Any
technical or administrative problems during analysis, data review, and reduction are contained in the analytical
case narratives in the enclosed data package.
Page 4 of38
The enclosed data package contains the following sections: Case Narrative, Chain of Custody, Cooler Receipt
Checklist, Data Package Qualifier Definitions and data from the following fractions: Metals and Radiochemistry.
Sylainna Rivers
Project Manager
Sheet 1 of 1
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Samples Shipped to: Gel Laboratories Contact: Kathy Weinel ~~~~~~~-------------2040 Savage Road Ph: 303.389.4134
Charleston~ SC 29407 [e-mail]
Chain of Custody/Sampling Analysis Request
Project Samplers Name ~piers ·Signature
Robert's Pond David Turk I /~ j ;/J/(
•
Time
Sample ID Date Collected Collected Laboratory Analysis Requested
08 11/11/2014 07:10 U and Ra226
R9 11/24/2014 12:10 U and Ra226
F10 11 /24/2014 12:20 u
B5 11/11/2014 07:23 Ra226
E2 11/11/2014 07:20 Ra226
F13 11/11/2014 07:12 Ra226
V7 11/11/2014 07:00 Ra226
North 11/11/2014 09:15 Ra226
South 11/11/2014 09:50 Ra226
East 11/11/2014 09:30 Ra226
West 11/11/2014 10:00 Ra226
Comments: Please send report to Kathy Weinel at [e-mail]
Page 5 of38
Date/Time Rec 1\ted By:(Signature)
Jl/U/Z.CJI1
1300
DatelTime
i~z..o
I I I'(
Date/Time
D I Laboratories LLC SAMPLE RECEIPT & REVIEW FORM
Client: 1\;JfYJ:! SDG/AR/COC/Work Order: :~I.e 'd...\ L\.{)
Received By: SHANT A MACK 'Dnle Ru.elvcil; , l-/-t'f. (P 'i· t_y
Suspected Hazard Information 1:1 0 •IfNet Counts> IOOcpm on samples tilrrmarked "radioactive", contact the Radiation Safety Group for further > z investigation.
COC/Samples marked as radioactive? -Maximwn Net Counts Observed• (Observed Counts -Area Background Counts): ;~ l/ t..P(I•·v
Classified Radioactive U or Ill by RSO? -Jrycs, Were. swipes taken of sample contatiners <action levels?
COC/Samples marked containing PCBs? -Package, COC, and/or Samples marked as -beryllium or asbestos containing? If )1~, ~ntplr:s are to bc.·scgrcgC!Ued as Snfol}( Controlled Samples, and 11Jl£ncd by_ the CillL Safety Oro Up.
Shipped as a DOT Hazardous? Hazard Class Shipped: UN#:
Samples identified as Foreign Soil? -
Sample Receipt Criteria ~ ~ ~ "'· ~edfor .. Jltems)
Shipping containers received intact Circle :
l and sealed? 1 .......... Seals broken DBI1laged container Leaking container Other (describe)
Samples requiring cold preservation Preservation Method: Icc bags Blue ice Dry ic~ Olhcr (describe)
2 within (0 ~ 6 deg. C)?• -•an temperatures nrc recorded in j (
!Daily check perfonned and passed on 1 ompcr.>•u•t Dr:vlcc Serial tr, t30532792
la IJR t .. mn .. rotnre gun? -!Sccanduy Tempcrsturc Device Scrinl #(If Applicable):
I Chain of custody documents included I with shipment? /
Circle Applicable:
Sample containers intact and sealed? .-Seals broken Damaged container Leaking container Other (describe)
Samples requiring chemical !Sample JD's, containers affected and observed pH:
5 preservation at proper pH? 1-1 added. Lot#:
VOA vials free ofheadspace (defined ISnmplc JD'g·ond containc~ nffnctcd:
6 as< 6mm bubble)? -l<lr)'c•, ~ dcJlver l Volntilcs laborstory)
7 Are Encore containers present? ....-
liD's and tests affected:
8 Samples received within holding time: -
Sample ID's on COC match ID's on !Sampl~ ill's and containers affected:
9 bottles? .-
Date & time on COC match date & !Sample ill's affected:
10 time on bottles? .-
11 Number of containers received match 1S~mplc.ID'4 11/Tcctcd:
nwnber indicated on COC? --
12 I Are sample containers identifiable as
GEL provided?
13 COC fonn is properly signed in
•· ",.,,_.,,.,,_.,.sections?
FedEx Air FcdEx Ground ~&. · Field S~rvices Courier Other
I Li87 lf '1 ~ 031'23S-~q s -s-
14 Carrier and tracking number. I 7) 1'1 V '! ~ b'3iOS" '2.) f'qb
12..1 ~1 't't"f 0 '3 ~~ ob yqG7
l"'u""""'"~ (Use Continuation Form if needed):
I
PM (or PMA) review: Initials ~ JV -.:r-r Date • \aj~ \ ~ Page_\_ ofj_ GL-CH L-SR-00 1
• I
Page 6 of38
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
GEL Work Order/SDG: 362140
Client SDG: 362140
Robert's Pond
Project Manager:
Project Name:
Purchase Order:
Package Level:
EDD Format:
Sylainna Rivers
DNMI00111 Soil Projects
LEVEL3
EIM_DNMI
GELID Client Sample ID Client Sample Desc.
362140001 08
362140002 R9
362140003 F10
362140004 85
362140005 E2
362140006 F13
362140007 V7
362140008 North
362140009 South
362140010 East
362140011 West
Client Sample ID Status Tests/Methods
-001 08 REVW Gammaspec Ra-226 only
REVW SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium
Solid
-002 R9 REVW Gammaspec Ra-226 only
REVW SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium
Solid
-003 F10 REVW SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium
Solid
-004 85 REVW Gammaspec Ra-226 only
-005 E2 REVW Gammaspec Ra-226 only
-006 F13 REVW Gammas pee Ra-226 only
-007 V7 REVW Gammaspec Ra-226 only
-008 North REVW Gammaspec Ra-226 only
-009 South REVW Gammaspec Ra-226 only
-010 East REVW Gammas pee Ra-226 only
-011 West REVW Gammaspec Ra-226 only
Collect
Date & Time
11-NOV-14 07:10
24-NOV-14 12:10
24-NOV-14 12:20
11-NOV-14 07:23
11-NOV-14 07:20
11-NOV-14 07:12
11-NOV-14 07:00
11-NOV-14 09:15
11-NOV-14 09:50
11-NOV-14 09:30
11-NOV-14 10:00
Product
Reference
Report Date: 24-DEC-14
Work Order: 362140
Page 1 of 2
Work Order Due Date: 29-DEC-14 Collector: C
Package Due Date:
EDD Due Date:
Due Date:
SXK1
Receive Time #of
Date & Time Zone Cont.
01-0EC-14 09:20 -2 ,
01-0EC-14 09:20 -2 ,
01-0EC-14 09:20 -2 1
01-0EC-14 09:20 -2 1
01-0EC-14 09:20 -2 1
01-0EC-14 09:20 -2 1
01-0EC-14 09:20 -2 1
01-0EC-14 09:20 -2 1
01-0EC-14 09:20 -2 1
01-0EC-14 09:20 -2 I
01-0EC-14 09:20 -2 1:
Fax Date PM Comments
12-17-14
12-17-14
12-17-14
26-DEC-14
28-DEC-14
29-DEC-14
Lab
Prelogin #: 20141224463
Project Workdef ID: 1352217
SDG Status: Closed
Logged by:
Fax Days to
Matrix Due Date Process Cote#
Prelog Lab Field
Group QC QC
SOIL 28
SOIL 28
SOIL 28 2
SOIL 28 3
SOIL 28 3
SOIL 28 3
SOIL 28 3
SOIL 28 3
SOIL 28 3
SOIL 28 3
SOIL 28 3
Receive
Aux Data Codes
Temperature (C) 21
Temperature (C) 21
Temperature (C) 21
Temperature (C) 21
Temperature (C) 21
Temperature (C) 21
Temperature (C) 21
Temperature (C) 21
Temperature (C) 21
Temperature (C) 21
Temperature (C) 21 00 M c.,...
0
r-
v e:ll)
C':l ~
GEL Laboratories LLC-Login Review Report
Product: GSCGAMMS Workdef ID: 1352218 In Product Group? No
Method: DOE HASL 300, 4.5.2.3/Ga-01-R
Product Description: Gammaspec Ra-226 only
Samples: 001, 002, 004, 005, 006, 007, 008, 009, 010, 011
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS#
14596-10-2
10045-97-3
10198-40-0
13982-63-3
Parmname
Americium-241
Cesium-137
Cobalt-60
Radium-226
Product: MIM50B20AUS Workdef ID: 1352219
Method: SW846 3050B/6020A
Product Description: SW846 3050B/6020A Uranium Solid
Samples: 001, 002, 003
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS# Parmname
7440-61-1 Uranium
In Product Group? No
Action Product Name Description
Contingent
Tests
Login Requirements:
Requirement
Group Name:
Client RDL or
PQL & Unit
.1
Group Name:
Client RDL or
PQL & Unit
1
Samples
Reporting
Units
pCi/g
pCi/g
pCi/g
pCi/g
Reporting
Units
mg/kg
Include? Comments
Peer Review by: _____ :::..._ ______ _ Work Order (SDG#), PO# Checked?_~---
Report Date: 24-DEC-14
Work Order: 362140
Page 2 of 2
Group Reference:
Path: Standard
Product Reference:
Moisture Correction: "Dry Weight Corrected"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
SPIKE N y Yes
SPIKE N y
SPIKE N y
REG y y
Group Reference:
Path: Standard
Product Reference:
Moisture Correction: "Dry Weight Corrected"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
REG y y Yes
C of C signed in receiver location? _____ _
00 M ....... 0
00
<!) ~ ~
List of current GEL Certifications as of 24 December 2014
-Stntc Ccrtlficntlou
Alaska UST-110
Arkansas 88-0651
CLIA 42D0904046
Ct~Iifomia 2940 Interim
Colomdo SC000!2
Connecticut PH-0169
Delaware SC000122013-10
DoD ELAP/ IS017025 A2LA 2567.01
Florida NELAP E87156
Foreign Soils Permit P330-12-00283,P330-12-00284
Georgia SC00012
Georgiu SDW A 967
Hawaii SCOOOI22013-!0
Idaho Chemistry SCOOOI2
Idaho Raqlochcmi~>try SC00012
Illinois NELAP 200029
Indiana C-SC-01
Kansas NELAP E-10332
Kentucky 90129
Louisiana NELAP 03046 (AI33904)
Louisiana SDWA LAJ30005
Matyhmd 270
Massacllllsc!ls M-SC012
Michigan 9976
Mississippi SC000122013-10
Nebraska NE-OS-26-13
-Nc~ada SC0001220l4-l
New Hampshire NELAP 2054
New Jersey NELAP SC002
New Mexico SC000l2
New York NELAP 11501
North Carolina 233
North Carolina SDWA 45709
Oklahoma 9904
Penn sylvania NELAP 68-00485
Plant Material Permit PDEP-12-00260
South Carolina Chemistry 10120001
South Carolina GVL 23611001
South Carolina Radiochemi 10120002
Temessee TN 02934
TexasNELAP T104704235-14-9
UtahNELAP SC000122014-16
Vermont VT87156
Virginia NELAP 460202
Wtishlngton C780-12
Wjscon~in 999887790
Page 9 of38
Page 10 of38
Sample ID
362140001
362140002
362140003
1203219735
1203219736
1203219739
1203219737
1203219738
Sample Analysis
Client ID
08
R9
FlO
Metals Fractional Narrative
Energy Fuels Resources (DNMI)
SDG 362140
Method Blank (MB)ICP-MS
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
362140001(08L) Serial Dilution (SD)
362140001(08D) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
362140001(08S) Matrix Spike (MS)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on a "dry weight" basis.
Method/Analysis Information
Analytical Batch: 1439964
Prep Batch: 1439963
Standard Operating Procedures: GL-MA-E-014 REV# 25 and GL-MA-E-009 REV# 24
Analytical Method: SW846 3050B/6020A
Prep Method : SW846 3050B
Preparation/Analytical Method Verification
The SOP stated above has been prepared based on technical research and testing conducted by GEL Laboratories,
LLC and with guidance from the regulatory documents listed in this "Method/Analysis Information" section.
System Configuration
Tbe Metals analysis -ICPMS was performed on a Perkin Elmer ELAN DRC-e inductively coupled plasma mass
spectrometer (ICP-MS). The instrument is equipped with a · ros -now nebulizer quadrup lc mn s . pectromcter, and
dual mode electron multiplier detector, and dynamic reaction eel!. Th DR -e usc a dynamic reaction cell to
eliminate polyatomic interferences. Internal standards of scandium, gern1anium, indiun1, tantalum, and1or lutetium
were utilized to cover the mass spectrum. Operating conditions are set at 1400W power and combined argon pressures
of 360+/-7 kPa for the plasma and auxiliary gases, and 0.85 Llmin carrier gas flow, and an initial lens voltage of 5.2.
Calibration Information
Instrument Calibration
All initial calibration requirements have been met for this sample delivery group (SDG).
Page 11 of38
CRDL/PQL Requirements
The CRDLIPQL standard recoveries met the referenced advisory control limits.
ICSA/ICSAB Statement
All interference check samples (ICSA and ICSAB) associated with this SDG met the established acceptance criteria.
Continuing Calibration Blanks (CCB) Requirements
All continuing calibration blanks (CCB) bracketing this batch met the established acceptance criteria.
Continuing Calibration Verification (CCV) Requirements
All continuing calibration verifications (CCV) bracketing this SDG met the acceptance criteria.
Quality Control (QC) Information
Method Blank (MB) Statement
The MB analyzed with this SDG met the acceptance criteria.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) Recovery
The LCS spike recoveries met the acceptance limits.
Quality Control (QC) Sample Statement
The following sample was selected as the quality control (QC) sample for this SDG: 362140001 (08).
Matrix Spike (MS) Recovery Statement
The percent recoveries (%R) obtained from the MS analyses are evaluated when the sample concentration is less than
four times (4X) the spike concentration added. All applicable analytes met the acceptance criteria.
Duplicate Relative Percent Difference (RPD) Statement
The RPD obtained from the designated sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated based on acceptance criteria of 20%
when the sample is >5X the contract required reporting limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value
is less than 5X the RL, a control of +/-RL is used to evaluate the DUP results. All applicable analytes met these
requirements.
Serial Dilution % Difference Statement
The serial dilution is used to assess matrix suppression or enhancement. Raw element concentrations 25x the
IDL/MDL for CV AA, 50 X the IDL/MDL for ICP and I OOX the IDL/MDL for ICP-MS analyses are applicable for
serial dilution assessment. All applicable analytes met the established acceptance percent difference criteria.
Technical Information
Holding Time Specifications
GEL assigns holding times based on the associated methodology. Holding time is measured by comparison of the date
and time of sample collection to the date and time of sample preparation and analysis. Those holding times expressed
in hours are calculated in the AlphaLIMS system. Those holding times expressed as days expire at midnight on the
day of expiration. All samples in this SDG met the specified holding time.
Preparation/ Analytical Method Verification
All procedures were performed as stated in the SOP. Method SW-846 305GB is not a total digestion technique for
most samples. It is a very strong acid digestion that will dissolve almost all elements that could become
environmentally available. By design, elements bound in silicate structures are not normally dissolved by this
procedure as they are not usually mobile in the environment.
Page 12 of38
Sample Dilutions
Dilutions are performed to minimize matrix interferences resulting from elevated mineral element concentrations
present in solid samples and/or to bring over range target analyte concentrations into the linear calibration range of the
instrument. The ICPMS solid samples in this SDG were diluted the standard two times.
Preparation Information
The samples in this SDG were prepared exactly according to the cited SOP.
Miscellaneous Information
Electronic Packaging Comment
This data package was generated using an electronic data processing program referred to as virtual packaging. In an
effort to increase quality and efficiency, the laboratory has developed systems to generate all data packages
electronically. The following change from traditional packages should be noted:
Analyst/peer reviewer initials and dates are not present on the electronic data files. Presently, all initials and dates are
present on the original raw data. These hard copies are temporarily stored in the laboratory. An electronic signature
page inserted after the case narrative will include the data validator's signature and title. The signature page also
includes the data qualifiers used in the fractional package. Data that are not generated electronically, such as hand
written pages, will be scanned and inserted into the electronic package.
Data Exception (DER) Documentation
Data exception reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or
contractual documents. Data exception reports were included behind the Case Narrative or in the Miscellaneous Data
section of this data package. A data exception report was not required for this SDG.
Additional Comments
Additional comments were not required for this SDG.
Page 13 of38
Certification Statement
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.
Review Validation:
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data validator. In addition, all data designated for CLP or
CLP-Iike packaging will receive a third level validation upon completion of the data package.
The following data validator verified the information presented in this case narrative:
Revie\ er: 'l)lli .~J.S~ Dat_,.....:.__k)~_/4...:....___ __
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone]-www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis Report
for
DNMI001 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Client SDG: 362140 GEL Work Order: 362140
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
** Analyte is a surrogate compound
U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
U Metals--Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the greater of either the MDL or the CRDL.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the Certificate of Analysis.
The designation ND, if present, appears in the result column when the analyte concentration is not detected above
the limit as defined in the 'U' qualifier above.
This data report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with GEL Laboratories LLC
standard operating procedures. Please direct any questions to your Project Manager, Sylainna Rivers.
Reviewed by
Page 14 of38
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407-[phone]-www.gel.com
QC Summary Reoort Date: December 22, 2014 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Workorder: 362140
-----Pamu!!!._me NOM ......!!!Jl(l!t;. Qual c nil RPDtD% REC%
Metals Analysis-ICPMS
Batch 1439964 -------
QC1203219737 362140001 DUP
Uranium
QC1203219736 LCS
Uranium 4.84
QCI203219735 MB
Uranium
QCI203219738 362140001 MS
Uranium 5.07
QCJ203219739 362140001 SDILT
Uranium
Notes:
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
**
<
>
Analyte is a surrogate compound
Result is less than value reported
Result is greater than value reported
The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product
2.45 2.58 mg/kg 5.00 A
4.91 mg/kg
u 1.00 mg/kg
2.45 7.44 mglkg
12.2 2.51 ug!L 3.07
For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank.
Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis
Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample
Metals--%difference of sample and SD is >I 0%. Sample concentration must meet flagging criteria
Estimated Value
101
98.4
Ji!!.!!l;.C Anlst
(+/-1.00) BCD!
(80%-120%)
(75%-125%)
(0%-10%)
Page 1 of 2
Date Time
12/10/14 13:56
12/10/14 13 :29
12/10/14 13:22
12/10/14 14:03
12/10/14 14:17
A
B
c
D
E
F
FB Mercury was found present at quantifiable concentrations in field blanks received with these samples. Data associated with the blank are deemed
invalid for reporting to regulatory agencies
H
M
N
Analytical holding time was exceeded
Matrix Related Failure
Metals--The Matrix spike sample recovery is not within specified control limits
N/A RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.
Nl See case narrative
ND Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit
NJ Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
Page 18 of38
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 362140
Q
R
u
u
X
y
A
h
NOM ampl~_; Qual QC Units RPD/D% REC%
One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative orDER.
Sample results are rejected
Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
Metals--Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the greater of either the MDL or the CRDL.
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
QC Samples were not spiked with this compound
R:tnge Anlst
RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.
Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded
Page 2 of 2
Date Time
N/ A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exccccls spike cone. by a factor of 4 or more or %RPD noL applicable.
A The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate UP) i • C\:aluat~d against the acceptance criteria wh¢n the sample is greater than
five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the R:L. 3 () ntr 'Ill mil of+/-the
RL is used to evaluate the DUP result. ·
* Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.
For PS, PSD, and SDIL T results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.
Page 19 of38
Page 20 of38
Radiochemistry Case Narrative
Energy Fuels Resources (DNMI)
SDG362140
Method/ Analysis Information
Product: Dry Weight-Percent Moisture
Analytical Method: Dry Soil Prep
Analytical Batch Number: 1440123
Sample ID ClientiD
362140001 08
362140002 R9
362140004 B5
362140005 E2
362140006 Fl3
362140007 V7
362140008 North
362140009 South
362140010 East
362140011 West
1203220257 362140001(08) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.
SOP Reference
Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by GEL Laboratories LLC as
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with
GL-OA-E-020 REV# 10 and GL-RAD-A-021 REV# 20.
Calibration Information:
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Designated QC
The following sample was used for QC: 362140001 (08).
Technical Information:
Holding Time
All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Miscellaneous Information:
Data Exception (DER) Documentation
Data exception reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced
SOP or contractual documents. A data exception report (DER) was not generated for this SDG.
Page 21 of38
Additional Comments
Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Qualifier Information
Manual qualifiers were not required.
Method/ Analysis Information
Procedure: Dry Weight-Percent Moisture
Analytical Method:
Analytical Batch Number:
ASTM D 2216 (Modified)
1440146
Sample ID
362140003
1203220307
Client ID
FlO
362140003(Fl0) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.
SOP Reference
Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by GEL Laboratories LLC as
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with
GL-OA-E-020 REV# 10.
Calibration Information:
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Designated QC
The following sample was used for QC: 362140003 (F 1 0).
Technical Information:
Holding Time
All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Miscellaneous Information:
Data Exception (DER) Documentation
Data exception reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced
SOP or contractual documents. A data exception report (DER) was not generated for this SDG.
Additional Comments
Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Page 22 of38
Qualifier Information
Manual qualifiers were not required.
Method/ Analysis Information
Product: Gammaspec Ra-226 only
Analytical Method: DOE HASL 300, 4.5.2.3/Ga-01-R
Prep Method: Dry Soil Prep
Analytical Batch Number: 1440216
1440123 Prep Batch Number:
Sample lD Client ID
362140001 08
362140002 R9
362140004 B5
362140005 E2
362140006 Fl3
362140007 V7
362140008 North
362140009 South
362140010 East
362140011 West
1203220483 MB for batch 1440216
1203220485 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
1203220484 362140001(08) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on a "dry weight" basis.
SOP Reference
Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by GEL Laboratories LLC as
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with
GL-RAD-A-013 REV# 25.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information
All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information
Standard solutions for these analysis are NIST traceable or verified with a NIST traceable standard and used
before the expiration dates.
Sample Geometry
All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Page 23 of38
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Blank Information
The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
Designated QC
The following sample was used for QC: 362140001 (08).
QC Information
All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Technical Information:
Holding Time
All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis
None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Recounts
N~ne of the samples in this sample set were recounted.
Miscellaneous Information:
Data Exception (DER) Documentation
Data exception reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced
SOP or contractual documents. A data exception report (DER) was not generated for this SDG.
Sample-Specific MDA/MDC
The MD A/MDC reported on the certificate of analysis is a sample-specific MD A/MDC.
Additional Comments
Cs-137 was positively identified in samples 362140009 (South), 362140010 (East) and 362140011 (West) and
added to the batch.
Qualifier Information
Manual qualifiers were not required.
Certification Statement
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.
Page 24 of38
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone]-www.gel.com
Qualifier Definition Report
for
DNMIOOl Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Client SDG: 362140 GEL Work Order: 362140
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
** Analyte is a surrogate compound
U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
Review/Validation
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data reviewer. In addition, all CLP-like deliverables
receive a third level review of the fractional data package.
The following data validator verified the information presented in this data report:
Signature: .:;J~ ~
Date: 24 DEC 2014
Name: Theresa Austin
Title: Group Leader
Batch: 1440146
Analyst: L YTI
Moisture LogBook
Date/Time: 02-DEC-2014
Procedure Code DRY WEIGHT
Procedure Description Dry Weight-Percent Moisture
Lab Sop: GL-OA-E-020
Sample Sample Original Instrument
ld Type Hsn -362140003 SAMPLE BALHD2000D
1203220307 DUP 362140003 BALHD2000D
Evaporative Loss LogBook
Page 25 of38
Run Time Container
Wt
08:08 7.16
08:08 7.223 -
Comments:
Sample St
DUP
Initial Final Wt
Wt (g)
27.855 26.45
23.845 22.726
Sample ld
1203220307
Net Initial
Wt(g)
20.695
16.622
Rpd(%)
.844
Net Final
Wt(g)
19.29
15.503
A) Result= (Net Initial-Net Final) /Net Initial * 100
Moisture
(%)
6.79
6.73
Note: Aliquot is used for the determination of the effective MDL and PQL in LIMS
GEL Laboratories LLC
Batch: 1440123
Analyst: L YTI
Dateffime: 02-DEC-2014
Procedure Code DRY WEIGHT_PREPD
Moisture LogBook
Procedure Description Dry Weight-Percent Moisture Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021
Lab Sop: GL-OA-E-020 GL-RAD-A-021
Sample Sample Original Instrument Run Time Container
ld Type Hsn Wt
362140001 -SAMPLE BALHD2000D 08:08 13.617
362140002 SAMPLE BALHD2000D 08:08 13.642
362140004 SAMPLE BALHD2000D 08:08 13.615
362140005 SAMPLE BALHD2000D 08:08 13.659
362140006 SAMPLE BALHD2000D 08:08 13.639
362140007 SAMPLE BALHD2000D 08:08 13.585
362140008 SAMPLE BALHD2000D 08:08 13.575
362140009 SAMPLE BALHD2000D 08:08 13.569
362140010 SAMPLE BALHD2000D 08:08 13.582
362140011 SAMPLE BALHD2000D 08:08 13.604
1203220257 DUP 362140001 BALHD2000D 08:08 7.103
Comments:
Initial Final Wt
Wt (g) -670.35 643.11
557.27 516.88
468 431.66
540.47 490.61
590.28 559.35
496.58 440.41
481.53 473.32
580.04 570.06
725.6 715.13
621.75 609.07
27.179 26.357
Net Initial
Wt(g)
656.733
543.628
454.385
526.811
576.641
482.995
467.955
566.471
712.018
608.146
20.076
Sample St
DUP
Net Final
Wt(g)
629.493
503.238
418.045
476.951
545.711
426.825
459.745
556.491
701.548
595.466
19.254
A) Result= (Net Initial-Net Final) /Net Initial * I 00
Sample ld
1203220257
Moisture
(%)
4.15
7.43
8
9.46
5.36
11.6
1.75
1.76
1.47
2.09
4.09
Note: Aliquot is used for the determination of the effective MDL and PQL in LIMS
Evaporative Loss LogBook GEL Laboratories LLC
Page 26 of38
Rpd(%)
1.295
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Contact:
Workorder:
Parmname
Rad Gamma Spec
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado
Ms. Kathy Weinel
362140
---NOM
Batch 1440216
QC 1203220484
Cesium-137
Radium-226
QCI203220485
Americium-241
Cesium-137
Cobalt-60
Radium-226
QC1203220483
Cesium-137
Radium-226
Notes:
362140001
LCS
MB
DUP
u
Uncertainty
Uncertainty
491
Uncertainty
187
Uncertainty
204
Uncertainty
Uncertainty
Uncertainty
Uncertainty
Sample Qual
-0.0609 u
+/-0.034
3.44
+/-0.170
u
u
u
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (!-sigma).
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
**
<
>
Analyte is a surrogate compound
Result is less than value reported
Result is greater than value reported
The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product
QC Units
-0.045 pCi/g
+/-0.0368
3.77 pCi/g
+/-0.157
508 pCi/g
+/-2.60
, 183 pCi/g
+/-1.61
187 pCi/g
+/-1.91
-0.0979 pCilg
+/-0.623
-0.00402 pCi/g
+/-0.0114
-0.00886 pCi/g
+/-0.0268
RPD%
N/A
9.17
A
B
BD
c
D
F
H
K
L
M
M
For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank.
Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low
Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis
Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample
Estimated Value
Analytical holding time was exceeded
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actual value is expected to be lower.
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low. Actual value is expected to be higher.
M if above MDC and less than LLD
Matrix Related Failure
Page 37 of38
Reuort Date: December 24, 2014
Page 1 of 2
REC% Ran_g£ Anlst Date Time
N/A MXRl 12/24/14 II :52
(0%-20%)
103 (75%-125%) 12/24/14 I 0:54
97.8 (75%-125%)
91.7 (75%-125%)
12/24/14 I 0:54
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 362140
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPD% REC% R;_l_!! c Anlst
N/A RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.
Nl
ND
NJ
Q
R
u
UI
UJ
UL
X
y
1\
h
See case narrative
Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative orDER.
Sample results are rejected
Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification
Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification
Not considered detected. The associated number is the reported concentration, which may be inaccurate due to a low bias.
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
QC Samples were not spiked with this compound
RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.
Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded
Page 2 of 2
Date Time
N/A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exccc1l spike c nc. by a factor of 4 or more or %RPD not applicable.
"The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate DUP) is c aluated a •ainst the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater than
five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of+/-the
RL is used to evaluate the DUP result. * Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.
For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.
Page 38 of38
TabB
On-site Laboratory Analytical Data
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10: B 5 ;1
Sample DatefTime: Monday, September 08, 2014 14:42:26
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.1987
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\B 5 ;1 .2026
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD
I u 238 5557 3.299 2097.909 4.222
L> In 115 696466 0.397 840252.334 0.353
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean
I u 238 o.oo4
L> In 115 896486.263
Cone. Mean
1.489
Su..-~pU...v.Jt. ~. \,00~~ ~
Page 1
Sample ID: B 5 ; 1
Report Datemme: Monday, September 08, 2014 14:43:05
Cone. SO
0.11
Cone. RSD
7.5
l O 'O -
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10: D 5 ;1
Sample DaterTime: Monday, September OS, 2014 15:03:18
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.1987
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\D 5 ;1 .2034
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C: \Eiandata_ US ER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 141668 1.715 2097.909 4.222
L> In 115 966206 2.257 840252.334 0.353
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.144
L> In 115 966206.055
Cone. Mean
77.390
s~~\..cL ~....Wt. ~ \-~OC:O ~
Page 1
\\~,q_ ~
'.COOYJ(
Sample ID: D 5 ;1
Report DaterTime: Monday, September 08, 2014 15:03:57
Cone. SO
0.77
Cone. RSD
1.0
\.~Q -\
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample ID: D 11;2
Sample DatefTime: Monday, September 08,201415:11 :06
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.1987
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Methodluranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\D 11 ;2.2037
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD
I u 238 67701 0.366 2097.909 4.222
L> In 115 947445 0.573 840252.334 0.353
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean
I u 238 o.o69
L> In 115 947445.497
Cone. Mean
36.758
s~C)\."'~\..L u.J +...' \. ocs ~
Page 1
Sample ID: D 11 ;2
Report Date/Time: Monday, September 08, 2014 15:11:45
Cone. SD
0.23
-
Cone. RSD
0.6
\.,00 -\
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample ID: E-2
Sample Daterrime: Monday, September 15, 2014 11 :18:04
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2344
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\E-2.2355
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 6734 4.734 1683.601 7.656
L> In 115 800645 4.202 791120.025 5.255
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.ooa
L> In 115 800645.493
Cone. Mean
2.256
Cone. SO
0.02
Cone. RSD
0.9
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
-;)_. ~ s {., \.A~ ~-'f ~F.) -d--;;) .5 ~ ~;} -Y-
~~ j -~ _...
\Z% \<-~
Page 1
Sample 10: E-2
Report Daterrime: Monday, September 15,201411:18:43
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10: E 15 ;1
Sample Date!Time: Monday, September 08, 2014 14:32:04
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.1987
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\E 15 ;1.2022
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 10482 0.465 2097.909 4.222
L> In 115 895878 0.128 840252.334 0.353
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.oo9
L> In 115 895878.459
Cone. Mean
4.462
~\.Q_ w-t. ~ I.Or773 ~
~ .oo13x
Page 1
Sample 10: E 15 :1
Report DatefTime: Monday, September 08, 2014 14:32:43
Cone. SD
0.02
Cone. RSD
0.5
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L v ·, \..v-A , .. «"j '(\. :~ __ o_
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10: F 10 ;1
Sample DatefTime: Monday, September 06, 2014 14:47:38
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.19B7
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\F 10 ; 1.2028
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 11079 1.887 2097.909 4.222
L> In 115 902901 0.581 840252.334 0.353
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.o1o
L> In 115 902901.158
Page 1
Sample ID: F 10 ;1
Cone. Mean
4.771
Report DatefTime: Monday, September 08, 2014 14:48:18
Cone. SO
0.14
Cone. RSD
2.9
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
-~-----
_..
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample ID: F 13 ;2
Sample DatefTime: Monday, September 06, 2014 14:24:16
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.1967
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\F 13 ;2.2019
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 236 6845 4.441 2097.909 4.222
L> In 115 912016 0.081 840252.334
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean Cone. Mean Cone. SO r u 238 0.005 2.195 0.18
L> In 115 912015.692
~\QIJ.)t! \uOO~I ~ -o·, \....,..-·~n·oV\
------· ) -c:,.. )( 0.( '-(
Page 1
Sample ID: F 13 ;2
Report Date/Time: Monday, September 08, 2014 14:24:57
~\
\ J
Cone. RSD
8.4
LC>v -
0.353
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample ID: G-11
Sample Datemme: Monday, September 15,201411:15:29
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709181ank.2344
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\G-11.2354
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 17386 6.978 1683.601 7.656
L> In 115 824921 6.411 791120.025 5.255
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.o19
L> In 115 824920.889
Cone. Mean
7.568
Cone. SO
0.05
s~~~vJ~: ~ ~.DDOl}
Cone. RSD
0.7
f s;~~x o.~~~ {!!-) ~
Page 1
\5~~~~
d·?)t)b\x
Sample ID; G-11
Report Daterrime: Monday, September 15, 2014 11:16:08
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10: H 14 ;1
Sample DatefTime: Monday, September DB, 2014 13:40:59
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.1967
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\H 14 ;1.2011
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 13340 2.056 2097.909 4.222
L> In 115 855568 0.799 840252.334 0.353
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean Cone. Mean Cone. SO Cone. RSD Sample Unit r u 238 0.013 6.567 0.24 3.7 ug/L
L> In 115 855567.540 ugll
5~\Q_ ~: \.00~0;} ~ ·, k,,_ + ~~"'\ : 02Q_
I
Page 1
Sample ID: H 14 ;1
Report Daterrime: Monday, September 08, 2014 13:41 :38
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10: H 16 ;1
Sample DatefTime: Monday, September 08,2014 13:20:06
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.1987
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\H 16 ; 1.2003
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD
I u 238 5163 2.138 2097.909 4.222
L> In 115 878030 1.571 840252.334 0.353
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean
I u 238 o.oo3
L> In 115 878030.066
\ ~.\1 ~
Page 1
Sample ID: H 16 ; 1
Cone. Mean
1.317
Report Daterrime: Monday, September 08, 2014 13:20:46
Cone. SD
0.03
Cone. RSD
2.4
l \!10 -)
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10: I 6 ;2
Sample DatefTime: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 08:59:43
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2043
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\1 6 ;2.2052
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 236 30689 2.129 4415.076 7.784
L> In 115 864431 0.341 868217.638 0.621
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 236 o.o31
L> In 115 864430.572
Cone. Mean
9.950
~~fJ~w~ ~ \-DD~1.\
Page 1
Sample ID: I 6 ;2
Report Date/Time: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 09:00:23
Cone. SO
0.25
Cone. RSD
2.5
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis-Summary Report
Sample 10: 1-7
Sample DatefTime: Monday, September 15, 2014 11:10:18
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2344
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\1-7.2352
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD
i u 238 19889 1.709 1683.601 7.656
L> In 115 804160 1.482 791120.025 5.255
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean
i u 238 0.023
L> In 115 804160.095
Page 1
Sample ID: 1-7
Cone. Mean
9.104
Report DatefTime: Monday, September 15,201411:10:57
Cone. SO
0.04
Cone. RSD
0.4
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample ID: M 8 ;2
Sample Date/Time: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 09:15:17
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2043
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\M 8 ;2.2058
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 23445 2.407 4415.076 7.784
L> In 115 889592 2.826 868217.638 0.621
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean Cone. Mean Cone. SO Cone. RSD Sample Unit r u 238 0.021 6.589 0.04 0.7 ugfL
L> In 115 889592.105 ug/L
s~~\...u_ '-.,___,)~ ~ \.DODd-if \) ~ \..._ \..>-~' '() v'\ e lOt} 1)
lof5~ %'~ ~ \ ____.,.....,._--
I ~DODd-¥
.-... ·--·-------
Page 1
Sample ID: M 8 ;2
Report Date/Time: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 09:15:56
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10: 0 8 ;1
Sample DatefTime: Monday, September 08, 2014 13:51 :22
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.1987
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\0 8 ; 1.2015
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_ U SER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 7173 1.290 2097.909 4.222
L> In 115 858541 0.253 840252.334 0.353
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean Cone. Mean Cone. SD Cone. RSD Sample Unit
r u 238 0.006 2.654 0.05 1.9 ug/L
L> In 115 858540.630 ug/L
2>a..~?\..cL 0t-: 1~00dlf ~ w ; \v-.1._ \ e> "'-'-'q ~ 0-
!
I 0 . I)L ) / t~) ~
J
LoU<>~
Page 1
Sample ID: 0 8 ;1
Report DatefTime: Monday, September 08, 2014 13:52:02
Quantitative Analysis-Summary Report
Sample JD: Q-12
Sample DatefTime: Monday, September 15, 2014 11:12:54
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2344
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Q-12.2353
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 23361 4.028 1683.601 7.656
L> In 115 831116 3.463 791120.025 5.255
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean Cone. Mean Cone. SD Cone. RSD Sample Unit
r u 238 0.026 10.520 0.12 1.2 ug/L
L> In 115 831116.356 ug/L
s 0-V-.A-? \.Q. wt ==-<J.oocJs-b 'l 'v.-.-\ i CV"'\ \DO -\
--
Page 1
Sample ID: Q-12
Report Date/Time: Monday, September 15, 2014 11:13:33
Quantitative Analysis ·Summary Report
Sample 10: R 9 ;1
Sample DatefTime: Monday, September 08, 2014 13:09:44
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\ 140709\Biank.1987
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\ 140709\R 9 ; 1.1999
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 8208 214.204 2097.909 4.222
L> In 115 875191 0.893 840252.334 0.353
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean Cone. Mean Cone. SD Cone. RSD Sample Unit r u 238 0.007 3.151 10.87 344.9 ug/L
L> In 115 875191 .202 ug/L
St~--"""?\4 W" ~ \~DOD~ l) ~ \~J..~\0¥\ ~ tOO ~ '
I
(
3\.SI~)
\ .oaotDr
Page 1
Sample ID: R 9 ; 1
Report Date/Time: Monday, September 08, 2014 13:10:24
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10: S 13 ;2
Sample DatefTime: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 09:10:05
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2043
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\S 13 ;2.2056
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 17935 3.768 4415.076 7.784
L> In 115 874846 0.700 868217.638 0.621
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.o1s
L> In 115 874845.822
Cone. Mean
4.489
s~?~ uJ~c~ \.Oo~\~
Cone. SO
0.23
(L\.; u~ )f{).\y_ )( t~o1o~ -
Page 1
Sample ID: S 13 ;2
Report DatefTime: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 09:10:44
Cone. RSD
5.0
-......
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
\CO -\
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10: T 8 ;2
Sample DatefTime: Monday, September 08, 2014 13:07:09
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.1987
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\T 8 ;2.1998
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 13798 1.636 2097.909 4.222
L> In 115 872084 0.252 840252.334 0.353
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.o13
L> In 115 872083.948
~~~ ~: l.DOO\Q
Page 1
Sample ID: T B ;2
Cone. Mean
6.690
Report Daterrime: Monday, September 08, 2014 13:07:46
Cone. SO
0.13
Cone. RSD
1.9
(c·O -\
Sample Unit
ug/L
ugiL
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10: T 10 ;1
Sample Daternme: Monday, September 08, 2014 13:30:33
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.1987
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\T 10 ;1.2007
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 6151 1.979 2097.909 4.222
L> In 115 892037 0.469 840252.334 0.353
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.oo4
L> In 115 892037.360
Page 1
Sample ID: T 10 ;1
Cone. Mean
1.866
Report DatefTime: Monday, September OS, 201413:31 :13
Cone. SO
0.08
Cone. RSD
4.5
c. ,., --
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10: V"J-;2
Sample DatefTim~uesday, September 09, 2014 09:04:54
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2043
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\V 6 ;2.2054
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 8200 2.071 4415.076 7.784
L> In 115 844106 0.649 868217.638 0.621
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.oo5
L> In 115 844105.883
Cone. Mean
0.624
Cone. SO
0.07
(o.\D~W.~ )(o-\ Y: ) ~"j ~ ~ -
Cone. RSD
11 .8
,~)(~;&
Page 1
Sample 10: V 6 ;2
Report Date/Time: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 09:05:33
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample ID: X 8 ;1
Sample Daterrime: Monday, September 08, 2014 13:25:19
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\ 140709\Biank.1987
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\X 8 ;1 .2005
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 5054 5.591 2097.909 4.222
L> In 115 867729 3.420 840252.334 0.353
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean Cone. Mean Cone. SD Cone. RSD Sample Unit
r u 238 0.003 1.285 0.08 6.5 ug/L
L> In 115 867729.243 ug/L
"Sc..~~\e_ Wt-: 1.00\~~ 0 l ~v..--\ ,fJv\ :.. l_qQ._
'
L
Page 1
Sample ID: X 8 ;1
Report Date/Time: Monday, September DB , 2014 13:25:59
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10: BLANK
Sample DaterTime: Monday, September 08,2014 13:14:55
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.1987
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\ 140709\BLANK.2001
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 1967 6.133 2097.909 4.222
L> In 115 847379 0.286 840252.334 0.353
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 -o.ooo
L> In 115 847378.606
Page 1
Sample ID: BLANK
Cone. Mean
-0.061
Report Dateffime: Monday, September 08, 2014 13:15:34
Cone. SD
0.01
Cone. RSD
13.1
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10:2
Sample Date!Time: Monday, September 08, 2014 13:17:30
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\ 140709\Biank.1987
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\2.2002
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 34835 1.479 2097.909 4.222
L> In 115 890020 1.389 840252.334 0.353
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.o37
L> In 115 890020.363
Page 1
Sample ID: 2
Cone. Mean
1.929
Report DatefTime: Monday, September 08, 2014 13:18:10
Cone. SD
0.00
Cone. RSD
0.1
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis-Summary Report
Sample 10:3
Sample Date/Time: Monday, September 08, 2014 13:35:48
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.1987
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\3.2009
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 50870 1.219 2097.909 4.222
L> In 115 826093 0.585 840252.334 0.353
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.o5s
L> In 115 826093.168
Page 1
Sample ID: 3
Cone. Mean
3.142
Report Date/Time: Monday, September 08, 2014 13:36:28
Cone. SD
0.05
Cone. RSD
1.5
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10:0
Sample DatefTime: Monday, September 08, 2014 13:38:23
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\ 140709\Biank.1987
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\0.201 0
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optlmize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 2453 5.454 2097.909 4.222
L> In 115 830843 0.978 840252.334 0.353
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.ooo
L> In 115 830843.497
Page 1
Sample ID: 0
Cone. Mean
-0.027
Report Date/Time: Monday, September 08, 2014 13:39:02
Cone. SD
0.01
Cone. RSD
28.5
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10:1
Sample DatefTime: Monday, September 08, 2014 13:56:34
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.1987
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\1 .2017
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 16859 1.011 2097.909 4.222
L> In 115 626654 0.313 640252.334 0.353
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.o18
L> In 115 826653.972
Page 1
Sample ID: 1
Cone. Mean
0.916
Report Date/Time: Monday, September 08,201413:57:13
Cone. SD
0.01
Cone. RSD
0.8
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis-Summary Report
Sample ID: BLANK
Sample DaterTime: Monday, September 08, 2014 14:37:14
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.1987
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\BLANK.2024
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 2562 1.517 2097.909 4.222
L> In 115 828568 0.252 840252.334 0.353
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.oo1
L> In 115 828567.834
Page 1
Sample ID: BLANK
Cone. Mean
-0.019
Report DaterTime: Monday, September 08, 2014 14:37:53
Cone. SD
0.00
Cone. RSD
15.5
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10: 2
Sample DatefTime: Monday, September 06, 2014 14:39:50
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Blank.1987
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\2.2025
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 33111 1.262 2097.909 4.222
L> In 115 847932 0.030 840252.334 0.353
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.o37
L> In 115 847932.226
Page 1
Sample ID: 2
Cone. Mean
1.924
Report Date/Time: Monday, September 08, 2014 14:40:29
Cone. SO
0.03
Cone. RSD
1.4
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample ID: 3
Sample DaterTime: Monday, September 08, 2014 14:58:07
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.1987
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\3.2032
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 50809 1.054 2097.909 4.222
L> In 115 849851 0.610 840252.334 0.353
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.o57
L> In 115 849851 .222
Page 1
Sample 10: 3
Cone. Mean
3.045
Report Daterrime: Monday, September 08, 2014 14:58:47
Cone. So
0.04
Cone. RSD
1.5
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample ID: 0
Sample DatefTime: Monday, September 08, 2014 15:00:43
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.1987
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\0.2033
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 2839 2.870 2097.909 4.222
L> In 115 849755 0.437 840252.334 0.353
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.oo1
L> In 115 849754.597
Page 1
Sample ID: 0
Cone. Mean
-0.006
Report DatefTime: Monday, September OS, 201415:01 :22
Cone. SD
0.01
Cone. RSD
94.5
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample ID: 1
Sample Date!Time: Monday, September 08, 2014 15:13:41
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USERIDataSet\140709\Biank.1987
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Methodluranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\1.2038
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 17026 1.207 2097.909 4.222
L> In 115 851607 0.254 840252.334 0.353
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.o11
L> In 115 851607.340
Page 1
Sample ID: 1
Cone. Mean
0.894
Report Date/Time: Monday, September 08, 2014 15:14:20
Cone. SD
0.01
Cone. RSD
1.5
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
-=---~
..
.. .....
I
• .,
.. .. r • • • .,
I I .. .. .. ' .. •-.. I . . • • ., .,
•
A._ • r p ._ • I . • .;-. -~-· ..... ,._ .·..... . ::.";·~~ ... ~ r-• .... r. '· I !. . ,. • .. • .I U • .&. . , • .
· ·.. • ifi.__ • :r. .J • .,. , ••• : • '-• 11 • • ...::-.. -.P....l .,. ~r..,·.-.. · • '!"'· •..-..f .. ll I I T 'i . . ... Ill.. .. • • •• ..
• ..
•"' ••
•• 5-f
I II • .• r .... ~
• I • .. "
..
• .-•
•
'
Quantitative Analysis-Summary Report
Sample 10: B 5 1
Sample DatefTime: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:07:32
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2551
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\8 5 1.2580
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 6157 1.462 1544.020 2.874
L> In 115 627144 0.349 605322.287 0.144
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.oo7
L> In 115 627144.123
Page 1
Sample ID: B 5 1
Cone. Mean
2.029
Report Datemme: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:08:11
Cone. SD
0.04
Cone. RSD
2.1
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
lO"' -~
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample ID: D 5 1
Sample Date/Time: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:41:23
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2551
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\D 5 1 .2593
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD
i u 238 4119 4.763 1544.020 2.874
L> In 115 588578 5.153 605322.287 0.144
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean
i u 238 0.004
L> In 115 588578.456
Concentration Results
Cone. Mean
1.027
Cone. SD
0.01
Cone. RSD
1.2
·~\"Y'""\t-'>UL-~-: 2.. . c:x::c:>t:;,"
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
/t -ozt ~ 0 . ti2J(-lt>=~-: l-o.-:2...:/~ ~\Y ~ ~~ I -____)
/' ,....__ ~l:::~(90~~~
Page 1
Sample ID: D 5 1
Report Date/Time: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:42:03
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample ID: D 111
Sample DatefTime: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11 :12:43
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2551
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\D 11 1.2582
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 5335 1.201 1544.020 2.874
L> In 115 599643 3.095 605322.287 0.144
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.oo6
L> In 115 599642.530
Cone. Mean
1.703
s~ f' \...Q_ '-.lX ~ ~ .ooos ?-
Page 1
Sample 10: D 11 1
Report DatefTime: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:13:23
Cone. SO
0.06
Cone. RSD
3.7
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
1..00 -\
Quantitative Analysis ·Summary Report
Sample 10: E 15 1
Sample DatefTime: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11 :04:57
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSei\140709\Biank.2551
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\E 15 1.2579
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 47655 1.311 1544.020 2.874
L> In 115 622959 0.482 605322.287 0.144
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 23s o.o74
L> In 115 622959.026
Cone. Mean
25.739
Cone. SD
0.25
d.. DO( '0 "r £;>·, \L4--\ \~ "
~~j @ ·\L~ (:,-);
Page 1
Sample ID: E 15 1
Report DatefTime: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11 :05:36
Cone. RSD
1.0
lO'O -
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10: F 10 1
Sample DatefTime: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11 :15:19
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2551
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\F 10 1.2583
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Defautt.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSO r u 23a 6920 0.460 1544.020 2.874
L> In 115 619935 0.315 605322.287 0.144
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.oo9
L> In 115 619935.469
Sc..--0 \...Q_ wt f,
Page 1
Sample 10: F 10 1
Cone. Mean
2.508
~--OOt l ~-
Cone. SO
0.03
/\~'0 ~
.' \
\.
Report Daterrime: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:15:58
Cone. RSD
1.2
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
(OD -\
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10: F 13 1
Sample DatefTime: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 10:59:46
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2551
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\F 13 1.2577
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 9373 0.598 1544.020 2.874
L> In 115 627281
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.o12
L> In 115 627280.589
0.430 605322.287
Concentration Results
Cone. Mean
3.851
Cone. SD
0.01
Cone. RSD
0.3
Sc.---oU... \.0-t ~ :l .oor5 '1-\:.\\ \v-.\ 1 0'('1
~·~~~~ Je·'~ ~) ~ 3~£\ ~
Page 1
Sample ID: F 13 1
Report Date!Time: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:00:25
0.144
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10: G 111
Sample Date/Time: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:20:32
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2551
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\G 11 1.2585
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 19821 5.788 1544.020 2.874
L> In 115 591934 6.182 605322.287 0.144
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.o31
L> In 115 591934.078
Page 1
Sample ID: G 11 1
Cone. Mean
10.447
Report Date/Time: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11 :21:11
Cone. SD
0.09
Cone. RSD
0.9
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10: H 141
Sample DatefTime: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 10:57:11
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\ 140709\Biank.2551
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\H 14 1.2576
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 5540 0.453 1544.020 2.874
L> In 115 615160 0.449 605322.287 0.144
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.oo6
L> In 115 615160.316
Cone. Mean
1.741
Cone. SD
0.01
~\e_ u.Jt: ~ :;2.000-=f 9J
(·'~ ~~j &r)f,) -
Page 1
Sample ID: H 14 1
Report Date/Time: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 10:57:50
Cone. RSD
0.6
-
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
\00 -'
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample ID: 16 1
Sample Daterrime: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 10:24:05
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2551
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709116 1.2572
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 8926 7.453 1544.020 2.874
L> In 115 604782 6.693 605322.287 0.144
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean
I u 238 0.012
L> In 115 604781.895
Cone. Mean
3.785
~?k w'b ~ ,:).OO'O'f
Cone. SD
0.06
Cone. RSD
1.6
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
(J.!i)o -' (~.1~4r~~·~ c.~ ~~)o: ~·~suca _ _.... __ \
Page 1
Sample 10: 16 1
Report Daterrime: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 10:24:44
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample ID: I 7 1
Sample DatefTime: Tuesday, September 23,2014 11:36:12
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2551
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\1 7 1.2591
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD
I u 238 14678 0.764 1544.020 2.874
L> In 115 610290 0.380 605322.287 0.144
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean
I u 238 o.o22
L> In 115 610290.213
Cone. Mean
7.090
Cone. SO
0.05
~~ v:J\ -~ z. oo3~
Cone. RSD
0.7
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
I·~;U8~x-L~=) =: -[0 .0]0 ~
Page 1
Sample ID: I 7 1
Report DatefTime: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:36:51
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10: M 8 1
Sample DatefTime: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:02:21
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2551
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Methodluranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\M 8 1.2578
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 5568 1.535 1544.020 2.874
L> In 115 625985 0.633 605322.287 0.144
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean Cone. Mean Cone. SD Cone. RSD Sample Unit r u 238 0.006 1.701 0.05 2.7 ug/L
L> In 115 625984 .614 ug/L
s~~\..Q_ -wl ~ ~,OO~l cr ~: \"'-h'o"\(1. t ~~ .
\
-
Page 1
Sample ID: M 8 1
Report DatefTime: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:03:00
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10: 08 2
Sample Date/Time: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 10:26:40
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2551
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns}: 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\08 2.2573
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas . lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSO
I u 238 5721 4.967 1544.020 2.874
L> In 115 598522 6.815 605322.287 0.144
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean
I u 238 o.oo7
L> In 115 598522.350
Cone. Mean
1.940
s~~\..a. w-e.~ c?. DD~ct
Page 1
Sample ID: 08 2
Report Date/Time: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 10:27:19
Cone. SO
0.07
Cone. RSO
3.4
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
lOO -\
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10: Q 12 1
Sample Date/Time: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11 :23:08
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2551
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File : C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Q 12 1.2586
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 4337 3.811 1544.020 2.874
L> In 115 586668 5.157 605322.287 0.144
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.oo5
L> In 115 586668.266
Cone. Mean
1.168
Cone. SD
0.04
~(\fl..< wr-= 2.. . od-\. 2-(-1-l ~~~=j(~('~
Page 1
Sample ID: Q 12 1
Report Dale/Time: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11 :23:48
Cone. RSD
3.2
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
--
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10: R 9 1
Sample DatefTime: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:38:48
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_ USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2551
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\R 9 1.2592
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 6716 0.435 1544.020 2.874
L> In 115 619031 0.220 605322.287 0.144
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.ooa
L> In 115 619031.033
Cone. Mean
2.396
Cone. SD
0.02
~~ 1--\JT • • .z..O.o2__~
Cone. RSD
0.9
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
t ·~~~~tQ·l \\-?J Ll~)-2-~-~(o~
Page 1
'2--3JDtLQ~
?-~~
Sample ID: R 9 1
Report DatefTime: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:39:27
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample ID: s13 1
Sample DatefTime: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 10:31 :51
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2551
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\s13 1.2575
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File :
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD
i u 238 8582 0.894 1544.020 2.874
L> In 115 618949 0.560 605322.287 0.144
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean
i u 238 0.011
L> In 115 618949.098
Cone. Mean
3.469
S~le LDt ~ ~.DODlo 'i-
Cone. SD
0.02
f=·~q ~~)t ·~L)~
Page 1
Sample 10: s13 1
Report Date/Time: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 10:32:30
--
Cone. RSD
0.5
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
l.O" ___.
\
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10: T81
Sample Date!Time: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 10:29:16
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2551
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Methodluranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\TS 1.2574
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD
I u 238 3675 3.693 1544.020 2.874
L> In 115 615542 0.644 605322.287 0.144
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean Cone. Mean Cone. SD Cone. RSD Sample Unit
I u 238 0.003 0.661 0.07 9.8 ug/L
L> In 115 615542.209 ug/L
s~p\..L w-e 6 ~~ooas ~ ~ U .I \u.\ \01'\~ \0'0 :.--\.
Page 1
Sample ID: TB 1
Report Date!Time: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 10:29:55
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10: T 10 1
Sample Daterrime: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11 :43:59
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiand ata_ US ER\DataSet\ 140709\Biank. 2551
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\T 10 1.2594
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 4952 1.091 1544.020 2.874
L> In 115 604082 0.518 605322.287 0.144
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.oo6
L> In 115 604081 .884
Page 1
Sample ID: T 10 1
Cone. Mean
1.454
Report Date/Time: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11 :44:39
Cone. SD
0.04
Cone. RSD
2.8
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample ID: 3
Sample Date/Time: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11 :28:23
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2551
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\3.2588
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD
I u 238 49815 1.o18 1544.020 2.874
L> In 115 612749 0.722 605322.287 0.144
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean
I u 238 o.o79
L> In 115 612748.869
Page 1
Sample ID: 3
Cone. Mean
2.745
Report Date/Time: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:29:03
Cone. SO
0.01
Cone. RSD
0.4
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample ID: BLANK
Sample DatefTime: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:30:59
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2551
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\BLANK.2589
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 3039 2.101 1544.020 2.874
l> In 115 613987 0.324 605322.287 0.144
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.oo2
l> In 115 613987.251
Page 1
Sample ID: BLANK
Cone. Mean
0.030
Report Date/Time: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:31:37
Cone. SD
0.00
Cone. RSD
11.3
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10: 2
Sample DatefTime: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11 :10:08
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2551
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_ USER\DataSet\140709\2.2581
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 32910 5.332 1544.020 2.874
L> In 115 614624 5.211 605322.287 0.144
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.o51
L> In 115 614624.462
Page 1
Sample ID: 2
Cone. Mean
1.758
Report DatefTime: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:10:47
Cone. SD
0.01
Cone. RSD
0.6
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10:2
Sample DatefTime: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:46:35
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\ 140709\Biank.2551
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\2.2595
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 23a 32721 0.781 1544.020 2.874
L> In 115 619968 0.216 605322.287 0.144
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.o5o
L> In 115 619968.475
Page 1
Sample ID: 2
Cone. Mean
1.731
Report DatefTime: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11 :47:15
Cone. SD
0.02
Cone. RSD
1.0
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample ID: BLANK
Sample Dateffime: Tuesday, September23, 201411:49:11
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2551
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\BLANK.2596
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 2915 2.348 1544.020 2.874
L> In 115 604508 0.715 605322.287 0.144
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.oo2
L> In 115 604507.508
Page 1
Sample ID: BLANK
Cone. Mean
0.025
Report Dateffime: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:49:49
Cone. SD
0.00
Cone. RSD
13.0
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample ID: E15
Sample Datemme: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 14:07:10
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2706
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\E15 .2714
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 4590 6.979 1266.977 1.934
L> In 115 895468 7.813 795718.565 0.663
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean Cone. Mean Cone. SO Cone. RSD Sample Unit
r u 238 0.004 1.458 0.06 4.0 ug/L
L> In 115 895468.417 ug/L
&~~l-4.. vJ+: ? .ooo'-f Cr D\\v.:\~ lOO
\
--
Page 1
Sample ID: E15
Report DatefTime: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 14:07:49
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample ID: F13
Sample DatefTime: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 14:12:20
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSeti140709\Biank.2706
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Methodluranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\F13.2716
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD
I u 238 2257 0.911 1266.977 1.934
L> In 115 937209 1.588 795718.565 0.663
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean
I u 238 o.oo1
L> In 115 937208.965
Page 1
Sample ID: F13
Cone. Mean
-0.160
Report DatefTime: Tuesday, September30, 201414:13:00
Cone. SD
0.02
Cone. RSD
13.2
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample ID: G11;1
Sample Daterrime: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 11:59:17
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_ USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2656
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\G11 ;1.2686
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 2400 2.313 1261.310 5.340
L> In 115 804283 0.307 702905.487 7.280
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean Cone. Mean Cone. SD Cone. RSD Sample Unit r u 238 0.001 0.056 0.04 63.2 ug/L
L> In 115 804283.022 ug/L
5a..-.pU!.. w b ~ !J.OOllf l>; \ ~+\'0""-~
1
Page 1
Sample ID: G11;1
Report Date/Time: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 11:59:56
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10: 16;1
Sample DatefTime: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 11:15:01
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\ 140709\Biank.2656
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\16;1.2674
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 4521 1.355 1261.310 5.340
L> In 115 735228 0.052 702905.487 7.280
Concentration Results
Anafyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.oo4
L> In 115 735227.819
Cone. Mean
1.509
Cone. SO
0.04
~~~\..L u.Jt ~ ';l,QQ \0 ~
QcS~Q~ )~·~t ~) =
Page 1
Sample ID: 16;1
Report Date/Time: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 11:15:41
Cone. RSD
2.6
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
"D'~ \v.. ~ "QV'\ '!lQ. ~
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10: 17;2
Sample DaterTime: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 12:25:15
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2656
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Methodluranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\OataSet\140709\17;2.2690
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Oefault.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: Elcternal Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD
I u 238 5823 6.503 1261.310 5.340
L> In 115 712743 6.647 702905.487 7.280
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean
I u 238 o.ooe
L> In 115 712743.204
Cone. Mean
2.436
Cone. SD
0.01
Se-..-plL u)k": ;>,oo \"l <a
Page 1
Sample ID: 17;2
Report DaterTime: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 12:25:55
Cone. RSD
0.5
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
'!)~ ~~\'e-1\. '130
\
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample ID: S13;1
Sample DatefTime: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 11 :30:40
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\ 140709\Biank.2656
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\513; 1.2680
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD
I u 238 3252 7.331 1261.310 5.340
L> In 115 700072 7.075 702905.487 7.280
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean Cone. Mean Cone. SD Cone. RSD Sample Unit
I u 238 0.003 0.818 0.01 1.6 ug/L
L> In 115 700071.504 ug/L
Sa.-~kW-6: ~.cooct ':D\\~~~ \l)O ;.....-
Page 1
Sample ID: 513;1
Report DatefTime: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 11:31:20
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample ID: CB
Sample DatefTime: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 10:56:53
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2656
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\CB.2667
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD
I u 238 1326 5.601 1261.310 5.340
L> In 115 682873 6.946 702905.487 7.280
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean
I u 238 o.ooo
L> In 115 682873.114
Page 1
Sample ID: CB
Cone. Mean
-0.042
Report Date/Time: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 10:57:32
Cone. SD
0.00
Cone. RSD
3.2
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10: CV-2
Sample Dateffime: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 10:59:28
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\ 140709\Biank.2656
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\CV-2.2668
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Elandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analy1e Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 33551 6.359 1261.310 5.340
L> In 115 714833 7.565 702905.487 7.280
Concentration Results
Analy1e Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.o4s
L> In 115 714833.131
Page 1
Sample ID: CV-2
Cone. Mean
2.024
Report DatefTime: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 11 :00:08
Cone. SD
0.03
Cone. RSD
1.4
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample ID: CB
Sample DatefTime: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 11 :09:49
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Data5et\140709\Biank.2656
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\CB.2672
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD
I u 238 1320 5.418 1261.310 5.340
L> In 115 692841 6.577 702905.487 7.280
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean
I u 238 o.ooo
L> In 115 692841 .398
Page 1
Sample ID: CB
Cone. Mean
-0.044
Report DatefTime: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 11:10:28
Cone. SD
0.00
Cone. RSD
3.7
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample ID: CV-3
Sample Date!Time: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 11:12:25
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2656
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_US ER\DataSet\140709\CV-3.2673
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD
I u 238 49428 5.700 1261.310 5.340
L> In 115 709648 6.590 702905.487 7.280
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean
I u 238 o.o68
L> In 115 709648.248
Page 1
Sample ID: CV-3
Cone. Mean
3.066
Report Date/Time: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 11:13:05
Cone. SD
0.03
Cone. RSD
1 '1
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10: Blank
Sample DatefTime: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 13:30:13
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Blank
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2706
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2706
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD
I u 238 1267 1.934
L> In 115 795719 0.663
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean Cone. Mean Cone. SD Cone. RSD
I u 238
L> In 115
Page 1
Sample ID: Blank
Report DatefTime: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 13:30:52
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis-Summary Report
Sample ID: 0
Sample Dateffime: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 13:33:03
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Standard
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2706
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Methodluranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\0.2707
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 1216 5.351 1266.977 1.934
L> In 115 773199 7.353 795718.565 0.663
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 -o.ooo
L> In 115 773198.844
Page 1
Sample ID: 0
Cone. Mean
Report Dateffime: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 13:33:42
Cone. so Cone. RSD Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample ID: 1
Sample DatefTime: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 13:35:53
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Standard
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2706
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\1.2706
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD
I u 238 15223 0.528 1266.977 1.934
L> In 115 828777 0.277 795718.565 0.663
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean
I u 238 o.o17
L> In 115 828777.325
Page 1
Sample ID: 1
Cone. Mean
1.000
Report DatefTime: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 13:36:32
Cone. SD
0.01
Cone. RSD
0.8
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample ID: 2
Sample DatefTime: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 13:38:43
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Standard
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2706
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\2.2709
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD
I u 238 31561 0.559 1266.977 1.934
L> In 115 854938 0.596 795718.565 0.663
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean
I u 238 o.o3s
L> In 115 854938.397
Page 1
Sample ID: 2
Cone. Mean
2.017
Report DatefTime: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 13:39:23
Cone. SD
0.01
Cone. RSD
0.6
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample ID: 3
Sample DatefTime: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 13:41:35
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Standard
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2706
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\3.271 0
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD
I u 238 45814 0.651 1266.977 1.934
L> In 115 834681 0.553 795718.565 0.663
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean
I u 238 o.o53
L> In 115 834680.736
Page 1
Sample ID: 3
Cone. Mean
3.010
Report DatefTime: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 13:42:15
Cone. SD
0.00
Cone. RSD
0.1
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample ID: 5
Sample DaterTime: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 13:44:27
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Standard
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2706
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\5.2711
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 23a 68451 6.707 1266.977 1.934
L> In 115 783538 7.916 795718.565 0.663
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.o8s
L> In 115 783538.182
Page 1
Sample ID: 5
Cone. Mean
4.953
Report DaterTime: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 13:45:07
Cone. SD
0.06
Cone. RSD
1.3
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample JD: 10
Sample Dateffime: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 13:47:18
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Standard
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.2706
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\1 0.2712
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 131447 7.643 1266.977 1 .934
L> In 115 774336 8.404 795718.565 0.663
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.168
L> In 115 774336.030
Page 1
Sample ID: 10
Cone. Mean
9.946
Report Date/Time: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 13:47:57
Cone. SO
0.10
Cone. RSD
1.0
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample ID: Blank
Sample DatefTime: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 13:50:07
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USERIDataSei\140709\Biank.2706
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandala_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSeti140709\Biank.2713
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD
I u 238 1269 1.454 1266.977 1.934
L> In 115 795904 0.343 795718.565 0.663
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.ooo
L> In 115 795904.148
Page 1
Sample ID: Blank
Cone. Mean
-0.064
Report DatefTime: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 13:50:46
Cone. SO
0.00
Cone. RSD
1.6
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample ID: B
Sample DaterTime: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 09:24:54
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.3596
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sampfe\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium fow.mth
Dataset Fife: C:\Efandata_USER\DataSet\140709\8.3617
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Defauft.tun
Optimization File: C:\Efandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD
I u 238 2478 3.904 1756.948 5.466
b In 115 613798 3.473 629926.007 3.905
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean
I u 238 o.oo1
L> In 115 613798.148
Page 1
Sample ID: B
Cone. Mean
0.237
Report DaterTime: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 09:25:33
Cone. SO
0.02
Cone. RSD
8.8
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample JD: F 10
Sample DatefTime: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 09:22:18
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.3596
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\F 10.3616
Tuning File: C:\Eiandala_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 5095 1.648 1756.948 5.466
L> In 115 628072 1.081 629926.007 3.905
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.oo5
L> In 115 628071.934
Cone. Mean
2.119
Cone. SD
0.04
Cone. RSD
2.0
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
~plrL Wt ; t~D!J I&'} b; \~\oV\-:. ~S!f
~·~~~~ ) ~·\).;) (!.o?-) ~ ~~.1'1 11er
Page 1
Sample ID: F 10
Report DatefTime: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 09:22:57
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10: 0 8 ,
Sample DatefTime: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 09:17:07
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\14D709\Biank,3596
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dua l
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\D30613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\0 8.3614
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD
I u 238 3099 3.030 1756.948 5.466
L> In 115 621390 2.357 629926.007 3.905
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean
I u 238 o.oo2
L> In 115 621389.712
/
Page 1
Sample ID: 0 8
Cone. Mean
0.676
Report Daterrime: Tuesday, November 18,2014 09:17:46
Cone. SD
0.03
Cone. RSD
4 .. 0
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
D ,-\ vvf i'o -Y\ " ... l.2-Q_
\
--
Quantitative Analysis-Summary Report
Sample 10: R 9
Sample Dateffime: Tuesday, November 18,2014 09:11:57
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_ USERIDataSeti140709\Biank.3596
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profi le Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode : Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\E/andata_USER\DataSet\140709\R 9.3612
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Defau/t.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD
I u 238 7655 2.135 1756.948 5.466
L> In 115 630014 1.870 629926.007 3.905
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.oo9
L> In 115 630014.043
Page 1
Sample ID: R 9
Cone. Mean
3.984
Report Dateffime: Tuesday, November 18,2014 09:12:36
Cone. SD
0.03
Cone. RSD
0.7
tOO -
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
'
•
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10: F 10
Sample Date/Time: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 14:34:56
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.3622
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\F 10 3633
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 3727 0.828 1868.525 3.386
L> In 115 667258 2.198 710257.245 1.682
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.oo3
L> In 115 667258.078
Cone. Mean
1.248
S~.pk LJ..)£~ /.DDd-ld-
Cone. SO
0.04
_\_.d-_~_~_-""\,..;.....cy_) tO·~ptj (_9~~ ~
Page 1
Sample ID: F 10
Report Date/Time: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 14:35:35
Cone. RSD
3.0
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample 10: R9
Sample DatefTime: Tuesday, November 25,2014 14:27:10
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\Biank.3622
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\R9.3630
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD
1 u 238 3413 1.820 1868.525 3.386
L> In 115 667577 1.416 710257.245
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean
I u 238 o.oo2
L> In 115 667577.309
Cone. Mean
1.018
I.OO~q}
Cone. SD
0.05
C l·o;;<t ~ (o·~k:)~~j _
Page 1
Sample ID: R9
Report Date/Time: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 14:27:49
Cone. RSD
4.4
1.682
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L
t_S?Q..
'
Quantitative Analysis -Summary Report
Sample ID: 2
Sample DatefTime: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 14:37:34
Sample Description:
Solution Type: Sample
Blank File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\BJank.3622
Number of Replicates: 3
Peak Processing Mode: Average
Signal Profile Processing Mode: Average
Dual Detector Mode: Dual
Dead Time (ns): 55
Sample File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Sample\030613.sam
Method File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Method\uranium low.mth
Dataset File: C:\Eiandata_USER\DataSet\140709\2.3634
Tuning File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Tuning\Default.tun
Optimization File: C:\Eiandata_USER\Optimize\Default.dac
Calibration File:
Calibration Type: External Calibration
Summary
Intensities
Analyte Mass Meas. lntens. Mean Meas. lntens. RSD Blank Intensity Blank lntens. RSD r u 238 29092 1.068 1868.525 3.386
L> In 115 699679 1.588 710257.245 1.682
Concentration Results
Analyte Mass Net lntens. Mean r u 238 o.o39
L> In 115 699679.239
Page 1
Sample ID: 2
Cone. Mean
1.872
Report DatefTime: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 14:38:13
Cone. SO
0.01
Cone. RSD
0.7
Sample Unit
ug/L
ug/L