DRC-2014-004484 - 0901a06880471e7c

DIVISION OF RADIATION CONTROL
Rusty Lundberg
Director
Department of
Environmental Quality
Amanda Smith
Executive Director
GARY R. HERBERT
Governor
GREG BELL
Lieutenant Governor
July 17,2014
Kathy Weinel DRC-2014-004484
Quality Assurance Manager
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Boulevard, Suite 600
Lakewood, CO 80228
Subject: Radioactive Material License No. UT 1900479
2014 Radiation Protection Inspection, Module RADMOD-ENVIRO-2014
Dear Ms. Weinel:
This letter refers to the inspection conducted at the Energy Fuels Resources (USA) facility in Blanding, UT
on June 26, 2014 by a representative of the Division of Radiation Control (DRC), Utah Department of
Environmental Quality.
The inspection was an examination of your facilities as they relate to compliance with the Utah Radiation
Control Rules and the conditions of the Radioactive Materials License Number UT 1900479. The
inspection consisted of personnel interviews, document reviews and direct observations by the inspector.
The activities and practices reviewed during the inspection with respect to Environmental Monitoring were
found to be in compliance with relevant requirements. However, it is recommended that the procedure for
calibrating environmental air sampling equipment be evaluated to ensure that the methodology is sound
and applicable to the equipment currently in use.
A copy ofthe Inspection Report is enclosed.
If you have any question, please contact Boyd Imai at [phone].
Sincerely,
Rusty Lundberg, Director
RL/BMI:bi
Enclosure
cc/enc: David Turk, Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Blanding, UT
195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144850 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4850
Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone] • T.D.D. [phone]
www.deq.utah.gov
Printed on 100% recycled paper
INSPECTION REPORT
Inspection Module: RADMOD-ENVIRO-2014: Environmental Monitoring
Radioactive Material License No. UT 1900479
Inspection Location: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Blanding, UT
Inspection Date(s): June 26, 2014
Inspector: Boyd Imai, Utah Division of Radiation Control (DRC)
Personnel Contacted: Dan Hillsten, Tanner Holliday, Garrin Palmer, David Turk, Kathy Weinel
Inspection Summary
The inspection was opened on June 26, 2014 with a meeting with D. Hillsten, and D. Turk.
Areas/Topics inspected included:
• Environmental Sampling Stations
• Meteorological Sampling Station and Data Collection
• Analytical Laboratory Certifications
• Air, Soil, Vegetation Reports
• Air Sample Collection Data and Equipment Calibrations
The inspector held a closeout meeting on June 26, 2014 with D. Hillsten, G. Palmer, and D. Turk of
Energy Fuels Resources to review the inspection activities, observations, and conclusions.
Findings
No citable violations or deficiencies were observed during the inspection.
Inspection Items
Environmental Sampling Stations
A visit to each of the environmental sampling stations BHV-1 through BHV-6 confirmed that the air
sampling pumps were operating and that the OSL (optically stimulated luminescence) dosimeters
and the alpha-track radon gas detectors (Radtrak) were in place. The Licensee observed that the
protective canister for the Radtrak detector at sample site BHV-3 needed service/repair/replacement;
the Licensee ensured that the detector was intact and undamaged and temporarily mended defective
canister. The Environmental Technician was then directed to remedy the damaged condition.
Two additional sampling stations are to be put into service in the near future. One ofthe two newly
acquired air sampling units was unpacked and the Environmental Technician demonstrated how the
calibrated orifice was attached to the unit which is used to calibrate the flow-rate ofthe pump.
Page 1 of 4
U:\MON_WAST\Bimai\wp\Inspections\Energy Fuel, Blanding, UT\2014\RADMOD-ENVIRO-
2014\InspectionReportRev0.doc
Meteorological Sampling Station and Data Collection
The meteorological station is checked weekly and the results documented on the White Mesa
Meteorological Station—Weekly Checks form. Wind speed and direction are measured and
recorded electronically. It was confirmed that the data is verified monthly by an independent party,
McVehil-Monnett Associates, who also calibrates the measuring equipment every six months. The
last calibration was performed in April 2014.
Atmospheric pressures and temperatures are measured and recorded by an Environmental
Technician.
Analytical Laboratory Certifications
Air and soil radioanalyses are performed by Energy Laboratories Incorporated - Casper and
vegetation samples are analyzed by GEL Laboratories, LLC. The Licensee had on file State of
Utah, Department of Health, Environmental Laboratory Certification Programs certificates for both
laboratories (expiration dates: 7/31/14 and 10/31/14, respectively).
Air, Soil, Vegetation Monitoring Reports
The data recorded are maintained in the Licensee's files. Information is compiled, evaluated,
summarized, and presented in the Semi-Annual Effluent Monitoring Report. The last report was
submitted to the Utah Division of Radiation Control on February 21, 2014.
Air Sample Collection Data and Equipment Calibrations
Air samples are collected weekly and submitted for analyses quarterly. Samples collected during
the quarter are submitted to the analytical laboratory accompanied by an air sampling data
spreadsheet. The total volume of air is calculated by multiplying the total time the sample was
being collected times the standard cubic feet per minute (scfm) which is then converted to liters.
It was found that the spreadsheet in use was not calculating the scfm as specified in the procedure
(Environmental Protection Manual, Section 1.1, Subsection 4.3). A value was assigned instead. It
could not be determined where the assigned values originated.
The Licensee revised the spreadsheet to include the calculations specified in the procedure and
demonstrated that there were no substantive differences in the calculated volumes. There is some
question regarding the origin of the formulae in the procedure and the values that are to be used for
the "a" and "b" "orifice constant" in calculating Qa (flow rate at field conditions). The MONTHLY
CALIBRATION WORKSHEET specifies values of 0.502178 for "a" and 0.495734 for "b" orifice
constants. The Licensee has two orifice standards, there should be two sets of orifice constants, one
set for each orifice. And it is speculated that the constants could change if the orifice characteristics
change as determined by the calibration of the orifice.
It was noted that the MONTHLY CALIBRATION WORKSHEET was being completed inconsistently
from week to week and upon further review the worksheet was not being completed properly in all
cases. The "Final Flow Rate" was not being recorded, instead pressure differential information was
reported.
Page 2 of 4
U:\MON_WAST\Bimai\wpMnspections\Energy Fuel, Blanding, UTA2014\RADMOD-ENVIRO-
2014\InspectionReportRev0.doc
The air sampling pumps are calibrated in the field by using a calibrated orifice. The differential
pressure is adjusted using a U-tube H2O manometer (adjusted to 4 inches of water) attached to the
orifice housing which translates to a flow rate of approximately 37 ftVmin (cfm). In order to obtain
a more precise flow rate, adjustments need to be made for the orifice characteristics and the changes
in temperature and pressure. The adjustments prescribed by procedure should be validated by the
Licensee.
Closeout Meeting
The inspector held a closeout meeting with D. Hillsten, G. Palmer and D. Turk of Energy Fuels
Resources (USA) on June 26, 2014. The observations made during the inspection were summarized
during the meeting.
Conclusion
The Licensee has an active environmental monitoring program. A full-time staff manages the
program. Air, soil, and vegetation samples are obtained at the prescribed frequencies. Samples are
analyzed by Utah certified laboratories. Monitoring data are recorded, charted, tracked and
evaluated to identify and assess radiological trends.
Regarding the air sampling practices, the processes are performed by rote and which have not been
assessed recently to determine if the outputs have been altered or corrupted due to intentional or
inadvertent changes, over time, to assumptions and intricate technical calculations.
The Orifice Equation and the Standard Conditions Flow Rate Equation found in subsections 4.1
and 4.2, respectively, of the Environmental Protection Manual need to be validated.
The MONTHLY CALIBRATION WORKSHEET is not being filled out consistently or completely.
The worksheet calls for a "final flow rate" which is not being calculated. The formulae presented
on the worksheet do not correspond with those found in the Environmental Protection Manual.
The Licensee revised the air sampling spreadsheet to address concerns expressed in the closeout
meeting including calculating the SCFM and locking the cells to prevent inadvertent changes.
Recommendations for the Licensee
• Validate all equations in the Environmental Protection Manual for determining the flow rate
of the air samplers
• Ascertain the source and the values of the orifice constants used in the flow rate at field
conditions (Qa) equation.
• Determine if a constant temperature (298° K) and pressure (760 mm Hg) should be used to
represent absolute temperature and atmospheric pressure at orifice calibration or if the
temperature and pressure reported at the time of orifice calibration should be used in the
calculation for flow rate at standard conditions (Qs).
• Revise the MONTHL Y CALIBRA TION WORKSHEET. Ensure the equations on the
worksheet are identical to the validated equations in the procedure.
Page 3 of 4
U:\MON_WAST\Bimai\wp\Inspections\Energy Fuel, Blanding, UT\2014\RADMOD-ENVIRO-
2014\1 nspectionReportRevO.doc
• If "Final Flow Rate" column is retained on the worksheet then a flow rate must be entered
and not the pressure differential.
• Train the staff in properly completing the worksheet.
Note: The inspector conferred with K. Weinel via telephone on July 8 and 11, 2014 who concurred
with the issues with the equations and indicated the concerns would be addressed.
Recommendation for the PRC Director
It is recommended that no enforcement action be taken at this time.
Prepared By: Boyd M. Imai July 15,2014
(Name) ' CJ (Signature) (Date)
Page 4 of 4
U:\MON_WAST\Bimai\wp\Inspections\Energy Fuel, Blanding, UT\2014\RADMOD-ENV1RO-
2014\InspectionReportRev0.doc
Inspection Report
ant
Inspection Checklist
RADMOD-EHUIfW-2014
INSPECTION REPORT
Inspection Module: RADMOD-ENVIRO-2014: Environmental Monitoring
Radioactive Material License No. UT 1900479
Inspection Location: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Blanding, UT
Inspection Date(s): June 26, 2014
Inspector: Boyd Imai, Utah Division of Radiation Control (DRC)
Personnel Contacted: Dan Hillsten, Tanner Holliday, Garrin Palmer, David Turk, Kathy Weinel
Inspection Summary
The inspection was opened on June 26, 2014 with a meeting with D. Hillsten, and D. Turk.
Areas/Topics inspected included:
• Environmental Sampling Stations
• Meteorological Sampling Station and Data Collection
• Analytical Laboratory Certifications
• Air, Soil, Vegetation Reports
• Air Sample Collection Data and Equipment Calibrations
The inspector held a closeout meeting on June 26, 2014 with D. Hillsten, G. Palmer, and D. Turk of
Energy Fuels Resources to review the inspection activities, observations, and conclusions.
Findings
No citable violations or deficiencies were observed during the inspection.
Inspection Items
Environmental Sampling Stations
A visit to each of the environmental sampling stations BHV-1 through BHV-6 confirmed that the air
sampling pumps were operating and that the OSL (optically stimulated luminescence) dosimeters
and the alpha-track radon gas detectors (Radtrak) were in place. The Licensee observed that the
protective canister for the Radtrak detector at sample site BHV-3 needed service/repair/replacement;
the Licensee ensured that the detector was intact and undamaged and temporarily mended defective
canister. The Environmental Technician was then directed to remedy the damaged condition.
Two additional sampling stations are to be put into service in the near future. One ofthe two newly
acquired air sampling units was unpacked and the Environmental Technician demonstrated how the
calibrated orifice was attached to the unit which is used to calibrate the flow-rate of the pump.
Page 1 of 4
U:\MON_WAST\Bimai\wp\Inspections\Energy Fuel, Blanding, UT\2014\RADMOD-ENVIRO-
20l4\InspectionReportRev0.doc
Meteorological Sampling Station and Data Collection
The meteorological station is checked weekly and the results documented on the White Mesa
Meteorological Station—Weekly Checks form. Wind speed and direction are measured and
recorded electronically. It was confirmed that the data is verified monthly by an independent party,
McVehil-Monnett Associates, who also calibrates the measuring equipment every six months. The
last calibration was performed in April 2014.
Atmospheric pressures and temperatures are measured and recorded by an Environmental
Technician.
Analytical Laboratory Certifications
Air and soil radioanalyses are performed by Energy Laboratories Incorporated - Casper and
vegetation samples are analyzed by GEL Laboratories, LLC. The Licensee had on file State of
Utah, Department of Health, Environmental Laboratory Certification Programs certificates for both
laboratories (expiration dates: 7/31/14 and 10/31/14, respectively).
Air, Soil, Vegetation Monitoring Reports
The data recorded are maintained in the Licensee's files. Information is compiled, evaluated,
summarized, and presented in the Semi-Annual Effluent Monitoring Report. The last report was
submitted to the Utah Division of Radiation Control on February 21, 2014.
Air Sample Collection Data and Equipment Calibrations
Air samples are collected weekly and submitted for analyses quarterly. Samples collected during
the quarter are submitted to the analytical laboratory accompanied by an air sampling data
spreadsheet. The total volume of air is calculated by multiplying the total time the sample was
being collected times the standard cubic feet per minute (scfm) which is then converted to liters.
It was found that the spreadsheet in use was not calculating the scfm as specified in the procedure
(Environmental Protection Manual, Section 1.1, Subsection 4.3). A value was assigned instead. It
could not be determined where the assigned values originated.
The Licensee revised the spreadsheet to include the calculations specified in the procedure and
demonstrated that there were no substantive differences in the calculated volumes. There is some
question regarding the origin of the formulae in the procedure and the values that are to be used for
the "a" and "b" "orifice constant" in calculating Qa (flow rate at field conditions). The MONTHLY
CALIBRATION WORKSHEET specifies values of 0.502178 for "a" and 0.495734 for "b" orifice
constants. The Licensee has two orifice standards, there should be two sets of orifice constants, one
set for each orifice. And it is speculated that the constants could change if the orifice characteristics
change as determined by the calibration of the orifice.
It was noted that the MONTHLY CALIBRATION WORKSHEET was being completed inconsistently
from week to week and upon further review the worksheet was not being completed properly in all
cases. The "Final Flow Rate" was not being recorded, instead pressure differential information was
reported.
Page 2 of 4
U:\MON_WAST\Bimai\wp\Inspections\Energy Fuel, Blanding, UT\2014\RADMOD-ENVIRO-
2014\InspectionReportRev0.doc
The air sampling pumps are calibrated in the field by using a calibrated orifice. The differential
pressure is adjusted using a U-tube H2O manometer (adjusted to 4 inches of water) attached to the
orifice housing which translates to a flow rate of approximately 37 ftVmin (cfm). In order to obtain
a more precise flow rate, adjustments need to be made for the orifice characteristics and the changes
in temperature and pressure. The adjustments prescribed by procedure should be validated by the
Licensee.
Closeout Meeting
The inspector held a closeout meeting with D. Hillsten, G. Palmer and D. Turk of Energy Fuels
Resources (USA) on June 26, 2014. The observations made during the inspection were summarized
during the meeting.
Conclusion
The Licensee has an active environmental monitoring program. A full-time staff manages the
program. Air, soil, and vegetation samples are obtained at the prescribed frequencies. Samples are
analyzed by Utah certified laboratories. Monitoring data are recorded, charted, tracked and
evaluated to identify and assess radiological trends.
Regarding the air sampling practices, the processes are performed by rote and which have not been
assessed recently to determine if the outputs have been altered or corrupted due to intentional or
inadvertent changes, over time, to assumptions and intricate technical calculations.
The Orifice Equation and the Standard Conditions Flow Rate Equation found in subsections 4.1
and 4.2, respectively, of the Environmental Protection Manual need to be validated.
The MONTHLY CALIBRATION WORKSHEET is not being filled out consistently or completely.
The worksheet calls for a "final flow rate" which is not being calculated. The formulae presented
on the worksheet do not correspond with those found in the Environmental Protection Manual.
The Licensee revised the air sampling spreadsheet to address concerns expressed in the closeout
meeting including calculating the SCFM and locking the cells to prevent inadvertent changes.
Recommendations for the Licensee
• Validate all equations in the Environmental Protection Manual for determining the flow rate
of the air samplers
• Ascertain the source and the values of the orifice constants used in the flow rate at field
conditions (Qa) equation.
• Determine if a constant temperature (298° K) and pressure (760 mm Hg) should be used to
represent absolute temperature and atmospheric pressure at orifice calibration or if the
temperature and pressure reported at the time of orifice calibration should be used in the
calculation for flow rate at standard conditions (Qs).
• Revise the MONTHLY CALIBRA TION WORKSHEET Ensure the equations on the
worksheet are identical to the validated equations in the procedure.
Page 3 of 4
U:\MON_WAST\Bimai\wp\Inspections\Energy Fuel, Blanding, UT\2014\RADMOD-ENVIRO-
2014\InspectionReportRev0.doc
• If "Final Flow Rate" column is retained on the worksheet then a flow rate must be entered
and not the pressure differential.
• Train the staff in properly completing the worksheet.
Note: The inspector conferred with K. Weinel via telephone on July 8 and 11, 2014 who concurred
with the issues with the equations and indicated the concerns would be addressed.
Recommendation for the DRC Director
It is recommended that no enforcement action be taken at this time.
Prepared By: Boyd M. Imai July 15,2014
(Name) ' CP (Signature) (Date)
Page 4 of 4
U:\MON_WAST\Bimai\wp\lnspections\Energy Fuel, Blanding, UT\2014\RADMOD-ENVIRO-
2014\InspectionReportRev0.doc
UTAH DIVISION OF RADIATION CONTROL
RADIATION PROTECTION INSPECTION MODULE
RADMOD-ENVIRO-2014
ENERGY FUELS - WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL LICENSE UT 1900479
References: Radioactive Materials License UT1900479, License Renewal Application Appendix A
Environmental Protection Manual, This inspection does not include seep and surface water sampling
because the DRC's Hydro-Geologists evaluate those sampling activities when they collect splits
samples of those activities.
I OPENING MEETING
DATE <J Z£t 2*( f
MEETING MEMBERS
NAME DRC/COMPANY CONTACT INFORMATION
&)^£.iZCV L-<> /!/(<<->_ iAAA-l^\^<\ €-:••*-
"DCLI/IJ Turk- gn^^ p^l> 9 M '". S
: Go to each environmental monitoring ocation and observe what type of monitoring is being done
Sampling
Locations
Radon
Monitoring
Air
Sampling
Gamma
Monitorin"
Soil
Sampling
Vegetation
Sampling
ZI BHV-
•[ BHV-2 ^Rx$^Z2, 05 NA
^'BHV-3 NA NA
BHV-4
BHV-5 NA
V BHV-6 of u NA
Comments: Yes • No • NA •
^7
^/observe the air filters being changed at each air monitoring station (BHV-1 through BHV-6). Were
any concerns observed?
Comments: Yes Q No O NA
Have the air pumps been calibrated monthly?
Comments: ' Yes £3 No • NA •
ytf' 1 lave the orifice plates been calibrated by a certified calibration laboratory using an EPA-approved
method?
Comments: Yes 53 No • NA •
?/^/^ _
Are microfiber glass filters utilized for particulate air sampling?
Comments: Yes JS No • NA •
E?tA XooO to &&TfA ft M
y. Observe how the used air filters are being handled and prepped for analysis. Were any concerns
observed?
Comments: Yes • No • NA^
f\ What laboratory does the Mill use for their Environmental Samples? Is it a Utah Certified Laboratory?
Comments: Yes ^ No • NA •
ST. During the Mill tour observe gamma monitoring locations. Are they in appropriate areas?
'Comments: ' Yes • No • NA JS
AM- <U^.
Is a function check ofthe meteorological monitoring equipment performed weekly?
Comments: Yes [3 No • NA •
^ Is the "data module"' exchanged monthly?
Comments: ~ ' Yes g] No • NA •
Jff. Is the downloaded data verified by an independent meteorological contractor?
Comments: " Yes jS No • NA •
l^f Go to the metrological station and observe w hat type of monitoring is being done. (Wind speed & dir.)
Comments: ~ Yes |S No • NA •
^(\3?ls precipitation being monitored using a standard NOAA rain gauge, or equivalent, and set up with
NOAA specifications? (KfojjJ^ g>U.
Comments: Yes JS No • NA •
^ca-Je.^ <r-ja-u*s_ <fc^rg/a, 3A/^*^
K. Are external gamma measurements taken quarterly at all BHV locations?
Comments: Yes No • NA •
y£ Are TLD placed one meter above the ground plane at each sampling site?
Comments: Yes L^l No • NA •
the TLDs analyzed and the data reviewed?
Comments: Yes |S No • NA •
Are Soil Samples collected annually (Aug.-Sept.) from the air sampling locations? (Analyzed for
Ra-226 and U-nat)
Comments: , Yes f^J No • NA •
^Hf. Are Vegetation Samples collected in early spring, late spring, and late fall at the following
locations:
"Ii. Northeast Area (near BHV-1)
~b. Northwest Area (112 mile west of BHV-1)
-c. Southwest Area (West of BHV-4 and south off Cell 3)?
(Analyzed for Ra-226 and PB-210) -—
Comments: V=M->\ Yes ^ No • NA •
DATE Jfr>*-3Cy 2*1 + CLOSEOUT MEETING
MEETING MEMBERS
NAME COMPANY CONTACT INFORMATION
PU. ^^-csr£ y fleets
3(
MONTHLY CALIBRATION WORKSHEET
(=
UJ
UI X CO
o 5
CO CD -C o c
o •* iri
Ei
cn
X E £
vt
N
co e
co
6 o P
iS ra £ 1 O 0.
CQ
i
o
X H
Z
o
o
3
o
<*1
c o
1
.0
_ «0
o O
'•g to
^ 3 o nj
•s &
$ E
CO CD
4 £
o
£ c
o „ „
S Q I-
CO
~y
o
T
q
Til
O
o zr
ca
o
3 0 0
a a
co
Hi
ex
C
°c c '5
CD
00
.!£
CD
CD
5
<0 o
T
IT
ra c
ra
03 CO
it
CD CD
1/ tl
0 o O
o o a T rr
VT;
0 Q
OI
c c c
'5 a) co ±z
CD
CD
8 0
tr
0<5
o a
T
QQ
O o -r
o
•3* O 1 3 U ra O
>.
s c o
CO
•s
T3
•o o o
22
XI c ca
€
ra a.
8
o
CD
£
c
o
CD .a 3
CO CO
p
CO _Q
°8
Q.
E
CO
-O
CO
CZ
CO
>
CD
£
OJ
c
CD
CD
E o c
CO
E
CD SZ «-»
E
e
o
CD
£
CD
c
CD
CD
a
3 C
O O
8 "co
CO c o
is
3 CT
CD
55 E
J2 •? J3
2 (D o
CT
CD
CD
£
E o
c 'co
3
s
E
o
"S
CO •o c 12
CO
0)
£
CD C
CO CD x: o c
CD
£
x:
E
S
CO CD
.C CJ
cr
k_
CD t5 E o c
CO
E
CD
£
CO 3
<
CN CO
S
E a
8
•c O
CM
d
ll a
a
50 O
s
a
a
II
a
c
CD E E o o
tr
o
tr
8 o tr
tr
0
o
X
CO
T
0 o tr
0 O T
0
Q
tr to
CO
CC J
UL 75 c Lu
txl
0
XT tr
O
3"
TP
CO
ri <
O
+3
C
c, o tr
O <0
ty
5 >
DQ
>
i ca
O
tr
> x ca
ra
81 ra
tJ
tr
tr
tie V
tr
3 ra
ra
> x
CO
X
ca
O
0
O
tJ*
0 0 0
T
Cfl
CM
>
X
co
5 x
CO
8
to
CO c o
ro
3 O co O >>
£
C
o 5
co •a
"E o o
CD
CO CO
CD
CO -Cl
oS
ci
E &
co"
CO
'l ro >
j; CD ? £
ra o
CD •*=
TO J?
Q. -.g CD CJ tf= •c o
CD
c
o ^_
S cr c
3 m P
r ® £
co
CD o c
CD
•4-*
CD E o c ca E
CD .C
E
p
5 o
CD
CD
c
CD •5
Q
c
3 O u u
CO c o •J=>
CO
CD £
•4—' W
o
•s
ca xi c
CO
CD
CD
c
.8
CD
a
CO 3
cr
CD
CD
CD £
O)
c
"co
CD JC
* (0 •*= «. //>
3
CD E o c co E
CD
£
CO 3 ••cy <
in 3
8 S
n
CO a
CO t-O CM CM —' c
•§ i
£ i
- o
2!
O) X
X O E E m o SL
O O) CD X
==• CO JH
oo ,y a
E
E
i ^
g 8
o £ (2 g
£ E
5 ?# fel
3 (0 10 = u
ts p e » -g 2
cu
3 CO to £
E 2
(U E I -2 o a)
XI 3
< O
II J3
CO <
H II
O Q.
E
CO — c — 0 w
1 o
° 1
s 8
fD ro
Q. m
a. o
CD x: Q. U) O
E
CO T3
iS t to ra
ra S
co 2
£ i
It?
LL II
it co
to u
a
CO CL
CNJ CO
8. I
LL
X
a II
in
a
c
CD
E E o O
o
B
CO
OH
o O
3"^
o
"XI CQ
CD CD
5
o
Q
T
Is*
0 o tr
O o
r
o
X
CR
TJ
CO
3
XJ
<
O
N
X
B
"co
c
O
X
o o
»0 o
X X J T
o
Ni <0
CD +^
C/3
> X CQ
> X CQ
in
X
CQ
> X CO
O) c "c c ra
CD ca
CD CD
0<3 !bO
5XD
o
o
"(SO
— Q
O O
rr rr"
X ^
4 o
on r?
3T
NI
O) C
c c
'ra
CD co
XL CD CD
i
0<
o o
j
0
Q
T
cy
r-
o o
T
bo
co
^0
0 O
Ixs
3 3 3
X
to tr
3 r V p-vc >a NO r-
O VJ
x X tr T CP OT
co c o
I
_o
co
O >. JZ +-* c o
2
CO
TJ
O O
£
XJ C CO
43 _cg
CL
CD U
o
CD ' c o
CD
CO CO
£
Q.
2
CO
ca
CL E
$
co"
0)
J3
CO •c CO >
CD £
c
3
O o o
CO c o +3 CO 3 cr CD
0 £
CD
c
CD Q
o
q=
CD £ cn c "co
3
a
5 o
5=
"E
CO XJ
c
CO to
0 iZ •f-< 0 c
0 CD
0
Q
co
3 cr 0
co 0 x: o c
0 JZ •4-"
.c o
to
E
E o c
CO E
0 £ -*-»
CO
3
XJ
<
in
E ••=-n co
13 t
•c s
r N CO
CD
ra
CC
1
ra O II
to
a
c CO CO t-O) CM CM •— — C C O
•2 1
8 2
CD J!
u a.
cct .t
tD ra
3 » E E H I 8.
CD E
1 -2
O CD
to
xi = < O
tn
^1
CD
u
D> X X o E E o £S
§' x t. E c E o
ni g
S ri
S 8 !£ fc o a.
CD 8
co ro 10 „ £ to
CL QJ
S Si tl e
LO CL O O
E 'S
SI
to d
0 to
S S
C (p
= E
CD E
E g
< x:
I' & to o a- E
11
CO
H
UJ
UI
X
CO
o 5 z o
OQ
O
X
z o s
CO CD X u c
o
iri
CM,
O) X
e
E
t-r
"T vO
cr
r*-
r-
crl -£2
_CD
O 42 Z (0
CD XI
JS "co
D. O
c
o
i
re O
To
2
3 CO CO CD
L 4
J
L
M \
u
c o
£
XI
c o
c «o o o
1
x> CD
Sl
CO CD
Q h-
o
zr
o
o
~t4
CO CD CO
CD CD
§ 8
T ZT
"X CX
a
T
CP
c <r w <r
CR
3"
OI
c
'S1
CQ
J£ CD CD
I
b3
rz "c
c
'il
CQ
X. CD CD
5
O *
vT-
53
o
ST-CJ-
•s-
rO ~5
O) c
c
rz
'si
CO
J£ CD CD
o
•3*
ecJ oo
•J
tr
8
3"
CO c O
ro
_o
CO
o
>« x +•< c o £
43 ro •o
"S o o
£ TJ C CO
s
ro
a.
CD
o
o
CD
£ c o
CD XI 3
CD -*—'
CD
E o c ro E
CD X
E
P.
CP
CD
£
CD C
CD
Q
CO CO CD
£
ro
XI
c« cl E a)
XI ro
*i_ ro >
CD
£
O) c •X) c 3 O o o ro
o
ro
3 CT CD
CD £ •*-«
o
0 £
OJ
cz
"co
3
iS
£
§ «=
"E co TJ c 43 To
0)
£
c
43 0 Q
c p
CO 3 cr 0
0 x
E
& fa*
CO 0 X o c
0 £
JZ 2 ro
E
o
CO 0 X o c
I
Q E o rz
CO E
0
£
to
3
O
E n
cl
1
o
& 9
<
00
l~
CN s
CO X I o
rr + E •* E if?
CJ) CM
CD I
S E CD ffi E * xt — •= CO £ E
O CO 1 g g 8
m E B 0 jB CO CO TJ
c .SB to CO
to 2 9J S
c CD
To t-ts
5- c?
T- CM CO I
LL
a a
II
V) a
H
UJ
UJ X
w
tt o
to CD X u c
o •*
LO
Ci-
CO X
E
E
dO
\*>
•~s>
c
o
E
Xt
r-
r~
_co
^ to H2
(J
co v.
s
E
CD XI
« '"co £
Q_ O Q-
ro
OSS 3 CO CO 5 42 i
o
CQ
>-
•J
C
\0
o
° "ft
x O
CD
c to
O O
^ ra
X) CD
cl 3
O to
c _ _
o ro CD 2 Q I-
v-0
X
o
c
CO CD CQ
CD CD
T
rr
ty
vr
a-CV)
oa
CO c "c c
'il
CQ CD CD
cy? cr
5<
cr
fl
>3
o-
<r- cr
<3-
« !jq
0C
(V/
cr- v7-
0<3 ca-rl
O
V
ra c "c c
'si
CQ
J<: CD CD
CT" o
c c
'SI
CQ
JsC
CD
CD
<r
til <*
tin cr
«5C
cr
be
Cr
V T _ <r CO c o
1
3 O ro
O
>.
x
c
o
43 ro
TJ
X) c ro
43 ro
CL
CD o
it— •c o
I
ro
CO CO
ro xi
o<3
cl
E
CD
CO CD
XI
ro
8 ro ro >
CD X
CD C
3 O o o ro
c o
"to 3 cr
CD •= CD £ >- "S
o
co c "co
3
5 o q=
TE ro
TJ
c 1 il
CD X
CD
c
CD X
CD
c
c g '-+—-ro
3
cr
CD
CD
£
E
E CO CD X o c
CD X
•J: ro
x
43 ro
E
Q
co CD X o c
CD
E o c ro E
CD
£
to
3
CN CO
O
E n
cl
00 r-
CM
d
u
IB
a
x "S "S TT c?
~ ^ ^ <
X
a Cf
ll
tn O
3> to
8 «
aj 2. CL
u II
to O
Air Sampling Collection
Spreadsheets
Boyd Imai <t>[e-mail]>
White Mesa Mill Spreadsheet
David Turk <[e-mail]>
To: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 1:41 PM
Sir,
Attached are a before and after spreadsheet for the air stations. Let me know if there are any questions
regarding the information.
David Turk
Klanauur Fnvimnrrvntnl Health and Safety
t: 435-678-2221 xi 13 | c: 435-459-9786 | f: 435-678-2224
6425 S. Highway 191 PO Box 809
Blanding, UT, US, 84511
http://www.energyfuels.com
This e-mail is intended for the exclusive use the of person(s) mentioned as the recipient(s). This message and
any attached files with it are confidential and may contain privileged or proprietary information. If you are not the
intended recipient(s) please delete this message and notify the sender. You may not use, distribute print or copy
this message if you are not the intended recipient(s).
2 attachments
David
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
BHV Spreadsheet (after).pdf
121K
BHV Spreadsheet (before).pdf
113K
Boyd Imai <[e-mail]> Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 7:18 AM
Period: March 31, 2014 through , July e., 2014 (2nd Quarter 2014)
BHV-1 on stream % 98.8% BHV-1 Total Volume: r-
4.76E+06
Page 1
Week
#
Filter
Number
Start
Date
Stop
•ate Gross Tare Net
Stop
Time
Start
Time
Total
Time
Total
Liters
Loading,
mg/m 3
Per Cent
On Stream SCFM
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
IO
ll
12
13
8400159
8400150
8400147
8400141
8400132
8400128
8400120
8400117
8400111
8400102
8951299
8951290
8951286
3I-Mar-14
07-Apr-14
14-Apr-14
21-Apr-14
28-Apr-14
05-May-14
12-May-14
I9-May-14
26-May-14
02-Jun-14
09-Jun-14
16-Jun-14
23-Jun-14
7-Apr-14
14-Apr-14
21-Apr-14
28-Apr-14
5-May-14
I2-May-I4
I9-May-I4
26-May-14
2-Jun-14
9-Jun-14
I6-Jun-14
23-Jun-l4
30-Jun-i4
4.8063
4.6346
4.8566
4.7298
4.7308
4.5391
4.5319
4.6629
4.4344
4.4623
4.9799
5.1655
4.7708
4.2971
4.3412
4.3218
4.1975
4,2644
4.2729
4.2590
4.2162
4.1909
4.2810
4.5222
4.5152
4.5006
0.5092
0.2934
0.5348
0.5323
0.4664
0.2662
0.2729
0.4467
0.2435
0.1813
0.4577
0.6503
0.2702
54795.5
54961.7
55130,8
55297.0
55467.1
55609.4
55777.7
55969 6
56115,1
56280.9
56448.8
56641.4
56784.9
54627.9
54795.5
54961.7
55130,8
55297.0
55467.1
55609.4
55777.7
55969.6
56115.1
56280.9
56448.8
566414
10054.8
9972.0
10144.8
9972.0
10206.0
8537.4
10096.2
11518.8
8727.6
9945.6
10076.4
1 1557.8
8607.0
10,392,289
10,447,897
10,628,944
10,447,897
10,693,064
8,944,833
10,549,435
12,035,898
9,119,396
10,307,586
10,386,080
11,913,009
8,871,521
0.0490
0.0281
0.0503
0.0509
0.0436
0.0298
0.0259
0.0371
0.0267
0.0176
0.0441
0.0546
0.0305
99.8".
98.9°o
100.6".
98.9".
101.2".
84.7",
100.2°.
114.3%
86.6°.
98.7%
100.0".
114.7%
85.4%
Totals 91 2184.0 4.715762 4.321538 0.3942 129416.4 134,737,849 0.0375 98.1
BHV-2 on stream % 99.9% BHV-2 Total Volume: 4.81E+06
Week
#
Filter
Number
Start
Date
Stop
Date Gross Tare Net
Stop
Time
Start
Time
Total
Time
Total
Liters
Loading,
mg/m3
Per Cent
On Stream
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
8400158
8400151
8400146
8400140
8400133
8400129
8400121
8400116
8400110
8400103
6951298
8951291
8951285
31-Mar-14
07-Apr-14
14-Apr-14
21-Apr-14
28-Apr-14
05-May-14
12-May-14
19-May-14
26-May-14
02-Jun-14
09-Jun-14
16-Jun-14
23-Jun-14
07-Apr-14
14-Apr-14
21-Apr-14
28-Apr-14
05-May-14
12-May-14
19-May-14
26-May-14
02-Jun-14
09-Jun-14
16-Jun-14
23-Jun-14
30-Jun-14
4.5918
4.6736
4.7082
4.8015
4.5305
4.7203
4.4577
4.7318
4.5476
4.5685
4.9192
5.2519
4.7890
4.2783
4.2849
4.3398
4.3331
4.2645
4.2497
4.1937
4.2443
4.2523
4.2733
4.5293
4.5034
4.4948
0.3135
0.3887
0,3684
0.4684
0.2660
0.4706
0.2640
0.4875
0.2953
0.2952
03899
0.7485
0.2942
65061.7
65228.1
65397.1
65564.4
65733.1
65899.6
66068.2
66260.2
66405.4
66571.4
66739.4
66932.0
67075.4
64893.9
65061.7
65228.1
65397.1
655644
65733.1
65899.6
66068.2
66260.2
66405.4
66571.4
66739.4
66932.0
10065.6
9981.0
10142.4
10036.2
10121.4
9995.4
10113.6
11519.4
8711.4
9961.2
10077.6
11556.6
8605.2
10.403,451
10,457,327
10,626,429
10,515,161
10,604,427
10.472.414
10,567,616
12,036,525
9,102.469
10,323,754
10,387,317
11,911,772
8,869,666
00301
0,0372
0.0347
0.0445
0.0251
0.0449
0.0250
0.0405
0.0324
0.0286
0.0375
0.0628
0.0332
99.9%
99.0%
100.6%
99 6%
100.4%
99.2%
100.3%
114.3%
86.4%
98.8%
100.0%
114.6%
85.4%
Totals 91 2184.0 4.714738 4 32626 0.3885 130887 136,278,327 0.0367 99.9%
BHV-4 on stream % 99.8% BHV-4 Total Volume: 4.81 E+06
Week
#
Filter
Number
Start
Date
Stop
Date Gross Tare Net
Stop
Time
Start
Time
Total
Time
Total
Liters
Loading.
mg/m3
Per Cent
On Stream
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
8400157
8400152
8400145
8400139
8400134
8400127
8400122
8400115
8400109
8400104
8951297
8951292
8951284
31-Mar-14
07-Apr-14
14-Apr-14
21-Apr-14
28-Apr-14
05-May-14
12-May-14
19-May-14
26-May-14
02-Jun-14
09-Jun-14
16-Jun-14
23-Jun-14
07-Apr-14
14-Apr-14
21-Apr-14
28-Apr-14
05-May-14
12-May-14
19-May-14
26-May-14
02-Jun-14
09-Jun-14
16-Jun-14
23-Jun-14
30-Jun-14
4.5233
4.4959
4.45 6 4
4.6815
4.4871
4.4879
4.4076
4.4733
4.3529
4.2784
4.6324
4.9105
4.6131
4.3132
4.3393
4.3082
4.3499
4.2187
4.2615
4.2468
4.2211
4.2575
4.2379
4.5053
4.4993
4.4796
0.2101
0.1566
0.1482
0.3316
0.2684
0.2264
0.1608
0.2522
0.0954
0.0405
0.1271
0.4112
0.1335
40283.2
40448.5
40616.8
40784.0
40952.7
41119.5
41287.9
41480.0
41623.7
41790.7
41958.5
42151.3
42296.3
40116.1
40283.2
40448.5
40616.8
40784.0
40952.7
41119.5
41287.9
41480.0
41623.7
41790.7
41958.5
42151.3
10025.4
9920.4
10097.4
10032.6
10121.4
10005.6
10103.4
1 1525.4
8622.6
10018.2
10072.2
11567.4
8698.2
10,361,902
10,393,835
10,579,282
10,511,389
10,604,427
10,483,101
10,556,958
12,042,794
9,009,683
10.3B2.828
10,381,751
11,922.904
8,965.524
0.0203
0.0151
0.0140
0.0315
0.0253
0.0216
0.0152
0.0209
0.0106
0.0039
0.0122
0.0345
0.0149
99.5%
98.4%
100.2%
99.5%
100.4%
99.3%
100.2%
114.3%
85.5%
994%
99.9%
114.8%
86.3%
Totals 91 2184.0 4.5231 4.32602 0.1971 130810.2 136,196,377 0.0185 99 8%
BHV-5 on stream % 94.3% BHV-5 Total Volume: 4.54E+06
Week # Filter
Number
Start
Date
Stop
Date Gross Tare Net
Stop
Time
Start
Time
Total
Time
Total
Liters
Loading,
mg/m3
Per Cent
On Stream SCFM
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
8400156
8400153
8400144
8400138
8400135
8400126
8400123
8400114
8400108
8400105
8951296
8951293
8951283
31-Mar-14
07-Apr-14
14-Apr-14
21-Apr-14
28-Apr-14
05-May-14
12-May-14
19-May-14
26-May-14
02-Jun-14
09-Jun-14
16-Jun-14
23-Jun-14
07-Apr-14
14-Apr-14
21-Apr-14
28-Apr-14
05-May-14
12-May-14
19-May-14
26-May-14
02-Jun-14
09-Jun-14
16-Jun-14
23-Jun-14
30-Jun-14
4.5511
4.5757
4.4912
4.7322
4.6506
4.7119
4.4569
4.5856
4.4289
4.5284
4.8025
5.0595
4.7259
4.3099
4.3419
4.3236
4.3297
4.2623
4.2860
4.2558
4.2085
4.2320
4.2599
4.5117
4.4744
4.5147
0.2412
0.2338
0.1676
0.4025
0.3883
0.4259
0.2011
0.3771
0.1969
0.2685
0.2908
0.5851
0.2112
64090.2
64255.4
64423.8
64591.0
64759.8
64926.4
65094.8
65286.5
65309.6
65476.5
65644.0
65836.8
65981.8
63922.7
64090.2
64255.4
64423.8
64591.0
64759.8
64926.4
65094.8
65286.5
65309.6
65476.5
65644.0
65836.8
10050.6
99I2.0
10I02.2
10033.8
10128.6
9997.8
10105.2
11502.0
1386.0
10012.8
10050.0
11567.4
8697.6
10,387,948
10,385,034
10,584,311
10,512,646
10,611.971
10.474,928
10,558,839
12,018,344
I, 448,220
10,377,232
10,358,869
II, 922.904
8,964.905
0.0232
0.0225
0.0158
0.0383
0.0366
0.0407
0.0190
0.0314
0.1360
0.0259
0.0281
0.0491
0.0236
99.7%
98.3%
100.2%
99.5%
100.5%
99.2%
100.2%
114.1%
13.7%
99.3%
99,7%
114.8%
86.3%
Totals 91 2184.0 4.638492 4.33157 0.3069 123546 128,606.150 0.0377 94.3%
Period: March 31, 2014 through , July 2, 2014 (2nd Quarter 2014) Page 2
BHV-6 on stream % 99.8% BHV-6 Total Volume: 4.81 E+06
Week # Filter
Number
Start
Date
Slop
Date Gross Tare Net
Stop
Time
Start
Time
Total
Time
Total
Liters
Loading,
mg/m3
Per Cent
On Stream SCFM
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
8400155
8400154
8400143
8400137
8400136
8400125
8400124
8400113
8400107
8400106
8951295
8951288
8951282
31-Mar-14
07-Apr-14
14-Apr-14
21-Apr-14
28-Apr-14
05-May-14
12-May-14
19-May-14
26-May-14
02-Jun-14
09-Jun-14
16-Jun-14
23-Jun-14
07-Apr-14
14-Apr-14
21-Apr-14
28-Apr-14
05-May-14
12-May-14
19-May-14
26-May-14
02-Jun-14
09-Jun-14
16-Jun-14
23-Jun-14
30-Jun-14
4.5391
4.4706
4.5014
4.5892
4.5218
4.5757
4.3878
4.5858
4.4341
4.4956
4.8099
4.9500
4.6910
4.2920
4.2914
4.3430
4.2697
4.2683
4.2441
4.2126
4.2617
4.2544
4.2648
4.5055
4.5046
4.5023
0.2471
0.1792
0.1584
0.2995
0.2535
0.3316
0.1752
0.3241
0.1797
0.2308
0.3044
0.4454
0.1887
12485.2
12652.2
164.1
331.3
500.0
666.7
835.2
1027.2
1171.1
1338.0
1505.6
1698.4
1845.7
12318.1
12485.2
0.0
164.1
331.3
500.0
666.7
835.2
1027.2
1171.1
1338.0
1505 8
16984
10026.6
10020 0
9844.8
10032.6
10124.4
10002.0
10105 8
11524.2
8630.4
100140
10071.0
11557.2
8834.4
10,363,142
10,498,188
10,314,627
10,511,389
10,607,570
10,479,329
10,559,466
12,041,540
9,017,833
10,378.476
10,380,514
11,912,390
9,105.910
0.0238
0.0171
0.0154
0.0285
0.0239
0.0316
0.0166
0.0269
0.0199
0.0222
0.0293
0.0374
0.0207
99.5%
99.4%
97.7%
99.5%
100.4%
99.2%
100.3%
114.3%
85 6%
99.3%
99.9%
114.7%
87.6%
Totals 91 2184 0 4.580923 4.32572 0.2552 130787.4 136,170,374 0.0241 99.8%
ALL BHV on stream % 98.5%
Week
tt Blanks
Start
Date
Stop
Date Net
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
8400149
8400148
8400142
8400131
8400130
8400119
8400118
8400112
8400101
8951300
8951289
8951287
8951276
Totals
31-Mar-14
07-Apr-14
14-Apr-14
21-Apr-14
28-Apr-14
05-May-14
12-May-14
19-May-14
26-May-14
02-Jun-14
09-Jun-14
1B-Jun-14
23-Jun-14
91
07-Apr-14
14-Apr-14
21-Apr-14
28-Apr-14
05-May-14
12-May-14
19-May-14
26-May-14
02-Jun-14
09-Jun-14
16-Jun-14
23-Jun-14
30-Jun-14
2184.0
4.3292
4.3029
4 3273
4.2278
4.2608
4.2455
4 1979
4.2549
4 2409
4.5127
4.5030
4.4919
4.5445
4.3415
Period: March 31,2014 through, July 2,2014 (2nd Quarter 2014)
BHV-1 on stream % 98.8% BHV-1 Total Volume:
Page 1
4.80E+06
Number Date Date Gross Tare Net Stop Time Start Time Total Time Total Liters
Loading
mg/m3
Percent
On Stream SCFM
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
II
12
13
8400159
8400150
8400147
8400141
8400132
8400128
8400120
8400117
8400111
8400102
8951299
8951290
8951286
31-Mar-14
07-Apr-14
14-Apr-I4
21-Apr-I4
28-Apr-14
05-May-14
I2-May-I4
19-May-14
26-May-14
02-Jun-14
09-Jun-!4
16-Jun-14
23-Jun-14
7-Apr-l4
14-Apr-14
21-Apr-14
28-Apr-14
5-May-l4
I2-May-I4
19-May-14
26-May-14
2-Jun-14
9-Jun-14
16-Jun-14
23-Jun-14
30-Jun-14
4.8063
4.6346
4.8566
4.7298
4.7308
4.5391
4.5319
4.6629
4.4344
4.4623
4.9799
5.1655
4.7708
4.2971
4 3412
4.3218
4.1975
4.2644
4.2729
4.2590
4.2162
4.1909
4.2810
4.5222
4.5152
4.5006
0.5092
0.2934
0.5348
0.5323
0.4664
0.2662
0.2729
0.4467
0.2435
0.1813
0.4577
0.6503
0.2702
54795.5
54961.7
55130.8
55297.0
55467.1
55609.4
55777.7
55969.6
56115.1
56280.9
56448.8
56641.4
56784.9
54627.9
54795.5
54961.7
55130.8
55297.0
55467.1
55609.4
55777.7
55969.6
56115.1
56280.9
56448.8
56641.4
10054.8
9972.0
10144.8
9972.0
10206.0
8537.4
10096.2
11518.8
B727.6
9945.6
10076.4
11557.8
8607.0
10,738,617
10,650,186
10,834,738
10,650,186
10,900,100
8,985,958
10,626,658
12,124,002
9,186,151
10,219,152
10,353,550
1 1,875,695
8,843,734
0.0474
0.0275
0.0494
0.0500
0.0428
0.0296
0.0257
0.0368
0.0265
0.0177
0.0442
0.0548
0.0306
99.8%
98.9%
100.6%
98.9%
101.2%
84.7%
100.2%
114.3%
86.6%
98.7%
100.0%
114.7%
85.4%
Totals 91 2184.0 4.715762 4.321538 0.3942 129416.4 135,988,725 0.0372 98.8°
BHV-2 on stream % 99.9% BHV-2 Total Volume: 4.86E+06
Week
U
Filter
Number
Start
Date
Stop
Date Gross Tare Net
Stop
Time
Start
Time
Total
Time
Total
Liters
Loading,
mg/m3
Per Cent
On Stream
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
8400158
8400151
8400146
8400140
8400133
8400129
8400121
8400116
8400110
8400103
8951298
8951291
8951285
31-Mar-14
07-Apr-14
14-Apr-14
21-Apr-14
28-Apr-14
05-May-14
12-May-14
19-May-14
26-May-14
02-Jun-14
09-Jun-14
16-Jun-14
23-Jun-14
07-Apr-14
14~Apr-14
21-Apr-14
28-Apr-14
05-May-14
12-May-14
19-May-14
26-May-14
02-Jun-14
09-Jun-14
16-Jun-14
23-Jun-14
30-Jun-14
4.6918
4.6736
4.7082
4.8015
4.5305
4.7203
4.4577
4.7318
4.5476
4.5685
4.9192
5.2519
4.7890
4.2783
4.2849
4.3398
4.3331
4.2645
4.2497
4.1937
4.2443
4.2523
4.2733
4.5293
4.5034
4.4948
0.3135
0.3887
0.3684
0.4684
0.2660
0.4706
0.2640
0.4875
0.2953
0.2952
0.3899
0.7485
0.2942
65061.7
65228.1
65397.1
65564.4
65733.1
65699.6
66068.2
66260.2
66405.4
66571.4
66739.4
66932.0
67075.4
64893.9
65061.7
65228.1
65397.1
65564.4
65733.1
65899.6
66068.2
66260.2
66405.4
66571.4
66739.4
66932.0
10065.6
9981.0
10142.4
10036.2
10121.4
9995.4
10113.6
11519.4
8711.4
9961.2
10077.6
1 1556.6
8605.2
10,750,151
10,659,798
10,832,174
10,718,752
10,809,746
10.520,562
10,644,972
12,124,633
9,169,100
10,235,181
10,354,783
11,874.462
B,841,885
0.0292
0.0365
0.0340
0.0437
0.0246
0.0447
0.0248
0.0402
0.0322
0.0288
0.0377
0.0630
0.0333
99.9%
99.0%
100.6%
99.6%
100.4%
99.2%
100.3%
114.3%
86.4%
98.8%
100.0%
114.6%
854%
Totals 91 2184.0 4.714738 4.32626 0.3885 130887 137,536.199 0.0364 99.9%
BHV-4 on stream % 99.8% BHV-4 Total Volume: 4.85E+06
Week
#
Filter
Number
Start
Date
Stop
Date Gross Tare Net
Stop
Time
Start
Time
Total
Time
Total
Liters
Loading,
mg/m 3
Per Cent
On Stream
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
8400157
8400152
8400145
8400139
8400134
8400127
8400122
8400115
8400109
8400104
8951297
8951292
8951284
31-Mar-14
07-Apr-14
14-Apr-14
21-Apr-14
28-Apr-14
05-May-14
12-May-14
19-May-14
26-May-14
02-Jun-14
09-Jun-14
16-Jun-14
23-Jun-14
07-Apr-14
14-Apr-14
21-Apr-14
28-Apr-14
05-May-14
12-May-14
19-May-14
26-May-14
02-Jun-14
09-Jun-14
16-Jun-14
23-Jun-14
30-Jun-14
4.5233
4.4959
4.4564
4.6815
4.4871
4.4879
4.4076
4.4733
4.3529
4.2784
4.6324
4.9105
4.6131
4.3132
4.3393
4.3082
4.3499
4.2187
4.2615
4.2468
4.2211
4.2575
4.2379
4.5053
4.4993
4.4796
0.2101
0.1566
0.1482
0.3316
0.2684
0.2264
0.1608
0.2522
0.0954
0.0405
0.1271
0.4112
0.1335
40283.2
40448.5
40616.8
40784.0
40952.7
41119.5
41287.9
41480.0
41623.7
41790.7
41958.5
42151.3
42296.3
40116.1
40283.2
40448.5
40616.8
40784.0
40952.7
41119.5
41287.9
41480.0
41623.7
41790.7
41958.5
42151.3
10025.4
9920.4
10097.4
10032.6
10121.4
10005.6
10103.4
1 1525.4
8622.6
10018.2
10072.2
11567.4
8698.2
10,707,217
10,595,076
10,784,114
10,714,907
10,809,746
10,531,298
10,634,236
12,130,949
9,075,634
10,293,749
10,349,234
11,885,559
8,937.443
0.0196
0.0148
0.0137
0.0309
0.0248
0.0215
0.0151
0.0208
0.0105
0.0039
0.0123
0.0346
0.0149
99.5%
98.4%
100.2%
99.5%
100.4%
99.3%
100.2%
114.3%
85.5%
99.4%
99.9%
114.8%
86.3%
Totals 91 2184.0 4.5231 4.32602 0.1971 130810.2 137,449,163 0.0183 99.8%
BHV-5 on stream % 94.3% BHV-5 Total Volume: 4.58E+06
Week
#
Filter
Number
Start
Date
Slop
Date Gross Tare Net
Stop
Time
Start
Time
Total
Time
Total
Liters
Loading,
mg/m3
Per Cent
On Stream SCFM
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
8400156
8400153
8400144
8400138
8400135
8400126
8400123
8400114
8400108
8400105
8951296
8951293
8951283
31-Mar-14
07-Apr-14
14-Apr-14
21-Apr-14
28-Apr-14
05-May-14
12-May-14
19-May-14
26-May-14
02-Jun-14
09-Jun-14
16-Jun-14
23-Jun-14
07-Apr-14
14-Apr-14
21-Apr-14
28-Apr-14
05-May-14
12-May-14
19-May-14
26-May-14
02-Jun-14
09-Jun-14
16-Jun-14
23-Jun-14
30-Jun-14
4.5511
4.5757
4.4912
4.7322
4.6506
4.7119
4.4569
4.5856
4.4289
4.5284
4.8025
5.0595
4.7259
4.3099
4.3419
4.3236
4.3297
4.2623
4.2860
4.2558
4.2085
4.2320
4.2599
4,5117
4.4744
4.5147
0.2412
0.2338
0.1676
0.4025
0.3883
0.4259
0.2011
0.3771
0.1969
0.2685
0.2908
0.5851
0.2112
84090.2
64255.4
64423.8
64591.0
64759.8
64926.4
65094.8
65286.5
65309.6
65476.5
65644.0
65836.8
65981.8
63922.7
64090.2
64255.4
64423.8
64591.0
64759.8
64926.4
65094.8
65286.5
65309.6
65476.5
65644.0
65836.8
10050.6
9912.0
10102.2
10033.8
10128.6
9997.8
10105.2
11502.0
1386.0
10012.8
10050.0
11567.4
8697.6
10,734,131
10,586,105
10,789,240
10,716,189
10,817,436
10,523,088
10,636,131
12,106,319
I, 458,821
10,288,200
10,326,424
II, 885,559
8,936,826
0.0225
0.0221
0.0155
0.0376
0.0359
0.0405
0.0189
0.0311
0.1350
0.0261
0.0282
0.0492
0.0236
99.7%
98.3%
100.2%
99.5%
100.5%
99.2%
100.2%
114.1%
13.7%
99.3%
99.7%
114.8%
86.3%
Totals 91 2184.0 4.638492 4.33157 0.3069 123546 129,604,469 0.0374 94.3%
Period: March 31, 2014 through , July 2, 2014 (2nd Quarter 2014) Page 2
BHV-6 on stream % 99.8% BHV-6 Total Volume- 4.85E+06
Week
#
Filler
Number
Start
Date
Stop
Date Gross Tare Net
Stop
Time
Start
Time
Total
Time
Total
Liters
Loading,
mg/m 3
Per Cent
On Stream SCFM
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
8400155
8400154
8400143
B400137
B400136
8400125
8400124
8400113
8400107
8400106
8951295
6951288
8951282
31-Mar-14
07-Apr-14
14-Apr-14
21-Apr-14
28-Apr-14
05-May-14
12-May-14
19-May-14
26-May-14
02-Jun-14
09-Jun-14
16-Jun-14
23-Jun-14
07-Apr-14
14-Apr-14
21-Apr-14
2B-Apr-14
05-May-14
12-May-14
19-May-14
26-May-14
02-Jun-14
09-Jun-14
16-Jun-14
23-Jun-14
30-Jun-14
4.5391
4.4706
4.5014
4.5892
4.5218
4.5757
4.3878
4.5858
4.4341
4.4956
4.8099
4.9500
4.6910
4.2920
4.2914
4.3430
4.2897
4.2683
4.2441
4.2126
4.2617
4.2544
4.2648
4.5055
4.5046
4.5023
0 2471
0.1792
0.1584
0.2995
0.2535
0.3316
0.1752
0 3241
0 1797
0.2308
0.3044
0.4454
0.1887
12485 2
12652.2
164.1
331.3
500 0
666.7
835.2
1027.2
1171.1
1338 0
1505.8
169B.4
1845.7
12318.1
12485.2
0.0
164.1
331 3
500.0
666.7
835.2
1027.2
1171.1
1338.0
1505.8
1698.4
10026.6
10020.0
9844.8
10032.6
10124.4
10002.0
10105.8
11524.2
8630.4
10014.0
10071.0
1 1557.2
8834 4
10,708,499
10.701,450
10,514,335
10,714,907
10.812,950
10,527,509
10,636,762
12,129,685
9,083,844
10.289,433
10,348.001
11.875.079
9,077.389
0.0231
0.0167
0.0151
0.0280
0.0234
0.0315
0.0165
0.0267
0.0198
0.0224
0.0294
0.0375
0.0208
99.5%
99.4%
97.7%
99.5%
100 4%
99.2%
100.3%
114 3%
85.6%
99.3%
99.9%
114 7%
87.6%
Totals 91 2184.0 4.580923 4.32572 0.2552 130787.4 137,419.844 0.0239 99.8%
ALL BHV on stream % 98.5%
Week # Blanks
Start
Dale
Stop
Date Net
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
8400149
8400148
8400142
8400131
8400130
8400119
8400118
8400112
8400101
8951300
8951289
8951287
8951276
Totals
31-Mar-14
07-Apr-14
14-Apr-14
21-Apr-14
28-Apr-14
05-May-14
12-May-14
19-May-14
26-May-14
02-Jun-14
09-Jun-14
16-Jun-14
23-Jun-14
91
07-Apr-14
14-Apr-14
21-Apr-14
28-Apr-14
05-May-14
12-May-14
19-May-14
26-May-14
02-Jun-14
09-Jun-14
16-Jun-14
23-Jun-14
30-Jun-14
2184.0
4.3292
4 3029
43273
4.2278
4.2608
4.2455
4.1979
4.2549
4.2409
4.5127
4.5030
4.4919
4 5445
4 3415
EScr in E 2 8
•o 9 ^
s a
P P
r^r^r^r^r^fNfNfNfNr'ir'irnrn r^i^r^^r^fNfNC^C^r^c^c^rn
Q oo -O ,
CL O
*t rf O r- f» O O co r> co r> n fN O Vi \o r- t (N (N fO M - Tf oooooooooooo OOOOOOOOOOOOztt
r^^oosooQftoofN_.rNOv"t
— OOf^tJOOSw^OrTw^'V^O ~ f^-, —;i — —;*n >q od" o' T' o' o' -O - os rn m' * - " ' * tN fN S - r-»
— ™ fN rn C» O" O o" O" O ^ O" tN Q^* O O —*
E
I
ra
o
H
s
o
o S -
0 ^- fN
__. fN O — o r~ o -~ — ^ *** ^ v, r 5 o ^
— c> — — — i! Z * ^ 2 Z
. m <N JC — —
— O — £ —
o r> o *ri o oo
>
X
ID
r-i \o r-» o > i
m
o
CN
i
3
a
"D C CM
O
CM _ CM" >»
3
inr^ooo — Tj-r^sO — oi oo ^ in^-or^r^or^oinooo — r>\omo^oor^sO — oo^fTf r^O^-rN^f^Or-O^-rNTfO TfTfvi/iiniriirii/i>OyO^>0
fNTfOOr'lTffNOr^W^rnr^rnO OfiTfrN'-O^OfN'Or*") — t"^00 OOr^mvOvor^TfTa-ooinv-iO mrNmiriTffNfNTfrN - Tf O
oooooooooooo o" o b
— tNOOU-irfOOfNOOfNfN r- — •— r~-rfrNjOxOO — fN<Jo o^ffNOOr-^m — t> oo IN -(Nmn-fNNfNrs-rN^m
Tf Tf Tf Tf t Tf Tf Tj" Tf Tj-
ooooor^r^u-iw-ivo**j"^rc^ —
x:
CO 3 O
o .
CM
ra
s
T3
o a a. >
X CD
c-t o o m
O O — tN
— — — — „_.„_ — _r-J(N
oooooooooo — —
00OO0O0O0O»r»>n
oooooooooooooooooooooooo
•c
CO I 2
> I m
r— r- r—
vD r- oo o
o>— tNi^iTr^'Or-oo
r— r- t— r- r- r— r-
S 3
r— oo o
\0 r-~ oc
•J) r> oo I/I 'i oo t> 6 ri A 4 iA >i r~
J- f ^ oo * 3
r- <>
5 S
*T T i/l <^
Tf <o sO r*> 00
« r- » t>
r- oo o LUUJUJLIJLIJLULULLJLLJLIJI
O0 fM —
0) S -t * e> o o — CN m v> tN m r*i m >© oo-ooor-r-ioin'C 3 a g
5 4? t>
o
2
3
r- i— r-r» r- r-i— r- r—
^ u", >o r-~ oo
VVVVVVVVVVYVV
O)
e
- IN n
I
1
I
I I I
a
1
s
I
I
j
I
II Illlllllllr Iflflllllllfli
??????
Illliili
Iftf'
11
lim!!!
I
linn
Environmental Monitoring
Garrin Palmer <[e-mail]> Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:32 AM
To: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
Cc: David Turk <[e-mail]>
Mr. Imai,
Atmospheric pressure is taken from a desktop instrument and then verified on the national weather service
website. We are planning to have McVehil-Monett add barometric pressure to our weather station parameters in
September. Once that is in place we will use that for our readings in the future.
Temperature is taken from a calibrated thermometer out in the field during calibration activities.
hope that helps. Let me know if you have any more questions. Thanks
Garrin Palmer
6425 S. Highway 191 PO Box 809
Blanding, UT, US, 84511
hitpV/www.energ yfuels.com
This e-mail is intended for the exclusive use the of person(s) mentioned as the recipient(s). This message and
any attached files with it are confidential and may contain privileged or proprietary information. If you are not the
intended recipient(s) please delete this message and notify the sender. You may not use, distribute print or copy
this message if you are not the intended recipient(s).
Boyd Imai <[e-mail]> Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:49 AM
To: Garrin Palmer <[e-mail]>
Cc: "Turk, David" <[e-mail]>
Thank you, Garrin, for the quick response and the information. This will aid in completing my report. Thanks.
-boyd-
[Quoted text hidden]
Boyd Imai
Utah Division of Radiation Control
[phone]
Mr Sampling and Calibration
Procedure Excerpt
White Mesa Mill - Standard Operating Procedures
Book #11, Environmental Protection Manual, Section 1.1
Date: 2/07 Revision: DUSA-3
Page 3 of 6
3.0 CALIBRATION
3.1 Orifice Plate
The orifice plates shall be calibrated every year as recommended by the EPA. A certified
calibration laboratory that will use the EPA or an EPA-approved method will do the
calibration. Calibration records are kept in the environmental files.
3.2 Sampler
Sampler airflow rates are checked weekly by visual observation of the analog meter,
graduated in standard cubic feet per minute.
Calibration of the equipment occurs during the first Monday of each month. If a non-
scheduled motor replacement is necessary, the sampler is re-calibrated.
An orifice plate assembly and U-tube manometer are used for monthly calibrations.
The sampler flow rate is regulated to a standard air volume that is recorded on the field
calibration sheet using 20°C. (298 K) and 29.2 inches (760 mm) of mercury as standard
conditions. A monthly calibration worksheet (Attachment C) is completed for each air
sampling station and retained in the files.
The monthly calibration task involves the following:
1. Before visiting each monitoring location, the air temperature and barometric
pressure are recorded.
2. The motors are replaced as required. The replacement motors are prepared at the
Mill office.
3. The new filter is placed on the vacuum head, and the orifice plate is secured on
top of the filter.
4. The orifice plate is connected to the U-tube manometer and the initial inches H2O
is recorded.
5. The control screw is adjusted as necessary to advance or slow the vacuum motor
to reach the desired flow rate. The final flow rate must be at least 32 scfm on the
analog meter and reach 75% on-stream time for the quarter to meet the required
LLD for the radionuclide parameters.
6. The U-tube manometer level, in inches, is then recorded and a flow rate
calculated.
4.0 CALCULATIONS
Using inches of water from the U-tube, refer to the following subsections to perform the
calculation of flow rate. Section 4.1 provides the equation used to compute the flow rate
at field conditions, and the "actual" flow rate, in cubic meters per minute. Actual flow
rate must be corrected to standard flow rate using the flow rate equation in Section 4.2.
The standard flow rate is then converted to standard cubic feet with the conversion
equation in Section 4.3.
White Mesa Mill - Standard Operating Procedures
Book #11, Environmental Protection Manual, Section I.I
Date: 2/07 Revision: DUSA-3
Page 4 of 6
4.1 Orifice Equation
Using the inches of water determined from the U-tube, the following equation is used to
calculated the flow rate at field conditions using:
Qa = a x (inches of water) b
Where
Qa = flow rate at field conditions, in cubic meters per minute (m3 / min).
a = orifice constant
b = orifice constant.
The constants a and b in the above equation are provided by the calibration laboratory for
each specific calibrated orifice (Attachment D). Each orifice will have unique
performance properties which relate to design and those measured performance properties
are incorporated into the flow equation as specific constants. The flow equation
demonstrates the relationship between measured vacuum pressure in inches of water to
actual flow rate utilizing this device.
4.2 Standard Conditions Flow Rate Equation
The flow rate at standard conditions is calculated by adjusting the field condition flow
rate, calculated above, by the following equation:
Ts = Absolute temperature at orifice calibration (298 K)
Ta = Absolute temperature at air sampler calibration (273°C + measured °C)
Ps = Atmospheric pressure at orifice calibration (760 mm Hg)
Pa = Atmospheric pressure at air sampler calibration (measured mm Hg)
Qs = Flow rate at standard conditions in cubic meters per minute (m3 / min).
Qa = Flow rate at field conditions in cubic meters per minute(m3 / min).
4.3 Correction Equation
To convert the standard flowrate, Qs, from cubic meters per minute to
standard cubic feet per minute, use the following equation:
Qs = Qa x [Pa x Tsl
[Ps x Ta]
where
per Minute = 35.341 x Qs
Orifice Calibration
Certification worksheets
+Photo
ENVIRONMENTAL
TLSCH ENVIROMENTAL, INC.
145 SOUTH MIAMI AVE.
VILLAGE OF CLEVES, OH 45002
513.467.9000
877.263.7610 TOLL FREE
513.467.9009 FAX
WWW.TISCH-ENV.COM
AIR POLLUTION MONITORING EQUIPMENT
ORIFICE TRANSFER STANDARD CERTIFICATION WORKSHEET TE-502 5A
Date - Jul 23, 2013 Rootsmeter S/N 043.3.211 Ta (K) - 299
Operator Tisch Orifice I.D. - t^8091779> Pa (mm) - 746.76
PLATE
OR
Run #
VOLUME
START
(m3)
VOLUME
STOP
(m3)
DIFF
VOLUME
(m3)
DIFF
TIME
(min)
METER
DIFF
Hg
(mm)
ORFICE
DIFF
H20
(in. )
1
2
3
4
5
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1.3820
0 . 9740
0 . 8730
0 . 8320
0.6860
3 . 3
6.4
8 . 0
8 . 9
13 . 0
2 .00
4 . 00
5 . 00
5 . 50
8 .00
DATA TABULATION
Vstd
(x axis)
Qstd
(y axis)
Va
(x axis)
Qa
(y axis)
0 . 9750
0.9708
0 . 9687
0.9676
0 . 9622
0.7055
0.9967
1.1096
1 .1630
1 .4027
1.3995
1.9792
2 .2128
2.3208
2.7990
0.9956
0.9913
0.9892
0.9881
0.9826
0.7204
1.0178
1.1331
1.1876
1.4323
0.8949
1.2655
1.4149
1.4840
1.7897
Qstd slope (m) = 2.00998
intercept (b) = -0.01958
coefficient (r) = 0.99997
Qa slope (m) = 1.25862
intercept (b) = -0.01252
coefficient (r) = 0.99997
y axis = SQRT[H20(Pa/760)(298/Ta)] y axis = SQRT [H20(Ta/Pa)]
CALCULATIONS
Vstd = Diff. Vol[(Pa-Diff. Hg)/760] (298/Ta)
Qstd = Vstd/Time
Va = Diff Vol [(Pa-Diff Hg)/Pa]
Qa = Va/Time
For subsequent flow rate calculations:
Qstd = l/m{ [SQRT(H2O(Pa/760) (298/Ta))]- b}
Qa = l/m{ [SQRT H20(Ta/Pa)]- b}
ENVIRONMENTAL
TLSCH ENVIROMENTAL, INC.
145 SOUTH MIAMI AVE.
VILLAGE OF CLEVES, OH 45002
513.467.9000
877.263.7610 TOLL FREE
513.467.9009 FAX
WWW.TISCH-ENV.COM
AIR POLLUTION MONITORING EQUIPMENT
ORIFICE TRANSFER STANDARD CERTIFICATION WORKSHEET TE-502 5A
Date - Aug 02, 2013 Rootsmeter S/N 0438320 Ta (K) - 298
Operator Tisch Orifice I.D. - 5-76-02 Pa (mm) - 751.84
PLATE
OR
Run #
VOLUME
START
(m3)
VOLUME
STOP
(m3)
DIFF
VOLUME
(m3)
DIFF
TIME
(min)
METER
DIFF
Hg
(mm)
ORFICE
DIFF
H20
(in. )
1
2
3
4
5
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1
1
1
1
1
00
00
00
00
00
1 .3910
0 . 9820
0 . 8810
0.8360
0.6900
3
6
8
8
13 . 0
2 . 00
4 .00
5 .00
5 . 50
8 .00
DATA TABULATION
Vstd
(x axis]
Qstd
(y axis)
Va
(x axis)
Qa
(y axis)
0.9849
0 . 9807
0 . 9786
0 . 9775
0 . 9721
0 . 7080
0 . 9987
1 .1108
1 . 1693
1 .4089
1.4066
1.9892
2 .2240
2 .3326
2.8132
0.9956
0.9914
0.9893
9882
9827
0.7157
0
0
1
1
1
1
0096
1229
1820
4242
0.8903
1.2591
1.4078
1.4765
1.7807
Qstd slope (m) = 2.00834
intercept (b) = -0.01431
coefficient (r) = 0.99994
Qa slope (m) = 1.25759
intercept (b) = -0.00906
coefficient (r) = 0.99994
y axis = SQRT[H20(Pa/760)(298/Ta)] y axis = SQRT[H20(Ta/Pa) ]
CALCULATIONS
Vstd = Diff. Vol[(Pa-Diff. Hg)/760] (298/Ta)
Qstd = Vstd/Time
Va = Diff Vol [(Pa-Diff Hg)/Pa]
Qa = Va/Time
For subsequent flow rate calculations:
Qstd = l/m{[SQRT(H2O(Pa/760)(298/Ta))]- b}
Qa = l/m{[SQRT H20(Ta/Pa)]- b}
Si m
.IMP
TISCH ,7
*• Mint Ave. CImn. OH am
www.tt»ch - inv.com
JeHUte Cal. Date:
MSI 779 July 23,2013
require recsJMofi
cn SEP1"* or »HMI« damaged
F i
Analytical laboratory
Certifications
I:
3^
CD w
I
O
CD
0 E
CD |
CO o
E co i_
CD
O
LL O
cz o t3 •8 CO c
0
o ^ •+-» ^-
CO CO
o
CO o
CO iC-
CO
o
0 c5 E O
> c
LU
0
CL co
CO
O
"O
0
-t—»
CO
o
CL o o c
Hi
.0
o
-»—'
CD
o
CO
-J
>» CO 1_
0 c
LLI
CO
_c o
X 00
o
0
CL c/>
CO
CO
CO
09
f *
Q> CO
5 co o
CD
CO
CM
c .o
•£3
£ -"5
o 8 jo
Tj O ig
•£ "*
.£ o cj
.« 5 ?
ill
"O "5 Q. g> g> g o e c
g o o
<*» *o
o o *
CO
CM
O
O
O
O
co
co
o
CM CN O O O O
.. -2 E
*r; «0 =J
5 5 z
c c a) 1 -2 X 2 | J
2 s- l
UJ LU O
-j ^
O .a X
Q JZ
D_
X
c -a B 3
3= LL. < JZ
D
a
I
CD
.c
§
•25
CD
s-
:Q
I
CD a cn .c §> c o
tfl
to
CO
8
CO c
o
c
CO a
iS
CO
3
5
CD
Sri
CO co
22 CD
o
0
CD
E
JS I
C/J Q
E co
o
CL o
o
CO
CO c
CD ^
O -Q
CD CD O ^
CO CO
O
CO
CD
"i—
o
TO
L-
o
CO
iS is
0 cB E O
S -«
W LLJ
o CD
CNJ
O
<*> Is-
O Tfr
DD CD
CNJ
O CO
o
CL
"D
CO -O f=
a: 2
£ CO
CO <F=
CO U
O <<t O CM
•f-8
CD CO
5
I
p
0 P o
iS to
|*
-55 CO fl>
•52 5 to
1 12.52 p
o o
CO CO
© 3-
O
o o
CO qj
CO
5-
Q ra
X
O Q CM
CM CM LJ- CD O CM O O
O O CO o o o .9 O O cfl — o CO CO rz ZJ ^ CL <
Si E 13
Li CD
or 55
•
C C CD I 2 IS z | |
CL. X CD
LU UJ O
1 I
QJ
C O .G CD
.Q. .o •5
s.
o> .c o c o
co
I
CO
§
•8
c
f
co
a
CO
!
co
Other Supporting
documentation
^/TCf(i_ f(L^C,-(-T^. CCe>te**$~- &Wir*V&*»d-3 I /tUy^^nru^
• 1 v
3 J Xa- J^-tJ-^
5
!!
i i : •
—ht-
WHITE MESA METEOROLOGICAL STATION
WEEKLY CHECKS
HARDWARE COMMENTS
SOLAR PANEL: GocX
fJATTERY CHARGE: 13
StATION CONDITION: £0J
SENSORS
WIND VANE: TXZH^
WIND SPEED: H &0£?
TOWER CABLES: Go*J
DATA MODULE: Pv^fvJl Bytes: ^ ZZ
DATA RETREIVAL
DATE: C/^/20H
LOCATION START: l1llC
^CATION END: /^H-S
Tco^FER OK (TECH INITIALS): Tt/
TIME OF DAY (MST): OS If