DRC-2015-002544 - 0901a06880530e7b

ENERGYFUELS
DRC-2015-002544
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Blvd. Suite 600
Lakewood, CO, US, 80228
303 974 2140
www.energvfuels.com
May 20, 2015
Sent VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
Mr. Rusty Lundberg
Division of Radiation Control
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144850
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Re: Transmittal of 1st Quarter 2015 Nitrate Monitoring Report
Stipulation and Consent Order Docket Number UGW12-04 White Mesa Uranium Mill
Dear Mr. Lundberg:
Enclosed are two copies of the White Mesa Uranium Mill Nitrate Monitoring Report for the 1st
Quarter of 2015 as required by the Stipulation and Consent Order Docket Number UGW12-04, as well
as two CDs each containing a word searchable electronic copy of the report.
If you should have any questions regarding this report please contact me.
Yours very truly, -
ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC.
Kathy Weinel
Quality Assurance Manager
cc: David C. Frydenlund
Dan Hillsten
Harold R. Roberts
David E. Turk
Scott Bakken
White Mesa U rani urn Mill
Nitrate Monitoring Report
State of Utah
Stipulated Consent Agreement, December 2014
Docket No. UGW12-04
1st Quarter
(January through March)
2015
Prepared by:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Boulevard, Suite 600
Lakewood, CO 80228
May 20,2015
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1
2.0 GROUNDWATER NITRATE MONITORING ................................................ !
2.1 Samples and Measurements Taken During the Quarter ..................................... 1
2.1.1 Nitrate Monitoring ...................................................................................... 2
2.1.2 Parameters Analyzed ................ -................................................................... 3
2.1.3 Groundwater Head and Level Monitoring .................................................. 3
2.2 Sampling Methodology and Equipment and Decontamination Procedures ....... 4
2.2.1 Well Purging, Sampling and Depth to Groundwater .................................. 4
2.2.2 Piezometer Sampling .................................................................................. 5
2.3 Field Data ............................................................................................................ 5
2.4 Depth to Groundwater Data and Water Table Contour Map .............................. 5
2.5 Laboratory Results .............................................................................................. 5
2.5.1 Copy of Laboratory Results ........................................................................ 5
2.5.2 Regulatory Framework ............................................................................... 6
3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND DATA VALIDATION ................................... 6
3.1 Field QC Samples ............................................................................................... 6
3.2 Adherence to Mill Sampling SOPs ..................................................................... 7
3.3 Analyte Completeness Review ............................................................................ 7
3.4 Data Validation ................................................................................................... 7
3.4.1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation .................................................................... 7
3.4.2 Holding Time Evaluation ............................................................................ 8
3.4.3 Analytical Method Checklist ...................................................................... 8
3.4.4 Reporting Limit Evaluation ........................................................................ 9
3.4.5 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates ................................................. 9
3.4.6 Other Laboratory QA/QC ........................................................................... 9
3.4.7 Receipt Temperature Evaluation ............................................................... 10
3.4.8 Rinsate Check ........................................................................................... 10
4.0 INTERPRETATION OF DATA ....................................................................... 10
4.1 Interpretation of Groundwater Levels, Gradients and Flow Directions ........... 10
4.1.1 Current Site Groundwater Contour Map ................................................... 10
4.1.2 Comparison of Current Groundwater Contour Map to Groundwater Contour Map
for Previous Quarter .................................................................................. 14
4.1.3 Hydrographs .............................................................................................. 15
4.1.4 Depth to Groundwater Measured and Groundwater Elevation ................. 15
4.2 Effectiveness of Hydraulic Containment and Capture ...................................... 15
4.2.1 Hydraulic Containment and Control.. ....................................................... 15
4.2.2 Current Nitrate and Chloride Isoconcentration Maps ............................... 18
4.2.3 Comparison of Areal Extent ............................................................................ 18
4.2.4 Nitrate and Chloride Concentration Trend Data and Graphs .................... 19
4.2.5 Interpretation of Analytical Data .............................................................. 19
4.3 Estimation of Pumped Nitrate Mass and Residual Nitrate Mass within the Plume
.......................................................................................................................... 21
5.0 LONG TERM PUMP TEST AT TWN-02, TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-25
OPERATIONS REPORT .................................................................................. 22
5.1 Introduction .......... , ............................................................................................ 22
5.2 Pumping Well Data Collection ......................................................................... 23
5.3 Water Level Measurements .............................................................................. 23
5.4 Pumping Rates and Volumes ............................................................................ 23
5.4.1 TW4-19 ............................................................................................................ 24
5.4.2 TW4-02 ............................................................................................................. 24
6.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT ................................................................. 25
6.1 Assessment of Previous Quarter's Corrective Actions ..................................... 25
7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................ 25
8.0 ELECTRONIC DATA FILES AND FORMAT .............................................. 28
9.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION ........................................................... 29
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Table 5
Table 6
Table 7
Table 8
LIST OF TABLES
Summary of Well Sampling and Constituents for the Period
Nitrate Mass Removal Per Well Per Quarter
Nitrate Well Pumping Rates and Volumes
Qumterly Calculation of Nitrate mass Removed and Total Volume ofWater
Pumped
Nitrate Data Over Time for MW-30, MW-31, MW-5, and MW-11
Slug Test Results
Pre-Pumping Saturated Thickness
Pre-Pumping Hydraulic Gradients and Flow Calculations
11
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
Tab B Order of Sampling and Field Data Worksheets
Tab C Kriged Current Quarter Groundwater Contour Map and Weekly, Monthly and Quarterly
Depth to Water Data
Tab D Kriged Previous Quarter Groundwater Contour Map
Tab E Hydrographs of Groundwater Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab F Depths to Groundwater and Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab G Laboratory Analytical Reports
Tab H Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
H-1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation
H-2 Holding Time Evaluation
H-3 Analytical Method Check
H-4 Reporting Limit Evaluation
H-5 QAJQC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
H-6 QC Control limits for Analysis and Blanks
H-7 Receipt Temperature Evaluation
H-8 Rinsate Evaluation
Tab I Kriged Current Quarter Nitrate and Chloride Isoconcentration Maps
Tab J Analyte Concentration Data Over Time
Tab K Nitrate and Chloride Concentration Trend Graphs
Tab L CSV Transmittal Letter
Tab M Residual Mass Estimate Analysis Figures and Tables
AWAL
CA
CAP
CIR
DIFB
DRC
EFRI
ft amsl
GWDP
LCS
MS
MSD
QA
QAP
QC
RPD
sco
SOPs
UDEQ
voc
ACRONYM LIST
American West Analytical Laboratory
Consent Agreement
Corrective Action Plan
Contamination Investigation Report
Deionized Field Blanks
Utah Division of Radiation Control
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
feet above mean sea level
Groundwater Discharge Permit
Laboratory Control Spike
Matrix Spike
Matrix Spike Duplicate
Quality Assurance
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan
Quality Control
Relative Percent Difference
Stipulated Consent Order
Standard Operating Procedures
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
Volatile Organic Compounds
iv
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Utah Department of Environmental Quality ("UDEQ") Division of Radiation Control
("DRC") noted in a Request dated September 30, 2008 (the "Request"), for a Voluntary Plan and
Schedule to Investigate and Remediate Nitrate Contamination at the White Mesa Uranium Mill
(the "Mill") (the "Plan"), that nitrate levels have exceeded the State water quality standard of 10
mg/L in certain monitoring wells. As a result of the Request, Energy Fuels Resources (USA)
Inc. ("EFRI") entered into a Stipulated Consent Agreement with the Utah Water Quality Board
in January 2009 which directed the preparation of a Nitrate Contamination Investigation Report
("CIR"). A subsequent letter dated December 1, 2009, among other things, recommended that
EFRI also address elevated chloride concentrations in the CIR. The Stipulated Consent
Agreement was amended in August 2011. Under the amended Consent Agreement ("CA"),
EFRI submitted a Corrective Action Plan ("CAP"), pursuant to the requirements of the Utah
Groundwater Quality Protection Rules [UAC R317-6-6.15(C-E)] on November 29, 2011 and
revised versions of the CAP on February 27, 2012 and May 7, 2012. On December 12, 2012,
DRC signed the Stipulation and Consent Order ("SCO"), Docket Number UGW12-04, which
approved the EFRI CAP, dated May 7, 2012. The SCO ordered EFRI to fully implement all
elements of the May 7, 2012 CAP.
Based on the schedule included in the CAP and as delineated and approved by the SCO, the
activities associated with the implementation of the CAP began in January 2013. The reporting
requirements specified in the CAP and SCO are included in this quarterly nitrate report.
This is the Quarterly Nitrate Monitoring Report, as required under the SCO, State of Utah
Docket No. UGW12-04 for the first quarter of 2015. This report meets the requirements of the
SCO, State of UDEQ Docket No. UGW12-04 and is the document which covers nitrate
corrective action and monitoring activities during the first quarter of 2015.
2.0 GROUNDWATER NITRATE MONITORING
2.1 Samples and Measurements Taken During the Quarter
A map showing the location of all groundwater monitoring wells, piezometers, existing wells,
temporary chloroform contaminant investigation wells and temporary nitrate investigation wells
is attached under Tab A. Nitrate samples and measurements taken during this reporting period
are discussed in the remainder of this section.
1
2.1.1 Nitrate Monitoring
Quarterly sampling for nitrate monitoring parameters was performed in the following wells:
TWN-1
TWN-2
TWN-3
TWN-4
TWN-7
TWN-18
TW4-22*
TW4-24*
TW4-25*
Piezometer 1
Piezometer 2
Piezometer 3
As discussed in Section 2.1.2 the analytical constituents required by the CAP are inorganic
chloride and nitrate+nitrite as N (referred to as nitrate in this document)
* Wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25 are chloroform investigation wells (wells installed and
sampled primarily for the chloroform investigation) and are sampled as part of the chloroform
program. The analytical suite for these three wells includes nitrate, chloride and a select list of
Volatile Organic Compounds ("VOCs") as specified in the chloroform program. These three
wells are included here because they are being pumped as part of the remediation of the nitrate
contamination as required by the SCO and the CAP. The nitrate and chloride data are included
in this repmt as well as in the chloroform program quarterly report. The VOC data for these
three wells will be reported in the chloroform quarterly monitoring report only.
The December 12, 2012 SCO approved the CAP, which specified the cessation of sampling in
TWN-5, TWN-6, TWN-8, TWN-9, TWN-10, TWN-11, TWN-12, TWN-13, TWN-14, TWN-15,
TWN-16, TWN-17, and TWN-19. The CAP and SCO also approved the abandonment ofTWN-
5, TWN-8, TWN-9, TWN-10, TWN-11, TWN-12, TWN-13, TWN-15, and TWN-17 within 1
year of the SCO approval. These wells were abandoned in accordance with the DRC-approved
Well Abandonment Procedure on July 31, 2013. Wells TWN-6, TWN-14, TWN-16, and TWN-
19 have been maintained for depth to groundwater monitoring only, as noted in the CAP.
Table 1 provides an overview of all locations sampled during the current period, along with the
date samples were collected from each location, and the date(s) upon which analytical data were
received from the contract laboratory. Table 1 also identifies rinsate samples collected, as well
as sample numbers associated with any required duplicates.
As indicated in Table 1, nitrate monitoring was performed in the nitrate monitoring wells,
chloroform wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25 and Piezometers 1, 2, and 3. Analytical data for
all of the above-listed wells, and the piezometers, are included in Tab G.
Nitrate and chloride are also monitored in all of the Mill's groundwater monitoring wells and
chloroform investigation wells. Data from those wells for this quarter are incorporated in certain
maps and figures in this report but are discussed in their respective programmatic reports.
2
2.1.2 Parameters Analyzed
Locations sampled during this reporting period were analyzed for the following constituents:
• Inorganic Chloride
• Nitrate plus Nitrite as Nitrogen (referred to herein as nitrate)
Use of analytical methods consistent with the requirements found in the White Mesa Mill
Groundwater Quality Assurance Plan, ("QAP") Revision 7.2, dated June 6, 2012 was confirmed
for all analytes, as discussed later in this report.
2.1.3 Groundwater Head and Level Monitoring
Depth to groundwater was measured in the following wells and/or piezometers, pursuant to Part
I.E.3 of the Groundwater Discharge Permit ("GWDP") (dated August 24, 2012):
• The quarterly groundwater compliance monitoring wells
• Existing well MW -4 and all of the temporary chloroform investigation wells
• Piezometers-P-1, P-2, P-3, P-4 and P-5
• MW-20, MW-22, and MW-34
• The DR piezometers that were installed during the Southwest Hydrogeologic
Investigation
• Nitrate wells TWN-1, TWN-2, TWN-3, TWN-4, TWN-6, TWN-7, TWN-14, TWN-16,
TWN-18 and TWN-19
In addition to the above, depth to water measurements are routinely observed in conjunction with
sampling events for all wells sampled during quarterly and accelerated efforts, regardless of the
sampling purpose.
All well levels used for groundwater contour mapping were measured and recorded within 5
calendar days of each other as indicated by the measurement dates in the summary sheet under
Tab C. Field data sheets for groundwater measurements are also provided in Tab C.
Weekly and monthly depth to groundwater measurements were taken in the chloroform pumping
wells MW-4, MW-26, TW4-19, TW4-20, TW4-4, TW4-01, TW4-02, and TW4-11, and the
nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2. The UDEQ Groundwater
Corrective Action Plan for Chloroform Plume Remediation (the "GCAP") dated December 18,
2014 and awaiting final approval, requires that chloroform monitoring wells TW4-01, TW4-02,
and TW4-11 be converted to pumping wells. In anticipation of final approval of the GCAP,
EFRI converted TW 4-01, TW 4-02, and TW 4-11 to pumping wells and began pumping on
January 14, 2015.
In addition, monthly water level measurements were taken in non-pumping wells MW-27, MW-
30, MW-31, TW4-21, TWN-1, TWN-3, TWN-4, TWN-7, and TWN-18 as required by the CAP.
3
2.2 Sampling Methodology and Equipment and Decontamination Procedures
The QAP provides a detailed presentation of procedures utilized for groundwater sampling
activities under the GWDP (August 24, 2012).
The sampling methodology, equipment and decontamination procedures that were performed for
the nitrate contaminant investigation, as summarized below, are consistent with the QAP.
2.2.1 Well Purging, Sampling and Depth to Groundwater
A list of the wells in order of increasing nitrate contamination is generated quarterly. The order
for purging is thus established. The list is included with the Field Data Worksheets under Tab B.
Mill personnel start purging with all of the nondetect wells and then move to the wells with
detectable nitrate concentrations, progressing from the wells having the lowest nitrate
contamination to wells with the highest nitrate contamination.
Before leaving the Mill office, the pump and hose are decontaminated using the cleaning agents
described in Attachment 2-2 of the QAP. Rinsate blanks are collected at a frequency of one
rinsate per 20 field samples.
Purging is completed to remove stagnant water from the casing and to assure that representative
samples of formation water are collected for analysis. There are three purging strategies
specified in the QAP that are used to remove stagnant water from the casing during groundwater
sampling at the Mill. The three strategies are as follows:
1. Purging three well casing volumes with a single measurement of field parameters
2. Purging two casing volumes with stable field parameters (within 10% Relative Percent
Difference ["RPD"])
3. Purging a well to dryness and stability (within 10% RPD) of a limited list of field parameters
after recovery.
Mill personnel proceed to the first well, which is the well with the lowest concentration (i.e. non-
dectect) of nitrate based on the previous quarter's sampling results. Well depth measurements
are taken and the one casing volume is calculated. The purging strategy that will be used for the
well is determined at this time based on the depth to water measurement and the previous
production of the well. The Grundfos pump (a 6 to 10 gallon per minute [gpm] pump) is then
lowered to the appropriate depth in the well and purging is started. At the first well, the purge
rate is measured for the purging event by using a calibrated 5 gallon bucket. After the
evacuation of the well has been completed, the well is sampled when possible, and the pump is
removed from the well and the process is repeated at each well location moving from the least
contaminated to most contaminated well. If sample collection is not possible due to the well
being purged dry, a sample is collected after recovery using a disposable bailer and as described
in Attachment 2-3 of the QAP. Sample collection follows the procedures described in
Attachment 2-4 of the QAP.
4
After the samples have been collected for a patticular well, the samples are placed into a cooler
that contains ice. The well is then recapped and Mill personnel proceed to the next well. If a
bailer has been used it is disposed of.
Decontamination of non-dedicated equipment, using the reagents in Attachment 2-2 of the QAP,
is performed between each sample location, and at the beginning of each sampling day, in
addition to the pre-event decontamination described above.
2.2.2 Piezometer Sampling
Samples are collected from Piezometers 1, 2 and 3, if possible. Samples are collected from
piezometers using a disposable bailer after one set of field measurements have been collected.
Due to the difficulty in obtaining samples from the piezometers, the purging protocols set out in
the QAP are not followed.
After samples are collected, the bailer is disposed of and samples are placed into a cooler
containing ice for sample preservation and transit to the Mill's contract analytical laboratory,
American West Analytical Laboratories ("AWAL").
2.3 Field Data
Attached under Tab B are copies of all Field Data Worksheets that were completed during the
quarter for the nitrate investigation monitoring wells and piezometers identified in Section 2.1.1
and Table 1.
2.4 Depth to Groundwater Data and Water Table Contour Map
Depth-to-groundwater measurements that were utilized for groundwater contours are included on
the Quarterly Depth to Water Sheet at Tab C of this Report along with the kriged groundwater
contour map for the current quarter generated from this data. All well levels used for
groundwater contour mapping were measured and recorded within 5 calendar days of each other
as indicated by the measurement dates in the summary sheet under Tab C. A copy of the kriged
groundwater contour map generated from the previous quarter's data is provided under Tab D.
2.5 Laboratory Results
2.5.1 Copy of Laboratory Results
The analytical results were provided by AW AL. Table 1 lists the dates when analytical results
were reported to the Quality Assurance ("QA") Manager for each well or other sample.
Analytical results for the samples collected for this quarter's nitrate investigation and a limited
list of chloroform investigation nitrate and chloride results are provided under Tab G of this
Report. AI. o includ~d under Tab G are the results of analyses for duplicate samples and rinsate
arnples for thls sampling effo1t, identified in Table 1. See the Groundwater Monitoring
Report and Chloroform Monit01ing Report for this quarter for nitrate and chloroform analytical
re. ult for the groundwater monitori_og well and chloroform investigation wells not listed in
Table 1.
5
2.5.2 Regulatory Framework
As discussed in Section 1.0 above, the Request, Plan, and CA each triggered a series of actions
on EFRI' s part. Potential surficial sources of nitrate and chloride have been described in the
December 30, 2009 CIR and additional investigations into potential sources were completed and
discussed with DRC in 2011. Pursuant to theCA, the CAP was submitted to the Director of the
Division of Radiation Control (the "Director") on May 7, 2012. The CAP describes activities
associated with the nitrate in groundwater. The CAP was approved by the Director on December
12, 2012. This quarterly report documents the monitoring consistent with the program described
in the CAP.
3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCEANDDATA VALIDATION
EFRI's QA Manager performed a QA/Quality Control ("QC") review to confirm compliance of
the monitoring program with the requirements of the QAP. As required in the QAP, data QA
includes preparation and analysis of QC samples in the field, review of field procedures, an
analyte completeness review, and QC review of laboratory data methods and data. Identification
of field QC samples collected and analyzed is provided in Section 3 .1. Discussion of adherence
to Mill sampling Standard Operating Procedures ("SOPs") is provided in Section 3.2. Analytical
completeness review results are provided in Section 3.3. The steps and tests applied to check
field data QA/QC, holding times, receipt temperature and laboratory data QA/QC are discussed
in Sections 3.4.1 through 3.4.7 below.
The analytical laboratory has provided summary reports of the analytical QA/QC measurements
necessary to maintain conformance with National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation
Conference certification and reporting protocol. The Analytical Laboratory QA/QC Summary
Reports, including copies of the Mill's Chain of Custody and Analytical Request Record forms
for each set of Analytical Results, follow the analytical results under Tab G. Results of the
review of the laboratory QA/QC information are provided under Tab H and discussed in Section
3.4, below.
3.1 Field QC Samples
The following QC samples were generated by Mill personnel and submitted to the analytical
laboratory in order to assess the quality of data resulting from the field sampling program.
Field QC samples for the nitrate investigation program consist of one field duplicate sample for
each 20 samples, DI Field Blanks ("DIFB"), and equipment rinsate samples.
During the quarter, one duplicate sample was collected as indicated in Table 1. The duplicate
was sent blind to the analytical laboratory and analyzed for the same parameters as the nitrate
wells.
One rinsate blank sample was collected as indicated on Table 1. Rinsate samples are labeled
with the name of the subsequently purged well with a terminal letter "R" added (e.g. TWN-7R).
The field QC sample results are included with the routine analyses under Tab G.
6
3.2 Adherence to Mill Sampling SOPs
The QA Manager review of Mill Personnel's adherence to the existing SOPs, confirmed that the
QNQC requirements established in the QAP and Chloroform QAP were met.
3.3 Analyte Completeness Review
All analyses required by the GWDP for nitrate monitoring for the period were performed.
3.4 Data Validation
The QAP and GWDP (August 24, 2012) identify the data validation steps and data QC checks
required for the nitrate monitoring program. Consistent with these requirements, the QA
Manager performed the following evaluations: a field data QNQC evaluation, a holding time
evaluation, an analytical method check, a reporting limit evaluation, a QC evaluation of sample
duplicates, a QC evaluation of control limits for analysis and blanks, a receipt temperature
evaluation, and a rinsate evaluation. Because no VOCs are analyzed for the nitrate
contamination investigation, no trip blanks are required in the sampling program. Each
evaluation is discussed in the following sections. Data check tables indicating the results of each
test are provided under Tab H.
3.4.1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation
The QA Manager performs a review of all field recorded parameters to assess their adherence
with QAP requirements. The assessment involved review of two sources of information: the
Field Data Sheets and the Quarterly Depth to Water summary sheet. Review of the Field Data
Sheets addresses well purging volumes and stability of five parameters: conductance, pH,
temperature, redox potential, and turbidity. Review of the Depth to Water data confirms that all
depth measurements used for development of groundwater contour maps were conducted within
a five-day period of each other. The results of this quarter's review are provided under Tab H.
Based upon the review of the field data sheets, field work conformed with the QAP purging and
field measurement requirements. A summary of the purging techniques employed and field
measurements taken is described below:
Purging Two Ca ing Volumes with Stable Field Parameter. Cwilhin 10% RPD)
Wells TWN-01, TWN-04, and TWN-18 were sampled after two casing volumes were removed.
Field parameters pH, specific conductivity, turbidity, water temperature, and redox potential
were measured during purging. All field parameters for this requirement were stable within 10%
RPD.
Purgin!! a Welllo Dryo·e sand lability of a Limited List of Field Param ter ·
Wells TWN-03 and TWN-07 were purged to dryness before two casing volumes were evacuated.
After well recovery, one set of measurements for the field parameters of pH, specific
conductivity, and water temperature only were taken; the samples were collected, and another set
of measurements for pH, specific conductivity, and water temperature were taken. Stabilization
7
of pH, conductivity and temperature are required within 10% RPD under the QAP. All field
parameters for this requirement were stable within 10% RPD.
Continuously Pumped Wells
Wells TWN-02, TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-25 are continuously pumped wells. These wells are
pumped on a set schedule per the remediation plan and are considered sufficiently evacuated to
immediately collect a sample. As previously noted, TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-25 are
chloroform investigation wells and are sampled under the chloroform program. Data for nitrate
and chloride are provided here for completeness purposes.
During review of the field data sheets, it was observed that sampling personnel consistently
recorded depth to water to the nearest 0.01 foot.
All field parameters for all wells were within the QAP required limits, as indicated below.
The review of the field sheets for compliance with QAP requirements resulted in the
observations noted below. The QAP requirements in Attachment 2-3 specifically state that field
parameters must be stabilized to within 10% over at least 2 consecutive measurements for wells
purged to two casing volumes or to dryness. The QAP Attachment 2-3 states that turbidity
should be less than 5 NTU prior to sampling unless the well is characterized by water that has a
higher turbidity. The QAP Attachment 2-3 does not require that turbidity measurements be less
than 5 NTU prior to sampling. As such the noted observations regarding turbidity measurements
greater than 5 NTU below are included for information purposes only.
• All well measurements met the QAP's 5 NTU turbidity goal and all required turbidity
RPD's met the QAP Requirement to stabilize within 10%, as noted in Tab H.
EFRI's letter to DRC of March 26, 2010 discusses further why turbidity does not appear to be an
appropriate parameter for assessing well stabilization. In response to DRC' s subsequent
correspondence dated June 1, 2010 and June 24, 2010, EFRI completed a monitoring well
redevelopment program. The redevelopment report was submitted to DRC on September 30,
2011. DRC responded to the redevelopment report via letter on November 15, 2012. Per the
DRC letter dated November 15, 2012, the field data generated this quarter are compliant with the
turbidity requirements of the approved QAP.
3.4.2 Holding Time Evaluation
QAP Table 1 identifies the method holding times for each suite of parameters. Sample holding
time checks are provided in Tab H. All samples were received and analyzed within the required
holding time.
3.4.3 Analytical Method Checklist
All analytical methods reported by the laboratory were checked against the required methods
enumerated in the QAP. Analytical method checks are provided in Tab H. All methods were
consistent with the requirements of the QAP.
8
3.4.4 Reporting Limit Evaluation
All analytical method reporting limits ("RLs") reported by the laboratory were checked against
the reporting limits enumerated in the QAP. Reporting Limit Checks are provided in Tab H. All
analytes were measured and reported to the required reporting limits, with the exception of
several samples that had increased reporting limits due to matrix interference or required dilution
due to the sample concentration. However, in all of those cases the analytical results were
greater than the reporting limit used.
3.4.5 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
Section 9.1.4 a) of the QAP states that RPDs will be calculated for the comparison of duplicate
and original field samples. The QAP acceptance limits for RPDs between the duplicate and
original field sample is less than or equal to 20% unless the measured results are less than 5
times the required detection limit. This standard is based on the EPA Contract Laboratory
Program National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review, February 1994, 9240.1-05-
01 as cited in the QAP. The RPDs are calculated for duplicate pairs for all analytes regardless of
whether or not the reported concentrations are greater than 5 times the required detection limits.
However, data will be considered noncompliant only when the results are greater than 5 times
the required detection limit and the RPD is greater than 20%.
The duplicate results were within a 20% RPD. Results of the RPD test are provided in Tab H.
3.4.6 Other Laboratory QA/QC
Section 9.2 of the QAP requires that the laboratory's QNQC Manager check the following items
in developing data reports: (1) sample preparation information is correct and complete, (2)
analysis information is conect and complete, (3) appropriate Analytical Laboratory procedures
are followed, (4) analytical results are conect and complete, (5) QC samples are within
established control limits, (6) blanks are within QC limits, (7) special sample preparation and
analytical requirements have been met, and (8) documentation is complete. In addition to other
laboratory checks described above, EFRI's QA Manager rechecks QC samples and blanks (items
(5) and (6)) to confirm that the percent recovery for spikes and the relative percent difference for
spike duplicates are within the method-specific required limits, or that the case narrative
sufficiently explains any deviation from these limits. Results of this quantitative check are
provided in Tab H.
The lab QNQC results met these specified acceptance limits.
The QAP Section 8.1.2 requires that a Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate ("MS/MSD") pair
be analyzed with each analytical batch. The QAP does not specify acceptance limits for the
MS/MSD pair, and the QAP does not specify that the MS/MSD pair be prepared on EFRI
samples only. Acceptance limits for MS/MSDs are set by the laboratories. The review of the
information provided by the laboratories in the data packages verified that the QAP requirement
to analyze an MS/MSD pair with each analytical batch was met. While the QAP does not require
it, the recoveries were reviewed for compliance with the laboratory established acceptance limits.
The QAP does not require this level of review, and the results of this review are provided for
information only.
9
The information from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports indicates that the MS/MSDs
recoveries and the associated RPDs for the samples were within acceptable laboratory limits for
the regulated compounds except as indicated in Tab H. The MS/MSD recoveries that are outside
the laboratory established acceptance limits do not affect the quality or usability of the data
because recoveries above or below the acceptance limits are indicative of matrix interference.
Matrix interferences are applicable to the individual sample results only. The requirement in the
QAP to analyze a MS/MSD pair with each analytical batch was met and as such the data are
compliant with the QAP.
The information from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports indicates that the Laboratory
Control Sample recoveries were acceptable, which indicate that the analytical system was
operating properly.
The QAP Section 8.1.2 requires that each analytical batch shall be accompanied by a reagent
blank. All analytical batches routinely contain a blank, which is a laboratory-grade water blank
sample made and can·ied through all analytical steps. For the Mill samples, a method blank is
prepared for all analytical methods. The information from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary
Reports indicates that the method blanks did not contain detections of any target analytes above
the Reporting Limit.
3.4.7 Receipt Temperature Evaluation
Chain of Custody sheets were reviewed to confirm compliance with the QAP requirement in
QAP Table 1 that samples be received at 6°C or lower. Sample temperatures checks are
provided in Tab H. All samples were received within the required temperature limit.
3.4.8 Rinsate Check
Rinsate checks are provided in Tab H. A comparison of the rinsate blank sample concentration
levels to the QAP requirements -that rinsate sample concentrations be one order of magnitude
lower than that of the actual well -indicated that all of the rinsate blank analytes met this
criterion. All rinsate and DIFB blank samples were non-detect for the quarter.
4.0 INTERPRETATIONOFDATA
4.1 Interpretation of Groundwater Levels, Gradients and Flow Directions.
4.1.1 Current Site Groundwater Contour Map
As stated above, a listing of groundwater level readings for the current quarter (shown as depth
to groundwater in feet) is included under Tab C. The data from this tab has been interpreted
(interpolated by kriging) and plotted in a water table contour map, provided under the same tab.
The contour map is based on the current quarter's data for all wells.
The water level contour map indicates that perched water flow ranges from generally
southwesterly beneath the Mill site and tailings cells to generally southerly along the eastern and
western margins of White Mesa. Perched water mounding associated with the wildlife ponds
10
locally changes the generally southerly perched water flow patterns. For example, northeast of
the Mill site, mounding associated with wildlife ponds results in locally northerly flow near
PIEZ-1. The impact of the mounding associated with the northern ponds, to which water has not
been delivered since March 2012, is diminishing and is expected to continue to diminish as the
mound decays due to reduced recharge.
Not only has recharge from the wildlife ponds impacted perched water elevations and flow
directions at the site, but the cessation of water delivery to the northern ponds, which are
generally upgradient of the nitrate and chloroform plumes at the site, has resulted in changing
conditions that are expected to impact constituent concentrations and migration rates within the
plumes. Specifically, past recharge from the ponds has helped limit many constituent
concentrations within the plumes by dilution while the associated groundwater mounding has
increased hydraulic gradients and contributed to plume migration. Since use of the northern
wildlife ponds ceased in March 2012, the reduction in recharge and decay of the associated
groundwater mound are expected to increase many constituent concentrations within the plumes
while reducing hydraulic gradients and acting to reduce rates of plume migration. EFRI and its
consultants have raised the issues and potential effects associated with cessation of water
delivery to the northern wildlife ponds during discussions with DRC in March 2012 and May
2013.
The impacts associated with cessation of water delivery to the northern ponds are expected to
propagate downgradient (south and southwest) over time. Wells close to the ponds are generally
expected to be impacted sooner than wells farther downgradient of the ponds. Therefore,
constituent concentrations are generally expected to increase in downgradient wells close to the
ponds before increases are detected in wells farther downgradient of the ponds. Although such
increases are anticipated to result from reduced dilution, the magnitude and timing of the
increases are difficult to predict due to the complex permeability distribution at the site and
factors such as pumping and the rate of decay of the groundwater mound. The potential exists for
some wells completed in higher permeability materials to be impacted sooner than some wells
completed in lower permeability materials even though the wells completed in lower
permeability materials may be closer to the ponds.
Localized increases in concentrations of constituents such as nitrate and chloride within and near
the nitrate plume may occur even when the nitrate plume is under control based on the Nitrate
CAP requirements. Ongoing mechanisms that can be expected to increase the concentrations of
nitrate and chloride locally as a result of reduced wildlife pond recharge include but are not
limited to:
1) Reduced dilution -the m1xmg of low constituent concentration pond recharge into
existing perched groundwater will be reduced over time.
2) Reduced saturated thicknesses -dewatering of higher permeability zones rece1vmg
primarily low constituent concentration pond water will result in wells intercepting the
zones receiving a smaller proportion of the low constituent concentration water.
The combined impact of the above two mechanisms may be especially evident at chloroform
pumping wells MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19, and TW4-20; nitrate pumping wells TW4-22,
TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2; and non-pumped wells adjacent to the pumped wells. The
11
overall impact is expected to be generally higher constituent concentrations in these wells over
the short term until mass reduction resulting from pumping and natural attenuation eventually
reduce concentrations.
In addition to changes in the flow regime caused by reduced wildlife pond recharge, perched
flow directions are locally influenced by operation of the chloroform and nitrate pumping wells.
As shown in the detail water level map provided under Tab C, well defined cones of depression
are evident in the vicinity of all chloroform pumping wells except TW4-4, which began pumping
in the first quarter of 2010. Although operation of chloroform pumping well TW4-4 has
depressed the water table in the vicinity of TW4-4, a well-defined cone of depression is not
clearly evident. The lack of a well-defined cone of depression near TW4-4 likely results from 1)
variable permeability conditions in the vicinity of TW4-4, and 2) persistent relatively low water
levels at adjacent well TW4-14.
Wells TW4-1, TW4-2, and TW4-11 were added to the chloroform pumping network this quarter,
and have lowered water levels east of the nitrate plume in the general vicinity of chloroform
pumping well MW -4. Decreases in water levels were especially evident at non-pumping wells
TW4-7 and TW4-8.
Pumping of nitrate wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 began during the first quarter
of 2013. Water level patterns near these wells are expected to be influenced by the presence of
and the decay of the groundwater mound associated with the northern wildlife ponds, and by the
persistently low water level elevation at TWN-7, which is located up gradient of the nitrate
pumping wells.
Capture associated with nitrate pumping is expected to increase over time as water levels decline
due to pumping and to cessation of water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds. Interaction
between nitrate and chloroform pumping is expected to enhance the capture of the nitrate
pumping system. The long term interaction between the nitrate and chloroform pumping systems
will, however, require more data to be collected as part of routine monitoring.
As discussed above, variable permeability conditions are one likely reason for the lack of a well-
defined cone of depression near chloroform pumping well TW4-4. Changes in water levels at
wells immediately south of TW4-4 resulting from TW4-4 pumping are expected to be muted
because TW4-4 is located at a transition from relatively high to relatively low permeability
conditions south (downgradient) of TW4-4. The permeability of the perched zone at TW4-6 and
TW4-26, and recently installed wells TW4-29, TW4-30, TW4-31, TW4-33, TW4-34, and TW4-
35 is one to two orders of magnitude lower than at TW4-4. Any drawdown of water levels at
wells immediately south of TW4-4 resulting from TW4-4 pumping is also difficult to determine
because of the general, long-term increase in water levels in this area that resulted from wildlife
pond recharge.
Water levels at TW4-4 and TW4-6 increased by nearly 2.7 and 2.9 feet, respectively, between
the fourth quarter of 2007 and the fourth quarter of 2009 (just prior to the start of TW 4-4
pumping) at rates of approximately 1.2 feet/year and 1.3 feet/year, respectively. However, the
rate of increase in water level at TW4-6 after the start of pumping at TW4-4 (first quarter of
2010) was reduced to less than 0.5 feet/year suggesting that TW4-6 is within the hydraulic
12
influence of TW 4-4. Furthermore, water levels at TW 4-6 have been trending downward since the
fourth quarter of 20 13 suggesting an additional influence related to the cessation of water
delivery to the northern wildlife ponds as discussed above. (note: hydrographs for these wells are
provided in the quarterly Cbl rofonn Moni toring Report). Rccharg from the southern wildlife
pond is expe ted l continue to have an ffect on ater level near TW 4-4 even as the
groundwater mound as ·o iated with recharge from lhe norlhern ponds diminishes over time due
to cessation of water delivery to those ponds.
The lack of a well-defined cone of depression at TW4-4 is also influenced by the persistent,
relatively low water level at non-pumping well TW4-14, located east ofTW4-4 and TW4-6. For
the current quarter, the water level at TW4-14 was measured at approximately 5530.9 feet above
mean sea level ("ft amsl"). This is approximately 7 feet lower than the water level at TW 4-6
(approximately 5538.0 ft amsl) and 11 feet lower than the water level at TW4-4 (approximately
5541.5 ft amsl) even though TW4-4 is pumping.
Well TW4-27 (installed south of TW4-14 in the fourth quarter of 2011) has a static water level
of approximately 5527.7 ft amsl, similar to TW4-14 (approximately 5530.9 ft amsl). Prior to the
installation of TW4-27, the persistently low water level at TW4-14 was considered anomalous
because it appeared to be downgradient of all three wells TW4-4, TW4-6, and TW4-26, yet
chloroform had not been detected at TW4-14. Chloroform had apparently migrated from TW4-4
to TW4-6 and from TW4-6 to TW4-26 which suggested that TW4-26 was actually downgradient
of TW4-6, and TW4-6 was actually downgradient of TW4-4, regardless of the flow direction
implied by the low water level at TW4-14. The water level at TW4-26 (5536.4 feet amsl) is,
however, lower than water levels at adjacent wells TW4-6 (5538.0 feet amsl), and TW4-23
(5539.5 feet amsl), as shown in the detail water level map under Tab C.
Hydraulic tests indicate that the permeability at TW4-27 is an order of magnitude lower than at
TW4-6 and three orders of magnitude lower than at TW4-4 (see Hydro Geo Chern, Inc. [HGC],
September 20, 2010: Hydraulic Testing of TW4-4, TW4-6, and TW4-26, White Mesa Uranium
Mill, July 2010; and HGC, November 28, 2011: Installation, Hydraulic Testing, and Perched
Zone Hydrogeology of Perched Monitoring Well TW4-27, White Mesa Uranium Mill Near
Blanding, Utah). The similar water levels at TW4-14 and TW4-27, and the low permeability
estimate at TW4-27 suggest that both wells are completed in materials having lower permeability
than nearby wells. The low permeability condition likely reduced the rate of long-term water
level increase at TW4-14 and TW4-27 compared to nearby wells, yielding water levels that
appeared anomalously low. This behavior is consistent with hydrauli t l data c llected from
recently installed wells TW4-29, TW4-30, TW4-31, TW4-33 and TW4-34 which indicate that
the permeability of these wells is one to two orders of magnitude higher Lhan the permeability of
TW4-27 (see HGC, January 23, 2014; Contamination Investigation Report, TW4-12 and TW4-
27 Areas, White Mesa Uranium Mill Near Blanding, Utah; and HGC, July 1, 2014, Installation
and Hydraulic Testing of TW4-35 and TW4-36, White Mesa Uranium Mill Near Blanding, Utah
[As-Built Report]). Hydraulic tests also indicate that the permeability at TW4-36 is slightly
higher than but comparable to the low permeability at TW4-27, suggesting that TW4-36, TW4-
14 and TW4-27 are completed in a continuous low permeability zone.
13
4.1.2 Comparison of Current Groundwater Contour Map to Groundwater Contour Map
for Previous Quarter
The groundwater contour maps for the Mill site for the previous quarter, as submitted with the
Nitrate Monitoring Report for the previous quarter, are attached under Tab D.
A comparison of the water table contour maps for the current quarter (first quarter of 2015) to
the water table contour maps for the previous quarter (fourth quarter of 2014) indicates relatively
large draw downs (decreases in water levels) associated with operation of new chloroform
pumping wells TW 4-1, TW 4-2, and TW 4-11. Smaller increases in draw down occun·ed at nearby
chloroform pumping wells MW-4 and TW4-4. Drawdowns associated with chloroform pumping
wells TW4-19 and TW4-20 decreased this quarter.
Nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 were brought into operation
during the first quarter of 2013 and their impact on water level patterns was evident as of the
fourth quarter of 2013. While water levels in nitrate pumping well TW4-22 showed a decrease,
the water levels at TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 showed increases this quarter.
As discussed in Section 4.1.1, pumping at chloroform well TW 4-4, which began in the first
quarter of 2010, has depressed the water table near TW 4-4, but a well-defined cone of depression
is not clearly evident, likely due to variable permeability conditions near TW4-4 and the
persistently low water level at adjacent well TW4-14.
Small ( <1 foot) changes in water levels were reported at the majority of site wells; water levels
and water level contours for the site have not changed significantly since the last quarter except
for a few locations primarily in the vicinity of the new chloroform pumping wells. Reported
decreases in water levels (increases in drawdown) of approximately 4.2, 7.1, 2.2, 31, and 12 feet
occurred in chloroform pumping wells TW4-1, TW4-2, TW4-4, and TW4-11, and nitrate
pumping well TW4-22, respectively. Increases in water level (decreases in drawdown) of
approximately 6.9, 5, 6.3, and 6.3 feet were reported for chloroform pumping wells MW-26,
TW4-19, TW4-20, and nitrate pumping well TW4-25, respectively. Changes in water levels at
other pumping wells (chloroform pumping well MW-4 and nitrate pumping well TW4-24) were
less than 1 foot. Water level fluctuations at pumping wells typically occur in part because of
fluctuations in pumping conditions just prior to and at the time the measurements are taken.
Although increases in water levels (decreases in drawdown) occurred in some pumping wells
and decreases in water levels (increases in drawdown) occurred in others, and new chloroform
pumping wells TW4-1, TW4-2, and TW4-11 were brought online, the overall apparent capture
of the combined system is about the same as last quarter.
Reported water level decreases of less than 1 foot at Piezometers 1 through 3, TWN-1, TWN-4,
TWN-6, TWN-18, and MW-19 may result from cessation of water delivery to the northern
wildlife ponds as discussed in Section 4.1.1 and the consequent continuing decay of the
associated perched water mound. Reported water level decreases of approximately 1.2 feet and
1.4 feet at Piezometers 4 and 5, respectively, may result from reduced recharge at the southern
wildlife pond.
14
Reported water levels increased by approximately 4.3 feet at MW-20 and by approximately 2.5
feet at MW-37 between the previous quarter and the current quarter. Water level variability at
these wells is likely the result of low permeability and variable intervals between
purging/sampling and water level measurement. An increase in water level of approximately 2.9
feet was reported at DR-17; a similar decrease was reported last quarter. Water level decreases of
approximately 4 feet and 8 feet at TW4-7 and TW4-8, respectively, are likely the result of the
start -up of pumping at TW 4-1, TW 4-2, and TW 4-11.
4.1.3 Hydrographs
Attached under Tab E are hydrographs showing groundwater elevation in each nitrate
contaminant investigation monitor well over time. Per the CAP, nitrate wells TWN-6, TWN-14,
TWN-16, and TWN-19 have been maintained for depth to groundwater monitoring only. These
hydrographs are also included in Tab E.
4.1.4 Depth to Groundwater Measured and Groundwater Elevation
Attached in Tab F are tables showing depth to groundwater measured and groundwater elevation
over time for each of the wells listed in Section 2.1.1 above.
4.2 Effectiveness of Hydraulic Containment and Capture
4.2.1 Hydraulic Containment and Control
The CAP states that hydraulic containment and control will be evaluated in part based on water
level data and in part on concentrations in wells downgradient of pumping wells TW4-22 and
TW4-24.
As per the CAP, the fourth quarter of 2013 was the first quarter that hydraulic capture associated
with nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 was evaluated. Hydraulic
containment and control based on water level data is considered successful per the CAP if the
entire nitrate plume upgradient of TW4-22 and TW4-24 falls within the combined capture of the
nitrate pumping wells. Capture zones based on water level contours calculated by kriging the
current quarter's water level data are provided on water level contour maps included under Tab
C. The nitrate capture zones are defined by the bounding stream tubes associated with nitrate
pumping wells. Each bounding stream tube represents a flow line parallel to the hydraulic
gradient and therefore perpendicular to the intersected water level contours. Assuming that the
stream tubes do not change over time, all flow between the bounding stream tubes associated
with a particular pumping well is presumed to eventually reach and be removed by that well.
Capture associated with chloroform pumping wells is also included on these maps because the
influence of the chloroform and nitrate pumping systems overlap.
The specific methodology for calculating the nitrate capture zones is substantially the same as
that used since the fourth quarter of 2005 to calculate the capture zones for the chloroform
program, as agreed to by the DRC and International Uranium (USA) Corp. The procedure for
calculating nitrate capture zones is as follows:
15
1) Calculate water level contours by gridding the water level data on approximately 50-foot
centers using the ordinary linear kriging method in Surfer™. Default kriging parameters
are used that include a linear variogram, an isotropic data search, and all the available
water level data for the quarter, including relevant seep and spring elevations.
2) Calculate the capture zones by hand from the kriged water level contours following the
rules for flow nets:
-from each pumping well, reverse track the stream tubes that bound the capture zone of
each well,
-maintain perpendicularity between each stream tube and the kriged water level
contours.
Compared to last quarter, both increases and decreases in water levels occurred at nitrate and
chloroform pumping wells. The water level in nitrate pumping well TW4-22 decreased by nearly
12 feet. Water levels in nitrate pumping wells TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 increased by
approximately 1 foot, 6 feet, and 4 feet, respectively. The water levels in chloroform pumping
wells MW-4, TW4-1, TW4-2, TW4-4, and TW4-11 decreased by approximately 1 foot, 4 feet, 7
feet, 2 feet, and 31 feet, respectively, while water levels in chloroform pumping wells MW -26,
TW4-19, and TW4-20 increased by approximately 7 feet, 5 feet, and 6 feet, respectively. While
the apparent capture of the combined pumping systems has expanded in some areas and been
reduced in others, the overall capture is about the same as last quarter.
The capture associated with nitrate pumping wells is expected to increase over time as water
levels continue to decline due to pumping and to cessation of water delivery to the northern
wildlife ponds. Slow development of hydraulic capture is consistent with and expected based on
the relatively low permeability of the perched zone at the site. Furthermore, the presence of the
perched groundwater mound, and the apparently anomalously low water level at TWN-7, will
influence the definition of capture associated with the nitrate pumping system.
That pumping is likely sufficient to eventually capture the entire plume upgradient of TW4-22
and TW4-24 can be demonstrated by comparing the combined average pumping rates of all
nitrate pumping wells for the current quarter to estimates of pre-pumping flow through the nitrate
plume near the locations of TW4-22 and TW4-24. The pre-pumping flow calculation is assumed
to represent a steady state 'background' condition that includes constant recharge, hydraulic
gradients, and saturated thicknesses, and does not account for reduced recharge and saturated
thickness caused by cessation of water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds since March, 2012.
Changes after pumping are conservatively assumed to result only from pumping. As will be
discussed below, the average combined nitrate pumping rate for the quarter is within the
calculated pre-pumping range of perched water flow through the nitrate plume.
The cumulative volume of water removed by TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 during
the current quarter was approximately 233,211 gallons. This equates to an average total
extraction rate of approximately 1.8 gpm over the 90 day quarter. This average accounts for time
periods when pumps were off due to insufficient water columns in the wells and accounts for the
extended pumping outage discussed in Section 5. In part due to this outage, the volume of water
removed by nitrate pumping was approximately 33% lower than last quarter. In addition to
periodic outages resulting from unavoidable equipment downtime, achievable pumping rates are
16
likely to diminish over time as saturated thicknesses are reduced by pumping and by cessation of
water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds.
Pre-pumping flow through the nitrate plume near TW4-22 and TW4-24 was estimated using
Darcy's Law to lie within a range of approximately 1.31 gpm to 2.79 gpm. Calculations were
based on an average hydraulic conductivity range of 0.15 feet per day (ft/day) to 0.32 ft/day
(depending on the calculation method), a pre-pumping hydraulic gradient of 0.025 feet per foot
(ftlft), a plume width of 1,200 feet, and a saturated thickness (at TW4-22 and TW4-24) of 56
feet. The hydraulic conductivity range was estimated by averaging the results obtained from slug
test data that were collected automatically by data loggers from wells within the plume and
analyzed using the KGS unconfined slug test solution available in Aqtesolve™ (see Hydro Geo
Chern, Inc. [HGC], August 3, 2005: Perched Monitoring Well Installation and Testing at the
White Mesa Uranium Mill, April Through June 2005; HGC, March 10, 2009: Perched Nitrate
Monitoring Well Installation and Hydraulic Testing, White Mesa Uranium Mill; and HGC,
March 17 2009: Letter Report to David Frydenlund, Esq, regarding installation and testing of
TW4-23, TW4-24, and TW4-25). These results are summarized in Table 6. Data from fourth
quarter 2012 were used to estimate the pre-pumping hydraulic gradient and saturated thickness.
These data are also summarized in Tables 7 and 8.
The average hydraulic conductivity was estimated to lie within a range of 0.15 ftlday to 0.32
ft/day. Averages were calculated four ways. As shown in Table 6 arithmetic and geometric
averages for wells MW-30, MW-31, TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, TWN-2, and TWN-3 were
calculated as 0.22 and 0.15 ft/day, respectively. Arithmetic and geometric averages for a subset
of these wells (MW-30, MW-31, TW4-22, and TW4-24) were calculated as 0.32 and 0.31 ftlday,
respectively. The lowest value, 0.15 ft/day, represented the geometric average of the hydraulic
conductivity estimates for all the plume wells. The highest value, 0.32 ft/day, represented the
arithmetic average for the four plume wells having the highest hydraulic conductivity estimates
(MW-30, MW-31, TW4-22, and TW4-24).
Pre-pumping hydraulic gradients were estimated at two locations; between TW4-25 and MW-31
(estimated as 0.023 ft/ft), and between TWN-2 and MW-30 (estimated as 0.027 ft/ft). These
results were averaged to yield the value used in the calculation (0.025 ft/ft). The pre-pumping
saturated thickness of 56 feet was an average of pre-pumping saturated thicknesses at TW4-22
and TW4-24.
The hydraulic gradient and saturated thickness used in the calculations are assumed to represent
a steady state 'background' condition. However, assumption of a steady state 'background' is
inconsistent with the cessation of water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds, located
upgradient of the nitrate plume. Hydraulic gradients and saturated thicknesses within the plume
are declining as a result of two factors: reduced recharge from the ponds, and the effects of
nitrate pumping. Separating the impacts of nitrate pumping from the impacts of reduced recharge
from the ponds is problematic. Should pumping cease and 'background' conditions be allowed to
re-establish, however, smaller hydraulic gradients and saturated thicknesses would be expected
due to reduced recharge, which would lower estimates of 'background' flow.
As a result, the 'background' flow calculated using the hydraulic gradient of 0.025 ft/ft and
saturated thickness of 56 feet is considered conservatively large. Furthermore, using the
17
arithmetic average hydraulic conductivity of a subset of plume wells having the highest
conductivities is considered less representative of actual conditions than using the geometric
average conductivity of all of the plume wells. Therefore nitrate pumping likely exceeds flow
through the plume by a factor greater than 1.4, the high end of the calculated range.
The CAP states that MW-5, MW-11, MW-30, and MW-31 are located downgradient ofTW4-22
and TW4-24. MW-30 and MW-31 are within the plume near its downgradient edge and MW-5
and MW-11 are outside and downgradient of the plume. Per the CAP, hydraulic control based on
concentration data will be considered successful if the concentrations of nitrate in MW -30 and
MW -31 remain stable or decline, and concentrations of nitrate in downgradient wells MW -5 and
MW -11 do not exceed the 10 mg/L standard.
Table 5 presents the nitrate concentration data for MW-30, MW-31, MW-5 and MW-11, which
are down-gradient of pumping wells TW4-22 and TW4-24. Based on these concentration data,
the nitrate plume is under control.
The plume has not migrated downgradient to MW -5 or MW -11 because nitrate was not detected
at MW-11 and was detected at a concentration of only 0.2 mg/L at MW-5 last quarter. Between
the previous and current quarters, nitrate concentrations decreased in both MW -30 and MW -31.
Nitrate in MW-30 decreased from 16.2 mg/L to 14.9 mg/L and nitrate in MW-31 decreased from
20.9 mg/L to 18.7 mg/L. Although short-term fluctuations have occurred, nitrate concentrations
in MW-30 and MW-31 have been relatively stable, demonstrating that plume migration is
minimal or absent.
Chloride has been relatively stable at MW-30 but is generally increasing at MW-31 (see Tab J
and Tab K, discussed in Section 4.2.4). The apparent increase in chloride and stable nitrate at
MW -31 suggests a natural attenuation process that is affecting nitrate but not chloride. A likely
process that would degrade nitrate but leave chloride unaffected is reduction of nitrate by pyrite.
The likelihood of this process in the perched zone is discussed in HGC, December 7 2012;
Investigation of Pyrite in the Perched Zone, White Mesa Uranium Mill Site, Blanding, Utah.
4.2.2 Current Nitrate and Chloride Isoconcentration Maps
Included under Tab I of this Report are current nitrate and chloride iso-concentration maps for
the Mill site. Nitrate iso-contours start at 5 mg/L and chloride iso-contours start at 100 mg/L
because those values appear to separate the plumes from background. All nitrate and chloride
data used to develop these iso-concentration maps are from the current quarter's sampling
events.
4.2.3 Comparison of Areal Extent
The increase in nitrate concentrations in TW4-25 from approximately 1 mg.L to 14 mg/L has
expanded the plume to the northeast and brought TW4-25 back within the plume. TW4-25 was
outside the plume from the first quarter of 2013 through last quarter (see Tab J and Tab K,
discussed in Section 4.2.4). The increase in concentration at TW4-24 is likely the result of
reduced wildlife pond dilution.
18
The nitrate concentration at TW4-18 (located east of the nitrate plume) increased slightly from
11.1 mg/L to 11.7 mg/L. Changes in nitrate concentrati n near TW4-I are expe , ted to resull
from changes in pumping and from the ce sati "'of water delivery to the n rlhern wj.ldlife p ncl .
The reduction in low-nitrate recharge from the p . nds appeared to be ha ing th ·anticipated effect
of generally increru eel nitrate concemrati n in wells downgrad ienL of the pond . However
decreasing to li lati ve ly ·tabJe nitrate concentrations at most wells in the vicinity ofTW4-18 over
the previous f, ur quarter after pre i u · increases suggests that conditions in this area have
stabilized.
All bot gh increase · in concemratjon in the area downgradient of the wildlife ponds have been
ant icipated a the re . .ult of reduced di luti n, the magnitude and timing of the increases are
dif ficult to p1·edict due to the measured variation in hydraulic conductivity at the site and other
factors. Nitrate in th e area di rectly d \Vn,gradient (south to south-southwest) of the northern
wildlife ponds is associated with the chloroform plume, is cross-gradient of the nitrate plume as
defined in the CAP, and is within the capture zone of the chloroform pumping system (primarily
chloroform pumping well MW-26). Perched water flow in the area is to the southwest in the
same approximate direction as the main body of the nitrate plume.
Nitrate concentrations at the downgradient edge f lhe plume (MW-30 and MW-31) continue to
be relatively stable, demonstrating that plume migration i minimaJ or b ent. With regard t
chloroform, since the initiation of nitrate pumpin0 the boundary f the chlor form plum bas
migrated to the west toward nitrate pumping well TW4-24 and more recently ha migrated ro the
southwest to reincorporate chloroform monitoring wells TW4-6 and TW4-16. More details
regarding the chloroform data and interpretation are included in the Quarterly Chloroform
Monitoring Report submitted under separate cover.
4.2.4 Nitrate and Chloride Concentration Trend Data and Graphs
Attached under Tab J is a table summarizing values for nitrate and chloride for each well over
time.
Attached under Tab K are graphs showing nitrate and chloride concentration plots in each
monitor well over time.
4.2.5 Interpretation of Analytical Data
Comparing the nitrate analytical results to those of the previous quarter, as summarized in the
tables included under Tab J, the following observations can be made for wells within and
immediately surrounding the nitrate plume:
a) Nitrate concentrations have increased by more than 20% in the following wells
compared to last quarter: MW-26, TW4-19, TW4-20, TW4-22, and TW4-25;
b) Nitrate concentrations have decreased by more than 20% in the following wells
compared to last quarter: MW-27, TW4-16, TWN-2 and TWN-18;
c) Nitrate concentrations have remained within 20% in the following wells compared to
last quarter: MW-30, MW-31, TW4-21, TW4-24, TWN-1, TWN-3, TWN-4 and TWN-
7;and
19
d) MW-11, MW-25, and MW-32 remained non-detect
As indicated, nitrate concentrations for many of the wells with detected nitrate were within 20%
of the values reported during the previous quarter, suggesting that variations are within the range
typical for sampling and analytical error. The remaining wells had changes in concentration
greater than 20%. The latter includes chloroform pumping wells MW-26, TW4-19, and TW4-20;
nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-25 and TWN-2; and non-pumping wells MW-27, TW4-16,
and TWN-18. MW-27 is located adjacent to nitrate pumping well TWN-2; and TW4-16 is
located adjacent to chloroform pumping well MW-26. Fluctuations in concentrations at pumping
wells and wells adjacent to pumping wells likely result in part from the effects of pumping as
discussed in Section 4.1.1. Concentrations at TWN-18 are expected to be influenced by its
location immediately up gradient of the nitrate plume.
As discussed in Section 4.2.3, the nitrate concentration at TW4-25 increased from approximately
1 mg/L last quarter to approximately 14 mg/L this quarter, bringing it again within the nitrate
plume boundary. The nitrate concentrations in chloroform pumping wells MW-26, TW4-19, and
TW4-20 increased from approximately 1.1 mg/L, 4.7 mg/L and 7.7 mg/L, respectively, to
approximately 2.7 mg/L, 8.6 mg/L, and 9.8 mg/L, respectively. MW-27, located west of TWN-
2, and TWN-18, located north of TWN-3, bound the nitrate plume to the west and north (See
Figure 1-1 under Tab 1). In addition, the southernmost (downgradient) boundary of the plume
remains between MW-30/MW-31 and MW-5/MW-11. Nitrate concentrations at MW-5 (adjacent
to MW-11) and MW-11 have historically been low (< 1 mg/L) or non-detect for nitrate (See
Table 5). MW-25, MW-26, MW-32, TW4-16, TW4-19, TW4-20, TWN-1, and TWN-4 bound
the nitrate plume to the east.
As discussed above, the areal extent of the plume has expanded to the northeast to re-encompass
TW4-25. Nitrate concentrations outside the nitrate plume exceed 10 mg/L at a few locations:
TW4-10 (15 mg/L), TW4-12 (19.2 mg/L), TW4-18 (11.7 mg/L), TW4-26 (14.4 mg/L), TW4-27
(26.5 mg/L), and TW4-28 (19 mg!L). All these wells are located southeast of the nitrate plume as
defined in the CAP and all are separated from the plume by wells having nitrate concentrations
that are either non-detect, or, if detected, are less than 10 mg/L. Concentrations at TW4-10,
TW4-12, TW4-18, TW4-26, TW4-27 and TW4-28 are within 20% of their concentrations during
the previous quarter.. From the third quarter of 2013 through the second quarter of 2014, nitrate
concentrations at TW 4-10 and TW 4-18 exceeded 10 mg/L, dropped below 10 mg/L in the third
quarter of 2014, then increased above 10 mg/L last quarter. Elevated nitrate concentrations at
these wells are associated with the chloroform plume, and both are within the capture zone of the
chloroform pumping system. Elevated nitrate at TW4-12, TW4-26, TW4-27, and TW4-28 is
likely related to former cattle ranching operations at the site.
Chloride concentrations are measured because elevated chloride (greater than 100 mg/L) is
associated with the nitrate plume. Chloride concentrations at all sampled locations this qumter
are within 20% of their respective concentrations during the previous quarter except at MW-26,
TW4-16, TW4-19, and TW4-25. These changes likely result from changes in pumping.
20
4.3 Estimation of Pumped Nitrate Mass and Residual Nitrate Mass within the Plume
Nitrate mass removed by pumping is summarized in Table 2, and includes mass removed by both
chloroform and nitrate pumping wells. Table 3 shows the volume of water pumped at each well
and Table 4 provides the details of the nitrate removal for each well. Mass removal calculations
begin with the third quarter of 2010 because the second quarter, 2010 data were specified to be
used to establish a baseline mass for the nitrate plume. As stated in the CAP, the baseline mass is
to be calculated using the second quarter, 2010 concentration and saturated thickness data
"within the area of the kriged 10 mg/L plume boundary." The second quarter, 2010 data set was
considered appropriate because "the second quarter, 2010 concentration peak at TWN-2 likely
identifies a high concentration zone that still exists but has migrated away from the immediate
vicinity of TWN-2."
As shown in Table 2, a total of approximately 1,256 lb of nitrate has been removed from the
perched zone since the third quarter of 2010. Prior to the first quarter of 2013, all direct nitrate
mass removal resulted from operation of chloroform pumping wells MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4,
TW4-19, and TW4-20. During the current quarter:
• A total of approximately 82.6 lb of nitrate was removed by the chloroform pumping wells
and by nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2.
• Of the 82.6 lb removed during the current quarter, approximately 67 lb, (or 81 % ), was
removed by the nitrate pumping wells.
Baseline mass and current quarter mass estimates (nitrate + nitrite as N) for the nitrate plume are
approximately 43,700 lb and 38,742 lbs, respectively. Mass estimates were calculated within the
plume boundaries as defined by the kriged 10 mg/L isocon by 1) gridding (kriging) the nitrate
concentration data on 50-foot centers; 2) calculating the volume of water in each grid cell based
on the saturated thickness and assuming a porosity of 0.18; 3) calculating the mass of
nitrate+nitrite as N in each cell based on the concentration and volume of water for each cell; and
4) totaling the mass of all grid cells within the 10 mg/L plume boundary. Data used in these
calculations included data from wells listed in Table 3 of the CAP.
The nitrate mass estimate for the current quarter is lower than the baseline estimate by 4,958 lb,
and this difference is greater than the amount of nitrate mass removed directly by pumping.
Changes in the quarterly mass estimates are expected to result primarily from 1) nitrate mass
removed directly by pumping, 2) natural attenuation of nitrate, and 3) changes in nitrate
concentrations in wells within the plume as a result of re-distribution of nitrate within the plume
and changes in saturated thicknesses. Redistribution of nitrate within the plume and changes in
saturated thicknesses will be impacted by changes in pumping and in background conditions
such as the decay of the perched water mound associated with the northern wildlife ponds.
Cessation of water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds is expected to result in reduced
saturated thicknesses and reduced dilution, which in turn is expected to result in increases in
concentrations.
The mass estimate during the current quarter (38,742 lb) was larger than the mass estimate
during the previous quarter (34,370 lb) by 4,372 lb or 12.7 %. This difference results primarily
21
from the increase in concentration at TW4-25, which increased the areal extent of the plume
compared to last quarter.
Nitrate mass removal by pumping and natural attenuation (expected to result primarily from
pyrite oxidation/nitrate reduction) act to lower nitrate mass within the plume. Changes resulting
from redistribution of nitrate within the plume are expected to result in both increases and
decreases in concentrations at wells within the plume and therefore increases and decreases in
mass estimates based on those concentrations, thus generating 'noise' in the mass estimates.
Furthermore, because the sum of sampling and analytical error is typically about 20%, changes
in the mass estimates from quarter to quarter of up to 20% could result from typical sampling
and analytical enor alone. Only longer-term analyses of the mass estimates that minimize the
impacts of these quarter to quarter variations will provide useful information on plume mass
trends. Over the long term, nitrate mass estimates are expected to trend downward as a result of
direct removal by pumping and through natural attenuation.
As specified in the CAP, once eight quarters of data are collected (starting with the first quarter
of 2013), a regression trend line is to be applied to the quarterly mass estimates and evaluated.
The trend line is then to be updated quarterly and reevaluated as additional quarters of data are
collected. The evaluation will determine whether the mass estimates are increasing, decreasing,
or stable.
As the previous quarter constituted the eighth quarter as specified in the CAP, the mass estimates
were plotted, and a regression line was fitted to the data and evaluated .. The regression line was
updated this quarter as shown in Figure M.1 of Tab M. The fitted line shows a decreasing trend
in the mass estimates.
5.0 LONG TERM PUMP TEST AT TWN-02, TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-
25 OPERATIONS REPORT
5.1 Introduction
Beginning in January 2013, EFRI began long term pumping of TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and
TWN-02 as required by the Nitrate CAP, dated May 7, 2012 and the SCO dated December 12,
2012.
In addition, as a part of the investigation of chloroform contamination at the Mill site, EFRI has
been conducting a Long Term Pump Test on MW-4, TW4-19, MW-26, and TW4-20, and, since
January 31, 2010, TW4-4. As mentioned in Section 2.1.3 above, on January 14, 2015, wells
TW4-01, TW4-02, and TW4-11 began pumping pursuant to the requirements in the GCAP
which is awaiting final approval. The purpose of the test is to serve as an interim action that will
remove a significant amount of chloroform-contaminated water while gathering additional data
on hydraulic properties in the area of investigation.
Because wells MW-4, TW4-19, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-20, TW4-01, TW4-02, and TW4-11 are
pumping wells that may impact the removal of nitrate, they are included in this report and any
nitrate removal realized as prut of this pumping is calculated and included in the quarterly
reports.
22
The following information documents the operational activities during the quarter.
5.2 Pumping Well Data Collection
Data collected during the quarter included the following:
• Measurement of water levels at MW-4, TW4-19, MW-26, and TW4-20 and,
commencing regularly on March 1, 2010, TW4-4, on a weekly basis,
• Measurement of water levels weekly at TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-02
commencing January 28, 2013,
• Measurement of water levels weekly at TW4-01, TW4-02, and TW4-11
commencing on January 14, 2015, and on a monthly basis selected temporary
wells and permanent monitoring wells.
• Measurement of pumping history, including:
pumping rates
total pumped volume
operational and non-operational periods.
• Periodic sampling of pumped water for chloroform and nitrate/nitrite analysis and
other constituents
5.3 Water Level Measurements
Beginning August 16, 2003, water level measurements from chloroform pumping wells MW-4,
MW-26, and TW4-19 were conducted weekly. From commencement of pumping TW4-20, and
regularly after March 1, 2010 for TW4-4, water levels in these two chloroform pumping wells
have been measured weekly. From commencement of pumping in January 2013, water levels in
wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-02 have been measured weekly. Copies of the
weekly Depth to Water monitoring sheets for MW-4, MW-26, TW4-19, TW4-20, TW4-4, TW4-
22, TW4-24, TW4-25, TWN-02, TW4-01, TW4-02, and TW4-11 are included under Tab C.
Monthly depth to water monitoring is required for all of the chloroform contaminant
investigation wells and non-pumping wells MW-27, MW-30, MW-31, TW4-21, TWN-1, TWN-
3, TWN-4, TWN-7, and TWN-18. Copies of the monthly depth to Water monitoring sheets are
included under Tab C.
5.4 Pumping Rates and Volumes
The pumping wells do not pump continuously, but are on a delay device. The wells purge for a
set amount of time and then shut off to allow the well to recharge. Water from the pumping
wells is either transferred to the Cell 1 evaporation pond or is used in the Mill process.
The pumped wells are fitted with a flow meter which records the volume of water pumped from
the well in gallons. The flow meter readings shown in Tab C are used to calculate the gallons of
water pumped from the wells each quarter as required by Section 7 .2.2 of the CAP. The average
pumping rates and quarterly volumes for each of the pumping wells are shown in Table 3. The
cumulative volume of water pumped from each of the wells is shown in Table 4.
23
Specific operational problems observed with the well or pumping equipment which occurred
during the quarter are noted for each well below in Sections 5.4.1 through 5.4.4.
The following issue was noted as affecting multiple wells in the pumping network and is not
repeated under the Section for each well.
On December 29, 2014, an unscheduled down time occurred which lasted more than 24 hours.
The down time was the caused by frozen transfer lines resulting from system/discharge line
upgrades. The upgrades were necessary to add three more continuous pumping wells to the
chloroform pumping network. The up-sizing of the discharge line required that the old l-inch
lines be excavated while the 4-inch lines were connected. During the excavation the l-inch
lines, which were still connected to the existing pumping system, were exposed to the elements
in the open trench. The Mill experienced below freezing temperatures for most of the week prior
to December 29, 2014. The down time during construction caused six continuous pumping wells
(MW-04, MW-26, TW4-04, TW4-20, TW4-22, and TW4-24) to be off (not pumping) until the
completion of construction. Initial notice of this outage was given by telephone to DRC at
approximately 1:00 pm on Monday December 29, 2014 (within 24 hours of discovery). As
required by the O&M Plan, a 5-day written notification was also provided to DRC on January 5,
2015. The pumps were returned to service on January 9, 2015.
Unless specifically noted below, no additional operational problems were observed with the well
or pumping equipment during the quarter.
5.4.1 TW4-19
On January 12, 2015, Mill Field Personnel noted that the pump stopped working in TW4-19. The
outage was a result of the discharge line upgrade/upsizing necessary to add TW4-0l, TW4-02,
and TW 4-11 to the chloroform pumping network. The discharge line for TW 4-19 was
inadvertently damaged during the upsizing activities. Details regarding the upsizing activities
are provided in the notification provided to DRC on January 5, 2015. The damage to the
discharge line for TW4-19 caused back pressure, which caused the pump in TW4-19 to stop.
The outage due to the damage lasted approximately 48 hours. Rather than repair the line, TW4-
19 was connected to the upsized discharge line used for six other wells in the vicinity.
As required by the O&M Plan, DRC was notified via telephone on Tuesday, January 13, 2015
within 24 hours of discovery. EFRI provided further documentation of the outage via e-mail on
January 15, 2015 when the system had returned to full functionality.
5.4.2 TW 4-02
On February 16, 2015, Mill Field Personnel noted experienced a power outage at TW4-02 during
the routine weekly inspection. The Mill Electricians were notified and the power was restored to
the well the same day. No official notifications to DRC were required as the issue was rectified
within 24-hours.
24
6.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT
There are no corrective actions required during the current monitoring period.
6.1 Assessment of Previous Quarter's Corrective Actions
There were no corrective actions required during the previous quarters' monitoring period.
7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
As per the CAP, the current quarter is the sixth quarter that hydraulic capture associated with
nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 was evaluated. Although
chloroform wells TW4-1, TW4-2, and TW4-11 began pumping this quarter and increased
capture in the vicinity of MW -4, water level monitoring indicates that the apparent combined
capture area of the nitrate and chloroform pumping systems is similar to last quarter. Capture
associated with nitrate pumping wells continues to develop and is expected to increase over time
as water levels decline due to pumping and to cessation of water delivery to the northern wildlife
ponds. Furthermore, the evaluation of the long term interaction between nitrate and chloroform
pumping systems will require more data to be collected as part of routine monitoring. Slow
development of hydraulic capture by the nitrate pumping system is consistent with and expected
based on the relatively low permeability of the perched zone at the site. Definition of capture
associated with the nitrate pumping system will also be influenced by the perched groundwater
mound and the apparently anomalously low water level at TWN-7.
Nitrate pumping is likely sufficient to eventually capture the entire nitrate plume upgradient of
TW4-22 and TW4-24. Pumping during the current quarter was smaller than last quarter primarily
due to the outage described in Section 5, but was within the range estimated for pre-pumping
('background') perched water flow through the nitrate plume. Because the pre-pumping flow
calculations likely overestimate the new 'background' conditions caused by reduced recharge
from the northern wildlife ponds, and because the average plume hydraulic conductivity estimate
from the low end of the calculated range is likely to be more representative of actual conditions,
current quarter nitrate pumping may exceed flow through the plume by a factor greater than 1.4.
First quarter, 2015 nitrate concentrations at many of the wells within and adjacent to the nitrate
plume were within 20% of the values reported during the previous quarter, suggesting that
variations are within the range typical for sampling and analytical error. Changes in
concentration greater than 20% occurred in MW-26, MW-27, TW4-16, TW4-19, TW4-20, TW4-
22, TW4-25, TWN-2, and TWN-18. The concentrations in wells MW-11, MW-25, and MW-32
remained non-detect.
Of the wells showing changes in concentration greater than 20%, MW-26, TW4-19, and TW4-20
are chloroform pumping wells; and TW4-22, TW4-25 and TWN-2 are nitrate pumping wells.
MW-27 is located adjacent to chloroform pumping well TWN-2; and TW4-16 is located adjacent
to chloroform pumping well MW-26. Nitrate concentration fluctuations at pumping wells and
adjacent wells likely result in part from the effects of pumping. Concentrations at TWN-18 are
expected to be influenced by its location immediately up gradient of the nitrate plume ..
25
The nitrate concentration at TW4-25 increased from approximately 1 mg/L last quarter to
approximately 14 mg/L this quarter, bringing it again within the nitrate plume boundary, and
expanding the plume to the northeast. The nitrate concentrations in chloroform pumping wells
MW-26, TW4-19, and TW4-20 increased from approximately 1.1 mg/L, 4.7 mg/L and 7.7 mg/L,
respectively, to approximately 2.7 mg/L, 8.6 mg/L, and 9.8 mg/L, respectively. MW-27, located
west ofTWN-2, and TWN-18, located north ofTWN-3, bound the nitrate plume to the west and
north (See Figure 1-1 under Tab 1). In addition, the southernmost (downgradient) boundary of the
plume remains between MW-30/MW-31 and MW-5/MW-11. Nitrate concentrations at MW-5
(adjacent to MW-11) and MW-11 have historically been low(< 1 mg/L) or non-detect for nitrate
(See Table 5). MW-25, MW-26, MW-32, TW4-16, TW4-19, TW4-20, TWN-1, and TWN-4
bound the nitrate plume to the east.
Although short-term fluctuations have occurred, nitrate concentrations in MW-30 and MW-31
have been relatively stable, demonstrating that plume migration is minimal or absent. Nitrate in
MW-30 decreased from 16.2 mg/L to 14.9 mg/L and nitrate in MW-31 decreased from 20.9
mg/L to 18.7 mg/L. Based on the concentration data at MW-5, MW-11, MW-30, and MW-31,
the nitrate plume is under control.
Chloride has been relatively stable at MW -30 but is generally increasing at MW -31. The
apparent increase in chloride and relatively stable nitrate at MW-31 suggests a natural
attenuation process that is affecting nitrate but not chloride. A likely process that would degrade
nitrate but leave chloride unaffected is reduction of nitrate by pyrite. The likelihood of this
process in the perched zone is discussed in HGC, December 7 2012; Investigation of Pyrite in
the Perched Zone, White Mesa Uranium Mill Site, Blanding, Utah.
Nitrate mass removal by pumping and natural attenuation (expected to result primarily from
pyrite oxidation/nitrate reduction) act to lower nitrate mass within the plume. Changes resulting
from redistribution of nitrate within the plume are expected to result in both increases and
decreases in concentrations at wells within the plume and therefore increases and decreases in
mass estimates based on those concentrations, thus generating 'noise' in the mass estimates.
Furthermore, because the sum of sampling and analytical error is typically about 20%, changes
in the mass estimates from quarter to quarter of up to 20% could result from typical sampling
and analytical error alone. Longer-term analyses of the mass estimates that minimize the impact
of these quarter to quarter variations are expected to provide useful information on plume mass
trends. Over the long term, nitrate mass estimates are expected to trend downward as a result of
direct removal by pumping and through natural attenuation.
As specified in the CAP, once eight quarters of data are collected (starting with the first quarter
of 2013), a regression trend line is to be applied to the quarterly mass estimates and evaluated.
The trend line is then to be updated quarterly and reevaluated as additional quarters of data are
collected. As the previous quarter constituted the eighth quarter as specified in the CAP, the
mass estimates were plotted, and a regression line was fitted to the data and evaluated. The
regression line was updated this quarter as shown in Figure M.1 of Tab M. The fitted line shows
a decreasing trend in the mass estimates.
During the current quarter, a total of approximately 82.6 lb of nitrate was removed by the
chloroform pumping wells and by nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-
26
2. Of the 82.6 lb removed during the current quarter, approximately 67 lb, (or 81 %), was
removed by the nitrate pumping wells.
The baseline nitrate (nitrate+nitrite as N) plume mass calculated as specified in the CAP (based
on second quarter, 2010 data) was approximately 43,700 lb. The mass estimate during the
current quarter was calculated as 38,742 lb which was larger than the mass estimate during the
previous quarter (34,370 lb) by 4,372 lb or 12.7 %. This difference results primarily from the
increase in concentration at TW4-25 which increased the areal extent of the plume compared to
last quarter.
Nitrate concentrations outside the nitrate plume exceed 10 mg/L at a few locations: TW4-10 (15
mg/L), TW4-12 (19.2 mg/L), TW4-18 (11.7 mg/L), TW4-26 (14.4 mg/L), TW4-27 (26.5 mg/L),
and TW4-28 (19 mg/L). All these wells are located southeast of the nitrate plume as defined in
the CAP and all are separated from the plume by wells having nitrate concentrations that are
either non-detect, or, if detected, are less than 10 mg/L. Concentrations at TW4-10, TW4-12,
TW4-18, TW4-26, TW4-27 and TW4-28 are within 20% of their concentrations during the
previous quarter. From the third quarter of 2013 through the second quarter of 2014, nitrate
concentrations at TW4-10 and TW4-18 exceeded 10 mg/L, dropped below 10 mg/L in the third
quarter of 2014, then increased above 10 mg/L last quarter. Elevated nitrate concentrations at
these wells are associated with the chloroform plume, and both are within the capture zone of the
chloroform pumping system. Elevated nitrate at TW4-12, TW4-26, TW4-27, and TW4-28 is
likely related to former cattle ranching operations at the site.
Increases in both nitrate and chloride concentrations at wells near the northern wildlife ponds
(for example TW 4-18) were anticipated as a result of reduced dilution caused by cessation of
water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds. However, decreasing nitrate concentrations at most
wells in the vicinity of TW 4-18 from the first through third quarters of 2014 after a previously
increasing trend (interrupted in the first quarter of 2014) suggest that conditions in this area have
stabilized.
Nitrate mass removal from the perched zone was increased substantially by the start-up of nitrate
pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 during the first quarter of 2013.
Continued operation of these wells is therefore recommended. Pumping these wells, regardless
of any short term fluctuations in concentrations detected at the wells, helps to reduce
downgradient nitrate migration by removing nitrate mass and reducing average hydraulic
gradients, thereby allowing natural attenuation to be more effective. Continued operation of the
nitrate pumping system is expected to eventually reduce nitrate concentrations within the plume
and to further reduce or halt downgradient nitrate migration.
EFRI and its consultants have raised the issues and potential effects associated with cessation of
water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds in March, 2012 during discussions with DRC in
March 2012 and May 2013. While past recharge from the ponds has helped limit many
constituent concentrations within the chloroform and nitrate plumes by dilution, the associated
groundwater mounding has increased hydraulic gradients and contributed to plume migration.
Since use of the northern wildlife ponds ceased in March 2012, the reduction in recharge and
decay of the associated groundwater mound was expected to increase many constituent
27
concentrations within the plumes while reducing hydraulic gradients and rates of plume
migration.
The net impact of reduced wildlife pond recharge is expected to be beneficial even though it was
also expected to result in temporarily higher concentrations until continued mass reduction via
pumping and natural attenuation ultimately reduce concentrations. Temporary increases in nitrate
concentrations are judged less important than reduced nitrate migration rates. The actual impacts
of reduced recharge on concentrations and migration rates will be defined by continued
monitoring.
8.0 ELECTRONIC DATA FILES AND FORMAT
EFRI has provided to the Director an electronic copy of all laboratory results for groundwater
quality monitoring conducted under the nitrate contaminant investigation during the quarter, in
Comma Separated Values ("CSV") format. A copy of the transmittal e-mail is included under
Tab L.
28
9.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION
This document was prepared by Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. on May 20,2015.
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
By:
Scott Bakken
Director, Permitting & Environmental Affairs
29
Certification:
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared
under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified
personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the
person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,
and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Scott Bakken
Director, Permitting & Environmental Affairs
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
30
Tables
Table 1
Summary of Well Sampling and Constituents for the Period
Well Sampl~ Collect-ion Dnte
Piezometer 01 2/18/2015
Piezometer 02 2/18/2015
Piezometer 03 2/18/2015
TWN-01 2/18/2015
TWN-02 2/18/2015
TWN-03 2/19/2015
TWN-04 2118/2015
TWN-07 2119/2015
TWN-07R 2/18/2015
TWN-18 2/18/2015
TW4-22 3/9/2015
1W4-24 3/9/2015
TW4-25 3/9/2015
TWN-60 2119/2015
TW4-60 3/17/2015
TWN-65 2/18/2015
Note: All wells were sampled for Nitrate and Chloride.
TWN-60 is a Dl Field Blank.
TWN-65 is a duplicate of TWN-01.
TW4-60 is the chloroform program Dl Field Blank.
Continuous.JM pumped well.
Date of;_Lab Report
3/1112015
3/11/2015
3/11/2015
3/1112015
3/1112015
3/11/2015
3/11/2015
311112015
311112015
311112015
3/26/2015
3/26/2015
3/26/2015
3/11/2015
3/3112015
3/1112015
Table 2
Nitrate Mass Removal Per Well Per Quarter
MW-4 MW·26 TW4-19 TW4-20 TW4-4 TW4-22 TW4-24 TW4-25 TWN..02 TW4..Ql TW4..Q2 TW4-11 Quarter Totals
Quarter (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (Jbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.)
Q3 2010 3.2 0.3 5.8 1.7 4.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 15.69
Q4 2010 3.8 0.4 17.3 1.4 5.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 27.97
Q1 2011 2.9 0.2 64.5 1.4 4.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 73.30
Q22011 3.5 0.1 15.9 2.7 4.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 27.01
Q3 2011 3.5 0.5 3.5 3.9 5.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 16.82
Q4 2011 3.8 0.8 6.2 2.5 6.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 19.71
Q1 2012 3.6 0.4 0.7 5.0 6.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 15.86
Q2 2012 3.7 0.6 3.4 2.1 5.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 15.03
Q3 2012 3.8 0.5 3.6 2.0 4.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 14.67
Q4 2012 3.2 0.4 5.4 1.8 4.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 14.92
Q1 2013 2.5 0.4 14.1 1.4 3.6 8.1 43.4 7.5 14.8 NA NA NA 95.73
Q2 2013 2.5 0.4 5.6 1.6 3.4 10.7 37.1 6.4 23.9 NA NA NA 91.71
Q3 2013 3.0 0.4 48.4 1.4 3.8 6.3 72.8 6.9 33.4 NA NA NA 176.53
Q4 2013 3.1 0.3 15.8 1.6 3.9 9.4 75.2 6.4 46.3 NA NA NA 162.07
Q1 2014 2.7 0.4 4.1 1.2 3.6 11.2 60.4 2.3 17.2 NA NA NA 103.14
Q2 2014 2.4 0.3 3.3 0.9 3.0 9.5 63.4 1.3 17.8 NA NA NA 101.87
Q3 2014 2.3 0.1 4.1 0.6 3.1 8.5 56.2 1.6 16.4 NA NA NA 92.99
Q4 2014 2.7 0.2 7.8 1.0 3.8 11.0 53.2 0.9 28.0 NA NA NA 108.57
QJ 2015 3.7 0.54 4.33 1.29 2.37 12.73 26.69 8.59 19.17 1.45 1.07 0.72 82.61
Well Totals (pounds) 59.93 7.42 233.90 35.70 81.28 87.45 488.31 41.98 216.98 1.45 1.07 0.72 1256.18
Table 3 Well Pumping Rates and Volumes
Volume of Water Pumped
Pumping Well Name During the Quarter (gals) Average Pump Rate (gpm)
MW-4 76,454.3 4.60
MW-26 24,004.9 11.63
TW4-4 36,941.3 10.87
TW4-19 60,553.0 10.65
TW4-20 15,744.7 8.78
TW4-22 22,046.9 17.77
TW4-24 92,449.3 17.56
TW4-25 71,452.4 16.01
TWN-2 47,262.2 18.28
TW4-01 24,569.2 17.81
TW4-02 24,156.7 17.56
TW4-ll 9,898.7 17.92
Table 4
Table 4 Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
MW-4 MW-26 " -. -
I I
Total
Total Total Pumped Total I Total ~otal Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total
Quarter Pumped (gal) .. Cone (mg/L) Cone (ug/L) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds) (gal) (mg/L) ~ {ug/L) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds)
Total Gallons
pumped for Total
the quarter Total pumped Total grams/453. ] Calculations from the Concentration Concentration gallons/3.785 Concentration ug/1000000 592 to 1. II
and Data Flow Meter from the in mgfLX1000 to to conver to in ugll X total to convert to convert to
Origination data analytical data convert to ug/L, liters liters grams I pounds = ~
Q3 2.010 79859.1 4.8 4800 302.2.66.7 145088012.9 1450.9 3.2.0 63850.0 0.6 600 2.41672..3 145003350 145 0.32.
Q42.010 90042..2. 5 5000 340809.7 1704048635 1704.0 3.76 60180.0 0.7 700 2.27781.3 159446910 159 0.35
Ql2.011 762.47.6 4.6 4600 288597.2. 132.7546964 132.7.5 2,93 55130.0 0.5 500 208667.1 10433352.5 104 0.23
Q2 2.011 85849.3 4.9 4900 32.4939.6 1592.2.04042 1592.2 3.51 55800.6 0.3 300 211205.3 63361581 63 0.14
03.2011 8532.7,7 4.9 4900 322965.3 1582.530188 1582.5 3.49 65618.0 0.9 900 2.48364.1 223527717 224 0.49
Q4 2011 89735.0 5.1 5100 339647.0 1732199573 1732..2 3.82 50191.3 2 2000 189974.1 379948141 380 0.84
Q12012 90376.4 4.8 4800 342074.7 1641958435 1642.0 3.62 31440.1 1.7 1700 119000.8 202301323 202 0,45
Q2 2012. 90916.5 4.9 4900 344118.8 1686181940 1686.2 3.72 26701.2 2.5 2500 101064.1 252660294 253 0.56
Q3 2012 91607.0 5 5000 346732.5 1733662475 1733.7 3.82. 2.5246.0 2.6 2600 95556.1 248445886 248 0.55
Q4 2012 78840.0 4.8 4800 298409.4 1432365120 1432.4 3.16 30797.0 1.46 1460 116566.6 170187302 170 0.38
Q12013 62.943.7 4.78 4780 238241.9 1138796304 1138.8 2.51 22650.7 2.27 2270 85732.9 194613682 195 0.43
Q2 2013 71187.3 4.22 42.2.0 269443.9 1137053387 1137.1 2.51 25343.4 2.11 2110 95924.8 202401263 202 0.45
Q3 2013 72898.8 4.89 4890 275922.0 1349258375 1349.3 2..97 25763.0 1.98 1980 97513.0 193075651 193 0.43
Q42013 70340.4 5.25 5250 266238.4 1397751674 1397.8 3.08 24207.6 1.38 1380 91625.8 126443557 126 0.2.8
Q12014 69833.8 4.7 4700 2.64320.9 1242.308385 1242.3 2.74 23263.1 2.12 2120 88050.8 186667767 187 0.41
Q2 2014 71934.9 4.08 4080 272273.6 1110876274 1110,9 2.45 23757.5 1.42 1420 89922.1 127689435 128 0.28
Q3 2014 74788.2 3.7 3700 283073.3 1047371347 1047.4 2.31 24062.4 0.7 700 91076.2 63753329 64 0.14
Q4 2014 63093.0 5.07 5070 238807.0 1210751515 1210.8 2.67 21875.8 0.934 934 82799.9 77335109 77 0.17
Ql2015 76454.3 5.75 5750 289379.5 1663932272. 1663.9 3.67 24004.9 2..68 2680 90858.5 243500905 2.44 0.54
Totals Since Q3
2010 14922.75.15 59.93 679882,6 7.42
Highlighted cells are the total for the current quarter
Table 4
Table 4 Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
TW4-19 ~ TW4-20
"
Total Pumped Cone Cone Total Pumped Total Total !Total Pumped Cone Cone Total Pumped Total Total
Quarter (gal) (mg/L) (ug/L) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds) (gal) (mg/L) I (ug/L) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds)
~ I
I
I ~ I. I I
Calculations : ~ I and Data I'
Origination ' I
03 2010 116899.2 5.9 5900 442463.5 2.611E+09 2611 5.76 39098.3 5.3 5300 147987.1 784331447 784 1.73
04 2010 767970.5 2.7 2700 2906768,3 7.848E+09 7848 17.30 36752.5 4.6 4600 139108.2 639897778 640 1.41
012011 454607.9 17 17000 1720690.9 2.925E+10 29252 64,49 37187.5 4.4 4400 140754.7 619320625 619 1.37
02 2011 159238.9 12 12000 602719_2 7.233E+09 7233 15.95 67907.7 4.8 4800 257030.6 1.234E+09 1234 2.72
03 2011 141542.6 3 3000 535738.7 1.607E+09 1607 3.54 72311.2 6.5 6500 273697.9 1.779E+09 1779 3.92
04 2011 147647.2 5 5000 558844.7 2.794E+09 2794 6.16 72089.3 4.2 4200 272858.0 1.146E+09 1146 2.53
012012 148747.0 0.6 600 563007.4 337804437 338 0.74 76306.0 7.9 7900 288818.2 2.282E+09 2282 5.03
02 2012 172082.0 2.4 2400 651330.5 1.563E+09 1563 3.45 22956.4 11 11000 86890.1 955790963 956 2.11
03 2012 171345.0 2.5 2500 648540.8 1.621E+09 1621 3.57 22025.0 10.8 10800 83364.6 900337950 900 1.98
04 2012 156653.0 4.1 4100 592931.6 2.431E+09 2431 5.36 20114.0 11 11000 76131.5 837446390 837 1.85
012013 210908.0 7.99 7990 798286.8 6.378E+09 6378 14.06 18177.0 9.07 9070 68799.9 624015501 624 1.38
02 2013 226224.0 2.95 2950 856257.8 2.526E+09 2526 5.57 20252.4 9.76 9760 76655.3 748156060 748 1.65
03 2013 329460.1 17.6 17600 1247006.5 2.195E+10 21947 48.39 19731.0 8.65 8650 74681.8 645997873 646 1.42
042013 403974.0 4.7 4700 1529041.6 7.186E+09 7186 15.84 19280.2 9.64 9640 72975.6 703484369 703 1.55
012014 304851.0 1.62 1620 1153861.0 1.869E+09 1869 4.12 18781.6 7.56 7560 71088.4 537427971 537 1.18
02 2014 297660.0 1.34 1340 1126643.1 1.51E+09 1510 3.33 18462.4 5.95 5950 69880.2 415787095 416 0.92
03 2014 309742.0 1.6 1600 1172373.5 1.876E+09 1876 4.14 17237.9 4.3 4300 65245.5 280555441 281 0.62
Q4 2014 198331,0 4.72 4720 750682.8 3.543E+09 3543 7.81 16341.8 7.67 7670 61853.7 474417979 474 1.05
012015 60553.0 8.56 8560 229193.1 1.962E+09 1962 4.33 15744.7 9.8 9800 59593.7 584018157 584 I 1.29
Totals Since Q3
2010 4778436.4 233.90 630756.9 35.70
Highlighted cells are the total for the current quarter
Table4
Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
TW4-4 TW4-ZZ
" .
Total Total I Total Total
Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total
Quarter (gal) (m!Jil) (u!Jil) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds) (gal) (mg/L) (ugll) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds)
I II !
I
Calculations I II I and Data I Origination
Q3 2010 76916.8 7.30 7300.00 291130.1 2.1E+09 2125.25 4.69 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q4 2010 86872.1 7.10 7100.00 328810.9 2.3E+09 2334.56 5.15 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q12011 73360.0 7.00 7000.00 277667.6 1.9E+09 1943.67 4.29 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q2 2011 80334.6 7.00 7000.00 304066.5 2.1E+09 2128.47 4.69 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q3 2011 97535.0 6.60 6600.00 369170.0 2.4E+09 2436.52 5.37 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q4 2011 109043.5 7.00 7000.00 412729.6 2.9E+09 2889.11 6.37 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q12012 101616.8 7.10 7100.00 384619.6 2.7E+09 2730.80 6.02 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q2 2012 87759.1 7.10 7100.00 332168.2 2.4E+09 2358.39 5.20 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q3 2012 80006.0 7.10 7100.00 302822.7 2.2E+09 2150.04 4.74 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q4 2012 71596.0 7.00 7000.00 270990.9 1.9E+09 1896.94 4.18 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q12013 58716.8 7.36 7360.00 222243,1 1.6E+09 1635.71 3.61 16677.4 58.0 58000.0 63124.0 3661189622.0 3661.2 8.07
Q2 2013 65603.4 6.30 6300.00 248308.9 1.6E+09 1564.35 3.45 25523.2 50.2 50200.0 96605.3 4849586662.4 4849.6 10.69
Q3 2013 63515.4 7.22 7220.00 240405.8 1.7E+09 1735.73 3.83 25592.9 29.7 29700.0 96869.1 2877013057.1 2877.0 6.34
Q4 2013 60233.6 7.84 7840.00 227984.2 1.8E+09 1787.40 3.94 24952.2 45,2 45200.0 94444.1 4268872280.4 4268.9 9.41
Q12014 58992.9 7.28 7280.00 223288.1 1.6E+09 1625.54 3.58 24532.0 54.6 54600.0 92853.6 5069807652.0 5069.8 11.18
Q2 2014 60235.3 5.91 5910.00 227990.6 1.3E+09 1347.42 2.97 24193.9 47.2 47200.0 91573.9 4322288622.8 4322.3 9.53
Q3 2014 69229.4 5.30 5300.00 262033.3 1.4E+09 1388.78 3.06 24610.9 41.5 41500.0 93152.3 3865818644.8 3865.8 8.52
Q4 2014 64422.6 7.02 7020.00 243839.5 1.7E+09 1711.75 3.77 23956.9 54.9 54900.0 90676.9 4978159970.9 4978.2 10.97
Q12015 36941.3 7.70 7700.00 139822.8 1.1E+09 1076.64 2.37 22046.9 69.2 69200.0 83447.5 '-5774568141.8 5774.6 12.73
Totals Since Q3
2010 1402930.6 81.28 212086.3 87.45
Highlighted cells are the total for the current quarter
Table4
Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
lW4-24 lW4-25
7·
I
I
Total Total Total Total
Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total
Quarter (gal) (mgll) 11 (ugll) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds) (gal) (mgfl) (ugll) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds)
I
I I
Calculations
and Data I
Origination l I
Q3 2010 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q4 2010 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q12011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q2 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q3 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q4 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q12012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q2 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q3 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q4 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q12013 144842.6 35.9 35900.0 548229.2 19681429751.9 19681.4 43,39 99369.9 9.0 9000.0 376115.1 3385035643.5 3385.0 7.46
Q2 2013 187509.3 23.7 23700.0 709722.7 16820428001.9 16820.4 37.08 147310.4 52 5240.0 557569.9 2921666087.4 2921.7 6.44
Q3 2013 267703.5 32.6 32600.0 1013257.7 33032202568.5 33032.2 72.82 145840.9 5.69 5690.0 552007.8 3140924419.0 3140.9 6.92 I
Q4 2013 260555.3 34.6 34600.0 986201.8 34122582643.3 34122.6 75,23 126576.5 6.10 6100.0 479092.1 2922461520.3 2922.5 6.44
Q12014 229063.9 31.6 31600.0 867006.9 27397416823.4 27397.4 60.40 129979.2 2.16 2160.0 491971.3 1062657947.5 1062.7 2.34
Q2 2014 216984.1 35.0 35000.0 821284.8 28744968647.5 28745.0 63.37 124829.8 1.21 1210.0 472480.8 571701759.5 571.7 1.26
Q3 2014 213652.5 31.5 31500.0 808674.7 254 73253443.8 25473.3 56.16 119663.9 1.60 1600.0 452927.9 724684578.4 724.7 1.60
Q4 2014 178468.7 35.7 35700.0 675504.0 24115493853.2 24115.5 53.17 107416.1 1.03 1030.0 406569.9 418767036.7 418.8 0.92
Q12015 92449.3 34.6 34600.0 349920.6 12107252777.3 12107.3 26.69 71452.4 14.40 14400.0 270447.3 3894441609.6 3894.4 8.59
Totals Since Q3
2010 1791229.2 488.31 1072439.1 41.98
Highlighted cells are the total for the current quarter
Table 4
Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
lWN-oz 1W4-01 --I -
I
I I
Total Total Total Total
Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total
Quarter (gal) (mgll) (ugfl) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds) (gal) (mgfl) (ugfl) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds)
I'
'
Calculations I and Data I. l
Origination -
03 2010 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
04 2010 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q12011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q2 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
03 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
04 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
012012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q2 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q3 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q4 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA I
Q12013 31009.4 57.3 57300.0 117370.6 6725334176.7 6725.3 14.83 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA I
Q2 2013 49579.3 57.7 57700.0 187657.7 10827846433.9 10827.8 23.87 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA I
Q3 2013 50036.5 80.0 80000.0 189388.2 15151052200.0 15151.1 33.40 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q4 2013 49979.9 111.0 111000.0 189173.9 20998305286.5 20998.3 46.29 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q12014 48320.4 42.6 42600.0 182892.7 7791229616.4 7791.2 17.18 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q2 2014 47611.9 44.7 44700.0 180211.0 8055433555.1 8055.4 17.76 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q3 2014 46927.2 42.0 42000.0 177619.5 7460016984.0 7460.0 16.45 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q4 2014 47585.6 70.6 70600.0 180111.5 12715871617.6 12715.9 28.03 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
012015 47262.2 48.6 48600.0 178887.4 8693928952.2 8693.9 19.17 24569.2 7.1 7060.0 92994.4 656540619.3 656 5 1.45
Totals Since Q3
2010 418312.4 216.98 24569.2 1.45
Highlighted tells are the total for the current quarter Highlighted tells are the total for the current quarter
Table 4
Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
TW4-02 ·-· TW4-ll
] Total ,,
Removed
Total Total Total Total by All
Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total Wells
Quarter (gal) (mg/L) (ugfL) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds) (gal) (mgfL) (ugfL) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds) (pounds)
I l
. I. I
Calculations 1: and Data '
Origination
Q3 2010 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 15_69
Q4 2010 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 27.97 I
Q12011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 73.30
Q2 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 27.01 I
Q3 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 16.82
Q4 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 19.71 I
Q12012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 15.86
Q2 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 15.03
Q3 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 14.67 I
Q4 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 14.92
Q12013 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 95.73 I
Q2 2013 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 91.71 I
Q3 2013 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 176.53
Q4 2013 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 162.07
Q12014 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 103.14
Q2 2014 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 101.87
Q3 2014 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 92.99
Q4 2014 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 108.57
Q12015 24156.7 ~.3 5320.0 91433.1 486424142.5 486.4 1.07 9898.7 8.7 8720.0 37466.6 326708573.2 326.7 0.72 82.61 ----
Totals Since Q3
2010 24156.7 1.07 9898.7 0.72 1256.18
Highlighted cells are the total for the current quarter Highlighted cells are the total for the current quarter
Q2
L00atio.n 20J,O
MW..SO 15.8
_M W'-3J 22.5
~f\\1!:5 ND
MW~l '"" ND
ND =Not detected
NS = Not Sampled
QS. "Q4 QJ
20t0 Z{>l,O 2_011
15 16 16
21 20 21
NS 0.2 NS
ND ND ND
TableS
Nitrate Data Over Time for MW-30. MW-31. MW-5. and MW-11 ' Q2' w Q~ Ql Q2 Q3· Q4 ;Ql ~2 P@ Q4 Ql ~2 Q3· Q4. Ql f!-
2011 2011 20LL W 12 2012 201 2~ 20'12 2{)13 L 20 1 ~ 2!ll.l.3 2Ql-3; 20)4 20Lil 20J-E~i_, 2'014 10l5
17 16 16 17 16 17 18.5 21.4 18.8 17.6 19.5 18.4 19.4 16.8 16.2 14.9
22 21 21 21 20 21 23.6 19.3 23.8 21.7 23.9 20.6 23.1 18.9 20.9 18.7
0.2 NS 0.2 NS 0.1 NS ND NS ND NS 0.279 NS ND NS 0.21 NS
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
TABLE 6
Slug Test Results
(Using KGS Solution and Automatically Logged Data)
Well K
lcm/s)
MW-30 1.0E-04
MW-31 7.1E-05
TW4-22 1.3E-04
TW4-24 1.6E-04
TW4-25 5.8E-05
TWN-2 1.5E-05
TWN-3 8.6E-06
Average 1
Average2
Average 3
Average 4
Notes:
Average 1 = arithemetic average of all wells
Average 2 =geometric average of all wells
K
JftldaY}
0.28
0.20
0.36
0.45
0.16
0.042
0.024
0.22
0.15
0.32
0.31
Average 3 = arithemetic average of MW-30, MW-31, TW4-22, and TW4-24
Average 4 =geometric average of MW-30, MW-31, TW4-22, and TW4-24
cmls = centimeters per second
ft!day = feet per day
K = hydraulic conductivity
KGS = KGS Unconfined Slug Test Solution in Aqtesolve ™.
S:\Environmentai\UnWhiteMesaMiii\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Report\2015 01\FiowCalcs-Tables 6-7-8: Table 6
TABLE 7
Pre-Pumping Saturated Thicknesses
Depth to Depth to Water Saturated Thickness
Well Brushy Basin Fourth Quarter, 2012 Above Brushy Basin
(ft) (ft) (ft)
TW4-22 112 53 58
TW4-24 110 55 55
Notes:
ft =feet
S:\Environmentai\UT\WhiteMesaMiii\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Report\2015 Q1\FiowCalcs-Tables 6-7-8: Table 7
TABLE 8
Pre-Pumping Hydraulic Gradients and Flow Calculations
Pathline Boundaries
Path Length Head Change Hydraulic Gradient
(ft) (ft) (ftlft)
TW4-25 to MW-31 2060 48 0.023
TWN-2 to MW-30 2450 67 0.027
average 0.025
1 min flow (gpm) 1.31
2 max flow (gpm) 2.79
Notes:
ft =feet
ft!ft = feet per foot
gpm = gallons per minute
1 assumes width = 1 ,200 ft; saturated thickness = 56 ft; K = 0.15 ft/day; and gradient = 0.025 ft/ft
2 assumes width = 1 ,200 ft; saturated thickness = 56 ft; K = 0.32 ft/day; and gradient = 0.025 ft/ft
S:\Environmentai\UT\WhitaMesaMiii\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Report\2015 Q1\FiowCalcs-Tables 6-7-8: Table 8
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
Tab B Order of Sampling and Field Data Worksheets
Tab C Kriged Current Quarter Groundwater Contour Map, Capture Zone Map, Capture Zone Details
Map, and Weekly, Monthly and Quarterly Depth to Water Data
Tab D Kriged Previous Quarter Groundwater Contour Map
Tab E Hydrographs of Groundwater Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab F Depths to Groundwater and Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab G Laboratory Analytical Reports
Tab H Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
H-1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation
H-2 Holding Time Evaluation
H-3 Analytical Method Check
H-4 Reporting Limit Evaluation
H-5 QAJQC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
H-6 QC Control Limits for Analyses and Blanks
H-7 Receipt Temperature Evaluation
H-8 Rinsate Evaluation
Tab I Kriged Current Quarter Isoconcentration Maps
Tab J Analyte Concentration Data Over Time
Tab K Concentration Trend Graphs
Tab L CSV Transmittal Letter
Tab M Residual Mass Estimate Analysis Figures and Tables
Tab A
Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
TW4-37 • temporary perched monitoring well
installed March, 2015
TW4-19
EB perched chloroform or
nitrate pumping well
MW-5 • perched monitoring well
TW4·12
0 temporary perched monitoring well
TWN-7
~ temporary perched nitrate monitoring
well
PIEZ-1
~ perched piezometer
TW4-35 temporary perched monitoring well ~ installed May, 2014
RUIN SPRING
~ seep or spring
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
WHITE MESA SITE PLAN SHOWING LOCATIONS OF
PERCHED WELLS AND PIEZOMETERS
REFERENCE I FIGURE
H :/718000/may15/Uwelloc0315_rev .srf A-1
TabB
Order of Sampling and Field Data Worksheets
Nitrate
Mg/L
Previous
c
Nitrate Samples
Name Qrt. Date/Purge sample
TWN-7 0.968
TWN-4 1.44
TWN-1 1.46
TWN-18 1.47
TWN-3 19.1
TWN-2 70.6
Duplicate of
Rinsate
'fw,l)-o\
01 Sample -f'.,..V -r..O
Plez 1 5.75
Piez 2 0.755
Piez 3 1.74
2./.1'1 J I~ 07"3_f.)
1~18'/tS rzse:.
z../Wit:, 132-S
VlstJL"'l iYDi
z.li'IILS o-7'15
17./1~/15 e>g-z..s
'1./ Iff/IS l3'Z.S
2/1~/15 \It)/
l.z.Jiq/LI':; 0/11)
'2./lgJ !5 b851
"Z/IY l5 0&35
2118/!.5 ozY.S
Nitrate Order
1st Quarter 2015
Depth Total Depth
105
125.7
112.5
145
96
96
Name
TWN-7R
TWN-4R
TWN-lR
TWN-lBR
TWN-3R
TWN-2R
Samplers:
(
Rlnsate Samples
Date Sample
17/'1'/~ 1157
MiD-Gcaundwater Discharge Permit
Groundwater Monltoring Quality Assurance Plan IQAP)
Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7. 2 -Errata
AITACBMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FolELDDATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
"'j See instruction
Description of Sampling Event I 1 ~,. Q-.. ... r ·h:r N •+rc:~.fe zD 1.5
Sampler Name
Location (well name): IL.--I.Pi-!.l .::::.e"L.::::.....-.....;0~1 -----------' and initials: 1 -r:nn~r Ho iJ,J,.,,::~J.rH
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging ._I _'2..~1 :..:.18~1..:-z....::;o~LS~----_.
Well Purging Equip Used: [QJ purnp or ~~ bailer
and Sampling (if different)!._ :..::rJ~/..t...;f!l'-----------1
Well Pump (if other than Bem1et) .... 1 -~-'/-~~-------'
Purging Method Used: [QJ2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I O .... o..r ted.<i A) dr ... +e: Prev. Well Sampled in Saillpling Event I f, ~~-0~
pH Buffer 7 n ,_1___,7"'-.o ____ __,
Specific Conductance ,_I ..;.J,;;,.tlo;;..;o:.._ ___ _.l J!MHOS/ em
Depth to Water Before Purging 164 .S&
Weather Cond.
Tinle l o ~ I Gal. Purged I 0
Conductance I '2.i2~ I pH I g,£}3
Temp. ac I 11.20 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I i ~·:) I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
Time I I Gal. Purged I
Conductance I I pH I
Temp. "C I I
Redox Potential Eh. (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
I
I
I
I
pH Buffer 4.0 L..j,O
Well Depth(O.Olft): ._I _o ____ _j
Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:~-0----11(.653h)
3" Well:_ o (.3G7h)
Ext'l Amb. Temp. •c (prior sampling event)l._3...;..~ __ __,
Time I I GaL Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. "C I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
1 of2 Capturx· COMPATIBLE WITH~.ti:r--FIINCTIONAUTY
Mill-Gr.oundwater Dis~harge Permit
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan IO,AP) ( Date. 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Volume of Water Purged 0 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flov.· Rate (Q). in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I () T=2V/Q=I 0 I
Nnmber of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) D
If well eYacuated to dryness, number of gallons e,·acuated 0
Name of Certified Analytical Labomtory if Other Than Energy Labs ,AWi\L
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients Cil D 100m! D ~ H2S04 s D
Heavy Metals 0 0 250m! 0 0 HN03 0 0
AJJ Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250m! D 0 No Preserv_ 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 D
l>thcr (specify) Iii 0 Sample volume 0 Ul 0 ~
C.\,lor,je-If preservative is used, spe<:ify
Type and Quantity of Preservative·
~
Final Depth j (;)-l , f> 2-Sample Time
!
:Comment
i See instruction
·'
Arr 1 1le~ on srte (;\.+-085;2
S.~rv1p1e~ 6G'.,JeJ "'+ og57
-ro..nn~r o.l\~ GMr111 pr~<!ll.J.--f~ Colle<-+ .5..:onp1e~.
wo..+e.r w~ IY\C.·.)+~ Glct\( buJ h"~ Sal")~ wocA 1/~ r.._rfn.:.lr:.-j Aotfll~
Le.H $.i+~ o.t DGJOO
1-----------'IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
:;
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater A 2 of2 capturx· COM.ATIOLE WITH/'-...-..ori:r-FUNCTIONALITY
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I l !>T G\Ao..f" t-er N-1-l-rotfc: zo15
See instruction
Location (well name): L]_P..:...':...;e:..:'Z.::::.---=-0-=7.=------------J
Sampler N arne
and initials: ] -rAnna HoJJ,'J~-:1 1-r/J
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging ]L__"2_./c...;-l'""'~'-'-/-='Z;;.::O~IS..l-------' and Sampling (if different) /lllfJr
Well Purging Equip Used: [g]pump or IT[] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) ...VIA
Purging Method Used: [g]2 casings [gJ3 casings
Sampling Event Qu.o.d:-e.rl~ A)J,.o...te.. Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event l jwA) _, O 2....
pH Buffer 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 LJ.O
Specific Conductance ._I _lo_o_o ____ _.] [.tMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): ._I ..;;...0 ____ __,
Depth to Water Before Purging ] ~ b, 55.5 Casing Volume (V) 4" Wcll:~_o ___ -ll(.653h)
3" Well:_ 0 _(.367h)
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb . Temp. oc (prior sampling event),_] 2_0 __ __,
Time I os3.3 I Gal. Purged I 0 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance 11'10 I pH I eo.r67 I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I r~.-.sq I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 2'f~ I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I Q I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q}, in gprm .
S/60 = I 6
Time to evacuate two ca·sing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I D I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) l o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated I o
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ~..1 ....;.A_VJ'--A.;...L ______ _.
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below)
VOCs D D 3x40 ml
Nutrients ~ D IOOml
Heavy Metals D D 250m!
All Other Non Radiologies D D 250ml
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume
Gh 1or;Je.
Final Depth I 37, L J Sample Time
Comment
A n·;~e~ on ~it~ o.t o~ J"Mt:f" Mlj. 6-o.((ifl pt'~ed­
~~r1f)~ bo._;)ea ~t O~,S Wti\ter w~s MDS~
Le& sli-~ (At o83~
Piez-02 02-18-2015 !Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
y N y
D D HCL D
D ~ H2S04 13
D D HN03 D
D D No Preserv. D
D D HN03 D
D 1!9 ~
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
·h co llecf--.$Ml1pJ~.
c. lear
See instruction
N
D
D
D
D
D
M
2 of 2
~
.. ,
:
Mill-Grotr.ldwater ~charge Permit ( Date: 06-()6-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quafity Assurance Plan (QA.P)
ATTACHMENT 1-2 · :~~,,..u..L. WlDTE MESA URANIUM MILL See instruction
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I \ ~'T Qv,"'r f~l"' IV ·h-.,+e ZD l5
Location (well name): L--1 --~.P~1=e."t.!!L-:....D~)~--------__.
Sampler Name
and initials: I ·~V!nc=r Hl!JJ,Jq1/IH
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging l._-=l.:.L/-LI.!l&.~.-/.z=.2~0..:..1 S..l------'
WellPurgingEquip Used: IQ]pump or ~bailer
and Sampling (if different) IL.,;.v.:=LJVAo.-_______ __.j
Well Pwnp (if other than BenneL) l.._-v..;..:....:-"-'.=--------'
Purging Method Used: [QJ2 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event j QV\o..-}~rlj A.l l.fr.,t, Prev. Well Sampled in SamplingEvent I =ft.tht) 'Rc:z.-DZ
pH Buffer 7.0 ._! ___,_/.:...;:.0'-------' pH Buffer 4 0
Specific Conductance ._I -',_oo-'o;..._ ___ _.lflMElOSf em Well Depth(O.Olft): ._I ....;.o ____ __.
Depth to Water Before Purging I L!'1 -g ') casing Volwnc (V) 4" weu :r_o ___ --ij<-65311)
3" Well:_ o _ (.36711)
Weather Cond. Ext'! Am b. Temp. •c (prior sampling event}._l ..;;.3 _0 __ _.
Time I ol643 I GaL Purged I 6 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I 211.,~ I pH I l1.2.3 I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp_ oc I j·~.-2.~ I Temp. °C I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 1 '1~ I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTIJ) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. °C I. l Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eb (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTIJ) I I Turbidity {NTU) I I
White MeSil Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater-.A 1 of2 capturx-COWPHIILE WITN/"U."'Ii;--FUNCTIONALITY
Mill-Groundw•ter Discharge P!!rmit ( Date. 01>-06-12 Rev. 7 2 -Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged D galfon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q). in gpm,
S/60 = I 0
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) I D
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated D
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs [}.!..~....!.'A..:..:L=-------~
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if oti1er than as Prcservalive Type
y N specified below)
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml
Nutrients Iii 0 lOOml
Hea-vy Metals 0 0 250ml
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250 rnl
Gross Alpha 0 0 l,OOOml
OU1cr (specify) m 0 Sample volume
C..h \oc ' Je
rinal Depth I 4 -~ ~ Sample Time
:.Comment
-( ... 1\ner (}.flJ.. G-o.rcin -pre!>.dl f 1 Pu·r;veJ.. on s.r+e u.+ 0 ~'iC
SP'-t'Y\ p'l e~ bo-; ) e a "'~ ,:--g•-1.1) wa--+er 1.\).:;.._s. rno~t~
Le. ft s I +-e. ((T-0 fS'18'
L....-_________ __.IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
WhiteMes;~Mill
Field Date; Workshe!!t for Groundwater
y
0
0
0
0
0
0
N
0
IE
0
D
0
12!1
y
HC'L 0
H2S04 fa
HN03 0
No Preserv. 0
HN03 0
0
If preservative is used, spccil:)'
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
See instruction >
+..:. CD )/e c+ ..:Yo117p 7~
ckar
N
0
0
0
0
0
119
Mm -Groundw~ter Discharge Permit / \. Date; 06-06-12 Rev 7 _ 2 -Errata
Groundwater ~onitoring Quality Assurant@ Plan (QAP)
I
i l t
. ;
1
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I I ~T O.~N>-der A:Ji+r-d~ z.oi:S
• Sec insbUctioo
Sampler Name
Location (well name): I -rw.N-01 and initials: I ~""~' Hoil·f!j 1!11
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging ~-.I _ ... ::;._...:.../..:..:.l~<..l./_,z=-=o:..;,:'!:.==-----___.
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump or [gJ bailer
and Sampling (if different) I~,.;M;..;:~~;tl~---------~
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I Gr.JMI ·to?
Purging Method Used: 002 casings IQJJ casings
Sampling Event I Q~r·tef b N ~h~tc Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling E\'ent l ·==(v::n:,r:::"07 · -rw;J-Oif
'Tw,V·O~ pH Buffer 7.0 17.0 pH Buffer 4.0 j .o
Specific Conductance ._I _:.I_::;_Do:...:o'-------'IJ-1 ifHOS' em Well Depth(O.Olft): I li'2-~0
Depth to Water Before Purging I (::P. ~& Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:' ;53 10 ,(.653b)
3" Well :~__ o.;;..._ __ _J_(.367h)
Weather Cond. Ext'l Am b. Temp. •c (prior sampling event)._! 'f.._' __ ___.
Time I r~tz I Gal. Purged I 5~ I Time 1 1'32..~ I Gal. Purged I l,f: I
Conductance I ~:1~ I pH I b .1S I Conductance I ~"'I I pH I b..7b I
Temp. °C I \S .O'J I Temp. °C I 1S.0'1 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I~F ·--, Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 l"'h I
Turbidity (NTU) I n I Turbidity {NTU) I O I
Time I 1'3-zq I Gal. Purged I 77 I Time I P ZS I Gal. Purged I g~ I
Conductance I ~~~ I pH I ~.'"16 I Conductance I 8:>~ I pHI 6 .78' I
Temp. oc I \?.Ol:. I Temp. oc II ~ 07 _j
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~~~ I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I l j ;i I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) l o I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2 Capturx· COIOPATIILE WIT!l_...dn.,.k--FUNCTIONALITY
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2 -Err.lta
Groundwater ~onitoring Quality A••urance Plan IQAP)
Volmne of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q). in g,pm.
S/60 = I 11.0
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if oilier than lwo)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2VIQ= I f>,l2 "]
I o
If well e\'acuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated ._I _C: ---....J
Name of Cenified Analytical Laboratory if Other Timn Energy Labs IL...;....A;_W...:..i\:..::L,__ ____ _.
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if oilier than as Preservative Type
VOCs
Nutrients
Heavy Metals
All Other Non Radiologies
Gross Alpha
Other (specify)
C.h\or ;de
~inal Depth I [07, Y (.
]
ii
~omment
Arrl\le,\ on ~~~~ ,.J rslS
p "-r5<!. be~M "-f \":'-,Jt
y
D
lXI
D
D
0
~
Pv..r~e ef1dc~ ttl)~ ~IYJ~~~
N specified below) y N y
D 3x40m1 D D HCL D
D 100 ml D ~ H2S04 B
0 250ml D 0 HN03 0
0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. D
0 1,000 ml D 0 HNO:l D
0 Sample volume 0 &:1 0
IfpreseiVntive is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Sample Time
See instruction
·~n(ler ~"'\
t'v.r~a w~ll
eolledd J
G-"'rr•" ?re.~.urr tbr pw~e ()..(\~ SD.fY1pl·'':5 even+:
tor 0.... ·h,·hl cr ~ M;llvJe:::... t.Ja.f~r ~CL!. ck-<-ir
l'~ZS LeO sr:.k a.+ )'327
N
0
0
D
D
D
12.1
L-...---""'"'-"'""""'-"-""""'---__;,_Jino not touch this cell (SheetN~e)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater A 2 of2 capturx-COMPATIBLE WrTtl;/"-u.&ti>--rullCfiOHALJU
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I ,~ Q\AM+~· rJi'fr~te zolS
See instruction
Location (well name): .._l..:-r....:.w..:N..:..-.....::.07..=-----------J
Sampler Name
and initials: 1...,-;.r'll?e;r H61),J~~/-r).f
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I 7.../lg/-aolS and Sampling (if different) .N'/A
Well Purging Equip Used: I][) pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I Gon+inv.ov. ~
Purging Method Used: [QJ2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I o~('+erl;? /'l ::ho-.+c Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event .... l_tV._'/_1\ ________ ___,
pH Buffer 7.0
Specific Conductance ._I _I_Oo_o ____ __.l~-tMHOS/ em
Depth to Water Before Purging l 33.6b
Weather Cond.
Time I o~rz.'t I Gal. Purged l ~
Conductance l -z_qL)~ I pH I {;.S~
Temp. oc I 14,...,, I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ~H I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
Time I I Gal. Purged I
Conductance I I pH I
Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
I
I
I
I
pH Buffer 4.0
Well Depth(O.Olft): I 'l(;,,Dt>
Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:l 40,"1~ 1(.653h)
3" Well~~--__ o __ -l.(.367h)
Ext'l Amb. Temp. ·c (prior sampling eventl._IZ_0 __ ____.
Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) L I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 0 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I l~.t>
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q =I g:s-z. I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) D
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 0
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ._I .:..A:...;Wc....:.;;A..::L:.-_____ __,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2S04 ~ 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250m] 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250m] 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) IJ'j 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0 ~
c~lor;Je. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth ._I_S_7_._1J ___ _, Sample Time o&z.S
See instruction
Comment
Arr;\lecl Ofl ~··t~ a-.+ 0~7:2.. -(Annd" lkf'l~ (j-lil.(f';n p<c:Set\1--1-b Gollec..+ i..~1'11ple~.
~"-fYlp )c~ Go ll c:oc.+~~ o-,.} C ~'Z..S wo-..+er wc..s G )-Gor
Left" ~ITe o..+ O<f>7.7
TWN-02 02-18-2015 lDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I I sr Gl v..tt..rtGr A) IJr,..te 2.0 L5
Location (well name): 1~...-r..!....:.w:::.;t\J~-*..::0=~~--------____.
Field Sample ID
Sampler N arne
and initials:
See instruction
Date and Time for Purging l~.-.:-z::.:./-'l.::..g;'---z._o.;...LS~-----' and Sampling (if different) ._I .;;;Z"""/-'J..;.;q)'--z._o....;.l.;;:;5 _____ ____,
Well Purging Equip Used: IT[] pump or @]bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I Gru..1lilfcn
Purging Method Used: 002 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event I Gv.o.rterlj 1J;0}1"~tc::. Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event ~...l_-r_w_W_-_1 8' _____ ___,
pH Buffer 7.0
Specific Conductance l.._lo_o_o ____ _,l~-tMHOS/ em
Depth to Water Before Purging I 3 g. q 0
Weather Cond.
Time I J9zq I Gal. Purged I Y7.6D
Conductance l 73oD I pH I G»sg
Temp. oc 1 \s.rs I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I Zl':S I
Turbidity (NTU) I -z..O I
Time I 0 7 '1'1 I Gal. Purged I 0
Conductance I '2-'2.~ Y I pH I G;.E;o
Temp. oc I \':S.Z\9 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
I
I
I
I
pH Buffer 4.0 L\.0
Well Depth(O.Olft): ._I _,_q_6_.o_o __ ____.
Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:,37. Z8 ,(.653h)
3" Well:~... __ o __ __,_(.367h)
Ext'l Amb. Temp. ·c (prior sampling eventl~-,;.17_0_6 __ _,
Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time 1 o'q" I Gal. Purged l o I
Conductance I 'l:'Z<'j~ I pH I b5'1 I
Temp. oc I r3..2H I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q) in gpm.
S/60 = I 1LD
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= J b .77 I
l l.27
I t.\7.bo
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs wl A..._W--'-"[1..._1-_____ --1
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients ~ D 100 ml D !] H2S04 El D
Heavy Metals D D 250 ml D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologies D D 250 ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume D El 0 ~
C.nlona(.. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth ~..-I _1...;_~,;_.1_) __ --J Sample Time 07Y5
See instruction
Comment
Arri..>~a 0(1 s.;+~ o.i-I~ 23 ~nne/' tMlJ.. G-Olr(;f) yc~s..eflf J.or ru.r~e. Pv.r~~ .b'G"'11 o.+ 71(<.5
P tA.r~ed well Fof fA. ~o-1-e>~J 0 .f 'i M1nl),.·h~~ D,,ll(l -zo .seconb. f'w-~~J Well .Jrj!
PV\.r~c e(l~ea o..+ lY21, LGJ-f ~)tc eo..-d-IL\31. 1.0o...+er ~ I'J'>"~.J-,!j cJ<:~r.
An--i\1~6 on s.lfe-o.,} 07YO ~fl~r" MA Gp..rr:n pr~etrf ~ collec-J--s~ples, De.p+h· ..fo ~ ())~
3S. C:.o f.o..Mp1e.> b~-J~ d o7LfS LeJ} s_;+~ ad-o7Y7
TWN-03 02-18-2015 ]Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
See instruction
D~ri~oo~s~~i~E~m: ~~-~~-~_Q_._~_~_~_c_r_~-~-~-~_t_~_z_o_~~----------------~
Sampler N arne
and initials: 1-,-;..Ml« Holi:J.r.a.~/11:} Location (well name): 1.__--rw __ N_-_o_q.;...._ ________ __.
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I '2./18/2015 and Sampling (if different) I N/~
Well Purging Equip Used: rn::]pump or IQJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: 002 casings IQJ3 casings
Sampling Event I Q\Ab..rterb 1\5;-J<~J< Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event ._I ~_l_W_JJ_-_0_7 _____ __.
pH Buffer 7.0 /,0 pH Buffer 4.0 4.0
Specific Conductance ~~ _l_oo_o ____ _.l ~MHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): I )"2.S., 7/J
Depth to Water Before Purging I !;:3,00 4" Well:l 47, g7 1(.653h)
3" Well: o (.367h) '---"'------'
Casing Volume (V)
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling event)._l'?_0
__ _.
Time I )"2.53 I Gal. Purged I gg I Time I l&S"i I Gal. Purged 111 I
Conductance I \Ot.?:> I pH I c..sz I Conductance I I~ I pHI Gsz I
Temp. °C 1 ~05 I Temp. oc 114.72. I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I -z.."ZJ,.. I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 22!:> I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) 16 I
Time I 1<.5$ I Gal. Purged I 1)D I Time I IZSL I Gal. Purged I 1Z1 I
Conductance I ,0'=3 I pH IG .&-z I Conductance IIOb3 I pH I b.52 I
Temp. °C I 1'1.7!:;, I Temp. oc 11q,7z I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I rz."Z.q I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I z:zq I
Turbidity (NTU) I C> I Turbidity (NTU) l l> I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged lzJ gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate CQ), in gpm.
S/60 = I 11. v
Time to evacuate two c.:a in volumes (2V)
T = 2V /Q = I g' b3 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) l o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated lo
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ILA:...;..:.W....:.Pr.;....L.:....._ _____ -..~
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D
Nutrients Kl D 100ml D £] H2S04 ~
Heavy Metals D D 250 ml D D HN03 D
All Other Non Radiologies D D 250 ml D D No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume D ~ D
C~)or·,Jc. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth IL......=5::....L\,...S.t..:~.__ _ ____. Sample Time
See instruction
Comment
Arr'IIJd; on .si-te o..t )7. 'i l --r;.nnt.(" ll\)1a &o.rr: (l p('~.s..enr +0 ..-ru..r~.e. ~nJ .s ompli:j ¢Ven-t.
f v.r~ b~~"n q..t' \-z.qs. 'Pv..r~.d we\\ ~,.-o... ¢-~a..\ of 1\ m:nu.-Tt:s., w4r ~~ c.le(4.r-
f1Ar~e, eY1Jea C\na .Y."1p1~~ colled-cl ~-t rz.5(.,.. L-e..f.t sJe ~-s )7..51
TWN-04 02-18-2015 loo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
D
D
IB
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I I !.I Qv.M+er A) ,'4fr ~ fc:: "2 o l5
• See instruction
Location (well name): ._I _-r_w......;....}.)_-_0;:_7-'---------------'
Sampler Name
and initials: I ~nn-c.r Hon;J/)~frH
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I "2.../ 18/ "ZOJ.S and Sampling (if different) ._I -'~;,;,/...;,11f=J_z_a_;;J.S==--_____ _.
Well Purging Equip Used: (![]pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) Gfw''Jfo~
Purging Method Used: 11[]2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I Qv.o-rftr}Oj .N •'::J:o..f~ Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event I l vJAJ-0 7 R.
pH Buffer 7.0 -,, "D
Specific Conductance!._ _\_O_D'O ____ _.I ~-tMHOS/ em
Depth to Water Before Purging I 8' S. tf 0
Weather Cond.
Time I .Jz-z.\ I Gal. Purged I 16.50
Conductance I )253 I pH 17./l
Temp. oc I \ 4.7'1 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I -z.5z I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
Time l673j I Gal. Purged lo
Conductance I l·z:z.~ I pH I (; .. '2..0
Temp. oc 1 r3,,4g. I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
I
I
I
I
pH Buffer 4.0 Y.D
Well Depth(O.Olft): )05,0l>
Casing Volume (V) 4" w ll:,Jz,4] ,(.653h)
3" W~II:.__O;;,.,..._ __ _..C.367h)
Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling eventliLS=-"----'
Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I073b I Gal. Purged IO I
Conductance I rz..::si I pH I t;.=zs I
Temp. oc 119.61 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged lb. SO gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q) in gpm.
S/60 = I II. D
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casjn
T = 2V/Q = z:z4. '--------J
\.3Z.
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I.__A"""'W___._A.;._t.. _____ ___.
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients ~ D 100 ml D [29 H2S04 ~ D
Heavy Metals D D 250 ml D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiol{)gics D D 250 ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume D IE D ~
G 'hJ M~ Je If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth ,_I ..;_10_3 ..;.... '2..5=-__ _. Sample Time I D73S
See instruction
Comment
Arr;\)~~ on ~;+~ ,.-r 1217. ~Mo-e(' lhtl~ G-M-r;n pre.se"1-..f;(' }> ...... r~e. 'Pv..c~-e b~.311'-fl e-.t IZGO
~v..r6e~ 'ilcll .for ~ tohJ of \ Mt'ntA.tG 30 .S~c.ofl!.S. PIA,r~d. well .jr.j~ VJ"'t~ w~ cJe.a.f'.
fv..r~-e cndd. o.t 1-z"ZJ. L.,.i)-si·J-c ~ 1-z.z~
Arri\.le~ Ot\ sii-e. ~-t 0731 lMner" ~ 6-AS"r'•n 'f'r'GS.e.I\J-+o eollc:ct SOJo<Jplei. D~r-th -Jo wo.fer waS
qs.g~ ~o.)Y\pks ~;le.A cr---Y 07~S LeJi. ~i't-e. a..t 0737
TWN-07 02-18-2015 loo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I I ~T Q~o>.o.rter 1\);j.-r.-.otoe: 20 l5
See instruction
Location (well name): ~.--1 _l""[W_N_-_0_7__;_R;;..._ _______ __J
Sampler N arne
and initials: 17"41\ntl~t"" Holl;~~/'1f;l
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging l._ __ '2...__,_/.:....:l~"--'/_2_0_1....;;5;;..._ __ _. and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump or @]bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: @]2 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event I CJAo-<toc:rb N ~•he~~c Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event ~.-I_P_i~_'Z_-_0_1 _____ __,
pH Buffer 7.0 /,0
Specific Conductance ._1_'0_0_0 ____ _.1~-tMHOS/ em
Depth to Water Before Purging ~.-1---'o:;__ __ __.
Weather Cond.
Time I llSb I Gal. Purged I \'"Z..l
Conductance I z.o I pH I g. '3.5
Temp. ac 111105 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I Z:Zl:3 I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
Time I I Gal. Purged I
Conductance I I pH I
Temp. ac I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) [ I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
I
I
I
I
pH Buffer 4.0 4.0
Well Depth(O.Olft): ,__o ____ _.
Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:~...,.o----il(.653h)
3" Well:. 0 . (.367h)
Ext' IAmb. Temp. oc (prior sampling event)..._[ =g -o __ _.
Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. ac I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. ac I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q , in gpm.
S/60 = I 'l. 0
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 0 t
lo
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ._I _A_W_ft_L _____ ___.l
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients l!J D 100 ml D EJ H2S04 n D
Heavy Metals D D 250 ml D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologies D D 250 ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) r!J 0 Sample volume 0 "t:l 0 ~
c n \o(J'dc. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth L-1 _o ____ _. Sample Time
See instruction
Comment
Art'i~d 0(\ ~~.}~ ,d-\ 1'-\b IMn~ Ar~P.. G-o.rr:n pr~el1t .for r•Yl.SO..i-e.
'R;,~+c=.. b~11 Af HYS 'P\A.Mf'~ 5.0 Cr#-llot1~ of' Sl'>~ L&A.i-~r-Ml~
lol> G-,.n ~r.s 6f ~I w"+~r . 'R ;()_s"' ·tc: ~nJeJ. a-..t 12oo
.YAM f l eS CO II ec. 1-~ J o. t 11.57
Lett SJ'-1-c (}J \'Z.DZ
TWN-07R 02-18-2015 lDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I l ~-r ai.).D..r+cr j\) ;=!""('o...f~ "Z.O I5
Location (well name): ~...1 -r....:....;;.W.;;.<tJ.__-...:....1 %=----------'
Field Sample ID
Sampler Name
and initials:
See instruction
Date and Time for Purging I -z./11!./zors I and Sampling (if different) I IV/.4-7.../)VZOJ5 '---....:....:...:: _______ --.~
Well Purging Equip Used: OOpump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1~..-:&...;..r_l-\:...nd;;..;.~..;...C\S....;;.._ ___ --.~
Purging Method Used: 002 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I Q~r+e.rb f\)1-}.fAf< Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event l._-ri_w_JJ_-_0_1 _____ _..
pH Buffer 7.0 (,0 pH Buffer 4.0 4,0
Specific Conductance ~...1 ...;..lo_o_o ____ _.h.tMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): I IY5,Db
Depth to Water Before Purging I 59,7g Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:l $.by 1(.653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) '--------'
Weather Cond. Ext'l Am b. Temp. ·c (prior sampling event).._l ..._'l_0 __ _.
Time I 1%~ I Gal. Purged I ~j I Time I 1~5~ I Gal. Purged I )JO I
Conductance 1 -z.:vn I pH I C:. .l" I Conductance I 22.~2. I pHI b,IZ:O I
Temp. oc I 1"1.53 I Temp. oc I \4 .53 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) l bt;j I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I l"iCJ I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
Time I 'goo I Gal. Purged I ]-z. 1 I Time I 19 01 I Gal. Purged ll3"Z I
Conductance I 7..7.~0 I pH I c;.n: I Conductance I -z.'L'"i1 I pH I G;.lb I
Temp. oc I 1q .159 I Temp. oc I \9.!)6 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ,7~ I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 178' I
Turbidity (NTU) I 5 I Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate Q , in gpm.
S/60 = l IJ.D
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = l IO .• l 1 I
0
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs A\-JAL
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients 1!1 D 100 ml D 1!1 H2S04 l!l D
Heavy Metals D D 250 ml D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologies D D 250 ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) [] D Sample volume 0 ~ 0 ~
c~'or:J~ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth ._I ...::;b:....:..l.;.:;.,£?~---.J Sample Time
See instruction
Comment
.Ar6 \1~~ Of\ ~it-t; ~l l3Y5 -r;.,ne,... D./I). GArr;" pfe.Sc:,.,-1-' .£(' pur~~ ~na .SAJY~_p);~ .. ~hJe"'}
Pv..r~e be~MI ~+ 13"1~ 'Pv..r ~f~ w~JI .fc,,.. tl\. i-o+AI of IZ t'Vl;,L\1-0 . w.Jd' W4.S cl~r
p w~~ -enJGA GS\r'l~ Sa1Y1p\e5 collect~~ ~t )YDJ. Left S,Tc ~} )~05
TWN-18 02-18-2015 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I \ 5-T Gh'-D-r+e,... Gh loro'f'orm "o IS
~ See instruction
Location (well name): l.._-r_\J_4_-_z_z _________ __.
Sampler Name
and initials: l...,.-oo./\11 ef"" HoJJ ,'J'!!1hJ1
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging J 3/4 / Z.O lS and Sampling (if different) I N/.4
Well Purging Equip Used: [Q)pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: [QJ2 casings (g]3 casings
Sampling Event I my-\i Ch )o.roForrY) Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event I "TWLJ-Zlf ~---------~
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 L.\.0
Specific Conductance ._l_10_o_o ____ _.l!!MHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): l._11_3_.s_o __ _J
Depth to Water Before Purging I sCi. b 7 Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:! ~5. \S ,(.653h)
3" Well: o (.367h) L--------'
Weather Con d. Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling event)IL._IO_" __ ~
Time I I:>~ I Gal. Purged I 0 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I l;Oi.3 I pH I l;:zg I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I 15 , .. l,.;> I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I zz:;o I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I D I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) .1 I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 0 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q , in yrn.
s16o = 1 n.
Time to evacuate two ca. in g volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I :b.qy I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs AWAL
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below) y
VOCs "tl D 3x40 ml D
Nutrients rn D lOOm! D
Heavy Metals D D 250 ml D
All Other Non Radiologies D D 250 ml D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D
Other (specify) 'ttl D Sample volume D
Ch 1oriJe.
Final Depth 1~..-V_._-z.:_:z. ___ ..~ Sample Time
Comment
A(r~V!e.'a on s.~te 01.t 1333 ~M~'
s~tvlple..s. LO llec.f~A "'-t 13.3(,
M} (r,.,,.;., pres.efl+ +o
~a.·h~r I.U~ G l-eof
leQ ~;-k ~~ 133~
c~ Y\"flnLAOIA...) ?v.rYlpi~ Well
TW4-22 03..09-2015 I Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
~
tl
D
D
D
tl
Preservative Type Preservative Added
y N
HCL ~ D
H2S04 f!j D
HN03 D D
No Preserv. D D
HN03 D D
D r!J
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
See instruction
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL see instruction
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I I~ T G V..l).r:l¥ ch lor aFore'\ z o lS
Sampler N arne
Location (well name): I -Jw'1-2j and initials: I ~fln~r Ho li,·Ja!1/nt
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I 3/q / -uJJS and Sampling (if different) L-1 .:...rJ....!/~A...;._ _______ ..J
Well Purging Equip Used: (IDpump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I C.o11 "fi t'h.A.OV.~
Purging Method Used: fiD2 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event Qv..o-r-+~rl.;\ Ch\orotorm Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event ._l--n_w_Y_-_45 ______ _,
pH Buffer 7.0 7. () pH Buffer 4.0 4.0
Specific Conductance L-l_lo..;..o..;..o ___ ---lh.tMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): ._I _I l_Z_.S_o __ ____...J
Depth to Water Before Purging I b q · g D Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:' 3-l.l~ ,(.653h)
3" Well:L-. ....;;.o ___ _._(.367h)
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling event)l._1_o_o __ __,
Time 113-z..£, I Gal. Purged I 6 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I :z 59~ I pH I 6.ZY I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. oc I 1 5.1.1 I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I "'22.Q I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I D I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. °C I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate Q), in ~m. Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I 17 . T=2V/Q= I 3 .iK I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 0
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I.__......;A....;....;.vJ_A"'" ..... 1 _____ __,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below) y
VOCs _r:;;l D 3x40 ml D
Nutrients ~ D 100 ml D
Heavy Metals D D 250 ml D
AIJ Other Non Radiologies D D 250 ml D
Gross Alplw D D 1,000 ml D
Other (specify) l5ll D Sample volume 0
L'h1or;~(.
Final Depth I 73.97 Sample Time
Comment
White Mesa Mill
01"1 ~.-+<. a-.1-1~"2.'3
collec.hj ~>..r I3Z~
11.t l~Z~
-r;.i\(\C,(' ()..(\ ~ G-o.. r r; t1 ?'~'"-LS.ert+
IN&.. ·h,... wo0 G I ea. r
TW4-24 03-09-2015 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
Qf
og
D
D
D
rB
Preservative Type Preservative Added
y N
HCL ~ D
H2S04 ~ 0
HN03 D 0
No Preserv. D 0
HN03 D 0
0 lj
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
See instruction
2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
DescriptionofSamplingEvent: I 1~1 Qv.o..,.{er G"'lor<)Fortv"' ZOI5
See instruction
Location (well name): l.._~-·~w:::.L1_,_·-__;;;?.5:=.. ________ -J
Sampler Name
and initials: I ~llfler Ho JI;JQ;\ /7ft
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I 3/'1/v>.J.S and Sampling (if different) ...VIA
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump or [ill bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: 1][12 casings 1][13 casings
Sampling Event I Qv..~rtc.rl; Cb lorofor,.., Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event .._1_-rT_W_Y_-_Jq _____ __,
pH Buffer 7.0 /,Q pH Buffer 4.0 Y.o
Specific Conductance l.___lo_o_o ___ ___.l!-l-MHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft):
Depth to Water Before Purging I :S 7. ~ D Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:,SO.LJ I ,(.653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) .__..;;;._ __ _,
Weather Cond. Ext' IAmb. Temp. ·c (prior sampling event).._l1_0 __ ---.~
Time I )"2.5 'I I Gal. Purged I 0 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I 'Z.~GJl I pH I b.5C.. I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I )S.OO I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I P·'9 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 0 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate {Q), in gb.
S/60 = I ) b .o
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V /Q = I b 3D I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I,_..:.A.:..\J......:..:.A-=L'-------"
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y
VOCs 151 0 3x40 ml 0 ~ HCL 5I'
Nutrients [1:1 0 100 ml 0 rgj H2S04 rn
Heavy Metals 0 0 250m! 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250m! 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) I:B D Sample volume 0 00 D
Ch lol"ide If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I 7 y. ~y Sample Time
See instruction
Comment
A<ri\Je~ 0(\ si+e oo..i-)Z57
~01'Vlple.s. c.ollec+ed o...t
l...e4 ~1te. ~+ 130~
..,-;_fl'fle.r o.11l G-o.rn'rr presell.f +o co/lec..f-:S,t~mfles,
1300 VJ~ter w~ c.lea.r
C a Yl f-~ Y7 u o v._s
TW4-25 03-09-2015 lno not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
li
2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
See instruction
~~~ooclS~~~~m: ~l~\S_T_Q~·~-~_r_+~~-r-~C~k_l_o_r~d g~o~r-~--~-o_l_5 _______________ ~
Location (well name):j .._ _""'f'-W"--L\,_--=6=-b __________ _.
Sampler Name
and initials: J ::r;:-,..n-e.r H6JI,·J~-::ifrH
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging l.__3.:;::;.:..../.:...:17c.<./....::;'Zo....O..:..IS..~-------'
Well Purging Equip Used: O[)pump or ~bailer
Purging Method Used: ~2 casings ~3 casings
and Sampling (if different) .__AJ....;/,_~=----------l
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I 6-rv.Mlfos,
Sampling Event I Q'""o..r fer{.j .CJ\ lorol"~('m Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event l .... _M_W_-_3_~ ______ _,
pH Buffer 7.0 7,0
Specific Conductance ._l __ lo_o_o ___ _,I!!MHOS/ em
Depth to Water Before Purging I -::z:t;:t-6--D I
Weather Cond.
Time I OK ~!J I Gal. Purged l 0
Conductance I "!;,~ I pH I 7.12
Temp. oc I '1~,9:3 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ~!50 I
Turbidity (NTU) I Z.l I
Time I I Gal. Purged I
Conductance I I pH I
Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
I
I
I
I
pH Buffer 4.0 y.o
Well Depth(O.Olft): 0
Casing Volume (V) 4" Well :11--:0,...----11 (. 653h)
3"Well:_ () _(.367h)
Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling event)J.__'2_o_· _ ___.
Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 0 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Qt in gpm.
S/60 = I 0
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q =I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 0
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ... I_A_\J----'A..:...L.:._ ____ _j
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs n D 3x40ml D tJ HCL ~ D
Nutrients rJ D lOOm! D a H2S04 Ll D
Heavy Metals D D 250m] D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologies D D 250 ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume D 1!!1 0 ~
Gh1o.-:k If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth .._l __ o ___ --J Sample Time I ()g5S
See instruction
Comment
TW4-60 03-17-2015 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill-Groundw.ater Qischar&e Permit ( ( O;~te: 06-06-12 Rev. 7 2-Errata
Ground~'ilter Monbring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATIACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM .1\flLL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWA 'FER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 ~1 QWI..Jer N ~·±r,•.1e 20/S
Location (well name): ._I =-f.......:w;.;../J_-_,£:;..;;0 _________ ___.
Sampler Name
and initials:
Field Sample ID '-l 11.:..:w:..;;lw~\....:_G==~::..:::-~c-=z-~..J9J..:z::..:o...:...,l.f.~....· _____ _.l-rw....,-r;.u _ cz1q z..ol5
Date and Time for Purging I Z./lj holS and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: OOpump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: @]2 casings @]3 casings
I G
I ~ I -rwN-o3 Sampling Event G "'o.c[Gd!:\ t.Ji.l·'} tc; Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event ._ _________ _.
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 '4,0
Specific Conductance ._l_~o_o.;...o ___ __.J!J.MHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): I 0 ..._ ____ __.
Depth to Water Before Purgingl ,_ _t. __ ~ casing Volume (V) 4" Well:r_o ___ -t,(.653h)
3"Well:_ o _(.367h)
Weather Cond. C lc=(;.r Ext' I Am b. Temp. •c (prior sampling event}._l 2~0::..." __ _.
Time I 0709 I Gal. Purged I 0 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I \.L I pH 17.31 I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. "'C 1)2 -2 '1 I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (ruV) I \(~q I Redox Potential Eb (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I li'L I Turbidity (NTU) I J
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
J Temp. °C I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I -I Turbidity (NTIJ) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater A 1 of2 Capturx· tOM.ATIO~[ WITH/'-UU'lir--FUNtTIDNALIT¥
Mill-Groundw<~ter Discharge Permit
Ground.X.;rter Monhori1111 Qu•~tv AssUr.nce Plan (QAPJ
( ( Date; 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Err.ta
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60= I 0
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) l o
If well evacuated to dryness, nwnber of gallons evacuated l o
Name of Certified Analytical Labornto:ry if Other Than Energy Labs ._.I A .... W~A'-=L-'---------'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients ijJ 0 lOOmi D ~ H2S04 ~ 0
Heavy Metals 0 D 250m! D D HN03 0 D
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv_ 0 0'
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 mJ 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) 6:1 0 Sample volume 0 I&J 0 I§
_c h\-o n1 If preservative io; UBed, specifY
Type and Quantity ofPreservative:
.
lFinal Depth I C i ~--~-----~ Sample Time
!
E
:\Comment
· 4 See insrruction
f.:-r ..
DI )~ C\+ 07i0
~----------------~ Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Fit!ld Oat.. Worksheet for Groundwater A 2 of2 capturx-COMPATIBlE WITH.,..-'L.....,zi:r--FUHCTIONALITV
Min, Groundwjlter Discharge Permit ( Date: Of>.06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
I
!
l
" ;;
? i?l)--..-~ "~~~~!MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description ofSamplingEvent: I j!fl"" &Mde/" G'fo~.f'd..'4{hi ZOL5
Sampler Name
Location (well name): 1-rw/J • b~ and initials:
Field Sample ID
Sec insbUctJon
Date and Time for Purging I -z./J~/'Z.¢15 and Sampling (if different) #/A ~----------------~
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump or [gJ bailer Well Pwnp (if other than Bennet) 6-ri.An(\f.;~
Purging Method Used: @2 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event I ~l)..r-\-erlj 6-\t) .AJ ,1 r.,_"fc: Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event l.__-r_I.J._tJ_-_0_~-------'
pH Buffer 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 I 4.o
Specific Conductance ._I _lO_D_o ______ ___.lllMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): I i IZ .5D
Depth to Water Before Purging I bD, 8$ Casing Volwne (V) 4" We.ll:l '33./0 ,(.653h)
3" Well:_ o (.367h) ._ ___ _.
Wenthcr Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. •c (prior sampling event)l~-:'f~"-------~
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I GaL Purged I I
' Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I Temp. °C I I
Redox Potential Eh(mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) L I
'Fime I I Gal. Purgecl I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. °C I I Temp. oc I I
RedoxPotentiaJ Eh (mV) I I ' Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTIJ) I I Turbidity (NTIJ) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater .A 1 af2 capturx· CQM~ATIDL• WITH/'-,_n,--FUHCTIONALITY
Mill c Groundwater Discharge Permit Gruundw;~ter Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAPJ
( Date. 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2 -Errata
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Ql~ in I:,'Pm.
S/60 = I ., j,O
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2VIQ= I b 12 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if olher than two) I D
Ifwell evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated I o
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Titan Energy Labs 1'--'-"AlO""Jf""'L _____ _.
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other lhan as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs D D '3x40ml 0 D HCL D 0
NutrienfS ~ 0 '100 ml 0 ril H2S04 B 0
H~''Y Metals D 0 QSOml 0 D HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 I< 0 250m! 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpna 0 0 l.OOOml D 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) Iii D Sample volume 0 fi.:l 0 .s
C 'hlor;Je If preservative is usl:d, specifY
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Sample Time I:?.J25
~omment
(J See instruction
. :
.__ _______ _.!Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Grour1dwater A 2 of2 capturx· COMPATIIL£ WITH.,/'-<"'o.nr-FUNCTIONALITY
TabC
Kriged Current Quarter Groundwater Contour Map, Capture Zone Map, Capture Zone Details Map, and
Weekly, Monthly and Quarterly Depth to Water Data
NAME: Garrin Palmer, Tanner Holliday
DATE: 3/26/15
Depth to Depth to Depth to Depth to
TIME WELL Water (ft.) TIME WELL Water (ft.) TIME WELL Water (ft.) TIME WELL Water (ft.)
1300 MW-1 64.10 1212 MW-4 71.20 1245 PIEZ-1 64.52 NA DR-I ABANDON
1327 MW-2 109.74 1213 TW4-J 72.08 1238 PIEZ-2 37.09 NA DR-2 ABANDON
958 MW-3 82.71 1211 TW4-2 74.79 1235 PIEZ-3 47.98 937 DR-5 83.25
958 MW-3A 84.81 1218 TW4-3 55.50 1243 PIEZ-4 56.30 934 DR-6 94.28
1319 MW-5 106.35 1214 TW4-4 72.00 1240 PIEZ-5 55.57 1307 DR-7 92.31
1248 MW-11 86.43 1220 TW4-5 63.33 1217 TWN-1 61.00 929 DR-8 51.22
1321 MW-12 108.47 1235 TW4-6 70.75 1214 TWN-2 29.98 926 DR-9 86.71
1254 MW-14 103.38 1212 TW4-7 72.50 1227 TWN-3 38.30 924 DR-10 78.26
1257 MW-15 106.35 1216 TW4-8 74.51 1232 TWN-4 52.70 952 DR-ll 98.40
1004 MW-17 72.34 1221 TW4-9 61.24 TWN-5 ABANDON 955 DR-12 90.66
1257 MW-18 71.59 1223 TW4-IO 61.12 1254 TWN-6 77.65 1001 DR-13 69.96
1241 MW-19 60.47 1210 TW4-ll 91.00 1303 TWN-7 85.93 920 DR-14 76.50
852 MW-20 85.72 1024 TW4-12 44.95 TWN-8 ABANDON 947 DR-15 93.11
847 MW-22 66.90 1023 TW4-13 50.44 TWN-9 ABANDON DR-16 ABANDON
1313 MW-23 114.40 1019 TW4-14 81.91 TWN-10 ABANDON 916 DR-17 65.02
1314 MW-24 113.44 1209 TW4-15 67.90 TWN-11 ABANDON DR-18 ABANDON
1243 MW-25 75.73 1225 TW4-16 65.00 TWN-12 ABANDON 905 DR-19 63.20
1209 MW-26 67.90 1228 TW4-17 77.00 TWN-13 ABANDON 903 DR-20 55.52
1310 MW-27 53.78 1221 TW4-18 64.10 1248 TWN-14 61.56 856 DR-21 101.35
1318 MW-28 75.46 1045 TW4-19 63.40 TWN-15 ABANDON 913 DR-22 DRY
1324 MW-29 101.10 1206 TW4-20 63.88 1250 TWN-16 47.66 859 DR-23 70.72
1321 MW-30 75.49 1223 TW4-21 61.16 TWN-17 ABANDON 909 DR-24 44.36
1229 MW-31 68.26 1202 TW4-22 72.00 1230 TWN-18 59.79 NA DR-25 ABANDON
1228 MW-32 77.00 1230 TW4-23 67.90 1034 TWN-19 53.40
1303 MW-33 DRY 1200 TW4-24 65.88
1302 MW-34 107.96 1225 TW4-25 57.51
1312 MW-35 112.50 1237 TW4-26 65.25
1310 MW-36 110.64 1010 TW4-27 80.23
1259 MW-37 107.49 1025 TW4-28 38.89
1018 TW4-29 73.00
fOB TW4-3U 76.58
IDI1 IW4-31 lli.Z:i
1027 TW4-32 50.49
1008 TW4-33 71.59
1016 TW4-34 70.97
1014 TW4-35 74.31
1021 TW4-36 56.80
1204 TW4-37 60.17
@ estimated dry area
TW4-37 temporary perched monitoring well
+5572 installed March, 2015 showing
elevation in feet amsl
MW-5 perched monitoring well showing e 5503 elevation in feet amsl
TW4-12 temporary perched monitoring well
0 5579 showing elevation in feet amsl
TWN-7 temporary perched nitrate monitoring
Q 5563 well showing elevation in feet amsl
PIEZ-1 perched piezometer showing
loil 5591 elevation in feet amsl
TW4-35 temporary perched monitoring well
~5526 installed May, 2014 showing
elevation in feet amsl
RUIN SPRING 6 5380 seep or spring showing
elevation in feet amsl
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
H:/718000/may15/WUUwl0315 _rev.srf
FIGURE
C-1
, ,, .. estimated nitrate capture
,' 1' zone boundary stream tubes
I resulting from pumping
estimated chloroform capture
zone boundary stream tubes
resulting from pumping
@ estimated dry area
TW4-37 temporary perched monitoring well
__.,._5572 install~d ~arch, 2015 showing
...,.... elevat1on 1n feet amsl
MW-5 perched monitoring well showing e 5503 elevation in feet amsl
TW4·12 temporary perched monitoring well
0 5579 showing elevation in feet amsl
TWN-7 temporary perched nitrate monitoring ~5563 well showing elevation in feet amsl
PIEZ-1 perched piezometer showing
Q 5591 elevation in feet amsl
TW4-35 temporary perched monitoring well
~5526 installed May, 2014 showing
elevation in feet amsl
RUIN SPRING b 5380 seep or spring showing
elevation in feet amsl
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
KRIGED 1st QUARTER, 2015 WATER LEVELS
AND ESTIMATED CAPTURE ZONES
WHITE MESA SITE
H :/718000/may15/
nitrate/Uwi0315NTcz2_rev .srf
,' ,
TV!:I,:1-37
T ssn
MW-4
.5551
TW4-7
0 5549
PIEZ-2
"'5592
TW4-35
~5526
estimated nitrate capture
zone boundary stream tubes
resulting from pumping
estimated chloroform capture
zone boundary stream tubes
resulting from pumping
temporary perched monitoring well installed
March, 201 5 showing elevation in feet amsl
perched monitoring well showing
elevation in feet amsl
temporary perched monitoring well
showing elevation in feet amsl
perched piezometer showing
elevation in feet amsl
temporary perched monitoring well installed
May, 2014 showing elevation in feet amsl
NOTE: MW-4, MW-26, TW4-1, TW4-2, TW4-4, TW4-11, TW4-19, and TW4-20 are chloroform pumping wells;
TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 are nitrate pumping wells
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
KRIGED 1st QUARTER, 2015 WATER LEVELS
AND ESTIMATED CAPTURE ZONES
WHITE MESA SITE
(detail map)
APPROVED DATE H:/718000/
15/nitrate/Uwi0315NTcz_rev.sri
FIGURE
C-3
Weekly Inspection Form
( System Operational (If no note
T' arne W II e D h* ept c om ments anyero bl t ems corrective actions}
-MW-4 -Flow -Yes @
Meter -Yes(f\fOj
-MW-26 -Flow --Yes (N3)
Met,er ---Yes ~
j.300 TW4-19 67.42 Flow I \.o &P.M. yeS) No
Meter 3onE\I uo ~No
-TW4-20 ---Flow --Yes (N ~
Meter -Yes (Nq
--TW4-4 -Flow -Yes QJO)
-Meter -Yes ~
,.._
1414 TWN-2 'J,Z.6.o Flow l~ Z /sP,AA. ~ No
Meter 37 S'l LIT .So (Le) No
TW4-22 -Flow -Yes (NO)
Meter -Yes (Nq
-TW4-24 ---Flow --Yes (NO)
Meter ----Yes (N{_))
~
14\D TW4-25 62.00 Flow 16. ~ &f'_AA. eYe~ No
Meter I o 10 ct 9 4 .10 (YeS\ No -
Operational Problems (Please list well number): Ml..J-4, M 0-U, ·n.v:\-zo1 1"W:\-lj . =rw<-\-Z.~,
r;.v'-1-'Z.l{ A o+-aeCrJ;A.t•el\o.. (, Qi~£.\..v.r(,~ \.~., EN~Je,...A.. t\)e-,y \. ..... <. S ~u !cA. be,_
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ---------------
" Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
I
\
Weekly Inspection Form
Date
Time Well DePth* Commei1ts
\.~Cf MW-4 7D s£ Flow 4.g 6-PJA
1s~ MW -26 -"1_2 • '13 Flow 12. o t.-f #'\
Met,er Litg0.530-41
1404 TW4-19 ..S'LI'-t Flow
152g TW4-20 b'1 53 Flow g _{) &P~
Meter 46025 L.f5
Meter Z7'1ltl-l 6o
tsu: TWN-2 4l.30 Flow 1 fS.Ll &PM
Meter 37ff61r\ 1m
1s2.5 TW4-22 £o. 2l Flow n. 4 &r'.M
15 2z TW4-24 _65.'63 Flow Ji .. ~ ~"""'
Meter 110 '-~37_1 Cjl)
1s;'"{ TW4-25 51r.7 ~ Flow IA.'"lk-~M
Meter rot~-JID 'to
Svstem Operational (If no note
anv problems/corrective actio ns)
(Ye§\ No
f{es No
t(e§) No
Yes@
Yes (No)
{Ye$ No
{Ye~ No
rfe]) No
Ke§> No
d9ID No
(fe~ No
-~No
eve&::> No
CiW No
(Ye~ No
<fe$) No
Operational Problems (Please list well number): :CI.s?'-1-ltt soa.s + (.clpare.r, !'{ sk • .!/i 4££ alv~
:+o fcobls.""""s t+? i tl-""'CM:~ cJ-,Sc.~£.-\ •.-.e..
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): . No j., £;cJ.. M&..iv. +v-~u. to r-e.pc.. .c \ i""-C •
r Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
(
System Operational (If no note
Tl me Wll e D th* 9D1 c t ommen s an)l ero bl I . I ) ems corrective act ons
~~ L.lb MW-4 70.'11 Flow y_.s (,P.J-'\. O'eS, No
Meter :Sbl~2'1 . 3:3. 6'eS) No
143~ MW-26 /..~.60 Flow \Z..Q &()~ t(e~ No
Meter 1.1 ra.7/1 ,3o /?e~ No -
11..\0) TW4-19 66_.Q_6_ Flow 1-z.o GPA (Yes) No
Meter '30il75 7 6. 00 n':e~ No
1 '-t'3o TW4-20 66.62.. Flow ><.t.. 6.P~ .tfes No
Meter 473£8'.03 <fe~ No
1453 TW4-4 10.\0 Flow i I. ~ t;.PA (Ye~J No
Meter 36ii.GO ~\.No
lU.Lo TWN-2 "32.6.\ Flow 17.0 &P.M. (Y'eS')No
Meter 3922..62' I-\ 0 e_re5)No
14Z7 TW4-22 61.\.ctr Flow 1SL D GP,..v\. (yes) No
( Meter I q:3 Cot lf'1.30 <Ye~ No
-=-
llo\2"1 TW4-24 6-il.'iS" Flow n.q M~ (Je_S)_ No
Meter n 1.s,;s 1. 1o (Yes.) No
1~13 TW4-25 ..ss.os Flow I L\. 5 &P"'"' (feS., No
Meter 101~'16.60 (Y'"e0 No
~.50 TW4-1 b'LD5 Flow I g. 0 G-f....v\.. ~No
Meter Z.oil .oo (Y'e$) No
I 441 TW4-2 (O.t) Flow 1~LO 6-PA (Yes) No
Meter Z.&.IS-7. I 0 ~No
14.3S TW4-11 6'i.20 Flow 1~to yPM. tf_e§) No
Meter l4b7. co ~S> No
' -TW4-21 Flow Nc.-t ;A-' Yes l:NJ)) -O{Je..r-&>.. ~ 0-""-
Meter -Yes )<fo) -
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ----------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
(
Weekly Inspection Form
( Date 1 f.2.12lts Name
System Operational (If no note
Time Well Degth* Comments anv nroblems/corrective actions)
_l~.5J MW-4 72. 45' Flow 45 &-PM (Yes) No
Meter ..£f.g'7~1.()~ 7Ve5) No
\441 MW-26 h~-6i Flow I z.o &PM... ((§.~ No
Meter 4~.!:"4.o.lf~ (YeS No
~
141L\ TW4-19 63 gg Flow IZ .0 6-P..M.. ~es) No
Meter 3103t)7 \ ./")(":) (?eS) No
J 1.{3_g TW4-20 6'5.6Y Flow ~-4 &P.M (Yes) No
Meter 4g6~4 .10 ffe§) No
1457 TW4-4 70.04. Flow \\.D 1$-P..AA-tY-es) No
Meter ifi .. '1!07. ry.) (VeJ) No
14'2'3 TWN-2 3V~5 Flow l S. '2. &fAA.. rf':ej> No
Meter .3~11611 .1..\,Q ~No
I LI3L\ TW4-22 _6_3. I L{ Flow J~.o f.., PM ~s/No
( Meter l 'I 5"3~5 .(D 2(e_s} No
14.31 TW4-24 /,£. 2._~ Flow 17.g &P.I"''-. (Ye$' No
Meter 17 ·2.62 2.3. YC> ~No
14.24 TW4-25 90 . i'-\ Flow 1'7,:3 (,-\>.~"\. (fe5) No
Meter I0'12Z.\7. 36 /\'e!?') No -_..,.
I '{S!.f TW4-1 /()_.00 Flow J((D &RM cf__e§.) No
Meter 454Z-.6o (Ye~_)No
\'-1.1.\~ TW4-2 /Z,\D Flow l lis'. D C ... P .J-".. &es )No
Meter ""' ~ . -s2s-c_q-e ({es) No
1~.41.{ TW4-11 13.51 Flow ,g.o &(-l,.v\.. t!{ej) No
Meter :S4!i'S. 10 (Y'ej) No
!:::>-
~ TW4-21 --Flow N ~ + '""' ~o~r-... +; t. ....... Yes {No)
Meter -Yes (1\JO) -
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ----------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Monthly Depth Check Form
Date "r..~( IS" Name W..r'"'""" Pc..l-u-{ T:Mfr tklLky
Time Well Depth* Time Well Depth*
1 zz.g MW-4 ·Jo.D6. 12.31 TWN-1 6.0--:1. I
1235 TW4-1 1().()5 lZ.l~ TWN-2 ::tz..6 B
IZ,'Z..~ TW4-2 ::z:z.4b \ 'Z.~O TWN-3 3'\.0Q
!:Z:~l TW4-3 5$.11 lZ.'-{3 TWN-4 5 :1. ~7
Jz.;p TW4-4 J.O. 9g \'Z.S'I TWN-7 ~.'1.5
)'2.16 TW4-5 63-ZS ll!:i~ TWN-18 5~.68
1:?.40 TW4-6 70.~0 I:Z..!::U MW-27 SJ..I D
IZ.L.~ TW4-7 6 :r .l~ l:?:.S6 MW-30 !S.4(
11:3Z. TW4-8 I l.gQ I~S MW-31 &~-~7
l:Z19 TW4-9 61.17
IZ.IS TW4-10 61.()~
I 'Z. "2.( TW4-11 1l,8.D
t:'cj TW4-12 L~~.Ll\
I:>D'i:. TW4-13 Ll't ,c;g I 3.1 ( TW4-28 ~g.£~
136~ TW4-14 ~z ~1 ~ 1Ja3 TW4-29 :J~-18
I'Z.Q9 TW4-15 (27 .\"Z. 1:200 TW4-30 J.6~J
1303 TW4-16 65'-&: I l'ZS~ TW4-31 ~1.3>
ll.Sb TW4-17 11..1.\Q 1~1~ TW4-32 .5Q.1\
l~3j TW4-18 ~:\-D!l IZ.4g TW4-33 ]\.,30
IJ.J3 TW4-19 6_5.1 L. 12..5'1 TW4-34 1(2.6,g
'~!27 TW4-20 6.5.8?... )3o2-TW4-35 1LI. 25
I~ TW4-21 6 'Z -~6 l::;c,b TW4-36 .S6,li~
I'Z.o~ TW4-22 ~(!). t:t]
124'-TW4-23 67-55
1'20~ TW4-24 bl..o?...
I Db TW4-25 .5'1.00
II.Y:( TW4-26 6t.l.qQ
l'Z.S5 TW4-27 ~o.'Z-~
Comments: (Please note the well number for any comments)
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet
/
'
(
Date -z-/z./ zo '!:>
Time Well Depth*
\-.,1[) MW-4 7'1 . .35
J':)30 MW-26 bg_'ib
·cYflS TW4-19 6760
l3~ TW4-20 7(.. '-l~
tSDi TW4-4 b:,9,93'
~ TWN-2 iS:10
13S7 ~3,0
I~Oq TW4-22 7'1.'-.\L.
1 ~0(, TW4-24 k.b. \2..
J35 t TW4-25 60.lG\
I-t r-i.+ TW4-1 7"' 4K
1::)1~ TW4-2 '7S.IO
l3 z..5 TW4-11 qY.qK
#/A TW4-21 /V/4
Weekly Inspection Form
Name ~r'}cr fb J!tJ1)
Comments
Svstem Operational (If no note
anv problems/corrective actions)
Flow Y.F. G-.PN'\ _{_ Ye~ No
Meter S7.5LJ Zl.\ .97 ~No
-:::;:.._
Flow t·-z..D _(Yes)No
Meter '-\~~qK.q7 ?'Y'e~No
-""'
Flow 1-z.. C) (Yes) No
Meter 3J 097:) '2... o 8' ~No ........ ../
Flow x. l {rf!-'\ (-v_~s) No
Meter 4 qg ~.b ~No
Flow 10.1 G-t'M _('lis No
Meter 1570'; h ( Ves ) No -
Flow ..,., ~m lZS.Y ~ (Yes) No '
Meter -ra ;:· 3~'r~{::.1 N _eYe~ No
-;>=<
Flow n.qo _{'(es..2No
Meter !'172 IC.... b (YeS) No --Flow 1~-0 lY_e~ No
Meter \'13(.,)1.19 (Ye~No
Flow 16.1 (YeS) No
Meter l 072. '-\1. g (Y9) No
~
Flow 17.5 (Ye~No
Meter 702.5.7 (Yes)No
-
Flow 1/.3 G-PM ~No
Meter 19 SL{.~ (YJ¥g No
Flow ~~~.o frP.M ('Yes)No
Meter 5 I Ob :1 (~No
Flow -~~4 Yes(' No )
Meter IV'/A Ye&'"N~
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ---------------
*Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
(
(
Weekly Inspection Form
Time Well Depth* Comments
1 J.'Z7 MW-4 81.2o Flow _'-i . .s' 6-f'#\..
Meter .rgz:z~'-t;,o
1~-1.>q MW-26 Flow 1 tJ , 5 &P ).A._
I '-\oS TW4-19 Flow ll () t-rP.#\-
Meter ·w37_3 1 . 06
1'-IS.S TW4-20 6S'.oo Flow g, '6 f-..PA
Meter 517.csz. 3D
IJ.33 TW4-4 70 7~
Meter z. \ • '2... v ._~o
144.5' TWN-2 Flow 1 S?. ~ t:rrM..
l4.5'l... TW4-22 ;;o ~ <15 Flow 11 ~ %' t,.PA.
,,
IL\4~ TW4-24 65 .i Flow ~ Cd/"\...
Meter 1"1YS'-t6'!..1o
IL\1-{l TW4-25 .5 ~L l? I Flow I 6. c & I' ,.A..
Meter , o•-z.·z..-z.il . 6o
t33o TW4-1
Meter 4 '-137 YJ
t3'2.'-t TW4-2 13.t.lf) Flow · 1 .1'? &PA
Meter i oS~&. RO
J32.o TW 4-11 q 1. -z.o Flow 1 g .o t;-V.M..
Meter £g/ q, 7D
TW4-21 Flow
Meter
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Svstem ODe rational (If no note
any problems~orrectlve actions)
6'eSJ No
~No
("{e~No
~No
(YeS-._ No
~ No
/Y9§) No
lf_es) No
(Yej) No
(Ye~ No
(YeS) No
(Yes) No
(Y_e.Y No
(Ye$> No
(Yw No
(Yes) No
(Ye~ No
~No
((~No
_(YeS) No
Cf9SJ No
{(8l) No
Yes No
Yes No
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ----------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
(
I
\
Weekly Inspection Form
Time Well Deeth*' Comments
\L{(JD MW-4 I '1 '-Ill Flow 4.4 &fM
Meter .<: E f< f<,(() ~I
i~w MW-26 6E-3\ Flow 17..0 &iM
Meter 4lil.s4l1 .o~
I z.'-lb TW4-19 61..507 Flow \\.0 [ANI..
Meter 31 \oo~l. t'J 1
IJII TW4-20 ,t; •-L Z "1 Flow 8.1 &P.M.
Meter 52S47 vo
I 34'-{ TW4-4 ID.'-1\ Flow II-"Z. (d/A
Meter "':"155.J.. "J3
\30F> TWN-2 T:S.o£ Flow jf:,Lj &PA
Meter 396~0'2.
I :11 '-1 TW4-22 ~q .qo Flow IS'.U (,.{' _,v\.
Meter 2.oo '1~3' .StJ
I~~\ TW4-24 6.5.3..~ Flow 17 • .8 f:r.f'A
Meter I 7 530t,i. ~D
\~-1~'"\ TW4-25 ..Sis.ol Flow \5.o b-PJV"--
Meter l~lZ."Z ?,7 . oo
t3Y(.J TW4-1 '"1 \.50 Flow IB.D (~~_,.v....
Meter \\.5<;> \(I
\~Z£ TW4-2 71.'-IO Flow
Meter t""Z.ll ~ 7. 70
13'23 TW4-11 ll 'i. 70 Flow l gcO &f.' A
Meter tss6. 10
'n,a~ ~\Aj ~
/ -Mete"'t---'
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
-LcJJI fote>c..r-b1 Tk>'-1 -~ • 4
Svstem Ooerational llf no note
a~obleins/correctlve actlonsj
d~.§)No
c..Ye~ No
fl_es2No
('Y'e$) No
.=-
(fes )No
7feS1) No
----(Yes~ No
(VeS, No
/Y..el No
rve~No ....
_(Y~ No
(Y'e~ No
_Lf~ No
~No
~e§l No
«._~No
(Y_eS) No
LYIDNO
_(YN_) No
_(Y~No
Yes cf@
Yes ®.a>
/"'fe~ No
("f'e§\ No
VA~ ..r-Jo
~Ne-
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): £I ec.. +r 'lt:.t (j!A s L-..611 <--bee-A A ' 1-: C: e.. cA. ~""""'
"
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
Date :z.l-z. r..l( 1 4
System Operational (If no note
Time Well Deeth"" Comments anv Problems/corrective actions\
li '\o 6 MW-4 ~O.t.')O Flow 4.6 &Pfo"' {Y'e~ No
Meter 5%4 &''l • TZ. (yej No
ogs\ MW-26 65.70 Flow I Us G-PJ"\ (Ye:) No
Meter 4'1314 93 58 ~No
......
0~0,:!.4 TW4-19 f.J3.6o Flow ~ _ 2 &P /A.. {'i'es) No
Meter 312.3~15.00 ~. No
n~4f. TW4-20 64.60 Flow ~.o GP.A <Ye~ No
Meter 54 lo g '2.3 f(eS) No
oct18 TW4-4 IC1.4"Z.. Flow 1c>.o &P.AA... )(8S) No
Meter 4131.-{o\S 40 ?re'ID No
osz.g-TWN-2 33.2~ Flow 18.8 Gf'~ ~No
Meter '1. 60 6._5' \{. 7 0 ('i'e_s) No
~~'-{0 TW4-22 A.Z . 4 o Flow \1. t;, G.-P~ KeS\ No
Meter 'ZO 3D ~.L '(0 ~)NO
OS3'-I TW4-24 bS.zo Flow .I ~L.t"~ &r"""-tYe~..)N.o
Meter II{, 30 "l 7 Jie::, ~s-'\No
C>K2.3 TW4-25 57.~" Flow f.._ c._ (:C~-V\. c'Y'Ets) No
Meter IDrZZ..5CS.'iO eYes\ No -
6GI12. TW4-1 '11.30 Flow lf_g kf'M-~No
Meter \4116., '-1.0 ~No --0'101 TW4-2 (4 .$10 Flow 1-, 3 r~rAA ('(es_."No
Meter i5'374.5D (Yes)No
CfiJS'] TW4-11 qz.so Flow \'l!.Q f-P~ ~No
Meter 11-50.0\ d:e]) No
TW4-?1 --.... ~-law-...., Yes~
Meter --.....__ Yes c:"lSl.a>
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number):
• Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Monthly Depth Check Fof~
Date z_{zL.t/1&.\ Name R c..rri ..-P"'-\t<:"\:§C
Time Well Depth* Time Well Depth*
oq~6 MW-4 So.oo IQO!:j TWN-1 60.7'-t
D'HZ.. TW4-1 ]1.30 D~z..~ TWN-2 33.ZZ.
Q90I TW4-2 ::z~. iJQ I O:f-6 TWN-3 3S. 25
1:3~3 TW4-3 .S!:!.~b 1.:31'-TWN-4 52.65
C2qll TW4-4 IQ.l-{2.. TWN-7 S7.SS
I:!>Zj TW4-5 63-0D TWN-18 fi&"t3 5~.66
D~V TW4-6 7o.3S lOI6 MW-27 5:3.56
1.:13~ TW4-7 ll. 65. 1'·-\ :?,~ MW-30 :::z~. 3$5
1335 TW4-8 7~.3D 1 'i3b MW-31 tS.'36
IJ>I TW4-9 60 .~L.J
I~LL TW4-10 6.'b . fiZ.
6~51 TW4-11 gz.so
~41'"2... TW4-12 4~. 'ZS
I :IIC2 TW4-13 ~9 . .St I "il~ TW4-28 .3S'. 56
I~D6 TW4-14 S 1. 'l o I ~o4 TW4-29 1"2.~61
( 0~5:1 TW4-15 65;70 12t5'5 TW4-30 J6.~30
I 1~1~2 TW4-16 .6S.t6 TW4-31 gi.C>7 1~1
I~Jo TW4-17 7,.60 l~lb TW4-32 l)o.09
100/ TW4-18 6_3.q3 l~!::l9 TW4-33 11. z.s
6~~~ TW4-19 ·6'l.60 }4.00 TW4-34 (0 • .56
Q:<ll'!:i6 TW4-20 6~-bD 1:357 TW4-35 ]4.09
lt21Q TW4-21 61.75 ~~~i TW4-36 56.-6a
o~~a TW4-22 &:2...40
13LIZ-TW4-23 67.~ ~ :i
~~~!::l TW4-24 f.5~U>
6i'23 TW4-25 57-fb
13'-~Y TW4-26 64-8j
1351 TW4-27 So. e:>Z
Comments: (Please note the well number for any comments)
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet
Weekly Inspection Form
Date 3 / 'Z-1 1!\
Time Well Deoth* Comments
151'\ MW-4 Flow 4..6 M'M
Meter &:::>2.'-\. 2..'2..oo
LSD~ MW-26 ~~t.:YZ.. Flow u .. o &Ptv\.
Meter 4 u.s o <L 't i
J 416 TW 4-19 61..~"18 Flow s.o &~.}A
Meter >rz..11.{ l5_oo
t5o4 TW4-20 £4. .. :.>'-1 Flow q,o &PM
Meter !')54 g 7. 7 l
1528 TW4-4 7o. LO Flow ID .O M.-A
Meter ~'liOO. 'lo
tLns TWN-2 )\.'15 Flow ts,'{ ~,..A
Meter Lio31ll&. "o
1 <{.5'& TW 4-22
Meter ZD4.76?.6o
l<.t50 TW4-24 Flow 1 1. '-l t.-().M
Meter t76'lZ.S6 .6o
IY'2..7 TW4-25 57.37 Flow 16.0 lrt'~
Meter lG>72.362. 80
1523 TW4-1 Flow 1 fl .o 6-{l.IA.
Meter tblt5'.4D
Lt;t14 TW4-2 /4.50 Flow 11. 4. c's-f...v\.
Meter 111 f(/, so
151\ TW4-11 Flow 1 K.o 61>.#'-
Meter 7781.'1D
TJAI.ct--£ I Flow ---
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
ILc.elG:.C.-e..ol l....c.Ai '"""'f Is I<JL.f.-'2.
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number):
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
System Operational (If no note
any problems/corrective actions}
~No
l(e$) No
(Ye~ No
/("e~ No
-...,
~No
rYe~ No
/rei> No
eYes) No
C!~ No
(Ye_s) No
(VeS)No
(Yes.) No
6'~ No
(Ye_i) No
~No
(Yes)No
(Yes') No
~ No
(Ye_s) No
Yes No
res No
Weekly Inspection Form
Time Well Deoth* Comments
14Js-MW-4 71:. ,Qo Flow t.t.b &r~
Meter 6oct"l-:z.Ct . 92...
1357 MW-26 70 .D6 Flow \""Z. ... o &?~
12.00 TW4-19
L311:2 TW4-20
Meter 5 6 g-q_s-. o '{
tt.go TW4-4 7o.oo Flow 1 t.o t:Fry.._
Meter '-1'-li'}/ s<o
l.51i TWN-2
Meter 4oT'. 17. 6o
133'-TW4-22 sq,67 Flow n.g-&P~
Meter 2o~$J'4 .3D
13Z.'-{ TW4-24
/:Joo TW4-25 57.bD Flow 16.o Gf~
tY4Z.. TW4-1 Sl.oG Flow
Meter
J4Z7 TW4-2 75 2o Flow 1 'if. o ~__.<A._
Meter 1 oo 61 lo
14os TW4-11
Meter snz. '-1o
T~
____.., Meter "-..
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number):
... Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
System Operational llf no note
any problems/corrective act1ons)
/'7es )No
{Y"es) No
&S)No
~ No
(Ye?;J No
l(e8; No
(Yes No
('r"e~ No
f("es)No
Cf~No
(Yes) No
?YeS) No
CYes')No
(Yes""'\No
(Ve~ No
~No
(YeS) No
;Ves) No
~No
(YeS) No
(fiS) No
?'(ej.)No
/'_Yes} No
-Yes No
~es~
Weekly Inspection Form
(
Svstem Oceratlonal (If no note
Time Well Oe_Dth* Comments any problems/corrective actionsJ
l "3-~ i MW-4 7 ~-f/6 Flow LL 7 r..-P;V~... (Y'es) No
Meter 6' 100,.:; Q' T2.. ~No
~
f<.S7 MW-26 /c_q &-Flow II 5 6,-(J_..v\. (Yes) No
Meter t..lt.fq.5g'; Zo ~No
~
\C...( I.{ <is' TW4-19 hZ.61i Flow i 'Z..o &P..v\.. ( Ye.s) No
Meter .3136r.SS'.oc> ("{ej) No
--...
n:.tq TW4-20 ~3. S'f Flow q~z. f-.R _,.(./~, .. ((~No
Meter .15 ~ z..~ 3 . '-(o (Lei) No
~~~ TW4-4 7o.oo Flow t I.~ ~.;V\_ /Ye_s} No
Meter !;O~~ISLr' ?re~ No
..::::::::-...
fT1,~ TWN-2 z.q..oo Flow i~Ls· &-P.M.. Ct&VNo
Meter '-1110 L{£,70 (Ye$) No
l3'-l~ TW4-22 scr. '1 Flow J~.o &P.....-\. ;Y~No
Meter '2.~ !lL\C\o. t'o (Y~ No
~
134 2.. TW4-24 7q,o3 Flow i '5 6 M...u\... Cfej) No
Meter 17 ~I f.Z.,~. 3o ('rej)No
133.5" TW4-25 _57,5€ Flow 16.0 &f'A ;f~)No
Meter 1072.306. '-iO (Ye_s~ No
-::::::.-..
1'-105 TW4-1 /'l... ~0 Flow 17 h ~P.M.. ~No
Meter Z.0\15 .W t!l_e.$' No
~
\.35-b TW4-2 7£.6ct Flow i 7 ~ U.P!-A-(Yej) No
Meter ?o7~o.72.. !Y'E!s) No
13...1~ TW4-11 'i 0. g_s-Flow 11?. 0 &P_,....._ {'(es ..-No
Meter ~810_ Z/') lfe~ No
i.J:lA.-"+-£ I -t-Flow Yes .ble---
~ -•v•.::aer -~---_.....yes No
Operational Problems {Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ----------------
• Depth is measured to the nearest O.Q1 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
Date 3/z.s/,s Name 0a..r-c;<> Pcz (~ /1 ~ t{oLL~J."'f
System Operational (If no note
Time w ell eot c omments I . ) an:l£ Qroblems corrective actions
1 ... , '2. "' MW-4 lb,otl Flow 1-\.6 &~.-"-'\. (Yes >Jo
Meter ~ZYL{b'Z. Z-5 (Ye_s) No
1 ~u ct MW-26 67.50 Flow 'l-b C,{J_,AA-Lie~ No
Meter Sc>Z .. 5"'t.l OR" CYe~ No
Ji-1515 TW4-19 ~6>.9'i Flow \?'.6 frP/o-A.. (fe~ No
Meter 3142S~Tec em No
~ ,._.,6. TW4-20 /,J ,50 Flow 'Lz lH'..AA-. (Yei No
Meter t-,o IDi 17 ?feS') No
II.{J_I} TW4-4 7c>. '-/ z... Flow I \.t> &P-M ;re5J No
Meter 57556-50 (re__s) No
140/ TWN-2 Z-~.41 Flow j&.O f-r-f/J'-(Yes) No
Meter 'ii571L5b rrel No
:-....
I 1..l1 Y. TW4-22 7l.(')5 Flow 17. ~ &V'.M.. ('Y'eyNo
Meter 2l D t;<?..,'Z. So ("(eS) No -
11-\IG TW4-24 t.:'Lt 4'5 Flow n. s> r$'" _,.\A ('re§) No
Meter 11~1654 .. '\R 6eib No
\'-lO 3 TW4-25 t;) '-15 Flow lb .. D C,.f')A.. (Ve§> No
Meter lO~Z31"1.40 ('Yej) No
14Y2... TW4-1 7Z_ C..f'J Flow 11.4 &P..M.. Yt6S) No
Meter 2.26()'3. 40 aeg No
'-
142& TW4-2 IS 3.1 Flow \l.L.{ &P_.A.-\ {Yes)No
Meter zz.q A'· -z.s-~ No
l'-tz.3 TW4-11 t:to. {,o Flow tf.o (;.p....,.__ fis) No
Meter '1t....J6L\ ll Cf_e~ No
..--~21 ~ I~ ----1--:::---... Yes No
/ ...___ v----Mete~ ...._~~
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number):
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
System Operational (If no note
Time Well Deoth* Comments anv problems/corrective actions}
_1_113'1 MW-4 7 3 .2.\ Flow 1.4 .I. 6-p """-~No
Meter -'"Z.'l o3/,, R, ~No
,.,
\4~0 MW-26 /Z.•-H Flow ll 2. &-P.M. t!l~) No
Meter 5b3.,.q5.5o ~No
<"..
l_S_I!)" TW4-19 k'1 . 4 (jc Flow Jl .o G-PA. (Y~ No
Meter -:\14./S~ 1.5.ou (tej) No
.-..
lL.t27 TW4-20 ~~L3o Flow q_~ G-P.M. ({~ ~)No
Meter i. w-t n ~ tJ6 lfe U No
.:::::..
1141.(5 TW4-4 IZ..•·H Flow 11.0 '"""""' ~ P No
Meter 61~"-"0 ('(ej ~ No
__:-,.
I 1.\17 TWN-2 Z.i'. "}7 Flow li." bP.-IA <Ytas\No
Meter 1.118::312. &.lO (Ye~ No ....,_
ILi"Z.t-\ TW4-22 61.1."it Flow 11.1!: M~ <Y.as) No
Meter Z I Z.OI 6 • .:3D (Ye~ No
" 11.{2.\ TW4-24 b4. 7A Flow _n.'3 (rf,w\ CYe~ No
Meter lllii'Z.l.ct.U::. 8e$) No
\&.tit.\. TW4-25 SI.'-LS Flow I ~ .o t~P~v.. (Yes) No
Meter IOIZY.~~-1.0 (Ye~ No ....
I "4 4 '2. TW4-1 TZ. :z.:z. Flow \1 ,t &P..M. CYe.._cU No
Meter Z4S6'1. Zo &es~No _.........._
\1.\3/. TW4-2 {{,,'-t"l. Flow 1'7' '\ UP/A ("l'~ No
Meter "2.L\\St.7o (Y..es) No
1'-tS3 TW4-11 'lo::n Flow n .1 (rP-"" ~No
Meter .,.S"'IIL -zo (YPSJ No
ITWfi-?1 lftow. Yes No
Meter "--_.-. ......._
... ~ NO
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Actlon(s) Taken (Please list well number): ----------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
TabD
Kriged Previous Quarter Groundwater Contour Map
@ estimated dry area
MW-5 perched monitoring well showing
.5503 elevation in feet amsl
TW4-12 temporary perched monitoring well
0 5580 showing elevation in feet amsl
TWN-7 temporary perched nitrate monitoring <> 5563 well showing elevation in feet amsl
PIEZ-1 perched piezometer showing
g 5591 elevation in feet amsl
TW4-35 temporary perched monitoring well
~5526 install~ ~ay, 2014 showing
elevatron rn feet amsl
RUIN SPRING
b s380 seep or spring showing
elevation in feet amsl
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
KRIGED 4th QUARTER, 2014 WATER LEVELS
WHITE MESA SITE
H:/718000/feb15/WUUwl1214.srf
TabE
Hydrographs of Groundwater Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
-a.
E -.c
.a:: -Q)
E
i=
a.. ~ 0
Q) > Q)
...J
a..
Q) -~ ,..
I z ~
9~/0~/90
8~/H/80
G~/~0/170
0 ~/8 ~/ ~ ~
60/90/LO
80/GG/GO
-
0 c) 0 c) 0 c)
C\1
0
c) v
~
1
j
~
0 c)
It)
~
~
~
I
0 c)
CD
0 c)
"
-c.
E -.c
= -Cl)
E
i=
:I.. Cl)
> 0
Cl) > Cl)
...J
:I.. Cl) -ca 3:
N I z ~
9~/0~/90
s ~~v~;so
<::~HO/vO
0~/8~H ~
60/90/LO
80/GG/GO
0 0 0 LC) C! 0
~
~
~~
{
~.
0 Lt) ,....
0
0 C\J
~ [> r--" ~
~
~ /
C! 1.{) C\J
0 0 C')
C! 1.{)
C')
0
0 '<t
0
1.{) '<t
~ 01 0
~ 0 0
I
~
~
~
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
w 01 0
w 0 0
I ~
~
~
~
~
t
~
1 I
I
)
~
~
1\)
01 0
1\)
9 0
I
......
01 0
I
.......
0 0
I
01 0 0 0
02/22/08
07/06/09
~
11/18/10 z I (,J
~ -CD ""''i
r-CD < ~
04/01/12 0 < CD
""''i
::f
3 CD -= .
C' -08/14/13 3
"C -
12/27/14
05/10/16
-a. E
j5
= -(L)
E i=
:.... (L) > 0
Ci) > (L)
...J
:....
(L) -~
llll:t I z 3: t-
9~/0~/SO
8~/17~/90
G ~/W/170
0~/9~H ~
60/90/LO
90/GG/GO
-
0 c) 0 c) ,....
0 c)
C\J
0 c)
(')
~
~
' ~
1
\
~
0 c)
"""
)
0 c)
l[)
~
~
9 ~/0 ~/90 ...----.------r---,,-----...----r------r----.------,
-a.
E £~/v~/80 -.c
= -Cl)
E
i=
'-Cl) > 0 C:~H0/170
Cl) > Cl)
...J
'-Cl) -ca 3:
CD I 0~/8~H ~ z ~
60/90/LO ·
80/C:C:/GO -1-----+-----t----+---+----+----t----+-----1
(·u) JU!Od 6upnseaw Motaa 41daa
-a. E -.c
= -Q)
E ;=
11.. Q) > 0 -Q) > Q)
..J
11..
Q) -~ ...... I z ~
9 ~/0~/SO
8~/17~/80
6~/~0/170
0~/8~H ~
60/90/LO
80/66/60
-
0 ..¢
CXl
~
0 <ri CXl
'1
~
"~
~
>
\
~
0 <ri 0>
0
cri 0>
9 ~/0~/90
'
-c. E
.0
~ -Q) 8~/v~/BO E i= ... Q) > 0 -~ Q)
r--r--~ ~ ~
1\ ~ '1
...J ... ~
Q) -C::~/~0/vO ~
~ ,..
I z
\ ~ ~
/
~ .__ r--.
60/90/LO
9~/0 ~/90 ,-----,--------.----.-------,----;--------,
-a.
E
.c
~ --G) 8 ~/17~/80 E
i=
llo..
G) > 0
a; > G)
.J
llo.. G) -C:~/~0/170 ca 3:
CD ,....
I z ~
60/90/LO +------+----l-----1-------1-------t-------l
-c.
E -.c
= -C1)
E
i=
""' C1) > 0
C1) > C1)
..J
""' C1) -~
co
~ I z ~
9~/0~/SO
£~/17~/80
C::~/~0/170
60/90/LO
-
0 0 0 0 ..-
0 0 C\1
0 0 C')
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
f::::: ~~
~
~
0 0
""'"
~
~ ~·
~
0
0 1.{)
q
0 CD
0 0 1"-
-Q.
E -.c
~ -CD E
i= .._
CD > 0
CD > CD ...J .._
CD -~
en
'r'" I z
3: 1-
9 ~/0 ~/SO -,-----,------,----..-------.----.----.,...-----.
8 ~/17 ~/80 .
G~/~0/170
60/90/LO 1-----t----+----+----t----t-----+------t
q
N lL)
~
N lL)
0
c-j
lL)
lL)
c-j
lL)
0 -.:t lL)
lL)
-.:t lL)
0
ll)
lL)
~ lL)
lL)
-Q.
E -.Q . = -C1)
E ·-1-...
C1) > 0 -C1) > C1)
_J ...
C1) ... m 3:
0 M I 3: ~
9 ~/0 ~/SO ,----....,.-----.--------.-----,-----.-----,
8~/P~/80 •
c~HOIPO ·
0~/8~H ~
60/90/LO -
80/GG/GO
90/0~/0 ~
S0/8c/SO +-----+-----!-------+------+-----1-------1
0
L(')
I'
0
co 1'--
0 a:i 1'--
0
0 00
CX> 1\)
0
CX> 9
0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
-...J CX> 0
-...J 0)
0
-...J .j>.
0
-...J 1\)
0
-...J 0
0
0)
!X>
0
0)
0)
0
05/28/05
10/10/06
02/22/08
s::
== I (...) ......
07/06/09 ~ -CD -.:
r-CD < CD 11/18/10 -
0 < CD -.:
::t
3
04/01/12 CD -:=
C' -3
"'C
08/14/13 -
12/27/14
05/10/16
TabF
Depths to Groundwater and Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -1
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,646.96 5,648.09 1.13 112.5
5,600.38 02/06/09 47.71 46.58
5,599.99 07/21109 48.10 46.97
5,600.26 09/21109 47.83 46.70
5,601.10 10/28/09 46.99 45.86
5,602.59 12/14/09 45.50 44.37
5,600.55 03111/10 47.54 46.41
5,600.66 05/11110 47.43 46.30
5,599.18 09/29/10 48.91 47.78
5,598.92 12/21/10 49.17 48.04
5,598.29 02/28/11 49.80 48.67
5,597.80 06/21/11 50.29 49.16
5,597.32 09/20/11 50.77 49.64
5,597.15 12121111 50.94 49.81
5,596.54 03/27/12 51.55 50.42
5,596.52 06/28/12 51.57 50.44
5,595.03 09/27/12 53.06 51.93
5,596.62 12128/12 51.47 50.34
5,593.54 03/28/13 54.55 53.42
5,592.38 06/27/13 55.71 54.58
5,591.65 09/27/13 56.44 55.31
5,590.34 12/20/13 57.75 56.62
5,590.03 03/27/14 58.06 56.93
5,589.09 06/25114 59.00 57.87
5,588.15 09/25/14 59.94 58.81
5,587.74 12/17/14 60.35 59.22
5,587.09 03/26/15 61.00 59.87
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN-2
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (MP) Riser (L) Monitorin~ (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,626.69 0.94 95
5,611.37 02/06/09 15.32 14.38
5,610.63 07/21/09 16.06 15.12
5,609.73 09/21/09 16.96 16.02
5,607.08 11102/09 19.61 18.67
5,606.57 12/14/09 20.12 19.18
5,612.45 03/11110 14.24 13.30
5,612.78 05/11110 13.91 12.97
5,611.37 09/29/10 15.32 14.38
5,610.24 12/21110 16.45 15.51
5,610.64 02/28/11 16.05 15.11
5,609.78 06/21111 16.91 15.97
5609.79 09/20/11 16.90 15.96
5609.72 12/21111 16.97 16.03
5,605.69 03/27/12 21.00 20.06
5,605.67 06/28/12 21.02 20.08
5,603.03 09/27/12 23.66 22.72
5,605.76 12/28/12 20.93 19.99
5,598.28 03/28/13 28.41 27.47
5,594.32 06/27/13 32.37 31.43
5,594.38 09/27/13 32.31 31.37
5,594.68 12/20113 32.01 31.07
5,597.79 03/27/14 28.90 27.96
5,595.80 06/25/14 30.89 29.95
5,587.67 09/25114 39.02 38.08
5,592.66 12/17114 34.03 33.09
5,596.71 03/26/15 29.98 29.04
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-3
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,633.64 5,634.50 0.86 110
5,603.77 02/06/09 30.73 29.87
5,602.37 07/21/09 32.13 31.27
5,602.34 09/21109 32.16 31.30
5,602.60 10/28/09 31.90 31.04
5,603.12 12/14/09 31.38 30.52
5,602.90 03/11110 31.60 30.74
5,603.23 05111/10 31.27 30.41
5,602.86 09/29110 31.64 30.78
5,603.35 12/21110 31.15 30.29
5,602.89 02/28/11 31.61 30.75
5,602.75 06/21/11 31.75 30.89
5,602.40 09/20/11 32.10 31.24
5,602.40 12/21/11 32.10 31.24
5,601.70 03/27/12 32.80 31.94
5,601.67 06/28112 32.83 31.97
5,600.50 09/27/12 34.00 33.14
5,601.74 12/28112 32.76 31.90
5,598.60 03/28/13 35.90 35.04
5,597.18 06/27/13 37.32 36.46
5,597.36 09/27/13 37.14 36.28
5,597.60 12/20/13 36.90 36.04
5,598.00 03/27114 36.50 35.64
5,596.34 06/25114 38.16 37.30
5,596.30 09/25114 38.20 37.34
5,596.55 12/17114 37.95 37.09
5,596.20 03/26/15 38.30 37.44
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -4
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,641.04 5,641.87 0.83 136
5,601.47 02/06/09 40.40 39.57
5,604.26 07/21/09 37 .61 36.78
5,605.02 09/21/09 36.85 36.02
5,605.87 10/28/09 36.00 35.17
5,605.81 12/14/09 36.06 35.23
5,605.31 03/11/10 36.56 35.73
5,605.36 05111110 36.51 35.68
5,604.59 09/29/10 37.28 36.45
5,604.42 12/21110 37.45 36.62
5,603.69 02/28/11 38.18 37.35
5,603.36 06/21111 38.51 37.68
5,602.82 09/20111 39.05 38.22
5,602.79 12/21/11 39.08 38.25
5,600.82 03/27/12 41.05 40.22
5,600.84 06/28/12 41.03 40.20
5,598.47 09/27112 43.40 42.57
5,600.86 12/28/12 41.01 40.18
5,595.57 03/28/13 46.30 45.47
5,594.12 06/27113 47.75 46.92
5,593.33 09/27113 48.54 47.71
5,591.92 12/20/13 49.95 49.12
5,591.85 03/27114 50.02 49.19
5,590.49 06/25/14 51.38 50.55
5,589.64 09/25/14 52.23 51.40
5,589.42 12/17/14 52.45 51.62
5,589.17 03/26/15 52.70 51.87
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -6
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,663.03 5,664.94 1.91 135
5,589.52 08/25/09 75.42 73.51
5,589.46 09/22/09 75.48 73.57
5,589.61 11/03/09 75.33 73.42
5,589.92 12114/09 75.02 73.11
5,590.24 03/11110 74.70 72.79
5,590.40 05/11/10 74.54 72.63
5,590.24 09/29/10 74.70 72.79
5,590.49 12/21110 74.45 72.54
5,590.16 02/28/11 74.78 72.87
5,590.44 06/21111 74.50 72.59
5,590.35 09/20/11 74.59 72.68
5,590.67 12/21/11 74.27 72.36
5,590.34 03/27112 74.60 72.69
5,590.32 06/28/12 74.62 72.71
5,589.77 09/27112 75.17 73.26
5,589.67 12/28/12 75.27 73.36
5,589.45 03/28113 75.49 73.58
5,589.01 06/27/13 75.93 74.02
5,588.99 09/27/13 75.95 74.04
5,588.15 12/20113 76.79 74.88
5,588.50 03/27/14 76.44 74.53
5,588.03 06/25114 76.91 75.00
5,587.74 09/25/14 77.20 75.29
5,587.69 12/17/14 77.25 75.34
5,587.29 03/26/15 77.65 75.74
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -7
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitorin~ (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,647.39 5,649.26 1.87 120
5,552.56 08/25/09 96.70 94.83
5,558.34 09/21109 90.92 89.05
5,558.82 11110/09 90.44 88.57
5,558.96 12/14/09 90.30 88.43
5,559.54 03/11/10 89.72 87.85
5,559.60 05111110 89.66 87.79
5,559.83 09/29110 89.43 87.56
5,559.00 12/21110 90.26 88.39
5,559.68 02/28111 89.58 87.71
5,560.43 06/21/11 88.83 86.96
5,560.46 09/20/11 88.80 86.93
5,560.78 12/21111 88.48 86.61
5,560.92 03/27/12 88.34 86.47
5,560.87 06/28112 88.39 86.52
5,561.40 09/27/12 87.86 85.99
5,561.50 12/28/12 87.76 85 .89
5,562.01 03/28/13 87.25 85.38
5,562.21 06/27/13 87.05 85.18
5,562.41 09/27/13 86.85 84.98
5,562.23 12/20/13 87.03 85.16
5,562.85 03/27114 86.41 84.54
5,562.95 06/25114 86.31 84.44
5,563.06 09/25/14 86.20 84.33
5,563.21 12/17/14 86.05 84.18
5,563.33 03/26115 85.93 84.06
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -14
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitorin~ (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,647.80 5,649.53 1.73 135
5,586.18 11/04/09 63.35 61.62
5,586.51 12114/09 63.02 61.29
5,586.71 03111110 62.82 61.09
5,586.72 05/11/10 62.81 61.08
5,586.53 09/29/10 63.00 61.27
5,586.80 12/21110 62.73 61.00
5,586.74 02/28/11 62.79 61.06
5,586.84 06/21111 62.69 60.96
5,586.73 09/20111 62.80 61.07
5,586.98 12/21/11 62.55 60.82
5,587.07 03/27/12 62.46 60.73
5,587.10 06/28/12 62.43 60.70
5,587.07 09/27112 62.46 60.73
5,587.33 12/28112 62.20 60.47
5,587.43 03/28/13 62.10 60.37
5,587.43 06/27/13 62.10 60.37
5,587.72 09/27/13 61.81 60.08
5,587.22 12/20/13 62.31 60.58
5,587.91 03/27/14 61.62 59.89
5,587.74 06/25/14 61.79 60.06
5,587.76 09/25/14 61.77 60.04
5,587.88 12/17/14 61.65 59.92
5,587.97 03/26115 61.56 59.83
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-16
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitorin~ (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,651.07 5,652.70 1.63 100
5,603.34 11104/09 49.36 47.73
5,603.56 12/14/09 49.14 47.51
5,603.84 03111/10 48.86 47.23
5,604.31 05/11110 48.39 46.76
5,604.28 09/29/10 48.42 46.79
5,604.39 12/21/10 48.31 46.68
5,604.20 02/28111 48.50 46.87
5,604.55 06/21/11 48.15 46.52
5,604.74 09/20111 47.96 46.33
5,604.94 12/21111 47.76 46.13
5,604.84 03/27/12 47.86 46.23
5,604.85 06/28112 47.85 46.22
5,604.99 09/27/12 47.71 46.08
5,605.10 12/28/12 47.60 45.97
5,605.22 03/28/13 47.48 45.85
5,605.11 06/27/13 47.59 45.96
5,605.39 09/27/13 47.31 45.68
5,604.99 12/20/13 47.71 46.08
5,605.71 03/27/14 46.99 45.36
5,605.16 06/25/14 47.54 45.91
5,605.10 09/25/14 47.60 45.97
5,605.25 12/17114 47.45 45.82
5,605.04 03/26/15 47.66 46.03
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -18
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitorin~ (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,643.95 5,645.45 1.50 100
5,586.85 11102/09 58.60 57.10
5,600.14 12/14/09 45.31 43.81
5,587.36 03/11/10 58.09 56.59
5,587.71 05/11110 57.74 56.24
5,587.50 09/29/10 57.95 56.45
5,607.66 12/21/10 37.79 36.29
5,587.35 02/28/11 58.10 56.60
5,587.71 06/21/11 57 .74 56.24
5,587.65 09/20/11 57 .80 56.30
5,587.95 12/21111 57.50 56.00
5,587.05 03/27/12 58.40 56.90
5,587.05 06/28/12 58.40 56.90
5,587.50 09/27/12 57.95 56.45
5,587.50 12/28/12 57 .95 56.45
5,587.32 03/28113 58.13 56.63
5,586.95 06/27/13 58.50 57.00
5,587.02 09/27/13 58.43 56.93
5,586.26 12/20/13 59.19 57.69
5,586.87 03/27114 58.58 57.08
5,586.23 06/25114 59.22 57.72
5,586.02 09/25/14 59.43 57.93
5,585.99 12/17114 59.46 57.96
5,585.66 03/26/15 59.79 58.29
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-19
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitorin~ (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,659.59 5,661.36 1.77 110
5,606.17 11/02/09 55.19 53.42
5,606.70 12/14/09 54.66 52.89
5,607.22 03111/10 54.14 52.37
5,607.89 05/11/10 53.47 51.70
5,607.98 09/29/10 53.38 51.61
5,608.41 12/21/10 52.95 51.18
5,608.49 02/28111 52.87 51.10
5,608.60 06/21111 52.76 50.99
5,609.17 09/20/11 52.19 50.42
5,608.90 12/21111 52.46 50.69
5,608.87 03/27/12 52.49 50.72
5,608.86 06/28112 52.50 50.73
5,608.86 09/27112 52.50 50.73
5,608.86 12/28/12 52.50 50.73
5,609.17 03/28/13 52.19 50.42
5,608.88 06/27/13 52.48 50.71
5,608.92 09/27113 52.44 50.67
5,608.46 12/20113 52.90 51.13
5,608.88 03/27/14 52.48 50.71
5,608.33 06/25/14 53.03 51.26
5,608.11 09/25114 53.25 51.48
5,608.36 12/17114 53.00 51.23
5,607.96 03/26/15 53.40 51.63
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well MW -30
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,613.34 5,614.50 1.16 110
5,534.92 10/24/2006 79.58 78.42
5,535.09 3/16/2007 79.41 78.25
5,535.46 8/27/2007 79.04 77.88
5,535.06 10/15/2007 79.44 78.28
5,535.78 3/15/2008 78.72 77.56
5,536.26 6/15/2008 78.24 77.08
5,536.35 9115/2008 78.15 76.99
5,536.68 11115/2008 77.82 76.66
5,535.42 3115/2009 79.08 77.92
5,537.11 6/30/2009 77.39 76.23
5,536.93 9110/2009 77.57 76.41
5,537.23 12/11/2009 77.27 76.11
5,537.59 311112010 76.91 75 .75
5,537.85 5/11/2010 76.65 75.49
5,538.37 9/29/2010 76.13 74.97
5537.70 12/2112010 76.8 75 .64
5537.67 2/28/2011 76.83 75.67
5538.31 6/2112011 76.19 75.03
5538.15 9/20/2011 76.35 75 .19
5538.42 12/21/2011 76.08 74.92
5538.54 3/27/2012 75.96 74.8
5538.60 6/28/2012 75.9 74.74
5538.68 9/27/2012 75.82 74.66
5538.99 12/28/2012 75.51 74.35
5539.25 3/28/2013 75.25 74.09
5539.05 6/27/2013 75.45 74.29
5539.60 9/27/2013 74.90 73.74
5539.67 12/20/2013 74.83 73 .67
5539.77 3/27/2014 74.73 73.57
5539.40 6/25/2014 75.10 73.94
5539.19 9/25/2014 75.31 74.15
5539.30 12117/2014 75.20 74.04
5539.01 3/26/2015 75.49 74.33
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well MW-31
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,615.26 5,616.40 1.14 130
5,544.07 10/24/2006 72.33 71.19
5,544.45 3116/2007 71.95 70.81
5,536.94 8/27/2007 79.46 78.32
5,544.62 10/15/2007 71.78 70.64
5,545.37 3115/2008 71.03 69.89
5,544.50 6/15/2008 71.90 70.76
5,545.94 9/15/2008 70.46 69.32
5,546.42 11115/2008 69.98 68.84
5,546.03 3115/2009 70.37 69.23
5,546.65 6/30/2009 69.75 68.61
5,546.45 9/10/2009 69.95 68.81
5,546.75 12111/2009 69.65 68.51
5,547.09 3/1112010 69.31 68.17
5,547.41 5/1112010 68.99 67.85
5,547.28 9/29/2010 69.12 67.98
5547.45 12/2112010 68.95 67.81
5547.37 2/28/2011 69.03 67.89
5547.96 6/2112011 68.44 67.3
5547.65 9/20/2011 68.75 67.61
5548.34 12/21/2011 68.06 66.92
5548.30 3/27/2012 68.10 66.96
5548.40 6/28/2012 68.00 66.86
5548.59 9/27/2012 67.81 66.67
5548.91 12/28/2012 67.49 66.35
5549.14 3/28/2013 67.26 66.12
5548.90 6/27/2013 67.50 66.36
5549.25 9/27/2013 67.15 66.01
5549.16 12/20/2013 67.24 66.10
5548.95 3/27/2014 67.45 66.31
5548.60 6/25/2014 67.80 66.66
5548.19 9/25/2014 68.21 67.07
5548.25 12117/2014 68.15 67.01
5548.14 3/26/2015 68.26 67.12
TabG
Laboratory Analytical Reports
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: (80 I) 263-8687
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
1st Quarter Nitrate 2015
150234 7-009
Client Sample ID: Piez-01_02182015
Collection Date: 2118/2015 857h
Received Date: 2/20/2015 1 045h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Date
Analyzed
2/25/2015 1853h
3/4/2015 1415h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
E300.0 10.0 55.9
E353.2 0.100 6.41
Report Date: 3/1112015 Page 12 of 19
All analyses applicable to lhe CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perronned in accordance 10 NELAC protocols Per1inent sampling informalion is located on the altached COC. Confidential Business lnfonnation: This report is provided for the exclusive use of Lhe
addressee Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member ofils staff, or reproduction oftbis report in connection with the advertisement., promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection wilh tile re·publication of this repot1
for any purpose oaher lhao for the addressee will be gmnled only on cont.acl This company accepls no responsibility except for Lhe due perfonnance ofinspeclion and/or analysis in good faith and according to lhe rules oflbe trade and of science.
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
1st Quarter Nitrate 2015
1502347-010
Client Sample ID: Piez-02_02182015
ANALvr;c., LABoRATORIEs Collection Date: 2/18/2015 835h
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Received Date: 2/20/2015 1 045h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting Analytical
Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
2/25/2015 1910h E300.0 10.0 12.6
3/4/2015 1416h E353.2 0.0100 0.749
Report Date: 3/1112015 Page 13 of 19
All analyses applicable lo Lhe CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to K'ELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is localed on the alt.ached COC, Confidential Business ]nfonnalion: TI1is report is provided for the exclusive use of the
addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in cotlilecLion with the adverti~nent, promotion or sale of any product or pn>eess. or in connection with the re-publication of this report
for any purpose othenhan for the addressee will be ~ranted only on conlact. This company accepts no responsibility excepl for Lhe due perfonnance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according l.fl Lhe rules of the Lmde and of science
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: I st Quarter Nitrate 2015
Lab Sample ID: 1502347-011
Client Sample ID: Piez-03_02182015
Collection Date: 2118/2015 845h
Received Date: 2/20/2015 1045h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
Chloride mg/L 2/25/2015 2000h E300.0 10.0 27.1
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L 3/4/2015 1417h E353.2 0.0100 1.82
1-Matrix spike recove1y indicates matrix inte1jerence. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
Report Date: 3/11/2015 Page 14 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinenl sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business rnfonnation: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the
addressee. Pri\'ilegt!s of subsequent use of the name of litis company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of1his r.;oport in coonection wi1h I he advertisement, promoti011 or sale of any product or process. or in connection with lhe re-publication of this report
for any purpose other than fo1 the addressee will be granted only on contact This company accepts no responsibility except for I he due perfonnance of inspection amUor analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trnde am\ of science
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2015
Lab Sample ID: 1502347-003
Client Sample ID: TWN-01_02182015
.,,,., vrtcAL L•aoAAroRIEs Collection Date: 2/18/2015 1325h
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Received Date: 2/20/2015 1045h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting Analytical
Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
2/25/2015 1745h E300.0 10.0 27.8
3/4/2015 1357h E353.2 0.0100 1.37
Report Date: 3/ II /2015 Page 6 of 19
All Rna lyses applicable to !he CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance Lo J\'ELAC protocols Pertinenlsampling information IS located on the aUached COC,Confidential Business Jnfonnation: This report is provided for the ell: elusive use of the
addressee PriYileges of subsequent use of the name of thi5 C'Ompany or aoy member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in conneclioo with the advertisement, rromotion or sale of any product or process. or iu connection wilh the re-publil'atioo of this repOrt
for any purpose olher than fo1 the addressee will be granted only on conlacl This cotnp3ny accepts 110 responsibility except for the due ,-.ert"onnance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to lhe rules oft he lr.lde ;:md or science.
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: (888) 263 -8686
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2015
Lab Sample ID: 1502347-006
Client Sample ID: TWN-02_02182015
Collection Date: 2118/2015 825h
Received Date: 2/20/2015 1045h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg!L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg!L
Date
Analyzed
2125/2015 1819h
3/4/2015 140lh
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
E300.0 10.0 84.8
E353.2 1.00 48.6
Report Date: 3/11/2015 Page 9 of 19
All analyses opplicahle to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance Lo 1\ELAC protocols Peninenl sampling information is located on the aUached COC. Confidential Business Jnfonnation: This rqwrt is provided for the exclusi.,.e use of the
addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotiou or sale of ony pro duel or process. or in connection with the re-publication of this report
for any purpose other than for the addr~ssee will be grnnted only oo conlilcL Tbis company accepts no responsibillty except for !he due performance of inspection and/01 analysis in good faith And according to the rules of tl1e trnde and of science.
American West
ANALYTICAL LARORATO~IfS
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2015
Lab Sample ID: 1502347-005
Client Sample ID: TWN-03_02192015
Collection Date: 2119/2015 745h
Received Date: 2/20/2015 1045h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Date
Analyzed
2/25/2015 1638h
314/2015 l400h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
E300.0 100 164
E353.2 0.100 19.4
Report Date: 3/11/2015 Page 8 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to KELAC pro1ocols Pertinent sampling infonnalion is located on the altached COC Confidential Business Jnronnation: This report is provided for the exclllSive u.se of the
addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of iL<> staff. or reproduction of lhis report in connection with I he advertisement, promotion or sale of :my product or process. or in connection \Vilh the re-publication of this report
for any purpose olher than feu the addressee will be granted only oo contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for Lhe due perfonnance of inspection ~ndlor analysis in good raith and according Lo the rules of the tmde and of science.
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2015
Lab Sample ID: 1502347-002
Client Sample ID: TWN-04_02182015
ANALvncAL LABORATORIEs Collection Date: 2/18/2015 1256h
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Received Date: 2/20/2015 1045h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting Analytical
Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
2/25/2015 1729h E300.0 10.0 31.5
3/4/2015 1356h E353.2 0.0100 1.48
Report Date: 3/11/2015 Page 5 ofl9
All analyses applicable lo the CWA, SOW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to KELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached CDC Confidential Business Jnfonnation: This report is provided for the exclusive use oftbe
addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name ofthls company or any member of its slaff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process. or in conneclion wilh the re-publication of this report
For any purpose ol.her than for the addressee will be gran led only on conlacL This company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfonnance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith nod according ln the rules of the trnde and of science.
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-1abs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2015
Lab Sample ID: 1502347-001
Client Sample ID: TWN-07_02192015
Collection Date: 2119/2015 735h
Received Date: 2/20/2015 1045h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
Chloride rng/L 2/25/2015 2108h E300.0 1.00 5.58
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) rng/L 3/4/2015 1343h E353 .2 0.0100 1.04 '@
@-High RPD due to suspected sample non-homogeneity or matrix inteiference.
1 -Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix inte1jerence. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
ReportDate: 3/11/2015 Page4of19
All analyses applicable to lhe CWA, SOW A, and RCRA are perfonned in aC~;ordance to l\ELAC protocols Pertinent sampling inforrnalion is ktCuted on the al1ached COC Confidential Bu.,.ines.s Jnfonnation: This report ls provided for the exclusive use of the
addressee. Pri\'ileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, OJ reproduction of this report in connection v.:ith the advertisement, promotion or sale or any product or process. or in conneclion with the re-puhlication of this repo1 t
for any purpose olher than for the acldr~ssee will be grnnted only on conlacl This company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfnnnance of inspection andim analysis in good fnilh nnd according to the rules of the Lrnde ;md ofscieoce
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2015
Lab Sample ID: 1502347-012
Client Sample ID: TWN-07R_02182015
Collection Date: 2118/2015 1157h
Received Date: 2/20/2015 1045h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Date
Analyzed
2/25/2015 214lh
3/4/2015 142lh
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
E300.0 1.00 < 1.00
E353.2 0.100 <0.100
Report Date: 3/ II /2015 Page 15 of 19
All analyses Applicable 10 the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance Lo t\ELAC protocols.. Pertinent sampling infonnalion is located em the auached COC. Confidential Bu!'iness Infonnation: This report is provided for the exclusive use of1he
addressee Privileges of subsequent use of the name of1his company or any member of its siBff, or reproduction of this repon in connection with the adverList:ment, promotion or sale of t:~ny product or proces<>. or in connection with the re-publication of Lhis report
for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on conlflcL This company accepts no responsibility e.'<cept ror the due perfonnance of inspection and/or analysis in gOt'>d raitb 11nd according to the rules of Lhe trnde anrl or scieHce..
American West
MIA I YTIC~I. LADQ~fiHIIIIf.
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2015
Lab Sample ID: 1502347-004
Client Sample ID: TWN-18_02182015
Collection Date: 2118/2015 1401h
Received Date: 2/20/2015 1045h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Date
Analyzed
2/25/2015 1802h
314/2015 1358h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
E300.0 10.0 73.3
E353.2 0.0100 1.00
Report Date: 3/11/2015 Page 7 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to 1'\ELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnalion is located on the attached COC Confidential Business 1nfonnaLion: This report is provided for lhe exclusive use of the
addressee Privileges of stlbsequent use of the name of1his company or any member ofilS staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisemenl, promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re-publication of this report
for any purpose other I han for the addressee will be gran led only on contact This company accepL<i no respollSibility excepl for the due perfonnance of inspection andfor analysis in good faith and according lo lhe rules of the trnde and of science.
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2015
Lab Sample ID: 1503226-033
Client Sample ID: TW4-22_03092015
ANA l vr1 c•' '•ao••roAifs Collection Date: 3/9/2015 1336h
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Received Date: 3113/2015 1015h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting Analytical
Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
3/17/2015 2054b E300.0 100 675
3/20/2015 175lh E353.2 10.0 69.2
Report Date: 3/26/20 15 Page 40 of 92
All onnlyscs npplicable Ill \he C\VA, SDWA, und R.CRA aro performed in BCC(lrduncc lo NELAC protocols. P1:ninent Mll1pling information i~ locQ\cd t>n lhc attached COC. Coufidcatial Ouiii1C$lnfonnl\lion: This rcpon i!> p1ovidcd forthecxclush·c usc oflhc
addressee. P1 ivileg:cs ofsubsequ~tuusc oft he •>a me of thi~ comp.:~uy or ony m~nbct of its slnff. or reproduction of this repon in connection wilh the ndvcni!icmcm, promoaion or sale ornny product or process, or in connection with the ro-public:nion or tnis report
ror any purpose mllcr ~hna ror the :.~ddrr.'sscc will b~ gntnlcd onl>-on conUI.cl. Thi!'i cmnpony ncccpL~ no responsibility c.X~tlJp~ for the due pcd'orrnancc of inspection oudior 11nalysis in ~ood raith and occllrding to the mlcs or the trade aud or scic:ncc.
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2015
Lab Sample ID: 1503226-018
Client Sample ID: TW4-24_03092015
LABO RATo "H -Collection Date: 3/9/2015 1326h
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Received Date: 3/13/2015 1015h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting Analytical
Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
311712015 2021h E300.0 100 944
3/2012015 1826h E353.2 10.0 34.6
Report Date: 3/26/2015 Page 25 of 92
All an" ly-ses applicoblc to the CWA, SDWA1 and RCRA arc pc1iformcd in acconiancc to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the au.achcd COC. ConfiJcntial Business lnfonn11tion: This rcpun i5 provided for the cxclusi\'c usc of the
addressee. Privil('gtS ofsllhscq\IC!ll use of the nome of this company or nny member of its stniT, or reproduction of this report in connection with the ndvcrtiscllll.mt. promotiou or sale of nny product or procr:s:1, or in connection with the re-publication ofthi~ •epot1
for any PU'l'OSC other LhMl for Lhc uddrusscc will be gnmlcd only on conl.flcl This company ucccpl.s no responsibility cxcl!pL for Lhc dul! performance of inspection and/or nnolysis in yond faith ond uccording to the mlcs of !.he trade 1111d of scico~.
American West
ANA l YT ICA l lAOORATO RIE S
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
1st Quarter Chlorofonn 2015
1503226-014
Client Sample ID: TW4-25~03092015
Collection Date: 3/9/2015 1300h
Received Date: 3/13/2015 1015h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg!L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Date
Analyzed
3/17/2015 1930h
3/20/2015 1824h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
E300.0 100 310
E353.2 1.00 14.4
Report Date: 3/26/2015 Page 21 of92
All analy!ii:S applicable to the CWA, SDWA, nnd RCRA arc P'' fonncd in occordallcc to NELAC prOlocols Pertinent !<iotnplina infonmHion is located on the ouuclt<:d COC. ConJidQnlill.l Ousinc:'IS1nronnnti('ln: This rtport i::; provided lbr 1.ho: extlusivc usr: of the
addrc!Uce. Privileges of subsequent usc or the n:1mc oftbis company or any member of'i1s .stn!T, or reprod\Jcticm ~1f this tcport in connection with the ndvcrtiscmenl promotion or sale ofnny prod11C1 nr procr:&~, or h1 CQnn...:~tion wilh th~ rc-publicalion of this report
for any purpose other ~u1n for the ~ddrcsscc will be grflntcd only on comacl Thi5 coll'lllany t~cccpt:s no rcspon:sibility cxCC[ll fllr Lbe J.uc pcrf'onnancc orinspcclion nullil1r nnnlysis in QtlUd (ailb and AtcordinQ to Lhe rul~$ <If the tmdc tUJd ofsdcn~
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2015
Lab Sample ID: 1503326-006
Client Sample ID: TW4-60_03172015
Collection Date: 3/17/2015 855h
Received Date: 3/19/2015 945h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Date
Analyzed
3/19/2015 2315h
3/27/2015 1855h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
E300.0 1.00 < 1.00
E353.2 0.100 < 0.100
Report Date: 3/31/20 15 Page I 0 of 25
All en:llys~s ttpplicablc to ~he CWA, SDWA. nnd RCRA arc p~rformcd in accordauce to NELAC protocols. PcrtincnlsamplinQ inftmnation is locrncd on the auachcd COC. Confidential Businc.-=.s Jnfonn;~tion: This report is provided for (he exclusive usc oftbc
addre~sce. flrivilcp.:s of subsequent usc of the name oftbis company or any m®ber ofits .s;tn(f, or ~production ,,fthis report in connection with the advcrtiscmunl, promotion IJr sale of::my product or process, orin connection wilh lhc re~publication of this report
for tay purpost: other than for tht:' addressee will be grunlcd ollly oo conlacL This. company accepts no responsibility except for tbe due pcrfonnancc of inspection ftndlol non lysis in good faith .:md according to the rules of the trade aod of science.
American West
ANALYTICAL lABORATORIES
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: I st Quarter Nitrate 2015
Lab Sample ID: 1502347-008
Client Sample ID: TWN-60_02192015
Collection Date: 2119/2015 710h
Received Date: 2/20/2015 1045h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Date
Analyzed
2/25/2015 2125h
3/4/2015 1413h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
E300.0 1.00 < 1.00
E353.2 0.100 < 0.100
Report Date: 3/11/2015 Page II of19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SOW A, and RCRA are perfmmed in accordance to 1'\ELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on lhe altached CDC Confideulia\ Business lnfonnation: l11is report is provided forthe exclusive use of the
addressee Pri,•ilege:'i of subsequent use oflhe name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction ofthi6 TC])()rt in connecaion wiLh the aclvertisemenL, prom01ion or sale of ony producl or process_ or in connection wilh lhe re-publication nfU1is rep<>1t
for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on conlacl. This company accepts no responsibility except for Lhe due perfonnance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according lo the rules of the trnde and of science ..
American West
ANALYTICAl LABORATORIFS
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2015
Lab Sample ID: 1502347-007
Client Sample ID: TWN-65_02182015
Collection Date: 2/18/2015 1325h
Received Date: 2/20/2015 1045h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Date
Analyzed
2/25/2015 1836h
3/4/2015 1412h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
E300.0 10.0 29.0
E353.2 0.0100 1.41
Report Date: 3/11/2015 Page 10 of 19
All analyses npplicable to the CWA, SOW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to "KElAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnalion is located on the attached COC Confidential Busines.s lnfonnalion: This rqJOrt is provided for the exclusive use of the
addressee Privileges uf subsequent use oF the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection wilh Lbe advertisemenl, promotion or sale of any product nr process. orin connection with the re-puhlica1ion of this report
for any purpose other than for lhe addressee will be gran led only on conlacL This company accepts no responsibility e:<cepl for lhe due perfonnance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according Lo Lhe rules of the Lrade and of science,
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Garrin Palmer
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
TEL: [phone]
RE: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2015
Dear Garrin Palmer: Lab Set ID: 1502347
American West Analytical Laboratories received 12 sample(s) on 2/20/2015 for the
analyses presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AWAL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) in Utah and Texas; and is
state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, and Missouri.
All analyses were performed in accordance to the NELAP protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation scope documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
Thank You,
Approved by:
Digitally signed by Jose G.
J 0 S e G ~~~~~=Jose G. Rocha,
• o=American West Analytical
Laboratories, ou, R 0 c h 8 ~~~~=jose@awal-labs com.
Date: 2015.03.11 15:23:24
-06'00'
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 3/11/2015 Page I of19
All analyses applicable to the C\V A, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to K'ELAC protocols Pe11inent sumpling information is localed on the allached COC Confidenlil'll B~L~iness lnfonnalion: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the
addressee Privileges of subsequent use oflhe name of this company or an)' Jne1nber of its slaff, or reproduction of lhis report in conneclioo with the adverlisemt!nt. promotion 01 sale of any pmducL 01 process. orin connection wilh lhe re·publication of Lhis report
for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only em contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfonmmce of inspection and/or analysis in good faith ilnd according to the rules oflhe trnde and of science
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2015
Lab Set ID: 1502347
Date Received: 2/20/2015 1 045h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
3440 South 700 West 1502347-001A TWN-07 02192015 2119/2015 735h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Salt Lake City, UT 84119 1502347-001B TWN-07 02192015 2/19/2015 735h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1502347-002A TWN-04 02182015 2/18/2015 1256h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1502347-002B TWN-04 02182015 2118/2015 1256h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Phone: [phone] 1502347-003A TWN-01 02182015 2118/2015 1325h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Toll Free: [phone] 1502347-003B TWN-01 02182015 2118/2015 1325h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Fax: [phone] 1502347-004A TWN-18 02182015 2118/2015 1401h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1502347-004B TWN-18 02182015 2118/2015 1401h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
e-mail: [e-mail] 1502347-005A TWN-03_02192015 2/19/2015 745h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1502347-005B TWN-03_02192015 2/19/2015 745h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
web: www.awal-labs.com 1502347-006A TWN-02_02182015 2/18/2015 825h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1502347-006B TWN-02 02182015 2/18/2015 825h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1502347-00?A TWN-65_02182015 2118/2015 1325h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Kyle F. Gross 1502347-007B TWN-65 02182015 2118/2015 1325h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Laboratory Director 1502347-008A TWN-60_02192015 2/19/2015 710h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1502347-008B TWN-60 02192015 2119/2015 710h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Jose Rocha 1502347-009A Piez-0 1 02182015 2/18/2015 857h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
QA Officer 1502347-009B Piez-01 02182015 2/18/2015 857h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1502347-010A Piez-02 02182015 2/18/2015 835h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1502347-010B Piez-02 _ 02182015 2118/2015 835h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1502347-011A Piez-03 02182015 2118/2015 845h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1502347-011B Piez-03 02182015 2118/2015 845h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1502347-012A TWN-07R_02182015 2118/2015 1157h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1502347-012B TWN-07R 02182015 2/18/2015 1157h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Report Date: 3/11/2015 Page 2 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perronned in a~cordancc to 1'\ELAC protocols Pertinent sampling inrormation is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business lnfonnalion: This report is provided for the exclusive use oft he
addressee Privileges of subsequent use oflhe name of this company or any memher of its staff, or reproduction of this report in conoectioo witlJ the adverti~nenl, promotion OT sale of;:my product or process. or in connection with the re-publication of Lhis report
for any purpose other Lhan for !he addressee will be granted only on cnnlacl This company accepts no responsibility except for lhe due perfnnmmce of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the tmde and of science
ANAlYTICAl lABORATORIES
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Inorganic Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Project:
Lab SetiD:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc .
Garrin Palmer
1st Quarter Nitrate 2015
1502347
2/20/2015
2118 & 2119/2015
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation for the
samples were performed within the method holding times. The samples were properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD:
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, with the
following exceptions:
Sample ID Anal_yte QC Explanation
1502347-00lB Nitrate/Nitrite MS/MSD/RPD Sample matrix interference and
suspected sample non-homogeneity
or matrix interference.
1502347-0llB Nitrate/Nitrite MS/MSD Sample matrix interference
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 3/11/2015 Page 3 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, ::mrl RCRA are perfonned in accordance to r\ELAC protocols PertiLlenl sampling infonnation is located on the aUached COC, Confidential Business Information: This r~ort is provided for Ll1e exclusive use of the
atldressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this COLnpany or any member of its staff, or reproduction of U1is report io connection with the advertisemenl promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connecLion with I he re-publication oftl1is report
foJ any purpose other than for the addr~ee will be granted only on conlact This company accepts no responsibilily except for the due perfonnauce of inspection and/o1 analysis in good faith and according to lhe rules of the trnde and of science
American West
ANALYTICAl LABOAATOAIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1502347
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2015
Analyte Result
Lab Sample JD: LCS-R76056 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.87
Lab Sample JD: LCS-R76245 Date Analyzed:
Tesl Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nil rate/Nitrite (as N) I 08
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
QC Type: LCS
Reporting Amount Spike Ref.
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC
02/25/2015 1319h
m!ifL E300.0 0,00751 0.100 5.000 97.5
03/04/2015 1342h
m!ifL E353 2 0.00833 0 0100 I 000 108
Limits
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QAOfficer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 3/ II /20 15 Page 16 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfi.1nned in accordance to XElAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC1 Confidential Business Jnfonnation: Tl1is report is provided for the exclusive usc ofthe addressee Privileges of subsequent use of the
name of this company or ally member of its staff, or reproduction ofHtis report in connection with I he advertiscmcot, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publicarioll of this report for any purpose other than for the adtlrcsscc will be granted only on contact This
company accepts no responsibility except for the llue performance of inspection and/or analysis in goot.l fairh and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1502347
Project: I st Quarter Nitrate 2015
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: MB-R76056 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride <0.100
Lab Sample ID: MB-R76245 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nilrate!Nitrite (as N) < 0.0100
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
QC Type: MBLK
Reporting Amount Spike Ref.
Units :viet hod MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC
02/25/2015 1302h
mg/L E300 0 0 00751 0 100
03/04/2015 1340h
m!VL E353,2 0.00833 00100
Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD Ref. RPD
Amt o/oRPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 3/11/2015 Page 17 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are pcrfom1a.l in accordance to XELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonn.atioo is located on the att~chcd COC Conlidentialllusiness lnfonnation: 1 his report is provided for ~he e:o.:dush·e use of the addressee Privil.:ges of subsequent usc of the
OIIITIC of this compauy or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advcniscmcnt, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with lhc re-publication of this report for any purpose orher than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This
company accepls no responsibility exccpl for the due pcrfomlarli:C ofin'>ped:.ion and/or analysis in good faith and aceording to the rules oflhc trade and ofs..;icncc
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake Ci1y, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www~awal-labs.com
C SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Lab Set ID: 150234 7 Dept: we
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2015 QC Type: MS
ReporHng Amount Spike Ref.
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount o;.R.Ec
Lab SampleiO: 1502347-005AMS Date Analyzed: 02/25/2015 1655h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 651 mg/L E300 0 0.751 10.0 500.0 164 97.5
Lab Sample 10: 1502347-011~'11S Date Analyzed: 02/25/2015 2017h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 76.7 mg/L E300 0 0 0751 1,00 50 00 27.1 99.0
Lab Sample10: 1502347-00IBMS Date Analyzed: 03/04/2015 1353h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrnte/Nitrite (as N) 3.04 mg!L E353.2 0 0833 0,100 I 000 I 04 200
Lab Sample 10: 1502347-0llBMS Dale Analyzed: 03/04/2015 1419h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrnte/Nitrite (as N) 13_3 E353.2 0.0833 0.100 1.000 1.82 1,150
@-High RPD due to suspected sample non-homogeneity or matrix inte1:{erence
1-Malrix spike recove1y indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
Limits
90-110
90 -110
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD Ref. RPD
Ami %RPD Limit Qual
'@
Report Date: 3/11/2015 Page 18ofl9
All analyses af'Phcablc to theCWA, SDWA, and RCRA are pcrfonnedin acconlancc to !'ElAC protocols, Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the l!.tt!!ched COC Confidential Business lnf~mnatinn: This rcpcHt is provided for the exclusiY.! use of the addressee Privih:g~ of subsequent use of the
name of this company or any member ufits smff, or reproduction of this report in connectton wit11 the adveniscment, promotion or sale of11ny product orprl)<;c:ss, or io connection with the rc-public01tioo oflhis report for 1!.0}' purpose other than for the aJtlrcsscc "ill be grnnkd unly on contact 'Ibis
company !!CCCpts no rc~:ponsibility except fortbc Jue performance of inspection and/or anai}'SiK in gooJ faitl1 and accOfding to the rules oflhe rradc :md of science..
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Lab Set ID: 1502347 Dept: we
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2015 QCType: MSD
Reporting Amount Spike Ref.
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC
Lab Sample ID: 1502347-005AMSD Date Analyzed: 02/25/2015 1712h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 649 mg/L EJOO.O 0.751 10.0 500.0 164 97.0
Lab Sample ID: 1502347-0IIAMSD Date Analyzed: 02/25/2015 2034h
Tesl Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 76 3 mg/L EJOO 0 0 0751 I 00 50.00 27 I 98.4
Lab Sample ID: 1502347-00IBMSD Date Analyzed: 03/04/2015 1354h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353 2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 2,44 mg/L E353 2 0.0833 0 100 I 000 104 140
Lab SampleiD: 1502347-0IIBMSD Dale Analyzed: 03/04/2015 1420h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrile (as N) 12.4 mg!L EJ53 2 0 0833 0,100 1.000 1.82 1,060
@-High RPD due to suspected sample non-homogeneity or matrix interference~
1-A1alrix spike recovel)' indicates matrix inte1ference The method is in conrrol as indicated b,v the LCS.
Limits
90-110
90-110
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD Ref. RPD
Ami %RPD limit
651 0.419 20
76.7 0.404 20
3,D4 21 8 10
13.3 700 10
Qual
'@
Report Date: 3/11/2015 Page 19 of 19
All onalyscs applicable to tho CWA, SD\\'A, and RCRA are pcrfonncd in accordance to :"\ELAC" protocols Peninent sampliog infom1ation is located on the attached COC Confidential Businesslnformation: 1 hi~ fi!J)('IIt is pro\·idcd for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use of the
name of this company or ItO)' member of its srutl; or reproduction oftlt.is repmt in connection with the advcniscmcnt, promotiOn or sale ofiiO)' product or prl)l;css, or in connection with the r.:-publicarion ofth1s report tOr any purpose other tharr for the m.ltlrcsscc "ill be granted only on contact This
company accepts no rcsronsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or arwlysis in gooJ faith und according to the rules of the rradi.! n11d 1,)[ .sdcncc
American West Analytical Laboratories UL
Denison
WORK ORDER Summary Work0rder:.1502347 Page I of2
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 3/3/2015
Client ID: DENlOO Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2015 QCLevel: III WO Type: Project
Comments: PA Rush. QC 3 (Summary/No chromatograms)~ MUST report project specific DL's: Cl@ I mg!L, N02/N03 @ 0.1 mg!L. EDD-Denison & LOCUS. 4-Email Group; SAMPLES WITH AN "R" OR TWN-60 CAN NOT BE RUN BY 4500, THEY MUST BE RUN BY 300.0.;
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1502347-00IA TWN-07_02192015 211912015 0735h 212012015 t045h 300.0-W Aqueous df-cl
I SEL Analyres: CL
1502347-0018 N02/N03-W-3S3.2 df ·no2/no3
I SEL Ana lyles: N03N02N
I 502347-002A TWN-04_02182015 2/1812015 1256h 212012015 1045h 300.0-W Aqueous df-cl
I SEL Ana lyles: CL
1502347-0028 N02/N03-W-353.2 df-no2/no3
I SEL Ana lyles: N03N02N
1502347-00JA TWN-01_02182015 2/1812015 1325h 2/20120 t 5 t 045h 300.0-W Aqueous df-cl
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1502347-0038 N02/N03-W-353.2 df-no2/no3
I SEL Ana lyles: N03N02N
1502347-004A TWN-18_02182015 2118/2015 1401h 212012015 1045b 300.0-W Aqueous df-cl
I SEL Analyles: CL
1502347-0048 N02/N03-W-353.2 df-no2/no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1502347-00SA TWN-03_02192015 2/1912015 0745h 2/2012015 1045h 300.0-W Aqueous df-cl
I SEL Analytes: CL
1502347-0058 N02/N03-W-353.2 df-no2/no3
I &"I.Amr/yl~r. N03N02N
I502347-006A TWN-02_02182015 2/1812015 0825h 2120/2015 t04Sh 300.0-W Aqueous df-cl
I SEL Analytes: CL
1502347-0068 N02/N03-W-353.2 df -no2/oo3
I SEL Ana/yles: N03N02N
1502347-007A TWN~5_02182015 2/18/2015 1325h 2120/2015 1045h 300.0-W Aqueous df-cl
I SEL Ana lyles: CL
1502347-0078 N02/N03-W-353.2 df-no21noJ
I SEL Ana/ytes: N03N02N
1502347-008A 1WN~0_02192015 2/19/2015 O?!Oh 2/20/2015 1045h 300.0-W Aqueous df-cl
I SEL Analytes: CL
Printed: 2120/20 IS FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M 0 RT 0 CNO TAT 0 aco HOK __ HO!L __ HOK ___ COG Emailed
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1502347 Page 2 of2
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 3/3/2015
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1502347-0088 'IWN-60_()2192015 2/19/2015 0710h 2/20/2015 I 045h N02/N03-W-353.2 Aqueous df-no2'no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1502347-009A Piez-01_02182015 2/1812015 0857h 2120/2015 1045h 300.0-W Aqueous df·cl
J SEL Ana lyles: CL
1502347-0098 N021N03-W-353.2 df-no2/no3
I SELAnalytes: N03N02N
1502347-0lOA Pin.-02_02182015 2/1812015 0835h 2/2012015 \045h 300.0-W Aqueous df-tl
J SEL A1111/ytes: CL
1502347-0108 N02/N03-W-353.2 df-no2/no3
J SELAnalytes: N03N02N
1502347-0JIA Piez-03_02182015 2/18/2015 0845h 2/2012015 1045h 300.0-W Aqueous df-cl
I ~61, AJt~I'.Y=: CL
1502347-0118 N02/N03-W-353.2 df ... oi/nn3.
I SELAna/ytes: N03N02N
1502347-012A 'IWN-07R_02182015 2/18/2015 1157h 2/20/2015 1045b 300.0-W Aqueous df-cl
I SEL Ana lyles: CL
1502347-0128 N02/N03-W-353.2 df-no21lm3
1 SELAnalytes: N03N02N
Printed: 2/2012015 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY (fill oul on page 1]: %M 0 RT 0 CN 0 TAT 0 QC 0 HOK __ HOI\__ HOK __ . COC Emh~L----
American West
Analytical Laboratories
463 W. 3800 S Sal( Lake Cily, UT 64115
Phu '1e # [phone] Toll Free# (BBB) 263-8686 -Fa.<#. 1601)263-8687 Email awal@aw&l-'abs com
www,awal·~abs cotn
Client: Energy Fuels Resourees, Jne.
Address: 6425 S. Hwy. 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Con lac\: Gartin Palmer
Phone#: [phone] CeM#: .~~[e-mail] KWdile(*oergyfuit&.com.;
Email: dtur~nerg:fn.el.s.com
Project Name: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2015
Proj6ct#:
PO#:
Sampler Name: Tanner Holliday
Date
Somp!<>ID: Samoled
1 T'Wtf·07_0:21920lS 2/19/2016
I TWN·04_021820l.S 2/18/2016
, T'Wl't-01_02182015 2/18/2015
• TWN·18_02182016 2/18/2015
' TWN-03_02192015 2/19/2015
I TWN-02_02182016 2/18/2015
I TW'lf-66_02182016 2/18/2016
.a TWN·60_02192015 2/19/2015
t Piez.01_0218201S 2/18/2015
n Piez-02_02182015 2/18/2016
Plez-03_02182015 2/18/2015
I TWN-07R,021U015 2/18/2015
" l:"""r" Gj:J.. .;: HJ:!AA-.. z.flqho;:
1'1!-ICINIK-G-n.r":~ p.,_\...,....,--,..,,.. IZ.:SO
r;.:::-·"'· ..
llmc .....,,_
lj(~nqui$h00oy: ~· 1go!1tur11 , .....
PrintN,me:
ltllflqi.UilildDy: c,_
Sl!}l1fllur•
1me: !.-><-
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
All anal~ will bo rond~,:~ udng NELAP acotlldiled methods ~nd all d11l11oMII be reported Uflog AW/>J....'s &landwd ar.alyto hM9 and reporlloo
hmiiA',"'.:M.)unluZ"'!Iplleirir.allyrequost..tDlh9rw!Monthi•ChalnofCU91odysnd/ora11!1Ch!lddocuroenlalion ' AWAL lab Sample Sel #
p 1 ,,. ,, I
I QC Level: Tum Around Time: U."'-utNir arrangertNn<& ~vo '-:, m~F~. IOU.Om.e! I a.gnedreports~•J:-:,amllledl., .dlOpmon
3 Standard ohed~lhoyl!f\.·oiJII
X Include EOO: l!b<f~!"Y'_ll ... ~¥
LOCUS UPLOAD I'?&.EJ_ -X. EXCEL
Field Filler&d For:
··~ _ ....... , ·e ..... ~ Ftl' Compliance With: a NElAP • ,......,..;. .Z.-L _ ..
0 RCRA :J CWA • RMoAI~ft ...........
0 SDWA .....o.r.~ 0 ELAP/A2L.A
0' 0 NLLAP " g 0 Non-Comp~;:mce 'de-~ 0 Other: "' ~ j !2. "' II . --.-_,.,._,_' ,g ~ "' 0 -· ' ~ 0 0 Known Hazards • ·1'-<.ii!-8 -! ~ "' Time " !t & ,-0-
Samoled 0 ~ 0 tl Sam le Comments -.~ ~ ,, "' .
735 l " X X
1256 2 '" X X \ooor-w ..
1325 ' " X X 1~41\Cul"'fl~
1401 ' .. X X
t1) .. -..... :-ryl'I'(M~•Il
745 ' ~ X X :'C: • '"
825 ~ .. X I X
I ro-~·e "( -~ '"' 1325 ~ .. X X '· I .,_,.,..,._...,.. .{'0~· 710 ;) "' X X . ~ ' -
-
857 ~ .. X X ;,_ .
835 2 lv X X ...... "Z'""~~0 ~
845 ' w X X
1157 2 " .. X
,=:·) ~<'-Speciallnstroctions: ......
J>rintName:
~=·rrr .,_
rM•
PrlniN•m11:
1:"~.€1111. ca. _/ -"-J.~,.6ks
,,.,..._L/,1. ..!:L.JS _/ ,_ /Nts-
"""'"""'' I :1 ..
Slgnahlr11
~rtitftn_,ll'r. !T'm•
Analysis
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
N0_1 &NOJ
O &G
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TPO
Procedure:
Frequency:
Preservation Check Sheet
Sample Set JI.J(Icn.:slon and pll
Preservative I '2... 3 Lj S" G
EH <2H2so.
pH <2 H2-so.
pH>12
NaOH
pH<2HNOl
pH<2H2so. y'e1 r/~ v-r v~5 ~r lt.r
pH<2HCL /
£H<2 H"'SO,
pH>9NaOH,
Zn Acetate
pH <2 H_2so.
pH <2 HLSO•
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from Lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
7 &--9
vet YeJ \.i• /
In /1
yb lK'
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
If sample is not preserved, properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag COC, notify client if requested
Place client conversation on COC
Samples may be adjusted
All samples requiring preservation
+ ...
#
•
The sample required additional preservative upon receipt.
The sample was received unpreserved
The Sample was received unpreserved and therefore preserved upon receipt .
The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH< 2 due to the sample matrix
The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH> __ due to the sample matrix interference
LabSetiD: /S 0 2.3 7')
/7_
Yc5
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: (80 I) 263-8687
e-mail: awa\@awal-labs.com
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Garrin Palmer
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
TEL: [phone]
RE: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2015
Dear Garrin Palmer: Lab Set ID: 1503226
American West Analytical Laboratories received 37 sample(s) on 3/13/2015 for the
analyses presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AW AL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) in Utah and Texas; and is
state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, and Missouri.
All analyses were performed in accordance to the NELAP protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation scope documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
Thank You,
Approved by:
Digitally signed by Jose G.
J 0 S e G ' ~~~~~=Jose G. Rocha,
• o=American West Analytical
Laboratories, au, R 0 c h a.. ~~~[e-mail].
Date: 2015.03.2711:01:24
-06'00'
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 3/26/2015 Page I of92
All &tMiy~~fi ~pp\it:Qh\c to tb~ CWAt SDWA, nnd RC:RA urc rcrlbmtcd in tlccord!lncc to Nl;LAC protocol~. P~n.incnt stunpling lurQ[motitm is h:w:atcrJ on the au~th~d COC. Confidcll\ial Ilusincss ln(onnnlion: This report is pnwidcd f'or the c;:xchJsiv~ u~ aft he
addt~ii$CQ. rrivil~~s Q( ii'tb~<Jll~nt usc of Lh~ IHHne Qr this compuny or Ill\)' member of its ~tCitT, or reproduclion M this rcpO(l ill c::om1ectiou wHh lbe ndverti&<:me:nL. prom~)tion or sale or any product or pmccs.~. or in conneotion with lhe ~publiemion M1hi.s fl:.port
f\Jr any JlUrpo~c olhcr thtm fllr Lh~ llddl-csl!c::c will be gmnt(:d cmly on ~•lnlac;t This company occcplti no responsibility cxc~pl r-.>r the du~ pcrfnnnuncc ofills~ction nud/ol' IU'Inlysi:~ in QClud faith ond accnrding to th1.1 n1les of the 1radc ;1nd ol':t'ciCnC~:.
SAMPLE SUMMARY
American West Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
ANAl YTIC Al LAE3 0 RATORIES Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2015
Lab Set ID: 1503226
Date Received: 3/13/2015 1015h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date CoHected Matrix Analysis
3440 South 700 West 1503226-001A TW4-03R_03102015 3/10/2015 755h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Salt Lake City, UT 84119 1503226-001B TW4-03R 03102015 3/10/2015 755h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1503226-001C TW4-03R_03102015 3/10/2015 755h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Phone: [phone] 1503226-002A TW4-03 03112015 3/11/2015 746h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1503226-002B TW4-03 03112015 3111/2015 746h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Toll Free: [phone] 1503226-002C TW4-03 03112015 311112015 746h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Fax: [phone]C/5030C
e-mail: [e-mail] 1503226-003A TW4-12 03112015 3/11/2015 757h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1503226-003B TW4-12 03112015 3111/2015 757h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
web: www.awal-labs.com 1503226-003C TW4-12 03112015 3111/2015 757h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1503226-004A TW4-28_03112015 3/11/2015 804h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Kyle F. Gross 1503226-004B TW4-28 03112015 3/11/2015 804h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1503226-004C TW4-28 03112015 3/11/2015 804h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Laboratory Director 8260C/5030C
1503226-005A TW4-32 03112015 3/11/2015 810h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Jose Rocha 1503226-005B TW4-32 03112015 3/11/2015 810h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
QA Officer 1503226-005C TW4-32 03112015 3111/2015 810h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1503226-006A TW4-13 03112015 3111/2015 817h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1503226-006B TW4-13_03112015 3111/2015 817h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1503226-006C TW4-13_03112015 3111/2015 817h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1503226-007 A TW4-36 03112015 3/11/2015 823h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1503226-007B TW4-36_03112015 3/11/2015 823h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1503226-007C TW4-36 03112015 3111/2015 823h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1503226-008A TW4-27_03112015 3/11/2015 830h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1503226-008B TW4-27 _03112015 3/11/2015 830h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1503226-008C TW4-27_03112015 3/11/2015 830h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1503226-009A TW4-30 03112015 3/11/2015 835h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1503226-009B TW4-30 03112015 3/11/2015 835h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1503226-009C TW4-30_03112015 3/11/2015 835h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1503226-01 OA TW4-31_03112015 311112015 841h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1503226-010B TW4-31 03112015 3111/2015 841h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Report Date: 3/26/2015 Page 2 of92
All ennly~"'~ oppli~~hh: to ~h~ CWA) SDWA, t'lt'ld RCRA ore p~rfonn-cd in ncC'ordont:c to NELAC proweols Pcrtincnt:;::uupling i11fonno~km is loci\ led on I he IIUr.u;hcd COC. Conlirlcn~inl l'i\l~incs~ lnfmmnlion: This report is plllvidtJd for I he exclusive Ul'lc of1l1c
tlddrc~~e. Pl'tvik~-ts Qr~tlbS~\ICtl~ usc oflh~ 11\lm~ orthi.s ..:mnpany (1f tl.UY mt'mb~r ot'ils stnrr, or rcptudliCLion of lUis tepon in c()nneclion with the ncJ\'~ru~cmonl. pro1110Lion m· ~~~of any product or proccs:~, or in connection with the rc-puhlication ofdti~ rCf11111
fl~T ~ny purpn~c olh~r Lh;Ul ftn 1h~ addrlil'llitC will b1.' grnot~d only on cnutp,ct. This compony ncccpt.!; no r"~ponsibility ~xu~o~pl rLlr 1bc dt.~c p¢tlbmumc~ nr in;pccLiotl undlor nn~~ly!li~ in uQod foit.lt and according to tb1.1 n1lcs oflhc uadc 1H1d ol' sclcnc~.
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2015
Lab Set ID: 1503226
Date Received: 3/13/2015 1015h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
1503226-01 oc TW4-31_03112015 3111 /2015 841h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
3440 South 700 West 8260C/5030C
1503226-011 A TW4-34_03112015 3/1112015 847h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Salt Lake City, UT 84119 1503226-0llB TW4-34_03112015 3/1112015 847h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1503226-011 c TW4-34_03112015 3/11/2015 847h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1503226-0 12A TW4-35_03112015 3/1112015 853h Aqueous Anions, E300.0 Phone: (80 I) 263-8686 1503226-0 12B TW4-35_03112015 311112015 853h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Toll Free: [phone] 1503226-012C TW4-35_03112015 3/1112015 853h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Fax: (80 I) 263-8687 8260C/5030C
e-mail: [e-mail] 1503226-0 13A TW4-23 03122015 3/12/2015 703h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1503226-013B TW4-23_03122015 3/12/2015 703h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
web: www.awal-labs.com 1503226-0 13C TW4-23 03122015 3/12/2015 703h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1503226-014A TW4-25_03092015 3/9/2015 1300h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1503226-014B TW4-25 03092015 3/9/2015 1300h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2 Kyle F. Gross 1503226-0 14C TW4-25 03092015 3/9/2015 1300h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Laboratory Director 8260C/5030C
1503226-015A TW4-14 03122015 3/12/2015 712h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Jose Rocha 1503226-015B TW4-14 03122015 3112/2015 712h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
QA Officer 1503226-0 15C TW4-14_03122015 3/12/2015 712h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1503226-016A TW4-26 03122015 3/12/2015 720h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1503226-0 16B TW4-26_03122015 3/12/2015 720h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1503226-0 16C TW4-26_03122015 3/12/2015 720h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1503226-017 A TW4-05 03122015 3/12/2015 728h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1503226-0 17B TW4-05_03122015 3/12/2015 728h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1503226-017C TW4-05_03122015 3/12/2015 728h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1503226-0 18A TW4-24 03092015 3/9/2015 1326h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1503226-0 18B TW4-24 03092015 3/9/2015 1326h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1503226-0 18C TW4-24_03092015 3/9/2015 1326h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1503226-019 A TW4-18 03122015 3/12/2015 738h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1503226-0 19B TW4-18 03122015 3/12/2015 738h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1503226-0 19C TW4-18 03122015 3/12/2015 738h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1503226-020A TW4-09_03122015 3/12/2015 747h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1503226-020B TW4-09_03122015 3/12/2015 747h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Report Date: 3/26/2015 Page3 of92
Allllulll~c~ nppli~.:.hlc 10 1hc CWA, SDWA1 n11d RCRA em:. pC'rronncd ill DC(;ordonc..: to NELAC' prmoools. P~:nincnt sampliny infonntnion i~ locn~.cd on the BI-Wlchcd COC. tonndcntiltl Businc~~ lnnmnnlion: Thi:~ rcpon i~ provid~.:d fnr the cxr:l115h~ u,;c llfthc
addressee. Privile1.1c~ of.~uh:<~cqucm usc of the nom~ oft hi~ c:omp.any or un:--m~mh~:~t or ils stnll, 11r reproduction of this r~port in connection with the ndvcr1isc111~:nl.. prommion or Sllle of rmy J'lr{lduct or process, or in conn~.:~;tion with the rc-publi~IUion oflhh ro[lm1
f1n ;,~n~ purpus~ uth~r thr1u for lh~ ~ddrcssot: will b~ grnntcU only 1\n L:t)n\OCh This ~·omrany 1\t;C~ll.'i n~' ro:-sponsibility OXL:I.l).H for lbc Juc pcrform;,ncc nrin~(X'Ction illlL.IIOI' oM lysis ln good foilh end Dt:~;ording to the n1lcs of the !rude 3nd of sdcnC'l.'.
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2015
Lab Set ID: 1503226
ANAL)ITIC AL l~BORA10RIES Date Received: 3/13/2015 1015h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
1503226-020C TVV4-09_03122015 3/12/2015 747h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
3440 South 700 VVest 8260C/5030C
1503226-021A TVV4-33_03122015 3/12/2015 755h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Salt Lake City, UT 84119 1503226-0218 TVV4-33 03122015 3/12/2015 755h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1503226-021 c TVV4-33 03122015 3/12/2015 755h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1503226-022A TVV4-08_03122015 3/12/2015 803h Aqueous Anions, E300.0 Phone: (80 l) 263-8686 1503226-022B TVV 4-08 _031220 15 3/12/2015 803h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Toll Free: [phone] 1503226-022C TVV4-08_03122015 3/12/2015 803h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Fax: [phone]C/5030C
e-mail: [e-mail] 1503226-023A TVV4-21_03122015 3/12/2015 811h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1503226-023B TVV4-21_03122015 3/12/2015 811h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
web: www.awal-labs.com 1503226-023C TVV4-21 03122015 3/12/2015 8llh Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1503226-024A TVV4-29 03122015 3/12/2015 821h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1503226-024B TVV4-29 _03122015 3/12/2015 821h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2 Kyle F. Gross 1503226-024C TVV4-29 03122015 3/12/2015 821h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Laboratory Director 8260C/5030C
1503226-025A TVV4-16_03122015 3/12/2015 830h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Jose Rocha 1503226-025B TVV4-16_03122015 3/12/2015 830h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
QA Officer 1503226-025C TVV4-16_03122015 3/12/2015 830h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1503226-026A TVV4-11_03092015 3/9/2015 1408h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1503226-026B TVV4-11_03092015 3/9/2015 1408h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1503226-026C TVV4-11_03092015 3/9/2015 1408h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1503226-027 A TVV4-04_03092015 3/9/2015 1453h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1503226-027B TVV4-04_03092015 3/9/2015 1453h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1503226-027C TVV4-04_03092015 3/9/2015 1453h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1503226-028A TVV4-01_03092015 3/9/2015 1443h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1503226-028B TVV4-01_03092015 3/9/2015 1443h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1503226-028C TVV4-01_03092015 3/9/2015 1443h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1503226-029A MVV-04 03092015 3/9/2015 1437h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1503226-029B MVV-04_03092015 3/9/2015 1437h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1503226-029C MVV-04_03092015 3/9/2015 1437h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1503226-030A MVV-26_03092015 3/9/2015 1400h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1503226-030B MVV-26_03092015 3/9/2015 1400h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Report Date: 3/26/2015 Page 4 of92
All snnl>-sn ~I'IJUioh~ '" lh\l CWA, SDWA. und RCRA . pctrouttetl in ~t'~Nam:o lO NtLAC protoctlls. Pcr\incnt ~umpling mf1IT11ll.l'io,, J; ~at.cd tln tht MUlched COt ~m~&onu.a' ~~•lnas lnl\wm;uton· This ftt .. HIIa. l)flWt*t\ fhtll!ooclusi\'c ul'ic or the
uddrc~see. f'ntlk~<' ur,a.t~b~cquem usc of lh~ nomc orlhl)f't'ltllplll.l.)l oJr llrly member ofhs .smtT, or rcprod\lctit.1n tlflhis report in twll\td,oi\ wrtb tl!e ndvcrtiscmont. prou •UCIU w ...,k \\CQI'!t flludun Hr 1~ or in ('\'U'I'I«1~tn '.It Ill \lk'f'C'1"'1h\•,··tion of thb repon
fM "n)' purp,1w nl 1han fur the-adttn:,~cc willlx: gr~nt<•t ._,111) on contact Thi~ com~ny n<:t:qJts no rt:Sf'IOO!iibiliry cxc\!pl ftlr the.~ rfim»rrtU!c of iJl.spection rmdfor wl,t•ln "'-''IJJ fiilh Jt1d tct\MLfttw ~~ th~ ndt..'.t orthr: utMl•nd nr •th~nt~ ...
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 20 15
Lab Set ID: 1503226
A~~A LV TlC Al LADORATO RIES Date Received: 3/13/2015 1015h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
1503226-030C MW-26 03092015 3/9/2015 1400h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
3440 South 700 West 8260C/5030C
1503226-031A TW4-02_03092015 3/9/2015 1427h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Salt Lake City, UT 84119 1503226-031 B TW4-02 03092015 3/9/2015 1427h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1503226-031C TW4-02_03092015 3/9/2015 1427h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1503226-032A TW4-19_03092015 3/9/2015 1200h Aqueous Anions, E300.0 Phone: [phone] 1503226-0328 TW4-19 03092015 3/9/2015 1200h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Toll Free: [phone] 1503226-032C TW4-19 03092015 3/9/2015 1200h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Fax: [phone]C/5030C
' e-mail: [e-mail] 1503226-033A TW4-22_03092015 3/9/2015 1336h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1503226-033B TW4-22_03092015 3/9/2015 1336h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
web: www.awal-labs.com 1503226-033C TW4-22 03092015 3/9/2015 1336h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1503226-034A TW4-20 03092015 3/9/2015 1350h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1503226-0348 TW4-20 03092015 3/9/2015 1350h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2 Kyle F. Gross 1503226-034C TW4-20 03092015 3/9/2015 1350h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Laboratory Director 8260C/5030C
1503226-035A TW4-65_03112015 3/11/2015 810h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Jose Rocha 1503226-0358 TW4-65_03112015 3/11/2015 810h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
QA Officer 1503226-035C TW4-65 03112015 3/11/2015 810h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1503226-036A TW4-70_03122015 3/12/2015 728h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1503226-0368 TW4-70~03122015 3/12/2015 728h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1503226-036C TW4-70 03122015 3112/2015 728h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1503226-037 A Trip Blank 3/9/2015 Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Report Date: 3/26/2015 Page 5 of92
Allenaly:;c., rl.f'lplico.bktolhc CWA, SDWA, nnd RCRA art p~rf01mcd i" IH.::t:ordancc lo NELAC protocol;o;. P.;"rlincnl si\mpling infonnalion is located on the auached COC. Confid~ntial Ousinc:!ls lnfonn"tion: Thi~ rcpon is pnwid~d for the cx<.:lusivc usc ofLhc
oddre!'isc:c. Privilc2t~ of:mb~Qlll!rH use of Lhe name orthis c(uup.·m)' or nny roc::mbcr of its stn!T. or reprodltction ol'lhi.~ ~rxm in connection with Lhc od'>·crtiscm..:nl, promoLion or sale llf nny producl or process, or in conn~cfion with \he rc·p\lblication ol'this r..:pon
for any pU!lXl:W oLh~t lhllll ror Ill~ add.Jcs:wc will be gr11Ull!d only on \:(Intact Thi~ cmDpllll.Y ncccpL"i 110 N:Spon.!iibilil)' c>;~~pl for I be Jul! pcrlbnnaocc of inspection ;mW'or analy,is in good faith and accordiny, lo lb..: ntiC!i nf lhc !rode aud ol'scicncc.
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Inorganic Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
Project:
Lab SetiD:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
1st Quarter Chloroform 2015
1503226
3/13/2015
3/9-3/12/2015
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation for the
samples were performed within the method holding times. The samples were properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD:
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, with the
following exceptions:
Sample ID Analyte QC Explanation
1503226-021B Nitrate-Nitrite (as N) MS/MSD Sample matrix interference
1503226-032B Nitrate-Nitrite (as N) MSD Sample matrix interference
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 3/26/2015 Page 6 of 92
All onaly~~l'l npplicnhle to the CWA. SDWA, rmd RCR,.t\ a.rc p~rfonncd in ae~~~l'-tancc to NELAC ]Jrotocols. Pcnincnt Mlmpling inforrmnion i~ locntcd on the au.uchcd COC.:. Confidential Businc5s Tnfonntltion: Thi!i rcpnrt is provided fonh~ exclusive usc of the
llddf~M~Q, Prtvile~cs or :mbscqul!nt use of lhc:: uomc oi'this Cflffi~ll)' or :~n:o tntmbct oriLS ~nnrr, or reprodu~tian of this Npon in connc~.:tion wllh the ndvcnisemenl, prnmmiou 01 ~le ur-nny rroduct nr procc,;.:~, or in conn.:ct-ion with lhc lC:·pu!Jiic:llil)D oi'this report
for any purp()liC otb.cr lhnll ror the addressee will b-J grnut~d tJnl}' on ~onuu.:\. Thi!t. compuny ~c:c:~:pL-; ll(l rc~romibilit'j C:<i.CCpt ror the due pcl't'onnanc:c or in~pcction andlor nnllly.!i!i in good raith and nccording to Lh..:: mlcli or the trade :llld or scicnc~ ..
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Volatile Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
Method:
Analysis:
1st Quarter Chloroform 2015
1503226
3/13/2015
3/9-3/12/2015
Intact
None
SW-846 8260C/5030C
Volatile Organic Compounds
General Set Comments: Multiple target analytes were observed above reporting limits.
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: All samples were received in appropriate
containers and properly preserved. The analysis and preparation of all samples were
performed within the method holding times following the methods stated on the analytical
reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, and Surrogates:
Method Blanks (MBs): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Surrogates: All surrogate recoveries were within established limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 3/26/2015 Page 7 of 92
All analyse:; llpplknblclo 1hc CWA) SDWA,Il.nd RCRA. urc pcrtm1ncd in ~c,mdtul~c lP NELAC prot(lCtl]s. Pcnin<.:nl :uullpling infonn:uion is \ocnLI!d un the au.acht,.'d COC. Confidcnlil'll Busincs~ lnfontHHion: This rcpon i:s provid~!d for Lhc cxcl~•~h·~: usc oflhc
addrc~c~. pfi...,ik6ts ofsubsaquc:nt u~e oflhc nil me oftbis compan} M nny m~mbct a filii :-.!AlT. or rcfll't)duction ofllli$ ~pori in conncctio11 wtth tllc ndv~ni!Wmt.mt. promoTion 01 ~lc or:my product or process, or in conn..:..:tion wiH1 the rc-publicatinn of this r.,;port
Hw any rurposc other thM fm lh(' athlrt~:~cc will h~ ~Ti'lolc~l onJy on con wet.. Thi~ compnny n~ccp1.~ no ~~pon!\ibiliLy cxc-Jp~ fl>r tbc dul! pcrlbnmmcc of inspc~Lion fludim tmalysis in good fai!.l1 ond Dccording to dli! ntlcs of lhc \lade end of science.
American West
ANAlYTICA.l LABORATORI ES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1503226
Project: 1st Quarter Chlorofonn 2015
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R76622 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.83
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R76625 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.84
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R76677 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.79
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R76791 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nittite (as N) 1.03
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked
03/16/2015 1234h
mg/L E300.0 0.00751 0.100 5.000
03/16/2015 2204h
mg/L E300.0 0.00751 0.100 5.000
03/17/2015 1625h
mg/L E300.0 0.00751 0.100 5.000
03/20/2015 1638h
m!!IL E353.2 0.00833 0.0100 1.000
Garrin Palmer
we
LCS
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
0 96.7
0 96.8
0 95.8
0 103
Limits
90-110
90-110
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 3/26/20 15 Page 8 I of 92
AU analyses 3pplicable to the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are perrormed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. Confidenrial Business lnfonnJ.tion: This 1eport is p1ovid~d fo1 the exclusive use of the ::1ddressec:. Privileges of subsl!quent use of the
name ofihis company or any member of its stan: or reproduction of this repon in connection wilh the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re--publication of this report ror :my purpose other than for the :.~dJressee will be gnmtec.J only on contact. This
~;ompany accep1s no responsibility except for lhe due perronnancc of inspcc1ion and/or analysis in gootl railh and according lo the rul~ of the Ira de and of sci~nce.
ANALYTICA L l ABORATOFI IES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1503226
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2015
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: MB-R76622 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride < 0.100
Lab Sample ID: MB-R76625 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride <0.100
Lab Sample ID: MB-R76677 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride < 0.100
Lab Sample ID: MB-R7679l Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) < 0.0100
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: (801 ) 263-8687
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
QC Type: MBLK
Reporting Amount Spike Ref.
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount o/oREC
03/16/2015 1217h
mg/L E300.0 0.00751 0.100
03/16/2015 2147h
mg/L E300.0 0.00751 0.100
03/17/2015 1608h
mg/L E300.0 0.00751 0.100
03/20/2015 163 6h
mg/L E353.2 0.00833 0.0100
Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt o/oRPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 3/26/2015 Page 82 of 92
All analyses 3pplicable to the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are ~rformed in accordance to NELAC prorocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is locared on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This 1'eport is provided for the exclusivt! use of the <Jddressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the
name of this company or any member ofits stafl: or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any ptoduct or process, or in connection with the: rc-publicl1fion of this r~pmt fot any purpose othl!r than fur the adUressc:e will be gnmtcd only on contact. This
company accepts no responsibility except lbr the due perlbnnancc of inspection and/or zmalysis in good faith and according to the rules of the tmde ami of science,
American West
ANAlYTICAl LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1503226
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2015
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: 1503226-00JAMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chlmide 99.6
Lab Sample ID: 1503226-0 l8AMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 5,680
Lab Sample ID: 1503226-021AMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 92.5
Lab Sample ID: 1503226-014AMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chlmide 804
Lab Sample ID: 1503226-00IBMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2 --
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.03
Lab Sample ID: 1503226-011BMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 2.21
Lab Sample ID: 1503226-021BMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 3.23
Lab Sample ID: 1503226-032BMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W -353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 9.50
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 8411 9
Phone: (80 I) 263-8686, Toll Free: [phone], Fax: (80 I) 263-8687
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Reporting
Units Method MDL Limit
03116/20151721h
mg/L E300,0 0.0751 1.00 -03/16/2015 2238h
mg/L E300.0 7.51 100
03/17/2015 237h
mg/L E300.0 0.0751 1.00
03/17/2015 1947h
mg/L E300.0 0.751 10.0 -03/20/20 15 1641 h
mg/L E353.2 0.00833 0.0100
03/20/2015 1817h
mg/L E353.2 0.0167 0.0200
03/20/2015 1827h
mg/L E353.2 0.0417 0.0500
03/20/2015 1833h
mg/L E353.2 0.0833 0.100
Dept: we
QCType: MS
Amount Spike Ref.
Spiked Amount
50.00 50.6
5,000 944
50.00 44.2
500.0 310
1.000 0
1.000 1.21
1.000 1.91
1.000 8.56
%REC
98.0
94.7
96.5
98.8
103
100
132
94.0
'-Matrix spike recove1y indicates matrix intelference. The method is in control as i11dicated by the LCS.
Limits
90-110
90-110
90-110
90-110
90-110
90-110
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 3/26/20 15 Page 83 of 92
All analyses ~pplicable to the CWA. SDWA .. ~nd RCRA nre performed in accorc.hmcl! to NELAC protocols. Pc1tinent sampling infom1<1tion is located on tbe attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This tepml is pnwided for lhe cxdusiv~ use of the <tdtlressee. Privileges ofsubst:quent usc of the
name of this company or any member ofics staO'. or reproduction of this 1cport in connection wilh tl'k: ttdv~rtisemcnt, promotion or sale of any pnxJuct or process, 01 in connection with the re-publicntion of this 1Cpt.lrt fiu any purpose other than tOr the alldressc::~ will be granted only on contact This
company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfonmmce of inslXclion and/or ::mnlysis in gootl faith und acco1 ding 10 the rules of the I• ade and of science.
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone] Laboratory Director
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
C SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Lab Set ID: 1503226 Dept: we
Project: l st Quarter Chloroform 2015 QC Type: MSD
Reporting Amount Spike Ref. RPDRef. RPD
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC Limits Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Lab Sample 10: 1503226-00JAMSD Date Analyzed: 03/16/2015 175lh
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 100 mg/L E300.0 O.o?51 1.00 50.00 50.6 99.7 90-110 99.6 0.857 20 -Lab Sample 10: 1503226-0ISAMSD Date Analyzed: 03/16/2015 2255h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 5,760 mg/L E300.0 7.51 100 5,000 944 96.3 90-110 5680 1.43 20
Lab Sample 10: 1503226-021AMSD Date Analyzed: 03117/2015 254h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 91.9 mg/L E300.0 0.0751 1.00 50.00 44.2 95.2 90-110 92.5 0.659 20
Lab Sample 10: 1503226-014AMSD Date Analyzed: 03/17/2015 2004h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 812 mg/L E300.0 0.751 10.0 500.0 310 100 90-110 804 0.978 20
Lab Sample 10: 1503226-00IBMSD Date Analyzed: 03/20/2015 1642h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2 .
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.03 mg/L E353.2 0.00833 0.0100 1.000 0 103 90-110 1.03 0.777 10
Lab Sample ID: 1503226-011BMSD Date Analyzed: 03/20/2015 1819h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 2.26 mg/L E353.2 0.0167 0.0200 1.000 1.21 105 90-110 2.21 2.19 10
Lab Sample 10: 1503226-021BMSD Date Analyzed: 03/20/2015 1829h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 3.23 mg/L E353.2 0.0417 0.0500 1.000 1.91 132 90-110 3.23 0.0929 10
Lab Sample 10: 1503226-032BMSD Date Analyzed: 03/20/20 15 1834h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Niuite (as N) 9.70 mg/L E353.2 0.0833 0.100 1.000 8.56 114 90-110 9.5 2.12 10
1 -Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix inte1:[erence. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
Report Date: 3/26/2015 Page 84 of 92
AJinna.lyses applicable ro the CWA. SDWA. nnd RCRA are ~formed in accord:J.ncc to NELAC pro1ocok Pe1tinent sampling inl'orrnation is located on the attacht!d COC, Confidential Business lnf01mation: This tepmt is provided fot the exclusive use oft.he n.ddressee. Privileges. of!'ubsequent U1'e of the
name of this company or any membc::r of its stan: or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion 01 sale of any produr.:t or process, or in connr.:ction wirh the re-publica! ion of this report for any purpose otht!t than forth~ uddressee will be grnntcd only on conmct. This
company ::tcct:-pls no responsibility except for the due pertbm1ance of inspection ~ndlor mmlysis in good fn.ith and accon.ling to the rules of the trade ~nd of science,
American West Analytical Laboratories UL
Denison
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1503226
Due Date: 3/24/2015
Page 1 of6
Client:
Client ID:
Project:
Comments:
Sample ID
IS03226-00 I A
IS03226-00 L B
IS03226-00IC
1503226-002A
1503226-0028
IS03226-002C
1S03226-003A
1503226-003 8
1503226-003C
1503226-004A
1S03226-0048
IS03226-004C
IS03226-00SA
1503226-0058
1S03226-005C
Printed: 3/13/2015
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
DENlOO
1st Quarter Chloroform 2015
Contact: Garrin Palmer
QC Level: III WO Type: Project
PA Rush. QC 3 (Summary/No chromatograms). RL of 1 ppm for Chloride and VOC and 0.1 ppm for N02/N03. Expected levels provided by client-see
Jenn. J-flag what we can't meet. ElM Locus and EDD-Denison. Email Group.;
Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
TW4-03R_03102015 3/I0/20IS 07SSh 3113/2015 IOISh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL ---~ . -. ·-N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SELAnalytes: N03N02N -..
8260-W-DENlOO ---~ VOCF'ridge
Test Group: 8260-W-DEN/00; #of Analytes: 4 I # ofSurr: 4
TW4-03_03112015 3111/2015 0746h 3113/20 L 5 LO ISh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-we
----I SEL Analytes: CL ----..
N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
--·--·· ---. I SEL Analytes: N03N02N ....... ~-
8260-W-DENIOO ~ VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-DEN/00; #of Analytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
TW4-12_03112015 3/11/20 1S 07S7h 3/13/201S I 0 ISh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SEL Analytes: CL
6 -· __.._ ........
N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N . -
8260-W-DENIOO ~ VOCF'ridge
Test Ct'Ottp! 8260-W-DENIOO; #of Analytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
TW4-28_03112015 3/11/2015 0804h 3/13/201S LOI5h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SEL Analytes: CL ·-N02/N03-W-353.2 0 df-no2/no3
-----. 1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N ... -·-~-8260-W-DENIOO VOCFridgc
Test Group: 8260-W-DENJOO; #of Analytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
TW4-32_03112015 3/11/2015 0810h 3/13/2015 10 ISh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SELAnalytes: CL ---·-· N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
-1 SELAnalytes: N03N02N ••
8260-W-DENlOO ~ VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-DEN!OO; #of Analytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
3
J
3
3
.1
FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M I I RT I I CN I I TAT 1· I QC I I HOK __ _ HOK __ _ HOK__ coc Emal!ect :; /f 2 II 5 ~
WORK ORDER Summary WorkOrder: 1503226 Page 2 of6
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 3/24/2015
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1503226-006A TVV4-t3_03112015 3/11/2015 0817h 3113/2015 l015h 300.0-VV Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SEL Ana lyles: CL
1503226-0068 N021N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1503226-006C 8260-VV-DENIOO ~ YOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-DEN!OO; #of Analytes: 4/# ofSurr: 4
1503226-007 A TW4-36_03112015 3/11/2015 0823h 3/13/2015 I 0 ISh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-we
-· .... ··-I SEL Analytes: CL ---1503226-0078 N021N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
. -... ·-· .. ·-·--. I SEL Ana/ytes: N03N02N
1503226-007C 8260-W-DENIOO ~ VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-DENIOO; #of Analytes: 41# o.fSurr: 4
1503226-00SA TVV4-27_03112015 3/11/2015 0830h 3113/2015 !015h 300.0-W Aqueous 0 df-wc
I SEL Analytes: CL
·----~ -·· .. . ------· . 1503226-0088 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
... -·····--··--·· I SEL Analytes: N03N02N . -1503226-008C 8260-W-DEN 100 ~ VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-DEN/00; #of Ana/ytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
1503226-009A TVV4-30 _ 03 I 12015 3/11/2015 0835h 3/13/2015 1015h 300.0-VV Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SEL Analytes: CL --.
1503226-0098 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N ---... -·. 1503226-009C 8260-W-DEN100 ~ VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-DEN/00; #of Analytes: 41# ofSurr: 4
1503226-{) 1 OA TW4-31_03112015 3/11/2015 0841 h 3/13/2015 lO ISh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SEL Ana/ytes: CL ..
1503226-0108 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N -•.
1503226-0 I OC 8260-W-DEN!OO ~ VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-DENIOO; #of Analytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
1503226-011A TVV4-34_031 12015 3/11/2015 0847h 3/13/2015 l015h 300.0-VV Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SEL Analytes: CL
1503226-0IIB N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
... ··------I SEL Analytes: N03N02N .. -1503226-0 II c 8260-VV-DENlOO ~ VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-DENIOO: #of Analytes: 4 I # ofSurr: 4
1503226-012A TVV4-35_03112015 3/11/2015 0853h 3/13/2015 !015h 300.0-VV Aqueous VI df-we
I SEL Ana lyles: CL
Plinted: 3/13/2015 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]; %M I J RT I I CN I I TAT I I QC I I HOK ___ HOK ___ HOK ___ COC Emailed
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1503226 Page 3 of6
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 3/24/2015
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Set Storage
1503226-0128 TW4-35_03112015 3/11/2015 0853h 3/13/2015 10 ISh N02/N03-W-353.2 Aqueous VI df-no2/no3
I SELAnalytes: N03N02N
1503226-012C 8260-W-DENIOO ~ YOC'Fridge 3
Test Group: 82611-W-DEN/00; #of Analytes: 4/# ofSurr: 4
1503226-013A TW4-23_03122015 3/12/2015 0703h 3/13/2015 10 ISh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-we
.. I SEL Ana/ytes: CL
1503226-013 B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N -.
1503226-0BC 8260-W-DENIOO ~ VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-DEN/00; #of Analytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
1503226-014A TW4-25_03092015 3/9/2015 1300h 3/13/2015 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-we
l SEL Analytes: CL ----........
1503226-0148 N02/N03-W-353.2 . ~ df-no2/no3
4. ___ __......._ ____ --. -... -I SEL AnaZvtes: N03N02N
1503226-014C 8260-W-DENIOO ~ VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-DEN/00; #of Analytes: 4 1# ofSurr: 4
1503226-0 !SA TW4-14_03122015 . 3/12/2015 0712h 3/13/2015 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SELAnalytes: CL . . .
1503226-0 15B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
. I SELAnalytes: N03N02N
1503226-0 I SC 8260-W-DENJOO ~ VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-DEN/00; #of Alla/ytu; 4/# ofSurr: 4
1503226-0 16A TW4-26_03122015 3/12/20 15 0720h 3/13/2015 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous VI df -we
I SEL Analytes: CL -· . -· 1503226-0168 N02/N03-W-353.2 J\/1 df-no21no3
I SELAna/ytes: N03N02N -
1503226-0 16C 8260-W-DENIOO ~ VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-DEN/110; #of Ana lyles: 4 1# ofSurr: 4
1503226-0I?A TW4-05_03122015 3/12/2015 0728h 3/13/2015 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SEL Analytes: CL ---· --1503226-0 17B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
-~ .. .. ' . -. I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1503226-0 17C 8260-W-DENIOO ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-DENIOIJ; #of Ana/ytes: 4/# ofSurr: 4
1503226-0 18A TW4-24_03092015 3/9/2015 1326h 3/13/2015 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous VI df-we
I SEL Ana(ytes: CL
1503226-0188 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SELAnalytes: N03N02N
Printed: 3/13/2015 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M I I RT I CN I I TAT I I ac 1 1 HOK ___ HOK ___ HOK ___ COC Emailed
WORK ORDER Summary
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Sample lD Client Sample lD Collected Date
1503226-0 18C TW4-24_03092015 3/9/2015 1326h
1503226-019A TW4-18_03122015 3/12/2015 0738h
I 503226-0198
I 503226-0 19C
1503226-020A TW4-09_03l22015 3/1212015 0747h
1503226-0208
1503226-020C
1503226-021A TW4-33_03122015 3/12/20 I 5 0755h
1503226-021 8
1503226-021 c
I 503226-022A TW4-08_03122015 3/12/2015 0803h
1503226-0228
1503226-022C
1503226-023A TW4-21_03122015 3/12/2015 081 lh
1503226-0238
1503226-023C
I 503226-024A TW4-29 _ 03122015 3/12/2015 0821 h
1503226-0248
1503226-024C
Work Order: 1503226
Due Date: 3/24/2015
Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
3/13/2015 IOJSh 8260-W-DENIOO Aqueous ~ VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-DEN/00; #of Analyles: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
3/13/2015 10 I 5h 300.0-W
I SEL Analytes: CL
N02/N03-W-353.2
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
8260-W-DENIOO
Aqueous
Test Group: 8260-W-DENIOO; #of Anazvtes: 4 /# o{Surr: 4
3/ 13/20 15 10 ISh 300.0-W
I SEL Ana/ytes: CL
N02/N03-W-353.2
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
8260-W-DENIOO
Aqueous
Test Group: 8260-W-DENI/JO; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
31!3/20 15 10 I 5h 300.0-W
I SEL Analytes: CL
N02/N03-W-353.2
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
8260-W-DENIOO
Aqueous
Test Group: 8260-W-DEN/00; #of Ana/ytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
3/13/2015 1015h 300.0-W
I SEL Analytes: CL
N02/N03-W-353.2
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
8260-W-DENIOO
AqLteous
Test Group: 8260-W-DEN I 00; #of Ana/ytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
3/13/2015 J015h 300.0-W
I SEL Analytes: CL
N02/N03-W-353.2
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
8260-W-DENIOO
Aqueous
Test Group: 8260-W-DEN/00; #of Analytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
3/13/2015 1015h 300.0-W
1 SEL Ana lyles: CL
N02/N03-W-353.2
I SELAnalytes: N03N02N
8260-W-DENIOO
Aqueous
Test Group: 8260-W-DENIOO; #of Ana~vtes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
df-wc
62J df-no2/no3
VOCFridge
~ df-wc
~ df-no2/no3
~ VOCFridge
df-we
df-no2/no3
~ VOCFridge
~ df-wc
df-no2/no3
~ VOCFridge
[ill df ·we
~ df-no2/no3
~ VOCFridgc
~ df-wc
~ df-no2/no3
~ VOC£'1idge
Page 4 of6
)
l
3
l
3
Printed: 3/13/2015 FORLABORATORYUSEONLY[filloutonpage1]: %M 1 I RT 1 I CN I I TAT 1.1 QC I I HOK __ _ HOK __ _ HOK___ COC Emailed,__ ___ _
WORK ORDER Summary WorkOrder: 1503226 Page 5 of6
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 3/24/2015
Sample 10 Client Sample 10 Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1503226-025A TW4-16_03122015 3/12/20 IS 0830h 3/13/2015 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous f./ I df-we
I SEL Analytes: CL
1503226-0258 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no21no3
I SELAnalytes: N03N02N --. ·-1503226-025C 8260-W-DEN100 ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-DENIOO; #cf Ana/ytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
1503226-026A TW4-11_03092015 319120 15 1408h 3113/2015 IO!Sh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-we
I SEL Analytes: CL
1503226-0268 N021N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1503226-026C 8260-W-DEN 100 ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-DENIOO; #of Analytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
1503226-027 A TW4-04_03092015 319/2015 1453h 3/13/2015 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-we
I SEL Analytes: CL -IS03226-0278 N021N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
. -.. ·--. 1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N . '
IS03226-027C 8260-W-DEN 100 ~ VOCFridge 'l
Test Group: 8260-W-DENJOO; #of Analytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
1503226-028A TW4-01_03092015 3/9/201S 1443h 3/13/2015 I 0 ISh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SEL Ana lyles: CL
1503226-0288 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1503226-028C 8260-W-DEN 100 !!Zl VOCFridge 1
Test Group: 8260-W-DEN/00; #of Ana/ytes: 4 I # ofSurr: 4
1503226-029A ~W-04_03092015 3/9/201S 1437h 3113/201S 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SEL Analytes: CL -.
IS03226-0298 N021N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SELAnalytes: N03N02N
1503226-029C 8260-W-DEN 100 ~ VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-DENIOO; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSwr: 4
IS03226-030A ~W-26_03092015 3/9/20 15 1400h 3/13/201S 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-we
I SEL Ana/ytes: CL
IS03226-030B N021N03-W-353.2 ~ ctr-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1503226-030C 8260-W-DENIOO ~ VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-DEN/00; #of Ana/ytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
IS03226-031 A TW4-02_03092015 319/2015 1427h 3/13120 IS 10 ISh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df -wc
1 SEL Ana/ytes: CL
Printed: 3/13/2015 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M I I RT I I CN I I TAT I I QC I I HOK ___ HOK ___ HOK ___ COC Emailed
WORK ORDER Summary WorkOrder: 1503226 Page 6 of 6
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 3/24/2015
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1503226-0318 TW4-02_03092015 3/9/2015 1427h 3/13/2015 1015h N02/N03-W-353.2 Aqueous VI df-no2/no3
1 SEL Ana/ytes: N03N02N
1503226-031 c 8260-W-DENIOO ~ VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-DEN/00; #cJ AnOI)Ites: 4 I # ofSurr: 4
1503226-032A TW4-l9_03092015 3/9/2015 J200h 3/13/2015 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous fil df-we
1 SEL Ana(vtes: CL
1503226-032 8 N02/N03-W-353.2 Vl df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N -1503226-032C 8260-W-DENIOO ill] vocr,idge J
Test Group: 8260-W-DENIOO; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1503226-033A TW4-22_03092015 3/9/2015 1336h 3/13/2015 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SEL Analytes: CL
00
1503226-0338 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2Jno3
1 SEL Ana/ytes: N03N02N
1503226-033C 8260-W-DENIOO ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-DEN/00; #of Ana(vtes: 4 I # ofSurr: 4
1503226-034A TW4-20_03092015 3/9/2015 1350h 3/13/2015 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SEL Analytes: CL
1503226-0348 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL Ana/ytes: N03N02N -1503226-034C 8260-W-DENIOO ~ VOC:Fridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-DEN/00; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1503226-035A TW4-65_03112015 3/11/2015 0810h 3/13/2015 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SELAnalytes: CL -· 1503226-0358 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL Ana/ytes: N03N02N
1503226-035C 8260-W-DENIOO ~ VOCFridgc 3
Test Group: 8260-W-DENIOO; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1503226-036A T\V4-70_03122015 3/12/2015 0728h 3/13/2015 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df -we
I SEL Analytes: CL
1503226-0368 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
. 1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1503226-036C 8260-W-DENIOO ~ VOCFJidge 3
Test Group: 82MI-W-DENJOO; #of Ana/ytes: 4 I # ofSwr: 4
1503226-037A Trip Blank 3/9/2015 3/13/2015 I 0 ISh 8260-W-DENIOO Aqueous ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-DEN/00; #of Analytes: 4 I # ofSurr: 4
Printed: 3113/2015 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M I I RT I I CN I. I TAT I I QC I I HOK __ _ HOK __ _ HOK___ COC Emailed,__ ___ _
American West
Analytical Laboratories
463 W. 3600 S. Salt Lake City. UT 84115
Phone# [phone] Toll Free # (888) 263-t\686
Fax# (801) 26~687 Email [e-mail]
www.awal-labs.com
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Address: 6425 S. Hwy. 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Contact: Garrin Palmer
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
All analysis vvlll be cahducted using NELAP accredited methods and all data wtll be reported using AWAL's standard analyte lists and reporting
limits (~QL) unless specifically requested otherVv'ise an this Chain of Custody arKlfor attached documentation. L -QC ~evel: I Turn Around Time:
Standard
Unless other arrangements have been mede,
signed reports wilt be emailsd by 5:00pm on
the day thsy are dus,
l( Include EDD:
. LOCUS UPLOAD
ISQJz_z_{p
AWAL Lab Sample Set#
Page 1 of 3
Oue Uiilit: -c-
' ,_ ...• { .lv;J '\. .-. ._-..
~.1-~~ffi';~Yt;:~~~:~~:~
EXCEL
Field Filtered For.
I·~ ~ -=~··-;.::r:~r _ ..... ~Pilla;\I.;....~ •• F...t:ri'¥~ . ;' , ~------------~~:·:-~:::r7::t7~~~
For Compliance With: ·•· -':·. C.: i ~:11 ,a _ [phone] Cell#:
a:piJiil'"*wu-8YfiiQta_co.,.; K'\vci.,CII@oaeru:Yfii•L:.o<>m: I
Phone#: 0 NELAP ' 3f ·>r~, ~~~-~~~'~Q~ ·~ ~ ~~~ '~--~ ~i:·· h "[:._~· t~ Email: ·~~pfl!ak.com
Project Name: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2015
Project#:
PO#: ~ Q)
Sampler Name: Tanner Holliday c ·n;
"E 0
Sample 10~
Time lu
Sampled I!
IITW4-03R_03102015 755 lp
2 ITW4-03_03112015 746 Is
757 15
804 5
810 6
~ Q'
c:i oj a ll) "' " ~ ... 0 :s .., 0 "' 0 :::;; 0
D' 0 10 C'l ~
iO SDWA '' ~~~;~~~-.o:., '· o.<-_ "_:.. ;. liJ ELAP/A2LA • 'y · ~.'}'"!~, ;:-. 'tr · ,....; .. ·•.~-.
0 NLLAP ~· ...... .._ .-.. ~;.-·'•' 1
". ~~~~ '::··t~·"·~; a Non-Compliance ---:;,._ •• fr,Mvo4.~· ..• -\ ~~
D Other: !&.. ~~1.:.. '• '.t _ ~ _~"" .. rt·'--... • ~~ ~ · ... \.···~~~·(7-,..s\•·".-.,:r.;._ 1------------11" '· u--~~ .... :_;;: ~. { ... ~.:·.ti-.J·~· -• .,.. ~ .,... ,r. ., l .:, ...
• -~· ' 'Vi"',_ ·, •' • ."";.I Known Hazards ~. · ~ -~'".!;'!. . -•. 1 :1 ••
·I ci I <C. I Q I I I I I I I I I I & .. :"(· ~.•J:r.<:~ : :;,~ ~I
~1~1°1;;:1 I I I I I I I I I SampleComments II.;·~~· ... ·~-::?:~.-
<D Iii!; ll) .. .... ~ ~ ('I ~
"'
,., -
"' w -. •' . ·,,-,. _ ....... , , -I x I x I X I I I I I I I I I I II' '. ~·-."«· ,:_o; ,J:i.:JI,k':!_~~ ~_.-..,. X I X llllllllllll I ~~:,· -" ;-" ; -· ~--7 w xlxlx
w X
w X
w -::::::· : : : : -~~~~:r~
I I I II rx~l X I I I \ I I I I I I ll":i,~~~~ -'}:·~-.. .· X~ X I I I i 1 I I I I I lk.~:;·~~·:·. :~-·~.: .':~. ·· .. ... r!IPP . ""'~-· ~r-"-..
817 s w I X I X I X -
823 s w X I X I X
830 6 w I x I x I x I I I I I I I I I I II ;"J ;,,_, ~ .~ <:~""'~ >.'::--_, X I X I X
·, ~.I .,~f · .....
X X X ,.. • .. ~ ~f~.----.... ~. :=._,., 1 j~ OliCt~e·~~>~r': · • ~~~--c&~~· .. , ·'
X X X "if':~~:.~~.·~· 1 1''f!. ";~~:·,~;.~~
x x x ... ·~~-=-~:·.:'.. .. r .::-~-... A~--~ .. ~-~:~~··· ~< ,,.,:r~ -''1•· ~ t",-c. 1, t,.f '\0',• X X X -' ·.•r ~~'JJ'ja . ~· ""-·. · , ... _-'%·.1 , -I I r I' t...1 ·-·;,....__~":>~·=i...~-.: ~·.r !~"''·' .:.~-. ~ ...
li31TW4-23_03122015 I 3/12/2015 I 1• 1• . ·.. ·-- -·-
835 :;. w X
841 5 w
847 5 w
853 5 w
703 s w x l xlx
:~~~~~:;;;;·--~&~-=-RU'--,oo.,. ~I rt.l•K c-... t ...... n ............ IR&C&ivad by: PitS: lsi nature Special instructions:
1'<\nl r<omo. &o...c-1-IA V.l.o.(VVIif nm~ l~o 'rlniO'
IP''"' '"'"'"' wa~odl¥ lnnt~ Fecelv~4L ~ I 7 7 r -. . . . -.... . . -
1gnature ,Sigc,atuf ~. • · -----;
Time: 4 _
---__/ !>me 3/171/
IP!t·m N&no: ~~ ~~ rime:
Print Name:
f<s>nqUISheo Dy: ~gnature
Print Name:
RefmqUished by:
:srgnature
Print Name:
Data;
rnm•:
Jbata:
lme:
;Rs~ved by:
Signature
IPnnt Name:
R.acelved by:
Signature
Jf.r:intName:
/CI/'5'
f / [Oats:
-lmo:
Date:
1me:
American West
Analytical Laboratories
463 W. 3600 S. Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone#[phone] Toll Free# (888} 263-8686
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
All e.nalysis will be conducted using NELAP acc;redlled methods and all daLe will be reported using AWAL's standard analyte lisl5 and reporting
limits (POL) unless specifically requested otherwise on this Chain of CUstody and/or attached documenlallon
AWAL Lab Sample Set#
Page 2 of 3
Fax# [phone] Email awal@awal-labs com
www.awal-labs.com
I QC ~evel: I Turn Around Time:
Standard
~.~-. arrangements have been made,
signed reports will be emallad by 5:00 pm on
thedaylhay aredue1
Di.feU>mu1 r.
-... ~ f ~~~j
Client Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Address: 6425 S. Hwy. 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Contact Garrin Palmer
Phone#: [phone] Cell#:
gp&[e-mail]; KWeinal@energyfu::e:t:f.=-.c=o::rn=;,--------
Email: dba.d:&'Gtmrqfltalii~C'Utn.
Project Name: ht Quarter Chloroform 2015 I
Project#: I
PO#:
sampler Name: ~Tran;;;;n~e;rlH~o;llmidd'a:y;;--------------------1
i( Include EDD:
LOCUS UPLOAD
EXCEL
Field Filtered For:
~l~~~s~;fp~;-~
'r;. :.: . ·;uU.~-::"IP;, ' ; ;,v; • ', '~.·~-.,. ~.~~ ... ~-!\.:·~. \'~-~~~~_r·""~-·~~\~ ~-.,· 1-----------l o ~-~ ·-'"~""'I 1ForComplianceWKh: ~-: j" , ~-:-"! :·; ,-.1,~ \~1
0 NELAP "'-~~ \:<""1)-( .. "•''c "'·/;,~ :·
0 RCRA _ ~-· ... ~c_~ ... :ff ~ 1 .. _/ ~~ l ~ ,· ~·-, 1·
0 CWA ~·~e.~
0 SDWA ·.• ·.~~~;;;,j'~.-·: 1'! :'' '<
D ELAPIA2LA ··~,: ,-;:~·r )1;1~ ·.' :_·~:
D NLLAP -• • · £ ~--..:
0 Non-~ompliance ~~~~--~; 1-~j~~.~~J:~~:;). 0 Olher. -~ -:~o.l · ,r:r.--, . 1
1-----------ll;f:t .... =~~~~:~ ·: ~;~~:;
& ··.• ... ~-.~-i:'~·
I'(' TW4-25_UaU!I:.!Ul5
,, TW4-14_03122015
/(/;;i TW4-26_03122015
11• TW4-05_03122015
tffs TW4-24_03092015
l"f' TW4-18_03122015
"1,.0 TW4-09_031220 15
,_(a TW4-33_03l22015
,_;J1. TW4-08_03l22015
~ 'I'W4-21_03122015
L.tl. TW4-29_031.2201S
1. 'l r-rw4-16_03122015
:!.. ~ TW+Jl_03092015
Known Hazards (~~~-, ; .,·~-~" ~i~_-1-:-;-''
.,, y· • r r IV •• '!rl.! .. " ::-l.l!.r-:.t-.::.+--i...:;;+-t--+-+-1--+-+-l--+-~-...:;:~~~:.:.:::~~--ll,;. ~~: -~'-~~:. ··~-,.):<
X X X I I I I I I 11;3"''~. -_.:.. :...: .. •• ·;< . CPQ(!~~~,..~.~.. ,·' ....... (~)~
X X x I I I I I I ll'}~:.,;,.n~~--;.,-.:y _._ ,-, .,, .. -~ ,~! .. X X X I I I I I I IL1i), ..... _..,.• . (, ,_;,. ~ :-f.; !!;
• ~~~~~··:· :::.•'!,
X X X I I I I II' ·~ ;. ·~1 ; '·l'+. -' .~~~ .• r._:"..; .... ~~-:-~.t·~:· _''
X X X I I I I 1 I II ·-~· ~P.I'_~'mpli! .® .. >-. """,~;.... '-.;'r ~tl'-, ~~~ "'·
·:.. i.,_ .. .,. ........ ~-4-~~ ,_ ..-._:<:
X X X I I I I I I 11 .~,"'·:·.:6-(i#.~-·-..;;,.c..·~·, ,:, ~~-~t~,.._.~III1~A'--f ~-1;...., :
X X X I I I I I I I ~'-.Y. ·:: ~·11·! --.. ;. ·~·<'' <'_ ~-__:, ----...• ,;-~)::., .... ---,.,~
X X X I I I I I I Ill":!'£:_.,.·~·-¥~~--· p!~~-to·:,-.:;;, -·
x x x I I I I I I 11~.{,..•~' :."~rn· _ -;,~~ •'..;1
1 :t· .r-.,~·-_, ~ rt'-=..: -...
X X X I I I I I I II . .-. .. . .. -·-tf ·~,·~: -·--';. ... .:t. ~ ':.. .. -:..... . ~~f".l
X X X I I I I I I II •). ·:-:···.ji:j. _. -~ _ _:".2·
x x x I I I I I I 1(7; t .~· .. ,.~~·-·· ~"",:~
ReJinq,i•hod by. (. • --· L .,.;;,/ ... • lt:lol~:dt l /
iSIQ!'ature "!.t.tA.,.tl.-... b':rVV"--.. "l. ~> [tiiiii< :Speciol Instructions:
F'. < :'> I ll'lmo: J """'""""' u·r:..ri~~.--r t... \ ~ I l '2.CJttj Print Namo: ~ _ .1 ., , _ I See the Analytical Scope of Work for Reporting Limits and VOC
Si<;;~neture
~rlnl Name: /06
.R&!inqol:~;fiSCfoy:
Signature 7 Jbaw
]mo! I, me:
Pr.i.ol~
Rolinqurshed by:
Signature
l.at,c" pate:
Time:
~i!r•-.o
~
.,.
)
}
American West
Analytical Laboratories
463W.36005. Solll.okeClty,UT 84115
Phone# [phone] Toll F""' H (888) 263416S6
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Allar'llllys.la Wilt be condUCt.d ullng NElAP •ccnldJIId m_.hod• •nd all d.l ... will bo reporttld ualnu AWAL"a •tandard er'llllytellsll and raporl!rtg
linirb {PQL\ urtou ~ly 1equU\td oUlDNMe on lhla Chail\ ol Cu:UodV llndlot &UacNd Mocum..ufion.
AWAL lab Somplo Sel #
P;ge l ol l
L~~ Fax# [phone] Email owal@awol-lab~""" I QCLevol: I TurnAroundTIITKl: "" .. '''""'"'.,..m""'""""tooo-gjl~,~-· J!. ::""'~,:~'1-'f. :~~~
. ilt)nadrllt)OftswilbumdDdby5.00...,._. ~~ ~· .,....~ ~ _,
WYJW.awal-labs.com 3 Standard lhact.ythlyarad\.111 !~~~~
.fl<".~; .... ;,g Cllant Eaer&J' Fuel& Reaource•, I11c. X lr)dud8EDQ. ~-Y~,
A<lcbn: 6425 S, Bwy. 191 ~:UPLOAD ;~~~m· .-;:: ···;-~~
Blau.U..r;, UT 84611 Fleldfllliredfor. ~-·.::.c.~. ~,(,. . .:;iJ ·""i't~~-· · 'r{,';, ~ ; Jl
C0f$10!: Garrln Palmcn :: .. 2..~~'' /'.~lo:r..,
ForCompllon<:oWlth: • __ ..,...,-1>1~ ~~';, Phone#: (43SJ67S..2221 Ceffll: D NELAP I"W~ . =.· ~· .~-cl':'o;l_
Emall: -..n ... ~ 0 CWA !:•,~~""J::.,...., •. um;i;_ o-li7fu&l&:_ •om: Ki'olii~,."'l)''iiiOL="'l IJ RCF!A ).l\'~-l:il:. ~ .. --~ ··:j-
ProloctN•me: llltQuart:uCbloroform20lS 0' g ~aA2LA ~~-:7~.::·--:~~.:\J_:':.. •.. ~.~-~-~--·
Projoctlf. ~ 0 !? Nun-Compliance ~~-~-~ _ ·.~ •• ~ .. '1\\~ '_\, ;...~ ., g ~ o Olller: . , .. ~'rot~~ ,~
POll: S il !!l, B ~ ~,;1?~~7!11
Sompler Nlflle: Tanner HoUiday ~ " g o ~ ~ • ..J ~~ . ,_~11:1'--::; z Si ~ Known Hazards ~·+~ n.o:ij\~ .;-.4~ •'·
Dale Time 8 f Oi :t. ~ & ~ tr<ll.i"~ 'i"~'!i ;tO:~;·
0 E 0 ..... 0 ~ -·-··-".,.._;-rf. ~ ~~ '~.!... '-SilmpleiO; Sampled Samjllad ~ ~ :z: u ;> San""eCof111T1onts . ~:'Q:,._ ~~-~~~ ~J
.., TW'l.o4_0309:2015 3/9/2015 1453 s W X X X , .'~ 10.·· ,iJ._f
j ~1,.03092015 3/9/2015 1443 s W X X X 'ij~Wa,""'":'~~ ~--------------------------r-----;-----i-~~~r-+-+-;--r-r-+-;--J--~r-------------11~~~~~~~~·.,
"( IIW-44_0309'201.5 3/9/2015 1437 5 W X X X ~~~~:'··~, ;?"-:r~·>~t.'!lrf:. ·~I 1---------------------4----4----l--+-+--l--,f--+-+-if--+-+-+--f-+-+--+-----------lll~~rh . , ·. · ~ .. ~ d IIW-26_03092015 3/9/2015 1400 s W X X X ~. :.q! ~"'-~•""-~' ;'!';,~~
~ TW4-0Z.03092015 3/9{2015 1427 s W X X . X ~ , ::-:~/-~ ~~~
1. T\114-19_03092016 3/9/2015 1200 li W X X X ~~~~:·. .~J
) TW4-22 .. 03092015 3/9/2015 1336 5 W X X• X ~.~~ ~j
'( TW4-20.0;J092015 3/9/2015 1350 5 W X X X , \'!f ..:;c::.e~· ·~ ~]
'S TW4-65_03112016 3/11{2015 810 5 W X X X .,. . 1• ~ • ~;!< c. TW4-70.03J:i20J.S 3/12{2015 728 5 W X X X . ,-ty~ _,~~-(:~ ··: '•. ~
I· ~X .;gil~~,!)>'~~ 1 Trip Bbualt 3/9/2015 3 W X '. ·i:-_ , ~. ,§.,;"'·!~.: '·~ t-----------------------iJ-----+----tH-1--J-+--+-t-r-+--+-t-l-+--t--+-----------lli _..-.,. .. -;"' · ·"' 11 Temp Bialik ~ '"~ ;,., ;·, ' · ''
1-------------+---i------l-l--l----l--t--l--t--t--t--+--!--!--!--!--+-------llll . . · · :. "" I ' 11, • d ._.:..__. ' ~
~=~""""'G----.~ .,."J.(I 'Z..{tS ::::.~r. "•' Spl!dW inslrucUcns;
_ • ._,.. _&ti<-r,_~ ,....._ ·~c... I..............: fll""i' 1 zoo "'"'""""' .r """'' 1~ ... "1'\ Qolo< .__.., .9 '. _ -//. / .,.,.., 'l. , /' /.' .,.-See the_ Analytical Scope of Worlt for Reporting Llrnils ond VOC
ll'o""iUO• _,. "'"'CJ A.§'.Lc. ~-.-'?? -? ' -/ Malytc h•t.
... ..,,_ l"rro\ol "~"'',..... £ ~~ ,t,l_~... 7 / 11mc. 'Off
~~.... """' ·--~ , 7 .,.,. ~· lb\ICUI4 .~ Tlt~-jlim ..
l'rW. f4iwa-)o'ltlojl uoma
~a-A _Vole. =-.,. ""'~
fimc· nma:
~·-_, .....
Analysis
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
N02&N03
O&G
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TP04
Procedure:
Frequency:
Preservation Check Sheet
s lc Set Ext
Preservative I 2 J Lj r G ....
pH <2 H2S04
pH <2 H2S04
pH>l2
NaOH
pH<2 HN03
pH <2 H2S04 '(e-'> ~s yc5 Vc5 VcJ (..{~
pH <2 HCL If , II II II j/
pH <2 H2S04
pH> 9NaOH,
Zn Acetate
pH <2 H2S04
pH <2 H2S04
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from Lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
I
{c5
doH
1? 1
~s lif.5
/ I
16 II
Yer Ve5 I, /
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
If sample is not preserved, properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag COC, notify client if requested
Place client conversation on COC
Samples may be adjusted
All samples requiring preservation
*
+ ...
#
•
The sample required additional preservative upon receipt.
The sample was received unpreserved
The Sample was received unpreserved and therefore preserved upon receipt.
"The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH < 2 due to the sample matrix
The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH > __ due to the sample matrix interference
h ..
«k.s 17
Lab Set ID:
/j /~ 15
J .5 a .3 L -z-(Q
'" 7__,
/(J /) I~
Ycf \kS ~ v-~ I Vel J~·5
I' II I/ ]I v
-
I
Analysis
Ammonia
con·
Cyanide
Metals
N02&N03
O&G
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TP04
I
Procedure:
Frequency:
Preservation Check Sheet
s lc Set Ext, --
Preservative 11 20 2..{ .zz... .t~ ?...t(
pH<2 H2S04
pH<2 H2S04
pH>12
NaOH
pH<2HN03
pH <2 H2S04 _'{___e-') y'cs _&5 Jtc5 Yc5 t.fs
pH<2HCL If , 1/ I/ II II
pH<2H2S04
pH>9NaOH,
ZnAcetate
pH<2 H2S04
pH <2 H2S04
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from Lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
l.."r
(c5
-dnH
.z<D 2..'1
~~ l.ks
I I
2Y ]._i:f
~r v'e5 IT I/
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
If sample is not preserved, properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag COC, notify client if requested
Place client conversation on COC
Samples may be adjusted
All samples requiring preservation
*
+
•
#
•
The sample required additional preservative upon receipt.
The sample was received unpreserved
The Sample was received unpreserved and therefore preserved upon receipt.
The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH < 2 due to the sample matrix
The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH > __ due to the sample matrix interference
Lab SetiD: ;.:ra3z.:z .. --u
v(l-
3.1 Jl )z_ }J 'Sf )>) 3>G
J
~.s Ycf \~S lh v~ 1\/# L-f--1 I/ II I/ I/ I" I/ ~
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Garrin Palmer
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
TEL: [phone]
RE: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2015
Dear Garrin Palmer: Lab Set ID: 1503326
American West Analytical Laboratories received 7 sample(s) on 3119/2015 for the
analyses presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AW AL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) in Utah and Texas; and is
state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, and Missouri.
All analyses were performed in accordance to the NELAP protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation scope documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
Thank You,
Approved by:
Kyle
Gross
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 3/31/2015 Pagel of25
All an11.lys~ npplicnbk \othc CWA, SDWA, rutd RCRA 11rc pcrfo1med in uccordancc to NELAC prot()(:ol:\ Pertinent ~~unpling inf~,;~nmlion is l~o.H:d on the t\Uuclcl COC. Confidcntio.IOusincs:; lnf\lnmtion: This 1qkl(\ is rrovidtd fer \he a.clusi,:"C u:sc oftlu;
addressee. Privile~;,-cs ofsubse(juem usc or the name of 1bis company or any member ofit.s .unrr, or rcptoduclion of this rcpon in connection with the tu:tvcniscmanl, prolttotion or sale oftmy product or p~--esoo. arin coonoc:\ioo. 'Wilh the: tc'-poMieltion ofllris t'tp()rt
for ony PUillOSC other thl\11 for the addressee will be grontc:d only on c:ootpct. Thi~ company Rtc:cpts no rcspon$ibi1ity except for the due: pcrfonnaoce of inspection nudlur 1\Mlysis ln good fai1h iWd according to !he ruJ~ of the tr.ttk ond. ofscitore.
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2015
Lab Set ID: 1503326
Date Received: 3/19/2015 945h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
3440 South 700 West
1503326-00lA TW 4-06R 03172015 3/17/2 015 930h Aqueous Aruons, E300.0
Salt Lake City, UT 84119 1503326-00lB TW4-06R 03172015 3/17/2015 930h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1503326-001 c TW4-06R_03172015 3/17/2015 930h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Phone: [phone] 1503326-002A MW-32_03172015 3/17/2015 1400h Aqueous Aruons, E300.0
1503326-0028 MW-32_03172015 3/17/2015 1400h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353 .2 Toll Free: [phone] 1503326-002C MW-32_03172015 3/17/2015 1400h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Fax: [phone]C/5030C
e-mail: [e-mail] 1503326-003A TW4-06 03182015 3/18/2015 757h Aqueous Aruons, E300.0
1503326-0038 TW4-06_03182015 3/18/2015 757h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
web: www.awal-labs.com 1503326-003C TW4-06_03182015 3/18/2015 757h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1503326-004A TW4-07_03182015 3/18/2015 805h Aqueous Aruons, E300.0
Kyle F. Gross 1503326-0048 TW4-07 03182015 3/18/2015 805h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1503326-004C TW4-07_03182015 3/18/2015 805h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Laboratory Director 8260C/5030C
1503326-005A TW4-10 03182015 3/18/2015 812h Aqueous Aruons, E300.0
Jose Rocha 1503326-0058 TW4-10 03182015 3/18/2015 812h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
QA Officer 1503326-005C TW4-10 03182015 3/18/2015 812h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1503326-006A TW4-60_03172015 3/17/2015 855h Aqueous Aruons, E300.0
1503326-0068 TW4-60 03172015 3/17/2015 855h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1503326-006C TW4-60_03172015 3/17/2015 855h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1503326-007 A Trip Blank 3117/2015 Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Report Date: 3/31/2015 Page2 of25
All .,,I .... OJ'f!lEOohlc IO lhC CWA, SOW A..,., RCRI\ Ill< f""(OI11led in O<tonlancc"' ELM~ proW(od t<11<0<rn ;omplins '"'"""'""'" n·t.l<nood on <he at<ochod coc. (.'on!ikllwl ~ lnfm•o>l•n Thl; """'I f'tUvlcl<,tl\>rll><> <lltlu•l\cusc or <he
oddrnlllli::Ct rn~l<"..r-. .... Qf. ubscqucm usc of tht td1'n;' nl'UII' tm~'lY'"' any mcmbel' or tl.t.biT. Arn'Tfl\4U .. Unu ofllUt rcpon in ('Ott\acttinn Wlillthc odvcrtisct~t.:llt., prou'flb'\tlfl w. s:~ko<~t:-"~ ~~tut1 (II~'-.:"$$.."' m \"00~ \\10 ~ 1\ ... .(l®f~ll~ oflhis r-:::pm\
for .All}' rmrm . ~lll-;rtt LliD.q for the add~sscc '"'~II ~ ,OtiiiU d 1\l'll)'.t'ln [fllnlD.Cl. Tllis comp. rl}' IJQCI:JU't no h:-(\OQliblh~ ~Xpl for' l'b: l~fJJ.f''PCC ofinsp.zctmn (lll(l/OrQnC.\J3lt'fl ~, fllihh.a~ t«t·~·dmw ~ tt~ ualtt tlr~tottc M~
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Inorganic Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
1st Quarter Chloroform 2015
1503326
3/19/2015
3117-3/19/2015
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation for the
samples were performed within the method holding times. The samples were properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD:
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, with the
following exceptions:
te
Nitrate-Nitrite (as N)
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 3/31/2015 Page 3 of 25
All ann lyse::; applicable to the CWA, SDWA, nnd RCRA urc pcrrunncd in nccordAnct lo NELAC protocols, Pcrtincntsompling in[onnation is locntcd on lhc anucbcd COC. Conildcminl Business lnflm,lnlion: Thb T~m is provided for the exclusive use of the
addressee. Privileges of subsequent use ofLhc ne.m~ of this comprmy or ony member or its 1\ICilT. or repl'oduclion oflbis report in connccUon whh the adveniscment, promotion or 58k ofoRy producl or pf\'K."'CSS. twiu coo:ncclion wilh 1h.: n;.pub~knlion oflhis t'l!pott
for eny purpose olhcr lhar:1 (or lhc addn:sscc will be gro.ntcd only on coolo.cl-. This compo.ny Rcccpts no rcsponsibilily except for lhc due pcrfonnance ofinspcclion onJ!or o.n11lys.i~ in good i'aHh and lll..::oocdiU}}. to lbc lUlcs oflbc l.t8do o.ud Qfsdcntc,
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Volatile Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
Method:
Analysis:
1st Quarter Chloroform 2015
1503326
3/19/2015
3/17-3/19/2015
Intact
None
SW-846 8260C/5030C
Volatile Organic Compounds
General Set Comments: Multiple target analytes were observed above reporting limits.
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: All samples were received in appropriate
containers and properly preserved. The analysis and preparation of all samples were
performed within the method holding times following the methods stated on the analytical
reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, and Surrogates:
Method Blanks (MBs): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Surrogates: All surrogate recoveries were within established limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date; 3/31/2015 Page 4 of 25
Alluo;~lyscs llpplicnblc to the CWA, SDWA, nnd RCRA arc performed in accordnncc to NELAC protocols Pcnincnl sampling infunnation is localcd on the auachcd COC. Con6dl;fl\i41 Busin~"i lnibfmntion: This n:pon is provided for lb<! cxclusin:~ usc oflhc
addressee .. Privileges ofsl•bs~uent use of1hc name of this ccnnp~my or any member ofils sU1IT, or rcp\'Oduction of this r~port in connection with the ndvcniscmenL, prommion l11 snle oro.ny pn.'<tuc.:lorproce.s:., orin cotlucctiun with the re-.publknlian t)fthis 1'¢pcm
for r~ny purpose olhcr th11.n for tb~ llddrcsscc will be gr:mtcd only on contacL this Clllllpnny ut:ccpts no rcsponsibilily cx~cpl n.)J the due pcrfonmmcc of inspct:Liou nnd/or nMlysis in~ f!ilb and IH."Cording to lh~ :rules of the trade aud of ~citnet:.
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1503326
Project: lst Quarter Chloroform 2015
Analyte Result Units
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: (80 I) 263-8686, Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
Method MDL
Reporting
Limit
QC Type: LCS
Amount
Spiked
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R76798 DateAnalyzed: 03/19/20151755h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride
Lab Sample ID: LCS N03-R77035
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N)
4.87 mg/L E300.0
Date Analyzed: 03/27/2015 1732h
1.05 mg/L E353.2
0.00751 0.100 5.000 0 97.4
0.00833 0.0100 1.000 0 105
Limits
90-110
90. 110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 3/31/2015 Page 18 of 25
AIJ analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance ro NELAC protocols. Perrin~nt sampling information is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addre::-see. Privileges of subsequent use of the
name of this company or ~my member of its stafT, or reproduction of this report in connl!ction with the advertisement, promotion 01· sale of any product or process, or in connection with the 1 e-publication of this •eport for any purpose olhe!t than for the uddressl!t! will be granted only on contm;t, This
company accepts no resllonsibility except for the due p~rfonnance of inspection and/or nnalysis in good faith cmd according to the rules of the tmde and of science.
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1503326
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2015
Analyte Result
Lab Sample 10: MB-R76798 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride <0.100
Lab Sample 10: MB-R77035 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) < 0.0100
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
QC Type: MBLK
Reporting Amount Spike Ref.
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC
03/19/2015 1738h
mg/L E300.0 0.00751 0.100 -03/27/2015 1729h
n~IL E353.2 0.00833 0.0100
Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 3/31/20 15 Page 19 of 25
AIJ analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance ro NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling in10rmation is located on rbe attached COC Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the uddressee. Privileses of subsequent use of'l·h!!
name of this com puny or nJ'ly member of its stan~ or reproduction of this report in r.::onnection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any p1 otluct or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this n:port for any purpo~e othe1 than for the uddress.ee will be grnntt:d only on contact, This
company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection anlVor analysis in good faith and according to tbe rules of the trade and of science.
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1503326
Project: 1st Quarter Chlorofonn 2015
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: 1503326-002AMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 84.9
Lab Sample ID: 1503326-00IBMS N03 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.06
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: (80 I) 263-8687
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
QC Type: MS
Reporting Amount Spike Ref.
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC
03/19/2015 2134h
mg/L E300.0 0.0751 1.00 50.00 36.3 97.3 -03/27/2015 1847h
mg/L E353.2 0.00833 0.0100 1.000 0 106
Limits
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 3/31 /2015 Page 20 of 25
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, nnU RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pe1iinent stlmpling information is located on the attached COC. Confidential BusinfsS Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of lhe addressee. Privileges ofsubseqlll:~l1t ust: of the
name of this company or any rnem~r of irs staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or s<Jle of any product or process, 01 in connection with the !'~·publication of this 1eport fot• any purpose otlle1 than for the addressee will be grunted only on contnct. This
company accepts no responsibility except for the dLJe performance of inspection ~nd/or analysis in good faith cu1d according to the rules of the trade and of science.
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1503326
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2015
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: 1503326-002AMSD Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 84.2
Lab Sample ID: 1503326-00lBMSD N03 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nin11te/Nitrite (as N) 1.11
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: (80 I) 263-8687
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
QCType: MSD
Reporting Amount Spike Ref.
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC
03/19/2015 2151h
mg/L E300.0 0.0751 1.00 50.00 36.3 95.7 -03/27/2015 1849h
mg/L E353.2 0.00833 0.0100 1.000 0 Ill
1-Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
Limits
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit
84.9 0.905 20
1.06 4.53 10
Qual
Report Date: 3/31 /20 15 Page 21 of 25
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA. are perfonned in accordance to NELAC prutocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the auached COC. Conftdemial Businl!ss lnfom1ation: This report is provided for the exclusive use ofthe addressee. Privilege.." of subsequent use of the
name of this company or any member of irs staff, or r~production of this report in connection with the advertis~ment, promotion 01 sale of any product or process, or in conn~ction wirh the re-publication of this report f01 nny purpose other than fo1 the addrt:ssee will be gnmted only on contm:t. This
company accepts no responsibility except tbr the due perfonnance ofinspectioo and/or analysis in good fHith arid according to the rules of the trade a11tl of science
American West Analytical Laboratories UL
Den~on
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1503326
Due Date: 3/30/2015
Page 1 of2
Client:
Client ID:
Project:
Comments:
Sample II>
1503326-001A
1503326-001B
1503326-00IC
1503326-002A
l503326-002B
1503326-002C
1503326-003A
1503326-00JB
1503326-00JC
1503326-004A
1503326-004B
1503326-004C
1503326-005A
1503326-005B
1503326-005C
Printed: 3/19/2015
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
DENlOO Contact: Garrin Palmer
1st Quarter Chloroform 2015 QC Level: III WO Type: Project
PA Rush. QC 3 (Summary/No chromatograms). RL of 1 ppm for Chloride and VOC and 0.1 ppm for N02/N03. Expected levels provided by client-see
Jenn. J-flag what we can't meet. ElM Locus and EDD-Denison. Email Group.;
Client Sample II> Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
TW4-06R_03172015 3/17/2015 0930h 3/19/2015 0945h 300.0-W Aqueous df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
N02/N03-W-353.2 df-no2/no3
1 SEL AtiiJ!ytes: N03N02N
8260-W-DENlOO VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-DEN100; #of Analytes: 4 I # ofSurr: 4
~-32_03172015 3/17/2015 1400h 3/19/2015 0945b 300.0-W Aqueous df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
N02/N03-W -353.2 df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
8260-W-DEN100 VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-DEN100; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
11¥4-06_03182015 3/18/2015 0757h 3/19/2015 0945h 300.0-W Aqueous df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
N02/N03-W-353.2 df -no2/no3
1 SEL Analyta.~: N03N02N
8260-W-DEN100 VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-DEN100; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
11¥4-07_03182015 3/18/2015 0805h 3/19/2015 0945h 300.0-W Aqueous df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
N02/N03-W-353.2 df-no2/no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
8260-W-DEN100 VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-DEN100; #of Analytes: 4 I # ofSurr: 4
11¥4-10_03182015 3/18/2015 0812h 3/19/2015 0945h 300.0-W Aqueous df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
N02/N03-W-353.2 df-no2/no3
1 SELAnalytes: N03N02N
8260-W-DEN100 VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-DEN100; #of Analytes: 4 1# ofSurr: 4
3
3
.. .>
3
3
FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1): %M 0 RT 0 CN 0 TAT 0 QC 0 HOK __ _ HOK __ _ HOK__ coc Emailed J /11/ti ~
WORK ORDER Summary
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Sample ID Client Sample ID
1503326-006A 1rYV4-60_03172015
1503326-006B
1503326-006C
1503326-007 A Trip Blank
Collected Date Received Date Test Code
3/17/2015 0855h 3119/2015 0945h 300.0-W
1 SEL Analytes: CL
N02/N03-W-353.2
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
8260-W-DENIOO
Matrix
Aqueous
Work Order: 1503326
Due Date: 3/30/2015
Sel Storage
df-wc
df-no2/no3
VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-DEN100; #of Analytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
3/17/2015 3/19/2015 0945h 8260-W-DENlOO Aqueous VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-DENJ 00;· #of Analytes: 4 I# of Surr: 4
Page 2 of2
Printed: 3/19/2015 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M 0 RT 0 CN 0 TAT 0 QC 0 HOK HOK __ _ HOK___ COC Emalled=------
CUI!NT:
ADDRESS:
CoNTACT:
PHONE#:
EMAIL:
PROJECT NAME:
AMERICAN WEST
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 W . 3600 S. SALT LAKE CtTY. UT 84115
PHONE # [phone] TOLL FREE # [phone]
FAX # [phone] EMAIL [e-mail]
WWW.AWAL-LABS.COM
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy. 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Garrin Palmer
(4351678-2221 ce~~ #:
tpa:[e-mail] KW:erDel@energyfu-diir-.c..,o"'m""; _______ __
d.~
1st Quarter chloroform 2015
CHAIN OF CUSTODY /$d ~34-P
ALL ANALYSIS WILL Bl! CONDUCTeD USING NELAP ACCRI!OITI!D Mi.THOOS AND AU. DATA WILL BE REPCJRTIED USING AWAL's
STANDARD ANALYTe USTS AND REPORTING tAUT'S (PQL) UN1..£SS SPBCIF\CAU.Y R2QUI!STED OTMI!RWISI! ON TMIS CHAtN OF
CUS1'0DV AND/oR. ATTAcHeD OOCUMI!NTATION.
AWAL w~:;s:;;:;.PLE SET#
PAGE OF 1-QC ~BVBL: I TURN .AROUND TIMB:
STANDARD
Utd•.:a:a crn::wtt ~~lQ:!:.I.Ie)m H.t.;':'l: Du.af1):;.c-1i;i. · ·""'
OftN htADe. =M)NI!D RDOJnc wtlL ••
... ""-"'>IV 5;PO l'lo! 01' T>ll <MV -..-11'' ~ ~~·· .~:.~ ~ ,,
-~: __ ~--~.::---AAI! 1>\1&.
X INC~UDE EDD:
LOCUS UPLOAD
EXCEL
FIELD FILTERED FoR:
' _JJ: ......
' .·t."'~:.;.~~~~~~·k -.~ --w:~6 -~· ~.,~~.....,.:..! ~
li;·i; " ·; 8-.:~···,v-·-· ~ez"~~:~~rvx-; .-........ ~ .. -~ .. -~··· ....._--------u-2--:' .. -·-~--=. .. ·, . '
FoR COMPLIANC:B WITH: ·, . • :'. \:_'·~.:"", t•· '',0
Cl NELAP b · ~n;~~Aiul\.~ · "' > ' "'"' -occ D RCRA ~· ..:.~ ... "':.\ "-"":"~-. i. ~~ ,
0 CWA ..4-,1\~J~S'R~~~•'
0 SDWA , , .''~~~~e-' '~ 0 ELAP I A2LA '' . ,y ,' · ·-; 'i; '•t 1i
0 NLLAP ;. :"'• ... -~ _ "~·~~~ ... ,:. · '~ n
D NoN-COMPUANCE ~~i;,~¥-Y1'!U!"'J'·,· ~o
0 OTHER: --~ ~· ~ • ~ • ~--1£~z~::::-: .. :· -~ .4~~:
KNOWN HAZARDS , 't. -~~-~~~;: J,;.. .-~·-"-, \
~ ~ ' ...._ --~~ '1 -;~!__. .. & ~-~~. ',·><.·t ;·
..... --...... __ _ .. _ _ SAMPLE COMMENTS ~·: ,~:~ ~ ._-~: ~::e\:-; ~{~~ ~·
-------------4~~~~--~~~-F~~~~;t--r-l--1--t--t--t--r-1--r---------------~~~~~~~::I~;:;
.,. •'-'j\'~ ; ... JN .. , t"~ !j~. •
--..... .'C,?....... ·~ • ; .. ~ ~ .. .:--. -:. -----------+~~~~~~-...;~~-~-f:....~:-+-~+~+-+-+-i-i--lr-lr-r--r'lr-------------,.--~-, ~~,..~~:=~"'1:<$P.7 ·
1"-:r~.i>..iJ:-..;::C': .. ' -----------4.:~:.!.~~~-~~:..--t-t:.+-~+.::.-+~-+--t--t--t--ii-t--t--t-t-t-------------, ~~Ps~;;~~, ~: -:
I I -~;-. ,q_-"i' ~· N~.· _.-d
DATe:
[TIMe::
DA"l"E!:
triME'
DATI!:
ITiMI!!!:
~v~ -·~~~~____:,-. "' ~--. ;' ---~--:-~ ... . ~·il<~sr.w.a .. ~ 4-A .. ~ a.NZi,Coc-~·-~ ~ ..-.,., ··-: I. rv ..... --· , t 1 ·;\, ••• ~ r.._. ,1"-. ,, ~ ',.i
· -., . ·:. · -:r.·., 2~~1:1
-~ ~ ·-:..
~
SPE<!IAL. INSTRUCTIONS:
. ,.
~ .::--""~' ~_;;
.... -..O"'r
Analysis
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
N02&N03
O&G
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TP04
Procedure:
Frequency:
Preservation Check Sheet
-.-·· ·.------------------s le Set E
Preservative l 2.-.. 0 tf .J &
pH <2 H2S04
pH<2 H2 S04
pH >12
NaOH
pH <2 HN03
pH <2 H2S04 VcJ ~ 1/~ v~ Ves /e~
pH <2 HCL I I
pH <2 H2S04
pH >9NaOH,
Zn Acetate
pH <2 H2S04
pH <2 H2S04
Pour a smnll nmount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from Lid gently over wide range pH pnper
Do Not clip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
loH ··--
I
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
If sample is not preserved, properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag COC, notify client if requested
Place client conversation on COC
Samples may be adjusted
All samples requiring preservation
*
+
....
#
•
The sample required additional preservative upon receipt.
The sample was received unpreserved
The Sample was received unpreserved and therefore preserved upon receipt.
The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH< 2 due to the sample matrix
The sample pH was unadjnstable to a pH > __ due to the sample matrix interference
Lab Set 10: IS G 3:f-t--.VJ ,
TabH
Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
H-1 Field Data QAJQC Evaluation
Volume
Location Casing Volume 2x Casing Volume Pumped Volume Check
Piezometer 1 --
Piezometer 2 -
Piezometer 3 --
TWN-1 33.70 67.40 88.00 OK
TWN-2 NA Continuously Pumped Well
TWN-3 37.28 74.56 47.60 Pumped Dry
TWN-4 47.47 94.94 121.00 OK
TWN-7 12.47 24.94 16.50 Pumped Dry
TWN-18 55.64 111.28 132.00 OK
TW4-22 NA Continuously pumped well
TW4-24 NA (:onLi nu1uusly pumped well r
TW4-25 NA Comi11uously pumped well
NC =Not Calculated
TWN-2, TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-25 are continuously pumping wells.
Piezometers 1, 2, and 3 were not pumped, only one set of parameters were taken.
TWN-3 and TWN-7 were pumped dry and sampled after recovery.
CQitduc.:livity
2124
790
2764
851.0 853.0
2948
2294.0 2299.0
1063.0 1063.0
1229.0 1237.0
2250.0 2247.0
6073
7593
2891
~~~~~~
II RPD
NC
NC
NC
0.23 6.76
NC
0.22 6.60
0.00 6.52
0.65 6.20
0.13 6.16
NC
NC
NC
pH }lPb Tenl_l) RPD Rt:dox Potential RPD Turbidit.y, RPb
8.93 NC 13.20 NC 193 NC 0.0 NC
6.87 NC 13.34 NC 299 NC 0.0 NC
11.23 NC 13.25 NC 148 NC 0.0 NC
6.78 0.30 15.06 15 .07 0.07 194 I 193 0.52 0.0 I 0.0 0.00
6.56 NC 14.71 NC 311 NC 0.0 NC
6.59 0.15 13.99 13.99 0.00 NM NC NM NC
6.52 0.00 14.73 14.73 0.00 224 I 224 0.00 0.0 I 0.0 0.00
6.25 0.80 13.98 14.01 0.21 NM NC NM NC
6.16 0.00 14.54 14.52 0.14 178 I 178 0.00 0.0 I 0.0 0.00
6.28 NC 15.25 NC 200 NC 0.0 NC
6.24 NC 15.61 NC 220 NC 0.0 NC
6.56 NC 15.00 NC 149 NC 0.0 NC
H-2: Holding Time Evaluation
Allowed
Hold Time Hold Time Hold Time
Location ID Parameter Name Sample Date Analysis Date (Days) (Days) Check
PIEZ-01 Chloride 02118/2015 02/25/2015 7 28 OK
PIEZ-01 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 02118/2015 03/04/2015 14 28 OK
PIEZ-02 Chloride 02118/2015 02/25/2015 7 28 OK
PIEZ-02 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 02118/2015 03/04/2015 14 28 OK
PIEZ-03 Chloride 02/18/2015 02/25/2015 7 28 OK
PIEZ-03 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 02/18/2015 03/04/2015 14 28 OK
TWN-01 Chloride 02/18/2015 02/25/2015 7 28 OK
TWN-01 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 02/18/2015 03/04/2015 14 28 OK
TWN-02 Chloride 02/18/2015 02/25/2015 7 28 OK
TWN-02 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 02/18/2015 03/04/2015 14 28 OK
TWN-03 Chloride 02/19/2015 02/25/2015 6 28 OK
TWN-03 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 02/19/2015 03/04/2015 13 28 OK
TWN-04 Chloride 02/18/2015 02/25/2015 7 28 OK
TWN-04 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 02/18/2015 03/04/2015 14 28 OK
TWN-07 Chloride 02/19/2015 02/25/2015 6 28 OK
TWN-07 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 02/19/2015 03/04/2015 13 28 OK
TWN-07R Chloride 02/18/2015 02/25/2015 7 28 OK
TWN-07R Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 02/18/2015 03/04/2015 14 28 OK
TWN-18 Chloride 02/18/2015 02/25/2015 7 28 OK
TWN-18 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 02/18/2015 03/04/2015 14 28 OK
TW4-22 Chloride 03/09/2015 03/17/2015 8 28 OK
TW4-22 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 03/09/2015 03/20/2015 11 28 OK
TW4-24 Chloride 03/09/2015 03/17/2015 8 28 OK
TW4-24 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 03/09/2015 03/20/2015 11 28 OK
TW4-25 Chloride 03/09/2015 03/17/2015 8 28 OK
TW4-25 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 03/09/2015 03/20/2015 11 28 OK
TW4-60 Chloride 03/17/2015 03/19/2015 2 28 OK
TW4-60 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 03/17/2015 03/27/2015 10 28 OK
TWN-60 Chloride 02/19/2015 02/25/2015 6 28 OK
TWN-60 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 02/19/2015 03/04/2015 13 28 OK
TWN-65 Chloride 02/18/2015 02/25/2015 7 28 OK
TWN-65 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 02/18/2015 03/04/2015 14 28 OK
H-3: Analytical Method Check
Pilr~uneur ~elJi()d Method Usedh,Y'L~
Nitrate E353.1 or E353.2 E353.2
A4500-Cl B or A4500-Cl E
Chloride orE300.0 E300.0
Both Nitrate and Chloride were analyzed with the correct analytical method.
-eponmg H4.R! lffilt ec L' . Ch k
Required
Lab Reporting Reporting Dilution
Location Analyte Limit Units Qualifier Limit RLCheck Factor
PIEZ-01 Chloride 10 mg/L 1 OK 10
PIEZ-OI Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) O.I mg/L O.I OK IO
PIEZ-02 Chloride 10 mg/L I OK IO
PIEZ-02 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) O.OI mg/L O.I OK I
PIEZ-03 Chloride IO mg/L 1 OK 10
PIEZ-03 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.01 mg/L O.I OK I
TWN-OI Chloride 10 mg/L I OK 10
TWN-OI Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) O.OI mg/L O.I OK I
TWN-02 Chloride 10 mg/L 1 OK 10
TWN-02 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) I mg/L O.I OK 100
TWN-03 Chloride 100 mg/L I OK 100
TWN-03 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) O.I mg/L 0.1 OK 10
TWN-04 Chloride 10 mg/L I OK IO
TWN-04 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) O.OI mg/L O.I OK I
TWN-07 Chloride 1 mg/L 1 OK 1
TWN-07 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.01 mg!L 0.1 OK 1
TWN-07R Chloride 1 mg/L u 1 OK 1
TWN-07R Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L u 0.1 OK 1
TWN-18 Chloride 10 mg/L 1 OK IO
TWN-18 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.01 mg/L 0.1 OK 1
TW4-22 Chloride 100 mg/L 1 OK 100
TW4-22 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10 mg/L 0.1 OK 100
TW4-24 Chloride 100 mg/L 1 OK 100
TW4-24 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10 mg/L 0.1 OK 100
TW4-25 Chloride 100 mg/L 1 OK 100
TW4-25 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1 mg/L 0.1 OK 10
TW4-60 Chloride 1 mg/L u 1 OK 1
TW4-60 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) O.I mg/L u O.I OK 1
TWN-60 Chloride 1 mg/L u I OK 1
TWN-60 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) O.I mg/L u 0.1 OK 1
TWN-65 Chloride 10 mg/L 1 OK 10
TWN-65 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.01 mg!L 0.1 OK 1
U = Value was reported by the laboratory as nondetect.
H-5 QAJQC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
H-6 QC Control Limits for Analysis and Blanks
Method Blank Detections
All Method Blanks for the quarter were non-detect.
M.aEnX. :SDlKC 'Yo x eaoverv urn oans.0n-
Lab Report Lab Sample ID Well Analyte MS %REC
1502347 1502347-011BMS Piez-03 Nitrate
1502347 1502347-001BMS TWN-07 Nitrate
1503226 1503226-021BMS TW4-33 Nitrate
1503226 1503226-032BMS TW4-19 Nitrate
1503326 1503326-001BMS TW4-06R Nitrate
* -Recovery was not calculated because the analyte of the sample was greater than 4 times the spike amount
N/A-QC was not performed on an EFRI sample.
NC-Not calculated
Laboratory Control Sample
All Laboratory Control Samples were within acceptance limits for the quarter.
1150
200
132
94
106
REC
MSD%REC Range RPD
1060 90-110 7.00
140 90-110 21.8
132 90-110 0.0929
114 90-110 2.12
111 90-110 4.53
H7R . T E 1 -CCeJpl cmpcn'Jlur~ va uatwn , Samwe· Batch -we~rsr:m Jhlttb Temperlfture;
Piezometer 1, Piezometer 2, Piezometer 3, TWN-1 , TWN-2,
1502347 TWN-3, TWN-4, TWN-7, TWN-07R, TWN-18, TWN-60, 2.2 oc
TWN-65
1503226 TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, TW4-60 2.9 oc
1503326 TW4-60 3.4 °C
H-8 Rinsate Evaluation
All rinsate and DI blank samples were non-detect for the quarter.
Tab I
Kriged Current Quarter Isoconcentration Maps
NS = not sampled; NO = not detected
......_ 1 0 kriged nitrate isocon and label
TW4-37 temporary perched monitoring well + NS installed March, 2015 (not sampled)
MW-4 perched monitoring well showing e 5.8 concentration in mg/L
TW4·7
Q 4.3
TWN·1
<>1.4
PIEZ·1
~ 6.4
temporary perched monitoring well
showing concentration in mg/L
temporary perched nitrate monitoring
well showing concentration in mg/L
perched piezometer showing
concentration in mg/L
TW4·35 temporary perched monitoring well
~ 0.44 installed May, 2014 showing
concentration in mg/L
NOTE: MW·4. MW-26, TW4-1, TW4-2, TW4-4, TW4-11 ,TW4-19; and TW4-20 are chloroform pulliplflg wel!s: TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4·25, and TWN-2 are nitrate pumping well
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
KRIGED 1st QUARTER, 2015 NITRATE (mg/L)
(NITRATE + NITRITE AS N)
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE REFERENCE FIGURE
H:/718000/may15/nitrate/Unt0315_rev.srf I I -1
NS = not sampled; ND = not detected
...._ 100 kriged chloride isocon and label
TW4·37
+Ns
MW-4
.41
TW4-7
Q 40
TWN-1
~28
PIEZ-1
.. 67
TW4-36 ~67
temporary perched monitoring well
installed March, 2015 (not sampled)
perched monitoring well showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched monitoring well
showing concentration in mg/L
temporary perched nitrate monitoring
well showing concentration in mg/L
perched piezometer showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched monitoring well
installed May, 2014 showing
concentration in mg/L
NOTE: MW-4, MW-26, TW4-1, TW4-2, TW4-4, TW4-11 ,TW4-19, and TW4-20 are chloroform pumping wells; TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 are nitrate pumping we.U
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
KRIGED 1st QUARTER, 2015 CHLORIDE (mg/L)
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE REFERENCE I FIGURE
H:/718000/may15/chloride/Ucl0315_rev.srf I-2
TabJ
Analyte Concentrations Over Time
Piezometer 1
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/19/2009 6.8 NA
7/14/2009 6.8 60
9/22/2009 7.3 78
10/27/2009 7.4 61
6/2/2010 7.2 52
7/19/2010 6.8 52
12/10/2010 6.5 60
1/31/2011 7 60
4/25/2011 6.8 58
7/25/2011 7 53
10/19/2011 6.6 55
1/11/2012 7.1 78
4/20/2012 6.6 58
7/27/2012 7.2 56
10/17/2012 7.66 55
2/18/2013 8.11 56.7
4/24/2013 8.88 53.3
8/28/2013 7.83 55.1
10/16/2013 6.68 54.1
1/13/2014 6.79 56.2
5/7/2014 7.57 52.1
8/6/2014 5.1 55
10/8/2014 5.75 57.6
2/18/2015 6.41 55.9
Piezometer 2
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/19/2009 0.5 NA
7/14/2009 0.5 7
9/22/2009 0.5 17
10/27/2009 0.6 7
6/2/2010 0.6 8
7/19/2010 0.6 8
12/10/2010 0.2 6
1/31/2011 0.3 9
4/25/2011 0.3 8
7/25/2011 0.1 9
10/19/2011 0.1 8
1/11/2012 0.1 9
4/20/2012 0.2 8
7/27/2012 0.2 9
10/17/2012 0.192 9.5
2/19/2013 0.218 9.67
4/24/2013 0.172 10.3
8/28/2013 0.198 9.66
10/16/2013 0.364 9.22
1/13/2014 0.169 11.4
5/7/2014 0.736 11.4
8/6/2014 0.8 12
10/8/2014 0.755 12.2
2/18/2015 0.749 12.6
Piezometer 3
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/19/2009 0.7 NA
7/14/2009 0.8 12
9/22/2009 0.8 24
10/27/2009 1.2 19
3/24/2010 1.7 116
6/2/2010 1.6 36
7/19/2010 1.6 35
12/10/2010 1.8 25
1/31/2011 1.8 40
4/25/2011 1.7 35
7/25/2011 1.8 61
10/19/2011 1.7 12
1/11/2012 1.8 20
4/20/2012 1.7 53
7/27/2012 1.8 21
10/17/2012 2.75 20.1
2/19/2013 1.85 21
4/24/2013 1.83 21.2
8/28/2013 1.81 22.4
10/16/2013 1.80 23.5
1/13/2014 1.70 26.0
5/7/2014 1.79 23.9
8/6/2014 1.7 26
10/8/2014 1.74 28.3
2/18/2015 1.82 27.1
TWN-1
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/6/2009 0.7 19
7/21/2009 0.4 17
9/21/2009 0.4 19
10/28/2009 0.5 18
3/17/2010 0.5 17
5/26/2010 0.6 20
9/27/2010 0.6 19
12/7/2010 0.6 14
1/26/2011 0.5 17
4/20/2011 0.5 19
7/26/2011 0.5 14
10/17/2011 0.5 10
1/9/2012 0.6 15
4/18/2012 0.6 17
7/24/2012 0.6 17
10/15/2012 0.432 17.5
2/18/2013 0.681 17.6
4/23/2013 0.84 17.4
8/27/2013 1.24 24.1
10/16/2013 1.61 26.8
1/14/2014 1.47 29.2
5/6/2014 1.63 31.1
8/5/2014 1.7 28
10/8/2014 1.46 27.6
2/18/2015 1.37 27.8
TWN-2
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/6/2009 25.4 29
7/21/2009 25 25
9/21/2009 22.6 17
11/2/2009 20.8 55
3/24/2010 62 .1 85
6/2/2010 69 97
9/29/2010 69 104
12/9/2010 48 93
2/1/2011 43 93
4/28/2011 40 85
7/28/2011 33 74
10/20/2011 33 76
1/12/2012 31 86
4/20/2012 48 103
7/31/2012 54 93
10/17/2012 22.1 79
2/19/2013 57.3 80.5
4/24/2013 57.7 82.1
8/27/2013 80 75.9
10/16/2013 111 70.4
1/13/2014 42.6 72.4
5/7/2014 44.7 84.9
8/6/2014 42 80
10/8/2014 70.6 81
2/18/2015 48.6 84.8
TWN-3
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/6/2009 23.6 96
7/21/2009 25.3 96
9/21/2009 27.1 99
11/2/2009 29 106
3/25/2010 25.3 111
6/3/2010 26 118
7/15/2010 27 106
12/10/2010 24 117
2/1/2011 24 138
4/28/2011 26 128
7/29/2011 25 134
10/20/2011 25 129
1/12/2012 25 143
4/20/2012 24 152
7/31/2012 27 158
10/17/2012 12.1 149
2/19/2013 22.2 157
4/24/2013 27.2 158
8/28/2013 20.9 171
10/17/2013 23.5 163
1/15/2014 19.6 160
5/7/2014 23.6 168
8/6/2014 19.5 174
10/9/2014 19.1 153
2/19/2015 19.4 164
TWN-4
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/6/2009 1 13
7/21/2009 0.05 12
9/21/2009 0.4 13
10/28/2009 0.4 11
3/16/2010 0.9 22
5/27/2010 1.0 22
9/27/2010 0.9 19
12/8/2010 1 21
1/25/2011 0.9 21
4/20/2011 0.9 21
7/26/2011 1.1 35
10/18/2011 0.9 20
1/9/2012 0.9 20
4/18/2012 1.1 24
7/25/2012 1.4 25
10/15/2012 1.45 26.4
2/18/2013 1.51 25.3
4/23/2013 1.63 24.4
8/27/2013 1.58 27.2
10/16/2013 1.69 29.4
1/14/2014 1.41 28.4
5/6/2014 1.55 29.6
8/5/2014 2.0 28
10/8/2014 1.44 30.7
2/18/2015 1.48 31.5
TWN-7
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
8/25/2009 ND 11.00
9/21/2009 ND 7.00
11/10/2009 0.1 7.00
3/17/2010 0.8 6.00
5/28/2010 1.2 6.00
7/14/2010 1.6 7.00
12/10/2010 1 4.00
1/27/2011 1.3 6.00
4/21/2011 1.7 6.00
7/29/2011 0.7 5.00
10/19/2011 2.2 6.00
1/11/2012 2.3 5.00
4/20/2012 1.2 6.00
7/26/2012 0.9 6.00
10/16/2012 0.641 5.67
2/19/2013 0.591 5.68
4/24/2013 1.16 5.88
8/28/2013 0.835 6.96
10/16/2013 0.986 5.70
1/15/2014 0.882 5.75
5/7/2014 0.564 5.26
8/6/2014 0.9 6.00
10/9/2014 0.968 5.93
2/19/2015 1.04 5.58
TWN-18
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
11/2/2009 1.3 57
3/17/2010 1.6 42
6/1/2010 1.8 63
9/27/2010 1.8 64
12/9/2010 1.6 59
1/27/2011 1.4 61
4/26/2011 1.8 67
7/28/2011 1.8 65
10/18/2011 1.9 60
1/10/2012 1.9 64
4/19/2012 2.1 64
7/26/2012 2.3 67
10/16/2012 1.95 67.5
2/18/2013 2.27 68.7
4/23/2013 2.32 64.3
8/27/2013 2.04 70.4
10/16/2013 2.15 67.3
1/14/2014 2.33 68.4
5/6/2014 2.18 76.5
8/5/2014 1.8 70
10/8/2014 1.47 74.8
2/18/2015 1.00 73.3
TW4-19
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
7/22/2002 42.80 12/7/2005 81
9/12/2002 47.60 3/9/2006 86
3/28/2003 61.40 7/20/2006 123
6/23/2003 11.40 11/9/2006 134
7/15/2003 6.80 2/28/2007 133
8/15/2003 4.00 8/15/2007 129
9/12/2003 5.70 10/10/2007 132
9/25/2003 9.20 3/26/2008 131
10/29/2003 7.70 6/25/2008 128
11/9/2003 4.80 9/10/2008 113
8/16/2004 9.91 10/15/2008 124
9/17/2004 4.50 3/4/2009 127
3/16/2005 5.30 6/23/2009 132
6/7/2005 5.70 9/14/2009 43
8/31/2005 4.60 12/14/2009 124
12/1/2005 0.10 2/17/2010 144
3/9/2006 4.00 6/9/2010 132
6/14/2006 5.20 8/16/2010 142
7/20/2006 4.30 10/11/2010 146
11/9/2006 4.60 2/17/2011 135
2/28/2007 4.00 6/7/2011 148
8/15/2007 4.10 8/17/2011 148
10/10/2007 4.00 11/17/2011 148
3/26/2008 2.20 1/23/2012 138
6/25/2008 2.81 6/6/2012 149
9/10/2008 36.20 9/5/2012 149
10/15/2008 47.80 10/3/2012 150
3/4/2009 3.20 2/11/2013 164
6/23/2009 2.40 6/5/2013 148
9/14/2009 0.10 9/3/2013 179
12/14/2009 26.70 10/29/2013 206
2/17/2010 2.00 1/27/2014 134
6/9/2010 4.40 5/19/2014 152
8/16/2010 5.90 8/11/2014 140
10/11/2010 2.70 10/21/2014 130
2/17/2011 17.00 3/9/2015 238
6/7/2011 12.00
8/17/2011 3.00
11/17/2011 5.00
1/23/2012 0.60
6/6/2012 2.40
9/5/2012 2.50
10/3/2012 4.10
2/11/2013 7.99
6/5/2013 2.95
9/3/2013 17.60
10/29/2013 4.70
1/27/2014 1.62
5/19/2014 1.34
8/11/2014 1.60
10/21/2014 4.72
3/9/2015 8.56
The sampling program for TW4-19 was updated in the fourth quarter of 2005
to include analysis for chloride as well as nitrate. This change accounts for the
different number of data points represented above.
TW4-21
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
5/25/2005 14.6 12/7/2005 353
8/31/2005 10.1 3/9/2006 347
11/30/2005 9.6 7/20/2006 357
3/9/2006 8.5 11/8/2006 296
6/14/2006 10.2 2/28/2007 306
7/20/2006 8.9 6/27/2007 327
11/8/2006 8.7 8/15/2007 300
2/28/2007 8.7 10/10/2007 288
6/27/2007 8.6 3/26/2008 331
8/15/2007 8.6 6/25/2008 271
10/10/2007 8.3 9/10/2008 244
3/26/2008 14.3 10/15/2008 284
6/25/2008 8.8 3/11/2009 279
9/10/2008 7.6 6/24/2009 291
10/15/2008 8.0 9/15/2009 281
3/11/2009 8.3 12/22/2009 256
6/24/2009 8.1 2/25/2010 228
9/15/2009 9.2 6/10/2010 266
12/22/2009 8.4 8/12/2010 278
2/25/2010 8.4 10/13/2010 210
6/10/2010 12.0 2/22/2011 303
8/12/2010 14.0 6/1/2011 297
10/13/2010 7.0 8/17/2011 287
2/22/2011 9.0 11/16/2011 276
6/1/2011 13.0 1/19/2012 228
8/17/2011 14.0 6/13/2012 285
11/16/2011 13.0 9/13/2012 142
1/19/2012 15.0 10/4/2012 270
6/13/2012 11.0 2/13/2013 221
9/13/2012 13.0 6/18/2013 243
10/4/2012 14.0 9/12/2013 207
2/13/2013 11.8 11/13/2013 206
6/18/2013 13.8 2/5/2014 200
9/12/2013 10.3 5/22/2014 243
11/13/2013 9.0 8/27/2014 230
2/5/2014 11.4 10/29/2014 252
5/22/2014 11.5 3/12/2015 255
8/27/2014 7.1
10/29/2014 10.0
3/12/2015 10.9
The sampling program for TW4-21 was updated in the fourth quarter of 2005
to include analysis for chloride as well as nitrate. This change accounts for the
different number of data points represented above.
TW4-22
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/28/2007 20.9 347
6/27/2007 19.3 273
8/15/2007 19.3 259
10/10/2007 18.8 238
3/26/2008 39.1 519
6/25/2008 41.9 271
9/10/2008 38.7 524
10/15/2008 36.3 539
3/11/2009 20.7 177
6/24/2009 20.6 177
9/15/2009 40.3 391
12/29/2009 17.8 175
3/3/2010 36.6 427
6/15/2010 19 134
8/12/2010 18 127
8/24/2010 15 130
10/13/2010 16 134
2/23/2011 18 114
6/1/2011 17 138
8/17/2011 15 120
11/16/2011 19 174
1/19/2012 14 36
6/13/2012 12.8 35
9/12/2012 7 121
10/4/2012 14 130
2/11/2013 58 635
6/5/2013 50.2 586
9/3/2013 29.7 487
10/29/2013 45.2 501
1/27/2014 54.6 598
5/19/2014 47.2 614
8/11/2014 41.5 540
10/21/2014 54.9 596
3/9/2015 69.2 675
TW4-24
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
6/27/2007 26.1 770
8/15/2007 29 791
10/10/2007 24.7 692
3/26/2008 24.4 740
6/25/2008 45.3 834
9/10/2008 38.4 1180
10/15/2008 44.6 1130
3/4/2009 30.5 1010
6/24/2009 30.4 759
9/15/2009 30.7 618
12/17/2009 28.3 1080
2/25/2010 33.1 896
6/9/2010 30 639
8/11/2010 32 556
8/24/2010 31 587
10/6/2010 31 522
2/17/2011 31 1100
5/26/2011 35 1110
8/17/2011 34 967
11/16/2011 35 608
1/18/2012 37 373
6/6/2012 37 355
8/30/2012 37 489
10/3/2012 38 405
2/11/2013 35.9 1260
6/5/2013 23.7 916
9/3/2013 32.6 998
10/29/2013 34.6 1030
1/27/2014 31.6 809
5/19/2014 35 1020
8/11/2014 31.5 1150
10/21/2014 35.7 1050
3/9/2015 34.6 944
TW4-25
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
6/27/2007 17.1 395
8/15/2007 16.7 382
10/10/2007 17 356
3/26/2008 18.7 374
6/25/2008 22.1 344
9/10/2008 18.8 333
10/15/2008 21.3 366
3/4/2009 15.3 332
6/24/2009 15.3 328
9/15/2009 3.3 328
12/16/2009 14.2 371
2/23/2010 14.4 296
6/8/2010 16 306
8/10/2010 14 250
10/5/2010 15 312
2/16/2011 15 315
5/25/2011 16 321
8/16/2011 16 276
11/15/2011 16 294
1/18/2012 16 304
5/31/2012 16 287
9/11/2012 17 334
10/3/2012 17 338
2/11/2013 9.04 190
6/5/2013 5.24 136
9/3/2013 5.69 119
10/29/2013 6.10 88.6
1/27/2014 2.16 85.7
5/19/2014 1.21 51.1
8/11/2014 1.6 67
10/21/2014 1.03 58.1
3/9/2015 14.4 310
MW-30
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
6/22/2005 12.4 6/22/2005 125
9/22/2005 12.8 9/22/2005 125
12/14/2005 13.6 12/14/2005 128
3/22/2006 13.8 3/22/2006 125
6/21/2006 14.5 6/21/2006 124
9/13/2006 14.1 9/13/2006 118
10/25/2006 14.6 10/25/2006 124
3/15/2007 14.4 3/15/2007 125
8/22/2007 14.6 8/22/2007 126
10/24/2007 14.9 10/24/2007 122
3/19/2008 14.8 3/19/2008 118
6/3/2008 18.7 6/3/2008 125
8/4/2008 17.3 8/4/2008 121
11/5/2008 15.6 11/5/2008 162
2/3/2009 15.3 2/3/2009 113
5/13/2009 15.1 5/13/2009 122
8/24/2009 20.9 8/24/2009 118
10/14/2009 15.0 10/14/2009 129
1/20/2010 15.4 1/20/2010 106
2/9/2010 16.1 2/9/2010 127
4/27/2010 15.8 4/27/2010 97
5/24/2010 17.0 9/14/2010 111
6/15/2010 15.3 11/9/2010 126
8/24/2010 16.0 2/1/2011 134
9/14/2010 15.0 4/11/2011 134
10/19/2010 15.0 5/10/2011 128
11/9/2010 15.0 6/20/2011 127
12/14/2010 16.0 7/5/2011 127
1/10/2011 15.0 8/3/2011 126
2/1/2011 16.0 9/7/2011 145
3/14/2011 17.0 10/4/2011 129
4/11/2011 16.0 11/8/2011 122
5/10/2011 16.0 12/12/2011 124
6/20/2011 17.0 1/24/2012 124
7/5/2011 17.0 2/14/2012 126
8/3/2011 14.0 3/14/2012 128
9/7/2011 16.0 4/10/2012 128
10/4/2011 16.0 5/2/2012 124
11/8/2011 16.0 6/18/2012 131
12/12/2011 16.0 7/10/2012 128
1/24/2012 17.0 8/7/2012 139
2/14/2012 17.0 9/19/2012 130
3/14/2012 18.0 10/23/2012 135
4/10/2012 17.0 11/13/2012 114
5/2/2012 16.0 12/26/2012 122
MW-30
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
6/18/2012 15.0 1/23/2013 128
7/10/2012 17.0 2/26/2013 129
8/7/2012 18.0 3/20/2013 126
9/19/2012 16.0 4/17/2013 117
10/23/2012 16.2 5/15/2013 119
11/13/2012 18.5 6/25/2013 127
12/26/2012 17.2 7/10/2013 130
1/23/2013 19.2 8/20/2013 126
2/26/2013 21.4 9/18/2013 131
3/20/2013 14.3 10/22/2013 128
4/17/2013 16.8 11/20/2013 124
5/15/2013 18.8 12/18/2013 134
6/25/2013 16.1 1/8/2014 131
7/10/2013 17.6 2/25/2014 135
8/20/2013 16.4 3/11/2014 144
9/18/2013 16.9 4/23/2014 154
10/22/2013 19.7 5/14/2014 128
11/20/2013 19.5 6/3/2014 128
12/18/2013 20.7 7/29/2014 140
1/8/2014 20.3 8/20/2014 139
2/25/2014 18.4 9/9/2014 136
3/11/2014 21.3 10/7/2014 136
4/23/2014 18.3 11/10/2014 154
5/14/2014 17.9 12/10/2014 138
6/3/2014 19.4 1/21/2015 144
7/29/2014 15.6 2/4/2015 136
8/20/2014 13.8 3/3/2015 132
9/9/2014 16.8
10/7/2014 11.0
11/10/2014 16.2
12/10/2014 17.1
1/21/2015 19.5
2/4/2015 14.9
3/3/2015 17.3
Under the groundwater sampling program, accelerated monitoring for nitrate began in MW-
30 prior to when the accelerated monitoring for chloride began. This difference accounts for
the different number of data points represented above.
MW-31
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
6/22/2005 24.2 6/22/2005 139
9/22/2005 22.4 9/22/2005 136
12/14/2005 23.8 12/14/2005 135
3/22/2006 24.1 3/22/2006 133
6/21/2006 25.3 6/21/2006 138
9/13/2006 24.6 9/13/2006 131
10/25/2006 25.1 10/25/2006 127
3/15/2007 23.2 3/15/2007 132
3/15/2007 22.0 3/15/2007 132
8/27/2007 23.3 8/27/2007 136
10/24/2007 24.6 10/24/2007 122
3/19/2008 25.0 3/19/2008 124
6/3/2008 29.3 6/3/2008 128
8/4/2008 28.7 8/4/2008 124
11/11/2008 29.9 11/11/2008 119
2/3/2009 23.4 2/3/2009 115
5/13/2009 22.4 5/13/2009 124
8/24/2009 15.4 8/24/2009 122
10/14/2009 22.6 10/14/2009 138
2/9/2010 21.7 2/9/2010 128
4/20/2010 22.5 4/20/2010 128
5/21/2010 23.0 9/13/2010 139
6/15/2010 21.1 11/9/2010 138
8/24/2010 22.0 2/1/2011 145
9/13/2010 21.0 4/1/2011 143
10/19/2010 20.0 5/10/2011 143
11/9/2010 20.0 6/20/2011 145
12/14/2010 20.0 7/5/2011 148
1/10/2011 19.0 8/2/2011 148
2/1/2011 21.0 9/6/2011 148
3/14/2011 22.0 10/3/2011 145
4/1/2011 21.0 11/8/2011 145
5/10/2011 20.0 12/12/2011 148
6/20/2011 22.0 1/24/2012 155
7/5/2011 22.0 2/13/2012 150
8/2/2011 20.0 3/13/2012 152
9/6/2011 21.0 4/9/2012 160
10/3/2011 21.0 5/2/2012 151
11/8/2011 21.0 6/18/2012 138
12/12/2011 21.0 7/9/2012 161
1/24/2012 21.0 8/6/2012 175
2/13/2012 21.0 9/18/2012 172
3/13/2012 22.0 10/22/2012 157
4/9/2012 21.0 11/6/2012 189
5/2/2012 20.0 12/18/2012 170
MW-31
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
6/18/2012 21.6 1/22/2013 176
7/9/2012 21.0 2/19/2013 174
8/6/2012 21.0 3/19/2013 168
9/18/2012 21.0 4/16/2013 171
10/22/2012 18.0 5/13/2013 169
11/6/2012 23.6 6/24/2013 179
12/18/2012 22.2 7/9/2013 182
1/22/2013 22.8 8/19/2013 183
2/19/2013 19.3 9/17/2013 193
3/19/2013 19.1 10/23/2013 188
4/16/2013 18.8 11/18/2013 174
5/13/2013 23.8 12/17/2013 203
6/24/2013 20.0 1/7/2014 194
7/9/2013 21.7 2/17/2014 197
8/19/2013 16.0 3/10/2014 230
9/17/2013 21.2 4/28/2014 230
10/23/2013 21.2 5/13/2014 200
11/18/2013 23.9 6/2/2014 173
12/17/2013 24.2 7/28/2014 200
1/7/2014 24.0 8/18/2014 210
2/17/2014 20.6 9/3/2014 210
3/10/2014 26.2 10/6/2014 205
4/28/2014 19.1 11/4/2014 204
5/13/2014 23.3 12/9/2014 215
6/2/2014 23.1 1/20/2015 226
7/28/2014 19.0 2/2/2015 211
8/18/2014 15.2 3/3/2015 209
9/3/2014 18.9
10/6/2014 15.9
11/4/2014 20.9
12/9/2014 17.0
1/20/2015 20.9
2/2/2015 18.7
3/3/2015 19.8
Under the groundwater sampling progran, accelerated monitoring for nitrate
began in MW-31 prior to when the accelerated monitoring for chloride began .
This difference accounts for the different number of data points represented
above.
TabK
Concentration Trend Graphs
(mg/L)
0
Feb-08 +----4~--~----+----;-----r----+---~-----r----~--_,
0 01 00
Jul-09
Nov-10
Apr-12
Aug-13
Dec-14 ·
May-16 ~--~~--~----~--~----~----~--~----~----~--~
""C
CD N 0 3 CD -CD ""' ......
z ;:::;:
""' Q) -CD
(")
0 :::s ()
CD :::s -""' Q)
:::::!'.
0 :::s en
0 0
1\)
0 w 0
(mg/L)
01 0
(j)
0 CXl 0 co 0
Feb-08 +-----~----~----~----~-----r-----+-----+-----+----~
Jul-09 -
Nov-10
Apr-12
Aug-13
Dec-14 -
May-16 -~----~----~----~----~----~----~----~----~----~
""C
(I)
N 0
3
(I) -(I)
""' ......
0 :::r
0 :::::!. a. (I)
0 0
::::J
(")
(I)
::::J -""' D)
:::::!'.
0
::::J Ch
0
Feb-08
Jul-09 -
Nov-10
Apr-12
Aug-13
Dec-14 -
May-16
0
1\J
0
c.u
~< ~
~
,..---~~
~
~~
~
~
\ ~
...
-------
~
~
(mg/L)
0
01
~ ~
~
~~
-~
~
l..-----~ ........ ~
)~
~~
0
<0
""C a;·
N 0 3 ! C'D
""" 1\)
z ;::::;:
""" a C'D
0 0 ::::s (')
C'D ::::s -""" D)
!:!'.
0
::::s en
0
Feb-08
Jul-09
Nov-10 '
Apr-12 -
Aug-13 -
Dec-14
May-16
1\)
(mg/L)
......
0) CXl 0 1\)
....
\ . . ~·
~
~
~
'~
I ~~
~ \~
\
...... ......
0) CXl
"'tJ
CD N 0 3 a CD ""' !\)
0 :::r
0 ~. c. CD
0 0 ::I (')
CD ::I -""' D)
!:!'.
0 ::I en
(mg/L)
0
Feb-08 +--------+--------r--------r------~--------+-------_,
0
(J1
1\)
(J1
Jul-09
Nov-10 -
Apr-12
Aug-13
Dec-14
May-16 ~------~--------~------~------~--------~------~
"'C a;·
N 0
3
C1) -C1)
"" w
z
;::::;:
"" D) -C1)
(")
0
:::J
(')
(1)
:::J -"" D) -()'
:::J
t/1
0
Feb-08
Jul-09
Nov-10
Apr-12 -
Aug-13
Dec-14
May-16
1\)
0
' ~ ..
.j:>.
0
~
(J)
0
~ ~ ~
~ ~ > ~
~~
\
~ ~~
~
(mg/L)
(X)
0
......
0 0
'
1\)
0
"tt
(I)
N 0 3 a (I)
""t
(,)
0 '::r
0 :::::!. a.
(I)
0 0 ::::s ()
(I)
::::s -""t D) e. 0 ::::s C/1
0
Feb-08
Jul-09 -
Nov-10
Apr-12
Aug-13
Dec-14
May-16
0 <:n
~/ /
~~~·
"' ~
~
~ . ~
\~
~~
~
(mg/L)
0
(X)
< ~ ~ ~ ~
-(
r ~
!r
D.
~ z I ......
(mg/L)
...... ......
0
1\)
0
1\)
01
(.0
0
(.0
01 01 01 0
Feb-08 +-------~----~-------+------~------+-------~----~
Jul-09 -
Nov-10 -
Apr-12
Aug-13 -
Dec-14 ,
~ z I ...A.
(")
::::r
0 ""' a:
(I)
(")
0 ::::J
(')
(I)
::::J -""' ~ -s·
::::J Ch
(mg/L)
1\)
0
0)
0 0
Feb-08 -r--------r--------~------~------_,--------+--------1
())
0 0 0
1\)
0
Jul-09 -
Nov-10
Apr-12
Aug-13
Dec-14
May-16 ~------~------~------~~------~------~------~
---4 :e z I N z :::::;:
""'' D) -(I)
(")
0
::::J
(")
(I)
::::J -""'' D) -s·
::::J
t/1
(mg/L)
1\)
0 0> 0 CX> 0 0 0 0
Feb-08 +--------+--------r--------r------~~------;-------~
1\)
0
Jul-09
Nov-10
Apr-12
Aug-13
Dec-14
--4 ::e z I N
0 :::r
0 ..,
0: CD
0 0
::::s (')
CD ::::s -..,
D) -c;·
::::s en
(mg/L)
0
1\)
01 w 0 01 0
Feb-08 +-------r-----_,-------+------~------+-------~-----4
01 w 01
Jul-09 -
Nov-10
Apr-12
Aug-13 ·
Dec-14
May-16 ~------~----~------~------~------~----~------~
-1 ::E z I w
z
;::j.'
""" Q) ..... (1)
0 0
::::::1 n (1)
::::::1 .....
""" Q) ..... (5'
::::::1 en
0
Feb-08
Jul-09 -
Nov-10 .
Apr-12
Aug-13 '
Dec-14
May-16
1\)
0 0> 0
(X)
0
(mg/L)
~
~
0 0
~
1\)
0
......
0> 0
!,>
~
~
).
~
......
(X)
0
1\)
0 0
--4 ::e z I (.,)
(')
':r
0 :::::!. a.
C'D
(')
0
::::s n
C'D
::::s r+ ""' D) r+ cs·
::::s en
0 9 01
(mg/L)
1\)
1\)
01
Feb-08 +----------r--------~----------~--------,_ ________ _,
Jul-09
Nov-10
Apr-12
Aug-13 -
Dec-14
May-16 ~--------~--------~----------~--------~--------~
~ z I ol:lo z ::::. ""' I» -(I)
0 0
:::1 " (I)
:::1 -""' I» e. 0 :::1 (/1
0 0'1 0
(mg/L)
1\)
0
1\)
0'1 c.u 0'1
Feb-08 +-----~-----4------+-----~----~------+-----~-----4
Jul-09 •
Nov-10 -
Apr-12
Aug-13 -
Dec-14
May-16 ~-----L----~------~----~----~------~----~-----4
-4 =E z
I ~
0 ::::r
0
'"'I c:
CD
0 0 :::J (")
CD :::J -'"'I D) -c;·
:::J "'
(mg/L)
0 1\)
1\)
01
Jul-09 +------+------1------1--------+--------:
Nov-10
Apr-12
Aug-13
Dec-14
-f :E z I
"""" z ;:::;:
""''I D) -(I)
(")
0 ~ (')
(I)
~ -""''I D)
!:!'. 0 ~ t/1
0
0 0
1\)
0 0
.j:>.
0 0
<rootL)
0 0
00
0 0
0
0 0
......
1\)
0 0
Feb-08 +--------+--------~-------r------_,--------+-------~
Jul-09
Nov-10
Apr-12 ·
Aug-13 -
Dec-14
May-16 ~------~------~~------~------~--------~------~
-1 :e z I
""""' (") :::r
0 ~-a. CD
(")
0
::::J
(")
CD
::::J -.,
Q)
:::t. 0
::::J
C/1
p
0 c..n
(mg/L)
1\:)
c..n
Jul-09 -t---------1------+-------if-------+--------l
Nov-10
Apr-12
Aug-13
Dec-14
May-16 ~----~----~-----._ _____ ~--------~
-4 :e z I ....
()C)
z :::;:
""'' D) -(I)
0 0
:::::5 (')
(I)
:::::5 -""'' D) -(5"
:::::5 Ul
0 0
1\)
0 w 0
(mg/L)
(11
0
0)
0 CXl 0 c.o 0
Jul-09 +---+---+---+---+----"1-----1----+---+----l
Nov-10-
Apr-12
Aug-13 -
Dec-14 -
May-16 ~--~--~--~-~~---"--~--~--~--~
~ z
I ...... co
(")
:::r
0 ~. c.
CD
(")
0 ::::s (')
CD ::::s r+ "" ! (5'
::::s Ul
0
0 0
7/1/2002
11/1/2002
3/1/2003
7/1/2003 -
11/1/2003
3/1/2004
7/1/2004
11/1/2004
3/1/2005
7/1/2005
11/1/2005 -
3/1/2006 -
7/1/2006
11/1/2006
3/1/2007
7/1/2007
11/1/2007
3/1/2008
7/1/2008
11/1/2008 .
3/1/2009
7/1/2009
11/1/2009
3/1/2010
7/1/2010
11/1/2010
3/1/2011
7/1/2011
11/1/2011
3/1/2012
7/1/2012
11/1/2012
3/1/2013
7/1/2013
11/1/2013
3/1/2014
7/1/2014
11/1/2014
3/1/2015 -
......
0
0 0
N 0
0 0
w 0
0 0
~ 0 0
VI 0
0 0
"' 0
0 0
-...J 0
0 0
-· r+ ... QJ r+
tD
n
0
::::::s n tD
::::::s r+ ... QJ r+ -· 0
::::::s
(f)
0
12/1/2005
3/1/2006
6/1/2006
9/1/2006
12/1/2006
3/1/2007
6/1/2007
9/1/2007
12/1/2007
3/1/2008
6/1/2008
9/1/2008
12/1/2008 -
3/1/2009
6/1/2009
9/1/2009
12/1/2009
3/1/2010
6/1/2010
9/1/2010
12/1/2010
3/1/2011
6/1/2011 -
9/1/2011
12/1/2011
3/1/2012
6/1/2012
9/1/2012
12/1/2012 -
3/1/2013
6/1/2013
9/1/2013
12/1/2013
3/1/2014
6/1/2014
9/1/2014
12/1/2014
3/1/2015
lJ1 0
...... 0 0
...... lJ1 0
N 0 0
N
lJ1 0
~ ~ ~ I
1-' ~
n ::r -0
""' -· c.
t1)
n
0 :::s n
t1) :::s r+
""' QJ r+ -· 0 :::s
V)
9 0
N
0
0'1 0
.....,
0 0
.....,
N
0
51112005 r--r--r--r-lr--l==~::::;~----l
8/1/2005
11/1/2005 ~
2/1/2006 .
5/1/2006 -
8/1/2006
11/1/2006
2/1/2007
5/1/2007
8/1/2007
11/1/2007
2/1/2008
5/1/2008 .
8/1/2008
11/1/2008 -
2/1/2009 -
5/1/2009
8/1/2009
11/1/2009
2/1/2010
5/1/2010
8/1/2010
11/1/2010
2/1/2011 -
5/1/2011 '
8/1/2011
11/1/2011
2/1/2012
5/1/2012
8/1/2012
11/1/2012 ~
2/1/2013 .
5/1/2013
8/1/2013
11/1/2013
2/1/2014
5/1/2014
8/1/2014
11/1/2014
2/1/2015
~ ~
I
N .....
z ;::;.·
Ql .....
tD
n
0 ::s n tD ::s .....
Ql ..... -· 0 ::s
"'
0
12/1/2005
3/1/2006 .
6/1/2006 ~
9/1/2006 .
12/1/2006
3/1/2007
6/1/2007
9/1/2007
12/1/2007
3/1/2008 .
6/1/2008
9/1/2008
12/1/2008
3/1/2009 -
6/1/2009 .
9/1/2009 -
12/1/2009
3/1/2010
6/1/2010
9/1/2010
12/1/2010 .
3/1/2011
6/1/2011 -
9/1/2011
12/1/2011
3/1/2012 .
6/1/2012
9/1/2012 .
12/1/2012
3/1/2013
6/1/2013
9/1/2013
12/1/2013
3/1/2014
6/1/2014 -
9/1/2014
12/1/2014
3/1/2015
U'1 0
...... 0 0
N 0 0
N U'1
0
w 0 0
w
U'1 0
.j::.
0 0
~ ~ ~ I N ...,a.
n ::r -0
""' -· c.
tD
n 0
::::s n
tD
::::s r+ ""' Q,)
r+ -· 0
::::s
"'
2/28/2007
6/27/2007
8/15/2007
10/10/2007
3/26/2008
6/25/2008
9/10/2008
10/15/2008
3/11/2009
6/24/2009
9/15/2009
12/29/2009
3/3/2010
6/15/2010
8/12/2010
8/24/2010
10/13/2010
2/23/2011
6/1/2011
8/17/2011
11/16/2011
1/19/2012
6/13/2012
9/12/2012
10/4/2012
2/11/2013
6/5/2013
9/3/2013
10/29/2013
1/27/2014
5/19/2014
8/11/2014
10/21/2014
3/9/2015
0 ...... 0 N 0 w 0
mg/L
~ 0 U'l 0 O'l 0 00 0
-1 ~ ::. I N
N
z -· ..... ..,
C) ..... tt>
n 0 ::s n tt> ::s ..... ..,
C) ..... -· 0 ::s
U)
2/28/2007
6/27/2007
8/15/2007
10/10/2007
3/26/2008
6/25/2008
9/10/2008
10/15/2008
3/11/2009
6/24/2009
9/15/2009
12/29/2009
3/3/2010
6/15/2010
8/12/2010
8/24/2010
10/13/2010
2/23/2011
6/1/2011
8/17/2011
11/16/2011
1/19/2012
6/13/2012
9/12/2012
10/4/2012
2/11/2013
6/5/2013
9/3/2013
10/29/2013
1/27/2014
5/19/2014
8/11/2014
10/21/2014
3/9/2015
0
1-' 0 0
N 0 0
w 0 0
mg/L
~ 0 0
VI 0 0
0"1 0 0
......,
0 0
00 0 0
~ .a::. I
N N
n :r -0 ., -· c..
tD
n
0
::::s n
tD
::::s r+
Ol r+ -· 0
::::s en
.... 0
....
V1 N 0
mg/L
N V1 w 0
w
V1 V1 0
-1 ~ ~ I
N ~
2 ;:;: ..,
OJ ,...
tD n
0 ::::s n tD ::::s ,... ..,
OJ ,... -· 0
::::s
"'
6/27/2007
8/15/2007
10/10/2007
3/26/2008
6/25/2008
9/10/2008
10/15/2008
3/4/2009
6/24/2009
9/15/2009
12/17/2009
2/25/2010
6/9/2010
8/11/2010
8/24/2010
10/6/2010
2/17/2011
5/26/2011
8/17/2011
11/16/2011
1/18/2012
6/6/2012
8/30/2012
10/3/2012
2/11/2013
6/5/2013
9/3/2013
10/29/2013
1/27/2014
5/19/2014
8/11/2014
10/21/2014
3/9/2015
N 0 0 0
.j:>.
0 0
en 0 0
mg/L
00 0 0
I-" 0 0 0
I-" N
0 0
~ ~ I N ~
n :::r -0
""' -· c..
tD
n 0 ::s n tD ::s r+ ""' QJ r+ -· 0 ::s
(I'
mg/L
I-' U1 N 0 N U1
~ ~ I N
U1
z -· ,... ..,
QJ ,...
tD
n 0
:::::s n tD
:::::s ,...
@ ,... -· 0
:::::s
"'
0 (./1 0
1-' 0 0
1-' (./1
0
N 0 0
mg/L
N (./1
0
w
0 0
w
(./1
0
.j::>
0 0
.j::>
(./1
0
-4 ~ ~ I
N
U1
n :::r -0
""' -· Q.
n>
n
0 :::s n n> :::s r+ ""' QJ r+ -· 0 :::s
"'
6/1/2005
9/1/2005
0 0
12/1/2005
3/1/2006 .
6/1/2006 .
9/1/2006 -
12/1/2006 .
3/1/2007 .
6/1/2007 .
9/1/2007
12/1/2007
3/1/2008
6/1/2008
9/1/2008
12/1/2008
3/1/2009
6/1/2009
9/1/2009
12/1/2009
3/1/2010
6/1/2010
9/1/2010
12/1/2010
3/1/2011
6/1/2011
9/1/2011
12/1/2011
3/1/2012
6/1/2012 .
9/1/2012
12/1/2012
3/1/2013
6/1/2013
9/1/2013
12/1/2013
3/1/2014
6/1/2014
9/1/2014 .
12/1/2014
3/1/2015 .
U"1
0
I-' 0
0
N 0
0
N U"1
0
s
:E I CJJ 0
2 ;::;:
Dl ,..
tD
n 0
::::s n
tD
::::s ,..
Dl ,.. -· 0
::::s (/)
0
6/1/2005
9/1/2005
12/1/2005
3/1/2006
6/1/2006
9/1/2006
12/1/2006
3/1/2007
6/1/2007
9/1/2007
12/1/2007
3/1/2008
6/1/2008
9/1/2008
12/1/2008
3/1/2009
6/1/2009
9/1/2009
12/1/2009
3/1/2010
6/1/2010
9/1/2010
12/1/2010
3/1/2011 -
6/1/2011
9/1/2011 -
12/1/2011
3/1/2012
6/1/2012 .
9/1/2012
12/1/2012
3/1/2013
6/1/2013
9/1/2013
12/1/2013
3/1/2014
6/1/2014
9/1/2014
12/1/2014
3/1/2015
N
0 en 0 00 0
1-' 0 0
1-' N
0
1-' .j:>.
0
1-' en 0
1-' 00
0
s:
~ I w 0
n
';j' -0
""'' -· c. n>
n
0
::J n n>
::J r+
QJ
r+ -· 0
::J
"'
0
0
6/1/2005
9/1/2005
12/1/2005
3/1/2006 -
6/1/2006
9/1/2006
12/1/2006
3/1/2007 .
6/1/2007
9/1/2007 .
12/1/2007 .
3/1/2008 .
6/1/2008 .
9/1/2008
12/1/2008
3/1/2009
6/1/2009
9/1/2009
12/1/2009
3/1/2010
6/1/2010
9/1/2010
12/1/2010
3/1/2011
6/1/2011
9/1/2011
12/1/2011
3/1/2012
6/1/2012
9/1/2012
12/1/2012
3/1/2013
6/1/2013
9/1/2013
12/1/2013
3/1/2014
6/1/2014
9/1/2014
12/1/2014
3/1/2015
VI
0
.....
0
0
.....
VI
0
N 9 0
N VI
0
UJ 0
0
UJ VI
0
s:
~ I
UJ .....
z ;::;
Ql r+ tD
n 0
::l n tD
::l r+
Ql r+ -· 0
::l
"'
0
6/1/2005
9/1/2005
12/1/2005 -
3/1/2006
6/1/2006
9/1/2006
12/1/2006
3/1/2007
6/1/2007
9/1/2007
12/1/2007
3/1/2008
6/1/2008
9/1/2008
12/1/2008
3/1/2009
6/1/2009
9/1/2009
12/1/2009
3/1/2010 -
6/1/2010
9/1/2010
12/1/2010
3/1/2011
6/1/2011
9/1/2011
12/1/2011
3/1/2012
6/1/2012
9/1/2012
12/1/2012 -
3/1/2013
6/1/2013 .
9/1/2013
12/1/2013
3/1/2014 -
6/1/2014 .
9/1/2014
12/1/2014
3/1/2015
V1
0
.......
0 0
.......
V1
0
N 0 0
N V1
0
s
:E
I w
~
n :::r -0 .., -· c.
CD
n 0
::::J n
CD
::::J r+ ..,
QJ r+ -· 0
::::J
"'
TabL
CSV Transmittal Letter
Kathy Weinel
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Kathy Weinel
Wednesday, May 20, 2015 7:33AM
Rusty Lundberg ([e-mail])
'Phil Goble'; 'Dean Henderson'; Harold Roberts; David Frydenlund; Scott Bakken; David
Turk; Jaime Massey; Dan Hillsten; Logan Shumway
Transmittal of CSV Files White Mesa Mill 2015 Q1 Nitrate Monitoring
1502347-EDD.csv
Attached to this e-mail is an electronic copy of laboratory results for nitrate monitoring conducted at the White Mesa
Mill during the first quarter of 2015, in Comma Separated Value (CSV) format.
Please contact me at 303-389-4134 if you have any questions on this transmittal.
Yours Truly
Kathy Weinel
Jl,£ Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
Kathy Weinel
Quality Assurance Manager
t: 303.389.4134 1 t: 303.389.4125
225 Union Blvd., Suite 600
Lakewood, CO 80228
http://www.energvtuels.com
This e-mail is intended for the exclusive use of person(s) mentioned as the recipient(s). This message and any attached files with it are confidential and may
contain privileged or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient(s) please delete this message and notify the sender. You may not use, distribute
print or copy this message if you are not the intended recipient(s).
1
Tab M Residual Mass Estimate Analysis Figures and Tables
Tab M -Figures
Tab M -Tables
g
$
Ill E ·;; w
Ill Ill Ill :5
Gl E :::J ii:
~ -z
45000~------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~
40000 1 ....._....... , \ / \ 7 \ I
,__ / I \ L \ --.... ....._
350001 \7 ---
--------
30000 T-----------------------------------------------------------------~~------------~------------------~
25000 1-----------------------------------------------------------------------~Jf----------------------l
y = -1043.5x + 41394
20000 +.--------~---------r---------r--------~--------~--------~--------~--------r---------~------~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
-N~rate Plume Mass Estimates HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
Time Series of Nitrate Plume Mass Estimates
--Linear (Nitrate Plume Mass Estimates) Approved ,Fjguro
M.1
H:\718000\may15\nitrate\masscalc\Nmtrend0315: Bx11 LS Color