DRC-2014-004946 - 0901a06880481d30

ENERGYFUELS
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Blvd. Suite 600
Lakewood, CO, US, 80228
303 974 2140
www.encrgyfuels.com
August 18, 2014
Sent VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY DRC-2014-004946
Mr. Rusty Lundberg
Division of Radiation Control
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144850
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Re: Transmittal of 2nd Quarter 2014 Nitrate Monitoring Report
Stipulation and Consent Order Docket Number UGW12-04 White Mesa Uranium Mill
Dear Mr. Lundberg:
Enclosed are two copies of the White Mesa Uranium Mill Nitrate Monitoring Report for the 2nd
Quarter of 2014 as required by the Stipulation and Consent Order Docket Number UGW12-04, as well
as two CDs each containing a word searchable electronic copy of the report.
If you should have any questions regarding this report please contact me.
Yours very truly,
ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC.
Kathy Weinel
Quality Assurance Manager
cc: David C. Frydenlund
Dan Hillsten
Harold R. Roberts
David E. Turk
Frank Filas
August 18, 2014
Sent VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
Mr. Rusty Lundberg
Division of Radiation Control
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144850
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Re: Transmittal of 2nd Quarter 2014 Nitrate Monitoring Report
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Blvd. Suite 600
Lakewood, CO, US, 80228
303 974 2140
www .energyfuels.com
Stipulation and Consent Order Docket Number UGW12-04 White Mesa Uranium Mill
Dear Mr. Lundberg:
Enclosed are two copies of the White Mesa Uranium Mill Nitrate Monitoring Report for the 2"d
Quarter of 2014 as required by the Stipulation and Consent Order Docket Number UGW12-04, as well
as two CDs each containing a word searchable electronic copy of the report.
If you should have any questions regarding this report please contact me.
Yours very truly,
ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC.
Kathy Weinel
Quality Assurance Manager
cc: David C. Frydenlund
Dan Hillsten
Harold R. Roberts
David E. Turk
Frank Filas
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Nitrate Monitoring Report
State of Utah
Stipulated Consent Agreement, January 2009
Docket No. UGW09-03
2nd Quarter
(April through June)
2014
Prepared by:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Boulevard, Suite 600
Lakewood, CO 80228
August 18, 2014
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1
2.0 GROUNDWATER NITRATE MONITORING ................................................ l
2.1 Samples and Measurements Taken During the Quarter ..................................... 1
2.1.1 Nitrate Monitoring ...................................................................................... 2
2.1.2 Parameters Analyzed ................................................................................... 3
2.1.3 Groundwater Head and Level Monitoring .................................................. 3
2.2 Sampling Methodology and Equipment and Decontamination Procedures ....... 3
2.2.1 Well Purging, Sampling and Depth to Groundwater .................................. 4
2.2.2 Piezometer Sampling .................................................................................. 5
2.3 Field Data ............................................................................................................ 5
2.4 Depth to Groundwater Data and Water Table Contour Map .............................. 5
2.5 Laboratory Results ........................................................................................... ., .. 5
2.5.1 Copy of Laboratory Results ........................................................................ 5
2.5.2 Regulatory Framework ............................................................................... 5
3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND DATA VALIDATION ................................... 6
3.1 Field QC Samples ............................................................................................... 6
3.2 Adherence to Mill Sampling SOPs ..................................................................... 6
3.3 Analyte Completeness Review ............................................................................ 7
3.4 Data Validation ................................................................................................... 7
3.4.1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation .................................................................... 7
3.4.2 Holding Time Evaluation ............................................................................ 8
3.4.3 Analytical Method Checklist ...................................................................... 8
3.4.4 Reporting Limit Evaluation ...................................................... , .................. 8
3.4.5 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates ................................................. 9
3.4.6 Other Laboratory QA/QC ........................................................................... 9
3.4.7 Receipt Temperature Evaluation ............................................................... 10
3.4.8 Rinsate Check ........................................................................................... 10
4.0 INTERPRETATION OF DATA ....................................................................... 10
4.1 Interpretation of Groundwater Levels, Gradients and Flow Directions ........... 10
4.1.1 Current Site Groundwater Contour Map ................................................... 10
4.1.2 Comparison of Current Groundwater Contour Map to Groundwater Contour Map
for Previous Quarter .................................................................................. 13
4.1.3 Hydrographs .............................................................................................. 14
4.1.4 Depth to Groundwater Measured and Groundwater Elevation ................. 15
4.2 Effectiveness of Hydraulic Containment and Capture ...................................... 15
4.2.1 Hydraulic Containment and Control.. ....................................................... 15
4.2.2 Current Nitrate and Chloride Isoconcentration Maps ............................... 18
4.2.3 Comparison of Areal Extent ............. , .............................................................. 18
4.2.4 Nitrate and Chloride Concentration Trend Data and Graphs .................... 19
4.2.5 Interpretation of Analytical Data .............................................................. 19
4.3 Estimation of Pumped Nitrate Mass and Residual Nitrate Mass within the Plume
.......................................................................................................................... 21
5.0 LONG TERM PUMP TEST AT TWN-02, TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-25
OPERATIONS REPORT .................................................................................. 22
5.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 22
5.2 Pumping Well Data Collection ......................................................................... 22
5.3 Water Level Measurements .............................................................................. 23
5.4 Pumping Rates and Volumes ........... , ................................................................ 23
6.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT ................................................................. 24
6.1 Assessment of Previous Quarter's Corrective Actions ..................................... 24
7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................ 24
8.0 ELECTRONIC DATA FILES AND FORMAT .............................................. 27
9.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION ........................................................... 28
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Table 5
Table 6
Table 7
Table 8
LIST OF TABLES
Summary of Well Sampling and Constituents for the Period
Nitrate Mass Removal Per Well Per Quarter
Nitrate Well Pumping Rates and Volumes
Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate mass Removed and Total Volume of Water
Pumped
Nitrate Data Over Time for MW-30, MW-31, MW-5, and MW-11
Slug Test Results
Pre-Pumping Saturated Thickness
Pre-Pumping Hydraulic Gradients and Flow Calculations
11
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
Tab B Order of Sampling and Field Data Worksheets
Tab C Kriged Current Quarter Groundwater Contour Map and Weekly, Monthly and Quarterly
Depth to Water Data
Tab D Kriged Previous Quarter Groundwater Contour Map
Tab E Hydrographs of Groundwater Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab F Depths to Groundwater and Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab G Laboratory Analytical Reports
Tab H Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
H-1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation
H-2 Holding Time Evaluation
H-3 Analytical Method Check
H-4 Reporting Limit Evaluation
H-5 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
H-6 QC Control limits for Analysis and Blanks
H-7 Receipt Temperature Evaluation
H-8 Rinsate Evaluation
Tab I Kriged Current Quarter Nitrate and Chloride Isoconcentration Maps
Tab J Analyte Concentration Data Over Time
Tab K Nitrate and Chloride Concentration Trend Graphs
Tab L CSV Transmittal Letter
lll
AWAL
CA
CAP
CIR
DIFB
DRC
EFRI
ft amsl
GWDP
LCS
MS
MSD
QA
QAP
QC
RPD
sco
SOPs
UDEQ
voc
ACRONYM LIST
American West Analytical Laboratory
Consent Agreement
Corrective Action Plan
Contamination Investigation Report
Deionized Field Blanks
Utah Division of Radiation Control
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
feet above mean sea level
Groundwater Discharge Permit
Laboratory Control Spike
Matrix Spike
Matrix Spike Duplicate
Quality Assurance
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan
Quality Control
Relative Percent Difference
Stipulated Consent Order
Standard Operating Procedures
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
Volatile Organic Compounds
lV
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Utah Department of Environmental Quality ("UDEQ") Division of Radiation Control
("DRC") noted in a Request dated September 30, 2008 (the "Request"), for a Voluntary Plan and
Schedule to Investigate and Remediate Nitrate Contamination at the White Mesa Uranium Mill
(the "Mill") (the "Plan"), that nitrate levels have exceeded the State water quality standard of 10
mg/L in certain monitoring wells. As a result of the Request, Energy Fuels Resources (USA)
Inc. ("EFRI") entered into a Stipulated Consent Agreement with the Utah Water Quality Board
in January 2009 which directed the preparation of a Nitrate Contamination Investigation Report
("CIR"). A subsequent letter dated December 1, 2009, among other things, recommended that
EFRI also address elevated chloride concentrations in the CIR. The Stipulated Consent
Agreement was amended in August 2011. Under the amended Consent Agreement ("CA"),
EFRI submitted a Corrective Action Plan ("CAP"), pursuant to the requirements of the Utah
Groundwater Quality Protection Rules [UAC R317-6-6.15(C-E)] on November 29, 2011 and
revised versions of the CAP on February 27, 2012 and May 7, 2012. On December 12, 2012,
DRC signed the Stipulation and Consent Order ("SCO"), Docket Number UGW12-04, which
approved the EFRI CAP, dated May 7, 2012. The SCO ordered EFRI to fully implement all
elements of the May 7, 2012 CAP.
Based on the schedule included in the CAP and as delineated and approved by the SCO, the
activities associated with the implementation of the CAP began in January 2013. The reporting
requirements specified in the CAP and SCO are included in this quarterly nitrate report.
This is the Quarterly Nitrate Monitoring Rep01t, as required under the SCO, State of UDEQ
Docket No. UGW12-04 for the second quarter of 2014. This report meets the requirements of the
SCO, State of UDEQ Docket No. UGW12-04 and is the document which covers nitrate
corrective action and monitoring activities during the second quarter of 2014.
2.0 GROUNDWATER NITRATE MONITORING
2.1 Samples and Measurements Taken During the Quarter
A map showing the location of all groundwater monitoring wells, piezometers, existing wells,
temporary chloroform contaminant investigation wells and temporary nitrate investigation wells
is attached under Tab A. Nitrate samples and measurements taken during this reporting period
are discussed in the remainder of this section.
1
2.1.1 Nitrate Monitoring
Quarterly sampling for nitrate monitoring parameters was performed in the following wells:
TWN-1
TWN-2
TWN-3
TWN-4
TWN-7
TWN-18
TW4-22*
TW4-24*
TW4-25*
Piezometer 1
Piezometer 2
Piezometer 3
As discussed in Section 2.1.2 the analytical constituents required by the CAP are inorganic
chloride and nitrate+nitrite as N (referred to as nitrate in this document)
* Wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25 are chloroform investigation wells (wells installed and
sampled primarily for the chloroform investigation) and are sampled as part of the chloroform
program. The analytical suite for these three wells includes nitrate, chloride and a select list of
Volatile Organic Compounds ("VOCs") as specified in the chloroform program. These three
wells are included here because they are being pumped as part of the remediation of the nitrate
contamination as required by the SCO and the CAP. The nitrate and chloride data are included
in this report as well as in the chloroform program quarterly report. The VOC data for these
three wells will be reported in the chloroform quarterly monitoring report only.
The December 12, 2012 SCO approved the CAP, which specified the cessation of sampling in
TWN-5, TWN-6, TWN-8, TWN-9, TWN-10, TWN-11, TWN-12, TWN-13, TWN-14, TWN-15,
TWN-16, TWN-17, and TWN-19. The CAP and SCO also approved the abandonment ofTWN-
5, TWN-8, TWN-9, TWN-10, TWN-11, TWN-12, TWN-13, TWN-15, and TWN-17 within 1
year of the SCO approval. These wells were abandoned in accordance with the DRC-approved
Well Abandonment Procedure on July 31, 2013. Wells TWN-6, TWN-14, TWN-16, and TWN-
19 have been maintained for depth to groundwater monitoring only, as noted in the CAP.
Table 1 provides an overview of all locations sampled during the current period, along with the
date samples were collected from each location, and the date(s) upon which analytical data were
received from the contract laboratory. Table 1 also identifies rinsate samples collected, as well
as sample numbers associated with any required duplicates.
As indicated in Table 1, nitrate monitoring was performed in the nitrate monitoring wells,
chloroform wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25 and Piezometers 1, 2, and 3. Analytical data for
all of the above-listed wells, and the piezometers, are included in Tab G.
Nitrate and chloride are also monitored in all of the Mill's groundwater monitoring wells and
chloroform investigation wells. Data from those wells for this quarter are incorporated in certain
maps and figures in this report but are discussed in their respective programmatic reports.
2
2.1.2 Parameters Analyzed
Locations sampled during this reporting period were analyzed for the following constituents:
• Inorganic Chloride
• Nitrate plus Nitrite as Nitrogen (referred to herein as nitrate)
Use of analytical methods consistent with the requirements found in the White Mesa Mill
Groundwater Quality Assurance Plan, ("QAP") Revision 7.2, dated June 6, 2012 was confirmed
for all analytes, as discussed later in this report.
2.1.3 Groundwater Head and Level Monitoring
Depth to groundwater was measured in the following wells and/or piezometers, pursuant to Part
I.E.3 of the Groundwater Discharge Permit ("GWDP") (dated August 24, 2012):
• The quarterly groundwater compliance monitoring wells
• Existing well MW -4 and all of the temporary chloroform investigation wells
• Piezometers-P-1, P-2, P-3, P-4 and P-5
• MW-20, MW-22, and MW-34
• The DR piezometers that were installed during the Southwest Hydrogeologic
Investigation
• Nitrate wells TWN-1, TWN-2, TWN-3, TWN-4, TWN-6, TWN-7, TWN-14, TWN-16,
TWN-18 and TWN-19
In addition to the above, depth to water measurements are routinely observed in conjunction with
sampling events for all wells sampled during quarterly and accelerated efforts, regardless of the
sampling purpose.
All well levels used for groundwater contour mapping were measured and recorded within 5
calendar days of each other as indicated by the measurement dates in the summary sheet under
Tab C. Field data sheets for groundwater measurements are also provided in Tab C.
Weekly and monthly depth to groundwater measurements were taken in the chloroform pumping
wells MW-4, MW-26, TW4-19, TW4-20, and TW4-4, and the nitrate pumping wells TW4-22,
TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2. In addition, monthly water level measurements were taken in
non-pumping wells MW-27, MW-30, MW-31, TW4-21, TWN-1, TWN-3, TWN-4, TWN-7, and
TWN-18 as required by the CAP.
2.2 Sampling Methodology and Equipment and Decontamination Procedures
The QAP provides a detailed presentation of procedures utilized for groundwater sampling
activities under the GWDP (August 24, 2012).
The sampling methodology, equipment and decontamination procedures that were performed for
the nitrate contaminant investigation, as summarized below, are consistent with the QAP.
3
2.2.1 Well Purging, Sampling and Depth to Groundwater
A list of the wells in order of increasing nitrate contamination is generated quarterly. The order
for purging is thus established. The list is included with the Field Data Worksheets under Tab B.
Mill personnel start purging with all of the nondetect wells and then move to the wells with
detectable nitrate concentrations, progressing from the wells having the lowest nitrate
contamination to wells with the highest nitrate contamination.
Before leaving the Mill office, the pump and hose are decontaminated using the cleaning agents
described in Attachment 2-2 of the QAP. Rinsate blanks are collected at a frequency of one
rinsate per 20 field samples.
Purging is completed to remove stagnant water from the casing and to assure that representative
samples of formation water are collected for analysis. There are three purging strategies
specified in the QAP that are used to remove stagnant water from the casing during groundwater
sampling at the Mill. The three strategies are as follows:
1. Purging three well casing volumes with a single measurement of field parameters
2. Purging two casing volumes with stable field parameters (within 10% Relative Percent
Difference ["RPD"])
3. Purging a well to dryness and stability (within 10% RPD) of a limited list of field parameters
after recovery.
Mill personnel proceed to the first well, which is the well with the lowest concentration (i.e. non-
dectect) of nitrate based on the previous quarter's sampling results. Well depth measurements
are taken and the one casing volume is calculated. The purging strategy that will be used for the
well is determined at this time based on the depth to water measurement and the previous
production of the well. The Grundfos pump (a 6 to 10 gallon per minute [gpm] pump) is then
lowered to the appropriate depth in the well and purging is started. At the first well, the purge
rate is measured for the purging event by using a calibrated 5 gallon bucket. After the
evacuation of the well has been completed, the well is sampled when possible, and the pump is
removed from the well and the process is repeated at each well location moving from the least
contaminated to most contaminated well. If sample collection is not possible due to the well
being purged dry, a sample is collected after recovery using a disposable bailer and as described
in Attachment 2-3 of the QAP. Sample collection follows the procedures described in
Attachment 2-4 of the QAP.
After the samples have been collected for a particular well, the samples are placed into a cooler
that contains ice. The well is then recapped and Mill personnel proceed to the next well. If a
bailer has been used it is disposed of.
Decontamination of non-dedicated equipment, using the reagents in Attachment 2-2 of the QAP,
is performed between each sample location, and at the beginning of each sampling day, m
addition to the pre-event decontamination described above.
4
2.2.2 Piezometer Sampling
Samples are collected from Piezometers 1, 2 and 3, if possible. Samples are collected from
piezometers using a disposable bailer after one set of field measurements have been collected.
Due to the difficulty in obtaining samples from the piezometers, the purging protocols set out in
the QAP are not followed.
After samples are collected, the bailer is disposed of and samples are placed into a cooler
containing ice for sample preservation and transit to the Mill's contract analytical laboratory,
American West Analytical Laboratories ("AWAL").
2.3 Field Data
Attached under Tab B are copies of all Field Data Worksheets that were completed during the
quarter for the nitrate investigation monitoring wells and piezometers identified in Section 2.1.1
and Table 1.
2.4 Depth to Groundwater Data and Water Table Contour Map
Depth-to-groundwater measurements that were utilized for groundwater contours are included on
the Quarterly Depth to Water Sheet at Tab C of this Report along with the kriged groundwater
contour map for the current quarter generated from this data. All well levels used for
groundwater contour mapping were measured and recorded within 5 calendar days of each other
as indicated by the measurement dates in the summary sheet under Tab C. A copy of the kriged
groundwater contour map generated from the previous quarter's data is provided under Tab D.
2.5 Laboratory Results
2.5.1 Copy of Laboratory Results
The analytical results were provided by A W AL. Table 1 lists the dates when analytical results
were reported to the Quality Assurance ("QA") Manager for each well or other sample.
Analytical results for the samples collected for this quarter's nitrate investigation and a limited
list of chloroform investigation nitrate and chloride results are provided under Tab G of this
Report. Also included under Tab G are the results of analyses for duplicate samples and rinsate
samples for this sampling effort, as identified in Table 1. See the Groundwater Monitoring
Report and Chloroform Monitoring Report for this quarter for nitrate and chloroform analytical
results for the groundwater monitoring wells and chloroform investigation wells not listed in
Table 1.
2.5.2 Regulatory Framework
As discussed in Section 1.0 above, the Request, Plan, and CA each triggered a series of actions
on EFRI's part. Potential surficial sources of nitrate and chloride have been described in the
December 30, 2009 CIR and additional investigations into potential sources were completed and
discussed with DRC in 2011. Pursuant to theCA, the CAP was submitted to the Director of the
Division of Radiation Control (the "Director") on May 7, 2012. The CAP describes activities
5
associated with the nitrate in groundwater. The CAP was approved by the Director on December
12, 2012. This quarterly report documents the monitoring consistent with the program described
in the CAP.
3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCEANDDATA VALIDATION
EFRI's QA Manager performed a QNQuality Control ("QC") review to confirm compliance of
the monitoring program with the requirements of the QAP. As required in the QAP, data QA
includes preparation and analysis of QC samples in the field, review of field procedures, an
analyte completeness review, and QC review of laboratory data methods and data. Identification
of field QC samples collected and analyzed is provided in Section 3.1. Discussion of adherence
to Mill sampling Standard Operating Procedures ("SOPs") is provided in Section 3.2. Analytical
completeness review results are provided in Section 3.3. The steps and tests applied to check
field data QNQC, holding times, receipt temperature and laboratory data QNQC are discussed
in Sections 3.4.1 through 3.4.7 below.
The analytical laboratory has provided summary reports of the analytical QNQC measurements
necessary to maintain conformance with National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation
Conference certification and reporting protocol. The Analytical Laboratory QNQC Summary
Reports, including copies of the Mill's Chain of Custody and Analytical Request Record forms
for each set of Analytical Results, follow the analytical results under Tab G. Results of the
review of the laboratory QNQC information are provided under Tab H and discussed in Section
3.4, below.
3.1 Field QC Samples
The following QC samples were generated by Mill personnel and submitted to the analytical
laboratory in order to assess the quality of data resulting from the field sampling program.
Field QC samples for the nitrate investigation program consist of one field duplicate sample for
each 20 samples, DI Field Blanks ("DIFB"), and equipment rinsate samples.
During the quarter, one duplicate sample was collected as indicated in Table 1. The duplicate
was sent blind to the analytical laboratory and analyzed for the same parameters as the nitrate
wells.
One rinsate blank sample was collected as indicated on Table 1. Rinsate samples are labeled
with the name of the subsequently purged well with a terminal letter "R" added (e.g. TWN-7R).
The field QC sample results are included with the routine analyses under Tab G.
3.2 Adherence to Mill Sampling SOPs
The QA Manager review of Mill Personnel's adherence to the existing SOPs, confirmed that the
QNQC requirements established in the QAP and Chloroform QAP were met.
6
3.3 Analyte Completeness Review
All analyses required by the GWDP for nitrate monitoring for the period were performed.
3.4 Data Validation
The QAP and GWDP (August 24, 2012) identify the data validation steps and data QC checks
required for the nitrate monitoring program. Consistent with these requirements, the QA
Manager performed the following evaluations: a field data QA/QC evaluation, a holding time
evaluation, an analytical method check, a reporting limit evaluation, a QC evaluation of sample
duplicates, a QC evaluation of control limits for analysis and blanks, a receipt temperature
evaluation, and a rinsate evaluation. Because no VOCs are analyzed for the nitrate
contamination investigation, no trip blanks are required in the sampling program. Each
evaluation is discussed in the following sections. Data check tables indicating the results of each
test are provided under Tab H.
3.4.1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation
The QA Manager performs a review of all field recorded parameters to assess their adherence
with QAP requirements. The assessment involved review of two sources of information: the
Field Data Sheets and the Quarterly Depth to Water summary sheet. Review of the Field Data
Sheets addresses well purging volumes and stability of five parameters: conductance, pH,
temperature, redox potential, and turbidity. Review of the Depth to Water data confirms that all
depth measurements used for development of groundwater contour maps were conducted within
a five-day period of each other. The results of this quarter's review are provided under Tab H.
Based upon the review of the field data sheets, field work conformed with the QAP purging and
field measurement requirements. A summary of the purging techniques employed and field
measurements taken is described below:
Purgine Two Casinl! Volume with Stable Field Parameters Cwithjn 10% RPD)
Wells TWN-01, TWN-04, and TWN-18 were sampled after two casing volumes were removed.
Field parameters pH, specific conductivity, turbidity, water temperature, and redox potential
were measured during purging. All field parameters for this requirement were stable within 10%
RPD.
Purgin2: a Well to Dryness and S lability of a Limited List of Field Parameters
Wells TWN-03 and TWN-07 were purged to dryness before two casing volumes were evacuated.
After well recovery, one set of measurements for the field parameters of pH, specific
conductivity, and water temperature only were taken; the samples were collected, and another set
of measurements for pH, specific conductivity, and water temperature were taken. Stabilization
of pH, conductivity and temperature are required within 10% RPD under the QAP. All field
parameters for this requirement were stable within 10% RPD.
Continuously Pumped Wells
Wells TWN-02, TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-25 are continuously pumped wells. These wells are
pumped on a set schedule per the remediation plan and are considered sufficiently evacuated to
7
immediately collect a sample. As previously noted, TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-25 are
chloroform investigation wells and are sampled under the chloroform program. Data for nitrate
and chloride are provided here for completeness purposes.
During review of the field data sheets, it was observed that sampling personnel consistently
recorded depth to water to the nearest 0.01 foot.
All field parameters for all wells were within the QAP required limits, as indicated below.
The review of the field sheets for compliance with QAP requirements resulted in the
observations noted below. The QAP requirements in Attachment 2-3 specifically state that field
parameters must be stabilized to within 10% over at least 2 consecutive measurements for wells
purged to two casing volumes or to dryness. The QAP Attachment 2-3 states that turbidity
should be less than 5 NTU prior to sampling unless the well is characterized by water that has a
higher turbidity. The QAP Attachment 2-3 does not require that turbidity measurements be less
than 5 NTU prior to sampling. As such the noted observations regarding turbidity measurements
greater than 5 NTU below are included for information purposes only.
• Three well measurements exceeded the QAP's 5 NTU turbidity goal as noted in Tab H.
All required turbidity RPD's met the QAP Requirement to stabilize within 10%.
EFRI's letter to DRC of March 26, 2010 discusses further why turbidity does not appear to be an
appropriate parameter for assessing well stabilization. In response to DRC's subsequent
conespondence dated June 1, 2010 and June 24, 2010, EFRI completed a monitoring well
redevelopment program. The redevelopment report was submitted to DRC on September 30,
2011. DRC responded to the redevelopment report via letter on November 15, 2012. Per the
DRC letter dated November 15, 2012, the field data generated this quarter are compliant with the
turbidity requirements of the approved QAP.
3.4.2 Holding Time Evaluation
QAP Table 1 identifies the method holding times for each suite of parameters. Sample holding
time checks are provided in Tab H. All samples were received and analyzed within the required
holding time.
3.4.3 Analytical Method Checklist
All analytical methods reported by the laboratory were checked against the required methods
enumerated in the QAP. Analytical method checks are provided in Tab H. All methods were
consistent with the requirements of the QAP.
3.4.4 Reporting Limit Evaluation
All analytical method reporting limits ("RLs") reported by the laboratory were checked against
the reporting limits enumerated in the QAP. Reporting Limit Checks are provided in Tab H. All
analytes were measured and reported to the required reporting limits, with the exception of
several samples that had increased reporting limits due to matrix interference or required dilution
due to the sample concentration. However, in all of those cases the analytical results were
8
greater than the reporting limit used.
3.4.5 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
Section 9.1.4 a) of the QAP states that RPDs will be calculated for the comparison of duplicate
and original field samples. The QAP acceptance limits for RPDs between the duplicate and
original field sample is less than or equal to 20% unless the measured results are less than 5
times the required detection limit. This standard is based on the EPA Contract Laboratory
Program National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review, February 1994, 9240.1-05-
01 as cited in the QAP. The RPDs are calculated for duplicate pairs for all analytes regardless of
whether or not the reported concentrations are greater than 5 times the required detection limits.
However, data will be considered noncompliant only when the results are greater than 5 times
the required detection limit and the RPD is greater than 20%.
The duplicate results were within a 20% RPD. Results of the RPD test are provided in Tab H.
3.4.6 Other Laboratory QA/QC
Section 9.2 of the QAP requires that the laboratory's QNQC Manager check the following items
in developing data reports: (1) sample preparation information is correct and complete, (2)
analysis information is correct and complete, (3) appropriate Analytical Laboratory procedures
are followed, (4) analytical results are correct and complete, (5) QC samples are within
established control limits, (6) blanks are within QC limits, (7) special sample preparation and
analytical requirements have been met, and (8) documentation is complete. In addition to other
laboratory checks described above, EFRI' s QA Manager rechecks QC samples and blanks (items
(5) and (6)) to confirm that the percent recovery for spikes and the relative percent difference for
spike duplicates are within the method-specific required limits, or that the case narrative
sufficiently explains any deviation from these limits. Results of this quantitative check are
provided in Tab H.
The lab QNQC results met these specified acceptance limits.
The QAP Section 8.1 .2 requires that a Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate ("MS/MSD") pair
be analyzed with each analytical batch. The QAP does not specify acceptance limits for the
MS/MSD pair, and the QAP does not specify that the MS/MSD pair be prepared on EFRI
samples only. Acceptance limits for MS/MSDs are set by the laboratories. The review of the
information provided by the laboratories in the data packages verified that the QAP requirement
to analyze an MS/MSD pair with each analytical batch was met. While the QAP does not require
it, the recoveries were reviewed for compliance with the laboratory established acceptance limits.
The QAP does not require this level of review, and the results of this review are provided for
information only.
The information from the Laboratory QNQC Summary Reports indicates that the MS/MSDs
recoveries and the associated RPDs for the samples were within acceptable laboratory limits for
the regulated compounds except as indicated in Tab H. The MS/MSD recoveries that are outside
the laboratory established acceptance limits do not affect the quality or usability of the data
because the recoveries are above the acceptance limits and are indicative of matrix interference.
Matrix interferences are applicable to the individual sample results only. The requirement in the
9
QAP to analyze a MS/MSD pair with each analytical batch was met and as such the data are
compliant with the QAP.
The information from the Laboratory QNQC Summary Reports indicates that the Laboratory
Control Sample recoveries were acceptable, which indicate that the analytical system was
operating properly.
The QAP Section 8.1.2 requires that each analytical batch shall be accompanied by a reagent
blank. All analytical batches routinely contain a blank, which is a laboratory-grade water blank
sample made and carried through all analytical steps. For the Mill samples, a method blank is
prepared for all analytical methods. The information from the Laboratory QNQC Summary
Reports indicates that the method blanks did not contain detections of any target analytes above
the Reporting Limit.
3.4.7 Receipt Temperature Evaluation
Chain of Custody sheets were reviewed to confirm compliance with the QAP requirement in
QAP Table 1 that samples be received at 6°C or lower. Sample temperatures checks are
provided in Tab H. All samples were received within the required temperature limit.
3.4.8 Rinsate Check
Rinsate checks are provided in Tab H. A comparison of the rinsate blank sample concentration
levels to the QAP requirements -that rinsate sample concentrations be one order of magnitude
lower than that of the actual well -indicated that all of the rinsate blank analytes met this
criterion. Al rinsate and DIFB blank samples were non-detect for the quarter.
4.0 INTERPRETATION OF DATA
4.1 Interpretation of Groundwater Levels, Gradients and Flow Directions.
4.1.1 Current Site Groundwater Contour Map
As stated above, a listing of groundwater level readings for the current quarter (shown as depth
to groundwater in feet) is included under Tab C. The data from this tab has been interpreted
(interpolated by kriging) and plotted in a water table contour map, provided under the same tab.
The contour map is based on the current quarter's data for all wells.
The water level contour map indicates that perched water flow ranges from generally
southwesterly beneath the Mill site and tailings cells to generally southerly along the eastern and
western margins of White Mesa. Perched water mounding associated with the wildlife ponds
locally changes the generally southerly perched water flow patterns. For example, northeast of
the Mill site, mounding associated with wildlife ponds results in locally northerly flow near
PIEZ-1. The impact of the mounding associated with the northern ponds, to which water has not
been delivered since March 2012, is diminishing and is expected to continue to diminish as the
mound decays due to reduced recharge.
10
Not only has recharge from the wildlife ponds impacted perched water elevations and flow
directions at the site, but the cessation of water delivery to the northern ponds, which are
generally upgradient of the nitrate and chloroform plumes at the site, has resulted in changing
conditions that are expected to impact constituent concentrations and migration rates within the
plumes. Specifically, past recharge from the ponds has helped limit many constituent
concentrations within the plumes by dilution while the associated groundwater mounding has
increased hydraulic gradients and contributed to plume migration. Since use of the northern
wildlife ponds ceased in March 2012, the reduction in recharge and decay of the associated
groundwater mound are expected to increase many constituent concentrations within the plumes
while reducing hydraulic gradients and acting to reduce rates of plume migration. EFRI and its
consultants have raised the issues and potential effects associated with cessation of water
delivery to the northern wildlife ponds during discussions with DRC in March 2012 and May
2013.
The impacts associated with cessation of water delivery to the northern ponds are expected to
propagate downgradient (south and southwest) over time. Wells close to the ponds are generally
expected to be impacted sooner than wells farther downgradient of the ponds. Therefore,
constituent concentrations are generally expected to increase in downgradient wells close to the
ponds before increases are detected in wells fatther downgradient of the ponds. Although such
increases are anticipated to result from reduced dilution, the magnitude and timing of the
increases are difficult to predict due to the complex permeability distribution at the site and
factors such as pumping and the rate of decay of the groundwater mound. The potential exists for
some wells completed in higher permeability materials to be impacted sooner than some wells
completed in lower permeability materials even though the wells completed in lower
permeability materials may be closer to the ponds.
Localized increases in concentrations of constituents such as nitrate and chloride within and near
the nitrate plume may occur even when the nitrate plume is under control based on the Nitrate
CAP requirements. Ongoing mechanisms that can be expected to increase the concentrations of
nitrate and chloride locally as a result of reduced wildlife pond recharge include but are not
limited to:
1) Reduced dilution -the nnxmg of low constituent concentration pond recharge into
existing perched groundwater will be reduced over time.
2) Reduced saturated thicknesses -dewatering of higher permeability zones recetvmg
primarily low constituent concentration pond water will result in wells intercepting the
zones receiving a smaller proportion of the low constituent concentration water.
The combined impact of the above two mechanisms may be especially evident at chloroform
pumping wells MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19, and TW4-20; nitrate pumping wells TW4-22,
TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2; and non-pumped wells adjacent to the pumped wells. The
overall impact is expected to be generally higher constituent concentrations in these wells over
the short term until mass reduction resulting from pumping and natural attenuation eventually
reduce concentrations.
In addition to changes in the flow regime caused by reduced wildlife pond recharge, perched
flow directions are locally influenced by operation of the chloroform and nitrate pumping wells.
11
As shown in the detail water level map provided under Tab C, well defined cones of depression
are evident in the vicinity of all chloroform pumping wells except TW 4-4, which began pumping
in the first quarter of 2010. Although operation of chloroform pumping well TW 4-4 has
depressed the water table in the vicinity of TW4-4, a well-defined cone of depression is not
clearly evident. The lack of a well-defined cone of depression near TW4-4 likely results from 1)
variable permeability conditions in the vicinity of TW 4-4, and 2) persistent relatively low water
levels at adjacent well TW4-14.
Pumping of nitrate wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 began during the first quarter
of 2013. Water level patterns near these wells are expected to be influenced by the presence of
and the decay of the groundwater mound associated with the northern wildlife ponds, and by the
persistently low water level elevation at TWN-7, which is located upgradient of the nitrate
pumping wells
Decreases in water levels at nitrate pumping wells TWN-2, TW4-22 and TW4-25 this quarter are
consistent with continuing development of capture associated with nitrate pumping, which is
expected to increase over time as water levels decline due to pumping and to cessation of water
delivery to the northern wildlife ponds. Interaction between nitrate and chloroform pumping is
expected to enhance the capture of the nitrate pumping system. The long term interaction
between nitrate and chloroform pumping systems will, however, require more data to be
collected as part of routine monitoring.
As discussed above, variable permeability conditions are one likely reason for the lack of a well-
defined cone of depression near chloroform pumping well TW4-4. Changes in water levels at
wells immediately south of TW 4-4 resulting from TW 4-4 pumping are expected to be muted
because TW4-4 is located at a transition from relatively high to relatively low permeability
conditions south (downgradient) of TW4-4. The permeability of the perched zone at TW4-6 and
TW4-26, and recently installed wells TW4-29, TW4-30, TW4-31, TW4-33, TW4-34, and new
well TW4-35 is one to two orders of magnitude lower than at TW4-4. Any drawdown of water
levels at wells immediately south of TW4-4 resulting from TW4-4 pumping is also difficult to
determine because of the general, long-term increase in water levels in this area due to recharge
from the wildlife ponds.
Water levels at TW4-4 and TW4-6 increased by nearly 2.7 and 2.9 feet, respectively, between
the fourth quarter of 2007 and the fourth quarter of 2009 Gust prior to the start of TW 4-4
pumping) at rates of approximately 1.2 feeUyear and 1.3 feeUyear, respectively. However, the
rate of increase in water level at TW 4-6 has been reduced since the start of pumping at TW 4-4
(first quarter of 2010) to less than 0.5 feeUyear suggesting that TW4-6 is within the hydraulic
influence of TW4-4 (note: hydrographs for these wells are provided in the quarterly Chloroform
Monitoring Report). Water level elevations at these wells are eventually expected to be
influenced by cessation of water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds as discussed above.
Recharge from the southern wildlife pond is expected to continue to have an effect on water
levels near TW 4-4, but the effects related to recharge from the northern ponds is expected to
diminish over time as water is no longer delivered to the northern ponds.
The lack of a well-defined cone of depression at TW4-4 is also influenced by the persistent,
relatively low water level at non-pumping well TW4-14, located east of TW4-4 and TW4-6. For
12
the current quarter, the water level at TW4-14 was measured at approximately 5529.2 feet above
mean sea level ("ft amsl"). This is approximately 10 feet lower than the water level at TW4-6
(approximately 5538.9 ft amsl) and 14 feet lower than the water level at TW4-4 (approximately
5543.6 ft amsl) even though TW4-4 is pumping.
Well TW4-27 (installed south of TW4-14 in the fourth quarter of 2011) has a static water level
of approximately 5527.4 ft amsl, similar to TW4-14 (approximately 5529.2 ft amsl). Prior to the
installation of TW 4-27, the persistent! y low water level at TW 4-14 was considered anomalous
because it appeared to be downgradient of all three wells TW4-4, TW4-6, and TW4-26, yet
chloroform was not detected at TW4-14. Chloroform had apparently migrated from TW4-4 to
TW4-6 and from TW4-6 to TW4-26 which suggested that TW4-26 was actually downgradient of
TW4-6, and TW4-6 was actually downgradient of TW4-4, regardless of the flow direction
implied by the low water level at TW4-14. The water level at TW4-26 (5537.9 feet amsl) is,
however, lower than water levels at adjacent wells TW4-6 (5538.9 feet amsl), and TW4-23
(5541.4 feet amsl), as shown in the detail water level map under Tab C.
Hydraulic tests indicate that the permeability at TW4-27 is an order of magnitude lower than at
TW4-6 and three orders of magnitude lower than at TW4-4 (see Hydro Geo Chern, Inc. [HGC],
September 20, 2010: Hydraulic Testing of TW4-4, TW4-6, and TW4-26, White Mesa Uranium
Mill, July 2010; and HGC, November 28, 2011: Installation, Hydraulic Testing, and Perched
Zone Hydrogeology of Perched Monitoring Well TW4-27, White Mesa Uranium Mill Near
Blanding, Utah). The similar water levels at TW4-14 and TW4-27, and the low permeability
estimate at TW4-27 suggest that both wells are completed in materials having lower permeability
than nearby wells. The low permeability condition likely reduces the rate of long-term water
level increase at TW4-14 and TW4-27 compared to nearby wells, yielding water levels that
appear anomalously low. This behavior is consistent with hydraulic test data collected from
recently installed wells TW4-29, TW4-30, TW4-31, TW4-33 and TW4-34 which indicate that
the permeability of these wells is one to two orders of magnitude higher than the permeability of
TW4-27 (see HGC, January 23, 2014; Contamination Investigation Report, TW4-12 and TW4-
27 Areas, White Mesa Uranium Mill Near Blanding, Utah; and HGC, July 1, 2014, Installation
and Hydraulic Testing ofTW4-35 and TW4-36, White Mesa Uranium Mill Near Blanding, Utah
[As-Built Report]). Hydraulic tests also indicate that the permeability at TW4-36 is slightly
higher than but comparable to the low permeability at TW4-27, suggesting that TW4-36, TW4-
14 and TW4-27 are completed in a continuous low permeability zone.
4.1.2 Comparison of Current Groundwater Contour Map to Groundwater Contour Map
for Previous Quarter
The groundwater contour maps for the Mill site for the previous quarter, as submitted with the
Nitrate Monitoring Report for the previous quarter, are attached under Tab D.
A comparison of the water table contour maps for the current quarter (second quarter of 2014) to
the water table contour maps for the previous quarter (first quarter of 2014) indicates slightly
larger drawdowns related to operation of chloroform pumping wells MW-26, TW4-19 and TW4-
20 and nitrate pumping well TW4-25. Nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and
TWN-2 were brought into operation during the first quarter of 2013 and their impact on water
13
level patterns was evident as of the fourth quarter of 2013. Water levels in nitrate pumping wells
TW4-22, TW4-25, and TWN-2 showed small decreases this quarter, consistent with continuing
development of cones of depression centered on these wells, and with the development of
capture associated with the nitrate pumping system.
As discussed in Section 4.1.1, pumping at chloroform well TW4-4, which began in the first
quarter of 2010, has depressed the water table near TW4-4, but a well-defined cone of depression
is not clearly evident, likely due to variable permeability conditions near TW4-4 and the
persistently low water level at adjacent well TW 4-14.
Water levels and water level contours for the site have not changed significantly since the last
quarter except for a few locations. Reported decreases in water levels (increases in drawdown)
of approximately 4.4, 3.6, 3.2, and 2.4 feet occurred in chloroform pumping wells MW-26,
TW4-19, TW4-20 and nitrate pumping well TW4-25, respectively. Changes in water levels at
other pumping wells (chloroform pumping wells MW-4 and TW4-4, and nitrate pumping wells
TW4-22, TW4-24 and TWN-2) were less than 2 feet. Water level fluctuations at pumping wells
typically occur in part because of fluctuations in pumping conditions just prior to and at the time
the measurements are taken.
The decreases in water levels (increases in drawdown) at chloroform pumping wells MW-26,
TW4-19 and TW4-20 and nitrate pumping well TW4-25 have slightly increased the apparent
capture of these wells relative to other pumping wells.
Reported water level decreases of 1.3 and 0.9 feet at Piezometers 2 and 3 likely result from
cessation of water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds as discussed in Section 4.1.1 and the
consequent continuing decay of the associated perched water mound. The reported water level
decreases of 1.4 feet and 1.9 feet at Piezometers 4 and 5 may result from reduced recharge at the
southern wildlife pond.
Reported water levels decreased by 3.5 feet at MW-20 and increased by 2.3 feet at MW-37
between the previous quarter and the current quarter. The water level decrease at MW-20 likely
resulted from insufficient recovery after purging and sampling due to its low permeability. The
water level increase at MW -37 is within the range of historical variability at this well. This
variability is also likely the result of low permeability and variable intervals between
purging/sampling and water level measurement.
4.1.3 Hydrographs
Attached under Tab E are hydrographs showing groundwater elevation in each nitrate
contaminant investigation monitor well over time. Per the CAP, nitrate wells TWN-6, TWN-14,
TWN-16, and TWN-19 have been maintained for depth to groundwater monitoring only. These
hydrographs are also included in Tab E.
As noted in Section 2.1.1, nitrate wells TWN-05, TWN-08, TWN-09, TWN-10, TWN-11, TWN-
12, TWN-13, TWN-15, and TWN-17 were abandoned in accordance with the DRC-approved
Well Abandonment Procedure on July 31, 2013. The historic hydrographs will not be included
in future quarterly reports unless requested by DRC.
14
4.1.4 Depth to Groundwater Measured and Groundwater Elevation
Attached in Tab F are tables showing depth to groundwater measured and groundwater elevation
over time for each of the wells listed in Section 2.1.1 above.
As noted in Section 2.1.1, nitrate wells TWN-05, TWN-08, TWN-09, TWN-10, TWN-11, TWN-
12, TWN-13, TWN-15, and TWN-17 were abandoned in accordance with the DRC-approved
Well Abandonment Procedure on July 31, 2013. The historic measured depth to groundwater
and groundwater elevation data will not be included in future quarterly reports unless requested
byDRC.
4.2 Effectiveness of Hydraulic Containment and Capture
4.2.1 Hydraulic Containment and Control
The CAP states that hydraulic containment and control will be evaluated in part based on water
level data and in part on concentrations in wells downgradient of pumping wells TW4-22 and
TW4-24.
As per the CAP, the fourth quarter of 2013 was the first quarter that hydraulic capture associated
with nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 was evaluated. Hydraulic
containment and control based on water level data is considered successful per the CAP if the
entire nitrate plume upgradient of TW4-22 and TW4-24 falls within the combined capture of the
nitrate pumping wells. Capture zones based on water level contours calculated by kriging the
current quarter's water level data are provided on water level contour maps included under Tab
C. The nitrate capture zones are defined by the bounding stream tubes associated with nitrate
pumping wells. Each bounding stream tube represents a flow line parallel to the hydraulic
gradient and therefore perpendicular to the intersected water level contours. Assuming that the
stream tubes do not change over time, all flow between the bounding stream tubes associated
with a particular pumping well is presumed to eventually reach and be removed by that well.
Capture associated with chloroform pumping wells is also included on these maps because the
influence of the chloroform and nitrate pumping systems overlap.
The specific methodology for calculating the nitrate capture zones is substantially the same as
that used since the fourth quarter of 2005 to calculate the capture zones for the chloroform
program, as agreed to by the DRC and International Uranium (USA) Corp. The procedure for
calculating nitrate capture zones is as follows:
1) Calculate water level contours by gridding the water level data on approximately 50-foot
centers using the ordinary linear kriging method in Surfer™. Default kriging parameters
are used that include a linear variogram, an isotropic data search, and all the available
water level data for the quarter, including relevant seep and spring elevations.
2) Calculate the capture zones by hand from the kriged water level contours following the
rules for flow nets:
-from each pumping well, reverse track the stream tubes that bound the capture zone of
each well,
-maintain perpedicularity between each stream tube and the kriged water level contours.
15
A decrease in water level at nitrate pumping well TW4-25 of approximately 2.4 feet slightly
increased the apparent capture of this well compared to last quarter. The water level changes
reported at nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24 and TWN-2 were less than two feet, as were
the reported water level changes at chloroform pumping wells MW-4 and TW4-4. However,
decreases in water levels at nitrate pumping wells TW4-22 and TW4-24 indicated that the
capture associated with nitrate pumping wells continues to develop. Reported water level
decreases of 4.4, 3.6 and 3.2 feet at chloroform pumping wells MW-26, TW4-19 and TW4-20,
respectively, slightly increased the apparent capture associated with these wells.
The capture associated with nitrate pumping wells is expected to increase over time as water
levels continue to decline due to pumping and to cessation of water delivery to the northern
wildlife ponds. Slow development of hydraulic capture is consistent with and expected based on
the relatively low permeability of the perched zone at the site. Furthermore, the presence of the
perched groundwater mound, and the apparently anomalously low water level at TWN-7, will
influence the definition of capture associated with the nitrate pumping system.
That pumping is likely sufficient to eventually capture the entire plume upgradient of TW4-22
and TW4-24 can be demonstrated by comparing the combined average pumping rates of all
nitrate pumping wells for the current quarter to estimates of pre-pumping flow through the nitrate
plume near the locations of TW4-22 and TW4-24. The pre-pumping flow calculation is assumed
to represent a steady state 'background' condition that includes constant recharge, hydraulic
gradients, and saturated thicknesses. Changes after pumping are assumed to result only from
pumping. As will be discussed below, the average combined nitrate pumping rate for the quarter
exceeds the calculated pre-pumping rate of perched water flow through the nitrate plume by a
factor between approximately 1.1 and 2.4.
The cumulative volume of water removed by TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 during
the current quarter was approximately 413,620 gallons. This equates to an average total
extraction rate of approximately 3.2 gpm over the 90 day quarter. This average accounts for time
periods when pumps were off due to insufficient water columns in the wells.
Pre-pumping flow through the nitrate plume near TW4-22 and TW4-24 was estimated using
Darcy's Law to lie within a range of approximately 1.31 gpm to 2.79 gpm. Calculations were
based on an average hydraulic conductivity range of 0.15 feet per day (ft/day) to 0.32 ftlday
(depending on the calculation method), a pre-pumping hydraulic gradient of 0.025 feet per foot
(ft/ft), a plume width of 1,200 feet, and a saturated thickness (at TW4-22 and TW4-24) of 56
feet. The hydraulic conductivity range was estimated by averaging the results obtained from slug
test data that were collected automatically by data loggers from wells within the plume and
analyzed using the KGS unconfined slug test solution available in Aqtesolve™ (see Hydro Geo
Chern, Inc. [HGC], August 3, 2005: Perched Monitoring Well Installation and Testing at the
White Mesa Uranium Mill, April Through June 2005; HGC, March 10, 2009: Perched Nitrate
Monitoring Well Installation and Hydraulic Testing, White Mesa Uranium Mill; and HGC,
March 17 2009: Letter Report to David Frydenlund, Esq, regarding installation and testing of
TW4-23, TW4-24, and TW4-25). These results are summarized in Table 6. Data from fourth
16
quarter 2012 were used to estimate the pre-pumping hydraulic gradient and saturated thickness.
These data are also summarized in Tables 7 and 8.
The average hydraulic conductivity was estimated to lie within a range of 0.15 ft/day to 0.32
ft/day. Averages were calculated four ways. As shown in Table 6 arithmetic and geometric
averages for wells MW-30, MW-31, TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, TWN-2, and TWN-3 were
calculated as 0.22 and 0.15 ft/day, respectively. Arithmetic and geometric averages for a subset
of these wells (MW-30, MW-31, TW4-22, and TW4-24) were calculated as 0.32 and 0.31 ft/day,
respectively. The lowest value, 0.15 ft/day, represented the geometric average of the hydraulic
conductivity estimates for all the plume wells. The highest value, 0.32 ft/day, represented the
arithmetic average for the four plume wells having the highest hydraulic conductivity estimates
(MW-30, MW-31, TW4-22, and TW4-24).
Pre-pumping hydraulic gradients were estimated at two locations; between TW4-25 and MW-31
(estimated as 0.023 ft/ft), and between TWN-2 and MW-30 (estimated as 0.027 ft/ft). These
results were averaged to yield the value used in the calculation (0.025 ft/ft). The pre-pumping
saturated thickness of 56 feet was an average of pre-pumping saturated thicknesses at TW4-22
and TW4-24.
The hydraulic gradient and saturated thickness used in the calculations are assumed to represent
a steady state 'background' condition. However, assumption of a steady state 'background' is
inconsistent with the cessation of water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds, located
upgradient of the nitrate plume. Hydraulic gradients and saturated thicknesses within the plume
are declining as a result of two factors: reduced recharge from the ponds, and the effects of
nitrate pumping. Separating the impacts of nitrate pumping from the impacts of reduced recharge
from the ponds is problematic. Should pumping cease and 'background' conditions be allowed to
re-establish, however, smaller hydraulic gradients and saturated thicknesses would be expected
due to reduced recharge, which would lower estimates of 'background' flow.
As a result, the 'background' flow calculated using the hydraulic gradient of 0.025 ft/ft and
saturated thickness of 56 feet is considered conservatively large. Furthermore, using the
arithmetic average hydraulic conductivity of a subset of plume wells having the highest
conductivities is considered less representative of actual conditions than using the geometric
average conductivity of all of the plume wells. Nitrate pumping may therefore exceed flow
through the plume by a factor greater than 2.4, the high end of the calculated range.
The CAP states that MW-5, MW-11, MW-30, and MW-31 are located downgradient of TW4-22
and TW4-24. MW-30 and MW-31 are within the plume near its downgradient edge and MW-5
and MW -11 are outside and downgradient of the plume. Per the CAP, hydraulic control based on
concentration data will be considered successful if the concentrations of nitrate in MW -30 and
MW-31 remain stable or decline, and concentrations of nitrate in downgradient wells MW-5 and
MW -11 do not exceed the 10 mg!L standard.
Table 5 presents the nitrate concentration data for MW-30, MW-31, MW-5 and MW-11, which
are down-gradient of pumping wells TW4-22 and TW4-24. Based on these concentration data,
the nitrate plume is under control.
17
The plume has not migrated downgradient to MW-5 or MW-11 because nitrate was not detected
at MW -5 or MW -11. Between the previous and current quarters, nitrate concentrations changed
slightly in both MW-30 and MW-31. Nitrate in MW-30 decreased from 18.4 mg/L to 17.9 mg/L
and nitrate in MW-31 increased from 20.6 mg/L to 23.3 mg/L. Changes in both wells were less
than 20% suggesting the changes are within the range typical for sampling and analytical error.
Although short-term fluctuations have occurred, nitrate concentrations in MW-30 and MW-31
have been relatively stable, demonstrating that plume migration is minimal or absent.
Chloride has been relatively stable at MW-30 but appears to be increasing at MW-31 (see Tab J
and Tab K, discussed in Section 4.2.4). The apparent increase in chloride and stable nitrate at
MW -31 suggests a natural attenuation process that is affecting nitrate but not chloride. A likely
process that would degrade nitrate but leave chloride unaffected is reduction of nitrate by pyrite.
The likelihood of this process in the perched zone is discussed in HGC, December 7 2012;
Investigation of Pyrite in the Perched Zone, White Mesa Uranium Mill Site, Blanding, Utah.
4.2.2 Current Nitrate and Chloride Isoconcentration Maps
Included under Tab I of this Report are current nitrate and chloride iso-concentration maps for
the Mill site. Nitrate iso-contours start at 5 mg/L and chloride iso-contours start at 100 mg/L
because those values appear to separate the plumes from background. All nitrate and chloride
data used to develop these iso-concentration maps are from the current quarter's sampling
events.
4.2.3 Comparison of Areal Extent
Changes in nitrate concentration at wells within the nitrate plume since the last quarter have
resulted in a slight shrinkage of the plume area. The northeastern extent of the plume has been
reduced, with the plume boundary moving to the west away from TW4-19, TW4-20, and TW4-
25, due to decreases in concentrations at these wells and at TW4-22. Concentrations at
chloroform pumping wells TW4-19 and TW4-20 decreased from approximately 1.6 mg/L and
7.6 mg/L, respectively, to 1.3 and 6.0 mg/L. Concentrations at nitrate pumping wells TW4-22
and TW4-25 decreased from approximately 54.6 mg/L and 2.1 mg/L,respectively, to 47.2 mg/L
and 1.2 mg/L.
The nitrate concentration at TW4-18 decreased for the second consecutive quarter, from 12.8
mg/L to 12.2 mg/L, reversing a previously upward trend, and suggesting stabilization. Last
quarter, most of the wells in the vicinity of TW4-18 (directly downgradient of the northern
wildlife ponds to the south and south-west) showed slight increases in nitrate concentrations.
Changes in this area are expected to result from changes in pumping and from the cessation of
water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds. The reduction in low-nitrate recharge from the
ponds appeared to be having the anticipated effect of generally increased nitrate concentrations
in wells downgradient of the ponds. However, this quarter, most wells in the vicinity ofTW4-18
showed slight decreases in nitrate concentrations, suggesting that conditions in this area have
stabilized.
Although increases in concentration in the area downgradient of the wildlife ponds have been
anticipated as the result of reduced dilution, the magnitude and timing of the increases are
difficult to predict due to the measured variations in hydraulic conductivity at the site and other
factors. Nitrate in the area directly downgradient (south to south-southwest) of the northern
18
wildlife ponds is associated with the chloroform plume, is cross-gradient of the nitrate plume as
defined in the CAP, and is within the capture zone of the chloroform pumping system (primarily
chloroform pumping well MW-26). Perched water flow in the area is to the southwest in the
same approximate direction as the main body of the nitrate plume.
Nitrate concentrations at the downgradient edge of the plume (MW-30 and MW-31) continue to
be relatively stable, demonstrating that plume migration is minimal or absent. With regard to
chloroform, the boundary of the northern portion of the chloroform plume has migrated to the
west toward nitrate pumping well TW4-24 since pumping began. More details regarding the
chloroform data and interpretation are included in the Quarterly Chloroform Monitoring Report
submitted under separate cover.
4.2.4 Nitrate and Chloride Concentration Trend Data and Graphs
Attached under Tab J is a table summarizing values for nitrate and chloride for each well over
time.
Attached under Tab K are graphs showing nitrate and chloride concentration plots in each
monitor well over time.
As noted in Section 2.1.1, nitrate wells TWN-05, TWN-08, TWN-09, TWN-10, TWN-11, TWN-
12, TWN-13, TWN-15, and TWN-17 were abandoned in accordance with the DRC-approved
Well Abandonment Procedure on July 31, 2013. The historic trend data will not be included in
future quarterly reports unless requested by DRC.
4.2.5 Interpretation of Analytical Data
Comparing the nitrate analytical results to those of the previous quarter, as summarized in the
tables included under Tab J, the following observations can be made for wells within and
immediately surrounding the nitrate plume:
a) Nitrate concentrations have increased by more than 20% in the following wells
compared to last quarter: TW4-16 and TWN-3;
b) Nitrate concentrations have decreased by more than 20% in the following wells
compared to last quarter: MW-26, TW4-20, TW4-25, and TWN-7;
c) Nitrate concentrations have remained within 20% in the following wells compared to
last quarter: MW-27, MW-30, MW-31, TW4-5, TW4-10, TW4-18, TW4-19, TW4-21,
TW4-22, TW4-24, TWN-1, TWN-2, TWN-4, and TWN-18; and
d) MW-11, MW-25, and MW-32 remained non-detect
As indicated, nitrate concentrations for many of the wells with detected nitrate were within 20%
of the values reported for the wells during the previous quarter, suggesting that variations are
within the range typical for sampling and analytical error. The remaining wells had changes in
concentration greater than 20%. The latter includes chloroform pumping wells MW -26 and
TW4-20 and nitrate pumping well TW4-25. TW4-16 is located adjacent to chloroform pumping
19
well MW-26, and TWN-3 is located adjacent to nitrate pumping well TWN-2. Fluctuations in
concentrations at pumping wells and wells adjacent to pumping wells likely result in part from
the effects of pumping as discussed in Section 4.1.1.
The nitrate concentration in nitrate pumping well TW4-25 decreased from approximately 2.2
mg/L last quarter to 1.2 mg/L this quarter. The nitrate concentrations in chloroform pumping
wells MW-26 and TW4-20 decreased from approximately 2.1 mg/L and 7.6 mg/L, respectively,
to approximately 0.9 mg/L and 6.0 mg/L. Chloroform concentrations at nitrate pumping wells
TW4-22 and TW4-24 increased from 12,100 flg/L to 12,400 flg/L and decreased from 78.5 flg/L
ti 62.7 flg/L, respectively, this quarter, The decrease at TW4-24 brought the chloroform plume
boundary back to the east of TW4-24. Chloroform changes are likely in response to the start-up
of nitrate pumping in the first quarter of 2013 and are affected by the presence of historically
high chloroform concentrations at adjacent, cross-gradient well TW4-20. MW-27, located west
of TWN-2, and TWN-18, located north of TWN-3, bound the nitrate plume to the west and north
(See Figure 1-1 under Tab 1). In addition, the southernmost (downgradient) boundary of the
plume remains between MW-30/MW-31 and MW-5/MW-11. Nitrate concentrations at MW-5
(adjacent to MW-11) and MW-11 have historically been low(< 1 mg/L) or non-detect for nitrate
(See Table 5). MW-25, MW-26, MW-32, TW4-16, TW4-19, TW4-20, TW4-25, TWN-1, and
TWN-4 bound the nitrate plume to the east.
As discussed above, the northeastern extent of the plume has been slightly reduced, with the
plume boundary moving to the west away from TW4-19, TW4-20, and TW4-25, primarily due
to decreases in concentrations at these wells and TW4-22. Nitrate concentrations outside the
nitrate plume exceed 10 mg/L at a few locations: TW4-10 (13.9 mg/L), TW4-12 (17.0 mg/L),
TW4-18 (12.2 mg/L), TW4-26 (12.5 mg/L), TW4-27 (31.1 mg/L), and TW4-28 (16.5 mg/L). All
these wells are located southeast of the nitrate plume as defined in the CAP and all are separated
from the plume by wells having nitrate concentrations that are either non-detect, or, if detected,
are less than 10 mg/L. Concentrations at TW4-10, TW4-12, TW4-18, TW4-26, TW4-27 and
TW4-28 are within 20% of their concentrations during the previous quarter. Elevated nitrate at
TW 4-10 and TW 4-18 is associated with the chloroform plume and is within the capture zone of
the chloroform pumping system. Elevated nitrate at TW4-12, TW4-26, TW4-27, and TW4-28 is
likely related to former cattle ranching operations at the site.
Chloride concentrations are measured because elevated chloride (greater than 100 mg/L) is
associated with the nitrate plume. Chloride concentrations are within 20% of their respective
concentrations during the previous quarter except at six locations within or adjacent to the nitrate
plume. Chloride concentrations at chloroform pumping well MW -26 and nitrate pumping well
TW4-25 decreased from 70.4 mg/L and 85.7 mg/L last quarter, respectively, to 53.4 mg/L and
51.1 mg/L. Chloride concentrations at nitrate pumping well TW4-24 increased from 809 mg/L
last quarter to 1,020 mg/L. Chloride concentration increases also occurred at TW4-5 (40.5 mg/L
to 51.4 mg/L), TW4-16 (66.8 mg/L to 80.7 mg/L), and TW4-21 (200 mg/L to 243 mg/L). These
three wells are in close proximity to chloroform pumping wells MW-26, TW4-19 and TW4-20.
Fluctuations in concentrations at pumping wells and wells adjacent to pumping wells likely
result in part from the effects of pumping. TW4-5, TW4-16 and TW4-21 are also located
immediately downgradient of the northern wildlife ponds. Increases in concentrations at wells
near (and downgradient of) the northern wildlife ponds are anticipated as a result of reduced
dilution caused by cessation of water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds.
20
4.3 Estimation of Pumped Nitrate Mass and Residual Nitrate Mass within the Plume
Nitrate mass removed by pumping is summarized in Table 2, and includes mass removed by both
chloroform and nitrate pumping wells. Table 3 shows the volume of water pumped at each well
and Table 4 provides the details of the nitrate removal for each well. Mass removal calculations
begin with the third quarter of 2010 because the second quarter, 2010 data were specified to be
used to establish a baseline mass for the nitrate plume. As stated in the CAP, the baseline mass is
to be calculated using the second quarter, 2010 concentration and saturated thickness data
"within the area of the kriged 10 mg/L plume boundary." The second quarter, 2010 data set was
considered appropriate because "the second quarter, 2010 concentration peak at TWN-2 likely
identifies a high concentration zone that still exists but has migrated away from the immediate
vicinity of TWN-2."
As shown in Table 2, a total of approximately 972 lb of nitrate has been removed from the
perched zone since the third quarter of 2010. Prior to the first quarter of 2013, all direct nitrate
mass removal resulted from operation of chloroform pumping wells MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4,
TW4-19, and TW4-20. During the current quarter:
• A total of approximately 102lb of nitrate was removed by the chloroform pumping wells
and by nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2.
• Of the 102 lb removed during the current quarter, approximately 92 lb, (or 90 %), was
removed by the nitrate pumping wells.
Baseline mass and current quarter mass estimates (nitrate + nitrite as N) for the nitrate plume are
approximately 43,700 lb and 30,620 lbs, respectively. Mass estimates were calculated within the
plume boundaries as defined by the kriged 10 mg/L isocon by 1) gridding (kriging) the nitrate
concentration data on 50-foot centers; 2) calculating the volume of water in each grid cell based
on the saturated thickness and assuming a porosity of 0.18; 3) calculating the mass of
nitrate+nitrite as N in each cell based on the concentration and volume of water for each cell; and
4) totaling the mass of all grid cells within the 10 mg/L plume boundary. Data used in these
calculations included data from wells listed in Table 3 of the CAP.
The nitrate mass estimate for the current quarter is lower than the baseline estimate by 13,080 lb,
and this difference is greater than the amount of nitrate mass removed directly by pumping.
Changes in the quarterly mass estimates are expected to result primarily from 1) nitrate mass
removed directly by pumping, 2) natural attenuation of nitrate, and 3) changes in nitrate
concentrations in wells within the plume as a result of re-distribution of nitrate within the plume
and changes in saturated thicknesses. Redistribution of nitrate within the plume and changes in
saturated thicknesses will be impacted by changes in pumping and in background conditions
such as the decay of the perched water mound associated with the northern wildlife ponds.
Cessation of water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds is expected to result in reduced
saturated thicknesses and reduced dilution, which in turn is expected to result in increases in
concentrations.
The mass estimate during the current quarter (30,620 lb) was smaller than the mass estimate
during the previous quarter (31 ,410 lb) by 790 lb or less than 3%. Part of this difference may
21
result from slightly lower nitrate concentrations measured in some wells within the plume this
quarter compared to last quarter, especially TW4-22, which decreased from approximately 54.6
mg!L to 47.2 mg!L.
Nitrate mass removal by pumping and natural attenuation (expected to result primarily from
pyrite oxidation/nitrate reduction) act to lower nitrate mass within the plume. Changes resulting
from redistribution of nitrate within the plume are expected to result in both increases and
decreases in concentrations at wells within the plume and therefore increases and decreases in
mass estimates based on those concentrations, thus generating 'noise' in the mass estimates.
Furthermore, because the sum of sampling and analytical error is typically about 20%, changes
in the mass estimates from quarter to quarter of up to 20% could result from typical sampling
and analytical error alone. Only longer-term analyses of the mass estimates that minimize the
impacts of these quarter to quarter variations will provide useful information on plume mass
trends. Over the long term, nitrate mass estimates are expected to trend downward as a result of
direct removal by pumping and through natural attenuation.
As specified in the CAP, once eight quarters of data have been collected (starting with the first
quarter of 2013), a regression trend line will be applied to the quarterly mass estimates and
evaluated. The trend line will then be updated quarterly and reevaluated as additional quarters of
data are collected. The evaluation will determine whether the mass estimates are increasing,
decreasing, or stable.
5.0 LONG TERM PUMP TEST AT TWN-02, TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-
25 OPERATIONS REPORT
5.1 Introduction
Beginning in January 2013, EFRI began long term pumping of TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and
TWN-02 as required by the Nitrate CAP, dated May 7, 2012 and the SCO dated December 12,
2012.
In addition, as a part of the investigation of chloroform contamination at the Mill site, EFRI has
been conducting a Long Term Pump Test on MW-4, TW4-19, MW-26, and TW4-20, and, since
January 31, 2010, TW 4-4. The purpose of the test is to serve as an interim action that will
remove a significant amount of chloroform-contaminated water while gathering additional data
on hydraulic properties in the area of investigation.
Because wells MW-4, TW4-19, MW-26, TW4-4 and TW4-20 are pumping wells that may
impact the removal of nitrate, they are included in this report and any nitrate removal realized as
part of this pumping is calculated and included in the quarterly reports.
The following information documents the operational activities during the quarter.
5.2 Pumping Well Data Collection
Data collected during the quarter included the following:
22
• Measurement of water levels at MW-4, TW4-19, MW-26, and TW4-20 and,
commencing regularly on March 1, 2010, TW4-4, on a weekly basis, and at
selected temporary wells and permanent monitoring wells on a monthly basis.
• Measurement of pumping history, including:
pumping rates
total pumped volume
operational and non-operational periods.
• Periodic sampling of pumped water for chloroform and nitrate/nitrite analysis and
other constituents
• Measurement of water levels weekly at TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-02
commencing January 28, 2013, and on a monthly basis selected temporary wells
and permanent monitoring wells.
5.3 Water Level Measurements
Beginning August 16, 2003, water level measurements from chloroform pumping wells MW-4,
MW-26, and TW4-19 were conducted weekly. From commencement of pumping TW4-20, and
regularly after March 1, 2010 for TW4-4, water levels in these two chloroform pumping wells
have been measured weekly. From commencement of pumping in January 2013, water levels in
wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-02 have been measured weekly. Copies of the
weekly Depth to Water monitoring sheets for MW-4, MW-26, TW4-19, TW4-20, TW4-4, TW4-
22, TW4-24, TW4-25 and TWN-02 are included under Tab C.
Monthly depth to water monitoring is required for all of the chloroform contaminant
investigation wells and non-pumping wells MW-27, MW-30, MW-31, TW4-21, TWN-1, TWN-
3, TWN-4, TWN-7, and TWN-18. Copies of the monthly depth to Water monitoring sheets are
included under Tab C.
5.4 Pumping Rates and Volumes
The pumping wells do not pump continuously, but are on a delay device. The wells purge for a
set amount of time and then shut off to allow the well to recharge. Water from the pumping
wells is either transferred to the Cell 1 evaporation pond or is used in the Mill process.
The pumped wells are fitted with a flow meter which records the volume of water pumped from
the well in gallons. The flow meter readings shown in Tab C are used to calculate the gallons of
water pumped from the wells each quarter as required by Section 7.2.2 of the CAP. The average
pumping rates and quarterly volumes for each of the pumping wells are shown in Table 3. The
cumulative volume of water pumped from each of the wells is shown in Table 4.
On April 28, 2014, EFRI Field Personnel noted that the flow meter in TW4-20 had water in it,
making it difficult to read. The flow meter in TW4-20 was replaced on April 29, 2014 with no
down time noted. Therefore, no notice to DRC was required.
Except as noted above, no other operational problems were observed with the wells or pumping
equipment during the quarter.
23
6.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT
There are no corrective actions resulting from the 2nd quarter 2014 nitrate sampling event.
6.1 Assessment of Previous Quarter's Corrective Actions
There were no corrective actions in the 1st quarter 2014 nitrate sampling event.
7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
As per the CAP, the current quarter is the third quarter that hydraulic capture associated with
nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 was evaluated. Water level
monitoring indicates that the apparent capture of the combined nitrate and chloroform pumping
systems has increased compared to last quarter primarily due to water level declines at nitrate
pumping well TW4-25 and chloroform pumping wells MW-26, TW4-19 and TW4-20. Capture
associated with nitrate pumping wells is developing and is expected to increase over time as
water levels decline due to pumping and to cessation of water delivery to the n01thern wildlife
ponds. Furthermore, the evaluation of the long term interaction between nitrate and chloroform
pumping systems will require more data to be collected as part of routine monitoring. Slow
development of hydraulic capture by the nitrate pumping system is consistent with, and expected
based on the relatively low permeability of the perched zone at the site. Definition of capture
associated with the nitrate pumping system will also be influenced by the perched groundwater
mound and the apparently anomalously low water level at TWN-7.
Current pumping is likely sufficient to eventually capture the entire nitrate plume upgradient of
TW4-22 and TW4-24. Pumping during the current quarter exceeds the estimated pre-pumping
('background') rate of perched water flow through the nitrate plume by a factor between
approximately 1.1 and 2.4. Because the pre-pumping flow calculations likely overestimate the
new 'background' conditions caused by reduced recharge from the northern wildlife ponds, and
because the average plume hydraulic conductivity estimate from the low end of the calculated
range is likely to be more representative of actual conditions, nitrate pumping may exceed flow
through the plume by a factor greater than 2.4.
First quarter, 2014 nitrate concentrations at many of the wells within and adjacent to the nitrate
plume were within 20% of the values reported during the previous quarter, suggesting that
variations are within the range typical for sampling and analytical error. Changes in
concentration greater than 20% occurred in wells MW-26, TWN-3, TWN-7, TW4-16, TW4-20,
and TW4-25,. The concentrations in wells MW-11, MW-25, and MW-32 remained non-detect.
Of the wells showing changes in concentration greater than 20%, MW-26 and TW4-20 are
chloroform pumping wells and TW4-25 is a nitrate pumping well. TW4-16 is located adjacent to
chloroform pumping well MW -26 and TWN-3 is located adjacent to nitrate pumping well TWN-
2. Nitrate concentration fluctuations at pumping wells and adjacent wells likely result in part
from the effects of pumping.
The nitrate concentration in nitrate pumping well TW4-25 decreased from approximately 2.2
mg/L last quarter to 1.2 mg!L this quarter. The nitrate concentrations in chloroform pumping
24
wells MW-26 and TW4-20 decreased from approximately 2.1 mg/L and 7.6 mg/L, respectively,
to approximately 0.9 mg/L and 6.0 mg/L. Chloroform concentrations at nitrate pumping wells
TW4-22 and TW4-24 increased from 12,100 flg/L to 12,400 flg/L and decreased from 78.5 flg/L
ti 62.7 flg/L, respectively. The decrease at TW4-24 brought the chloroform plume boundary back
to the east of TW4-24. Chloroform changes are likely in response to the start-up of nitrate
pumping in the first quarter of 2013 and are affected by the presence of historically high
chloroform concentrations at adjacent, cross-gradient well TW4-20
Changes in nitrate concentrations at wells within the nitrate plume since the last quarter have
resulted in a slight overall shrinkage of the plume area. The northeastern extent of the plume has
been reduced, primarily due to decreases in concentrations at TW4-19, TW4-20, TW4-25 and
TW4-22. MW-27, located west of TWN-2, and TWN-18, located north of TWN-3, bound the
nitrate plume to the west and north (See Figure I-1 under Tab I). In addition, the southernmost
(downgradient) boundary of the plume remains between MW-30/MW-31 and MW-5/MW-11.
Nitrate concentrations at MW-5 (adjacent to MW-11) and MW-11 have historically been low(<
1 mg/L) or non-detect for nitrate (See Table 5). MW-25, MW-26, MW-32, TW4-16, TW4-19,
TW4-20, TW4-25, TWN-1, and TWN-4 bound the nitrate plume to the east.
Nitrate concentrations at MW -30 and MW -31 continue to be relatively stable, suggesting that
plume migration is minimal or absent. Nitrate in MW-30 decreased from 18.4 mg/L to 17.9 mg/L
and nitrate in MW-31 increased from 20.6 mg/L to 23.3 mg/L. Changes in both wells were less
than 20% suggesting the changes are within the range typical for sampling and analytical error.
Based on the concentration data at MW-5, MW-11, MW-30, and MW-31, the nitrate plume is
under control.
Chloride has been relatively stable at MW -30 but appears to be increasing at MW -31. The
apparent increase in chloride and stable nitrate at MW-31 suggests a natural attenuation process
that is affecting nitrate but not chloride. A likely process that would degrade nitrate but leave
chloride unaffected is reduction of nitrate by pyrite. The likelihood of this process in the perched
zone is discussed in HGC, December 7 2012; Investigation of Pyrite in the Perched Zone, White
Mesa Uranium Mill Site, Blanding, Utah.
Nitrate mass removal by pumping and natural attenuation (expected to result primarily from
pyrite oxidation/nitrate reduction) act to lower nitrate mass within the plume. Changes resulting
from redistribution of nitrate within the plume are expected to result in both increases and
decreases in concentrations at wells within the plume and therefore increases and decreases in
mass estimates based on those concentrations, thus generating 'noise' in the mass estimates.
Furthermore, because the sum of sampling and analytical error is typically about 20%, changes
in the mass estimates from quarter to quarter of up to 20% could result from typical sampling
and analytical error alone. Only longer-term analyses of the mass estimates that minimize the
impact of these quarter to quarter variations will provide useful information on plume mass
trends. Over the long term, nitrate mass estimates are expected to trend downward as a result of
direct removal by pumping and through natural attenuation.
As specified in the CAP, once eight quarters of data have been collected (starting with the first
quarter of 2013), a regression trend line will be applied to the quarterly mass estimates and
evaluated. The trend line will then be updated quarterly and reevaluated as additional quarters of
25
data are collected. The evaluation will determine whether the mass estimates are increasing,
decreasing, or stable.
During the current quarter, a total of approximately 102 lb of nitrate was removed by the
chloroform pumping wells and by nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-
2. Of the 102 lb removed during the current quarter, approximately 92 lb, (or 90 %), was
removed by the nitrate pumping wells.
The baseline nitrate (nitrate+nitrite as N) plume mass calculated as specified in the CAP (based
on second quarter, 2010 data) was approximately 43,700 lb. The nitrate plume mass estimate for
the current quarter was calculated as 30,620 lb which was lower than the previous quarter's
estimate of 31,410 lb by 790 lb or less than 3%. Part of this difference may result from slightly
lower nitrate concentrations measured some wells within the plume this quarter compared to last
quarter, especially TW4-22, which decreased from approximately 54.6 mg!L to 47.2 mg/L.
Nitrate concentrations outside the nitrate plume exceed 10 mg!L at a few locations: TW 4-10
(13.9 mg!L), TW4-12 (17.0 mg!L), TW4-18 (12.2 mg!L), TW4-26 (12.5 mg!L), TW4-27 (31.1
mg!L), and TW4-28 (16.5 mg!L). All these wells are located southeast of the nitrate plume as
defined in the CAP and all are separated from the plume by wells having nitrate concentrations
that are either non-detect, or, if detected, are less than 10 mg!L. Concentrations at TW4-10,
TW4-12, TW4-18, TW4-26, TW4-27 and TW4-28 are within 20% of their concentrations during
the previous quarter. Elevated nitrate at TW4-10 and TW4-18 is associated with the chloroform
plume and is within the capture zone of the chloroform pumping system. Elevated nitrate at
TW4-12, TW4-26, TW4-27, and TW4-28 is likely related to former cattle ranching operations at
the site. Increases in both nitrate and chloride concentrations at wells near the northern wildlife
ponds are anticipated as a result of reduced dilution caused by cessation of water delivery to the
northern wildlife ponds. An overall decrease in nitrate concentrations at these wells this quarter
(after a previously generally increasing trend) suggests that conditions in these areas are
stabilizing.
Nitrate mass removal from the perched zone increased substantially by the start-up of nitrate
pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 during the first quarter of 2013.
Continued operation of these wells is therefore recommended. Pumping these wells, regardless
of any short term fluctuations in concentrations detected at the wells, helps to reduce
downgradient nitrate migration by removing nitrate mass and reducing average hydraulic
gradients, thereby allowing natural attenuation to be more effective. Continued operation of the
nitrate pumping system is expected to eventually reduce nitrate concentrations within the plume
and to further reduce or halt downgradient nitrate migration.
EFRI and its consultants have raised the issues and potential effects associated with cessation of
water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds in March, 2012 during discussions with DRC in
March 2012 and May 2013. While past recharge from the ponds has helped limit many
constituent concentrations within the chloroform and nitrate plumes by dilution, the associated
groundwater mounding has increased hydraulic gradients and contributed to plume migration.
Since use of the northern wildlife ponds ceased in March 2012, the reduction in recharge and
decay of the associated groundwater mound is expected to increase many constituent
26
concentrations within the plumes while reducing hydraulic gradients and rates of plume
migration.
The net impact of reduced wildlife pond recharge is expected to be beneficial even though it is
also expected to result in higher concentrations that will persist until continued mass reduction
via pumping and natural attenuation ultimately reduce concentrations. Temporary increases in
nitrate concentrations are judged less important than reduced nitrate migration rates. The actual
impacts of reduced recharge on concentrations and migration rates will be defined by continued
monitoring.
8.0 ELECTRONIC DATA FILES AND FORMAT
EFRI has provided to the Director an electronic copy of all laboratory results for groundwater
quality monitoring conducted under the nitrate contaminant investigation during the Quarter, in
Comma Separated Values ("CSV") format. A copy of the transmittal e-mail is included under
Tab L.
27
9.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION
This document was prepared by Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. on August 18, 2014.
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
By:
Frank Filas, P .E
Vice President, Permitting and Environmental Affairs
28
Certification:
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared
under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified
personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the
person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,
and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.
d!dt
Frank Filas, P.E
Vice President, Permitting and Environmental Affairs
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
29
Table 1
Summary of Well Sampling and Constituents for the Period
~u l ample-CeU~tion Date
Piezometer 01 517/2014
Piezometer 02 517/2014
Piezometer 03 517/2014
TWN-01 5/6/2014
TWN-02 517/2014
TWN-03 517/2014
TWN-04 5/6/2014
TWN-07 517/2014
TWN-07R 5/6/2014
TWN-18 5/6/2014
TW4-22 5/19/2014
TW4-24 5/19/2014
TW4-25 5/19/2014
TWN-60 5/8/2014
TW4-60 5/27/2014
TWN-65 5/6/2014
Note: All wells were sampled for Nitrate and Chloride.
TWN-60 is a DI Field Blank.
TWN-65 is a duplicate of TWN-04.
TW4-60 is the chl oroform program DI Field Blank.
Continuously pumped well.
Date .of Lab Re_port
5/20/2014
5/20/2014
5/20/2014
5/20/2014
5/20/2014
5/20/2014
5/20/2014
5/20/2014
5/20/2014
5/20/2014
6/5/2014
6/5/2014
6/5/2014
5/20/2014
6/5/2014
5/20/2014
Table 2
Nitrate Mass Removal Per Well Per Quarter
MW-4 TW4-19 TW4-20 f TW4-4 TW4-22 TW4·24 1 TW4-25 TWN-02 Quarter Totals
Quarter (lbs.) MW-26 (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.)
Q3 2010 3.2 0.3 5.8 1.7 4.7 NA NA NA NA 15.7
Q4 2010 3.8 0.4 17.3 1.4 5.1 NA NA NA NA 28.0
Q1 2011 2.9 0.2 64.5 1.4 4.3 NA NA NA NA 73.3
Q2 2011 3.5 0.1 15.9 2.7 4.7 NA NA NA NA 27.0
Q3 2011 3.5 0.5 3.5 3.9 5.4 NA NA NA NA 16.8
Q4 2011 3.8 0.8 6.2 2.5 6.4 NA NA NA NA 19.7
Q1 2012 3.6 0.4 0.7 5.0 6.0 NA NA NA NA 15.9
Q2 2012 3.7 0.6 3.4 2.1 5.2 NA NA NA NA 15.0
Q3 2012 3.8 0.5 3.6 2.0 4.7 NA NA NA NA 14.7
Q4 2012 3.2 0.4 5.4 1.8 4.2 NA NA NA NA 14.9
Q1 2013 2.5 0.4 14.1 1.4 3.6 8.1 43.4 7.5 14.8 95.7
Q2 2013 2.5 0.5 5.6 1.7 3.5 10.7 37.1 6.4 23.9 91.7
Q3 2013 3.0 0.4 48.4 1.4 3.8 6.3 72.8 6.9 33.4 176.5
Q4 2013 3.1 0.3 15.8 1.6 3.9 9.4 75.2 6.4 46.3 162.1
Q1 2014 2.7 0.4 4.1 1.2 3.6 11.2 60.4 2.3 17.2 103.1
Q2 2014 2.4 0.3 3.3 0.9 3.0 9.5 63.4 1.3 17.8 101.87
Well Totals (pounds) 51.3 6.6 217.6 32.7 72.1 55.2 352.3 30.9 153.3 972.0
Table 3 Nitrate Well Pumping Rates and Volumes
Volume of Water Pumped
Pumping Well Name During the Quarter (gals) Average Pump Rate (gpm)
MW-4 71,934.9 4.39
MW-26 23,757.5 10.08
TW4-4 60,235.3 7.88
TW4-19 297,660.0 17.67
TW4-20 18,462.4 9.51
TW4-22 24 193.9 18.49
TW4-24 216,984.1 17.78
TW4-25 124,829.8 18.05
TWN-2 47,611.9 18.5
Table4
Table 4 Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
MW-4 MW-26 -
' I Total
Total Total Pumped Total Total Total Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total
Quarter Pumped (gal) Cone (mgll) Cone(~) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds) (gal) ~; (mgll) (ugll) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) . (pounds)
-
Total Gallons
pumped for Total
the quarter Total pumped Total grams/453. I Calculations from the Concentration Concentration gallons/3. 785 Concentration ug/1000000 592 to
and Data Flow Meter from the in mg/LX1000 to to conver to in ug/L X total to convert to convert to
Origination data analytical data convert to ugll liters liters grams pounds
Q3 2010 79859.1 4.8 4800 302266.7 1450880129 1450.9 3.20 63850.0 0.6 600 241672.3 145003350 145 0.32
Q4 2010 90042.2 5 5000 340809.7 1704048635 1704.0 3.76 60180.0 0.7 700 227781.3 159446910 159 0.35
Q12011 76247.6 4.6 4600 288597.2 1327546964 1327.5 2.93 55130.0 0.5 500 208667.1 104333525 104 0.23
Q2 2011 85849.3 4.9 4900 324939.6 1592204042 1592.2 3.51 55800.6 0.3 300 211205.3 63361581 63 0.14
Q3 2011 85327.7 4.9 4900 322965.3 1582530188 1582.5 3.49 65618.0 0.9 900 248364.1 223527717 224 0.49
Q4 2011 89735.0 5.1 5100 339647.0 1732199573 1732.2 3.82 50191.3 2 2000 189974.1 379948141 380 0.84
Q1 2012 90376.4 4.8 4800 342074.7 1641958435 1642.0 3.62 31440.1 1.7 1700 119000.8 202301323 202 0.45
Q2 2012 90916.5 4.9 4900 344118.8 1686181940 1686.2 3.72 26701.2 2.5 2500 101064.1 252660294 253 0.56
Q3 2012 91607.0 5 5000 346732.5 1733662475 1733.7 3.82 25246.0 2.6 2600 95556.1 248445886 248 0.55
Q4 2012 78840.0 4.8 4800 298409.4 1432365120 1432.4 3.16 30797.0 1.46 1460 116566.6 170187302 170 0.38
Q12013 62943.7 4.78 4780 238241.9 1138796304 1138.8 2.51 22650.7 2.27 2270 85732.9 194613682 195 0.43
Q2 2013 71187.3 4.22 4220 269443.9 1137053387 1137.1 2.51 25343.4 2.11 2110 95924.8 202401263 202 0.45
Q3 2013 72898.8 4.89 4890 275922.0 1349258375 1349.3 2.97 25763.0 1.98 1980 97513.0 193075651 193 0.43
Q4 2013 70340.4 5.25 5250 266238.4 1397751674 1397.8 3.08 24207.6 1.38 1380 91625.8 126443557 126 0.28
Q1 2014 69833.8 4.7 4700 264320.9 1242308385 1242.3 2.74 23263.1 2.12 2120 88050.8 186667767 187 0.41
Q2 2014 71934.9 4.08 4080 272273.6 1110876274 1110.9 2.45 23757.5 1.42 1420 89922.1 127689435 128 0.28
Totals Since Q3
2010 1277939.65 51.28 609939.5 6.57
Highlighted cells are the total for the current quarter
Table 4
Table 4 Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
TW4-19 TW4-20
I . , .
' I
TotaiPum~ Cone Cone Total Pumped Total Total Total Pumped Cone Cone Total Pumped Total Total
Quarter (gal) (mgll) (ug/L) (liters) Total (ugt (grams) (pounds) (gal) (mg/L) (ug/L) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds)
II
I I I, lr I
Calculations II I I
and Data II
Origination
Q3 2010 116899.2 5.9 5900 442463.5 2.611E+{)9 2611 5.76 39098.3 5.3 5300 147987.1 784331447 784 1.73
Q4 2010 767970.5 2.7 2700 2906768.3 7.848E+09 7848 17.30 36752.5 4.6 4600 139108.2 639897778 640 1.41
Q12011 454607.9 17 17000 1720690.9 2.925E+10 29252 64.49 37187.5 4.4 4400 140754.7 619320625 619 1.37
Q2 2011 159238.9 12 12000 602719.2 7.233E+09 7233 15.95 67907.7 4.8 4800 257030.6 1.234E+09 1234 2.72
Q3 2011 141542.6 3 3000 535738.7 1.607E+09 1607 3.54 72311.2 6.5 6500 273697.9 1.779E+09 1779 3.92
Q4 2011 147647.2 5 5000 558844.7 2.794E+09 2794 6.16 72089.3 4.2 4200 272858.0 1.146E+09 1146 2.53
Q12012 148747.0 0.6 600 563007.4 337804437 338 0,74 76306.0 7.9 7900 288818.2 2.282E+09 2282 5.03
Q2 2012 172082.0 2.4 2400 651330.5 1.563E+09 1563 3.45 22956.4 11 11000 86890.1 955790963 956 2.11
Q3 2012 171345.0 2,5 2500 648540.8 1.621E+09 1621 3.57 22025.0 10.8 10800 83364.6 900337950 900 1.98
Q4 2012 156653.0 4.1 4100 592931.6 2.431E+09 2431 5.36 20114.0 11 11000 76131.5 837446390 837 1.85
Q1 2013 210908,0 7.99 7990 798286.8 6,378E+09 6378 14"06 18177.0 9.07 9070 68799.9 624015501 624 1.38
Q2 2013 226224.0 2.95 2950 856257.8 2.526E+09 2526 5.57 20252.4 9.76 9760 76655.3 748156060 748 1.65
Q3 2013 329460.1 17.6 17600 1247006.5 2.195E+10 21947 48.39 19731.0 8.65 8650 74681.8 645997873 646 1.42
Q4 2013 403974.0 4.7 4700 1529041.6 7.186E+09 7186 15.84 19280.2 9.64 9640 72975.6 703484369 703 1.55
Q12014 304851.0 1.62 1620 1153861.0 1.869E+09 1869 4.12 18781.6 7.56 7560 71088.4 537427971 537 1.18
Q2 2014 297660.0 1.34 1340 1126643.1 1.51E+09 1510 3.33 18462.4 5.95 5950 69880.2 415787095 416 0.92 --
Totals Since Q3
2010 4209810.4 217.63 581432.5 32.74
Highlighted cells are the total for the current quarter
Table4
Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
-· TW4-4 ~ TW4-22
II
Total Total Total Total
Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total
Quarter (gal) I (mg/L) . (ug/L) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds) (gal) (mgfl) (ug/L) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds) I
!I -I I I I'
I I I
fl
Calculations I
I' and Data I 'I I
Origination ' Q3 2010 76916.8 7.30 7300.00 291130.1 2.1E+09 2125.25 4.69 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA I
Q4 2010 86872.1 7.10 7100.00 328810.9 2.3E+09 2334.56 5.15 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA !
Q12011 73360.0 7.00 7000.00 277667.6 1.9E+09 1943.67 4.29 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q2 2011 80334.6 7.00 7000_00 304066.5 2.1E+09 2128.47 4.69 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q3 2011 97535.0 6.60 6600.00 369170.0 2.4E+09 2436.52 5.37 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA I
Q4 2011 109043.5 7.00 7000.00 412729.6 2.9E+09 2889.11 6.37 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q12012 101616.8 7.10 7100.00 384619.6 2.7E+09 2730.80 6.02 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q2 2012 87759.1 7.10 7100.00 332168.2 2.4E+09 2358.39 5.20 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA I
Q3 2012 80006.0 7.10 7100.00 302822.7 2.2E+09 2150.04 4.74 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q4 2012 71596.0 7.00 7000.00 270990.9 1.9E+09 1896.94 4.18 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q1 2013 58716.8 7.36 7360.00 222243.1 1.6E+09 1635,71 3.61 16677.4 58.0 58000.0 63124.0 3661189622.0 3661.2 8.07
Q2 2013 65603.4 6.30 6300.00 248308.9 1.6E+09 1564.35 3.45 25523.2 50.2 50200.0 96605.3 4849586662.4 4849.6 10.69
Q3 2013 63515.4 7.22 7220.00 240405.8 1.7E+09 1735.73 3.83 25592.9 29.7 29700.0 96869.1 2877013057.1 2877.0 6.34
Q4 2013 60233.6 7.84 7840.00 227984.2 1.8E+09 1787.40 3.94 24952.2 45.2 45200.0 94444.1 4268872280.4 4268.9 9.41
Q12014 58992.9 7.28 7280.00 223288.1 1.6E+09 1625.54 3.58 24532.0 54.6 54600.0 92853.6 5069807652.0 5069.8 11.18
Q2 2014 60235.3 5.91 5910.00 227990.6 1.3E+09 1347.42 2.97 24193.9 47.2 47200.0 91573.9 4322288622.8 4322.3 ~
Totals Since Q3
2010 1232337.3 72.07 141471.6 55.22
Highlighted cells are the total for the current quarter
Table4
Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
TW4-24 TW4-25 '
Total Total Total I Total I Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total
Quarter (gal) (mg/L) (ug/L) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds) (gal) (mgll) (ug/L) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds)
')
Calculations
and Data
Origination J
Q3 2010 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q4 2010 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q12011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q2 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q3 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q4 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q12012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q2 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q3 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q4 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q12013 144842.6 35.9 35900.0 548229.2 19681429751.9 19681.4 43.39 99369.9 9.0 9000.0 376115.1 3385035643.5 3385.0 7.46
Q2 2013 187509.3 23.7 23700.0 709722.7 16820428001.9 16820.4 37.08 147310.4 5.2 5240.0 557569.9 2921666087.4 2921.7 6.44
Q3 2013 267703.5 32.6 32600.0 1013257.7 33032202568.5 33032.2 72.82 145840.9 5.69 5690.0 552007.8 3140924419.0 3140.9 6.92
Q4 2013 260555.3 34.6 34600.0 986201.8 34122582643.3 34122.6 75.23 126576.5 6.10 6100.0 479092.1 2922461520.3 2922.5 6.44
Q12014 229063.9 31.6 31600.0 867006.9 27397416823.4 27397.4 60.40 129979.2 2.16 2160.0 491971.3 1062657947.5 1062.7 2.34
Q2 2014 216984.1 35.0 35000.0 821284.8 28744968647.5 28745.0 63.37 124829.8 1.21 1210.0 472480.8 571701759.5 571.7 1.26
Totals Since Q3
2010 1306658.7 352.30 773906.7 30.87
Highlighted cells are the total for the current quarter
Table 4
Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
TWN-o2
Total
Removed
Total Total by All
Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total Wells
Quarter (gal) (mg/L) (ug/L) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds) (pounds)
J ij
I
Calculations .
and Data u
Origination -
Q3 2010 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 15.69
Q4 2010 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 27.97
Q12011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 73.30
Q2 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 27.01
Q3 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 16.82
Q4 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 19.71
Q1 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 15.86
Q22012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 15.03
Q3 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 14.67
Q4 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 14.92
Q12013 31009.4 57.3 57300.0 117370.6 6725334176.7 6725.3 14.83 95.73
Q2 2013 49579.3 57.7 57700.0 187657.7 10827846433.9 10827.8 23.87 91.71
Q3 2013 50036.5 80.0 80000.0 189388.2 15151052200.0 15151.1 33.40 176.53
Q4 2013 49979.9 111.0 111000.0 189173.9 20998305286.5 20998.3 46.29 162.07
Q12014 48320.4 42.6 42600.0 182892.7 7791229616.4 7791.2 17.18 103.14
Q2 2014 47611.9 44.7 44700.0 180211.0 8055433555.1 8055.4 17.76 101.87
Totals Since Q3
2010 276537.4 153.33 972.02
Highlighted cells are the total for the current quarter
Q2
Lq_c_ati_a~ -iQI0
1\f.Wi-._~:o 15.8
'MW~f 22.5
-~W-S ND
MW-n ND
ND = Not detected
NS = Not Sampled
Table 5
Nitrate Data Over Time for MW-30, MW-31, MW-5, and MW-11
·Q3 Q4 '(Q l Q2 Q3 'Q4 Ql Q2 ·.Q3 Q4
2Q.J;O 2llt'd 2Clll . lOll 10"lll 20JJ 2012 2.6.1'2 2012 201'2
15 16 16 17 16 16 17 16 17 18.5
21 20 21 22 21 21 21 20 21 23.6
NS 0.2 NS 0.2 NS 0.2 NS 0.1 NS ND
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Q'l .Q2 Q$ ~ ~I Q2
20 13~ . 2~W3 201 ~ 1013 -2~H4 2Gl4
21.4 18.8 17.6 19.5 18.4 19.4
19.3 23.8 21.7 23.9 20.6 23 .1
NS ND NS 0.279 NS ND
ND ND ND ND ND ND
TABLE6
Slug Test Results
(Using KGS Solution and Automatically Logged Data)
Well K
lcm/s)
MW-30 1.0E-04
MW-31 7.1 E-05
TW4-22 1.3E-04
TW4-24 1.6E-04
TW4-25 5.8E-05
TWN-2 1.5E-05
TWN-3 8.6E-06
Average 1
Average2
Average3
Average 4
Notes:
Average 1 = arlthemetic average of all wells
Average 2 =geometric average of all wells
K
(ftldavl
0.28
0.20
0.36
0.45
0.16
0.042
0.024
0.22
0.15
0.32
0.31
Average 3 = arlthemetic average of MW-30, MW-31, TW4-22, and TW4·24
Average 4 =geometric average of MW-30, MW-31, TW4·22, and TW4·24
cmls = centimeters per second
ft/day = feet per day
K = hydraulic conductivity
KGS = KGS Unconfined Slug Test Solution In Aqteso/ve TM .
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Raport\2014 01\FiowCalcs ·Tables 6·7·8: Table 6
TABLE 7
Pre-Pumping Saturated Thicknesses
Depth to Depth to Water Saturated Thickness
Well Brushy Basin Fourth Quarter, 2012 Above Brushy Basin
(ft) (ft) (ft)
TW4-22 112 53 58
TW4-24 110 55 55
Notes:
ft =feet
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2014 01\FiowCalcs-Tables 6-7-8: Table 7
TABLE 8
Pre-Pumping Hydraulic Gradients and Flow Calculations
Pathllne Boundaries
Path Length Head Change Hydraulic Gradient
(ft) (ft) (ftlft)
TW4-25 to MW-31 2060 48 0.023
TWN-2 to MW-30 2450 67 0.027
average 0.025
1 min flow (gpm) 1.31
2 max flow (gpm) 2.79
Notes:
It= feet
ft!ft = feet per foot
gpm = gallons per minute
1 assumes width = 1 ,200ft; saturated thickness =56ft; K = 0.15 ft/day; and gradient= 0.025 ft/ft
2 assumes width = 1 ,200ft; saturated thickness = 56 ft; K = 0.32 ft/day; and gradient = 0.025 ft/ft
N:\WMM\Required ReportsWitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2014 01\FiowCalcs-Tables 6-7-8: Table 8
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
Tab B Order of Sampling and Field Data Worksheets
Tab C Kriged Current Quarter Groundwater Contour Map, Capture Zone Map, Capture Zone Details
Map, and Weekly, Monthly and Quarterly Depth to Water Data
Tab D Kriged Previous Quarter Groundwater Contour Map
Tab E Hydrographs of Groundwater Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab F Depths to Groundwater and Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab G Laboratory Analytical Reports
Tab H Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
H-1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation
H-2 Holding Time Evaluation
H-3 Analytical Method Check
H-4 Reporting Limit Evaluation
H-5 QAJQ!:-Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
H-6 QC Control Limits for Analyses and Blanks
H-7 Receipt Temperature Evaluation
H-8 Rinsate Evaluation
Tab I Kriged Current Quarter Isoconcentration Maps
Tab J Analyte Concentration Data Over Time
Tab K Concentration Trend Graphs
Tab L CSV Transmittal Letter
Tab A
Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
TW4-19
EB
MW-5 •
TW4-12
0
TWN-7
~
PIEZ-1
perched chloroform or
nitrate pumping well
perched monitoring well
temporary perched monitoring well
temporary perched nitrate monitoring
well
Q perched piezometer
TW4-32
~
TW4-35
¢
temporary perched monitoring well
installed September, 2013
temporary perched monitoring well
installed May, 2014
RUIN SPRING
b seep or spring
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
mM-1111 ~'
WHITE MESA SITE PLAN SHOWING LOCATIONS OF
PERCHED WELLS AND PIEZOMETERS
APPftOIIEb DATE REFERENCE FIGURE
H:/718000/aug 14/Uwelloc0614.srf A-1
TabB
Order of Sampling and Field Data Worksheets
Nitrate
Mg/l
Previous
Nitrate Samples
Name Qrt. Date/Purge sample
TWN-7 0.882
TWN-4 1.41
TWN-1 1.47
TWN-18 2.33
TWN-3 19.6
TWN-2 42.6
Duplicate of ,--,v,U-c•i
Rinsate
01 Sample -f..J A)... b!l
Plez1
Plez2
Plez3
6.79
0.169
1.7
S/7/1"1
1 ~/C,/I'j
S.ft./1'"/
!sJG.Il'"/
l'!:l/7.'1'1_
!:::./111'1
~f?li't
::.171 lq
.5/7/1"1
"'?2-1
O:t.":!:i..'l
oqs=,
IOZ.l<
0~,;
D'tS''-10
0730
0·133
C!l.-:.'!1
occ;g
Nitrate Order
Z.Jtist Quarter 2014
Depth Total Depth
105
125.7
112.5
145
96
96
Rlnsate Samples
Name Date Sample·
TWN·7R I slc../1'-i DTS7
TWN-4R
TWN-lR
TWN·lBR
TWN·3R
TWN-2R
Samplers:
Mill -Groundwater Discharse Permit Date: 01>-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Grou':o~water" M~nitoring Quality Assurance Plan IOAPI
ATIAOHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL See inslruction
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I :z..".,\ Qv..c..' ter /U tr¥\t~ 2.0 i't
Sampler Name
Location (well name): I p; G 'Z.-0 1 and initials: I ~nn~.-l,frJ II1'J" !1 l :rff
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging ._I =-s-'/"-. 7.;..;/_z._o_f'-"1'-------'
Well Purging Equip Used: !mpump or ~ bailer
Purging Method Used: Is l2 casings [9]3 casings
and Sampling (if different) .__,.v.;'-rt.;..;A'---.:..:....:---=--=-----'
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) ._I ~-~-:A _____ ..:____.
I I p,""z.-o:::. Sampling Event Q. v..c-..rt-e.r~ .N itr(i\t~ Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event ,_ _______ :..:_. _ ___.
pH Buffer 7.0 7 ,0 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance ~....1 _q.:....;'i....:..1 ___ __.I~OS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft):l ._ .::..0 ___ ---1
Depth to Water Before Purging I b-2. 'ID Casing Volume (V) 4" WeJI:~_,o,_ __ -1,(.653h)
3" WelL:_ o _(.367h)
Weather Cond. Ext'! Amb. Temp. •c (prior sampling event)l'-<7..;..." __ ___.
Time I Ci}\"J i. I Gal. Purged I 0 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I z.1qs I pH I 9.'-\7 I Conductance I I pHI .. I ·::_
Temp. oc I 13,4j. I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I l'~'j I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
. Turbidity (NTU) I -~-~'f I Turbidity (NTU) L I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gid. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI •' ·I
Temp. cc I I
'r
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I -I
Temp. cc I I lr Redox Potential Eb (mV) I I I•
Turbidity (NTu) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I I~ --. ..
l'
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater .A 1 of2 Capturx· CDIIPATIILE WITH~uuon.--FUNCTIDNALITV
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Dati!!: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groun'dwa~r M.!ihitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volwne ofWater Purged c gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q). in gpm _
S/60 = I~.--..;;__ __ _~
Time to evacuate lwo casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I (?) I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) lo
Ifwell evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs ~ 0 0 3x40 mJ D D HCL 0 0
Nutrients 1!1 I D lOOml D IE H2S04 (2!1 ' Q I=
Heavy Metals G I 0 ., 250 Ifll Gl D ~ HN03 ~0 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 G 250 rnl D D No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 l,OOOml ~ 0 HN03 ( 0 0
Other (specify) IKJ lrJ Sample volume 0 ~ [] 8l
C. h lo:-,·Jc If preservative is used, spccicy
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
I
' ~ina! Depth ._I _co_:'l_.I"'""J __ __. Sample Time O'l.33
!
! See insrruction
:Conunent
Arr"J~~ of\ site c.,+ C'l ll., -r::_,,~i '-\nc\ 6-.,.rrit~ pf'~,.} h <:G)Ied .5i'l'l1p}~
~~"1 r'~ aeile<:...tcJ ~t-0'133. wcxt~r wo.s, me~ C\eN"". Le.B ;:.d"t: o..+ ocp.~
L---:-----:--~--liDo nottouch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Work5het!t for Groundwater ~ 2 of2 Capturx-CDIIPATiaLE WllH_..-'L-.. .ri:r-FUNCTIQNALITY
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
.
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I "Z..I'l a G:v.~r"ter ...v li"roef~ 'Zb •9
See instruction
Location (well name): ._l ......;..p_; e_-z._-_o_-z. _________ ___.
Sampler Name
and initials: I ~,,e;r fLIJI,J~.h*
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging ._l_.s....:./_7._:_'/_-z_o_l'I.;...._ ____ _J and Sampling (if different) ........-/A ~---------~
Well Purging Equip Used: @]pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) ._I _;v._Y_:.+ ______ _,
Purging Method Used: @]2 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event l G>W1'rl'b"B NA=r~te Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event .__l_--rw __ AJ_-_0z. ______ __,
pH Buffer 7.0 7. tJ pH Buffer 4.0 I q,o
Specific Conductance!,_ _1_'1_1 ____ __.1 ~-tMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft):
Depth to Water Before Purging l 3'-1.1& Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:t_0 ___ -tl(.653h)
3" Well:_ " _(.367h)
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling event)lL--1_0
__ _,~
Time I 08SJ I Gal. Purged I () I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I '670 I pH 1 7.~/ I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. °C I )'Z. .~"7 I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I :313 I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 1.~ I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. °C I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 0 gallon(s}
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I 0
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I {) I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) l,__o ___ ....J
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 1,__0 ___ -J
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ,_1 _o._'N_o.._l __ o._w_~A_I __ _!
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml D 0 HCL 0
Nutrients "E 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2S04 LJ
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250 rn1 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) ro 0 Sample volume 0 J!l 0
G}rlorJe
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth 11.-....!ti_O~, \3=------' Sample Time I 0 KS&
See instruction
Comment
Arr\'J.J. o"' s..t+c:.. ,J-' 0~5~. -r;::,,er q,,J. 6-Mrl., pn:.s.o-rt' -fo C.<llle.cJ--iY:IMrl~ ...
~11\IV)pl~ bD\;~~ 1\n.i Cfll/l~c.tcJ "'+ 085$. w~r W4.S c.JeL\r'. Le--ft ..SI1c o,T "4a6
Piez-02 05-07-2014 Ina not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
.r!J
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I '2-"1. Q"'o.r=+er AJ 1+,.-,..+..,. '2.0 1'-/
1 See instruction
Location (well name): .... I __;f__;i:....e_-r._-_0__;3~----------'
Sampler Name
and initials: l:::=f"~nf1er '/1.,11 ,6~J11t
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging ._I _5_/"_11-z._o_''-l _____ _, and Sampling (if different) ,.///Jr '--------------~
Well Purging Equip Used: (IDpump or []!]bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I #//\ '-------------~
Purging Method Used: @]2 casings @]3 casings
I ~;~z.-oz Sampling Event I Q\1\.o.r-\-~r~ A1 i+rd'-t<. Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event ._ _______________ _.
pH Buffer 7.0 7,() pH Buffer 4.0 I y,o
Specific Conductance ._l_'1_'l_f ____ _.l~-tMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): Ll _0 ____ ___,
Depth to Water Before Purging I L}S,SO Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:' : ,(.653h)
3" Well:!-. "fJ ----1.(.367h)
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. ·c (prior sampling event)LI _Cf_6
___ _,
Time I 0'117 I Gal. Purged I <) I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I 304& I pH I ) 1.7z:> I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. °C I l :s I 11; I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 'z: 19 I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I Cl.S I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. °C I I Temp. °C I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 0 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = l.__o ___ _.
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T =2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D
Nutrients f) D 100 ml D !:1 H2S04 ~
Heavy Metals D D 250 ml D D HN03 D
All Other Non Radiologies D D 250 mJ D D No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D
Other (specify) g} D Sample volume 0 'tl D
C. h lor;Je If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth].._ _Sl_,_o_4 ___ _. Sample Time
See instruction
Comment
Arrivd Ml s;te ~:),+ O'l 13, -J,.n~r "'"" G-arr;l\ rr~er~+ ~ ccJJ(!d S't""p16 .
~~rtlf~.=::. c.o Jled-d o-t O'fl8. W&~~.t~r VO~A.S Mo.sf(j c:::.ko.r. L-etf S.Jfe .J-O<=jZ5
Piez-03 05-07-2014 I Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
D
D
tJ
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSllEET FOR GROUNDWATER
z.n{}.. QIAo.rf<'r-1\J•"tro-::t.f:: ZD)q
{--., See instruction
Location (well name): .._I ~_w_·_t.J_-_o_I __________ --J
Sampler Name
and initials: ~~f1ner Holl,J~Irit
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I ijJ bh.oJ'-1 ~--------~ and Sampling (if different) 1._/"'-_:..-::_~---------'
Well Purging Equip Used: (IDpump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) ._l6_r ... _,_a_:f_o_s. ____ ...~
Purging Method Used: (QJ2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I QA~>.rterl~ Nrfr.,.."rc Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event ... l_-rw __ JJ_-_0_~-------'
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 4.o
Specific Conductance ._I_"'_Zf9 ____ _.I!!MHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): .._I _l_rz_._.5_o __ _..
Depth to Water Before Purging I S ~,~'I Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:' 3.5:3-:.) ,(.653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) ,__ ___ __,
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. ·c (prior sampling eventl._ll_z._D __ _,
Time lo·4:f52 I Gal. Purged I 6~ I Time j ots~ I Gal. Purged 177 I
Conductance I qJ Y I pH I 1.7..D I Conductance I 'H'f I pH j 7,Z"t. I
Temp. oc I \q. g9 I Temp. oc I 19.g~ I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 3Db I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ~6'1 I
Turbidity (NTU) I -z..s I Turbidity (NTU) I z..7 I
Time 16'159 I Gal. Purged I {)0 I Time ID955 I Gal. Purged ll'j~ I
Conductance 19 ~ I pH 17,Z.3 I Conductance I ~!b I pH I 7.z5 I
Temp. oc 1 r9 .g1 I Temp. oc I H~O I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 3~'Z I Redox Potential Eh (m V) IAOO I :3oo
Turbidity (NTU) 1 27 I Turbidity (NTU) I -z.j I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I Jl.D
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I b ·'iZ. I
j a
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ._I _tf_L\J_I-!).;..1.-______ __,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 1!:1 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2S04 rJ 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250m! 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) fJ 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0 fj
~hloride If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I 1 DY ,i~ g Sample Time o'tsS
See instruction
Comment
A(rive~ on s;fe oct D~l\3 --r;. .... ne:r ""l U:.,cr;.., pf"es~nt .for f""r~c:: '"""i .s~,.....rL~ eved.
'Pv-r~c. he-S~'~ ~+ 044{, ?""r~-c:J w~tll -for .,., +o-h..l oF DJ ,M;, ..... +~.s.
'Pv..r~e efiJe-! MJ. .5o.I"VVp~ col/ec::+~J o..} 0'1~ ~+er v:lctS. mc~t~ C.l<!tA.r
L-e-0-site. (;,_+-o 157
TWN-01 05-06-2014 loo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2 ·Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
DescriptionofSamplingEvent: I 'Z.nzl; Gv.o.rfc.r AJ 1+rih: "Z.OII.f
See instruction
Location (well name): ._1_--r_vJ_Al_-_o_~ _________ _____,
Sampler Name
and initials: r::=r;,.,t:,. }foii •J•.jhH
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging ._l __ 5_}_7_7_z._o_J_'1 ___ __, and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: [f[]pump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: ~2 casings (g]3 casings
Sampling Event I Q \Act.rfe.rfd Jl)i+r;.f<.. Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event l.__li_"0_).)_-_0_3 _____ ___.
pH Buffer 7.0 /,(J pH Buffer 4.0 q.o
Specific Conductance!._ _'1_~~------'1 !!MHOS/ em WellDepth(O.Olft): ~~.00 .__ ____ __,
Depth to Water Before Purging I 2 ~ · Lf 0 Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:' '13, 'iE ,(.653h)
3" Well: o (.367h) .__ ___ __,
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling eventll~111 __ -.~
Time 1 og3~ I Gal. Purged I 0 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I ~187.. I pH I ~.89 I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I IZ.SZ I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I :531 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I Temp. °C I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged (J gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q). in gpm .
s16o =I,__ _,l...._g ....... o __ _.
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 4.&'?-I
()
0
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labsl ._ -'-'At...:vJ..::...:..~A..:L'---------'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y
1VOCs 0 D 3x40 ml 0 D HCL 0
Nutrients 00 0 IOOml D [) H2S04 ~
Heavy Metals 0 D 250 ml D D HN03 0
All Other Non Radio.logics 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. D
Gross Atpha 0 D 1,000 ml 0 D HN03 0
Other (specify) 00 D Sample volume 0 ~ 0
L.hlori~~ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I Sg'. 1/ Sample Time
See instruction
Comment
Aa·ive.~ on ~l+e ~+ 0'6~7. -r;,Mu· """~ 6-Mr;, prese,.,J-to c.o/l<.c.+ ..s.:.,.,pl~
s"'P1f\ej c.ol\ecte~ o..+ ogyo. V)ii+Cr \,)~~ Gle.Gl<"". Lc{1 ~rte. ~:t 08''"/Z.
TWN-02 05-07-2014 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
D
D
D
D
.g)
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I Z."a Q..,. .. ricr .IJ ,:.},....._f e zo1Lf
[:;: See instruction
Location (well name): l.__~_vJ_. _AJ_-_0_3;:;.._ ________ --J
Sampler Name
and initials: 1--r=::,.,>'ler Holl•5k\.'1 /rH
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I .S I'-I zo 19 and Sampling (if different) 5/7/-zo/'1 ~~~~~-----~
Well Purging Equip Used: (IDpump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I Grv.n {)lfa $
Purging Method Used: [1!]2 casings [QJ3 casings
:1: I --rw.AJ-18 Sampling Event I G '-'.o.r-Jed.:1 .1\.1 ;'fr""-te Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event...__ _________ _.
pH Buffer 7.0 7,0
Specific Conductance!._ _1_lJf_Zf ____ _.l ~MHOS/ em
Depth to Water Before Purging I :57.50
Weather Cond.
Time I l?.n I Gal. Purged I Y'1 . Sb I
Conductance I -z.~'-\7 I pH I G,.iS I
Temp. oc I j9.2;~ I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ~rz I
Turbidity (NTU) I ~:s I
Time I OS1>1 I Gal. Purged I 0 I
Conductance 1 2'-102. I pH I ...,,o'-1 I
Temp. oc IJ'Z..T~ I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
pH Buffer 4.0 I Y.O
Well Depth(O.Olft): I q C · oo ,__ ____ _,
Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:l .:3 g. 2 0 ,(.653h)
3" Well: o (.367h) .__ ___ _,
Ext'l Amb. Temp. ·c (prior sampling eventll.___z _o _"' _ _....
Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time 10837. I Gal. Purged I 0 I
Conductance I z.i12~ I pH 17.03 I
Temp. oc 1 \z.go I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate {Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I 11.0
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I b.~'1 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) \.'24
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ._l..t...:/t:-W~It'"'"L-------'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients ~ D 100 ml 0 ~ H2S04 ~
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml D 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiol.ogics 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Al.pha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 D
Other (specify) &I 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0
C hlor;Jc. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth ~.-I -~.'i~Y·~3.w.1 ___ _. Sample Time
See instruction
Comment
Arr:-ve'a Ofl sti~ ~Ai 12oq, ~filler Jill~ {j-q.rr;, pre~,J ~. pv.r~~-p...,.~~
1'vr~~ \,/Jell 4or"' ·h+ ... l oF' 1...\ r>'\:,11\-t~ Mr}., 30 S~fl~~ w~+~r 1.001..5 ~
'Pu..r~~ wc.l\ J.r~. L~~ site ""+-12.20 .
fr((-:\'J~~ O(\ ~J-k o.+ 08Z7 -!,.Me.,... o."J. G-e1o..r-r:"' pr~en+ 16 6 .... :1 01,...J,. collec+-.s.""""'PJ~s.
'Dep+h +() WO·+<:r wo..~ 37,11 S..o-Mrl~ bo.;leJ .,..+-08'31 Le.-A-~·+c. o-+ Of33
TWN-03 05-06-2014 !Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
D
D
D
D
iJ
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I 2.fla G v.~ ri"er J1J 1 ff ,.f~ -z.Oll/
See instruction
Location (well name): l._i-'-'-W...:..!V_--=0-='-1'---------------'
Sampler Name
and initials: -;;.,mer Holl/Jtj )fit
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging ._I..:::S...,~c..:.:b::..:/....;;z.;;...;o...:.l...:..'i _____ _, and Sampling (if different) _,./ / Pr ~-~-------~
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I 6-f iAfl J\fo ~
Purging Method Used: 002 casings {Q]3 casings
Sampling Event Q\JI."'rt~r B A),+r,.fc.. Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event I f4W'"---rvJN-Ol
pH Buffer 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0
TwA> -o7
Y.o
Specific Conductance I._,'-1-'~-----'I!!MHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft):
Depth to Water Before Purging I 50 . b5 Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:' '--1 'f, 00 ,(.653h)
3" Wcll:L.-....:...o __ ___,_ (.367h)
Weather Cond. Ext'( Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling eventl._l .:...;.10_" __ _,
Time I 0~32 I Gal. Purged I 1~ I Time I o~~3 I Gal. Purged 1110 I
Conductance I 107~ I pH 17.7.0 I Conductance I to'Jll I pH 17.13 I
Temp. °C I \'-ti'3 I Temp. oc IJLl , 71 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I -z~-z I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I z.88 I
Turbidity (NTU) I ~3 I TurbiaitY. (NTU) I '1V I
Time I o8-:;4 I Gal. Purged I rzl I Time l o8'35 I Gal. Purged 1 13~ I
Conductance l to-7~ I pH I7.J7 I Conductance I 101z. I pH l 7.tz I
Temp. °C I J•-1. 7"2. I Temp. oc I J"'·7 Z I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 'Z-87. I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I Z!s'Y I
Turbidity (NTU) I '14 I Turbidity (NTU) 1 1~ I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon{s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q). in gpm_ Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I I ).0 T=2V/Q= I g .9) I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other th an two) IJ
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Type of Sample
y
VOCs 0
Nutrients [l9
Heavy Metals 0
All Other Non Radio logies 0
Gross Alpha 0
Other (specify) rB
C~lor;Je.
Final Depth ._I .S_I ._z_s ___ _,
Comment
flrr ;vetX on 5•~e. ,.+ D~l g
f b t D8Z3 V.f"fjt!. ~f!:fl'l (/1..
Pv..r~c e.flJec\ t111l).. .S~1'1fle..s
L~tr s.+~ ~t og'3'7
if other than as
N specified below) y N
0 3x40 ml
0 IOOml
0 250ml
0 250m]
D 1,000 ml
0 Sample volume
Sample Time
-(.,.~,cr 0\fl~ 6-111rr ;,.
Yu.r~cc). v-)1!1) -for fA
c..o }/ e c.:tc: J ,.;)-0 ff:~ 5
0 D
0 ~
0 D
0 D
0 D
0 lbJ
f. re s.et1-J -For
"tot" I of 1-z.
lJ0 ~1(r wa.s
TWN-04 05-06-2014 lDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Preservative Type Preservative Added
y
HCL D
H2S04 ~
HN03 D
No Preserv. D
HN03 0
D
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
~ See instruction
f"'r~~ ~,.,~ ..s~mf ,,J ~ve l'1t .
,M .-f\ v.+c-.s.
N
D
0
D
D
0
18'1
"-\:HI.: "";Jk~ ~l-;f<-Jodk;~
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2 -Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
DescriptionofSamplingEvent: I Q v.o.r'TerQ) N •+r«*"e ZOJL{ znJ: Qv.o.r+u-
1 See instruction
Location (well name): L.l -r_w_tJ_-_0_7 _________ __.
Sampler Name
and initials: r==r;."n~r fl o 11 ·J~}f~
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I ~/(;/z.o•i and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: [!1]pump or @] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: ~2 casings [!!)3 casings
Sampling Event I Qv\M'+~rl,j 1\J;fn,.f<. Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event l -rw.IJ-07 R.
pH Buffer 7.0 L.l_7_.o_. ___ _. pH Buffer 4.0 1 4.o
Specific Conductance IL.-'1-~_1 ____ -.~I~-tMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): \O.S ,00
Depth to Water Before Purging I $ b.3D Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:l 12. .'2) ,(.653h)
3"' Well;,___ o ___ __,_ (.367h)
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. ·c (prior sampling eventll~.-10_' __ _.J
Time I o-,~ I Gal. Purged I J,,SD I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I )'2 "(. I pH I 7.1S I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I 15,0\ I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I z.7'f> I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 21.~ I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time IOS''ll I Gal. Purged I () I Time I og:zz: I Gal. Purged 1 25 I
Conductance I 1 -z-::> j I pH I ".ZJ& I Conductance ll'Z..3~ I pH 17.61 I
Temp. oc 112.~5 I Temp. oc l 17...1.f0 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
A-F+er
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1'---'-/b_• 5_o ___ __, gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q)~ in gpm.
S/60 = I \ I.D
Time to evacuate two ca irig volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I -z..-z.-z. I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) I 1.3S
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D 0 HCL D 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100 ml 0 I!] H2S04 1!9 D
Hea~y Metals 0 D 250m! D 0 HN03 D 0
All Other Non Radi ologies 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Presenr. 0 D
Gross Alpha 0 D 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 D D
Other (specify) 'E D Sample volume D m 0 "EI
G~ lor•'~<. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I I 03 :3'+ Sample Time L..l _o..::g_z._:..l ___ _,
..-::-See instruction
Comment
Arrived on ~,'te ,_+ 0753, -(,.11..,~,.-a,.,J. &o.r,.;., pr~~en-f-~r f'"'r~e . f>~-A~~e b~..,..., ~t 0757
fv.r~e:A w1!.11 .for .... to-1-IA./ of I M;t"\\A.+~ t:illA 30 .Sc!U)J'ldS.. r~-A("~~J. ~~II J.r~. Vl"'-ter uJ~ M~"!>~
c.kw. ?v.r-~<.-~l"l~eA '"'"t 0758. Lc.tt s.+c. """t-0801 .
A(("i~ 0() sl+<:.. o-t 0'617 --r;.f\(IC:t" "'"J G-o-rr:, p•c~~/)+-To b0\.:1 0."1 J c.ollec1-.s~W'/r'e~
~"'""f'~ L:.oll~c.+c:J. .,..+-0~21 l...c:~ s:+c 01. +-O&"Z3
Depth +o wei\+er wt'o;:, qs.IY
TWN-07 05-06-2014 !Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: lz.'"'b:: Q-A<~~ri'er N dr"""te Zl>19
See instruction
Location (well name):l ._ 'T __ W_AJ_-_0_7_1_~---------' Sampler Name
and initials: l=tNJ~r Ho nk:!:!Jf»
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging l~.-~.;../_&_/_z_o_:l'f _____ ..J and Sampling (if different)! ._»_7A _________ __,
Well Purging Equip Used: (Q]pump or @]bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) l Grv.nJ:fos
Purging Method Used: [QJ2 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event IGv.a.-+c.<'li )\) ifrb.i"C Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Eventl ,_ AJ._0_11' ________ ...J
pH Buffer 7 .o ._l _7_._o ___ __.
Specific Conductance ._l -"-9_9 ____ ....JI !!MHOS/ em
Depth to Water Before Purging · .... 1 _o ___ ___,
Weather Cond.
Time I 07~ I Gal. Purged 11~-z.. I
Conductance I '"·~ I pH I 8.3'3 I
Temp. °C I ns.sl I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I Z'Zl I
Turbidity (NTU) IV I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. °C I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
pH Buffer 4.0 '4.o
Well Depth(O.Olft): 0
Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:l 0 ,(.653h)
3'' Well:_t-~~----!. (.367h)
Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling event)!._ l:f_' __ -....J
Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. °C I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged ISO gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
s16o = I ll.o
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two ca!ii ng volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 0 I
0
I o
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs L-1 _A_\J_A_L _____ __.,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml D D HCL 0
Nutrients "E 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2S04 ~
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologies D 0 250 mJ 0 0 No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 D HN03 0
Other (specify) lSI 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0
c, 'h l o,: ~e
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth ._I __ o ___ __. Sample Time o/~7
Comment
G-111\of\.S
LJ}
o n !:. r-h~ ~-t
be.~fl 11\. ;-
of' DI
~rt-c:. A-
See instruction
012'1. ~t'ln~r """a G-o-rr-'() r•eserd· -h>r R.:n.s,p.l
o/25. f>w"'~J. :SO G-.,.Jio".s of' Sb'1 wQ-.t'Cr ~~~J lot>
W. +c r: It.'~ :;. .JG efiJ eJ ..,A_ .s~ ""f le s 0 tlec.+d o..} 07"37.
673Gf. ·D:f 'R~n~+c
TWN-07R 05-06-2014 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
0
D
D
D
~
2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 05-05-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL See instruction
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: l z nd \3).v.o.r+c:.r ;V1=fr ... -h_ 2 CJ I'/
Location (well name): ._I _i'"_vJ_JJ_:-_I_g _________ __.
Sampler Name
and initials: ~~,nu "116Jl ,·J'!jjnr
Field Sample ID , \IJIJ -l'g _ o5o6261 'I
Date and Time for Purging 1...__5_/_,_l_z_o_l_'{ _____ ..J and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: [Q]pump or [ill bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: ~2 casings [ill3 casings
Sampling Event I Qv..,r4c:r(j ;Q,=tr~t<. Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event ..._1_/i_W_IJ_-_o_J ____ __.
pH Buffer 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 4.6
Specific Conductance ._1 _1..:..~.:....~;__ ___ _,1~-tMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): l4S .OD
Depth to Water Before Purging I 58. S5 Casing Volume (V) 4" WeU:I .5G.?5 1(.653h)
3" Well:._--=o __ ___,_ (.367h)
Weather Cond. Ext' IAmb. Temp. ·c (prior sampling eventl....,lt..::f.;._6 __ _.
Time I IOZ.S I Gal. Purged 1 iiCf I Time IID"G" I Gal. Purged I 110 I
Conductance I 7..Z'"I!) I pH I c;,qo I Conductance I z:z. 'ij I pH I (.'11. I
Temp. °C I Fl'-1 I Temp. oc 1 ILt. bo I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ~0~ I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 'Z.. tJ" I
Turbidity (NTU) I ~-zo I Turbidity (NTU) l 3Z.Z I
Time I I o-z.1 I Gal. Purged I ~'Z: I I Time l 1o-z.g I Gal. Purged 11'3-z. I
Conductance I 2"2.52 I pH I b•Gf$ I Conductance I ZZ.5Z I pH 17.00 I
Temp. °C I )g. c.o I Temp. oc I J<-J. 'o I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I Z4LJ I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 2._10 I
Turbidity (NTU) I ~oz.. I I Turbidity (NTU) I 3ZZ.. I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q , in gpm.
S/60 = I \l.O T = 2V/Q = .__ ___ ___,
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) ~...I _o ___ _.
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated C!l ~------'
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N s pecified below) y N y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nuuients [)g 0 IOOml 0 ~ H2S04 ~ 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml D 0 HN03 0 D
Other (specify) 00 D Sample volume 0 ~ 0 l'i9
C 1-dori~c... If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I bD ' b5 Sample Time lozR
See instruction
Comment
Arrl\)ea Or\ ~A·~~+ 1013 -r:..ner .,.,J GMrit1 T're.serr-t -fo r rl).r.j-co _)'"1J .5"'""'?};...,0 eve;r/.
P"'-r~..e b~"'' ~+ lOik P"'r~-eJ. v->~11 .};;, "\ -1-ot'\1 of' 12. JV1i..,,..+~..s
?V\r~t::. ~nae~ ",.,J. .s"'""IPI~ c..o 11~-kJ "t lozg
wo..+c:r v)"-.::> 1"\v.<~
L8W s ~+o!: 0\+ 10:30
TWN-18 05-06-2014 l.oo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I -z. .... ~ Q v.o-<fer ;V Jotr"'+c::. 'Zo 1'-l
See instruction
Location (well name): L.l :O......._w_Al_-_G_o _________ --J
Sampler Name
and initials: =-t""'flne.r Holl iJ;:;:;vrif
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging L-1 __ 5...;./.....;;8...;./_z_O...:.ij-1------' and Sampling (if different) ""/A
Well Purging Equip Used: (![]pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) l .v/A
Purging Method Used: [g]2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I·QI).Dor:kd!;i ;0 i+ro-f (... Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event L.~-~----='P_;_e_z_-_0_1 _ ___,
'f'i~z.-01
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 4.0
Specific Conductance L-1 ...;..'f1..:...J1t...._ ___ __,l~-tMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): ..... 1 o _____ _,
Depth to Water Before Purging l.____o ___ _, Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:~O-----tl(.653h)
3" Well:. D _(.367h)
Weather Cond. Gleo.r Ext'l Amb. Temp. ·c (prior sampling eventl,_l-z_o_" __ _,
Time I CH'L'f I Gal. Purged I 0 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance 1-z..'i I pH I g.~l I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. °C I '"~ ,(l..J I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 17 I 1~2. Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 5.7 I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. °C I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (mY) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 0 gallon(s}
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gprn.
S/60 = I 0
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T= 2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D 0
Nutrients E D 100 m1 D E H2S04 J8 D
Heavy Metals D D 250ml D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Rud i<l,loglcs D D 250 ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) tl D Sample volume 0 ~ D r:J
c'h \or;Jc If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth!~.... _0 ____ ---1 Sample Time 67j)()
See instruction
Comment
TWN-60 05-08-2014 !Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2 _,-
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL see instruction
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I z"'" GhJ-o.r:fcr N i+r~'h< ?t> f'/
Sampler Name
Location (well name): I :=fw.N -4,5 and initials: I ~~~,.,~r R~>Jl,Ji1/Til
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging l~--"s.='-/_6_/z._o--'1~.__ ____ __, and Sampling (if different) ~.-""'....;.:...1..;..~~---------J
Well Purging Equip Used: OOpump or @] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I lff'v.f'IM'o.s
Purging Method Used: jiD2 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event I Q..-."'t=fc::(6 tJ;fr,..fe Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event 1--J-v->N-DI
pH Buffer 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 4.0
Specific Conductance ._l ...:.'f_<f_t.f ____ __.l~-tMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): I l'Z.5.IO
Depth to Water Before Purging I 50 . b5 Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:' ~&I ,00 ,(.653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) a...=-----'
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling event)~.-.1 ...::::10;...0 __ __.
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. oc I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pH] I
Temp. oc I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1'32. gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q , in gpm.
S/60 = l._)-'-'-1"'-. D __ ___.
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T = 2V /Q = I z .q I I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) l o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated I o
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients Iii 0 100 ml D 1:!1 H2S04 ~ 0
Heavy Metals D 0 250 ml 0 D HN03 D 0
All Other Non Radiologies D 0 250 ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml D D HN03 D 0
Other (specify) !:il D Sample volume D [!l D g)
L'h \ot<de If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I -S l · Z5 Sample Time 08~
See instruction
Comment
o~ 7W;t)-Ot.f
TWN-65 05-06-2014 !Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WIDTE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I Z. nbo Q -.>.tA rtGI' C.h I orof't>rfr'l "Z.ol"'
~ See instruction
Location (well name): I.__1_W_Q_-_z_z _________ _.
Sampler Name
and initials: I :::r,.n11er Holl·I~If.i}
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I._S/_1_'1_/Ul_l_'i _____ _. and Sampling (if different) 1'-_.......-:_:r.'-Jq---------"
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump or @]bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I Z:or•Jir1\IIOU~
Purging Method Used: [QJ2 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event I Gv.Ari:c:t\~ GY.Ioro:\orm Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event l.__~_w_4_~-z._4 _____ _.
pH Buffer 7.0 =t,O pH Buffer 4.0 4.0
Specific Conductance 1...._'1'1_~ ____ __,1 f!MHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): I \13.50
Depth to Water Before Purging I S'i ·'-0 Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:,3.S.J4 ,(.653h)
3" Well: o (.367h) ....__ ___ _,
Weather Con d. Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling event)._j -z._4' __ _,
Time I lL..'·N I Gal. Purged I 0 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I b7IZ I pH 1 G?.7o I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. °C 1 n;:zrc; I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ~ll·z: I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidi!)' (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHj I
Temp. oc I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) l I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 0 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I 1KO
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I 2>}'1\ I
j o
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs &.:I A...:...W:........:...;A:....L ______ -1
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs --u D 3x40 ml D 'El HCL ~ D
Nutrients "!I D 100 ml D Cl H2S04 fS D
Heavy Metals D D 250m! D 0 HN03 0 D
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250 m1 0 0 No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 m1 D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) lJ 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0 ~
Lh\or;Ac. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth '-'17'--'f,:....:.., -'-'\1 ___ _. Sample Time l..___,r.;;;......;z.q£)=------'
See instruction
Comment
Arr',._,~~ 01"1 ~itc. ~1' )'Z.liO . ~Mer DI.11J. (rD.rr": .... pr~s.art" fo c..olle<:.+ SAmple>.
~~"'~pi-c~ <::olle.d-~). a-1-)2LJ.S w,..+c.r ~S C.lco.r
Lef1-s:+c. .,..t \'2.1..\g
Gb(\finlt\Olo'S fV\rvlf;~ well
TW4-22 05-19-2014 lno not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I Z:''J; Q .... c>.ri .. r C.h16roform "Z.D/Y
See instruction
Location (well name): ._I _-r_w_·_q_-_z_4 __________ _,
Sampler Name
and initials: i..,.=;.nnu H.,}l.t};.,~Jiil
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging IL..-_51_1'1_7_2_D_l'1 _____ _J and Sampling (if different) I N/A
Well Purging Equip Used: (][]pump or @]bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: ~2 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event l Q \.M)..(+cr8 ChI o•o:fDrl'l1 Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event IL..-•_w_L\_-_?..._5 _____ __,
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 4,0
Specific Conductance ._l_q_q_;.q ____ ~lfAMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): I \ I'Z..5{)
Depth to Water Before Purging I & 7.70 Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:l ?-9.2S l(.653h)
3" Well:'-· _o ___ __._(.367h)
Weather Con d. Ext'l Amb. Temp. ·c (prior sampling eventl._l z_~_0
__ _,
Time I )2 Z'j I Gal. Purged I 0 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I ~117 I pH I ,,S1 I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I IL77 I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I zz.~ I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I r.; I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I D I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I Temp. °C I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 0 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpru.
S/60 = I \7./0
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casin
T = 2V/Q = 3.30 .....__ _____ .....
l o
Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs IL..!t_W_*_z... ______ -.~
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs 1ll 0 3x40 ml D ~ HCL 19 D
Nutrients ll D 100 ml D El H2S04 l:l D
Heavy Metals 0 0 250m] 0 D HN03 0 D
All Other Non Radiologies 0 D 250 mJ D D No Preserv. 0 D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) 'f) 0 Sample volume D 'tJ 0 1!1
G"' \or;·~~( If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth ._I b;;;..'l-'-''"-"'{5::;..... __ __. Sample Time \Z'30
See instruction
Comment
A ... riv~A O(l ~;·h:: o..-t l'"Z.Z(.. ~llflt:r'" o.rJ. G-.... rr;l1 fT'O!!>~rrr +o collect .sc;.l'l'lf)c~
~~rY1f1o c.oP~J.::! .J--123D L0o..1cr ~~ Glco.r
LeW ~rtt:: ~~.t IZ.>.b
CoJ; Y)I.AOv.~
TW4-24 05-19-2014 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I2-'"1J,.. Qv.o-r'fel" G.nlorOfon·n ZOIY
[ -"~"J See instruction
Location (wen name): .._l_-r_W_4_-_z_5 _________ __,
Sampler Name
and initials: j-r;..nn-Gr Hol\•dA.,.:1)/J+
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging ._I S/=-.;1;..:~ .... /_2_0...:.1'"1....:...._ ____ __, and Sampling (if different) ..._M_~..:.:A..;_ _______ __,
Wen Purging Equip Used: (!Tipump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) KorJ;)11Abu..~
Purging Method Used: [QJ2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I G.V+rterb C..h lorbforrv'l Prev. Wen Sampled in Sampling Event '-l-r_w_Y_-_l_4 _____ ___.
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 4.0
Specific Conductance ._I _'f_q_q ___ __,l [.lMHOS/ em Wen Depth(O.Olft): I n;q, 8D
Depth to Water Before Purging Ill tS.oo Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:,to.47 1(.653h)
3" Well:._ __ o ___ _,_ (.367h)
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling event)._IZ_4_0
__ _,
Time I rz.1'i I Gal. Purged I 0 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I 'Zb\3 I pH I 6 . 83 I Conductance I I. pHI I
Temp. oc I 15-02 I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I "Z 0 1.:~ I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 0 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate Q), in gpm.
s16o = I tg.o
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V /Q = I l :2] I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) l o
If we)) evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated l o
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ._I A_v.l_fs_L. ______ ___,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y
VOCs ~ D 3x40 ml D ~ HCL JSl
Nutrients ~ D 100 ml D [g H2S04 ~
Heavy Metals D D 250ml D D HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250 rnl 0 D No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) liZI D Sample volume D t8 0
C }, lor 1 'J c. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I 1'31. Ot Sample Time 1~....-'2....;;!5=------'
See instruction
Comment
Arr iJd. 61"\ s;+c "+ )"Z.li.-J,.Mcr .AnJ. & ... rr:., pc~l'l+ -To c::oll~c..+-s~Mf)~~­
Sg..""f\c~ Lo\\c£..+~ oJ rz.l~. Le.q. s;tc. ~ )2lg
~ tcr (;.)~ cJ~o..r
TW4-25 05-19-2014 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
0
D
D
181
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I znii Q .... Ar;fe,.. C.l-IDro+:k,.,., 2.014
Location (well name): Ll_-ri_'Jo)___;,~_-..;;.b..;;;0 _________ ---1
Sampler Name
and initials:
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I S/27 /ZOJ4 and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
1 See instruction
Purging Method Used: IQJ2 casings [9]3 casings
Sampling Event I Qu.o.r"tcrl\ G\11orot~(f"'' Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event I IWY-OZ
pH Buffer 7.0 7. () pH Buffer 4.0 19-0
Specific Conductance ._I _q.;....q;....:1'--___ _,h.lMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): l.__c ___ _.
Depth to Water Before Purging._!...;..() ___ __... Casing Volume (V) 4" Well :~_0-::-------11(.653h)
3" Well:. lJ . (.367h)
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. ·c (prior sampling eventJI._Z_Z_" _ __,
Time l1o1~ I Gal. Purged I 0 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I ~.g I pH 17.5! I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I_ -z.I.SC.. I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I t.Z.3 I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I TurbidiLy (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHj I
Temp. °C I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged c) gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I C).
Time to evacuate two a ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q =I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 0
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs AI.VAL
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs Ill D 3x40 ml D ll HCL fll 0
Nutrients Ill 0 100 ml 0 Ell H2S04 IE 0
Heavy Metals D 0 250 m1 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250 ml D 0 No Preserv. D 0
Gross Alpha 0 D 1,000 ml D 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) Ill 0 Sample volume 0 Ill 0 g
C'hlor:lc_ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth L-1 __ t> ___ ...J Sample Time lOIS
See instruction
Comment
TW4-60 05-27-2014 loo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
TabC
Kriged Current Quarter Groundwater Contour Map, Capture Zone Map, Capture Zone Details Map, and
Weekly, Monthly and Quarterly Depth to Water Data
TIME WELL level
1235 MW-1 64.02
1006 MW-2 109.62
1303 MW-3 82.70
1304 MW-3A 84.70
1313 MW-5 106.50
1239 MW-11 86.40
1311 MW-12 108.25
1031 MW-14 103.26
1027 MW-15 106.11
1250 MW-17 72.35
1258 MW-18 71.07
1250 MW-19 59.05
847 MW-20 89.45
818 MW-22 66.79
1010 MW-23 116.20
1003 MW-24 113.60
1242 MW-25 74.15
847 MW-26 73.22
1328 MW-27 53.10
1000 MW-28 75.47
1321 MW-29 101.21
1324 MW-30 75.10
1237 MW-31 67.80
1234 MW-32 75.80
1016 MW-33 DRY
1023 MW-34 107.70
1013 MW-35 112.22
1015 MW-36 110.35
1025 MW-37 111.52
Notes
NAME: Clay Most, Garrin Palmer, Tanner Holliday, Mike Palmer
DATE: 6/25/14
TIME WELL Level TIME WELL Level TIME
900 MW-4 69.40 1339 PIEZ-1 63.54 NA
749 TW4-1 66.38 1250 PIEZ-2 34.92 NA
745 TW4-2 66.73 1310 PIEZ-3 46.06 959
739 TW4-3 53.71 1244 PIEZ-4 53.21 1003
902 TW4-4 69.88 1247 PIEZ-5 51.73 1018
735 TW4-5 62.59 1333 TWN-1 59.00 948
754 TW4-6 69.93 842 TWN-2 30.89 940
747 TW4-7 66.87 1318 TWN-3 38.16 1008
752 TW4-8 65.84 1313 TWN-4 51.38 1258
737 TW4-9 60.35 TWN-5 Abandon 1256
732 TW4-10 60.13 1253 TWN-6 76.91 1254
744 TW4-11 59.44 1231 TWN-7 86.31 827
805 TW4-12 43.20 TWN-8 Abandon 829
814 TW4-13 48.15 TWN-9 Abandon NA
817 TW4-14 83.56 TWN-10 Abandon 912
847 TW4-15 73.22 TWN-11 Abandon NA
1231 TW4-16 64.49 TWN-12 Abandon 919
1234 TW4-17 75.08 TWN-13 Abandon 908
1326 TW4-18 63.55 1245 TWN-14 61.79 859
830 TW4-19 69 .90 TWN-15 Abandon 925
846 TW4-20 70.55 1241 TWN-16 47.54 902
1324 TW4-21 65 .27 TWN-17 Abandon 929
845 TW4-22 59.98 1315 TWN-18 59.22 NA
757 TW4-23 65.95 740 TWN-19 53.03
844 TW4-24 64.40
840 TW4-25 62.47
BOO TW4-26 63.83
835 TW4-27 80.51
811 TW4-28 37.79
823 TW4-29 72.19
829 TW4-30 76.90
833 TW4-31 82.26
808 TW4-32 49.41
838 TW4-33 70.67
820 TW4-34 70.02
826 TW4-35 74.36
815 TW4-36 58.35
WELL Level
DR-1 Abandon
DR-2 Abandon
DR-S 83.05
DR-6 94.31
DR-7 92.08
DR-8 51.16
DR-9 86.54
DR-10 78.06
DR-11 98.05
DR-12 90.12
DR-13 69.65
DR-14 76.30
DR-15 92.85
DR-16 Abandon
DR-17 64.86
DR-18 Abandon
DR-19 63.05
DR-20 55.21
DR-21 100.96
DR-22 DRY
DR-23 70.58
DR-24 44.13
DR-25 Abandon
Weekly Inspection Form
Date Name
( System Operational (If no note
Time Well Del)th* Comments anv oroblems/~orrectlve actions)
I y '-i Z. MW-4 _6_q .32 Flow 4.~ 6-P,v.. {Yes)No
Meter 3"i8'i 2.6. q g (Yes')No
-"
1'-13S' MW-26 ,g5_7q Flow ID .3 &fJA (Y'es) No
Met.er 1..\\\\{{5.57 (J_ej) No
11.\oo TW4-19 6q .0 '"{ Flow 17.'\ GP/A. Cfe~ No
Meter Z.3oz~~5.oo {Yes )No
\.43'"< TW4-20 6 ''f. 6'\ Flow q .. 5 &(>!'-'\. (Ye~ No
Meter 6' 32:07.5 ~9 '{ _{Ye~ No
I '-1. "4. Y. TW4-4 7o. 1 go Flow S.o c;.PA @ No
Meter 312 z. 8'. L.\0 ({_~No
.......
i~-HI\ TWN-2 'LB. 60 Flow I f(,O 6-P.P\. fre§) No
Meter 23.121.\Z..oD /Yej} No
I "i Ztj TW4-22 ALtr Flow I 8. I GPX (veSj No
Meter 11q3oo o1 ~No
......
t LIZ~ TW4-24 6S.OO Flow 17.6 GP"""-(Yesj No
Meter ll tl tu,~ q .a.to @?J No
\415 TW4-25 6'0. 26 Flow 17 Lo{ GfJA. (YeS) No
Meter 66o'-\ 1& .. qn (Ve5} No
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ---------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
Date Y/t s/1'1
Svstem 0Derational (If no note
Time Well De 12th* Comments an'l_Problems/corrective acti'ons)
I'Z46 MW-4 12.~/., Flow L.{_L1 &P.M (Ye§) No
Meter ~5&.432.0.~ (J_~ No
130h MW-26 ,.(q ~Lj Flow IO.&.t GPA Cfe_i) No
Met.er 1.1 1~4_.1)~ t;q C{e$) No
1"100 TW4-19 h_q gz. Flow \S.O 6PM des~ No
Meter "23 Z3ZS" 3. 00 ?feS) No
13D'i TW4-20 t; I _5.5· Flow lO . .a_ 6-P~ (Yes) No
Meter '33511L~C deiJ No
JZSO TW4-4 70.~Z. Flow <X.o _&P,M.. @No
Meter .3167gc:; .'1D (fes No
1322. TWN-2 30 .~'4 Flow I g. Z. 6P.M Qe§'1 No
Meter 2366 'Z.C1. 1.10 <Yes No
1314 TW4-22 sq_ss· Flow jg.l) ~j),M.. <l::e~ No
Meter '21os2 6o ~~No
L31S TW4-24 iO,I.(D Flow 17.6 (;-f',..v\ <S(e§ No
Meter llZ.~IDZ ~() ~No
l"ilS TW4-25 60 zo Flow I 8 . \ t.d_/"\. <.Yg§) No
Meter 670o tn. 46 d_eSj No
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken {Please list well number): ---------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
(
Weekly Inspection Form
Date y{zt{tj
System Operational (If no note
T' a me W II e D th* 6P1 c t ommen s bl sf I i ) an~ ero em correct ve act ons
I4Zl MW-4 _6_q,SI Flow 4.3 &tiM (Y~~ No
Meter .35'1\57. oq C/Fi) No -
1-t z. '3 MW-26 68.l8 Flow \O .l ~ (Ye~ No
Met.er 4155"56. '115 ?Yes) No -
1350 TW4-19 77,g9 Flow Jg.o &PM (Yes)No
Meter 23LtZ71S.O'i (Yes_) No
_ll..ll'\ TW4-20 72.. lio Flow q,s t;PJJ... {fe$) No
Meter 6:35107.13 ~ No
~
1~30 TW4-4 74.t"Z.. Flow 7." ~.#'\... (Yes) No
Meter 3Z07if~_!.{C) die~ No
....,
1'-foK TWN-2 zq DO Flow jg,s ~P#\. {Yes\ No
Meter 2400(;[. 7n eYes) No _,
I 4.1' TW4-22 ~g_;'Z. Flow I S.o kP__.v... {YeS\ No
Meter 1 zzgp, 4 1.n (Ves) No
141'2.. TW4-24 6'1 gq Flow l8.o ~PM (Ye§) No
Meter II ~q_ ... 7~ RO {Ye§) No
I '105 TW4-25 6o.4..1) Flow 17.6 GP.I""\. ~No
Meter t7~1-{65.hu (Yes) No
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ---------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
(
(
{
\
Weekly Inspection Form
Date t~{z.g/p-l
Time Well Depth* Comments
14U/ MW-4 ,.t;q.Dot; Flow 4.&.4 Li~M
Meter S646go.l4
l4.3ct MW-26 K!\.4D Flow lo. 7 ~P.M
Met.er 1117.641.1il
IIUU. TW4-19 r.s. n .. Flow lg'.i 6-PM
Meter 'Z365"& ~ t · Ob
1431-. TW4-20 ~'1-Go Flow lo.o G-P.M
Meter 636~'2.:3 . c:J5
1~.'-4£ TW4-4 "7.'5.1of 7_ Flow ff. o G.P .AI\
Meter 3253Jg'_q(;
14Zt.l TWN-2 'Z$?.•:t5 Flow IR'. 7 6-i'A
Meter 2437'-I~.&D
141"Z. TW4-22 6J.Sg Flow t«g,l &P.M
Meter _l 2~771 31"l
IY79 TW4-24 67.f?D Flow I (.o kP./Y..
Meter I L-:,,t;t')~b ..5/')
l112t"' TW4-25 ho.J3 Flow 17.S 6-f...M.
Meter 68"~ 16\. 7D
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
. Monld~ ,.b IA.a.t=t).. •be. r~;-wl.
System Operational (If no note
anv problems/corrective actfonsl
(Ye~ No
<S(e~ No
...:::-.
6'e~ ~No
~es) No
_Q_e£ No
@ No
<Y:e§) No
_fJ_es No -
(y__ej No
<Yes No
(le~ No
(yes J No
~eS) No
({e~ No
~e§ No
~e~ No
~No
<Je~ No -
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): p. c f ln&-c .. J.. Mt he £h..t o I 3D 0 ,.., t.-11 'l.'\ h '-\.
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Monthly Depth Check Form
Date 41-tj(i ~ Name (U,crfo P&lM«t, tA«':C<=C H~ il ;eA_e..y
( Time Well Depth* Time Well Depth*
!'l.21£ MW-4 ,'1,89 1:2.01 TWN-1 5$.76
1227 TW4-1 0618~ 11£3 TWN-2 2~eS6
1.2.30 TW4-2 bb.5D IZa~ TWN-3 37. 'll
1'2.'2:3 TW4-3 53.52 I ISS TWN-4 51.00
I'd-.~ TW4-4 {(). 0 t 1~13 TWN-7 ~ p-32.
1~0 TW4-5 ~2-tq II 5.5 TWN-18 59.29
).1.3~ TW4-6 ~~. ('2~ 1'6-ll MW-27 $.2,5
rz.G.S TW4-7 ''-G.O I~ I\ MW-30 (5. ?:i::)
12.l,{::. TW4-8 <;5.70 ~~64 MW-31 -1 i:!sts'
i J.d...;l TW4-9 S'l . 'l4 l'Z. !:l.b TW4-28
l ':l:}7 TW4-10 ,5j. J~ l:l.~'t TW4-29 7:J...,-;;l..b
IJi~ TW4-11 5 q. 2.{. 1,2'4::L TW4-30 77.10
12:58 TW4-12 C-tJ.09 1'2.'-1 s TW4-31 zz.~z
I:Z.5:3 TW4-13 ~6-25 i1S8 TW4-32 ~q -~
I 'l.S I TW4-14 f13 ,S '-t \301 TW4-33 ID.rl I
13\.S TW4-15 (:;,~ ~~ ld,5Q TW4-34 /0.0~
( l~l h TW4-16 ~'3 .'{5~
13Q6 TW4-17 {Mw·]~ ]5.Q(')
I:Zc3 TW4-18 63.10
1101 TW4-19 1> .... 1~
Ill~ TW4-20 70.15{
IZQ.5 TW4-21 64-77
\13'2.. TW4-22 6/:2.1a
l::t3~ TW4-23 ,S.7D
II~ TW4-24 b,f.O'Z..
115Q TW4-25 bo.O~
I 2.37 TW4-26 63,1.5:
(2..j1 TW4-27 80,b~
Comments: (Please note the well number for any comments)
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet
Weekly Inspection Form
Date sl s/ 1'1
Svstem Ooerational (If no note
Time Well Deoth* Comments anv croblems/correctlve actions\
12-SO MW-4 7~.6o Flow ~ · L/ frPP\ (Yes) No
Meter >IVOSI.I?: eYes) No
IL."i( MW-26 l 0. f<g Flow \o.o G-P~ ~No
Met.er 4\iii.\'3 .1S?' '7Yes) No --
1310 TW4-19 70. l'Z. Flow /g, { 6-P ,;t-1 ~No
Meter 2...38 7i 3_!). ()(J {Yej) No
'
\L.YU. TW4-20 68 .00 Flow q. I G-f J.A. /Ye~No
Meter i?_I~U~ -~No
125", TW4-4 70. tL.l Flow c;l.O G-f>.N\. ?Yes ~No
Meter 32'l~'2. 7. D l /Yes~o
I ''-'71.\ TWN-2 3{) Zo Flow I~.?. ~CJ.Jo.A-('le'S) No
Meter Z'-17"10.4 Lf() {Yes') No =
I'Z....Y \ TW4-22 Sct.65 Flow i51 2. triA (Y~ No
Meter I '2.62. iD. U.O (Yes) No
l '2. '3 s-TW4-24 t.7.1.7 Flow 1!2..2 GP.M -(Yes-;-No
Meter 11126'71 611 {fa~ No
-
12.'!0 TW4-25 73.4&) Flow \ 7 . ~ G~.Jv'\ (YeS;; No
Meter b q l q 7 51 /,f) (YeS\ No
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): --------------
"Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
System Operational (If no note r · 1me W II e D h* e_12_t c omments an~ eroblems/corrective actions}
13Zl MW-4 7\.3D Flow 4 I.\ &f.?.M ~No
Meter 37562.7. tio ~No
13.17 MW-26 h q, f<() Flow 'L &' 6-P.M (Ye~ No
Met,er 4 '2.o~8'q . 77 (fe~ No
134Y TW4-19 ...<8'.12.. Flow \_R _ _a_ 6-P .#\. _d~~ No
Meter '2'-ltog t8. oo ?fe~ No
1314 TW4·20 h g, '20 Flow 8'-'-l &~.M ~No
Meter '2._5:3_5-L '-I (Yes) No
......
13'23 TW4-4 kl ~y Flow ~-1 6-P.M (feey) No
Meter ~'34SZ\ Ao (Yes) No
130"! TWN-2 2'1.g& Flow 18.~ 6-PM (f~No
Meter 2510 I 'I. R'O (Yes~ No
""""'
131l TW4-22 _I) q. S''1 Flow I 8-o 6-P_...vl.... (lesj No
Meter l '2-8'4'1 8'. If} C[es~_jNo
~
1.30 8' TW4·24 6_7.5o Flow \7, I 6-:f..M Cf_e"S)No
Meter usrgg-. .5>< eYe~ No
\.'XJD TW4-25 ,<z_q'-{ Flow 17.G' 6-f',..,v(. <Yes!) No
Meter 7o7J.SI 7o (feS\No
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ---------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
(
Svstem Ooerational (If no note
Time Well Depth" Comments anv problems/correctiveactions)
I"Jf.>S MW-4 ;::,q~~ Flow L\.Ll 6P#\ {X_es_J\Jo
Meter 3812-o~-L \I f{es _)Jo -,
13>~~ MW-26 6'1. LO Flow \o. l{ &VA /'Jes')No
Met.er L\ t1.'{6Y. $5" 7Ves) No
\o.3i.l TW4-19 73.6g Flow t Zl.{337q Loo_! {Yes) No
Meter\. 17. q &-PJ"\ J ;Yej) No
IZ-5( TW4-20 68'~30 Flow it.' ;;(J~ (Yes)No
Meter 386t .. :>7 6'es)No
~
l '-(O<-{ TW4-4 h'f. ~z.. Flow ~-D &P.M.. (Yesj No
Meter -~-~qu~"-co _d_e~ No
12'2.'3 TWN-2 -~270 Flow !g .1 &-PA (?'9§) No
Meter zs 41 (5b. b. ('Te§) No
l Z.'1,q TW4-22 5'l.60 Flow JJ(JJ -r..-P..M. (YeS\. No
Meter i3C>~~ ~ ~0 <Y_es\ No
IZ.Zii TW4-24 67.7D Flow 17.'1 &P...-v\ (Ye§)No
Meter I'Z.D.53S.l. -~n Cve§) No
r...
t2t'-t TW4-25 11Ko6 Flow 1$3.0 6-f~ (Ye~ No
Meter 111 Dct6.. ~0 (fes1 }No ----Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): --------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
(_
Weekly Inspection Form
Date Name
System Operational (If no note
Time We!l Depth* Comments anv croblems/correctlve actions)
1'-\15 MW-4 ,..sq _ G.s? Flow y. L{ &P..M. (Yes~o
Meter 3.S 7 656 12:''2-,/Yes) No
---:5,
I_'{ t 7~ MW-26 6G\.lC> Flow 10~_z_c;p.,....,_ ;Yes) No
Met.er L.{ 2. YS"g~ .,.s z (Vet> No
JYL.\D TW4-19 67. q~ Flow I ~.0 6-tA /YJJ§) No
Meter '2.. "'16o5o 7. 7a ~No -
l o.iO'? TW4-20 77.J4. Flow q n G.PA {fe$} No
Meter 54b>5S.t;3 (Ye~ No
.---.
\'1.(16' TW4-4 7(). u. 8' Flow g.o r.,...PJV\ /Yes)No
Meter ~l1 '-t ~lOj {.3D (VeS) No -
135~ TWN-2 30. y '2 Flow 13.0 &.f_.,vL (i~ No
Meter 2.513'1hb_ fS'() &_~No
l '-tOb TW4-22 erst. lo Flow I ~.o f..P.M ?(95) No
Meter 132'loq u(") @) No
140 '2. TW4-24 6 '1. 'ZD Flow 17 rz_ t:-f?.M... (Yes) No
Meter 1 2 Z'-{ 171. '-ID (Yes) No
--=-..-.....
13.5'-{ TW4-25 &o. x-~ Flow I g . -" &-e.IA--Cve~No
Meter 7 2 X'OL-42._ 70 (fe§) No
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): --------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Monthly Depth Check Form
Date 5)30/IL.t. Name p.,_,.,.,..._ \J""'\.-er /!,_ .... ~ Hf.:lt;,.{. ... y
Time Well Del;!th* Time Well Depth*
\018' MW-4 '] 1.~5 a~!:l~ TWN-1 ~g-~Q
IQI~ TW4-1 b.6.. 'Zo 09J~ TWN-2 31·~~
I Ol~ TW4-2 66..55 Q~3Z TWN-3 37.70
1020 TW4-3 S3.S.S o~p~ TWN-4 51' O.]
~DIL-l TW4-4 69 .1 :i 1Q38: TWN-7 ~6 Z.9
I" -z.""' TW4-5 ~z.c..ts Q9.J1 TWN-18 ~9·12.
)QI~ TW4-6 69.6~ C>'tSI MW-27 .S:.J·I 9
101/ TW4-7 hb..h7 ICW MW-30 :z.s:. l 8:
!OZ.O TW4-8 65 .~~ h2Q] MW-31 &?.l:l
1 ,rz.:z .. TW4-9 6Q.06 D9.;3] TW4-28 37.7~
l C2 Z.6 TW4-10 sq.9~ Q~So TW4-29 ]2.. 20
)QI' TW4-11 .59.1-\.Q Q951 TW4-30 ll. 02.
C'2q3~ TW4-12 ~3.1 s: Q1~~ TW4-31 sz . t.i'Z...
QS4~ TW4-13 ~ s ·l.S 093~ TW4-32 L-19 .33
Q91.{5' TW4-14 8.2-75 )QQ~ TW4-33 /0.6_7
l!2~Q TW4-15 ro.o(z O'lS:I TW4-34 ]~-QQ
1002. TW4-16 6. ~. \~ Q9S:~ TW4-35 ]'-1.61
lQQ~ TW4-17 :Z~-~~ Qg:l:J TW4-36 ~9 -~:3
ag~' TW4-18 63.ti
1~33 TW4-19 ~~.~2:
Qg_s:~ TW4-20 &'1.6Q
~~~8: TW4-21 6~-~6
6~5€. TW4-22 59:. ~1
I a 1\ TW4-23 6~.s?5
o~,s:s: TW4-24 6,7.81
09~1 TW4-25 /,,5.1..\ fs'
l~os: TW4-26 63.16.
C13H8 TW4-27 Bo.6]
Comments: {Please note the well number for any comments)
~~v~ tyt yM 4o-ek~e0. <,),1\,. T~;c><-1 -35, .36 tor.4:( Cq &etk MAY kbv~ .Sp""-"
\.)'Ar-lo~.
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet
Weekly Inspection Form
Date Name
System Operational Cit no note
~ W JI e D h* ep_t Comments ·anv cr'oblems/oorrectlve actions)
l z 1.\CJ. MW-4 7'6 .1Cf Flow Ll .l..\ t~fl~ (Ye5)No
Meter 3CfZ Z,_z_C) ~() Cv.es') No
IZY6 MW-26 71.60 Flow 1o.J t:;r~ /Yes) No
Met.er '-'IU477. Z9' /Ve~ No
=
I ::soB TW4-19 7_7. ,_~ Flow lr.i &P.A.A (YeS) No
Meter i.L..\go..ss.:s.oo ~No
.1z'-ls TW4-20 h ~-ll Flow q_g (.,..f,f-'\ (Yes ~o
Meter 6S£?3.5'l rYes) No
~
\ 2.b \ TW4-4 6ti.3'-( Flow 6'. 2-GP _,<A /les) No
Meter 3 !.{ ~'2.66. I 0 ?V~ No
__::,.
I 'Z..3,3 TWN-2 31.'-1?... Flow i 8 _7 GP-""". (Yes) No
Meter 26'20'\'-\.70 (Je~ No
tZ.U.d TW4-22 ~Cf t.fl Flow 1 'it 3 G.P/J\. (Ye~ No
Meter 1.311\'\l. f1o (YeSJ No
I'Z.37 TW4-24 67.6rs Flow 11_ ~ /,..P#\. rY§.S_,No
Meter \·z?J~It)l.1 o (Y~No
~
l2ZC) TW4-25 71.70 Flow 17J.o CP~ (ve?J No
Meter '736112.5C (Ye~) No
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number):. --------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
System Operational (If no note
T' 1me Wll e D h* ept c omments an)lero bl ems/correctlve actions}
'u "'~ MW~4 A'L 7'1, Flow L\. 4 b-PM ,Xes )No
Meter 3~/1:\..,1.1 1.4 ~)No
-......._
\43'S MW~26 ~5.<15 Flow q,7 &? .JV'-(Yes) No
Met.er l.\ 2 <63 zz..sq (!_~ No
\
1~10 TW4~19 70.10 Flow 17. &' &?A ;fes') No
Meter 25D'-IR7SCJo tfe§) No
1~3D TW4~20 7o.rl Flow >? 7< CPA tfe§;, No
Meter 1){_28,65 (Yes) No ---
\-1.3S' TW4-4 fj.L{g' Flow a.o frP-"""\ tees) No
Meter 3£'3c)g ,_ ..< 0 cYeSJ No
II..{ I~ TWN-2 .:So. 7C6 Flow I 8.1 G-P-"" f{e~ No
Meter ZhSI.? '-1 llo ~)No
14'26 TW4-22 {; z. 2. q Flow l~o Gi'#.. (es) No
Meter J357QlZ_ho (f9s) No -
142-3 TW4-24 ,<"&'_ '2 q Flow 11, ~ &P_.vt (fe~ No
Meter 104z.1z.. ~o ~No -
I~\ \b TW4~25 60.50 Flow \8.5 6PP/\. 't__es) No
Meter 7 Y5b '2. 7. 7o (Ye~ No
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ---------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
/
(
Weekly Inspection Form
Date Name
System Operational (If no note
Time Well Deoth* Comments anv problemsfcorrective actions)
1'2.34_ MW-4 h'f. ]~ Flow Lj . l{ &P~ {Yes ).Jo
Meter "1 0 3_1.4__7 l I I (j_es~ No
l'Z. 31 MW-26 7 2. 45 Flow q_Q G?A (_ve) No
Met,er 4.3D6oo _ 27 cfe§> No
1?5.4 TW4-19 7 z, ~'-{ Flow JL.j, l ;;.~.A /YeS')No
Meter Z .5Z K-2.,,.{6 oo . (""'Yes) No
j'Z..29 TW4-20 6 g', R'Z. Flow Cl. g (:,..fJ~ {Yes\ No
Meter ......... ~ ..1 '11 <...( '--. 36 (res] No
_--.....
I '237 TW4-4 lo.3f> ............ J.. Flow s.o &P.-M.-te.iJ No
Meter 3S762.(;,.07 .~No
\7t'1 TWN-2 37.6Li Flow l ~ ') 6{' .tV\. creS} No
Meter 26'12..4 ~' g"Q (YeS) No
ll-26 TW4-22 ~D .OD Flow Hs : 2. r .. ~.M. (Ye~ No
Meter 1376.78.'-lD ~No -
\ z 23 TW4-24 h7.q_5 Flow ,. /.<_o &PM {YeS\ No
Meter l1.'72o~z 2D cY9s)No
'
l 'Z I b TW4-25 IZb 79 Flow l '6. 4 1.-t'M ~)No
Meter 1 55\ 'Do ~Do ('f"es"YJo
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): --------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
System Operational (If no note
Time YJLell Depth* Comments anv problems/corrective actions)
l'Z.'Z.&: MW-4 _.{1 65 Flow 4..4. &~M 6ej) No
Meter J.iC'Ciftltl. "i~ CfeiJ No
1231 MW-26 "?3._0S Flow IO,o &-f>.M <Y_e] No
Met.er 4 ~2.37'i g0 O'es) No
1.]2'2.. TW4-19 /SctZ.. Flow r 7 ~ 6-PP'\ ([e§) No
Meter 25SS'i70. 00 <fe~ No
t23~ TW4-20 o'l.22. Flow JO l 6~M eYe~ No
Meter l076D .~ de§) No
1'225: TW4-4 ~'l . 70 Flow S?'. I 6PM (YesJ No
Meter 36~'\7Li. 2-0 Cves) No
'
( \'Z.L{Z TWN-2 3\.L\3 Flow I ft. t /~,v\ Ctesj No
Meter Z.73 45'i 00 <:Ye§J No
IUL TW4-22 AD.'2.7 Flow , ~.o r .. P./-A-<Ye~ No
Meter \.1117<\0 . .30 0/esj No
12.3~ TW4-24 67.l.lC, Flow II. g &P.M ({es~ No
Meter 1 2t"<l '\o t.o() Qe~ No
"
12-.s TW4-25 64.$50 Flow I g. o 6-f'..,.V.. OeSJ No
Meter 765{)5\. L.ll) Q'e§) No
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ---------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
System Operational (If no note
Ti me W II e D th* ep1 c omments bl I i an:l !;!rO ·ems correct ve act1ons}
I L.t 25 MW~4 6ct.cro Flow 4.Y &fM. ~No
Meter 414.7l'l. 3_() {Ye§) No
~
r Y. s-z. MW~26 77.57 Flow l 0. 2 G-I'M. {Y~No
Met.er 4~35S2 .. L{D /Ye~ No
'---::;:::::::. -"'
Lt;o5 TW4-19 6~ .~Ll Flow I R 3 b-()..,vt (Yes~ No
Meter 2576go q .cr-J_ _{!_es"" }Jo -
ILJLJB TW4-20 6_9. 7L-j Flow I OS &P,AA. 6_esjNo
Meter Jlg2'2. 37 (V'e~ No
=
I4Z.6 TW4-4 6ct./o Flow ~. l 6-f'-""' /Yes) No
Meter .3672.1!1 7' '-10 /1_'9§) No -
J4 zo TWN-2 Jo.t15 Flow IS 2 GPM. (YeS) No
Meter 276537, Llo (Y~No ........._
\ L{l--i'l TW4-22 _6_0 85 Flow I fj.t ~~~Pl. ;fe_§} No
Meter l 4l4 ~I. t4C (ies) No
-,_
\4LLZ) TW4-24 68. '20 Flow IS.'-\ t;:P.AA {Yes) No
Meter t3o66.5g.7o {Ve5) No -
i '1 lh TW4-25 to. ~4 Flow I f<.6 6-rA {f_eal No
Meter /7 3q 06 70 (Yes~o
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): --------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
(
@ estimated dry area
TW4·35 temporary perched monitoring well ¢ss2s installed May, 2014 showing
elevation in feet amsl
MW-5 perched monitoring well showing e 5502 elevation in feet amsl
TW0
4•12 temporary perched monitoring well
5581 showing elevation in feet amsl
TWN-7 hed . . . A 5563 temporary perc nitrate momtonng
V well showing elevation in feet amsl
PIEZ-1 perched piezometer showing
GI ,SS92 elevation in feet amsl
TW4-32 temporary perched monitoring well
~5562 ihstall.ed $ep_tem})er. 2013 showing
elevation in feet amsl
RUIN SPRING & 5380 seep or spring showing
elevation in feet amsl
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
H:/718000/aug14/Uwl0614.srf C-1
,. , ,,',
I I
I I
estimated nitrate capture
zone boundary stream tubes
resulting from pumping
estimated chloroform capture
zone boundary stream tubes
resulting from pumping
@ estimated dry area
TW4-35 temporary perched monitoring well
¢5526 install~d ~ay, 2014 showing
elevation 1n feet amsl
MW·S perched monitoring well showing e 5502 elevation in feet amsl
TW4·;2 temporary perched monitoring well
O o581 showing elevation in feet amsl
TWN-7 temporary perched nitrate monitoring ~63 well showing elevation in feet amsl
PIEZ-1 perched piezometer showing
Q 5592 elevation in feet amsl
TW4·32 tempprary perched monitoring well
~5562 Installed September, 2013 showing
elevation in feet amsl
RUIN SPRING
6 5380 seep or spring showing
elevation in feet amsl
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
KRIGED 2nd QUARTER, 2014 WATER LEVELS
AND ESTIMATED CAPTURE ZONES
WHITE MESA SITE
H:/718000/
14/nitrate/Uwl0614cz2.srf -2
,,' ,.
MW-4 e sss3
TW4-1
0 5552
PIEZ-2
.. 5594
estimated nitrate capture
zone boundary stream tubes
resulting from pumping
perched monitoring well showing
elevation in feet amsl
temporary perched monitoring well
showing elevation in feet amsl
perched piezometer showing
elevation in feet amsl
TW4-32 temporary perched monitoring well
~ 5562 installed September, 2013 showing
elevation in feet amsl
5535
NOTE: MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19, and TW4-20 are chloroform pumping wells;
TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 are nitrate pumping wellsstimated chloroform capture
ng
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
KRIGED 2nd QUARTER, 2014 WATER LEVELS
AND ESTIMATED CAPTURE ZONES
WHITE MESA SITE
H:/718000/
14/nitrate/Uwl0614ntcz.srf
FIGURE
C-3
TabD
Kriged Previous Quarter Groundwater Contour Map
@ estimated dry area
MW-5 perched monitoring well showing e 5503 elevation in feet amsl
TW04-12 temporary perched monitoring well
55G2 showing elevation in feet amsl
TWN-7 h d . . . <>5563 temporary perc e mtrate momtonng
well showing elevation in feet amsl
PIEZ-1 perched piezometer showing ~ 5592 elevation in feet amsl
TW4-32 temporary perched monitoring well
~ 5563 installed September, 2013 showing
elevation in feet amsl
RUIN SPRING b 5380 seep or spring showing
elevation in feet amsl
NOTE: MW-4. MWc26, TW4-41 TW4-19. arid TW4-20 are chloroform
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
KRIGED 1st QUARTER, 2014 WATER LEVELS
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE REFERENCE FIGURE
H:/718000/may14/Uwl0314.srf I D-1
TabE
Hydrographs of Groundwater Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
-a. E -.c
= -C1)
E i=
llo.. C1) > 0
C1) > C1)
..J
llo..
C1) -~
r-I z ~
8 ~/v~/80
c~HO!vO
0~/8~/~~
60/90/LO
80/GG/GO
-
0 c) 0 c) 0 c)
C\J
0
c)
(')
0
c)
"<t
1
~
~
•
0
c)
LO
1
!
0
c)
CD
-c.
E
.c
= -C1)
E
i=
""' C1) > 0
G) > C1)
..J
""' C1) -~
N I z ~
v ~/LC/G ~ ,--------.,.----,----------,r-----.---~-----r------,
£~/t>'~/BO
G~/~0/t>'O ·
o~te~n ~
60/90/LO
BO/GG/GO +----+----t----1-----t----+----t------1
0 c) 0 Lri 0 c) ..-
0 c)
C\1
q
LO C\1
0 c)
C')
-~
E -.c
= -Cl> E
i= ... ~
0
~ Cl> ..J ...
Cl> -~
CW)
I z ~
8~/v~/BO
G~/W/vO
0~/B~H ~
60/90/LO
BO/GG/GO
-
0
c)
q
10
0 c) .....
q
10 ... 0 c)
C\1
q
10 C\1
~
~
~
~
~ •
~
• ~
II
0 c)
C")
~
l/
0 c)
'<!"
q
10 '<!"
-a. E
.c
= -C1)
E
i=
a..
C1) > 0
a; > C1)
.J
a.. C1)
~
~ I z ~
£~/v~/80
U/~0/vO
0~/8~/~ ~
60/90/LO
80/GG/GO
0 0 0 0 ,....
0 0 C\J
0 0 ("')
ll
~
~
~
\
~
0
0 "<t
I/
0
0 LO
0
0 co
v ~/LG/c ~ .--------,----.----,----r-------.-----r-----,
t:>~/0~/90
8~/90/SO -c.
E
.c c ~/B ~/0 ~ = -Cl)
E
i= c~/~0/t:>O a..
Cl) > 0
Cl) > ~ ~/t:>~/60 Cl)
...J
a.. Cl) -~ ~ ~/9c/c0 c.o I z ~ 0~/0~/BO -
0~/ccHO
60/90/LO -
90/B ~/G ~ -1-----t----1-----1------t-----+----+----1
0 ~
17 ~/0 ~/90
8~/90/90 -c.
E -.c G ~/8 ~/0 ~ = -Q)
E i= UH0/170 "-Q) > 0 -Q) > ~ ~/17 ~/60 Q)
.J
"-Q) -~ ~ ~/9G/G0 ..... I z 3: ....
0 ~/0~/80
0~/GG/W
60/90/LO
80/8~/G~
.
0
..f co
0 <ri co
~
1
r\
\
(
~
~
_,.
0
cx:i 0>
v~!0~/90 ' k 1---1---~ l.---K ~ -£ ~/90/90 c.
E
.c
= -Cl> C:~/8~/0~ E
i=
\ ~ IT
:lo..
Cl> I~
> 0 c:~;~o;vo
Cl> > Cl> .J
:lo..
Cl> -~ ~~v~/60 ~
\ ~
~
~ I z
3: ~ ~/9C:/C:O ....
~
0~/0~/BO
0 ~/C:C:/ ~0 "
tt'---r--.
60/90/LO
C\J (")
<0
-c.
E
.c = -C1)
E
i=
:a..
C1) > 0
C1) > C1)
..J
:a.. C1) -~
CD
T"" I z ~
v ~/Lc::/G~ ,-------.-----,.-----,-----....,....-------.------,
v~I0~/90
8 ~/90/90
G~/B~/0~ ·
G~H0/170
~ ~/v ~/60
~ ~/9G/G0
0~/0~/BO
0~/GG/~0
60/90/LO +------+------t----+-----+-----+----1
0
r-...: '<t
0
oi '<t
1.()
oi '<t
-..J 0
0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
0)
0
0
01 0 0 """ !='
0
..____
~ ~~
~ r------:::::. L.-----"" ~~
~
~
~
~
I~
~
4
w 0
0
1\)
0 0
--
0 0 0 0
-
-
-
.
07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/11
04/01/12
10/18/12
05/06/13
11/22/13
06/10/14
12/27/14
-t :e z I .....
CIO
~ -(I)
""'I
r-(I) < (I)
0 < (I)
""'I
::!
3 (I) -::=
C"
3
"'C -
(]1
(]1
(]1
(]1
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
(]1
.j::o.
(]1 (]1
(,)
(]1
(,)
(]1
1\)
(]1
1\)
0, 0
1-----+---+----t------+----t----+-----+07/06/09
0 0, 7'-0 0, 0 0,
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/11
04/01/12
10/18/12
~ 05/06/13
11/22/13
-06/10/14
I 12/27/14
-4 ::e z I ...... co
~ -CD ""' r-CD < CD
0 < CD ""' ::1
3 CD --:-+
C"
3
"C -
-c.
E
.c ... --(I)
E
i=
:lo.
(I) > 0
(I) > (I)
..J
:lo. (I) -~
0 C")
I :s:
:E
v ~/LUC. ~ .----.,.-----,--------.------;------.--------,
8~/t>~/80 .
<::~HO/t>O
0~/8~H ~ ·
60/90/LO ·
80/i::i::/1::0 •
90/0~/0~
90/81::/90 +-----+----+-----+-----1-----+-----1
0 c:i 00
-c.
E
.c
..: --C1)
E
i= ...
C1) > 0
C1) > C1)
..J ...
C1) -~
T""
('I)
I 3: :E
8~/17~/80
c~H0/170
0~/8~H ~
60/90/LO
80/GG/GO
90/0~/0~
90/8G/90
r
.
.
~
(0
(0
(
~
\
~
~
t
)
0
6 r--
~~
~
~ -~
0
cci r--
0
<ri r--
~
0 co
0
C\i co
TabF
Depths to Groundwater and Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -1
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,646.96 5,648.09 1.13 112.5
5,600.38 02/06/09 47.71 46.58
5,599.99 07/21/09 48.10 46.97
5,600.26 09/21/09 47.83 46.70
5,601.10 10/28/09 46.99 45.86
5,602.59 12/14/09 45.50 44.37
5,600.55 03/11/10 47.54 46.41
5,600.66 05/11/10 47.43 46.30
5,599.18 09/29/10 48.91 47.78
5,598.92 12/21/10 49.17 48.04
5,598.29 02/28/11 49.80 48.67
5,597.80 06/21/11 50.29 49.16
5,597.32 09/20/11 50.77 49.64
5,597.15 12/21/11 50.94 49.81
5,596.54 03/27112 51 .55 50.42
5,596.52 06/28/12 51.57 50.44
5,595.03 09/27/12 53.06 51.93
5,596.62 12/28/12 51.47 50.34
5,593.54 03/28/13 54.55 53.42
5,592.38 06/27/13 55.71 54.58
5,591.65 09/27/13 56.44 55.31
5,590.34 12/20/13 57.75 56.62
5,590.03 03/27/14 58.06 56.93
5,589.09 06/25/14 59.00 57.87
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-2
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,625.75 5,626.69 0.94 95
5,611.37 02/06/09 15.32 14.38
5,610.63 07/21/09 16.06 15.12
5,609.73 09/21109 16.96 16.02
5,607.08 11/02/09 19.61 18.67
5,606.57 12114/09 20.12 19.18
5,612.45 03/11110 14.24 13.30
5,612.78 05/11110 13.91 12.97
5,611.37 09/29110 15.32 14.38
5,610.24 12/21110 16.45 15.51
5,610.64 02/28/11 16.05 15.11
5,609.78 06/21111 16.91 15.97
5609.79 09/20/11 16.90 15.96
5609.72 12/21/11 16.97 16.03
5,605.69 03/27/12 21.00 20.06
5,605.67 06/28/12 21.02 20.08
5,603.03 09/27/12 23.66 22.72
5,605.76 12/28/12 20.93 19.99
5,598.28 03/28113 28.41 27.47
5,594.32 06/27/13 32.37 31.43
5,594.38 09/27/13 32.31 31.37
5,594.68 12/20/13 32.01 31.07
5,597.79 03/27/14 28.9 27.96
5,595.80 06/25114 30.89 29.95
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -3
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,633.64 5,634.50 0.86 110
5,603.77 02/06/09 . 0.73 29.87
5,602.37 07/21109 32.13 31.27
5,602.34 09/21109 32.16 31.30
5,602.60 10/28/09 31.90 31.04
5,603.12 12114/09 31.38 30.52
5,602.90 03/11110 31.60 30.74
5,603.23 05/11110 31.27 30.41
5,602.86 09/29/10 31.64 30.78
5,603.35 12/21110 31.15 30.29
5,602.89 02/28111 31.61 30.75
5,602.75 06/21111 31.75 30.89
5,602.40 09/20/11 32.10 31.24
5,602.40 12/21111 32.10 31.24
5,601.70 03/27112 32.80 31.94
5,601.67 06/28/12 32.83 31.97
5,600.50 09/27/12 34.00 33.14
5,601.74 12/28/12 32.76 31.90
5,598.60 03/28113 35 .90 35.04
5,597.18 06/27/13 37.32 36.46
5,597.36 09/27/13 37.14 36.28
5,597.60 12/20/13 36.90 36.04
5,598.00 03/27/14 36.50 35.64
5,596.34 06/25114 38.16 37.30
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -4
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,641.04 5,641.87 0.83 136
5,601.47 02/06/09 40.40 39.57
5,604.26 07/21/09 37.61 36.78
5,605.02 09/21/09 36.85 36.02
5,605.87 10/28/09 36.00 35.17
5,605.81 12/14/09 36.06 35.23
5,605.31 03/11/10 36.56 35.73
5,605.36 05111/10 36.51 35.68
5,604.59 09/29/10 37.28 36.45
5,604.42 12/21/10 37.45 36.62
5,603.69 02/28/11 38.18 37.35
5,603.36 06/21/11 38.51 37.68
5,602.82 09/20/11 39.05 38.22
5,602.79 12/21111 39.08 38.25
5,600.82 03/27/12 41.05 40.22
5,600.84 06/28/12 41.03 40.20
5,598.47 09/27/12 43.40 42.57
5,600.86 12/28/12 41.01 40.18
5,595.57 03/28/13 46.30 45.47
5,594.12 06/27113 47.75 46.92
5,593.33 09/27/13 48.54 47.71
5,591.92 12/20/13 49.95 49.12
5,591.85 03/27/14 50.02 49.19
5,590.49 06/25/14 51.38 50.55
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-6
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) D) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,663.03 5,664.94 1.91 135
5,589.52 08/25/09 75.42 73.51
5,589.46 09/22/09 75.48 73 .57
5,589.61 11103/09 75.33 73.42
5,589.92 12/14/09 75.02 73.11
5,590.24 03111110 74.70 72.79
5,590.40 05111110 74.54 72.63
5,590.24 09/29110 74.70 72.79
5,590.49 12/21110 74.45 72.54
5,590.16 02/28/11 74.78 72.87
5,590.44 06/21111 74.50 72.59
5,590.35 09/20/11 74.59 72.68
5,590.67 12/21/11 74.27 72.36
5,590.34 03/27112 74.60 72.69
5,590.32 06/28/12 74.62 72.71
5,589.77 09/27112 75.17 73.26
5,589.67 12/28/12 75.27 73.36
5,589.45 03/28/13 75.49 73.58
5,589.01 06/27/13 75.93 74.02
5,588.99 09/27113 75.95 74.04
5,588.15 12/20/13 76.79 74.88
5,588.50 03/27/14 76.44 74.53
5,588.03 06/25114 76.91 75.00
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -7
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,647.39 5,649.26 1.87 120
5,552.56 08/25/09 96.70 94.83
5,558.34 09/21109 90.92 89.05
5,558.82 11110/09 90.44 88.57
5,558.96 12114/09 90.30 88.43
5,559.54 03/11110 89.72 87.85
5,559.60 05111110 89.66 87.79
5,559.83 09/29110 89.43 87.56
5,559.00 12/21/10 90.26 88.39
5,559.68 02/28111 89.58 87.71
5,560.43 06/21/11 88.83 86.96
5,560.46 09/20/11 88 .80 86.93
5,560.78 12/21111 88.48 86.61
5,560.92 03/27/12 88.34 86.47
5,560.87 06/28112 88.39 86.52
5,561.40 09/27112 87.86 85.99
5,561.50 12/28112 87.76 85.89
5,562.01 03/28/13 87 .25 85.38
5,562.21 06/27113 87.05 85.18
5,562.41 09/27/13 86.85 84.98
5,562.23 12/20/13 87.03 85.16
5,562.85 03/27114 86.41 84.54
5,562.95 06/25114 86.31 84.44
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-14
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,647.80 5,649.53 1.73 135
5,586.18 11104/09 63.35 61.62
5,586.51 12/14/09 63.02 61.29
5,586.71 03/11/10 62.82 61.09
5,586.72 05/11/10 62.81 61.08
5,586.53 09/29/10 63.00 61.27
5,586.80 12/21/10 62.73 61.00
5,586.74 02/28111 62.79 61.06
5,586.84 06/21/11 62.69 60.96
5,586.73 09/20111 62.80 61.07
5,586.98 12/21/11 62.55 60.82
5,587.07 03/27/12 62.46 60.73
5,587.10 06/28112 62.43 60.70
5,587.07 09/27/12 62.46 60.73
5,587.33 12/28/12 62.20 60.47
5,587.43 03/28/13 62.10 60.37
5,587.43 06/27/13 62.10 60.37
5,587.72 09/27/13 61.81 60.08
5,587.22 12/20/13 62.31 60.58
5,587.91 03/27114 61.62 59.89
5,587.74 06/25114 61.79 60.06
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-16
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,651.07 5,652.70 1.63 100
5,603.34 11/04/09 49.36 47.73
5,603.56 12/14/09 49.14 47.51
5,603.84 03111/10 48.86 47.23
5,604.31 05/11/10 48.39 46.76
5,604.28 09/29110 48.42 46.79
5,604.39 12/21/10 48.31 46.68
5,604.20 02/28111 48.50 46.87
5,604.55 06/21/11 48.15 46.52
5,604.74 09/20/11 47.96 46.33
5,604.94 12/21111 47.76 46.13
5,604.84 03/27/12 47.86 46.23
5,604.85 06/28112 47.85 46.22
5,604.99 09/27/12 47.71 46.08
5,605.10 12/28/12 47.60 45.97
5,605.22 03/28/13 47.48 45.85
5,605.11 06/27/13 47.59 45.96
5,605.39 09/27/13 47.31 45.68
5,604.99 12/20/13 47.71 46.08
5,605.71 03/27114 46.99 45.36
5,605.16 06/25114 47.54 45.91
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -18
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,643.95 5,645.45 1.50 100
5,586.85 11/02/09 58.60 57.10
5,600.14 12/14/09 45.31 43.81
5,587.36 03111110 58.09 56.59
5,587.71 05/11/10 57.74 56.24
5,587.50 09/29110 57.95 56.45
5,607.66 12/21110 37.79 36.29
5,587.35 02/28/11 58.10 56.60
5,587.71 06/21111 57.74 56.24
5,587.65 09/20/11 57.80 56.30
5,587.95 12/21/11 57.50 56.00
5,587.05 03/27112 58.40 56.90
5,587.05 06/28/12 58.40 56.90
5,587.50 09/27112 57.95 56.45
5,587.50 12/28112 57.95 56.45
5,587.32 03/28/13 58.13 56.63
5,586.95 06/27/13 58.50 57.00
5,587.02 09/27113 58.43 56.93
5,586.26 12/20/13 59.19 57.69
5,586.87 03/27114 58.58 57.08
5,586.23 06/25/14 59.22 57.72
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -19
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,659.59 5,661.36 1.77 110
5,606.17 11102/09 55.19 53.42
5,606.70 12/14/09 54.66 52.89
5,607.22 03111110 54.14 52.37
5,607.89 05/11110 53.47 51.70
5,607.98 09/29/10 53.38 51.61
5,608.41 12/21110 52.95 51.18
5,608.49 02/28111 52.87 51.10
5,608.60 06/21111 52.76 50.99
5,609.17 09/20111 52.19 50.42
5,608.90 12/21/11 52.46 50.69
5,608.87 03/27112 52.49 50.72
5,608.86 06/28112 52.50 50.73
5,608.86 09/27112 52.50 50.73
5,608.86 12/28112 52.50 50.73
5,609.17 03/28/13 52.19 50.42
5,608.88 06/27113 52.48 50.71
5,608.92 09/27/13 52.44 50.67
5,608.46 12/20113 52.90 51.13
5,608.88 03/27/14 52.48 50.71
5,608.33 06/25/14 53.03 51.26
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well MW -30
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,613.34 5,614.50 1.16 110
5,534.92 10/24/2006 79.58 78.42
5,535.09 3116/2007 79.41 78.25
5,535.46 8/27/2007 79.04 77.88
5,535.06 10115/2007 79.44 78.28
5,535.78 3115/2008 78.72 77.56
5,536.26 6/15/2008 78.24 77.08
5,536.35 9115/2008 78.15 76.99
5,536.68 11115/2008 77.82 76.66
5,535.42 3/15/2009 79.08 77.92
5,537.11 6/30/2009 77.39 76.23
5,536.93 9/10/2009 77.57 76.41
5,537.23 1211112009 77.27 76.11
5,537.59 311112010 76.91 75.75
5,537.85 511112010 76.65 75.49
5,538.37 9/29/2010 76.13 74.97
5537.70 12/2112010 76.8 75.64
5537.67 2/28/2011 76.83 75.67
5538.31 6/2112011 76.19 75.03
5538.15 9/20/2011 76.35 75.19
5538.42 12/2112011 76.08 74.92
5538.54 3/27/2012 75.96 74.8
5538.60 6/28/2012 75.9 74.74
5538.68 9/27/2012 75.82 74.66
5538.99 12/28/2012 75.51 74.35
5539.25 3/28/2013 75.25 74.09
5539.05 6/27/2013 75.45 74.29
5539.60 9/27/2013 74.90 73.74
5539.67 12/20/2013 74.83 73.67
5539.77 3/27/2014 74.73 73.57
5539.40 6/25/2014 75.10 73.94
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well MW-31
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,615.26 5,616.40 1.14 130
5,544.07 10/24/2006 72.33 71.19
5,544.45 3/16/2007 71.95 70.81
5,536.94 8/27/2007 79.46 78.32
5,544.62 10/15/2007 71.78 70.64
5,545.37 3/15/2008 71.03 69.89
5,544.50 6115/2008 71.90 70.76
5,545.94 9/15/2008 70.46 69.32
5,546.42 11115/2008 69.98 68.84
5,546.03 3115/2009 70.37 69.23
5,546.65 6/30/2009 69.75 68.61
5,546.45 9/10/2009 69.95 68.81
5,546.75 1211112009 69.65 68.51
5,547.09 3/1112010 69.31 68.17
5,547.41 5/1112010 68.99 67.85
5,547.28 9/29/2010 69.12 67.98
5547.45 12/2112010 68.95 67.81
5547.37 2/28/2011 69.03 67.89
5547.96 6/2112011 68.44 67.3
5547.65 9/20/2011 68.75 67.61
5548.34 12/2112011 68.06 66.92
5548.30 3/27/2012 68.10 66.96
5548.40 6/28/2012 68.00 66.86
5548.59 9/27/2012 67.81 66.67
5548.91 12/28/2012 67.49 66.35
5549.14 3/28/2013 67.26 66.12
5548.90 6/27/2013 67.50 66.36
5549.25 9/27/2013 67.15 66.01
5549.16 12/20/2013 67.24 66.10
5548.95 3/27/2014 67.45 66.31
5548.60 6/25/2014 67.80 66.66
TabG
Laboratory Analytical Reports
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
2nd Quarter Nitrate 2014
1405196-010
Client Sample ID: Piez-01_05072014
Collection Date: 5/7/2014 933h
Received Date: 5/9/2014 1045h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg!L
--
Date
Analyzed
5/9/2014 1453h
5/15/2014 2130h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
SM4500-Cl-E 5.00 52.1
E353.2 1.00 7.57
Report Date: 5/20/2014 Page 13 of 21
Allannlyses t~pplico.btc to the CWA, SDWA, nnd RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols1 Pcrtincot sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business lnfonnntiou: This report is provided for lhc exclusive usc oflhc
addressee, Privileges of subscqt1ent usc of the name of this company or any member of its stan: or rcprotluction of this rerort in connection with the advertisement, promotion 01 sale of 11ny product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of U1is report
for any purpose other LtHlo for the addr-essee will be grnotcd only on contacL This company accepts no responsibility C.'\cepl for 1ilc due pcrfonnance of inspection ~mtlo1 analysis in good fai1h and according to the rules ofU1c trade and or science ..
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 2nd Quarter Nitrate 2014
Lab Sample ID: 1405196-011
Client Sample ID: Piez-02_05072014
ANALYTICAL LABoRATORIEs Collection Date: 5/7/2014 858h
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-1abs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Received Date: 5/9/2014 1045h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg!L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting Analytical
Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
5/9/2014 1454h SM4500-Cl-E 5.00 11.4
5/1 6/2014 1807h E353.2 0.0100 0.736
Report Date: 5/20/2014 Page 14 of 21
All annly.ses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, nnd RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC prolocols Penincnt sampling infonnation is located on the ali.D.chcd COC Confidential Business lnfonnation: This report is provid~.-d for the exclusive use oftbc
addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of the mune o(this company or any member ofilS stall, or reproduction oflhis report in connection with the nd\•crtisemcnt. promotion 01 sale of;my product or process, or in connection wilh the rc-publkation of this 1cpo11
for any purpose other lhl'ln ror the addressee will be granted only on contacL This company accepl.s no responsibility except ror lhc due pcrronmmce of inspection ami/or analysis in good faith and accmding to the n1les orU1c trade and or science
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
2nd Quarter Nitrate 2014
1405196-012
Client Sample ID: Piez-03_05072014
Collection Date: 5/7/2014 918h
Received Date: 5/9/2014 1045h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Date
Analyzed
5/9/2014 1455h
5/15/2014 2133h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
SM4500-C1-E 5.00 23.9
E353.2 0.100 1.79
Report Date: 5/20/2014 Page 15 of 21
All analyses npplicab\c to Lhc CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnaLion is localcd on the au.ached COC ConfidcntiRI Business lnfonnntion: This report is provided for lhc exclusive usc of the
addressee Privileges of subsequent usc of Lhc name orthis company or any member of its staff, or reproduction oftbis report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of cmy product or process, or in connection wilh the re-publication ol'this rcpmt
for sny purpose olher Lhan for Lhc addressee will be granted only on conLacL This company accepts no responsibility exccpL for lhe due pcrfonnance ofinspccLion nnd/or analysis in good faith and according to the n1les of the lradc and of science.
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awa1-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
2nd Quarter Nitrate 20 14
1405196-003
Client Sample ID: TWN-01_05062014
Collection Date: 5/6/2014 955h
Received Date: 5/9/2014 1045h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Date
Analyzed
5/9/2014 1441h
5/15/2014 2113h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
SM4500-Cl-E 5.00 31.1
E353.2 0.100 1.63
Report Date: 5/20/2014 Page 6 of21
All ann lyses applic:~ble to L~u: CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are pcrfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols Pcrtiuent sampling infonnaLion is localcd on the attached COC Confidential Business lnfonnntion: This report is provided for Lhe exclusive usc of the
addressee Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any mcmbe• of its st:1tT, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale ofony prodm:t or process, orin connection with the re·publicutlon of this report
for any purpose olhcr lhao for lhc addressee will be gnmted only on coutact This company accepts no responsibility except for the due pc1 fonnance of inspection and/or analysis in good faiU1 and according to the n1lcs of the lradc and of science
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 2nd Quarter Nitrate 2014
Lab Sample ID: 1405196-006
Client Sample ID: TWN-02_05072014
Collection Date: 5/7/2014 840h
Received Date: 5/9/2014 1045h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
Chloride mg/L 5/9/2014 1444h SM4500-C1-E 5.00 84.9
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L 5/15/2014 2117h E353.2 10.0 44.7
Report Date: 5/20/2014 Page 9 of 21
All an~ lyses applic~blc Lo the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling inronnation is located on the auachcd COC Confidcntilll Business rnronnr~tion: This report is provided for the exclusive usc oflhc
addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of Lhe name of this comjXlny or any member of its slnlT, or reproduction ofU1is report in connettion with the advcrtiscmcnl, promotion or s.ale ofnny product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report
for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on conLacL This comp::llly ncccpt.s no responsibility except for the due pcrfonnance of inspection nnd/01 analysis in good faith and according to Lhc mlcs ofU1c trade and of science~
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 2nd Quarter Nitrate 2014
Lab Sample ID: 1405196-005
Client Sample ID: TWN-03_05072014
Collection Date: 5/7/2014 831h
Received Date: 5/9/2014 1045h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
Chloride mg!L 5/9/2014 1509h SM4500-Cl-E 25.0 168
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg!L 5/15/2014 2116h E353.2 10.0 23.6
Report Date: 5/20/2014 Page 8 of21
All an<~ lyses applicable lo the CWA, SDWA, nnd RCRA nrc pe1 fanned in acconiancc to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnation is locntcd on the allacbcd COC Confidential Business lnfunnntion: This report is provided for the exclusive usc oftbc
addressee,. Privileges of subsequent use of llle name ofthis company or any mcmbc1 of its st..'liT, or reproduction of this report in connection wilh the ndYertisemenL, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this rcp011
for any purpose other than for the addressee will be graoted only on conlacl This company ncccpl.s no responsibilily except for the due perfonnance of inspection nnd/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of Lbc trade and of science
American West
ANALYTICAl LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: (80 I) 263-8687
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 2nd Quarter Nitrate 2014
Lab Sample ID: 1405196-002
Client Sample ID: TWN-04_05062014
Collection Date: 5/6/2014 835h
Received Date: 5/9/2014 1045h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
Chloride mg/L 5/9/2014 1440h SM4500-Cl-E 5.00 29.6
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) rng/L 5/15/2014 2112h E353.2 0.100 1.55
'-Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
Report Date: 5/20/2014 Page 5 of21
All ann lyses applicable Ia Lhc CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfmmed in accordance lo NE:LAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnation is locaLcd on the allachcd COC Conridcntial Business lnfonnntion: This report is provided for the exclusive usc oft he
addressee Privileges of subsequent usc oflhc name of this company or any member of its st..1IT, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of:my product or process, or in conneclion with Lhc re-publication of this rcpo11
for any purpose olher Lhan for the addressee will be granted only on conlacl Tbis company ncccpts no responsibility cxcepl for lhe due pel fonnance of inspection and/or onalysis in good faith and according Lo Lhe mlcs of lbc lradc and of science
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
2nd Quarter Nitrate 2014
1405196-001
Client Sample ID: TWN-07_05072014
Collection Date: 5/7/2014 821h
Received Date: 5/9/2014 1045h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Date
Analyzed
5/9/2014 1438h
5/1512014 2110h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
SM4500-Cl-E 5.00 5.26
E353.2 0.100 0.564
Report Date: 5/20/2014 Page 4 of 21
All anulyses applic11ble Lo the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perf01med in accordance to NELAC protocols, Pertinent sampling information is located on the allachcd COC Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the
addressee Privileges of subsequent usc of the m1mc oflhis company or any member of its staff, or reproduction oflhis report in connection wilh the ad' ertisement. promotion or sale ofrmy prodt1ct or process, or in connection with the re-publication oflhis report
for any purpose othenhao for lhc addressee will be granted only on contacl This company accepts no responsibility excepL ror the due pe1 ronnance or inspection nndlor analysis in good failh and according lo lhe mlcs or Lhc trade and of science
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: (80 l) 263-8687
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
2nd Quarter Nitrate 2014
1405196-008
Client Sample ID: TWN-07R_05062014
Collection Date: 5/6/2014 737h
Received Date: 5/9/2014 1045h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg!L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Date
Analyzed
5/16/2014 1643h
5/15/2014 2127h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
E300.0 1.00 < 1.00
E353.2 0.100 < 0.100
Report Date: 5/20/2014 Page II of21
All ann lyses applicnblc to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfmmcd in accordance Lo NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnalion is \ocal.ed on the attached COC Conl'idcnlial Business lnfonnntion: This report is provided for the C.'tclusivc usc of the
addressee Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or nny member of i1S st.o.ff, or reproduction of this rL'(lOrt in connection wilh the advertiscmt:nt, prmnoliou or sale ofnny product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report
for any purpose other than for lbc addressee will be granted only on contacl.. This company accepts no responsibility cxc~pl for the due pcrfonnancc of inspection andior analysis in ~;ood faith and according to the rules of lhe tra(lc and of science
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 2nd Quarter Nitrate 2014
Lab Sample ID: 1405196-004
Client Sample ID: TWN-18_05062014
Collection Date: 5/6/2014 1028h
Received Date: 5/9/2014 1045h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
Chloride mg!L 5/9/2014 1442h SM4500-Cl-E 5.00 76.5
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg!L 5/15/2014 2115h E353.2 0.500 2.18
Report Date: 5/20/2014 Page 7 of 21
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc perfonned in accordance to NELAC pro Locals Pertinent samplins information is located on the au.achcd COC Confidenlifll Business lnfonnalion: This report is provided for lhc I:'Xdusive usc of the
addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any member of iLs sL.1.1T, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of nny prodm:t or process, or in connection with the re~publicaLion ortl1is repmt
ror any purpose other Lhrm for lhc addressee will be granted only on ~:onlocL This company accepts no Tcsponslblllty exccpl fonhc due pel ronnancc oflnspeclion and/or analysis lo good raitlland according lo the rules orthc lradc and of science
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 2nd Quarter Nitrate 2014
Lab Sample ID: 1405196-009
Client Sample ID: TWN-60_05082014
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIEs Collection Date: 5/8/2014 730h
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Received Date: 5/9/2014 1045h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg!L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting Analytical
Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
5/16/2014 1730h E300.0 1.00 < 1.00
5115/2014 2129h E353.2 0.100 < 0.100
Report Date: 5/20/2014 Page 12 of 21
All anAlyses applicable to th~ CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are p~:1 formed in accordance to NE.LAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnatioo is located on the attached COC. Cool'idcntial Business lnfonnation: This report is provid~o:cl for the cxclusi\'C usc oftbc
addressee Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its stnfT, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale ofnny product or J>rOccss, or in connection with the re-publication of this 1epo1t
for any purpose other lhan for the addressee will be grnotcd only on contacl This company accepts no responsibility except for I he du~ pc1fonnance of inspection andior anttlysis in good faith aod according lo the ndcs of the trade aud of science.
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 2nd Quarter Nitrate 2014
Lab Sample ID: 1405196-007
Client Sample ID: TWN-65_05062014
ANALYTICAL LABoRAToRIEs Collection Date: 5/6/2014 835h
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awa1-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Received Date: 5/9/2014 1045h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting Analytical
Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
5/9/2014 1446h SM4500-Cl-E 5.00 26.6
5/15/2014 2126h E353.2 0.100 1.54
Report Date: 5/20/2014 Page 10 of21
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accmdancc to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC Confidential Business lnfonnnlirm: This report is provided for Lhe cx.clusivc usc of the
addressee Privileges ofsubscqucntusc oflhc name of this company or any member of its slnlT. or reproduction oflhis report in connection with the ndvcrtiscmcnL, promotion or sale of any pTOduct or process, orin connection with the re-publication of this rcpm1
for any purpose olher Lh<ln for the addressee will be granted only on contact This company accepts 110 responsibilify except for1he due pcrronnancc or inspcclion and/or analysis in good faith and according Lo the mlc.s oflhe 1rade and of science
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax:[phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
2nd Quarter Chloroform 2014
1405494-029
Client Sample ID: TW4-22_05192014
Collection Date: 5119/2014 1245h
Received Date: 5/23/2014 1015h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Date
Analyzed
6/3/20!4 l635h
5127/20!4 2145h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
E300.0 100 614
E353.2 10.0 47.2
Report Date: 6/5/2014 Page 36 of82
All ann lyses appli~.:nblc to the CWA, SDWA, .:md RCRA arc p.-flifrmN in M'tftUlv;ts-~ '0-A( 1\I.UWC'tll"-i•(nw;m.uuwJiot Wtmnalion is located on the auacbcd COC. Conlidcntial Business Jnfomlntion: This rcpon is provided for the exclusive usc of the
addressee. Privileges 1>fsubscqucnt usc or the name of this cMlp.m)' (Iran)' nlct'INU(il~~o \L:!O:tlt'fL'J11t't,fUC1~ rol'duuqxlf1 iuronncction with the ildvcrtiS~..··mcnl, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication or this repo1t
for any purpose olhc1 lhao for the addressee will be gmnlcd onlyOrt~ltlt't-rhl~~o~mptfTI)"~to , "'IIIKHit•tlilf~...a=ll\ (~ ll'w' due pcrfonnancc of inspection "nJ/or analysis in good failh and according to the rules oflhc t1adcand of science
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 2014
Lab Sample ID: 1405494-021
Client Sample ID: TW4-24_05192014
ANAlYTICAl lABORAToRIEs Collection Date: 5119/2014 1230h
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Received Date: 5/23/2014 10 15h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting Analytical
Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
6/3/2014 1327h E300.0 100 1,020
5/27/2014 2126h E353.2 5.00 35.0
Report Date: 6/5/2014 Page 28 of82
All annlysc5 applicabl~ lo the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA ore IX'Lformcd in accordance to NELAC protocols Pcnincn! sampling infonnation is located on !he auachcd COC. Confidential Busiocss rnfonnalion: This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the
addJc.'~scc Privileges of subsequent use of the name of tbis comp3ny or any member or ils statT, or reproduction of this report in connCl!tion with the ildvertis...-,nent, promotion or sale of:my product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this rep011
for anr Jmrposc olher than for lhc addressee will be granled only on contact This company accepts no rcsponsibilily CJ\~~pl for !he du~ pcrfonnancc of inspection and/or analysis in good faith aod according lo 1hc mles oflhc trade and or science..
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: (80 l) 263-8687
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 2014
Lab Sample ID: 1405494-014
Client Sample ID: TW4-25_05192014
Collection Date: 5/19/2014 1215h
Received Date: 5/23/2014 10 ISh
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Date
Analyzed
5/28/20\4 038h
5/27/2014 21\3h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
E300.0 50.0 51.1
E353.2 0.100 1.21
Report Date: 6/5/2014 Page 21 of82
All anrtlyscs Hpplicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc pl'l fonncrl in accordance lO NELAC pro Loco Is Pcn.incol sampling infonnntion is located on the allachcd COC Confidential Business lnformiltion: This report is provided for the cxclusi\'C usc of the
addressee Privilcg.cs of subsequent usc oflhc name of this company or any member of ilS stall, or reproductinn of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of Hn)' product or process, or in connL>crion with the rc·pubJication t>f lhis r~port
for any purpose other thao for the addressee will be gran1cd only on contact This company accepts no rcsponsibilily cxc~rt for the due pcr(onnance of inspcrtioo and/or analysis in good failh and according to th~ mlcs oflhc trade and of science
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 2014
Lab Sample ID: 1405562-007C
Client Sample ID: TW4-60_05272014
ANAlVTicAL LAeoRAroAirs Collection Date: 5/27/2014 1015h
Received Date: 5/28/20 14 940h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 5/29/2014 1255h
Units: )lg/L Dilution Factor:
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: (80 I) 263-8687
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Compound
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Surrogate
Surr: I ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromotluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
CAS Result
17060-07-0 51.4
460-00-4 49.9
1868-53-7 47.7
2037-26-5 49.0
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Test Code: 8260-W
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
Method: SW8260C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
56-23-5 1.00 < 1.00
67-66-3 1.00 < 1.00
74-87-3 1.00 < 1.00
75-09-2 1.00 < 1.00
Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
50.00 103 72-151
50.00 99.8 80-128
50.00 95.4 80-124
50.00 97.9 77-129
Report Date: 6/5/2014 Page 19 of31
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA,und RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling informalion is located on the au.achcd COC Confidcntioll Business rnfonn:ltion: This report is provided for the exclusi\'C usc of the
nddrcsscc Privileges or subsequent use or lhc name n(1his com[XJn}' or any member of its st<~rf, or reproduction of I his report in conncclion with Lbc :td\•crtisemenl. promotion or sale of :lny producl or process, or in connection wilh the rc-publie>~tion of this n:port
for any purpose other than for the ucldrcs5ce will be granted only on conl<lcl This company uc<:cpt:i no rcsponllibilily except for Lbc due pcrfonnance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the mlc.s of the 11 ode and of science
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: (80 I) 263-8686
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Garrin Palmer
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
TEL: [phone]
RE: 2nd Quarter Nitrate 2014
Dear Garrin Palmer: Lab Set ID: 1405196
American West Analytical Laboratories received 12 sample(s) on 5/9/2014 for the
analyses presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AWAL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) in Utah and Texas; and is
state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, and Missouri.
All analyses were performed in accordance to the NELAP protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation scope documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
Thank You, Digitally signed by Jose G
G Rocha
DN: cn=Jose G. Rocha,
• o=American West Analytical Jose
Rocha
laboratories, ou=Qualily
AS~Hifi.1neo Ollk:Er,
omail=[e-mail],
<:=US
P<ll :2014.0.5.20 12:08:46 Approved by: .__ _______ -o_s_·oo_· ____ ____,
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 5/20/2014 Page 1 of 2 I
All analyses applicable to lhc CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc pet fonncd in accordance Lo NELAC prolocols Pertinent sampling information is locnlcd on the auachctl COC Conftdcmial Business lnfomu1Lion: Tl1is report is p1ovic.l!!rl for the cxr.;\usivc usc orthc
addressee Pri-..ilrgcs of subsequent use ofLhc name of this company or any member of its stniT, or reproduction ofthis report in connection wiLh Lhe ad\'ertisement.. prommion or sale ornny product or process, OJ in connection with the rc~public3tion of this rcpo11
ror <my Jmrposc olhc1 lhnn ror lhc: addressee will be granted only on l'Ontact This company acccpl.s no rcspon!>ibilily cxccpl fort he due pc1 fonnancc of inspection and/or analysis in good faitll and acc01ding to the rules oflbc trade and of science
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES Project: 2nd Quarter Nitrate 2014
Lab Set ID: 1405196
Date Received: 5/9/2014 1045h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
463 West 3600 South
1405196-001A TWN-07 05072014 517/2014 821h Aqueous Chloride, Aqueous
Salt Lake City, UT 84115 1405196-0018 TWN-07 05072014 517/2014 821h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1405196-002A TWN-04_05062014 5/6/2014 835h Aqueous Chloride, Aqueous
1405196-0028 TWN-04_05062014 5/6/2014 835h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Phone: [phone] 1405196-003A TWN-01 05062014 5/6/2014 955h Aqueous Chloride, Aqueous
Toll Free: [phone] 1405196-0038 TWN-01 05062014 5/6/2014 955h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Fax: (80 I) 263-8687 1405196-004A TWN-18_05062014 5/6/2014 1028h Aqueous Chloride, Aqueous
1405196-0048 TWN-18_05062014 5/6/2014 1028h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
e-mail: [e-mail] 1405196-005A TWN-03_05072014 517/2014 83lh Aqueous Chloride, Aqueous
1405196-0058 TWN -03 _ 05072014 517/2014 831h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2 web: www.awal-labs.com 1405196-006A TWN-02_05072014 517/2014 840h Aqueous Chloride, Aqueous
1405196-0068 TWN-02_05072014 517/2014 840h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1405196-007A TWN-65 05062014 5/6/2014 835h Aqueous Chloride, Aqueous
Kyle F. Gross 1405196-0078 TWN-65_05062014 5/6/2014 835h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Laboratory Director 1405196-008A TWN-07R_05062014 5/6/2014 737h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1405196-0088 TWN -07R _ 05062014 5/6/2014 737h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Jose Rocha 1405196-009A TWN-60_05082014 5/8/2014 730h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
QA Officer 1405196-0098 TWN-60 05082014 5/8/2014 730h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1405196-0lOA Piez-01_05072014 517/2014 933h Aqueous Chloride, Aqueous
1405196-0108 Piez-01 _05072014 517/2014 933h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1405196-011A Piez-02 05072014 517/2014 858h Aqueous Chloride, Aqueous
1405196-0118 Piez-02 05072014 517/2014 858h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1405196-012A Piez-03 05072014 517/2014 918h Aqueous Chloride, Aqueous
1405196-0128 Piez-03 _ 05072014 517/2014 918h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Report Date: 5/20/2014 Page 2 of21
All ann lyses applicable to th~ C\VA, SDWA, and RCRA arc pc1 fanned in accorda11CC to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling in[onnstirm is loc:ncd on the auacbcd CDC Confidential Business lnfonnntion: This report is provided for the e~clusi\'C usc of the
addrc!'lsec. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any mcmbc• of iLS sta/T, ur rcp10duction of this report in cmmcction wiLh the advertisemcnL. promotion or sale or nny produet or proress, or in connection with 1hc re-publication of this rcpot1
for any purpose olher than for the addressee will be granled only on conlact This cotnpany accepts no responsibility e.'icepl for the due pc1 fonnance of inspection andior aoalysis in good failh and according 1o the mles oflhe trade and of science
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Inorganic Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
2nd Quarter Nitrate 2014
1405196
5/9/2014
5/6/14 -5/8/14
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation for the
samples were performed within the method holding times. The samples were properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, LCSD, MS, MSD, RPD, DUP:
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Sample I Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate
(LCS/LCSD): All LCS and LCSD recoveries were within control limits,
indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, with the
following exceptions:
I Sample ID Analvte QC Explanation
.I 1405196-002A Chloride MS Sample matrix interference
I 1405337-006B Chloride MS Sample matrix interference
Duplicate (DUP): The parameters that required a duplicate analysis had RPDs
within the control limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 5/20/2014 Page 3 of21
All ann lyses applicable Lo the CWA, SDWA, nnd RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnation is locaLcd on the allachcd COC, ConfidentiAl Business Jnfonmtion: This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the
addressee Privileges of subsequent usc of the name ofthis company or any member of its st.1IT, or reproduction oflhis report io connection with the advertiscmenL. prmnotion or sale ofnny product or process, 01 in connection with the rc.publicotion of this report
fm· any purpose other Lhan for Lhc lldd.-csscc will be granled only on conl<lcl This company accepts no responsibility except ror the due pel fonnancc of inspection and/or analysis in good faiLh and according to the n1lcs orLhc trade and of science
ANAlYTICAl
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1405196
Project: 2nd Quarter Nitrate 2014
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: 1405196-0llBDUP Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.725
Units
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
QCType: DUP
Reporting Amount Spike Ref.
Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC
05/16/20 14 1808h
m!!IL E353.2 0.00368 0.0100
Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit
0.765 5.37 20
Qual
Report Date: 5/20/2014 Page 16 of21
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling informacion is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business lnformation: This report is provided fo1 the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the
name of this company or any member of its staff. or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion Ol' sale of any product or process, or· in connection with che re-publication of this report fo1 any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This
company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1405196
Project: 2nd Quarter Nitrate 2014
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R69027 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 5.21
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R68640 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: CL-W -4500CLE
Chloride 24.8
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R68938 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.996
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R69010 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.01
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked
05/16/2014 1350h
mg/L E300.0 0.00623 0.100 5.000 -05/09/2014 1436h
mg/L SM4500-Cl-E 0.965 5.00 25.00
05/15/2014 2109h
mg/L E353.2 0.00368 0.100 1.000
05116/2014 1731h
mg/L E353.2 0.00368 0.0100 1.000
Garrin Palmer
we
LCS
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
0 104
0 99.3
0 99.6
0 101
Limits
90-110
90-110
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 5/20/2014 Page I 7 of 21
Al1 analyses applicable to I he CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent samplins information is located Oil the attachc:d COC. Confidt:ntial Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the
m1me of this company or any member of its staff. or reproduction of this report in connection wirh th~ advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the: re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact,. This
company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science~
LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1405196
Project: 2nd Quarter Nitrate 2014
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: LCSD-R68640 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: CL-W-4500CLE
Chloride 24.8
Units
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-1abs.com
OC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount
Method MDL Limit Spiked
Garrin Palmer
we
LCSD
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
05/09/2014 1437h
mg/L SM4500-Cl-E 0.965 5.00 25.00 0 99.1
Limits
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit
24.8 0.121 10
Qual
Report Date: 5/20/2014 Page 18 of 21
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertineot sampling information is located on the attached COC Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee_ Privileges of subsequent use of the
name ofthis company or any member of its staff, or rt!production of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This
company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1405196
Project: 2nd Quarter Nitrate 2014
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: MB-R69027 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride < 0.100
Lab Sample ID: MB-R68640 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: CL-W-4500CLE
Chloride <5.00
Lab Sample ID: MB-R68938 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) < 0.100
Lab Sample ID: MB-R69010 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) <0.0100
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked
05/16/2014 1334h
mg/L E300.0 0.00623 0.100 -05/09/2014 1435h
mg/L SM4500-CI-E 0.965 5.00
05/15/2014 21 08h
mg/L E353.2 0.00368 0.100
05/16/2014 1729h
mg/L E353.2 0.00368 0.0100
Garrin Palmer
we
MBLK
Spike Rer.
Amount %REC Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRer. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 5/20/2014 Page 19 of21
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDW A. and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on lhe attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileses of subsequent use of the
name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with th~ advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose othe1 than for the addressee wi II be granted only on contact This
company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfonnance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science,
ANALYTICAL
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: (801 ) 263-8686, Toll Free: [phone], Fax: (801 ) 263-8687
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we Lab Set ID: 1405196
Project: 2nd Quarter Nitrate 2014 QC Type: MS
Reporting Amount Spike Ref.
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC
Lab Sample ID: 1405196-00SAMS Date Analyzed: 05/16/2014 1659h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.85 mg/L E300.0 0.00623 0.100 5.000 0 96.9 -Lab Sample ID: 1405337-006BMS Date Analyzed: 05/16/2014 1849h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 2,400 mg/L E300.0 3.12 50.0 2,500 200 88.1
Lab Sample ID: 1405196-00l~S Date Analyzed: 05/09/2014 15 I I h
Test Code: CL-W-4500CLE
Chloride 41.1 mg/L SM4500-Cl-E 0.965 5.00 10.00 29.6 114
Lab Sample ID: 1405196-00JBMS Date Analyzed: 05/15/2014 2119h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.63 rngfL E353.2 0.00368 0.100 1.000 0.564 107
1 -Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix inteiference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
Limits
90-110
90-I 10
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt o/o RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 5/20/2014 Page 20 of 21
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocolsf Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This teport is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the
name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone] Laboratory Director
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awa1-1abs.com
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES QC SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Lab Set ID: 1405196 Dept: we
Project: 2nd Quarter Nitrate 2014 QC Type: MSD
Reporting Amount Spike Ref. RPDRef. RPD
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC Limits Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Lab Sample ID: 1405196-00SAMSD Date Analyzed: 05/16/2014 1715h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 5.18 mg/L E300.0 0.00623 0.100 5.000 0 104 90-110 4.85 6.64 20
Lab Sample ID: 1405337-006BMSD Date Analyzed: 05/16/2014 1905h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 2,870 mg/L E300.0 3.12 50.0 2,500 200 107 90-110 2400 17.6 20
Lab Sample ID: 1405196-002AMSD Date Analyzed: 05/09/2014 1512h
Test Code: CL-W-4500CLE
Chloride 39.2 mg/L SM4500-Cl-E 0.965 5.00 10.00 29.6 95.9 90-110 41.1 4.60 10
Lab Sample ID: 1405196-001BMSD Date Analyzed: 05/15/2014 2120h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.60 mg/L E353.2 0.00368 0.100 1.000 0.564 104 90-110 1.63 1.64 10
Report Date: 5/20/2014 Page 21 of 21
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the l.lddressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the
name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion m·sale of any product 01 process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report fm any purpose other than for the adl.iressee will be granted only on contact This
company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfonnance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
UL
American West Analytical Laboratories REVISED: 5116/2014 Denison
Samples #8 and #9 moved to 300.0-W to achieve desired
PQLs. MC
WORK ORDER Summary WorkOrder: 1405196 Page I of2
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 5/20/2014
Client ID: DENlOO Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 2nd Quarter Nitrate 2014 QC Level: III WO Type: Project
Comments: PA Rush. QC 3 (Summary/No chromatograms). MUST report project specific DL's: Cl @ 1 mg/L, N02/N03 @ 0.1 mg/L. EDD-Denison & LOCUS. AC Email Group;
SampleiD Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1405196-00IA TWN -07 _ 05072014 5/7/2014 0821h 5/9/2014 1045h CL-W -4500CLE Aqueous ll df-cl
1405196-00 lB N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Ana/ytes: N03N02N
1405196-002A TWN-04_05062014 5/6/2014 0835h 5/9/2014 1045h CL-W -4500CLE Aqueous D df-cl
1405196-002B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1405196-003A TWN-01_05062014 5/6/2014 0955h 5/9/2014 I 045h CL-W-4500CLE Aqueous D df-cl
1405196-003B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL tfl!a1JIIes; N03N02N
1405196-004A TWN-18_05062014 5/6/2014 I 028h 5/9/2014 I 045h CL-W -4500CLE Aqueous D df-cl
1405196-004B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1405196-005A TWN-03 05072014 5/7/2014 0831 h 5/9/2014 I 045h CL-W -4500CLE Aqueous D df-cl
1405196-005B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1405196-006A TWN-02 _05072014 5/7/2014 0840h 5/9/2014 1045h CL-W -4500CLE Aqueous [_I df-cl
1405196-006B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1405196-007 A TWN-65 05062014 5/6/2014 0835h 5/9/2014 1045h CL-W-4500CLE Aqueous D df-cl
1405196-007B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1405196-00SA TWN-07R_05062014 5/6/2014 073 7h 5/9/2014 1045h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
I SEL t1no{~ltfS: CL
1405196-00SB N02/N03-W -353.2 tv' df-no2/no3
1 SEL Am~lyres: N03N02N
1405196-009A TWN-60_05082014 5/8/2014 0730h 5/9/2014 1045h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1405196-009B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL Ana/ytes: N03N02N
Printed: 5/16/2014 FOR LAB ORA TORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M [L( RT [2J / / CN Jzl TAT [Z{ QC lZJ~ I / HOK DB ----HOK_~~ HOK____ COCEmailed_~L~fJj: AC
WORK ORDER Summary WorkOrder: 1405196 Page 2 of2
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 5/20/2014
SampleiD Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1405196-010A Piez-01 05072014 5/7/2014 0933h 5/9/2014 1045h CL-W -4500CLE Aqueous r df-cl L___
1405196-0IOB N02/N03-W -353.2 [;. df-no2/no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1405196-011A l'iez-02 05072014 5/7/2014 0858h 5/9/2014 1 045h CL-W-4500CLE Aqueous df-cl
1405196-011B N02/N03-W-353.2 ..., df-no2/no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1405196-012A Piez-03 _ 05072014 5/7/2014 0918h 5/9/2014 1045h CL-W-4500CLE Aqueous df-cl
1405196-012B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
Printed: 5/16/2014 FORLABORATORYUSEONLY[filloutonpage1]: o/oM 0 RT 0 CN 0 TAT 0 QCO HOK ___ _ HOK ___ _ HOK_ _ _ _ COC Emailed ______ _
American West
Analytical Laboratories
463 W. 3600 S. Salt lake City, UT 84115
Phone # (801) 26&8686 Toll Free# [phone]
Fax# [phone] Email [e-mail]
www.awal-labs.com
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc-
Address: 6425 s_ Hwy. 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Phone#: [phone] . ~#:
E
.
1
. gpaliile<@eilergyf1ie!S.com; KWeiDel@energyfu:;e!Sr.:;.c:;o:;;m;;:.---------
mal. dtar~com ,
Project Name: 2nd Quarter Nitrate 2014
Project#:
PO#:
Sampler Name: Tanner Holliday
:ellhqulahed by: I Date:
Signature
me:
~rintName:
~eiinquished oy: Date:
Signature
Time:
Print Name:
Reunqutshea ·oy: Date:
Signature
ITime:
Print Name:
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
All ana/ySI)s wm be conducted uslng NELAP accredited methods and all data \'All be reported using AWAL's atandard analyte lists and rep:lrtlng
limits (POL) unless specifically requested otherwiee on this Chain of Custody and/or attached documantaUon
t40SLot~
AWAL Lab Sample Set#
Page 1 of 1 I QC Level: I Tum Around Time: ur;oosotherarrangomontohavebaenmodo. ~Uii:Dllfo~;::~ -~-.~_ ·~ ~-.;, ... ~-u]
slgnod reports vrill be emailed by 5:00pm on f1 ~ -.'f... · L:,• •
3 Standard lhadaythoyaredue. 1;.. ~-~·---·~1:' . '; • ·.~;..:..: '""-~ ;-:t~~-,.
I I I l I I I l I I I I l I ~ lnclu~~~~~:UPLOAD ~-~ --· ~-
Date:
i11mej
nata:
nm~
Data:
nmo:
EXCEL
Field Filtered For.
Analysis
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
N02&N03
O&G
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TP04
Procedure:
Frequency:
Preservation Check Sheet
Preservative f-t:t-..l l..-r:n'2.--DO~ 1.-......\..l -t"-t-h knl/)
pH <2 H2S04
oH<2H2S04
pH>12
NaOH
oH<2HN01
oH<2H2S04 l\u:>5~ Ve_,'S. I~ 1\Jc;. 1\/.fi'S... l\J.e-'::>
pH<2HCL I I r T
pH<2 H2S04
pH>9NaOH,
Zn Acetate
pH<2 H2S04
pH <2 H2S04
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from Lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
s -----------------
-ern k,nR ~of-PI
J~ N~ .ve..-~
I I I
h-in -nll
ve<.. vo.S...
I
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
If sample is not preserved, properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag COC, notify client if requested
Place client conversation on COC
Samples may be adjusted
All samples requiring preservation
*
+
....
#
•
The sample required additional preservative upon receipt.
The sample was received unpreserved
The Sample was received unpreserved and therefore preserved upon receipt.
The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH < 2 due to the sample matrix
The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH> __ due to the sample matrix interference
LabSetiD: }L/, OS lCz(e
-orz ..
lv~
I
ANALYTICA L LABORATOFfi[S
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Garrin Palmer
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
TEL: [phone]
RE: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 2014
Dear Garrin Palmer: Lab Set ID: 1405494
American West Analytical Laboratories received 33 sample(s) on 5/23/2014 for the
analyses presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AWAL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) in Utah and Texas; and is
state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, and Missouri.
All analyses were performed in accordance to the NELAP protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation scope documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
Thank: You, Ky I e F . Digitally signed by Kyle F. Gross
ON: cn=Kyle F. Gross, o=AWAL,
ou=AWAL-Laboratory Director,
G email=kyle@awal-labs com, c=US r 0 s s Dale: 2014 06,0512:59:17 -06'00'
Approvedby: ~--------------------~
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 6/5/2014 Page I of82
All an:~lys('s npplitable to the C\V A, SOW A, nnd RCRA arc pcrfom1cd in accordance to NELAC' protocols Pertinent sampling infonnatioo is localCd on the auachcd COC Coofidcmial Business lnfonn111ion: This report is provid"'-d for the cxt::lusiH:-usc of the
addressee Privilc~cs of subsequent usc of lhc name of this company or any mcmbc1 of iLs sLaiT. or reproduction llfthis report in connC\:tion with the ad,·crtiM:mcnt. promotion or sail! of 4lny product or process, 01 in connection with the re-publication of this report
fnr any purpos\: other than for the addressee will be granted only on contncL This company accepts no responsibility except for the due pcrfonnancc of inspection amllor analysis in good faith and according 10 the n1lcs of lhc trade and of science
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
AU,.IY'flCAl LAB ORATORIES Project: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 2014
Lab SetiD: 1405494
Date Received: 5/23/2014 1015h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
463 West 3600 South
1405494-001 A TW4-03R_05192014 5/19/2014 1500h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Salt Lake City, UT 84115 1405494-00 1B TW4-03R_05192014 5/19/2014 1500h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1405494-001 c TW4-03R_05192014 5/19/2014 1500h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Phone: [phone] 1405494-002A TW4-03 05212014 5/2112014 706h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
140 54 94-002B TW4-03_05212014 5/2112014 706h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Toll Free: [phone] 1405494-002C TW4-03_05212014 5/2112014 706h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Fax: [phone]C/5030C
e-mail: [e-mail] 1405494-003A TW4-12 05212014 5/21/2014 725h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1405494-003B TW4-12_05212014 5/21/2014 725h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
web: www.awal-labs.com 1405494-003C TW4-12_05212014 5/21/2014 725h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1405494-004A TW4-28 05212014 5/21/2014 733h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Kyle F. Gross 1405494-004B TW4-28_05212014 5/21/2014 733h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1405494-004C TW4-28_05212014 5/21/2014 733h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Laboratory Director 8260C/5030C
1405494-005A TW4-32 05212014 5/21/2014 738h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Jose Rocha 1405494-005B TW4-32 05212014 5/21/2014 738h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
QA Officer 1405494-005C TW4-32_052120 14 5/21/2014 738h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1405494-006A TW4-13_05212014 5/21/2014 745h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1405494-006B TW4-13_05212014 5/21/2014 745h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1405494-006C TW4-13_05212014 5/2112014 745h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1405494-007 A TW4-14_05212014 5/21/2014 752h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1405494-00?B TW4-14 05212014 5/2112014 752h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1405494-00?C TW4-14_05212014 5/21/2014 752h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1405494-00SA TW4-27_05212014 5/21/2014 800h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1405494-008B TW4-27 05212014 5/21/2014 800h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1405494-008C TW4-27_05212014 5/21/2014 800h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1405494-009A TW4-30 05212014 5/21/2014 808h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1405494-009B TW4-30_05212014 5/21/2014 808h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1405494-009C TW4-30 05212014 5/21/2014 808h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1405494-010A TW4-31_05212014 5/21/2014 815h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1405494-01 OB TW4-31_05212014 5/2112014 815h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Report Date: 6/5/2014 Page 2 of82
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, nnd RCRA are p~:• formed in accordance lo NELAC protocols Pertinent !>ampling infonnation is located oo the annrhcd COC Confidential Business rnfonnation: This report is provided for lhc cxclusiYe usc t>f Lbc
3ddrcssce Privilegc.o; of subsequent usc oflhe name of this company or any mcmbc1 of its sin IT. or reproduction of this report in connection with the ndvcrtiscmcn(. promotion or sale or any product or process, or ln connection with the re-publication ortJ1is rt'pOrt
ror any purpose other lh:~n for \he addressee will be granted only on contacL This company ~cccpts no responsibility cx..::cpt for the due pcrronnancc or inspection andior analysis in good rait.b and according 1o tl1c mlcs of the trade and or science
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 20 14
Lab Set ID: 1405494
Date Received: 5/23/2014 1015h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
1405494-01 oc TW4-31_05212014 5/2112014 815h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
463 West 3600 South 8260C/5030C
1405494-011A TW4-34_05212014 5/2112014 823h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Salt Lake City, UT 84115 1405494-011B TW4-34_05212014 5/2112014 823h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1405494-011 c TW4-34_05212014 5/21/2014 823h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1405494-0 12A TW4-23_05212014 5/2112014 831h Aqueous Anions, E300.0 Phone: [phone] 1405494-0 12B TW4-23_05212014 5/21/2014 831h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Toll Free: [phone] 1405494-0 12C TW4-23_05212014 5/2112014 831h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Fax: [phone]C/5030C
e-mail: [e-mail] 1405494-0 13A TW4-09 _05212014 5/2112014 841h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1405494-013B TW4-09_05212014 5/2112014 841h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
web: www.awal-labs.com 1405494-0BC TW4-09_05212014 5/2112014 841h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1405494-0 14A TW4-25_05192014 5119/2014 1215h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1405494-014B TW4-25_05192014 5/19/2014 1215h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Kyle F. Gross 1405494-0 l4C TW4-25 05192014 5119/2014 1215h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Laboratory Director 8260C/5030C
1405494-015A TW4-26_05212014 5/2112014 900h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Jose Rocha 1405494-015B TW4-26 05212014 5/2112014 900h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
QA Officer 1405494-015C TW4-26 05212014 5/2112014 900h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1405494-0 16A TW4-06_05222014 5/22/2014 655h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1405494-0 16B TW4-06_05222014 5/22/2014 655h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1405494-0 16C TW4-06 05222014 5/22/2014 655h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1405494-017 A TW4-16 05222014 5/22/2014 713h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1405494-0 17B TW4-16_05222014 5/22/2014 713h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1405494-017C TW4-16 05222014 5/22/2014 713h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1405494-0 18A TW4-05 05222014 5/22/2014 720h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1405494-018B TW4-05_05222014 5/22/2014 720h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1405494-0 18C TW4-05 05222014 5/22/2014 720h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1405494-019A TW4-18_05222014 5/22/2014 727h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1405494-0 19B TW4-18_05222014 5/22/2014 727h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1405494-0 19C TW4-18 05222014 5/22/2014 727h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1405494-020A TW4-08_05222014 5/22/2014 750h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1405494-020B TW4-08_05222014 5/22/2014 750h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Report Date: 6/5/2014 Page 3 of82
A It analyses applicnblc to the C\VA, SO \VA, nnd RCRA are perfom1cd in accordance to NELAC proLOcols Pertinent sampling infonnation is localed on the au.ached COC Coofidential Business rnfonnalion: This report is providl.'tl for the cxclusi\·c usc of the
addressee. Privileges llf subsequent use or Ute name of Lbis company or any member of its s\.JlJT, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advcrtisemcnl, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection wiLh Lhc re·publication of this rl.!port
for any purpose olhcr lhao for the addressee will be granted only on contncL This company ;:u:ccpts no responsibility cxc~pl for the do~ pcrfonnancc nfiospccLion anJ/or analysis io good faith aod according to t.hc mles nfUtc trade and of science.
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 2014
Lab Set ID: 1405494
Date Received: 5/23/2014 1015h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
1405494-020C TVV4-08 05222014 5/22/2014 750h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
463 West 3600 South 8260C/5030C
1405494-021A TVV4-24_05192014 5/19/2014 1230h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Salt Lake City, UT 84115 1405494-0218 TVV4-24 05192014 5119/2014 1230h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1405494-021C TVV4-24 05192014 5/19/2014 1230h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1405494-022A TVV4-33 05222014 5/22/2014 756h Aqueous Anions, E300.0 Phone:[phone] 1405494-0228 TVV4-33 05222014 5/22/2014 756h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Toll Free: [phone] 1405494-022C TVV4-33 05222014 5/22/2014 756h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Fax: [phone]C/5030C
e-mail: [e-mail] 1405494-023A TW4-21_05222014 5/22/2014 807h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1405494-0238 TVV4-21_05222014 5/22/2014 807h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
web: www.awal-labs.com 1405494-023C TVV4-21 05222014 5/22/2014 807h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1405494-024A TVV4-29_05222014 5/22/2014 820h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1405494-0248 TVV4-29_05222014 5/22/2014 820h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2 Kyle F. Gross 1405494-024C TVV4-29_05222014 5/22/2014 820h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Laboratory Director 8260C/5030C
1405494-025A TVV4-l9_05192014 5/19/2014 1035h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Jose Rocha 1405494-0258 TVV4-19 __ 05192014 5119/2014 1035h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
QA Officer 1405494-025C TVV4-19_05192014 5119/2014 1035h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1405494-026A TVV4-04 __ 95192014 5119/2014 1410h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1405494-0268 TVV4-04_05192014 5/19/2014 1410h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1405494-026C TVV4-04_05192014 5/19/2014 1410h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1405494-027 A MVV-04_05192014 5/19/2014 1400h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1405494-0278 MVV-04_05192014 5/19/2014 1400h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1405494-027C MVV-04 05192014 5119/2014 1400h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1405494-028A MVV-26 05192014 5119/2014 1350h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1405494-0288 MVV-26_05192014 5/19/2014 1350h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1405494-028C MVV-26_05192014 5/19/2014 1350b Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1405494-029A TVV4-22_05192014 5119/2014 1245b Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1405494-0298 TVV4-22 _051920 14 5/19/2014 1245h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1405494-029C TVV4-22 05192014 5/19/2014 1245h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1405494-030A TW4-20 05192014 5/19/2014 1255h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1405494-0308 TVV4-20_05192014 5/19/2014 1255h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Report Date: 6/5/2014 Page 4 of82
All~~~ lQ J,lli~l&tJDlhf (;\VA.SI)WA, and RCRAQra (l;n'f~ In ~'i~n:tf!. 'l!l A "f!W-il<~ •·~·u~~r•lln inliinntl.uno is locat.cd on the au.achcd COC. Confidential Business h1formalion: This report is provided ror the exclusive usc orlhc ~fllttJ5«. I'll\ J,. '' ltf ,uf,:tcJIIn"tJ ott-He name ofthlstWJtfUD ttt ~n) mCJ.tlbtr drlll.~~oliUY. ut rtlliOauc1hm orthtlll f~l m cmmc.,wg with the advcrtiS~..-'111Cnl. promotion or sale of any pToducl or process, orin conneetion with the rc-pubJicatlon ofll1is report
frn rn~· Jltl~t t~-JIH:T 1tt;_. (t'M'fhi: oddt\!Dcc will be grant"'l ~~Ytlfl t:t~q~L 1lu1-CnrTTJ1RO}' ~~ rm ~•IMtT,III~llly ~ n.-1llt' due pcrfonnancc of inspection and/or analysis in good failh and according to the mks of Lhc trade aud ofscicncc.
ANAlYTICAl LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Client:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Date Received:
Lab Sample ID
1405494-030C
1405494-031A
1405494-031B
1405494-031 c
1405494-032A
1405494-032B
1405494-032C
1405494-033A
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
2nd Quarter Chloroform 2014
1405494
5/23/2014 10 15h
Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
TW4-20 05192014 5/19/2014 l255h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
TW4-65_05212014 5/21/2014 725h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
TW4-65_05212014 5/21/2014 725h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
TW4-65 05212014 5/21/2014 725h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
TW4-70~05222014 5/22/2014 713h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
TW4-70 05222014 5/22/2014 713h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
TW4-70 05222014 5/22/2014 713h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Trip Blank 5119/2014 Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Report Date: 6/5/2014 Page 5 of82
All an~ lyses applh:r.l11t:rnd~ ('WA.Sfl~ A.:~•ld RCM r:pttf(WIT!Nba ~'.11'k< l A ·'(ltv.U"'C'i\l ·rl.!lUI\tnl~ul,1l.lnt,l'inf\lfii\Jikwll\ ltk~mtd oo the attached C (:tl-n.l"~~.;:aJ ti1HIIIQIJ5lnfonnntion: This report is prO\•iftk,i for llto:t"~:,, • .:\~1\ YKOfthc
addre!iSee. Privil~' (ff ,,"tt,n(IICJ -.wd·lh.; ll!ltu.! ur& c-n'''lf"U~ UTJim rHr.nba or h• llol.ctiY. !}I "'ru;rduction •tfl1h). fC1W.Jn 'II C~U'lott1~UII Ii(!fil tbc-Ad\crtiS(."tncnt. prOttP111ie!!fOf ltd(&)' ~CI or process, or in connection wilhoil~ tt•}w.ll1lbl\IJ.U t.l't.his rl!port
for any purpose utiJct \)12ft ror 1l'14~Dd.tra.cc: "'t\J In: ttml)~,, ll'l\you Cut~.:a..."'l. llM t'lf1Jll6f7 ~""' ,...,~ luliiJ ~ fht at~ U~M.· rwn"Wd.'t-Of'lnspcction andfo[ llftaly.Wi ih ji.IJ(MI ftuth aud according lO the nileS or the trad'.J aJ,Id n( 1o4;1111X't
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax:[phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Inorganic Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
2nd Quarter Chloroform 2014
1405494
5/23/2014
5/19, 5/21-5/22/2014
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation for the
samples were performed within the method holding times. The samples were properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method cr.iterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD :
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, with the
following exceptions:
Sample ID Analyte QC Explanation
1405494-013B Nitrate-Nitrite (as N) MS Sample matrix interference
1405494-017 A Chloride MSD Sample matrix interference
1405494-026A Chloride MSD/RPD Sample non-homogeneity
or matrix interference
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 6/5/2014 Page 6 of 82
Atl.llfJ3.b'\t(tliW~IIt.rhh:fo l}k.'l.-WA.~IJW.A.• f T<CRA. urc-ftC1((tfmtr! 1n lltc:otdou~ n• N~ ll(ffllle<rlt.. J'cnmc"' wmpiRJJ infonnation is toea ted on the <JUached COC. Confidcmial Ousincsslnformation: Tbis report is provided for the exclusive uscoftbc
lllkh'Cfi,la' ,.,,Vl,~IJCtflfw.l·~n~ ~ r.ttb:rmi'1'K n:"ltl \~~ tw.14.1 trrm~ fttl\-\ ii.lllf'f, ot J<pnWlm.&in •> ~ rv;uft't. ht connection with the ndvcrtiscmcnt, pwmolion or sale of any producl or process, or in connection with the re-publication oflhis rcpo11
fhr .au~ !1'11~ IJU"'1 4)\Q tbllhc ~-ewllllk' lrtllill~·dool) "" ~·uitU:C 'n•hcsm~ 1~Cq.)• dl1 ~~~~hi) OX0:4jl"l (orlbe du" pcrfonnancc of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according 10 the mlcs ofLhetradc aud of science
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1405494
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
Project: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 2014 QC Type: LCS
Analyte Result Units Method
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R69475 DateAnalyzed: 05/27/20141547h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 5.18 mg!L E300.0
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R69740 Date Analyzed: 06/03/2014 1136h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 5.18 mg!L E300.0
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R69801 Date Analyzed: 06/04/2014 1339h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.89 mg!L E300.0
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R69407 Date Analyzed: 05/27/2014 2033h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.968 mg!L E353.2
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R69408 Date Analyzed: 05/27/2014 2125h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.910 mg!L E353.2
MDL
0.00623
0.00623
0.00623
0.00368
0.00368
Reporting
Limit
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.100
Amount
Spiked
5.000
5.000
5.000
1.000
1.000
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
0 104
0 104
0 97.7
0 96.8
0 91.0
Limits
90-110
90-110
90-110
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 6/5/2014 Page 73 of82
All analyses appllc.tblo tO. Uto. C\V A_ SDWA. and RCRA are perfonned in accordance toN ELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC Confidential Business Infom1ation: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subseqm::nt use of the
name of this compAn)" or Jl\)' NU:n~t of its staff, or reproduction or this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion 01 sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This
company accepts no n:sporWhlllr)' c:.wepr for the due performance or inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1405494
Project: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 2014
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: MB-R69475 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride <0.100
Lab Sample JD: MB-R69740 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride < 0.100
Lab Sample JD: MB-R69801 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride < 0.100
Lab Sample ID: MB-R69407 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) < 0.100
Lab Sample ID: MB-R69408 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) <0.100
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: (80 I) 263-8686, Toll Free: [phone], Fax: (80 I) 263-8687
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
QC Type: MBLK
Reporting Amount Spike Ref.
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC
05/27/2014 1532h
mg!L EJOO.O 0.00623 0.100
06/03/2014 112lh
mg!L EJOO.O 0.00623 0.100
06/04/2014 1324h
mg!L EJOO.O 0.00623 0.100
05/27/2014 2031 h
mg/L E353.2 0.00368 0.100
05/27/2014 21 J9h
mg/L E353.2 0.00368 0.100
Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 6/5/2014 Page 74 of82
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinenl sampling iuformation is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the;: addressee1 Privileges of subsequent use of the
name of this company or any member of its staff. or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion 01 sale of any product ot process, or in connection with the re-puhlication oF this repmt for any pufllose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact, This
company nccepts no responsibility except for lhe due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone] Laboratory Director
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ANALYTICAL LABO RATORIES QC SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Lab Set ID: 1405494 Dept: we
Project: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 2014 QC Type: MS
Reporting Amount Spike Ref. RPDRef. RPD
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC Limits Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Lab Sample ID: 1405494-00lAMS Date Analyzed: 05/27/2014 1955h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 5.07 mg/L E300.0 0.00623 0.100 5.000 0.0434 101 90-110 -Lab Sample ID: 1405494-017AMS Date Analyzed: 06/03/2014 1208h
Test Code: 300.0·W
Chloride 617 mg/L E300.0 0.623 10.0 500.0 80.7 107 90-110
Lab Sample 10: 1405494-026AMS Date Analyzed: 06/03/2014 1532h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 501 mg/L E300.0 0.623 10.0 500.0 47.5 90.6 90-110
Lab Sample ID: 1405494-007BMS Date Analyzed: 05/27/2014 2049h
Test Code: N02/N03-W·353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 15.6 mg/L E353.2 0.0368 1.00 10.00 4.87 107 90-110
Lab Sample ID: 1405494-013BMS Date Analyzed: 05/27/2014 2117h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 15.0 mg/L E353.2 0.0368 1.00 10.00 3.44 116 90-llO
Lab Sample ID: 1405494-024BMS Date Analyzed: 05/27/2014 2136h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 12.8 mg/L E353.2 0.0368 1.00 10.00 3.52 93.0 90-110
Lab Sample ID: 1405494-029BMS Date Analyzed: 05/27/2014 2154h ......
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 152 mg/L E353.2 0.368 10.0 100.0 47.2 104 90-110
'-Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
Report Date: 6/5/2014 Page 75 of82
All analyst:s applicable ro the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC prowcols. Pertinent sampling information is Jocared on the attached COC~ Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privil~ges of subsequt!nt use of the
name of this company or ::my member of its stan: or reproduction of this report in conn~tion with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product 01 process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on conU1ct. This
company accepts no respon$ibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone] Laboratory Director
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
American West QC SUMMARY REPORT ANAlYTICAl LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Lab Set ID: 1405494 Dept: we
Project: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 2014 QC Type: MSD
Reporting Amount Spike Ref. RPDRef. RPD
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC Limits Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Lab Sample ID: 1405494-001AMSD Date Analyzed: 05/27/2014 20 I Oh
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.95 mg/L E300.0 0.00623 0.100 5.000 0.0434 98.1 90-110 5.07 2.55 20 -Lab Sample ID: 1405494-017 AMSD Date Analyzed: 06/03/2014 1224h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 637 mg/L E300.0 0.623 10.0 500.0 80.7 Ill 90-110 617 3.27 20
Lab Sample ID: 1405494-026AMSD Date Analyzed: 06/03/2014 1548h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 624 mg/L E300.0 0.623 10.0 500.0 47.5 115 90-110 501 22.0 20 '@
Lab Sample ID: 1405494-007BMSD Date Analyzed: 05/27/20 14 2051 h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 14.8 mg/L E353.2 0.0368 1.00 10.00 4.87 99.0 90-110 15.6 5.20 10
Lab Sample ID: 1405494-013BMSD Date Analyzed: 05/27/2014 2118h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 14.2 mg/L E353.2 0.0368 1.00 10.00 3.44 107 90-110 15 5.79 10
Lab Sample ID: 1405494-024BMSD Date Analyzed: 05/27/2014 2137h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 12.9 mg/L E353.2 0.0368 1.00 10.00 3.52 93.8 90-110 12.8 0.606 10
Lab Sample ID: 1405494-029BMSD Date Analyzed: 05/27/2014 2155h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 157 mg/L E353.2 0.368 10.0 100.0 47.2 110 90-110 152 3.59 10
@ -High RPD due to suspected sample non-homogeneity or matrix interference.
1 -Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix inteiference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
Report Date: 6/5/2014 Page 76 of82
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use of the j
name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report ir1 connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report fo1• any purpose other than for the l:lddressee will be gnmted only on contact. This
company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfonnance of inspection and'or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
American West Analytical Laboratories UL
Denison
WORK ORDER Summary WorkOrder: 1405494
Due Date: 6/4/2014
Page 1 of6
Client:
Client ID:
Project:
Comments:
SampleiD
1405494-00 1A
1405494-00IB
1405494-001C
1405494-002A
1405494-0028
1405494-002C
1405494-00JA
1405494-0038
1405494-003C
1405494-004A
1405494-0048
1405494-004C
1405494-005A
1405494-0058
1405494-005C
1405494-006A
Printed: 5/23/2014
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
DENIOO Contact: Garrin Palmer
2nd Quarter Chloroform 2014 QC Level: ill WO Type: Project
PARush. QC 3 (Summary/No chromatograms). RL of1 ppm for Chloride and VOC and 0.1 ppm forN02/N03. Expected levels provided by client-see G
Jenn. J-flag what we can't meet. ElM Locus and EDD-Denison. Email Group.; ~
Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
TW4-03R_05192014 5/19/2014 1500h 5/23/2014 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Allal}'les: CL
N02/N03-W-353.2 df-no2/no3
1 SELAnalytes: N03N02N
8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4/# ofSurr: 4
TW4-03 __ 05212014 5/21/2014 0706h 5/23/2014 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Analyt&: CL
N02/N03-W-353.2 0 df-no21no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
8260-W VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 41# ofSurr: 4 ---TW4-12 __ 05212014 5/2112014 0725h 5/23/2014 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous df-wc
1 SELAnalytes: CL
N02/N03-W-353.2 df-no2/no3
1 SELAnaly/es: N03N02N
8260-W VOCFridge -
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4/# ofSurr: 4
TW4-28_05212014 5/21/2014 0733h 5/23/2014 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Analyfes: CL
N02/N03-W-353.2 2i df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Ana/ytes: 4/ #of Surr: 4 ---
TW4-32_05212014 5/21/2014 0738h 5/23/2014 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
N02/N03-W-353.2 df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytu: N03N02N
8260-W VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 41# ofSurr: 4
TW4-13_05212014 5/21/2014 0745h 5/23/2014 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M l2f RT 0 CN IZ( TAT [3' QC HOK __ _ HOK __ _ HOK __ ~
WORK ORDER Summary WorkOrder: 1405494 Page2 of6
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 6/4/2014
SampleiD Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Set Storage
1405494-006B 1lVV4-13~05212014 5/21/2014 0745h 5123/2014 1015h N02/N03-W-353.2 Aqueous ~ elf-no2/no3
1 SELAnalytes: N03N02N
1405494-006C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom~· #of Ana/yles: 4 /# ojSurr: 4
1405494-007A TW4-14_05212014 5/21/2014 0752h 5123/2014 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SEL Ana!yte.s: CL
1405494-007B N02/N03-W-353_2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1405494-007C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom: #of Analytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
1405494-00SA TW4-27_05212014 5/21/2014 0800h 5123/2014 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SEL A11afytes: CL
1405494-00SB N02/N03-W-353.2 l~l df-no2/no3
I SELA11alytes: N03N02N
1405494-00SC 8260-W !;'~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Ana(vtes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
1405494-009A 1lVV4-30_05212014 5/2112014 0808h 5/23/2014 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SEL Anal tes: CL
1405494-009B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ elf-no2/no3
I SELAnalytes: N03N02N
1405494-009C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge l
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
1405494-010A 1lVV4-31_05212014 5/21/2014 0815h 5/23/2014 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SEL Ana ~&: CL
1405494-010B N02/N03-W-353.2 WI df-no2/no3
I SEL Arwfyte.s: N03N02N
1405494-010C 8260-W 21 VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom: #of Analytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
1405494-011 A 1lVV4-34_ 05212014 5/21/2014 0823h 5/23/2014 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SEL Analytes: CL
1405494-011B N02/N03-W-353.2 Qi elf-no2/no3
1 SELAnalytes: N03N02N
1405494-0IIC 8260-W ~ VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
1405494-0 12A TW4-23 _ 05212014 5/2112014 083lh 5/2312014 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ elf-we
1 SELAnalytes: CL
1405494-012B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SELAnalytes: N03N02N
Printed: 5/23/2014 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M D RT 0 CN 0 TAT 0 QC D HOK ___ HOK ___ HOK __ COC Emailed
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1405494 Page 3 of6
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 6/4/2014
SampleiD Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1405494-012C TW4-23_05212014 5/21/2014 0831h 5/23/2014 1015h 8260-W Aqueous ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
1405494-0BA TW4-09_05212014 5/21/2014 0841h 5/23/2014 l015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SEL Ana/ytes: CL
1405494-0138 N02/N03-W-353.2 1.11 df-no2/no3
I SEL Analyills: N03N02N
1405494-0 l3C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge :3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
1405494-014A TW4-25_05192014 5/19/2014 1215h 5/23/2014 l015h 300.0-W Aqueous \V'l df-wc
1 SELAnalytes: CL
1405494-0148 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SELAnaf•tes: N03N02N
1405494-014C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
1405494-015A TW4-26_05212014 5/21/2014 0900h 5/23/2014 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SELAnalytes: CL
1405494-0158 N02/N03-W-353.2 0 df-no2/no3
I SEL Aritl/ytes: N03N02N
1405494-015C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 l#ofSurr: 4
1405494-016A TW4-06_05222014 5/22/2014 0655h 5/23/2014 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous VI df-wc
I SEL A11alytes; CL
1405494-0168 N02/N03-W-353.2 Vl df-no2/no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1405494-016C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Ana/ytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
1405494-017A TVV4-16_05222014 5/22/2014 0713h 5/23/2014101511 300.0-VV Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SEL Analytes: CL
1405494-0178 N02/N03-VV-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL Ana lyres: N03N02N
1405494-0l?C 8260-VV ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 /#ofSurr: 4
1405494-018A TVV4-05 _05222014 5/22/2014 0720h 5/23/2014 1015h 300.0-VV Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SEL Analy~s: CL
1405494-0188 N02/N03-VV-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL Analyre.r: N03N02N
1405494-018C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Ana/ytes: 4 /#0{Surr: 4
Printed: 5/2312014 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M 0 RT 0 CND TAT 0 oco HOK __ HOK __ HOK __ COCEmailed
WORK ORDER Summary WorkOrder: 1405494 Page 4 of6
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 6/4/2014
SampleiD Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1405494-019A TVV4-18_05222014 5/22/2014 0727h 5/23/2014 1015h 300.0-VV Aq11eous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1405494-0 19B N02/N03-VV-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL I$Jia(vres: N03N02N
1405494-019C 8260-VV ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Ana/ytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1405494-020A TVV4-08_05222014 5/22/2014 0750h 5/23/2014 1015h 300.0-VV Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SELAnalytes: CL
1405494-020B N02/N03-VV-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL AmJlyJes: N03N02N
1405494-020C 8260-VV ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Ana/ytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1405494-021A TVV4-24_05192014 5/19/2014 1230h 5/23/2014 1015h 300.0-VV Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SEL Analytes: CL
1405494-021B N02/N03-VV-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SELAnalytes: N03N02N
1405494-021C 8260-VV ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1405494-022A TVV4-33_05222014 5/22/2014 0756h 5/23/2014 1015h 300.0-VV Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1405494-022B N02/N03-VV-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1405494-022C 8260-VV Wl VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Ana/ytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1405494-023A TVV4-21_05222014 5/22/2014 0807h 5/23/2014 1015h 300.0-VV Aqueous [J] df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1405494-023B N02/N03-VV-353.2 IJ1 df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1405494-023C 8260-VV ~ VOCFridge J
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Ana/ytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1405494-024A TVV4-29_05222014 5/22/2014 0820h 5/23/2014 1015h 300.0-VV Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SEL Ana/ytes: CL
1405494-024B N02/N03-VV-353.2 ~ df-no21no3
1 SELAna/ytes: N03N02N
1405494-024C 8260-VV ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Ana/ytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1405494-025A TVV4-19_05192014 5/19/2014 I 03 5h 5/23/2014 1015h 300.0-VV Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL llJla~vtes: CL
Printed: 5/23/2014 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M D RT 0 CN D TAT 0 QCD HOK __ HOK __ HOK __ COCEmailed
WORK ORDER Summary WorkOrder: 1405494 Page 5 of6
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 6/4/2014
SampleiD Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1405494-025B TW4-19_05192014 5/19/2014 1035h 5/23/2014 1015h N02/N03-W-353.2 Aqueous ~ df-no2/no3
1 SELAnalytes: N03N02N
1405494-025C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom: #of Analytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
1405494-026A TW4-04_05192014 5/19/2014 1410h 5/23/2014 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL A110/yl~: CL
1405494-026B N02/N03-W-353.2 "" df-no2/no3
1 SEL AnalyttiS: N03N02N
1405494-026C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
1405494-027A MW-04_ 05192014 5/19/2014 1400h 5/23/2014 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SELAna/ytes: CL
1405494-027B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analyles: N03N02N
1405494-027C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge J
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Ana/ytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
1405494-028A MW-26_05192014 5/19/2014 1350h 5/23/2014 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous IJl df-wc
1 SEL Analyuu: CL
1405494-028B N02/N03-W-353.2 1\il df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1405494-028C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
1405494-029A TW4-22_05192014 5/19/2014 1245h 5/23/2014 10 15h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1405494-029B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL.Ana}jltes: N03N02N
1405494-029C 8260-W 0 VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1405494-030A TW4-20_05192014 5/19/2014 1255h 5/23/2014 l015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SEL Am.zl)!tts: CL
1405494-030B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SELAnalytes: N03N02N
1405494-030C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
1405494-031A TW4-65_05212014 5/2112014 0725h 5/23/2014 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1405494-031B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SELAnalytes: N03N02N
Printed: 5/23/2014 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M 0 RT 0 CN 0 TAT 0 QCO HOK ___ HOK ___ HOK __ COC Emailed
WORK ORDER Summary WorkOrder: 1405494 Page6 of6
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 6/4/2014
SampleiD Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1405494-031C TW4-65_05212014 5/21/2014 0725h 5123/2014 1015h 8260-W Aqueous ~ VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1405494-032A TW4-70_05222014 5/22/2014 0713h 5/23/2014 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Alralyte.s: CL
1405494-032B N02/N03-W-353.2 VI df-no2/no3
1 SELAnalyte.s: N03N02N
1405494-032C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 l#ofSurr: 4
1405494-033A Trip Blank 5/19/2014 5/23/2014 1015h 8260-W Aqueous ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# of Surr: 4
Printed: 5/23/2014 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M 0 RT 0 CN 0 TAT 0 QC 0 HOK __ HOK __ _ HOK___ COC Emailed, ____ _
CLIENT:
ADDRESS:
CONTACT:
PHONE II:
EMAIL:
PRoJECT NAME:
PROJECT #J:
POll:
SAMPLER NAME:
AMERICAN WEST
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 W. 3600 S. SALT LAKE CITY. UT 84115
PHONE # [phone] TOLL FREE # [phone]
FAX # [phone] EMAJL AWAL<iPAWAL-LABS.COM
WWW.AWAL-LABS.COM
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy. 191
Blanding, UT 84511
GarriD Palmer
[phone] CELL 11:
~e~~~~~cmn;KW~e~~~~d&~~~~;---------------­
cl~at:P!uok.eam
2n4 Quarter Chloroform 2014
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
ALL ANALYSIS WILL BE' CONDUCTED USlNCI NELAP A.CCR!:()flU) M!.THODS AND AU. DATA WfLL BE RIPQRTI!D USlNV AWAL's
STANDARD ANALY'l'!! LISTS AND RUORTIN<! UMITS (PQL) UNLESS SPI!CifiiCAU.Y REQUEST'I!D OTfoiMWIIII! ON THl6 CHAIN Of'
CUSTODY AND/Ort ATTACHI!D DOCUMENTATION. r -QC ~EVE~ -
1
0' ci Q
(')
!;
Q ~ ~
TuRN AROUND TIME:
STANDARD
lJNLI!SS OniiR ARRANCIEMI!'!NTS HAVE
COMPUANCB WITH:
0 NELAP
0 RCRA
0 CWA
0 SDWA
0 ELAP/ A2LA
0 NLLAP
D NoN-COMPUANCE
D OTHI!R:
KNOWN HAZARDS
&
It{ u ; c..r 't cf
AWAL LAB SAMPLE SET#
1 OF 3
CUE NT:
ADDRESS:
CONTACT:
PHONE 1#:
EMAIL:
PROJECT NAME:
PRo.n!CT #:
POl#:
SAMPLER NAME:
AMERICAN WEST
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 W. 3600 S. SALT LAKE CITY, I.1T 84115
PHoNE # [phone] TOLL FREE I# [phone]
EMAIL. [e-mail] FAX I# [phone]
WWW.AWAl.-LABS.COM
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy. 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Garrin Palmer
[phone] CELL#:
gpatiDeJ@8iieriYfliei•.com; KWeiild@energyfu·::er.IS:-:.c::o=m~;,---------­
[e-mail]
2nd Quarter Chloroform 2014
DATE
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
ALL ANALYSIS WILL. Be CONDUCTED U5INO NEl.AP ACC::REDITI!D MI!THODS AND ALL DATA WILL BE RI!PORTI!D USINCI AWAL.'s
STANDARD ANALYTe USTS AND RI!!!PORTING LIMITS (PQL) UNLE:SS S,RCIPICALLY RI!QUI!ISTI!D OTH:I!RWISE ON THIS CHAIN OP
CUSTODY AND/OR ATTACHI!D DOCUt.CI!NTATION.
BI!EN MAOE. SIGNeD RI!PORTS WIU. ••
/ "to s t1 9'-/_
AWAL LAB SAMPLE SET11!
PAaE 2 oF 3
I QC LBVBL:~~TuRN AROUND TIMI!I: II U"'-"<• OTHIR ARRANoaM•NTa HAv•
3 STANDARD ltNAI&ZD liY 5:00PM ON THI! DAY"n<<!V ~~~·(·:•'::!;~
. ARI! DUI!. ~~~~ ...::~ 0::..,-L.-~~-. ·...za.lo'"(u.• .-. -....;:,;;p
INCLUDE EDD:
LOCUS UPLOAD
EXCEL
FIELD FILTERED FoR:
COMPLIANCE WITH:
NELAP
D RCRA
D CWA
D SDWA
D El.AP I A2LA
D NLLAP
D NoN-COMPUANCE
D OTHER:
KNOWN HAZARDS
&
~I
CLIENT:
ADDRESS:
CONTACT:
PHONE H:
EMAIL:
PR.O.JECT NAME:
PROJECT 1#:
POl#:
SAMPLER NAME:
AMERICAN WEST
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 W . 3600 S. SALT LAKE Crrv. UT 84115
PHONE # [phone] TOLL FREE I# (888} 263-8686
FAX It [phone] EMAIL [e-mail]
WWW.AWAJ...-LABS.COM
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy. 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Garr.l.n Palmer
[phone] CELL H:
~,=,=-=&=:-:e::i@eil==er:::iiYfU==etS"'"'.com==-,'""· KW""""'em=""'el@en"" err;ytU·~eT!B-.-co-m=;--------­
dtarll(i)eJlergyfuel.s.com
2nd Quarter Chloroform 2014
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Au. ANALYS1S Wlt.L !U! C:ONDUCTI!D USINct NEI.AP ACCRI!:DiftD lofi!THODS AND AU.. DATA WILL BE RR:PORTe'P US&NII AWAL's
ln'ANDARD ANALYT'I!. USTS AND RE!POR'T1NC!I UMITS (PQL) UNLIZSS SNCIF1CAU.Y REQU&STED OTHERWln: oN THIS CHAIN OP
CUSTODY AND/OR ATTACHirD DOC\IM!!NTA'T10N.
L~~VB~ -1 TURN AROUND TIMB:
STANDARD
X INCWDE EDD:
LOCUS UPLOAD
EXCEL
FJeLD FILTERED FoR:
Fo11 CoMPLlANC!! WITH:
0 NELAP
RCRA
CWA
SDWA
ELAP/ A2LA
NLLAP
NoN-COMPLIANCE
OTHER:
KNOWN HAZARDS
&
COMMENTS
/Cfu)tf'fo/
AWAL G ill SN.c~ sir II
PAIOE l3 0 1' 3
Preservation Check Sheet
1405494
NOz/N03: pH <2 H2S04 ~--~-----L----._--~~--~----~----~--~----~----~----~--~----~----~--~----~
NOz/N03: pH <2 H2S04 ~--~----~----._--~~--~----~----~--~----~----~----L---~----~----~--~----~
American West ANALVTICAL lARORATOAifS
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: (80 l) 263-8687
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Garrin Palmer
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
TEL: ( 435) 678-2221
RE: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 2014
Dear Garrin Palmer: Lab Set ID: 1405562
American West Analytical Laboratories received 9 sample(s) on 5/28/2014 for the
analyses presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AWAL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) in Utah and Texas; and is
state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, and Missouri.
All analyses were performed in accordance to the NELAP protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation scope documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
Thank You,
Approved by:
Ky I e F . Digitally signed by Kyle F. Gross
ON: en=Kyle F. Gross, o=AWAL,
ou=AWAL-Laboratory Director,
G roSS
email=kyle@awal-labs com, c=US
Data: 2014 06 05 13:54:04 -06'00'
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 6/5/2014 Page 1 of31
All ann lyses l'lpplicablc to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pcnincnt sampling inronn:uion is loc~Lcd on the au.achcd COC Conlldcnti01l Business [nformatirm: This report is providl!d for the c~clusivc usc of the
addressee Privileges of subscqlJCntuse of the name of this comp:1ny or ony member of its sLnfT, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advcrtiscmcm. promotion or sale of :my product or process, orin connl.'ction with the -rc~publi.:ation oflhis report
for any puTJ:)OSC othc1 thao for lhc :Jddressec will be gran led only on conLacL. This eompony nccepts no responsibility except for the due pcrfonnance of in~pcetion and/or onalysis in good faith and according lo the n1lcs of the trade aud of science
SAMPLE SUMMARY
American West Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
ANALYTICAL lABORATOAI£6 Project: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 2014
Lab Set ID: 1405562
Date Received: 5/28/2014 940h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
463 West 3600 South
1405562-001A ~W-32_05232014 5/23/2014 1250h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Salt Lake City, UT 84115 1405562-001B ~W-32_05232014 5/23/2014 1250h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1405562-001 c ~W-32_05232014 5/23/2014 1250h Aqueous VOA by GCMS ~ethod
8260C/5030C
Phone: [phone] 1405562-002A TW4-11 05232014 5/23/2014 702h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1405562-002B TW4-11_05232014 5/23/2014 702h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2 Toll Free: [phone] 1405562-002C TW4-11 05232014 5/23/2014 702h Aqueous VOA by GCMS ~ethod
Fax: [phone]C/5030C
e-mail: [e-mail] 1405562-003A TW4-07_05232014 5/23/2014 712h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1405562-003B TW4-07_05232014 5/23/2014 712h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
web: www.awal-labs.com 1405562-003C TW4-07 __ 05232014 5/23/2014 712h Aqueous VOA by GCMS ~ethod
8260C/5030C
1405562-004A TW4-01_05232014 5/23/2014 728h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Kyle F. Gross 1405562-004B TW4-01_05232014 5/23/2014 728h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1405562-004C TW4-01_05232014 5/23/2014 728h Aqueous VOA by GCMS ~ethod
Laboratory Director 8260C/5030C
1405562-005A TW4-10_05232014 5/23/2014 740h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Jose Rocha 1405562-005B TW4-10_05232014 5/23/2014 740h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
QA Officer 1405562-005C TW4-10_05232014 5/23/2014 740h Aqueous VOA by GCMS ~ethod
8260C/5030C
1405562-006A TW4-02_05232014 5/23/2014 755h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1405562-006B TW4-02_05232014 5/23/2014 755h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1405562-006C TW4-02~05232014 5/23/2014 755h Aqueous VOA by GCMS ~ethod
8260C/5030C
1405562-007 A TW4-60_05272014 5/27/2014 1015h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1405562-007B TW4-60_05272014 5/27/2014 1015h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1405562-007C TW4-60_05272014 5/27/2014 1015h Aqueous VOA by GCMS ~ethod
8260C/5030C
1405562-008A TW4-11~05222014 5/22/2014 1022h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1405562-008B TW4-11R_05222014 5/22/2014 1022h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1405562-008C TW4-11R_05222014 5/22/2014 1022h Aqueous VOA by GCMS Method
8260C/5030C
1405562-009A Trip Blank 5/22/2014 Aqueous VOA by GCMS ~ethod
8260C/5030C
Report Date: 6/5/2014 Page 2 of31
All an;~ lyses appli~l1lc>IC1U .. (;\VA.. SUWA JIOlJ ncRA 1111~'""'""" \n..ccordancc"'~r.LAt..~tv-WbC()lt. r~nln~r;U ~mh~tlD1i:lf10JII(Ifl tt loa:;:d llfY the altac}laj( (K,'" C..\\f!~"tial Business lnfonnalion: Thls report is {Mt.W~ fi)f 11~ exclusive usc oflhc
addressee. Privilcpt~ r.r~l'lh)(~Jt:rc·l'o!o uwurU\rttlllfk." ~d'dtit '"J'Ifl~ln) nr•lt member o(biUOi'r, '"'J ~fY'O~!tK::h(l.{ll•ftbK fcpol11n ~""'" "VU,)l I he' .J~crtiscment. rnn1W¥tirn1 Clf:s&lc of any product or process, or in conl'k!ctitln "'"'h 1ht n:'~lication of U1is n:p011
f(lr 311)' purpose oilN!'r\,hnn ft'tt tht .dd~!iCC wi)J bf: ft(llnt:c'd'Vfl\)' un tumOtt. This COin(IQn') Dftq"'h'!~ =-.-..<lobnd!ijlh ClM:tJl'i:-fiw II~ l)th.~ paJilnlliiMC ~J Ulspcclion UJI]fOf_IIIAt; lUi 1P ~ood failh and according to the n1lcs of lf1to II IJ nnd f\(u:icocc.
ANALYTICAL lABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Inorganic Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
2nd Quarter Chloroform 2014
1405562
5/28/2014
5/22-5/23 & 5/27/2014
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation for the
samples were performed within the method holding times. The samples were properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD:
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, with the
following exceptions:
Sample ID Analyte QC Explanation
1405562-00lB Nitrate-Nitrite (as N) MS/MSD Sample matrix interference
1405563-001D Nitrate-Nitrite (as N) MS/MSD Sample matrix interference
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 6/5/2014 Page 3 of31
All anr~lyses applicable Lo the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA nrc pel fonncd in accordance Lo NELACprotocols. Pcnincol sampling infonnaLion is locatcd oo lhc au.achcd COC Confidential Business lnfonnalion: This report is provided for lhe exclusive use oflbc
addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any membeJ of iLs slarf, or reproduction oflhis report in connection wilh Lhc advcrtisemcnl, promolion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with Lhe re-publication oftl1is repmt
for any purpose olbcr Lhao for the addressee will be graoled only on conl.acL This company accepts no responsibility cxccpl for the due pcrfonnancc of inspccLioTI and/or-analysis in good railh and according lo the mlcs oflhc trade and of science
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1405562
Project: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 2014
Analyte Result Units
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: (801 ) 263-8686, Toll Free: (8 88) 263-8686, Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
Method MDL
Reporting
Limit
QC Type: LCS
Amount
Spiked
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R69833 Date Analyzed: 06/04/2014 1339h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.89 mg/L E300,0 0.00623 0.100 5.000 0 97.7
Lab Sample ID: LC8-R69751 Date Analyzed: 06/03/2014 2227h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.952 rng/L E353.2 0.00368 0.100 1.000 0 95.2
Limits
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 6/5/2014 Page 22 of 31
A11 analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordat1Ce to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. Conftdential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the
nume of this com puny or any member of its stAff. or reproduction of this report in connection with the adve1tisement, promotion 01 sale or any product 01 process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the: addressee will be granted only on contact9 This
company m:ct:-pts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection mllVor analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1405562
Project: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 2014
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: MB-R69833 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride <0.100
Lab Sample ID: MB-R69751 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) < 0.100
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
QC Type: MBLK
Reporting Amount Spike Ref.
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC
06/04/2014 1324h
mg/L E300.0 0.00623 0.100 -06/03/20 !4 2226h
mg/L E353.2 0.00368 0.100
Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 6/5/2014 Page 23 of31
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA. ond RCRA are perfomled in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attctched COC. Confidential Business lnfom1ation: This 1~port is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the
name of this company or any member of its stafT, or rcproduclion of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this repon for any purpose other than for the atJf.Jressee will be granted only on contact This
company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfonnnnce of inspection and/or am1lysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science ..
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1405562
Project: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 2014
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: 1405563-001BMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 25,200
Lab Sample ID: 1405562-007 AMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.90
Lab Sample ID: 1405562-001BMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.794
Lab Sample ID: 1405563-00lDMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.817
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
C SUMMARY REPORT
Reporting
Units Method MDL Limit
06/04/2014 1910h
mg/L E300.0 31.2 500
06/04/2014 2306h
mg/L E300.0 0.00623 0.100
06/03/2014 224 7h
mg/L E353.2 0.00368 0.100
06/03/2014 2253h
•Jllg/l. E353.2 0.00368 0.100
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
QCType: MS
Amount Spike Ref.
Spiked Amount %REC
25,000 39.9 100
5.000 0.0161 97.7
1.000 0 79.4
1.000 0 81.7
1 -Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix inteiference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
Limits
90-110
90-110
90-110
90-110
K y1e F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 6/5/2014 Page 24 of31
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC-Confidential Business Tnformation: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addJ essee. Privileges of subsequent use of the
name of this company or any member of its staff. or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose othe1 than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This
company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good Faith and according to the rules of the t1 ade and of science
LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1405562
Project: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 2014
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: 1405563-001BMSD Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 25,000
Lab Sample ID: 1405562-007 AMSD Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 5.46
Lab Sample ID: 1405562-001BMSD Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.842
Lab Sample ID: 1405563-00lDMSD Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.839
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: (80 I) 263-8686, Toll Free: [phone], Fax: (80 I) 263-8687
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked
06/04/2014 J926h
mg/L E300.0 31.2 500 25,000
06/04/2014 2322h
mg/L E300.0 0.00623 0.100 5.000
06/03/2014 2248h
mg/L E353.2 0.00368 0.100 1.000
06/03/2014 2254h
mg/L E353.2 0.00368 0.100 1.000
Garrin Palmer
we
MSD
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
39.9 99.8
0.0161 109
0 84.2
0 83.9
1 -Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
Limits
90-110
90-110
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit
25200 0.691 20
4.9 10.9 20
0.794 5.81 10
0.817 2.63 10
Qual
Report Date: 6/5/2014 Page 25 of3l
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA tue perFonned in ilCCordnnce to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infom1ation is located on the attached COC.. Confidential Business lnfommtion: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressr!e. Privilege..'i of subsequent use of the
nume of this com puny or a11y m!!mber of its staft: or l't:productiun or this report in connection with the adve11isement, promotion 01 sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact~ This
company nccepts no responsibility except for the due perFormance or inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
American West Analytical Laboratories UL
Denison
WORK ORDER Summary WorkOrder: 1405562 Page 1 of2
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 6/6/2014
ClientiD: DENlOO Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 2014 QCLevel: III WO Type: Project
Comments: PA Rush. QC 3 (Summary/No chromatograms). RL of 1 ppm for Chloride and VOC and 0.1 ppm for N02/N03. Expected levels provided by client-see
Jenn. J-flag what we can't meet. EJJ\.1 Locus and EDD-Denison. Email Group.;
SampleiD Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1405562-00IA MW-32_05232014 5/23/2014 1250h 5/2812014 0940h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SELAnalytes: CL
1405562-00IB N02/N03-W-353.2 IJl df-no2/no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1405562-001C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
1405562-002A TW4-11_05232014 5/23/2014 0702h 5/28/2014 0940h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SEL Anal)!tes: CL
1405562-002B N02/N03-W-353.2 lJl df-no2/no3
I SELAnalytes: N03N02N
1405562-002C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
1405562-003A TW4-07_05232014 5/23/2014 0712h 5/28/2014 0940h 300.0-W Aqueous lJl df-wc
I SEL Analytes: CL
1405562-003B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SELAnalytes: N03N02N
1405562-003C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
1405562-004A TW4-01_05232014 5/23/2014 0728h 5/28/2014 0940h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SELAnalytes: CL
1405562-004B N02/N03-W -353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL AJra~tu: N03N02N
1405562-004C 8260-W 0 VOCFridge 3
Test Grorp: 8260-W-CltJtom; #of Ana lyres: 4 l#o]Surr: 4
1405562-005A TW4-10_05232014 5/23/2014 0740h 5/28/2014 0940h 300.0-W Aqueous [JJ df-wc
1 SEL An(l/ 4: CL
1405562-005B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1405562-005C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Gro11p: 8260-W-Custom; #of A11a/yles: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1405562-006A TW4-02_05232014 5/23/2014 0755h 5/28/2014 0940h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SELAnalytes: CL
Printed: 5/28/2014 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M g" RT if CN El TAT 6' QCE(' HOK __ HOK __ HOK __ coc Err1a~ed
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1405562 Page2 of2
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 6/6/2014
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1405562-0068 TW4-02_05232014 5/23/2014 0755h 5/28/2014 0940h N02/N03-W-353.2 Aqueous OJ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Anazyte.s: N03N02N
1405562-006C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom: #of Analyte.s: 41 # ofSurr: 4
1405562-007A TW4-60_05272014 5/27/2014 1015h 5/28/2014 0940h 300.0-W Aqueous Wl df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1405562-0078 N02/N03-W-353.2 0 df· no2/no3
1 SEL Ana/ytes-: N03N02N
1405562-007C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #if Ana/yres: 4/# o/Swr: 4
1405 562-008A TW4-11R_05222014 5/22/2014 1022h 5/28/2014 0940h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-we
1 SEL Anal res: CL
1405562-0088 N02/N03-W-353.2 OJ df • no2/no3
1 SELAJwlytes: N03N02N
1405562-00SC 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Gronp: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4/# ofSurr: 4
1405562-009A Trip Blank 5/22/2014 5/28/2014 0940h 8260-W Aqueous ~ VOCFridge 3
Test GrolfJJ: 8260-W-Ctt.$tom; #of Analytes: 4/# ofSurr: 4
Printed: 5/28/2014 FORLABORATORYUSEONLY[filloutonpage1]: %M 0 RT 0 CN 0 TAT 0 QCO HOK __ _ HOK __ HOK___ COC Emailed,__ ___ _
Client:
Address:
Contact:
Phone#:
Email:
Project Name:
Project#:
PO#:
Sampler Name:
American West
Analytical Laboratories
463 W. 3600 S. Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone# [phone] Toll Free# [phone]
Fax# [phone] Email awal@awal~abs.com
www.awal-labs.com
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy. 191
Blanding, UT 84511
--
\"'T-.oJVJ u•u-~~...,.&. Cell#:
[e-mail]; KWemei@eneJ"Dfi
dturlr@Jenerll!!!eJ..com
2nd Quarter Chloroform 2014
Tanner Holliday
CHAIN OF CUSTODY /~0 s-5(flz_
AI! analysis wi!l be conducted using NELAP aCQ'editad methods and all data will be reported using AWAL's standard analyte liets and reporting
limits (POL) unless specifically requested otherwise on this Chain of Custody and/or attached documentation.
AWAL Lab Sample Set#
1 of 1
Turn Around Time: t QC~evel: ~
Standard
Unless other arrangements have been made,
algned reports will be emallad by 5:00pm on
the day they are due.
Include EDD:
LOCUS UPLOAD
EXCEL
Field Filtered For.
Compliance With:
NELAP
RCRA
CWA
SDWA
El.AP/A2l.A
NLLAP
Known Hazards
&
See the Analytical Scope of Work for Reporting Limits and
list.
Preservation Check Sheet
s Je SetE doH
Analysis Preservative ( J.. J l( J (r 7 ?
Ammonia pH<2H2S04
COD pH<2 H2S04
Cyanide pH>12
NaOH
Metals pH<2HN03
N0 2&N0 3 pH <2 H2S04 Vet v~ t£0 y"cy ~f lYe! v~ ~'\
O&G -PH<2HCL I I 1 ' r
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TP04
'
Procedure:
Frequency:
pH <2 H2so,,
pH>9NaOH,
Zn Acetate
pH<2H2S04
pH<2H2S04
-
-
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from Lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
I
-
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
If sample is not preserved, properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag COC, notify client if requested
Place client conversation on COC
Samples may be adjusted
All samples requiring preservation
*
+ ...
#
•
The sample required additional preservative upon receipt.
The sample was received unpreserved
The Sample was received unpreserved and therefore preserved upon receipt.
The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH< 2 due to the sample matrix
The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH> __ due to the sample matrix interference
Lab Set ID: /</Q )5""2..
TabH
Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
H-1 Field Data Evaluation
2x
NC =Not Calculated
TWN-2, TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-25 are continuously pumping wells.
Piezometers 1, 2, and 3 were not pumped, only one set of parameters were taken.
TWN-3 and TWN-7 were pumped dry and sampled after recovery.
~ .. t~~~~~~~
H-2: Holding Time Evaluation
Hold Time Allowed Hold Hold Time
Location ID Parameter Name Sample Date Analysis Date (Days) Time (Davs) Check
PIEZ-01 Chloride 517/2014 5/9/2014 2 28 OK
PIEZ-01 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 517/2014 5/15/2014 8 28 OK
PIEZ-02 Chloride 517/2014 5/9/2014 2 28 OK
PIEZ-02 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 517/2014 5/16/2014 9 28 OK
PIEZ-03 Chloride 517/2014 5/9/2014 2 28 OK
PIEZ-03 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 517/2014 5/15/2014 8 28 OK
TWN-01 Chloride 5/6/2014 5/9/2014 3 28 OK
TWN-01 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 5/6/2014 5/15/2014 9 28 OK
TWN-02 Chloride 517/2014 5/9/2014 2 28 OK
TWN-02 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 517/2014 5/15/2014 8 28 OK
TWN-03 Chloride 517/2014 5/9/2014 2 28 OK
TWN-03 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 517/2014 5/15/2014 8 28 OK
TWN-04 Chloride 5/6/2014 5/9/2014 3 28 OK
TWN-04 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 5/6/2014 5/15/2014 9 28 OK
TWN-07 Chloride 517/2014 5/9/2014 2 28 OK
TWN-07 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 517/2014 5/15/2014 8 28 OK
TWN-07R Chloride 5/6/2014 5/16/2014 10 28 OK
TWN-07R Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 5/6/2014 5/15/2014 9 28 OK
TWN-18 Chloride 5/6/2014 5/9/2014 3 28 OK
TWN-18 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 5/6/2014 5/15/2014 9 28 OK
TW4-22 Chloride 5/19/14 6/3/14 15 28 OK
TW4-22 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 5/19/14 5/27/14 8 28 OK
TW4-24 Chloride 5/19/14 6/3/14 15 28 OK
TW4-24 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 5/19/14 5/27/14 8 28 OK
TW4-25 Chloride 5/19/14 5/28/14 9 28 OK
TW4-25 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 5/19/14 5/27/14 8 28 OK
TW4-60 Chloride 5/27/2014 6/4/2014 8 28 OK
TW4-60 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 5/27/2014 6/3/2014 7 28 OK
TWN-60 Chloride 5/8/2014 5/16/2014 8 28 OK
TWN-60 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 5/8/2014 5/15/2014 7 28 OK
TWN-65 Chloride 5/6/2014 5/9/2014 3 28 OK
TWN-65 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 5/6/2014 5/15/2014 9 28 OK
H-3: Analytical Method Check
P1u·amet«_ NtefhocJ J\'fetllinl U'~ed by Lab
Nitrate E353.1 or E353.2 E353.2
A4500-Cl B or A4500-Cl E
Chloride orE300.0 A4500-Cl-E or E300.0
Both Nitrate and Chloride were analyzed with the correct analytical method.
-eporung mut ec H 4 R L .. Ch k
Required
Lab Reporting Reporting
Location Analyte Limit Units Qualifier Limit Units RLCheck
PIEZ-01 Chloride 5 mg/L 1 mg/L OK
PIEZ-01 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK
PIEZ-02 Chloride 5 mg/L 1 mg/L OK
PIEZ-02 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.01 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK
PIEZ-03 Chloride 5 mg/L 1 mg/L OK
PIEZ-03 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK
TWN-01 Chloride 5 mg/L 1 mg/L OK
TWN-01 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK
TWN-02 Chloride 5 mg/L 1 mg/L OK
TWN-02 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK
TWN-03 Chloride 25 mg/L 1 mg/L OK
TWN-03 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK
TWN-04 Chloride 5 mg/L 1 mg/L OK
TWN-04 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK
TWN-07 Chloride 5 mg/L 1 mg/L OK
TWN-07 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 IDl?;IL 0.1 mg/L OK
TWN-07R Chloride 1 mg/L u 1 mg/L OK
TWN-07R Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L u 0.1 mg/L OK
TWN-18 Chloride 5 mg/L 1 mg/L OK
TWN-18 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.5 mgfL 0.1 mg/L OK
TW4-22 Chloride 100 mg/L 1 mg/L OK
TW4-22 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK
TW4-24 Chloride 100 mg/L 1 mg/L OK
TW4-24 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 5 mg_IL 0.1 mg/L OK
TW4-25 Chloride 50 mg/L 1 mg/L OK
TW4-25 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK
TW4-60 Chloride 1 rng!L u 1 mg/L OK
TW4-60 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L u 0.1 mg!L OK
TWN-60 Chloride 1 mg/L u 1 m0L OK
TWN-60 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L u 0.1 mg/L OK
TWN-65 Chloride 5 mg/L 1 mg/L OK
TWN-65 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK
U =Value was reported by the laboratory as nondetect.
H-5 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
~onsfitlient !PWN·04 Tw.N•65 %RPD
Chloride 29.6 26.6 10.68
Nitrogen 1.55 1.54 0.65
H-6 QC Control Limits for Analysis and Blanks
Method Blank Detections
All Method Blanks for the quarter were non-detect.
Matrix Soike % Recoverv C --·· ·-· -----
REC
Lab Report Lab Sample ID Well Analyte MS %REC MSD%REC Range RPD
1405196 1405337-006BMS N/A Chloride 88.1 107 90-110 17.6
1405196 1405196-002AMS TWN-04 Chloride 114 95.9 90-110 4.6
1405494 1405494-013BMS TW4-09 Nitrate 116 107 90-110 5.79
1405494 1405494-017BMS TW4-16 Chloride 107 111 90-110 3.27
1405494 1405494-026AMS TW4-04 Chloride 90.6 115 90-110 22.0
1405562 1405562-001 BMS MW-32 Nitrate 79.4 84.2 90-110 5.81
1405562 1405563-001 DMS N/A Nitrate 81.7 83.9 90-110 2.63
N/ A: QC was not performed on an EFRI sample.
Laboratory Control Sample
All Laboratory Control Samples were within acceptance limits for the quarter.
H7R . T E I -cce1pL 1 cmperalUre va uatwn
Sample Batch Wells inBaU:h :Iem_peFatul'c
Piezometer 1, Piezometer 2, Piezometer 3, TWN-1, TWN-2,
1405196 TWN-3, TWN-4, TWN-7, TWN-07R, TWN-18, TWN-60, 1.6°C
TWN-65
1405494 TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25 3.8 oc
1405562 TW4-60 3.6 oc
H-8 Rinsate Evaluation
All Rinsate and DI Blank samples were non-detect for the quarter.
Tab I
Kriged Current Quarter Isoconcentration Maps
NS = not sampled; NO = not detected
....._ 1 0 kriged nitrate isocon and label
MW-4 perched monitoring well showing e 4.1 concentration in mg/l
TW4·1 temporary perched monitoring well 0 6.9 showing concentration in mg/l
TWN-1 temporary perched nitrate monitoring ~ 1.6 well showing concentration in mg/l
PIEZ-1
Q 7.6
TW~32
~ 5.6
TW4-36
¢ NS
perched piezometer showing
concentration in mg/l
temporary perched monitoring well
installed September, 2013 showing
concentration in mgll
temporary perched monitoring well
installed May, 2014 (not sampled)
NOTE: MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19, and TW4-20 are chloroform pumping wells; TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 are nitrate pumping wells
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
KRIGED 2nd QUARTER, 2014 NITRATE (mg/L)
(NITRATE + NITRITE AS N)
WHITE MESA SITE
REP' ..HENCE
H :!718000/aug14/nitrate/Unt0614.srf
APPROVED DATE FIGURJ: -1
07/16/14
NS = not sampled; ND = not detected
......_ 100 kriged chloride isocon and label
MW-4
.40
TW4-1
0 37
TWN-1
~31
PIEZ-1
~52
TW4-32
~55
TW4-36
¢ NS
perched monitoring well showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched monitoring well
showing concentration in mg/L
temporary perched nitrate monitoring
well showing concentration in mg/L
perched piezometer showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched monitoring well
installed September, 2013 showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched monitoring well
installed May, 2014 (not sampled)
NOTE: MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19, and TW4-20 are chloroform pumping wells; TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 are nitrate pumping wells
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
KRIGED 2nd QUARTER, 2014 CHLORIDE (mg/L)
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE REFERENCE FIGURE
07/26/14 Hfl18000/aug14/chloride!Ucl0614.srf I-2
TabJ
Analyte Concentrations Over Time
Piezometer 1
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/19/2009 6.8 NA
7/14/2009 6.8 60
9/22/2009 7.3 78
10/27/2009 7.4 61
6/2/2010 7.2 52
7/19/2010 6.8 52
12/10/2010 6.5 60
1/31/2011 7 60
4/25/2011 6.8 58
7/25/2011 7 53
10/19/2011 6.6 55
1/11/2012 7.1 78
4/20/2012 6.6 58
7/27/2012 7.2 56
10/17/2012 7.66 55
2/18/2013 8.11 56.7
4/24/2013 8.88 53.3
8/28/2013 7.83 55.1
10/16/2013 6.68 54.1
1/13/2014 6.79 56.2
5/7/2014 7.57 52.1
Piezometer 2
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/19/2009 0.5 NA
7/14/2009 0.5 7
9/22/2009 0.5 17
10/27/2009 0.6 7
6/2/2010 0.6 8
7/19/2010 0.6 8
12/10/2010 0.2 6
1/31/2011 0.3 9
4/25/2011 0.3 8
7/25/2011 0.1 9
10/19/2011 0.1 8
1/11/2012 0.1 9
4/20/2012 0.2 8
7/27/2012 0.2 9
10/17/2012 0.192 9.5
2/19/2013 0.218 9.67
4/24/2013 0.172 10.3
8/28/2013 0.198 9.66
10/16/2013 0.364 9.22
1/13/2014 0.169 11.4
5/7/2014 0.736 11.4
Piezometer 3
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/19/2009 0.7 NA
7/14/2009 0.8 12
9/22/2009 0.8 24
10/27/2009 1.2 19
3/24/2010 1.7 116
6/2/2010 1.6 36
7/19/2010 1.6 35
12/10/2010 1.8 25
1/31/2011 1.8 40
4/25/2011 1.7 35
7/25/2011 1.8 61
10/19/2011 1.7 12
1/11/2012 1.8 20
4/20/2012 1.7 53
7/27/2012 1.8 21
10/17/2012 2.75 20.1
2/19/2013 1.85 21
4/24/2013 1.83 21.2
8/28/2013 1.81 22.4
10/16/2013 1.80 23.5
1/13/2014 1.70 26.0
5/7/2014 1.79 23.9
TWN-1
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/6/2009 0.7 19
7/21/2009 0.4 17
9/21/2009 0.4 19
10/28/2009 0.5 18
3/17/2010 0.5 17
5/26/2010 0.6 20
9/27/2010 0.6 19
12/7/2010 0.6 14
1/26/2011 0.5 17
4/20/2011 0.5 19
7/26/2011 0.5 14
10/17/2011 0.5 10
1/9/2012 0.6 15
4/18/2012 0.6 17
7/24/2012 0.6 17
10/15/2012 0.432 17.5
2/18/2013 0.681 17.6
4/23/2013 0.84 17.4
8/27/2013 1.24 24.1
10/16/2013 1.61 26.8
1/14/2014 1.47 29.2
5/6/2014 1.63 31.1
TWN-2
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/6/2009 25.4 29
7/21/2009 25 25
9/21/2009 22.6 17
11/2/2009 20.8 55
3/24/2010 62.1 85
6/2/2010 69 97
9/29/2010 69 104
12/9/2010 48 93
2/1/2011 43 93
4/28/2011 40 85
7/28/2011 33 74
10/20/2011 33 76
1/12/2012 31 86
4/20/2012 48 103
7/31/2012 54 93
10/17/2012 22.1 79
2/19/2013 57.3 80.5
4/24/2013 57.7 82.1
8/27/2013 80 75.9
10/16/2013 111 70.4
1/13/2014 42.6 72.4
5/7/2014 44.7 84.9
TWN-3
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/6/2009 23.6 96
7/21/2009 25.3 96
9/21/2009 27.1 99
11/2/2009 29 106
3/25/2010 25.3 111
6/3/2010 26 118
7/15/2010 27 106
12/10/2010 24 117
2/1/2011 24 138
4/28/2011 26 128
7/29/2011 25 134
10/20/2011 25 129
1/12/2012 25 143
4/20/2012 24 152
7/31/2012 27 158
10/17/2012 12.1 149
2/19/2013 22.2 157
4/24/2013 27.2 158
8/28/2013 20.9 171
10/17/2013 23.5 163
1/15/2014 19.6 160
5/7/2014 23.6 168
TWN-4
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/6/2009 1 13
7/21/2009 0.05 12
9/21/2009 0.4 13
10/28/2009 0.4 11
3/16/2010 0.9 22
5/27/2010 1.0 22
9/27/2010 0.9 19
12/8/2010 1 21
1/25/2011 0.9 21
4/20/2011 0.9 21
7/26/2011 1.1 35
10/18/2011 0.9 20
1/9/2012 0.9 20
4/18/2012 1.1 24
7/25/2012 1.4 25
10/15/2012 1.45 26.4
2/18/2013 1.51 25.3
4/23/2013 1.63 24.4
8/27/2013 1.58 27.2
10/16/2013 1.69 29.4
1/14/2014 1.41 28.4
5/6/2014 1.55 29.6
TWN-7
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
8/25/2009 ND 11
9/21/2009 ND 7
11/10/2009 0.1 7
3/17/2010 0.8 6
5/28/2010 1.2 6
7/14/2010 1.6 7
12/10/2010 1 4
1/27/2011 1.3 6
4/21/2011 1.7 6
7/29/2011 0.7 5
10/19/2011 2.2 6
1/11/2012 2.3 5
4/20/2012 1.2 6
7/26/2012 0.9 6
10/16/2012 0.641 5.67
2/19/2013 0.591 5.68
4/24/2013 1.16 5.88
8/28/2013 0.835 6.96
10/16/2013 0.986 5.70
1/15/2014 0.882 5.75
5/7/2014 0.564 5.26
TWN-18
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
11/2/2009 1.3 57
3/17/2010 1.6 42
6/1/2010 1.8 63
9/27/2010 1.8 64
12/9/2010 1.6 59
1/27/2011 1.4 61
4/26/2011 1.8 67
7/28/2011 1.8 65
10/18/2011 1.9 60
1/10/2012 1.9 64
4/19/2012 2.1 64
7/26/2012 2.3 67
10/16/2012 1.95 67.5
2/18/2013 2.27 68.7
4/23/2013 2.32 64.3
8/27/2013 2.04 70.4
10/16/2013 2.15 67.3
1/14/2014 2.33 68.4
5/6/2014 2.18 76.5
TW4-19
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
7/22/2002 42.80 12/7/2005 81
9/12/2002 47.60 3/9/2006 86
3/28/2003 61.40 7/20/2006 123
6/23/2003 11.40 11/9/2006 134
7/15/2003 6.80 2/28/2007 133
8/15/2003 4.00 8/15/2007 129
9/12/2003 5.70 10/10/2007 132
9/25/2003 9.20 3/26/2008 131
10/29/2003 7.70 6/25/2008 128
11/9/2003 4.80 9/10/2008 113
8/16/2004 9.91 10/15/2008 124
9/17/2004 4.50 3/4/2009 127
3/16/2005 5.30 6/23/2009 132
6/7/2005 5.70 9/14/2009 43
8/31/2005 4.60 12/14/2009 124
12/1/2005 0.10 2/17/2010 144
3/9/2006 4.00 6/9/2010 132
6/14/2006 5.20 8/16/2010 142
7/20/2006 4.30 10/11/2010 146
11/9/2006 4.60 2/17/2011 135
2/28/2007 4.00 6/7/2011 148
8/15/2007 4.10 8/17/2011 148
10/10/2007 4.00 11/17/2011 148
3/26/2008 2.20 1/23/2012 138
6/25/2008 2.81 6/6/2012 149
9/10/2008 36.20 9/5/2012 149
10/15/2008 47.80 10/3/2012 150
3/4/2009 3.20 2/11/2013 164
6/23/2009 2.40 6/5/2013 148
9/14/2009 0.10 9/3/2013 179
12/14/2009 26.70 10/29/2013 206
2/17/2010 2.00 1/27/2014 134
6/9/2010 4.40 5/19/2014 152
8/16/2010 5.90
10/11/2010 2.70
2/17/2011 17.00
6/7/2011 12.00
8/17/2011 3.00
11/17/2011 5.00
1/23/2012 0.60
6/6/2012 2.40
9/5/2012 2.50
10/3/2012 4.10
2/11/2013 7.99
6/5/2013 2.95
9/3/2013 17.60
10/29/2013 4.70
1/27/2014 1.62
5/19/2014 1.34
The sampling program for TW4-19 was updated in the fourth quarter of 2005
to include analysis for chloride as well as nitrate. This change accounts for the
different number of data points represented above.
TW4-21
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
5/25/2005 14.6 12/7/2005 353
8/31/2005 10.1 3/9/2006 347
11/30/2005 9.6 7/20/2006 357
3/9/2006 8.5 11/8/2006 296
6/14/2006 10.2 2/28/2007 306
7/20/2006 8.9 6/27/2007 327
11/8/2006 8.7 8/15/2007 300
2/28/2007 8.7 10/10/2007 288
6/27/2007 8.6 3/26/2008 331
8/15/2007 8.6 6/25/2008 271
10/10/2007 8.3 9/10/2008 244
3/26/2008 14.3 10/15/2008 284
6/25/2008 8.8 3/11/2009 279
9/10/2008 7.6 6/24/2009 291
10/15/2008 8.0 9/15/2009 281
3/11/2009 8.3 12/22/2009 256
6/24/2009 8.1 2/25/2010 228
9/15/2009 9.2 6/10/2010 266
12/22/2009 8.4 8/12/2010 278
2/25/2010 8.4 10/13/2010 210
6/10/2010 12.0 2/22/2011 303
8/12/2010 14.0 6/1/2011 297
10/13/2010 7.0 8/17/2011 287
2/22/2011 9.0 11/16/2011 276
6/1/2011 13.0 1/19/2012 228
8/17/2011 14.0 6/13/2012 285
11/16/2011 13.0 9/13/2012 142
1/19/2012 15.0 10/4/2012 270
6/13/2012 11.0 2/13/2013 221
9/13/2012 13.0 6/18/2013 243
10/4/2012 14.0 9/12/2013 207
2/13/2013 11.8 11/13/2013 206
6/18/2013 13.8 2/5/2014 200
9/12/2013 10.3 5/22/2014 243
11/13/2013 9.0
2/5/2014 11.4
5/22/2014 11.5
The sampling program for TW4-21 was updated in the fourth quarter of 2005
to include analysis for chloride as well as nitrate. This change accounts for the
different number of data points represented above.
TW4-22
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/28/2007 20.9 347
6/27/2007 19.3 273
8/15/2007 19.3 259
10/10/2007 18.8 238
3/26/2008 39.1 519
6/25/2008 41.9 271
9/10/2008 38.7 524
10/15/2008 36.3 539
3/11/2009 20.7 177
6/24/2009 20.6 177
9/15/2009 40.3 391
12/29/2009 17.8 175
3/3/2010 36.6 427
6/15/2010 19 134
8/12/2010 18 127
8/24/2010 15 130
10/13/2010 16 134
2/23/2011 18 114
6/1/2011 17 138
8/17/2011 15 120
11/16/2011 19 174
1/19/2012 14 36
6/13/2012 12.8 35
9/12/2012 7 121
10/4/2012 14 130
2/11/2013 58 635
6/5/2013 50.2 586
9/3/2013 29.7 487
10/29/2013 45.2 501
1/27/2014 54.6 598
5/19/2014 47.2 614
TW4-24
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
6/27/2007 26.1 770
8/15/2007 29 791
10/10/2007 24.7 692
3/26/2008 24.4 740
6/25/2008 45.3 834
9/10/2008 38.4 1180
10/15/2008 44.6 1130
3/4/2009 30.5 1010
6/24/2009 30.4 759
9/15/2009 30.7 618
12/17/2009 28.3 1080
2/25/2010 33.1 896
6/9/2010 30 639
8/11/2010 32 556
8/24/2010 31 587
10/6/2010 31 522
2/17/2011 31 1100
5/26/2011 35 1110
8/17/2011 34 967
11/16/2011 35 608
1/18/2012 37 373
6/6/2012 37 355
8/30/2012 37 489
10/3/2012 38 405
2/11/2013 35.9 1260
6/5/2013 23.7 916
9/3/2013 32.6 998
10/29/2013 34.6 1030
1/27/2014 31.6 809
5/19/2014 35 1020
TW4-25
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
6/27/2007 17.1 395
8/15/2007 16.7 382
10/10/2007 17 356
3/26/2008 18.7 374
6/25/2008 22.1 344
9/10/2008 18.8 333
10/15/2008 21.3 366
3/4/2009 15.3 332
6/24/2009 15.3 328
9/15/2009 3.3 328
12/16/2009 14.2 371
2/23/2010 14.4 296
6/8/2010 16 306
8/10/2010 14 250
10/5/2010 15 312
2/16/2011 15 315
5/25/2011 16 321
8/16/2011 16 276
11/15/2011 16 294
1/18/2012 16 304
5/31/2012 16 287
9/11/2012 17 334
10/3/2012 17 338
2/11/2013 9.04 190
6/5/2013 5.24 136
9/3/2013 5.69 119
10/29/2013 6.10 88.6
1/27/2014 2.16 85.7
5/19/2014 1.21 51.1
MW-30
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
6/22/2005 12.4 6/22/2005 125
9/22/2005 12.8 9/22/2005 125
12/14/2005 13.6 12/14/2005 128
3/22/2006 13.8 3/22/2006 125
6/21/2006 14.5 6/21/2006 124
9/13/2006 14.1 9/13/2006 118
10/25/2006 14.6 10/25/2006 124
3/15/2007 14.4 3/15/2007 125
8/22/2007 14.6 8/22/2007 126
10/24/2007 14.9 10/24/2007 122
3/19/2008 14.8 3/19/2008 118
6/3/2008 18.7 6/3/2008 125
8/4/2008 17.3 8/4/2008 121
11/5/2008 15.6 11/5/2008 162
2/3/2009 15.3 2/3/2009 113
5/13/2009 15.1 5/13/2009 122
8/24/2009 20.9 8/24/2009 118
10/14/2009 15.0 10/14/2009 129
1/20/2010 15.4 1/20/2010 106
2/9/2010 16.1 2/9/2010 127
4/27/2010 15.8 4/27/2010 97
5/24/2010 17.0 9/14/2010 111
6/15/2010 15.3 11/9/2010 126
8/24/2010 16.0 2/1/2011 134
9/14/2010 15.0 4/11/2011 134
10/19/2010 15.0 5/10/2011 128
11/9/2010 15.0 6/20/2011 127
12/14/2010 16.0 7/5/2011 127
1/10/2011 15.0 8/3/2011 126
2/1/2011 16.0 9/7/2011 145
3/14/2011 17.0 10/4/2011 129
4/11/2011 16.0 11/8/2011 122
5/10/2011 16.0 12/12/2011 124
6/20/2011 17.0 1/24/2012 124
7/5/2011 17.0 2/14/2012 126
8/3/2011 14.0 3/14/2012 128
9/7/2011 16.0 4/10/2012 128
10/4/2011 16.0 5/2/2012 124
11/8/2011 16.0 6/18/2012 131
12/12/2011 16.0 7/10/2012 128
1/24/2012 17.0 8/7/2012 139
2/14/2012 17.0 9/19/2012 130
3/14/2012 18.0 10/23/2012 135
4/10/2012 17.0 11/13/2012 114
5/2/2012 16.0 12/26/2012 122
MW-30
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
6/18/2012 15.0 1/23/2013 128
7/10/2012 17.0 2/26/2013 129
8/7/2012 18.0 3/20/2013 126
9/19/2012 16.0 4/17/2013 117
10/23/2012 16.2 5/15/2013 119
11/13/2012 18.5 6/25/2013 127
12/26/2012 17.2 7/10/2013 130
1/23/2013 19.2 8/20/2013 126
2/26/2013 21.4 9/18/2013 131
3/20/2013 14.3 10/22/2013 128
4/17/2013 16.8 11/20/2013 124
5/15/2013 18.8 12/18/2013 134
6/25/2013 16.1 1/8/2014 131
7/10/2013 17.6 2/25/2014 135
8/20/2013 16.4 3/11/2014 144
9/18/2013 16.9 6/3/2014 128
10/22/2013 19.7
11/20/2013 19.5
12/18/2013 20.7
1/8/2014 24.0
2/25/2014 18.4
3/11/2014 21.3
6/3/2014 19.4
Under the groundwater sampling progran, accelerated monitoring for nitrate began in MW-
30 prior to when the accelerated monitoring for chloride began. This difference accounts for
the different number of data points represented above.
MW-31
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
6/22/2005 24.2 6/22/2005 139
9/22/2005 22.4 9/22/2005 136
12/14/2005 23.8 12/14/2005 135
3/22/2006 24.1 3/22/2006 133
6/21/2006 25.3 6/21/2006 138
9/13/2006 24.6 9/13/2006 131
10/25/2006 25.1 10/25/2006 127
3/15/2007 23.2 3/15/2007 132
3/15/2007 22.0 3/15/2007 132
8/27/2007 23.3 8/27/2007 136
10/24/2007 24.6 10/24/2007 122
3/19/2008 25.0 3/19/2008 124
6/3/2008 29.3 6/3/2008 128
8/4/2008 28.7 8/4/2008 124
11/11/2008 29.9 11/11/2008 119
2/3/2009 23.4 2/3/2009 115
5/13/2009 22.4 5/13/2009 124
8/24/2009 15.4 8/24/2009 122
10/14/2009 22.6 10/14/2009 138
2/9/2010 21.7 2/9/2010 128
4/20/2010 22.5 4/20/2010 128
5/21/2010 23.0 9/13/2010 139
6/15/2010 21.1 11/9/2010 138
8/24/2010 22.0 2/1/2011 145
9/13/2010 21.0 4/1/2011 143
10/19/2010 20.0 5/10/2011 143
11/9/2010 20.0 6/20/2011 145
12/14/2010 20.0 7/5/2011 148
1/10/2011 19.0 8/2/2011 148
2/1/2011 21.0 9/6/2011 148
3/14/2011 22.0 10/3/2011 145
4/1/2011 21.0 11/8/2011 145
5/10/2011 20.0 12/12/2011 148
6/20/2011 22.0 1/24/2012 155
7/5/2011 22.0 2/13/2012 150
8/2/2011 20.0 3/13/2012 152
9/6/2011 21.0 4/9/2012 160
10/3/2011 21.0 5/2/2012 151
11/8/2011 21.0 6/18/2012 138
12/12/2011 21.0 7/9/2012 161
1/24/2012 21.0 8/6/2012 175
2/13/2012 21.0 9/18/2012 172
3/13/2012 22.0 10/22/2012 157
4/9/2012 21.0 11/6/2012 189
5/2/2012 20.0 12/18/2012 170
MW-31
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
6/18/2012 21.6 1/22/2013 176
7/9/2012 21.0 2/19/2013 174
8/6/2012 21.0 3/19/2013 168
9/18/2012 21.0 4/16/2013 171
10/22/2012 18.0 5/13/2013 169
11/6/2012 23.6 6/24/2013 179
12/18/2012 22.2 7/9/2013 182
1/22/2013 22.8 8/19/2013 183
2/19/2013 19.3 9/17/2013 193
3/19/2013 19.1 10/23/2013 188
4/16/2013 18.8 11/18/2013 174
5/13/2013 23.8 12/17/2013 203
6/24/2013 20.0 1/7/2014 194
7/9/2013 21.7 2/17/2014 197
8/19/2013 16.0 3/10/2014 230
9/17/2013 21.2 6/2/2014 173
10/23/2013 21.2
11/18/2013 23.9
12/17/2013 24.2
1/7/2014 24.0
2/17/2014 20.6
3/10/2014 26.2
6/2/2014 23.1
Under the groundwater sampling progran, accelerated monitoring for nitrate
began in MW-31 prior to when the accelerated monitoring for chloride began.
This difference accounts for the different number of data points represented
above.
TabK
Concentration Trend Graphs
Cl) c 0 '.t:i m ... -c C1)
() c
0 0
C1) -m ... :t:: z
T"" ... s C1)
E ~ c::
0 ,.....
' v ~
1\
41
~
~
f
~,
(()
v~-oaa
~
-£~-Bnv
~
~
~
~ 0~-AON
r-~ -
~~
eo-qa.:J
I{) C\1 0
(1J6W)
tn c:::
0 ·.;:::;
C'CS lo. -c::: C1) u c:::
0 0
C1)
'tJ 'i:
.2
J: 0 ,..
lo.
C1) -C1)
E 0 N C1) c:
~----r-----~----~----~----~----.-----~-----.-----r v~-080
~ v~-unr
-8 ~-AON
-U-PO
6 ~ -Jdy
~ ~-d8S
~ ~-q8.:J
o ~ -ony
-o~-uer
~----+-----~----~-----+----~------~----+-----~-----+BQ-080
0 0) 0 00 0 <D 0 0
l.() ""'" (1/6W)
0 ('I) 0 C\1 0 0 ,....
en c 0 ; m
""" .... c G)
(,) c 0 0
~
""" ~ z
N
""" G)
G)
E 0 N G) c::
...
CX)
c:i
~ ~
~ -~ ~
~
~
·~~
~~
~~ ~~
~
~ -----~....------
~
~ ...... ._..,. ~
<0
c:i
~
~
(1/6W)
>~
C\J
c:i
T"""
c:i
v~-oao
. £ ~ -5nv
O~·AON
ao-qa.:1
0
tn s:: 0 ·;
to.. -s::
C1) u s:: 0 0
C1)
"C
to..
0
J:
0
N
to.. ! C1)
E 0 N .!!! c..
co C\1
~
" ~
~~
~
~
~
•
~v~
~~
i
~
0 <D
(1J6w)
v~-oaa
v~-unr
8~-AON
. 8 ~-keii'J
.
-~ ~-das
o ~ -onv
o~-u-er
6o-1nr
so-oaa
0
(/) c
0 .. cu 11.. -c Cl)
(.) c 0 0
Cl) -ca ...
~ z
C") ...
Cl) -Cl)
E 0 N .!!
Q.
~------~--------~------~--------~------~~------~v~-oaa
8 ~ -5nv
. c ~ -Jd'v'
-0~-AON
so-1nr
1--------+------1-------+-------t-----+-----1-so-qa.:J
C\J
(1/6W)
LO
c::i
0
In c
0 ; ca 1l.o .... c CD (,) c
0 0
CD ,
'i:
.2
J: 0
M
1l.o
CD .... CD E 0 N CD c::
~-----,,------,------~------~-------r-------r------~v~-oao
. v~-unr
-8~·/\0N
c~·PO
· c ~-Jdy
~ ~-das
-~ ~-qa.:J
o ~-onv
-o~-uer
eo-1nr
r-----~r-----_,------~-------+-------+-------r-------+so-oao
0 C\J 0 0 0 C()
(1J6W)
0 <0 0 '<:t 0 C\J 0
0 c 0 ~ -c G.)
(,) c 0
(.)
i ... .t: z ,....
I z ~
..
> 4 --...
co
~ ~ " >
..-co
c:i
(1J5W)
~
\
~
~
~~~~p
~ ~
\
~~
/
/'
co
c:i
C\1
0
.
0
v~-oaa
£~·5nv
0 ~-/\ON
so-qa.:J
0 c
0
':.j:O cu ... -c Cl)
(.) c 0 0
Cl)
"C "i:
.2 .t:. 0
'I'"" I z ~
~----~r-----~-------,------~------~------~-------r v~-oaa
c ~-JdV
0~-/\0N
~-----4------~------4-------+-----~~-----+-------+Bo-qa~
0 ('I')
ll)
C\J 0 C\J
ll) 0 ll) 0 ..-
en c
0 '+=0 tU ... -c
G)
(,) c 0 0
G) -tU ... . t: z
N I z ;:
1-
.--------.---------,--------~--------.--------.--------~v~-oaa
8 ~ -onv
l ~ -JdV
-0~-/\0N
1------t------+----+------+----t------+ so-qa.:J
0 C\J
r"
0 0 ,...
0 (() 0 c.o
(1t6w)
0 C\J 0
tn c 0 ... C'a lo.o -c Cl)
(.) c 0 0
Cl)
'tJ 'i:
0
.c 0
C\1 I z
3\: 1-
~------~--------~------~--------~------~--------~v~-oaa
c ~ -Jd'v'
0~-AON
• 6o-1nr
~------~-------4--------+--------+--------~-------+ao-qa~
0 C\1 ..--
0 0 ,.....
0 CXl 0 <0 0 C\1 0
(/) c 0 ':;::;
tU ... -c
Cl)
(,) c 0 (.)
Cl) -tU ... • t::: z
CW) I z 3: 1-
r-------~----~------~------~------~-------r-------r v~-oaa
£~-5nv
-G ~-JdV
0 ~-/\ON
~----~-------+------~------+-------r------+-------+90-qa~
lO (') 0 (') lO C\1 0 C\1 lO 0 0 ,.... ,....
(1J6W)
rn
s::::: 0 ... ca :1.. -s::::: C1)
(J
s::::: 0
()
C1)
"C
'i:
0
J:
()
('I)
I z ~
r-----~----~----~----~------r-----~----~----~-----r v~-~aa
£~-Bnv
-c~-JdV
• O~·AON
· 60·1nr
~----~--~r---~~--_,----~-----+-----+-----+-----+90-qa~
0 00 ..-
0 <0 0
""" T"""
0 C\J 0 0 ..-
0 00 0 (!) 0 C\J 0
Ill c 0 ·.;; m ... -c Cl)
(J c 0
0
Cl) -m ... ~ z
"':t I z ~ 1-
r-----.-----~----------~-----,,-----~----------~-----r v~-oaa
£ ~-Bnv
G~·JdV
O~·AON
· 60·1nr
r-----r---~r---~----_,-----+-----+-----+-----r-----+80-qa~
T'" co
0
(1t6w)
(!)
0 C\J
0
0
In c
0 ·.;::; cu
""" -c Cl)
(,) c
0 0
Cl)
"C 'i: 0
.c
0
o::t I z
3: 1-
~----~----~------~----~------~----~------r------.t~-080
8 ~-Bnv
c ~ -Jd'v'
-0 ~-AON
6o-1nr
~----;------+------~----,_-----+----~~----+------+80-qa~
I{)
C') 0 C')
I{)
C\1 0 C\1
(1t6w)
0 0
~--------~----------~--------~----------~--------~v~-~aa
-v~-unr
8 ~-/\ON
1/J -~~-PO c 0
+::0 co lo.. -c Cl) c.> c ~ ~ -Jd'v' 0 0
Cl) -co lo.. .'!::::: z • ~ ~-das ...... I z 3: 1-
-~ ~-qa.:J
o ~ -onv
0~-uer
1-------+---------+-------1--------1-------+ 5o-1nr
C\1 l() 0
c)
(1/6W)
r--------.--------.--------.--------,--------,---------r v~-080
v~-unr
£ ~-AON
G~-PO
t/1 c 0 ':t:i cu ... -G~-Jd'v' c G)
(,) c 0 0
G)
"C ~ ~-d8S 'i: 0 -s::.
0
....... I z ~ ~ -q8.:J 3: 1-
o ~ -f3nv
-o ~-uer
60-1nr
~-------+--------+-------~--------,_------~~-------+90-080
0 co CD 0
(1/6W)
tn c:
0 ; as .... ... c:
Q)
(.) c:
0 0
Q) ... as .... .:t::: z
co ,....
I z ~
~---------r----------~---------r----------~---------r v~-oao
v~-unr
• 8~-AON
8 ~-keV\1
-c~-PO
c ~ -Jdy
• ~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.::J
o ~ -onv
o~-uer
1------+-------+----~1-------+------+ ao-1nr
C\J l.()
c)
0
Cl)
1: 0 ·~ as '--1: C1) u 1: 0 ()
Q)
"C 'i:
0
.I:
()
co ,...
I z ~
0 0) 0 <X)
"
~
~
~
~ 11
~
\ ~
~/ ~
..... ~ t/
0 (0
/
0 0 LO 'V
(1f6W)
0 ('I) 0 N 0
-
-
-
0
v~-unr
8~-AON
8 ~ -ABV'J
~~-des
~ ~ -qe.::J
o ~ -onv
o~-uer
6o-1nr
0 0 0
..... 0 0 0
N 0 0 0
w 0 0 0
~ 0
0 0
1.11 0
0 0
0"1 0 0 0
-...J 0 0 0
7/1/2002 I
11/1/2002 ~
3/1/2003
7/1/2003 .
11/1/2003
3/1/2004
7/1/2004
11/1/2004
3/1/2005
7/1/2005
11/1/2005
3/1/2006
7/1/2006
11/1/2006
3/1/2007
7/1/2007
11/1/2007
3/1/2008 _,
7/1/2008
11/1/2008
3/1/2009 •.
7/1/2009
11/1/2009 i . 1 1 •
3/1/2010
7/1/2010
11/1/2010 .
3/1/2011
7/1/2011
11/1/2011
3/1/2012
7/1/2012
11/1/2012 .
3/1/2013 .
7/1/2013
11/1/2013
3/1/2014
-4 :e ~ I .....
U)
z ;:::;:
Cil ,...
t1)
n
0 ~ n
t1)
~ ,...
Cil ,... -· 0
~
"'
0
12/1/2005
3/1/2006
6/1/2006
9/1/2006
12/1/2006
3/1/2007
6/1/2007
9/1/2007
12/1/2007
3/1/2008 .
6/1/2008 .
9/1/2008
12/1/2008
3/1/2009
6/1/2009 .
9/1/2009
12/1/2009
3/1/2010
6/1/2010
9/1/2010 -
12/1/2010
3/1/2011
6/1/2011
9/1/2011
12/1/2011 .
3/1/2012
6/1/2012
9/1/2012
12/1/2012
3/1/2013 -
6/1/2013
9/1/2013
12/1/2013
3/1/2014 ..
VI 0
...... 0 0
...... V1 0
N 0 0
N VI 0
-f :e ~ I ~
U)
n :::r -0
""" -· c..
t1)
n 0
~ n t1)
~ ,...
""" QJ ,... -· 0
~ (I)
0 0
5/1/2005
8/1/2005
11/1/2005
2/1/2006
5/1/2006
8/1/2006
11/1/2006
2/1/2007
5/1/2007
8/1/2007
11/1/2007
2/1/2008
5/1/2008
8/1/2008
11/1/2008
2/1/2009
5/1/2009
8/1/2009
11/1/2009
2/1/2010
5/1/2010 -
8/1/2010 .I
11/1/2010
2/1/2011 ~
5/1/2011
8/1/2011 •.
11/1/2011
2/1/2012
5/1/2012 -
8/1/2012
11/1/2012 -
2/1/2013
5/1/2013
8/1/2013 ..
11/1/2013
2/1/2014 •.
5/1/2014
N 0 ~ 0
CJ)
0 00 0
.... 0 0
.... N 0
.... ~ 0
.... CJ)
0
-4 ~ ~ I N ....,a.
z -· "' ""'' DJ "' tD
n 0
::::J n tD
::::J
"' ""'' DJ "' -· 0
::::J
"'
0
12/1/2005
3/1/2006
6/1/2006
9/1/2006
12/1/2006
3/1/2007
6/1/2007
9/1/2007
12/1/2007
3/1/2008 -
6/1/2008
9/1/2008
12/1/2008 •.
3/1/2009
6/1/2009
9/1/2009
12/1/2009
3/1/2010
6/1/2010
9/1/2010
12/1/2010
3/1/2011
6/1/2011
9/1/2011
12/1/2011
3/1/2012
6/1/2012
9/1/2012
12/1/2012
3/1/2013
6/1/2013
9/1/2013
12/1/2013 -
3/1/2014 .
l/'1 0
..... 0 0
..... l/'1 0
N 0 0
N l/'1 0
w 0 0
w l/'1 0
+:o 0 0
.... ~ I N ~
n :::r -0 .... -· a..
tD n 0
::J n
tD
::J ,...
Ql ,... -· 0
::J Cl)
V) c
0 ·-...,
~ ..., c
GJ u c
0 u
GJ ...,
~ ..., ·-z
N N I ll::t ~ 1-
"' s::::
0 ·-+"' ~ +"' s:::: cu u s::::
0 u
cu
"'C ·-...
0
..c::: u
N
N I "" ~
0 0 I'
0 0 1..0
0 0 Ll"l
0 0
""" l/3W
0 0 m
0 0 N
0 0 .-I
0
V)
c:
0 ·-....,
ns '-....,
c:
Q) u c:
0 u
Q) ....,
E ...., ·-z
~ N I ~ s 1-
0 L/') L/') '<:t L/') m 0 m L/') N
l/8W
0 N
L/')
.-I
L/') 0
V) c: 0 ·-....,
~ ....,
c:
Q) u c:
0 u
Q) -c
·~
0
..c: u
~ N I ~ 1-
0 0 <:!" .-I
0 0 N .-I
0 0 0 .-I
0 0 00
0 0 1.0
0 0 <:!"
0 0 N
0
(/) c
0 ·-...,
~ ...,
c cv u c
0 u
cv ...,
~ ..., ·-z
Ln
N
I lll::t 3: 1-
1/SW
V) c:
0 ·-+' ~
+' c:
CIJ u c:
0 u
CIJ
""C
·~ 0
.s::. u
Ln N I lll::t 3: t-
0
Ll') '<t
0 0 '<t
0 Ll')
("()
0 0 ("()
0 Ll')
N
0 0 N
0 Ll')
rl
0 0 rl
0 Ll') 0
...... !=' U'1 0
0 0 0
6/1/2005
9/1/2005
12/1/2005
3/1/2006
6/1/2006
9/1/2006
12/1/2006
3/1/2007
6/1/2007
9/1/2007 .
12/1/2007 -
3/1/2008
6/1/2008
9/1/2008
12/1/2008
3/1/2009
6/1/2009 .
9/1/2009
12/1/2009 .
3/1/2010
6/1/2010
9/1/2010
12/1/2010
3/1/2011 .
6/1/2011
9/1/2011
12/1/2011
3/1/2012
6/1/2012
9/1/2012
12/1/2012
3/1/2013
6/1/2013
9/1/2013 ..
12/1/2013 •.
3/1/2014 -
6/1/2014
...... N N U'1 0 U'1 0 0 0
(J.J
0 0
s:
:E I w 0
z ;:;:
"""" QJ ,...
tD
n 0 ::::s n tD ::::s ,...
"""" QJ ,... -· 0 ::::s
U'l
0
6/1/2005
9/1/2005
12/1/2005
3/1/2006
6/1/2006 .
9/1/2006
12/1/2006
3/1/2007
6/1/2007
9/1/2007
12/1/2007
3/1/2008
6/1/2008
9/1/2008
12/1/2008 -
3/1/2009
6/1/2009
9/1/2009
12/1/2009
3/1/2010
6/1/2010
9/1/2010
12/1/2010
3/1/2011
6/1/2011
9/1/2011
12/1/2011 ..
3/1/2012
6/1/2012 -
9/1/2012
12/1/2012
3/1/2013
6/1/2013
9/1/2013
12/1/2013
3/1/2014
6/1/2014
1\.)
0 .1::> 0 0'\ 0 00 0
1-' 0 0
1-' 1\.)
0
1-' ~ 1-' 0'\ 0
1-' 00 0
3:
~ I w
0
n ::r -0 .., -· c.
tD
n 0
::::J n tD
::::J r+
Q]
r+ -· 0
::::J
"'
0 0
6/1/2005
9/1/2005
12/1/2005
3/1/2006
6/1/2006
9/1/2006
12/1/2006 _,
3/1/2007
6/1/2007
9/1/2007
12/1/2007
3/1/2008 .
6/1/2008
9/1/2008
12/1/2008
3/1/2009
6/1/2009
9/1/2009
12/1/2009 .
3/1/2010 -
6/1/2010
9/1/2010
12/1/2010
3/1/2011
6/1/2011
9/1/2011
12/1/2011
3/1/2012 -
6/1/2012
9/1/2012
12/1/2012
3/1/2013
6/1/2013
9/1/2013
12/1/2013
3/1/2014
6/1/2014
U'1
0
..... 0 0
..... U'1
0
N 0 0
N U'1
0
w 0 0
w U'1
0
s
:E I w .....
z ;:;:
""' OJ r+ tD n 0 ::::s n tD ::::s r+
Ql r+ -· 0
::::s
"'
6/1/2005
9/1/2005
12/1/2005
3/1/2006
6/1/2006
9/1/2006
12/1/2006
3/1/2007
6/1/2007
9/1/2007
0
12/1/2007 -
3/1/2008 "i
6/1/2008 ..
9/1/2008 •.
12/1/2008
3/1/2009
6/1/2009
9/1/2009
12/1/2009 -
3/1/2010 .
6/1/2010
9/1/2010
12/1/2010
3/1/2011
6/1/2011
9/1/2011
12/1/2011 .,
3/1/2012
6/1/2012
9/1/2012 -
12/1/2012 ..
3/1/2013
6/1/2013
9/1/2013
12/1/2013
3/1/2014
6/1/2014
V1 0
1-' 0 0
1-' V1 0
N 0 0
N V1 0
s
:E I w ...,a.
n J -0
"""' -· Q.
tt)
n 0
:::::s n
tt)
:::::s
r1'
"""' QJ
r1' -· 0
:::::s (/)
TabL
CSV Transmittal Letter
Kathy Weinel
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Dear Mr. Lundberg,
Kathy Weinel
Monday, August 18,2014 10:47 AM
Rusty Lundberg
'Phil Goble'; 'Dean Henderson'; Harold Roberts; David Frydenlund; Frank Filas, P.E; Scott
Bakken; David Turk; Jaime Massey; Dan Hillsten
Transmittal of CSV Files White Mesa Mill 2014 02 Nitrate Monitoring
1405196-EDD.csv
Attached to this e-mail is an electronic copy of laboratory results for nitrate monitoring conducted at the White Mesa
Mill during the second quarter of 2014, in Comma Separated Value (CSV) format.
Please contact me at 303-389-4134 if you have any questions on this transmittal.
Yours Truly
Kathy Weinel
1