DRC-2015-006310 - 0901a0688057c01e

Div of Waste Management
> and Radiation Control Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Blvd. Suite 600
SEP 1 1 2015 Lakewood, CO, US, 80228
fM ENERGY FUELS
September 10, 2015
Sent VIA E-MAIL AND OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
Mr. Scott Anderson
Director of Waste Management and Radiation Control
State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144880
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4880
Re: Transmittal of findings for pH assessment in Piezometer 3, and Chloroform wells TW4-26,
TW4-30 and TW4-32 at the White Mesa Mill (the "Mill")
Dear Mr. Anderson:
Pursuant to a request from the Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control ("DWMRC"), Energy
Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. ("EFRI") completed an assessment of the pH in the wells and piezometer
referenced above. The results of the assessment are included as Attachment 1 to this letter.
As noted in Attachment 1, the high pH of Piezometer 3 is likely due to leakage of the cement grout into the
filter pack, which is interacting with groundwater. To address this issue EFRI is proposing abandonment of
Piezometer 3 and replacement with another piezometer as close as practical to the existing Piezometer 3.
Abandonment and replacement activities will be completed in accordance with the current Utah Division of
Water Rights requirements. In addition, the replacement piezometer will be installed in accordance with the
Mill Groundwater Discharge Permit ("GWDP"), Number UGW370004 requirements. An As-Built Report will
be submitted within the time frames specified in the GWDP.
The replacement piezometer will be installed within 90 days of EFRI receipt of approval of this report.
Please contact me if you have any questions or require any further information.
Yours very truly,
ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC.
Kathy Weinel
Quality Assurance Manager
David C. Frydenlund
Harold R. Roberts
David E Turk
Scott Bakken
Logan Shumway
ATTACHMENT 1
Potential Mechanisms: Low pH at TW4-26, TW4-30, and TW4-32;
High pH at Piez-3, White Mesa Uranium Mill
Background
Chloroform monitoring wells TW4-26, TW4-30, and TW4-32 have relatively low pH
values (less than 6). Piezometer 3 (Piez-3) has a relatively high pH of nearly 12.
Chloroform monitoring wells and piezometers 1 through 3 are typically sampled for field
parameters (including pH and electrical conductivity [EC]) and a limited range of
constituents that include chloride and nitrate. To help understand the potential causes of
the apparently anomalous pH values at TW4-26, TW4-30, TW4-32, and Piez-3, samples
collected from these installations during the second quarter of 2015 were analyzed for the
larger suite of constituents typical for MW-series wells at the site. Figures 1 and 2 are
maps showing pH and EC measurements within the area of the site in which the above
installations are located. Table 1 provides analytical results. Lithologic logs for the above
installations and selected nearby borings are attached.
Common Elements
All of the installations having apparently anomalous pH are isolated and surrounded by
installations having nearer-neutral pH (Figure 1). At two of the three wells having
relatively low pH (TW4-26 and TW4-30), the pH has been relatively constant since
installation, indicating that conditions causing the low pH existed prior to well
installation (Figure 3). The pH at TW4-32 was also initially low but appears to be
dropping, suggesting a contribution from a mechanism activated by well installation.
Wells having low pH also have relatively high EC as shown in Figure 2.
High pH at Piez-3
The Piez-3 pH is nearly 12. As shown in Table 1, the carbonate concentration is
relatively high. The likely cause of the high pH is interaction with the cement grout bore
seal (Llopis, 1991; Gascoyne, 2002; Colangelo and Lytwynyshn, 1987; Martin and
Chow-Lee, 1989). Piez-3 was constructed for water level monitoring only, and has a
relatively small bore diameter (nominally 4 % inches) making placement of an effective
bentonite seal above the filter pack difficult. Cement grout installed above the filter pack
and bentonite bore seal may have leaked into the filter pack, causing interaction between
groundwater and the grout, resulting in the high pH.
Low pH at TW4-26, TW4-30, and TW4-32
At the last sampling (second quarter, 2015), the pH values at TW4-26, TW4-30, and
TW4-32 were reported as 4.1, 5.2, and 3.3, respectively. As discussed above, each well is
surrounded by other wells having nearer-neutral pH indicating localized phenomena.
Each well is also cross-gradient from the tailings cells and is separated from the tailings
cells by more than one well having near-neutral pH. A white precipitate was noted on the
submersible pump used to purge TW4-32 during the recent sampling.
Nitrate is present in all three wells. Nitrate occurs at higher concentrations in wells
directly upgradient of TW4-30 and TW4-32 (TW4-29 and TW4-28, respectively).
Therefore, one source of nitrate to TW4-30 and TW4-32 is perched water upgradient of
these wells flowing past the wells. Nitrate concentrations are relatively high at TW4-26
but concentrations upgradient of TW4-26 (at MW-32, TW4-6, and TW4-23) are low to
non-detect. Therefore the relatively high nitrate at TW4-26 must originate from a source
near TW4-26, at the location of TW4-26 or upgradient of TW4-26, between TW4-26 and
MW-32, TW4-6, and TW4-23.
In addition to low pH, each well has relatively high EC, sulfate and TDS. There is a
negative correlation between sulfate and pH among the three wells; the lowest sulfate
occurs at TW4-30 which has the highest pH and the highest sulfate occurs at TW4-32
which has the lowest pH. There is a general negative correlation between pH and sulfate
at all MW-series wells (Figure 4). Carbonate and bicarbonate are absent at the two wells
having the lowest pH (TW4-26 and TW4-32) suggesting negligible neutralization
capacity (Table 1). There is also a strong correlation between sulfate and EC at all MW-
series site wells (Figure 5). TW4-26 and TW4-30 lie along this trend line; TW4-32 (and
MW-22) do not. The relationship shown in Figure 5 can be used to estimate sulfate at
other TW4-series wells.
EC increases from 4,248 to 4,397 between TW4-29 and TW4-30; from 1,285 to 7,540
between TW4-28 and TW4-32; and from 3,832 to 6,534 between MW-32 and TW4-26.
Using the relationship provided in Figure 5, this implies sulfate increases of
approximately 427 mg/L between TW4-29 and TW4-30; approximately 8,900 mg/L
between TW4-28 and TW4-32; and approximately 2,650 mg/L between MW-32 and
TW4-26.
Preliminary geochemical modeling using available data indicates that many mineral
species such as gypsum, goethite and hematite may be supersaturated at TW4-32. In
addition, a poor charge balance was obtained. These observations, and the position of
TW4-32 off the sulfate/EC trend line, are consistent with the white precipitate noted on
the pump at TW4-32.
One potential cause for the low pH and high sulfate is pyrite degradation releasing acid
and sulfate. Pyrite is reported in the lithologic logs of TW4-30 and TW4-32 as well as
upgradient wells TW4-28 and TW4-29. Pyrite oxidation at the site is likely to occur in
the presence of oxygen or nitrate by the following reactions (HGC, 2014):
FeS2 + 33/4C>2 + 3 '/2H20 = Fe(OH)3 + 2S04
2" + 4H+ (reaction 1)
2FeS2 + 6NO3" + 2H20 = 3N2 + 4S04
2" + 2FeOOH + 2H+ (reaction 2)
As discussed in HGC (2014) pyrite degradation by oxygen (reaction 1) is most likely to
occur where sources of oxygen are present. Oxygen may be introduced dissolved in
oxygen-rich recharge such as wildlife pond seepage or via the gas phase in well casings.
Transport of dissolved oxygen in groundwater is limited by its relatively low solubility
(approximately 9 mg/L). Oxygen transport via well casings is expected to be more
substantial. Oxygen introduced through well casings will be transported into the vadose
zone in wells having screens extending above the water table such as TW4-26, TW4-30,
and TW4-32. Vadose oxygen in contact with the water table represents a substantial
source because, on a mass basis, air contains more than 30 times as much oxygen as the
same volume of oxygen-saturated water. Periodic purging and sampling activities
enhance the mixing of gas-phase oxygen into the groundwater. However, the low
pH/high EC conditions were reported at TW4-26, TW4-30, and TW4-32 at the time of
installation, indicating that the condition pre-dated well installation and could not have
been caused by oxygen transport via the wells; although the apparent downward trend in
pH at TW4-32 may in part be related to oxygen transport via the well since installation.
In the absence of wells, oxygen transport is expected to be limited and is unlikely to have
resulted in the large changes in EC which imply large changes in sulfate (hundreds to
thousands of mg/L).
Because nitrate is present at all three wells, nitrate degradation of pyrite (reaction 2) is a
potential mechanism that could have operated prior to well installation. Assuming
negligible neutralization capacity, there is a sufficient decrease in nitrate between TW4-
29 (located directly upgradient of TW4-30) and TW4-30, and between TW4-28 (located
directly upgradient of TW4-32) and TW4-32 to account for the measured reductions in
pH, but not the changes in EC (reflective of changes in sulfate). As discussed above, the
relatively large changes in EC imply large changes in sulfate (hundreds to thousands of
mg/L) which would require reductions in nitrate concentrations of similar magnitude or
the presence of another oxidant (such as oxygen). Prior to well installation, oxygen
transport is likely to have been insufficient to have caused the measured changes.
Furthermore, substantial acid release is implied by the changes in EC. As there appears to
be insufficient neutralization capacity in the perched groundwater to have buffered pH,
especially at TW4-26 and TW4-32, the pHs should be substantially lower than reported.
The most likely explanation for the large increases in EC (indicating relatively large
increases in sulfate) and relatively small decreases in pH are localized nitrate sources that
also have buffering capacity. Soils above the sandstone units hosting the perched water
(Dakota Sandstone and Burro Canyon Formation) have large neutralization capacities as
implied by the strong reactions with acid noted in the lithologic logs. Water infiltrating
these soils is likewise expected to have a large neutralization capacity after interacting
with the soils. Should this recharge also contain relatively large concentrations of
dissolved nitrate, pH would be buffered as the waters percolated through the Dakota
Sandstone and Burro Canyon Formation and reacted with any pyrite present. Even if the
infiltrating waters should have relatively low neutralization capacity, and even though the
groundwater analyses suggest negligible neutralization capacity, sufficient residual
capacity may exist in the Dakota and Burro Canyon in the form of carbonate minerals.
Potential Problems
Pyrite was not reported in the lithologic log of TW4-26; however, as discussed in HGC
(2012), this is not conclusive, as laboratory analysis detected pyrite in samples from
borings that did not have pyrite noted in the logs. In addition, pyrite is noted in boring
logs for MW-32, TW4-6, and TW4-23, located upgradient of TW4-26.
The pH is relatively high at TW4-27 yet both nitrate and pyrite are present. However, the
pyrite in TW4-27 was reported only at the Brushy Basin contact.
References
Colangelo, R.V. and G.R. Lytwynyshn. 1987. Cement bentonite grout and its effect on
water quality samples: a field test of Volclay grout. In Proceedings of the
National Outdoor Action Conference on Aquifer Restoration, Ground Water
Monitoring and Geophysical Methods (p. 345). National Water Well Association,
December, 1987.
Gascoyne, M. 2002. Influence of grout and cement on groundwater composition.
POSIVA Working Report 7. February, 2002
Hydro Geo Chem, Inc. (HGC). 2012. Investigation of Pyrite in the Perched Zone. White
Mesa Uranium Mill Site. Blanding, Utah. December 7, 2012.
HGC. 2014. Hydrogeology of the White Mesa Uranium Mill, Blanding, Utah. Energy
Fuels Resources (USA) Inc., June 6, 2014.
Llopis, J.L. 1991. The effects of well casing material on ground water-quality. EPA
Ground-Water Issue 540/4-91/005. October, 1991.
Martin, W.H., and C. Chow Lee. Persistent pH and tetrahydrofuran anomalies
attributable to well construction. In Proceedings of the Third National Outdoor
Action Conference on Aquifer Restoration, Ground Water Monitoring and
Geophysical Methods (pp. 201 A/213). National Water Well Association,
December, 1989.
TABLE 1
Inorganic Constituent Analytical Results
TW4-26, TW4-30, TW4-32 and PIEZ-03
Analyte TW4-26 TW4-30 TW4-32 PIEZ-03
Ammonia (as N) 1.16
Arsenic ND
Beryllium 16.9
Bicarbonate (as CaC03) ND
Cadmium 51.1
Calcium 438
Carbonate (as CaC03) ND
Chloride 14.4
Chromium ND
Cobalt 215
Copper 11
Fluoride 1.77
Iron 32.9
Lead 2.16
Magnesium 492
Manganese 4,370
Mercury ND
Molybdenum ND
Nickel 205
Nitrate (as N) 11.3
Potassium 35.4
Selenium 10.9
Silver ND
Sodium 696
Sulfate 4,800
Thallium 2
Tin ND
Total Dissolved Solids 6,660
Uranium 1.87
Vanadium ND
Zinc 606
0.0633
ND
4.4
30.2
15.4
457
ND
40.3
ND
74.8
ND
1.18
ND
ND
198
1,350
ND
ND
48.8
1.75
14.1
52.9
ND
443
2,870
4.45
ND
4,000
8.18
ND
163
5.09
15.4
98.4
ND
194
436
ND
62.7
ND
2,960
24
ND
24,900
11.3
814
20,700
ND
ND
1,850
1.21
2.15
84.4
ND
146
9,010
18.6
ND
10,600
40.4
ND
14,300
0.407
ND
ND
ND
ND
178
105
30.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.75
31.1
5.83
ND
58.9
66.7
ND
ND
676
ND
ND
ND
Notes: ND = Not Detected
TWN •03
O
MW-27
TTWN-02
O " -r TWN-04
O
r i
TW4-25
06;71
m' m
;
'TWN-OI
06.98
TW4-2~T
.03.61
^ TW4-24 TW4-22
o
mm JW4-19
TW4?20
+ O
TW4-37
MW-26
TW4-18
O
TW4-05.
*!0 ,t' t-. • • TW4-09
O '
*6.2GV 1TW4-10 TW4-03
I
O
PIEZ-02
©
1
r :
J": PJEZ-03
».*.f
TW4-12
O
OTW4-28
TW4-32
Wmm o
MW-31
•7.08
TW4-02
oe
TW4-13
O
MW-32
MW-04
TW4-07O* OTW4-08
TW4-01 WTW4-36
«...
HW4-04
O TW4-14
O
4£\
MW-25
^rw3-23
^06.25
TW4-06
° TW4-33
O TW4-27
TW4-26
o OTW4-31
TW4-29 OTW4-30
O.
TW4^34
O
WTW4-35
1000 feet
PIEZ-04
EXPLANATION
TW4-37
+ 6.75 temporary perched monitoring well installed NOTE: MW-4, MW-26, TW4-1, TW4-2, TW4-4, TW4-11, TW4-19, TW4-20, TW4-21 and TW4-37 are chloroform pumping wells
March, 2015 showing pH in s.u. TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 are nitrate pumping wells
MW-4
i Z. 7K perched monitoring well showing pH in s.u
TW4-5 temporary perched monitoring well
O 6.43 showing pH in s.u.
PIEZ-3 perched piezometer showing
® 11.95 pH in s.u.
TW4-35 temporary perched monitoring well installed
ft 6.29 May, 2014 showing pH in s.u.
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM, INC.
KRIGED 2nd QUARTER, 2015 pH
WHITE MESA SITE
(detail map)
APPROVED
SJS 7/30/15
REFERENCE H:/718000/
TW26_30_32andP3/UpH0615.srf
TWN-83
0224S PIEZ-02
0
rrw TWN-04
O
03f r MW-27
fit c2
4 • fl
li W4-25
\027< v. TVWflftl
R Z 03
T
W4-18
Ol i
TW4/19
T 22 W4 4?20 O o TW4-05 O 746
37
09
o MW-26
•356Q TW4 ITW4-10 TW4-03 o
o
32
TW4-16
O £
T 4-1
: i *** W4 02
MW-31
•2178 TW4 70 STW36
w o
» -So V XW4-04 yr
>- v/s:! ° / AW4-14
TW4-06 /
Wo* O ^4-27 •IW4-23 X
S3 S3 "3
OTW4-^1
MW-25 W 26 TW4-29 OTW4-30 O
&TW4-35
TW4-34
O
1000 feet
PIEZ-04
if
- W
EXPLANATION
i IIH 01 temporary perched monitoring well installed
+•4956 March, 2015 showing electrical conductivity NOTE: MW-4, MW-26, TW4-1, TW4-2, TW4-4, TW4-11, TW4-19, TW4-20, TW4-21 and TW4-37 are chloroform pumping wells;
in uS/cm TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 are nitrate pumping wells
MW-4
i Zojj perched monitoring well showing
* electrical conductivity in uS/cm
TW4-5 temporary perched monitoring well
O 1492 showing electrical conductivity in uS/cm
PIEZ-3 perched piezometer showing
8 2507 electrical conductivity in uS/cm
TW4-35 temporary perched monitoring well installed May
ft 4431 2014 snow'n9 electrical conductivity in uS/cm
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM, INC.
APPROVED
SJS
KRIGED 2nd QUARTER, 2015
ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITES
WHITE MESA SITE
(detail map)
DATE
7/30/15
REFERENCE H:/718000/
TW26 30 32andP3/Uec0615.srf
1
0 H 1 1
40000 40500 41000
—•—TW4-26pH
—•—TW4-30 pH
—TW4-32 pH
H:\718000\TW26_30_32_andP3\Figures_3_4_5.xlsx: F3 pH
A
41500 42000 42500
Date
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM, INC.
TIME SERIES of pH at MONITORING WELLS
TW4-26, TW4-30 and TW4-32
WHITE MESA SITE
Approved
SJS
Date Author 7/31/15 GEM Date File Name Figure
7/30/1 5 Fi9"'«_3_4-5.xls: F3 pH 3
10000
9000
8000
7000
6000
O)
•p- 5000
CN
o
tn
4000
3000
2000
1000
o o
o o <K
o
o o>^
o \
o o
o MW Series Wells
A TW4-26
A TW4-32
• MW-22
A TW4-30
— - Linear (MW Series Wells)
pH (s.u.)
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM, INC.
SCATTERPLOT of SULFATE CONCENTRATIONS and pH
at MONITORING WELLS, SECOND QUARTER 2015
WHITE MESA SITE
Approved
SJS
Date
7/31/15
Author
GEM
Date
7/30/15
File Name
Fiqures 3 i 5.xls
SQ4 vs pH
Figure
H:\718000\TW26_30_32_andP3\Figures_3_4_5.xlsx: F4 S04 vs pH
9000
8000
7000
^ 6000
u
CO ZL
~ 5000
o
3
T3 C o o 4000
ro o
o
CD UJ 3000
2000
1000
/
/
1000
• MW Series Well
A TW4-26
A TW4-32
2000 3000 4000 5000
S04
2- (mg/L)
6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
# MW-22
A TW4-30
— - Linear (MW Series Well)
HYDRO
GEO
— w CHEM, INC.
SCATTERPLOT of ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY and
SULFATE CONCENTRATIONS at MONITORING WELLS
SECOND QUARTER, 2015, WHITE MESA SITE
Approved
SJS
Dale
7/31/15
Author
GEM
Date
7/30/15
File Name
Figures 3 4 5.x
Figure
H:\718000\TW26_30_32_andP3\Figures_3_4_5.xlsx: F5 EC vs S04
County fo*? r^kj Slate tSr/)j/ Location Rge. _
o
so.o
/2S
/T.v
OS
2a i
22S
27?
US
US
*7S
So.c>
6>S-»
t>7?
74 6e
72.5
77. r
ts*
fz.r-
f?s • c-ir
n
rVA,
Elev.
PASCAL-or,
T.O. PROBE
T.D. DRILL
fed. SRj
Sic
SP
0T7 Ss
an 5s
role
Ir^l
Fin
iFk
14 U If u
5?
3P
REMARKS
IVSl
5P
SP
SP
flfr ffrtf.At dtur <^riL k^jfc, *.s fli^S, A
IM
SP
SP
3* F IF
4*-
k?fz Ss
4H
Fir
5P
9A
3A
IF Ir
Jit' LF_L£
IT in F C
F IF
HP
Ir^l G
L2nl
5A
5^
5A
SA
5A
SPJ P j ^A,^ C^bl>» /p|»>sf ffAJMC^tO
M AjP
IKI
5P
^ll^ jU>\<(
5»
4S
a.
Ml
" w
1\\(JL dfe^^-gA^ot
Uppgv Sru-Sk^ &lSi«> QgAhtd , pif^i"k ^/
Date ^-h01 GP.a\ntjjSSiSiftNWV Drilling Co. %0isks hpbrxf/oA
Property l^hik flfrs*. Project Unit No. Sec.
County rv»^ Ju^n state Uid-W Location
Hole Nn ra/4-23.
_ Twp. Rge. _
Elev.
PYHtTE
m. 2.& tv»s
II v5 5.0 ff i: m m, vs 73"
0.0 ass
/2.i fi 3*
"5h /7. J
206
4h 22,5—I
2i7fl—
275-—
30.0
•ft 320 £2r 5t IS 5!S '-.51 [Lb cr —
370 —
ft ss w.o —
I HA a TL 53 ^ lib —
tf M
if-fa
*53
52.5 PJr; 2.SS 556
&.QA X 62.3
^ r
^7-0 1
In 7^. <?—
7^^
77J-f-
14- Ma\
W7'
«S k. 3.5
I ?3S Si ?5 l/H in £p2 1*3 r,-S»
5T! s 3
575
^7 |+fft-vl+hl 34i
to mm >>.**;
SPSS 5V> cr /7
by-b 20.6—
T.D. DRILL 1ZO.Q
FLU 10 LEVEL
REMARKS OOHE. to*it IM-llO
t/Ari[ Abn^: S^I&)\ttiL ills
Mp(>^T)rsk/rt.\ Fw\ CQINT&O^ a,pprov 3l.P^4;
CAv-bon p U>vi" -^^4 •
Trace hi^'sKMr ,• Spdrr^ rJrjj-t ^ri>\r\ i
6g^in Cart, run
7g> 120.0
PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION IMAGE
7-16-10; 9:50AM;SILVER ARROW STONE ;9286437328 #5/5
Date S'25't6ld GfiolnjSBBS&^W/ Drilling Cn.^/ZfJ Expibfttrt Hoi*. Nn 7tf*l'2b
Property 6^ ^ft /#//Project Ohtorvfpm fnwst/fffttyfoW No Sftr 33 Twp. Rge. H£
County fy/lTtidA. State 7^/? Incotinn VlS Utf L, Wit? J E!ev/^££l_
PYRITE
ft-V
V
llillHHiiii iff*
Si 4 Sb
m 7/5—
5Xv
V SK 99« £2 SHE* *4r *5*
//.a — gas
as* mi m m m 5^!
Mitt CC 22.S MSft Sit
4* r £8 1 mi 2.7.5— m r ia tf 55 5£-— s, :: Si TOP m ass 5=§s m m to r rai I »4 MS 32 5^ II w— Stiff
370 1 !?5S
335! m ft; T
Jt5
r«5 r Si 94 5S-y5.^>— 5BP
11 r SE3 HE y7,^— SB? m io SS.=.i S 0>Q— 9- •• m
m TP tm
5^5 . I
raws ; r 1 n
a m 1 IS bAQ mi
1* 62.£
5S
h ss r 67.6 1
70.6-— f.:':S
i * • 725 «55 3E5T 1 'mi
IrW r <•!••?.
I \dihh 77.3 ^5
i r wm
in r ^5^ 5S! m as
m m
/fST SvsjS
<•:••••',:
^5
96* 4 m<i. 2b V7>5— 1 mm vr/i-S(4
m II Mil
/ OF.
r.o. PROBE JJIQJL
T.D. OR ILL • iOO'Q
FLOW LEVEL 6A.S@8:ibM
REMARKS
^-h>6l T^kotb Fwt ft 13.^ ^
jjAbwyA<M, dtcyr ch^H ^r^A5
11—17—11; 2:1SPM;SIUVER ARROW STONE ;9286437328
Date /& - /#- i/ Gcologlst_Z^_daLS^d^
Pro per lyM;'^ flk&tk Wi'// Project J^aLzr££pr22
County j£d£j_=D<2£? State l/i^h
Drilling r.r. BAyUs As/plo*-*, t)b*\ Jhu unic No
rnv^yitfpn Unit No Sec Twp _ Rge. _
Loco tion Elev.
PAO£ OF
rat re r.o. PROBE i a D.C
T.D. OR ILL /OO.Q
FLUID Lev EL
a-
A REMARKS
guT^a-oe^ Soil Cl_ / i ^hy^j/ SA*cff 2SS as; «8* ES5
tf
VS If M Vr> *S53 3§! m £3£ /O.O 3!SC ass 5S
/2. 9 SEP.
•p m if /7.5
Sit
2% 32 55
2'3 BSC
2§S v v II r 7 S<; 30.6 G3E IS* we 5^ TL SS as? ssar ass" 35. 9«? IS) 37.5 S5 N sag
ft In
£2K r as 5^! iS? m IV) £1 3s
!4ortA
bo or 2LSS 3H •1 1 li 0£
In as £:
K sea
1^
pa m JO a*? 5^
3T i35 5* rA — iS5 38= in Si. 32? r da ESS fiiS (0 14 - J 3jn
3± z- SS
17 S3 S3-
LT
T
St.-;
Six •sc.. S 3£
KA-35 5»i
u::
as MB
as; 2S£
PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION IMAGE
«6-4 TO
1* 2% 3% 5* 7» 19% 20% 2 9% 30% 40% 90%
DQte Gfy?'°gist ^<^olr Dril|ing Co fl^ rXfU^ri^
Property mirMJk&u^ Project g7W* Un i tNa____SeT
County ^^vTtA>>. State vxteW Location uAvb JftteAWuH
Hole No. JjlZihilL
_ Twp. Rge. _
Ele\
PAGE OF J
770. PROBE 'IM'P
111 .5
PYR/TE
ft-
2 v REMARKS
26 2SSS
li
M 5 SO
SIS'-:? Salt 7-5 MB £5 ssas •feu-Sou 85 iii m. Vs Sfa tJtt
124 XV.* Si
Ma/ran is^ KVxl
EH
I*
IS ••J*1 fan 2o.
22?--K;2 f. V.-M-:
*w sh VO IftA 2iS
3 27.5' 27-i
325
X5S 37S
4 ^
1^ 2to
1+ sh
47.5
CSS
3 f2>~-
A:
%1 575"--
eJheA pricks ?>*A t^ai
—^
dim rA
rA F3K UN
A 723 <rrt
rJ 75.0
A. 77.5
-i
i3i
2k 10 >S.=S
4:: <s
' 5
^24
SH;
RrMaK>{ tesin \Q15 -S>^^ ch&ri jptbblCJ ^1
3^ i.5 53^
aw
as
i tl* ill 5^ S3!
iM
, PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION IMAGE •
Dote Geologist L Cft^£6ou Drilling Co. B*jUfi 6kflcr^vA
Propertymt&/k&ffl/ Project AfitrAt Stud* Unit No q
County Siwv T+n\.
Project
Slate tfUh
Unit No.
Location
Ift<~ Hole Ntn -ruJ4~7a
Sec Twp. Rge.
Elev. ~5(^S
PYRITE
V REMARKS
m 2S 8
Snjr-b>cc Soil (to aim
4?t
ah m A Set
K) ITS
*7
u 11 II
fi 2£*
I* in t/tfft/h&fcgl* 6r <g 2.7.5; 10
J7i 5 »!
SK WW
37s
m A. or
1*
^40 I 5
r
in
as
f5
to
•2/
ma
1^ Z» SS
f3 7^5 o-
5 da 77A mm MM
r
*1 ^5 MM
ft
M IS 4% 3 Ntw 3
41 ^
345 M HUH
ri J4b) A IK *W Mi N
Hi*
v5 y
8! MM
i m W3! Svf.
Sis *
*1
b')t$ LT
^1^
PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION IMAGE
Date Geologist.
Property /k5& J?,// PrnjPrt A//fcflt
County Sa^T^A Slate lM*fn
Drilling Cn Basils £*plgra>tpft Int.. Hole Nn Tt04--3Q
Unit No Sec Twp. Rge. _
Location Elev.
PAGE _4 OF i
T.O. P80BE _0l££JlL
T.D. DRILL D1
FLU 10 LEVEL
PYRITE
V REMARKS
SIS! tf 8$ mi 2£ m m Wf3 88 SuwAci. Sou 8 AM
7*5 8 W S3 SAC* K.5: V5 si * SBSS «K5 Si S35 m 'Mi 14*08 r /2, 2kJ
SPVA<, Sfclfc^'ltf. if K to-2 £ MM «
mm r-/7.5
Mi
m 0*^ at 5? Sit*
w OA 31 8*55 25-6—
275 EM 5f.f KB
30.6— mi sm •4 w hs-s /sK 325--
5 S3 35. si?
m "iff
3Z5
HD.O
iS5
TA ft.:-*
^5— SOT WT f4 WW
+A-^—
/fill tiA-btK-rJ S5.0 5wS
r.9 675
If**-* 1.5S/C ^ /> h M 9.0 V7
tA 9m 3 3
in HiiM
aL\t»ju*A. s^err p^lafc fr^s in
^64 - "WW -sr CP 1^ tf,fet*A/ t^iM^ toitH-eJ c>Ke*-T.frt>y ^.5 •5 ,i i« (( cr 75:^— Or Um * : A
iJ 4^ Sv fir —
M mm
TA 3
WW
i ^» M H ~ » 'Hi <]T2 55 /C<\
?A-A1& 55
f.-yj; Bs-r.< TP. g ^.ty 4-VA
•if ^?
TO %w Sis if-.**.; WW! IBS /02S
^11
SB
sssa ass
•m
••S:J*•.,'!
//2.3 SSfS
//s.o m
PI? }20.O— SJSf
^ i?&5
/2l m £S5 8^5
PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION IMAGE
4 r* 2^
25% 5% 20% 30% 50% 10% 40% 7% 15% 1% 2% 3%
Date f-f'2a/3 Geo In gist L /LaSfJioi,r
Property b^i'ife/Visx. rill project
County Tu2,n Slate oft Ah*
Drilling Cn B^Us frpfontfiM C+.
Unit No. Sec.
Location
Hole Nn Tkrf-ZZ.
— Twp. Rge. _
Elev.
PAGE OF PYRITE T.D. PROBE _LL_L^
T.D. DRILL 1175
FLUID LEVEL 41. V
e.fsA^ i-ihs REMARKS
CL.U>}Sd*>d. StMrhci. So\\ CL,f \JU>*- Cl^ K>/Si>*.A) 5.D
7.5
5 ^iSgj Iff
to VM 20.6
In 22.5
25
ok IA Z7S 7>?
30-D
IS? SI* rfpfbft 3-i.S
34
aw) d _ >
IT* 15.0--
r tS5 47J
ttfetl U.ft^ Y<~tte( llf,ir»t & <Zn. h' SO.D
r2.
sec £ SSD
6^3«\ ti7& ^Aj/jAnA. a. 60.0' ^owe C/>6rr . <?.«
6?o
if*. arm 61
ELM ; ta (73
mi 4±t 76
y-tfis/^ T7.f 5^
SI-
VIA)
7*
^3*
I?
SRI
X22
lOOj a*
<^AttnrJ|Qv» )At^£^S&i tt AfprtX. S^tA. rr^*^ pAbblaSaV
m &0 JO?>J>
1*M
zr.iii. KS5 51 'fh 5lj/sh i\cr
si sr >»i>rfeJ"-ShB.k. as
sb m mi
'A f&
Si*
PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION IMAGE