DRC-2015-001364 - 0901a068804f34b1

1
ENERGYFUELS
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Blvd. Suite 600
Lakewood, CO, US, 80228
303 974 2140
www.cnergyfuels.com
DRC-2015-001364
February 9, 2015
VIA PDF AND FEDERAL EXPRESS
Mr. Rusty Lundberg
Director of the Utah Division of Radiation Control
State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144850
Salt Lake City, UT 84116-4850
Re: State of Utah Ground Water Discharge Permit No. UGW370004
White Mesa Uranium Mill - Removal of Certain Groundwater Monitoring Parameters
from Accelerated Monitoring Status
Dear Mr. Lundberg:
A number of groundwater monitoring constituents have been placed on accelerated monitoring status
under Part I.G.I of the Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. ("EFRI") Ground Water Discharge Permit No.
UGW370004 ("GWDP"). Part I.G.I provides that such accelerated monitoring shall continue until
compliance status of the facility can be determined by the Director.
Based on the accelerated monitoring results to date, EFRI requests the Director make a determination that
accelerated monitoring cease at this time for carbon tetrachloride in MW-26, field pH in MW-31,
manganese in MW-01 and gross alpha in MW-19, for the reasons stated below:
• MW-26 carbon tetra chloride results have been below the Groundwater Compliance Limit
("GWCL") specified in the GWDP for eight consecutive sampling events since Ql 2014. Per
the UDEQ, eight consecutive sample results below the GWCL are needed for the discontinuance
of accelerated monitoring.
• MW-31 field pH results have been below the GWCL specified in the GWDP for ten consecutive
sampling events since the February 2014 sampling event. Per the UDEQ, eight consecutive
sample results below the GWCL are needed for the discontinuance of accelerated monitoring.
• MW-1 manganese results have been below the GWCL specified in the GWDP for eight
consecutive sampling events since Q4 2012. Per the UDEQ, eight consecutive sample results
below the GWCL are needed for the discontinuance of accelerated monitoring.
• MW-19 gross alpha results have been below the GWCL specified in the GWDP for eight
consecutive sampling events since Q4 2012. Per the UDEQ, eight consecutive sample results
below the GWCL are needed for the discontinuance of accelerated monitoring.
Once removed from accelerated monitoring status, these constituents, like all other constituents, would be
subject to future accelerated monitoring under Part I.G.I of the GWDP, should circumstances warrant.
Letter to Rusty Lundberg
Removal of Parameters from Accelerated Monitoring
February 9, 2015
Page 2
Field pH measurements will continue to be recorded for all samples collected, including any accelerated
monitoring completed for other constituents as required. Upon DRC approval of this request, field pH
measurements will no longer be tracked and reported as part of the quarterly Exceedance Notice, but will
return to the routine reporting in the Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Reports.
To assist in your evaluation of the foregoing, we have included a summary of the accelerated sampling
results since the initial sample result that triggered accelerated monitoring in Table 1.
The analytical laboratory reports for the foregoing results up to and including September 2014 are
included in the Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Reports, all of which have been provided to DRC.
Copies of the analytical laboratory reports and the field sheets for the results for October 2014 through
December 2014 will be provided in the upcoming 4th Quarter 2014 Groundwater Monitoring Report and
are also included with this letter for your convenience. It is important to note that the 4th Quarter 2014
monitoring results included with this letter have been evaluated per the DRC approved QAP and the
GWDP and all field and laboratory quality control parameters are acceptable. The evaluations of the 4th
Quarter data will be included in the 4th Quarter 2014 Groundwater Monitoring Report, due March 1,
If you have any questions or require any further information, please contact the undersigned.
Kathy Weinel
Quality Assurance Manager
cc: David C. Frydenlund
Harold Roberts
Dan Hillsten
David Turk
Scott Bakken
2015.
Yours trul,
ENfftGYFlMLS
Analytical Results and Field Sampling Sheets for the Wells that are the Subject of
this Request
Table 1
Summary of Accelerated Sample Results with Eight or More Results in Compliance
Well ID Constituent GWCL Sample Date Sample Result
MW-26 Carbon
Tetrachloride
(ug/L)
5.0 Ql 2014*
May 2014
Q2 2014
July 2014
August 2014
Q3 2014
October 2014
Q4 2014
December 2014
6.86
< 1.0
< 1.0
< 1.0
< 1.0
< 1.0
< 1.0
< 1.0
< 1.0
MW-31 Field pH (S.U.) 6.50 February 2014"
Ql 2014
April 2014
May 2014
Q2 2014
July 2014
August 2014
Q3 2014
October 2014
Q4 2014
December 2014
6.45
6.53
7.45
6.83
8.23
61
7.60
6.94
6.97
6.69
6.73
MW-1 Manganese
(ug/L)
289 04 2012"
Ql 2013
Q2 2013
Q3 2013
Q4 2013
Ql 2014
Q2 2014
Q3 2014
Q4 2014
315
173
127
83.9
113
76.8
82.3
80.0
59.2
MW-19 Gross Alpha 2.36 Q4 20I2H
Ql 2013
Q2 2013
Q3 2013
Q4 2013
Ql 2014
Q22014
Q3 2014
Q4 2014
4.86
1.11
1.19
< 1.0
< 1.0
< 1.0
2.24
< 1.0
< 1.0
KLast sample result outside of GWCL limits.
American West
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City. UT 84119
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: October Monthly GW 2014
LabSamplelD: 1410137-003D
Client Sample ID: MW-26 10072014
Collection Date: 10/7/2014 1230h
Received Date: 10/10/2014 1030h
Analytical Results
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Test Code: 8260-W
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
Analyzed: 10/13/2014 1522h
Units: ug/L
Compound
Chloroform
Dilution Factor: 20 Method: SW8260C
CAS
Number
Reporting
Limit
Analytical
Result
67-66-3 20.0 894
Qual
Phone:[phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax:[phone]
e-mail: awal'a avval-labs.com
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Surrogate CAS Result Amount Spiked % REC Limits
Surr: l,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
17060-07-0
460-00-4
1868-53-7
2037-26-5
1,080
1,040
1,030
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
108
104
103
100
72-151
80-128
80-124
77-129
The reporting limits were raised due to high analyte concentrations.
Analyzed: 10/13/2014 1443h
Units: ug/L Dilution Factor: 1 Method: SW8260C
Compound
CAS
Number
Reporting
Limit
Carbon tetrachloride
Methylene chloride
56-23-5
75-09-2
1.00
1.00
< 1.00
3.78
Surrogate CAS Result Amount Spiked % REC Limits
Surr: l,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
17060-07-0
460-00-4
1868-53-7
2037-26-5
51.6
50.7
50.1
49.3
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
103
101
100
98.6
72-151
80-128
80-124
77-129
Qual
Analytical
Result Qual
Qual
Report Date: 11 /5/2014 Page 16 of 31
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance lo NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information if. located on the attached COC. Confidential Business information: This repon is provided for the exclusive use of Ihe
addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of (be name of this company or any member of ils staff, or reproduction of this report in connection wilh the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, nr in connection uirh the re-publication of this report
for any purpose other thdn for die addressee »d) be granted only on contact, Thi-. company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/of analysts in good faith and according lit the rules ofthe trade and of science.
American West
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: awal&awal-labs.com
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 4th Quarter Groundwater 2014
LabSamplelD: 1411349-008A
Client Sample ID: MW-26 11182014
Collection Date: 11/18/2014 1510h
Received Date: 11/21/2014 1300h
Analvtical Results
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Test Code: 8260-W
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
Analyzed: 11/25/2014 1239h
Units: ug/L Dilution Factor: 50 Method: SW8260C
Compound
CAS
Number
Reporting
Limit
Analytical
Result
Chloroform 67-66-3 50.0 1,520
Surrogate CAS Result Amount Spiked % REC Limits
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
SUIT: Toluene-d8
17060-07-0
460-00-4
1868-53-7
2037-26-5
2,740
2,500
2,550
2,350
2,500
2,500
2,500
2,500
1 10
100
102
93.8
72-151
80-128
80-124
77-129
The reporting limits were raised due to high analyte concentrations.
Analyzed: 11/21/2014 1653h
Units: ug/L Dilution Factor: 1 Method: SW8260C
Compound
CAS
Number
Reporting
Limit
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
78-93-3
67-64-1
71-43-2
56-23-5
74- 87-3
75- 09-2
91-20-3
109-99-9
108-88-3
1330-20-7
20.0
20.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
7.34
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Surrogate CAS Result Amount Spiked % REC Limits
Surr: l,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
17060-07-0
460-00-4
1868-53-7
2037-26-5
56.0
55.0
53.6
52.3
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
1 12
1 10
107
105
72-151
80-128
80-124
77-129
Qual
Qual
Analytical
Result Qual
Qual
Report Date: 12/28/2014 Page 33 of 51
All analyses applicable lo the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling iafonnation is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This repon is provided for the exclusive use of the
addressee. Privileges of subsequent use ofthe name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of ihis repon JU connection «/<th the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this repon
for any purpose other than for the addressee will be gianled only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for ths due performance of inspection and ur analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
American West
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: awal((iawal-labs.com
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: December Monthly GW 2014 Re Sample
LabSamplelD: 1412317-001A
Client Sample ID: MW-26 12152014
Collection Date: 12/15/2014 lOOOh
Received Date: 12/16/2014 1020h
Analytical Results
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Test Code: 8260-W
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
Analyzed: 12/16/2014 1706h
Units: ug/L Dilution Factor: 100 Method: SW8260C
Compound
CAS
Number
Reporting
Limit
Analytical
Result Qual
Chloroform 67-66-3 100 2,280
Surrogate CAS Result Amount Spiked % REC Limits
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
17060-07-0
460-00-4
1868-53-7
2037-26-5
4,830
4,910
4,840
4,700
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
96.7
98.1
96.9
93.9
72-151
80-128
80-124
77-129
The reporting limits were raised due to high analyte concentrations.
Analyzed: 12/16/2014 1548h
Units: ug/L Dilution Factor: 1 Method: SW8260C
Compound
CAS
Number
Reporting
Limit
Analytical
Result
Carbon tetrachloride
Methylene chloride
56-23-5
75-09-2
1.00
1.00
< 1.00
28.4
Surrogate CAS Result Amount Spiked % REC Limits
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
17060-07-0
460-00-4
1868-53-7
2037-26-5
49.2
48.3
49.0
46.8
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
98.4
96.7
97.9
93.7
72-151
80-128
80-124
77-129
Qual
Qual
Qual
Report Date: 12/29/2014 Page 4 of 10
Al! analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance lo NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of ihe
addressee. Privileges of subsequent u>e of the name of litis company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or :n connection with [he re-publ icalion of this report
for any purpose oilier lhan for the addressee will be granted oniy on contact. This company accepts no responsibtlitv except for the due performance of inspection and or analysis in good faith and according to the rules !»f the trade and of science
Mill - Groundwater Discharge Permit
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2 - Errata
See instruction
Description of Sampling Event: October 2.614 (XCQWAA b^oA'e/'
Sampler Name
Location (well name): | A^U)~3l and initials:
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging
Well Purging Equip Used: pump or • bailer
Purging Method Used: 112 \2 casings • 3 casings
Sampling Event OcVob-tir Q-u3
pH Buffer 7.0 "7.0
and Sampling (if different)
Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event
pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance \00O U.MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I3O.60
Depth to Water Before Purging f3%."Z.g Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:
3" Well: o
(.653h)
(.367h)
Weather Cond.
Time
Conductance
Temp. °C
Gal. Purged [
pH
TSrSTT
Redox Potential Eh (mV)
Turbidity (NTU) 35"
Time
Conductance
Temp. °C
Gal. Purged | gTg
pH j 1,17
Redox Potential Eh (mV)
Turbidity (NTU) •3T
Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event) )0°
Time
Conductance
Temp. °C
Gal. Purged [ fOTFj
pH
Redox Potential Eh (mV)
Turbidity (NTU)
-Z&£-
-yr
Time
Conductance
Temp. °C
Gal. Purged Tf737~
rST75
Redox Potential Eh (mV) [~2TT
Turbidity (NTU) "32"
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill - Groundwater Discharge Permit
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2 - Errata
Volume of Water Purged %1.^T7 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 =
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = 1 3~7l-43
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs
Type of Sample Sample Taken
Y N
Sample Vol (indicate
if other than as
specified below)
Filtered
N
Preservative Type Preservative Added
N
VOCs • 3x40 ml HCL •
Nutrients • • 100 ml • H2S04
12" Heavy Metals 250 ml HN03 •
All Other Non Radiologics • • 250 ml • • No Preserv. •
Gross Alpha 1,000 ml HN03 • •
Other (specify) Sample volume Q • 0
^5
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth [ 10-^ Sample Time 1300
See instruction
Comment
MW-31 10-06-2014 Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill - Groundwater Discharge Permit
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2 - Errata
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: | H^u Qo,.rVf.r C^^ek \^>^\r.r 7.r>\^
Sampler Name
Location (well name): and initials:
Field Sample ID ^IQ-^st .tlOul7QIH
Date and Time for Purging
Well Purging Equip Used: S pump or | • | bailer
Purging Method Used: 2 casings | • |3 casings
Sampling Event
pH Buffer 7.0
and Sampling (if different)
Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event
pH Buffer 4.0
A/A
A/A
Specific Conductance uMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purging | ,4% _ MrO
Well Depth(O.Olft):
Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:
3" Well: J2_
(.653h)
(.367h)
Weather Cond. 5
Time
Conductance
Temp. °C
Gal. Purged
pH
Redox Potential Eh (mV)
Turbidity (NTU) H.2.
Time
Conductance
Temp. °C
135°! Gal. Purged
2 \ \5 pH
Redox Potential Eh (mV)
Turbidity (NTU)
Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)| -2,
Time 135& Gal. Purged %Q.
Conductance
Temp. °C
PHI A_Aq
IH./?g
Redox Potential Eh (mV)
Turbidity (NTU) MA
Time
Conductance
Temp. °C
Gal. Purged ) gl,37
PHI f^S
Redox Potential Eh (mV)
Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill - Groundwater Discharge Permit
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2 - Errata
Volume of Water Purged | 1 „ 3"7
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 =
gallon(s)
.7)1
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q =
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs [ u>.A L ^ b^l—
Type of Sample Sample Taken
N
Sample Vol (indicate
if other than as
specified below)
Filtered
N
Preservative Type Preservative Added
N
VOCs 0 • 3x40 ml • HCL •
Nutrients • 100 ml • H2S04 0
Heavy Metals • 250 ml 0 • HN03 •
All Other Non Radiologics 0 • 250 ml • No Preserv. • 0
Gross Alpha S • 1,000 ml • HN03 13
Other (specify) 0 • Sample volume • •
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth | 11.16 Sample Time 1MQ6
See instruction
Comment
LOc-ttr- L_> C \c*.r- ol^ri^ ^ur^e., F^V^C C^AtA <5-^A £ c^^^f If-i U-JC-f-C-
MW-31 11-04-2014 Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill - Groundwater Discharge Permit
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2 - Errata
See instruction
Description of Sampling Event: v December /MO>TW.H &rowA lO^cr zo)4
^ Sampler Name
Location (well name): /MVJ~3>1 and initials: -fanner floJjii^/T?/
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging lZ/yZoH
Well Purging Equip Used: Ll pump or | • | bailer
Purging Method Used: | tl |2 casings | • |3 casings
Sampling Event MdnfolU 6-vJ
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0
and Sampling (if different)
Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event
^0 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance 1000 U.MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 HL^
Well Depth(O.Olft):
Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:
3" Well:
I3D.OD
40.H (.653h)
(.367h)
Weather Cond. Clear
Time
Conductance
Temp. °C
Z1T.O
Gal. Purged
pH
14X7
Redox Potential Eh (mV)
Turbidity (NTU)
Time
Conductance
Temp. °C
TTTT
Gal. Purged
PH
^735"
Redox Potential Eh (mV) | 3b>3
Turbidity (NTU)
~£77o~
Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event) 2?
Time Gal. Purged
Conductance
Temp. °C
Zllo pH £775
Redox Potential Eh (mV) | 3i>7
Turbidity (NTU)
Time
Conductance
Temp. °C
not Gal. Purged |
tilt pH
Redox Potential Eh (mV) |
Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill - Groundwater Discharge Permit
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2 - Errata
Volume of Water Purged | %2L}-\L
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60= I 3~7Q.H3 T = 2V/Q= 370 .H3
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs f\\d f\ L
Type of Sample Sample Taken
Y N
Sample Vol (indicate
if other than as
specified below)
Filtered
N
Preservative Type Preservative Added
N
VOCs • • 3x40 ml • •
T3"
HCL • •
Nutrients 100 ml • H2S04
T3" Heavy Metals • 250 ml HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologics • 250 ml • • No Preserv. •
Gross Alpha • • 1,000 ml HN03 •
Other (specify) Sample volume [3
TD/3 If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth | CI.^M, Sample Time
Comment
See instruction
/Wvi\)ef\ or\ MTe <Y 06>3S (r&cco present p"r^<- w4 Sa^iph^ euerrr-
f^ra^. b^/\ <\T OGM0. P^r^e^ -Tor o. -fo^l of 2%0 .
PVAT^ <cno\eo\ CKO(\ rS^rvjpIo Co\)ec
•300, Lc-f? 5/fc «f i304
MW-31 12-09-2014 Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
American West
3440 South 700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Phone:[phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 4th Quarter Groundwater 2014
Lab Sample ID: 1411349-001
Client Sample ID: MW-01 11172014
Collection Date: 11/17/2014 1245h
Received Date: 11/21/2014 1300h
Analytical Results
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Compound
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
DISSOLVED METALS
Units
Date Date Method Reporting
Prepared Analyzed Used Limit
Analytical
Result Qual
mg/L 12/10/2014 1131h 12/12/2014 2127h E200.8 0.00500 < 0.00500
mg/L 12/10/2014 1131h 12/16/2014 1746h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
mg/L 12/10/2014 1131h 12/12/2014 2127h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
mg/L 11/24/2014 1205h 12/2/2014 1059h E200.7 100 200
mg/L 12/10/2014 1131h 12/12/2014 2127h E2O0.8 0.0250 < 0.0250
mg/L 12/10/2014 1131h 12/12/2014 2127h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
mg/L 12/10/2014 1131h 12/12/2014 2127h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
mg/L 12/10/2014 1131h 12/16/2014 1746h E200.8 0.0300 0.184
mg/L 12/10/2014 1131h 12/16/2014 1746h E200.8 0.00100 < 0.00100
mg/L 11/24/2014 1205h 12/2/2014 1214h E200.7 10.0 71.1
mg/L 12/10/2014 1131h 12/12/2014 2127h E200.8 0.0100 0.0592
mg/L 11/25/2014 1250h 11/26/2014 1312h E245.1 0.000500 < 0.000500
mg/L 12/10/2014 1131h 12/12/2014 2127h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
mg/L 12/10/2014 1131h 12/12/2014 2127h E200.8 0.0200 < 0.0200
mg/L 11/24/2014 1205h 12/2/2014 1528h E200.7 1.00 6.40
mg/L 12/10/2014 1131h 12/12/2014 2127h E200.8 0.00500 < 0.00500
mg/L 12/10/2014 1131h 12/12/2014 2127h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
mg/L 11/24/2014 1205h 12/2/2014 1059h E200.7 100 178
mg/L 12/10/2014 1131h 12/16/2014 1746h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
mg/L 12/10/2014 1131h 12/12/2014 2127h E200.8 0.100 < 0.100
mg/L 12/10/2014 1131h 12/16/2014 1938h E200.8 0.000300 0.000399
mg/L 11/24/2014 1205h 12/2/2014 1528h E200.7 0.0150 < 0.0150
mg/L 12/10/2014 1131h 12/12/2014 2127h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
2 - Analyte concentration is too high for accurate matrix spike recovery and/or RPD.
Report Date: 12/28/2014 Page 8 of 51
Al! analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance lo NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the
addressee. Privileges of subsequent use ofthe name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the adverEjseme?!:. pnmw'iion or safe of any product or process, or m connection with the re-publication of this report
for any purpose other than fin ihe addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts oo responsibility except for the due performance of .'risperji^ andiir analysis in good faith and according to the rules ofthe trade and of science
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - [phone] - www.gel com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date December 9, 2014
Company :
Address
Contact.
Project.
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID
Matrix
Collect Date-
Receive Date.
Collector:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms Kathy Weinel
GW Monitoring Project
MW-19J 1112014
361392007
Ground Water
11-NOV-14 15.20
15-NOV-14
Client
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00106
DNMI001
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty MDC RL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
Gross Radium Alpha U 0 682 +/-0 266 0 763 100 pCi/L CXP3 12/07/14 1404 1437763 1
The following Analytical Methods were performed'
Method Description Analyst Comments
1 EPA 900 1 Modified
Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Test Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
Barium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received" 95 0 (25%-125%)
Notes:
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (1-sigma)
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Page 19 of 26