Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDRC-2016-011304 - 0901a06880682d26jSSSAii ~--i h 9 by State of Utah GARY R HERBERT Governor Spencer .1 Cox Lieulenanl Governor Department of Environmental Quality Alan Matheson Executive Director DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT AND RADIATION CONTROL Scott T Anderson Director . DRC-Z0i6-0U3n MEMORANDUM TO: THROUGH: FROM: DATE: File C-2016-87 Phil Goble, Section Manager /3E6 Russell J. Topham, P.E. May 2,2016 SUBJECT: Yellowcake Dryer Inspection Module Development Recommendations. Radioactive Materials License UT1900479 (License) - Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. (EFR) White Mesa Mill, Standing, Utah The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRG), while conducting the Integrated Materials Performance Evaluation Program (IMPEP) inspection of the Utah Agreement State Program between July 27 and 31, 2015, asked that the DWMRC develop a yellowcake dryer inspection module. This module would answer concerns raised in the NRG Information Notice 1999-03, Revision 1, Exothermic Reactions Involving Dried Uranium Oxide Powder (Yellowcake), dated March 4, 2014 (the Circular) and its attachment (the Enclosure). Among the documents I reviewed are the identified circular and attachment, and a confidential development draft of the EFR Standard Operating Procedure, Book 5, Section 2, Yellowcake Precipitation - Drying and Packaging (the SOP). During an inspection trip to the White Mesa Mill, I took the opportunity to explore the mill’s process chemistry, dryer operation, solvent extraction processes, and other measures taken to provide a product that will not undergo chemical reactions following placement in drums. Based upon the information I have gathered, I recommend against establishing a dryer inspection module for the process used at the White Mesa Mill. The following discussion provides my rationale. The Circular chronicled nine incidents where operators had received drummed yellowcake that had developed sufficient internal pressure following sealing of the drum lid to project yellowcake onto the individual opening the drum. The investigations identified buildup of oxygen gas in sealed containers as the fundamental cause of the incidents. Root cause analysis identified several factors that contributed, or could contribute, to the pressure buildup in the drum. These root causes included “decomposition of residual uranyl peroxide hydrates or hydrogen peroxide in the dried yellowcake product due to incomplete drying, and the presence of organic contaminants in the finished product (Circular, p. 2). Process Chemistry The literature clearly identifies the use of ammonia rather than hydrogen peroxide as a process chemical where chemical reactions proceeded following placement of the product in the drum (Enclosure, p. 1). The 195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT Mailing Address. PO Box 144880 • Salt Lake Citv, UT 84114-4880 Telephone (801) 536-0200 • Fax (801) 536-0222 • T D D (801) 903-3978 umnv.deq.utnh.gov Printed on 100% recycled paper Project C-2016-87 Memorandum: Yellowcake Dryer Inspection Module Development Page 2 White Mesa Mill uses ammonia rather than hydrogen peroxide. Thus, the chemistry discussed in the Enclosure does not apply to this case. Drying Process Unit According to the Enclosure, the use of a calciner as a drying process unit appears effective in eliminating the problem of incomplete reaction at the time of placing the product into drums; all known incidents occurred where the process did not use a calciner (Enclosure, p. 1). Energy Fuels uses a calciner as the drying process unit. Drying Temperature The Circular identifies a required temperature of 14720F to convert uranyl peroxide to UO3, thus completing the process chemistry. The Ammonia process in use at the White Mesa Mill does not involve this chemical transformation. Thus, the minimum temperature identified in the Circular does not apply to the process chemistry in question. The calciner operating temperature range (1200 to 1400°F at the sixth and final hearth') appears sufficient to ensure completion of the ammonia-based process chemistry. Residual Organic Contaminants Incomplete removal of organic solvents used in the uranium recovery process, and introduction of lubricants into process units form the likely sources of organic contaminants in the finished process. The White Mesa Mill recovers and reuses organic solvents, and chemical process monitoring shows that virtually no organic solvent reaches the dryer. Additional evidence for the effectiveness of the solvent recovery process includes the lack of loss of integrity of rubber liners in process vessels downstream of the solvent extraction circuit. Finally, at the operating temperature of the calciner, no remaining organic solvent would survive to exit the dryer. Lubricants inadvertently introduced into the process would suffer the same fate. 1 Plant operators report having attempted to meet a 1600°F operating temperature in the dryer. The operators report that temperatures above 1450°F led to damage (melting) of some dryer components.