Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDRC-2014-001244 - 0901a068803f92dcState of Utah GARY R HERBERT Governor GREG BELL Lieutenant Governor Department of Environmental Quality Amanda Smith Executive Director DIVISION OF RADIATION CONTROL Rusty Lundberg Director DRC-2014-001244 MEMORANDUM TO: THROUGH: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: File C-2013-61 Phil Goble, Section Manager ^V//3 Russell J. Topham, P.E. l/^1 ^ January 14, 2014 Engineering Module 73. Inspection of Disposal of Bulk Byproduct Material November 22, 2013. Radioactive Materials License UT1900479 (License) - Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. (EFR) White Mesa Mill, Blanding, Utah On November 22, 2013,1 performed an inspection of in-situ leach (ISL) waste disposal operations at the White Mesa uranium mill on behalf of the Utah Division of Radiation Control (DRC). This inspection responds to a 1 le.(2) Byproduct Receipt Notification from EFR, dated October 30, 2013. EFR is allowed to dispose this byproduct material in Tailings Cell 3 only, which is allowed by License Condition 10.5 of the EFR Radioactive Materials License. On October 30,2013 the DRC received notice that EFR would receive thirteen loads of 1 le.(2) byproduct material, and intended to dispose of that waste in Cell 3 on November 22, 2013. Eight loads were ultimately received prior to the commencement of the burial activity. I checked in at the White Mesa mill at 7:00 a.m. on November 22, 2013 and coordinated with mill personnel this inspection and the annual DMT inspection. Soon thereafter I met with Mr. Garrin Palmer and Mr. David Turk, and planned the inspection activities. Mr. Palmer and I proceeded directly to the field to commence the DMT inspection inasmuch as a load of ISL material was expected to arrive by mid- morning. At about 9:00 a.m. the load arrived, and work on the DMT inspection was suspended to conduct the ISL burial activity. Material disposed consisted of: • Soil, with occasional incidental pieces of metal, wood or other debris from URI Incorporated in Kingsville, Texas, shipped by Greenfield Logistics, bearing Shipper Number 13KVD-061, (one load); • Soil, with occasional incidental pieces of metal, wood or other debris from URI Incorporated in Kingsville, Texas, shipped by Energy Evolutions, bearing Shipper Number 13KVD-068, and 13KVD-071 through 13KVD-074, (five loads); 168 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT Mailing Address P O Box 144850 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4850 Telephone (801) 536^250 • Fax (801) 533-4097 • T D D (801) 536-4414 www deq Utah gov Printed on 100% recycled paper Page 2 • Drummed waste from South Texas Mining in Hobson, Texas, shipped by Cosby Trucking, bearing Shipper Number UEC Mount (one load); • Drummed waste and loose debris from South Texas Mining in Benavides, Texas, shipped by Cosby Trucking, bearing Shipper Number UEC LU (one load). The bill of lading for each of these loads appears in the attachments to this report. The work crew executed the waste disposal in three excavations that extended into the tailings sands, as evidenced by the spoils adjacent to the excavation, and exposed solution at approximately 36 inches below the rim of the excavation. Given the elevation of the solution, I could not observe the bottom of the excavations. Mr. Palmer surveyed the level at the bottom of the excavations prior to waste placement, employing one of the equipment operators as a rodman. Using a front-end loader and a small dozer, crews placed the waste in the excavations and tamped it down to approximately one foot below the top of the excavation. Mr. Palmer then surveyed the elevation of the top of the waste, and the crews filled the excavation to the top with soil. The crew track-walked the capping fill to a point where it exhibited no yielding. EFR appears compliant with Part 10.5.E.(2) of the RML with respect to the elevation of burial. It appeared that all provisions of the approved disposal SOP were followed during placement and burial of the bulk waste. Finding: EFR appears to have followed applicable provisions of the RML and of the SOP for the burial operation I observed. Recommendation: I recommend closing out the inspection of November 22, 2013. Attachments: Photo log, Receipt Notification July 17,2013, Bill of Lading and Disposal Documentation for each load disposed on November 22, 2013 Photo 1. Truck bearing ISL matenals received on paved portion of ore pad Rain made taking the truck to the burial location problematic Photo taken November 22,2013 Photo 3 Discharging ISL material to pavement Photo taken November 22,2013 Photo 2 Discharging ISL material to pavement Photo taken November 22,2013 3fc m as •ass 35 m *3E a*: 3£ m 0 Photo 4 Terry Slade taking radiological measurements on the material Photo taken November 22,2013 Photo 5 Surveying bottom of one of three excavations used to dispose of matenal this day Photo taken November 22,2013 Photo 7 Placing material m one of the excavations Photo taken November 22,2013 amm. "WrM Photo 6 Placing matenal in one of the excavations Photo taken November 22,2013 1 IS 2 Photo 8 Placement and grooming and densification of cover soil Photo taken November 22, 2013 ENERGYFUELS it DRC-2013-003350 Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. 6425 South Highway 191, PO Box 809 Blanding, UT. US, 84511 435 678 2221, fax 435 678 2224 www.energyfuels.com VIA Electronic Mail (PDF) and UPS October 30, 2013 Mr. Rusty Lundberg ^ Division Director of Radiation Control State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality 195 North 1950 West PO Box 144830 Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820 Dear Mr. Lundberg, Re: 11 e.(2) Byproduct Receipt Notification Pursuant to Radioactive Materials License (RML) UT 1900479 condition 10.5.F, Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. is hereby notifying the Division of Radiation Control that the White Mesa Uranium Mill will be receiving and disposing of thirteen loads of 1 le.(2) byproduct materials by November 22, 2013. If there are any questions regarding these shipments or the scheduling of the disposal activities feel free to contact me at the White Mesa Mill at 435.678.2221. Regards, David Turk Environmental Health & Safety Manager Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. cc: Denver Central Files No.: PBL-10 Rev. No.: R-3.1 Date: June 4,2012 DENISON MINES (USA) CORP. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal Page 10 of 12 ATTACHMENT 2 lle.(2) BYPRODUCT MATERIAL DISPOSAL DOCUMENTATION FORM Date: li/n/f? Name of employee receiving the load: ~r>*.rt*y sl&Ad. Generator of the Byproduct Material: t>ft.X. k-i.Ay o > He. Was the State of Utah given notice to the receipt/disposal activities associated with this load?QYes)or No Who gave and when was the notification given? b^A. -r^rfc. , io I soli? Description of byproduct material disposal area/activities: Has each drum been inspected to identify the presence of any void spaces? - Have all drums with void spaces been filled with tailings sands or soil? //A~ . Which tailings cell was the material placed in? /lg.U 73 Was the material placed on a tailings beach area of the cell or on an area of the cell that was underlain by tailings sands? Was the material segregated from any Mill material or equipment disposed of in the cell? y^s Was the material segregated from byproduct material from other ISL sources disposed of in the cell? No.: PBL-10 Rev. No.:R-3.1 Date: June 4, 2012 DENIS ON MINES (USA) CORP. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal Page 11 of 12 Have the thickness and placement measurements been verified and documented for the disposal area by the engineer, specifically: Was the material placed in a cell approved by the executive Secretary for ISL waste disposal?. Documentation of approval L?cr*«s* 4 UT1100*71 A**™/ Was the ISL material segregated from disposed Mill material and other ISL material? fas Refer to plat(s) used to confirm. C*ft 3 fU.l 0Are* Was the maximum lift thickness above tailings less than 4 feet thick? Was the maximum lift thickness of subsequent lifts less than 2 feet thick? Has 4 foot of tailings sands been maintained under each disposal area? /es Refer to drawings used to confirm C*tt 3 tC*i*l. Oru^y^r Is the bottom of each disposal area at least 12 feet from the sides or dikes of the tailings cell? Yes Refer to drawings used to confirm. Ce ft .? Qr«~t\ps Will the elevation of the material exceed the plane or grade of the elevation of the uppermost flexible membrane liner of the cell? How was this confirmed (e.g;, survey or review) Engineer's or RSO's Initials How was the area compacted? Was each lift compacted by heavy equipment (such as a Cat D-6) at least 4 times prior to placement of subsequent lifts? Area. \^c^> Cry^p^c^L i^iR^ /\ aW^r M AA^X ' far W£i%. Were void spaces filled with tailings? Was the shipment properly covered? Are additional settlement monitors required to be placed for this generator? ASA ) If required, where were settlement markers were placed? No.: PBL-10 Rev. No.: R-3.1 Date: June 4, 2012 DENISON MINES (USA) CORP. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal Page 12 of 12 A/A Radiological receipt survey measurements: Breathing Zone: 1. Was a Breathing Zone Sample collected? Yes o^o) 2. If yes, what were the results of the sampling? Was a photograph taken during the unloading activities^Yes)or No URI Shipment No. 13KVD-061 Trailer* GFLU2142 Date>< n~t^ZOiS Seal # n/a NAME OF CARRIER: Greenfield Logistics DRIVER: X SHIPPER (from) URI, Inc. STREET 641 E FM 1118 v CITY Kingsville STATE Texas ZIP 78363 COUNTRY USA PHONE 361-595-5731 COSIGNEE (to) Energy Fuels- White Mesa Mill DESTINATION STREET 6425 S. Hwy 191 CITY Blanding STATE UT ZIP 84511 COUNTRY U.S.A. PHONE 435-678-2221 CONTENTS EXCLUSIVE USE SHIPMENT ***These contents are contaminated with natural uranium and its daughters 226Ra and 230Th PROPER SHIPPING NAME: RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL L S.A 1. HAZARD CLASS" 7 ; IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: UN 2912 WEIGHT: Tare 44.000 lbs. NET 31.008 lbs. GROSS 75.008 lbs. EMERGENCY CONTACTS 24 HOUR CHEMTREC: 800-424-9300 password: URI URI DISTRICT: 361-331-5585 (Joshua Holland) URI HEADQUARTERS: 214-683-8889 (Mark Pelizza) SHIPPER'S CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the above materials are properly classified, described, packaged, marked, placarded and labeled, and are' in proper condition for transportation according to the applicable regulations of the Department of Transportation. THIS VEHICLE IS CONSIPERED A PACKAGE IN COMPLIANCE WITH 49 CFR 173.427 (c) Shipper's Signature K Date CARRIER'S CERTIFICATION Carrier acknowledges receipt of packages and required placards. Carner certifies emergency response information was made available and has the appropriate emergency response document in the vehicle. Department of Transportation Driver's Signature Date Cosignee's Signature ~TtfN^ ONSIGNEE's RECSEPT of SHIPMENT Date J! i , I * . i Ii • .<i I ' 1 | Hi ! ! < •' , f i fill iv •/ f I * I". I • • ... Hi " ' 1 i ) I I . ' I I' '.I" I' 1 ' M • iJ- ' . t . ' . 1 •< i •- • I' i Ii*,1 .,.»,,.-,, f ( .. 1,1 i . . i ' ! ( ! »!-' I ! Ui. ! I|V ! •(' i [ |i,- ,M !.| J j hi.iHi [>... i v,! i ' f i' • '( i ! i i .•' r, • i -'in I ;» I i i.'i \ /, <{U l / >'!.•', » | it/.. ' • i V i t>", Hot.:; If ,i s i | , '>:'''.<• JI i i I, '-'j/u ! : f. 'j - <f , \<<'W ,,-<j ' I 1 <, ! I' 1 !. Ul. /I / ! ''It \ | /I'l''} - '"/( 1 ! I ' 1 I' } '',>!>» I I- •! liit;:: 1.1 i . w. <f't V-'.f'i I }•• »" I, II •; Generator of Byproduct material: URI Kingsville \ Controled Elevation used (Cell 3) Area 5613.04 Elevation Transit Shot 6 11.38 19.6 Initial shot for trench Top of trench 5607.66 Bottom of trench 5599.44 Initial shot used for material Top of material in trench 5603.02 Top of cell 3 Liner 5608.5 Feet below liner 5.48 6 16.02 No.: PBL-10 Rev. No.: R-3.1 Date: June 4,2012 DENISON MINES (USA) CORP. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal Page 10 of 12 ATTACHMENT 2 lle.(2) BYPRODUCT MATERIAL DISPOSAL DOCUMENTATION FORM Date: ll/t / i3 Name of employee receiving the load: T&r>y Zl^ubt- Generator of the Byproduct Material: v?~T- ic^^'lte. Was the State of Utah given notice to the receipt/disposal activities associated with this loadr^Yes^i No Who gave and when was the notification given? Description of byproduct material disposal area/activities: Has each drum been inspected to identify the presence of any void spaces? M-A - Have all drums with void spaces been filled with tailings sands or soil? . Which tailings cell was the material placed in? CeJ\K 3 Was the material placed on a tailings beach area of the cell or on an area of the cell that was underlain by tailings sands? Was the material segregated from any Mill material or equipment disposed of in the cell? Was the material segregated from byproduct material from other ISL sources disposed of in the cell? No.: PBL-10 Rev. No.: R-3.1 Date: June 4,2012 DENISON MINES (USA) CORP. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal Page 11 of 12 ) Have the thickness and placement measurements been verified and documented for the disposal area by the engineer, specifically: Was the material placed in a cell approved by the executive Secretary for ISL waste disposal? Ky Documentation of approval l~f'cc»$c ft UTflco<f79 A*** Was the ISL material segregated from disposed Mill material and other ISL material? fee Refer to plat(s) used to confirm. J t/cz fop***/ Ar*<i> Was the maximum lift thickness above tailings less than 4 feet thick? Was the maximum lift thickness of subsequent lifts less than 2 feet thick? Has 4 foot of tailings sands been maintained under each disposal area? frW Refer to drawings used to confirm 6c,/fi3 /)/**^<yy< Is the bottom of each disposal area at least 12 feet from the sides or dikes of the tailings cell? 1^/ Refer to drawings used to confirm. Cef/3 tCen?}. Will the elevation of the material exceed the plane or grade of the elevation of the uppermost flexible membrane liner of the cell? or review) How was this confirmed (e.g., survey Engineer's or RSO's Initials How was the area compacted? Was each lift compacted by heavy equipment (such as a Cat D-6) at least 4, times prior to placement of subsequent lifts? Were void spaces filled with tailings? Was the shipment properly covered? l±s. Are additional settlement monitors required to be placed for this generator? A/A If required, where were settlement markers were placed? No.: PBL-10 Rev. No.:R-3.1 Date: June 4,2012 DENISON MINES (USA) CORP. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal Page 12 of 12 A/A Radiological receipt survey measurements: Breathing Zone: 1. Was a Breathing Zone Sample collected? Yes or^Ncj) 2. If yes, what were the results of the sampling? Was a photograph taken during the unloading activities?/Yes))r No / URI URI, INC. STRAIGHT BILL OF LADING FOR BYPRODUCT MATERIAL RM License No. R03653 Shipment No. 13KVD-068 Trailer* 279761 Date^ \l)mit*> Sea # NAME OF CARRIER: Environmental Evolutions DRIVER: X" SHIPPER (from) URI, Inc. STREET 641 E. FM 1118 CITY Kingsville STATE Texas ZIP 78363 COUNTRY USA PHONE 361-595-5731 COSIGNEE (to) Energy Fuels- White Mesa Mill DESTINATION STREET 6425 S. Hwy 191 CITY Blanding STATE UT ZIP 84511 COUNTRY U.S.A. PHONE 435-678-2221 CONTENTS EXCLUSIVE USE SHIPMENT These contents are contaminated with natural uranium and its daughters 226Ra and 230Th PROPER SHIPPING NAME: RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL LS.A 1. HAZARD CLASS" 7 IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: UN 2912 WEIGHT: Tare 45.000 lbs. NET 29.565 lbs. GROSS 74.565 lbs. EMERGENCY CONTACTS 24 HOUR CHEMTREC: 800-424-9300 password: URI URI DISTRICT: 361-331-5585 (Joshua Holland) URI HEADQUARTERS: 214-683-8889 (Mark Pelizza) SHIPPER'S CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the above materials are properly classified, described, packaged, marked, placarded and labeled, and are in proper condition for transportation according to the applicable regulations of the Department of Transportation. THIS VEHICLE IS CONSIDERED A PACKAGE IN COMPLIANCE WITH 49 CFR 173.427 (c) Shipper's Signature Date CARRIER'S CERTIFICATION Carrier acknowledges receipt of packages and required placards. Carrier certifies emergency response information was made available and has the appropriate emergency response document in the vehicle Department of Transportation Driver's Signature Date K\o/WB IGNEE's RECIEPT of SHIPMENT Cosignee"sSjgnature I Date Generator of Byproduct material: URI Kingsville Controled Elevation used (Cell 3) 5613.04 Area Elevation Transit Shot Initial shot for trench Top of trench Bottom of trench Initial shot used for material Top of material in trench Top of cell 3 Liner Feet below liner 5607.66 5599.44 5603.02 6 11.38 19.6 6 16.02 5608.5 5.48 ( i (> •> i I) i 1 > ' i , i •'> 'Hi I > It;;; I t f • - U»,: >t . i . • ! j if > i> ' 1' i I ! •. J r •; Ml.'! K'j> UK I !• H It.^.U i |. t I MI'U'N ffil in P H , ! in i j. I ! '( ! I >f I j , f'f'/ 3 * ' t '. He l i. (,,»'.(\( 'i-i .."••fir.n-s i 1111 • i 11 i •> •: • w' •; il--i i-'^.M i ! /('i I 'i'{f ! ? i'K.;; /' , N^l t hij s 1' MY\A\! -I h • :','<>.".p )l- *,J ! i i'i If 'i f.) \ No.: PBL-10 Rev. No.:R-3.1 Date: June 4,2012 DENISON MINES (USA) CORP. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal Page 10 of 12 ATTACHMENT 2 lle.(2) BYPRODUCT MATERIAL DISPOSAL DOCUMENTATION FORM Date: tl/^/^ Name of employee receiving the load: T^rf-y ci^cLe Generator of the Byproduct Material: OR.IL |<.r^.*i>rUf Was the State of Utah given notice to the receipt/disposal activities associated with this load? (jfes)or No Who gave and when was the notification given? b^r<l T^-fcLt io I sol 13 Description of byproduct material disposal area/activities: Has each drum been inspected to identify the presence of any void spaces? A/>A - Have all drums with void spaces been filled with tailings sands or soil? A/A Which tailings cell was the material placed in? _ Was the material placed on a tailings beach area of the cell or on an area of the cell that was underlain by tailings sands? Was the material segregated from any Mill material or equipment disposed of in the cell? Was the material segregated from byproduct material from other ISL sources disposed of in the cell? Y*s - No.: PBL-10 Rev. No.: R-3.1 Date: June 4,2012 DENISON MINES (USA) CORP. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal Page 11 of 12 Have the thickness and placement measurements been verified and documented for the disposal area by the engineer, specifically: Was the material placed in a cell approved by the executive Secretary for ISL waste disposal? yV< Documentation of approval d (4Tti00S79 At**f Was the ISL material segregated from disposed Mill material and other ISL material? fa Refer to plat(s) used to confirm. CtM 3 tUZ Popes*/ Arc* Was the maximum lift thickness above tailings less than 4 feet thick? Was the maximum lift thickness of subsequent, lifts less than 2 feet thick? Has 4 foot of tailings sands been maintained under each disposal area? Ye i Refer to drawings used to confirm Cefl 3 Confk D/*<-~»\y.t Is the bottom of each disposal area at least 12 feet from the sides or dikes of the tailings cell? jei Refer to drawings used to confirm. €*ff 3 COMK Qr*<-?/*4* Will the elevation of the material exceed the plane or grade of the elevation of the uppermost flexible membrane liner of the cell? this How was confirmed (e.g., survey or review) Engineer's or RSO's Initials How was the area compacted? Was each lift compacted by heavy equipment (such as a Cat D-6) at least 4 times prior to placement of subsequent lifts? Were void spaces filled with tailings? Was the shipment properly covered? tz£ Are additional settlement monitors required to be placed for this generator? ) < ! If required, where were settlement markers were placed? No.: PBL-10 Rev. No.: R-3.1 Date: June 4, 2012 DENISON MINES (USA) CORP. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Title: 11 e.(2) Byproduct Disposal Radiological receipt survey measurements: Page 12 of 12 Breathing Zone: 1. Was a Breathing Zone Sample collected? Yes o^cN> 2. If yes, what were the results of the sampling? Was a photograph taken during the unloading activities ?/Yes)Dr No URI URI, INC. BYPRODUCT MATERIAL License No. R036S3 Shipment No. 13KVD-071 Trailer #279284 Date:X j\p_ hti L$ Seal # n/a NAME OF CARRIER: Environmental Evolutions DRIVER: «0 f v v , 6 SHIPPER (from) URI, Inc. STREET 641 E. FM 1118 CITY Kingsville STATE Texas ZIP 78363 COUNTRY USA PHONE 361-595-5731 COSIGNEE (to) Energy Fuels- White Mesa Mill DESTINATION STREET 6425 S. Hwy 191 CITY Blanding STATE UT ZIP 84511 COUNTRY U.S.A. PHONE 435-678-2221 CONTENTS EXCLUSIVE USE SHIPMENT *These contents are contaminated with natural uranium and its daughters 226Ra and 230Th *** PROPER SHIPPING NAME: RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL L.S.A 1 HAZARD CLASS: _7 IDENTIFICATION NUMBER- UN 2912 WEIGHT: Tare 45.000 lbs. NET 30.429 lbs. GROSS 75.429 lbs. EMERGENCY CONTACTS 24 HOUR CHEMTREC:' 800-424-9300 password: URI URI DISTRICT: 361-331-5585 (Joshua Holland) URI HEADQUARTERS: 214-683-8889 (Mark Pelizza) SHIPPER'S CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the above materials are properly classified, described, packaged, marked, placarded and labeled, and are in proper condition for transportation according to the applicable regulations of the Department of Transportation THIS VEHICLE IS CONSIDERED A PACKAGE IN COMPLIANCE WITH 49 CFR 173.427 (c) Shipper's Signature Date // CARRIER'S CE Carrier acknowledges receipt jdf packages and required placards. Carrier certifies emergency response information was made available and has the appropriate emergency response document in the vehicle. Department of Transportation / Driver's Signature V / Date CONSIGNEE'S RECIEPT of SHIPMENT Cosignee's Signature Date Generator of Byproduct material: URI Kingsville Controled Elevation used (Cell 3) 5613.04 Area Elevation Transit Shot Initial shot for trench Top of trench Bottom of trench Initial shot used for material Top of material in trench Top of cell 3 Liner Feet below liner 5607.66 5599.44 5603.02 6 11.38 19.6 6 16.02 5608.5 5.48 • "' '., f i t • <l •: {I MIH! i <•! 1 I'l f. Vv I 1 1 •1' t >". > I'.' i'l; »"!(•,. ' %' t I . ! v • I> !! ! i l ! i , i i1 I' I . .1 1 I . • If'' i i' .' i' • r !•'••: •t»f < > •> r M; * •I - 1 f., , I ' I' • i II . ' >>;: i II I i i'l ii --*\'! I! i ' MHCK !,r.> .M ''; i^ '.-'i'l i C'l.'t 'i' >i i l> i I •• j ! /! I ''• • , 'ft I ', hf'' .! V .'•V'-'-tt !; ,' / .J:fii i 1 !, • i1 t i : I ' '» /'.J,.-'.'!.- 'j i . ,• , ! • ( • 5 II i i t i n i ' /' ri~ ~ 7' / • t H )'•, ! f »••;,' i!^ll j/'; j *• f-iA "/j;',"'! I I l« 'I'P ; 'i '!,!/{ .•'•( i I ;; l.f i •; V'', '",' I ,".,.^'1 1 i. . * /ftUfl I |.i I If. I f"i •.!!•: ' i'l i'"! ui" ( No.: PBL-10 Rev. No.: R-3.1 Date: June 4,2012 DENISON MINES (USA) CORP. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal Page 10 of 12 ATTACHMENT 2 lle.(2) BYPRODUCT MATERIAL DISPOSAL DOCUMENTATION FORM Date: u/t Name of employee receiving the load: frty-r^^- f^lywas- Generator of the Byproduct Material: L> fcX^ iC*^i>»lt<g. Was the State of Utah given notice to the receipt/disposal activities associated with this loadt^Yesjor No Who gave and when was the notification given? Description of byproduct material disposal area/activities: bt> f Has each drum been inspected to identify the presence of any void spaces? _ A/A Have all drums with void spaces been filled with tailings sands or soil? _ A/A Which tailings cell was the material placed in? [ Was the material placed on a tailings beach area of the cell or on an area of the cell that was underlain by tailings sands? Was the material segregated from any Mill material or equipment disposed of in the cell? Was the material segregated from byproduct material from other ISL sources disposed of in the cell? o No.: PBL-10 Rev. No.: R-3.1 Date: June 4, 2012 DENIS ON MINES (USA) CORP. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal Page 11 of 12 Have the thickness and placement measurements been verified and documented for the disposal area by the engineer, specifically: Was the material placed in a cell approved by the executive Secretary for ISL waste disposal? fte Documentation of approval Lrtt«& #-(4T/qOQ V79 Awf Was the ISL material segregated from disposed Mill material and other ISL material? ¥*c • Refer to plat(s) used to confirm. dttt 3 ffe.Z 0/^^/ Arc^t Was the maximum lift thickness above tailings less than 4 feet thick? Was the maximum lift thickness of subsequent lifts less than 2 feet thick? Has 4 foot of tailings sands been maintained under each disposal area? fa Refer to drawings used to confirm Ce/f 3 do*tfk Os* ^> Is the bottom of each disposal area at least 12 feet from the sides or dikes of the tailings cell? Refer to drawings used to confirm. 3 Will the elevation of the material exceed the plane or grade of the elevation of the uppermost flexible membrane lirier of the cell? A/a How was this confirmed (e.g., survey or ~ review) Engineer's or RSO's Initials How was the area compacted? Was each lift compacted by heavy equipment (such as a Cat D-6) at least 4 times prior to placement of subsequent lifts? Jift Were void spaces filled with tailings? fcs Was the shipment properly covered? i±± Are additional settlement monitors required to be placed for this generator? MA If required, where were settlement markers were placed? No.: PBL-10 Rev. No.:R-3.1 Date: June 4, 2012 DENIS ON MINES (USA) CORP. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal /v/A Radiological receipt survey measurements: Breathing Zone: 1. Was a Breathing Zone Sample collected? Yes or^Nj) 2. If yes, what were the results of the sampling? Page 12 of 12 Was a photograph taken during the unloading activities? ^e^br No URi URI, INC. STRAIGHT BILL OF LADING FOR BYPRODUCT MATERIAL RM License No. R03653 Shipment No. 13KVD-072 Trailer #274389 Date: I* Seal # n/a NAME OF CARRIER: Environmental Evolutions DRIVER: \/ L<Ji rO^r^jQ SHIPPER (from) URI, Inc. STREET 641 E. FM 1118 CITY Kingsville STATE Texas ZIP 78363 COUNTRY USA PHONE 361-595-5731 COSIGNEE (to) Energy Fuels- White Mesa Mill DESTINATION STREET 6425 S. Hwy 191 CITY Blanding STATE UT ZIP 84511 COUNTRY U.S.A. PHONE 435-678-2221 CONTENTS EXCLUSIVE USE SHIPMENT These contents are contaminated with natural uranium and its daughters 226Ra and 230Th *** PROPER SHIPPING NAME: RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL L.S.A 1. HAZARD CLASS: _7 IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: UN 2912 WEIGHT: Tare 45.000 lbs. NET 32.547 lbs. GROSS 77.547 lbs. EMERGENCY CONTACTS 24 HOUR CHEMTREC: 800-424-9300 password: URI URI DISTRICT: 361-331-5585 (Joshua Holland) URI HEADQUARTERS: 214-683-8889 (Mark Pelizza) SHIPPER'S CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the above materials are properly classified, described, packaged, marked, placarded and labeled, and are in proper condition for transportation according to the applicable regulations of the Department of Transportation. THIS VEHICLE IS CONSIDERED A,PACKAGE IN COMPLIANCE WITH 49 CFR 173.427 (c) Shipper's Signature x: Date :^JkJ£dl iRRIER's CERTIFICATION Carrier acknowledges receipt of packages and required placards. Carrier certifies emergency response information was made available and has the appropriate emergency response document in the vehicle. Department of Transportation. , Driver's Signature Date CONSIGNEE'S RECIEPT of SHIPMENT Cosignee's Signature fA Date it Jif/<3 Generator of Byproduct material: URI Kingsville Controled Elevation used (Cell 3) Area Elevation 5613.04 Transit Shot Initial shot for trench Top of trench Bottom of trench Initial shot used for material Top of material in trench 5607.66 5599.44 5603.02 6 11.38 19.6 6 16.02 Top of cell 3 Liner 5608.5 Feet below liner 5.48 i ii « r'| In 'i •>: • v i i > , ' I i' ,f) i ! i •: p.. 1' : l U l'|f • i I'l i i I V./ ' •. ' M Ul-.'" '•' I " III' ',!!•'). i !',' '',.''•1 '1 •!, I . I'll) 1 i II'!' 1 • , • < i if;; ••rt I'IMOIMII - I * ^ * • ? 'i in* • j ,,» I i /S ,'\/;>f i | "> l-tf.; ' *i Hif;; i '! ' ''f'i i '. ' I ,' " H 1 11 rt : \ >: t' ,", 5l.-"il i lit 1 I'S > , , p. ! !. • i r h u .t !! I I | . ' <• ,'\ i( i I i • min-i « I*. J / II.'1 l-^.ll Li ' 11> V.'i ''is- f'i« •'J(' 'i I •/•/MM | I., ,.i I'IHI-: No.: PBL-10 Rev. No.:R-3.1 Date: June 4,2012 DENISON MINES (USA) CORP. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal Page 10 of 12 ATTACHMENT 2 lle.(2) BYPRODUCT MATERIAL DISPOSAL DOCUMENTATION FORM Date: uftg/l^ Name of employee receiving the load: 9cA^t~r Generator of the Byproduct Material: tJ^.r jc;^xoMU_ Was the State of Utah given notice to the receipt/disposal activities associated with this load?(^es)pr No Who gave and when was the notification given? Description of byproduct material disposal area/activities: Se.<> f U*>r~o pU.Pfc Has each drum been inspected to identify the presence of any void spaces? A/A - Have all drums with void spaces been filled with tailings sands or soil? /l/4~ . Which tailings cell was the material placed in? £JL U f? Was the material placed on a tailings beach area of the cell or on an area of the cell that was underlain by tailings sands? Was the material segregated from any Mill material or equipment disposed of in the cell? . Was the material segregated from byproduct material from other ISL sources disposed of in the cell? Xzl \ No.: PBL-10 Rev. No.: R-3.1 Date: June 4,2012 DENISON MINES (USA) CORP. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal Page 11 of 12 3 Have the thickness and placement measurements been verified and documented for the disposal area by the engineer, specifically: Engineer's or RSO's Initials Was the material placed in a cell approved by the executive Secretary for ISL waste disposal? Documentation of approval lfot«se. #ufff0QY7<f /{so^f Was the ISL material segregated from disposed Mill material and other ISL material? Refer to plat(s) used to confirm. &/f 3 lle.Z* O&pc&i/ Arc*, Was the maximum lift thickness above tailings less than 4 feet thick? Was the maximum lift thickness of subsequent lifts less than 2 feet thick? Has 4 foot of tailings sands been maintained under each disposal area? fe" Refer to drawings used to confirm 6e/l 3 /^A<h Dr&*~fags' Is the bottom of each disposal area at least 12 feet from the sides or dikes of the tailings cell? Refer to drawings used to confirm, f.e/f 3 fjotsh /)wf/Uts ML Will the elevation of the material exceed the plane or grade of the elevation of the uppermost flexible membrane liner of the cell? A/tv How was this confirmed (e.g., survey or review) How was the area compacted? Was each lift compacted by heavy equipment (such as a Cat D-6) at least 4 times prior to placement of subsequent lifts? Were void spaces filled with tailings? — Was the shipment properly covered? tcS Are additional settlement monitors required to be placed for this generator? AS'h If required, where were settlement markers were placed? No.: PBL-10 Rev.No.:R-3.1 Date: June 4,2012 DENISON MINES (USA) CORP. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Title: 11 e.(2) Byproduct Disposal Page 12 of 12 Radiological receipt survey measurements: Breathing Zone: 1. Was a Breathing Zone Sample collected? Yes 2. If yes, what were the results of the sampling? 0^) Was a photograph taken during the unloading activities^Yesjpr No s/Ye"sbr r URI URI, INC. STRAIGHT BILL OF LADING FOR BYPRODUCT MATERIAL RM License No. R03653 Shipment No. 13KVD-073 x it/i<//* Trailer #274280 Date: Seal # n/a (§GtM' jLU NAME OF CARRIER: Environmental Evolutions DRIVER: SHIPPER (from) URI, Inc. STREET 641 E. FM1118 CITY Kingsville STATE Texas ZIP 78363 COUNTRY USA PHONE 361-595-5731 cosiGNEE(to) Energy Fuels- White Mesa Mill DESTINATION STREET 6425 S. Hwy 191 CITY Bland ing STATE UT ZIP 84511 COUNTRY U.S.A. PHONE 435-678-2221 CONTENTS EXCLUSIVE USE SHIPMENT These contents are contaminated with natural uranium and its daughters 226Ra and 230Th PROPER SHIPPING NAME: RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL LS.A 1. HAZARD CLASS: J IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: UN 2912 WEIGHT: Tare 45.000 lbs. NET 28.632 lbs. GROSS _73j332Jbs. EMERGENCY CONTACTS 24 HOUR CHEMTREC: 800-424-9300 password: URI URI DISTRICT: 361-331-5585 (Joshua Holland) URI HEADQUARTERS: 214-683-8889 (Mark Pelizza) SHIPPER'S CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the above materials are properly classified, described, packaged, marked, placarded and labeled, and are in proper condition for transportation according to the applicable regulations of the Department of Transportation. THIS VEHICLE IS CONSIDERED A PACKAGE IN COMPLIANCE WITH 49 CFR 173.427 (c) Shipper's Signature Date ARRIER's CERTIFICATION Carrier acknowledges receipt of packages and required placards. Carrier certifies emergency response information was made available and has the appropriate emergency response document in the vehicle. Department of Transportation. Driver's Signature Date . x ;/A//3 RECIEPT of SHIPMENT Cosignee's Signature Date Generator of Byproduct material: URI Kingsville Controled Elevation used (Cell 3) Area Elevation 5613.04 Transit Shot Initial shot for trench Top of trench Bottom of trench Initial shot used for material Top of material in trench 6607^66 5599.44 5603.02 6 11.38 19.6 6 , 16.02 Top of cell 3 Liner 5608.5 Feet below liner 5.48 \ V n, . i / . 1-1 r - » l-l.i I. \ > V\'*"> '• . I h i;i ffj ./ Il : I m>I i .HI • t i }\ V.I I I ^ ,t | "i in ! >. ft '' ' i ( 1 I I IM' >„ '•,".,'i,'.| '•hi' f • • f >•:: < M I (• = U •:: • r..ii, i I t. fS| '; KT i l' ii • i f (•:; -l.ii.l ! h l,ri., I n II''"i KVri Cj.'i Kl Ni.'s'Mi l I j'.iiilf: Mi ntlT'lUi' i.' I'l" K' • f i 1 -i. i .ia !, : / I 'i rl < Mi'.s-: .' !!',-!•; I I ' | ! ;-, 1-1 ,'•: i,, c ( < !• ! "vr ,ii f . i . • : i •.-".!) 1-1' I K '+11}-i'l .< 'ii'li: , . f i I,' ! ' I , 1 f;' • ':.>"•»'* i h" i i j • i ; l-l.. !.(:!. f / / • i • > - • , I ! .", ' 'i !'. I j I'll'. i (if! ;: V i 4(•.</! i I. I < . 1 fi i < i :: No.: PBL-10 Rev. No.: R-3.1 Date: June 4,2012 DENISON MINES (USA) CORP. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal Page 10 of 12 ATTACHMENT 2 lle.(2) BYPRODUCT MATERIAL DISPOSAL DOCUMENTATION FORM Date: w\^d\^ Name of employee receiving the load: i^r&jrA^ ftoJ^^e/^ Generator of the Byproduct Material: cJiZT jcf^-g^Ml/* Was the State of Utah given notice to the receipt/disposal activities associated with this load?(YesSr No Who gave and when was the notification given? Description of byproduct material disposal area/activities: — p Uffto A.-^A p U ,f \r Has each drum been inspected to identify the presence of any void spaces? Ay A - Have all drums with void spaces been filled with tailings sands or soil? A/Ar . Which tailings cell was the material placed in? L*A\ Was the material placed on a tailings beach area of the cell or on an area of the cell that was underlain by tailings sands? Was the material segregated from any Mill material or equipment disposed of in the cell? %s Was the material segregated from byproduct material from other ISL sources disposed of in the cell? £L£ No.: PBL-10 Rev.No.:R-3.1 Date: June 4,2012 DENISON MINES (USA) CORP. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal Page 11 of 12 Have the thickness and placement measurements been verified and documented for the disposal area by the engineer, specifically: Was the material placed in a cell approved by the executive Secretary for ISL waste disposal? Documentation of approval ^CIM& ft UTWOfTf Ar»*t Was the ISL material segregated from disposed Mill material and other ISL material? ffc* Refer to plat(s) used to confirm Ct,(1 3 tU.Z- Otefas*/ A* Was the maximum lift thickness above tailings less than 4 feet thick? Was the maximum lift thickness of subsequent lifts less than 2 feet thick? Has 4 foot of tailings sands been maintained under each disposal area? Ye* Refer to drawings used to confirm rCvM 3 /)/xt*~/l*fr Is the bottom of each disposal area at least 12 feet from the sides or dikes of the tailings cell? &g Refer to drawings used to confirm. Cefl 3 Ces&fc /)ra Will the elevation of the material exceed the plane or grade of the elevation of the uppermost flexible membrane liner of the cell? How was this confirmed (e.g., survey or review) Engineer's or RSO's Initials How was the area compacted? Was each lift compacted by heavy equipment (such as a Cat D-6) at least 4 times prior to placement of subsequent lifts? Were void spaces filled with tailings? Was the shipment properly cohered? YAI Are additional settlement monitors required to be placed for this generator? AS A- ) If required, where were settlement markers were placed? No.: PBL-10 Rev. No.: R-3.1 Date: June 4,2012 DENISON MINES (USA) CORP. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal Page 12 of 12 A/A Radiological receipt survey measurements: Breathing Zone: 1. Was a Breathing Zone Sample collected? Yes of^o^) 2. If yes, what were the results of the sampling? Was a photograph taken during the unloading activities^Yesjpr No URI URI, INC. STRAIGHT BILL OF LADING FOR BYPRODUCT MATERIAL RM License No. R03653 Shipment No 13KVD-Q74 Trailer* 279761 Seal # n/a NAME OF CARRIER: Environmental Evolutions DRIVER SHIPPER (from) URI, Inc. STREET 641 E. FM 1118 CITY Kingsville STATE Texas ZIP 78363 COUNTRY USA PHONE 364-595-5731 COSIGNEE (to) Energy Fuels- White Mesa Mill DESTINATION STREET 6425 S. Hwy 191 CITY Blanding STATE UT ZIP 84511 COUNTRY U.S.A. PHONE 435-678-2221 CONTENTS EXCLUSIVE USE SHIPMENT ***These contents are contaminated with natural uranium and its daughters 226Ra and 230Th PROPER SHIPPING NAME: RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL L.S.A 1. HAZARD CLASS: _7 IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: UN 2912 WEIGHT: Tare 45.000 lbs. NET 32.463 lbs. GROSS 77.463 lbs. EMERGENCY CONTACTS 24 HOUR CHEMTREC: 800-424-9300 password: URI URI DISTRICT: 361-331-5585 (Joshua Holland) URI HEADQUARTERS: 214-683-8889 (Mark Pelizza) SHIPPER'S CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the above materials are properly classified, described, packaged, marked, placarded and labeled, and are in proper condition for transportation according to the applicable regulations of the Department of Transportation. THIS VEHICLE IS CONSIDERED A PACKAGE IN COMPLIANCE WITH 49 CFR 173.427 (c) Shipper's Signature Date CARRIER'S CERTIFICATION Carrier acknowledges receipt&f packages and required placards. Carrier certifies emergency response information was made available and has the appropriate emergency response document in the vehicle. Department of Transportation. 2C Driver's Signature Date ONSIGNEE's RECIEPT of SHIPMENT Cosignee's Signature Date ) 'if'-l IP ' ">'l l;,>:'- '' '1 I I'' i'' ''lJ'';fo l,ui p. '\ i! i nhi.i-.v l' • 1 1 I' «U M'' U"i. i io.. '"ii i - I ' !•» ! . i l.f • !(•«:: i. o< 1.11. t r i' "j Ii.iVr • i i I' 1 •I" l;r • r o<.' !.'";: •• .i i) i < I II :; Hu I- a I![-' I • •i'Ui. URI K. 11 Hi'.'HI i.t 0OIMI f ' ino ('it. 11 •' I.V >'/(.\ ( l i- r iK' I../ I-', i i|!; i- / .! l! ! \ ij.' ! - Kl'i, it' . . .' i' 1 ! /,:•, •/pn \ \ il/;- '-.f\ ,'] '/i&N I I > i\'\> I I ' .',':/r'(i i n.'!.:: ! 1« '*.W;u f h I, '"h 11 s t't ! n! i hi).! Generator of Byproduct material: URI Kingsville Controled Elevation used (Cell 3) 5613.04 Area Elevation Transit Shot Initial shot for trench Top of trench Bottom of trench Initial shot used for material Top of material in trench Top of cell 3 Liner Feet below liner 5607.66 5599.44 5603.02 6 11.38 19.6 6 16.02 5608.5 5.48 No.: PBL-10 Rev. No.: R-3.1 Date: June 4,2012 DENISON MINES (USA) CORP. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal Page 10 of 12 ATTACHMENT 2 lle.(2) BYPRODUCT MATERIAL DISPOSAL DOCUMENTATION FORM Date: tili^lii Name of employee receiving the load: TV.r*>vy c\ p „ Generator of the Byproduct Material: ngv i}rtkio>i Was the State of Utah given notice to the receipt/disposal activities associated with this load^/Yes^br No Who gave and when was the notification given? TV* tJlX T„ r- in. x to J sol 13 Description of byproduct material disposal area/activities: forty Ayf Has each drum been inspected to identify the presence of any void spaces? MA - Have all drums with void spaces been filled with tailings sands or soil? A/A . Which tailings cell was the material placed in? £eJl 3 Was the material placed on a tailings beach area of the cell or on an area of the cell that was underlain by tailings sands? Was the material segregated from any Mill material or equipment disposed of in the cell? y^r : Was the material segregated from byproduct material from other ISL sources disposed of in the cell? No.: PBL-10 Rev. No.:R-3.1 Date: June 4,2012 DENISON MINES (USA) CORP. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal Page 11 of 12 Have the thickness and placement measurements been verified and documented for the disposal area by the engineer, specifically: Was the material placed in a cell approved by the executive Secretary for ISL waste disposal? fry Documentation of approval ft uT/Wffm Aimf Was the ISL material segregated from disposed Mill material and other ISL material? K?y Refer to plat(s) used to confirm. Celt 3 O^esof Arc*, Was the maximum lift thickness above tailings less than 4 feet thick? Was the maximum lift thickness of subsequent lifts less than 2 feet thick? Has 4 foot of tailings sands been maintained under each disposal area? jcj Refer to drawings used to confirm Ctft 3 Is the bottom of each disposal area at least 12 feet from the sides or dikes of the tailings cell? ffey Refer to drawings used to confirm. Celt 3 Orm-'fojrz Will the elevation of the material exceed the plane or grade of the elevation of the uppermost flexible membrane liner of the cell? Jr. How was this confirmed (e.g., . survey or review) Engineer's or RSO's Initials How was the area compacted? Was each lift compacted by heavy equipment (such as a Cat D-6) at least 4 times prior to placement of subsequent lifts? Were void spaces filled with tailings? Was the shipment properly covered? Are additional settlement monitors required to be placed for this generator? 4zA If required, where were settlement markers were placed? No.: PBL-10 Rev. No.: R-3.1 Date: June 4, 2012 DENISON MINES (USA) CORP. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal Page 12 of 12 A/A Radiological receipt survey measurements: Breathing Zone: 1. Was a Breathing Zone Sample collected? Yes o^So^ 2. If yes, what were the results of the sampling? Was a photograph taken during the unloading activities? Yes o/No Shipment Number BILL OF LADING - LICENSED MATERIAL SHIPPING FORM 24-HOUR EMERGENCY CONTACT NUMBER/PROVIDER & CONTRACT NAME OR No. (830) 583-4222 Kevin Dziuk (Radiation Safety Officer) CONSIGNOR (Shipper/From): Company Name and Site CONSIGNEE (Receiver/To): Company Name and Site: South Texas Mining Venture LLP - HOBSON TX Energy Fuels - BLANDING UTAH ADDRESS: 20278 N. FM 81 Hobson, TX 78117 ADDRESS: 6425 S Highway 19 Blanding, UT 84511 SHIPPER TELEPHONE No.: (830)780-3377 CONSIGNEE TELEPHONE No.: (435)678-2221 SHIPPER NRC/STATE LICENSE No: R03626 SHIPPER USDOT No.: 148604 CARRIER NAME: Cosby Trucking, LLC CARRIER USDOT No.: 298957 SHIPPER/TRANSPORTER INFORMATION CONSIGNEE NRC/STATE LICENSE No.: UT 1900479 SHIPP'ER PHMSA REGISTRATION No.: 071111 550 027TV CARRIER ADDRESS: 601 S 200 E Blanding, UT 84511 CARRIER PHMSA REGISTRATION No.: 071113 550 019V NUMBER OF UNITS HM DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL, ARTICLES, SPECIAL MARKS, EXCEPTIONS UN PSN CLASS Gross WEIGHT KG (LBS) UN 2912 TRAILER RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL, LOW SPECIFIC ACTIVITY (LSA-1) (Solid By-Product Material) Estimated 18,143 (40,000) 777 Mbq Activity Curie x 3.7E4 = 1 Megabecquerel Volume 459 cubic feet 0.021 Ci) ****EXCLUSIVE USE SHIPMENT**** CATEGORY OF LABEL(S) APPLIED TO PACKAGE - 2912 EMERGENCY RESPONSE DOCUMENT ATTACHED - 2012 ERG Section 162 This Is to certify that the above-named articles are properly classified, described, packaged, marked, and labeled, and are in proper condition for transportation according to the applicable regulations of the Department of Transportation. SHIPPER'S SIGNATURES?**^ JljL^yudkj^ DRIVER'S SIGNATUR 9- DESTINATION SIGNATURE OF INDICATION OF LEAKAGE NO DATE 11 KJo), Q DATE//V^-/S? DATE 11-15-13 YES, EXPLAIN Hi i I " . i'l, i 1 • '}•:'* ' • 1! i •. i'} | :' M id i MM ' I V «! I (v on .i i « I l ' • I . ' I 0 !' I .' 1 I I ' ' i 'mi 10;: !;.]('( 'f I > J H'!\ f -i i I I i I' 1 • i t i j - I 11; 'l*--.' 'M. I' i • ^ i 111".!:, Ml i.. i'lfli If if ! (•' I *i I ij i il ;Y I. i V r\N ; ! 1 •.'),• j'i,\:, -<• i., j |.-'., 1 , f J I I 1 •> 1 i • > In:; ! I I WM ! 1 irt s i. ii 11 ,i !!/!'.', "i,i I . i'l/'.:: M j 11- •! ,','U\ \ \ . H'l i .',•" .,11 II. : '! . i I Sl-'l j i , ' Mi'in- -1'1 :• i i I U ! '.i 'i-" 1 ' I r.i \ ! ^-^ I h M -it.. !. Lit. ; i,h i i i [11 ' • > i . - •VS.J . \ \ ' \ \ '\\\ '', M/;:; <•<• . «,.".;.f;i i i 11 M'l) "MM • ns/-.' I f /1 > ',:M| > MMS:V'< VM.\' I I. i! iiM1 .r*' :''f.\; MI-I ',' h 0.0 PXO Generator of Byproduct material: UECHobson Controled Elevation used (Cell 3) 5613.04 Area Elevation Transit Shot Initial shot for trench Top of trench Bottom of trench Initial shot used for material Top of material in trench 5607.22 5600.94 5603.74 6 11.82 18.1 6 15.3 Top of cell 3 Liner Feet below liner 5608.5 4.76 ( No.: PBL-10 Rev.No.:R-3.1 Date: June 4,2012 DENISON MINES (USA) CORP. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal Page 10 of 12 ATTACHMENT 2 lle.(2) BYPRODUCT MATERIAL DISPOSAL DOCUMENTATION FORM Date: Name of employee receiving the load: T&rr-^ Generator of the Byproduct Material: L>££ P^l^v^^AA Was the State of Utah given notice to the receipt/disposal activities associated with this load^Yes))r No Who gave and when was the notification given? bc^)A TL>rkLt \t>l?oli-l Description of byproduct material disposal area/activities: Has each drum been inspected to identify the presence of any void spaces? Vej - Have all drums with void spaces been filled with tailings sands or soil? VtJ . Which tailings cell was the material placed in? (>JI 3 Was the material placed on a tailings beach area of the cell or on an area of the cell that was underlain by tailings sands? Was the material segregated from any Mill material or equipment disposed of in the cell? : Was the material segregated from byproduct material from other ISL sources disposed of in the cell? YcA No.: PBL-10 Rev. No.: R-3.1 Date: June 4,2012 DENISON MINES (USA) CORP. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal Page 11 of 12 ) Have the thickness and placement measurements been verified and documented for the disposal area by the engineer, specifically: o Was the material placed in a cell approved by the executive Secretary for ISL waste disposal? Yd Documentation of approval _£?een<c 'tfWtfl At»"><f Was the ISL material segregated from disposed Mill material and other ISL material? Refer to plat(s) used to confirm. C<f? .5 tfe.Z- Otefos*/ Ana. Was the maximum lift thickness above tailings less than 4 feet thick? Was the maximum lift thickness of subsequent lifts less than 2 feet thick? Has 4 foot of tailings sands been maintained under each disposal area? Ves Refer to drawings used to confirm Cett 3 Ctajk /)r+vf/>Q>s Is the bottom of each disposal area at least 12, feet from the sides or dikes of the tailings cell? Ye* Refer to drawings used to confirm, /f*// 3 tCe/vh *On*^t*q3 Will the elevation of the material exceed the plane or grade of the elevation of the uppermost flexible membrane liner of the cell? How was this confirmed (e.g., survey or review) Engineer's or RSO's Initials How was the area compacted? Was each lift compacted by heavy equipment (such as a Cat D-6) at least 4 times prior to placement of subsequent lifts? Were void spaces filled with tailings? *LL Was the shipment properly covered? ~US Are additional settlement monitors required to be placed for this generator? /i/A- : :) :— If required, where were settlement markers were placed? No.: PBL-10 Rev.No.:R-3.1 Date: June 4,2012 DENISON MINES (USA) CORP. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Title: lle.(2) Byproduct Disposal VA Page 12 of 12 Radiological receipt survey measurements: PXD-Q Breathing Zone: 1. Was a Breathing Zone Sample collected? Yes 2. If yes, what were the results of the sampling? Was a photograph taken during the unloading activities?^ esoft No ?/i?eso) Shipment Number If- BILL OF LADING - BYPRODUCT MATERIAL 24-HOUR EMERGENCY CONTACT NUMBER/PROVIDER & CONTRACT NAME OR No. (830) 583-4222 Kevin Dziuk (Radiation Safety Officer) CONSIGNOR (Shipper/From): Company Name and Site CONSIGNEE (Receiver/To): Company Name and Site: South Texas Mining Venture LLP - PALANGANA Energy Fuels - BLANDING UTAH ADDRESS: 5781 FM 3196 Benavides, TX 78341 ADDRESS: 6425 S Highway 19 Blanding, UT 84511 SHIPPER TELEPHONE No.: (361)256-3995 CONSIGNEE TELEPHONE No.: (435)678-2221 SHIPPER NRC/STATE LICENSE No.: R06062 SHIPPER USDOT No.: 148604 CARRIER NAME: Cosby Trucking, LLC CARRIER USDOT No.: 298957 SHIPPER/TRANSPORTER INFORMATION CONSIGNEE NRC/STATE LICENSE NO.: UT 1900479 SHIPPER PHMSA REGISTRATION No.: 071111550 027TV CARRIER ADDRESS: 601S 200 E Blanding, UT 84511 N CARRIER PHMSA REGISTRATION No.: 071113 550019V NUMBER OF UNITS HM DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL, ARTICLES, SPECIAL MARKS, EXCEPTIONS UN PSN CLASS Gross WEIGHT KG (LBS) 1 TRAILER UN 2912 RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL, LOW SPECIFIC ACTIVITY (LSA-1) (Solid By-Product Material) Estimated 18,143 (40,000) Activity.. 259 Mbq L 0.007 Ci) Curie x 3.7E = 1 Megabecquerel Volume 459 cubic feet ••••EXCLUSIVE USE SHIPMENT**** CATEGORY OF LABEL(S) APPLIED TO PACKAGE - 2912 EMERGENCY RESPONSE DOCUMENT ATTACHED - 2012 ERG Section 162 This is to certify that the above-named articles are properly classified, described, packaged, marked, and labeled, and are in proper condition for transpbrtatf&Y) according to the applicable regulations of the Department of Transportation. SHIPPER'S SIGNATURE DRIVER'S SIGNATURE DESTINATION SIGNATURE OF INDICATION OF LEAKAGE -7 MMAJL XES, EXPLAIN DATE Ihjf-n DATE//-/ /J* DATE 11-7-/3 • >>'' i I j ' I t • i j - j.'/ • • ,jt t ( , , i ill''1 l " ,< "i i J 1 .!. MM . - ! •:.< | >1' f I 1 • ' i ' • i : I i :: e • . •! m ' ' V) i i , j < . j I T | 11 * ' i t "i : ! i • U! ' NNi i 1.1 '.IS l.i.Hi nrj lin 1 i. 1 i'Mi! i i • (.• «:i fi! n. I Hi , IV. ! 11 f '•»»••- ;; I !','• <( i 't i "' f, 'fiiiiii.. i, i • ii ' i i;f >i,- Hi-' > ijh l .• VIA ')>'>! ' ' < i 'I'. * ie i! I. hi ! bl . I I i. • I I » /n •'/,••: i} f. 'Pit ,M ) I ', i /-i'l 'I | /.":•'« ii 0.0 Pi© Controled Elevation used (Cell 3), 5613.04 Area Elevation Transit Shot Initial shot for trench Top of trench Bottom of trench Initial shot used for material Top of material in trench 5608.84 5602.02 5605792 Top of cell 3 Liner Feet below liner 5608.5 2.58 \ \ / /