DRC-2014-001902 - 0901a0688040a01e

ENERGYFUELS
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Blvd. Suite 600
Lakewood, CO, US, 80228
303 974 2140
www energvfuels.com
Mr. Rusty Lundberg
Division of Radiation Control
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
February 21, 2014 DRC"201 4-001 902
Sent VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
P.O. Box 144850
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Re: Transmittal of 4th Quarter 2013 Nitrate Monitoring Report
Stipulation and Consent Order Docket Number UGW12-04 White Mesa Uranium Mill
Dear Mr. Lundberg:
Enclosed are two copies of the White Mesa Uranium Mill Nitrate Monitoring Report for the 4th
Quarter of 2013 as required by the Stipulation and Consent Order Docket Number UGW12-04, as well
as two CDs each containing a word searchable electronic copy of the report.
If you should have any questions regarding this report please contact me.
Yours very truly,
ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC.
Kathy Weinel
Quality Assurance Manager
cc: David C. Frydenlund
Dan Hillsten
Harold R. Roberts
David E. Turk
Frank Filas
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Nitrate Monitoring Report
State of Utah
Stipulated Consent Agreement, January 2009
Docket No. UGW09-03
4th Quarter
(October through December)
2013
Prepared by:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Boulevard, Suite 600
Lakewood, CO 80228
February 21, 2014
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1
2.0 GROUNDWATER NITRATE MONITORING ................................................ !
2.1 Samples and Measurements Taken During the Quarter ..................................... 1
2.1.1 Nitrate Monitoring ..................................................................................... 2
2.1.2 Parameters Analyzed .................................................................................. 3
2.1.3 Groundwater Head and Level Monitoring ................................................. -. 3
2.2 Sampling Methodology and Equipment and Decontamination Procedures ....... 3
2.2.1 Well Purging, Sampling and Depth to Groundwater .................................. 4
2.2.2 Piezometer Sampling .................................................................................. 5
2.3 Field Data ............................................................................................................ 5
2.4 Depth to Groundwater Data and Water Table Contour Map .............................. 5
2.5 Laboratory Results .............................................................................................. 5
2.5.1 Copy of Laboratory Results ........................................................................ 5
2.5.2 Regulatory Framework ............................................................................... 5
3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND DATA VALIDATION ................................... 6
3.1 Field QC Samples ................................................................................................ 6
3.2 Adherence to Mill Sampling SOPs ..................................................................... 6
3.3 Analyte Completeness Review ................... ,. ....................................................... 7
3.4 Data Validation .................................................................................................... 7
3.4.1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation .................................................................... 7
3.4.2 Holding Time Evaluation ............................................................................ 8
3.4.3 Analytical Method Checklist ...................................................................... 8
3.4.4 Reporting Limit Evaluation ........................................................................ 8
3.4.5 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates ................................................. 9
3.4.6 Other Laboratory QA/QC ........................................................................... , 9
3.4.7 Receipt Temperature Evaluation ............................................................... 10
3.4.8 Rinsate Check ........................................................................................... 10
4.0 INTERPRETATION OF DATA ....................................................................... 10
4.1 Interpretation of Groundwater Levels, Gradients and Flow Directions ........... 10
4.1.1 Current Site Groundwater Contour Map ................................................... 10
4.1.2 Comparison of Current Groundwater Contour Map to Groundwater Contour Map
for Previous Quarter.................................................................................. 13
4.1.3 Hydrographs .............................................................................................. 15
4.1.4 Depth to Groundwater Measured and Groundwater Elevation ................. 15
4.2 Effectiveness of Hydraulic Containment and Capture ...................................... 15
4.2.1 Hydraulic Containment and Control ......................................................... 15
4.2.2 Current Nitrate and Chloride Isoconcentration Maps ............................... 18
4.2.3 Comparison of Areal Extent ............................................................................ 18
4.2.4 Nitrate and Chloride Concentration Trend Data and Graphs .................... 19
4.2.5 Interpretation of Analytical Data .............................................................. 19
4.3 Estimation of Pumped Nitrate Mass and Residual Nitrate Mass within the Plume
.......................................................................................................................... 21
5.0 LONG TERM PUMP TEST AT TWN-02, TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-25
OPERATIONS REPORT .................................................................................. 23
5.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 23
1
5.2 Pumping Well Data Collection ......................................................................... 23
5.3 Water Level Measurements .............................................................................. 23
5.4 Pumping Rates and Volumes ................................... , ......................................... 24
6.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT ................................................................. 24
6.1 Assessment of Previous Quarter's Corrective Actions ..................................... 24
7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................ 24
8.0 ELECTRONIC DATA FILES AND FORMAT .............................................. 29
9.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION ........................................................... 30
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Table 5
Table 6
Table 7
Table 8
LIST OF TABLES
Summary of Well Sampling and Constituents for the Period
Nitrate Mass Removal Per Well Per Quarter
Nitrate Well Pumping Rates and Volumes
Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate mass Removed and Total Volume of Water
Pumped
Nitrate Data Over Time for MW-30, MW-31, MW-5, and MW-11
Slug Test Results
Pre-Pumping Saturated Thickness
Pre-Pumping Hydraulic Gradients and Flow Calculations
ii
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
Tab B Order of Sampling and Field Data Worksheets
Tab C Kriged Current Quarter Groundwater Contour Map and Weekly, Monthly and Quarterly
Depth to Water Data
Tab D Kriged Previous Quarter Groundwater Contour Map
Tab E Hydrographs of Groundwater Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab F Depths to Groundwater and Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab G Laboratory Analytical Reports
Tab H Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
H-1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation
H-2 Holding Time Evaluation
H-3 Analytical Method Check
H-4 Reporting Limit Evaluation
H-5 QAJQC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
H-6 QC Control limits for Analysis and Blanks
H-7 Receipt Temperature Evaluation
H-8 Rinsate Evaluation
Tab I Kriged Current Quarter Nitrate and Chloride Isoconcentration Maps
Tab J Analyte Concentration Data Over Time
Tab K Nitrate and Chloride Concentration Trend Graphs
Tab L CSV Transmittal Letter
iii
AWAL
CA
CAP
CIR
DIFB
DRC
EFRI
ft amsl
GWDP
LCS
MS
MSD
QA
QAP
QC
RPD
sco
SOPs
UDEQ
voc
ACRONYM LIST
American West Analytical Laboratory
Consent Agreement
Corrective Action Plan
Contamination Investigation Report
Deionized Field Blanks
Utah Division of Radiation Control
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
feet above mean sea level
Groundwater Discharge Permit
Laboratory Control Spike
Matrix Spike
Matrix Spike Duplicate
Quality Assurance
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan
Quality Control
Relative Percent Difference
Stipulated Consent Order
Standard Operating Procedures
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
Volatile Organic Compounds
IV
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Utah Department of Environmental Quality ("UDEQ") Division of Radiation Control
("DRC") noted in a Request dated September 30, 2008 (the "Request"), for a Voluntary Plan and
Schedule to Investigate and Remediate Nitrate Contamination at the White Mesa Uranium Mill
(the "Mill") (the "Plan"), that nitrate levels have exceeded the State water quality standard of 10
mg/L in certain monitoring wells. As a result of the Request, Energy Fuels Resources (USA)
Inc. ("EFRI") entered into a Stipulated Consent Agreement with the Utah Water Quality Board
in January 2009 which directed the preparation of a Nitrate Contamination Investigation Report
("CIR"). A subsequent letter dated December 1, 2009, among other things, recommended that
EFRI also address elevated chloride concentrations in the CIR. The Stipulated Consent
Agreement was amended in August 2011. Under the amended Consent Agreement ("CA"),
EFRI submitted a Corrective Action Plan ("CAP"), pursuant to the requirements of the Utah
Groundwater Quality Protection Rules [UAC R317-6-6.15(C-E)] on November 29, 2011 and
revised versions of the CAP on February 27, 2012 and May 7, 2012. On December 12, 2012,
DRC signed the Stipulation and Consent Order ("SCO"), Docket Number UGW12-04, which
approved the EFRI CAP, dated May 7, 2012. The SCO ordered EFRI to fully implement all
elements of the May 7, 2012 CAP.
Based on the schedule included in the CAP and as delineated and approved by the SCO, all
activities associated with the implementation of the CAP began in January 2013. The reporting
requirements specified in the CAP and SCO are included in this quarterly nitrate report.
This is the Quarterly Nitrate Monitoring Report, as required under the SCO, State of UDEQ
Docket No. UGW12-04 for the fourth quarter of 2013. This report meets the requirements of the
SCO, State of UDEQ Docket No. UGW12-04 and is the document which covers nitrate
corrective action and monitoring activities during the fomth quarter of 2013.
2.0 GROUNDWATER NITRATE MONITORING
2.1 Samples and Measurements Taken During the Quarter
A map showing the location of all groundwater monitoring wells, piezometers, existing wells,
temporary chloroform contaminant investigation wells and temporary nitrate investigation wells
is attached under Tab A. Nitrate samples and measurements taken during this reporting period
are discussed in the remainder of this section.
1
2.1.1 Nitrate Monitoring
Quarterly sampling for nitrate monitoring parameters was performed in the following wells:
TWN-1
TWN-2
TWN-3
TWN-4
TWN-7
TWN-18
TW4-22*
TW4-24*
TW4-25*
Piezometer 1
Piezometer 2
Piezometer 3
As discussed in Section 2.1.2 the analytical constituents required by the CAP are inorganic
chloride and nitrate+nitrite as N (referred to as nitrate in this document)
* Wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25 are chloroform investigation wells (wells installed and
sampled primarily for the chloroform investigation) and are sampled as part of the chloroform
program. The analytical suite for these three wells includes nitrate, chloride and a select list of
Volatile Organic Compounds ("VOCs") as specified in the chloroform program. These three
wells are included here because they are being pumped as part of the remediation of the nitrate
contamination as required by the SCO and the CAP. The nitrate and chloride data are included
in this report as well as in the chloroform program quarterly report. The VOC data for these
three wells will be reported in the chloroform quarterly monitoring report only.
The December 12, 2012 SCO approved the CAP, which specified the cessation of sampling in
TWN-5, TWN-6, TWN-8, TWN-9, TWN-10, TWN-11, TWN-12, TWN-13, TWN-14, TWN-15,
TWN-16, TWN-17, and TWN-19. Per the CAP and SCO, these wells were not sampled during
this quarter. Additionally, the CAP and SCO approved the abandonment of TWN-5, TWN-8,
TWN-9, TWN-10, TWN-11, TWN-12, TWN-13, TWN-15, and TWN-17 within 1 year of the
SCO approval. These wells were abandoned in accordance with the DRC-approved Well
Abandonment Procedure on July 31, 2013. Wells TWN-6, TWN-14, TWN-16, and TWN-19
have been maintained for depth to groundwater monitoring only, as noted in the CAP.
Table 1 provides an overview of all locations sampled during the current period, along with the
date samples were collected from each location, and the date(s) upon which analytical data were
received from the contract laboratory. Table 1 also identifies rinsate samples collected, as well
as sample numbers associated with any required duplicates.
As indicated in Table 1, nitrate monitoring was performed in the nitrate monitoring wells,
chloroform wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25 and Piezometers 1, 2, and 3. Analytical data for
all of the above-listed wells, and the piezometers, are included in Tab G.
Nitrate and chloride are also monitored in all of the Mill's groundwater monitoring wells and
chloroform investigation wells. Data from those wells for this quarter are incorporated in certain
maps and figures in this report but are discussed in their respective programmatic reports.
2
2.1.2 Parameters Analyzed
Locations sampled during this reporting period were analyzed for the following constituents:
• Inorganic Chloride
• Nitrate plus Nitrite as Nitrogen (referred to herein as nitrate)
Use of analytical methods consistent with the requirements found in the White Mesa Mill
Groundwater Quality Assurance Plan, ("QAP") Revision 7.2, dated June 6, 2012 was confirmed
for all analytes, as discussed later in this report.
2.1.3 Groundwater Head and Level Monitoring
Depth to groundwater was measured in the following wells and/or piezometers, pursuant to Part
I.E.3 of the Groundwater Discharge Permit ("GWDP") (dated August 24, 2012):
• The quarterly groundwater compliance monitoring wells
• Existing well MW -4 and all of the temporary chloroform investigation wells
• Piezometers-P-1, P-2, P-3, P-4 and P-5
• MW-20, MW-22, and MW-34
• The DR piezometers that were installed during the Southwest Hydrogeologic
Investigation
• Nitrate wells TWN-01 , TWN-02, TWN-03, TWN-04, TWN-06, TWN-07, TWN-14,
TWN-16, TWN-18 and TWN-19
In addition to the above, depth to water measurements are routinely observed in conjunction with
sampling events for all wells sampled during quarterly and accelerated efforts, regardless of the
sampling purpose.
All well levels used for groundwater contour mapping were measured and recorded within 5
calendar days of each other as indicated by the measurement dates in the summary sheet under
Tab C. Field data sheets for groundwater measurements are also provided in Tab C.
Weekly and monthly depth to groundwater measurements were taken in the chloroform pumping
wells MW-4, MW-26, TW4-19, TW4-20, and TW4-4, and the nitrate pumping wells TW4-22,
TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2. In addition, monthly water level measurements were taken in
non-pumping wells MW-27, MW-30, MW-31, TW4-21, TWN-1, TWN-3, TWN-4, TWN-7, and
TWN-18 as required by the CAP.
2.2 Sampling Methodology and Equipment and Decontamination Procedures
The QAP provides a detailed presentation of procedures utilized for groundwater sampling
activities under the GWDP (August 24, 2012).
The sampling methodology, equipment and decontamination procedures that were performed for
the nitrate contaminant investigation, as summarized below, are consistent with the QAP.
3
2.2.1 Well Purging, Sampling and Depth to Groundwater
A list of the wells in order of increasing nitrate contamination is generated quarterly. The order
for purging is thus established. The list is included with the Field Data Worksheets under Tab B.
Mill personnel start purging with all of the nondetect wells and then move to the wells with
detectable nitrate concentrations, progressing from the wells having the lowest nitrate
contamination to wells with the highest nitrate contamination.
Before leaving the Mill office, the pump and hose are decontaminated using the cleaning agents
described in Attachment 2-2 of the QAP. Rinsate blanks are collected at a frequency of one
rinsate per 20 field samples.
Purging is completed to remove stagnant water from the casing and to assure that representative
samples of formation water are collected for analysis. There are three purging strategies
specified in the QAP that are used to remove stagnant water from the casing during groundwater
sampling at the Mill. The three strategies are as follows:
1. Purging three well casing volumes with a single measurement of field parameters
2. Purging two casing volumes with stable field parameters (within 10% Relative Percent
Difference ["RPD"])
3. Purging a well to dryness and stability (within 10% RPD) of a limited list of field parameters
after recovery.
Mill personnel proceed to the first well, which is the well with the lowest concentration (i.e. non-
dectect) of nitrate based on the previous quarter's sampling results. Well depth measurements
are taken and the one casing volume is calculated. The purging strategy that will be used for the
well is determined at this time based on the depth to water measurement and the previous
production of the well. The Grundfos pump (a 6 to 10 gallon per minute [gpm] pump) is then
lowered to the appropriate depth in the well and purging is started. At the first well, the purge
rate is measured for the purging event by using a calibrated 5 gallon bucket. After the
evacuation of the well has been completed, the well is sampled when possible, and the pump is
removed from the well and the process is repeated at each well location moving from the least
contaminated to most contaminated well. If sample collection is not possible due to the well
being purged dry, a sample is collected after recovery using a disposable bailer and as described
in Attachment 2-3 of the QAP. Sample collection follows the procedures described in
Attachment 2-4 of the QAP.
After the samples have been collected for a particular well, the samples are placed into a cooler
that contains ice. The well is then recapped and Mill personnel proceed to the next well. If a
bailer has been used it is disposed of.
Decontamination of non-dedicated equipment, using the reagents in Attachment 2-2 of the QAP,
is performed between each sample location, and at the beginning of each sampling day, in
addition to the pre-event decontamination described above.
4
2.2.2 Piezometer Sampling
Samples are collected from Piezometers 1, 2 and 3, if possible. Samples are collected from
piezometers using a disposable bailer after one set of field measurements have been collected.
Due to the difficulty in obtaining samples from the piezometers, the purging protocols set out in
the QAP are not followed.
After samples are collected, the bailer is disposed of and samples are placed into a cooler
containing ice for sample preservation and transit to the Mill's contract analytical laboratory,
American West Analytical Laboratories ("AWAL").
2.3 Field Data
Attached under Tab B are copies of all Field Data Worksheets that were completed during the
quarter for the nitrate investigation monitoring wells and piezometers identified in Section 2.1.1
and Table 1.
2.4 Depth to Groundwater Data and Water Table Contour Map
Depth-to-groundwater measurements that were utilized for groundwater contours are included on
the Quarterly Depth to Water Sheet at Tab C of this Report along with the kriged groundwater
contour map for the current quarter generated from this data. All well levels used for
groundwater contour mapping were measured and recorded within 5 calendar days of each other
as indicated by the measurement dates in the summary sheet under Tab C. A copy of the kriged
groundwater contour map generated from the previous quarter's data is provided under Tab D.
2.5 Laboratory Results
2.5.1 Copy of Laboratory Results
The analytical results were provided by AW AL. Table 1 lists the dates when analytical results
were reported to the Quality Assurance ("QA") Manager for each well or other sample.
Analytical results for the samples collected for this quarter's nitrate investigation and a limited
list of chloroform investigation nitrate and chloride results are provided under Tab G of this
Report. Also included under Tab G are the results of analyses for duplicate samples and rinsate
samples for this sampling effort, as identified in Table 1. See the Groundwater Monitoring
Report and Chloroform Monitoring Report for this quarter for nitrate and chloroform analytical
results for the groundwater monitoring wells and chloroform investigation wells not listed in
Table 1.
2.5.2 Regulatory Framework
As discussed in Section 1.0 above, the Request, Plan, and CA each triggered a series of actions
on EFRI's part. Potential surficial sources of nitrate and chloride have been described in the
December 30, 2009 CIR and additional investigations into potential sources were completed and
discussed with DRC in 2011. Pursuant to theCA, the CAP was submitted to the Director of the
Division of Radiation Control (the "Director") on May 7, 2012. The CAP describes activities
5
associated with the nitrate in groundwater. The CAP was approved by the Director on December
12, 2012. This quarterly report documents the monitoring consistent with the program described
in the CAP.
3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCEANDDATA VALIDATION
EFRI' s QA Manager performed a QA/Quality Control ("QC") review to confirm compliance of
the monitoring program with the requirements of the QAP. As required in the QAP, data QA
includes preparation and analysis of QC samples in the field, review of field procedures, an
analyte completeness review, and QC review of laboratory data methods and data. Identification
of field QC samples collected and analyzed is provided in Section 3 .1. Discussion of adherence
to Mill sampling Standard Operating Procedures ("SOPs") is provided in Section 3.2. Analytical
completeness review results are provided in Section 3.3. The steps and tests applied to check
field data QA/QC, holding times, receipt temperature and laboratory data QA/QC are discussed
in Sections 3.4.1 through 3.4.7 below.
The analytical laboratory has provided summary reports of the analytical QA/QC measurements
necessary to maintain conformance with National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation
Conference certification and reporting protocol. The Analytical Laboratory QA/QC Summary
Reports, including copies of the Mill's Chain of Custody and Analytical Request Record forms
for each set of Analytical Results, follow the analytical results under Tab G. Results of the
review of the laboratory QA/QC information are provided under Tab H and discussed in Section
3.4, below.
3.1 Field QC Samples
The following QC samples were generated by Mill personnel and submitted to the analytical
laboratory in order to assess the quality of data resulting from the field sampling program.
Field QC samples for the nitrate investigation program consist of one field duplicate sample for
each 20 samples, DI Field Blanks ("DIFB"), and equipment rinsate samples.
During the quarter, one duplicate sample was collected as indicated in Table 1. The duplicate
was sent blind to the analytical laboratory and analyzed for the same parameters as the nitrate
wells.
One rinsate blank sample was collected as indicated on Table 1. Rinsate samples are labeled
with the name of the subsequently purged well with a terminal letter "R" added (e.g. TWN-7R).
The field QC sample results are included with the routine analyses under Tab G.
3.2 Adherence to Mill Sampling SOPs
The QA Manager review of Mill Personnel's adherence to the existing SOPs, confirmed that the
QAJQC requirements established in the QAP and Chloroform QAP were met.
6
3.3 Analyte Completeness Review
All analyses required by the GWDP for nitrate monitoring for the period were performed.
3.4 Data Validation
The QAP and GWDP (August 24, 2012) identify the data validation steps and data QC checks
required for the nitrate monitoring program. Consistent with these requirements, the QA
Manager performed the following evaluations: a field data QA/QC evaluation, a holding time
evaluation, an analytical method check, a reporting limit evaluation, a QC evaluation of sample
duplicates, a QC evaluation of control limits for analysis and blanks, a receipt temperature
evaluation, and a rinsate evaluation. Because no VOCs are analyzed for the nitrate
contamination investigation, no trip blanks are required in the sampling program. Each
evaluation is discussed in the following sections. Data check tables indicating the results of each
test are provided under Tab H.
3.4.1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation
The QA Manager performs a review of all field recorded parameters to assess their adherence
with QAP requirements. The assessment involved review of two sources of information: the
Field Data Sheets and the Quatterly Depth to Water summary sheet. Review of the Field Data
Sheets addresses well purging volumes and stability of five parameters: conductance, pH,
temperature, redox potential, and turbidity. Review of the Depth to Water data confirms that all
depth measurements used for development of groundwater contour maps were conducted within
a five-day period of each other. The results of this quarter's review are provided under Tab H.
Based upon the review of the field data sheets, field work conformed with the QAP purging and
field measurement requirements. A summary of the purging techniques employed and field
measurements taken is described below:
Purging Two Ca ing V:olum s with Stable Field Parameter (within 10% RPD)
Wells TWN-01, TWN-04, and TWN-18 were sampled after two casing volumes were removed.
Field parameters pH, specific conductivity, turbidity, water temperature, and redox potential
were measured during purging. All field parameters for this requirement were stable within 10%
RPD.
Purging a WeU LoDryne. sand StabiUty of a Limited Li.l of Field Parameter
Wells TWN-03 and TWN-07 were purged to dryness before two casing volumes were evacuated.
After well recovery, one set of measurements for the field parameters of pH, specific
conductivity, and water temperature only were taken; the samples were collected, and another set
of measurements for pH, specific conductivity, and water temperature were taken. Stabilization
of pH, conductivity and temperature are required within 10% RPD under the QAP. All field
parameters for this requirement were stable within 10% RPD.
Continuously Pumped Wells
Wells TWN-02, TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-25 are continuously pumped wells. These wells are
pumped on a set schedule per the remediation plan and are considered sufficiently evacuated to
7
immediately collect a sample. As previously noted, TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-25 are
chloroform investigation wells and are sampled under the chloroform program. Data for nitrate
and chloride are provided here for completeness purposes.
During review of the field data sheets, it was observed that sampling personnel consistently
recorded depth to water to the nearest 0.01 foot.
All field parameters for all wells were within the QAP required limits, as indicated below.
The review of the field sheets for compliance with QAP requirements resulted in the
observations noted below. The QAP requirements in Attachment 2-3 specifically state that field
parameters must be stabilized to within 10% over at least 2 consecutive measurements for wells
purged to two casing volumes or to dryness. The QAP Attachment 2-3 states that turbidity
should be less than 5 NTU prior to sampling unless the well is characterized by water that has a
higher turbidity. The QAP Attachment 2-3 does not require that turbidity measurements be less
than 5 NTU prior to sampling. As such the noted observations regarding turbidity measurements
greater than 5 NTU below are included for information purposes only.
• Six well measurements exceeded the QAP' s 5 NTU turbidity goal as noted in Tab H. All
required turbidity RPD's met the QAP Requirement to stabilize within 10%.
EFRI's letter to DRC of March 26, 2010 discusses further why turbidity does not appear to be an
appropriate parameter for assessing well stabilization. In response to DRC's subsequent
correspQndence dated June 1, 2010 and June 24, 2010, EFRI completed a monitoring well
redevelopment program. The redevelopment report was submitted to DRC on September 30,
2011. DRC responded to the redevelopment report via letter on November 15, 2012. Per the
DRC letter dated November 15, 2012, the field data generated this quarter are compliant with the
turbidity requirements of the approved QAP.
3.4.2 Holding Time Evaluation
QAP Table 1 identifies the method holding times for each suite of parameters. Sample holding
time checks are provided in Tab H. All samples were received and analyzed within the required
holding time.
3.4.3 Analytical Method Checklist
All analytical methods reported by the laboratory were checked against the required methods
enumerated in the QAP. Analytical method checks are provided in Tab H. All methods were
consistent with the requirements of the QAP.
3.4.4 Reporting Limit Evaluation
All analytical method reporting limits ("RLs") reported by the laboratory were checked against
the reporting limits enumerated in the QAP. Reporting Limit Checks are provided in Tab H. All
analytes were measured and reported to the required reporting limits, with the exception of
several samples that had increased reporting limits due to matrix interference or required dilution
due to the sample concentration. However, in all of those cases the analytical results were
8
greater than the reporting limit used.
3.4.5 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
Section 9 .1.4 a) of the QAP states that RPDs will be calculated for the comparison of duplicate
and original field samples. The QAP acceptance limits for RPDs between the duplicate and
original field sample is less than or equal to 20% unless the measured results are less than 5
times the required detection limit. This standard is based on the EPA Contract Laboratory
Program National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review, February 1994, 9240.1-05-
01 as cited in the QAP. The RPDs are calculated for duplicate pairs for all analytes regardless of
whether or not the reported concentrations are greater than 5 times the required detection limits.
However, data will be considered noncompliant only when the results are greater than 5 times
the required detection limit and the RPD is greater than 20%.
The duplicate results were within a 20% RPD. Results of the RPD test are provided in Tab H.
3.4.6 Other Laboratory QA/QC
Section 9.2 of the QAP requires that the laboratory's QA/QC Manager check the following items
in developing data reports: (1) sample preparation information is correct and complete, (2)
analysis information is correct and complete, (3) appropriate Analytical Laboratory procedures
are followed, (4) analytical results are correct and complete, (5) QC samples are within
established control limits, (6) blanks are within QC limits, (7) special sample preparation and
analytical requirements have been met, and (8) documentation is complete. In addition to other
laboratory checks described above, EFRI' s QA Manager rechecks QC samples and blanks (items
(5) and (6)) to confirm that the percent recovery for spikes and the relative percent difference for
spike duplicates are within the method-specific required limits, or that the case narrative
sufficiently explains any deviation from these limits. Results of this quantitative check are
provided in Tab H.
The lab QA/QC results met these specified acceptance limits.
The QAP Section 8.1 .2 requires that a Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate ("MS/MSD") pair
be analyzed with each analytical batch. The QAP does not specify acceptance limits for the
MS/MSD pair, and the QAP does not specify that the MS/MSD pair be prepared on EFRI
samples only. Acceptance limits for MS/MSDs are set by the laboratories. The review of the
information provided by the laboratories in the data packages verified that the QAP requirement
to analyze an MS/MSD pair with each analytical batch was met. While the QAP does not require
it, the recoveries were reviewed for compliance with the laboratory established acceptance limits.
The QAP does not require this level of review, and the results of this review are provided for
information only.
The information from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports indicates that the MS/MSDs
recoveries and the associated RPDs for the samples were within acceptable laboratory limits for
the regulated compounds except as indicated in Tab H. The two data recoveries that are outside
the laboratory established acceptance limits do not affect the quality or usability of the data
because the recoveries are above the acceptance limits and are indicative of matrix interference.
Matrix interferences are applicable to the individual sample results only. The requirement in the
9
QAP to analyze a MS/MSD pair with each analytical batch was met and as such the data are
compliant with the QAP.
The information from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports indicates that the Laboratory
Control Sample recoveries were acceptable, which indicate that the analytical system was
operating properly.
The QAP Section 8.1.2 requires that each analytical batch shall be accompanied by a reagent
blank. All analytical batches routinely contain a blank, which is a laboratory-grade water blank
sample made and carried through all analytical steps. For the Mill samples, a method blank is
prepared for all analytical methods. The information from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary
Reports indicates that the method blanks did not contain detections of any target analytes above
the Reporting Limit.
3.4.7 Receipt Temperature Evaluation
Chain of Custody sheets were reviewed to confirm compliance with the QAP requirement in
QAP Table 1 that samples be received at 6°C or lower. Sample temperatures checks are
provided in Tab H. All samples were received within the required temperature limit.
3.4.8 Rinsate Check
Rinsate checks are provided in Tab H. A comparison of the rinsate blank sample concentration
levels to the QAP requirements -that rinsate sample concentrations be one order of magnitude
lower than that of the actual well -indicated that all of the rinsate blank analytes met this
criterion. AI rinsate and DIFB blank samples were non-detect for the quarter.
4.0 INTERPRETATIONOFDATA
4.1 Interpretation of Groundwater Levels, Gradients and Flow Directions.
4.1.1 Current Site Groundwater Contour Map
As stated above, a listing of groundwater level readings for the current quarter (shown as depth
to groundwater in feet) is included under Tab C. The data from this tab has been interpreted
(kriged) and plotted in a water table contour map, provided under the same tab. The contour
map is based on the current quarter's data for all wells.
The water level contour map indicates that perched water flow ranges from generally
southwesterly beneath the Mill site and tailings cells to generally southerly along the eastern and
western margins of White Mesa. Perched water mounding associated with the wildlife ponds
locally changes the generally southerly perched water flow patterns. For example, northeast of
the Mill site, mounding associated with wildlife ponds results in locally northerly flow near
PIEZ-1. The impact of the mounding associated with the northern ponds, to which water has not
been delivered since March 2012, is diminishing and is expected to continue to diminish as the
mound decays due to reduced recharge.
10
Not only has recharge from the wildlife ponds impacted perched water elevations and flow
directions at the site, but the cessation of water delivery to the northern ponds, which are
generally upgradient of the nitrate and chloroform plumes at the site, has resulted in changing
conditions that are expected to impact constituent concentrations and migration rates within the
plumes. Specifically, past recharge from the ponds has helped limit many constituent
concentrations within the plumes by dilution while the associated groundwater mounding has
increased hydraulic gradients and contributed to plume migration. Since use of the northern
wildlife ponds ceased in March 2012, the reduction in recharge and decay of the associated
groundwater mound are expected to increase many constituent concentrations within the plumes
while reducing hydraulic gradients and acting to reduce rates of plume migration. EFRI and its
consultants have raised the issues and potential effects associated with cessation of water
delivery to the northern wildlife ponds during discussions with DRC in March 2012 and May
2013.
The impacts associated with cessation of water delivery to the northern ponds are expected to
propagate downgradient (south and southwest) over time. Wells close to the ponds are generally
expected to be impacted sooner than wells farther downgradient of the ponds. Therefore,
constituent concentrations are generally expected to increase in downgradient wells close to the
ponds before increases are detected in wells farther downgradient of the ponds. Although such
increases are anticipated to result from reduced dilution, the magnitude and timing of the
increases are difficult to predict due to the complex permeability distribution at the site and
factors such as pumping and the rate of decay of the groundwater mound. The potential exists for
some wells completed in higher permeability materials to be impacted sooner than some wells
completed in lower permeability materials even though the wells completed in lower
permeability materials may be closer to the ponds.
Localized increases in concentrations of constituents such as nitrate and chloride within and near
the nitrate plume may occur even when the nitrate plume is under control based on the Nitrate
CAP requirements. Ongoing mechanisms that can be expected to increase the concentrations of
nitrate and chloride locally as a result of reduced wildlife pond recharge include but are not
limited to:
1) Reduced dilution -the mixing of low constituent concentration pond recharge into
existing perched groundwater will be reduced over time.
2) Reduced saturated thicknesses -dewatering of higher permeability layers recetvmg
primarily low constituent concentration pond water will result in wells intercepting these
layers receiving a smaller proportion of the low constituent concentration water.
The combined impact of the above two mechanisms may be especially evident at chloroform
pumping wells MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19, and TW4-20; nitrate pumping wells TW4-22,
TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2; and non-pumped wells adjacent to the pumped wells. The
overall impact is expected to be generally higher constituent concentrations in these wells over
the short term until mass reduction resulting from pumping and natural attenuation eventually
reduce concentrations.
In addition to changes in the flow regime caused by reduced wildlife pond recharge, perched
flow directions are locally influenced by operation of the chloroform and nitrate pumping wells.
11
As shown in the detail water level map provided under Tab C, well defined cones of depression
are evident in the vicinity of all chloroform pumping wells except TW 4-4, which began pumping
in the first quarter of 2010. Although operation of chloroform pumping well TW 4-4 has
depressed the water table in the vicinity of TW4-4, a well-defined cone of depression is not
clearly evident. The lack of a well-defined cone of depression near TW4-4 likely results from 1)
variable permeability conditions in the vicinity of TW4-4, and 2) persistent relatively low water
levels at adjacent well TW4-14.
As of the previous quarter, well-defined cones of depression were also not clearly evident near
nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2, most likely because they had
not had sufficient time to develop. Pumping of these wells began during the first quarter of 2013.
Water level patterns near these wells are expected to be influenced by the presence of and the
decay of the groundwater mound associated with the northern wildlife ponds, and by the
persistently low water level elevation at TWN-7, which is located upgradient of the nitrate
pumping wells. Although operation of the nitrate pumping system had not yet produced a well-
defined impact on water levels, continued operation of the system was expected to produce a
well-defined capture zone that would merge with and enhance the capture associated with the
chloroform pumping system.
During the current quarter, a large decrease in water level at nitrate pumping well TW4-25 has
resulted in an apparently large cone of depression near that well. The large decrease in water
level at TW4-25 combined with decreases at nitrate pumping wells TW4-22 and TW4-24, and
adjacent chloroform pumping wells TW4-19 and TW4-20, has resulted in an apparently large
increase in the combined influence of the nitrate and chloroform pumping systems. The long
term interaction between nitrate and chloroform pumping systems will, however, require more
data to be collected as part of routine monitoring.
As discussed above, variable permeability conditions is one likely reason for the lack of a well-
defined cone of depression near chloroform pumping well TW4-4. Changes in water levels at
wells immediately south of TW4-4 resulting from TW4-4 pumping are expected to be muted
because TW4-4 is located at a transition from relatively high to relatively low permeability
conditions south (downgradient) of TW4-4. The permeability of the perched zone at TW4-6 and
TW4-26, and recently installed wells TW4-29, TW4-30, TW4-31, TW4-33, and TW4-34, is one
to two orders of magnitude lower than at TW4-4. Any drawdown of water levels at wells
immediately south of TW4-4 resulting from TW4-4 pumping is also difficult to determine
because of the general, long-term increase in water levels in this area due to recharge from the
wildlife ponds.
Water levels at TW4-4 and TW4-6 increased by nearly 2.7 and 2.9 feet, respectively, between
the fourth quarter of 2007 and the fourth quarter of 2009 (just prior to the start of TW 4-4
pumping) at rates of approximately 1.2 feet/year and 1.3 feet/year, respectively. However, the
increase in water level at TW4-6 has been reduced since the start of pumping at TW4-4 (first
quarter of 2010) to approximately 0.5 feet/year suggesting that TW4-6 is within the hydraulic
influence of TW4-4 (note: hydrographs for these wells are provided in the quarterly Chloroform
Monitoring Report, EFRI 2013). Water level elevations at these wells are eventually expected to
be influenced by cessation of water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds as discussed above.
Recharge from the southern wildlife pond is expected to continue to have an effect on water
12
levels near TW 4-4, but the effects related to recharge from the northern ponds is expected to
diminish over time as water is no longer delivered to the northern ponds.
The lack of a well-defined cone of depression at TW 4-4 is also influenced by the persistent,
relatively low water level at non-pumping well TW4-14, located east of TW4-4 and TW4-6. For
the current quarter, the water level at TW4-14 (approximately 5528.2 feet above mean sea level
["ft amsl"]) is approximately 12 feet lower than the water level at TW4-6 (approximately 5539.9
ft amsl) and 15 feet lower than at TW4-4 (approximately 5543.3 ft amsl) even though TW4-4 is
pumpmg.
Well TW 4-27 (installed south of TW 4-14 in the fourth quarter of 2011) has a static water level
of approximately 5527.1 ft amsl, similar to TW4-14 (approximately 5528.2 ft amsl). Prior to the
installation of TW4-27, the persistently low water level at TW4-14 was considered anomalous
because it appeared to be downgradient of all three wells TW4-4, TW4-6, and TW4-26, yet
chloroform was not detected at TW4-14. Chloroform had apparently migrated from TW4-4 to
TW4-6 and from TW4-6 to TW4-26 which suggested that TW4-26 was actually downgradient of
TW4-6, and TW4-6 was actually downgradient of TW4-4, regardless of the flow direction
implied by the low water level at TW4-14. The water level at TW4-26 (5538.97 feet amsl) is,
however, lower than water levels at adjacent wells TW4-6 (5539.85 feet amsl), and TW4-23
(5542.96 feet amsl), as shown in the detail water level map under Tab C.
Hydraulic tests indicate that the permeability at TW4-27 is an order of magnitude lower than at
TW4-6 and three orders of magnitude lower than at TW4-4 (see Hydro Geo Chern, Inc. [HGC],
September 20, 2010: Hydraulic Testing of TW4-4, TW4-6, and TW4-26, White Mesa Uranium
Mill, July 2010; and HGC, November 28, 2011: Installation, Hydraulic Testing, and Perched
Zone Hydrogeology of Perched Monitoring Well TW4-27, White Mesa Uranium Mill Near
Blanding, Utah). The similar water levels at TW4-14 and TW4-27, and the low permeability
estimate at TW4-27 suggest that both wells are completed in materials having lower permeability
than nearby wells. The low permeability condition likely reduces the rate of long-term water
level increase at TW4-14 and TW4-27 compared to nearby wells, yielding water levels that
appear anomalously low. This behavior is consistent with hydraulic test data collected from
recently installed wells TW4-29, TW4-30, TW4-31, TW4-33 and TW4-34 which indicate that
the permeability of these wells is one to two orders of magnitude higher than the permeability of
TW4-27 (see HGC, January 23, 2014; Contamination Investigation Report, TW4-12 and TW4-
27 Areas, White Mesa Uranium Mill Near Blanding, Utah).
4.1.2 Comparison of Current Groundwater Contour Map to Groundwater Contour Map
for Previous Quarter
The groundwater contour maps for the Mill site for the previous quarter, as submitted with the
Nitrate Monitoring Report for the previous quarter, are attached under Tab D.
A comparison of the water table contour maps for the current (fourth quarter of 2013) to the
water table contour maps for the previous quarter (third quarter of 2013) indicates more
pronounced drawdowns related to operation of chloroform pumping wells TW4-19 and TW4-20
and nitrate pumping well TW4-25. Nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and
TWN-2 were brought into operation during the first quarter of 2013 and their impact on water
13
level patterns was not clearly evident as of the previous quarter. During the current quarter (as
will be discussed below and in Section 4.2.1 ), a large decrease in water level at nitrate pumping
well TW4-25 has resulted in an apparently large cone of depression near that well. The large
decrease in water level at TW4-25 combined with decreases at nitrate pumping wells TW4-22
and TW4-24, and adjacent chloroform pumping wells TW4-19 and TW4-20, has resulted in
apparently large cones of depression associated with these wells. Otherwise, water levels and
water level contours for the site have not changed significantly since the last quarter. As
discussed in Section 4.1.1, pumping at chloroform well TW4-4, which began in the first quarter
of 2010, has depressed the water table near TW4-4, but a well-defined cone of depression is not
clearly evident, likely due to variable permeability conditions near TW 4-4 and the persistently
low water level at adjacent well TW4-14.
Reported decreases in water levels (increases in drawdown) of approximately 4 feet and 9 feet
occurred in chloroform pumping wells TW4-19 and TW4-20, respectively. Furthermore,
decreases of approximately 2 feet, 3 feet, and 25 feet occurred, respectively, in nitrate pumping
wells TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-25. Changes in water levels at other pumping wells
(chloroform pumping wells MW-4, MW-26 and TW4-4, and nitrate pumping well TWN-2) were
less than 2 feet. Water level fluctuations at pumping wells typically occur in part because of
fluctuations in pumping conditions just prior to and at the time the measurements are taken. A
water level decrease of approximately 3 feet was reported at TW4-21. This decrease is likely the
result of its location between pumping wells TW4-19 and TW4-25. The quarterly Chloroform
Monitoring Report provides additional details on water levels in chloroform pumping wells.
The decreases in water levels (increases in drawdown) at chloroform pumping wells TW4-19
and TW4-20 have increased the apparent capture of these wells relative to other pumping wells.
The large cone of depression associated with nitrate pumping well TW4-25 has resulted in a
relatively large zone of capture associated with this well. Furthermore, the apparent capture
associated with TW4-25 has increased the apparent combined capture of chloroform pumping
wells MW-26, TW4-19, and TW4-20 compared to last quarter.
Water level decreases ranging from approximately 0.55 to 1.4 feet at Piezometers 1 and 2, and
TWN-4, likely result from cessation of water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds as discussed
in Section 4.1.1 and the consequent continuing decay of the associated perched water mound.
The water level decrease of approximately 1.3 feet reported for TWN-1 is likely related to both
decay of the perched water mound and operation of nitrate pumping well TW4-25.
Water level decreases of nearly 5 feet at MW-3, of nearly 4 feet at MW-20, of approximately 6
feet at MW-23 and of approximately 5 feet at MW-37 were reported. These decreases are likely
the result of purging and sampling these wells prior to measuring water levels. Because these
wells have relatively low permeability, there was likely insufficient time for water levels to have
fully recovered from purging prior to water level measurement. Although water was reported to
be present at the bottom of piezometer DR-22 last quarter, DR-22 is reported to be dry this
quarter.
14
4.1.3 Hydrographs
Attached under Tab E are hydrographs showing groundwater elevation in each nitrate
contaminant investigation monitor well over time. Per the CAP, nitrate wells TWN-6, TWN-14,
TWN-16, and TWN-19 have been maintained for depth to groundwater monitoring only. These
hydrographs are also included in Tab E.
As noted in Section 2.1.1, nitrate wells TWN-05, TWN-08, TWN-09, TWN-10, TWN-11, TWN-
12, TWN-13, TWN-15, and TWN-17 were abandoned in accordance with the DRC-approved
Well Abandonment Procedure on July 31, 2013. The historic hydrographs will not be included
in future quarterly reports unless requested by DRC.
4.1.4 Depth to Groundwater Measured and Groundwater Elevation
Attached in Tab F are tables showing depth to groundwater measured and groundwater elevation
over time for each of the wells listed in Section 2.1.1 above.
As noted in Section 2.1.1, nitrate wells TWN-05, TWN-08, TWN-09, TWN-10, TWN-11, TWN-
12, TWN-13, TWN-15, and TWN-17 were abandoned in accordance with the DRC-approved
Well Abandonment Procedure on July 31, 2013. The historic measured depth to groundwater
and groundwater elevation data will not be included in future quarterly reports unless requested
byDRC.
4.2 Effectiveness of Hydraulic Containment and Capture
4.2.1 Hydraulic Containment and Control
The CAP states that hydraulic containment and control will be evaluated in part based on water
level data and in part on concentrations in wells downgradient of pumping wells TW4-22 and
TW4-24.
As per the CAP, the current quarter is the first quarter that hydraulic capture associated with
nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 will be evaluated Hydraulic
containment and control based on water level data will be considered successful per the CAP if
the entire nitrate plume upgradie~t of TW4-22 and TW4-24 falls within the combined capture of
the nitrate pumping wells. Capture zones based on water level contours calculated by kriging the
current quarter's water level data are provided on water level contour maps included under Tab
C. The nitrate capture zones are defined by the bounding stream tubes associated with nitrate
pumping wells. Each bounding stream tube represents a flow line parallel to the hydraulic
gradient and therefore perpendicular to the intersected water level contours. Assuming that the
stream tubes do not change over time, all flow between the bounding stream tubes associated
with a particular pumping well is presumed to eventually reach and be removed by that well.
Capture associated with chloroform pumping wells is also included on these maps because the
influence of the chloroform and nitrate pumping systems overlap.
The specific methodology for calculating the nitrate capture zones is substantially the same as
that used since the fourth quarter of 2005 to calculate the capture zones for the chloroform
15
program, as agreed to by the DRC and International Uranium (USA) Corp. The procedure for
calculating nitrate capture zones is as follows:
1) Calculate water level contours by gridding the water level data on approximately 50-foot
centers using the ordinary linear kriging method in Surfer™. Default kriging parameters
are used that include a linear variogram, an isotropic data search, and all the available
water level data for the quarter, including relevant seep and spring elevations.
2) Calculate the capture zones by hand from the kriged water level contours following the
rules for flow nets:
-from each pumping well, reverse track the stream tubes that bound the capture zone of
each well,
-maintain perpedicularity between each stream tube and the kriged water level contours.
Cones of depression associated with the nitrate pumping wells were not clearly evident as of last
quarter, indicating that hydraulic containment of the portion of the nitrate plume upgradient of
TW4-22 and TW4-24 had not yet been achieved. During the current quarter, decreases in water
levels at nitrate pumping wells TW4-22 and TW4-24, and adjacent chloroform pumping wells
TW4-19 and TW4-20, combined with the large water level decrease at nitrate pumping well
TW4-25, have created apparently significant cones of depression and detectable capture
associated with many of the nitrate pumping wells, in particular TW4-25. The apparent cone of
depression at TW4-25 has expanded the apparent capture of the chloroform pumping system to
the west. The resulting combined capture of both systems appears to encompass nearly half of
the nitrate plume upgradient of TW4-22 and TW4-24.
The actual proportion of the nitrate plume upgradient of TW4-22 and TW4-24 that is under
hydraulic control at the present time is likely less than indicated by the capture zones displayed
on the water level contour maps provided under Tab C. The apparent influence of TW4-25 is
likely overestimated because of the large decline in water level measured in TW4-25 this quarter.
The capture associated with nitrate pumping wells is, however, expected to increase over time as
water levels continue to decline due to pumping and to cessation of water delivery to the
northern wildlife ponds. Slow development of hydraulic capture is consistent with and expected
based on the relatively low permeability of the perched zone at the site. Furthermore, the
presence of the perched groundwater mound, and the apparently anomalously low water level at
TWN-7, will influence the definition of capture associated with the nitrate pumping system.
That pumping is likely sufficient to eventually capture the entire plume upgradient of TW4-22
and TW4-24 as can be demonstrated by comparing the combined average pumping rates of all
nitrate pumping wells for the current quarter to estimates of pre-pumping flow through the nitrate
plume near the locations of TW4-22 and TW4-24. The pre-pumping flow calculation is assumed
to represent a steady state 'background' condition that includes constant recharge, hydraulic
gradients, and saturated thicknesses. Changes after pumping are assumed to result only from
pumping. As will be discussed below, the average combined nitrate pumping rate for the quarter
exceeds the calculated pre-pumping rate of perched water flow through the nitrate plume by a
factor between approximately 1.25 and 2.7.
The cumulative volume of water removed by TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 during
the current quarter was approximately 462,064 gallons. This equates to an average total
16
extraction rate of approximately 3.5 gpm over the 91 day quarter. This average accounts for time
periods when pumps were off due to insufficient water columns in the wells.
Pre-pumping flow through the nitrate plume near TW4-22 and TW4-24 was estimated using
Darcy's Law to lie within a range of approximately 1.31 gpm to 2.79 gpm. Calculations were
based on an average hydraulic conductivity range of 0.15 feet per day (ft/day) to 0.32 ft/day
(depending on the calculation method), a pre-pumping hydraulic gradient of 0.025 feet per foot
(ft/ft), a plume width of 1,200 feet, and a saturated thickness (at TW4-22 and TW4-24) of 56
feet. The hydraulic conductivity range was estimated by averaging the results obtained from slug
test data that were collected automatically by data loggers from wells within the plume and
analyzed using the KGS unconfined slug test solution available in Aqtesolve™ (see Hydro Geo
Chern, Inc. [HGC], August 3, 2005: Perched Monitoring Well Installation and Testing at the
White Mesa Uranium Mill, April Through June 2005; HGC, March 10, 2009: Perched Nitrate
Monitoring Well Installation and Hydraulic Testing, White Mesa Uranium Mill; and HGC,
March 17 2009: Letter Report to David Frydenlund, Esq, regarding installation and testing of
TW4-23, TW4-24, and TW4-25) These results are summarized in Table 6. Data from fourth
quarter 2012 were used to estimate the pre-pumping hydraulic gradient and saturated thickness.
These data are also summarized in Tables 7 and 8.
The average hydraulic conductivity was estimated to lie within a range of 0.15 ft/day to 0.32
ft/day. Averages were calculated four ways. As shown in Table 6 arithmetic and geometric
averages for wells MW-30, MW-31, TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, TWN-2, and TWN-3 were
calculated as 0.22 and 0.15 ft/day, respectively. Arithmetic and geometric averages for a subset
of these wells (MW-30, MW-31, TW4-22, and TW4-24) were calculated as 0.32 and 0.31 ft/day,
respectively. The lowest value, 0.15 ft/day, represented the geometric average of the hydraulic
conductivity estimates for all the plume wells. The highest value, 0.32 ft/day, represented the
arithmetic average for the four plume wells having the highest hydraulic conductivity estimates
(MW-30, MW-31, TW4-22, and TW4-24).
Pre-pumping hydraulic gradients were estimated at two locations; between TW4-25 and MW-31
(estimated as 0.023 ft/ft), and between TWN-2 and MW-30 (estimated as 0.027 ft/ft). These
results were averaged to yield the value used in the calculation (0.025 ft/ft). The pre-pumping
saturated thickness of 56 feet was an average of pre-pumping saturated thicknesses at TW 4-22
and TW4-24.
The hydraulic gradient and saturated thickness used in the calculations are assumed to represent
a steady state 'background' condition. However, assumption of a steady state 'background' is
inconsistent with the cessation of water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds, located
upgradient of the nitrate plume. Hydraulic gradients and saturated thicknesses within the plume
are declining as a result of two factors: reduced recharge from the ponds, and the effects of
nitrate pumping. Separating the impacts of nitrate pumping from the impacts of reduced recharge
from the ponds is problematic. Should pumping cease and 'background' conditions be allowed to
re-establish, however, smaller hydraulic gradients and saturated thicknesses would be expected
due to reduced recharge, which would lower estimates of 'background' flow.
As a result, the 'background' flow calculated using the hydraulic gradient of 0.025 ft/ft and
saturated thickness of 56 feet is considered conservatively large. Furthermore, using the
17
arithmetic average hydraulic conductivity of a subset of plume wells having the highest
conductivities is considered less representative of actual conditions than using the geometric
average conductivity of all of the plume wells. Nitrate pumping may therefore exceed flow
through the plume by a factor greater than 2. 7, the high end of the calculated range.
The CAP states that MW-5, MW-11, MW-30, and MW-31 are located downgradient ofTW4-22
and TW4-24. MW-30 and MW-31 are within the plume near its downgradient edge and MW-5
and MW -11 are outside and downgradient of the plume. Per the CAP, hydraulic control based on
concentration data will be considered successful if the concentrations of nitrate in MW-30 and
MW-31 remain stable or decline, and concentrations of nitrate in downgradient wells MW-5 and
MW -11 do not exceed the 10 mg/L standard.
Table 5 presents the nitrate concentration data for MW-30, MW-31, MW-5 and MW-11, which
are down-gradient of pumping wells TW4-22 and TW4-24. Based on these concentration data,
the nitrate plume is under control.
The plume has not migrated downgradient to MW-5 or MW-11 because nitrate was not detected
at MW-11 and was detected at a concentration less than 1 mg/L at MW-5. Between the previous
and current quarters, nitrate concentrations increased slightly in both MW-30 and MW-31.
Nitrate in MW-30 increased from 17.6 mg/L to 19.5 mg/L and nitrate in MW-31 increased from
21.7 mg/L to 23.9 mg/L. Changes in both wells were less than 20% suggesting the changes are
within the range typical for sampling and analytical error. Although short-term fluctuations have
occurred, nitrate concentrations in MW-30 and MW-31 have been relatively stable,
demonstrating that plume migration is minimal or absent.
Chloride has been relatively stable at MW-30 but appears to be increasing at MW-31 (see Tab J
and Tab K, discussed in Section 4.2.4). The apparent increase in chloride and stable nitrate at
MW-31 suggests a natural attenuation process that is affecting nitrate but not chloride. A likely
process that would degrade nitrate but leave chloride unaffected is reduction of nitrate by pyrite.
The likelihood of this process in the perched zone is discussed in HGC, December 7 2012;
Investigation of Pyrite in the Perched Zone, White Mesa Uranium Mill Site, Blanding, Utah.
4.2.2 Current Nitrate and Chloride Isoconcentration Maps
Included under Tab I of this Report are current nitrate and chloride iso-concentration maps for
the Mill site. Nitrate iso-contours start at 5 mg/L and chloride iso-contours start at 100 mg/L
because those values appear to separate the plumes from background. All nitrate and chloride
data used to develop these iso-concentration maps are from the current quarter's sampling
events.
4.2.3 Comparison of Areal Extent
Although changes in concentration have occurred in wells within the nitrate plume, the
boundaries of the plume have not changed significantly since the last quarter, except that the
kriged plume boundary does not encompass well TW 4-18 as it did last quarter. The primary
reason for this change is that the nitrate concentration at chloroform pumping well TW 4-19,
located between the plume and TW4-18, decreased from approximately 18 mg/L to less than 5
mg/L. Nitrate concentrations at TW 4-18 have continued to increase, however, from
18
approximately 12 mg/L during the previous quarter to approximately 14 mg/L this quarter.
Changes in this area are expected to result from changes in pumping and from the cessation of
water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds. The reduction in low-nitrate recharge from the
ponds appears to be having the anticipated effect of generally increased nitrate concentrations in
wells downgradient of the ponds (see Tab 1 and Tab K, discussed in Section 4.2.4), which is the
expected consequence of reduced dilution as discussed in Section 4.1.1.
Although such increases in concentration have been anticipated as the result of reduced dilution,
the magnitude and timing of the increases are difficult to predict due to the measured variations
in hydraulic conductivity at the site and other factors. Regardless of the specific causes of the
increase, nitrate at TW 4-18 is associated with the chloroform plume, is cross-gradient of the
nitrate plume as defined in the CAP, and is within the capture zone of the chloroform pumping
system (primarily chloroform pumping well MW-26). Perched water flow at TW4-18 is to the
southwest in the same approximate direction as the main body of the nitrate plume.
Nitrate concentrations at the downgradient edge of the plume (MW-30 and MW-31) continue to
be relatively stable, demonstrating that plume migration is minimal or absent. With regard to
chloroform, the boundary of the northern portion of the chloroform plume has moved slightly to
the west toward nitrate pumping well TW4-24 since pumping began. More details regarding the
chloroform data and interpretation are included in the Quarterly Chloroform Monitoring Report
submitted under separate cover.
4.2.4 Nitrate and Chloride Concentration Trend Data and Graphs
Attached under Tab 1 is a table summarizing values for nitrate and chloride for each well over
time.
Attached under Tab K are graphs showing nitrate and chloride concentration plots in each
monitor well over time.
As noted in Section 2.1.1, nitrate wells TWN-05, TWN-08, TWN-09, TWN-10, TWN-11, TWN-
12, TWN-13, TWN-15, and TWN-17 were abandoned in accordance with the DRC-approved
Well Abandonment Procedure on July 31, 2013. The historic trend data will not be included in
future quarterly reports unless requested by DRC.
4.2.5 Interpretation of Analytical Data
Comparing the nitrate analytical results to those of the previous quarter, as summarized in the
tables included under Tab 1, the following observations can be made for wells within and
immediately surrounding the nitrate plume:
a) Nitrate concentrations have increased by more than 20% in the following wells
compared to last quarter: TW4-10, TW4-22, TWN-1 and TWN-2;
b) Nitrate concentrations have decreased by more than 20% in the following wells
compared to last quarter: MW-26 and TW4-19;
19
c) Nitrate concentrations have remained within 20% in the following wells compared to
last quarter: MW-27, MW-30, MW-31, TW4-18, TW4-20, TW4-21, TW4-24, TW4-25,
TWN-3, TWN-4, TWN-7, and TWN-18;
d) MW-11, MW-25 and MW-32 remained non-detect; and
e) TW4-16 increased from non-detect to 1.37 mg/L.
As indicated, nitrate concentrations for 12 of the wells with detected nitrate were within 20% of
the values reported for the wells during the previous quarter, suggesting that variations are within
the range typical for sampling and analytical error. The remaining wells (MW-26, TW4-10,
TW4-19, TW4-22, TWN-1, and TWN-2) had changes in concentration greater than 20%. Of the
latter, MW-26 and TW4-19 are chloroform pumping wells, and TW4-22 and TWN-2 are nitrate
pumping wells. TW4-10 is located adjacent to chloroform pumping well MW-26 and TWN-1 is
located adjacent to nitrate pumping well TW4-25. Fluctuations in concentrations at pumping
wells and wells adjacent to pumping wells likely result in part from the effects of pumping as
discussed in Section 4.1.1. The change at TWN-1 from approximately 1.2 to 1.6 mg/L is also
likely to result from 'noise' due to the low concentrations at this well.
Nitrate pumping well TWN-2 had the highest detected nitrate concentration. Since the last
quarter, the nitrate concentration in pumping well TWN-2 increased from approximately 80
mg/L to 111 mg/L. The nitrate concentration in nitrate pumping well TW4-22 increased from
approximately 30 to 45 mg/L and chloroform increased from 9,640 1-1-g/L to 13,300 1-1-g/L.
Chloroform changes are likely in response to the start-up of nitrate pumping in the first quarter
and are affected by the presence of historically high chloroform concentrations at adjacent, cross-
gradient well TW4-20. MW-27, located west ofTWN-2, and TWN-18, located north ofTWN-3,
bound the nitrate plume to the west and north (See Figure I-1 under Tab I). In addition, the
southernmost (downgradient) boundary of the plume remains between MW-30/MW-31 and
MW-5/MW-11. Nitrate concentrations at MW-5 (adjacent to MW-11) and MW-11 have
historically been low(< 1 mg/L) or non-detect for nitrate (See Table 5). MW-25, MW-26, MW-
32, TW4-16, TW4-5: TW4-25, TWN-1, and TWN-4 bound the nitrate plume to the east. As
discussed above, TW4-18 is outside the kriged plume boundary this quarter (due to a decrease in
concentration at TW4-19, located between the plume and TW4-18), although nitrate in well
TW4-18 continues to increase (from approximately 12. to 14 mg/L between the previous and
current quarters). The increases at TW4-18 (and other nearby wells) are likely the result of the
cessation of water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds and the consequent decay of the
associated groundwater mound. The reduction in low-nitrate recharge from the ponds appears to
be having the anticipated effect of generally increasing nitrate concentrations in wells
downgradient of the ponds as discussed in Section 4 .1.1.
Nitrate concentrations outside the nitrate plume exceed 10 mg/L at a few locations: TW4-10 (16
mg/L), TW4-12 (16.4 mg/L), TW4-26 (15.9 mg/L), TW4-27 (29.8 mg/L), and TW4-28 (16.2
mg/L). All these wells are located southeast of the nitrate plume as defined in the CAP and all
are separated from the plume by wells having nitrate concentrations that are either non-detect, or,
if detected, are less than 10 mg/L. Concentrations at TW4-12 and TW4-27 are within 20% of
their concentrations during the previous quarter. Increased nitrate at TW 4-10 most likely results
from the same factors that resulted in the increases at TW4-18, primarily reduced dilution from
20
the northern wildlife ponds as discussed above. As with TW 4-18, nitrate at TW 4-10 is associated
with the chloroform plume and is within the capture zone of the chloroform pumping system.
Chloride concentrations are measured because elevated chloride (greater than 100 mg/L) is
associated with the nitrate plume. Chloride concentrations at all measured locations are within
20% of their respective concentrations during the previous quarter except at the following
locations: TW4-19 (decreased from 179 mg/L to 134 mg/L); and TW4-25 (decreased from 119
mg/L to 88.6 mg/L). TW4-19 is a chloroform pumping well; and TW4-25 is a nitrate pumping
well. Fluctuations in concentrations at pumping wells and wells adjacent to pumping wells likely
result in part from the effects of pumping. Future increases in concentrations at wells near the
northern wildlife ponds are anticipated as a result of reduced dilution caused by cessation of
water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds.
4.3 Estimation of Pumped Nitrate Mass and Residual Nitrate Mass within the Plume
Nitrate mass removed by pumping is summarized in Table 2, and includes mass removed by both
chloroform and nitrate pumping wells. Table 3 shows the volume of water pumped at each well
and Table 4 provides the details of the nitrate removal for each well. Mass removal calculations
begin with the third quarter of 2010 because the second quarter, 2010 data were specified to be
used to establish a baseline mass for the nitrate plume. As stated in the CAP, the baseline mass is
to be calculated using the second quarter, 2010 concentration and saturated thickness data
"within the area of the kriged 10 mg/L plume boundary." The second quarter, 2010 data set was
considered appropriate because "the second quarter, 2010 concentration peak at TWN-2 likely
identifies a high concentration zone that still exists but has migrated away from the immediate
vicinity of TWN-2."
As shown in Table 2, a total of approximately 767 lb of nitrate has been removed from the
perched zone since the third quarter of 2010. Prior to the current quarter, all direct nitrate mass
removal resulted from operation of chloroform pumping wells MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-
19, and TW4-20. During the current quarter:
• A total of approximately 162 lb of nitrate was removed by the chloroform pumping wells
and by nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2.
• Of the 162 lb removed during the current quarter, approximately 137 lb, (or 85 %), was
removed by the nitrate pumping wells.
Baseline mass and current quarter mass estimates (nitrate+ nitrite as N) for the nitrate plume are
approximately 43,700 lb and 41,150 lb, respectively. Mass estimates were calculated within the
plume boundaries as defined by the kriged 10 mg/L isocon by 1) gridding (kriging) the nitrate
concentration data on 50-foot centers; 2) calculating the volume of water in each grid cell based
on the saturated thickness and assuming a porosity of 0.18; 3) calculating the mass of
nitrate+nitrite as N in each cell based on the concentration and volume of water for each cell; and
4) totaling the mass of all grid cells within the 10 mg/L plume boundary. Data used in these
calculations included data from wells listed in Table 3 of the CAP.
The nitrate mass estimate for the current quarter is lower than the baseline estimate by 2,550 lb,
and this difference is greater than the amount of nitrate mass removed directly by pumping.
21
Changes in the quarterly mass estimates are expected to result primarily from 1) nitrate mass
removed directly by pumping, 2) natural attenuation of nitrate, and 3) changes in nitrate
concentrations in wells within the plume as a result of re-distribution of nitrate within the plume
and changes in saturated thicknesses. Redistribution of nitrate within the plume and changes in
saturated thicknesses will be impacted by changes in pumping and in background conditions
such as the decay of the perched water mound associated with the northern wildlife ponds.
Cessation of water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds is expected to result in reduced
saturated thicknesses and reduced dilution, which in turn is expected to result in increases in
concentrations.
The mass estimate during the current quarter (41,150 lb) was larger than the mass estimate
during the previous quarter (36,930 lb) by 4,220 lb, or approximately 11 %. The primary reason
for this difference is higher nitrate concentrations measured in many wells within the plume this
quarter compared to last quarter especially TWN-2, which increased from approximately 80 to
111 mg/L. Increases are likely to result primarily from the cessation of water delivery to the
northern wildlife ponds and the consequent decay of the associated groundwater mound. The
reduction in low-nitrate recharge from the ponds appears to be having the anticipated effect of
increasing nitrate concentrations in wells downgradient of the ponds. The impact of reduced
dilution, which increases both concentrations and the calculated mass is not completely offset by
reductions in saturated thicknesses (resulting from pumping and groundwater mound decay),
which reduce both the calculated plume volume and calculated mass.
Nitrate mass removal by pumping and natural attenuation (expected to result primarily from
pyrite oxidation/nitrate reduction) act to lower nitrate mass within the plume. Changes resulting
from redistribution of nitrate within the plume are expected to result in both increases and
decreases in concentrations at wells within the plume and therefore increases and decreases in
mass estimates based on those concentrations, thus generating 'noise' in the mass estimates.
Furthermore, because the sum of sampling and analytical error is typically about 20%, changes
in the mass estimates from quarter to quarter of up to 20% could result from typical sampling
and analytical error alone. Only longer-term analyses of the mass estimates that minimize the
impacts of these quarter to quarter variations will provide useful information on plume mass
trends. Over the long term, nitrate mass estimates are expected to trend downward as a result of
direct removal by pumping and through natural attenuation.
As specified in the CAP, once eight quarters of data have been collected (struting with the first
quarter of 2013), a regression trend line will be applied to the quarterly mass estimates and
evaluated. The trend line will then be updated quarterly and reevaluated as additional quarters of
data are collected. The evaluation will determine whether the mass estimates are increasing,
decreasing, or stable.
22
5.0 LONG TERM PUMP TEST AT TWN-02, TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-
25 OPERATIONS REPORT
5.1 Introduction
Beginning in January 2013, EFRI began long term pumping of TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and
TWN-02 as required by the Nitrate CAP, dated May 7, 2012 and the SCO dated December 12,
2012.
In addition, as a part of the investigation of chloroform contamination at the Mill site, EFRI has
been conducting a Long Term Pump Test on MW-4, TW4-19, MW-26, and TW4-20, and, since
January 31, 2010, TW4-4. The purpose of the test is to serve as an interim action that will
remove a significant amount of chloroform-contaminated water while gathering additional data
on hydraulic properties in the area of investigation.
Because wells MW-4, TW4-19, MW-26, TW4-4 and TW4-20 are pumping wells that may
impact the removal of nitrate, they are included in this report and any nitrate removal realized as
part of this pumping is calculated and included in the quarterly reports.
The following information documents the operational activities during the quruter.
5.2 Pumping Well Data Collection
Data collected during the quarter included the following:
• Measurement of water levels at MW-4, TW4-19, MW-26, and TW4-20 and,
commencing regularly on March 1, 2010, TW4-4, on a weekly basis, and at
selected temporary wells and permanent monitoring wells on a monthly basis.
• Measurement of pumping history, including:
pumping rates
total pumped volume
operational and non-operational periods.
• Periodic sampling of pumped water for chloroform and nitrate/nitrite analysis and
other constituents
• Measurement of water levels weekly at TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-02
commencing January 28, 2013, and on a monthly basis selected temporary wells
and permanent monitoring wells.
5.3 Water Level Measurements
Beginning August 16, 2003, water level measurements from chloroform pumping wells MW-4,
MW-26, and TW4-19 were conducted weekly. From commencement of pumping TW4-20, and
regularly after March 1, 2010 for TW4-4, water levels in these two chloroform pumping wells
have been measured weekly. From commencement of pumping in January 2013, water levels in
wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-02 have been measured weekly. Copies of the
weekly Depth to Water monitoring sheets for MW-4, MW-26, TW4-19, TW4-20, TW4-4, TW4-
22, TW4-24, TW4-25 and TWN-02 are included under Tab C.
23
Monthly depth to water monitoring is required for all of the chloroform contaminant
investigation wells and non-pumping wells MW-27, MW-30, MW-31, TW4-21, TWN-1, TWN-
3, TWN-4, TWN-7, and TWN-18. Copies of the monthly depth to Water monitoring sheets are
included under Tab C.
5.4 Pumping Rates and Volumes
The pumping wells do not pump continuously, but are on a delay device. The wells purge for a
set amount of time and then shut off to allow the well to recharge. Water from the pumping
wells is either transferred to the Cell 1 evaporation pond or is used in the Mill process.
The pumped wells are fitted with a flow meter which records the volume of water pumped from
the well in gallons. The flow meter readings shown in Tab C are used to calculate the gallons of
water pumped from the wells each quarter as required by Section 7 .2.2 of the CAP. The average
pumping rates and quarterly volumes for each of the pumping wells are shown in Table 3. The
cumulative volume of water pumped from each of the wells is shown in Table 4.
No operational problems were observed with the wells or pumping equipment during the quarter.
6.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT
There are no corrective actions resulting from the 4th quarter 2013 nitrate sampling event.
6.1 Assessment of Previous Quarter's Corrective Actions
There were no corrective actions in the 3rd quarter 2013 nitrate sampling event.
7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
As per the CAP, the current quarter is the first quarter that hydraulic capture associated with
nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 was evaluated. Capture zones
were based on water level contours calculated by kriging the current quarter's water level data.
The nitrate capture zones are defined by the bounding stream tubes associated with nitrate
pumping wells (as shown in maps under Tab C). Each bounding stream tube represents a flow
line parallel to the hydraulic gradient and therefore perpendicular to the intersected water level
contours. Assuming that the stream tubes do not change over time, all flow between the
bounding stream tubes associated with a particular pumping well is presumed to eventually reach
and be removed by that well.
Cones of depression associated with the nitrate pumping wells were not clearly evident as of last
quarter, indicating that hydraulic containment of the portion of the nitrate plume upgradient of
TW4-22 and TW4-24 had not yet been achieved. During the current quarter, decreases in water
levels at nitrate pumping wells TW4-22 and TW4-24, and adjacent chloroform pumping wells
TW4-19 and TW4-20, combined with a large water level decrease at nitrate pumping well TW4-
25, have created apparently significant cones of depression and detectable capture associated
with many of the nitrate pumping wells, in particular TW4-25. The apparent cone of depression
24
at TW4-25 has expanded the apparent capture of the chloroform pumping system to the west.
The resulting combined capture of both systems appears to encompass nearly half of the nitrate
plume upgradient ofTW4-22 and TW4-24.
The actual proportion of the nitrate plume upgradient of TW4-22 and TW4-24 that is under
hydraulic control at the present time is likely less than indicated by the capture zones displayed
on the water level contour maps (provided under Tab C). The influence of TW4-25 is likely
overestimated because of the large decline in water level measured in TW 4-25 this quarter. The
capture associated with nitrate pumping wells is, however, expected to increase over time as
water levels continue to decline due to pumping and to cessation of water delivery to the
northern wildlife ponds. Furthermore, the evaluation of the long term interaction between nitrate
and chloroform pumping systems will require more data to be collected as part of routine
monitoring. Slow development of hydraulic capture by the nitrate pumping system is consistent
with, and expected based on the relatively low permeability of the perched zone at the site.
Definition of capture associated with the nitrate pumping system will also be influenced by the
perched groundwater mound and the apparently anomalously low water level at TWN-7.
Current pumping is likely sufficient to eventually capture the entire nitrate plume upgradient of
TW4-22 and TW4-24 as demonstrated by comparing the combined average pumping rates of all
the nitrate pumping wells for the current quarter (approximately 3.5 gpm) to estimates of pre-
pumping ('background') flow through the nitrate plume near the locations ofTW4-22 and TW4-
24 (calculated to lie between 1.31 gpm and 2.79 gpm). Calculations indicate that pumping during
the current quarter exceeds the estimated pre-pumping rate of perched water flow through the
nitrate plume by a factor between approximately 1.25 and 2.7, depending on the method used to
calculate the average hydraulic conductivity within the plume. Because the pre-pumping flow
calculations likely overestimate the new 'background' conditions caused by reduced recharge
from the northern wildlife ponds, and because the average plume hydraulic conductivity estimate
from the low end of the calculated range is likely to be more representative of actual conditions,
nitrate pumping may exceed flow through the plume by a factor greater than 2.7.
Fourth quarter, 2013 nitrate concentrations at many of the wells within and adjacent to the nitrate
plume were within 20% of the values reported during the previous quarter, suggesting that
variations are within the range typical for sampling and analytical error. Changes in
concentration greater than 20% occurred in wells MW-26, TW4-10, TW4-19, TW4-22, TWN-1,
and TWN-2. The concentrations in wells MW-11, MW-25 and MW-32 remained non-detect
while the concentration in TW4-16 increased from non-detect to 1.37 mg/L.
Of the wells showing changes in concentration greater than 20%, MW-26 and TW4-19 are
chloroform pumping wells, and TW4-22 and TWN-2 are nitrate pumping wells. TW4-10 is
located adjacent to chloroform pumping well MW-26 and TWN-1 is located adjacent to nitrate
pumping well TW4-25. Fluctuations in concentrations at pumping wells and wells adjacent to
pumping wells likely result in part from the effects of pumping. The change at TWN-1 from
approximately 1.2 to 1.6 mg/L likely results from 'noise' due to the low concentrations at this
well.
The highest nitrate concentration (111 mg!L) was detected at nitrate pumping well TWN-2.
Since the last quarter, the nitrate concentration in TWN-2 increased from approximately 80 mg/L
25
to 111 mg/L. The nitrate concentration in nitrate pumping well TW4-22 increased from
approximately 30 to 45 mg/L and chloroform increased from 9,640 flg/L to 13,300 flg/L causing
the boundary of the northern portion of the chloroform plume to move slightly to the west toward
nitrate pumping well TW4-24. Chloroform changes are likely in response to the start-up of
nitrate pumping in the first quarter and are affected by the presence of historically high
chloroform concentrations at adjacent, cross-gradient well TW4-20.
As discussed in Section 4.2.5, TW4-18 is again outside the kriged plume boundary due to a
decrease in concentration at TW 4-19 (located between the plume and TW 4-18) between the
previous and current quarters. Nitrate at TW4-18 continues to increase (from approximately 12
to 14 mg/L between the previous and current quarters). The increases at TW4-18 (and other
nearby wells) are likely due to the cessation of water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds and
the consequent decay of the associated groundwater mound. The reduction in low-nitrate
recharge from the ponds appears to be having the anticipated effect of generally increased nitrate
concentrations in wells downgradient of the ponds.
Although such increases have been anticipated as the result of reduced dilution, the magnitude
and timing of the increases are difficult to predict due to the measured variations in hydraulic
conductivity at the site and other factors. Regardless of the specific causes of the increase, nitrate
at TW 4-18 is associated with the chloroform plume, is cross-gradient of the nitrate plume as
defined in the CAP, and is within the capture zone of the chloroform pumping system (primarily
chloroform pumping well MW-26). Perched water flow at TW4-18 is to the southwest in the
same approximate direction as the main body of the nitrate plume.
Except in the immediate vicinity of TW4-18, the boundaries of the nitrate plume have not
changed significantly since the last quarter, even though the plume is influenced by reduced
dilution, by nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2, and changes in
concentrations in wells within the plume. Well MW-27, located west of TWN-2, and TWN-18,
located north of TWN-3, bound the nitrate plume to the west and north. In addition, the
southernmost (downgradient) boundary of the plume remains between MW-30/MW-31 and
MW-5/MW-11. Nitrate concentrations at MW-5 (adjacent to MW-11) and MW-11 have
historically been low (< 1 mg/L) or non-detect for nitrate. Wells MW-25, MW-26, MW-32,
TW4-16, TW4-5, TW4-25, TWN-1, and TWN-4 bound the nitrate plume to the east.
Nitrate concentrations at MW-30 and MW-31 continue to be relatively stable, suggesting that
plume migration is minimal or absent. Nitrate in MW-30 increased from 17.6 mg/L to 19.5 mg/L
and nitrate in MW-31 increased from 21.7 mg/L to 23.9 mg/L. Changes in both wells were less
than 20% suggesting the changes are within the range typical for sampling and analytical error.
Based on the concentration data at MW-5, MW-11, MW-30, and MW-31, the nitrate plume is
under control
Chloride has been relatively stable at MW-30 but appears to be increasing at MW-31. The
apparent increase in chloride and stable nitrate at MW -31 suggests a natural attenuation process
that is affecting nitrate but not chloride. A likely process that would degrade nitrate but leave
chloride unaffected is reduction of nitrate by pyrite. The likelihood of this process in the perched
zone is discussed in HGC, December 7 2012; Investigation of Pyrite in the Perched Zone, White
Mesa Uranium Mill Site, Blanding, Utah.
26
The baseline nitrate (nitrate+nitrite as N) plume mass calculated as specified in the CAP (based
on second quarter, 2010 data) was approximately 43,700 lb. The nitrate plume mass estimate for
the current quarter was calculated as 41,150 lb, which was higher than the previous quarter's
estimate of 36,930 lb by 4,220 lb or 11 %. The primary reason for this difference is higher nitrate
concentrations measured in many wells within the plume this quarter compared to last quarter,
especially TWN-2, which increased from approximately 80 to 111 mg/L. Increases are likely due
to the cessation of water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds and the consequent decay of the
associated groundwater mound. The reduction in low-nitrate recharge from the ponds appears to
be having the anticipated effect of increasing nitrate concentrations in wells downgradient of the
ponds. The impact of reduced dilution, which increases both concentrations and the calculated
mass is not completely offset by reductions in saturated thicknesses (resulting from pumping and
groundwater mound decay), which reduce both the calculated plume volume and calculated
mass.
Nitrate mass removal by pumping and natural attenuation (expected to result primarily from
pyrite oxidation/nitrate reduction) act to lower nitrate mass within the plume. Changes resulting
from redistribution of nitrate within the plume are expected to result in both increases and
decreases in concentrations at wells within the plume and therefore increases and decreases in
mass estimates based on those concentrations, thus generating 'noise' in the mass estimates.
Furthermore, because the sum of sampling and analytical error is typically about 20%, changes
in the mass estimates from quarter to quarter of up to 20% could result from typical sampling
and analytical error alone. Only longer-term analyses of the mass estimates that minimize the
impact of these quarter to quarter variations will provide useful information on plume mass
trends. Over the long term, nitrate mass estimates are expected to trend downward as a result of
direct removal by pumping and through natural attenuation.
As specified in the CAP, once eight quarters of data have been collected (starting with the first
quarter of 2013), a regression trend line will be applied to the quarterly mass estimates and
evaluated. The trend line will then be updated quarterly and reevaluated as additional quarters of
data are collected. The evaluation will determine whether the mass estimates are increasing,
decreasing, or stable.
During the current quarter, a total of approximately 162 lb of nitrate was removed by the
chloroform pumping wells and by nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-
2. Of the 162 lb removed during the current quarter, approximately 137 lb, (or 85 %), was
removed by the nitrate pumping wells.
Nitrate concentrations outside the nitrate plume exceed 10 mg/L at a few locations: TW4-10 (16
mg/L), TW4-12 (16.4 mg/L), TW4-26 (15.9 mg/L), TW4-27 (29.8 mg/L), and TW4-28 (16.2
mg/L). All these wells are located southeast of the nitrate plume as defined in the CAP and all
are separated from the plume by wells having nitrate concentrations that are either non-detect, or,
if detected, are less than 10 mg/L. Concentrations at TW4-12 and TW4-27 are within 20% of
their concentrations during the previous quarter. Increases at TW4-10 most likely result from the
same factors that resulted in the increases at TW4-18, primarily reduced dilution from the
northern wildlife ponds as discussed above. As with TW 4-18, nitrate at TW 4-10 is associated
with the chloroform plume and is within the capture zone of the chloroform pumping system.
27
Chloride concentrations are measured because elevated chloride (greater than 100 mg!L) is
associated with the nitrate plume. Chloride concentrations at all measured locations are within
20% of their respective concentrations during the previous quarter except at the following
locations: TW4-19 (decreased from 179 mg!L to 134 mg/L); and TW4-25 (decreased from 119
mg/L to 88.6 mg/L). TW4-19 is a chloroform pumping well; and TW4-25 is a nitrate pumping
well. Fluctuations in concentrations at pumping wells and wells adjacent to pumping wells likely
result in part from the effects of pumping.
Nitrate mass removal from the perched zone increased substantially by the start-up of nitrate
pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 during the first quarter. Continued
operation of these wells is therefore recommended. Pumping these wells, regardless of any short
term fluctuations in concentrations detected at the wells, helps to reduce downgradient nitrate
migration by removing nitrate mass and reducing average hydraulic gradients, thereby allowing
natural attenuation to be more effective. Continued operation of the nitrate pumping system is
expected to eventually reduce nitrate concentrations within the plume and to further reduce or
halt downgradient nitrate migration. Concentration trends are affected by the cessation of water
delivery to the northern wildlife ponds which appears to be having the anticipated impact of
reduced dilution (which is increasing constituent concentrations at some wells) and reduced
hydraulic gradients (which will act in concert with pumping to reduce hydraulic gradients and
reduce plume migration).
While past recharge from the ponds has helped limit many constituent concentrations within the
chloroform and nitrate plumes by dilution, the associated groundwater mounding has increased
hydraulic gradients and contributed to plume migration. Since use of the northern wildlife ponds
ceased in March 2012, the reduction in recharge and decay of the associated groundwater mound
is expected to increase many constituent concentrations within the plumes while reducing
hydraulic gradients and rates of plume migration. EFRI and its consultants have raised the issues
and potential effects associated with cessation of water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds
during discussions with DRC in March 2012 and May 2013.
The impacts associated with cessation of water delivery to the northern ponds are expected to
propagate downgradient (south and southwest) over time. Wells close to the ponds are generally
expected to be impacted sooner than wells farther downgradient of the ponds. Therefore,
constituent concentrations are generally expected to increase in downgradient wells close to the
ponds before increases are detected in wells farther downgradient of the ponds. Although such
increases are anticipated to result from reduced dilution, the magnitude and timing of the
increases are difficult to predict due to the complex permeability distribution at the site and
factors such as pumping and the rate of decay of the groundwater mound. The potential exists for
some wells completed in higher permeability materials to be impacted sooner than some wells
completed in lower permeability materials even though the wells completed in lower
permeability materials may be closer to the ponds.
Localized increases in concentrations of constituents such as nitrate and chloride within and near
the nitrate plume may occur even when the nitrate plume is under control based on the Nitrate
CAP requirements. Ongoing mechanisms that can be expected to increase the concentrations of
nitrate and chloride locally as a result of reduced wildlife pond recharge include but are not
limited to:
28
1) Reduced dilution -the mixing of low constituent concentration pond recharge into
existing perched groundwater will be reduced over time.
2) Reduced saturated thicknesses -dewatering of higher permeability layers receiVmg
primarily low constituent concentration pond water will result in wells intercepting these
layers receiving a smaller proportion of the low constituent concentration water.
The combined impact of the above two mechanisms may be especially evident at chloroform and
nitrate pumping wells and non-pumped wells adjacent to the pumped wells. The overall impact is
expected to be generally higher constituent concentrations in these wells over time until mass
reduction resulting from pumping and natural attenuation eventually reduce concentrations.
8.0 ELECTRONIC DATA FILES AND FORMAT
EFRI has provided to the Director an electronic copy of all laboratory results for groundwater
quality monitoring conducted under the nitrate contaminant investigation during the Quarter, in
Comma Separated Values ("CSV") format. A copy of the transmittal e-mail is included under
Tab L.
29
9.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION
This document was prepared by Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. on February 21, 2014.
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
By:
Frank Filas, P.E
Vice President, Permitting and Environmental Affairs
30
Certification:
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared
under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified
personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the
person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,
and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including~d imprisonment for knowing violations.
Frank Filas, P.E
Vice President, Permitting and Environmental Affairs
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
31
Tables
Table 1
Summary of Well Sampling and Constituents for the Period
"
WeD 1 ~~aruple Colle~tiQn, D3te1
Piezometer 01 10/16/2013
Piezometer 02 10116/2013
Piezometer 03 10/16/2013
TWN-01 10/16/2013
TWN~02 10/16/2013
TWN-03 10/17/2013
TWN-04 10/16/2013
TWN-07 10/16/2013
TWN-07R 10/15/2013
TWN-18 10/16/2013
TW4-22 10/29/2013
TW4-24 10/29/2013
TW4-25 10/29/2013
TWN-60 10117/2013
TW4-60 11114/2013
TWN-65 10/16/2013
Note: All wells were sampled for Nitrate and Chloride.
TWN-60 is a DI Field Blank.
TWN-65 is a duplicate of TWN-01.
TW4-60 is the chloroform program DI Field Blank.
Cominuously pumped well.
Da~of~Lab ReiJort'
10/30/2013
10/30/2013
10/30/2013
10/30/2013
10/30/2013
10/30/2013
10/30/2013
10/30/2013
10/30/2013
10/30/2013
11/7/2013
11/7/2013
unno13
10/30/2013
11/26/2013
10/30/2013
Table 2
Nitrate Mass Removal Per Well Per Quarter
MW-4 TW4-19 TW4-20 TW4-4 TW4-22 TW4-24 TW4-25 TWN-02 Quarter Totals
I'' Quarter (lbs.) MW-26 (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.)
Q3 2010 3.2 0.3 5.8 1.7 4.7 NA NA NA NA 15.7
Q4 2010 3.8 0.4 17.3 1.4 5.1 NA NA NA NA 28.0
Ql 2011 2.9 0.2 64.5 1.4 4.3 NA NA NA NA 73.3
Q2 2011 3.5 0.1 15.9 2.7 4.7 NA NA NA NA 27.0
Q3 2011 3.5 0.5 3.5 3.9 5.4 NA NA NA NA 16.8
Q4 2011 3.8 0.8 6.2 2.5 6.4 NA NA NA NA 19.7
Q1 2012 3.6 0.4 0.7 5.0 6.0 NA NA NA NA 15.9
Q2 2012 3.7 0.6 3.4 2.1 5.2 NA NA NA NA 15.0
Q3 2012 3.8 0.5 3.6 2.0 4.7 NA NA NA NA 14.7
Q4 2012 3.2 0.4 5.4 1.8 4.2 NA NA NA NA 14.9
Q1 2013 2.5 0.4 14.1 1.4 3.6 8.1 43.4 7.5 14.8 95.7
Q2 2013 2.5 0.5 5.6 1.7 3.5 10.7 37.1 6.4 23.9 91.7
Q3 2013 3.0 0.4 48.4 1.4 3.8 6.3 72.8 6.9 33.4 176.5
Q4 2013 3.1 0.3 15.8 1.6 3.9 9.4 75.2 6.4 46.3 162.1
Well Totals (pounds) 46.1 5.9 210.2 30.6 65.5 34.5 228.5 27.3 118.4 767.0
Table 3 Nitrate Well Pumping Rates and Volumes
Volume of Water Pumped
Pumping Well Name During the Quarter (gals) Average Pump Rate (gpm)
MW-4 70,340.4 4.3
MW-26 24,207.6 10.3
TW4-4 60,233.6 7.8
TW4-19 403,974.0 14.0
TW4-20 19,280.2 9.9
TW4-22 24,952.2 18.2
TW4-24 260,555.3 17.8
TW4-25 126,576.5 18
TWN-2 49,979.9 18.3
Table4
Table 4 Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
I' MW-4 MW-26
'
I
I Total
Total Total Pumped Total Total Total Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total
Quarter Pumped (gal) Conc(mg/L) Cone (ug/L) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds) (gal) (mg/L) (ug/L) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds)
Total Gallons
pumped for Total
the quarter Total pumped Total grams/453. I
Calculations from the Concentration Concentration gallons/3.785 Concentration ug/1000000 592 to
and Data Flow Meter from the in mg/LX1 000 to to conver to in ug/L X total to convert to convert to
Origination data analytical data convert to ug/L liters liters grams pounds
03 2010 79859.1 4.8 4800 302266.7 1450880129 1450.9 3.20 63850.0 0.6 600 241672.3 145003350 145 0.32
04 2010 90042.2 5 5000 340809.7 1704048635 1704.0 3.76 60180.0 0.7 700 227781.3 159446910 159 0.35
012011 76247.6 4.6 4600 288597.2 1327546964 1327.5 2.93 55130.0 0.5 500 208667,1 104333525 104 0.23
02 2011 85849.3 4.9 4900 324939.6 1592204042 1592.2 3.51 55800.6 0.3 300 211205.3 63361581 63 0.14
03 2011 85327.7 4.9 4900 322965.3 1582530188 1582.5 3.49 65618.0 0.9 900 248364.1 223527717 224 0.49 I
04 2011 89735.0 5.1 5100 339647.0 1732199573 1732.2 3.82 50191,3 2 2000 189974,1 379948141 380 0.84
012012 90376.4 4.8 4800 342074.7 1641958435 1642.0 3.62 31440.1 1.7 1700 119000.8 202301323 202 0.45 I
02 2012 90916,5 4.9 4900 344118.8 1686181940 1686.2 3.72 26701.2 2.5 2500 101064.1 252660294 253 0.56
Q3 2012 91607.0 5 5000 346732.5 1733662475 1733.7 3.82 25246.0 2.6 2600 95556.1 248445886 248 0.55
04 2012 78840.0 4.8 4800 298409.4 1432365120 1432.4 3.16 30797.0 1.46 1460 116566.6 170187302 170 0.38
012013 62943.7 4.78 4780 238241.9 1138796304 1138.8 2.51 22650.7 2.27 2270 85732.9 194613682 195 0.43 I
02 2013 71187.3 4.22 4220 269443.9 1137053387 1137.1 2.51 25343.4 2.11 2110 95924.8 202401263 202 0.45
03 2013 72898.8 4.89 4890 275922.0 1349258375 1349.3 2.97 25763.0 1.98 1980 97513.0 193075651 193 0.43
Q42013 70340.4 5.25 5250 266238.4 1397751674 1397.8 3.08 24207.6 1.38 1380 91625.8 126443557 126 0.28
Totals Since Q3
2010 1136170.95 46.09 562918.9 5.88
Highlighted cells are the total for the current quarter
Table4
Table 4 Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
TW4-19 TW4-20 I
l : I' I
!Total Pumpecj Cone Cone Total Pumped Total Total Total Pumped Cone Cone Total Pumped Total Total
Quarter (gal) (mg/L) (ug/L) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds) (gal) (mg/L) (ug/L) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds)
I
I
I
Calculations I and Data I
Origination
03 2010 116899.2 5.9 5900 442463.5 2.611E+09 2611 5.76 39098.3 5.3 5300 147987.1 784331447 784 1.73
Q4 2010 767970.5 2.7 2700 2906768.3 7.848E+09 7848 17.30 36752.5 4.6 4600 139108.2 639897778 640 1.41
012011 454607.9 17 17000 1720690.9 2.925E+10 29252 64.49 37187.5 4.4 4400 140754.7 619320625 619 1.37 I
Q2 2011 159238.9 12 12000 602719.2 7.233E+09 7233 15.95 67907.7 4.8 4800 257030.6 1.234E+09 1234 2.72 I
Q3 2011 141542.6 3 3000 535738.7 1.607E+09 1607 3.54 72311.2 6.5 6500 273697.9 1.779E+09 1779 3.92 I
Q4 2011 147647.2 5 5000 558844,7 2.794E+09 2794 6.16 72089.3 4.2 4200 272858.0 1.146E+09 1146 2.53
012012 148747.0 0.6 600 563007.4 337804437 338 0.74 76306.0 7.9 7900 288818.2 2.282E+09 2282 5.03
Q2 2012 172082.0 2.4 2400 651330.5 1.563E+09 1563 3.45 22956.4 11 11000 86890.1 955790963 956 2.11 I
03 2012 171345.0 2.5 2500 648540.8 1.621E+09 1621 3.57 22025.0 10.8 10800 83364.6 900337950 900 1.98 i
Q4 2012 156653.0 4.1 4100 592931.6 2.431E+09 2431 5.36 20114.0 11 11000 76131.5 837446390 837 1.85
012013 210908.0 7.99 7990 798286.8 6.378E+09 6378 14.06 18177.0 9.07 9070 68799.9 624015501 624 1.38 I
Q2 2013 226224.0 2.95 2950 856257.8 2.526E+09 2526 5.57 20252.4 9.76 9760 76655.3 748156060 748 1.65
Q3 2013 329460.1 17.6 17600 1247006.5 2.195E+10 21947 48.39 19731.0 8.65 8650 74681.8 645997873 646 1.42
Q42013 403974.0 4.7 4700 1529041.6 7.186E+09 7186 15.84 19280.2 9.64 9640 72975.6 703484369 703 1.55
Totals Since Q3
2010 3607299.4 210.18 544188.5 30.64
Highlighted cells are the total for the current quarter
Table 4
Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
TW4-4 TW4-22
" I r
Total Total Total Total
Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total
Quarter (gal) (mg/L) (ug/L) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds) (gal) (mg/L) (ug/L) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds)
I I I
Calculations I
and Data II
Origination
Q3 2010 76916.8 7.30 7300.00 291130.1 2.1E+09 2125.25 4.69 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q4 2010 86872.1 7.10 7100.00 328810.9 2.3E+09 2334.56 5.15 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q12011 73360.0 7.00 7000.00 277667.6 1.9E+09 1943.67 4.29 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q2 2011 80334.6 7.00 7000.00 304066.5 2.1E+09 2128.47 4.69 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q3 2011 97535.0 6.60 6600.00 369170.0 2.4E+09 2436.52 5.37 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q4 2011 109043.5 7.00 7000,00 412729.6 2.9E+09 2889.11 6.37 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q12012 101616.8 7.10 7100.00 384619.6 2.7E+09 2730.80 6.02 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q2 2012 87759.1 7.10 7100.00 332168.2 2.4E+09 2358.39 5.20 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q3 2012 80006.0 7.10 7100.00 302822.7 2.2E+09 2150.04 4.74 NA NA NA ' NA NA NA NA
Q4 2012 71596.0 7,00 7000.00 270990.9 1.9E+09 1896.94 4.18 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q12013 58716.8 7.36 7360,00 222243.1 1.6E+09 1635.71 3.61 16677.4 58.0 58000.0 63124.0 3661189622.0 3661.2 8.07
Q2 2013 65603.4 6.30 6300.00 248308.9 1.6E+09 1564.35 3.45 25523.2 50.2 50200.0 96605.3 4849586662.4 4849.6 10.69
Q3 2013 63515.4 7,22 7220.00 240405.8 1.7E+09 1735.73 3.83 25592.9 29.7 29700.0 96869.1 2877013057.1 2877.0 6.34
Q42013 60233.6 7.84 7840.00 227984.2 1.8E+09 1787.40 3.94 24952.2 45.2 45200.0 94444.1 4268872280.4 4268.9 9.41
Totals Since Q3
2010 1113109.1 65.51 92745.7 34.52
Highlighted cells are the total for the current quarter
Table 4
Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
TW4-24 TW4-25
i
I
Total Total ,, Total Total
Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total
Quarter (gal) (mgll) (ugll) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds) (gal) (mgll) (ugll) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds)
Calculations II I
and Data I li
Origination
Q3 2010 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q4 2010 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q12011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q2 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q3 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q42011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q12012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q2 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q3 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q4 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q12013 144842.6 35.9 35900.0 548229.2 19681429751.9 19681.4 43.39 99369.9 9.0 9000.0 376115.1 3385035643.5 3385.0 7.46
Q2 2013 187509.3 23.7 23700.0 709722.7 16820428001.9 16820.4 37.08 147310.4 5.2 5240.0 557569.9 2921666087.4 2921.7 6.44
Q3 2013 267703.5 32.6 32600.0 1013257.7 33032202568.5 33032.2 72.82 145840.9 5.69 5690.0 552007.8 3140924419.0 3140.9 6.92
Q42013 260555.3 34.6 34600.0 986201.8 34122582643.3 34122.6 75.23 126576.5 6.10 6100.0 479092.1 2922461520.3 2922.5 6.44 -
Totals Since Q3
2010 860610.7 228.52 519097.7 27.27
Highlighted cells are the total for the current quarter
Table4
Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
lWN-02
Total
Removed
Total Total by All
Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total Wells
Quarter (gal) (m~) (~) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) Jpounds) (pounds)
I
Calculations
and Data
Origination
Q3 2010 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 15.69
Q4 2010 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 27.97
Q12011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 73.30
Q2 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 27.01
Q32011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 16.82
Q4 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 19.71
Q12012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 15.86
Q2 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 15.D3
Q3 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 14.67
Q4 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 14.92
Q12013 31009.4 57.3 57300.0 117370.6 6725334176.7 6725.3 14.83 95.73
Q2 2013 49579.3 57.7 57700.0 187657.7 10827846433.9 10827.8 23.87 91.71
Q3 2013 50036.5 80.0 80000.0 189388.2 15151052200.0 15151.1 33.40 176.53
042013 49979.9 111.0 111000.0 189173.9 ___1Q9~305286.5 20998.3 46.29 162.07 --
Totals Since Q3
2010 180605.1 118.39 767.Dl
Highlighted cells are the total for the current quarter
Q2
Location 2010
MW-30 15.8
MW-31 22.5
MW-5 ND
MW-11 ND
ND =Not detected
NS =Not Sampled
Table 5
Nitrate Data Over Time for MW-30. MW-31. MW-5. and MW-11 ' ' .
Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2010 2010 2011 2011 2011 2011 2012 2012 2012 2012
15 16 16 17 16 16 17 16 17 18.5
21 20 21 22 21 21 21 20 21 23.6
NS 0.2 NS 0.2 NS 0.2 NS 0.1 NS ND
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2013 2013 2013 2013
21.4 18.8 17.6 19.5
19.3 23.8 21.7 23.9
NS ND NS 0.279
ND ND ND ND ----
TABLE 6
Slug Test Results
(Using KGS Solution and Automatically Logged Data)
Well K
(cm/s}
MW-30 1.0E-04
MW-31 7.1 E-05
TW4-22 1.3E-04
TW4-24 1.6E-04
TW4-25 5.8E-05
TWN-2 1.5E-05
TWN-3 8.6E-06
Average 1
Average2
Average 3
Average 4
Notes:
Average 1 = arithemetic average of all wells
Average 2 =geometric average of all wells
K
(ft/day}
0.28
0.20
0.36
0.45
0.16
0.042
0.024
0.22
0.15
0.32
0.31
Average 3 = arithemetic average of MW-30, MW-31, TW4-22, and TW4-24
Average 4 =geometric average of MW-30, MW-31, TW4-22, and TW4-24
cm/s = centimeters per second
ftlday = feet per day
K = hydraulic conductivity
KGS = KGS Unconfined Slug Test Solution in Aqtesolve TM.
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2013 04\hydrogeochem\FiowCalcs: Table 6
TABLE 7
Pre-Pumping Saturated Thicknesses
Depth to Depth to Water Saturated Thickness
Well Brushy Basin Fourth Quarter, 2012 Above Brushy Basin
(ft) (ft) (ft)
TW4-22 112 53 58
TW4-24 110 55 55
Notes:
ft =feet
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2013 04\hydrogeochem\FiowCalcs: Table 7
TABLE 8
Pre-Pumping Hydraulic Gradients and Flow Calculations
Pathline Boundaries
Path Length Head Change Hydraulic Gradient
(ft) (ft) (ft/ft)
TW4-25 to MW-31 2060 48 0.023
TWN-2 to MW-30 2450 67 0.027
average 0.025
1 min flow (gpm) 1.31
2 max flow (gpm) 2.79
Notes:
ft =feet
ftlft = feet per foot
gpm = gallons per minute
1 assumes width = 1,200 ft; saturated thickness = 56ft; K = 0.15 ft/day; and gradient= 0.025 ft/ft
2 assumes width = 1,200 ft; saturated thickness =56ft; K = 0.32 ft/day; and gradient= 0.025 ft/ft
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2013 04\hydrogeochem\FiowCalcs: Table 8
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
Tab B Order of Sampling and Field Data Worksheets
Tab C Kriged Current Quarter Groundwater Contour Map, Capture Zone Map, Capture Zone Details
Map, and Weekly, Monthly and Quarterly Depth to Water Data
Tab D Kriged Previous Quarter Groundwater Contour Map
Tab E Hydrographs of Groundwater Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab F Depths to Groundwater and Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab G Laboratory Analytical Reports
Tab H Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
H-1 Field Data QNQC Evaluation
H-2 Holding Time Evaluation
H-3 Analytical Method Check
H-4 Reporting Limit Evaluation
H-5 QNQC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
H-6 QC Control Limits for Analyses and Blanks
H-7 Receipt Temperature Evaluation
H-8 Rinsate Evaluation
Tab I Kriged Current Quarter Isoconcentration Maps
Tab J Analyte Concentration Data Over Time
Tab K Concentration Trend Graphs
Tab L CSV Transmittal Letter
Tab A
Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
TW4-19
ffi
MW-5 • TW4-12
0
TWN-7
0
PIEZ-1
perched chloroform or
nitrate pumping well
perched monitoring well
temporary perched monitoring well
temporary perched nitrate monitoring well
~ perched piezometer
TW4-32
~ temporary perched monitoring well
installed September, 2013
RUIN SPRING b seep or spring
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
APPROVED
,.
IIIWlOI
~ ~
~ lWNoOJ
• 1ofW;tt
'f\1$~
~· . 'f&o1
SITE PLAN SHOWING PERCHED WELL
AND PIEZOMETER LOCATIONS
WHITE MESA SITE
DATE REFERENCE
H:/718000/feb14/Uwelloc1213.srf
FIGURE
A-1
TabB
Order of Sampling and Field Data Worksheets
Name
Nitrate
Mg/L
Previous
Qrt.
Nitrate Samples
Date/Purge sample
TWN-7 0.835 I IOj (bJI:\ I D~"Z.b
TWN·l
TWN-4
TWN-18
TWN-3
TWN·2
Duplicate of
Rinsate
DISamp/e
1.24
1.58
2.04
20.9
80.0
-rwJJ -.;I
"'j".vr.J-!.J &
J:~.J..v-'a
Plez 1 7.83
P/ez2 0.198
Plez 3 1.81 ·
\1.)/\t,/i~ 01'2..1
iO/i/,//'3 oz l'i
101ll>!l3 og:s&
10117/13 Ot:.27
\C/ 16/1:.\ DCfSD
\o { tt i•J 0 1 t. 7
lv h~h:J 012.4
iu/•7/1.3 og'-{5
\0/ li./\ '!I \1 0..5
,o/lt.t n iDiO
10/il,/ I 3 I C.3-.1)
u
Nitrate Order
4th Quarter 2013
Depth Total Depth
112.5
125.7
145
96
96
(
Rinsate Samples
Name Date Sample
TWN-7R I TG 11'5/ IC
TWN·1R
TWN·4R
TWN·lBR
TWN·3R
TWN·2R
Samplers:
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I L)T1-I Qv.~der" 1\J iff'jp\fc.. '201~
Location (well name): '-I ....:.Pi..:.1=e.-c.=--~-=O:..:.I _________ ____J
Sampler Name
and initials:
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I \0/ l'/-z01'3 and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: IQ]pump or ~bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
See instruction
I N'/4
Purging Method Used: [QJ2 casings IQ]3 casings
Sampling Event I Q\J:o-r+G('b .10~+.-.... f-t. Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event I p,· G'Z.-0.3
pH Buffer 7.0 /.0 pH Buffer 4.0 ~-"
Specific Conductance!.._ _4_'1_~ ____ _,1~-tMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): ._I _o ____ __,
Depth to Water Before Purging I f-2, r{D Casing Volume (V) 4" ~cll:~_o ___ ~,(.653h)
3' Well :_ " _ (.367h)
Weather Cond. Ext' I Am b. Temp. ·c (prior sampling event)LI..;;;.6_0
__ _...J
Time I \\Ot.j I Gal. Purged I () I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance 1-z.lls I pH I g,73 I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. °C I t~.46 I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) l:;rz.7 I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 9.D I Turbidity (NTU) L J
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. °C I I Temp. °C I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 0 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I -0
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I tJ I
0
6
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients ~ D lOOml D ~ H2S04 ~ D
Heavy Metals D D 250 ml D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologies D D 250 ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume D ~ 0 ~
c'nlor:J( If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I 6::). SD Sample Time \10_5
See instruction
Comment
Arr;v-ea on .s:tc o...f lOSO. -r..,,,er1 G---.rr:,. J D«n o..U prc.S-e11f -h co }7f!!.c-J-.St:4...,f1~.
SC\Mpl~ h._,'leA "\t!J c=.ol)-eLi-cA c:o.:+ liO.S 'l.,)~+c:r \A)e..,S f\1.o,sf~ GJ~-r.
LeJ:!-.S j-}<:. ~~ )\ 12..
Piez-01 10-16-2013 loo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I yn G.v:c;;fcr "'l+rJ't zotS
Sampler Name
See instruction
Location (well name): '-1 _pj_.1o::~:..:"Z:....-...;O~~..::::.._ ________ __, and initials: I -r;..,ner Ho iJ;J~j M
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I lu/U./ 'ZOI~ and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: IQ]pump or [][)bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I N/A
Purging Method Used: IQ]2 casings IQ]3 casings
Sampling Event I Qu.G.r-\-u\"\ N ,±ro..ts Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event Ll_-r\_w_JJ_-_o_z _____ -'
pH Buffer 7.0 /.0 pH Buffer 4.0 '-U5
Specific Conductance '-1 -'Cf-'<1-.:~ ____ _.l ~MHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): ._I _o ____ .........
Depth to Water Before Purging I 3Z ,g~ Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:~_o ___ ---i,(.653h)
3" Well:_ o . (.367h)
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling event)LI...:::b_11 __ ......~
Time I ll:>O'\ I Gal. Purged I 0 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I 7Dl I pH I 7.Lt5 I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc ll>.47 I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I z qo I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I b.!> I Turbidity (NTU) I J
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I 'D
Time to evacuate two casing, volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I ~ I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) l o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labsl L.. ...ce-£..:W~A:....l.. _____ ----J
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D 0 HCL D
Nutrients ~ D 100 ml 0 ug H2S04 ~
Heavy Metals 0 D 250 ml D D HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologies D D 250ml D D No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 I,OOOml D D HN03 D
Other (specify) ril D Sample volume D ~ D
Ghlor;k, If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth '-'-1 ~~·-1 j..__ __ ___, Sample Time \010
Comment
Arriv~a or'\ s•1-c ~ ~
6.tl~ GoH~ ~flt:'$.
L~ s.i+G {A.+ )Ol't
See instruction
--r', .. M,er 1 G-o-.t"ri11 1 Dee" ~n pn::s~.} -h. b.,.rJ
CI>JI-uJ-cJ ~}'OlD. wo..ier w~ Mt::Ei.f~ G)ea.r~
Piez-02 10-16-2013 JDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
0
D
D
D
~
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I lf'h Qu.o.rl"er A:J;:tfl,J~ -z.of3
~ See instruction
Location (well name): ~.-l __;p_,_·-e_"Z..;...-_D_3 _________ _,
Sampler Name
and initials: 1..-r;. ... ,..cr No u:IJ ;J/'1t1
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I \ D/J fo/ ZOI~ and Sampling (if different) .......,/A ~-~-------~
Well Purging Equip Used: [QJ pump or [ID bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) ..V/..4 ~~~-----~
Purging Method Used: @2 casings 1![]3 casings
Sampling Event I o~c.r"tcrb 1\);+(~fc Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event ~.-I_P_i_-c:_-z_~_az.. ______ ~
pHBuffer7.0 ._1_1_,0 ___ _. pH Buffer 4.0 Lj.o
Specific Conductance ._I -~'-'1'-'1 ____ _,h.tMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): ._I _0 ____ __,
Depth to Water Before Purging I 1...\S, '\5 Casing Volume (V) 4" Well.:~_o ___ --1,(.653h)
3" Well:_ 0 . (.367h)
Weather Cond. Ext'l Am b. Temp. oc (prior sampling event)'--1 ~6-"--~
Time I \03~ I Gal. Purged I !> I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I -z. ~ L-1-:::, I pH I ll, bn I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I ~~.51 I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I '2..37 I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I ~.r: I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged ' gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate Q). in gpm. Time to evacuate two cas ing volumes (2V)
s16o = ._I ...........;.o ___ ...J T=2V/Q= In I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) l o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I ...... A~\fJ-~_1--______ __,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100 ml D ~ H2S04 ~
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml 0 0 HN03 D
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 I,OOOml 0 D HN03 0
Other (specify) 'tJ 0 Sample volume 0 !!! D
Ghlor;~<. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth ._I _5_7_._7_2 __ _. Sample Time ._l_10_3b ___ __.
See instruction
Comment
Arri'lld on strc (;A.':t l025.~ner, C-o..rr:nl De-QJ I tJ./1 pr~C/1-r -h. .be...'] .!lf.i~~
~~]e3 bc;,.;Jd a.-1-}03.5. \).)~er '...)4-S \'t'lDSi1..j Oe~.r. L.Jf S ;-h: ~t 1041/
Piez-03 10-16-2013 lno not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
~
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2 -Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I 4Th Qu.~r+« .N i+r ... fc:. -z.o l3
See instruction
Location (well name):!,_ _T_W-"W_-_0_1 _________ __,
Sampler Name
and initials: 11":nna Jt.lliJ'\j/--rH
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging ._I ...;..lt>-'/--'~ ........ /_-z.;...o....:.\).....__~~~_.1
16/lbJ2oll'
and Sampling (if different) ...v/A '-----------~
Well Purging Equip Used: 00 pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I 6-riAnJOf'o..S
Purging Method Used: 002 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event I Q ~o..rf.srl!:J ;vif1'~=t<. Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event ._l_...,-_w_AJ_-_0_7 _____ ~
pH Buffer 7.0 L-1_7...:....;..;;.0 ___ ---l
Specific Conductance ._I _'1.:...'1-'-j+-----~~ !!MHOS/ em
Depth to Water Before Purging I .Sz;.c:to
Weather Cond.
Time I 0/~l.f I Gal. Purged I 55
Conductance I g~o I pH I "-'1~
Temp. °C 11'\.5'\ I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I :!"9 I
Turbidity (NTU) I Zl:JO I
Time I CY7Zf. I Gal. Purged I i7
Conductance I ~S'q I pH 1 7 .-zn
Temp. °C 1'9·bl I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 3~5 I
Turbidity (NTU) 15b I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
I
I
I
I
pH Buffer 4.0 Y.o
Well Depth(O.Olft): '-1 _11_'2._._5_0 __ __,
Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:! 3b.3D 1(.653h)
3" Well:._. _o ___ ~. (.367h)
Ext' I Am b. Temp. 0( {prior sampling eventl.._l .;;.e:,_• __ ...J
Time I o1'2S I Gal. Purged I bb I
Conductance I ~g1 I pH I (.,}'/ I
Temp. oc I 1 ~.~1 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1591 I
Turbidity (NTU) I 'Sb .-z. I
Time 1017.7 I Gal. Purged I g~ I
Conductance I B~ I pH 11. z.Z I
Temp. oc I ]q, z;;g I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 3'50 I
Turbidity (NTU) I S~ I
1 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP}
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q) in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I ll T = 2V /Q = I b. w I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) l o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated If)
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients Bl 0 100 ml 0 [81 H2S04 ~ 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Al'l Other Non Radiofogic,s 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross A lpha 0 D 1,000 ml D D HN03 0 0
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume D r,l 0 ~
c.\, \ot")ae.. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I 17, '55 Sample Time 07Z/
See instruction
Comment
TWN-01 10-16-2013 IDa not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan {QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I q J ~ b>"'GV1=er /\H+r~1"t::-'2..013
See instruction
Location (well name): ._l_:r..l......;W~N;:;.._-_o_-z.. ________ __J
Sampler Name
andinitials: I =r:,,u-tloJJ~d4.j /IB
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging l l0/1"/'ZOI~ and Sampling (if different) L--....V.-~_~.:__ ______ __J
Well Purging Equip Used: 00 pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I C"n:}Jt'l u.O~
Purging Method Used: [QJ2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I Q..,..().r-\-e .-h N rh·J; Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event .... 1_-ri_ltJ_W_-_0.3 ______ __,
pH Buffer 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 4.0
Specific Conductance ._I 9....:...:.~-Lj ____ _,I ~-tMHOS/ em wen Depth(O.Olft): L-1 _~_z;_.o_o __ ___,
Depth to Water Before Purging j 'Z./. Z:"' Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:l L.Jl:\.{3 1(.653h)
3'' Well: o (.367h) L.......='------'
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling event)L.,;I b=---6 __ _,
Time I ~q q tJi I Gal. Purged I ~ 0 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I 0
Conductance 1357"1:, I pH I 6.C:3 I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I \1>.5'1 I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~0 I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I l'} I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q) in gptl1.
S/60= I Jg.6
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two ca ·ing volumes (2V)
T= 2V/Q= I 0 I
lo
I ~
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y
VOCs D 0 3x40 ml D D HCL 0
Nutrients 'El D 100 ml 0 t9 H2S04 ~
Heavy Metals D D 250 ml D D HN03 D
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 D 1,000 ml 0 D HN03 0
Other (specify) "jJ 0 Sample volume 0 'ID 0
Ghlor;dc If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth 1 ...... _~_.,_· ___ _. Sample Time
q3.Lll .
See instruction
Comment
Ar .. ~\le.d on s.~te ri!'" D~L1 4. ~-.n-er 1 G_.,.J..,, Pe-Cfl G\11 pre::.ctd-+o coJlc:d-:seo""fl~s,
S:,o.rr~p\c..s Goi\ed-ca tA.+ oqf.D. L~+\-.S ;-3z: o.f O'JSL.f, ~4--c:r l.Dc.t.S c.lc;o.r-,
TWN-02 10-16-2013 lno not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
D
D
~
2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I 91 h Q"'~r:h~r .AJ :+r.,d:c, Z013
Location (well name): IL-Ti_w_A>_~_C>3 __________ __.
Field Sample ID
Sampler N arne
and initials:
See instruction
Date and Time for Purging ._P_o_)_IV_l._o_n _____ ___. and Sampling (if different) 10 )17/zot3
Well Purging Equip Used: (![]pump or jiD bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) G"rv.ndfd"os
Purging Method Used: IT:[] 2 casings jiD 3 casings
Sampling Event I Gv.~r:b::r 8 A) ~ol\f<. Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event l.____~_~_w_;v_-_18 _____ __,
pH Buffer 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance 1~.-_0!_'f...,i ____ _JI ~-tMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): ~..1 _'i;_,_.o_o __ ___.
Depth to Water Before Purging I '37. 2.D Casing Volume (V) 4" WeJJ:I :S&-~'1 ,(.653h)
3" Well: n (.367h) L---------1
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling eventll,_ 5_' __ __,
Time I 0'9~ I Gal. Purged I 5'2. I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I ZL\";)g I pH I z;.~:c I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I 'I'\ ."19 I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I :zgg I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) 1 bl I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I Ob1:7 I Gal. Purged I D I Time I o,,g I Gal. Purged l o I
Conductance 124545 I pH I7.Z'L I Conductance I -z..ct=,~ I pH I 7·11 I
Temp. OC 1 1~.so I Temp. oc I Jq .q7 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 5Z gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q)., in gpm.
S/60 = 1..__--'\:..:L.J __ ___J
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I ,_qg I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 11.35
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs L..l ~A.:..W---=-.:A:....L.. _____ ----.~
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml D 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients [i 0 100 ml D l!l H2S04 ~ 0
Heavy Metals D D 250 ml D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologies 0 D 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml D 0 HN03 D 0
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume D 1St D ~
G ~)orid-c... If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth l._q_3_:z_o ___ __. Sample Time
See instruction
Comment
Arr;-.JeA on s;+c:. ~ O'i Zl ~t1nCI' I &~ .. .,.;fl} t:>~~/1 ~11 pr~~'C(I-r ~( f'"'("~~~ Pv.r~ be"t.VJ ~1
043\. Pv.r~c~ l..)e\l for-,... 1-J-,._\ oJ:' Li rVJ;J1,,.,;te.5 ~ 45 .S~G£)nJs. R -eJ well J~ ~ VJ~t-(( w<A.S Mo~~ c.l<r.U. Pv.r~~ ~ntletl o..+ OCf:iS L-cJ:} s if~ ~t o~
Ardw:.J.. M\ ~,=f-t: q+ of... Z3, -r;,f'!et"" a.fiJ. G-""a;'l pr~sUJ-J-76 Gollc.c:,+ s~~.....,flo..i . D~p..J-h +o lll)o-..+c.r Wq5 3£ .77, _s,._,..,~J0 .b,.,,'Jc~ ad-0 f:.Z7, L& .$1:.}-c. a-J-0'3o
TWN-03 10-16-2013 lno not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2 -frrata
Gro~ndwater M_onitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA U~'IUM MILL : .(.~ See instruction
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I y~ Q ~ .-·\~,.. t\J -: \-r•\+-<':.--z.or~
Location (well name): ~.-1 :r--~--,;w:..:....:..:tJ:....-_0:::::..._:4 _________ ~
Sampler Name
and initials: 1---r:t1t1<.r HG ii;J,~'l )-rl
Field Sample ID I T WAl -0 _IDi6LOi:3
Date and Time for Purging I 1 0 I I (;,/-t-o i ·", and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: @]pump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: 002 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event I '-"~Y+"C.rl "'\ .I\) ;tr~t-<: Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event L...l_-r_w_AJ_-_c_l _____ __J
pH Buffer 7_0 /.0 pH Buffer 4_0 y .o
Specific Conductance ~.-l _<i:....'1:....Jj~....._ __ __Jl ~MHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): I rz.s :7o
Depth to Water Before Purging I Y q. 02. Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:' s_o.o·7 ,(.653h)
3" WeiJ : D (.367h) '--"<------'
Weather Cond. G\t:A.,r Ext'l Amb. Temp. "C (prior sampling event)~.-1 ..::2.:....." __ _J
Time I O&ll I Gal. Purged I g,~ I Time I D& IZ. I Gal. Purged I Cf1:1 I
Conductance I !OS9 I pH I /.11.--j I Conductance I IDf.O I pHI 7 .17 I
Temp. °C I 1'4 .:\~ I Temp. oc I ~4 .4~ I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I -:wz. I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 7;"1'1 I
Turbidity (NTU) I 300 I .,
~ ] Turbidity (NTU) I '31D
Time I ogt~ I Gal. Purged I ~10 I Time I O&l t I G-Jl. Purged I ~I I
Conductance I IO.S6 I pH 17.1l( I Conductance 110 57 I pH I 7.18 I
Temp. °C I }g .gg I Temp. oc [E.Y9 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I -z..ttt,. I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I Z.'l'Z I
Turbidity (NTU) I -~~{, I Turbidity (NTU) I )~S I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater A 1 of2 capturx· COMPATIBLE WfTH,....-"-.... ..:Oii:r--fUHCTIONAUTY
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP) . ..
Volume of Water Purged [ Z.l gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q) in gpm.
S/60 = 1-j ____:1....~..\ ------1
Time to evacuate two c~sti1g volumes (2V)
T = 2VIQ = I '1.1 () I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) I b
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated Jo
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ._I ...~A:.!,.W.:.;..;..A'-=L;;:.._ ____ ____j
Type of Sample
VOCs
Nutrients
Heavy Metals
Ail Other Non Radiologies
Gross Alpha
OtllCr (specify)
C:h~or)Jc
final Depth lt-..::t.:....o..:.:.5=-· ·.:....1 __ _...J
~
:1comment
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate
if other than as
y N specified below)
0 0 3x40 ml
~ 0 IOOml
0 D 250m!
0 0 250 ml
D D l,OOOml
1il D Sample volume
Sample Time
Filtered Preservative Type Preservative Added
y N y N
0 0 HCL 0 0
D [:st H2S04 5(J' 0
0 D HN03 0 0
0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
0 0 HN03 0 0
D (jJ 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity ofPresetvative:
See instmction
A \ .l \ jr.:d ..-!" •. • L r> I I r d vetl. Of\ s.t--r~ 0.:1 0 .:;)~ . l '\nflt:r1 &-o..r r•11 , ~.z~n 4 1/ pre.S ~/'f'T 1--o ..-f·""r~e ,1nd '<~111ph,-,\j e veAJ-·
fw-5~ b~j'u'l ;.f 0303 . 'Pu..r~e~ iAJe ll .Per •' +6ta.l ot II m;ov,-lc.__s. wr-1tcr Wtt.J •"-M.).k\) WJ,;f -e.
bv.:t \.) ~ Slow~ c )c,;..r; :._J ·:Y'hn'-':.jh o ...::t-·1-\--.::.. pv..r~e. , 'P~r~c:. a.Je.~\ (lYl J. &.a Mple..$ U>/le<..~cl
.,} oiS!Y . L,~{\--s ~h:. e.+ o JJ 11 .
D-aT'\ ijo,1.,-jof\ w~·tl, 'the. s+cJ<. 0+ l}.t~h Qr\ ::.:+c. tc, spt+ SG.IVI:p}cs .
._ ________ -..~Do not touch this cell'(SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater ~ 2 of2 Capturx· COMPATIBLE WITH_./'-W~<>rir--FUH<TIONALITY
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I Cfnl Gv."'rlcr 1\Hfrq.+e "Z.0)3
W See instruction
Location (well name ):I~... _'"T'W __ tJ_-_0_1;........ ________ __,
Sampler Name
and initials: 1-=t";,~ No lh'J\:1/-r-fl
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I \0)15/zop and Sampling (if different) '--'-'lO=/'--'-'Ib/;;;..__Z_o--'13=-------'
Well Purging Equip Used: [![)pump or [ill bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I U'f "'~({Po5
Purging Method Used: 002 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I Qu.&...-f-ertj A) i~c~"'h Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event I --rw.N-.. Y1R
pH Buffer 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 t.t.D
Specific Conductance L.l _4-L~..:.q..:... ___ ...Jl !J.MHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): I05.oo
Depth to Water Before Purging I 8'-.'10 Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:~...;;..ll.;..;..~gJ~---1~(.653h)
3" Well:. o . (.367h)
Weather Cond. C.lov.J~ Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling eventl~...l _5_6 _ __,
Time loi44 I Gal. Purged llt:J I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I \L.b\ I pH I b •~S I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I ,g ,3~ I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 3'-t~ I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I wg I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time j06ZS I Gal. Purged I l> I Time jObZb I Gal. Purged 10 I
Conductance l ll'l't I pH I ;,Jq I Conductance 1 l :Z:oo I pHI 7.Jz I
Temp. °C lllf,-z..Gt I Temp. oc I \q.3t I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in grm.
S/60 = ._I _);;..:.) __ ___,
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 2-Pi I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) I \. bO
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients ~ D 100 ml D M H2S04 ~ D
Heavy Metals D D 250 ml D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologies D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) riJ D Sample volume D I» D I}}
G ~ lorrd(' If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I \I ::..~! Sample Time I D6?.5
See instruction
Comment
1\rr;"d, on ~i-h::. o.+ ol3g' . ..,-;nr1Gr' o.nal 6-tA-ff';t'l Pr-e.se.n-}-J: r f>""'r,e. 'fv.~~"<~ b1!.~~ oJ-
0/~3 P4cJ w-e~~~ ~... 1 Mi1lv.,i--c... liS St:.cor1J.s . fU\If'~d W'(,ll J.r(j. lNo..+u-LOoO ~
1.·~~ I,,,.~ '.....r'J"\ 61.,\~a .. J-'-"1'-P·-1. \~ ~~t~ ~ 0"1'\b
ArrhlGA 01\ ~n-e a.+ 0b1.0, -r;.nner ~,A G-o..rr•'., r<'G.S,1:_(\+ +o Go lie<:,+ .S~'VY~fles~
S tAl\'\ rle~ b"'".'Jea ~rtJ. c:.ol \ec.tc:J a..+-06ZS. Le-J+ S•'+e. a:t 0 <3<:lS De.~ h \NrJ-u l..l~ 47.0l
TWN-07 10-15-2013 jDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I o/~ Qv.w-f~,... A) ~frO\.fe s~tv~pl ··~ (.0\~
See instruction
Location (well name); ._l--'-r\\)'--'--'=..;...·,v_-_0--'7_R....;..._ _______ __,
Sampler Name
and initials: 1:::rc..nner Holi.'Jo.;i!rH
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I \0/15/7.0 13 and Sampling (if different) .__.M~:Ii'a;..;.... _______ _J
Well Purging Equip Used: (!]pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) ._I _""'..:...I.;...;A;.._ _____ -J
Purging Method Used: !m2 casings 1m3 casings
Sampling Event I QV\o.rtu·J~ N ;OJOr.o..+<. Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event ._I_AJ_V_A _______ __,
pH Buffer 7.0 1.0
Specific Conductance L-1 ....:'1....:9_..:.'1 ___ --lh.t.MHOS/ em
Depth to Water Before Purging 1~...-...;o:._ __ ---J
Weather Cond.
Time 1 072.3 I Gal. Purged ll3D
Conductance I -z...'2. I pH I G..03
Temp. oc 114.\7 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I :nzt I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
Time I I Gal. Purged I
Conductance I I pH I
Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
I
I
I
I
pH Buffer 4.0 4.0
Well Depth(O.Olft): ._I _o ____ _J
Casing Volume (V) 4" WeJI:~~----11(.653h)
3" W II:_ 0 . (.367h)
Ext'l Amb. Temp. ·c (prior sampling event)L-1 .5_0 __ _,
Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I J
Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged lSD gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate Q) in b'Pm.
S/60 = ._I _l....J...l __ _..
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two a ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 0 I
lo
lo
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ~..l_lt;....'W___;_A_L ______ ....~
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients rn D 100 ml D I] H2S04 ~ D
Heavy Metals D D 250 ml D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologies D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume D r!l D lSI
c h \cH·;J-c If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth ._I -~0 ____ __, Sample Time 072.'-J
See instruction
Comment
Arri\)e~ Ofl ~1i-c. o.,}07Jb -(..,.•ntef"" o.nJ &o..<r;" f~'eSeY'I.f -hr-r ,'n.so.+e . 'R t~.s~te be~"'n ~t
0710 'P V..f¥'1 r~~ 50 (}-~~. 11 0 ".J o.r ~o~p ~w+-c.r o.nt.\ JbO ~A110fi.S o.f' P:L w~-ler.
~tkfVl~\~ c. o I ~eG-\-e:~ tkl 677..Y L~ -R-.s 1i-e.. ~J 0'77.7
TWN-07R 10-15-2013 Jno not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I Yf\\ GJ\AO..<"'ler 1\)fTrt.:«c... "2:0 1'3
Location (well name): .__1_"'11_· _W...:...AJ..;...-_l:..:::g'--------------J
Field Sample ID
Sampler Name
and initials:
See instruction -·
Date and Time for Purging I 10/l 'Jzo.c and Sampling (if different) L---"'-/-~-------___J
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) &ri.Nf\Uo~
Purging Method Used: (ID2 casings [QJ3 casings
I lw~'~'-O"l Sampling Event I Gv.~r:ft-rl,~ AJ ,·:},~:fo:: Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event._ _________ __,
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 I t:J .o
Specific Conductance ._I _'t_'\_'i ____ ..JI !!MHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): 195.00
Depth to Water Before Purging I 58 ,i'f 4" Well:! ~b:2..~ ,(.653h)
3" Well: D (.367h) .___ ___ __,
Casing Volume (V)
Weather Cond. Ext'l Am b. Temp. ·c (prior sampling eventli'-'3""-• __ ____...J
Time I 081;.5 I Gal. Purged I ,1 I Time I 08-S' I Gal. Purged I llO I
Conductance 1 -z-zoo I pH I'· <6.5 I Conductance l zze~o I pHI ~-"E/ I
Temp. °C lk' lG:~s 1 Temp. oc 1 rq.3ro I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I -z.211~ I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I Z. 11 I
Turbidity (NTU) I H5r.5 I Turbidity (NTU) 1 l<>3"1 I
Time I oa57 I Gal. Purged I n., I Time I oar;g I Gal. Purged I t3'f. I
Conductance I 'Z:OZ:H5 I pH IE>·&S I Conductance I ·z:z.a t I pHI ~-!'5 I
Temp. °C I lq.~t; I Temp. °C 119-'to I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 2:~~ I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 'Z<:flf I
Turbidity (NTU) I JO~g I Turbidity (NTU) I Jostf I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q). in gpm.
S/60 = I \\ Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I )0 .?..3 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) l o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I._»_W_~_L _____ __,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs D 0 3x40 ml D 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 1!] 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2S04 -~ 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml D D HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologies D 0 250ml D D No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha D 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) 'tl D Sample volume 0 ~ D lJ
Ghlorla-c If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I bO,'Z~ Sample Time ._I _tJ_S£>...:....::...8'_-----~
See instruction
Comment
A.-r:\Jdv Of\ ~rh:. 01.-t og~3 -rOI/IriC'j Cr~>-rritll D~I'}J .,_1} p~~~ ~r'" py,r~-e.~nJ .s~_,.,p1·~ ~l)ey;;/,
Pv.r~.::_ be.jCV'> ~i-' ogLU -"'-J~d Vf51ls .f;.r (}.. +oi-to.\ b.f )"Z. V'llf\.v.+C4 ucd-cr IIJA...S. ... ,.,IJJ<~ aJJ,,ft:
"b,J-'-"'6 ~low\~ ck ... ri'~ ~ro~ho\Nt 11--c.. fw-~~~ fu.r~c. ~,JeJ N"l~ 5~""p1c.S col7ec1-cJ q_..q-~J~
l& ~; r-r: ""+-0, 0"2.
TWN-18 10-16-2013 loo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
DescriptionofSamplingEvent: I 11'1""-&\U\.rtef" C.nloro~rM ~01:3
[ See instruction
Location (well name): I -=Fw>'j 'Zoe -rw l.\-2."2.
Sampler Name
and initials: I -r#-nth::r ffo IJ i(A,_., /111
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I I0/2.'! /~O'(j and Sampling (if different) ~--,;..M...;0~14.;....._ _______ _,
Well Purging Equip Used: [!!]pump or ~bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I Go.o1+/f.l li\Ov\.S
Purging Method Used: ~2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I &~-h:r b C"'\ot"'6.fb'rl""l Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event ~..l-rw __ Y_-_2._'-/ _____ ____.
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 '-l.O
Specific Conductance lo........;.~....;..~ ~f ____ _.1~-tMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): r.1 -i:I&f;ll)~,iiHoo~-~~ \ 13.5'D
Depth to Water Before Purging I §it"O \ •
b?.,bg
Casing Volume (V) 4'1 Well:l ~1 .'!;0 .... ,(.653h) 3>~.1~
3" Well:_ () _ (.367h)
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling event) I-I ~13_8 __ ......
Time I \'Z. '2.' I Gal. Purged I 6 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I 6383 I pH I 6 493 I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I 15. LU I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 2YZ I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I Q I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q) in gpm .
S/60= I ~
\~.0
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I l> I
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
VOCs
Nutrients
Heavy Metals
All Other Non Radiologies
Gross Alpha
Other (specify)
Cn 1or ,'Jc.
Final Depth ._I _._17.;....'..;..:11'-------'
Comment
01'\ 5-~h. ~~J
c.olle.d-.:: a
y N specified below) y N y
Gl D 3x40 ml D ~ HCL f)il
$ D 100 ml D In H2S04 129
D D 250 rnl D D HN03 D
D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D
D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D
00 D Sample volume D ~ D
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Sample Time \'ZZ/
See instruction
1'2..2.'31. ~fll'\cr 6Jla GM,.;n pas.cn~ -h Gol!ec+-Sa.Mple.s.
~+ 12'2.1, W"'tcr v.:x:c.~ Gko.,r-, t.~} ~itc ":t )2.Z~
TW4-22 10-29-2013 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
D
D
~
2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I ~ Q-A .,_<"fc.r GYI lorotorM 201,3
See instruction
Location (well name): ~...1 _-r_w_L.J:....-_Z....:'i~---------1
Sampler Name
and initials: 1--r;.fll'le.f Ho II ;J~~ )1f.}
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I IO/-z.~/2oiJ and Sampling (if different) NI'A '----~-------~
Well Purging Equip Used: (J[]pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I cOT\+;,IAOu..J
Purging Method Used: @]2 casings [QJ3 casings
I II.JL\-2-S
Sampling Event IQv.().ffc:r 6 Gh I orotc!l r M Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event '---------------'
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 4,1:>
Specific Conductance ~...1_1--'-~-'i ___ ____.l~-tMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): 11?...5 0
Depth to Water Before Purging I b~. 2 0 Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:' '30, '2.3 ,(.653h)
3" Well: i5 (.367h) '-------l
Weather Cond. I Ove.rca..si Ext' I Am b. Temp. oc (prior sampling event).__j1_3_0 __ _.
Time ll2 \&j I Gal. Purged I 0 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I ~o-z.q I pH I ~.8s I Conductance I I pHj I
Temp. °C I 15.11 I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I -z'!;O I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. °C I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 0 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I 1 ~.l'>
Time to evacuate two n ing volumes (2V)
T= 2V/Q =I 6 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ~.-I ...:A-=-W~A~L:::;._ ____ _..
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y
VOCs ijl D 3x40 ml D t¥1 HCL Ill
Nutrients Ill D 100 ml D Ill H2S04 m
Heavy Metals D D 250 ml D D HN03 D
All Other Non Radiologies D D 250m! D D No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D
Other (specify) Ill D Sample volume D I[) D
Cn\or~Jc. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I 731 2'1 Sample Time
See instruction
Comment
.llrril.lec\ 01"1 ~ ;}c "'+ J"Z IS 1 ~hfl-er"' o.ntl. cTa.rr1'1\ f~t1+ +., coil-ed-" s.t,..,pl-e.s .
5.di.mple~ toll-ec.+~~ o;,j--12"2.0. wo...ter ~ ~ Gko..f".
L ~ft .s ;.fc G\ -t )2'2.'-
TW4-24 10-29-2013 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
D
D
12!1
2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL See instruction
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I l.jTh Q "'t~.rf~,.. C.\-, 1 oro.f"on-¥1 2.013
Sampler Name
Location (well name): I :fw4-'2..5 and initials: l-r;!)l1t:Y" Hl) n;Jq'1/m
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging L-l __ \_0..;.../_1.--'"\"-/_:.2_0_.0=-----' and Sampling (if different) I N'(A
Well Purging Equip Used: [g]pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: [QJ2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event l Qv.c>-l+c:.r\~ C.n I OnrtonVJ Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event L....I _M_W_-_3_::2. _____ __,
pH Buffer 7.0 7.D pH Buffer 4.0 Y.O
Specific Conductance ll.....-'9:.__~:.....4:....._ __ _,~1 ~MHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): I \2,'-\. go
Depth to Water Before Purging I 5 Z. D {) Casing Volume (V) 4" Weii :I SO.l5 1(.653h)
3'' Well : o (.367h) L-------'
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. ·c {prior sampling eventlL-1 -'-)3_0
__ _..
Time 1 12.63 I Gal. Purged 10 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I "2 I :S.C{ I pH l 7.oq I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. °C I n;; .ss I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I -z..r;;~ I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) IZ5 I Turbidity (NTU) I J
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. °C I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 0 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q) in gpm.
S/60 = I 18'. 0
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two ca in-g volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 0 I
l o
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ._I ""'A;..;:\rJ_.A'-'-L ______ __.
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs !!I D 3x40 ml D BJ HCL ~ D
Nutrients !1J D 100m] D ijl H2S04 rn D
Heavy Metals D D 250m! D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologies D D 250m] D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) l'Sl 0 Sample volume 0 lSI D ~
Lh\o.-;Je If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth l 7C:. 4] Sample Time
See instruction
Comment
Arri>Je.J.. c11 .s:+~ ,.t-11.5'1. -r;..l'lt'IV"' .-t,.,J 6-"'rr,',.. pre's en J-+.. co/J~c.1-.SqJ11;oleJ .
.S~plc:.~ co/lech:J 01.~ }2.0 'i. INtA.+c:r \,.)c...s G \-e,o.r
Le.f-1-s it e. "'J , z 07
Cof\~;nuo~ ?vM?;~ Well
TW4-25 10-29-2013 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: YTh Giv..o.f4ei" c..\'llo-rbfortvl ZOI3
Location (well name): l._ii....;..._w_4_-_,_o __________ ___j
Field Sample ID IIW4-b()_II I9 ZOJ'3
Sampler Name
and initials:
See instruction
Date and Time for Purging 1-1 _n.;.;,./...:.t4_;,./_z_o_J:3 _____ __, and Sampling (if different) tJ/A ~~....;..._-------~
Well Purging Equip Used: Cf[]pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I 6-'(~"a+os
Purging Method Used: (![]2 casings (g]3 casings
Sampling Event I Q\AA(fcrb C.'nl or(;:::h>fiY'\ Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event I.___"T'_W_l.\_-_3_'1 _____ .....~
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0
Specific Conductance!._ _'1~~..;.."1 ____ _,1~-tMHOS/ em
Depth to Water Before Purging l.__o ___ _,
Weather Cond.
Time I llG!;~ I Gal. Purged I D
Conductance I o.s I pH I 6.41
Temp. °C I llf .o3 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I '3qs I
Turbidity (NTU) I \.~ I
Time I I Gal. Purged I
Conductance l I pH I
Temp. °C I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
I
I
I
I
pH Buffer 4.0 4.6
Well Depth(O.Olft): ._l __ o ___ ___J
Casing Volume (V) 4" Well :~_c __ -1,(.653h)
3" Well:_ 0 _(.367h)
Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling event)._l ""-IS_' __ _,
Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I -'
Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2 -Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 0 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate JQ) in gp m.
S/60 = I 0
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 0
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ._I ..:.A..:..\,J.:...;,.tfr..~.,l...=---------J
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs Ci§ D 3x40 ml D [] HCL I2J D
Nutrients ~ D 100 ml D 129 H2S04 rn D
Heavy Metals D D 250m! D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologies D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) l3J 0 Sample volume D ~ 0 I:E
Ghlor~~e If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth~~ _......;0::;.__ __ _. Sample Time 070b
See instruction
Comment
TW4-60 11-14-2013 lno not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I Y-rh Q"'l,\;1y..r N ;h .... =tc. zot3
, See instruction
Location (well name): .... 1-n_w_N--=---....::b::....b _________ __.
Sampler N arne
and initials: ff; ... ncr-J.t ol J:J'\j/"f7'J-
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I 10/li/ZOI-3 and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: ffi]pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: [QJ2 casings [QJ3 casings
r-=------r--.--...-T--....... ~-----1 'A-c:'Z. .... o 1 Sampling Event IQv.D;(f¢6 /\),:+;::~;(: Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event,_ _________ __.
pH Buffer 7.0 7,0 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance ._I _q'-'i--'11------'1 ~-tMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): ._I _0 ____ __,
Depth to Water Before Purging l.__o ___ __. Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:~-::i'J~---il(.653h)
3" Well:. 7) . (.367h)
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling eventJ'-'Il'-E._0 __ _,
Time I D~Y lf I Gal. Purged I 0 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I Lc, I pH I ~...3b I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. oc I lb.Y~ I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I Z~'! I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I t5 I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate lQ}, in gpm.
S/60 = I 0
Time to evacuate two ·a ·ing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q =I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 1-o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 0
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs '-1 J...A.:..\N;.....L.fo...;L;;;..._ ____ ___,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients llJ D 100 ml D ~ H2S04 2!1 D
Heavy Metals D D 250 ml D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologies D D 250 mJ D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) ill D Sample volume D l9 D ]ll
Gh lorl~( If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth ._I ----'0~---....1 Sample Time 08l-1.5
See instruction
Comment
TWN-60 10-17-2013 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2 ~..,..,,..,..,1Ls WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL See instruction
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: 11..\Th Qv.A.rrfc:r N ;fr.,.,foc. '2.6 D
Location (well name): ~....I_""T'"W __ /\J_-_&5 _________ ___,
Sampler Name
and initials: I =t".,.,-(11'1 t1 flo 1 J.'d\,..j/--1'»
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I l0/1,/2..013 and Sampling (if different) ~.-..:..,..;....;../"'::....:~....:......---------'
Well Purging Equip Used: [f[]pump or [Q] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I &< ~J"o ~
Purging Method Used: (1!]2 casings IQ]3 casings
I -t"w/'J-07 Sampling Event I Qv..l'..r h .. r~ /\5 ;h;;a:"< Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event L-------------l
pH Buffer 7.0 1.0 pH Buffer 4.0 I q,o
Specific Conductance ~.-1 _q....:..q____:~ ___ _..l ~-tMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft):
Depth to Water Before Purging I S.C.. Gf 0 Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:l ~C.. 321 I (.653h)
3" Well:_ 0 (.367h) ..___ ___ __,
Weather Cond. Ext' IAmb. Temp. oc (prior sampling event)L.l ....::,_0 __ _j
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I J
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHf I
Temp. oc I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 06-06-12 Rev. 7.2-Errata
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in b'J)m.
S/60 = 1..__1_\ __ ____.
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q=I "·'() I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 0
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs A'WAL
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml 0 D HCL D D
Nutrients ~ D IOOml 0 ~ H2S04 ~ D
Heavy Metals D D 250 ml 0 D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologies D D 250 ml 0 D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha 0 D 1,000 ml 0 D HN03 D D
Other (specify) cg 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0 ~
0 hj Of';J~ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I 71. '3S Sample Time 07Z7
See instruction
Comment
TWN-65 10-16-2013 IDa not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
TabC
Kriged Current Quarter Groundwater Contour Map, Capture Zone Map, Capture Zone Details Map, and
Weekly, Monthly and Quarterly Depth to Water Data
TIME WELL
1211 MW-1
951 MW-2
1304 MW-3
1303 MW-3A
935 MW-5
939 MW-11
933 MW-12
917 MW-14
917 MW-15
1308 MW-17
1209 MW-18
1152 MW-19
1226 MW-20
1153 MW-22
931 MW-23
1233 MW-24
942 MW-25
1240 MW-26
1230 MW-27
1236 MW-28
948 MW-29
944 MW-30
821 MW-31
819 MW-32
923 MW-33
920 MW-34
929 MW-35
927 MW-36
918 MW-37
Static
level
64.60
109.52
87.49
85.93
106.02
86.51
108.11
103.25
105.90
72.95
71.11
58.38
89.10
67.70
120.72
114.15
73.14
66.18
53.21
76.22
101.11
74.83
67.24
73.91
DRY
107.56
111.88
110.10
114.22
NAME: Garrin Palmer, Tanner Holliday, David Turk
DATE: 12/20/2013
TIME
1238
802
806
809
1226
812
801
805
808
811
813
815
731
735
737
1240
817
819
1225
1242
1229
1223
1224
759
1242
1221
757
739
732
742
746
748
734
749
743
WELL
MW-4
TW4-1
TW4-2
TW4-3
TW4-4
TW4-5
TW4-6
TW4-7
TW4-8
TW4-9
TW4-10
TW4-11
TW4-12
TW4-13
TW4-14
TW4-15
TW4-16
TW4-17
TW4-18
TW4-19
TW4-20
TW4-21
TW4-22
TW4-23
TW4-24
TW4-25
TW4-26
TW4-27
TW4-28
TW4-29
TW4-30
TW4-31
TW4-32
TW4-33
TW4-34
Static
Level
69.10
64.66
65.45
51.85
70.16
60.18
68.93
65.27
64.84
57.86
58.02
57.99
42.11
46.48
84.58
66.18
61.85
73 .91
61.57
66.84
70.09
61.90
59.07
64.41
60.98
83 .91
62.71
80.80
36.75
71.61
77.00
82.77
48.10
70.11
69.20
TIME
1156
1150
1146
755
752
1227
1134
1139
1144
NA
1205
1214
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1157
NA
1201
NA
1141
1012
WELL
PIEZ-1
PIEZ-2
PIEZ-3
PIEZ-4
PIEZ-5
TWN-1
TWN-2
TWN-3
TWN-4
TWN-5
TWN-6
TWN-7
TWN-8
TWN-9
TWN-10
TWN-11
TWN-12
TWN-13
TWN-14
TWN-15
TWN-16
TWN-17
TWN-18
TWN-19
Static
Level
63.16
33.51
44.93
50.35
47.68
57.75
32.01
36.90
49.95
Abandon
76.79
87.03
Abandon
Abandon
Abandon
Abandon
Abandon
Abandon
62.31
Abandon
47.71
Abandon
59.19
52.90
Some time may be the same because we split up to take measurments.
TIME WELL Static Level
NA DR-1 Abandon
NA DR-2 Abandon
1246 DR-S 83.05
1248 DR-6 94.35
925 DR-7 91.86
1240 DR-8 51.11
1237 DR-9 86.47
1234 DR-10 78.15
1256 DR-11 98.25
1258 DR-12 89.90
1301 DR-13 69.79
1221 DR-14 76.33
1230 DR-15 92.91
NA DR-16 Abandon
1217 DR-17 64.97
NA DR-18 Abandon
1212 DR-19 63.00
1214 DR-20 55.50
1157 DR-21 101.29
1209 DR-22 DRY
1200 DR-23 70.62
1206 DR-24 43.80
NA DR-25 Abandon
I
Weekly Inspection Form
Date ,of-, /-z.ct3 Name ~,-,(\e.r ~oii :J~{ 1 &c..rr;,., Pc.IMcr
System Operational (If no note
Ti .... !!!! WIJ e D h* e_pt c omments bl I • ' an!l ero ems corrective aottons}
!'-101 MW-4 G,K80 Flow ~3 eYes )No
Meter z:o7f3LJ,Z.S ~No
~
r3:>5& MW-26 bz .L\.5 Flow 100 ( Ye~No
~ Meter 3k.'1 lt71. o-z.., (Yes~o
)~'SO TW4-19 b~·g4 Flow ~ Y. o QesJ No
Meter 16.0\2 so.oc; ~No
f-.
t'3S3 TW4-20 g ,_qo Flow ~ '{8' (Yes )'.Jo
Meter S cr3o~l.\ .'--17 '-.Ye§)No -1'-\D~ TW4-4 16 l\ Flow g.o (Yes\ No
Meter let z. I IS~ .7
/ ( Ye~ No -
1'3~'3 TWN-2 bO.O\ Flow jg.S (_~yJo
Meter r::,'1'i 1~. b (Yes>o
1350 TW4-22 !;g.DD Flow .\~:z.. (Ye§\ No
Meter bq fa 9 2.1 ~ ~Y~No
~ "' \]~7 TW4-24 75.C..I Flow I~.'?.. (-~0
Meter <"=.lt1~Dg.L., ( Ye.s) No
l J. '10 TW4-25 64,5D Flow 18~ (Yes }Jo
Meter '4o'Z.rl6 ~ (Yes)No -
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ---------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
( Date Name 06("r.' ..... PD..\c:"'e,r. (c td'zec
System Operational (If no note
Tl me Wll e 0 h* ept c omments anv oroblems/corrective actions}
I z. "4 l{ MW-4 G7. 71 Flow ~-4 6-1' -"'1 (Yes)-No
Meter 2tZ7'Z.~ .g~ ~s'> No
IZ'-10 MW-26 64.'l7 Flow I o. '-{ &PA ~ No
Met.er 3Uo6¥ z. 7 (Vel· No -
ll4l TW4-19 6().7'1 Flow 1'-t.o &~.M.. @ No
Meter 1632"475.65 <Ye~ No
l't.37 TW4-20 /J'1..13 Flow £1. 6 6-P..v\ {YeS\ No
Meter .5Ci~ s :1."1. ~C> (Yes)No
IZt.H TW4-4 6'7.(0 Flow 7.'-\ &P.M. -?Ye~ No
Meter 1'16bOZ:.~k (YeS) No ......____
12..25 -'---= . TWN-2 2/,'30 Flow IS .b GPJ>A-~No
Meter ~~~ -z,t,.g, -ro (Ye?f No
12.33_ TW4-22 58.05 Flow \i( o trP..M-eYe~ No
Meter 11~04 (Z (Yes".>io
1230 TW4-24 bb. 3ct Flow \K.o 6 f_,4A-~No
Meter I, 3 8 2 q 7 -\0 ~s""j No
IZ.ZO TW4-25 155.60 Flow IB.L\ GP.fA... eYe$) No
Meter 4 118'78'. 70 ~No ----
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ----------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
(
Weekly Inspection Form
Date 10 1 z.3 k~
System Operational (If no note r· 1me wn e D h* e__gt c omments an31: QYO bl I ctfv ' ) ems corre e actions
I 4 46 MW-4 sg.zo Flow y .J &P..,.v\. ~No
Meter 21C\16t.'Z7 (!_ej} No
l_l:f.3_£j MW-26 87.16 Flow JO. o 6-P.-v\. d"e]) No
Meter 368...C78,67 ~'\ No
I 5o~ TW4-19 6o. zb Flow I 4.0 6-P.M (Yes_) No
Meter r67Z777.~o C(e§) No
1'135 TW4-20 65.3o Flow ID. \ GP.I-A. ~S)No
Meter 5q6 t.( ID. Z3 (Y~ No
I 1.-{,.SO TW4-4 18. 7f Flow 7-Z. 6-PrA-{Yej No
Meter Z.DZ6«Z. go (Ye§) No
14 21.{ TWN-2 Z$;.6Z.. Flow ]$; I &(JM (Y~ No
Meter 1'-\jO~'f 60 ((e~ No
I y32. TW4-22 .5'ct .3Cj Flow /f. z.. GPA ?(~No
Meter ll.(oso. 6o (Ye§} No
I I.J'ZJ! TW4-24 66-6"0 Flow I g,o GPM. ~No
Meter 662'2.1f?.Z0 (Yew No
I Y2o TW4-25 .5g ,5i Flow I X" .o G P/V\ ~ No
Meter 4z~on. L1o ~ No
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): --------------------------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Monthly Depth Check Form
Date !O /2. '-\I 2.D 1.3 Name --r;; ne• Ho} I ;J:j f Crc-r r ;" PC\.l!NVU
Time Well Depth* Time Well Depth*
tOO ] MW-4 ~r:s.gs O'l3'1 TWN-1 sc. 91
\00~ TW4-1 k,'-1·1.:; or.r~o TWN-2 31..\ I/
IDIO TW4-2 ~5 .'7'1 OCJifq TWN-3 3{;..70
1011 TW4-3 5'2. .I 0 Ot\'1b TWN-4 Yct.I.S
101i TW4-4 G/i.Cfl( 0'1~ TWN-7 87.'10
10l.l TW4-5 f.().Df. CitLJ~ TWN-18 ~g.7/
100'1 TW4-6 b't .3 -z oq52. MW-27 sz.~o
)00~ TW4-7 t.S .I ,S tOOD MW-30 75.21
1017.. TW4-8 bS.l( JDDY MW-31 ?,7.51
\O l'l TW4-9 57.75 0'1."3~ TW4-28 3/.D~
lOtS TW4-10 Sl.91 0~'-11 TW4-29 -rz...to
1014 TW4-11 S~tO oqSI TW4-30 -n. '5
D((~S TW4-12 '-\ L.. ')...., o"lS.'> TW4-31 ~). S1
OG\'11 TW4-13 L\i.S~ oq~Cf -tw~-3).. '-(~."Z.O
Cl'\~ TW4-14 ~S.l\ C>'\SS 1\Jl.\-33 70.50
100~ TW4-15 «o3,b4 0 'IY1 -rwtf-3'i f,'f.IO
}ODb TW4-16 bl.52
l 01 ~. ' TW4-17 ~~ 8b
013C. TW4-18 b I. b.j
\Otl(,. TW4-19 b~.{;;f{
lot(, TW4-20 G,Z, bLf
ol:\<.)'\ TW4-21 {.0 .'11..
IDI~ TW4-22 SfS, 15
lOc"Z. TW4-23 f,L\,t,':,
!Ql\ TW4-24 IS .~~
Oj32-TW4-25 S'3:.. 'S
C>g5!~ TW4-26 ~;3..00
0"\L!S TW4-27 8/.'Z'j
Comments: (Please note the well number for any comments)
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet
Weekly Inspection Form
Date lp lu/,3
Svstem Ocerational (If no note
Time Well De nth* Comments anv problems/corrective actions)
_lo 1\ MW-4 73.17 Flow 4."( 6P.N". (Ye§) No
Meter z. z3TZ.. '3 • Yo {fa~ No
IVD7 MW-26 6'3.6l Flow I cJ . '1 6 P.,4A.. @]No
Met.er 36~7 28'.54 (Ye~ No
I o.z._6 TW4-19 2'1 ,L-ID Flow I Y.O() (YeS) No
Meter J6't4l..3K.oe:.J ;r9§) No
loo4 TW4-20 ,(2..51 Flow 10 .o h-P.M.. {Yes) No
Meter 5'17YD5"97 ~No
\o 1 4 TW4-4 7Cf. '18' Flow l·.5 (:, p ,/-"\.. (vev No
Meter Z-05~80. fO ~No
{)q'-10. I TWN-2 Zl,.So Flow I K .0 U./'--deS) No
Meter l 1..\60 4 7. '23 ~s)No
()'15'1 TW4-22 51."7'l Flow HL~o.\ &P.I"'\.. ~No
Meter 153'1,. 70_ (Ves No
O_qSS TW4-24 £6. L{" Flow I fL I &P /"\ (Yej) No
Meter 1.1 '-t'1D9 ~ oo (Yes) No -
CJ CJ 45 TW4-25 52.77 Flow I,. £l &~.J.A.... C{e~No
Meter ~32171. go (YeS) No
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ---------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
(
System Operational (If no note
Time Well Depth* Comments anv nroblems/corrective actions}
13.5\ MW-4 6'l.<t( Flow 4.1.\ (,. p"""" (Yes~o
Meter zz.ql ~o.38 ~Yes)No
134&-MW-26 {3. 3'-t Flow IO.I 6P./""\ (j__es) No
Met.er 3'7166&.gl .. ~No
........
1'--1 IS TW4-19 61. ~6 Flow I '-I . o 6-1' .-M. CYes) No
Meter " l 7 26'"> b ::r. Q::: C{es)No
LJ~5 TW4-20 62-65 Flow q,9 ('rf~ (~ No
Meter s 'i gq z.o -1.5' ~No
llS5 TW4-4 6'1.10 Flow ~. l &fl.,.,.. tfes) No
Meter 'Z.1 o'-'·zt;. fO C(e~ No
f.:U.S TWN-2 .Z.I.oZ. Flow tfLS &PA CiJW No
Meter 1'-t~SI/, '-10 (Ye~ No
It 4t.. TW4-22 .57.t1¥ Flow IS'· z. G-PY\. (YeS'} No
Meter 7/3/l 30 (Yes) No
12.3<1 TW4-24 6£_2' Flow J7.Cf 6-PA (f_e_~ No
Meter 6q39D.5. zo (res) No -
1330 TW4-25 6'L21 Flow 1g. o 6-P..M-(Yesj No
Meter •··P-t2.Lt3L 3o 6e1> No
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ---------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
( Date 11 J11 t,3
System Operational (If no note
1me W II e D er>th * c omments an:l£ (!roblems/corrective actions}
\OOC) MW-4 6ct ~ z.~ Flow 4.'J C-f'M -~No
Meter Z.344DI ~ Z5 {YeS) No -
D'l57 MW-26 {3~8.5 Flow Ia .3 6-PA {Yesj No
Met.er '373565 17 eYe~ No
t120 TW4-19 60.yg-Flow I t--1,0 &P./A ~No
Meter I 7.5 7 '2.$0 rn {res) No
O'f54 TW4-20 ~?.30 Flow G). 9 G~,v... (Ye$) No
Meter 600S.5Z.~z_ C1e$J No
106 '"{ TW4-4 6'1~-z.. Flow !f.o Grf _I.A.. tf_e]) No
Meter '21506g, 40 ~No
{ D'U8 TWN-2 2"7 ~n Flow I S . 8' _G-P-""' Cf_e~ No
Meter 1.53.63~ 2.0 ({e~ No
O'l5o TW4-22 .5fL6D Flow I~ .o r .... PJ.A-tV~~ No
Meter l Gl_i_''~j~ YD_ (Ye~ No
_D_Cj"(6_ TW4-24 {3, 72_ Flow \ 8 .o &P.,...... (Ye~ No
Meter 71L{I~'2 -~ &§J No
D'l14 TW4-25 II. SO Flow i~.'-\ &P~ 6lesJ No
Meter 'i5Z.372. 3'0 {fe~ No
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ---------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
(
(
Date i I ) 2.1 j z.o 1.::)
Weekly Inspection Form
Name -r:_,,.,~,.. HoJI ,·J~
Time Well Deoth* Comments
nof. MW-4 Gtt "13 Flow i..l 3
Meter Z'-122 gq. Lt5
13o2. MW-26 Flow ,o.y
1·~ TW4-19 (.2.5~ Flow l"t.C
Meter I Be let l$.o7
lZ.S~ TW4-20 b~.4z. Flow 10.0
Meter 602.'-1'-b.ZZ
1~11 TW4-4 7Lo3 Flow ~ D
Meter 2'Z.lbLI7.o
t2.4'-TWN-2 34.o1 Flow l~.b
Meter ,.sgCJII. o
TW4-22 Flow t~ o
Meter ~lt:t71.5
I Z . .5'2. TW4-24 f,3:11 Flow rg'.o
1"2. '11 TW4-25 /O.Ob Flow 18.Y
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
System Operational (If no note
any problems/corrective actions\
QeS)No
-
~No
(Ye~ No
( Ye~ No
(Y~)No
(Yes) No
C'@S) No
CveS) No
(Y~No
-eYe'S) No
cY9s) No
~s)No
CYe_§ No -
(Yes) No
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ---------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
( Date ,, fzs/,3
System Operational (If no note
1me Wll e D th* 91)1 c t ommen s bl I ti f ) an~ ~ro ems correc ve ac 1ons
I ~L[(" MW-4 {p'f.s) Flow l.f,l/ t:A~ (Y~ No ., cr~ Meter ;l.4S"H~ .1/ No
1-;u 1 MW-26 ?2:~8'-Flow /0.~ "'"· ~s No
oJ eve} No Met.er ~-:r:;03 z ""'i
14()/ TW4-19 (of."}-'if Flow ILl. 0 ~OuA. (res. No
Meter ,!~~t~~~o~ (Yes 'No
1~1q TW4-20 (pf,'jj) Flow I ~ ~-... JD.1""' ~ No
Meter l.,o~-2, 33 :1D
I' (Ye)) No
I 3 'If" TW4-4 ~Cf.t\.; Flow 'ff",o a.o-. ~No
Meter
...,, (Y~ No "J-.1.!1-<. "'iii . 1.{ 0
1.328" TWN-2 -.2 7. Zl Flow 1 s.5 &P.,.cA (Yes\No
Meter t61151. zo (Ye~ No
133~ TW4-22 s-9.n--Flow lt1/ r . .# .. ~ <Yes> No
Meter
..,. ~No ~J..DloD,foD
1333 TW4-24 I L .l:J Flow I~ .0 &PJ.A {Yes) No
Meter 7 S5S"Yb_."'] (Yes')No
1323 TW4-25 6'1.10 Flow j 9>. 7 6-f;V\. ~No
Meter 41Zo2.2. 70 6'e8) No
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ---------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Date il/z_o,j?,o\3
Monthly Depth Check Form
Name -<nl\(..r ».II:J<\.r
Time Well Depth* Time Well Depth*
QI..S'S MW-4 b4 .iS ~bo~ TWN-1 .X.-iS
~ o(,!.c( TW4-1 (.j .OO QCol1 TWN-2 :!.~.15
~bs.:!> TW4-2 b!..'li Qb:§J TWN-3 3b 70
~~0_5,. TW4-3 Sl "'S Qk-'Z.'i TWN-4 L..j4 13
C>IO] TW4-4 10.0\ O"~j TWN-7 87."\1
O~Dl TW4-5 c;o.•HS' 0~'4'0 TWN-18 S.8. 7.&
070j TW4-6 £'!,53 Qt.30 MW-27 S'2..77
C>G..':.-{ TW4-7 'S.b.C. Ofsl) MW-30 7f;.,Z.C>
()701 TW4-8 f,S,Z.4 otn MW-31 b7· ,:SCl
6B!.}' TW4-9 .S~.Oj QIH{ TW4-28 3k>.q7
o1.S.~ TW4-10 ~~:lzs 0"135 TW4-29 1Z.!JJ
ObSD TW4-11 S'6',:3j o7~fS TW4-30 -n.,-,
Oil ~ TW4-12 112.32 07'10 TW4-31 fS3. 7..5
07'Z..'"l TW4-13 '17.1~ 07'-l IW '-\ -~'Z.. '1~.31
"IW'-1 .. ~~ .o~'-z:.c:. TW4-14 5.~ .Cfj 013:=:, -zo.s~
C>(:."\1 TW4-15 b3 ,q~ o1'3.t..
.,......, '-\ .. ~ \.j
h'l ,151
C17S'i TW4-16 61 g~
0750 TW4-17 I:!>.~S
C>b03 TW4-18 (,).11
03JO TW4-19 b~.lS
()b"\~ TW4-20 ..58 .03
bt.IO TW4-21 61. 'i I
o(,'\Z.. TW4-22 62. 73,
0107 TW4-23 b~. &'.S
Sl(;~O TW4-24 ~ G~.~B
Obl::l TW4-25 S1.'fj
Cl i bC. TW4-26 (;;3)3
0710 TW4-27 [1,1.08
Comments: (Please note the well number for any comments)
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet
Weekly Inspection Form
Date Name (
System Operational (If no note
Time We] Depth* Comments anllJ:!roblems/corrective actions)
i JJ G MW-4 _6_~ z_q Flow 4.'-\ b-PAA (i~ No
Meter '250611.5'-t ~S.) No
1315 MW-26 63. 'lO Flow \0.0 &PM tfes) No
Met.er 3lS6DCl,5~ ~No
151>" TW4-19 6q. '-f':f_ Flow I '-t .Oo (Yes )No
Meter \8S:oc 6-.:. . "iu (Ye?) No
13iZ TW4-20 7Z.Il5 Flow 9~1 &_PA cJes) No
Meter 6o L.lgll~.6o (fe~ No
. IJ 2.3' TW4-4 6'1.66 Flow $5 " 6-r.M ?fes)No
Meter Z. Z8't~~. '-to ~No
( \"l.3'2.. TWN-2 '2..6 70 Flow lg 6 ~P#\ {YeS' No
cf{e~ Meter I b~Ot.!ll ~D No
170'( TW4-22 s~ ~~-. Flow IS.O GPI"\ {Ye~ No
Meter B4o€.0 . So {feS) No _,
1305 TW4-24 '71. 20 Flow 1-L L.l 6-P,..v\ (Yes') No
Meter 115631. '-'0 eYes No
122.._1\ TW4-25 fi(J .DO Flow j(_g &r...v\.. «e§) No
Meter Ligz. 7 35 ._'\0 ~.No
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ---------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
\
\
Date ~~~ "1/zo 13
Tl me W II e D th* ep1
1'32.0 MW-4 C.~.cl ~
1317 MW-26 (:.l{.~O
~ TW4-19 "8-1~
l'31S TW4-20 7Z. B_j
I'~L'> TW4-4 (/i.~3
l'30S TWN-2 z.'-..60
131C TW4-22 5~.:.10
\~0'1 TW4-24 '10.03
\3C( TW4-25 61.60
Weekly Inspection Form
Name ~r y,,);)'\3
System Operational (If no note c t ommen s bl I ti tl ) anl! ero ems correc ve ac ons
Flow 4.3 eYes )'Jo
Meter -z..sc.o 81· 2.3 C'Yes)No
Flow 10'~ CYesJ No
Met.er "3$0C:: 1~.~ (YeS) No
Flow )LLO C:Yes) No
Meter l'Z7CJ'3 L\1. o7 CYe~ No
. .......,
Flow !D.O (Ye~ No
Meter 60bZ.6.7 gg ~No -
Flow 1,'-4 (YeS) No
Meter 2.33..5>~1.4 _Cvev No
Flow 15.0 eYes) No
Meter \6~1 £S,q (ves.-,\No
-
Flow 16:5 ~vevNo
Meter "!;f> 711:> :o C:Yes~o
Flow ~ 16.9 c_Yei)No
Meter 7~ (, \~Z., g ('Yes) No
Flow \(.0 (YesJNo
Meter 49Z780 .D Q'e:W No
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): --------------
" Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
( Date ,zjl(:,/z..6D Name ~v-n"v-1-}PJ/,)j
Svstem Ooerational (If no note
Time Well Deoth* Comments anv problems/corrective actionsj
JL{{O MW-4 b'L03 Flow 4,3 ~)No
Meter Z.G.J3S l.z. \ c:Yes) No
)~Ob MW-26 ""' .'1~ Flow ~IO·Z c-v-es)No
Met.er 3524S""I, ~.3 ( Yes~o
1~2.1 TW4-19 G:.7.1S Flow 11-J.D ~Y~No
Meter l'iO (, 7 4 0. OY (YeS) No
~
lil>3 TW4-20 "71 .~~ Flow 10.0 (Yes ~o
Meter f:,077 '-lo 70 cYes~No
1~13 TW4-4 b~.1~ Flow /,g -, ....._ C Yes l')o
Meter z:>~ \ ~'1· b (Yes )No -
l"':l55 TWN-2 31.), DES Flow \g.o CYes)No
Meter nz.so~. g ( Ye$! No
J!.jOO TW4-22 S1,~1 Flow 1&.'~ c Y~No
Meter ~$797.3 C__ve§:)No
1]57 TW4-24 6L1,17 Flow 17. '1 ~YeS) No
Meter ~162Db. \ C YeuNo
J).SD TW4-25 63.1 Flow 11."3> ~s_) No
Meter ~oz..GHD Cvesj No
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ---------------
(
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
Date rz./z3 /2DI3 Name ...,-;;::.,f)(:(" ~" 11.'J.j
System Operational (If no note
T' 1me W II e 0 th"' .eP' c t ommen s bl I i i ) an)£ ero ems correct ve_ act ons
IY3'1 MW-4 b'f.8S Flow Y.3 C Yes)No
Meter 7...b'7 ~b. 70 (_ ve~~No
....
142.q MW-26 6 7.:3'S Flow 10 ~ C~No
Met.er 38'L..j~8lS'.~o ( Yes )\Jo
1 G'5l' TW4-19 £Y). lrJ Flow lY .O (Yes)No
l~.SO Meter ·,9 ·:nss'i .0-t, (Yes __:No
\111.::, TW4-20 /Z.Y'i Flow lD 0 l(Eis ~o
Meter 60c.tz_2g .f.b C Yes ) No
~~ TW4-4 6q.qs Flow 1.~ C-ygs "No
''n'1 Meter '2..'-\~1'1\.7 (Yes) No --
( \Lil'l TWN-2 3'l.. 0 'i Flow~ 1~.0 ~s~o
Meter \76.300.2 LVeS\ No
\~lD TW4-22 e:,O.oo Flow 1~.5 ("Y~s)No
Meter lf6.h$0 ,1 (Yes)No -
IL.\ 11 TW4-24 "Lt' 7.3 Flow ~ \1.~ /Y_es'f'Jo
Meter ~37~gq,9 >< X c._ nJS )No
I~DB TW4-25 b~.C>l Flow \7,.5 (Yes)No
Meter SOb.'\59.3 C_VeS)No -
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ---------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
40G/1U
Weekly Inspection Form
System Operational (If no note
T' tme W II e D h* ept c omments bl I . . ) anl£1!ro ems correct ave .actaons
12'-17 MW-4 /,9_5o Flow S.3 6-PA (19~ No
Meter 27Z'i3z.sg eYe~ No
IZ_51 MW-26 A5 31? Flow I 0. t1 &¥.).A. (YeS) No
Met.er 386531.50 (Ye~ No -
1350 TW4-19 /(7 gy-Flow 14 .a ~P.I-A. C[eS) No
Meter 'q~?L{2.~8'-~ ~JNo
j3DD TW4-20 7'i 5.3 Flow I~-o 6-i='...N\. ~No
Meter .<IO~Dl 51 <Ye5J No
IZ4"\ TW4-4 t(q .'io Flow ~LD 6-j:>~ Ciii?) No
Meter 2"i S'06'i. zo <Y_eS) No
( L3l0 TWN-2 31. 7L.{ Flow 13.3 G?~ (Yes) No
Meter I tgo6DS. 10 (Ye~ No
1~5 TW4-22 5'Lh Flow lll. 0 6-P ..-v\.. Cfes) No
Meter t.i27'i.5-70 ~No
11DQ TW4-24 go.o Flow I~ 0 &PA (Yes\ No
Meter f6oi.OA. 11"1 • 10 C(e~No
13zS TW4-25 AO 7R Flow I 8'.~ 6-P./V\. {YeS\ No
Meter .c; jq£:)'17 7[) (Yes) No
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ---------------
(
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
@ estimated dry area
MW-5 perched monitoring well showing e sso3 elevation in feet amsl
TW4·22 temporary perched monitoring well
0 5582 showing elevation in feet amsl
lWN-7 h d . .t . .A5562 temporary perc e nitrate mom onng
V well showing elevation in feet amsl
PIEZ-1 perched piezometer showing
Q 5592 elevation in feet amsl
TW4-32 temporary perched monitoring well
~ 5564 installed September, 2013 showing
approximate elevation in feet amsl
RUIN SPRING & 5380 seep or spring showing
elevation in feet amsl
NOTE: MW-4, ~W-26. TW4-4. TW4-19. and 1W4-20 are chlorolorm
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
KRIGED 4th QUARTER, 2013 WATER LEVELS
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE REFERENCE FI<!YRE c -1 H :/718000/feb14/Uwl1213.srf
'
,. ,, estimated nitrate capture
zone boundary stream tubes
resulting from pumping
estimated chloroform capture
zone boundary stream tubes
resulting from pumping
@ estimated dry area
MW-5 perched monitoring well showing e 5503 elevation in feet amsl
rw0
4-12 temporary perched monitoring well
5582 showing elevation in feet amsl
TW~ hed " .. <>5562 temporary perc mtrate monltonng
well showing elevation in feet amsl
PIE2·1 perched piezometer showing
Q 5592 elevation in feet amsl
TW4-32 temporary perched monitoring well 3::t 5564 installed September, 2013 showing
approximate elevation in feet amsl
RUIN SPRING
~ 5380 seep or spring showing
elevation in feet amsl
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC. APPROVED
~Oil~ ~11
KRIGED 4th QUARTER, 2013 WATER LEVELS
AND ESTIMATED CAPTURE ZONES
WHITE MESA SITE
DATE REFERENCE H:/718000/feb14/
nitrate/Uwl1213cz2nt.srf
FIGURE
C-2
.,. ..
estimated nitrate capture
zone boundary stream tubes
resulting from pumping
," " I
I
MW-4
e sss3
TW4-1
0 5554
PIEZ-2
Q 5595
TW4-32
~S564
estimated chloroform capture
zone boundary stream tubes
resulting from pumping
perched monitoring well showing
elevation in feet amsl
temporary perched monitoring well
showing elevation in feet amsl
perched piezometer showing
elevation in feet amsl
temporary perched monitoring well
installed September, 2013 showing
elevation in feet amsl
554()
5535
ss3o
NOTE: MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19, and TW4-20 are chloroform pumping wells;
TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 are nitrate pumping wells
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM, INC.
KRIGED 4th QUARTER, 2013 WATER LEVELS
AND ESTIMATED CAPTURE ZONES
WHITE MESA SITE
DATE
nitrate/U1213cznt.srf
TabD
Kriged Previous Quarter Groundwater Contour Map
@ estimated dry area
MW-5 perched monitoring well showing e 5503 elevation in feet amsl
rw0
4·12 temporary perched monitoring well
5582 showing elevation in feet amsl
TWN-7 h d . . . A.5562 temporary perc e mtrate momtonng
V well showing elevation in feet amsl
PIEZ-1 perched piezometer showing
tiil 5593 elevation in feet amsl
TW4-32 temporary perched m01.1itqrlng well
~ 5564 installed September. 2013 showing
approximate elevation in feet amsl
RUIN SPRING b 5380 seep or spring showing
elevation in feet amsl
NOTE: MW-4. MW-26; TW44. TW4-19, and TW4-20 are ch1oroform
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
KRIGED 3rd QUARTER, 2013 WATER LEVELS
WHITE MESA SITE
"Pi'ROVEll DATE REFERENCE FIGURE
H:/718000/nov13/Uwl0913.srf I D-1
TabE
Hydrographs of Groundwater Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
-....! 0
0
0> 0 0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
(]1
0
0
•
~
~
•
~ 9
0
(,.)
0
0
I
1\)
0 0
'
0 0
I
0 0
.
06/01/08
12/18/08
07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/11
04/01/12
10/18/12
05/06/13
11/22/13
06/10/14
-4 :e z I ......
~ -C'D ""'':
r C'D < !.
0 < C'D ""'':
::t 3
C'D -= .
2:
3
"C -
w 01 0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
w 0 0
1\) 01 0
/ v
•
--
1\)
9 0
.....
01 0
T
)
~~
N
~ v
I
t
r" /
-· ·---~ --
.....
0 0
-
01 0 0 0 .
"
.
.
.
---
06/01/08
12/18/08
07/06/09
01/22/10 -t :e z I N
08/10/10 :e D) -(1)
""'l
r-(1) 02/26/11 < !.
0 < (1)
""'l 09/14/11 ::!
3 (1) -:= 04/01/12 2:
3
"'C -
10/18/12
05/06/13
11/22/13
06/10/14
~
0
w 01 0
.I
I
~
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
w 0 0
1\)
01 0
1\) 0 0
....
01 0
_.
9 0
I •
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
I
01 0 0 0
06/01/08
. 12/18/08
07/06/09
01/22/10
~ z I CN
08/10/10 ~ -CD ""' ....
02/26/11 CD < !!..
0 < CD ""' 09/14/11 ::!
3
' CD -. := 04/01/12 C" -3
"C --10/18/12
05/06/13
-11/22/13
-06/10/14
-a.
E -.c
I ---C1)
E
i= ....
Cl) > 0
'ii > C1)
..J ....
C1) -ca 3:
-.::r I z ~
v~I0~/90
8~/90/90
G~/8~/0~
G~H0/170
~ ~~v~t6o
~ ~/9G/G0
0~/0~/80
0~/GG/~0
60!90/LO
80/8~/G~
80/W/90
..
-
0 0 0 0 ,....
0 0 C\1
' 0 0 (t)
ll
1
~
1
~\
~
0 0 "<t
0 0 Ll)
0 0 CD
v~/0~/90 ..-----.--------r----~------.----..-------,
8~/90/90
-G~/B~/0~ c. E -.c = -Q) G~H0/170
E ;:: ....
Q) > 0 ~ ~/v ~/60
Cii > Q)
...J .... Q) ~ ~/9G/G0 -as 3:
(0
I z ~ 0~/0~/BO
0~/GG/~0
60/90/LO
BO/B ~/G ~ +----+-----l------+------+----f----------1
CD !l>
0
....
CD 0'>
0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
~ 0
CD 1\)
0
I
CD 0 0
\
1
\
)
4(
\
t
~
CXl CXl 0
~\
~
~
CXl 0'> 0
.
-
--~ ------~
12/18/08
07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10 ~ z I .......
~
02/26/11 -(D
""'l
r (D < ~
09/14/11 0 < (I)
""'l
::!
3
04/01/12 (I) -~
2:
3
'tJ 10/18/12 -
05/06/13
11/22/13
06/10/14
0> w a,
0> w ~
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
0> w
i\l
0> w
0
~ 0>
..__ ---.
~~
0> 1\)
"'
0> 1\)
~
0> 1\)
i\l
~~
~ • (
~ \
~ 0
""'-.
0> ......
0>
'
I ~ ~ ....--
0> _.
a,
07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
~
02/26/11 z I ......
~ :e m -(1)
""" . 09/14/11 r-(1) < !!!..
0 < (1) . 04/01/12 """ ::!
3
(1) -:=
. 10/18/12 2:
3
"C -
05/06/13
11/22/13
06/10/14
p ~10 ~/90 .-----..-----..,...-----...-----,---------,
£~/90/90
-a. E -c: ~/8 ~/0 ~ .c
..: --Q)
E i= C:~/W/PO a.. Q) > 0
a; > Q)
..J ~ ~/P~/60 ·
a..
Q) -ca 3:
(D ,...
I ~ ~/9C:/C:O z ~
0~/0~/80
60/90/LO -1------+-----+------l-------l---------l
-0.
E :a . ---Q)
E ;::
~
Q) > 0
Gi > Q)
..J
~ Q) -m 3:
co
~ I z ~
v~!0~/90
£~/90/SO
~~/B~/0~
~~/W/vO
~ ~/v ~/60
~ ~/9~/~0
0~/0~/BO
0~1~~/W
60/90/LO
-
0 0 0 0 ,....
0 0 C\1
0
0 (")
r
~
~
~
~ ~~
+::::: r----_
1---..
0
0 "<t
~
.c: v
1-----.
0 0 10
(.}1
(.}1
Ot ~ 0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
(.}1 ~
Ot
(.}1 ~
0
(.}1 c:.u Ot
(.}1 c:.u 0
(.}1
1\)
Ot
(.}1
1\)
0
1-----+----l----1----+----f-----t----t-07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/11
. 04/01/12
10/18/12
-05/06/13
11/22/13
I 06/10/14
~ z I .....
CD
~ -C'D ""'1: .... C'D [
0 < C'D ""'1:
::1
3 C'D -:=
2:
3
"C -
..-. a.
E -.c . ... ,..... -Cl)
E ·-1-... Cl) > 0 -Cl) > Cl)
..J ...
Cl) ... ~
0 (W)
I 3:
~
v ~/Lc/c ~ -·.------.--------.------,------,------.--------,
£ ~~v~/80
c~/W/vO
0~/8~H ~ •
60/90/LO -
80/cc/cO ~
90/0 ~/0~
90/8c/90 +-----+------+-----+------1------4-------l
0
lO ,.....
0
o:i ,.....
0 0 <X)
-c.
E -.c . .... .... -CD
E ·-1-
llooo CD > 0 -CD > CD ...J
llooo
CD .... ca ~ ,..
M I ~ :=
v~/Lc/U
£ ~~v~/80
G~/W/vO
0~/8~/~~
60/90/LO
80/GG/GO
90/0~/0~
S0/8c/SO
-
-
-
0
<ci co
;
~
\
~
~
0 a:i co
f
~
)
.~
0 0 I'-
~l.-----L---
~
l.-----1---
0 a:i I'-
C!
0 co
TabF
Depths to Groundwater and Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -1
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitorin~ (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,646.96 5,648.09 1.13 112.5
5,600.38 02/06/09 47.71 46.58
5,599.99 07/21/09 48.10 46.97
5,600.26 09121109 47.83 46.70
5,601.10 10/28/09 46.99 45.86
5,602.59 12/14/09 45.50 44.37
5,600.55 03/11/10 47.54 46.41
5,600.66 05/11/10 47.43 46.30
5,599.18 09/29/10 48.91 47.78
5,598.92 12/21/10 49.17 48.04
5,598.29 02/28/11 49.80 48.67
5,597.80 06/21/11 50.29 49.16
5,597.32 09/20/11 50.77 49.64
5,597.15 12/21/11 50.94 49.81
5,596.54 03/27/12 51.55 50.42
5,596.52 06/28112 51.57 50.44
5,595.03 09/27/12 53.06 51.93
5,596.62 12/28/12 51.47 50.34
5,593.54 03/28/13 54.55 53.42
5,592.38 06/27113 55.71 54.58
5,591.65 09/27/13 56.44 55.31
5,590.34 12/20113 57.75 56.62
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-2
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitorin8 (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,625.75 5,626.69 0.94 95
5,611.37 02/06/09 15.32 14.38
5,610.63 07/21109 16.06 15.12
5,609.73 09/21109 16.96 16.02
5,607.08 11/02/09 19.61 18.67
5,606.57 12/14/09 20.12 19.18
5,612.45 03/11110 14.24 13.30
5,612.78 05111110 13.91 12.97
5,611.37 09/29/10 15.32 14.38
5,610.24 12/21110 16.45 15.51
5,610.64 02/28/11 16.05 15.11
5,609.78 06/21/11 16.91 15.97
5609.79 09/20111 16.90 15.96
5609.72 12/21/11 16.97 16.03
5,605.69 03/27/12 21.00 20.06
5,605.67 06/28/12 21.02 20.08
5,603.03 09/27/12 23.66 22.72
5,605.76 12/28112 20.93 19.99
5,598.28 03/28113 28.41 27.47
5,594.32 06/27113 32.37 31.43
5,594.38 09/27/13 32.31 31.37
5,594.68 12/20/13 32.01 31.07
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -3
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitorin~ (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,633.64 5,634.50 0.86 110
5,603.77 02/06/09 30.73 29.87
5,602.37 07/21109 32.13 31.27
5,602.34 09/21/09 32.16 31.30
5,602.60 10/28/09 31.90 31.04
5,603.12 12114/09 31.38 30.52
5,602.90 03/11/10 31.60 30.74
5,603.23 05111110 31.27 30.41
5,602.86 09/29/10 31.64 30.78
5,603.35 12/21110 31.15 30.29
5,602.89 02/28111 31.61 30.75
5,602.75 06/21111 31.75 30.89
5,602.40 09/20111 32.10 31.24
5,602.40 12/21111 32.10 31.24
5,601.70 03/27/12 32.80 31.94
5,601.67 06/28/12 32.83 31.97
5,600.50 09/27/12 34.00 33.14
5,601.74 12/28112 32.76 31.90
5,598.60 03/28/13 35.90 35.04
5,597.18 06/27/13 37.32 36.46
5,597.36 09/27/13 37.14 36.28
5,597.60 12/20/13 36.90 36.04
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -4
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,641.04 5,641.87 0.83 136
5,601.47 02/06/09 40.40 39.57
5,604.26 07/21109 37.61 36.78
5,605.02 09/21109 36.85 36.02
5,605.87 10/28/09 36.00 35.17
5,605.81 12/14/09 36.06 35.23
5,605.31 03/11110 36.56 35.73
5,605.36 05/11/10 36.51 35.68
5,604.59 09/29110 37.28 36.45
5,604.42 12/21110 37.45 36.62
5,603.69 02/28/11 38.18 37.35
5,603.36 06/21111 38.51 37.68
5,602.82 09/20/11 39.05 38.22
5,602.79 12/21111 39.08 38.25
5,600.82 03/27112 41.05 40.22
5,600.84 06/28/12 41.03 40.20
5,598.47 09/27/12 43.40 42.57
5,600.86 12/28/12 41.01 40.18
5,595.57 03/28/13 46.30 45.47
5,594.12 06/27/13 47.75 46.92
5,593.33 09/27/13 48.54 47.71
5,591.92 12/20/13 49.95 49.12
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-6
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitorin~ (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,663.03 5,664.94 1.91 135
5,589.52 08/25/09 75.42 73.51
5,589.46 09/22/09 75.48 73 .57
5,589.61 11/03/09 75.33 73.42
5,589.92 12114/09 75.02 73.11
5,590.24 03/11110 74.70 72.79
5,590.40 05111110 74.54 72.63
5,590.24 09129110 74.70 72.79
5,590.49 12/21110 74.45 72.54
5,590.16 02/28111 74.78 72.87
5,590.44 06/21111 74.50 72.59
5,590.35 09/20/11 74.59 72.68
5,590.67 12/21111 74.27 72.36
5,590.34 03/27/12 74.60 72.69
5,590.32 06/28/12 74.62 72.71
5,589.77 09/27112 75.17 73.26
5,589.67 12/28/12 75.27 73.36
5,589.45 03/28113 75.49 73.58
5,589.01 06/27/13 75.93 74.02
5,588.99 09/27/13 75.95 74.04
5,588.15 12/20/13 76.79 74.88
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -7
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,647.39 5,649.26 1.87 120
5,552.56 08/25/09 96.70 94.83
5,558.34 09/21/09 90.92 89.05
5,558.82 11110/09 90.44 88.57
5,558.96 12114/09 90.30 88.43
5,559.54 03/11/10 89.72 87.85
5,559.60 05/11110 89.66 87.79
5,559.83 09/29110 89.43 87.56
5,559.00 12/21/10 90.26 88.39
5,559.68 02/28111 89.58 87.71
5,560.43 06/21111 88.83 86.96
5,560.46 09/20/11 88.80 86.93
5,560.78 12/21111 88.48 86.61
5,560.92 03/27112 88.34 86.47
5,560.87 06/28/12 88.39 86.52
5,561.40 09/27112 87.86 85.99
5,561.50 12/28/12 87.76 85.89
5,562.01 03/28113 87.25 85.38
5,562.21 06/27113 87.05 85.18
5,562.41 09/27113 86.85 84.98
5,562.23 12/20/13 87.03 85.16
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-14
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitorin~ (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,647.80 5,649.53 1.73 135
5,586.18 11/04/09 63.35 61.62
5,586.51 12/14/09 63.02 61.29
5,586.71 03111110 62.82 61.09
5,586.72 05/11/10 62.81 61.08
5,586.53 09/29/10 63.00 61.27
5,586.80 12/21110 62.73 61.00
5,586.74 02/28111 62.79 61.06
5,586.84 06/21111 62.69 60.96
5,586.73 09/20/11 62.80 61.07
5,586.98 12/21111 62.55 60.82
5,587.07 03/27/12 62.46 60.73
5,587.10 06/28/12 62.43 60.70
5,587.07 09/27112 62.46 60.73
5,587.33 12/28/12 62.20 60.47
5,587.43 03/28113 62.10 60.37
5,587.43 06/27113 62.10 60.37
5,587.72 09/27113 61.81 60.08
5,587.22 12/20/13 62.31 60.58
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-16
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,651.07 5,652.70 1.63 100
5,603.34 11/04/09 49.36 47.73
5,603.56 12114/09 49.14 47.51
5,603.84 03111110 48.86 47.23
5,604.31 05/11110 48.39 46.76
5,604.28 09129110 48.42 46.79
5,604.39 12/21110 48.31 46.68
5,604.20 02/28/11 48.50 46.87
5,604.55 06/21/11 48.15 46.52
5,604.74 09/20/11 47.96 46.33
5,604.94 12/21111 47.76 46.13
5,604.84 03/27/12 47.86 46.23
5,604.85 06/28112 47.85 46.22
5,604.99 09/27112 47.71 46.08
5,605.10 12/28/12 47.60 45.97
5,605.22 03/28113 47.48 45.85
5,605.11 06/27/13 47.59 45.96
5,605.39 09/27113 47.31 45.68
5,604.99 12/20/13 47.71 46.08
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -18
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,643.95 5,645.45 1.50 100
5,586.85 11102/09 58.60 57.10
5,600.14 12114/09 45.31 43.81
5,587.36 03/11/10 58.09 56.59
5,587.71 05111110 57.74 56.24
5,587.50 09129110 57.95 56.45
5,607.66 12/21/10 37.79 36.29
5,587.35 02/28/11 58.10 56.60
5,587.71 06/21111 57.74 56.24
5,587.65 09/20/11 57.80 56.30
5,587.95 12/21111 57.50 56.00
5,587.05 03/27112 58.40 56.90
5,587.05 06/28/12 58.40 56.90
5,587.50 09/27/12 57.95 56.45
5,587.50 12/28/12 57.95 56.45
5,587.32 03/28/13 58.13 56.63
5,586.95 06/27/13 58.50 57.00
5,587.02 09/27/13 58.43 56.93
5,586.26 12/20/13 59.19 57.69
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN-19
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,659.59 5,661.36 1.77 110
5,606.17 11102/09 55.19 53.42
5,606.70 12/14/09 54.66 52.89
5,607.22 03111110 54.14 52.37
5,607.89 05/11110 53.47 51.70
5,607.98 09/29/10 53.38 51.61
5,608.41 12/21110 52.95 51.18
5,608.49 02/28111 52.87 51.10
5,608.60 06/21/11 52.76 50.99
5,609.17 09/20/11 52.19 50.42
5,608.90 12/21111 52.46 50.69
5,608.87 03/27/12 52.49 50.72
5,608.86 06/28/12 52.50 50.73
5,608.86 09/27112 52.50 50.73
5,608.86 12/28/12 52.50 50.73
5,609.17 03/28/13 52.19 50.42
5,608.88 06/27/13 52.48 50.71
5,608.92 09/27/13 52.44 50.67
5,608.46 12/20/13 52.90 51.13
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well MW -30
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitorin~ (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5 61 3.34 5 614.50 1.16 110
5,534.92 10/24/2006 79.58 78.42
5,535.09 3/16/2007 79.41 78.25
5,535.46 8/27/2007 79.04 77.88
5,535.06 10115/2007 79.44 78.28
5,535.78 3115/2008 78.72 77.56
5,536.26 6/15/2008 78.24 77.08
5,536.35 9/15/2008 78.15 76.99
5,536.68 11115/2008 77.82 76.66
5,535.42 3115/2009 79.08 77.92
5,537.11 6/30/2009 77.39 76.23
5,536.93 9110/2009 77.57 76.41
5,537.23 12/11/2009 77.27 76.11
5,537.59 311112010 76.91 75.75
5,537.85 511112010 76.65 75.49
5,538.37 9/29/2010 76.13 74.97
5537.70 12/21/2010 76.8 75.64
5537.67 2/28/2011 76.83 75.67
5538.31 6/21/2011 76.19 75.03
5538.15 9/20/2011 76.35 75.19
5538.42 12/21/2011 76.08 74.92
5538.54 3/27/2012 75.96 74.8
5538.60 6/28/2012 75.9 74.74
5538.68 9/27/2012 75.82 74.66
5538.99 12/28/2012 75.51 74.35
5539.25 3/28/2013 75 .25 74.09
5539.05 6/27/2013 75.45 74.29
5539.60 9/27/2013 74.90 73.74
5539.67 12/20/2013 74.83 73 .67
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well MW-31
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,615.26 5,616.40 1.14 130
5,544.07 10/24/2006 72.33 71.1 9
5,544.45 3116/2007 71.95 70.81
5,536.94 8/27/2007 79.46 78.32
5,544.62 10115/2007 71.78 70.64
5,545.37 3115/2008 71.03 69.89
5,544.50 6/15/2008 71.90 70.76
5,545.94 9/15/2008 70.46 69.32
5,546.42 11115/2008 69.98 68.84
5,546.03 3/15/2009 70.37 69.23
5,546.65 6/30/2009 69.75 68.61
5,546.45 9110/2009 69.95 68.81
5,546.75 12/1112009 69.65 68.51
5,547.09 3/1112010 69.31 68.17
5,547.41 5111/2010 68.99 67.85
5,547.28 9/29/2010 69.12 67.98
5547.45 12/2112010 68.95 67.81
5547.37 2/28/2011 69.03 67.89
5547.96 6/21/2011 68.44 67.3
5547.65 9/20/2011 68.75 67.61
5548.34 12/2112011 68.06 66.92
5548.30 3/27/2012 68.10 66.96
5548.40 6/28/2012 68.00 66.86
5548.59 9/27/2012 67.81 66.67
5548.91 12/28/2012 67.49 66.35
5549.14 3/28/2013 67.26 66.12
5548.90 6/27/2013 67.50 66.36
5549.25 9/27/2013 67.15 66.01
5549.16 12/20/2013 67.24 66.10
TabG
Laboratory Analytical Reports
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
4th Quarter Nitrate 2013
1310396-010
Client Sample ID: Piez-01_10162013
ANA L v r1 c AL LAs oRAro R' f s Collection Date: 10116/2013 1105h
463 West 3600 South
Received Date: 10118/2013 1 OOOh
Analytical Results
Compound Units
Date
Prepared
;alt Lake City, UT 84115 Chloride mg!L
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax:[phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Date
Analyzed
10/21/2013 235111
10/22/2013 205911
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method
Used
E300.0
E353.2
Reporting
Limit
10.0
1.00
Analytical
Result
54.1
6.68
Qual
Report Date: I 0/2912013 Page 13 of20
All analyses applicable totlle CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are rcrformcd in accordance to NEL\C pro1oc:ols. Per1incnt sampling inFonnalion is localed on 1h~ attached COC Confidential Busincs.·~ lnfomtation: This report is pruYitk--d for the exclusiYe usc of the
::,&Jn.'SS\.'C. Pri\ile~cs o~su~c-q~cnt ~c of the "~'?c ofthis.cm~))\UlY or any ~mbcr of its staff. orn.Jlroducti~ ~flhis £ql0~ in ~on!"-'Ction .. \\ilh the ~\'crliscnl\.:nl, p~omotio_n or sale of~~}:~rod~t or p~~ ~r in ~nnt.;~on \\~tb t~ n;-puhlica.tion oflhls n:port
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
4th Quarter Nitrate 2013
1310396-011
Client Sample ID: Piez-02_10162013
ANAl vr1 cAl lAB o RAreR, E s Collection Date: 10/16/2013 1010h
Received Date:
Analytical Results
463 West 3600 South Compound
~alt Lake City, UT 84115 Chloride
10/18/2013 1 OOOh
Units
Date
Prepared
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N)
mg/L
mg/L
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QAOfficer
Date
Analyzed
I 0/22/20 13 00 14h
I 0/22/20 13 2100h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method
Used
E300.0
E353.2
Reporting
Limit
5.00
0.100
Analytical
Result
9.22
0.364
Qual
Report Date: 10/29/2013 Page 14 of20
All ann lyses applicable to the CWA. SOW A. and RCRA are rcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling inronnation is located on the attached COC Confidential Business lnformalion: This report is proYidct.l for the exclusive l..L'iC uflhe
~dd~-c. Privileges ofsuhsequ...'111. ~of the ~~~c of this .company or any ~'1Tllx'T ofils staff, or reproducll~ ~fthis report in connection~ '\ilh the ~:cr11semcnt. p~motio_n or sale of any~~~ or ~occss, ~r in ~onru..'Ciion with th; ~-publication of this n.--port
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
463 West 3600 South
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
4th Quarter Nitrate 2013
1310396-012
Client Sample ID: Piez-03_10162013
Collection Date: 10/16/2013 1035h
Received Date:
Analytical Results
Compound
10/18/2013 lOOOh
Units
Date
Prepared
~alt Lake City, UT 84115 Chloride mg!L
mg!L
Phone: (80 I) 263-8686
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
!-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QAOfficer
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N)
Date
Analyzed
I 0/22/20 J 3 003 7h
10/22/2013 2101h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method
Used
E300.0
E353.2
Reporting
Limit
5.00
0.100
Analytical
Result Qual
23.5
1.80
Report Date: 10/29/2013 Page 15 of20
All am lyses applkabl!! h> tht: CWA, SDWA. and RCRA arc p:rrnnncd in accordance to NELA.C protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation i.'i Jocatl!d on the an.achcd COC. Contltkntial BusiltC$S lnfom1ation: This report is prm;ded t'in the C:(CI~l-..·~ use of the
~tldrcs.."t.-c Pri,·ile~cs o[sub;r;;cq~nt ~~oft he n~~n.: ofthi\con;p."lny or any r:mtx,-of its slaff. or r-eprotluctlon ~this ~ in ;on~ction .... \\ilh the ~\·crtisc~t. p~omotio.n Ol"salc of~~ ~00~ or ~-ss, ~r in ~'tl~~ic'tl with the r:,-publication of this n.--port
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: (80 l) 263-8686
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: (80 l) 263-8687
:-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Sample ID: 13103 96-002
Client Sample ID: TWN-01_10162013
Collection Date: 10116/2013 0727h
Received Date: 10118/2013 lOOOh
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result
Chloride mg/L 10/21/2013 1606h E300.0 5.00 26.8
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L 10/22/2013 2103h E353.2 0.500 1.61
Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the
previously issued reports.
Qual
Report Date: I 0/30/20 13 Page 5 of 20
All analyse..o; applicable to the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accorJ.anc:e to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is localct.1 on the attached COC_ Confidcr1tiol Busint.~ Jnfomlation: This report is pro"idcd for the cxclusin usc of the
~ddn.--sscc. Prh·ilc~cs o! sub,scq~nt ~of the ~~~c of this con:'pany or any ~'T.nhcr of irs s1aff. or rcproduct~ ~~this rcpo~ in ~on~cction, y,;lh the ~~cr1iscmcn1, ~omoli~ or sale uf ~ny ~rodu.ct or p~occss, ~r in ~onn~c!ion w!lh I he r~-publicalion of 1his n.-por1
American West
ANAlYTICAl LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
roll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1310396-006
Client Sample ID: TWN-02_10162013
Collection Date: 10/16/2013 0950h
Received Date: 10/18/2013 1 OOOh
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result
Chloride mg!L 10/21/2013 2022h E300.0 10.0 70.4
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L 10/22/2013 2108h E353.2 10.0 111
Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised Information herein supersedes that of the
previously issued reports.
Qual
Report Date: 10/30/2013 Page 9 of20
All amlyses applicable lo lhe C\\'A SDWA. and RCR.~ are ("M.."rfOmk---d in ~cordancc-to NELAC protocols Pcrtimmt sampling infonnalion is locatctl un the ttH;:~chcd COC, Con1idcntial Business Lnfonmtlion: Thi.s n:port is pnnidcd for the exclusiv.;: usc of the
~dd~-c. Prh ilc~cs orsub~seq~L'Tlt t~ uflhc ~~cor this 4con:pany or any ~""DlhL'T ofils staff, or rcproductio~ ?.~this r\.'(K'~ in ~on~ccliun_. \\ith the ~~crtiscn.'M!nl. p~motio_n ~r o:;alc of~~· ~l~l or ~css, ~r in :'"m'";_--c~ion w!lh lh~ ':-p~blicalion ol this rqx-.rt
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
!-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1310396-005
Client Sample ID: TWN-03_10172013
Collection Date: 10/17/2013 0627h
Received Date: 10/18/2013 lOOOh
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result
Chloride mg/L 10/21/2013 195811 E300.0 50.0 163
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L 10/22/2013 2107h E353.2 2.00 23.5
Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the
previously issued reports.
Qual
Report Date: I 0/30/20 13 Page 8 of 20
All ana]y~~ appliL-.lhte to th.: CWA. SOWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling iofonna1ion is locatc..J on the at1achcd COC. Confidential Business lnfom.ation: This report is pn1\idci.l fOr the cxclusiv.;! use l>fthc
~ddressee. Pri\·il~cs o!" s~St.~ent ~ oflhc ~c of this .co"?pany or any ~mb1.."T of its staff. or rcpn.xJucti~ ~~this rcpo~ in ~O~cclion~ \\ith the ~~ertiscml-'111. p~omoti~n ~sale of~~}" roo~1 or P~?CI.!SS, ~r in ~-on~~ion W!lh I""; ";-p~blication of this report
American West
At..IALYTICAI lABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
!-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1310396-003
Client Sample ID: TWN-04_10162013
Collection Date: 10/16/2013 0814h
Received Date: 10/18/2013 1 OOOh
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result
Chloride mg!L 10/21/2013 162911 E300.0 5.00 29.4
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg!L 10/22/2013 2104h E353.2 0.500 1.69
Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the
previously issued reports.
Qual
Report Date: 10/30/2013 Page 6 of20
All analyses applicable lo lhc CWA. SDWA. and RCRA :ul! performed in accortlance lo NELAC prolocols. Pcrtinenl sampling infonnalion is located on lhe atlachctl COC Confillcnlial Business Jnfonnation: This R1JOrt is pro\ided tOr the exclusive use ofthe
~ddrcsscc PrivJlc~cs o! su~~cnt ~of the ~arne of this~con:pany or any ~~bt.'T of i1s s1afT, or rcpmductlo!!. ~fthis rcpor; in ~on~cction ... with the a~vcrtiscmcnt. p~~lio.n or sale of ~~y ~rod~t or p~css, ~r in ~on~c~ion w!th th: r:-publica1ion of Lhis n·por1
463 West 3600 South
;a!t Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
!-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1310396-001
Client Sample ID: TWN-07 _1 0162013
Collection Date: 10/16/2013 0625h
Received Date: 1 0118/20 13 1 OOOh
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result
Chloride mg!L 10/21/2013 1543h E300.0 1.00 5.70
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg!L 10/22/2013 2042h E353.2 0.100 0.986
Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated. or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the
previously issued reports.
Qual
Report Date: I 0/30/2013 Page 4 of 20
All analyses applicable lo the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accortlance to NELAC prolocols. Pcrlin.enl ~mpling information i.o; located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This n:port is prmidcd for the exclusive usc of the
~rcsscc. Pri\·ilc~es o~ subr~'Tit ~of the ~c of this .con:'pany or any ~~er of its staff. or reproduct~ ~~this r~ in ~~ionr \\lth lhc ~vcr1io;e~nt, ~omoli~ or sale of ~~Y. ~rod~t or ~occss, ~r in ~o~c~ion w~th l~ r:_~blicalion of lhis n:port
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1310396-009
Client Sample ID: TWN-07R_l0152013
Arar vrrcAt 1 AaoRAroRIEs Collection Date: 10115/2013 0724h
Received Date:
Analytical Results
463 West 3600 South Compound
)alt Lake City, UT 84115 Chloride
1 0118/2 0 13 1 OOOh
Units
mg!L
Date
Prepared
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Phone:[phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail : [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Date
Analyzed
10/21/2013 2328h
I 0/22/20 13 2057h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method
Used
E300.0
£353.2
Reporting
Limit
1.00
0.100
Analytical
Result
< 1.00
< 0.100
Qual
Report Date: 10/29/2013 Page 12 of20
All anaf)'!-CS applicable tu the-C\\'A, SOWA. and RCRA an; JX'rf\.UlTK'd in accordance lo NELAC rrotocols. Pcr1im:nt ~ling infmmalion is located oolhc atlachct.l COC. Conlidcnlial Busim.'S.." lnfoml3tirnr This report is prO\i<k.'i.l for lhc c~clusi,·t! ltSC of the
~kln."SS~.-c. Pri' ib.:~C!" o~~ub_:-"CQ~nt ~~oft he~~~ oflhis _con~r,.my urany "2.~mbl.!r of its s:t;.lfl orn..,..roducti~ ~~this n~ in~o~.:clion~ \\;lh the ac._!_~crti.<:en_'k!nl. r~onlQtio_n l~r ~lc of~~Y. ~rodt~ct or p~css, ~rin ~-un"';_'C~ion w~t.h t~ n:_-public~tWn oflhi!i n:port
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1310396-004
Client Sample ID: TWN-18_10162013
ANA LY TI CA L LAooRATORIEs Collection Date: 10116/2013 0858h
Received Date:
Analytical Results
463 West 3600 South Compound
)alt Lake City, UT 84115 Chloride
10/18/2013 lOOOh
Units
Date
Prepared
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N)
mg/L
mg/L
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Jabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Date
Analyzed
10/21/2013 1935h
10/22/2013 2106h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method
Used
E300.0
E353.2
Reporting
Limit
10.0
0.500
Analytical
Result
67.3
2.15
Qual
Report Date: 10/29/2013 Page 7 of20
All anal)'scs applicable tu the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are performt.-d in acron.Jancc to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation i/'i located on I he attached CDC Confidential Busim.-ss Jnformaliun: This report is prU\;ded for the cxclmi\·c usc of the
~i.ldrcsscc PJi\·iJc~~ or Slll?'=q~"Trt ~of the~ ofth\s ,c~paO)' or any ~~bl'T Of its staff. or reproduc.tio~ ~~I his I'L'fK>~ in ~O~tction~ \\ith the ~\'ertlscmcnl. ('l~omo1io.n OJ s.aJc ofa~y ~rod~1 OT p~ocess, ~r in ~on~! ion W~lh I~ ":-publication or this rt:p011
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 4th Quarter Chloroform 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1310621-008
Client Sample ID: TW4-22_10292013
Collection Date: 10/29/2013 1227h
Received Date: 10/31/2013 0935h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mgiL
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Date
Analyzed
ll/3/2013 0936h
ll/512013 2049h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
E300.0 100 501
E353.2 10.0 45.2
Report Date: II /7/20 13 Page 13 of 34
All ann lyses opplirohlr: lu Jhc CWA, SDWA. <tnd RCRA :m: pcrfolfllC'tl in accordmce lo NElAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infOJl'Jlalion is )I)(;Olted on !he attached CDC. Cunfilkntial Business lnformaliun: This report is pmvi&d for tlu: exclusive usc ofthe
~ddrcs..~·c. Pri~·ilc~~ o!'sub;-.c~n1 ~~of the~ ufthis._co1~pany or any ~~1>\.'7 of ils stdf. or rcproducti~ ~fthis TL"JK>l! in ~'tlion~ \\ilh the ~\'cl1iscmcn1, p~omolio_n or sak: uf ?~Y ~~cl OJ p~~· ~r in ~o~~ion w~th t~ n;.·publit::.rion of this repon
American West
ANALY TICAL LABOFlATORIES
463 West 3600 South
:lalt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 4th Quarter Chloroform 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1310621-003
Client Sample ID: TW4-24_10292013
Collection Date: 10/29/2013 1220h
Received Date: 10/3112013 0935h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Date
Analyzed
1113/2013 0740h
1115/2013 2035h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
£300.0 100 1,030
£353.2 10.0 34.6
Report Date: lln/2013 Page 8 of34
AU nroly.se.."' applicabl~;: 10 the CWA. SDWA, ant.! RCRA arc pcrfol11'ie1J in accordance lo NELAC protocols. Pcrtin~nt sampling informalioo is located on t~ atlachC'd COC. Cllnfkkntial Buslncs:s lnfonn::.tion: Thi., rqKtl1 i!.; pnwidcJ for~ c.'d~r.·c usc ofthe
~ddn:s~-c. J>ri\;lc~cs o: ~ub~scq~'"Tlt ~c of I he ~~c oflhis .'on?("Qny or ;:my ~"mlx.'T of its staff. or rcproduc1io~ ~f this rcpo~ in ~on?'-'ctiol~ ~ilh lhc ~vcrti..-.c~"lll. ~rio_n ~ ~lc of~~ ~uct t.M' ~~"'!>, ~r in ~"'~~ion w~th t~ r:·p~hlication ofthi~ l\T'Of1
American West AN~t VTl CA l LAeOAATORifS
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 4th Quarter Chloroform 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1310621-002
Client Sample ID: TW4-25_10292013
Collection Date: 10/29/2013 1204h
Received Date: I 0/31/2013 093 5h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Date
Analyzed
I 1/3/2013 0716h
ll/5/2013 2033h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
E300.0 50.0 88.6
E353.2 1.00 6.10
Report Date: lln/2013 Page 7 of34
All un.1lysc.s npplic<:~hle to1he CWA. SOWA. and RCRA arc pcrformctl in accnn:bnce to NELAC prolo.;oh Pt!rtinent :'iampting infomtr.liun i.." loc~ted on the attached COC. Confidrnti31 Burincs.~ ln"fom'llrion: Thi~ rep.•n is pru\itkd for the culus"iw U!>C oftht:
~tldn::s..<>cc. Pri\·ilc~c." o~ sub;-c~cn1 ~c of the ~~~lC of this .con,tpany or any~~ of it-; staff. or n:producti~ ~~this rcpo~ in :on~ction~ v.ilh lhc ~crtio;c~nl, ~o:nlOri~ ~~It: of~~~~ or ~'CSS, ~r in ~o~!ioo w~tb I~ ":_~hliCilrion "fthi.o; n:porl
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 4th Quarter Chloroform 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1311306-014
Client Sample ID: TW4-60_11142013
Collection Date: 11/14/2013 0700h
Received Date: 11115/2013 0850h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Date
Analyzed
11122/2013 1232h
11/15/2013 1735h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
E300.0 1.00 < 1.00
E353.2 0.100 <0.100
Report Date: II /26/2013 Page 19 of 45
All analyses opplicuble to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA ::JJ"\! perfom1etl in accordance to N6LAC protocols Pcr1inent sampling infom~ution is located on the atlached COC~ Confidential Business lnfonnation: This report is provided fort he e)(clusivc usc of the
ndtlrcssccJ Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this com puny or any me~1hcr of its slafr. or rcprod.uctio~ ~this rcpo~ in ~nn~1.:ction~ with the a~vcrtiscmcnt, p~omotio,n o.r ~ale of~~Y. ~rod~ct or p~occsti, ~r in :onm~c!ion w!1h th7 r~-p~blication or this n:por:
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Sample ID: 13I 0396-008
Client Sample ID: TWN-60_IOI72013
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIEs Collection Date: IO/I7/20I3 0845h
Received Date:
Analytical Results
463 West 3600 South Compound
:>alt Lake City, UT 84II5 Chloride
I 0118/2013 I OOOh
Units
Date
Prepared
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N)
mg/L
mg/L
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web : www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Date
Analyzed
10/21/2013 2108h
I 0/22/2013 2052h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method
Used
E300.0
E353.2
Reporting
Limit
1.00
0.100
Analytical
Result Qual
< 1.00
< 0.100
Report Date: 10/29/2013 Page II of20
All anai)'SC.S applic-.lblc lo lhc CWA, SDWA. and Rl'RA arc ('IC"rfmTnt.'tl in accordallt'C 10 NELAC ['Niocols, P~rtinc-nl sampling infonnation is ICK.:Ilh .. "l... on the auachctl COC. Confiikntlal Busincs.o; lnfom\alion: This n:port is pro\·itkd l(lr th~: exclusiYi: usc of the
~n."SSL'C Pri\·ilc~cs o~sub;"C\{~II.mt ~ oflhc ~:u_nc orthis.con~pany or any ~dx.'fofits .staff, or rcproductirn~ ?,fthis n:pm~ in ~n~-clilm~ \\ilh lhc ~\'crtiscnlenl. ~tio.n ~~lc of~~Y .. ~rod~ I or p~ess, ~r in :'On'":-c!ion w!lh t~ ':p~blic<~lion oflhi.-. n:port
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1310396-007
Client Sample ID: TWN-65_10162013
~NAtvrl c At l AaoRATORirs Collection Date: 10116/2013 0727h
Received Date:
Analytical Results
463 West 3600 South Compound
~alt Lake City, UT 84115 Chloride
10/18/2013 1 OOOh
Units
Date
Prepared
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N)
mg/L
mg/L
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax:[phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Date
Analyzed
10/21/2013 2045h
10/22/2013 2050h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method
Used
E300.0
E353.2
Reporting
Limit
5.00
0.100
Analytical
Result
27.1
1.48
Qual
Report Date: I 0/29/20 13 Page I 0 of 20
All analyses urrli..Olblc to lhc CWA. SDWA. and RCR...\ are rcrfonm'd in accurdancc to NELAC protocols Pertinent :sampling infonnaiJOn is Jocakd on I he <tltachC'1.1 CDC. Confilk:ntiol Business lnfomlatilm: This. n:port is pruvilktl for the I!Xclusi'\C u..._-.c of the
~li..Jrcs~"'C-Pri\;k~~ or~ub .... Soeq~'f\1 ~or the ~~-m: of lhis .. con!p:lny or lliiY ~-mb-..T of its .slafT. or rcproducti~ ~~this n'fll)~ in ~on~ction~ with the B~\'cl1iscmcnt. P~''o:n l~ ~lc or ~~Y. J?"oth.~·· or (l~"'-~. ~r in ~'On~~ion w~th ·~ r:-rublicalion of lhi~ T\.1l0rt
American West
Jl l Al¥HQ.AI l"IIOIIAfr.>ll lll!
463 West 3600 South
;ait Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax:[phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Garrin Palmer
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
TEL: [phone]
RE: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2013
Dear Garrin Palmer: LabSetiD: 1310396
American West Analytical Laboratories received 12 sample(s) on 10/18/2013 for the
analyses presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AWAL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) in Utah and Texas; and is
state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, and Missouri.
All analyses were performed in accordance to the NELAP protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation scope documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
This is a revision to a report originally issued 10/29/2013. Some Client Sample ID's have
been updated. Pages 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 9 have been revised.
Thank. You,
Approved by:
Ky I e F . Digitally signed by Kyle F. Gross
DN: cn=Kyle F. Gross, o=AWAL,
ou=AWAL-Laboratory Director,
G roSS email=[e-mail], c=US
Dale: 2013.10.30 13:34:26 -{)6'00'
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 10/30/2013 Page I of20
All anai)'5C.s applicable to the C\\'A, SDWA. and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampl-Ing information i.s located on the a Hac hell COC Confitkntial Busincs...;; Information: This repor1 is pro\ idcd for the exclusive usc of the
~tldrcssce. Pri\ ilc~cs o: sub_scq~cnt ~ oflhe ~~~e uf this 1con!pany or any ~'>Jllbcr of its staff. or rcproducliu.!! of this rcpo~ in ,con~cction. \\-ith the a~yertiscmcnt, p!omolio1n or sale of ?~Y ~rod~cf or p~occss, ~r in ~on~c~ion w~th th~ r:_-publicalion of !hi., report
SAMPLE SUMMARY
American West Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Set ID: 1310396
Date Received: 10/18/2013 1 OOOh
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
463 West 3600 South
1310396-00 1A TWN-07 10162013 10/16/2013 0625h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
~alt Lake City, UT 84115 1310396-0018 TWN-07 _10 162013 10/16/2013 0625h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
131 03 96-002A TWN-01_10162013 10/16/2013 0727h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1310396-0028 TWN-01 10162013 10/16/2013 0727h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Phone: [phone] 1310396-003A TWN-04 10162013 10/16/2013 0814h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Toll Free: [phone] 1310396-0038 TWN-04 10162013 10/16/2013 0814h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Fax: [phone] 1310396-004A TWN-18_10162013 10/16/2013 0858h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1310396-0048 TWN-18 10162013 10/16/2013 0858h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
~-mail: [e-mail] 1310396-005A TWN-03 10172013 10/17/2013 0627h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1310396-0058 TWN-03 10172013 10/17/2013 0627h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
web: www.awal-labs.com 1310396-006A TWN-02_10162013 10/16/2013 0950h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1310396-0068 TWN-02 10162013 10/16/2013 0950h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1310396-007A TWN-65 _10162013 10/16/2013 0727h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Kyle F. Gross 1310396-0078 TWN-65_10162013 10/16/2013 0727h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Laboratory Director 1310396-00SA TWN-60_10172013 10/17/2013 0845h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1310396-0088 TWN-60 10172013 10/17/2013 0845h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Jose Rocha 1310396-009A TWN-07R 10152013 10/15/2013 0724h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
QA Officer 1310396-0098 TWN-07R_10152013 10/15/2013 0724h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1310396-010A Piez-01_10162013 10/16/2013 l105h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1310396-0108 Piez-0 1 10162013 10/16/2013 1105h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1310396-0llA Piez-02 101620 13 10/16/2013 1010h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1310396-0118 Piez-02_10162013 10/16/2013 1010h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1310396-012A Piez-03 _10162013 10/16/2013 1035h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1310396-0128 Piez-03_10162013 10/16/2013 1035h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the
previously issued reports.
Report Date: I 0/30/2013 Page 2 of20
All analyses applicable lo the CW A. SDWA, and RCRA nrc pcrfOTTTlCd in accordance to NElAC protocols. Pertinent sampling lnfonna1ion is localcd on the attached COC Confidential Buslncss Information: fhjs report is prm;dcd for Lhc cxclusi\·c usc of the
~lldrcsscc. Prl\·ilc~cs 0~ sub~scq~cnt ~oft he ~~~cor this ... co~pany or any "!;'lllbcr of its staff, or rcproducli~ ~fthis rcpo~ In ~on~cction~ Y.ith the ~vcrtisc~nt, ~omolio.n or sale oF ~~y rnld~cl ur p~ocess, ~r in :onn:_c~ion W~lh n .. : rc-publicalion of Ibis n!port
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
foil Free: [phone]
Fax:[phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Inorganic Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
4th Quarter Nitrate 2013
1310396
10/18/2013
10115, 10/16 & 10117/2013
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation for the
samples were performed within the method holding times. The samples were properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, DUP:
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Duplicate (DUP): The parameters that required a duplicate analysis had RPDs
within the control limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: I 0/29/2013 Page 3 of 20
All analyses applirohle h.) the CWA. SD\\' A. and RCRA arc rcrformed in accordance to NELAC pro1ocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached CDC Confit.k:ntial Business Jnfonnation: This n!port is pnwjdcd for the C;\c)~Yc usc oflhc
':ddrcs.sce Pri\·il!:~cs o~ suh!cq~cnt ~o;e of the ~:u_nc ofthls .con~p:~ny or any "_!'lTlbL'T of irs staff. or rcprodue1i~ ~~this rcvo~ in ~on~cction~ wi1h the ~~cJ1iser1_1cnl. p~omolio.n or sale of~~ ~rod~1 or pr_occs..", ~r in :onncc~ion \\ !'h I~ rc~publication of this report
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Lab Set ID: 1310396
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2013
Analyte
Lab Sample ID: 1310396-006BDUP
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N)
Lab Sample ID: 1310396-0llBDUP
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (U5 N)
Result Units Method
Date Analyzed: l 0/25/2013 l856h
113 mg/L E353.2
Date Analyzed: 10/25/2013 185911
0.374 mg!L E353.2
MDL
0.252
0.00252
Reporting
Limit
10.0
0.100
Dept: we
QC Type: DUP
Amount
Spiked
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD Ref. RPD
Amt •1. RPD Limit Qual
119 4.73 20
0.371 0.671 20
Report Date: I 0/29/20 13 Page 16 of 20
anRlyscs upplicablc to the CWA. SDWA,und RCRA urc pcrfollncc.J in Hccorc.lancc to NELAC f!rotocols. Pertinent sampling infonnatjon is locutcd on the attached COC. Conlidcntinl Business lnfom1a1ion: This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privilcgi.'S of subsequent usc oft~
UC' of this company or any member of ils ~tufl Ol' rcprodllction of this 1cport in connection with tht: udvcrtiscmcnt, promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the rc~publicution of I his report for any purpose oth~.·r than for the uddn:sscc will be granted only on contact This
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1310396
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2013
Analyte Result
Lab Sample 10: LCS-R60535 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.79
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R60574 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.01
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
Units Method MDL
I 0/21/2013 141 Oh
mg/L E300.0 0.0114
I 0/22/2013 2041 h
mg/L E353.2 0.00252
Reporting
Limit
0.100
0.100
QC Type: LCS
Amount
Spiked
5.000
1.000
Spike Ref.
Amount
0
0
o/oREC
95.8
101
Limits
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD Ref. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 10/29/2013 Page 17 of20
I analyses upplicablc to the CWA. SDWA, und RCRA urc pcrfonncd in uccortlancc to NELAC protocols~ Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business lnfonnation: This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of subs~,..-qucnt usc of tt
nc of this company or any member of its staff, m· reproduction of this report in connection with I he advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the uddrcsscc will be granted only on contact. This
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1310396
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2013
Analyte Result
Lab Sample JD: MB-R60S3S Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride <0.100
Lab Sample ID: MB-R60S74 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) <0.100
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: (80 I) 263-8687
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
_QC_SUMl\'IARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Reporting Amount
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked
10/2112013 1347h
mg!L E300.0 0.0114 0.100
I 0/22/2013 2039h
mg/L E353.2 0.00252 0.100
Garrin Palmer
we
MBLK
Spike Ref.
Amount e;.REC Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt e;.RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: I 0/29/20 13 Page 18 of 20
1 tlnalyscs upp\icablc to the C:WA. SDWA, und RCRA urc performed in nccorcluncl.' ro NELAC protocols. Pertinent sun1pling infonnation is loci.\ ted on the attached COC, Confid~:nti;ll Business Information: This report is pn.widcd for the exclusive usc oft he addl'\:"SSC<.',. Privileges of subsequent usc of tJ.
nc of this company or uny member of its stntT. Ol' n:produ~.:tion of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the rc-pubiication of this report for any purpo~c other than for the tu..ldn:sscc will be gmntcd only on contact This
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1310396
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2013
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: 131 0396-00SAMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.97
Lab Sample ID: 1310396-011 BMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.33
Units
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
Method MDL
Reporting
Limit
QC Type: MS
Amount
Spiked
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
10/21/2013 2131h
mg/L E300.0 0.0114 0.100 5.000 0 99.3
10/22/2013 2110h
mg/L E353.2 0.00252 0.100 1.000 0.364 96.3
Limits
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt '"!. RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 10/29/2013 Page 19 of20
I analyses upplicablc to the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA urc pcrfonncd in uccorduncc to NELAC protocols, Pertinent sump ling information is located on the attached COC Clmfidcntial Business lnfom>alion: This report is provided for the exclusive usc oft he addressee, Privileges of subsequent usc oftt
11c of this company or any member of its stun: or rcprmJm:tion of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the-rc·publication of this report for uny purpose other than for the addn:sscc will be grunted only on contact This
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1310396
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2013
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: 1310396-00SAMSD Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 5.00
Lab Sample ID: 1310396-0liBMSD Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.41
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: (801 ) 263-8686, Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Units Method
10/2112013 2155h
mg/L E300.0
10/22/2013 2115h
mg!L E353.2
MDL
O.QII4
0.00252
Reporting
Limit
0.100
0.100
Dept: we
QCType: MSD
Amount
Spiked
5.000
1.000
Spike Ref.
Amount
0
0.364
%REC
100
104
Limits
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
4.97 0.762 20
1.33 5.76 10
Report Date: 10129/2013 Page 20 of20
1 una lyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA urc pcrform~d jn accortluncc to NELAC protocols~ Pcrtincnt sampling information is located on the attached COC, Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for th1..· exclusive usc or the addressee. Privileges. of s.ub~cqucnt usc Qf t~
nc of this company or any mt:mbcr of its stutl: ot· rcproductlon of this report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sak· of any product or process. or in connection with the-rc~publkution of this report for any purpose other than for the adllrcssr.:-c will be gro:~.ntcd only on contact This
UL
American West Analytical Laboratories REVISED: 10-30-13 Denison
Sample ID's updated -RW
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1310396 Page 1 of2
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 10/29/2013
Client ID: DENlOO Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2013 QC Level: III WO Type: Project
Comments: PA Rush. QC 3 (Summary/No chromatograms). MUST report project specific DL's: Cl@ 1 mg/L, N02/N03@ 0.1 mg/L. EDD-Denison & LOCUS.
Email Group;
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1310396-001A TWN-07_10162013 1 0/16/2013 0625h 10118/2013 1000h 300.0-W Aqueous l\/ df-cl
--- -
I SEL :'_ii!(IJ.r.t_£1!_: CL
1310396-0018 N02/N03-W -353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N01N
131 0396-002A TWN-01_10162013 10/16/2013 0727h 10/18/2013 IOOOh 300.0-W Aqueous v df-cl
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1310396-0028 N02/N03-W-353.2 ..t' df-no2/no3
1 SEL Ana{vtes: N03N01N
1310396-003A TWN-04_10162013 10/16/2013 0814h 10/18/2013 IOOOh 300.0-W Aqueous ~; df-cl
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1310396-0038 N02/N03-W-353.2 loll df-no2/no3
1 SEL Ana{vtes: N03N01N
131 0396-004A TWN-18_10162013 10/16/2013 0858h 10/18/2013 IOOOh 300.0-W Aqueous 1'{1 df-cl
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1310396-0048 N02/N03-W-353.2 .-f. df-no2/no3
1 SEL Ana(vtes: N03N01N
131 0396-00SA TWN-03_10172013 10/17/2013 0627h I 0/18/20 13 I OOOh 300.0-W Aqueous ~l df-d
I SEL Ana(vtes: CL
1310396-0058 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL Ana(ytes: N03N01N
131 0396-006A TWN-02_10162013 I 0/16/2013 0950h 10/18/2013 1000h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
I SEL Analytes: CL
1310396-0068 N02/N03-W-353.2 "'' df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N01N
1310396-007A TWN-65_10162013 10/16/2013 0727h 10/18/2013 IOOOh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
I SEL Analytes: CL
1310396-0078 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~] df-no21no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N01N
1310396-008A TWN-60_10172013 10/17/2013 0845h 10/18/2013 IOOOh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
I SEL Analytes: CL
Printed: I 0/30/20 I 3
WORK ORDER Summary WorkOrder: 1310396 Page 2 of2
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 10/29/2013
SampleiD Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
131 03 96-008B TWN-60_10172013 10/17/2013 0845h 10/18/2013 1000h N02/N03-W-353.2 Aqueous ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Ana(vtes: N03N02N
1310396-009A TWN-07R_101520l3 10/15/2013 0724h 10/18/2013 1000h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
I SEL Ana(vtes: CL -- -----1310396-0098 N02/N03-W-353.2 .. .j' df-no2/no3
I SEL Ana(vtes: N03N02N
1310396-010A Plez-01_10162013 10/16/2013 I JOSh 10/18/2013 IOOOh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
--I S~L Analytes: CL ~-
1310396-0108 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-oo2/no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1310396-011A Piez-02 _1 0162013 I 0/16/2013 I 01 Oh 10/18/2013 IOOOh 300.0-W Aqueous >/ df-cl
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1310396-0118 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL Ana{vtes: N03N02N
131 0396-012A Plez-03_10162013 10/16/2013 1035h 10/18/2013 1000h 300.0-W Aqueous r-1 df-cl
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1310396-0128 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL Anaf.vtes: N03N02N
Printed: I 0/3012013
3
;
4
American West
Analytical Laboratories
L~
48S W. 3600 S. SanLak9 City, UT 841 1 5
Phone II (801)263-eee& Toll Freet (888)2flS.a686
Fal t [phone] Email aweiOa'Mll-labB.com
www.awal·labs.com
Client: lllllellD' Fa.ela Reaourcu, ID.c.
Addl1181: 84215 B. Hwy. 191
BlandiDf, UT 84811
Contact: GurlD Palmer
Phone I: (4315) 878·2221 Cell f :
~~ok.CIO:m; ICWi:daol.•eo.o:rcyfllU:C~
Email: 4tu!!I!!""'S11115bl.com
Project Name: 4tb Quarter Nitrate 2013
Pro)ecU:
POt:
sampler Name: Gurlll Palmer, TlmD.er Holliday
·SamtlleiD: Date Samoled
~7_1ou12013 * TWN-07 10162013 10(16/2013
TWN-~2013 * TWN-01 10162013 10/16/2013
TWN"""'-1.018~ * TWN-04 10162013 10/18/2013
TWN·18_10162013 10/18/2013
Tw.N-s_1~ * TWN-03 10162013 10/17/2013
~2...101621)13 * TWN-02_10162013 10/18/2013
TWN-811_10182013 10/18/2013
TWN-80_10172013 10/17/2013
1'WN-G7R..1011SI013 10/15/2013
Pl..Ol_lOUII013 10/18/2013
Plea-Q1_10le2013 10/18/2013
Pleii...03_10181013 10(18/2013
'l;emp Bluak
ROIInqulll\0<1 til': s~gna~w (, '~~ ~(t?ll'.!
P~ni.Nomo.· O~r+--'""' f c...l .,.....,-lt.~O
f'IOiinqulll\0<1 by:
~~
PtW ~"'
ROIInqU10110dtl\':
SIOnaturo
~NNa!ne:
ROitnqv-t>y:
Slgnal\n
iPrf!ll~
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
AI ~will t.oonductod~ NEI.AP -odiTlllltclds...Soll-lllllt. -"'<i~AWAL'a-..w,te RQ-..1~ llmils(f'OI.) ....... ..,...alcaly.....-al-oollllsCholnd!:uSody __ _
QC Level: Tum Around Tme: ~"~!lor---""""..-. ~~wlbo...-bJ5:00pmoo
3 Standald
... ..,..., __
X lnclud& EDO:
LOCUS UPLOAD
UCIIL
Field Fllaled For.
For~Wftll:
0 NE!.AP
0 RCRA
0 CWA
0 SOWA
0 ELAP/#1..2LA
6' 0 NLLAP
~ 0 0 Non-Compliance ~ 0 D Olher. <') ; ~ Is ~ <>l i 0 8 :::E !!:. ll) Known Hazards nme 8 l N ~ &
Samoled 0 i a Sample Comments ....
62lS 3 w X X
771 :z w X X
81. 2 ., X X
8S8 2 w X X
637 2 ., X X
950 2 \V X X
771 2 w X X
MIS 2 w X X
714. 3 w X X
nos 2 w X X
1010 2 w X X
10311 3 w X X
l w
:=:.by.· ~ .. ~ Instructions:
!)/() 51G,
#I..WN..l.ab ~Salt
Page I ol
ru·~~
~Use~ty'
~w-R:o{-)\
:0.8
s "----:.t.:!:L. 'C
··---~ ~0 y • &a:-V . 'N ·-· .., N •-w-(!j~ N
COC;~•W•
k Hoi, <::>CliO..~
2~00 Olijo l'!dlOQO N W.
~ "'-'"'~ e y N
4~ ... ~@ ·y N
~-~
y k l.loblils-rodc;oc~
"
nme: *Sample ID's updated, per Kathy Weinel Pdo!NIIIM:.
~k d.l ......,. !~'//?-/& 10/30/13 -RW
Pm:~UY\~ ~l "..J ITmo.' l'HJo =tii'J { ~
jTime:
!'rlni Norno:
~"'tlf. 0.:
'SlO'IIII\ft nme:
PriniNome!
I
Analysis
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
NOz&N03
O&G
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TP04
Procedure:
Frequency:
Preservation Check Sheet
s ,le Set E
Preservative I :t.. a t/ J (o
pH<2 H2S04
oH<2 H2S04
pH>12
NaOH
pH<2HN03
oH<2 HzS04 .j,.-s v.es J'e-.~ ./~ !l'cl ~J
pH<2HCL 17 II 1/ 11 I'
oH <2 H2S04
pH>9NaOH,
Zn Acetate
pH <2 H2S04
pH <2 H2S04
- -
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from Lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
7
tt.r
I
doH
I? 9
Jfs-y,;.
~
/cl II
y~ d~/ 7
-
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
If sample is not preserved, properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag COC, notify client if requested
Place client conversation on COC
Samples may be adjusted
All samples requiring preservation
* The sample required additional preservative upon receipt.
+ The sample was received unpreserved
• The Sample was received unpreserved and therefore preserved upon receipt.
# The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH< 2 due to the sample matrix
• The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH> __ due to the sample matrix interference
Lab Set ID: /3 lo 3 ~(p
/7._
tfq-
[7
American West
ANAl VJICAL \ AIJO~ATO~IfS
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
!-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Garrin Palmer
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
TEL: [phone]
RE: 4th Quarter Chloroform 2013
Dear Garrin Palmer: Lab Set ID: 1310621
American West Analytical Laboratories received 11 sample( s) on 1 0/31/20 13 for the
analyses presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AWAL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) in Utah and Texas; and is
state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, and Missouri.
All analyses were performed in accordance to the NELAP protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation scope documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
Thank You,
Approved by:
Ky I e F . Digitally signed by Kyle F. Gross
DN: cn=Kyle F. Gross. o=AWAL,
ou=AWAL·Laboratory Director,
G email=kyle@awal-labs com. c=US ross Dale: 2013,11.12 14:25:11-07"00"
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 11/7/2013 Page I of34
All analyses appli~.Wic tolh~: CW A. SDWA. and RCRA an.· ~rfll~d in ac .. ·ord:Jnce I<' NElA( rrutocob. Pcnincnl ~mplin~ infc;mn~lion l .. local~"-' vn the at1.ad1~ COC Con1i~ntial Busincs!' 11\fonnution: TI1is ~IX'" is prmilkd fUr •he c~c:l~i'\e usc of the
~r~~. Pri\'iii.~C~ v~ ~~~~~m ~~o;c of1hc ~~of !.hi;; .c .. •n.lp.1ny ur any~~~~~"' of it~ !\tufl: (.,. o:pro~uclh.~ ~~1his 1\.'flO~ 1n ;un!)~o-<:lit\0__ \\ith lhc ~\t<'f1i~~)l:n1. Jl~omoti~n ~r sale.: of ~~Y. ~TOd~l vr p~~c~<;, ~r in :on~~~ion w!lh t~ '"':"fl~blic.:.lion uf lhi.;; I'L1>nn
SAMPLE SUMMARY
American West Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
At-4 A L VTICA L lA9 0RA.TOR lfS Project: 4th Quarter Chloroform 2013
Lab Set ID: 1310621
Date Received: 10/3112013 0935h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
463 West 3600 South 131 0621-001A MW-32_10292013 10/29/2013 1330h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
;alt Lake City, UT 84115 1310621-00 lB MW-32_10292013 10/29/2013 1330h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1310621-001C MW-32_10292013 10/29/2013 1330h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Phone: [phone] 1310621-002A TW4-25_10292013 10/29/2013 1204h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1310621-0028 TW4-25 10292013 10/29/2013 1204h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Toll Free: [phone] 1310621-002C TW4-25 10292013 10/29/2013 1204h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Fax: (80 l) 263-8687 8260C/5030C
!-mail: [e-mail] 1310621-003A TW4-24 10292013 10/29/2013 1220h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1310621-0038 TVV4-24_10292013 10/29/2013 1220h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
web: www.awal-labs.com 1310621-003C TVV4-24 10292013 10/29/2013 1220h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1310621-004A TVV4-04_10292013 10/29/2013 1302h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Kyle F. Gross 1310621-0048 TVV4-04_10292013 10/29/2013 1302h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1310621-004C TVV4-04 10292013 10/29/2013 1302h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Laboratory Director 8260C/5030C
1310621-00SA MVV-04_10292013 10/29/2013 1255h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Jose Rocha 1310621-0058 MVV -04 _1 0292013 10/29/2013 1255h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
QA Officer 1310621-00SC MVV-04_10292013 10/29/2013 1255h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1310621-006A MW-26_10292013 10/29/2013 1246h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1310621-0068 MVV-26_10292013 10/29/2013 1246h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1310621-006C MW-26_10292013 10/29/2013 1246h Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
8260C/5030C
1310621-007 A TW4-19 10292013 10/29/2013 1410h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1310621-0078 TVV4-19_10292013 10/29/2013 1410h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1310621-007C TVV4-19_10292013 10/29/2013 1410h Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
8260C/5030C
1310621-008A TW4-22 10292013 10/29/2013 1227h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1310621-0088 TVV4-22_10292013 10/29/2013 1227h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1310621-00SC TVV4-22_10292013 10/29/2013 1227h Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
8260C/5030C
1310621-009 A TVV4-20 10292013 10/29/2013 1240h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1310621-0098 TVV4-20 10292013 10/29/2013 1240h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
l310621-009C TVV4-20 10292013 10/29/2013 1240h Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
8260C/5030C
1310621-010A TW4-65_10292013 10/29/2013 1330h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1310621-0108 TVV4-65_10292013 10/29/2013 1330h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Report Date: 11/7/2013 Page2 of34
AIL al\:llysc~ ::~pplic<lblc 10 the CWA. SDWA. :md RCRA ~n; (l('r(,lrmed in accunt:Jncc to NElAC prut,~ub:, f\;-n1ntl\l ·~-·-"i'H inf.lmtati<'n h IU('.t1~t (,Ill lhc atbchN COC. Conti~nfl,d ll$..1:D...-.. lnfo~liun: This I"I!Jlt.'r1 is pwvilkJ ~" d)C"t""t.t.loHo oflhL!
~JX:..~c Pri\·lk~~:S o! suh;"Co.t~cnt ~".: of1hc ~~~11! \lf lhis .con~r~any ur any n!:mh~.-1 of it~ ~taff. or TC'Ilrodu.:t~~ f .. ,~11! t11 ~'~IX1\un~ \\ ith !he a.J_VCf1~~'M,."nl. f'~~lnl01~ Or ~]I! •t ~ffi' trf"""''llo:l 01 p~~I.".">S, ~Tin :()Urk,:~iOn W~th ~ f ~ llaiiUAufllti..io n.=J'kU'\
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
foil Free: [phone]
Fax: (80 I) 263-8687
~-mail : [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Client:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
4th Quarter Chloroform 2013
1310621
Date Received: 10/31/2013 0935h
Lab ample ID Client Snmple ID
131 0621-01 OC TW 4-65 10292013
1310621-011A Trip Blank
Date Collected
10/29/2013 1330h
10/29/2013
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Matrix Analysis
Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Report Date: 11/712013 Page 3 of34
All anal~s applicable toth~: CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are pcrf<•rmed in accordaocc to NELAC rrotocol<;. Peninem ~mpling infonnallon i~ lo.:atcd on lhc attlchcd COC. ·~'rti"'-nui fht1i~ Jnrontuliun: Thi~ repon is flii.J\'hle:d tbt ~1;,q\.:t yf1~ ~n..~e Prhile~c:. of suh:o;cq~cnl ~~~ ofthc ~~of this .coH_l(lany or any ~~ber ofiL" stllff. or Tcp~ti~ ~rtbl!' rep~ in ~on~'lo •. -cti•m_ \\i'b the ~~-cni~~l\..111,f"~Ufnotil~ ,.,. .Jk urll~ ~"t.lil~1 or p~'t'SS, ~r in :Onn:"X'~iOf' w.!lb t~ r~1JUrotJM.,~ h
463 West 3600 South
)a!t Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Inorganic Case Narrative
CUent:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
4th Quarter Chloroform 2013
1310621
10/3112013
10/29/2013
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation for the
samples were performed within the method holding times. The samples were properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD:
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 1117/2013 Page 4 of34
All analyses i1flplicoblc 10 the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are pcrfonnetl inaccord:Jncc to NELAC proiNol". PeJ'Iin ... "Tl1 sampling infom.Hlliools loc:Jt<!d on 1~ annchl!d COC Confitknlial Bu~incs.o;o 1nfonnarion: Thi...,.n:JlCin ls provided for the cxdusi\·e ~of the
~tJdi'CS.<:t.'C PJiyjJc~~ ors-ub_:cq~L'llt ~of lhc ~~~~C ~Jfthis •COll.l!)<IDY I}( UOy ~~lhCT ofit'i Staff, Of n.llrodUCiiO~ ~f1hjs Tt.'(K'l~ in ~Oil~Ciion,. With 1hc ~~ crti~OX."fft. r~omotio,n ~T ~~C Of~l!)~ ~TO<h~t Of ~ess, ~fin ~0~1:~i00 W~lh 1~ ~lication Oflbl.o; report
463 West 3600 South
;aJt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
!-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Volatile Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
Method:
Analysis:
4th Quarter Chloroform 2013
1310621
10/3112013
10/29/2013
Intact
None
SW-846 8260C/5030C
Volatile Organic Compounds
General Set Comments: Multiple target analytes were observed above reporting limits.
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: All samples were received in appropriate
containers and properly preserved. The analysis and preparation of all samples were
performed within the method holding times following the methods stated on the analytical
reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, and Surrogates:
Method Blanks (MBs): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCSs): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Surrogates: All surrogate recoveries were within established limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 1117/2013 Page 5 of34
All ;malyscs applicablt: h> Lhc C\\' A. SDWA. aod RCRA ::~re ~rfunncd ln accord:mc~ to NELAC JlrUlocols P<:rtinrol sampling infOTmiilion i:l.lltea1eJ on 1ht.· 311ltchcd COC Confidcnlial Blhi.ncs.s )nfQml:lti(m: Thi~ n:p.1n ts pnni&d tOr lhe exclusi\'C I..I:!K: of lhe
~Jdrc~c. Pri\ilc~cs o~ sub~scq~--n1 ~....:or the~~ of Lhis .con .. pany or any ~~mbt.'T of il<t s13ff. (lf n:pro.l~li~ ~ftlli<: r.::p.~ 1n ~~cclit:Rl~ \\i1h lhc u..J_vcrti~~l1.111, ~umoliO,O ~ ~lc IJf ~Y. ~od~l \M" ~~~!!$..~Tin :(~~ioo w~th I~ r~-puMica1ion of lhi'i n:por
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1310621
Project: 4th Quarter Chloroform 2013
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R61122 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.83 -Lab Sample ID: LCS-R61202 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.63
Lab Sample 10: LCS-R61213 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N021N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.02
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: (80 I) 263-8686, Toll Free: [phone], Fax: (80 I) 263-8687
e-mail: [e-mail], web: ~'l'w.awal-labs.com
Q_C SQ_MM_.ARY REJ?.QR.T_
Units Method MDL
11/03/2013 0008h
mg!L E300.0 O.oii4
11/05/2013 1038h
mg!L E300.0 0.0114
11/05/2013 2030h
mg!L E353.2 0.00252
Reporting
Limit
0.100
0.100
0.100
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Amount
Spiked
5.000
5.000
1.000
Garrin Palmer
we
LCS
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
0 96.7
0 92.6
0 102
Limits
90-110
90-110
90 -110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: lln12013 Page 27 or34
unulys~.-s npplic:Ibk to th..: CWA. SDWA. :.m<.l RCRA U.t\; p~.:rfonn~.-d in tu:cordanct.· 10 NELA(' prohx· .. )Js. Pt..:"11in..:-nt s:.tmpling infonnution is locatl.~ tm th~ "ttuchcd COC' C'tlllfidcncial H\tsincss lnfomuJiion: This rqxwt is provided f\,r th<: l'Xclu~ivc us~.· of1~ :ukln:s...;"•..,:. Privilcg~..-s of !<illbS~:qlu.·nt us .. • llftt
nc of this comoanv or unv mcmb..:r of its stuft: ur l\.'Dhlt.lucliun ufthis rcnort in conne-ction with th~: mlv~.:.·ttis...·m~.mt, promotion ot sale of any protlu~o:l or process, or in \.'Onnccuon witlt the tc-publicat\on or this r~.::pmt I~H any pUf\lt.lS~: uth~o·r than fnt th\.: 1.1dJn.:sscc wil1l'1~o· gmntl'd only on ~.:c.mll.h.:l This
AN/..LY"' CAl l..AI'\.O RATO~IES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1310621
Project: 4th Quarter Chloroform 2013
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: MB-R6ll22 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride <0.100
Lab Sample ID: MB-R61202 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride <0.100
Lab Sample ID: MB-R612l3 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
NitratefNitrite (as N) <0.100
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]. web: www.awal-labs.com
Q~ .. _SILMMARX .REP.QRI_
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
QC Type: MBLK
Reporting Amount Spike Ref.
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC
11/02/2013 2345h
mg/L E300.0 0.0114 0.100
11 /05/2013 1013h
mg/L E300.0 0.0114 0.100
11/05/2013 2029h
mg/L E353.2 0.00252 0.100
Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD Ref. RPD
Amt •.r.RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: lln/2013 Page 28 of34
anulyS4..-s npplicablc ro the CWA. ~DWA, und RCRA an: IJ'-:rtbnnL'tl in uccon.lwJcc cu NELAC' prult>~.:ols. Pcrtin~nt s:.ampliug infOm1ution is l,>eatcd on 1h~ aua~.:hcd COC'. c~.,ntid~nli:.ll Busith.:ss lnf'i.1m1ation: ·rhis rqwrl is pmvil.kc.J t~r the cxc.:lusin.· USL' ofth..: ~uk.ln.'Ss~..: Privtlcg'-~ "lf:o;ubSL'Qucnt usL~ oftt
nc of this l'Ompany or nny mt:mbCI' uf its statl', \1r ~produdiun of this n:port in l'onnc-dion with th~ ut.JvL'rtis~mcnl. promotion or sa h.· of any product tJr pnx.·cs:s. ur in connL'Clion with th~ n."'-pllblkation of this n:pott ti.w lmy Pllrr'k)SC uthcrthan t\Jr the m.IUr..:~sc~o..· will b..: gmntcd. only un conta..;t This
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1310621
Project: 4th Quarter Chloroform 2013
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: 1310621-00IAMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 270 -Lab Sample lD: 1310621-00IBMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.966
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: ( 80 I) 263-8686, Toll Free: [phone], Fax: (80 I) 263-8687
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
__ QC _ _SU_MM_ARY RE~_QRT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Units Method
11/03/2013 0630h
mg/L E300.0
II /05/20 13 2040h
mg/L E353.2
MDL
0.570
0.00252
Reporting
Limit
5.00
0.100
Dept: we
QC Type: MS
Amount
Spiked
250.0
1.000
Spike Ref.
Amount
35.7
0
%REC
93.5
96.6
Limits
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD Ref. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 11/7120 13 Page 29 of 34
tlnulys'-"S upplkab)(' to th~ CWA. SDWA, and RCRA ttr"' p~..·rfolnll..-d in w.:cortlan<.:l.:' to NEL.AC pmtoc:o1s. P~rtin'-·nt sum piing infOrmation is f,>ea.tcd on rh~ uttac.:hcd C'OC. (\lnfid~ntial Uusim:s~ rnft.urnation: fhis 1cpon is tmn id~d fm th~..· ~xdusiv..: us ... • ofth~ ac.J:llrcss~~. Privih:g.~.--s 1..lf sufY..;,.,-qucnl us~ or ct
liL' ~)f this t mnpany or any m~mb..:r of its si~Ltl or n.!produ~o:l.ion nf this J'(.·port in l:l)nnl'l'tiun with the ad .... crtiSl.'ITtCnl, promotion or sah: ot·;lny produr.:t or pro~;."'L~-s. 01 in connc~..·tion with the n .. --publication lll' this n:po• t ti.w any purfl4J'il.:' oth~.:r th~m f\w th. .. • addr ... ~~~l" will hi..' granh .. ·d only on """mtad Thi~
ANA LYTICAL lABO FIATOR if:S
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1310621
Project: 4th Quarter Chloroform 2013
Analyte Result -Lab Sample ID: 1310621-00IAMSD Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 281
Lab Sample ID: 1310621-00IBMSD Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.971
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: ( 80 I) 263-8686, Toll Free: [phone], Fax: (80 I) 263-86R7
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC_SU_M_MARY REfQRT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Units Method
11/03/2013 0653h
mg/L E300.0
11/05/2013 2041h
mg/L E353.2
MDL
0.570
0.00252
Reporting
Limit
5.00
0.100
Dept: we
QCType: MSD
Amount
Spiked
250.0
1.000
Spike Ref.
Amount
35.7
0
%REC
97.9
97.1
Limits
90-110
90-I 10
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Otliccr
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
270 4.00 20
0.966 0.527 10
Report Date: II n120 13 Page 30 of 34
anulys..:s npplicablc to th~o· C'WA. SDWA, nml RCRA ;tl\: p..:rt'ormc"ll in Ui,;'COrtlun..:~.· UJ NELAC' prut()l'OIS PI.:Jtin .. :nt Slllnpling information is lncah.:tl on th'-' atlal"hl·d coc. (\\lllitkntiul Bu~dm.:ss Information: ('his 1'1.:\l\Jil is Pl\l\ id~tl t~lr the l:'XI..'h&Si\1..' ll~\.· or the tuJllr~SS\.'C. Pri\'ilt:g~:~ or SllbSt:qucnt liS\.' uf I~
uc or this 1.:ompany or any mcmbct· ofits statl~ 1..1r r'-'PI\ldll~tion uf this report in ~unnt'ction with th~ lUh ~..·rtisem"·nt, promotion or sate ul' any prodm:l orprnccss. or ln conn~..·ctiun with thL· re-puhlkutiun ~lr thi~ rcpnrt for any rurp..ls.t.: otht."r than tilr th~..: ud.tln:ss~\.· will h~: g.runt~.:U '"mly on contact Thi~
American West Analytical Laboratories UL
Denison
WORK ORDER Summary WorkOrder: 1310621 Page 1 of2
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 1111112013
ClientiD: DEN100 Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 4th Quarter Chloroform 2013 QC Level: III WO Type: Project
Comments: PA Rush. QC 3 (Summary/No chromatograms). RL of 1 ppm for Chloride and VOC and 0.1 ppm for N02/N03. Expected levels provided by client-see
Jenn. J-flag what we can't meet. ElM Locus and EDD-Denison. Email Group.; ~
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
l310621-001A MW-32_10292013 10/29/2013 1330h 10/31/2013 0935h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ elf-we
I SELAnalytes: CL
1310621-001B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ elf-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1310621-001C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# of Surr: 4
l310621-002A TW4-25_10292013 10/29/2013 1204h 10/31/2013 0935h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ elf-we
1 SELAnalytes: CL
1310621-002B N02/N03-W-353.2 0 elf-no2/no3
1 SEL AnaJytes: N03N02N
1310621-002C 8260-W 0 VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 41 # ofSurr: 4
1310621-003A TW4-24_10292013 10/29/2013 1220h 10/31/2013 0935h 300.0-W Aqueous 21 elf-we ·I
1 SEL Analytes: C~
1310621-00JB N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ elf-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1310621-003C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1310621-004A TW4-04_10292013 10/29/2013 1302h I 0/31/2013 0935h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SELAnalytes: CL
1310621-004B N02/N03-W-353.2 21 elf-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
l310621-004C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1310621-00SA MW-04_10292013 10/29/2013 1255h 10/31/2013 0935h 300.0-W Aqueous 21 df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1310621-00SB N02/N03-W-353.2 0 elf-no2/no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1310621-00SC 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 2
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 41# ofSurr: 4
131 0621-006A MW-26_10292013 10/29/2013 1246h 10/31/2013 0935h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
%M ~ RT ilY' CN I?" TAT []7 QC fB7 ?
Printed: 11/1/2013 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: HOK __ HOK __ HOK __ COC Emailed
WORK ORDER Summary WorkOrder: 1310621 Page 2 of2
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 1111112013
SampleiD Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1310621-0068 MW-26 _ _10292013 10/29/2013 1246h 10/31/2013 093 Sh N02/N03-W-353.2 Aqueous ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
131 0621-006C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4/ # ofSurr: 4
1310621-007A TW4-19 ... 10292013 10/29/2013 1410h 10/31/2013 0935h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1310621-007B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL AnQiytes: N03N02N
1310621-007C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4/ # ofSurr: 4
131 0621-008A TW4-22_10292013 10/29/2013 1227h 10/31/2013 0935h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc r
1 SEL Aoolyt~s: CL
1310621-0088 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1310621-00SC 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; # of Analytes: 4/ #of Surr: 4
1310621-009A TW4-20_10292013 10/29/2013 1240h 10/3112013 0935h 300.0-W Aqueous !Jl df-wc
1 SEL A,nalyces: CL
1310621-0098 N02/N03-W -353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL A11alyt~: N03N02N
131 0621-009C 8260-W 0 VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4/ # ofSurr: 4
1310621-0lOA TW4-65_10292013 10/29/2013 1330h 10/31/2013 0935h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SEL Analytes: CL
1310621-0lOB N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL A,ll(llyies: N03N02N
1310621-010C 8260-W 0 VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4/ # ofSurr: 4
1310621-0llA Trip Blank 10/2912013 10/31/2013 0935h 8260-W Aqueous ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 41# ofSurr: 4
Printed: 11/1/2013 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1): %M 0 RT 0 CN 0 TAT 0 QCO HOK __ HOK __ HOK___ COC Emailed,__ ___ _
CLIENT:
ADDRESS:
CONTACT:
PHONE#:
AMERICAN WEST
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 W. 3600 S. SA!.T LAKE CiTY. UT 84115
PHONE It (801) 2G3-68S6 TOLL FREE# [phone]
FAX It [phone] EMAIL [e-mail]
WWW .AWAL-LABS.COM
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc-
6425 S. Hwy. 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Garrin Palmer
[phone] CELL#: -,,-pa=lm::--...,--,@e,-n_e_r_gy=fa,...e-,ls;-.c-om--;..-KW='""eln;-el@e"' nere;y"'fu""els=-.c-o.,..m::--; --------
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
ALL ANALY8lS WILL BE CONDUCToeD USING NELAP AC:CRE!DIUD MeTHODS AND ALL DATA WIU. Bl! REPORTI!D USINCJ
AWAL's STANDARD ANALYTI! USTS AND REPORTING UMrrs {PQL) UNLJ!!SS SP!!CIPICALLY REaUf!STED OTHBRWISI! ON THIS
CHAJN OP CUSTODY AND/OR ATTACHI!D DOCUMENTATION
\~ \0&:>2\
A W AL LAB SAMPLE SET #
PAGE 1 OF 1
~~J TURN AROUND TiM&: UNLESS OT'HI!R A.RA.ANGBMI!INTS HAVI II DUB DATE:
STANDARD
BI!I!N MAD!:, SIGINI!D RI!PORTS WIU. ••
I!MAILI!ID DY 5:00 PM ON THE DAY
THEY ARI! DUE.
X INCLUDE EDD:
LOCUS UPLOAD
EXCEL
FIELD FILTERED FoR:
LABORATORY USE ONLY
.li;AMI'UIO W~R&; ()-...£5
~~No oeuve.ReD
1
2 AMBIBNT O~
FOR COMPLIANCE WITH: . ~
0 NELAP 3 TeMPI!RATURa ~ •c
EMAIL: [e-mail];yfuels.eom
PROJECT NAME: 4th quarter chloroform 2013
PROJECT#: "' a: >< .. c:< ~
C' a
0 RCRA
0 CWA
0 SDWA
0 ELAP I A2LA
0 NLLAP
0 NoN-COMPUANCE
0 OTHER:
4 Reci!UVED BROKI!N/Le:AKINCJ~ ~ (:)ROPIIRLY~ -('\ -~I .1 · \13 VG \II
5 PJtoP!IRLY PRE&BAVRD b ~~
y N
PO#:
SAMPLER NAME: Tanner Holliday
SAMPLE 10:
DATE
SAMPLED
MW-32_10292013 I \0./"Z.q) 1'3
:z: it ~ ...
z ~ 0 u Ill .J
!2.
(') 0 II:
TIME I~ 0. :l: <( SAMPLED :o:. Ill s 12:
1330 5 IW X
a D' (T) .._ a 0 10 a ~ 5l ~
:t. .. 0 0 0 >
X X
KNOWN HAZARDS
&
SAMPLE COMMENTS
CHecKI!D AT I!II!!NCH
y N
6 Re:ci!!IVBD WrrHIN
~TIMES L/ N
ITW4-25 10292013 \D/2"\ I \3 1204 5 w X X X coc TAPB WAll:
l~NT ON OUTIIR PACKAOB TW4-24 ~029201.3 10/lVI3 1220 5 w X X X 0 N NA
TW4-04~10292013 l0{2q/l:) 1302 5 w X X X . . -~J<JIN ON OUTBR PACKAGIE
· O~\lcr_ Vln.\ ~.eweo v N NA
1MW-04 10292013 \OJ2.'!/\.:!> 1255 5 W X X X .V)Yr-1\u)i'\.
3 PRI!&ENT~Pt.a MW-.26 .102920~3 \0/Z'l./ \3 1246 5 W X X X y 6 NA
TW4-19_10292013 \0/14/1.3 1410 5 w X X X 4 UNBROKON ON Siul~·
I Y N NA TW4-22_~0292013 tr>h.'J/I":> 1227 6 W X X X
TW4-20_1~013 I I0/"2.'1/]:3 I 1240 15 IW I X I X I X
TW4-. 65_10292013 OISCR!PANCIBS S15SAMPL!! t=r.~~~~:c~-------------------------------l~~~~--t-~:::_-i~~~~i-~~~~-+--~--t---t-~~-4--~--~~~---------------------'IL-aouANococR 7 -rrl~ ~'k v N
-
~ti1o RlMk I I I 1 l:v-1
I
R•~ulliKI!D ·~ J 1 lid. / (DATe:
!>,.... .. ,........ --J~ J-1;;-{b~ I0}3o/J3
~CJli'V.ao BY:
SxtHA.TUR.11 / DATE: Sl'eCIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
p,,.,. N......, ....-r:;:nn.:r lfol liJ~~J l~'"'i2oo 1:M N..,.., / 'TIMe:
R•nJiicov'-">-..Y; · ---~ ------·· DATE: I See the Analytical Scope of Work for Reporting Limits and
SICJNATuRe VOC analyte list.
TIME:
PA1tn N.A.wtl
,Recerveo BY:
SIGNATURE
o .. .,.,.~ Rlu.o<<wwnoo 10v:
S.N1MA.nnm
[DAre:
PIUJ<1 N .. LIII! /\ PU..U,.NANto ~: TIMB:
DAte: 7 DATI!: R•c•JVeoav:J..'jn ~
SI<:INATURE! X '
~Ul:CiotW,n BY:
G~..,1,.TUP..1 l~.l'5 \l l3
PRINT NAMe: ~_hL~C'lJ...LLV\. PRINT NAME: /r 1TIME!: T"-'"' <*~~~
A W AL -Analytical Scope of Work
White Mesa Mill Blanding Utah
Page 11 of 13
An~Jytrfml ReJ?ort:ing .Maximum Sample-iSamp~(}
Metl;lod ·· imje' FtoldiiJ.g Preservatioo r ootperaft.n:e
.... ,; , ro ... be ·useW 1 , · · ;i:'ua~~ Req_lliremet;t.ts Re<:(niiements
A45~--rfug!L 2~ None
~~:!or ~
Sulfate
-----E300.0 I -----Carbon~03 A2320 B 1 mg!L 14 days None
~bonate as HC03 A2320 B 1 mg!L 14 days None
Volatile ()rgar:U9 Coll;J,ponn~~hloroform Pio[!;ram •.
Carbon Tetrachloride SW8260B 1.0 11g/L 14 days HCl to pH<2
Chloroform
Diehl oro methane
(Methylene Chloride)
Chloromethane
or
SW8260C
SW8260B
or
SW8260C
SW8260B
or
SW8260C
SW8260B
or
SW8260C
1.0 llg!L
1.0 llg/L
1.0 ~-tg!L
1 2,~chlorobenzene SW8270D <10 ug/L
1,2-DichfONl:>enzene SW8270D <10 ug!L
1,3-Dichlorobemene SW8270D <10 ug!I,
I 4-Dichlorobenzen~ SW8270D <10 ug/L
1-Methylnaphthalene ~ SW8270D <10 ug/L
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol ~8270D . <1 0 ug/L
2,4,6-Trichloropheno1 SWrnQD <10 ug!L
2,4-Dichloropheno1 SW8270J:)'-. <1 0 ug/L
2,4-Dimethylphenol SW8270D <~giL
2.4-Dinitrophenol SW8270D <20 u~
2,4-Dinitroto1uene SW8270D <...J,.e""ug/L
2 6-Dinitrotoluene SW8270q ....... <10 ug/L
2-Ch1oronaphtha1ene SWS).?{JD <10 ug/L
2-Chloropheno1 _s.W"8270D <1 0 ug/L
2-Methylnaphthalene / SW8270D <10 u_g/L
2-Methy1phenol / SW8270D <1 0 u_g/L
2-Nitropheno1 /' SW8270D <10 ug/L
3&4-Meth~eno1 SW8270D <10 ug/L
~3 '-.Dk@orobenzidine SW8270D <1 0 ug&_
4$-binitro-2-methy1phenol SW8270D <10 ug!L
14 days HCl topH<2 ::S6°C
14 days HCl to pH<2 ::S6°C
14 days HCI to pH<2 ::S6°C
7/40 days None <pC
7/40 days None ,......v < 6°C
7/40 days Non.V < 6°C
7/40 days _N6ne < 6°C
7/40 days / None < 6°C
7/40 da~ None < 6°C
7/4.0-'fiays None < 6°C
/1740 days None < 6°C
7/40 days None < 6°C
~40 days None < 6°C
7/40 da~ None < 6°C
7/40 days ~None < 6°C
7/40 days ~e < 6°C
7/40 days None~ < 6°C
7/40 days None -........ < 6°C
7/40 days None < 6~
7/40 days None < 6°C ~
Analysis
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
NOz&N03
O&G
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TP04
Procedure:
Frequency:
Preservation Check Sheet
s ---le Set E ---
Preservative -oo\ -ooL--CO"~ --co-\ i:-tb CCh
pH <2 H2S04
pH <2 H2S04
pH>12
NaOH
pH<2HN03
pH <2 fhS04 b.J-e7 Jp_~ r,l ()_?:J V£0 ves \lz.-S
pH<2HCL I ' r I I I'
pH<2 H2S04
pH>9NaOH,
Zn Acetate
_pH <2H2S04
pH<2 H2S04
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from Lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
-COl
1\J~S
I
-dnH
·-cos-·mer
1\le~ 1\/£S
( Jf
-010
\/£-5.
f
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
If sample is not preserved, properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag COC, notify client if requested
Place client conversation on COC
Samples may be adjusted
All samples requiring preservation
*
+
....
#
•
The sample required additional preservative upon receipt.
The sample was received unpreserved
The Sample was received unpreserved and therefore preserved upon receipt
The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH < 2 due to the sample matrix
The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH > __ due to the sample matrix interference
Lab Set ID: \ ~ '\ Ok?2 \
463 West 3600 South
3alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Garrin Palmer
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
TEL: ( 435) 678-2221
RE: 4th Quarter Chloroform 2013
Dear Garrin Palmer: Lab Set ID: 1311306
American West Analytical Laboratories received 16 sample(s) on 11115/2013 for the
analyses presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AWAL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) in Utah and Texas; and is
state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, and Missouri.
All analyses were performed in accordance to the NELAP protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation scope documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
This is a revision to a report originally issued 11126/2013. Pages 1-3, 20, and 35 have been
updated.
Thank You, I Kyle F Digitally signed by Kyle F Gross
Cl~ cn=Kyle F. Gross, o=AWAL,
II!'•AWAI..-I.Jil>ct~TOI'f Director, omoU•kyie@uwn~l!l~ c=US 01)'1 : 20'1m04 15:10:27 -07'00' Gross
Approvedby: ~------=·~--------------~
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 12/4/2013 Page I of 45
All analyse.s llpplicoblc to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA nre pcrfom1ed in ,occordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling in formation is located on the aUnchcd COC Confidential Businc5s Infonnalion: This rcpor1 is prO\'idcd fur I he e:<c\u!:livc usc of lhe
~lldresscc Pri,·iJe~cs o! sub;~cq~cnt ~~c oflhc ~~',llc of this .con~pnny or any D_!.7mhcr of ils staff, orrcproduclio~ ~f lhis rcpo~ in ~on~cction~ with the a~vcrtiscn;cnl, p:omolio.n or sale or?~Y. ~rod~ct or P~?ccss, ~r in :onn~c~ion w~th th~ n;·publicalion ofthi.s n:por'
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
• Project: 4th Quarter Chloroform 2013
Lab Set ID: 1311306
Date Received: 11115/2013 0850h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
463 West 3600 South 1311306-001A TW4-06 11132013 11 /13/2013 0700h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
;alt Lake City, UT 84115 1311306-00 1B TW4-06 11132013 11113/2013 0700h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1311306-001C TW4-06 11132013 11/13/2013 0700h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Phone: [phone] 1311306-002A TW4-05 11132013 11/13/2013 0708h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1311306-002B TW4-05_11132013 11113/2013 0708h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Toll Free: [phone] 1311306-002C TW4-05 11132013 11113/2013 0708h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Fax: [phone]C/5030C
!-mail: [e-mail] 1311306-003A TW4-18 11132013 11/13/2013 0718h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1311306-003B TW4-18 11132013 11 /13/2013 0718h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
web: www.awal-labs.com 1311306-003C TW4-18_11132013 11113/2013 0718h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1311306-004A TW4-21_11132013 11113/2013 0723h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Kyle F. Gross 1311306-004B TW4-21 11132013 11113/2013 0723h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1311306-004C TW4-21_11132013 11113/2013 0723h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Laboratory Director 8260C/5030C
1311306-005A TW4-29 11132013 11113/2013 0737h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Jose Rocha 1311306-005B TW4-29_11132013 11113/2013 0737h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
QA Officer 1311306-005C TW4-29_11132013 11113/2013 0737h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1311306-006A TW4-11_11132013 11113/2013 0745h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1311306-006B TW4-11_11132013 11 /13/2013 0745h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353 .2
1311306-006C TW4-11 11132013 11113/2013 0745h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1311306-007 A TW4-07_11142013 11114/2013 0813h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1311306-007B TW4-07 11142013 11114/2013 0813h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1311306-007C TW4-07_11142013 11114/2013 0813h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1311306-008A TW4-10_11142013 11/14/2013 0820h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1311306-008B TW4-10_11142013 11/14/2013 0820h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1311306-008C TW4-10_11142013 11/14/2013 0820h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1311306-009A TW4-01_11142013 11114/2013 0828h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1311306-009B TW4-01_11142013 11/14/2013 0828h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1311306-009C TW4-01_11142013 11114/2013 0828h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1311306-010A TW4-02_11142013 11114/2013 0833h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1311306-010B TW4-02 11142013 11/14/2013 0833h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Report Date: 12/4/2013 Page 2 of 45
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA ure rerfom1ed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent 5ampling infom1alion is locateU on tho:: attached COC Confidential Business lnfommtion: This n:rort is provided for the exclusive usc of the
addressee Pri\'ilcgcs of subsequent usc of the name of this com(l<my or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-public~tion or this rcpor -. . .. . . . .. . . . ...... . .. ... ~ . . -~ . . . . . ~ . . .. . . .. . ' . -
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 4th Quarter Chloroform 2013
Lab Set ID: 1311306
Date Received: 11115/2013 0850h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
1311306-01 oc TW4-02 11142013 11114/2013 0833h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
463 West 3600 South 8260C/5030C
1311306-011A TW4-32_11142013 11/14/2013 0842h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
3alt Lake City, UT 84115 1311306-0llB TW4-32 11142013 11114/2013 0842h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1311306-011C TW4-32 11142013 11/14/2013 0842h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1311306-012A TW4-33 11142013 11/14/2013 0849h Aqueous Anions, E300.0 Phone: [phone] 1311306-012B TW4-33 11142013 11/14/2013 0849h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Toll Free: [phone] 1311306-012C TW4-33 11142013 11114/2013 0849h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Fax: [phone]C/5030C
~-mail: [e-mail] 1311306-013A TW4-34 11142013 11/14/2013 0856h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1311306-013B TW4-34_11142013 11/14/2013 0856h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
web: www.awal-labs.com 1311306-0BC TW4-34 11142013 11/14/2013 0856h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1311306-014A TW4-60 11142013 11/14/2013 0700h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1311306-014B TW4-60 11142013 11/14/2013 0700h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2 Kyle F. Gross 1311306-014C TW4-60 11142013 11/14/2013 0700h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Laboratory Director 8260C/5030C
1311306-015A TW4-18R 11122013 * 11/12/2013 0827h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Jose Rocha 1311306-015B TW4-18R_11122013 * 11112/2013 0827h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
QA Officer 1311306-015C TW4-18R 11122013 * 11/12/2013 0827h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1311306-016A Trip Blank 11/12/2013 Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
* -Reissue of a previously generated report. The Client Sample ID has been updated. Information herein supersedes that of previously
issued reports.
Report Date: 12/4/2013 Page3 of45
AIIDnalyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonmtion is located on the attached COC. Contidcntial Business Jnfo•mation: This 1\!I)On is provided tOr the exclusive usc of the
~ddrcsscc P1ivilc~cs o: :;mbrscq~ent ~~c of the ~~~c of this .con~pany or any ~:mbcr of its s.laff, or rcproLiuclio~ ~fthis rcpo~ in ~on~cction_ with I he a~~crtisc~lcnl, p!omotio.n or Sillc of ?~Y ~10d~ct or f.l~?<=css, (;r in :onn~c~ion w~th th~ r:·publication of this n:poT1
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Inorganic Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
4th Quarter Chloroform 2013
1311306
11115/2013
11/12, 11113, & 11114/2013
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation for the
samples were performed within the method holding times. The samples were properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, DUP:
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, with the
following exceptions: The MS percent recoveries were outside of control limits on
nitrate/nitrite for samples 1311306-001 B and -007B due to sample matrix
interference.
Duplicate (DUP): The parameters that required a duplicate analysis had RPDs
within the control limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 11126/2013 Page 4 of 45
All analyses upplicable to the CWA, SOWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocoh. Pertinent sampling informlltion is louted on the aUachcd COC Coutidenti-.1 Bu:-.incss Information: This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the
~ddn!sscc, Privilc~cs o: sub .. scq~ent ~~c of the ~?~c of this .con~pany or nny ·~:~1bcr of its staff. or rcproductio~ ~fthis rcpo'!: in ~on?cctiOT~ wi1h the a~vcrtiscn_tcnt. r;~motio.n o.r ~ale or ~~Y. ~rod~cl or P~?ccss, ~r in :onn:c~ion w!th th~ r:-publicalion of this report
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Volatile Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
Method:
Analysis:
4th Quarter Chloroform 2013
1311306
11/15/2013
11/12, 11113, & 11114/2013
Intact
None
SW-846 8260C/5030C
Volatile Organic Compounds
General Set Comments: Multiple target analytes were observed above reporting limits.
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: All samples were received in appropriate
containers and properly preserved. The analysis and preparation of all samples were
performed within the method holding times following the methods stated on the analytical
reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, and Sun·ogates:
Method Blanks (MBs): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCSs): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Surrogates: All surrogate recoveries were within established limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 11/26/2013 Page 5 of45
All analyses applicob\c to the CWA, SDWA, und RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attnchcd COC Con1idcntial Business Jnfonnation: This report is provided for the exclusive usc ufthc
~Utlrcsscc Privilc~cs u.r sub~scq~cnl ~~c of the ~~~c of I his .con!pany or nny n.2.~mbcr of its staff. or rcproductio~ ~flhis rcpo~ in ~on?ection~ with I he a.~vcrtisc~uml. p~tnnolio.n ~r ~ale or~~y ~rod~cl or p~occss, ~r in ~onn:_c~ion with th; r:-puhlication oflhis rcpur1
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
LabSetiD: 1311306
Project: 4th Quarter Chloroform 2013
Analyte Result Units
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Q_C_SUMM_ARY. REP_QR_T_
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method MDL
Reporting
Limit
Dept: we
QCType: DUP
Amount
Spiked
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
Lab Sample ID: 1311161-013BDUP DateAnalyzed: 11/15/2013 1742h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.33 mg/L E353.2 0.00252 0.100
Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
1.3 1.94 20
Report Date: 11/26/20 13 Page 3 7 of 45
l analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols_. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc oft~
ue oftl1is company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with tht! advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be !::,'TUntcd only on contact, This
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1311306
Project: 4th Quarter Chlorofonn 2013
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R61996 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.58
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R61712 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.978
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R61713 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.03
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: ¥/WW.awal-labs.com
_QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
Units Method
11/22/2013 0137h
mg/L E300.0
11/15/2013 1708h
mg/L E353.2
11115/2013 1851h
mg/L E353.2
MDL
0.0114
0.00252
0.00252
Reporting
Limit
0.100
0.100
0.100
QC Type: LCS
Amount
Spiked
5.000
1.000
1.000
Spike Ref.
Amount
0
0
0
%REC
91.6
97.8
103
Limits
90-110
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 11/26/2013 Page 38 of 45
! analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in acco1dancc to NELAC protocoi::L Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee Privileges of subsequent usc ofth
11e of this company or any member of its staff, or n::procluction of this report in connection with tht! advc11iscment, promotion 01· sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purt)ose other than for the addressee will be grantt•d only on contact This
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1311306
Project: 4th Quarter Chloroform 2013
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: MB-R61998 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride <0.100
Lab Sample ID: MB-R61712 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02fN03-W-353.2
NitratefNitrite (as N) <0.100
Lab Sample ID: MB-R61713 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02fN03-W -353.2
NitratefNitrite (as N) <0.100
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Q_C_ SU_MMARY_RE~ORI_
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
QC Type: MBLK ---
Reporting Amount Spike Ref.
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC
11/22/2013 0113h
mg!L E300.0 0.0114 0.100
11/15/2013 1706h
mg/L E353.2 0.00252 0.100
11/15/2013 1849h
mg/L E353.2 0.00252 0.100
Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 11/26/2013 Page 39 of 45
! analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonn~.::d in accordance to NELAC protocols~ Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC Contidcntial Business Information: This report is pi'Ovidcd for the exclusive w;c of the add1csscc. Privileges of subsequent usc of th
ne of this company or any member of its staft~ or reproduction of this rcporl in connection with tht:: advertisement, promolion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for tht: addressee will be .!Zfantcd only on contacl. This
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC _S_UMMARY RElQRI_
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1311306
Project: 4th Quarter Chloroform 2013 -----
Analyte Result Units Method MDL
Lab Sample ID: 1311306-0ISAMS Date Analyzed: 11/22/2013 0403h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.76 mg/L E300.0 0.0114
Lab Sample ID: 1311306-00lBMS Date Analyzed: 11/15/2013 1717h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10.4 mg/L E353.2 0.0252
Lab Sample ID: 1311306-007BMS Date Analyzed: 11/15/2013 1746h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 15.4 mg/L E353.2 0.0252
Lab Sample ID: 1311306-0lSBMS Date Analyzed: 11115/2013 1853h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.01 mg/L E353.2 0.00252
1 -Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
Reporting
Limit
0.100
1.00
1.00
0.100
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
QCType: MS
Amount
Spiked
5.000
10.00
10.00
1.000
Spike Ref.
Amount
0
1.52
4.13
0
%REC
95.1
89.2
113
101
Limits
90-110
90-110
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
ReportDate: 11/26/2013 Page40of45
; analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, aml RCRA arc pcrf01 mcd in ac~;oJ dance 10 NELAC protocols .. Pcr1incnt sampling info1mation is located on the attached COC. Confidential Business lnfonnation: This report is providl!d for thC' exclusive usc of the add1c~cc Privileges of subsequent usc of th
nc of this company or any member of its staff, or rcp1oduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection willt the re-publication of this report for any purpose olher than for the addressee wi11 be &rranlcd only on contact. This
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone] Laboratory Director
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
_QC_SJIMMAR.Y_REP_QRI_
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Lab Set ID: 1311306 Dept: we
Project: 4th Quarter Chloroform 2013 QC Type: MSD
------~ -~ ----
Reporting Amount Spike Ref. RPD Ref. RPD
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC Limits Amt ~oRPD Limit Qual
Lab Sample 10: 1311306-015AMSD Date Analyzed: 11/22/2013 0427h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.81 mg/L E300.0 O.otl4 0.100 5.000 0 96.1 90-110 4.76 1.07 20
Lab Sample 10: 1311306-00lBMSD Date Analyzed: 11/15/2013 1719h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 11.3 mg/L E353.2 0.0252 1.00 10.00 1.52 97.6 90-110 10.4 7.77 10 -Lab Sample ID: 1311306-007BMSD Date Analyzed: 11/15/2013 1748h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 15.1 mg/L E353.2 0.0252 1.00 10.00 4.13 110 90-110 15.4 2.29 10
Lab Sample 10: 1311306-01SBMSD Date Analyzed: 11/15/2013 1855h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.03 mg/L E353.2 0.00252 0.100 1.000 0 103 90-110 1.01 1.42 10
Report Date: II /26/20 13 Page 41 of 45
:analyses applicabJc to the CWA. SDWA, W1d RCRA arc p~:rformcd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. Contidcnrial Business Information: This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee Privileges of subsequent usc ofth
11e of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than fm the addressee will be granted only on contact, This
American West Analytical Laboratories REVISED: 12/3/2013
UL
Denison
#15 Sample ID corrected -RW
WORK ORDER Summary WorkOrder: 1311306
Due Date: 11126/2013
Page I of3
Client:
Client ID:
Project:
Comments:
SampleiD
1311306-001A
1311306-001 B
1311306-001 c
1311306-002A
1311306-002B
1311306-002C
1311306-003A
1311306-003B
1311306-003C
1311306-004A
1311306-004B
1311306-004C
1311306-005A
1311306-00SB
1311306-00SC
Printed: 12/3/2013
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
DEN100 Contact: Garrin Palmer
4th Quarter Chloroform 2013 QC Level: III WO Type: Project
PA Rush. QC 3 (Summary/No chromatograms). RL of 1 ppm for Chloride and VOC and 0.1 ppm for N02/N03. Expected levels provided by client-see
Jenn. J-flag what we can't meet. ElM Locus and EDD-Denison. Email Group.;
Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
TW4-06_11132013 11113/2013 0700h 11/15/2013 0850h 300.0-W Aqueous [;;'] df-wc
I SEL Analytes: CL
N02/N03-W-353.2 [~] df-no2/no3
I SEL Ana/ytes: N03N02N
8260-W VI VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; # Q[ Analytes: 4 I# Q[Surr: 4
TW4-05_11132013 11/13/2013 0708h 11 /15/2013 0850h 300.0-W Aqueous [~1 df-wc
I SEL Analytes: CL
N02/N03-W-353.2 ["I df-no2/no3
I SEL Alla~\lles; N03N02N
8260-W 1-tl VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I # ofSurr: 4
TW4-18_11132013 11/13/2013 0718h 11/15/2013 0850h 300.0-W Aqueous l~J df-wc
I SEL Analytes: CL
N02/N03-W-353.2 ~J df-no2/no3
I SEL Ana/ytes: N03N02N
8260-W [~1 VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I # of Surr: 4
TW4-21_11132013 11/13/2013 0723h 11/15/2013 0850h 300.0-W Aqueous I~ df-wc
I SEL Analytes: CL --N02/N03-W-353.2 ~J df-no2/no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
8260-W ~I VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Ana lyles: 4 I# o.fSurr: 4
TW4-29_11132013 11/13/2013 0737h 11/15/2013 0850h 300.0-W Aqueous ~I df-we
1 SEL Analytes: CL
N02/N03-W-353.2 1~1 df-no2/no3
__ I SEL Atmlytf!s.: N03N02N
8260-W ,v VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Ana~ytes: 4 I # ofSurr: 4
3
3
3
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1311306 Page 2 of3
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 11126/2013
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1311306-006A TW4-11_11132013 11113/2013 0745h 11/15/2013 0850h 300.0-W Aqueous 1~1 df-we
1 SEL Analytes: CL ----1311306-0068 N02/N03-W-353.2 I~J df-no2/no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1311306-006C 8260-W l~l VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; # ~f Ana/ytes: 4 I # ~f Surr: 4
1311306-00?A TW4-07_11142013 11/14/2013 0813h 11/15/2013 0850h 300.0-W Aqueous l;fl df-wc
I SEL Analytes: CL
1311306-0078 N02/N03-W-353.2 I~ I df-no2/no3
I SEL .4.nafytes; N03N02N
1311306-00?C 8260-W lvl VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# of Sw7': 4
1311306-00SA TW4-10_11142013 11/14/2013 0820h 11/15/2013 0850h 300.0-W Aqueous IY'l df-wc
I SEL Analytes: CL
1311306-0088 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~1 df-no2/no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1311306-00SC 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 l #ojSurr: 4
1311306-009A TW4-01_11142013 11/14/2013 0828h 11/15/2013 0850h 300.0-W Aqueous [vi df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1311306-0098 N02/N03-W-353.2 1~1 df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1311306-009C 8260-W I~ I VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Ana(vtes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1311306-0lOA TW4-02_11142013 11/14/2013 0833h 11/15/2013 0850h 300.0-W Aqueous ~] df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1311306-0108 N02/N03-W-353.2 !Vl df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1311306-0IOC 8260-W [.;(I VOCFridge
Test Graue,: 8260-W-Custom; #of Ana lyles: 4 I # ~(Surr: 4
1311306-011A TW4-32_11142013 11/14/2013 0842h 11/15/2013 0850h 300.0-W Aqueous I~ I df-wc
1 SEL Anal tes: CL
1311306-0118 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~J df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analrtes: N03N02N
1311306-011C 8260-W l'fl VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1311306-012A TW4-33_11142013 11/14/20 13 0849h 11/15/2013 0850h 300.0-W Aqueous I"'J df-wc
1 SEL Ant11yti.!S: CL
1311306-0128 N02/N03-W-353.2 v df-no2/no3
I SEL Analy tes: N03N02N
Printed: 12/3/2013
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1311306 Page 3 of3
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 11/26/2013
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1311306-012C TW4-33_11142013 11/14/2013 0849h 11115/2013 0850h 8260-W Aqueous ~I VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I # ofSurr: 4
1311306-013A TW4-34_11142013 11/14/2013 0856h 11115/2013 0850h 300.0-W Aqueous IY'l df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1311306-0138 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~] df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N -----1311306-013C 8260-W l~i VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I # ofSurr: 4
1311306-0 14A TW4-60_11142013 11114/2013 0700h 11/1512013 0850h 300.0-W Aqueous ~I df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1311306-0148 N02/N03-W-353.2 !Jl df-no2/no3
1 SEL Ana lyles: N03N02N
1311306-014C 8260-W iV"I VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Ana lyles: 4 I # of Sun·: 4
1311306-015A TW4-l8R_lll22013 11112/2013 0827h 11115/2013 0850h 300.0-W Aqueous [~ df-wc
1 SEL Ana~V/e.t: CL
1311306-0158 N02/N03-W-353.2 fvl df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1311306-015C 8260-W [\(1 VOCFtidge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I # ofSurr: 4
1311306-016A Trip Blank 11112/2013 11/15/2013 0850h 8260-W Aqueous I;( I VOCFridge j
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# of Surr: 4
Printed: 12/3/2013
AMERICAN WEST
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 W, 3600 S. SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84n5
PHoNI! II [phone] TOLL F'REE II (888) 263·8886
I
----·-··
ADDRESS: 6425 S. Hwy. 191
Blanding, UT 84511
CONTACT: Garrln Palmer
PHONE#: [phone] CELL#:
gpalmo:[e-mail]; KWch:tel@cmoruYfi:tela.cam;
EMAIL: d~~fllo!s.=m
PROJECT NAME: 4th Quarter Chloroform 2013
PROJECT#:
PO#:
SAMPLER NAME: Tanner Holliday
DATE TIME
SAMPLE ID: SAMPLED SAMPLED
TW4-06_11132013 tl/13/ 1'3 700
TW4-05_11132013 !I/ 1:3) 13 708
TW4-18_11132013 ll/J!)/r~ 718
TW4-21_11132013 1\/1~/1.3 723
TW4-29_11132013 11/131/3 737
TW4-11_11132013 ll/1~/l:?> 745
TW4-07 _11142013 l\/i'-1/13 813
TW4-10_11142013 1{/!'{/l) 820
~4-01_11142013 ll/ (1-\/l'\ 828
TW4-02_11142013 1\/['-\/5 833
TW4-32_11142013 H/11.\/i~ 842
TW4-33_11142013 ll/ 1'1(1) 849
TW4-34_11142013 llll"\/13 856
I
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
ALL ANALYSIS Wll..l.. Bl!!! CONDUCTeD USlNCI NELAP ACCRI!Dft'BD METHODS AND AU. DATA WILl.. ae R.BPORTED US:WG
AWAL'& STANDARD ANALYTe U6TS AND RI!PORTI!'IQ UMrr.C (PQL) UNLZSS 3PEC:IPICALLY ReqUESTBO OTKBRWISII ON THlS
CHAIN OF CUSTODY AND/OR ATTACHED DOCUMENTATiON
QC LEVEL: I TURN AROUND TIME: UNLESS OTHER ARRANGIII:MEN1'S HAVE
BEEN MADB, SIGNr:D RI!PQRTS WIU. 1!11!
STANDARD EMAILBD BY 5:00 P~ ON THE tiAY 3 THEY ARe DUE.
X INCLUDE EDD:
LOCUS UPLOAD
EXCEL
FtELD FILTERED FoR:
FOR COMPLIANCE WITH:
0 NELAP
0 RCRA
0 CWA
0 SDWA
0 ELAP I A2LA
0 NLLAP
"' c;j' c 0 NoN-CoMPLIANCE It c:i Ill ~ ~ 0 OTHER: z Q ~ <'l D' ~ ~ ... ~ z (') 0
0 0 Q C'l u Ill 1!: ~ ~ KNOWN HAZARDS .J ll. ...... :t. " &. u. ~ N () 0 0 c:i 0 ,., Ill 12! > SAMPLE COMMENTS
5 w X X X
s w X X X
5 ~ X X X
" ~ X X X
s ~ X X X
5 r.r X X X
s " X X X
s w X X X
s ~ X X X
5 ~ X X X
s ~ X X X
s w X X X
s ,. X X X
REL.tt-.'QUIDltJI'Q BY: ---'1 II/// n11sJ~ =~~Q"h ~ / DATil: 1'/1'5'/o.~ SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: Sr<>NATURE ...-.. In iiA..O x
..,......, 6\rt,&r Hdll;cf{~ ~6'~ p,.?.d.~<-H.A-?t!"7 T"""r Y".f"rl PRINT NAME:
1311 '!Jo {p
AWAL LAB SAMPLE SET'#
PAGE 1 OF 2
ru•DA~
LABORATORY UsE ONLY
SAMPLHS WER:<;:;
1 SKJPPBD 0 KA,.M~ O:;J •
2 AMSIE~:~
3 Tl!MPI!RATURB °C
4 REC:BIVI!D BROKBN)'l...I!AKING
(INPROPBRLY S0jo)
y N
~O!'Im!:V PRESERV!!D y N
tlota:D AT BI!NCH
y N
s Rec.eiVE.D WITHIN
giNO TIMBS N
CCC TAPII WM:
1 PRaseNT oN 0UTI!IR PAC:KA<II!
y N ~
2 UNBROK.N ON 0UTOr.:;JKACI•
Y N NA
\.
3 PRBSENT ON SAUPL. 8 Y N NA
4 UNOROKIIN ON SAMPEJ
Y N NA
01SCAJ!PAHC~S BI!TW~BN SAMPLS
l.AOO~ AND COC ~?
ReLINQUISHED 15Y: ......_; DATE: ReceiVED BY: { DATI!!: See the Analytical Scope of Work for Reporting Limits and
.SICiNATURE SI(JNATURE VOC analytc list.
TlMI!!.: TIMS:
PRINT NAMe: PRJNT NA.Me:
~UNQU~HZ!D BY: DATE: Recerveo ev: DATE:
SIGNATURe SIGINATUAE
TIME: iT"""' PRINT NAMJ!~ PRINT~
RI!UNQUlSHED BY: PATE' ftECEIVED BY: DATI!:
SIGNATURE SIGNATURB
TlME: TIME:
PR!NJ" NA.M!!_;_ ~RlNT NAME:
I
AMERICAN WEST
ANAL. YTICAL. LAB ORA TORIES CHAIN OF CUSTODY
463 W. 3600 S. SALT LAKE CITY. UT 84115 ALL ANALYSIS WILL BB CONDUCTI!ID USIN<J NELAP AC:::CAQDrT'E!D MI!THODS AND ALL DATA WILL BE RBPORTED USINI'3
AWAL1S STANDARD ANALYTE LISTS AND R!!POPtTINCJ UMrTS (PQL) UNLI!$S SPBCIPICAUY REQUI!!!STI!D OTHEA.WISB ON THIS
PHONE# [phone] TOLL FREE# [phone] CHAIN OF CUSTCDY AHD/OR ATTACHI!D DOCUMBNTAT)ON
I I QC LEVEL: I TURN AROUND TIME: UN..,.,. C>TliD!l AAJUU;Pil......,...ljAYa
IJEIEIN MAD!!, SICJNBD RI!PoRTS WD.J.. De
STANDARD I!MAJU!D I!SY 5:00 PM ON THE DAY 3 TH!!V ARI! DUe.
--·-·-·· X INCLUDE EDD:
6425 S. Hwy. 191 LOCUS UPLOAD
ADDRES-S; EXCEL
Blanding, UT 84511 FIELD FILTERED FoR:
-
CONTACT: Garrin Palmer
[phone] FoR CoMPLIANce WITH:
PHONE#: CELL#: 0 NELAP
[e-mail];.com; [e-mail]; 0 RCRA
eMAIL: dmrk@!:ner&I!'!!;ela.com 0 CWA
4th Quarter Chloroform 2013 0 SDWA
PROJECT NAME: I 0 ELAP I A2LA
0 NLLAP
PROJECT#: Ill 0i' Ci' 0 NoN-CoMPLIANCE a: c:i w >< :;i 0 0 OTHER:
PO#: z 0: "l li' ~ ~ (2 ... 0
Tanner Holliday z ::E 3 0 10
SAMPLER NAME: 0 0 ~ u w 0 ~ KNOWN HAZARDS ..J 2: li) • DATE TIME D. -::t. & ... ~ cot 0 0 0 f3 ~ SAMPLE! 10: SAMPLED SAMPLED • Ill 2: SAMPLE COMMENTS
~~_11142013 I l /1'1/!.) 700 5 w X X X
TW4-18R_11122013 \1/ rz.J 13 827 5 w X X X
TRIP BLANK ll/12./ 1:) 3 w X
RmJNOUmtt~O BY~ jj~
S"'"ATURit -.. •ll tiJ1l/L o .. iJ!S/1:1 I . Race1va~~~ C1J
S!tJN.O.TURA . ./ O.o.=.l//1~ k'7 SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
PR!NT NAtAe: --1'"' r.l'\c.-r Ho\\;~ T .. og~ !"BBNT NAM.{r I h-..t..... 4-/,J,_(L / 1'1MI!: rS"~
~~ 11;~ G
AWAL LAB SAMPLE SET#
---PAGE 2 OF 2
r••D•n'
LABORATORY UsE ONLY
SAMPLBS WI!RI!:
1 SHIPPeD CUI MA.ItD CIS Q
2 AMI!UI!NT C..IUl!
3 TKMPI!RATURE. ___:.t_ •c
4 RI!!CI!IYI!D BROKI!N/LIBAKING
(IMPROPI!!RLY SBAU!D)
y C)
5 c!}.""RLV PAeseRvoc y N
C CKIID AT III!NCH
y N
6 RBCEIVBD WrntlN
IJ:;;LDIN<I T-.ces
N
coc TAP• Wid:
1 PReSENT ON OUTeR PAcKAoe
y N ~
Y N /NA
2 UNBROKEN ON 0UT(:3CKAG2
3 PRESINT ON SAMPL.a 8
Y N NA
4 UNOROK.N ON S.O.MP~
Y N NA
Ol=C1UtJ•AMC:.mi: BBTWI!I!N SAMPU!
y N
IJ.JI .... AND coc ORD?
RllutaUC'Hl!O ev: _; o ... ,.., 'R.I!!CBJVI!D BY: t / DATI!: See the Analytical Scope of Work for Reporting Limits and
Sk!NATURD SIGNATURE VOC analyte list.
TIMe: TIMe:
p,.....,~ PRJN't NAMI!:
Rr.:LINQUISHE!D BY: DATI!: RIC:IUYlr-0 • .,.: DATE:
SI<JNATUR..I!!! $~,4-Aj!'UAW
T'ME! T»Ae:
PRJNT NAMe: PRrtn NAME!:
~E!UNQU&SH!!D BY: DATil: RecaJVBD ev: DATE:
SIGNATURe SICJNATURI!
TIM I!: ·-PRINT NAME!': -~ J0ot"'" NAMI!J_
I
I
I
I
A W AL -Analytical Scope of Work
White Mesa Mill Blanding Utah
Page 11 of 13
Sulfate ~r-r-IDg/L 2~ None
-----E300.0 r r------_
Carbona~03 A2320 B 1 mg/L 14 days None ~
~bqnatc as HC03 A2320 B 1 mg/L 14 days None ---._
nrat}te;djigaJXir-%mn:oJmos~J'lfOi:~fQib:i'{Pfqgr:Wn~ "'"' ~ . ';' ~~@~:.-·. ~ .-·"-~:;.,. ~.'
Carbon Tetrachloride SW8260B 1.0 ~giL 14 days HCl to pH<2 :::; 6°C
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
(Methylene Chloride)
Chloromethane
or
SW8260C
SW8260B
or
SW8260C
SW8260B
or
SW8260C
SW8260B
or
SW8260C
l.O~g!L 14 days HCl to pH<2 :S::6°C
1.0 ~giL 14 days HCl topH<2 :::; 6°C
l.OJlg/L 14 days HCl to pH<2 :S::6°C
ff:\(.oes::.:':f~llh,~irw.powllithenf'S~pJes ®litY.":. · .~ ~-;. ~ :' •.· ~-.., .t···..,.:~~:., ~ _ =-~ . ..A
1 2,4'*icli.lorobenzene SW8270D <10 ug!L 7/40 days None <JYC
1,2-Dichl~enzene SW8270D <10 ug!L 7/40 days None A 6°C
1,_,3-Dicblorob-ue. SW8270D <10 ug!L 7/40 days None ......_./ < 6°C
1,4-Dichlorobeozene--....,. SW8270D <10 u_,g!L 7/40 days Non~ .::::. 6°C
1-Methylnapbthalene ~ SW8270D <10 ug!L 7/40 days ..,N6ne < 6°C
2;4,5-Trichlorophenol ~8270D <10 ug!L 7/40 days V None < 6°C
.2,4,6-Trichlorophe.aol SW~D <10 ug/L 7/40 da~ None < 6°C
2.4~Dichlorophenol SW8270.0'-<10 ug!L 7/4,011'ays None < 6°C
2,4-Di.m.eth.ylphenol SW8270D <~giL ~40 days None < 6°C
2,4-Dinitrop11enol SW8270D <20 u~ 7/40 days None :::: 6°C
2,4-Dinitrotoluene SW8270D ~giL ~40 days None :::::; 6°C
2,6-Dinitrotoluene SW8270D/v<10 ug/L 7/41N4!Js None :::: 6°C
2-CWOl'onaphtbalene SW~D <10 ug!L 7/40 da~ None < 6°C
2-ChloroQhenol ~8270D <1 0 ug!L 7/40 days ~ None < 6°C
2-Methylnaphthalenc ./ SW8270D <10 ug!L 7/40 days l'fst:le :S6°C
2-Methylphenol / SW8270D <10 ug/L 7/40 days Non~ < 6°C
2-Nio:ophenoJ ~ SW8270D <10 ug/l 7/40 days None ........_ < 6°C
3&4-Meth~enol SW8270D <10 ug!L 7/40 days None ~6°C
3,3 '-:p.iclilorobenzidine SW8270D <10 ug!L 7/40 days None < 6"'&..
4)(-Dinitro-2-methylphenol SW8270D <1 0 ug!L 7/40 days None :S 6°C ........._
Analysis
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
NOa&NOs"
O&G
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TP04
Procedure:
Frequency:
Preservation Check Sheet
s le Set E
Preservative I 2.. ~ '( ') ~
pH<Z H2S04
pH<2 H2SO<~-
pH>12
NaOH
pK<2 HNO;
PH <2 H2S04 V'c:-J VeS" tle:_s .Vcs !kf YeS
pH <2HCL I' I I'
pH <ZH2S04
pH>9NaOH,
Zn Acetate
pH <2H2S04
pH <Z H2SQ4
-
-----
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour samp_le from Lid genU_y over wide range pH paper
Do N"ot dip tbe pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
7
ya;
I/
dDH
7 (
Yes v6
/(l !I
YC"S" ~~
17
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
If sample is not preserved, properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag COC, notify client if requested
Place client conversation on COC
Samples may be adjusted
All samples requiring preservation
* The sample required additional preservative upon receipt.
+ The sample was received unpreserved
• The Sample was received unpreserved and therefore preserved upon receipt.
# The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH < 2 due to the sample matrix
• The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH > __ due to the sample matrix interference
Lab SetiD: / {;; / /)0 fJ
/z.-. I} ;-( ;;J
rh Yc:> fk.r v't7 7
~-
TabH
Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
H-1 Field Data QAJQC Evaluation
Voltime
L<roation 2x Caslng Volume Pu~p~ Volume Cheek
Piezometer 1 -
Piezometer 2 --
Piezometer 3 --
TWN-1 36.30 72.60 88.00 OK
TWN-2 NA Cont inuousLy Pum_ped Well
TWN-3 38.39 76.78 52.00 Pumped Dry
TWN-4 50.07 100.14 121.00 OK
TWN-7 11.81 23.62 19.00 Pumped Dry_
TWN-18 56.29 112.58 132.00 OK
TW4-22 NA Comlnu_ously pumped well
TW4-24 NA Continuously pumpc~d well
TW4-25 NA O.munupusly pumped well
NC = Not Calculated
TWN-2, TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-25 are continuously pumping wells.
Piezometers I, 2, and 3 were not pumped, only one set of parameters were taken.
TWN-3 and TWN-7 were pumped dry and sampled after recovery.
Conduttivity RPD
2175 NC
701 NC
2943 NC
854.0 856.0 0.23 7.20
3578 NC
2485.0 2476.0 0.36 7.22
1056.0 1057.0 0.09 7.18
1194.0 1200.0 0.50 7.14
2210.0 2218.0 0.36 6.85
6383 NC
8024 NC
2759 NC
PH RED Temp RPD Red8x Potential RPD Turbiaity RPD
8.73 NC 13.40 NC 327 NC 9.0 NC
7.45 NC 13.47 NC 290 NC 6.5 NC
11.60 NC 13.51 NC 237 NC 9.6 NC
7.26 0.83 14.61 14.68 0.48 335 I 330 1.50 56 I 59 5.22
6.63 NC 13.51 NC 320 NC 0 NC
7.19 0.42 14.50 14.47 0.21 NM NC NM NC
7.18 0.00 14.44 14.44 0.00 296 I 292 1.36 316.0 1 325.0 2.81
7.12 0.28 14.29 14.31 0.14 NM NC NM NC
6.85 0.00 14.36 14.40 0.28 299 I 299 0.00 1048.o I 1059.0 1.04
6.93 NC 15.41 NC 242 NC 0 NC
6.85 NC 15.11 NC 250 NC 0 NC
7.09 NC 16.55 NC 269 NC 0 NC
The QAP states that turbidity should be less than 5 Nephelometric Turbidity Units ("NTU") prior to sampling unless the well is characterized by water that has a higher turbidity. The QAP does not require that turbidity measurements be less than 5 NTU prior to sampling.
As such, the noted observations regarding turbidity measLirements less than 5 NTU below are included for information purposes only.
NM =Not Measured. The QAP does not require the measurement of redox potential or turbidity in wells that were purged to dryness.
H-2: Holding Time Evaluation
Hold Time Allowed Hold Hold Time
Location ID Parameter Name Sample Date Analysis Date (Days) Time (Days) Check
PIEZ-01 Chloride 10116/2013 10/21/2013 5 28 OK
PIEZ-01 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10/16/2013 10/22/2013 6 28 OK
PIEZ-02 Chloride 10/16/2013 10/22/2013 6 28 OK
PIEZ-02 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10/16/2013 10/22/2013 6 28 OK
PIEZ-03 Chloride 10/16/2013 10122/2013 6 28 OK
PIEZ-03 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10/16/2013 10/22/2013 6 28 OK
TWN-01 Chloride 10/16/2013 10/21/2013 5 28 OK
TWN-01 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10116/2013 10/22/2013 6 28 OK
TWN-02 Chloride 10/16/2013 10/21/2013 5 28 OK
TWN-02 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10/16/2013 10/22/2013 6 28 OK
TWN-03 Chloride 10/17/2013 10/21/2013 4 28 OK
TWN-03 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10117/2013 10/22/2013 5 28 OK
TWN-04 Chloride 10116/2013 10/21/2013 5 28 OK
TWN-04 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10116/2013 10/2212013 6 28 OK
TWN-07 Chloride 10/16/2013 10/21/2013 5 28 OK
TWN-07 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10/16/2013 10/22/2013 6 28 OK
TWN-07R Chloride 10115/2013 10/21/2013 6 28 OK
TWN-07R Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10115/2013 10/22/2013 7 28 OK
TWN-18 Chloride 10/16/2013 10/21/2013 5 28 OK
TWN-18 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10116/2013 10/22/2013 6 28 OK
TW4-22 Chloride 10/29/2013 1113/2013 5 28 OK
TW4-22 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10/29/2013 11/5/2013 7 28 OK
TW4-24 Chloride 10/29/2013 1113/2013 5 28 OK
TW4-24 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10/29/2013 11/5/2013 7 28 OK
TW4-25 Chloride 10/29/2013 11/3/2013 5 28 OK
TW4-25 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10/29/2013 11/5/2013 7 28 OK
TW4-60 Chloride 11114/2013 11/22/2013 8 28 OK
TW4-60 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 11/14/2013 11/15/2013 1 28 OK
TWN-60 Chloride 10/17/2013 10/21/2013 4 28 OK
TWN-60 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10/17/2013 10/22/2013 5 28 OK
TWN-65 Chloride 10/16/2013 10/21/2013 5 28 OK
TWN-65 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10/16/2013 10/22/2013 6 28 OK
H-3: Analytical Method Check
"Par~ Method Method Ufwd by Lab
Nitrate E353.1 or E353 .2 E353.2
A4500-CI B or A4500-CI E
Chloride or£300.0 E300.0
Both Nitrate and Chloride were analyzed with the correct analytical method.
-cportm~ JIDJt ec H 4 R L' . Ch k
Required
111 Lab Reporting Reporting
Location ·AnlllyJ,c Limit Units Qualifier Limit Units RLCheck
PIEZ-01 Chloride 10 mg!L 1 mg/L OK
PIEZ-01 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) I mg/L O.I mg!L OK
PIEZ-02 Chloride 5 mg!L I mg!l OK
PIEZ-02 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) O.I mg/L O.I mg!L OK
PIEZ-03 Chloride 5 mg/L 1 mg!L OK
PIEZ-03 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L O.I mg!L OK
TWN-OI Chloride 5 mg!L 1 mg/L OK
TWN-OI Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.5 mg!L 0.1 mg/L OK
TWN-02 Chloride 10 mg!L 1 mg/L OK
TWN-02 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10 mg!L O.I mg!L OK
TWN-03 Chloride 50 mg/L 1 mg!L OK
TWN-03 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 2 mg/L 0.1 mg!L OK
TWN-04 Chloride 5 mg!L 1 m_g!L OK
TWN-04 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.5 mg!L 0.1 mg/L OK
TWN-07 Chloride I mg!L 1 mg!L OK
TWN-07 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg!L O.I mg_IL OK
TWN-07R Chloride I mg_IL u 1 mg!L OK
TWN-07R Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L u 0.1 mg/L OK
TWN-18 Chloride 10 mg!L 1 mg/L OK
TWN-18 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.5 mg!L 0.1 mg!L OK
TW4-22 Chloride 100 mg!L 1 mg/L OK
TW4-22 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10 mg!L 0.1 mg/L OK
TW4-24 Chloride 100 mg/L 1 mg/L OK
TW4-24 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10 mg!L 0.1 mg!L OK
TW4-25 Chloride 50 mg/L 1 mg!L OK
TW4-25 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1 mg/L 0.1 mg!L OK
TW4-60 Chloride I mg/L u 1 mg!L OK
TW4-60 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg!L u O.I mg/L OK
TWN-60 Chloride 1 mg/L u 1 mg!L OK
TWN-60 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L u 0.1 mg!L OK
TWN-65 Chloride 5 mg/L 1 mg!L OK
TWN-65 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) O.I mt:ll O.I mg!L OK
U = Value was reported by the laboratory as nondetect.
H-5 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
CoJ\Stituent 'fWNo(Jl TWN-6.5 %'RPD
Chloride 28.6 27.1 5.39
Nitrogen 1.61 1.48 8.41
H-6 QC Control Limits for Analysis and Blanks
Method Blank Detections
All Method Blanks for the quarter were non-detect.
Matrix Soike% Recovcrv C -~·-· -------
REC
Lab Report Lab Sample ID Well Analyte MS %REC MSD%REC Range RPD
1311306 1311306-001BMS TW4-06 Nitrate 89.2 97.6 90-110 10.4
1311306 1311306-007BMS TW4-07 Nitrate 113 110 90-110 15.4
Laboratory Control Sample
All Laboratory Control Samples were within acceptance limits for the quarter.
. T H-7 Hcc-cipl ¢mperarure EvaluatiOn
Saml)le Batilh Well$; h-. Dafc.1h Tfln»eral'lire
1310396 Piezometer 1, Piezometer 2, Piezometer 3, TWN-1, TWN-2, 1.4°C TWN-3, TWN-4, TWN-7, TWN-18, TWN-60, TWN-65
1310621 TW4-22, TW4-24. TW4-25 0.9 oc
1311306 TW4-60 4.8 oc
H-8 Rinsate Evaluation
All Rinsate and DI Blank samples were non-detect for the quarter.
Tab I
Kriged Current Quarter Isoconcentration Maps
NS =not sampled; ND =not detected
......_10
MW-4
e s.3
TW4-1
0 7.1
TWN-1
¢1.6
PIEZ-1
Q 6.7
TW4-32
~4.3
kriged nitrate isocon and label
perched monitoring well showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched monitoring well
showing concentration in mg/L
temporary perched nitrate monitoring
well showing concentration in mg/L
perched piezometer showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched monitoring well
installed September, 2013 showing
concentration in mg/L
NOTE: MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19, and TW4-20 are chloroform pumping wells; TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 are nitrate pumping wells
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
KRIGED 4th QUARTER, 2013 NITRATE (mg/L)
(NITRATE + NITRITE AS N)
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE REFERENCE FIGURE
H:/718000/feb14/nitrate/Unt1213.srf I I -1
NS = not sampled; ND = not detected
......_ 100 ktiged chloride isooon ar:~d label
MW-4
.40
TW4-1
0 37
TWN-1
~27
PIEZ-1
g 54
TW4-32
~52
perched monitoring well showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched monitoring well
showing concentration in mg/L
temporary perched nitrate monitoring
well showing concentration in mg/L
perched piezometer showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched monitoring well
installed September, 2013 showing
concentration in mg/L
NOTE: MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19, and TW4-20 are chloroform pumping wells; TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 are nitrate pumping wells
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
KRIGED 4th QUARTER, 2013 CHLORIDE (mg/L)
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE fii:Ff;RENCE I FIGURE
H:/718000/feb14/chloride/Ucl1213.srf I-2
TabJ
Analyte Concentrations Over Time
Piezometer 1
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/19/2009 6.8 NA
7/14/2009 6.8 60
9/22/2009 7.3 78
10/27/2009 7.4 61
6/2/2010 7.2 52
7/19/2010 6.8 52
12/10/2010 6.5 60
1/31/2011 7 60
4/25/2011 6.8 58
7/25/2011 7 53
10/19/2011 6.6 55
1/11/2012 7.1 78
4/20/2012 6.6 58
7/27/2012 7.2 56
10/17/2012 7.66 55
2/18/2013 8.11 56.7
4/24/2013 8.88 53.3
8/28/2013 7.83 55.1
10/16/2013 6.68 54.1
Piezometer 2
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/19/2009 0.5 NA
7/14/2009 0.5 7
9/22/2009 0.5 17
10/27/2009 0.6 7
6/2/2010 0.6 8
7/19/2010 0.6 8
12/10/2010 0.2 6
1/31/2011 0.3 9
4/25/2011 0.3 8
7/25/2011 0.1 9
10/19/2011 0.1 8
1/11/2012 0.1 9
4/20/2012 0.2 8
7/27/2012 0.2 9
10/17/2012 0.192 9.5
2/19/2013 0.218 9.67
4/24/2013 0.172 10.3
8/28/2013 0.198 9.66
10/16/2013 0.364 9.22
Piezometer 3
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/19/2009 0.7 NA
7/14/2009 0.8 12
9/22/2009 0.8 24
10/27/2009 1.2 19
3/24/2010 1.7 116
6/2/2010 1.6 36
7/19/2010 1.6 35
12/10/2010 1.8 25
1/31/2011 1.8 40
4/25/2011 1.7 35
7/25/2011 1.8 61
10/19/2011 1.7 12
1/11/2012 1.8 20
4/20/2012 1.7 53
7/27/2012 1.8 21
10/17/2012 2.75 20.1
2/19/2013 1.85 21
4/24/2013 1.83 21.2
8/28/2013 1.81 22.4
10/16/2013 1.80 23.5
TWN-1
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/6/2009 0.7 19
7/21/2009 0.4 17
9/21/2009 0.4 19
10/28/2009 0.5 18
3/17/2010 0.5 17
5/26/2010 0.6 20
9/27/2010 0.6 19
12/7/2010 0.6 14
1/26/2011 0.5 17
4/20/2011 0.5 19
7/26/2011 0.5 14
10/17/2011 0.5 10
1/9/2012 0.6 15
4/18/2012 0.6 17
7/24/2012 0.6 17
10/15/2012 0.432 17.5
2/18/2013 0.681 17.6
4/23/2013 0.84 17.4
8/27/2013 1.24 24.1
10/16/2013 1.61 26.8
TWN-2
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/6/2009 25.4 29
7/21/2009 25 25
9/21/2009 22.6 17
11/2/2009 20.8 55
3/24/2010 62.1 85
6/2/2010 69 97
9/29/2010 69 104
12/9/2010 48 93
2/1/2011 43 93
4/28/2011 40 85
7/28/2011 33 74
10/20/2011 33 76
1/12/2012 31 86
4/20/2012 48 103
7/31/2012 54 93
10/17/2012 22.1 79
2/19/2013 57.3 80.5
4/24/2013 57.7 82.1
8/27/2013 80 75.9
10/16/2013 111 70.4
TWN-3
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/6/2009 23.6 96
7/21/2009 25.3 96
9/21/2009 27.1 99
11/2/2009 29 106
3/25/2010 25.3 111
6/3/2010 26 118
7/15/2010 27 106
12/10/2010 24 117
2/1/2011 24 138
4/28/2011 26 128
7/29/2011 25 134
10/20/2011 25 129
1/12/2012 25 143
4/20/2012 24 152
7/31/2012 27 158
10/17/2012 12.1 149
2/19/2013 22.2 157
4/24/2013 27.2 158
8/28/2013 20.9 171
10/17/2013 23.5 163
TWN-4
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/6/2009 1 13
7/21/2009 0.05 12
9/21/2009 0.4 13
10/28/2009 0.4 11
3/16/2010 0.9 22
5/27/2010 1.0 22
9/27/2010 0.9 19
12/8/2010 1 21
1/25/2011 0.9 21
4/20/2011 0.9 21
7/26/2011 1.1 35
10/18/2011 0.9 20
1/9/2012 0.9 20
4/18/2012 1.1 24
7/25/2012 1.4 25
10/15/2012 1.45 26.4
2/18/2013 1.51 25.3
4/23/2013 1.63 24.4
8/27/2013 1.58 27.2
10/16/2013 1.69 29.4
TWN-7
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
8/25/2009 ND 11
9/21/2009 ND 7
11/10/2009 0.1 7
3/17/2010 0.8 6
5/28/2010 1.2 6
7/14/2010 1.6 7
12/10/2010 1 4
1/27/2011 1.3 6
4/21/2011 1.7 6
7/29/2011 0.7 5
10/19/2011 2.2 6
1/11/2012 2.3 5
4/20/2012 1.2 6
7/26/2012 0.9 6
10/16/2012 0.641 5.67
2/19/2013 0.591 5.68
4/24/2013 1.16 5.88
8/28/2013 0.835 6.96
10/16/2013 0.986 5.70
TWN-18
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
11/2/2009 1.3 57
3/17/2010 1.6 42
6/1/2010 1.8 63
9/27/2010 1.8 64
12/9/2010 1.6 59
1/27/2011 1.4 61
4/26/2011 1.8 67
7/28/2011 1.8 65
10/18/2011 1.9 60
1/10/2012 1.9 64
4/19/2012 2.1 64
7/26/2012 2.3 67
10/16/2012 1.95 67.5
2/18/2013 2.27 68.7
4/23/2013 2.32 64.3
8/27/2013 2.04 70.4
10/16/2013 2.15 67.3
TW4-19
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
7/22/2002 42.80 12/7/2005 81
9/12/2002 47.60 3/9/2006 86
3/28/2003 61.40 7/20/2006 123
6/23/2003 11.40 11/9/2006 134
7/15/2003 6.80 2/28/2007 133
8/15/2003 4.00 8/15/2007 129
9/12/2003 5.70 10/10/2007 132
9/25/2003 9.20 3/26/2008 131
10/29/2003 7.70 6/25/2008 128
11/9/2003 4.80 9/10/2008 113
8/16/2004 9.91 10/15/2008 124
9/17/2004 4.50 3/4/2009 127
3/16/2005 5.30 6/23/2009 132
6/7/2005 5.70 9/14/2009 43
8/31/2005 4.60 12/14/2009 124
12/1/2005 0.10 2/17/2010 144
3/9/2006 4.00 6/9/2010 132
6/14/2006 5.20 8/16/2010 142
7/20/2006 4.30 10/11/2010 146
11/9/2006 4.60 2/17/2011 135
2/28/2007 4.00 6/7/2011 148
8/15/2007 4.10 8/17/2011 148
10/10/2007 4.00 11/17/2011 148
3/26/2008 2.20 1/23/2012 138
6/25/2008 2.81 6/6/2012 149
9/10/2008 36.20 9/5/2012 149
10/15/2008 47.80 10/3/2012 150
3/4/2009 3.20 2/11/2013 164
6/23/2009 2.40 6/5/2013 148
9/14/2009 0.10 9/3/2013 179
12/14/2009 26.70 10/29/2013 206
2/17/2010 2.00
6/9/2010 4.40
8/16/2010 5.90
10/11/2010 2.70
2/17/2011 17.00
6/7/2011 12.00
8/17/2011 3.00
11/17/2011 5.00
1/23/2012 0.60
6/6/2012 2.40
9/5/2012 2.50
10/3/2012 4.10
2/11/2013 7.99
6/5/2013 2.95
9/3/2013 17.60
10/29/2013 4.70
The sampling program for TW4-19 was updated in the fourth quarter of 2005
to include analysis for chloride as well as nitrate. This change accounts for the
different number of data points represented above.
TW4-21
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
5/25/2005 14.6 12/7/2005 353
8/31/2005 10.1 3/9/2006 347
11/30/2005 9.6 7/20/2006 357
3/9/2006 8.5 11/8/2006 296
6/14/2006 10.2 2/28/2007 306
7/20/2006 8.9 6/27/2007 327
11/8/2006 8.7 8/15/2007 300
2/28/2007 8.7 10/10/2007 288
6/27/2007 8.6 3/26/2008 331
8/15/2007 8.6 6/25/2008 271
10/10/2007 8.3 9/10/2008 244
3/26/2008 14.3 10/15/2008 284
6/25/2008 8.8 3/11/2009 279
9/10/2008 7.6 6/24/2009 291
10/15/2008 8.0 9/15/2009 281
3/11/2009 8.3 12/22/2009 256
6/24/2009 8.1 2/25/2010 228
9/15/2009 9.2 6/10/2010 266
12/22/2009 8.4 8/12/2010 278
2/25/2010 8.4 10/13/2010 210
6/10/2010 12.0 2/22/2011 303
8/12/2010 14.0 6/1/2011 297
10/13/2010 7.0 8/17/2011 287
2/22/2011 9.0 11/16/2011 276
6/1/2011 13.0 1/19/2012 228
8/17/2011 14.0 6/13/2012 285
11/16/2011 13.0 9/13/2012 142
1/19/2012 15.0 10/4/2012 270
6/13/2012 11.0 2/13/2013 221
9/13/2012 13.0 6/18/2013 243
10/4/2012 14.0 9/12/2013 207
2/13/2013 11.8 11/13/2013 206
6/18/2013 13.8
9/12/2013 10.3
11/13/2013 9.0
The sampling program for TW4-21 was updated in the fourth quarter of 2005
to include analysis for chloride as well as nitrate. This change accounts for the
different number of data points represented above.
TW4-22
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/28/2007 20.9 347
6/27/2007 19.3 273
8/15/2007 19.3 259
10/10/2007 18.8 238
3/26/2008 39.1 519
6/25/2008 41.9 271
9/10/2008 38.7 524
10/15/2008 36.3 539
3/11/2009 20.7 177
6/24/2009 20.6 177
9/15/2009 40.3 391
12/29/2009 17.8 175
3/3/2010 36.6 427
6/15/2010 19 134
8/12/2010 18 127
8/24/2010 15 130
10/13/2010 16 134
2/23/2011 18 114
6/1/2011 17 138
8/17/2011 15 120
11/16/2011 19 174
1/19/2012 14 36
6/13/2012 12.8 35
9/12/2012 7 121
10/4/2012 14 130
2/11/2013 58 635
6/5/2013 50.2 586
9/3/2013 29.7 487
10/29/2013 45.2 501
TW4-24
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
6/27/2007 26.1 770
8/15/2007 29 791
10/10/2007 24.7 692
3/26/2008 24.4 740
6/25/2008 45.3 834
9/10/2008 38.4 1180
10/15/2008 44.6 1130
3/4/2009 30.5 1010
6/24/2009 30.4 759
9/15/2009 30.7 618
12/17/2009 28.3 1080
2/25/2010 33.1 896
6/9/2010 30 639
8/11/2010 32 556
8/24/2010 31 587
10/6/2010 31 522
2/17/2011 31 1100
5/26/2011 35 1110
8/17/2011 34 967
11/16/2011 35 608
1/18/2012 37 373
6/6/2012 37 355
8/30/2012 37 489
10/3/2012 38 405
2/11/2013 35.9 1260
6/5/2013 23.7 916
9/3/2013 32.6 998
10/29/2013 34.6 1030
TW4-25
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1) Notes
6/27/2007 17.1 395
8/15/2007 16.7 382
10/10/2007 17 356
3/26/2008 18.7 374
6/25/2008 22.1 344
9/10/2008 18.8 333
10/15/2008 21.3 366
3/4/2009 15.3 332
6/24/2009 15.3 328
9/15/2009 3.3 328
12/16/2009 14.2 371
2/23/2010 14.4 296
6/8/2010 16 306
8/10/2010 14 250
10/5/2010 15 312
2/16/2011 15 315
5/25/2011 16 321
8/16/2011 16 276
11/15/2011 16 294
1/18/2012 16 304
5/31/2012 16 287
9/11/2012 17 334
10/3/2012 17 338
2/11/2013 9.04 190
6/5/2013 5.24 136
9/3/2013 5.69 119
10/29/2013 6.10 88.6
MW-30
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
6/22/2005 12.4 6/22/2005 125
9/22/2005 12.8 9/22/2005 125
12/14/2005 13.6 12/14/2005 128
3/22/2006 13.8 3/22/2006 125
6/21/2006 14.5 6/21/2006 124
9/13/2006 14.1 9/13/2006 118
10/25/2006 14.6 10/25/2006 124
3/15/2007 14.4 3/15/2007 125
8/22/2007 14.6 8/22/2007 126
10/24/2007 14.9 10/24/2007 122
3/19/2008 14.8 3/19/2008 118
6/3/2008 18.7 6/3/2008 125
8/4/2008 17.3 8/4/2008 121
11/5/2008 15.6 11/5/2008 162
2/3/2009 15.3 2/3/2009 113
5/13/2009 15.1 5/13/2009 122
8/24/2009 20.9 8/24/2009 118
10/14/2009 15.0 10/14/2009 129
1/20/2010 15.4 1/20/2010 106
2/9/2010 16.1 2/9/2010 127
4/27/2010 15.8 4/27/2010 97
5/24/2010 17.0 9/14/2010 111
6/15/2010 15.3 11/9/2010 126
8/24/2010 16.0 2/1/2011 134
9/14/2010 15.0 4/11/2011 134
10/19/2010 15.0 5/10/2011 128
11/9/2010 15.0 6/20/2011 127
12/14/2010 16.0 7/5/2011 127
1/10/2011 15.0 8/3/2011 126
2/1/2011 16.0 9/7/2011 145
3/14/2011 17.0 10/4/2011 129
4/11/2011 16.0 11/8/2011 122
5/10/2011 16.0 12/12/2011 124
6/20/2011 17.0 1/24/2012 124
7/5/2011 17.0 2/14/2012 126
8/3/2011 14.0 3/14/2012 128
9/7/2011 16.0 4/10/2012 128
10/4/2011 16.0 5/2/2012 124
11/8/2011 16.0 6/18/2012 131
12/12/2011 16.0 7/10/2012 128
1/24/2012 17.0 8/7/2012 139
2/14/2012 17.0 9/19/2012 130
3/14/2012 18.0 10/23/2012 135
4/10/2012 17.0 11/13/2012 114
5/2/2012 16.0 12/26/2012 122
MW-30
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
6/18/2012 15.0 1/23/2013 128
7/10/2012 17.0 2/26/2013 129
8/7/2012 18.0 3/20/2013 126
9/19/2012 16.0 4/17/2013 117
10/23/2012 16.2 5/15/2013 119
11/13/2012 18.5 6/25/2013 127
12/26/2012 17.2 7/10/2013 130
1/23/2013 19.2 8/20/2013 126
2/26/2013 21.4 9/18/2013 131
3/20/2013 14.3 10/22/2013 128
4/17/2013 16.8 11/20/2013 124
5/15/2013 18.8 12/18/2013 134
6/25/2013 16.1
7/10/2013 17.6
8/20/2013 16.4
9/18/2013 16.9
10/22/2013 19.7
11/20/2013 19.5
12/18/2013 20.7
Under the groundwater sampling progran, accelerated monitoring for nitrate began in MW-
30 prior to when the accelerated monitoring for chloride began . This difference accounts for
the different number of data points represented above.
MW-31
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
6/22/2005 24.2 6/22/2005 139
9/22/2005 22.4 9/22/2005 136
12/14/2005 23.8 12/14/2005 135
3/22/2006 24.1 3/22/2006 133
6/21/2006 25.3 6/21/2006 138
9/13/2006 24.6 9/13/2006 131
10/25/2006 25.1 10/25/2006 127
3/15/2007 23.2 3/15/2007 132
3/15/2007 22.0 3/15/2007 132
8/27/2007 23.3 8/27/2007 136
10/24/2007 24.6 10/24/2007 122
3/19/2008 25.0 3/19/2008 124
6/3/2008 29.3 6/3/2008 128
8/4/2008 28.7 8/4/2008 124
11/11/2008 29.9 11/11/2008 119
2/3/2009 23.4 2/3/2009 115
5/13/2009 22.4 5/13/2009 124
8/24/2009 15.4 8/24/2009 122
10/14/2009 22.6 10/14/2009 138
2/9/2010 21.7 2/9/2010 128
4/20/2010 22.5 4/20/2010 128
5/21/2010 23.0 9/13/2010 139
6/15/2010 21.1 11/9/2010 138
8/24/2010 22.0 2/1/2011 145
9/13/2010 21.0 4/1/2011 143
10/19/2010 20.0 5/10/2011 143
11/9/2010 20.0 6/20/2011 145
12/14/2010 20.0 7/5/2011 148
1/10/2011 19.0 8/2/2011 148
2/1/2011 21.0 9/6/2011 148
3/14/2011 22.0 10/3/2011 145
4/1/2011 21.0 11/8/2011 145
5/10/2011 20.0 12/12/2011 148
6/20/2011 22.0 1/24/2012 155
7/5/2011 22.0 2/13/2012 150
8/2/2011 20.0 3/13/2012 152
9/6/2011 21.0 4/9/2012 160
10/3/2011 21.0 5/2/2012 151
11/8/2011 21.0 6/18/2012 138
12/12/2011 21.0 7/9/2012 161
1/24/2012 21.0 8/6/2012 175
2/13/2012 21.0 9/18/2012 172
3/13/2012 22.0 10/22/2012 157
4/9/2012 21.0 11/6/2012 189
5/2/2012 20.0 12/18/2012 170
MW-31
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
6/18/2012 21.6 1/22/2013 176
7/9/2012 21.0 2/19/2013 174
8/6/2012 21.0 3/19/2013 168
9/18/2012 21.0 4/16/2013 171
10/22/2012 18.0 5/13/2013 169
11/6/2012 23.6 6/24/2013 179
12/18/2012 22.2 7/9/2013 182
1/22/2013 22.8 8/19/2013 183
2/19/2013 19.3 9/17/2013 193
3/19/2013 19.1 10/23/2013 188
4/16/2013 18.8 11/18/2013 174
5/13/2013 23.8 12/17/2013 203
6/24/2013 20.0
7/9/2013 21.7
8/19/2013 16.0
9/17/2013 21.2
10/23/2013 21.2
11/18/2013 23.9
12/17/2013 24.2
Under the groundwater sampling progran, accelerated monitoring for nitrate
began in MW-31 prior to when the accelerated monitoring for chloride began.
This difference accounts for the different number of data points represented
above.
TabK
Concentration Trend Graphs
1/)
~ 0 --;
1lo. -~ Q) u ~ 0 0
.! ca 1lo. .t: z
"'"" 1lo. Q) a;
E 0 .~ c..
<
0 ,.-
~ ~
!
1\ > 4 > ~
~
~
,
~,
'
~
v~-unr
. 8~-AON
8 ~ -liBV\1
~~-des
o ~ -onv
o~-uer
. 60-lnr
so-oaa
so-unr
CD LO C\J 0
(1J6W)
en c 0 :;; ca .... -c
Cl)
(J c 0 0
Cl)
"C
'i:
0
.c
0 ,... ....
Cl) -Cl)
E 0 N .!!!
Q.
0 0> 0 CXl
<
~
~
··~
~
1
~
~ ~
~
0
~
.l
v .......4
~~
0 co 0 0
L{) "'" (1J6W)
0 C\J 0 ,-
-
-
-
0
v~-unr
8 ~-/\ON
8 ~ -ABV\1
~~-des
o ~-Bnv
o~-uer
so-oaa
fl) c 0 ;
Jo.. -c
Cl)
(.) c 0 0
Cl) -ca Jo.. ~ z
N
Jo..
Cl) a;
E
0 N Cl)
c..
~ ------
~
...._
~~
<0
0
~
I!)
0
.....
------
(1J6w)
....... \ ~
~
~.
H
~
~~
~~
(\J
0
,.....
0
17~-unr
" £~-AON
£ ~-ABII'J
~ ~-das
o~-6nv
o~-uer
6o-1nr
-so-oaa
so-unr
0
0 c
0 ~ -c Cl)
(.) c
0 0
Cl)
"'C 'i: _g
.c
0
N
""" Cl)
G)
E 0 N Cl)
0:
co C\J
T"" T""
v
~ ~
\.
<.
~
~
v·
~
\
'"'
...
0 (!)
(1/6W)
v~-unr
8 ~-AON
~~-des
o ~ -onv
o~-uer
-
ao-oaa
0
Ill
s:::: 0 ·.;:: ca .... ...
s:::: Cl) u
s:::: 0 0
Cl) ... ca .... .1:::: z
(W) .... Cl) ... Cl)
E 0 N Cl)
ii:
~-------r--------.-------~--------.-------~---------.v~-unr
-8 ~-AON
-c:a-Jd'v'
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.:l
o ~ -onv
o~-uer
eo-oaa
~-------r--------+--------+--------+-------~--------~Bo-unr
(\J
(1/6W)
l[)
0 0
tn s::::
0 '+=i cu ... -s:::: Cl) c.>
s:::: 0 (.)
Cl)
"C 'i:
0
.s:::: (.)
CW) ...
Cl) -Cl)
E 0 N .! ll.
~------~----~------~------~------~------~------~v~-unr
8 ~-/\ON
8 ~-ABV\1
· c~-PO
G ~ -Jd'v'
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.:J
o ~ -onv
-0~-uer
6o-1nr
t.-------l~-----l-------+--------l--------4--------+--------+. ao-~aa
0
""' ,..-
0 C\1 0 0 ,..-
0 00
(1J6W)
0 <0 0
""'
0 C\1 0
tn c 0 ·~
1: C1) u c 0 0
~ :t::: z ,....
I z ~
4~ ~ "' ~
" ~
(X)
0
(1/6W)
~
~
•
~
~
~~
/
v~
co
0
C\J 0 0
17~-unr
8~-AON
8 ~-ABV\1
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.:J
o~-Bnv
o~-uer
eo-1nr
so-oaa
so-unr
tn 1: 0 ·:::; m llo. -1: Cl) u 1: 0 0
Cl)
"tJ 'i:
.2 J:
0 ,..
I z
3: 1-
~------~--------~------~----------------~---------r v~-unr
8 ~-AON
8 ~ -fiBV\1
6 ~ -JdV
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa::i
o ~ -Bnv
o~-uer
~-------+--------+--------4--------4--------4---------+so-unr
0 ('I)
Li)
C\J 0 C\J 0
(1/6W)
rn
s::::: 0 ; ca ... -s::::: Q) u
s::::: 0 (.)
Q) -ca ... :t::: z
~ z 3: 1-
~-------.---------r--------.---------.--------.---------.v~-unr
8 ~-AON
G ~ -Jd'v'
~ ~-das
~ ~ -qa:J
. o~-onv
o~-uer
-6o-1nr
so-oaa
~-------+--------+-------~--------4-------~---------+Bo-unr
0 (\j 0 0 ...-
0 a:> 0 <0
(1J6W)
0 (\j 0
1/)
t: 0 ... ca ... -t:
C1) u t: 0 0
C1)
"C "i:
0
.c
0
N I z ~
r-------~---------.--------.---------r-------~---------r v~-unr
8~-AON
c ~ -JdV
~ ~-das
-~ ~-qa.:J
o ~ -5nv
o~-uer
5o-1nr
so-oaa
~-------+--------+--------+--------~------~--------4 80-unr
0 N
T"""
0 0 0 co 0 CD
(1J6W)
0 N 0
"' t: 0 :;:; ca .... -t: C1) u
t:
0 0
C1) -ca ....
:!::::: z
C")
I z
3: 1-
~------r-------~------.-------,-------~-------r-------r v~-unr
8 ~-/\ON
c ~ -Jdy
-~ ~-das
-~ ~-qa~
o ~-5ny
o ~-uer
so-::>ao
~----~~----~------~-------+-------r------~-------+80-unr
U')
('I)
U')
C\J 0 C\J
U') 0
(1f6W)
VI s::: 0 ·.;::o cu I.. -s::: Cl)
C.> s::: 0 0
Cl)
'C 'i: 0
.s::. 0
('I)
I z
== 1-
~----~----~----~----~----~------r-----~----~-----r v~-unr
-8~-AON
c ~ -Jd'Q'
.. ~~-des
• ~ ~-qa.:J
N-5ny
o ~-uer
· 60·1nr
~----~----+-----+-----+-----~----~----~----~-----+90-unr
0 co
T""
0 CD 0 C\J 0 0
T""
0 co
(1J6W)
0 CD 0 '<:1" 0 C\1 0
tn c 0
+:0 cu "--c Cl)
(,) c 0 (.)
Cl) -cu "-.'!:::: z
-.:t I z 3: t-
~----~----~-----r----~----~~----~----~----~-----r v~-unr
8 ~-AON
<:: ~ -JdV
-~~-des
~ ~-qa.:J
o ~ -5nv
o ~-uer
6o-1nr
so-oaa
~----+-----+-----+-----4-----4-----4-----4-----4------+so-unr
.,..... <Xl
0
(1t6w)
(!)
0 "!
0
0
en c 0 '+=i ctl ... .... c
Cl)
(,) c 0 (.)
Cl)
"C 'i:
0
.c
(.)
"':t I z ~ 1-
~-----.------~----~------~-----,------~----~r------r v~-unr
8~·AON
• G ~ -Jd'v'
~ ~-das
~ ~ -qa.:J
o ~ -onv
o~·uBr
-60·1nr
so-oaa
~----~-----4------+------+------+-----~----~~----+so-unr
0 (t) LO C\1 0 C\1
{1t6w)
LO 0 LO 0 ,..... ,.....
~---------r----------.----------.----------r----------r v~-unr
£~-/\ON
£ ~-AeV\1
c~-PO
en c 0
'.j:i
G ~-Jd'v' ctl ""' ... c Cl)
(,) c 0 0
Cl) ~ ~-das ... ctl ""' .'!:::: z
r-.. I z ~ 1-~ ~-qa.:J
-oH>nv
o ~-u-er
1------4-------4------+------+------t-5o-1nr
It) 0
c:i
r--------T--------~-------.--------,--------,--------~v~-unr
£~-AON
-£ ~-keV\1
tn
r::::: G ~ -Jd'v' 0
+:0 m 1.. -r:::::
Cl)
(,)
r::::: ~ ~-das 0 0
Cl)
"'C
'i: 0
J:
0 -~ ~-qa.::l
....... I z
3: 1-
-o ~ -Bnv
. 0~-u-er
6o-1nr
~------~--------+--------+--------+--------4--------+so-oaa
(\J 0 (\J 0 ,..-
(1f6W)
U)
s:::: 0 '+" cu :r.. -s::::
Cl)
()
s:::: 0 0
Cl) -cu :r.. :!::::: z
co ,....
I z s: 1-
r---------~----------r---------~----------r---------~v~-unr
-8~-AON
8 ~-ABV\1
c~-PO
c ~ -Jd'v'
. ~ ~-das
~ ~ -qa.:J
o ~ -Bnv
-okuer
1----------r------+--------if--------+------1-eo-1nr
C\1
(1J6W)
l.()
ci
0
In c: 0 ·.; m to.. -c:
C1)
0 c: 0 0
C1)
"0 ·.::::
..2 .c:
0
co ,....
I z ~
r------r-----,.-----.-----~------.-----~------~-----r v~-unr
8~-AON
8 ~-ABII'J
c~-PO
• G ~ -Jd'v'
-~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.::l
o ~ -Bnv
o ~-uer
1-----+-----+------l------+-----l-------4----l----+ 5o-1nr
0 ro 0 CD 0 It) 0
""" (1/6W)
0 C\J 0 0
0 0 0
7/1/2002
11/1/2002
3/1/2003
7/1/2003
11/1/2003
3/1/2004
7/1/2004
11/1/2004
3/1/2005
7/1/2005
11/1/2005
3/1/2006
7/1/2006
11/1/2006
3/1/2007
7/1/2007 -
11/1/2007
3/1/2008
7/1/2008
11/1/2008
3/1/2009
7/1/2009 -
11/1/2009
3/1/2010
7/1/2010
11/1/2010
3/1/2011
7/1/2011
11/1/2011
3/1/2012
7/1/2012
11/1/2012
3/1/2013
7/1/2013
~ 0 8
N 0 0 0
w 0
0 0
,f::o.
0
0 0
VI 0
0 0
0"1 0
0 0
-..J 0 0 0
-1 ~ ~ I
~
\D
z -· ,..
~ QJ ,..
tD
n
0 ::::s n tD
::::s ,..
~ QJ ,.. -· 0
::::s
(I)
0
12/1/2005
3/1/2006
6/1/2006
9/1/2006
12/1/2006
3/1/2007
6/1/2007
9/1/2007
12/1/2007
3/1/2008
6/1/2008
9/1/2008
12/1/2008
3/1/2009
6/1/2009
9/1/2009
12/1/2009 -
3/1/2010
6/1/2010
9/1/2010 -
12/1/2010
3/1/2011
6/1/2011
9/1/2011
12/1/2011
3/1/2012
6/1/2012
9/1/2012
12/1/2012
3/1/2013
6/1/2013
9/1/2013
...... lJ1 0 0 0
...... lJ1 0
I'.J 0 0
I'.J lJ1 0
-4 ~ ~ I
~
\D
n :::r -0 .., -· a.
tD
n 0 :::s n tD :::s ....
Ql .... -· 0 :::s
"'
0 N -!:> CTl
0 0 0 0
5/1/2005
8/1/2005
11/1/2005
2/1/2006
5/1/2006
8/1/2006
11/1/2006
2/1/2007
5/1/2007
8/1/2007
11/1/2007 -
2/1/2008
5/1/2008
8/1/2008
11/1/2008
2/1/2009 -
5/1/2009
8/1/2009
11/1/2009
2/1/2010
5/1/2010
8/1/2010
11/1/2010
2/1/2011 .
5/1/2011
8/1/2011
11/1/2011
2/1/2012
5/1/2012
8/1/2012
11/1/2012
2/1/2013
5/1/2013
8/1/2013
11/1/2013
00 0
...... 0 0
...... N 0
...... -!:> 0
...... CTl 0
~ ~ I N .....
z -· r+ ... OJ r+ tD
n
0
::::s n tD
::::s r+ ... OJ r+ -· 0
::::s
U\
0
12/1/2005 -
3/1/2006
6/1/2006
9/1/2006
12/1/2006
3/1/2007 -
6/1/2007 .
9/1/2007
12/1/2007
3/1/2008 .
6/1/2008
9/1/2008
12/1/2008
3/1/2009
6/1/2009
9/1/2009
12/1/2009
3/1/2010
6/1/2010
9/1/2010
12/1/2010
3/1/2011
6/1/2011
9/1/2011
12/1/2011
3/1/2012
6/1/2012
9/1/2012
12/1/2012
3/1/2013
6/1/2013
9/1/2013
l.n 0
....... 0 0
....... l.n 0
N 0 0
N
l.n 0
w 0 0
w l.n 0
~ 0 0
-1 ~ ~ I
N .....
n ::r -0 .., -· a.
tD
n
0 :::J n
tD
:::J ,....
Ql ,.... -· 0
:::J
"'
.....
lia E
TW4-22 Nitrate Concentrations
70
60
so
40
30
20 t"--• • d I • v \.:: . • I
10
0
2/28/2007 2/29/2008 2/28/2009 2/28/2010 2/28/2011 2/29/2012 2/28/2013
"' c
0 ·-....,
rtJ .... ...., c cu u c
0 u
cu
"'C ·-....
0
..c u
N
N I lll::t s ....
0 0 I'-
0 0 1.0
0
0 Ll'l
0
0 o::t
1/SW
0 0
("(')
0 0 N
0 0 .-I
("(')
.-I
0 N ~ N -N
N .-I 0 N -(J)
N -N
.-I .-I 0 N -00 N -N
0 .-I 0 N -00 N -N
(J)
0 0 N -00 N -N
00 0 0 N -(J)
N -N
so
45
40
35
30
.....
liD 25 E
20
15
10
5
0
6/27/2007
TW4-24 Nitrate Concentrations
6/27/2008 6/27/2009 6/27/2010 6/27/2011 6/27/2012 6/27/2013
.....
bo E
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
6/27/2007
TW4-24 Chloride Concentrations
6/27/2008 6/27/2009 6/27/2010 6/27/2011 6/27/2012 6/27/2013
U') c
0 ·-....,
"' '-....,
c cu u c
0 u
cu ....,
"' '-...., ·-z
Ln N I q-s ....
Ll')
N 0 N
Ll')
.-f
1/SW
0
.-f
.-f .-f
0 N -I' N -1.0
0 .-f 0 N -I' N -1.0
0'1 0 0 N -I' N -1.0
00 0 0 N -I' N
U5"
I' 0 0 N -I' oN U5"
"' c
0 ·-+"' nJ ....
+"' c cv u c
0 u
cv
"'C ·-....
0
..c: u
Ln
N I q-s 1-
0 0 0 0
Lfl 0 Lfl 0 <:t <:t !"(') !"(')
0 0 0 0 Lfl 0 Lfl 0 N N .-i .-i
1/~W
0 0 Lfl
N .-i 0 N -r-. N ~
.-i .-i 0 N -r-. N -1.0
0 .-i 0 N -r-. N -1.0
O'l 0 0 N -r-. N -1.0
00 0 0 N r:::-
N ~
r-. 0 0 N -r-.
N -1.0
0 0
6/1/2005
9/1/2005
12/1/2005
3/1/2006
6/1/2006
9/1/2006
12/1/2006
3/1/2007
6/1/2007
9/1/2007
12/1/2007
3/1/2008
6/1/2008 -
9/1/2008
12/1/2008 ..
3/1/2009 ..
6/1/2009
9/1/2009
12/1/2009
3/1/2010
6/1/2010
9/1/2010
12/1/2010
3/1/2011 -
6/1/2011 ~
9/1/2011
12/1/2011
3/1/2012
6/1/2012 •.
9/1/2012
12/1/2012
3/1/2013
6/1/2013
9/1/2013
12/1/2013
V1
0
...... 0
0
...... V1
0
"-1 0
0
"-1 V1 0
~
:E I w 0 z -· r+
Ql r+ tt)
n 0
:::::s n tt)
:::::s r+
""' DJ r+ -· 0
:::::s
"'
0
6/1/2005
9/1/2005
12/1/2005
3/1/2006 .
6/1/2006
9/1/2006
12/1/2006 .
3/1/2007
6/1/2007
9/1/2007
12/1/2007
3/1/2008
6/1/2008
9/1/2008
12/1/2008
3/1/2009
6/1/2009
9/1/2009
12/1/2009
3/1/2010 -
6/1/2010
9/1/2010
12/1/2010 .
3/1/2011
6/1/2011 ~
9/1/2011
12/1/2011 l
3/1/2012 _,
6/1/2012
9/1/2012
12/1/2012
3/1/2013
6/1/2013
9/1/2013
12/1/2013
N 0 -1>-0 en 0 00 0
......
0 0
...... N 0
...... -1>-0
...... en 0
...... 00 0
s:
~ I w
0
n :::r -0 ., -· c.
t'D
n 0
::::s n t'D
::::s .....
Dl ..... -· 0
::::s
"'
0 0 .
6/1/2005
9/1/2005
12/1/2005
3/1/2006
6/1/2006
9/1/2006
12/1/2006
3/1/2007 •.
6/1/2007
9/1/2007
12/1/2007
3/1/2008
6/1/2008 .
9/1/2008 •.
12/1/2008
3/1/2009
6/1/2009
9/1/2009
12/1/2009
3/1/2010
6/1/2010
9/1/2010
12/1/2010
3/1/2011 .
6/1/2011
9/1/2011
12/1/2011
3/1/2012
6/1/2012
9/1/2012
12/1/2012
3/1/2013
6/1/2013
9/1/2013
12/1/2013
\.n 0
..... 0 0
..... \.n 0
N 0 0
N \.n 0
w 0 0
w
\.n 0
s: :e I w
t--ao
z -· r-1"
OJ r-1" tD
n 0 :::s n tD :::s r-1"
OJ
r-1" -· 0 :::s
"'
0
6/1/2005
9/1/2005
12/1/2005
3/1/2006
6/1/2006 -
9/1/2006
12/1/2006
3/1/2007
6/1/2007
9/1/2007
12/1/2007
3/1/2008
6/1/2008
9/1/2008 -
12/1/2008
3/1/2009
6/1/2009
9/1/2009
12/1/2009
3/1/2010
6/1/2010
9/1/2010
12/1/2010
3/1/2011
6/1/2011
9/1/2011
12/1/2011
3/1/2012
6/1/2012 -
9/1/2012
12/1/2012 -
3/1/2013
6/1/2013
9/1/2013
12/1/2013
V'l 0
1-' 0 0
1-' V'l 0
"-> 0 0
"-> V'l 0
s
~ I w
t-a
n ::r -0
""'' -· c.
tD
n 0
::J n tD
::J ,....
Ql ,.... -· 0
::J
"'
TabL
CSV Transmittal Letter
Kathy Weinel
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Dear Mr. Lundberg,
Kathy Weinel
Friday, February 21, 2014 9:08AM
'Rusty Lundberg'
'Phillip Goble'; 'Dean Henderson'; Harold Roberts; Frank Filas, P.E; David Frydenlund; Dan
Hillsten; David Turk; Jaime Massey
Transmittal of CSV Files White Mesa Mill 2013 04 Nitrate Monitoring
131 0396-EDD-rev1.csv
Attached to this e-mail is an electronic copy of laboratory results for nitrate monitoring conducted at the White Mesa
Mill during the fourth quarter of 2013, in Comma Separated Value (CSV) format.
Please contact me at 303-389-4134 if you have any questions on this transmittal.
Yours Truly
Kathy Weinel
1