DRC-2010-004484 - 0901a068801b6411

DRC- 2,0 10-004484
DENISO
MINES
Oenbon Miiies (USA) Corp.
1050 17th Streot, Suite 9S0
Denver, CO 8026S
USA
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]S
www.denisonmlnes.coni
August 4, 2010
VIA PDF AND FEDERAL EXPRESS
Rusty Lundberg, Co-Executive Secretary
Utah Water Quality Board
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144810
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4810
Re: State of Utah Ground Water Discharge Permit No. UGW370004 White Mesa
Uranium Mill - Notice Pursuant to Part I.E.10(3) of the Permit, Utah Radioactive
Materials License No. UT1900479, and Utah Administrative Code ("UAC") R317-6-
6.16(C)(1)
Dear Mr. Lundberg:
Please take notice pursuant to Part I.G.3 of the White Mesa Mill's (the "Mill's") State of Utah
Groundwater Discharge Permit No. UGW370004 (the "GWDP") and Utah Administrative Code
("UAC") R317-6-6.16(C)(1) that Denison Mines (USA) Corp., ("Denison") as operator of the
Mill and holder of the GWDP, failed to meet the standards in Part I.E. 10(3) of the GWDP by not
utilizing a Utah certified laboratory for analysis of semi-volatile organic compounds ("SVOCs")
during the August 2009 tailings wastewater sampling event.
Denison has, on an ongoing basis, been increasing the thoroughness of quality assurance/quality
control ("QA/QC") management oversight over all environmental sampling programs. A
component of the current oversight program includes a corporate QA/QC manager's review,
prior to each type of field sampling event, of applicable plans and QA/QC requirements, existing
field procedures and instructions, applicable reporting requirements, and previously submitted
reporting documents. This review is conducted in sufficient time to modify any field, laboratory,
or reporting procedures before the next sampling event begins.
During the internal quality assurance/quality control review which identified the above failure,
Denison also identified an error in the formula used to calculate % RPDs for the analyte results
in the duplicate sample pair collected during the above-mentioned 2009 tailings wastewater
sampling event. Both the original, erroneous, calculations and corrected calculations identified
the same six analytes whose duplicates exceeded the EPA quality guideline of 20% RPD as
incorporated in Section 3-1 of the Mill's Quality Assurance Plan. That is, the correction
identified no new pairs of analytes that exceeded the guideline. The six exceedances of the 20%
RPD have already been reported in the November 2009 Tailings Cell Wastewater Sampling
Report.
1. Facts and Background Information
a) Part I.E. 10(3) of the GWDP requires that all laboratory analyses for the tailings cell
wastewater quality monitoring program be conducted by a Utah certified laboratory.
According to Part I.E. 10(3), this requirement has been incorporated into Section (5) of
the Mill's approved Tailings and Slimes Drain Sampling Program plan document.
b) Section 1.G.3 of the Mill's GWDP requires that in the event that the Permittee fails to
maintain DMT or BAT or otherwise fails to meet DMT or BAT standards as required
by the GWDP, the Permittee shall submit to the Executive Secretary a notification and
description of the failure according to R317-6-6.16(C)(1). Notification shall be given
orally within 24- hours of the Permittee's discovery of the failure of DMT or BAT, and
shall be followed up by written notification, including the information necessary to
make a determination under R317-6-6.16(C)(2), within five calendar days of the
Permittee's discovery of the failure of best available technology.
c) In preparation for the August 2010 tailings sampling event, which occurred on august 3,
2010, Denison conducted a QA/QC management review of the Tailings and Slimes
Drain Sampling Plan, the GWDP, the Radioactive Materials License and the previously
submitted 2009 Annual Tailings Cells Wastewater Sampling Report (the "2009
Tailings Report").
d) During a review of analytical requirements and laboratory certifications, in preparation
for the August 2010 tailings wastewater sampling event, it was identified that the 2009
Tailings Report utilized results from an analytical laboratory, Energy Laboratories
("EL"), which does not have a Utah certification for the analysis of semi-volatile
organic compounds ("SVOCs").
e) At the time of the 2009 tailings wastewater sampling event, EL did have current
certifications for all other analyses which it performed and reported in the 2009
Tailings Report — specifically, the analytes in Table 2 of the GWDP, plus chloride,
sulfate, carbonate, sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium, total anions and cations.
DENISO
MINES
f) During the same pre-activity review in preparation for the 2010 tailings sampling event,
the corporate QA/QC manager reviewed the % RPD calculations and other elements of
the initial 2009 Tailings Report. The % RPD evaluation tests the analytical
laboratory's precision by comparing its analytical results for a field sample and its field
duplicate. It was identified that the % RPD calculation spreadsheets used to generate
Table 1 of the 2009 Tailings Report had an inadvertent formula error resulting in lower
values for the % RPDs than would have been generated by a correct formula.
g) Correction of the Table 1 formula resulted in no additional analytes having RPD values
out of compliance. Both the original, erroneous, calculations and corrected
calculations identified the same six analytes as having duplicates exceeding the EPA
quality guideline of 20% RPD. That is, the correction identified no new pairs of
analytes that exceeded the guideline. The six exceedances of the 20% RPD have
already been reported in the November 2009 Tailings Cell Wastewater Sampling
Report.
2. Actions Taken
Laboratory Certification
Upon identification of EL's lack of certification for SVOCs, the corporate QA/QC manager
contacted the Mill to ascertain why EL's lack of certification had not been identified during the
2009 tailings program, and to clarify which analytical labs were assigned to each analysis for the
2010 tailings program. The following plan of action was immediately put into place:
a) The Mill was instructed to terminate the order with EL for SVOC analysis of samples
for the upcoming tailings sampling event in August 2010.
b) America West Analytical Laboratories ("AWAL"), a Utah-certified laboratory for
SVOC analysis, was contracted for analysis of the SVOC samples from the upcoming
tailings sampling event in August 2010.
c) The Mill was instructed not to use any SVOC sample containers that may have been
received from EL to date, and to request appropriate comparable containers from
AWAL.
DENISO
MINES
RPD Error
Upon identification of the spreadsheet error affecting the %iRPD calculation, the %RPD's were
recalculated using the correct formula, and Table 1 of the 2009 Tailings Report was revised. The
revised Table 1 has been provided as Attachment 1 to this letter. For ease of comparison, both
the previously reported and corrected values have been included in the table. The six analytes
which were already reported as exceeding the 20% RPD limit in the 2009 Tailings Report, and
which remain the only parameters to exceed the limit in the revised calculations, are highlighted
in color and bold italics in the revised table.
3. Actions That Will be Taken to Prevent a Reoccurrence of this Incident
Laboratory Certification
The following actions will be taken to prevent a reoccurrence of this incident:
a) The Mill has been instructed that laboratories to be used for each sampling program are
to be confirmed with the corporate QA/QC manager before ordering analyses from the
lab.
b) The corporate QA/QC manager performs and records annual checks of which
laboratories have current Utah certifications for each type of analyte required in each
sampling program.
It should be noted that Denison's current QA/QC management reviews were put in place for the
very purpose of identifying past occurrences and preventing fijture occurrences of similar
unintentional planning errors. The fact that the certification deficiency was identified early
enough to implement a correction during the planning stage of the 2010 tailings sampling
program and before the 2010 tailings sampling event occurred, provides evidence that the
expanded management oversight is working as intended.
RPD Error
As mentioned above, upon identification of the spreadsheet error affecting the %RPD
calculation, the %RPD's formula was corrected. A template based on the corrected formula has
already been developed for use in preparation of the 2010 Tailings Report.
DENISO
MINES
4. Root Cause Analysis
Laboratory Certification
The corporate QA/QC manager investigated the certification issue with the Mill staff, and EL
management. The root cause was determined to be as follows:
From the Mill's initial startup through 2008, no analysis of tailings composition was required by
the Mill's Radioactive Materials License or GWDP. Any tailings characterization sampling up
until that time was performed voluntarily by the Mill and not required to be reported to the Utah
Department of Environmental Quality ("DEQ"). Any analyses of tailings samples collected
voluntarily for in-house use from approximately the mid-1990's through 2008 were performed
by EL.
The Summer 2009 tailings and slimes drain sampling event was the first time tailings data was to
be reported to DEQ and the first time the GWDP and sampling plan requirements for a Utah-
certified laboratory were applied to this program. The root cause of the non-compliance was that
Mill personnel erroneously assumed EL was certified for SVOCs, since they had been used in
the past for informal SVOC analysis of tailings samples and are certified for other analyses
required for the tailings program. The QA/QC management review identified that the
assumption was incorrect.
RPD Error
The RPD error resulted from an inadvertent formula error introduced when the QA/QC
requirements were first applied to the tailings sampling program and the initial spreadsheets were
developed for the initial Summer 2009 tailings sampling event and 2009 Tailings Report.
5. Affirmative Defense
Failure to use a Utah certified laboratory for SVOC analysis in connection with the 2009
sampHng event was a violation of Part l.E.10.d.(3) of the GWDP. Failure to use the correct
%RPD formula would be a violation of Section 3.1 of the Quality Assurance Plan, and therefore
of Part l.e.l0.d.(6) of the GWDP, however, the correct formula would not have changed the
conclusions regarding % RPD in the 2009 Tailings Report. Hence, Denison asserts that the
affirmative defense in Part I.G.3.C) of the Permit should be applicable to this incident, for the
following reasons:
DENISO
MINES
a) Notification
By virtue of the initial oral notification given to DEQ personnel on Monday, August 2, 2010 and
this written notice, Denison has submitted notification according to UAC R317-6-6.13.
b) Failure was not Intentional or Caused by the Permittee's Negligence
The use of an uncertified laboratory was not intentional or caused by Denison's negligence,
either in action or in failure to act. The Mill inadvertently used an uncertified laboratory due to
1) inexperience - the 2009 tailings sampling event was the first time in the Mill's history that a
certified laboratory was required for SVOCs, and 2) inadvertence - the Mill assumed
certification had been confirmed for the SVOC analytes due to the history of using EL for
informal SVOC analysis of tailings samples and the fact that EL is certified for other anlaysis of
Mill samples. The %R?D in the initial Tailings Report was incorrect due to an unintentional
calculation or keystroke error in a spreadsheet table.
c) The Permittee has Taken Adequate Measures to Meet Permit Conditions
Denison has taken adequate measures to meet Permit conditions in a timely manner. The
changes to a certified laboratory have already been implemented, and the corrections to the
%oRPD calculations have already been implemented;
d) The Provisions of UCA 19-5-107 Have Not Been Violated
The provisions of Utah Code 19-5-107 have not been violated. There has been no discharge of a
pollutant into waters of the state. Denison has not caused pollution which constitutes a menace
to public health and welfare, or is harmful to wildlife, fish or aquatic life, or impairs domestic,
agricultural, industrial, recreational, or other beneficial uses of water, nor has Denison placed or
caused to be placed any waste in a location where there is probable cause to believe it will cause
pollution.
Please contact the undersigned if you have any questions or require any frirther information.
Yours truly,
Jo Ann Tischler
Director, Compliance and Permitting
DENISO
MINES
David C, Frydenlund
Ron F. Hochstein
Ryan Palmer
Harold R. Roberts
David E. Turk
DE*SOJ'/I
,WNES
ATTACHMENT 1
Revised Table I
Duplicate RPD Analysis
Revised Table I
Analysis of Duplicate Sample
Constituent Cell 4A
Duplicate of
Cell 4A
% RPD Reported
in November
2009
Corrected o/o
RPD
Carbonate ND ND NA NA
Bicarbonate NI)ND NA NA
Calcium 627 618 0.96 I.45
Chloride 4650 4r30 7.74 11.85
Fluoride 0.3 0.3 0 0
Magnesium 3250 3270 0.41 0.61
Nitrogen -Ammonia 3140 3250 2.3r 3.44
Nitrogen - Nitrate 28 26 4.88 7.4r
Potassium 980 984 0.27 0.4r
Sodium 5980 60s0 0.78 1.16
Sulfate 67 600 62100 5.5 8 8.48
Lab pH t.4 1.38 0.96 r.44
TDS 81400 82s00 0.9 r.34
Arsenic 62600 62220 0.41 0.61
Beryllium 296 321 5.48 8.10
Cadmium r920 1910 0.35 0.52
Chromium 3220 5640 40.07 54.63
Cobalt 9440 1 8500 48.48 64.85
Copper 99200 I 06000 4.47 6.63
Iron 236000 245000 4.96 3.7 4
Lead s360 5390 0.37 0.56
Manganese I 78000 I 89000 4.04 5.99
Mercury 1.19 1.11 4.5 8 6.96
Molybdenum 24300 24300 0 0
Nickel 17100 17 400 1.16 r.7 4
Selenium 4620 4590 0.43 0.65
Silver 78 82 3.36 5
Thallium r62 t62 0 0
Tin 257 258 0.26 0.39
Uranium 1 1 8000 1 I 8000 0 0
Vanadium 9 I 8000 987000 4.89 7.24
Zinc r42000 151000 4.14 6.r4
Gross Alpha 8910 9130 1.63 2.44
Acetone 60 110 43,48 58.82
Benzene NI)ND NA NA
Carbon tetrachloride ND ND NA NA
Chloroform 4 7.r 41.06 55,86
Chloromethane 3.4 6.5 46,62 62.63
MEK ND NI)NA NA
Methylene Chloride ND ND NA NA
Naphthalene 1.8 3 36.36 50.00
Tetrahydrofuran ND ND NA NA
Toluene ND ND NA NA
Xylenes ND ND NA NA
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 1 of 51

WHITE MESA MILL TAILINGS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
AND
DISCHARGE MINIMIZATION TECHNOLOGY (DMT)
MONITORING PLAN

1. INTRODUCTION
This Tailings Management System and Discharge Minimization Technology Monitoring Plan (the
“Plan”) for the White Mesa Mill (the “Mill”) provides procedures for monitoring of the tailings cell
system as required under State of Utah Radioactive Materials License No. UT1900479 (the
“Radioactive Materials License”), as well as procedures for operating and maintenance of monitoring
equipment and reporting procedures that are adequate to demonstrate DMT compliance under State
of Utah Ground Water Discharge Permit No. 370004 for the Mill (the “GWDP”).
This Plan is designed as a systematic program for constant surveillance and documentation of the
integrity of the tailings impoundment system including dike stability, liner integrity, and transport systems, as well as monitoring of water levels in Roberts Pond and feedstock storage areas at the
Mill. The Plan requires daily, weekly, quarterly, monthly and annual inspections and evaluations and monthly reporting to Mill management.
2. DAILY TAILINGS INSPECTIONS
The following daily tailings inspections shall be performed:

2.1. Daily Comprehensive Tailings Inspection

On a daily basis, including weekends, all areas connected with the four tailings cells will be
inspected. Observations will be made of the current condition of each cell, noting any corrective
action that needs to be taken.

The Environmental or Radiation Technician is responsible for performing the daily tailings inspections, except on weekends when the Shift Foreman will perform the weekend tailings
inspections. The Radiation Safety Officer may designate other individuals with training, as described in Section 2.4 below, to perform the daily tailings inspection.
Observations made by the inspector will be recorded on the Daily Inspection Data form (a copy of
which is attached in Appendix A). The Daily Inspection Data form contains an inspection checklist,
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 2 of 51
which includes a tailings cells map, and spaces to record observations, especially those of immediate
concern and those requiring corrective action. The inspector will place a check by all inspection items that appear to be operating properly. Those items where conditions of potential concern are
observed should be marked with an "X". A note should accompany the "X" specifying what the concern is and what corrective measures will resolve the problem. This observation of concern
should be noted on the form until the problem has been remedied. The date that corrective action was taken should be noted as well.

Areas to be inspected include the following: Cell 1, 2, 3, and 4A, Dikes 1, 2, 3, 4A-S, and 4A-W,
wind movement of tailings, effectiveness of dust minimization methods, spray evaporation, Cell 2
spillway, Cell 3 spillway, Cell 3 and 4A liquid pools and associated liquid return equipment, cell
leak detection systems, and the wildlife ponds.
Operational features of the tailings area are checked for conditions of potential concern. The
following items require visual inspection during the daily tailings inspection:
a) Tailings slurry and SX raffinate transport systems from the Mill to the active disposal cell(s), and pool return pipeline and pumps.
Daily inspections of the tailings lines are required to be performed when the Mill
is operating. The lines to be inspected include the: tailings slurry lines from CCD to the active tailings cell; SX raffinate lines that can discharge into Cell 1, Cell 3
or Cell 4A; the pond return line from the tailings area to the Mill; and, lines transporting pond solutions from one cell to another.

b) Cell 1.

c) Cell 2.

d) Cell 3.
e) Cell 4A.
f) Dike structures including dikes 1, 2, 3, 4A-S, and 4A-W.
g) The Cell 2 spillway, Cell 3 spillway, Cell 3 and Cell 4A liquid pools and associated liquid return equipment.
h) Presence of wildlife and/or domesticated animals in the tailings area, including
waterfowl and burrowing animal habitations.

i) Spray evaporation pumps and lines.
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 3 of 51

j) Wind movement of tailings and dust minimization.
Wind movement of tailings will be evaluated for conditions which may require initiation of preventative dust minimization measures for cells containing tailings
sand. During tailings inspection, general surface conditions will be evaluated for the following: 1) areas of tailings subject to blowing and/or wind movement, 2)
liquid pool size, 3) areas not subject to blowing and/or wind movement,
expressed as a percentage of the total cell area. The evaluations will be reviewed
on a weekly basis, or more frequently if warranted, and will be used to direct dust
minimization activities.

k) Observation of flow and operational status of the dust control/spray evaporation system(s).
l) Observations of any abnormal variations in tailings pond elevations in Cells 1, 3,
and 4A.
m) Locations of slurry and SX discharge within the active cells. Slurry and SX discharge points need to be indicated on the tailings cells map included in the
Daily Inspection Data form.
n) An estimate of flow for active tailings slurry and SX line(s).
o) An estimate of flow in the solution return line(s).

p) Daily measurements in the leak detection system (LDS) sumps of the tailings
cells will be made when warranted by changes in the solution level of the
respective leak detection system.
The trigger for further action when evaluating the measurements in the Cell 1 and
Cell 3 leak detection systems is a gain of more than 12 inches in 24 hours. The solution level in Cell 4A leak detection is not allowed to be more than 1.0 foot
above the lowest point on the bottom flexible membrane liner (elevation 5556.14 feet amsl). If any of these observations are made, the Mill Manager should be
notified immediately and the leak detection system pump started. In addition, the requirement to notify the Executive Secretary in accordance with Parts I.D.6 and
I.G.3 of the Groundwater Discharge Permit must be adhered to when the solution level trigger for Cell 4A has been exceeded.
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 4 of 51

Whenever the leak detection system pump is operating and the flow meter totalizer is recording, a notation of the date and the time will be recorded on the
Daily Inspection Data form. This data will be used in accordance with License Condition 11.3.B through 11.3.E of the Mill’s Radioactive Materials License, to
determine whether or not the flow rate into the leak detection system is in excess of the License Conditions.

q) An estimate of the percentage of the tailings beach surface area and solution pool
area is made, including estimates of solutions, cover areas, and tailings sands for
Cells 3 and 4A.

Items (a), (m), (n), and (o) are to be done only when the Mill is operating. When the Mill is down, these items cannot be performed.
2.2. Daily Operations Inspection
During Mill operation, the Shift Foreman, or other person with the training specified in Section 2.4
below, designated by the Radiation Safety Officer, will perform an inspection of the tailings line and tailings area at least once per shift, paying close attention for potential leaks and to the discharges
from the pipelines. Observations by the Inspector will be recorded on the appropriate line on the Operating Foreman’s Daily Inspection form.
2.3. Daily Operations Patrol

In addition to the inspections described in Sections 2.1 and 2.2 above, a Mill employee will patrol
the tailings area at least twice per shift during Mill operations to ensure that there are no obvious
safety or operational issues, such as leaking pipes or unusual wildlife activity or incidences.

No record of these patrols need be made, but the inspectors will notify the Radiation Safety Officer and/or Mill management in the event that during their inspection they discover that an abnormal
condition or tailings emergency has occurred.
2.4. Training
All individuals performing inspections described in Sections 2.1 and 2.2 above must have Tailings Management System training as set out in the Tailings Inspection Training procedure, which is
attached as Appendix B. This training will include a training pack explaining the procedure for performing the inspection and addressing inspection items to be observed. In addition, each
individual, after reviewing the training pack, will sign a certification form, indicating that training
has been received relative to his/her duties as an inspector.

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 5 of 51
2.5. Tailings Emergencies
Inspectors will notify the Radiation Safety Officer and/or Mill management immediately if, during
their inspection, they discover that an abnormal condition exists or an event has occurred that could cause a tailings emergency. Until relieved by the Environmental or Radiation Technician or
Radiation Safety Officer, inspectors will have the authority to direct resources during tailings emergencies.

Any major catastrophic events or conditions pertaining to the tailings area should be reported
immediately to the Mill Manager or the Radiation Safety Officer, one of whom will notify Corporate
Management. If dam failure occurs, notify your supervisor and the Mill Manager immediately. The
Mill Manager will then notify Corporate Management, MSHA (303-231-5465), and the State of
Utah, Division of Dam Safety (801-538-7200).
3. WEEKLY TAILINGS AND DMT INSPECTION
3.1. Weekly Tailings Inspections
Weekly tailings inspections are to be conducted by the Radiation Safety Department and include the following:
a) Leak Detection Systems
Each tailings cell's leak detection system shall be checked weekly to determine
whether it is wet or dry. If marked wet, the liquid levels need to be measured and
reported. In Cell 1 and Cell 3 the leak detection system is measured by use of a
pipe that is removed from the system which will indicate the presence of
solutions in the LDS system. The Cell 4A leak detection system is monitored on
a continuous basis by use of a pressure transducer that feeds water level
information to an electronic data collector. The pressure transducer is calibrated for fluid with a specific gravity of 1.0. The water levels are measured every hour
and the information is stored for later retrieval. The water levels are measured to the nearest 0.10 inch. The data collector is currently programmed to store 7 days
of water level information. The number of days of stored data can be increased beyond 7 days if needed. The water level data is downloaded to a laptop
computer on a weekly basis and incorporated into the Mill’s environmental monitoring data base, and into the files for weekly inspection reports of the
tailings cell leak detection systems
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 6 of 51

If sufficient fluid is present in the leak detection system of any cell, the fluid shall be pumped from the LDS, to the extent reasonably possible, and record the
volume of fluid recovered. Any fluid pumped from an LDA shall be returned to a disposal cell.
If fluid is pumped from an LDS, the flow rate shall be calculated by dividing the
recorded volume of fluid recovered by the elapsed time since fluid was last
pumped or increases in the LDS fluid levels were recorded, whichever is the
more recent. This calculation shall be documented as part of the weekly
inspection.

Upon the initial pumping of fluid from an LDS, a fluid sample shall be collected and analyzed in accordance with paragraph 11.3 C. of the Radioactive Materials
License.
For Cell 4A, under no circumstance shall fluid head in the leak detection system sump exceed a 1-foot level above the lowest point in the lower flexible
membrane liner. To determine the Maximum Allowable Daily LDS Flow
Rates in the Cell 4A leak detection system, the total volume of all fluids
pumped from the LDS on a weekly basis shall be recovered from the data
collector, and that information will be used to calculate an average volume
pumped per day. Under no circumstances shall the daily LDS flow volume
exceed 24,160 gallons/day. The maximum daily LDS flow volume will be
compared against the measured cell solution levels detailed on Table 1 in
Appendix E, to determine the maximum daily allowable LDS flow volume for varying head conditions in Cell 4A.

b) Slimes Drain Water Level Monitoring
(i) Cell 3 is an active tailings cell while Cell 2 is partially reclaimed with approximately 90% of the surface covered by platform fill. Each cell has a slimes drain system
which aids in dewatering the slimes and sands placed in the cell; (ii) Cell 2 has a pump placed inside of the slimes drain access pipe at the bottom of the
slimes drain. As taken from actual measurements, the bottom of the slimes drain is
38 feet below a water level measuring point at the centerline of the slimes drain
access pipe, at the ground surface level. This means that the bottom of the slimes
drain pool and the location of the pump are one foot above the lowest point of the
FML in Cell 2, which, based on construction reports, is at a depth of 39 feet below
the water level measuring point on the slimes drain access pipe for Cell 2;
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 7 of 51
(iii)The slimes drain pump in Cell 2 is on a timed system, under which it pumps for 15
minutes each hour, thereby allowing the slimes wastewater to recharge for 45 minutes before being pumped again. Based on measurements taken in August 2006,
the water level in the Cell 2 slimes drain recharges to a depth of about 28.50 feet before each pumping and is pumped to a depth of 38 feet after each pumping, in each
case measured below the water level measuring point on the slimes drain access pipeactivated and deactivated by a float mechanism and water level probe system.
When the water level reaches the level of the float mechanism the pump is activated.
Pumping then occurs until the water level reaches the lower probe which turns the
pump off. The lower probe is located one foot above the bottom of the slimes drain
standpipe, and the float valve is located at five feet above the bottom of the slimes
drain standpipe. The average wastewater head in the Cell 2 slimes drain is therefore
about less than 5 feet. The depth to water of about 28.50 feet after rechargeand is below the phreatic surface of tailings Cell 2, which is at a depth of about 20 feet
below the water level measuring point on the slimes drain access pipe. As a result, there is a continuous flow of wastewater from Cell 2 into the slimes drain collection
system. Mill management considers that the average allowable wastewater head in the Cell 2 slimes drain resulting from pumping at these intervalsin this manner is
satisfactory and is as low as reasonably achievable. Based on past experience, cycling the pump more than 15 minutes every hour can result in more replacement
costs for pumps and more resulting system downtime; (iv) The Cell 2 slimes drain pump is checked weekly to observe that it is operating and
that the timer is setwater level probe and float mechanism are working properly,
which is noted on the Weekly Tailings Inspection Form. If at any time the pump is
observed to be not working properly, it will be fixed or replaced within 15 days;
(v) Depth to wastewater in the Cell 2 slimes drain access pipe shall be monitored and
recorded weekly to determine maximum and minimum fluid head before and after a
pumping cycle, respectively. All head measurements must be made from the same
measuring point (the notch at the north side of the access pipe), and made to the
nearest 0.01 foot. The results will be recorded as depth-in-pipe measurements on the Weekly Tailings Inspection Form;
(vi) On a monthly basis, the slimes drain pump will be turned off and the wastewater in the slimes drain access pipe will be allowed to stabilize for at least 90 hours. Once
the water level has stabilized (based on no change in water level for three (3) successive readings taken no less than one (1) hour apart) the water level of the
wastewater will be measured and recorded as a depth-in-pipe measurement on the Monthly Inspection Data form, by measuring the depth to water below the water level
measuring point on the slimes drain access pipe; (vii) No process liquids shall be allowed to be discharged into Cell 2;
(viii) If at any time the most recent average annual head in the Cell 2 slimes drain is
found to have increased above the average head for the previous calendar year, the
Licensee will comply with the requirements of Part I.G.3 of the GWDP, including the
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 8 of 51
requirement to provide notification to the Executive Secretary orally within 24 hours
followed by written notification; (ix) Because Cell 3 and Cell 4A are currently active, no pumping from the Cell 3 or Cell
4A slimes drain is authorized. Prior to initiation of tailings dewatering operations for Cell 3 or Cell 4A, a similar procedure will be developed for ensuring that average
head elevations in the Cell 3 and Cell 4A slimes drains are kept as low as reasonably achievable, and that the Cell 3 and Cell 4A slimes drains are inspected and the results
reported in accordance with the requirements of the permit.”
c) Wind Movement of Tailings

An evaluation of wind movement of tailings or dusting and control measures
shall be taken if needed.
d) Tailings Wastewater Pool Elevation Monitoring
Solution elevation measurements in Cells 1, 3 and 4A and Roberts Pond are to be taken by survey on a weekly basis, and the beac area in Cell 4A with the maximum elevation is to be
taken by survey on a monthly basis, as follows:
(i) The survey will be performed by the Mill’s Radiation Safety Officer or designee (the “Surveyor”) with the assistance of another Mill worker (the “Assistant”);
(ii) The survey will be performed using a survey instrument (the “Survey Instrument”) accurate to 0.01 feet, such as a Sokkai No. B21, or equivalent, together with a
survey rod (the “Survey Rod”) having a visible scale in 0.01 foot increments;
(iii)The reference Points (the “Reference Points”) for Cells 1, 3 and 4A, and Roberts
Pond are known points established by professional survey. For Cell 1 and Roberts
Pond, the Reference Point is a wooden stake with a metal disk on it located on the
southeast corner of Cell 1. The elevation of the metal disk (the “Reference Point
Elevation”) for Cell 1 and Roberts Pond is at 5,623.14 feet above mean sea level (“FMSL”). For Cell 3 and cell 4A, the Reference Point is a piece of metal rebar
located on the south dike of Cell 3. The elevation at the top of this piece of rebar (the Reference Point Elevation for Cell 3 and cell 4A) is at 5,607.83 FMSL;
(iv) The Surveyor will set up the Survey Instrument in a location where both the applicable Reference Point and pond surface are visible. For Cell 1 and Roberts
Pond, this is typically on the road on the Cell 1 south dike between Cell 1 and Roberts Pond, approximately 100 feet east of the Cell 1/Roberts Pond Reference
Point. For Cell 3 and Cell 4A, this is typically on the road on the Cell 3 dike approximately 100 feet east of the Cell 3 Reference Point;
(v) Once in location, the Surveyor will ensure that the Survey Instrument is level by
centering the bubble in the level gauge on the Survey Instrument;
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 9 of 51
(vi) The Assistant will place the Survey Rod vertically on the Reference Point (on the
metal disk on the Cell 1/Roberts Pond Reference Point and on the top of the rebar on the Cell 3 and cell 4A Reference Point. The Assistant will ensure that the
Survey Rod is vertical by gently rocking the rod back and forth until the Surveyor has established a level reading;
(vii) The Surveyor will focus the cross hairs of the Survey Instrument on the scale on the Survey Rod, and record the number (the “Reference Point Reading”), which
represents the number of feet the Survey Instrument is reading above the
Reference Point;
(viii) The Assistant will then move to a designated location where the Survey Rod can
be placed on the surface of the main solution pond in the Cell 1, Cell 4A or
Roberts Pond, or the area of the beach in Cell 4A with the highest elevation, as the
case may be. These designated locations, and the methods to be used by the Assistant to consistently use the same locations are as follows:
A. Pond Surface Measurements
I. Cell 3
A stake has been place in the central area of the south dike of Cell 3. The Assistant will walk perpendicular to the dike from the stake to the nearest point
on the liquid surface of Cell 3 and place the Survey Rod at that location;
I. Cell 4A
B. Cell 4A

The Assistant will walk down the slope in the northeast corner of Cell 4A and
place the Survey Rod at the liquid level.

II. Cell 1
C. Cell 1
A mark has been painted on the north side of the ramp going to the pump platform in Cell 1. The Assistant will place the Survey Rod against that mark
and hold the rod vertically, with one end just touching the liquid surface; and
D III Roberts Pond
A mark has been painted on the railing of the pump stand in Roberts Pond. The Assistant will place the Survey Rod against that mark and hold the rod
vertically, with one end just touching the liquid surface.

Formatted: Indent: Hanging: 2", Outlinenumbered + Level: 7 + Numbering Style: I, II,III, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Alignedat: 3" + Tab after: 2.5" + Indent at: 3.5"
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 10 of 51
Based on the foregoing methods, the approximate coordinate locations for the
measuring points for Roberts Pond and the Cells are:
Northing Easting
Roberts Pond 323,041 2,579,697
Cell 1 322,196 2,579,277
Cell 3 320,508 2,577,760
Cell 4A 320,300 2,579,360

These coordinate locations may vary somewhat depending on solution elevations in the Pond and Cells;
B. Cell 4A Beach Elevation
The Assistant will place the Survey Rod at the point on the beach area of Cell 4A
that has the highest elevation. If it is not clear which area of the beach has the highest elevation, then multiple points on the beach area will be surveyed until the
Surveyor is satisfied that the point on the Cell 4A beach area with the highest
elevation has been surveyed. If it is clear that all points on the Cell 4A beach area
are below 5,593 FMSL, then the Surveyor may rely on one survey point;

(i)(ix) The Assistant will hold the Survey Rod vertically with one end of the Survey
Rod just touching the pond surface. The Assistant will ensure that the Survey
Rod is vertical by gently rocking the rod back and forth until the Surveyor has
established a level reading; (ii)(x) The Surveyor will focus the cross hairs of the Survey Instrument on the scale
on the Survey Rod, and record the number (the “Pond Surface Reading”), which represents the number of feet the Survey Instrument is reading above the pond
surface level.
The Surveyor will calculate the elevation of the pond surface as FSML by adding the Reference Point Reading for the Cell or Roberts Pond, as the case may be, to the Reference
Point Elevation for the Cell or Roberts Pond and subtracting the Pond Surface Reading for the Cell or Roberts Pond, and will record the number accurate to 0.01 feet.

e) Decontamination Pads
(i) New Decontamination Pad
The New Decontamination Pad is located in the southeast corner of the ore
pad, near the Mill’s scale house.

Formatted: Outline numbered + Level: 6 +Numbering Style: A, B, C, … + Start at: 1 +Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 1.15" + Tabafter: 1.5" + Indent at: 1.5"
Formatted: Outline numbered + Level: 5 +Numbering Style: i, ii, iii, … + Start at: 1 +Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.75" + Tabafter: 1" + Indent at: 1", Tab stops: 1.25",Left + Not at 1.94"
Formatted: Outline numbered + Level: 5 +
Numbering Style: i, ii, iii, … + Start at: 1 +Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.75" + Tabafter: 1" + Indent at: 1", Tab stops: 1.25",Left
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 11 of 51
A. In order to ensure that the primary containment of the New
Decontamination Pad water collection system has not been compromised, and to provide an inspection capability to detect
leakage from the primary containment, vertical inspection portals have been installed between the primary and secondary containments;
B. These portals will be visually observed on a weekly basis as a means
of detecting any leakage from the primary containment into the void
between the primary and secondary containment. The depth to water
in each portal will be measured weekly, by physically measuring the
depth to water with an electrical sounding tape/device. All
measurements must be made from the same measuring point and be
made to the nearest 0.01 foot;
C. These inspections will be recorded on the Weekly Tailings Inspection form;
D. The water level shall not exceed 0.10 foot above the concrete floor in
any standpipe, at any time. This will be determined by subtracting the weekly depth to water measurement from the distance from the
measuring point in the standpipe to the dry concrete floor;
E. Any observation of fluid between the primary and secondary
containments will be reported to the Radiation Safety Officer (RSO).

F. In addition to inspection of the water levels in the standpipes, the
New Decontamination Pad, including the concrete integrity of the
exposed surfaces of the pad, will be inspected on a weekly basis.
Observations will be made of the current condition of the New
Decontamination Pad. Any abnormalities relating to the pad and any damage to the concrete wash surface of the pad will be noted on the
Weekly Tailings Inspection form. If there are any cracks greater than 1/8 inch separation (width), the RSO must be contacted. The RSO
will have the responsibility to cease activities and have the cracks repaired.

(ii) Existing Decontamination Pad
The Existing Decontamination Pad is located between the northwest corner of the
Mill’s maintenance shop and the ore feeding grizzly.

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 12 of 51
A. The Existing Decontamination Pad will be inspected on a weekly
basis. Observations will be made of the current condition of the Existing Decontamination Pad, including the concrete integrity of the
exposed surfaces of the pad. Any abnormalities relating to the pad and any damage or cracks on the concrete wash surface of the pad
will be noted on the Weekly Tailings Inspection form. If there are any cracks greater than 1/8 inch separation (width), the RSO must be
contacted. The RSO will have the responsibility to cease activities
and have the cracks repaired.

e)f) Summary

In addition, the weekly inspection should summarize all activities concerning the tailings area for that particular week.
Results of the weekly tailings inspection are recorded on the Weekly Tailings and DMT Inspection
form. An example of the Weekly Tailings and DMT Inspection form is provided in Appendix A.
3.2. Weekly Inspection of Solution Levels in Roberts Pond
On a weekly basis, solution elevations are taken on Roberts Pond, in accordance with the procedures set out in Section 3.1 d) above. The Weekly solution level in Roberts Pond is recorded on the
Weekly Tailings and DMT Inspection form. Based on historical observations, the FML at the Pond Surface Reading area for Roberts Pond, is approximately six inches above the lowest point on the
pond’s FML. If the pond solution elevation at the Pond Surface Reading area is at or below the FML
for that area, the pond will be recorded as being dry.

3.3. Weekly Feedstock Storage Area Inspections

Weekly feedstock storage area inspections will be performed by the Radiation Safety Department, to confirm that:
a) the bulk feedstock materials are stored and maintained within the defined area described in
the GWDP, as indicated on the map attached hereto as Appendix D;
b) a 4 ft. buffer is maintained at the periphery of the storage area which is absent bulk material in order to assure that the materials do not encroach upon the boundary of the storage area;
and
c) all alternate feedstock located outside the defined Feedstock Area are maintained within
water tight containers.

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 13 of 51
The results of this inspection will be recorded on the Ore Storage/Sample Plant Weekly Inspection
Report, a copy of which is contained in Appendix A. Any variance in stored materials from this requirement or observed leaking alternate feedstock drums or other containers will be brought to the
attention of Mill Management and rectified within 15 days.
4. MONTHLY TAILINGS INSPECTION
Monthly tailings inspections will be performed by the Radiation Safety Officer or his designee from
the Radiation Safety Department and recorded on the Monthly Inspection Data form, an example of
which is contained in Appendix A. Monthly inspections are to be performed no sooner than 14 days
since the last monthly tailings inspection and can be conducted concurrently with the quarterly
tailings inspection when applicable. The following items are to be inspected:
a) Tailings Slurry Pipeline
When the Mill is operating, the slurry pipeline will be inspected at key locations to
determine pipe wear. Pipe thickness will be measured using an ultrasonic device by either the radiation safety staff or other trained designees. The critical points of the
pipe include bends, slope changes, valves, and junctions, which are critical to dike stability. These locations to be monitored will be determined by the Radiation Safety
Officer or his designee from the Radiation Safety Department during the Mill run.
b) Diversion Ditches
Diversion ditches 1, 2 and 3 shall be monitored monthly for sloughing, erosion,
undesirable vegetation, and obstruction of flow. Diversion berm 2 should be checked
for stability and signs of distress.
c) Sedimentation Pond
Activities around the Mill and facilities area sedimentation pond shall be summarized
for the month.
d) Overspray Dust Minimization
The inspection shall include an evaluation of overspray minimization, if applicable. This entails ensuring that the overspray system is functioning properly. In the event
that overspray is carried more than 50 feet from the cell, the overspray system should be immediately shut-off.

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 14 of 51
e) Remarks
A section is included on the Monthly Inspection Data form for remarks in which
recommendations can be made or observations of concern can be documented.
f) Summary of Daily, Weekly and Quarterly Inspections
The monthly inspection will also summarize the daily, weekly and, if applicable,
quarterly tailings inspections for the specific month.

In addition, settlement monitors are typically surveyed monthly and the results reported on the Monthly Inspection Data form.
5. QUARTERLY TAILINGS INSPECTION
The quarterly tailings inspection is performed by the Radiation Safety Officer or his designee from
the Radiation Safety Department, having the training specified in Section 2.4 above, once per calendar quarter. A quarterly inspection should be performed no sooner than 45 days since the
previous quarterly inspection was performed.
Each quarterly inspection shall include an Embankment Inspection, an Operations/Maintenance Review, a Construction Review and a Summary, as follows:
a) Embankment Inspection

The Embankment inspection involves a visual inspection of the crest, slope and toe
of each dike for movement, seepage, severe erosion, subsidence, shrinkage cracks,
and exposed liner.

b) Operations/Maintenance Review
The Operations/Maintenance Review consists of reviewing Operations and Maintenance activities pertaining to the tailings area on a quarterly basis.
c) Construction Review
The Construction Review consists of reviewing any construction changes or
modifications made to the tailings area on a quarterly basis.
Formatted: Widow/Orphan control, Keep withnext
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 15 of 51
d) Summary
The summary will include all major activities or observations noted around the
tailings area on a quarterly basis.
If any of these conditions are noted, the conditions and corrective measures taken should be documented in the Quarterly Inspection Data form. An example of the Quarterly Inspection Data
form is provided in Appendix A.

6. ANNUAL EVALUATIONS
The following annual evaluations shall be performed:
6.1. Annual Technical Evaluation
An annual technical evaluation of the tailings management system is performed by a registered
professional engineer (PE), who has experience and training in the area of geotechnical aspects of retention structures. The technical evaluation includes an on-site inspection of the tailings
management system and a thorough review of all tailings records for the past year. The Technical Evaluation also includes a review and summary of the annual movement monitor survey (see Section
5.2 below).
All tailings cells and corresponding dikes will be inspected for signs of erosion, subsidence, shrinkage, and seepage. The drainage ditches will be inspected to evaluate surface water control
structures.

In the event tailings capacity evaluations (as per SOP PBL-3) were performed for the receipt of
alternate feed material during the year, the capacity evaluation forms and associated calculation
sheets will be reviewed to ensure that the maximum tailings capacity estimate is accurate. The
amount of tailings added to the system since the last evaluation will also be calculated to determine the estimated capacity at the time of the evaluation.
Tailings inspection records will consist of daily, weekly, monthly, and quarterly tailings inspections.
These inspection records will be evaluated to determine if any freeboard limits are being approached. Records will also be reviewed to summarize observations of potential concern. The
evaluation also involves discussion with the Environmental and/or Radiation Technician and the Radiation Safety Officer regarding activities around the tailings area for the past year. During the
annual inspection, photographs of the tailings area will be taken. The training of individuals will be reviewed as a part of the Annual Technical Evaluation.

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 16 of 51
The registered engineer will obtain copies of selected tailings inspections, along with the monthly
and quarterly summaries of observations of concern and the corrective actions taken. These copies will then be included in the Annual Technical Evaluation Report.
The Annual Technical Evaluation Report must be submitted by September 1stNovember 15th of every
year to:
Directing Dam Safety Engineer
State of Utah, Natural Resources
1636 West North Temple, Suite 220
Salt Lake City, Utah 84116-3156

6.2. Movement Monitors
A movement monitor survey is to be conducted by a licensed surveyor annually during the second quarter of each year. The movement monitor survey consists of surveying monitors along dikes 3-S,
4A-W, and 4A-S to detect any possible settlement or movement of the dikes. The data generated from this survey is reviewed and incorporated into the Annual Technical Evaluation Report of the
tailings management system.
6.3. Freeboard Limits
The freeboard limits set out in this Section are intended to capture the Local 6-hour Probable
Maximum Precipitation (PMP) event, which was determined in the January 10, 1990 Drainage
Report (the “Drainage Report”) for the White Mesa site to be 10 inches.

The flood volume from the PMP event over the Cell 1 pond area plus the adjacent drainage areas,
was calculated in the Drainage Report to be 103 acre feet of water, with a wave run up factor of
0.90 feet.
The flood volume from the PMP event over the Cell 2 and Cell 3 pond areas, plus the adjacent
drainage areas was calculated in the Drainage Report to be 123.4 acre-feet of water.
The flood volume from the PMP event over the Cell 4A area was calculated in the Drainage Report to be 36 acre-feet of water (40 acres, plus the adjacent drainage area of 3.25 acres, times
the PMP of 10 inches), with a wave run up factor of 0.77 feet.
The total pool surface area in Cell 1 is 52.9 acres and in Cell 4A is 40 acres. The top of the flexible membrane liner (“FML”) for Cell 1 is 5,618.2 FMSL and for Cell 4A is 5,598.5 FMSL.
Based on the foregoing, the freeboard limits for the Mill’s tailings cells will be set as follows:
Formatted: Superscript
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 17 of 51

6.3.1. Cell 1 The freeboard limit for Cell 1 will be set at 5,615.4 FMSL. This will allow Cell 1 to capture all of the PMP volume associated with Cell 1. The total volume requirement for Cell 1 is 103 acre feet divided by 52.9 acres equals 1.95 feet, plus the wave run up factor of 0.90 feet equals 2.85 feet. The freeboard limit is then 5,618.2 FMSL minus 2.85 feet equals 5,615.4 FMSL. Under Radioactive Materials License condition 10.3, this freeboard limit is set and is not recalculated annually.
6.3.2. Cell 2

The freeboard limit for Cell 2 is inapplicable, since Cell 2 is filled with solids. All of the PMP
volume associated with Cell 2 will be attributed to Cell 4A (and/or any future tailings cells).
6.3.3. Cell 3 The freeboard limit for Cell 3 is inapplicable, since Cell 3 is close to being filled with solids, and all of the PMP flood volume associated with Cell 3 will be attributed to Cell 4A (and/or any future tailings cells).
6.3.4. Cell 4A The freeboard limit for Cell 4A will be set assuming that the total PMP volume for Cells 2, 3 and 4A of 159.4 acre feet will be accommodated in Cell 4A. The procedure for calculating the freeboard limit for Cell 4A is as follows: (a) When the Pool Surface Area is 40 Acres When the pool surface area in Cell 4A is 40 acres (i.e., when there are no beaches), the freeboard limit for Cell 4A will be 5,593.7 FMSL, which is 4.76 feet below the FML (being the quotient of 159.4 acre feet divided by 40 acres, which equals 3.99 feet, plus the wave run up factor for Cell 4A of 0.77 feet, rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a foot); (b) When the Maximum Elevation of the Beach Area is 5,593 FMSL or Less When the maximum elevation of the beach area in Cell 4A is 5593 FMSL or less, then the freeboard limit will be 5,593.7 FMSL, which is the same as in (a) above. This allows for the situation where there may be beaches, but these beaches are at a lower elevation than the freeboard limit established in (a) above, and there is therefore ample freeboard above the beaches to hold the maximum PMP volume. The maximum elevation of the beach area will be determined by monthly surveys performed by Mill personnel in accordance with the Mill’s DMT Plan. (c) When the Maximum Elevation of the Beach Area First Exceeds 5,593 FMSL When the maximum elevation of the beach area in Cell 4A first exceeds 5,593 FMSL, then the
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 18 of 51
freeboard limit for the remainder of the ensuing year (period t=0) (until the next November 1) will be calculated when that elevation is first exceeded (the “Initial Calculation Date”), as follows: i) The total number of dry tons of tailings that have historically been deposited into Cell 4A prior to the Initial Calculation Date (“T0”) will be determined; ii) The expected number of dry tons to be deposited into Cell 4A for the remainder of the ensuing year (up to the next November 1), based on production estimates for that period (“Δ0*”), will be determined; iii) Δ0* will be grossed up by a safety factor of 150% to allow for a potential underestimation of the number of tons that will be deposited in the cell during the remainder of the ensuing year. This grossed up number can be referred to as the “modeled tonnage” for the period; iv) The total design tailings solid storage capacity of Cell 4A will be accepted as 2,094,000 dry tons of tailings; v) The available remaining space in Cell 4A for solids as at the Initial Calculation Date will be calculated as 2,094,000 dry tons minus T0; vi) The reduction in the pool surface area for the remainder of the ensuing year will be assumed to be directly proportional to the reduction in the available space in Cell 4A for solids. That is, the reduced pool surface area for period t=0 (“RPA0”), after the reduction, will be calculated to be: (1 – (Δ0* x 1.5) / (2,094,000 - T0)) x 40 acres = RPA0
vii) The required freeboard for Cell 4A for the remainder of the period t=0 can be calculated in feet to be the wave run up factor for Cell 4A of 0.77 feet plus the quotient of 159.4 acre feet divided by the RPA0. The freeboard limit for Cell 4A for the remainder of period t=0 would then be the elevation of the FML for Cell 4A of 5598.5 FMSL less this required freeboard amount, rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a foot; and viii) The foregoing calculations will be performed at the Initial Calculation Date and the resulting freeboard limit will persist until the next November 1. An example of this calculation is set out in Appendix F. (d) Annual Freeboard Calculation When the Maximum Elevation of the Beach Area Exceeds 5,593 FMSL On November 1 of each year (the “Annual Calculation Date”), the reduction in pool area for the ensuing year (referred to as period t) will be calculated by: i) First, calculating the Adjusted Reduced Pool Area for the previous period (ARPAt-1) to reflect actual tonnages deposited in Cell 4A for the previous period (period t-1). The RPAt-1 used for the previous period was based on expected tonnages for period t-1, grossed up by a safety factor. The ARPAt-1 is merely the RPA that would have been used for period t-1 had the actual tonnages for year t-1 been known at the outset of period t-1 and had the RPA been calculated based on the actual tonnages for period t-1. This allows the freeboard calculations to be corrected each year to take into
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 19 of 51
account actual tonnages deposited in the cell as of the date of the calculation. The ARPAt-1 can be calculated using the following formula: (1 – Δt-1 / (2,094,000 – Tt-1)) x ARPAt-2 = ARPAt-1
Where: • Δt-1 is the actual number of dry tons of tailings solids deposited in Cell 4A during period t-1; • Tt-1 is the actual number of dry tons of tailings solids historically deposited in Cell 4A prior to the beginning of period t-1; and • ARPAt-2 is the Adjusted Reduced Pool Area for period t-2. If period t-2 started at the Initial Calculation Date, then ARPAt-2 is 40 acres; ii) Once the ARPAt-1 for the previous period (period t-1) has been calculated, the RPA for the subject period (period t) can be calculated as follows: (1 – (Δt* x 1.5) / (2,094,000 - Tt)) x ARPAt-1 = RPAt Where:
• Δt* is the expected number of dry tons of tailings to be deposited into Cell 4A for the ensuing year (period t), based on production estimates for the year (as can be seen from the foregoing formula, this expected number is grossed up by a safety factor of 1.5); • Tt is the actual number of dry tons of tailings solids historically deposited in Cell 4A prior to the beginning of period t; and
• ARPAt-1 is the Adjusted Reduced Pool Area for period t-1, which is the pool surface area for the previous period (period t-1) that should have applied during that period, had modeled tonnages (i.e., expected tonnages grossed up by the 150% safety factor) equaled actual tonnages for the period; iii) The required freeboard for period t can be calculated in feet to be the wave run up factor for Cell 4A of 0.77 feet plus the quotient of 159.4 acre feet divided by the RPAt. The freeboard limit for Cell 4A for period t would then be the elevation of the FML for Cell 4A of 5598.5 FMSL less this required freeboard amount, rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a foot; and iv) The foregoing calculations will be performed at the Annual Calculation Date for period t and the resulting freeboard limit will persist until the next Annual Calculation Date for period t+1. An example of this calculation is set out in Appendix F. (e) When a Spillway is Added to Cell 4A that Allows Overflow Into a New Tailings Cell
When a spillway is added between Cell 4A and a new tailings cell (Cell 4B), then, if an approved freeboard limit calculation method for the new cell is set to cover the entire PMP event for Cells 2, 3,
4A and 4B, the freeboard limit for Cell 4A will be inapplicable, except for approved provisions to
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 20 of 51
prevent storm water runoff from overtopping dikes.
a) Tailings Cells 1 and 4A
The freeboard limits are as per January 10, 1990 Drainage Report for Cells 1
and 4A and are stated below:
(i) A liquid maximum elevation of 5,615.4 feet mean sea level in Cell 1.

(ii) A liquid maximum elevation of 5,596.4 feet mean sea level in Cell 4A.
b) Tailings Cell 3
The freeboard limit for Cell 3 is determined annually using the following
procedure:
(i) From a survey of Cell 3, the pool surface will be determined.
(ii) An estimate of the maximum tons of dry tailings to be generated during the next 12 months will be made. This estimate is multiplied by 1.5, a
factor of safety, to yield the Maximum Mill Production.
(iii) The Maximum Mill Production is divided by the number of tons required
to reduce the pool size by one acre and then subtracted from the pool
surface (determined in Step i), yielding the Reduced Pool Area.

(iv) The PMP Flood Volume Requirement, as per the January 10, 1990
Drainage Report, is 123.4 acre feet. The PMP Flood Volume
Requirement is divided by the Reduced Pool Area to determine the PMP
Freeboard Level.
(v) The Wave Run Up of 0.78 feet (as specified in the January 10, 1990 Drainage Report) is added to the PMP Freeboard Level to determine the
Total Required Freeboard.
The calculation of the Total Required Freeboard for Cell 3 will be calculated annually and the calculation sheet filed in the Mill Central File.
c) Tailings Cell 4A

The freeboard limit for Cell 4A is determined annually using the following
procedure:
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 21 of 51

The Cell 4A design includes a concrete spillway between Cell 3 and Cell 4A, with the invert elevation 4 feet below the top of the Cell 3 dike, at an elevation
of 5604.5 feet amsl. Should Cell 3 receive the full PMP volume of 123.4 acre feet of water, approximately 62 acre feet of that volume would flow through
the spillway into Cell 4A.
The flood volume from the PMP event over the Cell 4A area is 36 acre-feet of
water (40 acres, plus the adjacent drainage area of 3.25 acres, times the PMP of
10 inches). This would result in a total flood volume of 98 acre-feet, including
the 62 acre-feet of solution from Cell 3. The freeboard depth required for Cell
4A from the PMP event would be 2.44 feet, plus a wave run-up depth of 0.77 feet
(from the 1990 Drainage Report), for a total freeboard requirement of 3.2 feet. This calculation is illustrated on Attachment 4. The Groundwater Quality
Discharge Permit, No. UGW370004, for the White Mesa Mill requires that the minimum freeboard be no less than 3.0 feet for any of the existing Cell
construction, but based on the above calculation the freeboard would be set 3.2 feet below the top of liner. The freeboard for Cell 4A would therefore be 5595.3
amsl (top of liner 5598.5 – 3.2 feet).
The calculation of the Total Required Freeboard for Cell 4A will be calculated annually and the calculation sheet filed in the Mill Central File.
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 22 of 51

6.3.5. Roberts Pond
The freeboard limit for Roberts Pond is a liquid maximum elevation of 5,624.0 feet above mean sea level, as specified in the GWDP.
d) Roberts Pond

The freeboard limit for Roberts Pond is a liquid maximum elevation of 5,624.0
feet above mean sea level, as specified in the GWDP.

6.4. Annual Leak Detection Fluid Samples
In the event solution has been detected in a leak detection system, a sample will be collected on an
annual basis. This sample will be analyzed according to the conditions set forth in License Condition 11.3.C. The results of the analysis will be reviewed to determine the origin of the
solution.
6.5. Annual Inspection of the Decontamination Pads
a) New Decontamination Pad
During the second quarter of each year, the New Decontamination Pad will be taken out of service
and inspected to ensure the integrity of the wash pad’s exposed concrete surface. If any
abnormalities are identified, i.e. cracks in the concrete with greater than 1/8 inch separation (width)
or any significant deterioration or damage of the pad surface, repairs will be made prior to resuming
the use of the facility. All inspection findings and any repairs required shall be documented on the
Annual Decontamination Pad Inspection form. The inspection findings, any repairs required and
repairs completed shall be summarized in the 2nd Quarter DMT Monitoring Report due September 1
of each calendar year.
b) Existing Decontamination Pad During the second quarter of each year, the Existing Decontamination Pad will be taken out of
service and inspected to ensure the integrity of the steel tank. If any abnormalities are identified, repairs will be made prior to resuming the use of the facility. All inspection findings and any repairs
required shall be documented on the Annual Decontamination Pad Inspection form. The inspection findings, any repairs required and repairs completed shall be summarized in the 2nd Quarter DMT
Monitoring Report due September 1 of each calendar year.
7. OTHER INSPECTIONS
All daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly and annual inspections and evaluations should be performed as
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 23 of 51
specified in Sections 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 above. However, additional inspections should be conducted
after any significant storm or significant natural or man-made event occurs.
8. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
In addition to the Daily Inspection Data, Weekly Tailings Inspection, Monthly Inspection Data and Quarterly Inspection Data forms included as Appendix A and described in Sections 2, 3, 4 and 5
respectively, and the Operating Foreman’s Daily Inspection and Weekly Mill Inspection forms
described in Sections 2 and 3, respectively, the following additional reports shall also be prepared:

8.1. Monthly Tailings Reports

Monthly tailings reports are prepared every month and summarize the previous month's activities around the tailings area. If not prepared by the Radiation Safety Officer, the report shall be
submitted to the Radiation Safety Officer for review. The Mill Manager will review the report as well before the report is filed in the Mill Central File. The report will contain a summary of
observations of concern noted on the daily and weekly tailings inspections. Corrective measures taken during the month will be documented along with the observations where appropriate. All daily
and weekly tailings inspection forms will be attached to the report. A monthly inspection form will also be attached. Quarterly inspection forms will accompany the report when applicable. The report
will be signed and dated by the preparer in addition to the Radiation Safety Officer and the Mill Manager.
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 24 of 51

8.2. DMT Reports
Quarterly reports of DMT monitoring activities, which will include the following information, will be provided to the Executive Secretary on the schedule provided in Table 5 of the GWDP:
a) On a quarterly basis, all required information required by Part 1.F.2 of the GWDP
relating to the inspections described in Section 3.1(b) (Slimes Drain Water Level
Monitoring), 3.1(d) (Tailings Wastewater Pool and Beach Area Elevation
Monitoring), 3.2 (Weekly Inspection of Solution Levels in Roberts Pond) and 3.3
(Weekly Feedstock Storage Area Inspections);

b) On a quarterly basis, a summary of the daily water level (depth) inspections for the quarter for the presence of fluid in all three vertical inspection portals for each
of the three chambers in the concrete settling tank system for the New Decontamination Pad, which will include a table indicating the water level
measurements in each portal during the quarter;
c) With respect to the annual inspection of the New Decontamination Pad described in Section 6.5(a), the inspection findings, any repairs required, and repairs
completed shall be summarized in the 2nd Quarter report, due September 1 of each calendar year;

d) With respect to the annual inspection of the Existing Decontamination Pad
described in Section 6.5(b), the inspection findings, any repairs required, and
repairs completed shall be summarized in the 2nd Quarter report, due September 1
of each calendar year; and

e) An annual summary and graph for each calendar year of the depth to wastewater
in the Cell 2 slimes drain must be included in the fourth quarter report. After the first year, and beginning in 2008, quarterly reports shall include both the current
year monthly values and a graphic comparison to the previous year.
Quarterly reports of DMT monitoring activities of all required information required by Part 1.F.2 of the GWDP relating to the inspections described in Section 3.1(b) (Slimes Drain Water Level
Monitoring), 3.1(d) (Tailings Wastewater Pool Elevation Monitoring), 3.2 (Weekly Inspection of Solution Levels in Roberts Pond) and 3.3 (Weekly Feedstock Storage Area Inspections) will be
provided to the Executive Secretary on the schedule provided in Table 5 of the GWDP. An annual summary and graph for each calendar year of the depth to wastewater in the Cell 2 slimes drain must
be included in the fourth quarter report. After the first year, and beginning in 2008, quarterly reports
shall include both the current year monthly values and a graphic comparison to the previous year.

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 25 of 51

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 26 of 51

APPENDIX A
FORMS
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 27 of 51

APPENDIX A (CONT.) DAILY INSPECTION DATA Inspector:________________
Date;___________________
Accompanied by:_________
Time:___________________
Any Item not “OK” must be documented. A check mark = OK, X = Action Required I. TAILINGS SLURRY TRANSPORT SYSTEM
Inspection Items Conditions of Potential Concern Cell 1 Cell 2 Cell 3 Cell 4A

Slurry Pipeline Leaks, Damage, Blockage, Sharp Bends
Pipeline Joints Leaks, Loose Connections
Pipeline Supports Damage, Loss of Support
Valves Leaks, Blocked, Closed
Point(s) of Discharge Improper Location or Orientation

II. OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS
Inspection Items Conditions of Potential Concern Cell 1 Cell 2 Cell 3 Cell 4A

Water Level Greater Than Operating Level, Large Change
Since Previous Inspection

Beach Cracks, Severe Erosion, Subsidence
Liner and Cover Erosion of cover, Exposure of Liner

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 28 of 51

III. DIKES AND EMBANKMENTS
Inspection Items Conditions of Potential Concern Dike
1-I
Dike 1-
1A
Dike 2 Dike 3 Dike 4A-
S
Dike 4A-
W

Slopes Sloughs or Sliding Cracks, Bulges, Subsidence, Severe Erosion, Moist Areas, Areas of Seepage Outbreak

Crest Cracks, Subsidence, Severe Erosion

IV. FLOW RATES Slurry Line(s) Pond Return S-X Tails Spray System

GPM

V. PHYSICAL INSPECTION OF SLURRY LINES(S)
Walked to Discharge Point ____________Yes _____________No
Observed Entire Discharge Line ____________Yes _____________No

VI. DUST CONTROL
Cell 2 Cell 3 Cell 4A

Dusting
Wind Movement of Tailings

Precipitation: ______________________ inches liquid

General Meteorological conditions:__________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 29 of 51

VII. DAILY LEAK DETECTION CHECK
Cell 1 Cell 2 Cell 3 Cell 4A

Leak Detection System Checked _________Checked ______Wet______Dry Initial level__________

Final level___________

Gal. pumped_________
_________Checked ______Wet______Dry Initial level__________

Final level___________

Gal. pumped_________
_________Checked ______Wet______Dry Initial level__________

Final level___________

Gal. pumped_________
_________Checked ______Wet______Dry Initial level__________

Final level___________

Gal. pumped_________

VIII OBSERVATIONS OF POTENTIAL CONCERN

Action Required

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 30 of 51

[MAP OF TAILINGS AREA]

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 31 of 51
APPENDIX A (CONT)
DENISON MINES (USA) CORP.
WEEKLY TAILINGS INSPECTION
Date:_________________ Inspectors: ______________________________

1. Pond elevations (msl, ft) Cell 1: (a) Pond Solution Elevation ________________

(b) FML Bottom Elevation ______5597______
(c) Depth of Water above FML ((a)-(b)) _______________
Cell 3: (a)Pond Solution Elevation ________________ (b)FML Bottom Elevation ______5570______ (c)Depth of Water above FML ((a)-(b)) _______________
Cell 4A: (a)Pond Solution Elevation _______________
(b)FML Bottom Elevation ______ 5564_____ (c)Depth of Water above FML ((a)-(b)) ______________
Roberts Pond: (a)Pond Solution Elevation _______________
(b)FML Bottom Elevation ______5612.34___ (c)Depth of Water above FML ((a)-(b)) _______________

2. Slimes Drain Liquid Levels Cell 2 Pump functioning properly ________ Pump Timer set at 15min on 45 min off ________
________________Depth to Liquid pre-pump
________________Depth to Liquid Post-pump (all measurements are depth-in-pipe)
Pre-pump head is 38’-Depth to Liquid Pre-pump =
_______ Post-pump head is 38’ –Depth to Liquid Post-pump = ______

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 32 of 51

3. Leak Detection Systems
Observation:
Cell 1 Cell 2 Cell 3 Cell 4A

Is LDS wet or dry? _____wet____dry _____wet____dry _____wet____dry _____wet____dry
If wet, Record
liquid level:
_______Ft to
Liquid
_______Ft to
Liquid
_______Ft to
Liquid
_______Ft to
Liquid *
If sufficient fluid is
present, record volume of fluid
pumped and flow
rate:
Volume _______
Flow Rate______
Volume _______
Flow Rate______
Volume _______
Flow Rate______
Volume _______
Flow Rate______
Was fluid sample collected? ____yes____no ____yes____no ____yes____no ____yes____no

Observation:
New Decon Pad, Portal 1 New Decon Pad, Portal 2 New Decon Pad Portal 3

Is LDS (Portal) wet or dry? _____wet____dry _____wet____dry _____wet____dry
If wet, Record liquid level: _______Ft to Liquid _______Ft to Liquid _______Ft to Liquid

If wet, Report to RSO

4. Tailings Area Inspection (Note dispersal of blowing tailings): __________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
5. Control Methods Implemented:__________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. Remarks:_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. Contaminated Waste Dump:____________________________________________________
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 33 of 51

* Does Level exceed 12 inches above the lowest point on the bottom flexible membrane liner (elevation
5556.14 amsl)? _____ no _____ yes
If Cell 4A leak detection system level exceeds 12 inches above the lowest point on the bottom flexible membrane liner (elevation 5556.14 amsl), notify supervisor or Mill manager immediately.

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 34 of 51
APPENDIX A (CONT.)
MONTHLY INSPECTION DATA

Inspector: ____________________________
Date: ________________________________
1. Slurry Pipeline: __________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________ Pipe Thickness:____________(To be measured only during periods when the Mill is operating)
2. Diversion Ditches and Diversion Berm:
Observation: Diversion Ditch 1 Diversion Ditch 2 Diversion Ditch 3 Diversion Berm 2 Diversion Ditches:
Sloughing _____yes_____no _____yes_____no _____yes_____no Erosion _____yes_____no _____yes_____no _____yes_____no
Undesirable Vegetation _____yes_____no _____yes_____no _____yes_____no
Obstruction of Flow _____yes_____no _____yes_____no _____yes_____no
Diversion Berm:
Stability Issues _____yes_____no Signs of Distress _____yes_____no
Comments:__________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. Summary of Activities Around Sedimentation Pond: ____________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 35 of 51
4. Overspray Dust Minimization:
Overspray system functioning properly: _______yes_______no

Overspray carried more than 50 feet from the cell: _____yes______no If “yes”, was system immediately shut off? _____yes_____no
Comments:__________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
5. Remarks: ________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. Settlement Monitors
Cell 2 W1: ____________ Cell 2W3-S: ____________ Cell 3-1N: _____________ Cell 2 W2: ____________ Cell 2E1-N: ____________ Cell 3-1C: _____________ Cell 2 W3: ____________ Cell 2E1-1S: ____________ Cell 3-1S: _____________
Cell 2 W4: ____________ Cell 2E1-2S: ____________ Cell 3-2N: _____________ Cell 2W7-C: ____________ Cell 2 East: ____________ Cell 2W5-N: ___________
Cell 2 W7N: ____________ Cell 2 W7S: ____________ Cell 2 W6N: ___________ Cell 2 W6C: ____________ Cell 2 W6S: ____________ Cell 2 W4N: ___________ Cell 4A-Toe: ___________ Cell 2 W4S: ____________ Cell 2 W5C: ___________
Cell 3-2C: _____________ Cell 3-2S: _____________ Cell 2 W5S: ___________
7. Summary of Daily, Weekly and Quarterly Inspections: __________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
8. Monthly Slimes Drain Static Head Measurement for Cell 2 (Depth-in-Pipe Water Level
Reading): __________________

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 36 of 51
APPENDIX A (CONT.)
WHITE MESA MILL
TAILINGS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
QUARTERLY INSPECTION DATA

Inspector: ____________________________
Date: ________________________________
1. Embankment Inspection: ______________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________

2. Operations/Maintenance Review: _______________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________
3. Construction Activities: ____________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
4. Summary: ___________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 37 of 51
APPENDIX A (CONT.)
ORE STORAGE/SAMPLE PLANT WEEKLY INSPECTION REPORT
Week of _________ through _________ Date of Inspection:_________________
Inspector:_________________________
Weather conditions for the week:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________
Blowing dust conditions for the week:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Corrective actions needed or taken for the week: ____________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________
Are all bulk feedstock materials stored in the area indicated on the attached diagram:
yes:_______ no:________ comments:____________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
Are all alternate feedstock materials located outside the area indicated on the attached diagram maintained
within water-tight containers: yes:_______ no:_______
comments (e.g., conditions of containers):______________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Are all sumps and low lying areas free of standing solutions?
Yes: _______ No: _______
If “No”, how was the situation corrected, supervisor contacted and correction date? ____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Is there free standing water or water running off of the feedstock stockpiles?
Yes: ______ No: _______ Comments:Conditions of storage areas for materials:
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 38 of 51
____________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________
Other comments:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 39 of 51
APPENDIX A (CONT.)
ANNUAL DECONTAMINATION PAD INSPECTION
Date of Inspection: _________________
Inspector: _________________________ New Decontamination Pad:
Are there any cracks on the wash pad surface greater than 1/8 inch of separation? __Yes ___No
Is there any significant deterioration or damage of the pad surface? ____Yes ____No
Findings: ____________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Repair Work Required: ____________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Existing Decontamination Pad:
Were there any observed problems with the steel tank? ____Yes ____No

Findings: ____________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Repair Work Required: ____________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Formatted: Centered
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 40 of 51

APPENDIX B
TAILINGS INSPECTOR TRAINING

This document provides the training necessary for qualifying management-designated individuals for conducting daily tailings inspections. Training information is presented by the Radiation Safety
Officer or designee from the Environmental Department. Daily tailings inspections are conducted in accordance with the White Mesa Mill Tailings Management System and Discharge Minimization
Technology (DMT) Monitoring Plan. The Radiation Safety Officer or designee from the Radiation Safety Department is responsible for performing monthly and quarterly tailings inspections. Tailings
inspection forms will be included in the monthly tailings inspection reports, which summarize the conditions, activities, and areas of concern regarding the tailings areas.
Notifications:

The inspector is required to record whether all inspection items are normal (satisfactory, requiring no
action) or that conditions of potential concern exist (requiring action). A “check” mark indicates no
action required. If conditions of potential concern exist the inspector should mark an “X” in the area
the condition pertains to, note the condition, and specify the corrective action to be taken. If an
observable concern is made, it should be noted on the tailings report until the corrective action is
taken and the concern is remedied. The dates of all corrective actions should be noted on the reports
as well.
Any major catastrophic events or conditions pertaining to the tailings area should be reported immediately to the Mill Manager or the Radiation Safety Officer, one of whom will notify Corporate
Management. If dam failure occurs, notify your supervisor and the Mill Manager immediately. The Mill Manager will then notify Corporate Management, MSHA (303-231-5465), and the State of
Utah, Division of Dam Safety (801-538-7200).
Inspections:
All areas of the tailings disposal system are routinely patrolled and visible observations are to be
noted on a daily tailings inspection form. Refer to Appendix A for an example of the daily tailings
inspection form. The inspection form consists of three pages and is summarized as follows:

1. Tailings Slurry Transport System: The slurry pipeline is to be inspected for leaks, damage, and sharp bends. The pipeline joints
are to be monitored for leaks, and loose connections. The pipeline supports are to be
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 41 of 51
inspected for damage and loss of support. Valves are also to be inspected particularly for
leaks, blocked valves, and closed valves. Points of discharge need to be inspected for improper location and orientation.
2. Operational Systems:
Operating systems including water levels, beach liners, and covered areas are items to be
inspected and noted on the daily inspection forms. Sudden changes in water levels
previously observed or water levels exceeding the operating level of a pond are potential
areas of concern and should be noted. Beach areas that are observed as having cracks, severe
erosion or cavities are also items that require investigation and notation on daily forms.
Exposed liner or absence of cover from erosion are potential items of concern for ponds and
covered areas. These should also be noted on the daily inspection form.
Cells 1, 3 and 4A solution levels are to be monitored closely for conditions nearing maximum operating level and for large changes in the water level since the last inspection.
All pumping activities affecting the water level will be documented. In Cells 1 and 3, the PVC liner needs to be monitored closely for exposed liner, especially after storm events. It is
important to cover exposed liner immediately as exposure to sunlight will cause degradation of the PVC liner. Small areas of exposed liner should be covered by hand. Large sections of
exposed liner will require the use of heavy equipment
These conditions are considered serious and require immediate action. After these conditions have been noted to the Radiation Safety Officer, a work order will be written by the
Radiation Safety Officer and turned into the Maintenance Department. All such repairs
should be noted in the report and should contain the start and finish date of the repairs.

3. Dikes and Embankments:

Inspection items include the slopes and the crests of each dike. For slopes, areas of concern are sloughs or sliding cracks, bulges, subsidence, severe erosion, moist areas, and areas of
seepage outbreak. For crests, areas of concern are cracks, subsidence, and severe erosion. When any of these conditions are noted, an “X” mark should be placed in the section marked
for that dike.
In addition, the dikes, in particular dikes 3, 4A-S and 4A-W, should be inspected closely for mice holes and more importantly for prairie dog holes, as the prairie dogs are likely to
burrow in deep, possibly to the liner. If any of these conditions exist, the inspection report should be marked accordingly.
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 42 of 51

4. Flow Rates:
Presence of all flows in and out of the cells should be noted. Flow rates are to be estimated in gallons per minute (GPM). Rates need to be determined for slurry lines, pond return, SX-
tails, and the spray system. During non-operational modes, the flow rate column should be marked as “0”. The same holds true when the spray system is not utilized.

5. Physical Inspection of Slurry Line(s):

A physical inspection of all slurry lines has to be made every 4 hours during operation of the
mill. If possible, the inspection should include observation of the entire discharge line and
discharge spill point into the cell. If “fill to elevation” flags are in place, the tailings and build-up is to be monitored and controlled so as to not cover the flags.
6. Dust Control:
Dusting and wind movement of tailings should be noted for Cells 2, 3, and 4A. Other
observations to be noted include a brief description of present weather conditions, and a record of any precipitation received. Any dusting or wind movement of tailings should be
documented. In addition, an estimate should be made for wind speed at the time of the observed dusting or wind movement of tailings.
The Radiation Safety Department measures precipitation on a daily basis. Daily
measurements should be made as near to 8:00 a.m. as possible every day. Weekend
measurements will be taken by the Shifter as close to 8:00 a.m. as possible. All snow or ice
should be melted before a reading is taken.

7. Observations of Potential Concern: All observations of concern during the inspection should be noted in this section. Corrective
action should follow each area of concern noted. All work orders issued, contacts, or notifications made should be noted in this section as well. It is important to document all
these items in order to assure that the tailings management system records are complete and accurate.
8. Map of Tailings Cells:
The last section of the inspection involves drawing, as accurately as possible, the following
items where applicable.
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 43 of 51

1. Cover area 2. Beach/tailing sands area
3. Solution as it exists 4. Pump lines
5. Activities around tailings cell (i.e. hauling trash to the dump, liner repairs, etc.) 6. Slurry discharge when operating
7. Over spray system when operating

9. Safety Rules:
All safety rules applicable to the mill are applicable when in the tailings area. These rules
meet the required MSHA regulations for the tailings area. Please pay particular notice to the following rules:
1. The posted speed limit for the tailings area is 15 mph and should not be exceeded.
2. No food or drink is permitted in the area. 3. All personnel entering the tailings area must have access to a two-way radio.
4. Horseplay is not permitted at any time. 5. Only those specifically authorized may operate motor vehicles in the restricted area.
6. When road conditions are muddy or slick, a four-wheel drive vehicle is required in the area.
7. Any work performed in which there is a danger of falling or slipping in the cell will require the use of a safety belt or harness with attended life line and an approved life
jacket. A portable eyewash must be present on site as well.
8. Anytime the boat is used to perform any work; an approved life jacket and goggles must
be worn at all times. There must also be an approved safety watch with a two-way hand-
held radio on shore. A portable eyewash must be present on site as well.

10. Preservation of Wildlife:
Every effort should be made to prevent wildlife and domesticated animals from entering the tailings area. All wildlife observed should be reported on the Wildlife Report Worksheet
during each shift. Waterfowl seen near the tailings cells should be discouraged from landing by the use of noisemakers.
11. Certification:
Following the review of this document and on-site instruction on the tailings system
inspection program, designated individuals will be certified to perform daily tailings
inspections. The Radiation Safety Officer authorizes certification. Refer to the Certification
Form, Appendix C. This form should be signed and dated only after a thorough review of the
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 44 of 51
tailings information previously presented. The form will then be signed by the Radiation
Safety Officer and filed.
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 45 of 51
APPENDIX C
CERTIFICATION FORM

Date: __________________________
Name: _________________________

I have read the document titled “Tailings Management System, White Mesa Mill Tailings
Inspector Training” and have received on-site instruction at the tailings system. This instruction
included documentation of daily tailings inspections, analysis of potential problems (dike
failures, unusual flows), notification procedures and safety.

____________________________________ Signature

I certify that the above-named person is qualified to perform the daily inspection of the tailings
system at the White Mesa Mill.

____________________________________
Radiation Safety Personnel/ Tailings System
Supervisor

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 46 of 51
APPENDIX D
FEEDSTOCK STORAGE AREA
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 47 of 51
APPENDIX E
TABLES
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 48 of 51

Table 1
Calculated Action leakage Rates
for Various head Conditions Cell 4A White mesa Mill
Blanding, Utah

Head above Liner System (feet) Calculated Action leakage Rate
( gallons / acre / day )
5 222.04
10 314.01
15 384.58
20 444.08
25 496.50
30 543.88
35 587.46
37 604.01

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 49 of 51
APPENDIX F
Example of Freeboard Calculations For Cell 4A Assumptions and Factors: o Total PMP volume to be stored in Cell 4A – 159.4 acre feet o Wave runup factor for Cell 4A – 0.77 feet o Total capacity of Cell 4A – 2,094,000 dry tons o Elevation of FML of Cell 4A – 5,598.5 FMSL o Maximum pool surface area of Cell 4A – 40 acres o Total tailings solids deposited into Cell 4A at time beach area first exceeds 5,593 FMSL – 1,000,000 dry tons* o Date beach area first exceeds 5,593, FMSL – March 1, 2009* o Expected and actual production is as set forth in the following table: Time Period Expected Tailings Solids Disposition into Cell 4A Determined at the beginning of the period (dry tons)*
Expected Tailings Solids Disposition into Cell 4A at the beginning of the period, multiplied by 150% Safety Factor (dry tons)
Actual Tailings Solids Disposition into Cell 4A determined at end of the period (dry tons)*
March 1, 2009 to November 1, 2009
150,000 225,000 225,000
November 1, 2009 to November 1, 2010
300,000 450,000 275,000
November 1, 2010 to November 1, 2011
200,000 300,000 250,000
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 50 of 51
*These expected and actual tailings and production numbers and dates are fictional and have been assumed for illustrative purposes only. Based on these assumptions and factors, the freeboard limits for Cell 4A would be calculated as follows: 1. Prior to March 1, 2009 Prior to March 1, 2009, the maximum elevation of the beach area in Cell 4 is less than or equal to 5,593 FMSL, therefore the freeboard limit is set at 5,593.7 FMSL. 2. March 1, 2009 to November 1, 2009 The pool surface area would be reduced to the following amount (1 – 225,000 / (2,094,000 – 1,000,000)) x 40 acres = 31.77 acres Based on this reduced pool area, the amount of freeboard would be 159.4 acre feet divided by 31.77 acres equals 5.02 feet. When the wave run up factor for Cell 4A of 0.77 feet is added to this, the total freeboard required is 5.79 feet. This means that the freeboard limit for Cell 4A would be reduced from 5593.7 FMSL to 5592.7 FMSL (5598.5 FMSL minus 5.79 feet, rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a foot). This calculation would be performed at March 1, 2009, and this freeboard limit would persist until November 1, 2009. 3. November 1, 2009 to November 1, 2010 The pool surface area would be reduced to the following amount: First, recalculate the pool surface area that should have applied during the previous period, had modeled tonnages (i.e., expected tonnages grossed up by the 150% safety factor) equaled actual tonnages for the period. Since the actual tonnage of 225,000 dry tons was the same as the modeled tonnage of 225,000 dry tons, the recalculated pool surface area is the same as the modeled pool surface area for the previous period, which is 31.77 acres. Then, calculate the modeled pool surface area to be used for the period: (1 – 450,000 / (2,094,000 – 1,000,000 - 225,000)) x 31.77 acres = 15.32 acres Based on this reduced pool area, the amount of freeboard would be 159.4 acre feet divided by 15.32 acres equals 10.40 feet. When the wave run up factor for Cell 4A of 0.77 feet is added to this, the total freeboard required is 11.17 feet. This means that the freeboard limit for Cell 4A would be reduced from 5592.7 FMSL to 5587.3 FMSL (5598.5 FMSL minus 11.17 feet, rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a foot). This calculation would be performed at November 1, 2009, and this freeboard limit would persist until November 1, 2010.
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 38/10 Revision: Denison-710
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 51 of 51
4. November 1, 2010 to November 1, 2011 The pool surface area would be reduced to the following amount: First, recalculate the pool surface area that should have applied during the previous period, had modeled tonnages (i.e., expected tonnages grossed up by the 150% safety factor) equaled actual tonnages for the period. Since modeled tonnages exceeded actual tonnages, the pool area was reduced too much during the previous period, and must be adjusted. The recalculated pool area for the previous period is: (1 – 275,000 / (2,094,000 – 1,000,000 - 225,000) x 31.77 acres = 21.72 acres. This recalculated pool surface area will be used as the starting point for the freeboard calculation to be performed at November 1, 2010. Then, calculate the modeled pool surface area to be used for the period: (1 – 300,000 / (2,094,000 – 1,000,000 - 225,000 – 275,000)) x 21.72 acres = 10.75 acres Based on this reduced pool area, the amount of freeboard would be 159.4 acre feet divided by 10.75 acres equals 14.83 feet. When the wave run up factor for Cell 4A of 0.77 feet is added to this, the total freeboard required is 15.60 feet. This means that the freeboard limit for Cell 4A would be reduced from 5587.3 FMSL to 5582.9 FMSL (5598.5 FMSL minus 15.60 feet, rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a foot). This calculation would be performed at November 1, 2010, and this freeboard limit would persist until November 1, 2011.
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 1 of 48

WHITE MESA MILL TAILINGS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
AND
DISCHARGE MINIMIZATION TECHNOLOGY (DMT)
MONITORING PLAN

1. INTRODUCTION
This Tailings Management System and Discharge Minimization Technology Monitoring Plan (the
“Plan”) for the White Mesa Mill (the “Mill”) provides procedures for monitoring of the tailings cell
system as required under State of Utah Radioactive Materials License No. UT1900479 (the
“Radioactive Materials License”), as well as procedures for operating and maintenance of monitoring
equipment and reporting procedures that are adequate to demonstrate DMT compliance under State
of Utah Ground Water Discharge Permit No. 370004 for the Mill (the “GWDP”).

This Plan is designed as a systematic program for constant surveillance and documentation of the
integrity of the tailings impoundment system including dike stability, liner integrity, and transport
systems, as well as monitoring of water levels in Roberts Pond and feedstock storage areas at the
Mill. The Plan requires daily, weekly, quarterly, monthly and annual inspections and evaluations and
monthly reporting to Mill management.

2. DAILY TAILINGS INSPECTIONS

The following daily tailings inspections shall be performed:

2.1. Daily Comprehensive Tailings Inspection

On a daily basis, including weekends, all areas connected with the four tailings cells will be
inspected. Observations will be made of the current condition of each cell, noting any corrective
action that needs to be taken.

The Environmental or Radiation Technician is responsible for performing the daily tailings
inspections. The Radiation Safety Officer may designate other individuals with training, as
described in Section 2.4 below, to perform the daily tailings inspection.

Observations made by the inspector will be recorded on the Daily Inspection Data form (a copy of
which is attached in Appendix A). The Daily Inspection Data form contains an inspection checklist,
which includes a tailings cells map, and spaces to record observations, especially those of immediate
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 2 of 48

concern and those requiring corrective action. The inspector will place a check by all inspection
items that appear to be operating properly. Those items where conditions of potential concern are
observed should be marked with an "X". A note should accompany the "X" specifying what the
concern is and what corrective measures will resolve the problem. This observation of concern
should be noted on the form until the problem has been remedied. The date that corrective action
was taken should be noted as well.

Areas to be inspected include the following: Cell 1, 2, 3, and 4A, Dikes 1, 2, 3, 4A-S, and 4A-W,
wind movement of tailings, effectiveness of dust minimization methods, spray evaporation, Cell 2
spillway, Cell 3 spillway, Cell 3 and 4A liquid pools and associated liquid return equipment, cell
leak detection systems, and the wildlife ponds.

Operational features of the tailings area are checked for conditions of potential concern. The
following items require visual inspection during the daily tailings inspection:

a) Tailings slurry and SX raffinate transport systems from the Mill to the active
disposal cell(s), and pool return pipeline and pumps.

Daily inspections of the tailings lines are required to be performed when the Mill
is operating. The lines to be inspected include the: tailings slurry lines from CCD
to the active tailings cell; SX raffinate lines that can discharge into Cell 1, Cell 3
or Cell 4A; the pond return line from the tailings area to the Mill; and, lines
transporting pond solutions from one cell to another.

b) Cell 1.

c) Cell 2.

d) Cell 3.

e) Cell 4A.

f) Dike structures including dikes 1, 2, 3, 4A-S, and 4A-W.

g) The Cell 2 spillway, Cell 3 spillway, Cell 3 and Cell 4A liquid pools and
associated liquid return equipment.

h) Presence of wildlife and/or domesticated animals in the tailings area, including
waterfowl and burrowing animal habitations.

i) Spray evaporation pumps and lines.

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 3 of 48

j) Wind movement of tailings and dust minimization.

Wind movement of tailings will be evaluated for conditions which may require
initiation of preventative dust minimization measures for cells containing tailings
sand. During tailings inspection, general surface conditions will be evaluated for
the following: 1) areas of tailings subject to blowing and/or wind movement, 2)
liquid pool size, 3) areas not subject to blowing and/or wind movement,
expressed as a percentage of the total cell area. The evaluations will be reviewed
on a weekly basis, or more frequently if warranted, and will be used to direct dust
minimization activities.

k) Observation of flow and operational status of the dust control/spray evaporation
system(s).

l) Observations of any abnormal variations in tailings pond elevations in Cells 1, 3,
and 4A.

m) Locations of slurry and SX discharge within the active cells. Slurry and SX
discharge points need to be indicated on the tailings cells map included in the
Daily Inspection Data form.

n) An estimate of flow for active tailings slurry and SX line(s).

o) An estimate of flow in the solution return line(s).

p) Daily measurements in the leak detection system (LDS) sumps of the tailings
cells will be made when warranted by changes in the solution level of the
respective leak detection system.

The trigger for further action when evaluating the measurements in the Cell 1 and
Cell 3 leak detection systems is a gain of more than 12 inches in 24 hours. The
solution level in Cell 4A leak detection is not allowed to be more than 1.0 foot
above the lowest point on the bottom flexible membrane liner (elevation 5556.14
feet amsl). If any of these observations are made, the Mill Manager should be
notified immediately and the leak detection system pump started. In addition, the
requirement to notify the Executive Secretary in accordance with Parts I.D.6 and
I.G.3 of the Groundwater Discharge Permit must be adhered to when the solution
level trigger for Cell 4A has been exceeded.
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 4 of 48

Whenever the leak detection system pump is operating and the flow meter
totalizer is recording, a notation of the date and the time will be recorded on the
Daily Inspection Data form. This data will be used in accordance with License
Condition 11.3.B through 11.3.E of the Mill’s Radioactive Materials License, to
determine whether or not the flow rate into the leak detection system is in excess
of the License Conditions.

q) An estimate of the percentage of the tailings beach surface area and solution pool
area is made, including estimates of solutions, cover areas, and tailings sands for
Cells 3 and 4A.

Items (a), (m), (n), and (o) are to be done only when the Mill is operating. When the Mill is down,
these items cannot be performed.

2.2. Daily Operations Inspection

During Mill operation, the Shift Foreman, or other person with the training specified in Section 2.4
below, designated by the Radiation Safety Officer, will perform an inspection of the tailings line and
tailings area at least once per shift, paying close attention for potential leaks and to the discharges
from the pipelines. Observations by the Inspector will be recorded on the appropriate line on the
Operating Foreman’s Daily Inspection form.

2.3. Daily Operations Patrol

In addition to the inspections described in Sections 2.1 and 2.2 above, a Mill employee will patrol
the tailings area at least twice per shift during Mill operations to ensure that there are no obvious
safety or operational issues, such as leaking pipes or unusual wildlife activity or incidences.

No record of these patrols need be made, but the inspectors will notify the Radiation Safety Officer
and/or Mill management in the event that during their inspection they discover that an abnormal
condition or tailings emergency has occurred.

2.4. Training

All individuals performing inspections described in Sections 2.1 and 2.2 above must have Tailings
Management System training as set out in the Tailings Inspection Training procedure, which is
attached as Appendix B. This training will include a training pack explaining the procedure for
performing the inspection and addressing inspection items to be observed. In addition, each
individual, after reviewing the training pack, will sign a certification form, indicating that training
has been received relative to his/her duties as an inspector.

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 5 of 48

2.5. Tailings Emergencies

Inspectors will notify the Radiation Safety Officer and/or Mill management immediately if, during
their inspection, they discover that an abnormal condition exists or an event has occurred that could
cause a tailings emergency. Until relieved by the Environmental or Radiation Technician or
Radiation Safety Officer, inspectors will have the authority to direct resources during tailings
emergencies.

Any major catastrophic events or conditions pertaining to the tailings area should be reported
immediately to the Mill Manager or the Radiation Safety Officer, one of whom will notify Corporate
Management. If dam failure occurs, notify your supervisor and the Mill Manager immediately. The
Mill Manager will then notify Corporate Management, MSHA (303-231-5465), and the State of
Utah, Division of Dam Safety (801-538-7200).

3. WEEKLY TAILINGS AND DMT INSPECTION

3.1. Weekly Tailings Inspections

Weekly tailings inspections are to be conducted by the Radiation Safety Department and include the
following:

a) Leak Detection Systems

Each tailings cell's leak detection system shall be checked weekly to determine
whether it is wet or dry. If marked wet, the liquid levels need to be measured and
reported. In Cell 1 and Cell 3 the leak detection system is measured by use of a
pipe that is removed from the system which will indicate the presence of
solutions in the LDS system. The Cell 4A leak detection system is monitored on
a continuous basis by use of a pressure transducer that feeds water level
information to an electronic data collector. The pressure transducer is calibrated
for fluid with a specific gravity of 1.0. The water levels are measured every hour
and the information is stored for later retrieval. The water levels are measured to
the nearest 0.10 inch. The data collector is currently programmed to store 7 days
of water level information. The number of days of stored data can be increased
beyond 7 days if needed. The water level data is downloaded to a laptop
computer on a weekly basis and incorporated into the Mill’s environmental
monitoring data base, and into the files for weekly inspection reports of the
tailings cell leak detection systems
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 6 of 48

If sufficient fluid is present in the leak detection system of any cell, the fluid shall
be pumped from the LDS, to the extent reasonably possible, and record the
volume of fluid recovered. Any fluid pumped from an LDA shall be returned to a
disposal cell.

If fluid is pumped from an LDS, the flow rate shall be calculated by dividing the
recorded volume of fluid recovered by the elapsed time since fluid was last
pumped or increases in the LDS fluid levels were recorded, whichever is the
more recent. This calculation shall be documented as part of the weekly
inspection.

Upon the initial pumping of fluid from an LDS, a fluid sample shall be collected
and analyzed in accordance with paragraph 11.3 C. of the Radioactive Materials
License.

For Cell 4A, under no circumstance shall fluid head in the leak detection
system sump exceed a 1-foot level above the lowest point in the lower flexible
membrane liner. To determine the Maximum Allowable Daily LDS Flow
Rates in the Cell 4A leak detection system, the total volume of all fluids
pumped from the LDS on a weekly basis shall be recovered from the data
collector, and that information will be used to calculate an average volume
pumped per day. Under no circumstances shall the daily LDS flow volume
exceed 24,160 gallons/day. The maximum daily LDS flow volume will be
compared against the measured cell solution levels detailed on Table 1 in
Appendix E, to determine the maximum daily allowable LDS flow volume for
varying head conditions in Cell 4A.

b) Slimes Drain Water Level Monitoring

(i) Cell 3 is an active tailings cell while Cell 2 is partially reclaimed with approximately
90% of the surface covered by platform fill. Each cell has a slimes drain system
which aids in dewatering the slimes and sands placed in the cell;
(ii) Cell 2 has a pump placed inside of the slimes drain access pipe at the bottom of the
slimes drain. As taken from actual measurements, the bottom of the slimes drain is
38 feet below a water level measuring point at the centerline of the slimes drain
access pipe, at the ground surface level. This means that the bottom of the slimes
drain pool and the location of the pump are one foot above the lowest point of the
FML in Cell 2, which, based on construction reports, is at a depth of 39 feet below
the water level measuring point on the slimes drain access pipe for Cell 2;
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 7 of 48

(iii)The slimes drain pump in Cell 2 is activated and deactivated by a float mechanism
and water level probe system. When the water level reaches the level of the float
mechanism the pump is activated. Pumping then occurs until the water level reaches
the lower probe which turns the pump off. The lower probe is located one foot above
the bottom of the slimes drain standpipe, and the float valve is located at five feet
above the bottom of the slimes drain standpipe. The average wastewater head in the
Cell 2 slimes drain is therefore less than 5 feetand is below the phreatic surface of
tailings Cell 2, about 20 feet below the water level measuring point on the slimes
drain access pipe. As a result, there is a continuous flow of wastewater from Cell 2
into the slimes drain collection system. Mill management considers that the average
allowable wastewater head in the Cell 2 slimes drain resulting from pumping in this
manner is satisfactory and is as low as reasonably achievable.
(iv) The Cell 2 slimes drain pump is checked weekly to observe that it is operating and
that the water level probe and float mechanism are working properly, which is noted
on the Weekly Tailings Inspection Form. If at any time the pump is observed to be
not working properly, it will be fixed or replaced within 15 days;
(v) Depth to wastewater in the Cell 2 slimes drain access pipe shall be monitored and
recorded weekly to determine maximum and minimum fluid head before and after a
pumping cycle, respectively. All head measurements must be made from the same
measuring point (the notch at the north side of the access pipe), and made to the
nearest 0.01 foot. The results will be recorded as depth-in-pipe measurements on the
Weekly Tailings Inspection Form;
(vi) On a monthly basis, the slimes drain pump will be turned off and the wastewater in
the slimes drain access pipe will be allowed to stabilize for at least 90 hours. Once
the water level has stabilized (based on no change in water level for three (3)
successive readings taken no less than one (1) hour apart) the water level of the
wastewater will be measured and recorded as a depth-in-pipe measurement on the
Monthly Inspection Data form, by measuring the depth to water below the water level
measuring point on the slimes drain access pipe;
(vii) No process liquids shall be allowed to be discharged into Cell 2;
(viii) If at any time the most recent average annual head in the Cell 2 slimes drain is
found to have increased above the average head for the previous calendar year, the
Licensee will comply with the requirements of Part I.G.3 of the GWDP, including the
requirement to provide notification to the Executive Secretary orally within 24 hours
followed by written notification;
(ix) Because Cell 3 and Cell 4A are currently active, no pumping from the Cell 3 or Cell
4A slimes drain is authorized. Prior to initiation of tailings dewatering operations for
Cell 3 or Cell 4A, a similar procedure will be developed for ensuring that average
head elevations in the Cell 3 and Cell 4A slimes drains are kept as low as reasonably
achievable, and that the Cell 3 and Cell 4A slimes drains are inspected and the results
reported in accordance with the requirements of the permit.”

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 8 of 48

c) Wind Movement of Tailings

An evaluation of wind movement of tailings or dusting and control measures
shall be taken if needed.

d) Tailings Wastewater Pool Elevation Monitoring

Solution elevation measurements in Cells 1and 4A and Roberts Pond are to be taken by
survey on a weekly basis, and the beac area in Cell 4A with the maximum elevation is to be
taken by survey on a monthly basis, as follows:

(i) The survey will be performed by the Mill’s Radiation Safety Officer or designee
(the “Surveyor”) with the assistance of another Mill worker (the “Assistant”);
(ii) The survey will be performed using a survey instrument (the “Survey Instrument”)
accurate to 0.01 feet, such as a Sokkai No. B21, or equivalent, together with a
survey rod (the “Survey Rod”) having a visible scale in 0.01 foot increments;
(iii)The reference Points (the “Reference Points”) for Cells 1and 4A, and Roberts
Pond are known points established by professional survey. For Cell 1 and Roberts
Pond, the Reference Point is a wooden stake with a metal disk on it located on the
southeast corner of Cell 1. The elevation of the metal disk (the “Reference Point
Elevation”) for Cell 1 and Roberts Pond is at 5,623.14 feet above mean sea level
(“FMSL”). For Cell 3 and cell 4A, the Reference Point is a piece of metal rebar
located on the south dike of Cell 3. The elevation at the top of this piece of rebar
(the Reference Point Elevation for Cell 4A) is at 5,607.83 FMSL;
(iv) The Surveyor will set up the Survey Instrument in a location where both the
applicable Reference Point and pond surface are visible. For Cell 1 and Roberts
Pond, this is typically on the road on the Cell 1 south dike between Cell 1 and
Roberts Pond, approximately 100 feet east of the Cell 1/Roberts Pond Reference
Point. For Cell 4A, this is typically on the road on the Cell 3 dike approximately
100 feet east of the Cell 3 Reference Point;
(v) Once in location, the Surveyor will ensure that the Survey Instrument is level by
centering the bubble in the level gauge on the Survey Instrument;
(vi) The Assistant will place the Survey Rod vertically on the Reference Point (on the
metal disk on the Cell 1/Roberts Pond Reference Point and on the top of the rebar
on the Cell 4A Reference Point. The Assistant will ensure that the Survey Rod is
vertical by gently rocking the rod back and forth until the Surveyor has established
a level reading;
(vii) The Surveyor will focus the cross hairs of the Survey Instrument on the scale on
the Survey Rod, and record the number (the “Reference Point Reading”), which
represents the number of feet the Survey Instrument is reading above the
Reference Point;
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 9 of 48

(viii) The Assistant will then move to a designated location where the Survey Rod can
be placed on the surface of the main solution pond in the Cell 1, Cell 4A or
Roberts Pond, or the area of the beach in Cell 4A with the highest elevation, as the
case may be. These designated locations, and the methods to be used by the
Assistant to consistently use the same locations are as follows:

A. Pond Surface Measurements
I. Cell 4A

The Assistant will walk down the slope in the northeast corner of Cell 4A and
place the Survey Rod at the liquid level.

II. Cell 1

A mark has been painted on the north side of the ramp going to the pump
platform in Cell 1. The Assistant will place the Survey Rod against that mark
and hold the rod vertically, with one end just touching the liquid surface; and

III Roberts Pond

A mark has been painted on the railing of the pump stand in Roberts Pond. The
Assistant will place the Survey Rod against that mark and hold the rod
vertically, with one end just touching the liquid surface.

Based on the foregoing methods, the approximate coordinate locations for the
measuring points for Roberts Pond and the Cells are:

Northing Easting
Roberts Pond 323,041 2,579,697
Cell 1 322,196 2,579,277
Cell 4A 320,300 2,579,360

These coordinate locations may vary somewhat depending on solution elevations
in the Pond and Cells;

B. Cell 4A Beach Elevation

The Assistant will place the Survey Rod at the point on the beach area of Cell 4A
that has the highest elevation. If it is not clear which area of the beach has the
highest elevation, then multiple points on the beach area will be surveyed until the
Surveyor is satisfied that the point on the Cell 4A beach area with the highest
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 10 of 48

elevation has been surveyed. If it is clear that all points on the Cell 4A beach area
are below 5,593 FMSL, then the Surveyor may rely on one survey point;

(ix) The Assistant will hold the Survey Rod vertically with one end of the Survey Rod
just touching the pond surface. The Assistant will ensure that the Survey Rod is
vertical by gently rocking the rod back and forth until the Surveyor has established
a level reading;
(x) The Surveyor will focus the cross hairs of the Survey Instrument on the scale on
the Survey Rod, and record the number (the “Pond Surface Reading”), which
represents the number of feet the Survey Instrument is reading above the pond
surface level.

The Surveyor will calculate the elevation of the pond surface as FSML by adding the
Reference Point Reading for the Cell or Roberts Pond, as the case may be, to the Reference
Point Elevation for the Cell or Roberts Pond and subtracting the Pond Surface Reading for
the Cell or Roberts Pond, and will record the number accurate to 0.01 feet.
e) Decontamination Pads

(i) New Decontamination Pad
The New Decontamination Pad is located in the southeast corner of the ore
pad, near the Mill’s scale house.
A. In order to ensure that the primary containment of the New
Decontamination Pad water collection system has not been
compromised, and to provide an inspection capability to detect
leakage from the primary containment, vertical inspection portals
have been installed between the primary and secondary containments;

B. These portals will be visually observed on a weekly basis as a means
of detecting any leakage from the primary containment into the void
between the primary and secondary containment. The depth to water
in each portal will be measured weekly, by physically measuring the
depth to water with an electrical sounding tape/device. All
measurements must be made from the same measuring point and be
made to the nearest 0.01 foot;
C. These inspections will be recorded on the Weekly Tailings Inspection
form;

D. The water level shall not exceed 0.10 foot above the concrete floor in
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 11 of 48

any standpipe, at any time. This will be determined by subtracting the
weekly depth to water measurement from the distance from the
measuring point in the standpipe to the dry concrete floor;

E. Any observation of fluid between the primary and secondary
containments will be reported to the Radiation Safety Officer (RSO).

F. In addition to inspection of the water levels in the standpipes, the
New Decontamination Pad, including the concrete integrity of the
exposed surfaces of the pad, will be inspected on a weekly basis.
Observations will be made of the current condition of the New
Decontamination Pad. Any abnormalities relating to the pad and any
damage to the concrete wash surface of the pad will be noted on the
Weekly Tailings Inspection form. If there are any cracks greater than
1/8 inch separation (width), the RSO must be contacted. The RSO
will have the responsibility to cease activities and have the cracks
repaired.

(ii) Existing Decontamination Pad

The Existing Decontamination Pad is located between the northwest corner of the
Mill’s maintenance shop and the ore feeding grizzly.

A. The Existing Decontamination Pad will be inspected on a weekly
basis. Observations will be made of the current condition of the
Existing Decontamination Pad, including the concrete integrity of the
exposed surfaces of the pad. Any abnormalities relating to the pad
and any damage or cracks on the concrete wash surface of the pad
will be noted on the Weekly Tailings Inspection form. If there are
any cracks greater than 1/8 inch separation (width), the RSO must be
contacted. The RSO will have the responsibility to cease activities
and have the cracks repaired.

f) Summary

In addition, the weekly inspection should summarize all activities concerning the
tailings area for that particular week.

Results of the weekly tailings inspection are recorded on the Weekly Tailings and DMT Inspection
form. An example of the Weekly Tailings and DMT Inspection form is provided in Appendix A.

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 12 of 48

3.2. Weekly Inspection of Solution Levels in Roberts Pond

On a weekly basis, solution elevations are taken on Roberts Pond, in accordance with the procedures
set out in Section 3.1 d) above. The Weekly solution level in Roberts Pond is recorded on the
Weekly Tailings and DMT Inspection form. Based on historical observations, the FML at the Pond
Surface Reading area for Roberts Pond, is approximately six inches above the lowest point on the
pond’s FML. If the pond solution elevation at the Pond Surface Reading area is at or below the FML
for that area, the pond will be recorded as being dry.

3.3. Weekly Feedstock Storage Area Inspections

Weekly feedstock storage area inspections will be performed by the Radiation Safety Department to
confirm that:

a) the bulk feedstock materials are stored and maintained within the defined area described in
the GWDP, as indicated on the map attached hereto as Appendix D;

b) a 4 ft. buffer is maintained at the periphery of the storage area which is absent bulk material
in order to assure that the materials do not encroach upon the boundary of the storage area;
and

c) all alternate feedstock located outside the defined Feedstock Area are maintained within
water tight containers.

The results of this inspection will be recorded on the Ore Storage/Sample Plant Weekly Inspection
Report, a copy of which is contained in Appendix A. Any variance in stored materials from this
requirement or observed leaking alternate feedstock drums or other containers will be brought to the
attention of Mill Management and rectified within 15 days.

4. MONTHLY TAILINGS INSPECTION

Monthly tailings inspections will be performed by the Radiation Safety Officer or his designee from
the Radiation Safety Department and recorded on the Monthly Inspection Data form, an example of
which is contained in Appendix A. Monthly inspections are to be performed no sooner than 14 days
since the last monthly tailings inspection and can be conducted concurrently with the quarterly
tailings inspection when applicable. The following items are to be inspected:

a) Tailings Slurry Pipeline

When the Mill is operating, the slurry pipeline will be inspected at key locations to
determine pipe wear. Pipe thickness will be measured using an ultrasonic device by
either the radiation safety staff or other trained designees. The critical points of the
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 13 of 48

pipe include bends, slope changes, valves, and junctions, which are critical to dike
stability. These locations to be monitored will be determined by the Radiation Safety
Officer or his designee from the Radiation Safety Department during the Mill run.

b) Diversion Ditches

Diversion ditches 1, 2 and 3 shall be monitored monthly for sloughing, erosion,
undesirable vegetation, and obstruction of flow. Diversion berm 2 should be checked
for stability and signs of distress.

c) Sedimentation Pond

Activities around the Mill and facilities area sedimentation pond shall be summarized
for the month.

d) Overspray Dust Minimization

The inspection shall include an evaluation of overspray minimization, if applicable.
This entails ensuring that the overspray system is functioning properly. In the event
that overspray is carried more than 50 feet from the cell, the overspray system should
be immediately shut-off.

e) Remarks

A section is included on the Monthly Inspection Data form for remarks in which
recommendations can be made or observations of concern can be documented.

f) Summary of Daily, Weekly and Quarterly Inspections

The monthly inspection will also summarize the daily, weekly and, if applicable,
quarterly tailings inspections for the specific month.

In addition, settlement monitors are typically surveyed monthly and the results reported on the
Monthly Inspection Data form.

5. QUARTERLY TAILINGS INSPECTION

The quarterly tailings inspection is performed by the Radiation Safety Officer or his designee from
the Radiation Safety Department, having the training specified in Section 2.4 above, once per
calendar quarter. A quarterly inspection should be performed no sooner than 45 days since the
previous quarterly inspection was performed.

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 14 of 48

Each quarterly inspection shall include an Embankment Inspection, an Operations/Maintenance
Review, a Construction Review and a Summary, as follows:

a) Embankment Inspection

The Embankment inspection involves a visual inspection of the crest, slope and toe
of each dike for movement, seepage, severe erosion, subsidence, shrinkage cracks,
and exposed liner.

b) Operations/Maintenance Review

The Operations/Maintenance Review consists of reviewing Operations and
Maintenance activities pertaining to the tailings area on a quarterly basis.

c) Construction Review

The Construction Review consists of reviewing any construction changes or
modifications made to the tailings area on a quarterly basis.
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 15 of 48

d) Summary

The summary will include all major activities or observations noted around the
tailings area on a quarterly basis.

If any of these conditions are noted, the conditions and corrective measures taken should be
documented in the Quarterly Inspection Data form. An example of the Quarterly Inspection Data
form is provided in Appendix A.

6. ANNUAL EVALUATIONS

The following annual evaluations shall be performed:

6.1. Annual Technical Evaluation

An annual technical evaluation of the tailings management system is performed by a registered
professional engineer (PE), who has experience and training in the area of geotechnical aspects of
retention structures. The technical evaluation includes an on-site inspection of the tailings
management system and a thorough review of all tailings records for the past year. The Technical
Evaluation also includes a review and summary of the annual movement monitor survey (see Section
5.2 below).

All tailings cells and corresponding dikes will be inspected for signs of erosion, subsidence,
shrinkage, and seepage. The drainage ditches will be inspected to evaluate surface water control
structures.

In the event tailings capacity evaluations (as per SOP PBL-3) were performed for the receipt of
alternate feed material during the year, the capacity evaluation forms and associated calculation
sheets will be reviewed to ensure that the maximum tailings capacity estimate is accurate. The
amount of tailings added to the system since the last evaluation will also be calculated to determine
the estimated capacity at the time of the evaluation.

Tailings inspection records will consist of daily, weekly, monthly, and quarterly tailings inspections.
These inspection records will be evaluated to determine if any freeboard limits are being
approached. Records will also be reviewed to summarize observations of potential concern. The
evaluation also involves discussion with the Environmental and/or Radiation Technician and the
Radiation Safety Officer regarding activities around the tailings area for the past year. During the
annual inspection, photographs of the tailings area will be taken. The training of individuals will be
reviewed as a part of the Annual Technical Evaluation.

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 16 of 48

The registered engineer will obtain copies of selected tailings inspections, along with the monthly
and quarterly summaries of observations of concern and the corrective actions taken. These copies
will then be included in the Annual Technical Evaluation Report.

The Annual Technical Evaluation Report must be submitted by November 15th of every year to:

Directing Dam Safety Engineer
State of Utah, Natural Resources
1636 West North Temple, Suite 220
Salt Lake City, Utah 84116-3156

6.2. Movement Monitors

A movement monitor survey is to be conducted by a licensed surveyor annually during the second
quarter of each year. The movement monitor survey consists of surveying monitors along dikes 3-S,
4A-W, and 4A-S to detect any possible settlement or movement of the dikes. The data generated
from this survey is reviewed and incorporated into the Annual Technical Evaluation Report of the
tailings management system.

6.3. Freeboard Limits

The freeboard limits set out in this Section are intended to capture the Local 6-hour Probable
Maximum Precipitation (PMP) event, which was determined in the January 10, 1990 Drainage
Report (the “Drainage Report”) for the White Mesa site to be 10 inches.

The flood volume from the PMP event over the Cell 1 pond area plus the adjacent drainage areas,
was calculated in the Drainage Report to be 103 acre feet of water, with a wave run up factor of
0.90 feet.

The flood volume from the PMP event over the Cell 2 and Cell 3 pond areas, plus the adjacent
drainage areas was calculated in the Drainage Report to be 123.4 acre-feet of water.

The flood volume from the PMP event over the Cell 4A area was calculated in the Drainage
Report to be 36 acre-feet of water (40 acres, plus the adjacent drainage area of 3.25 acres, times
the PMP of 10 inches), with a wave run up factor of 0.77 feet.

The total pool surface area in Cell 1 is 52.9 acres and in Cell 4A is 40 acres. The top of the
flexible membrane liner (“FML”) for Cell 1 is 5,618.2 FMSL and for Cell 4A is 5,598.5 FMSL.
Based on the foregoing, the freeboard limits for the Mill’s tailings cells will be set as follows:

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 17 of 48

6.3.1. Cell 1
The freeboard limit for Cell 1 will be set at 5,615.4 FMSL. This will allow Cell 1 to capture all of the PMP volume associated with Cell 1. The total volume requirement for Cell 1 is 103 acre feet divided by 52.9 acres equals 1.95 feet, plus the wave run up factor of 0.90 feet equals 2.85 feet. The freeboard limit is then 5,618.2 FMSL minus 2.85 feet equals 5,615.4 FMSL. Under Radioactive Materials License condition 10.3, this freeboard limit is set and is not recalculated annually.
6.3.2. Cell 2

The freeboard limit for Cell 2 is inapplicable, since Cell 2 is filled with solids. All of the PMP
volume associated with Cell 2 will be attributed to Cell 4A (and/or any future tailings cells).
6.3.3. Cell 3 The freeboard limit for Cell 3 is inapplicable, since Cell 3 is close to being filled with solids, and all of the PMP flood volume associated with Cell 3 will be attributed to Cell 4A (and/or any future tailings cells).
6.3.4. Cell 4A
The freeboard limit for Cell 4A will be set assuming that the total PMP volume for Cells 2, 3 and 4A of 159.4 acre feet will be accommodated in Cell 4A. The procedure for calculating the freeboard limit for Cell 4A is as follows: (a) When the Pool Surface Area is 40 Acres When the pool surface area in Cell 4A is 40 acres (i.e., when there are no beaches), the freeboard limit for Cell 4A will be 5,593.7 FMSL, which is 4.76 feet below the FML (being the quotient of 159.4 acre feet divided by 40 acres, which equals 3.99 feet, plus the wave run up factor for Cell 4A of 0.77 feet, rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a foot); (b) When the Maximum Elevation of the Beach Area is 5,593 FMSL or Less When the maximum elevation of the beach area in Cell 4A is 5593 FMSL or less, then the freeboard limit will be 5,593.7 FMSL, which is the same as in (a) above. This allows for the situation where there may be beaches, but these beaches are at a lower elevation than the freeboard limit established in (a) above, and there is therefore ample freeboard above the beaches to hold the maximum PMP volume. The maximum elevation of the beach area will be determined by monthly surveys performed by Mill personnel in accordance with the Mill’s DMT Plan. (c) When the Maximum Elevation of the Beach Area First Exceeds 5,593 FMSL When the maximum elevation of the beach area in Cell 4A first exceeds 5,593 FMSL, then the freeboard limit for the remainder of the ensuing year (period t=0) (until the next November 1) will be calculated when that elevation is first exceeded (the “Initial Calculation Date”), as follows:
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 18 of 48

i) The total number of dry tons of tailings that have historically been deposited into Cell 4A prior to the Initial Calculation Date (“T0”) will be determined; ii) The expected number of dry tons to be deposited into Cell 4A for the remainder of the ensuing year (up to the next November 1), based on production estimates for that period (“Δ0*”), will be determined; iii) Δ0* will be grossed up by a safety factor of 150% to allow for a potential underestimation of the number of tons that will be deposited in the cell during the remainder of the ensuing year. This grossed up number can be referred to as the “modeled tonnage” for the period; iv) The total design tailings solid storage capacity of Cell 4A will be accepted as 2,094,000 dry tons of tailings; v) The available remaining space in Cell 4A for solids as at the Initial Calculation Date will be calculated as 2,094,000 dry tons minus T0; vi) The reduction in the pool surface area for the remainder of the ensuing year will be assumed to be directly proportional to the reduction in the available space in Cell 4A for solids. That is, the reduced pool surface area for period t=0 (“RPA0”), after the reduction, will be calculated to be: (1 – (Δ0* x 1.5) / (2,094,000 - T0)) x 40 acres = RPA0
vii) The required freeboard for Cell 4A for the remainder of the period t=0 can be calculated in feet to be the wave run up factor for Cell 4A of 0.77 feet plus the quotient of 159.4 acre feet divided by the RPA0. The freeboard limit for Cell 4A for the remainder of period t=0 would then be the elevation of the FML for Cell 4A of 5598.5 FMSL less this required freeboard amount, rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a foot; and viii) The foregoing calculations will be performed at the Initial Calculation Date and the resulting freeboard limit will persist until the next November 1. An example of this calculation is set out in Appendix F. (d) Annual Freeboard Calculation When the Maximum Elevation of the Beach Area Exceeds 5,593 FMSL On November 1 of each year (the “Annual Calculation Date”), the reduction in pool area for the ensuing year (referred to as period t) will be calculated by: i) First, calculating the Adjusted Reduced Pool Area for the previous period (ARPAt-1) to reflect actual tonnages deposited in Cell 4A for the previous period (period t-1). The RPAt-1 used for the previous period was based on expected tonnages for period t-1, grossed up by a safety factor. The ARPAt-1 is merely the RPA that would have been used for period t-1 had the actual tonnages for year t-1 been known at the outset of period t-1 and had the RPA been calculated based on the actual tonnages for period t-1. This allows the freeboard calculations to be corrected each year to take into account actual tonnages deposited in the cell as of the date of the calculation. The ARPAt-1 can be calculated using the following formula:
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 19 of 48

(1 – Δt-1 / (2,094,000 – Tt-1)) x ARPAt-2 = ARPAt-1
Where: • Δt-1 is the actual number of dry tons of tailings solids deposited in Cell 4A during period t-1; • Tt-1 is the actual number of dry tons of tailings solids historically deposited in Cell 4A prior to the beginning of period t-1; and
• ARPAt-2 is the Adjusted Reduced Pool Area for period t-2. If period t-2 started at the Initial Calculation Date, then ARPAt-2 is 40 acres; ii) Once the ARPAt-1 for the previous period (period t-1) has been calculated, the RPA for the subject period (period t) can be calculated as follows: (1 – (Δt* x 1.5) / (2,094,000 - Tt)) x ARPAt-1 = RPAt Where:
• Δt* is the expected number of dry tons of tailings to be deposited into Cell 4A for the ensuing year (period t), based on production estimates for the year (as can be seen from the foregoing formula, this expected number is grossed up by a safety factor of 1.5); • Tt is the actual number of dry tons of tailings solids historically deposited in Cell 4A prior to the beginning of period t; and
• ARPAt-1 is the Adjusted Reduced Pool Area for period t-1, which is the pool surface area for the previous period (period t-1) that should have applied during that period, had modeled tonnages (i.e., expected tonnages grossed up by the 150% safety factor) equaled actual tonnages for the period; iii) The required freeboard for period t can be calculated in feet to be the wave run up factor for Cell 4A of 0.77 feet plus the quotient of 159.4 acre feet divided by the RPAt. The freeboard limit for Cell 4A for period t would then be the elevation of the FML for Cell 4A of 5598.5 FMSL less this required freeboard amount, rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a foot; and iv) The foregoing calculations will be performed at the Annual Calculation Date for period t and the resulting freeboard limit will persist until the next Annual Calculation Date for period t+1. An example of this calculation is set out in Appendix F. (e) When a Spillway is Added to Cell 4A that Allows Overflow Into a New Tailings Cell
When a spillway is added between Cell 4A and a new tailings cell (Cell 4B), then, if an approved
freeboard limit calculation method for the new cell is set to cover the entire PMP event for Cells 2, 3,
4A and 4B, the freeboard limit for Cell 4A will be inapplicable, except for approved provisions to
prevent storm water runoff from overtopping dikes.
6.3.5. Roberts Pond
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 20 of 48

The freeboard limit for Roberts Pond is a liquid maximum elevation of 5,624.0 feet above mean sea
level, as specified in the GWDP.

6.4. Annual Leak Detection Fluid Samples

In the event solution has been detected in a leak detection system, a sample will be collected on an
annual basis. This sample will be analyzed according to the conditions set forth in License
Condition 11.3.C. The results of the analysis will be reviewed to determine the origin of the
solution.

6.5. Annual Inspection of the Decontamination Pads

a) New Decontamination Pad

During the second quarter of each year, the New Decontamination Pad will be taken out of service
and inspected to ensure the integrity of the wash pad’s exposed concrete surface. If any
abnormalities are identified, i.e. cracks in the concrete with greater than 1/8 inch separation (width)
or any significant deterioration or damage of the pad surface, repairs will be made prior to resuming
the use of the facility. All inspection findings and any repairs required shall be documented on the
Annual Decontamination Pad Inspection form. The inspection findings, any repairs required and
repairs completed shall be summarized in the 2nd Quarter DMT Monitoring Report due September 1
of each calendar year.

b) Existing Decontamination Pad
During the second quarter of each year, the Existing Decontamination Pad will be taken out of
service and inspected to ensure the integrity of the steel tank. If any abnormalities are identified,
repairs will be made prior to resuming the use of the facility. All inspection findings and any repairs
required shall be documented on the Annual Decontamination Pad Inspection form. The inspection
findings, any repairs required and repairs completed shall be summarized in the 2nd Quarter DMT
Monitoring Report due September 1 of each calendar year.

7. OTHER INSPECTIONS

All daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly and annual inspections and evaluations should be performed as
specified in Sections 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 above. However, additional inspections should be conducted
after any significant storm or significant natural or man-made event occurs.

8. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

In addition to the Daily Inspection Data, Weekly Tailings Inspection, Monthly Inspection Data and
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 21 of 48

Quarterly Inspection Data forms included as Appendix A and described in Sections 2, 3, 4 and 5
respectively, and the Operating Foreman’s Daily Inspection and Weekly Mill Inspection forms
described in Sections 2 and 3, respectively, the following additional reports shall also be prepared:

8.1. Monthly Tailings Reports

Monthly tailings reports are prepared every month and summarize the previous month's activities
around the tailings area. If not prepared by the Radiation Safety Officer, the report shall be
submitted to the Radiation Safety Officer for review. The Mill Manager will review the report as
well before the report is filed in the Mill Central File. The report will contain a summary of
observations of concern noted on the daily and weekly tailings inspections. Corrective measures
taken during the month will be documented along with the observations where appropriate. All daily
and weekly tailings inspection forms will be attached to the report. A monthly inspection form will
also be attached. Quarterly inspection forms will accompany the report when applicable. The report
will be signed and dated by the preparer in addition to the Radiation Safety Officer and the Mill
Manager.

8.2. DMT Reports

Quarterly reports of DMT monitoring activities, which will include the following information, will
be provided to the Executive Secretary on the schedule provided in Table 5 of the GWDP:

a) On a quarterly basis, all required information required by Part 1.F.2 of the GWDP
relating to the inspections described in Section 3.1(b) (Slimes Drain Water Level
Monitoring), 3.1(d) (Tailings Wastewater Pool and Beach Area Elevation
Monitoring), 3.2 (Weekly Inspection of Solution Levels in Roberts Pond) and 3.3
(Weekly Feedstock Storage Area Inspections);

b) On a quarterly basis, a summary of the daily water level (depth) inspections for
the quarter for the presence of fluid in all three vertical inspection portals for each
of the three chambers in the concrete settling tank system for the New
Decontamination Pad, which will include a table indicating the water level
measurements in each portal during the quarter;

c) With respect to the annual inspection of the New Decontamination Pad described
in Section 6.5(a), the inspection findings, any repairs required, and repairs
completed shall be summarized in the 2nd Quarter report, due September 1 of
each calendar year;

d) With respect to the annual inspection of the Existing Decontamination Pad
described in Section 6.5(b), the inspection findings, any repairs required, and
repairs completed shall be summarized in the 2nd Quarter report, due September 1
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 22 of 48

of each calendar year; and

e) An annual summary and graph for each calendar year of the depth to wastewater
in the Cell 2 slimes drain must be included in the fourth quarter report. After the
first year, and beginning in 2008, quarterly reports shall include both the current
year monthly values and a graphic comparison to the previous year.

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 23 of 48

APPENDIX A

FORMS

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 24 of 48

APPENDIX A (CONT.)
DAILY INSPECTION DATA

Inspector:________________ Date;___________________
Accompanied by:_________
Time:___________________

Any Item not “OK” must be documented. A check mark = OK, X = Action Required
I. TAILINGS SLURRY TRANSPORT SYSTEM
Inspection Items Conditions of Potential Concern Cell 1 Cell 2 Cell 3 Cell 4A

Slurry Pipeline Leaks, Damage, Blockage, Sharp Bends
Pipeline Joints Leaks, Loose Connections
Pipeline Supports Damage, Loss of Support
Valves Leaks, Blocked, Closed
Point(s) of Discharge Improper Location or Orientation

II. OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS
Inspection Items Conditions of Potential Concern Cell 1 Cell 2 Cell 3 Cell 4A

Water Level Greater Than Operating Level, Large Change
Since Previous Inspection

Beach Cracks, Severe Erosion, Subsidence
Liner and Cover Erosion of cover, Exposure of Liner

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 25 of 48

III. DIKES AND EMBANKMENTS
Inspection Items Conditions of Potential Concern Dike 1-I Dike 1-1A Dike 2 Dike 3 Dike 4A-S Dike 4A-W

Slopes Sloughs or Sliding Cracks, Bulges, Subsidence,
Severe Erosion, Moist Areas, Areas of Seepage
Outbreak

Crest Cracks, Subsidence, Severe Erosion

IV. FLOW RATES
Slurry Line(s) Pond Return S-X Tails Spray System

GPM

V. PHYSICAL INSPECTION OF SLURRY LINES(S)
Walked to Discharge Point ____________Yes _____________No
Observed Entire Discharge Line ____________Yes _____________No

VI. DUST CONTROL
Cell 2 Cell 3 Cell 4A

Dusting
Wind Movement of Tailings

Precipitation: ______________________ inches liquid

General Meteorological conditions:__________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 26 of 48

VII. DAILY LEAK DETECTION CHECK
Cell 1 Cell 2 Cell 3 Cell 4A

Leak Detection System
Checked
_________Checked

______Wet______Dry

Initial level__________
Final level___________

Gal. pumped_________
_________Checked

______Wet______Dry

Initial level__________
Final level___________

Gal. pumped_________
_________Checked

______Wet______Dry

Initial level__________
Final level___________

Gal. pumped_________
_________Checked

______Wet______Dry

Initial level__________
Final level___________

Gal. pumped_________

VIII OBSERVATIONS OF POTENTIAL CONCERN

Action Required

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 27 of 48

[MAP OF TAILINGS AREA]

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 28 of 48

APPENDIX A (CONT)

DENISON MINES (USA) CORP. WEEKLY TAILINGS INSPECTION
Date:_________________ Inspectors: ______________________________

1. Pond elevations (msl, ft) Cell 1: (a) Pond Solution Elevation ________________

(b) FML Bottom Elevation ______5597______
(c) Depth of Water above FML ((a)-(b)) _______________
Cell 3: (a)Pond Solution Elevation ________________
(b)FML Bottom Elevation ______5570______
(c)Depth of Water above FML ((a)-(b)) _______________
Cell 4A: (a)Pond Solution Elevation _______________
(b)FML Bottom Elevation ______ 5564_____
(c)Depth of Water above FML ((a)-(b)) ______________

Roberts Pond: (a)Pond Solution Elevation _______________
(b)FML Bottom Elevation ______5612.34___
(c)Depth of Water above FML ((a)-(b)) _______________

2. Slimes Drain Liquid Levels Cell 2 Pump functioning properly ________ Pump Timer set at 15min on 45 min off ________

________________Depth to Liquid pre-pump
________________Depth to Liquid Post-pump

(all measurements are depth-in-pipe)
Pre-pump head is 38’-Depth to Liquid Pre-pump =
_______
Post-pump head is 38’ –Depth to Liquid Post-
pump = ______

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 29 of 48

3. Leak Detection Systems

Observation:
Cell 1 Cell 2 Cell 3 Cell 4A

Is LDS wet or dry? _____wet____dry _____wet____dry _____wet____dry _____wet____dry
If wet, Record
liquid level:
_______Ft to
Liquid
_______Ft to
Liquid
_______Ft to
Liquid
_______Ft to
Liquid *
If sufficient fluid is
present, record
volume of fluid
pumped and flow
rate:
Volume _______
Flow Rate______
Volume _______
Flow Rate______
Volume _______
Flow Rate______
Volume _______
Flow Rate______
Was fluid sample
collected?
____yes____no ____yes____no ____yes____no ____yes____no

Observation:
New Decon Pad,
Portal 1
New Decon Pad,
Portal 2
New Decon Pad
Portal 3

Is LDS (Portal)
wet or dry?
_____wet____dry _____wet____dry _____wet____dry
If wet, Record
liquid level:
_______Ft to
Liquid
_______Ft to
Liquid
_______Ft to
Liquid

If wet, Report to
RSO

4. Tailings Area Inspection (Note dispersal of blowing tailings): __________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________

5. Control Methods Implemented:__________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

6. Remarks:__________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________

7. Contaminated Waste Dump:____________________________________________________
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 30 of 48

* Does Level exceed 12 inches above the lowest point on the bottom flexible membrane liner (elevation
5556.14 amsl)? _____ no _____ yes
If Cell 4A leak detection system level exceeds 12 inches above the lowest point on the bottom flexible
membrane liner (elevation 5556.14 amsl), notify supervisor or Mill manager immediately.

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 31 of 48

APPENDIX A (CONT.)

MONTHLY INSPECTION DATA
Inspector: ____________________________
Date: ________________________________

1. Slurry Pipeline: __________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Pipe Thickness:____________(To be measured only during periods when the Mill is operating)
2. Diversion Ditches and Diversion Berm:
Observation:
Diversion Ditch 1 Diversion Ditch 2 Diversion Ditch 3 Diversion Berm 2
Diversion Ditches:
Sloughing _____yes_____no _____yes_____no _____yes_____no Erosion _____yes_____no _____yes_____no _____yes_____no
Undesirable
Vegetation
_____yes_____no _____yes_____no _____yes_____no
Obstruction of Flow _____yes_____no _____yes_____no _____yes_____no

Diversion Berm: Stability Issues _____yes_____no
Signs of Distress _____yes_____no

Comments:__________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________

3. Summary of Activities Around Sedimentation Pond: ____________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 32 of 48

4. Overspray Dust Minimization:

Overspray system functioning properly: _______yes_______no
Overspray carried more than 50 feet from the cell: _____yes______no
If “yes”, was system immediately shut off? _____yes_____no

Comments:__________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________

5. Remarks: ________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________

6. Settlement Monitors Cell 2 W1: ____________ Cell 2W3-S: ____________ Cell 3-1N: _____________
Cell 2 W2: ____________ Cell 2E1-N: ____________ Cell 3-1C: _____________
Cell 2 W3: ____________ Cell 2E1-1S: ____________ Cell 3-1S: _____________
Cell 2 W4: ____________ Cell 2E1-2S: ____________ Cell 3-2N: _____________
Cell 2W7-C: ____________ Cell 2 East: ____________ Cell 2W5-N: ___________ Cell 2 W7N: ____________ Cell 2 W7S: ____________ Cell 2 W6N: ___________
Cell 2 W6C: ____________ Cell 2 W6S: ____________ Cell 2 W4N: ___________
Cell 4A-Toe: ___________ Cell 2 W4S: ____________ Cell 2 W5C: ___________
Cell 3-2C: _____________ Cell 3-2S: _____________ Cell 2 W5S: ___________

7. Summary of Daily, Weekly and Quarterly Inspections: __________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________

8. Monthly Slimes Drain Static Head Measurement for Cell 2 (Depth-in-Pipe Water Level
Reading): __________________

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 33 of 48

APPENDIX A (CONT.)

WHITE MESA MILL
TAILINGS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

QUARTERLY INSPECTION DATA

Inspector: ____________________________

Date: ________________________________

1. Embankment Inspection: ______________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________

2. Operations/Maintenance Review: _______________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________

3. Construction Activities: ____________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________

4. Summary: ___________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 34 of 48

APPENDIX A (CONT.)
ORE STORAGE/SAMPLE PLANT WEEKLY INSPECTION REPORT
Week of _________ through _________ Date of Inspection:_________________

Inspector:_________________________

Weather conditions for the week: ____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________

Blowing dust conditions for the week:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________

Corrective actions needed or taken for the week:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________

Are all bulk feedstock materials stored in the area indicated on the attached diagram:
yes:_______ no:________
comments:_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Are all alternate feedstock materials located outside the area indicated on the attached diagram maintained
within water-tight containers:
yes:_______ no:_______
comments (e.g., conditions of containers):______________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________

Are all sumps and low lying areas free of standing solutions?
Yes: _______ No: _______
If “No”, how was the situation corrected, supervisor contacted and correction date? ____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________

Is there free standing water or water running off of the feedstock stockpiles?
Yes: ______ No: _______
Comments:___________________________________________________________________________
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 35 of 48

____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________
Other comments:
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 36 of 48

APPENDIX A (CONT.)
ANNUAL DECONTAMINATION PAD INSPECTION
Date of Inspection: _________________

Inspector: _________________________

New Decontamination Pad:
Are there any cracks on the wash pad surface greater than 1/8 inch of separation? __Yes ___No

Is there any significant deterioration or damage of the pad surface? ____Yes ____No

Findings: ____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________

Repair Work Required:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________

Existing Decontamination Pad:

Were there any observed problems with the steel tank? ____Yes ____No
Findings:
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Repair Work Required:
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 37 of 48

APPENDIX B

TAILINGS INSPECTOR TRAINING

This document provides the training necessary for qualifying management-designated individuals for
conducting daily tailings inspections. Training information is presented by the Radiation Safety
Officer or designee from the Environmental Department. Daily tailings inspections are conducted in
accordance with the White Mesa Mill Tailings Management System and Discharge Minimization
Technology (DMT) Monitoring Plan. The Radiation Safety Officer or designee from the Radiation
Safety Department is responsible for performing monthly and quarterly tailings inspections. Tailings
inspection forms will be included in the monthly tailings inspection reports, which summarize the
conditions, activities, and areas of concern regarding the tailings areas.

Notifications:
The inspector is required to record whether all inspection items are normal (satisfactory, requiring no
action) or that conditions of potential concern exist (requiring action). A “check” mark indicates no
action required. If conditions of potential concern exist the inspector should mark an “X” in the area
the condition pertains to, note the condition, and specify the corrective action to be taken. If an
observable concern is made, it should be noted on the tailings report until the corrective action is
taken and the concern is remedied. The dates of all corrective actions should be noted on the reports
as well.

Any major catastrophic events or conditions pertaining to the tailings area should be reported
immediately to the Mill Manager or the Radiation Safety Officer, one of whom will notify Corporate
Management. If dam failure occurs, notify your supervisor and the Mill Manager immediately. The
Mill Manager will then notify Corporate Management, MSHA (303-231-5465), and the State of
Utah, Division of Dam Safety (801-538-7200).

Inspections:

All areas of the tailings disposal system are routinely patrolled and visible observations are to be
noted on a daily tailings inspection form. Refer to Appendix A for an example of the daily tailings
inspection form. The inspection form consists of three pages and is summarized as follows:

1. Tailings Slurry Transport System:

The slurry pipeline is to be inspected for leaks, damage, and sharp bends. The pipeline joints
are to be monitored for leaks, and loose connections. The pipeline supports are to be
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 38 of 48

inspected for damage and loss of support. Valves are also to be inspected particularly for
leaks, blocked valves, and closed valves. Points of discharge need to be inspected for
improper location and orientation.

2. Operational Systems:

Operating systems including water levels, beach liners, and covered areas are items to be
inspected and noted on the daily inspection forms. Sudden changes in water levels
previously observed or water levels exceeding the operating level of a pond are potential
areas of concern and should be noted. Beach areas that are observed as having cracks, severe
erosion or cavities are also items that require investigation and notation on daily forms.
Exposed liner or absence of cover from erosion are potential items of concern for ponds and
covered areas. These should also be noted on the daily inspection form.

Cells 1, 3 and 4A solution levels are to be monitored closely for conditions nearing
maximum operating level and for large changes in the water level since the last inspection.
All pumping activities affecting the water level will be documented. In Cells 1 and 3, the
PVC liner needs to be monitored closely for exposed liner, especially after storm events. It is
important to cover exposed liner immediately as exposure to sunlight will cause degradation
of the PVC liner. Small areas of exposed liner should be covered by hand. Large sections of
exposed liner will require the use of heavy equipment

These conditions are considered serious and require immediate action. After these conditions
have been noted to the Radiation Safety Officer, a work order will be written by the
Radiation Safety Officer and turned into the Maintenance Department. All such repairs
should be noted in the report and should contain the start and finish date of the repairs.

3. Dikes and Embankments:
Inspection items include the slopes and the crests of each dike. For slopes, areas of concern
are sloughs or sliding cracks, bulges, subsidence, severe erosion, moist areas, and areas of
seepage outbreak. For crests, areas of concern are cracks, subsidence, and severe erosion.
When any of these conditions are noted, an “X” mark should be placed in the section marked
for that dike.

In addition, the dikes, in particular dikes 3, 4A-S and 4A-W, should be inspected closely for
mice holes and more importantly for prairie dog holes, as the prairie dogs are likely to
burrow in deep, possibly to the liner. If any of these conditions exist, the inspection report
should be marked accordingly.
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 39 of 48

4. Flow Rates:

Presence of all flows in and out of the cells should be noted. Flow rates are to be estimated
in gallons per minute (GPM). Rates need to be determined for slurry lines, pond return, SX-
tails, and the spray system. During non-operational modes, the flow rate column should be
marked as “0”. The same holds true when the spray system is not utilized.

5. Physical Inspection of Slurry Line(s):

A physical inspection of all slurry lines has to be made every 4 hours during operation of the
mill. If possible, the inspection should include observation of the entire discharge line and
discharge spill point into the cell. If “fill to elevation” flags are in place, the tailings and
build-up is to be monitored and controlled so as to not cover the flags.

6. Dust Control:
Dusting and wind movement of tailings should be noted for Cells 2, 3, and 4A. Other
observations to be noted include a brief description of present weather conditions, and a
record of any precipitation received. Any dusting or wind movement of tailings should be
documented. In addition, an estimate should be made for wind speed at the time of the
observed dusting or wind movement of tailings.

The Radiation Safety Department measures precipitation on a daily basis. Daily
measurements should be made as near to 8:00 a.m. as possible every day. Weekend
measurements will be taken by the Shifter as close to 8:00 a.m. as possible. All snow or ice
should be melted before a reading is taken.

7. Observations of Potential Concern:

All observations of concern during the inspection should be noted in this section. Corrective
action should follow each area of concern noted. All work orders issued, contacts, or
notifications made should be noted in this section as well. It is important to document all
these items in order to assure that the tailings management system records are complete and
accurate.

8. Map of Tailings Cells:

The last section of the inspection involves drawing, as accurately as possible, the following
items where applicable.
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 40 of 48

1. Cover area
2. Beach/tailing sands area
3. Solution as it exists
4. Pump lines
5. Activities around tailings cell (i.e. hauling trash to the dump, liner repairs, etc.)
6. Slurry discharge when operating
7. Over spray system when operating

9. Safety Rules:

All safety rules applicable to the mill are applicable when in the tailings area. These rules
meet the required MSHA regulations for the tailings area. Please pay particular notice to the
following rules:

1. The posted speed limit for the tailings area is 15 mph and should not be exceeded.
2. No food or drink is permitted in the area.
3. All personnel entering the tailings area must have access to a two-way radio.
4. Horseplay is not permitted at any time.
5. Only those specifically authorized may operate motor vehicles in the restricted area.
6. When road conditions are muddy or slick, a four-wheel drive vehicle is required in the
area.
7. Any work performed in which there is a danger of falling or slipping in the cell will
require the use of a safety belt or harness with attended life line and an approved life
jacket. A portable eyewash must be present on site as well.
8. Anytime the boat is used to perform any work; an approved life jacket and goggles must
be worn at all times. There must also be an approved safety watch with a two-way hand-
held radio on shore. A portable eyewash must be present on site as well.

10. Preservation of Wildlife:

Every effort should be made to prevent wildlife and domesticated animals from entering the
tailings area. All wildlife observed should be reported on the Wildlife Report Worksheet
during each shift. Waterfowl seen near the tailings cells should be discouraged from landing
by the use of noisemakers.

11. Certification:

Following the review of this document and on-site instruction on the tailings system
inspection program, designated individuals will be certified to perform daily tailings
inspections. The Radiation Safety Officer authorizes certification. Refer to the Certification
Form, Appendix C. This form should be signed and dated only after a thorough review of the
tailings information previously presented. The form will then be signed by the Radiation
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 41 of 48

Safety Officer and filed.

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 42 of 48

APPENDIX C

CERTIFICATION FORM

Date: __________________________

Name: _________________________

I have read the document titled “Tailings Management System, White Mesa Mill Tailings
Inspector Training” and have received on-site instruction at the tailings system. This instruction
included documentation of daily tailings inspections, analysis of potential problems (dike
failures, unusual flows), notification procedures and safety.

____________________________________
Signature

I certify that the above-named person is qualified to perform the daily inspection of the tailings
system at the White Mesa Mill.

____________________________________
Radiation Safety Personnel/ Tailings System
Supervisor

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 43 of 48

APPENDIX D
FEEDSTOCK STORAGE AREA

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 44 of 48

APPENDIX E

TABLES
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 45 of 48

Table 1

Calculated Action leakage Rates
for Various head Conditions
Cell 4A White mesa Mill
Blanding, Utah

Head above Liner System (feet) Calculated Action leakage Rate
( gallons / acre / day )
5 222.04
10 314.01
15 384.58
20 444.08
25 496.50
30 543.88
35 587.46
37 604.01

White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 46 of 48

APPENDIX F
Example of Freeboard Calculations For Cell 4A Assumptions and Factors: o Total PMP volume to be stored in Cell 4A – 159.4 acre feet o Wave runup factor for Cell 4A – 0.77 feet o Total capacity of Cell 4A – 2,094,000 dry tons o Elevation of FML of Cell 4A – 5,598.5 FMSL o Maximum pool surface area of Cell 4A – 40 acres o Total tailings solids deposited into Cell 4A at time beach area first exceeds 5,593 FMSL – 1,000,000 dry tons* o Date beach area first exceeds 5,593, FMSL – March 1, 2009* o Expected and actual production is as set forth in the following table: Time Period Expected Tailings Solids Disposition into Cell 4A Determined at the beginning of the period (dry tons)*
Expected Tailings Solids Disposition into Cell 4A at the beginning of the period, multiplied by 150% Safety Factor (dry tons)
Actual Tailings Solids Disposition into Cell 4A determined at end of the period (dry tons)*
March 1, 2009 to November 1, 2009
150,000 225,000 225,000
November 1, 2009 to November 1, 2010
300,000 450,000 275,000
November 1, 2010 to November 1, 2011
200,000 300,000 250,000
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 47 of 48

*These expected and actual tailings and production numbers and dates are fictional and have been assumed for illustrative purposes only. Based on these assumptions and factors, the freeboard limits for Cell 4A would be calculated as follows: 1. Prior to March 1, 2009 Prior to March 1, 2009, the maximum elevation of the beach area in Cell 4 is less than or equal to 5,593 FMSL, therefore the freeboard limit is set at 5,593.7 FMSL. 2. March 1, 2009 to November 1, 2009 The pool surface area would be reduced to the following amount (1 – 225,000 / (2,094,000 – 1,000,000)) x 40 acres = 31.77 acres Based on this reduced pool area, the amount of freeboard would be 159.4 acre feet divided by 31.77 acres equals 5.02 feet. When the wave run up factor for Cell 4A of 0.77 feet is added to this, the total freeboard required is 5.79 feet. This means that the freeboard limit for Cell 4A would be reduced from 5593.7 FMSL to 5592.7 FMSL (5598.5 FMSL minus 5.79 feet, rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a foot). This calculation would be performed at March 1, 2009, and this freeboard limit would persist until November 1, 2009. 3. November 1, 2009 to November 1, 2010 The pool surface area would be reduced to the following amount: First, recalculate the pool surface area that should have applied during the previous period, had modeled tonnages (i.e., expected tonnages grossed up by the 150% safety factor) equaled actual tonnages for the period. Since the actual tonnage of 225,000 dry tons was the same as the modeled tonnage of 225,000 dry tons, the recalculated pool surface area is the same as the modeled pool surface area for the previous period, which is 31.77 acres. Then, calculate the modeled pool surface area to be used for the period: (1 – 450,000 / (2,094,000 – 1,000,000 - 225,000)) x 31.77 acres = 15.32 acres Based on this reduced pool area, the amount of freeboard would be 159.4 acre feet divided by 15.32 acres equals 10.40 feet. When the wave run up factor for Cell 4A of 0.77 feet is added to this, the total freeboard required is 11.17 feet. This means that the freeboard limit for Cell 4A would be reduced from 5592.7 FMSL to 5587.3 FMSL (5598.5 FMSL minus 11.17 feet, rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a foot). This calculation would be performed at November 1, 2009, and this freeboard limit would persist until November 1, 2010.
White Mesa Mill – Standard Operating Procedures 8/10 Revision: Denison-10
Book 11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 3.1 Page 48 of 48

4. November 1, 2010 to November 1, 2011 The pool surface area would be reduced to the following amount: First, recalculate the pool surface area that should have applied during the previous period, had modeled tonnages (i.e., expected tonnages grossed up by the 150% safety factor) equaled actual tonnages for the period. Since modeled tonnages exceeded actual tonnages, the pool area was reduced too much during the previous period, and must be adjusted. The recalculated pool area for the previous period is: (1 – 275,000 / (2,094,000 – 1,000,000 - 225,000) x 31.77 acres = 21.72 acres. This recalculated pool surface area will be used as the starting point for the freeboard calculation to be performed at November 1, 2010. Then, calculate the modeled pool surface area to be used for the period: (1 – 300,000 / (2,094,000 – 1,000,000 - 225,000 – 275,000)) x 21.72 acres = 10.75 acres Based on this reduced pool area, the amount of freeboard would be 159.4 acre feet divided by 10.75 acres equals 14.83 feet. When the wave run up factor for Cell 4A of 0.77 feet is added to this, the total freeboard required is 15.60 feet. This means that the freeboard limit for Cell 4A would be reduced from 5587.3 FMSL to 5582.9 FMSL (5598.5 FMSL minus 15.60 feet, rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a foot). This calculation would be performed at November 1, 2010, and this freeboard limit would persist until November 1, 2011.
3/108/10 Revision Denison 1.46
Page 1
Cell 4A BAT Monitoring, Operations and Maintenance Plan.

Introduction
Construction of Cell 4A was authorized by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Radiation Control (“DRC) on June 25, 2007. The construction
authorization provided that Cell 4A shall not be in operation until after a BAT Monitoring, Operations and Maintenance Plan is submitted for Executive Secretary
review and approval. The Plan shall include requirements in Part F.3 of the Groundwater Discharge Permit No. UGW370004 (“GWDP”) and full fill the requirements of Parts
I.D.6, I.E.8, and I.F.8 of the GWDP.
Cell Design
Tailings Cell 4A consists of the following major elements:
a) Dikes – consisting of earthen embankments of compacted soil, constructed
between 1989-1990, and composed of four dikes, each including a 15-foot wide road at the top (minimum). On the north, east, and south margins these
dikes have slopes of 3H to 1V. The west dike has a interior slope of 2H to 1V. Width of these dikes varies; each has a minimum crest width of at least
15 feet to support an access road. Base width also varies from 89-feet on the east dike (with no exterior embankment), to 211-feet at the west dike.
b) Foundation – including subgrade soils over bedrock materials. Foundation
preparation included excavation and removal of contaminated soils, compaction of imported soils to a maximum dry density of 90%. Floor of
Cell 4A has an average slope of 1% that grades from the northeast to the southwest corners.
c) Tailings Capacity – the floor and inside slopes of Cell 4A encompass about 40 acres and have a maximum capacity of about 1.6 million cubic yards of
tailings material storage (as measured below the required 3-foot freeboard).
d) Liner and Leak Detection Systems – including the following layers, in descending order:
1) Primary Flexible Membrane Liner (FML) – consisting of impermeable 60 mil high density polyethylene (HDPE) membrane that extends across both
the entire cell floor and the inside side-slopes, and is anchored in a trench at the top of the dikes on all four sides. The primary FML will be in direct
physical contact with the tailings material over most of the Cell 4A floor area. In other locations, the primary FML will be in contact with the
slimes drain collection system (discussed below).
Cell 4A BAT Monitoring, Operations and Maintenance Plan 38/10 Revision Denison
1.46
Page 2

2) Leak Detection System – includes a permeable HDPE geonet fabric that extends across the entire area under the primary FML in Cell 4A, and
drains to a leak detection sump in the southwest corner. Access to the leak detection sump is via an 18-inch inside diameter (ID) PVC pipe placed
down the inside slope, located between the primary and secondary FML liners. At its base this pipe will be surrounded with a gravel filter set in
the leak detection sump, having dimensions of 10 feet by 10 feet by 2 feet deep. In turn, the gravel filter layer will be enclosed in an envelope of geotextile fabric. The purpose of both the gravel and geotextile fabric is to serve as a filter.
3) Secondary FML – consisting of an impermeable 60-mil HDPE membrane
found immediately below the leak detection geonet. Said FML also extends across the entire Cell 4A floor, up the inside side-slopes and is
also anchored in a trench at the top of all four dikes.
4) Geosynthetic Clay Liner – consisting of a manufactured geosynthetic clay
liner (GCL) composed of 0.2-inch of low permeability bentonite clay centered and stitched between two layers of geotextile. Prior to disposal of any wastewater in Cell 4A, the Permittee shall demonstrate that the
GCL has achieved a moisture content of at least 50% by weight. This item is a revised requirement per DRC letter to DUSA dated September
28, 2007
e) Slimes Drain Collection System – including a two-part system of strip drains
and perforated collection pipes both installed immediately above the primary FML, as follows:
1) Horizontal Strip Drain System – is installed in a herringbone pattern across the floor of Cell 4A that drain to a “backbone” of perforated collection pipes. These strip drains are made of a prefabricated two-part geo-composite drain material (solid polymer drainage strip) core surrounded by an envelope of non-woven geotextile filter fabric. The strip
drains are placed immediately over the primary FML on 50-foot centers, where they conduct fluids downgradient in a southwesterly direction to a
physical and hydraulic connection to the perforated slimes drain collection pipe. A series of continuous sand bags, filled with filter sand cover the
strip drains. The sand bags are composed of a woven polyester fabric filled with well graded filter sand to protect the drainage system from
plugging.
2) Horizontal Slimes Drain Collection Pipe System – includes a “backbone” piping system of 4-inch ID Schedule 40 perforated PVC slimes drain
collection (SDC) pipe found at the downgradient end of the strip drain lines. This pipe is in turn overlain by a berm of gravel that runs the entire
diagonal length of the cell, surrounded by a geotextile fabric cushion in immediate contact with the primary FML. In turn, the gravel is overlain
Cell 4A BAT Monitoring, Operations and Maintenance Plan 38/10 Revision Denison
1.46
Page 3
by a layer of non-woven geotextile to serve as an additional filter material.
This perforated collection pipe serves as the “backbone” to the slimes drain system and runs from the far northeast corner downhill to the far
southwest corner of Cell 4A where it joins the slimes drain access pipe.
3) Slimes Drain Access Pipe – consisting of an 18-inch ID Schedule 40 PVC
pipe placed down the inside slope of Cell 4A at the southwest corner, above the primary FML. Said pipe then merges with another horizontal
pipe of equivalent diameter and material, where it is enveloped by gravel and woven geotextile that serves as a cushion to protect the primary FML.
A reducer connects the horizontal 18-inch pipe with the 4-inch SDC pipe. At some future time, a pump will be set in this 18-inch pipe and used to remove tailings wastewaters for purposes of de-watering the tailings cell.
f) Dike Splash Pads – A minimum of eight (8) 10-foot wide splash pads are installed on the interior dike slopes to protect the primary FML from abrasion
and scouring by tailings slurry. These pads will consist of an extra layer of 60 mil HDPE membrane that will be placed down the inside slope of Cell 4A,
from the top of the dike and down the inside slope. The pads on the north side of the Cell will extend to a point 5-feet beyond the toe of the slope to protect the liner bottom during initial startup of the Cell. The exact location of the splash pads is detailed on the As-Built Plans and Specifications.
g) Rub Protection Sheets – In addition to the splash pads described in f) above,
rub sheets are installed beneath all piping entering or exiting Cell 4A that is not located directly on the splash pads.
h) Emergency Spillway – a concrete lined spillway constructed near the western corner of the north dike to allow emergency runoff from Cell 3 into Cell 4A.
This spillway will be limited to a 6-inch reinforced concrete slab set directly over the primary FML in a 4-foot deep trapezoidal channel. No other spillway
or overflow structure will be constructed at Cell 4A. All stormwater runoff and tailings wastewaters not retained in Cells 2 and 3, will be managed and contained in Cell 4A, including the Probable Maximum Precipitation and
flood event. Cell Operation

Solution Discharge
Cell 4A will initially be used for storage and evaporation of process solutions from the Mill operations. These process solutions will be from the uranium/vanadium solvent extraction circuit, or transferred from Cell 1
evaporation pond or the free water surface from Cell 3. The solution will be pumped to Cell 4A through 6 inch or 8 inch diameter HDPE pipelines. The initial
solution discharge will be in the southwest corner of the Cell. The discharge pipe will be routed down the Splash Pad provided in the corner of the Cell to protect
Cell 4A BAT Monitoring, Operations and Maintenance Plan 38/10 Revision Denison
1.46
Page 4
the pipeline running from the solution reclaim barge. The solution will be
discharged in the bottom of the Cell, away from any sand bags or other installation on the top of the FML. Building the solution pool from the low end of
the Cell will allow the solution pool to gradually rise around the slimes drain strips, eliminating any damage to the strip drains or the sand bag cover due to
solution flowing past the drainage strips. The solution will eventually be discharged along the dike between Cell 3 and Cell 4A, utilizing the Splash Pads
described above. The subsequent discharge of process solutions will be near the floor of the pond, through a discharge header designed to discharge through
multiple points, thereby reducing the potential to damage the Splash Pads or the Slimes Drain system. At no time will the solution be discharged into less than 2 feet of solution. As the cell begin to fill with solution the discharge point will be
pull back up the Splash Pad and allowed to continue discharging at or near the solution level.

Initial Solids Discharge
Once Cell 4A is needed for storage for tailings solids the slurry discharge from No. 8 CCD thickener will be pumped to the cell through 6 inch or 8 inch diameter HDPE pipelines. The pipelines will be routed along the dike between Cell 3 and
Cell 4A, with discharge valves and drop pipes extending down the Splash Pads to the solution level. One or all of the discharge points can be used depending on
operational considerations. Solids will settle into a cone, or mound, of material under the solution level, with the courser fraction settling out closer to the
discharge point. The initial discharge locations are shown on Figure 1. Figure 2 illustrates the general location of the solution and slurry discharge pipelines and
control valve locations. The valves are 6” or 8” stainless steel knife-gate valves. The initial discharge of slurry will be at or near the toe of the Cell slope and then
gradually moved up the slope, continuing to discharge at or near the water surface. This is illustrated in Section A-A on Figure 2. Because of the depth of Cell 4A, each of the discharge points will be utilized for an extended period of
time before the cone of material is above the maximum level of the solution. The discharge location will then moved further to the interior of the cell allowing for
additional volume of solids to be placed under the solution level. The solution level in the cell will vary depending on the operating schedule of the Mill and the
seasonal evaporation rates. The tailings slurry will not be allowed to discharge directly on to the Splash Pads, in order to further protect the FML. The tailings
slurry will discharge directly in to the solution contained in the Cell, onto an additional protective sheet, or on to previously deposited tailings sand.

Equipment Access
Access will be restricted to the interior portion of the cell due to the potential to
damage the flexible membrane liner. Only rubber tired all terrain vehicles or foot traffic will be allowed on the flexible membrane liner. Personnel are also
cautioned on the potential damage to the flexible membrane liner through the use
Cell 4A BAT Monitoring, Operations and Maintenance Plan 38/10 Revision Denison
1.46
Page 5
and handling of hand tools and maintenance materials.

Reclaim Water System
A pump barge and solution recovery system will be installed in the southwest corner of the cell to pump solution from the cell for water balance purposes or for
re-use in the Mill process. Figure 3 illustrates the routing of the solution return pipeline and the location of the pump barge. The pump barge will be constructed
and maintained to ensure that the flexible membrane liner is not damaged during the initial filling of the cell or subsequent operation and maintenance activities. The condition of the pump barge and access walkway will be noted during the weekly Cell inspections.

Interim Solids Discharge
Figure 4 illustrates the progression of the slurry discharge points around the east
side of Cell 4A. Once the tailings solids have been deposited along the north and east sides of the Cell, the discharges points will subsequently be moved to the sand beaches, which will eliminate any potential for damage to the liner system.

Liner Maintenance and QA/QC
Any construction defects or operational damage discovered during observation of the flexible membrane liner will be repaired, tested and documented according to
the procedures detailed in the approved Revised construction Quality Assurance Plan for the Construction of the Cell 4A Lining System, May
2007, by GeoSyntec Consultants.

BAT Performance Standards for Tailings Cell 4A
DUSA will operate and maintain Tailings Cell 4A so as to prevent release of wastewater to groundwater and the environment in accordance with this BAT Monitoring Operations
and Maintenance Plan, pursuant to Part I.H.19 of the GWDP. These performance standards shall include:

1) Leak Detection System Pumping and Monitoring Equipment – the
leak detection system pumping and monitoring equipment, includes a submersible pump, pump controller, water level indicator (head monitoring), and flow meter with volume totalizer. The pump controller
is set to maintain the maximum level in the leak detection system at no more than 1 foot above the lowest level of the secondary flexible
menbrane. A second leak detection pump with pressure transducer, flow meter, and manufacturer recommended spare parts for the pump controller
Cell 4A BAT Monitoring, Operations and Maintenance Plan 38/10 Revision Denison
1.46
Page 6
and water level data collector is maintained in the Mill warehouse to
ensure that the pump and controller can be replaced and operational within 24 hours of detection of a failure of the pumping system. The root cause
of the equipment failure will be documented in a report to Mill management with recommendations for prevention of a re-occurrence.

2) Maximum Allowable Head – the Permittee shall measure the fluid head
above the lowest point on the secondary flexible membrane by the use of procedures and equipment specified in the White Mesa Mill Tailings
Management System and Discharge Minimization Technology (DMT) Mmonitoring Plan, 3/0708/10 Revision: Denison-73, or the currently approved DMT Plan. Under no circumstance shall fluid head
in the leak detection system sump exceed a 1-foot level above the lowest point in the lower flexible membrane liner.
3) Maximum Allowable Daily LDS Flow Rates - the Permittee shall measure the volume of all fluids pumped from the LDS on a weekly
basis, and use that information to calculate an average volume pumped per day. Under no circumstances shall the daily LDS flow volume exceed 24,160 gallons/day. The maximum daily LDS flow volume will
be compared against the measured cell solution levels detailed on the attached Table 1 to determine the maximum daily allowable LDS flow
volume for varying head conditions in the cell. .
4) 3-foot Minimum Vertical Freeboard Criteria – the Permittee shall
operate and maintain wastewater levels to provide a 3-foot Minimum of vertical freeboard in Tailings Cell 4A. Said measurements shall be
made to the nearest 0.1 foot.
5) Slimes Drain Recovery Head Monitoring – immediately after the
Permittee initiates pumping conditions in the Tailings Cell 4A slimes drain system, monthly recovery head tests and fluid level measurements will be made in accordance with a plan approved by the DRC Executive
Secretary. The slimes drain system will pumping and monitoring equipment, includes a submersible pump, pump controller, water level
indicator (head monitoring), and flow meter with volume totalizer.

Routine Maintenance and Monitoring

Trained personnel inspect the White Mesa tailings system on a once per day basis. Any abnormal occurrences or changes in the system will be immediately reported to Mill management and maintenance personnel. The inspectors are trained to look for events
involving the routine placement of tailings material as well as events that could affect the integrity of the tailings cell dikes or lining systems. The daily inspection reports are
summarized on a monthly basis and reviewed and signed by the Mill Manager.
Cell 4A BAT Monitoring, Operations and Maintenance Plan 38/10 Revision Denison
1.46
Page 7

Solution Elevation
Measurements of solution elevation in Cell 4A are to be taken by survey on a weekly basis, and measurements of the beach area in Cell 4A with the highest
elevation are to be taken by survey on a monthly basis, by the use of the procedures and equipment specified in the latest approved edition of the DMT Plan. as follows:
(i) The survey will be performed by the Mill’s Radiation Safety
Officer or designee (the “Surveyor”) with the assistance of another Mill worker (the “Assistant”); (ii) The survey will be performed using a survey instrument (the
“Survey Instrument”) accurate to 0.01 feet, such as a Sokkai No. B21, or equivalent, together with a survey rod (the “Survey Rod”) having a visible scale in
0.01 foot increments; (iii) The reference Points (the “Reference Points”) for Cells 4A
are known points established by Registered Land Surveyor. For Cell 4A, the Reference Point is a piece of metal rebar located on the dike between Cell 3 and
Cell 4A. The elevation at the top of this piece of rebar (the Reference Point Elevation for Cell 4A is at 5,607.83 feet above mean sea level (“amsl”); (iv) The Surveyor will set up the Survey Instrument in a
location where both the applicable Reference Point and pond surface are visible. For Cell 4A, this is typically on the road between Cell 3 and Cell4A, approximately
100 feet east of the Cell 4A Reference Point; (v) Once in location, the Surveyor will ensure that the Survey
Instrument is level by centering the bubble in the level gauge on the Survey Instrument;
(vi) The Assistant will place the Survey Rod vertically on the Cell 4A Reference Point. The Assistant will ensure that the Survey Rod is vertical
by gently rocking the rod back and forth until the Surveyor has established a level reading; (vii) The Surveyor will focus the cross hairs of the Survey
Instrument on the scale on the Survey Rod, and record the number (the “Reference Point Reading”), which represents the number of feet the Survey Instrument is
reading above the Reference Point; The Assistant will then move to a designated location where the Survey Rod can be
placed on the surface of the main solution pond in Cell 4A. The designated location for Cell 4A is in the northeast corner of the Cell where the side slope allows for safe
access to the solution surface.
The approximate coordinate locations for the measuring points for Cell 4A is 2,579,360 east, and 320,300 north. These coordinate locations may vary somewhat depending on solution elevations in the Cell.
The Assistant will hold the Survey Rod vertically with one end of the Survey Rod
just touching the pond surface. The Assistant will ensure that the Survey Rod is
Formatted: Widow/Orphan control, Keep withnext
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.38",Widow/Orphan control, Keep with next
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.38", No bullets ornumbering, Keep with next, Don't adjust spacebetween Latin and Asian text, Don't adjustspace between Asian text and numbers
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.38", Keep withnext, Tab stops: Not at 1"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.38", Keep withnext, Tab stops: Not at 1" + 1.13"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.38", Keep withnext, Don't adjust space between Latin andAsian text, Don't adjust space between Asiantext and numbers, Tab stops: Not at 0.75"
Cell 4A BAT Monitoring, Operations and Maintenance Plan 38/10 Revision Denison
1.46
Page 8
vertical by gently rocking the rod back and forth until the Surveyor has established
a level reading;
(viii) The Surveyor will focus the cross hairs of the Survey Instrument on the scale on the Survey Rod, and record the number (the “Pond
Surface Reading”), which represents the number of feet the Survey Instrument is reading above the pond surface level.
The Surveyor will calculate the elevation of the pond surface in feet amsl by adding
the Reference Point Reading for the Cell and subtracting the Pond Surface Reading for the Cell, and will record the number accurate to 0.01 feet.

Leak Detection System

The Leak Ddetection Ssystem is monitored on a continuous basis by use of a pressure transducer that feeds water level information to an electronic
data collector. The water levels are measured every hour and the information is stored for later retrieval. The water levels are measured to the nearest 0.10 inch. The data collector is currently programmed to store
7 days of water level information. The number of days of stored data can be increased beyond 7 days if needed. The water level data is downloaded
to a laptop computer on a weekly basis and incorporated into the Mill’s environmental monitoring data base, and into the files for weekly
inspection reports of the tailings cell leak detection systems. Within 24 hours after collection of the weekly water level data, the information will
be evaluated to ensure that: 1) the water level in the leak detection sump did not exceed the allowable level (5556.14 feet amsl), and 2) the average
daily flow rate from the LDS did not exceed the maximum daily allowable flow rate at any time during the reporting period. For Cell 4A, under no circumstance shall fluid head in the leak detection system sump exceed a
1-foot level above the lowest point in the lower flexible membrane liner. To determine the Maximum Allowable Daily LDS Flow Rates in the Cell
4A leak detection system, the total volume of all fluids pumped from the LDS on a weekly basis shall be recovered from the data collector, and that
information will be used to calculate an average volume pumped per day. Under no circumstances shall the daily LDS flow volume exceed 24,160
gallons/day. The maximum daily LDS flow volume will be compared against the measured cell solution levels detailed on the attached Table 1,
to determine the maximum daily allowable LDS flow volume for varying head conditions in Cell 4A. Any abnormal or out of compliance water levels must be immediately reported to Mill management. The data
collector is also equipped with an audible alarm that sounds if the water level in the leak detection sump exceeds the allowable level (5556.14 feet
amsl). The current water level is displayed at all times on the data collector and available for recording on the daily inspection form. The
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.38", Keep withnext
Formatted: Left, Indent: Left: 0.38", SpaceBefore: 0 pt, Widow/Orphan control, Keepwith next, Tab stops: 0.38", Left + 1.94", Left
Cell 4A BAT Monitoring, Operations and Maintenance Plan 38/10 Revision Denison
1.46
Page 9
leak detection system is also equipped with a leak detection pump, EPS
Model # 25S05-3 stainless steel, or equal. The pump is capable of pumping in excess of 25 gallons per minute at a total dynamic head of 50
feet. The pump has a 1.5 inch diameter discharge, and operates on 460 volt 3 phase power. The pump is equipped with a pressure sensing
transducer to start the pump once the level of solution in the leak detection sump is approximately 2.25 feet (elevation 5555.89) above the lowest
level of the leak detection sump (9 inches above the lowest point on the lower flexible membrane liner, to ensure the allowable 1.0 foot (5556.14
feet amsl) above the lowest point on the lower flexible membrane liner is not exceeded). The attached Figure 6, Leak Detection Sump Operating Elevations, illustrates the relationship between the sump elevation, the
lowest point on the lower flexible membrane liner and the pump-on solution elevation for the leak detection pump. The pump also has manual
start and stop controls. The pump will operate until the solution is drawn down to the lowest level possible, expected to be approximately 4 inches
above the lowest level of the sump (approximate elevation 5554.0). The pump discharge is equipped with a 1.5 inch flow meter, EPS Paddle
Wheel Flowsensor, or equal, that reads the pump discharge in gallons per minute, and records total gallons pumped. The flow rate and total gallons is recorded by the Inspector on the weekly inspection form. The leak
detection pump is installed in the horizontal section of the 18 inch, horizontal, perforated section of the PVC collection pipe. The distance
from the top flange face, at the collection pipe invert, to the centerline of the 22.5 degree elbow is 133.4 feet, and the vertical height is
approximately 45 feet. The pump is installed at least 2 feet beyond the centerline of the elbow. The bottom of the pump will be installed in the
leak detection sump at least 135.4 feet or more from the top of the flange invert. A pressure transducer installed with the pump continuously
measures the solution head and is programmed to start and stop the pump within the ranges specified above. The attached Figure 5 illustrates the general configuration of the pump installation.

A second leak detection pump with pressure transducer, flow meter, and
manufacturer recommended spare parts for the pump controller and water level data collector will be maintained in the Mill warehouse to ensure that
the pump and controller can be replaced and operational within 24 hours of detection of a failure of the pumping system. The root cause of the
equipment failure will be documented in a report to Mill management with recommendations for prevention of a re-occurrence.

Slimes Drain System

(i) A pump, Tsurumi Model # KTZ23.7-62 stainless steel, or equal, will be
Cell 4A BAT Monitoring, Operations and Maintenance Plan 38/10 Revision Denison
1.46
Page 10
placed inside of the slimes drain access riser pipe and a near as possible to
the bottom of the slimes drain sump. The bottom of the slimes drain sump is 38 feet below a water level measuring point at the centerline of the
slimes drain access pipe, near the ground surface level. The pump discharge will be equipped with a 2 inch flow meter, E/H Model #33, or
equal, that reads the pump discharge in gallons per minute, and records total gallons pumped. The flow rate and total gallons will be recorded by
the Inspector on the weekly inspection form. (ii) The slimes drain pump will be on adjustable probes that allows the pump
to be set to start and stop on intervals determined by Mill management. (iii)The Cell 4A slimes drain pump will be checked weekly to observe that it is operating and that the level probes are set properly, which is noted on
the Weekly Tailings Inspection Form. If at any time the pump is observed to be not working properly, it will be repaired or replaced within 15 days;
(iv) Depth to wastewater in the Cell 4A slimes drain access riser pipe shall be monitored and recorded weekly to determine maximum and minimum
fluid head before and after a pumping cycle, respectively. All head measurements must be made from the same measuring point, to the
nearest 0.01 foot. The results will be recorded as depth-in-pipe measurements on the Weekly Tailings Inspection Form; (v) On a monthly basis, the slimes drain pump will be turned off and the
wastewater in the slimes drain access pipe will be allowed to stabilize for at least 90 hours. Once the water level has stabilized (based on no change
in water level for three (3) successive readings taken no less than one (1) hour apart) the water level of the wastewater will be measured and
recorded as a depth-in-pipe measurement on the Monthly Inspection Data form, by measuring the depth to water below the water level measuring
point on the slimes drain access pipe;
The slimes drain pump will not be operated until Mill management has determined that no additional process solutions will be discharged to Cell 4A, and the Cell has been partially covered with the first phase of the reclamation cap. The long term effectiveness and performance of the slimes drain dewatering will
be evaluated on the same basis as the currently operating slimes drain system for Cell 2.

Tailings Emergencies
Inspectors will notify the Radiation Safety Officer and/or Mill management immediately
if, during their inspection, they discover that an abnormal condition exists or an event has occurred that could cause a tailings emergency. Until relieved by the Environmental or Radiation Technician or Radiation Safety Officer, inspectors will have the authority to
direct resources during tailings emergencies.
Any major catastrophic events or conditions pertaining to the tailings area should be
Cell 4A BAT Monitoring, Operations and Maintenance Plan 38/10 Revision Denison
1.46
Page 11
reported immediately to the Mill Manager or the Radiation Safety Officer, one of whom
will notify Corporate Management. If dam failure occurs, notify your supervisor and the Mill Manager immediately. The Mill Manager will then notify Corporate Management,
MSHA (303-231-5465), and the State of Utah, Division of Dam Safety (801-538-7200).

Cell 4A Solution Freeboard Calculation
The maximum tailings cell pond wastewater levels in Cells 1-I, Cell 2, Cell 3 and Cell 4A
are regulated by condition 10.3 of the White Mesa Mill 11e.(2) Materials License. Condition 10.3 states that “The Freeboard limits for Cells 1-1, and 3, shall be 5615.4
feet above mean seal level, and the freeboard limit for Cell 4A shall be set periodically in accordance with the procedures set out in Section 3.0 to Appendix E of the previously approved NRC license application, including the October 13, 1999 revisions made to the January 10, 1990 Drainage Report. The freeboard limit for
Cell 3 shall be recalculated annually in accordance with the procedures set in the October 13, 1999 revision to the Drainage Reportannually in accordance with the
procedures set out in the latest edition of the White Mesa Mill Tailings Management System and Discharge Minimization Technology (DMT) Monitoring Plan, which is included as a section of the Mill’s Environmental Protection Manual. Said calculations shall be submitted as part of the Annual Technical Evaluation Report. Said report shall be submitted for Executive Secretary approval no later than November 15 of each year.”
The freeboard limits set out in Section 6.3 of the DMT Plan are intended to capture 1990 Drainage Report uses the Local 6-hour Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) event,
which was determined in the January 10, 1990 Drainage Report for calculating the freeboard requirements for each of the tailings cells. The PMP for the White Mesa site is to be 10 inches. Based on the PMP storm event, the freeboard requirement for Cell 1 is a maximum
operating water level of 5615.4 feet above mean sea level (amsl). The Cell 1 freeboard limit is not affected by operations or conditions in Cells 2, 3 or 4A.
Cells 2 and 3 haves no freeboard limit because those Cells is 99%are full or near full of
tailings solids and all precipitation falling on Cell 2 and 3 and the adjacent drainage area must be contained in Cell 4A3. The flood volume from the PMP event over the Cell 2
and Cell 3 pond areas, plus the adjacent drainage areas, which must be contained in Cell 4A, is 123.4 acre-feet of water. According to the freeboard calculation procedures, this volume currently must be contained in the existing 24-acre pool area in Cell 3. This results in a maximum operating water level in Cell 3 of 5601.6 feet amsl.
The Cell 4A design includes a concrete spillway between Cell 3 and Cell 4A with the invert elevation 4 feet below the top of the Cell 3 dike, at an elevation of 5604.5 feet
amsl. Once Cell 4A is placed in operation, the cell would be available for emergency
Cell 4A BAT Monitoring, Operations and Maintenance Plan 38/10 Revision Denison
1.46
Page 12
overflows from Cell 3, but as long as the freeboard limit in Cell 3 is maintained at 5601.6
it is extremely unlikely that Cell 4A would see any overflow water from Cell 3 unless the full PMP event were to occur. Should Cell 3 receive the full PMP volume of 123.4 acre
feet of water, approximately 62 acre feet of that volume would flow through the spillway into Cell 4A.
The flood volume from the PMP event over the Cell 4A area is 36 acre-feet of water (40
acres, plus the adjacent drainage area of 3.25 acres, times the PMP of 10 inches). This would result in a total flood volume of 98 159.4 acre-feet, including the 62 123.4 acre-
feet of solution from Cells 2 and 3, that must be contained in Cell 4A. The procedure for calculating the freeboard limit for Cell 4A is set out in the DMT Plan. The freeboard depth required for Cell 4A from the PMP event would be 2.44 feet, plus a wave run-up
depth of 0.77 feet (from the 1990 Drainage Report), for a total freeboard requirement of 3.2 feet. This calculation is illustrated on Attachment 4. The Groundwater Quality
Discharge Permit, No. UGW370004, for the White Mesa Mill requires that the minimum freeboard be no less than 3.0 feet for any of the existing Cell construction, but based on
the above calculation the freeboard would be set 3.2 feet below the top of liner. The freeboard for Cell 4A would therefore be 5595.3 amsl (top of liner 5598.5 – 3.2 feet).
Figure 7, Hydraulic Profile Schematic, shows the relationship between the Cells, and the relative elevations of the solution pools and the spillway elevations.
If Cell 4A were required to store the entire PMP event for Cell 2, Cell 3 and Cell 4A, the required storage volume would be approximately 160 acre-feet of solution. This would
increase the necessary freeboard to 4.77 feet.
The Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit, No. UGW370004, for the White Mesa Mill requires that the minimum freeboard be no less than 3.0 feet for Cells 1 and 4A, but
based on License condition 10.3 and the procedure set out in the DMT Plan, the freeboard limits for Cells 1 and 4A will be at least three feet.
Figure 7, Hydraulic Profile Schematic, shows the relationship between the Cells, and the relative elevations of the solution pools and the spillway elevations.
The required freeboard for Cell 4A will be recalculated annually. along with the re-
calculation of the Cell 3 freeboard requirement. A calculation of the current freeboard calculation for both Cells is attached to this Plan.

Cell 4A BAT Monitoring, Operations and Maintenance Plan 38/10 Revision Denison
1.46
Page 13

Attachments
1) Figure 1, Initial Filling Plan, GeoSyntec Consultants
2) Figure 2, Initial Filling Plan, Details and Sections, GeoSyntec Consultants
3) Figure 3, Initial Filling Plan, Solution and Slurry Pipeline Routes, GeoSyntec
Consultants 4) Figure 4, Interim Filling Plan, GeoSyntec Consultants
5) Figure 5, Leak Detection System Sump, GeoSyntec Consultants
6) Figure 6, Leak Detection Sump Operating Elevations
7) Figure 7, Hydraulic Profile Schematic
8) Cell 3 and Cell 4A Freeboard Calculation
9) Table 1, Calculated Action leakage Rates for Various Head Conditions, Cell 4A, White Mesa Mill, Blanding, Utah, GeoSyntec Consultants
10) White Mesa Mill Tailings Management System and Discharge Minimization
Technology (DMT) Monitoring Plan, 3/07 Revision: DUSA-2, 32 pages, or currently approved version of the DMT
8/10 Revision Denison 1.6
Page 1
Cell 4A BAT Monitoring, Operations and Maintenance Plan.

Introduction
Construction of Cell 4A was authorized by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Radiation Control (“DRC) on June 25, 2007. The construction
authorization provided that Cell 4A shall not be in operation until after a BAT
Monitoring, Operations and Maintenance Plan is submitted for Executive Secretary
review and approval. The Plan shall include requirements in Part F.3 of the Groundwater Discharge Permit No. UGW370004 (“GWDP”) and full fill the requirements of Parts I.D.6, I.E.8, and I.F.8 of the GWDP.

Cell Design Tailings Cell 4A consists of the following major elements:
a) Dikes – consisting of earthen embankments of compacted soil, constructed
between 1989-1990, and composed of four dikes, each including a 15-foot
wide road at the top (minimum). On the north, east, and south margins these dikes have slopes of 3H to 1V. The west dike has a interior slope of 2H to 1V. Width of these dikes varies; each has a minimum crest width of at least
15 feet to support an access road. Base width also varies from 89-feet on the
east dike (with no exterior embankment), to 211-feet at the west dike.
b) Foundation – including subgrade soils over bedrock materials. Foundation preparation included excavation and removal of contaminated soils, compaction of imported soils to a maximum dry density of 90%. Floor of
Cell 4A has an average slope of 1% that grades from the northeast to the
southwest corners.
c) Tailings Capacity – the floor and inside slopes of Cell 4A encompass about 40 acres and have a maximum capacity of about 1.6 million cubic yards of tailings material storage (as measured below the required 3-foot freeboard).
d) Liner and Leak Detection Systems – including the following layers, in
descending order:
1) Primary Flexible Membrane Liner (FML) – consisting of impermeable 60 mil high density polyethylene (HDPE) membrane that extends across both the entire cell floor and the inside side-slopes, and is anchored in a trench
at the top of the dikes on all four sides. The primary FML will be in direct
physical contact with the tailings material over most of the Cell 4A floor
area. In other locations, the primary FML will be in contact with the slimes drain collection system (discussed below).
Cell 4A BAT Monitoring, Operations and Maintenance Plan 8/10 Revision Denison 1.6

Page 2

2) Leak Detection System – includes a permeable HDPE geonet fabric that
extends across the entire area under the primary FML in Cell 4A, and
drains to a leak detection sump in the southwest corner. Access to the leak detection sump is via an 18-inch inside diameter (ID) PVC pipe placed
down the inside slope, located between the primary and secondary FML
liners. At its base this pipe will be surrounded with a gravel filter set in
the leak detection sump, having dimensions of 10 feet by 10 feet by 2 feet
deep. In turn, the gravel filter layer will be enclosed in an envelope of geotextile fabric. The purpose of both the gravel and geotextile fabric is to
serve as a filter.
3) Secondary FML – consisting of an impermeable 60-mil HDPE membrane
found immediately below the leak detection geonet. Said FML also
extends across the entire Cell 4A floor, up the inside side-slopes and is also anchored in a trench at the top of all four dikes.
4) Geosynthetic Clay Liner – consisting of a manufactured geosynthetic clay
liner (GCL) composed of 0.2-inch of low permeability bentonite clay
centered and stitched between two layers of geotextile. Prior to disposal
of any wastewater in Cell 4A, the Permittee shall demonstrate that the GCL has achieved a moisture content of at least 50% by weight. This
item is a revised requirement per DRC letter to DUSA dated September
28, 2007
e) Slimes Drain Collection System – including a two-part system of strip drains
and perforated collection pipes both installed immediately above the primary FML, as follows:
1) Horizontal Strip Drain System – is installed in a herringbone pattern
across the floor of Cell 4A that drain to a “backbone” of perforated
collection pipes. These strip drains are made of a prefabricated two-part
geo-composite drain material (solid polymer drainage strip) core surrounded by an envelope of non-woven geotextile filter fabric. The strip
drains are placed immediately over the primary FML on 50-foot centers,
where they conduct fluids downgradient in a southwesterly direction to a
physical and hydraulic connection to the perforated slimes drain collection
pipe. A series of continuous sand bags, filled with filter sand cover the strip drains. The sand bags are composed of a woven polyester fabric
filled with well graded filter sand to protect the drainage system from
plugging.
2) Horizontal Slimes Drain Collection Pipe System – includes a “backbone”
piping system of 4-inch ID Schedule 40 perforated PVC slimes drain collection (SDC) pipe found at the downgradient end of the strip drain
lines. This pipe is in turn overlain by a berm of gravel that runs the entire
diagonal length of the cell, surrounded by a geotextile fabric cushion in
immediate contact with the primary FML. In turn, the gravel is overlain
Cell 4A BAT Monitoring, Operations and Maintenance Plan 8/10 Revision Denison 1.6

Page 3
by a layer of non-woven geotextile to serve as an additional filter material.
This perforated collection pipe serves as the “backbone” to the slimes
drain system and runs from the far northeast corner downhill to the far
southwest corner of Cell 4A where it joins the slimes drain access pipe.
3) Slimes Drain Access Pipe – consisting of an 18-inch ID Schedule 40 PVC
pipe placed down the inside slope of Cell 4A at the southwest corner,
above the primary FML. Said pipe then merges with another horizontal
pipe of equivalent diameter and material, where it is enveloped by gravel
and woven geotextile that serves as a cushion to protect the primary FML. A reducer connects the horizontal 18-inch pipe with the 4-inch SDC pipe.
At some future time, a pump will be set in this 18-inch pipe and used to
remove tailings wastewaters for purposes of de-watering the tailings cell.
f) Dike Splash Pads – A minimum of eight (8) 10-foot wide splash pads are
installed on the interior dike slopes to protect the primary FML from abrasion and scouring by tailings slurry. These pads will consist of an extra layer of 60
mil HDPE membrane that will be placed down the inside slope of Cell 4A,
from the top of the dike and down the inside slope. The pads on the north side
of the Cell will extend to a point 5-feet beyond the toe of the slope to protect
the liner bottom during initial startup of the Cell. The exact location of the splash pads is detailed on the As-Built Plans and Specifications.
g) Rub Protection Sheets – In addition to the splash pads described in f) above,
rub sheets are installed beneath all piping entering or exiting Cell 4A that is
not located directly on the splash pads.
h) Emergency Spillway – a concrete lined spillway constructed near the western corner of the north dike to allow emergency runoff from Cell 3 into Cell 4A.
This spillway will be limited to a 6-inch reinforced concrete slab set directly
over the primary FML in a 4-foot deep trapezoidal channel. No other spillway
or overflow structure will be constructed at Cell 4A. All stormwater runoff
and tailings wastewaters not retained in Cells 2 and 3, will be managed and contained in Cell 4A, including the Probable Maximum Precipitation and
flood event.

Cell Operation

Solution Discharge
Cell 4A will initially be used for storage and evaporation of process solutions
from the Mill operations. These process solutions will be from the
uranium/vanadium solvent extraction circuit, or transferred from Cell 1 evaporation pond or the free water surface from Cell 3. The solution will be
pumped to Cell 4A through 6 inch or 8 inch diameter HDPE pipelines. The initial
solution discharge will be in the southwest corner of the Cell. The discharge pipe
will be routed down the Splash Pad provided in the corner of the Cell to protect
Cell 4A BAT Monitoring, Operations and Maintenance Plan 8/10 Revision Denison 1.6

Page 4
the pipeline running from the solution reclaim barge. The solution will be
discharged in the bottom of the Cell, away from any sand bags or other
installation on the top of the FML. Building the solution pool from the low end of
the Cell will allow the solution pool to gradually rise around the slimes drain strips, eliminating any damage to the strip drains or the sand bag cover due to
solution flowing past the drainage strips. The solution will eventually be
discharged along the dike between Cell 3 and Cell 4A, utilizing the Splash Pads
described above. The subsequent discharge of process solutions will be near the
floor of the pond, through a discharge header designed to discharge through multiple points, thereby reducing the potential to damage the Splash Pads or the
Slimes Drain system. At no time will the solution be discharged into less than 2
feet of solution. As the cell begin to fill with solution the discharge point will be
pull back up the Splash Pad and allowed to continue discharging at or near the
solution level.

Initial Solids Discharge
Once Cell 4A is needed for storage for tailings solids the slurry discharge from
No. 8 CCD thickener will be pumped to the cell through 6 inch or 8 inch diameter
HDPE pipelines. The pipelines will be routed along the dike between Cell 3 and Cell 4A, with discharge valves and drop pipes extending down the Splash Pads to the solution level. One or all of the discharge points can be used depending on
operational considerations. Solids will settle into a cone, or mound, of material
under the solution level, with the courser fraction settling out closer to the
discharge point. The initial discharge locations are shown on Figure 1. Figure 2 illustrates the general location of the solution and slurry discharge pipelines and control valve locations. The valves are 6” or 8” stainless steel knife-gate valves.
The initial discharge of slurry will be at or near the toe of the Cell slope and then
gradually moved up the slope, continuing to discharge at or near the water
surface. This is illustrated in Section A-A on Figure 2. Because of the depth of Cell 4A, each of the discharge points will be utilized for an extended period of time before the cone of material is above the maximum level of the solution. The
discharge location will then moved further to the interior of the cell allowing for
additional volume of solids to be placed under the solution level. The solution
level in the cell will vary depending on the operating schedule of the Mill and the seasonal evaporation rates. The tailings slurry will not be allowed to discharge directly on to the Splash Pads, in order to further protect the FML. The tailings
slurry will discharge directly in to the solution contained in the Cell, onto an
additional protective sheet, or on to previously deposited tailings sand.

Equipment Access
Access will be restricted to the interior portion of the cell due to the potential to
damage the flexible membrane liner. Only rubber tired all terrain vehicles or foot
traffic will be allowed on the flexible membrane liner. Personnel are also
cautioned on the potential damage to the flexible membrane liner through the use
Cell 4A BAT Monitoring, Operations and Maintenance Plan 8/10 Revision Denison 1.6

Page 5
and handling of hand tools and maintenance materials.

Reclaim Water System
A pump barge and solution recovery system will be installed in the southwest corner of the cell to pump solution from the cell for water balance purposes or for
re-use in the Mill process. Figure 3 illustrates the routing of the solution return
pipeline and the location of the pump barge. The pump barge will be constructed
and maintained to ensure that the flexible membrane liner is not damaged during
the initial filling of the cell or subsequent operation and maintenance activities. The condition of the pump barge and access walkway will be noted during the
weekly Cell inspections.

Interim Solids Discharge
Figure 4 illustrates the progression of the slurry discharge points around the east side of Cell 4A. Once the tailings solids have been deposited along the north and
east sides of the Cell, the discharges points will subsequently be moved to the
sand beaches, which will eliminate any potential for damage to the liner system.

Liner Maintenance and QA/QC
Any construction defects or operational damage discovered during observation of
the flexible membrane liner will be repaired, tested and documented according to
the procedures detailed in the approved Revised construction Quality
Assurance Plan for the Construction of the Cell 4A Lining System, May
2007, by GeoSyntec Consultants.

BAT Performance Standards for Tailings Cell 4A
DUSA will operate and maintain Tailings Cell 4A so as to prevent release of wastewater
to groundwater and the environment in accordance with this BAT Monitoring Operations
and Maintenance Plan, pursuant to Part I.H.19 of the GWDP. These performance standards shall include:

1) Leak Detection System Pumping and Monitoring Equipment – the
leak detection system pumping and monitoring equipment, includes a
submersible pump, pump controller, water level indicator (head monitoring), and flow meter with volume totalizer. The pump controller
is set to maintain the maximum level in the leak detection system at no
more than 1 foot above the lowest level of the secondary flexible
menbrane. A second leak detection pump with pressure transducer, flow
meter, and manufacturer recommended spare parts for the pump controller and water level data collector is maintained in the Mill warehouse to
Cell 4A BAT Monitoring, Operations and Maintenance Plan 8/10 Revision Denison 1.6

Page 6
ensure that the pump and controller can be replaced and operational within
24 hours of detection of a failure of the pumping system. The root cause
of the equipment failure will be documented in a report to Mill
management with recommendations for prevention of a re-occurrence.

2) Maximum Allowable Head – the Permittee shall measure the fluid head
above the lowest point on the secondary flexible membrane by the use of
procedures and equipment specified in the White Mesa Mill Tailings
Management System and Discharge Minimization Technology (DMT) Monitoring Plan, 08/10 Revision: Denison-7, or the currently
approved DMT Plan. Under no circumstance shall fluid head in the leak
detection system sump exceed a 1-foot level above the lowest point in
the lower flexible membrane liner.
3) Maximum Allowable Daily LDS Flow Rates - the Permittee shall measure the volume of all fluids pumped from the LDS on a weekly
basis, and use that information to calculate an average volume pumped
per day. Under no circumstances shall the daily LDS flow volume
exceed 24,160 gallons/day. The maximum daily LDS flow volume will
be compared against the measured cell solution levels detailed on the attached Table 1 to determine the maximum daily allowable LDS flow
volume for varying head conditions in the cell. .
4) 3-foot Minimum Vertical Freeboard Criteria – the Permittee shall
operate and maintain wastewater levels to provide a 3-foot Minimum of
vertical freeboard in Tailings Cell 4A. Said measurements shall be made to the nearest 0.1 foot.
5) Slimes Drain Recovery Head Monitoring – immediately after the
Permittee initiates pumping conditions in the Tailings Cell 4A slimes
drain system, monthly recovery head tests and fluid level measurements
will be made in accordance with a plan approved by the DRC Executive Secretary. The slimes drain system will pumping and monitoring
equipment, includes a submersible pump, pump controller, water level
indicator (head monitoring), and flow meter with volume totalizer.

Routine Maintenance and Monitoring

Trained personnel inspect the White Mesa tailings system on a once per day basis. Any
abnormal occurrences or changes in the system will be immediately reported to Mill
management and maintenance personnel. The inspectors are trained to look for events
involving the routine placement of tailings material as well as events that could affect the integrity of the tailings cell dikes or lining systems. The daily inspection reports are
summarized on a monthly basis and reviewed and signed by the Mill Manager.

Cell 4A BAT Monitoring, Operations and Maintenance Plan 8/10 Revision Denison 1.6

Page 7
Solution Elevation

Measurements of solution elevation in Cell 4A are to be taken by survey on a
weekly basis, and measurements of the beach area in Cell 4A with the highest elevation are to be taken by survey on a monthly basis, by the use of the procedures
and equipment specified in the latest approved edition of the DMT Plan.

Leak Detection System
The Leak Detection System is monitored on a continuous basis by use of a
pressure transducer that feeds water level information to an electronic data
collector. The water levels are measured every hour and the information
is stored for later retrieval. The water levels are measured to the nearest
0.10 inch. The data collector is currently programmed to store 7 days of water level information. The number of days of stored data can be
increased beyond 7 days if needed. The water level data is downloaded to
a laptop computer on a weekly basis and incorporated into the Mill’s
environmental monitoring data base, and into the files for weekly
inspection reports of the tailings cell leak detection systems. Within 24 hours after collection of the weekly water level data, the information will
be evaluated to ensure that: 1) the water level in the leak detection sump
did not exceed the allowable level (5556.14 feet amsl), and 2) the average
daily flow rate from the LDS did not exceed the maximum daily allowable
flow rate at any time during the reporting period. For Cell 4A, under no circumstance shall fluid head in the leak detection system sump exceed a
1-foot level above the lowest point in the lower flexible membrane liner.
To determine the Maximum Allowable Daily LDS Flow Rates in the Cell
4A leak detection system, the total volume of all fluids pumped from the
LDS on a weekly basis shall be recovered from the data collector, and that information will be used to calculate an average volume pumped per day. Under no circumstances shall the daily LDS flow volume exceed 24,160
gallons/day. The maximum daily LDS flow volume will be compared
against the measured cell solution levels detailed on the attached Table 1,
to determine the maximum daily allowable LDS flow volume for varying head conditions in Cell 4A. Any abnormal or out of compliance water levels must be immediately reported to Mill management. The data
collector is also equipped with an audible alarm that sounds if the water
level in the leak detection sump exceeds the allowable level (5556.14 feet
amsl). The current water level is displayed at all times on the data collector and available for recording on the daily inspection form. The leak detection system is also equipped with a leak detection pump, EPS
Model # 25S05-3 stainless steel, or equal. The pump is capable of
pumping in excess of 25 gallons per minute at a total dynamic head of 50
feet. The pump has a 1.5 inch diameter discharge, and operates on 460 volt 3 phase power. The pump is equipped with a pressure sensing
Cell 4A BAT Monitoring, Operations and Maintenance Plan 8/10 Revision Denison 1.6

Page 8
transducer to start the pump once the level of solution in the leak detection
sump is approximately 2.25 feet (elevation 5555.89) above the lowest
level of the leak detection sump (9 inches above the lowest point on the
lower flexible membrane liner, to ensure the allowable 1.0 foot (5556.14 feet amsl) above the lowest point on the lower flexible membrane liner is
not exceeded). The attached Figure 6, Leak Detection Sump Operating
Elevations, illustrates the relationship between the sump elevation, the
lowest point on the lower flexible membrane liner and the pump-on
solution elevation for the leak detection pump. The pump also has manual start and stop controls. The pump will operate until the solution is drawn
down to the lowest level possible, expected to be approximately 4 inches
above the lowest level of the sump (approximate elevation 5554.0). The
pump discharge is equipped with a 1.5 inch flow meter, EPS Paddle
Wheel Flowsensor, or equal, that reads the pump discharge in gallons per minute, and records total gallons pumped. The flow rate and total gallons
is recorded by the Inspector on the weekly inspection form. The leak
detection pump is installed in the horizontal section of the 18 inch,
horizontal, perforated section of the PVC collection pipe. The distance
from the top flange face, at the collection pipe invert, to the centerline of the 22.5 degree elbow is 133.4 feet, and the vertical height is
approximately 45 feet. The pump is installed at least 2 feet beyond the
centerline of the elbow. The bottom of the pump will be installed in the
leak detection sump at least 135.4 feet or more from the top of the flange
invert. A pressure transducer installed with the pump continuously measures the solution head and is programmed to start and stop the pump
within the ranges specified above. The attached Figure 5 illustrates the
general configuration of the pump installation.

A second leak detection pump with pressure transducer, flow meter, and manufacturer recommended spare parts for the pump controller and water
level data collector will be maintained in the Mill warehouse to ensure that
the pump and controller can be replaced and operational within 24 hours
of detection of a failure of the pumping system. The root cause of the
equipment failure will be documented in a report to Mill management with recommendations for prevention of a re-occurrence.

Slimes Drain System

(i) A pump, Tsurumi Model # KTZ23.7-62 stainless steel, or equal, will be placed inside of the slimes drain access riser pipe and a near as possible to
the bottom of the slimes drain sump. The bottom of the slimes drain sump
is 38 feet below a water level measuring point at the centerline of the
slimes drain access pipe, near the ground surface level. The pump
discharge will be equipped with a 2 inch flow meter, E/H Model #33, or
Cell 4A BAT Monitoring, Operations and Maintenance Plan 8/10 Revision Denison 1.6

Page 9
equal, that reads the pump discharge in gallons per minute, and records
total gallons pumped. The flow rate and total gallons will be recorded by
the Inspector on the weekly inspection form.
(ii) The slimes drain pump will be on adjustable probes that allow the pump to be set to start and stop on intervals determined by Mill management.
(iii)The Cell 4A slimes drain pump will be checked weekly to observe that it
is operating and that the level probes are set properly, which is noted on
the Weekly Tailings Inspection Form. If at any time the pump is observed
to be not working properly, it will be repaired or replaced within 15 days; (iv) Depth to wastewater in the Cell 4A slimes drain access riser pipe shall be
monitored and recorded weekly to determine maximum and minimum
fluid head before and after a pumping cycle, respectively. All head
measurements must be made from the same measuring point, to the
nearest 0.01 foot. The results will be recorded as depth-in-pipe measurements on the Weekly Tailings Inspection Form;
(v) On a monthly basis, the slimes drain pump will be turned off and the
wastewater in the slimes drain access pipe will be allowed to stabilize for
at least 90 hours. Once the water level has stabilized (based on no change
in water level for three (3) successive readings taken no less than one (1) hour apart) the water level of the wastewater will be measured and
recorded as a depth-in-pipe measurement on the Monthly Inspection Data
form, by measuring the depth to water below the water level measuring
point on the slimes drain access pipe;
The slimes drain pump will not be operated until Mill management has determined that no additional process solutions will be discharged to Cell 4A, and
the Cell has been partially covered with the first phase of the reclamation cap.
The long term effectiveness and performance of the slimes drain dewatering will
be evaluated on the same basis as the currently operating slimes drain system for
Cell 2.

Tailings Emergencies

Inspectors will notify the Radiation Safety Officer and/or Mill management immediately
if, during their inspection, they discover that an abnormal condition exists or an event has occurred that could cause a tailings emergency. Until relieved by the Environmental or
Radiation Technician or Radiation Safety Officer, inspectors will have the authority to
direct resources during tailings emergencies.

Any major catastrophic events or conditions pertaining to the tailings area should be reported immediately to the Mill Manager or the Radiation Safety Officer, one of whom
will notify Corporate Management. If dam failure occurs, notify your supervisor and the
Mill Manager immediately. The Mill Manager will then notify Corporate Management,
MSHA (303-231-5465), and the State of Utah, Division of Dam Safety (801-538-7200).

Cell 4A BAT Monitoring, Operations and Maintenance Plan 8/10 Revision Denison 1.6

Page 10

Cell 4A Solution Freeboard Calculation

The maximum tailings cell pond wastewater levels in Cells 1-I, Cell 2, Cell 3 and Cell 4A are regulated by condition 10.3 of the White Mesa Mill 11e.(2) Materials License.

Condition 10.3 states that “The Freeboard limit for Cells 1shall be 5615.4 feet above
mean seal level, and the freeboard limit for Cell 4A shall be set annually in
accordance with the procedures set out in the latest edition of the White Mesa Mill Tailings Management System and Discharge Minimization Technology (DMT) Monitoring Plan, which is included as a section of the Mill’s Environmental Protection Manual. Said calculations shall be submitted as part of the Annual
Technical Evaluation Report. Said report shall be submitted for Executive Secretary approval no later than November 15 of each year.”
The freeboard limits set out in Section 6.3 of the DMT Plan are intended to capture the
Local 6-hour Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) event, which was determined in
the January 10, 1990 Drainage Report for the White Mesa site to be 10 inches.
Based on the PMP storm event, the freeboard requirement for Cell 1 is a maximum
operating water level of 5615.4 feet above mean sea level (amsl). The Cell 1 freeboard
limit is not affected by operations or conditions in Cells 2, 3 or 4A.

Cells 2 and 3 have no freeboard limit because those Cells are full or near full of tailings solids and all precipitation falling on Cell 2 and 3 and the adjacent drainage area must be
contained in Cell 4A. The flood volume from the PMP event over the Cell 2 and Cell 3
pond areas, plus the adjacent drainage areas, which must be contained in Cell 4A, is
123.4 acre-feet of water.
The flood volume from the PMP event over the Cell 4A area is 36 acre-feet of water (40 acres, plus the adjacent drainage area of 3.25 acres, times the PMP of 10 inches). This
would result in a total flood volume of 159.4 acre-feet, including the 123.4 acre-feet of
solution from Cells 2 and 3, that must be contained in Cell 4A. The procedure for
calculating the freeboard limit for Cell 4A is set out in the DMT Plan.
The Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit, No. UGW370004, for the White Mesa Mill
requires that the minimum freeboard be no less than 3.0 feet for Cells 1 and 4A, but
based on License condition 10.3 and the procedure set out in the DMT Plan, the
freeboard limits for Cells 1 and 4A will be at least three feet.
Figure 7, Hydraulic Profile Schematic, shows the relationship between the Cells, and the
relative elevations of the solution pools and the spillway elevations.

The required freeboard for Cell 4A will be recalculated annually.

Cell 4A BAT Monitoring, Operations and Maintenance Plan 8/10 Revision Denison 1.6

Page 11

Attachments

1) Figure 1, Initial Filling Plan, GeoSyntec Consultants

2) Figure 2, Initial Filling Plan, Details and Sections, GeoSyntec Consultants

3) Figure 3, Initial Filling Plan, Solution and Slurry Pipeline Routes, GeoSyntec Consultants

4) Figure 4, Interim Filling Plan, GeoSyntec Consultants

5) Figure 5, Leak Detection System Sump, GeoSyntec Consultants
6) Figure 6, Leak Detection Sump Operating Elevations

7) Figure 7, Hydraulic Profile Schematic
8) Cell 3 and Cell 4A Freeboard Calculation

9) Table 1, Calculated Action leakage Rates for Various Head Conditions,
Cell 4A, White Mesa Mill, Blanding, Utah, GeoSyntec Consultants
10) White Mesa Mill Tailings Management System and Discharge Minimization
Technology (DMT) Monitoring Plan, 3/07 Revision: DUSA-2, 32 pages, or
currently approved version of the DMT