DRC-2013-003019 - 0901a068803b27b9

IcJI tVBa. JLH;. SBSA \*\S
'^4 IMS**
State of Utah
GARY R HERBERT
Governor
GREG BELL
Lieutenant Governor
Department of
Environmental Quality
Amanda Smith
Executive Director
DIVISION OF RADIATION CONTROL
Rusty Lundberg
Director
"DRC-2013-003019"
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
FileC-2013-61
Phil Goble, Section Manager
Russell J. Topham, P.E.
August 9,2013
pat? syw/ze^
Engineering Module 73. Inspection of Disposal of Bulk Byproduct Material August 2,
2013. Radioactive Materials License UT1900479 (License) - Energy Fuels Resources
(USA) Inc. (EFR) White Mesa Mill, Blanding, Utah
On August 2 2013,1 performed an inspection of in-situ leach (ISL) waste disposal operations at the White
Mesa uranium mill on behalf of the Utah Division of Radiation Control (DRC). This inspection responds to
a 1 le.(2) Byproduct Receipt Notification from EFR, dated July 17, 2013. EFR is allowed to dispose this
byproduct material in Tailings Cell 3 only, which is allowed by License Condition 10.5 of the EFR
Radioactive Materials License.
On July 17, 2013 DRC received notice that EFR would receive thirteen loads of 1 le.(2) byproduct
material, and intended to dispose of that waste in Cell 3 on August 2, 2013. Seven loads were ultimately
received prior to the commencement of the burial activity.
I checked in at the White Mesa mill at 8:00 a.m. on August 2,2013 and coordinated with mill personnel
this and the biannual dam safety inspections. Soon thereafter I met with Mr. Garrin Palmer and David
Turk, and planned the inspection activities. Mr. Palmer and I proceeded directly to the field to commence
the ISL burial activity.
Material disposed consisted of soil, with occasional incidental pieces of metal, wood or other debris. The
material disposed represented loads from URI Incorporated in Kingsville, Texas, shipped by Greenfield
Logistics, Inc., bearing Shipper Number 13KVD-029, 13KVD-031, and 13KVD-034 through 13KVD-039
(one load had two manifests as it consisted of a truck-and-pup pair.). The bill of lading for each of these
loads appears in the attachments to this report.
The work crew executed the waste disposal in two excavations that extended into the tailings sands, as
evidenced by the spoils adjacent to the excavation, and exposed solution at approximately 24 inches below
the rim of the excavation. Given the elevation of the solution, I could not observe the bottom of the
excavation.
Mr. Palmer surveyed the level at the bottom of the excavations prior to waste placement, employing one of
168 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT
Mailing Address. P.O. Box 144850 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4850
Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone] • T D D. [phone]
www deq Utah gov
Pnnted on 100% recycled paper
Page 2
the equipment operators as a rodman. Using a front-end loader and a small dozer, crews placed the waste in
the excavations and tamped it down to approximately one foot below the top of the excavation. Mr. Palmer
then surveyed the elevation of the top of the waste, and the crews filled the excavation to the top with soil.
The crew track-walked the capping fill to a point where it exhibited no yielding.
EFR appears compliant with Part 10.5.E.(2) of the RML with respect to,the elevation of burial. It appeared
that all provisions of the approved disposal SOP were followed during placement and burial of the bulk
waste, except as previously noted.
Finding: EFR appears to have followed applicable provisions of the RML and of the SOPfor the burial
operation I observed.
Recommendation: I recommend closing out the inspection of August 2, 2013.
Attachments: Photo log, Receipt Notification July 17, 2013, Bill of Lading and Disposal Documentation
for each load disposed on August 2, 2013
W0M ENERG YFUELS
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
6425 South Highway 191. PO Box 809
Blandmg. UT. US, 84511
435 678 2221, fax [phone]
www energyfuels com
July 17, 2013
VIA Electronic Mail (PDF) and UPS
Mr. Rusty Lundberg
Division Director of Radiation Control
State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
PO Box 144830
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Dear Mr. Lundberg,
Re: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Receipt Notification
Pursuant to Radioactive Materials License (RML) UT1900479 condition 10.5.F, Energy Fuels Resources
(USA) Inc. is hereby notifying the Division of Radiation Control that the White Mesa Uranium Mill will be
receiving and disposing of thirteen loads of 1 le.(2) byproduct materials on August 2, 2013.
If there are any questions regarding these shipments or the scheduling of the disposal activities feel free to
contact me at the White Mesa Mill at 435.678.2221.
David Turk
Environmental Health & Safety Manager
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
cc: Denver Central Files
No.: PBL-10
Rev. No.: R-3.1
Date: June 4,2012
DENISON MINES (USA) CORP.
STANDARD OPERATING PROCURES
Title: 1 le,(2) byproduct Disposal
Page 10 of 12
ATTACHMENT 2
lle.(2) BYPRODUCT MAT^Wlt DISMiSAL DOCUMENTATION FORM
Date:
Name of employee receiving the load: ^,,vt.^ fteJ*/^/-
Generator of the Byproduct Material: utz-c wc^c ^Vile.
Was the State of Utah given notice to the receipt/disposal activities associated witii this load? (fe?£r
No
Who gave and when was the notification given?
Description of byproduct material disposal are,a/aptiyities:
Has each drum been inspected to identify the presence of any void spaces? j*/A
Have all drums with void spaces been filled with tailings sands or soil? fi/s/\.
Which tailings ,cell was the material placed in? £-g~U 3 .
Was the material placed on a tailings beach area of the cell or on an area of the cell that was underlain
by tailings sands?
Was the material segregated from any Mill material or equipment disposed of in the cell?
Vc-S '
Was the material segregated from byproduct material from other ISL sources disposed pf in fee cell?,
Yoy \ —•— •
No.: PBL-10
Rev.No.:R-3.1
Date: June 4,2012
DENISON MINES (USA) CORP.
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal
Page 11 of 12
Have the thickness and placement measurements been verified and documented for the disposal area
by the engineer, specifically:
Was the material placed in a cell approved by the executive Secretary
for ISL waste disposal? Yt*
Documentation of approval J^eemc & uTiqctV/q Am">f~
Was the ISL material segregated from disposed Mill material and other
ISL material?
Refer to plat(s) used to confirm. CeJi J- //e.Z W Arc*
Was the maximum lift thickness above tailings less than 4 feet thick?
Was the maximum lift thickness of subsequent lifts less than 2 feet
thick?
Has 4 foot of tailings sands been maintained under each disposal
area? Vc*
Refer to drawings used to confirm Celt 3 6»Aik Dnf,\y4
Is the bottom of each disposal area at least 12 feet from the sides or
dikes of the tailings oell?
Refer to drawings used to confirm. 6*11 3 Comtk fl/ba*i\*ft
Will the elevation of the material exceed the plane or grade of the
elevation of the uppermost flexible membrane liner of the cell? M
How was this confirmed (e.g., survey or review)
Engineer's or
RSO's Initials
How was the area compacted? Was each lift compacted by heavy equipment (such as a Cat D-6) at
least 4 times prior to placement of subsequent lifts?
Were void spaces filled with tailings?
Was the shipment properly covered?
Are additional settlement monitors required to be placed for this generator?
MA
If required, where were settlement markers were placed?
A/A
No.: PBL-10
Rev.No.:R-3.1
Date: June 4,2012
DENTSON MINES (USA) CORP.
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal
Page 12 of 12
A/A
Radiological receipt survey measurements:
Breathing Zone:
1. Was a Breathing Zone Sample collected? Yes or^tfo)
2. If yes, what were the results of the sampling?
Was a photograph taken during the unloading activities?/Yes)or No
URI URI, INC. STRAIGHT BILL OF LADING FOR
BYPRODUCT MATERIAL
RM License No. R03653 Shipment No. 13KVD-029 Trailer* GFLU2142
Seal # n/a
NAME OF CARRIER: Greenfield Logistics DRIVER: ^ JJi
SHIPPER (from) URI, Inc.
STREET 641 E. FM 1118
CITY Kingsville STATE Texas ZIP 78363
COUNTRY USA PHONE [phone]
COSIGNEE (to) Energy Fuels- White Mesa
DESTINATION STREET 6425 S. Hwy 191
CITY Blanding STATE UT ZIP 84511
COUNTRY U.S.A. PHONE [phone]
CONTENTS
EXCLUSIVE USE SHIPMENT
***These contents are contaminated with natural uranium and its daughters 226Ra and 230Th ***
PROPER SHIPPING NAME: RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL L.S.A 1.
HAZARD CLASS: J
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: UN 2912
WEIGHT: Tare 44.000 lbs. NET 29.206 lbs. GROSS 73.206 lbs.
EMERGENCY CONTACTS 24 HOUR
CHEMTREC: 800-424-9300 password: URI
URI DISTRICT: 361-331-5585 (Joshua Holland)
URI HEADQUARTERS: 214-683-8889 (Mark Pelizza)
SHIPPER'S CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the above materials are properly classified, described, packaged, marked, placarded and labeled,
and are in proper condition for transportation according to the applicable regulations of the Department of
Transportation. THIS VEHICLE IS CONSIDERED A PACKAGE IN COMPLIANCE WITH 49 CFR 173.427 (c)
Shipper's Signature A ~ 7~Z ~~ I Date
CARRIER'S CERTIFICATION
Carrier acknowledges receipt of packages and required placards. Carrier certifies emergency response information
was made available and has the appropriate emergency response document in the vehicle. Department of
Transportation.
Driver's Signature
Cosignee's Signature /
GNEE
Date
*s RECIEPT of SHIPMENT
Date
J.
No.: PBL-10
Rev. No.:R-3.1
Date: June 4,2012
DENISON MINES (USA) CO%P,
STANDARD OPE^TLNfG PROCEDURES
Title: 1 ler(2) Byproduct Pisposal ,
Page 10 of 12
ATTACHMENT 2
lle.(2) BYPRODUCT MATEKEAL tilSMSAL DOCUMENTATION FORM
Date: _3j^2_Ll3__
Name of employee receiving the load: £~ P^l***^«-
Generator of the Byproduct Material: \L\^Sti\<
Was the State of Utah given notice to the receipt/disposal activities associated with this loa4?(X£s)or
No
Who gave and when was the notification given?
Cw.A TL>,>v:v T,dy J\ lotT B
——————————————— ' f-
Description of byproduct material disposal area/aptiYities:
kfrh • • - r-, r- :
pl^Vrr-r f^A. p It^JL t~g- _ , " '—'TTT-I ••
Has each drum been inspected to identify liie presence of any void spaces? —:
Have all drums with void spaces been filled with tailings sands or soil? ^/J*
Which tailings cell was the material placed in? C LI ."3 .
Was the material placed on a tailings beach area of the cell or on an area of the cell that was underlain
by tailings sands?
Was the material segregated from any Mill material or equipment disposed of in the cell?
Yes '
Was the material segregated from byproduct material from other ISL sources disposed. of in the cell?
—^ : _ ——
No.: PBL-10
Rev. No.: R-3.1
Date: June 4,2012
DENISON MINES (USA) CORP.
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal
Page 11 of 12
Have the thickness and placement measurements been verified and documented for the disposal area
by the engineer, specifically:
Was the material placed in a cell approved by the executive Secretary
for ISL waste disposal?
Documentation of approval livr^ *f £AT rt0o<t7<9 An^f
Was the ISL material segregated from disposed Mill material and other
ISL material?
Refer to plat(s) used to confirm. Ct/t .3 ///. Z 0,^*74*. ( 4r*4.
Was the maximum lift thickness above tailings less than 4 feet thick?
Was the maximum lift thickness of subsequent lifts less than 2 feet
thick?
Has 4 foot of tailings sands been maintained under each disposal
area? fey
Refer to drawings used to confkm_jW/£ 6*n<sk /)m~Ayt
Is the bottom of each disposal area at least 12 feet from the sides or
dikes of the tailings oell? -^r
Refer to drawings used to confirm. 3 /)s*.i*s/w&
Will the elevation of the material exceed the plane or grade of the
elevation of the uppermost flexible membrane liner of the cell?
How was this confirmed (e.g., survey or review)
Engineer's or
RSO's Initials
How was the area compacted? Was each lift compacted by heavy equipment (such as a Cat D-6) at
least 4 times prior to placement of subsequent lifts?
Were void spaces filled with tailings?
±SS
Was the shipment properly covered?
iAl
Are additional settlement monitors required to be placed for this generator?
AlA
If required, where were settlement markers were placed?
A/A
No.: PBL-10
Rev.No.:R-3.1
Date: June 4,2012
DENISON MINES (USA) CORP.
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal
Page 12 of 12
ASM
Radiological receipt survey measurements:
Breathing Zone:
1. Was a Breathing Zone Sample collected? Yes or(£?o J
2. If yes, what were the results of the sampling?
Was a photograph taken during the unloading activities? /Tesjor No
URI URL INC. STRAIGHT BILL OF LADING FOR
BYPRODUCT MATERIAL
RM License No. R03653 Shipment No 13KVD-031 Traifer#GFLU001187
Date: 7/15/2013 Seal # n/a
NAME OF CARRIER: Greenfield Logistics DRIVER: X H&ki Gicx^f^r
SHIPPER (from) URI, Inc.
STREET 641 E. FM 1118
CITY KingsvMle STATE Texas ZIP 78363
COUNTRY USA PHONE [phone]
COSIGNEE (to) Energy Fuels- White Mesa Mill
DESTINATION STREET 6425 S. Hwy 191
CITY Blanding STATE UT ZIP 84511
COUNTRY U.S.A. PHONE [phone]
CONTENTS
EXCLUSIVE USE SHIPMENT
These contents are contaminated with natural uranium and its daughters 226Ra and 230Th
PROPER SHIPPING NAME' RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL LS.A 1.
HAZARD CLASS 7
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER. UN 2912
WEIGHT: Tare 44.000 lbs. NET 29.844 lbs. GROSS 73.844 lbs.
EMERGENCY CONTACTS 24 HOUR
CHEMTREC: 800-424-9300 password: URt
URI DISTRICT: 361-331-5585 (Joshua Holland)
URI HEADQUARTERS: 214-683-8889 (Mark Petizza)
SHIPPER'S CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the above materials are properly classified, described, packaged, marked, placarded and labeled,
and are in proper condrtion for transportation according to the applicable regulations of the Department of
Transportation. THIS VEHICLE IS CONSIDERED A PACKAGE IN COMPLIANCE WITH 49 CFR 173.427 (c)
Shipper's Signature
7/
Date
7/15/2013
CARRIER'S CERTIFICATION
Carrier acknowledges receipt of packages and required placards. Carrier certifies emergency response information
was made available and has the appropriate emergency response document rn the vehicle. Department of
Transportation
Driver's Signature Date
CONSIGNEE'S RECIEPT of SHIPMENT
Cosignee's Signature Date
No.: PBL-10
Rev. No.:R-3.1
Date: June 4,2012
DENISON MINES (USA) CORP.
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
Title: 1 le,(2) Byproduct Disposal
Page 10 of 12
ATTACHMENT 2
lle.(2) BYPRODUCT MATERIAL DISPOSAL DOCUMENTATION FORM
Date: -7 1 ±1 \\Z
Name of employee receiving the load: T^.r^y £IAJ>£-
Generator of the Byproduct Material: t^r, yil^t
Was the State of Utah given notice to the receipt/disposal activities associated with this load^Yesbr
No
Who gave and when was the notification given?
Description of byproduct material disposal area/activities:
—SJ^C—pU^ fas r^^A. ^> i f- 4—-Vg
Has each drum been inspected to identify the presence of any void spaces? AJA -
Have all drums with void spaces been filled with tailings sands or soil?, /(/A .
Which tailings cell was the material placed in? Lr \\ T
Was the material placed on a tailings beach area of the cell or on an area of the cell that was underlain
by tailings sands?
Was the material segregated from any Mill material or equipment disposed of in the cell?
Was the material segregated from byproduct material from other ISL sources disposed of in the cell?
Yx£ '.
No.: PBL-10
Rev.No.:R-3.1
Date: June 4,2012
DENISON MINES (USA) CORP. ,
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal
Page 11 of 12
Have the thickness and placement measurements been verified and documented for the disposal area
by the engineer, specifically:
Was the material placed in a cell approved by the executive Secretary
for ISL waste disposal? jej
Documentation of approval # «r/tGo*f?H #«*tf~
Was the ISL material segregated from disposed Mill material and other
ISL material? Y«
Refer to plat(s) used to confirm. Ctt/ J /fe.Z l?tty*&l_Arct*
Was the maximum lift thickness above tailings less than 4 feet thick? &
Was the maximum lift thickness of subsequent lifts less than 2 feet
thick?
Has 4 foot of tailings sands been maintained under each disposal
area? Ife<
Refer to drawings used to confirm C*M 3 C**<st J)rg,**fo^j
Is the bottom of each disposal area at least 12 feet from the sides or
dikes of the tailings oell?
Refer to drawings used to confirm. C*/l 3 Of*~-irtjj
Will the elevation of the material exceed the plane or grade of the
elevation of the uppermost flexible membrane liner of the cell?
confirmed How was this (e.g., survey or review)
Engineer's or
RSO's Initials
4L
How was the area compacted? Was each lift compacted by heavy equipment (such as a Cat D-6) at
least 4 times prior to placement of subsequent lifts?
Were void spaces filled with tailings?
Yes
Was the shipment properly covered?
Y^i
Are additional settlement monitors required to be placed for this generator?
dzA
If required, where were settlement markers were placed?
/I/A-
logical
eyme
P ents
Br
Zone
Br, If Zo yes ne Sa *hat Were the coil* Stilts Ye ofth or sampi
as a Phot °graph take
the unload
activiti es? es No
URi URI, INC. STRAIGHT BILL OF LADING FOR
BYPRODUCT MATERIAL
RM License No. R03653 Shipment No. 13KVD-034 Trailer #GFLU001088
Date: 7/19/2013 Seal # n/a
NAME OF CARRIER: Greenfield Logistics DRIVER: k^~7eM
SHIPPER (from) URI, Inc.
STREET 641 E. FM1118
CITY Kingsville STATE Texas ZIP 78363
COUNTRY USA PHONE [phone]
COSIGNEE (to) Energy Fuels- White Mesa
DESTINATION STREET 6425 S. Hwy 191
CITY Blanding STATE UT ZIP 84511
COUNTRY U.S.A. PHONE [phone]
CONTENTS
EXCLUSIVE USE SHIPMENT
fc**These contents are contaminated with natural uranium and its daughters ^Ra and ^h ***
PROPER SHIPPING NAME: RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL L.S.A 1.
HAZARD CLASS' 7
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: UN 2912
WEIGHT: Tare 44.000 lbs. NET 31.361 lbs. GROSS 75.361 lbs.
EMERGENCY CONTACTS 24 HOUR
CHEMTREC: 800-424-9300 password: URI
URI DISTRICT: 361-331-5585 (Joshua Holland)
URI HEADQUARTERS: 214-683-8889 (Mark Pelizza)
SHIPPER'S CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the above materials are properly classified, described, packaged, marked, placarded and labeled,
and are in proper condition for transportation according to the applicable regulations of the Department of
Transportation. THIS VEHICLE IS CONSIDERED A PACKAGE IN COMPLIANCE WITH 49 CFR 173.427 (c)
Shipper's Signature Date
7/19/2013
CARRIER'S CERTIFICATION
Carrier acknowledges receipt of packages and required placards. Carrier certifies emergency response information
was made available and has the appropriate emergency response document in the vehicle. Department of
Transportation.
Driver's Signature
72
Date
CONSIGNEE'S RECIEPT of SHIPMENT
Cosignee's Signature
ft
Date
~7~ 77-15
No.: PBL-10
Rev. No.:R-3.1
Date: June 4,2012
DENISON.MDSfES (USA) CORP.
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal Page 10 of 12
ATTACHMENT 2
lle.(2) BYPRODUCT MATERIAL ftiSMSAL DOCUMENTATION FORM
Date: -7(17(1^
Name of employee receiving the load: PA^cr
Generator of the Byproduct Material: UETI iA.:^o»lld.
Was the State of Utah given notice to the receipt/disposal activities associated with this load9£YesV
Who gaye and when was the notification given?
Description of byproduct material disposal area/activities:
b>rv ; '" ;r " - '
—Sir • fWtr?S r~^X ^UfT-g, ' . , -
Has each drum been inspected to identify the presence of any void spaces? A
Have all drums with void spaces been filled with tailings sands or soil? MA .
Which tailmgs cell was the material placed in? CcAi T .
Was the material placed on a tailings beach area of the cell of on an area of the cell that was underlain
by tailings sands?
Was the material segregated from any Mill material or equipment disposed of in the cell?
Was the material segregated from byproduct material from other ISL sources disposed of in the cell?,
No.: PBL-10
Rev. No.: R-3.1
Date: June 4,2012
DENISON MINES (USA) CORP.
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal
Page 11 of 12
Have the thickness and placement measurements been verified and documented for the disposal area
by the engineer, specifically:
Engineer's or
RSO's Initials
Was the material placed in a cell approved by the executive Secretary
for ISL waste disposal?
Documentation of approval l*ce«& #JuT IW74 f
Was the ISL material segregated from disposed Mill material and other
ISL material? _K£
Refer to plat(s) used to confirm. Cell 3 l/e. Z 0/^%&<l 4r<«
Was the maximum lift thickness above tailings less man 4 feet thick?
Was the maximum lift thickness of subsequent lifts less than 2 feet
thick?
Has 4 foot of tailings sands been maintained under each disposal
area? fcj
Refer to drawings used to confirm fltfl 3 Cmt Onf'/itts
Is the bottom of each disposal area at least 12 feet from the sides or
dikes of the tailings oell? Ye3
Refer to drawings used to confirm, foil 3 Co»*l. 0r««swjf
Will the elevation of the material exceed the plane or grade of the
elevation of the uppermost flexible membrane liner of the cell?
this How was confirmed (e.g., survey or review)
How was the area compacted? Was each lift compacted by heavy equipment (such as a Cat D-6) at
least 4 times prior to placement of subsequent lifts?
Were void spaces filled with tailings?
Was the shipment properly covered?
*CA
Are additional settlement monitors required to be placed for this generator?
tVfc . ,
If required, where were settlement markers were placed?
/y/A
No.: PBL-10
Rev. No.: R-3.1
Date: June 4,2012
DENISON MINES (USA) CORP.
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal
Page 12 of 12
A/A
Radiological receipt survey measurements:
Breathing Zone:
1. Was a Breathing Zone Sample collected? Yesoi^C;
2. If yes, what were the results of the sampling?
Was a photograph taken during the unloading activities? /Yesjor No
URI URI, INC. STRAIGHT BILL OF LADING FOR
BYPRODUCT MATERIAL
RM License No. R03653 Shipment No. 13KVD-035 Trailer* GFLU001099
Date: 7/24/2013 Seal # n/a
NAME OF CARRIER: Greenfield Logistics DRIVER: Tifty fj^y^J^
SHIPPER (from) URI, Inc.
STREET 641 E. FM1118
CITY Kingsville STATE Texas ZIP 78363
COUNTRY USA PHONE [phone]
COSIGNEE (to) Energy Fuels- White Mesa
DESTINATION STREET 6425 S. Hwy 191
CITY Blanding STATE UT ZIP 84511
COUNTRY U.S.A. PHONE [phone]
CONTENTS
EXCLUSIVE USE SHIPMENT
These contents are contaminated with natural uranium and its daughters 226Ra and 230Th
PROPER SHIPPING NAME: RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL LS.A 1.
HAZARD CLASS" 7
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: UN 2912
WEIGHT: Tare 44.000 lbs. NET 31.975 lbs. GROSS 75.975 lbs.
EMERGENCY CONTACTS 24 HOUR
CHEMTREC: 800-424-9300 password: URI
URI DISTRICT: 361-331-5585 (Joshua Holland)
URI HEADQUARTERS: 214-683-8889 (Mark Pelizza)
SHIPPER'S CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the above materials are properly classified, described, packaged, marked, placarded and labeled,
and are in proper condition for transportation according to the applicable regulations of the Department of
Transportation. THIS VEHICLE IS CONSIDERED A PACKAGE IN COMPLIANCE WITH 49 CFR 173.427 (c)
Shipper's Signature Date
7/24/2013
~7f 9 CARRIER'S CERTIFICATION
Carrier acknowledge^eceipt of packages and required placards. Carrier certifies emergency response information
was made available and has the appropriate emergency response document in the vehicle. Department of
Transportation.
Driver's Signature Date
CONSIGNEE'S REC1EPT of SHIPMENT
Cosignee's Signature Date
l\Zl fax
No.: PBL-10
Rev. No.:R-3.1
Date: June 4,2012
DENISON MINES (USA) CORP.
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal
Page 10 of 12
ATTACHMENT 2
lle.(2) BYPRODUCT MATERIAL DISPOSAL DOCUMENTATION FORM
Date:
Name of employee receiving the load: A^*,^ PA I^V^/-
Generator of the Byproduct Material: /J?fL H V^.^SLTU^
Was the State of Utah given notice to the receipt/disposal activities associated with this load?£?e| or
No
Who gave and when was the notification given?
Description of byproduct material disposal area/activities:
See- pU^4-o pUAlc
Has each drum been inspected to identify the presence of any void spaces? A/A
Have all drums with void spaces been filled with tailings sands or soil? A/A
Which tailings cell was the material placed in? /Ifcll %
c
Was the material placed on a tailings beach area of the cell or on an area of the cell that was underlain
by tailings sands?
Was the material segregated from any Mill material or equipment disposed of in the cell?
1o>
Was the material segregated from byproduct material from other ISL sources disposed of in the cell?
rV>
No.: PBL-10
Rev. No.:R-3.1
Date: June 4,2012
DENISON MINES (USA) CQRP.
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal
Page 11 of 12
Have the thickness and placement measurements been verified and documented for the disposal area
by the engineer, specifically:
Was the material placed in a cell approved by the executive Secretary
for ISL waste disposal? «#
Documentation of approval Li*t»4t #HT fWf?9 A**tf
Was the ISL material segregated from disposed Mill material and other
ISL material?
Refer to plat(s) used to confirm. &//3 fft* I Aqaejo/
Was the maximum lift thickness above tailings less than 4 feet thick?
Was the maximum lift thickness of subsequent lifts less than 2 feet
thick?
Has 4 foot of tailings sands been maintained under each disposal
area? Yef
Refer to drawings used to confirm 6eff 3 £6**f. rfs>**sthff
Is the bottom of each disposal area at least 12 feet from the sides or
dikes of the tailings oell?.
Refer to drawings used to confirm, telf 3 h Or+*sfajt?
Will the elevation of the material exceed the plane or grade of the
elevation of the uppermost flexible membrane liner of the cell?
How was this confirmed (e.g., survey or review)
Engineer's or
RSO's Initials
4?
How was the area compacted? Was each lift compacted by heavy equipment (such as a Cat D-6) at
least 4 times prior to placement of subsequent lifts?
Were void spaces filled with tailings?
Was the shipment properly covered?
1^1
Are additional settlement monitors required to be placed for this generator?
A/A .
If required, where were settlement markers were placed?
A/A
No.: PBL-10
Rev. No.: R-3.1
Date: June 4,2012
DENISON MINES (USA) CORP.
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
Title: lie (2) Byproduct Disposal
Page 12 of 12
//A
Radiological receipt survey measurements:
./L T*n>
Breathing Zone:
1. Was a Breathing Zone Sample collected? Yes or^Nlc)
2. If yes, what were the results of the sampling?
Was a photograph taken during the unloading activities? / Yesor No
URI URI, INC. STRAIGHT BILL OF LADING FOR
BYPRODUCT MATERIAL
RM License No. R03653 Shipment No. 13KVD-036 Trailer* GFLU2119
Date: 7/19/2013 Seal # n/a
NAME OF CARRIER: Greenfield Logistics DRIVER: V ^TZscLd Gnajt&Q
SHIPPER (from) URI, Inc.
STREET 641 E. FM 1118
CITY Kingsville STATE Texas ZIP 78363
COUNTRY USA PHONE [phone]
COSIGNEE (to) Energy Fuels- White Mesa
DESTINATION STREET 6425 S. Hwy 191
CITY Blanding STATE UT ZIP 84511
COUNTRY U.S.A. PHONE [phone]
CONTENTS
EXCLUSIVE USE SHIPMENT
These contents are contaminated with natural uranium and its daughters Ra and "uTh
PROPER SHIPPING NAME: RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL L.S.A 1.
HAZARD CLASS: _7
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: UN 2912
WEIGHT: Tare 44.000 lbs. NET 30.009 lbs. GROSS 74.009 lbs.
EMERGENCY CONTACTS 24 HOUR
CHEMTREC: 800-424-9300 password: URI
URI DISTRICT: 361-331-5585 (Joshua Holland)
URI HEADQUARTERS: 214-683-8889 (Mark Pelizza)
SHIPPER'S CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the above materials are properly classified, described, packaged, marked, placarded and labeled,
and are in proper condition for transportation according to the applicable regulations of the Department of
Transportation. THIS VEHICLE IS CONSIDERED A PACKAGE IN COMPLIANCE WITH 49 CFR 173.427 (c)
Shipper's Signature Date
7/19/2013
ARRIER's CERTIFICATION
Carrier acknowledges receipt of packages and required placards. Carrier certifies emergency response information
was made available and has the appropriate emergency response document in the vehicle. Department of
Transportation.
Driver's Signature Date
CONSIGNEE'S RECIEPT of SHIPMENT
Cosignee's Signature Date
"7
No.: PBL-10
Rev. No.: R-3.1
Date: June 4,2012
DENISON MINES (USA) CORP.
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
Title: 1 le,(2) byproduct Disposal
Page 10 of 12
ATTACHMENT 2
Ue.(2) BYPRODUCT MATERIAL DISPOSAL DOCUMENTATION FORM
Date: l\
Name of employee receiving the load: ^r»:«. PcJr^es-
Generator of the Byproduct Material: unrt u^c^ilr
Was the State of Utah given notice to the receipt/disposal activities associated with this load? (Tfespr No - •
Who gave and when was the notification given?
Description of byproduct material disposal area/activities:
Has each drum been inspected to identify the presence of any void spaces? A/A
Have all drums with void spaces been filled with tailings sands or soil? _ A/A
Which tailings cell was the material placed in? T
Was the material placed on a tailings beach area of the cell or on an area of the cell that was underlain
by tailings sands?
A^ft~Vfcr-«*A iAi to thrift-A ^
Was the material segregated from any Mill material or equipment disposed of in the cell?
Was the material segregated from byproduct material from other ISL sources disposed of in the cell?,
AZA " ~~~
No.: PBL-10
Rev.No.:R-3.1
Date: June 4,2012
DENISON MINES (USA) CORP.
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
Title: 11 e.(2) Byproduct Disposal
Page 11 of 12
Have the thickness and placement measurements been verified and documented for the disposal area
by the engineer, specifically:
Was the material placed in a cell approved by the executive Secretary
for ISL waste disposal? iti
Documentation of approval Jjte&e & uf /W7y Awf
Was the ISL material segregated from disposed Mill material and other
ISL material? Yes
Refer to plat(s) used to confirm. 3 //>. Z fryfoaj 4^*4
Was the maximum lift thickness above tailings less than 4 feet thick?
Was the maximum lift thickness of subsequent lifts less than 2 feet
thick?
Has 4 foot of tailings sands been maintained under each disposal
area? fa
Refer to drawings used to confirm 6tfl 3 Or*. vfijiS
Is the bottom of each disposal area at least 12 feet from the sides or
dikes of the tailings oell? Yrj
Refer to drawings used to confirm. £t//3 AMI* O^a^i^
Will the elevation of the material exceed the plane or grade of the
elevation of the uppermost flexible membrane liner of the cell?
A/o
review) How was this confirmed (e.g., survey or
Engineer's or
RSO's Initials
How was the area compacted? Was each lift compacted by heavy equipment (such as a Cat D~6) at
least 4 times prior to placement of subsequent lifts?
Were void spaces filled with tailings?
y^j
Was the shipment properly covered?
Are additional settlement monitors required to be placed for this generator?
If required, where were settlement markers were placed?
A/A
No.: PBL-10
Rev. No.: R-3.1
Date: June 4,2012
DENTSON MINES (USA) CORP.
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
Title: 11 e.(2) Byproduct Disposal
Page 12 of 12
A/ A
Radiological receipt survey measurements:
Breathing Zone:
1. Was a Breathing Zone Sample collected? Yesoi^NoJ)
2. If yes, what were the results of the sampling?
Was a photograph taken during the unloading activitiesyYesp: No
URI URI, INC. STRAIGHT BILL OF LADING FOR
BYPRODUCT MATERIAL
RM License No. R03653 Shipment No. 13KVD-037 Trailer* GFLU0011551
Date: 7/24/2013 Seal # n/a
NAME OF CARRIER: Greenfield Logistics DRIVER: ^7^4di GCL^L
SHIPPER (from) URI, Inc.
STREET 641 E. FM 1118
CITY Kingsville STATE Texas ZIP 78363
COUNTRY USA PHONE [phone]
COSIGNEE (to) Energy Fuels- White Mesa Mill
DESTINATION STREET 6425 S. Hwy 191
CITY Blanding STATE UT ZIP 84511
COUNTRY U.S.A. PHONE [phone]
CONTENTS
EXCLUSIVE USE SHIPMENT
These contents are contaminated with natural uranium and its daughters 226Ra and 230Th
PROPER SHIPPING NAME: RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL L.S.A 1.
HAZARD CLASS" 7
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: UN 2912
WEIGHT: Tare 44.000 lbs. NET 30.749 lbs. GROSS 74.749 lbs.
EMERGENCY CONTACTS 24 HOUR
CHEMTREC: 800-424-9300 password: URI
URI DISTRICT: 361-331-5585 (Joshua Holland)
URI HEADQUARTERS: 214-683-8889 (Mark Pelizza)
SHIPPER'S CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the above materials are properly classified, described, packaged, marked, placarded and labeled,
and are in proper condition for transportation according to the applicable regulations of the Department of
Transportation. THIS VEHICLE IS CONSIDERED A PACKAGE IN COMPLIANCE WITH 49 CFR 173.427 (c)
Shipper's Signature Date
7/24/2013
CARRIER'S CERTIFICATION
Carrier acknowledges receipt of packages and required placards. Carrier certifies emergency response information
was made available and has the appropriate emergency response document in the vehicle. Department of
Transportation.
Dnver's Signature Date i .
CONSIGNEE'S RECIEPT of SHIPMENT
Cosignee's Signature Date
No.: PBL-10
Rev. No.: R-3.1
Date: June 4.2012
DENISON MINES (USA) CORP.
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal
Page 10 of 12
ATTACHMENT 2
lle.(2) BYPRODUCT MATERIAL filSP^SAL DOCUMENTATION FORM
Date; tf/t/i*,
Name of employee receiving the load: DM\JlZ^k
Generator of the Byproduct Material: DfZJ- k\^>»lttc
Was the State of Utah given notice to the receipt/disposal activities associated with this load?CYesJ)r
No *
Who gave and when was the notification given?
MM 43-
Descriptioi* of byproduct material disposal area/aptivitjes:
Has each drum been inspected to identify the presence of any void spaces? Hh~
Have all drums with void spaces been filled with tailings sands or soil?
Which tailings cell was the material placed in? Colli?
Was the material placed on a tailings oeach area of the cell of on an area of the cell that was underlain
by tailings sands?
Was the material segregated from any Mill material or equipment disposed of in the cell?
iiA
Was the material segregated from byproduct material from other ISL sources disposed of in the cell?
No.: PBL-10
Rev.No.:R-3.1
Date: June 4,2012
DENISON MINES (USA) CORP.
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
Title: lle.(2) Byproduct Disposal
Page 11 of 12
Have the thickness and placement measurements been verified and documented for the disposal area
by the engineer, specifically:
Engineer's or
RSO's Initials
Was the material placed in a cell approved by the executive Secretary
for ISL waste disposal? Vts
Documentation of approval Lfctnst 4l ur/Wf71 A^mf
Was the ISL material segregated from disposed Mill material and other
ISL material?
Refer to plat(s) used to confirm. Celt 3 0ttyc*«f Ar*h
Was the maximum lift thickness above tailings less than 4 feet thick? g
Was the maximum lift thickness of subsequent lifts less than 2 feet
thick?
Has 4 foot of tailings sands been maintained under each disposal
area? V*/
Refer to drawings used to confirm Ct/t 3 C*n*}. Dra^^J
Is the bottom of each disposal area at least 12 feet from the sides or
dikes of the tailings oell? Yej
Refer to drawings used to confirm. \Ce/f 3 &»t.fk Dr+^^i
Will the elevation of the material exceed the plane or grade of the
elevation of the uppermost flexible membrane liner of the cell?
A4_
How was this confirmed (e.g., survey or review)
How was the area compacted? Was each lift compacted by heavy equipment (such as a Cat D-6) at
least 4 times prior to placement of subsequent lifts?
Were void spaces filled with tailings?
Was the shipment properly covered?
to
Are additional settlement monitors required to be placed for this generator?
^
If required, where were settlement markers were placed?
A/A
No.: PBL-10
Rev. No.: R-3.1
Date: June 4,2012
DENTSON MINES (USA) CORP.
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal
A/A
Page 12 of 12
f
Radiological receipt survey measurements:
L ?XT>
Breathing Zone:
1. Was a Breathing Zone Sample collected? Yesoi(No)
2. If yes, what were the results of the sampling?
Was a photograph taken during the unloading activities? Q^es or No
, ••*~s '
URI URI, INC. STRAIGHT BILL OF LADING FOR
BYPRODUCT MATERIAL
Shipment No. 13KVD-038&39 Trailer #C Of lU 1 I ' f RM License No. R03653 Date: 7/31/2013 Seal # n/a
NAME OF CARRIER: Greenfield Logistics DRIVER>C M 61*
SHIPPER (from) URI, Inc.
STREET 641 E. FM 1118
CITY Kingsville STATE Texas ZIP 78363
COUNTRY USA PHONE [phone]
COSIGNEE (to) Energy Fuels- White Mesa Mill
DESTINATION STREET 6425 S. Hwy 191
CITY Blanding STATE UT ZIP 84511
COUNTRY U.S.A. PHONE [phone]
CONTENTS
EXCLUSIVE USE SHIPMENT
These contents are contaminated with natural uranium and its daughters 226Ra and 230Th
PROPER SHIPPING NAME: RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL L.S.A 1.
HAZARD CLASS* 7
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: UN 2912
WEIGHT: Tare 44.000 lbs. NET lbs. GROSS lbs.
EMERGENCY CONTACTS 24 HOUR
CHEMTREC: 800-424-9300 password: URI
URI DISTRICT: 361-331-5585 (Joshua Holland)
URI HEADQUARTERS: 214-683-8889 (Mark Pelizza)
SHIPPER'S CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the above materials are properly classified, described, packaged, marked, placarded and labeled,
and are in proper condition for transportation according to the applicable regulations of the Department of
Transportation. THIS VEHICLE IS CONSIDERED A PACKAGE IN COMPLIANCE WITH 49 CFR 173.427 (c)
Shipper's Signature Date
7/31/2013
CARRIER'S CERTIFICATION
Carrier acknowledges
was made available
Transportation.
£ipt of packages and required placards. Carrier certifies emergency response information
has the appropriate emergency response document in the vehicle. Department of
Driver's Signature Date
CONSIGNEE'S RECIEPT of SHIPMENT
Cosignee's Signature Date
Photo 1. One of two excavations to receive 1 le.(2) material for burial. Photo taken 8:58 a.m.
August 2, 2013.
Photo 2. One of two excavations to receive 11 e.(2) material for burial. Photo taken 8:59 a.m.
August 2, 2013.
P EST
3*
m
•v. X.
Photo 3. Introducing the 1 le.(2) material into the excavation. Photo taken 8:57 a.m. August 2,
2013.
Photo 4. Introducing the 11 e.(2) material into the excavation. Photo taken 9:00 a.m. August 2,
2013.
Photo 5. Placing cover soil over waste. Photo taken 9:23 a.m. August 2, 2013.
../r.-./.'-x'il.v
Photo 7. Cover soil placed and densified by track-walking. View is from northeast. Photo taken
9:40 a.m. August 2,2013.
Photo 6. Cover soil placed and densified by track-walking. View is from southeast. Photo taken
9:34 a.m. August 2,2013.
: •
Photo 8. Documentary view of worksite. Primary burial took place in an excavation to the left of
and behind the visible spoils pile. The second excavation, which received veiy little waste, was
to the right of the spoils pile.. Photo taken 9:47 a.m. August 2, 2013.