DRC-2014-003463 - 0901a0688043d718

ENERGYFUELS
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Blvd. Suite 600
Lakewood, CO, US, 80228
303 974 2140
www.energyfuels.com
May 19, 2014
Sent VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY DRC-2014-003463
Mr. Rusty Lundberg
Division of Radiation Control
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144850
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Re: Transmittal of 1st Quarter 2014 Nitrate Monitoring Report
Stipulation and Consent Order Docket Number UGW12-04 White Mesa Uranium Mill
Dear Mr. Lundberg:
Enclosed are two copies of the White Mesa Uranium Mill Nitrate Monitoring Report for the 1st
Quarter of 2014 as required by the Stipulation and Consent Order Docket Number UGW12-04, as well
as two CDs each containing a word searchable electronic copy of the report.
If you should have any questions regarding this report please contact me.
Yours veryv-truly,
ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC.
Kathy Weinel
Quality Assurance Manager
cc: David C. Frydenlund
Dan Hillsten
Harold R. Roberts
David E. Turk
Frank Filas
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Nitrate Monitoring Report
State of Utah
Stipulated Consent Agreement, January 2009
Docket No. UGW09-03
1st Quarter
(January through March)
2014
Prepared by:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Boulevard, Suite 600
Lakewood, CO 80228
May 19,2014
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1
2.0 GROUNDWATER NITRATE MONITORING ................................................ !
2.1 Samples and Measurements Taken During the Quarter ..................................... 1
2.1.1 Nitrate Monitoring ...................................................................................... 2
2.1.2 Parameters Analyzed ................................................................................... 3
2.1.3 Groundwater Head and Level Monitoring .................................................. 3
2.2 Sampling Methodology and Equipment and Decontamination Procedures ....... 3
2.2.1 Well Purging, Sampling and Depth to Groundwater .................................. 4
2.2.2 Piezometer Sampling .................................................................................. 5
2.3 Field Data ............................................................................................................ 5
2.4 Depth to Groundwater Data and Water Table Contour Map .............................. 5
2.5 Laboratory Results .............................................................................................. 5
2.5.1 Copy of Laboratory Results ........................................................................ 5
2.5.2 Regulatory Framework ............................................................................... 5
3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND DATA VALIDATION ................................... 6
3.1 Field QC Samples ........ -....................................................................................... 6
3.2 Adherence to Mill Sampling SOPs ..................................................................... 6
3.3 Analyte Completeness Review ........................................................................... 7
3.4 Data Validation .............................................................................. ; .................... 7
3.4.1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation .................................................................... 7
3.4.2 Holding Time Evaluation ............................................................................ 8
3.4.3 Analytical Method Checklist ...................................................................... 8
3.4.4 Reporting Limit Evaluation ........................................................................ 8
3.4.5 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates ................................................. 9
3.4.6 Other Laboratory QA/QC ........................................................................... 9
3.4.7 Receipt Temperature Evaluation ............................................................... 10
3.4.8 Rinsate Check ............................................................................... -............ 10
4.0 INTERPRETATION OF DATA ....................................................................... 10
4.1 Interpretation of Groundwater Levels, Gradients and Flow Directions ........... 10
4.1.1 Cunent Site Groundwater Contour Map ................................................... 10
4.1 .2 Comp-~i on of Current Groundwat~r Contour Map to Groundwater Contour Ma_p
for Pre iou1; Quarter ................................................................................... l
4.1.3 Hydrographs .............................................................................................. 15
4.1.4 Depth to Groundwater Measured and Groundwater Elevation ................. 15
4.2 Effectiveness of Hydraulic Containment and Capture ....................................... 15
4.2.1 Hydraulic Containment and Control.. ...................................................... 15
4.2.2 Current Nitrate and Chloride Isoconcentration Maps ............................... 18
4.2.3 Comparison of Areal Extent ............................................................................ 18
4.2.4 Nitrate and Chloride Concentration Trend Data and Graphs .................... 19
4.2.5 Interpretation of Analytical Data .............................................................. 19
4.3 Estimation of Pumped Nitrate Mass and Residual Nitrate Mass within the Plume
.......................................................................................................................... 21
5.0 LONG TERM PUMP TEST AT TWN-02, TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-25
OPERATIONS REPORT .................................................................................. 22
5.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 22
1
5.2
5.3
5.4
6.0
6.1
7.0
8.0
9.0
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Table 5
Table 6
Table 7
Table 8
Pumping Well Data Collection ......................................................................... 23
Water Level Measurements .............................................................................. 23
Pumping Rates and Volumes ............................................................................ 23
CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT ................................................................. 24
Assessment of Previous Quarter's Conecti ve Actions ..................................... 24
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................ 24
ELECTRONIC DATA FILES AND FORMAT .............................................. 27
SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION ........................................................... 28
LIST OF TABLES
Summary of Well Sampling and Constituents for the Period
Nitrate Mass Removal Per Well Per Quarter
Nitrate Well Pumping Rates and Volumes
Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate mass Removed and Total Volume of Water
Pumped
Nitrate Data Over Time for MW-30, MW-31, MW-5, and MW-11
Slug Test Results
Pre-Pumping Saturated Thickness
Pre-Pumping Hydraulic Gradients and Flow Calculations
11
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
Tab B Order of Sampling and Field Data Worksheets
Tab C Kriged Current Quarter Groundwater Contour Map and Weekly, Monthly and Quarterly
Depth to Water Data
Tab D Kriged Previous Quarter Groundwater Contour Map
Tab E Hydrographs of Groundwater Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab F Depths to Groundwater and Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab G Laboratory Analytical Reports
Tab H Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
H-1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation
H-2 Holding Time Evaluation
H-3 Analytical Method Check
H-4 Reporting Limit Evaluation
H-5 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
H-6 QC Control limits for Analysis and Blanks
H-7 Receipt Temperature Evaluation
H-8 Rinsate Evaluation
Tab I Kriged Current Quarter Nitrate and Chloride Isoconcentration Maps
Tab J Analyte Concentration Data Over Time
Tab K Nitrate and Chloride Concentration Trend Graphs
Tab L CSV Transmittal Letter
iii
AWAL
CA
CAP
CIR
DIFB
DRC
EFRI
ft amsl
GWDP
LCS
MS
MSD
QA
QAP
QC
RPD
sco
SOPs
UDEQ
voc
ACRONYM LIST
American West Analytical Laboratory
Consent Agreement
Corrective Action Plan
Contamination Investigation Report
Deionized Field Blanks
Utah Division of Radiation Control
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
feet above mean sea level
Groundwater Discharge Permit
Laboratory Control Spike
Matrix Spike
Matrix Spike Duplicate
Quality Assurance
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan
Quality Control
Relative Percent Difference
Stipulated Consent Order
Standard Operating Procedures
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
Volatile Organic Compounds
iv
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Utah Department of Environmental Quality ("UDEQ") Division of Radiation Control
("DRC") noted in a Request dated September 30, 2008 (the "Request"), for a Voluntary Plan and
Schedule to Investigate and Remediate Nitrate Contamination at the White Mesa Uranium Mill
(the "Mill") (the "Plan"), that nitrate levels have exceeded the State water quality standard of 10
mg/L in certain monitoring wells. As a result of the Request, Energy Fuels Resources (USA)
Inc. ("EFRI") entered into a Stipulated Consent Agreement with the Utah Water Quality Board
in January 2009 which directed the preparation of a Nitrate Contamination Investigation Report
("CIR"). A subsequent letter dated December 1, 2009, among other things, recommended that
EFRI also address elevated chloride concentrations in the CIR. The Stipulated Consent
Agreement was amended in August 2011. Under the amended Consent Agreement ("CA"),
EFRI submitted a Corrective Action Plan ("CAP"), pursuant to the requirements of the Utah
Groundwater Quality Protection Rules [UAC R317-6-6.15(C-E)] on November 29, 2011 and
revised versions of the CAP on Febmary 27, 2012 and May 7, 2012. On December 12, 2012,
DRC signed the Stipulation and Consent Order ("SCO"), Docket Number UGW12-04, which
approved the EFRI CAP, dated May 7, 2012. The SCO ordered EFRI to fully implement all
elements of the May 7, 2012 CAP.
Based on the schedule included in the CAP and as delineated and approved by the SCO, all
activities associated with the implementation of the CAP began in January 2013. The reporting
requirements specified in the CAP and SCO are included in this quarterly nitrate report.
This is the Quarterly Nitrate Monitoring Report, as required under the SCO, State of UDEQ
Docket No. UGW12-04 for the first quarter of 2014. This report meets the requirements of the
SCO, State of UDEQ Docket No. UGW12-04 and is the document which covers nitrate
corrective action and monitoring activities during the first quarter of 2014.
2.0 GROUNDWATER NITRATE MONITORING
2.1 Samples and Measurements Taken During the Quarter
A map showing the location of all groundwater monitoring wells, piezometers, existing wells,
temporary chloroform contaminant investigation wells and temporary nitrate investigation wells
is attached under Tab A. Nitrate samples and measurements taken during this reporting period
are discussed in the remainder of this section.
1
2.1.1 Nitrate Monitoring
Quarterly sampling for nitrate monitoring parameters was performed in the following wells:
TWN-1
TWN-2
TWN-3
TWN-4
TWN-7
TWN-18
TW4-22*
TW4-24*
TW4-25*
Piezometer 1
Piezometer 2
Piezometer 3
As discussed in Section 2.1.2 the analytical constituents required by the CAP are inorganic
chloride and nitrate+nitrite as N (referred to as nitrate in this document)
* Wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25 are chloroform investigation wells (wells installed and
sampled primarily for the chloroform investigation) and are sampled as part of the chloroform
program. The analytical suite for these three wells includes nitrate, chloride and a select list of
Volatile Organic Compounds ("VOCs") as specified in the chloroform program. These three
wells are included here because they are being pumped as part of the remediation of the nitrate
contamination as required by the SCO and the CAP. The nitrate and chloride data are included
in this report as well as in the chloroform program quarterly report. The VOC data for these
three wells will be reported in the chloroform quarterly monitoring report only.
The December 12, 2012 SCO approved the CAP, which specified the cessation of sampling in
TWN-5, TWN-6, TWN-8, TWN-9, TWN-10, TWN-11, TWN-12, TWN-13, TWN-14, TWN-15,
TWN-16, TWN-17, and TWN-19. Per the CAP and SCO, these wells were not sampled during
this quarter. Additionally, the CAP and SCO approved the abandonment of TWN-5, TWN-8,
TWN-9, TWN-10, TWN-11, TWN-12, TWN-13, TWN-15, and TWN-17 within 1 year of the
SCO approval. These wells were abandoned in accordance with the DRC-approved Well
Abandonment Procedure on July 31, 2013. Wells TWN-6, TWN-14, TWN-16, and TWN-19
have been maintained for depth to groundwater monitoring only, as noted in the CAP.
Table 1 provides an overview of all locations sampled during the current period, along with the
date samples were collected from each location, and the date(s) upon which analytical data were
received from the contract laboratory. Table 1 also identifies rinsate samples collected, as well
as sample numbers associated with any required duplicates.
As indicated in Table 1, nitrate monitoring was performed in the nitrate monitoring wells,
chloroform wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25 and Piezometers 1, 2, and 3. Analytical data for
all of the above-listed wells, and the piezometers, are included in Tab G.
Nitrate and chloride are also monitored in all of the Mill's groundwater monitoring wells and
chloroform investigation wells. Data from those wells for this quarter are incorporated in certain
maps and figures in this report but are discussed in their respective programmatic reports.
2
2.1.2 Parameters Analyzed
Locations sampled during this reporting period were analyzed for the following constituents:
• Inorganic Chloride
• Nitrate plus Nitrite as Nitrogen (referred to herein as nitrate)
Use of analytical methods consistent with the requirements found in the White Mesa Mill
Groundwater Quality Assurance Plan, ("QAP") Revision 7.2, dated June 6, 2012 was confirmed
for all analytes, as discussed later in this report.
2.1.3 Groundwater Head and Level Monitoring
Depth to groundwater was measured in the following wells and/or piezometers, pursuant to Part
I.E.3 of the Groundwater Discharge Permit ("GWDP") (dated August 24, 2012):
• The quarterly groundwater compliance monitoring wells
• Existing well MW -4 and all of the temporary chloroform investigation wells
• Piezometers-P-1, P-2, P-3, P-4 and P-5
• MW-20, MW-22, and MW-34
• The DR piezometers that were installed during the Southwest Hydrogeologic
Investigation
• Nitrate wells TWN-01, TWN-02, TWN-03, TWN-04, TWN-06, TWN-07, TWN-14,
TWN-16, TWN-18 and TWN-19
In addition to the above, depth to water measurements are routinely observed in conjunction with
sampling events for all wells sampled during quarterly and accelerated efforts, regardless of the
sampling purpose.
All well levels used for groundwater contour mapping were measured and recorded within 5
calendar days of each other as indicated by the measurement dates in the summary sheet under
Tab C. Field data sheets for groundwater measurements are also provided in Tab C.
Weekly and monthly depth to groundwater measurements were taken in the chloroform pumping
wells MW-4, MW-26, TW4-19, TW4-20, and TW4-4, and the nitrate pumping wells TW4-22,
TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2. In addition, monthly water level measurements were taken in
non-pumping wells MW-27, MW-30, MW-31, TW4-21, TWN-1, TWN-3, TWN-4, TWN-7, and
TWN-18 as required by the CAP.
2.2 Sampling Methodology and Equipment and Decontamination Procedures
The QAP provides a detailed presentation of procedures utilized for groundwater sampling
activities under the GWDP (August 24, 2012).
The sampling methodology, equipment and decontamination procedures that were performed for
the nitrate contaminant investigation, as summarized below, are consistent with the QAP.
3
2.2.1 Well Purging, Sampling and Depth to Groundwater
A list of the wells in order of increasing nitrate contamination is generated quarterly. The order
for purging is thus established. The list is included with the Field Data Worksheets under Tab B.
Mill personnel start purging with all of the nondetect wells and then move to the wells with
detectable nitrate concentrations, progressing from the wells having the lowest nitrate
contamination to wells with the highest nitrate contamination.
Before leaving the Mill office, the pump and hose are decontaminated using the cleaning agents
described in Attachment 2-2 of the QAP. Rinsate blanks are collected at a frequency of one
rinsate per 20 field samples.
Purging is completed to remove stagnant water from the casing and to assure that representative
samples of formation water are collected for analysis. There are three purging strategies
specified in the QAP that are used to remove stagnant water from the casing during groundwater
sampling at the Mill. The three strategies are as follows:
1. Purging three well casing volumes with a single measurement of field parameters
2. Purging two casing volumes with stable field parameters (within 10% Relative Percent
Difference ["RPD"])
3. Purging a well to dryness and stability (within 10% RPD) of a limited list of field parameters
after recovery.
Mill personnel proceed to the first well, which is the well with the lowest concentration (i.e. non-
dectect) of nitrate based on the previous quarter's sampling results. Well depth measurements
are taken and the one casing volume is calculated. The purging strategy that will be used for the
well is determined at this time based on the depth to water measurement and the previous
production of the well. The Grundfos pump (a 6 to 10 gallon per minute [gpm] pump) is then
lowered to the appropriate depth in the well and purging is started. At the first well, the purge
rate is measured for the purging event by using a calibrated 5 gallon bucket. After the
evacuation of the well has been completed, the well is sampled when possible, and the pump is
removed from the well and the process is repeated at each well location moving from the least
contaminated to most contaminated well. If sample collection is not possible due to the well
being purged dry, a sample is collected after recovery using a disposable bailer and as described
in Attachment 2-3 of the QAP. Sample collection follows the procedures described in
Attachment 2-4 of the QAP.
After the samples have been collected for a particular well, the samples are placed into a cooler
that contains ice. The well is then recapped and Mill personnel proceed to the next well. If a
bailer has been used it is disposed of.
Decontamination of non-dedicated equipment, using the reagents in Attachment 2-2 of the QAP,
is performed between each sample location, and at the beginning of each sampling day, in
addition to the pre-event decontamination described above.
4
2.2.2 Piezometer Sampling
Samples are collected from Piezometers 1, 2 and 3, if possible. Samples are collected from
piezometers using a disposable bailer after one set of field measurements have been collected.
Due to the difficulty in obtaining samples from the piezometers, the purging protocols set out in
the QAP are not followed.
After samples are collected, the bailer is disposed of and samples are placed into a cooler
containing ice for sample preservation and transit to the Mill's contract analytical laboratory,
American West Analytical Laboratories ("AW AL").
2.3 Field Data
Attached under Tab B are copies of all Field Data Worksheets that were completed during the
quarter for the nitrate investigation monitoring wells and piezometers identified in Section 2.1.1
and Table 1.
2.4 Depth to Groundwater Data and Water Table Contour Map
Depth-to-groundwater measurements that were utilized for groundwater contours are included on
the Quarterly Depth to Water Sheet at Tab C of this Report along with the kriged groundwater
contour map for the current quarter generated from this data. All well levels used for
groundwater contour mapping were measured and recorded within 5 calendar days of each other
as indicated by the measurement dates in the summary sheet under Tab C. A copy of the kriged
groundwater contour map generated from the previous quarter's data is provided under Tab D.
2.5 Laboratory Results
2.5.1 Copy of Laboratory Results
The analytical results were provided by AW AL. Table 1 lists the dates when analytical results
were reported to the Quality Assurance ("QA") Manager for each well or other sample.
Analytical results for the samples collected for this quarter's nitrate investigation and a limited
list of chloroform investigation nitrate and chloride results are provided under Tab G of this
Report. Also included under Tab G are the results of analy for dDplicate . atnple and .rin~are
samples for this sampling effort, as identified in 'Table 1. See the Groundwater Monitoring
Report and Chloroform Monitoring Report for this quarter f r niu:ate and chloroform nalyticaJ
results for the groundwater monitoring wells and chloroform inve t.igaUori well nm li ted in
Table 1.
2.5.2 Regulatory Framework
As discussed in Section 1.0 above, the Request, Plan, and CA each triggered a series of actions
on EFRI' s part. Potential surficial sources of nitrate and chloride have been described in the
December 30, 2009 CIR and additional investigations into potential sources were completed and
discussed with DRC in 2011. Pursuant to the CA, the CAP was submitted to the Director of the
Division of Radiation Control (the "Director") on May 7, 2012. The CAP describes activities
5
associated with the nitrate in groundwater. The CAP was approved by the Director on December
12, 2012. This quarterly report documents the monitoring consistent with the program described
in the CAP.
3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCEANDDATA VALIDATION
EFRI's QA Manager performed a QA/Quality Control ("QC") review to confirm compliance of
the monitoring program with the requirements of the QAP. As required in the QAP, data QA
includes preparation and analysis of QC samples in the field, review of field procedures, an
analyte completeness review, and QC review of laboratory data methods and data. Identification
of field QC samples collected and analyzed is provided in Section 3 .1. Discussion of adherence
to Mill sampling Standard Operating Procedures ("SOPs") is provided in Section 3.2. Analytical
completeness review results are provided in Section 3.3. The steps and tests applied to check
field data QA/QC, holding times, receipt temperature and laboratory data QA/QC are discussed
in Sections 3.4.1 through 3.4.7 below.
The analytical laboratory has provided summary reports of the analytical QA/QC measurements
necessary to maintain conformance with National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation
Conference certification and reporting protocol. The Analytical Laboratory QA/QC Summary
Repmts, including copies of the Mill's Chain of Custody and Analytical Request Record forms
for each set of Analytical Results, follow the analytical results under Tab G. Results of the
review of the laboratory QA/QC information are provided under Tab H and discussed in Section
3.4, below.
3.1 Field QC Samples
The following QC samples were generated by Mill personnel and submitted to the analytical
laboratory in order to assess the quality of data resulting from the field sampling program.
Field QC samples for the nitrate investigation program consist of one field duplicate sample for
each 20 samples, DI Field Blanks ("DIFB"), and equipment rinsate samples.
During the quarter, one duplicate sample was collected as indicated in Table 1. The duplicate
was sent blind to the analytical laboratory and analyzed for the same parameters as the nitrate
wells.
One rinsate blank sample was collected as indicated on Table 1. Rinsate samples are labeled
with the name of the subsequently purged well with a terminal letter "R" added (e.g. TWN-7R).
The field QC sample results are included with the routine analyses under Tab G.
3.2 Adherence to Mill Sampling SOPs
The QA Manager review of Mill Personnel's adherence to the existing SOPs, confirmed that the
QAIQC requirements established in the QAP and Chloroform QAP were met.
6
3.3 Analyte Completeness Review
All analyses required by the GWDP for nitrate monitoring for the period were performed.
3.4 Data Validation
The QAP and GWDP (August 24, 2012) identify the data validation steps and data QC checks
required for the nitrate monitoring program. Consistent with these requirements, the QA
Manager performed the following evaluations: a field data QA/QC evaluation, a holding time
evaluation, an analytical method check, a reporting limit evaluation, a QC evaluation of sample
duplicates, a QC evaluation of control limits for analysis and blanks, a receipt temperature
evaluation, and a rinsate evaluation. Because no VOCs are analyzed for the nitrate
contamination investigation, no trip blanks are required in the sampling program. Each
evaluation is discussed in the following sections. Data check tables indicating the results of each
test are provided under Tab H.
3.4.1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation
The QA Manager performs a review of all field recorded parameters to assess their adherence
with QAP requirements. The assessment involved review of two sources of information: the
Field Data Sheets and the Quarterly Depth to Water summary sheet. Review of the Field Data
Sheets addresses well purging volumes and stability of five parameters: conductance, pH,
temperature, redox potential, and turbidity. Review of the Depth to Water data confirms that all
depth measurements used for development of groundwater contour maps were conducted within
a five-day period of each other. The results of this quarter's review are provided under Tab H.
Based upon the review of the field data sheets, field work conformed with the QAP purging and
field measurement requirements. A summary of the purging techniques employed and field
measurements taken is described below:
Purging Two Ca i.ng Volumes wllh Stable Field Parameter (within 10% RPD)
Wells TWN-01, TWN-04, and TWN-18 were sampled after two casing volumes were removed.
Field parameters pH, specific conductivity, turbidity, water temperature, and redox potential
were measured during purging. All field parameters for this requirement were stable within 10%
RPD.
Purging a WeJJ to Dryne sand Stability of a Limited Li t of Field Parameter
Wells TWN-03 and TWN-07 were purged to dryness before two casing volumes were evacuated.
After well recovery, one set of measurements for the field parameters of pH, specific
conductivity, and water temperature only were taken; the samples were collected, and another set
of measurements for pH, specific conductivity, and water temperature were taken. Stabilization
of pH, conductivity and temperature are required within 10% RPD under the QAP. All field
parameters for this requirement were stable within 10% RPD.
Continuously Pumped Wells
Wells TWN-02, TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-25 are continuously pumped wells. These wells are
pumped on a set schedule per the remediation plan and are considered sufficiently evacuated to
7
immediately collect a sample. As previously noted, TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-25 are
chloroform investigation wells and are sampled under the chloroform program. Data for nitrate
and chloride are provided here for completeness purposes.
During review of the field data sheets, it was observed that sampling personnel consistently
recorded depth to water to the nearest 0.01 foot.
All field parameters for all wells were within the QAP required limits, as indicated below.
The review of the field sheets for compliance with QAP requirements resulted in the
observations noted below. The QAP requirements in Attachment 2-3 specifically state that field
parameters must be stabilized to within 10% over at least 2 consecutive measurements for wells
purged to two casing volumes or to dryness. The QAP Attachment 2-3 states that turbidity
should be less than 5 NTU prior to sampling unless the well is characterized by water that has a
higher turbidity. The QAP Attachment 2-3 does not require that turbidity measurements be less
than 5 NTU prior to sampling. As such the noted observations regarding turbidity measurements
greater than 5 NTU below are included for information purposes only.
• Four well measurements exceeded the QAP' s 5 NTU turbidity goal as noted in Tab H.
All required turbidity RPD's met the QAP Requirement to stabilize within 10%.
EFRI's letter to DRC of March 26, 2010 discusses further why turbidity does not appear to be an
appropriate parameter for assessing well stabilization. In response to DRC's subsequent
correspondence dated June 1, 2010 and June 24, 2010, EFRI completed a monitoring well
redevelopment program. The redevelopment report was submitted to DRC on September 30,
2011. DRC responded to the redevelopment report via letter on November 15, 2012. Per the
DRC letter dated November 15, 2012, the field data generated this quarter are compliant with the
turbidity requirements of the approved QAP.
3.4.2 Holding Time Evaluation
QAP Table 1 identifies the method holding times for each suite of parameters. Sample holding
time checks are provided in Tab H. All samples were received and analyzed within the required
holding time.
3.4.3 Analytical Method Checklist
All analytical methods reported by the laboratory were checked against the required methods
enumerated in the QAP. Analytical method checks are provided in Tab H. All methods were
consistent with the requirements of the QAP.
3.4.4 Reporting Limit Evaluation
All analytical method reporting limits ("RLs") reported by the laboratory were checked against
the reporting limits enumerated in the QAP. Reporting Limit Checks are provided in Tab H. All
analytes were measured and reported to the required reporting limits, with the exception of
several samples that had increased reporting limits due to matrix interference or required dilution
due to the sample concentration. However, in all of those cases the analytical results were
8
greater than the reporting limit used.
3.4.5 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
Section 9 .1.4 a) of the QAP states that RPDs will be calculated for the comparison of duplicate
and original field samples. The QAP acceptance limits for RPDs between the duplicate and
original field sample is less than or equal to 20% unless the measured results are less than 5
times the required detection limit. This standard is based on the EPA Contract Laboratory
Program National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review, February 1994, 9240.1-05-
01 as cited in the QAP. The RPDs are calculated for duplicate pairs for all analytes regardless of
whether or not the reported concentrations are greater than 5 times the required detection limits.
However, data will be considered noncompliant only when the results are greater than 5 times
the required detection limit and the RPD is greater than 20%.
The duplicate results were within a 20% RPD. Results of the RPD test are provided in Tab H.
3.4.6 Other Laboratory QA/QC
Section 9.2 of the QAP requires that the laboratory's QNQC Manager check the following items
in developing data reports: (1) sample preparation information is correct and complete, (2)
analysis information is correct and complete, (3) appropriate Analytical Laboratory procedures
are followed, (4) analytical results are conect and complete, (5) QC samples are within
established control limits, (6) blanks are within QC limits, (7) special sample preparation and
analytical requirements have been met, and (8) documentation is complete. In addition to other
laboratory checks described above, EFRI' s QA Manager rechecks QC samples and blanks (items
(5) and (6)) to confirm that the percent recovery for spikes and the relative percent difference for
spike duplicates are within the method-specific required limits, or that the case narrative
sufficiently explains any deviation from these limits. Results of this quantitative check are
provided in Tab H.
The lab QNQC results met these specified acceptance limits.
The QAP Section 8.1.2 requires that a Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate ("MS/MSD") pair
be analyzed with each analytical batch. The QAP does not specify acceptance limits for the
MS/MSD pair, and the QAP does not specify that the MS/MSD pair be prepared on EFRI
samples only. Acceptance limits for MS/MSDs are set by the laboratories. The review of the
information provided by the laboratories in the data packages verified that the QAP requirement
to analyze an MS/MSD pair with each analytical batch was met. While the QAP does not require
it, the recoveries were reviewed for compliance with the laboratory established acceptance limits.
The QAP does not require this level of review, and the results of this review are provided for
information only.
The information from the Laboratory QNQC Summary Reports indicates that the MS/MSDs
recoveries and the associated RPDs for the samples were within acceptable laboratory limits for
the regulated compounds except as indicated in Tab H. The two data recoveries that are outside
the laboratory established acceptance limits do not affect the quality or usability of the data
because the recoveries are above the acceptance limits and are indicative of matrix interference.
Matrix interferences are applicable to the individual sample results only. The requirement in the
9
QAP to analyze a MS/MSD pair with each analytical batch was met and as such the data are
compliant with the QAP.
The information from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports indicates that the Laboratory
Control Sample recoveries were acceptable, which indicate that the analytical system was
operating properly.
The QAP Section 8.1.2 requires that each analytical batch shall be accompanied by a reagent
blank. All analytical batches routinely contain a blank, which is a laboratory-grade water blank
sample made and carried through all analytical steps. For the Mill samples, a method blank is
prepared for all analytical methods. The information from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary
Reports indicates that the method blanks did not contain detections of any target analytes above
the Reporting Limit.
3.4.7 Receipt Temperature Evaluation
Chain of Custody sheets were reviewed to confirm compliance with the QAP requirement in
QAP Table 1 that samples be received at 6°C or lower. Sample temperatures checks are
provided in Tab H. All samples were received within the required temperature limit.
3.4.8 Rinsate Check
Rinsate checks are provided in Tab H. A comparison of the rinsate blank sample concentration
levels to the QAP requirements -that rinsate sample concentrations be one order of magnitude
lower than that of the actual well -indicated that all of the rinsate blank analytes met this
criterion. Al rinsate and DIFB blank samples were non-detect for the qumter.
4.0 INTERPRETATION OF DATA
4.1 Interpretation of Groundwater Levels, Gradients and Flow Directions.
4.1.1 Current Site Groundwater Contour Map
As stated above, a listing of groundwater level readings for the current quarter (shown as depth
to groundwater in feet) is included under Tab C. The data from this tab has been interpreted
(interpolated by kriging) and plotted in a water table contour map, provided under the same tab.
The contour map is based on the current quarter's data for all wells.
The water level contour map indicates that perched water flow ranges from generally
southwesterly beneath the Mill site and tailings cells to generally southerly along the eastern and
western margins of White Mesa. Perched water mounding associated with the wildlife ponds
locally changes the generally southerly perched water flow patterns. For example, northeast of
the Mill site, mounding associated with wildlife ponds results in locally northerly flow near
PIEZ-1. The impact of the mounding associated with the northern ponds, to which water has not
been delivered since March 2012, is diminishing and is expected to continue to diminish as the
mound decays due to reduced recharge.
10
Not only has recharge from the wildlife ponds impacted perched water elevations and flow
directions at the site, but the cessation of water delivery to the northern ponds, which are
generally upgradient of the nitrate and chloroform plumes at the site, has resulted in changing
conditions that are expected to impact constituent concentrations and migration rates within the
plumes. Specifically, past recharge from the ponds has helped limit many constituent
concentrations within the plumes by dilution while the associated groundwater mounding has
increased hydraulic gradients and contributed to plume migration. Since use of the northern
wildlife ponds ceased in March 2012, the reduction in recharge and decay of the associated
groundwater mound are expected to increase many constituent concentrations within the plumes
while reducing hydraulic gradients and acting to reduce rates of plume migration. EFRI and its
consultants have raised the issues and potential effects associated with cessation of water
delivery to the northern wildlife ponds during discussions with DRC in March 2012 and May
2013.
The impacts associated with cessation of water delivery to the nOtthern ponds are expected to
propagate downgradient (south and southwest) over time. Wells close to the ponds are generally
expected to be impacted sooner than wells farther downgradient of the ponds. Therefore,
constituent concentrations are generally expected to increase in downgradient wells close to the
ponds before increases are detected in wells farther downgradient of the ponds. Although such
increases are anticipated to result from reduced dilution, the magnitude and timing of the
increases are difficult to predict due to the complex permeability distribution at the site and
factors such as pumping and the rate of decay of the groundwater mound. The potential exists for
some wells completed in higher permeability materials to be impacted sooner than some wells
completed in lower permeability materials even though the wells completed in lower
permeability materials may be closer to the ponds.
Localized increases in concentrations of constituents such as nitrate and chloride within and near
the nitrate plume may occur even when the nitrate plume is under control based on the Nitrate
CAP requirements. Ongoing mechanisms that can be expected to increase the concentrations of
nitrate and chloride locally as a result of reduced wildlife pond recharge include but are not
limited to:
1) Reduced dilution -the nuxmg of low constituent concentration pond recharge into
existing perched groundwater will be reduced over time.
2) Reduced saturated thicknesses -dewatering of higher permeability zones receiVmg
primarily low constituent concentration pond water will result in wells intercepting the
zones receiving a smaller proportion of the low constituent concentration water.
The combined impact of the above two mechanisms may be especially evident at chloroform
pumping wells MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19, and TW4-20; nitrate pumping wells TW4-22,
TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2; and non-pumped wells adjacent to the pumped wells. The
overall impact is expected to be generally higher constituent concentrations in these wells over
the short term until mass reduction resulting from pumping and natural attenuation eventually
reduce concentrations.
In addition to changes in the flow regime caused by reduced wildlife pond recharge, perched
flow directions are locally influenced by operation of the chloroform and nitrate pumping wells.
11
As shown in the detail water level map provided under Tab C, well defined cones of depression
are evident in the vicinity of all chloroform pumping wells except TW 4-4, which began pumping
in the first quarter of 2010. Although operation of chloroform pumping well TW4-4 has
depressed the water table in the vicinity of TW4-4, a well-defined cone of depression is not
clearly evident. The lack of a well-defined cone of depression near TW4-4likely results from 1)
variable permeability conditions in the vicinity of TW4-4, and 2) persistent relatively low water
levels at adjacent well TW4-14.
Pumping of nitrate wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 began during the first quarter
of 2013. Water level patterns near these wells are expected to be influenced by the presence of
and the decay of the groundwater mound associated with the northern wildlife ponds, and by the
persistently low water level elevation at TWN-7, which is located up gradient of the nitrate
pumping wells
During the previous quarter, a large decrease in the reported water level at nitrate pumping well
TW4-25 resulted in an apparently large cone of depression near that well. The large decrease in
water level at TW4-25 combined with decreases at nitrate pumping wells TW4-22 and TW4-24,
and adjacent chloroform pumping wells TW4-19 and TW4-20, resulted in an apparently large
increase in the combined influence of the nitrate and chloroform pumping systems. During the
current quarter, owing primarily to an increase in reported water level at TW4-25, the apparent
capture of the nitrate pumping system, and the apparent combined capture of both nitrate and
chloroform pumping systems (provided under Tab C) has decreased compared to last quarter.
Decreases in water levels at nitrate pumping wells TW4-22 and TW4-24 indicate that the capture
associated with nitrate pumping wells is developing and is expected to increase over time as
water levels decline due to pumping and to cessation of water delivery to the northern wildlife
ponds. The long term interaction between nitrate and chloroform pumping systems will,
however, require more data to be collected as part of routine monitoring.
As discussed above, variable permeability conditions are one likely reason for the lack of a well-
defined cone of depression near chloroform pumping well TW4-4. Changes in water levels at
wells immediately south of TW 4-4 resulting from TW 4-4 pumping are expected to be muted
because TW4-4 is located at a transition from relatively high to relatively low permeability
conditions south (downgradient) of TW4-4. The permeability of the perched zone at TW4-6 and
TW4-26, and recently installed wells TW4-29, TW4-30, TW4-31, TW4-33, and TW4-34, is one
to two orders of magnitude lower than at TW4-4. Any drawdown of water levels at wells
immediately south of TW 4-4 resulting from TW 4-4 pumping is also difficult to determine
because of the general, long-term increase in water levels in this area due to recharge from the
wildlife ponds.
Water levels at TW4-4 and TW4-6 increased by nearly 2.7 and 2.9 feet, respectively, between
the fourth quarter of 2007 and the fourth quarter of 2009 (just prior to the start of TW 4-4
pumping) at rates of approximately 1.2 feet/year and 1.3 feet/year, respectively. However, the
increase in water level at TW 4-6 has been reduced since the start of pumping at TW 4-4 (first
quarter of 2010) to approximately 0.5 feet/year suggesting that TW4-6 is within the hydraulic
influence of TW4-4 (note: hydrographs for these wells are provided in the quarterly Chloroform
Monitoring Report). Water level elevations at these wells are eventually expected to be
influenced by cessation of water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds as discussed above.
12
Recharge from the southern wildlife pond is expected to continue to have an effect on water
levels near TW 4-4, but the effects related to recharge from the northern ponds is expected to
diminish over time as water is no longer delivered to the northern ponds.
The lack of a well-defined cone of depression at TW 4-4 is also influenced by the persistent,
relatively low water level at non-pumping well TW4-14, located east ofTW4-4 and TW4-6. For
the current quarter, the water level at TW4-14 (approximately 5528.8 feet above mean sea level
["ft amsl"]) is approximately 11 feet lower than the water level at TW4-6 (approximately 5539.7
ft amsl) and 15 feet lower than at TW4-4 (approximately 5544.1 ft amsl) even though TW4-4 is
pumping.
Well TW4-27 (installed south of TW4-14 in the fourth quarter of 2011) has a static water level
of approximately 5527.6 ft amsl, similar to TW4-14 (approximately 5528.8 ft amsl). Prior to the
installation of TW4-27, the persistently low water level at TW4-14 was considered anomalous
because it appeared to be downgradient of all three wells TW4-4, TW4-6, and TW4-26, yet
chloroform was not detected at TW4-14. Chloroform had apparently migrated from TW4-4 to
TW4-6 and from TW4-6 to TW4-26 which suggested that TW4-26 was actually downgradient of
TW4-6, and TW4-6 was actually downgradient of TW4-4, regardless of the flow direction
implied by the low water level at TW4-14. The water level at TW4-26 (5538.5 feet amsl) is,
however, lower than water levels at adjacent wells TW4-6 (5539.7 feet amsl), and TW4-23
(5542.4 feet amsl), as shown in the detail water level map under Tab C.
Hydraulic tests indicate that the permeability at TW4-27 is an order of magnitude lower than at
TW4-6 and three orders of magnitude lower than at TW4-4 (see Hydro Geo Chern, Inc. [HGC],
September 20, 2010: Hydraulic Testing of TW4-4, TW4-6, and TW4-26, White Mesa Uranium
Mill, July 2010; and HGC, November 28, 2011: Installation, Hydraulic Testing, and Perched
Zone Hydrogeology of Perched Monitoring Well TW4-27, White Mesa Uranium Mill Near
Blanding, Utah). The similar water levels at TW4-14 and TW4-27, and the low permeability
estimate at TW4-27 suggest that both wells are completed in materials having lower permeability
than nearby wells. The low permeability condition likely reduces the rate of long-term water
level increase at TW4-14 and TW4-27 compared to nearby wells, yielding water levels that
appear anomalously low. This behavior is consistent with hydraulic test data collected from
recently installed wells TW4-29, TW4-30, TW4-31, TW4-33 and TW4-34 which indicate that
the permeability of these wells is one to two orders of magnitude higher than the permeability of
TW4-27 (see HGC, January 23, 2014; Contamination Investigation Report, TW4-12 and TW4-
27 Areas, White Mesa Uranium Mill Near Blanding, Utah).
4.1.2 Comparison of Current Groundwater Contour Map to Groundwater Contour Map
for Previous Quarter
The groundwater contour maps for the Mill site for the previous qumter, as submitted with the
Nitrate Monitoring Report for the previous quarter, are attached under Tab D.
A comparison of the water table contour maps for the cunent (first quarter of 2014) to the water
table contour maps for the previous quarter (fourth quarter of 2013) indicates slightly less
drawdown related to operation of chloroform pumping wells TW4-19 and TW4-20 and
substantially less drawdown associated with nitrate pumping well TW4-25. Nitrate pumping
13
wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 were brought into operation during the first
quarter of 2013 and their impact on water level patterns was not clearly evident until the previous
quarter. During the previous quarter (as will be discussed below and in Section 4.2.1 ), a large
decrease in water level at nitrate pumping well TW4-25 resulted in an apparently large cone of
depression near that well. The large decrease in water level at TW4-25 combined with decreases
at nitrate pumping wells TW4-22 and TW4-24, and adjacent chloroform pumping wells TW4-19
and TW4-20, resulted in apparently large cones of depression associated with these wells.
During the current quarter, owing primarily to an increase in reported water level at TW4-25, the
apparent capture of the nitrate pumping system, and the apparent combined capture of both
nitrate and chloroform pumping systems (provided under Tab C) has decreased compared to last
quarter. Except for a few locations, water levels and water level contours for the site have not
changed significantly since the last quarter. As discussed in Section 4.1.1, pumping at
chloroform well TW4-4, which began in the first quarter of 2010, has depressed the water table
near TW4-4, but a well-defined cone of depression is not clearly evident, likely due to variable
permeability conditions near TW4-4 and the persistently low water level at adjacent well TW4-
14.
Reported decreases in water levels (increases in drawdown) of 2.6 feet and 4.5 feet occurred in
chloroform pumping well MW-26 and nitrate pumping well TW4-24, respectively. Furthermore,
increases of 2.7 feet, 3.1 feet and 23.8 feet occurred in chloroform pumping well TW4-20 and
nitrate pumping wells TWN-2 and TW4-25, respectively. Changes in water levels at other
pumping wells (chloroform pumping wells MW-4, TW4-4 and TW4-19, and nitrate pumping
well TWN-22) were less than 2 feet. Water level fluctuations at pumping wells typically occur in
part because of fluctuations in pumping conditions just prior to and at the time the measurements
are taken.
The decreases in water levels (increases in drawdown) at chloroform pumping wells MW-26 and
nitrate pumping well TW4-24 have increased the apparent capture of these wells relative to other
pumping wells. The apparently large cone of depression associated with nitrate pumping well
TW4-25 has decreased as a result of the 23.8 foot water level increase since the previous quarter.
Furthermore, the apparent capture associated with chloroform pumping well TW 4-20 has
decreased slightly since the previous quarter, due to a water level increase (decrease in
drawdown) of approximately 2.7 feet.
Reported water level decreases of 0.11 and 0.2 feet at Piezometers 2 and 3 likely result from
cessation of water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds as discussed in Section 4.1.1 and the
consequent continuing decay of the associated perched water mound. The reported water level
decreases of 1.5 feet and 2.1 feet at Piezometers 4 and 5 may result from reduced recharge at the
southern wildlife pond.
Reported water level increases of 4.8 feet at MW-3, of 3.2 feet at MW-20 and of 4.1 feet at MW-
23 between the previous quarter and the current quarter bring these wells back to more typical
status. Decreases at these wells last quarter were likely the result of purging and sampling prior
to measuring water levels. Because these wells have relatively low permeability, there was
likely insufficient time for water levels to have fully recovered from purging prior to water level
measurement during the previous quarter.
14
4.1.3 Hydrographs
Attached under Tab E are hydrographs showing groundwater elevation in each nitrate
contaminant investigation monitor well over time. Per the CAP, nitrate wells TWN-6, TWN-14,
TWN-16, and TWN-19 have been maintained for depth to groundwater monitoring only. These
hydrographs are also included in Tab E.
As noted in Section 2.1.1 , nitrate wells TWN-05, TWN-08, TWN-09, TWN-10, TWN-11, TWN-
12, TWN-13, TWN-15, and TWN-17 were abandoned in accordance with the DRC-approved
Well Abandonment Procedure on July 31, 2013. The historic hydrographs will not be included
in future quarterly reports unless requested by DRC.
4.1.4 Depth to Groundwater Measured and Groundwater Elevation
Attached in Tab F are tables showing depth to groundwater measured and groundwater elevation
over time for each of the wells listed in Section 2.1.1 above.
As noted in Section 2.1.1, nitrate wells TWN-05, TWN-08, TWN-09, TWN-10, TWN-11, TWN-
12, TWN-13, TWN-15, and TWN-17 were abandoned in accordance with the DRC-approved
Well Abandonment Procedure on July 31, 2013. The historic measured depth to groundwater
and groundwater elevation data will not be included in future quarterly reports unless requested
byDRC.
4.2 Effectiveness of Hydraulic Containment and Capture
4.2.1 Hydraulic Containment and Control
The CAP states that hydraulic containment and control will be evaluated in part based on water
level data and in part on concentrations in wells downgradient of pumping wells TW 4-22 and
TW4-24.
As per the CAP, the previous quarter was the first quarter that hydraulic capture associated with
nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 was evaluated. Hydraulic
containment and control based on water level data is considered successful per the CAP if the
entire nitrate plume upgradient of TW4-22 and TW4-24 falls within the combined capture of the
nitrate pumping wells. Capture zones based on water level contours calculated by kriging the
current quarter's water level data are provided on water level contour maps included under Tab
C. The nitrate capture zones are defined by the bounding stream tubes associated with nitrate
pumping wells. Each bounding stream tube represents a flow line parallel to the hydraulic
gradient and therefore perpendicular to the intersected water level contours. Assuming that the
stream tubes do not change over time, all flow between the bounding stream tubes associated
with a particular pumping well is presumed to eventually reach and be removed by that well.
Capture associated with chloroform pumping wells is also included on these maps because the
influence of the chloroform and nitrate pumping systems overlap.
The specific methodology for calculating the nitrate capture zones is substantially the same as
that used since the fourth quarter of 2005 to calculate the capture zones for the chloroform
15
program, as agreed to by the DRC and International Uranium (USA) Corp. The procedure for
calculating nitrate capture zones is as follows:
1) Calculate water level contours by gridding the water level data on approximately 50-foot
centers using the ordinary linear kriging method in Surfer™. Default kriging parameters
are used that include a linear variogram, an isotropic data search, and all the available
water level data for the quarter, including relevant seep and spring elevations.
2) Calculate the capture zones by hand from the kriged water level contours following the
rules for flow nets:
-from each pumping well, reverse track the stream tubes that bound the capture zone of
each well,
-maintain perpedicularity between each stream tube and the kriged water level contours.
During the previous quarter, decreases in water levels at nitrate pumping wells TW4-22 and
TW4-24, and adjacent chloroform pumping wells TW4-19 and TW4-20, combined with the large
water level decrease at nitrate pumping well TW4-25, created apparently significant cones of
depression and detectable capture associated with many of the nitrate pumping wells, in
particular TW4-25. The apparent cone of depression at TW4-25 expanded the apparent capture
of the chloroform pumping system to the west. The resulting combined capture of both systems
appeared to encompass nearly half of the nitrate plume upgradient ofTW4-22 and TW4-24.
During the current quarter, owing primarily to an increase in reported water level at TW4-25, the
apparent capture of the nitrate pumping system, and the apparent combined capture of both
nitrate and chloroform pumping systems (provided under Tab C) has decreased compared to last
quarter. Decreases in water levels at nitrate pumping wells TW4-22 and TW4-24 indicate that
the capture associated with nitrate pumping wells continues to develop. The capture associated
with nitrate pumping wells is expected to increase over time as water levels continue to decline
due to pumping and to cessation of water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds. Slow
development of hydraulic capture is consistent with and expected based on the relatively low
permeability of the perched zone at the site. Furthermore, the presence of the perched
groundwater mound, and the apparently anomalously low water level at TWN-7, will influence
the definition of capture associated with the nitrate pumping system.
That pumping is likely sufficient to eventually capture the entire plume upgradient of TW4-22
and TW4-24 can be demonstrated by comparing the combined average pumping rates of all
nitrate pumping wells for the current quarter to estimates of pre-pumping flow through the nitrate
plume near the locations of TW4-22 and TW4-24. The pre-pumping flow calculation is assumed
to represent a steady state 'background' condition that includes constant recharge, hydraulic
gradients, and saturated thicknesses. Changes after pumping are assumed to result only from
pumping. As will be discussed below, the average combined nitrate pumping rate for the quarter
exceeds the calculated pre-pumping rate of perched water flow through the nitrate plume by a
factor between approximately 1.2 and 2.5.
The cumulative volume of water removed by TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 during
the current quarter was approximately 431,896 gallons. This equates to an average total
extraction rate of approximately 3.3 gpm over the 90 day quarter. This average accounts for time
periods when pumps were off due to insufficient water columns in the wells.
16
Pre-pumping flow through th nit.ra e pluine n ar T W4-22 and TW4-24 was e. ti mated Lt. ing
Darcy's Law to lie within a range of approximat ly 1.31 gpm to 2.79 gpm. Cal ul ation. were
based on an average hydraulic conductivity range of 0.15 feet per day (ftld ay) to 0.32 ft/d ay
(depending on the calculation method), a pr~pumping hydraulic gradient of 0.025 fee l p r f o L
(ft/ft), a plume width of 1,200 feet, and a satura1ed thickne (al TW4-22 and TW4-24) of 56
feet. The hydraulic conductivity range wa: e Limated by averaging the results obtained from slug
test data that were collected automatically by data loggers from wells within the plume and
analyzed using the KGS unconfined slug test solllti n available in Aqtesolve™ (see Hydro Geo
Chern, Inc. [HGC], August 3, 2005: Perched Monitoring Well Installation and Testing at the
White Mesa Uranium Mill, April Through June 2005; HGC, March 10, 2009: Perched Nitrate
Monitoring Well Installation and Hydraulic Testing, White Mesa Uranium Mill; and HGC,
March 17 2009: Letter Report to David Frydenlund, Esq, regarding installation and testing of
TW4-23, TW4-24, and TW4-25) These results are summarized in Table 6. Data from fourth
quarter 2012 were used to estimate the pre-pumping hydraulic gradient and saturated thickness.
These data are also summarized in Tables 7 and 8.
The average hydraulic conductivity was estimated to lie within a range of 0.15 ft/day to 0.32
ft/day. Averages were calculated four way . A hown in Table 6 arithm tic and .geomelri
averages for wells MW-30, MW-31 , TW4-22, TW4-24 TW4-_5 TWN-2, and TWN -~ were
calculated as 0.22 and 0.15 ft/day, respectively. Arilhm Lie and geometri averages for a ub ·et
of these wells (MW-30, MW-31, TW4-22, and TW4~24) were calculated a 0.32 and 0.31 ft /day,
respectively. The lowest value, 0.15 ft/day, repre enled the geomen:ic average of the hydraulic
conductivity estimates for all the plume wells. The highest value 0.32 ft/day, represented the
arithmetic average for the four plume wells ha ing the blghe t hydraulic conductivity estimates
(MW-30, MW-31, TW4-22, and TW4-24).
Pie-pumping hydt:auli gradients were estimated · t two locations· between TW4-25 and MW-31
(e. timated a 0.023 fr/ft , and between TWN-2 and MW-3 (~timared a 0.027 ft/ft). These
re ult were averaged to yield the value u ed in the cal ul ation (0.025 ft/ft). The pre-pumping
saturated thickness of 56 feet was an average of pre-pumping aturated thickness s at TW4-22
and TW4-24.
The hydraulic gradient and saturated thickness used in the calculations are assumed to represent
a steady state 'background' condition. However, assumption of a steady state 'background' is
inconsistent with the cessation of water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds, located
upgradient of the nitrate plume. Hydraulic gradients and . allli~tted. lhlcknes, within the plume
are declining as a result of two factors: reduced recharge rr m the pone{ , and the effects of
nitrate pumping. Separating the impact f nitrate purnpjng from the impa · ts of reduced recharge
from the pond. i ·problematic. Should pumping ea e and 'background c ndilion be allowed to
re~e tabl i ·h, however smaller bydrauJic gradi ents an.d aturated thicknesses would be expected
due to reduced recharge, which would lower estimate of background' flow.
As a result, the 'background' flow calculated using the hydraulic gradient of 0.025 ft/ft and
saturated thickness of 56 feet is considered conservatively large. Furthermore, using the
arithmetic average hydraulic conductivity of a subset of plume wells having the highest
conductivities is considered less representative of actual conditions than using the geometric
17
average conductivity of all of the plume wells. Nitrate pumping may therefore exceed flow
through the plume by a factor greater than 2.5, the high end of the calculated range.
The CAP states that MW-5, MW-11, MW-30, and MW-31 are located downgradient ofTW4-22
and TW4-24. MW-30 and MW-31 are within the plume near its downgradient edge and MW-5
and MW -11 are outside and downgradient of the plume. Per the CAP, hydraulic control based on
concentration data will be considered successful if the concentrations of nitrate in MW -30 and
MW-31 remain stable or decline, and concentrations of nitrate in downgradient wells MW-5 and
MW -11 do not exceed the 10 mg/L standard.
Table 5 presents the nitrate concentration data for MW-30, MW-31 , MW-5 and MW-11, which
are down-gradient of pumping wells TW4-22 and TW4-24. Based on these concentration data,
the nitrate plume is under control.
The plume has not migrated downgradient to MW -5 or MW -11 because nitrate was not detected
at MW -11 . Between the previous and current quarters, nitrate concentrations decreased slight! y
in both MW-30 and MW-31. Nitrate in MW-30 decreased from 19.5 mg/L to 18.4 mg/L and
nitrate in MW-31 decreased from 23.9 mg/L to 20.6 mg/L. Changes in both wells were less than
20% suggesting the changes are within the range typical for sampling and analytical error.
Although short -term fluctuations have occurred, nitrate concentrations in MW-30 and MW-31
have been relatively stable, demonstrating that plume migration is minimal or absent.
Chloride has been relatively stable at MW-30 but appears to be increasing at MW-31 (see Tab J
and Tab K, discussed in Section 4.2.4 ). The apparent increase in chloride and stable nitrate at
MW -31 suggests a natural attenuation process that is affecting nitrate but not chloride. A likely
process that would degrade nitrate but leave chloride unaffected is reduction of nitrate by pyrite.
The likelihood of this process in the perched zone is discussed in HGC, December 7 2012;
Investigation of Pyrite in the Perched Zone, White Mesa Uranium Mill Site, Blanding, Utah.
4.2.2 Current Nitrate and Chloride Isoconcentration Maps
Included under Tab I of this Report are current nitrate and chloride iso-concentration maps for
the Mill site. Nitrate iso-contours start at 5 mg!L and chloride iso-contours start at 100 mg/L
because those values appear to separate the plumes from background. All nitrate and chloride
data used to develop these iso-concentration maps are from the current quarter's sampling
events.
4.2.3 Comparison of Areal Extent
Changes in nitrate concentration at wells within the nitrate plume since the last quarter have
resulted in an overall shrinkage of the plume area. The northeastern extent of the plume has been
reduced, with the plume boundary moving to the west away from TW4-19, TW4-20, and TW4-
25, primarily due to decreases in concentrations at these wells and TWN-2. Concentrations at
chloroform pumping wells TW4-19 and TW4-20 decreased from approximately 4.7 mg/L and
9.6 mg/L, respectively, to 1.6 and 7.6 mg/L. The concentration at nitrate pumping well TWN-2
decreased substantially from approximately 111 mg/L to 42.6 mg/L.
18
The nitrate concentration at TW 4-18 which had been increasing for several quarters, decreased
from 14.2 mg!L to 12.8 mg/L suggesting stabilization. However, most of the wells in the
vicinity of TW 4-18 (and downgradient of the northern wildlife ponds) showed slight increases in
nitrate concentrations. Changes in this area are expected to result from changes in pumping and
from the cessation of water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds. The reduction in low-nitrate
recharge from the ponds appears to be having the anticipated effect of generally increased nitrate
concentrations in wells downgradient of the ponds (see Tab J and Tab K, discussed in Section
4.2.4 ), which is the expected consequence of reduced dilution as discussed in Section 4.1.1.
Although such increases in concentration have been anticipated as the result of reduced dilution,
the magnitude and timing of the increases are difficult to predict due to the measured variations
in hydraulic conductivity at the site and other factors. Nitrate in the area directly downgradient
(south to south-southwest) of the northern wildlife ponds is associated with the chloroform
plume, is cross-gradient of the nitrate plume as defined in the CAP, and is within the capture
zone of the chloroform pumping system (primarily chloroform pumping well MW-26). Perched
water flow in the area is to the southwest in the same approximate direction as the main body of
the nitrate plume.
Nitrate concentrations at the downgradient edge of the plume (MW-30 and MW-31) continue to
be relatively stable, demonstrating that plume migration is minimal or absent. With regard to
chloroform, the boundary of the northern portion of the chloroform plume has migrated to the
west toward nitrate pumping well TW4-24 since pumping began. More details regarding the
chloroform data and interpretation are included in the Quarterly Chloroform Monitoring Report
submitted under separate cover.
4.2.4 Nitrate and Chloride Concentration Trend Data and Graphs
Attached under Tab J is a table summarizing values for nitrate and chloride for each well over
time.
Attached under Tab K are graphs showing nitrate and chloride concentration plots in each
monitor well over time.
As noted in Section 2.1.1, nitrate wells TWN -05, TWN -08, TWN -09, TWN -10, TWN -11, TWN-
12, TWN-13, TWN-15, and TWN-17 were abandoned in accordance with the DRC-approved
Well Abandonment Procedure on July 31, 2013. The historic trend data will not be included in
future quarterly reports unless requested by DRC.
4.2.5 Interpretation of Analytical Data
Comparing the nitrate analytical results to those of the previous quarter, as summarized in the
tables included under Tab J, the following observations can be made for wells within and
immediately surrounding the nitrate plume:
a) Nitrate concentrations have increased by more than 20% in the following wells
compared to last quarter: MW-26, TW4-16, TW4-21, and TW4-22;
b) Nitrate concentrations have decreased by more than 20% in the following wells
compared to last quarter: TW4-19, TW4-20, TW4-25, and TWN-2;
19
c) Nitrate concentrations have remained within 20% in the following wells compared to
last quarter: MW-27, MW-30, MW-31, TW4-5, TW4-10, TW4-18, TW4-24, TWN-1,
TWN-3, TWN-4, TWN-7, and TWN-18; and
d) MW -11, MW -25, and MW-32 remained non-detect.
As indicated, nitrate concentrations for many of the wells with detected nitrate were within 20%
of the values reported for the wells during the previous quarter, suggesting that variations are
within the range typical for sampling and analytical error. The remaining wells had changes in
concentration greater than 20%. The latter includes chloroform pumping wells MW-26, TW4-19
and TW4-20 and nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-25 and TWN-2. TW4-21 is located
adjacent to chloroform pumping well TW4-19 and nitrate pumping well TW4-25; TW4-16 is
located adjacent to chloroform pumping well MW -26. Fluctuations in concentrations at pumping
wells and wells adjacent to pumping wells likely result in part from the effects of pumping as
discussed in Section 4.1.1.
The nitrate concentration in nitrate pumping well TWN-2 decreased from approximately 111
mg/L last quarter to 42.6 mgiL this quarter. The nitrate concentration in nitrate pumping well
TW4-22 increased from approximately 45 to 55 mg/L, the highest detected in the current quarter,
and chloroform decreased from 13,300 !!giL to 12,100 !!giL. Chloroform changes are likely in
response to the start-up of nitrate pumping in the first quarter of 2013 and are affected by the
presence of historically high chloroform concentrations at adjacent, cross-gradient well TW4-20.
MW-27, located west of TWN-2, and TWN-18, located north of TWN-3, bound the nitrate
plume to the west and north (See Figure I-1 under Tab I). In addition, the southernmost
(downgradient) boundary of the plume remains between MW-30/MW-31 and MW-5/MW-11.
Nitrate concentrations at MW-5 (adjacent to MW-11) and MW-11 have historically been low(<
1 mg/L) or non-detect for nitrate (See Table 5). MW-25, MW-26, MW-32, TW4-16, TW4-19,
TW4-20, TW4-25, TWN-1, and TWN-4 bound the nitrate plume to the east.
As discussed above, the northeastern extent of the plume has been reduced, with the plume
boundary moving to the west away from TW4-19, TW4-20, and TW4-25, primarily due to
decreases in concentrations at these wells and TWN-2 .. Nitrate concentrations outside the nitrate
plume exceed 10 mg/L at a few locations: TW4-10 (16.8 mgiL), TW4-12 (18.4 mg/L), TW4-18
(12.8 mgiL), TW4-26 (14.2 mg/L), TW4-27 (31.3 mg/L), and TW4-28 (16.9 mgiL). All these
wells are located southeast of the nitrate plume as defined in the CAP and all are separated from
the plume by wells having nitrate concentrations that are either non-detect, or, if detected, are
less than 10 mg/L. Concentrations at TW4-10, TW4-12, TW4-18, TW4-26, TW4-27 and TW4-
28 are within 20% of their concentrations during the previous quarter. Elevated nitrate at TW 4-
10 and TW4-18 is associated with the chloroform plume and is within the capture zone of the
chloroform pumping system. Elevated nitrate at TW4-12, TW4-26, TW4-27, and TW4-28 is
likely related to former cattle ranching operations at the site.
Chloride concentrations are measured because elevated chloride (greater than 100 mgiL) is
associated with the nitrate plume. Chloride concentrations at all measured locations are within
20% of their respective concentrations during the previous quarter except at the following
locations: TW4-24 (decreased from 1030 mg/L to 809 mg/L) and Piezometer 2 (increased from
20
9.2 mg/L to 11.4 mg/L). TW4-24 is a nitrate pumping well; fluctuations in concentrations at
pumping wells and wells adjacent to pumping wells likely result in part from the effects of
pumping. Piezometer 2 is located between the northern wildlife ponds. Increases in
concentrations at wells near the northern wildlife ponds are anticipated as a result of reduced
dilution caused by cessation of water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds.
4.3 Estimation of Pumped Nitrate Mass and Residual Nitrate Mass within the Plume
Nitrate mass removed by pumping is summarized in Table 2, and includes mass removed by both
chloroform and nitrate pumping wells. Table 3 shows the volume of water pumped at each well
and Table 4 provides the details of the nitrate removal for each well. Mass removal calculations
begin with the third quarter of 2010 because the second quarter, 2010 data were specified to be
used to establish a baseline mass for the nitrate plume. As stated in the CAP, the baseline mass is
to be calculated using the second quarter, 2010 concentration and saturated thickness data
"within the area of the kriged 10 mg/L plume boundary." The second quarter, 2010 data set was
considered appropriate because "the second quarter, 2010 concentration peak at TWN-2 likely
identifies a high concentration zone that still exists but has migrated away from the immediate
vicinity of TWN-2."
As shown in Table 2, a total of approximately 870 lb of nitrate has been removed from the
perched zone since the third quarter of 2010. Prior to the last quarter, all direct nitrate mass
removal resulted from operation of chloroform pumping wells MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-
19, and TW4-20. During the current quarter:
• A total of approximately 103 lb of nitrate was removed by the chloroform pumping wells
and by nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2.
• Of the 103 lb removed during the current quarter, approximately 91 lb, (or 88 %), was
removed by the nitrate pumping wells.
Baseline mass and current quarter mass estimates (nitrate + nitrite as N) for the nitrate plume are
approximately 43,700 lb and 31,410 lbs, respectively. Mass estimates were calculated within the
plume boundaries as defined by the kriged 10 mg/L isocon by 1) gridding (kriging) the nitrate
concentration data on 50-foot centers; 2) calculating the volume of water in each grid cell based
on the saturated thickness and assuming a porosity of 0.18; 3) calculating the mass of
nitrate+nitrite as N in each cell based on the concentration and volume of water for each cell; and
4) totaling the mass of all grid cells within the 10 mg/L plume boundary. Data used in these
calculations included data from wells listed in Table 3 of the CAP.
The nitrate mass estimate for the current quarter is lower than the baseline estimate by 12,290 lb,
and this difference is greater than the amount of nitrate mass removed directly by pumping.
Changes in the quarterly mass estimates are expected to result primarily from 1) nitrate mass
removed directly by pumping, 2) natural attenuation of nitrate, and 3) changes in nitrate
concentrations in wells within the plume as a result of re-distribution of nitrate within the plume
and changes in saturated thicknesses. Redistribution of nitrate within the plume and changes in
saturated thicknesses will be impacted by changes in pumping and in background conditions
such as the decay of the perched water mound associated with the northern wildlife ponds.
Cessation of water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds is expected to result in reduced
21
saturated thicknesses and reduced dilution, which in turn is expected to result in increases in
concentrations.
The mass estimate during the current quarter (31 ,410 lb) was smaller than the mass estimate
during the previous quruter (41,150 lb) by 9,740 lb or 24%. The primary reason for this
difference is lower nitrate concentrations measured in many wells within the plume this quarter
compared to last quarter, especially TWN-2, which decreased from approximately 111 to 43
mg/L.
Nitrate mass removal by pumping and natural attenuation (expected to result primarily from
pyrite oxidation/nitrate reduction) act to lower nitrate mass within the plume. Changes resulting
from redistribution of nitrate within the plume are expected to result in both increases and
decreases in concentrations at wells within the plume and therefore increases and decreases in
mass estimates based on those concentrations, thus generating 'noise' in the mass estimates.
Furthermore, because the sum of sampling and analytical error is typically about 20%, changes
in the mass estimates from quarter to quruter of up to 20% could result from typical sampling
and analytical error alone. Only longer-term analyses of the mass estimates that minimize the
impacts of these quarter to quarter variations will provide useful information on plume mass
trends. Over the long term, nitrate mass estimates are expected to trend downward as a result of
direct removal by pumping and through natural attenuation.
As specified in the CAP, once eight quarters of data have been collected (starting with the first
quarter of 2013), a regression trend line will be applied to the quarterly mass estimates and
evaluated. The trend line will then be updated quarterly and reevaluated as additional quarters of
data are collected. The evaluation will determine whether the mass estimates are increasing,
decreasing, or stable.
5.0 LONG TERM PUMP TEST AT TWN-02, TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-
25 OPERATIONS REPORT
5.1 Introduction
Beginning in January 2013, EFRI began long term pumping of TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and
TWN-02 as required by the Nitrate CAP, dated May 7, 2012 and the SCO dated December 12,
2012.
In addition, as a part of the investigation of chloroform contamination at the Mill site, EFRI has
been conducting a Long Term Pump Test on MW-4, TW4-19, MW-26, and TW4-20, and, since
January 31, 2010, TW4-4. The purpose of the test is to serve as an interim action that will
remove a significant amount of chloroform-contaminated water while gathering additional data
on hydraulic properties in the area of investigation.
Because wells MW-4, TW4-19, MW-26, TW4-4 and TW4-20 are pumping wells that may
impact the removal of nitrate, they are included in this report and any nitrate removal realized as
part of this pumping is calculated and included in the quarterly reports.
The following information documents the operational activities during the quarter.
22
5.2 Pumping Well Data Collection
Data collected during the quarter included the following:
• Measurement of water levels at MW-4, TW4-19, MW-26, and TW4-20 and,
commencing regularly on March 1, 2010, TW4-4, on a weekly basis, and at
selected temporary wells and permanent monitoring wells on a monthly basis.
• Measurement of pumping history, including:
pumping rates
total pumped volume
operational and non-operational periods.
• Periodic sampling of pumped water for chloroform and nitrate/nitrite analysis and
other constituents
• Measurement of water levels weekly at TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-02
commencing January 28, 2013, and on a monthly basis selected temporary wells
and permanent monitoring wells.
5.3 Water Level Measurements
Beginning August 16, 2003, water level measurements from chloroform pumping wells MW-4,
MW-26, and TW4-19 were conducted weekly. From commencement of pumping TW4-20, and
regularly after March 1, 2010 for TW4-4, water levels in these two chloroform pumping wells
have been measured weekly. From commencement of pumping in January 2013, water levels in
wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-02 have been measured weekly. Copies of the
weekly Depth to Water monitoring sheets for MW-4, MW-26, TW4-19, TW4-20, TW4-4, TW4-
22, TW4-24, TW4-25 and TWN-02 are included under Tab C.
Monthly depth to water monitoring is required for all of the chloroform contaminant
investigation wells and non-pumping wells MW-27, MW-30, MW-31, TW4-21, TWN-1, TWN-
3, TWN-4, TWN-7, and TWN-18. Copies of the monthly depth to Water monitoring sheets are
included under Tab C.
5.4 Pumping Rates and Volumes
The pumping wells do not pump continuously, but are on a delay device. The wells purge for a
set amount of time and then shut off to allow the well to recharge. Water from the pumping
wells is either transferred to the Cell 1 evaporation pond or is used in the Mill process.
The pumped wells are fitted with a flow meter which record tb volume of water pumped Fr m
the well in gallons. The flow meter readings howo in Tab are u ed lO calculate the gallon of
water pumped from the wells each quarter as requ ired by Section 7 .2.2 of the CAP. Tbe average
pumping rates and quarterly volumes for each of the pumping weJI are shown in Table 3. Th
cumulative volume of water pumped from each of the wells is shown in Table 4.
On February 17, 2014, EFRI Field Personnel noted that the pump in TW 4-19 was not working.
The pump was replaced on February 18, 2014 and was fully operational within 24 hours of
discovery. Therefore, no notice to DRC was required.
23
Except for noted above, no other operational problems were observed with the wells or pumping
equipment during the quarter.
6.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT
There are no corrective actions resulting from the 1st quarter 2014 nitrate sampling event.
6.1 Assessment of Previous Quarter's Corrective Actions
There were no corrective actions in the 4th quarter 2013 nitrate sampling event.
7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
As per the CAP, the current quarter is the second quarter that hydraulic capture associated with
nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 was evaluated. Water level
monitoring indicates that the apparent capture of the combined nitrate and chloroform pumping
systems has been reduced compared to last qumter primarily due to a recovery in water level
(decrease in drawdown) at TW4-25. Monitoring also indicates that capture associated with
nitrate pumping wells is developing and is expected to increase over time as water levels decline
due to pumping and to cessation of water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds. Furthermore,
the evaluation of the long term interaction between nitrate and chloroform pumping systems will
require more data to be collected as part of routine monitoring. Slow development of hydraulic
capture by the nitrate pumping system is consistent with, and expected based on the relatively
low permeability of the perched zone at the site. Definition of capture associated with the nitrate
pumping system will also be influenced by the perched groundwater mound and the apparently
anomalously low water level at TWN-7.
Current pumping is likely sufficient to eventually capture the entire nitrate plume upgradient of
TW4-22 and TW4-24. Pumping during the current quarter exceeds the estimated pre-pumping
('background') rate of perched water flow through the nitrate plume by a factor between
approximately 1.2 and 2.5. Because the pre-pumping flow calculations likely overestimate the
new 'background' conditions caused by reduced recharge from the northern wildlife ponds, and
because the average plume hydraulic conductivity estimate from the low end of the calculated
range is likely to be more representative of actual conditions, nitrate pumping may exceed flow
through the plume by a factor greater than 2.5.
First quarter, 2014 nitrate concentrations at many of the wells within and adjacent to the nitrate
plume were within 20% of the values reported during the previous quarter, suggesting that
variations are within the range typical for sampling and analytical error. Changes in
concentration greater than 20% occurred in wells MW-26, TW4-16, TW4-19, TW4-20, TW4-21,
TW4-22, TW4-25, and TWN-2 . The concentrations in wells MW-11, MW-25, and MW-32
remained non-detect..
Of the wells showing changes in concentration greater than 20%, MW-26, TW4-19 and TW4-20
are chloroform pumping wells, and TW4-22, TW4-25 and TWN-2 are nitrate pumping wells.
TW4-21 is located adjacent to chloroform pumping well TW4-19 and nitrate pumping well
TW4-25; and TW4-16 is located adjacent to chloroform pumping well MW-26. Nitrate
24
concentration fluctuations at pumping wells and adjacent wells likely result in part from the
effects of pumping.
The nitrate concentration in nitrate pumping well TWN-2 decreased from approximately 111
mg/L last quarter to 42.6 mg/L this quarter The nitrate concentration in nitrate pumping well
TW4-22 increased from approximately 45 to 55 mg/L, the highest detected during the current
quarter, and chloroform decreased from 13,300 flg/L to 12,100 flg/L. Chloroform changes are
likely in response to the start-up of nitrate pumping in the first quarter of 2013 and are affected
by the presence of historically high chloroform concentrations at adjacent, cross-gradient well
TW4-20.
Changes in nitrate concentrations at wells within the nitrate plume since the last quarter have
resulted in an overall shrinkage of the plume area. The northeastern extent of the plume has been
reduced, primarily due to a decrease in concentrations at TWN-2. MW-27, located west of
TWN-2, and TWN-18, located north of TWN-3, bound the nitrate plume to the west and north
(See Figure I-1 under Tab I). In addition, the southernmost (downgradient) boundary of the
plume remains between MW-30/MW-31 and MW-5/MW-11. Nitrate concentrations at MW-5
(adjacent to MW-11) and MW-11 have historically been low(< 1 mg/L) or non-detect for nitrate
(See Table 5). MW-25, MW-26, MW-32, TW4-16, TW4-19, TW4-20, TW4-25, TWN-1, and
TWN-4 bound the nitrate plume to the east.
Nitrate concentrations at MW-30 and MW-31 continue to be relatively stable, suggesting that
plume migration is minimal or absent. Nitrate in MW-30 decreased from 19.5 mg/L to 18.4 mg/L
and nitrate in MW-31 decreased from 23.9 mg/L to 20.6 mg/L. Changes in both wells were less
than 20% suggesting the changes are within the range typical for sampling and analytical error.
Based on the concentration data at MW-5, MW-11, MW-30, and MW-31 , the nitrate plume is
under control
Chloride has been relatively stable at MW-30 but appears to be increasing at MW-31. The
apparent increase in chloride and stable nitrate at MW-31 suggests a natural attenuation process
that is affecting nitrate but not chloride. A likely process that would degrade nitrate but leave
chloride unaffected is reduction of nitrate by pyrite. The likelihood of this process in the perched
zone is discussed in HGC, December 7 2012; Investigation of Pyrite in the Perched Zone, White
Mesa Uranium Mill Site, Blanding, Utah.
Nitrate mass removal by pumping and natural attenuation (expected to result primarily from
pyrite oxidation/nitrate reduction) act to lower nitrate mass within the plume. Changes resulting
from redistribution of nitrate within the plume are expected to result in both increases and
decreases in concentrations at wells within the plume and therefore increases and decreases in
mass estimates based on those concentrations, thus generating 'noise' in the mass estimates.
Furthermore, because the sum of sampling and analytical error is typically about 20%, changes
in the mass estimates from quarter to quarter of up to 20% could result from typical sampling
and analytical error alone. Only longer-term analyses of the mass estimates that minimize the
impact of these quarter to quarter variations will provide useful information on plume mass
trends. Over the long term, nitrate mass estimates are expected to trend downward as a result of
direct removal by pumping and through natural attenuation.
25
As specified in the CAP, once eight quarters of data have been collected (starting with the first
quarter of 2013), a regression trend line will be applied to the quarterly mass estimates and
evaluated. The trend line will then be updated quarterly and reevaluated as additional quarters of
data are collected. The evaluation will determine whether the mass estimates are increasing,
decreasing, or stable.
During the current quarter, a total of approximately 103 lb of nitrate was removed by the
chloroform pumping wells and by nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-
2. Of the 103 lb removed during the current quarter, approximately 91 lb, (or 88 %), was
removed by the nitrate pumping wells.
The baseline nitrate (nitrate+nitrite as N) plume mass calculated as specified in the CAP (based
on second quarter, 2010 data) was approximately 43,700 lb. The nitrate plume mass estimate for
the current quarter was calculated as 31,410 lb which was lower than the previous quarter's
estimate of 41,150 lb by 9,740 lb or 24%. The primary reason for the decrease was the decrease
in concentration at TWN-2 from 111 mg/L last quarter to approximately 43 mg!L this quarter.
Nitrate concentrations outside the nitrate plume exceed 10 mg/L at a few locations: TW4-10
(16.8 mg/L), TW4-12 (18.4 mg/L), TW4-18 (12.8 mg/L), TW4-26 (14.2 mg/L), TW4-27 (31.3
mg/L), and TW4-28 (16.9 mg/L). All these wells are located southeast of the nitrate plume as
defined in the CAP and all are separated from the plume by wells having nitrate concentrations
that are either non-detect, or, if detected, are less than 10 mg/L. Concentrations at TW4-10,
TW4-12, TW4-18, TW4-26, TW4-27 and TW4-28 are within 20% of their concentrations during
the previous quarter. Elevated nitrate at TW 4-10 and TW 4-18 is associated with the chloroform
plume and is within the capture zone of the chloroform pumping system. Elevated nitrate at
TW4-12, TW4-26, TW4-27, and TW4-28 is likely related to former cattle ranching operations at
the site. Increases in both nitrate and chloride concentrations at wells near the northern wildlife
ponds are anticipated as a result of reduced dilution caused by cessation of water delivery to the
northern wildlife ponds.
Nitrate mass removal from the perched zone increased substantially by the start-up of nitrate
pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 during the first quarter of 2013.
Continued operation of these wells is therefore recommended. Pumping these wells, regardless
of any short term fluctuations in concentrations detected at the wells, helps to reduce
downgradient nitrate migration by removing nitrate mass and reducing average hydraulic
gradients, thereby allowing natural attenuation to be more effective. Continued operation of the
nitrate pumping system is expected to eventually reduce nitrate concentrations within the plume
and to further reduce or halt downgradient nitrate migration.
EFRI and its consultants have raised the issues and potential effects associated with cessation of
water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds in March, 2012 during discussions with DRC in
March 2012 and May 2013. While past recharge from the ponds has helped limit many
constituent concentrations within the chloroform and nitrate plumes by dilution, the associated
groundwater mounding has increased hydraulic gradients and contributed to plume migration.
Since use of the northern wildlife ponds ceased in March 2012, the reduction in recharge and
decay of the associated groundwater mound is expected to increase many constituent
26
concentrations within the plumes while reducing hydraulic gradients and rates of plume
migration.
The net impact of reduced wildlife pond recharge is expected to be beneficial even though it is
also expected to result in higher concentrations that will persist until continued mass reduction
via pumping and natural attenuation ultimately reduce concentrations. Temporary increases in
nitrate concentrations are judged less important than reduced nitrate migration rates. The actual
impacts of reduced recharge on concentrations and migration rates will be defined by continued
monitoring.
8.0 ELECTRONIC DATA FILES AND FORMAT
EFRI has provided to the Director an electronic copy of all laboratory results for groundwater
quality monitoring conducted under the nitrate contaminant investigation during the Quarter, in
Comma Separated Values ("CSV") format. A copy of the transmittal e-mail is included under
Tab L.
27
9.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION
This document was prepared by Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. on May 19, 2014.
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
Frank Filas, P.E
Vice President, Permitting and Environmental Affairs
28
Certification:
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared
under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified
personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the
person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,
and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.
~ Frank Fil a P.E ·
Vice President, Permitting and Environmental Affairs
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
29
Table 1
Sumrnary of Well Sampling and Constituents for the Period
WeD Sample Colleetion l>at4:
Piezometer 01 1113/2014
Piezometer 02 1113/2014
Piezometer 03 1113/2014
TWN-01 1114/2014
TWN-02 1113/2014
TWN-03 1115/2014
TWN-04 1114/2014
TWN-07 1/15/2014
TWN-07R 1114/2014
TWN-18 1114/2014
TW4-22 1/27/2014
TW4-24 1127/2014
TW4-25 1127/2014
TWN-60 1115/2014
TW4-60 2/6/2014
TWN-65 1/14/2014
Note: All wells were sampled for Nitrate and Chloride.
TWN-60 is a DI Field Blank.
TWN-65 is a duplicate of TWN-04.
TW4-60 is the chloroform program DI Field Blank.
Continuously pumped well.
Date of. Lab Report
1/27/2014
1127/2014
1127/2014
1127/2014
1127/2014
1127/2014
1127/2014
1127/2014
1/27/2014
1/27/2014
2/10/2014
2/10/2014
2/10/2014
1/27/2014
2117/2014
1127/2014
Table 2
Nitrate Mass Removal Per Well Per Quarter
MW-4 TW4-19 TW4-20 1 TW4-4 TW4-22 TW4-24 TW4-25 TWN-02 Quarter Totals 1
Quarter (lbs.) MW-26 (lbs.) [Jf (lbs.) . (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.)
Q3 2010 3.2 0.3 5.8 1.7 4.7 NA NA NA NA 15.7
Q4 2010 3.8 0.4 17.3 1.4 5.1 NA NA NA NA 28.0
Ql 2011 2.9 0.2 64.5 1.4 4.3 NA NA NA NA 73.3
Q2 2011 3.5 0.1 15.9 2.7 4.7 NA NA NA NA 27.0
Q3 2011 3.5 0.5 3.5 3.9 5.4 NA NA NA NA 16.8
Q4 2011 3.8 0.8 6.2 2.5 6.4 NA NA NA NA 19.7
Q1 2012 3.6 0.4 0.7 5.0 6.0 NA NA NA NA 15.9
Q2 2012 3.7 0.6 3.4 2.1 5.2 NA NA NA NA 15.0
Q3 2012 3.8 0.5 3.6 2.0 4.7 NA NA NA NA 14.7
Q4 2012 3.2 0.4 5.4 1.8 4.2 NA NA NA NA 14.9
Q1 2013 2.5 0.4 14.1 1.4 3.6 8.1 43.4 7.5 14.8 95.7
Q2 2013 2.5 0.5 5.6 1.7 3.5 10.7 37.1 6.4 23.9 91.7
Q3 2013 3.0 0.4 48.4 1.4 3.8 6.3 72.8 6.9 33.4 176.5
Q4 2013 3.1 0.3 15.8 1.6 3.9 9.4 75.2 6.4 46.3 162.1
Ql 2014 2.7 0.4 4.1 1.2 3.6 11.2 60.4 2.3 17.2 103.1
Well Totals (pounds) 48.8 6.3 214.3 31.8 69.1 45.7 288.9 29.6 135.6 870.1
Table 3 Nitrate Well Pumping Rates and Volumes
Volume of Water Pumped
Pumping Well Name During the Quarter (gals) Average Pump Rate (gpm)
MW-4 69,833.8 4.4
MW-26 23,263.1 10.3
TW4-4 58,992.9 7.9
TW4-19 304,851.0 16.1
TW4-20 18,781.6 9.7
TW4-22 24,532.0 18.1
TW4-24 229,063.9 17.3
TW4-25 129,979.2 17.9
TWN-2 48,320.4 18.3
Table4
Table 4 Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
MW-4 MW-26 -. l
I I I. .,
Total
Total Total Pumped Total Total Total Pumped Cone Cone j Pumped
l_r_otal (ug)
Total Total
Quarter Pumped (gal) Conc(mg/L) Cone (ug/L) (liters) Total (ug) (grams6 (pounds) (gal) (mg/L) (ug/L) (liters) (grams) (pounds)
r-
·'
Total Gallons II pumped for Total
the quarter Total pumped Total gramsl453.
Calculations from the Concentration Concentration gallons/3.785 Concentration ug/1000000 592to
and Data Flow Meter from the in mg/LX1000 to to conver to in ug/L X total to convert to convert to
Origination data analytical data convert to ug/L liters liters grams pounds -
Q3 2010 79859.1 4.8 4800 302266.7 1450880129 1450.9 3.20 63850.0 0.6 600 241672.3 145003350 145 0.32
Q4 2010 90042.2 5 5000 340809.7 1704048635 1704.0 3.76 60180.0 0.7 700 227781.3 159446910 159 0.35
Q12011 76247,6 4.6 4600 288597.2 1327546964 1327.5 2.93 55130.0 0.5 500 208667.1 104333525 104 0,23
Q2 2011 85849.3 4.9 4900 324939.6 1592204042 1592.2 3.51 55800.6 0.3 300 211205.3 63361581 63 0,14
Q3 2011 85327.7 4.9 4900 322965.3 1582530188 1582.5 3.49 65618.0 0.9 900 248364.1 223527717 224 0.49
Q4 2011 89735.0 5.1 5100 339647.0 1732199573 1732.2 3.82 50191.3 2 2000 189974.1 379948141 380 0.84
Q12012 90376.4 4.8 4800 342074.7 1641958435 1642.0 3.62 31440.1 1.7 1700 119000.8 202301323 202 0.45
Q2 2012 90916.5 4.9 4900 344118.8 1686181940 1686.2 3.72 26701.2 2.5 2500 101064.1 252660294 253 0.56
Q3 2012 91607.0 5 5000 346732.5 1733662475 1733.7 3.82 25246.0 2.6 2600 95556.1 248445886 248 0.55
Q4 2012 78840.0 4.8 4800 298409.4 1432365120 1432.4 3.16 30797.0 1.46 1460 116566.6 170187302 170 0.38
012013 62943.7 4.78 4780 238241.9 1138796304 1138.8 2.51 22650.7 2.27 2270 85732.9 194613682 195 0.43
Q2 2013 71187.3 4.22 4220 269443.9 1137053387 1137.1 2.51 25343.4 2.11 2110 95924.8 202401263 202 0.45
Q3 2013 72898.8 4.89 4890 275922.0 1349258375 1349.3 2.97 25763.0 1.98 1980 97513.0 193075651 193 0.43
Q4 2013 70340.4 5.25 5250 266238.4 1397751674 1397.8 3.08 24207.6 1.38 1380 91625.8 126443557 126 0.28
Q4 2013 69833.8 4.7 4700 264320.9 1242308385 1242.3 2.74 23263.1 2.12 2120 88050.8 186667767 187 0.41
Totals Since Q3
2010 1206004.75 48.83 586182.0 6.29
Highlighted cells are the total for the current quarter
Table4
Table 4 Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
TW4·19 =~ TW4-20 -
I 1r
I
Total Pumped Cone Cone Total Pumped Total Total "rotal Pumped Cone Cone Total Pumped Total Total
Quarter {gal) (mg/L) (ug/L) (liters) ~ Total (ug) (grams) (pounds) (gal) (mg/L) (ugll) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds)=
' '
I
i I I
I
Calculations i
and Data
Origination I L
Q3 2010 116899.2 5.9 5900 442463.5 2.611E+09 2611 5.76 39098.3 5.3 5300 147987.1 784331447 784 1.73
Q4 2010 767970.5 2.7 2700 2906768.3 7.848E+09 7848 17.30 36752.5 4.6 4600 139108.2 639897778 640 1.41
Q12011 454607.9 17 17000 1720690.9 2.925E+10 29252 64.49 37187.5 4.4 4400 140754.7 619320625 619 1.37
Q2 2011 159238.9 12 12000 602719.2 7.233E+09. 7233 15.95 67907.7 4.8 4800 257030.6 1.234E+09 1234 2.72
Q3 2011 141542.6 3 3000 535738.7 1.607E+09 1607 3.54 72311.2 6.5 6500 273697.9 1.779E+09 1779 3.92
Q42011 147647.2 5 5000 558844.7 2.794E+09 2794 6.16 72089.3 4.2 4200 272858.0 1.146E+09 1146 2.53
Q12012 148747.0 0.6 600 563007.4 337804437 338 0.74 76306.0 7.9 7900 288818.2 2.282E+09 2282 5.03
Q2 2012 172082.0 2.4 2400 651330.5 1.563E+09 1563 3.45 22956.4 11 11000 86890.1 955790963 956 2.11
Q3 2012 171345.0 2.5 2500 648540.8 1.621E+09 1621 3.57 22025.0 10.8 10800 83364.6 900337950 900 1.98
Q4 2012 156653.0 4.1 4100 592931.6 2.431E+09 2431 5.36 20114.0 11 11000 76131.5 837446390 837 1.85
Q12013 210908.0 7.99 7990 798286.8 6.378E+09 6378 14.06 18177.0 9.07 9070 68799.9 624015501 624 1.38
Q2 2013 226224.0 2.95 2950 856257.8 2.526E+09 2526 5.57 20252.4 9.76 9760 76655.3 748156060 748 1.65
Q3 2013 329460.1 17.6 17600 1247006.5 2.195E+10 21947 48.39 19731.0 8.65 8650 74681.8 645997873 646 1.42
Q4 2013 403974.0 4.7 4700 1529041.6 7.186E+09 7186 15.84 19280.2 9.64 9640 72975.6 703484369 703 1.55
042013 304851.0 1.62 1620 1153861.0 1.869E+09 1869 4.12 18781.6 7.56 7560 71088.4 537427971 537 1.18
Totals Since Q3
2010 3912150.4 214.30 562970.1 31.83
Highlighted cells are the total for the current quarter
Table4
Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
1W4-4 > 1W4-22
:
Total Total Total Total I
Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total
Quarter (gal) (mgll) (ugfl) (liters) Total (ug) ! (grams) (pounds) (gal) ,, (mgll) (ugll) (liters) , , Total (ug) (grams) (pounds)
' I I
' ..
Calculations . I
and Data
Origination
03 2010 76916.8 7.30 7300.00 291130.1 2.1E+09 2125.25 4.69 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
04 2010 86872.1 7.10 7100.00 328810.9 2.3E+09 2334.56 5.15 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
012011 73360.0 7.00 7000.00 277667.6 1.9E+09 1943.67 4.29 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
02 2011 80334.6 7.00 7000.00 304066.5 2.1E+09 2128.47 4.69 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
03 2011 97535.0 6.60 6600.00 369170.0 2.4E+09 2436.52 5.37 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
042011 109043.5 7.00 7000.00 412729.6 2.9E+09 2889.11 6.37 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
012012 101616.8 7.10 7100.00 384619.6 2.7E+09 2730.80 6.02 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
02 2012 87759.1 7.10 7100.00 332168.2 2.4E+09 2358.39 5.20 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
03 2012 80006.0 7.10 7100.00 302822.7 2.2E+09 2150.04 4.74 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
04 2012 71596.0 7.00 7000.00 270990.9 1.9E+09 1896.94 4.18 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
012013 58716.8 7.36 7360.00 222243.1 1,6E+09 1635.71 3.61 16677.4 58.0 58000.0 63124.0 3661189622.0 3661.2 8.07
02 2013 65603.4 6.30 6300.00 248308.9 1.6E+09 1564.35 3.45 25523.2 50.2 50200.0 96605.3 4849586662.4 4849.6 10.69
03 2013 63515.4 7.22 7220.00 240405.8 1.7E+09 1735.73 3.83 25592.9 29.7 29700.0 96869.1 2877013057.1 2877.0 6.34
Q4 2013 60233.6 7.84 7840.00 227984.2 1.8E+09 1787.40 3.94 24952.2 45.2 45200.0 94444.1 4268872280.4 4268.9 9.41
042013 58992.9 7.28 7280.00 ~288.1 1 1.6E+09 1625.54 3.58 24532.0 54.6 54600.0 ~853.6 5069807652.0 5069.8 11.18
Totals Since Q3
2010 1172102.0 69.10 117277.7 45.69
Highlighted cells are the total for the current quarter
Table 4
Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
TW4-24 - -
-TW4-25 --I
I
I
'
Total Total Total Total
Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total
Quarter (gal) (mg/L) (ug/L) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds) (gal) (mg/L) (ug/L) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds)
,,
f • Calculations
and Data
Origination ~ -
Q3 2010 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q4 2010 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA I
Q12011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA I
Q2 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q3 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA I
Q4 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA I
Q12012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA I
Q2 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA I
Q3 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA I
Q4 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA I
Q12013 144842.6 35.9 35900.0 548229.2 19681429751.9 19681,4 43.39 99369.9 9.0 9000.0 376115.1 3385035643.5 3385.0 7.46 i
Q2 2013 187509.3 23.7 23700.0 709722.7 16820428001.9 16820.4 37.08 147310.4 5.2 5240.0 557569.9 2921666087.4 2921.7 6.44
Q3 2013 267703.5 32.6 32600.0 1013257.7 33032202568.5 33032.2 72.82 145840.9 5.69 5690.0 552007.8 3140924419.0 3140.9 6.92 I
Q4 2013 260555.3 34.6 34600.0 986201.8 34122582643.3 34122.6 75.23 126576.5 6.10 6100.0 479092.1 2922461520.3 2922.5 6.44 I
Q42013 229063.9 31.6 31600.0 867006.9 27397416823.4 27397.4 60.40 129979.2 2.16 2160.0 491971.3 1062657947.5 1062.7 2.34 I ---
Totals Since Q3
2010 1089674.6 288.92 649076.9 29.61
Highlighted cells are the total for the current quarter
Table4
Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
TWN-02 ·-
~ ..., .
~roliit ~~: "J'olal Total b,-~r
P.ulile!!9 (:X) Cone Pumped Tollll :row WeU!t
Quarter. ' ~) ' {~) ('~) :filbil,(ugl . (g!jinj) f~n~) •(pc)u~'!rsJ
I
I I I
P;~la~· I
,alld'Qeta I _j ,Qri~ination
Q3 2010 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 15.69
Q42010 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 27.97
Q12011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 73.30
Q2 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 27.01
Q3 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 16.82
Q42011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 19.71
Q12012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 15.86
Q2 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 15.03
Q3 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 14.67
Q4 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 14.92
Q12013 31009.4 57.3 57300.0 117370.6 6725334176.7 6725.3 14.83 95.73
Q2 2013 49579.3 57.7 57700.0 187657.7 10827846433.9 10827.8 23.87 91.71
Q3 2013 50036.5 80.0 80000.0 189388.2 15151052200.0 15151.1 33.40 176.53
Q42013 49979.9 111.0 111000.0 189173.9 20998305286.5 20998.3 46.29 162.07
Q42013 48320,4 42,6 47.600.0 182892.7 7791229616A 7791.2 17.18 103.14
Totals Since Q3
2010 228925.5 135.57 870.15
Highlighted cells are the total for the current quarter
I~
Loc~aon 2016
MW-;30 15.8
: MW-3 .1· 22.5
MW~ -ND
~Mw--n ND
ND = Not detected
NS = Not Sampled
Table 5
Nitrate Data Over Time forMW-30. MW-31. MW-5. and MW-11 ' ' '
Cf23 Q4 ~·I. ·<Q! Qo ~ (tJI ~ ~3 Q4
2o'ro 2d]O' 2o u 2012 20 12~ 2~.L2 c 20J 1 :20111 2011 ~012
15 16 16 17 16 16 17 16 17 18.5
21 20 21 22 21 21 21 20 21 23.6
NS 0.2 NS 0.2 NS 0.2 NS 0.1 NS ND
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
~I Q2 Q3 'Q4 Q;J
2,6l3 20)3 2.6jj , .... 2(>_U 20 14
21.4 18.8 17.6 19.5 18.4
19.3 23.8 21.7 23.9 20.6
NS ND NS 0.279 NS
ND ND ND ND ND
TABLE 6
Slug Test Results
(Using KGS Solution and Automatically Logged Data)
Well K
(cm/s)
MW-30 1.0E-04
MW-31 7.1 E-05
TW4-22 1.3E-04
TW4-24 1.6E-04
TW4-25 5.8E-05
TWN-2 1.5E-05
TWN-3 8.6E-06
Average 1
Average2
Average 3
Average 4
Notes:
Average 1 = arithemetic average of all wells
Average 2 = geometric average of all wells
K
(ftldav)
0.28
0.20
0.36
0.45
0.16
0.042
0.024
0.22
0.15
0.32
0.31
Average 3 = arithemetic average of MW-30, MW-31, TVI/4-22, and TW4-24
Average 4 =geometric average of MW-30, MW-31, TVI/4-22, and TVI/4-24
cmls = centimeters per second
ft/day = feet per day
K = hydraulic conductivity
KGS = KGS Unconfined Slug Test Solution in Aqtesolve TM.
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2014 01\FiowCalcs-Tables 6-7-8: Table 6
TABLE 7
Pre-Pumping Saturated Thicknesses
Depth to Depth to Water Saturated Thickness
Well Brushy Basin Fourth Quarter, 2012 Above Brushy Basin
(ft) ctn _if!}_
TW4-22 112 53 58
TW4-24 110 55 55
Notes:
ft =feet
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2014 01\FiowCalcs-Tables 6-7-8: Table 7
TABLE 8
Pre-Pumping Hydraulic Gradients and Flow Calculations
Pathline Boundaries
Path Length Head Change Hydraulic Gradient
(ft) (ft) (ft/ft)
TW4-25 to MW-31 2060 48 0.023
TWN-2 to MW-30 2450 67 0.027
average 0.025
1 min flow (gpm) 1.31
2 max flow (gpm) 2.79
Notes:
ft =feet
ftlft = feet per foot
gpm = gallons per minute
1 assumes width = 1 ,200ft; saturated thickness = 56ft; K = 0.15 ftlday; and gradient = 0.025 ftlft
2 assumes width = 1 ,200 ft; saturated thickness = 56 ft; K = 0.32 ft/day; and gradient = 0.025 ftlft
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2014 01\FiowCalcs-Tables 6-7-8: Table 8
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
Tab B Order of Sampling and Field Data Worksheets
Tab C Kriged Current Quarter Groundwater Contour Map, Capture Zone Map, Capture Zone Details
Map, and Weekly, Monthly and Quarterly Depth to Water Data
Tab D Kriged Previous Quarter Groundwater Contour Map
Tab E Hydrographs of Groundwater Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab F Depths to Groundwater and Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab G Laboratory Analytical Reports
Tab H Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
H-1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation
H-2 Holding Time Evaluation
H-3 Analytical Method Check
H-4 Reporting Limit Evaluation
H-5 QAJQC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
H-6 QC Control Limits for Analyses and Blanks
H-7 Receipt Temperature Evaluation
H-8 Rinsate Evaluation
Tab I Kriged Current Quarter Isoconcentration Maps
Tab J Analyte Concentration Data Over Time
Tab K Concentration Trend Graphs
Tab L CSV Transmittal Letter
Tab A
Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
TW4-35
¢
TW4-19 e
MW-5 • TW4-12
0
TWN-7
~
PIEZ-1
propc>sed temporary perched
monitoring Well ·
perched chloroform or
nitrate pumping well
perched monitoring well
temporary perched monitoring well
temporary perched nitrate monltoringw ell
~ perched piezometer
TW4-32
~ temporary perched monitoring well
installed September, 2013
RUIN SPRING 6 seep or spring
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
..:,. ..
~ ~.·'-. . .:. f:
.. ~8 ~
SITE PLAN SHOWING PERCHED WELL
AND PIEZOMETER LOCATIONS
WHITE MESA SITE
REFERENCE
H:/718000/may14/Uwelloc14.srf A-1
TabB
Order of Sampling and Field Data Worksheets
Name
Nitrate Mg/L
Previous
Qrt.
c
Nitrate Samples
Date/Purge sample
TWN-7 o.986 l 111S/I~t I cr73U
TWN-1 1.61
TWN-4 1.69
TWN-18 2.15
TWN-3 235
TWN-2 111.0
Duplicate of TwN • 0 'I
Rlnsate ~...:·;;;;..._ __
DISample T...JAi~()
Plez 1
PiitZ 2
Piez3
----
6.68
0.364
1.8
I JJLf/ ll.f 104"1
i/1'1111/ l2.ZI
I/ )l.j/ 1'1 J3lZ
\/IS/1'4 Ol"lO
, 1/ J?>/zcll.f )Lj]O
1 J )!>/ l'i D10C
I~/ 2-~t'1 l-:330
1/PIZDI"i l'Y>'t
1/1~/zclLI \315
Nitrate Order
1st Quarter 2014
Depth Total Depth
112.5
125.7
145
96
96
Rinsate Samples
Name Date Sample
TWN-7R 1,,,'1tzcJ:t I o'i57
TWN-1R
TWN-4R
TWN-18R
TWN-3R
TWN-2R
Samplers:
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
See instruction
D~~ptioo~Sam~~E~~ ~~~~~~-~--~~G~~-~_r_~-~~-~~J_,_~_f_G~Z_o~IY~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sampler Name
Location (well name):~~ _:?_;....;;-c.....;:?._-_o_l~~~~~~~~~--' and initials: I ...,=:,n<r H61/,-J(."))~H
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging 1.____..::\/:._:_:13=:::/~20=..;.,:,/....:.'1~~~~-' and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: [Q]pump or 00 bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: @]2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I Qu~f+erb A) .'h~fc... Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event ._I_'P;_,_c...;z.;....-_6_3~~~~~~_,
pH Buffer 7.0 {.0
Specific Conductance L-1 -:1:...:.q....:..~~~~~_.l~-tMHOS/ em
Depth to Water Before Purging I b3, 01
Weather Cond.
Time I )~Z4 I Gal. Purged I 0
Conductance I Zll,g I pH l4.lg
Temp. oc I r~.'lg I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I e7J I
Turbidity (NTU) I 3.~ I
Time I I Gal. Purged I
Conductance I I pH I
Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
I
I
I
I
pH Buffer 4.0 C\.b
Well Depth(O.Olft): 1'-_b ____ __,
Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:~_D __ -11(.653h)
3" Well:_ b _ (.367h)
Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling eventl._l _'-l._" __ _,
Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 05-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP}
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate Q) in gpm.
S/60 = L-[ ~b ___ _.
Time to evacuate two asing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ~..[ .J.;a:..!\J..:.:It:..!..::.L _____ _..J
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients [!] 0 lOOml 0 ~ H2S04 [2J 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 D 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) 11 0 Sample volume 0 1!1 0 IY
Chlor;J6 If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I b '3. 4 0 Sample Time
See instruction
Comment
Arr,'~e~ O(l S :-(., "'-t 1.323. -r.;:,,~r At!~ G-o.rr.',. p'(e5ot1J-f~ t:::bJJ~c:..J-S""Mp k.~.
~~pJtt> Co/1-.::G+od "'-t' l330. ~c:r ~~ ~~~ Glc::ar.
L~ s.:+c. IN+ )33">
Piez-01 01-13-2014 [Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I l~T Glv.o.rtc.r N•tt'e>.+c. 7.0JLj
See instruction
Location (well name): l.__f'_;_~_-z._~_()_'Z. _________ __,
Sampler N arne
and initials: j-r;"" u Y. 1),-~!;\ )7ft
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purgingl ._ __ ....;.11_1_'3_/_J!.f ____ __, and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: (![]pump or 00 bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: (!]2 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event I Q...,.,.rf.:;rl,j ,N;t,-.f(._ Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event I.__A/._~_11 ________ _.j
pH Buffer 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance ~I _1_,1..:...,_ ___ ___,1 ~-tMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): ._l_o ____ __.
Depth to Water Before Purging l 33.'-0 Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:~-:::-o-----il(.653h)
3" Well:. 1:> . (.367h)
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. ·c (prior sampling event)._! .Lf_'_--~
Time I \30'2. I Gal. Purged I ~ I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance 1 77~.1 I pH j1.os I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I:S I '11 I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 95z I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I z.ca I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pRj I
Temp. oc I I Temp. °C I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
s16o = l.___o ___ __, Time to evacuate two a ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q =I b I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 0
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ~...I_A_W_·_A_L ______ __,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y
VOCs D 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2S04 g)
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml D 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiotogk s 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume D m D
C:hlorld<. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth ~-:l3~~·=?l):so..c... __ ...~ Sample Time ~...I _13_6_~----l
See instruction
Comment
o" ~:te ~ ru;l.
collf!c.f.::;~ ~1
~;+c. Ol.+
~M<:r o.n~ G-.... rr;,.., pf'c.Sel'\+ fTJ t:oll~c,+-j~Mrle~.
\3DY. wa_+c..(' \.0~ Mo~+b c}eqr.
\'307
Piez-02 01-13-2014 lno not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
0
D
D
D
~
2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I 1l>T G?vco.rfe.r No'lrJ'c ?..OIL}
See instruction
Location (well name): ._l_1':_,_.a._~_0_3 _________ ____.
Sampler Name
and initials: 1 "i""'nnc.r Hoii,J~ m
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I 111~/Zt>Jlj and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: [ill pump or IT[] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: [g]2 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event I Qv..o.d!:f"G AJ,:ft~fc... Prev. Well Sampled in Sampli~g Event ~.--I_P_;_r::_z_-_0_2 _____ ---J
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 4.D
Specific Conductance!._ _zt_q_1 ____ _,1~-tMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): ._I _b ____ __,
Depth to Water Before Purging I 99.96 Casing Volume (V) 4" Weii:~-=0----11(.653h)
3" Well:_ ~ . (.367h)
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. ·c (prior sampling event)L..I ....:..9 _• __ _,
Time I t3li I Gal. Purged I 1> I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I z.~r7 I pH I ll.SZ I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. °C I \9.q3 I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ~~~ I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 1g.v I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I Temp. °C I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged D gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm,
S/60 = ._I __ o __ _.
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T= 2V/Q =I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) jo
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated IL-tJ ___ ---J
Name of Cettified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs l.__lt_w_A_L ______ ___J
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate
Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below)
VOCs D D 3x40 ml
Nutrients tJ D 100 ml
Heavy Metals D D 250m!
All Other Non Raliiologics D D 250m!
Gross Alplla D D 1,000 ml
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume
ch lor:J(.,
Final Depth I 50. K{g Sample Time ._11_3_15 ___ ~
Comment
s;f-c.. ~ 1~01, -r ... ~>ncl ,_,.,)._ G-Qrf:l\ pr~ent To
co1lc.c.tc~ aJ-r~ IS. w~-h.r Wl4,5 "\. \;t+/<..
~;1-G "'.t \~~~
Piez-03 01-13-2014 Jno not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Filtered Preservative Type Preservative Added
y N y N
D D HCL D D
D n H2S04 r9 D
D D HN03 D D
D D No Preserv. D D
D D HN03 D D
D ~ D ~
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
See instruction
2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date : 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I Lj'~ Q~~~~r+er :tJ i1'r"\1"e Zl>}Y
See instruction
Location (well name): I..._"TJ.....W~!V=---0.;::;...;..1 ________ ____.
Sampler N arne
and initials: 1....,.-~l!ur !'loll•dD;j/fB
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging '-l..;.;.li_I_Y.;.....I_-z._o'"""'I_Li"---------' and Sampling (if different) ._I '-N._Y'"""'A'----------'
Well Purging Equip Used: OOpump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I Gr u.f1 at o~
Purging Method Used: (!]2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I GvtMfc rJ:j A5•tr~>o.f<. Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event IL._-r_w_JJ_-_0_7 _____ ....J
pH Buffer 7.0 /,0
Specific Conductance '-I _q_11 ____ -'j ~-tMHOS/ em
Depth to Water Before Purging I S 3 . 05
Weather Cond.
Time I Jo4'1 I Gal. Purged I 5S I
Conductance I ~gz I pH j 7 .2.S I
Temp. oc I ltl.lJl;S I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 2:"l. 9 I
Turbidity (NTU) I Z:o I
Time llD4b I Gal. Purged I 77 I
Conductance I g1!!7 I pH I 7.'3 1 I
Temp. oc IJY,'fo I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I -z:~~ I
Turbidity (NTU) l z~ I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
pH Buffer 4.0 4.6
Well Depth(O.Olft): I II Z • SO
CasingVolume(V) 4"Well:l ~'5.55 ,(.653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) '-------'
Ext' IAmb. Temp. ·c {prior sampling event)l~....3.;:....6 __ __,
Time jJO% I Gal. Purged I ~ I
Conductance I g'U I pH 17. z.~ I
Temp. oc I Pi.~ 1 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I z-z.9 I
Turbidity (NTU) I Z'.G. I
Time I1D47 I Gal. Purged I~ I
Conductance I 2JOO I pHI 7.:5f I
Temp. °C 114/10 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) l Z:ICJ I
Turbidity (NTU) I Z:!> I
1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged Ll _g=g:_ ___ _, gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I '\.b
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 0
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs IAWA L
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y
VOCs D
Nutrients 1!1
Hcnv.y Metals D
All Other Non Radiologies D
Gross Alpha D
Other (specify) IB
C. hI or i d c.
Final Depth I g3 .'3S
Comment
Arri \l~~ •(\ .s."+c.. .-..+ IO~.b
'Pv-r~e ~~ ... .., ~r I03tf,
~11.#\ple.s co li cc..+~J. o~~.t IOY7,
Left .s.if c: .J I O..!ll
N specified below) y N y
D 3x40 ml D D HCL D
D lOOml D ~ H2S04 29
D 250ml D D HN03 D
D 250ml D D No Preserv. D
D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D
D Sample volume D ~ D
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Sample Time ._I _I o_Y_7'-----'
See instruction
-r;,.,.,c,. eM~ uo.rr:n pr~e.f\+ for .pv.r~~ 0.(10. ~rVIpiZ,
P~..~.r~eJ. v.;)ell .for,..._ -hst"l a+:' 8 ,.-,;,ll,fc:s. Pur~~ e11J~J
U.)~+c:.r 11-)o::~..S. P'\DSt!j cJ~r.
TWN-01 01-14-2014 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
D
D
IBl
2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I 1 ~T Q~~rt a A>rfr""+c:.. 20/L(
See instruction
Location (well name): ._I _li._W=:...tJ.::....---=0;...;:(=-_______ __.
Sampler N arne
and initials: I :-:f.~~,.-r H ~> Jl, J ~j/-r H
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging ._I _...:I....;./_J....:3:....:/.......;:;;z _o.:...l'-1_,__ __ ___. and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: OOpump or rm bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: [[]2 casings [[)3 casings
Sampling Event I Q'-'CA.f+e.tb A) ;to .. f c. Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event ._I_'P_It!_Z_-_0_1 _____ __.
pH Buffer 7.0 7,0 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance ._I _.1 ...... 1_._1 ___ ___.1 ~-tMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): L-1 'i..;..b._OD ___ --J
Depth to Water Before Purging I Z g, 03 Casing Volume (V) 4" Wcii:,I--0---~1(.653h)
3" Well:_ o . (.367h)
Weather Cond. Ext'! Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling event)IL-3_6 __ __.
Time I llj7. ~ I Gal. Purged I 0 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance l~oc;l I pH 1 ,,9o I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc 114'.5:3 I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 3glj I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) l J
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I Temp. °C I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill· Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2 ·Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 0 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q)~ in gpm.
s/60 = ._I _;.lZ=·_o __ __.
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1 a I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) l o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ~..l.::a4.:..;LJ,..r..~t..::'-;__ _____ __.
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients ~ D 100 ml D ~ H2S04 .lrJ D
Heavy Metals D D 250m! D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radio logies D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) til 0 Sample volume 0 )Q 0 lj
Ghlor~~{ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth ~.::I~::..:O:.....:._n=----...J Sample Time IYJD
See instruction
Comment
I p'-\YVJ~I'(j Wel]
TWN-02 01-13-2014 !Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I I Sf" Qv.c.rlter N ifrt.\f=<.. 2 0 )"'/
See instruction
Location (well name): "-I. _=t\_w_i\)_ .... _o_":S _________ --J
Sampler Name
and initials: =:rAnner HolliJ~/Ff
Field Sample ID 14'" wiO -03_D\ \5 "ZO\ "\
Date and Time for Purging l~--.::ll~lY.:.;./..;;'Z;...,;.,b..:..I~.;...._ ____ ...J and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: (rupump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: rn:J2 casings [9]3 casings
Sampling Event I Q'-\.DO.r+~r-1~ Ni+ra..f"(. Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event I~__J'i_WAJ_-_18 _____ ----J
pH Buffer 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 q,o
Specific Conductance 1~___"1_9...;..1 ___ -JI~MHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): I '!6, DO
Depth to Water Before Purging I :3 b • '55 Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:l 38, 1S ,(.653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) '----'"------'
Weather Cond. Ext' IAmb. Temp. ·c (prior sampling event) II...-'~;_" __ -'
Time ll3'\:3 I Gal. Purged I Y<i.SC I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I --z. '{l.'Z .. I pH I ~/fl) I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I IG."!3 I Temp. °C I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ZS1 I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I lz.,q I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time L u (S1 J Gal. Purged 10 I Time IV ,.,c.. I Gal. Purged 1 25 I
Conductance 1 '2-l.\ll I pH I <e:t. 7Z> I Conductance I 'Z.qoq I pHI '-·'73 I
Temp. oc I \3.-z.Z I Temp. oc I 1"3 :z.G I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2 -Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 4~.so gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I li.O
Time to evacuate two a in g volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 17.0$ I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) I 1.21
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ._I _,_ft::..W=!J .... ""'l-. _____ _.
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients ~ 0 IOOml D ~ H2S04 ~ D
Heuvy Metals 0 D 250 ml 0 0 HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologil:s 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. D D
Gross Alphu 0 D 1,000 ml D 0 HN03 D D
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume 0 ~ 0 Q!
C'hloriJ6 If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth ~..I ...;..9~_. '1.:...;7~.--__ ....J Sample Time o74'6
See instruction
Comment
ArrJ\IeJ on .$11~ ~+-13'3S -r;,.~er t.\nd G-o.rrJ'(I ?f't"~nt-.f'or rv.r~~{· ?~c~-e .b~V! 4-1331
f v..f"~d \l,)t.\1 f'or "" h ·h,l 6~ ~ ~;VJJ.e.~ .-.t~J 3o s~nJ~ ?v.r~c:~ \A.:)ell Jr~. Pu.r~e e11 deJ et r 13'-l~. v.)c:~..+c.r ~ W~o~~ C1~r. Le-A-s.-+c. ~ 1~'-i/
Au·;..,r:J on site. o:t 073.4 -r:nnc:r' ""'~ &Mrin pre~+ +o c.oll~c+ S'1Mf1~~. S.-.Mpl~ b"'.'leol
~+ 074n D<fl;.\, ~ ~«1--c.i' v.)o-6 3(:,,~&( t..e.-R-5lte ~+ 07'-ji
TWN-03 01-14-2014 lno not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I I sr Ghi>Arte..-A.) 14r,.fCJ 2 o 14
See instruction
Location (well name): L.l-r_W_!V_-_O_'i _________ __,
Sampler N arne
and initials: I ==t::n11er HoJI,'l~/-nf
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging L.l _11_14_/_-z._o_IY-'---------' and Sampling (if different) ~...-M....:::I....;.I-...:..~--------'
Well Purging Equip Used: oo::)pump or IQJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I &rv.niM~s.
Purging Method Used: [ID2 casings IQJ3 casings
Sampling Event I Qvo..Ck/j~ Jlj;"};ifc; Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event L.l-t_w_A>_-_0_1 _____ ___.
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 4.0
Specific Conductance L.l _'f..;..'f_1"------'IJ.A.MHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): I 12.5.,70
Depth to Water Before Purging l so:z.o Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:,4'J ,?;/) 1(.653h)
3" Well: o (.367h) ~'-----'
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling event}~.:l~=--f) __ _,
Time I l"Z '2.'i I Gal. Purged I 'f1 I Time l 1z7.5 I Gal. Purged I 110 I
Conductance I loqg I pH 17· oc. I Conductance I loq=r I pH I 7.0~ I
Temp. ac I ltt.GG I Temp. oc I (4 .• (;{; I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I -z;r:r I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I z 72:1 I
Turbidity (NTU) 1 191? I Turbidity (NTU) I liZ I
Time I rz't4 I Gal. Purged I 1'21 I Time I tZ'Z7 I Gal. Purged I13Z I
Conductance I jZ:S9b I pH I ,,z:,g I Conductance 11oqq I pHI 7,Io I
Temp. ac I Itt. bG I Temp. °C 114·'9 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I Z:S1 I Redox Potential Eh (m V) l ZS/ I
Turbidity (NTU) I l!fZ I Turbidity (NTU) I Jfjz. I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 132. gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
s16o = I p.o
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T = 2V /Q = I ~ . .:; b I
I o
"
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ._I '-'A-~_.Ii..:...L ______ ___.
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100 ml D ~ H2S04 'Kl
Heavy Metals 0 D 250 ml D D HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250m) 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha D 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 D
Other (specify) ID 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0
G.~ Jor;dc: If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I S.J, 'f 0 Sample Time 1227
See instruction
Comment
Arri\1~ Of\ si+e "'+ IZ.l'Z.. -r;.,,~r """~ Crv..rr•'l"l pt~s~ f'or pu.r~<-•M tA .S.<llf"lpll\j ~'ilenT,.
?v.r~c.. b~O\f\ o..l-l-z.1:5. P\Ar~~a v.loll .fo,. " to-f<'\1 ot 12 Mi'r11 .. d·-c:~
Pv.r~-c c:nd't:;J. o..(lJ SA1V1ple.S t:oii~Jd o..f 12.27. 1.0111.+<:r W"~ '(V1tJs-f!j cle-qr
L 1: tl-,:)It~ (), t 12:3\
TWN-04 01-14-2014 !Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
0
D
0
~
2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I ~~~ QW).ftc:.r N~,.+~ 'ZOJL/
See instruction
Location (well name): l._-ri....;...;.\t.'>...;.tJ __ .. O;:..· 7..;.._ _________ __,
Sampler Name
and initials: I ~D.nntr ijolliJ~/!8
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging ~..1 ....:\...;./...;.l~..:.~./_z_o_J;_'1 ____ __, and Sampling (if different) ~-.1 )l.!../_.;1.==:5v'~:.....:Z::::D:..:.l-~.Y _____ ___.
Well Purging Equip Used: [!)pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I &r u.fldfo:;,
Purging Method Used: cm:J2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I Qv..o.rtcrk /\') ~·h·Q\.+~ Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event l -('vJ!V .. 07R
pH Buffer 7.0 /.0 pH Buffer 4.0 Y.D
Specific Conductance ~..1 _4,_,1~j ____ _,l f!MHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): I las.oo
Depth to Water Before Purging I gb,ZO Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:I IJ , gg ,(.653h)
3" Well: () (.367h) 1-...::1~--.....J
Weather Cond. Ext'l Am b. Temp. ·c (prior sampling event) ._I ..;....1
11 __ _...
Time I '01 I I Gal. Purged I lb·.50 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I l1.3Co I pH I G.S'1 I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I 19.-z:c; I Temp. °C I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 13'3'1 I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 7-~ I Turbid~ly (NTU) I J
Time I 0721 r Gal. Purged I 0 I Time I 073::;2. I Gal. Purged I c I
Conductance I )? ... 10 I pH I G.i44 I Conductance I \-a.lz. I pH lb-55. I
Temp. oc I \3.SI I Temp. °C 11;,,57 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I If, :SO gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q , in gpm,
S/60 = I 1\ .o
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T = 2V /Q = I 2..1 ~ I
l l.Y3
117:0 .50
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labsl ~... A ..... W~.:.~.:.It.:;:L. _____ __J
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml 0 D HCL D D
Nutrients Ill 0 IOOml 0 00 H2S04 ~ D
H.euvy Metals D 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologies 0 D 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha D 0 l,OOOml 0 0 HN03 D D
Other (specify) w 0 Sample volume D ril 0 gj
Ch)oride If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth ~:....;~ 0;....;3:::;._. '2._0 ___ _, Sample Time
See instruction
Comment
Arr i\)~a. on Slte ,_+ 10 <X:, "'!Mn~r ,.,J ~rr :1'1 pr~e/\+ ~r F(j"E"· f"'r ae .b,zjt:\n a.+ }"6/0
f>v.r~-u.l 11-)~11 .for "' +ote..l of I t"'ll.rltA+~ ~.,a 30 s~c.on ds . P~r~e J well dr.~/·
'Pv.r~c -.:=nJ~a ~+ lOll. t.0t~~.+cr Wis I'VltA0j· L~f+-5.:.1+-c o.~.+ 101~
ArriiJe~ O(\ .sl+c: a..t-b7ZS ....,.-.. 111\U" N\~ CArrl'l rr~(.llt +6 coll~d-,SAI"'"Jples.. Slllmpl~~ b«/}ec:l
~+ 0730 L~fY ~rte g 0"1~3 De:~ -h l,..).l(h:r w~s q&,<f<.
TWN-07 01-14-2014 !Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I \ .ST Q v..~rter N ~ff"l'-. Tc. 2 0 I"'
See instruction
Location (well name): .._I -;-w-:...;....;...c...tJ_-_O_IJ_R..:.... ________ __,
Sampler Name
and initials: I '"i:nner Po Jl ,'J~:J hll
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I..__\.;.../1_'1~/_'Z._0.;...\'1-l-____ ~ and Sampling (if different) wii'I~/..L.;;4;......_ _______ ___,
Well Purging Equip Used: lt:J I pump or [ill bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 6-rvt~ J"fb~
Purging Method Used: [QJ2 casings (![13 casings
Sampling Event I Q_~f+~d~ N itrO£<_ Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event .... I~_W_JJ_-_o_z. ______ _,
pH Buffer 7.0 /,0 pH Buffer 4.0 y.o
Specific Conductance 1.___~_,_1_,1 ___ ___.1 [.lMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): ._I _o ____ ___,
Depth to Water Before Purging ._I ....;0:;..._ __ __. Casing Volume (V) 4" W~ll:t_C) ___ --1,(.653h)
3" Well.:. 0 . (.367h)
Weather Cond. Ext'l Am b. Temp. ·c (prior sampling event)'--1-_1_0
__ _,
Time I Of-\&C:. I Gal. Purged I \ 2_' I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I c.s I pH I s.'n I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I l l . \0 I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I oi~ I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I -z..:~ I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged \S.O gallon(s}
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I \\.0
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) lo
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I._A'-'.N---'-/t_L ______ ___,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients '£] 0 100 ml 0 m H2S04 ~ 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radio logies 0 0 250m! 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alph a 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) "El 0 Sample volume 0 "61 0 ~
Ghlet-',Je. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth ._I _0 ____ _, Sample Time
See instruction
Comment
An·;\)e~ on .s.i-h: "'1-014() --(~1'\er.-Q'\J. G-..,.rr-.. n '?1"~/lf .fOr R:l'\~t~. ~~n.s""+.e.. b~t?ln c1.:t OCJ'i,S
'Pv.""~~ SD (;.......1\oro J; ~ \V~1-er ~ 1oo Wlo/\~ o-F c:L. t.V01.-i-er.
~ ;(\S~ic e,Je~ a,J. Y.~ ~ollec,-lcJ ~-1-' oq57 L~ &rk ti\t 1ooo
TWN-07R 01-14-2014 lno not touch this ce11 (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill· Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2 ·Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I 1 ~1 Qv.a.r+er IU itrAfc zol'1
1 See instruction
Location (well name): ._II\--<-:W_JJ_--'-lg;;;...._ ________ __.
Sampler Name
and initials: ~~~~n~• H()Jhd.a;1/T.JI
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging '-1...;1.;.../.;...1 q..:.:./-='2!:>:::::...:..1Y.~..-____ ----J and Sampling (if different) ._l..v_//1 ________ ___.
Well Purging Equip Used: (][I pump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) lo...:(;.:.....;_ru'-fi...;;.J .... t_~~------'
Purging Method Used: [][12 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I G L,~ar"f~rk1 A.)iff"t~ Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event l._-rw __ JJ_-_0_Y ______ _,
pH Buffer 7.0 1.0 pH Buffer 4.0 Y.D
Specific Conductance ._I _ql-'q'-"q ___ ___.l J!MHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): I l!.j.5.0Z>
Depth to Water Before Purging I S.4 :z.o Casing Volume (V) 4'' w JJ.:I Sh ,OZ. ,(.653h)
3'1 Well:._. _o ___ __.. (.367h)
Weather Cond. Ext' I Am b. Temp. •c (prior sampling event)._l ='-o __ _,
Time I 1301 I Gal. Purged I ,, I Time 11~10 I Gal. Purged I J/D I
Conductance I '2.1" c; I pH I b.7r; I Conductance I Zl~j I pHI ~7£ I
Temp. °C I Fts\ I Temp. oc 1 \4.so I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I -z St::> I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I zs3 I
Turbidity (NTU) I 1Z9 I Turbidity (NTU) 11&3 I
Time I 1-:)IJ I Gal. Purged I IZ~I I Time ll31'Z I Gal. Purged llj< I
Conductance 12203 I pH I 6.7h I Conductance I ZZD'-t I pHI b:7t. I
Temp. oc I \Y.$2 I Temp. °C I \4.tt'l I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 'Z..Sl I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I "2.S \ I
Turbidity (NTU) I IKZ I Turbidity (NTU) I I~ I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I3Z gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I \)-0 T = 2V /Q = '----'-'"'-------'
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) ._I _o ___ .....
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated .__o ___ .....
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs AwAL
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100 ml D l.l9 H2S04 ~ 0
Heavy Metals D D 250m! D D HN03 D 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 D 250 ml D D No Preserv. D 0
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D 0
Other (specify) Ill 0 Sample volume D OD D Kl
G hlor;Je If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth 1-......=(;..:.._0 '-'".}5""'0 __ __, Sample Time !31Z
See instruction
Comment
TWN-18 01-14-2014 loa not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
DescriptionofSamplingEvent: I '.!.? Q"'o..rfer l:.'hloro~orf\11 "2-0I'-{
See instruction
Location (well name): Ll _-r..:_w_'l-1-=---Z-'2-'_::...o.:..____,....,.....,...---,,__----~
"TW'-\·22
Sampler Name
and initials: I '1:',..-cr J.f., !I.'J~Jm
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I VZ7/z/JIY. and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: (![]pump or [QJ bailer
Purging Method Used: [QJ2 casings [QJ3 casings
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I -G'f C.oiJ,·,~o~
c of\-til'lu..ov.s
Sampling Event I Qv..o.rhrE c \fllo('o:Fon'Y\ Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event Ll_-r~_w_L\_~_z_Y ______ _,
pH Buffer 7.0 7.D pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance Ll_'i_'I_1 ___ _,I!!MHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): I \1'3. 5D
Depth to Water Before Purging I 80. SO Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:l :Z..l.S'-1 1(.653h)
3" WeH:._. _o __ ____._ (.367h)
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling event)._! 7_0
__ __.
Time l llfDZ I Gal. Purged I 0 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I h 8~] I pH I £.6o I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. °C I I y.,'3o I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I z4g I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. °C I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ~ I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I ' £, .. D
Time to evacuate two ca iJlg volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated l o
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ~.-1 A_vJ_A_L_:__ _____ __,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
VOCs
Nutrients
Heavy Metals
All Other Non Radiologies
Gross Alpha
Other (specify)
C hlor·,Jc.
Final Depth I '0'1. 'l~
Comment
Ao-\~e~ of\ ~;1-~ ~t l~S8
Sct-mf'-es.. c.olled·~:J 0\.;.
y
E
-E
D
D
D
11;]
N specified below) y N y
D 3x40 ml D 'll HCL El
D 100 ml D JJ H2S04 E
D 250 ml D D HN03 D
D 250 ml D D No Preserv. D
D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D
D Sample volume D ~ D
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Sample Time J90~
See instruction
--G1111cr ;vJ. G-.a.r6(\ pres~ (I-f' -t" co llec..+-..Safl'lf )r=,S
!~0"3 Le.+l-_s)i--c tt.} JYQS
L.Jo-.+cr wo..s G1ea.r
TW4-22 01-27-2014 lDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
D
D
1!1
2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WlllTE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I 1 ~1" Q"'l).ff~,... Ch 1 .,,. o'forM 2.01 Y
' See instruction
Location (well name): ._I T\.)....:.....;~4....:.-_'Z'.-=--'4~---------.J
Sampler N arne
and initials: 4':..'1'11\u' ~o li;J~ fT1}
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purgingj'-_I_/...;Z...:.7.~.--/..::2'-0-'-14_,___ ____ -J and Sampling (if different) 1'-E-.;..,..J,~V.;.:A~--------1
Well Purging Equip Used: @]pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I C o'f\t in "'b ~..s.
Purging Method Used: [QJ2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I Qv.!l.<+-<..r 1~ G h lot ot~t"t") Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event ._l_-n_W_Y_-_2S ______ _.J
pH Buffer 7.0 -r.D pH Buffer 4.0 1-o\_l)
Specific Conductance L-1 __:'i...:.~....:..4 ___ ___JI~-tMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): I 11'2. SO
Depth to Water Before Purging I b Li.] l Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:l ~ \. 5"1 ,(.653h)
3" Well:,_ __ o ___ -J. 367h)
Weather Cond. Ext'l Am b. Temp. ·c (prior sampling eventliL.8:-." __ ___J
Time II3SY I Gal. Purged I 0 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I .sg~o I pH I b .Ja] I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. °C I \ J.i.J$1 I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 2!:g3 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I D I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I .., t·gg~~-I pH I : .... 4t'i-t \ I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. °C 1 -~ I Temp. °C I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ~~;_:. I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I ..::€!;;u I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s}
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q) in gpm.
S/60 = I 1%:~
Time to evacuate two cas ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) I o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated I o
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs A-WAL
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs Ell D 3x40 ml D [] HCL ~ D
Nutrients I] D lOOm! D ~ H2S04 fll D
Heavy Metals D D 250 ml D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250m) D 0 No Preserv. 0 D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D 0 HN03 0 D
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume D ~ D 0!1
Ch lof ;Jc. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth ._I _b _.;.8'...;.., s_-z. ___ _, Sample Time 1355
See instruction
Comment
Al"ri>Jt!J... on ~;·h:: "'.} ~~~~ -f,;(ln<.r ~,}. (1-,.r/"' pre.!:.efl-1 ...... ..Jo c;o}J~~-}--S-rMfl~s
So.Mfl-G~ con~c.+-ca o..t )35.5 L~fl-~)t( d\.} 135 7
0o-...+er w~ c.Jc.o--('
TW4-24 01-27-2014 lno.not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL [ See instruction
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: 11~-r O~o..f±e.r C.~)oro~rt'W"\ 'Z.OIL(
Location (well name): ~...1 -r\JJ-=-;:._YJ.--_2_5=-----------'
Sampler N arne
and initials: I -'f--.1111~,. HDH ,oJ~ lf8
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging ~-.-1 ~\ /;...;Z::::.I..:....;....I .::-z:._o...:...l'-i.:.__ ____ -J and Sampling (if different) ._I .v._..:...;vA-'-----------'
Well Purging Equip Used: (!!]pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I Lofltlnuou.~
Purging Method Used: [QJ2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I Qv..o..rtf!d~ C-'h lcrot~rf\'1 Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event 1~..._-rw __ '-i_-_0_~ _____ ___,
pH Buffer 7.0 1.0 pH Buffer 4.0 q.o
Specific Conductance ._I _4.:....:q'-q ____ ..... l~-tMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): I l3 Y. SD
Depth to Water Before Purging I 5.'f.g4 Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:' 4Kjl ,(.653h)
3" Well:. o (.367h) ..__ ___ ___,
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. ·c (prior sampling eventll._7;..0 __ __,
Time I \33/ I Gal. Purged I 6 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I 2qoo I pH I 6. IJ I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I )S..Jl! I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 1.67 I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I \ .. ~ I Tmbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. °C I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I Jg, 0
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 0 -I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) l o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated lo
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs '"'"I A-'-W:....:.A...:...;;;;L;...._ _____ _.
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs 'It] D 3x40 ml D 19 HCL PSI 0
Nutrients f] D 100 ml D f) H2S04 f) 0
Heavy Metals D D 250 ml D D HN03 D 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 D 250m! D D No Preset"V. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 0 0
Other (specify) ta 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0 ~
c. n lor 7Je If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth ._I 7..;...()_ • ....:11 ___ __. Sample Time
Comment 1
~ See instruction CC;Ij
Arr;\l~~ on ~;-}.,. 6..} 13~'4 -r;_11n..cr MA GIJ.lci, F"~ctrt -i-o
.S.~f''~ coll~ct~d d n~ L<ti-s8-c:. ~+ 134'2
(,J(A,t a w~
ConhnlAou.s
TW4-25 01-27-2014 jDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I 1 Sf" Qv.o......+~r C.\ot)or 0Po frY) "2.014
Location (well name): ._1-r_w_LJ_-_{)_o _________ __,
Sampler Name
and initials:
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I -z,/f./"2.0 1'1 and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: (IDpump or ~bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
~ See instruction
Purging Method Used: @]2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I Q\}.D:rfLrb\ ~hloroform Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event ~_l_""t""W __ 'i_-_0_8 _____ ---!
pH Buffer 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 4.0
Specific Conductance!.._ -~-~...;;..~· ___ _.h.tMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): I 0 .___ ____ ___.
Depth to Water Before Purging ._I _o ___ _, Casing Volume (V) 4" Wcll:~_o ___ -1,(.653h)
3" Well:_ o _(.367h)
Weather Con d. G\eo..r Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling event)l-j-z._D_· __ _J
Time I O~YLf I Gal. Purged I ?> I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I o.c::J I pH j 7.3'f I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc 113.13 I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I o'35 I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I D . { I Turbidily (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit -Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q in gpm.
S/60 = I {) Time to evacuate two ca ln2 volumes (2V)
T= 2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 0
Name of Ce1tified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs Ill 0 3x40 ml 0 ~ HCL Iii 0
Nutrients 111 0 lOOml 0 121 H2S04 ~ D
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml 0 0 HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 D
Gross A lpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 D HN03 D D
Other (specify) Ill 0 Sample volume 0 rn D 111
Ch lon'Ac If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth IL.--_b ___ ___J Sample Time
See instruction
Comment
D.I-6 )oJ\K
TW4-60 02-06-2014 lno not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I I E.T G)v.~r+-er 1\);fr,..fc:. '2.0/i.f
See instruction
Location (well name): I~.---1...:.....~W:.::..f.Jc...;._--=b::..;D=-. ________ _..
Sampler Name
and initials: ::=r:Mu Holl;J~;~
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging ._I ----"1 /'-1.-5""/2.=-0"'--/ ~'---------' and Sampling (if different) IIIlA
Well Purging Equip Used: OOpump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) AliA
Purging Method Used: [Qj2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I Gv.o.r+c:rl;:; .;\),'tf,.f<. Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event I TWI\}-03
pH Buffer 7.0 7,()
Specific Conductance 1~...---~..14_1.&...-__ __.1 ~MHOS/ em
Depth to Water Before Purging ._I ____;0;...._ __ -J
pH Buffer 4.0 q,o
Well Depth(O.Olft): 0
Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:~---=-b----11(.653h)
3" Well:. () .(.367h)
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling event)IL-'Z:::::..:._I' __ --1
Time I i5b54 I Gal. Purged I 6 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance 1 o.s I pH 1 S.lz I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc 115.3'7 I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I z'2, I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 1.5 I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2 -Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 0 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q). in gpm.
S/60 = I 0
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I t5 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 6
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 0
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ._I...~A~kJ_§_L ______ _..
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type or Sample if other I hun as Preservative Type
y N spccil'ied below) y N y N
VOCs D 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients [9 0 IOOml D ~ H2S04 1:?!1 D
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. D 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 D HN03 D 0
Other (specil'y) ~ D Sample volume D 1211 D ~
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth l.___o ____ _, Sample Time ()"700
See instruction
Comment
TWN-60 01-15-2014 lno not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I I!>T Qv.cJ.r-f-<:r AHt-rrAf-c. '2oJY
Location (well name): l~.--1i...:.::.W;;.:..tJ_ ... _65=----------'
Field Sample ID
Sampler N arne
and initials:
See instruction
Date and Time for Purging ._I ..;.;.1/_,J-=4/;_z_<>-'l_,_'t _____ _, and Sampling (if different) I tv/li ~~--------~
Well Purging Equip Used: [![]pump or (ID bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I G-ri.V\ll"~~ ~~~~;__--~~
Purging Method Used: 002 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I QV:Mfc:r~ ,..u;fr"f< Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event ._l_--r_w_JJ_-_o_1 ______ __.
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance L.l -~.:....;..:~ ____ _,~1~-tMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): ~....1 _1'Z__;S:;.;..7_0 ___ ._j
Depth to Water Before Purging I S0.'20 Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:' L\t30 ,(.653h)
3" Well: D (.367h) ....__ ___ ........
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling eventl~....l.s::...." __ ___,
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. °C I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 132 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I lL i5
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I g.4b I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ._I ..:..:/J:..;.k)=-J"'-'.;;..L _____ _,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients ~ D 100 ml D D!l H2S04 "S D
Heavy Metals D D 250 ml D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologies D D 250 ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) 00 D Sample volume D !ill D ~
G~lol";Jc If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth 1~_;::5::..;.1 :.._• ~:..;:'0:..__ _ _, Sample Time ._ll_Z_2....;7;__ __ ___J
See instruction
Comment
TWN-65 01-14-2014 !Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
TabC
Kriged Current Quarter Groundwater Contour Map, Capture Zone Map, Capture Zone Details Map, and
Weekly, Monthly and Quarterly Depth to Water Data
TIME
1309
1438
1456
1457
1443
1438
1445
1452
1453
1500
1426
1418
1306
1321
1442
1436
955
704
727
1433
1034
1030
1436
951
1002
1459
1443
1514
1456
NAME: Garrin Palmer, Tanner Holliday, Clayton Most
DATE: 3/27/2014
WELL Static level TIME WELL Static Level TIME WELL Static Level TIME WELL Static Level
MW-1 63.81 718 MW-4 70.42 1421 PIEZ-1 63.16 NA DR-1 ABANDON
MW-2 109.80 755 TW4-1 65.38 1237 PIEZ-2 33.62 NA DR-2 ABANDON
MW-3 82.67 759 TW4-2 65.80 1415 PIEZ-3 45.16
MW-3A 84.61 744 TW4-3 52.61 1508 PIEZ-4 51.81
MW-5 106.05 1050 TW4-4 69.38 1510 PIEZ-5 49.80 1232 DR-S 82.83
MW-11 86.40 739 TW4-5 61.26 1431 TWN-1 58.06 1229 DR-6 94.29
MW-12 108.20 804 TW4-6 69.13 702 TWN-2 28.90 1446 DR-7 92.10
MW-14 103.30 751 TW4-7 65.67 1224 TWN-3 36.50 1237 DR-8 51.02
MW-15 106.18 942 TW4-8 65.02 1230 TWN-4 50.02 1240 DR-9 86.25
MW-17 72.40 741 TW4-9 58.98 TWN-5 Abandon 1242 DR-10 77.91
MW-18 70.67 736 TW4-10 58.88 1423 TWN-6 76.44 1453 DR-11 98.20
MW-19 58.31 801 TW4-11 58.59 1428 TWN-7 86.41 1451 DR-12 90.08
MW-20 85.95 818 TW4-12 42.56 TWN-8 Abandon 1449 DR-13 69.55
MW-22 66.55 829 TW4-13 47.04 TWN-9 Abandon 1249 DR-14 76.08
MW-23 116.60 831 TW4-14 84.02 TWN-10 Abandon 1246 DR-15 92.65
MW-24 113.74 704 TW4-15 68.80 TWN-11 Abandon NA DR-16 ABANDON
MW-25 73.44 947 TW4-16 62.85 TWN-12 Abandon 1251 DR-17 64.62
MW-26 68.80 951 TW4-17 74.27 TWN-13 Abandon NA DR-18 ABANDON
MW-27 52.59 1204 TW4-18 62.02 1253 TWN-14 61.62 1254 DR-19 63.00
MW-28 75.59 700 TW4-19 66.28 TWN-15 Abandon 1256 DR-20 55.02
MW-29 100.98 712 TW4-20 67.36 1259 TWN-16 46.99 1303 DR-21 100.98
MW-30 74.73 1208 TW4-21 63.34 TWN-17 Abandon 1315 DR-22 DRY
MW-31 67.45 709 TW4-22 59.64 1218 TWN-18 58.58 1300 DR-23 70.30
MW-32 74.27 807 TW4-23 65.02 1150 TWN-19 52.48 1313 DR-24 43.80
MW-33 DRY 708 TW4-24 65.50 NA DR-25 ABANDON
MW-34 107.79 710 TW4-25 60.12
MW-35 112.22 811 TW4-26 63.15
MW-36 110.50 929 TW4-27 80.39
MW-37 113.85 821 TW4-28 37.17
838 TW4-29 71.72
843 TW4-30 76.83
919 TW4-31 82.33
823 TW4-32 48.60
840 TW4-33 70.24
835 TW4-34 69.45
Weekly Inspection Form
Svstem Ocerational (If no note
Time Well Deoth* Comments any problems/c..orrective actions)
I Li3 3. MW-4 ._b_g .51 Flow L.l. ~ 6-P.J-1\ d_es)No
Meter 2776){'1...01 (YeS) No
"
/L.J2q MW-26 AR-_'15 Flow 10.1 &PM (fei)No
Met.er 3&7g't 35.5Z ~No
~ TW4-19 {Z.,g5 Flow i Li .o &P..M.. (Yes) No
Meter Zoo. ' 7 71 .. o_c>-(Ye§J No
I~ z..s· TW4-20 A5 zo Flow q_5 G·()M (Y~ No
Meter ,.<'i2\Z.S.zz. ~ No
I 1-j .> {; TW4-4 £'1 fo Flow 8 .o ,;.p ,.v\ (~ No
Meter 25i'IDY~ l.IO (Ye5_ No
l LH4 TWN-2 2.6.00 Flow I ~.5 L~PJA {f_e~ No
Meter I SS30 '-10 • /.o eYe§) No
J ~Zl TW4-22 f. 4.1 ~ Flow i 8. a &~ J.l'-(Yej No
Meter q 41-{()i.j l-~0 (Ye~ No
1'11~ TW4-24 6_Q -~!? Flow I ~-c.:' &P/IA.. (YeS) No
Meter t;?7 JD{-.,'3 z.n (Ye"$\ No
-~
I L.fl() TW4-25 _t;q . .55 Flow !7.f! &P_A (Yes ) No
Meter "'2 7q3q. 70 CY~ No
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): --------------
( * Depth is measured to the nearest O.Oi feet.
Monthly Depth Check Form
Date t J c,/ Zot '1 Name G~r,.;..-... Pc..( ....v-.e.r, L.lo.;t foA-.¢Ap~f-
Time Well Depth* Time Well Depth*
\0: d.';}. MW-4 (pq ,q lt Qq. sea TWN-1 61--(."!
1o·,l(.) TW4-1 (all .'\1 to.o5 TWN~2 ~9 -~0
lQ'· ~'-{ TW4-2 G,S .S~ Q:i:l1b TWN-3 :l!o -~0
lo·-\1 TW4-3 sa.LJ t oq ·.4.S TWN-4 '-{C\.1-~
1o: l'J TW4-4 ~?? -4~ o'\· t>S TWN~7 SL!-1-t
\Q·li..J, TW4-5 ~0 . i-0 o~f,\.10 TWN-18 ss.~a~
to:~ l-TW4-6 (oq ,·J._~ ~~·.Lit MW-27 6~ (n~
lO-ll TW4-7 (a f:>. 5~ I 31.J'l. MW-30 76. Y.O
\Q :1:} TW4-8 (a·l? ./1-10'-4i MW-31 Ca. "'lr . s6
1o.15 TW4-9 n~·Ya t2:ll TW4-28 31.00
IQ -I\ TW4-10 5~·50 \'b:J-:1 TW4-29 -~\ .~y
(0. ~(o TW4-11 Ei8 ·YO '~·33 TW4-30 "\-':\.1)
13', d..o TW4-12 (\a :~o \3-'3>:i TW4-31 «3-;A. ~ 0
1::,.1 s TW4-13 Lll-'. I 5 13.?.~ TW4-32 ~S~I
I~; d,(g TW4-14 SY·~f2 l3. a10 TW4-33 -=l-0 .35
jo.oq TW4~15 (a6.1o 13;~\ TW4-34 CO'\ . L-\~
!a.~ B TW4-16 (g 1.4'1,
/0 ··2ll TW4-17 J Y • '3o
}0-.DO TW4-18 (Lli · f2u
ljo~ TW4-19 .2~ .. 5~
lb.o~ TW4-20 l-J,.~S
lQ :o '1.. TW4-21 (o \. ~Co
ID'·Ol TW4-22 5~ ,(o l-
,..,~ 'D ··~-TW4-23 (o!..l .f)S
\D-Q":\ TW4-24 l.oCn . ') ~
IQ:oS TW4-25 •;Ct .g (o
!Q.~6 TW4-26 y 3.10
1~-d-.6 TW4-27 so. so
Comments: {Please note the well number for any comments)
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet
Weekly Inspection Form
System Operational (If no note
1me Wll e D h e_pt * c omments st ) an~ 12robtem corrective actions
IOl-!3 MW-4 t£g,75 Flow 4.4 &J?_,!A. {Ye~ No
Meter 2.~zgzz.. z.J; Cfe~ No
\03Cf MW-26 gg_35 Flow I a -z_ G~#\. ~S) No
Met.er 3Sql97. qg C_Ye] No
~~ -·~ TW4-19 7 l . LiD Flow it...\.0 6-PM ~No
""" Meter t:.D .s ~ 6 ~ 'i' . .3D ~No
.......
lo'l,Lo{ TW4-20 67.6() Flow l:!.9' (, (J A.A. ('Yes) No
Meter 6'i3681 "3 7 (res) No
lo '-!£. TW4-4 70.!0 Flow ?3. -z. 6-P ,AA. (Yes) No
Meter 2.564~1.10 (Yes _No -
( Jo2. 7 TWN-2 2<J. to Flow IS.o (,...p,.v. (j_~e§L No
Meter 187 l. S2. '-15 &es~)\Jo
J (J '3'-1 TW4-22 .51. 6' z_ Flow 17.f:J c-P.fA ~No
Meter 'll238.~o @No
ln'7.i TW4-24 ?II .7~ Flow 1~.1 6-l':l;V\, C{e)) No
Meter >{973 \?., 4 n -~-No
1023 TW4-25 {.o.qo Flow 17. 'i &lA (yes} No
Meter 53~IO'L7C ~Yes} No -
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ---------------
(
" Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
Date t/ z.o {1 1 Name g. .... ,.,.,..... e~b:z&r I ........... s-r tipllj4e.y
System Operational (If no note
T' 1me Wll e 0 h* e_g_t c omments anl£ Qro bl I . . ) ems corrective act1ons
J 1-Zo MW-4 7f. 'ZD Flow LJ.4 G-f?M (fes)No
Meter 2BB'S Z4. ZS' ((e"Sj No
_-.,
l"l15 MW-26 6".5.'11 Flow !O.D &P;.A (Ye~ No
Met.er 3'115lZ.76 (Yes)No
IJlO TW4-19 .5S-~6 Flow J ~oto CrP.M. ff_e§> No
Meter 2o'14.7/6.oo cfe~ No
TW4-20 ..< L1' J 'l Flow C(. 7 GPA ~ No
Meter 61.Sl7o. ~<: ~ No
17U TW4-4 /o. tv Flow 8 . o tr-r.M. ~No
Meter ZbiZ 7Z.tla _rf_es) No
IZDI TWN-2 2&.52.. Flow IS'. D &"~ <fe() No
Meter 1q1'-l IZ. Yo eYe§) No
I z..o8 TW4-22 _sq_t,~ Flow i 8 D ?PM (YeS] No
Meter qgzsg. 7o (Ye§) No
I 210 TW4-24 A.K.os Flow 19 • I &-t1.M. (19j) No
Meter ql63l1 qo (fji) No
1!.57 TW4-25 5'l. -zo Flow l ~. 2-&f'A _t{e~ No
Meter 54~1.{71. 7o (_ Y e..S::~ No
Operational Problems (Please list well number): p0 ,.,J,.,.. ±9 T~W-4-15 ;s off b,H .... .ss. ..,.,..,~ .... l-V-A"M<..
is rc.el.u .• "6 See<v+s Pow.:.r-yjll PL. ±yr .... ~ bALk. A+ bc..forc. war:b ky '-' Cl!><..l'" • .y .. +-... J,.Ic.
ts> ad flo,) re,Jo~, '-'!1\ L.l-c.4f. ,..J(...e.-... jj?p-dcr-t,l bee-~ &A,
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): Po'-''-r w ... .s b.v,t.. 9 .-q,. 1 wa . ~e..........,t,e. 1-.:.el
\.A-Cf(.-f-+•e..... e-t +bei FM.?
• Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
Date d11J, ..
Time Well Depth* Comments
l"fU' MW-4
J&{<&D MW-26 ~---A~ Flow ••·• .... .Mt.
Met.er 3._~2.1• .. 94
l3lO TW4-19 l«.?'t Flow 114 •00
Meter -u~ro"'G. oo
1-..1'l. TW4-20 &If.~~ Flow 10 '2. ~~
Meter &ll~t~2_._-,
-, .. !3 TW4-4 S4.4_1 Flow -,.,_ U.M
Meter L£tr'tz~ _It
J~114 TWN-2 z.~e_s Flow 11.• ~
Meter ,4~t.o~ .!I&
1 -...,~ TW4-22 sr~ ~ Flow l!l.o '-""""
Meter ,b6 at.c. .,.,
'~"' TW4-24 -'"·" Flow 1t.t &PA.
Meter lf!st t."7. ,8
tl3f TW4-25 51 .• ._ Flow 17•1 /J~
Meter ~ilri2.H
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Svstem Operational (If no note
any problems/corrective acttons)
~No
~ No
cb.) No
ifj) No
(fe} No
(fe§) No
~No
6e} No
@No
~_)No
~ No
(Ye~) No
l"Y~ No
(iej) No
~No
~No
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ---------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
( Date 2/a/zo,1
System Operational (If no note
Ti a me Wll e D th* ep: c omments bl I an:l ero ems corrective actions}
1'-i.So.\ MW-4 /t...t .ez Flow 4 4 ~P./V\ (YeS)-No
Meter 2'1q51(') q3 ~No
I Y.>l MW-26 (.~:,. c.{0 Flow I c; u t ·P.N\. (Yei) No
Met.er 3'156 16 sg ~No
l4W TW4-19 6g_74 Flow 14.00 GP.M ·-<'ies) No
Meter 2cq5'17../.na ~No
I ~.iLl~ TW4-20 ..< ~. 2.S Flow tD r') kP;V\. rfe$) No
Meter l},gi~-:? 1<-t ~No
I '1~~· TW4-4 /0.10 Flow ~.{') 6-£2.M. rYeS) No
Meter 2. 70ActO 10 eYe~ No
I '-\3, TWN-2 Z6 .r) 2.. Flow ~~-I &P.I"" (Ye~ No
Meter 1qqnq4 .. 'V.J Cf.Jd No
J 'iY5 TW4-22 SCJ 1, ~ Flow I S.o.\ G-PM r1e8"\No
-..: Meter \0211'""' (() (Yes)No
I '-t L.ll TW4-24 K7-55 Flow ~~-/) &~M (('"~ No
Meter 4 (i.;:-o'-1 1n ~No
1432.. TW4-25 l\q_L\', Flow ~~.t. r, rA C"'YeS) No
Meter 56q022 DO ~No
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number}: ---------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
/
Weekly Inspection Form
( Date •bel '"
System Operational (If no note
T' •me Wit e D th* eJ)1 c t ommen s bl sf I i ) an3£ era em correct ve act ons
.\'2.10 MW-4 7'-l. 6-5 Flow 4.4 GoP~ cVeSJ No
Meter .3'ol1q .. ,u. ~4 ~v No
1 z.v? MW-26 66.5o Flow 10 5 &PA <fehl No
Met,er .H7 '{ ·z5, n ~No
IZ~Z.. TW4-19 6& 4Li Flow 1~.7 6P~ @No
Meter 21ZI'i73 .oo (fe's) No
12o'-l TW4-20 64.f .73 Flow 'L' ~P.M. (fes) No
Meter 61'1531. zo «ii) No
I?..IZ.. TW4-4 79. LiZ. Flow ~to 6-P..v\. (Y~ No
Meter 275Z Zb. 70 ~No
----::-
( liS "I TWN-2 Zl..I,O Flow I S.Z. &P.M. (j_~ No
Meter Z.o 27 3b. YO ~No
rzoc TW4-22 .lJ.. .56 ..£; Flow iS.!.\ &PM f{e~ No
Meter 103~ Z3 bO ~No
_.,...,
liS{ TW4-24 _6_"'1 .91 Flow Jgl h:Pfo (vev No
Meter t1.7J2\~.w (Yes) No
ll§O TW4-25 .5c1.JO Flow 17. S t:.PM (VeS') No
Meter 5 7QO'\D. 10 ~No
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ---------------
( * Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
(
(
Weekly Inspection Form
Time Well Deoth* Comments
IZI6 MW-4 7 g . zo Flow 4 A Gf>,A-'\
Meter 31D53q .\ 4
1z.r.3 MW-26 £6. z7 Flow IS. , t;:l)t-1
Met.er 3q ss 4 'f. 37
_LZ.3'{ TW4-19 6 Z 3o Flow \ {.5 £,PM.
Meter '21336 1~ .oo
t7.ro TW4-20 6'-t.L\o Flow Cf,g G PM\
Meter 6l10i3 '"
1z.1q TW4-4 6&'.~_1{ Flow 7.if bf'.M..
Meter 28oo31.7o
1158 TWN-2 27.o3 Flow 1t.t 6PM
Meter zo6z.D4 6o
12a6 TW4-22 .5'1. 72. Flow IS '--\ G-P..-v\
Meter 1 osB ZG. 30
, -z.o.3 TW4-24 6 1. ss Flow 1 7. g G-P..AA.
Meter 'HlR7,(5_ or')
1 t.St) TW4-25 t.; 'L 31.. Flow 1g-,0 GPI-"\
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
a/(61 1 '1 f'u II ul fY""' f· .,J Pee h;
System Operational (If no note
anv problems/corrective at?tlons}
{Y'"eS} No
~ No -.....
(Yes ') No
<feS] No
L__.YesJJo ...._ ~
(Y6S )NO
(j__es) No
de$ No
("19$) No
~No
(Je~ No
~No
LYJW No
C{_~ No
tfe~ No
{Ye~ No
CYe§ No
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): z /1 sll=1 ?111\wl. pqM.f c0=:o\ cc.fiA.feeL
fv""-f W .d h.H· .... ,t, l:,,g )'-P"'-tS..t \030 eo Z ft i'fl !.(.
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
Name ~f\er ~ , GtJ..r r/tt F
I
Svstem Ocerational (If no note
Time Well Depth1! Comments anv problems/corrective actions)
l~Y5 MW-4 (;, 8. b~ Flow '1.3 ('Yes }Jo
Meter 315161. 5< (Yes) No
143-z.. MW-26 b~IS Flow 10) ~No
Met.er YD07D7.7l Cve~ No
JSDO TW4-19 (/1, 18 Flow 17.3 (YeS) No
Meter 1.1 Sb'-t 20 .o 2.. ~No
1429 TW4-20 ~5 .12. Flow -6 iO.O @~No
Meter c.zz.5% .. S4 des No
) ~ Lf'l TW4-4 C.'l5S Flow ~.D (-Ye~No
Meter 281.\~\-z. '-\ (Yes Ji10
l't /6 TWN-2 2.C::..C(b Flow 13·3 {Ye§J No
Meter 'Z.!03Z..I.~ @s No
H~ TW4-22 f;;.?...\6 Flow 13.~ ( )'es) No
Meter (0777<6. o 6e.S No
(jZ3 TW4-24 bg.DCJ Flow 11K (Ye~ No
Meter 10060£7. o C.....Yej No
]YI5 TW4-25 ~ "t,'SS Flow 17,0 CrP? ~No
Meter S89'31J .~ (~ No
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): --------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
(
Date
Monthly Depth Chevorm
Q -d 8 -lj Name \ o.t'M.r H. C lo.:;}on ;t1.
Time Well Depth* Time Well Depth*
0~:51-MW-4 -=to .t tf oe:.lo TWN-1 ~3 -9~ ag·.ss TW4-1 !i! Ce.S. zn oP>. ! ~ TWN-2 21 . 3'-/
0€,'.6B TW4-2 GCo .oo ~~.l~ TWN-3 .30.020
o~'-S:l TW4-3 FJ :i -GI~ o~.-ao TWN-4 5Q . l\
oq·.od.. TW4-4 Co~.G~ <2 B: J,i. TWN-7 fJ(g.sg
o«(): ~-l '\ TW4-5 Q)O, '1 G 0~ d-J._ TWN-18 5 8 -55
O:r.o3 TW4-6 Co5 .4.Co (2~· ~s MW-27 5~-~b
oe~s<O TW4-7 65. BLf 0~ 4'1 MW-30 ~5.05
cs·. s 4 TW4-8 '5 d.Cf Cf??_ '-\J-. MW-31 (2 .s s
0<6'·51 TW4-9 661-0 oq.· n TW4-28 3t -~l-
or;·.~+ TW4-10 f?b.1l9 DCC-l~ TW4-29 -=rl. '1o
oC1:o1 TW4-11 58.~5 oC{: ')3 TW4-30 1-':J .D'l
Q_q:to TW4-12 t-13 'G?3 ~.as TW4-31 aa. i-J.
oct.to TW4-13 L(l-.J.~ o~: 13 TW4-32 <1~.6.8
ncr. ILo TW4-14 '84 . 15 09·J.i-TW4-33 :to.L-f~
ae .3:+ TW4-15 ~ -=t .+a o'i d.l TW4-34 Csz..-S .~LJ
·oCC? ~ 2> <3 TW4-16 CD~. ~o
o~~ yo TW4-17 "1 <..\.4S
Qf:':l I?. TW4-18 r;, \'. 60
09Z8 TW4-19 67.SS
o~--~s TW4-20 (95 (J ~
(£". 1'1 TW4-21 CD2. JG
Qf?J :3 '1 TW4-22 eao.~~
69:0~ TW4-23 G5. o5
Q~;:33 TW4-24 Ca "1 .j l-
00-~ TW4-25 w.Dt
<)CC otD TW4-26 G 3-. 'J. b
o~-.t~ TW4-27 80·-~D
Comments: (Please note the well number for any comments)
(_
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet I
Weekly Inspection Form
Name ~""r H.n:dzj
System Operational (If no note
Time Wei D~pth* Comments anv nroblems/corrective actions)
l2.5b MW-4 G.9.S1 Flow L.\3 MM CYes JNo
Meter 3~1~ 67.51' CYe~ No
l'Z--!:V MW-26 "'"-·0 0 Flow 10,0 &PM ~S\No
I rz.S3. Met.er yozz. tt6,o 8 rYes) No
1~15 TW4-19 '7zJ~,s Flow 1g.o trPK (Y~s f5!o
Meter ~ :z1sgsgz.o~ Cres~o
/2i..\q TW4-20 ~s .-=ss Flow 9 .s &PM ( Yes) No
Meter 6z.·:Y=f'3S,~q {Yes) No
('~c:V TW4-4 70 .OZ-Flow 7.~ Gv~ (Yes )No
Meter ztH04~.s (Ye} No
_L--...,.
iZ..~O TWN-2 "Z.J?. ,7;< Flow /~.f, &PI'\ 7_Xe~o
' Meter z..111 '6~:3 ( Yes _)Jo
"" ~
1'2..1..\"1 TW4-22 1:.'1.9/ Flow 15. ~ G-f'l{ rves }No
Meter [D9f.L{'Z.,:3 ( Yes )No
IZ.L{~ TW4-24 C:,7,U..D Flow i~b &PM (Yes~No
Meter 10'2.2(;3(;,. I -(_v~No
--=-
12. ?::b TW4-25 6&..90 Flow I (. , 7 &fl'-\ C:v~No
Meter '-.Oq3Lj),k. cves.JNo
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): --------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
System Operational (If no note r· rme W II e D h* e_pt c omments t an~ ~roblems~ corrective actions}
13Z<is' MW-4 7D-3?_ Flow 4.1-\ (;P..N\ (Yes) No
Meter ~ Z~S"ID. I Z. {YeS) No
----......
1324 MW-26 67.o-z.._ Flow IC>.S t;..PfoA... (YeSJ No
Met.er '-l 0 L{_1 ~6 .l:'Z (res) No
~~~g TW4-19 (., 8, '-I I Flow i ~ _s t-f .)A._ {Yes') No
Meter ~2..1 't4e?Loc ~No
I ~Z.I TW4~20 b5..7:3;, Flow q_g G-P-"""-?feS\No
Meter 6l.5'i77. 8'-1. ~es) No
133 L{_ TW4~4 f)Cf .'-Jk Flow 7 . z_ 6P~ ~No
Meter Z.'l37g7. 40 ~-No
I :::SO$ TWN~2 '27 -6g Flow lS.7 &PM (YeS\ No
Meter z.ng-q·-L~o ( Ye~ No
'"
I::> l6 TW4~22 .5~.LJB' Flow 17.8' &Pr-'\ C(e~ No
Meter II\ Z..31.go {Yes) No
I :J t "L TW4-24 ~D-I~ Flow q o &PM ~No
Meter ID3'i 1/55 () ~No
1305 TW4~25 61. <60 Flow uL6 r;~M {Ye~ No
Meter 61Cf3o··z_Jo {_Yes·_)Jo
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ---------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
(
Weekly Inspection Form
System Operational (If no note
Tl me W II e D h* eot c omments I t anY: ~rob ems corrective actions}
\2.13 MW-4 /..7.50 Flow 4.4 ~P.M ~No
Meter 33251.1.ol!i @§) No
IZ15 MW-26 65.to Flow 10.5 &-PM 6S::> No
Met.er ~D~(,~, lo('i @)No
1210 TW4-19 ~s 14 Flow (g.D /".,.PM Nev No
Meter _ 2 2.__Li_23.3J. DO (1e~ No
t2o'l TW4-20 5q.~o Flow I o .t~ t.d./oA ~ No
Meter A-Z.t'f(('-4 :n ~ No
\218 TW4-4 6'l. L{_o Flow /. ~ G-PA @w No
Meter Z%'5'10 'Z..O 6.0 No
ll57 TWN-2 '2.?.60 Flow lS?-~ 611'~ 6e~No
'· Meter 'Z Z2c>J7_'-'to Cie~ No
lUu~ TW4-22 S'l. 23 Flow l_g-l (A'/--'\ CYeiD No
Meter \\31'-'14.1..-\0 Cfe?) No
l'to3 TW4-24 66,G6 Flow \7-4 6-f'..M Ci.eSt:J No
Meter lo.5g'Z74.2D (Ye~ No
1153 TW4-25 5'L36 Flow I !l ._1 _6-f.LA_ feD No
Meter 63067q ~0 ~e_I) No
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ---------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
('-
Weekly Inspection Form
(
System Operational (If no note
Time Well Depth* Comments any stroblems/corrective ·actions\
L-?.23 MW-4 70.~q Flow I.J.t.( t;:P.M.. (Ye~l)No
Meter 3$7'2.02 > 35 (Yes) No
_.........._
~3Z.O MW-26 6~-12 Flow I0-5 CPA Cves':No
Me\er Lto167'-l. Yo _(Ye5::J No
13Lt2. TW4-19 hL{. JO Flow j_K, I &PJA (YeS) No
Meter zzS"~D 1.\o. oo (Yes)No
1:311 TW4-20 6 ~. qC> Flow q.o 6-f'M eYe~ No
Meter ~2~17Z.Si./ CieS) No
1:3'Z7 TW4-4 6q._!lg Flow -S:r::l'0 GP;.A.. rfe~ No
Meter ,3o:Z'1'{.3, qo ~No
J3o.5' TWN-2 2.S.Jq Flow H5.7 6-PM <Ye:D No
Meter 2'2.5ZZ 7_ 'JD ~No
l31J TW4-22 .59. 6·o Flow 17.6 CPA (Y~ No
Meter i 1.'\0 ~-4 (.) (Ye~' No
130'\ TW4-24 67.45 Flow IS.o G-P~ ~No
Meter i 0 l'!.b3'l I\ (Ye~ No -
1301 TW4-25 62.5o Flow ,g_6 G-ffo'\-(Yej) No
Meter _h 3'Wl. so {Yes~ No -
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ---------------
" Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
Date Name
(
System Operational (If no note
Time Well De_pth* Comments anv oroblemslcorrectlve actions)
\'-{1"{ MW-4 611 . I~ Flow Ll. '-l (,... I? .A.A. ( Ye~ No
Meter 3Y'Z7t6·. 31 (Yes) No
I '-ill MW-26 6'7-l't Flow 10.5 6-P....v\ eYe~ No
Met.er 4"'17'1-i. "0 (fe]) No
14S!f TW4-19 t\~.yz_ Flow I !? • l erP..u\ (Yej) No
Meter Z.Z.7'H 40f.oo (Yes) No -
J Yo6 TW4-20 7&'.40 Flow q_ I G-P.,.v\ Lfe~ No
Meter 6''2-"16 8''?, ol:. ~No
I YLS TW4-4 7o.l--t Flow S.o G-f.u-.. ({eV No
Meter 3o lo6 z . to fieiJ No
l3.S.'-l TWN-2 ""2$. 00 Flow I Y' 6 6--Pfi.'\ de.iJ No
Meter 22.8<i~li .5o cres) No
i L-\ o3 TW4-22 82.25 Flow lS'. u ("Ji'..N\ ~)No
Meter l\ I l._/l._bg (Je§) No
ll5'"1 TW4-24 6g .\0 Flow 18 .7 GflA d~ No
Meter IOt;SCf'674 60 (reS) No
\352.. TW4-25 t;o.z~ Flow \ &.o GPA ~e~) No
Meter t;Lllfor6. Cjo (!{es No
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ---------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 teet.
( .....
@ estimated dry area
MW-S perched monitoring well showing e 1;)503 elevation in feet amsl
TW04-12 temporary perched monitoring well
5582 showing elevation in feet amsl
TWN-7 h d . . . <>~563 temporary perc e mtrate momtonng 0 well showing elevation in feet amsl
PIEZ-1 perched piezometer showing
COl 5592 elevation in feet amsl
TW4-32 temporary perched monitoring well
~ 5563 installed September, 2013 showing
elevation in feet amsl
RUIN SPRING b 5380 seep or spring showing
elevation in feet amsl
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
KRIGED 1st QUARTER, 2014 WATER LEVELS
WHITE MESA SITE
/IPPROVED DATE REFERENCE FIGURE
H:/718000/may14/Uwl0314.srf I C-1
estimated nitrate capture
zone boundary stream tubes
resulting from pumping
estimated chloroform capture
zone boundary stream tubes
resulting from pumping
@ estimated dry area
MW-5 perched monitoring well showing e ssos elevation in feet amsl
TW4-12 . . I temporary perehed mon1tonng wei 0 5582 showing elevation In feel amsl
TWN-7 hed .1 .1 . .A5563 temporary perc n1 rate mom onng
V well showing elevation in feet amsl
PIEZ-1 perched piezometer showing
Q 5592 elevation in feet amsl,
TW~2 temporary perehed monitoring well
*5563 iristglledSeptembe.r, 201:3 showing
elevati:on In feet amsl
RUIN SPRING b 5380 seep or spring showing
elevation in feet amsl
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM, INC.
APPROVED
KRIGED 1st QUARTER, 2014 WATER LEVELS
AND ESTIMATED CAPTURE ZONES
WHITE MESA SITE
DATE REFERENCE H:/718000/may14/
nitrate/Uwl0314cz2.srf
FIGURE
C-2
,. ,,"'
' ,
MW-4
.5551
TW4-1
0 5553
PIEZ-2
<;l 5595
TW4-32
~5563
estimated nitrate capture
zone boundary stream tubes
resulting from pumping
estimated chloroform capture
zone boundary stream tubes
resulting from pumping
perched monitoring well showing
elevation in feet amsl
temporary perched monitoring well
showing elevation in feet amsl
perched piezometer showing
elevation in feet amsl
temporary perched monitoring well
installed September, 2013 showing
elevation in feet amsl
~ ~ ~
5540
5535
NOTE: MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19, and TW4-20 are chloroform pumping wells;
TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 are nitrate pumping wells
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM, INC.
APPROVED
KRIGED 1st QUARTER, 2014 WATER LEVELS
AND ESTIMATED CAPTURE ZONES
WHITE MESA SITE
DATE H:/718000/
mav14/nitrate/U0314cznt.srf
FIGURE
C-3
TabD
Kriged Previous Quarter Groundwater Contour Map
@ estimated dry area
MW·5 perched monitoring well showing e 5503 elevation in feet amsl
TW04-12' temporary perched monitoring well
5582 showing elevation in feet amsl
T~~562 temporary perched nitrate monitoring
V well showing elevation in feet amsl
PIEZ-1 perched piezometer showing
Q 5592 elevation in feet amsl
TW4·32 tal'npGrary perched monitoring well
~ 5564 Installed September,> 2013 showing
approximate elevation in feet arnsl
RUIN SPRING b 5380 seep or spring showing
elevation in feet amsl
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
KRIGED 4th QUARTER, 2013 WATER LEVELS
WHITE MESA SITE
1\PPROVED DATE REFERENCE FIGURE
H :/718000/feb 14/Uwl 1213.srf D-1
TabE
Hydrographs of Groundwater Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
-a.
E -.c
= -C1)
E
i=
a.. C1) > 0
C1) > C1)
..J
a.. C1) -~ ._
I z ~
8~/v~/BO
C:~/~0/vO
0~/B~/~ ~
60/90/LO
80/C:C:/C:O
-
.
0 c) 0 c)
T""'"
0 c)
C\J
0 c)
(t)
0 c)
'<t
1
~
~
~
~
0 c)
U")
t
•
0 c)
<0
-c.
E
.c
= -C1)
E ;::
a.. C1) > 0
C1) > C1)
..J
a..
C1) -~
N I z ~
8~/17~/80
c~/~0/170
0~/8~H ~
60/90/LO
80/cc/cO
0 0 0 0
{
/
~
~
I
~~
' 0 0 C\J
' ~
~
~ /
q
lO C\J
0
0 (')
8 ~/t>~/80
-a.
E
.c
.,; --c~/~0/vO Cl) .
E
i= ...
Cl) > 0
Cl) > Cl)
..J ...
Cl) 0 ~/8 ~/ ~ ~ -~
C")
I z
3: 1-
60/90/LO
80/GZ/ZO
0
ci
q
lO
0 ci 0 ui
'
0
ci C\1
q
lO C\1
~
~
~
~
~
J
0
ci (")
(·u) ~U!Od 6u!Jnseaw MOias l,ndaa
)
~
~
~
I
0 ci '<:!"
-Q.
E :c
= -C1)
E
i=
a.. C1) > 0
Q) > C1)
..J
a..
C1) -~
'll:t I z ~
£ ~/17 ~/80
G~/~0/170
0 ~/8 ~~~ ~
60!90/LO
80/GG/GO
'
0 ci 0 ci C\1
0 ci C")
v
1
~
\ •
0
ci '<t
0
ci L()
0
ci c.o
-...! -...! 0
-...! Cf)
(n
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
-...! Cf)
0
-...! 01 (n
-...! 01 0
-...! .j:>.
(n
-...! .j:>.
0
1-----t-------t------j-----j----r-------t 12/18/08
07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/11
• 04/01/12
10/18/12
-05/06/13
11/22/13
-06/10/14
L_ ___ _j_ ___ _j_ ___ ---L;_ ___ -~.. ___ ___. ___ ____._ 12/27/14
~ z I 0)
~ -CD -.:
r-CD < ~
0
Ci -.:
::!
3 CD -= .
C"
3
"'C -
<D (X)
0
....
<D CJ)
0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
<D .j>.
0
I
<D !" 0
<D 0
0
\
)
)
(
~
~
(X)
(X)
0
~\
t
·~
(X)
CJ)
0
'
(X)
.j>.
0
12/18/08
07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/11
04/01/12
10/18/12
05/06/13
11/22/13
06/10/14
12/27/14
~ z I .......,
::e a <D ""'l
r-<D < <D
0 < <D ""'l
::!
3 <D ---.
C" -3
"C -
v~Jo ~190
~
-8 ~/90/90 c.
E
.c
= -Q) C::~/B~/0~ E .
i=
I.. Q) > 0 C::~/~0/170 .
Q) > Q)
....1
I.. Q) -~ ~/v ~/60 ~
"''l:t
T"" I z ~ ~ ~/9<::/C::O
0~/0~/BO .
0~/C::C::HO
60/90/LO
(!) ,_.
(!)
r---r---_ ~ ~ K "'
\ ~ )
~
\ ~~
v ~ ~ r---.
C\1 ct)
(!)
~ (!)
"' ~ 0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
~ 00 "'
~ 00 0
~ ---J "'
~ :--1 0
~ 0')
"' l------t-----;-----+------+----l-----ro7/o6/09
01/22/10
.. 08/10/10
-02/26/11
09/14/11
04/01/12
•10/18/12
. 05/06/13
11/22/13
06/10/14
'-----'-------"-----'-----'-------~-------1.. 12/27/14
~ z I .......
0)
~ -(1)
""' r (1) < (1)
0 < (1)
""' ::t
3
(1) -== C" -3
"C -
-..,J
0 0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
0) 0 0
(]1
9 0
._____
~ ~~
~
~ 9 0
~~ r-----t:::. .---~
~
~
~
I~
•
w 0 0
1\)
0 0
.....
0 0
-
9 0
07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11 ~ z I ...... co
09/14/11 ~ -CD ""' r CD < !. 04/01/12 0 < CD ""' ::t
. 10/18/12 3
CD -:=
2:
3
05/06/13 "'C -
11/22/13
06/10/14
12/27/14
01 01 0,
01 01 0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
01 .j:>.
0,
01 .j:>.
0
01 ~
01
01 w 0
01 1\:l 0,
01 1\:l 0
r-------+---+----+----1-------r----+-----+ 07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/11
·04/01/12
10/18/12
-05/06/13
. 11/22/13
-06/10/14
.._ __ _._ ___ ..__ __ __,_ ___ _.__ __ ___,_ ___ _._ __ __._ 12/27/14
~ z I .....
<D
~ -CD ""'(
r-CD < CD
0 < CD
""'(
::f
3 CD -?
C"
3
"C -
-c.
E -.c . .., ,.._ -CJ)
E
i= ....
CJ) > 0 -CJ) > CJ)
..J .... CJ) ..,
~
0
C")
I 3: :s
v ~/LG/G ~ -.-----.-----.-------r-------,.-------.----.
8 ~~v~/80
G~/~0/vO
0~/8~/~~
60/90/LO ·
80/GG/GO
90/0 ~/0~
S0/8G/SO +----+-----l------1-----1-----t------i
0
00 I'--
0
0 00
17~/LG/G~
8~/17~/80 .
-a. ~
E G~/~0/170 . ~ -Jl . ... ,.._ -Q)
E
i= o~/8~n ~ ....
Q) > 0
Q) > Q)
..J .... 60/90/LO
Q) ... ca 3: ,...
('I)
I 3: 80/GG/GO :a:
90/0~/0~ .
90/8G/90
0
cci <0
~
~
~
)
~ ~
'
~~
\
0
C\1 1'--
..------~
0
<0 1'--
0
00 1'--
0
0 co
0
C\1 co
TabF
Depths to Groundwater and Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -1
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,646.96 5,648.09 1.13 112.5
5,600.38 02/06/09 47.71 46.58
5,599.99 07/21/09 48.10 46.97
5,600.26 09/21/09 47.83 46.70
5,601.10 10/28/09 46.99 45.86
5,602.59 12/14/09 45.50 44.37
5,600.55 03/11/10 47.54 46.41
5,600.66 05/11110 47.43 46.30
5,599.18 09/29/10 48.91 47.78
5,598.92 12/21/10 49.17 48.04
5,598.29 02/28111 49.80 48.67
5,597.80 06/21/11 50.29 49.16
5,597.32 09/20/11 50.77 49.64
5,597.15 12/21/11 50.94 49.81
5,596.54 03/27/12 51.55 50.42
5,596.52 06/28/12 51.57 50.44
5,595.03 09/27/12 53.06 51.93
5,596.62 12/28/12 51.47 50.34
5,593.54 03/28113 54.55 53.42
5,592.38 06/27/13 55.71 54.58
5,591.65 09/27113 56.44 55.31
5,590.34 12/20/13 57.75 56.62
5,590.03 03/27114 58.06 56.93
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-2
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,625.75 5,626.69 0.94 95
5,611.37 02~06/09 15.32 14.38
5,610.63 07/21109 16.06 15.12
5,609.73 09/21109 16.96 16.02
5,607.08 11/02/09 19.61 18.67
5,606.57 12/14/09 20.12 19.18
5,612.45 03/11110 14.24 13.30
5,612.78 05/11/10 13.91 12.97
5,611.37 09/29110 15.32 14.38
5,610.24 12/21/10 16.45 15.51
5,610.64 02/28/11 16.05 15.11
5,609.78 06/21111 16.91 15.97
5609.79 09/20/11 16.90 15.96
5609.72 12/21111 16.97 16.03
5,605.69 03/27112 21.00 20.06
5,605.67 06/28/12 21.02 20.08
5,603.03 09/27/12 23.66 22.72
5,605.76 12/28/12 20.93 19.99
5,598.28 03/28/13 28.41 27.47
5,594.32 06/27/13 32.37 31.43
5,594.38 09/27/13 32.31 31.37
5,594.68 12/20/13 32.01 31.07
5,597.79 03/27114 28.9 27.96
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -3
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitorin~ (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5 633.64 5,634.50 0.86 110
5,603.77 02106109 30.73 29.87
5,602.37 07/21109 32.13 31.27
5,602.34 09/21109 32.16 31.30
5,602.60 10/28/09 31.90 31.04
5,603.12 12/14/09 31.38 30.52
5,602.90 03/11/10 31.60 30.74
5,603.23 05/11110 31.27 30.41
5,602.86 09/29/10 31.64 30.78
5,603.35 12/21/10 31.15 30.29
5,602.89 02/28/11 31.61 30.75
5,602.75 06/21/11 31.75 30.89
5,602.40 09/20/11 32.10 31.24
5,602.40 12/21111 32.10 31.24
5,601.70 03/27/12 32.80 31.94
5,601.67 06/28112 32.83 31.97
5,600.50 09/27/12 34.00 33.14
5,601.74 12/28/12 32.76 31.90
5,598.60 03/28/13 35.90 35.04
5,597.18 06/27/13 37.32 36.46
5,597.36 09/27113 37 .14 36.28
5,597.60 12/20/13 36.90 36.04
5,598.00 03/27/14 36.50 35.64
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -4
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,641.04 5,641.87 0.83 136
5,601.47 02/06/09 40.40 39.57
5,604.26 07/21/09 37.61 36.78
5,605.02 09/21/09 36.85 36.02
5,605.87 10/28/09 36.00 35.17
5,605.81 12114/09 36.06 35.23
5,605.31 03/11/10 36.56 35.73
5,605.36 05/11110 36.51 35.68
5,604.59 09/29/10 37.28 36.45
5,604.42 12/21/10 37.45 36.62
5,603.69 02/28/11 38 .18 37.35
5,603.36 06/21111 38.51 37.68
5,602.82 09/20111 39.05 38.22
5,602.79 12/21/11 39.08 38.25
5,600.82 03/27112 41.05 40.22
5,600.84 06/28/12 41.03 40.20
5,598.47 09/27/12 43.40 42.57
5,600.86 12/28/12 41.01 40.18
5,595.57 03/28113 46.30 45.47
5,594.12 06/27/13 47.75 46.92
5,593.33 09/27/13 48.54 47.71
5,591.92 12/20/13 49.95 49.12
5,591.85 03/27114 50.02 49.19
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-6
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitorin~ . blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,663.03 5,664.94 1.91 135
5,589.52 08/25/09 75.42 73.51
5,589.46 09/22/09 75.48 73.57
5,589.61 11103/09 75 .33 73.42
5,589.92 12/14/09 75.02 73.11
5,590.24 03/11/10 74.70 72.79
5,590.40 05/11/10 74.54 72.63
5,590.24 09/29/10 74.70 72.79
5,590.49 12/21/10 74.45 72.54
5,590.16 02/28/11 74.78 72.87
5,590.44 06/21/11 74.50 72.59
5,590.35 09/20/11 74.59 72.68
5,590.67 12/21/11 74.27 72.36
5,590.34 03/27/12 74.60 72.69
5,590.32 06/28/12 74.62 72.71
5,589.77 09/27/12 75.17 73.26
5,589.67 12/28/12 75.27 73.36
5,589.45 03/28/13 75.49 73.58
5,589.01 06/27/13 75 .93 74.02
5,588.99 09/27/13 75.95 74.04
5,588.15 12/20/13 76.79 74.88
5,588.50 03/27/14 76.44 74.53
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -7
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitorin~ (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,947.39 5,649.26 1.87 120
5,552.56 08/25/09 g6.70 94.83
5,558.34 09/21/09 90.92 89.05
5,558.82 11110/09 90.44 88.57
5,558.96 12/14/09 90.30 88.43
5,559.54 03/11/10 89.72 87.85
5,559.60 05111110 89.66 87.79
5,559.83 09/29/10 89.43 87.56
5,559.00 12/21110 90.26 88.39
5,559.68 02/28/11 89.58 87.71
5,560.43 06/21111 88.83 86.96
5,560.46 09/20/11 88.80 86.93
5,560.78 12/21111 88.48 86.61
5,560.92 03/27112 88.34 86.47
5,560.87 06/28/12 88.39 86.52
5,561.40 09/27112 87.86 85.99
5,561.50 12/28112 87.76 85.89
5,562.01 03/28/13 87.25 85.38
5,562.21 06/27/13 87.05 85.18
5,562.41 09/27/13 86.85 84.98
5,562.23 12/20/13 87.03 85.16
5,562.85 03/27114 86.41 84.54
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-14
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,647.80 5,649.53 1.73 135
5,586.18 11/04/09 63.35 61.62
5,586.51 12/14/09 63.02 61.29
5,586.71 03/11/10 62.82 61.09
5,586.72 05/11/10 62.81 61.08
5,586.53 09/29/10 63.00 61 .27
5,586.80 12/21/10 62.73 61.00
5,586.74 02/28/11 62.79 61.06
5,586.84 06/21111 62.69 60.96
5,586.73 09/20/11 62.80 61.07
5,586.98 12/21/11 62.55 60.82
5,587.07 03/27112 62.46 60.73
5,587.10 06/28/12 62.43 60.70
5,587.07 09/27/12 62.46 60.73
5,587.33 12/28/12 62.20 60.47
5,587.43 03/28/13 62.10 60.37
5,587.43 06/27/13 62.10 60.37
5,587.72 09/27/13 61.81 60.08
5,587.22 12/20/13 62.31 60.58
5,587.91 03/27/14 61.62 59.89
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-16
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitorin~ (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,651.07 5,652.70 1.63 100
5,603.34 11104/09 49.36 47.73
5,603.56 12/14/09 49.14 47.51
5,603.84 03/11110 48.86 47.23
5,604.31 05/11/10 48.39 46.76
5,604.28 09129110 48.42 46.79
5,604.39 12/21110 48.31 46.68
5,604.20 02/28111 48.50 46.87
5,604.55 06/21111 48.15 46.52
5,604.74 09/20/11 47.96 46.33
5,604.94 12/21/11 47.76 46.13
5,604.84 03/27/12 47.86 46.23
5,604.85 06/28/12 47.85 46.22
5,604.99 09/27112 47.71 46.08
5,605.10 12/28112 47.60 45.97
5,605.22 03/28/13 47.48 45.85
5,605.11 06/27/13 47.59 45.96
5,605.39 09/27/13 47.31 45.68
5,604.99 12/20/13 47.71 46.08
5,605.71 03/27/14 46.99 45.36
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -18
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitorin~ (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,643.95 5,645.45 1.50 100
5,586.85 11102/09 58.60 57.10
5,600.14 12/14/09 45 .31 43.81
5,587.36 03111/10 58.09 56.59
5,587.71 05111110 57.74 56.24
5,587.50 09/29110 57.95 56.45
5,607.66 12/21110 37.79 36.29
5,587.35 02/28111 58.10 56.60
5,587.71 06/21111 57.74 56.24
5,587.65 09/20111 57.80 56.30
5,587.95 12/21111 57.50 56.00
5,587.05 03/27/12 58.40 56.90
5,587.05 06/28112 58.40 56.90
5,587.50 09/27/12 57.95 56.45
5,587.50 12/28/12 57.95 56.45
5,587.32 03/28113 58.13 56.63
5,586.95 06/27/13 58.50 57.00
5,587.02 09/27113 58.43 56.93
5,586.26 12/20113 59.19 57.69
5,586.87 03/27114 58.58 57.08
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -19
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,659.59 5,661.36 1.77 110
5,606.17 11/02/09 55.19 53.42
5,606.70 12114/09 54.66 52.89
5,607.22 03111110 54.14 52.37
5,607.89 05/11/10 53.47 51.70
5,607.98 09/29/10 53.38 51.61
5,608.41 12/21110 52.95 51.18
5,608.49 02/28/11 52.87 51.10
5,608.60 06/21/11 52.76 50.99
5,609.17 09/20111 52.19 50.42
5,608.90 12/21111 52.46 50.69
5,608.87 03/27/12 52.49 50.72
5,608.86 06/28112 52.50 50.73
5,608.86 09/27/12 52.50 50.73
5,608.86 12/28112 52.50 50.73
5,609.17 03/28/13 52.19 50.42
5,608.88 06/27/13 52.48 50.71
5,608.92 09/27/13 52.44 50.67
5,608.46 12/20/13 52.90 51.13
5,608.88 03/27/14 52.48 50.71
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well MW -30
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitorin~ (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,613.34 5,614.50 1.16 110
5,534.92 10/24/2006 79.58 78.42
5,535.09 3/16/2007 79.41 78.25
5,535.46 8/27/2007 79.04 77.88
5,535.06 10/15/2007 79.44 78.28
5,535.78 3/15/2008 78.72 77.56
5,536.26 6/15/2008 78.24 77.08
5,536.35 9/15/2008 78.15 76.99
5,536.68 11/15/2008 77.82 76.66
5,535.42 3/15/2009 79.08 77.92
5,537.11 6/30/2009 77.39 76.23
5,536.93 911012009 77.57 76.41
5,537.23 12/1112009 77.27 76.11
5,537.59 3/11/2010 76.91 75.75
5,537.85 5/11/2010 76.65 75.49
5,538.37 9/29/2010 76.13 74.97
5537.70 12/21/2010 76.8 75.64
5537.67 2/28/2011 76.83 75.67
5538.31 6/2112011 76.19 75.03
5538.15 9/20/2011 76.35 75.19
5538.42 12/21/2011 76.08 74.92
5538.54 3/27/2012 75.96 74.8
5538.60 6/28/2012 75.9 74.74
5538.68 9/27/2012 75.82 74.66
5538.99 12/28/2012 75.51 74.35
5539.25 3/28/2013 75.25 74.09
5539.05 6/27/2013 75.45 74.29
5539.60 9/27/2013 74.90 73.74
5539.67 12/20/2013 74.83 73.67
5539.77 3/27/2014 74.73 73.57
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well MW-31
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,615.26 5,616.40 1.14 130
5,544.07 10/24/2006 72.33 71.19
5,544.45 3116/2007 71.95 70.81
5,536.94 8/27/2007 79.46 78.32
5,544.62 10115/2007 71.78 70.64
5,545.37 3115/2008 71.03 69.89
5,544.50 6115/2008 71.90 70.76
5,545.94 9/15/2008 70.46 69.32
5,546.42 11115/2008 69.98 68.84
5,546.03 3/15/2009 70.37 69.23
5,546.65 6/30/2009 69.75 68.61
5,546.45 9/10/2009 69.95 68.81
5,546.75 12/11/2009 69.65 68.51
5,547.09 3111/2010 69.31 68.17
5,547.41 5/11/2010 68.99 67.85
5,547.28 9/29/2010 69.12 67.98
5547.45 12/21/2010 68.95 67.81
5547.37 2/28/2011 69.03 67.89
5547.96 6/21/2011 68.44 67.3
5547.65 9/20/2011 68.75 67.61
5548.34 12/21/2011 68.06 66.92
5548.30 3/27/2012 68.10 66.96
5548.40 6/28/2012 68.00 66.86
5548.59 9/27/2012 67.81 66.67
5548.91 12/28/2012 67.49 66.35
5549.14 3/28/2013 67.26 66.12
5548.90 6/27/2013 67.50 66.36
5549.25 9/27/2013 67.15 66.01
5549.16 12/20/2013 67.24 66.10
5548.95 3/27/2014 67.45 66.31
TabG
Laboratory Analytical Reports
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2014
Lab Sample ID: 1401249-010
Client Sample ID: PIEZ-01_01132014
Collection Date: 1/13/2014 1330h
Received Date: 1116/2014 949h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Date
Analyzed
1/21 /2014 108h
1/22/2014 2026h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
E300.0 10.0 56.2
E353.2 1.00 6.79
Report Date: 1/27/2014 Page 13 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA. 11nd RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordum:c to NELAC pru!ucols Pertinent sampling information is hlCatcd on lhc Hlt:u:hcd COC. Confidential Business lnfonnation: This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the
~ddrc~cc, Privilc~cs o!' .sub~scq~cnt ~~I! of the ~~~c of this .con~ puny or uny ~:~her of its stuff. or rcproductio~ ~f this n.."(lO~ in ~on?cction~ with the ~~~~cr1isc~cnl, p~~molio.n or sale of ~~y ~rod~ct or p~occss, ~r in :onm;,c~ion w!th th~ r::p~blication of this rcpor1
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2014
Lab Sample ID: 1401249-011
Client Sample ID: PIEZ-02_01132014
ANALY TI CAL LABoRAToRIEs Collection Date: 1/13/2014 1304h
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Received Date: 1/16/2014 949h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting Analytical
Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
1/21/2014 131h E300.0 2.00 11.4
1122/2014 2027h E353.2 0.100 0.169
Report Date: 1127/2014 Page 14of19
All analyses aprlicoblc to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent s11mpling information is lm:atcd on I he a11a..:hcd CDC. Confidential Business lnfonnalion: This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the
~ddrcssce Privilc~cs orsub;o;eq~cnt ~~c of the ~~~c or this .con~pDny or ~:~ny ~:~bcr of its stoff. or repro<.luclio~ ~~this rcpo~ in .con.nection,_ wi1h the a~~crtiscn.lcnt, P~?motio.n or sale of~~~ ~rod~ct or p~occss, ~r in :onm;.c!ion w!th th: r:-p~blication of this rcpor1
American West
ANALYTICAl LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
1st Quarter Nitrate 2014
1401249-012
Client Sample ID: PIEZ-03_01132014
Collection Date: 1/13/2014 1315h
Received Date: 1116/2014 949h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Date
Analyzed
1/21/2014 155h
1/22/2014 2028h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
E300.0 5.00 26.0
E353.2 0.200 1.70
Report Date: 1/27/2014 Page 15 of 19
All analyses Hpplicahlc to the CWA, SDWA. ani.! RCRA arc performed in m:cordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnulion is located on the allachcJ COC. Con11dt!ntial Business Jnrormalion: This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the
·~ddrcsscc. Privilc~cs o!' sub~scq~unt ~~c oF the ~~~c of this .con~p:my or any ~~~mbcr of its staff, or rcproduclio~ ~fthis rcpo~ in .con~cction~ with the a~vc11isc~1cnt, p~~molio.n ~r sale of ~".Y ~rocl~ct or p~occss, ~r in ~onm~.c~ion w~th lh: r:_-p~hiJcalion of this report
American West
.ANALYTICAL lABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
1st Quarter Nitrate 2014
1401249-003
Client Sample ID: TWN-01_01142014
Collection Date: 1/14/2014 1047h
Received Date: 1116/2014 949h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Date
Analyzed
1/20/2014 2139h
1/22/2014 2011h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
E300.0 5.00 29.2
E353.2 0.100 1.47
ReportDate: 1/27/2014 Page6ofl9
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA arc JlCrfonncd in ;;~~.:curdance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infommtiun is Joe<~ led on the aUached COC. Confidcnlial Busin~ss Jnfonnatiun: This report is providct.l for the exclusive usc of the
~ddresscc Privilc~cs o~ sub ... scq~cnt ~~c of the ~~me of this .con~pnny or any ~~mber of its stoff, or rcproductio~ ?.~this rcpo~ in ~on~cction_ with the a~.~crtise~ent, p~umotio!l or sale of ~~y ~rod~cl or pr~css, ~r in :onn~c!lon w!th th~ r~-publicalion oft hit> report
ANALYTICAl lABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2014
Lab Sample ID: 1401249-007
Client Sample ID: TWN-02_01132014
Collection Date: 1/13/2014 1430h
Received Date: 1116/2014 949h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
Chloride mg/L 1/20/2014 2312h E300.0 10.0 72.4
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L 1/22/2014 2017h £353.2 10.0 42.6
1 -Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix inteiference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
Report Date: 1/27/2014 Page I 0 of 19
All ann lyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA .. and RCRA are performed in accurd~tnce to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the aUachcd COC. Confidential Business lnfommtion: This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the
~ddrcssee1 Prh•ilc~cs o~sub~seq~cnt ~~c oft he ~~~c of this .con.lpnny or nny ".!.:~her of its stuff. or rcprotJuclio~ ~rthis TL!pO~ in .con~cction~ with the a~~crtisc~nl. p~~motio.n l~r sale of ~~y ~ro<l~ct or p~occss, ~r in :onn~c~ion w!th th~ n;·puhlitation of this report
American West
ANALYTICAl LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2014
Lab Sample ID: 140 1249-006
Client Sample ID: TWN-03_01152014
Collection Date: 1115/2014 740h
Received Date: 1116/2014 949h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit
Chloride mg/L 1/20/2014 2249h E300.0 50.0
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg!L 1122/2014 2016h E353.2 10.0
1 -Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
@-High RPD due to suspected sample non-homogeneity or matrix interference.
Analytical
Result Qual
160
19.6 '@
ReportDate: 1/27/2014 Page9of19
All uno lyses upplicahle to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accurdance to NELAC protocols Pcrtim:nl st~mpling information is located on the atlochcd COC Confit.lcntial Business Jnfonnalion: This rC'por1 is provided for the cxclusi\·e use ufthc
~ddrcssec Privilc~cs of sub;-;eq~t!nl .u~e of the ~~~c of this .con~p1my or any ~~~1ber of its shtff, or rcrroductio~ ~f this rt:po~ in ~on~cctiun~ with the a~vcrtiscmcnl, P~?motio.n or sale of ~ny ~r(){]~ct or p~occss, ~r in :onn~c!ion w!th th~ r:-puhlication of this report
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2014
Lab Sample ID: 1401249-004
Client Sample ID: TWN-04_01142014
ANALYTICAL 1 AaoRAroRIEs Collection Date: 1/14/2014 1227h
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Received Date: 1116/2014 949h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting Analytical
Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
1/20/2014 2202h E300.0 5.00 28.4
1/22/2014 2013h E353.2 0.100 1.41
Report Date: 112 7/20 14 Page 7 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA arc performed in accordDncc to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the altachcd COC Confidential Business lnfommtion: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the
~t.ldrcssee Privilc~cs o~sub~scq~cnt ~~c of the~~~~ of this _co~pany or any n2.;.mhcrofits stnff, or rcproductio~ ~fthis rcpo~ in .con~ection ... with the a~vcr1isen~cnl, p~omotio.n ~r sale of!~.~rod~ct or p~ccss, ~r in ~onn~c!ion w~th th~ n~-p~hlication oF I his report
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
!-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2014
Lab Sample ID: 1401249-002
Client Sample ID: TWN-07 _ 01152014
Collection Date: 1/15/2014 730h
Received Date: 1/16/2014 949h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Date
Analyzed
1120/2014 2116h
1122/2014 2010h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
E300.0 1.00 5.75
E353.2 0.100 0.882
Report Date: 1/27/2014 Page 5 of 19
All analyses applic::~ble to the CWA. SDWA, <Jm) RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC pro!ocols, Pertinent sampling infonnation is loc<Jied on 11-lc a1tached COC Confidential Business lnfonnntion: This report is provided for the exclusive use of the
~lldrcsscc Privilc~cs o!' sub~scq~cnt ~;"e of the ~~~e of this .con.lpany or any ~~mber of its staff, or rcpmlluc1io!! ?,fthis repo~ in ;on~cction. with the a~vertise~ent, p~ornotio,n o_r sale of ~'J ~rodu~ct or p~ot:ess, ~r in :onn~c!ion w!th th; n~.-publicalion of this report
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: I st Quarter Nitrate 2014
Lab Sample ID: 1401249-001
Client Sample ID: TWN-07R_Oll42014
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIEs Collection Date: 1114/2014 957h
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone:[phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Received Date: 1116/2014 949h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting Analytical
Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
1/20/2014 2006h E300.0 1.00 < 1.00
1/22/2014 2009h E353.2 0.100 < 0.100
ReportDate: 1/27/2014 Page4ofl9
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC proltlCols Pertinent sampling infonnation is locatclf on lhc a1tached COC Confidential Business lnfonnation: This lt:port is proYided for the exclusive usc of the
~ddres:;ee Privilc~cs o:sub~scq~cnl ~c of the ~~~e ofthis.con~pany or any ~:mbcr of its staff, or rcproductio~ ~fthis repo~ in ;o~cction. with I he a~~er1ise~cnt, p~omolio~ or sale of~~y ~rod~cl or r:occss, ~r in ~onn:_c~ion w!th th: r:-puhlicalion of this rcrlOrt
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2014
Lab Sample ID: 1401249-005
Client Sample ID: TWN-18_01142014
Collection Date: 1114/2014 1312h
Received Date: 1116/2014 949h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Date
Analyzed
1/20/2014 2225h
1/22/2014 2014h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
E300.0 10.0 68.4
E353.2 1.00 2.33
ReportDate: 1/27/2014 Page8ofl9
All anD lyses applic::~hlc to the CWA. SDWA, ami RCRA arc pcrrormeil in accordance to NELAC protocols1 Pcr1inenl sampling information is !OL:atcd on the aU ached COC Confidential Business Jnfonnation; This report is provided for the exclusive use of the
~ddrcssce. Privilc~cs o~ sub~scq~cnt ~~e of the ~~~e of this .con~pnny or any ~:mhcr of its staff, or rcprmJuclio~ .~fthis repo~ in ~on~cction_ with the a~:crtisc~cnt, P~?molio.n o.r sale of ~~y ~rod~cl or p~occss, ~r in :onn~'i:~ion w~lh th~ ~-publication of I his report
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2014
Lab Sample ID: 1401525-015
Client Sample ID: TW4-22_01272014
Collection Date: 1127/2014 1403h
Received Date: 113112014 919h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Date
Analyzed
2/4/2014 643h
J/31/2014 1538h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
E300.0 100 598
E353.2 10.0 54.6
Report Date: 2/10/20 14 Page 20 of 49
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance 1() NELAC pn.Jiocob. Pertinc:nt sampling ffiforma1ioo is )pealed on lhe anocbed COC1 Confi()colial Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive usc of1he
~ddressec Privilc~cs o~ ~~en1 ~of the~ ufthis .con:-pany or any~ of Rs slaff. or rcprod~ ?,~lhis repo~ in ~~'"Clion~ wi1h 1bc ~~CJ1i.~"lll. V:?mo1i~ ~ ~le of ~~Y. ~rod~ or ~~css, ~~in ~o~C:ion w!lh th; r:--publication of Ibis reporl
American West
ANALVTJCAl lABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2014
Lab Sample ID: 1401525-008
Client Sample ID: TW4-24_01272014
Collection Date: 1/27/2014 1355h
Received Date: 1/31/2014 919h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg!L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg!L
Date
Analyzed
2/4/2014 238b
1131/2014 1529b
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
E300.0 500 809
E353.2 10.0 31.6
Report Date: 2/10/2014 Page 13 of49
All 8JK1lyse5 applicable to the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are perfoJ'TTJed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pcr11nenl sampling jnfonnation i.s located on lhe attachetl COC Confidential Business Jnfonnation: Thi.s report is provided for the exclusive use of the
~rcssce-Privile~cs o!sub~scq~ ~:<te oflhc ~c of1bio; .con~pany or ;my ~cr of its s1aff. or rcproducti~ ~!this rcpo~ in ~JJ~c1ionA v.ith the ~ver1~t. ~omotio_n 0! ~k: of ~~y J?foduc1 or ~ess, ~r in :onn:c~ion w~th th~ n;--p~bJication of this n.-porl
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
!-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QAOfficer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2014
Lab Sample ID: 1401525-003
Client Sample ID: TW4-25_01272014
Collection Date: 1/27/2014 1338h
Received Date: 1/31/2014 919h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Date
Analyzed
2/6/2014 2018h
1/31/2014 1515h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
E300.0 10.0 85.7
E353.2 1.00 2.16
Report Date: 2/1 0/2014 Page 8 of 49
AH aJUJ)yscs applicable to the CWA. SOW A. and RCRA are performed in accordance 1o NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling inrormation is located on the attached COC. ConfJdcnliaJ Business JnfOJlDOitioo: This repol1 is pro-..idcd for the t..'lctum·e 1ISC of the
~tldressre. Privile~~ o! sub_s~cnt ~oft he ~r_nc of Lhis _c~pany or nny ~~bcr ofils staff. or rq:Jroducti~ ~~this rcpo~ in ~on~cction~ with the ~vertisl..'"_lCnt. ~~tio_n ~ ~h: of ~'!Y ~c1 fH ~e:ss, ~in ~~~iun ~th 1he r:-~blicalion of this repot
463 West 3600 South
:lalt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2014
Lab Sample ID: 1402140-010
Client Sample ID: TW4-60_02062014
Collection Date: 2/6/2014 845h
Received Date: 2/10/2014 1015h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
Chloride mg/L 211 1/2014 220h E300,0 1.00 < 1.00
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L 2/14/2014 1806h E3532 0.100 < 0.100
Report Date: 2117/2014 Page 15 of34
All analyses applicable to lhe CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC Confidential Business Information: This report is proYided for the exclusi' e use of the
~ddressee Pririle~es o:sub~seq~l ~~e of the ~~e of this .co~pany or an) ~mber of its staJT, or reproductio~ ~fthis repoi! in.con?ection.w:ilh the ~vertisemenl, P~?motio.n or sale of~!)" ~rod~ct or p~ocess, ~r in ~nn:_c~ion "~th th~ r~-publication of this report
American West ANALYTICAl LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2014
Lab Sample ID: 1401249-009
Client Sample ID: TWN-60_01152014
Collection Date: 1115/2014 700h
Received Date: 1116/2014 949h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Date
Analyzed
112112014 045h
1122/2014 2024h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
E300.0 1.00 < 1.00
E353.2 0.100 < 0.100
Report Date: 1127/2014 Page 12 of 19
All analyses applicnhlc to the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are pcrfom1ed in tJc~ordance to NELAC protocols, Pertinent sampling infonm:1tiun is lm:atcd on the attached COC Confidential Busincs!' Jnfom1ation: This rcpor1 is provided for the exclusive usc oft he
~ddrcssce Privilc~cs or sub;eq~cnl ~~c of the ~~:nc of this .con~pany or any ~~mhcr of its staff, or rcprmJuctio~ ?.:this rcpo~ in ~on~cction~ with the a~vcr1isc~cnt, p~~motio.n or sale of~~~ ~rod~cl or p~occs.s, ~r in :onn~c!ion W!lh th: r:-pulllicalion of I his report
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
1st Quarter Nitrate 2014
1401249-008
Client Sample ID: TWN-65_01142014
Collection Date: 1/14/2014 1227h
Received Date: 1/16/2014 949h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Date
Analyzed
112112014 022h
1122/2014 2018h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
E300.0 5.00 26.4
E353.2 0.100 1.33
Report Date: 1127/2014 Page II of 19
All cmalyscs applicDblc lo the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonmJtion is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business 1nfornm1ion: This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the
~ddrcssce Privilc~cs o; sub~seq~cnt ~~c of the ~~~c of this .con~pany or uny ~:mher of its stnff. orrcpnH.Iuctio~ ~flhis rcpo~ in .con~cction~" ith the a~vertisc~cnl, P~?molio.n ~r sale of ~~y ~rod~cl or p~occss, ~r in ~onn:_c!ion w!th th~ n~-puh1icalion of this report
ANAlYTICAL lABOAATOAtfS
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: (80 I) 263-8687
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.corn
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Garrin Palmer
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
TEL: [phone]
RE: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2014
Dear Garrin Palmer: Lab Set ID: 1401249
American West Analytical Laboratories received 12 sample(s) on 1116/2014 for the
analyses presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AWAL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) in Utah and Texas; and is
state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, and Missouri.
All analyses were performed in accordance to the NELAP protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation scope documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
Thank You,
Approved by:
Digitally signed by Jose G
G Rocha
DN: cn=Jose G. Rocha,
• o=American West Analytical
Laboratories, ou=Quality
Jose
Rocha Assurance Officer,
emall=[e-mail],
c=US
Date: 2014.01.2715:36:25
-07'00'
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 1/27/2014 Page I of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, am.l RCRA are perFormed in iiCCordancc to NELAC protocols Pertinent s~mpling infonnHiion is located on the attached COC Confidential Business lnFom1ation: This report is provided For the cx.clu.~ivc usc oFt he
:~ddresscc Pri\·ilc~cs o:subrscq~cnl ~~c of lhc ~~~c of this .con.lpnny or any ~:mber of ils stnff, or rcprotluclio~ ~fthis rcpo~ in ~on~cclionr with the a~~cr1isen.lenl, P~?motio.n or sale of ~~y ~rod~c1 or p~ocess, ~1 in :onn:_c~ion w!th th~ r~-puhlicalion of this report
SAMPLE SUMMARY.
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
ANALYTICAl lABOAATORIES Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2014
Lab Set ID: 1401249
Date Received: 1/16/2014 949h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
463 West 3600 South
1401249-001A TWN-07R 01142014 1114/2014 957h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
~alt Lake City, UT 84115 1401249-0018 TWN-07R_01142014 1/14/2014 957h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
140 1249-002A TWN-07 01152014 1115/2014 730h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1401249-0028 TWN-07 01152014 1115/2014 730h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Phone:[phone] 1401249-003A TWN-01 01142014 1/14/2014 1047h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Toll Free: [phone] 1401249-0038 TWN-01 01142014 1114/2014 1047h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Fax: [phone] 1401249-004A TWN-04_01142014 1114/2014 1227h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1401249-0048 TWN-04 01142014 1/14/2014 1227h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
!-mail : [e-mail] 1401249-005A TWN-18 01142014 1114/2014 1312h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1401249-0058 TWN-18 01142014 1114/2014 1312h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2 web: www.awal-labs.com 140 1249-006A TWN-03_01152014 1115/2014 740h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1401249-0068 TWN-03 01152014 1/15/2014 740h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1401249-007A TWN-02 01132014 1113/2014 1430h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Kyle F. Gross 1401249-0078 TWN-02 01132014 1113/2014 1430h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Laboratory Director 140 1249-008A TWN-65 01142014 1114/2014 1227h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1401249-0088 TWN-65 01142014 1/14/2014 1227h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Jose Rocha 1401249-009A TWN-60 01152014 1115/2014 700h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
QA Officer 1401249-0098 TWN-60 01152014 1115/2014 700h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1401249-010A PIEZ-01_01132014 1113/2014 1330h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1401249-0108 PIEZ-01 01132014 1113/2014 1330h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1401249-011A PIEZ-02_01132014 1/13/2014 1304h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1401249-0118 PIEZ-02_01132014 1/13/2014 1304h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1401249-012A PIEZ-03 01132014 1113/2014 1315h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1401249-0128 PIEZ-03 01132014 1113/2014 1315h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Report Date: 1/27/2014 Page 2 of 19
A II annlysc!i applico:Jhle to the CWA, SOWA. and RCRA arc rx:rformcd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infom1ation is locHted on the all ached COC_ Confidential Business lnfom1ation: This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the
addressee .. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name or this company or any member of its stnff, or reproduction of this report in connection \\-ith the advertisement, promotion or sale ur any producl or process, or in connection with the re-publication of thi:; report . . . . . . . ~. ' -. ... . . ~ ~· " . . ' . . ' . . ~ ' . . ~ .
American West
ANALYTICAl LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
~a1t Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: (80 I) 263-8686
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: (80 I) 263-8687
!-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-1abs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Inorganic Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
1st Quarter Nitrate 2014
1401249
1/16/2014
1/13, 1/14 & 1115/2014
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation of all
samples were performed within the method holding times. All samples were properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD:
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, with the
following exceptions:
Sample ID Analyte QC Explanation
140 1249-006B Nitrate-Nitrite (as N) MSD/RPD Sample non-homogeneity
or matrix interference
1401249-007B Nitrate-Nitrite (as N) MSD Sample matrix interference
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 1/2 7/2014 Page 3 of 19
All analyses applicable to thr;: CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is lucaled on the alt:u.:hed COC. Confidential Business Information; Thi:-; report is provided fort he exclusive use of the
~lldrcsscc Privile~cs of sub~seq~enl ~~c of the ~~~c of this .con~pany many ~mhcr of ils stnff. or rcproductlo.!! of this repn~ in ~on~cclion. with the advcr1iscmcnt, p~omoli~n or sale uf ~~y ~rod~ct or p~occss, ~r in ~onn:_c~ion w~th th~ r:-puhlicalion of I his report
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPQRT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Gartin Palmer
Dept: we Lab Set ID: 1401249
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2014
Analyte Result Units Method
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R63968 Date Analyzed: 01/20/2014 1527h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.75 mg/L E300.0
Lab Sample ID: LC8-R64059 Date Analyzed: 01/22/2014 2007h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.970 mg/L E353.2
MDL
0.0114
0.00252
Reporting
Limit
0.100
0.100
QC Type: LCS
Amount
Spiked
5.000
1.000
Spike Ref.
Amount
0
0
%REC
95.0
97.0
Limits
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 1/27/20 14 Page 16 of 19
analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols, Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of ~ubscqucnt usc oft~
nc of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the rc·publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1401249
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2014
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: MB-R63968 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride < 0.100
Lab Sample ID: MB-R64059 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) <0.100
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: (801 ) 263-8687
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Q_C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
QC Type: MBLK
Reporting Amount Spike Ref.
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC
01 /20/2014 1504h
mg/L E300.0 0.0114 0.100
01/22/2014 2006h
mg/L E353.2 0.00252 0.100
Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt ~.RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 1/27/2014 Page 17 of 19
·. analyses applicable to the CWA. SOW A, and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of th
nc of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in conncc.:tion with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the rc·publication of this report fol' any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1401249
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2014
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: 1401249-00IAMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 5.23
Lab Sample ID: 1401249-006BMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 122
Units
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: (801 ) 263-8687
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
_Q_C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
QC Type: MS
Reporting Amount Spike Ref.
Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount o/oREC
01/20/2014 2029h
mg/L E300.0 0.0114 0.100 5.000 0 105
01/22/2014 2030h
mg/L E353.2 0.252 10.0 100.0 19.6 103
Lab Sample ID: 1401249-007BMS Date Analyzed: 01/22/2014 2032h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 148 mg/L E353.2 0.252 10.0 100.0 42.6 106
Limits
90-110
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 1/27/2014 Page 18 of 19
: analyses applicable to the CWA, SOW A, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC Confidential Business lnfonnation: This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of th
nc of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3 600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC_SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Lab Set ID: 1401249
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2014
Analyte
Lab Sample ID: 1401249-00lAMSD
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride
Lab Sample ID: 1401249-006BMSD
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N)
Lab Sample ID: 140l249-007BMSD
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N)
Result Units Method
Date Analyzed: 01/20/2014 2053h
5.26 mg/L E300.0
Date Analyzed: 01122/2014 2031h
138 mg/L E353.2
Date Analyzed: 01/22/2014 2034h
160 mg/L E353.2
@-High RPD due /o suspected sample non-homogeneity or matrix interference.
MDL
0.0114
0.252
0.252
1 -Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The me/hod is in control as indicated by the LCS.
Dept: we
QCType: MSD
Reporting Amount Spike Ref.
Limit Spiked Amount %REC
0.100 5.000 0 105
10.0 100.0 19.6 118
10.0 100.0 42.6 118
Limits
90-110
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit
5.23 0.515 20
122 11.8 10
148 7.97 10
Qual
'@
Report Date: 1/27/2014 Page 19 of 19
' analyses applicable to the CW A. SDW A, and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Infom1ation: This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of tl1
nc of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
American West Analytical Laboratories UL
Denison
WORK ORDER Summary WorkOrder: 1401249 Page 1 of2
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 1/27/2014
ClientiD: DEN100 Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2014 QC Level: III WO Type: Project
Comments: PA Rush. QC 3 (Summary/No chromatograms). MUST report project specific DL's: Cl@ 1 mg/L, N02/N03 @ 0.1 mg/L. EDD-Denison & LOCUS.
Email Group;
SampleiD Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1401249-001A ~-071t_01142014 1/14/2014 0957h 1/16/2014 0949h 300.0-W Aqueous 01 df-cl
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1401249-001B N02/N03-W-353.2 01 df-no2/no3
I SELAnalytes: N03N02N
1401249-002A TWN-07 _01152014 1/15/2014 0730h 1/16/2014 0949h 300.0-W Aqueous 1.11 df-cl
I SEL Analytes: CL
1401249-00ZB N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df -no2/no3
I SELAnalytes: N03N02N
1401249-003A TWN-()1_01142014 1/14/2014 1047h 1/16/2014 0949h 300.0-W Aqueous IJl df-cl
I SEL A.na~ytes: CL
1401249-003B N02/N03-W-353.2 01 df-no2/no3
1 SELAnalytes: N03N02N
1401249-004A TWN-04_01142014 1/14/2014 1227h 1/16/2014 0949h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
I SEL Analytes: CL
1401249-004B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL Analytes; N03N02N
140 1249-00SA TWN-18_01142014 1/14/2014 1312h 1116/2014 0949h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
I SEL Analyti!$: CL
1401249-00SB N02/N03-W-353.2 01 df-no2/no3
1 SELAnalytes: N03N02N
1401249-006A TWN-03_01152014 1/15/2014 0740h 1/16/2014 0949h 300.0-W Aqueous IJI df-cl
1 SELAnalytes: CL
1401249-006B N02/N03-W-353.2 IJl df-no2/oo3
I SELAnalytes: N03N02N
1401249-007 A TWN-02_01132014 1/13/2014 1430h 1/16/2014 0949h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl I
1 SELAnalytes: CL
1401249-007B N02/N03-W-353.2 IJl df-no2/no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1401249-008A TWN-65_01142014 1/14/2014 1227h 1/16/2014 0949h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
1 SEL Analyte.s: CL
1401249-00&B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SELAnalytes: N03N02N
Printed: 1/17/2014 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M Ef" RT ~ CN ~ TAT~ ac:E?"""" HOK __ HOK __ HOK __ COCEmailed
WORK ORDER Summary WorkOrder: 1401249 Page2 of2
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 1/27/2014
SampleiD Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1401249-009A ~-60 __ 01152014 1/15/2014 0700h 1/16/2014 0949h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1401249-009B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Anal)lts: N03N02N
1401249-010A Pl~1_01132014 1/13/2014 1330h 1/16/2014 0949h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
1 SELAnalytes: CL
1401249-010B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1401249-011A PIE~02_01132014 1/13/2014 1304h 1/16/2014 0949h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
1 SEL Anal tes: CL
1401249-011B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1401249-012A PIE~03_01132014 1/13/2014 1315h 1/16/2014 0949h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-ci
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1401249-012B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SELAna1ytes: N03N02N
Printed: 1117/2014 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M 0 RT 0 CN 0 TAT D QC D HOK __ _ HOK __ HOK___ COC Emailed, ____ _
CUENT:
AMERICAN WEST
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 W. 3600 S. SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84115
PHONE # [phone] ToLL FREE # [phone]
FAX it [phone] EMAIL AWALCI!>AWAL-LABS.COM
WWW.AWAJ...-LABS.COM
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
ADDREss: 6425 8. Hwy. 191
Blanding, UT 84511
CONTACT:
PHONE#:
EMAIL:
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT It:
PO#:
SAMPLER NAME:
Garrln Palmer
[phone] CELL it:
.Q>[e-mail]; KWeiiiel@enerofo."elr:sc-:,c"'om=;--------
dtur~ergyfaela.com
1st Quarter Nitrate 2014
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
ALL. ANALY.9IS WILL 81! CONDUCTeD USINCi NELAP ACCRI!DITl!D MIITHODS AND ALL DATA WILL &1! RI!PORTI!!D USINQI AWAL's
STANDARD ANALYTe LIST& AND RE!PORTINCI LIMITS (PQL) UNLBSS SPE!CIPICALLY RBQUBSTII!D onti!RWISI!I ON THIS CHAIN OP
CUSTODY AND/OR ATTACH!IO DOCUMI!!NTATION.
I QC LEVEL: 11---:URN AROUND TIME~ 11 UNU!•• OTHI!R ARRAN<>•M•NTS KAv• I!IEN ~ADI!, SIGINI!!D RI!PORTG WLL lUI
3 STANDARD I!MAll.ZD av 5:00PM ON THe DAY
____ ARI!DUB..
INCLUDE EDD:
LOCUS UPLOAD
EXCEL
FII!LD FILTERED FoR:
CDMPUANCB WITH:
0 NELAP
0 RCRA
0 CWA
0 SDWA
0 ELAP/ A2LA
0 NL.I..AP
0 NoN-COMPUANCE
0 OTHER:
KNOWN HAZARDS
&
SAMPLE COMMENTS
I tfcr! 1. Cf<f
AWAL LAB SAMPLE SET it
PAGE 1 OF
Analysis
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
N02&N03
O&G
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TP04
Procedure:
Frequency:
Preservation Check Sheet
s 1Je Set Ext'
Preservative f )._ 3 i/ ) (&,
pH<2 H2S04
PH<2 H2SO.t
pH>l2
NaOH
pH<2HN03
pH<2 H2S04 \f~ -v~ 1/~ ,;er ~~ ,V~7
PH<2HCL I II I 1/
pH<2H2S04
pH>9NaOH,
Zn Acetate I
PH<2H2SO.t
pH<2HzS04
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from Lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
7
v~
f
~ doH
y Of
ria Y6
I/
/() /I
Yt11 Yet
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
If sample is not preserved, properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag COC, notify client if requested
Place client conversation on COC
Samples may be adjusted
All samples requiring preservation
*
+
.A
#
•
The sample required additional preservative upon receipt.
The sample was received unpreserved
The Sample was received unpreserved and therefore preserved upon receipt.
The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH < 2 due to the sample matrix
The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH > __ due to the sample matrix interference
Lab Set ID: _/ o/'a I 1.t(j'
11-
Yc5
I
I
Garrin Palmer
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy 191
American West Blanding, UT 84511
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone:[phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail : [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
TEL: [phone]
RE: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2014
Dear Garrin Palmer: Lab Set ID: 1402140
American West Analytical Laboratories received 11 sample(s) on 2110/2014 for the
analyses presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AWAL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) in Utah and Texas; and is
state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, and Missouri.
All analyses were performed in accordance to the NELAP protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation scope documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
Thank You, Kyle F. DigilallysignedbyKyleF.Gross
ON: cn=Kyle F. Gross. o=AWAL.
ou=AWAL-Laboralory Director,
G email=kyle@awal~labs com, c=US r 0 s s Dale: 2014_02 17 13:36:24 -07"00"
Approved by: .._ __________ __,
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 2/17/2014 Page 1 of34
All anal) ses applicable to lhe CWA. SOWA and RCRA are performed in accordance 10 NELAC prolocols Pertinenl sampling information is located on the attached COC Confiden1lal Business Jnformalion: This report is pro,·ided for lhe e.xclusiye use of the
~ddressee Pril ile~es or sub_seq~enl ~;e of the ~~e of this .. co~pany or an) ~mber of its slaiT, or reproductio~ of this repo~ in .con~ecl•on ... with the ~vertisement, p~~mori~ or sale of~) ~rod~cl or p~ocess, ~r in ~nn~c~ion "!th lh~ r~-publication of I his report
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: (80 I) 263-8687
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Client:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Date Received:
Lab Sample ID
1402140-0108
1402140-0lOC
1402140-0 11A
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
1st Quarter Chloroform 2014
1402140
2/10/2014 1015h
Client Sample ID
TW4-60 02062014
TW4-60_02062014
Trip Blank
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Collected Matrix Analysis
2/6/2014 845h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
2/6/2014 845h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
2/4/2014 Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Report Date: 211 7/2014 Page 3 of 34
All anol)'ses applicable to the CWA1 SDWA. and RCRA are perfom1ed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached CDC Confidential Business Jnformalion: This report is provided fort he e.xclusi'e use of the
~ddressee Pri\ ile~es o,rsub ... seq~enl ~~e of the ~:u_ne of !his .con:'pany or any n_;:mber a fils slalT, or reproducti~ ~fthis repo~ in _con~ection~ with Lhe a~\'ertisement, P~?motio.n or sale of~> ~rod~ct or p~ocess, ~r in ~nm;c~ion \\'!th t~ r~~pubJication of this report
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone:[phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Inorganic Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
1st Quarter Chloroform 2014
1402140
2/10/2014
2/4, 2/5 & 2/6/2014
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation of all
samples were performed within the method holding times. All samples were properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD:
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 2/17/2014 Page 4 of34
All anal) ses applicable to the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertment sampling information is located on the anached COC Confidential Business Jnformalion: This repon rs pro,·ided for !he exclusi\·e use of the
~ddressee Pri\'ile~es o,r sub~seq~ent ~~e of the ~:u:"e of this .con:'pany or an) ~mber of its staff, or reproductio~ ~f this repo~ in ~·~u~ction .. with the ~vertisement, P~?morio.n or sale of :u!Y ~rod~ct or p~ocess, ~r in ~nn:c~ion w!th th~ r~~publication of this report
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone:[phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Volatile Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
Method:
Analysis:
1st Quarter Chloroform 2014
1402140
2/10/2014
2/4, 2/5 & 2/6/2014
Intact
None
SW-846 8260C/5030C
Volatile Organic Compounds
General Set Comments: Multiple target analytes were observed above reporting limits.
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: All samples were received in appropriate
containers and properly preserved. The analysis and preparation of all samples were
performed within the method holding times following the methods stated on the analytical
reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, and Surrogates:
Method Blanks (MBs): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCSs): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Surrogates: All surrogate recoveries were within established limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 2/17/2014 Page 5 of34
All anul)ses applicable to the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are perfom1ed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infom1ation is located on the attached COC Confidential Business Jnformalion: This repon is pro\·ided for the exclusi' e use of the
~ddressee Pri\'ile~es o:sub ... seq~nl ~~e of the ~~e of this _con.lpany or an) ~mber of its stniT. or reproductio~ ~fthis repo~ in ~1ection ... wiU1the ~Yer1isemen~ P~?molio.n or sale of~!! ~rod~cl or p~ocess, ~rILl ~nn:C~io11 w!th th~ r:-publication of this report
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1402140
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2014
Analyte Result Units
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Q_C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
Method MDL
Reporting
Limit
QC Type: LCS
Amount
Spiked
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R64819 DateAnalyzed: 02110/20141701h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.85 mg/L E300.0 0.0114 0.100 5.000 0 96.9 -Lab Sample ID: LCS-R64879 Date Analyzed: 02/1112014 1421h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.88 mg/L E300,0 0.0114 0.100 5.000 0 97.6
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R65008 Date Analyzed: 02/14/2014 1745h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-3 53.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.986 mg/L E353_..2 0.00252 0.100 1.000 0 98.6
Limits
90-110
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD Ref. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 2/17/20!4 Page 27 of34
analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling mfonnatlon is located on the attached COC Confidential Business Information Th1s report lS provided for the exclusJVe use of tbe addressee Privileges of subsequent use ofti"
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee wm be granted only on contact This
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1402140
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2014
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: MB-R64819 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride < 0.100
Lab Sample ID: MB-R64879 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride < 0.100
Lab Sample ID: MB-R65008 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) < 0.100
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
QC Type: MBLK
Reporting Amount Spike Ref.
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC
02/10/2014 1638h
mg!L E300.0 0.0114 0.100 -02/11/2014 1358h
mg!L E300,0 0.0114 0.100 -02/14/2014 1744h
mg!L E353.2 0.00252 0.100
Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 2/1712014 Page 28 of34
analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCR.A are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnatJon is located on the attached COC Confidential Business Information: Th1s report is prov1ded for the exclus1ve use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use of ti-
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1402140
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2014
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: 1402140-00SAMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 5.16
Lab Sample ID: 1402075-001 G MS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 5,140
Lab Sample ID: 1402140-004BMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 15.1
Lab Sample ID: 1402249-002DMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.02
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Reporting
Units Method MDL Limit
02/11/2014 024h
mg/L E300.0 0.0114 0.100 -02/1112014 1554h
mg/L E300 0 11.4 100
02/14/2014 1822h
mg!L E3532 0.0252 1.00
02/14/2014 1824h
mg/L E353 2 0.00252 0.100
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
QCType: MS
Amount Spike Ref.
Spiked Amount %REC
5.000 0 103
5,000 409 94.7
10.00 4.24 108
1.000 0.0286 99.0
Limits
90-110
90-llO
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD Ref. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 2/17/2014 Page 29 of 34
analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC Confidential Business Information: Th1s report is prov1ded for the exclusive use of the addressee Privlleges of subsequent use oft~
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproductiOn of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone] Laboratory Director
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Lab Set ID: 1402140 Dept: we
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2014 QCType: MSD
Reporting Amount Spike Ref. RPDRef. RPD
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC Limits Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Lab Sample ID: 1402140-00SAMSD Date Analyzed: 02/11/2014 047h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 5.22 mg!L E300.0 0.0114 0.100 5.000 0 104 90-110 5.16 1.12 20 -Lab Sample ID: 1402075-001 GMSD Date Analyzed: 02/1112014 1618h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 5,180 mg!L E300 0 11.4 100 5,000 409 95.5 90-110 5140 0.820 20
Lab Sample ID: 1402140-004BMSD Date Analyzed: 02/14/2014 1823h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 14.6 mg!L E353 2 0.0252 1.00 10.00 4.24 104 90-110 15.1 3.17 10
Lab Sample ID: 1402249-002DMSD Date Analyzed: 02/14/2014 1826h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.05 mg!L E353.2 0.00252 0.100 1.000 0.0286 103 90-110 1.02 3.38 10
ReportDate: 2/17/2014 Page30of34
analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC Conf1dential Business Information This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use oftf
ne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This
American West Analytical Laboratories UL
Denison
WORK ORDER Summary WorkOrder: 1402140 Page 1 of2
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 2/19/2014
Client ID: DEN100 Contact: Garrin Pahner
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2014 QC Level: III WO Type: Project
Comments: PA Rush. QC 3 (Summary/No chromatograms). RL of 1 ppm for Chloride and VOC and 0.1 ppm for N02/N03. Expected levels provided by client-see
Jenn. J-flag what we can't meet. ElM Locus and EDD-Denison. Email Group.;
SampleiD Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1402140-001A TW4-21_02052014 2/5/2014 0825h 2/10/2014 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SELAnalytes: CL
1402140-00 I B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SELAnalytes: N03N02N
1402140-001C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 41# ofSurr: 4
1402140-002A TW4-29 _ 02052014 2/5/2014 0842h 2/10/2014 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Anafytes : CL
1402140-002B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL Ana{Jites: N03N02N
1402140-002C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
1402140-003A TW4-11_02052014 2/5/2014 0859h 2/10/2014 101 Sh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL tfna/yics: CL
1402140-003B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1402140-003C 8260-W !ia VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 41# ofSurr: 4
1402140-004A TW4-07_02052014 2/5/2014 0910h 2/10/2014 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL 4nalytes: CL
1402140-004B N02/N03-W-353.2 VI df-no2/no3
I SEL Ana~vtt:s: N03N02N
1402140-004C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4/# ofSurr: 4
1402140-00SA TW4-01_02052014 2/5/2014 0923h 2/10/2014 101 Sh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-we
'/ SBL ilnalyies: CL
1402140-0058 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL .Analyte:r: N03N02N
1402140-00SC 8260-W 0 VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Ana/ytes: 4/# ofSurr: 4
1402140-006A TW4-10_02052014 2/5/2014 0934h 2/10/2014 101Sh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SELAnalytes: CL
Printed: 2/1 0/2014 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M g/ RT g.-' CN ff" TAT ~ QC ~ HOK~ HOK __ HOK __
WORK ORDER Summary WorkOrder: 1402140 Page2 of2
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 2/19/2014
SampleiD Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1402140-006B TW4-10_02052014 2/5/2014 0934h 2/10/2014 1015h N02/N03-W-353.2 Aqueous J)Z] df-no2/no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1402140-006C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 1# q{Surr: 4
1402140-007A TW4-02_02062014 2/6/2014 0818h 2/10/2014 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous VI df-wc
1 SEL Analytts: CL
1402140-007B N02/N03-W-353.2 0 df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analyfes: N03N02N
1402140-007C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 1# ofSurr: 4
1402140-00SA TW4-29R_02042014 2/4/2014 llllh 2/10/20141015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SELAnaly{es: CL
1402140-00SB N02/N03-W-353.2 IJI df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1402140-00SC 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4/# ofSu": 4
1402140-009A TW4-08_02062014 Re Sample 2/6/2014 0825h 2/10/2014 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous VI df-wc
1SELAnalJ:_tes: CL
1402140-009B N02/N03-W-353.2 VI df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1402140-009C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test GrotgJ: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
1402140-010A TW4-60_02062014 2/6/2014 0845h 2/10/2014 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL A.na{ytes: CL
1402140-010B N02/N03-W-353.2 VI df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1402140-0lOC 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
1402140-011A Trip Blank 2/4/2014 2/10/2014 1015h 8260-W Aqueous ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 41 #of Surr: 4
Printed: 2/1 0/2014 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M 0 RT 0 CN 0 TAT 0 QCO HOK __ HOK __ _ HOK___ COC Emailed,_ ___ _
American West
Analytical Laboratories
463 W. 3600 S. Salt Lake City, UT 64115
Phone# [phone] Toll Free # (868) 263.a686
Fax# [phone] Email awal@awal~abs.com
www.awal-labs.com
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Address: 6425 S. Hwy. 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Phone#: [phone] Cell#: ; __ ::;s :=-z:: , ,...~~®"'JleriYfUeJS.com; KWeiiiiil@enere;yfn::el;:s~.c=o=m=; ---------
Email: [e-mail]
Project Name: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2014
Project#:
PO#:
Sampler Name: Garrin Palmer, Tanner Holliday
CHAIN OF CUSTODY /L/<J 2. !'/ 0
All analysis will be conducted using NELAP accredlted methods and all data will be reported using AWAL's standard analyte lists and reporting
limits (POL) unless speciHcally requested othervdse on this Chain of Custody and/or attached documentation.
AWAL Lab Sample Set#
1 of 1 I QC ~evel: I
0'
0 0 0)
Turn Around Time:
Standard
Unless other arrangements have been made,
signed reports will be emailed by 5:00pm on
the day they are due.
Include EDD:
LOCUS UPLOAD
EXCEL
Compliance With:
NELAP
RCRA
CWA
SDWA
ELAPI A2LA
NLLAP
Non-Compliance
Other:
Known Hazards
&
Comments
See the Analytical Scope of Work for Reporting Limits and VOC
list.
-Analytical Scope ofWork.
Mesa Mill Blanding Utah
11 of13
or
SW8260C
SW8260B
or
SW8260C
SW8260B
Chloride)
1.0 ).lg/L 14days HClto :56°C
l.O).lg/L 14 days HCltopH<2
1.0/lg/L 14 days HCltopH<2 :56°C
Analysis
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
N02&N03
O&G
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TP04
Procedure:
Frequency:
Preservation Check Sheet
s Le Set E
Preservative I 2-> i y co
pH<2 H2S04
pH <2H2S04
pH>l2
NaOH
pH<2HN03
pH<2H2S04 y'o; yc' .Yc~ Y'e ~ J-e5 yeo;
pH<2HCL 7 / II f
pH<2H2S04
pH>9NaOH,
ZnAcetate
pH<2H2S04
pH<2H2S04
----~
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from Lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
7
Yc-")
I/
doH
¥' I ~
/~ ye5
10
yc}
I'
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
If sample is not preserved, properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag COC, notify client if requested
Place client conversation on COC
Samples may be adjusted
All samples requiring preservation
*
+ ..
#
•
The sample required additional preservative upon receipt.
The sample was received unpreserved
The Sample was received unpreserved and therefore preserved upon receipt.
The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH < 2 due to the sample matrix
The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH > __ due to the sample matrix interference
Lab SetiD: ft!O 21 lfG
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Garrin Palmer
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
TEL: [phone]
RE: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2014
Dear Garrin Palmer: Lab Set ID: 1401525
American West Analytical Laboratories received 18 sample(s) on 1131/2014 for the
analyses presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AWAL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) in Utah and Texas; and is
state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, and Missouri.
All analyses were performed in accordance to the NELAP protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation scope documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
Thank You,
Approved by:
Ky I e F . Digitally signed by Kyle F. Gross
ON: cn=Kyle F. Gross. o=AWAL.
ou=AWAL·Laboratory Director,
G email::::[e-mail], c=US ross Dale:2014.021011:5j:31-07"00'
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 2/10/2014 Page I of 49
All analyses applicable to the CW.!J.,.. SDWA. and RCRA. are performet.l in acconl;mce to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infom1ation is located on lhe a.ttachc:d COC. Confidential Business Jofolll\3tion: This n:por1 is provided for the exclusiYc use of the
~tld~-c Pri\·ile~cs o!s~~n1 ~of the ~c of this .con.'pany or any ~her of its ~taff. or rcpm~uC1lo~ ~~this n--po~ in ~on~"C1ion ... •v11h 1hc ~~crti~~nl. ~~motio.n o_r ~lc of ~~Y. ~rod~cl or ~ess, ~r in :on~c~ion w!th th~ r:_-puhlication of this rep01
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2014
Lab SetiD: 1401525
Date Received: 1/31/2014 919h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
463 West 3600 South 1401525-001A TW4-09 01292014 1129/2014 740h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
)alt Lake City, UT 84115 1401525-0018 TW4-09 01292014 1/29/2014 740h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1401525-00lC TW4-09_01292014 1/29/2014 740h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Phone: (801 ) 263-8686 1401525-002A MW-32_01292014 1129/2014 1305h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1401525-0028 MW-32 01292014 1129/2014 1305h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Toll Free: [phone] 1401525-002C MW-32_01292014 1129/2014 1305h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Fax: [phone]C/5030C
~-mail: [e-mail] 1401525-003A TW4-25 01272014 1/27/2014 1338h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1401525-0038 TW4-25 01272014 1127/2014 1338h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
web : www.awal-labs.com 1401525-003C TW4-25 01272014 1127/2014 1338h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1401525-004A TW4-26 01292014 1129/2014 750h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Kyle F. Gross 1401525-0048 TW4-26 01292014 1129/2014 750h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
140 1525-004C TW4-26 01292014 1129/2014 750h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Laboratory Director 8260C/5030C
1401525-005A TW4-06_01292014 1129/2014 758h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Jose Rocha 1401525-0058 TW4-06 01292014 1/29/2014 758h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
QAOfficer 1401525-005C TW4-06 01292014 1129/2014 758h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1401525-006A TW4-16 01292014 1129/2014 805h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1401525-0068 TW4-16_01292014 1/29/2014 805h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1401525-006C TW4-16 01292014 1129/2014 805h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1401525-007A TW4-05 01302014 1130/2014 718h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1401525-0078 TW4-05_01302014 1130/2014 718h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1401525-007C TW4-05 01302014 1/30/2014 718h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1401525-008A TW4-24 01272014 1/27/2014 1355h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1401525-0088 TW4-24_01272014 1127/2014 1355h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1401525-008C TW4-24_01272014 1127/2014 1355h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1401525-009A TW4-18 01302014 1/30/2014 733h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1401525-0098 TW4-18 01302014 1/30/2014 733h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
140 1525-009C TW4-18 01302014 1/30/2014 733h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1401525-010A TW4-33 01302014 1/30/2014 750h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1401525-0108 TW4-33 01302014 1/30/2014 750h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Report Date: 2/10/2014 Page2 of49
AU :ma))"SCS applicable to lh~: CWA. SDWA. and RCR...<\ ::~re pcrformetl in accordance lo NELAC prolocols. Pertinenl sampling information i~ Jocatl!d on the attached COC. Confidential Busioess lnfonnation: This rcpon is pnJ\rided for the e~clusivc use of the
~n::sste. Pmil~es o~ su~~t ~of the ~c of this .con.lpany or nny ~mber of its staff. or rcprodoc~ ~flbis repo~ in ~~cditm_. \\ith the ~·crti<;.C~"flt. ~otiQ!' or sale of !~Y J?"od~t or p~ess, ~r in ~onn:_c~ion w!th 1~ re-publication oflhls rcpon
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: I st Quarter Chloroform 2014
Lab SetiD: 1401525
Date Received: 1/31/2014 919h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
1401525-0IOC TVV4-33_01302014 1/30/2014 750h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
463 VVest 3600 South 8260C/5030C
1401525-0IIA TVV4-19 01272014 1/27/2014 1510h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
)a1t Lake City, UT 84115 1401525-0IIB TVV4-19 01272014 1/27/2014 1510h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1401525-011C TVV4-19_01272014 1/27/2014 1510h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1401525-012A TVV4-04_01272014 1/27/2014 1433h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Phone: [phone] 1401525-0128 TVV4-04 01272014 1/27/2014 1433h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Toll Free: [phone] 1401525-012C TVV4-04_01272014 1/27/2014 1433h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Fax: [phone]C/5030C
~-mail: [e-mail] 1401525-0BA MVV-04 01272014 1/27/2014 1425h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1401525-0138 MVV-04 01272014 1/27/2014 1425h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
web: www.awal-labs.com 1401525-0BC MVV-04 01272014 1/27/2014 1425h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1401525-014A MVV-26_01272014 1/27/2014 1420h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1401525-0148 MVV-26 01272014 1127/2014 1420h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2 Kyle F. Gross 1401525-014C MVV-26 01272014 1/27/2014 1420h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Laboratory Director 8260C/5030C
1401525-015A TVV4-22_01272014 1127/2014 1403h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Jose Rocha 1401525-0158 TVV4-22 01272014 1/27/2014 1403h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
QA Officer 1401525-015C TVV4-22_01272014 1/27/2014 1403h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1401525-016A TVV4-20 01272014 1/27/2014 1412h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1401525-0168 TVV4-20 01272014 1/27/2014 1412h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1401525-016C TVV4-20 _01272014 1/27/2014 1412h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1401525-017A TVV4-70_01292014 1/29/2014 1305h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1401525-0178 TVV4-70_01292014 1/29/2014 1305h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1401525-017C TVV4-70 01292014 1/29/2014 1305h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1401525-018A Trip Blank 1/27/2014 Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Report Date: 2/10/2014 Page 3 of 49
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SOWA. and R(;RA are rerformec.l in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinenl sampling iJJfonnation i." loc:ttcd on the altac.:hed COC Confidential Busincs..o; lnfom1ation.: This ~purt i:s prmided for lhc exdusi\'t: liS(' of the
~ddressce. Pm;l~ o~ sub~~ent ~of the ~~'."cor this _co~pany or any ~bcr of its staff, or rcproducti~ ~~this repo~ in ~n~--ction~ with tbc ~~crti--c~nl, r;omotio_n ~r ~lc of ~~y-~rod~c1 or rt:occss, ~r in :on~~ion w~tb tl~ ':~blicarion or this repor
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Inorganic Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
1st Quarter Chloroform 2014
1401525
113112014
1127, 1129 & 1130/2014
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation of all
samples were performed within the method holding times. All samples were properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD:
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 2/10/2014 Page 4 of 49
All analyses applicable lo lhe CWA. SDWA, and RCRA arc rcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling info~tion is located on the attache«l COC. Con1idcntiul Business Jnfonnation: ntis repor1 is prmided fiJI" lhe cxcJu:sn·r: use of the
~ressce. Pri\·ile~cs o~ sub .. se~ent ~·;-e of the ~~~c of this ,con;pany or any ~bcr ofils slaff. or reproducti~ ~~this rcpo~ in ~~cdioo~ wi1h the ~crtiscmL."Il1, ~moti~n ~r ~le of :n!Y ~?fodoct ur ~css, ~r in ~~tioo w!th the n;-)lUbliriltion of this repor
ANAl YTICAl lABOAATORII S
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Volatile Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
Method:
Analysis:
1st Quarter Chloroform 2014
1401525
1131/2014
1127, 1/29 & 1/30/2014
Intact
None
SW -846 8260C/5030C
Volatile Organic Compounds
General Set Comments: Multiple target analytes were observed above reporting limits.
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: All samples were received in appropriate
containers and properly preserved. The analysis and preparation of all samples were
performed within the method holding times following the methods stated on the analytical
reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, and Surrogates:
Method Blanks (MBs): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCSs): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Surrogates: All surrogate recoveries were within established limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 2/10/2014 Page 5 of 49
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA ar~ performed in accordance lo NELAC protocols. Pertinenl sampling information is Jocate..J on lhe attached COC Confidential Business lnfo.rmalioo: Thi~ repm1 is pl"l»i~tl fllT1hc: e:\dusive use of Ox:
~ressec. PriYile~cs o~ suh~scq~ ~of the ~~e of1his _co~pany or any n~mber of its stnff. or rcproducti~ ~~lhi:s repo~ in ~o~dion~ wilh the ~~·crti~nl, 5~omo1ic:n ~r sale of ~~y ~~1 (ff ~~ ~r m ~~ion "~h 1~ ~-p~bhcalion of this rep01
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1401525
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2014
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: 1401525-0lOBDUP Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 2.66
Units
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
QC Type: DUP
Reporting Amount Spike Ref.
Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC
02/07/2014 16l7h
mg/L E353.2 0.0252 0.100
Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit
2.56 3.75 20
Qual
ReportDate: 2/10/2014 Page4l of49
i analyses applicable to tlw CWA, SDWA, and RCRA an: pcrfonncd in uc:c;:ordancc to NELAC protocols, Pertinent sampling informutiun is located on the attached COC. Contidcutial Busiw.;ss Information: This rcporl is provided for the exclusive u:;c of the uddrcssc<.·. Privileges of subsequent usc ofth
uc of this comoanv or nnv member of its staff: or reproduction of rhis rcporl in conm:ction wirh the advcltiscmcnl, promotion or sale of any product or procc~s. 01 in connection with the n:-publication of this report fm tmy purpose othl!r than forth~ adtlr~s~cc will be &,'TUn ted only on conlact. This
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1401525
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2014
Analyte Result Units
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC_SUMMARY REP_ORT_
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
Method MDL
Reporting
Limit
QC Type: LCS
Amount
Spiked
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R64539 Date Analyzed: 02/03/20 14 1636h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R64707
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R64463
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N)
Lab Sample ID: LCS N03-R64726
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N)
4.90
Date Analyzed:
4.88
Date Analyzed:
0.955
Date Analyzed:
0.972
mg/L E300.0
02/06/2014 1954h
mg/L E300.0 -01/31/2014 1511h
mg/L E353.2 -02/07/2014 1554h
mg/L E353.2
O.oi14 0.100 5.000 0 97.9
0.0114 0.100 5.000 0 97.5
0.00252 0.100 1.000 0 95.5
0.00252 0.0100 1.000 0 97.2
Limits
90-110
90-110
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 2/10/2014 Page 42 of49
l analyses npplicabl.:.: to the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA me pcrfom1cc.l in "ccordancc to NELAC protocols. Pcrlincnt ~ampJing information is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc oftl1
11c of thjs company or any mcmbc1"of its staff: or roproduction of thi~ report in connection with the ac.Jvcrtiscmcnt. promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than forth~ ud<.lresscc will bt: granted only on contact. This
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1401525
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2014
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: MB-R64539 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0·W
Chloride <0.100
Lab Sample ID: MB-R64707 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride <0.100
Lab Sample ID: MB-R64463 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) <0.100
Lab Sample ID: MB-R64726 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) < 0.0100
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
QC Type: MBLK
Reporting Amount Spike Ref.
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC
02/03/20 14 1609h
mg/L E300.0 0.0114 0.100
02/06/2014 193lh
mg/L E300.0 O.otl4 0.100 -01/31/2014 l509h
mg/L E353.2 0.00252 0.100
02/07/2014 1551h
mg/L E353.2 0.00252 0.0100
Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD Ref. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 2/ I 0/20 14 Page 43 of 49
I nnulyses upplicH.blc to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA urc pcrforml.!d in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is lucatcd on the attached COC~ Confidential Business Information: This r~port i~ provided fur the exclusive usc of the ndd~scc Privileges of subsequent usc ofth
nc of this company or any member of its start~ or n.:production of this n:porl in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in con nee lion with the re-publication uf this rcporl for any purp<lSC other thun for the uddrcssc..: will be granted only on contact Thi:;;
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1401525
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2014
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: 1401525-001AMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 259
Lab Sample ID: 1401525-003AMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 578
Lab Sample ID: 1401525-00JBMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 11.9
Lab Sample ID: 1401525-00SBMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 124
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: (80 I) 263-8686, Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Q_C SUMMARY REPORT
Reporting
Units Method MDL Limit
02/03/2014 2300h
mg/L E300.0 0.570 5.00
02/06/2014 2041h
mg/L E300.0 1.14 10.0
01 /31/2014 1520h
mg/L E353.2 0.0252 1.00
01/31/2014 1552h
mg/L E353.2 0.252 10.0
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
QCType: MS
Amount Spike Ref.
Spiked Amount %REC
250.0 22 94.6
500.0 85.7 98.6
10.00 2.16 97.6
100.0 31.6 92.7
Limits
90-ItO
90. 110
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD Ref. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 2/ l 0/20 14 Page 44 of 49
i analyses upplicablc to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA 1.1rc pcrf01mcd in uccorduncc to NELAC p10tocots. Pertinent sampling informution is located on the attached COC~ Confidential Busint·ss Information: This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc ofth
nc of this comnanv or unv member of it~ stu fT. or rcoroduclion of this rcoort in connection with the advertisement. momolion or sale ofanv oroduct or process. or in connection with the rc~publication of this report for any purpm:;c other thun for the addressee will be ~TJ"Untcd only on contact. This
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: (801 ) 263-8686, Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone] Laboratory Director
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES _QC SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Lab Set ID: 1401525 Dept: we
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2014 QCType: MSD
--------· ---
Reporting Amount Spike Ref. RPDRef. RPD
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC Limits Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Lab Sample ID: 1401525-00IAMSD Date Analyzed: 02/03/2014 2327h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 264 mg!L E300.0 0.570 5.00 250.0 22 96.7 90-110 259 2.06 20 -Lab Sample ID: 1401525-00JAMSD Date Analyzed: 02/06/2014 2104h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 572 mg!L E300.0 1.14 10.0 500.0 85.7 97.3 90-110 578 1.14 20
Lab Sample JD: 1401525-003BMSD Date Analyzed: 01/31/2014 1521h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 12.5 mg/L E353.2 0.0252 1.00 10.00 2.16 103 90-110 11.9 4.51 10
Lab Sample ID: 1401525-00SBMSD Date Analyzed: 01/31/2014 1554h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 131 mg!L E353.2 0.252 10.0 100.0 31.6 99.8 90-110 124 5.55 10
Report Date: 2/ I 0/20 14 Page 45 of 49
1 ana. lyses applicabh: to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc performed in accordum:c to NELAC p1olocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC, Confidential Business lnformation: This report is provided for the exclusive u~c of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of th
11c of this compWly or any member of its stntT, or reproduction of this l'cport in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection wirh the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be gmnted only on contact. This
American West Analytical Laboratories UL
Denison
WORK ORDER Summary WorkOrder: 1401525
Due Date: 2/11/2014
Page 1 of3
Client:
ClientiD:
Project:
Comments:
SampleiD
1401525-001A
1401525-0018
1401525-001C
1401525-002A
1401 525-002B
1401 525-002C
1401525-003A
1401525-0038
1401 525-003C
1401525-004A
1401S25-004B
1401525-004C
1401525-005A
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
DENlOO Contact: Garrin Palmer
1st Quarter Chloroform 2014 QC Level: III WO Type: Project
PARush. QC 3 (Summary/No chromatograms). RL ofl ppm for Chloride and VOC and 0.1 ppm forN02/N03. Expected levels provided by client-see
Jenn. J-flag what we can't meet. ElM Locus and EDD-Denison. Email Group.;
Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
TW4-09_01292014 1129/2014 0740h 1/31/2014 0919h 300.0-W Aqueous I!ZI df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SELAnalytes: N03N02N
8260-W ~ VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 41# ofSurr: 4 -~-32_01292014 1/29/2014 1305h 1131/2014 0919h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SELAna/ytes: CL
N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analyles: N03N02N
8260-W ~ VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 41# ofSurr: 4
TW4-25_01272014 1127/2014 1338h 1131/2014 0919h 300.0-W Aqueous li2l df-wc
1 SELAnalytes: CL
N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
8260-W ~ VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 41 #of Surr: 4 -TW4-26~01292014 1/29/2014 0750h 1131/2014 0919h 300.0-W Aqueous ~· df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL-AIIf11)'/f!.S: N03N02N
8260-W li2l VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4/# ofSurr: 4 -
TW4-06_01292014 1/29/2014 0758h 1/31/2014 0919h 300.0-W Aqueous b2l df-wc
1 SELAnalytes: CL
3
3
I·
3
3
1401525-00SB NO?INQ).$.353., !i1 elf-nollr.M---------
1 SEL Arralytes: N03N02N
1401525-005C 8260-W li2J VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4/# ofSurr: 4
1401525-006A TW4-16_01292014 1/29/2014 0805h l/3I/20140919h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SEL Analytes: CL
Printed: 2/312014 FORLABORATORYUSEONLY[filloutonpage1]: %M ~ RT 12] CN [3"'"' TAT-!2r QC~ HOK __ HOK __ _ I HOK___ COC Emailed t "/' l ~
WORK ORDER Summary WorkOrder: 1401525 Page2 of3
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 2/11/2014
SampleiD Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1401525-006B 1LVV4-16_01292014 1/29/2014 0805h 1/31/2014 0919h N02/N03-W-353.2 Aqueous ~ df-no2/no3
1 SELAnalytes: N03N02N
1401525-006C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1401525-007A 1LVV4-05_01302014 1/30/2014 0718h 1/31/2014 0919h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Antilytu: CL
1401525-007B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1401525-007C 8260-W 0 VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1401525-00SA TW4-24_01272014 1/27/2014 1355h 1/3112014 0919h 300.0-W Aqueous rJl df-wc J.
1 SEL Ana/ytes: CL
1401525-00SB N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1401525-00SC 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1401525-009A TW4-18_01302014 . 1/30/2014 0733h 1/31/2014 0919h 300.0-W Aqueous VI df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1401525-009B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SELAnalytes: N03N02N
1401525-009C 8260-W till VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# of Surr: 4
1401525-010A 1LVV4-33-01302014 1/30/2014 0750h 1/31/2014 0919h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SELAllalytes: CL
1401525-0IOB N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Ana/yres: N03N02N
1401525-0lOC 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Ana/ytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1401525-011A TW4-19 _01272014 1/27/2014 1510h 1/31/2014 0919h 300.0-W Aqueous IJI df-wc
1 SEL A11algtes: ~L
1401525-0llB N02/N03-W-353.2 1\il df. no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1401525-011C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test (:Jwnp. 8%60-~~Cu::;wm, # (1/A:natyzes . .; f # (I[Surr. 4
1401525-012A 1LVV4-04_01272014 1127/2014 1433h 1/31/2014 0919h 300.0-W Aqueous 0 df-wc
I SEL Ana/ytes: CL
1401525-012B N02/N03-W-353.2 21 df-no2/no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
Printed: 1/31/2014 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M D RTO CN 0 TAT 0 QCO HOK __ HOK ___ HOK ___ COC Emailed
WORK ORDER Summary WorkOrder: 1401525 Page3 of3
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 2/11/2014
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1401525-012C 1LVV4-04_01272014 1/27/2014 1433h 1/31/2014 0919h 8260-W Aqueous ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1401525-013A ~~_01272014 1127/2014 1425h 1/31/2014 0919h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SEL AtJalyte.r: CL
1401525-0138 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Ana/ytes: N03N02N
1401525-013C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# of Surr: 4
1401525-014A ~-26_01272014 1/2712014 1420h 1/31/2014 0919h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc 1
1 SEL 4nalyt.es: CL
1401525-0148 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Alla/ytes: N03N02N
1401525-014C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group; 8260-W-Custom; # qf Ana~vtes: 4 I # of Surr; 4
1401525-015A TW4-22_01272014 1/27/2014 1403h 1/31/2014 0919h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SEL Aualyles: CL
1401525-0158 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SELAlmlytes: N03N02N
1401525-015C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Ana/ytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1401525-016A TW4-20_01272014 1/27/2014 1412h 1/31/2014 0919h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL A11aiytes·: CL
1401525-0168 N02/N03-W-353.2 IJ1 df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1401525-016C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1401525-017A TW4-70_01292014 1129/2014 1305h 1/31/2014 0919h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1401525-0178 N02/N03-W-353.2 r.ll df-no2/no3
1 SEL-Analyte.r: N03N02N
1401525-017C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# of Surr: 4
1401525-0l&A Trip Blank 1/27/2014 1131/2014 0919h 8260-W Aqueous ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-CUitom:il of A11alytes: 4141 ofSurr: 4
Printed: 1/31/2014 FORLABORATORYUSEONLY[filloutonpage1]; %M 0 RT 0 CN 0 TAT 0 QCO HOK __ _ HOK __ _ HOK___ COC Emailed.__ ___ _
American West
Analytical Laboratories
463W.3600S. Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone# [phone] Toll Free# [phone]
Fax# [phone] Email [e-mail]
www.awal-labs.com
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Address: 6425 S. Hwy. 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Contact: Garrin Palmer
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
All analysis will be conducted using NELAP accredited methods and all data will be reported using AWAL's standard analytellsta and reporting
limits (PQL) unless spoc!Hcally requested olheiWiee on lhis Chain of Custody -nf olld.d -....oMn!fcrt,
I QC ~evel: 1 Tum Around Time:
Standard
other arrangementa have been made,
signed reporl8 will be emalled by 5:00pm on
the day they are due,
Include EDD:
LOCUS UPLOAD
EXCitL
Reid Filtered For:
Compliance With: Phone#: [phone] Cell#: I NELAP
RCRA
CWA
SDWA
Email: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Project Name: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2014
Project#:
PO#:
Sampler Name: Garrin Palmer, Tanner Holliday
I
&
ci 0 "l
El.AP I A2l.A
NLLAP
Known Hazards
&
Comments
1 ¥o Is t_S
AWAL Lab Sample Set# .
Page 1 of l-
~~~~
American West
Analytical Laboratories
463W.3600S. Sa\LLakeCity,UT 84115
Phone#(801)263-a565 Toll Free# (aaa)263-B6B6
Fax# [phone] Email awal@awa~labs.com
www.awal-labs.com
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Address: 6425 S. Hwy. 191
Contact:
Phone#: [phone] Cllll
Email: ~~re;y{uabo.C<Qpl
Project Name: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2014
Project#:
PO#:
Sampler Name: Garrin Palmer, Tanner Holliday
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
All enalysls will b& conduclad using NELAP accredited methods and i!!ll data wm be l'l!lported using AWAL's standard anslyte lists and reporting
llmlls (PQL) unless specifically requealed otharwtse on lhls Chain of Cuslcdy and/or aUachad doeumentallon. I QC ~evel: --_1 I _. ..... ___ I , Turn Arounu 1 nmr;
Standard
)( Include EDD:
LOCUS UPLOAD
EXCEL
Field F\~ered For.
Compliance With:
NELAP
RCRA
CWA
SDWA
ELAP/ A2LA
NLLAP
Non--Compliance
Other:
Known Hazards
&
!Yo!Sz_s
AWAL Lab Sample Set#
2_
See the Analytical Scope of Work for Reporting Limits and VOC
list.
-Analytical Scope of Work
Mesa Mill Blanding Utah
11 of13
or
SW8260C
SW8260B
or
SW8260C
SW8260B
or
SW8260C
SW8260B
or
SW8260C
1.0
1.0~-tg/L
1.0~-tg/L
14 days
14 days HCl topH<2 ~6°C
14 days HCl topH<2 ~
14 days HCl topH<2 ~6°C
Analysis
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
N02&N03
O&G
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TP04
.
Procedure:
Frequency:
Preservation Check Sheet
s le Set Ext'
Preservative I J._ 3 lf ) {p
pH <ZH2S04
pH<2H2SO<t
pH>12
NaOH
pH<2HN03
pH<2 H2S04 I Yrs v~e, !kf lv.,., y;.r ~c;
pH<2HCL I' l/ I/
pH<2 H2S04
pH>9NaOH,
ZnAcetate
pH<2H2S04
pH<2H2S04
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from Lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
7
Vr,~~
i
----------doH
? f
J/s.1 Yc5
I'
/~ II
Yc'i Vc~
I /
-
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
If sample is not preserved, properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag COC, notify client if requested
Place client conversation on COC
Samples may be adjusted
All samples requiring preservation
*
+
....
#
•
The sample required additional preservative upon receipt.
The sample was received unpreserved
The Sample was received unpreserved and therefore preserved upon receipt.
The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH < 2 due to the sample matrix
The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH > __ due to the sample matrix interference
Lab Set ID: /'( 0/ S Z... S
/L. 13 /'-/ tS /G 17
I
I
r/,.( V'c::~ ~f Jles Ve') ~,-I
/ I' I' v
-
TabH
Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
H-1 Field Data Evaluation
2x Volume Cheek
NC = Not Calculated
TWN-2, TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-25 are continuously pumping wells.
Piezometers 1, 2, and 3 were not pumped, only one set of parameters were taken.
TWN-3 and TWN-7 were pumped dry and sampled after recovery.
NM =Not Measured. The QAP does not require the measurement of redox potential or turbidity in wells that were purged to dryness.
H-2: Holding Time Evaluation
Hold Time Allowed Hold Hold Time
Location ID Parameter Name Sample Date Analysis Date (Daysl Time (Days) Check
PIEZ-01 Chloride 1113/2014 1/21/2014 8 28 OK
PIEZ-01 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1113/2014 1122/2014 9 28 OK
PIEZ-02 Chloride 1/13/2014 1/2112014 8 28 OK
PIEZ-02 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1113/2014 1/22/2014 9 28 OK
PIEZ-03 Chloride 1113/2014 1121/2014 8 28 OK
PIEZ-03 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1/13/2014 1/22/2014 9 28 OK
TWN-01 Chloride 1/14/2014 1120/2014 6 28 OK
TWN-01 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1114/2014 1122/2014 8 28 OK
TWN-02 Chloride 1113/2014 1120/2014 7 28 OK
TWN-02 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1113/2014 1/22/2014 9 28 OK
TWN-03 Chloride 1/15/2014 1/20/2014 5 28 OK
TWN-03 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1/15/2014 1122/2014 7 28 OK
TWN-04 Chloride 1/14/2014 1120/2014 6 28 OK
TWN-04 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1/14/2014 1122/2014 8 28 OK
TWN-07 Chloride 1115/2014 1/20/2014 5 28 OK
TWN-07 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1115/2014 1122/2014 7 28 OK
TWN-07R Chloride 1114/2014 1120/2014 6 28 OK
TWN-07R Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1114/2014 1/22/2014 8 28 OK
TWN-18 Chloride 1114/2014 1120/2014 6 28 OK
TWN-18 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1114/2014 1122/2014 8 28 OK
TW4-22 Chloride 1/27/2014 2/4/2014 8 28 OK
TW4-22 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1127/2014 113112014 4 28 OK
TW4-24 Chloride 1127/2014 2/4/2014 8 28 OK
TW4-24 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1127/2014 113112014 4 28 OK
TW4-25 Chloride 1127/2014 2/6/2014 10 28 OK
TW4-25 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1127/2014 113112014 4 28 OK
TW4-60 Chloride 2/6/2014 211112014 5 28 OK
TW4-60 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 2/6/2014 2114/2014 8 28 OK
TWN-60 Chloride 1115/2014 1121/2014 6 28 OK
TWN-60 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1115/2014 1122/2014 7 28 OK
TWN-65 Chloride 1114/2014 112112014 7 28 OK
TWN-65 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1/14/2014 1122/2014 8 28 OK
H-3: Analytical Method Check
Pa-..~,meter MelliO"U-'Method l(Jsed by· ~b
Nitrate E353.1 or E353.2 E353.2
A4500-Cl B or A4500-Cl E
Chloride or E300.0 E300.0
Both Nitrate and Chloride were analyzed with the correct analytical method.
-eporung nmt ec H4R L' . Ch k
Required
Lab Reporting Reporting
Location Analyte Limit Units Qualifier Limit Units RLCheck
PIEZ-01 Chloride 10 mg/L 1 mg!L OK
PIEZ-01 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1 mg!L 0.1 mg!L OK
PIEZ-02 Chloride 2 mg!L 1 mg!L OK
PIEZ-02 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg!L 0.1 mg!L OK
PIEZ-03 Chloride 5 mg!L 1 mg!L OK
PIEZ-03 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.2 mg!L 0.1 mg!L OK
TWN-01 Chloride 5 mg!L 1 mg/L OK
TWN-01 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg!L 0.1 mg/L OK
TWN-02 Chloride 10 mg!L 1 mg!L OK
TWN-02 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10 mg!L 0.1 mg!L OK
TWN-03 Chloride 50 mg!L 1 mg!L OK
TWN-03 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10 mg_!L 0.1 mg_/L OK
TWN-04 Chloride 5 mg!L 1 mg!L OK
TWN-04 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg!L 0.1 mg/L OK
TWN-07 Chloride 1 mg!L 1 mg!L OK
TWN-07 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg!L 0.1 mg!L OK
TWN-07R Chloride 1 mg!L u 1 mg!L OK
TWN-07R Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L u 0.1 mg!L OK
TWN-18 Chloride 10 mg)L 1 mg!L OK
TWN-18 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1 mg!L 0.1 mg!L OK
TW4-22 Chloride 100 mg!L 1 mg!L OK
TW4-22 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10 mg!L 0.1 mg!L OK
TW4-24 Chloride 500 mg_/L 1 mg_/L OK
TW4-24 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10 mg!L 0.1 mg!L OK
TW4-25 Chloride 10 mg!L 1 mg!L OK
TW4-25 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK
TW4-60 Chloride 1 mg!L u 1 mg!L OK
TW4-60 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg!L u 0.1 mg!L OK
TWN-60 Chloride 1 mg!L u 1 mg!L OK
TWN-60 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L u 0.1 mg/L OK
TWN-65 Chloride 5 mg!L 1 mg/L OK
TWN-65 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg!L 0.1 mg!L OK
U = Value was reported by the laboratory as nondetect.
H-5 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
Cpnslitu~nt tWl~MJA .:&W.N-65. t?dPD
Chloride 28.4 26.4 7.30
Nitrogen 1.41 1.33 5.84
H-6 QC Control Limits for Analysis and Blanks
Method Blank Detections
All Method Blanks for the quarter were non-detect.
Matrix Soike % Recovery C -------------. --·-------------~ ---
REC
Lab Report Lab Sample ID Well Analyte MS %REC MSD%REC Range RPD
1401249 1401249-006BMS TWN-03 Nitrate 103 122 90-110 11.8
1401249 1401249-007BMS TWN-02 Nitrate 106 118 90-110 7.97
Laboratory Control Sample
All Laboratory Control Samples were within acceptance limits for the quarter.
H7R . T E I -eceiPt em perature va uat10n
Sample Batcb WeDs in Batch 'temperature·
1401249 Piezometer 1, Piezometer 2, Piezometer 3, TWN-1, TWN-2, 2.5 oc TWN-3, TWN-4, TWN-7, TWN-18, TWN-60, TWN-65
1401525 TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25 2.7 oc
1402140 TW4-60 2.9 oc
H -8 Rinsate Evaluation
All Rinsate and DI Blank samples were non-detect for the quarter.
Tab I
Kriged Current Quarter Isoconcentration Maps
NS = not sampled; ND = not detected
....._10
MW-4
.4.7
TW4-1
0 7.7
TWN-1
Q 1.5
PIEZ-1
., 6.8
TW4-32 ~5.1
kriged nitrate isocon and label
perched monitoring well showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched monitoring well
showing concentration in mg/L
temporary perched nitrate monitoring
well showing concentration in mg/L
perched piezometer showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched monitoring well
installed September, 2013 showing
concentration in mg/L
NOTE: MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19, and TW4-20 are chloroform pumping wells; TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 are nitrate pumping wells
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
KRIGED 1st QUARTER, 2014 NITRATE (mg/L)
(NITRATE + NITRITE AS N)
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE REFERENCE FIGURE
H:/718000/may14/nitrate/Unt0314.srf I I-1
NS = not sampled; NO = not detected
........_ 1 00 kriged chloride isocon and label
MW-4
.39
TW4-1
0 39
TWN-1
9 29
PIEZ-1
(ill 56
TW4-32
~55
perched monitoring well showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched monitoring well
showing concentration in mg/L
temporary perched nitrate monitoring
well showing concentration in mg/L
perched piezometer showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched monitoring well
installed September, 2013 showing
concentration in mg/L
NOTE: MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19, and TW4-20 are chloroform pumping wells; TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 are nitrate pumping wells
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
KRIGED 1st QUARTER, 2014 CHLORIDE (mg/L)
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE REFERENCE FIGURE
H:/718000/may14/chloride/Ucl0314.srf I I-2
TabJ
Analyte Concentrations Over Time
Piezometer 1
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/19/2009 6.8 NA
7/14/2009 6.8 60
9/22/2009 7.3 78
10/27/2009 7.4 61
6/2/2010 7.2 52
7/19/2010 6.8 52
12/10/2010 6.5 60
1/31/2011 7 60
4/25/2011 6.8 58
7/25/2011 7 53
10/19/2011 6.6 55
1/11/2012 7.1 78
4/20/2012 6.6 58
7/27/2012 7.2 56
10/17/2012 7.66 55
2/18/2013 8.11 56.7
4/24/2013 8.88 53.3
8/28/2013 7.83 55.1
10/16/2013 6.68 54.1
1/13/2014 6.79 56.2
Piezometer 2
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/19/2009 0.5 NA
7/14/2009 0.5 7
9/22/2009 0.5 17
10/27/2009 0.6 7
6/2/2010 0.6 8
7/19/2010 0.6 8
12/10/2010 0.2 6
1/31/2011 0.3 9
4/25/2011 0.3 8
7/25/2011 0.1 9
10/19/2011 0.1 8
1/11/2012 0.1 9
4/20/2012 0.2 8
7/27/2012 0.2 9
10/17/2012 0.192 9.5
2/19/2013 0.218 9.67
4/24/2013 0.172 10.3
8/28/2013 0.198 9.66
10/16/2013 0.364 9.22
1/13/2014 0.169 11.4
Piezometer 3
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/19/2009 0.7 NA
7/14/2009 0.8 12
9/22/2009 0.8 24
10/27/2009 1.2 19
3/24/2010 1.7 116
6/2/2010 1.6 36
7/19/2010 1.6 35
12/10/2010 1.8 25
1/31/2011 1.8 40
4/25/2011 1.7 35
7/25/2011 1.8 61
10/19/2011 1.7 12
1/11/2012 1.8 20
4/20/2012 1.7 53
7/27/2012 1.8 21
10/17/2012 2.75 20.1
2/19/2013 1.85 21
4/24/2013 1.83 21.2
8/28/2013 1.81 22.4
10/16/2013 1.80 23.5
1/13/2014 1.70 26.0
TWN-1
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/6/2009 0.7 19
7/21/2009 0.4 17
9/21/2009 0.4 19
10/28/2009 0.5 18
3/17/2010 0.5 17
5/26/2010 0.6 20
9/27/2010 0.6 19
12/7/2010 0.6 14
1/26/2011 0.5 17
4/20/2011 0.5 19
7/26/2011 0.5 14
10/17/2011 0.5 10
1/9/2012 0.6 15
4/18/2012 0.6 17
7/24/2012 0.6 17
10/15/2012 0.432 17.5
2/18/2013 0.681 17.6
4/23/2013 0.84 17.4
8/27/2013 1.24 24.1
10/16/2013 1.61 26.8
1/14/2014 1.47 29.2
TWN-2
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/6/2009 25.4 29
7/21/2009 25 25
9/21/2009 22.6 17
11/2/2009 20.8 55
3/24/2010 62.1 85
6/2/2010 69 97
9/29/2010 69 104
12/9/2010 48 93
2/1/2011 43 93
4/28/2011 40 85
7/28/2011 33 74
10/20/2011 33 76
1/12/2012 31 86
4/20/2012 48 103
7/31/2012 54 93
10/17/2012 22.1 79
2/19/2013 57.3 80.5
4/24/2013 57.7 82.1
8/27/2013 80 75.9
10/16/2013 111 70.4
1/13/2014 42.6 72.4
TWN-3
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/6/2009 23.6 96
7/21/2009 25.3 96
9/21/2009 27.1 99
11/2/2009 29 106
3/25/2010 25.3 111
6/3/2010 26 118
7/15/2010 27 106
12/10/2010 24 117
2/1/2011 24 138
4/28/2011 26 128
7/29/2011 25 134
10/20/2011 25 129
1/12/2012 25 143
4/20/2012 24 152
7/31/2012 27 158
10/17/2012 12.1 149
2/19/2013 22.2 157
4/24/2013 27.2 158
8/28/2013 20.9 171
10/17/2013 23.5 163
1/15/2014 19.6 160
TWN-4
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/6/2009 1 13
7/21/2009 0.05 12
9/21/2009 0.4 13
10/28/2009 0.4 11
3/16/2010 0.9 22
5/27/2010 1.0 22
9/27/2010 0.9 19
12/8/2010 1 21
1/25/2011 0.9 21
4/20/2011 0.9 21
7/26/2011 1.1 35
10/18/2011 0.9 20
1/9/2012 0.9 20
4/18/2012 1.1 24
7/25/2012 1.4 25
10/15/2012 1.45 26.4
2/18/2013 1.51 25.3
4/23/2013 1.63 24.4
8/27/2013 1.58 27.2
10/16/2013 1.69 29.4
1/14/2014 1.41 28.4
TWN-7
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
8/25/2009 ND 11
9/21/2009 ND 7
11/10/2009 0.1 7
3/17/2010 0.8 6
5/28/2010 1.2 6
7/14/2010 1.6 7
12/10/2010 1 4
1/27/2011 1.3 6
4/21/2011 1.7 6
7/29/2011 0.7 5
10/19/2011 2.2 6
1/11/2012 2.3 5
4/20/2012 1.2 6
7/26/2012 0.9 6
10/16/2012 0.641 5.67
2/19/2013 0.591 5.68
4/24/2013 1.16 5.88
8/28/2013 0.835 6.96
10/16/2013 0.986 5.70
1/15/2014 0.882 5.75
TWN-18
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
11/2/2009 1.3 57
3/17/2010 1.6 42
6/1/2010 1.8 63
9/27/2010 1.8 64
12/9/2010 1.6 59
1/27/2011 1.4 61
4/26/2011 1.8 67
7/28/2011 1.8 65
10/18/2011 1.9 60
1/10/2012 1.9 64
4/19/2012 2.1 64
7/26/2012 2.3 67
10/16/2012 1.95 67.5
2/18/2013 2.27 68.7
4/23/2013 2.32 64.3
8/27/2013 2.04 70.4
10/16/2013 2.15 67.3
1/14/2014 2.33 68.4
TW4-19
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
7/22/2002 42.80 12/7/2005 81
9/12/2002 47.60 3/9/2006 86
3/28/2003 61.40 7/20/2006 123
6/23/2003 11.40 11/9/2006 134
7/15/2003 6.80 2/28/2007 133
8/15/2003 4.00 8/15/2007 129
9/12/2003 5.70 10/10/2007 132
9/25/2003 9.20 3/26/2008 131
10/29/2003 7.70 6/25/2008 128
11/9/2003 4.80 9/10/2008 113
8/16/2004 9.91 10/15/2008 124
9/17/2004 4.50 3/4/2009 127
3/16/2005 5.30 6/23/2009 132
6/7/2005 5.70 9/14/2009 43
8/31/2005 4.60 12/14/2009 124
12/1/2005 0.10 2/17/2010 144
3/9/2006 4.00 6/9/2010 132
6/14/2006 5.20 8/16/2010 142
7/20/2006 4.30 10/11/2010 146
11/9/2006 4.60 2/17/2011 135
2/28/2007 4.00 6/7/2011 148
8/15/2007 4.10 8/17/2011 148
10/10/2007 4.00 11/17/2011 148
3/26/2008 2.20 1/23/2012 138
6/25/2008 2.81 6/6/2012 149
9/10/2008 36.20 9/5/2012 149
10/15/2008 47.80 10/3/2012 150
3/4/2009 3.20 2/11/2013 164
6/23/2009 2.40 6/5/2013 148
9/14/2009 0.10 9/3/2013 179
12/14/2009 26.70 10/29/2013 206
2/17/2010 2.00 1/27/2014 134
6/9/2010 4.40
8/16/2010 5.90
10/11/2010 2.70
2/17/2011 17.00
6/7/2011 12.00
8/17/2011 3.00
11/17/2011 5.00
1/23/2012 0.60
6/6/2012 2.40
9/5/2012 2.50
10/3/2012 4.10
2/11/2013 7.99
6/5/2013 2.95
9/3/2013 17.60
10/29/2013 4.70
1/27/2014 1.62
The sampling program for TW4-19 was updated in the fourth quarter of 2005
to include analysis for chloride as well as nitrate. This change accounts for the
different number of data points represented above.
TW4-21
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
5/25/2005 14.6 12/7/2005 353
8/31/2005 10.1 3/9/2006 347
11/30/2005 9.6 7/20/2006 357
3/9/2006 8.5 11/8/2006 296
6/14/2006 10.2 2/28/2007 306
7/20/2006 8.9 6/27/2007 327
11/8/2006 8.7 8/15/2007 300
2/28/2007 8.7 10/10/2007 288
6/27/2007 8.6 3/26/2008 331
8/15/2007 8.6 6/25/2008 271
10/10/2007 8.3 9/10/2008 244
3/26/2008 14.3 10/15/2008 284
6/25/2008 8.8 3/11/2009 279
9/10/2008 7.6 6/24/2009 291
10/15/2008 8.0 9/15/2009 281
3/11/2009 8.3 12/22/2009 256
6/24/2009 8.1 2/25/2010 228
9/15/2009 9.2 6/10/2010 266
12/22/2009 8.4 8/12/2010 278
2/25/2010 8.4 10/13/2010 210
6/10/2010 12.0 2/22/2011 303
8/12/2010 14.0 6/1/2011 297
10/13/2010 7.0 8/17/2011 287
2/22/2011 9.0 11/16/2011 276
6/1/2011 13.0 1/19/2012 228
8/17/2011 14.0 6/13/2012 285
11/16/2011 13.0 9/13/2012 142
1/19/2012 15.0 10/4/2012 270
6/13/2012 11.0 2/13/2013 221
9/13/2012 13.0 6/18/2013 243
10/4/2012 14.0 9/12/2013 207
2/13/2013 11.8 11/13/2013 206
6/18/2013 13.8 2/5/2014 200
9/12/2013 10.3
11/13/2013 9.0
2/5/2014 11.4
The sampling program for TW4-21 was updated in the fourth quarter of 2005
to include analysis for chloride as well as nitrate. This change accounts for the
different number of data points represented above.
TW4-22
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/28/2007 20.9 347
6/27/2007 19.3 273
8/15/2007 19.3 259
10/10/2007 18.8 238
3/26/2008 39.1 519
6/25/2008 41.9 271
9/10/2008 38.7 524
10/15/2008 36.3 539
3/11/2009 20.7 177
6/24/2009 20.6 177
9/15/2009 40.3 391
12/29/2009 17.8 175
3/3/2010 36.6 427
6/15/2010 19 134
8/12/2010 18 127
8/24/2010 15 130
10/13/2010 16 134
2/23/2011 18 114
6/1/2011 17 138
8/17/2011 15 120
11/16/2011 19 174
1/19/2012 14 36
6/13/2012 12.8 35
9/12/2012 7 121
10/4/2012 14 130
2/11/2013 58 635
6/5/2013 50.2 586
9/3/2013 29.7 487
10/29/2013 45.2 501
1/27/2014 54.6 598
TW4-24
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
6/27/2007 26.1 770
8/15/2007 29 791
10/10/2007 24.7 692
3/26/2008 24.4 740
6/25/2008 45.3 834
9/10/2008 38.4 1180
10/15/2008 44.6 1130
3/4/2009 30.5 1010
6/24/2009 30.4 759
9/15/2009 30.7 618
12/17/2009 28.3 1080
2/25/2010 33.1 896
6/9/2010 30 639
8/11/2010 32 556
8/24/2010 31 587
10/6/2010 31 522
2/17/2011 31 1100
5/26/2011 35 1110
8/17/2011 34 967
11/16/2011 35 608
1/18/2012 37 373
6/6/2012 37 355
8/30/2012 37 489
10/3/2012 38 405
2/11/2013 35.9 1260
6/5/2013 23.7 916
9/3/2013 32.6 998
10/29/2013 34.6 1030
1/27/2014 31.6 809
TW4-25
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
6/27/2007 17.1 395
8/15/2007 16.7 382
10/10/2007 17 356
3/26/2008 18.7 374
6/25/2008 22.1 344
9/10/2008 18.8 333
10/15/2008 21.3 366
3/4/2009 15.3 332
6/24/2009 15.3 328
9/15/2009 3.3 328
12/16/2009 14.2 371
2/23/2010 14.4 296
6/8/2010 16 306
8/10/2010 14 250
10/5/2010 15 312
2/16/2011 15 315
5/25/2011 16 321
8/16/2011 16 276
11/15/2011 16 294
1/18/2012 16 304
5/31/2012 16 287
9/11/2012 17 334
10/3/2012 17 338
2/11/2013 9.04 190
6/5/2013 5.24 136
9/3/2013 5.69 119
10/29/2013 6.10 88.6
1/27/2014 2.16 85.7
MW-30
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
6/22/2005 12.4 6/22/2005 125
9/22/2005 12.8 9/22/2005 125
12/14/2005 13.6 12/14/2005 128
3/22/2006 13.8 3/22/2006 125
6/21/2006 14.5 6/21/2006 124
9/13/2006 14.1 9/13/2006 118
10/25/2006 14.6 10/25/2006 124
3/15/2007 14.4 3/15/2007 125
8/22/2007 14.6 8/22/2007 126
10/24/2007 14.9 10/24/2007 122
3/19/2008 14.8 3/19/2008 118
6/3/2008 18.7 6/3/2008 125
8/4/2008 17.3 8/4/2008 121
11/5/2008 15.6 11/5/2008 162
2/3/2009 15.3 2/3/2009 113
5/13/2009 15.1 5/13/2009 122
8/24/2009 20.9 8/24/2009 118
10/14/2009 15.0 10/14/2009 129
1/20/2010 15.4 1/20/2010 106
2/9/2010 16.1 2/9/2010 127
4/27/2010 15.8 4/27/2010 97
5/24/2010 17.0 9/14/2010 111
6/15/2010 15.3 11/9/2010 126
8/24/2010 16.0 2/1/2011 134
9/14/2010 15.0 4/11/2011 134
10/19/2010 15.0 5/10/2011 128
11/9/2010 15.0 6/20/2011 127
12/14/2010 16.0 7/5/2011 127
1/10/2011 15.0 8/3/2011 126
2/1/2011 16.0 9/7/2011 145
3/14/2011 17.0 10/4/2011 129
4/11/2011 16.0 11/8/2011 122
5/10/2011 16.0 12/12/2011 124
6/20/2011 17.0 1/24/2012 124
7/5/2011 17.0 2/14/2012 126
8/3/2011 14.0 3/14/2012 128
9/7/2011 16.0 4/10/2012 128
10/4/2011 16.0 5/2/2012 124
11/8/2011 16.0 6/18/2012 131
12/12/2011 16.0 7/10/2012 128
1/24/2012 17.0 8/7/2012 139
2/14/2012 17.0 9/19/2012 130
3/14/2012 18.0 10/23/2012 135
4/10/2012 17.0 11/13/2012 114
5/2/2012 16.0 12/26/2012 122
MW-30
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
6/18/2012 15.0 1/23/2013 128
7/10/2012 17.0 2/26/2013 129
8/7/2012 18.0 3/20/2013 126
9/19/2012 16.0 4/17/2013 117
10/23/2012 16.2 5/15/2013 119
11/13/2012 18.5 6/25/2013 127
12/26/2012 17.2 7/10/2013 130
1/23/2013 19.2 8/20/2013 126
2/26/2013 21.4 9/18/2013 131
3/20/2013 14.3 10/22/2013 128
4/17/2013 16.8 11/20/2013 124
5/15/2013 18.8 12/18/2013 134
6/25/2013 16.1 1/8/2014 131
7/10/2013 17.6 2/25/2014 135
8/20/2013 16.4 3/11/2014 144
9/18/2013 16.9
10/22/2013 19.7
11/20/2013 19.5
12/18/2013 20.7
1/8/2014 24.0
2/25/2014 18.4
3/11/2014 21.3
Under the groundwater sampling progran, accelerated monitoring for nitrate began in MW-
30 prior to when the accelerated monitoring for chloride began. This difference accounts for
the different number of data points represented above.
MW-31
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
6/22/2005 24.2 6/22/2005 139
9/22/2005 22.4 9/22/2005 136
12/14/2005 23.8 12/14/2005 135
3/22/2006 24.1 3/22/2006 133
6/21/2006 25.3 6/21/2006 138
9/13/2006 24.6 9/13/2006 131
10/25/2006 25.1 10/25/2006 127
3/15/2007 23.2 3/15/2007 132
3/15/2007 22.0 3/15/2007 132
8/27/2007 23.3 8/27/2007 136
10/24/2007 24.6 10/24/2007 122
3/19/2008 25.0 3/19/2008 124
6/3/2008 29.3 6/3/2008 128
8/4/2008 28.7 8/4/2008 124
11/11/2008 29.9 11/11/2008 119
2/3/2009 23.4 2/3/2009 115
5/13/2009 22.4 5/13/2009 124
8/24/2009 15.4 8/24/2009 122
10/14/2009 22.6 10/14/2009 138
2/9/2010 21.7 2/9/2010 128
4/20/2010 22.5 4/20/2010 128
5/21/2010 23.0 9/13/2010 139
6/15/2010 21.1 11/9/2010 138
8/24/2010 22.0 2/1/2011 145
9/13/2010 21.0 4/1/2011 143
10/19/2010 20.0 5/10/2011 143
11/9/2010 20.0 6/20/2011 145
12/14/2010 20.0 7/5/2011 148
1/10/2011 19.0 8/2/2011 148
2/1/2011 21.0 9/6/2011 148
3/14/2011 22.0 10/3/2011 145
4/1/2011 21.0 11/8/2011 145
5/10/2011 20.0 12/12/2011 148
6/20/2011 22.0 1/24/2012 155
7/5/2011 22.0 2/13/2012 150
8/2/2011 20.0 3/13/2012 152
9/6/2011 21.0 4/9/2012 160
10/3/2011 21.0 5/2/2012 151
11/8/2011 21.0 6/18/2012 138
12/12/2011 21.0 7/9/2012 161
1/24/2012 21.0 8/6/2012 175
2/13/2012 21.0 9/18/2012 172
3/13/2012 22.0 10/22/2012 157
4/9/2012 21.0 11/6/2012 189
5/2/2012 20.0 12/18/2012 170
MW-31
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
6/18/2012 21.6 1/22/2013 176
7/9/2012 21.0 2/19/2013 174
8/6/2012 21.0 3/19/2013 168
9/18/2012 21.0 4/16/2013 171
10/22/2012 18.0 5/13/2013 169
11/6/2012 23.6 6/24/2013 179
12/18/2012 22.2 7/9/2013 182
1/22/2013 22.8 8/19/2013 183
2/19/2013 19.3 9/17/2013 193
3/19/2013 19.1 10/23/2013 188
4/16/2013 18.8 11/18/2013 174
5/13/2013 23.8 12/17/2013 203
6/24/2013 20.0 1/7/2014 194
7/9/2013 21.7 2/17/2014 197
8/19/2013 16.0 3/10/2014 230
9/17/2013 21.2
10/23/2013 21.2
11/18/2013 23.9
12/17/2013 24.2
1/7/2014 24.0
2/17/2014 20.6
3/10/2014 26.2
Under the groundwater sampling progran, accelerated monitoring for nitrate
began in MW-31 prior to when the accelerated monitoring for chloride began.
This difference accounts for the different number of data points represented
above.
TabK
Concentration Trend Graphs
II> c: 0 ::::: ftl ... -c: Q)
CJ c: 0 0
Q) -ftl ... . t: z ,... ... ~ E 0
111 c::
K
r
1\
4
~
~
(
~,
0 ...-
v~-unr
~
.-4
8 ~ -ABV\1
~ .
~ ~~-des
r
o ~ -onv
o~-uer
' 6o-1nr
~
so-::>aa
so-unr
C\J ,.... 0
(1J6W)
rn r::: 0 ~ ... -r::: (L)
(.) r:::
0 (.)
(L)
"C 'i: 0
.c:
(.) ,.... ...
(L) -;
E 0 N .!!! a.
0 0) 0 co
<
~
~
~
~
1
~
y J
~
~~
'\
~
~~
0 <D 0 0
1.{) "¢
(1J6W)
0 C') 0 C\J
-
-
0 0 ..-
v ~-unr
8 ~-/\ON
8 ~-keV\1
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.::J
o~-5nv
o ~-uer
6o-1nr
so<>aa
tn t: 0 ; as .... -t:
C1)
()
t:
0 (.)
C1) -as .... .t:: z
C\1 ....
C1) -C1)
E
0 N .!!:! c..
r-------.-------.-------~------,-------.--------.-------.P~-unr
-8 ~-/\ON
l~-JdV
~ ~-das
~ ~ -qa.:J
o~-Bnv
0~-u-er
so-oaa
~------~----~------~-------+-------+------~-------+80-unr
CD 0 10
0
(1/fiW)
C\J 0
T""" 0 0
1/) c 0 ~ -c (1,)
(,) c 0 (.)
(1,) ,
·~
..S!
J: (.)
C\1
~ ! E ~ i:i:
co C\J ..-
' ~
~ ~
~
~
~
~
v·
~
~
.....
0 co
(1J6W)
v~-unr
8~-AON
8 ~ -lieV\1
-
-
-~~-des
~ ~-qa.:J
o ~-5nv
o ~-uer
-6o-1nr
C\J 0
rn c 0 :+::0
C'CI '--c
Cl)
(,) c 0 (.)
Cl) -C'CI '-.:t:: z
('I)
'-Cl) -Cl)
E 0 N Cl)
0:
C\1
(1/BW)
L{)
c:i
8 ~-AON
8 ~ -ABV\1
G ~-Jd\f
~~-des
~ ~-qa.:J
o~-6nv
o~-uer
0
1/) c 0 +=i
C'I:S a.. -c
G)
CJ c 0 0
G)
"'0 •t:
.2 .r:::
0
(")
a..
G) -G)
E 0 N G)
ii:
.-----~-------.-------.-------.-------.-------.------~v~-unr
8~-AON
8 ~-kBV\1
c~-PO
c ~ -Jd'v'
~ ~-das
-~ ~ -qa.::l
o ~ -Bnv
o ~-uer
r-----~~----_,------~-------+-------+-------r------~80-~aa
0 "¢ ,...-
0
C\J ,...-
0 0 ,...-
0 co
(1J6W)
0 co 0 C\J 0
II) c 0 i ... -c
Cl)
(.) c
0 (..)
.! "' ...
:!:::: z
T"" I z ~
~ v ------.. ~ " "' t>
..... co 0
(1J6W)
~ ~
~
~
~
~~
/
/'
CD
0
C\J 0
-
0
vL-unr
8 L-AON
8 L -ABV\1
L L-das
o L-flnv
OL-uer
5o-1nr
so-oao
so-unr
tn c:
0 ·.;:::; as .... -c: C1) u c: 0
(.)
C1)
"C
'i:
0
J:
(.)
T"' I z ~ 1-
~------~----~------~------~------~------~------~v~-unr
-£~-/\ON
· £ ~ -liBV\1
G ~ -Jd'v'
~~-des
~ ~-qa.:J
o ~ -onv
-o~-uer
6o-1nr
~------~----~~-----4-------+-------+------~------4 80-unr
l.()
C') 0 C')
l.()
(\J 0 (\J
l.() 0 l.() 0 ,..-
rn c 0 .. cu ... ... c
G)
(,) c 0 0
G) ... cu ... . ~ z
N I z ~
r-------~---------r--------~--------r-------~---------r v~-unr
G ~ -Jd\f
~ ~-das
-~ ~-qa::J
-o ~-5nv
0~-uer
6o-1nr
so-oaa
~-------+--------+--------+--------,_------~---------+90-unr
0 C\1 0 0 0 (() 0 (!)
(1t6w)
0 C\1 0
tn r::
0 ·~ as ... -r::
C1)
() r:: 0 0
C1)
'tJ 'i:
..2 .r::
()
N I z 3: 1-
.--------.--------.-------~--------.-------~---------.v~-unr
8 ~-/\ON
c: ~ -Jd'v'
~~-des
-~ ~-qa.:J
o ~ -5nv
o ~-uer
60-1nr
-so-oaa
~-------r--------+--------+--------,_------~--------~so-unr
0 (\J 0 0
T"""
0 00 0 tO
(1J6W)
0 (\J 0
en c 0 ·.;:::; cu "--c
G)
(,) c 0 0
G) -cu "-.~ z
('I)
I z s: 1-
.-------~------~------~------,-------~------~-------.t~-unr
8~-AON
G ~ -Jd'v'
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.:J
o ~ -onv
o~-uer
eo-1nr
-so-oaa
~------+-------+-------+-------~------~------~-------+80-unr
1.0 C') 0 C') 1.0 C\1 0 C\1
(1t6W)
1.0 0 1.0 0 ,.... ,....
en c 0 ':.j:O cu "--c
G)
(.) c 0 (.)
G) ,
'i:
0
.s::. (.)
C")
I z 3: .....
0 co
T"""
0 <0
T"""
0 "<t 0 C\1
T"""
0 0
T"""
0 co
(1/6W)
0 <0 0 C\1
0
8 ~-AON
G ~-Jdy
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa::J
o~-6ny
o~-uer
eo-1nr
tn c
0 -.:; ns I.. -c C1)
(,) c
0 0 s ns I.. .'!:::: z
lll:t I z ~
~----~----~----~----~----~------r-----~----~-----.v~-unr
-8 ~-/\ON
c ~ -Jd\f
-~~-des
-~ ~-qa.:J
-o ~ -Bnv
0~-uer
60·1nr
eo-oaa
~----+-----+-----+-----+-----4-----~----~----~-----+Bo-unr
CX>
0
(1J6W)
<D
0
C\1 0 0
In c: 0 += ca 1lo.. -c: C1)
CJ c: 0 0
Cl)
"C 'i:
.2 J: 0
1111:1' I z ~
~-----r------~----~------,-----~-------r------~-----r v~-unr
8 ~-/\ON
c ~ -Jd'v'
~~-des
~ ~-qa::J
-o ~ -onv
o ~-uer
r-----~----_,------~-----+------+------+------r------+90-unr
1.()
C')
1.()
C\J 0 C\J
(1J6W)
1.() .,.... 0 1.0 0 .,....
~--------~----------~----------~---------.-----------r v~-unr
£~-AON
C:: ~-lOQ
U) c 0 .. ca -c::~-Jd\f a.. ... c Cl)
C.> c 0 0
Cl) ~ ~-das ... ca a.. .t::: z ..... I z ~ ~ ~ -qa::J
-o~-onv
-o~-uer
1------+-----+-----+------+-----+ 6o-1nr
C\J lO 0 0
(1J6W)
~-------r--------~------~--------~------~---------r v~-unr
8~-AON
tn c: " c ~ -Jd'v' 0 ;: as ._ .... c: C1)
(.) c: ~ ~-das 0 0
C1)
'a "i:
..2
J: 0 • ~ ~-qa.:J
....... I z 3: 1-
-o ~ -Bnv
o ~-uer
~-------+--------+--------+--------~-------;---------+80-oaa
0 <D 0
(1J6W)
r----------.----------.----------.----------.---------~v~-unr
-8 ~-keii'J
c~-PO
UJ c
0 ... ca G ~ -JdV' ... -c
Q)
(,) c
0 0
Q) -~ ~-das ca ...
.:!:::: z
QO
'I"'" I z
3: 1-~ ~ -qa=J
o~-5nv
-o~-uer
1----------+------+----~1------+-------+ so-1nr
I() 0 ci
(1/6W)
(/) c:
0 -.::: ca ... -c:
C1)
(,) c: 0 0
C1)
'a 'i:
..2
.t:.
0
co
'f'"" I z 3: 1-
~----~----~------~-----.------~-----.------r------.v~-unr
£~·AON
-~~-PO
~ ~-Jd\f
-~ ~-das
~ ~ -qa.::l
o~-5nv
o~-uer
t----+-----t-----lt----+----+----t---+----;-eo-1nr
0 co 0 (0 0 l() 0 Ct) 0 C\J 0 0
0
0 0
7/1/2002
11/1/2002
3/1/2003
7/1/2003
11/1/2003
3/1/2004
7/1/2004
11/1/2004
3/1/2005
7/1/2005
11/1/2005
3/1/2006
7/1/2006
11/1/2006
3/1/2007
7/1/2007
11/1/2007
3/1/2008
7/1/2008
11/1/2008
3/1/2009
7/1/2009
11/1/2009
3/1/2010
7/1/2010
11/1/2010 -
3/1/2011
7/1/2011
11/1/2011 -
3/1/2012
7/1/2012
11/1/2012 -
3/1/2013 -
7/1/2013
11/1/2013
...., N 0 0
0 0 0 0
w 0
0 0
.j::o 0
0 0
l/1 0
0 0
C"' 0
0 0
-...I 0 0 0
~ ~ I ......
\0
z -· ,...
Ql ,...
tn
n
0 :::s n tn :::s ,...
Ql ,... -· 0 :::s
"'
0
12/1/2005
3/1/2006
6/1/2006
9/1/2006
12/1/2006
3/1/2007
6/1/2007
9/1/2007
12/1/2007
3/1/2008
6/1/2008
9/1/2008
12/1/2008
3/1/2009
6/1/2009
9/1/2009
12/1/2009 -
3/1/2010 -
6/1/2010
9/1/2010
12/1/2010
3/1/2011 .
6/1/2011 -
9/1/2011 .
12/1/2011
3/1/2012
6/1/2012
9/1/2012
12/1/2012 -
3/1/2013
6/1/2013
9/1/2013
12/1/2013
l.r1 0
.... 0 0
.... l.r1 0
N 0 0
N l.r1 0
-t :E ~ I ..... ~
n :::r -0
""' -· c.
tD
n
0
:::::J n tD
:::::J r+
""' OJ r+ -· 0
:::::J
"'
0 N +:> C'l 00
0 0 0 0 0
5/1/2005
8/1/2005
11/1/2005
2/1/2006
5/1/2006
8/1/2006
11/1/2006
2/1/2007
5/1/2007
8/1/2007
11/1/2007
2/1/2008
5/1/2008
8/1/2008
11/1/2008
2/1/2009 .
5/1/2009 -
8/1/2009
11/1/2009
2/1/2010
5/1/2010
8/1/2010
11/1/2010
2/1/2011
5/1/2011
8/1/2011
11/1/2011
2/1/2012
5/1/2012
8/1/2012
11/1/2012
2/1/2013
5/1/2013
8/1/2013
11/1/2013
2/1/2014
...... 0
0
......
N
0
...... +:>
0
......
C'l 0
......
:E ~ I N
~
2 -· .... ..,
QJ .... tD
n 0 ::s n tD ::s .... ..,
QJ .... -· 0 ::s
"'
0
12/1/2005
3/1/2006
6/1/2006
9/1/2006
12/1/2006
3/1/2007
6/1/2007
9/1/2007
12/1/2007
3/1/2008
6/1/2008
9/1/2008
12/1/2008 -
3/1/2009
6/1/2009
9/1/2009
12/1/2009
3/1/2010
6/1/2010
9/1/2010
12/1/2010
3/1/2011
6/1/2011
9/1/2011
12/1/2011
3/1/2012
6/1/2012
9/1/2012
12/1/2012
3/1/2013
6/1/2013
9/1/2013
12/1/2013
.....,
VI 0 0 0
.....,
VI 0
i'J 0 0
i'J VI 0
w 0 0
w VI 0
.j:>.
0 0
-4 :E ~ I N ...,a.
n :::r -0 .., -· c.
tD
n
0
::::J n tD
::::J r+
Ql
r+ -· 0
::::J
"'
"' c:
0 ·-+"' nJ '-+"' c:
(U u c:
0 u
(U
+"' ~ +"' ·-z
N N I
11:::1' 3: 1-
U) c 0 ·-.... ~ .... c cu u c
0 u
cu
"'C ·-...
0 -.c u
N
N I ll::t s 1-
0 0 r:--
0 0 1.0
0 0 11"1
0 0 <:t
1/8W
0 0 cVl
0 0 C"J
0 0 .-I
0
V) c:
0 ·-+"' ~
+"' c: cu u c:
0 u
cu +"' (U
lo.. +"' ·-
0 Ll'l
Ll'l
("(')
0
("(')
Ll'l N
1/SW
0 N Ll'l ...-1
Cl) c
0 ·-+"' ~ +"' c
QJ u c
0 u
QJ -c ·-~
0 -
0 0
""" ..-i
0 0 N
..-i
0 0 0 ..-i
0 0 00
l/8W
0 0 1.0
0 0
"""
0 0 N
0
U) c
0 ·-...,
~ ...,
c
QJ u c
0 u
QJ ...,
"' ~ ..., ·-z
Ln
N
I q-
~ 1-
Ll'l N 0
N
Ll'l
.-I
1/SW
0
.-I Ll'l 0
V) c:
0 ·-...... m :1.... ...... c: cv u c:
0 u
cv
"'C ·-:1....
0
.J: u
Ln
N I lll:t 3:
1-
0
U"i
"""
0 0
"""
0
U"i ('(')
0 0 ('(')
0 U"i N
0 0 N
0
U"i .-t
0 0 .-t
0
U"i
0
0 \.n b b
6/1/2005
9/1/2005
12/1/2005
3/1/2006
6/1/2006 -
9/1/2006
12/1/2006
3/1/2007
6/1/2007
9/1/2007
12/1/2007
3/1/2008
6/1/2008
9/1/2008
12/1/2008
3/1/2009
6/1/2009
9/1/2009
12/1/2009
3/1/2010
6/1/2010
9/1/2010
12/1/2010
3/1/2011-
6/1/2011
9/1/2011 .,
12/1/2011
3/1/2012
6/1/2012
9/1/2012
12/1/2012
3/1/2013
6/1/2013
9/1/2013
12/1/2013 .
3/1/2014
I-' 0 b
I-' \.n b
N 0 b
N \.n b
w 0 b
s ~ I w 0 z -· r+
Ql
r+ tD
n 0
:::::s n tD
:::::s r+
""' OJ r+ -· 0
:::::s
"'
0
6/1/2005
9/1/2005
12/1/2005
3/1/2006
6/1/2006
9/1/2006
12/1/2006
3/1/2007
6/1/2007
9/1/2007 -
12/1/2007
3/1/2008 -
6/1/2008
9/1/2008
12/1/2008
3/1/2009
6/1/2009
9/1/2009
12/1/2009
3/1/2010
6/1/2010
9/1/2010
12/1/2010
3/1/2011
6/1/2011
9/1/2011
12/1/2011
3/1/2012
6/1/2012
9/1/2012
12/1/2012
3/1/2013
6/1/2013 -
9/1/2013
12/1/2013 -
3/1/2014
N 0 ~ 0 en 0 00 0
.....
0 0
.....
N 0
..... ~ 0
..... en 0
..... 00 0
s :e I w 0
n :::r -0 .., -· a.
(1)
n 0
::::s n
(1)
::::s ,... ..,
QJ ,... -· 0
::::s
"'
9 0
6/1/2005
9/1/2005
12/1/2005
3/1/2006
6/1/2006
9/1/2006
12/1/2006
3/1/2007
6/1/2007
9/1/2007 -
12/1/2007
3/1/2008
6/1/2008 ..
9/1/2008
12/1/2008
3/1/2009
6/1/2009
9/1/2009
12/1/2009
3/1/2010
6/1/2010
9/1/2010
12/1/2010 .
3/1/2011 .
6/1/2011
9/1/2011
12/1/2011
3/1/2012
6/1/2012
9/1/2012
12/1/2012
3/1/2013 •.
6/1/2013
9/1/2013
12/1/2013
3/1/2014
U'l
0
1-' 0 0
1-'
U'l
0
N 0 0
N
U'l
0
w 0 0
w U'l
0
s
== I w
~
z ;::;:
~ OJ
f"'t tD
n
0
::::J n tD
::::J f"'t
Sil
f"'t -· 0
::::J
"'
6/1/2005
9/1/2005
0
12/1/2005
3/1/2006
6/1/2006
9/1/2006 -
12/1/2006
3/1/2007
6/1/2007
9/1/2007
12/1/2007
3/1/2008
6/1/2008
9/1/2008
12/1/2008
3/1/2009
6/1/2009 -
9/1/2009
12/1/2009
3/1/2010
6/1/2010
9/1/2010
12/1/2010 -
3/1/2011 -
6/1/2011 -
9/1/2011 -
12/1/2011
3/1/2012
6/1/2012
9/1/2012
12/1/2012
3/1/2013
6/1/2013
9/1/2013
12/1/2013
3/1/2014
V1 0
...... 0 0
......
V1 0
N 0 0
N V1
0
s
:E
I w
~
n :r -0
""'' -· a. m
n 0
::::s n m
::::s r+
""'' Q)
r+ -· 0
::::s
"'
TabL
CSV Transmittal Letter
Kathy Weinel
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Dear Mr. Lundberg,
Kathy Weinel
Monday, May 19, 2014 7:45 AM
'Rusty Lundberg'
'Phillip Goble'; 'Dean Henderson'; Harold Roberts; Dan Hillsten; Frank Filas, P.E; David
Frydenlund; David Turk; Jaime Massey
Transmittal of CSV Files White Mesa Mill 2014 01 Nitrate Monitoring
1401249-EDD.csv
Attached to this e-mail is an electronic copy of laboratory results for nitrate monitoring conducted at the White Mesa
Mill during the first quarter of 2014, in Comma Separated Value (CSV) format.
Please contact me at 303-389-4134 if you have any questions on this transmittal.
Yours Truly
Kathy Weinel
1