DRC-2016-010343 - 0901a0688066fd15

State of Utah
GARY R HERBERT
Governor
Spencer J. Cox
Lieutenant Governor
Department of
Environmental Quality
Alan Matheson
Executive Director
DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT
AND RADIATION CONTROL
Scott T. Anderson
Director
DPnC-201^-0103^-3
MEMORANDUM
TO: File C-2016-94
THROUGH:
FROM:
Phil Goble, Section Manager r j/
Russell J. Topham, P.E. &
DATE:September 22, 2016
SUBJECT:Inspection of Construction of Primary Radon Barrier on Tailings Disposal Cell 2.
Radioactive Materials License UT 1900479 (License) - Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
(EFR) White Mesa Mill, Blanding, Utah.
On August 23, 2016,1 traveled to the White Mesa Mill to perform multiple inspections, including an
inspection of placement and compaction of the primary Radon barrier on Tailings Disposal Cell 2, on
behalf of the Utah Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control (DWMRC). The construction
reflects the as-yet unapproved requirements of Reclamation Plan 5.1.
I checked in at the White Mesa Mill at 7:40 AM on August 23, 2016, in company with two other inspectors
from the DWMRC who were there for other purposes, and asked to see David Turk, Site Manager for
Environmental Health and Safety. Mr. Turk assigned Mr. Steve Hancock to accompany me on this
inspection.
When 1 arrived at Cell 2, the work crews were already at work. The work crew consists of a manager
(Steve Hancock), a construction superintendent, two bulldozers with operators (one in the borrow area and
one in the fill area), a loader with operator (in the borrow area), a sheepsfoot roller and road grader with
operators (in the fill area), and three off-road haul trucks and a water truck with operators (working both
the borrow and the fill areas). 1 walked the areas of Cell 2 that had received fill, observed the placement,
conditioning and compaction of the fill, and observed one density test taken on the fill. 1 also reviewed the
stockpiles available to the crew, and observed the borrow operation.
Field crews were taking material from Stockpile W1 (see attached map) during my inspection. Some
material had also been taken from Stockpile W3 to make room for equipment to pass efficiently back and
forth through that area. Average daily production was approximately 3,400 yd3 per day as of the time of
the inspection. Density tests were taken approximately every 460 yd3, with locations chosen randomly
within each lift, and representing the middle 8” if each lift. This has resulted in 274 density tests taken
versus 253 required at the rate of one for every 500 yd3 as specified in Rec Plan 5.1. All but a half-dozen
tests revealed density meeting or exceeding standard, with the failing areas reworked and retested until
achieving a satisfactory result. Density standards reflect laboratory tests taken every 5,000 yd3, as required
in Rec Plan 5.1.
195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144880 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4880
Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone] • T D D. [phone]
■wmv.deq.utah.gov
Printed on 100% recycled paper
C-2015-54
Memorandum: Inspection of August 24, 2016
Page 2
Following the review of field activities, I returned to the Mill office, and reviewed copies of laboratory
analyses and field density testing to confirm that the crews used appropriate materials and achieved
acceptable results in the placement effort. The results of the testing are not summarized here, since a good
summary was provided. That summary appears in the attachment to this report.
Finding: EFR appears to have followed applicable provisions of Reclamation Plan 5.1 in constructing the
portions of the cover system installed to date. However, since Reclamation Plan 5.1 remains unapproved
as of the date of this Memorandum, the licensee is proceeding at his own risk.
Recommendation: I recommend closing out the inspection of August 24, 2016.
I discussed this inspection with Logan Shumway, the Mill Manager, prior to departing.
Attachments: Maps: Cover Material Borrow Stockpile Locations
Proposed Mini-piezometer Locations
Fill Monitoring Survey Grid
Test Results: Material Tracking Report through August 19, 2016
Field Density Test Reports through August 19, 2016
Compaction test (Proctor) Reports through August 17,2016
Particle Size Distribution Reports through August 19, 2016
Photo Log
Total Placed (yd )
Daily Avg (yd3) Placed
126,281
3,413
Completed Required Needed
Total Proctors 27 26 (1)
Total Gradations 65 64 (1)
MATERIAL TRACKING REPORT Total Densities 274 253 (21)
White Mesa Mill Cell 2 Reclamation
1604-086 Proctor Rate 4677 yd3 (5000)
Radon Barrier Gradation Rate 1943 yd3 (2000)
Density Rate 461 yd3 (500)
DATE YARDS STOCKPILE PLACEMENT LOCATION LIFT LAYER SAMPLES PROCTORS GRADES DENSITIES
6/29/2016 4182 W5 M2 Eastward 1 Radon Barrier 1 6 2 2 0
6/30/2016 4600 W5 Ol-Oll 1 Radon Barrier 1 2 1 2 9
7/1/2016 2091 W5 012-020 1 Radon Barrier 1 2 1 2 10
7/4/2016 NA
7/5/2016 4613 W5 020-024, 02-04 MU Radon Barrier 1 2 1 2 8
7/6/2016 2949 W5 05-015 1 Radon Barrier 1 3 1 3 9
7/7/2016 3413 W5 015-024, N2 l, (-1)Radon Barrier 1 2 1 2 9
7/8/2016 2772 W5 N3-N12 1 Radon Barrier 1 2 0 2 9
7/11/2016 3612 W5 N19-N25 1 Radon Barrier 1 2 0 0 6
7/12/2016 3302 W5 M19-M24 1 Radon Barrier 1 2 1 2 0
7/13/2016 3690 W5 N2-M12 l Radon Barrier 1 5 1 2 13
7/14/2016 2891 W5 M10-L17 i Radon Barrier 1 2 3 4 10
7/15/2016 2891 W5 L18-L23 1 Radon Barrier 1 0 0 0 0
7/18/2016 444 W5 L12 l Radon Barrier 1 2 1 3 8
7/19/2016 1531 W5 L13-K18 l Radon Barrier 1 0 1 2 0
7/20/2016 4085 W5 K19-K21, M2-L6 1 Radon Barrier 1 0 0 0 6
7/21/2016 3123 W5 L7-L12 1 Radon Barrier 1 2 0 0 8
7/22/2016 2470 W5 L3-L4, L8-L11 l Radon Barrier 1 2 0 0 6
7/23/2016 2195 W5 K12-J18 l Radon Barrier 1 0 0 0 0
DATE YARDS STOCKPILE PLACEMENT LOCATION LIFT LAYER SAMPLES PROCTORS GRADES DENSITIES
7/25/2016 4088 W5 K8-J13 1 Radon Barrier 1 0 1 2 12
7/26/2016 3345 W5 J14-I20, J18-J20 1 Radon Barrier 1 2 1 2 9
1/21/2016 3929 W5 121, K2-J6 1 Radon Barrier 1 2 0 2 10
7/28/2016 3929 W5 J7-H14 1 Radon Barrier 1 2 1 2 8
7/29/2016 3203 W5 I15-G20, 02-05 1,2 Radon Barrier 1 2 0 0 8
8/1/2016 3848 W5 06-015 2 Radon Barrier 1 2 0 0 7
8/2/2016 4137 W5 016-023, N2-N7 2 Radon Barrier 1 2 0 4 11
8/3/2016 4096 W3 N8-N14 2 Radon Barrier 1 2 2 4 7
8/4/2016 1327 W3 02-05 3 Radon Barrier 1 0 1 2 0
8/5/2016 NA
8/8/2016 4000 W3 05-017 3 Radon Barrier 1 0 0 0 0
8/9/2016 4002 W3 017-023 3 Radon Barrier 1 3 0 0 15
8/10/2016 3876 W5 N15-N21, 024-022 2 Radon Barrier 1 2 1 3 8
8/11/2016 4195 W5 N23-M19 2 Radon Barrier 1 3 1 2 4
8/12/2016 3168 W5 M5-M12, M23-M24, N3-N4 N 2 Radon Barrier 1 2 0 0 12
8/15/2016 3823 W5 L14- K22 2 Radon Barrier 1 2 0 0 8
8/16/2016 4301 W5, W3 N2-N12 3 Radon Barrier 1 3 1 2 8
8/17/2016 4212 W3 N9-N20 3 Radon Barrier 1 3 2 4 11
8/18/2016 4338 W1 M7-L10 2,3 Radon Barrier 1 4 0 3 11
8/19/2016 3610 W1 M12-L20 3 Radon Barrier 1 2 2 5 14
8/22/2016
8/23/2016
8/24/2016
8/25/2016
8/26/2016
Jon&s Si OgMUIg
E ngi ne&rt ng
Jones & DeMille
16 East 200 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 -Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:6/27/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:2629
REPORT NUMBER:006 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:649
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Trent Sonderegger MATERIAL:Interim Layer
PROJECT NAME:white mesa cell reclamation SOURCE:stockpile 1 (W6)
PROJECT NUMBER: 1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
115.8
ENGINEER:Scoot Flannery OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):9.9
TROXLER NUMBER: 64340 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):80
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROB
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
k3 Interim Top Lift 6"110.99 95.8
k6 Interim Top Lift 6"109.77 94.8
j11 Interim Top Lift 6"113.92 98.4
j14 Interim Top Lift 6"114.04 98.5
i19 Interim Top Lift 6"109.89 94.9
h16 Interim Top Lift 6"117.58 101.5
n4 Interim Top Lift 6" 113.92 98.4
n6 Interim Top Lift 6" 123.32 106.5
n12 Interim Top Lift 6"116 100.2
n18 Interim Top Lift 6"115.3 109.5 5.3 94.6
COMMENTS:
I - ............................. ........ ..............................................................................1
ATTACH PICTURE:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 07/05/201611:52AM
l ..............1.........
Jones Si De M ilIe
Engineering
Jones & DeMille
16 East 200 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 -Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:6/30/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:2637
REPORT NUMBER:007 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=: 652
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Trent Sonderegger MATERIAL:Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:Cell 2 Reclamation SOURCE:Stockpile 1
PROJECT NUMBER:1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
115.8
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):13
TROXLER NUMBER:64340 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95
TEST STATION OFFSET /LIFT DEPTH DENSITY DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
011 SE corner Radon Barrier/
Lift 1
8"131.7 118.2 13.5 102.4
O10 SE corner Radon Barrier /
Lift 1
8"122 111.4 10.5 96.2
09 Center Radon Barrier/
Lift 1
8"123.7 111.1 12.6 96
08 Center Radon Barrier /
Lift 1
8"121.7 110.2 11.5 95.2
07 Center-South Radon Barrier/
Lift 1
8"122.5 112.1 10.5 96.8
06 Center-South Radon Barrier /
Lift 1
8"131.1 118.5 12.6 102.4
05 Center Radon Barrier /
Lift 1
8"120.5 111.3 8.3 96.1
04 Center Radon Barrier /
Lift 1
8"122.7 112.5 9.1 97.1
03 Center-East Radon Barrier /
Liftl
8"124.9 114.1 9.5 98.5
COMMENTS:
L
ATTACH PICTURE:
I I
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 07/05/201611:30AM
Jon&s & DeMilles
Engineering
Jones & DeMille
16 East 200 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 -Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:7/1/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:2646
REPORT NUMBER:008 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:649
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Trent Sonderegger MATERIAL:Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Cell Reclamation SOURCE:Stockpile 1
PROJECT NUMBER:1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
115.8
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):13
TROXLER NUMBER:64340 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%): 95
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROB
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
012 Center RB Lift 1 8"130.6 117.8 10.9 101.8
013 C RB Lift 1 8"128.5 114.6 12.1 99
014 C RB Lift 1 8”130.3 116.7 11.6 100.8
015 c RB Lift 1 8"127.4 114.3 11.5 98.7
016 c RB Lift 1 8"128.8 117.5 9.6 101.5
017 C-North RB Lift 1 8"121.5 111.8 8.7 96.5
018 C-Northwest RB Lift 1 8" 119.9 109.8 9.2 99.8
019 C RB Lift 1 8"131.7 118.3 11.3 102.1
020 C RB Lift 1 8"130.4 115.1 13.3 99.4
021 C RB Lift 1 8"123.4 110.7 11.5 95.6
COMMENTS:
L
ATTACH PICTURE:
L
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 07/05/201611:22AM
Jones & Do M tile
Engineering
Jones & DeMille
16 East 200 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:7/7/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:2636
REPORT NUMBER:011 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:661
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Trent Sonderegger MATERIAL:Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Cell Reclamation SOURCE:W5
PROJECT NUMBER:1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
116.1
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):13
TROXLER NUMBER:64340 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROB
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
015 Btm Rt.2 6 121.9 112.5 8.3 96.9
017 Mid-Mid 2 6 123.5 113.7 8.6 97.9
018 Mid-Mid 2 6 127.0 116.9 8.6 100.7
019 Mid-btm 2 6 127.9 117.1 9.2 100.9
020 Mid-btm 2 6 124.5 115.6 7.7 99.6
021 Mid-Mid 2 6 119.8 112.4 6.6 96.8
022 Mid-Mid 2 6 119.2 111.4 7.1 95.9
023 Mid-btm 2 6 121.2 113.0 7.3 97.4
024 Mid-Mid 2 6 122.9 113.5 8.3 97.7
N2 Mid-top-left 1 6 126.8 117.1 8.3 100.9
COMMENTS:
Test #1 was re-test for failed test yesterday.
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 07/14/2016 04 :39 PM
Jones DeMf/fe
Engineering
Jones & DeMille
16 East 200 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:7/8/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:2657
REPORT NUMBER:012 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:658
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Trent Sonderegger MATERIAL:Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Cell Reclamation SOURCE:Stockpile 1-W6
PROJECT NUMBER:1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
116.1
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):13
TROXLER NUMBER:64340 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROB
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
N3 Top-top 1 6 128.9 118.3 9.9 101.9
N4 top-top 1 6 125.3 114.5 9.4 98.6
N5 top-top 1 6 131.1 120.4 8.9 103.7
N6 top-top 1 6 125.5 114.6 9.5 98.7
N7 center-right 1 6 121.8 111.7 9.0 96.2
N9 top-left 1 6 133.2 118.8 12.1 102.4
N10 top-right-
center
1 6 129.1 115.5 11.8 99.5
N11 Center-top 1 6 124.3 111.9 11.0 96.4
N12 center-cent 1 6 124.5 115.1 8.2 99.1
COMMENTS:
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 07/11/2016 09:13 AM
Jonas St Da M files
Enginesering
Jones & DeMille
16 East 200 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:7/13/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=: 645
REPORT NUMBER:015 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:2647
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Riley Vane MATERIAL: Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Cell Reclamation SOURCE: W5
PROJECT NUMBER: 1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
116.1
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):13.0
TROXLER NUMBER:64340 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROB
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
M23 Center Center 1 8 126.5 114.5 10.4 98.6
M22 Top Right 1 8 120.0 110.9 8.3 95.5
M21 Center Left 1 6 128.3 118.2 8.6 101.8
M20 Center Left 1 8 123.8 114.7 8.0 98.8
M19 Center Center 1 8 125.5 115.5 8.7 99.4
M18 Center Left 1 8 123.1 111.6 10.3 96.2
M17 Center Center 1 8 121.6 111.2 9.3 95.8
COMMENTS:
Material placed on 7/12/16.
Test #1 failed. Material to be conditioned and re-compacted. Will test again tomorrow.
'Tests #1 and #2 were retested 7/14/16. Data reflects most recent test.
ATTACH PICTURE:
I „ - ■ , ----- , „ .1
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 07/14/2016 05 :06 PM
■*. « ........ •||•
Jones & DeMille
E n tj i nearing
Jones & DeMille
16 East 200 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:7/14/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:2636
REPORT NUMBER:016 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=: 653
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Riley Vane MATERIAL: Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Cell Reclamation SOURCE:W5
PROJECT NUMBER: 1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
116.1
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):13.0
TROXLER NUMBER:64340 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROB
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
N3 Center Center 1 6 117.7 111.0 6.0 95.6
N4 Center Center 1 8 130.2 118.4 10.0 102.0
N5 Bottom Left 1 8 125.1 113.4 10.2 97.7
N6 Bottom
Center
1 8 123.8 113.1 9.5 97.4
N7 Bottom
Center
1 8 125.3 114.1 9.8 98.3
M8 Top Center 1 6 126.5 115.2 9.8 99.2
M8 Top Right 1 6 122.2 112.9 8.3 97.2
M9 Bottom Right 1 6 122.8 113.1 8.5 97.5
M11 Center Left 1 6 122.9 112.5 9.3 96.9
M12 Top Center 1 8 124.4 113.1 10.0 97.4
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 07/14/2016 05 :17 PM
Jones & DeMi//e
En <j i n eering
Jones & DeMille
16 East 200 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:7/11/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=: 2615
REPORT NUMBER:013 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=: 644
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Riley Vane MATERIAL:Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Cell Reclamation SOURCE: W5
PROJECT NUMBER:1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
116.1
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):13.0
TROXLER NUMBER:64340 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROS
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
N13 Center Center 1 8 124.2 113.6 9.3 97.9
N14 Bottom
Center
1 8 124.4 115.4 7.9 99.4
N15 Bottom
Center
1 8 126.8 116.3 9.0 100.2
N16 Bottom Right 1 8 119.1 111.9 6.5 96.3
N17 Bottom Right 1 8 128.1 117.1 9.4 100.9
N18 Bottom
Center
1 8 126.1 112.4 12.2 96.8
COMMENTS:
L
ATTACH PICTURE:
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 07/14/2016 04 :43 PM
Jones K DeMiIIe
Engineering
Jones & DeMille
16 East 200 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:7/13/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=: 645
REPORT NUMBER:014 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:2647
TECHNICIAN’S NAME:Riley Vane MATERIAL: Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Cell Reclamation SOURCE: W5
PROJECT NUMBER: 1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
116.1
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):13.0
TROXLER NUMBER:64340 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROS
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
N19 Bottom Right 1 6 128.4 117.9 8.9 101.6
N20 Center Center 1 6 122.3 112.9 8.3 97.3
N21 Center Left 1 8 119.1 112.1 7.0 96.6
N22 Center Center 1 8 127.8 118.4 7.9 102.0
N23 Center Center 1 6 124.7 114.7 8.5 99.0
M16 Top Right 1 6 121.4 110.5 9.9 95.1
COMMENTS:
Material placed on 7/11/16.
ATTACH PICTURE:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 07/14/2016 04 :44 PM
Jones £i DeM ills
Engineering
Jones & DeMille
16 East 200 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:7/18/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:649
REPORT NUMBER:017 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:2648
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Riley Vane MATERIAL: Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Cell Reclamation SOURCE:W5
PROJECT NUMBER:1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
116.1
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%): 13.0
TROXLER NUMBER: 64340 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0
TEST RESULTS
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROB
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
M11 Bottom Left 1 8 122.6 114.9 6.8 98.9
M13 Bottom Left 1 8 124.2 115.5 7.6 99.5
L14 Top Right 1 8 119.2 112.2 6.3 96.6
COMMENTS:
Material placed on 7/14/16.
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 07/18/2016 06 :09 PM
Jones •& DeMrJJe
Engineering
-v «
Jones & DeMille
16 East 200 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:7/18/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=: 649
REPORT NUMBER:018 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:2648
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Riley Vane MATERIAL:Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Cell Reclamation SOURCE: W5
PROJECT NUMBER:1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
116.1
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):13.0
TROXLER NUMBER:64340 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROB
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
L22 Bottom Right 1 6 126.1 117.6 7.3 101.3
L21 Center Left 1 8 125.3 118.6 5.7 102.1
L19 Center Center 1 6 122.7 116.2 5.6 100.1
L18 Top Center 1 8 120.0 114.1 5.2 98.2
L10 Top Right 1 8 121.2 113.4 6.9 97.7
COMMENTS:
Material placed on 7/15/16.
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 07/18/2016 06 :14 PM
Jontis & De M ilIs
Engineering
Jones & DeMille
16 East 200 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:7/20/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:2657
REPORT NUMBER:019 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:655
TECHNICIAN’S NAME: Riley Vane MATERIAL:Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Cell Reclamation SOURCE:W5
PROJECT NUMBER: 1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
116.1
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):13.0
TROXLER NUMBER: 64340 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0
TEST STATION OFFSET /LIFT DEPTH DENSITY DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
L13 Center Right 1 6 128.4 118.9 8.0 102.4
L14 Center Left 1 8 125.6 116.6 7.7 100.4
L15 Bottom Right 1 8 124.7 113.7 9.5 97.9
K16 Top Right 1 8 129.3 116.2 11.2 100.1
K17 Top Right 1 8 121.1 111.2 8.9 95.8
K18 Top Right 1 8 129.3 116.7 10.8 100.5
COMMENTS
Material placed on 7/18 & 7/19
ATTACH PICTURE:
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 07/20/2016 03 :02 PM
Jones Si DeMiJ/e
Engineering
Jones & DeMille
16 East 200 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:7/21/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:2444
REPORT NUMBER: 020 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:679
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Riley Vane MATERIAL:Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Cell Reclamation SOURCE:W5
PROJECT NUMBER:1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
116.1
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%): 13.0
TROXLER NUMBER:65824 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROB
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
K19 Top Left 1 8 129.9 118.2 9.9 101.8
K20 Center Left 1 8 125.5 113.5 10.6 97.8
K20 Center Right 1 8 123.5 113.5 8.6 97.7
K21 Center Left 1 8 123.0 112.0 9.8 96.4
M2 Top Right 1 6 120.3 112.1 7.3 96.5
M4 Center Left 1 6 124.3 110.5 12.5 95.2
L4 Center Right 1 8 126.6 115.5 9.6 99.5
L6 Top Center 1 8 125.5 115.1 9.1 99.1
COMMENTS:
Placed on 7/20/16.
ATTACH PICTURE:
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 07/21/2016 04 :02 PM
Jon&s Si OgMUIg
E n c; i n GGrincj
Jones & DeMille
16 East 200 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:7/22/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:
REPORT NUMBER:021 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Riley Vane MATERIAL: Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Cell Reclamation SOURCE: W5
PROJECT NUMBER: 1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE 116.1
DENSITY (PCF):
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%): 13.0
TROXLER NUMBER:65824 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%): 95.0
TEST STATION OFFSET /LIFT DEPTH DENSITY DENSITY
% MOISTURE % COMPACTION
L7 Top Right 1 8 130.3 119.5 9.0 102.9
L8 Center Center 1 8 124.0 114.6 8.2 98.7
L9 Bottom Right 1 8 118.5 110.7 7.0 95.3
L10 Bottom Right 1 8 119.6 111.2 7.6 95.8
L11 Center Center 1 8 116.7 110.3 5.5 95.3
L12 Bottom Right 1 8 116.9 110.6 5.7 95.3
COMMENTS:
Material placed on 7/21/16. From backside of stockpile W5. Expecting a proctor on this material next week.
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 07/22/2016 03 :49 PM
Jones S DeMille>
Engineering
Jones & DeMille
16 East 200 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:7/25/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:2458
REPORT NUMBER:022 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=: 678
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Trent Sonderegger MATERIAL:Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Cell Reclamation SOURCE:W5
PROJECT NUMBER:1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
116.1
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):13
TROXLER NUMBER: 65824 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROB
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
L8 T-R 1 6 122.8 116.2 5.8 100.1
L9 C-R 1 6 120.5 112.0 7.6 96.5
L10 B-R 1 6 117.0 111.4 5.0 96.0
L11 B-R 1 6 119.3 112.2 6.3 96.7
K12 T-R 1 6 118.0 112.5 4.9 96.9
K14 T-L 1 6 116.0 110.6 4.9 95.3
K15 L-C 1 6 121.9 115.4 5.6 99.4
K16 C-L 1 6 121.4 115.9 4.7 99.8
K17 C 1 6 116.4 110.9 5.0 95.5
J18 T-L 1 6 116.0 110.5 5.0 95.2
COMMENTS:
1 I
ATTACH PICTURE:
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 07/25/2016 11 :32 AM
Jones & DeMil/e
Engineer!' n cj
Jones & DeMille
16 East 200 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:7/25/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=: 2458
REPORT NUMBER:022.2 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=: 678
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Trent Sonderegger MATERIAL:Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Cell Reclamation SOURCE:W5
PROJECT NUMBER: 1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
116.1
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):13
TROXLER NUMBER:65824 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROB
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
L3 T-C 1 6 121.9 115.4 5.7 99.4
L4 T-L 1 6 119.6 110.2 8.6 95.0
COMMENTS:
ATTACH PICTURE:
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 07/25/2016 11 :38 AM
Jones St DesMille
engineering
Jones & DeMille
16 East 200 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:7/26/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:2466
REPORT NUMBER:024 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:676
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Riley Vane MATERIAL:Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Cell Reclamation SOURCE:W5
PROJECT NUMBER:1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
116.1
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%): 13.0
TROXLER NUMBER:65824 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROB
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
L5 Center Right 1 8 117.8 110.9 6.2 95.5
L6 Bottom
Center
1 8 120.5 111.4 8.2 96.0
L7 Bottom Left 1 8 124.9 116.0 7.7 99.9
K8 Top Right 1 8 120.3 110.7 8.7 95.4
K9 Center Right 1 6 122.0 112.3 8.6 96.7
K10 Center Center 1 8 114.5 107.1 6.9 *95.6
K11 Bottom
Center
1 6 118.6 112.1 5.8 96.6
K12 Bottom Right 1 8 119.9 112.9 6.2 97.2
J13 Top Center 1 8 120.7 110.8 8.9 95.5
COMMENTS
Test #6 failed at 94.0%. Material opened up and re-compacted. Will retest tomorrow.
’Retested 7/27/16 in several locations within the K10 grid. All failed. Used proctor from M16-S-056 at 112.5 pcf. Passed.
ATTACH PICTURE:
I ■ ■ I
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 07/27/2016 04 :56 PM
Jones St DeMi//e
Engineer/n g
“V « ...........................
Jones & DeMille
16 East 300 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:7/27/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:2474
REPORT NUMBER:025 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:675
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Riley Vane MATERIAL: Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Cell Reclamation SOURCE:W5
PROJECT NUMBER:1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
112.5
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):14.5
TROXLER NUMBER: 65824 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROB
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
J14 Center Center 1 6 122.8 111.9 9.7 99.47
J15 Center Left 1 6 117.2 108.5 8.0 96.44
116 Top Left 1 8 122.9 110.3 11.5 98.04
117 Top Left 1 6 118.0 109.3 8.0 97.16
118 Top Left 1 8 121.8 112.8 8.0 100.27
119 Center Left 1 8 120.5 110.2 9.3 97.96
120 Center Left 1 8 115.7 108.3 6.9 96.27
J20 Bottom
Center
1 8 119.0 109.4 8.7 97.24
J19 Center Center 1 8 118.7 110.3 7.6 98.04
J18 Top Center 1 8 114.1 108.8 4.9 96.71
COMMENTS
Majority of densities failed. Most likely using the incorrect proctor for the material. This was evidenced by a visual change in the material (see
attached images), as well as no pumping or excessive deflection of material. Waiting for proctor sampled on 5/26/16. Will rework test with
correct proctor. Ran a new proctor for sample M16-S-063. Reworked data with a 112.5 proctor.
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 3 Printed On: 08/01/2016 11:13 AM
Jones S DeM i lie
Engineering
Jones & DeMille Page 2 of 3 Printed On: 08/01/2016 11 :13 AM
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 3 of 3 Printed On: 08/01/2016 11 :13 AM
Jones & DeMille
Engineering
Jones & DeMille
16 East 300 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:7/28/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:
REPORT NUMBER:026 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Riley Vane MATERIAL: Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Cell Reclamation SOURCE: W5
PROJECT NUMBER: 1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE 116.1
DENSITY (PCF):
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%): 13.0
TROXLER NUMBER: 65824 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%): 95.0
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROB
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
J10 Center Left 1 8 123.1 113.1 8.9 100.53
J9 Center Right 1 8 113.8 106.6 6.7 94.76
J8 Center Left 1 8 115.4 107.0 7.9 95.11
J7 Top Right 1 8 121.8 111.5 9.2 99.11
K6 Bottom Left 1 8 114.1 107.3 6.3 95.38
K5 Bottom Left 1 8 118.1 110.1 7.2 97.87
K4 Top Left 1 8 125.3 115.2 8.7 102 4
K3 Top Left 1 8 118.6 108.4 9.4 96.36
COMMENTS:
Material placed 7/27/16. Material transitioned to white and chalky material, different from previous material deposited. Ran a new proctor for
sample M16-S-063. Reworked data with a 112.5 proctor.
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 08/01/2016 11 :21 AM
Jones & De M file
Engineering
Jones & DeMille
16 East 300 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:7/29/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:2457
REPORT NUMBER:028 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:680
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Justin Baker MATERIAL: Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Cell Reclamation SOURCE: W5
PROJECT NUMBER: 1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
112.5
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):14.5
TROXLER NUMBER: 65824 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0%
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROS
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
111 TL 1 8 122.2 113.2 7.9 100.6
113 BL 1 8 116.4 108.3 7.5 96.3
115 BL 1 8 116.4 109.3 6.5 97.2
115 BR 1 8 122.2 110.8 7.9 98.5
H16 TR 1 8 115.0 107.1 7.3 95.3
H17 BR 1 8 119.0 109.0 9.2 96.9
COMMENTS:
Material placed on 7/28//16.
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 08/01/2016 04 :36 PM
\Jones 8* DeMille
Engineering
Jones & DeMille
16 East 300 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:7/29/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:2457
REPORT NUMBER:027 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:680
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Justin Baker MATERIAL: Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Cell Reclamation SOURCE:W5
PROJECT NUMBER: 1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
116.1
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%): 13.0
TROXLER NUMBER:65824 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0%
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROB
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
114 Middle 1 6 121.3 112.4 7.9 96.8
113 TL 1 8 112.8 113.2 8.8 96.4
COMMENTS:
Material placed on 7/28/16.
ATTACH PICTURE:
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 08/01/2016 04 :37 PM
Jones S DeMille
Engineering
Jones & DeMille
16 East 300 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:7/28/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:
REPORT NUMBER:026 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:
TECHNICIAN'S NAME: Riley Vane MATERIAL: Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Cell Reclamation SOURCE: W5
PROJECT NUMBER: 1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE 112.5
DENSITY (PCF):
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%): 14.5
TROXLER NUMBER:65824 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%): 95.0
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROB
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
J10 Center Left 1 8 123.1 113.1 8.9 100.53
J9 Center Right 1 8 112.3 106.8 5.1 *95.0
J8 Center Left 1 8 115.4 107.0 7.9 95.11
J7 Top Right 1 8 121.8 111.5 9.2 99.11
K6 Bottom Left 1 8 114.1 107.3 6.3 95.38
K5 Bottom Left 1 8 118.1 110.1 7.2 97.87
K4 Top Left 1 8 125.3 115.2 8.7 102.4
K3 Top Left 1 8 118.6 108.4 9.4 96.36
COMMENTS:
Material placed 7/27/16. Material transitioned to white and chalky material, different from previous material deposited. Ran a new proctor for
sample M16-S-063. Reworked data with a 112.5 proctor.
'Test #2 failed even after rework. Retested material on 8/2/16 with the same 112.5 proctor. Data reflects retest.
ATTACH PICTURE:
I ........ ■ I
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 08/02/2016 03 :55 PM
Jones S DeMille
Engineering
Jones & DeMille
16 East 300 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:8/1/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:2444
REPORT NUMBER:029 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:676
TECHNICIAN'S NAME: Riley Vane MATERIAL: Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Cell Reclamation SOURCE:W5
PROJECT NUMBER: 1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
112.5
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):14.5
TROXLER NUMBER:65824 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0
TEST STATION OFFSET /LIFT DEPTH DENSITY DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
G20 Bottom Left 1 6 115.1 107.6 7.0 95.6
H20 Top Left 1 8 115.1 106.8 7.7 95.0
120 Bottom Right 1 8 121.6 112.6 8.0 100.1
02 Top Left 2 8 113.6 107.5 5.7 95.5
03 Top Left 2 8 118.6 110.9 6.9 98.6
04 Top Left 2 8 116.4 107.6 8.2 95.6
05 Center Top 2 8 121.4 112.7 7.7 100.2
COMMENTS:
Material placed 7/29/16. Continued to have a large portion of material containing the white chalky soil. It is expected to see this material until
the W5 Radon Barrier stockpile is exhausted.
ATTACH PICTURE:
I , , ___ -■ I
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 08/01/2016 04 :06 PM
Jones 8k DeMille
Engineering
Jones & DeMille
16 East 300 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:8/2/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:2458
REPORT NUMBER:030 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=: 679
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Riley Vane MATERIAL:Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Cell Reclamation SOURCE:W5
PROJECT NUMBER:1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
112.5
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):14.5
TROXLER NUMBER:65824 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROB
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
06 Top Left 2 8 123.4 110.4 11.8 98.1
07 Center Center 2 8 118.6 107.5 10.3 95.5
08 Center Right 2 8 121.4 108.9 11.5 96.8
O10 Center Left 2 8 118.0 107.4 9.9 95.5
011 Top Right 2 8 126.8 115.5 9.8 *99.48
012 Top Center 2 8 126.6 114.5 10.5 *98.62
014 Center Center 2 8 115.0 107.9 6.6 95.9
015 Center Right 2 8 117.2 108.1 8.5 96.1
COMMENTS
Material placed 8/1/16.
"Tests #5 and #6 coincided with 116.1 pcf proctor. Material visibly redder than the the other chalkier 112.5 pcf proctor.
ATTACH PICTURE:
I ......... ............ I
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 08/08/2016 11:33 AM
Jones & DeM ille
Engineering
Jones & DeMille
16 East 300 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:8/2/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=: 2458
REPORT NUMBER:031 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:679
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Riley Vane MATERIAL:Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Cell Reclamation SOURCE: W5
PROJECT NUMBER: 1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
112.5
ENGINEER: OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):14.5
TROXLER NUMBER: 65824 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROB
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
017 Top Left 2 8 112.9 107.7 4.8 95.5
018 Top Center 2 8 119.2 110.2 8.2 97.9
019 Center Right 2 8 118.4 109.4 8.2 97.2
COMMENTS:
Material placed AM of 8/2/16.
ATTACH PICTURE:
L
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 08/02/2016 04 :26 PM
Jones St DeMille
Engineering
Jones & DeMille
16 East 300 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:8/3/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:2488
REPORT NUMBER:032 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:675
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Riley Vane MATERIAL: Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Cell Reclamation SOURCE: W5
PROJECT NUMBER:1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
112.5
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):14.5
TROXLER NUMBER:65824 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROS
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
021 Top Left 2 8 127.5 114.0 7.5 101.3
022 Center Center 2 8 119.7 111.7 7.1 99.3
023 Center Left 2 8 118.2 108.3 9.1 96.3
N2 Top Right 2 8 116.8 109.3 6.9 97.1
N4 Center Left 2 8 127.5 118.3 7.7 *101.9
N5 Top Left 2 8 120.1 108.8 10.3 96.7
N7 Center Left 2 8 119.7 111.2 7.6 98.9
COMMENTS
Placed 8/2/16.
’Test #5 coincided with 116.1 pcf proctor. Material visibly redder than the the other chalkier 112.5 pcf proctor.
ATTACH PICTURE:
i _________________________________________________________________________________ l
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 08/08/2016 11:35 AM
Jones St DeMille
Engineering
Jones & DeMille
16 East 300 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:8/9/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:2435
REPORT NUMBER:033 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:683
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Riley Vane MATERIAL:Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Cell Reclamation SOURCE: W3
PROJECT NUMBER:1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
117.5
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):11.7
TROXLER NUMBER:65824 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROB
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
02 Center Center 3 8 130.4 117.3 11.1 99.9
03 Center Right 3 8 129.5 118.1 9.7 100.5
05 Center Left 3 8 133.0 122.2 8.9 *97.5
COMMENTS:
Material placed 8/4/16. Due to rain, material has been unable to test until today. New stockpile corresponds with proctor sample M16-S-079.
'Material corresponds with sample 16-S-226 at 125.3 pcf.
ATTACH PICTURE:
L
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 08/09/2016 04 :14 PM
Jones St De MiIle
Engineering
Jones & DeMille
16 East 300 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:8/9/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:2435
REPORT NUMBER:034 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=: 683
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Riley Vane MATERIAL:Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Cell Reclamation SOURCE:W3
PROJECT NUMBER:1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
117.5
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):11.7
TROXLER NUMBER: 65824 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROB
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
06 Bottom Right 3 8 125.1 115.5 8.3 98.3
07 Center Right 3 8 126.8 117.0 8.3 99.6
09 Center Center 3 8 123.1 113.1 8.9 96.2
O10 Bottom Right 3 8 120.9 112.2 7.8 95.5
012 Bottom
Center
3 8 121.9 114.0 6.9 97.0
013 Center Right 3 8 121.8 113.2 7.6 96.4
014 Center Center 3 8 119.2 112.1 6.3 95.4
016 Center Left 3 8 122.6 114.3 7.3 97.3
017 Bottom
Center
3 8 121.7 111.9 8.7 95.3
COMMENTS:
Material placed 8/8/16.
ATTACH PICTURE:
I ___________________________________I
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 08/10/2016 07 :49 AM
Jones S DeMills
Engineering
Jones & DeMille
16 East 300 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:8/9/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:2435
REPORT NUMBER:035 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:683
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Riley Vane MATERIAL: Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Cell Reclamation SOURCE:W3
PROJECT NUMBER:1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
117.5
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):11.7
TROXLER NUMBER:65824 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROB
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
018 Bottom Right 3 8 122.8 113.2 8.5 96.4
019 Center Center 3 8 121.6 111.8 8.8 95.1
021 Center Center 3 8 120.9 112.5 7.5 95.7
COMMENTS
Material placed AM of 8/9/16.
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 08/10/2016 07 :54 AM
Jones St De M file
Engineering
Jones & DeMille
16 East 300 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:8/10/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:2446
REPORT NUMBER:036 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:673
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Justin Baker MATERIAL: Radon Barrier
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Mill Reclamation SOURCE: W3
PROJECT NUMBER:1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
115.4
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):11.2
TROXLER NUMBER:65824 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROB
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
024 Bottom Left 3 6 120.8 112.1 7.8 *97.2
022 Bottom Right 3 8 118.6 111.7 6.2 *96.8
COMMENTS:
* Tests corresponds with the 115.4 proctor taken from the W3 stockpile sample M16-S-051 and were placed 8/9/16
ATTACH PICTURE:
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 08/10/2016 03 :17 PM
Jones St De Mille
Engineering
Jones & DeMille
16 East 300 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:8/10/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:2446
REPORT NUMBER:037 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=: 673
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Justin Baker MATERIAL: Radon Barrier
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Mill Reclamation SOURCE: W5
PROJECT NUMBER:1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
112.5
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):14.5
TROXLER NUMBER:65824 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0
TEST STATION OFFSET /LIFT DEPTH DENSITY DENSITY
% MOISTURE % COMPACTION
N17 Middle 2 8 116.5 108.1 7.8 96.1
N18 Middle 2 8 116.9 108.2 8.0 96.1
N19 Middle Right 2 8 124.2 111.8 11.1 99.3
N21 Middle Left 2 8 128.3 115.2 11.4 101.4
N21 Middle Right 2 8 126.3 112.7 12.1 100.2
N16 Top Left 2 8 131.5 118.8 10.7 *97.7
COMMENTS:
Test #6 corresponds with the 116.1 proctor
ATTACH PICTURE:
I__________________________________________________________I
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 08/10/2016 03 :26 PM
Jones 8k DeMfile
Engineering
Jones & DeMille
16 East 300 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:8/11/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:2456
REPORT NUMBER:038 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:673
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Justin Baker MATERIAL:Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Mill Reclamation SOURCE: W5
PROJECT NUMBER: 1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
112.5
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):14.5
TROXLER NUMBER:65824 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROB
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
N23 Bottom Right 2 8 120 0 111.3 7.8 989
M17 Top Right 2 8 119.2 109.6 8.7 97.5
Ml 8 Middle 2 6 116.6 107.8 8.1 95.8
M19 Middle 2 6 114.2 106.8 6.8 95.0
COMMENTS:
L
ATTACH PICTURE:
L
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 08/11/2016 02:37 PM
Jones & DeMille
16 East 300 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:8/12/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:2491
REPORT NUMBER:039 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=: 676
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Justin Baker MATERIAL:Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Mill Reclamation SOURCE:W5
PROJECT NUMBER: 1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
112.5
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%): 14.5
TROXLER NUMBER: 65824 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROB
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
M23 Middle Left 2 8 117.5 109.3 7.5 97.2
M21 Top Right 2 8 116.4 107.9 7.9 95.9
M20 Top Right 2 8 115.9 107.6 7.7 95.6
N3 Top Left 2 8 120.5 111.5 8.0 99.1
N4 Bottom Left 2 8 116.1 108.7 6.8 96.6
M5 Top Right 2 8 116.8 107.6 8.6 95.6
M6 Top Right 2 8 124.3 115.0 8.1 102.2
M8 Middle Left 2 8 118.5 109.6 8.1 97.4
M9 Bottom Left 2 8 123.8 113.7 8.8 101.1
N10 Bottom Right 2 8 124.0 114.7 8.1 102.0
COMMENTS:
ATTACH PICTURE:
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 08/12/2016 04 :13 PM
Jones & De Mille
Engineering
Jones & DeMille
16 East 300 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:8/12/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:2491
REPORT NUMBER:040 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:676
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Justin Baker MATERIAL:Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Mill Reclamation SOURCE: W5
PROJECT NUMBER:1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
112.5
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):14.5
TROXLER NUMBER:65824 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROS
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
M11 Bottom Left 2 8 117.7 110.3 6.7 98.0
M12 Top Right 2 8 122.3 115.3 6.7 102.5
COMMENTS:
L
ATTACH PICTURE:
I ___J
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 08/12/2016 04 :11 PM
Jones & DeMille
Engineering
Jones & DeMille
16 East 300 South
Monticello. Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:8/15/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:672
REPORT NUMBER:041 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:2527
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Riley Vane MATERIAL: Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Cell Reclamation SOURCE:W5
PROJECT NUMBER:1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
112.5
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):14.5
TROXLER NUMBER:65824 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%): 95.0
TEST RESULTS:
OFFSET /LIFT DEPTH DENSITY DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
L22 Center Right 2 8 117 2 108.8 7.7 96.7
L21 Center Right 2 8 122.0 113.2 7.7 100.7
L20 Top Left 2 8 1192 111.5 6.9 99.2
M18 Bottom Right 2 8 118.6 110.2 7.6 97.9
L17 Top Right 2 8 114.1 107.4 6.2 95.5
M16 Bottom
Center
2 8 116.6 109.5 6.5 97.3
M15 Center Right 2 8 117.9 110.6 6.6 98.3
M13 Center Right 2 8 121.7 113.9 6.9 101.3
COMMENTS:
Material placed on 8/12/16.
ATTACH PICTURE:
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 08/15/2016 03 :39 PM
Jones & Do M ille
Engineering
Jones & DeMille
16 East 300 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:8/16/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:2461
REPORT NUMBER:042 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=: 668
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Riley Vane MATERIAL. Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Cell Reclamation SOURCE:W5
PROJECT NUMBER:1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
112.5
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):14.5
TROXLER NUMBER:65824 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROS
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
K22 Bottom Center 2 8 116.5 108.3 7.9 96.3
K21 Bottom Left 2 8 119.8 110.6 8.4 98.3
K20 Bottom
Center
2 8 117.4 109.9 6.8 97.7
K18 Center Right 2 8 119.2 109.4 8.9 97.3
K17 Center Center 2 8 117.0 107.9 8.4 95.9
L16 Bottom
Center
2 8 119.6 112.1 6.7 99.6
K15 Top Left 2 8 119.7 111.1 7.7 98.8
L14 Bottom Left 2 8 124.0 115.0 7.8 *99.05
COMMENTS:
Material placed on 7/15/16.
'Material corresponds to 116.1 pcf proctor
ATTACH PICTURE:
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 08/22/2016 05 :55 PM
Jo nos & Do M ille
Engineering
v •
Jones & DeMille
16 East 300 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:8/17/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=: 2527
REPORT NUMBER:043 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:680
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Justin Baker MATERIAL: Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Mill Reclamation SOURCE:W5
PROJECT NUMBER:1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
112.5
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):114.5
TROXLER NUMBER:65824 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROB
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
N2 Top Right 3 8 120.0 111.1 8.0 98.8
N3 Top Left 3 8 123.0 113.0 8.8 100.5
N4 Bottom Left 3 8 1233 111.5 10.6 99.1
N5 Bottom Middle 3 8 117.3 109.2 7.4 97.1
N5 Top Right 3 8 117.1 109.0 7.4 96.9
N6 Middel Right 3 8 119 0 110.0 8.3 97.8
N7 Middle Right 3 8 119.6 109.6 9.1 97.4
N8 Top Right 3 8 118.4 109.6 8.1 97.4
N10 Bottom Left 3 8 116.0 107.8 7.6 95.8
Nil Bottom Left 3 8 116.0 107.8 7.6 95.8
COMMENTS:
L
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 08/17/2016 01 :24 PM
Jones St DeMille
Engineering
Jones & DeMille
16 East 300 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:8/17/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:2527
REPORT NUMBER:044 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=: 680
TECHNICIAN’S NAME:Justin Baker MATERIAL: Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Mill Reclamation SOURCE: W5
PROJECT NUMBER: 1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
112.5
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):114.5
TROXLER NUMBER:65824 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0
TEST RESULTS
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROB
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
N12 Middle Left 3 8 115.7 107.4 7.8 95.4
COMMENTS:
L
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 08/17/2016 01 :26 PM
Jones & DoMille
Engineering
v «
Jones & DeMille
16 East 300 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:8/18/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:2509
REPORT NUMBER:045 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:682
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Justin Baker MATERIAL:Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Mill Reclamation SOURCE:W3
PROJECT NUMBER: 1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
115.4
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):11.2
TROXLER NUMBER:65824 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0
TEST RESULTS:
OFFSET /LIFT DEPTH DENSITY DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
N9 Middle Right 2 6 119.1 110.4 7.8 95.6
N10 Middle Right 2 6 119.5 110.6 8.1 95.8
N12 Middle 2 6 117.7 109.7 7.3 95.1
N13 Bottom Right 2 6 120.4 112.0 7.5 97.0
N14 Bottom Right 2 6 127.0 117.5 8.1 *100.0
COMMENTS:
We missed density tests for grids N9-N14 last week. The mill received enough rain for the job to be shut down on 8/4 mid way through the day
and all day Friday 8/5. We did not test the following Monday 8/8 as it was still very wet. During that time we missed the above mentioned
density tests. Today 8/18 we tested the missed 2nd lift by having the blade strike off 8-12" of material off of lift #3. Using the 115.4 proctor from
sample M16-S-051 on 7/13, all material tested met required compaction. Material was place on 8/3 for the second lift.
'Material corresponds with 117.5 Proctor
ATTACH PICTURE:
I .............- ... .. ■ ------ .. - I
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 08/18/2016 05 :16 PM
Jonos St DoMr'He
Engt'n eerincj
Jones & DeMille
16 East 300 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:8/18/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:2509
REPORT NUMBER:046 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:682
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Justin Baker MATERIAL:Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Mill Reclamation SOURCE:W3
PROJECT NUMBER:1606-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
112.6
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):13.0
TROXLER NUMBER:65824 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROB
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
N13 Bottom Right 3 8 122.2 114.1 7.1 101.3
N14 Bottom Right 3 8 117.9 110.1 7.0 97.8
N16 Bottom Left 3 8 120.3 110.9 8.5 98.5
N17 Middle 3 8 125.4 113.5 10.5 100.7
N18 Middle Right 3 8 120.4 112.0 7.6 99.5
N20 Middle Left 3 6 122.8 112.8 9.7 100.1
COMMENTS:
* Initial test with the 117.5 proctor was resulting in inconsistent compaction. Reworked with the new 112.6 proctor M16-S-081 for lift #3.
Material was placed 8/17
ATTACH PICTURE:
1 ......... ____ ______ ................- .................... I
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 08/18/2016 03 :48 PM
Jon os S DoM We
Engineering
v *
Jones & DeMille
16 East 300 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:8/19/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:2499
REPORT NUMBER:047 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:679
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Justin Baker MATERIAL: Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME White Mesa Mill Reclamation SOURCE:W3
PROJECT NUMBER: 1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
112.6
ENGINEER: OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):13.0
TROXLER NUMBER: 65824 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROS
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
N23 Middle 3 8 120.5 111.5 8.9 99.0
N22 Bottom Left 3 8 119.6 110.4 8.3 98.1
N21 Middle Left 3 8 121.4 111.4 9.0 98.9
M19 Middle Left 3 8 121.7 114.6 6.2 101.8
M20 Bottom Left 3 8 117.6 109.2 7.7 97.0
M21 Middle Left 3 8 125.9 115.2 9.3 *99.2
M22 Bottom Left 3 8 128.1 115.3 11.1 99.3
L23 Top Middle 3 8 117.0 108.8 7.5 96.7
COMMENTS:
Test #6 correlates with the the 116.1 proctor
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 08/19/2016 03 :22 PM
Jones & DeMiHe
Etigineering
Jones & DeMille
16 East 300 South
Monticello, Utah 84535
Phone:
Fax:
Project: 1604-086 - Energy Fuel Resources - White Mesa Mill Cell #2
Reclamation
San Juan County
Utah
Phone:
Fax:
DENSITY REPORT
NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY TEST DATA
DATE:8/19/2016 STANDARD COUNT N(D)=:2499
REPORT NUMBER:048 STANDARD COUNT N(M)=:679
TECHNICIAN'S NAME:Justin Baker MATERIAL:Radon Barrier 1
PROJECT NAME:White Mesa Mill Reclamation SOURCE:W1
PROJECT NUMBER: 1604-086 MAXIMUM OBTAINABLE
DENSITY (PCF):
111.6
ENGINEER:OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%):14.8
TROXLER NUMBER: 65824 COMPACTION REQUIRED (%):95.0
TEST RESULTS:
TEST STATION OFFSET REFERENCE
/LIFT
PROS
DEPTH
WET
DENSITY
DRY
DENSITY % MOISTURE % COMPACTION
L23 Top Middle 3 8 120.4 110.6 8.9 99.1
M8 Top Middle 3 8 117.3 109.2 7.4 97.9
M8 Bottom Right 3 8 116.3 107.8 7.9 96.6
M9 Top Right 3 8 114.7 107.1 7.1 96.0
L10 Bottom Left 3 8 114.6 106.8 7.3 95.7
Mil Middle 3 8 115.3 106.6 8.1 95.5
COMMENTS:
First densities for W1 material came out great with the 11.6 proctor (M16-S-098)
EMAIL REPORT:
Jones & DeMille Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 08/19/2016 03 :23 PM
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Curve No. 031
'u
CL
&
tncO)-DS’
Q
Preparation Method As received
Rammer: Wt 5.5 lb.Drop 12 in.
Type Pie Shaped Hammer
Layers: No. three Blows per 56
Mold Size 0.075 CU. ft.
Test Performed on Material
Passing 3/4 in.Sieve
%>3/4 in. 0.0 %<No.200 58.0
Atterberg (D 4318): LL PI
NM (D 2216)Sp.G. (D 854) 2.62
USCS (D 2487)
AASHTO (M 145)
Date: Sampled 6/30/16
Received 6/30/16
Tested 7/5/16 _
Tested By Micklane Farmer
COMPACTION TESTING DATA SIEVE TEST RESULTS
AASHTO T 99 Method D Standard _______________________________AASHTO T27 AASHTOT11
Opening Size % Passing Specs.
6"100.0 ~ 100.0
1"100.0
3/4"100.0
1/2"99.5
3/8"99.0
#4 97.7
#8 95.6
#16 93.7
#30 91.9
#50 88.8
#100 84.3
#200 58.0 10.0- 100.0
1 2 3 4 5 6
WM +WS 9377.7 ; 9720.1 9976.0 10113.9 10048.0
WM 5651.3 5651.3 5651.3 5651.3 5651.3
WW + T #1 914.5 901.4 1383.0 945.4 985.5
WD + T #1 883.2 860.8 1286.3 877.0 904.1
TARE #1 479.3 410.8 406.4 386.6 389.3
WW + T #2
WD + T #2 i________ ..
TARE #2
MOIST.7.7 9.0 11.0 13.9 15.8
DRY DENS.101.7 109.7 114.5 115.1 111.6
TEST RESULTS Material Description
Maximum dry density =115.7 pcf
Optimum moisture - 12.8 %
Radon Barrier
Remarks:
Project No. I604-086 Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Location: W6Sample Number: M16-S-031 Checked by: ________________________________________ Mark Rappleye
JONES & DEMILLE ENGINEERING INC. Title: Materials Manager
Richfield, Utah Figure
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Curve No. 033
Preparation Method As received
Rammer: Wt 5.5 lb.Drop 12 in.
Type Pie Shaped Hammer
Layers: No three Blows per 56
Mold Size 0.075 CU. ft.
Test Performed on Material
Passing 3/4 in.Sieve
%>3/4 in. 0.0 °o<No.200 55.1
A Herbert; (D 4318) LL PI
NM(D22l6)Sp.G. (D 854) 2.62
USCS (D 2487)
AASHTO (M 145)
Date: Sampled 7/1/16
Received 7/1/16
Tested 7/5/16
Tested By Mieklane Farmer
COMPACTION TESTING DATA SIEVE TEST RESULTS
AASHTO T 99 Method D Standard______________________ _________AASHTO T27 AASHTOT11
Opening Size % Passing Specs.
6"100.0 100.0
1"100.0
3/4"100.0
1/2" 98.8
3/8"97.7
#4 95.7
#8 93.5
#16 91.6
#30 90.0
#50 87.0
#100 81.1
#200 55.1 10.0- 100.0
1 2 3 4 5 6
WM +WS 9376.0 |p 3.1 10043.8 10149.1 10027.0
WM 5651.3 sesT1 5651.3 5651.3 5651.3
WW + T #1 , 970.5 ST.4.3 740 . 5 915.6 921.4 |
WD + T #1 929.1 S3.1..9 701.4 851.3 844.6
TARE #1
WW + T #2
WD + T #2
TARE #2
386.2 4Q6..4 384.7 387.7 407.6
MOIST.7.6 i 10.0 12.3 13.9 17.6
DRY DENS.101.7 111.2 114.9 116.1 109.4
TEST RESULTS Material Description
Maximum dry density = 1 16.1 pcf Radon Barrier
Optimum moisture - 13.9 %Remarks:
Project No. I604-086 Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Location: Stockpile l Sample Number: M16-S-033 Checked by: Mark Rappleye
JONES & DEMILLE ENGINEERING INC. Title: Materials Manager
______________________Richfield, Utah Figure
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Curve No. 034
Preparation Method As received
Rammer: Wt. 5.5 lb.Drop 12 in.
Type Pie Shaped Hammer
Layers: No. three Blows per 56
Mold Size 0.075 CU. ft.
Test Performed on Material
Passing 3/4 in.Sieve
%>3/4 in. 15.8 %<No.200 19.1
Atterberg (D 4318): LL PI
NM (D 2216)Sp.G. (D 8541 2.62
USCS (D 2487)
AASHTO (M 145)
Date: Sampled 7/5/16
Received 7/5/16
Tested 7/5/16
Tested By Micklane Farmer
COMPACTION TESTING DATA SIEVE TEST RESULTS
AASHTO T 99 Method D Standard _______________________________AASHTO T27 AASHTOT11
Opening Size % Passing Specs.
6"100.0 100.0
1"89.4
3/4"84.2
1/2"79.3
3/8"75.4
#4 65.0
#8 56.0
#16 49.6
#30 44.5
#50 37.4
#100 27.3
#200 19.1 10.0-100.0
1 2 3 4 5 6
WM + WS 9504.7 9696.4 9801.3 9857.4 9885.0
WM 5650.9 5650.9 5650.9 5650.9 5650.9
WW + T #1 837.9 872.5 879.4 822.4 903.8
WD + T #1 778 .8 801.3 801.2 746.8 811.4
TARE #1 414.9 390.9 389.9 388.8 407.4
WW + T #2
WD + T #2
TARE #2 I
MOIST.16.2 17.3 19.0 21.1 22.9
DRY DENS.97.5 101.3 102.5 102.1 101.3
TEST RESULTS Material Description
Maximum dry density = 102.5 pcf Radon Barrier - White Material
Optimum moisture - 18.6 %Remarks:
Project No. 1604-086 Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Location: W6 Sample Number: MI6-S-034 Checked by: Mark Rappleye
JONES & DEMILLE ENGINEERING INC. Title: Materials Manager
Richfield, Utah Figure
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Curve No. 039
Q.
2?
U)c(D•D
Q
Preparation Method As received
Rammer: Wt. 5.5 lb.Drop 12 in.
Type Pie Shaped Hammer
Layers. No three Blows per 56
Mold Size 0.075 CU. ft.
Test Performed on Material
Passing 3/4 in.Sieve
%>3/4 in. 16.3 %<No.200 40.1
Atterberg (D 4318): LL PI
NM (D 2216)Sp G (D 854) 2.62
USCS (D 2487)
AASHTO (M 145)
Date: Sampled 7/7/16
Received 7/7/16
Tested 7/7/16
Tested By Trent Sonderegger
COMPACTION TESTING DATA
AASHTO T 99 Method D Standard
1 2 3 4 5 6
WM +WS 9307.7 9670.3 9875.9 9986.5 10..029.'6 9921.3
WM 5651.7 5651.7 5651.7 5651.7 5651.7 5651.7
WW + T#1 748.8 865.0 894.7 907.0 825.2 834.3
WD + T #1 720.5 817.3 838.1 843.1 763.,5 767.7
TARE #1 388.5 387.3 389.3 388.2 3876.1 405.8
WW + T #2 _T . |WD + T #2
TARE #2
MOIST.8 . 5 11.1 12.6 14 . 0 16.4 18.4
DRY DENS.99.0 i 106.3 110.3 111 .7 110.6 106.0
SIEVE TEST RESULTS
AASHTO T27 AASHTO T11
Opening Size
6"
#200
% Passing Specs.
100.0 100.0
40.1 10.0-100.0
TEST RESULTS Material Description
Maximum dry density =111.8 pcf Radon Barrier
Optimum moisture - 14.6 %Remarks:
Project No. 1604-086 Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: While Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Location: W6-1Sample Number: M16-S-039 Checked by: Mark Rappleye
JONES & DEM1LLE ENGINEERING INC. Title: Materials Manager
Richfield, Utah Figure
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Curve No. 037
0 Q-
U3
C01 ■D
Q
Preparation Method As received
Rammer: Wt. 5.5 lb.Drop 12 in.
Type Pie Shaped Hammer
Layers: No three Blows per 56
Mold Size 0.075 CU. ft.
Test Performed on Material
Passing 3/4 in.Sieve
%>3/4 in. 1.6 °o<No.200 50.0
Atterberg (D 4318): LL PI
NM(D 2216)Sp.G. (D 854) 2.62
USCS (D 2487)
AASHTO (M 145)
Date: Sampled 7/6/16
Received 7/6/16
Tested 7/6/16
Tested By Micklane Farmer
COMPACTION TESTING DATA SIEVE TEST RESULTS
AASHTO T 99 Method D Standard______________________ _________AASHTO T27 AASHTOT11
Opening Size % Passing Specs.
6"100.0 100.0
r 100.0
3/4"98.4
1/2"98.1
3/8"96.5
#4 93.2
#8 89.7
#16 87.0
#30 84.4
#50 79.4
#100 71.4
#200 50.0 10.0- 100.0
1 2 3 4 5 6
WM +WS 9352.9 9656.1 9862.3 10022.7 : 9992.0
WM 5650.5 565D.5 5650.5 5650.5 ! 5650.5
WW + T #1 784.3 860.6 962.3 821.5 ; 990.0
WD + T #1 | 759.5 820.4 898.3 766.0 914.4
TARE #1 f-406.7 386.5 414.7 384.1 478.8
WW + T #2
WD + T #2
TARE #2
MOIST.7.0 9.3 13.2 14.5 17.4
DRY DENS.101.7 107.8 109.3 112.2 108.7
TEST RESULTS Material Description
Maximum dry density = 112.6 pcf Radon Barrier
Optimum moisture =15.1 %Remarks:
Project No. 1604-086 Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Location: W6-3 Sample Number: MI6-S-037 Checked by: Mark Rappleye
JONES & DEMILLE ENGINEERING INC. Title: Materials Manager
_____________________Richfield, Utah Figure
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Curve No. 059
t3
Q.
(ftcaj■d
Q
Preparation Method _As received____
Rammer: Wt 10 lb. Drop __ 18 in.
Type Pie Shaped Hammer
Layers: No. _____five _ Blows per 56
Mold Size ___ 0.075 CU. ft.__
Test Performed on Material
Passing 3/4 in. Sieve
%>3/4 in. 13.7 %<No.200 49.7
Atterberg (D 4318): LL
NM (D 2216)
USCS (D 2487)
AASHTO (M 145)
Date: Sampled
Received
Tested
PI _____
Sp.G. (D 854) 2.62
7/21/16
7/21/16
7/21/16
Tested By Trent Sonderegger
COMPACTION TESTING DATA
AASHTO T 180 Method D Modified
1 2 3 4 5 6
WM +WS 9638.7 9872.7 10015.5 10112.7 10045.5
WM 5647.9 5647.9 5647.9 5647.9 5647.9
WW + T #1 968.9 902.3 953.4 933.3 981.0
WD + T #1 924.8 859.2 902.3 876.8 910.3
TARE #1 1 386.9 388.5 389.4 411.0 ' 407.0
WW + T #2
WD + T #2
TARE #2 1
MOIST.8.2 9.2 10.0 12.1 14.0
DRV DENS.108.4 113.8 116.8 117.0 113.3
SIEVE TEST RESULTS
AASHTO T27 AASHTO T11
Opening Size % Passing Specs.
6"100.0 100.0
#200 49.7 10.0- 100.0
TEST RESULTS Material Description
Maximum dry density = 118.0 pcf Radon Barrier
Optimum moisture = 11.0 %
Project No. 1604-086 Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Remarks:
Location: W5_______Sample Number: M16-S-059_______________
JONES & DEMILLE ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Checked by: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
Figure
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Curve No. 063
Preparation Method _ ___As received__
Rammer: Wt. ____5^5 lb. Drop 12 in.
Type _ Pie Shaped Hammer
Layers: No. three Blows per
Mold Size 0.075 CU. ft.
56
Test Performed on Material
Passing 3/4 in.Sieve
%>3/4 in. 14.6 %<No.200 46.6
Atterberg (D 4318): LL PI
NM (D 2216)Sp.G. (D 854)2.62
USCS (D 2487)
AASHTO (M 145)
Date: Sampled 7/26/16
Received 7/26/16
Tested 7/26/16
Tested By Trent Sonderegger
COMPACTION TESTING DATA
AASHTO T 99 Method D Standard
1 2 3 4 5 6
WM +WS 9728.0 10024.0 10021.8 9917.3
WM 5648.5 5648.5 5648.5 5648.5
WW + T#1 920.1 984.5 817.S 998.2
WD + T #1 866.0 912.4 ' 756.5 905.6
TARE #1 387.2 410.7 388.4 406.2
WW + T #2
WD + T #2
TARE #2
MOIST.11.3 14.4 16.6 18.5
DRY DENS.107.7 112.5 110.3 105.9
SIEVE TEST RESULTS
AASHTO T27 AASHTO T11
Opening Size % Passing Specs.
6"100.0 100.0
#200 46.6 10.0- 100.0
TEST RESULTS Material Description
Maximum dry density = 112.5 pcf Radon Barrier
Optimum moisture = 14.5 %
Project No. 1604-086 Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Remarks:
Location: W5 Sample Number: M16-S-063_______________
JONES & DEMILLE ENGINEERING INC.
Checked by: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
Wtrtfiiiii Utah Figure
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Curve No. 166
oQ.
■&-
CO
ctu•a
Q
Preparation Method As received
Rammer: Wt. 5.5 lb. Drop 12 in.
Type Pie Shaped Hammer
Layers: No. three Blows per 56
Mold Size 0.075 CU. tt.
Test Performed on Material
Passing 3/4 in. Sieve
%>3/4 in 14.3
Atterberg (D 43 18) LL
NM (D 2216)
USCS (D 2487)
AAS1ITO (M 145)
%<No 200 47.4
PI
Sp.G (D 854) 2.62
7/27/16
7/27/16
7/27/16
Date Sampled
Received
Tested
Tested By Trent Sonderegger
COMPACTION TESTING DATA
AASHTO T 99 Method D Standard
1 2 3 4 5 6
WM +WS 9596.7 9874.6 9911.9 10017.7 9969.4
WM 5647.9 5647.9 5647.9 5647.9 5647.9
WW + T #1 955.2 984.3 975.5 990.9 849.0
WD + T#1 899.3 920.8 910.5 913.9 783.9
TARE #1
WW + T #2
WD + T#2
TARE #2
388.3 410.6 406.3 414 .1 389.5
MOIST.10.9 ; 12.4 ; 12.9 1 15.4 16.5
DRY DENS.104.6 110.5 111 . 0 111.3 109.0
SIEVE TEST RESULTS
AASHTO T27 AASHTO T11
Opening Size
6"
#200
% Passing Specs.
100.0 100.0
47.4 10.0-100.0
TEST RESULTS Material Description
Maximum dry density =111.9 pcf Radon Barrier
Optimum moisture - 14.4 %Remarks:
Project No. 1604-086 Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Location: W5 Sample Number: M16-S-066 Checked by: Mark Rappleye
JONES & DEMILLE ENGINEERING INC. Title: Materials Manager
______________________Richfield, Utah Figure
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Curve No. 072
ti
Q.
tnc0■O
Q
Preparation Method As received
Rammer Wt. 5.5 1b. Drop 12 in.
Type Pie Shaped Hammer
Layers: No. three Blows per 56
Mold Size 0.075 CU. ft.
Test Performed on Material
Passing 3/4 in. Sieve
%>3/4 in. 12.5
Atterberg (D 4318): LL
NM (D 2216)
USCS (D 2487)
AASHTO (M 145)
%<No.200 54.0
PI
Sp Ci ID 8541 2.62
8/1/16
8/1/16
8/1/16
Date Sampled
Received
Tested
Tested By Trent Sonderegger
COMPACTION TESTING DATA
AASHTO T 99 Method D Standard
1 2 3 4 5 6
WM + WS 9618.0 9861.5 9995.7 9.3.01.. 6 9893.8
WM 5648.1 5648.1 5648.1 564 3.1,
4_ . -
5648.1
WW + T #1 809.1 814 . 8 i 880.7 | 862.8 , 906.3
WD + T #1 772.8 769.9 819.8 ! 798.9 831.8
TARE #1 389.1 386.3 386.3 387.1 406.9
WW + T #2
WD + T #2
TARE #2
MOIST.9.5 11.7 14.0 15.5 17.5
DRY DENS.106.6 110.9 ; ii2.i
j___________109.8 106.2
SIEVE TEST RESULTS
AASHTO T27 AASHTO T11
Opening Size % Passing Specs.
6 100.0 100.0
#200 54.0 10.0 -100.0
TEST RESULTS Material Description
Maximum dry density = 112.3 pcf Radon Barrier
Optimum moisture - 13.4 %Remarks:
Project No. 1604-086 Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Location: W5 Sample Number: M16-S-072 Checked by: Mark Rappleye
JONES & DEMILLE ENGINEERING INC. Title: Materials Manager
______________________Richfield, Utah Figure
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Curve No. 078
oQ.
C
CD-a
Q
Preparation Method As received
Rammer: Wt. 5.5 lb.Drop 12 in.
Type Pie Shaped FJammer
Layers: No three Blows per 56
Mold Size 0.075 CU. ft.
Test Performed on Material
Passing 3/4 in.Sieve
%>3/4 in. 13.8 %<No.200 49.3
Atterberg (D 4318):LL PI
NM (D 2216)Sp.G. (D 854) 2.62
USCS (D 2487)
AASHTO (M 145)
Date: Sampled 8/2/16
Received 8/2/16
Tested 8/2/16
Tested By Trent Sonderegger
COMPACTION TESTING DATA
1 2 3 4 5 6
WM + WS 9599.9 9907.9 10034.2 10023.0 9967.7
WM 5648.1 5648.1 5648.1 l 5648.1 5648.1
WW + T #1 847.7 951.1 1098.1 914.3 978.2
WD + T #1 808.8 890.7 1012.5 841.3 891.7
TARE #1 414.1 388.2 410.8 387.5 405.5
WW + T #2
WD + T #2
TARE #2
MOIST.9.9 12.0 14.2 16.1 17.8
DRY DENS.105.7 111.8 112.9 110.8 107.8
SIEVE TEST RESULTS
AASHTOT27 AASHTOT11
Opening Size % Passing Specs.
6"100.0 100.0
#200 49.3 10.0-100.0
TEST RESULTS Material Description
Maximum dry density = 113.1 pcf
Optimum moisture = 13.6 %
Radon Barrier
Remarks:
Project No. 1604-086 Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Location: W5 Sample Number: M16-S-078 Checked by: Mark Rappleye
JONES & DEMILLE ENGINEERING INC. Title: Materials Manager
.Richfield,JUtah Figure
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Curve No. 079
t3
Q.
2?
c0)-O
£-
Q
Preparation Method As received
Rammer: Wt 5.5 lb.Drop 12 in.
Type Pie Shaped Hammer
Layers: No three Blows per 56
Mold Size 0.075 CU. ft.
Test Performed on Material
Passing 3/4 in.Sieve
%>3/4 in. 13.0 %<No 200 52.5
Atterberg (D 4318): LL PI
NM (D 2216)Sp.G. (D 854 ) 2.62
USCS (D 2487)
AASHTO (M 145)
Date Sampled 8/3 16
Received 8/3/16
Tested 8/3/16
Tested By Trent Sonderegger
COMPACTION TESTING DATA
AASHTO T 99 Method D Standard
1 2 3 4 5 6
WM + WS 9632.5 9915.8 10083.8 10095.7 10017.0
WM 5648.1 5648.1 5648.1 5648.1 5648 . 1
WW + T#1 881. 8 873.3 809.0 964.6 901.7
WD + T #1 843.7 828.8 766.0 898.1 834.3
TARE #1
WW + T #2
WD + T #2
TARE #2
405.6 389.7 383.2 388.0 386.5
MOIST.8.7 10.1 11.2 13.0 15.1
DRY DENS.107.8 113.9 117.2 115.7 111.6
SIEVE TEST RESULTS
AASHTO T27 AASHTO T11
Opening Size % Passing Specs.
6,r I00.0 100.0
#200 52.5 10.0-I00.0
TEST RESULTS Material Description
Maximum dry density = 1 17.5 pcf Radon Barrier
Optimum moisture - 1 1.7 %Remarks:
Project No. 1604-086 Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Location: W3 Sample Number: M16-S-79 Checked by: Mark Rappleye
JONES & DEMILLE ENGINEERING INC. Title: Materials Manager
______________________Richfield, Utah Figure
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Curve No. 081
oQ.
COc(U■O
Q
10 12.5 15 17.5 20 22.5 25
Water content, %
Preparation Method ____As received
Rammer: Wt. 5.5 lb. Drop 12 in.
Type Pie Shaped Hammer
Layers: No. three Blows per 56
Mold Size 0.075 CU. ft.
Test Performed on Material
Passing 3/4 in.Sieve
%>3/4 in. 0.0 %<No 200 67.6
Atterberg (D 4318): LL PI
NM (D 2216)Sp.G. (D 854)2.62
USCS (D 2487)
AASHTO (M 145)
Date: Sampled 8/9/16
Received 8/9/16
Tested 8/9/16
Tested ByTrent Sonderegger
COMPACTION TESTING DATA
AASHTO T 99 Me■thod D Standard
1 2 3 4 5 6
WM + WS 9907 .7 10010.3 9920.5 9810.9
WM 5647.9 5647.9 5647.9 5647.9
WW + T #1 858.2 846.6 852.7 840.2
WD + T #1 809.6 789.1 782.5 764.5
TARE #1 385.6 389.0 387.2 413.5
WW + T #2
WD + T #2
TARE #2
MOIST.11.5 14.4 17.8 21.6
DRY DENS.112.3 112.1 106.7 100.7
SIEVE TEST RESULTS
AASHTOT27 AASHTOT11
Opening Size % Passing Specs.
6"100.0 100.0
1"100.0
3/4"100.0
1/2"100.0
3/8"100.0
#4 99.9
#8 99.6
#16 99.4
#30 99.1
#50 98.6
#100 96.5
#200 67.6 10.0- 100.0
TEST RESULTS
Maximum dry density = 112.6 pcf
Optimum moisture = 13.0 %
Material Description
Radon Barrier
Remarks:
Project No. 1604-086 Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Location: W3 Sample Number: M16-S-081 Checked by: Mark Rappleye
JONES & DEMILLE ENGINEERING INC. Title: Materials Manager
M Richfield, Utah Figure
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Curve No. 081
Preparation Method As received
Rammer Wt. 5.5 lb.Drop 12 in.
Type Pie Shaped Hammer
Layers: No three Blows per 56
Mold Size 0.075 CU. ft.
Test Performed on Material
Passing 3/4 in.Sieve
%>3/4 in. 0.0 0,o<No 200 67.6
Atterberg (D 4318): LL PI
NM (D 2216)Sp G. (D 854) 2.62
USCS (D 2487)
AASHTO (M 145)
Date: Sampled 8/9/16
Received 8/9/16
Tested 8/9/16
Tested By Trent Sonderegger
COMPACTION TESTING DATA SIEVE TEST RESULTS
AASHTO T 99 Method D Standard _______________________________AASHTO T27 AASHTOT11
Opening Size % Passing Specs.
6"100.0 100.0
1"100.0
3/4"100.0
1/2" 100.0
3/8"100.0
#4 99.9
#8 99.6
#16 99.4
#30 99.1
#50 98.6
#100 96.5
#200 67.6 10.0- 100.0
1 2 3 4 5 6
WM +WS 9907.7 10010.3 ; 9920.5 9810.9
WM 5647.9 5647.9 : 5647.9 5647.9
WW + T #1 858.2 846.6 852.7 : 840.2
WD + T #1 809.6 1 789.1 782.5 764.5
TARE #1 385.6 389.0 387.2 413.5
WW + T #2
WD + T #2
TARE #2
MOIST.11.5 14.4 17.8 21.6
DRY DENS.112.3 112.1 106.7 100.7
TEST RESULTS Material Description
Maximum dry density = 112.6 pcf Radon Barrier
Optimum moisture - 1 3.0 %Remarks:
Project No. 1604-086 Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Location: W3 Sample Number: M16-S-08I Checked by: Mark Rappleye
JONES & DEMILLE ENGINEERING INC. Title: Materials Manager
______________________Richfield, Utah Figure
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Curve No. 084
Preparation Method As received
Rammer: Wt. 5.5 lb.Drop 12 in.
Type Pie Shaped Hammer
Layers: No. three Blows per 56
Mold Size 0.075 CU. ft.
Test Performed on Material
Passing 3/4 in.Sieve
%>3/4 in. 15.7 %<No.200 42.5
Atterberg (D 4318): LL PI
NM (D 2216)Sp.G. (D 854) 2.62
USCS (D 2487)
AASHTO (M 145)
Date: Sampled 8/10/16
Received 8/10/16
Tested 8/10/16
Tested By Trent Sonderegger
COMPACTION TESTING DATA
AASHTO T 99 Method D Standard
1 2 3 4 5 6
WM +WS 9635.6 9840.3 9980.2 9937.4 9840.9
WM 5648.0 5648.0 5648.0 5648.0 5648.0
WW + T #1 813.1 851.4 870.7 830.5 836.6
WD + T #1 770.5 799.4
^ 807.7
730.0 760.3
TARE #1 387.1 388.5 410.5 406.3 ! 405.8
WW + T #2
WD + T #2
TARE #2
MOIST.11.1 12.7 15.9 31.0 21.5
DRY DENS.105.5 109.4 109.9 96.2 101.4
SIEVE TEST RESULTS
AASHTOT27 AASHTOT11
Opening Size
6"
#200
% Passing 1 Specs.
100.0 100.0
42.5 10.0- 100.0
TEST RESULTS Material Description
Maximum dry density = 110.8 pcf
Optimum moisture = 14.3 %
Radon Barrier
Remarks:
Project No. 1604-086 Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Location: W5 Sample Number: M16-S-084 Checked by: ______________________________Mark Rappleye
JONES & DEMILLE ENGINEERING INC. Title: Materials Manager
Richfield, Utah Figure
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Curve No. 088
Preparation Method As received
Rammer Wt. 5.5 lb.Drop 12 in.
Type Pie Shaped Hammer
Layers: No three Blows per 56
Mold Size 0.075 CU. ft.
Test Performed on Material
Passing 3/4 in.Sieve
%>3/4 in 14.3 ° o<No 200 47.5
Atterberg (D 4318) LL PI
NM (D 3216)SpG (D 854)2.62
USCS (D 2487)
AASHTO (M 145)
Date: Sampled 8/11/16
Received 8/11/16
Tested 8/11/16
Tested By Trent Sonderegger
COMPACTION TESTING DATA
AASHTO T 99 Method D Standard
1 2 3 4 5 6
WM + WS 9697.7 9814.3 9992.7 10036.8 9901.8
WM 5647.6 5647.6 56:47.6 5647.6 5647.6
WW + T #1 853.4 893.6 943.6 966.1 874.8
WD + T #1 808.4 839.2 87 3,5 8 87.0 803.6
TARE #1
WW + T #2
WD + T #2
TARE #2
389.4 383.1 386,.5 388 .1 388.8
MOIST.10.7 11.9 14 . 4 15.9 17.2
DRY DENS.107.5 109.4 111 . 7 111.4 106.7
SIEVE TEST RESULTS
AASHTO T27 AASHTO Til
Opening Size
6"
#200
% Passing Specs.
100.0 100.0
47.5 10.0 -100.0
TEST RESULTS Material Description
Maximum dry density = 112.0 pcf Radon Barrier
Optimum moisture 15.1%Remarks:
Project No. 1604-086 Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Location: W5 Sample Number: M16-S-088 Checked by: Mark Rappleye
JONES & DEMILLE ENGINEERING INC. Title: Materials Manager
______________________Richfield, Utah Figure
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Curve No. 089
13
Q.
&
(/)d<D-a
£r
Q
Preparation Method As received
Rammer Wt. 5.5 lb. Drop 12 in.
T>pe Pie Shaped Hammer
Layers: No. three Blows per 56
Mold Size 0.075 CU. ft.
Test Performed on Material
Passing 3/4 in. Sieve
%>3/4 in 14.8
Atterberg (D 4318) LL
NM (D 2216)
uses (D 2487)
AASHTO (M 145)
%<No.200 45.8
PI
Sp.G (D 854) 2.62
8/12/16
8/12/16
8/12/16
Date Sampled
Received
Tested
Tested By Trent Sonderegger
COMPACTION TESTING DATA
AASHTO T 99 Method D Standard
1 2 3 4 5 6
WM +WS 9828.8 9942.0 9979.7 9890.1
WM 5648.5 5648.5 5648.5 5648.5
WW + T #1 955.9 865.5 864.5 907.0
WD + T #1 892.5 806.5 797.2 825.8
TARE #1 386.0 414.3 38 6.9 388.3
WW + T #2
WD + T #2
TARE #2
MOIST.
DRY DENS.
12.5
10 9.2
15.0
109.7
16.4
109.4
18.6
105.2
SIEVE TEST RESULTS
AASHTO T27 AASHTO T11
Opening Size % Passing Specs.
6" 100.0 100.0
#200 45.8 10.0- 100.0
TEST RESULTS Material Description
Maximum dry density = 109.7 pcf Radon Barrier
Optimum moisture = 1 5.5 %Remarks:
Project No. 1604-086 Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Location: W'5 Sample Number: M16-S-089 Checked by: Mark Rappleye
JONES & DEMILLE ENGINEERING INC. Title: Materials Manager
______________________Richfield, Utah Figure
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Curve No. 091
Preparation Method As received
Rammer Wt. 5.5 lb.Drop 12 in.
Type Fie Shaped Hammer
Layers No three Blows per 56
Mold Size 0.075 CU. ft.
Test Performed on Material
Passing 3/4 in.Sieve
%>3/4 in. 15.6 %<No200 42.7
Atterberg {D 4318): LL PI
NM (D 2216)Sp.G (D 854)2.62
USCS (D 2487)
AASHTO (M 145)
Date: Sampled 8 15 16
Received 8/15/16
Tested 8/15/16
Tested By Micklane Farmer
COMPACTION TESTING DATA
AASHTO T 99 Method D Standard
1 2 3 4 5 6
WM +WS 9749.1 9908,1 10019.7 9945.4
WM 5647.8 5647.8 5647.8 5647.8
WW + T #1 892.5 836.6 961.8 935.3
WD + T #1 ! 840.2 785.8 885.9 854.4
TARE #1 : 407.0 406.6 410.4 383.5
WW + T #2
WD + T #2
TARE #2
MOIST.12.1 13.4 16.0 17.2
DRY DENS.107.6 110.4 110.8 107.8
SIEVE TEST RESULTS
AASHTO T27 AASHTO T11
Opening Size
6"
#200
% Passing
100.0
42.7
Specs.
100.0
10.0- 100.0
TEST RESULTS Material Description
Maximum dry density = 111.8 pcf Radon Barrier
Optimum moisture = 14.8 %
Project No. 1604-086 Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Remarks:
Location: W5 Sample Number: M16-S-091_______________
JONES & DEMILLE ENGINEERING INC.
Checked by: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
Richfield, Utah Figure
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Curve No. 093
Preparation Method As received
Rammer: Wt 5.5 lb.Drop 12 in.
Type Pie Shaped Hammer
Layers: No three Blows per 56
Mold Size 0.075 CU. ft.
Test Performed on Material
Passing 3/4 in.Sie\e
%>3/4 in. 0.0 ,>a<No200 51.7
Atterberg (D 4318): LL PI
NM (D 2216)SpG (D 854) 2.62
USCS (D 2487)
AASHTO (M 145)
Date: Sampled 8/16/16
Received 8/16/16
Tested 8/16/16
Tested By Trent Sonderegger
COMPACTION TESTING DATA SIEVE TEST RESULTS
AASHTO T 99 Method D Standard______________________ _________AASHTO T27 AASHTOT11
1 2 3 4 5 6
WM +WS 9511.5 9707.0 99] 5.6 10031.4 9933.3
WM 5647.0 5647.0 5647.0 5647.0 5647.0
WW + T #1 930.6 919.3 646.6 8 6 9.6 933.9
WD + T #1 878.7 863.3 791.8 823.2 852.8
TARE #1
WW + T #2
WD + T #2
TARE #2
389.0 386.5 388.1 387.9 386.Q
MOIST.10.6 11.7 13.6 15.3 17.4
DRY DENS.102.7 106.8 110.5 111.8 107.3
Opening Size % Passing Specs.
6"100.0 100.0
1"100.0
3/4"100.0
1/2"98.5
3/8"97.7
U 94.5
n 91.3
#16 88.3
#30 85.7
#50 82.0
#100 77.5
#200 51.7 10.0- 100.0
TEST RESULTS Material Description
Maximum dry density = l I l .9 pcf
Optimum moisture = 15.0 %
Project No. 1604-086 Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Radon Barrier
Remarks:
Location: W5 Sample Number: M16-S-093_______________
JONES & DEMILLE ENGINEERING INC.
Checked by: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
Richfield, Utah Figure
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Curve No. 097
CL
&
U)c0)■O
Q
Preparation Method As received
Rammer: Wt. 5.5 lb. Drop 12 in.
Type Pie Shaped Hammer
Layers: No three Blows per 56
Mold Size 0.075 CD. ft.
Test Performed on Material
Passing 3/4 in.
%>3/4 in. 16.3
Atterberg (D 4318), LL
NM (D 2216)
USCS (D 2487)
AASHTO (M 145)
Date: Sampled
Received
Tested
Tested By
Sieve
%<No.200 40.1
PI
Sp.G. (D 854) 2.62
8/17/16
8/17/16
8/17/16
Trent Sonderegger
COMPACTION TESTING DATA
AASHTO T 99 Method D Standard
1 2 3 4 5 6
WM +WS 9549.7 9310.1 9973.7 10038.4 9955.0 9837.8
WM 5647.0 5647.0 5647.0 5647.0 5647.0 5647.0
WW + T #1 955.6 822.3 8 64.2 853.0 893.7 965.3
WD + T #1 904.6 777.4 810.0 7 92.3 816.3 866.9
TARE #1
WW + T #2
WD + T #2
TARE #2
388.3 386.9 414.0 406.8 383.9 406.1
MOIST.9.3 11.5 13.7 15.7 17.9 21.4
DRY DENS.104.4 : 109.8 111.9 111.5 107.4 101.5
SIEVE TEST RESULTS
AASHTO T27 AASHTO T11
Opening Size % Passing Specs.
6" 100.0 100.0
#200 40.1 10.0-100.0
TEST RESULTS Material Description
Maximum dry density = 112.1 pcf Radon Barrier
Optimum moisture - 14.6 %Remarks:
Project No. 1604-086 Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Location: W1 Sample Number: M16-S-097 Checked by: Mark Rappleye
JONES & DEMILLE ENGINEERING INC. Title: Materials Manager
______________________Richfield, Utah Figure
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Curve No. 098
'G
CL
-S’
U>c
Q
Preparation Method As received
Rammer: Wt 5.5 lb. Drop 12 ill.
Type Pie Shaped Hammer
Layers: No three Blows per 56
Mold Size 0.075 CU. ft.
Test Perfonned on Material
Passing 3/4 in.
%>3/4 in. 16.1
Atterberg (D 4318): LL
NM (D 2216)
USCS (D 2487)
AASHTO (M 145)
Sieve
“o' No.200 41.1
PI
Sp G (D 854) 2.62
8/17/16
8/17/16
8/17/16
Date: Sampled
Received
Tested
Tested By Trent Sonderegger
COMPACTION TESTING DATA
AASHTO T 99 Method D Standard
1 2 3 4 5 6
WM +WS 5462.7 9670.5 9965.9 10014.9 9866.6
WM 5647.0 5647.0 5647.0 5647.0 5647.0
WW + T #1 909.0 971.8 939.1 944 . 9 983.5
WD + T #1 868.1 910.7 870.6 867.9 890.2
TARE #1
WW + T #2
WD + T #2
TARE #2
410.4 383.9 336.5 387.4 388.1
MOIST.8.9 11.6 14.1 16.0 18.6
DRY DENS.103.0 106.0 111.2 110.7 104.6
SIEVE TEST RESULTS
AASHTO T27 AASHTO T11
Opening Size
6"
#200
% Passing Specs.
100.0 100.0
41.1 10.0-100.0
TEST RESULTS Material Description
Maximum dry density = 11 1.6 pcf Radon Barrier
Optimum moisture - 14.8 %Remarks:
Project No. 1604-086 Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Location: W1 Sample Number: M16-S-098 Checked by: Mark Rappleye
JONES & DEMILLE ENGINEERING INC. Title: Materials Manager
______________________Richfield, Utah Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
I
1 t
0.01 0.001
GRAIN SIZE - mm.
% +3"
0.0
% Gravel % Sand % Fines
12.6
Coarse
6.0
Fine
31.7
Silt Clay
49.7
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
6"100.0 100.0
I"100.0
3/4"99.1
1/2"96.8
3/8"95.0
#4 91.1
#8 88.1
#16 85.5
#30 83.1
#50 80.0
#100 74.5
#200 49.7 10.0- 100.0
Material Description
Radon Barrier
PL=
USCS (D 2487)=
D90= 3.7887
D50= 0.0755
D10=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
U_=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= l.0024
?30=
cu=
D60= 0.0957
?15=
Remarks
Date Received: 7/1/16 Date Tested:
Tested By: Micklane Farmer
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
7/5/16
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: Stockpile 1
Sample Number: M16-S-032
Date Sampled: 7/1/16
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
= £ ^ .E £ = coro ^ i! ^ S o o o04 n tj-
O O Oo o -a- oto T- CM% at at at
rv
While Mesa - Radon Barrier
100 10 0.01 0.001
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
% +3"
0.0
% Gravel
7.0
% Sand
Coarse Fine4.6 t 33.3
% Fines
Silt
55.1
Clay
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO Til)
Opening
Size
Percent
Finer
Spec.* Pass?
(Percent) (X=Fail)
6"100.0 100.0
1"100.0
3/4"100.0
1/2”98.8
3/8"97.7
#4 95.7
#8 93.5
#16 91.6
#30 90.0
#50 87.0
#100 81.1
#200 55.1 10.0- 100.0
Material Description
Radon Barrier
PL=
USCS (D 2487)=
Dgo= 0.6050
d50=
D10=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 0.1938 D60= 0.0837
d30= d15=
Cu= Cc=
Remarks
Date Received: 7/1/16 Date Tested: 7/5/16
Tested By: Micklane Farmer ______ ______
Checked By: Mark Rappleye _____
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: Stockpile 1
Sample Number: M16-S-033 Date Sampled: 7/1/16
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
100 10 0.1 0.01 0.001
GRAIN SIZE - mm.
% +3"
0.0
% Gravel
37.9
% Sand % Fines
Coarse
12.8
Fine
21.2
Silt Clay
28.1
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
6"100.0 100.0
1"100.0
3/4"100.0
1/2"97.1
3/8"91.3
#4 75.6
#8 64.1
#10 62.1
#16 56.4
#30 51.3
#40 49.3
#50 47.0
#100 41.1
#200
-------5-----------
28.1 10.0- 100.0
Material Description
Radon Barrier
PL=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
uses (D 2487)=
D9o= 9.0105
D50= 0.4795
D10=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 7.2661
D3o= 0.0820
Cu=
D60= 1.6624
?15=
Cc=
Remarks
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W6
Sample Number M^S-jSO
Date Received: 7/1/16 Date Tested: 7/5/16
Tested By: Micklane Farmer_____
Checked By: MarkRappleye
Title: Materials Manager
Date Sampled: 6/30/16
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 __________Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
o o o cm co
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
111
S 5 S
'k
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
100 10 0.1 0.01
GRAIN SIZE - mm.
% +3”
5.9
% Gravel
30.9
% Sand
Coarse
13.1
Fine
14.8
% Fines
SMt
35.3
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11) __
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
Material Description
Radon Barrier
6"
#200
100.0
35.3
100.0
10.0- 100.0
PL=
USCS (D 2487)=
D9o= 46.9359
D5o= 0.4223
D10=
AtterbergJJmits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 26.0474 D60= 1.3711
d30= d15=
Cu=Cc=
Remarks
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W6 - Stockpile 1
Sample Number: M16-S-040
0.001
Jday
Date Received: 7/7/16 Date Tested: 7/7/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye _________
Title: Materials Manager
Date Sampled: 7/7/16
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086_______Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
% +3"
0.0
% Gravel
10.3
% Sand
Coarse
10.9
Fine
31.1
% Fines
Silt
47.7
Clay
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)
Opening ] Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
Material Description
Radon Barrier
6"100.0
1"100.0
3/4"100.0
1/2"98.9
3/8"98.3
#4 95.4
#8 90.8
#16 86.3
#30 82.0
#50 75.6
#100 68.7
#200 47.7
100.0
PL=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
USCS (D 2487)=
D90= 2.0881
D50= 0.0801
D10=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 0.9415 D60= 0.1075
d30= d15=
Cu=Cc=
10.0- 100.0 Remarks
Date Received: 7/5/16 Date Tested: 7/5/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger ______
Checked By: Mark Rappleye_________
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W6-Pile#2
Sample Number: M16-S-035
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Date Sampled: 7/5/16
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
% +3"
~0.0
% Gravel
11.1
% Sand
Coarse Fine
6.9 32.0
% Fines
Silt
50.0
Clay
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO Til)
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
100.0
Material Description
Radon Barrier
6"100.0
1"100.0
3/4"98.4
1/2"98.1
3/8"96.5
#4 93.2
#8 89.7
#16 87.0
#30 84.4
#50 79.4
#100 71.4
#200 50.0
PL=
Atterbera Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
USCS (D 2487)=
Dg0= 2.5297
d50=
D10=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 0.6784 D60= 0.0999
d30= ?15=
Cu=Cc=
10.0- 100.0 Remarks
Date Received: 7/6/16 Date Tested: 7/6/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye________ __
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W6-3
Sample Number: M16-S-037
Date Sampled: 7/6/16
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086____________________Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
c c c ^ c .E
(Q CO CM T- ^ ^O O OCM COat at at
o o oO O' Oa— a- CMat at at
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
100 10 1
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
0.1 0.01 0.001
% +3"
5.4
% Gravel
28.2
% Sand_______
Coarse Fine
12.0 13.4
% Fines
Silt Clay
41.0
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHT0T11)__
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
6"
#200
100.0
41.0
100.0
10.0-100.0
Material Description
Radon Barrier
PL=
Atterberq Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
USCS (D 2487)=
D9o= 41.9357
D50= 0.2404
D10=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 21.9980
d30=
cu=
Remarks
D60= 0.8737
915=
Cc=
Date Received: 7/8/16 Date Tested: 7/8/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger ______ ________
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials_Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W6
Sample N umber: M16-S-041
Date Sampled: 7/8/16
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah _Project No: 1604-086
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
_Fiaure_
Particle Size Distribution Report
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
% +3"% Gravel % Sand % Fines
0.0 10.0
Coarse
6.7
Fine Silt Clay
33.4 49.9
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)
Opening Percent Spec.*Pass?
Size Finer (Percent)(X=Fail)
6"100.0 100.0
1"100.0
3/4"100.0
1/2"99.1
3/8"97.7
#4 94.1
#8 90.8
#16 88.1
#30 85.6
#50 80.8
#100 73.7
#200 49.9 10.0- 100.0
Material Description
Radon Barrier
PL=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= PI=T
USCS (D 2487)=
D90= 1.9839
D5o= 0.0752
D10=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 0.5430
D3o=
c,
D60= 0.0967
015=
■'IT Cc=
Remarks
Date Received: 7/6/16 Date Tested: 7/6/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W6-2
Sample Number: M16-S-036 Date Sampled: 7/6/16
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 __Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
100
90
80
70
crUJ
Z 60
Li.
Z 50
UJ
0
01 40
LUQ.
30
20
10
0
Location: W6 Date Sampled: 7/5/16Sample Number: MUMiMWWHWBWi
JONES & DEMILLE Client: Energy Fuel Resources
ENGINEERING INC.Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
■■fcichiflIC Utah Project No: 1604-086 Figure
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
6"100.0 100.0
1"89.4
3/4"84.2
1/2"79.3
3/8"75.4
#4 65.0
#8 56.0
#16 49.6
#30 44.5
#50 37.4
#100 27.3
#200 19.1 10.0- 100.0
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Material Description
Radon Barrier - White Material
PL=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
USCS (D 2487)=
D90= 27.9108
D50= 1.2440
D10=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 19.9772
D3o= 0.1806
Cu=
D60= 3.3028
915=
Cc=
Remarks
Date Received: 7/5/16 Date Tested: 7/5/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: MarkRappleye ________
Title: Materials Manager ________
4.1 I 41.7 12.7 i 22.4 19.1
Particle Size Distribution Report
■E s 5 I e
CO CM T- T- >> CO
o o oCM CO T
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
--4------------:
: i
o o oO oT- T- CN«:
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
100
% +3"
5.4
10
% Gravel
28.7
0.1
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
% Sand
Coarse Fine
12.1 13.7
0.01
% Fines
Silt
40.1
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHT0T11)
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
Material Description
Radon Barrier
PL=
Atterberg Umits (ASTM D 4318)
LL*= Pl=
USCS (D 2487)=
D9o= 42.6898
D50= 0.2628
D10=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 22.5940 D60= 0.9383
d30= ?15=
Cu=Cc=
Remarks
Date Received: 7/7/16 Date Tested: 7/7/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W6-1
Sample Number: M16-S-039 _
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
0.001
Clay
Date Sampled: 7/7/16
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 __________Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
o o o CN ro% %100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
I!
100 10
o o oo -sr o
I White Mesa - Radon Barrier
0.1 0.01
GRAIN SIZE - mm.
% +3"
4.9
% Gravel % Sand % Fines
25.8
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)
Opening Percent Spec.*Pass?
Size Finer (Percent)(X=Fail)
6"100.0 100.0
#200 46.1 10.0-100.0
Coarse
11.0
Radon Barrier
Fine Silt
12.2 46.1
Material Description
PL=
USCS (D 2487)=
D90= 37.1383
D50= 0.1310
D10=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 18.3333 D60= 0.5374
930= d15=
Cu=Cc=
Remarks
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W6
Sample Number: M16-S-042
0.001
Clay
Date Received: 7/8/16 Date Tested: 7/8/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye ________
Title: Materials Manager
Date Sampled: 7/8/16
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
100 10 1
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
0 01 0.001
% +3"
0.9
% Gravel
22.1
Coarse Fine
7.9 30.0
% Fines
Silt
39.1
Clay
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)
Opening Percent
Spec.*Pass?
Size Finer (Percent)(X=Fail)
6"100.0 100.0
1"94.3
3/4"92.1
1/2"89.4
3/8"87.3
#4 82.3
#8 77.9
#16 74.5
#30 71.5
#50 66.3
#100 58.0
#200 39.1 10.0- 100.0
Material Description
Radon Barrier
PL=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
uses (D 2487)=
D90= 13.8286
D50= 0.1077
D10=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 6.9973 D60= 0.1678
d30= ?15=
Cc=
Remarks
Date Received: 7/6/16 Date Tested: 7/6/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager_______________
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W6-1
Sample Number: M16-S-038
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC. ■■I Richfield, Utah
Date Sampled: 7/6/16
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 Figure
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Curve No. 051
Preparation Method
Rammer: Wt 5.5 lb.Drop 12 in.
Type
Layers: No. __three Blows per 56
Mold Size 0.075 CU. ft.
Test Performed on Material
Passing 3/4 in.Sieve
%>3/4 in. 13.2 %<No.200 51.8
Atterberg (D 4318): LL PI
NM (D 2216)Sp.G. (D 854)2.62
USCS (D 2487)
AASHTO (M 145)
Date: Sampled 7/13/16
Received 7/13/16
Tested
Tested By
COMPACTION TESTING DATA
AASHTO T 99 Method D Standard
1 2 3 4 5 6
WM +WS 9443.3 9657.3 9877.8 10027.1 10087.7
WM 5649.2 5649.2 5649.2 5649.2 5649.2
WW + T #1 812.3 857.0 995.3 944.6 895.7
WD + T #1 784.7 817.4 939.7 885.4 830.8
TARE #1 | 386.9 388.9 386.7 388.6 388.4
WW + T #2
WD + T #2
TARE #2
MOIST.9.2 10.1 11.9 14.7
DRY DENS.____104.3 107.9 112.9 115.0 113.8
SIEVE TEST RESULTS
AASHTO T27 AASHTO T11________
Opening Size % Passing Specs.
6" 100.0 100.0
#200 51.8 10.0 -100.0
TEST RESULTS
Maximum dry density = 115.4 pcf
Material Description
Radon Barrier
Optimum moisture = 11.2 %
Project No. 1604-086 Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Remarks:
Location: W3_______Sample Number: M16-S-051_______________
JONES & DEMILLE ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Checked by:
Title:
Figure
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Curve No. 052
Preparation Method As received
Rammer: Wt. 5.5 lb.Drop 12 in.
Type Pie Shaped Hammer
Layers: No. three Blows per 56
Mold Size 0.075 CU. ft.
Test Performed on Material
Passing 3/4 in.Sieve
%>3/4 in 15.8 %<No.200 42.1
Atterberg (D 4318): LL PI
NM(D 2216)Sp.G. (D 854) 2.62
uses (D 2487)
AASHTO (M 145)
Date: Sampled 7/13/16
Received 7/13/16
Tested 7/14/16
Tested By Trent Sonderegger
COMPACTION TESTING DATA
AASHTO T 99 Method D Standard
1 2 3 4 5 6
WM +WS [ 9688.8 9784.2 10054.1 10098.3
WM 5649.2 5649.2 5649.2 5649.2
WW + T#1 806.4 917.9 826.5 820.9
WD + T #1 777.0 876.6 783.4 773.7
TARE #1 386.2 406.0 387.1 389.2
WW + T #2
WD + T #2
TARE #2
MOIST.7.5 8.8 10.9 12.3
DRY DENS.110.4 111.7 116.8 116.5
SIEVE TEST RESULTS
AASHTO T27 AASHTO T11
Opening Size
6"
#200
% Passing Specs.
100.0~ 100.0
42.1 10.0 -100.0
TEST RESULTS Material Description
Maximum dry density = 117.0 pcf Radon Barrier
Optimum moisture -11.3 %Remarks:
Project No. 1604-086 Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Location: W3 Sample Number: MI6-S-052 Checked by: Mark Rappleyc
JONES & DEMILLE ENGINEERING INC. Title: Materials Manager
Rllhfielll, Utah Figure
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Curve No. 046
Preparation Method As received
Rammer Wt. 5.5 lb.Drop 12 in.
Type Pie Shaped Hammer
Layers: No three Blows per 56
Mold Size 0.075 CU. ft.
Test Performed on Material
Passing 3/4 in.Sieve
%>3/4 in. 13.7 %<No 200 49.7
Atterberg (D 4318): LL PI
NM (D 2216)Sp G. (D 854) 2.62
USCS (D 2487)
AASHTO (M 145)
Date: Sampled 7/11/16
Received 7/11/16
Tested 7/12/16
Tested By Trent Sonderegger
COMPACTION TESTING DATA
AASHTO T 99 Method D Standard
1 2 3 4 5 6
WM +WS 9615.6 9829.6 i 10012.3 10024.2
WM 1 5649.6 5649.6 1 5649.6 5649.6 !
WW + T #1 760.0 818.2 877.4 979.3
WD + T #1 725.9 773.4 ' 818.9 897.8
TARE #1 389.5 386.6 388 . 3 387.0
WW + T#2 1 I
WD + T #2
TARE #2
MOIST.10.1 11,6 13.6 16.0
DRY DENS.! 105.9 110.1 112.9 i 110.9 ;
SIEVE TEST RESULTS
AASHTO T27 ASTMC117
Opening Size % Passing Specs
6" 100.0 100.0
#200 49.7 I0.0-100.0
TEST RESULTS Material Description
Maximum dry density = 112.9 pcf Radon Barrier
Optimum moisture - 13.7 %Remarks:
Project No. 1604-086 Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Location: W5 Sample Number: M16-S-046 ___________________^ Checked by: Mark Rappleye
JONES & DEMILLE ENGINEERING INC. Title: Materials Manager
______________________Richfield, Utah Figure
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Curve No. 048
T5
Q-
incO)■D
&■
Q
Water content, %
Preparation Method As received
Rammer: Wt. 5.5 lb.Drop 12 in.
Type Pie Shaped Hammer
Layers: No three Blows per 56
Mold Size 0.075 CU. ft.
Test Perfonned on Material
Passing 3/4 in.Sieve
%>3/4 in. 1.4 °/o<No.200 45.9
Atterberg (D 4318): Lt.PI
NM (D 2216)Sp G (D 854) 2.62
USCS (D 2487)
AASHTO (M 145)
Date: Sampled 7/12/16
Received 7/12/16
Tested 7/13/16
Tested By Trent Sonderegger
COMPACTION TESTING DATA SIEVE TEST RESULTS
AASHTO T 99 Method D Standard _______________________________AASHTO T27 AASHTO T11
Opening Size % Passing Specs.
6'7 100.0 100.0
1"100.0
3/4"98.6
1/2"95.7
3/8"94.3
#4 87.6
#8 81.7
#16 77.3
#30 74.0
#50 70.7
#100 65.5
#200 45.9 10.0- 100.0
1 2 3 4 5 6
WM + WS 9603.1 9844.1 9971.3 j
WM 5649.6 564 9.6 5649.6
1
WW + T#1 | 836.2 929.4 784.7
WD + T #1 ' 784.6 866.6 1 734.2
TARE #1 j 386.7 387.1 389.5
WW + T#2
1
WD + T #2 1
TARE #2 f
MOIST.13.0 13.1 i 14 ■7
................. ..DRY DENS.102.9 109.0 110.8
TEST RESULTS Material Description
Maximum dry density = 122.6 pcf
Optimum moisture = 13.8 %
Radon Barrier
Remarks:
Project No. 1604-086 Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Location: W5 Sample Number: M16-S-048 Checked by: Mark Rappleye
JONES & DEMILLE ENGINEERING INC. Title: Materials Manager
Richfield, Utah Figure
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Curve No. 049
Q.
■S’
U)cOJ"D
Q
As received
5.5 lb. Drop 12 in.
Pie Shaped Hammer
Blows per 56
0.075 cu. ft.
Sieve
Preparation Method
Rammer Wt
Type
Layers: No. three
Mold Size
Test Performed on Material
Passing 3/4 in.
%>3/4 in. 15.3
Atterberg (D 4318) LL
NM (D 2216)
USCS (D 2487)
AASHTO (M 145)
°» No 200 44.0
PI
Sp.G. (D 854) 2.62
7/13/16
7/13/16
7/13/16
Date: Sampled
Received
Tested
Tested By Trent Sonderegger
COMPACTION TESTING DATA
AASHTO T 99 Method D Standard
1 2 3 4 5 6
WM +WS 9756.1 : 9971.1 1Q0TS.0 10039.2
WM 5649.2 5649.2 5649.2 5649.2
WW + T #1 965.4 936.3 932.6 933.6
WD + T #1 906.2 872.5 865.2 858.0
TARE #1 386.7 389.3 387.3 389.7
WW + T #2
WD + T #2
TARE #2
MOIST.11.4 13.2 14 .1 16.1
DRY DENS.108.4 M2.2 112.6 111.1
SIEVE TEST RESULTS
AASHTO T27 AASHTO T11
Opening Size
6"
#200
% Passing Specs.
100.0 100.0
44.0 10.0 -100.0
TEST RESULTS Material Description
Maximum dry density = 112.6 pcf Radon Barrier
Optimum moisture - 14.0 %Remarks:
Project No. 1604-086 Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Location: W5 Sample Number: M16-S-049 Checked by: Mark Rappleye
JONES & DEMILLE ENGINEERING INC. Title: Materials Manager
______________________Richfield, Utah Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
c S - co
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
o o oCN CO 'S'* 5 5
While Mesa - Radon Barrier
4..- (------------
100
% +3"
5.1
10
% Gravel
26.1
0.1
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
% Sand
Coarse Fine
11.4 12.8
o.oi
% Fines
Silt
44.0
0.001
Clay
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11) __
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
Material Description
Radon Barrier
PL=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL« PI-
USCS (D 2487)=
D9o= 39.0644
D50= 0.1686
D10=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 19.7778 D60= 0.6579
d30= ?15=
cu=Cc=
Remarks
Date Received: 7/13/16 Date Tested: 7/13/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger _____
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W5
Sample Number: M16-S-049
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
______Richfield, Utah
Date Sampled: 7/13/16
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 ______________Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
g c ^ g .E .Eo cm 5: - S! s: S o o o
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
o o oO O OCD <- *— CMft
'
Wh te Mesa - Radon Barrier
100
% +3"
4.6
10
% Gravel
24.0
0.1
GRAIN SIZE - mm.
% Sand
0.01
% Fines
Coarse
10.3
Fine Silt
0.001
Clay
11.4 49.7
Opening
Size
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & ASTM C117)
Spec.* Pass?
(Percent) (X=Fail)
Percent
Finer
6"
#200
100.0
49.7
100.0
10.0- 100.0
Material Description
Radon Barrier
PL=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
USCS (D 2487)=
D90= 33.5441
D50= 0.0787
D10=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 15.7374
d30=
cu=
D60= 0.3577
Dir
cc-
Remarks
Date Received: 7/11/16 Date Tested: 7/12/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye ____
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W5
Sample Number: M16-S-046
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Date Sampled: 7/11/16
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 _______Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
■- -- i?
m cm t—
£ E E m- S! ^ 5i
o o o O O O O O oCM CO ^ CO ’— ’— CM1* ft ft100
90
80
70
cnLit
2 60
LL
h-
Z 50
Lit
O
CL 40
Lit
0.
30
20
10
100
Wh te Mesa - Radon Barrier
:—j--1 -
10 0.1 0.01 0.001
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
% +3"
5.3
% Gravel
2X9~
% Sand
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO Til)
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
Coarse
11.8
Radon Barrier
Fine
13.3
% Fines
Silt
41.7
Clay
Material Description
PL=
USCS (D 2487)=
D90= 41.2646
D50= 0.2218
D10=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 21.4720 D60= 0.8191
?30= d15=
cu=Cc=
Remarks
Date Received: 7/13/16 Date Tested: 7/13/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger ______ ________
Checked By: Mark Rappleye __
Title: Materials Manager _____ ________
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W5
Sample Number: MI6-S-050 Date Sampled: 7/13/16
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
GRAIN SIZE - mm.
% +3"
0.0
% Gravel
4.3
% Sand
Coarse Fine
4.4 32.6
% Fines
Silt Clay
58.7
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
Material Description
Radon Barrier
6"100.0
1"100.0
3/4"100.0
1/2"99.7
3/8"99.5
#4 97.9
#8 96.1
#16 94.6
#30 93.2
#50 89.9
#100 86.0
#200 58.7
100.0
PL=
USCS (D 2487)=
D90= 0.3145
d50=
D10=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 0.1438 D60= 0.0770
?30= ?15=
cu=Cc=
10.0- 100.0 Remarks
Date Received: 7/12/16 Date Tested: 7/13/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger __________
Checked By: Mark Rappleye ________ ______
Title: Materials Manager _______
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W5
Sample Number: M16-S-047 _
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Date Sampled: 7/12/16
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
■= £ js;CO Csl T-
o o o
cnj co -crtt100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
: ! ' !
o o oo o- oT- t- CSCft eft
-4
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
i .
i
100
% +3"
4.4
10
% Gravel
23.0
1
GRAIN SIZE - mm.
% Sand
Coarse Fine
9.8 11.0
0.1 0.01
% Fines
Silt
51.8
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO Til)
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
Material Description
Radon Barrier
PL=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
USCS (D 2487)=
D90= 31.3540
d50=
D10=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 14.2216 D60= 0.2730
d30= d15=
Cu=Cc=
Remarks
0.001
Clay
Date Received: 7/13/16 Date Tested: 7/14/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger_____________________
Checked By: Mark Rappleye _____ __
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W3
Sample Number: M16-S-05L Date Sampled: 7/13/16
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-()8MBJBBPHBIB Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
% +3"
0.0
% Gravel
19.5
% Sand
Coarse Fine8.2 | 26.4
% Fines
Silt
45.9
Clay
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
6"100.0 100.0
1"100.0
3/4"98.6
1/2"95.7
3/8"94.3
#4 87.6
#8 81.7
#16 77.3
#30 74.0
#50 70.7
#100 65.5
#200 45.9 10.0-100.0
Material Description
Radon Barrier
PL=
USCS (D 2487)=
D90= 5.9556
D50= 0.0847
D10=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 3.6032
d30=
Cu=
D60= 0.H76
q1§=
Cc"
Remarks
Date Received: 7/12/16 Date Tested: 7/13/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W5
Sample Number: M16-S-048 Date Sampled: 7/12/16
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield. Utah
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
o o oeg cn gt gt *
o o oo gr o
gg gg gg
100 10
Wh te Mesa - Radon Barrier
0.1 0.01 0.001
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
% +3"
4.4
% Gravel
23.2
% Sand % Fines
Coarse
9.9
Fine
III
Silt Clay
51.4
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
Material Description
Radon Barrier
PL=
Atterbeig Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
USCS (D 2487)=
□90= 31.7596
d50=
D10=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 14.4984 D6Q= 0.2874
?30= ?15=
Cc=
Remarks
Date Received: 7/11/16 Date Tested: 7/12/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger __________
Checked By: Mark Rappleye____________
Title: Materials Manager _
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W5
Sample Number: MI6-S-045 Date Sampled: 7/11/16
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086______Figure
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Curve No. 056
Preparation Method As received
Rammer Wt 5.5 lb.Drop 12 in.
Type Pie Shaped Hammer
Layers No three Blows per 56
Mold Size 0.075 CU. ft.
Test Performed on Material
Passing 3/4 in.Sieve
%>3/4 in. 14.7 °o<No 200 46.1
Atterberg (D 4318): LL PI
NM (D 2216)Sp.G. (D 854) 2.62
USCS (D 2487)
AASHTO (M 145)
Date: Sampled 7/18/16
Received 7 18 16
Tested 7/18/16
Tested By_______Trent Sonderegger
COMPACTION TESTING DATA
AASHTO T 99 Method D Standard
1 2 3 4 5 6
WM + WS 9388.6 9585.8 9800.4 10000.3 10011.6
WM 5649.0 5649.0 5649.0 5649.0 5649.0
WW + T #1 995.8 891.6 978.8 943.2 957.0
WD + T #1 948.8 850.7 916.9 876.0 881.2
TARE #1
WW + T #2
WD + T #2
TARE #2
389.0 405.7 386.0 388.4
1
386.6
MOIST.8 . 4 9.2 11.7 13.8 ;15.3
DRY DENS.101.4 106.0 109.3
! 112.4 !111.2
SIEVE TEST RESULTS
AASHTO T27 AASHTO T11
Opening Size % Passing Specs.
6" 100.0 100.0
#200 46.1 10.0-100.0
TEST RESULTS Material Description
Maximum dry density = 1 12.5 pcf Radon Barrier
Optimum moisture = 14.0 %Remarks:
Project No. 1604-086 Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Location: W5 Sample Number: MI6-S-056 ________________________ Checked by: Mark Rappleye
JONES & DEMILLE ENGINEERING INC. Title: Materials Manager
______________________Richfield, Utah Figure
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
Curve No. 053
tj
Q-
wc(U"D
&■
Q
Preparation Method As received
Rammer: Wt. 5.5 lb. Drop 12 in.
Type Pie Shaped Hammer
Layers: No. three Blows per____56
Mold Size___ 0.075 CU. ft.
Test Performed on Material
Passing 3/4 in. Sieve
%>3/4 in. 16.0 _ %<No.200 41.4
Atterberg (D 4318): LL PI
NM (D 2216) Sp.G. (D 854) 2.62
USCS (D 2487)________________
AASHTO (M 145)___________________
Date: Sampled_ 7/13/16 __
Received _ 7/13/16
Tested _ 7/14/16
Tested By____Trent Sondereggcr
COMPACTION TESTING DATA
AASHTO T 99-01 Method D Standard
WM +WS
WM
WW + T #1
WD + T #1
TARE #1
WW + T #2
WD + T #2
TARE #2
1 2 3 4 5
9464.5 10052.3 10067.2 9994.0
5649.2 5649.2 5649.2 5649.2
912.0 865.2 902.4 850.3
863.9 814.5 840.3 784.4
389.3 386.1 390.1 388.4
MOIST.10.1 11.8 13.8 16.6
DRY DENS.101.8 115.7 114.1 109.5
SIEVE TEST RESULTS
AASHTO T27 AASHTO T11
Opening Size % Passing Specs.
6"100.0 100.0
#200 41.4 10.0- 100.0
TEST RESULTS Material Description
Maximum dry density = 116.8 pcf Radon Barrier
Optimum moisture = 12.4 %Remarks:
Project No. 1604-086 Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Location: W3Sample Number: M16-S-053 Checked by: Mark Rappleye
JONES & DEMILLE ENGINEERING INC. Title: Materials Manager
____________________Richfield, Utah Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
£ ■£ s s ~ eCO CN T- r- ^ >S CO
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0 100
o o oO O O O O TT oCN CO ■'l' CD T- CN^ ^ » ^ =»= =«:
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
10 0.1 0.01 0.001
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
% +3"
4.9
% Gravel
~ 25.8
% Sand
Coarse Fine
11.0 12.2
% Fines
Silt Clay
46.1
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
Material Description
Radon Barrier
6"
#200
100.0
46.1
100.0
10.0- 100.0
PL=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
USCS (D 2487)=
D90= 37.1297
D50= 0.1308
D10=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 18.3269
d30=
Cu=
D60= 0.5369
D15=
Cr=
Remarks
Date Received: 7/18/16 Date Tested: 7/18/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger ___________
Checked By: Mark Rappleye__________________
Title: Materials Manager _________
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W5
Sample Number: M16-S-056
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Date Sampled: 7/18/16
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 ____________Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
c C ^ c £CO CN - - ^5 i o o oCnJ r) 'TW:
o o oo oT- T- CMIt % It100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
100
% +3"
10
% Gravel
4.2 21.8
1
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
% Sand
Coarse Fine
9.3 10.4
0.1 0.01
% Fines
Silt
0.001
Clay
54.3
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHT0T11)
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
Material Description
Radon Barrier
6"
#200
100.0
54.3
100.0
10.0- 100.0
PL=
USCS (D 2487)
D90= 28.8216
d50=
D10=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= ills
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 12.5338
°30=
cu"
Remarks
D60= 0.1949
D15=
Cc=
Date Received: 7/18/16 Date Tested: 7/18/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W5
Sample Number: M16-S-057
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Date Sampled: 7/18/16
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086____________________Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
s .e
CO CNJ t-
o o o
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
o o o o o5 5 S
Wh te Mesa - Radon Barrier
- -
100 10 0.1 0.01 0.001
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
% +3"
5.3
% Gravel
28.1
% Sand
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO Til)
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
Coarse
11.9
Radon Barrier
Fine
13.3
% Fines
Silt Clay^
41.4
Material Description
PL=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
USCS (D 2487)=
D9o= 41.5858
D50= 0.2306
D10=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 21.7232 D60= 0.8449
930= d15=
cu=Cc=
Remarks
Date Received: 7/13/16 Date Tested:
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger __________
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
7/14/16
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W3
Sample Number: M16-S-053 Date Sampled: 7/13/16
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
i a I I i o o oCM CO% % %
O O OO M- Ot- CM
too
90
80
70
cemz 60
it.
h-z 50
111oa:40uuQ.
30
20
10
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
% +3"
4.6
% Gravel
24.2
% Sand
Coarse Fine
10.3 11.5
% Fines
Silt
49.4
Clay
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & ASTMC117)
—^.................................— —.----------------------Opening Percent Spec. Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
Material Description
Radon Barrier
PL=
USCS (D 2487)=
D9o= 33.8102
D50= 0.0819
D10=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 15.9250
530=
cu=
Remarks
D60= 0.3692
?15=
Cc=
Date Received: 7/14/16 Date Tested: 7/14/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager _____
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W5
Sample Number: M16-S-054
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Date Sampled: 7/14/16
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086____________________Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
o o oCNJ CO^ %S 5 S
100
90
80
70
60
50
LUO
CC 40
LU
CL
30
20
10
0
—4
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
100 10 1
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
o.i 0.01 o.ooi
% +3”
4.T
% Gravel
21.9
% Sand
Coarse Fine
9.4 10.4
% Fines
Silt
54.1
Clay
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)
Percent Spec.* Pass?
Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
Opening
Size
Material Description
Radon Barrier
PL=
Atterberq Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
USCS (D 2487)=
D90= 29.0328
d50=
D10=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 12.6719
d30=
Cu=
D60= 0.2007
D15=
Cc=
Remarks
Date Received: 7/14/16 Date Tested: 7/14/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger ___
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W5
Sample Number: M16-S-055
Date Sampled: 7/14/16
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
0.01 0.001
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
% +3"
0.0
% Gravel
8.3
% Sand
Coarse Fine
8.3 35.2
% Fines
Silt J Clay
48.2
Test Results (AASHTO T27 8, ASTM C117)
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
6"100.0 100.0
I"100.0
3/4"100.0
1/2"100.0
3/8"99.3
#4 96.6
#8 92.6
#16 89.2
#30 86.2
#50 79.9
#100 70.2
#200 48.2 10.0- 100.0
Material Description
Radon Barrier
PL=
USCS (D 2487)=
D90= 1.4287
D50= 0.0788
D10=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 0.5096
d30=
Cu=
D60= 0.1049
?15=
Cc=
Remarks
Date Received: 7/21/16 Date Tested:
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
7/21/16
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W5
Sample Number: M16-S-058 Date Sampled: 7/21/16
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
C co- s s s 1* ** 1*
o o o O O o(D CMW W:100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
~ J
li ii
' i
1
'1I
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
100 10 0.1 0.01 0.001
GRAIN SIZE - mm.
% +3"
4.6
% Gravel
24.0
% Sand
Coarse Fine
10.3 11.4
% Fines
Silt
49.7
Clay
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHT0T11)
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
Material Description
Radon Barrier
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
PL= LL= Pl=
uses (D 2487)=
Dg0= 33.5380
D50= 0.0787
D10=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 15.7330
d30=
cu=
Remarks
D60= 0.3574
Dl5=
Date Received: 7/21/16 Date Tested: 7/21/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W5
Sample Number: M16-S-059
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Date Sampled: 7/21/16
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 ______________Figure
c c sc:
CO CM
o o o o o oCD t- OJ«: Ct Ct C!
Particle Size Distribution Report
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
fri
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
100 10 0.1 0.01 0.001
GRAIN SIZE - mm.
% +3"% Gravel
3.9 20.4
%Sand
Coarse Fine
9.7
% Fines
Silt Clay
8.7 57.3
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHT0T11)
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
6"
#200
100.0
57.3
100.0
10.0- 100.0
Material Description
Radon Barrier
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
IICL LL= Pl=
Classification
uses (D 2487)=AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
Dg0= 25.5973 D85= 10.4906 D60= 0.1213
d50=030= d15=
D10=cu= cc=
Remarks
Date Received: 7/22/16 Date Tested: 7/22/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W5
Sample Number: M16-S-060 Date Sampled: 7/22/16
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
£ £ s(O Oi f—
O O OCM CO ■'J-»100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
t Tt
S 5 5
■4-J-J—
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
4 4
100 10 1
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
o.i 0.01 0.001
% +3"
4.0
% Gravel
21.0
% Sand
Coarse
8.9
Fine
10.1
% Fines
Silt
56.0
Clay
Test Results (ASTM C136& AASHTO Til)
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
Material Description
Radon Barrier
6"
#200
100.0
56.0
100.0
10.0- 100.0
PL=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
USCS (D 2487)=
D90= 26.9400
d50=
D10=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 11.3267
930=
cu=
D60= 0.1488
915=
Remarks
Date Received: 7/22/16 Date Tested: 7/22/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W5
Sample Number: M16-S-061 Date Sampled: 7/22/16
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield. Utah M
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
■E .E ^ E ~ = co
CO CN £ - ^ S S
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
o o o
Wh te Mesa - Radon Barrier
100 10 1
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
o.i 0.01 o.ooi
% +3"% Gravel % Sand % Fines
3.8 20.1
Coarse
8.5
Fine
9.6
Silt
58.0
Clay
Test Results (AASHTO T88 & AASHTO T11)
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
6"
#200
100.0
58.0
100.0
10.0- 100.0
Material Description
Radon Barrier
PL=
AtterbergJJmits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
USCS (D 2487)=
D9o= 24.8097
d50=
D10=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 10.0101 D60= 0.1070
930= ?15=
Cc=
Remarks
Date Received: 7/26/16 Date Tested: 7/26/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W5
Sample Number: M16-S-062 Date Sampled: 7/26/16
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 Figure
ITLU
z:UJ
ocrmD-
Particle Size Distribution Report
5 i = 5 si o o ocm co -a-
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
o o oO 'T O'— '— CMtt % %White Mesa - Radon Barrier
100 10 1
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
0.1 o.oi o.ooi
% +3"
4.9
% Gravel
25.5
% Sand
Coarse Fine
% Fines
Silt Clay
10.8 12.2 46.6
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size________Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
6" 100.0 100.0
#200 46.6 10.0-100.0
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Material Description
Radon Barrier
PL=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
USCS (D 2487)=
Dg0= 36.6017
D50= 0.1218
D10=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 17.9374
d30=
cu=
d60=
D1§=
0.5070
Remarks
Date Received: 7/26/16 Date Tested: 7/26/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
Location: W5
Sample Number: M16-S-063
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Date Sampled: 7/26/16
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No:1604-086 Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
d d ^ d .E .E a,CO CN ^ ^ ^ ^o o oM fO 'TW: ^100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
o o oo 'J- o
I - White Mesa - Radon Barrier
100
% +3"
48
10
% Gravel
25.1
1
GRAIN SIZE - mm.
% Sand
Coarse Fine
10.7 12.0
0.1 0.01
% Fines
Silt
47.4
o.ooi
Clay
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)Material Description
Opening Percent Spec.*Pass?Radon Barrier
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
6"100.0 100.0
#200 47.4 10.0- 100.0 Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
PL= LL= Pl=
USCS (D 2487)=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Dgn= 35.7787
D50= 0.1087
D10=
Coefficients
D85= 17.3358 D60= 0.4630
D3o= d15=
cu_ Cc-
Remarks
Date Received:Date Tested: 7/27/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
-------3-------------White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W5
Sample Number: M16-S-066
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Date Sampled: 7/27/16
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
% +3"
4.5
% Gravel % Sand % Fines
23.8
Coarse
10.1
Fine
11.4
Silt
50.2
j:iay
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)
Opening Percent Spec* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
Material Description
Radon Barrier
6"
#200
100.0
50.2
100.0
10.0- 100.0
Pl_=
uses (D 2487)=
D90= 32.9805
d50=
D10=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318}
LL= Pl=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 15.3424
d30=
Cu=
D60= 0.3343
915=
Cc=
Remarks
Date Received: 7/27/16 Date Tested: 7/27/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger________________
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W5
Sample Number M16-S-067 Date Sampled: 7/27/16
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No:_ 1604-086_________________Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
o o ocvj roW: W «100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
o o oo -v o«- *- CN% fe 4*
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
100
% +3"
4.4
10
% Gravel
23.0
0 1
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
% Sand
Coarse Fine
9.8 11.0
0.01
% Fines
Silt
0.001
Clay
51.8
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHT0T11)
Percent Spec* Pass?
Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
Material Description
Opening
Size
Radon Barrier
PL=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= PI-
USCS (D 2487)=
D90= 31.3434
d50=
D10=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 14.2143 D60= 0.2727
d30= 915=
cu=Cc=
Remarks
Date Received: 7/28/16 Date Tested: 7/28/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W5
Sample Number: M16-S-068 Date Sampled: 7/28/16
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 _________Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
% +3"% Gravel
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
% Sand
0.01
% Fines
Coarse
0.0 4.7 6.8
Fine
34.5
Silt
54.0
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
6"100.0 100.0
1"100.0
3/4"100.0
1/2"99.5
3/8"99.4
#4 98.1
#8 95.9
#16 93.2
#30 90.6
#50 86.8
#100 81.2
#200 54.0 10.0-100.0
Material Description
Radon Barrier
PL =
USCS (D 2487)=
D90= 0.5413
d50=
D10=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 0.1913 D60= 0.0851
d30= d15=
Cu=Cc=
Remarks
0.001
Clay
Date Received: 7/29/16 Date Tested: 7/29/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W5
Sample Number: M16-S-070 Date Sampled: 7/29/16
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 __________Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
C C ^ - CO
O s; S - * s; s o o o
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
5 g 5 5
o o oO 'T O
Wh te Mesa - Radon Barrier
100 10 1
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
o.i 0.01 0.001
% +3"
4.8
% Gravel
25.4
% Sand
Coarse j Fine
12.110.8
% Fines
Silt
46.9
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)
Opening Percent I Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
Material Description
Radon Barrier
PL=
USCS (D 2487)=
D9o= 36.3539
D5o= O.I 177
D10=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 17.7555 D60= 0.4935
d30= d15=
Cu=Cc=
Remarks
day
Date Received: 7/29/16 Date Tested: 7/29/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W5
Sample Number: M16rS-071 Date Sampled: 7/29/16
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
.£ .E ^ -c .= .E o o oc\) cn ^r«:
O O OO TT O
t- T- CJIt «: «:100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
IT ~
f
Ii
I White Mesa - Radon Barrie?
_____!—
100 10 1
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
o.i 0.01 0.001
% +3"
4.2
% Gravel
21.9
% Sand ___
Coarse Fine
9.4 10.5
% Fines
Silt
54.0
Clay
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
Material Description
Radon Barrier
PL=
USCS (D 2487):
D9o= 29.0550
d50=
D10=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 12.6864 O60= 0.2013
d30= d15=
Cc=
Remarks
Date Received: 8/1/16 Date Tested: 8/1/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger__ ______
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager _______
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W5
Sample Number: M16-S-072
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Date Sampled: 8/1/16
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
: No: 1604-086 __________Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
o o oCM CO '■3-% ^100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
* 5 S
r' ' ■, r
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
1. i ii!I ■ !
IS i
100 10 0.1 0.01
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
0.001
% +3"
4.9
% Gravel
26.0
% Sand % Fines
Coarse
11.0
Fine
12.3
Silt
45.8
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)___
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
Material Description
Radon Barrier
PL=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
uses (D 2487)=
Dg0= 37.4295
D5o= 0.1362
D10=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 18.5494 D60= 0.5545
d30= d15=
cu=Cc=
Remarks
Date Received: 8/1/16 Date Tested: 8/I/I6
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W5
Sample Number: M16-S-073
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Clay^
Date Sampled: 8/I/I6
;: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 Figure
o o oO O •'5- OCO t— CN% %
Particle Size Distribution Report
co CNJ T- T- >. N co
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
White Mesa - Radon Barriei
100 10 0.1 0.01 0.001
GRAIN SIZE -mm.
% +3"% Gravel % Sand % Fines
Coarse Fine Silt Clay
4.6 24.2 10.3 11.6 49.3
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
Material Description
Radon Barrier
6"
#200
100.0
49.3
100.0
10.0- 100.0
PL=
USCS (D 2487)=
Dg0= 33.9037
D50= 0.0830
D10=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 15.9911
d30=
Cu=
D60= 0.3733
D15=
Cc=
Remarks
Date Received: 8/2/16 Date Tested: 8/2/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W5
Sample Number: MI6-S-078
Date Sampled: 8/2/16
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
T Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
.E
CO CM r-100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
o o oCM CO =» =tfc
o o oO M- O
Wh te Mesa - Radon Barrier
100 10 1
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
0.1 0.01 0.001
% +3"
4.3
% Gravel
22.7
________B Sand
Coarse Fine
9.7 10.8
% Fines
Silt Clay
52.5
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)
Opening
Size
Percent
Finer
Spec.*
(Percent)
Pass?
(X=Fail)
6"
#200
100.0
52.5
100.0
10.0- 100.0
Material Description
Radon Barrier
PL=
USCS (D 2487);
D9o= 30.6331
d50=
D10=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 13.7339 D60= 0.2488
?30= D15=
Cu=Cc=
Remarks
Date Received: 8/3/16 Date Tested: 8/3/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W3
Sample Number: M16-S-79 Date Sampled: 8/3/16
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
c c ^ .cc S £
cm ^ ^ s; s
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
o o oCM CO Tf=» =«;
O O OO M- O■>- CM% %
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
100 10 0.1 0.01 0.001
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
% +3"% Gravel
4.6 24.4
% SanjlJHH|
Tn n ii BPMW Fine I
10.4 11.6
% Fines
Silt Clay
49.0
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)
Opening Percent
Spec.*Pass?
Size Finer (Percent)(X=Fail)
6"100.0 100.0
#200 49.0 10.0- 100.0
Material Description
Radon Barrier
PL=
USCS (D 2487)=
Dg0= 34.2465
D50= 0.0873
D10=
AtterbergJ^imits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 16.2342
530=
Cu=
Remarks
D6o= 0.3886
?15=
Cc=
Date Received: 8/3/16 Date Tested: 8/3/16
Tested By: Mark Rappleye
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W3
Sample Number: M16-S-080 Date Sampled: 8/3/16
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield. Utah
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
% +3"
0.0
% Gravel
0.4
% Sand % Fines
Coarse
0.7
Fine
31.3
Silt
67.6
Clay
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
6"100.0 100.0
l"100.0 ;
3/4"100.0
1/2"100.0 i
3/8"100.0
#4 99.9
#8 99.6
#16 99.4
#30 99.1
#50 98.6
#100 96.5
#200
-------S-------------
67.6 10.0- 100.0
!
Material Description
Radon Barrier
PL=
USCS (D 2487)=
D90= 0.1206
d50=
D10=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 0.1067 D60=
030= d15=
Cu=Cc=
Remarks
Date Received: 8/9/16 Date Tested: 8/9/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger _________
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W3
Sample Number: M16-S-08J Date Sampled: 8/9/16
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 r ^Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
c c ^ c .E .E goCO CNJ ^ ^ CO
o o oCM CO 'I« :tt: W
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
44----------,—
o o oo -cr o
fe n ^White Mesa - Radon Barrier
100 10 1
GRAIN SIZE - mm.
o.i o.oi
% +3"
3.2
% Gravel
17.0
% Sand
Coarse Fine
7.2 8.0
% Fines
Silt
64.6
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
Material Description
Radon Barrier
PL=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
USCS (D 2487)=
D90= 17.7694
050=
D10=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
Dg5= 6.0676
d30=
Cu=
Remarks
D60=
D15=
Date Received: 8/9/16 Date Tested: 8/9/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W3
Sample Number: M16-S-083
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
0.001
Clay
Date Sampled: 8/9/16
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
o o oC>i M "T* %100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100 10
o o oO O T OCD c- y- CMft ft ft ft
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
1
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
0.1 o.oi o.ooi
% +3"
~ 5.2
% Gravel
27.5
% Sand
Coarse I Fine
11.7 13.1
% Fines
Silt Clay
42.5
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
Material Description
Radon Barrier
PL=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
USCS (D 2487)=
D90= 40.5125
D50= 0.2023
D10=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 20.8877 D60= 0.7610
930= 915=
Cc=
Remarks
Date Received: 8/10/16 Date Tested: 8/10/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager______________________
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W5
Sample Number: M16-S-084 _
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Date Sampled: 8/10/16
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
c c c .£ _n cs, ^ ^ S S
o o o. . O 't oCN CO CO t- ^ W«: «:100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10 f4-ir
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
100 10 1
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
o.i 0.01 0.001
% +3"% Gravel % Sand % Fines
4.7 24.8
Coarse
10.6
Fine Silt
11.8 48.1
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)
Opening
Size
Percent
Finer
Spec.*
(Percent)
Pass?
(X=Fail)
6"
#200
100.0
48.1
100.0
10.0- 100.0
Material Description
Radon Barrier
PL=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
USCS (D 2487)=
D9o= 35.1319
D50= 0.0992
D10=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 16.8679 D60= 0.4304
d30= D15=
Cu=Cc=
Remarks
Clay
Date Received: 8/10/16 Date Tested: 8/10/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye _____
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W5
Sample Number: M16-S-085
Date Sampled: 8/10/16
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
c c c .£ .£ 5n cj t- ^ s; S S
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
100
o o org r} -a-» tt »
o o oo o gf oCD ' '— egg*
Wh te Mesa - Radon Barrier
100 10 1
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
0.1 0.01 0.001
% +3"
3.1
% Gravel
16.4
% Sand
Coarse Fine
7.0 7.9
% Fines
Silt
65.6
Clay
Opening
Size
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHT0T11)
Spec.* Pass?
(Percent) (X=Fail)
Percent
Finer
6"
#200
100.0
65.6
100.0
10.0- 100.0
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W3
Sample Number: M16-S-087
JONES & DEMILLE ENGINEERING INC. B Richfield! Utah 1
Material Description
Radon Barrier
PL=
USCS (D 2487)=
D90= 16.6025
d50=
D10=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 5.4799 HI D60=
D3o= d15=
Cu=Cc=
Remarks
Date Received: 8/9/16 Date Tested: 8/9/16
Tested By: Micklane Farmer
Checked By: Mark Rappleye______
Title: Materials Manager _____
Date Sampled: 8/9/16
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
S s c E .E ~o o oCsj rt Tf% %
o o oo o oCD OJ» tt %100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
100
% +3"
4.5
10
% Gravel
23.6
0.1
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
% Sand
Coarse Fine
10.0 11.2
0.01
% Fines
Silt
50.7
0.001
Clay
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
6"
#200
100.0
50.7
100.0
10.0- 100.0
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W5
Sample Number: M16-S-086
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Material Description
Radon Barrier
PL=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
USCS (D 2487)=
D90= 32.5271
D50=
D10=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 15.0271
930=
Cu=
D60= 0.3162
Q15=
Remarks
Date Received: 8/11/16 Date Tested:
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
8/11/16
Date Sampled: 8/11/16
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086__________________Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
c c ^
n cn
C — — go o o o
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
fiT
i ft
_j_ _
100 10 1
GRAIN SIZE - mm.
o 1 0.01 0.001
% +3"
4.6
% Gravel
24.0
% Sand
Coarse Fine
10.2 11.4
% Fines
Silt
49.8
Clay
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
Material Description
Radon Barrier
6"
#200
100.0
49.8
100.0
10.0- 100.0
PL=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
USCS (D 2487)=
D9o= 33.4622
D50= 0.0778
D10=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 15.6798
d30=
Cu=
D60= 0.3542
D15=
Cc=
Remarks
Date Received: 8/l I/16
Tested By: Justin Baker
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
Date Tested: 8/12/16
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W5
Sample Number: MI6-S-087
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Date Sampled: 8/H/16
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086_______________.Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
c .5 .S=o o oCM CO 'T
O O OO OT- T- CM% %100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
tT
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
-F-+
100 10 0.1 0.01 0.001
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
% +3"
4.8
% Gravel
25.0
% Sand
Coarse Fine
10.7 12.0
Fines
Silt
47.5
Clay
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)
Opening
Size
Percent
Finer
Spec.*
(Percent)
Pass?
(X=Fail)
6”
#200
100.0
47.5
100.0
10.0- 100.0
Material Description
Radon Barrier
PL=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
uses (D 2487)=
D9o= 35.6754
D50= 0.1071
D10=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 17.2608 D60= 0.4576
D30= d15=
Cu=Cc=
Remarks
Date Received: 8/11/16 Date Tested: 8/11/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W5
Sample Number: M16-S-088
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Date Sampled: 8/11/16
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086______________.Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
c c c Ec .E .£n CM ^ S5 o
o o oO M- OCM CM M- CD *- *- CMO O O
%ft %100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
li: ' 1 ! i__i __ I !:i ; M •!__L
1
!
n I :
! i 1 • 1 1
-tm+t
100 10 1
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
o.i 0.01 o.ooi
% +3"
4.9
% Gravel
25.9
% Sand
Coarse Fine
11.1 12.3
% Fines
Silt
45.8
Clay
Test Results (AASHTO T27 &^ASHTO T11)
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
Material Description
Radon Barrier
6"
#200
100.0
45.8
100.0
10.0- 100.0
PL=
USCS (D 2487)=
D9o= 37.3864
D50= O.I 354
D10=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 18.5173
?30=
Cu=
D60= 0.5520
d15=
Cc=
Remarks
Date Received: 8/12/16 Date Tested: 8/12/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W5Sample Number: M16-S-089
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Date Sampled: 8/12/16
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086__________________Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
£ £ n r-
o o oCN rj 'Tft %
o o oO 'T O«- *- rg
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
■
100
% +3"
4.5
10
% Gravel
23.7
o 1
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
% Sand
Coarse Fine
10.1 11.3
0.01
% Fines
Silt
50.4
o.ooi
Clay
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHT0T11)
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
Material Description
Radon Harrier
PL=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
USCS (D 2487)=
Dg0= 32.8602
d50=
D10=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 15.2585
d30=
Cu=
D60= 0.3294
d15=
Cc=
Remarks
Date Received: 8/12/16 Date Tested: 812/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W5
Sample Number: MI6-S-090 Date Sampled: 8/12/16
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 ________________Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
.E ^ .E - - coCO CVi £ - ^ ^ ^o o oCM CO "C% % %
o o o O O ■M- oCO T- T- CM% % % %
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
% +3"
5.2
% Gravel
27.4
% Sand
Coarse Fine
11.7 13.0
% Fines
Silt
42.7
Clay
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)Material Description
Opening Percent Spec.*Pass?Radon Barrier
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
6"100.0 100.0
#200 42.7 10.0- 100.0 Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
PL= LL= Pl=
USCS (D 2487)=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
D9o= 40.3508
D50= 0.1983
D10=
Coefficients
D85= 20.7628 D6o= 0.7490
d3o= d15=
Cu= Cc”
Remarks
Date Received: 8/15/16 Date Tested: 8/15/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
-------*-------------
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W5
Sample Number: M16-S-091
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Date Sampled: 8/15/16
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 _______________Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
c c ^
Cl CM *—
O O OCM Cl M"It It %
O O O O O M- OCD CMtt tt tt tt
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
-t...I----i—.....4 ti-M-iU
1—ii-....-.-i——i.
100 10 0 1 0.01 0 001
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
% +3"
4.7
% Gravel
24.8
% Sand
Coarse Fine
10.5 11.8
% Fines
Silt
48.2
Clay
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
Material Description
Radon Barrier
PL=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
USCS (D 2487)=
D90= 35.0286
D50= 0.0978
D10=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 16.7935
930=
Cu=
D60= 0.4253
d15=
Cr.-
Remarks
Date Received: 8/15/16 Date Tested: 8/15/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W5Sample Number: M16-S-092
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Date Sampled: 8/15/16
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086__________________Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
c c c .E .ECO CM ^ ^ ^ §
o o oO O O O O ■'T Ocm n "T co ’— cm% % % % % %
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
% +3"
0.0
% Gravel
9.4
% Sand
Coarse Fine
7.0 31.9
% Fines
Silt
51.7
Clay
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO Til)
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
Material Description
Radon Barrier
6"100.0
1"100.0
3/4"100.0
1/2"98.5
3/8"97.7
#4 94.5
#8 91.3
#16 88.3
#30 85.7
#50 82.0
#100 77.5
#200 51.7
100.0
PL=
USCS (D 2487)=
Dgo= 1.7713
d50=
D10=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 0.5341 D60= 0.0902
030= d15=
Cu=Cc=
10.0- 100.0 Remarks
Date Received: 8/16/16 Date Tested: 8/16/16
Tested By: Trent Sqnderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W5
Sample Number: M16-S-093
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Date Sampled: 8/16/16
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086__________Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
~ r. ^ •- ^c .5 o o ocm co ■•a-% %
o o oO O M- OCO t- t- CM% % « %100
90
80
70
cnLUZ 60
LL
Z 50
LU
O
ir 40
LU
CL
30
20
10
l;l I White Mesa - Radon Barrier
100
% +3"
5.5
10
% Gravel
28.6
0.1
GRAIN SIZE - mm.
% Sand
Coarse Fine
12.2 13.6
0.01
% Fines
Silt
40.1
0.001
Clay
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
Material Description
Radon Barrier
PL=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
USCS (D 2487)=
D90= 42.7461
D5o= 0.2646
D10=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 22.6387
d30=
Cu=
D60= 0.9433
d15=
Cc=
Remarks
Date Received: 8/16/16 Date Tested: 8/16/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W5
Sample Number: M16-S-094
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Date Sampled: 8/16/16
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 _______Figure
LU
LUocrLU
D.
Particle Size Distribution Report
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
% +3"
4.7
% Gravel
24.9
% Sand
Coarse^ Fine
10.6 11.8
% Fines
Silt
48.0
Clay
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
i oo.o ' icoo
#200 48.0 10.0-100.0
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Material Description
Radon Barrier
PL=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
uses (D 2487)=
D9o= 35.2512
D50= 0.1009
D10=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 16.9538
d30=
Cu=
Remarks
D60= 0.4363
°cX
Date Received: 8/I6/16 Date Tested: 8/16/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: MarkRappleye
Title: Materials Manager
Location: W5
Sample Number: M16-S-095 __
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Date Sampled: 8/16/16
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No:1604-086 Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
o o o_ _ _ O ■'T OCO tJ- CO t- CMO O O
% %% %100
90
80
70
crLU
z 60
LL
z so
LU
O
ce 40
LU0-
30
20
10
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
___-4__
i i .
100 10 0 1 0.01 0.001
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
% +3"
5.5
% Gravel
28.8
% Sand
Coarse Fine
12.3 13.7
% Fines
Silt
39.7
Clay
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & ASTMC117)Material Description
Opening Percent
Spec.*Pass?Radon Barrier
Size Finer (Percent)(X=Fail)
6"100.0 100.0
#200 39.7 10.0- 100.0 Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
PL= LL= Pl=
USCS (D 2487)=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Dg0= 43.0912
D50= 0.2754
D10=
Coefficients
D85= 22.9134 D60= 0.9741
d30= d15=
cu= Cc=
Remarks
Date Received: 8/17/16 Date Tested: 8/17/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: MarkRappleye
-------1-------------
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W1
Sample Number: M16-S-Q96
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Date Sampled: 8/17/16
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086____________________Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
c c ^ cc .S .E
(M ^ ^ ro o o o(>J CO TTW: «: tt
O O Oo Oc— CM*fc 1* Mfc100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
tr
100 10 0.1 0.01 0.001
GRAIN SIZE - mm.
% +3"
5.4
% Gravel
28.7
% Sand
Coarse Fine
12.1 13.7
% Fines
Silt
40.1
Clay
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)Material Description
Opening Percent Spec.*Pass?Radon Barrier
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
6"100.0 100.0
#200 40.1 10.0- 100.0 Atterberg Limits (ASTWI D 4318)
PL= LL= P!=
USCS (D 2487)=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
D9o= 42.6936
□50= 0.2630
D10=
Coefficients
D85= 22.5971 D60= 0.9386
d3o= °1§=
Remarks
Date Received: 8/17/16 Date Tested: 8/17/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
-------1-------------
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W1
Sample Number: ML6-S-097
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Date Sampled: 8/17/16
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 ________Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
o o oCN CO» 1* %
o •a- aT- T- CMCC te It
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
While Mesa - Radon Barrier
itm-tT
Til
100 10 0.1 0.01 0.001
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
% +3"
5.4
% Gravel
28.1
% Sand
Coarse Fine
12.0 13.4
% Fines
Silt
41.1
Clay
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & AASHTO T11)Material Description
Opening Percent
Spec.*Pass?Radon Barrier
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
6"100.0 100.0
#200 41.1 10.0- 100.0 Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
PL= LL= Pl=
USCS (D 2487)=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
D90= 41.8241
D50= 0.2372
D10=
Coefficients
D85= 21.9102 D60= 0.8645
°30= Dl5=
cu= Cc“
Remarks
Date Received: 8/17/16 Date Tested: 8/17/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
-------1------------
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W1
Sample Number: M16-S-098
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Date Sampled: 8/17/16
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086__________________Figure
Particle Size Distribution Report
o o oo oin -<* tD t- *- rgo o o
«: tt %100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
M f i
I !' !
“IItT
m-
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
100 10 0.1 0.01 0.001
GRAIN SIZE-mm.
% +3"
5.6
% Gravel
29.2
% Sand
Coarse Fine
12.4 13.9
% Fines
Silt
38.9
Clay
Test Results (AASHTO T27 & ASTM C117)
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
Material Description
Radon Barrier
PL=
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
LL= Pl=
uses (D 2487)=
D9o= 43.7944
D50= 0.2986
D10=
Classification
AASHTO (M 145)=
Coefficients
D85= 23.4766
?30=
Cu=
D60= 1.0393
015=
Cc=
Remarks
Date Received: 8/18/16 Date Tested: 8/19/16
Tested By: Trent Sonderegger
Checked By: Mark Rappleye
Title: Materials Manager
White Mesa - Radon Barrier
Location: W1
Sample Number: M16-S^099
JONES & DEMILLE
ENGINEERING INC.
Richfield, Utah
Date Sampled: 8/18/16
Client: Energy Fuel Resources
Project: White Mesa Mill Cell #2 Reclamation
Project No: 1604-086 Figure
l:\
D
e
s
i
g
n
-
D
r
a
f
t
i
n
g
\
C
l
i
e
n
t
s
-
A
-
H
\
E
N
E
R
G
Y
FU
E
L
S
\
0
1
3
-
S
h
e
e
t
Se
t
\
2
0
1
6
-
4
-
6
CE
L
L
2 DE
S
I
G
N
DR
A
W
!
N
G
S
\
B
O
R
R
O
W
—i , \--------------------------------------------------i------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wmm I?
' noAiftf-W »■ ' ' ' '
3
N 10.166,000 / \
wi ^
/ RANDOM ^
v FILL / " I, .
r-'-c--
5
N
z)n
i /
I f W3
| RANDOM \\
,
I
/
iiic> =-Xtsj$=if
N 10.164.000
i! A, f>v\ ■' ; ''ZZZZLZ^rZ-iiB
\
) y.
A/jl [l
kfi,
— A
p;»f
^ V.Z- v. v )
? y .f? /jl \ AAfcAAA
|T-I :
vAl WnW'//^
-“A..., \ .........-....................... ^ - -...................3 .33.; V.-
r * *
/------1a L E1 l
h'opsoiil\ 1
F,LL ,
:v y
IgA-,:
\ ^
I TOPSOIL \ /
"wF \
\ RANDOM FILL
(RANDOM \ ; V } l \\U\A
; SMa
; / a
i ,. A
62pOO , / //v / / / „ {/i'r'XJ}\ y,-~. \vl\I ci//1 n\W(V v?^'C\y\v
E4
RANDOM
4^,FILL
( CwY
\ ES
\ RANDOM
•_ \ FILL
|
'A'
^ / I \f z , wp
XZ# :Z' ZtU
- : Z))»
K'
//A yy
iwn )MM < !(A<aA AaAAJ:^ wnM '0A11 ((L \Z \:.:: A/n A
/ , Xv V RANDOM \
AUVi ) ) FILL yB | pA' F,LL SwiAa\ yi
Amm
AfrAJL ________
\
\ E8 \1 UUWJ
^FILL /yjm nfe^iifZ 'Kf
ymmm ■ ________________________________
(/Vi [(^Wi'7(\ Z AA X’1'///A } \ \ \v- \ lZSX \ ' 11 /Ji
(viCT^ I^eo^v) toAd^aUltf TOSOM Miy-
LEGEND
EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION
-5630 ELEVATION OF PROPOSED TOP OF
CELL 2 COVER
r '
V_ A
EXISTING GROUND CONTOUR
(2011 LIDAR SURVEY)
APPROX LIMITS OF BORROW STOCKPILE
ESTIMATED STOCKPILE VOLUMES
BORROW STOCKPILE ID
ESTIMATED STOCKPILE
VOLUME (CY)
E1 15,900
E2 92,000
E3 16,800
E4 66,600
E5 68,800
E6 100,700
E7 74,900
E8 227,300
W1 85,700
W2 584,500
W3 84,800
W4 90,000
W5 2,001,160
W6 93,400
W7 39,500
W8 178,411
W9 60,250
DRAWING REFERENCED);• EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY BASED UPON FILE PROVIDED FROM ENERGY FUELS ON JULY 20. 2015. PER ENERGY FUELS. GROUND SURFACE CONTOURS ARE FROM 2012 AERIAL SURVEY CONDUCTED BY JONES * DeMILLE ENGINEERING INC.. EXCEPT FOR CELLS 2 AND 3. CELL 2 TOPOGRAPHY FROM ENERGY FUELS SURVEY CONDUCTED OCTOBER 2013. CELL 3 TOPOGRAPHY FROM ENERGY FUELS SURVEY CONDUCTED ON JULY B. 2014.
ENERGY FUELS DATE
MAY 2016
L:\
D
e
s
i
g
n
-
D
r
a
f
t
i
n
g
\
C
l
i
e
n
t
s
-
A
-
H
\
E
N
E
R
G
Y
FU
E
L
S
\
0
1
3
-
S
h
e
e
t
Se
t
\
2
0
1
6
-
4
-
6
CE
L
L
2 DE
S
I
G
N
DR
A
W
I
N
G
S
\
P
I
E
Z
O
M
E
T
E
R
S
7/WVYNE ^
GA«W*C
Arizona
In' * '* r
iC'vvl
-
PI 3 | P14 J P15 | PI 6 I P17 P18 [ P19 | P20 [ P21 | P22 j P23 | P2.
M6
///
¥/ ■
L3 L4
K2 K3 K4 K5
‘m; —
J3 J4 ,
12
\\2\
it
E2 63 1E4
D2
=3bii
4.-^-
04
(33 C4
IS
H5
G5
F5
E5
05
CS
L6
K6
I6
H6
G6
F6
E6
L7
K7
I7
H7
06
G7
F7
E7
07
W M9rs. .,x
M10 M11
L12
N13
M12 M13II#
J8
18
H8
G8
J9
19
H9
08
F9
E9
09
09
1
H10
G10
F10
E10
010
010
015 016
HI 5 N16 N1
M15 M16
018 019
N19
L15 L16
K15, .K3L6
" J16
020
N20
H11
G11
F11
E11
011
011
G12
ia«.M3
E12
012
012
B12
G13
E13
013
013
G14
F14
014
314
G15
F15
E15
015
015
B15
A15
G16
F16
El 6
016
016
B16
A16
G17
F17
E17
017
017
•* Kg,
_z
A17
F18
E18
4018
B18
A18
.19
G19
El 9
319
A19
021
N22
K21 K22
026
m
K24
iwJaM :
320
F20
E20
020
020
B20
A20
F21
E21
021
021
B21
A21
E22 E23
023
023
B23
A23
J25
I25
F24
E24
024
024
B24
G25
F25
E25
025
025
B25
A25
.
..^4 V;
uf:- ‘A
mim-1
M26
L26
K26
J26
126
H26
G26
F26
E26
026
026
B26
A26
M27
L27
K27
127
H27
G27
F27
027
027
B27
A27
5#- : ‘ "m
;£2iS
M28
L2, L30 L3,
Wd
L32
M36
039
N39
- ni - ■■ ■.
™ P42
041
M39 M40
L40
N41
M41
L41
N42
M42
L42
f'Si
K2!
" '-P|128
028
B28
A28
19 too
028 029 J330 031
C?9
B29
A29
030
B30
A30
H31
G31
F33
e*-T7
mMk
p mmmmmm^
032
B31
A31
B32
A32
mi
r-
H42
mm
(P: ^
mM'
m
' l- ,
® ®si
Survey Grid Jones & DeMille
Engineering
- infrastructure professionals -
800.748,5275 www.ionesanddemille.com
Energy Fuel Resources SAN JUAN COUNTY
White Mesa Mill Monitoring Survey
Survey Grid Area
SCALE: 1" = 300 ’
1Map Name: H:UD\Proj\1605-316\Design\GIS\Maps\White_Mesa_Mil_Su(vey.mxd
Project Number: 1605-316 | Drown by: JWW 05-16 | Last Edit: 05/24/2016
Photo 1: Cover stockpile borrow operation - Cell 2 Cover. Photo taken August
23,2016.
Photo 3: Water conditioning soils during placement - Cell 2 Cover. Photo
taken August 23, 2016.
Photo 4: Mixing and spreading moistened soil - Cell 2 Cover. Photo taken
August 23, 2016.
Photo 5: Technician preparing to perform field density test. Photo taken -
Cell 2 Cover August 23, 2016.
Photo 7: Final product of compacted Radon barrier - Cell 2 Cover. No photo
of the crew compacting the fill was obtained. Photo taken August 23, 2016.
Photo 6: Preforming a field density test - Cell 2 Cover. Photo taken August 23,
2016.