DRC-2013-003535 - 0901a068803d7647

November 18,2013
Sent VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
Mr. Rusty Lundberg
Division of Radiation Control
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144850
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Re: Transmittal of 3rd Quarter 2013 Nitrate Monitoring Report
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Blvd. Suite 600
Lakewood, CO, US, 80228
303 974 2140
www.energyfuels.com
Stipulation and Consent Order Docket Number UGW12-04 White Mesa Uranium Mill
Dear Mr. Lundberg:
Enclosed are two copies of the White Mesa Uranium Mill Nitrate Monitoring Report for the 3rd
Quarter of 2013 as required by the Stipulation and Consent Order Docket Number UGW12-04, as well
as two CDs each containing a word searchable electronic copy of the report.
If you should have any questions regarding this report please contact me.
You:~ry~:. e
ENERGY FUELS REso RCES (USA) I ·
Kathy Weinel
Quality Assurance Manager
cc: David C. Frydenlund
Dan Hillsten
Harold R. Roberts
David E. Turk
Frank Filas
JoAnn Tischler
Central Files
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Nitrate Monitoring Report
State of Utah
Stipulated Consent Agreement, January 2009
Docket No. UGW09-03
3rd Quarter
(July through September)
2013
Prepared by:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Boulevard, Suite 600
Lakewood, CO 80228
November 18,2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1
2.0 GROUNDWATER NITRATE MONITORING ................................................ !
2.1 Samples and Measurements Taken During the Quarter ..................................... 1
2.1.1 Nitrate Monitoring ...................................................................................... 2
2.1.2 Parameters Analyzed .................................................................................. 3
2.1.3 Groundw ter Head and Level Monitoring .......................... _ ........................ 3
2.2 SampJjqg Methodology and Equjpment·and O~;;conramination Pr cedure ....... 3
2.2.1 W U Purging, Sampling and Depth to Groundwater .................................. 4
2.2.2 Piezon1eter Sarnpling .................................................................................. 5
2.3 Field Data .................................................................. , ......................................... 5
2.4 Depth to Groundwater Data and Water Tabl on~oor Map .............................. 5
2.5 Laboratory Re uJt · .............................................................................................. 5
2.5. i Copy of Laboratory Resulls ........................................................................ 5
2.5.2 Regltlat. ry ra tnework ............................................................................... 5
3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCEAND DATA VALIDATION ................................... 6
3.1 Field QC San1pl " ............................................................................................... 6
3.2 Adherence to Mill Sampling SOPs ..................................................................... 6
3.3 Analyte Completeness Review ........................................................................... 7
3.4 Data Validation .................................................................................................... 7
3.4.1 Field Data QNQC Evaluation ..................................................................... 7
3.4.2 Holding Time Evaluation ............................................................................ 8
3.4.3 Analytical Method Checklist ...................................................................... 8
3.4.4 Reporting Limit Evaluation ........................................................................ 8
3.4.5 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates .................................................. 9
3.4.6 Other Laboratory QA/QC .................................................................... , ...... 9
3.4.7 Receipt Temperature Evaluation ............................................................... 10
3.4.8 Rinsate Check ........................................................................................... 10
4.0 INTERPRETATION OF DATA ....................................................................... 10
4.1 Interpretation of Groundwater Levels, Gradients and Flow Directions ........... 10
4.1.1 Current Site Groundwater Contour Map ................................................... 10
4.1.2 Comparison of Current Groundwater Contour Map to Groundwater Contour Map
for Previous Quarter .................................................................................. 13
4.1.3 Hydrographs .............................................................................................. 14
4.1.4 Depth to Groundwater Measured and Groundwater Elevation ................. 14
4.2 Effectiveness of Hydraulic Containment and Capture ...................................... 15
4.2.1 Hydraulic Containment and Control. ........................................................ 15
4.2.2 Current Nitrate and Chloride Isoconcentration Maps ........... , ................... 16
4.2.3 Comparison of Areal Extent ............................................................................ 16
4.2.4 Nitrate and Chloride Concentration Trend Data and Graphs .................... 16
4.2.5 Interpretation of Analytical Data .............................................................. 17
4.3 Estimation of Pumped Nitrate Mass and Residual Nitrate Mass within the Plume
.......................................................................................................................... 18
5.0 LONG TERM PUMP TEST AT TWN-02, TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-25
OPERATIONS REPORT .................................................................................. 20
5.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 20
5.2 Pumping Well Data Collection ......................................................................... 20
5.3 Water Level Measurements ........... , ...... ; ............. ~ ............................................. 21
5.4 Pumping Rates and Volumes .................................. , .............................. , .......... 21
5.4.1 Weather Event of September 18,2013 ................ , ........................................... 2 ]
5.4.2 TW4-20 and TW4-24 ....................................................................................... 22
6.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT ................................................................. 22
6.1 Assessment of Previous Quarter's Corrective Actions ..................................... 22
7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................ 22
8.0 ELECTRONIC DATA FILES AND FORMAT .............................................. 26
9.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION ........................................................... 27
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Table 5
LIST OF TABLES
Summary of Well Sampling and Constituents for the Period
Nitrate Mass Removal Per Well Per Quarter
Nitrate Well Pumping Rates and Volumes
Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate mass Removed and Total Volume of Water
Pumped
Nitrate Data Over Time for MW-30, MW-31, MW-5, and MW-11
ii
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
Tab B Order of Sampling and Field Data Worksheets
Tab C Kriged Current Quarter Groundwater Contour Map and Weekly, Monthly and Quarterly
Depth to Water Data
Tab D Kriged Previous Quarter Groundwater Contour Map
Tab E Hydrographs of Groundwater Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab F Depths to Groundwater and Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab G Laboratory Analytical Reports
Tab H Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
H-1 Field Data QNQC Evaluation
H-2 Holding Time Evaluation
H-3 Analytical Method Check
H-4 Reporting Limit Evaluation
H-5 QNQC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
H-6 QC Control limits for Analysis and Blanks
H-7 Receipt Temperature Evaluation
H-8 Rinsate Evaluation
Tab I Kriged Current Quarter Nitrate and Chloride Isoconcentration Maps
Tab J Analyte Concentration Data Over Time
Tab K Nitrate and Chloride Concentration Trend Graphs
Tab L CSV Transmittal Letter
iii
AWAL
CA
CAP
CIR
DIFB
DRC
EFRI
ft amsl
GWDP
LCS
MS
MSD
QA
QAP
QC
RPD
sco
SOPs
UDEQ
voc
ACRONYM LIST
American West Analytical Laboratory
Consent Agreement
Corrective Action Plan
Contamination Investigation Report
Deionized Field Blanks
Utah Division of Radiation Control
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
feet above mean sea level
Groundwater Discharge Permit
Laboratory Control Spike
Matrix Spike
Matrix Spike Duplicate
Quality Assurance
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan
Quality Control
Relative Percent Difference
Stipulated Consent Order
Standard Operating Procedures
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
Volatile Organic Compounds
IV
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Utah Department of Environmental Quality ("UDEQ") Division of Radiation Control
("DRC") noted in a Request dated September 30, 2008 (the "Request"), for a Voluntary Plan and
Schedule to Investigate and Remediate Nitrate Contamination at the White Mesa Uranium Mill
(the "Mill") (the "Plan"), that nitrate levels have exceeded the State water quality standard of 10
mg/L in certain monitoring wells. As a result of the Request, Energy Fuels Resources (USA)
Inc. ("EFRI") entered into a Stipulated Consent Agreement with the Utah Water Quality Board
in January 2009 which directed the preparation of a Nitrate Contamination Investigation Report
("CIR"). A subsequent letter dated December 1, 2009, among other things, recommended that
EFRI also address elevated chloride concentrations in the CIR. The Stipulated Consent
Agreement was amended in August 2011. Under the amended Consent Agreement ("CA"),
EFRI submitted a Corrective Action Plan ("CAP"), pursuant to the requirements of the Utah
Groundwater Quality Protection Rules [UAC R317-6-6.15(C-E)] on November 29, 2011 and
revised versions of the CAP on February 27, 2012 and May 7, 2012. On December 12, 2012,
DRC signed the Stipulation and Consent Order ("SCO"), Docket Number UGW12-04, which
approved the EFRI CAP, dated May 7, 2012. The SCO ordered EFRI to fully implement all
elements of the May 7, 2012 CAP.
Based on the schedule included in the CAP and as delineated and approved by the SCO, all
activities associated with the implementation of the CAP began in January, 2013. The reporting
requirements specified in the CAP and SCO are included in this quarterly nitrate report.
This is the Quarterly Nitrate Monitoring Report, as required under the SCO, State of UDEQ
Docket No. UGW12-04 for the 3rd quarter of 2013. This report meets the requirements of SCO,
State of UDEQ Docket No. UGW12-04 and is the document which covers nitrate monitoring
activities during the 3rd quarter of 2013.
2.0 GROUNDWATER NITRATE MONITORING
2.1 Samples and Measurements Taken During the Quarter
A map showing the location of all groundwater monitoring wells, piezometers, existing wells,
temporary chloroform contaminant investigation wells and temporary nitrate investigation wells
is attached under Tab A. Nitrate samples and measurements taken during this reporting period
are discussed in the remainder of this section.
1
2.1.1 Nitrate Monitoring
Quarterly sampling for nitrate monitoring parameters was performed in the following wells:
TWN-1
TWN-2
TWN-3
TWN-4
TWN-7
TWN-18
TW4-22*
TW4-24*
TW4-25*
Piezometer 1
Piezometer 2
Piezometer 3
As discussed in Section 2.1.2 the analytical constituents required by the CAP are inorganic
chloride and nitrate+nitrite as N (referred to as nitrate in this document)
* TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25 are chloroform investigation wells and are sampled as part of the
chloroform program. The analytical suite for these three wells includes nitrate, chloride and a
select list of Volatile Organic Compounds ("VOCs") as specified in the chloroform program.
These three wells are included here because they are being pumped as part of the remediation of
the nitrate contamination as required by the SCO and the CAP. The nitrate and chloride data are
included in this report as well as in the chloroform program quarterly report. The VOC data for
these three wells will be reported in the chloroform quarterly monitoring report only.
The December 12, 2012 SCO approved the CAP which specified the cessation of sampling in
TWN-5, TWN-6, TWN-8, TWN-9, TWN-10, TWN-11, TWN-12, TWN-13, TWN-14, TWN-15,
TWN-16, TWN-17, and TWN-19. Per the CAP and SCO, these wells were not sampled during
this quarter. Additionally, the CAP and SCO approved the abandonment of TWN-5, TWN-8,
TWN-9, TWN-10, TWN-11, TWN-12, TWN-13, TWN-15, and TWN-17 within 1 year of the
SCO approval. These wells were abandoned in accordance with the DRC-approved Well
Abandonment Procedure on July 31, 2013. TWN-6, TWN-14, TWN-16, and TWN-19 have
been maintained for depth to groundwater monitoring only, as noted in the CAP.
Table 1 provides an overview of all locations sampled during the current period, along with the
date samples were collected from each location, and the date(s) upon which analytical data were
received from the contract laboratory. Table 1 also identifies rinsate samples collected, as well
as sample numbers associated with any required duplicates.
As indicated in Table 1, nitrate monitoring was performed in the nitrate monitoring wells, TW 4-
22, TW4-24, TW4-25 and Piezometers 1, 2, and 3. Analytical data for all of the above-listed
wells, and the piezometers, are included in Tab G.
Nitrate and chloride are also monitored in all of the Mill's groundwater monitoring wells and
chloroform investigation wells. Data from those wells for this quarter are incorporated in certain
maps and figures in this report but are discussed in their respective programmatic reports.
2
2.1.2 Parameters Analyzed
Locations sampled during this reporting period were analyzed for the following constituents:
• Inorganic Chloride
• Nitrate plus Nitrite as Nitrogen (referred to herein as nitrate)
Use of analytical methods consistent with the requirements found in White Mesa Mill
Groundwater Quality Assurance Plan, ("QAP") Revision 7.2, dated June 6, 2012 was confirmed
for all analytes, as discussed later in this repmt.
2.1.3 Groundwater Head and Level Monitoring
Depth to groundwater was measured in the following wells and/or piezometers, pursuant to Pmt
I.E.3 of the Groundwater Discharge Permit ("GWDP") (dated August 24, 2012):
• The quarterly groundwater compliance monitoring wells
• Existing well MW -4 and all of the temporary chloroform investigation wells
• Piezometers-P-1, P-2, P-3, P-4 and P-5
• MW-20, MW-22, and MW-34
• The DR piezometers that were installed during the Southwest Hydrogeologic
Investigation
• Nitrate wells TWN-01, TWN-02, TWN-03, TWN-04, TWN-06, TWN-07, TWN-14,
TWN-16, TWN-18 and TWN-19
In addition to the above, depth to water measurements are routinely observed in conjunction with
sampling events for all wells sampled during quarterly and accelerated efforts, regardless of the
sampling purpose.
All well levels used for groundwater contour mapping were measured and recorded within 5
calendar days of each other as indicated by the measurement dates in the summary sheet under
Tab C. Field data sheets for groundwater measurements are also provided in Tab c.
Weekly and monthly depth to groundwater measurements were taken in the chloroform pumping
wells MW-4, MW-26, TW4-19, TW4-20, and TW4-4, and the nitrate pumping wells TW4-22,
TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2. In addition, monthly water level measurements were taken in
non-pumping wells MW-27, MW-30, MW-31, TW4-21, TWN-1, TWN-3, TWN-4, TWN-7, and
TWN-18 as required by the CAP.
2.2 Sampling Methodology and Equipment and Decontamination Procedures
The QAP provides a detailed presentation of procedures utilized for groundwater sampling
activities under the GWDP (August 24, 2012).
The sampling methodology, equipment and decontamination procedures that were performed for
the nitrate contaminant investigation, as summarized below, are consistent with the QAP.
3
2.2.1 Well Purging, Sampling and Depth to Groundwater
A list of the wells in order of increasing nitrate contamination is generated quarterly. The order
for purging is thus established. The list is included with the Field Data Worksheets under Tab B.
Mill personnel start purging with all of the nondetect wells and then move to the wells with
detectable nitrate concentrations, progressing from the wells having the lowest nitrate
contamination to wells with the highest nitrate contamination.
Before leaving the Mill office, the pump and hose are decontaminated using the cleaning agents
described in Attachment 2-2 of the QAP. Rinsate blanks are collected at a frequency of one
rinsate per 20 field samples.
Purging is completed to remove stagnant water from the casing and to assure that representative
samples of formation water are collected for analysis. There are three purging strategies
specified in the QAP that are used to remove stagnant water from the casing during groundwater
sampling at the Mill. The three strategies are as follows:
1. Purging three well casing volumes with a single measurement of field parameters
2. Purging two casing volumes with stable field parameters (within 10% Relative Percent
Difference ["RPD"])
3. Purging a well to dryness and stability (within 10% RPD) of a limited list of field parameters
after recovery.
Mill personnel proceed to the first well, which is the well with the lowest concentration (i.e. non-
dectect) of nitrate based on the previous quarter's sampling results. Well depth measurements
are taken and the one casing volume is calculated. The purging strategy that will be used for the
well is determined at this time based on the depth to water measurement and the previous
production of the well. The Grundfos pump (a 6 to 10 gallon per minute [gpm] pump) is then
lowered to the appropriate depth in the well and purging is started. At the first well, the purge
rate is measured for the purging event by using a calibrated 5 gallon bucket. After the
evacuation of the well has been completed, the well is sampled when possible, and the pump is
removed from the well and the process is repeated at each well location moving from the least
contaminated to most contaminated well. If sample collection is not possible due to the well
being purged dry, a sample is collected after recovery using a disposable bailer and as described
in Attachment 2-3 of the QAP. Sample collection follows the procedures described in
Attachment 2-4 of the QAP.
After the samples have been collected for a particular well, the samples are placed into a cooler
that contains ice. The well is then recapped and Mill personnel proceed to the next well. If a
bailer has been used it is disposed of.
Decontamination of non-dedicated equipment, using the reagents in Attachment 2-2 of the QAP,
is performed between each sample location, and at the beginning of each sampling day, in
addition to the pre-event decontamination described above.
4
2.2.2 Piezometer Sampling
Samples are collected from Piezometers 1, 2 and 3, if possible. Samples are collected from
piezometers using a disposable bailer after one set of field measurements have been collected.
Due to the difficulty in obtaining samples from the piezometers, the purging protocols set out in
the QAP are not followed.
Mter samples are collected, the bailer is disposed of and samples are placed into a cooler
containing ice for sample preservation and transit to the Mill's contract analytical laboratory,
American West Analytical Laboratories ("AWAL").
2.3 Field Data
Attached under Tab B are copies of all Field Data Worksheets that were completed during the
quarter for the nitrate investigation monitoring wells, and piezometers identified in Section 2.1.1
above, and Table 1.
2.4 Depth to Groundwater Data and Water Table Contour Map
Depth-to-groundwater measurements that were utilized for groundwater contours are included on
the Quarterly Depth to Water Sheet at Tab C of this Report along with the kriged groundwater
contour map for the current quarter generated from this data. All well levels used for
groundwater contour mapping were measured and recorded within 5 calendar days of each other
as indicated by the measurement dates in the summary sheet under Tab C. A copy of the kriged
groundwater contour map generated from the previous quruter's data is provided under Tab D.
2.5 Laboratory Results
2.5.1 Copy of Laboratory Results
All analytical results were provided by AW AL. Table 1 lists the dates when analytical results
were reported to the Quality Assurance ("QA") Manager for each well or other sample.
Results from analysis of samples collected for this quarter's nitrate investigation and a limited
list of chloroform investigation nitrate and chloride results are provided under Tab G of this
Report. Also included under Tab G are the results of analyses for duplicate samples and rinsate
samples for this sampling effort, as identified in Table 1. See the Groundwater Monitoring
Report and Chloroform Monitoring Report for this quarter for nitrate and chloroform analytical
results for the groundwater monitoring wells and chloroform investigation wells not listed in
Table 1.
2.5.2 Regulatory Framework
As discussed in Section 1.0 above, the Request, Plan, and CA each triggered a series of actions
on EFRI' s part. Potential surficial sources of nitrate and chloride have been described in the
December 30, 2009 CIR and additional investigations into potential sources were completed and
discussed with DRC in 2011. Pursuant to the CA, the CAP was submitted to the Director of the
Division of Radiation Control (the "Director") on May 7, 2012. The CAP describes activities
5
associated with the nitrate in groundwater. The CAP was approved by the Director on December
12, 2012. This quarterly report documents the monitoring consistent with the program described
in the CAP.
3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCEANDDATA VALIDATION
EFRI' s QA Manager performed a QA/Quality Control ("QC") review to confirm compliance of
the monitoring program with requirements of the QAP. As required in the QAP, data QA
includes preparation and analysis of QC samples in the field, review of field procedures, an
analyte completeness review, and QC review of laboratory data methods and data. Identification
of field QC samples collected and analyzed is provided in Section 3.1. Discussion of adherence
to Mill sampling Standard Operating Procedures ("SOPs") is provided in Section 3.2. Analytical
completeness review results are provided in Section 3.3. The steps and tests applied to check
field data QA/QC, holding times, receipt temperature and laboratory data QA/QC are discussed
in Sections 3.4.1 through 3.4.7 below.
The analytical laboratory has provided summary reports of the analytical QA/QC measurements
necessary to maintain conformance with National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation
Conference certification and reporting protocol. The Analytical Laboratory QA/QC Summary
Reports, including copies of the Mill's Chain of Custody and Analytical Request Record forms
for each set of Analytical Results, follow the analytical results under Tab G. Results of review
of the laboratory QA/QC information are provided under Tab H and discussed in Section 3.4,
below.
3.1 Field QC Samples
The following QC samples were generated by Mill personnel and submitted to the analytical
laboratory in order to assess the quality of data resulting from the field sampling program.
Field QC samples for the nitrate investigation program consist of one field duplicate sample for
each 20 samples, DI Field Blanks ("DIFB"), and equipment rinsate samples.
During the quarter, one duplicate sample was collected as indicated in Table 1. The duplicate
was sent blind to the analytical laboratory and analyzed for the same parameters as the nitrate
wells.
One rinsate blank sample was collected as indicated on Table 1. Rinsate samples are labeled
with the name of the subsequently purged well with a terminal letter "R" added (e.g. TWN-7R).
The field QC sample results are included with the routine analyses under Tab G.
3.2 Adherence to Mill Sampling SOPs
The QA Manager review of Mill Personnel's adherence to the existing SOPs, confirmed that the
QAJQC requirements established in the QAP and Chloroform QAP were met.
6
3.3 Analyte Completeness Review
All analyses required by the GWDP for nitrate monitoring for the period were performed.
3.4 Data Validation
The QAP and GWDP (August 24, 2012) identify the data validation steps and data QC checks
required for the nitrate monitoring program. Consistent with these requirements, the QA
Manager performed the following evaluations: a field data QNQC evaluation, a holding time
evaluation, an analytical method check, a reporting limit evaluation, a QC evaluation of sample
duplicates, a QC evaluation of control limits for analysis and blanks, a receipt temperature
evaluation, and a rinsate evaluation. Because no VOCs are analyzed for the nitrate
contamination investigation, no trip blanks are required in the sampling program. Each
evaluation is discussed in the following sections. Data check tables indicating the results of each
test are provided under Tab H.
3.4.1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation
The QA Manager performs a review of all field recorded parameters to assess their adherence
with QAP requirements. The assessment involved review of two sources of information: the
Field Data Sheets and the Quarterly Depth to Water summary sheet. Review of the Field Data
Sheets addresses well purging volumes and stability of five parameters: conductance, pH,
temperature, redox potential, and turbidity. Review of the Depth to Water data confirms that all
depth measurements used for development of groundwater contour maps were conducted within
a five-day period of each other. The results of this quarter's review are provided under Tab H.
Based upon the review of the field data sheets, all wells conformed to the QAP purging and field
measurement requirements. A summary of the purging techniques employed and field
measurements taken is described below:
Purging Two· C .ing V0lllme wi·th StabJe Fiel.d Param ter' (wi thin I 0% RPD}
Wells TWN-01, TWN-04, and TWN-18 were sampled after two casing volumes were removed.
Field parameters pH, specific conductivity, turbidity, water temperature, and redox potential
were measured during purging. All field parameters for this requirement were stable within 10%
RPD.
Purging a Well to Dryness and Stability of a Limited L.ist of Field Parameters
Wells TWN-03 and TWN-07 were purged to dryness before two casing volumes were evacuated.
After well recovery, one set of measurements for the field parameters of pH, specific
conductivity, and water temperature only were taken; the samples were collected, and another set
of measurements for pH, specific conductivity, and water temperature were taken. Stabilization
of pH, conductivity and temperature are required within 10% RPD under the QAP. All field
parameters for this requirement were stable within 10% RPD.
Continuously Pumped Wells
Wells TWN-02, TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-25 are continuously pumped wells. These wells are
pumped on a set schedule per the remediation plan and are considered sufficiently evacuated to
7
immediately collect a sample. As previously noted, TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-25 are
chloroform investigation wells and are sampled under the chloroform program. Data for nitrate
and chloride are provided here for completeness purposes.
During review of the field data sheets, it was observed that sampling personnel consistently
recorded depth to water to the nearest 0.01 foot.
All field parameters for all wells were within the QAP required limits, as indicated below.
The review of the field sheets for compliance with QAP requirements resulted in the
observations noted below. The QAP requirements in Attachment 2-3 specifically state that field
parameters must be stabilized to within 10% over at least 2 consecutive measurements for wells
purged to two casing volumes or to dryness. The QAP Attachment 2-3 states that turbidity
should be less than 5 NTU prior to sampling unless the well is characterized by water that has a
higher turbidity. The QAP Attachment 2-3 does not require that turbidity measurements be less
than 5 NTU prior to sampling. As such the noted observations regarding turbidity measurements
greater than 5 NTU below are included for information purposes only.
• Five well measurements exceeded the QAP's 5 NTU turbidity goal as noted in Tab H. All
required turbidity RPD's met the QAP Requirement to stabilize within 10%.
EFRI's letter to DRC of March 26, 2010 discusses further why turbidity does not appear to be an
appropriate parameter for assessing well stabilization. In response to DRC's subsequent
conespondence dated June 1, 2010 and June 24, 2010, EFRI has completed a monitoring well
redevelopment program. The redevelopment report was submitted to DRC on September 30,
2011. DRC responded to the redevelopment repmt via letter on November 15, 2012. Per the
DRC letter dated November 15, 2012, the field data generated this quarter are compliant with the
turbidity requirements of the approved QAP.
3.4.2 Holding Time Evaluation
QAP Table 1 identifies the method holding times for each suite of parameters. Sample holding
time checks are provided in Tab H. All samples were received and analyzed within the required
holding time.
3.4.3 Analytical Method Checklist
All analytical methods reported by the laboratory were checked against the required methods
enumerated in the QAP. Analytical method checks are provided in Tab H. All methods were
consistent with the requirements of the QAP.
3.4.4 Reporting Limit Evaluation
All analytical method reporting limits reported by the laboratory were checked against the
reporting limits enumerated in the QAP. Reporting Limit Checks are provided in Tab H. All
analytes were measured and reported to the required reporting limits, with the exception of
several samples that had increased reporting limits due to matrix interference or required dilution
due to the sample concentration. However, in all of those cases the analytical results were
8
greater than the repmting limit used.
3.4.5 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
Section 9 .1.4 a) of the QAP states that RPDs will be calculated for the comparison of duplicate
and original field samples. The QAP acceptance limits for RPDs between the duplicate and
original field sample is less than or equal to 20% unless the measured results are less than 5
times the required detection limit. This standard is based on the EPA Contract Laboratory
Program National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review, February 1994, 9240.1-05-
01 as cited in the QAP. The RPDs are calculated for duplicate pairs for all analytes regardless of
whether or not the reported concentrations are greater than 5 times the required detection limits.
However, data will be considered noncompliant only when the results are greater than 5 times
the required detection limit and the RPD is greater than 20%. The additional duplicate
information is provided for information purposes.
The duplicate results were within a 20% RPD. Results of the RPD test are provided in Tab H.
3.4.6 Other Laboratory QA/QC
Section 9.2 of the QAP requires that the laboratory's QA/QC Manager check the following items
in developing data reports: (1) sample preparation information is correct and complete, (2)
analysis information is correct and complete, (3) appropriate Analytical Laboratory procedures
are followed, (4) analytical results are correct and complete, (5) QC samples are within
established control limits, (6) blanks are within QC limits, (7) special sample preparation and
analytical requirements have been met, and (8) documentation is complete. In addition to other
laboratory checks described above, EFRI' s QA Manager rechecks QC samples and blanks (items
(5) and (6)) to confirm that the percent recovery for spikes and the relative percent difference for
spike duplicates are within the method-specific required limits, or that the case narrative
sufficiently explains any deviation from these limits. Results of this quantitative check are
provided in Tab H.
All lab QA/QC results met these specified acceptance limits.
The QAP Section 8.1.2 requires that a Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate ("MS/MSD") pair
be analyzed with each analytical batch. The QAP does not specify acceptance limits for the
MS/MSD pair, and the QAP does not specify that the MS/MSD pair be prepared on EFRI
samples only. Acceptance limits for MS/MSDs are set by the laboratories. The review of the
information provided by the laboratories in the data packages verified that the QAP requirement
to analyze an MS/MSD pair with each analytical batch was met. While the QAP does not require
it, the recoveries were reviewed for compliance with the laboratory established acceptance limits.
The QAP does not require this level of review, and the results of this review are provided for
information only.
The information from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports indicates that the MS/MSDs
recoveries and the associated RPDs for the samples were within acceptable laboratory limits for
the regulated compounds except as indicated in Tab H. The data recoveries that are outside the
laboratory established acceptance limits do not affect the quality or usability of the data because
the recoveries are above the acceptance limits and are indicative of matrix interference. Matrix
9
interferences are applicable to the individual sample results only. The requirement in the QAP to
analyze a MS/MSD pair with each analytical batch was met and as such the data are compliant
with the QAP.
The information from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports indicates that the Laboratory
Control Sample recoveries were acceptable which indicate that the analytical system was
operating properly.
The QAP Section 8.1.2 requires that each analytical batch shall be accompanied by a reagent
blank. All analytical batches routinely contain a blank, which is a laboratory-grade water blank
sample made and carried through all analytical steps. For the Mill samples, a method blank is
prepared for all analytical methods. The information from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary
Reports indicates that the method blanks did not contain detections of any target analytes above
the Reporting Limit.
3.4.7 Receipt Temperature Evaluation
Chain of Custody sheets were reviewed to confirm compliance with the QAP requirement in
QAP Table 1 that samples be received at 6°C or lower. Sample temperatures checks are
provided in Tab H. All samples were received within the required temperature limit.
3.4.8 Rinsate Check
Rinsate checks are provided in Tab H. A comparison of the rinsate blank sample concentration
levels to the QAP requirements -that rinsate sample concentrations be one order of magnitude
lower than that of the actual well -indicated that all of the rinsate blank analytes met this
criterion. Al rinsate and DIFB blank samples were non-detect for the quarter.
4.0 INTERPRETATION OF DATA
4.1 Interpretation of Groundwater Levels, Gradients and Flow Directions.
4.1.1 Current Site Groundwater Contour Map
As stated above, a listing of groundwater level readings for the current quarter (shown as depth
to groundwater in feet) is included under Tab C. The data from this tab has been interpreted
(kriged) and plotted in a water table contour map, provided under the same tab. The contour
map is based on the current quarter's data for all wells.
The water level contour map indicates that perched water flow ranges from generally
southwesterly beneath the Mill site and tailings cells to generally southerly along the eastern and
western margins of White Mesa. Water level patterns northeast of the Mill site appear slightly
different this quarter compared to last quarter due to the reduced number of water level
measurements resulting from abandonment of several of the TWN-series wells.
Perched water mounding associated with the wildlife ponds locally changes the generally
southerly perched water flow patterns. For example, northeast of the Mill site, mounding
associated with wildlife ponds results in locally northerly flow near PIEZ-1. The impact of the
10
mounding associated with the northern ponds, to which water has not been delivered since
March, 2012, is diminishing and is expected to continue to diminish as the mound decays due to
reduced recharge.
Not only has recharge from the wildlife ponds impacted perched water elevations and flow
directions at the site, but the cessation of water delivery to the northern ponds, which are
generally upgradient of the nitrate and chloroform plumes at the site, has resulted in changing
conditions that are expected to impact constituent concentrations and migration rates within the
plumes. Specifically, past recharge from the ponds has helped limit many constituent
concentrations within the plumes by dilution while the associated groundwater mounding has
increased hydraulic gradients and contributed to plume migration. Since use of the northern
wildlife ponds ceased in March 2012, the reduction in recharge and decay of the associated
groundwater mound are expected to increase many constituent concentrations within the plumes
while reducing hydraulic gradients and acting to reduce rates of plume migration. EFRI and its
consultants have raised the issues and potential effects associated with cessation of water
delivery to the northern wildlife ponds during discussions with DRC in March 2012 and May
2013.
The impacts associated with cessation of water delivery to the northern ponds are expected to
propagate downgradient (south and southwest) over time. Wells close to the ponds are generally
expected to be impacted sooner than wells farther downgradient of the ponds. Therefore,
constituent concentrations are generally expected to increase in downgradient wells close to the
ponds before increases are detected in wells farther downgradient of the ponds. Although such
increases are anticipated to result from reduced dilution, the magnitude and timing of the
increases are difficult to predict due to the complex permeability distribution at the site and
factors such as pumping and the rate of decay of the groundwater mound. The potential exists for
some wells completed in higher permeability materials to be impacted sooner than some wells
completed in lower permeability materials even though the wells completed in lower
permeability materials may be closer to the ponds.
Localized increases in concentrations of constituents such as nitrate and chloride within and near
the nitrate plume may occur even when the nitrate plume is under control based on the Nitrate
CAP requirements. Ongoing mechanisms that can be expected to increase the concentrations of
nitrate and chloride locally as a result of reduced wildlife pond recharge include but are not
limited to:
1) Reduced dilution -the m1xmg of low constituent concentration pond recharge into
existing perched groundwater will be reduced over time.
2) Reduced saturated thicknesses -dewatering of higher permeability layers receiVmg
primarily low constituent concentration pond water will result in wells intercepting these
layers receiving a smaller proportion of the low constituent concentration water.
The combined impact of the above two mechanisms may be especially evident at chloroform
pumping wells MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19, and TW4-20; nitrate pumping wells TW4-22,
TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2; and non-pumped wells adjacent to the pumped wells. The
overall impact is expected to be generally higher constituent concentrations in these wells over
time until mass reduction resulting from pumping and natural attenuation eventually reduce
11
concentrations. Short-term changes in concentrations at pumping wells and wells adjacent to
pumping wells are also expected to result from changes in pumping conditions.
In addition to changes in the flow regime caused by wildlife pond recharge, perched flow
directions are also locally influenced by operation of the chloroform and nitrate pumping wells.
As shown in the detail water level map provided under Tab C well defined cones of depression
are evident in the vicinity of all chloroform pumping wells except TW4-4, which began pumping
in the first quarter of 2010. Although operation of chloroform pumping well TW4-4 has
depressed the water table in the vicinity of TW4-4, a well-defined cone of depression is not
clearly evident. The lack of a well-defined cone of depression near TW4-4likely results from 1)
variable permeability conditions in the vicinity of TW4-4, and 2) persistent relatively low water
levels at adjacent well TW4-14.
Well-defined cones of depression are also not clearly evident near nitrate pumping wells TW4-
22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2, which started pumping during the first quarter of 2013, most
likely because they have not had sufficient time to develop. Water level patterns near these wells
are expected to be influenced by the presence of and the decay of the groundwater mound
associated with the northern wildlife ponds, and by the persistently low water level elevation at
TWN-7, which is located upgradient of the nitrate pumping wells. Although operation of the
nitrate pumping system has not yet produced a well-defined impact on water levels, continued
operation of the system is expected to produce a well-defined capture zone that will merge with
and enhance the capture associated with the chloroform pumping system. The actual impact of
nitrate pumping on the chloroform pumping system cannot be evaluated until more data are
collected as part of routine monitoring.
As discussed above, variable permeability conditions is one likely reason for the lack of a well-
defined cone of depression near chloroform pumping well TW4-4. Changes in water levels at
wells immediately south of TW4-4 resulting from TW4-4 pumping are expected to be muted
because TW4-4 is located at a transition from relatively high to relatively low permeability
conditions south (downgradient) of TW4-4. The permeability of the perched zone at TW4-6 and
TW4-26 (and recently installed well TW4-29) is approximately two orders of magnitude lower
than at TW4-4. Any drawdown of water levels at wells immediately south of TW4-4 resulting
from TW4-4 pumping is also difficult to determine because of the general, long-term increase in
water levels in this area due to recharge from the wildlife ponds.
Water levels at TW4-4 and TW4-6 increased by nearly 2.7 and 2.9 feet, respectively, between
the fourth quarter of 2007 and the fourth quarter of 2009 (just prior to TW 4-4 pumping) at rates
of approximately 1.2 feet/year and 1.3 feet/year, respectively. However, the increase in water
level at TW4-6 has been reduced since the start of pumping at TW4-4 (first quarter of 2010) to
approximately 0.5 feet/year suggesting that TW4-6 is within the hydraulic influence of TW4-4
(note: hydrographs for these wells are provided in the quarterly Chloroform Monitoring Report,
EFRI 2013). Water level elevations at these wells are eventually expected to be influenced by
cessation of water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds as discussed above. Recharge from the
southern wildlife pond is expected to continue to have an effect on water levels near TW4-4, but
the effects related to recharge from the northern ponds is expected to diminish over time as water
is no longer delivered to the northern ponds.
12
The lack of a well-defined cone of depression at TW4-4 is also influenced by the persistent,
relatively low water level at non-pumping well TW4-14, located east ofTW4-4 and TW4-6. For
the current quarter, the water level at TW4-14 (approximately 5527.7 feet above mean sea level
["ft amsl"]) is approximately 12 feet lower than the water level at TW4-6 (approximately 5539.6
ft amsl) and 17 feet lower than at TW4-4 (approximately 5544.6 ft amsl) even though TW4-4 is
pumpmg.
Well TW4-27 (installed south of TW4-14 in the fomth quarter of 2011) has a static water level
of approximately 5527.0 ft amsl, similar to TW4-14 (approximately 5527.7 ft amsl). Prior to the
installation of TW4-27, the persistently low water level at TW4-14 was considered anomalous
because it appeared to be downgradient of all three wells TW4-4, TW4-6, and TW4-26, yet
chloroform was not detected at TW4-14. Chloroform had apparently migrated from TW4-4 to
TW4-6 and from TW4-6 to TW4-26 which suggested that TW4-26 was actually downgradient of
TW 4-6, and TW 4-6 was actually downgradient of TW 4-4, regardless of the flow direction
implied by the low water level at TW4-14. The water level at TW4-26 (5538.9 feet amsl) is,
however, lower than water levels at adjacent wells TW4-6 (5539.6 feet amsl), and TW4-23
(5543.1 feet amsl), as shown in the detail water level map under Tab C.
Hydraulic tests indicate that the permeability at TW4-27 is an order of magnitude lower than at
TW4-6 and three orders of magnitude lower than at TW4-4 (see Hydro Geo Chern, Inc. [HGC],
September 20, 2010: Hydraulic Testing of TW4-4, TW4-6, and TW4-26, White Mesa Uranium
Mill, July 2010; and HGC, November 28, 2011: Installation, Hydraulic Testing, and Perched
Zone Hydrogeology of Perched Monitoring Well TW4-27, White Mesa Uranium Mill Near
Blanding, Utah). The similar water levels at TW4-14 and TW4-27, and the low permeability
estimate at TW4-27 suggest that both wells are completed in materials having lower permeability
than nearby wells. The low permeability condition likely reduces the rate of long-term water
level increase at TW4-14 and TW4-27 compared to nearby wells, yielding water levels that
appear anomalously low. This behavior is consistent with hydraulic test data collected from
recently installed wells TW4-29, TW4-30, and TW4-31 last quruter which indicate that the
permeability of these wells is similar to that of TW4-6 and TW4-26, but an order of magnitude
higher than that of TW 4-27.
4.1.2 Comparison of Current Groundwater Contour Map to Groundwater Contour Map
for Previous Quarter
The groundwater contour maps for the Mill site for the previous quarter, as submitted with the
Nitrate Monitoring Report for the previous quarter, are attached under Tab D.
A comparison of the water table contour maps for the current (third) quarter of 2013 to the water
table contour maps for the previous quarter (second quarter of 2013) indicates similar patterns of
drawdown related to operation of chloroform pumping wells MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19
and TW4-20. Although nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 were
brought into operation during the first quruter of 2013, their impact on water level patterns is not
yet clearly evident. As a result, water levels and water level contours for the site have not
changed significantly since the last quarter, except for a few locations. As discussed in Section
4.1.1, pumping at TW4-4, which began in the first quarter of 2010, has depressed the water table
near TW 4-4, but a well-defined cone of depression is not clearly evident, likely due to variable
13
permeability conditions near TW4-4 and the persistently low water level at adjacent well TW4-
14.
Reported decreases in water levels (increases in drawdown) of approximately 3 feet and nearly 2
feet occurred in chloroform pumping well MW-26 and nitrate pumping well TW4-25,
respectively, and increases in water levels (decreases in drawdown) of approximately 2 feet
occurred in chloroform pumping wells MW-4 and TW4-19, and of approximately 5 feet occurred
in nitrate pumping well TW4-24. Changes in water levels at other pumping wells (chloroform
pumping wells TW4-4 and TW4-20 and nitrate pumping wells TW4-22 and TWN-2) were less
than 2 feet. Water level fluctuations at pumping wells typically occur in part because of
fluctuations in pumping conditions just prior to and at the time the measurements are taken. The
quarterly Chloroform Monitoring Report provides additional details on water levels in these
wells.
The decrease in water level (increase in draw down) at chloroform pumping well MW -26 has
slightly increased the apparent capture of this well relative to other pumping wells. Overall, the
combined capture of chloroform pumping wells MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19, and TW4-20
is nearly the same as last quarter.
Water level decreases ranging from approximately 0.8 to 2.6 feet at Piezometers 2 and 3, and
TWN-4, likely result from cessation of water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds as discussed
in Section 4.1.1 and the consequent continuing decay of the associated perched water mound.
The water level decrease of approximately 0.7 feet reported for TWN-1 is likely related to both
decay of the perched water mound and operation of nitrate pumping well TW4-25.
At the southwest corner of the site, water level increases of nearly 4 feet occurred at MW -20 and
approximately 6 feet at piezometer DR-21. Water was also reported to be present at the bottom
of formerly dry piezometer DR-22.
4.1.3 Hydrographs
Attached under Tab E are hydrographs showing groundwater elevation m each nitrate
contaminant investigation monitor well over time.
As noted in Section 2.1.1, nitrate wells TWN-05, TWN-08, TWN-09, TWN-10, TWN-11, TWN-
12, TWN-13, TWN-15, and TWN-17 were abandoned in accordance with the DRC-approved
Well Abandonment Procedure on July 31, 2013. The historic hydrographs are included this
quarter for information purposes. No data will be added in future reports and the hydrographs
will not be included in future quarterly reports unless requested by DRC.
4.1.4 Depth to Groundwater Measured and Groundwater Elevation
Attached in Tab F are tables showing depth to groundwater measured and groundwater elevation
over time for each of the wells listed in Section 2.1.1 above.
As noted in Section 2.1.1, nitrate wells TWN-05, TWN-08, TWN-09, TWN-10, TWN-11, TWN-
12, TWN-13, TWN-15, and TWN-17 were abandoned in accordance with the DRC-approved
14
Well Abandonment Procedure on July 31, 2013. The historic measured depth to groundwater
and groundwater elevation data are included this quarter for information purposes. No data will
be added in future reports and the tables will not be included in future quarterly reports unless
requested by DRC.
4.2 Effectiveness of Hydraulic Containment and Capture
4.2.1 Hydraulic Containment and Control
The CAP states that hydraulic containment and control will be evaluated in part based on water
level data and in part on concentrations in wells downgradient of pumping wells TW 4-22 and
TW4-24.
Water level data will be used to evaluate flow patterns resulting from operation of nitrate
pumping wells. Bounding stream tubes defining the capture zone of nitrate pumping wells will
be generated from the kriged quarterly perched water level data. Hydraulic containment and
control based on water level data will be considered successful per the CAP if the entire nitrate
plume upgradient of TW4-22 and TW4-24 falls within the combined capture of the nitrate
pumping wells. The CAP requires that EFRI evaluate the capture zones after four quarters of
water level measurements have been taken, and will include the capture zone boundaries on
figures in the quarterly nitrate monitoring report following the fourth quarter of water level
measurements. The current quarter is the third quarter of data collected after the commencement
of pumping the nitrate system. The capture zone maps will be generated after four quarters of
data are collected and will be included in the fourth quarter 2013 report which will be submitted
on or before March 1, 2014.
The CAP states that MW-5, MW-11, MW-30, and MW-31 are located downgradient of TW4-22
and TW4-24. MW-30 and MW-31 are within the plume near its downgradient edge and MW-5
and MW -11 are outside and downgradient of the plume. Per the CAP, hydraulic control based on
concentration data will be considered successful if the concentrations of nitrate in MW -30 and
MW-31 remain stable or decline, and concentrations of nitrate in downgradient wells MW-5 and
MW -11 do not exceed the 10 mg/L standard.
Table 5 presents the nitrate concentration data for MW-30, MW-31, MW-5 and MW-11, which
are down-gradient of pumping wells TW4-22 and TW4-24. Based on these data, the nitrate
plume is under control.
The plume has not migrated downgradient to MW -11 because nitrate was not detected at MW-
11. MW-5, located adjacent to MW-ll(which was not required to be sampled this quarter for
nitrate) was non-detect last quarter. Between the previous and current quarters, nitrate
concentrations decreased slightly in both MW-30 and MW-31. Nitrate in MW-30 decreased from
18.8 mg/L to 17.6 mg/L and nitrate in MW-31 decreased from 23.8 mg/L to 21.7 mg/L. Changes
in both wells were less than 20% suggesting the changes are within the range typical for
sampling and analytical error. Although short-term fluctuations have occurred, nitrate
concentrations in MW-30 and MW-31 have been relatively stable, demonstrating that plume
migration is minimal or absent. The relative stability of chloride in these wells also supports
minimal plume movement.
15
4.2.2 Current Nitrate and Chloride Isoconcentration Maps
Included under Tab I of this Report are current nitrate and chloride iso-concentration maps for
the Mill site. Nitrate iso-contours start at 5 mg/L and chloride iso-contours start at 100 mg/L
because those values appear to separate the plumes from background. All nitrate and chloride
data used to develop these iso-concentration maps are from the current quarter's sampling
events.
4.2.3 Comparison of Areal Extent
Although changes in concentration have occurred in wells within the nitrate plume, the
boundaries of the plume have not changed significantly since the last quarter, except that the
kriged plume boundary now encompasses well TW4-18 due to an increase in concentration from
approximately 9 to 12 mg/L between the previous and current quarters. This change, which
resulted in a less than 5% increase in plume area compared to last quarter (and a less than 2.5%
increase compared to the first quarter), likely results primarily from the cessation of water
delivery to the northern wildlife ponds and the consequent decay of the associated groundwater
mound. The reduction in low-nitrate recharge from the ponds appears to be having the
anticipated effect of increased nitrate concentrations in wells downgradient of the ponds, which
is the expected consequence of reduced dilution as discussed in Section 4.1.1.
Although such increases in concentration have been anticipated as the result of reduced dilution,
the magnitude and timing of the increases are difficult to predict due to the measured variations
in hydraulic conductivity at the site and other factors. Regardless of the specific causes of the
increase, nitrate at TW 4-18 is associated with the chloroform plume, is cross-gradient of the
nitrate plume as defined in the CAP, and is within the capture zone of the chloroform pumping
system (primarily chloroform pumping well MW-26). Perched water flow at TW4-18 is to the
southwest in the same approximate direction as the main body of the nitrate plume.
With regard to chloroform, the boundary of the northern portion of the chloroform plume has
moved slightly to the west toward nitrate pumping well TW4-24 since pumping began. Nitrate
concentrations at the downgradient edge of the plume (MW-30 and MW-31) continue to be
relatively stable, demonstrating that plume migration is minimal or absent. More details
regarding the chloroform data and interpretation are included in the Quarterly Chloroform Report
submitted under separate cover.
4.2.4 Nitrate and Chloride Concentration Trend Data and Graphs
Attached under Tab J is a table summarizing values for nitrate and chloride for each well over
time.
Attached under Tab K are graphs showing nitrate and chloride concentration plots in each
monitor well over time.
16
As noted in Section 2.1.1, nitrate wells TWN-05, TWN-08, TWN-09, TWN-10, TWN-11, TWN-
12, TWN-13, TWN-15, and TWN-17 were abandoned in accordance with the DRC-approved
Well Abandonment Procedure on July 31, 2013. The historic trend data are included this quarter
for information purposes. The tables for these wells will not be included in future quarterly
reports unless requested by DRC.
4.2.5 Interpretation of Analytical Data
Comparing the nitrate analytical results to those of the previous quatter, as summarized in the
tables included under Tab J, the following observations can be made for wells within and
immediately surrounding the nitrate plume:
a) Nitrate concentrations have increased by more than 20% in the following wells
compared to last quarter: TW4-10, TW4-18, TW4-19, TW4-24, TWN-1 and TWN-2;
b) Nitrate concentrations have decreased by more than 20% in the following wells
compared to last quarter: TW4-5, TW4-21, TW4-22, TWN-3, and TWN-7;
c) Nitrate concentrations have remained within 20% in the following wells compared to
last quarter: MW-27, MW-30, MW-31, TW4-20, TW4-25, TWN-4, and TWN-18;
d) MW-11, MW-25 and TW4-16 remained non-detect; and
e) MW-32 decreased from 0.1 mg/L to non-detect.
As indicated, nitrate concentrations for six of the wells with detected nitrate were within 20% of
the values reported for the wells during the previous quarter, suggesting that variations are within
the range typical for sampling and analytical error. The remaining wells (TW4-5, TW4-10, TW4-
18, TW4-19, TW4-21, TW4-22, TW4-24, TWN-1, TWN-2, TWN-3, and TWN-7) had changes
in concentration greater than 20%. Of the latter, TW4-19 is a chloroform pumping well, and
TW4-22, TW4-24, and TWN-2 are nitrate pumping wells. TW4-18 is located adjacent to nitrate
pumping well TW4-19 and TWN-7 is located adjacent to nitrate pumping well TWN-2.
Fluctuations in concentrations at pumping wells and wells adjacent to pumping wells likely
result in part from the effects of pumping as discussed in Section 4.1.1.
Nitrate pumping well TWN-2 had the highest detected nitrate concentration. Since the last
quarter, the nitrate concentration in pumping well TWN-2 increased from approximately 58
mg/L to 80 mg/L. The chloroform concentration in nitrate pumping well TW4-22 decreased from
12,500 ~giL to 9,640 ~giL. Chloroform changes are likely in response to the start-up of nitrate
pumping in the first quarter and are affected by the presence of historically high chloroform
concentrations at adjacent, cross-gradient well TW4-20. MW-27, located west of TWN-2, and
TWN-18, located north of TWN-3, bound the nitrate plume to the west and north (See Figure 1-1
under Tab 1). In addition, the southernmost (downgradient) boundary of the plume remains
between MW-30/MW-31 and MW-5/MW-11. Nitrate concentrations at MW-5 (adjacent to MW-
11) and MW-11 have historically been low(< 1 mg/L) or non-detect for nitrate (See Table 5).
MW-25, MW-26, MW-32, TW4-16, TW4-5, TW4-25, TWN-1, and TWN-4 bound the nitrate
plume to the east. As discussed above, the kriged plume boundary now encompasses well TW 4-
17
18 due to an increase in concentration from 8.9 to 12.1 mg!L between the previous and current
quarters. This change is likely to result primarily from the cessation of water delivery to the
northern wildlife ponds and the consequent decay of the associated groundwater mound. The
reduction in low-nitrate recharge from the ponds appears to be having the anticipated effect of
increased nitrate concentrations in wells downgradient of the ponds, which is the expected
consequence of reduced dilution as discussed in Section 4.1.1.
Nitrate concentrations outside the nitrate plume exceed 10 mg!L at a few locations: TW4-12
(17.4 mg/L), TW4-26 (11.7 mg/L), TW4-27 (27.2 mg/L), and TW4-28 (17.3 mg!L). TW4-10
also increased from less than 6 to 13 mg/L between the previous and current quarters. All these
wells are located southeast of the nitrate plume as defined in the CAP and all but TW 4-10 are
separated from the plume by numerous wells having nitrate concentrations that are either non-
detect, or, if detected, are less than 10 mg!L. Concentrations at all of the above wells except
TW 4-10 are within 20% of their concentrations during the previous quarter. The increase at
TW4-10 most likely results from the same factors that resulted in the increase at TW4-18,
primarily reduced dilution from the northern wildlife ponds as discussed above. Nitrate at TW4-
10 is also associated with the chloroform plume and is within the capture zone of the chloroform
pumping system.
Chloride concentrations are measured because elevated chloride (greater than 100 mg!L) is
associated with the nitrate plume. Chloride concentrations at all measured locations are within
20% of their respective concentrations during the previous quarter except at the following
locations: TW4-10 (increased from 51.5 to 67.9 mg/L); TW4-18 (increased from 22.9 to 36.2
mg/L); TW4-22 (decreased from 586 mg/L to 487 mg!L); and TWN-1 (increased from 17.4
mg/L to 24.1 mg!L). TW4-22 is a nitrate pumping well; TW4-10 is adjacent to chloroform
pumping well MW-26; TW4-18 is adjacent to chloroform pumping well TW4-19; and TWN-1 is
adjacent to nitrate pumping well TW4-25. Fluctuations in concentrations at pumping wells and
wells adjacent to pumping wells likely result in part from the effects of pumping. Changes in
concentrations in wells TW4-22 and TWN-1 are affected by the start-up of nitrate pumping
during the first quatter. Increases in concentration at TWN -1, TW 4-10 and TW 4-18 are also
expected to result from reduced dilution caused by cessation of water delivery to the northern
wildlife ponds, and are consistent with increases in nitrate at these wells.
4.3 Estimation of Pumped Nitrate Mass and Residual Nitrate Mass within the Plume
Nitrate mass removed by pumping is summarized in Table 2, and includes mass removed by both
chloroform and nitrate pumping wells. Table 3 shows the volume of water pumped at each well
and Table 4 provides the details of the nitrate removal for each well. Mass removal calculations
begin with the third quarter of 2010 because the second quarter, 2010 data were specified to be
used to establish a baseline mass for the nitrate plume. As stated in the CAP, the baseline mass is
to be calculated using the second quarter, 2010 concentration and saturated thickness data
"within the area of the kriged 10 mg!L plume boundary." The second quarter, 2010 data set was
considered appropriate because "the second quarter, 2010 concentration peak at TWN-2 likely
identifies a high concentration zone that still exists but has migrated away from the immediate
vicinity of TWN-2."
18
As shown in Table 2, a total of approximately 605 lb of nitrate has been removed from the
perched zone since the third quarter of 2010. Prior to the cunent quarter, all direct nitrate mass
removal resulted from operation of chloroform pumping wells MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-
19, and TW4-20. During the current quarter:
• A total of approximately 176 lb of nitrate was removed by the chloroform pumping wells
and by nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2.
• Of the 176 lb removed during the current quarter, approximately 120 lb, (or 68 %), was
removed by the nitrate pumping wells.
Baseline mass and current qumter mass estimates (nitrate + nitrite as N) for the nitrate plume are
approximately 43,700 lb and 36,930 lb, respectively. Mass estimates were calculated within the
plume boundaries as defined by the kriged 10 mg/L isocons by 1) gridding (kriging) the nitrate
concentration data on 50-foot centers; 2) calculating the volume of water in each grid cell based
on the saturated thickness and assuming a porosity of 0.18; 3) calculating the mass of
nitrate+nitrite as N in each cell based on the concentration and volume of water for each cell; and
4) totaling the mass of all grid cells within the 10 mg/L plume boundary. Data used in these
calculations included data from wells listed in Table 3 of the CAP.
The nitrate mass estimate for the current quarter is lower than the baseline estimate by 6,770 lb,
and this difference is greater than the amount of nitrate mass removed directly by pumping.
Changes in the quarterly mass estimates are expected to result primarily from 1) nitrate mass
removed directly by pumping, 2) natural attenuation of nitrate, and 3) changes in nitrate
concentrations in wells within the plume as a result of re-distribution of nitrate within the plume
and changes in saturated thicknesses. Redistribution of nitrate within the plume and changes in
saturated thicknesses will be impacted by changes in pumping and in background conditions
such as the decay of the perched water mound associated with the northern wildlife ponds.
Cessation of water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds is expected to result in reduced
saturated thicknesses and reduced dilution, which in turn is expected to result in increases in
concentrations.
The mass estimate during the current quarter (36,930 lb) was larger than the mass estimate
during the previous quarter (34,142 lb) by 2,788 lb, or approximately 8 %. The reasons for the
difference were 1) higher nitrate concentrations measured in some wells within the plume this
quarter compared to last quarter and 2) a slightly larger plume area this quarter compared to last
quarter. As discussed in Section 4.2.3, the kriged plume boundary now encompasses well TW4-
18 due to an increase in concentration from 8.9 to 12.1 mg/L between the previous and cunent
quarters. This change is likely to result primarily from the cessation of water delivery to the
northern wildlife ponds and the consequent decay of the associated groundwater mound. The
reduction in low-nitrate recharge from the ponds appears to be having the anticipated effect of
increased nitrate concentrations in wells downgradient of the ponds which is the expected
consequence of reduced dilution.
Nitrate mass removal by pumping and natural attenuation acts to lower nitrate mass within the
plume. Changes resulting from redistribution of nitrate within the plume are expected to result in
both increases and decreases in concentrations at wells within the plume and therefore increases
and decreases in mass estimates based on those concentrations, thus generating 'noise' in the
19
mass estimates. Furthermore, because the sum of sampling and analytical error is typically about
20%, changes in the mass estimates from quarter to quarter of up to 20% could result from
typical sampling and analytical error alone. Only longer-term analyses of the mass estimates that
minimize the impact of these quarter to quarter variations will provide useful information on
plume mass trends. Over the long term, nitrate mass estimates are expected to trend downward as
a result of direct removal by pumping and through natural attenuation.
As specified in the CAP, once eight quarters of data have been collected (starting with the first
quarter of 2013), a regression trend line will be applied to the quarterly mass estimates and
evaluated. The trend line will then be updated quarterly and reevaluated as additional quarters of
data are collected. The evaluation will determine whether the mass estimates are increasing,
decreasing, or stable.
5.0 LONG TERM PUMP TEST AT TWN-02, TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-
25 OPERATIONS REPORT
5.1 Introduction
Beginning in January 2013, EFRI began long term pumping of TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and
TWN-02 as required by the Nitrate CAP, dated May 7, 2012 and the SCO dated December 12,
2012.
In addition, as a part of the investigation of chloroform contamination at the Mill site, EFRI has
been conducting a Long Term Pump Test on MW-4, TW4-19, MW-26, and TW4-20, and, since
January 31, 2010, TW 4-4. The purpose of the test is to serve as an interim action that will
remove a significant amount of chloroform-contaminated water while gathering additional data
on hydraulic properties in the area of investigation.
Because wells MW-4, TW4-19, MW-26, TW4-4 and TW4-20 are pumping wells that may
impact the removal of nitrate, they will be included in this report and any nitrate removal
realized as part of this pumping will be calculated and included in this and all future nitrate
quarterly reports.
The following information documents the operational activities during the quarter.
5.2 Pumping Well Data Collection
Data collected during the quarter included the following:
• Measurement of water levels at MW-4, TW4-19, MW-26, and TW4-20 and,
commencing regularly on March 1, 2010, TW4-4, on a weekly basis, and at
selected temporary wells and permanent monitoring wells on a monthly basis.
• Measurement of pumping history, including:
pumping rates
total pumped volume
operational and non-operational periods.
20
• Periodic sampling of pumped water for chloroform and nitrate/nitrite analysis and
other constituents
• Measurement of water levels weekly at TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-02
commencing January 28, 2013, and on a monthly basis selected temporary wells
and permanent monitoring wells.
5.3 Water Level Measurements
Beginning August 16, 2003, water level measurements from chloroform pumping wells MW-4,
MW-26, and TW4-19 were conducted weekly. From commencement of pumping TW4-20, and
regularly after March 1, 2010 for TW4-4, water levels in these two chloroform pumping wells
have been measured weekly. From commencement of pumping in January 2013, water levels in
wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-02 have been measured weekly. Copies of the
weekly Depth to Water monitoring sheets for MW-4, MW-26, TW4-19, TW4-20, TW4-4, TW4-
22, TW4-24, TW4-25 and TWN-02 are included under Tab C.
Monthly depth to water monitoring is required for all of the chloroform contaminant
investigation wells and non-pumping wells MW-27, MW-30, MW-31, TW4-21, TWN-1, TWN-
3, TWN-4, TWN-7, and TWN-18. Copies of the monthly depth to Water monitoring sheets are
included under Tab C.
5.4 Pumping Rates and Volumes
The pumping wells do not pump continuously, but are on a delay device. The wells purge for a
set amount of time and then shut off to allow the well to recharge. Water from the pumping
wells is either transferred to the Cell 1 evaporation pond or is used in the Mill process.
The pumped wells are fitted with a flow meter which records the volume of water pumped from
the well in gallons. The flow meter readings shown in Tab C are used to calculate the gallons of
water pumped from the wells each quarter as required by Section 7.2.2 of the CAP. The average
pumping rates and qmuterly volumes for each of the pumping wells are shown in Table 3. The
cumulative volume of water pumped from each of the wells is shown in Table 4.
No operational problems were observed with the wells or pumping equipment during the quarter,
however, two items were noted during the quarter as described below.
5.4.1 Weather Event of September 18, 2013
The Mill experienced combined rainstorm/hailstorms on September 17 and 18, 2013. During the
September 18, 2013 storm, the Mill received nearly the highest daily precipitation in its history,
specifically 0.76 inches of rainfall and hail within 10 minutes, as measured by the Mill's on-site
meteorological station. The September 17 and 18, 2013 rainfall was accompanied by hail
ranging up to 4 centimeters in diameter. As a result of damage and flooding to the electrical
substation, power to the Mill was interrupted for less than 24 hours. The power outage
ultimately interrupted pumping of all chloroform and nitrate pumping wells for less than 24
hours. EFRI provided an informal notification to DRC on September 19, 2013 to alert them to
21
the potential that the chloroform and nitrate pumping equipment was out of service due to power
loss. The power was restored in less than 24 hours, and notifications to DRC were not required.
5.4.2 TW 4-20 and TW 4-24
During the weekly check of the pumping wells on July 2, 2013 the Mill Environmental Staff
noted a decreased flow rate in pumping wells TW4-20 and TW4-24 due to multiple wells
pumping at the same time. Mill Environmental Staff noted that they changed the timer on TW 4-
24 so that the well pumps at different times from other wells in the pumping network to
maximize the pumping efficiency of the pumping network. Based on observed flow rates in
subsequent weeks, the timer change was effective in maintaining historical flow rates and no
further actions were necessary. Notifications to DRC were not required.
6.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT
There are no corrective actions resulting from the 3rd quarter 2013 nitrate sampling event.
6.1 Assessment of Previous Quarter's Corrective Actions
There were no corrective actions in the 2nd quarter 2013 nitrate sampling event.
7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The water level contour map for the third quarter, 2013 indicates that operation of the nitrate
pumping system has not yet produced a well-defined impact on water levels, and that hydraulic
capture associated with the chloroform pumping system has not changed significantly since the
previous quarter. As nitrate pumping continues, the hydraulic capture associated with the nitrate
pumping wells is expected to merge with the hydraulic capture associated with the chloroform
pumping, yielding enhanced capture for both nitrate and chloroform plumes. However, the actual
impact of nitrate pumping on the chloroform pumping system cannot be evaluated until more
data are collected as prut of routine monitoring.
Third quarter, 2013 nitrate concentrations at many of the wells within and adjacent to the nitrate
plume were within 20% of the values reported during the previous quarter, suggesting that
variations are within the range typical for sampling and analytical error. Changes in
concentration greater than 20% occurred in wells TW4-5, TW4-10, TW4-18, TW4-19, TW4-21,
TW4-22, TW4-24, TWN-1, TWN-2, TWN-3, and TWN-7; the concentrations in wells MW-11,
MW-25 and TW4-16 remained non-detect; and the concentration in MW-32 decreased from 0.1
mg/L to non-detect.
Of the wells showing changes in concentration greater than 20%, TW 4-19 is a chloroform
pumping well, and TW4-22, TW4-24, and TWN-2 are nitrate pumping wells. TW4-18 is located
adjacent to nitrate pumping well TW4-19 and TWN-7 is located adjacent to nitrate pumping well
TWN-2. Fluctuations in concentrations at pumping wells and wells adjacent to pumping wells
likely result in part from the effects of pumping.
22
The highest nitrate concentration (80 mg/L) was detected at nitrate pumping well TWN-2. Since
the last quarter, the nitrate concentration in pumping well TWN-2 increased from approximately
58 mg/L to 80 mg/L. The chloroform concentration in nitrate pumping well TW4-22 decreased
from 12,500 [!giL to 9,640 [!giL. Chloroform changes are likely in response to the start-up of
nitrate pumping in the first quarter and are affected by the presence of historically high
chloroform concentrations at adjacent, cross-gradient well TW4-20. MW-27, located west of
TWN-2, and TWN-18, located north of TWN-3, bound the nitrate plume to the west and north.
In addition, the southernmost (downgradient) boundary of the plume remains between MW-
30/MW-31 and MW-5/MW-11. Nitrate concentrations at MW-5 (adjacent to MW-11) and MW-
11 have historically been low (< 1 mg/L) or non-detect for nitrate. MW-25, MW-26, MW-32,
TW4-16, TW4-5, TW4-25, TWN-1, and TWN-4 bound the nitrate plume to the east.
As discussed in Section 4.2.5, the kriged plume boundary now encompasses well TW4-18 due to
an increase in concentration from 8.9 to 12.1 mg/L between the previous and current quarters.
This change, which resulted in a less than 5% increase in plume area compared to last quarter
(and a less than 2.5% increase compared to the first quarter), is likely to result primarily from the
cessation of water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds and the consequent decay of the
associated groundwater mound as discussed in Section 4.1.1. The reduction in low-nitrate
recharge from the ponds appears to be having the anticipated effect of increased nitrate
concentrations in wells downgradient of the ponds, which is the expected consequence of
reduced dilution.
Although such increases have been anticipated as the result of reduced dilution, the magnitude
and timing of the increases are difficult to predict due to the measured variations in hydraulic
conductivity at the site and other factors. Regardless of the specific causes of the increase, nitrate
at TW 4-18 is associated with the chloroform plume, is cross-gradient of the nitrate plume as
defined in the CAP, and is within the capture zone of the chloroform pumping system (primarily
chloroform pumping well MW-26). Perched water flow at TW4-18 is to the southwest in the
same approximate direction as the main body of the nitrate plume.
Except in the immediate vicinity of TW4-18, the boundaries of the nitrate plume have not
changed significantly since the last quarter. The area of the plume has changed by less than 5%,
even though the plume is influenced by reduced dilution, by nitrate pumping wells TW4-22,
TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2, and changes in concentrations in wells within the plume. Nitrate
pumping has, however, caused the boundary of the northern portion of the chloroform plume to
move slightly to the west toward nitrate pumping well TW4-24. Nitrate concentrations at the
downgradient edge of the plume (MW-30 and MW-31) continue to be relatively stable,
suggesting that plume migration is minimal or absent.
The baseline nitrate (nitrate+nitrite as N) plume mass calculated as specified in the CAP (based
on second quarter, 2010 data) was approximately 43,700 lb. The nitrate plume mass estimate for
the current quarter was calculated as 36,930 lb, which was higher than the previous quarter's
estimate of 34,142 lb by 2,788 lb or 8 %. The reasons for the difference were 1) higher nitrate
concentrations measured in some wells within the plume this quarter compared to last quarter
and 2) a slightly larger plume area this quarter compared to last quarter due to the increase in
concentration at TW4-18.
23
Nitrate mass removal by pumping and natural attenuation acts to lower nitrate mass within the
plume. Changes resulting from redistribution of nitrate within the plume are expected to result in
both increases and decreases in concentrations at wells within the plume and therefore increases
and decreases in mass estimates based on those concentrations, thus generating 'noise' in the
mass estimates. Furthermore, because the sum of sampling and analytical error is typically about
20%, changes in the mass estimates from quruter to quarter of up to 20% could result from
typical sampling and analytical error alone. Only longer-term analyses of the mass estimates that
minimize the impact of these quarter to quarter variations will provide useful information on
plume mass trends. Over the long term, nitrate mass estimates are expected to trend downward as
a result of direct removal by pumping and through natural attenuation.
As specified in the CAP, once eight quarters of data have been collected (starting with the first
quarter of 2013), a regression trend line will be applied to the quarterly mass estimates and
evaluated. The trend line will then be updated quarterly and reevaluated as additional quarters of
data are collected. The evaluation will determine whether the mass estimates are increasing,
decreasing, or stable.
During the current quarter, a total of approximately 176 lb of nitrate was removed by the
chloroform pumping wells and by nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-
2. Of the 176 lb removed during the current quarter, approximately 120 lb, or 68 %, was
removed by the nitrate pumping wells.
Nitrate concentrations outside the nitrate plume exceed 10 mg/L at a few locations: TW4-12
(17.4 mg/L), TW4-26 (11.7 mg/L), TW4-27 (27.2 mg/L), and TW4-28 (17.3 mg/L). TW4-10
also increased from less than 6 to 13 mg/L between the previous and current quarters. All these
wells are located southeast of the nitrate plume and all but TW 4-10 are separated from the plume
by numerous wells having nitrate concentrations that are either non-detect, or, if detected, are
less than 10 mg/L. Concentrations at all of the above wells except TW4-10 are within 20% of
their concentrations during the previous quarter. The increase at TW 4-10 most likely results from
the same factors that resulted in the increase at TW4-18, primarily reduced dilution from the
northern wildlife ponds as discussed above. Nitrate at TW 4-10 is also associated with the
chloroform plume and is within the capture zone of the chloroform pumping system.
Chloride concentrations at all measured locations are within 20% of their respective
concentrations during the previous quarter except at the following locations: TW 4-10 (increased
from 51.5 to 67.9 mg/L); TW4-18 (increased from 22.9 to 36.2 mg/L); TW4-22 (decreased from
586 mg/L to 487 mg/L); and TWN-1 (increased from 17.4 mg/L to 24.1 mg/L). TW4-22 is a
nitrate pumping well; TW4-10 is adjacent to chloroform pumping well MW-26; TW4-18 is
adjacent to chloroform pumping well TW4-19; and TWN-1 is adjacent to nitrate pumping well
TW4-25. Fluctuations in concentrations at pumping wells and wells adjacent to pumping wells
likely result in part from the effects of pumping. Concentrations in wells TW4-22 and TWN-1
are affected by the start-up of nitrate pumping during the first quarter. Increases in concentration
at TWN-1, TW4-10 and TW4-18 are also expected to result from reduced dilution caused by
cessation of water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds, and are consistent with increases in
nitrate at these wells.
24
Nitrate mass removal from the perched zone increased substantially by the start-up of nitrate
pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 during the first quarter. Continued
operation of these wells is therefore recommended. Pumping these wells, regardless of any short
term fluctuations in concentrations detected at the wells, helps to reduce downgradient nitrate
migration by removing nitrate mass and reducing average hydraulic gradients, thereby allowing
natural attenuation to be more effective. Continued operation of the nitrate pumping system is
expected to reduce nitrate concentrations within the plume and to further reduce or halt
downgradient nitrate migration. Furthermore, as discussed in Section 4.1.1, cessation of water
delivery to the northern wildlife ponds appears to be having the anticipated impacts of reduced
dilution (which is increasing constituent concentrations at some wells) and reduced hydraulic
gradients (which will act in concert with pumping to reduce hydraulic gradients and reduce
plume migration).
While past recharge from the ponds has helped limit many constituent concentrations within the
chloroform and nitrate plumes by dilution, the associated groundwater mounding has increased
hydraulic gradients and contributed to plume migration. Since use of the northern wildlife ponds
ceased in March 2012, the reduction in recharge and decay of the associated groundwater mound
is expected to increase many constituent concentrations within the plumes while reducing
hydraulic gradients and rates of plume migration. EFRI and its consultants have raised the issues
and potential effects associated with cessation of water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds
during discussions with DRC in March 2012 and May 2013.
The impacts associated with cessation of water delivery to the northern ponds are expected to
propagate downgradient (south and southwest) over time. Wells close to the ponds are generally
expected to be impacted sooner than wells farther downgradient of the ponds. Therefore,
constituent concentrations are generally expected to increase in downgradient wells close to the
ponds before increases are detected in wells farther downgradient of the ponds. Although such
increases are anticipated to result from reduced dilution, the magnitude and timing of the
increases are difficult to predict due to the complex permeability distribution at the site and
factors such as pumping and the rate of decay of the groundwater mound. The potential exists for
some wells completed in higher permeability materials to be impacted sooner than some wells
completed in lower permeability materials even though the wells completed in lower
permeability materials may be closer to the ponds.
Localized increases in concentrations of constituents such as nitrate and chloride within and near
the nitrate plume may occur even when the nitrate plume is under control based on the Nitrate
CAP requirements. Ongoing mechanisms that can be expected to increase the concentrations of
nitrate and chloride locally as a result of reduced wildlife pond recharge include but are not
limited to:
1) Reduced dilution -the m1xmg of low constituent concentration pond recharge into
existing perched groundwater will be reduced over time.
2) Reduced saturated thicknesses -dewatering of higher permeability layers receiVmg
primarily low constituent concentration pond water will result in wells intercepting these
layers receiving a smaller proportion of the low constituent concentration water.
25
The combined impact of the above two mechanisms may be especially evident at chloroform and
nitrate pumping wells and non-pumped wells adjacent to the pumped wells. The overall impact is
expected to be generally higher constituent concentrations in these wells over time until mass
reduction resulting from pumping and natural attenuation eventually reduce concentrations.
8.0 ELECTRONIC DATA FILES AND FORMAT
EFRI has provided to the Director an electronic copy of all laboratory results for groundwater
quality monitoring conducted under the nitrate contaminant investigation during the Quarter, in
Comma Separated Values ("CSV") format. A copy of the transmittal e-mail is included under
Tab L.
26
Certification:
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared
under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified
personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the
person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,
and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
includi~ne and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Frank Filas, P.E
Vice President, Permitting and Environmental Affairs
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
28
9.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION
This document was prepared by Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. on November 18,2013.
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
By:
Frank Filas, P.E
Vice President, Permitting and Environmental Affairs
27
Tables
Table 1
Summary of Well Sampling and Constituents for the Period
Wi!JI ·S!!mple Collection Date
Piezometer 01 8/28/2013
Piezometer 02 8/28/2013
Piezometer 03 8/28/2013
TWN-01 8/27/2013
TWN-01R 8/27/2013
TWN-02 8/27/2013
TWN-03 8/28/2013
TWN-04 8/27/2013
TWN-07 8/28/2013
TWN-18 8/27/2013
TW4-22 9/3/2013
TW4-24 9/3/2013
TW4-25 9/3/2013
TWN-60 8/27/2013
TW4-60 9112/2013
TWN-65 8/27/2013
Note: All wells were sampled for Nitrate and Chloride.
TWN-60 is the nitrate program DI Field Blank.
TWN-65 is a duplicate of TWN-04.
TW4-60 is the chloroform program DI Field Blank.
Continuously pumped well.
Dhte o'f.Lab ReRQ:rt
9113/2013
9/13/2013
9113/2013
9113/2013
9/13/2013
9/13/2013
9/13/2013
9113/2013
9113/2013
9/13/2013
9/18/2013
9118/2013
9/18/2013
9113/2013
9/24/2013
9113/2013
Table 2 Nitrate Mass Removal Per Well Per Quarter
MW-4 TW4-19 TW4-20 TW4-4 TW4-22 TW4-24 TW4-25 TWN-02 Quarter Totals
Quarter (lbs.) MW-26 (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.)
Q3 2010 3.2 0.3 5.8 1.7 4.7 NA NA NA NA 15.7
Q4 2010 3.8 0.4 17.3 1.4 5.1 NA NA NA NA 28.0
Ql 2011 2.9 0.2 64.5 1.4 4.3 NA NA NA NA 73.3
Q2 2011 3.5 0.1 15.9 2.7 4.7 NA NA NA NA 27.0
Q3 2011 3.5 0.5 3.5 3.9 5.4 NA NA NA NA 16.8
Q4 2011 3.8 0.8 6.2 2.5 6.4 NA NA NA NA 19.7
Q1 2012 3.6 0.4 0.7 5.0 6.0 NA NA NA NA 15.9
Q2 2012 3.7 0.6 3.4 2.1 .5.2 NA NA NA NA 15.0
Q3 2012 3.8 0.5 3.6 2.0 4.7 NA NA NA NA 14.7
Q4 2012 3.2 0.4 5.4 1.8 4.2 NA NA NA NA 14.9
01 2013 2.5 0.4 14.1 1.4 3.6 8.1 43.4 7.5 14.8 95.7
Q2 2013 2.5 0.5 5.6 1.7 3.5 10.7 37.1 6.4 23.9 91.7
Q3 2013 3.0 0.4 48.4 1.4 3.8 6.3 72.8 6.9 33.4 176.5
Well Totals (pounds) 43.0 5.6 194.3 29.1 61.6 25.1 153.3 20.8 72.1 604.9
Table 3 Nitrate Well Pumping Rates and Volumes
Volume of Water Pumped
Pumping Well Name During the Quarter (gals) Average Pump Rate (gpm)
MW-4 72,898.8 3.5
MW-26 25,763.0 10.3
TW4-4 63,515.4 8.1
TW4-19 329,460.1 14.0
TW4-20 19,731.0 9.7
TW4-22 25,592.9 18.2
TW4-24 267,703.5 17.5
TW4-25 145,840.9 18.2
TWN-2 50,036.5 18.6
Table 4 Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
MW-4 MW-26
"
I. Total
Total Total Pumped Total Total 'Total Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total
Quarter Pumped (gal) Cone (mg/L) Cone (ug/L) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds) (gal) ., (mg/L) (ug/L) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds)
l•
Total Gallons
pumped for Total
the quartet" Total pumped Total grams/453.
Calculations from the Concentration Concentration gallons/3.785 Concentration ug/1000000 592to
and Data Flow Meter from the in mg/LX1000 to to conver to in ug/L X total to convert to convert to
Origination data analytical data convert to ug/L liters liters grams pounds
Q3 2010 79859.1 4.8 4800 302266.7 1450880129 1450.9 3.20 63850.0 0.6 600 241672.3 145003350 145 0.32
Q4 2010 90042.2 5 5000 340809.7 1704048635 1704.0 3.76 60180.0 0.7 700 227781.3 159446910 159 0.35
Q12011 76247.6 4.6 4600 288597.2 1327546964 1327.5 2.93 55130.0 0.5 500 208667.1 104333525 104 0,23 I
Q2 2011 85849.3 4.9 4900 324939.6 1592204042 1592.2 3.51 55800,6 0.3 300 211205.3 63361581 63 0.14 I
Q3 2011 85327.7 4.9 4900 322965.3 1582530188 1582.5 3.49 65618.0 0.9 900 248364.1 223527717 224 0.49
Q4 2011 89735.0 5.1 5100 339647.0 1732199573 1732.2 3.82 50191.3 2 2000 189974.1 379948141 380 0.84
Q1 2012 90376.4 4.8 4800 342074.7 1641958435 1642.0 3.62 31440.1 1.7 1700 119000.8 202301323 202 0.45
Q2 2012 90916.5 4.9 4900 344118.8 1686181940 1686.2 3.72 26701.2 2.5 2500 101064.1 252660294 253 0.56
Q3 2012 91607.0 5 5000 346732.5 1733662475 1733.7 3.82 25246.0 2.6 2600 95556.1 248445886 248 0.55
Q4 2012 78840.0 4.8 4800 298409.4 1432365120 1432.4 3.16 30797.0 1.46 1460 116566.6 170187302 170 0.38
Q12013 62943.7 4.78 4780 238241.9 1138796304 1138.8 2.51 22650.7 2.27 2270 85732.9 194613682 195 0.43
Q2 2013 71187.3 4.22 4220 269443.9 1137053387 1137.1 2.51 25343.4 2.11 2110 95924.8 202401263 202 0.45 i
Q3 2013 72898.8 4.89 4890 275922.0 1349258375 1349.3 2.97 25763.0 1.98 1980 97513.0 193075651 193 0.43 I -
Totals Since Q3
2010 1065830.55 43.01 538711.3 5.60
Highlighted cells are the total for the current quarter
Table 4 Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
TW4·19 TW4-20
l i
I
Total Pumped Cone Cone Total Pumped Total Total Total Pumped Cone Cone Total Pumped Total Total
Quarter (gal) (mg/L) , (ug/L) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds) (gal) (mg/L) (ug/L) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds)
'
I II I
i
..
II
Calculations
and Data
Origination
Q3 2010 116899.2 5.9 5900 442463.5 2.611E+09 2611 5.76 39098.3 5.3 5300 147987.1 784331447 784 1.73
Q4 2010 767970.5 2.7 2700 2906768.3 7.848E+09 7848 17.30 36752.5 4.6 4600 139108.2 639897778 640 1.41
Q12011 454607.9 17 17000 1720690.9 2.925E+10 29252 64.49 37187.5 4.4 4400 140754.7 619320625 619 1.37
Q2 2011 159238.9 12 12000 602719.2 7.233E+09 7233 15.95 67907.7 4.8 4800 257030.6 1.234E+09 1234 2.72
Q3 2011 141542.6 3 3000 535738.7 1.607E+09 1607 3.54 72311.2 6.5 6500 273697.9 1.779E+09 1779 3.92
Q4 2011 147647.2 5 5000 558844.7 2.794E+09 2794 6.16 72089.3 4.2 4200 272858.0 1.146E+09 1146 2.53
Q1 2012 148747.0 0.6 600 563007.4 337804437 338 0.74 76306.0 7.9 7900 288818.2 2.282E+09 2282 5.03
Q2 2012 172082.0 2.4 2400 651330.5 1.563E+09 1563 3.45 22956.4 11 11000 86890.1 955790963 956 2.11
Q3 2012 171345.0 2.5 2500 648540.8 1.621E+09 1621 3.57 22025.0 10.8 10800 83364.6 900337950 900 1.98
Q4 2012 156653.0 4.1 4100 592931.6 2.431E+09 2431 5.36 20114.0 11 11000 76131.5 837446390 837 1.85
Q12013 210908.0 7.99 7990 798286.8 6.378E+09 6378 14.06 18177.0 9,07 9070 68799.9 624015501 624 1.38
Q2 2013 226224.0 2.95 2950 856257.8 2.526E+09 2526 5.57 20252.4 9.76 9760 76655.3 748156060 748 1.65
Q3 2013 329460.1 17.6 17600 1247006.5 2.195E+10 21947 48.39 19731.0 8.65 8650 74681.8 645997873 646 1.42 -
Totals Since Q3
2010 3203325.4 194.34 524908.3 29.09
Highlighted cells are the total for the current quarter
Table 4 Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
TW4-4 TW4-22
Total Total Total Total
Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total
Quarter (gal) (mg/L) , (ug/L) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds) (gal) (mg/L) (ug/L) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds)
I
I
I I
Calculations I~ and Data
Origination
Q3 2010 76916.8 7.30 7300.00 291130.1 2.1E+09 2125.25 4.69 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q4 2010 86872.1 7.10 7100.00 328810.9 2.3E+09 2334.56 5.15 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q12011 73360.0 7.00 7000.00 277667.6 1.9E+09 1943.67 4.29 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q2 2011 80334.6 7.00 7000.00 304066.5 2.1E+09 2128.47 4.69 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q3 2011 97535.0 6.60 6600.00 369170.0 2.4E+09 2436.52 5.37 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q4 2011 109043.5 7.00 7000.00 412729.6 2.9E+09 2889,11 6.37 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q1 2012 101616.8 7.10 7100.00 384619.6 2.7E+09 2730.80 6.02 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q2 2012 87759.1 7.10 7100.00 332168.2 2.4E+09 2358.39 5.20 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q3 2012 80006.0 7.10 7100.00 302822.7 2.2E+09 2150.04 4.74 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q4 2012 71596.0 7.00 7000.00 270990.9 1.9E+09 1896.94 4.18 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q1 2013 58716.8 7.36 7360.00 222243.1 1.6E+09 1635.71 3.61 16677.4 58.0 58000.0 63124,0 3661189622.0 3661.2 8.07
Q2 2013 65603.4 6.30 6300.00 248308.9 1.6E+09 1564.35 3.45 25523.2 50.2 50200.0 96605.3 4849586662.4 4849.6 10.69
Q3 2013 63515.4 7.22 7220.00 240405.8 1.7E+09 1735.73 3.83 25592.9 29.7 29700.0 96869.1 2877013057.1 2877.0 6.34
Totals Since Q3
2010 1052875.5 61.57 67793.5 25.11
Highlighted cells are the total for the current quarter
Table 4 Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
TW4-24 TW4-25 -
Total Total Total Total
Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total
Quarter (gal) (mgll) (ug/L) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds) (gal) (mg/L) (ug/L) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds)
I
II
Calculations II I and Data
Origination - -
Q3 2010 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q4 2010 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Ql 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q2 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q3 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
'
NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q4 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q12012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q2 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA I
Q3 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q4 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q12013 144842.6 35.9 35900.0 548229.2 19681429751.9 19681.4 43.39 99369.9 9.0 9000.0 376115.1 3385035643.5 3385.0 7.46 !
Q2 2013 187509.3 23.7 23700.0 709722.7 16820428001.9 16820.4 37.08 147310.4 5.2 5240.0 557569.9 2921666087.4 2921.7 6.44
Q3 2013 267703.5 32.6 32600.0 1013257.7 33032202568.5 33032.2 72.82 145840.9 5.7 5690.0 552007.8 3140924419.0 3140.9 6.92
Totals Since Q3
2010 600055.4 153.30 392521.2 20.83
Highlighted cells are the total for the current quarter
Table 4 Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
TWN-QZ
I
Total
Removed
Total Total by All
Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total Wells
Quarter (gal) (mgll) (ugll) J (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds) (pounds)
I
Calculations I
and Data
Origination
Q3 2010 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 15.69
Q4 2010 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 27.97
Q12011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 73.30
Q2 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 27.01
Q3 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 16.82
Q4 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 19.71
Q12012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 15.86
Q2 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 15.03
Q3 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 14.67
Q4 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 14.92
Q12013 31009.4 57.3 57300.0 117370.6 6725334176.7 6725.3 14.83 95.73
Q2 2013 49579.3 57.7 57700.0 187657.7 10827846433.9 10827.8 23.87 91.71
Q3 2013 50036.5 80.0 80000.0 189388.2 15151052200.0 15151.1 33.40 176.53
Totals Since Q3
2010 130625.2 72.10 604.94
Highlighted cells are the total for the current quarter
_Location , Q2 2o.IO
_MW-30_ 15.8
'MW-SII' 22.5
MW-5 ND
M'Wd t ND
ND =Not detected
NS =Not Sampled
Q3:20L0
15
21
NS
ND
Table 5 Nitrate Data Over Time forMW<lO. MW-31. MW-5. and MW-11 -·
Q4 21!)110 Q l 20 11 ·Q~'20l l Q!r2011 ~~~.Uf r-~1~Jg; ·Q220l2
16 16 17 16 16 17 16
20 21 22 21 21 21 20
0.2 NS 0.2 NS 0.2 NS 0.1
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Q3.10J-2 "Q4:20L2 Qi2013 Q2 201~ Q3'2013
17 18.5 21.4 18.8 17.6
21 23.6 19.3 23.8 21.7
NS ND NS ND NS
ND ND ND ND ND
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
Tab B Order of Sampling and Field Data Worksheets
Tab C Kriged Current Quarter Groundwater Contour Map and Depth to Water Data
Tab D Kriged Previous Quarter Groundwater Contour Map
Tab E Hydrographs of Groundwater Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab F Depths to Groundwater and Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab G Laboratory Analytical Reports
Tab H Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
H-1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation
H-2 Holding Time Evaluation
H-3 Receipt Temperature Check
H-4 Analytical Method Check
H-5 Reporting Limit Evaluation
H-6 QAJQC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
H-7 Rinsate Check
H-8 QC Control Limits for Analyses and Blanks
Tab I Kriged Current Quarter Isoconcentration Maps
Tab J Analyte Concentration Data Over Time
Tab K Concentration Trend Graphs
Tab L CSV Transmittal Letter
Tab A
Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
TW4·19
€B
MW·5 •
TW4-12
0
TWN-7
~
PIEZ·1
perched chloroform or
nitrate pumping well
perched monitoring well
temporary perched monitoring well
temporary perched nitrate monitoring well
~ perched piezometer
TW4-32
~ temporary perched monitoring well
installed September, 2013
RUIN SPRING b seep or spring
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC. APPROVED
SITE PLAN SHOWING PERCHED WELL
AND PIEZOMETER LOCATIONS
WHITE MESA SITE
DATE REFERENCE
H :/718000/nov13/Uwelloc0913.srf
FIGURE
A-1
TabB
Order of Sampling and Field Data Worksheets
Name
TWN-1
TWN-7
TWN-4
TWN-18
TWN-3
TWN-2
Duplicate of
Rinsate
Piez 1
Piez 2
Piez 3
Nitrate Order
~r-}. ~ Quarter 2013
Nitrate Samples Rinsate Samples
Nitrate
Mg/L
Previous
Qrt. Date/Purge sample
o.84 I s1z.·11 n I iD\4
1.16 t,/z..~ ll'J o.b3z
1.63 11Vt."llt3 lt.01
2.32 f6/2-1/l~ iz.SD
27.2 I ~I z.61l'3. 06"13.
57.7 ~/1:1()'3 lY'tl.>
•r\hl·o<f g -~
~ « lt.'711' }'2.01
8.88 K/"..i<./1:3 0730
0.172 g/2~/13 01>~5
1.85 .!/u/1'!:; Oroq
Depth Total Depth Name Date
m.sl TWN-lR
105 TWN-7R
125.7 TWN-4R
145 TWN-18R
96 TWN-3R
96 TWN-2R
Samplers:
Sample
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I 3 ;JI Qv.c.H'"f~,.. JV ~·+ru.fe. z.o I 3
See instruction
Location (well name): 1'----'f_i_e_-z._-_O_l _________ ___,
Sampler Name
and initials: I ......r,.t~nG.r HoJ/1Jca.;jM
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I <i{ I Z. ~ / ZO 13 and Sampling (if different) I /""'/A
Well Purging Equip Used: [Q]pump or IT[] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I Al/A
Purging Method Used: [QJ2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I G. >NA.?f c r-~ N ,fro.+<' Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event I~....-_P._1~_~;;...~_0_3...;;._ _____ --'
pH Buffer 7.0 7,0 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance ._I _"1_~-~------'1 [!MHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): .._I _o ____ _,
Depth to Water Before Purging I b Z . b () 4" Well:~_o ___ --i,(.653h)
3" Well:_ o . (.367h)
Casing Volume (V)
Conductance (avg) ~ '2...15 1.....-------------------' pH of Water (avg) '1.1/ 0 1.....-~-----------~
Well Water Temp. (avg) ) 5. 3.2... Redox Potential (Eh)l 33 '2... Turbjd'lly.._l -=-}.3 __ ___,
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling eventl._l ;...;;Jt!'-0 __ __,
Time I ;:) ,z:c; I Gal. Purged I
ij I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I "Z..'2..1~ I pH 1 '1 .9o I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I JS ."52 I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I :!!3:l.. I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I l 3 I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q , in gpm.
S/60 = I 0
Time to evacuate two oa">ing volumes (2V)
T= 2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 0
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ]L-.:..A...;...W---'-A'-'1... _____ ____,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D
Nutrients Ill D 100 ml D ~ H2S04 ~
Heavy Metals D D 250 ml D D HN03 D
All Other Non Radiologies D D 250 ml D D No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D
Other (specify) li 0 Sample volume D ffi} D
G 'hl oride. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth ]._b=-Lj....:....:....' {,=-1'-------' Sample Time 0730
See instruction
Comment
OY'I s_;t~ 1\-\--077.1 . ..,..;:flf\('r ""~ G-&<~11"'· ~ p Y"<".5<!1'1f-' +b ,b.,:} Se.n-,f)c~.
b.,.'li."~ 'IY.A co/lt-c.+~J. ~t 073lJ, w()t.+o-wo..~Wil>.Stlj C.leCA./"
~..-,n ~.i£... (At o 7 Y 1
Piez-01 08-28-2013 ]Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
D
D
Rl
2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I 3rA Q v.D.rh:l' ..N1lr~h~ 2..013
/' See instruction
Location (well name): I.___._P--'i-=c.-=7.,_~--=0'--'t""". _________ ___,
Sampler Name
and initials: I ~Mif'' HoJI.."J,.;~/rn
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I ~/1...8'/2..0\3 and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: IQ]pump or IT!] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: IQJ2 casings IQJ3 casings
Sampling Event I Q W\O:It<;.r~ IV ;·fr •. ..f., I Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event l._~_w_N_-_b_D ______ _,
pH Buffer 7.0 L-1 _7_._6 ___ ____. pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance ._I _____,4_,1_~'---------'' ~MHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): .__o ____ ____,
Depth to Water Before Purging 1-:!:12 ,30 Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:~~O----ll(.653h)
3"Well:_ 0 _(.367h)
Conductance (avg) ..__-=b;...;:6~1!..---------l pH of Water ( avg) 7,7b
Well Water Temp. (avg) I I 9, 51 Redox Potential (Eh)j.___~_l.5 __ __, TurbidityL-j _3_. I __ _.
Weather Cond. Ext' IAmb. Temp. oc (prior sampling event)L-1 1---'7_0 __ _,
Time I 065j I Gal. Purged I {) I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I 'g" I pH l 77b I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I IY.sGt I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ~15 I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 3 .1 I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHl I
Temp. oc I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 0 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I :) Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I c I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 0
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ._I _A_w_A_L ______ _,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
VOCs
Nutrients
Heavy Metals
All Other Non Radiologies
Gross Alpha
Other (specify)
Gn 'or;~(
Final Depth I 3 ~. f. 'f
Comment
Arr;\l~d on ~;'ic ll'-t
So.mp1 ('~ b,..~lc~ fA}
y N specified below)
D D 3x40 ml
D D 100 ml
D D 250 ml
D D 250 ml
D D 1,000 ml
~ D Sample volume
Sample Time ~.-1 ..::.0-=ill..:::=:....__ _ __,
06~'1. -r;.nncr-"""). G-111rr:" prc...s.~,;t" to
O(..S~. w"tt-r Wd\~ Mos.t~ Clc~r.
Piez-02 08-28-2013 [Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
y N y N
D D HCL D D
D ~ H2S04 [!I D
D D HN03 D D
D D No Prese1-v. D D
D D HN03 D D
D ~ D ~
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
See instruction
b"' ., s~ I'V\pl~5..
Lc:fr s;h: ll\f 0 f-1;1
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
DescriptionofSamplingEvent: 1-:!.rO: Q\AOI.rft>,.-,Ni:}r,..1'c. Zol3
See instruction
Location (well name): 1'---P_i e_z_-_0_3 _________ ___.
Sampler Name
and initials: I :::r;:,n er HoJI;Jr..j /17J
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I ~/z.S/"Z013 and Sampling (if different) ._I ~-/.-~----------'
Well Purging Equip Used: [Q]pump or (][]bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) ,....~ '---------~
Purging Method Used: [QJ2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I G. ').Cf..i'fcrl_j N iot r ~~.+c. Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event I p; C7.. -0 2
pH Buffer 7.0 7,0
Specific Conductance ._I _1_'f_li ____ _.l~-tMHOS/ em
Depth to Water Before Purging I Y ~ , D S
Conductance (avg) '!, 1"":!>'-'----------~
pH Buffer 4.0 Lt.O
Well Depth(O.Olft): l._o _____ _.
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" Well:l ? 1(.653h)
3" Well:!-. ~o-----i_(.367h)
IZ .o{s'
WellWaterTemp.(avg) I 14,l1" Redox Potential (Eh)l z.C. 0 TurbidityiL--J_z. __ _.
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. ·c (prior sampling eventl._l _17_0 _ ____.
Time I 010 ~ I Gal. Purged I C5 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance 1313G. I pH I 1'2. Z5 8 I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc II'Lt;\C I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I Z.'-0 I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I IZ I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged b gallon{s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate .Q) in gpm .
S/60 = I b
Time to evacuate two ta. ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 0
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs AWA L
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D
Nutrients IE D 100 ml D !!] H2S04 ~
Heavy Metals D D 250m! D D HN03 D
All Other Non Radiologies D D 250 ml D D No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume D Kl 0
Gh\or;~e_ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth ._I _.y....;;;b..;... -=--13;;.....__ __ _. Sample Time
See instruction
Comment
Arr;\J<.J.. ""' .s•+c. q,t o70'3. --y;:",.,er ..,,J. 6-o..rr•'r~ pr~!;.c,} +• 'B~.') s..~,..,pJc-s...
~"'""fie--> b ..... -1~~ (1,+ 070'7, wo.+ef'" w~~ Mo"o.t,!j C.ketr I ~+t-s;fc ""-}-()7/.S
Piez-03 08-28-2013 !Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
D
D
~
2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I "3.. r6 Ou.CArfu N dr~~.fc.. Z.£> I~
See instruction
Location (well name): 1._-r_vJ_AJ_-_O_l _________ ___,
Sampler Name
and initials: fT!.nncr t/dJI,J~J-n+
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I g /2.7/ L.O 1 ~ and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: IT[] pump or ~bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I G·r VI(\ a fo..s
Purging Method Used: ~2 casings ~3 casings
Sampling Event I Q..;..[.\rh.r ~ !0;Jru.fc.. Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event llw .0-Ol R.
pH Buffer 7.0 1.0 pH Buffer 4.0 l.j .0
Specific Conductance ._I _1..:..1~~'-------~~ !!MHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): I 112· SO
Depth to Water Before Purging I 5 '-. 4 Z.... 4" Well:I .,SE,, C. L. 1(.653h)
31 Well.: 0 (.367h) '------I
Casing Volume (V)
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg) 7.2:3
Well Water Temp. (avg) 15, IZ Redox Potential (Eh)l 2.77.. Turbidity I ..... 4.:...Y.:........ _ __.
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. ·c (prior sampling event).__l _Z._2_0 _ __.
Time I \Dl.G, I Gal. Purged I fd) I Time 11017 I Gal. Purged I I c) I
Conductance I ~1.b I pH 11-7..3 I Conductance I ~~5 I pH 17,Z'"f I
Temp. oc I 15 .):3 I Temp. oc I [S,J:S I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ?..7k I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I Z7rJ I
Turbidity (NTU) 1 9b I Turbidity (NTU) I '1{. I
Time 1 ,o,s I Gal. Purged I 1m I Time l lOlGf I Gal. Purged lqt:l I
Conductance I Bl:jV I pH I 7.'Z3 I Conductance ll~:; I pHI 7.Z3 I
Temp. oc I 15.12: I Temp. oc 1 JS.rz I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I "1...7'(} I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 271 I
Turbidity (NTU) I ~q I Turbidity (NTU) I qq I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = l....__-'-1 0=-· __ ______.
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 7.:3Z I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 0
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs A'WAL
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients [11 D 100 ml 5I IJ1 H2S04 l&l D
Heavy Metals D D 250 ml D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologies D D 250 ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume 0 rn. D ~
G}, lor ;de If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative;
Final Depth IL-...:...1 0;...:8:::...';..;..1.:,_1 ----~ Sample Time
See instruction
Comment
Pv..r~c. ~c~o-.tl P..:t \DID, Pv.r~~~ Lo.')ell
c.l~o-r . HM~c.. -enJea "'('\~
TWN-01 08-27-2013 JDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2 riE,.,ERGYF<J~LS WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL .<': J See instruction
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I 3 ,-a G v.c.rfe (" A),· fr<1\ ft!. z.o 13
Location (well name): I._=J'"'1_w_IJ_-_o_I_R ________ __.
Sampler Name
and initials: I :::::r=;:,,er HoJ );{)e>..:;JffH
Field Sample ID 1 -r\JAJ -oiJ<_ogz;zoJ3
Date and Time for Purging I 8/z.. 7/z.0/:3 and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: [Q]pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: ~2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event 13 ,.1:( Q.,.~ J . · A.L frc-,.ft:: Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event ,_,_,J_/1_11 _______ ___,
pH Buffer 7.0 1._7_._0 ___ ___, pH Buffer 4.0 '-/.0
Specific Conductance ._I _q...:..'f..:...1...__ __ _.l [!MHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft):
Depth to Water Before Purging ._I _0.::...._ __ ___, Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:~~Q~----ll(.653h)
3" Well:_ J _(.367h)
Conductance (avg) l. 2. '----------~ pH of Water (avg) S.S7
Well Water Temp. (avg) I z.z.. t>D Redox Potential (Eh)l YO S Turbidity._! _o __ ___.
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. ·c (prior sampling event)l._./_,'1_0 __ __,
Time I 0-1 2 7 I Gal. Purged I ,l,.O I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I ).Z I pH I 5.5 7 I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I zz.rm I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I go:s I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 · I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged ISO gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q) in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = .._I ...... 10""-------' T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs L-1 _.ft~Wc...:./t.t...:L=------__.
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients og D 100 ml D ~ H2S04 £1 0
Heavy Metals D D 250m! 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologies D 0 250m! 0 D No Preserv. 0 D
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml D 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) lXI 0 Sample volume 0 ~ D .15]
chltJ~;Jc If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth ,_I .;;;_() ____ __. Sample Time OGJ2$
See instruction
Comment
Arr;veJ on sJc o..} l><j I().!:;,..,("" .,..,J G-o.rr,·"' prcs.c.t~J -f':r r "~""f-c
~,·flS.C.+" h~~M o.+ 0q15. ?vf"''pcJ. 50 6--,.{ ol\j ,Soo.p wc..+cr o..11d ]0/) {s.<.,)/oll.j
of' D.T. w"-+cr R'1'1..5t:th ~nJcJ ~,J Sr.,.,..p)t'.!l c:..o/Jccfe-J a.T O"JZ.t!
Left s;+, tli.t D'f~l)
TWN-OlR 08-27-2013 lno not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I '3ra Q\A6.c-+cr ;0 ;fr~+c::. zo13
Location (well name): ._I _li...;.....;.W..;.....;AJ;...-...;;0'--"Z.~----------'
Sampler N arne
and initials:
Field Sample ID '"'TWN-0(._ C>~ Z7'2.0l3
Date and Time for Purging ._I --=8~/..;;2;..:7"'"/-=Z:..::D;..:.I.-~.3:..__ __ __. and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: lrupump or @]bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
See instruction
....V/A
Purging Method Used: @]2 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event I Q"'-,.,A-trl,:1 tJ i-l r"-1' c. Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event ._I-D_w_JJ_-_0_~ _____ ___,
pH Buffer 7.0 7,() pH Buffer 4.0 'j,O
Specific Conductance ._I -'4'-J1._~:..__ ___ _,1!lMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): I 'I b. Dl>
Depth to Water Before Purging I 32. b4 Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:l 41.~'-f ,(.653h)
3" Well: () (.367h) ......_ ___ __,
Conductance (avg) Z. 8'-11 ~_....;;~~------------1 pHofWater(avg) {;,g7 ......_--~----------~
Well Water Temp. (avg) I 11. 'Z.. ~ Redox Potential (Eh)l z 7' Turbidlly._l _o __ ___.
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. ·c (prior sampling event)._l _2.__:'1_0 _ __......
Time I 1'13, I Gal. Purged I 0 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I -z..g 'i 7 I pH I ~.g/ I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. oc 117,'2."\ I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I L-1b I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. oc I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 0 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q . in gpm .
S/60 = I 18 .D
Time to evacuate two casin g volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated D
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ]._..A..._W'-""'A:..:L;..._ _____ _,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate
Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below)
VOCs D D 3x40 ml
Nutrients C(l D 100 ml
Heavy Metals D D 250 ml
All Other Non Radiologies D D 250 ml
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml
Other (specify) 129 D Sample volume
Chlo("J,
Final Depth .__] _s _c;....:...' 1_5 ___ _. Sample Time
Comment
Arr;ved o" s;+~ ~+ lY3Y. ---r::fln~r ~··J
~*''""fld colledcJ ~+ lY~o. \,Vo-..-\-e<"
C on+;f1V\OV\S
TWN-02 08-27-2013 ]D not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Filtered Preservative Type Preservative Added
y N y N
D D HCL D D
D ~ H2S04 51 D
D D HN03 D D
D D No Preserv. D D
D D HN03 D D
0 5l 0 lil
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
See instruction
2 of 2
Mill-Grout~~ater Discharge Permit Oate:04/04/13 Rev. 1.:
Gr.oundwatet Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan {QAP}
ATTACHMENT l-2 -~RQYI'U6Z.41 WHITE J.\.fESA URANIUM MILL Sec instruction
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description ofSampJing Event: I 3:-J: Q ·u..o.dcr ,J\.\-r-o.fc::. -z:Dl~
Location (well name): ._I _li..:......:.;W::..~.N..::.· _-.:::0~0<----------' Sampler Name
and initials: I -:r$Nmer &oll:(\(;'j/TJt
field Sample ID
Date and Time ~or Purging ~.-1 _--:;f5.:..../..;;:z:_:.7.._/.;;_ZD __ '-'I~::;;,__ __ __. and Smnpling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: OOpump or [QJ bailer Wen Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: 002 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event I Qv.c"(Ofc,-:6 N ;:}~"de. PTev. Well Smnpled in Sampling Event ~...l _""''_w_Al_-_l_g _____ .J
pH Buffer 7.0 -r.o pH Buffer4.0
Specific Conductance ._I --'"1-'-qj...__ __ ___.h.tl'vlliOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): L~..:....:~=---c_o __ _.
Depth to Water Before Purging I ~ 7. bC:. Casing Volume (V) 4" Well;,3&.0j j<-53h)
3" Well:_ 0 (.367h) '-----~
Conductance (avg) 2. '-\54 '--~~~-----~ pH of Water (avg) 7 .12
Wetl Water Temp. (avg) I IS. 2.5 Redox Potential. (Eh I -z.$.'"1 Turbid"t l ~... ....;:'2=..!1 __ ,...~
Weather Cond. Ext'! Amb. Temp. •c (prior sampling even ll Z...,"
Time I J3'S?... I Gal. Purged 1 'i~. :so I Time I I GaL Purged I I
Condw;:t()llce I 2.::1 ~z I pH I '1 -1 2. I Conductance I I pRJ I
Temp. oc I 1.5.25 I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eb (mV) I z..S~ I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity {NTU) I z.l I Turbidity (NTU) I J
Time I Ob4~ I Gal. Purged I 0 I Time I o '-"1'1 I Gal. Purged l o I
Conductance fz.~qz.. I pH l7.17' I Conductance I z.j ~' I pB 17 .15 I
Temp. oc I 19 :1'1 I Temp. oc l ll./.7'3 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) [ I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Work$heet for Groundwater A 1 of2 Capturx· COIIP .. TIBlE WITH.....-"-<,..,._.Ii:--·FU~CT I ONAliT
Mill! Grourn!".tlter Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7 3
Groundwater MonitoringQt~allty A$Svrance Plan (QAP)
Vol~e ofWatcr Purged gallon(s}
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q). in gpnt
S/60 == ._I __,_I _._I __ _..
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Tiine to evacuate two cnsing volumes (2 V)
T=2V/Q= I t;,q?., I
I 1. 2'1
199.50
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory i[Other Than Energy Labs 1'-"""/t""'".\J_,_A"-'l..;....._ ____ _,
S1m1ple Taken Samptc Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if otbcr lhan as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y
VOCs [J p 3>:40ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients lXI 0 l00m1 0 [J H2S04 l5il
Heavy Metals '0 0 250 inl 0 0 H.N03 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Presenr. D
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 tnl 0 0 HN03 q
Other (specify) IE. 0 J Sample volume 0 crJ 0
Gh1or :ac If prc~c:rvative is used, specifY
Type and QunntityofPrescrvative:
Final Depth ._I ~....:...'-t...:.J'.::::c(;.3.oo=-__ ___, Sample Time
I See insm1ction
!Comment
Arri\)eA 01"\ ~J-=. ~+ I~Y3 ~nncr .· ~f\J C-r....rr~.,.. pr-esent" t;r 'P<.;.("&C-pi.M"~<. be:j"'n u-J-1'5'18'
p v..1'~eJ. ~..Veil -"r y M~,~h~ Mc;l 30 s~<onJ.s. pl.l.f'~e! well dr~ 1. P .... r-~c= enJeJ ~+ l:l52,
~cthr w~ c.l-cc.~r. Left 5t'h: e,.f 13.5'
N
0
0
0
0
0
F$l
Af"";"~ .,,... ~~·h .. t.\t" 6t.~£{, -r;.M,r-i'\t'IA &~,,~";'"~ f're~ell t. -to c.., li-ed· ~~Niplcs 1 Deptl. ro ~Jt.t:kr Wci..s
~7.0b, .So-rY\pl~ bc~..'leJ "\+ 0bli3. Left -.s.N-e ct1-0&'-jb
,__ ______________ ____, Do not touch this ceU (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 on r:a,n ... lr"V-,.-0"\U~a.T•at ~ W-ITU • .A-_,..,4----r-t~U,.'ri ...... .W.t.~ l't
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I 31"2~; Qy..M+c:r "'J •f r~~tc. 2013
See instruction
Location (well name): ~.-I I'....;..._\V~N_-_0--'Y:..__ ________ ___,
Sampler Name
and initials: I ~,a/' H.,JJ.J.,,;/,-1/
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I ~/27/Z..ol~ and Sampling (if different) ~.--,_/._'/;..;.:4 ________ _.
Well Purging Equip Used: (![]pump or @]bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) G-r"'"J f~ ~~~~--------~
Purging Method Used: ~2 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event I Qv.,(t..r"icrlj 1\J;frCA.=f<-Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event ._I_~_J _w_A>_-_0_7 _____ __.
pH Buffer 7.0 70 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance ~.-1 ...:q...:..~,.!..----~11-lMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): I '25.7D
Depth to Water Before Purging I 4 g , '() 4" Well:' .SO. 3'i 1(.653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) L--------'
Casing Volume (V)
Conductance (avg) \055 pH of Water (avg) 7, 1.5
Well Water Temp. (avg) lL-1.76 Redox Potential (Eh)l '2...YS TurbidityL-1 _,€"-'Lf.__ _ _,
Weather Cond. Ext'l Am b. Temp. oc (prior sampling event)L-1 'U __ 6 _ __.
Time I l't OLj I Gal. Purged I ~ "M I Time I lt:...l5' I Gal. Purged I I•.:> I
Conductance I lOS{, I pH I 7. l.s I Conductance I 10~7 I pHI 7./.(. I
Temp. oc 1 1q.1 z I Temp. oc I 19. n? I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I Lq5 I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 2.'{(, I
Turbidity (NTU) I g:5. I Turbidity (NTU) I 8l.l I
Time I )20'-I Gal. Purged I 12.1 I Time 1 1'2.07 I Gal. Purged [ ~~~ I
Conductance I 105q I pH I 7.1:b I Conductance I lo:59 I pH[ 7 1'Z I
Temp. oc I 19.7, I Temp. oc I 19. 7~ I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I Z:9 b I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I z86 I
Turbidity (NTU) I ~q I Turbidity (NTU) I ~'i. I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = ._I ____,_)!:....__ __ __.
Time to evacuate two ca ·ing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = 14' r.:s I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) b
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 0
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients lJJ D 100 ml D rn H2S04 [!] D
Heavy Metals D D 250m] D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologies D D 250ml D D No Preset-v . D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) £11 D Sample volume 0 1:!1 0 1!1
G).,\oril<
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth ._ls_3_._5_b ___ _, Sample Time
See instruction
Comment
Arr; \lc~ 01\ ~;tc ~ t 115() ~,.,ntr ,...,}. G-.,..r,;n pr-c.srllf" ~r yv.r~e. a.,..j .S'lt>~_pJ:J f!:Ui!:nf.
P\Ar~e bGj""" 11-+ IIS5.. Pu..r-~e.~ well -tor t~o-+ot~l or;' 12. M ·nv..it..s. w o.+cr w"'.s 01 /,)1-/(
IV!v..r\t,~. ?v-r ~t:. et~J.e~ IV'\,}. Sg,Mplc~ collcd·e-~ A} )207. L~A-5•-te (.\ t-12./(>.
TWN-04 08-27-2013 !Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I 3 r-tx Q v..CJ-<4e r N ;+..-~=tc. zo 1'3
J See instruction
Location (well name): ._I _Ti_W_AJ_-_o_7 _________ __J
Sampler Name
and initials: I --=r;.M~r Hoi I J~Aii
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I ft I z. 7 I Z01.3 and Sampling (if different) <§/zg/zor3
Well Purging Equip Used: (Q]pump or IQJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: [QJ2 casings IQJ3 casings
Sampling Event I Q..,..,r::Jo!r-6 A),'fr(A,+c.. Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event ._I ~ __ w_w_-_0_1 _____ ___,
pH Buffer 7.0 7. "0 pH Buffer 4.0 L/.0
Specific Conductance ._I _GJ_1_t:t_· ___ ___.1~-tMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): I /OS, 00
Depth to Water Before Purging I g7, 05 Casing Volume (V) 4'' Well:l II. 72 1(.653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) ..__ ___ __,
Conductance ( avg) .____.....:....:\ 2~S_~..:....._ _____ -.J pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I IS. &f. Redox Potential (Eh)._l_2 _-z_.s __ _, Turbidity._l_--s_o_· __ _,
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling event)L..Iz_g....:...._e ____
Time I \0'-\G! I Gal. Purged I I~ I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I 1-z.s.q I pH I 7.~11 I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc 115 · 2)5 I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I z.-u::. I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I ~0 I Turbidity (NTU) l ]
Time I o'-3' I Gal. Purged I 0 I Time I Ob32 I Gal. Purged I " I
Conductance I \:L."L5 I pH I 7.l5Z: I Conductance 112:30 I pHI .,._ 1.!5
I
Temp. oc I I5}:Y~ I Temp. °C ps .'l~ I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ~ ''-· I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan {QAP)
[S £
Volume ofWater'P~~~ gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate{Q) in gpm.
S/60 = ._I _T ..... I ___ __,
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V /Q = I z_ I 13 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) l l.l9
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 1 ..... 1'-Y ___ _,
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ul A-=---\J_IA_L ______ __,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients '[] 0 lOOml 0 I!J H2S04 rJ 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume 0 19 0 tJ
c,nlo,..;clc.
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth l,__l 0_'3_5_1 __ _~ Sample Time
See instruction
Comment
~rr'll~~ on sif~ ()-)-IOLJY. ~,.,na tM,j.. &ur:n prc.sc""t for f"r~e. 'P""r~~ bc:jo" 01 f }OY.8
?v.r~e~ v,:)el\ for f?o.. +o+~\ of I 1"'\inv'A-c ,._r.J,. 2..0 :5.CC01'1Gh. P\.Ar~-e~ well dr~.
\.0~1-c:\ \NCA~ c.\e:o.c. fv..i(~:f· cnJea Q\.1 10'19. Le.-R-s.~+c o.+ 1051
frrr~\JcA on ~;+~ "T Ob1.7. -(,..11 "'"" ",a CrMr:" pre~~~~ f-To c.ollt!<.+ S~~t,.,p/rs dc..ftJ. fa w~~fer
wo.~ "fb,'3g. ~o111 pl~ c.olledeJ ~1 06. ~;1... Left ~,tc c;;.t o~3Y
TWN-07 08-27-2013 lDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I 3r<X. Q.,.o.;:fc,.. A.) fYi r.:>.+c: 2..) •3
Location (well name): I ""T\,JJJ-tg ~~~-=~----------------~
Field Sample ID
Sampler N arne
and initials:
See instruction
Date and Time for Purging I 'b/27/zo 13 and Sampling (if different) [._Al __ /._A ________________ _,
Well Purging Equip Used: (][]pump or [ID bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1.__6-_r_,._,_J-'-"\>-'os,__ ______ __,
Purging Method Used: [!!]2 casings [ID3 casings
Sampling Event [ Gv-o.rtc:(' G /Ji{c,,Jc:: Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event I ~------------------~
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 4.0
Specific Conductance ._I _'1..;...9.;...j.__ ______ _,l [!MHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): I 14 5. DD
Depth to Water Before Purging I .S8. 6£ Casing Volume (V) 4" Wellll ~b.3t 1(.653h)
3" Well: b (.367h) .......__ ___ ~
Conductance (avg) z-z:z.l ~----------------~ pH of Water (avg)
WellWaterTemp.(avg) I \Y.b.S Redox Potential (Eh)l 2.13 Turbidity! t..S5
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. ·c (prior sampling event)l.._1-...:.7_"_-.~
Time I ll.;, I Gal. Purged I ~9 I Time [12.'1 6 I Gal. Purged I JJO I
Conductance I L"2.L'-\ I pH I b ;'1-!:> I Conductance I 2.(.?.7 I pH 1 c.~J I
Temp. oc I ''"" ~)""7 I Temp. oc I J9.GC I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I'Ll"'.) I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I "<.73 I
Turbidity (NTU) I "Z...!:lU I Turbidity (NTU) I Z~3 I
Time 1 l2t;.'l I Gal. Purged I I Z.l I Time 1125o I Gal. Purged 1 11 z: I
Conductance I -z.7..'l:~ I pH I G."1 7 I Conductance I 'l..Z3'Z I pH I C-93 I
Temp. oc I lq' 1:9 I Temp. oc I 1 t1. C9 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I z."l'i I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I Z74 I
Turbidity (NTU) I Z"S 7 I Turbidity (NTU) I 'Z€;Z5 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q). in gpm.
S/60 = ._I ----'1'-'-1 __ _..
Time to evacuate two ca. ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= l 1c.zs I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) I o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated I o
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs 1._-'/_,_]W-'---"-A_,_L _____ _,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D
Nutrients CJ D 100 ml D
Heavy Metals D D 250m! D
All Other Non Radiologies D D 250m! D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D
Other (specify) IE 0 Sample volume 0
G hlor;d(_
Final Depth I "0 , SS Sample Time '2.50
Comment
Arr;\l~J
? v-r~c.c\
~(1~
M s ·~t:. .Qt l"Z.3 S. ""T:,..,c-,. ~,...J. G-,.rr;" pre~of -\or
\1\)e.l\ .for u.. to-l-~\ o~ 12.. J"''··t1v.+C'~. W01.1"cr w~~
~.-.""PI~~ c..ollc.c.+cj l)i..+ 12...SD. Le-R-s.:+~ ~+
TWN-18 08-27-2013 loo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N y
D HCL D
~ H2S04 ~
D HN03 D
D No Preserv. D
D HN03 D
~ 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
See instruction
pu.r,~ ~e~o.n .,.,_ + )2.38
Mv.rk~. Pu.'jc e.,Jcd
l "2..S I.. I
N
D
D
D
D
D
1:.9
2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I 3 rJ-. G I) r,c=h:.r ,.y ,-t Ct-. r G,... 2-o I '3
Sampler N arne
Location (well name): I T\,/N-' 60 and initials:
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging l.__-f.g,_l~2 .... 7__........l_.;;2:;:;.·"'-o ... l:$::..--_ ____, and Sampling (if different)
See instruction
Well Purging Equip Used: OOpump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: [QJ2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I G, ,4 cy,..c\y A}; b-,.Jr:. i'<cv I Well Sampled in SampHng Event l-rw .A/-D :<.
pH Buffer 7.0 :ZT 0 pH Buffer 4.0 V\.,12
Specific Conductance l.___q.._q....:.........Lg __ ___,lf!MHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): D
Depth to Water Before Purging 1.._ _ __,0""-_ ___. Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:~-~0::.__--;,(.653h)
3" Well:_ Q _(.367h)
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) Redox Potential (Eh)l 2 50 Turbidity I....__ .... (')..._ _ _.
Weather Cond. Ext' I Am b. Temp. oc (prior sampling event) I \ qd
Time I 15\2 I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I _2.5 I pH I 1 .. 6 I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I ·2£99!.. I Temp. oc I I 2.C>. 'I~
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I :2.$.0 r Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I D I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 0 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q) in gpm.
S/60 = I 0
Time to evacuate two a ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 0
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D
Nutrients ~ D 100 ml D 81 H2S04 lSI
Heavy Metals D D 250 ml D D HN03 D
All Other Non Radiologies D D 250 ml D D No Preserv_ D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D
Other (specify) [)!] D Sample volume D ~ 0
1.. ciA \ e> r ; r...ll'. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth ._I --'0""""--. __ ____. Sample Time ) 515
Comment
A·n-·tvc.rA. OJ'-s;+c.. e....r 1505.
(}..oAJ~ L.o\ I c..t..~-e.J.. > &..vV\p le-.S,
DI
(u ... ~ ... ; .... pr~Sl-11'--Y (!.or .S~vVI-p \ ;~,
Lt..~ t-.sl+c. ~+-152o.
TWN-60 08-27-2013 !Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
See instruction
N
D
D
D
D
D
~
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I '3 r.a Q v-o...rte r /J ;fr~h:. 2.0 13
Location (well name): 1~.-I.....;....;W.;..JJ_-_b...:::C~------------'
Field Sample ID 1..,-w N-t;s_ o a z7z.o 1.3
Sampler Name
and initials:
~ See instruction
Date and Time for Purging I <t,/27/2oD and Sampling (if different) )11/.4 ~~~-------~
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump or ~bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I G-fu.f7J+~.:.>
Purging Method Used: cm::J2 casings ~3 casings
Sampling Event I Q"'"''""fer l; .N A(.af~ Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event I 'fwAJ -0/
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0
Specific Conductance ._I _4_~....;.q ____ _.l ~-tMHOS/ em
Depth to Water Before Purging ._I ----'11..._% ....... _G...;;;;O _ _,
Conductance (avg) l055
pH Buffer 4.0 Y.O
Well Depth(O.Olft): I 125.{0
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4'' Well:' 50.3Lj 1.(.653h)
3" W ell:.__ ......;;..o __ ___,.j. (.367h)
/,15
Well Water Temp. (avg) I 1'1.7$ Redox Potential (Eh)l '2..1..\S TurbidHyl ~LJ
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling event)!._ _2._,_0
_ ___,
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) .I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I r Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. °C I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I J Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 13'2. gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate {Q). in &f rn.
S/60 = I II
Time to evacuate two ca it1 g volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I "\.15 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) D
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated D
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients l:il D 100 ml D I:CI H2S04 lSI D
Heavy Metals D D 250 ml D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologies D D 250m! D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) I'll D Sample volume D lil D l:il
Chlo,;J.c If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I 53' 5b Sample Time 121>7
See instruction
Comment
TWN-65 08-27-2013 !Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
See instruction
De~riptiooclSamplingE~nt ~~~~r~~Q~~-•_r_f~c_r~C~h~l~o~r~o~~~0~rm~~2_o~p~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sampler Name
Location (well name): l.__-J;_w;..,;;_4'---'Z.:...'Z:...-~~~~~~---> and initials: 1-r;nn,,-Ho n~·J.u.J h'}r
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging J ._ _'i_,_,_/~::::....<-/...:7.:...;.0...:13;:..._ __ ~~--~
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump or [QJ bailer
Purging Method Used: ~2 casings @]3 casings
pH Buffer 7.0 I, 0
Specific Conductance ._l _'i"-'~'-~~~~~-'J~-tMHOS/ em
Depth to Water Before Purging l S 7,SD
Conductance (avg)
and Sampling (if different) ~...v._:/,_!.',4~~~~--~~--J
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I C.oni;I)IADlA.S
I J'wY-21...1 Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event ..... ~~~~~~~~~---'
pH Buffer 4.0 Y.o
Well Depth(O.Olft): I \13.5 0
Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:l 3'-. .sb l(.653h)
3" Well:~.-. _..).;:.._ _ __._(.367h)
pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) l7.lo Redox Potential (Eh)j '7..5 'f Turbidity J () .S
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling eventl._l '2._7 _6
_ __.
Time I \30'-1 I Gal. Purged I 0 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I Go:t] I pH I 6'. 9 Lj I Conductance I I pH j I
Temp. °C I ll .. ro I Temp. °C I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 2 S::!::l I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I d,,5 I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. oc I I Temp. °C I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) ) I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) ( I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q) in gif)1.
S/60 = I l ~. D
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 0 I
0
()
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs AWAl
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs 01 D 3x40 ml D !11 HCL QJ D
Nutrients l1J D 100 ml D rn H2S04 [21 D
Heavy Metals D D 250m! D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologies D D 250m! D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D I,OOOml D D HN03 D 0
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume D cg 0 []
chlof;J~ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth 1...__7_3_,_4_1 __ __. Sample Time
See instruction
Comment
ltr r.-vc~ Of\ sih. "+ 11.51. \,.nncr """'~ G-.. ,,:;1 Pr,~n+ ~..... +o c.c.Jl~cf
~~~pk~ collc-c.t-~ 4 ~ I36S , Le.ft S•+c c_f-l367 wo..+c.r we.~
TW4-22 09-03-2013 I D not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I ;:.'""' Ov. .... rfcr C...Y. loro+oriVI ~o o
Location (well name): ~...l-r'_\N_\..)....:..__-...:;Z;...'-l:..__ ________ --J
Field Sample ID
Sampler Name
and initials:
l ( See instruction
Date and Time for Purging ._I _4..:..f_3_/_z._o_J_3 _____ _. and Sampling (if different) L.l ;_.;v:;_:.-::...;..;4.:__ _______ ,_~
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump or @] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) k_.ot1 J:;fli.J0\11.~
Purging Method Used: (][]2 casings @ 3 casings
Sampling Event I Q ........ Ac..-1~ Chloro+o<"M Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event L.l-r_W_'i_-_z_S ______ _~
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 Y.O
Specific Conductance ~...l 'l....:..4..L.9..:._ ___ -Jl~-tMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): ~...I I_J _Z_. s_o __ _,
Depth to Water Before Purging l ~5-, 7 D Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:l 3 O.S-b ,(.653h)
3" Well:_ o . (.367h) '--------"
Conductance (avg) 8'2'-17 pH of Water (avg) c. 73
Well Water Temp. (avg) \7.11 Redox Potential (Eh)j 'Z5q TurbidityLI _o_-__ _.J
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling event) I Z/b
Time I I~Sy I Gal. Purged I ..:> I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I ~2';/ I pH I r:' 7....5 I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. oc I 17 · II I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I zs9 I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I '() I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. oc I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume ofWaterPurged 0 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q , in gpm.
S/60 = 1-l _1_8 .....;.' q __ __,
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 0
Name of Ce11ified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y
VOCs ~ 0 3x40 ml 0 1!1 HCL fJ
Nutrients [I 0 100 ml 0 1!1 H2S04 ~
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250ml 0 D No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha D 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) lE 0 Sample volume 0 tJ 0
(:h\or~dc.
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth ._I b_~_. _1.3 ___ _. Sample Time
See instruction
Comment
Arr:\ld on 5 1lc ...... +
.S~t.rtlple~ c.oll.::ctd ~+
IZY8, --),..,fla-~I"'J G-,w .'(l rrc~cnf -to c..oJiecf .s. .. ,fJc S.
\2.55 . Lc..R s:tc. 1'..+ 1'2.5/, wa-ter WO\.S. c..J~AI
TW4-24 09-03-2013 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
D
0
~
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: J '3.~"zX Q ...>-o.rfCr C.h l oro:t:orl'V! L..o l~
See instruction
Location (well name): ._l--r..:.......;W'--'-\.:...-_L.___::S:....._ ________ __,
Sampler Name
and initials: Fr;:,(l,,. Ft JI.d".::i/71l
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I '\/3/Zol) and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: [Q]pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: @ 2 casings [g]3 casings
Sampling Event J Qv.c.orhc-1~ G}, l.:>rOfSrM Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event Ll_--rw __ Y_-_1_'1 ______ _,
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 L..J.O
Specific Conductance Ll_1;...1:....;~~-----li[A.MHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): j l3Y.8'0
Depth to Water Before Purging I (:, S. ~D 4" WclJ:l ~L!.tf'f ,(.653h)
3" Well: o (.367h) ..__ ___ __.
Casing Volume (V)
Conductance (avg) '----'--=8_1.5=--------' pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I J(;, '17 Redox Potential (Eh)j 275 Turbidity! 0 · t
Weather Cond. Ext' IAmb. Temp. ·c (prior sampling event)Lj-z_7_1J _ __J
Time I iL3 q I Gal. Purged I 0 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I 28Zj:S I pH I i."Z7 I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. oc [lt .Gl 7 I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 'Z7S I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I o. g I Turbidity (NTU) l J
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pH J I
Temp. °C I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 0 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q in gpm.
S/60 = I \8.0
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Ia
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ._I A'--W_A-_L ______ __.
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added if other than as Preservative Type Type of Sample
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs ID 0 3x40 ml 0 t!l HCL ~ 0
Nutrients Ill 0 lOOml D J[J H2S04 [I D
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 D HN03 0 D
All Other Non Radiologies D 0 250ml D 0 No Preserv. 0 D
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 D
Other (specify) tJ 0 Sample volume 0 19 0 ~
Ch'o,;Jc If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
.
Final Depth .._I 7..:...=S .:_,4w.l __ _.. Sample Time }1.'-j{)
See instruction
Comment
TW4-25 09-03-2013 lDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: l 3 rA Q ~rfc:r C..h I or o-fo rfVI -z.o13
See instruction
Location (well name): .... 1--rw __ ~-'---f._O __________ __,
Sampler Name
and initials: 1 -=t"'-'~nc.r fl oll o'J~/"fH
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging l 'lhziz..oo and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: @]pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: @]2 casings @)3 casings
SamplingEvent IO VI o..({c.rlj Ci-JiorOf'or iY) l-rw4-0"'Z... Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event ,__ _________ ___,
pH Buffer 7.0 l'-_7_._o ___ ---J pH Buffer 4.0 Y ,o
Specific Conductance ._I _4:_"f:...J1e--___ _.l f!MHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): l.__o ___ ____,
Depth to Water Before Purging ... 1 __ 0 __ _, Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:,,____,0 ___ ,1(.653h)
3" Well:_ D _(.367h)
Conductance (avg) 0,5 pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I Z-3, -z.~ Redox Potential (Eh)~..l _1 _G>_l __ _, Turbidity~..! _6 __ --J
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. ·c (prior sampling event),__l-z._J4
__ _,
Time I (J ~ tfll I Gal. Purged I C> I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I D .~ I pH I i ,S;j I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. °C I Z3.V I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) i ltl I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance l I pH I I Conductance I I pH l I
Temp. oc I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged D gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q • in gpm.
S/60 = ._I __ o ___ _,
Time to evacuate two ca. ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated l o
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs ~ D 3x40 ml D 0 HCL ~ D
Nutrients tlJ 0 lOOm! 0 [!] H2S04 ~ D
Heavy Metals D D 250ml D 0 HN03 0 D
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250m] 0 D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1.000 ml D 0 HN03 D D
Other (specify) ID 0 Sample volume 0 m 0 (61
c..vd ,rJc If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth '-1 _ _:0:..._ __ __. Sample Time
See instruction
Comment
TW4-60 09-12-2013 lno not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
TabC
Kriged Current Quarter Groundwater Contour Map and Depth to Water Summary
@ estimated dry area
MW·5 perched monitoring well showing
.5503 elevation In feet amsl
TW4•12 temporary perched monitoring well
0 5582 showing elevation In feet amsl
TWN·7 A temporary perched nitrate monitoring v 5562 well showing elevation in feet amsl
PIEZ·1 perched piezometer showing
& 5593 elevation In feet amsl
TW4·32 temporary perched monitoring well
~5564 installed September, 2013 showing
approximate elevation In feet amsl
RUIN SPRING o 5380 seep or spring showing
elevation In feet amsl
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
KRIGED 3rd QUARTER, 2013 WATER LEVELS
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE REFERENCE
H:/718000fnov131Uw10913.srf
FIGURE
C-1
MW-4
.5553
TW4·1
0 5554
PIEZ-2
Wl 5596
perched monitoring well showing
elevation in feet amsl
temporary perched monitoring well
showing elevation in feet amsl
perched piezometer showing
elevation in feet amsl
TW4-32 temporary perched monitoring well
~ 5564 installed September, 2013 showing
elevation in feet amsl
NOTE: MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19, and TW4-20 are chloroform pumping wells;
TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 are nitrate pumping wells
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
KRIGED 3rd QUARTER, 2013 WATER LEVELS
WHITE MESA SITE
(detail map)
APPROVED DATE REFERENCE FIGURE
H :/718000/nov13/Uwl0913det.srf C-2
TIME
1339
1416
1356
1357
800
805
823
757
815
1352
1342
1347
950
921
1059
1413
807
1317
1334
1409
1419
1422
1425
1338
1415
830
1420
1417
833
WELL
MW-1
MW-2
MW-3
MW-3A
MW-5
MW-11
MW-12
MW-14
MW-15
MW-17
MW-18
MW-19
MW-20
MW-22
MW-23
MW-24
MW-25
MW-26
MW-27
MW-28
MW-29
MW-30
MW-31
MW-32
MW-33
MW-34
MW-35
MW-36
MW-37
Static
level
63.78
109.50
82.77
84.79
106.46
87.28
108.55
103.60
106.48
72.96
70.39
57.25
85.20
66.78
114.28
113.70
73.26
65.33
52.38
75.70
101.33
74.90
67.15
73.89
DRY
108.11
112.30
110.35
109.41
Name: Garrin Palmer, Tanner Holliday
Date: 9/27/2013
TIME WELL
1331 MW-4
1332 TW4-1
1206 TW4-2
1323 TW4-3
1345 TW4-4
1320 TW4-5
1343 TW4-6
1329 TW4-7
1325 TW4-8
1321 TW4-9
1318 TW4-10
1203 TW4-11
1215 TW4-12
1217 TW4-13
1219 TW4-14
1317 TW4-15
1336 TW4-16
1338 TW4-17
1327 TW4-18
1205 TW4-19
1315 TW4-20
1329 TW4-21
1230 TW4-22
1210 TW4-23
1232 TW4-24
1331 TW4-25
1347 TW4-26
1237 TW4-27
1234 TW4-28
1240 TW4-29
1242 TW4-30
1244 TW4-31
1247 TW4-32
1250 TW4-33
1252 TW4-34
Static
Level
69.78
64.21
65.46
51.65
68.90
59.35
69.16
64.98
64.80
57.09
57.47
57.70
41.99
46.48
85.09
65.33
61.75
73.89
59.90
63.02
61.00
58.46
56.75
64.25
57.82
59.00
62.74
80.90
36.65
71.77
77.27
83.36
47.41
70.30
69.30
TIME WELL
1350 PIEZ-1
1359 PIEZ-2
1322 PIEZ-3
1429 PIEZ-4
1432 PIEZ-5
1405 TWN-1
1312 TWN-2
1315 TWN-3
1320 TWN-4
NA TWN-5
1344 TWN-6
1336 TWN-7
NA TWN-8
NA TWN-9
NA TWN-10
NA TWN-11
NA TWN-12
NA TWN-13
1352 TWN-14
NA TWN-15
1355 TWN-16
NA TWN-17
1317 TWN-18
1041 TWN-19
We split up to complete checks so some times may be the same.
Static
Level
62.61
32.43
46.90
49.12
45.75
56.44
32.31
37.14
48.54
Abandon
75.95
86.85
Abandon
Abandon
Abandon
Abandon
Abandon
Abandon
61.81
Abandon
47.31
Abandon
58.43
52.44
TIME WELL Static Level
NA DR-1 Abandon
NA DR-2 Abandon
1017 DR-S 82.96
1020 DR-6 94.21
1236 DR-7 92.21
1012 DR-8 51
1009 DR-9 86.4
1006 DR-10 77.97
1026 DR-11 98.1
1028 DR-12 89.62
1031 DR-13 69.76
959 DR-14 76.29
955 DR-15 92.8
NA DR-16 Abandon
1002 DR-17 64.82
NA DR-18 Abandon
939 DR-19 62.97
941 DR-20 55.35
924 DR-21 101.19
935 DR-22 60.65
945 DR-23 70.56
932 DR-24 43.85
NA DR-25 Abandon
)
Time Well
132~. MW-4
i32£ MW-26
JLioS" TW4-19
1311 TW4-20
· i.3.2A TW4-4
IY.~ TWN-2
l :'313 TW4-22
J~Of? TW4-24
I {}-5?-. TW4-25
Weekly Inspection Form
Depth* Comments
74 1.{~ Flow I..L~3 6PA
Meter 1350 75 . .:20
6l .. AO Flow I 0.6 CP~
Meter 338555,37
6 "L 7;z._ Flow I L.l ~ ~ f....v\.
Meter ' .:2 7 .1.S_o 'l. o .3
.5«1.R6 Flow g,.5 6PP'\
Meter 57.3.3:3 ~~ 2.1
/0 . f/6 Flow g.3 bP.}A..
Meter 12qoq~.SD
31~70 Flow IS.6 f.,f'.~
Meter SN:L$i.SO
56.~4. Flow iJJ.o &PA
Meter Ll "i2.CI. '-tO·
7f:'_o .:2.. Flow iD '2 AP..M
Meter 355'36 8. 0 ;z
6'o.IO Flow I.B.;Z. Gf>A
Meter :!l67'1~7 .5o
System Operational (If no note
anv problems/corrective actions)
rf98) No
~No
[Ye~ No
~No
~No
~No --~No
[YeS) No
------=::
(Ye~ No
(YeS) No
(Ye~ No
(eS) No
(Ve~No
{YeS) No
~es) No
<:JeS) No
'"=--C[~No
(Yes) No -
Operational Problems (Please list well number): 1w=1-:1~ Tt....>'-1 -Gk> ~lpw tA-+e. borfc-J....
!o,)c:.-'-(c..S be-G-.-~vce-M_.,lhflr. l..ee)o!:tl.s W<c< fv-M-f :-::1 .a.t ti,..._C..
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): c. l--.~"':1-c.J.. ~; """"c.s-o-·h.J "-l -;:? 4 , ._, • 1 I
e.o.-+;"'-,.2c ·h.? ;.........,,...;tar £low il"a-tc:S.
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.0'1 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
Date 7/8/13 Name 6••d* f•leM.c.t, "("'':re=cr He!!;.L.y
System Operational (If no note
Time Well Depth* Comments anv problems/corrective actions)
oqqq MW-4 ~7 7' Flow c.f,3 ~No
Meter \':,q3.633/ C~ No
Cf7if5 MW-26 c.:z. 90 Flow 10 .2 CJJi~ No
Meter 3LJ613S .~ 1 (ve} No
ID~O TW4-19 IO.D_:L Flow ..... ~ ,,~ (f9SJ No
Meter 124t 7.i~& 00 lfSS)No
-::::,
oqq!) TW4-20 ~6 .'-S Flow Cf.$ Cvei) No
Meter S7 '15b50.bD ( Yei) No
..--
·Dqs] TW4-4 ~ Flow 8.0 (Y~ No
h1,bTS Meter l-:>2g'1LttD ~s No
....
012.-/ TWN-2 34.70 Flow lt.S ~v_ei)No
Meter 8 7Z S ~ .30 "-Y_es) No
-
6f!~k TW4-22 Sb.gh Flow 1& -;2.. (YSS')No
Meter '1S6} g .~0 ( YeS')No
~
O'i.J2... TW4-24 (;~.YO Flow lg'.l cYesJ No
Meter 370.5']{)70 C: v~ No
C42.2. TW4-25 -,1.1.• Flow 1g .z C!es ~o . Meter .!1.£"76.2.4 .... ~ cY95'\No
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): --------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
Time Well -Depth*' Comments
I "t I'-\ MW-4 t t. I~ Flow l/,'t; 6i?.A
Meter l"1Yt6o 6 .t-
I'"SD~ MW-26 6:2 SA. Flow 10_0 t.,.P/A.
Meter 34.2\(}7. qS('
iJ45 TW4-19 61 . I 'i Flow I li.oo 6i>~
Meter \ ;; .1. 7 5" q ~ '06
1306 TW4-20 ~0.1\ Flow S'-i.l 6 p _,v\
Meter S76D£~ ol
L5l7 TW4-4 71 _ L{D Flow -1.5-b. P..M-
Meter J 375'1(. I)O
l:Z.S--l TWN-2 32. oc Flow \q_ l 6P.M
Meter q0'1't l 30
I~L7:J. TW4-22 t;.t., -zr; Flow i SL t.-1 ~p-""
Meter Y7<:t13 6.:>
t.2£1S TW4-24 f)LL2o Flow l~.t &P~
Meter 3'1ol!!l.R 20
l~!;D TW4-25 f.l 15 Flow l_g.s u·~
Meter 2?go:::z.6.o~-t
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
System Operational (If no note
anv problems/corrective actions)
(19~) No
?f8§) No
(Y_~ No
(1es) No
-,...
Cv~§) No
(Ye~ No -----(Yep No
/fesYJo -
Cfe§) No
(feS) No
(Ye~No
(feS) No -~No
(Ye§J No
(Yes) No
(fes) No
('0~ No
(fe§)No
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number):
------------------------~------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
Date
Time Well Depth* Comments
L3iO MW"4 1'2. 6~ Flow 3.1 &PA
Meter i.5oq61( ~3
L3t)6 MW-26 ~~ '2..0 Flow I D . .:> r,PA
Meter :34436i>_ 20
1'1~ TW4-19 ~b-.37 Flow 14.0 &PM
Meter i .36t$g' I • D 'I
t·~ol TW4-20 hi '10 Flow g.q 6PM
Meter 577/lo u1
. i-; I" TW4-4 S:J..6o Flow SlaV 6fJ./--'\
Meter I i.t.ZK.28 -:5'0
_t_:Z.I..\0 TWN-2 3.:2.65 Flow l fr .3 G.P,v\
Meter t.)5L>3i.Cj0
I '2. <"5' TW4-22 _57.00 Flow il.t: t<P.M
Meter _C:DD 65:. lO
1:2.1.('l TW4-24 6&.t.to Flow I !l'. o Gf!.JA.
Meter L.il3i.2g/o
12. ~:r.. TW4-25 A5.i7 Flow l q.D 1'-:PM..
Meter 2.cto 3lg .g-o
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
System Operational (If no note
anv problems/corrective actions)
(18~ No
{f9S) No
C{e~ No
(Ye~ No
~jr No
(Yes'1)No -
~ No
~No
('feSj No
@ No
c@ No
~ No
@ No
c1§) No
~ No
~ No
~No
((@ No
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ----------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
Time Well Depth* Comments
12.:S~ MW-4 ~7 , 7C.. Flow 3.2. CP~
Meter 1.554 2o t44
1230 MW-26 6 7~ L 7 Flow II? • 2._ (,p _;...;\__
Meter :>Y5'112 cro
t:SD7 TW4-19 ]6.~ Flow \4.6 &.P~ .-:L:t...""'1 .
Meter i .3F6 ~6'-{ .oo
/:22~ TW4-20 /1 . f?O Flow q_~ r:VA-
Meter .E'7S?o 7 -s . 9a
. i237 TW4-4 7D _ 10 Flow g_{) bP_.A,A.._
Meter I L-i6 8.' Y.S' '3. i-f
l~\3 TWN-2 sq.o'2, Flow I 73 ~6 Gf'J/A.
Meter qg:zL.\ 7 . 70
l J;L:l TW4-22 57.,13 Flow I Z.o f:P).A..
Meter 5i6IS f?t-1
i21g TW4-24 b LLifg Flow l .71 0 {;;(vt;\
Meter '-1 2. qq 7 .5. 36
JJ.o_"t TW4-25 ,<g_q6 Flow I~. I 6 v A
Meter 2. 'l 0tl-{l 8 40
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number):
System Operational (If no note
any problems/corrective actions}
~No
{Ve§) No
;feS) No
C'te§J No
('1~ No
{YeS) No
(J___es) No
(Ye~ No
~No
~ No -
Q'es)No
({eS) No -({9§) No
(res) No
-
C:Yes No
~No
(Y~ No
(Yes )No
-------------------------------.
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Monthly Depth Check Form
Date 7 i:s ol I J Name 6-<'-,_,..; ""'-fl"" \..<Ac.r, lr"""'"S:r Jicd\ ~d ·Y
Time Well Depth* Time Well Depth*
(l.f2 ~6 MW-4 6 ] 76. {;2631 TWN-1 56..\\
b(~3~ TW4-1 6t-L 35 ~6~'1 TWN-2 ~~-~'-'.
ob.J:S TW4-2 bS:-GO 06i.-\\ TWN-3 -~1.56
D7 12.. TW4-3 51 265 ~6 i.-{6 TWN-4 L-\6".1-J.
() 6. i-\ \ TW4-4 69. g z {26_53 TWN-7 '67. DO
b :Z 16. TW4-5 5'1 .35' a6:~3 TWN-18 5fL 61.
{)(;i..{ :2.. TW4-6 6:1 . .35 {.26_56 MW-27 ,5;.L51
OG_'J7 TW4-7 65~ i6 (271 '( MW-30 75,3.~
orLo TW4-8 6'5. i.Z (~ J 1.5 MW-31 ({7. '15'
071'-l TW4-9 5'7.0 ~ o6Si TW4-28 36. If'
0'71 g TW4-10 57. L):Z.. 665'( TW4-29 ~2.. !S
0633 TW4-11 s ·LII Q(o::L TW4-30 I 7 .._ '10
C>tli-J ~ TW4-12 '-"1 :2. I 0 TW4-31 gt..\,0\
66s-3 TW4-13 '-1/.S'O
{)_ 6.')5-TW4-14 95-6'0
C2_70'l TW4-15 6:s-.61
~]\0 TW4-16 a_'D.6D
£2:116 TW4-17 I :S.C! ;2.
~633 TW4-18 ~'1 . cl~
l:L"J. :30 TW4-19 6.C2-312
fXlQS TW4-20 6 1 .')..5
(26_31 TW4-21 S'tt .6~
(2702. TW4-22 57.15'
CY7D8 TW4-23 b L.\. 36
(2_ 6 S:8. TW4-24 6'4.DI
t>628 TW4-25 5"7.13
Dtj :{ TW4-26 b..1-&~
O?!S7 TW4-27 ~i . .5:2.
Comments: (Please note the well number for any comments)
5 O .AA<:... -H ,M.c..S ~y b t. +·be Sa"'""'-b L (..&..tJ.S ~ ,.}.,, a }-k.s WGlC.. h ·,.(L.e..A.
.S i .v\.v l·h :.."' =c..t> vs \y.
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet
Weekly Inspection Form
Time Well Depth* Comments
I :tS·c; MW-4 hJ? o I Flow 3 -2-6 p .;A.A.._
Meter _L6_oq6'L.65"
I .1..:5"1~-MW-26 75. 71-{ Flow if) .:') &e .AA.
Meter :S47gl?o . .<3
\316 TW4-19 6o. 4'-1. Flow I LLo &r?M
Meter J__..-j I :l-.3.3'1 ~ 00
_/_'2__~2 TW4-20 6:2. 8'-6 Flow \o_ L{ 6P_;Ul
Meter ..:·· t7 ,...,__ _L L --,. . o,,~
~7i'o 1.1 61 .o~
130~ TW4-4 70.DY Flow ~-:2. 1'$P~
Meter 15ls'i3 .oo
i 1-i Y.O TWN-2 3.2. \ q Flow I f:3. 6 (.. p .#\_
Meter \0/SS'6 to
i 4 y $5 TW4-22 F;7 --~-.5' Flow t~LY 6P/V\.
Meter (; :361-,7, 30
14'-l~ TW4-24 65-~ 10 Flow lt;.o &P_.u_
Meter '4 4 Cf :lR1_ 1/)
I 4 J.g TW4-25 57~9.5 Flow I~ h &P.JA-
Meter ~lo2.52 .C-fo
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
System Operational (If no note
anv problems/corrective actions)
@DNo
(fe~ No
~ No
~ No
C{e~ No
lf9S\ No
;fe§> No
?fe~ No
/YeS) No
~=N es o
' -(Yei) No
(Yes)_ No
{Ve§l No
_{Yes) No
......-...._.__
(Yes) No
T'fes ) No
((_~No
(ies, No ---
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ---------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
J
Weekly Inspection Form
Time Well Depth* Comments
I .2.'-i h MW-4 67.gt.-{ Flow 3 . .3 ~p~
Meter \6'61oo 2i
12'-13 MW-26 t5.6f{ Flow lO-l ,t;P_!~.A...
Meter 3 ~q 6 t.i ~-.OJ(
J }')..5 TW4-19 ,.< 6-Lt .2. Flow f'-l-d &f...v...
Meter I i..·P·-\6? 7 7 .DO
IJ..'-10 TW4-20 62. I 3-Flow 10.5 t;IA
Meter 5kii?ff)2 16
t2SD TW4-4 /D. 4.;2_ Flow 8.o /.,.P~
Meter 15.4lll. 2o
1"2./ TWN-2 3.5'_70 Flow i g . .( fA.JV\.
Meter 105"'\5.8 ~D
/1..3h TW4-22 57.35 Flow ,g_~ &f~
Meter ~t:;""('-..5-3
\ 1.3.2.. TW4-24 b5. ;q Flow I.B . o & p .,r.A--
Meter l~ ,.( R' 2 2. '-{ !?D
\22.3 TW4-25 7g _ 3D Flow IB' ~ &P.M.
Meter 326~63~ '10
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number):
System Operational (If no note
anv oroblems/correctlve actions)
Cfe~)NO
Cfe~ No
C!_eP No
;Yes) No
\. /
~No
{YeS .No
(Y_eS) No
(YeS) No
('YeS) No
~es) No
C[e) No
' (YeS) No
(Y'"es"')No
)res) No
'-----""""
({@No
(188) No
(ieS) No
c:Yei) No
-------------------------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Date 8/ jq) z:oi3
Weekly Inspection Form
Name -r:T1,~· ~oi),'Jctj
Time Well Depth* Comments
r~SS MW-4 65,01 Flow 3.~
Meter 17/..S f,j. ~<..
l3SO MW-26 ~ Flow !03
70.13 Meter 3Sl5ZS -&'Z.
)4t$ TW4-19 &-7. 13 Flow 1'-L 0
Meter l I..\ I:, C)~ 4~ /~ ~
l3"'iS TW4-20 ~ bZ .Lf; Flow io.3
Meter ~z:s3LJS ,us
I3S&"' TW4-4 G'i.Gj3 Flow 8.0
Meter l L.6CJ ~3 .·t.f
; '-\ oq TWN-2 33,2.\ Flow 185
Meter 1D 5q53. 8
3:>1'2... TW4-22 b.S.l .b Flow U(L{
Meter 573-n.1 ,
/33q TW4-24 0Y .b3 Flow il\'.0
Meter '-H7)z.LJ :1
!'iDS TW4-25 60.53 Flow 18,3
Meter ·-s':) o -zo, z.
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
System Operational (If no note
anv Droblemsfcorrective actions)
~No
CYes) No
('TeS) No
~Yes) No -
(Yes "No
((Yes ""'No
(Ye._s) No
Cve§ No
Cvei)No
c--ves,>Jo
~esl No
( Ye·s 2No
eves No
CyeS) No
(v~ No
C Yes\ No
Cves)No
(ve§)__ No
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ----------------'
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Monthly Depth Check Form
Date sl:z:3{1 3 Name 6.x,..,...·_._ p,._t ....... e.r-
Time Well Depth* Time Well Depth*
O.\l9 MW-4 1 .Ca ·l-D oq3~ TWN-1 5(2.33
IQ t cl TW4-1 (o L(.'~5 0 ]SL\ TWN-2 ~ 33.13
loY ~ TW4-2 Co&-5S 093\ TWN-3 ~],t;-=t
iQ \·-a. TW4-3 5 \. \g 6 ,~Jcld 5 U' TWN-4 q L2>.So
\l') ~ 0 TW4-4 t--\ . 3 Z) IP-53~WN-7 87 .0<-1
1no<1 TW4-5 sq.so n 9d..+ TWN-18 ~g. (Q :i
<Od-. I TW4-6 ~S -~o I 2,5'C> MW-27 C:2. ~0
ioll-TW4-7 Co(:). ao i:300 •
MW-30 '15~'32..
IC I~ TW4-8 uS .as \30 ;2. MW-31 6 7 . :>j
!rb I ( TW4-9 Sl.~d-•::._,·~1 TW4-28 ').[_p • "':.\ Ll ...,
1001-TW4-10 S~~~S ~a ?.n TW4-29 '1-d...DO
on TW4-11 ~1-. s s \D ;;l_C{ TW4-30 l-~--=to
fo3°l TW4-12 L\d_ • 01 ~~ 'b l TW4-31 .:2 ~ J. -=t u . ' '
io3? TW4-13 L) i-' ~ {
t D '2, '2, TW4-14 R ;. 3Co
I Db -~ TW4-15 ~ "'1. ~ ~Q -' I 0
!3D5 TW4-16 6'D-<1o
. j3:i'J&' TW4-17 /3. ~0
Q<-t3{.IJ TW4-18 (aQ . J-. \
II oo TW4-19 i.P~6o
no3 TW4-20 CSJ )_. :)5
oq·j9, TW4-21 wo.ao =
\(1~~ TW4-22 5l .o ~
I(, 13 TW4-23 -0 0 (pL/, ~.
!C~D TW4-24 CoS,J.6
o qLl( TW4-25 (o ?,~~d._
o)d-TW4-26 GJ.'l-0
re~tD TW4-27 f3 \. ·~o
Comments: (Please note the well number for any comments)
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet
Weekly Inspection Form
Date g ( ;u ( 1 1
Time We'll Depth* Comments
13'-14 MW-4 6ll. :lo Flow 3_1 &f>_,t.A.
Meter 17.tCl3lf _oOf
/340 MW-26 /3.31 Flow 10,~ 6P~
Meter 3534.2.5. ?'"\
Jl..{t{O TW4-19 6 L-l.f66 Flow -l LlJ:J 0 (>~
Meter I 4~q2 1 5.oo
J538 TW4-20 62 3<...i Flow J().o &PM
Meter 58' 4'6~3 ::zs-
·13yg TW4-4 71.Y6 Flow g I {rf.;V\_
Meter 1/;567 2~ LO
!3:10 TWN-2 '5.2.£0 Flow IS~6 &PA
Meter \12~3.0 3u
L3-33 TW4-22 _5,"7 ~ :3 _i-l Flow I£.,~ b(?A
Meter .5~7 2.'L 40
i'3.U TW4-24 7 t; .,., Flow ll. ~ 6t';CA
Meter 5C)Ui'-f j)O
iGoo TW4-25 tfCJ' 1.6 Flow i~Lo &P~
Meter 3t.t 1 s zl.\ !?o
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number):
System Operational (If no note
anv problems/corrective actions)
Cv~ No
(Ye~ No
{rej No
(re§_ No -
(Ve(S) No
{Yes)No
O'eS'-) No
(Yesj No
--:-
(Yes} No
~S) No
~No
Ife~ No
;fes)No
/{eS) No ..___..
(YesJNo
(Ves) No
t[j$,' No
/feS) No
---------------------------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
Time Well Depth* Comments
1332 MW-4 tlf.71 Flow 3,> 6-P_.A-/\.
Meter c,.i":> 3=v :3; ;6j;l:;DI;:
1->72..'3 3 ~ .6c:>
/325 MW-26 63.30 Flow I 0 • t..(_ &. P .-AA
Meter 35"5.21.1. c;_/6
Jt LJo TW4-19 _5"t.(_22_ Flow I L-LD /,-?M
Meter l.t>"D61.L-\6-Dt"
1312 TW4-20 6L3o Flow t1 6 (,..p~
Meter .s·s6:2DY.. 7£.'
I ::?31 TW4-4 6'8~0 L-1 Flow X' . 0 /-, p _,.v\
Meter 17o'3q3~ lo
rz. '-i5 TWN-2 36:?-o Flow 18,7 6..-PAA
Meter ll~72S.O
1 3 C" "S TW4-22 _!; 7.50 Flow 1 S.E-
Meter &o6C;:2.. DO
!2SZ. TW4-24 6 < .. 7.0 Flow i fL ~.o( t.P~
Meter 51.1-\637.ba
\1 ~t; TW4-25 ,~.; -s·. qo Flow I'R'.n I? PfoA.
Meter 353!\l<i.f... ri
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
System Operational (If no note
anv problems/corrective actions)
{Ye§) No
(YeS) No -
~~ No
---ere§ No
eves No
(fe~ No __...
.0~No
(Ve&) No
{Ye~ No "'
eYe~ No
e--Yes) No
~s No
~No
~No
/YeP No
(Ye§)No
(Yes) No
('{e$) No
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ---------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest O.Oi feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
Date 9 I q l 1.3
Time Well Depth* Comments
J2_23 MW-4 6·7qg Flow 3.l-\ &PA
Meter 1<6'6~1.17~ CJI
123 ( MW-26 66.72 Flow 10" l b p _,.tA,._
Meter 356q~z..K6
!3D&' TW4-19 6 _5;-. £}.{. Flow 1 L.\.D L,j>_,.v\.
Meter 1.5'33100~00
J 2-'?J, TW4-20 61. g5 Flow q s ;q.p_/J\_
Meter 5&7_t:;&s747
.1226 TW4-4 t,'C,.lb Flow 8.6 6-P~
Meter t14Z2g>.t..IO
12on TWN-2 2lf . ..<o Flow IB.S &f'A
Meter I llt01..12. 3o
1242. TW4-22 S7.50 Flow l&'.,i &P"""-
Meter b :2.3fs' 1. 1.1o
\2Y1 TW4-24 65_£,0 Flow l 3. O Gf?~
Meter 5'12Z.Oo,. LO
1152 TW4-25 57. 8'5 Flow i&.n f..P~
Meter 3626.9Cf ~0
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
System Operational (If no note
anv problems/corrective actions)
~ No
@§.)No
!"~No
?Ye?) No -
(YeS) No
(YeS) No
('Ye_§) No
(YeS) No
{(65) No
((8Sj No
(Y@ No
(Ye$]-No
--=
~No
f(eS) No
('Yes) No
eYeS) No
-rYe~ No
(Yff$ No
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ---------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 teet.
Weekly Inspection Form
Date 4 t n 1 1 3
Time Well Depth* Comments
11.:>27 MW-4 70.52 Flow 3.Y 6PA
Meter Jq3i1JL 1'-l
l 02. z_ MW-26 62. 4g-Flow \ODS GPA
Meter 35£10Cfb ~I\
J.l)OO TW4-19 .. 5'L 6'-l Flow IY .. D (;,(2~
Meter 15Y$673 .. cc>
J €>/ s TW4-20 ;.,· /. i I Flow q.6 6P.A
Meter 5gg1q2 ~D
iD.:31 TW4-4 6£1_ ZD Flow ~.0 &P .f-'\.
Meter i/4735".30
J 2.. Y&' TWN-2 3Z.IZ Flow i 8'~5 &P.P'..
Meter JZ-4170.,60
iOt'"t TW4-22 51.70 Flow 1~. z.. 6-P~
Meter GY42.'1 .• ID
JOiO TW4-24 6'B. q~ Flow !fro &PA
Meter 56463i DO
12.43 TW4-25 /0,62. Flow I s?.3 t.-PA
Meter 37~/bg",qo
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
System Operational (If no note
anv problems/corrective actions) .
(f__es]No
{Ye"0 No -
(Yes) No
{fes) No
(Ye~ No
l{es) No
(ve§J No
({eS) No
01e?J No
{f_esj No -
-
eYe~ No
(JeS) No
(YeS) No
@ No
(fe§) No
(18§) No
&e~) No
~ No
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): B.rr.-r:dc.e..;-wc..,.s. re.-$ef a.. ........ A ,o,e...l\ .r
f~~r: t':5 .~ar-~ 1\y.
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
'
Date
Time Well
1'2.:3'1 MW-4
I "2.36 MW-26
J3cl TW4-19
I 'Z.3Z. TW4-20
'12~4 TW4-4
I '2.1 g TWN-2
I z 2-•l TW4-22
I Z. 2.') TW4-24
JZ t3 TW4-25
Weekly Inspection Form
Depth*
67~45'
bb 70
/0. ~1..
,(L30
6ct .0 L-{
2-~.so
57 79
bh.D'-t
lo/. 46
Name c~<i:,v: __ p 0 (,..,..._e.-•
Comments
Flow 3.3 6-f~
Meter lcit;q 53. g 3
Flow I o . 2-&P .fi.A-
Meter 36o&l.i 3o
Flow l t.t.o &fA
Meter 15661~7.00
Flow lo.'--\ &P _,<A
Meter 5.5.0 (l.jq ~ 2.6
Flow [).o &I?.~'""
Meter \&'30-zLSo
Flow if>,7 &f.)-A-
Meter I 2. bqg,s 140
Flow I <if. ~-1 tA.JA-
Meter .65€''1 Cf 7 0
Flow ULo &PM.
Meter J;~OO I 'l. ~o
Flow i 8' 0 GP.fA
Meter 3.8"2.2.55. 00
System Operational (It no note
anv problems/corrective actions)
{Ye§} No
(Ye§) No
~
~eSJ No
{Yes)No
,....
(res) No
(<{es) No -=--(YeQNo
(Yei}No
(Yes) No
(Ye_$) No
({e§> No
(Yes_) No -· /Yes')No
!YeS)_ No
(Ye$3 No
~e~ No
(YeS) No
(j~No
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ----------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
Name--r:{\Aer .~. J/1
1
·
Operational (If no note
Time Well Depth* Comments anv Problems/corrective actions) -
['3 ~~ -MW-4 6<) O/ Flow -s.L.\ (-Y..~s)No
Meter z.o2S~'2.. 15 C_ Yes) No -
13 ;0 MW-26 15 ~ cl Flow 10,1 \.:Y~~No
Meter 3{:,Z3 Z.<i.Z.t.{ C Yes)No
-=--,,.
1"!00 TW4-19 72-.SS Flow 1'1.0 ( Y._es)No ~
Meter IS703Z.4.oS c Yes) No
-·-"='
130{, TW4-20
(,6 '' s Flow tO.'-/ ~~~0
Meter st:t 16 -z.i. 3b "-_ Yes-}No
..£ :-::--....
l-:)11 TW4-4 76 03 Flow f<.O C -.YP~...~'No
Meter \~7g3S,£o c___ves~No
_.,
\1..55 TWN-2 'Y-1.~~ Flow 1S.5 <:Yjs)No
Meter 130 b 25 .Z.O (~ No
~-;
)':~ 0 ';! TW4-22 !)cUI Flow \ ~-i 0L_~o
Meter t,l/'1~.50 C_ YeS) No
-~
\JO() TW4-24 G,Li.l ~ Flow )&_ 0 "Ye~o
Meter 600055.40 ( Ye~No
n.so TW4-25 b6.'Z..'::> Flow 'It). 0 ('r~ No
Meter 3'1 'Z..SL. \ :z. -z. (Ve~ No '-_.....-
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ----------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
TabD
Kriged Previous Quarter Groundwater Contour Map
® estimated dry area
MW~S perched monitoring well showing
•5503 elevation in feet amsl
TW0
4•12 temporary perched monitoring well
· 5582 showing elevation in feet amsl
TWN~10 hed . . . A ~ temporary perc nitrate momtonng
v 5-86 well showing elevation in feet amsl
PIEZ-1 perched piezometer showing
Q 5593 elevation in feet amsl
TW4-28 temporary perched monitoring well
~ 5580 installed March, 2013 showing
elevation in feet amsl
RUIN SPRING b 5380 seep or spring showing
elevation in feet amsl
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
KRIGED 2nd QUARTER, 2013 WATER LEVELS
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE REFERENCE FIGURE
H:l718000/aug13/Uwl0613.srf D-1
TabE
Hydrographs of Groundwater Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
0> 0 0
4
01 9 0
~
~
,
t
~
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
.j:>.
0 0
w 0 0
1\)
0 0
_.
0
0
0
0
06/01/08
12/18/08
07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/11
04/01/12
10/18/12
05/06/13
11/22/13
06/10/14
-4 ::e z
I ......
~ -CD ...,
r-CD < CD
0 < CD ...,
::t
3
CD -= .
C"
3 "'0 -
w 01
0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
w 0 0
1\)
01
0
~ ,/'
1\)
0
0
......
01
0
~~
~ t v
I
t
/ ~
......
0 0
01
0 0 0
06/01/08
12/18/08
07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/11
04/01/12
10/18/12
05/06/13
11/22/13
06/10/14
~ z I
1\)
~ -CD ..,
r-CD < ~
0 < CD ..,
::!
3 CD ---.
C'
3
"C -
.p..
0 0
w 01 0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
w 0 0
1\:) c..n 0
1\:)
9 0
......
01
0
......
0 0
01
0 0 0
06/01/08
12/18/08
07/06/09
01/22/10
-1 :e z
I w
08/10/10 ~ .... (1)
""' r-
02/26/11 (1) < !.
0 ~ ""' 09/14/11 ::!
3 (1) --....
04/01/12 .
C"
3
"C -
10/18/12
05/06/13
11/22/13
06/10/14
0> !=>
0
01 0 0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
--
.j:>. 0 0
~
~
~
~
w !=> 0
1\)
0 0 0 0
'
0 0
06/01/08
12/18/08
07/06/09
01/22/10
-4 ::e z I ~
08/10/10 ~ -CD '"'II
r-CD 02/26/11 < CD
0 < CD '"'II 09/14/11 ::t
3
CD ---. 04/01/12 C" -3
"C -
10/18/12
05/06/13
11/22/13
06/10/14
8~/90/90
G ~/8 ~/0 ~
v < ~
-c.
E G~/~0/170
.c
...; --(I)
E
i= ~ ~lv ~160
I.. (I) > 0
(I) > (I) ~ ~/9G/GO ..J
I..
(I) -~
Lt)
I 0~/0~/80 z
3: ....
60/90/LO
80/8~/G~
•
1\ ~
\ ~
~·
'i---
:>
1----~ ~
I
1\.
'
00 c:i I'-
v~I0~/90
-
t
8~/90/90
-<:: ~/B ~/0 ~ a.
E
J:l
.,;
v ~ -v v -~ L.---~ --i::~/~0/'170 Cl)
E
i= ....
Cl) > 0 ~ ~~v~/60
Cl) > Cl)
.J ....
Cl) ~ ~/91::/1::0 -C'CS 3:
CD I z
3: 0~/0~/BO 1-
-v <
"' ).
< I -
o~;~::~::no " "' "' ~ ~ p
60/90/LO
80/B~/G~
<D CX> 0
.....
<D CJ)
0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
<D ~ 0
<D !':l 0
<D 0 0
\
' •
~
)
\
~
CX> CX> 0
~\
~
CX> !J> 0
>
12/18/08
07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/11
04/01/12
10/18/12
05/06/13
11/22/13
06/10/14
~ z I ~
~ -<D ""' r-<D < <D
0 < <D ""' ::t
3 <D --:-+
C"
3
"'C -
CJ)
01
0
1
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
CJ)
0
0
01 ~
0
01 0
0
~ :-----"
.j>. 01 0
r-----
~
~·
•
~
~
~
t
~
-
.j>.
0 0
12/18/08
07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/11
04/01/12
10/18/12
05/06/13
11/22/13
~ z I Q)
~ -(1)
""'' r-(1) < (1)
0 < (1)
""'' ::t
3 (1) --:-+
C"
3
"0 -
CJ)
CJ)
0
CJ) ()1
0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
CJ) .j:>.
0
CJ) w 0
CJ)
1\)
0
CJ) .....
0
CJ)
0
0
()1
CD
0
1------+----+-----+----i-----1-----+-----+ 12/18/08
07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
-09/14/11
. 04/01/12
c 10/18/12
-05/06/13
._ __ __._ ___ ..__ __ ---L...----'-------'-----'-----'-11/22/13
-1 :e z I CD
~ -CD ""':
r-CD < !.
0 < CD ""':
::t
3 CD --:-+
C" -3
"'C -
CXl (;.)
0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
CXl I\)
C:n
CXl I\)
0
CXl CXl ...... ......
C:n 0
CXl 0
C:n
' 12/18/08
~ 07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/11
04/01/12
10/18/12
05/06/13
~.....-____ .____ ___ ___.Jl-__. ___ ___.Jt_ ___ ___.J ____ ___._11 /22/13
~ z I ......
0
~ -(1) ...
r-(1) < ~
0 < (1) ...
::!
3
(1) --:-+
C"
3
"C -
-c. E
.c
..; --Cl)
E
i= ... Cl) > 0
Cl) > Cl)
..J ... Cl) -~ ,.... ,....
I z ~
8 ~/C::C::H ~ -.-----,------.----.,...------r-----,--------,
8 ~/90/SO ·
C:: ~/B ~/0 ~
C::~/~0/170
~ ~~v~/60
~ ~/92:/C::O
0~/0~/BO
60/90/LO -l----+-----+-----+-----+-----1f---__J
0
o)
CD
LO
o)
CD
£ ~/90/90
G~/8~/0~
-a. E -.c
= UH0/170 -Cl)
E
i=
:1.. Cl) > 0 ~ ~~v~/60
Cl) > Cl)
.J
:1.. Cl) -~ ~ ~/9G/GO
N
T"" I z 3: ....
0~/0~/80
0~/GG/~0
60/90/LO
1
<4
~
q q
0 1.0
1\
~
~:
0
c)
"<!"
£~/GG/~ ~ ~----~----~-----.-----....------.
£~/90/SO
G~/8~/0~
-a.
E
.c
= UHO!vO -(I)
E
i=
:to-(I) > 0
G) ~ ~lv ~160 ·
> (I)
...J
:to-
(I) -~ ~ ~/9G/G0
('I)
T"" I z ~
0~/0~/80
0~/GG/~0
60/90/L0-+------1------+-----+-----+-----1
0) w
0>
0) w ~
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
0) w rv
0) ~ 0
0)
1\)
00
.....__ ---. "",
I ~
0)
1\)
0>
0)
1\)
~
0)
1\) rv
4~
\
t
~ ~ 1\
0)
1\)
0
0) ......
00
'----~
-----·
0) ......
0>
07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
-1 =e
02/26/11 z I ......
~
~ -CD
""'' 09/14/11 r-CD < CD
0 < CD
04/01/12 ""'' ::t
3 CD ---.
10/18/12 C" -3
"0 -
05/06/13
11/22/13
06/10/14
~
0
~
<D !'>
0
1
4
~
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
<D 0
0
- ---
00 !l>
0
00 0)
0
------
00 ~
0
.....
00 1\)
0
I
I
00 9
0
07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/11
04/01/12
10/18/12
05/06/13
11/22/13
-t ::e z I ......
CJ1
~ -<D ..,
r-<D < <D
0 < <D ..,
::t
3
<D -::::
C"
3
"'C -
~ co c.n
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
~ ~ 0
~ co c.n
~ co 0
~ "'-I c.n
~ "'-I
0
1-----~,...-----~--------l-----1-----r 07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/11
··04/01/12
'" 10/18/12
05/06/13
11/22/13
1.------.l------.l-----'-----'------'-06/10/14
~ z I ...... m
~ -(I)
'"'I
r-(I) < !!.
0 < (I)
'"'I
=!
3 (I) --:-+
5!:
3
"C -
-a.
E
.c
..:: --G)
E
i= ....
G) > 0
G) > G)
..J ....
G) -~
r--
T"" I z ~
£~teem~ ,.------.------.-----,....-----r------,-----,
£~/90/90 .
c~IB~to~
G ~/~0/170
~ ~/17 ~/60
~ ~19ctco ·
0 ~10 ~/BO
0~/ccHO
60/90/LO -1-----4-----l------1------+-----+------1
0
C'".i (")
I{)
Lri (")
0 <0 (")
-...J 0 0
0)
9 0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
01 0 0
~ 0 0
...____
/ /
'~
~ -----~ --------~,..-----
~
~
~
I
~
-
(;.)
0 0
1\)
0
0
......
0
0
0
0
07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/11
04/01/12
10/18/12
05/06/13
11/22/13
06/10/14
~ :e z
I ~ co :e I» -CD "" r-CD < CD
0 < CD "" ::t
3 CD --:-+
C"
3
"'0 -
01 01 0,
01 01 0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
01 -1>-0,
01 -1>-0
01 w 0,
01 w 0
01 1\:)
0,
01 1\:)
0
07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/11
04/01/12
10/18/12
05/06/13
11/22/13
06/10/14
~ z I ......
CD
~ -CD ""' r-CD < !.
0 < CD ""' ::!
3
CD -:::
C"
3
"'C -
-a. E
.a
= -Q)
E i=
J.. Q) > 0
Q) > Q)
..J
J..
Q) -~
0
('I)
I 3:
::!:
v ~/LGlC. ~ -.----,-----.,------.----....,----....,------,
8~/v~/80
c~/~0/vO "
0 ~/8 ~~~ ~
60/90/LO
80/GG/GO
90/0~/0~
90/8c/90 +-----+-----+-----1-----1-----1-----l
0 0 00
-c.
E -.c
= -C1)
E
i=
J.. C1) > 0
C1) > C1)
...J
J..
C1) -ca 3: ,....
C")
I 3: ::2:
8~/t~/80
G~/W/tO
0 ~/8 ~/ ~ ~
60/90/LO
80/GG/GO
90/0~/0~
90/8G/90
0
cD (!)
f ~
\
•
0
<X)
(!)
~
~
)
~
·~
~i---
1'.
0
C\i I'-
l.-----~
l.-----
0
cD I'-
q
<Xl I'-
(·u) ~u!Od 6u!Jnseaw MOias 1,ndaa
0
c:i <Xl
q
C\J <Xl
TabF
Depths to Groundwater and Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -1
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitorin~ (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,646.96 5,648.09 1.13 112.5
5,600.38 02/06/09 47.71 46.58
5,599.99 07/21/09 48.10 46.97
5,600.26 09/21/09 47.83 46.70
5,601.10 10/28/09 46.99 45.86
5,602.59 12/14/09 45.50 44.37
5,600.55 03/11/10 47.54 46.41
5,600.66 05/11/10 47.43 46.30
5,599.18 09/29/10 48.91 47.78
5,598.92 12/21/10 49.17 48.04
5,598.29 02/28/11 49.80 48.67
5,597.80 06/21/11 50.29 49.16
5,597.32 09/20/11 50.77 49.64
5,597.15 12/21/11 50.94 49.81
5,596.54 03/27/12 51.55 50.42
5,596.52 06/28112 51.57 50.44
5,595.03 09/27/12 53.06 51.93
5,596.62 12/28/12 51.47 50.34
5,593.54 03/28/13 54.55 53.42
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-2
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,625.75 5,626.69 0.94 95
5,611.37 02/06/09 15.32 14.38
5,610.63 07/21/09 16.06 15.12
5,609.73 09/21/09 16.96 16.02
5,607.08 ll/02/09 19.61 18.67
5,606.57 12/14/09 20.12 19.18
5,612.45 03/ll/1 0 14.24 13.30
5,612.78 05/11/10 13.91 12.97
5,611.37 09/29/10 15.32 14.38
5,610.24 12/21/10 16.45 15.51
5,610.64 02/28/11 16.05 15.11
5,609.78 06/21/11 16.91 15.97
5609.79 09/20111 16.90 15.96
5609.72 12/21/11 16.97 16.03
5,605.69 03/27/12 21.00 20.06
5,605.67 06/28/12 21 .02 20.08
5,603.03 09/27/12 23.66 22.72
5,605.76 12/28112 20.93 19.99
5,598.28 03/28/13 28.41 27.47
5,594.32 06/27/13 32.37 31.43
5,594.38 09/27113 32.31 31 .37
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -3
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,633.64 5,634.50 0.86 110
5,603.77 02/06/09 30.73 29.87
5,602.37 07/21/09 32.13 31 .27
5,602.34 09/21/09 32.16 31.30
5,602.60 10/28/09 31.90 31.04
5,603.12 12/14/09 31.38 30.52
5,602.90 03/11/10 31.60 30.74
5,603.23 05/11/10 31.27 30.41
5,602.86 09/29/10 31.64 30.78
5,603.35 12/21/10 31.15 30.29
5,602.89 02/28/11 31.61 30.75
5,602.75 06/21/11 31.75 30.89
5,602.40 09/20/11 32.10 31.24
5,602.40 12/21/11 32.10 31.24
5,601.70 03/27/12 32.80 31.94
5,601.67 06/28/12 32.83 31.97
5,600.50 09/27/12 34.00 33.14
5,601.74 12/28/12 32.76 31.90
5,598.60 03/28/13 35.90 35.04
5,597.18 06/27/13 37.32 36.46
5,597.36 09/27/13 37.14 36.28
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -4
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5.641.04 5,641.87 0.83 136
5,601.47 02/06/09 40.40 39.57
5,604.26 07/21/09 37.61 36.78
5,605.02 09/21/09 36.85 36.02
5,605.87 10/28/09 36.00 35.17
5,605.81 12/14/09 36.06 35.23
5,605.31 03111110 36.56 35.73
5,605.36 05111110 36.51 35.68
5,604.59 09/29/10 37.28 36.45
5,604.42 12/21110 37.45 36.62
5,603.69 02/28111 38.18 37.35
5,603.36 06/21/11 38.51 37.68
5,602.82 09/20/1 I 39.05 38.22
5,602.79 12/21111 39.08 38.25
5,600.82 03/27/12 41.05 40.22
5,600.84 06/28112 41.03 40.20
5,598.47 09/27/12 43.40 42.57
5,600.86 12/28112 41.01 40.18
5,595.57 03/28/13 46.30 45.47
5,594.12 06/27113 47.75 46.92
5,593.33 09/27/13 48.54 47 .71
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -5
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitorin2 (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,653.70 5,655.18 1.48 155
5,584.43 08/25/09 70.75 69.27
5,584.51 09/21/09 70.67 69.19
5,584.54 11110/09 70.64 69.16
5,584.62 12/14/09 70.56 69.08
5,584.97 03/11/10 70.21 68.73
5,585.38 05/ll/10 69.80 68.32
5,585.35 09/29/10 69.83 68.35
5,585.42 12/21/10 69.76 68.28
5,585.08 02/28/11 70.10 68.62
5,585.38 06/21111 69.80 68.32
5,585.51 09/20/11 69.67 68.19
5,585.76 12/21/11 69.42 67.94
5,585.61 03/27112 69.57 68.09
5,585.63 06/28/12 69.55 68.07
5,585.63 09/27/12 69.55 68.07
5,585.90 12/28/12 69.28 67.80
5,585.68 03/28/13 69.50 68.02
5,585.57 06/27/13 69.61 68.13
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -6
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,663.03 5.664.94 1.91 135
5,589.52 08/25/09 75.42 73.51
5,589.46 09/22/09 75.48 73.57
5,589.61 11/03/09 75.33 73.42
5,589.92 12114/09 75.02 73.11
5,590.24 03/ll/10 74.70 72.79
5,590.40 05111110 74.54 72.63
5,590.24 09/29/10 74.70 72.79
5,590.49 12/21110 74.45 72.54
5,590.16 02/28111 74.78 72.87
5,590.44 06/21/11 74.50 72.59
5,590.35 09/20/11 74.59 72.68
5,590.67 12/21/11 74.27 72.36
5,590.34 03/27/12 74.60 72.69
5,590.32 06/28112 74.62 72.71
5,589.77 09/27/12 75.17 73.26
5,589.67 12/28/12 75.27 73.36
5,589.45 03/28/13 75.49 73.58
5,589.01 06/27113 75.93 74.02
5,588.99 09/27/13 75.95 74.04
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -7
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,647.39 5,649.26 1.87 120
5,552.56 08/25/09 96.70 94.83
5,558.34 09/21109 90.92 89.05
5,558.82 11110/09 90.44 88.57
5,558.96 12114/09 90.30 88.43
5,559.54 03111110 89.72 87.85
5,559.60 05111110 89.66 87.79
5,559.83 09/29110 89.43 87.56
5,559.00 12/21/10 90.26 88.39
5,559.68 02/28/11 89.58 87.71
5,560.43 06/21111 88.83 86.96
5,560.46 09/20111 88 .80 86.93
5,560.78 12/21/11 88.48 86.61
5,560.92 03/27112 88.34 86.47
5,560.87 06/28/12 88.39 86.52
5,561.40 09/27/12 87.86 85.99
5,561.50 12/28112 87 .76 85.89
5,562.01 03/28/13 87.25 85.38
5,562.21 06/27/13 87.05 85.18
5,562.41 09/27/13 86.85 84.98
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-8
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,649.35 5,651.48 2.13 160
5,589.01 08/25/09 62.47 60.34
5,589.10 09/21109 62.38 60.25
5,589.09 11103/09 62.39 60.26
5,603.38 12/14/09 48.10 45.97
5,589.68 03/11/10 61.80 59.67
5,589.95 05111110 61.53 59.40
5,589.74 09/29/10 61.74 59.61
5,589.97 12/21110 61.51 59.38
5,589.67 02/28111 61.81 59.68
5,589.96 06/21111 61.52 59.39
5,589.82 09/20/11 61.66 59.53
5,590.18 12/21111 61.30 59.17
5,589.85 03/27112 61.63 59.50
5,589.84 06/28/12 61.64 59.51
5,589.28 09/27112 62.20 60.07
5,589.18 12/28/12 62.30 60.17
5,588.95 03/28113 62.53 60.40
5,588.47 06/27/13 63.01 60.88
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -9
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitorin~ (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,645.68 5,647.45 1.77 102.5
5,582.05 08/25/09 65.40 63.63
5,582.12 09/22/09 65.33 63.56
5,582.27 11110/09 65 .18 63.41
5,582.53 12/14/09 64.92 63.15
5,582.92 03/11/10 64.53 62.76
5,583.06 05111110 64.39 62.62
5,583.25 09/29/10 64.20 62.43
5,583.57 12/21/10 63.88 62.11
5,583.54 02/28111 63.91 62.14
5,583.92 06/21111 63.53 61.76
5,584.04 09/20/11 63.41 61.64
5,587.42 12/21/11 60.03 58.26
5,584.56 03/27/12 62.89 61.12
5,584.55 06/28/12 62.90 61.13
5,584.85 09/27112 62.6 60.83
5,585.24 12/28/12 62.21 60.44
5,585.35 03/28113 62.10 60.33
5,585.40 06/27113 62.05 60.28
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-10
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitorin~ (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,664.63 5,666.98 2.35 107.5
5,584.18 08/25/09 82.80 80.45
5,584.40 09122109 82.58 80.23
5,584.61 11110/09 82.37 80.02
5,584.90 12114/09 82.08 79.73
5,585.21 03111110 81.77 79.42
5,585.42 05111110 81.56 79.21
5,585.42 09/29110 81.56 79.21
5,585.68 12/21110 81.30 78.95
5,585.60 02/28111 81.38 79.03
5,585.95 06/21111 81.03 78.68
5,585.92 09/20/11 81.06 78.71
5,586.22 12/21/11 80.76 78.41
5,586.16 03127112 80.82 78.47
5,586.16 06128/12 80.82 78.47
5,586.13 09/27112 80.85 78.50
5,586.28 12/28/12 80.70 78.35
5,586.28 03/28/13 80.70 78.35
5,586.11 06/27/13 80.87 78.52
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -11
Total or
Measuring Measnred Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitorin~ (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,683.16 5,684.53 1.37 147.5
5,613.00 11103/09 71.53 70.16
5,613.88 12/14/09 70.65 69.28
5,614.65 03/11/10 69.88 68.51
5,615.16 05111110 69.37 68.00
5,614.93 09129110 69.60 68.23
5,615.09 12/21110 69.44 68.07
5,614.96 02/28/11 69.57 68.20
5,615.12 06/21/11 69.41 68.04
5,614.96 09/20111 69.57 68.20
5,615.18 12/21/11 69.35 67.98
5,615.11 03/27112 69.42 68.05
5,615.12 06/28112 69.41 68.04
5,615.03 09/27/12 69.50 68.13
5,615.28 12/28/12 69 .25 67.88
5,615.40 03/28/13 69.13 67.76
5,615.20 06/27113 69.33 67.96
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -12
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,667.03 5,668.24 1.21 115
5,628.33 11103/09 39.91 38.70
5,628.86 12/14/09 39.38 38.17
5,630.27 03/11/10 37.97 36.76
5,631.64 05111110 36.60 35.39
5,633.73 09/29110 34.51 33.30
5,633.43 12/21110 34.81 33.60
5,634.35 02/28111 33.89 32.68
5,635.95 06/21111 32.29 31.08
5,636.44 09/20/11 31.80 30.59
5,638.93 12/21111 29.31 28.10
5,639.69 03/27112 28.55 27.34
5,639.74 06/28/12 28.50 27.29
5,640.90 09/27/12 27.34 26.13
5,640.52 12/28112 27.72 26.51
5,639.99 03/28/13 28.25 27.04
5,639.54 06/27113 28.70 27.49
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -13
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitorin~ (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,633.04 5,634.32 1.28 120
5,586.95 11/03/09 47.37 46.09
5,587.22 12/14/09 47.10 45.82
5,587.45 03/11/10 46.87 45.59
5,587.64 05111110 46.68 45.40
5,587.37 09/29110 46.95 45.67
5,587.77 12/21110 46.55 45.27
5,587.64 02/28/11 46.68 45.40
5,587.89 06/21111 46.43 45.15
5,588.03 09/20111 46.29 45.01
5,588.30 12/21/11 46.02 44.74
5,588.32 03/27112 46.00 44.72
5,588.30 06/28/12 46.02 44.74
5,588.51 09/27/12 45 .8 1 44.53
5,588.71 12/28/12 45.61 44.33
5,588.87 03/28/13 45.45 44.17
5,588.79 06/27113 45.53 44.25
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-14
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,647.80 5,649.53 1.73 135
5,586.18 11/04/09 63.35 61.62
5,586.51 12114/09 63.02 61.29
5,586.71 03/11/10 62.82 61.09
5,586.72 05/11110 62.81 61.08
5,586.53 09/29/10 63.00 61.27
5,586.80 12/21110 62.73 61.00
5,586.74 02/28/11 62.79 61.06
5,586.84 06/21/11 62.69 60.96
5,586.73 09/20/11 62.80 61.07
5,586.98 12/21111 62.55 60.82
5,587.07 03/27/12 62.46 60.73
5,587.10 06/28/12 62.43 60.70
5,587.07 09/27/12 62.46 60.73
5,587.33 12/28/12 62.20 60.47
5,587.43 03/28/13 62.10 60.37
5,587.43 06/27/13 62.10 60.37
5,587.72 09/27/13 61.81 60.08
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-15
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,675.01 5,676.49 1.48 155
5,594.12 11110/09 82.37 80.89
5,584.03 12114/09 92.46 90.98
5,584.10 03/11/10 92.39 90.91
5,584.16 05111110 92.33 90.85
5,584.26 09129110 92.23 90.75
5,584.30 12/21110 92.19 90.71
5,584.04 02/28/11 92.45 90.97
5,584.30 06/21111 92.19 90.71
5,584.37 09/20111 92.12 90.64
5,584.49 12/21/11 92.00 90.52
5,584.47 03/27/12 92.02 90.54
5,584.49 06/28112 92.00 90.52
5,584.58 09/27/12 91.91 90.43
5,584.75 12/28112 91.74 90.26
5,584.93 03/28/13 91.56 90.08
5,584.83 06/27113 91.66 90.18
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-16
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,651.07 5,652.70 1.63 100
5,603.34 11104/09 49.36 47.73
5,603.56 12114/09 49.14 47.51
5,603.84 03/11110 48.86 47.23
5,604.31 05/11/10 48.39 46.76
5,604.28 09/29/10 48.42 46.79
5,604.39 12/21/10 48.31 46.68
5,604.20 02/28/11 48.50 46.87
5,604.55 06/21/11 48.15 46.52
5,604.74 09/20/11 47.96 46.33
5,604.94 12/21/11 47.76 46.13
5,604.84 03/27/12 47.86 46.23
5,604.85 06/28112 47.85 46.22
5,604.99 09/27/12 47.71 46.08
5,605.10 12/28/12 47.60 45.97
5,605.22 03/28113 47.48 45.85
5,605.11 06/27113 47.59 45.96
5,605.39 09/27113 47.31 45.68
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -17
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,639.73 5,641.55 1.82 100
5,605.96 11104/09 35.59 33.77
5,606.27 12/14/09 35.28 33.46
5,606.25 03/11110 35.30 33.48
5,606.55 05/11110 35.00 33.18
5,606.77 09/29/10 34.78 32.96
5,607.15 12/21110 34.40 32.58
5,606.96 02/28111 34.59 32.77
5,607.22 06/21111 34.33 32.51
5,607.40 09/20/11 34.15 32.33
5,607.85 12/21111 33.70 31.88
5,607.67 03/27/12 33.88 32.06
5,607.68 06/28/12 33.87 32.05
5,607.76 09/27/12 33.79 31.97
5,608.08 12/28/12 33.47 31.65
5,607.91 03/28113 33.64 31.82
5,607.64 06/27/13 33.91 32.09
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN -18
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,643.95 5,645.45 1.50 100
5,586.85 11102/09 58.60 57.10
5,600.14 12/14/09 45.31 43 .81
5,587.36 03111110 58.09 56.59
5,587.71 05111110 57.74 56.24
5,587.50 09/29110 57.95 56.45
5,607.66 12/21110 37.79 36.29
5,587.35 02128/11 58.10 56.60
5,587.71 06/21/11 57.74 56.24
5,587.65 09/20111 57.80 56.30
5,587.95 12/21111 57.50 56.00
5,587.05 03127/12 58.40 56.90
5,587.05 06/28112 58.40 56.90
5,587.50 09127112 57.95 56.45
5,587.50 12/28/12 57.95 56.45
5,587.32 03/28/13 58.13 56.63
5,586.95 06127/13 58.50 57.00
5,587.02 09/27/13 58.43 56.93
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-19
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,659.59 5,661.36 1.77 110
5,606.17 11/02/09 55.19 53.42
5,606.70 12114/09 54.66 52.89
5,607.22 03111/10 54.14 52.37
5,607.89 05/11/10 53.47 51.70
5,607.98 09/29/10 53.38 51.61
5,608.41 12/21110 52.95 51.18
5,608.49 02/28111 52.87 51.10
5,608.60 06/21/11 52.76 50.99
5,609.17 09/20/11 52.19 50.42
5,608.90 12/21111 52.46 50.69
5,608.87 03/27/12 52.49 50.72
5,608.86 06/28112 52.50 50.73
5,608.86 09/27112 52.50 50.73
5,608.86 12/28/12 52.50 50.73
5,609.17 03/28113 52.19 50.42
5,608.88 06/27/13 52.48 50.71
5,608.92 09/27113 52.44 50.67
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well MW -30
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,613.34 5,614.50 1.16 110
5,534.92 10/24/2006 79.58 78.42
5,535.09 3/16/2007 79.41 78.25
5,535.46 8/27/2007 79.04 77.88
5,535.06 10/15/2007 79.44 78.28
5,535.78 3/15/2008 78.72 77.56
5,536.26 6/15/2008 78.24 77.08
5,536.35 9/15/2008 78.15 76.99
5,536.68 11115/2008 77.82 76.66
5,535.42 3/15/2009 79.08 77.92
5,537.11 6/30/2009 77.39 76.23
5,536.93 9/10/2009 77.57 76.41
5,537.23 12/11/2009 77.27 76.11
5,537.59 3/1112010 76.91 75.75
5,537.85 511112010 76.65 75.49
5,538.37 9/29/2010 76.13 74.97
5537.70 12/2112010 76.8 75.64
5537.67 2/28/2011 76.83 75.67
5538.31 6/2112011 76.19 75.03
5538.15 9/20/2011 76.35 75.19
5538.42 12/2112011 76.08 74.92
5538.54 3/27/2012 75.96 74.8
5538.60 6/28/2012 75.9 74.74
5538.68 9/27/2012 75.82 74.66
5538.99 12/28/2012 75.51 74.35
5539.25 3/28/2013 75.25 74.09
5539.05 6/27/2013 75.45 74.29
5539.60 9/27/2013 74.90 73.74
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well MW -31
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitorin~ (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,615.26 5,616.40 1.14 130
5,544.07 10/24/2006 72.33 71.19
5,544.45 3/16/2007 71.95 70.81
5,536.94 8/27/2007 79.46 78.32
5,544.62 10/15/2007 71.78 70.64
5,545.37 3/15/2008 71.03 69.89
5,544.50 6115/2008 71.90 70.76
5,545.94 9/15/2008 70.46 69.32
5,546.42 11115/2008 69.98 68.84
5,546.03 3/15/2009 70.37 69.23
5,546.65 6/30/2009 69.75 68.61
5,546.45 9/10/2009 69.95 68.81
5,546.75 1211112009 69.65 68.51
5,547.09 3/11/2010 69.31 68.17
5,547.41 511112010 68.99 67.85
5,547.28 9/29/2010 69.12 67.98
5547.45 12/21/2010 68.95 67.81
5547.37 2/28/2011 69.03 67.89
5547.96 6/21/2011 68.44 67.3
5547.65 9/20/2011 68.75 67.61
5548.34 12/21/2011 68.06 66.92
5548.30 3/27/2012 68.10 66.96
5548.40 6/28/2012 68.00 66.86
5548.59 9/27/2012 67.81 66.67
5548.91 12/28/2012 67.49 66.35
5549.14 3/28/2013 67.26 66.12
5548.90 6/27/2013 67.50 66.36
5549.25 9/27/2013 67.15 66.01
TabG
Laboratory Analytical Reports
American West
ANALYTICAl lABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web : www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 3rd Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1308556-009
Client Sample ID: PIEZ-01_08282013
Collection Date: 8/28/2013 0730h
Received Date: 8/30/2013 0945h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
9/10/2013 1320h E300.0 10.0
9/6/2013 1817h E353.2 1.00
Analytical
Result Qual
55.1
7.83
Report Date: 9/13/2013 Page 12 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfom1cd in accordance to NELAC protocols, Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the .attached COC This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the -.ddrcssce, Prh ifegcs of
subsequent usc of the name uf this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the mlvcrtiscmcnt, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the rc~publication of this report for any
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 3rd Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1308556-010
Client Sample ID: PIEZ-02_08282013
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIEs Collection Date: 8/28/2013 0655h
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Received Date: 8/30/2013 0945h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
9/10/2013 1435h E300.0 5.00
9/6/2013 1818h E353.2 0.100
Analytical
Result Qual
9.66
0.198
Report Date: 9/13/2013 Page 13 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA nrc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee PriYilcgcs of
subscqllcnt usc of the name of this company or any member of its staft: or reproduction ofthis rep011 in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 3rd Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1308556-011
Client Sample ID: PIEZ-03 _ 08282013
ANALYTICAL LABoRAToRIEs Collection Date: 8/28/2013 0709h
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Received Date: 8/30/2013 0945h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
9/10/2013 1501h E300.0 5.00
9/6/2013 1819h E353.2 0.100
Analytical
Result Qual
22.4
1.81
Report Date: 9/13/2013 Page 14 of19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA r~rc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Peninent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee, Privileges of
subsequent usc of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this rcp011 in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: awal@awal-l abs.com
web : www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 3rd Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1308556-002
Client Sample ID: TWN-01_08272013
Collection Date: 8/27/2013 1019h
Received Date: 8/30/2013 0945h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
9/4/2013 2115h E300.0 5.00
9/6/2013 1803h E353.2 0.100
Analytical
Result Qual
24.1
1.24
Report Date: 9/13/2013 Page 5 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, ami RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infomtation is located on the attached COC This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Prh'ileges of
subsequent usc of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this rcpm1 for any
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 3rd Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1308556-001
Client Sample ID: TWN-01R_08272013
ANAlYTICAl lABoAAroAIEs Collection Date: 8/27/2013 0920h
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Received Date: 8/30/2013 0945h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
9/4/2013 2005h E300.0 1.00
9/6/2013 1801h E353.2 0.100
Analytical
Result Qual
< 1.00
<0.100
Report Date: 9/13/2013 Page 4 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols rcrtincnt sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of
suhscqucnt use of the name of this company or any member of its staft: or reproduction of this report in conllCction with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web : www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 3rd Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1308556-007
Client Sample ID: TWN-02_08272013
Collection Date: 8/27/2013 1440h
Received Date: 8/30/2013 0945h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
9/4/2013 2312h £300.0 10.0
9/6/2013 1810h £353.2 10.0
Analytical
Result Qual
75.9
80.0
Report Date: 9/13/20 13 Page 1 0 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA arc rcrfomled in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attnched COC This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent liSC or the name of this company or any member of its stan: or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the TC·publication of this report for any
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 3rd Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1308556-006
Client Sample ID: TWN-03_08282013
Collection Date: 8/28/2013 0643h
Received Date: 8/30/2013 0945h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
9/4/2013 2248h E300.0 50.0
9/6/2013 1808h E353.2 10.0
Analytical
Result Qual
171
20.9
Report Date: 9/13/2013 Page 9 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC This report is provic.lcd for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of
subsequent LISe of the name of this company or any member of it<; stan: or reproduction oftl1is report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in wnnedion V.'ith the re-publicaLion of this report for any
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 3rd Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1308556-004
Client Sample ID: TWN-04_08272013
ANAL vr 1 cAL LAB oRAro R 1 • • Collection Date: 8/27/2013 1207h
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail : [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Received Date: 8/30/2013 0945h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
9/4/2013 2202h E300.0 5.00
9/6/2013 1806h E353.2 0.100
Analytical
Result Qual
27.2
1.58
Report Date: 9/13/2013 Page 7 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonned in accordance to NELAC protocolsf Pcnincnt sampling information is located on the attached CDC. This report is provided for the exdusi\1C use of the addressee Privileges of
subscqm:nl usc of the name of this company or any member of its stafl: or reproduction of this rcp011 in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report f01 any
American West
ANAlYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone:[phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail : [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 3rd Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1308556-003
Client Sample ID: TWN-07 _ 08282013
Collection Date: 8/28/2013 0632h
Received Date: 8/30/2013 0945h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
9/4/2013 2139h E300.0 1.00
9/6/2013 \804h E353.2 0.100
Analytical
Result Qual
6.96
0.835
Report Date: 9/13/2013 Page 6 of 19
All am1lyscs applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infommtion is located on the attached COC This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee Privileges of
subsequent usc oft he name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or proccss, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
American West
ANALYTI C Al LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: (80 l) 263-8687
~-mail : [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 3rd Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1308556-005
Client Sample ID: TWN-18_08272013
Collection Date: 8/27/2013 1250h
Received Date: 8/30/2013 0945h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
Chloride mg/L 9/4/2013 2225h E300.0 10.0 70.4
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L 9/6/2013 1807h E353.2 1.00 2.04
1-Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix inte1jerence. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
Report Date: 9/13/2013 Page 8 of 19
All analyses applic.:ablc to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfon11cd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infommtion is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc oft he addressee Privileges of
subsequent usc of lhc name of this company or any member of its slnff, or reproduction of this report in connection "ith the itdvcrtiscm~:nt, promotion or sale of any prodw.:t or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 3rd Quarter Chloroform 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1309103-007
Client Sample ID: TW4-22_09032013
Collection Date: 9/3/2013 1305h
Received Date: 9/6/2013 1145h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
9/12/2013 1651h E300.0 100
9/12/2013 1933h E353.2 10.0
Analytical
Result Qual
487
29.7
Report Date: 9/18/2013 Page 13 of 55
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pcrtincnl sampling infonnation is located on the attal:hcd COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of
subsequent usc of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this repmt in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report fo1 any
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 3rd Quarter Chloroform 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1309103-002
Client Sample ID: TW4-24_09032013
Collection Date: 9/3/2013 1255h
Received Date: 9/6/2013 1145h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
9/12/2013 1329h E300.0 100
9/12/2013 l855h E353.2 10.0
Analytical
Result Qual
998
32.6
Report Date: 9/18/2013 Page 8 of 55
All analy1'ics upplicublc to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA nrc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocolsr Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee, Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its statl: or reproduction of Lhis rcp011 in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this rcrort fm any
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 3rd Quarter Chloroform 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1309103-001
Client Sample ID: TW4-25_09032013
Collection Date: 9/3/2013 1240h
Received Date: 9/6/2013 1145h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
9112/2013 1213h E300.0 50.0
9/12/2013 1853h E353.2 1.00
Analytical
Result Qual
119
5.69
Report Date: 9/18/2013 Page 7 of 55
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, ami RCRA ar~ pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is lm:atcd on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc oflhc addressee Privileges of
subsequent usc of the name of this company or any member of its stan: or reproduction of this rcp011 in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
:lalt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
:-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 3rd Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1308556-012
Client Sample ID: TWN-60_08272013
Collection Date: 8/27/2013 1515h
Received Date: 8/30/2013 0945h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
9/5/2013 1134h E300.0 1.00
9/6/2013 182lh E353.2 0.100
Analytical
Result Qual
< 1.00
< 0.100
Report Date: 9/13/2013 Page 15 of 19
All anulyscs applicable to the C\V A, SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfmmed in accordance to NELAC protocols PcrtincnL sampling information is located on the attached COC This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staft~ 01 reproduction of this rep011 in connection with the <Jdvcrtiscmcnt promotion or sale of any product or process, 01 in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
American West
ANA LYTIC AL lAB O RATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: (80 l) 263-8687
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 3rd Quarter Chloroform 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1309255-008
Client Sample ID: TW4-60_ 09122013
Collection Date: 9/12/2013 0845h
Received Date: 9/13/2013 1015h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
9/18/2013 2218h E300.0 1.00
9/17/2013 2108h E353.2 0.100
Analytical
Result Qual
< 1.00
<0.100
Report Date: 9/24/2013 Page 12 of 29
All an<:~lyscs applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA urc pcrfonned in accordam:e to NELAC protocols Pcnincnt sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC This report is provided for the cxc]u...,ivc use oft he addressee Privileges of
subsequent usc of the name or this company or any member of its stafl: or reproduction of this rcpmt in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in co11nection with the re-publi~.:ation of this report for any
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
!-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 3rd Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1308556-008
Client Sample ID: TWN-65_08272013
Collection Date: 8/27/2013 1207h
Received Date: 8/30/2013 0945h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
9/4/2013 2335h E300.0 5.00
9/6/2013 1825h E353.2 0.100
Analytical
Result Qual
29.0
1.57
Report Date: 9/13/2013 Page 11 of 19
All an<~ lyses applicabl!! to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are pcrfom1cd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc oft he addressee. Privileges of
subscqucnl usc oft he name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the utJvcrtiscmcnt, promotion or sale of any prodncl or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
ANALYTICAl lABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Garrin Palmer
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
TEL: ( 435) 678-2221
RE: 3rd Quarter Nitrate 2013
Dear Garrin Palmer: Lab Set ID: 1308556
American West Analytical Laboratories received 12 sample(s) on 8/30/2013 for the
analyses presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AWAL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) in Utah and Texas; and is
state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, and Missouri.
All analyses were performed in accordance to the NELAP protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation scope documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
Thank You, Ky I e F . Digilally signed by Kyle F. Gross
DN: cn=Kyle F. Gross, o=AWAL,
ou=AWAL-laboratory Director,
G email=kyle@awal-'abs com, c=US r 0 s s Dale: 2013 09.1812:00:43 -06"00"
Approvedby: ~----------------------~
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 9/13/2013 Page 1 of19
All ann lyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA an: perronned in accordam.:~.: to NELAC protocols Pertine-nt sampling infum1ation is located on the attache-d COC This report is provided for the cxdmdvc usc of the addressee Privileges of
subsequent usc oft he name of this company or any member of its statT. or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale ofnny product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report f01 any
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer • ANAlYTICAl lABORATORIES Project: 3rd Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Set ID: 1308556
Date Received: 8/30/2013 0945h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
463 West 3600 South
1308556-001A TWN-01R 08272013 8/27/2013 0920h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
)alt Lake City, UT 84115 1308556-0018 TWN-01R 08272013 8/27/2013 0920h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1308556-002A TWN-01 08272013 8/27/2013 1019h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1308556-0028 TWN-01 08272013 8/27/2013 1019h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Phone:[phone] 1308556-003A TWN-07_08282013 8/28/2013 0632h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Toll Free: [phone] 1308556-0038 TWN-07 08282013 8/28/2013 0632h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Fax: [phone] 1308556-004A TWN-04_08272013 8/27/2013 1207h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1308556-0048 TWN-04 08272013 8/27/2013 1207h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2 ~-mail: [e-mail] 1308556-005A TWN-18_08272013 8/27/2013 1250h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1308556-0058 TWN-18 08272013 8/27/2013 1250h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2 web : www.awal-labs.com 1308556-006A TWN-03 08282013 8/28/2013 0643h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1308556-0068 TWN-03 08282013 8/28/2013 0643h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1308556-007 A TWN-02_08272013 8/27/2013 1440h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Kyle F. Gross 1308556-0078 TWN-02 08272013 8/27/2013 1440h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Laboratory Director 1308556-008A TWN-65_08272013 8/27/2013 1207h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1308556-0088 TWN-65 08272013 8/27/2013 1207h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Jose Rocha 1308556-009A PIEZ-01_08282013 8/28/2013 0730h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
QA Officer 1308556-0098 PIEZ-01~08282013 8/28/2013 0730h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1308556-010A PIEZ-02 08282013 8/28/2013 0655h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1308556-0108 PIEZ-02 08282013 8/28/2013 0655h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1308556-011A PIEZ-03 08282013 8/28/2013 0709h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1308556-011B PIEZ-03 08282013 8/28/2013 0709h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1308556-012A TWN-60 08272013 8/27/2013 1515h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1308556-0128 TWN-60 08272013 8/27/2013 1515h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Report Date: 9/13/2013 Page 2 of 19
Al1 analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA :Jrc pcrfOnncd in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Pri\'ilcgcs of
subsequent use of the name of this t.:ompany or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advcrtis.:ml..!nC promotion or sale of any product or process, or in t.::onncction wirh the rc·publication of this report for any
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Inorganic Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
3rd Quarter Nitrate 2013
1308556
8/30/2013
8/27 & 8/28/2013
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation for the
samples were performed within the method holding times. The samples were properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD:
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, with the
following exceptions: The MS and MSD percent recoveries on nitrate/nitrite were
outside of control limits for sample 1308556-005B due to matrix interference.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 9/13/2013 Page 3 of 19
All ann lyses appli~:ab\c to I he CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols, Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the att:u.:hcd COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use oflhc addressee, Pri' ilegcs of
subsequent usc of the name of this company or any member of its staff, Ol' reproduction of this 1 ep011 in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process, OJ in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1308556
Project: 3rd Quarter Nitrate 2013
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R58729 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W ---
Chloride 4.82
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R58828 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.84
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R58961 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W ---
Chloride 4.90
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R58824 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.01
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: (80 I) 263-8686, Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
Units Method
09/0412013 1243h
mg/L E300.0
09/05/20 13 Ill Oh
mg/L E300.0
09/10/2013 1254h
mg/L E300.0
09/06/2013 1800h
mg/L E353.2
MDL
0.0114
0.0114
0.0114
0.00252
Reporting
Limit
1.00
0.100
0.100
0.100
QC Type: LCS
Amount
Spiked
5.000
5.000
5.000
1.000
Spike Ref.
Amount
0
0
0
0
%REC
96.4
96.8
97.9
101
Limits
90 -110
90-110
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 9/13/20 13 Page 16 of 19
, analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd Ln accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC This report is provided for the ~:xclusivc usc of the addrcsscc1 Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mbcr of its staff. or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company ilcccpts no responsibility
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: (80 I) 263-8686, Toll Free: [phone], Fax: (80 I) 263-8687
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Lab Set ID: 1308556
Project: 3rd Quarter Nitrate 2013
Analyte Result Units Method
Lab Sample ID: MB-R58729 Date Analyzed: 09/04/2013 1220h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride < 1.00 mg!L E300.0
Lab Sample ID: MB-R58828 Date Analyzed: 09/05/20 13 I 04 7h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride <0.100 mg/L E300.0
Lab Sample JD: MB-R58961 Date Analyzed: 09/10/2013 1229h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride <0.100 mg/L E300.0
Lab Sample ID: MB-R58824 Date Analyzed: 09/06/2013 1759h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) <0.100 mg/L E353.2
MDL
0.0114
0.0114
0.0114
0.00252
Reporting
Limit
1.00
0.100
0.100
0.100
Dept: we
QC Type: MBLK
Amount
Spiked
Spike Ref.
Amount ~oREC Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 9/13/20 13 Page I 7 of 19
analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the cxcluslvc usc of the add1csscc, Privileges of subsequent usc ofthc name of this company or any
mbcr of its sta.ff. or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will b.: granted only on contact This company accepts no responsibility
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1308556
Project: 3rd Quarter Nitrate 2013
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: 1308556-00IAMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 5.00
Lab Sample ID: 1308556-0UAMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.83
Lab Sample ID: 130855~09AMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 555
Lab Sample ID: 1308556-005BMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 15.3
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Units Method MDL
09/04/2013 2029h
mg/L E300.0 0.0114
09/05/20 13 11 57h
mg/L E300.0 0.0114
09/l 0/20 l3 1345h
mg/L £300.0 1.14
09/06/2013 1822h
mg/L E353.2 0.0252
Reporting
Limit
1.00
0.100
10.0
1.00
Contact:
Dept:
QCType:
Amount
Spiked
5.000
5.000
500.0
10.00
Garrin Palmer
we
MS
Spike Ref.
Amount o/eREC
0 100
0 96.7
55.1 99.9
2.04 133
' -Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix inteiference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
Limits
90-110
90-110
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 9/13/2013 Page 18 of 19
analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accortlancc to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. l11is report is provided for the exclusive usc oft he addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this c.:ompany or any
mbcr of its staff. or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of Lhis report for any purpose olhcr lhan for the addressee will be granted only on contact. TI1is company accepts no responsibility
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone] Laboratory Director
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES _QC SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Lab Set ID: 1308556 Dept: we
Project: 3rd Quarter Nitrate 2013 QC Type: MSD
Reporting Amount Spike Ref. RPDRef. RPD
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC Limits Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Lab Sample ID: 1308556-00IAMSD Date Analyzed: 09/04/2013 2052h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 5.02 mg/L £300.0 0.0114 1.00 5.000 0 100 90-110 5 0.479 20 -Lab Sample ID: 1308556-012AMSD Date Analyzed: 09/05/2013 1220h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.72 mg/L £300.0 0.0114 0.100 5.000 0 94.4 90-110 4.83 2.39 20
Lab Sample ID: 1308556-009 AMSD Date Analyzed: 09/1012013 1410h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 547 mg/L £300.0 1.14 10.0 500.0 55.1 98.3 90-110 555 1.43 20
Lab Sample ID: 1308556-005BMSD Date Analyzed: 09/06/2013 1823h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 14.3 mg/L £353.2 0.0252 1.00 10.00 2.04 122 90-110 15.3 7.27 10
1 -Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
Report Date: 9/13/20 13 Page 19 of 19
analyses applicable to the CW A. SDW A. and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of tht.: name of this company or any
mbcr of its staff. or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re-publication ofthis report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be gm.nted only on contact~ This company accepts no responsibility
American West Analytical Laboratories UL
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1308556 Page 1 of2
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 9111/2013
Client ID: DENlOO Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 3rd Quarter Nitrate 2013 QCLevel: III WO Type: Project
Comments: PA Rush. QC 3 (Sununary/No chromatograms). MUST report project specific DL's: Cl@ 1 mg/L, N02/N03 @ 0.1 mg/L. EDD-Denison & LOCUS. J
Email Group; .
Sample ill Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1308556-00IA TWN-01R_08272013 8/27/2013 0920h 8/30/2013 0945h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1308556-0018 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1308556-002A TWN-01_08272013 8/27/2013 1019h 8/30/2013 0945h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
1 SELAnalyres; CL
1308556-0028 N02/N03-W-353.2 !;;~] df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1308556-003A TWN-07_08282013 8/28/2013 0632h 8/30/2013 0945h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1308556-0038 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SELAnalytes: N03N02N
1308556-004A TWN-04_ 08272013 8/27/2013 1207h 8/30/2013 0945h 300.0-W Aqueous vi df-cl
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1308556-0048 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1308556-005A TWN-18_08272013 8/27/2013 1250h 8/30/2013 0945h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1308556-0058 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1308556-006A TWN-03_08282013 8/28/2013 0643h 8/30/2013 0945h 300.0-W Aqueous 1\11 df-cl
1 SEL Analy1es: CL
1308556-0068 N02/N03-W-353.2 fJl df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1308556-007 A TWN-02_08272013 8/27/2013 1440h 8/30/2013 0945h 300.0-W Aqueous f..i'l df-cl
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1308556-0078 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-Ilo2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1308556-008A TWN-65_08272013 8/27/2013 1207h 8/30/2013 0945h 300.0-W Aqueous 0 df-cl
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1308556-0088 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
Printed: 8/30/2013 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M [21"" RT c::r" CN E)""' TAT cf QC ~ HO~ HO~ HOK __
WORK ORDER Summary WorkOrder: 1308556 Page2 of2
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 9/11/2013
SampleiD Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1308556-009A PIE~01_08282013 8/28/2013 0730h 8/30/2013 0945h 300.0-W Aqueous rJI df-cl
1 SEL Anafytes: CL .
1308556-009B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SELAnalytes: N03N02N
1308556-0lOA PIEZ-02_08282013 8/28/2013 0655h 8/30/2013 0945h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
I SELAnalytes: CL
1308556-0IOB N02/N03-W-353.2 rJI df-no2/no3
1 SELAnalytes: N03N02N
1308556-0llA PIEZ-03_08282013 8/28/2013 0709h 8/30/2013 0945h 300.0-W Aqueous 1\11 df-cl
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1308556-0llB N02/N03-W-353.2 0 df-no2/no3
I SEL Analytas: N03N02N
1308556-0I2A TWN-60_08272013 8/27/2013 1515h 8/30/2013 0945h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
1 SELAnalytes: CL
1308556-012B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
Printed: 8/30/2013 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M 0 RT 0 CN 0 TAT :::J QC 0 HOK __ HOK __ HOK___ COC Emailed~---
AMERCIAN WEST
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 W. 3600 S. SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84115
PHoNE It [phone] TOLL FREE It [phone]
L~ '~' (80>),.._..., """'' AW~@Aw~-~•o•
WWW.AWAL-LABS.COM
CLIENT: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
ADDRESS: 6425 S. Hwy. 191
Blanding, UT 84511
CONTACT: Garrin Palmer
PHONE#: [phone] CELL#:
gpalmez@ener&Yfaels.com; [e-mail];
EMAIL: dtar~nerg:fael.s.com
PROJECT NAME: 3rd Quarter Nitrate '2.01~
PROJECT#:
PO#:
SAMPLER NAME: Tanner Holliday, Garrin Palmer
DATE TIME
SAMPU 10: SAMPLED SAMPLED
TWl'l-01R_08272013 8/27/2013 920
~ TWN-01_08272013 8/27/2013 1019
I TWN-07_08282013 8/28/2013 632
I TWl'l-04_08272013 8/27/2013 1207
; TWl'l-18_08272013 8/27/2013 1250
; TWl'l-03_08282013 8/28/2013 643
' 'TWN-02_08272013 8/27/2013 1440
I TWl'l-65_08272013 8/27/2013 1207
I PIEZ-01_08282013 8/28/2013 730
' PIEZ-02_08282013 8/28/2013 655
1 PIEZ-03_08282013 8/28/2013 709
t TWN-60_08272013 8/27/2013 1515
3 ·-re.'l"\r ~l"'"'"' gf'2.~/ n
:.:~:~~==I!D BY: ~ ..'"\ /1 /1"'" .Ll I /I I 0~2't{1) RECI!!NI!D BY:
SIGNATURE
PRINT NAMe! -\o;,_f\11~<""" Ho\[\J<;l'-'1 _./ TIM I!:
l\00 p ..... .,.N.w.,
I
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
ALL ANALVSUi WIU.. Bl! CONDUCTeD USlN<ill NELAP ACC:RI!DM'I!D MI!THODS AND AU. DATA WILL Bl! RI!PORTI!O USING
AWAL's STANDARD ANALYTE USTC AND RI!PORl'tNCJ UMfTS (PQL) UNLI!.SS SPI!CtFICALLY REQUESTED OTHI!RWl$1! ON THIS
CHAIN OF CUSTODY AND/OR ATTACHI!D DOCUMENTATION
QC LBVIIL! I TURN AROUND TIMB: UNLESS OTHER ARRANGI!M!!NTS HAV!!
BSBN MADE!, SJGINBD RI!PORTS WILL BE
3 STANDARD BMAILI!!D BY 5:00 PM ON 1'H!: CAY
THEY ARI! DUE.
.X INCLUDE EDD:
LOCUS UPLOAD
EXCEL
FIELD FILTERED FoR:
FoR CoMPLIANce WITH:
0 NELAP
0 RCRA
0 CWA
0 SDWA
0 ELAP I A2LA
0 NLLAP .. ~ 0' 0 NoN-COMPLIANCE a: 0 w >< &i 0 0 OTHER: z i[ "' ~ ... !2. z ~ t'l 5
0 0 0
"' 0 KNOWN HAZARDS u .J I!; Vl 0. ...... ::t. & IL :! N 0 < 0 tl "" II) 1!: SAMPLE CoMMENTs
2 w X X
2 w X X
2 w X X
2 w X X
2 w X X
2 w X X
2 w X X
2 w X X
2 w X X
2 w X X
2 w X X
2 w X X
--------DATI!: SPECIAL. INSTRUCTIONS: ..---TIM!!:
'R.I!LINQULSHED BY: -J DATI!: R~ DATI!:
SIGNATURE SJO
T'""'" ..------/ TiM!::
PRINT NAMe: PRINT NAME;
R&UNQUISHI!D BY: ~ R•c,~~ ~ --d DATB: Cf'(5 SICJNATURB -SoaNAT U.....-~
TlMB:
PruHT N.o.>.<.f-1 ~ ~-~r..~:'l-/ I T!.U: 'g'~(j J I) ~ PRINT NAME:
ReUNQUtsHED sv: DATE: RCC"IN .. D BY: 1 7 DATI!:
SIGNATURE S14)1AT\IIU!
TJMB: TIMe:
PRINT NAME: PRINT NAME:
IJ~g-r s-~
A W AL LAs SAMPLE SET #
PAGE OF
DUE DATE:
-
LABORATORY USE ONLY
s-.,..._woe ;~-)<;, , e ., .... D. DI!UVEIUID
2.~li!J<Y08
"'3 TntJottA.ATURs 0 -rY •c
4 RI!CECVI!.D BROKI!N/LE!AKIN<ill
(IMPROPERLY S~o)
y N
5 aoPERLY PRese~veo
I!CKI!D AT BI!NCH
y N
6 RBCI!IV.E!D WITHIN
c:!)LDINO TIMES N
COCTAPEWM:
1 P.AE:nN':" ON OUTER PACKAGE C) N NA
V N NA
2. CJ'OlQJ>I ON OUTER PACKAGE
3 PRESENT ON SAMPL~
Y N NA
4 UNBROKEN ON SAM@
Y N NA
OJSCRI!PANCil!S B!!TWI!I!N SAMPL:e:
LABeLS AND COC ~7
y N
Analysis
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
N02&N03
O&G
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TP04
Procedure:
Frequency:
Preservation Check Sheet
s le Set Ext
Preservative I .t_ ~ c.( r (o
pH<2H2 S04
pH<2 HzS04
pH>l2
NaOH
pH<2HN03
pH <2 H2S04 lv .. ~ v ... c: ltcs ./..,_, lkj' v;::;:
pH<2HCL I' IT -/Y
pH<2 H2S04
pH>9NaOH,
Zn Acetate
pH<2H2S04
pH <2 H_2S04
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from Lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
7
;;,.~ ,
doH
&--9
V.ef Vco;
I
/0 //
Yiu Vc l ,
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
If sample is not preserved, properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag COC, notify client if requested
Place client conversation on COC
Samples may be adjusted
All samplds requiring preservation
*
+
.A
#
•
The sample required additional preservative upon receipt.
The sample was received unpreserved
The Sample was received unpreserved and therefore preserved upon receipt.
The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH < 2 due to the sample matrix
The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH> __ due to the sample matrix interference
LabSetiD: 13>n~SJ~
/L
I
Jk~ I
ANA l YTI CAI l ABORATORifS
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: (80 I) 263-8687
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Garrin Palmer
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
TEL: [phone]
RE: 3rd Quarter Chloroform 2013
Dear Garrin Palmer: Lab Set ID: 1309103
American West Analytical Laboratories received 21 sample(s) on 9/6/2013 for the
analyses presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AWAL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) in Utah and Texas; and is
state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, and Missouri.
All analyses were performed in accordance to the NELAP protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation scope documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to calL
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
Thank You, Ky I e F . Digitally signed by Kyle F. Gross
ON: cn=Kyle F. Gross, o=AWAL,
ou=AWAL-Laboralory Director,
G roSS email=kyle@awal-labs com, c=US
Date: 2013 09.18 14:00:04 -06'00'
Approvedby: ~----------------------~
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 9/18/2013 Page I of 55
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA ore pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols1 Pcr1incnt sampling infonnation is located on the attm:hed COC This report is provided for the cxclusi\'c usc or the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent usc oft he nome of this company or any mcmbcr ufits stafl~ or reproduction of this rcpor1 in connection with I he aclvcrtiscm~;nt, promotion or sale ofa11y product or prol:css, or in c.:onncction with the re-publication of this report fo1 any
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
ANALYTICAL LAOORATORIES Project: 3rd Quarter Chloroform 2013
Lab Set ID: 1309103
Date Received: 9/6/2013 1145h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
463 West 3600 South
1309103-001A TW4-25 09032013 9/3/2013 1240h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
~alt Lake City, UT 84115 1309103-001B TW4-25_09032013 9/3/2013 1240h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1309103-001C TW4-25 09032013 9/3/2013 1240h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Phone: [phone] 03-002A TW4-24_09032013 9/3/2013 1255h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1309103-002B TW4-24 09032013 9/3/2013 1255h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Toll Free: [phone] 1309103-002C TW4-24_09032013 9/3/2013 1255h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Fax: [phone]C/5030C
~-mail: [e-mail] 1309103-003A TW4-04_09032013 9/3/2013 1347h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
13091 03-003B TW4-04 09032013 9/3/2013 1347h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
web: www.awal-labs.com 13091 03-003C TW4-04 09032013 9/3/2013 1347h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1309103-004A MW-04 09032013 9/3/2013 1335h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Kyle F. Gross 13091 03-004B MW-04_09032013 9/3/2013 1335h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1309103-004C MW-04 09032013 9/3/2013 1335h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Laboratory Director 8260C/5030C
13091 03-00SA TW4-19 09032013 9/3/2013 1030h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Jose Rocha 1309103-00SB TW4-19_09032013 9/3/2013 1030h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
QA Officer 13091 03-00SC TW4-19 09032013 9/3/2013 1030h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1309103-006A MW-26_09032013 9/3/2013 1325h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1309103-006B MW-26 09032013 9/3/2013 1325h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1309103-006C MW-26 09032013 9/3/2013 1325h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1309103-007 A TW4-22 09032013 9/3/2013 1305h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
13091 03-007B TW4-22 09032013 9/3/2013 1305h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1309103-007C TW4-22 09032013 9/3/2013 1305h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1309103-008A TW4-20_09032013 9/3/2013 1315h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1309103-008B TW4-20 09032013 9/3/2013 1315h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1309103-008C TW4-20_09032013 9/3/2013 1315h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1309103-009A MW-32 09042013 9/4/2013 1240h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1309103-009B MW-32_09042013 9/4/2013 1240h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1309103-009C MW-32_09042013 9/4/2013 1240h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1309103-010A TW4-05R_09042013 9/4/2013 1407h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1309103-010B TW 4-0SR _ 09042013 9/4/2013 1407h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Report Date: 9/18/20 13 Page 2 of 55
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infunnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive nsc oft he nddrcsscc. Privileges of
subscqllcnt use of the OilmC of this mmpany or any member or its stofl, 01 reproduction of this report in co11ncction with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of Lhis report for any
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 3rd Quarter Chloroform 2013
American West Lab SetiD: 1309103
ANA LYTIC A L LABORATORIF:S Date Received: 9/6/2013 1145h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
1309103-010C TW4-05R 09042013 9/4/2013 1407h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
463 West 3600 South 1309103-011A TW4-70_09052013 9/5/2013
8260C/5030C
0710h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
~alt Lake City, UT 84115 1309103-011B TW4-70_09052013 9/5/2013 0710h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1309103-011C TW4-70 09052013 9/5/2013 0710h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1309103-012A TW4-31_09052013 9/5/2013 0655h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Phone: [phone] 1309103-012B TW4-31_09052013 9/5/2013 0655h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Toll Free: [phone] 1309103-012C TW4-31_09052013 9/5/2013 0655h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Fax: [phone]C/5030C
~-mail: [e-mail] 1309103-013A TW4-23_09052013 9/5/2013 0704h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1309103-013B TW4-23 09052013 9/5/2013 0704h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
web: www.awal-labs.com 1309103-013C TW4-23_09052013 9/5/2013 0704h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1309103-014A TW4-08_09052013 9/5/2013 0710h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1309103-014B TW4-08_09052013 9/5/2013 0710h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Kyle F. Gross 1309103-014C TW4-08_09052013 9/5/2013 0710h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Laboratory Director 8260C/5030C
1309103-015A TW4-09_09052013 9/5/2013 0723h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Jose Rocha 1309103-015B TW4-09_09052013 9/5/2013 0723h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
QA Officer 1309103-015C TW4-09_09052013 9/5/2013 0723h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1309103-016A TW4-16 09052013 9/5/2013 0729h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1309103-016B TW4-16_09052013 9/5/2013 0729h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1309103-016C TW4-16_09052013 9/5/2013 0729h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1309103-017A TW4-26_09052013 9/5/2013 0748h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1309103-017B TW4-26 09052013 9/5/2013 0748h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1309103-017C TW4-26 09052013 9/5/2013 0748h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1309103-018A TW4-06_09052013 9/5/2013 0757h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1309103-018B TW4-06 09052013 9/5/2013 0757h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1309103-018C TW4-06_09052013 9/5/2013 0757h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1309103-019A TW4-05_09052013 9/5/2013 0805h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1309103-019B TW4-05_09052013 9/5/2013 0805h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1309103-019C TW4-05 09052013 9/5/2013 0805h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1309103-020A TW4-18_09052013 9/5/2013 0815h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1309103-020B TW4-18_09052013 9/5/2013 0815h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Report Date: 9/18/2013 Page 3 of 55
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent usc of the name of this company or any member of its staft~ or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or p1ocess, or in eonncction with the re-publication of this report for any
ANA LY TI CAl LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Client:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Date Received:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
3rd Quarter Chloroform 2013
1309103
9/6/2013 1145h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID
1309103-020C TW4-18 09052013
1309103-021A Trip Blank
Date Collected
9/5/2013 0815h
9/3/2013
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Matrix Analysis
Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Report Date: 9/18/2013 Page 4 of 55
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA nre pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pcnlnent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee Privileges of
suhscqncntusc oft he nome of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction oftl1is report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or prOl:css, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
ANALYTICAL lABORATORft '
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Inorganic Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
3rd Quarter Chloroform 2013
1309103
9/6/2013
9/3, 9/4, & 9/5/2013
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation of all
samples were performed within the method holding times. All samples were properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD:
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 9/18/2013 Page 5 of 55
All analyses applic<J.blc to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA ur~ pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is Jocatctl on the attached CDC This report is provitled for the exclusive ust! of the addressee Privileges of
subsequent usc of the nmnc of this company or any member of its staft: or reproduction or this rcpo11 in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1309103
Project: 3rd Quarter Chloroform 2013
Analyte Result
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
OC SUMMARY_REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
Units Method MDL
Reporting
Limit
QC Type: LCS
Amount
Spiked
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R59066 Date Analyzed: 09/12/2013 1148h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 5.02 mg/L E300.0 0.0114 1.00 5.000 0 100
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R59048 Date Analyzed: 09/12/2013 1852h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.969 mg/L E353.2 0.00252 0.100 1.000 0 96.9
Limits
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QAOfficer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 9/18/2013 Page 48 of 55
:analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols, Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee, Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mbcr of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process, 01 in connection with the re-publication ofthls report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: (80 l) 263-8686, Toll Free: [phone], Fax: (80 l) 263-8687
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Lab Set ID: 1309103
Project: 3rd Quarter Chloroform 2013
Analyte Result Units Method
Lab Sample ID: MB-R59066 Date Analyzed: 09/12/20 13 1122h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride < 1.00 mg/L E300.0
Lab Sample ID: MB-R59048 Date Analyzed: 09/12/2013 185lh
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) < 0.100 mg/L E353.2
MDL
0.0114
0.00252
Reporting
Limit
1.00
0.100
Dept: we
QC Type: MBLK
Amount
Spiked
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC Limits .
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt "'e RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 9/18/2013 Page 49 of 55
; analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA arc performed in accordance to N GLAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnalion is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mbcr of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any p1oduct or process, 01 in connection with the re-publication of this report for llJlY purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1309103
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
_Q_C__SUMMA_RY __ RE_PQRT _
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
Project: 3rd Quarter Chloroform 2013 QC Type: MS
Analyte Result Units Method
Lab Sample ID: 1309103-001AMS Date Analyzed: 09/12/2013 1238h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 2,540 mg/L E300.0
Lab Sample ID: 1309103-010AMS Date Analyzed: 09/12/2013 1834h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.96 mg/L E300.0
Lab Sample ID: 1309103-001BMS Date Analyzed: 09/12/2013 1902h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 16.6 mg/L E353.2
Lab Sample ID: 1309103-01SBMS Date Analyzed: 09/12/2013 1936h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 14.8 mg/L E353.2
MDL
5.70
0.0114
0.0252
0.0252
Reporting
Limit
500
1.00
1.00
1.00
Amount
Spiked
2,500
5.000
10.00
10.00
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
119 96.9
0.043 98.4
5.69 110
4.03 107
Limits
90-110
90-110
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD Ref. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
ReportDate: 9/18/2013 Page50of55
: analyses applicable to the CW A, SOW A, and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mbcr of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: (80 I) 263-8687 Laboratory Director
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES QC SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Lab Set ID: 1309103 Dept: we
Project: 3rd Quarter Chloroform 2013 QC Type: MSD
--~
Reporting Amount Spike Ref. RPD Ref. RPD
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount •f.REC Limits Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Lab Sample 10: 1309103-001AMSD Date Analyzed: 09/12/2013 1304h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 2,520 mg/L E300.0 5.70 500 2,500 119 96.1 90-110 2540 0.778 20
Lab Sample ID: 1309103-0lOAMSD Date Analyzed: 09/12/2013 1859h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 5.11 mg/L E300.0 0.0114 1.00 5.000 0.043 101 90-110 4.96 2.98 20 -Lab Sample ID: 1309103-00IBMSD Date Analyzed: 09/12/2013 1903h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 16.1 mg/L E353.2 0.0252 1.00 10.00 5.69 104 90-I 10 16.6 3.49 10
Lab Sample ID: 1309103-0lSBMSD Date Analyzed: 09/12/2013 1937h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 14.5 mg.IL E353.2 0.0252 1.00 10.00 4.03 105 90-110 14.8 1.57 10
Report Date: 9/18/2013 Page 51 of 55
\ analyses applicable to the CWA. SOW A, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC~ This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mbcr of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement. pmmotion or sale of any p1oduct or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1309103
Project: 3rd Quarter Chloroform 2013
Analyte Result
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Units Method MDL
Reporting
Limit
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: LCS
Amount
Spiked
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
Lab Sample ID: LCS VOC 090913A Date Analyzed: 09/09/2013 0715h
Test Code: 8260-W
Chloroform
Methylene chloride
Surr: I ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
Lab Sample ID: LCS VOC 090913B
Test Code: 8260-W
Chloroform
Methylene chloride
Surr: I ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromotluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
Lab Sample ID: LCS VOC 091013A
Test Code: 8260-W
Chloroform
Methylene chloride
Surr: I ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromotluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
20.2 J.Lg/L SW8260C
20.9 J.Lg/L SW8260C
52.2 J.Lg/L SW8260C
47.6 J.Lg/L SW8260C
51.6 J.Lg/L SW8260C
48.4 J.Lg/L SW8260C
Date Analyzed: 09/09/2013 16llh
19.1 J.Lg/L SW8260C
20.4 J.Lg/L SW8260C
52.8 J.Lg/L SW8260C
45.6 J.Lg/L SW8260C
52.2 J.Lg/L SW8260C
48.4 J.Lg/L SW8260C -Date Analyzed: 09/ I 0/20 \3 07 40h
20.8 J.Lg/L SW8260C
23.0 J.Lg/L SW8260C
53.0 J.Lg/L SW8260C
45.9 J.Lg/L SW8260C
52.0 J.Lg/L SW8260C
47.0 J.Lg/L SW8260C
0.277 2.00 20.00 0 101
0.155 2.00 20.00 0 105
50.00 104
50.00 95.1
50.00 103
50.00 96.8
0.277 2.00 20.00 0 95.4
0.155 2.00 20.00 0 102
50.00 106
50.00 91.3
50.00 104
50.00 96.8
0.277 2.00 20.00 0 104
0.155 2.00 20.00 0 115
50.00 106
50.00 91.8
50.00 104
50.00 94.0
Limits
67-132
32-185
76-138
77-121
67-128
81-135
67-132
32-185
76-138
77-121
67-128
81-135
67-132
32-185
76-138
77-121
67-128
81-135
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 9/18/2013 Page 52 of 55
analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA arc performed in accordance toN ELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addrcsscc1 Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
rnbcr of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be gran led only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1309103
Project: 3rd Quarter Chloroform 2013
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: MB VOC 090913A Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 8260-W
Carbon tetrachloride < 1.00
Chloroform < 1.00
Chloromethane < 1.00
Methylene chloride < 1.00
Surr: I ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 55.8
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 46.2
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 52.4
Surr: Toluene-d8 48.7
Lab Sample ID: MB VOC 0909138 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 8260-W
Carbon tetrachloride < 1.00
Chloroform < 1.00
Chloromethane < 1.00
Methylene chloride < 1.00
Surr: I ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 54.7
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 47.4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 51.7
Surr: Toluene-d8 48.4
Lab Sample ID: MB VOC 091013A Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 8260-W -
Carbon tetrachloride < 1.00
Chloroform < 1.00
Chloromethane < 1.00
Methylene chloride < 1.00
Surr: I ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 56.6
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 47.6
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 53.0
Surr: Toluene-d8 47.8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MBLK
Reporting Amount Spike Ref.
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount 8/aREC
09/09/2013 0754h
I! giL SW8260C 0.137 1.00
I! giL SW8260C 0.277 1.00
I! giL SW8260C 0.127 1.00
I! giL SW8260C 0.155 1.00
l!g/L SW8260C 50.00 112
I! giL SW8260C 50.00 92.4
I! giL SW8260C 50.00 105
I! giL SW8260C 50.00 97.3
09/09/2013 1650h
I! giL SW8260C 0.137 1.00
I! giL SW8260C 0.277 1.00
I! giL SW8260C 0.127 1.00
I! giL SW8260C 0.155 1.00
I! giL SW8260C 50.00 109
I! giL SW8260C 50.00 94.8
J!g/L SW8260C 50.00 103
I! giL SW8260C 50.00 96.8
09/10/2013 0818h
I! giL SW8260C 0.137 1.00
J!giL SW8260C 0.277 1.00
J!g/L SW8260C 0.127 1.00
J!giL SW8260C 0.155 1.00
I! giL SW8260C 50.00 I 13
I! giL SW8260C 50.00 95.1
I! giL SW8260C 50.00 106
J!_g/L SW8260C 50.00 95.7
Limits
76-138
77-121
67-128
81-135
76-138
77-121
67-128
81-135
76-138
77-121
67-128
81-135
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 9/ 18/20 13 Page 53 of 55
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mbcr of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1309103
Project: 3rd Quarter Chloroform 2013
Analyte
Lab Sample ID: 1309103-007CMS
Test Code: 8260-W
Chloroform
Methylene chloride
Surr: I ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
Lab Sample ID: 1309103-014CMS
Test Code: 8260-W
Chloroform
Methylene chloride
Surr: I ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
Result
Date Analyzed:
12,100
2,320
5,480
4,380
5,280
4,720
Date Analyzed:
20.9
23.3
55.7
45.5
53.1
46.4
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Units Method MDL
09/09/20 13 0910h
J.lg/L SW8260C 27.7
J.lg/L SW8260C 15.5
J.lg/L SW8260C
J.lg/L SW8260C
J.lg/L SW8260C
J.lg/L SW8260C -09/10/2013 0015h
J.lg/L SW8260C 0.277
J.lg/L SW8260C 0.155
J.lg/L SW8260C
J.lg/L SW8260C
J.lg/L SW8260C
J.lg/L SW8260C
Reporting
Limit
200
200
2.00
2.00
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Amount
Spiked
2,000
2,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
20.00
20.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
Garrin Palmer
MSVOA
MS
Spike Ref.
Amount "'oREC
9640 124
0 116
110
87.6
106
94.4
0 105
0 117
Ill
91.0
106
92.7
Limits
50-146
30-192
72-151
80-128
80-124
77-129
50-146
30-192
72-151
80-128
80-124
77-129
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 9/18/2013 Page 54 of 55
! analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mbcr of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee \Viii be granted only on contact.. This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1309103
Project: 3rd Quarter Chloroform 2013
Analyte
Lab Sample JD: 1309103-007CMSD
Test Code: 8260-W
Chloroform
Methylene chloride
Surr: I ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
Lab Sample JD: 1309103-014CMSD
Test Code: 8260-W
Chloroform
Methylene chloride
Surr: I ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
Result
Date Aoalyzed:
11,600
2,240
5,360
4,350
5,220
4,670
Date Aoalyzed:
22.1
24.6
56.0
45.5
53.5
46.4
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: (801) 263-R687
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Units Method
09/09/20 13 0929h
Jlg/L SW8260C
Jlg/L SW8260C
Jlg/L SW8260C
Jlg/L SW8260C
Jlg/L SW8260C
Jlg/L SW8260C -09/10/2013 0034h
Jlg/L SW8260C
Jlg/L SW8260C
Jlg/L SW8260C
Jlg/L SW8260C
Jlg/L SW8260C
Jlg/L SW8260C
MDL
27.7
15.5
0.277
0.155
Reporting
Limit
200
200
2.00
2.00
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MSD
Amount
Spiked
2,000
2,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
20.00
20.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
Spike Ref.
Amount
9640
0
0
0
%REC
98.2
112
107
87.0
104
93.4
Ill
123
112
91.0
107
92.8
Limits
50-146
30-192
72-151
80-128
80-124
77-129
50-146
30-192
72-151
80-128
80-124
77-129
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt 'Ye RPD Limit Qual
12100 4.34 25
2320 3.60 25
20.9 5.71 25
23.3 5.30 25
Report Date: 9/18/2013 Page 55 of 55
1 anaJyscs applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sarnpJing information is located on the attached COC This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mbcr of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advcrtiscmcnl promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this n:port for any purpose other than for the addressee will be grc:llllcd only on contacl This company accepts no responsibility
American West Analytical Laboratories UL
Denison
WORK ORDER Summary WorkOrder: 1309103
Due Date: 9/17/2013
Page 1 of4
Client:
Client ID:
Project:
Comments:
Sample ID
1309103-001A
1309103-0018
1309103-001C
13091 03-002A
1309103-002B
13091 03-002C
1309103-003A
1309103-0038
!309103-003C
1309103-004A
1309103-0048
1309103-004C
1309103-00SA
1309103-00SB
1309103-00SC
1309103-006A
Printed: 9/6/2013
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
DENlOO
3rd Quarter Chloroform 2013
Contact: Garrin Palmer
QC Level: III WO Type: Project
PA Rush. QC 3 (Summary/No chromatograms). RL of 1 ppm for Chloride and VOC and 0.1 ppm for N02/N03. Expected levels provided by client-see
Jenn. J-flag what we can't meet. EIM Locus and EDD-Denison. Email Group.;
Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
TW4-25_09032013 9/3/2013 1240h 9/6/2013 1145h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-we
I SEL Analytes: CL
N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL Ana/ytes: N03N02N
8260-W ~ VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
TW4-24_09032013 9/3/2013 1255h 9/6/2013 J145h 300.0-W Aqueous VI df-we
1 SEL Analyter: CL
N02/N03-W-353.2 0 df-no2/no3
1 SEL Anatylq: N03N02N
8260-W ~ VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I # ofSurr: 4
TW4-04_09032013 9/3/2013 1347h 9/6/2013 1145h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-we
I SEL thralytes: CL
N02/N03-W-353.2 0 df-no2/no3
I SELAnalytes: N03N02N
8260-W 21 VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Ana/ytes: 4 I # ofSurr: 4
~-04_09032013 9/3/2013 1335h 9/6/2013 1145h 300.0-W Aqueous VI df-we
I SEL Ana/yJes: CL --N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SELAnalytes: N03N02N
8260-W ~ VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
TW4-19_09032013 9/3/2013 1030h 9/6/2013 ll45h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-we
I SEL Analytes: CL
N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Ana/ytes: N03N02N
8260-W 21 VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
~W-26_09032013 9/3/2013 1325h 9/6/2013 114511 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-we
1 SEL Ana/ytes: CL
3
FORLABORATORYUSEONLY[filloutonpage1]: %M ~ RT ff' CN ff TAT~ QC~ HOK___ COC Em-ailed '/ ._. t t .c -<--\.
WORK ORDER Summary WorkOrder: 1309103 Page2 of4
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 9/17/2013
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1309103-0068 ~VV-26_09032013 9/3/2013 1325h 9/6/2013 1145h N02/N03-VV-353.2 Aqueous ~ df-no2/no3
1 SELAnalytes: N03N02N
1309103-006C 8260-VV ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 41# ofSurr: 4
1309103-007A TVV4-22_09032013 9/3/2013 130511 9/6/2013 11 45h 300.0-VV Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL AIJa/ytos: CL
1309103--0078 N02/N03-VV-353.2 IJI df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analyies: N03N02N
1309103-007C 8260-VV ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Ana/ytes: 41# ofSurr: 4
1309103--00SA TVV4-20_09032013 9/3/2013 J315h 9/6/2013 114511 300.0-VV Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SELAnalytes: CL
1309103-0088 N02/N03-VV-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analf/I!S: N03N~2N
1309103-00SC 8260-VV 2l VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 41# ofSurr: 4
1309103--009A ~-32-09042013 9/4/2013 1240h 9/6/2013 1145h 300.0-VV Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Jjnalytes: CL
1309103-0098 N02/N03-VV-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
13091 03--009C 8260-VV ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4/# ofSurr: 4
1309103-0IOA TVV4-05R_09042013 9/4/2013 1407h 9/6/2013 1145h 300.0-VV Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Aua/ytes: CL
1309103--0lOB N02/N03-VV-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL Ana{vtes: N03N02N
1309103-010C 8260-VV 2l VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 41# ofSurr: 4
1309103-011A TVV4-70_09052013 9/5/2013 0710h 9/6/2013 1145h 300.0-VV :Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL An_a(vtes: CL
1309103-0118 N02/N03-VV-353.2 VI df-no2/no3
I SEL 1/nalyles: N03N02N -1309103-0llC 8260-VV ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Ana~J:.tes: 41# ofSurr: 4
1309103-012A TVV4-31_09052013 9/5/2013 0655h 9/6/2013 1145h 300.0-VV Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1309103-0128 N02/N03-VV-353.2 &'] df-no2/no3
1 SELAna/yte.r: NOJNOlN
1309103-012C 8260-VV 21 VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytos: 4/#ofSurr: 4
Printed: 9/6/2013 FOR LAB ORA TORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %MD RT O CNO TAT 0 QCD HOK ___ HOK ___ HOK ___ coc Emailed
WORK ORDER Summary WorkOrder: 1309103 Page3 of4
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. DueDate: 9/17/2013
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1309103-013A TW4-23_09052013 9/5/2013 0704h 9/6/2013 1145h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1309103-013B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df -no2/no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1309103-013C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4/# ofSurr: 4
1309103-014A TW4-08 _09052013 9/S/20 13 071 Oh 9/6/2013 114Sh 300.0-W Aqueous 01 df-wc
1 SEL A1tal !iJS: CL
1309103-014B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Ana/ytes: N03N02N
1309103-014C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4/# ofSurr: 4
1309103-015A TW4-09_09052013 9/5/2013 0723h 9/6/2013 1145h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Ana!ytes: CL
1309103-015B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL Anal;1tes: N03N02N -1309103-0lSC 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 41 # ofSurr: 4
1309103-016A TW4-16_09052013 9/5/2013 0729h 9/6/2013 1145h 300.0-W Aqueous 01 df-wc
I SEL Analytes: CL
1309103-016B N02/N03-W-353.2 v l df-no21no3
1 SELAnalyte,.f: N03N02N
1309103-016C 8260-W 1!!1 VOCFridge 3
Test GrOIIP." 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: .4/ # oj Surr : 4
1309103-0l?A TW4-26_09052013 9/5/2013 0748h 9/6/2013 I 14Sh 300.0-W Aqueous VI df-wc
I SEL AJ1a/yics: CL -
1309103-017B N02/N03-W-353.2 0 df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytl!s: N03N02N
1309103-0I?C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 41# ofSurr: 4
1309103-018A TW4-06_09052013 9/5/2013 0757h 91612013 1145h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SELAnalytes: CL
1309103-0 18B N02/N03-W-353.2 VI df-no2/no3
1 SEL .i1nalyt<rs: N03N02N
1309103-0ISC 8260-W 21 VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 41# ofSurr: 4
1309103-019A TW4-05_09052013 9/5/20 13 0805h 9/6/2013 1145h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SELAna/yte.~: CL
1309103-0198 N02/N03-W-353.2 VI df-no2/no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
Printed: 9/612013 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M 0 RTO CN D TAT 0 QC O HOK ___ HOK ___ HOK ___ COC Emailed
WORK ORDER Summary WorkOrder: 1309103 Page4 of4
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. DueDate: 9/17/2013
SampleiD Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1309103-019C TVV4-05_09052013 9/5/2013 0805h 9/6/2013 1145h 8260-W Aqueous ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
13091 03-020A TVV4-18_09052013 9/5/2013 0815h 9/6/2013 1145h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SELAnalytes: CL
13091 03-020B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no21no3
1 SEL A11afytes: N03N02N
1309103-020C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
1309103-021A Trip Blank 9/3/2013 9/6/2013 ll45h 8260-W Aqueous ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 /# ofSurr: 4
Printed: 9/6/2013 FORLABORATORYUSEONLY[filloutonpage1]: %M 0 RT 0 CN 0 TAT 0 QCO HOK __ HOK __ HOK___ COC Emailed,__ __ _
AMERICAN WEST
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 W . 3600 S. SALT LAKE CITY. UT 84115
PHONE # [phone] TOLL FREE # [phone]
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
ALL ANAL VIOlS Wll.L BE CONOUCTE:D USING NEl.AP ACCRBOfri!ID METHODS AND ALL DATA WlLL Ill! RePORTI!D USCNa
AWAL's $TANDA.A.D ANALYTE LISTS AND R~PORTINCJ UMJTS (PQL) \JNU!SS SPBClFJCALLY REQUESTeD OTHt:RWtsl! ON THIS
CHAIN OP CUSTODY AND{OR A'TTACHI!!!D DOCUMI!NTATION
IJ<J11({)
AWAL LAs SAMPLE SET#
PAGE 1 OF 2
1:'-"~ FAX# [phone] EMAJL [e-mail] I QC LBVBL: I TURN AROUND TIMB: UNLESs OTHER ARRANCJeMeNTs HAVI! I, DuE OATS: I IIBEN MADI!, BIGNI!D RI!IPORTS WILL Be
WWW.AWAL-LABS.COM 3 STANDARD BMALBD ~:;~o~R=:~; TH• DAY
CLIENT: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. X INCLUDE EOD: LABORATORY USB ONLY
I LOCUS UPLOAD
ADDRESS: 6425 8. Hwy. 191 ' EXCEL SAM,.,.. w ... o: C"', 1
Bl "': UT 84511 FIELD FILTERED FOR: rs---~ ~ ,)( an.ung, 1 ~ ~ l tANa QI<UV•Mm
CoNTACT: Gartin Palmer 2 AMBlE,;.. o~
1 FoR CoMPUANCB WITH:
PHONE #: [phone] CELt.#: 0 NEL.AP 3 TEMPBRATURI! ~ •c
gpulmlli@'ul""'J'J"els.com; [e-mail]; 0 RCRA
EMAJL: cl~eg:Ifuek.cma 0 CW A 4 ReceJVBD BRoKeN/LeAKIN<>
0 SDWA <3....,"""'-YS........,)
PROJECT NAME: 3rd quarter Chloroform 2013 O ELAP / A 2L.A * N J.
~ D NLLAP ·j(-~ t0h,~\.o
PROJECT #: ~ ~ q D NoN-COMPLIANCE S GoPUJ.Y p~.....,.ve<> ~ ~ i2 g "" 0 OTHER: Y • N
PO#: ;( ~ !2. ~ g ,c ~AT ... NCJ1
SAMPLER NAME· Tanner Holliday, Garrin Palmer ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ N . U ~ li!; 5S ~ KNOWN HAZARDS 6 RECEIVeD WITHIN D T .. ...... ::!:. ll I & HOLDING TIMES ATE IME ~ ~ a _ O rv\ N
SAMPLE ID: SAMPLED SAMPLED '* rn r;.; tl > SAMPLE COMMENTS "-.__)
TW4-25_09032013 9/3/2013 1240 5 W X X X
: TW4-24_09032013 9/3/2013 1255 5 ·w X X x coc TAPE wu,
1 TW4-04 09032013 9/3/2013 1347 5 W X X X 1 PRes•NT ON OuTeR PAcKA<>e -Q N NA
: MW-04 09032013 9/3/2013 1335 5 w X X X i -2 BROKEN ON 0UTI!R PACKAQI!
TW4-19_09032013 9/3/2013 1030 5 W X X X a N NA
, MW-26_09032013 9/3/2013 1325 5 w x x x 3 ~RESENT o~ SAMPL·e
TW4-22 09032013 9/3/2013 1305 5 'W X X X ~+ ·u·'· 1'1 8" ~. I 4 -r-"'"""' \; u..JL_I) 'l.\e,. UNBROKEN ON SAMP'(.',.}
I TW4-20_09032013 9/3/2013 1315 5 W X X X ~ D"vl..O ~11::._( ];,... 1;;:: y N ~
I MW-32_09042013 9/4/2013 1240 5 .. w X X X Dri<: ...... AN<!ii!S BI!TWEBN SAMPU!
1 TW4-0SR 09042013 9/4/2013 1407 5 W X X X LAal:l.: AND COC RecoRD? TW4-70_~9052013 9/S/2013 710 5 W X X X y (j
I TW4-31~09052013 9/S/2013 655 p W X X X
~ ! TW4-23_09052013 9/5/2013 704 5 W X X X
.RELINQUISHED BY: ~~ il lA. l . ..A DATI: I ~EC!!JV_;p'"OY: 0ATE: s I
SIC,NATURE '-.) o.J\.1"\(lj(.. J7 ~) ~~5 Z.01:3 Su>l"('i'URE PECIAL NSTRUCTIONS:
__../ \I J\' \ ~ T'lfole• TIMe: t--------------
PRINT NAMa,·-I "'1\ne.-li o '(l.~>,..j \100 /.PRINT NAME'
ReuNQUISHEo BY: " O.Anr: ./ REcEIVED :Jl ~ _/7 / PATE: /', See the Analytical Scope of Work for Reporting Limits and
SIGNATURE _/ s...,.,..,.,'I.E a..,( _J/J. C7::L ~ '7-& • ::) VQC anaJyte Jist.
T~ / ol '\( TIMe·
PRINT NAME' / Plla<r NAME'...[:. { t/L '" 4-/a....,.l, (.. ./ . //(/<(
ReUNQUtsHED sv: ' :0ATe: ~ecerveo sv: ~ I PATe:
SUJNATURB StONATURI!
1'1M01 jTIMe'
PRINT NAMe: PRINT NAMe:
RI!UNQUISHI!D BY: DATB: RI!CI!IVED BY: IDAT~:
SICJNATURI! 51C3NATURB
TIMe: "rlMe:
PRINT NAM!!: P_..R ... IN .. T_.N~A ... M ... E'"O, _______________ _I_ ___________ _..IL_
AMERICAN WEST
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 W. 3600 S. SALT LAKE CITY. UT 84115
PHONE # [phone] TOLL FREE # [phone]
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
ALL ANALYSlS WILL BE CONDUCTED USING NELAP ACCREDn'ED MI!THODS AND Al.L DATA Wii..L Ill! REPORTED USINCJ
AWAL's STANDARD ANALYTe USTS AND RE!PORTJNQ UMrTS (PQL) UNLESS SiP&CIFICAUY RI!QUI!!ST!!D OTHII!IRWISE ON THIS
CHAIN OF CU.STODY AND/OR ATTACHI!!D DOCUMENTATION
/]fJ1!(3
AWAL LAB SAMPLE SET#
PAGE 2 OF 2
1:~~ FAX# [phone] EMAIL [e-mail] I QC LEVEL: I TURN AROUND TIME: UNLESS OTHER ARRANGBMONTS HAVI! I DUE DATE: BIII!!!N MADE. S!ONED REPORTS WILL BE
WWW.AWAL·LABS.COM 3 STANDARD EMAIU!D ~~;y-o~"""':.:: THE DAY
CLIENT: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. X INCLUDE EDD: LABORATORY USE ONLY
LOCUS UPLOAD
ADDRESS: 6425 S. Hwy. 191 EXCEL SAMPLES WERO: I'"" J ..)(
Blanding UT 84511 FIELD FILTERED FoR: er
' 1 5H[FIP£D HAND DBltVERED
CoNTACT: Gartin Palmer 2 AMBieNT o• <.::D\
[phone] FOR COMPLIANCB WITH: C7
PHONE #: CELL #: 0 NELAP 3 TEMPBRATURB ~ °C
e:[e-mail]; [e-mail]; 0 RCRA
EMAIL: a~9~e11o .• 110Ja o cwA 4 R•c:~!Veo BRoK~NIL•AKIN"
3rd quart~r Chloroform 2013 ° SDWA CJoPeRLY SeALED) PROJECT NAME: 0 ELAP I A2LA N
...._ 0 NLLAP
PRoJECT #: ~ ~ ~ 0 NoN-CoMPLIANCE s ~PERLY PRusRvl!o ~~~ g ~ 00THER: Y N
PO #: ~ I= '2.. .._ )5 HECK.D AT DUNC:H
SAMPLER NAME: Tanner Holliday, Garrin Palmer ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ v N ~==.:::.:.:...:.::==--===================:::;:=====:;::;;;=====;.! u ~ 2: iil ~ KNOWN HAZARDS 6 REC:EIV~D WITHIN
a. ........ "t-• e -··T DATE TIME u. li N ~ u & ~~ IMES 0 ( 0 ... 0 N
SAMPLE 10: SAMPLED SAMPLED * Ill 1!!: 0 > SAMPLE COMMENTS
TW4-08_09052013 9/5/2013 710 5 ·w X X X
: TW4-09_09052013 9/5/2013 723 5 rw X X X ~----------------------~~----~---------------------t-----------1~---------t--f--t---1----r---t---t---1---1r--~---1---1~--~--f---~------------------------~~~cocTAPe~AZ:
I TW4-16_09052013 9/5/2013 729 5 'W X X X l OESENT ON OUTOR PACKAGE Y N NA
• TW4-26_09052013 9/5/2013 748 5 W X X X 2 ~FOJ(DI ON 0UTIIR PACKAGII!.
TW4-06_09052013 9/5/2013 757 5 W x x x \!.) N NA
' TW4-05_09052013 9/5/2013 805 5 W X X X :3 PRE&ENT ON SAMPLE Ct
y N V
TW4-18_09052013. 9/5/2013 815 5 W X X X
4 UNI!!ROKI!N ON SAMP~ &l
. TRIP BLANK , 9/3/2013 3 w x y N ~
I TEMP BLANK 9/5/2013 1 w ~-----------------------------------------------------t-----------i----------ir-1~1r---t---1r--1r---~--t---i---;----t---i---1~--~-i~------------------------~ D~cRePANc~sB•TWRENSAMP~ r------------------------------------------------------t-----------i----------1r-1r-1r---t---1~-1~--t---+---f---1r---t---i---1~~~-i~------------------------~ LABE~ANDC0Cc::>RD7
I
l
ReUNQUISHI!!D sv:-'""'\. I ) J' /. J _ DATI!.: ReceJVE~Y'l DATe:
SIGNATURE ~f.I/VI.iJt_ 1-/a-f/~} :-4/5/Z.Oi.:S SIC3NA..J"'R• SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: ~ 11/j'l TiM"' I/ TIMe: 1------------
PRINT NAME'-I "''"1 c (" H 0 ' cl"' "\ 11 0 0 fiS"Ritll 1\!AM-.:
REUNQUISHEO BY' o,.,r., ../ Re~IV~:: ll/1. II .1 04T~l / ·" See the Analytical Scope of Work for Reporting Limits and SI~NATUR8 / 5JGNA'f€e-l ~ f'{ f! -/ ' VQC analyte list.
PRINT NAMe, TlMY PRIJ<T NAME: b { ~... -~ t TJME: J / l{)
RELINQUlSHIED BY: DATE: RBCI!.IVED BY: I I DATI!:
SIGNATURE SIGNATURE
TIME: TIME:
PRINT NAMe: PRlNT NAME:
ReUNQUISHI!.D BY: DATE: R-I!.C.lVI!D BY: DATI!.:
SIGNATURE SICJNATURE
TIME: i iM'I!I:
,PRINT NAME: PRINT NAME: __ _
-
A WAL -Analytical Scope ofW ork
White Mesa Mill Blanding Utah
Page 11 of 13
il.'aAI'Ii!!nniffanM:': /~, . . :~--,.> . -,.-?t ~~ ~~~~ i ~ . .-....... f~, -~ <-·' :11(:::.:.' • .;,., ~-~~~ ~-:}~dfi :Js:.'':!!·. m-r
~Jt n ~f~ t~~~ -~~ ~" 'lib;->~~~ 1 .t.•:mr' l!l
.~~'d·~!{;fu5jfg-ariicst ~ :;, ~ ;:_ ·· .. Jft ... ~ ~ ·; 0:_',4!:. II
Chloride-----------A4500-Cl 1 mg!L 28 days
B or
~ --------E ~ orE30.0.0
Sulfate ~ ...-rill giL ~ r -----E300.0
Carbon~03 A2320 B 1 mg/L 14 days
~rbonate as HC03 A2320 B 1 mg!L 14 days
~VdaljletQ,t;g~t?JCOmlio:un.as~J:tJog9Je.th~!W.fogf~ !W· ~~ • .,, ~:~ "
Carbon Tetrachloride SW8260B 1.0)-Lg/L 14 days
or
SW8260C
Chloroform SW8260B 1.0 )lg!L 14 days
or
SW8260C
Dichloromethane SW8260B 1.0)-Lg/L 14 days
(Methylene Chloride) or
SW8260C
Chloromethane SW8260B 1.0 )lg!L 14 days
or
SW8260C
li~ll '' --~f ~ ·,--:~til ' -· ''il ~. , .
. : fl. rre;e~i ~ Ji'e ;; ... ~~~ ~ '" 1f -·'-~--· _, .,t,; ., -~)f':-
None ~ ~
None :S6°C
---------None ~
None -----'''l'ti;t:;'!o):~ '"' ~ .· -,j.-~ ;;\;:
HCl to pH<2 :::; 6°C
HCl to pH<2 , :::; 6°C
HCl to pH<2 :::; 6°C
HCl to pH<2 $_6°C
~0®s~~-1:~iig.S~:iibli!udm~}lf:S~;Wf~h1y,~ ~<~!J! ~~1 ~~~ -"'f~.2jjo,.::~-~lf4 >i~~ ~¥."
1 ,2,~chlorobenzene SW8270D <10 ug;!L 7/40 days None <PC
1,2-Dichi~enzene SW8270D <10 ug!L 7/40 days None A6°C
1,3-Dichlorob~ne SW8270D <10 ug!L 7/40 days None / / :::; 6°C
1,4-Dichlorobenzen~ SW8270D <10 ug!L 7/40 days Nony < 6°C
1-Methy1naphthalene ~ SW8270D <10 l.1e/L 7/40 days Xone <6°C
2 4,5-Trichlorophenol ~8270D <10 ug!L 7/40 days /None <6°C
2,4,6-Trichloroghenol SWmQD <10 ug/L 7/40 davy None <6°C
2 4-Dichlorophenol SW8270:t}--. ,<10 ug!L_ 7/4Q-1fays None <6°C
2,4-Dimethylphenol SW8270D <~giL ..-'7740 days None < 6°C
2,4-Dinitrophenol SW8270D <20u~-7/40 days None < 6°C
2,4-Dinitrotoluene SW8270D <)B"Ug!L ~40 days None <6°C
2,6-Dinitrotoluene SW8270D/ ....--<10 ug/L 7/4~ys None <6°C
2-Chloronaphthalene SW~D <10 ug!L 7/40 days-...._ None <6°C
2-Chlorophenol _sw"8270D <10 ug!L 7/40 days ~None <6°C
2-Me thy !naphthalene / SW8270D <10 ug/L 7/40 days ~e <6°C
2-MethylJ2henol / SW8270D <10 ug/L 7/40 days None ............ <6°C
2-Nitrophenol / SW8270D <10 ug!L 7/40 days None ~ <6°C
3&4-Meth~enol SW8270D <10 ug!L 7/40 days None ~6°C
3,3'-~orobenzidine SW8270D <10 u_g/L_ 7/40 day_? None < 6"'&_
~initro-2-methylphenol SW8270D <10 ug!L 7/40 days None <6°C ~
~
Analysis
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
N02&NQ3
O&G
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TP04
Procedure:
Frequency:
Preservation Check Sheet
s --le Set Ext'
Preservative I 2 J '( ) (b
pH<2 H2S04
pH<2 H2S04
pH>12
NaOH
pH<2HN03
pH <2 H:2S04 lv'cs lb IMS J;"S'" v'-.le~
pH<2HCL I I' II I I
pH<2H2S04
pH>9NaOH,
Zn Acetate
pH<2H2S04
pH<2 H2S04
-
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from Lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
7
l?f
I/
-doH
~ !j
l v~{ v~' 11'
lr\ It
lof-5' \£...~ v
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
If sample is not preserved, properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag COC, notify client if requested
Place client conversation on COC
Samples may be adjusted
All samples requiring preservation
*
+
....
#
•
The sample required additional preservative upon receipt.
The sample was received unpreserved
The Sample was received unpreserved and therefore preserved upon receipt.
The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH < 2 due to the sample matrix
The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH > __ due to the sample matrix interference
Lab Set ID: !3 0 11o3
/"J /3 I 'I J) !& /) /fj-ICf .t
L?~ ~_,. Vl':f r/~ lfc-s Ye5 I~ ~ Ut· / II I II I
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
!-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Garrin Palmer
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
TEL: [phone]
RE: 3rd Quarter Chloroform 2013
Dear Garrin Palmer: Lab Set ID: 1309255
American West Analytical Laboratories received 9 sample(s) on 9/13/2013 for the
analyses presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AWAL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) in Utah and Texas; and is
state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, and Missouri.
All analyses were performed in accordance to the NELAP protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation scope documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
Thank You, Ky I e F . Digitally signed by Kyle F. Gross
ON: cn=Kyle F. Gross, o=AWAL,
ou=AWAL-Laboratory Director,
G roSS
email=[e-mail], c=US
Date: 2013 09 2414:41:07 -06'00'
Approvedby: ~----------------------~
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 9/24/2013 Page I of 29
All anulyscs applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are pcrfonncd in accordanl:C to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the att.Jchcd COC, This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promo lion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
SAMPLE SUMMARY
American West Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
hU~!VTIC/\1 II> O~I.TO~ rv Project: 3rd Quarter Chloroform 2013
Lab Set ID: 1309255
Date Received: 9/13/2013 1015h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
463 West 3600 South
1309255-00lA TW4-29 09122013 9/12/2013 0657h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
)alt Lake City, UT 84115 1309255-00 1B TW4-29 09122013 9/12/2013 0657h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1309255-001 c TW4-29 09122013 9/12/2013 0657h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Phone: [phone] 1309255-002A TW4-21 09122013 9/12/2013 0711h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1309255-002B TW4-21 09122013 9/12/2013 0711h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Toll Free: [phone] 1309255-002C TW4-21 09122013 9/12/2013 0711h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Fax: [phone]C/5030C
~-mail: [e-mail] 1309255-003A TW4-10 09122013 9/12/2013 0723h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1309255-003B TW4-10 09122013 9/12/2013 0723h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
web: www.awal-labs.com 1309255-003C TW4-10_09122013 9/12/2013 0723h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1309255-004A TW4-11_09122013 9/12/2013 0747h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Kyle F. Gross 1309255-004B TW4-11 09122013 9/12/2013 0747h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1309255-004C TVV4-11_09122013 9/12/2013 0747h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Laboratory Director 8260C/5030C
1309255-005A TVV4-07 09122013 9/12/2013 0753h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Jose Rocha 1309255-005B TW4-07 09122013 9/12/2013 0753h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
QA Officer 1309255-005C TVV4-07_09122013 9/12/2013 0753h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1309255-006B TW4-01 09122013 9/12/2013 0800h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1309255-006C TVV4-01_09122013 9/12/2013 0800h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1309255-007 A TW4-02_09122013 9/12/2013 0807h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1309255-007B TW4-02 09122013 9/12/2013 0807h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1309255-007C TW4-02 09122013 9/12/2013 0807h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1309255-008A TW4-60 09122013 9/12/2013 0845h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1309255-008B TW4-60_ 09122013 9/12/2013 0845h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1309255-008C TVV4-60 09122013 9/12/2013 0845h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1309255-009A Trip Blank 9/12/2013 Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Report Date: 9/24/2013 Page 2 of 29
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC This report is provided for the exclusive use or the addressee Privileges of
subsequent usc oft he name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of tl1is rcp011 in connection with the odvcrtiscmcnt, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Inorganic Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
Project:
Lab SetiD:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
3rd Quarter Chloroform 2013
1309255
9/13/2013
9112/2013
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation of all
samples were performed within the method holding times. All samples were properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD:
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, with the
following exceptions: The MS and MSD percent recoveries for nitrate/nitrite were
outside of control limits on sample 1309255-005B due to sample matrix
interference.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 9/24/2013 Page 3 of 29
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, nnd RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on 1hc attached COC This report is p1ovided for the exclusive usc of the addressee Privileges of
subscqllcnt use of the name of this company or any member of its staft~ orrcproduction oftl1is repm1 in connection with the ::Jdvcrtiscmcnt, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report fo1 any
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1309255
Project: 3rd Quarter Chloroform 2013
Analyte Result
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
Units
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
_Q~ SUMMARY_REf_QRT
Method MDL
Reporting
Limit
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
QC Type: LCS
Amount
Spiked
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
Lab Sample ID: LCS-RS9272 Date Analyzed: 09/18/2013 1211h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.50 mg/L E300.0 0.0114 0.100 5.000 0 90.1
Lab Sample ID: LCS-RS9208 Date Analyzed: 09/17/2013 2038h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.02 mg/L E353.2 0.00252 0.100 1.000 0 102
Limits
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 9/24/2013 Page 22 of29
! analyses applicable to the CWA, SOWA, and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnation is Jocatcd on the attached COC This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mbcr of its staff. or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any p1oduct or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be g1antcd only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Lab Set ID: 1309255
Project: 3rd Quarter Chloroform 2013
Analyte Result Units Method
Lab Sample ID: MB-R59272 Date Analyzed: 09/18/2013 1148h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride < 0.100 mg/L E300.0
Lab Sample ID: MB-R59208 Date Analyzed: 09/17/2013 2037h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) <0.100 mg/L E353.2
MDL
0.0114
0.00252
Reporting
Limit
0.100
0.100
Dept: we
QC Type: MBLK
Amount
Spiked
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 9/24/2013 Page 23 of 29
i analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC pi otocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee, Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
rnbcr of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any p1oduct or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1309255
Project: 3rd Quarter Chloroform 2013
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: 1309253-001AMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 467
Lab Sample ID: 1309255-00SAMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.83
Lab Sample ID: 1309253-001BMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.36
Lab Sample ID: 1309255-005BMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 16.2
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Units Method
09/18/2013 1802h
mg/L E300.0 -09/18/2013 224lh
mg/L E300.0
09/17/2013 2045h
mg/L E353.2 -09/17/2013 2117h
mg/L E353.2
MDL
1.14
0.0114
0.00252
0.0252
Reporting
Limit
10.0
0.100
0.100
1.00
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Amount
Spiked
500.0
5.000
1.000
10.00
Garrin Palmer
we
MS
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
7.94 91.8
0.029 96.0
0.413 94.8
4.17 120
1 -Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix inteiference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
Limits
90-110
90-110
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 9/24/2013 Page 24 of29
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols1 Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mbcr of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
American West QC SUMMARY REPORT ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact:
Lab Set ID: 1309255 Dept:
Project: 3rd Quarter Chloroform 2013 QC Type:
Reporting Amount
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Spiked
Lab Sample ID: 1309253-00IAMSD Date Analyzed: 09/18/2013 1825h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 459 mg/L E300.0 1.14 10.0 500.0 -Lab Sample ID: 1309255-00SAMSD Date Analyzed: 09/18/2013 2304h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.86 mg/L E300.0 0.0114 0.100 5.000 -Lab Sample ID: 1309253-00IBMSD Date Analyzed: 09/1712013 2047h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.31 mg/L E353.2 0.00252 0.100 1.000
Lab Sample ID: 1309255-005BMSD Date Analyzed: 09/17/2013 2118h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 15.6 mg/L E353.2 0.0252 1.00 10.00
§-QC limits are set with an accuracy of two significant figures, therefore the recovery rounds to an acceptable value within the control limits.
1 -Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
Garrin Palmer
we
MSD
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
7.94 90.2
0.029 96.6
0.413 89.7
4.17 115
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Limits Amt %RPD Limit Qual
90-110 467 1.73 20
90-110 4.83 0.660 20
90-110 1.36 3.77 10 §
90-110 16.2 3.32 10
Report Date: 9/24/2013 Page 25 of29
l analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in acco1dancc to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee, Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mbcr of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any p1oduet or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1309255
Project: 3rd Quarter Chloroform 2013
Analyte Result
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Units Method MDL
Reporting
Limit
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: LCS
Amount
Spiked
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
Lab Sample ID: LCS VOA 0916138 DateAnalyzed: 09/16/2013 1904h
Test Code: B260-W
Chloroform
Methylene chloride
Surr: 1 ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-dB
Lab Sample ID: LCS VOA 091713A
Test Code: B260-W
Chloroform
Methylene chloride
Surr: I ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-dB
20.2 1-Lg/L SWB260C
17.9 1-!g/L SWB260C
53.5 I! giL SW8260C
47.8 1-Lg/L SW8260C
51.9 1-Lg/L SW8260C
48.6 1-Lg/L SWB260C
Date Analyzed: 09/17/2013 1057h
21.1 1-Lg/L SWB260C
IB.4 1-!g/L SWB260C
53.6 ~-Lg/L SWB260C
4B.2 I! giL SW8260C
5l.B I! giL SWB260C
4B.6 1-Lg/L SWB260C
0.277 2.00 20.00 0 101
0.155 2.00 20.00 0 B9.3
50.00 107
50.00 95.5
50.00 104
50.00 97.3
0.277 2.00 20.00 0 106
0.155 2.00 20.00 0 91.9
50.00 107
50.00 96.5
50.00 104
50.00 97.1
Limits
67-132
32-IB5
76-13B
77-121
67-128
81 -135
67-132
32-1B5
76-13B
77-121
67-128
81-135
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 9/24/2013 Page 26 of29
analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampUng infonnation is located on the attached COC This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mbcr of its staff, or reproduction oflhis rcp01t in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1309255
Project: 3rd Quarter Chloroform 2013
Analyte
Lab Sample ID: MB VOA 091613B
Test Code: 8260-W
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Surr: I ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
Lab Sample ID: MB VOA 091713A
Test Code: 8260-W
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Surr: 1 ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
Result
Date Analyzed:
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
55.5
52.5
51.5
50.3
Date Analyzed:
<2.00
<2.00
< 3.00
<2.00
56.2
52.6
52.7
51.6
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Units Method MDL
09/16/2013 1941h
J.lg/L SW8260C 0.137
J.lg/L SW8260C 0.277
J.!g/L SW8260C 0.127
J.!g/L SW8260C 0.155
J.lg/L SW8260C
J.!g/L SW8260C
J.lg/L SW8260C
J.lg/L SW8260C
09/17/2013 1134h
J.!g/L SW8260C 0.137
j.!g/L SW8260C 0.277
J.!g/L SW8260C 0.127
J.lg/L SW8260C 0.155
J.!g/L SW8260C
J.!g/L SW8260C
J.!g/L SW8260C
J.!g/L SW8260C
Reporting
Limit
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
2.00
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MBLK
Amount
Spiked
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
111
105
103
101
112
105
105
103
Limits
76-138
77-121
67-128
81-135
76-138
77-121
67-128
81 -135
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 9/24/2013 Page 27 of29
analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC, This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee, Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mbcr of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on conlactl This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANALYTICAL LABO~ATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1309255
Project: 3rd Quarter Chloroform 2013
Analyte
Lab Sample ID: 1309253-00ICMS
Test Code: 8260-W
Chloroform
Methylene chloride
Surr: I ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
Lab Sample ID: 1309255-00ICMS
Test Code: 8260-W
Chloroform
Methylene chloride
Surr: I ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibrornofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
Result
Date Analyzed:
18.4
16.0
56.3
47.6
52.8
48.8
Date Analyzed:
19.7
17.1
55.7
49.7
53.3
49.4
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Units Method
09/17/2013 0017h
~giL SW8260C
~g/L SW8260C
~giL SW8260C
~giL SW8260C
~giL SW8260C
~giL SW8260C -09/17/2013 0054h
~giL SW8260C
~giL SW8260C
~giL SW8260C
~giL SW8260C
~giL SW8260C
~giL SW8260C
MDL
0.277
0.155
0.277
0.155
Reporting
Limit
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MS
Amount
Spiked
20.00
20.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
20.00
20.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
Spike Ref.
Amount
0
0
0
0
%REC
92.2
80.2
113
95.3
106
97.7
98.4
85.6
Ill
99.4
107
98.8
Limits
50-146
30-192
72-151
80-128
80-124
77-129
50-146
30-192
72-151
80-128
80-124
77-129
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 9/24/2013 Page 28 of29
~analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
rnbcr of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1309255
Project: 3rd Quarter Chloroform 2013
Analyte Result
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Q{: SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Units Method MDL
Reporting
Limit
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MSD
Amount
Spiked
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
Lab Sample ID: 1309253-00ICMSD Date Analyzed: 09/17/2013 0036h
Test Code: 8260-W
Chloroform
Methylene chloride
Surr: I ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
Lab Sample ID: 1309255-00ICMSD
Test Code: 8260-W
Chloroform
Methylene chloride
Surr: I ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
17.1
15.2
55.8
47.8
52.7
48.7
Date Analyzed:
21.0
18.2
56.3
49.2
52.6
48.6
Jl.g/L SW8260C 0.277 2.00 20.00 0 85.7
Jl.g/L SW8260C 0.155 2.00 20.00 0 75.8
Jl.g/L SW8260C 50.00 112
Jl.g/L SW8260C 50.00 95.7
Jl.g/L SW8260C 50.00 105
Jl.g/L SW8260C 50.00 97.3
09/1712013 0113h
Jl.g/L SW8260C 0.277 2.00 20.00 0 105
Jl.g/L SW8260C 0.155 2.00 20.00 0 90.9
Jl.g/L SW8260C 50.00 113
Jl.g/L SW8260C 50.00 98.3
Jl.g/L SW8260C 50.00 105
Jl.g/L SW8260C 50.00 97.1
Limits
50-146
30-192
72-!51
80-128
80-124
77-129
50-146
30-192
72-!51
80-128
80-124
77-129
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QAOfficer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
18.4 7.37 25
16 5.58 25
19.7 6.44 25
17.1 6.06 25
Report Date: 9/24/2013 Page 29 of 29
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance.; to NELAC p1otocols. Pertinent sampJing infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee Privileges of subsequent usc oftl1c name of this company or any
mbcr of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advc1tiscmcnt, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be gnmtcd only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West Analytical Laboratories UL
Denison
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1309255 Page 1 of2
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 9/24/2013
Client m:· ·-·nENTOO Contact: Garrin Pahner
Project: 3rd Quarter Chloroform 2013 QC Level: III WO Type: Project
Comments: PA Rush. QC 3 (Sununary/No chromatograms). RL of 1 ppm for Chloride and VOC and 0.1 ppm for N02/N03. Expected levels provided by client-see
Jenn. J-flag what we can't meet. ElM Locus and EDD-Denison. Email Group.; D*)
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
13 09255-00 lA TW4-29 _09122013 9/12/2013 0657h 9113/2013 10 15h 300.0-W Aqueous IJI df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1309255-001B N02/N03-W-353.2 JJl df-no2/no3
1 SELAnalytes: N03N02N
1309255-001C 8260-W hi! VOCFridge
Test Gr.oup: 8260-W-Custom; #of A11a/ytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1309255-002A 1LVV4-21_09122013 9/1212013 0711h 9/13/2013 101Sh 300.0-W Aqueous IJI df-wc
1 SEL A11aly_te.s: CL
1309255-002B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1309255-002C 8260-W 0 VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I # ofSurr: 4
1309255-003A TW4-10_09122013 9/12/2013 0723h 9/13/2013 101Sh 300.0-W Aqueous Vl df-wc
1 SELAnalyies: CL
1309255-003B N02/N03-W-353.2 VI df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analyte.s: N03N02N
1309255-003C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I # of Surr: 4
1309255-004A TW4-11_09122013 9112/2013 074 7h 9/13/2013 10 15h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL A11alytes: CL
1309255-004B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analyles: N03N02N
1309255-004C 8260-W 21 VOCFridge :3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I # ofSurr: 4
1309255-00SA TW4-07_09122013 9/1212013 0753h 9/13/2013 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SEL Anafyte.)'.' CL
1309255-005B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analyte~ N03N02N
1309255-005C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I # ofSurr: 4
1309255-006A 11YV4-0l 09122013 9/12/2013 0800h 9113/2013 101 Sh Aqueous 0 Cl not received
1309255-006B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analyte.'l: N03N02N
Printed: 9/13/2013 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M £e' RT {U"' CN Q>' TAT ~ QC r:J HOK __ HOK __ HOK __ coc EmAIIP.d.1\.fl-.. q'll dJ I ~
WORK ORDER Summary WorkOrder: 1309255 Page 2 of2
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 9/24/2013
SampleiD Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1309255::00"6C" .. -. -TW<I=OI_:09122013 9/12/2013 0800h 9/13/2013" 1015h 82()0~W Aqueous ~] VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# of Surr: 4
1309255-007A TW4-02_09122013 9/12/2013 0807h 9/13/2013 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous IJj df-wc
I SEL Analytes: CL
1309255-0078 N02!N03-W-3S3.2 IJl df-no2/no3
I SELAIUI/y~s: N03N02N
1309255-007C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1309255-00SA TW4-60_ 09122013 9/12/2013 0845h 9/13/2013 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous 0 ' df-wc
1 SEL Antii)ltes: CL
1309255-0088 N02/N03-W-3S3.2 0 df-no2/no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1309255-00SC 8260-W li?l VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# of Surr: 4
1309255-009A Trip Blank 9/12/2013 9/13/2013 1015h 8260-W Aqueous ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# of Surr: 4
Printed: 9/13/2013 FOR LAB ORA TORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1): %M 0 RT 0 CN 0 TAT 0 QCO HOK __ _ HOK __ _ HOK___ COC Emailed,__ ___ _
AMERICAN WEST
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 W. 3600 S. SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84115
PHONE # [phone] TOLL FREE # [phone]
~ F~. (00') 263--EM~C AW~@AW~-c~=o•
WWW .AWAL.-L.ABS.COM . --~------
CLIENT: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
ADDRESS: 6425 S. Hwy. 191
Blanding, UT 84511
CONTACT! Garrin Palmer
PHONE#: [phone] CELL#:
[e-mail]; [e-mail];
EMAIL: dtlu!@ener&lfuels.com
PROJECT NAME! 3rd Quarter Chloroform 2013
PROJECT#:
PO#:
SAMPLER NAME: Tanner Holliday, Garrin Palmer
DATE TIME
J
SAMPLE ID: SAMPLED SAMPLED
TW4-29_09122013 9/12/2013 657
t 'l'W4-21_09122013 9/12/2013 711
l 'l'W4-10_09122013 9/12/2013 723
I TW4-11_09122013 9/12/2013 747
; TW4-07_09122013 9/12/2013 753
TW4-01_09122013 9/12/2013 800
' TW4-02_09122013 9/12/2013 807
I TW4-60_09122013 9/12/2013 845
> TRIPBLAKK 9/12/2013
~ TEMPBLANK 9/12/2013
I
~
:i
RELINQUISHED BY: J.l.~ p.ATeo R!!CE!I;~ SIGNATURe .::I t.UtJt..uc.. q/IZ/13 S!ONAT
-r;_nnc.r l-lol\;J"~ TIME: ~NAMI!! PRINT NAMe: 11 ~0
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
AU ANALYSIS WIU. BE C:ONDUCTED USING NELAP ACCREDrT~D METHODS AND AU. DATA WILL BE REPORTeD U$INGI
AWAL's STANDARD ANALYTe USTS AND RBPORTING LIMITS (PQL) UNLBSS SP!!CIPICALLY RII!QUI!STI!D OTHERWIS!! ON THIS
CHAIN OP CUSTODY AND/OR ATTACHED DOCUMENTATION
QC LBVBL:
I
TURN AROUND TIMB: UNU!S& OTHER ARRANGII!MEN'TS HAVE
BEEN MADE, SIGNED REPORTS WILL Bl!
3 STANDARD BMAIL.I!D BY 5:00 PM ON THE DAY
• _:J:tU:!Y_.ARE_D:UI!. _ _ __ .... ·----
X INCLUDE EDD:
LOCUS UPLOAD
EXCEL
FIELD FILTERED FoR:
I
I
FOR COMPLIANCB WITH:
D NELAP
D RCRA
D CWA
0 SDWA
D EL.AP I A2L.A
0 NLLAP
Ill c;o 0' D NoN-COMPLIANCE a: c) "' X (;j 0 D OTHER: z 0: 0') D' ~ ,_ <:2. ... 0 z ~ (') 0 10
0 0 0 ~ u IU 12: 0 KNOWN HAZARDS ..J II) .. ...... ::t ,. & IL ~ N t) 0 0 0 0 .. en !;!: > SAMPLE CoMMENTs
5 w X X X
5 w X X X
5 w X X X
5 w X X X
5 w X X X
5 w X ~ X " ~~e.r.J"~ -.ne'l{J3t
5 w X X X
5 w X X X
3 w X
DATE!: SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
TiME:
\~ffi~s-
A W AI-I..As SAMPLE SET #
PAGE 1 OF t"' _:_·,._= __ . I
LABORATORY UsE ONLY
SAMPLES WEREo (:eA.~
1 8' OR HAND DELIV.RED
2 AMBII!IlTO~
3 TI!MPERATURE ~ oc
4 ReceiVeD BROKEN/LEAKING
(IMPROPeRLY S~
y N -
S o:-y PRose~VED
C -0 AT BBNCH
y N
6 RecBrvl!o WrrHlN
6oiOTIMBS N
I COC TAP!!: WAS:
I eJI}jT ON OunR PACKAGe
Y N NA
2 ~OUt' ON OUTOR PAcKAae
Y N NA
~ 3 ~Resemo~~~ I
4 UNBROKeN ON 5:...0[0
Y N NA
. .
OISCRE!PANCIES BETWEBN SAMPL.Z
LABB';; AND COC c:?'7
I
Ret.JNQUISHED av: '-.) 0Anti 7 RecEIVED av: DATE: See the Analytical Scope of Work for Reporting Limits and
SIGNATURE SIGNATURE VOC analyte list.
7 t'IME!:
PRINT NAM~ PRINT NAM!!:
Rlll.lllq~avo / PATE: R!!CEIVE!D BY: DATE:
s Jill" .. w:l'l' SJGINATURE
/ TIME: TIME=
PRf:fn" NAMI!I: PRINT N ..... ,
Rel.ltiau"I"'.D n: / PATE!: =~:: .. :s.·~ AJ\• I J) (J .. ~}r 1 I lJ.. ::J o ... ,..,9 ll~~ \-~ .SIGINATURE
/ TiME: Po-. 01:-r:sf'!>··.ll\.~sP ~l 1 VL '{\ n._.e! ~~~~I~ PouNT NAMJI; I -
....
A W AL -Analytical Scope of Work
White Mesa Mill Blanding Utah
Page11of13
Confai:hU;t.?nt . .. ·:~-:1 ,.. .~Y~r ~aJ J~~PP.rt~o~. ~ .......... .. ,._
' I ~ "-'>-t -f , I • _,
1 ,~, ' ... ' .•' ,}\tle~o~ .· -~~ · -"' ' . . --~ ' oe.t}·&f -,. ~ -. . ...... 1:0·. . s , ,: -..":< I I:;··~ ~ -· "----~~ ... •', ., ,~ .. ~ .,_ . -•". ~--' ~
~:fuox~::mi,cs; · rr.·;·· • '[' y ••• ~ . -Chloride~ A4500-Cl I mg/L
8 or
~ ~ or £300.0
Sulfate ~ -tmgiL
r ------£300.0
Carbm~03 A2320 B 1 mg/L
~bonate as HC03 A2320 B 1 mg/L
VolatileGtgan:iC''CbmpQ'und$~-CJHof6:fOrru Program,.
Carbon Tetrachloride SW8260B 1.0 llgiL
or
SW8260C
Chloroform SW8260B 1.01-lg/L
or
SW8260C
Dichloromethane SW8260B 1.0 llg/L
(Methylene Chloride) or
SW8260C
Chloromethane SW8260B 1.0 llgiL
or
SW8260C
~ocs:c-:-Taili11gsJmboun:&ne:nt sam'p'lef 0hly' ~
1;2.~chlorobenzene SW8270D <10 ug/L
1 ,2-Dichl~enzene SW8270D <10 ug!L
1,3-Dichlorob~ne SW8270D <10 ug/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzen~ SW8270D <10 ug!L
1-Methy1naphthalene ~ SW8270D <10 ug/L
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol ~8270D <10 ug/L
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol SW~D <10 ug/L
2,4-Dichloropheno1 SW8270D'--<10 ug/L
11J\r{axim:u m . ·-~~e -·.: ~~· .. 1 • ~-• awp l'i .· ·. t:5Jdl~g:; ~-· -P'rtiervaii.on ·-·' • "/< }o l ~L~fietattiJe.·
rchries ~~ iRequir~~n~ · 1~·Re(tuj1;em~nu • : ··,. --~:r;-, ,, ': -· j . . -. ,__ . --;?.,· ·; _!.... . . ., ,. ';, ":"; ..
28 days None ~ ~ ~
2~ None ::; 6°C
--------14 days None ~
14 days None ---.. , I ·.
14 days HCl to pH<2 ~6°C
14 days HCl to pH<2 ::;6°C
14 days HCI to pH<2 ::;6°C
14 days HCI to pH<2 S 6°C
'
. -,., ,__. ~;_.,:~· . . .-4'
7/40 days None <IX!
7/40 days None A6°C
7/40 d&YS None / v <6°C
7/40 days Nony <6°C I
7/40 days __.N6'ne <6"C
7/40 days VNone <6°C
7/40da~ None <6°C
7 I 4.01[a.ys None <6°C
2 4-Dimethylphenol SW8270D <fe..ug/L f--1/40 day_s None <6°C
2,4-Dinitrophenol SW8270D <20u~ 7/40 days None <6°C
2,4-Dinitrotoluene SW8270D <.JZllg!L · N,l40 days None <6°C
2,6-Dinitrotoluene SW8270D/ v<lO ug/L 7/41N.ays None <6°C '
2-Chloronaphthalene swsyroo <10 ug/L 7/40 da~ None $6°C I
2-Chlorophenol #8270D <10 ug/L 7/40 days "'-.... None <6°C [
2-Me thy !naphthalene / SW8270D <10 ug/L 7/40 days ~e < 6°C I I
2-Methylphenol / SW8270D <10 ug/L 7/40 days Non~ <6°C ;
2-Nitrophenol / SW8270D <10 ug!L 7/40 days None ......... <6°C
3&4-Meth~enol SW8270D <10 ug/L 7/40 days None ~6°C
3,3 '-~lorobenzidine SW8270D <10 ug/L 7/40 days None <~ :
~initro-2-methylphenol SW8270D <10 u,e,/L 7/40 days None <6°C ~
---
Analysis
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
N02 &N03
O&G
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TP04
Procedure:
Frequency:
Preservation Check Sheet
s
Preservative ~oc\ ·-002..--((\=3 -OC'Jt) -ocs -ecy,
pH<2 H2S04
pH<2~S04
pH>12
NaOH
pH<2HN03
pH<2 H2S04 :-Je0 1\/ f.?:;, I \fee:. \Je'""> \Je~ I'./ f' s
pH<2HCL { ' I I I ,
pH <2H2S04
pH>9NaOH,
ZnAcetate
pH<2H2S04
pH<2H2S04
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from Lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
~ccif -("(':Y5
"-eS ve~ , I
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
If sample is not preserved, properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag COC, notify client if requested
Place client conversation on COC
Samples may be adjusted
All samples requiring preservation
*
+
•
#
•
The sample required additional preservative upon receipt.
The sample was received unpreserved
The Sample was received unpreserved and therefore preserved upon receipt .
The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH < 2 due to the sample matrix
The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH > __ due to the sample matrix interference
Lab SetiD: i '30C!Z~:i)
TabH
Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
H-1 Field Data QAIQC Evaluation
Volume
Locatiop 2x Casiog Volume Pumped Yolrune Check
Piezometer 1 -
Piezometer 2 -
Piezometer 3 -
TWN-1 36.62 73.24 90.00 OK
TWN.a NA Cominuously Pltmpl!d Wull
TWN~3 3'8,0'9 76.1S 49.50 Pumped Dry
TWN-4 50.34 100.68 132.00 OK
TWN-:7· 11 .72 23.44 14.00-Pumped Dry
TWN-18 56.38 112.76 132.00 OK
TW4~21 NA C<11.ntlnu_pusl¥ pumpl!d well
TW-4-2-4 NA Cominuously pumped we ll
TW4-2j NA Conriuuousl,y pumpe.d w~ll
NC =Not Calculated
RPD = Relative Percent Difference
TWN-.2 . TW4-22, TW4-24~ and TW4-25 are eo.ntinuou.ly pumping well .
Piezometers 1, 2, and 3 were not pumped, only one set of puramete were taken.
'TWN-3 and TWN-7 were pum'ped dry. and sarnpl~d aftc'r J:ccovery.
ConducfhitS! ll RPD pH·
2215 NC 9.40
689 NC 7.76
3136.0 NC 12.08
890.0 895.0 0.56 7.23 7.23
2847 _N_C 6$7
2492.0 2?1.8.6.0 0.24 7.17 7..15
1054.0 1054.0 0.00 7.16 7.16
l-225.0 12.30.0 0.41 7.02 7.15
2228.0 2232.0 0.18 6.94 6.93
6097 NC 6.94
8247 NC 6.73
289.5 NC 7.27
1\1
MD Temp RPD R~ox.P'otentihl RPl> Turbidity RPD
NC 15.32 NC 332 NC 13 NC
NC 14.59 NC 315 NC 3.1 NC
NC 14.46 NC 260 NC 12 NC
0.00 15.12 15.12 0.00 270 I 271 0.37 44 I 44 0.00
.NC 17.29 NC 216 NC () NC
0.28 14.79 14.73 0.41 NM NC NM NC
0.00 14.79 14.79 0.00 246 I 246 0.00 84.0 I 84.0 0.00
1.83 15.94 15.99 0.31 NM NC NM NC
0.14 14.64 14.64 0.00 274 I 274 0.00 237:0 I 260.0 1.16
NC 17.10 NC 254 NC 0.5 NC
.NC 17.11 N€ 254 NC _Q_ NC
NC 16.97 NC 275 NC 0.8 Nt
T.he ·QAP state. U1at t\lrbidity hould be-Jess than 5 NephelomeLcic Turbid ity Units· ("NTU' pri r to amp1ing unl~ th~ well i . characterize(! by water that tl.as a higher turbidily. The AP do • notre uire that turbidi ty measurements be 1e than 5 NTtJ. prior lO ampling.
A$ u·eh, tll(} noted . t?.sertv:uiQn, 1'C_gll(d iog rurbidity mcru u~mcnts Jc.<> than 5 NTU below are included for int rmation purposes onLy.
NM = Not Measured. The QAP does not require the measurement of redox potential or turbidity in wells that were purged to dryness.
H-2: Holding Time Evaluation
Hold Time Allowed Hold Hold Time
Location ID Parameter Name Sample Date Analysis Date (Davs) Time (Davs) Check
PIEZ-01 Chloride 8/28/2013 9/10/2013 13 28 OK
PIEZ-01 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 8/28/2013 9/6/2013 9 28 OK
PIEZ-02 Chloride 8/28/2013 9110/2013 13 28 OK
PIEZ-02 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 8/28/2013 9/6/2013 9 28 OK
PIEZ-03 Chloride 8/28/2013 9/10/2013 13 28 OK
PIEZ-03 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 8/28/2013 9/6/2013 9 28 OK
TWN-01 Chloride 8/27/2013 9/4/2013 8 28 OK
TWN-01 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 8/27/2013 9/6/2013 10 28 OK
TWN-01R Chloride 8/27/2013 9/4/2013 8 28 OK
TWN-OlR Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 8/27/2013 9/6/2013 10 28 OK
TWN-02 Chloride 8/27/2013 9/4/2013 8 28 OK
TWN-02 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 8/27/2013 9/6/2013 10 28 OK
TWN-03 Chloride 8/28/2013 9/4/2013 7 28 OK
TWN-03 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 8/28/2013 9/6/2013 9 28 OK
TWN-04 Chloride 8/27/2013 9/4/2013 8 28 OK
TWN-04 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 8/27/2013 9/6/2013 10 28 OK
TWN-07 Chloride 8/28/2013 9/4/2013 7 28 OK
TWN-07 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 8/28/2013 9/6/2013 9 28 OK
TWN-18 Chloride 8/27/2013 9/4/2013 8 28 OK
TWN-18 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 8/27/2013 9/6/2013 10 28 OK
TW4-22 Chloride 9/3/2013 9/12/2013 9 28 OK
TW4-22 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 9/3/2013 9112/2013 9 28 OK
TW4-24 Chloride 9/3/2013 9/12/2013 9 28 OK
TW4-24 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 9/3/2013 9112/2013 9 28 OK
TW4-25 Chloride 9/3/2013 9112/2013 9 28 OK
TW4-25 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 9/3/2013 9/12/2013 9 28 OK
TWN-60 Chloride 8/27/2013 9/5/2013 9 28 OK
TWN-60 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 8/27/2013 9/6/2013 10 28 OK
TW4-60 Chloride 9/12/2013 9118/2013 6 28 OK
TW4-60 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 9112/2013 9117/2013 5 28 OK
TWN-65 Chloride 8/27/2013 9/4/2013 8 28 OK
TWN-65 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 8/27/2013 9/6/2013 10 28 OK
H-3: Analytical Method Check
Parameter ~fethod Me.thod l!Js~d by Lab
Nitrate E353.1 or E353.2 E353.2
A4500-Cl B or A4500-Cl E
Chloride orE300.0 E300.0
Both Nitrate and Chloride were analyzed with the correct analytical method.
-· cporung 1m1t ec H 4 R L' . Ch k
Required
Lab Reporting Reporting
Location Analyte Limit Units Qualifier Limit Units RLCheck
PIEZ-01 Chloride 10 mg/L I mg/L OK
PIEZ-01 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK
PIEZ-02 Chloride 5 mg/L 1 mg/L OK
PIEZ-02 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK
PIEZ-03 Chloride 5 mg/L 1 mg/L OK
PIEZ-03 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK
TWN-01 Chloride 5 mg/L 1 mg/L OK
TWN-01 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK
TWN-01R Chloride I mg/L u I mg/L OK
TWN-01R Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L u 0.1 mg/L OK
TWN-02 Chloride 10 mg/L 1 mg/L OK
TWN-02 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK
TWN-03 Chloride 50 mg/L 1 mg/L OK
TWN-03 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK
TWN-04 Chloride 5 mg/L I mg/L OK
TWN-04 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK
TWN-07 Chloride 1 mg/L 1 mg/L OK
TWN-07 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK
TWN-18 Chloride 10 mg/L 1 mg/L OK
TWN-18 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK
TW4-22 Chloride 100 mg/L 1 mg/L OK
TW4-22 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK
TW4-24 Chloride 100 mg/L 1 mg_IL OK
TW4-24 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK
TW4-25 Chloride 50 mg/L 1 mg/L OK
TW4-25 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK
TWN-60 Chloride 1 mg!L u 1 mg/L OK
TWN-60 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L u 0.1 mg/L OK
TW4-60 Chloride 1 mg/L u 1 mg/L OK
TW4-60 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L u 0.1 mg/L OK
TWN-65 Chloride 5 mg/L 1 mg/L OK
TWN-65 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg_/L OK
U = Value was reported by the laboratory as nondetect.
H-5 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
Cons'tituent TW!N-04 'fWN-65 ~ o/QRPD
Chloride 27.2 29 6.41
Nitrogen 1.58 1.57 0.63
RPD = Relative Percent Difference
H-6 QC Control Limits for Analysis and Blanks
Method Blank Detections
All Method Blanks for the quarter were non-detect.
Matrix Soike % Reoove-rv C -·-·r~ . ·-.-r--
REC
Lab ReiJort Lab Sample ID Well Analyte MS %REC MSD %REC Range RPD
1308556 1308556-005BMS TWN-18 Nitrate 133 122 90-110 7.27
~---- ---
Laboratory Control Sample
All Laboratory Control Samples were within acceptance limits for the quarter.
H7R . T E I -cce tpt empcr:ature va uauon
,$ampJe. Batc:b Wells in Baldi 'FeD1perature.
1308556 Piezometer 1, Piezometer 2, Piezometer 3, TWN-1, TWN-2, 0.8 ·c TWN-3, TWN-4, TWN-7, TWN-18, TWN-60, TWN-65
1309103 TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25 3.9 ·c
1309255 TW4-60 2.6 ·c
H-8 Rinsate Evaluation
All Rinsate and DI Blank samples were non-detect for the quarter.
Rinsate and DI Blank samples are shown on Table 1 and the
analytical data are included in Tab G.
Tab I
Kriged Current Quarter Isoconcentration Maps
MW-4
.4.9
TW4-1
0 7.1
TWN-1
<>1.2
PIEZ-1
~ 7.8
TW4-32
~NS
kriged nitrate isocon and label
kriged nitrate isocon and label
(extent uncertain)
perched monitoring well showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched monitoring well
showing concentration in mg/L
temporary perched nitrate monitoring
well showing concentration in mg/L
perched piezometer showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched monitoring well
installed September, 2013 (not sampled)
NOTE: MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19, and TW4-20 are chloroform pumping wells; TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 are nitrate pumping wells
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
KRIGED 3rd QUARTER, 2013 NITRATE (mg/L)
(NITRATE + NITRITE AS N)
APPROVED DATE
WHITE MESA SITE
REFERENCE
H:l718000/nov13/nitrate/Unt0913.srf
FIGURE I _1
NS = not sampled; ND = not detected
......_ 100 kriged chloride isocon and label
MW-4
.41
TW4-1
0 38
TWN-1
0 24
PIEZ-1
Q 55
TW4·32
3:( NS
perched monitoring well showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched monitoring well
showing concentration in mg/L
temporary perched nitrate monitoring
well showing concentration in mg/L
perched piezometer showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched monitoring well
installed September, 2013 (not sampled)
NOTE: MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19, and TW4-20 are chloroform pumping wells; TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 are nitrate pumping wells
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
KRIGED 3rd QUARTER, 2013 CHLORIDE (mg/L)
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE REFERENCE FIGURE
H fl18000/nov13/chloride/Ucl0913.srf I-2
TabJ
Analyte Concentrations Over Time
TWN-1
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/6/2009 0.7 19
7/21/2009 0.4 17
9/21/2009 0.4 19
10/28/2009 0.5 18
3/17/2010 0.5 17
5/26/2010 0.6 20
9/27/2010 0.6 19
12/7/2010 0.6 14
1/26/2011 0.5 17
4/20/2011 0.5 19
7/26/2011 0.5 14
10/17/2011 0.5 10
1/9/2012 0.6 15
4/18/2012 0.6 17
7/24/2012 0.6 17
10/15/2012 0.432 17.5
2/18/2013 0.681 17.6
4/23/2013 0.84 17.4
8/27/2013 1.24 24.1
TWN-2
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/6/2009 25.4 29
7/21/2009 25 25
9/21/2009 22.6 17
11/2/2009 20.8 55
3/24/2010 62.1 85
6/2/2010 69 97
9/29/2010 69 104
12/9/2010 48 93
2/1/2011 43 93
4/28/2011 40 85
7/28/2011 33 74
10/20/2011 33 76
1/12/2012 31 86
4/20/2012 48 103
7/31/2012 54 93
10/17/2012 22.1 79
2/19/2013 57.3 80.5
4/24/2013 57.7 82.1
8/27/2013 80 75.9
TWN-3
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/6/2009 23.6 96
7/21/2009 25.3 96
9/21/2009 27.1 99
11/2/2009 29 106
3/25/2010 25.3 111
6/3/2010 26 118
7/15/2010 27 106
12/10/2010 24 117
2/1/2011 24 138
4/28/2011 26 128
7/29/2011 25 134
10/20/2011 25 129
1/12/2012 25 143
4/20/2012 24 152
7/31/2012 27 158
10/17/2012 12.1 149
2/19/2013 22.2 157
4/24/2013 27.2 158
8/28/2013 20.9 171
TWN-4
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/6/2009 1 13
7/21/2009 0.05 12
9/21/2009 0.4 13
10/28/2009 0.4 11
3/16/2010 0.9 22
5/27/2010 1.0 22
9/27/2010 0.9 19
12/8/2010 1 21
1/25/2011 0.9 21
4/20/2011 0.9 21
7/26/2011 1.1 35
10/18/2011 0.9 20
1/9/2012 0.9 20
4/18/2012 1.1 24
7/25/2012 1.4 25
10/15/2012 1.45 26.4
2/18/2013 1.51 25.3
4/23/2013 1.63 24.4
8/27/2013 1.58 27.2
TWN-5
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
8/25/2009 0.22 42
9/21/2009 0.5 45
11/10/2009 0.2 48
3/16/2010 0.3 43
5/26/2010 0.3 44
7/12/2010 0.3 43
12/7/2010 0.3 45
1/25/2011 0.4 47
4/20/2011 0.3 44
7/26/2011 0.3 44
10/17/2011 0.3 45
1/9/2012 0.2 45
4/18/2012 0.3 39
7/24/2012 0.3 48
10/15/2012 0.1 43.5 Nitrate ND
TWN-6
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
8/25/2009 3.2 32
9/22/2009 1.6 13
11/3/2009 1.4 21
3/23/2010 1.5 19
6/1/2010 1.4 22
7/13/2010 1.4 73
12/8/2010 1.2 21
1/26/2011 1.1 18
4/20/2011 1.5 22
7/27/2011 1.1 17
10/18/2011 1.4 21
1/10/2012 1.2 20
4/18/2012 1.1 22
7/25/2012 1.4 22
10/15/2012 0.786 20.4
TWN-7
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
8/25/2009 ND 11
9/21/2009 ND 7
11/10/2009 0.1 7
3/17/2010 0.8 6
5/28/2010 1.2 6
7/14/2010 1.6 7
12/10/2010 1 4
1/27/2011 1.3 6
4/21/2011 1.7 6
7/29/2011 0.7 5
10/19/2011 2.2 6
1/11/2012 2.3 5
4/20/2012 1.2 6
7/26/2012 0.9 6
10/16/2012 0.641 5.67
2/19/2013 0.591 5.68
4/24/2013 1.16 5.88
8/28/2013 0.835 6.96
TWN-8
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1) Notes
8/25/2009 0 11 Nitrate is ND
9/21/2009 0 12 Nitrate is ND
11/10/2009 0 12 Nitrate is ND
3/16/2010 0 11 Nitrate is ND
5/26/2010 0 11 Nitrate is ND
7/12/2010 0 11 Nitrate is ND
12/6/2010 0 9 Nitrate is ND
1/25/2011 0 13 Nitrate is ND
4/18/2011 0 10 Nitrate is ND
7/26/2011 0 18 Nitrate is ND
10/17/2011 0 10 Nitrate is ND
1/9/2012 0 11 Nitrate is N D
4/18/2012 0 15 Nitrate is ND
7/24/2012 0 11 Nitrate is ND
10/15/2012 0 11.1 Nitrate is ND
TWN-9
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
8/25/2009 9.3 169
9/22/2009 8.9 201
11/10/2009 12 205
3/23/2010 7.6 183
6/1/2010 7.6 175
7/15/2010 10.7 210
12/9/2010 8 172
2/1/2011 9.5 217
4/28/2011 10 192
7/29/2011 11 208
10/20/2011 10.9 134
1/12/2012 12.2 202
4/20/2012 10.6 209
7/31/2012 12.3 215
10/15/2012 12.5 194
TWN-10
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
8/25/2009 1.1 19
9/22/2009 1.6 35
11/10/2009 1.4 26
3/23/2010 1.5 54
6/4/2010 1 30
7/14/2010 0.2 21
12/8/2010 1.3 28
1/27/2011 0.3 40
4/21/2011 1.2 28
7/27/2011 0.1 28
10/18/2011 0.2 33
1/10/2012 0.8 44
4/19/2012 0.9 28
7/25/2012 0.6 33
10/16/2012 0.119 30.8
TWN-11
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
11/3/2009 1.3 74
3/17/2010 1.4 73
6/4/2010 1.3 72
9/27/2010 1.4 76
12/8/2010 1.4 72
1/27/2011 1.4 84
4/26/2011 1.4 76
7/27/2011 0.1 76
10/17/2011 1.6 76
1/10/2012 1.6 69
4/19/2012 1.6 71
7/25/2012 1.8 77
10/16/2012 1.84 76.4
TWN-12
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
11/3/2009 0.5 109
3/17/2010 0.7 113
5/26/2010 0.8 106
7/12/2010 0.7 112
12/7/2010 0.7 103
1/26/2011 4.2 87
4/26/2011 1 109
7/26/2011 0.6 102
10/17/2011 1.2 87
1/10/2012 0.9 104
4/18/2012 1.2 106
7/25/2012 1.4 102
10/16/2012 1.41 101
TWN-13
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1) Notes
11/4/2009 0.5 83
3/17/2010 0 47 Nitrate ND
5/26/2010 0.1 49
9/27/2010 0.2 53
12/7/2010 0.4 57
1/25/20ll 1.6 103
4/26/2011 0 49 Nitrate ND
7/26/2011 0.1 49
10/17/2011 0 48 Nitrate NO
1/9/2012 0 46 Nitrate ND
4/18/2012 0 53 Nitrate ND
7/24/2012 0.1 48
10/15/2012 0 47.3 Nitrate NO
TWN-14
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
11/4/2009 3.4 32
3/24/2010 2.9 24
6/2/2010 2.9 30
7/15/2010 3.5 26
12/10/2010 4.2 28
1/28/2011 3.7 24
4/27/2011 3.5 30
7/29/2011 3.5 25
10/19/2011 3.9 27
1/11/2012 3.5 26
4/20/2012 3.4 27
7/27/2012 3.7 27
10/17/2012 4.03 27.4
TWN-15
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
11/10/2009 1.1 78
3/18/2010 0.7 43
5/28/2010 1.0 39
7/13/2010 1.0 36
12/9/2010 1.2 38
1/27/2011 1.4 43
4/27/2011 1.6 49
7/28/2011 1.6 47
10/19/2011 1.3 38
1/11/2012 1.5 38
4/20/2012 1.6 46
7/26/2012 2.1 so
10/17/2012 1.8 47
TWN-16
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
11/4/2009 1 39
3/17/2010 1.2 35
5/27/2010 0.2 35
9/27/2010 2.6 35
12/9/2010 2 30
1/27/2011 4.6 34
4/27/2011 1.6 39
7/27/2011 2.4 31
10/18/2011 2.6 34
1/10/2012 2.8 33
4/19/2012 2 so
7/25/2012 2.4 33
10/16/2012 2.5 32.1
TWN-17
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
11/4/2009 6.7 152
3/24/2010 10.4 78
6/3/2010 11 87
7/15/2010 8.9 66
12/10/2010 8 65
2/1/2011 8.6 90
4/28/2011 9 81
7/29/2011 8.5 74
10/20/2011 8.1 71
1/12/2012 8.7 79
4/20/2012 9.1 80
7/27/2012 9.5 85
10/17/2012 9.65 84.8
TWN-18
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
11/2/2009 1.3 57
3/17/2010 1.6 42
6/1/2010 1.8 63
9/27/2010 1.8 64
12/9/2010 1.6 59
1/27/2011 1.4 61
4/26/2011 1.8 67
7/28/2011 1.8 65
10/18/2011 1.9 60
1/10/2012 1.9 64
4/19/2012 2.1 64
7/26/2012 2.3 67
10/16/2012 1.95 67.5
2/18/2013 2.27 68.7
4/23/2013 2.32 64.3
8/27/2013 2.04 70.4
TWN-19
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
11/2/2009 7.4 125
3/23/2010 7.2 118
6/1/2010 6.2 113
9/29/2010 7.2 113
12/9/2010 7 107
2/1/2011 7 114
4/28/2011 6.9 120
7/28/2011 7.1 113
10/18/2011 6.5 108
1/10/2012 7 114
4/19/2012 6.8 117
7/26/2012 7.5 117
10/16/2012 7.7 118
Piezometer 1
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/19/2009 6.8 NA
7/14/2009 6.8 60
9/22/2009 7.3 78
10/27/2009 7.4 61
6/2/2010 7.2 52
7/19/2010 6.8 52
12/10/2010 6.5 60
1/31/2011 7 60
4/25/2011 6.8 58
7/25/2011 7 53
10/19/2011 6.6 55
1/11/2012 7.1 78
4/20/2012 6.6 58
7/27/2012 7.2 56
10/17/2012 7.66 55
2/18/2013 8.11 56.7
4/24/2013 8.88 53.3
8/28/2013 7.83 55.1
Piezometer 2
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/19/2009 0.5 NA
7/14/2009 0.5 7
9/22/2009 0.5 17
10/27/2009 0.6 7
6/2/2010 0.6 8
7/19/2010 0.6 8
12/10/2010 0.2 6
1/31/2011 0.3 9
4/25/2011 0.3 8
7/25/2011 0.1 9
10/19/2011 0.1 8
1/11/2012 0.1 9
4/20/2012 0.2 8
7/27/2012 0.2 9
10/17/2012 0.192 9.5
2/19/2013 0.218 9.67
4/24/2013 0.172 10.3
8/28/2013 0.198 9.66
Piezometer 3
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/19/2009 0.7 NA
7/14/2009 0.8 12
9/22/2009 0.8 24
10/27/2009 1.2 19
3/24/2010 1.7 116
6/2/2010 1.6 36
7/19/2010 1.6 35
12/10/2010 1.8 25
1/31/2011 1.8 40
4/25/2011 1.7 35
7/25/2011 1.8 61
10/19/2011 1.7 12
1/11/2012 1.8 20
4/20/2012 1.7 53
7/27/2012 1.8 21
10/17/2012 2.75 20.1
2/19/2013 1.85 21
4/24/2013 1.83 21.2
8/28/2013 1.81 22.4
Upper Wildlife Pond
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1) Note
9/22/2009 0 5 Nitrate ND
10/27/2009 0 3 Nitrate ND
6/2/2010 0 0 Nitrate and Chloride ND
7/19/2010 0 0 Nitrate and Chloride ND
12/10/2010 0 1 Nitrate ND
1/31/2011 0.1 1
4/25/2011 0 0 Nitrate and Chloride ND
7/25/2011 0 0 Nitrate and Chloride ND
10/19/2011 0 0 Nitrate and Chloride ND
1/11/2012 0 2 Nitrate ND
TW4-19
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
7/22/2002 42.80 12/7/2005 81
9/12/2002 47.60 3/9/2006 86
3/28/2003 61.40 7/20/2006 123
6/23/2003 11.40 11/9/2006 134
7/15/2003 6.80 2/28/2007 133
8/15/2003 4.00 8/15/2007 129
9/12/2003 5.70 10/10/2007 132
9/25/2003 9.20 3/26/2008 131
10/29/2003 7.70 6/25/2008 128
11/9/2003 4.80 9/10/2008 113
8/16/2004 9.91 10/15/2008 124
9/17/2004 4.50 3/4/2009 127
3/16/2005 5.30 6/23/2009 132
6/7/2005 5.70 9/14/2009 43
8/31/2005 4.60 12/14/2009 124
12/1/2005 0.10 2/17/2010 144
3/9/2006 4.00 6/9/2010 132
6/14/2006 5.20 8/16/2010 142
7/20/2006 4.30 10/11/2010 146
11/9/2006 4.60 2/17/2011 135
2/28/2007 4.00 6/7/2011 148
8/15/2007 4.10 8/17/2011 148
10/10/2007 4.00 11/17/2011 148
3/26/2008 2.20 1/23/2012 138
6/25/2008 2.81 6/6/2012 149
9/10/2008 36.20 9/5/2012 149
10/15/2008 47.80 10/3/2012 150
3/4/2009 3.20 2/11/2013 164
6/23/2009 2.40 6/5/2013 148
9/14/2009 0.10 9/3/2013 179
12/14/2009 26.70
2/17/2010 2.00
6/9/2010 4.40
8/16/2010 5.90
10/11/2010 2.70
2/17/2011 17.00
6/7/2011 12.00
8/17/2011 3.00
11/17/2011 5.00
1/23/2012 0.60
6/6/2012 2.40
9/5/2012 2.50
10/3/2012 4.10
2/11/2013 7.99
6/5/2013 2.95
9/3/2013 17.60
The sampling program for TW4-19 was updated in the fourth quarter of 2005
to include analysis for chloride as well as nitrate. This change accounts for the
different number of data points represented above.
TW4-21
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
5/25/2005 14.6 12/7/2005 353
8/31/2005 10.1 3/9/2006 347
11/30/2005 9.6 7/20/2006 357
3/9/2006 8.5 11/8/2006 296
6/14/2006 10.2 2/28/2007 306
7/20/2006 8.9 6/27/2007 327
11/8/2006 8.7 8/15/2007 300
2/28/2007 8.7 10/10/2007 288
6/27/2007 8.6 3/26/2008 331
8/15/2007 8.6 6/25/2008 271
10/10/2007 8.3 9/10/2008 244
3/26/2008 14.3 10/15/2008 284
6/25/2008 8.8 3/11/2009 279
9/10/2008 7.6 6/24/2009 291
10/15/2008 8.0 9/15/2009 281
3/11/2009 8.3 12/22/2009 256
6/24/2009 8.1 2/25/2010 228
9/15/2009 9.2 6/10/2010 266
12/22/2009 8.4 8/12/2010 278
2/25/2010 8.4 10/13/2010 210
6/10/2010 12.0 2/22/2011 303
8/12/2010 14.0 6/1/2011 297
10/13/2010 7.0 8/17/2011 287
2/22/2011 9.0 11/16/2011 276
6/1/2011 13.0 1/19/2012 228
8/17/2011 14.0 6/13/2012 285
11/16/2011 13.0 9/13/2012 142
1/19/2012 15.0 10/4/2012 270
6/13/2012 11.0 2/13/2013 221
9/13/2012 13.0 6/18/2013 243
10/4/2012 14.0 9/12/2013 207
2/13/2013 11.8
6/18/2013 13.8
9/12/2013 10.3
The sampling program for TW4-21 was updated in the fourth quarter of 2005
to include analysis for chloride as well as nitrate. This change accounts for the
different number of data points represented above.
TW4-22
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1) Notes
2/28/2007 20.9 347
6/27/2007 19.3 273
8/15/2007 19.3 259
10/10/2007 18.8 238
3/26/2008 39.1 519
6/25/2008 41.9 271
9/10/2008 38.7 524
10/15/2008 36.3 539
3/11/2009 20.7 177
6/24/2009 20.6 177
9/15/2009 40.3 391
12/29/2009 17.8 175
3/3/2010 36.6 427
6/15/2010 19 134
8/12/2010 18 127
8/24/2010 15 130
10/13/2010 16 134
2/23/2011 18 114
6/1/2011 17 138
8/17/2011 15 120
11/16/2011 19 174
1/19/2012 14 36
6/13/2012 12.8 35
9/12/2012 7 121
10/4/2012 14 130
2/11/2013 58 635
6/5/2013 50.2 586
9/3/2013 29.7 487
TW4-24
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1) Notes
6/27/2007 26.1 770
8/15/2007 29 791
10/10/2007 24.7 692
3/26/2008 24.4 740
6/25/2008 45.3 834
9/10/2008 38.4 1180
10/15/2008 44.6 1130
3/4/2009 30.5 1010
6/24/2009 30.4 759
9/15/2009 30.7 618
12/17/2009 28.3 1080
2/25/2010 33.1 896
6/9/2010 30 639
8/11/2010 32 556
8/24/2010 31 587
10/6/2010 31 522
2/17/2011 31 1100
5/26/2011 35 1110
8/17/2011 34 967
11/16/2011 35 608
1/18/2012 37 373
6/6/2012 37 355
8/30/2012 37 489
10/3/2012 38 405
2/11/2013 35.9 1260
6/5/2013 23.7 916
9/3/2013 32.6 998
TW4-25
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1) Notes
6/27/2007 17.1 395
8/15/2007 16.7 382
10/10/2007 17 356
3/26/2008 18.7 374
6/25/2008 22.1 344
9/10/2008 18.8 333
10/15/2008 21.3 366
3/4/2009 15.3 332
6/24/2009 15.3 328
9/15/2009 3.3 328
12/16/2009 14.2 371
2/23/2010 14.4 296
6/8/2010 16 306
8/10/2010 14 250
10/5/2010 15 312
2/16/2011 15 315
5/25/2011 16 321
8/16/2011 16 276
11/15/2011 16 294
1/18/2012 16 304
5/31/2012 16 287
9/11/2012 17 334
10/3/2012 17 338
2/11/2013 9.04 190
6/5/2013 5.24 136
9/3/2013 5.69 119
MW-30
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
6/22/2005 12.4 6/22/2005 125
9/22/2005 12.8 9/22/2005 125
12/14/2005 13.6 12/14/2005 128
3/22/2006 13.8 3/22/2006 125
6/21/2006 14.5 6/21/2006 124
9/13/2006 14.1 9/13/2006 118
10/25/2006 14.6 10/25/2006 124
3/15/2007 14.4 3/15/2007 125
8/22/2007 14.6 8/22/2007 126
10/24/2007 14.9 10/24/2007 122
3/19/2008 14.8 3/19/2008 118
6/3/2008 18.7 6/3/2008 125
8/4/2008 17.3 8/4/2008 121
11/5/2008 15.6 11/5/2008 162
2/3/2009 15.3 2/3/2009 113
5/13/2009 15.1 5/13/2009 122
8/24/2009 20.9 8/24/2009 118
10/14/2009 15.0 10/14/2009 129
1/20/2010 15.4 1/20/2010 106
2/9/2010 16.1 2/9/2010 127
4/27/2010 15.8 4/27/2010 97
5/24/2010 17.0 9/14/2010 111
6/15/2010 15.3 11/9/2010 126
8/24/2010 16.0 2/1/2011 134
9/14/2010 15.0 4/11/2011 134
10/19/2010 15.0 5/10/2011 128
11/9/2010 15.0 6/20/2011 127
12/14/2010 16.0 7/5/2011 127
1/10/2011 15.0 8/3/2011 126
2/1/2011 16.0 9/7/2011 145
3/14/2011 17.0 10/4/2011 129
4/11/2011 16.0 11/8/2011 122
5/10/2011 16.0 12/12/2011 124
6/20/2011 17.0 1/24/2012 124
7/5/2011 17.0 2/14/2012 126
8/3/2011 14.0 3/14/2012 128
9/7/2011 16.0 4/10/2012 128
10/4/2011 16.0 5/2/2012 124
11/8/2011 16.0 6/18/2012 131
12/12/2011 16.0 7/10/2012 128
1/24/2012 17.0 8/7/2012 139
2/14/2012 17.0 9/19/2012 130
3/14/2012 18.0 10/23/2012 135
4/10/2012 17.0 11/13/2012 114
5/2/2012 16.0 12/26/2012 122
MW-30
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
6/18/2012 15.0 1/23/2013 128
7/10/2012 17.0 2/26/2013 129
8/7/2012 18.0 3/20/2013 126
9/19/2012 16.0 4/17/2013 117
10/23/2012 16.2 5/15/2013 119
11/13/2012 18.5 6/25/2013 127
12/26/2012 17.2 7/10/2013 130
1/23/2013 19.2 8/20/2013 126
2/26/2013 21.4 9/18/2013 131
3/20/2013 14.3
4/17/2013 16.8
5/15/2013 18.8
6/25/2013 16.1
7/10/2013 17.6
8/20/2013 16.4
9/18/2013 16.9
Under the groundwater sampling progran, accelerated monitoring for nitrate began in MW-
30 prior to when the accelerated monitoring for chloride began. This difference accounts for
the different number of data points represented above.
MW-31
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
6/22/2005 24.2 6/22/2005 139
9/22/2005 22.4 9/22/2005 136
12/14/2005 23.8 12/14/2005 135
3/22/2006 24.1 3/22/2006 133
6/21/2006 25.3 6/21/2006 138
9/13/2006 24.6 9/13/2006 131
10/25/2006 25.1 10/25/2006 127
3/15/2007 23.2 3/15/2007 132
3/15/2007 22.0 3/15/2007 132
8/27/2007 23.3 8/27/2007 136
10/24/2007 24.6 10/24/2007 122
3/19/2008 25.0 3/19/2008 124
6/3/2008 29.3 6/3/2008 128
8/4/2008 28.7 8/4/2008 124
11/11/2008 29.9 11/11/2008 119
2/3/2009 23.4 2/3/2009 115
5/13/2009 22.4 5/13/2009 124
8/24/2009 15.4 8/24/2009 122
10/14/2009 22.6 10/14/2009 138
2/9/2010 21.7 2/9/2010 128
4/20/2010 22.5 4/20/2010 128
5/21/2010 23.0 9/13/2010 139
6/15/2010 21.1 11/9/2010 138
8/24/2010 22.0 2/1/2011 145
9/13/2010 21.0 4/1/2011 143
10/19/2010 20.0 5/10/2011 143
11/9/2010 20.0 6/20/2011 145
12/14/2010 20.0 7/5/2011 148
1/10/2011 19.0 8/2/2011 148
2/1/2011 21.0 9/6/2011 148
3/14/2011 22.0 10/3/2011 145
4/1/2011 21.0 11/8/2011 145
5/10/2011 20.0 12/12/2011 148
6/20/2011 22.0 1/24/2012 155
7/5/2011 22.0 2/13/2012 150
8/2/2011 20.0 3/13/2012 152
9/6/2011 21.0 4/9/2012 160
10/3/2011 21.0 5/2/2012 151
11/8/2011 21.0 6/18/2012 138
12/12/2011 21.0 7/9/2012 161
1/24/2012 21.0 8/6/2012 175
2/13/2012 21.0 9/18/2012 172
3/13/2012 22.0 10/22/2012 157
4/9/2012 21.0 11/6/2012 189
5/2/2012 20.0 12/18/2012 170
MW-31
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
6/18/2012 21.6 1/22/2013 176
7/9/2012 21.0 2/19/2013 174
8/6/2012 21.0 3/19/2013 168
9/18/2012 21.0 4/16/2013 171
10/22/2012 18.0 5/13/2013 169
11/6/2012 23.6 6/24/2013 179
12/18/2012 22.2 7/9/2013 182
1/22/2013 22.8 8/19/2013 183
2/19/2013 19.3 9/17/2013 193
3/19/2013 19.1
4/16/2013 18.8
5/13/2013 23.8
6/24/2013 20.0
7/9/2013 21.7
8/19/2013 16.0
9/17/2013 21.2
Under the groundwater sampling progran, accelerated monitoring for nitrate
began in MW-31 prior to when the accelerated monitoring for chloride began.
This difference accounts for the different number of data points represented
above.
TabK
Concentration Trend Graphs
U) c
0 +::i cu .... -c
C1)
(,) c
0 (.)
C1) -cu .... . ~ z ,...
I z 3': 1-
co c)
(1f6W)
"! 0
0
~~-des
~ ~-qe::J
o ~ -f3nv
o ~-uer
60-1nr
so-oeo
tn c 0
".+::0 as --c
(L)
(.) c 0 0
(L)
"C "i:
0
.c
0 ,...
I z 3: 1-
~------~--------.-------~--------~-------,--------.-8~-AON
~~-des
~ ~-qe.:J
-o ~ -5nv
· o ~-uer
80-080
1---------+-------+-------t------t------+-----+ so-unr
LO C\J 0 C\J 0 LO 0
U) c: 0 ;
C'CI "--c:
C1)
(J c: 0
0
C1) -C'CI "-."!:: z
N I z := 1-
r-----~----,-----~----~----~------r-----~----,-----~8~-AON
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.::J
. o ~ -onv
-0~-uer
. ao-oaa
r-----+-----~----~-----+----~------~----~----~----~-ao-unr
0 0) 0 co 0 CD 0 0
1.{) """ (1t6w)
0 C') 0 C\1 0
t/) c 0 "+:0 tU ... -c Cl)
(J c 0
(.)
Cl)
"'C ·;:::
0
J:
(.)
N I z
3: 1-
~-------,--------~--------,---------r-------~--------~8~-AON
~~-des
~ ~ -qa.:J
-o ~ -Bnv
o~-uer
-60·1nr
-so-oaa
~-------+--------+--------+--------4--------4--------~so-unr
0 C\J
T"""
0 0
T"""
0 co 0 CD
(1t6w)
0 C\J 0
rn E: 0 ·.; ca :r... -E:
Cl) u E: 0 0
Cl) -ca :r... .~ z
C") I z
3: ....
.-----~r-----~------~-------.------~-------r------~8~-AON
. ~ ~-das
~ ~ -qa.:J
o ~ -Bnv
-o ~-uer
5o-1nr
so-:Jaa
~------~----~-------4-------+-------+------~-------+so-unr
L!)
(V)
L!)
C\1
0
C\1
(1J6W)
L!) 0 L!) 0
T""" T"""
en c 0 ·.w
(0 "-.. c C1)
(,) c 0 (.)
C1)
'tJ 'i:
.2 .c (.)
M I z ~
.-----~----~----~----~----,-----~----~----~----~-8~-AON
· 8 ~ -liBII'J
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa,:j
o ~ -6nv
0~-uer
6o-1nr
eo-oaa
~----~----+-----+-----+-----+-----4-----4-----4------+eo-unr
0 co 0 <D 0 "' 0 0 ,.... 0 co
{1/6W)
0 <D 0 "' 0
(IJ c
0 '+:0 m ,_ -c
C1)
(.) c
0 (.)
C1) -m ,_
~ z
lll:t' I z ~
~----~----~-----r----~----~------r-----~----~-----r 8~-AON
~~-des
~ ~ -qa.::l
o ~ -6n'v'
o ~-uer
6o-1nr
· so-oaa
~----~----+-----+-----+-----+-----~----~----~-----+80-unr
T"' <X)
0
(1t6w)
c.o 0
(\J
0 0
Cl)
E: 0 ·.:: «< '--E: Cl)
(J
E: 0 0
Cl) ,
'i: 0
J: 0
o::t I z ;:
1-
~-----r----~------,-----~------~----~------r-----~8~-AON
~ ~-das
-~ ~ -qa.:J
o~-Bnv
o ~-uer
6o-1nr
so-:::>aa
1----1------l--------Jf----+----+-----J.----+----+ so-unr
1.{)
(")
0 (")
1.{)
C\J 0 C\J
(1f6W}
0 1.{) 0
tn c:
0 .. ftS ... -c:
G) u c: 0 (..)
G) -ftS ...
. t: z
Ln I z ~
~------~-------,--------~------~--------r--------r 8~-Ae~
~~-des
~ ~-qa;:l
o ~ -onv
o ~-uer
-6o-1nr
~------~--------+--------+--------+--------4--------+Bo-~aa
('t)
0
(1t6w)
N 0 0
t/) c
0 +=i co ... -c Cl)
(,) c 0 (.)
Cl)
"C 'i: ..2 .l: (.)
Lt) I z ~
.-----.--------.,.-----.....-------.-----...-----.-8 ~-lie~
. ~ ~-das
. ~ ~-qa.::J
. o ~ -onv
· 0~-uer
~-------4--------~--------4---------~------~--------~so-oaa
0 C.D 0 10 0 C\1
0 0
.------.-----,------.-----....------...------.------r 8 ~ -Ael/\l
,. ~~-des
Cl) c:
0 -..:::; m 1.. -c: Cl.)
(J c: ~ ~-qa::J 0 0
Cl.) -m 1.. .:t:: z
(0
I -o ~-Bnv z ~
~ 0~-uer
~----4~-----4-------+-------+------~------~----~-BO-oao
C\1 0
(1/6W)
Cl) c 0 ·.;:: ca .... -c Cl) u c 0 0
Cl)
"C ·~
.2 .c 0
co I z ~
0 <X>
~
~ ~ ~
t
0 <D 0 l.O
J
~
~
' ~
~
~
~ >
~ ~
..
0 ('I)
' ·~
J ~ .
0 N
~ ~-das
o ~ -6ny
o ~-uer
-
eo-oaa
0 0
~---------r----------r----------r----------~---------r 8~-AON
c ~ -Jd'v'
In c:
0 ...
C'CS ... -c:
Cl)
(.) c: . ~~-des 0 (.)
Cl) -C'CS ...
:!::::: z
...... I z ~ ~-qa.::l
3: ....
o ~ -onv
o ~-uer
.,_ ________ +--------1------lf------1------+ eo-1nr
C\J 1.0 0
0
(1t6w)
~------~--------~------~--------~------~--------~8~-AON
~~-JdV
In
r::::
0 +=l C'a ... ~ ~-das -r:::: G> u r::::
0 0
G> "C ·.:: ~ ~-qa.:J
0
.c 0
...... I z 3: o~-Bnv ....
o~-uer
-5o-1nr
~-------+---------+--------1----------+---------+--------+, eo-naa
C\1 co 0 .,--
(1f6W)
f/)
s:::::
0 ~ :I.. -s:::::
Cl)
(.)
s:::::
0 0
Cl) -m :I.. :!:: z
co I z
3:: t-
0)
0
-C)
Q) -Q) 0
c: 0 z
""iii
Q) .... (lj
C/) c: 0 ·~ (lj .... -c: Q) C) c: 0 ()
Q) ~ .... -z
co I z ~ I-
co
0
c.o I!) 0 0
(1J6W)
I
~
~
~
~
•
.
0
8 ~ -iiell\l
~ ~-das
o ~ -5ny
o ~-uer
6o-1nr
so-oaa
..---,----.-----,....----..---~--.,----.----.----..----.-8 ~ -ABV\1
~ ~-das
1/)
t:
0 ·~ as ... -t: Cl)
(,)
t: ~ ~-qa::l 0 0
Cl)
'0 'i:
.2 .J:. 0
co -o ~ -finv I z ;:
1-
-0~-uer
(1/6W)
·r-------,------r-----,-----.----...------r---"""T·· 8 ~-ABL"J
~ ~-das
t/) c:
0 ; ns ... -c: CD (.) c: ~ ~ -qa::l 0 0
CD -ns ... . ~ z
0)
I o ~ -Bnv z ~
o ~-uer
· 60-lnr
f----~1-----+-----+----+----+-----+----t so-oaa
C\J C\J 0
(1/6W)
1/)
I: 0 '.t= as "--I:
Q)
(,)
I: 0 0
Q) ,
'i:
£ .c 0
Q)
I z ~
0 U)
C\1
0 0 C\1
0 U) ......
(1/6W)
0 0 ......
0 U) 0
~~-des
~ ~-qa.::l
o ~ -onv
0~-uer
.----,.-----,,-------,---..---"T-----r------.----r----r 8 ~ -liBV'J
o ~ -uer
-8Q-Q80
~ ~ ""': C\l co c.o '<:t C\J 0
.....-.....-0 0 0 0
(1/6W)
1/) c 0 :;:::;
CIS :t.. -c
Cl)
() c 0 0
Cl)
'C 'i:
..2 .c
0
0
""' I z
3: 1-
.-----.-----"""T"-----.,.----..-------.-------.-8 ~ -ABV\1
• ~ ~-das
~ ~-qa~
-o ~-6ny
-o~-uer
~------~--------+--------+--------+--------4--------+so-oaa
0 <.0
0
L{)
0 (")
(1f6W)
0 C\1 0 r-0
f/) c 0 -~ ... -c Cl)
(,) c 0 0
Cl) -e ~ z
T""
T"" I z 3: 1-
,
~.
~
.....
~...--
~
~
~
C\1
----------------
(1/6W)
co ci
.
CD ci
~
C\1 ci
.
-
0
~~-des
o~-onv
o~-u-er
w c 0 :;:; «< ... -c G> (J c 0 (.)
G> "C ·.:::
.2 ~
(.)
T"'
T"' I z ~
0 0>
•
'\
.I
~
~ v
0 CX)
~
~
~
0 (!) 0 lO
(1J6w)
0 ('t) 0 C\J
.
.
~~-des
. o ~ -5nv
0 0
T"""
tn c 0 '+=i m ,_ -c
C1)
() c
0 0
! m ,_ .::: z
N ,....
I z ~
L{)
C\1
C\1
(1t6w)
~·
"
......
'
~
0
L{)
0
-
-
0
~~-des
~ ~-qe.::l
o ~ -onv
0~-uer
5o-1nr
tn s:::: 0 ·~ "' ... -s:::: Q)
(,)
s::::
0 (.)
Q)
"'C ·.::::
0
.s:::: (.)
N ,....
I z
3: 1-
.-------,------.,.------.-----....... ----.,------,.. 8 ~-ABV'J
~ ~-das
-~ ~-qa~
o~-onv
o~-uer
1----+-----+-----t----+----+-----+ eo-1nr
0 (\J ,...
0 0 0 co 0 CD
(1f6W}
0 (\J 0
1/) c: 0 ; m ... -c:
G)
CJ c: 0 0
! m ... • t::: z
M
T"' I z ~
co
c:i
~
1~
~
-
~.
v /~
C\1 c:i
' 0
~ ~-das
o ~ -onv
0~-uer
en r:::: 0 '.j:i ca '--r::::
(I)
CJ r:::: 0 (.)
(I)
'1J 'i:
.2 .c (.)
M ,....
I z ~
..-----.-------.-----.---------r-----.......------.-8 ~-Aelfll
~ ~-das
-~ ~-qa.:l
o ~ -onv
-0~-uer
1-----+------1----+-----+----1-----+ 60·1nr
0 C\1
T"""
0 0
T"""
0 00 0
<0
(1t6w)
0 C\1 0
Cl) c 0 ',i:i
~ -c C1)
(.) c 0
0
C1) -m 1-.:t:: z
o:::t ,....
I z
~
• \
)
~
~
~
)
\ "
I
~ ~-das
-0 ~ -t3ny
1"'11 ~
~~
o ~-uer
5o-1nr
C\1 I[) 0
c:i
en s:::: 0 +=i co ... -s::::
C1)
(,)
s:::: 0 (.)
C1)
"C 'i:
0
.c
(.)
"'::t
T"' I z
3: 1-
.------.------.-----.----...------..,....-----,----~ 8 ~-A'BII'J
-~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.:J
-o~-5nv
o ~-uer
1------!----1-----1----+-----11-----+----4 eo-1nr
L(')
C')
L(')
C\J 0 C\J
(1J6W)
L(') 0 L(') 0 .,...-.,...-
"' c 0
',j:i as .... -c Q)
(.) c
0 0
Q) -as .... . ~ z
Lt) ,...
I z ~
.-------r-------.-------r------r-------.-8 ~ -kei,AJ
~~-des
~ ~ -qe;:j
-o ~ -onv
-o ~-Ul:w
1------+-------1---------l'--------l-------1-5o-1nr
C\1
(1t6w)
U')
0
0
en c:
0 ;: ca ... -s: Cl)
CJ c:
0 (..)
Cl) ,
·.::::
0
J: (..)
Lt) ,....
I z ~
0 0> 0 CX)
~
~
~~
(~
\ ~
v
v LJ
v
0 co 0 0
1.!) '<:t
(1J6W)
0 C\J 0 ,....
.
r
-
.
0
~ ~-das
o ~ -5nv
o~-uer
.-----r--.--~r---.---.----r--.,----r--------r----r 8 ~ -ABV\1
en c 0 ';i:i ~~-des tU .... -c C1)
() c
0
(.)
C1) -tU .... -~ ~-qa::J .~ z
co ,....
I z ;: ....
o ~ -6ny
· o ~-uer
1---1---+--~t----+--+----+---+---+---+--+ 6o-1nr
L{) C\1 0
C\i
(1t6w)
tn
r:::: 0 ':i:i C'a ... -r::::
G> u
r:::: 0 0
G> ,
"i: ..2 .s::
0
(0
T""" I z 3: 1-
.----.,-----,-------r----;----.,-----r £~-liB VII
~ ~-das
-~ ~-qa.::J
o~-onv
. o~-uer
1-----1------+----+-----+----t------+ 50-1nr
0 CD
0 LO
(1J6W)
0 C\J 0 .,.... 0
.------,-----.----...,..-------r-----r----""'" 8 ~ -li'eV\1
1/) c 0 ... ~ ~-das ca :I.. -c
Cl)
() c 0 0
Cl) -ca :I.. .~ ~ ~ -qa.:J z
....... ,....
I z ;:
1-
. o ~ -5nv
. o~-uer
1------+-----+-----r------+-----r------t-6o-1nr
N 0 N 0 ,.-
(1f6W)
tn t:: 0 += cu ... -t::
(I)
()
t:: 0 (.)
(I) ,
·.::::
0
.t::
(.)
r--. ,..
I z ~
0 co ,.-
•
~
\
~
~
L ~.
\ v
p. v v
~ v
0 v ,.-
0 C\J ,.-
0 0 0 co
(1J6W)
0 co 0 v 0 C\J
.
~~-des
. o ~ -onv
o~-uar
0
8~-AON
• 8~-ABI/\J
o ~ -Bnv
o ~-uer
6o-1nr
(\J 1.() 0 ci
(1/6W)
en c
0 '+::0 ca '--c Q)
(,) c 0 (.)
Q)
"C 'i: .2 .c (.)
co
"'"" I z ~
~----~------~----~------~----~------~----~------~8~-AON
c ~ -Jd'lf
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa~
o ~ -Bnv
0~-uer
t----+----t-----lr---+-----t----+---1-----t-60-lnr
0 co 0 <D 0 LO 0 "<t
(1f6w)
0 C\1 0 ..... 0
tn s::::: 0 "+=i C'IS I.. -s::::: Cl)
CJ
s::::: 0
(.)
Cl) -C'IS I.. .:t:: z
Q) ,....
I z ~
4
1
~
r
~
co
.
r
. ~~-des
~
~
-o~-Bnv
o~-uer
0
(1J6W)
en c:
0 ·.;::; ca ... -c: Cl)
(.) c:
0 0
Cl)
1J ·a:
0
.J:
0
0)
T"" I z := t-
.-------.-----.---..,,.--.....,....---.-------r---r---..-------,..---.. 8 ~ -Aeii'J
-~~-des
~ ~ -qa.:J
o~-6nv
1----+---+----l---+---+---t---+---+---+---!-60-lnr
<0 C\J ,-
-q-
C\J ,-
C\J C\J 0 C\J co <0 0 ,-
(1/6W)
co 0 <0 0
II) c 0 ·= as 1.. -c
Cl)
(J c 0 (..)
Cl)
E .~ z
1.. Cl)
G)
E 0 N .!!! c..
0 ,.-
K
~
1\
•
~
~
(
~
'
O'l
8 ~-AeV\1
~
~ ~~-des
~
o~-Bnv
o~-uer
~ ~· -6o-1nr
~
so-oaa
so-unr
0
(1f6W)
tn
s::::: 0
+=i a:s "--s::::: G,) u
s::::: 0
0
G,)
"'C 'i: ~ J: 0 ,....
"-~ E 0 N .9:! a.
0 (j)
<
0 co
-~
,
~
~
~
v u
~
0
0
,__, ........
~~
0 (0 0 0 LO "<!"
(1J6W)
0 C') 0 C\J
0
£~·AON
~ ~-das
o ~ -Bnv
o~-uer
6o-1nr
-eo-::>aa
0
1/) c
0 '+=0 ~ lo. -c C1)
(.) c
0 0
C1) -~ lo. ~ z
C\1
lo.
C1) -C1)
E 0 N C1)
0::
r------,.-----~-------.-------.-------r-------.-------r 8~-AON
-c~-JdV
~ ~-das
-~ ~-qa.:::l
o~-onv
o ~-uer
5o-1nr
. so-oaa
~----~r-----~-------+-------+-------r-------r------~so-unr
": 0
CD
0
0
(1/6W)
U) c: 0 '+:i f! -c: Q)
C.> c: 0
0
Q)
"0 ·;:::
.2 .r::. 0
N
11..
Q)
i E 0 N Q) a:
co C\1 ,.... ,....
~
~
~
•
•
I •
~
~
0 co
(1t6w)
8~-AON
~~-des
o ~ -onv
o~-uer
-.
~ so-oea
C\1 0
~------~------------------~--------~------~---------r 8~-AON
-c ~ -Jd'v'
en t: 0 '+: ~~-des "' .... -t:
G)
(,)
t: 0 (.) ~ ~-qa.:J
G) -"' .... . ~ z
('I) .... -o ~ -Bnv G)
G)
E 0 N .! c.. -o~-uer
eo<>aa
~------~--------+--------+--------+--------4--------+eo-unr
C\J I.() 0 0
(1J6W)
In c
0 '+=' cu "--c cu (.) c
0 (..)
cu "0 ·.::
0
.s::. (..)
C")
"-cu G)
E 0 N cu 0:
r-------~------~------~------~------~------~------~8~-AON
c ~ -Jd'v'
-~ ~-das
-~ ~-qa.:J
. o ~ -Bnv
o ~-uer
1-------.,1------1----+----+-----1-----+----+ 80-:)90
0 C\J 0 0 0 CX)
(1t6w)
0 <.0 0 C\J 0
(/) c 0 ·.;:
ftS ... -c Cl) u c 0 (.)
! ftS ... .t:: z
"t1 c 0
0..
~
"t1 -a: ...
Cl) c. c. :::J
C\1
0
L.----"
CX)
0 0
--------------
""" 0 0
C\1 0 0
~
~ ~-oaa
~
~~-des
~ ~
~ ~-unr
......,j
......
0 ~-/\ON
o ~ -5ny
~~
0 ~ -liBII\I
o~-uer
~~ 60-PO
~~
6o-1nr
0
.------.-------,-----...,..-------r----,------r ~ ~-Jdy
~~-des
In
s::::: ~ ~ -unr 0 ·.;; cu Jo.. -s::::: Cl)
(.)
s::::: ~ ~ -qa.:J 0 0
Cl)
"C ·.:
0
::2 0 0~-AON
"C
s:::::
0 c..
Cl) ~
:2 -o~-onv
~
Jo..
Cl) a. a. ::::) 0 ~-ABII'J
-o ~-uer
60-PO
1------1-----+----+-----+-----r------+ 5o-1nr
c.o 1.() C') C\J 0
(1J6W)
0 0 0
f.-' 0 0 0
N 0 0 0
w 0 0 0
""" 0 0 0
l/1
0 0 0
en 0 0 0
-..,J
0 0 0
1 1112oo2 1 I I I I ~ I I I
11/1/2002 •.
3/1/2003 -
7/1/2003
11/1/2003
3/1/2004 -
7/1/2004
11/1/2004
3/1/2005 -
7/1/2005
11/1/2005
3/1/2006 -
7/1/2006
11/1/2006
3/1/2007
7/1/2007
11/1/2007
3/1/2008
7/1/2008
11/1/2008
3/1/2009
7/1/2009
11/1/2009 t 1 1 •
3/1/2010
7/1/2010 "
11/1/2010 ..
3/1/2011 .
7/1/2011
11/1/2011
3/1/2012 .
7/1/2012 .
11/1/2012 .
3/1/2013 -
7/1/2013
~ :E ~ I
~
U)
z
;:::;:
Ql
r1' tD
n 0 ::::s n tD ::::s
r1'
Ql
r1' -· 0
::::s
V)
0
12/1/2005
3/1/2006
6/1/2006
9/1/2006
12/1/2006
3/1/2007 -
6/1/2007
9/1/2007
12/1/2007
3/1/2008
6/1/2008
9/1/2008
12/1/2008 •.
3/1/2009
6/1/2009 -
9/1/2009
12/1/2009
3/1/2010 -
6/1/2010 -
9/1/2010 ..
12/1/2010
3/1/2011 .
6/1/2011
9/1/2011
12/1/2011
3/1/2012 .
6/1/2012 .
9/1/2012
12/1/2012 -
3/1/2013
6/1/2013 •.
9/1/2013 .
N 0 """ 0 0'1 0 00 0
1-' 0 0
1-' N 0
1-'
""" 0
1-' 0'1 0
1-' 00 0
N 0 0
...... :e ~ I .-
\0
n :T -0 ~ -· c. tD
n 0
:l n tD :l "' ~ Q)
"' -· 0
:l
V'
5/1/2005
8/1/2005
0
0
11/1/2005 -
2/1/2006
5/1/2006 .
8/1/2006 -
11/1/2006
2/1/2007
5/1/2007
8/1/2007
11/1/2007
2/1/2008 -
5/1/2008
8/1/2008
11/1/2008 .
2/1/2009 -
5/1/2009
8/1/2009
11/1/2009
2/1/2010 -
5/1/2010
8/1/2010
11/1/2010
2/1/2011
5/1/2011 .
8/1/2011 .
11/1/2011 -
2/1/2012
5/1/2012
8/1/2012 -
11/1/2012
2/1/2013
5/1/2013
8/1/2013
N 0 """ 0 0'1 00 0 0
...... 0 0
......
N 0
......
""" 0
......
0'1 0
-f :E ~ I N ...,a.
z ;::;
Ql ,...
tD
n 0
::::s n tD
::::s ,... ...,
QJ ,... -· 0
::::s
"'
0
12/1/2005
3/1/2006
6/1/2006
9/1/2006
12/1/2006
3/1/2007
6/1/2007
9/1/2007
12/1/2007
3/1/2008
6/1/2008 .,
9/1/2008 -
12/1/2008
3/1/2009
6/1/2009
9/1/2009
12/1/2009
3/1/2010
6/1/2010
9/1/2010 -
12/1/2010
3/1/2011
6/1/2011
9/1/2011
12/1/2011 -1
3/1/2012 ..J
6/1/2012
9/1/2012
12/1/2012
3/1/2013
6/1/2013
9/1/2013
l.n 0
1--' 0 0
1--' l.n 0
N 0 0
N l.n 0
w 0 0
w l.n 0
~ 0 0
-4 :E ~ I N .....
n ~ -0 .., -· a. tD
n 0
::::J n tD
::::J ,...
Ql ,... -· 0
::::J
(/»
"' c:
0 ·-..,
"' 1.. ..,
c: cu u c:
0 u
cu ..,
"' 1.. .., ·-z
N N I ~ ;:
1-
0 I'-0 \D
0
Lll
1/BW
0 M 0 N 0 rl
M rl 0 N -00 N -N
N rl 0 N -0'1 N ~
rl rl 0 N -00 N -N
0 rl 0 N -00 N -N
0'1 0 0 N -00 N -N
00 0 0 N cn-N -N
1"'-0 0 N ~ 0~
N
....
'Qa E
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
2/28/2007
TW4-22 Chloride Concentrations
2/29/2008 2/28/2009 2/28/2010 2/28/2011 2/29/2012 2/28/2013
50
45
40
35
30
..... "iio 25 E
20
15
10
5
0
6/27/2007
TW4-24 Nitrate Concentrations
6/27/2008 6/27/2009 6/27/2010 6/27/2011 6/27/2012 6/27/2013
V) c
0 ·-....,
ns '-...., c cv u c
0 u
cv
"'C ·-'-0
..c u
lll::t N I
lll::t s 1-
0 ~ .-t
0 0 N .-t
0 0 0 .-t
0 0 00
1/BW
0 0 \D
0 0 o::t
0 0 N
N .-t 0 N -...... N -\D
.-t .-t 0 N -...... N -\D
0 .-t 0 N -...... N -\D
en 0 0 N -...... N -\D
00 0 0 N ;:::-
N ~
...... 0 0 N -...... o.r::
\D
V) c:
0 ·-+"' ru ~ +"' c: cu u c:
0 u
cu +"' ru ~
+"' ·-z
Ln
N
I
111::1' 3: ~
IJl N 0 N IJl .-I
1/BW
0 .-t IJl
.-t .-t 0 N '-. r--N '-. ~
0 .-t 0 N '-. r--N '-. ~
0'1 0 0 N '-. r--N '-. ~
00 0 0 N ;::::-
N '-. ~
V) c
0 ·-otJ "' """ otJ c cu u c
0 u
cu
"'C ·-""" 0
~ u
Ln N I ~ 3: ......
0 0 0 0 0 Lll 0 Lll 0 Lll <:t <:t M M N
0 0 0 0 0 Lll 0 Lll N rl .-i
11aw
0
N rl 0 N ......... I' N ~
rl
rl 0 N ......... I' N ......... 1.0
0 rl 0 N ......... I' N ......... 1.0
Ol 0 0 N ......... I' N ......... 1.0
00 0 0 N ~ N ~
I' 0 0 N ......... I' N ......... 1.0
6/1/2005
9/1/2005
0 0
12/1/2005 ..
3/1/2006
6/1/2006 •.
9/1/2006
12/1/2006 -
3/1/2007
6/1/2007 ~
9/1/2007
12/1/2007 .
3/1/2008
6/1/2008
9/1/2008
12/1/2008
3/1/2009
6/1/2009
9/1/2009 "I
12/1/2009 -
3/1/2010 .,
6/1/2010
9/1/2010
12/1/2010
3/1/2011
6/1/2011 -
9/1/2011
12/1/2011
3/1/2012
6/1/2012
9/1/2012
12/1/2012
3/1/2013
6/1/2013 •.
9/1/2013
V1
0
1-' 0
0
1-'
V1
0
N 9
0
N V1
0
s ~ I w
0
z ;::;
Ql ,...
tD
n 0 :::s n tD :::s ,...
Ql ,... -· 0 :::s <n
0
6/1/2005
9/1/2005
12/1/2005
3/1/2006
6/1/2006
9/1/2006 _,
12/1/2006
3/1/2007
6/1/2007
9/1/2007
12/1/2007
3/1/2008
6/1/2008
9/1/2008
12/1/2008
3/1/2009
6/1/2009
9/1/2009
12/1/2009
3/1/2010
6/1/2010
9/1/2010
12/1/2010
3/1/2011
6/1/2011
9/1/2011
12/1/2011
3/1/2012 .
6/1/2012 .
9/1/2012 ..
12/1/2012
3/1/2013
6/1/2013
9/1/2013
N 0 +:> 0 0"1 0 00 0
......
0 0
...... N 0
...... +:> 0
...... 0"1 0
...... 00 0
s: :e I w
0
n
::::T -0 ., -· a.
t1)
n 0
::::J n
t1)
::::J ,....
Ql ,.... -· 0
::::J
"'
0
0
6/1/2005 -
9/1/2005
12/1/2005
3/1/2006
6/1/2006
9/1/2006
12/1/2006
3/1/2007
6/1/2007
9/1/2007 •.
12/1/2007 -
3/1/2008
6/1/2008
9/1/2008
12/1/2008
3/1/2009
6/1/2009
9/1/2009 .
12/1/2009
3/1/2010
6/1/2010
9/1/2010 .
12/1/2010
3/1/2011 •.
6/1/2011
9/1/2011
12/1/2011
3/1/2012 .
6/1/2012 ·I
I
9/1/2012 ·I
12/1/2012 -·
3/1/2013 -
6/1/2013
9/1/2013
U"1
0
I-' 0
0
I-' U"1
0
N 0
0
N U"1
0
w 0 0
w U"1 0
s:
~ I w
~
z ;::;:
"""' Q,) ,...
tD
n 0
::::s n tD ::::s ,...
Ql ,... -· 0 ::::s
"'
I-> I-> N N U'1 0 U'1 0 U'1 0 0 0 0 0 0
6/1/2005 _.
9/1/2005
12/1/2005
3/1/2006
6/1/2006
9/1/2006 -
12/1/2006 -
3/1/2007 -
6/1/2007 ~
9/1/2007
12/1/2007 s
3/1/2008 ~ I
6/1/2008 w
~
9/1/2008 n :::r
12/1/2008 -0 ""' 3/1/2009 -· c.
6/1/2009 n>
n 9/1/2009 0
12/1/2009 :::s n n> 3/1/2010 :::s r+
6/1/2010 ""' QJ
9/1/2010 r+ -· 0
12/1/2010 :::s
"' 3/1/2011
6/1/2011
9/1/2011 -
12/1/2011 -
3/1/2012 .
6/1/2012 .
9/1/2012 -
12/1/2012
3/1/2013 .
6/1/2013 .
9/1/2013
TabL
CSV Transmittal Letter
Kathy Weinel
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Dear Mr. Lundberg,
Kathy Weinel
Monday, November 18, 2013 12:09 PM
Rusty Lundberg
'Phillip Goble'; 'Dean Henderson'; Harold Roberts; Frank Filas, P.E; David Frydenlund; JoAnn
Tischler; Dan Hillsten; Harold Roberts; David Turk; Jaime Massey
Transmittal of CSV Files White Mesa Mill 2013 03 Nitrate Monitoring
1308556-EDD.csv
Attached to this e-mail are electronic copies of laboratory results for nitrate monitoring conducted at the White Mesa
Mill during the third quarter of 2013, in Comma Separated Value (CSV) format.
Please contact me at 303-389-4134 if you have any questions on this transmittal.
Yours Truly
Kathy Weinel
1