Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDRC-2021-018482 - 0901a06880f9b55a'lite Mountain 'lite Tribe Environmental Programs Department P.O. Box 448 Towaoc, Colorado 81334-0448 (970) 564-5430 Doug Hansen Director of Waste Management and Radiation Control State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality 195 North 1950 West P.O. Box 144880 Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4880 Div of WRsir4 Monagernent and KBCIIhil011 Conti'CA NOV 0 I 202? pi-3 c- 20 z ( - o 101-1-69z. Transmitted via email October, 28, 2021 Re: Increasing Levels of Groundwater Pollution at the White Mesa Uranium Mill Dear Mr. Hansen, We write again to express serious concerns over the continued degradation of the shallow groundwater at the White Mesa Uranium Mill ("Mill") operated by Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. ("EFRI") and the regulatory response of the Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control ("Division"). The Mill is located upgradient of the White Mesa Community of the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe ("Tribe"). Preservation and protection of the groundwater and seeps in and around White Mesa is a matter of extreme concern to the Tribe and its members. The Mill overlies the deep Navajo aquifer which is the source of drinking water for Tribe's White Mesa Community. The shallow Burro Canyon aquifer underlies White Mesa and is connected to surface water springs which are used by Tribal members and support native ecology and wildlife. Numerous monitoring wells in the compliance network at the Mill reveal accelerating concentrations of contamination exceeding groundwater contamination limits (GWCLs) specified in the Mill's groundwater discharge permit for rare elements and other analytes found in abundance in the Mill's processes and impoundments. Ongoing corrective actions by EFRI to address the chloroform contaminant plume and the nitrate/chloride contaminant plume have not achieved any significant reductions in the areal extent, concentrations, or contaminant masses of these plumes after several years of corrective action. Rather than requiring more effective corrective action to identify and control the sources of contamination to achieve compliance with GWCLs or requiring establishment of risk-based alternate compliance limits, the Division has responded to the continued exceedances of the Mill's GWCLs by repeatedly approving adjustment of background levels of contaminants and using a statistical method to reset GWCLs to more lenient compliance levels to bring the Mill into compliance without any risk-based assessment. g7(9 Recent data from Point of Compliance (POC) groundwater monitoring wells MW-30 and MW-31, located between two of the Mill's largest tailings impoundments — Cell 2 and Cell 3, illustrate the unchecked degradation of the Burro Canyon aquifer and the ineffectiveness of the Division's regulatory response. Nitrate, selenium and uranium are three of the most common contaminants associated with groundwater pollution at facilities associated with uranium tailings. In our region, Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act sites at Moab, Monticello, Tuba City, Durango, Naturita, Rifle, Slick Rock, Ambrosia Lake, Spook, Falls City and Shiprock have all produced contaminated groundwater plumes with elevated concentrations of Nitrate, Selenium and Uranium (DOE, 1996. DOE, 2009. DOE, 2010). POC wells MW-30 and MW-31 were drilled in 2005 between tailings impoundments 2 and 3. In a 2010 iteration of the Mill's GWD Permit, the Division first set GWCLs for MW-30 and MW-31. Recent data from POC well MW-30 shows elevated and increasing levels of nitrate, selenium and uranium (EFRI, 2021). Despite the Division's repeated relaxation of GWCLs, compliance exceedances continue unabated. The progression of relaxed GWCLs for Se and U in MW-30 and recent exceedances are as follows: Parameter Groundwater Quality Standard 20Jan2010 modified GWDP GWCL 2012 Renewal GWDP GWCL 2018 Renewal GWDP GWCL 2021 modified GWDP 1stQtr2021 Exceedances 2nd Qtr2021 Exceedances Selenium 50 p.g/L 34 pg/L 34 pg/L 47.2 pg/L 53.6 ug/L 55.6, 55.3, 55.7, 58.3, 56.3 pg/L 54.1 pg/L Uranium 30 µg/L 8.32 p.g/L 8.32 µg/L 8.32 p.g/L 9.82 pg/L 9.86, 11.6, 10.3, 10.7, 10.2pg/L 9.84 µg/L In March of 2021, the Division relaxed the GWCL for Se in MW-30 and allowed it to exceed Utah's health-based groundwater quality standard of 50 µg/L, contrary to groundwater protection rules stating compliance limits shall not be raised above health-based quality standards. The Division set the modified GWCLs based on the highest historical value of data points since October 2012, without any risk-based assessment of impacts to human health and the environment or consideration of future beneficial uses of the aquifer. The Mill exceeded the modified GWCLs for Se and U in MW-30 even before they became effective. The Mill is exceeding its groundwater compliance limits faster than the Division can relax them. Adjacent monitoring POC well MW-31 also shows rising trends of indicator parameters including selenium, sulfate, nitrate, chloride, total dissolved solids, and uranium. In a Source Assessment Report (SAR) dated April 29, 2021, for uranium in MW-31, EFRI proposed to increase the GWCL for U in MW-31 from 15 to 29.3 pg/L, just under the health- based Utah Groundwater Quality Standard of 30 ug/L, and in July of 2021, the Division wrote EFRI a letter stating the uranium GWCL would be reset from 15 to 29.3 p.g/L as requested. Prior to the latest April 29, 2021 SAR, MW-31 was the subject of four well-specific SAR's (after submission of a sitewide 2012 SAR SAR Date Monitoring Constituents 8/30/2013 Se 12/19/2015 Se, SO4, TDS, pH 8/20/2017 Se, SO4, TDS, U 6/24/2020 SO4, TDS Each SAR completed at the site has concluded that the Mill is not responsible for increasing levels of pollution and recommend that compliance limits be increased. This strategy is clearly not working from a groundwater protection and health and safety risk assessment viewpoint. The multiple lines of evidence EFRI and UDWMRC cite to base the assessment that the Mill is not at fault for the rapidly increasing pollution do not stand up to scrutiny. During the groundwater discharge permit renewal process, the Tribe commented that the pumping wells associated with the corrective action plans for the chloroform and nitrate plumes may be drawing groundwater pollution from the tailings cell region to the east side of the site where there is a gap in the POC well network and a risk of not detecting groundwater pollution from the Mill facilities. We requested that chloroform monitoring well TW4-24, located in that area, be tested for the full suite of 38 indicator parameters listed in the groundwater discharge permit for the POC wells. The Division concurred and mandated testing of TW4-24. Results from this sampling revealed uranium concentrations in TW-24 close to a milligram per liter (776 ug/L, 04/08/2020) - approximately 25 times the ground water quality standard of 30 ug/L. TW4-24 also shows high levels of selenium, nitrate, chloride and other indicator parameters, indicating it is likely part of the same contaminant plume affecting MW-30 and MW-31 and to an unknown extent, the eastern portion of the Mill site. The Division's regulatory approach of resetting background and using a statistical approach of relaxing GWCLs to avoid noncompliance and corrective action, is clearly inconsistent with the letter and intent of the Utah Groundwater Protection Program, because it fails to ensure, or even take into consideration whether groundwater protection levels are being protected and residual contaminant levels are protective of human health and the environment. We urge the Division to consider MW-31, MW-30 and TW4-24 together and the rising concentrations of chloride, selenium, sulfate, uranium collectively as evidence that there is an un-natural continuing source of contamination that SAR's completed to date have been unsuccessful in identifying and the current CAPs are insufficient in remedying. Before approving any further relaxations of GWCLs, it is time for the source(s) of the continuing contamination to be conclusively determined with an updated comprehensive isotopic test of groundwater conditions at each POC well along with a selection of wells from the general monitoring wells and the TW4 and TWN series wells. Sincerely, 10. Z.,r. 2.-1 Colin Larrick Water Quality Program Manager Ute Mountain Ute Tribe c: Kim Shelly, Executive Director of Utah Departrnent of Environmental Quality Erica Gaddis, Director, Utah Water Quality Division Ronnie Nieves, Environmental Health Director, San Juan Public Health Department Russell Seeley, UDEQ District Engineer Kimberly Varilek, Chief, Tribal Affairs Branch, Environmental Protection Agency Treasure Bailley, Geologist, Environmental Protection Agency References Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. May, 2021. 1st Quarter 2021 Groundwater Monitoring Report Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit UGW370004 White Mesa Uranium Mill U.S. Department of Energy. October, 1996. Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action Ground Water Project. Volume 1. Grand Junction Projects Office. U.S. Department of Energy. April, 2010. Moab UMTRA Project, January 2010 Validation Data Package for the Routine Ground Water and Surface Water Sampling Event. U.S. Department of Energy. December, 2009. Monticello Mill Tailings Site Operable Unit III Water Quality Compliance Strategy. g/(9