DRC-2016-011826 - 0901a0688068f342

‘‘---iiiiUv''
State of Utah
GARY R HERBERT
Governor
Spencer .1 Cox
Lieutenant Governor
Department of
Environmental Quality
Alan Matheson
Executive Director
DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT
AND RADIATION CONTROL
Scott T Anderson
Director
DRC-2016- Oil
MEMORANDUM
TO:File C-2016-94 / /
THROUGH:Phil Goble, Section Manager ^/z*/C
FROM:Russell J. Topham, P.E.
DATE:December 1,2016
SUBJECT: Inspection of Construction of Primary Radon Barrier
Radioactive Materials License UT 1900479 (License)
(EFR) White Mesa Mill, Blanding, Utah.
on Tailings Disposal Cell 2.
- Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
On November 10, 2016, I traveled to the White Mesa Mill to perforin multiple inspections, including an
inspection of placement and compaction of the primary Radon barrier on Tailings Disposal Cell 2, on
behalf of the Utah Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control (DWMRC). The construction
reflects the as-yet unapproved requirements of Reclamation Plan 5.1.
I checked in at the White Mesa Mill at 2:00 PM on November 10, 2016, and asked to see David Turk, Site
Manager for Environmental Health and Safety. Mr. Turk assigned Mr. Steve Hancock to accompany me on
this inspection.
When I arrived at Cell 2, the work crews were already at work. The work crew consists of a manager
(Steve Hancock), a construction superintendent, two bulldozers with operators (one each in the borrow area
and one in the fill area), a loader with operator (in the borrow area), a sheepsfoot roller with operator, a
grader with operator, and three off-road haul trucks and a water truck with operators (all working the fill
areas). Crews were placing the first one-foot lift of Radon barrier on the platform fill.
I requested and received copies of field density reports and laboratory gradation and moisture-density
relationship curves for the work completed the week prior to my visit. Review of the test results reveal that
compaction standards are being met in each work area prior to advancing to the next. DCopies of test
reports appear as an attachment to this Memo.
I walked the areas of Cell 2 that had received primary Radon barrier fill since my last visit, i.e., areas east
of the slimes drain port. I observed the results of placement, conditioning and compaction of the fill,
noting that the surface was unyielding beneath the half-inch or so of loose material shed from the
compactor's cleats.
Finding: EFR appears to have followed applicable provisions of Reclamation Plan 5.1 in constructing the
portions of the cover system installed to date. However, since Reclamation Plan 5.1 remains unapproved
195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City. UT
Mailing Address P O. Box 144880 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4880
Telephone [phone] * Fax [phone] • T D D [phone]
wwtn deq.iitnli.gov
Printed on 100% recycled paper
C-2015-54
Memorandum: Inspection of October 17, 2016
Page 2
as of the date of this Memorandum, the licensee is proceeding at his own risk.
Recommendation: 1 recommend closing out the inspection of November 10, 2016.
I discussed this inspection with Logan Shumway, the Mill Manager, prior to departing.
Attachments: Photo Log
Quality control test results for October 3 1-November 3, 2016.
Photo 1: Looking westward across a finished portion of the primary Cell 2
Radon barrier. Photo taken November 10, 2016.
Photo 3: Looking southeast across the completed portion of the primary Cell 2
Radon barrier to where placement and water conditioning were taking place.
Photo taken November 10, 2016.
Photo 2: Looking west-northwest across the finished portion of the primary
Cell 2 Radon barrier. Photo taken November 10, 2016.
Photo 4: Looking northeast across the area receiving fill. Photo taken
November 10, 2016.
Photo 5: Looking northward across an area of active placement of the primary
Cell 2 Radon barrier. Photo taken November 10, 2016.
Photo 7: Placement of the primary Cell 2 Radon barrier. Photo taken
November 10, 2016.
Photo 6: Looking east-northeast across the finished platform fill and the
primary Cell 2 Radon barrier where work is currently occurring. Photo taken
November 10, 2016.
Photo 8: Loading Radon barrier materials from the borrow stockpile. Photo
taken November 10, 2016.
Total Placed (yd3) 277,726
Daily Avg (yd3) Placed 3,561
■■■■■■Completed Required Needed
Total Proctors 60 56 (4)
Total Gradations 141 139 (2)
MATERIAL TRACKING REPORT Total Densities 636 556 (80)
White Mesa Mill Cell 2 Reclamation
1604-086 Proctor Rate 4629 yd3 (5000)
Radon Barrier Gradation Rate 1970 yd3 (2000)
Density Rate 437 yd3 (500)
DATE YARDS STOCKPILE PLACEMENT LOCATION LIFT LAYER SAMPLES PROCTORS GRADES DENSITIES
6/29/2016 4182 W5 M2 Eastward 1 Radon Barrier 1 6 2 2 0
6/30/2016 4600 W5 Ol-Oll 1 Radon Barrier 1 2 1 2 9
7/1/2016 2091 W5 012-020 1 Radon Barrier 1 2 1 2 10
7/4/2016 NA
7/5/2016 4613 W5 020-024, 02-04 MU Radon Barrier 1 2 1 2 8
7/6/2016 2949 W5 05-015 1 Radon Barrier 1 3 1 3 9
7/7/2016 3413 W5 015-024, N2 1, (-1)Radon Barrier 1 2 1 2 9
7/8/2016 2772 W5 N3-N12 1 Radon Barrier 1 2 0 2 9
7/11/2016 3612 W5 N19-N25 1 Radon Barrier 1 2 0 0 6
7/12/2016 3302 W5 M19-M24 1 Radon Barrier 1 2 1 2 0
7/13/2016 3690 W5 N2-M12 1 Radon Barrier 1 5 1 2 13
7/14/2016 2891 W5 M10-L17 1 Radon Barrier 1 2 3 4 10
7/15/2016 2891 W5 L18-L23 1 Radon Barrier 1 0 0 0 0
7/18/2016 444 W5 L12 1 Radon Barrier 1 2 1 3 8
7/19/2016 1531 W5 L13-K18 1 Radon Barrier 1 0 1 2 0
7/20/2016 4085 W5 K19-K21, M2-L6 1 Radon Barrier 1 0 0 0 6
7/21/2016 3123 W5 L7-L12 1 Radon Barrier 1 2 0 0 8
7/22/2016 2470 W5 L3-L4, L8-L11 1 Radon Barrier 1 2 0 0 6
7/23/2016 2195 W5 K12-J18 1 Radon Barrier 1 0 0 0 0
DATE YARDS STOCKPILE PLACEMENT LOCATION LIFT LAYER SAMPLES PROCTORS GRADES DENSITIES
7/25/2016 4088 W5 K8-J13 1 Radon Barrier 1 0 1 2 12
7/26/2016 3345 W5 J14-120, J18-J20 1 Radon Barrier 1 2 1 2 9
H21/2Q16 3929 W5 121, K2-J6 1 Radon Barrier 1 2 0 2 10
7/28/2016 3929 W5 J7-H14 1 Radon Barrier 1 2 1 2 8
7/29/2016 3203 W5 I15-G20, 02-05 1,2 Radon Barrier 1 2 0 0 8
8/1/2016 3848 W5 06-015 2 Radon Barrier 1 2 0 0 7
8/2/2016 4137 W5 016-023, N2-N7 2 Radon Barrier 1 2 0 4 11
8/3/2016 4096 W3 N8-N14 2 Radon Barrier 1 2 2 4 7
8/4/2016 1327 W3 02-05 3 Radon Barrier 1 0 1 2 0
8/5/2016 NA
8/8/2016 4000 W3 05-017 3 Radon Barrier 1 0 0 0 0
8/9/2016 4002 W3 017-023 3 Radon Barrier 1 3 0 0 15
8/10/2016 3876 W5 N15-N21, 024-022 2 Radon Barrier 1 2 1 3 8
8/11/2016 4195 W5 N23-M19 2 Radon Barrier 1 3 1 2 4
8/12/2016 3168 W5 M5-M12, M23-M24, N3-N4 N 2 Radon Barrier 1 2 0 0 12
8/15/2016 3823 W5 L14- K22 2 Radon Barrier 1 2 0 0 8
8/16/2016 4301 W5, W3 N2-N12 3 Radon Barrier 1 3 1 2 8
8/17/2016 4212 W3 N9-N20 3 Radon Barrier 1 3 2 4 11
8/18/2016 4338 W1 M7-L10 2,3 Radon Barrier 1 4 0 3 11
8/19/2016 3610 W1 M12-L20 3 Radon Barrier 1 2 2 5 14
8/22/2016 4124 W1 K19-K21 3 Radon Barrier 1 3 2 2 8
8/23/2016 4389 W1 M3-M7 L6-L10 2 Radon Barrier 1 3 0 0 3
8/24/2016 4336 W1 J19-J21,K12-K17,L11 2 Radon Barrier 1 3 2 3 9
8/25/2016 4637 W1 L3-L6, K6-K12 2 Radon Barrier 1 2 2 5 11
8/26/2016 3292 W1 J13-J17, 118-121 2 Radon Barrier 1 2 0 0 9
8/29/2016 4354 W1 M2-M6, L7-L11, K12-K13 3 Radon Barrier 1 2 2 4 9
8/30/2016 4242 W1 K14-K17, J19-J21, L2 3 Radon Barrier 1 2 0 0 10
8/31/2016 4283 W1 K3-K7, J8-J11,112-114 2 Radon Barrier 1 2 2 3 7
9/1/2016 3416 W1 115-117, H16-H20 2 Radon Barrier 1 3 0 2 12
9/2/2016 3133 W1 L2-L6, K7-K8 3 Radon Barrier 1 2 0 0 0
DATE YARDS STOCKPILE PLACEMENT LOCATION LIFT LAYER SAMPLES PROCTORS GRADES DENSITIES
9/6/2016 3522 W1 K9-K13 J14-J16 3 Radon Barrier 1 3 3 5 12
9/7/2016 2864 W1 J17-J19, 120-121, L2-L3 3 Radon Barrier 1 0 0 0 0
9/8/2016 3663 W1 K5-K9, J10-J12, 112-120, H20 3 Radon Barrier 1 2 1 3 13
9/9/2016 3292 W1 02-021, N5,N13,N16 3.5 Radon Barrier 1 2 0 0 17
9/12/2016 4248 W1 02-09,N4-N12 3.5 Radon Barrier 1 2 1 2 15
9/13/2016 4160 W1 N13-N23 3.5 Radon Barrier 1 2 0 0 9
9/14/2016 4106 W1 M16-M23 3.5 Radon Barrier 1 3 0 0 10
9/15/2016 4354 W1 N3-N8, M6-M12, 06-011 3.5/4 Radon Barrier 1 0 1 3 7
9/16/2016 3360 W1 M16-M23, 013-024 3.5/4 Radon Barrier 1 2 0 2 9
9/19/2016 4088 W1 N2-N18 3.5 Radon Barrier 1 3 1 3 23
9/20/2016 3893 W1 N19-N23, L13-L16 3.5 Radon Barrier 1 2 0 0 9
9/21/2016 4230 W1 M2, K13-K21 3.5 Radon Barrier 1 2 2 2 17
9/22/2016 4195 W1 K8-K10, J12-J18, 110-117 3.5 Radon Barrier 1 2 1 3 4
9/23/2016 N/A W1 N/A N/A Radon Barrier 1 0 0 0 0
9/26/2016 4283 W1 M2-M15, L9-L21 4 Radon Barrier 1 3 1 3 15
9/27/2016 3229 W1 LI6, K17-K21 4 Radon Barrier 1 2 0 2 17
9/28/2016 4071 W1 M2-M5,L6-L10, Kll 4 Radon Barrier 1 3 0 3 6
9/29/2016 N/A W1 N/A N/A Radon Barrier 1 0 1 2 0
9/30/2016 N/A W1 N/A N/A Radon Barrier 1 0 0 0 0
10/3/2016 3823 W1 K13-K17,J18-J20 4 Radon Barrier 1 2 0 1 8
10/4/2016 4018 W1 K2-K5, L2 4 Radon Barrier 1 1 1 3 7
10/5/2016 3770 W3/W1 L3-L5, K6-K10 4 Radon Barrier 1 0 1 2 0
10/6/2016 4160 W1 J11-J16, 117-118 4 Radon Barrier 1 2 0 0 12
10/7/2016 3735 W1 J7-J10, 112-114 4 Radon Barrier 1 2 0 3 6
10/10/2016 4354 W1 115-117, 119, H15, H16, H18 4 Radon Barrier 1 0 0 0 7
10/11/2016 1112 W1 H19, H20, G20 4 Radon Barrier 1 2,W1 3,E4 0 0 10
10/12/2016 N/A 0 0 0 0
10/13/2016 N/A 0 0 3 0
10/14/2016 N/A 0 0 0 0
DATE YARDS STOCKPILE PLACEMENT LOCATION LIFT LAYER SAMPLES PROCTORS GRADES DENSITIES
10/17/2016 N/A 0 0 0 0
10/18/2016 N/A 0 0 0 0
10/19/2016 N/A 0 0 0 0
10/20/2016 N/A 0 2 6 0
10/21/2016 N/A 0 4 4 0
10/24/2016 N/A 0 0 0 0
10/25/2016 N/A 0 0 0 8
10/26/2016 N/A 0 0 0 0
10/27/2016 1469 E4 034,032,N33-34 1 Radon Barrier 1 0 0 0 0
10/28/2016 3593 E4 M32-34,K34,L33;033,1 Radon Barrier 1 0 0 0 0
10/31/2016 4124 E4 K32-K35,L32/M30-32,030-31 1 Radon Barrier 1 4 0 0 10
11/1/2016 4425 E4 J33-34,K31-32,L30-31,M29-M 1 Radon Barrier 1 0 1 0 10
11/2/2016 4673 E4 N29-30,H32-33,131-34,J30,K2!1 Radon Barrier 1 0 0 0 15
11/3/2016 4248 E4 G32-34,1-130-31,129 1 Radon Barrier 1 3 2 2 8
11/4/2016 2177 E4 J28,K25-28,L27,N27 1 Radon Barrier 1 0 0 0 0
11/7/2016 0 E4 1 Radon Barrier 1 0 0 0 0
11/8/2016 E4 1 Radon Barrier 1
11/9/2016 E4 1 Radon Barrier 1
11/10/2016 E4 1 Radon Barrier 1
11/11/2016 E4 1 Radon Barrier 1
Jones fi Do M i II e
Engineering
Jones & DeMille
16 East 300 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:10/31/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:1873
REPORT NUMBER:095 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:641
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Justin Baker MATERIAL:Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Mill Reclamation SOURCE:E4
PROJECT NUMBER:1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
110.0
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):14.9
TROXLER NUMBER:18336 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROB
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
034 Bottom Right 1 8 119.7 109.8 9.0 99.8
N34 Bottom Right 1 8 113.5 104.1 9.0 *94.6
M34 Bottom Middle 1 6 119.4 111.9 6.8 **98.2
K34 Top Middle 1 8 117.7 109.1 7.9 99.2
L23 Middle Left 1 8 119.6 108.6 10.1 98.7
M33 Middle Left 1 8 122.7 111.7 9.9 **98.0
N33 Middle 1 8 113.7 102.9 10.5 *93.5
033 Middle Left 1 8 116.5 107.1 8.7 97.4
032 Bottom Middle 1 8 120.3 106.1 13.4 96.5
M32 Top Middle 1 8 115.7 106.4 8.7 96.7
COMMENTS
•‘Tests #3 & #6 Correlate with proctor 113.9 (16-S-538)
•Tests #2 and #7 failed, will re-test on 11/2 after material is reworked
ATTACH PICTURE:
L
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 11/02/2016 04 :47 PM
Jones & Do M ilIe
Engineering
*v >
Jones & DeMille
16 East 300 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:11/1/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:2255
REPORT NUMBER:096 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:693
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Ben Giblette MATERIAL:Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Mill Reclamation SOURCE:E4
PROJECT NUMBER:1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
113.9
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):12.6
TROXLER NUMBER:65823 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROB
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
K35 Middle Left 1 6 118.0 108.8 8.5 95.5
K33 Bottom Right 1 6 124.6 112.3 11.0 98.7
K32 Top Right 1 6 121.7 109.0 11.6 95.7
L32 Bottom Left 1 6 122.5 109.7 11.7 96.4
M31 Bottom Right 1 6 127.8 112.4 13.6 98.7
M30 Top Right 1 6 131.2 115.3 13.7 *96.4
N30 Top Middle 1 6 122 5 111.5 9.8 97.9
030 Bottom Right 1 6 132.4 119.0 11.2 *99.5
031 Bottom Left 1 6 122.8 112.4 9.3 98.7
M32 Top Left 1 6 121.8 111.2 9.5 97.6
COMMENTS:
Tests #6 & 8 correlate with proctor 119.6 (16-S-541)
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 11/02/2016 08 :52 AM
Jones & DeMi//e
Engineering
v <
Jones & DeMille
16 East 300 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:11/2/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:2255
REPORT NUMBER:097 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:693
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Ben Giblette MATERIAL:Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Mill Reclamation SOURCE:E4
PROJECT NUMBER:1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
113.9
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):12.6
TROXLER NUMBER:65823 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROB
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
J34 BR 1 6 124.8 111.6 11.9 97.9
J33 MM 1 6 118.0 107.1 10.2 *98.7
K32 MM 1 6 131.7 117.9 11.7 *98.6
L31 BM 1 6 122.5 109.2 12.2 95.8
M30 MM 1 6 121.3 110.4 9.9 97.0
N30 ML 1 6 117.0 108.9 7.4 95.6
N29 ML 1 6 123.8 114.0 8.6 100.0
M29 BR 1 6 126.2 114.0 10.7 100.1
L30 BM 1 6 123.3 112.8 9.3 99.0
K31 BL 1 6 119.7 110.8 8.0 97.3
COMMENTS:
•density used 119.6/8.9
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 11/09/2016 08 :20 AM
Jonas & Da M il I a
Engtnaarincj
Jones & DeMille
16 East 300 South
Montlcello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:11/2/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:2255
REPORT NUMBER:098 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:693
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Ben Giblette MATERIAL:Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Mill Reclamation SOURCE:E4
PROJECT NUMBER:1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
113.9
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):12.6
TROXLER NUMBER:65823 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROS
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
J32 BM 1 6 117.6 108.3 8.6 95.1
I33 BM 1 6 127.1 113.6 11.9 99.7
134 BM 1 6 121.4 110.4 9.9 96.9
N34 BR 1 6 122.8 113.4 8.3 *99.5
N33 MR 1 6 127.2 113.1 12.4 *99.3
COMMENTS:
*N33 & N34 are retests
ATTACH PICTURE:
L
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 11/07/2016 07 :41 AM
Jones St DeMille
Engineering
v «
Jones & DeMille
16 East 300 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:11/3/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:2268
REPORT NUMBER:099 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:699
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Ben Giblette MATERIAL:Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Mill Cell # 2 Reclamation SOURCE:E4
PROJECT NUMBER:1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
113.9
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):12.6
TROXLER NUMBER:65823 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROB
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
H33 MR 1 6 121.9 108.9 11.9 95.6
H32 BM 1 6 126.3 117.1 7.9 97.9
131 MM 1 6 120.1 111.3 7.8 97.7
130 BM 1 6 126.4 113.6 11.2 99.8
K29 BR 1 6 124.8 113.3 10.1 99.5
L29 BL 1 6 120.5 111.8 7.7 98.2
M28 MM 1 6 123.5 114.2 8.2 100.2
N28 ML 1 6 113.4 106.6 6.3 96.9
COMMENTS:
Max. Density and Opt. Moisture used on N28 > 110.0/14.9
Max. Density and Opt. Moisture used on H32 > 119.6/8.9
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 11/07/2016 07 :32 AM
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Curve No. 167
Preparation Method As received
Rammer: Wt 5.5 lb. Drop 12 in.
Type ___Pie Shaped Hammer
Layers: No. three Blows per 56
Mold Size 0.075 cu. ft.
Test Performed on Material
Passing 3/4 in. Sieve
%>3/4 in.%<No.200
Atterberg (D 4318): LL PI
NM (D 2216) _______ Sp.G. (D 854) 2.62
USCS (D 2487)
AASHTO (M 145)
Date: Sampled 10/31/16
Received 10/31/16
Tested 11/1/16
Tested By Justin Baker
COMPACTION TESTING DATA
1 2 3 4 5 6
WM +WS 9273.1 9543.9 9759.1 9940.1 9903.8
WM 5646.2 5646.2 5646.2 5646.2 5646.2
WW + T#1 908.6 934.5 907.9 926.0 907.0
WD + T #1 869.9 880.9 852.1 859.4 822.6
TARE #1 406.4 388.8 405.2 408.0 386.4
WW + T #2
WD + T #2
TARE #2
MOIST.8.3 10.9 12.5 14.8 19.3
DRY DENS.98.4 103.3 107.5 110.0 104.9
SIEVE TEST RESULTS
AASHTOT27 AASHTOT11
TEST RESULTS
Maximum dry density = 110.0 pcf
Material Description
Radon Barrier
Optimum moisture = 14.9 %
Project No. 1604-086 Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Remarks:
C Location: E4 - White Chalk Sample Number: M16-S-167
JONES & DEMILLE ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield. Utah
Checked by: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
Figure
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Curve No. 168
t5
Q.
U3c<DTl
S'
Q
Water content, %
Preparation Method As received
Rammer: Wt. 5.5 lb. Drop 12 in.
Type Pie Shaped Hammer
Layers: No. three Blows per 56
Mold Size 0.075 CU. ft.
Test Performed on Material
Passing 3/4 in.Sieve
%>3/4 in. 0.6 _ %<No.200 56.3
Atterberg (D 4318): LL PI
NM (D 2216)_ Sp.G. (D 854)2.62
USCS (D 2487)
AASHTO (M 145)
Date: Sampled 10/31/16
Received 10/31/16
Tested 11/1/16
Tested By Justin Baker
COMPACTION TESTING DATA
AA!5HTO T 99 Method D Standard
1 2 3 4 5 6
WM +WS 9309.6 9484.2 9884.6 10054.9 9895.6
WM 5646.1 5646.1 5646.1 5646.1 5646.1
WW + T #1 927.1 912.6 934.5 918.0 914.0
WD + T #1 888.9 867.2 879.3 846.0 823.0
TARE #1 389.1 387.2 409.8 386.7 385.5
WW + T #2
WD + T #2
TARE #2
MOIST.7.6 9.5 11.8 15.7 20.8
DRY DENS.100.0 103.1 111.5 112.0 103.4
SIEVE TEST RESULTS
AASHTOT27 AASHTOT11
Opening Size % Passing Specs.
6"100.0 100.0
1"100.0
#200 56.3 10.0-100.0
TEST RESULTS Material Description
Maximum dry density = 113.9 pcf
Optimum moisture = 13.6 %
Project No. 1604-086 Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Radon Barrier - Red Silty
Remarks:
O Location: E4 -100' from North EdgeSample Number: M16-S-168
JONES & DEMILLE ENGINEERING INC.
____ _____ Richfield. Utah____ _____
Checked by: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
Figure
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Curve No. 166
Water content, %
Preparation Method As received
Rammer: Wt 5.5 lb.Drop 12 in.
Type Pie Shaped Hammer
Layers: No. three Blows per 56
Mold Size 0.075 CU. ft.
Test Performed on Material
Passing 3/4 in.Sieve
%>3/4 in. 0.6 %<No.200 56.2
Atterberg (D 4318): LL PI
NM (D 2216)Sp.G. (D 854) 2.62
USCS (D 2487)
AASHTO (M 145)
Date: Sampled 10/31/16
Received 10/31/16
Tested 11/1/16
Tested By Justin Baker
COMPACTION TESTING DATA
AASSHTO T 99 Method D Standard
1 2 3 4 5 6
WM +WS 9479.2 9828.0 10008.2 9948.7
WM 5647.0 5647.0 5647.0 5647.0
WW + T #1 929.8 922.9 920.9 939.1
WD + T #1 882.8 860.4 854.3 828.2
TARE #1 406.2 388.8 407.8 405.2
WW + T #2
WD + T #2
TARE #2
MOIST.9.9 13.3 14.9 26.2
DRY DENS.102.5 108.5 111.6 100.2
SIEVE TEST RESULTS
AASHTOT27 AASHTOT11
Opening Size % Passing Specs.
6"100.0 100.0
1"100.0
#200 56.2 10.0-100.0
TEST RESULTS ___
Maximum dry density = 113.4 pcf
Optimum moisture = 17.5 %
Project No. 1604-086 Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
O Location: E4 - White Chalk Sample Number: M16-S-166
JONES & DEMILLE ENGINEERING INC
Material Description
Radon Barrier
Remarks:
Checked by:Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
Richfield, Utah Figure