DRC-2009-005826 - 0901a06880144a9b

t^^'^^C^ ^^0Oq'OOG'^:^.l(.
From: Dave Rupp
To: Loren Morton; Sonja Robinson
CC; Dane Finerfrock
Date: 10/21/2009 11:07 AM
Subject: Fv»/d: FW: Re: Revised Cost estimated for reclamation of White Mesa Mill
Attachments: Ltr.l0_05_09 Finerfrock.pdf
All,
Here is the response from DUSA on our subject RFI of August 17, 2009. Sonja, please log this item Into the system. Thanks.
Dave R.
>>> Steve Landau <SLandau(ia)denisonmines.com> 10/21/2009 11:01 AM >>>
Hello Dave....I received your email requesting that I resend the Revised Cost estimated for reclamation at the White Mesa Mill.
Accordingly, please find attached the email and letter sent to Mr. Finerfrock on October 5, 2009.
Regards,
Steve Landau
Steve Landau
Manager, Environmental Affairs
t: [phone] | f: [phone]
1050 17th Street, Suite 950, Denver, CO 80265
DENISON MINES (USA) CORP
vw/w.denisonmines.com ( http://vwfw.denisonmines.com/1
This e-mail is intended for exclusive use the person(s) mentioned as the recipient(s). This message and any attached files with it
are confidential and may contain privileged or proprietary information. If you are not the intended.recipient(s) please delete this
message and notify the sender. You may not use, distribute print or copy this message if you are not the intended recipient(s).
From:Harold Roberts
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 10:25 AM ,
To: Steve Landau
Subject: FW: Re: Revised Cost estimated for reclamation of White Mesa Mill
Harold Roberts
Executive Vice President, US Operations
t: [phone] | f: [phone]
1050 17th Street, Suite 950, Denver, CO 80265
DENISON MINES (USA) CORP
vwm.denisonmines.com (http://www.denisonmines.com/)
This e-mail is intended for exclusive use the person(s) mentioned as the recipient(s). This message and any attached files with it
are confidential and may contain privileged or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient(s) please delete this
message and notif/ the sender. You may not use, distribute print or copy this message if you are not the intended recipient(s).
From:Harold Roberts
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 5:17 PM
To! Dane Finerfrock
Cc: rhochsteinigdenisonmines.com
Subject: Re: Revised Cost estimated for reclamation of White Mesa Mill
Mr. Finerfrock:
Attached is the revised reclamation cost estimate for the White Mesa Mill and Tailings area, in response to the August 17, 2009
letter from Mr. Dave Rupp.
Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments.
Regards,
DtrtlMti MnM (USA) Corp.
1050 nth 8tr««(, Suit* aso
DENISO^A)ii ST"-""
AAINES T*I:303«28-77M
Fu: 303 381-4125
www.dvnltenmlnN.coni
October 5, 2009
VIA E-MAIL AND OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
Mr. Dane L. Finerfrock
Executive Secretary
Utah Radiation Control Board
Department of Environmental Quality
168 North 1950 West
PO Box 144810
Salt Lake City. Utah 84114-4810
Re: Denison Mines (USA) Corp.
State of Utah 11e.(2) Byproduct Material License # UT1900479
White Mesa Mill, Blanding, Utah
License Condition Number 9.5 - Surety Update - REVISION
Dear Mr. Finerfrock:
Pursuant to License Condition No. 9.5 of State of Utah 11e.(2) Byproduct Material License #UT1900479, please
find enclosed a copy of additional revisions to the revised reclamation and decommissioning cost estimate in
support of the surety bond on the White Mesa Mill. The revision is in response to the August 17, 2009, letter
from Dave Rupp, requesting clarification and additional infonmation on the February 2009 surety update.
Individual comments from Mr. Rupp are restated, in italics, tjelow, followed by an explanation of the changes or
modifications made to the cost estimate.
A. Costs for decommissioning and removal of all additional new tank facilities. DUSA's response to Item
1.a. of our letter of May 21, 2009 stated that, "Additional costs fiave been included in the Mill Decommissioning
section, "Misc. Tankage & Spare Parts Removal", of the estimate, to cover the demolition and disposal of the
newly constructed uranium and vanadium SX feed tanks and the SXraffinate tank. The total manpower and
equipment hours were increased by 50% to cover the additional work effort required.'
Comment: After review of the July 27, 2009 DUSA submittal, it appears the 50% adjustments were erroneously
omitted, and the submitted costs showed a decrease.